Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Santa Barbara City Council
September 29, 2026

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
September 29, 2026
Body
Santa Barbara City Council
Pages
22
Original file
9.9 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on docs.santabarbaraca.gov. That file is the official record.

materials to be adopted as an on-going program in schools with an effort to reach students as well distributing bicycle safety items at no cost to community members in need. The Department will receive $25,000 from this grant. These grants cover the period of October 1, 2026 - September 30, 2027. The grants funds will be used to cover contracts, overtime and benefits for first line supervisors, officers, and staff who are assigned to meet the grant reporting requirements.

Budget/Financial Information
The funding from these grants will increase the department’s Miscellaneous Grants Fund revenue and related expenditure appropriations by $119,775.

A copy of the contract/agreement may be requested from the Police Department for public review by emailing [email protected].

AB 339 Compliance: Staff has reviewed Government Code Section 3504.1 and determined that the noticing provisions do not apply to this contract.

Prepared by: Bryan Kerr, Sergeant
Submitted by: Kelly Gordon, Chief of Police
Approved by: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
1 Resolution No.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
BARBARA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO 26-057, ADOPTING
THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027, TO APPROVE AN

INCREASE OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATIONS
IN FISCAL YEAR 2027 IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT

MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS FUND BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF
$119,775.

SECTION 1. Acceptance of Office of Traffic Safety, Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant;
WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Charter, the City Administrator filed with the Council a proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2026; WHEREAS, the City Council is required to adopt a budget before the beginning of the fiscal year on July 1, 2026;
WHEREAS, the City Charter provides that at any public meeting after the adoption of the budget, the City Council may amend or supplement the budget by motion adopted by the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the total members of the City Council; and WHEREAS, this Resolution adopted by the City Council shall memorialize that action to amend the budget as provided herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA THAT:

Section 1. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1205 of the City Charter, the budget for the fiscal year 2026, as adopted by Resolution No 26-057, is hereby amended as follows:

1. The Council accepts the State of California, Office of traffic Safety Grant, STEP Grant.

2. The Council approves of the increase in revenue and expenditure appropriation of $94,775 in the Fiscal Year 2027 Police Department Miscellaneous Grants Fund.

SECTION 2. Acceptance of Office of Traffic Safety, Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program Grant.

WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Charter, the City Administrator filed with the Council a proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2026; 2 WHEREAS, the City Council is required to adopt a budget before the beginning of the fiscal year on July 1, 2026;
WHEREAS, the City Charter provides that at any public meeting after the adoption of the budget, the City Council may amend or supplement the budget by motion adopted by the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the total members of the City Council; and WHEREAS, this Resolution adopted by the City Council shall memorialize that action to amend the budget as provided herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA THAT:

Section 2. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1205 of the City Charter, the budget for the fiscal year 2027, as adopted by Resolution No 26-057, is hereby amended as follows:

1. The Council accepts the State of California, Office of Traffic Safety Grant.

2. The Council approves of the increase in revenue and expenditure appropriation of $25,000 in the Fiscal Year 2027 Police Department Miscellaneous Grants Fund.

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Council Agenda Report
Agenda Date: September 29, 2026
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Finance Department
Subject: August 2026 Investment Report
Recommendation:

That Council accept the August 2026 Investment Report.

Discussion
The attached investment report includes Investment Activity, Interest Revenue, a Summary of Cash and Investments, and Investment Portfolio detail as of August 31, 2026.

Attachments:

1. August 2026 Investment Report.

2. August 2026 Clean Energy CCA Report.

3. August 2026 PARS Section 115 Trust.

Prepared by: Salvatore Parrilla, Treasury Analyst
Submitted by: Lyndsay Maas, Assistant Finance Director
Approved by: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
Agenda Item No. 5
ENDING BALANCE AS OF August 31, 2026
Yield to
Book Maturity
Description Value (365 days)
US Bank Checking Account $ 31,281,971 0.600%
State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 27,895,392 3.860% Chandler Asset Management - Managed Portfolio 283,182,787 3.950% Total Cash and Investments $ 342,360,150
August 31, 2026
ATTACHMENT 1

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Checking Account, LAIF & Managed Portfolio
Summary of Cash and Investments
City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Portfolio Characteristics
Sector Allocation
Performance Review
Account Summary
Maturity Distribution
Top Issuers
Credit Quality*
Total Rate of Return** 1M 3M YTD 1YR 2YRS 3YRS 5YRS 10YRS Since Inception (08/01/24)
City of Santa Barbara Managed 0.21% 0.21% 0.79% 2.22% 3.62% -- -- -- 3.87% Benchmark Return 0.20% 0.21% 0.59% 1.95% 3.18% -- -- -- 3.54% Average Modified Duration 2.48
Average Coupon 3.62%
Average Purchase YTM 3.95%
Average Market YTM 4.49%
Average Credit Quality* AA+
Average Final Maturity 2.85
Average Life 2.75
End Values as of
07/31/2026
End Values as of
08/31/2026
Market Value 279,415,574.59 280,036,022.24
Accrued Interest 2,169,844.70 2,122,532.44
Total Market Value 281,585,419.29 282,158,554.68
Income Earned 924,171.92 929,199.70
Cont/WD 0.00 0.00
Par 284,756,958.74 285,712,930.55
Book Value 282,215,365.75 283,182,786.99
Cost Value 280,900,995.72 281,818,066.17
United States 42.51%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 10.66%
Federal Home Loan Banks 7.11%
Farm Credit System 3.55%
International Bank for Recon and Dev 2.56%
Eli Lilly and Company 1.49%
Blackrock, Inc. 1.17%
First American Govt Oblig Fund 1.17%
**Periods over 1 year are annualized.

Benchmark: ICE BofA 1-5 Year Unsubordinated US Treasury & Agency Index *The average credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch.

City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

RECONCILIATION SUMMARY
Accrual Activity Summary
Fair Market Activity Summary
Month to Date Fiscal Year to Date
(07/01/2026)
Beginning Book Value 282,215,365.75 281,232,017.99
Maturities/Calls (2,000,000.00) (6,000,000.00)
Principal Paydowns (2,829.33) (5,874.11)
Purchases 8,041,038.61 14,404,747.38
Sales (5,149,474.97) (6,596,371.07)
Change in Cash, Payables, Receivables 2,187.69 (328.08) Amortization/Accretion 75,109.84 147,053.86
Realized Gain (Loss) 1,389.40 1,541.02
Ending Book Value 283,182,786.99 283,182,786.99
Month to Date Fiscal Year to Date
(07/01/2026)
Beginning Market Value 279,415,574.59 279,609,095.54
Maturities/Calls (2,000,000.00) (6,000,000.00)
Principal Paydowns (2,829.33) (5,874.11)
Purchases 8,041,038.61 14,404,747.38
Sales (5,149,474.97) (6,596,371.07)
Change in Cash, Payables, Receivables 2,187.69 (328.08) Amortization/Accretion 75,109.84 147,053.86
Change in Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) (346,973.59) (1,523,842.30) Realized Gain (Loss) 1,389.40 1,541.02
Ending Market Value 280,036,022.24 280,036,022.24
Maturities / Calls
Month to Date (2,000,000.00)
Fiscal Year to Date (6,000,000.00)
Principal Paydowns
Month to Date (2,829.33)
Fiscal Year to Date (5,874.11)
Purchases
Month to Date 8,041,038.61
Fiscal Year to Date 14,404,747.38
Sales
Month to Date (5,149,474.97)
Fiscal Year to Date (6,596,371.07)
Interest Received
Month to Date 953,887.49
Fiscal Year to Date 1,876,757.34
Purchased / Sold Interest
Month to Date (52,485.37)
Fiscal Year to Date (48,956.78)
City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
362962AD4 GMALT 2025-2 A3 4.58
05/22/2028 1,240,000.00 05/20/20254.84%
1,239,979.42
1,239,988.11
100.13

4.35%
1,241,628.12
1,735.31

0.44%
1,640.01
NA/AAA
AAA

1.73 0.48
096912AD2 BMWLT 2025-1 A3 4.43
06/26/2028 680,000.00 06/03/20254.82%
679,985.04
679,991.07
100.07

4.35%
680,461.04
502.07

0.24%
469.97
NA/AAA
AAA

1.82 0.57
05594HAD5 BMWLT 2025-2 A3 3.97
09/25/2028 1,420,000.00 10/08/20254.32%
1,419,996.02
1,419,997.21

99.62 4.46%
1,414,626.72
939.57

0.51%
(5,370.49)
NA/AAA
AAA

2.07 0.83
89240NAD4 TLOT 2025-B A3 3.96 11/20/2028 1,800,000.00 09/09/2025

3.97%
1,799,677.80
1,799,774.74

99.30 4.61%
1,787,482.80
2,178.00

0.64%
(12,291.94)
Aaa/NA
AAA

2.22 1.13
58768YAD7 MBALT 2025-A A3 4.61
04/16/2029 1,355,000.00 05/14/20254.66%
1,354,834.83
1,354,889.04
100.16

4.52%
1,357,172.07
2,776.24

0.48%
2,283.03
NA/AAA
AAA

2.62 1.17
44935XAD7 HART 2025-B A3 4.36
12/17/2029 1,030,000.00 06/03/20254.36%
1,029,906.99
1,029,932.19

99.87 4.52%
1,028,697.05
1,995.91

0.37%
(1,235.14)
NA/AAA
AAA

3.30 1.04
362549AD9 GMCAR 2025-2 A3 4.28
04/16/2030 650,000.00 05/06/20254.71%
649,904.32
649,929.60

99.88 4.48%
649,192.70
1,159.17

0.23%
(736.90)
Aaa/AAA
NA

3.62 0.77
92970QAJ4 WFCIT 2025-1 A 4.34
05/15/2030 2,135,000.00 06/03/20254.33%
2,134,964.56
2,134,973.38

99.77 4.52%
2,130,061.75
4,118.18

0.76%
(4,911.64)
NA/AAA
AAA

3.70 1.61
17305EHA6 CCCIT 2025-A1 A1 4.3
06/21/2030 2,105,000.00 06/18/20254.31%
2,104,428.91
2,104,564.39

99.57 4.55%
2,095,973.76
17,600.14

0.75%
(8,590.63)
Aaa/AAA
NA

3.80 1.70
58769MAD2 MBART 261 A3 4.36 10/15/2030 1,415,000.00 05/12/2026

4.41%
1,414,691.81
1,414,711.73

99.52 4.70%
1,408,176.87
2,741.96

0.50%
(6,534.86)
NA/AAA
AAA

4.12 1.63
Total ABS 13,830,000.00 4.41%
13,828,369.70
13,828,751.45

99.74 4.52%
13,793,472.87
35,746.54

4.93%
(35,278.58)

2.99 1.21
AGENCY
3133EM4S8 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 0.87 09/08/2026 2,000,000.00 09/08/2021

0.87%
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00

99.91 5.28%
1,998,280.00
8,361.67

0.71%
(1,720.00)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

0.02 0.02
3130ANXS4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 0.9
09/28/2026 2,000,000.00 09/28/20210.90%
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00

99.78 3.83%
1,995,594.00
7,650.00

0.71%
(4,406.00)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

0.08 0.07
3130APHA6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

1.25 10/28/2026 2,000,000.00 10/28/20211.12%
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00

99.58 3.89%
1,991,650.00
8,541.67

0.71%
(8,350.00)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

0.16 0.16
3133ENLZ1 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 1.78 01/26/2027 3,000,000.00 01/27/20221.78% 3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00

99.14 3.95%
2,974,158.00
5,191.67

1.06%
(25,842.00)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

0.41 0.40
3130AQMX8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

2.25 01/26/2027 3,000,000.00 01/26/20221.79%
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00

99.27 4.08%
2,978,160.00
6,562.50

1.06%
(21,840.00)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

0.41 0.40
City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
3133ENPB0 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 2.18 02/16/2027 3,000,000.00 02/16/20222.18% 3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00

99.16 4.04%
2,974,827.00
2,725.00

1.06%
(25,173.00)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

0.46 0.45
3133EPEE1 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.0 03/29/2027 2,000,000.00 03/29/20234.00% 2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00

99.90 4.18%
1,997,920.00
33,777.78

0.71%
(2,080.00)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

0.57 0.56
3130ARCB5 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

2.375 03/29/2027 3,000,000.00 03/29/20222.37%
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00

99.04 4.07%
2,971,260.00
30,083.33

1.06%
(28,740.00)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

0.57 0.56
3134GXVN1

FEDERAL HOME LOAN
MORTGAGE CORP 3.5
06/23/2027
3,000,000.00 06/23/2022

3.50%
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00

99.50 4.13%
2,984,931.00
19,833.33

1.07%
(15,069.00)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

0.81 0.79
3130AWWN6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.5
09/10/2027 2,000,000.00 08/24/20234.51%
1,999,120.00
1,999,777.32
100.22

4.27%
2,004,476.00
42,750.00

0.72%
4,698.68
Aa1/AA+
AA+

1.03 0.97
3130AWC24 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.0
06/09/2028 2,000,000.00 06/26/20234.07%
1,993,600.00
1,997,712.27

99.39 4.36%
1,987,896.00
18,222.22

0.71%
(9,816.27)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

1.77 1.68
3130ATHX8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

4.125 09/14/2029 3,000,000.00 10/17/20243.93%
3,025,380.00
3,015,706.71

99.13 4.43%
2,973,849.00
57,406.25

1.06%
(41,857.71)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

3.04 2.77
3130ATUT2 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.5
12/14/2029 3,000,000.00 12/16/20244.29%
3,028,440.00
3,018,720.79
100.13

4.46%
3,003,804.00
28,875.00

1.07%
(14,916.79)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

3.29 3.00
Total Agency 33,000,000.00 2.74%
33,046,540.00
33,031,917.08

99.51 4.21%
32,836,805.00
269,980.42

11.73%
(195,112.08)

1.04 0.97

AGENCY CMBS
3137FLMV3 FHMS K-090 A2 3.422
02/25/2029 1,357,000.00 02/12/20254.73%
1,292,065.43
1,317,247.81

97.10 4.63%
1,317,698.57
3,869.71

0.47%
450.75
Aa1/AAA
AA+

2.49 2.28
3137FLN91 FHMS K-091 A2 3.505
03/25/2029 2,570,000.00 09/20/2024

3.80%
2,537,272.66
2,551,552.95

97.26 4.63%
2,499,517.75
7,506.54

0.89%
(52,035.20)
Aa1/AAA
AA+

2.56 2.30
3137FMCR1 FHMS K-093 A2 2.982
05/25/2029 2,441,397.10 09/19/20243.82%
2,355,376.00
2,391,576.54

95.93 4.65%
2,341,995.62
6,066.87

0.84%
(49,580.93)
Aa1/AA+
AAA

2.73 2.39
3137FNAE0 FHMS K-095 A2 2.785
06/25/2029 1,000,000.00 03/13/20254.39%
938,828.13
960,015.26

95.18 4.66%
951,829.00
2,320.83

0.34%
(8,186.26)
Aa1/AA+
AAA

2.82 2.54
3137FMTY8 FHMS K-094 A2 2.903
06/25/2029 3,000,000.00 12/05/20253.87%
2,903,554.69
2,923,694.96

95.41 4.66%
2,862,390.00
7,257.50

1.02%
(61,304.96)
Aa1/AA+
AAA

2.82 2.57
3137FPHK4 FHMS K-098 A2 2.425
08/25/2029 2,100,000.00 10/01/20243.83%
1,970,718.74
2,021,858.94

93.91 4.67%
1,972,124.70
4,243.75

0.70%
(49,734.24)
Aa1/AA+
AAA

2.98 2.72
3137H9D71 FHMS K-750 A2 3.0 09/25/2029 2,500,000.00 11/15/2024

4.62%
2,336,718.75
2,397,505.01

95.75 4.67%
2,393,715.00
6,250.00

0.85%
(3,790.01)
Aa1/AA+
AAA

3.07 2.50
City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
3137FPJG1 FHMS K-099 A2 2.595
09/25/2029 2,800,000.00 06/06/20254.38%
2,609,140.63
2,664,431.71

94.21 4.68%
2,637,770.80
6,055.00

0.94%
(26,660.91)
Aa1/AA+
AAA

3.07 2.79
3137FQ3Z4 FHMS K-101 A2 2.524
10/25/2029 2,480,000.00 03/17/20254.42%
2,287,218.75
2,348,918.06

93.78 4.68%
2,325,758.88
5,216.27

0.83%
(23,159.18)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

3.15 2.90
3137FRUT6 FHMS K-106 A2 2.069
01/25/2030 2,700,000.00 07/14/20254.28%
2,457,843.75
2,518,940.26

91.84 4.70%
2,479,747.50
4,655.25

0.89%
(39,192.76)
Aa1/AA+
AAA

3.40 3.18
3137HA4B9 FHMS K-751 A2 4.412
03/25/2030 2,500,000.00 03/25/20254.41%
2,496,972.66
2,497,851.08

98.99 4.70%
2,474,835.00
9,191.67

0.88%
(23,016.08)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.56 2.93
3137F9Z79 FHMS K-125 A2 1.846
01/25/2031 2,950,000.00 07/29/2026

4.63%
2,623,656.25
2,630,122.50

88.69 4.75%
2,616,301.90
4,538.08

0.93%
(13,820.60)
Aa1/AA+
AAA

4.40 4.07
Total Agency CMBS 28,398,397.10 4.24%
26,809,366.44
27,223,715.10

94.71 4.68%
26,873,684.71
67,171.48

9.60%
(350,030.39)

3.13 2.80
CASH
CCYUSD Receivable 7,126.35 -- 7,126.35
7,126.35

1.00 7,126.35

0.00 0.00%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Cash 7,126.35
7,126.35
7,126.35

1.00 7,126.35

0.00 0.00%

0.00 0.00

0.00 CORPORATE
66815L2T5

NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL
GLOBAL FUNDING 4.11
09/12/2027
2,440,000.00 09/05/2024

4.11%
2,439,926.80
2,439,974.86

99.63 4.48%
2,430,884.16
47,077.77

0.87%
(9,090.70)
Aa1/AA+
AAA

1.03 0.98
64953BBW7 NEW YORK LIFE GLOBAL
FUNDING 4.4 04/25/2028 1,880,000.00 04/22/20254.43%
1,878,684.00
1,879,277.16

99.66 4.62%
1,873,517.76
28,952.00

0.67%
(5,759.40)
Aa1/AA+
AAA

1.65 1.55
69371RU20 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 4.0
11/07/2028 1,515,000.00 11/05/2025

4.02%
1,514,151.60
1,514,382.28

98.79 4.59%
1,496,624.57
19,190.00

0.53%
(17,757.71)
A1/A+
NA

2.19 2.04
61690DK72 MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA

5.016 01/12/2029 3,250,000.00 02/13/20254.93%
3,257,345.00
3,253,444.27
100.44

4.64%
3,264,283.75
22,188.83

1.17%
10,839.48
Aa3/A+
AA

2.37 1.30
693475CG8 THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES
GROUP, INC. 4.075 01/26/2029 2,000,000.00 01/27/20264.03% 2,001,820.00
2,001,280.00

99.27 4.48%
1,985,352.00
7,923.61

0.71%
(15,928.00)
A3/AA2.41

1.34 09247XAP6 BLACKROCK FINANCE INC 3.25
04/30/2029 3,400,000.00 07/29/20244.60%
3,205,996.00
3,291,313.03

96.62 4.61%
3,285,049.40
37,140.28

1.17%
(6,263.63)
Aa3/AANA2.66

2.49 89236TMF9 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP

5.05 05/16/2029 3,250,000.00 12/04/20244.55%
3,314,675.00
3,289,370.86
100.81

4.73%
3,276,214.50
47,869.79

1.17%
(13,156.36)
A1/A+
A+

2.71 2.47
City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
38151LAJ9 GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA

4.656 06/03/2029 910,000.00 05/27/20264.57%
910,000.00
910,000.00

99.68 4.68%
907,129.86
10,357.01

0.32%
(2,870.14)
A1/A+
AA2.761.65
24422EXT1 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 4.85
06/11/2029 3,250,000.00 07/18/20244.62%
3,281,980.00
3,268,136.31
100.57

4.63%
3,268,629.00
35,027.78

1.17%
492.69
A1/A
A+

2.78 2.55
437076DC3 HOME DEPOT INC 4.75
06/25/2029 3,250,000.00 07/18/20244.59%
3,272,652.50
3,262,752.42
100.28

4.64%
3,259,031.75
28,302.08

1.16%
(3,720.67)
A2/A
A

2.82 2.52
025816EJ4 AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY

4.351 07/20/2029 2,245,000.00 07/21/20254.35%
2,245,000.00
2,245,000.00

99.31 4.65%
2,229,496.03
11,124.66

0.80%
(15,503.97)
A2/AA2.88

1.78 532457CQ9 ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 4.2
08/14/2029 3,275,000.00 08/12/2024

4.24%
3,268,882.55
3,271,388.49

98.92 4.59%
3,239,761.00
6,495.42

1.16%
(31,627.49)
Aa3/AANA2.95

2.74 171239AL0 CHUBB INA HOLDINGS LLC 4.65
08/15/2029 2,800,000.00 08/15/20244.47%
2,821,364.00
2,812,480.20

99.77 4.73%
2,793,602.00
5,786.67

1.00%
(18,878.20)
A2/A
A

2.96 2.73
14913UAQ3

CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL
SERVICES CORP 4.375
08/16/2029
3,275,000.00 08/12/2024

4.40%
3,270,820.05
3,272,527.74

99.23 4.66%
3,249,635.13
5,970.05

1.16%
(22,892.62)
A1/A
A+

2.96 2.74
69371RT48 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 4.0
09/26/2029 1,600,000.00 09/23/20244.05%
1,596,704.00
1,597,976.55

98.43 4.55%
1,574,859.20
27,555.56

0.56%
(23,117.35)
A1/A+
NA

3.07 2.80
857449AE2 STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST
CO 4.782 11/23/2029 2,750,000.00 12/09/20244.56%
2,776,977.50
2,767,582.35
100.21

4.71%
2,755,731.00
35,798.58

0.98%
(11,851.35)
Aa2/AAAA+3.23

2.92 59217GFT1 METROPOLITAN LIFE GLOBAL
FUNDING I 4.9 01/09/2030 3,100,000.00 --

4.96%
3,092,094.00
3,094,643.47

99.70 4.99%
3,090,827.10
21,941.11

1.10%
(3,816.37)
Aa3/AAAA3.36

3.04 06406RCG0 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
CORP 4.026 01/22/2030 1,925,000.00 01/14/20264.05%
1,925,470.40
1,925,375.12

98.30 5.26%
1,892,315.43
8,395.89

0.68%
(33,059.69)
Aa3/A
AA3.392.24
95000U4D2 WELLS FARGO & CO 4.182
01/23/2030 2,000,000.00 01/27/2026

4.17%
2,000,380.00
2,000,304.77

98.37 4.77%
1,967,422.00
8,828.67

0.70%
(32,882.77)
A1/BBB+
A+

3.40 2.24
12572QAL9 CME GROUP INC. 4.4
03/15/2030 2,000,000.00 11/13/20254.12%
2,021,360.00
2,017,360.15

98.76 4.78%
1,975,230.00
40,577.78

0.71%
(42,130.15)
Aa3/AAAA3.54

3.17 743315AW3 PROGRESSIVE CORP 3.2
03/26/2030 2,500,000.00 04/25/20254.49%
2,359,625.00
2,398,065.67

94.47 4.91%
2,361,762.50
34,444.44

0.84%
(36,303.17)
A2/A
A

3.57 3.27
06051GMY2

BANK OF AMERICA
CORPORATION 4.477
04/23/2030
2,100,000.00 05/20/2026

4.66%
2,085,300.00
2,086,356.59

98.83 4.85%
2,075,369.10
33,428.27

0.74%
(10,987.49)
A1/AAA3.64

2.42 74464AAC5 PUBLIC STORAGE OPERATING CO

4.375 07/01/2030 1,700,000.00 07/17/20254.58%
1,684,598.00
1,688,088.78

98.38 4.84%
1,672,528.00
12,395.83

0.60%
(15,560.78)
A2/A
NA

3.83 3.46
713448GH5 PEPSICO, INC. 4.3 07/23/2030 2,000,000.00 09/19/2025

4.08%
2,018,440.00
2,014,783.88

98.88 4.62%
1,977,692.00
9,077.78

0.71%
(37,091.88)
A1/A+
NA

3.89 3.53
City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
58933YBQ7 MERCK & CO INC 4.15
09/15/2030 2,000,000.00 09/23/20254.07%
2,007,100.00
2,005,740.43

97.58 4.82%
1,951,664.00
38,272.22

0.70%
(54,076.43)
Aa3/A+
NA

4.04 3.60
02079KAW7 ALPHABET INC 4.1 11/15/2030 2,100,000.00 11/14/2025

4.04%
2,105,565.00
2,104,671.12

97.01 4.89%
2,037,239.40
25,351.67

0.73%
(67,431.72)
Aa2/AA+
NA

4.21 3.76
023135CT1 AMAZON.COM INC 4.1
11/20/2030 2,000,000.00 12/29/20254.03%
2,006,040.00
2,005,196.81

96.89 4.92%
1,937,834.00
23,005.56

0.69%
(67,362.81)
A1/AA
AA4.223.77
92826CAZ5 VISA INC. 4.1 02/12/2031 1,815,000.00 02/03/2026

4.13%
1,812,567.90
1,812,835.62

97.81 4.65%
1,775,331.36
3,927.46

0.63%
(37,504.26)
Aa3/AANA4.45

4.00 00287YEE5 ABBVIE INC 4.125 03/15/2031 2,150,000.00 08/27/2026

4.85%
2,086,940.50
2,087,092.45

96.66 4.95%
2,078,241.60
43,604.69

0.74%
(8,850.85)
A2/ANA4.54

3.99 91159HJV3 U.S. BANCORP 5.083 05/15/2031 2,100,000.00 05/15/2026

4.82%
2,120,055.00
2,118,596.95

99.96 5.07%
2,099,073.90
31,429.88

0.75%
(19,523.05)
A3/A
A+

4.70 3.29
532457DL9 ELI LILLY AND CO 4.375
05/20/2031 955,000.00 05/06/20264.40%
953,978.15
954,036.35

97.89 4.88%
934,844.73
11,721.96

0.33%
(19,191.62)
Aa3/AANA4.72

4.16 57636QBL7 MASTERCARD INCORPORATED

4.6 06/08/2031 2,385,000.00 06/04/20264.62%
2,383,092.00
2,383,180.82

98.69 4.91%
2,353,742.19
25,294.25

0.84%
(29,438.63)
Aa3/A+
NA

4.77 4.19
023135EC6 AMAZON.COM INC 4.8
07/09/2031 1,245,000.00 07/07/20264.83%
1,243,418.85
1,243,465.61

99.08 5.01%
1,233,603.27
8,632.00

0.44%
(9,862.34)
A1/AA
AA4.854.25
Total Corporate 75,165,000.00 4.44%
74,963,003.80
75,016,681.12

98.88 4.75%
74,304,521.67
757,089.54

26.53%
(712,159.45)

3.25 2.75

MONEY MARKET
FUND
31846V807 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 3,282,407.10 --

3.30%
3,282,407.10
3,282,407.10

1.00 3.30%
3,282,407.10

0.00 1.17%

0.00 Aaa/
AAAm
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Money
Market Fund 3,282,407.10 3.30%
3,282,407.10
3,282,407.10

1.00 3.30%
3,282,407.10

0.00 1.17%

0.00 0.00

0.00 MUNICIPAL
BONDS
13063EGT7 CALIFORNIA STATE 4.5
08/01/2029 2,715,000.00 10/30/20244.38%
2,729,308.05
2,723,808.13

99.91 4.53%
2,712,564.65
10,181.25

0.97%
(11,243.49)
Aa2/AAAA2.92

2.70 Total Municipal
Bonds 2,715,000.00 4.38%
2,729,308.05
2,723,808.13

99.91 4.53%
2,712,564.65
10,181.25

0.97%
(11,243.49)

2.92 2.70
City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration

SUPRANATIONAL
459058LN1

INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR

RECONSTRUCTION AND
DEVELOPM 3.875 10/16/2029
3,865,000.00 --

3.98%
3,846,482.35
3,853,399.32

98.36 4.44%
3,801,509.65
56,158.45

1.36%
(51,889.67)
Aaa/AAA
NA

3.13 2.87
459058LY7

INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR

RECONSTRUCTION AND
DEVELOPM 3.5 10/28/2030
3,500,000.00 10/27/2025

3.69%
3,469,900.00
3,474,977.11

96.25 4.50%
3,368,743.00
41,854.17

1.20%
(106,234.11)
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.16 3.77
Total
Supranational 7,365,000.00 3.84%
7,316,382.35
7,328,376.43

97.37 4.47%
7,170,252.65
98,012.62

2.56%
(158,123.78)

3.61 3.29

US TREASURY
91282CCZ2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.875
09/30/2026 2,000,000.00 10/08/20211.02%
1,986,406.25
1,999,783.16

