Cities Index.
Agenda packet

City Council and Authorities Concurrent
January 11, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
January 11, 2022
Body
City Council and Authorities Concurrent
Pages
38
Original file
27.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santaclara.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

SECTION 2: A new Chapter 10.35 (entitled "Shared Mobility Devices") of Title 10 "Vehicles and Traffic" is added to the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California to read as follows:

Chapter 10.35

SHARED MOBILITY DEVICES

10.35.005 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to protect public health, safety and welfare, including the safety and welfare of seniors, persons with disabilities, and other members of the public traveling by foot, wheelchair or other assistive device, bicycle, or vehicle, on public sidewalks, streets, and other public rights-of-way and to ensure that the use and parking of Shared Mobility Devices in the City do not present a barrier to access to sidewalks and paths of travel for persons with disabilities.

10.35.010 Definitions.

The following words and phrases when used in this chapter shall for the purpose of this chapter have the meanings respectively ascribed to them herein. Whenever any words or phrases used in this chapter are not defined but are defined in the Vehicle Code of the State of California, and any amendments thereto, such definitions shall apply. a) "City Manager" shall mean the City Manager or designee. b) "Fleet" shall mean an inventory of a minimum number of bicycles (including electric bicycles) or motorized scooters required citywide per the Shared Mobility Device Administrative Regulations and managed by an Operator.

II
II
II
Ordinance/Shared Mobility Device Regulation
Rev: 09/2019

Page 2 of 7 ends

c) "Operator" shall mean a person or entity, other than a government entity, that offers, vehicle code makes available, or provides a shared mobility device in exchange for financial compensation or membership via a digital application or other electronic or digital platform.
d) "Permit" shall mean the authorization granted by the City to the Operator to maintain and operate a Fleet within the City.
e) "Shared Mobility Device" shall mean a motorized scooter as defined in Section 407.5 of the Vehicle Code, electric bicycle as defined in Section 312.5 of the Vehicle Code, bicycle as defined in Section 231 of the Vehicle Code, or other similar personal transportation device, except as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 415 of the Vehicle Code, that is made available to the public by a shared mobility operator for shared use and transportation in exchange for financial compensation via a digital application or other electronic or digital platform.
f) "Shared Mobility Device Permit Administrative Regulations" shall mean the Shared Mobility Device Permit Administrative Regulations adopted pursuant to Section

10.35.030.

10.35.020 Permit - Required.

It shall be unlawful for any person or entity to operate a Fleet of Shared Mobility Devices on any public or private property within the City, in exchange for financial compensation or membership via a digital application or other electronic or digital platform, without a current permit issued by the City of Santa Clara.

II
II
Ordinance/Shared Mobility Device Regulation
Rev: 09/2019

Page 3 of 7 ends

10.35.030 Shared Mobility Device Permit Administrative Regulations.

The City Manager shall adopt and update Shared Mobility Device Permit Administrative Regulations as necessary to implement and augment the provisions of this Chapter, including, but not limited to, permit application procedures, permit standards and permit conditions, which may include regulations related to Shared Mobility Device requirements, the ratio of motorized scooters and bicycles, parking, shared parking areas, fleet management and balancing, customer service, maintenance, education and outreach, data sharing, Levi's Stadium and other special events, indemnification, enforcement, grounds for revocation, suspension or denial, permit costs and permit application procedures.

10.35.040 Maximum Number of Shared Mobility Devices Permitted. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this Section, or in the Shared Mobility Device Permit Administrative Regulations, the maximum number of Shared Mobility Devices permitted in the City at any one time shall not exceed 3,000. (b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Manager has the authority to authorize temporary increases in the Citywide maximum of Shared Mobility Devices for special events, such as events at Levi's Stadium or Great America Theme Park.

10.35.050 Enforcement, Impounding and Fines.
(a) Operators shall monitor and manage Shared Mobility Devices in accordance with the parking requirements set forth in the Shared Mobility Device Permit Administrative Regulations. Operators shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Consistent with these laws and regulations, at no time may a parked Shared Mobility Device obstruct a sidewalk, other pedestrian path of travel, or an accessibility feature designed for persons with disabilities.

Ordinance/Shared Mobility Device Regulation
Rev: 09/2019

Page 4 of 7 ends

(b) Operators shall be issued an administrative citation in the amount set forth in subdivision (c) of this section to improperly parked Shared Mobility Devices and for failure to comply with the Shared Mobility Device Administrative Regulations. (c) For each instance where a Shared Mobility Device is not parked in accordance with the Shared Mobility Device Permit Administrative Regulations and the Operator fails to remove or remedy the deficiency within the time specified in these regulations, it shall be considered a single violation for which the Operator is subject to an administrative citation in the following amounts:
( 1) $100 for the first violation
(2) $200 for the second violation
(3) $500 for third and subsequent violations
( d) Any Shared Mobility Devices that are not parked in accordance with the Shared Mobility Permit Administrative Regulations and are not removed or remedied are subject to City impounding and may be taken to a City facility for storage at the Operator's expense. The Operator shall pay an impound fee in an amount set by resolution of the City Council.
(e) Operator shall retrieve impounded Shared Mobility Devices from the City facility within the time specified in the Shared Mobility Device Permit Administrative Regulations, and the Operator's failure to timely retrieve the Shared Mobility Device shall constitute abandonment of the device on public lands and the City may, after written notice is provided, dispose of the property in accordance with the provisions of SCCC 2.105.350 and applicable state law. Furthermore, the City Manager is authorized to suspend or revoke an operator's permit based on failure to retrieve the Shared Mobility Device(s).

Ordinance/Shared Mobility Device Regulation
Rev: 09/2019

Page 5 of 7 ends

(f) The Chief of Police, or designee, shall have the authority to impound Shared Mobility Devices that are not parked in accordance with the Shared Mobility Device Permit Administrative Regulations.

10.35.060 Denial, Suspension, or Revocation of Operating Permit.

The City Manager may deny, suspend, or revoke an Operator's permit based on the grounds specified in the Shared Mobility Device Permit Administrative Regulations including that the operator:
a) Supplied the City Manager with incorrect information in the permit application; b) Violated any conditions placed upon the permit; or
c) Otherwise failed to comply with the provisions of this chapter or any rules or regulations promulgated by the City Manager pursuant to this chapter.

10.35.065 Appeal of Permit Decisions.

The decision of the City Manager to deny, suspend, or revoke a Permit under this Chapter may be appealed under the procedures set forth in Chapter 2.115.

10.35.070 Prohibited Conduct.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, no person shall fail to comply with the Administrative Regulations or any provision of this Chapter. Any violation of any Administrative Regulation or this Chapter shall constitute a violation of this Code.

II
II
II
II
II
Ordinance/Shared Mobility Device Regulation
Rev: 09/2019

Page 6 of 7 ends

SECTION 3: Savings clause. The changes provided for in this ordinance shall not affect any offense or act committed or done or any penalty or forfeiture incurred or any right established or accruing before the effective date of this ordinance; nor shall it affect any prosecution, suit or proceeding pending or any judgment rendered prior to the effective date of this ordinance. All fee schedules shall remain in force until superseded by the fee schedules adopted by the City Council.

SECTION 4: Environmental Determination. This Ordinance does not constitute a "project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) in that it is governmental organization or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment.

SECTION 5: Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its final adoption; however, prior to its final adoption it shall be published in accordance with the requirements of Section 808 and 812 of "The Charter of the City of Santa Clara, California." PASSED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PUBLICATION this 7th day of December 2021, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILORS:

NOES: COUNCILORS:

ABSENT: COUNCILORS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS:

Attachments incorporated by reference:

Becker, Chahal, Hardy, Jain, Park, and Watanabe,
and Mayor Gillmor
None
None
None
ATTEST: ~L

NORA PIMENTEL , MMC

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA

1. DRAFT Shared Mobility Device Permit Administrative Regulations Ordinance/Shared Mobility Device Regulation
Rev: 09/2019

Page 7 of 7 ends

City of Santa Clara
DRAFT Shared Mobility
Device Permit
Administrative Regulations
November 10, 2021
Santa Clara
Purpose and Authority
Shared Mobility Device Permit
DRAFT Administrative Regulations
Chapter 10.35 of the Santa Clara City Code sets forth the requirements and procedures for permits issued for the operation of Shared Mobility Devices in the City of Santa Clara. These regulations implement the provisions of Chapter 10.35 and are issued by the City Manager or Designee under the authorization granted by Section 10.35.030 of the Code . These regulations are not intended to be exhaustive and may be amended at any time by the City Manager.

These regulations shall be referred to as the "Shared Mobility Device Permit Administrative Regulations."
Definitions
The definitions set for in Chapter 10.35, and herein, shall govern the application and interpretation of these regulations .

Permit Requirements
The following requirements shall be incorporated into the Terms and Conditions of all Shared Mobility Device permits issued. By submitting an application, Operator agrees to comply with all requirements, unless a specific modification is noted in the application and approved by the City Manager in writing prior to issuance of permit.

Permit Issuance

1. Permit application period will be from February 1 to March 31 each year.

2. Permit will be valid for a one-year period, from July 1 to June 30.

3. The City Manager will review permit applications and issue permits by June 1.

4. Based on the content of the Permit Application , the City Manager may select up to three operators to grant permits based on criteria described in "Permit Application Contents " section.

Shared Mobility Device Requirements

1. All Shared Mobility Devices shall have, and clearly display, a unique, permanent identification number.

2. All Shared Mobility Devices shall be equipped with global positioning system (GPS) tracking or other similar means of continuously tracking locations of such Shared Mobility Devices .

3. All Shared Mobility Devices shall clearly display the operator's business name, customer service phone number, and email address. Information shall also be provided in Braille on each Shared Mobility Device .

4. All Shared Mobility Devices shall include headlights, taillights, reflectors, and comply with applicable California State Law, including the California Vehicle Code, and industry standards.
1 Santa Clara Shared Mobility Device Permit
DRAFT Administrative Regulations

5. Operator shall provide a description of Mobility Device capabilities that will assist user in complying with state law, including the California Vehicle Code, regarding maximum scooter operating speeds and prohibited operation on sidewalks. Each Operator will be required to deploy "Geofencing" or other technology capable of preventing the use of Shared Mobility Devices or to limit the maximum speed of Shared Mobility Devices in designated areas of the City.

Parking
2 1. Operators will ensure that users of the Shared Mobility Devices including the Operator's agents responsible for fleet management and rebalancing are informed of all applicable laws and regulations, and the following parking rules and limitations, and ensure that users comply with these limitations .

2. All Shared Mobility Devices shall be upright when parked .

3. All Shared Mobility Devices shall not be parked in such a manner as to block or obstruct access to public facilities included but not limited to the following :
• Pedestrian Clear Zone area of the sidewalk (The "Pedestrian Clear Zone" area of the sidewalk or pedestrian path of travel is defined as the area within the 48 inches of clear space on the sidewalk or pedestrian path for pedestrian travel.) • Any fire hydrant, call box, or other emergency facility (minimum 36-inch clearance)
• Rail platforms, bus benches, bus stops, bus shelters, and passenger waiting areas, except at existing bicycle racks or designated parking areas for Shared Mobility Devices (minimum 36-inch clearance)
• Utility poles or boxes (minimum 36-inch clearance)
• All on- or off-street vehicle parking spaces (minimum 36-inch clearance to curb face), including but not limited to:
i. Disabled parking zones
ii. Loading zones
iii. Time Limited Parking zones
• Street furniture that requires pedestrian access, for example benches, receptacles, etc. (minimum 36-inch clearance)
• Areas within 15 feet of Curb ramps
• Areas within 10 feet of entryways, exits, and driveways • Vehicular traffic lanes including bicycle lanes and associated buffers

4. When a sidewalk includes a "furniture zone", Shared Mobility Devices shall be parked within the furniture zone . When a sidewalk lacks a "furniture zone", Shared Mobility Devices must not be parked in a way to deny meaningful access to City sidewalks and paths of travel for persons with disabilities. Towards this end, each Operator must give notice and training to the User and ensure that Shared Mobility Devices are parked so that (a) 48-inch clear spaces are provided on pedestrian rights-of-way, and (b) curb ramps, entryways, exits, and other accessible paths of travel are never blocked or Santa Clara Shared Mobility Device Permit
DRAFT Administrative Regulations
3 obstructed. "Furniture zone" shall refer to that section of the sidewalk between the curb and the pedestrian through zone in which street furniture and public amenities, such as lighting, benches, newspaper kiosks, utility poles, tree wells and bicycle racks are provided.

5. Any Shared Mobility Device that is parked incorrectly shall be reparked in a correct manner or shall be removed within two hours after Operator's customer service team receives notice of the report. The operator will be notified about parking violations directly through customer service communication via contact information provided on each Shared Mobility Device. In addition, City staff will forward notifications to operators during staffing hours that are received from the public, including but not limited to, through the City's My Santa Clara mobile application.

6. Operator must provide a feature within its mobile application that requires a user of a Shared Mobility Device to upload a photograph, or utilize other technology, to ensure the Shared Mobility Device is not obstructing the pedestrian pathway at the end of each ride.

7. Operator shall not place or attach any personal property, fixtures or structures to City property without the prior written consent of City including applicable permits.

8. Operator shall coordinate with, and obtain written approval from, the City Manager for all marked designated parking areas throughout the City.

9. Operator shall not deploy Shared Mobility Devices or install parking on private property without the consent of the property owner.

10. Designated on-street parking areas may be established at selected locations after review and approval by the City Manager.

11. Operator shall obtain an encroachment permit for any installation of infrastructure, signing or striping in the public right-of-way.

12. Operator shall be responsible for installation and removal of all approved infrastructure, signing and striping.

13. The City Manager reserves the right to designate "priority parking areas" in coordination with property owners. The purpose of these priority parking areas is to provide parking at designated locations within or adjacent to commercial centers and other destinations.
• Operators shall be responsible for the cost of installation and maintenance of any necessary infrastructure, including construction of the new designated shared parking areas. These costs shall be shared equally among the Operators. • For any priority parking area, all operators that are issued a Shared Mobility Device permit shall have a plan for deployment of Shared Mobility Devices at the designated shared parking areas. The designated shared parking areas may be located at any of the following locations:

1. Related Project (future)

2. AMC Mercado

3. Santa Clara Square

4. Rivermark

5. Santa Clara Convention Center

6. Lawrence Station Area
Santa Clara Shared Mobility Device Permit
DRAFT Administrative Regulations

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

Great America Theme Park
Levi's Stadium
Central Park Library
City Hall
Great America Train Station
Santa Clara Station
Santa Clara University
Mission College
Fleet Management and Balancing
4 1. Each Operator must provide a minimum of 60 shared mobility devices, whichever is applicable, to ensure service availability. The minimum number of Shared Mobility Devices may be amended by the City Manager.

2. The total size of the citywide fleet shall not exceed 3,000 Shared Mobility Devices with up to 1,000 bicycles (including electric bicycles) and 2,000 motorized scooters.

Following the review of shared mobility permit applications, the number of Shared Mobility Devices will be allocated equally among the Operators based on the number of Operators that are permitted to operate Shared Mobility Devices and the number of Shared Mobility Devices desired for deployment by each permitted Operator. The City Manager has the discretion to periodically adjust the City-wide maximum number of Shared Mobility Devices.

3. Each operator must deploy 5% of the total number of Shared Mobility Devices in an area designated as an Equity Priority Community (formerly referred to as Community of Concern) as defined by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

4. All Shared Mobility Devices parked in a low-density residential zone shall be moved by the Operator out of the residential zone within 72 hours.

