Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Santa Barbara City Council
June 16, 2026

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
June 16, 2026
Body
Santa Barbara City Council
Pages
511
Original file
73.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on docs.santabarbaraca.gov. That file is the official record.

6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(C)
Indicate whether groundwater is an existing or planned source of water available to the Supplier. If groundwater is identified as an existing or planned source of water… (include) a detailed description and analysis of the location, amount and sufficiency of groundwater pumped by the Supplier for the past five years.

Water supplies and recycled
water 6-1 Section 6.5, Page 6-13 to 6-20, table 6-5 on page 6-20

6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(A)
Indicate whether a groundwater sustainability plan or groundwater management plan has been adopted by the Supplier or if there is any other specific authorization for groundwater management.

Include a copy of the plan or authorization.

System supplies n/a

Page 6 ends

Management subsection—SGMA
discussion; City not required to
prepare GSP

6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(B) Describe the groundwater basin. System supplies n/a Section 6.5, page 6-13 to 6-18

6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(B) Indicate if the basin has been adjudicated and include a copy of the court order or decree and a description of the amount of water the Supplier has the legal right to pump. System supplies n/a N/A. Section 6.5 describes that basin is not adjudicated.

6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(B) For unadjudicated basins… (include) information as to whether DWR has identified the basin as a high- or medium-priority basin in the most current official departmental bulletin… Water supplies and recycled
water n/a

Page 6 ends

Management subsection—basins
identified as “very low” priority
under SGMA discussion).

6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(B) For unadjudicated basins… describe efforts by the Supplier to coordinate with sustainability or groundwater agencies to achieve sustainable groundwater conditions.

Water supplies and recycled
water n/a Section 6.5, pages 6-13 to 6-18

6.2 Section 6.2.2. 10631(b)(4)(C)
If groundwater is identified as an existing or planned source of water… (include) a detailed description and analysis of the location, amount and sufficiency of groundwater pumped by the Supplier for the past five years.

System supplies n/a Section 6.5, Page 6-13 to 6-20,
table 6-7 on page 6-31

6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(D) Provide a detailed description and analysis of the amount and location of groundwater that is projected to be pumped. System supplies 6-9

Page 6 ends

(basins/locations + pumping
capacity discussion); Table 67
(Projected Groundwater Supply)
on Page 6-31

6.1 Section 6.1 10631(b) Identify and quantify the existing and planned sources of water available for 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045 and optionally 2050. System supplies 6-8 and 6-9

Page 6 ends

Projected Water Supplies) on

Page 6 ends

6.2 Section 6.2.7 10631(c) Describe the opportunities for exchanges or transfers of water on a short-term or long-term basis. System supplies n/a Page 6-28 (Section 6.9 Water Exchanges and Transfers)

6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(a) Describe the wastewater collection and treatment systems in the Supplier’s service area with quantified amount of collection and treatment and the disposal methods.

System supplies (recycled
water) 6-2 Section 6.6.2, page 6-21

6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(b) Describe the quantity of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, is being discharged, and is otherwise available for use in a recycled water project.

System supplies (recycled
water) 6-3

Page 6 ends

provided in DWR Tables in
Appendix B.

6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(c) Describe the recycled water currently being used in the Supplier's service area. System supplies (recycled water) 6-4

Page 6 ends

(Recycled Water System) on

Page 6 ends

6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(d) Describe and quantify the potential uses of recycled water and provide a determination of the technical and economic feasibility of those uses.

System supplies (recycled
water) 6-4 Section 6.6.4, page 6-23 to 6-25
A-2
City of Santa Barbara
2025 UWMP
Appendix A - DWR UWMP Checklist June 30, 2026
Order 2025 Guidebook Location Water Code
Section Summary as Applies to UWMP Subject
Relevant
Submittal
Table
2025 UWMP Location

6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(e)
Describe the projected use of recycled water within the Supplier's service area at the end of 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, and describe the actual use of recycled water in comparison to uses previously projected.

System supplies (recycled
water) 6-4 and 6-5
Table 6-7 (Actual and Projected
Water Supplies) on Page 6-31,
DWR tables in Appendix B
include comparison to previous
projections

6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(f) Describe the actions that may be taken to encourage the use of recycled water and the projected results of these actions in terms of acre-feet of recycled water used per year.

System supplies (recycled
water) 6-6 Section 6.6.4, page 6-23 to 6-25

6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(g) Provide a plan for optimizing the use of recycled water in the Supplier's service area. System supplies (recycled water) n/a Section 6.6.4, page 6-23 to 6-25

6.2 Section 6.2.6 10631(g) Describe desalinated water project opportunities for long-term supply. System supplies 6-7 Section 6.7, page 6-25 to 6-26

6.2 Section 6.2.10 10631(f)
Describe the expected future water supply projects and programs that may be undertaken by the water Supplier to address water supply reliability in average, single-dry, and for a period of drought lasting five consecutive water years.

System supplies 6-7 Section 6.10, page 6-28 to 6-29

6.3 Section 6.3 and Appendix
O
10631.2(a) The UWMP must include energy information, as stated in the code, that a Supplier can readily obtain. System suppliers, energy intensity
O-1A, O-1B, O1C, and O-2Section 6.11, Table 6-6, page 6- 30 7.1 Section 7.1 10634 Provide information on the quality of existing sources of water available to the Supplier and the manner in which water quality affects water management strategies and supply reliability.

Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.1.1, table 7-1, page 7-2

7.2 Section 7.2 10635(a)
Service Reliability Assessment: Assess the water supply reliability during normal, dry, and a drought lasting five consecutive water years by comparing the total water supply sources available to the Supplier with the total projected water use over the next 20 years.

Water supply reliability
assessment
7-2, 7-3, and 7-
4 Section 7.1.4, page 7-4 to 7-10

7.2 Section 7.2.3 10620(f) Describe water management tools and options to maximize resources and minimize the need to import water from other regions.

Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 6.12, page 6-30

7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b) Provide a drought risk assessment as part of information considered in developing the demand management measures and water supply projects.

Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.2, Table 7-6, page 7-13

7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b)(1)
Include a description of the data, methodology, and basis for one or more supply shortage conditions that are necessary to conduct a drought risk assessment for a drought period that lasts five consecutive years.

Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.2, page 7-12

7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b)(2) Include a determination of the reliability of each source of supply under a variety of water shortage conditions.

Water supply reliability
assessment n/a
Section 7.1.4, page 7-5 for
Normal Year, page 7-6 for singledry year, and pages 7-8 to 7-9 for five consecutive dry years

7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b)(3) Include a comparison of the total water supply sources available to the Supplier with the total projected water use for the drought period.

Water supply reliability
assessment 7-5 Table 7-4, page 7-10

7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b)(4)
Include considerations of the historical drought hydrology, plausible changes on projected supplies and demands under climate change conditions, anticipated regulatory changes, and other locally applicable criteria.

Water supply reliability
assessment n/a
Section 7.1.4, page 7-5 for
Normal Year, page 7-6 for singledry year, and pages 7-8 to 7-9 for five consecutive dry years
8 Chapter 8 10632(a) Provide a water shortage contingency plan (WSCP) with specified elements below. Water shortage contingency planning n/a

Page 8 ends

overview); UWMP Appendix F is
the WSCP document
8 Chapter 8 10632(a)(1) Provide an analysis of water supply reliability (from Guidebook Chapter 7) in the WSCP. Water shortage contingency planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 2.1, pages 2-4, Table 2-1 on page 4

8.2 Section 8.2 10632(a)(2)(A) Provide the written decision-making process and other methods that the Supplier will use each year to determine its water reliability.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 3, pages 7-8

8.2 Section 8.2 10632(a)(2)(B) Provide data and methodology to evaluate the Supplier’s water reliability for the current year and one dry year pursuant to factors in the code.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 3, pages 7-9

8.3 Section 8.3 10632(a)(3)(A)
Define six standard water shortage levels of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50% shortage, and greater than 50% shortage. These levels shall be based on supply conditions, including percent reductions in supply, changes in groundwater levels, changes in surface elevation, or other conditions. The shortage levels shall also apply to a catastrophic interruption of supply.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a
Appendix F, WSCP Section 4,
page 9, crosswalk on Figure 4-1,
page 13
A-3
City of Santa Barbara
2025 UWMP
Appendix A - DWR UWMP Checklist June 30, 2026
Order 2025 Guidebook Location Water Code
Section Summary as Applies to UWMP Subject
Relevant
Submittal
Table
2025 UWMP Location

8.3 Section 8.3 10632(a)(3)(B) Suppliers with an existing WSCP that uses different water shortage levels must cross reference their categories with the six standard categories.

Water shortage contingency
planning 8-1
Appendix F, WSCP Section 4,
page 9-13, crosswalk on Figure
4-1, page 14

8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(A) Suppliers with WSCPs that align with the defined shortage levels must specify locally appropriate supply augmentation actions.

Water shortage contingency
planning 8-2 Appendix F, WSCP Section 5.2, Table 5-2, page 19

8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(B) Specify locally appropriate demand reduction actions to adequately respond to shortages. Water shortage contingency planning 8-3 Appendix F, WSCP Section 5.1, Table 5-1, pages 15-18

8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(C) Specify locally appropriate operational changes. Water shortage contingency planning 8-2 Appendix F, WSCP Section 5.3, pages 19-20

8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(D) Specify additional mandatory prohibitions against specific water use practices that are in addition to State-mandated prohibitions are appropriate to local conditions.

Water shortage contingency
planning Table 8-3 Appendix F, WSCP Section 5.1, Table 5-1, pages 15-18

8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(E) Estimate the extent to which the gap between supplies and demand will be reduced by implementation of the action.

Water shortage contingency
planning 8-2 and 8-3 Appendix F, WSCP Section 5.1, Table 5-1, pages 15-18

8.4 Section 8.4.6 10632.5 The UWMP shall include a seismic risk assessment and mitigation plan. Water shortage contingency plan n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 5.5, page 24

8.5 Section 8.5 10632(a)(5)(A) Suppliers must describe that they will inform customers, the public and others regarding any current or predicted water shortages.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 6.0, page 25-26

8.5 Section 8.5 10632(a)(5)(B),
10632(a)(5)(C)
Suppliers must describe that they will inform customers, the public and others regarding any shortage response actions triggered or anticipated to be triggered and other relevant communications.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 6.0, page 25-27

8.6 Section 8.6 10632(a)(6) Retail Supplier must describe how it will ensure compliance with and enforce provisions of the WSCP. Water shortage contingency planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 7.0, page 27

8.7 Section 8.7 10632(a)(7)(A) Describe the legal authority that empowers the Supplier to enforce shortage response actions. Water shortage contingency planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 8.0, page 27

8.7 Section 8.7 10632(a)(7)(B) Provide a statement that the Supplier will declare a water shortage emergency per Water Code Chapter 3. Water Shortage Emergencies .

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 8.0, page 27

8.7 Section 8.7 10632(a)(7)(C) Provide a statement that the Supplier will coordinate with any city or county within which it provides water for the possible proclamation of a local emergency.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 8.0, page 27

8.8 Section 8.8 10632(a)(8)(A) Describe the potential revenue reductions and expense increases associated with activated shortage response actions.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 9.0, page 27-29

8.8 Section 8.8 10632(a)(8)(B) Provide a description of mitigation actions needed to address revenue reductions and expense increases associated with activated shortage response actions.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 9.0, page 27-29

8.8 Section 8.8 10632(a)(8)(C) Retail Suppliers must describe the cost of compliance with Water Code Chapter 3.3, Excessive Residential Water Use During Drought .

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 9.0, page 27-29

8.9 Section 8.9 10632(a)(9)
Retail Suppliers must describe the monitoring and reporting requirements and procedures that ensure appropriate data are collected, tracked, and analyzed for purposes of monitoring customer compliance.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 10.0, page 29

8.10 Section 8.10 10632(a)(10)
Describe reevaluation and improvement procedures for monitoring and evaluation the WSCP to ensure risk tolerance is adequate and appropriate water shortage mitigation strategies are implemented.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 11.0, page 29

8.11 Section 8.11 10632(b) Analyze and define water features that are artificially supplied with water, including ponds, lakes, waterfalls, and fountains, separately from swimming pools and spas.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 12.0, page 30

8.12 Section 8.12 10632(c) Make available the WSCP to customers and any city or county where it provides water within 30 days after adoption of the plan.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix F, WSCP Section 13.0, page 30

9.1 Sections 9.1 10631(e)(1)
Retail Suppliers shall provide a description of the nature and extent of each demand management measure implemented over the past five years. The description will address specific measures listed in code.

Demand management
measures
n/a Section 9.2 and 9.3, pages 9-1
to 9-9, Table 9-1, page 9-9

9.2 Sections 9.2 10631(e)(2) Wholesale Suppliers shall describe specific demand management measures listed in code, their distribution system asset management program, and Supplier assistance program.

Demand management
measures
n/a N/A - Only applicable to
Wholesalers
10 Chapter 10 10608.26(a) Retail Suppliers shall conduct a public hearing to discuss adoption, implementation, and economic impact of water use targets (recommended to discuss compliance).

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a
Section 10.1, page 10-2,
Appendix D- notice of public
hearing

10.2 Section 10.2.1 10621(b)
Notify, at least 60 days prior to the public hearing, any city or county within which the Supplier provides water that the Supplier will be reviewing the UWMP and considering amendments or changes to the plan.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation 10-1 Section 2.3, page 2-3, Section 10.1, page 10-2

10.4 Section 10.4 10621(f) Each urban water Supplier shall update and submit its 2025 plan   to DWR by July 1, 202  6. Plan adoption, submittal, and implementation n/a Section 10.1, page 10-2
A-4
City of Santa Barbara
2025 UWMP
Appendix A - DWR UWMP Checklist June 30, 2026
Order 2025 Guidebook Location Water Code
Section Summary as Applies to UWMP Subject
Relevant
Submittal
Table
2025 UWMP Location

10.2 Sections 10.2.2, 10.3, and

10.5 10642
Provide supporting documentation that the Supplier made the UWMP and WSCP available for public inspection, published notice of the public hearing, and held a public hearing about the UWMP and WSCP.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a
Section 10.1, page 10-2,
Appendix D- notice of public
hearing

10.2 Section 10.2.2 10642 The Supplier is to provide the time and place of the hearing to any city or county within which the Supplier provides water.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation 10-1
Section 10.1, page 10-2,
Appendix D- notice of public
hearing

10.3 Section 10.3.2 10642 Provide supporting documentation that the UWMP and WSCP has been adopted as prepared or modified.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a
Adoption and Submittal process
described in Section 10.1, page
10-2

10.4 Section 10.4 10644(a) Provide supporting documentation that the Supplier has submitted their UWMP to the California State Library.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a
Adoption and Submittal process
described in Section 10.1, page
10-3

10.4 Section 10.4 10644(a)(1) Provide supporting documentation that the Supplier has submitted their UWMP to any city or county within which the Supplier provides water no later than 30 days after adoption.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a
Adoption and Submittal process
described in Section 10.1, page
10-4

10.4 Sections 10.4.1 and 10.4.2 10644(a)(2) The UWMP, or amendments to the UWMP, submitted to DWR shall be submitted electronically. Plan adoption, submittal, and implementation n/a
Adoption and Submittal process
described in Section 10.1, page
10-5

10.7 Section 10.7.2 10644(b) If revised, submit a copy of the WSCP to DWR within 30 days of adoption. Plan adoption, submittal, and implementation n/a
Adoption and Submittal process
described in Section 10.1, page
10-6

10.5 Section 10.5 10645(a)
Provide supporting documentation that, not later than 30 days after filing a copy of its UWMP with DWR, the Supplier has or will make the plan available for public review during normal business hours.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a
Adoption and Submittal process
described in Section 10.1, page
10-7

10.5 Section 10.5 10645(b)
Provide supporting documentation that, not later than 30 days after filing a copy of its WSCP with DWR, the Supplier has or will make the plan available for public review during normal business hours.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a
Public availability process
described in Section 10.2, page
10-8

10.6 Section 10.6 10621(c) If Supplier is regulated by the Public Utilities Commission, include its plan and contingency plan as part of its general rate case filings.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a N/A - City is not regulated by the CPUC A-5
City of Santa Barbara DWR UWMP Standard Tables
2025 Urban Water Management Plan | B
Appendix B DWR UWMP Standard
Tables
B
No
Public Water System
Number Public Water System Name Number of Municipal Connections Volume of Water Supplied CA4210010 CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
WATER DEPARTMENT 27,695 11,799
27,695 11,799
Has there been a change in the number of affiliated Public Water Systems since the 2020 UWMP? (OPTIONAL)
Submittal Table 2-1 Retail: Public Water Systems
Total:

NOTES: Total connections and volume of water include potable and non-potable.

DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.


Name of RUWMP
Drop down list
If "Other" specify name of
RUWMP
Submittal Table 2-2: Plan Identification
NOTES:

Individual UWMP
Type of Plan
Regional Urban Water Management Plan (RUWMP)
Select Only
One




Supplier is a wholesale supplier
Supplier is a retail supplier
UWMP Tables are in calendar years
UWMP Tables are in fiscal years
Unit AF
NOTES:

Units of measure used in UWMP
(select from drop down)
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

Submittal Table 2-3: Supplier Identification
Type of Supplier (select one or both)
Fiscal or Calendar Year (select one)
If using fiscal years provide month and date that the fiscal year begins (mm/dd) 7/1
Submittal Table 2-4 Retail: Water Supplier Information Exchange The retail Supplier has informed the following wholesale supplier(s) of projected water use in accordance with Water Code Section 10631 (h).

Wholesale Water Supplier Name
Central Coast Water Authority
United States Bureau of Reclamation / Cachuma Operation and Maitenance Board NOTES:

Population
Served 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050(opt)
Santa
Barbara 90,723 91,909 93,110 94,326 94,704 95,084
Mission
Canyon 2,611 2,683 2,758 2,834 2,913 2,994
Total 93,334 94,592 95,868 97,160 97,617 98,078
Submittal Table 3-1 Retail: Population - Current and Projected | Water Code Section 10631(a) NOTES:

Use Type
Drop down list
May select each use multiple times
These are the only use types that will be
recognized by the WUE data online
Level of Treatment
When Delivered
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Volume
Single Family Single-Family Potable 3,764
Multi-Family Multi-Family Potable 2,536
Commercial Commercial Potable 2,007
Institutional/Governmental Included in Commercial Demand Potable - Landscape Landscape Irrigation Potable 547
Distribution System Water Loss Real and Apparent Loss Potable 411 Other (optional) Unbilled Authorized Consumption Potable 131 Sales/Transfers/Exchanges to other Sales to MWD Potable 1,379 Landscape Recycled Water for Irrigation Non-Potable 771 Industrial Recycled Water Use at El Estero WRC Non-Potable 253 11,799
NOTES:

Total:

Submittal Table 4-1 Retail: Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water - 2025 Actual | Water Code Section 10631(d)(1) Additional Description
(as needed)
FY 2024-2025 Actual
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

USER TESTING: For reporting of STORAGE, see guidance in email.

Use Type
Drop down list
May select each use multiple times
These are the only Use Types that will
be recognized by the WUEdata online
submittal tool
Level of
Treatment When
Delivered
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(opt)
Single Family Single-Family Potable 3,569 3,440 3,336 3,281 3,233 Multi-Family Multi-Family Potable 2,558 2,644 2,755 2,775 2,805 Commercial Commercial/Institutional/Governmental Potable 2,087 2,201 2,243 2,294 2,349 Landscape Landscape Irrigation Potable 536 533 532 529 527 Distribution System Water Loss Nonrevenue Potable 1,067 1,080 1,089 1,094 1,100 Other (optional) Unbilled Authorized Consumption Potable 132 133 135 135 136 Sales/Transfers/Exchanges to other Suppliers Sales to MWD Potable 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 Landscape Recycled Water for Irrigation Non-Potable 720 720 720 720 720 Industrial Recycled Water Use at El Estero WRC Non-Potable 300 300 300 300 300 12,399 12,481 12,538 12,557 12,600
NOTES:

Projected Water Use (Report To the Extent that Records are Available) Submittal Table 4-2 Retail: Total Uses of Potable, and Non-PotableWater - Projected | Water Code Section 10631(d)(1) Total:

DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

USER TESTING: For reporting of STORAGE, see guidance in email.

Additional Description
(as needed)
Are Future Water Savings Included in Projections?
(Refer to Appendix K of UWMP Guidebook)
Drop down list (y/n)
Yes
If "Yes" to above:

State the section or page number, in the cell to the right, where citations of the codes, ordinances, or otherwise are utilized in demand projections are found.

OPTIONAL Suppliers may complete Optional Submittal Table 4-4 R to quantify the expected savings.

Section 4.3
Are Lower Income Residential Demands Included In Projections? (Refer to Appendix K of UWMP Guidebook)
Drop down list (y/n)
Yes
OPTIONAL If the method for accounting Lower Income Residential Demands has been included, provide page number where this accounting can be found. (An example is included in Appendix K.)
Section 4.3
Submittal Table 4-3 Retail: Inclusion in Water Use Projections | Water Code Section 10631 (a), 10631 (d)(4)(A), and 10631 (d)(4)(B)
NOTES:

Public Water System ID #
Reported in Table 2-1 R Reporting Period
Submitted to DWR Water
Loss Audit Program
(yes/no)
FY 2020 - 2021 Yes
FY 2021 - 2022 Yes
FY 2022 - 2023 Yes
FY 2023 - 2024 Yes
FY 2024 - 2025 Yes
DWR NOTES: Suppliers will provide a reference to the WUEdata submittals of their Water Loss Audit Reports
Submittal Table 4-5 Retail: Water Loss Audit Reporting | Water Code Section 10631(d)(3)(A)
Report all five years for each Public Water System as available.

CA4210010
NOTES:
2028 Real Water
Loss Standard per
Unit per day (as
calculated by the
Water Board)
Units for Real
Water Loss
(as used by
the Water
Board)
Drop down list
Number of Units
(Connections or
Miles
corresponding
with units
selected.)
Volume of
Total Real
Loss (from
AWWA Water
Loss Audit)
2025 or
Most Recent
Year Real
Water Loss
Per Unit per
Day
2028 Apparent
Water Loss
Standard per Unit
per Day (as
calculated by the
Water Board
Units for
Apparent
Water Loss
Number of
Connections
Volume of Total
Apparent Loss
(from AWWA
Water Loss
Audit)
2025 or Most
Recent Year
Apparent Water
Loss Per Unit
per Day
CA4210010 Yes 28.8
Gallons per
Service
Connection per
Day (GPSCD)
27,695 296 10 5.1
Gallons per
Service
Connection per
Day (GPSCD)
27,695 116 3.7
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) for Water Loss MUST remain consistent with units reported in Submittal Table 2-3. The units reported in Submittal Table 2-3 are used in this table's calculations.

NOTES:

Did the Water Board
Calculate a Water Loss
Standard for this Public
Water System? (y/n)
If no, Supplier will not
complete this row.

Submittal Table 4-6 Retail: Progress Towards 2028 Water Loss Standard | Water Code Section 10631(d)(3)(C) Public Water
System ID #
Reported in
Submittal Table
2-1 R
Real Water Loss Apparent Water Loss
Water Board's Calculated Water Loss Standards

Was Supplier
part of a merger
or consolidation
since 2020?
Actual 2025
GPCD
(From SB X7-7
Compliance
Form)
Did Supplier meet
the 2020 Target in
2025?
Individual Target 117 92 Yes
DWR NOTES: Suppliers calculating a 2025 GPCD will need to complete and submit SB X 7-7 Compliance Tables to verify the use of SB X7-7 NOTES:

Submittal Table 5-1 Retail: SB X7-7 2020 Target Progress | Water Code Section 10608.40 Not an Urban Water Supplier in 2020. Supplier will not complete this table.

Regional Alliance
Target or
Individual Target?
Drop down list
2020 Target Actual 2020
GPCD
Did Supplier
Achieve
Targeted
Reduction for
2020?
Only for suppliers that did not meet the Target in 2020 

Groundwater Type
Drop Down List
May use each category
multiple times
Water Type
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Location or Basin Name FY 2020 -
2021
FY 2021 -
2022
FY 2022 -
2023
FY 2023 -
2024
FY 2024 -
2025
Alluvial Basin Potable Foothill Basin 0 0 0 62 0
Alluvial Basin Potable Storage Unit #1 0 0 578 0 0
Alluvial Basin Non-Potable Storage Unit #3 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 578 62 0
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

NOTES:

Submittal Table 6-1 Retail: Groundwater Volume Pumped | Water Code Section 10631(4) and 10631(4)(c) Supplier does not pump groundwater.

The supplier will not complete the table below.

All or part of the groundwater described below is desalinated. (OPTIONAL) Total:

Name of Wastewater
Collection Agency
Wastewater Volume Metered or
Estimated?

OPTIONAL
Drop Down List
Volume of
Wastewater
Collected from
UWMP Service
Area FY 2024-
2025
Name of Wastewater
Treatment Plant
(WWTP)
Drop down list
Is WWTP Located
Within UWMP Area?
Drop Down List
City of Santa Barbara Metered 6,710 El Estero Water
Resource Center Yes
County Service Area Metered 160 El Estero Water
Resource Center Yes
Goleta Sanitary District Estimated 30 Goleta SD WWTP,
Place ID 227568 No
6,900
NOTES: A small amount of parcels on the western edge of the City's water service area receives sewer service the from the adjacent Goleta Sanitary District. These parcels account for 93 accounts out of approximately 25,400 City sewer accounts.

As of 2009, there were approximately 785 parcels connected to on-site septic systems treating an estimated 400 ac-ft per year of flow.

Metered flows to El Estero are assumed to be 2.4% from the CSA, 0.4% from City of Goleta, and 97.2% from City of Santa Barbara.

DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

Submittal Table 6-2 Retail: Wastewater Collected Within Service Area in 2025 | Water Code Section 10633(a) Percentage of 2025 service area population covered by wastewater collection system (OPTIONAL) Wastewater Collection Recipient of Collected Wastewater Total Wastewater Received from UWMP Service Area in 2025:

There is no wastewater collection system. The supplier will not complete the table below.

Percentage of 2025 service area covered by wastewater collection system (OPTIONAL) 
Recycled Water
Standard or
Treatment Level
Drop down list
Volume
Recycled Water
Standard or
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
Recycled Water
Standard or
Treatment Level
Drop down list
Volume
Recycled
Water Standard
or Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
Recycled
Water
Standard or
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume Name of
other entity
El Estero Water
Resource Center No 6,869 6,869 Tertiary 1,024 Tertiary 0 Secondary, Disinfected - 2.2 5,845 Secondary, Disinfected - 2.2 0 Tertiary 0 N/A 6,869 6,869 1,024 0 5,845 0 0
Add additional rows as needed
Total:

DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

NOTES:

Submittal Table 6-3 Retail: Wastewater Treatment and End Uses Within UWMP Service Area in 2025 | Water Code Section 10633(a) No wastewater is treated or disposed of within the UWMP service area.

The supplier will not complete the table below.

Wastewater
Treatment Plant
Name and Place ID
Number
Drop down list
Does This Plant Treat
Wastewater Generated
Outside the UWMP
Service Area?
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
2025 Volume of
Wastewater Received
from UWMP Service
Area
(As Reported in
Submittal Table 6-2 R )
Total 2025
Volume of
Water Treated
2025 End Uses of Wastewater in UWMP Service Area
Recycled Water Within
UWMP Service Area
Recycled Water Outside
of UWMP Service Area Wastewater Discharged Instream Flow Permit Requirements Wastewater Delivered to Another
Entity

Volume
Narrative
page
number
Commercial use Non-Potable 17 10 10 10 10 10 184 6-23
Landscape irrigation (exc golf
courses) Non-Potable 340 340 340 340 340 340
Golf course irrigation Non-Potable 337 330 330 330 330 330 Industrial use Non-Potable El Estero Process Water 253 280 280 280 280 280 Other (Description Required) Non-Potable Sales 72 50 50 50 50 50 Other (Description Required) Non-Potable
Dust Control, flushing
sewers, and vactor
trucks
5 10 10 10 10 10
1,024 1,020 1,020 1,020 1,020 1,020
Submittal Table 6-4 Retail: Recycled Water Direct Beneficial Uses Within Service Area | Water Code Section 10633 (c)(d) Recycled water is not used and is not planned for use within the service area of the supplier. The supplier will only complete the column on "Potential Recycled Water Use" and submit an accompanying narrative on the feasibility of that potential recycled water use.

Source of 2025 Supplemental Water (OPTIONAL) :

Name(s) of Facility/ies Producing (Treating) the Recycled Water (OPTIONAL) : El Estero Water Resource Center NPDES, Place ID 222443 Name of Supplier Operating the Recycled Water Distribution System (OPTIONAL) : City of Santa Barbara Supplemental Water Added in 2025 (volume) Include units (OPTIONAL) : 13 Total:

NOTES:

DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

Potential recycled water use - a description of the feasibility of these uses must be included in the narrative. 2035 2040 2045 2050
(opt)
Potential Recycled
Water Use
Use Type
Drop down list
Water Type
(after
treatment if
treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down
list
Additional
Information
(as needed)
2025 2030

2020 Projection for 2025 2025 Actual Use
Landscape irrigation (exc golf
courses) 500 340
Golf course irrigation 400 337
Commercial use 20 17
Industrial reuse 300 253
Other (Description Required) Sales 0 72
Other (Description Required)
Dust Control, flushing
sewers, and vactor
trucks
1 5
1,221 1,024
NOTES:

Submittal Table 6-5 Retail: 2020 UWMP Recycled Water Use Projection Compared to 2025 Actual | Water Code Section 10633
Recycled water was not used in 2025 nor projected for use in 2020.

The supplier will not complete the table below.

Use Type
Total:

DWR NOTES Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.


Name of Action Description Planned Implementation Year Expected Increase in Recycled Water Use
#N/A
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) MUST remain consistent with units reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

The units reported in Submittal Table 2-3 are used in this table's calculations.

NOTES:

Total:

Total (AF):

Submittal Table 6-6 Retail: Methods to Encourage Future Recycled Water Use | Water Code Section 10633 (f) Supplier does not plan to expand recycled water use in the future. Supplier will not complete the table below but will provide narrative explanation.

Provide page location of narrative in UWMP: Potable Reuse discussion on Page 6-24 

Section 6.10,
page 6-29
Drop Down List
(yes/no)
If Yes, Supplier
Name
Add additional rows as needed
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

NOTES:

Submittal Table 6-7 Retail: Expected Future Water Supply Projects or Programs | Water Code Section 10631 (f) No expected future water supply projects or programs that provide a quantifiable increase to the agency's water supply.

Supplier will not complete the table below.

Some or all of the supplier's future water supply projects or programs are not compatible with this table and are described in a narrative format.

Provide page location of narrative in the UWMP
Joint Project with other
suppliers? Additional
Description
(as needed)
Water Type
(after treatment
if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list
Planned
Implementation
Year
Planned for
Use in Year
Type
Drop Down
List
Expected Increase
in Water Supply to
Supplier
(This may be a
range)
Name of Future
Projects or
Programs
Water Supply
Drop down list
May use each category multiple
times.These are the only water
supply categories that will be
recognized by the WUEdata online
submittal tool
Actual Volume
Water Type
(after treatment
if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list
Total Right or Safe
or Sustainable
Yield
(OPTIONAL)
Surface water (not desalinated) Cachuma Project 3,178 Potable Surface water (not desalinated) Gibraltar Reservior 4,480 Potable Other (optional) Mission Tunnel (Infiltration) 1,374 Potable Desalinated Water - Surface Water 1,663 Potable
Groundwater (not desalinated) 0 Potable
Purchased or Imported Water State Water Project 0 Potable Recycled Water 1,024 Non-Potable
Total: 11,719 0
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

USER TESTING: For reporting of STORAGE, see guidance in email.

NOTES:

Submittal Table 6-8 Retail: Water Supplies — 2025 Actual | Water Code Section 10631 (b) Additional Description
(as needed)
2025

2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Charles Meyer
Desalination Plant 3,125
Open-water
intake (screened
or unscreened)
Sea water 34,500 Sewer 2,199 2,784 1,930 2,288 1,663 City of Santa Barbara, Montecito Water District
2,199 2,784 1,930 2,288 1,663
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submital Table 2-3.

NOTES:

OPTIONAL Submittal Table 6-8DS: Source Water Desalination by Urban Water Supplier Total:

Supplier does not reduce salinity in either groundwater or surface water prior to distribution.

Desalination Facility
(Drop Down list)
Plant
Capacity
Intake Type
Drop down list
Source Water Type
Drop down list Influent TDS Brine DischargeDrop down list Volume of Water Desalinated
Name(s) of Agencies
that Receive this Water
Reasonably Available
Volume
Total Right or Safe or
Sustainable Yield
(OPTIONAL)
Reasonably Available
Volume
Total Right or Safe or
Sustainable Yield
(OPTIONAL)
Reasonably Available
Volume
Total Right or Safe or
Sustainable Yield
(OPTIONAL)
Reasonably Available
Volume
Total Right or Safe or
Sustainable Yield
(OPTIONAL)
Reasonably Available
Volume
Total Right or Safe or
Sustainable Yield
(OPTIONAL)
Surface water (not desalinated) Cachuma Project Potable 8,277 8,277 8,277 8,277 8,277 8,277 8,277 8,277 8,277 8,277 Surface water (not desalinated) Gibraltar Reservior Potable 3,510 3,510 3,510 3,510 3,510 3,510 3,510 3,510 3,510 3,510 Surface water (not desalinated) Mission Tunnel (Infiltration) Potable 942 942 942 942 942 Desalinated Water - Surface Water Potable 2,500 3,125 2,500 3,125 2,500 3,125 2,500 3,125 2,500 3,125 Groundwater (not desalinated) Potable 972 3,320 972 3,320 972 3,320 972 3,320 972 3,320 Purchased or Imported Water State Water Project Potable 1,736 3,300 1,688 3,300 1,639 3,300 1,591 3,300 1,543 3,300 Transfers Montecito Water District Potable 300 300 300 300 300 Recycled Water Non-Potable 1,020 1,020 1,020 1,020 1,020 19,257 21,532 19,209 21,532 19,160 21,532 19,112 21,532 19,064 21,532 DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

USER TESTING: For reporting of STORAGE, see guidance in email.

NOTES:

Total:

Submittal Table 6-9 Retail: Water Supplies — Projected | Water Code Section 10631 (b) Water Supply Projected Water Supply (Report to the Extent Practicable) Drop down list
May use each category multiple
times.These are the only water supply
categories that will be recognized by the
WUEdata online submittal tool
Additional Detail on Water
Supply
Water Type
(after treatment if
treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 (opt)
Water Delivery Product
drop down list
(If delivering more than one type of product use Table OStart Date of Reporting Period 1/1/2023 End Date of Reporting Period 12/31/2023
Is upstream embedded energy in the values reported? No
Units of Measure for Water AF Total Utility Hydropower Net Utility 11,257 0 11,257
11,163,470 0 11,163,470
3,043 0 3,043
0 Metered Data
Energy Consumed (kWh)
Energy Intensity (kWh/vol. converted to MG)
Narrative:

Energy consumption data was sourced from the 2023 billed meter usage of the City's water infrastrcture.

Quantity of Self-Generated Renewable Energy
kWh
Data Quality (Estimate, Metered Data, Combination of Estimates and Metered Data) Data Quality Narrative:

Table O-1B: Recommended Energy Reporting - SINGLE DELIVERY PRODUCT - TOTAL UTILITY APPROACH Urban Water Supplier Operational Control
Sum of All Water
Management Processes
Non-Consequential
Hydropower
Volume of Water Entering Process

% of Average Supply
Average Year 2025 100%
Single-Dry Year 2016 65%
Consecutive Dry
Years 1st Year 2012 122%
Consecutive Dry
Years 2nd Year 2013 118%
Consecutive Dry
Years 3rd Year 2014 103%
Consecutive Dry
Years 4th Year 2015 82%
Consecutive Dry
Years 5th Year 2016 57%
DWR NOTES: Supplier may use multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R if different water sources have different base years and the supplier chooses to report the base years for each water source separately. If a Supplier uses multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R, in the "Note" section of each submittal table, state that multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R are being used and identify the particular water source that is being reported in each submittal table.

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

NOTES:
19,257
12,424
23,457
22,636
19,810
15,704
11,014
OPTIONAL Submittal Table 7-1 Retail: Basis of Water Year Data (Reliability Assessment) Year Type
Base Year (If not using a
calendar year, type in the
last year of the fiscal, water
year, or range of years, for
example, water year 2024-
2025, use 2025)
Available Supplies if
Year Type Repeats
Quantification of available supplies is not compatible with this table and is provided elsewhere in the UWMP.

Location __________________________
Quantification of available supplies is provided in this table as either volume only, percent only, or both.

Volume Available
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 (Opt)
Supply totals
(autofill from Submittal Table 6-9 R) 19,257 19,209 19,160 19,112 19,064 Use totals
(autofill from Submittal Table 4-2 R) 12,399 12,481 12,539 12,557 12,600 Surplus/(shortfall) 6,858 6,728 6,621 6,555 6,464
Submittal Table 7-2 Retail: Normal Year Supply and Use Comparison | Water Code Section 10635 (a) 10635. (a) Every urban water supplier shall include, as part of its urban water management plan, an assessment of the reliability of its water service to its customers during normal, dry, and multiple dry water years. This water supply and demand assessment shall compare the total water supply sources available to the water supplier with the long-term total projected water use over the next 20 years, in five-year increments, for a normal water year, a single dry water year, and a drought lasting five consecutive water years.
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 (Opt)
Supply Totals: 12,424 12,424 12,424 12,424 12,424
Use Totals: 12,399 11,980 12,034 12,052 12,092
Surplus/(shortfall) 25 444 390 372 332
Submittal Table 7-3 Retail: Single Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison | Water Code Section 10635(a)
DWR NOTES : Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

NOTES: 5% extraordinary conservation is included begining in 2035 to reduce the water use total. 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 (Opt)
First Year Supply Totals: 23,457 23,457 23,457 23,457 23,457 Use Totals: 12,399 12,481 12,538 12,557 12,599
Surplus/(shortfall) 11,058 10,976 10,919 10,900 10,858
Second Year Supply Totals: 22,451 22,369 22,312 22,293 22,251 Use Totals: 12,399 12,481 12,538 12,557 12,599
Surplus/(shortfall) 10,052 9,887 9,774 9,736 9,652
Third Year Supply Totals: 19,440 19,275 19,162 19,123 19,039 Use Totals: 12,399 12,481 12,538 12,557 12,599
Surplus/(shortfall) 7,041 6,793 6,624 6,566 6,440
Fourth Year Supply Totals: 15,704 15,704 15,704 15,704 15,704 Use Totals: 12,399 12,481 12,538 12,557 12,599
Surplus/(shortfall) 3,305 3,223 3,166 3,147 3,105
Fifth Year Supply Totals: 11,014 11,014 11,014 11,014 11,014 Use Totals: 10,409 10,475 10,520 10,536 10,569
Surplus/(shortfall) 605 539 494 478 445
Submittal Table 7-4 Retail: Five Consecutive Dry Years Supply and Demand Comparison | Water Code Section 10635(a)
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in NOTES: 20% extraordinary conservation is included in Year 5 to reduce the water use total. 2026 Total
Total Water Use: 12,307
Total Supplies: 22,400
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 10,093
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit 0
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit 0
Revised Surplus/(shortfall) 10,093
2027 Total
Total Water Use: 12,317
Total Supplies: 24,533
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 12,217
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit 0
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit 0
Revised Surplus/(shortfall) 12,217
2028 Total
Total Water Use: 12,339
Total Supplies: 25,977
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 13,637
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit 0
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit 0
Revised Surplus/(shortfall) 13,637
2029 Total
Total Water Use: 12,366
Total Supplies: 22,353
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 9,986
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit 0
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit 0
Revised Surplus/(shortfall) 9,986
2030 Total
Total Water Use: 12,399
Total Supplies: 13,806
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 1,407
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit 0
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit 0
Revised Surplus/(shortfall) 1,407
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

NOTES:

OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) Submittal Table 7-5 Retail: Five-Year Drought Risk Assessment | Water Code Section 10635(b)(3) OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) 
Standard
Shortage Levels
Percent Shortage
Range
Suppliers
Shortage Levels Percent Shortage Range
1 Up to 10% 1 0-10%
2 Up to 20% 2 10-25%
3 Up to 30% 3 25-50%
4 Up to 40% 3 25-50%
5 Up to 50% 3 25-50%
6 >50% 4 >50%
(B) An urban water supplier with an existing water shortage contingency plan that uses different water Submittal Table 8-1: Cross-reference for Standard vs Supplier Shortage Levels | Water Code Section 10632(a)(3)(B)
Supplier Uses the Standard Six Levels of Water Shortage.

The supplier will not complete this table.

NOTES:
(3)(A)Six standard water shortage levels corresponding to progressive ranges of up to 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 percent shortages and greater than 50 percent shortage. Urban water suppliers shall define these shortage levels based on the suppliers’ water supply conditions, including percentage reductions in water supply, changes in groundwater levels, changes in surface elevation or level of subsidence, or other changes in hydrological or other local conditions indicative of the water supply available for use. Shortage levels shall also apply to catastrophic interruption of water supplies, including, but not limited to, a regional power outage, an earthquake, and other potential emergency events.
10632 (a) Every urban water supplier shall prepare and adopt a water shortage contingency plan as part of its urban water management plan that consists of each of the following elements:

Yes
Shortage Level
Supply Augmentation
Methods and Other Actions
by Water Supplier
Drop down list
These are the only
categories that will be
accepted by the WUEdata
online submittal tool
How much is this going
to reduce the shortage
gap?
Include units used
(volume type or
percentage)
Additional Explanation or Reference
(OPTIONAL)
All Stored Emergency Supply Varying
Groundwater is pumped from drought storage volume.

The amount is dependent on diminished quantity from
City's supply portfolio.

All Other Purchases Varying Amount of water purchased depended on dimished quanity from City's supply portfolio.

Submittal Table 8-2 Retail: Supply Augmentation and Other Actions | Water Code Section 10632(a)(4)(A),(C) and (E) Is the Supplier completing this table using the standard six levels? (yes/no) Add additional rows as needed
NOTES:

Shortage Level
Demand Reduction Actions
Drop down list
These are the only categories that
will be accepted by the WUEdata
online submittal tool. Select those
that apply.

How much is this going to
reduce the shortage gap?
Include units used
(volume type or percentage)
Additional Explanation or Reference
(OPTIONAL)
All Expand Public Information
Campaign 0-5% Community outreach that includes increased advertising, presentations to community groups, workshops, and enhanced website resources All Offer Water Use Surveys 0-1% Indoor and outdoor water checkups available to all customer classes All Provide Rebates on Plumbing
Fixtures and Devices 0-1% Offer or expand rebates on a variety of plumbing fixtures that are high efficiency such as washers, toilets, and urinals All Provide Rebates for Landscape
Irrigation Efficiency 0-1% Offer or expand rebates for drip irrigation conversions, smart irrigation controllers, water wise plants, and rain sensors to improve efficiency All Provide Rebates for Turf
Replacement 0-1% Offer or expand rebates for community members who wish to replace their turf with a water wise garden All Decrease Line Flushing, or Pursue
Zero Discharge Flushing Methods 0-1% The City uses zero discharge water recycling trucks for water main and wastewater collection system cleaning.

All Other – Leaky device 0-1% Customers are required to repair any leaky or malfunctioning devices within 72 hours of notification of leak
All Landscape – Runoff 0-1% Landscape irrigation in excess leading to runoff onto nearby surfaces is prohibited All Other – Post-rainfall prohibition 0-1% Prohibit irrigation with potable water during and within 48 hours after measurable rainfall
1 Reduce System Water Loss 0-1% The City increases efforts to correct water system losses, including repairing leaks and eliminating illicit connections.
2 Increase Water Waste Patrols 0-1% Patrols to discourage water wasting and correct water wasting practices in the community.
2 Other - Nozzles 0-1% Only hoses with automatic shutoff nozzle fixtures are permitted 2 Other - Prohibit vehicle washing 0-1%
Prohibit washings cars, boats, trailers, aircraft, or other vehicles except with hose shutoff nozzle or at commercial or fleet vehicle washing facilities using water recycling equipment
2 Landscape - Limit landscape
irrigation to specific times 0-5% Prohibit irrigation during the hours when evaporation is highest. 2 CII - Lodging linen service 0-1% Hotels/motels must provide guests with option to reuse towels and linens for more than one day
2 CII - Restaurants serve water upon
request
0-1% No restaurant, hotel, café, cafeteria, or other public place where food is served shall serve drinking water to any customer unless expressly requested 2 Other 0-1% Require posting of water shortage notice at restaurants, hotels/motels, and commercial showering & car washing facilities
2 Pools and Spas - Require covers
for pools and spas 0-1% Require covers for swimming pools and spas when not in use 3 Other - Prohibit use of potable
water for washing hard surfaces 0-1%
Prohibit use of potable water to wash sidewalks, walkways, driveways, parking lots, open ground, or other hard surfaced areas except where necessary for public health or safety.
3 Landscape - Limit landscape
irrigation to specific days 5-10% Limit to assigned watering days, may depend on seasonal changes as well such as summer and winter. 3 Water Features - Restrict water
use for decorative water features 0-1% Prohibit use of potable water to fill or maintain decorative fountains and water features unless located in indoors or home to aquatic life. 3 Other water feature or swimming
pool restriction 0-1% Restrict draining and refiling of pools 3 Other 0-1% Limit the use of potable water hydrant meters, except as exempted by the Public Works Director
4 Landscape - Other landscape
restriction or prohibition 5-10% Restrict irrigation to high efficiency methods 4 Landscape - Other landscape
restriction or prohibition 5-20% Restrict irrigation to watering by hand only 4 Landscape - Other landscape
restriction or prohibition 5-20% Prohibit/restrict irrigation of turf 4 Other 20-40% Prohibit all outdoor water use
4 Other 20-70% Institute water rationing
4 Moratorium or Net Zero New
Demand 0-1% The City may temporarily limit or ban new water service connections within the service area.

Submittal Table 8-3 Retail: Demand Reduction Actions | Water Code Section 10632(a)(4)(B) and (E) Is the Supplier completing this table using the standard six levels? (yes/no) City Name 60 Day Notice Notice of Public Hearing
City of Santa Barbara Yes Yes
County Name
Drop Down List 60 Day Notice Notice of Public Hearing
Santa Barbara County Yes Yes
Other 60 Day Notice Notice of Public Hearing
Cachuma Operation and Maintenance
Board Yes Yes
Central Coast Water Authority Yes Yes
United States Bureau of Reclamation Yes Yes
Goleta Water District Yes Yes
Montecito Water District Yes Yes
Carpinteria Valley Water District Yes Yes
Santa Ynez River Water Conservation
District, Improvement District No. 1 Yes Yes
NOTES:

Submittal Table 10-1 Retail: Notification to Cities and Counties | Water Code Section 10621(b) and 10642
City of Santa Barbara Consistency with the Delta Plan
2025 Urban Water Management Plan | C
Appendix C Consistency with the Delta
Plan
C
City of Santa Barbara 2025 UWMP
App C - Delta Reliance_05.04.2026 C-1
2025 UWMP APPENDIX C: QUANTIFYING REGIONAL SELF-RELIANCE AND

REDUCED RELIANCE ON WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE DELTA

WATERSHED
1 Background
Under the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009, state and local public agencies proposing a covered action in the Delta, prior to initiating the implementation of that action, must prepare a written certification of consistency with detailed findings as to whether the covered action is consistent with applicable Delta Plan policies and submit that certification to the Delta Stewardship Council. Anyone may appeal a certification of consistency, and if the Delta Stewardship Council grants the appeal, the covered action may not be implemented until the agency proposing the covered action submits a revised certification of consistency, and either no appeal is filed, or the Delta Stewardship Council denies the subsequent appeal.

An urban water supplier that anticipates participating in or receiving water from a proposed covered action such as a multi-year water transfer, conveyance facility, or new diversion that involves transferring water through, exporting water from, or using water in the Delta should provide information in their 2015 and subsequent Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs) that can then be used in the covered action process to demonstrate consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance (WR P1).

WR P1 details what is needed for a covered action to demonstrate consistency with reduced reliance on the Delta and improved regional self-reliance. WR P1 subsection (a) states that:
(a) Water shall not be exported from, transferred through, or used in the Delta if all of the following apply:
(1) One or more water suppliers that would receive water as a result of the export, transfer, or use have failed to adequately contribute to reduced reliance on the Delta and improved regional self-reliance consistent with all of the requirements listed in paragraph (1) of subsection (c);
(2) That failure has significantly caused the need for the export, transfer, or use; and (3) The export, transfer, or use would have a significant adverse environmental impact in the Delta.

WR P1 subsection (c)(1) further defines what adequately contributing to reduced reliance on the Delta means in terms of (a)(1) above.
(c)(1) Water suppliers that have done all the following are contributing to reduced reliance on the Delta and improved regional self-reliance and are therefore consistent with this policy:
(A) Completed a current Urban or Agricultural Water Management Plan (Plan) which has been reviewed by the California Department of Water Resources for compliance with the applicable requirements of Water Code Division 6, Parts 2.55, 2.6, and 2.8; City of Santa Barbara 2025 UWMP
App C - Delta Reliance_05.04.2026 C-2
(B) Identified, evaluated, and commenced implementation, consistent with the implementation schedule set forth in the Plan, of all programs and projects included in the Plan that are locally cost effective and technically feasible which reduce reliance on the Delta; and
(C) Included in the Plan, commencing in 2015, the expected outcome for measurable reduction in Delta reliance and improvement in regional self-reliance. The expected outcome for measurable reduction in Delta reliance and improvement in regional selfreliance shall be reported in the Plan as the reduction in the amount of water used, or in the percentage of water used, from the Delta watershed. For the purposes of reporting, water efficiency is considered a new source of water supply, consistent with Water Code section 1011(a).

The analysis and documentation provided below include all the elements described in WR P1(c)(1) that need to be included in a water supplier’s UWMP to support a certification of consistency for a future covered action.
2 Methodology
As stated in WR P1(c)(1)(C), the policy requires that, commencing in 2015, UWMPs include expected outcomes for improved regional self-reliance and measurable reduction in Delta reliance. WR P1 further states that those outcomes shall be reported in the UWMP as the reduction in the amount of water used, or in the percentage of water used, from the Delta. The expected outcomes for City of Santa Barbara’s (City’s) regional self-reliance and reduced Delta reliance were developed using the approach and guidance described in Appendix C of DWR’s Urban Water Management Plan Guidebook 2025 issued in 2026 (Guidebook Appendix C).

The methodology used to determine City’s improved regional self-reliance and reduced Delta reliance is consistent with the approach detailed in DWR’s UWMP Guidebook Appendix C, including the use of narrative justifications for the accounting of supplies and the documentation of specific data sources.

Some of the key assumptions include:
• All data were obtained from the current 2025 UWMP or previously adopted UWMPs and represent average or normal water year conditions.
• All analyses were conducted at the service area level, and all data reflect the total contributions of City and its customers as well as their customers.

To calculate the expected outcomes for improved regional self-reliance and reduced Delta reliance, a baseline is needed to compare against. This analysis uses a normal water year representation of 2010 as the baseline, which is consistent with the approach described in the Guidebook Appendix C. Data for the 2010 baseline were taken from City’s 2005 UWMP as the UWMPs generally do not provide normal water year data for the year that they are adopted (i.e., 2005 UWMP forecasts begin in 2010, 2010 UWMP forecasts begin in 2015, and so on).

Consistent with the 2010 baseline data approach, the expected outcomes for improved regional selfreliance and reduced Delta reliance for 2015, 2020, and 2025 were taken from City’s 2010, 2015, and City of Santa Barbara 2025 UWMP
App C - Delta Reliance_05.04.2026 C-3
2020 UWMPs, respectively. Expected outcomes for 2030-2050 are from the current 2025 UWMP.

Documentation of the specific data sources and assumptions are included in the discussions below. 3 Demonstration of Regional Self-Reliance
Service Area Demands without Water Use Efficiency
In alignment with the Guidebook Appendix C, this analysis uses normal water year demands, rather than normal water year supplies to calculate expected outcomes in terms of the percentage of water used.

Using normal water year demands serves as a proxy for the amount of supplies that would be used in a normal water year, which helps alleviate issues associated with how supply capability is presented to fulfill requirements of the UWMP Act versus how supplies might be accounted for to demonstrate consistency with WR P1.

Because WR P1 considers water use efficiency savings a source of water supply, water suppliers such as City that do not explicitly quantify water use efficiency savings in their UWMPs can calculate their embedded water use efficiency savings based on changes in forecasted per capita water use since the baseline.

Agencies that explicitly calculate and report water use efficiency savings in their UWMP will need to make an adjustment to properly reflect normal water year demands in the calculation of reduced reliance. As explained in the Guidebook Appendix C, water use efficiency savings must be added back to the normal year demands to represent demands without water use efficiency savings accounted for; otherwise the effect of water use efficiency savings on regional self-reliance would be overestimated. Table 1 shows the results of this adjustment for City. Supporting narratives and documentation for all the data shown in Table 1 are provided below.

Service Area Demands with Water Use Efficiency
The service area demands shown in Table 1 represent the total water demands for City’s service area.

The demand data shown in Table 1 were collected from the following sources:
• Baseline (2010): City 2005 UWMP, Figure 9
• 2015: City 2010 UWMP, Table 6
• 2020: City 2015 UWMP, 3
• 2025: City 2020 UWMP, Table 5
• 2030-2050: City 2025 UWMP, Table 4-3
Service Area Population
The population data shown in Table 1 were collected from the following sources:
• Baseline (2010): City 2015 UWMP, Table 2
• 2015: City 2015 UWMP, Table 2
• 2020: City 2020 UWMP, Table 3
• 2025-2050: City 2025 UWMP, Table 3-2
City of Santa Barbara 2025 UWMP
App C - Delta Reliance_05.04.2026 C-4
Estimated Water Use Efficiency Since Baseline
Calculated using “Potable Service Area Demands with Water Use Efficiency” divided by “Service Area Population” and then calculating Estimated Water Use Efficiency Since Baseline by comparing with 2010 Per Capita Water Use.

Service Area Water Demands without Water Use Efficiency Add “Service Area Demands with Water Use Efficiency” to “Estimated Water Use Efficiency Since Baseline.”
Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance
For a covered action to demonstrate consistency with the Delta Plan, WR P1 subsection (c)(1)(C) states that water suppliers must report the expected outcomes for measurable improvement in regional selfreliance. Table 2 shows expected outcomes for supplies contributing to regional self-reliance both in amount and as a percentage. The numbers shown in Table 2 represent efforts to improve regional selfreliance for City’s entire service area. Supporting narratives and documentation for all of the data shown in Table 2 are provided below.

Water Use Efficiency
The water use efficiency information shown in Table 2 is taken directly from Table 1.

Water Recycling
The water recycling information shown in Table 2 is taken directly from Table 1.