99.75 3.97%
1,995,082.00
7,363.39

0.71%
(4,701.16)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

0.08 0.08
912828YU8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.625
11/30/2026 2,000,000.00 02/28/20221.86%
1,978,437.50
1,998,882.13

99.45 3.87%
1,988,986.00
8,258.20

0.71%
(9,896.13)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

0.25 0.24
912828YX2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.75
12/31/2026 2,000,000.00 03/17/20222.17%
1,961,956.00
1,997,369.53

99.28 3.95%
1,985,626.00
5,991.85

0.71%
(11,743.53)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

0.33 0.32
9128283W8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.75
02/15/2028 5,000,000.00 12/09/20244.10%
4,800,781.25
4,908,791.42

97.82 4.31%
4,891,210.00
6,351.90

1.75%
(17,581.42)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

1.46 1.40
91282CGT2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
03/31/2028 2,000,000.00 01/25/20244.07%
1,966,020.00
1,987,160.14

98.94 4.33%
1,978,750.00
30,505.46

0.71%
(8,410.14)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

1.58 1.49
91282CHA2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.5
04/30/2028 2,000,000.00 01/25/20244.06%
1,956,484.36
1,983,035.33

98.68 4.33%
1,973,516.00
23,586.96

0.70%
(9,519.33)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

1.67 1.58
91282CHE4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
05/31/2028 2,000,000.00 01/25/20244.07%
1,965,180.00
1,986,010.60

98.80 4.34%
1,976,094.00
18,422.13

0.71%
(9,916.60)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

1.75 1.66
91282CQS3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
05/31/2028 3,000,000.00 06/18/20264.15%
2,991,562.50
2,992,407.44

99.44 4.33%
2,983,242.00
30,491.80

1.07%
(9,165.44)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

1.75 1.65
91282CHQ7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
07/31/2028 3,000,000.00 01/25/20244.06%
3,007,950.00
3,003,369.95

99.60 4.34%
2,988,048.00
10,760.87

1.07%
(15,321.95)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

1.92 1.81
91282CHX2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.375
08/31/2028 2,000,000.00 02/23/20244.35%
2,002,000.00
2,000,884.31
100.06

4.34%
2,001,172.00
241.71

0.71%
287.69
Aa1/AA+
AA+

2.00 1.89
91282CJN2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.375
11/30/2028 2,000,000.00 02/23/20244.33%
2,003,722.00
2,001,754.17
100.01

4.37%
2,000,156.00
22,233.61

0.71%
(1,598.17)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

2.25 2.10
91282CDW8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.75
01/31/2029 5,000,000.00 10/29/20244.16%
4,535,156.25
4,735,870.64

94.02 4.39%
4,700,975.00
7,608.70

1.68%
(34,895.64)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

2.42 2.32
City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CEB3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.875
02/28/2029 3,000,000.00 11/12/20244.30%
2,717,226.56
2,835,710.07

94.13 4.38%
2,823,750.00
155.39

1.01%
(11,960.07)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

2.50 2.40
91282CKG5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
03/31/2029 5,000,000.00 12/09/20244.09%
5,005,664.06
5,003,394.11

99.37 4.39%
4,968,360.00
86,782.79

1.77%
(35,034.11)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

2.58 2.38
9128286T2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.375
05/15/2029 5,000,000.00 10/29/20244.14%
4,637,304.69
4,784,089.10

94.90 4.40%
4,744,920.00
35,173.23

1.69%
(39,169.10)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

2.70 2.56
91282CKT7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.5
05/31/2029 2,000,000.00 01/13/20254.59%
1,992,812.50
1,995,488.70
100.25

4.40%
2,005,000.00
22,868.85

0.72%
9,511.30
Aa1/AA+
AA+

2.75 2.53
91282CEV9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.25
06/30/2029 5,000,000.00 10/23/2024

4.07%
4,825,585.94
4,894,637.59

96.95 4.41%
4,847,655.00
27,819.29

1.73%
(46,982.59)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

2.83 2.65
91282CFC0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.625
07/31/2029 5,500,000.00 10/04/20243.79%
5,221,347.66
5,331,350.35

95.17 4.41%
5,234,454.50
12,554.35

1.87%
(96,895.85)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

2.91 2.75
91282CLK5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
08/31/2029 5,400,000.00 09/20/20243.53%
5,422,781.25
5,413,835.53

97.80 4.42%
5,281,032.60
540.75

1.89%
(132,802.93)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

3.00 2.80
91282CLN9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.5
09/30/2029 4,000,000.00 10/03/20243.61%
3,979,218.75
3,987,168.55

97.38 4.42%
3,895,156.00
58,907.10

1.39%
(92,012.55)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

3.08 2.84
91282CFT3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
10/31/2029 5,000,000.00 12/09/20244.08%
4,981,250.00
4,987,863.94

98.75 4.43%
4,937,305.00
67,391.30

1.76%
(50,558.94)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

3.17 2.90
91282CMA6 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
11/30/2029 3,000,000.00 12/04/20244.08%
3,006,210.94
3,004,045.13

99.08 4.43%
2,972,343.00
31,444.67

1.06%
(31,702.13)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

3.25 2.97
91282CMU2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
03/31/2030 2,500,000.00 05/22/20254.11%
2,488,378.91
2,491,433.30

98.54 4.45%
2,463,380.00
42,076.50

0.88%
(28,053.30)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

3.58 3.24
91282CMZ1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.875
04/30/2030 3,250,000.00 04/29/20253.78%
3,263,837.89
3,260,132.12

98.07 4.45%
3,187,411.50
42,435.46

1.14%
(72,720.62)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

3.66 3.33
91282CNG2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
05/31/2030 2,000,000.00 06/06/20254.11%
1,990,078.13
1,992,529.93

98.44 4.45%
1,968,828.00
20,327.87

0.70%
(23,701.93)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

3.75 3.40
91282CNN7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.875
07/31/2030 6,000,000.00 08/15/20253.85%
6,007,500.00
6,005,927.82

97.91 4.46%
5,874,612.00
20,217.39

2.10%
(131,315.82)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

3.91 3.57
91282CNX5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
08/31/2030 5,000,000.00 09/18/20253.66%
4,992,382.81
4,993,845.55

96.93 4.47%
4,846,680.00
500.69

1.73%
(147,165.55)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

4.00 3.67
91282CPA3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
09/30/2030 5,000,000.00 03/26/20264.03%
4,917,773.44
4,925,656.81

96.88 4.47%
4,843,750.00
76,263.66

1.73%
(81,906.81)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

4.08 3.68
91282CPN5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.5
11/30/2030 2,800,000.00 12/29/20253.68%
2,777,906.25
2,780,920.15

96.24 4.48%
2,694,672.40
24,901.64

0.96%
(86,247.75)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

4.25 3.85
91282CPW5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.75
01/31/2031 2,250,000.00 02/26/2026

3.59%
2,266,171.88
2,264,499.86

97.07 4.49%
2,184,169.50
7,336.96

0.78%
(80,330.36)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

4.42 4.00
City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CQD6 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.5
02/28/2031 5,750,000.00 03/05/20263.72%
5,692,275.39
5,697,952.70

96.05 4.48%
5,522,696.75
555.94

1.97%
(175,255.95)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

4.50 4.10
91282CQG9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.875
03/31/2031 4,000,000.00 04/17/20263.84%
4,006,406.25
4,005,930.92

97.48 4.49%
3,899,376.00
65,218.58

1.39%
(106,554.92)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

4.58 4.07
91282CQU8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
05/31/2031 5,500,000.00 06/16/20264.17%
5,488,613.28
5,489,091.66

98.43 4.50%
5,413,419.00
57,648.57

1.93%
(75,672.66)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

4.75 4.22
91282CRA1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.375
07/31/2031 3,000,000.00 08/27/20264.38%
2,999,179.69
2,999,181.51

99.45 4.50%
2,983,359.00
11,413.04

1.07%
(15,822.51)
Aa1/AA+
AA+

4.91 4.36
Total US Treasury 121,950,000.00 3.87%
119,835,562.38
120,740,004.23

97.65 4.40%
119,055,187.25
884,350.60

42.51%
(1,684,816.98)

3.05 2.81
Total Portfolio 285,712,930.55 3.95%
281,818,066.17
283,182,786.99

96.89 4.49%
280,036,022.24
2,122,532.44
100.00%
(3,146,764.74)

2.85 2.48
Total Market Value
+ Accrued 282,158,554.68
City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

TRANSACTION LEDGER
Transaction Type Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/
Disp
Yield
Amount Interest Pur/
Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss

ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 08/03/2026 31846V807 61,087.50 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.29% (61,087.50) 0.00 (61,087.50) 0.00 Purchase 08/04/2026 31846V807 4,938.66 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.29% (4,938.66) 0.00 (4,938.66) 0.00 Purchase 08/12/2026 31846V807 37,207.50 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.28% (37,207.50) 0.00 (37,207.50) 0.00 Purchase 08/14/2026 31846V807 68,775.00 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.28% (68,775.00) 0.00 (68,775.00) 0.00 Purchase 08/17/2026 31846V807 260,001.17 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.29% (260,001.17) 0.00 (260,001.17) 0.00 Purchase 08/17/2026 31846V807 2,318.33 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.29% (2,318.33) 0.00 (2,318.33) 0.00 Purchase 08/20/2026 31846V807 5,940.00 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.27% (5,940.00) 0.00 (5,940.00) 0.00 Purchase 08/20/2026 31846V807 4,732.67 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.27% (4,732.67) 0.00 (4,732.67) 0.00 Purchase 08/25/2026 31846V807 12,092.76 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.29% (12,092.76) 0.00 (12,092.76) 0.00 Purchase 08/25/2026 31846V807 63,324.83 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.29% (63,324.83) 0.00 (63,324.83) 0.00 Purchase 08/27/2026 31846V807 66,000.00 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.29% (66,000.00) 0.00 (66,000.00) 0.00 Purchase 08/28/2026 00287YEE5 2,150,000.00 ABBVIE INC 4.125 03/15/2031 97.067 4.85% (2,086,940.50) (42,865.63) (2,129,806.13) 0.00 Purchase 08/28/2026 91282CRA1 3,000,000.00

UNITED STATES
TREASURY 4.375
07/31/2031

99.973 4.38% (2,999,179.69) (9,986.41) (3,009,166.10) 0.00 Purchase 08/31/2026 31846V807 2,368,500.00 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.30% (2,368,500.00) 0.00 (2,368,500.00) 0.00 Total Purchase 8,104,918.42 (8,041,038.61) (52,852.04) (8,093,890.65) 0.00 TOTAL
ACQUISITIONS 8,104,918.42 (8,041,038.61) (52,852.04) (8,093,890.65) 0.00

DISPOSITIONS
Maturity 08/31/2026 91282CCW9 (2,000,000.00)

UNITED STATES
TREASURY 0.75
08/31/2026
100.000 1.00% 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00
Total Maturity (2,000,000.00) 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Sale 08/18/2026 31846V807 (10,869.41) FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.28% 10,869.41 0.00 10,869.41 0.00 Sale 08/28/2026 74153WCU1 (3,000,000.00)

PRICOA GLOBAL
FUNDING I 4.4
08/27/2027
100.039 4.41% 3,001,170.00 (366.67) 3,001,536.67 1,389.40 Sale 08/28/2026 31846V807 (2,137,435.56) FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 1.000 3.29% 2,137,435.56 0.00 2,137,435.56 0.00 City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

TRANSACTION LEDGER
Transaction Type Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/
Disp
Yield
Amount Interest Pur/
Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
Total Sale (5,148,304.97) 5,149,474.97 (366.67) 5,149,841.64 1,389.40 TOTAL
DISPOSITIONS (7,148,304.97) 7,149,474.97 (366.67) 7,149,841.64 1,389.40 OTHER

TRANSACTIONS
Coupon 08/01/2026 3137FLMV3 0.00 FHMS K-090 A2 3.422
02/25/2029 4.73% 3,869.71 0.00 3,869.71 0.00
Coupon 08/01/2026 3137F9Z79 0.00 FHMS K-125 A2 1.846
01/25/2031 4.63% 4,538.08 0.00 4,538.08 0.00
Coupon 08/01/2026 3137H9D71 0.00 FHMS K-750 A2 3.0
09/25/2029 4.62% 6,250.00 0.00 6,250.00 0.00
Coupon 08/01/2026 3137FQ3Z4 0.00 FHMS K-101 A2 2.524
10/25/2029 4.42% 5,216.27 0.00 5,216.27 0.00
Coupon 08/01/2026 3137HA4B9 0.00 FHMS K-751 A2 4.412
03/25/2030 4.41% 9,191.67 0.00 9,191.67 0.00
Coupon 08/01/2026 3137FNAE0 0.00 FHMS K-095 A2 2.785
06/25/2029 4.39% 2,320.83 0.00 2,320.83 0.00
Coupon 08/01/2026 3137FPJG1 0.00 FHMS K-099 A2 2.595
09/25/2029 4.38% 6,055.00 0.00 6,055.00 0.00
Coupon 08/01/2026 13063EGT7 0.00 CALIFORNIA STATE 4.5
08/01/2029 4.38% 61,087.50 0.00 61,087.50 0.00
Coupon 08/01/2026 3137FRUT6 0.00 FHMS K-106 A2 2.069
01/25/2030 4.28% 4,655.25 0.00 4,655.25 0.00
Coupon 08/01/2026 3137FMTY8 0.00 FHMS K-094 A2 2.903
06/25/2029 3.87% 7,257.50 0.00 7,257.50 0.00
Coupon 08/01/2026 3137FPHK4 0.00 FHMS K-098 A2 2.425
08/25/2029 3.83% 4,243.75 0.00 4,243.75 0.00
Coupon 08/01/2026 3137FMCR1 0.00 FHMS K-093 A2 2.982
05/25/2029 3.82% 6,073.90 0.00 6,073.90 0.00
Coupon 08/01/2026 3137FLN91 0.00 FHMS K-091 A2 3.505
03/25/2029 3.80% 7,506.54 0.00 7,506.54 0.00
City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

TRANSACTION LEDGER
Transaction Type Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/
Disp
Yield
Amount Interest Pur/
Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
Coupon 08/12/2026 92826CAZ5 0.00 VISA INC. 4.1
02/12/2031 4.13% 37,207.50 0.00 37,207.50 0.00
Coupon 08/14/2026 532457CQ9 0.00

ELI LILLY AND
COMPANY 4.2
08/14/2029

4.24% 68,775.00 0.00 68,775.00 0.00
Coupon 08/15/2026 58768YAD7 0.00 MBALT 2025-A A3 4.61
04/16/2029 4.66% 5,205.46 0.00 5,205.46 0.00
Coupon 08/15/2026 171239AL0 0.00 CHUBB INA HOLDINGS
LLC 4.65 08/15/2029 4.47% 65,100.00 0.00 65,100.00 0.00 Coupon 08/15/2026 58769MAD2 0.00 MBART 261 A3 4.36
10/15/2030 4.41% 5,141.17 0.00 5,141.17 0.00
Coupon 08/15/2026 44935XAD7 0.00 HART 2025-B A3 4.36
12/17/2029 4.36% 3,742.33 0.00 3,742.33 0.00
Coupon 08/15/2026 92970QAJ4 0.00 WFCIT 2025-1 A 4.34
05/15/2030 4.33% 7,721.58 0.00 7,721.58 0.00
Coupon 08/15/2026 9128283W8 0.00

UNITED STATES
TREASURY 2.75
02/15/2028

4.10% 68,750.00 0.00 68,750.00 0.00
Coupon 08/16/2026 362549AD9 0.00 GMCAR 2025-2 A3 4.28
04/16/2030 4.71% 2,318.33 0.00 2,318.33 0.00
Coupon 08/16/2026 14913UAQ3 0.00

CATERPILLAR

FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORP 4.375
08/16/2029

4.40% 71,640.63 0.00 71,640.63 0.00
Coupon 08/16/2026 3133ENPB0 0.00

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT

BANKS FUNDING CORP

2.18 02/16/2027

2.18% 32,700.00 0.00 32,700.00 0.00
Coupon 08/20/2026 362962AD4 0.00 GMALT 2025-2 A3 4.58
05/22/2028 4.84% 4,732.67 0.00 4,732.67 0.00
Coupon 08/20/2026 89240NAD4 0.00 TLOT 2025-B A3 3.96
11/20/2028 3.97% 5,940.00 0.00 5,940.00 0.00
Coupon 08/25/2026 096912AD2 0.00 BMWLT 2025-1 A3 4.43
06/26/2028 4.82% 2,510.33 0.00 2,510.33 0.00
City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

TRANSACTION LEDGER
Transaction Type Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/
Disp
Yield
Amount Interest Pur/
Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
Coupon 08/25/2026 05594HAD5 0.00 BMWLT 2025-2 A3 3.97
09/25/2028 4.32% 4,697.83 0.00 4,697.83 0.00
Coupon 08/27/2026 74153WCU1 0.00

PRICOA GLOBAL
FUNDING I 4.4
08/27/2027

4.41% 66,000.00 0.00 66,000.00 0.00
Coupon 08/31/2026 91282CHX2 0.00

UNITED STATES
TREASURY 4.375
08/31/2028

4.35% 43,750.00 0.00 43,750.00 0.00
Coupon 08/31/2026 91282CEB3 0.00

UNITED STATES
TREASURY 1.875
02/28/2029

4.30% 28,125.00 0.00 28,125.00 0.00
Coupon 08/31/2026 91282CQD6 0.00

UNITED STATES
TREASURY 3.5
02/28/2031

3.72% 100,625.00 0.00 100,625.00 0.00
Coupon 08/31/2026 91282CNX5 0.00

UNITED STATES
TREASURY 3.625
08/31/2030

3.66% 90,625.00 0.00 90,625.00 0.00
Coupon 08/31/2026 91282CLK5 0.00

UNITED STATES
TREASURY 3.625
08/31/2029

3.53% 97,875.00 0.00 97,875.00 0.00
Coupon 08/31/2026 91282CCW9 0.00

UNITED STATES
TREASURY 0.75
08/31/2026

1.00% 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 0.00
Total Coupon 0.00 948,948.83 0.00 948,948.83 0.00
Custody Fee 08/25/2026 CCYUSD (1,798.40) Cash 0.00% (1,798.40) 0.00 (1,798.40) 0.00 Total Custody Fee (1,798.40) (1,798.40) 0.00 (1,798.40) 0.00 Dividend 08/31/2026 31846V807 0.00 FIRST AMER:TRS OBG Y 3.29% 7,126.35 0.00 7,126.35 0.00 Total Dividend 0.00 7,126.35 0.00 7,126.35 0.00
Management Fee 08/18/2026 CCYUSD (10,869.41) Cash 0.00% (10,869.41) 0.00 (10,869.41) 0.00 Total
Management Fee (10,869.41) (10,869.41) 0.00 (10,869.41) 0.00 Principal Paydown 08/01/2026 3137FMCR1 2,829.33 FHMS K-093 A2 2.982 05/25/2029 3.82% 2,829.33 -- 2,829.33 0.01
City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

TRANSACTION LEDGER
Transaction Type Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/
Disp
Yield
Amount Interest Pur/
Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
Total Principal
Paydown 2,829.33 2,829.33 -- 2,829.33 0.01

TOTAL OTHER
TRANSACTIONS (9,838.48) 946,236.70 0.00 946,236.70 0.01 City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
Chandler Asset Management, Inc. (“Chandler”) is an SEC registered investment adviser. For additional information about our firm, please see our current disclosures (Form ADV).

To obtain a copy of our current disclosures, you may contact your client service representative by calling the number on the front of this statement or you may visit our website at www.chandlerasset.com.

Information contained in this monthly statement is confidential and is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as specific investment or legal advice. The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of this statement, but may become outdated or superseded at any time without notice.

Custody: Your qualified custodian bank maintains control of all assets reflected in this statement and we urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Chandler does not have any authority to withdraw or deposit funds from/to the custodian account.

Valuation: Prices are provided by IDC, an independent pricing source. In the event IDC does not provide a price or if the price provided is not reflective of fair market value, Chandler will obtain pricing from an alternative approved third party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures. Our valuation procedures are also disclosed in Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A.

Performance: Performance results are presented gross-of-advisory fees and represent the client’s Total Return. The deduction of advisory fees lowers performance results. These results include the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, clients should not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Economic factors, market conditions or changes in investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of your portfolio.

Source ICE Data Indices, LLC (“ICE”), used with permission. ICE PERMITS USE OF THE ICE INDICES AND RELATED DATA ON AN “AS IS” BASIS; ICE, ITS AFFILIATES AND

THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS, EXPRESS AND/OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, INCLUDING THE INDICES, INDEX DATA AND ANY DATA INCLUDED IN, RELATED TO, OR DERIVED THEREFROM.

NEITHER ICE DATA, ITS AFFILIATES OR THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS GUARANTEE THE QUALITY, ADEQUACY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INDICES OR THE INDEX DATA OR ANY COMPONENT THEREOF, AND THE INDICES AND INDEX DATA AND ALL COMPONENTS THEREOF ARE PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS AND LICENSEE’S USE IS AT LICENSEE’S OWN RISK. ICE DATA, ITS AFFILIATES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY DO NOT SPONSOR, ENDORSE, OR RECOMMEND CHANDLER, OR ANY OF ITS PRODUCTS OR SERVICES.

Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions. Historical performance results for investment indexes generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Ratings: Ratings information have been provided by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch through data feeds we believe to be reliable as of the date of this statement, however we cannot guarantee its accuracy.

Security level ratings for U.S. Agency issued mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) reflect the issuer rating because the securities themselves are not rated. The issuing U.S. Agency guarantees the full and timely payment of both principal and interest.

LGIP Yields: Reported yields for local government investment pools may be presented as either the 30-day yield or the monthly distribution yield, as applicable. For certain funds, the 30-day yield is calculated using reported daily yield data. Yield calculations are subject to change and may not be directly comparable across funds.

LAIF Yields: Additional Disclosure for CA Clients - As a result of a reporting lag from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), reported LAIF yields represent the most recently available Daily Effective Yield and may reflect data from approximately 7–10 days prior to month-end.

City of Santa Barbara Managed | Account #11204 | As of August 31, 2026 Execution Time: 09/03/2026 01:45:12 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

BENCHMARK INDEX & DISCLOSURES
Benchmark Disclosure
ICE BofA 1-5 Yr US Treasury & Agency
Index
The ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Treasury & Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market. Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch). Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than five years remaining term to final maturity, at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule, and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies.

ENDING BALANCE AS OF August 31, 2026
Book
Description Value
River City Bank Lockbox Account $ 1,820,393
River City Bank ICS (Investment Account) 19,052,365
Total Cash and Investments $ 20,872,758
August 31, 2026
ATTACHMENT 2

COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION (CCA)

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Summary of Cash and Investments
8/1/2026 to 8/31/2026

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
PARS Post-Employment Benefits Trust
Account Summary
Source 8/1/2026 Contributions Earnings Expenses Distributions Transfers 8/31/2026 PENSION 1002 $2,872,777.50 $0.00 $35,606.74 $1,420.02 $0.00 $0.00 $2,906,964.22 Totals $2,872,777.50 $0.00 $35,606.74 $1,420.02 $0.00 $0.00 $2,906,964.22 Investment Selection
Source

PENSION
Investment Objective
Source

PENSION
Investment Return
Source 1-Month 3-Months 1-Year 3-Years 5-Years 10-Years PENSION 1.24% 0.61% 11.34% - - - 1/26/2024
Information as provided by US Bank, Trustee for PARS; Not FDIC Insured; No Bank Guarantee; May Lose Value Headquarters - 4350 Von Karman Ave., Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA 92660 800.540.6369 Fax 949.250.1250 www.pars.org Balance as of
The dual goals of the Moderate Strategy are growth of principal and income. It is expected that dividend and interest income will comprise a significant portion of total return, although growth through capital appreciation is equally important. The portfolio will be allocated between equity and fixed income investments.

Plan's Inception Date
Account balances are inclusive of Trust Administration, Trustee and Investment Management fees Annualized Return
Investment Return: Annualized rate of return is the return on an investment over a period other than one year multiplied or divided to give a comparable one-year return.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Performance returns may not reflect the deduction of applicable fees, which could reduce returns. Information is deemed reliable but may be subject to change.

Account Report for the Period
Balance as of
Moderate - Strategic Blend
ATTACHMENT 3

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Council Agenda Report
Agenda Date: September 29, 2026
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Finance Department
Subject: Fiscal Year 2027 Interim Financial Statements for the First Month Ended July 31, 2026
Recommendation:

That Council accept the Fiscal Year 2027 Interim Financial Statements for the First month ended July 31, 2026.

Discussion
The interim financial statements for the first month ended July 31, 2026 (8.3% of the fiscal year) are attached. The interim financial statements include budgetary activity in comparison to actual activity for the General Fund, Enterprise Funds, Internal Service Funds, and select Special Revenue Funds.

Attachment:

1. Interim Financial Statements for the First Month Ended July 31, 2026.

Prepared by: Nathalie Lecolley, Controller
Submitted by: Keith DeMartini, Finance Director
Approved by: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
Agenda Item No. 6
# ATTACHMENT 1
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with %of Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
GENERAL FUND (pages 3-7)
Revenue 222,327,890 222,327,890 9,392,828 - 212,935,063 4.2% 12,390,459 Expenditures 221,942,974 224,362,829 9,609,074 6,538,903 208,214,851 7.2% 23,332,294 Addition to / (use of) reserves (2,034,939) 384,916 (216,247) (6,538,903) 4,720,211 (10,941,835)

MEASURE C
Included in GF summary
Revenue 34,800,000 34,800,000 2,833,966 - 31,966,034 8.1% 2,761,883 Expenditures 33,901,429 82,365,234 220,141 18,166,993 63,978,101 22.3% 478,007 Addition to / (use of) reserves (47,565,234) 898,571 2,613,825 (18,166,993) (32,012,066) 2,283,875 SOLID WASTE FUND (page 9)
Revenue 47,209,731 47,209,731 3,620,903 - 43,588,829 7.7% 3,667,416 Expenditures 47,196,177 47,609,064 1,529,595 724,107 45,355,362 4.7% 1,523,281 Addition to / (use of) reserves (399,333) 13,554 2,091,307 (724,107) (1,766,533) 2,144,135 WATER OPERATING FUND (page 10)
Revenue 91,119,446 91,119,446 8,118,600 - 83,000,846 8.9% 6,775,236 Expenditures 93,452,729 97,219,114 4,244,363 6,172,891 86,801,860 10.7% 4,770,987 Addition to / (use of) reserves (6,099,668) (2,333,283) 3,874,238 (6,172,891) (3,801,014) 2,004,249 WASTEWATER OPERATING FUND (page 11)
Revenue 37,612,366 37,612,366 2,921,406 - 34,690,960 7.8% 2,780,543 Expenditures 39,309,989 40,649,683 2,060,520 3,706,963 34,882,200 14.2% 2,546,821 Addition to / (use of) reserves (3,037,317) (1,697,623) 860,885 (3,706,963) (191,240) 233,722 DOWNTOWN PARKING FUND (page 12)
Revenue 11,041,562 11,041,562 943,217 - 10,098,345 8.5% 945,517 Expenditures 10,932,642 11,015,215 511,243 509,774 9,994,198 9.3% 723,140 Addition to / (use of) reserves 26,347 108,920 431,974 (509,774) 104,147 222,377 AIRPORT OPERATING FUND (page 13)
Revenue 44,421,154 44,421,154 2,088,086 - 42,333,068 4.7% 2,145,716 Expenditures 41,953,038 46,838,087 2,200,154 5,430,858 39,207,074 16.3% 2,694,449 Addition to / (use of) reserves (2,416,933) 2,468,116 (112,068) (5,430,858) 3,125,993 (548,733) GOLF COURSE FUND (page 14)
Revenue 5,529,543 5,529,543 497,103 - 5,032,440 9.0% 543,248 Expenditures 6,529,768 6,529,868 294,867 - 6,235,000 4.5% 268,925 Addition to / (use of) reserves (1,000,325) (1,000,225) 202,236 - (1,202,560) 274,323 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FUND (page 15)
Revenue 8,370,862 8,370,862 681,964 - 7,688,898 8.1% 678,737 Expenditures 8,315,312 8,591,699 288,374 1,552,343 6,750,982 21.4% 462,833 Addition to / (use of) reserves (220,836) 55,551 393,591 (1,552,343) 937,917 215,905

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
Summary by Fund
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

Page 1 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with %of Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
Summary by Fund
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year) FLEET REPLACEMENT FUND (page 16)
Revenue 7,977,751 7,977,751 635,093 - 7,342,658 8.0% 562,344 Expenditures 10,238,304 19,671,660 17,144 2,417,793 17,236,723 12.4% 23,013 Addition to / (use of) reserves (11,693,909) (2,260,553) 617,949 (2,417,793) (9,894,065) 539,330 FLEET MAINTENANCE FUND (page 17)
Revenue 4,096,793 4,096,793 344,135 - 3,752,658 8.4% 343,246 Expenditures 4,167,887 4,168,593 231,141 489,338 3,448,114 17.3% 264,486 Addition to / (use of) reserves (71,800) (71,094) 112,994 (489,338) 304,544 78,760 SELF INSURANCE TRUST FUND (page 18)
Revenue 28,836,346 28,836,346 2,138,583 - 26,697,763 7.4% 2,085,349 Expenditures 27,811,340 28,459,471 1,005,833 1,081,252 26,372,385 7.3% 1,042,527 Addition to / (use of) reserves 376,875 1,025,006 1,132,750 (1,081,252) 325,377 1,042,823 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND (page 19)
Revenue 10,820,522 10,820,522 867,560 - 9,952,962 8.0% 861,080 Expenditures 11,020,545 11,025,530 1,234,939 402,647 9,387,944 14.9% 1,392,991 Addition to / (use of) reserves (205,007) (200,023) (367,379) (402,647) 565,018 (531,911) WATERFRONT OPERATING FUND (page 20)
Revenue 21,568,147 21,568,147 2,015,719 - 19,552,428 9.3% 1,591,504 Expenditures 23,279,304 23,484,268 1,865,452 711,921 20,906,896 11.0% 2,322,220 Addition to / (use of) reserves (1,916,121) (1,711,157) 150,267 (711,921) (1,354,468) (730,716) SANTA BARBARA CLEAN ENERGY FUND (page 21)
Revenue 38,685,711 38,685,711 7,792 - 38,677,919 0.0% 60,188 Expenditures 40,866,452 45,356,388 354,883 4,186,305 40,815,199 10.0% 4,893,243 Addition to / (use of) reserves (6,670,677) (2,180,741) (347,091) (4,186,305) (2,137,280) (4,833,055) ENERGY AND CLIMATE MANAGEMENT FUND (page 22)
Revenue 2,286,149 2,286,149 185,086 - 2,101,063 8.1% 188,770 Expenditures 2,368,296 2,636,847 39,473 89,682 2,507,691 4.9% 19,382 Addition to / (use of) reserves (350,697) (82,147) 145,613 (89,682) (406,628) 169,388

TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS

INCLUDE MEASURE C
Revenue 616,703,974 616,703,974 37,292,041 - 579,411,933 6.0% 38,381,236 Expenditures 623,286,188 699,983,549 25,707,196 52,181,772 622,094,582 11.1% 46,758,599 Addition to / (use of) reserves (83,279,575) (6,582,213) 11,584,845 (52,181,772) (42,682,648) (8,377,363) ** It is City policy to adopt a balanced budget. In most cases, encumbrance balances exist at year-end. These encumbrance balances are obligations of each fund and must be reported at the beginning of each fiscal year. In addition, a corresponding appropriations entry must be made in order to accommodate the 'carried-over' encumbrance amount. Most differences between budgeted annual revenues and expenses are due to these encumbrance carryovers.