5. Any improperly parked Shared Mobility Devices that are not removed within 2 hours of notification of the Operator may be impounded and taken to a City facility for storage at the Operator's expense. Operator shall be required to pay the impounding fee.

6. Operator shall be responsible for retrieving the impounded Shared Mobility Devices from the city facility. Failure to retrieve Shared Mobility Devices from the city facility within two working days of notification of impoundment shall constitute abandonment of the property and the City may, after written notice is provided, dispose of the property in accordance with the surplus property provisions of the City Code.

Furthermore, failure to retrieve the Shared Mobility Device(s) may lead to permit suspension or revocation.

7. Shared Mobility Devices must be re-parked/re-distributed daily to ensure compliance with the regulations and the Operator's plan of operation.

8. Operators shall ensure that users do not operate Shared Mobility Devices in City parks. Operators shall use geofencing or equivalent technology to prevent Shared Mobility Devices from being operated in City parks excluding the San Tomas Aquino/Saratoga Creek Trail. A complete list of City parks is available on the City's website at:

Santa Clara Shared Mobility Device Permit
DRAFT Administrative Regulations
http://missionci ty.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Map Tour/index . html?appid=4c84d4f8913541 c ebd8a8ef3fc31 a326&amp .

Customer Service

1. Operator shall maintain a 24-hour customer service telephone number with live operators for customers and members of the public to report safety concerns, complaints, or to ask questions . The customer service number shall be clearly displayed on all Shared Mobility Devices in service .

2. Operator shall provide options for customer service inquiries to be submitted via email and text message.

3. Operators shall provide email, text message or phone confirmation of any issues reported to originator if requested and follow up with the originator with status updates as appropriate .

4. Any Shared Mobility Device that is parked improperly (as described in "Parking" section above) shall be re-parked in a correct manner or shall be removed within two hours after notice has been provided to Operator.

5. Operator shall maintain a multilingual (English, Spanish and Chinese) website, call center and mobile app customer interface that are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

6. Mobile apps and other customer service interface technology must be fully accessible to persons with disabilities and must comply with Section 508 of the United States Workforce Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

Maintenance

1. Operator must ensure that all Shared Mobility Devices are in good working order, are clean, free of graffiti, and are safe to operate.

2. Any Shared Mobility Device that is reported by the City or any third party to be damaged, deficient, or otherwise unsafe to operate shall be immediately assessed and/or remotely disabled, as appropriate.

3. Any Shared Mobility Device that is reported to be damaged, deficient, or otherwise unsafe to operate shall be checked in person and removed within two hours after notice has been provided to Operator.

4. Operator must maintain a record of all maintenance performed for each Shared Mobility Device and make such record available to the City upon request.

Education and Outreach
5 1. Operator agrees to provide notice to users regarding federal, state and local laws applicable to riding, operating and parking a Shared Mobility Devices in the City, and to require users to acknowledge and comply with all of these applicable laws, including laws relating to accessibility , helmets, age, parking, driver's license requirements, Santa Clara Shared Mobility Device Permit
DRAFT Administrative Regulations
sidewalk riding, speed limits, use of bike lanes and streets where Shared Mobility Devices can operate with and without bike lanes, and other rules of the road.

2. Operator shall provide multiple public outreach/safety education events throughout the area of operation within the City including a kickoff event prior to deployment of the Shared Mobility Devices. City permit approval and costs associated with public outreach/safety education events shall be the responsibility of the operator .

3. Operator agrees to notify users by means of signage or visible language on Shared Mobility Devices as well as through its website and mobile applicat ions that:
a) All State of California laws shall be obeyed while riding a Shared Mobility Device, including laws related to age, driver's license requirements , and speed b) Shared Mobility Devices may not be used on sidewalks, and generally shall be operated as close as practicable to the right curb of any street except as otherwise specified in state law.
c) At no time may a parked Shared Mobility Device obstruct a sidewalk, other pedestrian path of travel, or an accessibility feature designed for persons with disabilities.

Data Sharing
6 1. Operator agrees to provide the City with access to an Application Programming Interface (API) offering data about its fleet and all trip activity within the City, meeting the current requirements of the Mobility Data Specification (MOS) format developed by the Los Angeles Department of Transportation. This specification is detailed at:
https://github .com/CityOflosAngeles/mobility-data-specification

1. Operator agrees to provide City with access to a dashboard providing comprehensive anonymized data about the origins, destinations , distances , vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and times of all trip activity related to Shared Mobility Devices deployed in the City, as well as aggregate data and heat maps categorized by vehicle type and allowing analysis by day, week, or month, at no cost to the city.

2. Operator agrees to make real-time open data on system status and usage available in General Bike Share Feed Specification (GBFS) format.

3. In addition to the data required by the GBFS and MOS specifications, Operator shall provide a report of the following data on a monthly basis (or more frequently, if requested by the City Manager) :
a) Timestamped records of maintenance activities including device ID and maintenance performed .
b) Timestamped records of customer service inquiry including nature of issue, time reported, and time resolved.
c) Collision data received from users.
d) Data related to age of members , low-income program membership, and the number of members divided by residents, surrounding area residents, and visitors from out of the area.
e) Operators shall survey users every 6 months subsequently to provide information to the City for future planning, including asking questions about what mode of transportation was replaced for the use of a Shared Mobility Device. Survey Santa Clara Shared Mobility Device Permit
DRAFT Administrative Regulations
questions shall be consistent among Operators and determined in coordination with the City Manager.

4. Operator agrees to not sell or share confidential user data.

Membership and Enrollment

1. Operator agrees to comply with all relevant state and local regulations regarding age limits for use of Shared Mobility Devices .

2. Operator agrees to conduct outreach and to implement technology-based measures to verify ages of members during enrollment via mobile app and/or website.

3. Operator shall establish a low-income discount program that offers discounted memberships to individuals at or below 200% of the federal poverty level.

Membership in public assistance programs such as SNAP , CalFresh, or Silicon Valley Power Rate Assistance Program (SVP RAP) may be used for discount eligibility, or some other metric consistent with this requirement and approved by the City Manager.

Levi's Stadium and Special Events

1. The maximum number of Shared Mobility Devices permitted in the City at any one time may not apply on Levi's Stadium and other large special event days at the Great America Theme Park. The City Manager may adopt a maximum cap for event days after review of Shared Mobility Device data.

2. The City Manager may implement operating procedures or prohibit use of devices specific to Levi's Stadium and Special Events .

3. Special event days will be identified on the City's Shared Mobility webpage.

Operator shall comply with the number of permitted units by midnight of the second day following the event.

4. Operators shall comply with current and future requirements of the Levi's Stadium Transportation Management and Operations Plan (TMOP).

Performance Bond
7 1. Operator shall maintain in effect at all times a valid performance bond in the amount of $20,000 during the term of the annual permit starting with permit issuance.

2. The performance bond may be used for any public property repair and maintenance costs that may be incurred as a result of operator's Shared Mobility Devices, as well as removal and storage of Shared Mobility Devices that are not addressed within specified timeframes. The performance bond may be used to cover staff time associated with performing or facilitating these activities.

3. The performance bond may be used for any unpaid fines for violations issued to the Operator.

Santa Clara Shared Mobility Device Permit
DRAFT Administrative Regulations

4. The performance bond may be used for any future costs incurred by the City related to the Shared Mobility permits.

Enforcement
Enforcement is designed to promote and achieve compliance with local law and the program guidelines. The Operators shall be required to pay fines per the schedule below related to improperly parked devices and failure to comply with the regulations .

1. Any improperly parked Shared Mobility Devices that are not removed or remedied within two (2) hours of providing notice to Operator may be impounded and taken to a City facility for storage at the Operator's expense. The Operator shall be required to pay the impounding fee.

2. In addition to the impounding fee, the Operator shall be cited for failure to remove the Shared Mobility Devices within two (2) hours of providing notice. The citation amount is listed in City Code 10.35.050.

3. Operator shall be responsible for retrieving the impounded devices from the City facility .

Failure to retrieve Shared Mobility Devices from the City facility within two (2) working days of notification of impoundment may lead to disposal of the equipment and permit suspension or revocation.

Denial , Suspension , or Revocation of Operating Permit 8 1. An Operator 's permit may be denied, suspended or revoked at the discretion of the City Manager based on any of the following grounds:
a) Consistent failure to address parking violations.
b) Failure to retrieve Shared Mobility Devices from the city facility within two (2) working days of notification of impoundment.
c) Transfer of an Operator permit to another party, including company mergers, without written approval by the City Manager.
d) The operator sells or shares confidential user data. e) An applicant or Operator including its employees, managers , officers, principals, directors, owners, contractors, representatives, or agents has:
• One or more false or misleading statements or material omissions on the permit application, during the application process.
• Failed to provide information requested or required by the City • Operated or has proposed to operate in a manner that endangers public health or safety.
• Failed to comply with any requirement imposed by the provisions of these regulations or the City Code, including any rule, regulation, conditions or standard adopted pursuant to the Ordinance, or any term or condition imposed on the permit for the operation of Shared Mobility Devices, or any provision of California law.
• Conviction of the Operator, to include any of its officer, owners or principals, of Santa Clara Shared Mobility Device Permit
DRAFT Administrative Regulations
a criminal offense that is substantially related to the qualifications, functions or duties of the shared business or profession, including , but not limited to, any criminal conviction involving a violent or serious felony, fraud, deceit, or embezzlement.

2. If an Operator's permit is suspended or revoked during the annual permit period, the Operator shall be required to remove all devices deployed in the City at the Operator's cost. If Operator does not remove the devices within five (5) working days of notification of permit suspension or revocation, the City shall have the authority to remove the Shared Mobility Devices at Operator's cost and use the Performance Bond to cover the cost of removal of the Operator 's devices.

3. If an Operator's permit is suspended, the minimum permit suspension period will be two (2) weeks. The Operator shall be required to provide a plan for corrective actions to demonstrate ability to comply with the regulations for resumption of the Operating permit. Any time spent by City staff on meeting with Operators to facilitate permit resumption will be reimbursed by the Operator on a time and materials basis.

Permit Costs
9 1. Application Fee: The applicant must pay the "Shared Mobility Device Permit, Application Fee" as identified in the latest City of Santa Clara Adopted Municipal Fee Schedule. The fee is non-refundable. Any application submitted without this fee shall be considered incomplete . The City will not accept or review any application that is submitted without payment of this fee.

2. Permit Fee: If the City approves the permit application, the applicant must pay ari "Shared Mobility Device Permit, Annual Fee" as identified in the latest City of Santa Clara Adopted Municipal Fee Schedule. The City will not issue the permit until this fee is paid.

3. Device Fee: The applicant must pay a "Shared Mobility Device Permit, Device Fee" as identified in the latest City of Santa Clara Adopted Municipal Fee Schedule . The first 60 Shared Mobility Devices deployed per Operator will not be subject to this per­ device fee. The City will not issue the permit until this fee is paid. If capacity exists, the applicant may apply to increase the number of devices deployed in the City after December 1 of the permit operating period. The applicant must then pay a "Shared Mobility Device Permit, Additional Device Fee" as identified in the latest City of Santa Clara Adopted Municipal Fee Schedule

4. lmpoundment Fee: The applicant must pay a "Shared Mobility Device Permit, lmpoundment Fee" as identified in the latest City of Santa Clara Adopted Municipal Fee Schedule to release a device from impoundment.

5. Operator shall also obtain a business license to operate in the City of Santa Clara.

6. All fees are non-refundable.

Santa Clara Shared Mobility Device Permit
DRAFT Administrative Regulations
Permit Application Contents
10 1. A description of the proposed plan of operation, including, at a minimum, the applicant's plan to comply with the Administrative Regulations including Shared Mobility Device requirements , parking compliance, planned parking locations, fleet management and balancing, customer service, maintenance , data sharing, Levi's Stadium and other special events;

2. A detailed plan for the number and description of outreach and safety education events.

Plan shall specify if events will be virtual or in-person. In-person events shall include proposed locations and if events will be stand-alone events or part of other community events/festivals. Operator shall include plan to advertise events.

3. Description of the number and mix of Shared Mobility Device that will be deployed:
motorized scooters, bicycles, electric bicycles;

4. Shared Mobility Device capabilities including geofencing and other technology to comply with parking, speeding, and path of travel regulations.

5. A map of the proposed deployment area and parking locations.

6. The applicant's experience and demonstrated ability to comply with regulations in other jurisdictions;

7. The applicant's regulatory compliance program;

8. The applicant's history of and ability to comply with state and local law;

9. Any other requirements set forth by the Administrative Regulations.

Santa Clara
Attachment 1: Indemnification and Insurance
11 Shared Mobility Device Permit
DRAFT Administrative Regulations
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-45 Agenda Date: 1/11/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Action to Waive Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2040 to Amend Chapter 2.120, Entitled Boards and Commissions, to Update Boards and Commission Members Qualifications

COUNCIL PILLAR
Enhance Community Engagement and Transparency

BACKGROUND
At the December 14, 2021 Council meeting, proposed Ordinance No. 2040 was introduced and passed for the purpose of publication. Pursuant to City Charter Sections 808 and 812, proposed Ordinance No. 2040 was published on January 5, 2022, and copies were posted in three public places. The Ordinance now comes to Council for final adoption.

DISCUSSION
The proposed ordinance will amend SCCC Section 2.120.010, to allow residents that are 18 years of age to serve as members of the City’s non-charter Boards, Commissions and Committees. This ordinance will eliminate the current requirement that all members of non-Charter Boards and Commissions be qualified electors of the City.

However, City Charter Commissions, which include Planning, Parks and Recreation, Civil Service, and Board of Library Trustees, will continue to require members to be a qualified electors of the City.

The Charter Commission qualifications may only be revised by Charter amendment which will require a ballot measure.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action being considered does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) in that it is a governmental organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact with the adoption of this ordinance.

COORDINATION
This report was coordinated with the City Attorney’s Office and City Clerk’s Office

PUBLIC CONTACT
A summary of proposed Ordinance No. 2040 was published to the Santa Clara Weekly on January 5, 2022, and copies were posted in three public places and made available for public inspection at City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/6/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
22-45 Agenda Date: 1/11/2022
the City Clerk’s Office.

Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City’s official-notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting. A hard copy of any agenda report may be requested by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 615-2220, email [email protected].

RECOMMENDATION
Waive Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2040 to amend Chapter 2.120, entitled Boards and Commissions, to update Boards and Commissions qualifications to be residents of the City instead of qualified electors.

Reviewed by: Elizabeth Klotz, Assistant City Attorney
Approved by: Deanna J. Santana, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Ordinance No. 2040 (Introduction)
City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/6/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
ORDINANCE NO. 2040

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.120.010 ("NAMES,

MEMBERSHIP, QUALIFICATIONS, AND TERMS OF
OFFICE"), TO REQUIRE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

MEMBERS TO BE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY INSTEAD OF

QUALIFIED ELECTORS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Clara desires to remove barriers that prevent active participation by all City residents in City Government; WHEREAS, the City Council desires for greater participation by and inclusion of all residents within the City of Santa Clara; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the removal of the requirement that Boards and Commission members be a "qualified elector" of the City. Instead, Board and Commission members will be required to be a resident of the City.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: That Section 2.120.010 (entitled "Names, membership, qualifications and terms of office") of Chapter 2.120 (entitled "Boards and Commissions") of Title 2 (entitled "Administration and Personnel") of "The Code of the City of Santa Clara, California" ("SCCC") is amended to read as follows:
"2.120.010 Names, membership, qualifications and terms of office.