Advanced Water Technologies
The advanced water technologies data shown in Table 2 represent projected normal year supply of desalination. Prior to the 2020 UWMP, use of desalination was only planned on for extended drought or emergency conditions. Starting during the 2020 UWMP, desalination is now considered part of the City’s water supply portfolio to support drought preparedness, response, and recovery. Based on this information, desalination data was estimated from the following sources:
• Baseline (2010): City 2005 UWMP, Page 15
• 2015: City 2010 UWMP, Page 27
• 2020: City 2015 UWMP, Page 48
• 2020: City 2020 UWMP, Table 12
• 2030-2050: City 2025 UWMP, Table 6-6
Local and Regional Water Supply and Storage Programs
The local and regional water supply and storage programs data shown in Table 2 represent average annual supply projections by the City for the Cachuma Project, Gibraltar Reservoir, Mission Tunnel, and Devil’s Creek. Based on this information, groundwater pumping data was estimated from the following sources:

City of Santa Barbara 2025 UWMP
App C - Delta Reliance_05.04.2026 C-5
• Baseline (2010): City 2005 UWMP, Pages 7 to 10
• 2015: City 2010 UWMP, Table 12
• 2020: City 2015 UWMP, Table 15
• 2025: City 2020 UWMP, Table 12
• 2030-2050: City 2025 UWMP, Table 6-6
Other Programs and Projects the Contribute to Regional Self-Reliance The Other Programs and Projects the Contribute to Regional Self-Reliance data shown in Table 2 represent groundwater pumping perennial yield estimates by the City for 2010-2025 and the established safe yield for 2030-2050. The City worked with USGS to update the safe yield of their groundwater basins in 2024. Based on this information, groundwater pumping data was estimated from the following sources:
• Baseline (2010): City 2005 UWMP, Page 11
• 2015: City 2010 UWMP, Table 12
• 2020: City 2015 UWMP, Table 15
• 2025: City 2020 UWMP, Table 12
• 2030-2050: City 2025 UWMP, Table 6-6
Conclusions
The results shown in Table 2 demonstrate that City’s service area is measurably improving its regional self-reliance, both as an amount of water used and as a percentage of water used. The following provides a summary of the near-term (2030) and long-term (2050) expected outcomes for City’s Delta reliance on supplies from the Delta watershed:
• Near-term (2030): Normal water year regional self-reliance increased by 5,400 AF from the 2010 baseline, this represents an increase of 30 percent of 2030 normal water year demands without water use efficiency (Table 2).
• Long-term (2045): Normal water year regional self-reliance increased by 6,000 AF from the 2010 baseline, this represents an increase of 30 percent of 2050 normal water year demands without water use efficiency (Table 2).
4 Demonstration of Reduced Reliance on the Delta
City’s service area reduces reliance on the Delta through investments in non-Delta water supplies, local water supplies, and regional and local demand management measures. For reduced reliance on supplies from the Delta Watershed, the data used in this analysis represent the total regional efforts of the City.

Calculation of Reliance on Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed The calculation of reliance on water supplies from the Delta watershed, shown in Table 3, is based on the following assumptions. City water supplies from the Delta watershed include:
• CVP/SWP Contract Supplies
City of Santa Barbara 2025 UWMP
App C - Delta Reliance_05.04.2026 C-6
CVP/SWP Contract Supplies
The supply data shown in Table 3 is for City’s SWP Table A allocation and were collected from the following sources:
• Baseline (2010): The 2009 State Water Project Delivery Capability Report that identified an average SWP reliability of 60%. This baseline source is recommended by the Central Coast Water Authority.
• 2015: City 2010 UWMP, Page 25
• 2020: City 2015 UWMP, Table 15
• 2025: City 2020 UWMP, Table 12
• 2030-2050: City 2025 UWMP, Table 6-6
Change in Supplies from the Delta Watershed
Adds “CVP/SWP Contract Supplies” and “Other Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed” to get total Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed and calculates changes from the 2010 baseline.

Percent Change in Supplies from the Delta Watershed
Divides “Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed” by “Service Area Demands without Water Use Efficiency” and calculates changes from the 2010 baseline.

Conclusions
The results shown in Table 3 show that the City is measurably reducing reliance on the Delta, both as an amount of water used and as a percentage of water used. The following provides a summary of the nearterm (2030) and long-term (2050) expected outcomes for City’s Delta reliance on supplies from the Delta watershed:
• Near-term (2030): Normal water year reliance on supplies from the Delta watershed decreased by 244 AF from the 2010 baseline, this represents a decrease of two percent of 2030 normal water year demands without water use efficiency (Table 3). • Long-term (2050): Normal water year reliance on supplies from the Delta watershed decreased by 437 AF from the 2010 baseline, this represents a decrease of four percent of 2050 normal water year demands without water use efficiency (Table 3). 5 UWMP Implementation
In addition to the analysis and documentation described above, WR P1 subsection (c)(1)(B) requires that all programs and projects included in the UWMP that are locally cost-effective and technically feasible, which reduce reliance on the Delta, are identified, evaluated, and implemented consistent with the implementation schedule. WR P1 (c)(1)(B) states that:
(B) Identified, evaluated, and commenced implementation, consistent with the implementation schedule set forth in the Plan, of all programs and projects included in the Plan that are locally cost effective and technically feasible which reduce reliance on the Delta[.] City of Santa Barbara 2025 UWMP
App C - Delta Reliance_05.04.2026 C-7
In accordance with Water Code Section 10631(f), water suppliers must already include in their UWMP a detailed description of expected future projects and programs that they may implement to increase the amount of water supply available to them in normal and single-dry water years and for a period of drought lasting five consecutive years. The UWMP description must also identify specific projects, include a description of the increase in water supply that is expected to be available from each project, and include an estimate regarding the implementation timeline for each project or program.

Chapter 6 of City’s 2025 UWMP summarizes the implementation plan and continued progress in developing a diversified water portfolio to meet the region’s water needs.

City of Santa Barbara 2025 UWMP
App C - Delta Reliance_05.04.2026 C-8
Table 1. Calculation of Service Area Water Demands without Water Use Efficiency (UWMP Table C-1 and Table C-2) Table C-1: Optional Calculation of Water Use Efficiency -To be completed if Water Supplier does not specifically estimate Water Use Efficiency as a supply Service Area Water Use Efficiency Demands
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Service Area Water Demands with Water Use Efficiency Accounted For 14,200 13,310 13,176 12,669 10,480 10,468 10,443 10,405 10,398 Non-Potable Water Demands 800 875 950 1,221 1,020 1,020 1,020 1,020 1,020 Potable Service Area Demands with Water Use Efficiency Accounted For 13,400 12,435 12,226 11,448 9,460 9,448 9,423 9,385 9,378 Total Service Area Population
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Service Area Population 91,114 # 93,532 96,027 93,334 94,592 95,868 97,160 97,617 98,078 Water Use Efficiency Since Baseline
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Per Capita Water Use (GPCD) 131 119 114 110 89 88 87 86 85 Change in Per Capita Water Use from Baseline (GPCD) (13) (18) (22) (42) (43) (45) (45) (46) Estimated Water Use Efficiency Since Baseline 1,321 1,897 2,278 4,452 4,651 4,866 4,971 5,046 Table C-2: Calculation of Service Area Water Demands Without Water Use Efficiency Total Service Area Water Demands
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Service Area Water Demands with Water Use Efficiency Accounted For 14,200 13,310 13,176 12,669 10,480 10,468 10,443 10,405 10,398 Reported Water Use Efficiency or Estimated Water Use Efficiency Since Baseline - 1,321 1,897 2,278 4,452 4,651 4,866 4,971 5,046 Service Area Water Demands without Water Use Efficiency Accounted For 14,200 14,631 15,073 14,947 14,932 15,119 15,309 15,376 15,444 City of Santa Barbara 2025 UWMP
App C - Delta Reliance_05.04.2026 C-9
Table 2. Calculation of Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance (UWMP Table C-3) Table C-3: Calculation of Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance Water Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Water Use Efficiency - 1,321 1,897 2,278 4,452 4,651 4,866 4,971 5,046 Water Recycling 800 875 950 1,221 1,020 1,020 1,020 1,020 1,020 Stormwater Capture and Use
Advanced Water Technologies - - - 3,125 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Conjunctive Use Projects
Local and Regional Water Supply and Storage Projects 14,345 12,503 12,503 12,997 13,029 13,029 13,029 13,029 13,029 Other Programs and Projects the Contribute to Regional Self-Reliance 1,400 1,083 1,083 1,250 972 972 972 972 972 Water Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance 16,545 15,782 16,433 20,871 21,973 22,172 22,387 22,492 22,567 Service Area Water Demands without Water Use Efficiency (Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Service Area Water Demands without Water Use Efficiency Accounted For 14,200 14,631 15,073 14,947 14,932 15,119 15,309 15,376 15,444 Change in Regional Self Reliance
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Water Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance 16,545 15,782 16,433 20,871 21,973 22,172 22,387 22,492 22,567 Change in Water Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance (763) (112) 4,326 5,428 5,627 5,842 5,947 6,022 Percent Change in Regional Self Reliance
(As Percent of Demand w/out WUE)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Percent of Water Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance 116.5% 107.9% 109.0% 139.6% 147.2% 146.6% 146.2% 146.3% 146.1% Change in Percent of Water Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance -8.6% -7.5% 23.1% 30.6% 30.1% 29.7% 29.8% 29.6% City of Santa Barbara 2025 UWMP
App C - Delta Reliance_05.04.2026 C-10
Table 3. Reliance on Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed (UWMP Table C-4) Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
CVP/SWP Contract Supplies 1,980 1,980 2,001 1,865 1,736 1,688 1,639 1,591 1,543 Delta/Delta Tributary Diversions
Transfers and Exchanges of Supplies from the Delta Watershed Other Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed
Total Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed 1,980 1,980 2,001 1,865 1,736 1,688 1,639 1,591 1,543 Service Area Water Demands without Water Use Efficiency (Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Service Area Water Demands without Water Use Efficiency Accounted For 14,200 14,631 15,073 14,947 14,932 15,119 15,309 15,376 15,444 Change in Supplies from the Delta Watershed
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed 1,980 1,980 2,001 1,865 1,736 1,688 1,639 1,591 1,543 Change in Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed - 21 (115) (244) (292) (341) (389) (437) Percent Change in Supplies from the Delta Watershed
(As a Percent of Demand w/out WUE)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Percent of Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed 13.9% 13.5% 13.3% 12.5% 11.6% 11.2% 10.7% 10.3% 10.0% Change in Percent of Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed -0.4% -0.7% -1.5% -2.3% -2.8% -3.2% -3.6% -4.0% City of Santa Barbara Documentation of Public Noticing, Coordination, and Adoption
2025 Urban Water Management Plan | D
Appendix D Documentation of Public
Noticing, Coordination, and
Adoption
D
January 15, 2026
Ray Stokes
Executive Director
Central Coast Water Authority
[email protected]
Delivered Via Email
Subject: Notice of Preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Shortage Contingency Plan
Dear Ray Stokes:

The City of Santa Barbara (City) is in the process of preparing its 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) in compliance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act. An update of the City’s UWMP is required every five (5) years. In addition, the City is preparing an Appendix to the 2025 UWMP to demonstrate consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance (California Code Reg., tit.23, §5003).

Water Code section 10621(b) requires an urban water supplier updating its UWMP and WSCP to notify cities and counties within its service area of the update at least sixty (60) days prior to holding a public hearing thereby encouraging public involvement and agency coordination. This letter serves as the City’s notice that it is preparing and updating its 2025 UWMP and WSCP.

The City’s draft 2025 UWMP and WSCP will be available for review prior to the public hearing and adoption meeting at: SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision.

The City will subsequently hold a noticed public hearing to hear public comments and consider adoption of the plan in 2026. You will be notified when the draft 2025 UWMP is complete and ready for public review and comment.

The City invites you to submit comments and consult with the City regarding its UWMP and WSCP. If you have any questions, comments, or input, please contact Jasmine Showers, Water Resources Analyst, via email at [email protected] or by phone at (805) 897-2646.

Sincerely,
Dakota Corey.

Water Supply and Services Manager
DC:js
January 15, 2026
David Beard
Deputy Director of Operations and Engineering
Central Coast Water Authority
[email protected]
Delivered Via Email
Subject: Notice of Preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Shortage Contingency Plan
Dear David Beard:

The City of Santa Barbara (City) is in the process of preparing its 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) in compliance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act. An update of the City’s UWMP is required every five (5) years. In addition, the City is preparing an Appendix to the 2025 UWMP to demonstrate consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance (California Code Reg., tit.23, §5003).

Water Code section 10621(b) requires an urban water supplier updating its UWMP and WSCP to notify cities and counties within its service area of the update at least sixty (60) days prior to holding a public hearing thereby encouraging public involvement and agency coordination. This letter serves as the City’s notice that it is preparing and updating its 2025 UWMP and WSCP.

The City’s draft 2025 UWMP and WSCP will be available for review prior to the public hearing and adoption meeting at: SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision.

The City will subsequently hold a noticed public hearing to hear public comments and consider adoption of the plan in 2026. You will be notified when the draft 2025 UWMP is complete and ready for public review and comment.

The City invites you to submit comments and consult with the City regarding its UWMP and WSCP. If you have any questions, comments, or input, please contact Jasmine Showers, Water Resources Analyst, via email at [email protected] or by phone at (805) 897-2646.

Sincerely,
Dakota Corey.

Water Supply and Services Manager
DC:js
January 15, 2026
Janet Gingras
General Manager
Cachuma Operation and Maintenance Board
[email protected]
Delivered Via Email
Subject: Notice of Preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Shortage Contingency Plan
Dear Janet Gingras:

The City of Santa Barbara (City) is in the process of preparing its 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) in compliance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act. An update of the City’s UWMP is required every five (5) years. In addition, the City is preparing an Appendix to the 2025 UWMP to demonstrate consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance (California Code Reg., tit.23, §5003).

Water Code section 10621(b) requires an urban water supplier updating its UWMP and WSCP to notify cities and counties within its service area of the update at least sixty (60) days prior to holding a public hearing thereby encouraging public involvement and agency coordination. This letter serves as the City’s notice that it is preparing and updating its 2025 UWMP and WSCP.

The City’s draft 2025 UWMP and WSCP will be available for review prior to the public hearing and adoption meeting at: SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision.

The City will subsequently hold a noticed public hearing to hear public comments and consider adoption of the plan in 2026. You will be notified when the draft 2025 UWMP is complete and ready for public review and comment.

The City invites you to submit comments and consult with the City regarding its UWMP and WSCP. If you have any questions, comments, or input, please contact Jasmine Showers, Water Resources Analyst, via email at [email protected] or by phone at (805) 897-2646.

Sincerely,
Dakota Corey.

Water Supply and Services Manager
DC:js
January 15, 2026
Matt Young
Water Agency Manager
Santa Barbara County Water Agency
[email protected]
Delivered Via Email
Subject: Notice of Preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Shortage Contingency Plan
Dear Matt Young:

The City of Santa Barbara (City) is in the process of preparing its 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) in compliance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act. An update of the City’s UWMP is required every five (5) years. In addition, the City is preparing an Appendix to the 2025 UWMP to demonstrate consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance (California Code Reg., tit.23, §5003).

Water Code section 10621(b) requires an urban water supplier updating its UWMP and WSCP to notify cities and counties within its service area of the update at least sixty (60) days prior to holding a public hearing thereby encouraging public involvement and agency coordination. This letter serves as the City’s notice that it is preparing and updating its 2025 UWMP and WSCP.

The City’s draft 2025 UWMP and WSCP will be available for review prior to the public hearing and adoption meeting at: SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision.

The City will subsequently hold a noticed public hearing to hear public comments and consider adoption of the plan in 2026. You will be notified when the draft 2025 UWMP is complete and ready for public review and comment.

The City invites you to submit comments and consult with the City regarding its UWMP and WSCP. If you have any questions, comments, or input, please contact Jasmine Showers, Water Resources Analyst, via email at [email protected] or by phone at (805) 897-2646.

Sincerely,
Dakota Corey.

Water Supply and Services Manager
DC:js
January 15, 2026
Rain Emmerson
Acting Area Manager
United States Bureau of Reclamation
[email protected]
Delivered Via Email
Subject: Notice of Preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Shortage Contingency Plan
Dear Rain Emmerson:

The City of Santa Barbara (City) is in the process of preparing its 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) in compliance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act. An update of the City’s UWMP is required every five (5) years. In addition, the City is preparing an Appendix to the 2025 UWMP to demonstrate consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance (California Code Reg., tit.23, §5003).

Water Code section 10621(b) requires an urban water supplier updating its UWMP and WSCP to notify cities and counties within its service area of the update at least sixty (60) days prior to holding a public hearing thereby encouraging public involvement and agency coordination. This letter serves as the City’s notice that it is preparing and updating its 2025 UWMP and WSCP.

The City’s draft 2025 UWMP and WSCP will be available for review prior to the public hearing and adoption meeting at: SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision.

The City will subsequently hold a noticed public hearing to hear public comments and consider adoption of the plan in 2026. You will be notified when the draft 2025 UWMP is complete and ready for public review and comment.

The City invites you to submit comments and consult with the City regarding its UWMP and WSCP. If you have any questions, comments, or input, please contact Jasmine Showers, Water Resources Analyst, via email at [email protected] or by phone at (805) 897-2646.

Sincerely,
Dakota Corey.

Water Supply and Services Manager
DC:js
January 15, 2026
Nicholas Turner
General Manager
Montecito Water District
[email protected]
Delivered Via Email
Subject: Notice of Preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Shortage Contingency Plan
Dear Nicholas Turner:

The City of Santa Barbara (City) is in the process of preparing its 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) in compliance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act. An update of the City’s UWMP is required every five (5) years. In addition, the City is preparing an Appendix to the 2025 UWMP to demonstrate consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance (California Code Reg., tit.23, §5003).

Water Code section 10621(b) requires an urban water supplier updating its UWMP and WSCP to notify cities and counties within its service area of the update at least sixty (60) days prior to holding a public hearing thereby encouraging public involvement and agency coordination. This letter serves as the City’s notice that it is preparing and updating its 2025 UWMP and WSCP.

The City’s draft 2025 UWMP and WSCP will be available for review prior to the public hearing and adoption meeting at: SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision.

The City will subsequently hold a noticed public hearing to hear public comments and consider adoption of the plan in 2026. You will be notified when the draft 2025 UWMP is complete and ready for public review and comment.

The City invites you to submit comments and consult with the City regarding its UWMP and WSCP. If you have any questions, comments, or input, please contact Jasmine Showers, Water Resources Analyst, via email at [email protected] or by phone at (805) 897-2646.

Sincerely,
Dakota Corey.

Water Supply and Services Manager
DC:js
January 15, 2026
Robert T. McDonald
General Manager
Carpinteria Valley Water District
[email protected]
Delivered Via Email
Subject: Notice of Preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Shortage Contingency Plan
Dear Robert T. McDonald:

The City of Santa Barbara (City) is in the process of preparing its 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) in compliance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act. An update of the City’s UWMP is required every five (5) years. In addition, the City is preparing an Appendix to the 2025 UWMP to demonstrate consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance (California Code Reg., tit.23, §5003).

Water Code section 10621(b) requires an urban water supplier updating its UWMP and WSCP to notify cities and counties within its service area of the update at least sixty (60) days prior to holding a public hearing thereby encouraging public involvement and agency coordination. This letter serves as the City’s notice that it is preparing and updating its 2025 UWMP and WSCP.

The City’s draft 2025 UWMP and WSCP will be available for review prior to the public hearing and adoption meeting at: SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision.

The City will subsequently hold a noticed public hearing to hear public comments and consider adoption of the plan in 2026. You will be notified when the draft 2025 UWMP is complete and ready for public review and comment.

The City invites you to submit comments and consult with the City regarding its UWMP and WSCP. If you have any questions, comments, or input, please contact Jasmine Showers, Water Resources Analyst, via email at [email protected] or by phone at (805) 897-2646.

Sincerely,
Dakota Corey.

Water Supply and Services Manager
DC:js
January 15, 2026
Kelley Dyer
General Manager
Carpinteria Valley Water District
[email protected]
Delivered Via Email
Subject: Notice of Preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Shortage Contingency Plan
Dear Kelley Dyer:

The City of Santa Barbara (City) is in the process of preparing its 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) in compliance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act. An update of the City’s UWMP is required every five (5) years. In addition, the City is preparing an Appendix to the 2025 UWMP to demonstrate consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance (California Code Reg., tit.23, §5003).

Water Code section 10621(b) requires an urban water supplier updating its UWMP and WSCP to notify cities and counties within its service area of the update at least sixty (60) days prior to holding a public hearing thereby encouraging public involvement and agency coordination. This letter serves as the City’s notice that it is preparing and updating its 2025 UWMP and WSCP.

The City’s draft 2025 UWMP and WSCP will be available for review prior to the public hearing and adoption meeting at: SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision.

The City will subsequently hold a noticed public hearing to hear public comments and consider adoption of the plan in 2026. You will be notified when the draft 2025 UWMP is complete and ready for public review and comment.

The City invites you to submit comments and consult with the City regarding its UWMP and WSCP. If you have any questions, comments, or input, please contact Jasmine Showers, Water Resources Analyst, via email at [email protected] or by phone at (805) 897-2646.

Sincerely,
Dakota Corey.

Water Supply and Services Manager
DC:js
January 15, 2026
Paeter Garcia
General Manager
Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District, Improvement District No. 1 [email protected]
Delivered Via Email
Subject: Notice of Preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Shortage Contingency Plan
Dear Paeter Garcia:

The City of Santa Barbara (City) is in the process of preparing its 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) in compliance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act. An update of the City’s UWMP is required every five (5) years. In addition, the City is preparing an Appendix to the 2025 UWMP to demonstrate consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance (California Code Reg., tit.23, §5003).

Water Code section 10621(b) requires an urban water supplier updating its UWMP and WSCP to notify cities and counties within its service area of the update at least sixty (60) days prior to holding a public hearing thereby encouraging public involvement and agency coordination. This letter serves as the City’s notice that it is preparing and updating its 2025 UWMP and WSCP.

The City’s draft 2025 UWMP and WSCP will be available for review prior to the public hearing and adoption meeting at: SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision.

The City will subsequently hold a noticed public hearing to hear public comments and consider adoption of the plan in 2026. You will be notified when the draft 2025 UWMP is complete and ready for public review and comment.

The City invites you to submit comments and consult with the City regarding its UWMP and WSCP. If you have any questions, comments, or input, please contact Jasmine Showers, Water Resources Analyst, via email at [email protected] or by phone at (805) 897-2646.

Sincerely,
Dakota Corey.

Water Supply and Services Manager
DC:js
January 15, 2026
David Matson
General Manager
Goleta Water District
[email protected]
Delivered Via Email
Subject: Notice of Preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Shortage Contingency Plan
Dear David Matson:

The City of Santa Barbara (City) is in the process of preparing its 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) in compliance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act. An update of the City’s UWMP is required every five (5) years. In addition, the City is preparing an Appendix to the 2025 UWMP to demonstrate consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance (California Code Reg., tit.23, §5003).

Water Code section 10621(b) requires an urban water supplier updating its UWMP and WSCP to notify cities and counties within its service area of the update at least sixty (60) days prior to holding a public hearing thereby encouraging public involvement and agency coordination. This letter serves as the City’s notice that it is preparing and updating its 2025 UWMP and WSCP.

The City’s draft 2025 UWMP and WSCP will be available for review prior to the public hearing and adoption meeting at: SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision.

The City will subsequently hold a noticed public hearing to hear public comments and consider adoption of the plan in 2026. You will be notified when the draft 2025 UWMP is complete and ready for public review and comment.

The City invites you to submit comments and consult with the City regarding its UWMP and WSCP. If you have any questions, comments, or input, please contact Jasmine Showers, Water Resources Analyst, via email at [email protected] or by phone at (805) 897-2646.

Sincerely,
Dakota Corey.

Water Supply and Services Manager
DC:js
January 15, 2026
Ryan Drake
Water Supply and Conservation Manager
Goleta Water District
[email protected]
Delivered Via Email
Subject: Notice of Preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Shortage Contingency Plan
Dear Ryan Drake:

The City of Santa Barbara (City) is in the process of preparing its 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) in compliance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act. An update of the City’s UWMP is required every five (5) years. In addition, the City is preparing an Appendix to the 2025 UWMP to demonstrate consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance (California Code Reg., tit.23, §5003).

Water Code section 10621(b) requires an urban water supplier updating its UWMP and WSCP to notify cities and counties within its service area of the update at least sixty (60) days prior to holding a public hearing thereby encouraging public involvement and agency coordination. This letter serves as the City’s notice that it is preparing and updating its 2025 UWMP and WSCP.

The City’s draft 2025 UWMP and WSCP will be available for review prior to the public hearing and adoption meeting at: SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision.

The City will subsequently hold a noticed public hearing to hear public comments and consider adoption of the plan in 2026. You will be notified when the draft 2025 UWMP is complete and ready for public review and comment.

The City invites you to submit comments and consult with the City regarding its UWMP and WSCP. If you have any questions, comments, or input, please contact Jasmine Showers, Water Resources Analyst, via email at [email protected] or by phone at (805) 897-2646.

Sincerely,
Dakota Corey.

Water Supply and Services Manager
DC:js
March 27, 2026
Peter Cantle
Executive Director
Cachuma Conservation Release Board
[email protected]
Delivered Via Email
Subject: Notice of Preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Shortage Contingency Plan
Dear Peter Cantle:

The City of Santa Barbara (City) is in the process of preparing its 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) in compliance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act. An update of the City’s UWMP is required every five (5) years. In addition, the City is preparing an Appendix to the 2025 UWMP to demonstrate consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance (California Code Reg., tit.23, §5003).

Water Code section 10621(b) requires an urban water supplier updating its UWMP and WSCP to notify cities and counties within its service area of the update at least sixty (60) days prior to holding a public hearing thereby encouraging public involvement and agency coordination. This letter serves as the City’s notice that it is preparing and updating its 2025 UWMP and WSCP.

The City’s draft 2025 UWMP and WSCP will be available for review prior to the public hearing and adoption meeting at: SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision.

The City will subsequently hold a noticed public hearing to hear public comments and consider adoption of the plan in 2026. You will be notified when the draft 2025 UWMP is complete and ready for public review and comment.

The City invites you to submit comments and consult with the City regarding its UWMP and WSCP. If you have any questions, comments, or input, please contact Jasmine Showers, Water Resources Analyst, via email at [email protected] or by phone at (805) 897-2646.

Sincerely,
Dakota Corey.

Water Supply and Services Manager
DC:js

PUBLIC NOTICE
City of Santa Barbara
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Santa Barbara will conduct a Public Hearing on Tuesday, June 16, 2026 during the afternoon session of the meeting which begins at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 735 Anacapa Street, Santa Barbara. You are invited to attend this hearing and address your verbal comments to the City Council. Written comments are also welcome up to the time of the hearing, and should be addressed to the City Council via the City Clerk’s Office via email at [email protected], or by mail at P.O. Box 1990, Santa Barbara, CA 93102-1990.

Public comment may be given in person at the meeting or remotely via Zoom. Members of the public who wish to give public comment remotely may do so by completing the Zoom registration at the URL provided on the front page of the agenda.

On Thursday, June 11, 2026 an Agenda with all items to be heard on Tuesday, June 16, 2026, will be available at City Hall, 735 Anacapa Street, and at the Central Library.

Agendas and Staff Reports are also accessible online at http://www.santabarbaraca.gov/CAP. The Agenda includes instructions for participation in the meeting. If you wish to participate in the public hearing, please follow the instructions on the posted Agenda.

The hearing is to consider the adoption of the City of Santa Barbara 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and 2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan, according to the requirements of California Water Code Division 6, Part 2.6, Chapter 3, commencing with § 10620. A copy of the proposed Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan is available for public review online at www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision. The preparation and adoption of the Urban Water Management Plan is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under California Water Code § 10652.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need auxiliary aids or services or staff assistance to attend or participate in this meeting, please contact the City Administrator’s Office at 564-5305. If possible, notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will usually enable the City to make reasonable arrangements. Specialized services, such as sign language interpretation or documents in Braille, may require additional lead time to arrange.
(SEAL)

Sarah Gorman, MMC
City Clerk Services Manager
[Date of Posting]
Resolution to be included following adoption.

City of Santa Barbara FY21 to FY25 AWWA Water Audits
2025 Urban Water Management Plan | E
Appendix E FY21 to FY25 AWWA
Water Audits
E
Water Audit Report for:

Reporting Year:

All volumes to be entered as: ACRE-FEET PER YEAR
Master Meter and Supply Error Adjustments
WATER SUPPLIED Pcnt: Value:

Volume from own sources: 7 10,972.540 acre-ft/yr 3 acre-ft/yr Water imported: n/a acre-ft/yr acre-ft/yr
Water exported: n/a acre-ft/yr acre-ft/yr
Enter negative % or value for under-registration
WATER SUPPLIED: 10,972.540 acre-ft/yr Enter positive % or value for over-registration .

AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION
Billed metered: 5 9,674.090 acre-ft/yr
Billed unmetered: n/a acre-ft/yr
Unbilled metered: 9 145.390 acre-ft/yr Pcnt: Value:

Unbilled unmetered: 8 4.810 acre-ft/yr 1.25% 24061 acre-ft/yr AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION: 9,824.290 acre-ft/yr
WATER LOSSES (Water Supplied - Authorized Consumption) 1,148.250 acre-ft/yr Apparent Losses Pcnt: Value:

Unauthorized consumption: 27.431 acre-ft/yr 0.25% acre-ft/yr Customer metering inaccuracies: 5 96.030 acre-ft/yr acre-ft/yr Systematic data handling errors: 5 24.185 acre-ft/yr 0.25% acre-ft/yr Apparent Losses: 147.647 acre-ft/yr
Real Losses (Current Annual Real Losses or CARL)
Real Losses = Water Losses - Apparent Losses: 1,000.603 acre-ft/yr WATER LOSSES: 1,148.250 acre-ft/yr

NON-REVENUE WATER
NON-REVENUE WATER: 1,298.450 acre-ft/yr
= Water Losses + Unbilled Metered + Unbilled Unmetered

SYSTEM DATA
Length of mains: 9 322.2 miles
Number of active AND inactive service connections: 5 29,014 Service connection density: 90 conn./mile main
Yes
Average length of customer service line: ft
Average operating pressure: 4 119.5 psi

COST DATA
Total annual cost of operating water system: 10 $55,566,205 $/Year Customer retail unit cost (applied to Apparent Losses): 9 $9.70 Variable production cost (applied to Real Losses): 5 $289.00 $/acre-ft WATER AUDIT DATA VALIDITY SCORE:

PRIORITY AREAS FOR ATTENTION:
1: Volume from own sources
2: Billed metered
3: Customer metering inaccuracies
Average length of customer service line has been set to zero and a data grading score of 10 has been applied Are customer meters typically located at the curbstop or property line? AWWA Free Water Audit Software:

Reporting Worksheet

4.810
2021 7/2020 - 6/2021
City of Santa Barbara (CA4210010)
*** YOUR SCORE IS: 68 out of 100 ***
A weighted scale for the components of consumption and water loss is included in the calculation of the Water Audit Data Validity Score

96.030
Default option selected for Systematic data handling errors - a grading of 5 is applied but not displayed Based on the information provided, audit accuracy can be improved by addressing the following components:
$/100 cubic feet (ccf)
<----------- Enter grading in column 'E' and 'J' ----------> Default option selected for unauthorized consumption - a grading of 5 is applied but not displayed ?
?
?
?
?
? Click to access
?
?
?
?
?
?
Please enter data in the white cells below. Where available, metered values should be used; if metered values are unavailable please estimate a value. Indicate your confidence in the accuracy of the ?
?
?
?
?
?
(length of service line, beyond the property boundary,
that is the responsibility of the utility)
Use buttons to select percentage of water supplied OR
value Click here: ?
for help using option
?
?
?
?
+
+ Click to add a WAS +
+
+
+
+
+
American Water Works Association. ?
?
? +
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Use Customer Retail Unit Cost to value real losses
?
To select the correct data grading for each input, determine the highest grade where the utility meets or exceeds all criteria for that grade and all grades below it.

AWWA Free Water Audit Software v5.0 Reporting Worksheet 1 Water Audit Report for:

Reporting Year:

All volumes to be entered as: ACRE-FEET PER YEAR
Master Meter and Supply Error Adjustments
WATER SUPPLIED Pcnt: Value:

Volume from own sources: 7 10,378.880 acre-ft/yr 3 acre-ft/yr Water imported: n/a acre-ft/yr acre-ft/yr
Water exported: n/a acre-ft/yr acre-ft/yr
Enter negative % or value for under-registration
WATER SUPPLIED: 10,378.880 acre-ft/yr Enter positive % or value for over-registration .

AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION
Billed metered: 5 9,489.040 acre-ft/yr
Billed unmetered: n/a acre-ft/yr
Unbilled metered: 9 136.980 acre-ft/yr Pcnt: Value:

Unbilled unmetered: 9 6.013 acre-ft/yr 1.25% 24061 acre-ft/yr AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION: 9,632.033 acre-ft/yr
WATER LOSSES (Water Supplied - Authorized Consumption) 746.847 acre-ft/yr Apparent Losses Pcnt: Value:

Unauthorized consumption: 5 25.947 acre-ft/yr 0.25% acre-ft/yr Customer metering inaccuracies: 5 83.040 acre-ft/yr acre-ft/yr Systematic data handling errors: 5 23.723 acre-ft/yr 0.25% acre-ft/yr Apparent Losses: 132.710 acre-ft/yr
Real Losses (Current Annual Real Losses or CARL)
Real Losses = Water Losses - Apparent Losses: 614.137 acre-ft/yr WATER LOSSES: 746.847 acre-ft/yr

NON-REVENUE WATER
NON-REVENUE WATER: 889.840 acre-ft/yr
= Water Losses + Unbilled Metered + Unbilled Unmetered

SYSTEM DATA
Length of mains: 10 320.0 miles
Number of active AND inactive service connections: 5 29,001 Service connection density: 91 conn./mile main
Yes
Average length of customer service line: ft
Average operating pressure: 4 119.4 psi

COST DATA
Total annual cost of operating water system: 10 $61,994,576 $/Year Customer retail unit cost (applied to Apparent Losses): 9 $10.02 Variable production cost (applied to Real Losses): 5 $378.00 $/acre-ft WATER AUDIT DATA VALIDITY SCORE:

PRIORITY AREAS FOR ATTENTION:
1: Volume from own sources
2: Billed metered
3: Customer metering inaccuracies
Average length of customer service line has been set to zero and a data grading score of 10 has been applied Are customer meters typically located at the curbstop or property line? AWWA Free Water Audit Software:

Reporting Worksheet

6.013
2022 7/2021 - 6/2022
City of Santa Barbara (CA4210010)
*** YOUR SCORE IS: 69 out of 100 ***
A weighted scale for the components of consumption and water loss is included in the calculation of the Water Audit Data Validity Score

83.040
Default option selected for Systematic data handling errors - a grading of 5 is applied but not displayed Based on the information provided, audit accuracy can be improved by addressing the following components:
$/100 cubic feet (ccf)
<----------- Enter grading in column 'E' and 'J' ----------> Default option selected for unauthorized consumption - a grading of 5 is applied but not displayed ?
?
?
?
?
? Click to access definition
?
?
?
?
?
?
Please enter data in the white cells below. Where available, metered values should be used; if metered values are unavailable please estimate a value. Indicate your confidence in the accuracy of the input data by grading each component (n/a or 1-10) using the drop-down list to the left of the input cell. Hover the mouse over the cell to obtain a description of the grades ?
?
?
?
?
?
(length of service line, beyond the property
boundary, that is the responsibility of the utility)
Use buttons to select percentage of water
supplied OR
value Click here: ?
for help using option buttons below
?
?
?
?
+
+ Click to add a comment WAS v5.0 +
+
+
+
+
+
American Water Works Association. Copyright © 2014, All Rights Reserved. ? ?
? ++
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Use Customer Retail Unit Cost to value real losses
?
To select the correct data grading for each input, determine the highest grade where the utility meets or exceeds all criteria for that grade and all grades below it.

AWWA Free Water Audit Software v5.0 Reporting Worksheet 1 Water Audit Report for:

Audit Year:

All volumes to be entered as: ACRE-FEET PER YEAR
WATER SUPPLIED choose entry option:

VOS Volume from Own Sources: n g 7 9,553.400 Acre-ft/Yr n g 4 0.00% percent acre-ft/yr under-registration VOSEA WI Water Imported: n g n/a 0.000 Acre-ft/Yr n g n/a percent acre-ft/yr select….. WIEA WE Water Exported: n g n/a 0.000 Acre-ft/Yr n g n/a percent acre-ft/yr select….. WEEA 9,553.400 Acre-ft/Yr
.

AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION
BMAC Billed Metered: n g 8 8,644.088 Acre-ft/Yr
BUAC Billed Unmetered: n g n/a 0.000 Acre-ft/Yr
UMAC Unbilled Metered: n g 8 105.077 Acre-ft/Yr choose entry option:

UUAC Unbilled Unmetered: n g 8 8.720 Acre-ft/Yr 0.25% custom acre-ft/yr 24061 8,757.884 Acre-ft/Yr
WATER LOSSES 795.516 Acre-ft/Yr
Apparent Losses
Default option selected for Systematic Data Handling Errors, with automatic data grading of 3 choose entry option:

SDHE Systematic Data Handling Errors: n g 3 21.610 Acre-ft/Yr 0.25% default acre-ft/yr CMI Customer Metering Inaccuracies: n g 3 64.870 Acre-ft/Yr 1.00% volume acre-ft/yr under-registration UC Unauthorized Consumption: n g 3 21.610 Acre-ft/Yr 0.25% default acre-ft/yr Default option selected for Unauthorized Consumption, with automatic data grading of 3 108.090 Acre-ft/Yr
Real Losses
687.425 Acre-ft/Yr
795.516 Acre-ft/Yr

NON-REVENUE WATER
909.312 Acre-ft/Yr

SYSTEM DATA
Lm Length of mains: n g 10 338.0 miles (including fire hydrant lead lengths) Nc Number of service connections: n g 8 26,353 (active and inactive) Service connection density: 78 conn./mile main
Yes
Lp Average length of (private) customer service line: n g 10 ft (average distance between property line and meter) AOP Average Operating Pressure: n g 6 119.0 psi

COST DATA
CRUC Customer Retail Unit Charge: n g 7 $10.16
VPC Variable Production Cost: n g 9 $311.26 $/acre-ft $/yr (optional input) WATER AUDIT DATA VALIDITY TIER:
go to
dashboard
PRIORITY AREAS FOR ATTENTION TO IMPROVE DATA VALIDITY: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR TARGETS:

Based on the information provided, audit reliability can be most improved by addressing the following components: OPTIONAL: If targets exist for the operational performance indicators, they can be input below:
1: Volume from Own Sources (VOS) Unit Total Losses: 33.9 gal/conn/day 2: Customer Metering Inaccuracies (CMI) Unit Apparent Losses: 5.1 gal/conn/day 3: Billed Metered (BMAC) Unit Real LossesA
: 28.8 gal/conn/day
Unit Real LossesB: gal/mile/day
If entered above by user, targets will display on KPI gauges (see Dashboard) go to start page
NON-REVENUE WATER:

If entering an
Error Adjustment,
select under- or overregistration

64.870
WATER SUPPLIED:

AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION:

Apparent Losses:

Average length of customer service line has been set to zero and a data grading of 10 has been applied A weighted scale for the components of supply, consumption and water loss is included in the calculation of the Water Audit Data Validity Score *** The Water Audit Data Validity Score is in Tier III (51-70). See Dashboard tab for additional outputs. *** $/100 cubic feet (ccf)
$64,308,650
Total Annual Operating Cost
Are customer meters typically located at the curbstop/property line? AWWA Free Water Audit Software:

Worksheet

8.720
City of Santa Barbara
Jul 01 2022 - Jun 30 2023
Water Supplied Error Adjustments
2023 Fiscal
Real Losses:

WATER LOSSES:

Click 'g' to determine data validity grade Click 'n' to add notes FWAS v6.0 American Water Works Association. Copyright © 2020, All Rights Reserved. To access definitions, click the input name To edit water system info:

AWWA Free Water Audit Software v6.0 Worksheet 1
Water Audit Report for:

Audit Year:

All volumes to be entered as: ACRE-FEET PER YEAR
WATER SUPPLIED choose entry option:

VOS Volume from Own Sources: n g 7 9,613.145 Acre-ft/Yr n g 4 0.00% percent acre-ft/yr under-registration VOSEA WI Water Imported: n g n/a 0.000 Acre-ft/Yr n g n/a percent acre-ft/yr select….. WIEA WE Water Exported: n g n/a 0.000 Acre-ft/Yr n g n/a percent acre-ft/yr select….. WEEA 9,613.145 Acre-ft/Yr
.

AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION
BMAC Billed Metered: n g 8 8,454.776 Acre-ft/Yr
BUAC Billed Unmetered: n g n/a 0.000 Acre-ft/Yr
UMAC Unbilled Metered: n g 8 108.391 Acre-ft/Yr choose entry option:

UUAC Unbilled Unmetered: n g 8 8.720 Acre-ft/Yr 0.25% custom acre-ft/yr 24061 8,571.887 Acre-ft/Yr
WATER LOSSES 1,041.257 Acre-ft/Yr
Apparent Losses
Default option selected for Systematic Data Handling Errors, with automatic data grading of 3 choose entry option:

SDHE Systematic Data Handling Errors: n g 3 21.137 Acre-ft/Yr 0.25% default acre-ft/yr CMI Customer Metering Inaccuracies: n g 3 62.630 Acre-ft/Yr volume acre-ft/yr under-registration UC Unauthorized Consumption: n g 3 21.137 Acre-ft/Yr 0.25% default acre-ft/yr Default option selected for Unauthorized Consumption, with automatic data grading of 3 104.904 Acre-ft/Yr
Real Losses
936.354 Acre-ft/Yr
1,041.257 Acre-ft/Yr

NON-REVENUE WATER
1,158.369 Acre-ft/Yr

SYSTEM DATA
Lm Length of mains: n g 10 330.2 miles (including fire hydrant lead lengths) Nc Number of service connections: n g 8 26,303 (active and inactive) Service connection density: 80 conn./mile main
Yes
Lp Average length of (private) customer service line: n g 10 ft (average distance between property line and meter) AOP Average Operating Pressure: n g 6 119.0 psi

COST DATA
CRUC Customer Retail Unit Charge: n g 7 $10.67
VPC Variable Production Cost: n g 9 $328.82 $/acre-ft $/yr (optional input) WATER AUDIT DATA VALIDITY TIER:
go to
dashboard
PRIORITY AREAS FOR ATTENTION TO IMPROVE DATA VALIDITY: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR TARGETS:

Based on the information provided, audit reliability can be most improved by addressing the following components: OPTIONAL: If targets exist for the operational performance indicators, they can be input below:
1: Volume from Own Sources (VOS) Unit Total Losses: 33.9 gal/conn/day 2: Customer Metering Inaccuracies (CMI) Unit Apparent Losses: 5.1 gal/conn/day 3: Billed Metered (BMAC) Unit Real LossesA
: 28.8 gal/conn/day
Unit Real LossesB: gal/mile/day
If entered above by user, targets will display on KPI gauges (see Dashboard) go to start page
NON-REVENUE WATER:

If entering an
Error Adjustment,
select under- or overregistration

62.630
WATER SUPPLIED:

AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION:

Apparent Losses:

Average length of customer service line has been set to zero and a data grading of 10 has been applied A weighted scale for the components of supply, consumption and water loss is included in the calculation of the Water Audit Data Validity Score *** The Water Audit Data Validity Score is in Tier III (51-70). See Dashboard tab for additional outputs. *** $/100 cubic feet (ccf)
$70,099,401
Total Annual Operating Cost
Are customer meters typically located at the curbstop/property line? AWWA Free Water Audit Software:

Worksheet

8.720
City of Santa Barbara
Jul 01 2023 - Jun 30 2024
Water Supplied Error Adjustments
2024 Fiscal
Real Losses:

WATER LOSSES:

Click 'g' to determine data validity grade Click 'n' to add notes FWAS v6.0 American Water Works Association. Copyright © 2020, All Rights Reserved. To access definitions, click the input name To edit water system info:

AWWA Free Water Audit Software v6.0 Worksheet 1
Water Audit Report for:

Audit Year:

All volumes to be entered as: ACRE-FEET PER YEAR
WATER SUPPLIED choose entry option:

VOS Volume from Own Sources: n g 7 17,942.821 Acre-ft/Yr n g 8 0.00% percent acre-ft/yr select….. VOSEA WI Water Imported: n g n/a 0.000 Acre-ft/Yr n g n/a percent acre-ft/yr select….. WIEA WE Water Exported: n g 7 7,886.348 Acre-ft/Yr n g 3 0.00% percent acre-ft/yr select….. WEEA 10,056.473 Acre-ft/Yr
.

AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION
BMAC Billed Metered: n g 8 8,827.431 Acre-ft/Yr
BUAC Billed Unmetered: n g n/a 0.000 Acre-ft/Yr
UMAC Unbilled Metered: n g 8 809.645 Acre-ft/Yr choose entry option:

UUAC Unbilled Unmetered: n g 8 7.900 Acre-ft/Yr 0.25% custom acre-ft/yr 24061 9,644.975 Acre-ft/Yr
WATER LOSSES 411.498 Acre-ft/Yr
Apparent Losses
Default option selected for Systematic Data Handling Errors, with automatic data grading of 3 choose entry option:

SDHE Systematic Data Handling Errors: n g 3 22.069 Acre-ft/Yr 0.25% default acre-ft/yr CMI Customer Metering Inaccuracies: n g 3 71.846 Acre-ft/Yr 0.74% percent acre-ft/yr under-registration UC Unauthorized Consumption: n g 3 22.069 Acre-ft/Yr 0.25% default acre-ft/yr Default option selected for Unauthorized Consumption, with automatic data grading of 3 115.983 Acre-ft/Yr
Real Losses
295.514 Acre-ft/Yr
411.498 Acre-ft/Yr

NON-REVENUE WATER
1,229.042 Acre-ft/Yr

SYSTEM DATA
Lm Length of mains: n g 10 329.7 miles (including fire hydrant lead lengths) Nc Number of service connections: n g 8 26,238 (active and inactive) Service connection density: 80 conn./mile main
Yes
Lp Average length of (private) customer service line: n g 10 ft (average distance between property line and meter) AOP Average Operating Pressure: n g 6 117.8 psi

COST DATA
CRUC Customer Retail Unit Charge: n g 7 $11.79
VPC Variable Production Cost: n g 9 $245.11 $/acre-ft $/yr (optional input) WATER AUDIT DATA VALIDITY TIER:
go to
dashboard
PRIORITY AREAS FOR ATTENTION TO IMPROVE DATA VALIDITY: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR TARGETS:

Based on the information provided, audit reliability can be most improved by addressing the following components: OPTIONAL: If targets exist for the operational performance indicators, they can be input below:
1: Volume from Own Sources (VOS) Unit Total Losses: gal/conn/day 2: Customer Metering Inaccuracies (CMI) Unit Apparent Losses: gal/conn/day 3: Water Exported (WE) Unit Real LossesA
: gal/conn/day
Unit Real LossesB: gal/mile/day
If entered above by user, targets will display on KPI gauges (see Dashboard) Are customer meters typically located at the curbstop/property line? AWWA Free Water Audit Software:

Worksheet

7.900
City of Santa Barbara
Jul 01 2024 - Jun 30 2025
Water Supplied Error Adjustments
2025 Fiscal
Real Losses:

WATER LOSSES:

Average length of customer service line has been set to zero and a data grading of 10 has been applied A weighted scale for the components of supply, consumption and water loss is included in the calculation of the Water Audit Data Validity Score *** The Water Audit Data Validity Score is in Tier III (51-70). See Dashboard tab for additional outputs. *** $/100 cubic feet (ccf)
$77,029,110
Total Annual Operating Cost
go to start page
NON-REVENUE WATER:

If entering an
Error Adjustment,
select under- or overregistration

62.630
WATER SUPPLIED:

AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION:

Apparent Losses:

Click 'g' to determine data validity grade Click 'n' to add notes FWAS v6.0 American Water Works Association. Copyright © 2020, All Rights Reserved. To access definitions, click the input name To edit water system info:

AWWA Free Water Audit Software v6.0 Worksheet 1
City of Santa Barbara 2026 Water Shortage Contingency Plan 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | F
Appendix F 2026 Water Shortage
Contingency Plan
F
Public Draft
2025 Water
Shortage
Contingency Plan
MAY 2026 CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
2025 Water Shortage
Contingency Plan
MAY 2026
Public Draft
Prepared by Water Systems Consulting, Inc
City of Santa Barbara Public Draft

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Water Systems Consulting, Inc. would like to acknowledge the significant contributions of the City of Santa Barbara. The primary contributors are listed below.

Dakota Corey, Water Supply & Services Manager
Jasmine Showers, Water Resources Analyst
Dana Hoffenberg, Water Resources Analyst
Madeline Wood, Water Conservation Analyst
The 2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan was prepared by Water Systems Consulting, Inc.

The primary authors are listed below.

Heather Freed, PE
Corinne Watson, EIT
Rob Morrow, PE
City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 Water Service Reliability Analysis.................................................................................... 2

2.1 Supply Characterization............................................................................................... 2

2.2 Supply and Demand Assessment ................................................................................ 3

2.3 2026-2030 Drought Risk Assessment.......................................................................... 4

2.4 Water Supply Reliability Risks ..................................................................................... 5

3.0 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment Procedures .......................................... 7

4.0 Water Shortage Stages ................................................................................................... 9

4.1 Normal Supply Stage..................................................................................................10

4.2 Stage 1 Water Shortage Condition: Water Shortage Watch ........................................10

4.3 Stage 2 Water Shortage Condition: Water Shortage Alert...........................................11

4.4 Stage 3 Water Shortage Condition: Water Shortage Emergency ................................12

4.5 Stage 4 Water Shortage Condition: Catastrophic Water System Emergency ..............13

4.6 Standard Water Level Crosswalk ................................................................................13

5.0 Shortage Response Actions ...........................................................................................14

5.1 Demand Reduction .....................................................................................................14

5.2 Supply Augmentation..................................................................................................19

5.3 Operational Changes ..................................................................................................19

5.4 Emergency Response Plan.........................................................................................20

5.5 Seismic Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plan ............................................................24

5.6 Shortage Response Action Effectiveness ...................................................................25

6.0 Communication Protocols...............................................................................................25

7.0 Compliance and Enforcement ........................................................................................27

8.0 Legal Authority ...............................................................................................................27

9.0 Financial Consequences of WSCP Implementation........................................................27

10.0 Monitoring and Reporting............................................................................................29

11.0 WSCP Refinement Procedures...................................................................................29

12.0 Special Water Feature Distinction...............................................................................30

13.0 Plan Adoption, Submittal, and Availability ...................................................................30 References ...............................................................................................................................32 Attachment 1- Santa Barbara Municipal Code Chapter 14.20 ..................................................... I Attachment 2- Water Shortage Resolution ................................................................................. II City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | ii
Attachment 3- City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex.................................III Attachment 4- Water Rates....................................................................................................... IV Attachment 5- Notifications ........................................................................................................ V Attachment 6- Resolution Approving the WSCP........................................................................ VI City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | iii

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1. 2026-2030 Drought Risk Assessment, Supply and Demand Projections.................. 5 Figure 3-1. City of Santa Barbara Annual Water Assessment Timeline...................................... 8 Figure 4-1. Water Shortage Stages Crosswalk..........................................................................13 City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | iv

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1. Supply and Demand Comparison Summary (AFY) ................................................... 4 Table 2-2. Supply Risks ............................................................................................................. 6 Table 4-1. Water Shortage Contingency Plan Levels ................................................................. 9 Table 5-1. Demand Reduction Actions......................................................................................15 Table 5-2. Supply Augmentation and Other Actions..................................................................19 Table 5-3.Catastrophic Interruption Scenarios ..........................................................................22 Table 5-4. Area Inspection Groups after a Catastrophic Interruption Scenario ..........................23 Table 6-1. Communication Protocol During Water Shortage Conditions ...................................25 City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | v

ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS
WSCP Water Shortage Contingency Plan
AF Acre-feet
AFY Acre-feet per Year
AMI Advanced Metering Infrastructure
CII Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional
CITY City of Santa Barbara
COMB Cachuma Operation and Maintenance Board
CWC California Water Code
DCR Delivery Capability Report
DWR Department of Water Resources
LTWSP Long-Term Water Supply Plan
SBMC Santa Barbara Municipal Code
SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SWP State Water Project
USBR US Bureau of Reclamation
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 1

1.0 Introduction
This Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) is a detailed plan for how the City of Santa Barbara (City) intends to respond to water shortages. The WSCP is used to provide guidance to the City’s Water Commission and City Council, staff, and the public by identifying response actions to allow for efficient and equitable management of water shortages.

Water shortages can be triggered by a hydrologic limitation in supply (i.e., a prolonged period of below-normal precipitation and runoff); limitations or failure of supply, treatment, and/or conveyance infrastructure; or both. Hydrologic or drought limitations tend to develop and abate more slowly, whereas infrastructure failure tends to happen quickly and relatively unpredictably.

Water supplies may be interrupted or reduced significantly in several ways, such as during a drought that limits supplies; a catastrophic event, such as an earthquake, that damages water delivery or storage facilities; a regional power outage; or a toxic spill that affects water quality.

The WSCP describes the following:

1. Water Service Reliability Analysis: Summarizes the City’s water supply analysis and reliability and identifies any key issues that may trigger a shortage condition.

2. Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment Procedures: Describes the key data inputs, evaluation criteria, and methodology for assessing the system’s reliability for the coming year and the steps to formally declare any water shortage stages and response actions.

3. Water Shortage Stages: Establishes water shortage stages to clearly identify and prepare for shortages.

4. Shortage Response Actions: Describes the response actions that may be implemented or considered for each stage to reduce gaps between supply and demand.

5. Communication Protocols: Describes communication protocols under each stage to ensure customers, the public, and government agencies are informed of shortage conditions and requirements.

6. Compliance and Enforcement: Defines compliance and enforcement actions available to administer demand reductions.

7. Legal Authority: Lists the legal documents that grant the City the authority to declare a water shortage and implement and enforce response actions.

8. Financial Consequences of WSCP Implementation: Describes the anticipated financial impact of implementing water shortage stages and identifies mitigation strategies to offset financial burdens.

9. Monitoring and Reporting: Summarizes the monitoring and reporting techniques to evaluate the effectiveness of shortage response actions and overall WSCP City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 2
implementation. Results are used to determine if shortage response actions should be adjusted.

10. WSCP Refinement Procedures: Describes the factors that may trigger updates to the WSCP and outlines how to complete an update.

11. Plan Adoption, Submittal, and Availability: Describes the process for the WSCP adoption, submittal, and availability after each revision.

2.0 Water Service Reliability Analysis
Chapter 7 of the City’s 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) describes the reliability of the City’s water supply by comparing supply and demand projections through 2050 for a normal, single dry, and multiple dry years. The chapter also assesses the drought risk over the next five years (2026–2030) assuming the driest five-year period is repeated over the next five years.

Water supply reliability reflects the City’s ability to meet the water needs of its customers with available water supplies under varying conditions. The analysis considers plausible hydrological and regulatory variability, climate conditions, and other factors that affect the City’s water supply and demand. The following is a concise narrative of the assessment. Refer to the City’s 2025 UWMP for the full assessment.

2.1 Supply Characterization
The diversity of the City’s water supply portfolio is an important factor in assessing the reliability of the water supply under a variety of hydrologic conditions as well as the ability to store multiple years of demand in Lake Cachuma. In normal conditions, the City’s primary water supply is surface water from the Santa Ynez River stored in both Lake Cachuma and Gibraltar Reservoir, including carryover storage from unused Cachuma allocations, and desalination. These supplies are augmented with limited groundwater production (which is typically preserved by the City for droughts and emergencies), State Water Project (SWP) deliveries, and recycled water. These additional supplies typically offset any reduced inflows into Lake Cachuma and Gibraltar Reservoir that would occur in a single year of below-average rainfall conditions.

A single dry year has little effect on availability of Cachuma supplies, because the multiyear reservoir typically has storage available from previous years. However, because Gibraltar is a much smaller reservoir than Cachuma, available supply from Gibraltar Reservoir could potentially be significantly reduced, depending on how dry the year is. In this situation, the City’s annual water supply assessment will determine whether to offset the supply deficiency with added State Water deliveries, increased groundwater pumping, or additional use of Cachuma supplies.

The critical drought period for the City’s water supply occurs when there are multiple consecutive years of below-average rainfall. This is due to the hydrology of the Santa Ynez River, where little or no inflow to Cachuma Reservoir occurs until there is at least a year of City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 3
average rainfall. When the condition of average or less rainfall continues for multiple years in succession, the storage level of Cachuma Reservoir drops and shortages in deliveries occur.