Page 2 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Balance with Percent Previous Change Over Budget Budget Actual Revised budget Received YTD Prior Year TAXES
Sales and Use 32,500,000 32,500,000 2,605,924 29,894,076 8.0% 2,677,596 -2.7% Measure I Sales Tax 16,400,000 16,400,000 1,357,399 15,042,601 8.3% - 0.0% Property Taxes 56,500,000 56,500,000 - 56,500,000 0.0% - 0.0% Utility Users Tax 10,540,000 10,540,000 183,451 10,356,549 1.7% 789,508 -76.8% Transient Occupancy Tax 31,000,000 31,000,000 40,308 30,959,692 0.1% 2,825,912 -98.6% Business License 3,065,476 3,065,476 44,933 3,020,543 1.5% 33,691 33.4% Cannabis Excise Tax 1,200,000 1,200,000 (46,995) 1,246,995 -3.9% 80,781 -158.2% Real Property Transfer Tax 1,100,000 1,100,000 83,408 1,016,592 7.6% 59,118 41.1% Total Tax Revenues 152,305,476 152,305,476 4,268,428 148,037,048 2.8% 6,466,605 -34.0%

LICENSES & PERMITS
Licenses & Permits 237,831 237,831 2,909 234,922 1.2% 18,460 -84.2% Total 237,831 237,831 2,909 234,922 1.2% 18,460 -84.2%

FINES & FORFEITURES
Police 3,755,452 3,755,452 15,452 3,740,000 0.4% 310,153 -95.0% Other Fines & Forfeitures 525,800 525,800 70,623 455,177 13.4% 40,562 74.1% Total 4,281,252 4,281,252 86,075 4,195,177 2.0% 350,714 -75.5%

USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
Investment Income 2,497,391 2,497,391 207,203 2,290,188 8.3% 333,944 -38.0% Rents & Concessions 1,673,573 1,673,573 91,903 1,581,670 5.5% 109,517 -16.1% Total 4,170,964 4,170,964 299,106 3,871,858 7.2% 443,462 -32.6%

INTERGOVERNMENTAL
Library 888,719 888,719 - 888,719 0.0% - 0.0%
Fire 1,500,000 1,500,000 24,422 1,475,578 1.6% - 0.0%
Other Intergovernmental 501,078 501,078 1,152 499,926 0.2% 1,100 4.7% Total 2,889,796 2,889,796 25,574 2,864,222 0.9% 1,100 2224.5%

FEES & SERVICE CHARGES
Community Development 8,425,457 8,425,457 727,035 7,698,422 8.6% 1,034,032 -29.7% Parks & Recreation 4,779,585 4,779,585 984,462 3,795,122 20.6% 1,043,536 -5.7% Other Service Charges 2,894,456 2,894,456 239,537 2,654,919 8.3% 251,231 -4.7% Total 16,099,497 16,099,497 1,951,033 14,148,464 12.1% 2,328,798 -16.2%

OTHER REVENUES
Interfund Charges & Reimbursement 19,904,715 19,904,715 1,291,147 18,613,568 6.5% 1,341,444 -3.7% Inner - City Contracted Servs. 324,000 324,000 4,792 319,208 1.5% - 0.0% Overhead Indirect Allocations 12,921,424 12,921,424 1,073,436 11,847,988 8.3% 1,076,098 -0.2% Interfund Transfers 1,306,935 1,306,935 48,325 1,258,610 3.7% 64,951 -25.6% Interfund Loans 24,140 24,140 - 24,140 0.0% - 0.0%
Miscellaneous 1,334,360 1,334,360 15,267 1,319,093 1.1% 2,005 661.6% Donations 77,500 77,500 - 77,500 0.0% - 0.0%
Franchise Fees 6,450,000 6,450,000 326,734 6,123,266 5.1% 296,821 10.1% Total 42,343,074 42,343,074 2,759,702 39,583,372 6.5% 2,781,319 -0.8% Subtotal Non-Tax Revenues 70,022,414 70,022,414 5,124,400 64,898,015 7.3% 5,923,854 -13.5% TOTAL REVENUES 222,327,890 222,327,890 9,392,828 212,935,063 4.2% 12,390,459 -24.2%

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
General Fund
Interim Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

Page 3 ends

YTD
Remaining Expended
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with and Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Encumbered YTD

GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Mayor & City Council
MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL 1,395,250 1,394,884 66,747 1,328,503 - 4.8% 94,190 ARTS & COMMUNITY PROMOTIONS 2,007,402 2,007,402 70,611 1,607,867 328,924 19.9% 237,500 Total 3,402,652 3,402,286 137,358 2,936,370 328,924 13.7% 331,690 City Attorney
CITY ATTORNEY-ADMINISTRATION 6,674,942 6,385,971 238,138 5,837,601 599,204 12.5% 213,372 CITY ATTORNEY-ADVISORY - - 10.70 (11) - 0.0% 80,916
Total 6,674,942 6,385,971 238,138 5,837,601 599,204 12.5% 439,360 Administration
CITY ADMINISTRATOR 3,078,311 2,976,097 100,511 2,776,857 200,943 9.8% 224,667 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS - - 6.89 (7) - 0.0% -
CITY TV 725,807 725,170 20,057 682,113 23,636 6.0% 38,779 DOWNTOWN PROGRAM 2,367,021 2,248,739 33,610 1,386,078 947,333 41.4% 73,575 HUMAN SVCS. 1,403,788 1,338,156 4,169 1,333,980 65,639 5.0% 3,001,026 HOUSING MEDIATION 634,460 634,460 23,104 611,251 104 3.7% 9,811 COMMUNITY VITALITY 892,830 892,830 25,839 866,852 139 2.9% 10,622 CITY CLERK 1,388,452 1,379,641 54,849 1,324,792 8,811 4.6% 69,796 Total 10,490,667 10,195,092 262,145 1,246,606 8,981,916 14.4% 3,428,278 Human Resources
HUMAN RESOURCES 3,111,166 3,079,704 109,764 2,921,748 79,654 6.1% 144,919 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 72,924 - 4,920 (4,920) 72,924 106.7% 25,007 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT 83,697 79,447 - 4,250 79,447 5.1% - Total 3,267,787 3,159,151 114,684 156,828 2,996,274 8.3% 169,926 Finance
ADMINISTRATION 314,542 234,723 (39,756) 274,479 79,819 12.7% 8,540 REVENUE & CASH MANAGEMENT 1,088,745 929,796 31,666 898,130 158,949 17.5% 58,110 CASHIERING & COLLECTION 1,873,793 1,684,436 54,091 1,270,346 549,357 32.2% 97,346 BUDGET MANAGEMENT 1,180,086 1,173,086 32,904 1,140,183 7,000 3.4% 62,103 ACCOUNTING 1,287,908 1,274,338 42,640 1,231,698 13,570 4.4% 76,137 MISCELLANEOUS 665,783 665,783 21,361 644,422 - 3.2% 39,561 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 290,794 290,794 13,755 277,039 - 4.7% 22,776 CITY BILLING & CUSTOMER SERVICE 1,111,590 1,076,797 29,482 1,047,315 34,793 5.8% 21,572 PURCHASING 911,390 911,390 40,750 870,640 - 4.5% 66,441 CENTRAL WAREHOUSE 130,931 130,931 5,085 125,847 - 3.9% 17,215 MAIL SERVICES 97,844 96,713 3,398 93,078 1,368 4.9% 15,381 Total 8,953,406 8,468,788 235,376 844,855 7,873,175 12.1% 485,183 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 32,789,454 31,611,289 987,701 3,176,417 28,625,336 12.7% 4,854,437 General Fund
Interim Statement of Appropriations, Expenditures and Encumbrances For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

Page 4 ends

YTD
Remaining Expended
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with and Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Encumbered YTD General Fund
Interim Statement of Appropriations, Expenditures and Encumbrances For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

PUBLIC SAFETY
Police
CHIEF'S STAFF 2,486,971 2,450,901 239,745 2,211,156 36,070 11.1% 301,185 BUSINESS OFFICE 1,261,827 1,261,827 39,183 1,217,823 4,820 3.5% 79,870 RECORDS BUREAU 2,601,334 2,601,193 96,591 2,504,743 - 3.7% 162,592 STRATEGIC OPERATIONS 2,676,304 2,670,661 125,469 2,542,191 8,643 5.0% 179,210 PROPERTY ROOM 347,341 347,341 9,531 337,810 - 2.7% 23,502 TRAINING, RECRUITMENT/WELLNESS 3,290,426 3,191,381 160,094 2,975,928 154,405 9.6% 234,668 RANGE AND EQUIPMENT 2,189,117 2,160,698 163,683 1,952,015 73,419 10.8% 157,437 INF.TECHNOLOGY/CRIME ANALYSIS 2,484,593 2,476,258 117,741 1,960,346 406,505 21.1% 469,818 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS & INTERNAL OP 8,389,535 8,369,612 346,690 8,022,922 19,923 4.4% 540,969 CRIME LAB 213,418 213,418 7,571 205,847 - 3.5% 14,522
FIELD OPERATIONS DIVISION 27,674,254 27,573,311 1,294,923 26,278,388 100,943 5.0% 1,887,969 TRAFFIC 1,866,857 1,866,857 71,001 1,795,855 - 3.8% 139,562 SPECIAL EVENTS 550,107 550,107 5,979 529,393 14,735 3.8% 21,303 STREET CRIMES UNIT 3,191,588 3,191,588 132,634 3,058,954 - 4.2% 207,085 SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT TEAM 108,194 108,194 - 108,194 - 0.0% - PARKING AND STREET SWEEPING 320,280 320,280 16,087 304,193 - 5.0% 24,828 PARKING ENFORCEMENT 1,704,820 1,704,820 64,047 1,640,772 - 3.8% 82,580 COMBINED COMMUNICATIONS CTR. 3,991,448 3,991,448 159,362 3,832,086 - 4.0% 290,264 ANIMAL CONTROL 1,395,756 1,231,088 18,937 1,212,151 164,668 13.2% 34,567 Total 66,744,170 66,280,982 3,069,271 984,131 62,690,767 6.1% 4,851,929 Fire
ADMINISTRATION 1,368,935 1,368,935 140,687 1,228,248 - 10.3% 182,795 EMERGENCY SRVS / PUBLIC ED 578,267 528,467 21,082 507,385 49,800 12.3% 42,262 PREVENTION 1,999,967 1,999,967 79,777 1,920,190 - 4.0% 108,272 WILDLAND FIRE MITIGATION PROG. 550,431 549,146 16,589 532,557 1,285 3.2% 26,916 OPERATIONS 37,769,310 37,696,583 1,583,345 36,098,921 87,044 4.4% 2,378,126 TRAINING AND RECRUITMENT 1,165,202 1,165,202 39,748 1,115,610 9,844 4.3% 67,849 ARFF 4,183,599 4,183,599 236,427 3,947,172 - 5.7% 346,175 Total 47,615,711 47,491,899 2,117,655 147,972 45,350,084 4.8% 3,152,395 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 114,359,881 113,772,881 5,186,926 1,132,104 108,040,851 5.5% 8,004,324

PUBLIC WORKS
Public Works
ADMINISTRATION 2,083,585 2,103,593 88,376 1,993,708 21,508 5.2% 112,522 ENGINEERING SVCS 12,779,288 12,779,288 389,878 12,376,177 13,232 3.2% 786,422 PUBLIC RT OF WAY MGMT 2,284,207 2,290,996 90,098 2,193,810 7,088 4.2% 178,393 Total 17,173,876 17,147,080 568,352 41,829 16,563,696 3.6% 1,077,337 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 17,173,876 17,147,080 568,352 41,829 16,563,696 3.6% 1,077,337

Page 5 ends

YTD
Remaining Expended
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with and Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Encumbered YTD General Fund
Interim Statement of Appropriations, Expenditures and Encumbrances For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

COMMUNITY SERVICES
Parks & Recreation
REC PROGRAM MGMT 811,604 811,604 55,239 740,999 15,366 8.7% 91,272 FACILITIES & SPECIAL EVENTS 2,750,934 2,750,934 119,053 2,473,381 158,500 10.1% 163,993 YOUTH ACTIVITIES 1,800,515 1,800,515 118,044 1,675,659 6,812 6.9% 207,672 ACTIVE ADULTS 1,200,340 1,200,340 88,005 1,105,571 6,764 7.9% 102,145 AQUATICS 2,455,550 2,451,886 196,829 2,118,756 139,965 13.7% 480,341 SPORTS 1,613,108 1,559,997 143,743 1,179,239 290,127 26.9% 154,553 NEIGHBORHOOD/OUTREACH SERV 1,689,109 1,689,109 86,935 1,581,274 20,900 6.4% 118,324 ADMINISTRATION 1,888,011 1,888,011 92,312 1,794,358 1,342 5.0% 133,721 PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM 1,229,187 1,221,030 47,958 1,172,341 8,888 4.6% 81,837 PARK OPERATIONS MNGMNT 1,564,032 1,564,032 66,902 1,494,599 2,530 4.4% 104,360 GROUNDS & FACILITIES MAINT. 8,586,449 8,578,360 335,884 7,913,221 337,344 7.8% 492,851 FORESTRY 2,366,180 2,366,180 90,090 2,276,090 - 3.8% 135,670 BEACH MAINTENANCE 330,180 326,571 18,729 292,356 19,095 11.5% 27,074 MEDIANS PARKWAYS&CONTRACTS 647,909 638,509 10,208 344,339 293,362 46.9% 17,781 Total 28,933,107 28,847,078 1,469,929 1,300,994 26,162,184 9.6% 2,312,301 Library
ADMINISTRATION 1,855,200 1,855,200 64,489 1,790,711 - 3.5% 66,078 CENTRAL LIBRARY 6,561,213 6,561,213 283,245 6,045,022 232,946 7.9% 479,170 EASTSIDE LIBRARY 1, 1,207,587 207,587 29,587 1,175,501 2,498 2.7% 46,158 LIBRARY ON THE GO 909,276 909,276 22,597 886,679 - 2.5% 31,526 Total 10,533,275 10,533,275 399,917 235,445 9,897,914 6.0% 644,157 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 39,466,382 39,380,353 1,869,846 1,536,439 36,060,097 8.6% 2,956,458

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Community Development
ADMINISTRATION 1,183,270 1,183,270 71,558 - 1,111,712 6.0% 135,165 LONG RANGE PLAN & SPEC STUDY 1,533,685 1,517,237 49,535 16,678 1,467,472 4.3% 81,473 DEVEL & ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 2,292,009 2,175,956 81,765 116,896 2,093,348 8.7% 149,890 ZONING INFO & ENFORCEMENT 1,936,481 1,935,377 67,108 1,838 1,867,535 3.6% 133,115 DESIGN REV & HIST PRESERVATION 2,008,587 2,008,587 65,400 788 1,942,398 3.3% 137,414 BLDG INSP & CODE ENFORCEMENT 2,257,541 2,257,541 264,218 761 1,992,562 11.7% 165,219 RECORDS ARCHIVES & CLER SVCS 808,484 808,484 34,893 28,600 744,991 7.9% 56,834 BLDG COUNTER & PLAN REV SVCS 4,089,182 3,670,444 132,012 419,667 3,537,504 13.5% 219,663 CODE COMPLIANCE 1,204,027 1,204,027 45,621 471 1,157,935 3.8% 91,378 Total 17,313,266 16,760,923 812,111 585,698 15,915,457 8.1% 1,196,551 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 17,313,266 16,760,923 812,111 585,698 15,915,457 8.1% 1,196,551

Page 6 ends

YTD
Remaining Expended
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with and Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Encumbered YTD General Fund
Interim Statement of Appropriations, Expenditures and Encumbrances For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE
Sustainability and Resilience
ABATEMENT 153,592 128,072 2,196 66,417 84,979 44.7% 1,221 Total 153,592 128,072 2,196 66,417 84,979 44.7% 1,221
TOTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE 153,592 128,072 2,196 66,417 84,979 44.7% 1,221

NON-DEPARTMENTAL
Non-Departmental
DUES, MEMBERSHIPS, & LICENSES 124,500 124,500 - - 124,500 0.0% - OTHER 76,366 76,366 17,619 - 58,747 23.1% -
TRANSFERS OUT 3,159,164 3,159,164 115,237 - 3,043,927 3.6% 2,168,765 CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFER - - 49,086 - (49,086) 0.0% 73,200 ICS REBATES (2, (2,217,653) 217,653) - - (2,217,653) 0.0% - APPROP. RESERVE 464,000 500,000 - - 464,000 0.0% -
MEASURE I TRANSFER 3, 3,000,000 000,000 - - 3,000,000 0.0% 3,000,000 Sub Total 4,606,377 4,642,377 181,942 - 4,424,435 3.9% 5,241,965 ANTICIPATED SALARY SAVINGS (1,500,000) (1,500,000) - (1,500,000) - 0.0% - TOTAL NON-DEPARTMENTAL 3,106,377 3,142,377 181,942 - 2,924,435 5.9% 5,241,965 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 224,362,829 221,942,974 9,609,074 6,538,903 208,214,851 7.2% 23,332,294 ** The legal level of budgetary control is at the department level for the General Fund. Therefore, as long as the department as a whole is within budget, budgetary compliance has been achieved. The City actively monitors the budget status of each department and takes measures to address potential over budget situations before they occur.

For Enterprise and Internal Service Funds, the level of budgetary control is at the fund level. The City also monitors and addresses these fund types for potential over budget situations.

Page 7 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
Revenue 245,000 245,000 31,658 - 213,342 12.9% 23,727
Expenditures 245,000 245,000 31,658 - 213,342 12.9% 23,727 Revenue Less Expenditures - - - - - -

CREEK RESTORATION/WATER QUALITY IMPRVMT
Revenue 7,183,381 7,183,381 88,347 - 7,095,034 1.2% 669,585 Expenditures 9,403,034 9,630,703 340,788 1,577,959 7,711,957 19.9% 389,873 Revenue Less Expenditures (2,447,323) (2,219,654) (252,441) (1,577,959) (616,923) 279,711

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
Revenue 1,146,418 1,146,418 23,522 - 1,122,896 2.1% 14,334 Expenditures 1,079,305 1,686,446 4,200 397,012 1,285,235 23.8% 13,328 Revenue Less Expenditures (540,028) 67,113 19,322 (397,012) (162,339) 1,006

COUNTY LIBRARY
Revenue 501,073 501,073 117 - 500,956 0.0% 480
Expenditures 500,753 500,767 12,988 3,305 484,474 3.3% 23,984 Revenue Less Expenditures 306 320 (12,870) (3,305) 16,481 (23,505)

STREETS FUND
Revenue 15,278,432 15,278,432 481,766 - 14,796,666 3.2% 1,008,223 Expenditures 16,356,103 16,530,767 957,806 442,486 15,130,474 8.5% 1,079,819 Revenue Less Expenditures (1,252,335) (1,077,671) (476,041) (442,486) (333,808) (71,596)

MEASURE A FUND
Revenue 4,873,589 4,873,589 423,794 - 4,449,795 8.7% 8,594 Expenditures 4,777,950 5,069,084 228,161 540,552 4,300,371 15.2% 349,152 Revenue Less Expenditures (195,495) 95,639 195,633 (540,552) 149,424 (340,558)

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
Special Revenue Funds
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

Page 8 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Service charges 46,671,076 46,671,076 3,589,286 - 43,081,789 7.7% 3,615,938 Other Fees & Charges 30,000 30,000 3,255 - 26,745 10.9% 4,534 Investment Income 443,600 443,600 23,338 - 420,262 5.3% 41,921 Rents & Concessions 15,067 15,067 5,023 - 10,043 33.3% 5,023 Grants 21,651 21,651 - - 21,651 0.0% -
Miscellaneous 28,338 28,338 - - 28,338 0.0% -
TOTAL REVENUES 47,209,731 47,209,731 3,620,903 - 43,588,829 7.7% 3,667,416

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 2,675,132 2,675,132 86,381 - 2,588,751 3.2% 158,795 Materials, Supplies & Services 43,214,945 43,418,522 1,406,811 687,324 41,324,387 4.8% 1,344,385 Special Projects 840,100 979,410 19,736 - 959,674 2.0% 2,914 Transfers-Out 200,000 200,000 16,667 - 183,333 8.3% 16,667 Equipment 226,000 296,000 - 36,783 259,217 12.4% 519
Other 40,000 40,000 - - 40,000 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 47,609,064 47,196,177 1,529,595 724,107 45,355,362 4.7% 1,523,281 Revenue Less Expense (399,333) 13,554 2,091,307 (724,107) (1,766,533) 2,144,135

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

SOLID WASTE FUND

Page 9 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Water Sales- Metered 76,980,000 76,980,000 6,524,015 - 70,455,985 8.5% 6,159,754 Service Charges 278,000 278,000 49,398 - 228,602 17.8% 35,126 Cater JPA Treatment 2,500,000 2,500,000 1,044,781 - 1,455,219 41.8% - Investment Income 4,660,100 4,660,100 306,883 - 4,353,217 6.6% 543,515 Reimbursements 6,591,346 6,591,346 184,835 - 6,406,511 2.8% 36,591 Miscellaneous 110,000 110,000 8,688 - 101,312 7.9% 250
TOTAL REVENUES 91,119,446 91,119,446 8,118,600 - 83,000,846 8.9% 6,775,236

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 20,322,169 20,322,169 670,220 - 19,651,950 3.3% 1,247,649 Materials, Supplies 36,088,783 38,951,339 893,621 5,880,055 32,177,662 17.4% 892,712 Special Projects 687,015 1,273,740 (1,384) 65,392 1,209,732 5.0% 6,847 Water Purchases - - 488,872 - (488,872) 0.0% 362,246
Debt Service 7,718,773 7,718,773 - - 7,718,773 0.0% -
Transfer-Out - - 5,055 - (5,055) 0.0% 4,268
Capital Outlay Transfers 27,678,790 27,678,790 2,187,250 - 25,491,540 7.9% 2,187,250 Equipment 350,399 371,686 - 46,287 325,399 12.5% 65
Capitalized Fixed Assets 709,317 415,000 - 179,657 529,660 25.3% 69,949 Other 41,800 43,300 729 1,500 41,071 5.1% -
Appropriated Reserve 150,000 150,000 - - 150,000 0.0% - TOTAL EXPENSES 97,219,114 93,452,729 4,244,363 6,172,891 86,801,860 10.7% 4,770,987 Revenue Less Expense (6,099,668) (2,333,283) 3,874,238 (6,172,891) (3,801,014) 2,004,249

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

WATER OPERATING FUND

Page 10 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with % of Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Service Charges 36,189,366 36,189,366 2,865,716 - 33,323,650 7.9% 2,640,888 Fees 640,000 640,000 20,678 - 619,322 3.2% 45,889
Investment Income 737,000 737,000 30,387 - 706,613 4.1% 80,561 Rents & Concessions 41,000 41,000 4,624 - 36,376 11.3% 4,505 Miscellaneous 5,000 5,000 - - 5,000 0.0% 8,700
TOTAL REVENUES 37,612,366 37,612,366 2,921,406 - 34,690,960 7.8% 2,780,543

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 12,633,099 12,633,099 448,644 - 12,184,456 3.6% 862,886 Materials, Supplies&Servs. 15,862,074 15,108,071 663,170 3,532,995 11,665,909 26.5% 736,015 Special Projects 187,600 752,566 (909) 153,467 600,008 20.3% (909) Transfer-Out - - 5,055 - (5,055) 0.0% 4,268
Debt Service 4,121,283 4,121,283 341,981 - 3,779,302 8.3% 341,981 Capital Outlay Transfers 7,003,736 7,003,736 602,580 - 6,401,156 8.6% 602,580 Equipment 113,400 129,900 - 16,500 113,400 12.7% -
Capitalized Fixed Assets 140,000 140,224 - - 140,224 0.0% - Other 2,800 6,800 - 4,000 2,800 58.8% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 40,649,683 39,309,989 2,060,520 3,706,963 34,882,200 14.2% 2,546,821 Revenue Less Expense (3,037,317) (1,697,623) 860,885 (3,706,963) (191,240) 233,722 Miscellaneous

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

WASTEWATER OPERATING FUND

Page 11 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with % of Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Improvement Tax 1,000,000 1,000,000 33,277 - 966,723 3.3% 117,380 Parking Fees 9,403,546 9,403,546 655,287 - 8,748,259 7.0% 765,010 Other Fees & Charges 2,000 2,000 - - 2,000 0.0% 53
Investment Income 145,000 145,000 12,394 - 132,606 8.5% 17,799 Rents & Concessions 206,057 206,057 26,457 - 179,600 12.8% 31,506 Miscellaneous 151,341 151,341 204,668 - (53,327) 135.2% 2,633 Operating Transfers-In 133,618 133,618 11,135 - 122,483 8.3% 11,135 TOTAL REVENUES 11,041,562 11,041,562 943,217 - 10,098,345 8.5% 945,517

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 5,474,777 5,474,777 206,879 - 5,267,899 3.8% 462,550 Materials, Supplies & Servs. 4,230,172 4,230,172 251,360 461,912 3,516,900 16.9% 207,586 Special Projects 130,093 212,666 (330) 47,862 165,133 22.4% (330) Transfer-Out 4,600 4,600 - - 4,600 0.0% -
Capital Outlay Transfers 1,055,000 1,055,000 53,333 - 1,001,667 5.1% 53,333 Equipment 28,000 28,000 - - 28,000 0.0% -
Appropriated Reserve 10,000 10,000 - - 10,000 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 11,015,215 10,932,642 511,243 509,774 9,994,198 9.3% 723,140 Revenue Less Expense 26,347 108,920 431,974 (509,774) 104,147 222,377 Miscellaneous

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

DOWNTOWN PARKING FUND

Page 12 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Leases-Commercial/Industrial 6,628,015 6,628,015 453,165 - 6,174,851 6.8% 472,986 Leases-Terminal 15,419,653 15,419,653 852,527 - 14,567,127 5.5% 774,584 Leases-Non-Commercial Aviation 6,189,103 6,189,103 387,031 - 5,802,072 6.3% 381,931 Leases-Commercial Aviation 8,372,628 8,372,628 332,430 - 8,040,198 4.0% 434,312 Investment Income 756,000 756,000 60,883 - 695,117 8.1% 80,303 Service Charges 1,719 1,719 - - 1,719 0.0% -
Miscellaneous & Ins. Proceed 54,035 54,035 1,690 - 52,345 3.1% 1,600 Operating Transfers-In 7,000,000 7,000,000 361 - 6,999,639 0.0% - TOTAL REVENUES 44,421,154 44,421,154 2,088,086 - 42,333,068 4.7% 2,145,716