There shall be and there is established within the City the following boards and commissions:

II
II
Ordinance/Boards and Commission Members Qualifications
Rev: 09/2019

Page 1 of 3 ends

(a) Planning Commission. (SCCC 2.120.050)
(b) Parks and Recreation Commission. (SCCC 2.120.060)
(c) Civil Service Commission. (SCCC 2.120.070)
(d) Board of Library Trustees. (SCCC 2.120.080)
(e) Historical and Landmarks Commission. (SCCC 2.120.100) (f) Senior Advisory Commission. (SCCC 2.120.110)
(g) Youth Commission. (SCCC 2.120.130)
(h) Cultural Commission. (SCCC 2.120.140)
(i) International Exchange Commission. (SCCC 2.120.150) U) Housing Commission. (SCCC 2.12.160)
All members of boards, commissions, and committees, except for members of the Youth Commission, shall be 18 years of age or older and residents of the City. All members of boards and commissions established by City Charter (i.e., Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Civil Service Commission and Board of Library Trustees) shall also be qualified electors of the City."
SECTION 2: Ordinances Repealed. With exception of the provisions protected by the savings clause, all ordinances (or parts of ordinances) in conflict with or inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed.

II
II
II
II
II
Ordinance/Boards and Commission Members Qualifications
Rev: 09/2019

Page 2 of 3 ends

SECTION 3: Savings clause. The changes provided for in this ordinance shall not affect any offense or act committed or done or any penalty or forfeiture incurred or any right established or accruing before the effective date of this ordinance; nor shall it affect any prosecution, suit or proceeding pending or any judgment rendered prior to the effective date of this ordinance. All fee schedules shall remain in force until superseded by the fee schedules adopted by the City Council.

SECTION 4: Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its final adoption ; however, prior to its final adoption it shall be published in accordance with the requirements of Section 808 and 812 of "The Charter of the City of Santa Clara, California."
PASSED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PUBLICATION this 14th day of December 2021, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILORS: Becker, Chahal, Hardy, Jain, Park, and Watanabe, and Mayor Gillmor
NOES: COUNCILORS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILORS: None
ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS : None
ATTEST:

Attachments incorporated by reference : None
Ordinance/Boards and Commission Members Qualifications
Rev: 09/2019

NORA PIMENTE , M C

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA

Page 3 of 3 ends

City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-46 Agenda Date: 1/11/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Action to Waive Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2039 Amending Chapter 13.10 “Sewers” of Title 13 “Public Services” of the City of Santa Clara Code to Modify Regulations Regarding Pretreatment Programs to Conform with Recent Updates to the Regional Wastewater Facility Requirements

COUNCIL PILLAR
Deliver and Enhance High-Quality Efficient Services and Infrastructure

BACKGROUND
At the December 14, 2022 Council meeting, proposed Ordinance No. 2039 was introduced and passed for the purpose of publication. Pursuant to City Charter Sections 808 and 812, proposed Ordinance No. 2039 was published on January 5, 2022, and copies were posted in three public places. The Ordinance now comes to Council for final adoption.

DISCUSSION
The City of Santa Clara is a co-owner of the San José-Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility (RWF) with the City of San José, who acts as the administrator of the facility. As administrator, San José ensures compliance with discharge requirements under the federal National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. Included in those requirements are water quality standards for the discharge into water bodies that were originally established by the 1972 Federal Clean Water Act.

Discharging facilities such as the RWF are required to establish Pretreatment Programs that ensure that treated wastewater is free of regulated pollutants in order to protect public health and the environment, including the health of San Francisco Bay.

The Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency (the state and federal agencies responsible for administering the NPDES permit program) made certain recommendations for the Pretreatment Program in an April 2019 audit. On June 3, 2021, San José amended chapter 15.14 of its municipal code to adopt those recommendations. The changes are largely of a technical nature, and include adding or editing defined terms, permit and reporting requirements, as well as administrative penalties and enforcement provisions. Staff proposes to amend Santa Clara Code Chapter 13.10 to conform with San José’s changes as referenced in the proposed ordinance (Attachment 1).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Council action on this item is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines, actions taken by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment.

City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/6/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
22-46 Agenda Date: 1/11/2022

FISCAL IMPACT
The amendment to Santa Clara City Code does not have a fiscal impact other than City staff time.

COORDINATION
This report was coordinated with the City Attorney’s Office.

PUBLIC CONTACT
A summary of proposed Ordinance No. 2039 was published to the Santa Clara Weekly on January 5, 2022, and copies were posted in three public places and made available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office.

Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City’s official-notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting. A hard copy of any agenda report may be requested by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 615-2220, email [email protected].

RECOMMENDATION
Waive Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2039 amending City of Santa Clara Code Chapter

13.10 (Sewers) of Title 13 “Public Services” of the City of Santa Clara Code to modify regulations regarding pretreatment programs to conform with recent updates to the Regional Wastewater Facility Requirements.

Reviewed by: Caio Arellano, Assistant City Attorney
Approved by: Deanna J. Santana, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Ordinance No. 2039 (Introduction)
City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/6/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
ORDINANCE NO. 2039

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 13.10 "SEWERS" OF
TITLE 13 "PUBLIC SERVICES" OF "THE CODE OF THE
CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA" REGARDING

PROGRAMS AND REGULATIONS FOR WASTEWATER

PRETREATMENT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, The City of Santa Clara is a co-owner of the San Jose-Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility (RWF) with the City of San Jose, who acts as the administrator of the facility;
WHEREAS, as the RWF administrator, San Jose ensures compliance with discharge requirements under the federal National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. Included in those requirements are water quality standards for the discharge into water bodies that were originally established by the 1972 Federal Clean Water Act; WHEREAS, discharging facilities such as the RWF are required to establish pretreatment programs that ensure that treated wastewater is free of regulated pollutants in order to protect public health and the environment, including the health of San Francisco Bay; and, WHEREAS, pretreatment programs and regulations applicable to users of the City of Santa Clara's sewer collection system are codified in Santa Clara City Code Chapter 13.10 and the regulatory agencies responsible for administering the RWF's NPDES permit have recommended various changes to the pretreatment regulations.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

II
II
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.1 O "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 1 of 38 ends

SECTION 1: That subsection (a) of Section 13.10.020 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 ( entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"(a) "A" definitions:
( 1) "Amalgam separator" means a device that: employs filtration, settlement, centrifugation, or ion exchange to remove dental amalgam and its metal constituents from a dental office vacuum system before it discharges to the sanitary sewer; has been certified under the International Organization for Standardization's standard for amalgam separators as capable of removing a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%) of dental amalgam at flow rates comparable to the flow rate of the actual vacuum suction system in operation; and does not have any automatic flow bypass. (2) "Ammonia" means the form of nitrogen that is chemically definable as NH3.
(3) "Audit protocols" means the procedures to be followed in performing flow and pollutant audit studies.
(4) "Authorized or Duly Authorized Representative of the User" means:
(A) For a corporation:
(i) The president, secretary, treasurer, or a vice-
president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the corporation; or (ii) The manager of one or more manufacturing,
production, or operating facilities if the following criteria are met:

II
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 2 of 38 ends

a. The manager is authorized to make
management decisions that govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long-term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations;
b. The manager can ensure that the
necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for individual wastewater discharge permit requirements; and c. The manager has the assigned or
delegated authority to sign documents in accordance with corporate procedures. (B) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: a general partner or proprietor, respectively.
(C) For a Federal, State, or local governmental facility: a director or highest official appointed or designated to oversee the operation and performance of the activities of the government facility, or their designee. (D) The individuals described in paragraphs A through C, above, may designate a Duly Authorized Representative in writing, specifying the individualor position responsible for the overall operation of the facility from which the discharge originates or having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company, and submitting the authorization to the Director.

II
II
II
II
Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 3 of 38 ends

(5) "Average concentration" means the concentration of a pollutant in an industrial user's discharge that is calculated by adding the concentrations of the particular pollutant in all composite samples taken during a given time period, including, but not limited to, self-monitoring samples, and dividing the total by the number of samples taken."
SECTION 2: That subsection (b) of Section 13.10.020 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"(b) "B" definitions:
(1) "Baseline Monitoring Report" means a report which shall include all requirements of federal regulation, including but not limited to 40 CFR 403.12(b), and:
(A) For New Sources and sources that become Industrial
Users subsequent to the promulgation of an applicable categorical standard, submitted at least ninety (90) days prior to commencement of discharge and contain identifying information, environmental permits in place, a description of operations, flow measurements, measurements of pollutants, and the pretreatment a New Source intends to use to meet the applicable standards, including estimates of measurements; (B) For existing Industrial Users, submitted within one hundred eighty (180) days after the effective date of a categorical Pretreatment Standard, or after the final administrative decision, and shall contain, at a minimum, identifying information, environmental permits in place, a description of operations, flow measurements, a measurement of pollutants, proper certification, and a compliance schedule as necessary."
Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 4 of 38 ends

(2) "Batch discharge" means the discharge of wastewater resulting from an intermittent treatment process in which an identified amount of process wastewateris collected, treated to meet discharge standards, and released to the sanitary sewer system. (3) "Best management practices" means schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices, such as, standard operating procedures, general good housekeeping, or pollution prevention practices to prevent or reduce the introduction of pollutants to either the sanitary sewer or storm drain system that have been determined by the Director to be cost- effective for particular industry groups, business types, or specific industrial processes. Best Management Practices may also include approved alternative means (e.g., management plans) of complying with federal, state or local regulations. (4) "Biochemical oxygen demand" means the quantity of oxygen expressed in parts per million (ppm) by weight, utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter under standard laboratory conditions for five days at a temperature of twenty degrees centigrade (20° C)."
SECTION 3: That subsection (c) of Section 13.10.020 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"(c) "C" definitions:
(1) "Categorical industrial user" or "CIU" means a source performing any categorical process subject to Federal pretreatment standards, as described in 40 CFR Sections 405 through 471, as amended from time to time, that has any connection to the sanitary sewer system.

Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 5 of 38 ends

(2) "Categorical pretreatment standard" or "categorical standard" means any regulation containing pollutant discharge limits promulgated by EPA that apply to specific categories of users and which appear in 40 CFR Sections 405 through 471, as amended from time to time.
(3) "Clean Water Act" is the 1972 amendment to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. Section 1251 et seq. The Act is the primary legislation concerning water pollution and its regulation. The Act establishes a permit system that must be used by point sources of pollution such as industrial facilities, government facilities, and agricultural operations. These point sources are not allowed to discharge or dispose of the pollutants they produce in surface water without a permit from the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).
(4) "Code of Federal Regulations" (or "CFR") refers to the Code of Federal Regulations as published by the Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration. Whenever a reference is made to any portion of the CFR, or to any other Federal regulation, such reference shall apply to all amendments and additions to such portion of said regulations now or hereinafter enacted. (5) "Composite sample" means a flow-proportional or time- proportional sample, which accurately represents the average pollutant concentration discharged during a continuous time period. A composite sample may be obtained manually or automatically, and it may be taken discretely or continuously. For manual composite sampling, at least six individual samples from each sample point shall be combined and mixed to obtain one composite sample; flow-proportion may be obtained either by varying the time interval between each discrete sample or the volume of each discrete sample.

Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 6 of 38 ends

(6) "Continuous discharge" means a discharge which occurs without interruption throughout the operating hours of the facility, except for infrequent shutdowns for maintenance, process changes, or other similar activities. (7) "Critical user" means a discharger whose wastewater contains priority pollutants, or who discharges any waste which has the potential to cause interference in concentration above those allowed in this chapter and/or who discharges in excess of one hundred thousand (100,000) gallons per day." SECTION 4: That subsection (d) of Section 13.10.020 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"(d) "D" definitions:
( 1) "Dental amalgam" means an alloy of mercury with another metal used by dentists to fill cavities in teeth.
(2) "Diluting waters" means noncontact cooling water, boiler blowdown, domestic sewage, groundwater, stormwater, surface drainage, reverse osmosis reject, water softener regeneration, potable waters, or any other waters that are not part of an industrial process and that do not contain priority pollutants but are combined with industrial wastewater prior to the monitoring point for industrial wastewater discharge. "Diluting waters" also includes excess water used in production processes, such as rinse tanks or rinse water running when in production in excess of operational or quality requirements.
(3) "Director," for purposes of this chapter, shall mean the Director of Water and Sewer Utilities or his/her designee.

II
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 7 of 38 ends

(4) "Discharger'' means any person discharging wastewater into the sanitary sewer system.
(5) "Domestic wastewater" means wastewater from private residences and other premises resulting from the use of water for personal washing, sanitary purposes and/or the elimination of human wastes and related matter." SECTION 5: That subsection (e) of Section 13.10.020 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"(e) "E" definitions:
(1) "Enforcement Response Plan" means the City's plan used to guide enforcement actions taken in response to violations of this code. (2) "Existing source" means any source of discharge that is not a new source."
SECTION 6: That subsection (a) of Section 13.10.020 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 ( entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"(i) "I" definitions:
(1) "Indirect discharge or discharge" means the introduction of pollutants or any discharge of wastewater to the sanitary sewer system. (2) "Industrial user" means any nonresidential user that discharges industrial wastes to the sanitary sewer system.
(3) "Industrial wastes" means the wastes from producing, manufacturing, and processing operations of every kind and nature. (4) Interference.

Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 8 of 38 ends

(A) "Interference" means a discharge that, alone or in
conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources, inhibits or disrupts the processes or operation of the sanitary sewer system, including the plant, or causes or significantly contributes to a violation of any requirement of the National PollutantDischarge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, which is a permit issued to the City pursuant to Section 402 of the Clean Water Act.
(B) "Interference" also includes prevention of biosolids use or disposal by the plant in accordance with published regulations providing guidelines under Section 405 of the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sections 1251 through 1387) or in regulations developed pursuant to the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) (42 U.S.C.