2.2 Supply and Demand Assessment
For the water service reliability analysis, the following supply availability assumptions were applied for the normal, single-dry-year, and multiple-dry-year conditions for each of the City’s supplies:
• Normal Year: Average supply availability during the entire 1942–2019 simulation • Single Dry Year: The year with the lowest water supply available to the City (2016) • Multiple Dry Year: The five-year historical sequence with the lowest precipitation at Lake Cachuma (2012–2016)
As shown in Table 2-1, the City has sufficient supplies to meet demands in a normal year, a single dry year, and multiple dry years, with the need for 20% extraordinary conservation above and beyond the City’s regular water conservation program in the fifth year of a five-year drought.

As shown in the table, in normal years, the City has roughly an excess of 7,000 acre-feet per year (AFY) of available supplies that can be used to prepare for dry periods. For example, unused Cachuma Project water could be stored for use in future years as carryover water. This approach is shown in a single dry year with no Cachuma Project allocations or Gibraltar Reservoir supplies; the City can meet demands through the use of carryover water storage at Lake Cachuma. In multiple dry years, due to limited supplies and assuming no Cachuma carryover water availability in the last two years of a five-year drought, demands are assumed to be reduced by 20% through extraordinary conservation11 measures in the fifth year. During the 2014 - 2019 extended drought, City customers achieved 40% conservation, so the City is confident extraordinary conservation can be achieved during an extended drought, if necessary. 1 Extraordinary conservation is additional conservation measures above and beyond the City’s regular water conservation program that are required to enable the City to meet water demands using available supplies.

City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 4
Table 2-1. Supply and Demand Comparison Summary (AFY)
Year Item1 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Normal
Year
Supply Totals 19,260 19,210 19,160 19,110 19,060
Demand Totals 12,400 12,480 12,540 12,560 12,600
Difference 6,860 6,730 6,620 6,560 6,470
Single Dry
Year
Supply Totals 12,420 12,420 12,420 12,420 12,420
Demand Totals2 12,400 11,980 12,030 12,050 12,090
Difference 20 440 390 370 330
Multiple Dry Years
First Year
(2012)
Supply Totals 23,460 23,460 23,460 23,460 23,460
Demand Totals 12,400 12,480 12,540 12,560 12,600
Difference 11,060 10,980 10,920 10,900 10,860
Second
Year
(2013)
Supply Totals 22,450 22,370 22,310 22,290 22,250
Demand Totals 12,400 12,480 12,540 12,560 12,600
Difference 10,050 9,890 9,770 9,740 9,650
Third Year
(2014)
Supply Totals 19,440 19,270 19,160 19,120 19,040
Demand Totals 12,400 12,480 12,540 12,560 12,600
Difference 7,040 6,790 6,620 6,570 6,440
Fourth
Year
(2015)
Supply Totals 15,700 15,700 15,700 15,700 15,700
Demand Totals 12,400 12,480 12,540 12,560 12,600
Difference 3,310 3,220 3,170 3,150 3,100
Fifth Year
(2016)
Supply Totals 11,010 11,010 11,010 11,010 11,010
Demand Totals3 10,410 10,480 10,520 10,540 10,570
Difference 600 540 490 480 440

1. Refer to supply assumptions in Section 7.1 of the 2025 UWMP. Values are rounded to the nearest 10.

2. Extraordinary conservation measures, which are above and beyond the City’s adopted conservation program, are assumed to be implemented to reduce demand by 5% beginning in 2035 during a single dry year.

3. Extraordinary conservation measures, which are above and beyond the City’s adopted conservation program, are assumed to be implemented to reduce demand by 20% in Year 5.

2.3 2026-2030 Drought Risk Assessment
The Drought Risk Assessment for the upcoming five years (2026–2030) is based on current conditions and the five driest years on record (2012–2016). Based on the projected demands and available supplies, Figure 2-1 presents the projected supplies used to meet demands and City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 5
the remaining available supply each year. While the City currently has no Cachuma carryover following the reservoir spilling in early 2026, it is anticipated that the City could build some carryover in the next few years that would be used starting in 2029 as Cachuma allocations decrease. With the current available supplies, the City is expected to have sufficient supplies to meet demand through a five-year drought.

Note that these projections contrast with the need to implement extraordinary conservation measures during the 2014-2019 drought due to the addition of desalination, which adds a baseloaded annual supply and allows the City to accumulate carryover storage in Cachuma.

Figure 2-1. 2026-2030 Drought Risk Assessment, Supply and Demand Projections Note: Supply projections assume drought conditions extend through 2030. Refer to the City’s 2025 UWMP Chapter 7 for supply and demand assumptions.

2.4 Water Supply Reliability Risks
A range of issues could lead to supply shortages. However, extended drought conditions are the most likely threat. The City’s 2021 Long-Term Water Supply Plan (LTWSP) analyzed the most impactful risks associated with the City’s supply projections, shown in Table 2-2 (WSC, 2021).

The topics listed in the table were analyzed by comparing supply and demand with risk-adjusted supplies to understand reliability under potential future conditions. Also, resilience scenarios, such as temporary loss of one or more supplies from an earthquake, were analyzed. The result City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 6
of the analysis was a series of recommendations and an Adaptive Management Plan for the City to implement when supply or demand conditions change in the future.

Table 2-2. Supply Risks
Risk Description
Climate
Variability
More extreme droughts, increased irrigation demand, reduced yield, more intense rainfall/flooding, and higher variability from surface water supplies Lake
Cachuma
Increased
Releases
An update to the 2000 Biological Opinion may lead to a reduction in Lake Cachuma supplies and the City’s annual yield.

Gibraltar
Reservoir
High
Sedimentation
Increased rate of sedimentation due to wildfires reduces the Gibraltar Reservoir storage volume and annual yield. Obtaining a Warren Act contract with US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) per the Pass-Through Agreement would shift lost Gibraltar Reservoir storage capacity to Lake Cachuma.

Megadrought1 A prolonged drought lasting two decades or longer Surface Water
Quality
Degradation
Surface water quality degradation due to wildfires and warmer temperatures impact Lake Cachuma and Gibraltar Reservoir, making them susceptible to algae blooms, which negatively impact water quality.

Ocean Water
Quality
Degradation
Ocean water quality degradation scenarios from algae blooms, debris flows, oil spills, and sewage spills would temporarily prevent intake of seawater for desalination.

Desalination
Regulations
Permanent loss or reduction of desalination supply due to changes in laws or regulatory policy would return the City to supply conditions prior to the desalination plant activation in 2017.

SWP Yield
SWP annual allocations are highly variable, and average yield projections have declined with each successive Delivery Capability Report (DCR) from the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). The City does not benefit from average and wet year supplies due to lack of storage beyond limited carryover water in San Luis Reservoir. Delta Conveyance Project construction would further reduce the reliability of SWP water since San Luis Reservoir will spill more frequently and the City loses its carryover water after spill events.
1Per Williams et al. “Global warming has pushed what would have been a moderate drought in southwestern North America into megadrought territory.” Williams et al. used a combination of hydrological modeling and tree-ring reconstructions of summer soil moisture to show that the period from 2000 to 2018 was the driest 19-year span since the late 1500s and the second driest since 800 CE. “This appears to be just the beginning of a more extreme trend toward megadrought as global warming continues.” (Williams, 2020) City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 7

3.0 Annual Water Supply and Demand
Assessment Procedures
As established by California Water Code (CWC) Section 10632.1, urban water suppliers must conduct annual water supply and demand assessments and submit an annual water shortage assessment report to DWR with information on anticipated shortages, triggered shortage response actions, and compliance and enforcement actions consistent with the WSCP.

Beginning in 2022, the City prepares and submits an Annual Water Shortage Assessment Report to DWR. The Annual Water Shortage Assessment Report is due by July 1 of every year.

Per CWC, the annual assessment must include:
• The written decision-making process that the City will use each year to determine its water supply reliability
• The key data inputs and assessment methodology used to evaluate the supplier’s water supply reliability for the current year and one dry year, including:
 Current-year unconstrained demand
 Available supply in the current year and one dry year  Existing infrastructure capabilities and plausible constraints  A defined set of locally applicable evaluation criteria that are consistently relied on for each annual water supply and demand assessment
 A description and quantification of each source of water supply The City has an existing annual assessment process in place that goes beyond the CWC annual assessment requirements. The City’s process comprises an Annual Water Supply Management Report and Annual Water Supply Outlook, which are separate activities that are often presented to the City’s Water Commission and City Council in conjunction with each other.

The City’s Annual Water Supply Management Report is a backward-looking analysis that summarizes water supplies and issues for the previous water year, which extends from October 1 to September 30. The report summarizes the following information:
• The status of water supplies at the end of the water year (September 30) • Drought outlook
• Water conservation and demand
• Major capital projects that improve the City’s ability to provide safe and reliable water • Significant issues that affect the security and reliability of the City’s water supplies The Annual Water Supply Outlook provides an overview of the City’s water supplies at the beginning of each water year and includes an analysis of whether the City’s available water supplies are sufficient to meet demands over the next three years. The analysis takes a conservative approach, assuming the next three years will be drought years. This conservative planning approach allows staff to evaluate if the City has sufficient water to meet demands City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 8
under three additional years of drought and, if not, what level of shortage is anticipated.

Assumptions used to compile the Annual Water Supply Outlook include:
• Next three water years are dry — no new inflows to Cachuma or Gibraltar • Current Cachuma storage and projected storage for the next three years (source: Cachuma Operation and Maintenance Board [COMB])
 Reduced Cachuma allocations based on projected Cachuma storage • 35% SWP allocation
• Assumes drought-impacted Mission Tunnel intrusion (75 AF/month) • Current supply availability
o Cachuma carryover plus Cachuma allocation (source: monthly COMB reports) o Gibraltar storage (source: monthly Upper Santa Ynez River Operations Agreement Reports [City])
o Groundwater storage and pumping capacity (source: USGS water-level data and City well-pumping-capacity data)
o SWP carryover and SWP allocation (source: Central Coast Water Authority Water Delivery Status Report)
o Desal production capacity (source: City data)
• Demands as projected in the UWMP or as adjusted to meet real-time demands Figure 3-1 presents a typical annual timeline for preparation and submittal of the Annual Water Supply Management Report and Annual Water Supply Outlook in relation to the water year. If the City is actively engaged in drought response, water supply updates are provided to the Water Commission monthly and the Council as frequently as monthly, as needed. The Water Commission can recommend, and the Council can adopt, new ordinances to change the City’s water shortage condition, as described in Section 7.

Figure 3-1. City of Santa Barbara Annual Water Assessment Timeline City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 9

4.0 Water Shortage Stages
The City’s water shortage planning addresses supply shortages ranging from a slowly developing drought to sudden and potentially catastrophic interruptions, such as earthquakes and/or failure of major system components. Consistent with past plans and experience with severe droughts, including the most recent record drought, this plan uses four stages to structure the City’s response to water shortages. It reflects the City’s experience that each shortage situation is different and that flexibility is needed to respond to developing water conditions. This is especially important with the increasing diversity of the City’s water supply portfolio and the need to comply with State mandates regarding water reduction targets and water use regulations.

The City’s water shortage stages and corresponding demand reductions and a description of the corresponding water supply conditions are included in Table 4-1 and described further in separate sections. The potential reduction measures for each stage are described in Section

5.0. Table 4-1. Water Shortage Contingency Plan Levels
Stage
Percent
Supply
Reduction
Category Water Supply Condition
Normal
Supply 0%
Full Cachuma entitlement is projected for the coming
water year, and there are no extraordinary shortages
in other City supplies.
1 0%–15%
Water
Shortage
Watch
A Cachuma entitlement reduction is projected for the
coming water year, assuming continued dry weather,
or an extraordinary reduction in other City supplies
has been identified.
2 15%–25%
Water
Shortage
Alert
Continuing conditions of average or less rainfall have
resulted in continued decline in Cachuma storage
following a reduction in entitlement, or an
extraordinary reduction in other City supplies has
been identified.
3 25%–50%
Water
Shortage
Emergency
Cachuma supplies are projected to be exhausted
during the coming water year, or a catastrophic
interruption to City water supplies has occurred.
4 >50%
Catastrophic
Water System
Emergency
Catastrophic interruption to City water supplies has
occurred.

City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 10

4.1 Normal Supply Stage
Supplies are considered normal when a 100% Cachuma allocation is projected for the coming water year and there are no extraordinary shortages in other City supplies. While in the normal supply condition stage, the City will:
• Continue efforts to preserve water supply sources, such as management of watersheds to minimize siltation, banking of water as feasible to firm up deliveries through the SWP, in-lieu recharge of groundwater in years when adequate surface water supplies are available to meet demand (even as demand may be reduced through conservation measures), and development of optimal groundwater pumping capacity to ensure reliable extraction of groundwater when needed
• Continue implementation of the City’s conservation program with the goal of encouraging water conservation as a way of life, including high-efficiency plumbing retrofits, low-waterusing landscaping, efficient irrigation practices, public information regarding water awareness, and tiered rate pricing
• Extend and expand the use of recycled water where feasible and cost effective • Monitor water demands in terms of actual versus projected consumption and cumulative commitments to serve
• Limit water use restrictions to prohibiting water waste

4.2 Stage 1 Water Shortage Condition: Water
Shortage Watch
A Stage 1 Water Shortage Condition is defined as a short-term water shortage condition declared by Resolution of the City Council upon being advised that a Cachuma entitlement reduction is projected for the coming water year, assuming continued dry weather. A Stage 1 Water Shortage Condition is also defined as the identification of an extraordinary reduction in other City supplies. During a Stage 1 Water Shortage Condition, the City will take the following actions:
• Staff prepares a report to the Water Commission and City Council addressing:
 Status of surface water supplies
 Status of the City’s groundwater resources and pumping capability  Status of the City’s desalination facility and any related cost and permitting issues  Projected deliveries of SWP entitlement
 Anticipated availability of banked water and one-time purchase of water via short-term transfers
 Possible reduction in Cachuma deliveries to City in excess of reductions agreed to by member units to allow build-up of City carryover at Cachuma  A range of water supply scenarios based on various levels of assumed rainfall City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 11
• Water Commission and City Council consider staff recommendation regarding adoption of a resolution declaring a Stage 1 Water Shortage Condition • Public advised of the City’s water supply situation; the need for voluntary reductions in water use is expected to range from 0% to 15% at this stage
• Water use restrictions limited to prohibiting water waste

4.3 Stage 2 Water Shortage Condition: Water
Shortage Alert
A Stage 2 Water Shortage Condition is defined as a short-term water shortage condition declared by Resolution of Council upon being advised that continuing conditions of average or less rainfall have resulted in continued decline in Cachuma storage following a reduction in entitlement. A Stage 2 Water Shortage Condition is also defined as the identification of an extraordinary reduction in other City supplies. During a Stage 2 Water Shortage Condition, the City will take the following actions:
• Staff prepares a report to the Water Commission and City Council addressing:
 Updated water supply scenarios based on various levels of assumed rainfall or other applicable metrics
 Need for:
➢ Demand reduction by the public
➢ Water use restrictions
➢ Design and permitting work associated with temporary water supply augmentations • Revenue projections and changes in water rates
• City Council considers staff and Water Commission recommendation regarding adoption of a resolution declaring a Stage 2 Water Shortage Condition • Public advised of need for mandatory water conservation savings in the range of 15%–25% • City determines the need for water use restrictions pursuant to Santa Barbara Municipal Code (SBMC) Section 14.20.215 (Attachment 1) and incorporates appropriate exemptions into the water shortage resolution
• Public information effort is aimed at advising the public regarding:
 The City’s water supply situation
 Efforts being made by the City to minimize impacts of the water shortage  The public’s role in achieving demand reductions
 Enforcement of water use restrictions, pursuant to Council direction  Review of revenue projections and implementation of rate changes, if necessary, pursuant to Council direction
City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 12

4.4 Stage 3 Water Shortage Condition: Water
Shortage Emergency
A Stage 3 Water Shortage Condition is defined as a short-term water shortage condition declared by Resolution of Council upon being advised that Cachuma supplies are projected to be exhausted during the coming water year. A Stage 3 Water Shortage Condition is also defined as the imminence or occurrence of a catastrophic interruption to City water supplies.

During a Stage 3 Water Shortage Condition, the City will take the following actions:
• Staff prepare a report to the Water Commission and City Council addressing:
 Updated water supply scenarios based on various levels of assumed rainfall or other applicable metrics
 Need for:
➢ Further demand reduction by the public
➢ Increased water use restrictions, including potential prohibition on uses other than drinking water and sanitation
➢ Accelerated design, permitting, and construction work associated with temporary water supply augmentations
 Evaluation of potential increased supply from desalination facility and from purchases of supplemental water
• City Council considers staff and Water Commission recommendations regarding adoption of a resolution declaring a Stage 3 Water Shortage Condition pursuant to CWC, Chapter 3 • Public advised of need for mandatory water conservation savings in the range of 25%–50% • Revised demand reduction target announced to public, accompanied by information about how to achieve required reductions and efforts being made by the City to resolve the water shortage condition
• Water use restrictions adjusted as necessary pursuant to SBMC Section 14.20.215.B (Attachment 1)
• Evaluate revenues and the need for rate changes; staff implement changes pursuant to Council direction
• Suspension of development project approvals considered • Water use restrictions enforced by staff pursuant to Council direction • Success in meeting reduction targets measured by tracking monthly production of water into the distribution system and by targeted water use analysis of specific water use sectors While the City’s long-term supply planning is based on a maximum planned shortage of 15%, unforeseen circumstances can result in the need to respond to shortages of up to 50%. The City’s customers achieved 40% conservation during the 2014-2019 drought, and the City still had water shortage response measures that could achieve short-term demand reductions up to 50%, carefully tailored to the situation at hand. Flexible application of water use regulations, development restrictions, allocations, and public information will be used to meet the required demand reduction target.

City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 13

4.5 Stage 4 Water Shortage Condition: Catastrophic
Water System Emergency
A Stage 4 Water Shortage Condition is defined as a short-term water service emergency declared by the City Council following a catastrophic event that substantially reduces the City’s ability to provide potable water to its customers. The condition may be activated following a major earthquake or other natural disaster that could restrict the City’s water service abilities.

During a Stage 4 Water Shortage Condition, the City would implement its Emergency Response Plan, which is described in Section 5.4.

4.6 Standard Water Level Crosswalk
CWC Section 10632(a)(3)(A) includes six standard water shortage levels, corresponding to progressive ranges of up to 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% shortages and greater than a 50% shortage. If the supplier’s water shortage levels do not correspond with the six standard levels, then a crosswalk between the supplier’s stages and the standard levels is required for compliance. The crosswalk between the City’s four stages and the standard water shortage levels is shown in Figure 4-1.

Figure 4-1. Water Shortage Stages Crosswalk
City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 14

5.0 Shortage Response Actions
This WSCP identifies various actions to be considered by the City Council during the various water shortage stages, including public information, water conservation assistance, supply augmentation, water use regulations, development approvals, and demand tracking. In the event of a water shortage emergency, the City will evaluate the cause of the emergency to help inform which response actions should be implemented. Depending on the nature of the water shortage, the City can elect to implement one or several response actions to mitigate the shortage and reduce gaps between supply and demand. It should be noted that all actions listed for Stage 1 apply to Stages 2, 3, and 4. Likewise, Stage 2 actions apply to Stages 3 and 4, and Stage 3 actions apply to Stage 4. If necessary, the City may adopt additional actions not listed here in extreme circumstances. SBMC Chapter 14.20 (Attachment 1) provides standing authorization for water use restrictions and prohibitions to become effective upon adoption of a Water Shortage Resolution at any regular meeting of the City Council. An example water shortage resolution is included in Attachment 2.

5.1 Demand Reduction
Whether during normal supply or water shortage conditions, the City implements a comprehensive water conservation program pursuant to the Water Conservation Strategic Plan.

Public information, development standards, workshops, rebates, and tiered rates are ongoing during normal supply conditions and adjusted to target needed reductions during water shortage conditions. Table 5-1 identifies demand reduction methods that are considered during water shortage conditions. These methods were effective in providing substantial reductions in demand during the drought of the late 1980s and the recent record drought that commenced in 2014.

City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 15
Table 5-1. Demand Reduction Actions
Shortage
Level
Demand Reduction
Actions
How much is this
going to reduce
the shortage
gap?1
Additional Explanation or Reference
Penalty,
Charge, or
Other
Enforcement
All Expand Public
Information Campaign 0%–5%
Community outreach includes increased
advertising, presentations to community groups,
workshops, and enhanced website resources.

No
All Offer Water Use Surveys 0%–1% Water checkups are available to all customer classes. No
All
Provide Rebates on
Plumbing Fixtures and
Devices
0%–1%
Offer or expand rebates on a variety of plumbing
fixtures that are high efficiency such as washers,
toilets, and urinals.

No
All
Provide Rebates for
Landscape Irrigation
Efficiency
0%–1%
Offer or expand rebates for drip irrigation
conversions, smart irrigation controllers, water wise
plants, and rain sensors to improve efficiency.

No
All Provide Rebates for
Turfgrass Replacement 0%–1%
Offer or expand rebates for community members
who wish to replace their turfgrass with a water wise
garden.

No
All
Decrease Line Flushing
or Pursue Zero
Discharge Flushing
Methods
0%–1% The City uses zero-discharge water recycling trucks for water system flushing.

No
All Other — Leaky device 0%–1%
Customers are required to repair any leaking or
malfunctioning devices within 72 hours of
notification of leak.

Yes
All Landscape — Runoff 0%–1% Landscape irrigation in excess leading to runoff onto nearby surfaces is prohibited. Yes
City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 16
Shortage
Level
Demand Reduction
Actions
How much is this
going to reduce
the shortage
gap?1
Additional Explanation or Reference
Penalty,
Charge, or
Other
Enforcement
All Other — Post-rainfall
prohibition 0%–1% Prohibit irrigation with potable water during and within 48 hours after measurable rainfall. Yes 1 Reduce System Water
Loss 0%–1%
The City increases efforts to correct water system
losses, including repairing leaks and eliminating
illicit connections.

No
2 Increase Water Waste
Patrols 0%–1% Patrols discourage water wasting and correct water wasting practices in the community. Yes 2 Other — Nozzles 0%–1% Only hoses with automatic shutoff nozzle fixtures are permitted. Yes
2 Other — Prohibit vehicle
washing 0%–1%
Prohibit washing cars, boats, trailers, aircraft, or
other vehicles except with hose shutoff nozzle or at
commercial or fleet vehicle washing facilities using
water recycling equipment.

Yes
2 Landscape — Limit
landscape irrigation to
specific times
0%–5% Prohibit irrigation during the hours when
evaporation is highest. Yes
2 CII — Lodging linen
service 0%–1% Hotels/motels must provide guests with option to reuse towels and linens for more than one day. Yes 2 CII — Restaurants serve
water upon request 0%–1%
No restaurant, hotel, café, cafeteria, or other public
place where food is served shall serve drinking
water to any customer unless expressly requested.

Yes
2 Other 0%–1%
Require posting of water shortage notice at
restaurants, hotels/motels, and commercial
showering and car washing facilities.

Yes
City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 17
Shortage
Level
Demand Reduction
Actions
How much is this
going to reduce
the shortage
gap?1
Additional Explanation or Reference
Penalty,
Charge, or
Other
Enforcement
2 Pools and Spas —
Require covers for pools
and spas
0%–1% Require covers for swimming pools and spas when
not in use. Yes
3 Other — Prohibit use of
potable water for
washing hard surfaces
0%–1%
Prohibit use of potable water to wash sidewalks,
walkways, driveways, parking lots, open ground, or
other hard-surfaced areas except where necessary
for public health or safety.

Yes
3 Landscape — Limit
landscape irrigation to
specific days
5%–10% Limit to assigned watering days, which may depend on seasonal changes, such as summer and winter. Yes
3 Water Features —
Restrict water use for
decorative water features
0%–1%
Prohibit use of potable water to fill or maintain
decorative fountains and water features unless
located indoors or are home to aquatic life.

Yes
3 Other water feature or
swimming pool restriction 0%–1% Restrict draining and refilling of pools by more than one-third of the pool volume. Yes 3 Other 0%–1% Limit the use of potable water hydrant meters. Yes 4 Landscape — Other
landscape restriction or
prohibition
5%–10% Restrict irrigation to high-efficiency methods. Yes 4 Landscape — Other
landscape restriction or
prohibition
5%–20% Restrict irrigation to watering by hand only. Yes 4 Landscape — Other
landscape restriction or
prohibition
5%–20% Prohibit/restrict irrigation of turfgrass. Yes
4 Other 20%–40% Prohibit all outdoor water use. Yes
City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 18
Shortage
Level
Demand Reduction
Actions
How much is this
going to reduce
the shortage
gap?1
Additional Explanation or Reference
Penalty,
Charge, or
Other
Enforcement
4 Other 20%–70% Institute water rationing. Yes
4 Moratorium or Net Zero
New Demand 0%–1% The City may temporarily limit or ban new water service connections within the service area. No

1. Reduction in the shortage gap is estimated and can vary significantly.

City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 19

5.2 Supply Augmentation
The SWP conveyance infrastructure provides the City with the ability to convey supplemental water purchases to augment drought-year supplies. During the 2012-2016 drought, the City purchased supplemental water through Central Coast Water Authority. Refer to the 2025 UWMP Section 6.3.2 for more information on supplemental water purchases. Supply augmentation actions are described in Table 5-2. These augmentations represent short-term management objectives triggered during a water shortage and do not overlap with long-term new water supply development or supply reliability enhancement projects.

Table 5-2. Supply Augmentation and Other Actions
Shortage
Level
Supply Augmentation
Action and Other
Actions by Water
Supplier
How much is
this going to
reduce the
shortage
gap?
Additional Explanation or Reference
All Groundwater Varying
Groundwater is pumped from drought
storage volume. The amount is
dependent on diminished quantity from
City’s supply portfolio.

All Water Purchases Varying
The amount of water purchased is
dependent on diminished quantity from
City’s supply portfolio.

5.3 Operational Changes
To address water shortages on a short- and long-term basis, operational changes within the City occur to ensure an efficient and meaningful response. During a time of water shortage, the City will convene a series of task forces, including:
• Executive Drought Team: composed of the City Administrator, City department heads, the Water Resources Director and the Water Supply and Services Manager. This team discusses plans and strategies for responding to the persistent drought conditions. • Intra-City Drought Team: composed of representatives from Parks and Recreation Department, Airport Department, Fire Department, Fleet Services Division, Facilities Division, Planning Division, Building and Safety Division, Waterfront Department, Office of Emergency Services, Streets Division, and Water Resources Department. This team identifies immediate and long-term water-saving actions that can be implemented throughout the City organization and facilities, with support from Water Resources staff. • Water Resources Operational Drought Team: composed of management and operational staff from water treatment, water distribution, wastewater treatment, wastewater collections, and water supply management work groups. This team identifies operational opportunities City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 20
to conserve water as well as practices to implement at water treatment facilities and/or throughout the water and wastewater system.
• Core Drought Team: composed of water supply management staff to assess changing water supply shortage conditions and implement the WSCP.

These teams work to facilitate internal City coordination. For example, during the 2014-2019 drought, the Parks and Recreation Department instituted a successful 2014 Strategic Drought Response Plan (City of Santa Barbara Parks and Recreation Department, 2014) that detailed department actions to prioritize potable water use for certain facilities and sensitive/historic resources. The majority of the City’s parks are irrigated with recycled water, and increased messaging about the benefits and use of recycled water was also implemented. Similar measures may be considered in the future. Other internal operational changes that may be implemented by the City include:
• Display messaging highlighting water-saving actions in City facilities, including communal staff areas and public areas such as restrooms, kitchens, and break rooms • Limit vehicle washing, in coordination with Fleet Services Division • Evaluate frequency of items laundered by laundering contractor • Equip field staff with public information material about the drought and water use regulations and educate staff on how to report water waste to enforcement staff • Reduce reservoir cleaning
• Use secondary wastewater effluent as process water for wastewater treatment • Reuse plant processing water at water treatment plant • Evaluate suspending capital improvement projects that are water intensive and cannot use the water recycler vehicles
• Require the use of recycled water for dust control for all applicable City projects During the 2014-2019 drought, the City researched, piloted, and invested in two new technologies to reduce the amount of water used in operational practices. The water distribution team purchased a vehicle that flushes water mains by filtering and recycling potable water in the system between two fire hydrants, rather than discharging the water into a nearby storm drain.

The wastewater collection team purchased a vehicle that initially fills with recycled water and proceeds to clean the wastewater mains by continuing to recycle the water in the system, rather than using additional recycled or potable water. Use of these vehicles has now become standard practice for the City, and they will continue to be used during normal supply conditions, as well as during a water shortage condition.

5.4 Emergency Response Plan
Besides drought, the City water supply may experience a catastrophic interruption as a result of natural disasters such as an earthquake, a tsunami, a wildfire, a mudslide, a regional power outage, or terrorism. Emergency administrative procedures are detailed and periodically updated in the City’s Emergency Operations Center Manual.

City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 21
Planning and response measures in the event of an interruption to the City’s water supply include the following:
• A diverse portfolio of supplies provides redundancy that increases the likelihood of being able to meet emergency needs even under catastrophic conditions. • In advance of a known threat to the City’s water system, such as a wildfire, distribution reservoirs will be filled to full capacity, and any reservoir out of service will be put back into service.
• Primary water supply sources and the main treatment plant will supply water to the City via gravity to reduce normal operating costs and minimize disruption during disasters. • A groundwater production system has been developed and maintained to augment supplies to the distribution system or provide direct emergency drinking water supplies should the distribution system be put out of service. In the event of a prolonged power outage, power can be provided by portable generators to more than half of the City’s major production wells.
• Backup power supplies with automatic transfer switching and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) capability have been installed at the primary water treatment plant and critical distribution pump stations.
• Portable generators will be deployed to critical facilities lacking emergency backup power. • SCADA is used throughout the distribution system to monitor system problems, whether minor day-to-day problems or major disruptions.
• An ongoing program of water main replacement targets sections of the distribution system with the highest likelihood of breaks.
• Upgraded security, including more secure fencing, video monitoring, and alarms, is being installed at select water supply facilities.
• Public access to water supply facilities has been limited for security reasons. • City distribution system crews are trained in pipe repair and replacement as a part of their normal duties and are continually ready to perform such work in emergencies. • All City employees are designated as emergency service workers and would be activated to perform damage assessment and repairs and to fill gaps left by staff who live out of town and may be unable to get to Santa Barbara during a disaster. • The City’s emergency response program includes emergency communication procedures that would be used for notifying the public about emergency water use restrictions, potential need to boil tap water before drinking, and locations where drinking water is available in the event of widespread distribution system failure.

Given the diversity of the City’s water supply, there is a range of catastrophic supply interruption scenarios that may occur. At the extreme end of the range, a catastrophic seismic event could include failure of both Gibraltar Dam and Bradbury Dam (Lake Cachuma), also impacting State Water deliveries, or failure of Tecolote and/or Mission Tunnels, which convey surface water supplies from Lake Cachuma and Gibraltar Reservoir, respectively, to the City’s treatment plant.

Damage to groundwater wells would also be expected. Table 5-3 summarizes some foreseeable interruptions of higher probability but lesser magnitude. In an actual event, detailed City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 22
analysis would be conducted to assess the extent and duration of interruption and the alternatives for short-term replacement of lost supplies.

Table 5-3.Catastrophic Interruption Scenarios
Damage limited to distribution system: Main breaks in various parts of the City Anticipated Duration: Ranging from days to months, depending on extent of damage Responses:
• Valve off damaged sections.
• Inventory customers without service and provide access to emergency drinking water as necessary.
• Prioritize repair efforts based on health, safety, and sanitation.

Collapse of Mission Tunnel: Supplies from Gibraltar Reservoir and Mission Tunnel infiltration interrupted
Anticipated Duration: Ranging from months to a year or more Responses:
• Assess extent of remaining tunnel flow.
• Restrict irrigation uses.
• Impose water usage restrictions and notify public to reduce water use to targeted level based on actual circumstances.
• Consider increases in SWP delivery requests.
• Initiate emergency design and construction process for tunnel repair.

Collapse of Tecolote Tunnel: Supplies from Lake Cachuma, tunnel infiltration, and SWP interrupted
Anticipated Duration: Ranging from months to a year or more Responses:
• Assess extent of remaining tunnel flow.
• Curtail most or all irrigation uses.
• Impose water usage restrictions and notify public to reduce water use to targeted level based on actual circumstances.
• Consider extent to which supplies are available to assist neighboring agencies affected by loss of Cachuma deliveries.
• Participate with COMB and USBR in emergency design and construction process for repair of tunnel.

Regional Power Outage
Anticipated Duration: Ranging from hours to weeks
Responses:
• Initiate contact with City Emergency Operations Center. • Activate and monitor backup generators at Cater Treatment Plant and key distribution pumping stations.
• Assess supplies of generator fuel and develop a schedule of prioritized fuel needs.
• Identify optimal sites for deployment of portable generators (wells, pump stations, treatment system).
• Prepare to issue a consumer alert about potential for: 1) low system pressure, 2) need to curtail water use, and 3) need to boil water before drinking. • Evaluate the need for water quality sampling.
• Consider increasing disinfectant residual as a precaution against potential system contamination.
• Isolate any segments of known contamination; issue notice not to drink water in the affected areas.

City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 23
In the occurrence of a catastrophic event, City employees are prepared to mobilize to respond to emergent issues, including taking the following actions:
• Assemble supervisors at Public Works Yard, 630 Garden Street. • Determine which staff are present and which need to be contacted. • Contact absent staff and direct them to report once families are safe. • Check status of all equipment, refuel, and restock supplies on vehicles. • Mobilize Water Resources Laboratory staff at City lab and prepare for anticipated water quality test requests.
• Contact local contractors to be at the ready to provide support.

Dispatch crews will be sent to inspect, patrol, and report on condition of facilities and distribution piping in designated areas of the system based on Table 5-4.

The City also maintains a Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) available online (https://santabarbaraca.gov/wastewatercollection) that includes a Sewer System Overflow Emergency Response Plan (Appendix G1 of the SSMP) and Lift Station Emergency Response Plan (Appendix G2 of the SSMP).

Table 5-4. Area Inspection Groups after a Catastrophic Interruption Scenario Group A - Water Facilities Group B - Water Facilities
Vic Trace Reservoir & La Coronilla Pump
Station Reservoir No. 1
La Mesa Reservoir East Reservoir & Bothin Pump Station
Escondido Pump Station El Cielito Reservoir & Skofield Pump Station
Calle Las Caleras Pump Station Skofield Reservoir
Hope Reservoir & Campanil Hill Pump Station La Vista Reservoir Group C – Water Facilities Group D - Wastewater Lift Stations Reservoir No. 2
Braemar
Linda Road
El Camino De la Luz
Sheffield Reservoirs & El Cielito Pump Station
South Portal of Mission Tunnel (Cater Staff to
inspect)
Rocky Nook Pump Station
Sheffield Pump Station
Tunnel Road Reservoir & Pump Station
Cater Cross-Tie Pump Station (Cater Staff to
inspect)
Group E - Wastewater Lift Stations
Skofield
La Colina
Via Lucero
Tallant Road
City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 24
Additional actions to be implemented during a catastrophic event include:
• Assign qualified staff to monitor the SCADA telemetry system, to the extent it is still functional, to determine the extent of system damage and the most critical points on the distribution system.
• Conduct a complete inspection of the Cater Water Treatment Plant, Ortega Groundwater Treatment Plant, and Desalination Plant to determine status and extent of damage. • Contact Cachuma Project operators (USBR and COMB) to determine condition of Bradbury Dam, Tecolote Tunnel, and related facilities.
• Contact the City’s dam caretaker at Gibraltar Reservoir to determine condition of Gibraltar Dam and related facilities.
• Contact the City’s Water Treatment Superintendent to determine if Mission Tunnel has experienced a disruption of water conveyance.
• Assess condition of City groundwater wells by measuring water levels and well depths and taking water samples for analysis of water quality.
• Assign qualified staff to use the City’s hydraulic computer model to simulate identified field deficiencies and run scenarios to identify the most efficient repair, isolation, or reconstruction recommendations.
• Prioritize distribution system repairs to best meet critical needs, including water for firefighting and health and safety needs; identify a portion of available potable supply to be reserved for drinking water purposes in the event of prolonged interruption. • Develop materials list for treatment plant and distribution system repairs, and contact California Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network for mutual aid support. • Allocate available portable generators and pumps according to highest need for groundwater wells, sanitation, firefighting, or powering emergency facilities. • Develop a clear message for information dissemination to the public that includes:
 Nature of the catastrophic event
 Status of distribution system
 Water use prohibitions
 Allowable water uses
 Potential need to boil drinking water before consumption  Location and availability of emergency drinking water, in the event of distribution system failure
For more information on actions during an emergency, refer to the 2020 City of Santa Barbara Water System Risk and Resilience Assessment Report (Brown and Caldwell, 2020) and the City of Santa Barbara Emergency Response Plan (City of Santa Barbara Office of Emergency Services, 2021).

5.5 Seismic Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plan
Refer to the 2023 Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan with City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex (Attachment 3) for general seismic risk City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 25
assessment and the 2020 City of Santa Barbara Water System Risk and Resilience Assessment Report (Brown and Caldwell, 2020) for seismic risk assessment specifically related to the City’s water system. The City of Santa Barbara Emergency Response Plan (City of Santa Barbara Office of Emergency Services, 2021) details processes for mitigation. Refer to the previous Section 5.4 for an overview of the City’s post-catastrophic-event mitigation process.

5.6 Shortage Response Action Effectiveness
Measuring reductions in water use is part of regular procedures, whether during normal or water shortage conditions. Water is produced and introduced into the distribution system in response to customer demand and is tracked monthly as an indicator of overall demand. For demand analysis by customer class, geographic area, and usage level, the City’s billing system provides standardized reports on monthly metered sales by bill code, as well as customized reports for specific areas of analysis. The City can also utilize advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) data to track water use on a more regular basis (hourly, daily) or granular level (by customer type).

During water shortage conditions, savings are measured in comparison to what is considered to be a normal-year demand (i.e., current customer base with approximately average rainfall) or in reference to a specific base year as may be dictated by statewide requirements.

6.0 Communication Protocols
This WSCP includes a staged plan to communicate the declaration of a shortage stage and provide updates during a water shortage emergency. A summary of actions the City could potentially take during a specific shortage stage is outlined in Table 6-1. As water supply conditions worsen, but before a water shortage is declared, the City increases public outreach on the current water supply conditions, the plans for water shortage response, and the importance of water efficiency to stretch current supplies.

Table 6-1. Communication Protocol During Water Shortage Conditions Shortage
Level City Action
1 Information posted on the City’s website and regional water efficiency website, WaterWiseSB.org
1 Press releases to local media (online and print newspapers, TV, radio, etc.) 1 Increased messaging with the utility bill (message printed on front and back of bill, flyer insert with bill, message printed on front and back of envelope) 1 Articles in the weekly City e-newsletter
1 Articles in the quarterly water e-newsletter
1 Social media posts (Facebook, X, and Nextdoor)
City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 26
Shortage
Level
City Action
2-3
“Weekly Water Conservation Message” emailed weekly to partner organizations to share in their own messaging/newsletters, posted on City social media, sent in City weekly e-newsletter
2-3
Increased paid advertising — print, online, radio, TV, streaming, social media, movie theaters, buses, etc.
2-3
Signage in all City public facilities to reduce water usage, such as kitchens and bathrooms
2-3
Signage on City fountains that are turned off, City turfgrass that is deficit watered or stressed, and sites that use recycled water for irrigation or fountains 2-3
Letters, postcards, and flyers mailed to residents and businesses impacted by water use regulations
2-3
Outreach materials and drought notices mailed to the hospitality industry, including restaurants and lodging
2-3
Flyers posted in public places such as libraries and neighborhood centers or distributed to targeted areas
2-3
Targeted outreach and technical assistance to highest water users in each classification
2-3 Coordination with school district to send messaging to parents/guardians 2-3
Assembly and promotion of the speaker’s bureau for water shortage presentations for neighborhood associations, gardening clubs, HOAs, churches, senior centers, business associations, community groups, property management companies, etc. 2-3
Creation and promotion of videos through City TV and rotation scrolls to display on City TV between programs
4 Signage posted at nurseries and irrigation supply stores, possibly to include receipt attachments
4 Increased outreach to the certified Green Gardeners email and mailing list 4 Increased coordination with the local landscaping industry, including water shortage information in their newsletters, publications, and facilities: California Landscape Contractors Association Channel Islands Chapter, Santa Barbara Botanic Garden, UCCE Master Gardeners, the Permaculture Network, local wholesale and retail nurseries, and irrigation supply stores Note: If a water shortage progresses through multiple stages, all measures in the previous stage(s) are implemented in addition to current stage actions.

City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 27

7.0 Compliance and Enforcement
With the exception of irrigation system standards for new homes and buildings, which are administered and enforced through the Building Permit process, all of the prohibitions in Table 5-1 are subject to the “Penalties and Charges” provisions of SBMC Section 14.20. 226–227, as summarized below:

Violations of SBMC Chapter 14.20:

1. First violation within the past year: Written “Notice of Violation” sent to the account holder and serves as a warning

2. Second violation within the past year: Penalty of up to $250 applied to the account holder’s bill

3. Third violation within the past year: Penalty of up to $250, plus possible installation of a flow restrictor

4. Fourth and subsequent violations within the past year: Penalty of up to $250, plus possible installation of a flow restrictor or possible service shutoff Account holders are provided with an opportunity for a hearing before the Water Resources Director. See Attachment 1 for the complete text of SBMC Chapter 14.20.

8.0 Legal Authority
SBMC Section 14.20 (Attachment 1) establishes authority for the City Council to adopt resolutions declaring water shortage conditions and adopt appropriate restrictions and prohibitions on water use. Although the SBMC does not apply to water service areas outside City limits, the County of Santa Barbara will adopt the water shortage resolution when necessary, allowing the City to enforce the regulations in those parts of the County located within the City’s water service area. Such resolutions can be adopted at any weekly meeting of the City Council. Attachment 1 contains the full text of SBMC Section 14.20. Attachment 2 contains an example water shortage resolution from 2017.

9.0 Financial Consequences of WSCP
Implementation
As the City activates different stages of response to water supply conditions, the financial position of the water utility is impacted both in revenues and expenses. The operating cost structure of the utility is largely fixed and independent of the level of customer demands.

However, the City’s water rates are structured such that approximately 30% of rate revenues City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 28
are collected from fixed monthly service charges and 70% are collected from consumptionrelated charges. This type of rate structure, combined with tiered pricing, promotes conservation and the efficient use of water and allows customers to considerably change their monthly water bill by using more or less water. As a result of this rate structure, however, when the utility experiences decreasing demand, as is expected when the City activates shortage response actions, there is an immediate impact on revenues, as the majority of revenue comes from volumetric charges. In contrast, the City’s operating costs are only slightly reduced because many of the operating costs are fixed.

Although there are some reductions in operating costs related to treatment and delivery of drinking water, the total revenue requirement of the utility generally increases during water shortages. Primarily, this increase is related to the procurement or development of additional water supplies, which can be expensive and have long-term financial impacts on the water enterprise. The Charles E. Meyer Desalination Plant, for example, was originally constructed during a drought in the early 1990s and was financed through debt obligations that were paid over many years. Similarly, the desalination plant was reactivated in 2017 during the most recent drought of record, and again the City took on debt to finance design and construction of the reactivation. These debt payments will be paid by customers in their water bills over the next 20 years. To a lesser extent, there is an increased need for staff resources to implement and manage a water shortage condition. In the past, the City has increased staffing to provide additional public outreach and support professional staff as their workloads become focused on managing water supplies and communicating with decision makers.

The City has used tiered rates to encourage water conservation since 1989. The current adopted water rates are included in Attachment 4. The tiered system provides standardized allotments for residential customers based on the type of building (single family vs. multifamily) and number of dwelling units. Commercial and industrial allotments are based on historical offpeak usage because appropriate usage rates vary widely for customers in these classes.

Irrigation billing provides a first-tier allotment that is a weather-based water budget sufficient for landscapes that are compliant with the City’s landscape design standards (SBMC §14.23.005, Ordinance 6101, and Council Resolution No. 23-007) (City of Santa Barbara, 2023). Usage in excess of the budget is billed at a higher rate.

The tiered rate system worked well during the 1987–1992 drought when tier allotments and prices were modified as necessary to ensure adequate revenue. The system proved to be workable even for the 50% shortages experienced. The City’s experience has been that tiered prices and allotments are best determined based on actual circumstances rather than trying to determine appropriate values in advance of the drought based on hypothetical situations. During drought, the City moves to an annual rate setting cycle to allow rates to be more responsive to current demands and the financial environment. The City has a comprehensive water rate model used to balance water system revenues and costs under normal and water shortage conditions. A tiered rate system presents challenges with revenue stability under normal conditions and even more so during water shortages. The rate model enables the City to identify City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 29
costs of service for the various water supply sources and system components and apply them in accordance with Proposition 218 to identify suitable water rates to meet revenue requirements.

As described above, the City’s water utility typically experiences increasing costs and decreasing revenues during water shortage events. All things being equal, this type of situation will lead to significant increases in customer rates without mitigating measures. The water utility may choose to use reserves to cover any gaps between operating revenues and expenditures and buffer potential rate increases for customers.

For the City Water Fund, the policies include the following targets for reserve balances:
• Disaster Reserve: 15% of operating budget
• Contingency Reserve: 10% of operating budget
• Capital Reserve: Lessor of 5% of Water Fund asset value, or the average of the planned capital program budgets for the upcoming three fiscal years, excluding major capital projects that will be debt funded.

In addition, it may be necessary to defer certain noncritical capital expenditures to further alleviate rate pressure. However, the long-term deferral of water system infrastructure maintenance leads to increased maintenance costs in the future.

10.0 Monitoring and Reporting
As described in Section 3.0, the City intends to track its supplies and projected demands on an annual basis, and if supply conditions described in Table 4-1 are projected, the City will enact its WSCP. Monitoring demands is essential to ensure the WSCP response actions are adequately meeting required reductions and decreasing the supply and demand gap. This will help analyze the effectiveness of the WSCP or identify the need to activate additional response actions.

The City recently completed an AMI technology project to improve customer service with granular water usage data and customer leak notifications. The City currently has all of its customer connections equipped with AMI. With AMI, the City can use the detailed water usage data to monitor customers’ response and demand reduction due to restrictions for each stage in the WSCP. The many restrictions and prohibitions assigned to each stage in Table 5-1 are inherently flexible so the City can implement certain restrictions, monitor customer usage, and implement additional restrictions if the demand reductions are not sufficient to close the supply and demand gap.

11.0 WSCP Refinement Procedures
The City intends to use this WSCP adaptively to respond to foreseeable and unforeseeable water shortages. The WSCP is used to provide guidance to City Council, staff, and the public by identifying response actions to allow for efficient management of any water shortage with City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 30
predictability and accountability. The WSCP will be revised during the UWMP update cycle to incorporate updated and new information. For example, new supply augmentation actions will be added, and actions that are no longer applicable for reasons such as program expiration will be removed. However, if revisions to the WSCP are warranted before the UWMP is updated, the WSCP will be updated outside of the UWMP update cycle.

12.0 Special Water Feature Distinction
As listed in Table 5-1, there are separate demand reduction actions for decorative water features (including fountains and ponds), and for pools and spas. The City has separate response actions, enforcement actions, and monitoring programs for both decorative water features and pools and spas. Non-pool or non-spa water features may use recycled water, whereas pools and spas must use potable water for health and safety considerations.

Limitations to pools and spas may require different considerations compared to non-pool or nonspa water features.

13.0 Plan Adoption, Submittal, and
Availability
Per Water Code Section 10642, the City provided notice of the availability of the Draft 2025 WSCP and notice of the public hearing to consider adoption of the 2025 WSCP. The public review drafts of the 2025 WSCP were posted prominently on the City’s website, https://SantaBarbaraCA.gov/WaterVision, on May 15, 2026, and more than 14 days in advance of the public hearing. Public hearing notifications were also published in local newspapers.

Copies of the hearing notifications are included in Attachment 5.

The Draft 2025 WSCP was discussed with the Board of Water Commissioners on April 16, 2026. The Commission supported the Plan content and recommendations. A public hearing, with public notice, was held at the same time as the City Council approval and adoption meeting on June 16, 2026. See Attachment 6 for the resolution approving the WSCP.

By July 1, 2026, the adopted 2025 WSCP was submitted to DWR through the WUEData portal and sent to the office of the Clerk of the Board, County of Santa Barbara, and the California State Library and DWR. There are no other cities in which the City provides water. Once the plan has been adopted, a hard copy will be made available for public review during normal business hours at the City Water Resources Department offices (located at 630 Garden Street).

Additionally, an electronic copy will be uploaded to the City’s website within 30 days of the filing date and will be available for public reference.

City of Santa Barbara Public Draft
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan | 31
Based on DWR’s review of the WSCP, the City will make any amendments in its adopted WSCP, as required and directed by DWR. If the City revises its WSCP after the UWMP is approved by DWR, then an electronic copy of the revised WSCP will be submitted to DWR within 30 days of its adoption.

City of Santa Barbara References
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan 32
References
Brown and Caldwell. (2020). City of Santa Barbara Water System Risk and Resilience.

City of Santa Barbara. (2008). Landscape Design Standards for Water Conservation.

City of Santa Barbara. (2023). Water Efficient Landscape Standards, Reolution No. 23-007.

City of Santa Barbara Office of Emergency Services. (2021). Emergency Response Plan.

City of Santa Barbara Parks and Recreation Department. (2014). 2014 Strategic Drought Response Plan.

Williams, A. P. (2020, April 17). Large Contribution from Anthropogenic Warming to an Emerging North American Megadrought. Science, pp. 314-318.

WSC. (2021). City of Santa Barbara Long-Term Supply Plan.

City of Santa Barbara
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan I
Attachment 1- Santa Barbara Municipal
Code Chapter 14.20
CHAPTER 14.20

WATER REGULATIONS
§ 14.20.005. Use of Water.

The use of all water obtained by or through the distribution facilities of the City shall be governed and controlled by the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 4558, 1989)
§ 14.20.007. Prohibition Against Waste of Water.

It shall be a violation of this chapter for any consumer or account holder to waste any water obtained from or through the distribution facilities of the City. (Ord. 4558, 1989)
§ 14.20.010. Wasting Water - Repairs - Temporary Shut-Off.

Property owners are required to repair water pipes, faucets, valves, plumbing fixtures, irrigation systems, or any other devices, to eliminate leaks and prevent waste of water.

Upon reasonable notice or attempted notice to the occupant, the City may, but has no duty to, temporarily shut off service to any lot where the City reasonably believes there is a leak or other plumbing failure that is resulting in waste of water as demonstrated by water flowing off the property, excessive flow through the meter, or other facts indicating a leak or other plumbing failure. The City shall post a notice on the property stating that the service has been temporarily shut off to prevent further waste of water and advising the customer how to contact the City for restoration of service. Service will be restored upon determination by the Director that the condition that resulted in the disconnection has been corrected. The City will not charge a service fee for temporary shut off or restoration of service.
(Prior code §44.30; Ord. 2931 §2, 1963; Ord. 5847, 2018) § 14.20.040. City's Relation to Seepage, Etc. - Damage on Private Property.

The City is not responsible for damage to property or injury to persons arising from the installation, maintenance, condition, or use of pipes, plumbing systems, fixtures and other devices located on private property.
(Prior code §44.33; Ord. 2931 §2, 1963; Ord. 5847, 2018) § 14.20.050. Protection of City Water System - Prohibited Activity.

No person shall operate, tamper with, connect to, damage, or modify in any manner any meter, valve, pipe, pump, or other component of the City water system unless the person has obtained a written permit from the Director issued in accordance with this title. This section does not apply to work by City employees or contractors in the performance of their official duties.
(Prior code §44.34; Ord. 2931 §2, 1963; Ord. 5847, 2018) City of Santa Barbara, CA
§ 14.20.005 § 14.20.060
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/SA5006 on 2026-03-02 § 14.20.060. Preventing Access to Water System Facilities Prohibited.

No person shall place upon or about a fire hydrant, curbcock, meter, valve, pump, water gate, or other City water facility any vegetation, object, material, debris or structure of any kind that obstructs or prevents free access by City employees or contractors. The City may remove any vegetation, object, material, debris, or structure placed in violation of this section.
(Prior code §44.42; Ord. 2931 §2, 1963; Ord. 5847, 2018) § 14.20.070. Consumer Precautions in Case of Fire.

In case of fire, consumers shall be required to shut off all irrigation or any steady flow of water being used when the fighting of any fire reasonably necessitates the same. (Prior code §44.43; Ord. 2931 §2, 1963)
§ 14.20.080. Right of Access to Water Meters.

Any duly authorized representative of the City shall at all times have the right of ingress to and egress from any water meter located upon a consumer's premises by way of such easement, license or right-of-way, if any, as the City may own and for such purposes as are permitted by the easement, license or right-of-way. (Prior code §44.44; Ord. 2931 §2, 1963; Ord. 4250, 1984; Ord. 4558, 1989) § 14.20.090. Access to Meters Inside Premises.

Where a water meter is placed inside the premises of a consumer, provision shall be made for convenient meter reading and repairing by representatives of the City, for shutting off or turning on water service, and for installation or removal of flow restricters.
(Prior code §44.45; Ord. 2931 §2, 1963; Ord. 4250, 1984; Ord. 4558, 1989) § 14.20.100. Shutting Off Water for Repairs, Etc., and Notice.

The City reserves the right to shut off the water from any premises, or from any part of the distribution system, as long as necessary, without notice to the consumer, at any time when the exigencies of the occasion may require it; but in all cases of extension or connections the Department shall notify consumers of the necessity of shutting off water and the probable length of time the water shall be shut off before taking such action. (Prior code §44.46; Ord. 2931 §2, 1963)
§ 14.20.105. Shutting Off Irrigation Meters.

The City shall have the right to shut off water service to meters restricted to irrigation uses temporarily and as necessary to determine that the use of such meters is limited to irrigation. Any person applying for service through a meter restricted to irrigation uses shall be informed of such conditions of use at the time he or she applies for such a meter. (Ord. 4558, 1989)
City of Santa Barbara, CA
§ 14.20.060 § 14.20.108
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/SA5006 on 2026-03-02 § 14.20.108. Place of Use of Water.

Except as otherwise provided in this title or as specifically authorized by the Director, water received from or through a meter may be used only on and for the property served by that meter.
(Ord. 4558, 1989)
§ 14.20.110. Tanks Required for Steam Boilers.

No stationary steam boiler shall be connected directly with the water distribution system of the City but in each and every case, a suitable tank of storage capacity, sufficient for 12 hours supply for such boiler, shall be provided and the service pipe supplying such tank shall discharge directly into the top of such tank. (Prior code §44.47; Ord. 2931 §2, 1963)
§ 14.20.130. Unlawful Use of Water and Meter Removal.

It is unlawful:
(Ord. 5653, 2014)
§ 14.20.140. Illegal Consumption Shown by Meter.

When a meter shows a consumption of water after service has been officially discontinued, the owner of the property served shall be held responsible for such consumption, in addition to which he or she shall pay to the City a service restoration fee and the water shall not again be turned on for either owner or tenant until such illegal consumption has been fully paid for.
(Prior code §44.50; Ord. 2931 §2, 1963; Ord. 4250, 1984) § 14.20.150. Reconnection.

A. For a person or entity that is not an Account Holder to use water through a Meter, unless such person or entity is authorized by agreement with the Account Holder to use such water through such Meter;
B. For a person or entity to use water from a fire hydrant, except as authorized by a permit issued by the Public Works Director;
C. For a person or entity to use water from a dedicated fireline except in response to a fire or in the minimum amount needed to perform maintenance of such fireline, or as authorized by the Public Works Director;
D. For a person or entity to use water from a Connection that does not have a Meter, except as expressly authorized by the Public Works Director; E. For a person or entity to use water from a Meter for which there is no active Account Holder; and
F. For any person or entity to remove a Meter from a Water Service, except as authorized by the Public Works Director.