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 15,089,726 15,089,726 499,417 - 14,590,309 3.3% 972,452 Materials, Supplies & Services 17,992,365 19,243,664 837,673 2,702,490 15,703,500 18.4% 848,238 Special Projects 1,062,000 4,617,235 (1,579) 2,649,853 1,968,961 57.4% (350) Transfer-Out - - 26,602 - (26,602) 0.0% 22,482
Debt Service 1,555,205 1,555,205 129,689 - 1,425,516 8.3% 129,689 Capital Outlay Transfers 5,868,380 5,868,380 707,452 - 5,160,928 12.1% 707,452 Equipment 253,806 328,321 901 74,515 252,905 23.0% 14,487 Other - 4,000 - 4,000 - 100.0% -
Appropriated Reserve 131,556 131,556 - - 131,556 0.0% - TOTAL EXPENSES 46,838,087 41,953,038 2,200,154 5,430,858 39,207,074 16.3% 2,694,449 Revenue Less Expense (2,416,933) 2,468,116 (112,068) (5,430,858) 3,125,993 (548,733) Miscellaneous

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

AIRPORT OPERATING FUND

Page 13 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Fees & Card Sales 5,076,993 5,076,993 464,124 - 4,612,869 9.1% 499,238 Investment Income 210,000 210,000 13,548 - 196,452 6.5% 25,153 Rents & Concessions 242,550 242,550 19,183 - 223,367 7.9% 18,518 Miscellaneous - - 248 - (248) 0.0% 339
TOTAL REVENUES 5,529,543 5,529,543 497,103 - 5,032,440 9.0% 543,248

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 213,512 213,512 4,760 - 208,753 2.2% 9,808 Materials, Supplies & Srvs. 4,091,256 4,091,256 151,041 - 3,940,215 3.7% 120,050 Special Projects - 99 (99) - 199 0.0% (99)
Capital Outlay Transfers 2,225,000 2,225,000 139,167 - 2,085,833 6.3% 139,167 TOTAL EXPENSES 6,529,868 6,529,768 294,867 - 6,235,000 4.5% 268,925 Revenue Less Expense (1,000,325) (1,000,225) 202,236 - (1,202,560) 274,323 Miscellaneous

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

GOLF COURSE FUND

Page 14 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Service Charges 3,239,851 3,239,851 267,617 - 2,972,234 8.3% 267,617 Work Orders - Bldg Maint. 5,125,511 5,125,511 414,347 - 4,711,164 8.1% 411,120 Miscellaneous & Ins. Proceed 5,500 5,500 - - 5,500 0.0% - TOTAL REVENUES 8,370,862 8,370,862 681,964 - 7,688,898 8.1% 678,737

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 4,552,518 4,552,518 160,830 - 4,391,688 3.5% 296,341 Materials, Supplies & Svcs. 3,170,948 3,231,867 127,946 1,115,118 1,988,804 38.5% 148,526 Special Projects 547,846 763,313 (403) 434,387 329,329 56.9% 716 Equipment 5,000 5,000 - 2,838 2,162 56.8% 17,250
Appropriated Reserve 39,000 39,000 - - 39,000 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 8,591,699 8,315,312 288,374 1,552,343 6,750,982 21.4% 462,833 Revenue Less Expense (220,836) 55,551 393,591 (1,552,343) 937,917 215,905

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FUND

Page 15 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Vehicle Rental Charges 6,608,613 6,608,613 534,202 - 6,074,411 8.1% 424,991 Investment Income 1,158,148 1,158,148 89,050 - 1,069,099 7.7% 128,754 Rents & Concessions 102,990 102,990 8,598 - 94,392 8.3% 8,598 Miscellaneous& Auction Proceed 68,000 68,000 - - 68,000 0.0% - Operating Transfers-In 40,000 40,000 3,244 - 36,756 0.0% - TOTAL REVENUES 7,977,751 7,977,751 635,093 - 7,342,658 8.0% 562,344

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 222,775 222,775 8,598 - 214,177 3.9% 16,352 Materials, Supplies & Svcs. 2,079,230 2,099,426 8,546 23,482 2,067,398 1.5% 6,661 Special Projects - 54,138 - - 54,138 0.0% -
Debt Service 606,371 606,371 - - 606,371 0.0% -
Capitalized Fixed Assets 7,329,928 16,688,950 - 2,394,311 14,294,638 14.3% - TOTAL EXPENSES 19,671,660 10,238,304 17,144 2,417,793 17,236,723 12.4% 23,013 Revenue Less Expense (11,693,909) (2,260,553) 617,949 (2,417,793) (9,894,065) 539,330

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

FLEET REPLACEMENT FUND

Page 16 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Vehicle Maintenance Charges 3,969,541 3,969,541 334,053 - 3,635,487 8.4% 333,164 Reimbursements - - 417 - (417) 0.0% 417
Miscellaneous 127,252 127,252 9,665 - 117,587 7.6% 9,665 TOTAL REVENUES 4,096,793 4,096,793 344,135 - 3,752,658 8.4% 343,246

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 2,057,804 2,057,804 68,223 - 1,989,581 3.3% 138,930 Materials, Supplies & Svcs. 1,997,345 1,997,345 131,517 463,742 1,402,086 29.8% 118,612 Special Projects 56,854 57,560 6,731 20,000 30,829 46.4% 6,944 Equipment 40,884 40,884 24,670 5,596 10,618 74.0% -
Appropriated Reserve 15,000 15,000 - - 15,000 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 4,168,593 4,167,887 231,141 489,338 3,448,114 17.3% 264,486 Revenue Less Expense (71,800) (71,094) 112,994 (489,338) 304,544 78,760

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

FLEET MAINTENANCE FUND

Page 17 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Insurance Premiums 18,554,959 18,554,959 1,355,289 - 17,199,670 7.3% 1,300,075 Workers' Compensation Premiums 9,229,906 9,229,906 697,448 - 8,532,458 7.6% 698,489 OSH Charges 361,744 361,744 30,145 - 331,599 8.3% 29,104 Unemployment Insurance Premiums 191,912 191,912 15,993 - 175,919 8.3% 15,993 Investment Income 422,000 422,000 33,390 - 388,610 7.9% 35,370 Operating Transfers-In 75,825 75,825 6,319 - 69,506 8.3% 6,319 TOTAL REVENUES 28,836,346 28,836,346 2,138,583 - 26,697,763 7.4% 2,085,349

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 1,113,469 1,113,469 41,066 - 1,072,403 3.7% 86,309 Materials, Supplies & Services 26,284,645 26,927,226 964,793 1,081,252 24,881,182 7.6% 956,244 Special Projects - 5,550 (26) - 5,576 -0.5% (26)
Capital Outlay Transfers 408,225 408,225 - - 408,225 0.0% - Equipment 5,000 5,000 - - 5,000 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 28,459,471 27,811,340 1,005,833 1,081,252 26,372,385 7.3% 1,042,527 Revenue Less Expense 376,875 1,025,006 1,132,750 (1,081,252) 325,377 1,042,823 The Self Insurance Trust Fund is an internal service fund of the City, which accounts for the cost of providing workers' compensation, property and liability insurance as well as unemployment insurance and certain self-insured employee benefits on a city-wide basis. Internal Service Funds charge other funds for the cost of providing their specific services.

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

SELF INSURANCE TRUST FUND

Page 18 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Service charges 10,340,051 10,340,051 825,794 - 9,514,257 8.0% 825,794 Operating Transfers-In 480,471 480,471 41,766 - 438,705 8.7% 35,286 TOTAL REVENUES 10,820,522 10,820,522 867,560 - 9,952,962 8.0% 861,080

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 6,575,061 6,575,061 210,780 - 6,364,282 3.2% 417,644 Materials, Supplies & Services 4,248,044 4,248,925 1,001,963 373,829 2,873,133 32.4% 953,960 Capital Outlay Transfers - - 21,466 - (21,466) 0.0% 21,466 Equipment 197,440 201,543 731 28,818 171,994 14.7% (78) TOTAL EXPENSES 11,025,530 11,020,545 1,234,939 402,647 9,387,944 14.9% 1,392,991 Revenue Less Expense (205,007) (200,023) (367,379) (402,647) 565,018 (531,911)

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND

Page 19 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Leases - Commercial 2,397,000 2,397,000 282,042 - 2,114,958 11.8% 17,697 Leases - Food Service 2,675,000 2,675,000 380,695 - 2,294,305 14.2% 258,093 Slip Rental Fees 7,626,614 7,626,614 603,900 - 7,022,714 7.9% 545,005 Visitors Fees 785,000 785,000 60,588 - 724,413 7.7% 64,171 Slip Transfer Fees 950,000 950,000 40,625 - 909,375 4.3% 94,650 Parking Revenue 4,822,180 4,822,180 445,875 - 4,376,305 9.2% 422,791 Wharf Parking 425,000 425,000 42,868 - 382,132 10.1% 37,104 Other Fees & Charges 224,353 224,353 20,275 - 204,078 9.0% 20,801 Investment Income 555,500 555,500 41,747 - 513,753 7.5% 68,373 Rents & Concessions 473,700 473,700 37,585 - 436,115 7.9% 41,801 Miscellaneous 633,800 633,800 59,519 - 574,281 9.4% 21,020 TOTAL REVENUES 21,568,147 21,568,147 2,015,719 - 19,552,428 9.3% 1,591,504

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 9,819,745 9,819,745 382,610 - 9,437,135 3.9% 736,671 Materials, Supplies & Svcs. 8,661,911 8,830,149 366,831 660,921 7,802,397 11.6% 436,181 Special Projects 339,100 373,327 10,401 42,500 320,426 14.2% 40,720 Debt Service 2,023,048 2,023,048 889,263 - 1,133,785 44.0% 889,263 Capital Outlay Transfers 2,235,000 2,235,000 216,250 - 2,018,750 9.7% 216,250 Equipment 90,500 90,500 97 6,000 84,403 6.7% 3,135
Other 10,000 12,500 - 2,500 10,000 20.0% -
Appropriated Reserve 100,000 100,000 - - 100,000 0.0% - TOTAL EXPENSES 23,484,268 23,279,304 1,865,452 711,921 20,906,896 11.0% 2,322,220 Revenue Less Expense (1,916,121) (1,711,157) 150,267 (711,921) (1,354,468) (730,716) Miscellaneous

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

WATERFRONT OPERATING FUND

Page 20 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Service Charges 38,290,644 38,290,644 - - 38,290,644 0.0% - Investment Income 380,000 380,000 295 - 379,705 0.1% 55,165 Rents & Concessions 15,067 15,067 5,023 - 10,043 33.3% 5,023 Fed Tax Crd. EV Vehicles - - 2,473 - (2,473) 0.0% -
TOTAL REVENUES 38,685,711 38,685,711 7,792 - 38,677,919 0.0% 60,188

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 2,064,980 2,064,980 66,484 - 1,998,496 3.2% 139,654 Materials, Supplies & Svcs. 35,513,900 39,280,822 271,071 3,952,763 35,056,988 10.8% 4,727,057 Special Projects 2,786,626 3,509,640 17,328 233,542 3,258,770 7.1% 26,273 Equipment 118,040 118,040 - - 118,040 0.0% 260
Other 382,906 382,906 - - 382,906 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 45,356,388 40,866,452 354,883 4,186,305 40,815,199 10.0% 4,893,243 Revenue Less Expense (6,670,677) (2,180,741) (347,091) (4,186,305) (2,137,280) (4,833,055)

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

SANTA BARBARA CLEAN ENERGY FUND

Page 21 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Service charges 2,286,149 2,286,149 185,086 - 2,101,063 8.1% 185,086 Miscellaneous - - - - - 0.0% 3,684
TOTAL REVENUES 2,286,149 2,286,149 185,086 - 2,101,063 8.1% 188,770

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 84,930 84,930 3,213 - 81,717 3.8% 6,571 Materials, Supplies & Svcs. 2,081,848 2,117,398 13,658 35,551 2,068,190 2.3% 7,903 Special Projects 201,518 434,518 22,603 54,131 357,784 17.7% 4,908 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,636,847 2,368,296 39,473 89,682 2,507,691 4.9% 19,382 Revenue Less Expense (350,697) (82,147) 145,613 (89,682) (406,628) 169,388 Miscellaneous

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For Firsth Month Ended July 31, 2026 (8.3 % of Fiscal Year)

ENERGY AND CLIMATE MANAGEMENT FUND

Page 22 ends

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Council Agenda Report
Agenda Date: September 29, 2026
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: City Administrator’s Office
Subject: Notice of Biennial Conflict of Interest Code Resolution Update Recommendation:

That Council approve the City Clerk’s Office’s recommendation to amend Resolution No. 24- 134, the City’s Conflict of Interest Code.

Discussion
California’s Political Reform Act requires that cities review their Conflict of Interest Code (Code) biennially and submit any changes to the City Council within 90 days from when the notice is approved. The Code lists the positions that have been designated to file the Statement of Economic Interest (Form 700) annually and upon assuming or leaving the position. This year, the Code needs to be amended so that new positions can be added, as well as to revise certain positions whose titles have been revised.

Staff will return to Council with the updated Conflict of Interest Code Resolution within 90 days from September 29, 2026, and if the updated Resolution is approved, it will become effective January 1, 2027.

Budget/Financial Information
There is no fiscal impact.

Attachment:

1. 2026 Local Agency Biennial Notice
Prepared and
Submitted by: Norma Welche, CMC, Deputy City Clerk
Approved by: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
Agenda Item No. 7
www.fppc.ca.gov
FPPC Advice: [email protected] (866.275.3772)

Page 1 of 1 ends

2026 Local Agency Biennial Notice
Name of Agency:

Mailing Address:

Contact Person: Phone No.

Email: Alternate Email:

Accurate disclosure is essential to monitor whether officials have conflicts of interest and to help ensure public trust in government. The biennial review examines current programs to ensure that the agency’s code includes disclosure by those agency officials who make or participate in making governmental decisions.

This agency has reviewed its conflict of interest code and has determined that (check one BOX):

An amendment is required. The following amendments are necessary:
(Check all that apply.)
Include new positions
Revise disclosure categories
Revise the titles of existing positions
Delete titles of positions that have been abolished and/or positions that no longer make or participate in making governmental decisions
Other (describe)
The code is currently under review by the code reviewing body.

No amendment is required. (If your code is over five years old, amendments may be necessary.)
Verification (to be completed if no amendment is required) This agency’s code accurately designates all positions that make or participate in the making of governmental decisions. The disclosure assigned to those positions accurately requires that all investments, business positions, interests in real property, and sources of income that may foreseeably be affected materially by the decisions made by those holding designated positions are reported. The code includes all other provisions required by Government Code Section 87302.
__________________________________________ _________________________ Signature of Chief Executive Officer Date
All agencies must complete and return this notice regardless of how recently your code was approved or amended. Please return this notice no later than October 1, 2026, or by the date specified by your agency, if earlier, to:
(PLACE RETURN ADDRESS OF CODE REVIEWING BODY HERE)
PLEASE DO NOT RETURN THIS FORM TO THE FPPC.

City of Santa Barbara
735 Anacapa Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Norma Welche 805-564-5309
[email protected]
✔
✔
✔
✔

ATTACHMENT

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Council Agenda Report
Agenda Date: September 29, 2026
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Human Resources Department
Subject: Approval of Benefit Plans Effective January 1, 2027 Recommendation:

That Council:

A. Approve the 2027 renewal rates and benefit plan renewals described in Attachments 1 and 2 for the: CalPERS Health Benefits Program; Delta Dental plans; Vision Service Plan vision plans; Optum Employee Assistance Program; Discovery Benefits Health and Dependent Care Flexible Spending Accounts; and The Standard Insurance Company life, accidental death and dismemberment, and disability insurance plans; B. Authorize the City Administrator, or designee, to execute the agreements, renewals, and amendments necessary to implement the approved 2027 benefit plan renewals, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney and provided that such documents are consistent with the rates, benefits, and fiscal impacts presented to the Council and do not materially increase City cost or materially alter benefits without further Council authorization; and C. Acknowledge that the Benefit Coordinators Corporation benefits-administration agreement remains in effect through June 30, 2027, at a fee of $7.20 per enrolled employee per month; no amendment is requested through this action.

Discussion
Each year, the City obtains renewal rates and new benefits for the benefit plans covering its eligible active and retired employees. These benefit plans include: Medical; Dental; Vision; Employee Assistance Program (EAP); Health Flexible Spending Accounts (FSA); Dependent Care Flexible Spending Accounts (DCA-FSA); Term Life Insurance; and Disability Insurance programs.

Staff coordinated this renewal process with the CalPERS Health Program and with the City’s benefits broker, USI Insurance Services. The Employee Benefits Committee, comprised of members from the various employee groups, has been apprised of the renewal information and Agenda Item No. 8
Council Agenda Report
Approval of Benefit Plans Effective January 1, 2027

Page 2 ends

the renewal rates. Staff recommends that the City renew its agreements with all current medical, dental, vision, term life, and disability insurance and EAP plan providers.

Medical Plans
The City has contracted with CalPERS Health Program to provide medical insurance coverage to City of Santa Barbara employees since January 1, 2020. The CalPERS Health Program allows the City to offer employees and retirees a variety of health plans that best fit their health care needs. The CalPERS Health Program offers several medical plans in Santa Barbara County including the Anthem Traditional HMO, Blue Shield Access+ HMO, Blue Shield Trio HMO, PERS Gold PPO, PERS Platinum PPO and PORAC PPO for members of the Peace Officers Research Association of California (PORAC). Further, employees who reside in Ventura County or Los Angeles County have access to additional plans such as the Anthem Select HMO, Kaiser Permanente HMO, and HealthNet Salud y Mas HMO.

Under the CalPERS Health Benefits Program, retirees under the age of 65 have access to the same health plan options as active employees and at the same rates. Medicare eligible retirees have several Medicare Supplement plan options.

Health premiums for Region 2, which includes Santa Barbara and Ventura County, overall will increase an average of 8.25% for the HMO plans, 6.75% for the PPO plans (PERS GOLD and PERS Platinum). The PORAC PPO plan, available only to members of the Peace Officer Research Association of California, will have a 3.5% decrease to their 2027 premiums.

CalPERS’ health plans and premiums remain competitive as they are the second largest purchasers of health insurance in the United States, after the federal government.

Dental Plans
There are three dental plans available for employees to select from. They are the DeltaCare HMO plan, the Delta Dental DPO plan, and the Delta Dental Buy-Up DPO plan. The Delta Dental PPO plans are similar to a medical PPO model plan in that they have a larger provider network, and it indemnifies the enrollees to select a provider of their choosing without the need to predesignate a primary care dentist. The DeltaCare HMO plan is similar to a medical HMO model plan with a small provider network, and the enrollee is required to select a primary care dentist within Delta’s network.

For 2027, DeltaCare HMO Plan 12A will be changed to DeltaCare HMO 12I, which will include an implant benefit while keeping the plan premium unchanged. Delta Dental will be lowering the Council Agenda Report
Approval of Benefit Plans Effective January 1, 2027

Page 3 ends

rates for the Delta Dental DPO plan and Delta Dental Buy-Up DPO by 10% for 2027 while keeping benefits the same.

Rates for all three plans are displayed in Attachment 2.

Vision Plan
There are two vision plans available for employees to select from. They are VSP Basic and VSP Buy-Up Option. Plan benefits and plan premiums for both vision plans remain unchanged for 2027.

Employee Assistance Program (EAP) – Employer Paid Fees
OptumHealth Behavioral Solutions provides outpatient psychological services for the City’s EAP. No increase is proposed for the 2027 EAP rate.

Flexible Spending Accounts (FSA) – Employer Paid Fees
The Health and Dependent Care Flexible Spending Accounts are administered by Discovery Benefits. No increases are proposed for the 2027 FSA fees.

Basic Life/AD&D and Disability Insurance – Employer Paid Premiums The Standard Insurance Company provides the Basic Term Life/Accidental Death & Dismemberment (AD&D) and Long-Term Disability Insurance plans. No increases are proposed for the 2027 rates from the Standard.

Employee and Spouse Supplemental Life Insurance Plans – Employee Paid Premiums
The Standard Insurance Company provides the voluntary employee-paid supplemental Term Life Insurance plans offered to all benefited employees. No increases are proposed for the 2027 rates.

Short Term Disability Insurance Plan – Employee Paid Premiums The Standard Insurance Company provides voluntary employee-paid Short-Term Disability Insurance plans to employees in the Management, Fire Management and Police Management Groups. No increases are proposed for the 2027 rates.

Council Agenda Report
Approval of Benefit Plans Effective January 1, 2027

Page 4 ends

Benefits Administration Fee
As of July 1, 2020, the City contracted with Benefit Coordinators Corporation (BCC) for online enrollment and electronic benefits administration. There is an administration fee of $7.20 per enrolled employee per month. The current agreement with the Benefits Administration vendor keeps those fees unchanged until June 30, 2027.

Summary
Staff recommends that the CalPERS Health Benefits Program along with the Delta Dental DPO plans, DeltaCare HMO plan, VSP Vision plans, Optum EAP, Discovery Benefits FSAs, Standard Life/AD&D and Disability Insurance plans be renewed for 2027 at the proposed premium rates.

Proposed 2027 monthly rates for the CalPERS Health Benefits Plans for Active employees are listed in Attachment 1.

Proposed 2027 monthly rates for Delta Dental PPO, Delta Dental Buy-up PPO plan, VSP Vision, VSP Buy-up plan, Optum EAP, Discovery Benefits FSA, Standard Life/AD&D and Disability Insurance Plans are listed in Attachment 2.

Budget/Financial Information
Established City contribution amounts and employee pre-tax payroll deductions will fund the 2027 Plan Year (calendar year) estimated overall benefit premium increase.

Attachments:

1. 2026-2027 Medical Plans Monthly Premium Rates

2. 2027 Dental, Vision, Employee Assistance Program, Flexible Spending Accounts, Life and Disability Insurance Plan Monthly Premium Rates
Prepared by: Charlie Lam, Benefits Analyst II
Submitted by: Michael Arnoldus, Human Resources Director Approved by: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
2025 and 2026 Health Plan Rates Attachment 1
Single 2-Party Family Single 2-Party Family
Anthem Blue Cross Select HMO $1,336.29 $2,672.58 $3,474.35 $1,486.44 $2,972.88 $3,864.74 Anthem Blue Cross Traditional HMO $1,612.08 $3,224.16 $4,191.41 $1,732.52 $3,465.04 $4,504.55 Blue Shield Access+ HMO / EPO $1,301.95 $2,603.90 $3,385.07 $1,479.12 $2,958.24 $3,845.71 Blue Shield Trio $1,166.58 $2,333.16 $3,033.11 $1,202.57 $2,405.14 $3,126.68 Kaiser Permanente $1,168.86 $2,337.72 $3,039.04 $1,187.63 $2,375.26 $3,087.84 Sutter Health N/A N/A N/A $1,130.67 $2,261.34 $2,939.74 Western Health Advantage $969.58 $1,939.16 $2,520.91 $1,030.80 $2,061.60 $2,680.08 PERS Gold $1,120.58 $2,241.16 $2,913.51 $1,215.17 $2,430.34 $3,159.44 PERS Platinum $1,670.14 $3,340.28 $4,342.36 $1,778.62 $3,557.24 $4,624.41 PORAC (Peace Officers Research Association)
PPO $1,063.00 $2,418.00 $3,027.00 $1,095.00 $2,395.00 $3,115.00 Anthem Blue Cross Select HMO $1,016.32 $2,032.64 $2,642.43 $1,140.20 $2,280.40 $2,964.52 Anthem Blue Cross Traditional HMO $1,158.26 $2,316.52 $3,011.48 $1,263.81 $2,527.62 $3,285.91 Blue Shield Access+ HMO / EPO $1,052.89 $2,105.78 $2,737.51 $1,177.77 $2,355.54 $3,062.20 Blue Shield Trio $936.58 $1,873.16 $2,435.11 $971.24 $1,942.48 $2,525.22 Health Net Salud y Más $879.57 $1,759.14 $2,286.88 $953.15 $1,906.30 $2,478.19 Kaiser Permanente $987.69 $1,975.38 $2,567.99 $1,030.94 $2,061.88 $2,680.44 Sharp Performance Plus $916.20 $1,832.40 $2,382.12 $975.21 $1,950.42 $2,535.55 PERS Gold $956.28 $1,912.56 $2,486.33 $1,010.12 $2,020.24 $2,626.31 PERS Platinum $1,426.24 $2,852.48 $3,708.22 $1,538.57 $3,077.14 $4,000.28 PORAC (Peace Officers Research Association)
PPO $1,057.00 $2,127.00 $2,708.00 $1,020.00 $2,040.00 $2,650.00 Anthem Blue Cross Select HMO $962.68 $1,925.36 $2,502.97 $1,059.06 $2,118.12 $2,753.56 Anthem Blue Cross Traditional HMO $1,128.53 $2,257.06 $2,934.18 $1,239.02 $2,478.04 $3,221.45 Blue Shield Access+ HMO $917.90 $1,835.82 $2,386.57 $975.19 $1,950.38 $2,535.49 Blue Shield Trio $852.56 $1,705.12 $2,216.66 $908.01 $1,816.02 $2,360.83 Health Net Salud y Más $740.11 $1,480.22 $1,924.29 $801.75 $1,603.50 $2,084.55 Kaiser Permanente $969.05 $1,938.10 $2,519.53 $1,011.28 $2,022.56 $2,629.33 PERS Gold $960.03 $1,920.06 $2,496.08 $1,014.50 $2,029.00 $2,637.70 PERS Platinum $1,431.81 $2,863.62 $3,722.71 $1,549.00 $3,098.00 $4,027.40 PORAC (Peace Officers Research Association)
PPO $1,057.00 $2,127.00 $2,708.00 $1,020.00 $2,040.00 $2,650.00 Please note that, effective January 1, 2027, CalPERS will no longer offer the UnitedHealthcare SignatureValue Alliance or UnitedHealthcare SignatureValue Harmony HMO plans due to a dispute over renewal rates. This change will not affect City of Santa Barbara employees, as no employees are currently enrolled in either plan
2027
Region 1 (Northern California counties such as Monterey, Napa, San Francisco, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, etc.) Region 2 (Fresno, Imperial, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Madera, Orange, San Diego, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Tulare, and Ventura Counties)
Region 3 (Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties) Basic Medical Plan Premiums 2026
2025 and 2026 Health Plan Rates Attachment 1

no employees are currently enrolled in either plan.

Attachment 2
2027 Dental, Vision, Employee Assistance Program, Flexible Spending Accounts, Disability and Life Insurance Plans Monthly Premium Rates PLAN CURRENT 2026 PROPOSED 2027
Delta Dental DPO Plan
Employee Only $51.18 $46.06
Employee and One Dependent $90.58 $81.52
Employee and Family $145.18 $130.66
Delta Dental Buy-Up DPO Plan
Employee Only $60.34 $54.31
Employee and One Dependent $106.80 $96.12
Employee and Family $171.18 $154.06
DeltaCare HMO Plan
Employee Only $15.57 $15.57
Employee and One Dependent $27.85 $27.85
Employee and Family $41.21 $41.21
Vision Service Plan (VSP)
Employee Only $6.93 $6.93
Employee and One Dependent $13.76 $13.76
Employee and Family $21.10 $21.10
Vision Service Plan (VSP) Buy-Up Plan
Employee Only $9.04 $9.04
Employee and One Dependent $17.95 $17.95
Employee and Family $27.52 $27.52
Optum Employee Assistance Program (City Paid)
Employee and Family $1.78 $1.78
Discovery Benefits Flexible Spending Accounts Administration Costs (City Paid) Health Care Account/Participant/Month $3.75 $3.75
Dependent Care Account/Participant/Month $3.75 $3.75
Electronic Payment Card/Participant/Month $0.00 $0.00
Grace Period Processing/Participant/Month $0.00 $0.00
Long Term Disability Insurance – Standard (City Paid)
All Employees except Police and Fire $0.29/$100 $0.29/$100 Short Term Disability Insurance – Standard (Voluntary Employee Paid) Managers $22.02 $22.02
Supervisors $19.82 $19.82
Police $15.14 $15.14
Basic Life AD&D Insurance – Standard (City Paid)
All Employees $0.100/$1,000 $0.100/$1,000
Supplemental Employee, Spouse & Child Life Insurance–Standard (Voluntary Employee Paid) Voluntary Employee and Spouse Life Insurance Rates/$10,000 Rates/$10,000 Up to and including age 29 $0.68 $0.68
Age 30-34 $0.86 $0.86
Age 35-39 $1.24 $1.24
Age 40-44 $1.90 $1.90
Age 45-49 $3.14 $3.14
Age 50-54 $5.24 $5.24
Age 55-59 $8.46 $8.46
Age 60-64 $11.12 $11.12
Age 65-69 $17.48 $17.48
Attachment
2 2027
Age 70-74 $30.88 $30.88
Age 75 and older $51.50 $51.50
$2,000 Voluntary Child Life Insurance $0.33 $0.33
$5,000 Voluntary Child Life Insurance $0.55 $0.55
$10,000 Voluntary Child Life Insurance $0.89 $0.89

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Council Agenda Report
Agenda Date: September 29, 2026
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Community Development Department
Subject: Local Coastal Program Amendment – 1 Hot Springs Road [Ordinance Introduction; Resolution]
Recommendation:

That Council:

A. Introduce and subsequently adopt, by reading of title only, an Ordinance of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending the Zoning Map in Title APX Sectional Maps to Rezone the Property located at 1 Hot Springs (APN 017-393-002 and -003) from R-1/SD-3 (OneFamily Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/ Coastal Overlay) Zone;
B. Adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending the Local Coastal Program to change the coastal land use designation of 1 Hot Springs Road (APN 017-393-002 and -003) from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac) and to Rezone the property from R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/ Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) Zone; C. Read the titles of the Ordinances and Resolutions and, if there is no objection from any Councilmember present, waive further reading pursuant to Section 511 of the Santa Barbara City Charter;
D. Adopt the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program dated July 24, 2026, making the findings specified in this Council Agenda Report; and
E. Determine that the Coastal Land Use designation change and Zoning Map Amendment are consistent with the Coastal Land Use Plan and City Charter.