Section 6901 et seq.), the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. Sections 2601 through 2654), or more stringent State regulations (including those contained in any State biosolids management plan prepared pursuant to Title IV of SWDA) applicable to the method of disposal or use employed by the plant."
SECTION 7: That subsection (a) of Section 13.10.020 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"(n) "N" definitions:
(1) "New source" means:
(A) Any building, structure, facility or installation from which there is (or may be) a discharge of pollutants, the construction of which commenced after the publication of proposed pretreatment standards under Section 307(c) of the Clean Water Act that will be applicable to such source if such standards are thereafter promulgated in accordance with that section; provided, that:

Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 9 of 38 ends

(i) The building, structure, facility, or installation is constructed at a site at which no other source is located; or The building, structure, facility or installation totallyreplaces the process or production equipment that causes the discharge of pollutants at anexisting source; or
(ii) The production or wastewater generating
processes of the building, structure, facility or installation are, in the sole judgment of the Director, substantially independent of an existing source at the same site. In determining whether these are substantially independent, factors such as the extent to which the new facility is integrated with the existing plant, and the extent to which the new facility is engaged in the same general type of activity as the existing source, should be considered. (B) Construction on a site at which an existing source is located results in a modification rather than a new source if the construction does not create a new building, structure, facility, or installation meeting the criteria of subsection (n)(1)(A)(ii) or (iii) of this section but otherwise alters, replaces, or adds to existing processor production equipment.
(C) Construction of a new source as defined under this
definition has commenced if the owner or operator has:
(i) Begun, or caused to begin, as part of a continuous
on-site construction program:
a. Any placement, assembly or installation of
facilities or equipment; or
b. Significant site preparation work, including
clearing, excavating, or removal of existing buildings, structures, or facilities, which is necessary for the placement, assembly, or installation of new source facilities or equipment;or Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 10 of 38 ends

(ii) Entered into a contractual obligation for the
purchase of facilities or equipment which are intended to be used in its operation within a reasonable time. Options to purchase or contracts which can be terminated or modified without substantial loss, and contracts for feasibility, engineering, and design studies do not constitute a contractual obligation under this subsection. (2) "Ninety (90) Day Compliance Report" means a report which shall include all requirements of federal regulation, including but not limited to 40 CFR 403.12(d), and:
(A) For a New Source, submitted within ninety (90) days following the commencement of the introduction of wastewater into the POTW, and contain,at a minimum, flow measurements, a measurement of pollutants, and certification of compliance with pretreatment standards; and
(B) For Industrial Users, submitted within ninety (90) days following the final date for compliance with an applicable Pretreatment Standard and contain, at a minimum, flow measurements, a measurement of pollutants, certification of compliance with pretreatment standards and the actual production during sampling period; and for Industrial Users subject to equivalent mass or concentration limits, a reasonable measure of the long-term production rate."
SECTION 8: That subsection (p) of Section 13.10.020 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:

II
II
"(p) "P" definitions:

Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 11 of 38 ends

(1) "Pass-through" means a discharge which exits the plant into waters of the United States in quantities or concentrations which, alone or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources, is a cause of a violation of any requirement of the plant's NPDES permit, including an increase in the magnitude or duration of a violation.
(2) "pH" means the logarithm of the reciprocal of the concentration of hydrogen ions in moles per liter of solution.
(3) "Plant" means the San Jose/Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility, which is also known as the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant. (4) "Pollutant not present" means a pollutant regulated by a categorical pretreatment standard that is not used or stored in a categorical industrial user's facility, is not added to or created by any industrial or pretreatment process at the facility, and is not present above the background levels of the water supply. (5) "Pretreatment standard" means prohibited discharge standards, including those in federal regulations such as 40 CFR, 403.5, categorical pretreatment standards, and local limits.
(6) "Pretreatment requirements" means any substantive or procedural requirement related to pretreatment imposed on an industrial user other than a pretreatment standard.
(7) "Priority pollutants" means all pollutants as defined by the "General Pretreatment Regulations" of the Environmental Protection Agency, found at Title 40, Chapter 1, Subchapter W, Parts 401 and 403 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

II
II
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 12 of 38 ends

(8) "Process flow" means the daily, twenty-four (24)-hour flow of wastewater from any kind or nature of production, manufacturing, or processing operation, including industrial and commercial operations where water is used for the removal of any type of waste other than sanitary sewage. Process flow does not include diluting waters." SECTION 9: That subsection (s) of Section 13.10.020 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 ( entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"(s) "S" definitions:
( 1) "Sanitary sewage" means water-carried wastes from residences, business buildings, institutions, and industrial establishments, excluding ground, surface, and stormwaters, subsurface drainage, and also excluding industrial waste. (2) "Sanitary sewer overflow" is any overflow, spill, release, discharge or diversion of untreated or partially treated wastewater from a sanitary sewer system, including overflows or releases that reach waters of the United States, overflows or releases that do not reach waters of the United States, and backups into buildings and/or private property caused by conditions within the publicly owned portion of the sewer system.
(3) "Sanitary sewer system" means all publicly owned treatment works (POTW), including the Plant, sewers, treatment plants, and other facilities owned or operated by the City for carrying, collecting, pumping, treating, storing, recycling, and disposing of sanitary sewage and industrial wastes.
(4) "Sewer" means a pipe or conduit for carrying sewage.

II
II
Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 13 of 38 ends

(5) "Sewer lateral" (same as "sewer service lateral") means the sewer connection piping used to convey sewage from a building or facility on a parcel (private or public property) to the City- owned sewer main. Each sewer lateral is owned by the entity that owns the property or facility from which that sewer lateral serves to convey sewage.
(6) "Significant change" means any change in an industrial user's operation that results in any of the following:
(A) An increase or decrease in twelve-month average
process flow of twenty-five percent (25%) over the standard discharger's average process flow for the discharger's most immediate preceding twelve (12) months. (B) An increase or decrease in twelve-month average
process flow that results in a change from low flow discharger to standard discharger or from standard discharger to low flow discharger.
(C) An increase or decrease in twelve-month average
process flow that results in a change from nonsignificant industrial user to significant industrial user or from significant industrial user to nonsignificant industrial user. (D) An increase or decrease in twelve-month production rate of twenty-five percent (25%) for any industrial user subject to production-based limits over the industrial user's production rate for the most immediate preceding twelve (12) months. (E) Adding or deleting processes, process discharges or sample points.
(F) Waiver of monitoring requirements for any pollutant not present.
(7) "Significant industrial user" means:

Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 14 of 38 ends

(A) An industrial user that has processes subject to
categorical pretreatment standards except as provided under subsection (s)(7)(C) of this section; or
(B) An industrial user that:
(i) Discharges an average of twenty-five thousand
(25,000) gpd or more of process wastewater to the sanitary system (excluding sanitary, noncontact cooling and boiler blowdown wastewater); or
(ii) Contributes a process waste-stream which makes
up five percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic capacity of the plant; or
(iii) Is designated as such by the Director on the basis that it has a reasonable potential for adversely affecting the plant's operation or for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement.
(C) A significant industrial user includes an industrial user that has processes subject to categorical pretreatment standards if the industrial user:
(i) Does not discharge more than one hundred (100)
gpd of total categorical process wastewater;
(ii) Has complied with all applicable categorical
pretreatment standards;
(iii) Never discharges any untreated concentrated
wastewater; and
(iv) Submits annually a certificate statement pursuant to 40 CFR Section 403.12(g).

II
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 15 of 38 ends

(8) "Significant noncompliance" means a violation or violations by an industrial user meeting one or more of the following criteria:
(A) Chronic violations of wastewater discharge limits defined here as those in which sixty-six percent (66%) or more of all the measurements taken during a six-month period exceed (by any magnitude) a numeric pretreatment standard or requirement, including instantaneous limits, as defined by 40 CFR Section 403.3(1); (B) Technical review criteria (TRC) violations, defined here as those in which thirty-three percent (33%) or more of all the measurements for each pollutant parameter taken during a six-month period equal or exceed the product of the numeric pretreatment standard or requirement including instantaneous limits, as defined by 40 CFR Section 403.3(1), multiplied by the applicable TRC (TRC equals 1.4 for BOD, TSS, fats, oil and grease, and 1.2 for all other pollutants except pH); (C) Any other violation of a pretreatment standard or
requirement as defined by 40 CFR Section 403.3(1) (daily maximum, long-term average, instantaneous limit, or narrative standard) that the Director determines has caused, alone or in combination with other discharges, interference or pass-through (including endangering the health of the Director, personnel or the general public); (D) Any discharge of a pollutant that has caused imminent endangerment to human health, welfare or to the environment or has resulted in the plant's exercise of its emergency authority to halt or prevent such a discharge; (E) Failure to meet, within ninety (90) days after the
scheduled due date, a compliance schedule milestone contained in a discharge permit or enforcement order for starting construction, completing construction, or attaining final compliance;
Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 16 of 38 ends

(F) Failure to provide, within forty-five (45) days after the due date, required reports such as baseline monitoring reports, ninety (90)-day compliance reports, periodic self-monitoring reports, and reports on compliance with compliance schedules;
(G) Failure to accurately report noncompliance; and
(H) Any other violation or group of violations, which may include a violation of reasonable control measures, which the Director determines will adversely affect the operation or implementation of the pretreatment program. (9) "Slug control plan" means the document prepared pursuant to 40 CFR Section 403.8(f)(1)(iii) (8)(6) by a significant industrial user that describes the procedural and operational controls in place to prevent a slug load or slug discharge. (10) "Slug load" or "slug discharge" means any discharge of a nonroutine, episodic nature, including but not limited to an accidental spill or noncustomary batch discharge, which has a reasonable potential to cause interference or pass-through orin any other way cause a violation of the provisions of this chapter or applicable permit conditions.
(11) "Source" means any building, structure, facility or installation from which there is or may be a potential as determined by the Director discharge pollutants above the local limits included in this chapter or State or Federal limits or wastewater of such volume or strength that it may cause interference, pass-through or operational problems in the sanitary sewer system or at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant.
(12) "Standard discharger" means any industrial discharger who is not a low flow discharger."
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 17 of 38 ends

SECTION 10: Section 13.10.210 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.210 Pretreatment by owner or operator.

Each owner or operator shall, at the owner's or operator's own expense, provide such treatment or take such other measures, as the Director may require to prevent accidental discharge, reduce objectionable characteristics, contents, or rate of discharge of waters or waste being deposited in the sanitary sewer system, to prevent damage to or interference with the sanitary sewer system."
SECTION 11: Section 13.10.230 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.230 Storm and other waters.
(a) No person shall discharge, cause, allow, or permit any stormwater, surface water, ground water, subsurface drainage or roof runoff to be discharged into the sanitary sewer system or any part thereof without a wastewater discharge permit or prior authorization from the Director.
(b) A wastewater discharge permit for the discharge of ground water, subsurface drainage, surface water, roof water or stormwater shall only be issued if there is no reasonable alternative method for disposal of such water. (c) If permitted, discharge of ground water or subsurface drainage, surface water, roof water or stormwater shall be subject to all applicable requirements of this chapter, including, but not limited to, the payment of applicable permit fees and such terms and conditions as the Director may impose in the wastewater discharge permit." Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 18 of 38 ends

SECTION 12: Section 13.10.270 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.270 Grease, oils, fats.
(a) No person shall discharge, cause, allow, or permit to be discharged into the sanitary sewer system any liquid or other waste containing grease in excess of one hundred fifty (150) parts per million by weight.
(b) No person shall discharge, cause, allow, or permit any grease discharge from a food service establishment into the sanitary sewer system, unless such discharge has first been processed through an approved grease control device. (c) No person shall discharge, cause, allow, or permit to be discharged any yellow grease, or any waste or material mixed with yellow grease, into the sanitary sewer system from a food service establishment. No yellow grease from a food service establishment shall be mixed with grease trap or grease interceptor waste. (d) Any Industrial user that violates the grease limit shall resample and submit reports to the City for all pollutants in violation of any applicable permit limits or any other pollutants as required by the Director within thirty days of becoming aware of the violations."
SECTION 13: Section 13.10.290 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.290 Corrosive matter.

II
II
Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 19 of 38 ends

(a) No person shall discharge, cause, allow, or permit to be discharged into the sanitary sewer system, or any part thereof, any liquid, solid, vapor, gas, or thing having a pH lower than 6.0 or equal to or greater than 12.5, or having any other corrosive property capable of causing damage or hazard to the sanitary sewer system, or any part thereof, orto any personnel operating, maintaining, repairing, or constructing said sanitary sewer system, or any part thereof, or working in or about the sanitary sewer system. (b) Any Industrial user that violates any of the corrosive matter limits shall resample and submit sample reports for all pollutants in violation of any applicable permit limits or any other pollutants as required by the Director within thirty days of becoming aware of the violation."
SECTION 14: Section 13.10.310 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.310 Interfering substances.
(a) No person shall discharge, cause, allow, or permit to be discharged into the sanitary sewer system, or any part thereof, any industrial waste containing any of the following toxic substances exceeding the concentrations set forth in Table A. (b) No person shall discharge, cause, allow, or permit to be discharged into the sanitary sewer system, or any part thereof, any toxic or poisonous substances or any other pollutant, including biochemical oxygen demand, in sufficient quantity to:
(1) Injure or cause an interference with the sewage treatment process or pass through the Plant;
(2) Constitute a hazard to humans or animals;
II
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 20 of 38 ends

(3) Create a hazard for humans or aquatic life in any waters receiving effluent from the sanitary sewer system; or
(4) Create a hazard in the use or disposal of sewage sludge. (c) All samples, including grab and composite, may be used to evaluate compliance with the limits in Table A.
( d) Any industrial user that violates any of the interfering substances limits must resample and submit sample reports for all pollutants in violation of any applicable limits or any other pollutants as required by the Director within thirty (30) days of becoming aware of the violation.

II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 21 of 38 ends

Toxic Substance
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium, Total
Copper
Cyanide, Total
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Phenols, Total
Selenium
Silver
Zinc

TABLE A

INTERFERING SUBSTANCES
Standard Discharger
Maximum

5.0 mg/I

1.0 mg/I

0.75 mg/I

0.7 mg/I

1.0 mg/I

2.3 mg/I

0.5 mg/I

0.4 mg/I

0.010 mg/I

0.5 mg/I

30.0 mg/I

1.0 mg/I

0.7 mg/I

2.6 mg/I
Low Flow Discharger
Maximum

5.0 mg/I

1.0 mg/I

0.75 mg/I

0.7 mg/I

1.0 mg/I

2.7 mg/I

0.5 mg/I

0.4 mg/I

0.010 mg/I

2.6 mg/I

30.0 mg/I

1.0 mg/I

0.7 mg/I

2.6 mg/I
SECTION 15: Section 13.10.390 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.390 Installation and maintenance of amalgam separators.

II
II
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 22 of 38 ends

(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, no person shalldischarge, cause, allow or permit any discharge to the sanitary sewer system from a dentalvacuum system, unless such discharge has first been processed through an amalgam separator.
(b) For each dental vacuum system installed prior to July 1, 2009, an amalgam separator shall be installed on or before December 31, 2010. No dental vacuum system shall be installed on or after January 31, 2009, without an amalgam separator. Proof of certification and installation records shall be submitted to the Director within ninety (90) days of installation.
(c) A dental vacuum system may be operated without an amalgam separator; provided, that the system is not used in connection with the removal or placement offillings that contain dental amalgam, except in limited emergency or unplanned, unanticipated circumstances, and the system is used exclusively by the following types of dental practices: (1) oral pathology (2) oral and maxillofacial radiology (3) oral and maxillofacial surgery (4) orthodontics (5) periodontics or (6) prosthodontics. ( d) Amalgam separators shall be maintained in accordance with manufacturerrecommendations. Installation, certification, and maintenance records shall be maintainedfor a minimum of five years and available for immediate inspection upon request therefor bythe Director or designee during normal business hours." SECTION 16: Section 13.10.420 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.420 Mandatory wastewater discharge permits.

Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 23 of 38 ends

No critical user, zero discharge categorical user, or significant industrial user shall connect, discharge, cause, allow, or permit any discharge into the sanitary sewer system except in accordance with a discharge permit issued by the Director." SECTION 17: Section 13.10.440 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.440 Permit application.
(a) All persons requiring a discharge permit shall file a complete application, inthe form prescribed by the Director, and accompanied by the applicable fees, as established by resolution of the City Council.
(b) For new construction, permit applications shall be filed with the Director at thetime that an application for a building permit for a new building or structure is made. ( c) All persons discharging wastewater into the sanitary sewer system for which awastewater discharge permit has been issued must apply for a new permit prior to makinga significant change in the operations affecting their discharge. (d) Waiver of pollutants not present.
(1) A categorical industrial user seeking to request a waiver of monitoring requirements for pollutants not present must submit the following with its permit application:
(A) Data from at least one sampling of the facility's
processwastewater prior to any treatment that is representative of all wastewater from all processes;
(B) Signature in compliance with SCCC 13.10.460;
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 24 of 38 ends

(C) Certification statement as specified under 40 CFR
Section 403.6(a)(2)(ii); and
(D) Other technical factors as may be required by the
Director to demonstrate that the pollutant is not present in the industrial user's discharge. (2) If approved, the waiver shall be included as part of the categorical industrial user's discharge permit. The categorical industrial user must certify in each self monitoring report with the statement set forth in 40 CFR Section 403.12(e)(2)(v) that there has been no increase in the waste stream due to the activities of the user of the pollutant that was waived.
(3) The waiver shall only be valid for the term of the permit, and anew request for waiver must be submitted for each new permit." SECTION 18: Section 13.10.460 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.460 Signature requirements.
(a) Permit applications, discharge reports, and any other reports required by the Director to be signed shall be signed by an Authorized or Duly Authorized Representativeof the User filing the application.
(b) Reports subject to the requirements of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations shall include the following certification statement as contained in the Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations:

II
II
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 25 of 38 ends

I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted.

Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations."
SECTION 19: Section 13.10.470 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows: 13.10.470 Additional information.
(a) If the Director is not satisfied that the permit application has sufficient information to determine whether the permit should be issued, the Director may refuse to issue the permit or request that the applicant submit further information. (b) The applicant shall have fourteen (14) calendar days, or such longer period oftime as allowed by the Director, after reviewing a request for information, to complete theapplication.
(c) If the returned application is not resubmitted within the specified time period,then a new application for a discharge permit must be submitted along with the applicationfees and any delinquent fees for a new permit." SECTION 20: Section 13.10.480 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:

Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 26 of 38 ends

"13.10.480 No transfer of permit.
(a) Discharge permits are issued to a specific user for a specific operation. A discharge permit shall not be reassigned or transferred or sold to a new owner, new user, different premises, or a new or changed operation without prior approval of the Director. (b) Wastewater discharge permit may be transferred to a new owner or operatoronly if the permittee provides advance written notice to the Director and the Director approves the transfer of a wastewater discharge permit. (1) The notice to the Director must include a certification by the newowner or operator which:
a. States the new owner and/or operator has no
immediateintent to change the facility's operations and processes; b. Identifies the specific date on which the transfer is to occur; and
c. Acknowledges full responsibility for complying with
theexisting individual wastewater discharge permit.
(2) Failure to provide advanced notice of a transfer renders the wastewater discharge permit void as of the date of facility transfer. (c) Upon an approved transfer, the existing owner or operator shall provide a copy of the wastewater discharge permit to the new owner or operator. The new owner oroperator shall submit a wastewater discharge permit application and appropriate permit application fee within thirty (30) days of the date of the approved transfer.

II
II
Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 27 of 38 ends

(d) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to prevent the application of termsand conditions of this Chapter, including enforcement penalties, from applying to a succeeding owner or operator, successor in interest, or other assigns of an existing contract or permit holder."
SECTION 21: Section 13.10.500 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.500 Permit conditions.
(a) Discharge permits shall be expressly subject to all provisions of this chapter and all other regulations, user charges, discharge limitations, and fees established by theCity and all applicable local, State, and Federal law and regulations. (b) The permit may include such terms and conditions as the Director may deem necessary to implement this chapter, or any other applicable local, State, or Federal lawand regulations, including, but not limited to:
(1) Limits on the average and maximum wastewater volume, constituents and characteristics;
(2) Requirements for installation and maintenance of flow monitoring, inspection, and sampling facilities;
(3) Specifications and pretreatment requirements for
monitoring programs which may include sampling locations, frequency of sampling, number, types andstandards for tests, and reporting schedule; (4) Compliance schedules;
II
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 28 of 38 ends

(5) Requirements for submission of technical reports or discharge reports;
(6) Requirements for maintaining and retaining plant records relating to wastewater discharge as specified by the City and affording the City access thereto;
(7) Requirements for notification to the City of any new introduction of wastewater constituents or any significant change in the volume or character of the wastewater constituents being introduced into the wastewater stream; (8) Requirements and plans for protection against accidental discharges, including, but not limited to, berming of chemicals and waste materials. The review and approval of such plans and operating procedures shall not relieve the user of the responsibility of modifying the facility as necessary to provide the protection necessary to meet the requirements of this Code or other State or Federal regulations; (9) Requirements for notification of accidental discharges; (10) Requirements for submission of a slug control plan or specific elements thereof.
(c) No person shall fail to comply with the terms and conditions of a discharge permit, or fail to comply with any other mandatory provision of this chapter, or other regulations, or discharge limitations established by the city, or local, state and federal laws and regulations. Each violation of the permit condition or other rule, regulation, or law, shall be a separate violation under this code."
II
II
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 29 of 38 ends

SECTION 22: That a new Section 13.10.525 is added to Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California to read as follows:
"13.10.525 Best management practices.
(a) The Director may develop best management practices (BMPs), by ordinance or in individual wastewater discharge permits, to implement local limits, federal regulations,and the requirements under this Chapter.
(b) All industrial users shall follow BMPs established by ordinance, individual wastewater discharge permit, or implement BMPs in their operations to minimize the discharge of pollutants to the sanitary sewer system and ensure appropriate monitoring, treatment, and other measures are being taken to prevent violations. (c) When an industrial user develops BMPs in response to an enforcement action, the user shall continue to implement those BMPs and any associated record keeping unless approved to discontinue.
(d) Industrial users subject to BMPs as a means of complying with the standardsof this Title shall maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance with the applicableBMP standards.
(e) Periodic reports on continued compliance for BMP regulated dischargers shall require the discharger to certify that the BMPs have been implemented during the reporting period."
SECTION 23: Section 13.10.570 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:

Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 30 of 38 ends

"13.10.570 Power to inspect.
(a) The Director and other duly authorized employees and agents of the City bearing credentials and identification shall have the right to access upon all properties for the purpose of investigating compliance, with all the requirements of this Code, state, federal regulations, and any permit, and for inspecting any sewer or storm drain connection, including, but not limited to, all discharge connections of roof and surface drains and plumbing fixtures; inspecting, observing, measuring, photographing, sampling, and testing the quality, consistency, and characteristics of sewage and industrial wastewaters being discharged into any public sewer or natural outlet; and inspecting and copying any records relating to quantity and quality of wastewater discharges, including, but not limited to, water usage and effluent discharge, chemical usage, and hazardous waste records.
(b) It shall be unlawful to unreasonably obstruct, delay, or interfere with the Cityaccess to the owner's and/or operator's premises.
(c) The Director may terminate service or revoke the permit of any person whohas unreasonably refused or delayed access to the City".

SECTION 24: Section 13.10.580 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.580 Discharge reports.

II
II
II
Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 31 of 38 ends

(a) Dischargers are subject to the reporting requirements as contained in Title 40 CFR. The Director may require that any person connected to or discharging wastewater into the sanitary sewer system file additional periodic discharge reports or a zero dischargereport, including, but not limited to, the requirements contained in 40 CFR 403.12, or otherapplicable federal regulation.
(b) The periodic discharge report may be required to include, but need not be limited to, nature of process, volume, rates of flow, mass emission rate, hours of operation, number of employees, hauling record, potential slug discharge, or other information which relates to the generation of waste, including wastewater constituents and characteristics inthe wastewater discharge and the ability of the discharger to meet applicable discharge limits.
(c) The zero discharge report shall certify that the zero discharger user does notdischarge any process water to sanitary sewer system, or for a zero discharge categorical user, discharge any categorical process water or ancillary process water to the designatedzero discharge categorical sample point or into the sanitary sewer system. This report maybe required to include, but need not be limited to, the nature of the process, hours of operation, number of employees, hauling records, or other information that relates to thegeneration of wastes.
(d) The Director may also require such periodic discharge reports and zero discharge reports to include information concerning the chemical constituents and quantity of chemicals stored on site, including waste hauling records or other information, which relates to the generation of wastes even though they may not normally be discharged.

II
Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 32 of 38 ends

(e) In addition to discharge reports, the Director may require dischargers to submit such additional reports as may be necessary to allow the City to evaluate the discharger's ability to comply with this chapter, including but not limited to best management practice or self-monitoring reports.
(f) It shall be unlawful for any person who has discharged wastewater to the sanitary sewer system to refuse to file any report requested by the Director, to file an incomplete or inaccurate report, or to file any report after the application due date specified by the Director.
(g) Sampling and analysis shall be performed in accordance with federal regulations including 40 CFR 403.12 and amendments thereto. Where federal regulations do not contain sampling or analytical methods for the pollutant in question, or where the Director determines that federal regulations are inappropriate for the pollutant in question, sampling and analysis shall be performed by using analytical methods validated by the Director."
SECTION 25: Section 13.10.590 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.590 Termination of service.
(a) The Director may revoke any wastewater discharge permit, and/or terminate,or cause to be terminated, wastewater service to any premises:
(1) If a discharge of wastewater from the premises causes or threatens to cause a violation of any provision of this chapter or applicable local, State, or Federal regulations; or
Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 33 of 38 ends

(2) If a discharge of wastewater from the premises causes or threatens to cause a condition of contamination, pollution, or nuisance. (3) If a permittee violates any provision of this chapter or applicable local, state or federal regulations or permit condition. (b) This provision is in addition to other statutes, rules or regulations authorizingtermination of service for delinquency in payment." SECTION 26: Section 13.10.600 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.600 Permit revocation.

Wastewater discharge permits may be revoked if a permittee violates any provision of this chapter or applicable local, state, federal regulations or permit condition or for one or more material violations of this chapter, including but not limited to:
(a) Failure to notify the City of changes to the user's operations or systems asdescribed in the wastewater discharge permit application; (b) Misrepresentation of or failure to fully disclose all relevant facts in thewastewater discharge permit application;
II
(c) Falsifying self-monitoring reports;
(d) Tampering with monitoring facilities or equipment;
(e) Refusing to allow the City timely access to the facility premises and records; (f) Failure to meet the prohibitions on discharge according to applicable State, Federal and local law;
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 34 of 38 ends

(g) Failure to meet compliance time schedules or any wastewater discharge permit conditions or requirements;
(h) Failure to pay fines and/or penalties;
(i) Failure to pay sewer charges;
U) Failure to complete a wastewater discharge permit application or submit adischarge report;
(k) Violation of any pretreatment standard or requirement." SECTION 27: Section 13.10.640 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is amended to read as follows:
"13.10.640 Violations and Penalties.
(a) No person shall discharge in violation of, or fail to comply with the requirements of a discharge permit, or any other provision of this chapter, or other regulations, or discharge limitations established by the city, or local, state and federal laws and regulations. Each violation of the permit condition or other rule, regulation, or law, shall be a separate violation under this code.
(b) Pursuant to SCCC Chapters 1.05 and 1.10, the City, in its prosecutorial discretion, may enforce violations of the provisions of this chapter as a criminal, civil, and/or administrative action. All penalties and citations pursuant to applicable law, including but not limited to Government Code Section 54740.5 and SCCC Chapters 1.05 and 1.10, shall apply to violations of this chapter.

II
II
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 35 of 38 ends

(c) In addition to the provisions of SCCC Chapters 1.05 and 1.10, and due to the significant potential harm caused to the environment by violation of provisions of this chapter, any person who intentionally, accidentally, or negligently violates any provisions of this chapter or any provision of any permit issued pursuant to this chapter, or who intentionally, accidentally, or negligently discharges waste or wastewater that causes pollution or violates any effluent limitation, standard of performance, or pretreatment or toxicity standard shall be civilly liable to the City in a sum up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) for the first day in which such violation occurs, up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) for the second day in which such violation occurs, and fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) for each additional day. The City may petition a court of appropriate jurisdiction to impose, assess, and recover such sums. Funds collected pursuant to this section shall be paid to City's environmental compliance fee account. (d) Any assessed penalty shall be paid within ten days from the date of notice ofsuch penalty. Interest shall accrue at the rate of the United States government T-Bills sold at the latest sale prior to the date of the delinquency plus three percent prorated per monthor fraction thereof on the amount of penalty from the date of delinquency. (e) The amount of any penalties imposed under this chapter which have remained delinquent for a period of sixty (60) days shall constitute a lien against the realproperty of the discharger from which the violation occurred resulting in imposition of thepenalty. The Director shall cause the amount of uncollected penalty to be recorded with the County Recorder, in accordance with Government Code Section 54740.5.

II
II
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 36 of 38 ends

(f) The City may take enforcement action into immediate effect for any violation of this Code, including through escalation as set forth in the Enforcement Response Plan. Nothing in this Code or the Enforcement Response Plan requires escalation of enforcementand, instead, the City may take any action it deems necessary under the circumstances.
(g) Any and all remedies for violations of this chapter are cumulative and not exclusive and shall be in addition to all other remedies available to the City under State andFederal law and local ordinances. Funds collected pursuant to this section shall be paid toCity's environmental compliance fee account."
SECTION 28: Section 13.10.670 of Chapter 13.10 (entitled "Sewers") of Title 13 (entitled "Public Services") of the Code of the City of Santa Clara, California is repealed.

SECTION 29: Ordinances Repealed. With exception of the provisions protected by the savings clause, all ordinances (or parts of ordinances) in conflict with or inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed.

SECTION 30: Savings clause. The changes provided for in this ordinance shall not affect any offense or act committed or done or any penalty or forfeiture incurred or any right established or accruing before the effective date of this ordinance; nor shall it affect any prosecution, suit or proceeding pending or any judgment rendered prior to the effective date of this ordinance. All fee schedules shall remain in force until superseded by the fee schedules adopted by the City Council.

II
II
II
Ordinance/ Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 37 of 38 ends

SECTION 31: Environmental Determination. This ordinance is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines, actions taken by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment.

SECTION 32: Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its final adoption; however, prior to its final adoption it shall be published in accordance with the requirements of Section 808 and 812 of "The Charter of the City of Santa Clara, California." PASSED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PUBLICATION this 14th day of December, 2021, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILORS:

NOES: COUNCILORS:

ABSENT: COUNCILORS :

ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS:

Becker, Chahal, Hardy, Jain, Park, and Watanabe,
and Mayor Gillmor
None
None
None
ATTEST:
~

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA
Attachments incorporated by reference: None
Ordinance/Amending Chapter 13.10 "SEWERS"
Rev: 09/2019

Page 38 of 38 ends

City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-1763 Agenda Date: 1/11/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Action on Annual Appointment of Vice Mayor and Chaplain

COUNCIL PILLAR
Enhance Community Engagement and Transparency

BACKGROUND
At the beginning of each calendar year, the City Council (Council) appoints a Vice Mayor and Chaplain to serve for approximately one year until a successor Vice Mayor and successor Chaplain can be appointed the following year.

On January 15, 2019, the Council adopted Resolution No. 19-8650 (Attachment 1) establishing, pursuant to Section 705 of the City Charter, a procedure for selection of a Vice Mayor and selection of a Chaplain, by a majority vote of a quorum of the Council. Resolution No. 19-8650 states that the Vice Mayor shall be the Councilmember with the highest seniority in consecutive years on the Council and who has not previously served as Vice Mayor. The most recent outgoing Vice Mayor will serve as Chaplain. The resolution further states that, if two or more Councilmembers have the same seniority in number of years served on the Council, the Vice Mayor will be determined by who received the most votes in the most recent municipal election.

DISCUSSION
The table below identifies the Councilmembers who have served as Vice Mayor since 2012.