City of Santa Barbara, CA
§ 14.20.108 § 14.20.150
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/SA5006 on 2026-03-02 (Prior code §44.51; Ord. 2931 §2, 1963; Ord. 4250, 1984; Ord. 5847, 2018) § 14.20.170. Notice Upon Vacating Premises - Required.

Prior to vacating any premises connected to the City water supply system, the consumer shall request that the City terminate service and prepare a final billing. (Prior code §44.53; Ord. 2931 §2, 1963; Ord. 4250, 1984) § 14.20.180. Department to Read Meter on Receipt and Stop Service.

Within two working days of receipt of the notice required by Section 14.20.170, the City shall read the water meter and shut off the water to the premises. (Prior code §44.54; Ord. 2931 §2, 1963; Ord. 4250, 1984) § 14.20.215. Water Use Regulations During Water Shortage Conditions.

A. After water service has been discontinued to any premises, it shall not be restored except by the Department. Service may not be restored until a written application signed by the account holder, upon forms furnished by the Department, has been filed with the Department and approved by the Director.

B. The Director may approve a service restoration upon the Director's determination that the connection complies with the requirements of this chapter and the applicant has paid all required reconnection fees in an amount established by City Council resolution.

A. Water shortage conditions. A Stage One Water Shortage Condition, a Stage Two Water Shortage Condition and a Stage Three Water Shortage Condition are defined as short-term conditions declared by resolution of the City Council upon being advised by staff that projected water supply conditions warrant response measures consistent with those associated with corresponding stages in the City's adopted Water Shortage Contingency Plan. The Council resolution may identify and refer to such short-term conditions in terms or titles specific to the current water shortage.

B. Regulations during water shortage conditions. Upon adoption by the City Council of a resolution declaring a Stage One Water Shortage Condition, a Stage Two Water Shortage Condition or a Stage Three Water Shortage Condition, or such other titles as may be selected by Council pursuant to subsection A, the City Council may adopt a resolution containing such rules and regulations as necessary to restrict and regulate use of water from the City's water supply system in order to protect the public health and safety. Failure of any person or entity to comply with such rules and regulations as adopted by resolution of the City Council is a violation of this code subject to the remedies and penalties provided herein and as provided by Chapter 1.28 and as otherwise provided by law.

C. Exemptions. Exemptions to the water use regulations set forth by City Council resolution during a declared Stage One, Stage Two or Stage Three Water Shortage Condition may be granted by the Public Works Director for specific uses of water on the basis of factually demonstrated need or undue hardship and in accordance with guidelines for exemptions as may be determined by the Public Works Director.

City of Santa Barbara, CA
§ 14.20.150 § 14.20.215
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/SA5006 on 2026-03-02 (Ord. 4558, 1989; Ord. 5653, 2014)
§ 14.20.225. Violations.
(Ord. 4558, 1989; Ord. 5653, 2014)
§ 14.20.226. Penalties and Charges.

If the Public Works Director denies a request for an exemption for a specific water use, a written request for reconsideration may be made to the Board of Water Commissioners. The decision of the Water Commission shall be final.

D. Upon the declaration of and during a Water Shortage Condition, the failure of a mobilehome park owner to introduce water into a swimming pool or spa located in a mobilehome park, in accordance with the City Council resolution, shall not be considered an increase in "rent" for purposes of Municipal Code Section

26.08.030.N.

A. Any failure to comply with a provision of this chapter shall constitute a violation of this code, regardless of whether the failure to comply is caused by an Account Holder, a Consumer or any other person or entity.

B. Where the failure to comply with this chapter is continuing and reasonably preventable by the person or entity failing to comply, each successive hour of such failure to comply shall be a separate and distinct violation.

A. In addition to the penalties and other methods of enforcement provided in Chapter

1.28, the following penalties may also be applied to any violation of any provision of this chapter:

1. For the first violation within the preceding 12 calendar months, the Director shall issue a written notice of the fact of such violation.

2. For a second violation within the preceding 12 calendar months, the Director shall impose a penalty on the bill of the Account Holder for the property where the violation occurred or is occurring, in an amount not to exceed $250.00.

3. For a third violation within the preceding 12 calendar months, the Director:
a. Shall impose a penalty on the bill of the Account Holder for the property where the violation occurred or is occurring, in an amount not to exceed $250.00; and
b. May install a flow restricter on the service where the violation occurred or is occurring, for a period to be determined by the Director.

4. For a fourth and any subsequent violation within the preceding 12 calendar months, the Director:
a. Shall impose a penalty on the bill of the Account Holder for the property where the violation occurred or is occurring, in an amount not to exceed $250.00; and
City of Santa Barbara, CA
§ 14.20.215 § 14.20.226
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/SA5006 on 2026-03-02 (Ord. 4558, 1989; Ord. 5653, 2014)
§ 14.20.227. Notice of Violation - Hearing.
b. May install a flow restricter on or shut off water service to the property where the violation occurred or is occurring, for a period to be determined by the Director.

B. If a flow restricter is installed or water service shut off pursuant to subsection A of this section, prior to restoration of normal water service the Account Holder whose service is affected shall be required to reimburse the City for all costs it has incurred and will incur in installing and removing a flow restricter and in shutting off and turning on water service.

C. Any penalty imposed pursuant to this section shall be added to the account of the Account Holder for the property where the violation occurred or is occurring and shall be due and payable on the same terms and subject to the same conditions as any other charge for regular water service.

A. For each violation of this chapter, the Director shall give notice as follows:

1. By sending written notice through the U.S. mail to the Account Holder for the property where the violation occurred or is occurring, at the current billing address shown in the City's water billing records; and

2. By personally giving written notice thereof to the person who committed the violation or by leaving written notice with some person of suitable age and discretion at the property where the violation occurred or is occurring; or

3. If neither the person who committed the violation nor a person of suitable age and discretion can be found, then by affixing written notice in a conspicuous place on the property where the violation occurred or is occurring.

B. Any written notice given under this section shall contain a statement of:

1. The time, place and nature of the violation;

2. The person(s) committing the violation, if known;

3. The provision(s) of this chapter violated;

4. The possible penalties for each violation;

5. The Account Holder's right to request a hearing on the violation and the time within which such a request must be made; and

6. The Account Holder's loss of the right to a hearing in the event the Account Holder fails to request a hearing within the time required.

C. Any Account Holder provided a notice of violation in accordance with the provisions of this chapter shall have the right to request a hearing. The request must be made in writing and must be received by the Director within 10 calendar days of City of Santa Barbara, CA
§ 14.20.226 § 14.20.227
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/SA5006 on 2026-03-02 (Ord. 4558, 1989; Ord. 5653, 2014)
the date of the notice of violation. The Director shall conduct the hearing, at which both written and oral evidence may be presented, and shall decide whether a violation occurred and the appropriate penalty. In determining the appropriate penalty, the Director shall consider whether the Account Holder knew of the violation at the time it occurred and whether he or she took reasonable action to correct the violation upon notification of it. In addition, the Director shall exercise his or her discretion in accordance with such guidelines as the City Council may adopt by resolution.

1. For a first, second or third violation within a 12 month period, the decision of the Director shall be final.

2. For a fourth or subsequent violation within a 12 month period, the Account Holder shall have the right to appeal the decision of the Director by requesting a hearing before the Board of Water Commissioners ("Board"). The request for hearing before the Board shall be in writing and shall be delivered to the Director not later than seven calendar days after the date of the decision of the Director. At the hearing, the Board may receive and hear both written and oral evidence and shall have the authority to affirm, reverse, or modify the decision of the Director. The decision of the Board shall be final.

D. If an Account Holder fails to request a hearing before the Director or the Board within the period(s) provided in this section, the action of the Director shall be deemed final.

E. Water service shall not be shut off until a notice of violation has become final or there is a final decision of the Director or the Board ordering the shut-off of water service.

City of Santa Barbara, CA
§ 14.20.227 § 14.20.227
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/SA5006 on 2026-03-02 City of Santa Barbara
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan II
Attachment 2- Water Shortage Resolution

City of Santa Barbara
2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan III
Attachment 3- City of Santa Barbara
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex
City of Santa Barbara
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
An Annex to the Santa Barbara County
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
February 2023
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan i
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Content

1.0 Introduction....................................................................................................................................................1

2.0 Plan Purpose and Authority........................................................................................................................2

3.0 Planning Process...........................................................................................................................................6

3.1 Overview...................................................................................................................................................6

3.2 Mitigation Advisory Committee (MAC)................................................................................................ 7

3.3 Local Planning Team (LPT)......................................................................................................................8

3.4 Public Outreach and Engagement......................................................................................................10

4.0 Capability Assessment...............................................................................................................................10

4.1 Community Profile and Demographics ..............................................................................................10

4.2 Key Departments...................................................................................................................................11

4.2.1 City Administrator’s Office..........................................................................................................13

4.2.2 Santa Barbara Airport ................................................................................................................13

4.2.3 City Attorney Department...........................................................................................................14

4.2.4 Community Development Department.......................................................................................14

4.2.5 Finance Department......................................................................................................................14

4.2.6 Fire Department ............................................................................................................................15

4.2.7 Human Resources...........................................................................................................................17

4.2.8 Information Technology................................................................................................................17

4.2.9 Public Library System...................................................................................................................18

4.2.10 Parks and Recreation Department.............................................................................................18

4.2.11 Police Department.........................................................................................................................19

4.2.12 Public Works Department ...........................................................................................................19

4.2.13 Sustainability and Resilience Department................................................................................20

4.2.14 Waterfront Department ..............................................................................................................21

4.3 Administrative and Technical Capacity .............................................................................................22

4.4 Legal and Regulatory Capabilities....................................................................................................23

4.5 GIS, Computer and Communication Technology..............................................................................23

4.6 Financial Resources................................................................................................................................24

4.7 Education and Outreach Capabilities................................................................................................26

4.8 Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances..........................................................................................27

4.8.1 The General Plan..........................................................................................................................27

4.8.2 Zoning Ordinance .........................................................................................................................28

4.8.3 Floodplain Management .............................................................................................................28

4.8.4 Safety Element...............................................................................................................................29

4.8.5 Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan and Vulnerability Assessment ...........................................29

4.8.6 Community Wildfire Protection Plan .........................................................................................29

4.9 Opportunities for Mitigation Capability Improvements.................................................................30

5.0 Hazard Assessment....................................................................................................................................31

5.1 Overview.................................................................................................................................................31

5.2 Hazard Screening/Prioritization.........................................................................................................31

5.3 Hazard Profiles......................................................................................................................................32

5.3.1 Wildfire ..........................................................................................................................................32

5.3.2 Earthquake & Liquefaction..........................................................................................................37

5.3.3 Flood................................................................................................................................................42

5.3.4 Pandemic/Public Health Emergency..........................................................................................46

5.3.5 Tsunami .............................................................................................................................................48

5.3.6 Drought and Water Shortage....................................................................................................50

5.3.7 Energy Shortage and Resiliency ................................................................................................52

5.3.8 Dam Failure....................................................................................................................................53

5.3.9 Landslide.........................................................................................................................................55 ii February 2023

5.3.10 Train Accident................................................................................................................................58

5.3.11 Aircraft Crash ................................................................................................................................59

5.3.12 Coastal Hazards ...........................................................................................................................60

5.3.13 Extreme Heat.................................................................................................................................62

5.3.14 Hazardous Materials Release ....................................................................................................64

5.3.15 Oil Spill ...........................................................................................................................................65

6.0 Vulnerability Assessment...........................................................................................................................66

6.1 Wildfire...................................................................................................................................................74

6.2 Earthquake & Liquefaction ..................................................................................................................77

6.3 Flood ........................................................................................................................................................88

6.4 Tsunami ....................................................................................................................................................92

6.5 Dam Failure.............................................................................................................................................94

6.6 Landslide .................................................................................................................................................96

6.7 Coastal Hazards....................................................................................................................................99

7.0 Mitigation Strategy ................................................................................................................................102

7.1 Mitigation Goals and Objectives ....................................................................................................102

7.2 Mitigation Progress ............................................................................................................................104

7.3 Mitigation Approach..........................................................................................................................106

7.4 Implementation Plan...........................................................................................................................107

8.0 Plan Maintenance....................................................................................................................................143

8.1 Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan............................................................................143

8.2 Implementation through Existing Plans and Programs................................................................. 144

8.3 Ongoing Public Outreach and Engagement..................................................................................145

8.4 Point of Contact...................................................................................................................................145

9.0 References................................................................................................................................................145 List of Figures
Figure 5-1. Santa Barbara County Fire Hazard Severity Zones...............................................................36 Figure 5-2. Santa Barbara County Probability of Shaking 2% in 50 Years..........................................40 Figure 5-3. Santa Barbara County Liquefaction Severity...........................................................................41 Figure 5-4. Santa Barbara County FEMA Flood Hazards ..........................................................................45 Figure 5-5. South Coast Tsunami Hazard Area.............................................................................................51 Figure 5-6. Landslide Susceptibility in Santa Barbara County ..................................................................57 Figure 6-1. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities within Wildfire Threat Zones...............................75 Figure 6-2. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities and Earthquake Groundshaking Potential (Red Mountain Fault 7.4 Magnitude ShakeMap) ...................................................86 Figure 6-3. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities and Liquefaction Potential...................................87 Figure 6-4. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities in FEMA Flood Hazard Zones..............................91 Figure 6-5. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities in Tsunami Hazard Zone.......................................93 Figure 6-6. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities in Dam Inundation Zone........................................95 Figure 6-7. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities within Landslide Susceptibility Zones.................98 Figure 6-8. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities in Sea Level Rise Coastal Hazard Zones....... 101 City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan iii
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan List of Tables
Table 3-1. Mitigation Advisory Committee (MAC) Meetings Summary..................................................... 7 Table 3-2. City of Santa Barbara Local Planning Team 2022................................................................... 8 Table 3-3. Local Planning Team Activity Summary ....................................................................................... 9 Table 4-1. City of Santa Barbara Administrative and Technical Capacity............................................22 Table 4-2. City of Santa Barbara Legal and Regulatory Capability.....................................................23 Table 4-3. City of Santa Barbara Fiscal Capability ..................................................................................25 Table 5-1. City of Santa Barbara Local Priority Hazards.........................................................................31 Table 5-2. Richter Scale....................................................................................................................................37 Table 5-3. Southern California Region Earthquake Likelihoods................................................................39 Table 6-1. Critical Facilities in the City of Santa Barbara ........................................................................66 Table 6-2. Summary of Potential Impacts on Critical Facilities.................................................................73 Table 6-3. City of Santa Barbara at Risk to Wildfire Threat...................................................................74 Table 6-4. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities Vulnerable to Wildfire.........................................76 Table 6-5. City of Santa Barbara at Risk to Liquefaction Hazard by Property Type ........................77 Table 6-6. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities Vulnerable to Groundshaking & Liquefaction .....................................................................................................................................78 Table 6-7. City of Santa Barbara FEMA Floodplain Exposure and Loss................................................88 Table 6-8. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities at Risk to Flood Hazard .......................................89 Table 6-9. City of Santa Barbara at Risk to Tsunami Hazard..................................................................92 Table 6-10. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities Vulnerable to Tsunami ..........................................92 Table 6-11. City of Santa Barbara at Risk to Dam Inundation Hazard....................................................94 Table 6-12. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities Vulnerable to Inundation from Dam Failure...............................................................................................................................................94 Table 6-13. City of Santa Barbara Improved Properties at Risk to Landslide Summary......................96 Table 6-14. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities Vulnerable to Landslide .......................................96 Table 6-15. City of Santa Barbara at Risk to Sea Level Rise Coastal Hazards by Property Type..................................................................................................................................................99 Table 6-16. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities Vulnerable to Coastal Hazards....................... 100 Table 7-1. Status of City of Santa Barbara Previous Mitigation Actions ............................................ 104 iv February 2023
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

1.0. Introduction
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 1
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Natural and human-caused disasters can lead to death, injury, property damage, and interruption of business and government services. When they occur, the time, money, and effort to respond to and recover from these disasters divert public resources and attention from other important programs and problems.

However, the impact of foreseeable yet often unpredictable natural and human-caused events can be reduced through mitigation planning. History has demonstrated that it is less expensive to mitigate against disaster damage than to repeatedly repair damage in the aftermath. A mitigation plan states the aspirations and specific courses of action jurisdictions intend to follow to reduce vulnerability and exposure to future hazard events.

The City of Santa Barbara (City) recognizes the consequences of disasters and the need to reduce the impacts of all hazards, natural and human-caused. This annex was prepared in 2022 as part of the update to the County of Santa Barbara (County) Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP). This annex serves as the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) for the City. The LHMP was last comprehensively updated in 2017 as an annex to the 2017 MJHMP. Since 2017, the City has:
• Incorporated the LHMP goals, objectives, and mitigation actions into its local plans and processes, including the General Plan Safety Element by reference and specific hazard planning efforts (e.g., Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan).
• Used the LHMP’s assessment of capabilities, hazards, and vulnerabilities to inform planning, capital improvements, programs, decision-makers, and the public. • Implemented mitigation actions through the City’s general plan, capital improvement program, maintenance programs, grant programming, community outreach, and budget process. • Reviewed and evaluated mitigation actions before and after disasters, including the Thomas Fire and Montecito debris flow.

This 2022 update to the LHMP builds on and refines the MJHMP’s assessment of hazards and vulnerabilities countywide to develop a mitigation plan for the City. The City participated in the 2022 MJHMP Mitigation Advisory Committee (MAC) and Local Planning Team (LPT), reviewed all portions of the MJHMP pertaining to the City, and incorporated relevant components into this annex.

It contains updated capability assessment information, a current vulnerability assessment, and an updated/revised mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex build on approaches employed in the 2022 MJHMP and are explained throughout the following sections.

The 2022 MJHMP update was prepared with input and coordination from each of the county’s eight incorporated cities, six special districts, the County, citizen participation, responsible officials, and support from the State of California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The process to update the MJHMP and this LHMP included over a year of coordination with representatives from all participating agencies within the County and County representatives who comprised the MAC (described further in Section

3.0, Planning Process below). The City is a participating agency in the County’s MJHMP update.

The City’s LHMP is used by local emergency management teams, decision-makers, and agency staff to implement needed mitigation to address known hazards. The MJHMP and this annex can also be

2.0. Plan Purpose and Authority
2 February 2023
used as a tool for all stakeholders to increase community awareness of local hazards and risks and provide information about options and resources available to reduce those risks. Informing and educating the public about potential hazards helps all county residents and visitors protect themselves against their effects.

Risk assessments were performed that identified and evaluated priority hazards that could impact the City. Vulnerability assessments summarize the identified hazards’ impact on the City. Estimates of potential dollar losses to vulnerable structures are presented. The risk and vulnerability assessments were used to determine mitigation goals and objectives to minimize near-term and long-term vulnerabilities to the identified hazards. These goals and objectives are the foundation for a comprehensive range of specific attainable mitigation actions (see Section 7.0, Mitigation Strategy).

2.0 PLAN PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY
Federal legislation historically provided funding for disaster preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation. The Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) of 2000, also commonly known as “The 2000 Stafford Act Amendments” (the Act), constitutes an effort by the federal government to reduce the rising cost of disasters. The legislation reinforces the importance of mitigation planning and emphasizes planning for disasters before they occur.

Section 322 of the DMA requires local governments to develop and submit mitigation plans to qualify for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) funds. The 2022 MJHMP meets the statutory requirements of DMA 2000 (P.L. 106-390), enacted October 30, 2000, and 44 CFR Part 201 – Mitigation Planning, Interim Final Rule, published February 26, 2002. The HMA grants include the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) program, and the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) program. Additional FEMA mitigation funds include the HMGP Post Fire funding associated with Fire Management Assistance Grant (FMAG) declarations and the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) funding associated with the 2018 Disaster Recovery Reform Act (DRRA).

DMA 2000 specifically addresses mitigation planning at the state and local levels. It identifies requirements that allow HMGP funds to be used for planning activities and increases the amount of HMGP funds available to states that have developed a comprehensive, enhanced mitigation plan before a disaster. State, county, and local jurisdictions must have an approved mitigation plan in place before receiving post-disaster HMGP funds. These mitigation plans must demonstrate that their proposed projects are based on a sound planning process that accounts for the risk to and the capabilities of the individual communities.

Local governments have certain responsibilities for implementing Section 322, including:
• Preparing and submitting a local mitigation plan;
• Reviewing and updating the plan every five years; and • Monitoring mitigation actions and projects.

To facilitate implementation of the DMA 2000, FEMA created an Interim Final Rule (the Rule), published in the Federal Register in February of 2002 at section 201 of 44 CFR. The Rule spells out

2.0. Plan Purpose and Authority
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan the mitigation planning criteria for states and local communities. Specific requirements for local mitigation planning efforts are outlined in section §201.6 of the Rule.

In March 2013, FEMA released The Local Mitigation Planning Handbook (Handbook) as the official guide for local governments to develop, update and implement local mitigation plans. The Handbook complements and references the October 2011 FEMA Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide (Guide) to help “Federal and State officials assess Local Mitigation Plans in a fair and consistent manner.” Local jurisdictions must demonstrate that proposed mitigation actions are based upon a sound planning process that accounts for the inherent risk and capabilities of the individual communities as stated in section §201.5 of the Rule. The Handbook and Guide were consulted to ensure thoroughness, diligence, and compliance with the DMA 2000 planning requirements.

DMA 2000 is intended to facilitate cooperation between state and local authorities, prompting them to work together. It encourages and rewards local and state pre-disaster planning and promotes sustainability as a strategy for disaster resistance. This enhanced planning network is intended to enable local and state governments to articulate accurate needs for mitigation, resulting in a faster allocation of funding and more effective risk reduction projects.

This LHMP was prepared as an annex to the County’s MJHMP in compliance with DMA 2000 and applicable FEMA guidance. The following pages show the resolutions that adopt the City’s 2022 LHMP.

RESOLUTION NO. 23-038
A RESOLUTION OF THE C\JV COUNCIL OF THE CIT/ OF
SANTA BARBARA CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE 2022 CIT/

OF SANTA BARBARA ANNEX OF THE SANTA BARBARA

COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION
PLAN
WHEREAS, The Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Act), as described in 44 CFR Section 201. 6 mandates local governments to submit and maintain a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) approved local hazard mitigation plan; WHEREAS, The of City Santa Barbara has participated in a county-wide multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation plan with Santa Barbara County Office of Emergency Management as the Operational Area and lead agency;
WHEREAS, The Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies each jurisdiction's risk assessment and mitigation strategies to reduce the impacts of natural, technological, or intentional disasters on the public and local government; WHEREAS, Identification of hazards in the City assists with response planning, exercise development, public education, and awareness, and other emergency management functions;
WHEREAS, the City's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan will be an Annex to the City's Emergency Operations Plan and a resource for the Safety Element of the City's General Plan in accordance with California Government Code Sections 8685.9 and 65302.6; WHEREAS, The Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires the Plan to be formally adopted by the City Council or governing agency; and
WHEREAS, adopting the City's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan and amending the General Plan to incorporate the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan by reference is exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) through the use of the "General Rule" Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines as adoption of the Amendment will have no potential adverse impact upon the environment because the LHMP will act a guidebook for hazard mitigation strategies but does not implement any specific project, action, or funding.

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Barbara, California, as follows:

1. The City Council approves and adopts the 2022 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan five (5) year update in accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000.

2. The City Council adopts the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan

3. This Resolution is effective upon its adoption.

RESOLUTION NO. 23-038

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA ) ss.
)

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Council of the City of Santa Barbara at a meeting held on April 11, 2023, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Eric Friedman, Alejandra Gutierrez, Oscar Gutierrez, Meagan Harmon, Kristen W. Sneddon, Mayor Randy Rowse
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Mike Jordan
ABSTENTIONS: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Santa Barbara onj!^@|^^. 2Qg.3..,
A^x^t/'/. '^'^
^^^&, '^.... ^""'.^''
s:sswl/:
^^^/fU
"^^.^^ .N-ye.1 minguez
^'.;**.^ y~-^i'^ put Cit Clerk
.
'^&;::"^<?
I HEREBY APPROVE tte%^oir^tel ution on April 13, 2023.

Randy wse
Mayor

3.0. Planning Process
6 February 2023

3.0 PLANNING PROCESS

3.1 OVERVIEW
The planning process implemented for the County’s 2022 MJHMP update, including the City’s LHMP update, utilized two different planning teams to review progress, inform and guide the update, and directly review and prepare portions of the plan, including each jurisdictional annex. The first team is the Mitigation Advisory Committee (MAC) and the second is the Local Planning Team (LPT).

All eight incorporated cities and the six special districts joined the County as participating agencies in the preparation of the MJHMP update, including the cities of Buellton, Carpinteria, Goleta, Guadalupe, Lompoc, Santa Barbara, Santa Maria, and Solvang; and special districts Cachuma Operation and Maintenance Board (COMB), Carpinteria Valley Water District (CVWD), Goleta Water District (GWD), Montecito Fire Protection District (MFPD), Montecito Water District (MWD), and Santa Maria Valley Water Conservation District (SMVWCD). Each of the participating agencies had representation on the MAC and was responsible for the administration of their own LPT. In addition, the MAC included representatives from other state and local agencies with an interest in hazard mitigation in Santa Barbara County, including local non-profit organizations, special districts, and state and federal agencies. This composition ensures diverse input from an array of voices representing all communities within Santa Barbara County.

Both the MAC and the LPTs focused on these underlining philosophies, adopted from the FEMA Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide:
• Focus on the mitigation strategy
The mitigation strategy is the plan’s primary purpose. All other sections contribute to and inform the mitigation strategy and specific hazard mitigation actions. • Process is as important as the plan itself
In mitigation planning, as with most other planning efforts, the plan is only as good as the process and people involved in its development. The plan should also serve as the written record, or documentation, of the planning process.
• This is the community’s plan
To have value; the plan must represent the current needs and values of the community and be useful for local officials and stakeholders. Develop the mitigation plan in a way that best serves your community’s purpose and people.
• Intent is as important as Compliance
Plan reviews will focus on whether the mitigation plan meets the intent of the law and regulation; and ultimately that the plan will make the community safer from hazards.

As a result, the planning process incorporated the following steps:
• Plan Preparation

3.0. Planning Process
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 7
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan • Form/validate planning team members
• Establish common project goals
• Set expectations and timelines
• Plan Development
• Validate and revise the existing conditions/situation within the planning area; • Develop and review the risk to hazards (exposure and vulnerability) within the planning area;
• Review and identify mitigation actions and projects within the planning area; • Finalize the Plan
• Review and revise the plan
• Approve the plan locally and with state and federal reviewers • Adopt and disseminate the plan

3.2 MITIGATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (MAC)
The City participated as a MAC member to prepare this LHMP as an annex to the 2022 MJHMP.

The City was represented by Yolanda McGlinchey, Emergency Services Manager, on the MAC.

The MAC meetings were designed to discuss each component of the MJHMP with MAC members and coordinate annex updates. Table 3-1 below provides a list and the main purpose and topics of each MAC meeting.

Table 3-1. Mitigation Advisory Committee (MAC) Meetings Summary Date Purpose
March 2021
MAC Meeting #1 (virtual)
Provided an overview of the project and why the plan is being revised Reviewed FEMA guidance and processes
Discussed roles and responsibilities of the participating jurisdictions September 2021
MAC Meeting #2 (virtual)
Reviewed goals of the project, role of the MAC
Summarized public outreach results
Presented hazards assessment and displayed select draft hazard maps Conducted interactive exercise to rank hazards
October 2021
MAC Meeting #3 (virtual)
Provided results of hazard ranking methodology
Presented vulnerabilities assessment
Discussed mitigation goals, objectives, and strategies
Reviewed County goals from 2017 and compared them to new goals Conducted interactive exercise on potential mitigation goals and strategies October 2021 MAC Meeting #4 (virtual)
Collected feedback on 2017 mitigation strategies

3.0. Planning Process
8 February 2023
Date Purpose
Conducted interactive exercise on mitigation strategies for key hazards unaddressed in previous MJHMP
Discussed annex updates
January 2022
MAC Meeting #5 (virtual)
Presented draft plan
Discussed key MAC/LPT review needs and key issues
Discussed annex updates to dovetail with plan update
March 2022
MAC Meeting #6 (virtual)
Review and discuss public comments received on the draft plan Recommend a revised draft plan to decision-makers
Review annex updates for review and approval

3.3 LOCAL PLANNING TEAM (LPT)
Table 3-2 lists the City’s LPT. These individuals collaborated to identify the City’s critical facilities, provide relevant plans, report on the progress of City mitigation actions, and provide suggestions for new mitigation actions.

Table 3-2. City of Santa Barbara Local Planning Team 2022 Department Name Title
Airport Aaron Keller Airport Operations Manager
Public Works Adam Hendel Principal Engineer
Sustainability & Resilience Alelia Parenteau Interim Sustainability & Resilience Dept. Director Attorney Ariel Calonne City Attorney
Public Works Ashleigh Shue Principle Engineer
Fire Brady Beck Fire Investigator III
Airport Brian D’Amour Interim Airport Director
Public Works Catherine Taylor Water Services Manager
Community Development Christina Dye Building Official
Fire Christopher Braden Wildland Fire Services Specialist - GIS Finance Doug Smith Accounting Manager
Information Technology Eric Just GIS Coordintor
Waterfront Erik Engebretson Harbor Operations Manager
Parks & Recreation Jazmin LeBlanc Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Public Works Jeff Brent Maintenance Supervisor II
Library Jessica Cadiente Library Director
Public Works Jim Dewey Streets Operations Infrastructure Manager Police Joshua Morton Police Lieutenant
Finance Keith DeMartini Finance Director
Library Kristina Hernandez Library Services Manager
Fire Liliana Encinas Bilingual Public Outreach Coodinator Sustainability & Resilience Melissa Hetrick Administrative Analyst II

3.0. Planning Process
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 9
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Department Name Title
Administration Rene Eyerly Interim Assistance City Administrator Community Development Renee Brooke City Planner
Parks & Recreation Rich Hanna Recreation Program Manager Community Development Rosie Dyste Project Planner
Information Technology Rudy Fidler Information Technology Planner Fire Ryan DiGuilio Fire Marshal
Airport Sara Iza Principal Project Manager
Fire/OES Yolanda McGlinchey Emergency Services Manager
The Santa Barbara LPT members worked directly with the Santa Barbara County Office of Emergency Management (OEM), the consultant team, and each other to provide data, recommended changes, and continually work on the MJHMP and LHMP updates throughout the planning process. The City LPT met virtually as needed during the planning process to discuss data needs and organize data collection. Table 3-3 below outlines a timeline of the LPT's activities throughout the planning process.

Table 3-3. Local Planning Team Activity Summary
Meeting Dates Summary of Activity
February 2020 LPT kickoff meeting to discuss stakeholder and public involvement and refine the scope of hazard analysis
April 2021 to January
2022
Collated data to share with hazard mitigation planning team, including hazard identification, refreshed data layers for maps, and geographic settings.

Completed Plan Update Guides to directly inform hazard priorities and mitigation capabilities
Met with County OEM and consultant staff (12/17/22) to discuss LHMP priorities and mitigation approaches.

April 9, 2021 City LHMP met to review documents and forms needed for the Consultant and County OEM
November 10, 2021
City LHMP to review City’s Goals and Objectives
Review Mitigation Projects, Defer, Complete, Delete or add new projects and review the template for projects from Consultant
Review and revise Mitigation Strategies
January and March 2022
Reviewed new maps and local vulnerabilities.

Provided input on the status of 2017 LHMP mitigation strategies.

Reviewed draft mitigation strategies and provide feedback.

Reviewed and finalized 2022 LHMP
January through April
2022
City’s LHMP meet in various small meetings to complete:

Updated Section 4 – Capability Assessment
Reviewed and updated on Cost-Benefit Worksheet
Mitigation Projects
Review and make comment on City’s Annex to the MJHMP

4.0. Capability Assessment
10 February 2023

3.4 PUBLIC OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT
As a participating agency in the 2022 MJHMP update, the City was directly involved in the outreach program undertaken by the County for the 2022 MJHMP update, which involved extensive outreach during 2021 and early 2022. The City’s MAC and LPT members participated in public outreach efforts for the MJHMP and LHMP update planning process by distributing notices for the 6-monthlong community hazards survey (refer to Section 3.4.1 of the 2022 MJHMP) and three public workshops (refer to Section 3.4.4 of the MJHMP). The Public Outreach Plan (POP) employed a diversity of tools to maximize notification and participation. The POP was responsive to limitations presented by the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and focused on direct bilingual outreach using a variety of digital tools, including a fact sheet, social media posts, emails, and press releases.

Multiple platforms and tools were used to publicize opportunities to participate. All public and stakeholder meetings were hosted virtually through Microsoft Teams, and all outreach completed for the project was conducted via electronic communications. Many of the meetings used an interactive tool called Slido to collect feedback during meetings. Slido allows audience members to answer questions during presentations, helping the County collect direct detailed feedback and facilitate discussion. All written notices were made available in English and Spanish.

Emergency preparedness information is also regularly distributed to the residents and businesses via the City’s website.

In May 2022, the LHMP was completed and made available for public review, concurrent with review by FEMA and CalOES. The City’s Draft LHMP was published on the City OES website for comment. Once approved the plan will be placed on the OES website. The opportunity to review documents was announced through social media, media release and the City’s website. The community was welcome to submit written or verbal comments to the Emergency Services Manager.

In addition, the opportunity for the community to be heard was permitted during the City Council meeting before the adoption of this plan.

4.0 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
The City LPT identified current capabilities and mechanisms available for implementing hazard mitigation activities. This section presents a discussion of the roles of key departments, administrative and technical capacity, fiscal resources, and summaries of relevant planning mechanisms, codes, and ordinances.

4.1 COMMUNITY PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
The City of Santa Barbara is located on the south coast of Santa Barbara County. Due to the Santa Ynez mountain range that blocks colder air from the north, Santa Barbara enjoys mild and pleasant weather. It sits at an elevation of roughly 50 feet above sea level and has a land area of 19 square miles. The City received its name when the California Mission Santa Barbara was founded there in 1786. The mission was known as the Queen of the Missions due to its beauty and the beauty of its surroundings.

Attractions in Santa Barbara include the Waterfront, Downtown retail, entertainment, and cultural districts, Santa Barbara Museums of Art and Natural History, the Santa Barbara Zoo, and special

4.0. Capability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 11
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan events such as Old Spanish Days – Fiesta Santa Barbara. Santa Barbara is the retail, tourism, government, education, and medical center of the County. It is home to the Santa Barbara Airport, which provides commercial services for Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo Counties.

According to 2019 U.S. Census Bureau data, the City is home to 92,034 residents. This population is projected to grow to 98,655 residents by 2050 (SBCAG 2018). The average household size in the City is 2.45 and the median household income is $78,945. Approximately 56.2 percent of City of Santa Barbara residents identify as White, 36.50 percent identify as Hispanic, and 7.4 percent identify as Asian, Black, Mixed, or Other (US Census Bureau 2019).

4.2 KEY DEPARTMENTS
The City of Santa Barbara employs a Manager-Council form of governance. Santa Barbara City Council is comprised of one Mayor and six Council Members, all of whom are elected officials each serving a four-year term. The City of Santa Barbara’s organization is comprised of fifteen departments. These departments are Airport; City Administrator; City Attorney; Community Development; Finance; Fire; Human Resources, Information Technology, Library; Mayor and Council; Parks and Recreation; Police; Public Works; Sustainability and Resilience and Waterfront Departments. In addition, Santa Barbara has 29 Advisory Boards, Commissions, and Committees whose job is to advise the City Council on a wide variety of subjects.

4.0. Capability Assessment
12 February 2023

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA ORGANIZATION CHART

ELECTORATE

MAYOR AND COUNCIL

CITY ATTORNEY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS,

COMMITTEES

AIRPORT SPECIAL PROJECTS

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCE
FIRE

LIBRARY

PARKS & RECREATION

CITY ADMINISTRATOR
POLICE

PUBLIC WORKS

WATERFRONT

HUMAN RESOURCES

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

SUSTAINABILITY & RESILIENCE

4.0. Capability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 13
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Departments involved in activities related to hazard mitigation include:

4.2.1 City Administrator’s Office
The City Administrator’s Office provides leadership, direction, and oversight to City departments to accomplish goals and objectives approved by the City Council, per the City Charter. The City Administrator manages all departments, provides training and development for all City employees, reviews the performance of all City departments, and assists the City Council in prioritizing goals.

The City Administrator’s Office also provides oversight to City TV on Channel 18.

In response to natural disasters, the City Administrator’s Office serves as the primary point of contact to coordinate the entire flow of public information. This is accomplished through the use of media releases, press conferences, website updates, the City TV scroll, public information kiosks, and all other social media outlets. The Administrator’s office works in conjunction with other emergency personnel to coordinate the public release of accurate, timely, and consistent information.

4.2.2 Santa Barbara Airport
The Santa Barbara Airport is one of the region’s most important and visible assets. A recent University of California, Santa Barbara Economic Forecast Project study found that the Airport has a $500 million annual impact on the County. Since the 1930s, it has been the region’s primary air transportation facility. Nearly 1 million passengers used the Airport in 2019; making it the busiest airport on the California coast between San Jose and Los Angeles. Consistent with national trends, air travel through the Santa Barbara Airport declined during the recent pandemic. However, passenger numbers have started to increase through the summer of 2020, and airline forecast studies show the passenger volume will grow over the next 10 years.

The Airport has recently completed a new master plan for development through 2025. The plan identifies Airport facility and capacity needs and prescribes improvements. The Airport must remain open during natural disaster situations to serve as a transportation point for the ingress and egress of personnel, equipment, and supplies during the recovery phase of a disaster. The Airport completed a master drainage plan to address flooding issues, and several of the recommended projects from the plan have been completed. The remaining flood control projects are listed in this document as potential projects for funding.

Approximately 400 of the 430 acres of the Goleta Slough Ecological Reserve are within Airport boundaries. As a steward of the slough, the Airport has made significant environmental improvements with plans for further restoration in the future.

In 2008, the Airport completed its airfield safety projects, which brought the runway safety areas up to federal standard and reduced the commercial runway flood hazard.

As mitigation for the Airfield Safety Projects, the Airport has spent nearly $9 million to improve or restore 40 acres of wetland habitat in the Goleta Slough. Ten of those acres were completed in 2010 after a 3-year study of bird behavior in tidal wetlands. The results of this study show that the restoration of tidal circulation has improved habitat for wildlife while reducing the risk of wildlife strikes on or near the airfield. This study has national significance as other airports may follow in

4.0. Capability Assessment
14 February 2023
Santa Barbara’s footsteps. Each restoration site is overseen in a 7-year maintenance and monitoring program to ensure success, no concerns followed the conclusion of the monitoring program in 2017.

4.2.3 City Attorney Department
The City Attorney’s Office is responsible for legal representation and advice to the City Council, Boards, Commissions, and all City officers and staff. These responsibilities include advising the City Council and Planning Commission, as well as City staff, on thousands of matters each year. The office is also responsible for all City code enforcement and litigation services. The office is staffed by six attorneys and five support and paraprofessional staff.

4.2.4 Community Development Department
The Community Development Department is responsible for planning and zoning, building and safety, and housing and redevelopment for the City of Santa Barbara.

The Building & Safety Division is responsible for Building Inspection and Code Enforcement; Building Counter and Plan Review; and Records, Archives, and Clerical Services. One of the primary functions of this division is to ensure all new and remodeled structures, as well as additions to existing structures, are constructed to current health and safety codes, thus lessening the potential impact of hazards.

The Planning Division is responsible for Long Range Planning and Special Studies; Zoning Ordinance Information; Development / Environmental Review; and Design Review and Historic Preservation.

This division mitigates natural and human-caused hazards for new and existing development through the implementation of the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Local Coastal Plan, the Subdivision Map Act, and a variety of other California planning statutes.

The primary responsibilities of this division in mitigating hazards are through 1) developing General Plan and Coastal Zone goals, policies, and implementation actions that address natural and humancaused hazards(e.g., the Safety Element and the Coastal Land Use Plan); 2) mapping geologyrelated hazards and providing guidelines for site-specific geological investigations for various types of development projects via the Geology and Geohazards Master Environmental Assessment; 3) review and permitting of development consistent with hazard risk reduction and community resilience-related goals, polices, and procedures; and 4) enforcing existing development to ensure continued compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, all divisions of the Community Development Department are regularly trained to respond to disasters and assist with recovery efforts.

4.2.5 Finance Department
The Finance Department is responsible for providing financial expertise and guidance to the City Council and City Departments, managing the City's daily operations, and maintaining the financial integrity of the City. The Finance Department consists of five divisions, Administration, Accounting, Risk Management, Treasury, and General Services, which encompass sixteen programs.

4.0. Capability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 15
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

4.2.6 Fire Department
The mission of the Fire Department is to serve and protect the community from the perils of fires, medical emergencies, environmental emergencies, and natural disasters. This will be accomplished through education, code enforcement, planning, prevention, emergency response, and disaster recovery. The Fire Department is responsible for managing the following programs, Fire Administration; Fire Prevention; Wildland; Office of Emergency Services; and Fire Operations.

Fire Administration provides leadership, policy direction, and administrative support to the entire department. Fire Prevention protects life, property, and the environment from the perils of fire, hazardous materials, and other disasters through proactive code enforcement, modern fire prevention methods, fire and arson investigation, and progressive public safety education, which provides fire and life safety education to the whole community to reduce the loss of life and property. Wildland Division ensures a safer community in the wildland-urban interface through analysis, defensible space, evacuation planning, education, enforcement and fuels modification The Office of Emergency Services coordinates the City’s response to a disaster, educates residents to prepare and operates the City Emergency Operations Center, located at Fire Station 1; Fire Operations saves and protects lives, property, and the environment of the Santa Barbara community by preventing the impact of future events through proactive planning, public education, and occupancy fire code inspections.

In 2004, the City adopted the Wildland Fire Plan as a comprehensive, coordinated plan to mitigate the impact of wildland fire. The plan has recently been designated as the City’s Community Wildfire Protection Plan. The Plan identifies and ranks the City’s high fire hazard areas based on hazard and risk, identifies policies and actions to reduce the community’s threat from wildland fire, and provides a process to prioritize and fund implementation of wildland fire projects. The Plan covers a wide range of areas including defensible space requirements and landscape guidelines, public education and outreach programs, evacuation preplanning, Codes modification and enforcement, fire protection services, post-fire rehabilitation, biomass utilization, and vegetation management programs on both private and public lands. To implement elements of that plan, the City adopted the Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment District (WFSAD) in 2006. The WFSAD provides an alternate funding source for defensible space chipping, vegetation road clearance, vegetation fuels management projects, and voluntary defensible space evaluations for residents located in the Foothill and Extreme Foothill high fire hazard areas. In cooperation with residents of the district, the program has removed hundreds of tons of flammable vegetation, thereby reducing the threat of wildfire and enhancing evacuation routes throughout the district.

City of Santa Barbara Office of Emergency Services Division The City of Santa Barbara’s Office of Emergency Services (OES) is a Division of the Fire Department. The OES office consists of an Emergency Services Manager and a Bilingual Public Outreach Coordinator. The purpose of OES is to develop and implement plans for the protection of persons and property within the City of Santa Barbara in the event of a disaster and to coordinate Emergency Services functions of the City with all other public agencies and affected nonprofits, corporations, and non-governmental organizations.

The City of Santa Barbara’s Emergency Services Organization is managed by the Emergency Services Council (ESC). The City Administrator serves as the Director of Emergency Services and acts

4.0. Capability Assessment
16 February 2023
as chair of the ESC. Other members of the ESC include the Police Chief; Fire Chief; Public Works Director; and representatives of each City department, service, or division designated by the City Administrator. The Emergency Services Manager is responsible for the development and maintenance of emergency plans, per the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS), organization and coordination of emergency programs and training, and is a member of the ESC.

The City of Santa Barbara’s Emergency Services Organization is comprised of all officers and employees of the City, together with those volunteer forces enrolled to aid the City during a disaster, and all groups, organizations, and persons who may by agreement or operation of law, including persons pressed into service under the provisions of Section 9.116.060(3) of the Santa Barbara Municipal Code be charged with duties incident to the protection of life and property in the City during such disaster. This includes, but is not limited to, School Districts, Santa Barbara Community College District, Santa Barbara Metropolitan Transit District, American Red Cross, and Amateur Radio Emergency Services (ARES).

The City of Santa Barbara revised its Standardized Emergency Management System Emergency Operations Plan (SEMS EOP) in August 2019 to ensure the most effective and economical allocation of resources for the maximum benefit and protection of the civilian population in an emergency.

The EOP was developed in conjunction with the Santa Barbara County Operational Area, as part of the California Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and the National Incident Management System (NIMS). The EOP addresses emergency responses associated with natural disasters, technological incidents, and national security. The objective of the plan is to establish an effective organization capable of responding to and recovering from potential large-scale emergencies using all appropriate facilities and personnel in the City. The SEMS EOP assigns tasks and procedures for the coordination of emergency staff and service elements per the Comprehensive Plan Guide 101 (CPG101). The SEMS EOP identifies emergency response actions associated with large-scale emergencies through standard operating procedures.

The plan states that hazard mitigation is a year-round effort and encourages all entities to prepare hazard mitigation plans. The following activities are identified by the plan as potential mitigation activities: improving structures and facilities at risk; identifying hazard-prone areas and developing standards for prohibited or restricted use; recovery and relief from loss; and providing hazard warning.

Santa Barbara Aircraft Rescue (ARFF) and Firefighting Services The Fire Department has been providing ARFF services at the Airport since July 1, 1990, after the Airport Director transferred the service from Santa Barbara County Fire Department. The ARFF Station 8, which was constructed in the early 1990s, was jointly funded by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Improvement Program grants and Airport Capital funds. The Airport provides the two ARFF apparatuses, which were purchased in 2002 with FAA Airport Improvement Program grant funds, as well as a smaller “Rescue Squad” unit. Station 8 also houses the City’s Mass Casualty unit, which can provide EMS supplies and staging equipment for 100 patients.

Additionally, the Airport pays for specialized equipment (silver suits), routine supplies, and services.

The Fire Department provides nine permanent positions - three Captains and six Engineers - to staff the ARFF station on a 24/7 basis. This personnel is trained and certified for airport firefighting (live fire drills), rescue, and EMS operations under both the FAA and City Fire Department requirements.

4.0. Capability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 17
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan To accept commercial air carrier service, an airport is required to obtain certification from the Federal Aviation Administration, per the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 14, Part 139. CFR Part 139 regulations include requirements for equipment, firefighting agents, and operational requirements such as personnel training and emergency response times. All active-duty Fire Department ARFF personnel are compliant with these mandatory FAA requirements.

4.2.7 Human Resources
Human Resources provides a centralized program of personnel administration for approximately 1,050 regular employees (FTE) and approximately 500 hourly employees in 12 departments.

Human Resources oversees programs designed to meet the needs of the City and its employees throughout the employee lifecycle.
• Classification and Compensation: Establishes job classifications and compensation levels for over 400 classifications; manages the HR Payroll System (Munis) concerning job titles, positions, and compensation (COLAS, merit increases, status changes, etc.) • Recruitment and Retention: Recruits, tests, and certifies qualified applicants for City positions; establishes programs that ensure the City is abreast of current trends to stay an employer of choice.
• Employee Relations: Coordinates and assists departments with disciplinary actions, performance issues, grievances, and complaints; provides guidance, interpretation of policies, processes, laws, and MOU and other personnel-related information to employees and departments.
• Civil Service Commission: Provides staff support to the Civil Service Commission. • Benefits and Wellness: Administers employee benefit programs including medical insurance, life insurance, long and short-term disability, flexible spending accounts, deferred compensation and retirement, and leaves of absences.
• Training and Development: Manages employee training through the LEAP programs (Learning for Excellence and Achievement Program), including the City Leadership Academy, City Supervisory Excellence Academy, New Employee Orientation, and Educational Reimbursement.

4.2.8 Information Technology
Information Technology provides Infrastructure support, Enterprise Applications, Web Services, Computer Training, and Centralized GIS. Infrastructure Support provides technical leadership, maintenance, and user support for computing and networking services to City staff by operating and maintaining the City’s 40+ Local Area Networks; providing maintenance and support to over 950 desktop and laptop computers; establishing and maintaining standards for hardware and software; and performing systems analysis, system integration and system implementation; provides consulting services to all departments in areas of business problems, implementing solutions.

Enterprise Applications Support provides financial management systems (including Human Resources and Payroll systems) and related services; maintains enterprise-wide applications such as customer information system for City Utilities, maintenance management, land use permitting, electronic content and agenda management, SQL reporting services, and data exportation to support the

4.0. Capability Assessment
18 February 2023
analysis and inquiry needs of City staff. Web Services establishes standards and provides oversight of the City’s local Intranet and public Website and associated services. Computer Training coordinates the City’s computer training program; provides consulting services to all departments in areas of business problems, implementing solutions. Centralized GIS provides standards and a rules-based central database of GIS data; provides tools to update and display GIS data; and provides detailed maps, drawings, and other GIS services.

4.2.9 Public Library System
The Santa Barbara Public Library is dedicated to supporting community education for all ages through classes and events, building a community of readers, empowering individuals with free access to information, and connecting people to community resources.

In addition to providing free access to physical and digital materials for information and entertainment, the Library provides computer and internet access as well as through technology available for checkout. Library programming offers educational and enrichment opportunities for people of all ages and includes early literacy classes, science, technology, and maker classes, career resources, college readiness classes for teens, one-on-one support for business owners, jobseekers, and those pursuing citizenship, tech classes for seniors, and more. The Library celebrates local Santa Barbara history, supports the local community of artists, writers, and creators, and facilitates opportunities for residents to connect with other community organizations. Santa Barbara library staff work to serve all community members, including Black, Indigenous, and people of color, immigrants, people with disabilities, and the most vulnerable in our communities, offering services and educational resources to help transform communities, open minds, and promote inclusion, diversity, equity, and justice.

The central and Eastside libraries serve the residents of Santa Barbara, while the Carpinteria, and Montecito branch libraries are owned and funded by the County of Santa Barbara and administered under an agreement with the City.

4.2.10 Parks and Recreation Department
The City of Santa Barbara Parks and Recreation Department maintains 60 parks totaling nearly 1810 acres. The Parks Division is responsible for all aspects of parks, open space, street tree care, and beach management, and during emergencies provides logistical support such as personnel and supply transportation. The Recreation Division provides numerous recreational and cultural opportunities as well as community services. During emergencies, the Department manages community buildings and recreation facilities as shelters and staging areas. The Department oversees the management of the City’s municipal golf course, which is a second staging area for emergency operations. The mission of the Creeks Restoration and Water Quality Improvement Division is to improve creek and ocean water quality and restore natural creek systems with the implementation of storm water and urban runoff pollution reduction, creek restoration, and community education programs. The water quality program focuses on creek clean-up, street sweeping, and storm water projects. Creek restoration programs improve creek health and water quality. Objectives include reducing erosion by bank stabilization and providing access where feasible. The Creeks Division has prepared Watershed Action Plans for Santa Barbara’s three major watersheds and has held community forums for public input into these plans.

4.0. Capability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 19
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

4.2.11 Police Department
The mission of the Santa Barbara Police Department, through the philosophy of community-oriented policing, is to create a safe community where all people can live in peace without the fear of crime.

This commitment will ensure a professional quality of service and accountability to the citizens of the City of Santa Barbara.

While the primary mission of the Santa Barbara Police Department is law enforcement, the Police Department plays a pivotal role in general public safety as it relates to disaster preparedness. In addition, the Police Department has created some mitigation strategies that are included in their Unusual Occurrence Manual (UOM). The UOM is a guide for how officers will respond during a major incident or disaster.

The City’s dispatch center was relocated to the Granada Garage facility at 1219 Anacapa Street.

The move was due to the substandard condition of the current Police Department. In many emergencies, police officers are among the first responders, assisting with traffic control, effecting evacuations, and monitoring potentially life-threatening situations.

4.2.12 Public Works Department
The City's largest department is Public Works. The department’s total annual budget of nearly $150 million represents approximately 40% of the City's total budget and its 301 full-time employees are approximately 28% of the City's permanent workforce. The Department is responsible for operating the City's El Estero Water Resources Center and Charles E. Meyer Desalination Plant both on Yanonali Street, the Ortega Groundwater Treatment Plant on Ortega Street, the Cater Water Treatment Facility on San Roque Road, and Mission Tunnel and the Gibraltar Dam and Reservoir located off Paradise Road on the Santa Ynez River. The Department’s mission is to provide for the public's needs relative to the City's water and wastewater systems, construction and maintenance of all City facilities, automotive equipment, communications equipment, City parking lots and structures, and repair and maintenance of all streets, sidewalks, storm drains, traffic signals, and streetlights throughout the City.

The Public Works Department is divided into seven divisions: Administration, Engineering, Facilities, Streets Operations, and Infrastructure, Transportation Planning and Parking, Fleet Management, and Water Resource. The Administration Division provides administrative, personnel, and financial support to the entire department. The Engineering Division is responsible for engineering oversight for design and construction projects; land development; and real property. The Facilities Management Division is responsible for building maintenance; capital building renewal; communications; custodial services; and environmental compliance. The Transportation Planning and Parking Division is responsible for alternative transportation; parking; and transportation planning.

The Streets Operations and Infrastructure Division is responsible for streets maintenance; transportation operations; traffic engineering and streets infrastructure management. The Water Resources Division is responsible for water and wastewater administration; water supply management; water treatment; water distribution; wastewater collection; wastewater treatment; and laboratory services. The Fleet Management Division is responsible for the service, repair, and replacement of all city vehicles and heavy equipment.

The Department is responsible for the following emergency activities and areas:

4.0. Capability Assessment
20 February 2023
• Recovery operations in all types of disasters.
• Coordinating with Public Utility companies in the repair of utilities essential to the life, health, and welfare of the community.
• Coordinating and furnishing transportation to all emergency agencies of the City and providing maintenance for disaster vehicles and equipment throughout the State of Emergency. • Assuring an adequate supply of water for emergency requirements and an adequate supply of potable water for human consumption.
• Assuring that sanitary facilities are operational or that alternate emergency facilities are provided.
• Assuring the Laguna pump station is operating.
• Assisting in and providing for traffic controls (signs, barricades, and signalization) and warning signs.
• Providing personnel to assist in EOC operations (office and field). Setting up and operating the Public Works Department Operations Center.

The Public Works Engineering Division is very involved in hazard mitigation activities. It manages the City's Capital Improvement Program and provides professional engineering services for planning, designing, and constructing public works improvements. Long-range master planning to support the City's street, water, wastewater, transportation, and parking infrastructures is also provided. The Division also provides the Airport, Waterfront, and all General Fund departments with engineering services.

4.2.13 Sustainability and Resilience Department
The City of Santa Barbara Sustainability and Resilience Department leads and coordinates projects, policies, and services related to environmental sustainability and resilience across the City. The Department consists of two divisions: Environmental Services, Energy, and Climate.

The Environmental Services Division provides garbage, recycling, and organics collection, processing, and disposal services for the community. The Division oversees zero waste planning, waste reduction policies, education, and food resilience and security programs. The Division’s CleanSB program provides a suite of neighborhood services including illegal dumping, code enforcement, public area trash collection, encampment cleanup, and disaster debris planning. In the event of a disaster, Environmental Services is responsible for ensuring regular services are reestablished as quickly as possible, coordination with trash collection companies to remove disaster debris safely and efficiently, ensuring adequate disaster debris staging areas and processing, and communication with other regional solid waste agencies and state regulators.

The Energy and Climate Division is responsible for developing and managing the City’s renewable energy and energy efficiency projects, creating and overseeing the Community Choice Energy enterprise, coordinating climate action planning and adaptation efforts, and overseeing other sustainable planning initiatives such as the Green Building policy. The Division is a primary contact for coordination with energy utilities providing power to the community and for coordinating efforts relating to climate hazard mitigation, such as sea level rise.