Agenda Item No. 9
Council Agenda Report
Local Coastal Program Amendment – 1 Hot Springs Road [Ordinance Introduction; Resolution]

Page 2 ends

Discussion
Project Description
On behalf of the property owner, Santa Barbara Cemetery Association, the applicant, Brian Holland, 1 HSR GP, LLC, is requesting a Local Coastal Program (LCP) Amendment, to change the coastal land use designation of approximately 2.5 acres located at the intersection of E. Cabrillo Boulevard and Channel Drive (APNs 017-393-002 and -003) from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac), and to change the zone from R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/Coastal Overlay).

The map above shows the existing Parks/Open Space land use designation of 1 Hot Springs and the land use designation of the surrounding area. The proposed land use designation for 1 Hot Springs is Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac).

Santa Barbara Cemetery
Old Coast Highway Hwy 101
Los Patos Way
Coast Village Rd
E Cabrillo Blvd COUNTY
Project Site
Council Agenda Report
Local Coastal Program Amendment – 1 Hot Springs Road [Ordinance Introduction; Resolution]

Page 3 ends

The map above shows the existing R-1/SD-3 zoning of 1 Hot Springs and zoning of the surrounding area. The proposed zoning of 1 Hot Springs is R-3/SD-3.

Background
The project site comprises two adjoining parcels: APN 017-393-002, a 2.4-acre lot bounded on the south by Channel Drive, on the west by East Cabrillo Boulevard, and by the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and U.S. Highway 101 on the north side of the lot, and APN 017-393-003, a 0.11- acre lot adjacent to Channel Drive. The project site is vacant except for a cellular tower at the northeastern portion of the lot and the Charles Caldwell Watering Trough and Fountain at the corner of East Cabrillo Boulevard and Channel Drive. Constructed in 1911–1912, the fountain is a City Landmark. In 2025, the City and Santa Barbara Cemetery Association completed a land swap such that now the Cemetery is the sole owner of APN 017-393-003 and the City owns a small area of APN 017-393-002 encompassing the watering trough and fountain.

When initially submitted, the project included a proposal for a new multi-unit residential development. This proposal was reviewed conceptually by the Planning Commission on August 15, 2024, and consisted of 22 rental units with four units (20 percent) proposed to be restricted to low-income households. When the project went to Planning Commission for a recommendation on the rezone and land use designation on August 13, 2026, it was noted that the associated development project had been revised to include two units (10 percent) restricted to lower-income households. However, the applicant has since indicated that that Project Site
Santa Barbara Cemetery
Hwy 101
E Cabrillo Blvd
Los Patos Way
Old Coast Highway
Coast Village Rd
COUNTY
Council Agenda Report
Local Coastal Program Amendment – 1 Hot Springs Road [Ordinance Introduction; Resolution]

Page 4 ends

proposal is no longer feasible, due in part to rising construction costs, and they are looking at alternative housing development options. In the coastal zone, there is currently no inclusionary requirement for rental housing.1 Any future development on this site would require a Coastal Development Permit and Historic Landmarks Commission approval of the design because the project site is in El Pueblo Viejo Landmark District.

On August 15, 2024, the Planning Commission initiated the request for a Local Coastal Program Amendment, commenting that the project site was suitable for multi-unit housing development and that the proposed residential density was appropriate.

An Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the project was prepared to analyze the land use change as well as the proposed future residential development. The public review period for the draft MND was completed on June 15, 2026. On August 13, 2026, Planning Commission adopted the final MND and Mitigation Monitoring Program and unanimously recommended that City Council approve the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment for the rezone and change to the coastal land use designation.

Analysis
The project site is currently zoned R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay), which allows for single-unit residential development (one unit per lot). This zoning designation is inconsistent with the existing Parks/Open Space Coastal Land Use Plan designation, which is intended to protect and preserve park, beach, and open space, but does not allow for residential uses. The site, owned by the Santa Barbara Cemetery Association, has historically been vacant, and a park has not been planned at this location. By changing the Coastal Land Use Plan designation from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac), and the zoning designation from R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/ Coastal Overlay), the underutilized vacant site would allow for residential development at a higher density than one unit. In the R-3 zone, for lots of 14,000 square feet or more of net lot area, a minimum of 3,500 square feet of net lot area is required per unit (SBMC §28.21.080); therefore, approximately 30 units would be allowed at the project site. Rental projects could use the variable density provisions, which could allow for more units 1 One of the recommendations that came out of the Inclusionary Housing and In-Lieu Fee Study was to require inclusionary housing (10% of units affordable to moderate-income households) as part of all rental housing projects, including in the coastal zone. However, these ordinance amendments have not yet been adopted by City Council (scheduled for Ordinance Committee on October 6, 2026). The applicant has indicated that they will be submitting an SB-330 Preliminary Application to lock in our current rules and regulations, so they would not be subject to future ordinance amendments that require affordable housing.

Council Agenda Report
Local Coastal Program Amendment – 1 Hot Springs Road [Ordinance Introduction; Resolution]

Page 5 ends

on the site depending on bedroom count. The proposed land use and zoning amendments satisfy the City’s goal to provide opportunities for multi-unit housing contiguous to existing developed areas on an otherwise vacant lot in proximity to coastal resources, public resources, and commercial services.

The proposed amendments would also make the subject site more consistent with residential development allowed on Los Patos Way (zoned HRC-2/S-D-3, land use designation of Hotel and Related Commerce II/Medium High Residential (max. 27 du/ac)) and Coast Village Road (zoned C-1/S-D-3, land use designation of Commercial/Medium High Residential (max 27 du/ac)). The reason staff supports a density lower than these surrounding areas (12 du/ac rather than 27 du/ac) is because it provides a transition between County zoning to the south and east, and City zoning to the north and west. The Medium Density land use designation is described in the Coastal Land Use Plan as a transition area between single-unit areas and higher density areas.

The proposal would be consistent with LUP Policy 2.1-15 (Maintenance and Enhancement of Public Access) as the project would not inhibit public access to the coast, as well as Coastal Act Policy 30250 and LUP Policy 2.1-16 (Siting of New Development) by providing new residential development in proximity to adequate public services where it will not have significant effects, either individually or cumulatively, on coastal resources. Additional analysis for consistency with the proposed Coastal Land Use Plan and zoning designation is provided in the Planning Commission Staff Report (Attachment 1).

Findings
The City Council, by five affirmative votes, must make the following findings in accordance with the City Charter, the Local Coastal Program, and the Santa Barbara Municipal Code to amend the zoning map and land use designation in the Coastal Land Use Plan:

1. The Local Costal Program Amendment to change the coastal land use designation from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac) is appropriate because the proposed land use designation allows for residential development on a vacant lot that would be consistent with residential uses and density allowed on nearby Los Patos Way and Coast Village Road.

2. The Zoning Map Amendment to change the zone from R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) Zone is appropriate because the zoning designation would allow for multi-unit residential development that would be consistent with allowed residential uses and Council Agenda Report
Local Coastal Program Amendment – 1 Hot Springs Road [Ordinance Introduction; Resolution]

Page 6 ends

density on nearby Los Patos Way and Coastal Village Road on a vacant lot in proximity to coastal resources, public resources, and commercial services in the city.

3. California Environmental Quality Act Findings.
a. The Final Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act requirements and constitutes adequate environmental analysis of the project.
b. On the basis of the whole administrative record, including the initial study, draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The applicant has agreed to the identified mitigation measures. c. Revisions to the project and the incorporation of mitigation measures will avoid or reduce all potentially significant impacts to a less-than-significant level. d. The Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Santa Barbara.
e. The custodian of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based is the Community Development Department located at 630 Garden Street, Santa Barbara, California 93101.
f. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15074 and Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. and is included in the final Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project and is hereby adopted.

Next Steps
If Council approves the LCP Amendment, it will be forwarded to the California Coastal Commission (CCC) for certification. The amendment will take effect automatically upon CCC certification, unless the CCC proposes modifications to the proposed LCP Amendment.

Budget/Financial Information
The LCP Amendment is an administrative action with no budget implications.

Council Agenda Report
Local Coastal Program Amendment – 1 Hot Springs Road [Ordinance Introduction; Resolution]

Page 7 ends

Attachments:

1. Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 13, 2026

2. Planning Commission Minutes dated August 13, 2026
Prepared by: Pilar Plummer, Associate Planner
Submitted by: Allison DeBusk, Community Development Director Approved by: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator

III

PLANNING COMMISSION

STAFF REPORT
REPORT DATE: August 5, 2026
AGENDA DATE: August 13, 2026
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1 Hot Springs Road (PLN2024-00217)
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Division
Megan Arciniega, Senior Planner
Pilar Plummer, Associate Planner
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Request for a Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCP Amendment), to change the zone of APNs: 017-393-002 & -003) from R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/ Coastal Overlay) and to change the coastal land use designation from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac).

Associated with the amendments is a proposal for a new multi-unit residential development comprised of 22 units under the variable density provisions of Title 28. The development consists of two- and three-story townhouses within seven individual buildings. The unit mix includes 5 studios, 5 two-bedroom units, and 12 three-bedroom units with an average unit size of 1,421 square feet at 11 du/acre. Two units (10%) would be restricted to lower-income households. The project includes 50 parking spaces, comprised of 39 spaces within private garages, 1 uncovered parking space to serve a studio unit, and 10 uncovered guest parking spaces. New hardscape and landscape improvements are proposed throughout the site. See Exhibits A and B for project plans and applicant letter, respectively.

If the Local Coastal Program Amendments are granted by the City Council, the project would return to the Planning Commission later for the following actions:

A. A Modification to allow encroachments into the required front and interior setbacks (SBMC §28.92.110 and 28.21.060); and
B. A Coastal Development Permit to allow the proposed development in the NonAppealable Jurisdiction of the City’s Coastal Zone (SBMC §28.44.060).

II. REQUIRED ACTIONS
Planning Commission action on the following is requested:

A. A Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program; Additionally, Planning Commission recommendation to City Council is required for the following:

Item III Page 1 of 39 ATTACHMENT 1

Planning Commission Staff Report
1 Hot Springs Road (PLN2024-00317)
Report Date: August 5, 2026

Page 2 ends

B. A Local Coastal Program Amendment for a Zoning Map Amendment to change the zone from R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/ Coastal Overlay) Zone.

C. A Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the coastal land use designation from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac).

III. RECOMMENDATION
If approved as proposed, the project would conform to the City’s Zoning and Building Ordinances and policies of the Coastal Land Use Plan. Staff requests that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Local Coastal Program Amendments to the City Council.

Project Site
Vicinity Map of 1 Hot Springs Road (outlined in yellow) Item III Page 2 of 39

Planning Commission Staff Report
1 Hot Springs Road (PLN2024-00317)
Report Date: August 5, 2026

Page 3 ends

IV. BACKGROUND
Project Site and Lot Area
The 2.4-acre site is bounded on the south by Channel Drive, on the west by East Cabrillo Boulevard, and by the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) on the north side of the lot. The site is vacant with exception of a cellular tower at the northeastern portion of the lot that is proposed to remain, and the Charles Caldwell Watering Trough and Fountain at the corner of East Cabrillo Boulevard and Channel Drive. Constructed in 1911-1912, the fountain is a City Landmark. As part of the Cabrillo Boulevard / Underpass Replacement Project to widen East. Cabrillo Boulevard, the City is anticipated to acquire ≤ 0.5 acres from the western portion of the project site, however this has not been completed at this time. The project site also includes APN 017- 393-003, a 0.11-acre parcel. In 2025, the City and Santa Barbara Cemetery Association completed a land swap such that now the Cemetery is the sole owner of APN 017-393-003 and the City owns a small area encompassing the watering trough and fountain. The fountain is anticipated to be repaired by the City as part of the Cabrillo Boulevard project.

Preliminary Housing Development Application
On November 27, 2023, the applicant submitted a Preliminary Housing Development (SB-330) application, allowing the developer to seek vesting rights for the proposed development. The SB330 application was submitted prior to certification of the City’s Housing Element as a Builder’s Remedy project which required 20% of the total units to be allocated to low-income households.

The City reviewed the Pre-Application Review Team (PRT) application and provided comment on April 23, 2024, indicating potential support for multi-unit residential development on the otherwise historically vacant lot because the land use and zone change would be more consistent with residential uses on Los Patos Way and Coast Village Road.

Formal Application
The City accepted the Planning Application for the proposed development on June 12, 2024.

Item III Page 3 of 39

Planning Commission Staff Report
1 Hot Springs Road (PLN2024-00317)
Report Date: August 5, 2026

Page 4 ends

The Planning Commission conceptually reviewed the project including the request for initiation of Local Coastal Program Amendments on August 15, 2024. At the public hearing the Commission initiated the zone change from R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/Coastal Overlay), and the change from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/acre) with the comment that the project site is suitable for a multi-unit housing project and that the residential density is appropriate (Exhibit D – PC Minutes).

On March 25, 2025, the City deemed the project complete and subsequently on April 18, 2025, provided a Consistency Review Letter clarifying the project’s consistency based on the proposed zoning and coastal land use designations. It was determined that the project would be consistent with all requirements for the R-3 zone and with the land use designation of Medium Density Residential (12 du/acre).

In addition to this determination, the City noted that the project did not qualify for a Categorical Exemption under CEQA Guidelines due to the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendments, and an Initial Study would be required to determine the appropriate level of environmental review. As discussed in Section VIII of this report, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was subsequently prepared. The public review period for the Draft MND was completed on June 15, 2026.

Since the project was deemed complete in 2025, the applicant revised the proposal from Builder’s Remedy project to a housing development processed solely under the variable density provisions of Title 28. Pursuant to SBMC §28.43.040, rental housing projects are exempt from the City’s inclusionary requirements. However, the applicant is proposing 10% (2 units) to be allocated to low-income households (Exhibit B - Applicant Letter). Additionally, the applicant has requested to postpone consideration of the Coastal Development Permit and Modification to a later hearing date to accommodate potential adjustments to site planning.

Provided the Local Coastal Program Amendments are granted, the project will return to the Planning Commission for the Coastal Development Permit and Modification.

V. SITE INFORMATION AND PROJECT STATISTICS
A. SITE INFORMATION
Applicant: Brian Holland, 1 HSR GP, LLC
Property Owner: Santa Barbara Cemetery Association
Site Information
Parcel Number: 017-393-002 & -003 Lot Area: 2.4 acres (~88,524 s.f.) Coastal Plan: Parks/Open Space Zoning: R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay)
Existing Use: Cellular Site Topography: 10%
Item III Page 4 of 39

Planning Commission Staff Report
1 Hot Springs Road (PLN2024-00317)
Report Date: August 5, 2026

Page 5 ends

Adjacent Zoning and Land Uses
North: P-R/SD-3 Railroad; Highway 101
East: County Public Right-of-Way (Channel Dr.); Railroad South: County Public Right-of-Way (Channel Dr.); Cemetery West: HRC-2/P-R/SD-3 Public Right-of-Way (E. Cabrillo Blvd); Commercial; Andree Clark Bird Refuge
VI. MUNICIPAL CODE CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
A. ZONING STATISTICS
Standard Requirement/ Allowance Proposed
Setbacks
-Front
-Interior
-Rear
Front: 10’-0” (1 to 2-story
building); 20’-0” (portion that is
3-stories)
Interior: 6’-0” (1 to 2-story
building); 10’-0” (portion that is
3-stories)
Rear: 6’-0” (1 story building);
10’-0” (portion that is 2 to 3-
stories)
Varies (see project plans)*
Building Height 3 stories, 45 feet Varies; max height is 3 stories, 39’-2”
Parking
-Vehicle
-Bicycle
40 residential; 10 guest spaces
0 spaces
40 residential; 10 guest spaces
Bicycle parking to be located
within the private garages.

Lot Area Required
for Each Unit
(Variable Density)
Studio: 1 unit per 1,600 s.f. of lot
area
1-bed: 1 unit per 1,840 s.f. of lot
area
2-bed: 1 unit per 2,320 s.f. of lot
area
3-bed: 1 unit per 2,800 s.f. of lot
area
Project satisfies the requirement
based on 88,524 s.f. of lot area
Density 12 units/acre 11 units/acre
Average Unit Size N/A 1,421 s.f.

Common Open Yard 10% of net lot area = 8,852 s.f. 35,254 s.f.

Private Open Yard
Studio: 100 s.f. or 60 s.f.
2-bed: 140 s.f. or 84 s.f.
3-bed: 160 s.f. or 96 s.f.

Project satisfies the requirement
on either first floor or
second/third floors
Item III Page 5 of 39

Planning Commission Staff Report
1 Hot Springs Road (PLN2024-00317)
Report Date: August 5, 2026

Page 6 ends

Lot Coverage
-Building
-Paving/Driveway
-Landscaping
N/A
N/A
N/A
23,770 s.f.
29,500 s.f.
35,254 s.f.
27%
33%
40%
*Modification requested
B. ZONING ORDINANCE CONSISTENCY
i. REZONE
A rezone is a legislative process, and City procedures require Planning Commission initiation before the applicant can submit a formal application for the rezone. As discussed, on August 15, 2024, the Planning Commission conducted an initiation hearing and voted to initiate the rezone and coastal plan land use designation change.

The project site is zoned R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay), which allows for single-unit residential development (one unit per lot), as well as other types of residential uses. As designed, the project exceeds allowable density for the R-1/SD3 zoning district at 22 units. It is important to note that the current R-1/SD-3 zoning designation is inconsistent with the Parks/Open Space designation in the Coastal Land Use Plan which is intended to protect and preserve park, beach, and open space.

Residential uses under this designation are not allowed. This project site was not included in the Housing Element’s suitable sites inventory for residential development due to its current zoning and land use designation.

The applicant is requesting the project site to be rezoned to R-3/SD-3 which allows multi-unit residential development as outlined in SBMC Chapter 28.21 (Exhibit C – R-3 Zone). The project under this zoning designation would be consistent with the variable density provisions of Title 28 based on the unit mix of 5 studios, 5 2- bedroom, and 12 3-bedroom units, which results in a lot area requirement of 53,200 (net). At 2.4-acres (~88,524 s.f.) the project site satisfies the minimum lot area requirement for the proposed density.

VII. POLICY CONSISTENCY
Coastal Land Use Designation Change. As discussed, the current Parks/Open Space designation in the Coastal Land Use Plan is inconsistent with the proposal for residential development and with the existing zoning designation of R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay).

Therefore, the project includes the request to change the designation to Medium Density (12 du/acre) to be aligned with the proposed zoning designation of R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/ Coastal Overlay) Zone to allow for the proposed density.

The project site is located within the Non-Appealable Jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and must be found consistent with the California Coastal Act and the City’s Local Coastal Program which implements the California Coastal Act.

A complete list of policies that apply to the project is attached as Exhibit F.

Item III Page 6 of 39

Planning Commission Staff Report
1 Hot Springs Road (PLN2024-00317)
Report Date: August 5, 2026

Page 7 ends

East Beach Component Area
East Beach Component Area. The project site is in the East Beach Component Area of the Coastal Land Use Plan. This 244-acre Component Area is eclectic, with a mix of local- and visitorserving uses. The project site has a coastal land use designation of Parks/Open Space (green area on the figure shown above). The symbol “II” across from the project site denotes Hotel & Related Commerce II/Medium High Residential (Max 27 du/acre).

Land Use. Over half of the land use is Parks/Open Space that includes Chase Palm Park, several other parks, the Santa Barbara Zoo, and the Andrée Clark Bird Refuge. The remainder of this Component Area is a mix of hotels, motels, apartments, condominiums, and general commercial.

Development Potential. Development potential of new residential units is limited as only one vacant property exists in this area (the project site), and nearly all other residential properties are developed to their potential density. There may be some limited potential for expansion of nonresidential development.

Major Coastal Issues. The major coastal issues in this component area involve flooding along Sycamore Creek, erosion and coastal flooding with sea level rise in low-lying areas, erosion of coastal bluffs, and tidal influence and creek inflows for the Andrée Clark Bird Refuge. No specific coastal issues have been identified for the project site.

Coastal Act and Coastal Land Use Plan Consistency.

A. LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
The project would be consistent with coastal policies related to housing, specifically LUP Policy 2.1-1 (Increased Densities for Affordable Housing) by providing two inclusionary units. The project would be consistent with LUP Policy 2.1-15 (Maintenance and Enhancement of Public Access) as the proposed project would not inhibit public access to the coast, as well as Coastal Act Policy 30250 and LUP Policy 2.1-16 (Siting of New Development) by providing new residential development in proximity to adequate public services where it will not have significant effects, either individually or cumulatively, on coastal resources.

B. SCENIC RESOURCES & VISUAL QUALITY
California Coastal Act Policy 30251 and 30253 and Coastal LUP Policies require that projects be sited and designed to avoid impacts to scenic resources and public scenic views. Scenic Resources inside of the Coastal Zone of the City that are relevant to the project include, but are not limited to, the ocean, and Andree Clark Bird Refuge. The Item III Page 7 of 39

Planning Commission Staff Report
1 Hot Springs Road (PLN2024-00317)
Report Date: August 5, 2026

Page 8 ends

project does not have the potential to obstruct or impact scenic views of the ocean and coastal areas due to its location facing the cemetery and abutting the UPRR. The HLC has also provided generally positive review of the design in terms of size, bulk, and scale, and neighborhood compatibility.

VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines an Initial Study was prepared for the project. The Initial Study concluded that, with implementation of the identified mitigation measures, the project would not result in any significant environmental impacts. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was subsequently prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15070. The Draft MND was circulated for public review in accordance with CEQA requirements. A notice of the Draft MND’s document availability, 30-day public comment period (May 15 to June 15, 2026) was mailed to surrounding property owners, interested parties, organizations, and agencies, and was also provided via newspaper notice. The Draft MND was also submitted to the State Clearinghouse for review by State agencies and published to the City’s website online. No public comment on the Draft MND was received during this period.

Environmental factors that were identified as potentially affected by the project include biological resources, noise, cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials. To address these the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program includes mitigation measures which will be applied as part of conditions of approval when Planning Commission reviews the Coastal Development Permit.

The proposed mitigation measures have been incorporated into a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), which will ensure implementation of the required measures. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project (Exhibit G – Final Mitigated Negative Declaration).

The Final MND is available on the City’s website at:
https://santabarbaraca.gov/1HotSpringsRoad
IX. DESIGN REVIEW
The project site is in El Pueblo Viejo Landmark District and therefore the site development is under the jurisdiction of the Historic Landmarks Commission. While the residential development was reviewed by the HLC (meeting minutes are attached as Exhibit E), the requested LCP Amendments before the Planning Commission does not require design review.

X. NEXT STEPS
Provided the Planning Commission recommends the zone and coastal land use designation change to City Council, the following steps will apply:

1. City Council review of Local Coastal Program Amendments

2. Coastal Commission review of Local Coastal Program Amendments Item III Page 8 of 39

Planning Commission Staff Report
1 Hot Springs Road (PLN2024-00317)
Report Date: August 5, 2026

Page 9 ends

3. Planning Commission review of Setback Modification and Coastal Development Permit

4. Historic Landmarks Commission Project Design Approval and Final Approval

5. Building and Public Works Permits
XI. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS
Staff recommends the Planning Commission make the following findings:

A. FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADOPTION (CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE §21080 AND SBMC §22.100.160.C)

1. The Planning Commission adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program and finds:
a. The Final Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act requirements and constitutes adequate environmental analysis of the project.
b. On the basis of the whole administrative record, including the Initial Study, Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, and any comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The applicant has agreed to the mitigation measures identified. c. Revisions to the project and the incorporation of mitigation measures will avoid or reduce all potentially significant impacts to a less-than- significant level. d. The Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Santa Barbara.
e. The custodian of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based is the Community Development Department located at 630 Garden Street, Santa Barbara, California 93101.
f. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15074 and Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. and is included in the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project and is hereby adopted.

B. RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT FOR ZONING MAP TO CITY COUNCIL (SBMC §28.92.050)

1. The Zoning Map Amendment to change the zone from R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/ Coastal Overlay) Zone is appropriate based on the proposed density of 11 du/acre allowing 20 market rate and 2 low-income units on a vacant lot in proximity to coastal resources in the city. Therefore, the Planning Commission recommends said amendment for approval to the City Council.

Item III Page 9 of 39

Planning Commission Staff Report
1 Hot Springs Road (PLN2024-00317)
Report Date: August 5, 2026

Page 10 ends

C. RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT TO CITY COUNCIL (PRC 30514(A))

1. The Local Costal Program Amendment to change the coastal land use designation from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac) is appropriate based on the proposed density and because the proposed land use designation allows for residential development that would be consistent with residential uses on Los Patos Way and Coast Village Road. Therefore, the Planning Commission recommends said amendment for approval to the City Council.

EXHIBITS
A. Project Plans
B. Applicant's Letter dated August 3, 2026
C. R-3 Zone
D. PC Minutes dated August 15, 2024
E. HLC Minutes dated September 25, 2024
F. Applicable Coastal Act & Coastal Land Use Plan Policies G. Final Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (link provided) Contact/Case Planner: Pilar Plummer, Associate Planner
([email protected])
630 Garden Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Phone: (805) 564-5470 x 4551
Item III Page 10 of 39

City of Santa Barbara
California
Exhibit A: Project Plans dated for the August 13, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting, are available electronically for view online at: SantaBarbaraCA.gov/PC and will be transferred the city’s Archived Agendas & Documents system after the hearing.

EXHIBIT A
Item III Page 11 of 39

VIA EMAIL
August 3, 2026
Planning Commission
City of Santa Barbara
630 Garden Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
RE: Applicant Letter
Proposed Multifamily Development at 1 Hot Springs Road
PLN 2024-00217
Dear Staff and Commissioners:
1 HSR GP, LLC (“Applicant”) is pleased to provide the following applicant letter and enclosed supporting plans, documents and reports for the proposed construction of a low-density, 22-unit multifamily project (“Project”) located at 1 Hot Springs Road in Santa Barbara, within the R-1/SD-3 zone district. The project requires (i) amendments to the Local Coastal Program (“LCP”) and Zoning Map, (ii) approval of a setback modification, (iii) design review approved by the Historic Landmarks Commission (“HLC”), and (iv) approval of a Coastal Development Permit.

1. Property Overview & History.
a. 1 Hot Springs Road (the “Property”) is a ~2.4-acre vacant land site abutting Channel Drive to the south, Cabrillo Boulevard to the west, and Highway 101 to the north. The Property is located within the Coastal Zone and the El Pueblo Viejo Historic District.
b. The Property is owned by the Santa Barbara Cemetery Association, Inc. (“Cemetery”), and is currently zoned R-1 under the City’s General Plan, and designated Parks/Open Space under the LCP. The Property has been privately owned by the Cemetery for over 120 years and has never 1 EXHIBIT B
Item III Page 12 of 39

been used as a park, public open space, or for any recreational activity.

From the early 1900s until the 1980s, at least two (2) private residences were situated on the Property, which were used to house Cemetery staff. c. The Property was not included in the City’s Housing Element. Applicant sought to include it, but the City had already submitted its draft to the Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”). However, one of HCD’s comments to the City was that it failed to identify enough vacant land parcels in its Housing Element. As explained above, the Property is vacant and ideally situated for multifamily housing.

2. Planned Public Infrastructure Project, the City’s Acquisition of a Portion of the Property, and Completed Land Swap
a. The Los Patos Roundabout Project.

1. Phase 1: This includes the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Cabrillo Boulevard and Los Patos Way and pedestrian and bicycle improvements, which was completed in 2025. This phase will not directly impact the Project.

2. Phase 2: This includes the widening of Cabrillo Boulevard and the construction of a retaining wall alongside the west side of the Remainder Property (defined below) as part of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) bridge replacement and expansion efforts.