Vice Mayor Calendar Year
Lisa M. Gillmor 2012
Patrick Kolstad 2013
Gerald “Jerry” Marsalli 2014
Debi Davis 2015
Teresa O’Neill 2016
Dominic Caserta 2017
Kathy Watanabe 2018
Patricia M. Mahan 2019
Karen Hardy 2020
Raj Chahal 2021
As Vice Mayor Raj Chahal is the outgoing Vice Mayor, he is eligible to serve as the next Chaplain. In City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/6/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
22-1763 Agenda Date: 1/11/2022
Mayor Lisa M. Gillmor’s letter to the Council (Attachment 2), she recommends that the Council appoint Vice Mayor Chahal to the position of Chaplain until the appointment of a successor Chaplain in January 2023.

Councilmembers Sudhanshu “Suds” Jain, Kevin Park, and Anthony Becker have not yet served as Vice Mayor and have the same seniority in number of consecutive years served on the Council.

Consistent with the selection process outlined in Resolution No. 19-8650, the Vice Mayor will be the Councilmember who received the most votes in the Consolidated Municipal Election held on November 3, 2020, with the Statewide Presidential Election.

On December 16, 2020, the Council adopted Resolution No. 20-8942 (Attachment 3), which declares the results of the Consolidated Municipal Election held on November 3, 2020, and includes the County of Santa Clara Certificate of Election Results. Councilmember Sudhanshu “Suds” Jain received 4,335 votes, Councilmember Kevin Park received 3,873 votes, and Councilmember Anthony Becker received 3,452 votes. As Councilmember Jain received the most votes in the Consolidated Municipal Election, he is eligible to serve as the next Vice Mayor.

In Mayor Gillmor’s letter to the Council (Attachment 4), she recommends that the Council appoint Councilmember Jain to the position of Vice Mayor until the appointment of a successor Vice Mayor in January 2023.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action being considered does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) in that it is a governmental organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City other than administrative staff time.

COORDINATION
This report was coordinated with the City Attorney’s Office.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City’s official-notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting. A hard copy of any agenda report may be requested by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 615-2220, email [email protected].

RECOMMENDATION
Appoint Councilmember Sudhanshu “Suds” Jain as Vice Mayor and appoint Vice Mayor Raj Chahal as Chaplain for approximately one year until the appointment of a successor Vice Mayor and successor Chaplain in January 2023.

Reviewed by: Genevieve Yip, Management Analyst
Approved by: Deanna J. Santana, City Manager
City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/6/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
22-1763 Agenda Date: 1/11/2022

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 19-8650

2. Letter from Mayor Lisa M. Gillmor recommending Vice Mayor Raj Chahal as Chaplain

3. Resolution No. 20-8942

4. Letter from Mayor Lisa M. Gillmor recommending Councilmember Suds Jain as Vice Mayor City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/6/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
RESOLUTION NO. 19-8650

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA
REPEALING AND REPLACING RESOLUTION NO. 6442 FOR
ESTABLISHING, PURSUANT TO SECTION 705 OF THE CITY

CHARTER, A PROCEDURE FOR SELECTION OF VICE MAYOR

AND SELECTION OF CHAPLAIN OF THE CITY COUNCIL
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, Section 705 of the City Charter provides that the City Council will designate one of its members as Vice Mayor to perform the duties of the Mayor during the Mayor's absence or disability;
WHEREAS, on June 9, 1998, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6442, which established, pursuant to Section 705 of the City Charter, a procedure for selection of Vice Mayor and selection of Chaplain of the City Council;
WHEREAS, this Resolution will replace Resolution No. 6442 and establish an amended procedure for the selection of Vice Mayor and Chaplain of the Santa Clara City Council; and WHEREAS, the goal of this policy is to provide for an orderly progression for the opportunity to serve in the Vice Mayor and Chaplain positions with the objective to give every elected Councilmembers the opportunity to serve as Vice Mayor.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

1. That Resolution No. 6442, attached hereto as Attachment 1, is hereby repealed in its entirety.

2. In January of each year, the City Council shall select a Vice Mayor and a Chaplain by majority vote of a quorum of the City Council.

3. The Vice Mayor and Chaplain shall commence service immediately upon selection and shall serve for approximately one (1) year until the next Vice Mayor and Chaplain are appointed, provided that such service shall be at the pleasure of the City Council.

Resolution/Repeal and Replace Resolution No. 6442
Rev: 12/14/2018

Page 1 ends

4. The Vice Mayor, after adoption of this Resolution, shall be the City Councilmember with (a) the highest seniority in consecutive years on the Council and (2) who has not previously served as Vice Mayor.

5. If two or more Councilmembers have the same seniority in number of consecu _tive years served on the City Council, the Vice Mayor selected will be the Councilmember who received the most votes in the most recent applicable council election.

6. No Councilmember shall serve more than once as Vice Mayor unless all Councilmembers, expressly including those joining the Council from a later election, have had an opportunity to serve in that position.

7. A Councilmember may choose to not serve as Vice Mayor or exchange such service opportunity. Councilmembers may exchange places in the Vice Mayor rotation (i.e., allow another member to take his/her position in the rotation) if a majority of a Council quorum votes to approve the request.

8. The Chaplain will be selected in January of each year by majority vote of a quorum of the City Council. The Chaplain will be the most recent outgoing Vice Mayor .

9. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED

AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE :

AYES: COUNCILORS :

NOES : COUNCILORS :

ABSENT: COUNCILORS :

ABSTAINED : COUNCILORS :

Attachments incorporated by reference:

1. Resolution No. 6442
Resolution/Repeal and Replace Resolution No. 6442
Rev: 12/14/2018
Chahal , Davis, Hardy, Mahan, O'Neill, and
Watanabe and Mayor Gillmor
None
None
None ~
ATTEST: ~ lp
_ ......._.N"""'o"""R'-'A-P-"-1M'-=E= N-"--'F-r-L_,_, _M_M_c __ _

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA

Page 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 6442

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING, PURSUANT
TO SECTION 705 OF THE CITY CHARTER, A PROCEDURE

FOR SELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEMPORE AND

SELECTION OF A CHAPLAIN OF THE CITY COUNCIL

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, as follows:

WHEREAS, Section 705 of the City Charter provides that the City Council will designate one of its members as Mayor Pro Tempore to perform the duties of the Mayor during the Mayor's absence or disability; arid
WHEREAS, this Resolution establishes a procedure for the selection of Mayor Pro Tempore and Chaplain of the Santa Clara City Council; and
WHEREAS, the goal of this policy is to provide for an orderly progression for the opportunity to serve in the Mayor Pro Tempore and Chaplain positions with the objective to give every elected Council member the opportunity to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore. This policy is based on the existing Council s~niority policy for City representation at special events, when the Mayor is not available to represent the City. This policy also acknowledges voter's input during the election process.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, as follows:
(1) In December of each year, the City Council shall select a Mayor Pro Tempore and a Chaplain by majority vote of a quornm of the City Council.
(2) The Mayor Pro Tempore and Chaplain shall commence service on the immediately following January 1st and shall serve for a one ( 1) year term, provided that such service shall be at the pleasure of the City Council.
(3) The first Mayor Pro Tempore, after adoption of this Resolution, shall be the City Council member with (a) the highest seniority in consecutive years on the Council and (2) who has not previously Resolution/Selecting Mayor Pro Tempore and Chaplain Page I of2 served as Mayor Pro Tempore.
(4) If two or more Council members have the same seniority in number of consecutive years served on the City Council, the Mayor Pro Tempore selected will be the Council member who received the most votes in the most recent applicable council election. (5) The order ofrotation for appointment of subsequent Mayors Pro Tempore shall be determined by seniority and election vote result as stated above.
(6) No Council member shall serve more than once as Mayor Pro Tempore unless all Council members, expressly including those joining the Council from a later election, have had an opportunity to serve in that position.
(7) A Council member may choose to not serve as Mayor Pro Tempore or exchange such service opportunity. Council members may exchange places in the Mayor Pro Tempore rotation (i.e., allow another member to take his/her position in the rotation) ifa majority ofa Council quonnn votes to approve the request.
(8) TI1e Chaplain will be selected in December of each year by majority vote of a quorum of the City Council. The Chaplain will be the most recent outgoing Mayor Pro Tempore.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 9thDAY OF JUNE, 1998, BY THB FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCILORS: Arno, Diridon, Gillmor, Mahan, Mclemore, Parle and Mayor Nadler
NOES: COUNCILORS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILORS: None
ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS: None
I:WOL2\DATA\WP\RESOLUTI\MA YORPR3.TEM
Resolution/Selecting Mayor Pro Tempore and Chaplain
ATTEST:

Page 2 of 2 ends

1500 Warburton Avenue ● Santa Clara, CA 95050 ● Phone: 408-615-2200 ● Fax: 408-241-6771 ● www.SantaClaraCA.gov Mayor
Lisa M. Gillmor

Councilmembers
Kathy Watanabe, District 1
Raj Chahal, District 2
Karen Hardy, District 3
Kevin Park, District 4
Suds Jain, District 5
Anthony J. Becker, District 6

January 11, 2022

Santa Clara City Council
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050

Dear City Council:

On January 15, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 19-8650, pursuant to Section 705 of the City Charter, to establish a procedure for the selection of Vice Mayor (Mayor Pro Tempore) and Chaplain for a calendar year.

Per the resolution, the City Council shall select a Vice Mayor by a majority vote of a quorum of the City Council, with the selection scheduled to take place at a City Council meeting at the beginning of each calendar year and that the most recent outgoing Vice Mayor shall serve as Chaplain. As the most recent outgoing Vice Mayor and per the procedure established by Resolution No. 19-8650, Vice Mayor Raj Chahal is eligible to serve as Chaplain.

It is my honor to recommend that the City Council appoint Vice Mayor Raj Chahal to the position of Chaplain for approximately one year until the appointment of a successor Chaplain in January 2023. Vice Mayor Raj Chahal was elected to the Santa Clara City Council in November 2018 and previously served on the City’s Planning Commission, International Exchange Commission, and Charter Review Committee. With his experience serving the City in multiple capacities, I am confident that he will capably fulfill the duties of Chaplain.

Sincerely,

Lisa M. Gillmor
Mayor
City of Santa Clara
RESOLUTION NO. 20-8942

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA

RECITING THE FACTS OF THE CONSOLIDATED MUNICIPAL

ELECTION HELD IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA ON
NOVEMBER 3, 2020, WITH THE STATEWIDE PRESIDENTIAL

ELECTION DECLARING THE RES UL TS OF THE ELECTION AND

SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, a Consolidated Municipal Election was held with the Statewide Presidential Election and conducted in the City of Santa Clara, on Tuesday, November 3, 2020, as required by law;
WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law; that voting precincts were properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California for holding of elections in charter cities; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 20-8862 (a resolution calling for a consolidated municipal election to be held on November 3, 2020 with the Statewide Presidential election) adopted on June 23, 2020; and Resolution No. 20-8878 (a resolution calling for a consolidated special municipal election to be held on November 3, 2020 with the Statewide Presidential election) adopted on July 14 , 2020, the County Registrar of Voters canvassed the returns of the election and has certified to this City Council, the results are received, attached and made part of hereof as Exhibit A and B.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the total number of votes (ballots): 49,286.

II
II
Resolution/Certifying Election Results
Rev: 11 /22/17

Page 1 of 3 ends

2. That the names of the persons voted for at the election for Councilmember in Council District 1: Kathy Watanabe, for Councilmember in Council District 4: Kevin Nara Park, for Councilmember in Council District 5: Sudhanshu "Suds" Jain, for Councilmember in Council District 6: Anthony Becker, for City Clerk: Hosam Haggag and for Chief of Police: Pat Nikolai.

3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the City to the persons named above for the respective offices for which the persons were a candidate are listed in the attached Exhibits A and B.

4. That the City Council does declare and determine that: Kathy Watanabe was elected as Councilmember in Council District 1, Kevin Nara Park was elected as Councilmember in Council District 4, Sudhanshu "Suds" Jain was elected as Councilmember in Council District 5, Anthony J. Becker was elected as Council member in Council District 6, Hosam Haggag was elected as City Clerk, and Pat Nikolai was elected as Chief of Police, each for a four-year term ending 2024.

5. That the City does declare and determine that Measure E City of Santa Clara Transient Occupancy Tax passed with the following results: votes in favor of Measure E - 33,183; and votes against Measure E - 11,923.

6. That the Assistant City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter into the book of original resolutions.

7. Constitutionality, severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this resolution is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid for any reason such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the resolution. The City of Santa Clara, California, hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase, and word thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section(s), subsection(s), sentence(s), clause(s), phrase(s), or word(s) be declared invalid.

II
Resolution/Certifying Election Results
Rev: 11/22/17

Page 2 of 3 ends

8. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED

AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A SPECIAL MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES : COUNCILORS:

NOES : COUNCILORS:

ABSENT: COUNCILORS:

ABSTAINED : COUNCILORS :

Attachments incorporated by reference :

1. Exhibit A - Certificate of Election Results
Becker, Chahal, Hardy, Jain, Park, and Watanabe,
and Mayor Gillmor
None
None
None ~
ATTEST ~~/)
~A HOSAMHAGGAG T .. . CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA

2. Exhibit B - Santa Clara County Official Final Results Resolution/Certifying Election Results
Rev: 11/22/17

Page 3 of 3 ends

County of Santa Clara
Registrar of Voters
1555 Berger Drive, Bldg. 2
san Jose, CA 951!2
Mailing Address: P.O. 13ox 611360, San Jose, Ct\ 9SlfiH3G0 (408) 299·VOTE (8683) 866·430-VOTE (8683) FAX: (,ios) 998-7314· www.sccvote.org
December 3, 2020
Mr. Hosam Haggag, City Clerk
City of Santa Clara
1500 Warburton Ave
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Exhibit A
RE: Certification of Election Results - November 3, 2020 Presidential General Election Dear Mr. Haggag:

Enclosed are the Certificate of Election Results, Official Results, and the Statement of Votes for the contest(s) in your jurisdiction.

Pursuant to Elections Code Section 15400, the Governing Board should accept the Statement of Votes and Certificate of Election Results, and declare the totals to be the final results of the election.

Please contact Election Division Coordinator Bren Lehr at 408-282-3041 should you have questions or need anything further.

Sinc.erely,
. t2_
,/~_)
c_H~ehr
Election Division Coordinator, Candidate Services Division Enclosures
Board of Supervisors: Mike Wasserman, Cindy Chavez, Dave Cortese, Susan Ellenl)erg, s. Joseph Simitian County Executive: Jeffrey V. Smith

CER TIFIC ATE OF ELECTION RES ULTS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA )
I, Shannon Bushey, Registrar of Voters of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, hereby declare:

1. A Presidential General Election was held in the County of Santa Clara, for the City of Sa nta C lara, on November 3, 2020 for the purpose of electing One (1) Police Ch ief, One (1) City Clerk, and Four (4) Council Member s for Districts 1, 4, 5, and 6 to the Governing Board.

2. The official canvass of the returns of this election was conducted by the Office of the Registrar of Voters in accordance with the appropriate provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California.

3. The Statement of Votes Cast, now on file in my office and attached hereto, shows the number of votes for each candidate for the Governing Board of the City of Sa nta Clara and in each of the precincts and that the total shown for each candidate are true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and Official Seal this 3rd day of December 2020.