4.0. Capability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 21
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

4.2.14 Waterfront Department
The Waterfront Department is an Enterprise Fund, which oversees the operations, infrastructure, and public safety within the City of Santa Barbara’s Waterfront area. The Waterfront provides services in support of recreation, commercial fishing, local business, and tourism. The responsibilities of the Waterfront Department include:
• Tidelands and ocean space fronting the City of Santa Barbara • Harbor Business District buildings and infrastructure • Stearns Wharf buildings and infrastructure
• 1100+ Slip Marina and associated facilities
• Breakwater and associated infrastructure
• East Beach mooring areas
• 10 Waterfront parking lots and associated infrastructure The Waterfront Department consists of three Divisions: Harbor Operations, Facilities Management, and Business Services. These three divisions are outlined below.

Harbor Operations Division
Harbor Operations oversees the marina management-related activities within the harbor, which includes oversight of visiting vessels, slip holders, and liveaboards. Additionally, Harbor Operations oversees the Santa Barbara Harbor Patrol. The mission of the Santa Barbara Harbor Patrol is to enforce laws, educate the public and provide emergency fire, medical, and ocean response services to facilitate the safe and orderly use of the Waterfront area.

Facilities Division
The Facilities Division is responsible for the maintenance of all Waterfront facilities and infrastructure, which includes the Harbor Business District, Stearns Wharf, breakwater, marina, parking lots, and all Waterfront buildings. The Facilities Division is tasked with providing clean and safe commercial and recreational facilities for tenants and visitors. The Facilities Division also oversees the Waterfront’s Capital Improvement Program, which includes planning, design, permitting, and construction of all associated projects.

Business Management Division
The Business Management Division oversees all financial and budgeting elements of the entire Waterfront Department. Additionally, the Business Management Division oversees the Department's parking and property management operations. The property management operations include oversight of 61 tenant leases and licenses and associated revenues. The parking operations include 10 Waterfront parking lots and associated revenues.

For Emergency Response, the Waterfront Department is available and ready to respond. The Waterfront Department has the ability to standup a Department Operating Center (DOC) located in the Waterfront Administration Building, which is established to effectively coordinate personnel and resources to effectively respond to specific emergency events. The DOC becomes a base of operations and collection center for information, inspection/damage reports, and response

4.0. Capability Assessment
22 February 2023
strategies as they are developed. For larger, citywide emergency events, the Waterfront Department will coordinate with the City’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and provide support as needed.

4.3 ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPACITY
The administrative and technical capabilities of the City, as shown in Table 4-1, include staff, personnel, and department resources available to implement the actions identified in Section 7.0, Mitigation Strategy of this LHMP. Specific resources reviewed include those involving technical personnel such as planners/engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices, engineers trained in construction practices related to building and infrastructure, planners and engineers with an understanding of natural or manmade hazards, floodplain managers, surveyors, personnel with GIS skills and scientists familiar with hazards in the community. Equipment and supplies are maintained by the Public Works Director.

Table 4-1. City of Santa Barbara Administrative and Technical Capacity Personnel Resources Yes/No Department/Position
Planner/engineer with knowledge of land development/land management practices Yes
Public Works/Senior Planner
Community
Development/Project Planner
Engineer/professional trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Yes Public Works/FacilitiesManager Planner/engineer/scientist with an understanding of natural hazards Yes Community Development/Project Planner
Personnel skilled in GIS Yes
IT/GIS Coordinator
Community Development/GIS
Technician
Full-time building official Yes
Community
Development/Chief Building
Official
Floodplain manager Yes
Community
Development/Floodplain
Coordinator
Emergency manager Yes Fire Department/Emergency
Services Manager
Grant writer Yes Departmental
Other personnel
GIS Data Resources
(Hazard areas, critical facilities, land use, building footprints, etc.) Yes Information Technology/
Community Development and
Public Works
Warning Systems/Services
(Reverse 9-11, cable override, outdoor warning signals) Yes The City uses the County’s notification system
Other N/A

4.0. Capability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 23
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

4.4 LEGAL AND REGULATORY CAPABILITIES
The legal and regulatory capabilities of the City are shown in Table 4-2, including existing ordinances and codes that affect the physical or built environment of Santa Barbara. Examples of legal and/or regulatory capabilities can include the City’s building codes, zoning ordinances, subdivision ordinances, special purpose ordinances, growth management ordinances, site plan review, general plans, capital improvement plans, economic development plans, emergency response plans, and real estate disclosure plans.

Table 4-2. City of Santa Barbara Legal and Regulatory Capability Regulatory Tool
(ordinances, codes, plans) Yes/No
General Plan Yes
Zoning ordinance Yes
Subdivision ordinance Yes
Growth management ordinance Yes
Floodplain ordinance Yes
Other special-purpose ordinances (stormwater, steep slope, wildfire) Yes Building code Yes
Fire code Yes
Fire department ISO rating 2
Erosion or sediment control program Yes
Stormwater management program Yes
Site plan review requirements Yes
Capital improvements plan Yes
Economic development plan Yes
Local emergency operations plan Yes
Other special plans
Tsunami Response Guide
and Watershed
Response Guide – both
to be updated in the fall
of 2021
Flood insurance study or other engineering studies for streams Yes Elevation certificates (for floodplain development) Yes

4.5 GIS, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
The City has a basic GIS system used by the Public Works and Community Development Departments. Currently, parcels, zoning, and flood hazards have been mapped, including water, sewer, storm drain, and citywide striping. Hazard layers created for this plan can be incorporated into that system for future planning and updates. In the event it is needed, the GIS system is fully

4.0. Capability Assessment
24 February 2023
functional and can be used to provide the State of California Office of Emergency Services with preliminary damage assessments.

Using the County’s notification system, Santa Barbara has a fully functional 911 emergency telephone system, dispatch capabilities, and a reverse 911 system to issue warnings in advance of disasters.

The City has a website, which will be used to assist with communication necessary for the implementation and future updates of this plan.

4.6 FINANCIAL RESOURCES
The fiscal year 2022 adopted budget includes a total operating budget of $305.4 million and a citywide capital program of $460 million. The General Fund, which includes traditional local government services, is composed of a $143.8 million operating budget and a $24.5 million capital program.

In addition to the General Fund, the City has other funds used to account for various activities.

Special revenue funds, totaling $32.2 million are used to account for revenues legally restricted for a specific purpose. Enterprise funds, totaling $151.7 million are used to account for the activities of the City operating like the private sector, including water, wastewater, airport, golf, downtown parking, and waterfront operations. Finally, internal service funds, totaling $29.8 million are used to account for services provided internally to City departments and programs, such as Information Systems and Risk Management Services.

In 1996, the City Council established minimum reserve levels for all operating funds, including the General Fund. Under the adopted resolution, the General Fund currently maintains two separate reserves:
• Emergency Reserve – Set at 15% of the adopted operating budget, established to respond to natural disasters, such as floods, earthquakes, etc.
• Contingency Reserve – Set at 10% of the adopted operating budget, established to respond to provide for unique one-time costs and maintenance of City services, and to permit orderly adjustments during periods of reductions.

Table 4-3 shows specific financial and budgetary tools available to the City such as community development block grants; capital improvements project funding; authority to levy taxes for specific purposes; fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric services; ability to incur debt through general obligations bonds; and withholding spending in hazard-prone areas.

4.0. Capability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 25
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Table 4-3. City of Santa Barbara Fiscal Capability
Financial Resources Accessible or Eligible to
Use (Yes/No)
Has This Been Used for
Mitigation in the Past? Comments
Community Development
Block Grants (CDBG) Yes N/A
Capital improvements
project funding Yes Yes
City budgets capital
expenditures across all
funds.

Authority to levy taxes for
specific purposes Yes No
Subject to Voter
Approval. The voters
approved a 1% district
sales tax increase
(Measure C) that took
effect in 2018 that is
being used to maintain
critical infrastructure
across the City.

Fees for water and sewer
service Yes Yes
Fees charged for City
Water, Wastewater,
Solid Waste and soon
Community Choice Energy
Incur debt through general
obligation bonds Yes Yes
Several Enterprise Funds
have current bonds. No
current General Fund debt
at this time. Initial planning
is underway to issue debt
for the new police facility.

Incur debt through special
tax bonds Yes N/A
The City adopted a Debt
Management Plan in
2018
Incur debt through private
activity bonds Yes Yes
The City issued a private
debt in 2014 for
Waterfront capital
projects.

Federal Grant Programs
(Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program)
Yes Yes
The City has been
successful in receiving and
building projects from
Hazard Mitigation Funds.

4.0. Capability Assessment
26 February 2023

4.7 EDUCATION AND OUTREACH CAPABILITIES
The City of Santa Barbara Office of Emergency Services public outreach and education programs offer comprehensive emergency and disaster education to the community to reduce the loss of life and property. It includes activities that are designed to provide a variety of safety programs appropriate for all ages. The programs offered are bilingual in English and Spanish and are listed below:
• Community Disaster Education
• This program is designed to bring disaster education into all venues, including but not limited to, businesses, homeowner associations, community centers, etc. This program is tailored for meetings that have limited time for a presentation. This CDE Presentation will assist in better preparing your staff, residences and/or community for any type of disaster or emergency. • CERT
• The Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) program educates participants about disaster preparedness for hazards that can impact their area and trains them in basic disaster response skills, such as fire safety, light search and rescue, team organization, and disaster medical operations. CERT offers a consistent, nationwide approach to disaster training and organization to assist your family and neighbors. • LISTOS
• This program was developed to provide individuals and families with basic emergency and disaster preparedness education. LISTOS is a basic curriculum offered to all populations that desire to learn in an informal conversational setting about risks and vulnerabilities in their local community.
• Presentations, Drills and Special Events
• The City of Santa Barbara Office of Emergency Services offers specific presentations on all hazards, assists with all hazard evacuation drills upon request and actively participates in community events to provide the public with general safety education. • Social Media
• The City of Santa Barbara Office of Emergency Services conducts regular messaging through a content calendar that aligns with both local and national efforts such as, Tsunami Awareness Month, Earthquake Awareness Month, The Great California Shake Out, National Preparedness Month, Firewise and Firesafe, Storm Ready etc. • The city provides messaging for the public, via social media platforms, such as Facebook, Instagram, Nextdoor, Twitter, the City News in Brief, utility inserts among other local committees and social groups.

4.0. Capability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 27
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan • Included in the city public messaging is partnerships with local media such as local radio, newspaper, and television stations to distribute preparedness and incident specific messaging.

Contacts: Liliana Encinas, Public Outreach Coordinator at 805-564-5778 or [email protected]

4.8 RELEVANT PLANS, POLICIES, AND ORDINANCES
The City of Santa Barbara has a range of guidance documents and plans for each of its departments. These include a general plan, public works, and public utilities plans, capital improvement plans, emergency management plans, Local Coastal Program (LCP), Master Environmental Assessment (MEA), Circulation Element, Safety Element, Mission Creek Project, Conejo Slide Area Program, Airport plans, flood response guidelines, Tsunami Response Plan, Community Wildfire Protection Plan, Sea Level Rise Adaption Plan and Vulnerability Assessment, and slough programs. The City uses building codes, fire codes, zoning ordinances, subdivision ordinances, and various planning strategies to address how and where development occurs. One of the essential ways the City guides its future is through policies laid out in the 2011 Plan Santa Barbara General Plan. The LHMP directly informs these plans and is used to evaluate the need for adjustments or updates to existing plans and programs. The City considers the LHMP’s assessment of capabilities, hazards, and vulnerabilities to inform planning, capital improvements, programs, decision-makers, and the public. The City also implements mitigation actions through the City’s general plan, capital improvement program, maintenance programs, grant programming, community outreach, and budget process.

4.8.1 The General Plan
The City of Santa Barbara General Plan was first adopted in the 1960s and was last updated in 2011. The 2011 General Plan is comprised of a comprehensively updated Land Use Element and seven reorganized elements, including the seven state-mandated elements, as well as optional elements of Economy and Fiscal Health and Historic Resources. The Safety Element was updated in 2013 and the Housing Element is updated every eight years per state law. In 2022, the City initiated an update to the Housing Element and the Safety Element. The LHMP is incorporated by reference in the Safety Element.

Santa Barbara is a mature city, and not much vacant land remains for residential or nonresidential development. The remaining vacant land is generally found in areas of steep topography where development potential is constrained. Over 60 percent of the land is in residential use, excluding the residential portion of mixed-use development in the Downtown or other commercial areas. To encourage residential infill development and due to concern over resources limitations, the General Plan has a Growth Management program to limit nonresidential growth. Conversely, one of the top priorities of the General Plan is to encourage workforce and affordable housing in the City’s multiunit and commercial zones. Institutional and public facilities are mainly found all over the City while most of the City’s government facilities are found in the historical center of the community. There are approximately 1,086 acres of land dedicated open space and parks (not including beaches).

4.0. Capability Assessment
28 February 2023
Since the last update of the City’s LHMP in 2017, land use and population in the City have not substantially changed. Modest development has occurred consistent with the adopted Land Use Element and has primarily comprised infill development and redevelopment within the City limits.

There has been no expansion of the City boundary or its Sphere of Influence (SOI) and no comprehensive changes to the Land Use Element that would result in substantial densification.

Further, City population has not substantially changed. As a result, the City’s level of vulnerability to hazards analyzed in Section 6.0, Vulnerability Assessment, has not substantially changed due to land use, development, or population growth since the last update of the LHMP.

4.8.2 Zoning Ordinance
Local land use controls include the Zoning Ordinance, which shapes the form and intensity of land use and residential development. Consistent with the General Plan, the City's Zoning Ordinance allows a range of zones and dwelling unit densities from one unit per acre (single-unit) to 27 units per acre (studio units with variable density). Higher density residential of 28-36 units per acre and 37 – 63 units per acre (Priority Housing Overlay) is allowed in certain areas under the Average Unit-Size Density Incentive Program. These zones also allow mobile home and emergency shelter units.

Zoning ordinance regulations related to hazard mitigation relate to the risk assessment for hazards within the City, including flooding, faults, unstable soils, and wildfire hazards. Examples of zoning regulations for hazard mitigation include Development Along Mission Creek, which provides controls on development adjacent to Mission Creek to prevent undue damage or destruction of development from flood water; and a slope density regulation that increases the minimum lot area where the average slope from 10 to over 30 percent.

The Environmental Policy and Construction section of the Municipal Code includes regulations and general requirements for hazardous waste generators, seismic safety, flood plain management, erosion and sedimentation control for construction, and construction prohibited in the vicinity of the Conejo Road landslide due to special geologic hazard conditions.

4.8.3 Floodplain Management
The City of Santa Barbara has participated in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) since 1978. Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) were developed most recently in 2015 through the NFIP and have been made available in GIS format as Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps. These are on file with the Santa Barbara County Office of Emergency Management, County Flood Control, and the Santa Barbara City Public Library to identify floodplains, along with evacuation routes and locations of public shelters. The 2018 Floodplain Management Ordinance minimizes public and private losses due to flood conditions in flood prone, mudflow or flood related erosion areas by restricting land use, controlling alteration of natural floodplains, and protecting uses that are vulnerable to floods.

Repetitive Loss (RL) Properties
Repetitive loss properties are defined as property that is insured under the NFIP that has filed two or more claims above $1,000 each within any consecutive 10-year period since 1978. FEMA repetitive loss data shows that there have been 30 properties in Santa Barbara with multiple claims

4.0. Capability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 29
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan against the NFIP. These RL properties have resulted in 65 total losses amounting to approximately $1.5 million in loss payments.

4.8.4 Safety Element
The Safety Element is a required component of the City’s General Plan and is the element most relevant to hazard mitigation and emergency response. The Safety Element was updated in 2013 and includes specific items as prescribed by the California Government Code as well as other relevant safety issues that are considered important. Hazard maps provided in the Safety Element depict the general locations and possible severity of various hazards and are important tools in identifying and reducing the potential effects of hazards and for hazard response planning. The Safety Element provides information to guide the evaluation of hazard-related effects, provides policies to protect the community from hazard-related risk, and supports the implementation of programs intended to enable and expedite the recovery of a community after a disaster occurs.

The Safety Element incorporates this LHMP by reference.

4.8.5 Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan and Vulnerability Assessment The purpose of the City’s Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan is to identify vulnerabilities to coastal hazards expected from sea-level rise in the City of Santa Barbara and possible actions to prepare for and adapt to sea-level rise. Preparation of a sea-level rise adaptation plan was a 2017 LHMP mitigation action and is identified as a priority in the Coastal Land Use Plan, Safety Element, and LHMP. Additionally, the State requires the City, as a trustee of state tidelands, to proactively plan for sea-level rise at the Harbor and Stearns Wharf and to consider sea-level rise as part of coastal development permitting. A vulnerability assessment was prepared for the Adaptation Plan to identify the areas of the city that, in the absence of intervention, are projected to be exposed to sea-level rise and related coastal hazards. The Adaptation Plan provides the framework for the City to monitor sea-level rise impacts and reduce vulnerabilities in phases as specific thresholds for action are reached. A wide range of adaptation options are presented, providing the City flexibility to consider different adaptation strategies over time.

4.8.6 Community Wildfire Protection Plan
The City of Santa Barbara Fire Department (SBFD)’s Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) is maintained to protect lives, property, and natural resources threatened by wildland fire. The CWPP updated the City’s 2004 Wildland Fire Plan, accounting for changes in the City’s fire environment and work completed under that Plan. Development of the CWPP included an assessment of wildfire hazard, which involved modeling potential fire behavior in the City under extreme wind and weather conditions, consistent with conditions experienced during a sundowner wind event. Other wildfire hazard variables were evaluated (terrain, weather, fuels, development patterns, fire department response, structure density, etc.) to identify the High Fire Hazard Area of the City. The hazard assessment was used to evaluate the extent of the City’s four High Fire Hazard Area Zones (Extreme Foothill, Foothill, Coastal Interior, and Coastal) and the locations of the City’s Vegetation Management Units (VMUs) and Community Fuels Treatment Network (CFTN). CWPP development also included development of a Public Outreach and Engagement Plan to guide community engagement and coordination with other key stakeholders throughout the development

4.0. Capability Assessment
30 February 2023
of the CWPP. The City’s central engagement goal was to develop a CWPP that builds on input from key stakeholders, including community members, City departments, neighboring jurisdictions (e.g., Santa Barbara County Fire Department, the U.S. Forest Service), and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. This CWPP outlines a series of policies and action items which are intended to guide implementation of the CWPP. The policies and actions focus on codes and standards, funding, fire rehabilitation, evacuation, fire protection, vegetation/fuels management, and public education. Action items identify tasks to be implemented by the SBFD, and other responsible City departments, to achieve the stated goal of protecting lives, property, and natural resources threatened by wildland fire.

4.9 OPPORTUNITIES FOR MITIGATION CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENTS The City continuously strives to mitigate the adverse effects of potential hazards through its existing capabilities while also evaluating the opportunities for improvements. Based on the capability assessment, the City has existing regulatory, administrative/technical, education/outreach, and fiscal mechanisms in place that help to mitigate hazards. In addition to these existing capabilities, there are opportunities for the City to expand or improve on these policies and programs to further protect the community:
• Regulatory Opportunities: As part of this update, the City will comply with AB 2140 by amending its Safety Element to incorporate the LHMP by reference. The City will consider the LHMP in policy, land use plans, and programs, including coastal hazard and sea level rise planning. For example, the City’s CWPP recommends expanding the geographic extent of the City’s High Fire Hazard Area and increasing the quantity and extent of VMUs based on wildfire hazard. Further, the City’s Sea Level Rise Adaption Plan and Vulnerability Assessment recommends continued effort to improve the quality and accuracy of coastal hazard projections under sea level rise scenarios consistent with local and state guidelines. • Administrative/Technical Opportunities: The City continues to improve its resilience to ensure emergency response operations are sustained during a hazardous event, including improvements to public safety facilities and planning. Enhancements to hazard training for staff in partnership with the County and other agencies or stakeholders would improve the City’s ability to mitigate hazards with the latest knowledge and resources. • Outreach Opportunities: Enhanced community outreach, emergency notifications, and trainings would further enhance the City’s capabilities to respond to and recover from hazards. The City could expand outreach through digital tools such as social media, participate in the Great California ShakeOut, and increase FireWise outreach events and media coverage. • Fiscal Opportunities: The City can update its CIP to include hazard mitigation actions from the LHMP and related documents such as the CWPP and the Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan. The City will continue to seek grants (e.g., HMGP, BRIC) to fund these CIP projects and related projects in the City’s mitigation strategy. The City can seek opportunities to partner with the County and/or other stakeholder agencies in grant applications to address regional hazards more effectively. The City could also consider expanding its fiscal capabilities through its annual budget process and other revenue measures (e.g., raising taxes, property assessments, bonds).

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 31
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

5.0 HAZARD ASSESSMENT

5.1 OVERVIEW
The purpose of this section is to review, update, and/or validate the hazards identified for the 2022 City of Santa Barbara LHMP. The intent is to confirm and update the description, location and extent, and history of hazards facing the City now and in the future. This assessment also considers the potential exacerbating effects of climate change. The importance of this review is to ensure that decisions and mitigating actions are based on the most up-to-date information available.

Another purpose of this section is to screen the hazards to determine their relative probability and severity to inform the risk posed to various communities and resources. This assessment will provide an understanding of the significance by ranking hazards by their priority in the City.

In 2021, the MAC reviewed and revised 1) the list of hazards by community or geographic area; 2) the information and material presented for each hazard; and 3) the prioritization of the hazards.

The City LPT refined the list of hazards applicable to the City and confirmed the hazard prioritization. The following sections provide the results of this effort.

5.2 HAZARD SCREENING/PRIORITIZATION
The Hazard Assessment presented here reflects the City’s 2022 review and modifications to the updated risk assessment presented in Chapter 5.0, Hazard Assessment, and Chapter 6.0, Vulnerability Assessment of the 2022 MJHMP. Applicable hazard information from the City’s 2017 LHMP was incorporated during the development of this section. A comprehensive treatment of hazards and their descriptions may be found in Chapter 5.0 of the Santa Barbara County 2022 MJHMP.

The potential extent, probability, frequency, and magnitude of future occurrences were all used to identify and prioritize the list of hazards most relevant in the City. The City LPT completed the Plan Update Guide to rank the hazards and identify key hazards to help inform this assessment (Appendix A). As summarized in Table 5-1, the local priority hazards in the City are based on the screening of frequency/probability of occurrence, geographic extent, potential magnitude/severity of the hazard, and overall significance. Local experience, MAC/LPT input, and community feedback also informed the assessment of local priority hazards. After reviewing the localized hazard maps and exposure/loss assessment provided in the 2022 MJHMP, the following hazards were identified by the Santa Barbara LPT as their top priorities (Appendix A). A brief rationale for each hazard is included below. This assessment and description of key hazards in the City are provided in addition to the 2022 MJHMP’s comprehensive assessment of regional hazards that may affect the City.

Table 5-1. City of Santa Barbara Local Priority Hazards Hazard Type and Ranking Score Planning Consideration
Based on Hazard Level
Wildfire 12 Significant
Earthquake 12 Significant

5.0. Hazard Assessment
32 February 2023
Hazard Type and Ranking Score Planning Consideration
Based on Hazard Level
Flood 9 Moderate
Pandemic/Public Health Emergency 9 Moderate
Tsunami 9 Moderate
Drought and Water Shortage 8 Moderate
Energy Shortage and Resiliency 8 Moderate
Dam Failure 8 Moderate
Landslide 7 Moderate
Train Accident 7 Moderate
Aircraft Crash 7 Moderate
Coastal Hazards 6 Moderate
Extreme Heat 6 Moderate
Hazardous Materials Release 6 Moderate
Oil Spill 5 Limited
To continue compliance with the DMA of 2000, the City accepts the County’s natural hazard profiles presented in Chapter 5.0, Hazard Assessment with the following notes and refinements or elaborations provided specifically for the City in subsections below. The City’s LPT acknowledged the following hazards are either not a threat, are highly unlikely within the City limits, or are adequately addressed by the 2022 MJHMP and do not require additional information to be relevant to the City’s hazard setting; therefore, these hazards are not addressed further in the City’s LHMP: severe weather/storm, windstorm, hurricane, tornado, utility failure, natural gas pipeline rupture and storage facilities, hydraulic fracturing and well stimulation, radiological and nuclear accidents, levee failure, cyber threats, agricultural pests and invasive species, terrorism, and civil unrest. These additional hazards are being addressed in the more comprehensive 2022 MJHMP.

5.3 HAZARD PROFILES

5.3.1 Wildfire
Description of Hazard
Wildfires can be classified as either a wildland fire or a wildland-urban interface (WUI) fire. The former involves situations where wildfire occurs in an area that is relatively undeveloped except for the possible existence of basic infrastructure such as roads and power lines. A WUI fire includes situations in which a wildfire enters an area that is developed with structures and other human developments. In WUI fires, the fire is fueled by both naturally occurring vegetation and the urban structural elements themselves. According to the National Fire Plan issued by the U.S. Departments of Agriculture and Interior, the wildland-urban interface is defined as “…the line, area, or zone where structures and other human development meet or intermingle with undeveloped wildland or vegetative fuels.”
The WUI fire can be subdivided into three categories (NWUIFPP, 1998): The classic wildland-urban interface exists where well-defined urban and suburban development presses up against open

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 33
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan expanses of wildland areas. The mixed wildland-urban interface is characterized by isolated homes, subdivisions, and small communities situated predominantly in wildland settings. The occluded wildland-urban interface exists where islands of wildland vegetation occur inside a largely urbanized area. Generally, many of the areas at risk within Santa Barbara County fall into the classic wildland-urban interface category.

Certain conditions must be present for a wildfire hazard to occur; a large source of fuel must be present, the weather must be conducive (generally hot, dry, and windy), and fire suppression sources must not be able to easily suppress and control the fire. The cause of a majority of wildfires is human-induced or lightning; however, once burning, wildfire behavior is based on three primary factors: fuel, topography, and weather. Fuel will affect the potential size and behavior of a wildfire depending on the amount present, its burning qualities (e.g., level of moisture), and its horizontal and vertical continuity. Topography affects the movement of air, and thus the fire, over the ground surface. The terrain can also change the speed at which the fire travels, and the ability of firefighters to reach and extinguish the fire. Weather as manifested in temperature, humidity, and wind (both short and long term) affect the probability, severity, and duration of wildfires.

Location and Extent of Hazard in Santa Barbara
The climate, topography, and vegetation in Santa Barbara County are conducive to wildfires.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire and Resource Assessment Program (CDFFRAP) was mandated to map areas of significant fire hazards based on fuels (vegetation), terrain, weather, and other relevant factors. These zones, referred to as Fire Hazard Severity Zones, define the application of various mitigation strategies to reduce the risk associated with wildland fires. The most current mapping efforts by CDF-FRAP were conducted in 2007. Figure 5-1 below shows the Fire Hazard Severity Zones located in Santa Barbara County.

CDF-FRAP developed data that displays the relative risk to areas of significant population density from wildfire. This data is created by intersecting residential housing unit density with proximate fire threat, to give a relative measure of potential loss of structures and threats to public safety from wildfire. Figure 5-2 of the 2022 MJHMP was generated using this data to show the WUI in Santa Barbara County. The WUI map depicts areas where potential fuels treatments will be prioritized to reduce wildland fire threats.

5.0. Hazard Assessment
34 February 2023
The WUI data shown in Figure 5-2 of the
MJHMP was developed on a statewide
basis and does not consider the placement
of local neighborhoods within the
geography. Santa Barbara City Fire has
created data at a more local level to
convey communities at risk. Due to the
threat, the City developed a ‘Ready, Set,
Go’ guide for residents within the high fire
area. A list containing the federally
regulated (communities that adjoin federal
lands) communities at risk, which includes
the City of Santa Barbara, is provided in
Section 5.3.1 of the MJHMP (see also
Figure 5-3 of the MJHMP).

History of Hazard in Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara County and the City are
prone to wildfires. There are many areas
in which the County and City intersect;
there is a long history of wildfires in the
County that have affected the City (refer
to Figure 5-4 of the MJHMP). Table 5-4 of
the MJHMP lists the major wildfires in
Santa Barbara County since 1932.

The CDF-FRAP compiles fire perimeters of wildfires and has established an ongoing fire perimeter data capture process. Figure 5-4 of the MJHMP shows historic, significant wildfire perimeters in Santa Barbara County. Fire perimeters provide a reasonable view of the spatial distribution of past large fires.

Over the last ten years, Santa Barbara County has experienced 9 major fires. Two of these fires directly threatened the heavily populated Santa Barbara Front Country and areas of the City of Santa Barbara:
• Before even larger fires in recent years, the Thomas Fire in 2017 was the largest California wildfire in modern California history, engulfing more than 280,000 acres, destroying or damaging more than 1,000 structures, primarily within Ventura County, and resulting in two fatalities. The fire was ignited north of Santa Paula in Ventura County and burned into Santa Barbara County through the Santa Ynez Mountains and parts of the upper Santa Ynez River watershed. It was one of the first wildfires to burn from inland Ventura County into the Santa Barbara front country of the Santa Ynez Mountains. The fire was active for 40 days and at one time involved more than 8,500 firefighters, 800 fire engines, and dozens of aircraft (National Interagency Fire Center 2021; Santa Maria Times 2021). The fire burned in the City from December 5 to December 7. Within the City, evacuations were limited to the Riviera and The 2017 Thomas Fire burned approximately 281,893
acres in Ventura and Santa Barbara counties. The fire
was started by power lines coming in contact during high winds and remained active for 40 days. Emergency
personnel from all across the western U.S. responded to the fire The fire resulted in the destruction of 1,063
structures, the loss of one civilian, and one firefighter fatality.

Source: CALFIRE 2021; Ventura County Fire Department
2019. Photo: SB Bucket Brigade

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 35
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Eucalyptus Hill area. No deaths, injuries, property damage, or infrastructure damage occurred within the City boundaries. However, the City experienced economic impacts due to air quality and ash during the height of the holiday shopping season. • The Cave Fire in 2019 burned over 3,000 acres near Painted Cave in the Los Padres National Forest for 21 days (National Interagency Fire Center 2021). Approximately 2,400 homes were placed under mandatory evacuation orders for areas north of Cathedral Oaks Road between Patterson Avenue and Highway 154 and areas of Foothill Road between Highway 154 and North Ontare Road. A unified command consisting of multiple County agencies was assembled to assist with the fire (County Fire Department 2021). No homes were damaged (Santa Maria Times 2021). The fire threatened a small area in the northwestern portion of the City.

Probability of Occurrence
Vegetation and topography were significant elements in the identification of the fire threat zones.

A substantial amount of the vegetation in Santa Barbara is commonly called chaparral, it is a dense and scrubby bush that has evolved to persist in a fire-prone habitat. Chaparral plants will eventually age and die; however, they will not be replaced by new growth until a fire rejuvenates the area. Chamise, manzanita, and ceanothus are all examples of chaparral which are quite common in Santa Barbara County and the foothills above the City. Santa Barbara County was subject to 42 major wildfires over 88 years, resulting in a 48 percent chance of occurrence in any given year.

Climate Change Considerations
Climate change plays a significant role in wildfire hazards. The changing conditions from wet to dry can create more fuel; the increased possibility of high winds increase risk and present a challenge, and drought conditions could hinder the ability to contain fires. Large wildfires also have several indirect effects beyond those of a smaller, local fire. These may include air quality and health issues, road closures, business closures, and other forms of losses. Furthermore, large wildfires increase the threat of other disasters such as landslide/debris flows and flooding (see Section 5.3.3, Flood and Section 5.3.9, Landslide).

5.0. Hazard Assessment
36 February 2023
Figure 5-1. Santa Barbara County Fire Hazard Severity Zones

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 37
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

5.3.2 Earthquake & Liquefaction
Description of Hazard
An earthquake is caused by a release of strain within or along the edge of the Earth's tectonic plates producing ground motion and shaking, surface fault rupture, and secondary hazards, such as ground failure. The severity of the motion increases with the amount of energy released decreases with distance from the causative fault or epicenter and is amplified by soft soils. After just a few seconds, earthquakes can cause massive damage and extensive casualties.

Most people are familiar with the Richter scale, a method of rating earthquakes based on strength using an indirect measure of released energy. The Richter scale is logarithmic. Each one-point increase corresponds to a 10-fold increase in the amplitude of the seismic shock waves and a 32- fold increase in energy released. For example, an earthquake registering 7.0 on the Richter scale releases over 1,000 times more energy than an earthquake registering 5.0.

Table 5-2. Richter Scale
Richter
Magnitudes Earthquake Effects
Less than 3.5 Generally not felt but recorded.

3.5-5.4 Often felt, but rarely causes damage.

Under 6.0 Slight damage to well-designed buildings. Can cause major damage to poorly constructed buildings over small regions.

6.1-6.9 Can be destructive in areas up to about 100 kilometers across residential areas.

7.0-7.9 Can cause serious damage to larger areas.
8 or greater Can cause serious damage in areas several hundred kilometers across.

Peak ground acceleration (PGA) is a measure of the strength of ground shaking. Larger peak ground accelerations result in greater damage to structures. PGA is used to depict the risk of damage from future earthquakes by showing earthquake ground motions that have a specified probability (10%,5%, or 2%) of being exceeded in 50 years return period. These values are often used for reference in construction design, and in assessing relative hazards when making economic and safety decisions.

Liquefaction is the phenomenon that occurs when ground shaking causes loose, saturated soils to lose strength and act as a viscous fluid. Liquefaction causes two types of ground failure: lateral spread and loss of bearing strength. Lateral spreads develop on gentle slopes and entail the sidelong movement of large masses of soil as an underlying layer liquefies. Loss of bearing strength occurs when the soil supporting structures liquefy, causing the structures to settle; resulting in potential damage.

5.0. Hazard Assessment
38 February 2023
Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara As previously mentioned, Santa Barbara County, including the City of Santa Barbara, is located in a high seismic activity zone. The county is located in the Transverse Range geologic province.

The movement of continental plates manifests primarily along the San Andreas Fault system. The San Andreas fault is situated 7 miles northeast of Santa Barbara County; active faults in the San Andreas Fault system that fall within Santa Barbara County include the Nacimiento, Ozena, Suey, and Little Pine faults. Other active faults in the region include the Big Pine, Mesa, Santa Ynez, Graveyard- Turkey Trap, More Ranch, Pacifico, Santa Ynez, and Santa Rose Island faults. The Santa Barbara County Comprehensive Plan Seismic Safety and Safety Element provides descriptions of all faults in Santa Barbara County, including historically active, active, potentially active, and inactive, as well as their location and fault length. A map of faults in the Santa Barbara County region is located below (Figure 5-2).

The City has areas of liquefaction that would cause severe damage in the downtown and lower eastside areas (Figure 5-3). After earthquakes, some regions may be prone to liquefaction. On level ground, liquefaction results in water rising to the ground surface. On sloping ground, liquefaction will usually result in slope failure such as the event at the Sheffield Dam in the aftermath of the 1925 Santa Barbara earthquake. Liquefaction risk is considered high if there are soft soils (Types D or E) present. The National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) rates soils from hard to soft and gives the soils ratings from Type A through Type E. The hardest soils are rated Type A, and the softest soils are rated Type E. The majority of the soils in Santa Barbara County are types A-C, with some areas having type D. There have been no Type E soils identified.

Liquefaction risk is also determined by the depth to groundwater. Most of the low coastal plain and valley bottoms in the City are underlain by alluvium and given a moderate rating with respect to liquefaction potential.

History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
The City of Santa Barbara is located in a high seismic activity zone and as such has a long history of earthquakes. Although most seismic activity in California occurs along the San Andreas Fault system, most historic seismic events in the City of Santa Barbara region have been centered offshore on an east-west trending fault between Santa Barbara and the Channel Islands. While more extensive discussion of previous earthquakes in Santa Barbara County is available in the 2022 MJHMP, the following information provides an overview of the more recent, significant events. Table 5-9 of the MJHMP provides an overview of significant events within the last 50 years. Figure 5-10 of the MJHMP displays historical epicenters of earthquakes located in Santa Barbara County since 1700
• In June of 1925, the City experienced this destructive earthquake that caused property damage estimated at $8 million and killed 13 people. Most of the damage occurred at Santa Barbara and nearby towns along the coast, but the earthquake caused moderate damage at many points north of the Santa Ynez mountains, in the Santa Ynez and Santa Maria River valleys.

North of Santa Barbara, the earth dam of the Sheffield Reservoir was destroyed, but the water released caused little damage. In Santa Barbara, few buildings on State Street escaped damage. Because parts of the main business district and the area near the seashore were built

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 39
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan on land fill, many of the structures there were demolished, and others were so shattered that they had to be razed. In general, however, buildings of reinforced concrete were damaged little, except where workmanship was poor; frame buildings covered with stucco, sheathing, or lath also withstood the shock well. Loss to the sewage system was heavy only in areas of land fill, but the disposal plantwas destroyed above the surface of the ground. • In March of 1978, and continuing sporadically through July of 1978, a swarm of small earthquakes, called micro-earthquakes occurred underneath the northeastern end of the Santa Barbara Channel. Toward the end of the micro-earthquake swarm, in July and early August of 1978, an unusually large amount of oil and tar was reported on local beaches in Santa Barbara. A common occurrence for the Santa Barbara area, the oil from these natural seeps was considered only a minor nuisance. On August 13, 1978, an earthquake occurred just to the southwest of the City of Santa Barbara, about 5 miles beneath the Santa Barbara Channel.

There was minimal damage in the City. Sixty-five people were treated for injuries at local hospitals. No deaths were reported.
• On December 22, 2003, at 11:15 a.m. a magnitude 6.5 earthquake struck the central California coast. The event, known as the San Simeon Earthquake, was located 11 kilometers northeast of San Simeon, and 39 kilometers west/northwest of Paso Robles. Although the San Simeon Earthquake was felt in parts of the City, there was no damage.

Probability of Occurrence
The United States Geological Survey (USGS) and their partners, as part of the latest Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast Version 3 (USGS 2015), have estimated the chances of having large earthquakes throughout California over the next 30 years. Statewide, the rate of earthquakes around magnitude 6.7 (the size of the 1994 Northridge earthquake) has been estimated to be one per 6.3 years (more than 99 percent likelihood in the next 30 years); in southern California, the rate is one per 12 years (93 percent likelihood in the next 30 years). Southern California’s rates are given in Table 5-3.

Table 5-3. Southern California Region Earthquake Likelihoods Magnitude (greater than or equal to) Average Repeat Time (years) 30-year likelihood of one or more events 5 0.24 100%
6 2.3 100%

6.7 12 93%
7 25 75%

7.5 87 36%
8 522 7%
Source: USGS 2015.

Climate Change Considerations
To date, no credible evidence has been provided that links climate to earthquakes; however, climate and weather do play a significant role in the response and recovery from earthquakes. Effects from climate change could create cascading complications and impacts.

5.0. Hazard Assessment
40 February 2023
Figure 5-2. Santa Barbara County Probability of Shaking 2% in 50 Years

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 41
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Figure 5-3. Santa Barbara County Liquefaction Severity

5.0. Hazard Assessment
42 February 2023

5.3.3 Flood
Description of Hazard
A flood is a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation on land that is normally dry. Several factors determine the severity of floods, including rainfall intensity and duration, antecedent moisture conditions, surface permeability, and geographic characteristics of the watershed such as shape and slope. Other causes can include a ruptured dam or levee, rapid ice or snow melting in the mountains, under-engineered infrastructure, or even a poorly placed beaver dam that can overwhelm a river or channel and send water spreading over adjacent land or floodplains.

A large amount of rainfall in a short time can result in flash flood conditions, as can a dam failure or other sudden spill. The National Weather Service’s definition of a flash flood is a flood occurring in a watershed where the time of travel of the peak of flow from one end of the watershed to the other is less than six hours.

Another form of flooding occurs when coastal storms produce large ocean waves that sweep across coastlines making landfall. Storm surges inundate coastal areas, destroy dunes, and cause flooding.

If a storm surge occurs at the same time as high tide, the water height will be even greater. The County historically has been vulnerable to storm surge inundation associated with tropical storms and El Niño.

Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara The geographical location, climate, and topography of Santa Barbara City and County make it prone to flooding (Figure 5-4). In regions such as Santa Barbara, without extended periods of below-freezing temperatures, floods usually occur during the season of highest precipitations or during heavy rainfalls after long dry spells. Additionally, due to the Mediterranean climate and the variability of rainfall, stream flow throughout the County is highly variable and directly impacted by rainfall with little snowmelt or base flow from headwaters. Watercourses can experience a high amount of sedimentation during wet years and high amounts of vegetative growth during dry and moderate years.

The drainages in the southern part of the County are characterized by high intensity, short duration runoff events, due to the relatively short distance from the top of the Santa Ynez Mountains to the Pacific Ocean. Runoff from high intensity, short-duration storm events can cause inundation of over bank areas, debris including sediment, rock, downed trees in the water that can plug culverts and bridges, erosion and sloughing of banks, and loss of channel capacity due to sedimentation.

The City is traversed by the floodplains of creeks that drain the Santa Ynez Mountains, with the degree of flood hazard varying substantially by community and creek. Mission Creek has been channelized reducing but not eliminating flood hazards. Flood control debris basins have been constructed on many of these creeks to intercept sediment and debris, reducing the potential for plugging of downstream creek channels and associated flood hazards.

Another contributing factor to flooding is the City’s location along the Pacific Ocean. With its six miles of coastline, the City is susceptible to storm surge events following storms off the coast. In particular, low-lying areas, including much of the City’s waterfront, are subject to wave attacks,

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 43
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan coastal flooding, and storm surges. Additionally, portions of the City’s are subject to flooding due to flash flooding, urban flooding, watershed channel overflow, and downstream flooding (see Section 5.3.12, Coastal Hazards).

History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
Flooding has been a major problem in the City of Santa Barbara. The City has several watershed areas that have different types of flooding problems, including over bank riverine flooding, flash floods, tidal flooding/tsunamis, and dam failure. The most common flooding in the City is due to watershed channel flooding and flash flood events.

Between 1906 and 2018, Santa Barbara County experienced 22 significant inland flood events.

Eight of these floods received Presidential Disaster Declarations. Section 5.3.4 of the MJHMP describes the floods, including information concerning the nature of the flooding and the extent of the damages.

While there is a detailed account of historical flood events in Santa Barbara County provided in Section 5.0 of the 2022 MJHMP, the following section provides a summary of the more recent significant flood events that affected the City:
• 1998 – The flooding events of 1998 arrived on a strong El Niño and brought several recordbreaking rainfalls with 50-year storm event intensities throughout February. The City of Santa Barbara recorded its wettest month in history, 21.36-inches of rainfall. By the end of the month, many areas in the county had received 600 percent of normal February rainfall. Flood-related damages within Santa Barbara occurred during three major storm periods: February 1-4, February 6-9, and February 22-24. The cost to repair extensive flood damage to public and private property was estimated at $15 million. Just like in 1995, transportation throughout the county was disrupted through closures of roads, the Santa Barbara Airport, and train service.

Flood damage was spread throughout the county and the county was declared a Federal Disaster Area on February 9. The floods received a Presidential Disaster Declaration (County Flood Control 1998).
• February 2, 1998 – During the first storm on February 2, winds with gusts as high as 63 miles per hour (mph) knocked over hundreds of trees and caused loss of power to thousands of homes across Goleta and Santa Barbara. The next day, 15-foot-high waves damaged pilings under Stearns Wharf and a broken sewer line near Arroyo Burro Beach, closing several nearby beaches due to high levels of bacteria buildup. Gaviota Creek overtopped and flooded the State Beach at the mouth of the creek. At the Gaviota Chevron plant, storm related damage caused a release of hazardous materials. The airport also closed down due to flood, and Highway 101 was shut down in Ventura, cutting off the City to the south (County Flood Control 1998).
• February 6, 1998 – With little time to recuperate, the South Coast was hit by a second major storm on February 6. Disruptions of transportation were widespread throughout the South Coast – a downed tree resulted in an accident that closed Highway 101. Along the coast, berms were hastily constructed to protect beachfront property (County Flood Control 1998).

5.0. Hazard Assessment
44 February 2023
• 2018 – Following the October 2017 Thomas Fire, heavy rains unleashed destructive rivers of water, mud, and debris in Santa Barbara County, particularly Montecito, leaving at least 23 people dead, destroying over 100 homes, and damaging over 300 homes. Rain from the storm fell on hillsides and mountains stripped of trees and vegetation by the Thomas Fire. The National Weather Service, Los Angeles reported that 0.54 inches of rain had fallen in 5 minutes at Montecito. Other figures include 0.73 inches in 10 minutes at KTYD Radio Towers, 0.86 inches in 15 minutes at Carpinteria, 1.11 inches in 30 minutes at Carpinteria, and 1.45 inches in 1 hour at Matilija Canyon (FloodList 2021) (see also, Section 5.3.9, Landslide).

Probability of Occurrence
The 100-year flood is a flood that has a one percent chance in any given year of being equaled or exceeded. The 500-year flood is the flood that has a 0.2 percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year.

Climate Change Consideration
Climate change is projected to amplify existing flood hazards through increased frequency and strength of El Niño events and rainfall intensity. Extreme weather events have become more frequent over the past 40 to 50 years and this trend is projected to continue. Up to half of California’s precipitation comes from a relatively small number of intense winter storms, which are expected to become more intense with climate change. For example, what is currently a 200-year storm, or one that has a 1 in 200 chance of occurring in a given year, by 2100 would increase in frequency by 40 to 50 years (to a 1 in 150/160 chance in a given year). This means that the 100-year and 500-year floodplains may expand, and the current floodplains may become 40- to 50-year floodplains (Santa County Barbara Planning and Development Department 2021). The frequency and intensity of heavy rainstorms are projected to increase, causing fluvial flooding along the City’s creeks, although overall annual precipitation levels are expected to increase only slightly. For discussion regarding the impacts of climate change on coastal flooding and sea level rise, see Section 5.3.12, Coastal Hazards.

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 45
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Figure 5-4. Santa Barbara County FEMA Flood Hazards

5.0. Hazard Assessment
46 February 2023

5.3.4 Pandemic/Public Health Emergency
Description of Hazard
Infectious disease emergencies are circumstances caused by biological agents, including organisms such as bacteria, viruses, or toxins, with the potential for significant illness or death in the population.

Infectious disease emergencies may be caused by:
• Naturally occurring diseases spread from person to person (e.g., measles, mumps,meningococcal disease, tuberculosis)
• Foodborne (e.g.: salmonella, E. coli, botulinum toxin, etc.) • Vectors such as mosquitos can spread diseases (e.g.: West Nile virus, dengue, Zika,malaria). • Newly emerging infectious diseases (e.g.: Ebola, Zika, SARS, MERS, avian influenza). • Intentionally caused the spread of disease or toxins known as bioterrorism. Past bioterrorism events include the contamination of restaurant food with E. coli in Oregon (1984) andthe release of Sarin gas in the Tokyo subway (1995).

The impact of infectious disease emergencies on the local community and its critical infrastructure will depend on:
• The type of biological agent and availability of treatment for victims • The availability of prophylaxis for responders and the public • The scale of exposure and ongoing exposure
• The mode of transmission and whether transmission can be interrupted • Whether the event is affecting staffing for critical infrastructure within and outside ofthe county such as transportation, law enforcement, health care, and the medical and food supply chains.

An outbreak is when there are more cases than would be normally expected, often suddenly, of an infectious disease in a community or facility.

An epidemic is when there are more cases than would be normally expected of infectious disease, often suddenly, in a population of a large geographic area.

A pandemic refers to an epidemic that has spread over several countries or continents, usually affecting a large number of people. Examples include pandemic influenza and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome or “SARS” and the Coronavirus (COVID-19).

Outbreaks, epidemics, or pandemics can occur when a new virus emerges to which the population has little immunity. The 20th century saw three such pandemics, the most notable of which was the 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic that was responsible for 20 million deaths throughout the world.

Secondary impacts include significant economic disruption to a community’s infrastructure due to loss of employee work time, essential services and products, and costs of treating or preventing the spread of the disease.

Public health measures are used to control outbreaks, epidemics, or pandemics of infectious diseases, and are especially important for diseases with high morbidity or mortality and limited medical prophylaxis and/or rapid treatment.

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 47
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Measures to control disease include:
• Legal measures such as isolation and quarantine of persons or products, and legal closure of food establishments.
• Control of contaminated food or water through recall of product or, for water, “Do Not Use”, “Do Not Drink” or “Boil Water” orders issued by state or local health departments.

Vector control to eliminate vectors such as mosquitos that carry the disease from person to person. The Vector-Borne Disease Section of the California Department of Public Health identifies the following types of diseases:
• Africanized Honeybees • Bed Bugs • Body Lice
• Cat Scratch Disease • Conenose Bugs • Hantavirus Cardiopulmonary Syndrome • Head lice • Lyme Disease • Mosquitoes
• Murine Typhus • Plague • Ticks
• West Nile Virus • Red Imported Fire Ants • Scabies
• Swimmer’s Itch • Tularemia • Zika Virus
Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara Public health emergencies, such as infectious disease hazards or epidemics, occur not only on a local or state level but on a national and global scale. It is likely that most communities in the county, including the City, would be affected, either directly or by secondary impacts. Some indirect consequences may be the diversion of resources that may be otherwise available given the limited regional transportation opportunities and flow of goods and materials to the City.

History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
Outbreaks, epidemics, or pandemics can occur when a new virus emerges to which the population has little immunity.

The 20th century saw several outbreaks, pandemics, and epidemics, the most notable of which was the 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic that was responsible for 40 to 50 million deaths throughout the world. The most notable pandemic of the 21st century is the current COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted the economic, political, social, and environmental conditions of the City, county, California, the U.S., and the world. Older adults and people who have severe underlying medical conditions like heart or lung disease or diabetes seem to be at higher risk for developing more serious complications from COVID-19 illness; however, numerous stories were reported of young and healthy people who developed the disease and had serious complications. People with COVID-19 have had a wide range of symptoms reported – ranging from mild symptoms to severe illness. Symptoms of COVID-19 include but are not limited to fever or chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea, or vomiting, and diarrhea.

Symptoms may appear 2-14 days after exposure to the virus. Anyone can have mild to severe

5.0. Hazard Assessment
48 February 2023
symptoms (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] 2021). On January 26, 2020, the CDC confirmed the first COVID-19 case in California, the third case in the U.S. As of June 2, 2021, there have been 34,507 confirmed COVID-19 cases within the county and 451 deaths (Santa Barbara County Public Health Department 2021a). In the City of Santa Barbara, there have been 15,065 reported cases and 112 reported deaths related to COVID-19. As of October 2021, 58 percent of Santa Barbara County was fully vaccinated (Santa Barbara County Public Health Department 2021). In the City of Santa Barbara, the County Public Health Department distributes COVID-19 vaccines at the Franklin Health Care Center and numerous participating pharmacies distribute vaccinations as well.

Probability of Occurrence
Disease outbreaks and flu epidemics occur on an ongoing basis. Occasionally these outbreaks require the initiation of the Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Infectious Disease Response Plan but have required little to no support from the City Emergency Operations Center (EOC). There is a continued threat from a novel influenza virus or other emerging epidemic or pandemic disease that would require a disaster response at the EOC level. The disease could affect the City infrastructure, and the ability of the EOC and other city departments to respond due to disease-related loss of staff.

Climate Change Consideration
It is widely accepted that the effects of climate change will facilitate increases in the frequency of infectious diseases. According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Services, many vector-borne and zoonotic diseases are climate-sensitive and ecological shifts associated with climate change are expected to impact the distribution and incidences of these diseases (National Institute of Environmental Health Services 2018). While many vector-borne and zoonotic diseases, such as malaria, yellow fever, dengue, and murine typhus, are rarely seen in the U.S., the City is directly susceptible to vector-borne and zoonotic diseases that are found in warmer climates and vulnerable due to global trade and travel. Changes in temperature and precipitation directly affect vector-borne disease transmission through pathogen-host interaction, and indirectly through ecosystem changes and species composition. As temperatures increases, vectors can spread into new areas that were previously too cold. During warm weather, animal species that carry diseases typically become more active and insects and other pests reproduce more rapidly. As climate change causes warmer temperatures earlier in the spring and later in the autumn, these animals may be active for longer periods, increasing the time that diseases can be transmitted (National Institute of Environmental Health Services 2018).

Further, climate-related natural disasters (e.g., wildfire, drought and water shortage, flood, coastal hazards) also increase the risk of infectious disease by disrupting health services and infrastructures and damaging water and sanitation networks (World Health Organization 2018).

5.3.5 Tsunami
Description of Hazard
A tsunami is a series of long waves generated in the ocean by a sudden displacement of a large volume of water. Underwater earthquakes, landslides, volcanic eruptions, meteoric impacts, or

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 49
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan onshore slope failures cause this displacement. Tsunami waves travel at speeds averaging 450 to 600 miles per hour. As a tsunami nears the coastline, its speed diminishes, its wavelength decreases, and its height increases. Depending on the type of event that creates the tsunami, as well the remoteness of the event, the tsunami could reach land within a few minutes or after several hours.

Low-lying areas could experience severe inland inundation of water and deposition of debris more than 3,000 feet inland.

Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara As described in Section 5.3.9 of the MJHMP, areas prone to tsunami hazards in the county are limited to coastal areas and offshore areas. The cities of Santa Barbara and Carpinteria are most susceptible to tsunami hazards, given that they are located on or near several offshore geological faults, the more prominent faults being the Mesa Fault, the Santa Ynez Fault in the mountains, and the Santa Rosa Fault (refer to Section 5.3.3 of the MJHMP). Other unnamed faults in the offshore area of the Channel Islands may present tsunami hazards. These faults have been active in the past and can subject the entire county coastal area to seismic action at any time.

History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
The relative threat for local tsunamis in Santa Barbara can be considered low due to low recurrence frequencies. Thirteen possible tsunamis have been observed or recorded in the county from local earthquakes between 1812 and 1988; however, there have been no recorded locally generated tsunamis since 1988. Additionally, these tsunami events were poorly documented, and the precise extent of environmental and public impacts is uncertain (refer to Section 5.3.9 of the MJHMP). The size of these tsunamis may never be known with certainty, but there are unconfirmed estimates of 30-35 feet waves in Santa Barbara City. The estimates are found in various literature and based on anecdotal history only.
• On February 27, 2010, a magnitude 8.8 earthquake occurred along the central coast of Chile and produced a tsunami. For the coast of Southern California, it was one of the largest tsunami episodes since 1964. In general, tsunami waves between 2 and 4 feet were reported. Tsunami waves of around 3 feet were reported by tide gauges across the Santa Barbara Channel. At Santa Barbara Pier, significant beach erosion was reported along with displacement of buoys.

The tsunami surge lasted more than 20 hours. The most significant damage occurred along the coasts of Ventura and southern Santa Barbara counties. Numerous reports of dock damage were reported along with beach erosion.
• On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake occurred off the Pacific coast of Tohoku, Japan. This earthquake devastated many communities in Japan and caused tsunami effects across the ocean in Santa Barbara City. The only significant impact to Santa Barbara City was to the dredging contractor for the City of Santa Barbara harbor. The City harbor operations documented approximately $1,500 of damages (Public Assistance).

Probability of Occurrence
The University of Southern California (USC) Tsunami Research Group has modeled areas in the county that could potentially be inundated in the event of a tsunami. In 2001, the Tsunami Research Group concluded the walls of the basin that form the Santa Barbara Channel are susceptible to

5.0. Hazard Assessment
50 February 2023
submarine slope failures in at least two mapped locations (USC 2001). This model is based on potential earthquake sources and hypothetical extreme undersea, near-shore landslide sources. The data was mapped by the California Geological Survey and Cal OES for Tsunami Evacuation Planning. The maps and data are compiled with the best currently available scientific information and represent areas that could be exposed to tsunami hazards during a tsunami event. The tsunami inundation map helps to assist cities and counties in identifying their tsunami hazard areas. Figure 5-5 shows tsunami hazard areas in the City.

Based on the tsunami inundation map (Figure 5-5), several areas along the City’s coast have the potential to be inundated by a tsunami. Given, there is a medium probability of an earthquake, which would result in high impacts including potential tsunami events in the City, the City is at minor risk of future tsunami events.