Applicant’s understanding is that this phase will not commence until at least 2028, when Caltrans completes Phase 4E of the Highway 101 widening project.
b. The City’s Acquisition of a Portion of the Property. In order to facilitate the above-referenced public infrastructure project (specifically, the widening of Cabrillo Boulevard), the City and Cemetery anticipate negotiating a land acquisition whereby the City will acquire up to one-half (½) acre from the western portion of the Property. The proposed Project accounts for the Property’s reduced land area following the City’s acquisition. c. Completed Land Swap. In 2025, the City and Cemetery completed a land swap of APN 017-393-003 and APN 017-393-002. The City now owns the small parcel encompassing the existing historic water trough on the southwest corner of the Property (APN 017-393-002), and the Cemetery now owns the triangular parcel along the southern edge of the Property along Channel Drive (APN 017-393-003).
///
2 Item III Page 13 of 39

3. Procedural History.
a. On November 27, 2023, Applicant filed its initial Preliminary Housing Development Application. The application was submitted under the so-called “Builder’s Remedy” pursuant to Government Code § 65589.5 since, at the time, the City was not in compliance with its Housing Element. However, the Project has not been processed as a Builder’s Remedy project since (i) the applicability of Builder’s Remedy to Coastal Zone projects is unsettled, and (ii) the City has accepted the Project pursuant to its variable density provisions as set forth in Title 28 of the Santa Barbara Municipal Code (“SBMC”).
b. On May 24, 2024, Applicant filed its Planning Application. c. On July 10, 2024, the City’s Land Development Team determined that the Planning Application was incomplete and requested additional information.

Applicant subsequently submitted the requested materials, and on March 20, 2025, City staff deemed the Planning Application complete. d. On August 15, 2024, the Planning Commission reviewed the Project and initiated the requisite LCP and Zoning Map Amendments.
e. On May 15, 2026, the City published its Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, which found that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the Project have been made by or agreed to by the Project proponent.
f. Although rental housing projects are exempt from the City’s inclusionary housing requirements under SBMC § 28.43.040, Applicant voluntarily proposes to designate two (2) units as affordable.

4. Project Overview.
a. Design Inspiration. The Project is inspired by the meandering streets of Montecito’s upper village. As such, the “heart” of the Project is a woonerf, a Dutch word that translates to “living street”, which functions as pedestrian common space, and a means of ingress/egress for bicycles and vehicles. There are 7 separate structures with 22 total units, including 5 studios, 5 two-bedroom units, and 12 three-bedroom units. The average unit size is 1,420 square feet, and the gross building area is 31,258 square feet.

The design is in keeping with the Spanish Colonial Revival style, with reference to the nearby George Washington Smith building at the Cemetery, and other historic structures within the El Pueblo Viejo Historic 3 EXHIBIT B
Item III Page 14 of 39

District. All of the units have private garages. The Project provides 50 total parking spaces, including 39 dedicated spaces within private garages, 10 uncovered guest parking spaces, and 1 uncovered parking space to serve a studio unit.
b. Affordability. 10% of the units (10% x 22 = 2.2) will be designated as affordable.

5. Specific Actions Requested from the Planning Commission. a. Recommend City Council Approval of Local Coastal Program / Zoning Map Amendments. Applicant requests that the Planning Commission recommend that City Council approve the draft amendments to the LCP and Zoning Map, changing (i) the City land use designation from R-1/SD-3 (One Family Residence / Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence / Coastal Overlay), and (ii) the Coastal land use designation from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/acre).
b. Approve Proposed Setback Modifications. The proposed project requires a few minor zoning modification requests for front setback encroachments along Channel Drive, Cabrillo Boulevard, and interior setback encroachments to the North to allow architectural layering of massing on the building elevations. The encroachments vary in sizes, ranging from 6” to 18”. Proposed encroachments include:
■ Unit 10: south facade,18” pop-out at 2nd floor and entire trellis at 3rd floor
■ Unit 11: entire north facade at 1st and 2nd floor, depth varies, 2’-2” max.
■ Unit 13: north facade, 6” pop-out at 2nd floor
■ Unit 14: north facade, 6” pop-out at 1st floor, 6” pop-out at 2nd floor ■ Unit 15: north facade, 6” pop-out at 2nd floor
■ Unit 17: north facade, 6” pop-out at 1st floor, 6” pop-out at 2nd floor ■ Unit 18: north facade, 6” pop-out at 1st floor, 6” pop-out at 2nd floor ■ Unit 19: north facade, 6” pop-out at 1st floor, 6” pop-out at 2nd floor nd ■ Unit 20: north facade, 6” pop-out at 2 floor

6. Supplemental Materials. The following supplemental materials were provided in conjunction with Applicant’s Planning Application:
a. Architectural plans
b. Landscape plans
c. Preliminary grading and drainage plans
d. Preliminary title report
e. Photographs
4 Item III Page 15 of 39

The Project would convert a long-vacant, privately owned site into 22 new homes, including 2 affordable units, while responding to the site’s historic context and unique physical constraints. As described in this letter and the supporting application materials, the Project has been designed to minimize impacts and to contribute meaningfully to Santa Barbara’s housing supply. Applicant respectfully requests that the Planning Commission take the actions identified in Section 5.

Thank you for reviewing and considering the Project. Please contact the undersigned at (503) 970-4636 should you have any questions.
1 HSR GP, LLC
___________________________
By: Brian Holland
Its: Managing Member
5 Item III Page 16 of 39
7/23/26, 12:33 PM R-3 LIMITED MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE AND R-4 HOTEL-MOTEL-MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE - City of Santa B… City of Santa Barbara, CA
Thursday, July 23, 2026
Title 28. Zoning—Coastal
Chapter 28.21. R-3 LIMITED MULTIPLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE ZONE AND R-4 HOTEL-MOTEL-MULTIPLE

RESIDENCE ZONE
§ 28.21.001. In General.

The following regulations shall apply to both the R-3 Limited Multiple-Family Residence Zone and the R4 Hotel-Motel-Multiple-Residence Zone unless otherwise provided in this title. (Ord. 2585, 1957; Ord. 3710, 1974)
§ 28.21.005. General Description and Legislative Intent.

A. R-3 ZONE. This is a restricted residential district of high density in which the principal use of land is for multiple-family dwellings, together with recreational, religious and educational facilities required to serve the community. The regulations for this district are designed and intended to establish, maintain and protect the essential characteristics of the district, to develop and sustain a suitable environment for family life and to prohibit activities of a commercial nature and those which would tend to be inharmonious with or injurious to the preservation of a residential environment.

B. R-4 ZONE. This is a hotel-motel multiple residence district in which the principal use of land is intended to be for multiple housing, together with recreational, religious and educational facilities required to serve the community. The provisions of this chapter are intended to provide a pleasant and healthful environment by establishing provisions for usable open spaces.

It is the intent of this district to allow hotels and similar establishments, including related recreational, conference center and other auxiliary uses primarily for use by hotel guests, while protecting the existing housing stock, and to preserve the residential character of those neighborhoods which are still primarily residential. In addition, the preservation of buildings of architectural and/or historical significance shall be encouraged. A conversion permit will be required in order to convert existing dwelling units for the purpose of providing hotel or similar uses.

Regulations for this district are designed to control activities of a retail commercial nature and those which would tend to be inharmonious with housing. Restaurants intended to serve the visitors using the established hotels and motels in the immediate vicinity are permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit.
(Ord. 2585, 1957; Ord. 3710, 1974; Ord. 4018 §1, 1979; Ord. 4199, 1983) § 28.21.030. Uses Permitted.

A. R-3 ZONE.

1. Any use permitted in the R-2 Zone and subject to the restrictions and limitations contained therein, except that any use specifically mentioned hereafter shall be subject to the restrictions 1/9
Item III Page 17 of 39
https://ecode360.com/print/SA5006?guid=44110663

EXHIBIT C
7/23/26, 12:33 PM R-3 LIMITED MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE AND R-4 HOTEL-MOTEL-MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE - City of Santa B of the R-3 Zone.

2. One-, two-, and multiple-family dwellings.

3. Community care facilities, residential care facilities for the elderly and hospices serving 7 to 12 individuals subject to the provisions in Chapter 28.93.

B. R-4 ZONE.

1. Any use permitted in the R-3 Zone and subject to the restrictions and limitations contained therein, except that any such use specifically mentioned hereafter shall be subject to the restrictions of the R-4 Zone.

2. Hotels and related recreational, conference center and other auxiliary uses primarily for use by hotel guests. Any hotels, when units are designed or constructed with cooking facilities shall, as to such units, be subject to the lot area per unit requirements of the R-4 Zone and to the parking requirements for multiple family units required in Section 28.90.100.G.3 of this title.

Such hotels when designed, constructed or used for either 24 or more dwelling units, or 50 guest rooms or more may include a business, except a restaurant, conducted therein for the convenience of the occupants and their guests; provided entrance to such places of business be from the inside of such buildings; that the floor area used for all the businesses in the facility shall not exceed 30% of the total ground floor area of all the buildings comprising the hotel which are on a single lot or contiguous lots; and provided further that no street frontage of any such building shall be used for such business. Any hotel, regardless of the number of units or rooms therein, may include a restaurant for use by the hotel occupants and their guests only, provided that such facility conforms to all other requirements imposed on any "business" by this paragraph. A restaurant not conforming to all other requirements imposed on any "business" by this paragraph or not for use solely by hotel occupants and their guests may be established only if a conditional use permit is obtained for operation of a restaurant under Chapter 28.94 of this code.
(Ord. 2585, 1957; Ord. 3710, 1974; Ord. 4199, 1983; Ord. 4858, 1994) § 28.21.035. Uses Permitted Upon the Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit or Performance Standard Permit.

As provided in Chapters 28.93 and 28.94 of this title.
(Ord. 2585, 1957; Ord. 3710, 1974; Ord. 5380, 2005)
§ 28.21.050. Building Height.

Three stories, which three stories combined shall not exceed (i) 45 feet nor (ii) exceed the height limitations imposed for the protection and enhancement of solar access by Chapter 28.11 of this code. (Ord. 2585, 1957; Ord. 3710, 1974; Ord. 4426, 1986)
§ 28.21.060. Setbacks.

The following setbacks shall be observed on all lots within these zones:

A. Front Setback. A front setback of not less than the indicated distance shall be provided between the front lot line and all buildings, structures, and parking on the lot, as follows:

1. One or two story building or structure: 10 feet

2. Three story building or structure: 15 feet; however, if the net floor area of the third floor is less than 50% of the net floor area of the first floor building footprint, the front setback shall be …
2/9
Item III Page 18 of 39
https://ecode360.com/print/SA5006?guid=44110663
7/23/26, 12:33 PM R-3 LIMITED MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE AND R-4 HOTEL-MOTEL-MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE - City of Santa B… reduced as follows:
a. Ground floor portions: 10 feet
b. Second story portions: 10 feet
c. Third story portions: 20 feet

3. Parking that does not back out onto the street: 10 feet

4. Parking that backs out onto the street: 20 feet
B. Interior Setback. An interior setback of not less than the indicated distance shall be provided between the interior lot line and all buildings, structures, and parking on the lot as follows:

1. One or two story building or structure: 6 feet

2. Three story building or structure: 10 feet; however, if the net floor area of the third floor is less than 50% of the net floor area of the first floor building footprint, the interior setback shall be reduced as follows:
a. Ground floor portions: six feet
b. Second story portions: six feet
c. Third story portions: 10 feet

3. Garage, carport or uncovered parking: six feet; however, if the width of the lot is less than 55 feet at the opening of a garage or carport, the garage or carport opening does not face the street, and the interior depth of the garage or carport does not exceed 20 feet, the setback may be reduced by up to 3 feet by the design review body that reviews the project.

C. Rear Setback. A rear setback of not less than the indicated distance shall be provided between the rear lot line and all buildings, structures, and parking on the lot:

1. Ground floor portions: 6 feet

2. Second story portions: 10 feet

3. Third story portions: 10 feet

4. Garage, carport, or uncovered parking: 3 feet
For purposes of this section, a rear setback shall be provided from the lot line opposite to the front lot line. In the event of two or more front lot lines, the rear setback shall be provided from the lot line opposite to any of the front lot lines.
(Ord. 5459, 2008)
§ 28.21.065. Reduction of Setback Requirements.

It is hereby declared that under the following conditions a physical hardship exists on all R-3 and R-4 Zone lots, and that the listed modifications are hereby granted where the stated conditions exist. Other provisions of this title notwithstanding, a conforming addition may be made to an existing nonconforming dwelling where such nonconformance is due to inadequate front setback or interior setbacks, providing said dwelling complied with the setbacks required by ordinance at the time of construction. (Ord. 3587, 1973; Ord. 3710, 1974; Ord. 5459, 2008)
§ 28.21.070. Distance Between Buildings on the Same Lot.

Item III Page 19 of 39
https://ecode360.com/print/SA5006?guid=44110663
7/23/26, 12:33 PM R-3 LIMITED MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE AND R-4 HOTEL-MOTEL-MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE - City of Santa B… No main building shall be closer than 15 feet to any other main building on the same lot, except that a one-story building shall be no closer than 10 feet to another one-story building. (Ord. 2585, 1957; Ord. 3710, 1974)
§ 28.21.080. Lot Area and Frontage Requirements.

A. Minimum Lot Size and Frontage for New Lots. Every lot hereafter created in an R-3 and R-4 Zone shall contain at least 14,000 square feet and 60 feet of frontage on a public street.

B. Lots Less Than 5,000 Square Feet. Existing lots of less than 5,000 square feet of net lot area may be used as a building site for a one-family dwelling, provided that all other regulations of the zone prescribed by this title are observed.

C. Existing Lots of 5,000 to 6,999 Square Feet. Existing lots of 5,000 to 6,999 square feet of net lot area, inclusive, may be used as a building site for two dwelling units, provided that all other regulations of the zone prescribed by this title are observed.

D. Lots of 7,000 to 13,999 Square Feet. Existing lots of 7,000 to 13,999 square feet of net lot area, inclusive, may be used as a building site for three units, provided that all other regulations of the zone prescribed by this title are observed.

E. Lots of 14,000 Square Feet or More. For lots of 14,000 square feet or more of net lot area, a minimum of 3,500 square feet of net lot area shall be provided for each dwelling unit hereafter erected.

F. Variable Density in Certain Zones. Lots in the R-3, R-4, C-1, C-2, C-M and R-O Zones, as well as lots in the HRC-2 and OC Zones where residential uses are allowed by the Local Coastal Plan, may be used as a building site for more units than permitted in subsections B, C, D and E above if the number of bedrooms in the dwelling unit is limited in accord with the following:

1. Studio unit - one unit per 1,600 square feet of lot area;

2. One-bedroom unit - one unit per 1,840 square feet of lot area;

3. Two-bedroom unit - one unit per 2,320 square feet of lot area;

4. Three or more bedroom unit - one unit per 2,800 square feet of lot area.

Existing lots with less than 5,000 square feet of net lot area shall not be used as a building site under this subsection F for more than two dwelling units. This subsection F shall be applicable in the R-3, R-4, C-1, C 2, C-M, R-O, HRC-2 and OC Zones and not in any other zone. The fact that a lot may be subject to an overlay zone, including, but not limited to, the S-D-2 or S-D-3 Overlay Zones, does not prohibit the application of variable density if variable density is otherwise allowed in the base zoning of the lot.
(Ord. 2585, 1957; Ord. 3753, 1975; Ord. 3710, 1974; Ord. 3950 §1, 1978; Ord. 4772, 1992; Ord. 5343, 2005; Ord. 5459, 2008)
§ 28.21.081. Outdoor Living Space.

Every lot in this zone shall provide outdoor living space in accordance with either of the following methods:

A. Private Outdoor Living Space Method. Lots providing outdoor living space in accordance with this method shall provide each of the spaces described in paragraphs 1 through 3 below:

1. Private Outdoor Living Space. Private outdoor living space shall be provided for each dwelling unit as follows:
https://ecode360.com/print/SA5006?guid=44110663
Item III Page 20 of 39
7/23/26, 12:33 PM R-3 LIMITED MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE AND R-4 HOTEL-MOTEL-MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE - City of Santa B… a. Minimum size. The private outdoor living space shall be not less than the size specified below based on the number of bedrooms in the dwelling unit and the location where the private outdoor living space is provided:
i. Ground floor:
(A) Studio unit - 100 square feet
(B) 1 Bedroom unit - 120 square feet
(C) 2 Bedroom unit - 140 square feet
(D) 3 or more Bedroom unit - 160 square feet
ii. Second or higher story:
(A) Studio unit - 60 square feet
(B) 1 Bedroom unit - 72 square feet
(C) 2 Bedroom unit - 84 square feet
(D) 3 or more Bedroom unit - 96 square feet
b. Minimum Dimensions. The private outdoor living space shall have minimum dimensions as specified below, measured in perpendicular directions based on the location where the private outdoor living space is provided:
i. Ground floor: 10 feet
ii. Second or higher story: 6 feet
c. Connectivity. Private outdoor living space shall be contiguous to and accessible from the dwelling unit for which it is provided.
d. Multi-Story Dwelling Units. Dwelling units that occupy more than one story may provide the required private outdoor living space on any story. e. Allowed Amenities. Private outdoor living space may include planter areas totaling no more than 50 square feet, patio areas, balconies, and decks. f. Exclusions. Private outdoor living space shall not include stairs, entrance decks, or landings. In addition, private outdoor living space shall not include areas located under eaves, balconies, or other cantilevered architectural or building projections not providing additional floor area where the vertical clearance under the architectural or building projection is less than seven feet.
g. Allowed Setback Encroachments. Private outdoor living space may encroach into setbacks as follows:
i. Private outdoor living space provided on grade may encroach into interior and rear setbacks up to the property line.
ii. Private outdoor living space provided on grade may be located up to 10 feet from the front lot line, subject to the following conditions:
(A) The area of the private outdoor living space located in the front yard may not exceed more than 50% of the front yard area, excluding driveways. (B) The private outdoor living space provided in the front yard shall be enclosed by a solid fence having a minimum height of five feet and a maximum height of six feet. The exterior of the fence shall be landscaped. However, the design review body that reviews the project may reduce or waive the requirement for a fence or https://ecode360.com/print/SA5006?guid=44110663
Item III Page 21 of 39
7/23/26, 12:33 PM R-3 LIMITED MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE AND R-4 HOTEL-MOTEL-MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE - City of Santa landscaping in order to preserve substantial views from the unit being served by the private outdoor living space or if the area does not abut a street.

2. Open Space. In addition to all setbacks, every lot satisfying the outdoor living space requirement in accordance with this private outdoor living space method shall provide on grade open space of an area not less than 10% of the net lot area in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph. The intent of this provision is to provide relief from building volume, driveways and parking beyond that afforded by setbacks. a. Examples of Permitted Open Space Improvements. The required open space may consist of landscaped or hardscaped areas unobstructed from the ground upwards, including, but not limited to:
i. Walks,
ii. Patios,
iii. Planted areas,
iv. Decks no more than 18 inches above grade at all points, and v. Swimming pool areas.
b. Examples of Open Space Improvements Not Permitted. The required open space shall not consist of the following:
i. Garages,
ii. Carports,
iii. Driveways,
iv. Loading areas,
v. Parking and turnaround areas,
vi. Balconies,
vii. Porches,
viii. Decks higher than 18 inches above grade at any point, ix. Roof decks, or
x. Areas located under trellises, arbors, eaves, balconies, bay windows, window seats, or other cantilevered architectural or building projections not providing additional floor area where the vertical clearance under the structure or architectural or building projection is less than seven feet.

3. Common Open Area. The common open area requirement specified in this paragraph shall only apply to lots developed with four or more dwelling units. Every lot satisfying the outdoor living space requirement in accordance with this private outdoor living space method shall provide a common open area in accordance with this paragraph 3. The common open area shall have a minimum dimension of 15 feet measured in perpendicular directions and shall be accessible to all dwelling units on the lot. The common open area may be located on grade, on the second or higher story, or on a roof deck. On grade common open area may include portions of the interior setback or rear setback. On grade common open area may include portions of any remaining front yard, but shall not include any portion of the front setback. The common open area required in this paragraph 3 may be counted as part of the open space required in paragraph 2 above as long as the other conditions of paragraph 2 are satisfied.

B. Common Outdoor Living Space Method. Lots providing outdoor living space in accordance with this method shall provide common outdoor living space in accordance with the following:

B…
https://ecode360.com/print/SA5006?guid=44110663
Item III Page 22 of 39
7/23/26, 12:33 PM R-3 LIMITED MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE AND R-4 HOTEL-MOTEL-MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE - City of Santa B…

1. Accessibility. The common outdoor living space shall be accessible to all dwelling units on the lot.

2. Minimum Size. The common outdoor living space shall consist of at least 15% of the net lot area.

3. Minimum Dimensions. The common outdoor living space may be provided in multiple locations on the lot, but at least one location shall have a minimum dimension of 20 feet measured in perpendicular directions.

4. Location. Common outdoor living space must be located on grade. On grade common outdoor living space may be located in an interior setback or rear setback. On grade common outdoor living space may be located in the remaining front yard but shall not include any portion of the front setback.

5. Exclusions. Common outdoor living space shall not include any of the following areas:
a. Areas designed for use by motor vehicles, including, but not limited to, driveways, parking, and turnaround areas.
b. Areas located under trellises, arbors, eaves, balconies, bay windows, window seats, or other architectural or building projections not providing additional floor area where the vertical clearance under the structure or architectural or building projection is less than seven feet.
(Ord. 5459, 2008; Ord. 5630, 2013)
§ 28.21.085. Regulations for Non-Residential Buildings, Structures and Uses.

A. Setbacks. Setbacks for all buildings and structures used for nonresidential purposes shall be double the setback requirements for a dwelling as required for the zone in which such building or structure is located. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following shall be exempt from the double setback requirement:

1. Conversions of existing residential structures to structures that contain nonresidential uses specifically allowed in Section 28.21.030.B.2, and

2. Remodels of existing buildings that contain nonresidential uses specifically allowed in Section

28.21.030.B.2.

B. Lot coverage. Not more than 25% of the net area of a lot may be covered by buildings used for nonresidential purposes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following shall be exempt from the lot coverage limitation:

1. Conversions of existing residential structures to structures that contain nonresidential uses specifically allowed in Section 28.21.030.B.2, and

2. Remodels of existing buildings that contain nonresidential uses specifically allowed in Section

28.21.030.B.2.

C. Architectural approval. All buildings used for nonresidential purposes shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural Board of Review, or the Historic Landmarks Commission if the property is located within El Pueblo Viejo Landmark District or another landmark district or if the structure is a designated City Landmark.
(Ord. 2585, 1957; Ord. 3710, 1974; Ord. 4851, 1994; Ord. 4946, 1996; Ord. 5459, 2008) § 28.21.090. Other Requirements.
https://ecode360.com/print/SA5006?guid=44110663
Item III Page 23 of 39
7/23/26, 12:33 PM R-3 LIMITED MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE AND R-4 HOTEL-MOTEL-MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE - City of Santa B… The City Council may impose other requirements as may be deemed necessary to preserve the residential character of the neighborhood including the mailing of notices to property owners and the holding of a public hearing.
(Ord. 2585, 1957; Ord. 3710, 1974)
§ 28.21.100. Off-Street Parking.

Off-street parking shall be provided as required in Chapter 28.90 of this title. (Ord. 2585, 1957; Ord. 3710, 1974)
§ 28.21.110. Signs.

Signs shall be permitted in these zones only as prescribed in the Sign Ordinance of the City of Santa Barbara.
(Ord. 2585, 1957; Ord. 3710, 1974)
§ 28.21.120. Public Street Requirements.

A. When any person proposes to construct one or more multiple-family dwellings, wherein the number of dwelling units is controlled by Section 28.20.060, on a lot or combination of lots, the size, shape, dimensions or topography of which, in relation to existing abutting public streets, require that there be an adequate access or internal circulation roadway for vehicular traffic, including, but not limited to, emergency vehicles and equipment traffic, the City's Chief Building Official may, prior and as a condition to the issuance of a building permit for such dwelling or dwellings, require the submission by the owner or applicant of a plot plan of such lot or combination of lots showing the location of all existing buildings and all buildings proposed to be constructed thereon and showing the location, width, and extent of improvements of an adequate access or internal circulation roadway thereon designed to connect with the abutting public street or streets.

The term adequate access or internal circulation roadway shall mean a dedicated public street established and improved to City standards and so located as to provide convenient and orderly traffic movement, ingress and egress and circulation upon, through and within the lot or combination of lots in relation to abutting streets, the multiple-family dwelling or dwellings, and the off-street parking areas required in connection with such dwelling or dwellings.

The plot plan and adequate access or internal circulation roadway shall be required by the Chief Building Official where:

1. The lot or combination of lots which is the site of the proposed construction exceeds five acres; or

2. The maximum possible number of dwelling units which could be constructed on such lot or combination of lots, pursuant to Section 28.20.060 exceeds 100; or

3. Any portion of a multiple-family dwelling proposed to be constructed on the lot or combination of lots will be more than 250 feet from the right-of-way line of an abutting street.

When none of the three foregoing categories are applicable to the lot or combination of lots, the adequate access or internal circulation roadway as defined herein shall not be required where the lot or combination of lots abut on a previously dedicated street or streets and where the private driveway access from the nearest entry to the required off-street parking area to the point of connection with such street or streets does not exceed 150 lineal feet.

B. When the plot plan required by the Chief Building Official is filed, the Building Official shall forthwith submit the same to the Community Development Department and the Public Works Department for investigation, report and recommendation. Such reports and recommendations shall be submitted https://ecode360.com/print/SA5006?guid=44110663 8/9
Item III Page 24 of 39
7/23/26, 12:33 PM R-3 LIMITED MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE AND R-4 HOTEL-MOTEL-MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE - City of Santa B… to the Planning Commission for hearing at its earliest convenience, and such Planning Commission shall, following such hearing, approve, modify or reject such proposed adequate access or internal circulation roadway in respect to location and connection with existing abutting street or streets.

C. The owner or applicant may appeal any decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council in the manner provided by Chapter 1.30 of this code.

D. Following approval by the Planning Commission or the City Council, as the case may be, of the proposed adequate access or internal circulation roadway shown on the plot plan, the owner or applicant shall:

1. By formal instrument offer to dedicate said proposed roadway as a public street; and

2. Either complete the required improvement of such public street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer or agree to complete such improvement within a period of one year, such agreement to be secured by a good and sufficient surety bond in a principal sum equivalent to the estimated cost of such public street on the basis of estimates to be provided by the Department of Public Works, and conditioned on final completion of the construction of said street.

E. Upon completion of such public street improvement to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, or the execution and acceptance of an agreement to complete, secured by bond, a building permit shall then be issued if the requirements of other applicable ordinances have been met. The offer of dedication shall continue until, and shall not be accepted until, the required improvements have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (Ord. 3118, 1966; Ord. 3119, 1966; Ord. 3710, 1974; Ord. 5630, 2013) § 28.21.130. Development Plan Approval.

Development plan review and approval by the Planning Commission are sometimes required by Chapter 28.85 of this code.
(Ord. 4140, 1982; Ord. 5609, 2013)
§ 28.21.131. Development Potential.

Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, no application for a land use permit for a nonresidential construction project will be accepted or approved on or after December 6, 1989 unless the project complies with the provisions outlined in Development Plan Approval, Chapter 28.85. (Ord. 4670, 1991; Ord. 5609, 2013)
https://ecode360.com/print/SA5006?guid=44110663
Item III Page 25 of 39

City of Santa Barbara

PLANNING COMMISSION

MINUTES
AUGUST 15, 2024
1:00 P.M.

City Hall, Council Chambers
735 Anacapa Street
SantaBarbaraCA.gov
COMMISSION MEMBERS:

John M. Baucke, Chair
Devon Wardlow, Vice Chair
Brian Barnwell
Lucille Boss
Donald DeLuccio
Sheila Lodge
Lesley Wiscomb
CITY COUNCIL LIAISON:

Mike Jordan
STAFF:

Tava Ostrenger, Assistant City Attorney
Megan Arciniega, Senior Planner
Mariah Johnson, Commission Secretary

CALL TO ORDER
Chair Baucke called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m.

I. ROLL CALL
Chair John M. Baucke, Vice Chair Devon Wardlow, Commissioners Brian Barnwell, Lucille Boss, Donald DeLuccio, Sheila Lodge, and Lesley Wiscomb

Absent: Boss

STAFF PRESENT
Tava Ostrenger, Assistant City Attorney
Megan Arciniega, Senior Planner
Kathleen Kennedy, Project Planner
Christopher Bell, City TV Production Supervisor
Janet Ahern, City TV Production Specialist
Mariah Johnson, Commission Secretary
II. PRELIMINARY MATTERS
A. Requests for continuances, withdrawals, postponements, or addition of ex-agenda items:

Ms. Arciniega announced that the project previously agendized for today’s hearing, 3237 Edgewater Way, has been postponed indefinitely.

B. Announcements and appeals:

No announcements.

EXHIBIT D Item III Page 26 of 39

Planning Commission Minutes August 15, 2024 Page 2 of 6 C. Comments from members of the public pertaining to items not on this agenda:

Public comment opened at 1:01 p.m., and as no one wished to speak, it closed.