A.iL,fJ. 41.IYl.-121\ B1..1{1,l l+------
Shannon Bushey, Registrar of Voters'./

CERTIFICATE OF ELECT ION RESUL TS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA )
I, Shannon Bushey, Registrar of Voters of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, hereby declare:

1. A Presidential General Election was held in the County of Santa Clara, in the City of Santa Clara, on November 3, 2020 for the purpose of submitting the following measure to the voters:

E To maintain and protect the level of essential city services including 9-1-1 emergency medical/disaster preparedness, police and fire protection, bicycle and pedestrian safety, roadways and storm drains, and other vital services including parks, recreation, libraries and senior services, shall a measure increasing the hotel tax rate up to 4%, generating up to approximately 7 million dollars arumally, paid only by hotel/motel guests, until ended by voters, be adopted?

2. The official canvass of the returns of the election was conducted by the Office of the Registrar of Voters in accordance with the appropriate provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California.

3. The Statement of Votes Cast, now on file at my office, shows the whole number of votes cast for Measure E in each of the precincts and the total shown is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and Official Seal this 3rd day of December 2020.

City of Santa Clara, Member, City CouncH, District 1 (Vote !oI" 1) _ Precinct
OC-09001
0009005
Countywide
Electionivide
Precinct
Vote b_y Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by ~1ail
Total
Ele-c.tionwide - Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
P,ednct
Vot!~t~~~I
Total
Cumulative - Total.

Cou~~vide - Total
Congressional District
17th Congressional District
0009001
0009:JOS
Pr\:Cinct
Vat! ~Y ~a:1 _
Tota!
Precinct
Vo!e by Ma:I
Total
17th Congressional Distrk.t -
Tota!
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Cumulative• Tota!
Congressional District - Total
State Senator
10th Senatorial District
0009001
000900S
Precinct
~?te_ ~~-~~i~
Tota!
Precinct
V~!~ by "''.al(.

Tota!
10th Senatorial Di!,tricl - Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
To!al
Cumulative - Total
State Senator. Total
Ml!:mber Of the State
Assembly
25th Assembly.Di5trict
0009001
0009005
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by_Mail
Total
25th Assembly District - Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
v~!e_~~1~~1
Total
Cumulative - Total
MerJlbei-· orthe-State ASS"ercibly··
TQtal
Board of Equalization (State) '.
state Board Of Eriu.lniatiCln ·
.,
(}009001
?re-dnc.t
Vote b>: ~~i~
Total
232
2,406
2,638
360
l,635
l,995
6,633
0 6,633,
232
2,406
2,638
360
3,635
3,995
6,633

6.633
232
2,406
~Gia'
360
3,635
3,995
6,633'
0 6,633
232
2,406
2,638
360

3.635
3,995
6,633
6,633
232
2,406
2,638
0009001
l,165
3,165
3,165
-0000005
Coun~!de
Electionwide
Precinct
Vote by Mcf!
Total
74, "38~14%'---
·99·1 46.97%
120: 61.86%
1,119 53.03%

0.00¾
+-o,- o.00¾
--·------,--·----------------------- ·----·-------
1,065 46.22% 1,239' 53.78%' 0 0.00¼
19•1
2,110,
2,304
4,703 Precinct:
-·v-ot·e bYM~i1(·-
.. -~~~'- -~-~94%·__ 156; 49.06%1 0 0.00¾, 318,
1,483 _•6_.2_1% ____ 1_.1_26~·-s_i._19_%-'-! ____ o __ n_oo_¾ ___ i209\ 4,703 4,703 Total
E!ectionw:de • Total
Cumulative
---iµs 46.64% 1,882· SJ 36% 0' 0.00% l 527

46.48% 3,121: -5352%, --- 0 -- o_oo¾ ---- --:s-:si,--7,868 2.710 Cumulative
-------' ------------ ' ____ __c__ __ c__
. ···-·-------!~~~~-----~---~ o'--• --'--'--­
Vote by Mai[! o.

Total, o;- -
------------- ------'---'-------
. ~-----~~~~lative__:_!~~~- o .• ________ oc_; __ -'-------'--- 7,868 ~ountyNide_-_To_tal) ·--· --~-!2.o: .. _ 46.48%
·0009001
3,165; Precinct' 74 38.14%' 120i 61.86%'
-------- --·---------

0.00¾

0.00%·,

0.00%'

3.165 Vote by Ma:I 991 46.97% 1,11s: 53.03%
l,165_ Total, - 1,065 46.22%
---···-----~ ~-------·----~----
1,239; 53.78%
•0009005
4,703
4,703
4,703
7,868
Precinct'
Vote by Mail
Total
17th Ccngressiona! District -
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
o, Vote by Mail
Total'
Cumulative- Tota!'

7.868· Congressional District- Total
162 S0.9-4% 156, 49.06%
1,483 46.21%_ ·- 1,1201 - ~3.79%~--------·--
-1.645~ . 46.64% 1,S82 53.36%. 0
. ·--------- -----------------------··---·-·
2,710 46.48% 3,121: 53.52%' 0
"---------------~- ·----~--·-- ·----------
0 O·
o,
0::- ---, • ---
o' s-•-~---~----
000%;
QOO¾

0.00%

0.00%
2,710 46.48% 3,m;- 53.S2½> o: 0.00%
'
' • I State Senator
10th Senatorial District
. . ----, ----~---: -----,) ------ !'-------·--
;0009001
3,16S
3,165'
-P·redn~t;­
Vote by Mail
-------
7 ◄: 38.14% 120; 61.56%'. o: 0.00¾'
991' 46.97%.' 1, 119,! 53.03%). ·--~-~:..~~----
3,165 ... !~~L-------~_::6__:i__ 46.22% ___ 1_,2_39~•-s_i._18_%0: _____ o,'-- o.00% 0009005
4,703 Precinct 162 50.94%
7,868,
3,165
3,165'
3,165
Cumulative
Cumulalive
Ass_emblv
25th Assembly District
000900i - -- --
Precinct
Vote by Mail
TotaJi
74 38.14%
991 46.97%
i.oiX 46-22%
--·- --------------
120
1,119,
1,2.39:

49.06%'

61.86%

53.03%/

53.78%

0.00%
o, 0.00%
-----------------
0 0.00%
0 S,831
194
2,110
2,304
318
3,209
3,527
5,831
318"
o,
194.
2,110
-2.i64'
,0009005
4,703· Precinct; 162 50.94%; 156'. 49.06%; O 0.00% 318
Voteb';Mi'!il' 1,483 46.21%, - -~~~~:. 53.79%, ~- o· O.OO"i: 3,209 4,703' 4,10/" ·------~~~(~--~ 1,645; __ ~~~~: __ 1,SB2i 5336%: o' 0.00¾· 3,527· 25th Assembly District- Tota!i --~:~~~~~6.48%; 3,121 ! 53.52%'. _ . a: 0.00%! 5,831: 7,868:
·---· ----------------- ------: o· 0.00%: s,631
: Board of Equalization (State) !
: state Board Of Equalization ! ------'---'-----'--
, #2 ___ j
;0009001 --·------------·---- i_
3,165· 74 38.14% 12.0, 61.86%' 0.00% 1941 ?redncti
V~te-b'Jt-.-1ail'. ----- ----- . -------- -----------~--- 0 0.00%' 2,110· 3,165,
3,165 Total:
991 46.97%: 1.119; 53.03%'
4622%'. ---,-,2-39~!-s-3.-78_%_· - ---~---··---~-
0 0.00%' 2,304,
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 73 of 120
0C09005
Precinct
Vote b~ Mail
Total
·stale a<:larC(df EQuiifization ;;z·.----
_Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
3,995: 4,703' Total 1,645
6,633; 7,868: State Board Of Eci~atizatio;:t:it___ __ 2,710 Cumulative
1Cumulative -----
---------------------·
Precinct 0. O Precinct

50.94% 156 49.06%

46.21% 1,726 53.7SC/4

46.64% 1,882 53.36%
~otebyMail _____ _-co:~---~;_____ Vote by Mail_ o ___________ _ Total o'. oi Total: O· o
Cumulative~ Total 01 01 Cumu!ati-7e~~~~~~------------- 0 1 - o· --
Board of EciUa!izat:101'\ (sta·ter:: , s d f E r · (St t ) 1 Tota! 6,633; 7,868; oar o qua 1zat1on ~:t:)
-- --·----- ,-----<
l City City
2,110: 46.45%
City of Santa Clara City of Santa Clar! ___________ ; __ _ 0009001 10009001 ' ' .
0009005
Precinct
Vote bt~~~-­
Total
Precinct
74: 38.14%
___ --~4__~
1 ~ ____ i-1is-:~~---------~~~-1:!1~~~?-~;~5_91% ·
2,638' 3,165: Total' 1,065 4622%
-- ------~---,------------------------ -
'0009005
360 4,703 Precinct 162 50.94%
Vot~ b~ Mai! 3,635 4,703 Vote by Mai(
Total ··· --·- 3,995_____ 4,703 T0t~i' -

1.483 46-21%
i,645- 46.64%
City of Santa Clara. Tota! 6ili-----7,ees . City of Santa Clara -Total; 46.-18% Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
__ ~~t.e by '.~1~i'.

Total
Cumulative - Total
~~ty • Total
Unlncorpora_te~ Area
Unincorporated
0009001
Precinct
y~~1: __ by_ I-!_~)~ -
Total
0009005
----- -------------
Cumulative
Cumu!at;ve
Precinct -- -------~----- -O Vote by Mail
Total,
-· -----·- ---- . ----- ------ - -

0. Cumulative• Total;
6,633 1,a6a City-Total 2,710 46.48%
Unincorporated Area .. -------------· - ...... ---··------·-· ___ U~incorporated __
0009001
232 3,165 Precinct 74 38.14%

46.97¼

46.22%
-----2,406 3,165 _____ Vote by Mail'
2,638 J,165
360
3,635"
4,703
4,703
Total
Precinct'
Vote by Mail'
3,995: _ 4,703[ ------~---·-~--:~~~11'
6,633' 7,868: Unincorporated - Total'
- ---. --·----. --
Cumulative
991
162., 50.94%
1,483 46.21%
1,645 46.64%
'i;i10' 46.48¼
Precinct
Vote by Mall
Total
Unincorpo~!t~ - Tota!
Cumulative
Cumulative
----- ------------------------------------------
--------- ;cum_u~~~~------ __ i __ _
Precinct o· Precinct
12oi 61.86%
1,119' 53.03%
- -i239;-· 53.78%
156: 49.c6%· ·
1,726, 53.79%
1,882' 53.36%
3,121' 53.52%
J,121 53.52%
120 61.86%
1,119 53.03%
1,239 53.78%
156 49.06%
1,726: 53.79¾
1,882 ·53~36;,("
-.(121' 53.52¼
--- .. ------·------
- -·--·- -------------
Cumulative - Tota! 0 Cumulative - Total
------
Unincorporated Area• Tota! 6,633 7,868, Unincorporated Area -Total 0 0

2.710 46.48%
0 o·
3,121 53.52%
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM

0.00% 318
000¼ 3,209

0.00% 3,527
000% 5,831
000¼ 5,831

0.00¾ 194

0.00% 2.110
000¾ 2,304

0.00% 318
000¾ 3,209

0.00¼ J,527
000% 5,831
000% 5,831
000% 194

0.00% 2.110

0.00¼ 2,304

0.00% 318
000% 3,209

0.00¾ i521

0.00% 5,831

0.00% 5,831
Pige: 73 of 120
City of Santa Clara, Member, City_C{)uncil, Distr~c_t: 1 (Vote for District
Countywide
Electionwide
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Electionwide - Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative - Total
Countywide • Total
Congressional District
17th Congressional District
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
17th Coi-.gressional District·
Tota\
Cumulative
Precinct
vo.te -~y-~ail
Cumulative - Total
Congressional District• Total
State Senator
10th Senatorial District
Precinct
_Y_o_t~. bJ !-:!~i1
10th Senatorial o;strkt - Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mall
Cumulative - Tota!
State Senator - Total
Member of the State
Assemblv
25th Assembly District
Precinct
Vote by Mail
25th Assembly o;strkt - Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative - Total
·r;.1ember of the S'tate ·Asse"rribly".

J_o_tal __
Board of Equalization (State)
State Board or Equalization
#2
Precinct
Vote by Mail
State Board Of Equalization #2:
_Total_
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumu!ati\le - Total
Board of Eqllaliiatfon (Staief •
Total
City
City of Santa Clara
Precinct
~ate. ~Y Mail
City?! Santa Clara - T:1tal
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mall
Cumulative - Total
City· Total
592
6,041
6,6.33
6,633
592
6,041
6,633,
6,633'
S92
6,041;
6,633
o·
6,633
592
6,041

6.633
6,633
S92'
6,041
6,633'
6,633
S92
6,041
6,633
o'
6,633
7,868
7,868
7,868
7,868
7,868
Cou~!~,..i~~
Electionwide -------- ---------------- i __ - -- ------ - Precinct'
Vote by Mail;
- -E!ecti~n,,:.,;dO - T~ta[: -
236 46.09¼: 276' 53.91% 0 0.00% 512,
5,319; 2,474 46.51% 2,845
2,710 46.48% 3,121
17th Congressional District
Preci~ct' - --------236:-4·6.09%t 276!

53.49% 0.00%

53.52%' o: 0.00% - 5,831.

53.91%! 0.00%:
o·
o,
S,831
512,
7,868: Vote by Maili 2,474. 46.51¼' 2,845] 53.49%\ 0, 0.00%' - -5,319' ;,~6$~--17thC011QrEssiona1 District-I 2,110: · -4-6.48•¼/ - · 3,121; · 53.52%: o: 0.00%i S,831 Cumulative
Tnt;:,lf _ ' ' , /
- ! ! : -- l
Pr:~~'?_~-~----- --o: ~-" ! o; oi
I
o
Vote by Maili ·--·-----~:.______ o: _! ____ ~'.--. __ .. [_.__ 0 Cumulative - Totali O O' 0 o: _______ _, ______ , ·------~---- ' __ 7,8681- - Congression"a1 District· Totali 2,710' 46.48% 3, 121\ 53.52%; 7,868
7,868
7,868
--•--------~-
State Senator i
10th_~-~~~~~~~!:!'!:~_! __ _
Precinct:

Vote by Maili
10th 5.::natorial Di5trict -Total:

Cumulative i
236' 46.09%!