Climate Change Consideration
As previously described, tsunamis are created by earthquakes or other earth movements. To date, no direct relationship has been made between climate change and the occurrences of earthquakes or other earth movements.

5.3.6 Drought and Water Shortage
Description of Hazard
Drought and water shortages are a gradual phenomenon and generally are not signified by one or two dry years. California’s and Santa Barbara’s extensive system of water supply infrastructure (reservoirs, groundwater basins, and interregional conveyance facilities) generally mitigates the effects of short‐term dry periods for most water users. However, drought conditions are present when a region receives below-average precipitation, resulting in prolonged shortages in its water supply, whether atmospheric, surface, or ground water. A drought can last for months or years or may be declared after as few as 15 days.

Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara The entire county is subject to drought conditions and water shortages.

History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
Three 20th century droughts were of particular importance from a water supply standpoint—the droughts of 1929–1934, 1976–1977, and 1987–1992. More recent multiyear droughts occurred in 2007–2009 and 2012–2017 (DWR 2021). California’s most recent multi-year drought occurred from 2012-2017. In January 2014, Santa Barbara County joined the State of California in declaring a local drought emergency, which was the first local emergency declaration of drought in the county’s history (County of Santa Barbara 2014). This was the first time the state-imposed mandatory urban water use reduction requirements on water suppliers, and all of California’s 58 counties declared local emergencies. Refer to Section 5.3.2 of the MJHMP for a detailed discussion of multi-year droughts that were identified as having significant impacts on the county.

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 51
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Figure 5-5. South Coast Tsunami Hazard Area

5.0. Hazard Assessment
52 February 2023
Since August 2020, the period between 2012 and 2016 was one of the documented driest consecutive water years in the county with 50.83 inches in cumulative rainfall (County of Santa Barbara 2021a). Effects of the drought have lowered water storage at Lake Cachuma, one of the county’s largest surface water reservoirs, with water storage at 48.4 percent of capacity in late 2021 (County Flood Control District 2021). Although the statewide drought of 2012–2016 was ended by a wet Water Year in 2017, localized drought conditions persisted in the Central Coast region and were not ended until a wet Water Year in 2019 (DWR 2021).

Probability of Occurrence
Droughts are a regularly recurring feature of Santa Barbara County weather that can be affected by overall regional or worldwide climactic patterns. El Niño and La Niña events are natural climate patterns over the Pacific Ocean often with global effects, with influence over the weather of the U.S. southwest that on average occur every two to seven years. The state recently experienced the 5-year significant drought event of 2012-2017; other notable historical droughts included 2007- 09, 1987-92, 1976-77, and off-and-on dry conditions spanning more than a decade in the 1920s and 1930s. In any given year, the City can be subject to drought conditions and water shortages.

However, out of the last 10 years, the county has been under a locally declared drought emergency for five years; therefore, it is likely drought and associated water shortages will continue and may increase due to climate change considerations, as described further below.

Climate Change Considerations
Climate change has the potential to make drought events more common in the county and City.

Extreme heat creates conditions more conducive for the evaporation of moisture from the ground, thereby increasing the possibility of drought. A warming planet could lead to earlier melting of winter snowpacks, leaving lower stream flows and drier conditions in the late spring and summer.

Snowpacks are important in terms of providing water storage and ensuring adequate supply in the summer when water is most needed. Changing precipitation distribution and intensity have the potential to cause more of the precipitation that does fall to run-off rather than be stored. The result of these processes is an increased potential for more frequent and more severe periods of drought.

5.3.7 Energy Shortage and Resiliency
Description of Hazard
Energy shortages (or disruptions) are considered a form of lifeline system failure. Disruptions can be the consequence of another hazard or can be a primary hazard, absent of an outside trigger.

A failure could involve one, or a combination of the potable water system, power system, natural gas system, wastewater system, communication system, or transportation system. Most power blackouts are not human-caused. They are the result of situations involving unintended events, such as an overwhelming need for power due to weather conditions, equipment failure, or accidents.

They may also fail due to natural hazards such as earthquakes, floods, and landslides. These outages can last anywhere from a few minutes to several weeks.

Santa Barbara County has two service providers. Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) provides electricity in the northern part of the county, with the termination of services north of the Gaviota area. Southern California Edison (SCE) provides power to the Southern parts of the county, with the

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 53
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan termination of services in Gaviota. The two systems are not connected. Thus, if there is a major interruption of service in the Santa Barbara area, then all services could be denied in either direction. The City of Santa Barbara is served by SCE.

Due to recent massive wildfires throughout California and their ignition originating from utility infrastructure and high winds, the electric utilities have initiated a program to conduct Public Safety Power Shutdowns to prevent wildfire ignitions. The utilities are currently working with the County to minimize power delivery interruption while managing wildfire hazards.

Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara The entire county, which includes the City of Santa Barbara, is subject to energy shortages. Electricity service is also highly vulnerable because it is highly dependent on electrical transmission lines and substations functioning properly.

History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
Energy disruptions on a small scale have occurred regularly in Santa Barbara City; especially during strong wind and storm events. One of the largest events affecting electric and natural gas services in the City in recent years was the 2017 Thomas Fire, during which the transmission system running from Ventura County to the City of Goleta was shut down, leaving more than 85,000 customers without power for an extended period during the emergency (SCE 2017). Similar service disruptions, though not quite as extensive, occur in areas affected by wildfires and other disasters or emergencies. Small-scale energy disruptions have occurred regularly in the City.

Probability of Occurrence
In any given year, the City can be subject to energy shortages. A large disruption due to a power failure or rotating brown out is highly likely during strong storm events or during times of extreme heat.

Climate Change Considerations
With increased changes in weather and climate, the energy demands will shift too. The increased prevalence of extreme heat can drive energy demand and increase the need for intentional, unscheduled power shutoffs. Further, the resiliency of power systems can be threatened during a wildfire. As wildfire occurrences associated with climate change increase so does the risk for utility failure. Energy demand and management are critical during disaster response.

5.3.8 Dam Failure
Description of Hazard
Dams fail due to old age, poor design, structural damage, improper siting, landslides flowing into a reservoir, or terrorist actions. Structural damage is often a result of a flood, erosion, or earthquake. A catastrophic dam failure could inundate the area downstream. The force of the water is large enough to carry boulders, trees, automobiles, and even houses along a destructive path downstream. The potential for casualties, environmental damage, and economic loss is great.

Damage to electric generating facilities and transmission lines could impact life support systems in communities outside the immediate hazard area.

5.0. Hazard Assessment
54 February 2023
Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara There are two dams in the county (i.e., Gibraltar Dam and Lauro Dam), which, if resulted in dam failure, would impact the City. These dams range in purpose from water supply to flood control.

Gibraltar Dam is owned and operated by the City of Santa Barbara. Gibraltar Dam and reservoir are located on the Santa Ynez River in Santa Barbara County, about 9 miles north of the City and upstream from Lake Cachuma. The City owns and operates the dam and reservoir under a Notice of Appropriation posted on October 11, 1904. Stored water is diverted through Mission Tunnel to the Cater Water Treatment Plant. The dam is a constant radius, concrete arch dam constructed in 1920 with an original capacity of 14,500 acre-feet; it was raised to its current elevation in 1949 and strengthened in 1991. Gibraltar Reservoir is the source of about one-third of the City of Santa Barbara’s water supply. Loss of storage capacity due to siltation has been an issue since the dam was constructed. To monitor changes in capacity, and under the requirements of the Upper Santa Ynez River Operations Agreement, the City commissions a bathymetric survey of Gibraltar Reservoir at approximately three-year intervals.

Lauro Dam, which is owned and operated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, is an earthen fill structure located on Diablo Creek at the northern edge of the City. The dam has a crest length of 540 feet and a height of 137 feet. The reservoir has a capacity of 640 acre-feet.

History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
As described in Section 5.6.3 of the 2022 MJHMP, the county has experienced one incident of catastrophic dam failure, which occurred in the community of Mission Canyon. No historical dam failures have occurred within or in the vicinity of the City.

The DWR Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) provides oversight of the design, construction, and maintenance of jurisdictional-sized and non-Federal dams. With DWR DSOD oversight, many potential dam issues have been addressed and/or resolved in the county (DWR DSOD 2021).

Additionally, the USBR, responsible for oversight of federal dams in the county, has improved systems to ensure that peak releases during heavy inflows do not result in excessive downstream flows, which reduces the possibility of inundation from overflows (Santa Barbara County Planning and Development Department 2015).

Probability of Occurrence
Dam failure events are infrequent and usually coincide with the events that cause them, such as earthquakes, landslides, excessive rainfall, and snowmelt. There is a “residual risk” associated with dams; residual risk is the risk that remains after safeguards have been implemented. For dams, the residual risk is associated with events beyond those that the facility was designed to withstand.

However, the probability of occurrence of any type of dam failure event is considered to be low in today’s regulatory and dam safety oversight environment.

Climate Change Considerations
The potential for climate change to affect the likelihood of dam failure is not fully understood at this point. There is potential for increased precipitation events as a result of climate change conditions to present a future increased risk of dam failure if large inflows to reservoirs occur.

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 55
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan However, this could be offset by generally lower reservoir levels if storage water resources become more limited or stretched in the future due to climate change, drought, and/or population growth.

5.3.9 Landslide
Description of Hazard
Landslides can be defined as the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down an incline.

Types of landslides include rock falls, rockslides, deep slope failures, shallow debris flows, and mudflows.
• Slope failure occurs when there is erosion of slopes by surface-water runoff. The intensity of slope wash is dependent on the discharge and velocity of surface runoff and the resistance of surface materials to erosion.
• Mudflows are defined as flows or rivers of liquid mud down a hillside on the surface of normally dry land. They occur when water saturates the ground, usually following long and heavy rainfalls. Mud forms and flows downslope if there is no ground cover such as brush or trees to hold the soil in place.
• Debris flow occurs when water begins to wash material from a slope or when water sheets off of a newly burned stretch of land. Chaparral land is especially susceptible todebris flows after a fire. The flow will pick up speed and debris as it descends the slope. As the system gradually picks up speed it takes on the characteristics of a basic river system, carrying everything in its path along with it.

The most common cause of a landslide is an increase in the downslope gravitational stress applied to slope materials, also known as over-steepening. Over-steepening can be caused by natural processes or by man-made activities. Undercutting of a valley wall by stream erosion or a sea cliff by wave erosion are ways in which over-steeping may occur naturally.

Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara Landslides and landslide-prone sedimentary formations are present throughout the coastal plain of western Santa Barbara County. Figure 5-18 of the MJHMP shows the location of soil types throughout the county. Generally, areas with soft soils are more prone to movement. Landslides also occur in the granitic mountains of East Santa Barbara County, although they are less prevalent.

Many of these landslides are thought to have occurred under much wetter climatic conditions than at present. Recent landslides are those with fresh or sharp geomorphic expressions suggestive of active (ongoing) movement or movement within the past several decades. Reactivations of existing landslides can be triggered by disturbances such as heavy rainfall, seismic shaking, and/or grading.

Many recent landslides are thought to be reactivations of ancient landslides.

Section 5.3.7 of the MJHMP lists the areas in Santa Barbara County where there are geologic formations that can lead to fairly severe landslides as identified by the Santa Barbara County Comprehensive Plan Seismic Safety and Safety Element (Santa Barbara County Planning and Development Department 2015). Some areas of the City are prone to more frequent rain-induced landslides, resulting in disruption to transportation and damage to roadways.

5.0. Hazard Assessment
56 February 2023
Figure 5-13 of the MJHMP shows the debris flow hazard areas along the South Coast as of 2018, after the Thomas Fire. As shown therein, only a small area of the northeastern portion of the City is susceptible to mudflow and debris flow hazards. However, this hazard area may shift after a debris flow or landslide or other hazards have affected an area, such as wildfire, flooding, or drought (Santa Barbara County Department of Planning and Development 2021).

History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
As previously mentioned, Santa Barbara County is prone to landslides; however, many previous landslide occurrences within the county were smaller and are not well documented. The Riviera area of the City has two area of landsliding referred to as the “Conejo Road Landslide” and the “Canon View Road/Sycamore Canyon Landslide”. Movement of slopes in these areas were triggered in response to heavy rains in 1982-83 and again in 2005, destroying eight homes. Several large landslides have affected the coastal bluffs in the past, including the El Camino de la Luz landslide in 1978, which encompassed approximately three acres and destroyed two homes; and the bluff in Shoreline Park in 2008, which moved portions of the bluff edge landward 38 feet. Additionally, several historic storm and flood events in the county, particularly storms following intense wildfires, resulted in mudflows and debris flows. The most recent instance of debris flow affecting the City is the 2018 Montecito Debris Flows.

Following the 2017 Thomas Fire, which burned approximately 281,893 acres in Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties, a reported 0.59 inches of rain fell within 30 minutes in the burn scars from the Thomas Fire in the foothills of Montecito on Tuesday, January 9, 2018. Four inches of rain fell in two days, causing massive debris flows and flooding that damaged or destroyed 400 homes, killed 23 residents, and led to the closure of Highway 101 and the UPRR for more than 3 weeks, cutting off the county from communities to the south. California Geological Survey scientists estimated the Montecito debris flow as having speeds of 10-15 mph, being up to 25-30 feet deep, and capable of carrying boulders as large as a tow truck. (California Geological Survey 2019b).

Probability of Occurrence
Figure 5-6 below shows the locations of deep-seated landslide susceptibility in the county as mapped by the California Geological Survey. This map shows the relative likelihood of deep landslide based on the three site factors that most determine susceptibility: prior failure (from a landslide inventory), regional estimates of rock or soil strength, and steepness of slopes. On the most basic level, weak rocks and steep slopes are more likely to generate landslides. The map uses detailed information on the location of past landslides, the location and relative strength of rock units, and the steepness of the slope in a methodology developed by Wilson and Keefer (1985).

The result shows the distribution of one very important component of landslide hazard. It is intended to provide infrastructure owners, emergency planners, and the public with a general overview of where landslides are more likely. The map does not include information on landslide triggering events, such as rainstorms or earthquake shaking, nor does it address susceptibility to shallow landslides such as debris flows. Therefore, this map is not appropriate for the evaluation of landslide potential at any specific site (California Geological Survey 2019). The areas shaded in darker red in Figure 5-6 are considered to have a higher probability of landslide occurrence than the low landslide risk areas in the City.

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 57
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Figure 5-6. Landslide Susceptibility in Santa Barbara County

5.0. Hazard Assessment
58 February 2023
Based on historical data and given the likelihood of wildfires and intense rainfall events, as well as steep slopes upstream of the City, mudflow and debris flow hazards are likely to occur following wildfire and subsequent rain events. Mudflows and debris flows are usually a cascading effect of severe weather. The probability for more severe and damaging landslides increases during El Niño years or severe winter storms. The potential for debris flows dramatically increases following a wildfire (see also Section 5.3.1, Wildfire).

Climate Change Consideration
A 2021 study by the USGS finds that Southern California is likely to see increased post-wildfire landslides and debris flows caused by climate change-induced shifts in the state’s wet and dry seasons. Wildfires make the landscape more susceptible to landslides when rainstorms pass through as the water liquefies unstable, dry soil and burned vegetation. Geologists routinely conduct landslide hazard assessments after wildfires occur, but there is often not enough time between a fire and a rainstorm to implement an effective emergency response plan (USGS 2021). Wildfire frequency, higher temperatures, and increased droughts projected to occur under climate change can reduce soil absorption capacity and kill vegetation that holds soil in place, making it unable to absorb as much water, further destabilizing slopes. The results also suggest more intense rainfall events could make landslides much more frequent. Slope failure is expected to become more frequent as more precipitation falls during fewer storm events (refer also to Section 5.3.3, Flood).

Also, the increased heavy precipitation events may cause instability in areas where landslides were not as likely before. Therefore, resulting landslides may be larger or more widespread.

5.3.10 Train Accident
Description of Hazard
Train accidents are defined as any accidents involving public or private trains carrying passengers or cargo along the rail corridor. Train accidents, like other transportation accidents, are less likely to lead to a state or federal disaster declaration, than other hazards previously and aforementioned.

Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara The UPRR carries both freight and passengers through the coastal areas. The county is served by two Amtrak train routes for passenger-only services along the UPRR: the Pacific Surfliner and Coast Starlight (Santa Barbara 2021). The Pacific Surfliner runs adjacent to Highway 101 and the coastline with stops in San Diego, Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura counties (Santa Barbara 2021). The Coast Starlight connections Seattle and Los Angeles travel south from Seattle with stops in Portland, the San Francisco Bay Area, Sacramento, Paso Robles, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Barbara.

In addition to passenger-only rail services, the Santa Barbara train station receives train movements from the shipment of commodities, such as hazardous materials, fuel (including oil), agriculture, meats, and non-consumables. Train accidents are generally localized and the incidents result in limited impacts at the community level. However, if there are volatile or flammable substances on the train and the train is in a highly populated, death, injuries, and damage to homes, infrastructure, and the environment, including forest fires, can occur. Additionally, a hazardous materials incident

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 59
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan on the rails or roadway has the potential to shut down both rail and highway transportation routes, such as Highway 101, where the two are within proximity to one another.

History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
No major train accidents have occurred in the City of Santa Barbara or Santa Barbara County.

However, in the last thirty years, numerous train accidents have occurred throughout the southern California region. For example, in 1991 the Seacliff Incident occurred in Ventura County when a train released 440 gallons of aqueous hydrazine (used to make agricultural, metal, and plastics processing chemicals) and naphthalene (industrial solvent) (Los Angeles Times 1991). The accident required the evacuation of the nearby Seacliff Community along with the shutting down of Highway 101 and took 5 days to clean up.

Probability of Occurrence
Given that no known train accidents have occurred in the City or county, the probability of occurrence is low. While neither of the train accidents described above occurred within the county, due to the scale and scope of train transportation for people and commodities, such events have the potential to occur.

Climate Change Consideration
There is no known linkage between climate change and train accidents; however, because of railroad track proximity along the Pacific Ocean, sea level rise could impact service. It is expected that conditions would be gradual and would not create unforeseen problems or complications.

5.3.11 Aircraft Crash
Description of Hazard
Airline crashes are defined as an accident of private, commercial, or military aircraft on land or oversea. Airline crashes, like other transportation accidents, are less likely to lead to a state or federal disaster declaration, than other hazards previously and aforementioned.

Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara In addition to being within the flight pattern of many airports providing regional flights (i.e., Los Angeles International, San Francisco International, Oakland, San Jose International, Burbank Airport, John Wayne Airport, Long Beach Airport, Ontario International Airport), Santa Barbara has one general aviation airport
The Santa Barbara Airport (SBA) is located near Goleta, west of Santa Barbara. SBA encompasses 952 acres and services five major airlines with 12 non-stop destinations. SBA served nearly 786,0000 passengers in 2018 and is the 13th largest airport in California (Santa Barbara Airport 2021). SBA has approximately 32 daily non-stop flights including to Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Oakland, Phoenix, Portland, Sacramento, Salt Lake City, San Francisco, and Seattle.

History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
Currently, in the City of Santa Barbara, there has not been a record of a large aircraft incident.

5.0. Hazard Assessment
60 February 2023
Probability of Occurrence
Given that no known aircraft crashes have occurred in the county or the City, the probability of occurrence is low. However, with the number of general aviation operations, military flights, and its position between Los Angeles/San Diego and the Bay Area, there is a possibility of Santa Barbara County experiencing an airline crash.

Climate Change Consideration
There is no known linkage between climate change and airline crashes. Although bad weather does play a factor in some airline crashes, current aviation technology, and safety standards greatly reduce the risk of potential public and environmental safety concerns, including from weather.

5.3.12 Coastal Hazards
Description of Hazard
Erosion is a natural process that alters existing geomorphic features. Erosion can occur due to several factors, including winter storms, tidal action, wind‐generated high surf, wave action, and rising sea levels.

Coastal storms produce large ocean waves that sweep across low-lying coastlines making landfall.

Storm surges can inundate coastal areas, destroy dunes, and cause flooding. If a storm surge occurs at the same time as high tide, the water height will be even greater. Historically, the county has also been vulnerable to storm surge inundation associated with El Niño events and a related increase in storm severity.

Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara The impacts from sea level rise and erosion in the City will be felt along its six-mile-long coastline.

Much of the westerly portion of the City’s coastal zone is situated on bluffs overlooking the beach.

Bluff areas in the City include the area from approximately Sea Ledge Lane at the west end of the City of Santa Barbara to approximately Santa Barbara Point, as well the far easterly portion of the City by the Bellosguardo Estate. Only a few small portions of the bluff area along the City’s shoreline are currently protected by shoreline protection devices. Shoreline protection devices, such as seawalls and rock revetments, are structures along the coast that can provide flood and erosion protection for properties but can result in accelerated erosion of sandy beach areas in front of (seaward) and adjacent to the devices. These bluffs are currently eroding with exposure to waves and as a result of upland erosion and geologic hazards such as landslides (City of Santa Barbara 2020).

The low-lying areas of the City include the City’s waterfront, lower downtown area, Airport, and Arroyo Burro County Beach Park. These low-lying areas have experienced coastal flooding due to storms surges and wave attacks, although the currently wide beaches fronting the City of Santa Barbara’s waterfront tend to reduce such hazards. In these sandy beaches and low-lying areas in the City, impacts from erosion, tidal inundation, and storm waves are generally limited to the area south of Cabrillo Boulevard (City of Santa Barbara 2020).

Stearns Wharf is exposed to wave damage during large storms and a 100-year coastal event is expected to require temporary closure and significant structural repairs. The harbor includes the

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 61
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan marina, commercial uses, parking, industrial areas, and the City Pier (sometimes called the “harbor pier”), which supports the Coast Guard and houses a fuel dock. Under existing conditions, storm events and the highest high tides (e.g., “King Tides”) can dislocate pile caps at the floating docks, and waves can overtop the harbor breakwater and reduce public access (City of Santa Barbara 2020).

Sea level rise coupled with increased frequency, severity, and duration of high tide and storm events related to climate change will result in more frequent and severe extreme events along the coast.

These events could expose the coast to severe flooding and erosion, damage to coastal structures and real estate, and salinity intrusion into delta areas and coastal aquifers (Projecting Future Sea Level, A Report from the California Climate Change Center 2006).

History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
Typically, coastal hazards increase during periods of major storms that can coincide with high tides, causing coastal flooding, coastal bluff erosion, and landslides such as those that were experienced during the 1983, 1998, and 2015/2016 El Niño storms. Segments of the South Coast, in particular, have been subject to significant damage from coastal hazards. Homes along the City’s coastline suffered substantial damage during the 1983 and 2015/2016 El Niño events. Subsequent El Niño seasons led to major beach erosion and further damage in some locations.

Historic coastal flooding has occurred along the county’s South Coast since the mid-1800s. Between 1862 and 2010, the county had 15 significant floods, 8 of which were deemed a Presidential Disaster Declaration (County of Santa Barbara 2011). Coastal flooding has historically damaged residences, crops, and transportation infrastructure and is highly costly (each costing millions of dollars) (County of Santa Barbara 2017).

Coastal erosion is a recurring and ongoing hazard in south county and is particularly severe along Padaro Lane, Channel Drive, Del Playa Drive, More Mesa, Goleta Beach, Hope Ranch, and Shoreline Park. Coastal erosion hazards have resulted in the adoption of required city and County blufftop setbacks because development in coastal communities generally require a minimum of 75 years of structural life. Many residences along Del Playa Drive in Isla Vista are threatened by coastal erosion and setbacks have eroded to the point many homes now sit on the cliff edge.

Probability of Occurrence
Coastal flooding from tidal inundation and wave attack and associated erosion of coastal bluffs and beaches occurs during many winters but is most pronounced during past major El Niño events, which have return intervals of 2 to 7 years. Although many private coastal properties and public facilities have been protected by rock revetments or seawalls in the County, coastal flooding, and beach and bluff erosion continue in areas such as the City. While the existing probability of occurrence is typically confined to El Niño seasons or major storm events, as discussed below, climate change and sea level rise are projected to increase in frequency and severity of occurrence.

Climate Change Considerations
The County’s 2017 Coastal Resiliency Project projects sea level in the county will rise by 10.2 inches in 2030, 27.2 inches by 2060, and 60.2 inches in 2100 (County of Santa Barbara 2017). The

5.0. Hazard Assessment
62 February 2023
County modeled coastal hazards for coastal armoring and no coastal armoring. Particularly susceptible areas of the county to sea level rise related impacts include Isla Vista, Goleta Beach County Park, and the Santa Barbara Airport, coastal bluff homes in Summerland, Toro Canyon and Padaro Lane, segments of the UPRR and Highway 101 from the City of Carpinteria to the Gaviota Coast, including the City of Santa Barbara (County of Santa Barbara 2017).

Additionally, more specific coastal hazard modeling was performed for the City by Environmental Science Associates as part of the city’s 2021 Sea Level Rise Adaptation and Vulnerability Plan. This plan similarly concluded that the most susceptible areas of the City include Downtown Santa Barbara, East Beach, and Leadbetter Beach (City of Santa Barbara 2021). See Section 6.7, Coastal Hazards for more information about the Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan’s assessment of vulnerabilities in the City from coastal hazards.

Based on these studies, sea levels are projected to rise by as much as 6.6 feet by 2100, though more extreme scenarios project sea levels rising as much as 7.1 feet by 2100; however, these extreme scenarios are based on worst-case GHG emissions assumptions, are highly conservative, and considered to be very unlikely of occurring (refer to Table 5-11 of the MJHMP). While sea level rise projections will continue to change as scientific understanding increases and policy choices manifest, what is clear for the most current projections is that sea levels are bound to increase at a significant rate, further increasing both the probability and severity of coastal hazards throughout all of Santa Barbara County (Ocean Protection Council 2018).

5.3.13 Extreme Heat
Description of Hazard
Extreme heat is defined by FEMA as temperatures that hover 10 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) or more above the regional average high temperature or over 100 °F in California and last for at least three days or even as long as several weeks (FEMA 2021). Extreme heat is a function of heat and relative humidity. A heat index describes how hot the heat‐humidity combination makes the air feel.

As relative humidity increases, the air seems warmer than it is because the body is less capable of cooling itself or regulating heat via evaporation of perspiration. As the heat index rises, so do health risks such as heat exhaustion, sunstroke, and heatstroke.

While the effects of extreme heat on human health can be severe, so too can its effects be on natural ecosystems, services, infrastructure, and various economic sectors (e.g., agricultural sector).

During periods of extreme heat, transportation, gas, power, and other services may be disrupted, and critical infrastructure may be destroyed or damaged (FEMA 2021). The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), alongside OSHA, provides a Heat Safety Tool App that offers occupational safety and health recommendations based on the heat index (OSHA 2021).

Each extreme heat day or heat wave can present additional risk of other hazards present within the County but is primarily a direct contributor to wildfire hazards and risks (refer to Section 5.3.1, Wildfire). As heat increases, the need for additional cooling systems to avoid mechanical failure increases as well. This can increase costs to consumers and may contribute to climate change if fossil fuels are used to generate the electricity needed to operate cooling systems.

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 63
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara All of Santa Barbara County can experience extreme heat. Coastal communities such as the City on average have lower temperatures compared to communities in the inland areas of the county and could be less at risk to extreme temperatures although potentially less acclimatized to high temperatures if they occur.

History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara County and the City have experienced several extreme heat events in the past; however, they are not well documented. One documented event reported as “simoon”, occurred on June 17, 1859, where a record temperature of 133 °F was taken during an extreme heat and wind event that struck Santa Barbara in the early afternoon (Noozhawk 2020). More recently, according to the NOAA Storm Events Database, a combination of high pressure and high humidity caused temperatures to spike to between 100 °F and 119 °F on July 22, 2006, throughout southern California, including the county (NOAA 2021). In 2020, heatwaves in the Santa Ynez Valley with temperatures reaching 118 °F caused early grape harvests at wineries (Jervis 2020).

Probability of Occurrence
In any given year, the City can be subject to extreme heat conditions.

Climate Change Considerations
Historically, Santa Barbara County has experienced an average of four extreme heat days a year, however, this is expected to increase to 12 extreme heat events per year by 2030, 19 extreme heat events per year by 2060, and 34 extreme heat events per year by 2100 (Santa Barbara County Planning and Development Department 2021). Due to the rising temperatures, heat waves are likely to become more frequent, which will have direct impacts on human health in terms of heat-related illness. Outdoor laborers will be most vulnerable to the rising temperatures and most at risk for heat-related illnesses. Residents will also be vulnerable to rising temperatures, as many of the homes on the coast do not have air conditioning units, as there was less of a need in the past, and therefore may be less prepared compared to the inland region of the county to adapt to extreme heat events.

Cascading impacts include increased stress on water quantity and quality, degraded air quality, and increased potential for more severe or catastrophic natural events such as heavy rain, droughts, and wildfire. Another cascading impact includes increased duration and intensity of wildfires with warmer temperatures.

Extreme heat has also been shown to accelerate wear and tear on the natural gas system and electrical infrastructure. Projected increases in summer demand associated with rising temperatures may increase risks to energy infrastructure and may exceed the capacity of existing substations and distribution line infrastructure and systems.

5.0. Hazard Assessment
64 February 2023

5.3.14 Hazardous Materials Release
Description of Hazard
Hazardous Waste/Materials are widely used or created at facilities such as hospitals, wastewater treatments plants, universities, and industrial/manufacturing warehouses. Several household products such as cleaning supplies and paint are also considered hazardous materials. Hazardous materials include:
• Explosives;
• Flammable, non-flammable, and poisonous gases;
• Flammable liquids;
• Flammable, spontaneously combustible, and dangerous when wet solids; • Oxidizers and organic peroxides;
• Poisons and infectious substances;
• Radioactive materials; and
• Corrosive materials.

Both mobile and external hazardous materials releases can spread and affect a wide area, through the release of plumes of chemical, biological, or radiological elements or leaks or spills. Conversely, internal releases are more likely to be confined to the structure the material is stored in.

Chemicals may be corrosive or otherwise damaging over time. A hazardous materials release could also result in fire or explosion. Contamination may be carried out of the immediate area of the incident by people, vehicles, wind, and water. Weather conditions can increase the size and intensity of the Hazardous Materials Release. Typography, such as hills and canyons, can increase the size of the release or make it more difficult to contain.

Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara The locations and identity of facilities that store hazardous materials are reported to local and federal governments. Many facilities have their own hazardous materials guides and response plans, including transportation companies that transport hazardous materials.

The release of hazardous materials into the environment can cause a multitude of problems.

Although these incidents can happen almost anywhere, certain areas of the City are at higher risk, such as near roadways that are frequently used to transport hazardous materials and locations with industrial facilities that use, store, and/or dispose of such materials. Areas crossed by railways, waterways, airways, and pipelines also have increased potential for mishaps.

History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
Several significant hazardous material incidents have occurred in the County in the past century, and include the oil spills which occurred in 1969, 1997, 2007, 2008, 2015, and 2020 (see Section

5.3.15, Oil Spill for a detailed discussion of these incidents and risks associated with oil spill-related hazards). Approximately 550 hazardous materials incidents in the City were reported to the Cal OES Warning Center from 2006 through 2021, which is the largest number of incidents by far when compared to any other city within the county. These incidents include both transportation and

5.0. Hazard Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 65
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan fixed-facility incidents. This list does not capture all hazardous material spills within the City, only those that were significant enough to be reported to Cal OES (refer to Table 5-18 of the MJHMP for a summary of hazardous materials incidents reported to Cal OES in Santa Barbara County by location and type). The data indicates that hazardous materials incidents can occur across the county with a greater frequency in the more developed areas.

Probability of Occurrence
Given that 550 significant hazardous materials incidents occurred within the City over 15 years (i.e., between 2006 and 2021), these incidents occur approximately 37 times per year or twice per month. Incidences can occur during the production, storage, transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Communities can be at risk if a chemical is used unsafely or released in harmful amounts into the environment. Hazardous materials can cause death, serious injury, long-lasting health effects, and damage to buildings, the environment, homes, and other property.

Climate Change Consideration
There are no known effects of climate change on human-caused hazards including hazardous material and waste incidents. However, the weather may play a factor in hazardous material releases. While there is little evidence to link climate change increase occurrences of hazardous material releases, it could impact the response and recovery efforts.

5.3.15 Oil Spill
Description of Hazard
An oil spill is a release of liquid petroleum hydrocarbon into the environment due to human activity or technological error that results in pollution of land, water, and air. Oil releases also occur naturally through oil seeps either on land or underwater. Marine oil spills, whether accidental or intentional, can result from the release of crude oil from offshore oil platforms, drilling rigs, wells, pipelines, tank trucks, and marine tank vessels (tankers). Refined petroleum products such as gasoline, diesel, and heavier fuels such as bunker fuel used by cargo ships are also sources of potential oil spill releases. Depending on the origin, size, and duration of the release, an oil spill can have serious impacts on air and water quality, public health, plant and animal habitat, and biological resources.

Clean up and recovery is time and cost consuming, and dependent on weather conditions such as wind and rain. Tidal and Current conditions may also make the spill more dynamic.

Location and Extent of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara This hazard can occur in any part of Santa Barbara County where existing oil and gas operations are located, either onshore through supply pipelines and well facilities or offshore where there are several platforms and undersea pipelines. Currently, there are 19 offshore oil platforms off the coast of Santa Barbara County as well as two onshore refineries and six oil separation and treatment plants (refer to Figure 5-32 of the MJHMP; County Department of Planning and Development 2017).

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
66 February 2023
History of Hazard in the City of Santa Barbara
The City has experienced several large oil spills. In 1969, an estimated total of 100,000 barrels (4.2 million gallons) of crude oil was spilled from Platform A of a Union Oil drilling rig platform into the ocean and onto nearby shores over several months. In 2015, a 24-inch subterranean pipeline owned and operated by Plains All America Pipeline ruptured on the Gaviota Coast, west of Refugio State Park. Much of the crude oil spilled ran down a storm drain and into a ravine under the freeway and entered the ocean. The size of the spill ranged from 100,000 to 140,000 gallons, covering the Santa Barbara County coastline and extending nearly 9 miles out into the ocean. Refer to Section 5.6.7 of the MJHMP for a detailed description of these incidents and other oil spills in the county.

Probability of Occurrence
In any given year, Santa Barbara City could be subject to oil spills onshore or offshore.

Climate Change Considerations
With increased changes in weather, climate, and economics, the demands for oil and gas production may shift. This shift in demand could increase production, distribution, and transportation of oil products; thus, increasing the potential oil spill occurrences.

6.0 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
The vulnerability assessment builds on the hazard assessment provided in Section 5.0 of the LHMP and Chapter 5.0 of the 2022 MJHMP to estimate losses where data is available and consider a specific list of critical facilities identified within the City of Santa Barbara. The City identified 233 critical facilities to be included in the Vulnerability Assessment portion of the LHMP. These facilities primarily included utilities, government, and educational structures as well as bridges. Of the available data, it was shown that these buildings are worth approximately $117,303,136 in total building value (i.e., structural and content value) (Table 6-1). No values were able to be obtained for many major facilities, so the actual value may be much more than this amount.

Table 6-1. Critical Facilities in the City of Santa Barbara Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Communications Vic Trace Ac -
Paging Tower Dial Page, Inc 923 Laguna Street -
Paging Tower Dial Page, Inc 320 West Pueblo Street -
Community
Center
Recreation 1232 De La Vina Street -
Community
Center
Recreation 100 E. Carrillo Street -
Community
Center
Lower Westside Community Center 629 Coronel Place -
Community
Center
Franklin Community Center 1136 E. Montecito Street -
Hydrology Field Hydrology Field Installations 735 Anacapa Street $463,890

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 67
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Reservoir Escondido Pump Station and
Reservoir
2300 Skyline Way -
Reservoir La Cornilla Pump Station and Vic
Trace Reservoir
1631 La Coronilla Drive -
Utilities Sheffield Pump Station 2375 Foothill Road -
Utilities Skofield Pump Station 2117 Mount Calvary -
Utilities Laguna Pump Station 236 E. Cabrillo Blvd -
Water District Goleta West Water District J Road -
Water
Treatment Plant
Cater Water Treatment Plant 1150 San Roque Road -
Water
Treatment Plant
Ortega Well Treatment Plant 220 E. Ortega Street -
Water
Treatment Plant
Ortega Well Treatment Plant 631 Garden St -
Water
Treatment Plant
Sheffield Treatment Plant 530 Mountain Drive -
Water
Treatment Plant
Charles E. Meyer Main
Desalination Plant
525 E. Yananoli St. -
Water
Treatment Plant
SCADA / MCC Building 525 E. Yananoli St. -
Water
Treatment Plant
El Estero Water Resources Center 520 E. Yananoli St. -
Clinic McDonald Building Human
Resources
1226 Anacapa Street $1,036,791
Clinic Sansum Clinic-Pesetas 215 Pesetas Ln -
Clinic Santa Barbara Community Dialysis
Center
222 Pesetas Lane -
Clinic Valle Verde Health Facility- SNF 900 Calle De Los Amigos - Clinic La Cumbre Senior Living Concepts 3880 Via Lucero - Clinic Vista Del Monte Sunridge SNF 3775 Modoc Road -
Clinic Sansum Clinic-Hitchcock 51 Hitchcock -
Clinic Samarkand- Smith Center- SNF 2566 Treasure Drive - Clinic Mission Terrace Convalescent
Hospital
623 West Junipero Street -
Clinic Sansum Clinic- Ob/ Gyn 515 W. Pueblo St -
Clinic Cottage Rehabilitation Hospital 2415 De La Vina Street - Clinic Sansum Clinic- Pueblo 317 Pueblo St -
Clinic Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Bath At Pueblo -
Clinic Santa Barbara Convalescent
Hospital
2225 De La Vina Street -
Clinic Santa Barbara Neighborhood
Clinic- Westside
628 W. Micheltorena Street -
Clinic Santa Barbara Artificial Kidney
Center
1704 State Street, #2 -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
68 February 2023
Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Clinic Santa Barbara Neighborhood
Clinic- Eastside
915 N Milpas St -
Clinic PhD Franklin Clinic 1136 Montecito St -
Clinic PhD Children’s Medical Services 1111 Chapala Street $375,583 EMS Station American Medical Response
Station 3
415 West Figueroa Street -
EMS Station American Medical Response
Station 4
1025 Castillo Street -
Nursing Home Cliff View Terrace 1020 Cliff Drive -
Nursing Home Alto Lucero Transitional Care 3880 Via Lucero - Nursing Home The Californian 2225 De La Vina St -
Nursing Home Alexander Court 325 W Islay St -
Nursing Home Samarkand Skilled Nursing Facility 2566 Treasure Dr - Nursing Home Samarkand of Santa Barbara 2550 Treasure Drive - Nursing Home Wood Glen Hall, Inc. 3010 Foothill Road -
Nursing Home Mission Villa 321 West Mission Street -
Nursing Home Vista Del Monte 3775 Modoc Road -
Nursing Home Valle Verde Health Facility 900 Calle De Los Amigos - Nursing Home Alexander Gardens 2120 Santa Barbara Street - Nursing Home Mission Terrace Convalescent
Hospital
623 W Junipero St -
Nursing Home Oak Cottage of Santa Barbara
Memory Care
1820 Delavina Street -
Nursing Home Garden Court at Villa Santa
Barbara
227 E. Anapamu Street -
Nursing Home Villa Alamar 45 East Alamar -
Nursing Home Villa Riviera 1621 Grand Avenue -
Nursing Home Mountain House 37 Mountain Drive -
Nursing Home At Home in Santa Barbara 1801 Bath Street - Veteran Services Sb Veterans Memorial Bldg. 112 W. Cabrillo Blvd. $2,034,893 Airport Patrol Santa Barbara Airport Patrol 601 Firestone Road - Colleges /
Universities
Fielding Graduate University 2020 De La Vina St -
Colleges /
Universities
The Santa Barbara and Ventura
Colleges of Law At Santa Barbara
20 E Victoria St -
Colleges /
Universities
Antioch University-Santa Barbara 602 Anacapa Street -
Colleges /
Universities
Santa Barbara City College 721 Cliff Drive -
Court County Courthouse 1100 Anacapa Street $40,553,793 Court Sb Superior Court Building 118 E. Figueroa Street $9,343,534 Court County Courthouse Annex 1100 Anacapa St $6,023,849 Court Court Services Bldg. 118 E. Figueroa Street $357,608

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 69
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Education Saint Vincent Orphanage and
School Building
925 De La Vina Street -
Education Santa Barbara Unified Early
Childhood
1030 E. Yanonali St. -
Education Adelante Charter 1102 E. Yanonali St. -
Education Franklin Elementary 1111 E. Mason St. -
Education Harding University Partnership 1625 Robbins St. - Education Monte Vista Elementary 730 N. Hope Ave. -
Education Alta Vista Alternative High 215 E. Ortega St. - Education McKinley Elementary 350 Loma Alta Dr. -
Education Roosevelt Elementary 1990 Laguna St. -
Education Open Alternative 4025 Foothill Rd. -
Education Monroe Elementary 431 Flora Vista Dr. -
Education Alta Vista Alternative Junior High 215 E. Ortega St. - Education La Cumbre Junior High 2255 Modoc Rd. -
Education Santa Barbara Community
Academy
850 Portesuello Ave. -
Education Adams Elementary 2701 Las Positas Rd. -
Education Santa Barbara Junior High 721 E. Cota St. -
Education Santa Barbara Senior High 700 E. Anapamu St. - Education La Cuesta Continuation High 710 Santa Barbara St. - Education Washington Elementary 290 Lighthouse Rd. -
Education Hope Elementary 3970-A La Colina Rd. -
Education La Colina Junior High 4025 Foothill Rd. -
Education Cleveland Elementary 123 Alameda Padre Serra - Education Peabody Charter 3018 Calle Noguera -
Education Providence-SBCS 3723 Modoc Rd -
Education El Montecito School San Roque 3225 Calle Pinon - Education Notre Dame School 33 E Micheltorena St -
Education Bishop Garcia Diego High School 4000 La Colina Rd - Education Sunrise Montessori School 1201 E Yanonali St - Education Providence 630 E Canon Perdido St -
Education Santa Barbara Middle School 1321 Alameda Padre Serra - Education The Knox School of Santa Barbara 1525 Santa Barbara St - Education Eureka School of Santa Barbara 3324 State St Ste M - Education St Therese Classical Academy 33 E Micheltorena St - Fire Station Fire Station 4 19 N. Ontare Road -
Fire Station Fire Station 5 2505 Modoc Road -
Fire Station Fire Station 6 1802 Cliff Drive -
Fire Station Fire Station 1 121 W. Carrillo St -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
70 February 2023
Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Fire Station Fire Station 3 415 E. Sola Street -
Fire Station Fire Station 7 605 Mission Ridge Road -
Fire Station Fire Training 30 S. Olive Street (2 S. Cesar Chavez) - Fire Station Fire Station 2 819 Cacique -
Fire Station Airport Fire Station 8 40 Hartley Place -
Government Administration Building 105 E. Anapamu Street $27,266,352 Government Engineering Building 123 E. Anapamu Street $11,145,938 Government Sbch East Wing 1105 Santa Barbara Street $7,308,080 Government Probation Building 117 E. Carrillo Street $4,216,037 Government Hall Of Records 1100 Anacapa Street $4,179,732 Government Schwartz Building 130 E Victoria St $2,652,501 Government City Hall 735 Anacapa Street -
Government Public Works 220 E. Ortega Street -
Government Public Works 630 Garden Street -
Government Community Development 630 Garden Street -
Government Public Works 630 Garden Street -
Government Public Works Yard 635 Laguna Street -
Government Admin Well Corp. at Parks
Department
402 East Ortega Street -
Government Parks And Recreation 620 Laguna St. -
Government ADMHS Offices 2034 De La Vina Street $145,154 Government Sb Child Support Office 4 East Carrillo Street $199,401 Harbor Patrol Santa Barbara Waterfront
Harbor Patrol
132 Harbor Way A, Po Box 1990 -
Historic Site Virginia Hotel 17 And 23 West Haley Street - Historic Site Mission Santa Barbara 2201 Laguna Street - Historic Site Janssens-Orella-Birk-Building 1029 - 1031 State Street - Historic Site Hill-Carrillo Adobe 11 East Carrillo Street - Historic Site Old Lobero Theatre 33 E. Canon Perdido -
Historic Site Casa De La Guerra 808-818 State Street, 813 - 819 Anacapa Street, 9 - 25 E. De La Guerra
Street
-
Historic Site Santa Barbara Presidio 123 East Canon Perdido Street - Historic Site Hastings Adobe 414 W. Montecito Street -
Historic Site Covarrubias Adobe 715 Santa Barbara Street - Historic Site Rafael Gonzalez House 835 Laguna Street - Historic Site Faith Mission 409 State Street -
Historic Site Los Banos Del Mar 401 Shoreline Drive -
Historic Site Andalucía Building 316 - 324 State Street - Historic Site Burton Mound 129 W. Mason At Burton Circle - Police Police Department 215 E. Figueroa St. -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 71
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Post Office US Post Office Main 836 Anacapa Street -
Airport Santa Barbara Airport 500 James Fowler Road -
Bridge Bridge 'Olive Mill Road' / 'U.S. Highway 101' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 192' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Castillo Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Carrillo Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Mission Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Mission Street' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 225' / UPRR -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Garden Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Garden Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'State Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'State Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Sycamore Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Cacique Street' -
Bridge Bridge 'Mission Canyon Rd' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Las Canoas Rd' / 'Rattlesnake Canyon' -
Bridge Bridge 'Ontare Road' / 'San Roque Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Hollister Ave' / 'Carneros Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Gutierrez St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'State St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Castillo Street' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Carrillo St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Street' / 'San Roque Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Pueblo St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Montecito St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'James Fowler Road' / 'San Pedro Creek' - Bridge Bridge 'Quinientos St' / 'Sycamore Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Torino Drive' / 'Arroyo Burro Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Por Lamar Dr' / 'Sycamore Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Ninos Dr' / 'Sycamore Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Zoological Garden' / 'Sycamore Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Carpinteria St' / 'Sycamore Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'De La Guerra St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Firestone' / 'Carneros Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Pedregosa Street' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Calle De Los Amigo' / 'Arroyo Burro
Creek'
-
Bridge Bridge 'Fairview Ave' / 'Up Rr & Amtrak' -
Bridge Bridge 'East Cabrillo Blvd' / 'Laguna Channel' -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
72 February 2023
Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Bridge Bridge 'E Mason Street' / 'Sycamore Canyon
Creek'
-
Bridge Bridge 'De La Vina St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Ortega Street' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Primavera Road' / 'Cieneguitas Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Hope Avenue' / 'Arroyo Burro Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Cabrillo Blvd' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Cabrillo Blvd' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 192' / 'San Roque Canyon' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 192' / 'Sycamore Canyon
Creek'
-
Bridge Bridge 'State St (Wb)' / 'Us Highway 101' -
Bridge Bridge 'State St (Eb)' / 'Us Highway 101' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 225' / HWY 101' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Carrillo Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb Rt Lane' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Quarantina Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Salsipuedes Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Chapala St Equalizer' -
Bridge Bridge 'La Cumbre Road' / HWY 101' -
Bridge Bridge 'Micheltorena St' / HWY UPRR Mission' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Milpas Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Cacique Street' -
Bridge Bridge 'Cliff Drive' / 'Arroyo Burro Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Hollister Avenue' / 'San Pedro Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Mission St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Alamar Ave' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Street' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Valerio St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Junipero Street' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Tallant Road' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Yanonali Street' / 'Laguna Drainage
Channel'
-
Bridge Bridge 'East Cabrillo Blvd' / 'Sycamore Creek' - Bridge Bridge 'Chapala Street' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Punta Gorda Road' / 'Punta Gorda
Creek'
-

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 73
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Bridge Bridge 'Cliff Drive' / 'Hillside' -
Bridge Bridge 'Anapamu Street' / 'Old Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Castillo Street' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 154' / 'La Colina Rd' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 154' / 'Primavera Rd' -
Bridge Bridge 'Hollister Avenue' / 'Tecolotito Creek' - Bridge Bridge 'Arrellaga Street' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'De La Vina St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Islay St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Bath St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Matthews Street' / 'San Pedro Creek' -
Government Buses/Vehicles -
Train Depot Southern Pacific Train Depot 209 State Street - Using a GIS and the mapped extents of the hazards affecting the City, it was determined which critical facilities are exposed to which hazards depending on whether they fall within the mapped hazard area. The results of the exposure analysis are included in this section. A further description of the threats and methodologies used in this analysis is provided in Chapter 6.0, Vulnerability Assessment of the 2022 MJHMP. As the City continues to assess its vulnerability, the collection of better and more complete data will help to improve the risk assessment process to direct planning and mitigation decisions.

Table 6-2. Summary of Potential Impacts on Critical Facilities Hazard Type Specific Risk Count
% of Critical
Facilities
Impacted
Exposure ($)
Wildfire
Moderate Wildfire Threat 6 3% -
Very High Wildfire Threat 1 0.5% -
Earthquake
High Liquefaction Potential 75 32% $2,034,893
Moderate Liquefaction Potential 61 26% -
Flood
1% Chance FEMA Flood Zone 73 31% $2,034,893

0.2% Chance FEMA Flood Zone 6 3% -
Tsunami 23 10% $2,034,893
Dam Failure Lauro and Glen Annie Dam Failure 21 9% -
Landslide Class 7 and 9 40 17% -
Coastal
Hazards
Sea Level Rise (2030) 14 6% -
Sea Level Rise (2060) 19 8% -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
74 February 2023

6.1 WILDFIRE
The City and surrounding landscape exhibit a complex wildfire environment that presents a significant wildfire risk due to steep and varied terrain, a mosaic of different vegetation types, and a Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) development pattern. The southern side of the Santa Ynez Mountains, including portions of the City, has a significant history of devastating wildland fires, including 2 of the state’s 20 most destructive wildfires—the 1990 Paint Fire and the 2017 Thomas Fire. The Santa Barbara Fire Department recognizes the catastrophic impact of wildfire in the community and is committed to reducing hazards and risk through fire protection, fuel hazard reduction, public education, preparedness, and community involvement.

Santa Barbara County has extensive areas within mapped Fire Hazard Severity Zones and Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) areas. These hazard areas generate vulnerability for life and structures, including critical facilities, throughout the county, but most severely within rural foothills areas where dry vegetation, steep slopes, and difficult access combine to create a high probability of wildfire. The City is surrounded by wildland vegetation and the western and southern slopes of the Santa Ynez Mountains. The City contains WUI area and has therefore been designated as a WUI community at risk. Based on these maps, the City has 321 acres (2.55 percent) within Very High Wildfire Threat areas, 746 acres (5.91 percent) within High Wildfire Threat areas, 942 acres (7.47 percent) within Moderate Wildfire Threat areas, and 94 acres (0.74 percent) within Low Wildfire Threat areas. Most of these areas are residential with limited vulnerabilities in commercial, agricultural, and industrial areas.

Based on the GIS analysis conducted for the 2022 MJHMP, in Santa Barbara, 561 improved properties with a total value of over $687 million are vulnerable to wildfire. In Santa Barbara, approximately 1,333 residents live in very high, high, moderate, or low wildfire threat areas. This information is summarized in Table 6-3 below (see also, Section 6.3.1, Wildfire of the 2022 MJHMP). Figure 6-1 shows the fire threat in the City. Fire threat is a combination of two factors: 1) fire frequency or the likelihood of a given area burning, and 2) potential fire behavior. These two factors are combined to create four threat classes ranging from Moderate to Extreme. While the probability for the City is likely lower due to the urban environment and the Pacific Ocean to the south, the threat remains Moderate. However, northern portions of the City are adjacent to High and Very High threat areas.

Table 6-3. City of Santa Barbara at Risk to Wildfire Threat Property Type Improved Parcel Count by Wildfire Threat Level Total Value Population Extreme Very High High Moderate Low Total
Agricultural 0 1 0 0 0 1 $90,528
Commercial 0 0 1 6 0 7 $48,704,948
Exempt 0 0 1 3 0 4 $4,194,834
Industrial 0 0 0 1 0 1 $69,301,580
Mixed Use 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 0
Residential 0 60 198 253 33 544 $562,254,207 1,333
Improved Vacant 0 0 3 1 0 4 $2,935,184
Total 0 61 203 264 33 561 $687,481,281 1,333

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 75
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Figure 6-1. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities within Wildfire Threat Zones

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
76 February 2023
Seven of the City’s critical facilities fall within Very High or Moderate wildfire threat areas, as listed in Table 6-4 (see also, Section 6.3.1, Wildfire of the 2022 MJHMP).

Table 6-4. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities Vulnerable to Wildfire Type Critical Facility Hazard Source/Type Total Building Value Water Treatment Plant Cater Water Treatment Plant Moderate Wildfire Threat - Clinic Sansum Clinic Moderate Wildfire Threat -
Airport Santa Barbara Airport Moderate Wildfire Threat - Bridge Bridge Very High Wildfire Threat -
Bridge Bridge Moderate Wildfire Threat -
Bridge Bridge Moderate Wildfire Threat -
Bridge Bridge Moderate Wildfire Threat -
The City has also delineated local High Fire Hazard Zones, linking to local wildfire management and response strategies in the CWPP. The CWPP is maintained to protect lives, property, and natural resources threatened by wildland fire. Development of the CWPP included an assessment of wildfire hazard to identify the High Fire Hazard Area of the City. The hazard assessment was used to evaluate the extent of the City’s four High Fire Hazard Area Zones (Extreme Foothill, Foothill, Coastal Interior, and Coastal).

The CWPP includes an assessment of wildfire hazard, which involved modeling potential fire behavior in the City under extreme wind and weather conditions, consistent with conditions experienced during a Sundowner wind event. Other wildfire hazard variables were evaluated (terrain, weather, fuels, development patterns, fire department response, structure density, etc.) to identify the High Fire Hazard

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 77
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

6.2 EARTHQUAKE & LIQUEFACTION
Chapter 6.0, Vulnerabilities Assessment of the 2022 MJHMP addresses regional seismicity under two scenarios that include the City of Santa Barbara. The 2,500-year scenario considers general seismicity from multiple faults in the region and a 7.0 magnitude event. The methodology utilizes probabilistic seismic hazard contour maps developed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for the 2018 update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps that are included with Hazus-MH. A deterministic scenario was also prepared to predict the outcome of a specific earthquake event.

The deterministic scenarios used USGS provided ShakeMap datasets to model a Magnitude 7.4 earthquake of the Red Mountain Fault. This scenario assesses the effect that an earthquake sourced from this fault would generate in terms of damages and losses for the chosen area of interest (i.e., southern Santa Barbara County, including the City). Figure 6-2 is the ShakeMap produced for this scenario.

As described in the MJHMP, regional losses to people and property would include the City. As shown in the Red Mountain Fault ShakeMap scenario, the south and central parts of the county would perceive much stronger shaking and would likely receive the most severe damage when compared to the rest of the county. The entire City would perceive severe to extreme shaking and would likely receive moderate/heavy to very heavy damage. Direct effects of ground shaking could damage buildings and create dangerous debris and unstable structures. Displaced residents would likely seek shelter in the City, including residents from outside the City. Further, fires often occur after an earthquake. Because of the number of fires and the lack of water to fight the fires, they can often burn out of control.

Unreinforced masonry building type structures consist of buildings made of unreinforced concrete and brick, hollow concrete blocks, clay tiles, and adobe. Buildings constructed of these materials are heavy and brittle and typically provide little earthquake resistance. In small earthquakes, unreinforced buildings can crack, and in strong earthquakes, they tend to collapse. The City does not have any known unreinforced masonry buildings.

The City lies in an area with high, moderate, and low liquefaction severity classes. Regional earthquakes could cause liquefaction in the City, which could damage buildings and utilities when soils become unstable. Based on the GIS analysis conducted for the 2022 MJHMP, the City has 123,784 improved parcels valued at over $21 billion in liquefaction severity zones. Based on this analysis, which accounts for residents only and not workers, 52,849 residents are living in this hazard zone within the City. While liquefaction would not likely affect all areas uniformly during an earthquake, this analysis indicates the extent and scale of vulnerabilities to liquefaction during a large earthquake.