III. CONCEPT REVIEW AND INITIATION REQUEST
ACTUAL TIME: 1:02 P.M.
1 HOT SPRINGS ROAD
Assessor’s Parcel Number: 017-393-002
Zoning Designation: R-1/S-D-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) Application Number: PLN2024-00217 Filing Date: May 26, 2024 Owner: Santa Barbara Cemetery Association
Applicant: Brian Holland
The proposed project consists of a new 22-unit residential development comprised of two- and three-story townhouses with private garages and carports on a vacant lot of approximately 2.4 acres. The project is proposed under the variable density provisions of Title 28 and consists of 5 studios, 5 two-bedroom units, and 12 three-bedroom units. Four units (20%) would be restricted to low- income households. The average unit size is 1,421 square feet and the gross building area is 31,258 square feet. The proposed density is 11 dwelling units per acre.

The project site is currently zoned R-1/S-D-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) and has a Coastal Land Use Plan designation of Parks/Open Space. The project includes a request to change the zone to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/ Coastal Overlay) and to change the Coastal Land Use Plan designation to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac).

The purpose of an initiation discussion is to determine whether a project generally meets City policies, identify potential zoning and land use designation changes, and provide the applicant with positive comments to move forward with the proposal, if warranted. The purpose of the concept review hearing is to allow the Planning Commission and the public an opportunity to review the proposed project and provide comments prior to the applicant designing the project any further.

No appealable decisions will be made at this meeting, nor will any determination be made regarding environmental review of the proposed project.

As currently designed, the project would require the following discretionary applications at a future time:

From the Planning Commission:

A. A Setback Modification to allow encroachments into the required front and interior setbacks (SBMC §28.92.110 and 28.21.060);
B. A Coastal Development Permit to allow the proposed development in the NonAppealable Jurisdiction of the City’s Coastal Zone (SBMC §28.44.060); and Item III Page 27 of 39

Planning Commission Minutes August 15, 2024 Page 3 of 6 From the City Council:

C. A Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the coastal land use designation from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac); and D. A Local Coastal Program Amendment for a Coastal Zoning Map Amendment to change the zone from R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/ Coastal Overlay) Zone.

Kathleen Kennedy, Project Planner, gave the Staff presentation.

Brian Holland, Applicant, gave the Applicant presentation, and was joined by Mark Kirkhart, DesignARC, Architect; and Rick Hoffman, Board Member, Santa Barbara Cemetery Association.

Public comment opened at 1:27 p.m., and as no one wished to speak, it closed.

Written correspondence from David Fishbein, Joseph Miller, and Harry Fowler was acknowledged.

Commission comments:

Commissioner Wiscomb:
• Widen the parkway from 4 feet to something more substantial, particularly with all of the trees.
• Show tree replacement ratios.
• Suggestion to mix the affordable units to include one studio, two 2 bedrooms, and one 3 bedroom. This would allow for more flexibility for people with 80% AMI. • Appreciates the idea of celebrating the Coastal Zone in the roundabout. • Staff should discuss the R-3 versus HRC-2 with the Coastal Commission. • Greatly appreciates that the team is local as the project site is quite visible. • Suggestion to have spaces for kids. Looks forward to seeing the location and development of those spaces.
• Appreciates the permeable pavement.
• Suggestion to celebrate the entrance from Channel Drive as an ADA entrance. • Appreciates the architecture and concept.
• Supports the initiation request.
• The site is suitable for a housing project.
• The density is appropriate.
• Prefers the R-3 zone over HRC-2.

Commissioner Wardlow:
• This is a great first step and is excited to see land that is underutilized move forward with a project that would support the City’s housing goals.
• The project benefits the cemetery which is a huge community benefit and gives some economic viability back to them.
• The site is appropriate for a housing project.
• Supportive of the density.
• Supportive of the R-3 zone.

Item III Page 28 of 39

Planning Commission Minutes August 15, 2024 Page 4 of 6 • Appreciates the varied approach to the heights of the building. Appreciates the different types of affordable unit sizes proposed. Agrees with Commissioner Wiscomb’s comment regarding varied sizes for the affordable units.
• Consider a playground or something on site for kids.
• With the development of the bike baths near the site ensure there are spaces for bikes. • Appreciates the design from the meandering street perspective as it is very Santa Barbara.
• Appreciates that the project has permeable pavement even though that can be a more expensive choice for the developer.
• Preserving the Historic Landmark at the entry point is important. • The project is compatible with the neighborhood as the applicant is in the trust of their most prominent neighbor.
• Continue to work with the City regarding the infrastructure development with Highway 101 and the railroad.

Commissioner DeLuccio:
• Suggestion to recognize the site with a plaque, possibly incorporating it into the fountain. • The project site is suitable for housing.
• Appreciates how the affordable units are dispersed across the site. Agrees with Commissioner Wiscomb’s comment regarding varied sizes for the affordable units. • Shares Chair Baucke’s concerns regarding the environmental reports. • The density is appropriate.
• The design is wonderful and well developed at this early stage of the process. • Prefers the R-3 zone but understands the concern of his fellow Commissioners regarding the Coastal Commission.

Commissioner Lodge:
• The project site is suitable for a housing project.
• The proposed residential density is appropriate.
• Supports the Initiation of the rezone to R-3 and the Land Use designation change to Medium Density Residential.
• Appreciates the proposed project plans as they look like Santa Barbara. • Chair Baucke expressed some concerns about the front door being on the south side of the site, but because the project creates a separate community it is appropriate for the entry to be on the driveway side.

Commissioner Barnwell:
• The project site is suitable for a housing project.
• The proposed residential density is appropriate.
• Supports the Initiation of the rezone to R-3 and the land use designation change to Medium Density Residential
• People living in this development will frequently visit the beach, the bird refuge, and Coast Village Road. Consider this path of preference for the pedestrians in terms of the architecture. The ADA access and any adornment that announces the entrance should be at that end of the project.

Item III Page 29 of 39

Planning Commission Minutes August 15, 2024 Page 5 of 6 Chair Baucke
• The project site is suitable for a housing project, but he believes it needs to be tempered with the environmental studies that are forthcoming. He is concerned about the studies as they may introduce mitigation measures that could be problematic for the cost structure.
• The density is fine.
• Supports the 20% affordable units and would be less supportive of the project if that number dropped.
• Suggestion for the HRC-2 zone, but staff will convene with the Coastal Commission regarding the zone.
• The land use designation change to medium density residential is appropriate. • Concerned about how frontage buildings 1 and 2 fit the street. • The woonerf can either make or break this project.

MOTION: Wiscomb / DeLuccio
Initiate the zone change from R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) and initiate the Coastal Land Use designation change from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac),with the following comments:

1. The project site is suitable for a multi-unit housing project.

2. The proposed residential density is appropriate.

3. Supportive of the Front Setback Modification and Coastal Development Permit.

The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: 6 Noes: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 1 (Boss)
IV. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
ACTUAL TIME: 2:24 P.M.

A. Committee and Liaison Reports:

1. Staff Hearing Officer Liaison Report
No report.

2. Other Committee and Liaison Reports
a. Commissioner Lodge reported on the Single Family Design Board (SFDB) meeting of August 7, 2024.
b. Commissioner DeLuccio reported on the Historic Landmarks Commission (HLC) meeting of August 14, 2024.

B. Discussion on Subcommittees and Workshops
Discussion held.

Item III Page 30 of 39

Planning Commission Minutes August 15, 2024 Page 6 of 6 V. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Baucke adjourned the meeting at 2:29 p.m.

Submitted by,
__________________________________________
Mariah Johnson, Commission Secretary
Item III Page 31 of 39

City of Santa Barbara

HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION

MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2024
1:30 P.M.

David Gebhard Public Meeting Room
630 Garden Street
SantaBarbaraCA.gov
COMMISSION MEMBERS:

Anthony Grumbine, Chair
Steve Hausz, Vice Chair
Keith Butler
Dennis Doordan
Michael Drury
Cass Ensberg
Ed Lenvik
Charles McClure
Robert Ooley
ADVISORY MEMBER: Dr. Michael Glassow
CITY COUNCIL LIAISON: Kristen Sneddon
PLANNING COMMISSION LIAISON: Donald
DeLuccio
STAFF:

Tava Ostrenger, Assistant City Attorney
Ellen Kokinda, Design Review Supervisor
Nicole Hernandez, Architectural Historian
Heidi Reidel, Assistant Planner
Mariah Johnson, Commission Secretary
(3:15PM) NEW ITEM: CONCEPT REVIEW

3. 1 HOT SPRINGS RD
Assessor's Parcel Number: 017-393-002
Zone: R-1/SD-3
Application Number: PLN2024-00217
Owner: Santa Barbara Cemetery Association
Brian Holland, Managing Member
Applicant: Melisa Turner, DesignARC Inc.
(Located in El Pueblo Viejo Landmark District, Part I. Only the Charles Caldwell Park Watering Trough and Fountain on site is a designated a City Landmark, constructed in 1911-1912 by Francis W. Wilson in the Beaux Arts style. Proposal for a new 22-unit residential development comprised of two- and three-story townhouses with private garages and carports. The average unit size is 1,421 square feet and the gross building area is 31,258 square feet. Project requires approval from the Planning Commission for a Setback Modification to allow encroachments into the required front and interior setbacks; a Coastal Development Permit; a Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the coastal land use designation from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac); and a Local Coastal Program Amendment for a Coastal Zoning Map Amendment to change the zone from R-1/SD3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/ Coastal Overlay) Zone.)
No final appealable action will take place at this meeting. Project Compatibility Findings will be required for Project Design Approval.

Historic Significance Report*
*Available for view online at SantaBarbaraCA.gov/HLC
Actual time: 4:25 p.m.

EXHIBIT E Item III Page 32 of 39

Historic Landmarks Commission Minutes September 25, 2024 Page 2 of 2

Present: Mark Kirkhart, Principal, DesignARC Inc.; Melisa Turner, Senior Project Manager, DesignARC Inc.; Mark Shields, DesignARC Inc.; and Kathleen Kennedy, Project Planner, City of Santa Barbara
Staff comments: Ms. Kennedy stated that this project went before PC on August 15, 2024 where they initiated the Local Coastal Plan amendments that allow this project to move forward to HLC. These amendments will need to be approved by City Council and the Coastal Commission. Staff is looking for comments on story poles, Project Compatibility Findings, and the Front and Interior Setback Modifications.

Public comment opened at 4:50 p.m., and as no one wished to speak, it closed.

Written correspondence from Cristo Artusio was acknowledged.

Motion: Continue indefinitely with comments:

1. The Commission thanks the Applicant for a very beautiful and supportable project.

2. The Commission supports making the exception to not require story poles based on the Applicant’s persuasive design, 3D renderings, and lack of neighbors.

3. Break up the visual pattern of the buildings through a variety of techniques to make them individual designs as opposed to repeated patterns.

4. Study relating the front corner buildings to the trough as they will be the primary view from the public right of way.

5. Include unified paving. The landscape plan is acceptable.

6. Suggestion to break up, modulate, and/or limit the arches as they are strong design features.

7. Restudy the large, two story opening to be more traditional and less contemporary in wall to window ratios as well as proportions.

8. The Commission supports the Front and Interior Setback Modifications.

9. The project generally meets the Project Compatibility Findings of neighborhood compatibility, mass, bulk, and scale with additional refinements.

10.Study the areas around the trough so that they feel more connected with the property.

Action: Ooley/Butler, 7/0/0. (Hausz and McClure absent.) Motion carried.

Item III Page 33 of 39

APPLICABLE COASTAL ACT & COASTAL LAND USE PLAN POLICIES 1 Hot Springs Road
PLN2024-00217
August 5, 2026

COASTAL LAND USE PLAN & COASTAL ACT POLICIES

LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT

CITY PLANNING EFFORTS & PROGRAMS
CLUP 2.1-1 Increased Densities for Affordable Housing. The City may allow for increased densities beyond that established by underlying land use designations and zoning for the following types of affordable housing developments, so long as such development is found consistent with the policies of the Coastal LUP:
• Density Bonus.
• Inclusionary Housing.
• Lot Area Modification for affordable housing only.

CLUP 2.1-15 Maintenance and Enhancement of Public Access. As outlined in Coastal Act Section 30252, the location and amount of new development or substantial redevelopment should maintain and enhance public access to the coast by (1) facilitating the provision or extension of transit service, (2) providing commercial facilities within or adjoining residential development or in other areas that will minimize the use of coastal access roads, (3) providing non-automobile circulation within the development, (4) providing adequate parking facilities or providing substitute means of serving the development with public transportation, (5) assuring the potential for public transit for high intensity uses, and (6) assuring that the recreational needs of new residents will not overload nearby coastal recreation areas by correlating the amount of development with local park acquisition and development plans with the provision of onsite recreational facilities to serve the new development.

CLUP 2.1-16 Siting of New Development. As outlined in Coastal Act Section 30250(a), new and substantially redeveloped residential, commercial, or industrial development, except as otherwise provided in the Coastal LUP, shall be located within, contiguous with, or in close proximity to, existing developed areas able to accommodate it or, where such areas are not able to accommodate it, in other areas with adequate public services and where it will not have significant adverse effects, either individually or cumulatively, on coastal resources.

WATER QUALITY
Storm Water Management

EXHIBIT F
Item III Page 34 of 39

APPLICABLE COASTAL ACT & COASTAL LAND USE PLAN POLICIES 1 HOT SPRINGS ROAD
AUGUST 5, 2026
PAGE 2 OF 5
CLUP 4.2-22 Storm Water Management. All development shall be planned, sited, and designed to protect the water quality and hydrology of coastal waters in accordance with the requirements of the City’s Storm Water Management Program, approved by the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board under California’s statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Storm Water Permit (Order No. 2013-0001 DWQ, effective July 1, 2013, or any amendment to or re-issuance thereof).

SCENIC RESOURCES & VISUAL QUALITY

COASTAL ACT POLICIES
30251 The scenic and visual qualities of coastal areas shall be considered and protected as a resource of public importance. Permitted development shall be sited and designed to protect views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, to minimize the alteration of natural land forms, to be visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas, and, where feasible, to restore and enhance visual quality in visually degraded areas. New development in highly scenic areas such as those designated in the California Coastline Preservation and Recreation Plan prepared by the Department of Parks and Recreation and by local government shall be subordinate to the character of its setting.

CITY PLANNING EFFORTS & PROGRAMS
CLUP 4.3-1 Enhance Visual Quality. Encourage and assist, where possible, creative public and private efforts to restore the scenic beauty of visually degraded areas of the City’s Coastal Zone.

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW POLICIES
General
CLUP 4.3-2 Restore and Enhance Visually Degraded Areas. Development shall, where feasible, restore and enhance visual quality in visually degraded areas.

CLUP 4.3-3 Design Review. Development in the Coastal Zone shall be reviewed by the Architectural Board of Review, Historic Landmarks Commission, or Single Family Design Board in accordance with established rules and procedures, as applicable. If any of the rules, procedures, or actions of these design review boards/commissions conflict with the policies of the Coastal LUP, the policies of the Coastal LUP shall take precedence.

Siting, Design, and Review
CLUP 4.3-7 Compatible Development. Development shall be sited and designed to be visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas and where appropriate, protect the unique characteristics of areas that are popular visitor destination points for recreational uses.

Grading, Landscaping, Walls and Fences
Item III Page 35 of 39

CLUP 4.3-11 Landscape Plans Required. Applications for new development and substantial redevelopment shall be required to have an approved landscape plan prepared by a licensed design professional that demonstrates that the landscaping associated with the new development or substantial redevelopment is visually compatible with the character of the area and minimizes impacts to visual and scenic resources. As a condition of the permit, the applicant shall be required to implement and fulfill all obligations of the landscape plan for the life of the development. The following standards shall apply:
• Ensure vegetation choices are appropriate for environmental conditions, including but not limited to, exposure, soil, and water needs. Unless otherwise specified in Policies

4.1-17 or 5.1-38, within and near areas of natural vegetation and natural habitats, require drought-tolerant plant species, except where inappropriate for the given habitat type (e.g., creek beds and wetlands), that blend with the existing natural vegetation and natural habitats on the site. Within High Fire Hazard Areas, plant species should be fire retardant. The use of any plant species listed as problematic, a noxious weed, or invasive by the California Native Plant Society, the California Exotic Pest Plant Council, the State of California, or the federal government shall be avoided unless necessary for habitat restoration of a sensitive species (e.g., Monarch Butterfly). • Landscaping shall be designed to avoid obstructing or limiting public view impacts for the life of the development. Plant materials shall be chosen to avoid impacts at their maximum growth potential. The property owner shall maintain new plant materials to avoid their inadvertently intruding into the protected viewshed. • Landscaping and irrigation shall be planned with consideration for water conservation through use of water-wise plant species; water-efficient irrigation systems, including using microspray, drip irrigation, and mulching; and designing irrigation to eliminate runoff.
• Enforce City regulations that require maintenance of the trees, plants, irrigation systems, and other improvements shown on an approved landscape plan.

CLUP 4.3-13 Tree Protection and Replacement.

A. Trees qualifying as ESHA shall be fully protected as required by the Biological Resources protection policies (Policy 4.1-1 et seq.).

B. For non-ESHA trees:
i. Development shall be sited and designed to preserve and protect, to the extent feasible, mature trees (trees four inches in diameter or greater at four feet six inches above grade in height) and trees important to the visual quality of the property; ii. Mature or visually important trees should be integrated into the project design rather than removed or impacted through encroachment into the root zones; and iii. Where the removal of mature or visually important trees cannot be avoided through the implementation of project alternatives or where development encroachments into the root zone result in the loss or worsened health of the trees, the removed tree(s) shall be replaced on a minimum 1:1 basis. This standard can also be Item III Page 36 of 39

APPLICABLE COASTAL ACT & COASTAL LAND USE PLAN POLICIES 1 HOT SPRINGS ROAD
AUGUST 5, 2026
PAGE 4 OF 5
increased up to 10:1 depending on the type of tree removed, lot size, and size and expected survival rate of replacement trees.

CULTURAL RESOURCES

COASTAL ACT POLICIES
30244 Where development would adversely impact archaeological or paleontological resources as identified by the State Historic Preservation Officer, reasonable mitigation measures shall be required.

CITY PLANNING EFFORTS & PROGRAMS
CLUP 4.4-1 Preserve, Protect, and Enhance Cultural Resources. Protect the heritage of the City by preserving, protecting, and enhancing the City’s pre-historic and historic past, which includes, but it is not limited to, important or unique pre-historic and historic archaeological artifacts, objects, and/or sites, and important paleontological resources and sites.

COASTAL HAZARDS

COASTAL ACT POLICIES
30253 New development shall do all of the following: (a) Minimize risks to life and property in areas of high geologic, flood, and fire hazard. (b) Assure stability and structural integrity, and neither create nor contribute significantly to erosion, geologic instability, or destruction of the site or surrounding area or in any way require the construction of protective devices that would substantially alter natural landforms along bluffs and cliffs. (c) Be consistent with requirements imposed by an air pollution control district or the State Air Resources Board as to each particular development. (d) Minimize energy consumption and vehicle miles traveled. (e) Where appropriate, protect special communities and neighborhoods that, because of their unique characteristics, are popular visitor destination points for recreational uses.

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW POLICIES
General
CLUP 5.1-18 Hazard Risk Reduction. New development and substantial redevelopment shall do all of the following, over the expected life of the development, factoring in the effects of sea level rise:

A. Minimize risks to life and property from high geologic, flood, and fire hazards; B. Assure stability and structural integrity; and
C. Neither create nor contribute significantly to erosion, geologic instability, or destruction of the site or surrounding area.

Item III Page 37 of 39

PUBLIC WORKS & ENERGY FACILITIES

COASTAL ACT POLICIES
30250 (a) New residential, commercial, or industrial development, except as otherwise provided in this division, shall be located within, contiguous with, or in close proximity to, existing developed areas able to accommodate it or, where such areas are not able to accommodate it, in other areas with adequate public services and where it will not have significant adverse effects, either individually or cumulatively, on coastal resources.

Item III Page 38 of 39

City of Santa Barbara
California
Exhibit G: Final Mitigated Negative Declaration dated for the August 13, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting, is available electronically for view online at:
https://santabarbaraca.gov/1HotSpringsRoad.

EXHIBIT G
Item III Page 39 of 39
City of Santa Barbara

PLANNING COMMISSION

MINUTES
AUGUST 13, 2026
1:00 P.M.

City Hall, Council Chambers
735 Anacapa Street
SantaBarbaraCA.gov
COMMISSION MEMBERS:

Lucille Boss, Chair
Donald DeLuccio, Vice Chair
Brian Barnwell
John M. Baucke
Benjamin Peterson
Devon Wardlow
Lesley Wiscomb
CITY COUNCIL LIAISON:

Mike Jordan
STAFF:

Tava Ostrenger, Chief Assistant City Attorney
Megan Arciniega, Senior Planner
Jasper Carman, Commission Secretary

CALL TO ORDER
Chair Boss called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m.

I. ROLL CALL
Chair Lucille Boss, Vice Chair Donald DeLuccio, Commissioners John M. Baucke, Benjamin Peterson, and Lesley Wiscomb

Absent: Commissioners Brian Barnwell and Devon Wardlow

STAFF PRESENT
Tava Ostrenger, Chief Assistant City Attorney
Megan Arciniega, Senior Planner
Julia Pujo, Environmental Analyst
Pilar Plummer, Associate Planner
Christopher Bell, City TV Production Supervisor
Janet Ahern, City TV Production Specialist
Jasper Carman, Commission Secretary
II. PRELIMINARY MATTERS
A. Requests for continuances, withdrawals, postponements, or addition of ex-agenda items:

No requests.

B. Announcements and appeals:

ATTACHMENT 2
Planning Commission Minutes August 13, 2026 Page 2 of 4 Ms. Carman announced that the staff reports and agendas for both the August 17, 2026 Joint Planning Commission and City Council hearing and the August 20, 2026 Planning Commission hearing will be distributed to the Commission after today’s hearing.

C. Review, consideration, and action on the following draft Planning Commission minutes and resolutions:

1. July 2, 2026 Planning Commission Minutes

2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 006-26
3245 Cliff Dr

3. July 9, 2026 Planning Commission Minutes

4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 007-26
500 James Fowler
Public comment opened at 1:03 p.m., and as no one wished to speak, it closed.

MOTION: DeLuccio / Wiscomb
Approve the July 2, 2026 minutes and resolutions as presented.

The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: 4 Noes: 0 Abstain: 1 (Baucke) Absent: 2 (Barnwell and Wardlow) Public comment opened at 1:06 p.m., and as no one wished to speak, it closed.

MOTION: Baucke / DeLuccio
Approve the July 9, 2026 minutes and resolutions as presented.

The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: 4 Noes: 0 Abstain: 1 (Wiscomb) Absent: 2 (Barnwell and Wardlow) D. Comments from members of the public pertaining to items not on this agenda:

Public comment opened at 1:07 p.m., and as no one wished to speak, it closed.

Written correspondence from Onalisa Hoodes and Patrice Surmeier was acknowledged.

III. NEW ITEM
ACTUAL TIME: 1:08 P.M.
1 HOT SPRINGS ROAD
Assessor’s Parcel Number: 017-393-002 & 017-393-003
Zoning Designation: R-1 / S-D-3 (One-Family Residence / Coastal Overlay) Application Number: PLN2024-00217 Filing Date: 11/27/2024 Applicant: Brian Holland / 1 HSR GP, LLC
Owner: Rick Hoffman, Santa Barbara Cemetery Association Planning Commission Minutes August 13, 2026 Page 3 of 4 Request for a Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCP Amendment), to change the zone of APNs: 017-393-002 & -003) from R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/ Coastal Overlay) and to change the coastal land use designation from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac).

Associated with the amendments is a proposal for a new multi-unit residential development comprised of 22 units under the variable density provisions of Title 28. The development consists of two- and three-story townhouses within seven individual buildings. The unit mix includes 5 studios, 5 two-bedroom units, and 12 three-bedroom units with an average unit size of 1,421 square feet at 11 du/acre. Two units (10%) would be restricted to lower-income households. The project includes 50 parking spaces, comprised of 39 spaces within private garages, 1 uncovered parking space to serve a studio unit, and 10 uncovered guest parking spaces. New hardscape and landscape improvements are proposed throughout the site.

1. Planning Commission action on the following is requested:
a. Mitigated Negative Declaration
b. Mitigated Monitoring Reporting Program.

2. Planning Commission recommendation to City Council on the following is requested:
a. A Local Coastal Program Amendment for a Zoning Map Amendment to change the zone from R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/ Coastal Overlay) Zone;
b. A Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the coastal land use designation from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac).

Pilar Plummer, Associate Planner, gave the Staff presentation. Julia Pujo, Environmental Analyst, was available to answer questions.

Brian Holland, 1 HSR GP, LLC, and Rick Hoffman, Santa Barbara Cemetery Association, gave the Applicant presentation.

Public comment opened at 1:28 p.m., and as no one wished to speak, it closed.

MOTION: Baucke / DeLuccio Assigned Resolution No. 008-26 Make the findings to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring Reporting Program, and recommend City Council approve the Local Coastal Program Amendments, as outlined in the Staff Report dated August 6, 2026, with the revision to Exhibit D - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, on page 5, in the section titled “BIO-1 Tree Replacement for Removed Oak Tree”, revise the first sentence to state “One (1) living California Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) proposed for removal on the northern property line shall be replaced with three (3) 48-inch box minimum of the same species on the project site.” The motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: 5 Noes: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 2 (Barnwell and Wardlow) Planning Commission Minutes August 13, 2026 Page 4 of 4 IV. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
ACTUAL TIME: 1:50 P.M.

A. Committee and Liaison Reports:

1. Staff Hearing Officer Liaison Report
Vice Chair DeLuccio reported on the Staff Hearing Officer meeting of August 5, 2026.

2. Other Committee and Liaison Reports
a. Vice Chair DeLuccio reported on the July 29, 2026 and August 12, 2026 meetings of the Historic Landmarks Commission.

B. Discussion on Subcommittees and Workshops
Discussion held.

V. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Boss adjourned the meeting at 1:57 p.m.

Submitted by,
__________________________________________
Jasper Carman, Commission Secretary
1 Ordinance No.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA

BARBARA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP IN TITLE APX SECTIONAL
MAPS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1 HOT SPRINGS
(APN 017-393-002 AND -003) FROM R-1/SD-3 (ONE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE/COASTAL OVERLAY) TO R-3/SD-3 (LIMITED

MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE/ COASTAL OVERLAY) ZONE
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1
Effective immediately upon Coastal Commission Certification of the Local Coastal Program Amendment, Title APX Sectional Map, Map SA04 and SB04 of the Santa Barbara Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
2 3
1 Resolution No.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA

BARBARA AMENDING THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO
CHANGE THE COASTAL LAND USE DESIGNATION OF 1 HOT
SPRINGS ROAD (APN 017-393-002 AND -003) FROM PARKS/OPEN SPACE TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (12 DU/AC) AND TO
REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM R-1/S-D-3 (ONE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE/COASTAL OVERLAY) TO R-3/SD-3 (LIMITED

MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE/COASTAL OVERLAY) ZONE
WHEREAS, Section 30514 of the California Coastal Act provides that all amendments to a certified Local Coastal Plan shall be processed in accordance with Sections 30512 and 30513 of the California Coastal Act; and
WHEREAS, the City accepted an application from 1 HSR GP, LLC on behalf of the property owner, Santa Barbara Cemetery Association, in order to process a request for a Local Coastal Program Amendment for the property located at 1 Hot Springs Road; and WHEREAS, on August 15, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing of the Local Coastal Program Amendment and voted 6 – 0 to intiate the land use designation change and rezone for property located at 1 Hot Springs Road; WHEREAS, on August 13, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a recommendation to the City Council for a Local Coastal Program Amendment and adoption of the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration, dated July 24, 2026 and voted 5 – 0 to to recommend that City Council amend the Local Coastal Program; and WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Title 7 of the Government Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, all public noticing required pursuant to the Santa Barbara Municipal Code, California Code of Regulations Title 14, §13515, and California Government Code §65090 were completed; and
WHEREAS, on September 29, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to introduce and subsequently adopt an Ordinance of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending the Land Use Designation and Zoning for Property Located at 1 Hot Springs Road; WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted said ordinance in accordance with Charter section 511; and
2 WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered all materials and exhibits in the current record relative to this amendment, including the project and all staff reports, and considered a Local Coastal Program Amendment and concluded that the Local Coastal Program amendment is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City’s Coastal Land Use Plan and City Charter.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA THAT:

1. Upon the enactment of the ordinance introduced on September 29, 2026, the Council of the City of Santa Barbara hereby amends the Local Coastal Program by changing the Zoning Designation of the property located at 1 Hot Springs (APNs 017-393-002 and -017-393-003) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/ Coastal Overlay) Zone by amending Map SA04 and SB04 of Title APX Sectional Maps.

2. The City Council hereby amends the Coastal Land Use Plan by changing the land use designation of the property located at 1 Hot Springs (APNs 017-393-002 and -017- 393-003) to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac).