Table 6-5. City of Santa Barbara at Risk to Liquefaction Hazard by Property Type Property Type Improved Parcel
Count Total Value Population
High Liquefaction Hazard
Agricultural 0 $0
Commercial 441 $770,747,018
Exempt 26 $40,500,456

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
78 February 2023
Property Type Improved Parcel
Count Total Value Population
Industrial 193 $386,752,938
Mixed Use 43 $171,822,528 105
Residential 2,212 $2,036,799,933 5,419
Improved Vacant 9 $3,921,284
Total High Liquefaction 2,924 $3,410,544,157 5,525
Moderate Liquefaction Hazard
Agricultural 0 $0
Commercial 432 $933,498,844
Exempt 48 $179,684,078
Industrial 113 $109,571,348
Mixed Use 29 $153,807,638 71
Residential 5,868 $2,849,407,328 14,377
Improved Vacant 7 $4,990,218
Total Moderate Liquefaction 6,497 $4,230,959,453 14,448 Low Liquefaction Hazard
Agricultural 3 $1,476,116
Commercial 755 $2,296,776,766
Exempt 113 $2,098,371,104
Industrial 7 $5,104,908
Mixed Use 40 $131,219,472 98
Residential 13,379 $9,195,180,227 32,779
Improved Vacant 66 $60,205,324
Total Low Liquefaction 14,363 $13,788,333,916 32,877
Total Liquefaction Hazard 23,784 $21,429,837,526 52,849 As listed in Table 6-6, all critical facilities in the City would be vulnerable to damage or destruction from ground shaking and liquefaction during a significant regional earthquake (Figure 6-3; see also, Section 6.2.1, Earthquake (Groundshaking) and Section 6.3.3, Liquefaction (Earthquake) of the 2022 MJHMP).

Table 6-6. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities Vulnerable to Groundshaking & Liquefaction Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Communications Vic Trace Ac -
Paging Tower Dial Page, Inc 923 Laguna Street -
Paging Tower Dial Page, Inc 320 West Pueblo Street -
Community
Center
Recreation 1232 De La Vina Street -
Community
Center
Recreation 100 E. Carrillo Street -
Community
Center
Lower Westside Community Center 629 Coronel Place -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 79
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Community
Center
Franklin Community Center 1136 E. Montecito Street -
Hydrology Field Hydrology Field Installations 735 Anacapa Street $463,890 Reservoir Escondido Pump Station and
Reservoir
2300 Skyline Way -
Reservoir La Cornilla Pump Station and Vic
Trace Reservoir
1631 La Coronilla Drive -
Utilities Sheffield Pump Station 2375 Foothill Road -
Utilities Skofield Pump Station 2117 Mount Calvary -
Utilities Laguna Pump Station 236 E. Cabrillo Blvd -
Water District Goleta West Water District J Road -
Water
Treatment Plant
Cater Water Treatment Plant 1150 San Roque Road -
Water
Treatment Plant
Ortega Well Treatment Plant 220 E. Ortega Street -
Water
Treatment Plant
Ortega Well Treatment Plant 631 Garden St -
Water
Treatment Plant
Sheffield Treatment Plant 530 Mountain Drive -
Water
Treatment Plant
Charles E. Meyer Main
Desalination Plant
525 E. Yananoli St. -
Water
Treatment Plant
SCADA / MCC Building 525 E. Yananoli St. -
Water
Treatment Plant
El Estero Water Resources Center 520 E. Yananoli St. -
Clinic McDonald Building Human
Resources
1226 Anacapa Street $1,036,791
Clinic Sansum Clinic-Pesetas 215 Pesetas Ln -
Clinic Santa Barbara Community Dialysis
Center
222 Pesetas Lane -
Clinic Valle Verde Health Facility- SNF 900 Calle De Los Amigos - Clinic La Cumbre Senior Living Concepts 3880 Via Lucero - Clinic Vista Del Monte Sunridge SNF 3775 Modoc Road -
Clinic Sansum Clinic-Hitchcock 51 Hitchcock -
Clinic Samarkand- Smith Center- SNF 2566 Treasure Drive - Clinic Mission Terrace Convalescent
Hospital
623 West Junipero Street -
Clinic Sansum Clinic- Ob/ Gyn 515 W. Pueblo St -
Clinic Cottage Rehabilitation Hospital 2415 De La Vina Street - Clinic Sansum Clinic- Pueblo 317 Pueblo St -
Clinic Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Bath At Pueblo -
Clinic Santa Barbara Convalescent
Hospital
2225 De La Vina Street -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
80 February 2023
Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Clinic Santa Barbara Neighborhood
Clinic- Westside
628 W. Micheltorena Street -
Clinic Santa Barbara Artificial Kidney
Center
1704 State Street, #2 -
Clinic Santa Barbara Neighborhood
Clinic- Eastside
915 N Milpas St -
Clinic PhD Franklin Clinic 1136 Montecito St -
Clinic PhD Children’s Medical Services 1111 Chapala Street $375,583 EMS Station American Medical Response
Station 3
415 West Figueroa Street -
EMS Station American Medical Response
Station 4
1025 Castillo Street -
Nursing Home Cliff View Terrace 1020 Cliff Drive -
Nursing Home Alto Lucero Transitional Care 3880 Via Lucero - Nursing Home The Californian 2225 De La Vina St -
Nursing Home Alexander Court 325 W Islay St -
Nursing Home Samarkand Skilled Nursing Facility 2566 Treasure Dr - Nursing Home Samarkand of Santa Barbara 2550 Treasure Drive - Nursing Home Wood Glen Hall, Inc. 3010 Foothill Road -
Nursing Home Mission Villa 321 West Mission Street -
Nursing Home Vista Del Monte 3775 Modoc Road -
Nursing Home Valle Verde Health Facility 900 Calle De Los Amigos - Nursing Home Alexander Gardens 2120 Santa Barbara Street - Nursing Home Mission Terrace Convalescent
Hospital
623 W Junipero St -
Nursing Home Oak Cottage of Santa Barbara
Memory Care
1820 Delavina Street -
Nursing Home Garden Court at Villa Santa
Barbara
227 E. Anapamu Street -
Nursing Home Villa Alamar 45 East Alamar -
Nursing Home Villa Riviera 1621 Grand Avenue -
Nursing Home Mountain House 37 Mountain Drive -
Nursing Home At Home in Santa Barbara 1801 Bath Street - Veteran Services Sb Veterans Memorial Bldg. 112 W. Cabrillo Blvd. $2,034,893 Aiport Patrol Santa Barbara Airport Patrol 601 Firestone Road - Colleges /
Universities
Fielding Graduate University 2020 De La Vina St -
Colleges /
Universities
The Santa Barbara and Ventura
Colleges of Law At Santa Barbara
20 E Victoria St -
Colleges /
Universities
Antioch University-Santa Barbara 602 Anacapa Street -
Colleges /
Universities
Santa Barbara City College 721 Cliff Drive -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 81
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Court County Courthouse 1100 Anacapa Street $40,553,793 Court Sb Superior Court Building 118 E. Figueroa Street $9,343,534 Court County Courthouse Annex 1100 Anacapa St $6,023,849 Court Court Services Bldg 118 E. Figueroa Street $357,608 Education Saint Vincent Orphanage and
School Building
925 De La Vina Street -
Education Santa Barbara Unified Early
Childhood
1030 E. Yanonali St. -
Education Adelante Charter 1102 E. Yanonali St. -
Education Franklin Elementary 1111 E. Mason St. -
Education Harding University Partnership 1625 Robbins St. - Education Monte Vista Elementary 730 N. Hope Ave. -
Education Alta Vista Alternative High 215 E. Ortega St. - Education McKinley Elementary 350 Loma Alta Dr. -
Education Roosevelt Elementary 1990 Laguna St. -
Education Open Alternative 4025 Foothill Rd. -
Education Monroe Elementary 431 Flora Vista Dr. -
Education Alta Vista Alternative Junior High 215 E. Ortega St. - Education La Cumbre Junior High 2255 Modoc Rd. -
Education Santa Barbara Community
Academy
850 Portesuello Ave. -
Education Adams Elementary 2701 Las Positas Rd. -
Education Santa Barbara Junior High 721 E. Cota St. -
Education Santa Barbara Senior High 700 E. Anapamu St. - Education La Cuesta Continuation High 710 Santa Barbara St. - Education Washington Elementary 290 Lighthouse Rd. -
Education Hope Elementary 3970-A La Colina Rd. -
Education La Colina Junior High 4025 Foothill Rd. -
Education Cleveland Elementary 123 Alameda Padre Serra - Education Peabody Charter 3018 Calle Noguera -
Education Providence-SBCS 3723 Modoc Rd -
Education El Montecito School San Roque 3225 Calle Pinon - Education Notre Dame School 33 E Micheltorena St -
Education Bishop Garcia Diego High School 4000 La Colina Rd - Education Sunrise Montessori School 1201 E Yanonali St - Education Providence 630 E Canon Perdido St -
Education Santa Barbara Middle School 1321 Alameda Padre Serra - Education The Knox School of Santa Barbara 1525 Santa Barbara St - Education Eureka School of Santa Barbara 3324 State St Ste M - Education St Therese Classical Academy 33 E Micheltorena St -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
82 February 2023
Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Fire Station Fire Station 4 19 N. Ontare Road -
Fire Station Fire Station 5 2505 Modoc Road -
Fire Station Fire Station 6 1802 Cliff Drive -
Fire Station Fire Station 1 121 W. Carrillo St -
Fire Station Fire Station 3 415 E. Sola Street -
Fire Station Fire Station 7 605 Mission Ridge Road -
Fire Station Fire Training 30 S. Olive Street (2 S. Cesar Chavez) - Fire Station Fire Station 2 819 Cacique -
Fire Station Airport Fire Station 8 40 Hartley Place -
Government Administration Building 105 E. Anapamu Street $27,266,352 Government Engineering Building 123 E. Anapamu Street $11,145,938 Government Sbch East Wing 1105 Santa Barbara Street $7,308,080 Government Probation Building 117 E. Carrillo Street $4,216,037 Government Hall Of Records 1100 Anacapa Street $4,179,732 Government Schwartz Building 130 E Victoria St $2,652,501 Government City Hall 735 Anacapa Street -
Government Public Works 220 E. Ortega Street -
Government Public Works 630 Garden Street -
Government Community Development 630 Garden Street -
Government Public Works 630 Garden Street -
Government Public Works Yard 635 Laguna Street -
Government Admin Well Corp. at Parks
Department
402 East Ortega Street -
Government Parks And Recreation 620 Laguna St. -
Government ADMHS Offices 2034 De La Vina Street $145,154 Government Sb Child Support Office 4 East Carrillo Street $199,401 Harbor Patrol Santa Barbara Waterfront
Harbor Patrol
132 Harbor Way A, Po Box 1990 -
Historic Site Virginia Hotel 17 And 23 West Haley Street - Historic Site Mission Santa Barbara 2201 Laguna Street - Historic Site Janssens-Orella-Birk-Building 1029 - 1031 State Street - Historic Site Hill-Carrillo Adobe 11 East Carrillo Street - Historic Site Old Lobero Theatre 33 E. Canon Perdido -
Historic Site Casa De La Guerra 808-818 State Street, 813 - 819 Anacapa Street, 9 - 25 E. De La Guerra
Street
-
Historic Site Santa Barbara Presidio 123 East Canon Perdido Street - Historic Site Hastings Adobe 414 W. Montecito Street -
Historic Site Covarrubias Adobe 715 Santa Barbara Street - Historic Site Rafael Gonzalez House 835 Laguna Street - Historic Site Faith Mission 409 State Street -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 83
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Historic Site Los Banos Del Mar 401 Shoreline Drive -
Historic Site Andalucía Building 316 - 324 State Street - Historic Site Burton Mound 129 W. Mason At Burton Circle - Police Police Department 215 E. Figueroa St. -
Post Office US Post Office Main 836 Anacapa Street -
Airport Santa Barbara Airport 500 James Fowler Road -
Bridge Bridge 'Olive Mill Road' / 'U.S. Highway 101' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 192' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Castillo Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Carrillo Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Mission Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Mission Street' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 225' / UPRR -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Garden Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Garden Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'State Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'State Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Sycamore Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Cacique Street' -
Bridge Bridge 'Mission Canyon Rd' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Las Canoas Rd' / 'Rattlesnake Canyon' -
Bridge Bridge 'Ontare Road' / 'San Roque Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Hollister Ave' / 'Carneros Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Gutierrez St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'State St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Castillo Street' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Carrillo St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Street' / 'San Roque Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Pueblo St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Montecito St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'James Fowler Road' / 'San Pedro Creek' - Bridge Bridge 'Quinientos St' / 'Sycamore Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Torino Drive' / 'Arroyo Burro Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Por Lamar Dr' / 'Sycamore Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Ninos Dr' / 'Sycamore Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Zoological Garden' / 'Sycamore Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Carpinteria St' / 'Sycamore Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'De La Guerra St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Firestone' / 'Carneros Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Pedregosa Street' / 'Mission Creek' -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
84 February 2023
Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Bridge Bridge 'Calle De Los Amigo' / 'Arroyo Burro
Creek'
-
Bridge Bridge 'Fairview Ave' / 'Up Rr & Amtrak' -
Bridge Bridge 'East Cabrillo Blvd' / 'Laguna Channel' - Bridge Bridge 'E Mason Street' / 'Sycamore Canyon
Creek'
-
Bridge Bridge 'De La Vina St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Ortega Street' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Primavera Road' / 'Cieneguitas Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Hope Avenue' / 'Arroyo Burro Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Cabrillo Blvd' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Cabrillo Blvd' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 192' / 'San Roque Canyon' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 192' / 'Sycamore Canyon
Creek'
-
Bridge Bridge 'State St (Wb)' / 'Us Highway 101' -
Bridge Bridge 'State St (Eb)' / 'Us Highway 101' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 225' / HWY 101' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Carrillo Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb Rt Lane' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Quarantina Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Salsipuedes Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Sb' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Chapala St Equalizer' -
Bridge Bridge 'La Cumbre Road' / HWY 101' -
Bridge Bridge 'Micheltorena St' / HWY UPRR Mission' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Milpas Street' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101' / 'Cacique Street' -
Bridge Bridge 'Cliff Drive' / 'Arroyo Burro Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Hollister Avenue' / 'San Pedro Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Mission St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Alamar Ave' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Street' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Valerio St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Junipero Street' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Tallant Road' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Yanonali Street' / 'Laguna Drainage
Channel'
-

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 85
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Type Name Address Total Building
Value
Bridge Bridge 'East Cabrillo Blvd' / 'Sycamore Creek' - Bridge Bridge 'Chapala Street' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Punta Gorda Road' / 'Punta Gorda
Creek'
-
Bridge Bridge 'Cliff Drive' / 'Hillside' -
Bridge Bridge 'Anapamu Street' / 'Old Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge HWY 101 Nb' / 'Castillo Street' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 154' / 'La Colina Rd' -
Bridge Bridge 'State Route 154' / 'Primavera Rd' -
Bridge Bridge 'Hollister Avenue' / 'Tecolotito Creek' - Bridge Bridge 'Arrellaga Street' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'De La Vina St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Islay St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Bath St' / 'Mission Creek' -
Bridge Bridge 'Matthews Street' / 'San Pedro Creek' -
Government Buses/Vehicles -
Train Depot Southern Pacific Train Depot 209 State Street -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
86 February 2023
Figure 6-2. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities and Earthquake Groundshaking Potential (Red Mountain Fault 7.4 Magnitude ShakeMap)

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 87
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Figure 6-3. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities and Liquefaction Potential

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
88 February 2023

6.3 FLOOD
The geographical location, climate, and topography of the South Coast make some areas of the City prone to flooding, particularly near the coastline and low-lying creek corridors. Flooding presents a hazard to development in floodplains. In addition to the damage to properties, flooding can also cut off access to utilities, emergency services, transportation, and may impact the overall economic well-being of an area. Emergency response can be interrupted by damaged roads and infrastructure. Fire can break out as a result of dysfunctional electrical equipment. Hazardous materials can also get into floodways, causing health concerns and polluted water supplies. During a flood, the drinking water supply can be contaminated. Climate change is expected to increase the frequency and intensity of heavy rainstorms that cause riverine flooding.

Based on the GIS analysis conducted for the 2022 MJHMP, the City has 1,792 improved parcels valued at over $1.9 billion in the 1-percent annual chance floodplain. Based on this analysis, which accounts for residents only and not workers, 3,339 residents are living in the 1-percent annual chance floodplain throughout the City. An additional 515 improved parcels and over $564 million in value fall within the 0.2-percent annual chance floodplain. Areas of the City vulnerable to the

0.2-percent annual chance riverine flood are home to 1,063 residents. Development in the 0.2- percent annual chance floodplain is typically not regulated, thus a large flood event could be extremely damaging in the City. This information is summarized in Table 6-7 below.

Table 6-7. City of Santa Barbara FEMA Floodplain Exposure and Loss Property Type Improved Parcel
Count Total Value Estimated Loss Population
Riverine 1% Annual Chance Floodplain Exposure and Loss
Commercial 238 $503,338,458 $125,834,615
3,339
Exempt 20 $60,896,806 $15,224,202
Industrial 166 $242,179,170 $60,544,793
Mixed Use 23 $81,217,906 $20,304,477
Residential 1,340 $1,031,372,627 $257,843,157
Improved Vacant 5 $2,968,766 $742,192
Total 1% Chance 1,792 $1,921,973,733 $480,493,433
Riverine 0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain Exposure and Loss Commercial 73 $147,840,838 $36,960,210
1,063
Exempt 5 $27,790,650 $6,947,663
Industrial 3 $80,753,765 $20,188,441
Mixed Use 5 $30,479,344 $7,619,836
Residential 429 $277,449,645 $69,362,411
Total 0.2% Chance 515 $564,314,242 $141,078,561
Total Flood Hazard 2,307 $2,486,287,975 $624,571,994 4,403 As listed in Table 6-8, 79 critical facilities in the City with a total value of $2,034,893 would be vulnerable to damage or destruction from 1-percent or 0.2-percent annual chance flood (Figure 6- 4; see also, Section 6.3.3, Flood of the 2022 MJHMP).

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 89
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Table 6-8. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities at Risk to Flood Hazard Type Critical Facility FEMA Flood Chance
Total
Building
Value
Utilities Sheffield Pump Station 1% Chance -
Utilities Laguna Pump Station 1% Chance -
Water District Goleta West Water District 1% Chance -
Water Treatment Plant Charles E. Meyer Main Desalination Plant 1% Chance - Water Treatment Plant SCADA / MCC Building 1% Chance -
Clinic Vista Del Monte Sunridge SNF 1% Chance -
Clinic Mission Terrace Convalescent Hospital 0.2% Chance - Clinic Sansum Clinic- Ob/ Gyn 1% Chance -
Nursing Home Vista Del Monte 1% Chance -
Nursing Home Mission Terrace Convalescent Hospital 0.2% Chance - Veteran Services Sb Veterans Memorial Bldg. 1% Chance $2,034,893 Airport Patrol Santa Barbara Airport Patrol 1% Chance - Education Santa Barbara Junior High 1% Chance -
Education Providence-SBCS 1% Chance -
Education El Montecito School San Roque 1% Chance -
Fire Station Fire Training 1% Chance -
Fire Station Airport Fire Station 8 1% Chance -
Government Public Works Yard 1% Chance -
Government Admin Well Corp. at Parks Department 1% Chance - Government Parks And Recreation 1% Chance -
Historic Site Hastings Adobe 1% Chance -
Historic Site Los Banos Del Mar 1% Chance -
Historic Site Burton Mound 1% Chance -
Airport Santa Barbara Airport 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 0.2% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 0.2% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
90 February 2023
Type Critical Facility FEMA Flood Chance
Total
Building
Value
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 0.2% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 0.2% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Airport Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Bridge Bridge 1% Chance -
Train Depot Southern Pacific Train Depot 1% Chance -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 91
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Figure 6-4. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities in FEMA Flood Hazard Zones

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
92 February 2023

6.4 TSUNAMI
Based on the GIS analysis conducted for the 2022 MJHMP, the City has 890 improved parcels valued at over $1.3 billion in the tsunami hazard zone. Based on this analysis, which accounts for residents only and not workers, 1,580 residents are living in the tsunami hazard zone throughout the City. This information is summarized in Table 6-9 below and depicted in Figure 6-5.

Table 6-9. City of Santa Barbara at Risk to Tsunami Hazard Property Type Improved Parcel Count Total Value Population Commercial 113 $225,256,702
Exempt 4 $12,479,014
Industrial 128 $186,632,753
Mixed Use 7 $12,260,718 17
Residential 638 $951,704,762 1,563
Improved Vacant 3 $1,794,022
Total 890 $1,388,333,948 1,580
As listed in Table 6-10, 23 critical facilities in the City would be vulnerable to damage or destruction from tsunami inundation (See also, Section 6.3.9, Tsunami of the 2022 MJHMP).

Table 6-10. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities Vulnerable to Tsunami Type Name Total Building Value
Utilities Laguna Pump Station -
Water Treatment Plant Charles E. Meyer Main Desalination Plant - Water Treatment Plant Scada / Mcc Building -
Water Treatment Plant El Estero Water Resources Center - Veteran Services Sb Veterans Memorial Bldg. $2,034,893
Fire Station Fire Training -
Fire Station Fire Station 2 -
Harbor Patrol Santa Barbara Waterfront Harbor Patrol -
Historic Site Los Banos Del Mar -
Historic Site Burton Mound -
Airport Santa Barbara Airport -
Bridge Bridge -
Bridge Bridge -
Bridge Bridge -
Bridge Bridge -
Bridge Bridge -
Bridge Bridge -
Bridge Bridge -
Bridge Bridge -
Bridge Bridge -
Bridge Bridge -
Bridge Bridge -
Bridge Bridge -
Bridge Bridge -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 93
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Figure 6-5. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities in Tsunami Hazard Zone

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
94 February 2023

6.5 DAM FAILURE
Lauro Dam is of the largest concern to the City of Santa Barbara. Failure of Lauro Dam would inundate portions of the City with relatively little evacuation time. Based on the GIS analysis conducted for the 2022 MJHMP, in Santa Barbara, 1,224 properties with a total value of $808 million are vulnerable to the catastrophic flooding that would occur if Lauro Dam failed.

Approximately 2,754 residents within the inundation zone may need to be evacuated, cared for, and possibly permanently relocated. This information is summarized in Table 6-11 below.

Table 6-11. City of Santa Barbara at Risk to Dam Inundation Hazard Property Type Improved Parcel Count Total Value Population Commercial 88 $133,647,498
Exempt 11 $57,291,886
Industrial 1 $163,005
Mixed Use 1 $919,448 2
Residential 1,123 $616,614,786 2,751
Total 1,224 $808,636,623 2,754
As listed in Table 6-12, 21 critical facilities in the City would be vulnerable to damage or destruction from dam inundation (Figure 6-6; see also, Section 6.6.3, Dam Failure of the 2022 MJHMP). All but one of these facilities would be affected by the failure of the Lauro Dam. One bridge would be affected by the failure of the Glen Annie Dam.

Table 6-12. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities Vulnerable to Inundation from Dam Failure Type Name Dam Name Total Building
Value
Clinic Vista Del Monte Sunridge SNF Lauro -
Nursing Home VISTA DEL MONTE Lauro -
Education PEABODY CHARTER Lauro -
Education PROVIDENCE-SBCS Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Glen Annie -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -
Bridge Bridge Lauro -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 95
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Figure 6-6. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities in Dam Inundation Zone

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
96 February 2023

6.6 LANDSLIDE
As described in Section 5.3.9, Landslides, landslides are most common on steep slopes made of loose soil and other material such as those found in the City, but they can also happen on shallower slopes.

The City has 9,925 improved parcels that lie within Class 5, 7, 8, 9, or 10 landslide hazard zones, amounting to $7.6 billion and home to 23,758 residents.

Table 6-13. City of Santa Barbara Improved Properties at Risk to Landslide Summary Class 5
Parcel
County
Class 7
Parcel
Count
Class 8
Parcel
Count
Class 9
Parcel
Count
Class 10
Parcel
Count
Total
Improved
Parcel
Count
Total Value Population
10 6,961 16 1,551 1,387 9,925 $7,652,734,542 23,758
Further, as listed in Table 6-14, 40 critical facilities in the City would be vulnerable to damage or destruction from landslides (Figure 6-7; see also, Section 6.3.7, Landslide of the 2022 MJHMP).

Table 6-14. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities Vulnerable to Landslide Type Name Landslide Severity
Class
Total Building
Value
Reservoir Escondido Pump Station and Reservoir 7 -
Utilities Sheffield Pump Station 7 -
Utilities Skofield Pump Station 7 -
Water Treatment Plant Cater Water Treatment Plant 7 -
Clinic Valle Verde Health Facility- SNF 7 -
Clinic La Cumbre Senior Living Concepts 7 -
Clinic Sansum Clinic-Hitchcock 7 -
Clinic Samarkand- Smith Center- SNF 7 -
Nursing Home Alto Lucero Transitional Care 7 -
Nursing Home Samarkand Of Santa Barbara 7 -
Nursing Home Wood Glen Hall, Inc. 7 -
Nursing Home Valle Verde Health Facility 7 -
Nursing Home Alexander Gardens 9 -
Nursing Home Mission Terrace Convalescent Hospital 7 -
Nursing Home Villa Riviera 9 -
Nursing Home Mountain House 7 -
Colleges / Universities Santa Barbara City College 7 -
Education Roosevelt Elementary 7 -
Education Open Alternative 9 -
Education Monroe Elementary 7 -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 97
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Type Name Landslide Severity
Class
Total Building
Value
Education Adams Elementary 7 -
Education La Colina Junior High 7 -
Education Cleveland Elementary 9 -
Education Eureka School of Santa Barbara 7 -
Fire Station Fire Station 6 7 -
Fire Station Fire Station 3 7 -
Fire Station Fire Station 7 7 -
Historic Site Los Banos Del Mar 7 -
Bridge Bridge 7 -
Bridge Bridge 7 -
Bridge Bridge 7 -
Bridge Bridge 7 -
Bridge Bridge 7 -
Bridge Bridge 7 -
Bridge Bridge 7 -
Bridge Bridge 7 -
Bridge Bridge 9 -
Bridge Bridge 7 -
Bridge Bridge 9 -
Bridge Bridge 7 -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
98 February 2023
Figure 6-7. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities within Landslide Susceptibility Zones

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 99
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

6.7 COASTAL HAZARDS
In 2021 the City approved a Sea Level Rise Adaption Plan and Vulnerability Assessment that quantifies the exposure of identified assets and resources to projected future coastal flood and erosion hazards. The purpose of the Sea Level Rise Adaption Plan and Vulnerability Assessment is to identify vulnerabilities to coastal hazards expected from sea-level rise in the City of Santa Barbara and possible actions to prepare for and adapt to sea-level rise. The plan can be found at www.SantaBarbaraca.gov/slr and is hereby incorporated by reference into this plan.

The City’s 2021 Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan and Vulnerability Assessment only included the main portion of the City and not the Airport and Goleta Slough. Sea level rise vulnerabilities at the Airport and Goleta Slough area were analyzed as part of the 2015 Goleta Slough Area Sea Level Rise And Management Plan. An updated vulnerability assessment and sea level rise adaptation plan is currently being developed for the City’s Airport area.

The following analysis is based on the Santa Barbara County Climate Vulnerability Assessment to be consistent with the methodology contained for the greater Santa Barbara County MultiJurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Based on the MJHMP’s analysis, approximately 100 acres of the City are susceptible to coastal hazards and sea level rise by 2030 (10.2 inches) and 145 acres by 2060 (27.2 inches). Based on the GIS analysis conducted for the 2022 MJHMP, the City has 1,014 improved parcels valued at over $1,6 billion in sea level rise coastal hazard zones. Based on this analysis, which accounts for residents only and not workers, 1,436 residents are living in this hazard zone within the City.

Table 6-15. City of Santa Barbara at Risk to Sea Level Rise Coastal Hazards by Property Type Property Type Improved Parcel
Count Total Value Population
2030 Sea Level Rise
Commercial 84 $187,609,824
Exempt 3 $618,954
Industrial 98 $143,146,390
Mixed Use 5 $21,117,388 12
Residential 231 $340,247,270 566
Improved Vacant 1 $68,994
Total 422 $692,808,820 578
2060 Sea Level Rise
Commercial 109 $236,143,706
Exempt 5 $926,740
Industrial 126 $213,313,565
Mixed Use 13 $48,788,222 32
Residential 337 $464,798,276 826
Improved Vacant 2 $657,114
Total 592 $964,627,623 858
Total Sea Level Rise Hazard 1,014 $1,657,436,442 1,436

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
100 February 2023
Additionally, 14 critical facilities area vulnerable to damage or destruction from coastal hazards and sea level rise by 2030, and 19 critical facilities are vulnerable by 2060 (Table 6-16) (Figure 6-8; see also, Section 6.3.6, Coastal Hazards of the 2022 MJHMP).

Table 6-16. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities Vulnerable to Coastal Hazards Type Name 2030 2060
Total
Building
Value
Utilities Laguna Pump Station Yes Yes -
Water District Goleta West Water District No Yes -
Water Treatment Plant Charles E. Meyer Main Desalination Plant No Yes - Water Treatment Plant Scada / Mcc Building No Yes -
Government Public Works Yard Yes Yes -
Government Admin Well Corp. at Parks Department Yes Yes - Government Parks And Recreation Yes Yes -
Harbor Patrol Santa Barbara Waterfront Harbor Patrol Yes Yes - Airport Santa Barbara Airport Yes Yes -
Bridge Bridge Yes Yes -
Bridge Bridge Yes Yes -
Bridge Bridge Yes Yes -
Bridge Bridge No Yes -
Bridge Bridge Yes Yes -
Bridge Bridge Yes Yes -
Bridge Bridge Yes Yes -
Bridge Bridge No Yes -
Bridge Bridge Yes Yes -
Bridge Bridge Yes Yes -

6.0. Vulnerability Assessment
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 101
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Figure 6-8. City of Santa Barbara Critical Facilities in Sea Level Rise Coastal Hazard Zones

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
102 February 2023

7.0 MITIGATION STRATEGY
In preparation for the 2022 LHMP update, the City’s LPT made no revisions to the countywide goals and objectives because they continue to reflect the needs of the City; see also, Chapter 7.0, Mitigation Plan of the 2022 MJHMP. This section contains the City’s updated and most current mitigation strategy as of 2022.

7.1 MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The City’s LPT developed the following goals and objectives for the 2022 update. These goals and objectives represent a vision of long-term hazard reduction or enhancement of capabilities. These preliminary goals, objectives, and actions were developed to represent a vision of long-term hazard reduction or enhancement of capabilities. To help further the development of these goals and objectives, the LPT compiled and reviewed current jurisdictional sources, including the City’s planning documents, codes, and ordinances, and specifically discussed hazard-related goals, objectives, and actions as they related to the overall LHMP.

The updated goals and objectives of this plan are:

Goal 1: Promote disaster-resistant development and strive to minimize the risks of hazards Objective 1A: Minimize development in known hazard areas. When development must be sited in hazardous areas, minimize the impacts of hazards through hazard-resistant designs or phasing of development based on degree of hazard.

Objective 1B: Minimize hazard frequency, severity, and risks through mitigation projects and programs.

Objective 1C: Continue to assess hazards in the City based on best available science and information.

Goal 2: Prioritize hazard mitigation for critical facilities and community assets Objective 2A: Plan for redundancy of critical services and infrastructure (energy, transportation, water supply) in the event of a hazard.

Objective 2B: Implement hazard mitigation projects for critical facilities, public transportation systems, and public services that are essential for basic city functions. Upgrade and replace aging critical facilities and infrastructure.

Objective 2C: Promote mitigation projects that have co-benefits and that minimize impacts to existing development, the local economy, natural resources, community and historical assets, and the public shoreline, parks, open spaces, and recreation areas.

Objective 2D: Promote mitigation projects that benefit or minimize impacts to vulnerable populations that may have a higher sensitivity and lower adaptive capacity to hazards.

Objective 2E: Promote mitigation projects and programs that respond to climate change and build resiliency partnerships and coordination locally, regionally, and statewide.

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 103
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Goal 3: Actively promote understanding, support, and funding for hazard mitigation by participating agencies and the public.

Objective 3.A: Engage, inform, and educate the public on tools and resources to improve community resilience to hazards, reduce vulnerability, and increase awareness and support of hazard mitigation activities.

Objective 3.B: Ensure effective outreach and communications to vulnerable and disadvantaged communities.

Objective 3.C: Increase awareness and encourage the incorporation of hazard mitigation principles and practice among public, private, and nonprofit sectors, including all participating agencies.

Objective 3.D: Ensure interagency coordination and joint partnerships with the County, cities, state, tribal, and federal governments.

Objective 3.E: Continuously improve the City’s capability and efficiency at administering preand post-disaster mitigation programs.

Objective 3.F: Monitor and publicize the effectiveness of mitigation actions implemented in the City.

Objective 3.G: Position the City to apply for and receive grant funding from FEMA and other sources.

Goal 4: Promote community resilience to hazard events
Objective 4A: Integrate hazard mitigation with public policy and standard business practices.

Objective 4B: Create community resilience plans and resource hubs Objective 4C: Incentivize resilience actions in the community.

Goal 5: Minimize the risks to life and property associated with urban and human-caused hazards Objective 5A: Minimize risks from biological hazards, including disease, invasive species, and agricultural pests.

Objective 5B: Be prepared and respond to urban hazards, including terrorism, cyber threats, and civil disturbance.

Objective 5C: Minimize risks from energy production, including hazardous oil and gas activities.

Goal 6: Update and improve emergency response planning and programs Objective 6A: Provide effective life safety measures and reduce property loss.

Objective 6B: Ensure rapid resumption of basic City services after an emergency.

Objective 6C: Accurately document and record response efforts to ensure cost recovery.

Goal 7: Prepare to adapt and recover from the impacts of climate change and ensure regional resiliency.

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
104 February 2023
Objective 7A: Promote projects and programs that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, utilize carbon free energy, and reduce the potential of further impacts from climate change Objective 7B: Identify, assess, and prepare for the impacts of climate change.

Objective 7C: Use the latest climate science to implement hazard mitigation strategies in response to climate change.

7.2 MITIGATION PROGRESS
Since 2017, the City has incorporated the LHMP goals, objectives, and mitigation actions into its local plans and processes, including the General Plan Safety Element by reference, specific hazard planning efforts (e.g., Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan), the City’s grant pursuits, and capital improvement planning. Ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the LHMP by the City ensured mitigations are implemented and tracked. Key mitigation actions completed since 2017 include improving the resilience of coastal structures, including Stearns Wharf and Mesa Lane and 1,000 Steps Coastal Access, beginning upgrades to the Laguna Pump Station and the Santa Barbara Police Station, and completing the Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan and Vulnerability Assessment.

The City’s LPT reviewed the mitigation actions listed in the 2017 LHMP to determine the status of each action. Once reviewed, deferred projects from 2017 were renumbered to reflect 2022 updates (see Table 7-1).

Table 7-1. Status of City of Santa Barbara Previous Mitigation Actions Mitigation
Action
No.

Mitigation Action
Description Status Comments In 2022 Update?
2016‐1 Pedregosa Storm
Drain Deferred Construction will significantly reduce flooding in the Mission Creek area around Pedregosa X 2016‐2
Replacement Storm
Drain Outfall
(Airport)
Canceled
Previously from 2011 – This project is planned but
not budgeted. Will significantly reduce flooding on
Hollister Avenue.
2016‐3 Flood Wall
Construction (Airport) Deferred
Flood Wall Construction - Around buildings 223,
304, 314, and 315 to protect these structures from
flooding. Eliminate frequent water intrusion into
buildings and subsequent clean-up costs due to
storm events, many of which are less than 10-year
events.

X
2016‐4
Honda Valley
Hillside Stabilization
in a location of HighPressure Gas Line
Serving City
Deferred
A high-pressure gas line serving the City is located
in an area of Honda Valley where stabilization of
soil is needed.

X
2016‐5 Hidden Valley Park
Slope Stability Deferred To reduce risk to life and property from slides and flooding. X 2016‐6
Stevens Park Eastern
Access Erosion
Remediation
Deferred
A benefit to secure life and property and the
preservation of an effective and ecologically sound
creek system.

X
2016‐7 Francheschi
Park/Mission Ridge Deferred Deferred due to lack of funding – a retaining wall is crucial to evacuation and emergency response. X

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 105
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation
Action
No.

Mitigation Action
Description Status Comments In 2022 Update?
Hillside geotechnical
stabilization of
retaining wall
2016‐8
Bluff Retreat
Management at
Shoreline Park
Deferred Deferred due to lack of funding – This project is ongoing due to continuous bluff erosion. X
2016‐9
Rehabilitate Coastal
Access Stairs at
1000 Steps
In Progress In DART Process. Rehabilitation of damaged steps and drainage improvements anticipated in 2022. X
2016‐10 New Police
Department In Progress PD Station funding through Measure C and potential bond X 2016‐11 High Fire Area
Roadways Deferred
Previously from 2011 - Erosions and landslides due
to steep slopes and unreinforced retaining walls
will hamper evacuation and emergency response.

Renamed to Unreinforced Retaining Walls and
Unstable Slopes project
X
2016‐12 Laguna Pump Station In Progress The project is currently being funding by FEMA Mitigation Grant Funding – 2023 X
2016‐13
Replace deluge
system on Stearns
Wharf
Completed
Continues to be an ongoing maintenance Project to
promote firefighting on Stearns Wharf, which is a
historical site in the Waterfront area.
2016‐14
Backup generator
for Waterfront
Department
Operating Center.

Completed Upgraded power needed for Harbor Patrol and
Waterfront DOC.
2016‐15
Current Harbor
facilities are old
early 60s type
construction – seismic
renovation needed
for safety
Deferred
Current Harbor facilities are early 60s type
construction that would not withstand a large
earthquake. Seismic evaluation is needed.

X
2016‐16 Mesa Lane Coastal
Access Completed
The lowest portion of the Mesa Lane steps was
replaced in 2012. Replacement of the upper
portion is deferred.
2016-17
Salsipuedes Street
Storm Drain
Improvement
Deferred
Potential improvements include the connection of
storm drain inlets on Micheltorena Street to the
existing storm drain on Salsipuedes Street and the
construction of a new storm drain pipe along
Salsipuedes and Victoria Streets. Pipes continue to
be identified; funding for the project is from
Measure C
X
2016 -18 Corrugated Metal
Pipe Repairs Deferred
Repair through slip lining or completely replace the
highest priority corrugated metal pipe drain lines
annually. Pipes are being identified; funding for
the project is from Measure C.

X
2016-19 Gutierrez Storm
Drain Improvements Canceled
Construct additional storm drains to reduce the
duration and severity of flooding when the
upstream storm drain system is overwhelmed. The
project is intended to improve the ability to remove
runoff from the area by providing increased inlet

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
106 February 2023
Mitigation
Action
No.

Mitigation Action
Description Status Comments In 2022 Update?
capacity and by providing larger conduits
between the street inlets and the box culverts
under Hwy 101.

Current funding for the project with Hazard
Mitigation Grant
2016-20 Goleta Slough Mouth
Management Deferred
The project will control the water level in the
Goleta Slough to minimize flood hazards, mosquito
population blooms, and waterfowl attractants that
pose a greater bird-strike risk. The project will be
designed to minimize adverse effects to the
Federally endangered tidewater goby and
steelhead trout, while avoiding significant flood
and bird-strike hazards such as those experienced
in November 2012, May 2013, and February
2014.

Currently waiting on Federal environmental
regulators
X
2016-21 Hollister Drainage
Improvement Deferred
The project includes establishing new swales to
connect to an existing culvert emptying to Carneros
Creek. To preserve the wetland habitat within the
project site, the swales will be “eco-channels” which
are constructed to allow a certain depth of water
to still fill the wetlands but now allow the water to
overflow into Hollister Avenue. There will be a
significant component of wetland
enhancement/planting to offset any detrimental
impacts of the project to the wetland habitat.

Continued wetland disruption.

X
2016-22 Sea Level Rise
Adaptation Plan Completed Comprehensive Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan completed in 2021. 2016-23
Review/Revise the
City’s Critical
Facilities List
In Progress
Develop a more comprehensive list of Critical
Facilities that would include hospitals, skilled
nursing facilities, and private companies; as
applicable.

X

7.3 MITIGATION APPROACH
A simplified Benefit-Cost Review was applied to both deferred and new mitigation actions to prioritize the mitigation recommendations for implementation. The priority for implementing mitigation recommendations depends upon the overall cost-effectiveness of the recommendation when considering monetary and non-monetary costs and benefits associated with each action.

Additionally, the following questions were considered when developing the Benefit-Cost Review:
• How many people will benefit from the action?
• How large an area is impacted?
• How critical are the facilities that benefit from the action? • Environmentally, does it make sense to do this project for the overall community?

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 107
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 7.4, Implementation Plan provides a benefit-cost review for each mitigation recommendation, as well as a relative priority rank (High, Medium, and Low) based upon the judgment of the Planning Team. The general category guidelines are listed below:
• High – Benefits are perceived to exceed costs without further study or evaluation • Medium – Benefits are perceived to exceed costs but may require further study or evaluation before implementation
• Low – Benefits and costs evaluation requires additional evaluation before implementation Discussion of the rationale for these priorities is included in the mitigation action descriptions below.

7.4 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
2022-1. Pedregosa Storm Drain
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy
Description
This storm drain was recorded as part of the Storm Drain System Data Collection and Inspection Services, Phase 2. The City retrieved a Pipeline Assessment Certification Program ranking on portions of this storm drain. The City is determining the priority and scope of repair for this known drainage issue. Additional video of the pipe will be necessary following a storm drain clearing effort as the first camera was unable to traverse debris in certain areas.

Relevant Objective Reducing significant flooding
Applicable Hazards Flood
Estimated Timeline for
Completion 2030
Estimated
Cost/Funding Source Measure C/Streets Capital Fund – estimated cost of project $700,000 Responsible
Agency/Department Public Works – Streets Division
Other Comments Adapted from 2016-1 in the 2016 LHMP
2022-2. Honda Valley Hillside Stabilization
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Honda Valley Hillside Stabilization in a location of High-Pressure Gas line Serving the City.

An area near a roadway and private property where high-pressure gas lines are buried erodes frequently due to runoff and the steepness of the slope. This necessitates stabilization of the continually eroding hillside containing the gas line. An engineering consultant would prepare plans for slope stabilization and native revegetation, and infrastructure relocation if necessary.

Identify Funding
Prepare scope of work
Hire consultation firm to design job

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
108 February 2023
Acquire all necessary permits.

Write Specifications
Bid construction
Construct project
Relevant Objective
The benefits of public safety and a secure utility delivery would outweigh the likely financial costs of planning and implementation of a slope stabilization project.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, Landslide/Coastal Erosion
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2026
Estimated Cost/Funding Source
The benefits of public safety and a secure utility delivery would outweigh the likely financial costs of planning and implementation of a slope stabilization project.

Responsible Agency/Department Parks & Recreation – Parks Division Other Comments
City of Santa Barbara Parks and Recreation Department working with City of Santa Barbara Public Works and the Gas Company
Adapted from 2016-4 in the 2016 LHMP
2022-3. Hidden Valley Park Slope Stability
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
At numerous locations throughout the park, slope stability problems are reoccurring along steep creek banks causing public safety hazards from slides and flooding, as well as stability issues on private and public property that lines the park. Potential hazards to park users and public and private economic losses would be reduced if the slopes were stabilized.

Identify Funding
Hire consultation firm to design job
Acquire all necessary permits.

Write Specifications
Bid construction
Construct project
Relevant Objective Reduced risk to life and property from slides and flooding would outweigh likely fiscal costs.

Applicable Hazards Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2026
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Funding has not been specified Responsible Agency/Department Parks & Recreation – Parks Division Other Comments
City of Santa Barbara Parks and Recreation working with County of Santa
Barbara Flood Control and City of Santa Barbara Creeks Division.

Adapted from 2016-5 in the 2016 LHMP

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 109
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022-4. Stevens Park Eastern Access Erosion Remediation Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The sole emergency access point to the majority of Stevens Park is subject to severe erosion, undercutting, potential slope failure, and substantial sedimentation into San Rogue Creek from storm damage and poor drainage. To reduce the hazard to life and property from slides and flooding and to maintain a functional flood control system the area must be repaired employing bank stabilization, revegetation, and appropriate drainage control.

Identify Funding
Prepare scope of work
Hire consultation firm to design job
Acquire all necessary permits.

Write Specifications
Bid construction
Construct project
Relevant Objective
The benefit of secure life and property and the preservation of an effective and ecologically sound creek system would outweigh the likely fiscal costs.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, Landslide/Coastal Erosion
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2024
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Funding has not been specified Responsible Agency/Department Parks & Recreation – Parks Division Other Comments
The benefit of secure life and property and the preservation of an effective and ecologically sound creek system would outweigh the likely fiscal costs.

Adapted from 2016-6 in the 2016 LHMP
2022-5. Francheschi Park/Mission Ridge Hillside Geotechnical Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Francheschi Park/Mission Ridge Hillside geotechnical stabilization of retaining wall
Improve storm drain infrastructure improvements
Relevant Objective Retaining wall is crucial to ingress and egress in the area; especially for evacuation and emergency response
Applicable Hazards Flooding, Landslide/Coastal Erosion
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Funding has not been specified Responsible Agency/Department Parks & Recreation – Parks Division Other Comments Adapted from 2016-7 in the 2016 LHMP

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
110 February 2023
2022-6. Bluff Retreat Management at Shoreline Park
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Since the late ’90s, the Park’s bluff has been subject to numerous slides.

Management of sidewalks and parkway needs to be continually addressed.

Relevant Objective
Currently, the erosion of the park continues and will continue. Keeping the management of sidewalks and vegetation in the area is an ongoing issue.

Applicable Hazards Sea Level Rise, Landslide Coastal Erosion, Tsunami Estimated Timeline for Completion 2028
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Currently an unfunded project Responsible Agency/Department Parks & Recreation – Parks Division Public Works - Engineering
Other Comments Adapted from 2016-8 in the 2016 LHMP
2022-7. Rehabilitate Coastal Stairs at 1000 Steps
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Coastal erosion to the access on the beach has been ongoing. The lower portion of the stairway needs to be rebuilt to maintain coastal access for first responders at this location.

Relevant Objective
Civil engineering plans are completed and permitting is in the process as of summer 2019. Construction is anticipated to be completed in summer 2022.

Applicable Hazards Sea Level Rise, Landslide/Coastal Erosion, Tsunami Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $800,000
Responsible Agency/Department Parks & Recreation – Parks Division Public Works - Engineering
Other Comments Adapted from 2016-9 in the 2016 LHMP
2022-8. New Police Department
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description The police building has been assessed by an outside architectural firm and has been determined that the building needs seismic renovation.

Relevant Objective Critical facility seismic renovation Applicable Hazards Earthquake
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2026
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Measure C Funding and potential bond will assist in funding the new Police Department - $96,000,000
Responsible Agency/Department Police Department
Community Development – Planning Division
Other Comments Adapted from 2016-10 in the 2016 LHMP

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 111
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022-9. Unreinforced Retaining Walls and Unstable Slopes Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Many steep-sloped areas are subject to erosion and have already partially failed in areas due to past flooding events. Gravity and unreinforced retaining walls subject to landslides, earthquakes, and fires are at a higher risk of failing in an emergency event.

Reinforcement and replacement of the walls would protect infrastructure, access, and the residents of the Riviera. The City is determining whether an unreinforced wall on Marilyn Way is a good fit for LHP.

Relevant Objective
Erosions and landslides will hamper emergency responders from accessing these high fire areas and will drastically slow down calls times if these roads are hampered.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, Wildfire, Landslide/Coastal Erosion Estimated Timeline for Completion 2036
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $30,000,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works, Engineering Fire Dept., Fire Prevention Bureau, Wildland Specialist Other Comments Adapted from 2016-11 in the 2016 LHMP
2022-10. Seismic Upgrades to City Facility in the Harbor Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description Current Harbor facilities are old early 60s type construction – seismic renovation needed for safety
Relevant Objective Critical Facility needing seismic upgrades for safety Applicable Hazards Earthquake
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2032
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $5 Million
Responsible Agency/Department Waterfront – Operations Division Public Works – Engineering Division
Other Comments Adapted from 2016-15 in the 2016 LHMP
2022-11. Salsipuedes Street Storm Drain Improvements
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The project first involves the study of existing public and private storm drain facilities beginning on Salsipuedes Street at Micheltorena Street and continuing south to Victoria Street. Potential improvements include the connection of storm drain inlets on Micheltorena Street to an existing storm drain on Salsipuedes Street and the construction of a new storm drain pipe along Salsipuedes and Victoria Streets.

Relevant Objective
Public Works will pursue the completion of an initial study and design for this project if grant funding or a cost-sharing agreement with County Flood Control can be secured to cover 50% of the cost for construction.

Applicable Hazards Flooding

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
112 February 2023
Priority: High
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2035
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $1,500,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Engineering Division Other Comments Adapted from 2016-17 in the 2016 LHMP
2022-12. Corrugated Metal Pipe Repairs
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Studies done in several areas within the City noted many corrugated metal pipes would need to be replaced. This project would seek to repair through slip lining, spiral wound lining, or replacement of the highest priority corrugated metal pipe drain lines.

Relevant Objective
Many of the City-owned corrugated metal pipes were installed over 50 years ago and may require replacement. Due to the lack of funding for this project, repairs are typically only completed as emergency maintenance projects in response to failures evident at the street level (typically as sinkholes following rain events). 2019 – Currently pipes are being identified. The City will review findings from an ongoing Pipeline Assessment Certification Program and create a replacement plan
Applicable Hazards Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2028
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Measure C Funding - $20,000,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Engineering Division Other Comments Adapted from 2016-18 in the 2016 LHMP
2022-13. Goleta Slough Mouth Management
Priority: Medium
Mitigation Strategy Description
This project will control the water level in the Goleta Slough to minimize flood hazards, mosquito population blooms, and waterfowl attractants that pose a greater bird-strike risk. This project will be designed to minimize adverse effects to the Federally endangered tidewater goby and steelhead trout, while avoiding significant flood and bird-strike hazards such as those experienced in November 2012, May 2013, and February 2014.

Relevant Objective
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires that wildlife strike risk be avoided to the maximum extent feasible within environmental constraints. The Santa Barbara County Flood Control District completed an Environmental Impact Report for their maintenance activities, including slough mouth management in 2011.
2019 – Continue to work with environmental regulators.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, Sea Level Rise, Agricultural Pests/Disease, Commercial Aircraft
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2030
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Discussion with the County regarding potential mitigations. Funding sources include funding from FAA and the Airport. - $300,000

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 113
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Priority: Medium
Responsible Agency/Department Airport – Operations Division Public Works – Engineering Division
Other Comments Adapted from 2016-20 in the 2016 LHMP
2022-14. Hollister Drainage Improvement
Priority: Medium
Mitigation Strategy Description
The project includes establishing new swales to connect to an existing culvert emptying to Carneros Creek. To preserve the wetland habitat within the project site, the swales will be “eco-channels” which are constructed to allow a certain depth of water to still fill the wetlands but now allow the water to overflow into Hollister Avenue. There will be a significant component of wetland enhancement/planting to offset any detrimental impacts of the project to the wetland habitat.

Relevant Objective
Hollister Avenue is an important access route to the Airport and needs to remain a safe and dependable route to the Airport in moderate and heavy rains. The project is consistent with Public Works Engineering standards that require roads to be adequately drained during a 10-year storm.
2019 – Not planned due to mitigating wetland disruptions.

Applicable Hazards Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2030
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Airport Project funding - $500,000 Responsible Agency/Department Airport – Operations Division Other Comments
The area south of Hollister Avenue and east and west of Los Carneros Way is twelve-acre moisture of upland and wetland habitats. The area is drained by several poorly defined swales, which have not been maintained for many years. In moderate storm events (3–5-year storms), the swales, which are severely choked by bulrush, back up with storm runoff and flood over Hollister Avenue. The depth of water on Hollister Avenue is as much as 12 inches and the road has to be closed for safety reasons.

Adapted from 2016-21 in the 2016 LHMP
2022-15. Review/Revise City’s Critical Facilities List
Priority: Medium
Mitigation Strategy Description
Develop a more comprehensive list of Critical Facilities that would include hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and private companies; as applicable.

Relevant Objective
To have a comprehensive Hazard Mitigation Plan, the City will need to develop a critical infrastructure list that includes outside agencies and businesses, such as hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, dialysis clinics, etc.

Applicable Hazards All
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source In-Kind staff cost
Responsible Agency/Department Finance – Risk Management

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
114 February 2023
Priority: Medium
Community Development – Long Range Planning Division
Fire – Office of Emergency Services
Other Comments Adapted from 2016-23 in the 2016 LHMP
2022-16. Sycamore Creek Flood Control and Restoration Project Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The proposed project is an effort to prevent flooding in the Lower Eastside, relieve major flow constriction points, and improve overall flow capacity and system reliability. Work consists of several bridge replacements and channel widening, along with additional improvements to the entire lower reach of Sycamore Creek.

Relevant Objective
The list of undersized bridges includes Indio Muerto Street Bridge, Zoo Bridge, El Escorial Bridge, Railroad Bridge, and the Por La Mar Bridge.

The reaches between the bridges are also significantly undersized.

Applicable Hazards Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2032
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $50,000,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works - Streets Division Other Comments
2022-17. Parma Park Debris Basin
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The proposed project is an effort to prevent flooding and erosion along Sycamore Creek, its tributary areas, and downstream properties. Work consists of clearing debris and vegetation to restore the basin's capacity to its original conditions.

Relevant Objective Parma Park basin was impacted by the Thomas Fire and subsequent debris flows.

Applicable Hazards Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2030
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $5,000,000
Responsible Agency/Department Parks & Recreation – Parks Division Public Works – Streets Division
Other Comments
2022-18. Creeks Development Standards
Priority: Medium
Mitigation Strategy Description
Establish creek development standards for new development and redevelopment along the City’s creeks inland of the Coastal Zone and prepare or update guidelines for restoration, an increase of pervious surfaces, and appropriate land uses within designated creek buffers.

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 115
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Priority: Medium
Relevant Objective
Protection and restoration of creeks and their riparian corridors is a priority for flood control in conjunction with adaptation planning for climate change.

Applicable Hazards Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2030
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $100,000/Grant or General Fund Responsible Agency/Department Community Development – Long Range Planning Division Other Comments
Creek development standards, specifically numeric development setbacks, protect from flood, erosion, and geologic hazards and provide an area for habitat support. Numeric creek setbacks and buffer standards have been developed in the Coastal Land Use Plan for the Coastal Zone. This project would provide appropriate standards for the inland areas of the City. The policy direction for this project is found in the 2011 Environmental Resources Element and 2012 Climate Action Plan.
2022-19. Automatic Reservoir Isolations Valves
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The City’s 14 potable water reservoirs should be retrofitted with automatic isolation valves, which would shut in the event of a water main break caused by an earthquake or other force.

Relevant Objective
The reservoirs all range in capacity from 1 to 10 million gallons.

Retrofitting each reservoir with automatic isolation valves is important for protecting the City’s water supply from an earthquake event and also protecting surrounding structures from a flood event resulting from a free-flowing pipe from the reservoir.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $1,400,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-20. Automated Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Program Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The City currently manually reads its 27,000 meters monthly. In the event of a private property leak, a month might pass before the meter is read and the leak is noticed because of the high use registered by the meter.

Relevant Objective
AMI would provide the infrastructure to enable leak notification 24 hours within the leak incident, thus eliminating high amounts of water loss. AMI would be a significant tool for helping conserve water Citywide.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Wildfire, Drought
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
116 February 2023
Priority: High
Estimated Cost/Funding Source
This project is partially funded through the City’s Capital Program. In addition, the City has received a grant for $1,500,000 from the Federal Bureau of Reclamation for Phase II implementation.- $6,802,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
The City is nearing the completion of the installation of compatible meters. Pilot testing of a limited number of meters is complete. The City is starting Phase II which is the AMI Implementation Phase in which smart meter communication equipment will be installed, data storage created and, a customer interface set up. Once Phase II is complete, the project will be complete
2022-21. El Estero WRC – Chlorine Contact Chamber Bypass Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Many of the structural components are past their useful life, such as baffle walls, flow control gates, and monitoring devices. Upgrading the structure and equipment will reduce the risk of failure due to natural disasters, such as floods, earthquakes, fires, and associated power disruptions.

Relevant Objective
Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Sea Level Rise Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Wastewater Capital Funds - $1,500,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-22. El Estero WRC – New DAFT and GT
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Many of the structural components and equipment are past their useful life, such as weirs, rotating equipment, walkways, and stairs.

Upgrading the structure and equipment will reduce the risk of failure due to natural disasters, such as floods, earthquakes, fires, and associated power disruptions.

Relevant Objective Maintain human health and safety and preserve the environment Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Sea Level Rise Estimated Timeline for Completion 2026
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Wastewater Capital Funds - $6,400,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 117
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022-23. El Estero WRC – Digester Upgrades
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This project will result in a third digester being constructed. This third digester will reduce the risk of failure due to natural disasters that may subject the older digesters to failure.

Relevant Objective
A new digester will allow this critical wastewater treatment process to continue to operate during floods, earthquakes, and power failures due to wildfires. This new digester will also allow for El Estero to operate independently from Southern California Edison and the power grid during a natural disaster.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Sea Level Rise Estimated Timeline for Completion 2042
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Wastewater Capital Funds - $14,600,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-24. El Estero WRC – Electrical Distribution Upgrade Project Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The Electrical Distribution System Upgrade project will replace the substations and electrical equipment that is outdated and past useful life.

Relevant Objective
The new electrical substations and equipment will be designed with redundancy and features that will allow the important wastewater treatment facilities to run independently on internally generated power. This redundancy and power independence will allow the wastewater treatment process to be maintained during earthquakes, floods, and wildfires. The project is in the final design stage.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Sea Level Rise Estimated Timeline for Completion 2026
Estimated Cost/Funding Source SRF – $30,200,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-25. Community Resilience Plans and Hubs
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Develop community resilience plans including a comprehensive database of relief resources in the event of a disaster and neighborhood-level Community Resilience Hubs to improve initial emergency response, subsequent recovery, and ongoing selfsufficiency. Resilience hubs are community-serving facilities augmented to support residents, coordinate communication, distribute resources, and reduce carbon pollution while enhancing the quality of life. The plans will define, identify, and analyze the logistical and economic feasibility of Community Resilience Hubs and develop a comprehensive implementation and operations plan for several Community Resilience Hubs in the City. Execute elements needed for the resilience hubs,

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
118 February 2023
Priority: High
including but not limited to installing energy generation and storage, building upgrades, and improvements necessary for services.

Relevant Objective
Applicable Hazards
Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Sea Level Rise, Drought, Agricultural Pests/Disease, Epidemic/Pandemic, HazMat Release, Oil Spills, Landslide/Coastal Erosion, Tsunami, Dam Failure, Commercial Aircraft, Terrorism, Cyber Threat
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $250,000-$1,500,000 depending on scope and implementation Responsible Agency/Department Community Development and Sustainability and Resilience Other Comments
2022-26. Water System Reservoirs Seismic Evaluation and Other Upgrades Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The City’s 13 potable water reservoirs would be evaluated for seismic code deficiencies and other needed upgrades as necessary. The reservoirs all range in capacity from 1 to 10 million gallons.

Relevant Objective
Seismically retrofitting and upgrading aging equipment in each reservoir is important for protecting the City’s water supply from an earthquake event and also for protecting surrounding structures from a flood event resulting from a failed reservoir.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2022
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Capital Program funding - $173,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-27. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Program
Priority: Low
Mitigation Strategy Description
Develop a TDR Program that allows the transfer of residential density from the City’s High Fire Hazard Areas to High-Density residential land use designations.

Relevant Objective Reduce residential density in High Fire Hazard Areas Applicable Hazards Wildfire
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2030
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $100,000/Grant or General Fund Responsible Agency/Department Community Development Dept. – Long Range Planning Division Other Comments
Residential growth within the City is encouraged in the existing urban areas, rather than the front-country areas most subject to wildfire risk.

The City’s General Plan Update of 2011 did not change land use designations or increase development potential within High Fire Hazard Areas; however, this project would implement a policy that proposes to limit new development in High Fire Hazard Areas by

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 119
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Priority: Low
offering incentives and/or an option to transfer development rights to urban areas. The policy direction for this project is found in the 2011 Land Use Element and 2012 Climate Action Plan.
2022-28. El Estero WRC – Solids Handling
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The Solids Handling project includes Sludge Holding Tank replacement, Dewatering Building structural upgrades, conveyance/truck loading, and polymer system upgrades.

Relevant Objective
The construction of the new structures will bring these facilities up to earthquake standards reducing the risk of failure to structures and important wastewater processes within these structures during earthquakes. Also, the new facilities will allow the important wastewater process of dewatering to continue during floods or power failures due to wildfire
Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Sea Level Rise Estimated Timeline for Completion 2030
Estimated Cost/Funding Source SRF – $23,270,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-29. Desal Intake Pump Platforms Hardening Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
With the recent start-up of the City’s Desalination Facility, it was found that the Intake Pump Platforms are not fully supported by the ocean floor.

Relevant Objective
The platforms were originally pinned to the sandy, ocean bottom with vertical pilings in the 1990s. The pilings lack adequate scour protection. Currently, one of the platforms was found to be without any sand support to a depth of 18” below the bottom of the slab. Only the friction with the pilings is holding the slabs from dropping. Failure of the platforms would result in the interruption of raw water supplies to the Desalination Plant.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Landslide/Coastal Erosion, Tsunami Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and Water Capital funds as the grant match – $4,200,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-30. Castillo Street Capacity Improvement Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description This project would divert flow from the existing trunk sewer on the west side of Highway 101.

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
120 February 2023
Priority: High
Relevant Objective
The new pipeline would follow Castillo Street from Pedregosa Street to Haley Street, where it would reconnect to the existing system. The existing trunk sewer cannot convey wet weather peak flows.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding,
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Wastewater Collection Capital Funds - $3,201,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resource Division Other Comments
2022-31. Milpas Street Capacity Improvement Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description This project would provide relief for an undersized existing 6-inch pipe between Alphonse Street and Ortega Street.

Relevant Objective
Model results indicate the pipe currently has limited capacity during storm events and cannot convey the peak wet weather flow without surcharging the system.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Wastewater Collection Capital Funds - $82,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-32. Nopal Street Capacity Improvement Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
At Nopal Street and De La Guerra Street, a short reach of 6-inch pipe is a hydraulic bottleneck, which has difficulties conveying wet weather peak flows.

Relevant Objective This project would provide a parallel pipe to support the bottleneck and prevent a surcharge in the system.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Wastewater Collection Capital Funds - $35,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-33. Olive Street Capacity Improvement Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description This project would provide relief for an existing 8-inch pipe in Olive Street from Cota Street to Haley Street.

Relevant Objective The existing pipe is a hydraulic bottleneck that does not convey the peak wet weather flow for preventing a system surcharge.

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 121
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Priority: High
Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2030
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Wastewater Collection Capital Funds – $174,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-34. Ortega Street Capacity Improvement Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Between Laguna Street and Garden Street, an existing 6-inch pipe is a hydraulic bottleneck that does not convey wet weather flow capacity.

Relevant Objective This project would provide a parallel pipe to support the bottleneck and prevent a surcharge in the system.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2030
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Wastewater Collection Capital Funds - $107,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-35. Quarantina Street Capacity Improvement Project Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This project would start near the intersection of Ortega Street and the extension of Nopal Street. It would provide wet weather capacity to carry flows southwest in Ortega Street and then southeast in Quarantina Street.

Relevant Objective
Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Wastewater Collection Capital Funds - $650,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-36. State Street Capacity Improvement Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This project would provide additional wet weather capacity in State Street in front of La Cumbre Plaza and would address the restriction in the current siphon under Arroyo Burro.

Relevant Objective Maintains human health and safety and preserves the environment Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
122 February 2023
Priority: High
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Wastewater Collection Capital Funds - $541,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-37. Various Collection System Pipe Segments Capacity Improvement Project Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This project would address wet weather capacity constraints throughout the collection system. These pipes are currently unable to convey peak wet weather flows without surcharging the system.

Relevant Objective Maintains human health and safety and preserves the environment Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2030
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Wastewater Collection Capital Funds - $13,000,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-38. Rattlesnake Sewer Crossing Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
A sewer main supported on a pipe bridge conveys sewage across Rattlesnake Creek where it joins the remainder of the sewage conveyance system to the wastewater treatment plant.

Relevant Objective
This project would replace the pipe bridge that carries the sewer main across the creek with a directionally drilled pipe under the creek and a lift station. The pipe bridge is exposed and vulnerable and its length makes it cost-prohibitive to strength. In addition, strengthening would require extensive environmental review and mobilization in a creek.

Failure of the pipe would spill sewage into the creek.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2028
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Currently, there is funding for this project - $1,000,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-39. El Camino de la Luz Sewer Crossing Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
A sewer main supported on a pipe bridge conveys sewage across a ravine where it joins the remainder of the sewage conveyance system to the wastewater treatment plant.

Relevant Objective
This project would replace the pipe bridge that carries the sewer main across the ravine by rerouting it through city streets. The pipe bridge is exposed and vulnerable and its length makes it cost-prohibitive to

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 123
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Priority: High
strengthen. In addition, strengthening would require extensive environmental review and mobilization in a creek. Failure of the pipe would spill sewage into the ravine and potentially carry sewage to the ocean.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Flooding, Landslide/Coastal Erosion Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Currently, there is no funding for this project - $1,000,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-40. Wastewater Generator Containment Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This project would install containment around the generators throughout the wastewater treatment plant and collection system to prevent the spill of oil in the event of an earthquake.

Relevant Objective Maintains human health and safety and preserves the environment Applicable Hazards Earthquake
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Currently, there is no funding for the project - $700,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-41. Braemar Flood Wall Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This project would install a floodwall around the Braemar Lift Station to prevent inundation during flooding or dam failure and as prevention against sea level rise.

Relevant Objective
Braemar Lift Station is the largest lift station belonging to the City pumping approximately 1041 gal/min of sewage. The pump station sits next to the Arroyo Burro Creek and is vulnerable to flooding, dam failure, and sea level rise.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, Sea Level Rise, Dam Failure Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source SRF – 100,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments Final design in progress. City preparing SRF funding application 2022-42. Creek Crossing Projection Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This project would move sewer pipelines that are exposed on the sides of bridges to a place underneath the bridge for better protection during a high flow event or in the event of a landslide.

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
124 February 2023
Priority: High
Relevant Objective Maintains human health and safety and preserves the environment Applicable Hazards Flooding, Landslide/Coastal Erosion
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2029
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Currently, there is no funding for this project - $7,000,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division Other Comments
2022-43. Central Library Backup Power
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The Santa Barbara Public Library (SBPL) does not currently have any form of backup power. SBPL is a safe place during times of disaster and emergency, providing trusted information and serving as a place of refuge to the most vulnerable populations. Battery energy storage systems are the preferred source of backup power.

Relevant Objective
SBPL is also considered a cooling center during times of extreme heat.

Additionally, with the advent of the Public Safety Power Shutdown, the Library must have an alternate source of power. On a typical day, SBPL welcomes over 1500 visitors and this number is often doubled during outages and/or emergencies. This project proposes the installation of a portable backup generator and associated infrastructure costs to serve the Library.

Applicable Hazards Power Outages
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source
Purchase the portable generator and trailer to include the necessary retrofitting of the Library. The estimated cost is $300,000; there is currently no funding for this project
Responsible Agency/Department
Resilience & Sustainability
Public Works – Facilities
Library - Administration
Other Comments
2022-44. Collection System Freeway Crossing Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description This project will assess collection system pipes that run under the 101 freeway and recommend repairs, realignment, and/or abandonment.

Relevant Objective
This project will harden the current infrastructure and make this part of the collection system easier to operate and maintain. It will provide reliability during earthquake events.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Wastewater Capital Funds – $5,800,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works, Water Resources Division - Wastewater Systems

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 125
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Priority: High
Other Comments
The alternative analysis phase is in progress. Once a preferred alternative for consolidation and repair is determined, the final design of the project will begin.
2022-45. Lower Elevation Sewer Collection System
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The sewer collection system located south of the 101 freeway sits at a lower elevation that is at risk of becoming inundated with any rain or flooding event, which may lead to failure of the system.

Relevant Objective
Reinforcement of the underground collection system and the sealing of the manhole covers will be required to protect the system from infiltration and potential damage
Applicable Hazards Flooding, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2035
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Wastewater Collections Capital Improvement Program - $20,000,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division – Wastewater Collections Other Comments
2022-46. Cater Clearwell Seismic Upgrade
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The clearwell is a 5-million gallon finished water reservoir at the Cater Water Treatment Plant that was constructed in 1965. It has not had significant structural improvements since that time. It is believed that the buried clearwell, which is topped with two feet of soil, is overloaded and does not meet current seismic standards. In addition, it is a single point of failure having no bypass for distribution of water produced by the Cater Water Treatment Plant.

Relevant Objective Maintains safe drinking water for human health and safety Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Wildfire, Drought
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Water Capital Fund, Joint Powers Agreement – $1,500,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works, Water Resources Division – Water Systems Other Comments In the planning stages
2022-47. Water Conveyance Main
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This project would install a pipeline in the downtown area of the City to convey water from the desalination plant to the Cater Water Treatment Plant where it can be distributed to the entire City.

Relevant Objective Currently, water from the desalination plant is used in the downtown area of the City only. In the case of a natural disaster where the flow

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
126 February 2023
Priority: High
from Lake Cachuma or Gibraltar Reservoir is interrupted, the entire City would be able to receive water.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Wildfire, Drought
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Water Capital Funds, IRWM grant, Water Sales Agreement with Montecito Water District - $20,500,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works, Water Resources Division - Water Systems Other Comments The final design is complete. The final execution of the Water Sales Agreement is needed to begin construction
2022-48. Desalination Project Water Pump Station
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This project would install a pump station at the desalination plant to convey water from the desalination plant to the Cater Water Treatment Plant where it can be distributed to the entire City.

Currently, water from the desalination plant is used in the downtown area of the City only. In the case of a natural disaster where the flow from Lake Cachuma or Gibraltar Reservoir is interrupted, the entire City would be able to receive water.

Relevant Objective Maintains safe drinking water for human health and safety Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Wildlife, Drought
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Water Capital Funds, Water Sales Agreement with Montecito Water District - $4,000,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division – Water Systems Other Comments Final Design is beginning
2022-49. Water Transmission Main Renewal
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This four-part project will perform maintenance on and add resilience to the main pipelines that convey water throughout the City. A portion of this project will harden piping along the route needed to convey water from the desalination plant to the Cater Water Treatment Plant where it can be distributed to the entire City. This project will be in two phases, also renew the main transmission pipeline from the Cater Water Treatment Plant to Vic Trace reservoir. The final phase will install a system to cathodically protect the metal pipeline thereby extending pipeline life.

Relevant Objective Maintains safe drinking water for human health and safety Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Wildfire, Drought
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Water Capital Funds, Water Sales Agreement with Montecito Water District (only Phase One) - $3,500,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division – Water Systems

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 127
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Priority: High
Other Comments Design is in progress
2022-50. Cater Yard Piping Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This project would install a pipeline at the Cater Water Treatment Plant to allow water from the desalination plant to be piped into the Cater Water Treatment Plant Clearwell where it can be distributed to the entire City. Currently, water from the desalination plant is used in the downtown area of the City only. In the case of a natural disaster where the flow from Lake Cachuma or Gibraltar Reservoir is interrupted, the entire City would be able to receive water.

Relevant Objective Maintains safe drinking water and human safety Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Wildfire, Drought
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Water Capital Funds, Water Sales Agreement with Montecito Water District - $1,200,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works, Water Resources Division – Water Systems Other Comments In the planning stages
2022-51. Sheffield Pump Station Rehabilitation
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This pump station was constructed in 1982 and is nearing the end of its useful life. It is the City’s largest pump station and is critical for supplying water to the upper reaches of the City’s water distribution system by pumping water from the Cater Water Treatment Plant to Hoover and McLaughlin Reservoirs. Rehabilitation of this pump station will ensure the City’s ability to supply water to several high fire danger areas in case of an emergency.

Relevant Objective Maintain safe drinking water and human safety Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Wildfire
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Water Capital Fund – $166,000 Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division – Water Systems Other Comments
2022-52. Vic Trace Reservoir Replacement
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This reservoir was constructed in 1956 and has a capacity of ten million gallons. It is one of the City’s larger reservoirs and is critical for supplying water to the lower portion of the City’s water distribution system. Work has been recommended to improve the operations and maintenance of this reservoir and to increase the flexibility of supplying the water distribution system.

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
128 February 2023
Priority: High
Relevant Objective This reservoir is critical for supplying water in fire emergencies to the coastal and coastal interior high fire hazard areas.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Wildfire
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source SRF – $40,000,000
Responsible Agency/Department Public Works – Water Resources Division – Water Systems Other Comments
2022-53. Via Lucero Lift Station and Force Main
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The project will rehabilitate the Via Lucero Lift Station and reroute the force main to provide redundancy to the existing system that has limited capacity during storm events and cannot convey the peak wet weather flow.

Relevant Objective Objective 2.A: Mitigate vulnerability structures and public infrastructure including facilities, roadways, and utilities
Applicable Hazards Flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $1,000,000
Responsible Agency/Department Water Resources/Public Works Other Comments
2022-54. Alameda Well Pipeline to Ortega Groundwater Treatment Plan Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The Alameda Well accesses one of the City’s primary groundwater basins, Storage Unit 1 (in the general vicinity of downtown); however, water quality is relatively poor. The purpose of the proposed project is to install approximately 3,300 feet of new raw water main from the existing Alameda Well in Alameda Park to a tie-in point in the intersection of Olive Street and Anapamu Street, to the existing raw water main. Once tied in, the raw water main system will convey the raw water from Alameda Well to the Ortega Groundwater Treatment Plant to treat it for potable use, further adding to the City’s available water supply and resiliency to drought.

Relevant Objective Objective 2.A: Mitigate vulnerability structures and public infrastructure including facilities, roadways, and utilities
Applicable Hazards Drought
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $1,500,000
Responsible Agency/Department City of Santa Barbara/Public Works/Water Resources Other Comments

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 129
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022-55. Bilingual Outreach and Education campaign for Energy Assurance, Hazard Adaptation, and Climate Measures
Priority: Medium
Mitigation Strategy Description
Develop and implement bilingual outreach and education campaigns around energy and climate initiatives, including but not limited to energy resilience, climate adaptation, climate mitigation strategies.

Relevant Objective Disaster planning, recovery, and relief. Energy resilience. Climate change. Sea-level rise. Public Outreach.

Applicable Hazards Climate change; sea-level rise; energy outages; disaster relief.

Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $100,000
Responsible Agency/Department Sustainability and Resilience Other Comments
2022-56. Community Energy Assurance
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Conduct site assessments, feasibility studies, and implementation plans for community-wide energy assurance projects. Projects may include community-scale energy generation and storage, microgrid deployment, vehicle to grid technologies, and demand response programs.

Relevant Objective Disaster planning, recovery, and relief. Energy resilience. Climate change.

Applicable Hazards Energy outages; disaster relief; climate change Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $300,000-$700,000 depending on scope Responsible Agency/Department Sustainability and Resilience Other Comments
2022-57. Clean Energy Assurance for City Facilities, Emergency Operations, and City Fleet Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Scope and implement clean energy generation and storage for critical municipal facilities, City emergency operations, and the City’s fleet.

Ensure functionality during energy outages.

Relevant Objective Disaster planning, recovery, and relief. Energy resilience. Climate change.

Applicable Hazards Disaster planning, recovery, and relief. Energy resilience. Climate change.

Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $200,000-$2,000,000 depending on scope Responsible Agency/Department Sustainability and Resilience Other Comments

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
130 February 2023
2022-58. Disaster Debris Management Plan Implementation Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Build upon the Santa Barbara County Debris Management Plan by assessing, securing, and permitting appropriate temporary debris storage, disposal, and discharge sites and developing processes for the City of Santa Barbara to support regional debris management during and following a disaster. Debris-generating events include windstorms, flooding, debris flows, mudslides, earthquake, wildland fires, and other incidents. Appropriate sediment sources could also potentially be used for beach nourishment and other erosion mitigation efforts.

Relevant Objective Disaster planning and recovery.

Applicable Hazards Windstorm, flooding, debris flows, mudslides, earthquake, wildland fire, and other incidents
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2024
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $250,000
Responsible Agency/Department Sustainability and Resilience and Public Works Other Comments
2022-59. Airport Sea-Level Rise Adaptation Plan
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Building upon the previously completed Goleta Slough Sea-Level Rise Assessment, study adaptation actions for the Airport, including adaptations options for the impacted stormwater system.

Relevant Objective Would prepare airport for sea level rise.

Applicable Hazards Sea-level rise; flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $250,000
Responsible Agency/Department Airport; Sustainability and Resilience Other Comments
2022-60. Changes to Development Floodplain Regulations and Creek Setbacks Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Modify the City’s floodplain regulations and creek setbacks south of Highway 101 for new and substantially redeveloped structures to address increased flood risks associated with sea level rise and extreme rainfall events. Develop incentives for floodproofing and raising existing structures (permit streamlining or relief from design, zoning, or height requirements) south of Highway 101 and other areas of the City with projected increases in flooding from sea-level rise and extreme rainfall events.

Relevant Objective Would prevent damages to structures during flooding Applicable Hazards Sea level rise; flooding; climate change Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $100,000

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 131
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Priority: High
Responsible Agency/Department Sustainability and Resilience Other Comments
2022-61. Sea-Level Rise Groundwater Impacts and Adaptation Options Study Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Study existing groundwater elevations, freeboard from typical levels up to flood threshold, and potential impacts of sea-level rise. Study the potential of raised groundwater levels to spread contamination. Study feasibility of groundwater pumping to lower the water table.

Relevant Objective Would prevent damage to infrastructure and buildings from corrosion and other groundwater impacts
Applicable Hazards Sea-level rise; flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $150,000
Responsible Agency/Department Sustainability and Resilience; Other Comments
2022-62. Harbor Breakwater and Groins
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The City’s recently completed Sea-Level Rise Adaptation Plan identified critical facilities that are vulnerable to sea level rise and prioritized actions to adapt. Conduct a feasibility study and concept design for raising or modifying Harbor breakwater, rock groin, sand spit, and walkway and wall spanning from the breakwater to the Harbor commercial area to reduce impacts from existing storm surges and address the impacts of sea-level rise. This will protect not just the Harbor, but also continue to protect the West Beach neighborhood.

Relevant Objective Objective 2.A: Mitigate vulnerability structures and public infrastructure including facilities, roadways, and utilities
Applicable Hazards Sea-level rise; flooding; storm surge and waves; tsunami Estimated Timeline for Completion 2024
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $200,000
Responsible Agency/Department Waterfront and Sustainability and Resilience Other Comments Upon completion of the feasibility and alternatives analysis, a capital project will be programmed in future years.
2022-63. Laguna Creek, Tide Gate, and Pump Station Redesign Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The City’s recently completed Sea-Level Rise Adaptation Plan identified critical facilities that are vulnerable to sea level rise and prioritized actions to adapt. Redesign the Laguna Creek tide gate, pump station, and channel to accommodate sea level rise and increased creek discharge flooding from changes in rainfall runoff. The

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
132 February 2023
Priority: High
project includes the creation of a Laguna Creek conceptual plan, infrastructure relocation alternatives analysis, beach berm analysis, and updated hydrologic and biological studies. The tide gate already overtops during some high tide events and storm surges.

Relevant Objective Objective 2.A: Mitigate vulnerability structures and public infrastructure including facilities, roadways, and utilities
Applicable Hazards Sea-level rise; flooding; tsunami
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $350,000
Responsible Agency/Department Sustainability and Resilience and Public Works Other Comments Upon completion of the feasibility and alternatives analysis, a capital project will be programmed in future years.
2022-64. Prepare Marina Facilities and City Pier for Sea-Level Rise Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Renovate marina facilities and the City Pier to accommodate increased tide heights and storm surges related to sea-level rise. City Pier supports the marinas fuel dock, icehouse, and coast guard facilities.

Relevant Objective Would prevent damage to marinas and pier during storms and high tide events
Applicable Hazards Sea-level rise; storm surge
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2030
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $500,000
Responsible Agency/Department Waterfront; Sustainability and Resilience Other Comments
2022-65. Master Drainage Plan and Increased Rainfall Intensities Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This project consists of new hydrologic and flood modeling factoring in sea-level rise and changes in rainfall intensities from climate change.

Results from this study are necessary for other projects including changes to floodplain regulations, creek setbacks, design of the Laguna Creek tide gate, and adaptation options for the stormwater system.

Relevant Objective Would facilitate planning for increased flooding and impacts to stormwater system
Applicable Hazards Sea-level rise; flooding
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $150,000
Responsible Agency/Department Sustainability and Resilience Other Comments

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 133
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022-66. Regional Shoreline Monitoring Program
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Develop and implement a Shoreline Monitoring Program in coordination with other regional, state, and federal agencies to monitor sea-level rise-related hazards; identify action thresholds, and regularly reassess the need for hazard mitigation actions. Use program to assess the success of implemented mitigation actions.

Relevant Objective Key element in decisionmaking for adaption Applicable Hazards Sea-level rise; flooding; shoreline erosion Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $300,000
Responsible Agency/Department Sustainability and Resilience; BEACON Other Comments
2022-67. Stormwater System Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Plan Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Assess vulnerabilities and adaptation options for those portions of the stormwater system potentially affected by sea-level rise and extreme rainfall-related hazards.

Relevant Objective Would ensure continued operation of stormwater system during flooding and erosion events
Applicable Hazards Sea-level rise; flooding; climate change; erosion Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $300,000
Responsible Agency/Department Sustainability and Resilience; Public Works Other Comments
2022-68. Wastewater and Water System Vulnerabilities and Adaptation Options Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The City’s recently completed Sea-Level Rise Adaptation Plan identified critical facilities that are vulnerable to sea level rise and prioritized actions to adapt. One of the highest priority actions identified for the next few years is a comprehensive study of adaptation options for threatened portions of the wastewater and water systems, including the redesign of portions of the system, adaptation options for El Estero Water Resource Center, and possible service point improvements. Portions of the wastewater system, in particular, are already at risk from flooding during major storms.

One of the most vulnerable facilities identified is the existing sewer trunk line on Cabrillo Boulevard that carries sewage to the El Estero Water Resources Center to be treated. The existing pipeline and manholes are vulnerable to flooding from storm surges during major storms and will be at risk from storm surge and erosion due to sealevel rise, which would result in sanitary sewer overflows. The analysis

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
134 February 2023
Priority: High
should study the feasibility and alternatives for relocating the existing trunk line.

Relevant Objective Objective 2.A: Mitigate vulnerability structures and public infrastructure including facilities, roadways, and utilities
Applicable Hazards Sea-level rise; flooding; shoreline erosion; tsunami Estimated Timeline for Completion 2023
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $500,000
Responsible Agency/Department Sustainability and Resilience and Public Works Other Comments Upon completion of the feasibility and alternatives analysis, a capital project will be programmed in future years.
2022-69. Waterfront and Harbor 30-Year Plan
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This is a detailed study of the assets along the Waterfront and Harbor to:

Analyze adaptation options and establish 30-year design storm and sea level rise amounts for Harbor Commercial area, parking areas, and other assets along the Waterfront.

Identify options to relocate to the extent feasible and where not feasible protect in place sewer main and collocated gas pipelines, water lines, and major utilities south of Cabrillo Boulevard; Assess the feasibility of additional beach berm construction, dune creation, and sediment management to address 30-year
vulnerabilities along Waterfront;
Assess options for increased Harbor dredging and other sand supplies.

Relevant Objective Objective 2.A: Mitigate vulnerability structures and public infrastructure including facilities, roadways, and utilities Applicable Hazards Sea-level rise; flooding; shoreline erosion; tsunami Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $250,000
Responsible Agency/Department Sustainability and Resilience; Waterfront; Parks and Recreation Other Comments
2022-70. Airport Sewer Master Plan – Phase III
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The 2004 Sewer Master Plan was prepared to provide a modern solution to the airport sewer system originally constructed in the 1940s.

This project would implement a second phase of the Sewer Master Plan. The second phase consists of the removal of lift station 3 and the re-routing of the northwest quadrant of the airfield to flow to the new Goleta Sanitary District lift station on Norman Firestone Road. This will avoid the need to pump sewage in an 80-year-old force main under the main air carrier runway and through the Goleta Slough State Ecological Reserve.

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 135
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Priority: High
Relevant Objective Maintain Infrastructure, Modernize City Facilities, Support the City's Plans
Applicable Hazards Earthquake, flood, infrastructure failure Estimated Timeline for Completion This is an unscheduled project in the City’s CIP. Completion would take nine months.

Estimated Cost/Funding Source $2.3 million – Airport Capital Fund Responsible Agency/Department Airport Department
Other Comments
The first phase of the Sewer Master Plan, the removal of lift stations 1 and 2 and their replacement with a new Goleta Sanitary District lift station, was completed in 2009.
2022-71. Central Library ADA Elevator
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Installation of an ADA compliant elevator would ease mobility challenges and allow for greater access to all areas of the Library.

The Santa Barbara Library (SBPL) serves as a cooling center during extreme weather conditions and serves as a place of refuge for all ages during times of disaster such as local fire. While the Library does have a small elevator, its size presents challenges for mobility devices, which in turn limits ease of access to spaces in the facility.

Relevant Objective
Installation of an ADA compliant elevator to allow for full access to all spaces in the Library, particularly while serving as a cooling shelter or refuge during disaster and emergency.

Applicable Hazards Lack of compliance with current ADA standards and challenges for mobility devices.

Estimated Timeline for Completion Tentatively Fall/Winter 2022 Estimated Cost/Funding Source $2,267,535/ Partially Measure C Responsible Agency/Department City of Santa Barbara Library Department Other Comments
This project is in progress. The design and plan review is complete. The permit has been issued and bidding should take place in January 2022 with construction to tentatively begin March 2022. 2022-72. Las Positas Landfill Capping Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The Closed Las Positas Landfill is located within the boundaries of Eling’s Park includes a methane recovery system that burns off methane produced. The methane recovery system requires an onsite propane tank that poses an explosives hazard and produces hazardous and non-hazardous waste products that are stored onsite pending disposal.

There is also a section of soil that has tested above the action limits for lead contamination. The land is currently held in a longer-term lease agreement with a private operator that operates sports fields and recreational amenities onsite.

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
136 February 2023
Priority: High
Relevant Objective
This project includes the installation of a clay liner over the closed landfill footprint at the baseball and soccer fields. The cap would decrease the potential for infiltration of water into the buried waste which may decrease the generation of methane and decrease the potential for leaching of contaminants to groundwater.

Applicable Hazards Hazardous Materials release
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2025? (prefer to occur when field turf replacement occurs in 2-3 years)
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $720,000 for clay layer to cap sports fields (does not include design, permitting, etc.), the cost would be more do line the entire landfill area.

Responsible Agency/Department City of Santa Barbara, Sustainability and Resilience Department Other Comments
The project could be expanded to install the cap across the entire closed landfill footprint, but that would cost more. The above cost does not include design, technical studies, permitting, maintenance, and monitoring. Before moving forward with designing the cap the metrics for ending the monitoring and reporting program and methane mitigation should be defined with the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Santa Barbara County Public Health Department.
2022-73. Las Positas Creek Restoration Project
Priority: Medium
Mitigation Strategy Description
This creek restoration/water quality improvement project includes the removal of concrete, invasive plants, and other debris from Las Positas Creek, which will facilitate flood flow conveyance through the creek channel. The project scope also includes biotechnical bank and toe stabilization, which will reduce erosion and bank failure near adjacent homes and Las Positas Road.

Relevant Objective Reduce flooding, erosion, and creek bank failure along Las Positas Road and nearby private properties.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, creek bank erosion.

Estimated Timeline for Completion Estimated completion in 2027.

Estimated Cost/Funding Source The estimated cost is $950,000. The funding source is Measure B (Creeks Fund) and unidentified grant funding.

Responsible Agency/Department Parks and Recreation/Creeks Division Other Comments
2022-74. Arroyo Burro Restoration at Palermo Drive
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This creek restoration/water quality improvement project includes the removal of concrete, invasive plants, and other debris from Arroyo Burro, which will facilitate flood flow conveyance through the creek channel. The project scope also includes biotechnical bank and toe stabilization, which will reduce erosion and bank failure near the adjacent park, homes, and commercial properties.

Relevant Objective Reduce flooding, erosion, and creek bank failure along City park and nearby private properties.

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 137
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Priority: High
Applicable Hazards Flooding, creek bank erosion
Estimated Timeline for Completion Estimated completion in 2026.

Estimated Cost/Funding Source Estimated cost is $2,000,000. The funding source is Measure B (Creeks Fund) and unidentified grant funding.

Responsible Agency/Department Parks and Recreation/Creeks Division Other Comments
2022-75. San Roque Creek Restoration Project
Priority: Medium
Mitigation Strategy Description
This creek restoration/water quality improvement project includes the removal of concrete, invasive plants, and other debris from San Roque Creek, which will facilitate flood flow conveyance through the creek channel. The project scope also includes biotechnical bank and toe stabilization, which will reduce erosion and bank failure near adjacent roads, homes, and commercial areas of the City.

Relevant Objective Reduce flooding, erosion, and creek bank failure along San Roque Creek.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, creek bank erosion
Estimated Timeline for Completion Estimated completion in 2027.

Estimated Cost/Funding Source Estimated cost is $1,300,000. The funding source is Measure B (Creeks Fund) and unidentified grant funding.

Responsible Agency/Department Parks and Recreation/Creeks Division Other Comments
2022-76. Mid-Arroyo Burro Restoration Project
Priority: Medium
Mitigation Strategy Description
This creek restoration/water quality improvement project includes the removal of concrete, invasive plants, and other debris from Arroyo Burro, which will facilitate flood flow conveyance through the creek channel. The project scope also includes biotechnical bank and toe stabilization, which will reduce erosion and bank failure along Arroyo Burro in the upper State Street area of the City.

Relevant Objective
Reduce flooding, erosion, and creek bank failure along Arroyo Burro, upper State Street, and the surrounding neighborhood and business district.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, creek bank erosion
Estimated Timeline for Completion Estimated completion in 2027.

Estimated Cost/Funding Source Estimated cost is $1,350,000. The funding source is Measure B (Creeks Fund) and unidentified grant funding.

Responsible Agency/Department Parks and Recreation/Creeks Division Other Comments

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
138 February 2023
2022-77. Upper Mission Creek Restoration Project
Priority: Medium
Mitigation Strategy Description
This creek restoration/water quality improvement project includes the removal of concrete, invasive plants, and other debris from upper Mission Creek, which will facilitate flood flow conveyance through the creek channel. The project scope also includes biotechnical bank and toe stabilization, which will reduce erosion and bank failure near adjacent parks, homes, and Mission Canyon Road.

Relevant Objective Reduce flooding, erosion, and creek bank failure along Mission Canyon Road and nearby private properties.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, creek bank erosion
Estimated Timeline for Completion Estimated completion in 2028.

Estimated Cost/Funding Source Estimated cost is $1,600,000. The funding source is Measure B (Creeks Fund) and unidentified grant funding.

Responsible Agency/Department Parks and Recreation/Creeks Division Other Comments
2022-78. Mission Creek Restoration at Oak Park
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This creek restoration/water quality improvement project includes the removal of concrete, invasive plants, and other debris from Mission Creek, which will facilitate flood flow conveyance through the creek channel. The project scope also includes biotechnical bank and toe stabilization, which will reduce erosion and bank failure near adjacent homes and Oak Park.

Relevant Objective Reduce flooding, erosion, and creek bank failure along Mission Creek at Oak Park and nearby private properties.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, creek bank erosion
Estimated Timeline for Completion Estimated completion in 2024.

Estimated Cost/Funding Source Estimated cost is $1,250,000. The funding source is Measure B (Creeks Fund) and unidentified grant funding.

Responsible Agency/Department Parks and Recreation/Creeks Division Other Comments
2022-79. Lower Mission Creek Restoration Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This creek restoration/water quality improvement project includes the removal of concrete, invasive plants, and other debris from lower Mission Creek, which will facilitate flood flow conveyance through the creek channel. The project scope also includes biotechnical bank and toe stabilization, which will reduce erosion and bank failure near adjacent homes, businesses, and downtown Santa Barbara streets.

Relevant Objective Reduce flooding, erosion, and creek bank failure along lower Mission Creek, downtown roads, and nearby private properties.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, creek bank erosion
Estimated Timeline for Completion Estimated completion in 2025.

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 139
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Priority: High
Estimated Cost/Funding Source Estimated cost is $2,300,000. The funding source is Measure B (Creeks Fund) and unidentified grant funding.

Responsible Agency/Department Parks and Recreation/Creeks Division Other Comments
2022-80. Old Mission Creek Restoration at Figueroa Street Priority: Medium
Mitigation Strategy Description
This creek restoration/water quality improvement project includes the removal of concrete, invasive plants, and other debris from Old Mission Creek, which will facilitate flood flow conveyance and improve floodplain access through the creek channel. The project scope also includes biotechnical bank and toe stabilization, which will reduce erosion and bank failure near adjacent homes and Figueroa Street.

Relevant Objective Reduce flooding, erosion, and creek bank failure along Old Mission Creek, Figueroa Street, and nearby private properties.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, creek bank erosion
Estimated Timeline for Completion Estimated completion in 2028.

Estimated Cost/Funding Source Estimated cost is $1,000,000. The funding source is Measure B (Creeks Fund) and unidentified grant funding.

Responsible Agency/Department Parks and Recreation/Creeks Division Other Comments
2022-81. Rattlesnake Creek Restoration Project
Priority: Medium
Mitigation Strategy Description
This creek restoration/water quality improvement project includes the removal of concrete, invasive plants, and other debris from Rattlesnake Creek, which will facilitate flood flow conveyance through the creek channel. The project scope also includes biotechnical bank and toe stabilization, which will reduce erosion and bank failure near adjacent homes and Las Canoas Road.

Relevant Objective Reduce flooding, erosion, and creek bank failure along Rattlesnake Creek, Las Canoas Road, and nearby private properties.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, creek bank erosion
Estimated Timeline for Completion Estimated completion in 2027.

Estimated Cost/Funding Source Estimated cost is $1,250,000. The funding source is Measure B (Creeks Fund) and unidentified grant funding.

Responsible Agency/Department Parks and Recreation/Creeks Division Other Comments
2022-82. Sycamore Creek Restoration Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description This creek restoration/water quality improvement project includes the removal of concrete, invasive plants, and other debris from Sycamore

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
140 February 2023
Priority: High
Creek, which will facilitate flood flow conveyance through the creek channel. The project scope also includes biotechnical bank and toe stabilization, which will reduce erosion and bank failure near adjacent streets, parks, homes, and businesses.

Relevant Objective Reduce flooding, erosion, and creek bank failure along Sycamore Creek and nearby private properties.

Applicable Hazards Flooding, creek bank erosion
Estimated Timeline for Completion Estimated completion in 2028.

Estimated Cost/Funding Source Estimated cost is $80,000,000. The funding source is Measure B (Creeks Fund) and unidentified grant funding.

Responsible Agency/Department Parks and Recreation/Creeks Division Other Comments
2022-83. Andree Clark Bird Refuge Restoration Project
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
This wetland restoration/water quality improvement project includes removal and replacement of a failing weir and weir gates at the Andree Clark Bird Refuge, which will facilitate flood flow conveyance out of the Bird Refuge and under Cabrillo Boulevard. The project scope also includes managing the sand berm between the Bird Refuge and the Pacific Ocean during storms to allow water to flow through the culverts and prevent flooding of Cabrillo Boulevard.

Relevant Objective Reduce flooding on Cabrillo Boulevard.

Applicable Hazards Flooding.

Estimated Timeline for Completion Estimated completion in 2023.

Estimated Cost/Funding Source Estimated cost is $2,500,000. The funding source is Measure B (Creeks Fund) and unidentified grant funding.

Responsible Agency/Department Parks and Recreation/Creeks Division Other Comments
2022-84. Defensible Space/Home Hardening Survey
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Assess vulnerabilities and needs regarding home hardening and defensible space within the City’s designated High Fire Hazard Areas.

Encourage home hardening retrofits
Complete Defensible Space Survey
Increase grant funding opportunities
Develop programs to incentivize improved defensible space around homes
Relevant Objective Improve Defensible Space regarding home hardening within communities vulnerable to wildfire.

Applicable Hazards Wildfire
Estimated Timeline for Completion FY 2023-24
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $20,000 from grants and/or Wildland General Fund

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 141
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Priority: High
Responsible Agency/Department Fire Department/Prevention - Wildfire Other Comments This task is based on recommendations made in the 2021 Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP)
2022-85. Expand Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment District Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
The Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) expanded all four of the City’s designated High Fire Hazard Areas. As part of the CWPP implementation, a study and survey should be completed to determine areas to potentially be included in the Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment District. This would be determined by ballot measure to residents in the newly proposed area.

Relevant Objective
Create a new Assessment District in the Coastal and Coastal Interior High Fire Hazard areas and expand the existing Wildfire Suppression Assessment District within the Foothill High Fire Hazard area to include parcels added in the CWPP.

Applicable Hazards Wildfire
Estimated Timeline for Completion FY2024-25
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $40,000 Wildland General Fund Responsible Agency/Department Fire Department/Prevention - Wildfire Other Comments
This project is expected to take 2+ years and implementation will be determined by ballot measures issued to all residents within the proposed areas.
2022-86. Increase Evacuation Safety
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Combine CWPP and 2014 Evacuations Procedure Analysis.

Publicly identify evacuation routes in High Fire Hazard Areas with signage
Identify Roads that do not meet SBFD Access Standards
Conduct detailed evacuation study
Relevant Objective Improve evacuation safety in communities vulnerable to wildfire.

Applicable Hazards Wildfire, Flooding, Debris Flow
Estimated Timeline for Completion FY2023-24
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $20,000 from grants and/or Wildland General Fund Responsible Agency/Department Fire Department/Prevention - Wildfire Other Comments A consultant may be needed for portions of the Evacuation Procedure Analysis.

7.0. Mitigation Strategy
142 February 2023
2022-87. Fuels Reduction Within Identified Vegetation Management Units Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Complete fuels reduction projects within all 50 of the identified Vegetation Management Units within the City. This also includes areas within the Community Fuels Treatment Network.

Relevant Objective
Reduce wildfire danger within our communities by expanding defensible space in targeted locations beyond the homeowner’s required clearance.

Applicable Hazards Wildfire
Estimated Timeline for Completion FY2035
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $500,000-$1,000,000 from Grants/Wildland General Fund/Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment District Fund Responsible Agency/Department Fire Department/Prevention - Wildfire Other Comments
Reduce wildfire danger within our communities by expanding defensible space in targeted locations beyond the homeowner’s required clearance.
2022-88. Community Wildfire Protection Plan Implementations Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description Continue to evaluate and implement actions recommended within the Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP).

Relevant Objective Complete all recommended actions, projects, and goals as outlined and identified within the Community Wildfire Protection Plan.

Applicable Hazards Wildfire
Estimated Timeline for Completion FY2030
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $300,000 from Grants/Wildland General Fund/Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment District Fund
Responsible Agency/Department Fire Department/Prevention - Wildland Other Comments
Multiple projects and recommendations identified within the Community Wildfire Protection Plan are critical in improving the Fire Department’s ability to mitigate wildfire danger within vulnerable communities. This includes educational outreach, improved enforcement, updating mapping, and increased training opportunities for both agency personnel and the public.
2022-89. Upgrade City Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Upgrade the City EOC’s electronic technology for better communications and interoperability. The upgrading of the EOC would replace projectors and screens with smart TVs, including teleconferencing capabilities, wireless network, and cameras to feed information to the Policy Room, Bullpen, and Administrative Conference Room.

Relevant Objective
The City’s EOC is a critical facility during times of disaster. The facility has not been upgraded since 2009 and there are challenges with interoperability.

8.0. Plan Maintenance
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 143
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Priority: High
Applicable Hazards All Hazards
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2026
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $75,000
Responsible Agency/Department Fire Department/Office of Emergency Services Other Comments
2022-90. Relocation of Fire Station 7 Building
Priority: High
Mitigation Strategy Description
Fire Station 7, located at 2411 Stanwood Drive, was built in 1951 and the station is essentially the same as when it was built. The station was built to accommodate an all-male crew with one dorm room, one locker room, and one shower/restroom. The shower/restroom was divided in the early 1980s.

During the remodeling review process, it was noted that Station 7 was built above an earthquake fault. With that discovery, it was determined that Station 7 needs to be relocated for the safety of the staff housed in that station.

Relevant Objective
For the relocation and construction of the Station, the project will include hiring a design professional to evaluate the long-term needs (Needs Assessment) of the Fire Department at Fire Station 7 that contains separate dorm rooms with lockers, separate restrooms, a separate captain’s office, and more apparatus floor space to accommodate today’s larger fire engines.

Applicable Hazards Earthquake, Wildfire
Estimated Timeline for Completion 2030
Estimated Cost/Funding Source $6,000,000
Responsible Agency/Department Fire Department/Public Works Other Comments

8.0 PLAN MAINTENANCE

8.1 MONITORING, EVALUATING, AND UPDATING THE PLAN
Since the last LHMP in 2017, the LPT has monitored, evaluated, and updated the plan on a continuing and as-needed basis. The City was very successful in implementing the 2017 mitigation actions as noted in Table 7-1. The remaining mitigation actions outlined in the 2017 LHMP are ongoing at the time of this 2022 update.

The City of Santa Barbara Office of Emergency Services (OES) will be responsible for ensuring that this plan is monitored on an ongoing basis. City OES will call the Local Hazard Mitigation Planning (LHMP) team together on an annual basis to review the mitigation actions outlined in this plan and discuss progress. During this meeting, the LHMP team will develop a list of items to be updated, added, or removed in future revisions of this plan.

8.0. Plan Maintenance
144 February 2023
City OES will report the outcomes of the annual meeting to the County Office of Emergency Management (OEM) and the City’s Disaster Council.

The Plan will be a discussion/work item on the City’s Emergency Managers Task Team (EMTT) agenda each year. Department heads and other emergency preparedness staff who serve in the City’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) will focus on evaluating the Plan in light of technological, budgetary, political changes, or other significant events that may occur during the year.

The Plan’s existence will be addressed in the City’s Emergency Management Plan, as well as discussed at Community Disaster Education presentations in both English and Spanish.

The City will continue to participate in the countywide MAC and attend the annual meeting organized by the County Office of Emergency Management to discuss items to be updated/added in future revisions of this plan. The MJHMP is evaluated by the MAC annually to determine the effectiveness of programs, and to reflect changes in land development or programs that may affect mitigation priorities. This includes re-evaluation of goals, objectives, and mitigation actions for each jurisdiction by the MAC. The MAC also reviews the goals and mitigation actions to determine their relevance to changing situations in the county, as well as changes in State or Federal regulations and policy. The MAC reviews the risk assessment portion of the MJHMP and its annexes to determine if this information should be updated or modified, given any new available data. The responsible parties for the mitigation actions report on the status of their projects, the success of various implementation processes, difficulties encountered, success of coordination efforts, and which strategies should be revised. Any updates or changes necessary for the City’s LHMP will be forwarded to the County Office of Emergency Management for inclusion in further updates to the MJHMP.

Major disasters affecting the City, legal changes, and/or other events may trigger a meeting of the LHMP team. This group will be responsible for determining if the plan needs to be updated before the five-year mark.

The City of Santa Barbara is committed to reviewing and updating this plan at least once every five years, as required by the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000.

8.2 IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH EXISTING PLANS AND PROGRAMS
The City implements the LHMP through existing plans, programs, and procedures, as detailed in Section 4.0, Capability Assessment. This LHMP provides a baseline of information on the hazards impacting the City and the existing institutions, plans, policies and ordinances that help to implement the LHMP (e.g., General Plan, building codes, floodplain management ordinance). The General Plan and the LHMP annex are complementary documents that work together to achieve the goal of reducing risk exposure to the City’s citizens. An update to a general plan may trigger an update to the hazard mitigation plan. Implementation responsibilities of mitigation actions is integrated into the operational functions of the responsibility parties identified, including responsibility for seeking funding needed for implementation.

The City incorporates the LHMP by reference into its General Plan Safety Element. Under AB 2140, the City may adopt its current, FEMA-approved LHMP into the Safety Element of the General Plan.

This adoption makes the City eligible to be considered for part or all of its local-share costs on

9.0. References
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 145
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan eligible Public Assistance funding to be provided by the state through the California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA) (see Section 2.0, Plan Purpose and Authority for the adopting resolutions).

The LHMP has also been prepared to support the City’s CWPP to reduce wildfire risks and Sea Level Rise Adaption Plan to address changing coastal hazards over time. The Floodplain Management Ordinance applies in concert with the City’s zoning ordinance and building codes to reduce flooding hazards from land use. The LHMP includes several mitigations addressing flood control infrastructure to support the City’s efforts to reduce flooding hazards.

The information contained within this LHMP, including results from the Vulnerability Assessment and the Mitigation Strategy, is used by the City to help inform updates and the development of local plans, programs, and policies. The City may utilize the hazard information when developing and implementing the City’s capital improvement programs and the Planning and Building Divisions may utilize the hazard information when reviewing a site plan or other type of development applications.

The City’s budget process and CIP are updated to include hazard mitigation actions.

8.3 ONGOING PUBLIC OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT
The public will continue to be involved whenever the plan is updated and, as appropriate, during the monitoring and evaluation process. Before the adoption of updates, the City will provide multiple opportunities for the public to comment on the revisions. A public notice will be published before the meetings to announce the comment period and meeting locations. Moreover, the City will engage stakeholders in community emergency planning. As described in Section 3.4, Public Outreach and Engagement, the public outreach strategy used during development of the current update will provide a framework for public engagement through the plan maintenance process. It can be adapted for ongoing public outreach as determined to be feasible by the MAC and the LPT.

8.4 POINT OF CONTACT
Comments or suggestions regarding this plan may be submitted at any time to the City using the following information:

Liliana Encinas, Fire Public Outreach Coordinator
City of Santa Barbara
Fire Department
Office of Emergency Services
925 Chapala Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101

9.0 REFERENCES
California Department of Water Resources (DWR). 2021a. Best Available Map (BAM). Accessed:
1 November 2021. Retrieved from: https://gis.bam.water.ca.gov/bam/#skip-to-content California Geological Survey. 2019. Landslides. Accessed: 1 November 2021. Retrieved from:
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/landslides#debrisflows

9.0. References
146 February 2023
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2021. Symptoms of COVID-19. Retrieved from:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms.html Charity Thoman. 2013. Meningococcal Outbreak at UCSB. Santa Barbara Independent.

City of Santa Barbara. 2020. “City Of Santa Barbara Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan For The Local Coastal Program Update Vulnerability Assessment Update.” https://www.santabarbaraca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=229629 City of Santa Barbara. 2021. Sea-Level Rise Adaptation Plan. Accessed: 1 November 2021.

Retrieved from:
https://www.santabarbaraca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=229622.

County Fire Department. 2021b. Notable Incidents and Deployments of 2019. Accessed: 26 October 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.sbcfire.com/notable-incidents County of Santa Barbara. 2017. Coastal Resiliency Project: Sea Level Rise and Coastal Hazards Vulnerability Assessment. Accessed: 1 November 2021. Retrieved from:
https://cosantabarbara.app.box.com/s/uon3kzbfsviq8xoevcxeeke64c2tk87f.

Department of Water Resources (DWR) Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD). 2021a. Division of Safety of Dams. Accessed: 5 November 2021. Retrieved from:
https://water.ca.gov/programs/all-programs/division-of-safety-of-dams.

FEMA. 2021. Protective Actions Research: Extreme Heat. Accessed: 3 November 2021. Retrieved from:
https://community.fema.gov/ProtectiveActions/s/article/Extreme-Heat.

FloodList. 2021. USA – Deadly Flooding and Mudslides in California (Updated). Accessed: 29 October 2021. Retrieved from: https://floodlist.com/america/usa/flood-mudslidecalifornia-january-2018 Jervis, L. 2020. “Laurie Jervis: Late Season Extreme Heat Leads to Accelerated Grape Harvest”.

Noozhawk, November 2, 2020. Accessed: 5 November 2021. Retrieved from:
https://www.noozhawk.com/article/laurie_jervis_late_season_extreme_heat_leads_to_ac celerated_grape_harvest.

Lara Cooper. 2015. Norovirus Outbreak Sickens Hundreds in Santa Barbara County. Noozhawk.

National Institute of Environmental Health Services (NIH). 2018. Vectorborne and Zoonotic Diseases.

Retrieved from:
https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/programs/climatechange/health_impacts/vectorborn e/index.cfm
National Interagency Fire Center. 2021. Wildland Fire Open Data. Accessed: 26 October 2021.

Retrieved from: https://data-nifc.opendata.arcgis.com/
NOAA. 2021d. Storm Events Database – Santa Barbara County – January 1, 1990, to August 31, 2021. Accessed: 4 November 2021. Retrieved from:
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?eventType=%28Z%29+Frost%2FFree ze&beginDate_mm=01&beginDate_dd=01&beginDate_yyyy=1990&endDate_mm=07&en dDate_dd=31&endDate_yyyy=2021&county=SANTA%2BBARBARA%3A83&hailfilter=0.00 &tornfilter=0&windfilter=000&sort=DT&submitbutton=Search&statefips=6%2CCALIFORNIA.

9.0. References
City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 147
Annex to the Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Noozhawk. 2015. Norovirus Outbreak Sickens Hundreds in Santa Barbara County. Retrieved from:
https://www.noozhawk.com/article/norovirus_outbreak_sickens_hundreds_in_santa_barb ara_county
Noozhawk. 2020. Neal Graffy: Santa Barbara’s Hottest Day, and a Record High of 133 Degrees.

Retrieved from:
https://www.noozhawk.com/article/santa_barbaras_hottest_day_and_a_record_high_of _133_degrees_20200617
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2021. Heat Illness Prevention Campaign:

Heat Safety Tool. Accessed: 3 November 2021. Retrieved from:
https://www.osha.gov/heat/heat-app.

Ocean Protection Council (OPC). 2018. State of California Sea-level Rise Guidance – 2018 Update.

Accessed: 4 November 2021. Retrieved from:
https://opc.ca.gov/webmaster/ftp/pdf/agenda_items/20180314/Item3_ExhibitA_OPC_SLR_Guidance-rd3.pdf.

Santa Barbara County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (County Flood Control District). 2011. Santa Barbara County Hydrology Report: Precipitation, Rivers/Streams, & Reservoirs, 2010-2011. Accessed: 29 October 2021. Retrieved from:
https://www.countyofsb.org/uploadedFiles/pwd/Content/Water/2011%20Hydrology%20R eport%20-%20Final-WPost(1).pdf
Santa Barbara County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (County Flood Control District). 2021. Rainfall and Reservoir Summary. Accessed: 9 November 2021. Retrieved from:
http://www.countyofsb.org/pwd/water/downloads/hydro/rainfallreports/rainfallreport. pdf
Santa Barbara County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (County Flood Control District). 1998. 1998 Flood Report. Accessed: 29 October 2021. Retrieved from:
https://www.countyofsb.org/uploadedFiles/pwd/Content/Water/1998FloodRpt.pdf Santa Barbara County Planning and Development Department. 2015. Seismic Safety and Safety Element - Santa Barbara County Comprehensive Plan. Accessed: 21 July 2017. Retrieved from:
http://longrange.sbcountyplanning.org/programs/genplanreformat/PDFdocs/Seismic.pdf Santa Barbara County Planning and Development Department. 2015. Seismic Safety and Safety Element - Santa Barbara County Comprehensive Plan. Accessed: 21 July 2017. Retrieved from:
http://longrange.sbcountyplanning.org/programs/genplanreformat/PDFdocs/Seismic.pdf Santa Barbara County Planning and Development Department. 2017. Santa Barbara County Energy Division Map. Accessed: 26 October 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.sbck.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/08/Oil-Gas-Facilites-Map-2017-06-

← All documents from this meeting