3. The City Council makes the following findings with respect to amending the City’s Local Coastal Program:
a. The amendment to change the coastal land use designation from Parks/Open Space to Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac) is appropriate because the proposed land use designation allows for residential development on an underutilized vacant lot that would be consistent with residential uses and density allowed on nearby Los Patos Way and Coast Village Road on a property with adequate public resources and in proximity to coastal resources and commercial services.
b. The amendment to change the zone from R-1/SD-3 (One-Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) to R-3/SD-3 (Limited Multiple Family Residence/Coastal Overlay) Zone is appropriate because the zoning designation would allow for multi-unit residential development on an underutilized vacant lot in proximity to coastal resources that would be consistent with allowed residential uses and density on nearby Los Patos Way and Coastal Village Road.

4. The City's certified Local Coastal Program, including this amendment, shall be implemented in a manner fully in conformity with the Coastal Act of 1976.

5. The Council of the City of Santa Barbara directs the Community Development Director to prepare the Local Coastal Program Amendment application for submission to the California Coastal Commission for review and certification. 3 6. The Local Coastal Program Amendment shall take effect automatically upon California Coastal Commission certification, unless the California Coastal Commission proposes suggested modifications to the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment. In the event that the California Coastal Commission certifies the Local Coastal Program Amendment with suggested modifications, City Council approval of the modified Local Coastal Program Amendment shall require a separate action by the City Council following California Coastal Commission certification. In this case, the Local Coastal Program Amendment would become effective on the date the California Coastal Commission concurs at public hearing that the City Council properly accepted the modified Local Coastal Program Amendment with suggested modifications.

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Council Agenda Report
Agenda Date: September 29, 2026
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Sustainability & Resilience Department and Public Works Department Subject: Contract for Laguna Flood Resilience Study [Resolution; Agreement] Recommendation:

That Council:

A. Authorize the Sustainability & Resilience Director to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Stantec Consulting Services for the Laguna Flood Resilience Study in the amount of $993,125 and authorize the Sustainability & Resilience Director to approve expenditures of up to $99,312 for extra services that may result from necessary changes in the scope of work during this process; and
B. Adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending Resolution No. 2026-057, Adopting the Budget for Fiscal Year 2027 to Appropriate $291,797 from the Creeks Restoration and Water Quality Improvement Capital Fund for the Laguna Flood Resilience Study.

Discussion
Background
The Laguna Creek Watershed, the area that funnels rainfall to the Laguna Creek, covers approximately 1,800 acres in the heart of Santa Barbara, including much of Downtown, the Lower Eastside, and the Riviera. Historically, the watershed drained into a large coastal wetland called El Estero, located where the flood-prone parts of Downtown and the Lower Eastside are today. In the early 1900s, El Estero was filled and paved over to make room for development, and Laguna Creek was built in its place to convey storm water to the ocean. As the City continued to develop, more of the natural drainage system was paved over, which reduced how much rain can soak into the ground and increased the amount of water that flows downhill to low-lying areas. Since parts of the lower watershed are near sea level, a tide gate and pump station had to be installed to prevent ocean water from flooding those areas during high tides.

Agenda Item No. 11
Council Agenda Report
Contract for Laguna Flood Resilience Study [Resolution; Agreement]

Page 2 ends

The existing storm drain system, Laguna Creek, tide gate, and pump station are limited in their ability to convey storm water out of the low-lying areas where El Estero once existed because the area is relatively flat and Laguna Creek is narrow, below sea level, and its outlet can be blocked by a seasonal sand berm. As a result, storm water pools in the low-lying areas during heavy rainstorms, flooding residential, commercial, industrial, and recreational areas as well as critical infrastructure including the El Estero Water Resource Center, Highway 101 under crossings, and the Union Pacific Railroad. Rising sea levels and changes in rainfall patterns are expected to make flooding more frequent and severe in the coming years.

Previous and Ongoing Flood Reduction Efforts
The flooding risks in the Laguna Watershed have been analyzed in several City efforts, including the 2001 Laguna Drainage System Design Study and 2007 Laguna Drainage System Improvement Study, which focused on Laguna Creek and the adjacent area and identified improvements to optimize the current system’s ability to move storm water.

Following those studies, the City implemented recommended improvements, including installing new storm drains on Gutierrez Street, replacing the pump station’s engines, pumps and other components, and periodically removing vegetation and sediment from Laguna Creek.

The City continues to maintain and operate the system as effectively as possible, but despite these efforts, flooding continues to affect the low-lying areas of Downtown and the Lower Eastside during heavy rainstorms.

In recent years, the 2021 Sea Level Rise Action Plan, 2026 Wastewater and Water Systems Climate Adaptation Plan, 2023 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, and 2025 Capital Improvement Program all identified flooding in the Laguna Watershed, particularly near the El Estero Water Resource Center, as a major hazard vulnerability. These plans called for updated flood risk analyses of the entire watershed and new options to mitigate flooding.

Laguna Flood Resilience Study
The goal of the Laguna Flood Resilience Study (Study) is to identify practical solutions to reduce flooding in the Laguna Watershed, while prioritizing environmental stewardship and improving the natural functions of Laguna Creek, Mission Creek Lagoon, and the surrounding watershed.

The Study will model current and future flood conditions across the watershed, evaluate a range of adaptation options, and identify priority improvements for the City's Capital Council Agenda Report
Contract for Laguna Flood Resilience Study [Resolution; Agreement]

Page 3 ends

Improvement Program. The Study will create the City’s first watershed-scale storm water model, which will be designed to be expanded over time to include other City watersheds. This modeling will eventually serve as the foundation for future storm water master plans that addresses flooding in other flood-prone parts of the City. The modeling will consider climate change impacts, including shifts in rainfall patterns, rising sea levels, and changing groundwater levels.

The Study will analyze three categories of adaptation options:

Storm Drain Improvements – The Study will identify infrastructure improvements that increase the storm drain system's ability to move storm water across the watershed to Laguna Creek and reduce flooding in the most vulnerable areas. This could include increasing the size of storm drain inlets and pipes or adding new storm drains.

Improvements to Laguna Creek – The Study will evaluate a range of options to improve Laguna Creek and its ability to drain storm water to the ocean, including improvements to the pump station and tide gate, restoration and widening of the creek channel and its joint outlet with Mission Lagoon, and management of the beach berm that can block the creek outlet.

These options will be considered not only for their flood reduction benefits, but also for their potential to restore more natural creek and lagoon functions, improve habitat, and enhance water quality.

Nature-based and Multi-Benefit Solutions – The Study will also identify opportunities to reduce storm water runoff across the watershed through nature-based approaches such as bioswales, infiltration basins, detention basins, and permeable landscapes. These solutions can slow storm water, increase infiltration, and reduce peak flows. This could help restore some of the natural functions that were lost as the watershed was paved over and developed, while improving groundwater recharge, water quality, and habitat.

These options will be evaluated for their effectiveness at reducing flood risks and ranked based on their environmental benefits, implementation feasibility, approximate costs, and alignment with other City priorities, giving decision makers a clear, evidence-based framework for prioritizing future infrastructure investments.

The Study will produce the following resources for the City:
• Watershed Model – A detailed computer model of the Laguna Watershed, owned by the City and designed to be updated and expanded to additional watersheds overtime; Council Agenda Report
Contract for Laguna Flood Resilience Study [Resolution; Agreement]

Page 4 ends

• Flood Hazard Maps – Updated maps showing the extent and depth of flooding for a range of storm sizes (5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year storms) under current and future climate conditions;
• Recommended Adaptation Options – A prioritized list of projects for inclusion in the City’s Capital Improvement Program;
• Technical Report – A detailed report for City staff documenting the model, methods, and findings to guide implementation of capital improvements and support future updates and expansion of the model to additional watersheds; and • Public-Facing Final Report – A summary report for the community and City Council presenting the flood hazards and recommended adaptation options in accessible, nontechnical language.

The Adaptation and Resilience Division and Public Works Department are co-project managers on this project in close coordination with the Creeks Division and the Water Department. The Study will commence in Fall 2026. Community outreach has already started with a meeting for businesses and property owners near Laguna Creek held on September 16, 2026. Staff will present preliminary findings and adaptation options to Creeks Advisory Committee and Sustainability Council Committee in Fall 2027. A public draft report and additional community outreach are anticipated in Spring 2028, and Council consideration of the final report is anticipated by Fall 2028.

Stantec Consulting Services, Inc was selected through a competitive bidding process as the main consultant for this work effort due to their local presence, global experience, expert subconsultant team, and holistic approach to civil and environmental engineering, adaptation planning, and community engagement.

Budget/Financial Information
The professional services agreement with Stantec Consulting Services for the Laguna Flood Resilience Study is $993,125. Approval of the recommended action also delegates authority to approve $99,312 in possible contingencies should the need arise. Any extra services will require prior written approval via a contract amendment.

In Fiscal Year 2023, Council accepted and appropriated grant funding from the California State Coastal Conservancy for the City’s Wastewater and Water Systems Climate Adaptation Plan.

This grant was amended to reallocate $975,000 towards the Laguna Flood Resilience Study, which will implement the Plan’s need for new analysis of the Laguna Watershed and Council Agenda Report
Contract for Laguna Flood Resilience Study [Resolution; Agreement]

Page 5 ends

identification of projects that will protect the City’s wastewater infrastructure from flooding.

The grant will fund $819,640 for the professional services agreement and $155,360 for staff time for the Sustainability & Resilience staff who will manage the Laguna Flood Resilience Study.

On August 19, 2026, the Creeks Advisory Committee supported the recommendation to use $291,797 in Measure B reserve funds for the study, of which $19,000 will be used to procure the modeling software license and $272,797 for the professional services tasks related to evaluating adaptation options for Laguna Creek, Mission Lagoon, and nature-based solutions that would improve water quality and habitat and are consistent with Measure B funding criteria.

The work effort and grant funding are supported by matching funds in the form of staff time and overhead using existing City appropriations in the Public Works Department, which is the owner of the Laguna Pump Station and street storm drains, and the Creeks Division, which administers Measure B funds to restore creeks and improve water quality.

AB 339 Compliance: Staff has reviewed Government Code Section 3504.1 and determined that the noticing provisions do not apply to this contract.

Sustainability Impact
The Laguna Flood Resilience Study will advance goals contained in the City’s General Plan, Climate Action Plan, Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan, and Wastewater and Water Systems Climate Adaptation Plan to enhance our community’s resilience to climate change.

Environmental Review
Feasibility and planning studies are statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15262. Any adaptation projects that are implemented as a result of the Laguna Flood Resilience Study will be reviewed on a project-by-project basis.

A copy of the agreement may be requested from Sustainability & Resilience for public review by emailing [email protected].

Prepared by: Michael Wells, Climate Adaptation Analyst
Adam Hendel, Public Works Operations Manager
Submitted by: Melissa Hetrick, Acting Sustainability & Resilience Director Brian D’Amour, Public Works Director
Council Agenda Report
Contract for Laguna Flood Resilience Study [Resolution; Agreement]

Page 6 ends

Approved by: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. ___

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
BARBARA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2026-057, ADOPTING
THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027 TO APPROPRIATE
$291,797 FROM THE CREEKS RESTORATION AND WATER

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT CAPITAL FUND FOR THE LAGUNA
FLOOD RESILIENCE STUDY.

WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Charter, the City Administrator filed with the Council a proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2026; WHEREAS, the City Council is required to adopt a budget before the beginning of the fiscal year 2027 on July 1, 2026;
WHEREAS, the City Charter provides that at any public meeting after the adoption of the budget, the City Council may amend or supplement the budget by motion adopted by the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the total members of the City Council; and WHEREAS, as authorized by Resolution No. 2026-057, this Resolution approves the amendment to the budget as provided herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA THAT in accordance with the provisions of Section 1205 of the City Charter, the budget for the fiscal year 2027, as adopted by Resolution No. 2026-057, is hereby amended as follows:

1. The Council approves an increase in expenditure appropriations in the Sustainability and Resilience Department Fiscal Year 2027 Creeks Restoration and Water Quality Improvement Capital Fund in the amount of $291,797 for the Laguna Flood Resilience Study.

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Council Agenda Report
Agenda Date: September 29, 2026
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: City Administrator’s Office
Subject: Street Name Recommendations for Council Consideration in Renaming Calle César Chávez
Recommendation:

That Council:

A. Receive a report on the street renaming process conducted under the Santa Barbara Municipal Code Chapter 22.48 for Calle César Chávez between East Gutierrez and East Cabrillo Boulevard;
B. Select a street name and direct staff to proceed with preparing a Resolution for adoption to proceed with implementation of the address change; and C. Provide direction to staff on whether or not to develop a small business grant program to support specific financial impacts of facilitating the name change on businesses located in the designated corridor.

Executive Summary
On March 31, 2026, the City Council directed the City Administrator to initiate the process set forth in Santa Barbara Municipal Code (SBMC) Chapter 22.48 to consider renaming Calle César Chávez. This is a report on the process that was facilitated in coordination with the designated advisory board, the Neighborhood Advisory Council (NAC), as well as City staff outreach to the impacted neighborhood.

It is important to note that this report addresses the street renaming only. The related question of the March 31 holiday, also considered by Council on March 31, 2026, is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) and is proceeding separately through discussions with the City’s recognized employee organizations. Staff will return to Council on that matter under separate cover.

Agenda Item No. 12
Council Agenda Report
Street Name Recommendations for Council Consideration in Renaming Calle César Chávez

Page 2 ends

Discussion
In March, a request was brought forward asking the City to reconsider the street name of Calle César Chávez in light of recent public reporting and allegations concerning César Chávez’s personal conduct, and questions were raised as to whether continued recognition of this individual aligns with the City’s values and policies. On March 31, 2026, the City Administrator’s Office presented a Council Agenda Report addressing both the March 31 holiday and the street name.

With respect to the street, Council directed staff to initiate a process, including community engagement and required approvals, to consider the request to rename all of Calle César Chávez between East Gutierrez Street and East Cabrillo Boulevard. That direction did not select a replacement name; it started the code process by which a replacement name would be developed and recommended.

For context, the State acted on a parallel question during the same period. On March 26, 2026, the Governor signed legislation renaming the March 31 state holiday Farmworkers Day, effective immediately, with the stated intent of broadening recognition of the farmworker movement beyond a single figure and honoring all farm workers across California. That approach, recognizing a movement rather than an individual, is reflected in the primary name now recommended to Council by the NAC.

The Renaming Procedure under SBMC Chapter 22.48
SBMC Chapter 22.48 sets forth the following process for renaming public facilities, including streets, as follows:
(1) Submit the request to the City Administrator along with information substantiating the request set forth in SBMC Chapter 22.48;
(2) The City Administrator refers the request to an advisory board for consideration; (3) The advisory body holds a public hearing to consider the necessity or desirability of renaming the facility, and the proposed name and any alternatives; and (4) The advisory body prepares a recommendation for action by the City Council in relation to the request.

Steps one through four are complete. The City Administrator's recommendation was to designate the Neighborhood Advisory Council as the advisory body because the NAC includes Council Agenda Report
Street Name Recommendations for Council Consideration in Renaming Calle César Chávez

Page 3 ends

representatives from neighborhoods throughout the City and holds monthly public meetings.

Council action on the recommendation is the remaining step.

Principles, Policies and Priorities
Pursuant to SBMC Section 22.48.020, names for public facilities shall conform to the following principles, policies and priorities:
(1) The existing name is found to be inappropriate;
(2) As a general policy, names which commemorate the culture and history of Santa Barbara will be given first priority; those names commemorating California history may be given second priority;
(3) The name of an individual shall be considered only if such individual has made a particularly meritorious and outstanding contribution, over a period of several years, to the general public interest or interests of the City;
(4) A preference shall be given to names of long-established local usage, names which are euphonious, and names which lend dignity to the facility, not notoriety, and shall be commensurate with the significance of the facility;
(5) Proliferation of names for different parts of the same facility should be avoided, and the same name should not be applied to a similar kind of facility; (6) Names with connotations which by contemporary community standards are derogatory or offensive shall not be considered.

The Affected Corridor
Calle César Chávez runs between East Gutierrez Street and East Cabrillo Boulevard, a distance of approximately one-half mile. Public Works has conducted an initial assessment of the number of businesses and properties impacted by an address change and has identified 86 unique addresses along the corridor.

Historical Context of the Corridor
At the NAC meeting on May 11, 2026, Mr. Michael Montenegro, Chicano historian and community advocate, presented a historical overview of the street and the surrounding neighborhood, drawing on Street Names of Santa Barbara by Neal Graffy and Chicanos in a Changing Society by Albert Camarillo. The overview traced the corridor from Chumash ancestral territory near the coastal village of Syuxtun, across ground that was salt marsh before the city grid reached it, to the appearance of Calle Salsipuedes on the 1851 Haley Survey Map, Council Agenda Report
Street Name Recommendations for Council Consideration in Renaming Calle César Chávez

Page 4 ends

through the development of Barrio Nuevo and the Salsipuedes neighborhood in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, including the conversion of former marsh and town dump land into Ortega Park and the effects of the 1925 Santa Barbara earthquake, and into the period of United Farm Workers organizing beginning in 1966, El Plan de Santa Barbara in 1969, and the founding of La Casa de La Raza on May 7, 1971.

The corridor has been renamed once before. In 1997, the City Council renamed the lower blocks of Salsipuedes Street, a name that translates loosely as “get out if you can,” to Calle César Chávez in honor of the farm labor organizer, four years after his death. Advocacy for that change was led by community members and organizations including La Casa de La Raza, and a public ceremony was held in September 1997. Local historians objected at the time to altering an original street name, and businesses raised concerns about changing mailing addresses and branded material. A change now would be the second renaming of the same corridor within a single generation.

Recommendation of the Neighborhood Advisory Council
At its meeting of May 11, 2026, following the historical presentation and public testimony, the NAC approved a motion recommending that the City Council rename Calle César Chávez. The recommendation carried after five motions were made over the course of deliberations. The NAC forwarded the following:
(1) Calle Sí Se Puede, as the primary recommendation;
(2) Calle Dolores Huerta, as an alternate of equal weight; and (3) A name to be recommended by the Coastal Band of the Chumash Nation following outreach by the City, as an alternate of equal weight.

The Council is not limited to the names forwarded by the NAC and may select another name, including restoring the corridor to Salsipuedes Street. Each option is discussed below.

Option 1: Calle Sí Se Puede
The phrase “Sí, se puede” was coined by Dolores Huerta in 1972 during a twenty-five day fast in Phoenix, Arizona, protesting state legislation that restricted farmworker organizing. It became the guiding motto of the United Farm Workers and has since been adopted widely across labor, immigrant rights, and civil rights movements. The phrase also has local currency: Sí Se Puede was the title of a Santa Barbara Chicano community publication, and it headlined press coverage of the 1997 renaming of Salsipuedes Street.

Council Agenda Report
Street Name Recommendations for Council Consideration in Renaming Calle César Chávez

Page 5 ends

Because the name commemorates a movement rather than an individual, the individual-merit test in SBMC Section 22.48.020(3) is not engaged. The name is consistent with Section

22.48.020(2) in that it is tied to both Santa Barbara and California history. Two matters require attention before adoption. First, “Sí se puede” is a federally registered trademark of the United Farm Workers. The City Attorney has conducted an initial review on use of the trademark as a public street name to be allowable, but if Council selects this name, outreach to the United Farm Workers would need to confirm this use. Second, staff recommend that Council confirm the treatment of the accent and punctuation so that the name is rendered consistently in City sign standards, County records, and address databases.

Option 2: Calle Dolores Huerta
Dolores Huerta co-founded the National Farm Workers Association in 1962 with César Chávez, the predecessor organization to the United Farm Workers. She served as lead negotiator for the 1970 Delano table grape contracts and directed the national boycott campaigns that preceded them. She coined the phrase “Sí, se puede” in 1972, received the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2012, and founded the Dolores Huerta Foundation.

Because the option names an individual, SBMC Section 22.48.020(3) is engaged and requires that the individual have made a particularly meritorious and outstanding contribution, over a period of several years, to the general public interest or the interests of the City. Council may wish to make findings on the record regarding the local nexus to Santa Barbara, given the first priority accorded by Section 22.48.020(2) to names commemorating the culture and history of Santa Barbara. Ms. Huerta is living, therefore, City staff would reach out to her for consent on use of her name as a public street name.

Option 3: Limuw Street
The corridor lies within Chumash ancestral territory. The Coastal Band of the Chumash Nation is based in Santa Barbara, which it identifies by the Chumash village name Syuxtun. The City has recent precedent for a Chumash street name: in 2020, the Council renamed Indio Muerto Street to Hutash Street at the request of the Barbareño Chumash Tribal Council, with support from multiple Chumash organizations.

Limuw is the Chumash name for what is now called Santa Cruz Island and translates generally as “in the sea” or “in the ocean.” The word is associated with muwu, meaning ocean or a large body of water. Calle César Chávez ends at East Cabrillo Boulevard. If you are standing at the end of the street and looking toward the ocean, it leads directly to Santa Cruz Island.

Council Agenda Report
Street Name Recommendations for Council Consideration in Renaming Calle César Chávez

Page 6 ends

According to a Chumash creation tradition documented by the National Park Service, Limuw is the birthplace of the Chumash people. In the story, Hutash, the Earth Mother, creates the first Chumash people on Limuw. As their population grows, she creates a rainbow bridge from the island to the mainland so that some of the people can establish new communities there. Some fall from the rainbow into the ocean. Hutash transforms them into dolphins, who are consequently regarded as brothers and sisters of the Chumash.

Impact of Businesses and Property Owners
Street numbers would not change; only the street name would change. A property currently addressed at 123 Calle César Chávez would become 123 “new name.” The change would take effect in the form of updated City Street signs and an Address Letter signed by the City Engineer to all affected property owners, with a copy to the City Clerk, County Assessor, County Elections, public utility companies, City Geographic Information Systems, the United States Post Office, and additional private mail carriers. According to the County Registrar of Voters, voter registration information would be updated automatically. Property title and ownership documents should not require amendment, because recorded documents reference a legal description rather than a mailing address, and title companies draw address information from County Assessor rolls.

Residents and businesses would, however, bear an administrative burden. The United States Postmaster for this area has provided the following information regarding implementation:
• It is up to residents and businesses to notify anyone within their own mail network of the street name change.
• The Post Office does not notify any entities, such as the Internal Revenue Service, Social Security Administration, State Franchise Tax Board, or Department of Motor Vehicles, on behalf of residents and businesses located on the affected street. • The Post Office will recognize both the former and new name for one (1) year following the name change, forwarding mail to the new street name during that period, after which it will deliver to the new name only.

Beyond mail, businesses will need to update signage, vehicle lettering, packaging, printed materials, websites and online directory listings, licenses and permits, insurance and banking records, and vendor and customer files. In the past, these costs were borne by the business and were not included in City costs.

Council Agenda Report
Street Name Recommendations for Council Consideration in Renaming Calle César Chávez

Page 7 ends

Neighborhood Engagement
Direct outreach to the impacted neighborhood began the week of August 10, 2026 with a mailed notice followed by City staff going door-to-door to distribute a flyer in advance of a neighborhood meeting that occurred on September 2, 2026. The purpose of the meeting was to inform residents and business owners about the proposed name change, answer their questions, and address any concerns.

There was significant concern shared on the amount of time and expense that would be incurred to facilitate the name change for both residents and business owners. For businesses, this includes business licenses, a contractor's license, invoices, letterhead, checks, business cards, logos, company website, vendor accounts, customer records, insurance records, and banking information, together with online listings including Google Business Profile, Yelp, and mapping services.

The businesses would also separately need to notify vendors, customers, government agencies, licensing agencies, insurance companies, banks, delivery services, and other business contacts. One of the business owners further expressed that customers who have known the business at the same address for years may conclude that it has moved or is a different company, and observed that while any single change is minor, the cumulative effect across the businesses on the corridor is considerable.

There were several comments that highlighted the following:
• Whether the public benefit of renaming a short street that primarily affects businesses is sufficient to justify the cost and disruption. Renaming a street does not change history or undo the actions of people from previous generations, and there were questions where such a process would end if every historical figure's name were subject to removal upon later reevaluation.
• What the current level of community support for the proposal is at this time. Comments acknowledged significant attention to the initial campaign, but in general hearing little recent discussion, and asks the City to determine present support before imposing costs on businesses and taxpayers.
• Whether these are the right resources to spend. Commenters stated that City staff time, taxpayer funds, and the limited resources of local businesses could be directed toward issues with a more immediate impact on the community and asks the Council to reconsider the proposed change.

Council Agenda Report
Street Name Recommendations for Council Consideration in Renaming Calle César Chávez

Page 8 ends

In general, the residents and business owners along the impacted corridor supported a return to Salsipuedes Street or a simple one-name, street name rather than a phrase. There was also a request, especially among business owners that are estimating costs into the thousands of dollars, that Council consider a small business grant program to support businesses in the impacted corridor in facilitating the name change.

Implementation and Next Steps
If Council selects a replacement name, staff will proceed as follows:
(1) Return to Council with a Resolution that sets an effective date allowing sufficient notice of approximately 90 days to residents and businesses;
(2) Public Works finalizes the affected address list and confirms the count of 86 unique addresses;
(3) City Engineer issues an Address Letter to every affected property owner, with copies to the City Clerk, County Assessor, County Elections, public utility companies, City Geographic Information Systems, the United States Post Office, and private mail carriers;
(4) Street signs are replaced along the corridor;
(5) City publishes transition resources for residents and businesses, following the model used for the Hutash Street change; and
(6) A public ceremony commemorates the street name change.

Budget/Financial Information
The incremental cost to the City to replace street signs along the affected corridor is estimated to be approximately $1,500. This estimate covers signage only. As noted under Neighborhood Engagement above, costs incurred by businesses and property owners in updating their own records are not included in this estimate and staff will need direction from Council on whether or not to develop a program to support small businesses in off-setting some of these costs.

Environmental Review
The renaming of Calle Cesar Chavez, an existing facility, is exempt from CEQA under Public Resources Code § 21080(b)(2) and CEQA Guidelines § 15301.

Council Agenda Report
Street Name Recommendations for Council Consideration in Renaming Calle César Chávez

Page 9 ends

Attachment:

1. Letter from Tribal Council for the Coastal Band of the Chumash Nation Prepared by: Barbara Andersen, Senior Assistant to the City Administrator Submitted by: Rene Eyerly, Assistant City Administrator Approved by: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
Coastal Band of the Chumash Nation
P.O. Box 40653
Santa Barbara, CA 93140
September 17, 2026
Mati Waiya
Coastal Band of the Chumash Nation
P.O. Box 40653
Mayor Randy Rowse and Members of the Santa Barbara City Council Eric Friedman, Oscar Gutierrez, Meagan Harmon, Mike Jordan, Wendy Santamaria, Kristen Sneddon City of Santa Barbara
735 Anacapa Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
RE: Support for Renaming Calle Cesar Chavez to Limuw
Dear Mayor Rowse and Members of the City Council,
We write to express our support for renaming Calle Cesar Chavez to Limuw, the Chumash name for Santa Cruz Island. Our island of Limuw is directly visible from the end of that very street, looking out to the channel.

We understand that the City initiated this renaming process following reporting on serious allegations against Cesar Chavez, and that three name options have moved through the community process: Calle Si Se Puede, Calle Dolores Huerta, and a name recommended by the Coastal Band of the Chumash Nation.

We want to be clear about what we are, and are not, asking for.

We are not asking the City to replace one person's name with another. We recognize that nearly 30 years ago, community members fought to rename this portion of Salsipuedes Street to honor the farm worker movement, and we do not wish to erase or diminish that history or the real contributions of farm workers to this region. That legacy matters, and we hope the City finds other lasting ways to honor it, ATTACHMENT 1
Coastal Band of the Chumash Nation
P.O. Box 40653
Santa Barbara, CA 93140
whether through the holiday discussion (March 31) already underway, a plaza, a mural, or another dedicated site.

We are asking for something different: a name that returns to the land itself. Limuw is not a person's name, it cannot carry the weight of any one individual's failings, past or future. It is the name Chumash people have used for Santa Cruz Island for thousands of years, and it points to something that is literally, physically visible from where this street ends. Renaming this street Limuw would connect a daily, lived place in our city to the deep Indigenous history of this region, a history that predates every other name this street has carried, including Salsipuedes.

As Indigenous people, we also stand in solidarity with our farm worker relatives and with all who work on and for the land. That solidarity is part of why we believe this change matters: it does not ask anyone to choose between honoring farm workers and honoring Chumash history. It opens space for both.

Renaming Calle Cesar Chavez to Limuw is an opportunity to bring our communities together, Chumash and Latino, longtime residents and newer neighbors, around a name that looks outward to the land and water that has always been here, rather than inward to any one individual. We respectfully ask the Council to give this option serious weight as the process moves forward.

Thank you for your time and for the thoughtful, community-centered approach the City has taken with this process so far.

Respectfully,
Mati Waiya
Tribal Chair
Coastal Band of the Chumash Nation
[email protected]
(805)794.1248

← All documents from this meeting