2.474 46.51%: -
2,710 46.48%'
~----- - --- I .
2~~i. 53.91%'. o: 0J)O%!
2,8451 53.49% 0.00%'.
3,121\ 53.52%• 0.00%
s12·
5,319'
Precinctj
vOte by M~il'
·o,-------- --- - o· - ---
0 7,868
7,868
7,868
·-----·------Cumulative - Tota!
State 5-~~~tor· -· T;tai'. ·
·,:.1emher-ott'hes1a-te· -
Assem~lv
25~~ Assemb~~ -~(s!ri~!
Precin-~t:

V~te by Mail'
Cumulative
___ ------ --~'- - - ·- -0,
0 0
2,710
-·----,---------·-----~.-----

46.48% 3,121: 53.52% 0 0.00%
' ---"--~----·.----- .--
- ' ' -- ·--------- --- ·-- ------------·- - ----------- - 236 46.09¼ 276: 53.91%' 0 0.00%_
2,474 46.51% 2,845:- 53.49% - 0 0.00%
----------------. ----- -------·--- -
2,7101 46.48% 3,12\ 53.52% 0 0.00%
-P;e~i;{~i1 0
Vote by Mail I O;
5,831
512
5,319
5,831,
CUmu1~-t~~·~ T;;ial· - o ______ o; ~------------- o:
7,~~~1!A~·~~b~-;-~f-th~.$~~~!::~~~s-·------2.7101 -~6.48% 1 __ --~~1: ~ 53.52~:
1 _____ '.----~~~, ------~5~~3~;
Board of Equalization (State) ! '. I
State-eoarcron·c1ua11zat1on-·i- -- - - , ~
1 -- • -- :
7,868: .#l_ Precinct~- 236; 46.09% -·-·l,!:6S.i,-_5
5 3
3 ._9
4 19%%:, __ - -o:--0.00"/4.- 512
7,86s' Vote by Mail: 2ii4: 46.51% o--. 0 0.00%: 5,319'
7,868 State Board CiEqu-aiiZati0~#2.--- 2,110: 46As% l,121, 53.52% a: ·0.00% -------i8i1:
_ Tr,t,oll_ _, ___________________ ! -----'-------------·--· Cumulative I i ; .
~ ' ~ -
: 0 0
- 0 0 0,
---------- -- ----
7,868
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumvlati;;: T~~I,
B~a;d ~i tC\USn;a"ti~~-fs-t;t-~)·-: - 2,710 46.48% 3,121, 53.52%'. 0: 0.00% 5,831, l··
City of Santa Clara
7,868 Precinct 236 46.09% 276: 53.91% ··-o• o.ati/4'
-·· - ... ------ --- ~---·-------
7,868 Vote by Mall 2,845 53.49% o· 0.00%
7,s68·--"-City·OfSa'ntaC!ara--TOtal,- - - · - --- 0 --
Cumulative
Precinct
·--------- --Vote by Mail. 0
Cumulative-Total, 01
7,868 Ci~._. ~~-la!/ 2,110 ------~---------'--•----==:cc: ___ ---------'-'-----' S12
5,319_
12/2/2020 7:28:39 PM
·Page: 74 Of 120
City of Santa Clara, Member, City Council, District 4 (\Tote for_ 1)_ District
.. ~o~nt_Y'-':ide
Electionwide
Precinct
Vot~ ~x_-~~~~
Electionwide - Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative - Tota\
County.,ride • Total
Congressional District
17th Congressional District
Precinct
Vote by Mail
17th Congressional District • ·
_Jqta)_
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative - Total
Congressional District - Total
State Senator
10th Senatorial District
Precinct
Vote by Mail
10th Senatorial District• Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative - Total
State Senator - Total
Meffibei of the State
Assembly.
25th Assembly District
Precinct
Vote by Mail'
25th ~sembly District - Tota!
Cumulative
Precinct
___ ~o~e _b!_~ail
Cumulative - Total
MefTlber of lhe state "AsSemb!:,'
Total
Board of Equalization (State}
State Board Of Equalization
#2
Precinct
Vote by Mail
State Board Of Equalization :12
Tota!
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative - Total
Board of Equalization (Stal.e} -
Total_ .

City
City o! ~!~t_a_ ~~ara
Precinct
Vote by Mail
512
7,424
7,936
7,936
512:
7,424
7,936
o,
7,936"
512
7,-t24
7,936
7,936
512
7,424
7,936
7,936
512
7,42.4
7,936
7,936
512

7.424
City of Santa Clara - Total 7,936;
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mai(
Cumulative - Total
City-10:ar
o.
~
.i ~
~-~District
: i : _ Cou~tywi~e __ _
Electionwide
1 I _______ i ________ l ----··- ----~---
' I I
9,469; p;~J,~ctr 2sa; 62.62% 154' '3738%' ---~---------- . 412 -- ' . 56.89%', 2·,73-9-f,, 4-3'.·1·1·%-:,.- o, 0.00%
1 I 9,469, _____________ -Vot~-~YMa~; 3,615'. __ _,_ ____ 01~_0_.00_'_¾~--- -~~~ 9,469, ------· E~:ctiom~ide - Total~-·------- 3,873!-- 57.24%~ ______ 2.89i 42.76%!- _______ ?:--~~: _ Cumulative · · ; I I
o· Precinct) - o: ! o! ------l ----o-'-: --~------ -
-·---. ---------------Vote by Mai(-- -o;-· --ot --- --~ O'. -·--------~umul~tive-Tota1: o: OI o;
9,469 Countywide-Totali --~·~!! ____ :2:~~~: _____ ---~~!~L__!~!~~---__ --~; ___ 0_:00%j' Congress~~~a_l_~~rict _ i ---------~-
1 17th Congressional District j · ___________________ I-------------~------•- i ---------•·--• 9,<69,
9,469

9.469:
9,469
9,469·
9,469
()
9,469
9,469'
9,469
9,469
Precinct: 258
1 62.62% 1S4i 37.38%'. 0 0.00%
1 1
____ Vote by_ Man; ____ _
171h CongressionJl District-!
Tn.!;,\i
Cumulative f
Vote by MaiJ,
Cumulative - Total:

Congressional District - Tota(
State Senator
10th Senatorial District
Precinct'
Vote by 1.11li1 ·
10th Senato;i-c1I Dist~ici: T;tal
Cumulative
Preci~ct -
3,615,_i _5_6 __ 8_9%_' ___ 2._7_39_,._, _<3_.1_1_%.__, ____ o__,; __ o._oo_%j 3,8731 57.24% 2,893! 42.76%! Oi 0.00%
o; '
o· ' ------' ----~-~----! --------- -a: 01 o,
3,873 si.2<1% 2,e93i --4i76%'. o 0.00%
' :
- - . -----, ---- --
258 62.62% 1S4 37.38% 0 0.00% ____________ ,_ - .
3,615 56.89% _2.1_,~'-- 43.11%, ------~o __ ~:001,:
3,873 57.24% 2,893) 42.76%; 0 0.00%·
- __ J -------~----~---------
□: 0
Vote by Mai!' _______ ?: ____________ ---~L__ ---~-- _____ _ Cumulative - Total: O
--- -------~-------- ------- _, _____ _
State Senator-Total, ·----~~!~:-~-7~~%- ____ 2,893; 42.76%! ----~•~-~-~%\. -~,eml.ier·or the-state-----1-- ___ Assembly_
2SthAssc~blyOistrict __ , ------~---------,.~-------: ___ 1 _________ -·-,- -----·--- _ -----------~~:c~~:~: _ -------~~----~~~~~------- 154i 37.38%) 0.00%, ----------- - Voteb;•Mai!;
25th Assembly-District• Total'.­
Cumulative

56.89% 2,739 43.11%' 0 o.oow
--- ----------
2,893! 42.76%j Qi 0.00%1
. ' . - 1- ----7- ----------,------. ' J ______ _
o, o'
o; --·--o;···
o· ,
6,766;
6,766:
412'
6354:
6,766
o;
0 6766,
412

6.3S4
6,766
0 6,766
412
6,lS4
6,766
9,469 · Member of the State Assembly ,
J"r.,b\~
' Board of Equalization (State) 1
- Stiit(;so~ird'Of E(IU'aliZatfoii
_#2
2,893: ·42:,-6%: - - 0' 0.00% 6,766
9,469
9,469
Precinct/
Vote by Mail:
;,~69 -State Board-Of EQ~~!iiatiOn P2 _:
o,
o·
9,469
9,469'.
9,469 -
9,469
__ .T~t:ol·.

Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mal!,
·· ~,~m-~l~tw~·-T~t-aii
Board of Equa!izaiiOn {State) -i
- ·-~i_t!
City of Santa Clara_
2S8 62.62%
3,61S. S6.89%:

I
-~--
154; 37.38%;
2,7391 -43~1%1-··
I
0 0.00"/4'.

0.00% ---- ------------· ·~--·------- - ----·--·-----
3,873, 57.24% 2,893i 42.76%; 0 0.00%
412
6,354
6,766
12/2/2020 7:28:39 PM
• Page: 74 ·of 120
City of Santa Clara, Member, Ci!Y Council, District 4jy<>_te.!<>EJ-) Precinct
0009151
0009157
0009163
0009166
Countywide
Electionwlde
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total,
Electio:-w1ide - Tota!
Cumulative
Cumu!atr,e
Precinct
Vote~~ ~lail
Total
Cumulative - Total
County'.•,1de - Tota!
Congressional O:i~~r_i~!-
17th Congressional District
0009151
0009157
0009163
0009166
Precinct
Vote by_ Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote ~y-~al!
Total
Precinct
Vo~e ~/ Mail __
Total
Prec.inct
Vote b; Mail
Total
17th Congresslorial Dfstrkt •
Total
Cumulatlve
Cumulative
Precinct
yote by Mc!H
Total
Cumulative-Total
Congressional District - Total
State Senator
10th Senatorial District
00091S1
0009157
0009163
0009166
P1ednc1
V~t~ by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Prednct
Vo1eby Ma!l
Total
V~teby.MaiJ·.

Total
10th Senatorial District~ Tota!
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by M~i!_
Tota!"
Cumulative~ Total
State Senator• Total
_ A.s.semblv_
25th Assembly District
171
2,269
2,440
214

2.751
~965
55 1,212
1,267
12:

1.192
1,264
7,936'
7,936
171
2269
2,440
214
2,751
2,965
55 1,212

1.267
72 1,192.
1,264
7,936
),936
1)1

2.269
2,440
214

2.751
2965
55,
1,212'
t,267
7,936
2,9S t'.
2,951
2,9S1
_ ~~-~ntY:"~i~~
Elec-tionwide
0009151
Precinct'
. ·vote-by M~ii
Total.
0009157
--- :--------~---·-
0 0,00%1 92, --68.15%' ----~ 31.85%;.
1,137; 59.72%' 767: 40.28%; 0 0.00%
___ 1,~~:__~o_.2_1%~·----s1-lo: 39.73%i ____ o~_o_.am<--',, __ ,., ! , __ ,_' "-~-,,,-,,
"i3'5'
·1,9041
~039
3,619 Precinct.' 106 _ 6~._9_1~1- 61) 3G.09%/ o: 0.00%' ~~~i 3,619 v-;.te'byM4~" ""1,i6a:· 58.24%, 981 I 41,m,1 'oi - o:00%',' 2,349, 3,619 Total; 1,476'. 58.62%: 1,042: 41.38%j o: 0.00%' 2,518:
:0009163 ( II / ------'---~I---·---~
1,454'. - · Pr_~in_~( _______ -_21 ss:a2¾I ~----- 19\_ 43.18%; _____ 0j o.00%1___ 44, 1,454·:-- Vote by Mail: 563; 52.91%1 so,j 47.09"/4j o: O.Wh! 1,064 1,,154 - Total; · 588 53.07¾! 520/ 46.93%) o; 0.00%: 1, 108! !0009166 ! , , 1 I
:::::' ·~"-·v~t~p~:0~/ ···· · ~~J !~::::! .. ~~f::f -:7:: ::~f 1 9,469 - _ -~-- .~~t~~~~~e • To~a1; ___ _:_a!_~; ~?.24%: _____ ~!:893i 42.76%: oj ___ 0.00%1 --------6~766' Cumulativ:umulative ·'· .~.~ j'~~-~J.=~~::::i··:::::~:::::·L_=I - o; Precinct! o; 0i 0 ---6
-~~~:-~~~- .. o; ___ ) --~-~- __ oL o:
o,
9,469
Total! ·-1f" 01 o;
Cumulative - Total' o' ·-· oi .... _ .. , .... ,,,, __ o --==:::::_ Countywide -Total; 3.873· 57.24%, 2,893: 42.76%[ 0 0.00% Congressional District
17th Congressional District
' .
' i
I --"- i ----------,·-0009151
----------~i_ ·---·-----·-
2,951 Precinct, 9! __ !~s~--------- __ 43i _ 3"liS%! _ ______ o: 0.00%1 2,9s1 Vot;by-fX;ii,.. - 1.137: 59.72% 767! 40.28% 1 0.00%:
2,951: -T~-t~J; - - 1.iiV-60.21¾• a,o·-39.1~-----·-- o --·0:00%:
' 1 ·
3,619,
3,619
3,619'
0009157
.. ,00-09163
Precinct 108 63.91%;
Vot;by-,-.1~ii;-·- -- ----1)6$: 58.24%'
Total 1,476: 58.62%:
--61-: 36:os%j o'
9S1 i 41.76%: 0
-- 1,042! 41.38%' 0

0.00%,
0,00%
0,00%
- 1,~541
1,454!
Precinct' 2s: 55.82%: t9i 43.18%: o· 0.00%1
----v~t;byM~--- s63: s2.91%1 so, 1 47.o9%i o' 0.00%:
10009166
1,445: -------------
1,445'

1.4451
9,469'
Total; ·~·:~~.5~~::::07%! 520~693%[ o: 0.00%
Prednctj 33. 51.56%: 31! 48.44%; Oj 0.00%:

VotebyMail: 5471 52.75¾! 490! 47.25%. 0.00%~
Totaq ,, __ ,,5~,,52~!%! .. siil 47.3£%:•,,,-~== oi o~:_ 6,766
,is
1,904'
2,039'
169
2,349:
2,518
1,108
1,037
1,101:
6,766 lith Congress!on~l QJ;t;i(~r--. 3.873 5724%
1 2,8931 42.76%! O 0.00%
____________ Tot;>\·---_____ ·---- ___ , ----------~
____ ---~u~u~a__!~! ------·-- 1 _
:cumulative
Precinct;
·y;·te by Mall;-
-- - ---~ --
.. - O:" ,J_,_ ____ o: __ _
Totals 0, o] __ _
o'
Cu~~1;ti~e-~TQ{~'-- -o~ ------- o; , ----~l- ,
9,469 . -COng·;s;iO~al Distri-,t-Total: 3,s13: 57.24% is93: 42~76%1 o 0.00%; State Senator
10th Senatorial District
0009151
o·
0 0
0 6,766,
2,951
2,951'
2,951
PreCi~Ct'
·vot~ -by M;il:
92 68.15% '"43r 31.85%, o 0.00% 135:
1,137 59.72%: -----:~~~~-3~~~-------· -~---~~. -- 1,904, Total' 1,229 60.27¾ 810" 39.73%i O 0.00% 2,039
:0-009157 -
3,619'
3,619
3,619'
·--·-, •-.-- i-•·--·----·--, ,.,_•,,,,,,
_____ !~':~~~-----~!~~=~2~: ---- -- ------61: ·-36:09%f-·- ------·--o.00%-:-·- vote by Mail\ 1,368 58.24%' 9811 41.76%' 0 o.w/4,-•
-·- Total: 1,476 5$.62%1 1,0421 41.38%; OOO¾i
--~:=~~=~-~~-·-~- I 1
:0009163
1,454' Pr_ec_inc_,~: ____ 2_s 56.82%; 191 43.18%, O.OO%i 44; ----------~- -v~tebyMailL 563 -- 52.91%:--· -sm1 47.09%: o', _o_.00%_'~ __ 1_,06~-4· 1,454) 1,454' ____________ ,:,o_t,_,; ____ se_,_5_3_.o_7%-+1' ____ 52_0,;,I _•6_,9_l"_•'-----o-+; __ o._~,I___ 1,106; ·--"~ .. ·-------.. ! I
Prednr:t 1 1,445:
1,~~~L Vote-by t:t~il~- 547 52.75%1
1 ~:~~~:--~-------- Total, 5801 52.6S%[
9,469 '. 10th Senatorial District-Totali 3,873! 5724%i
: Cumulative L _ ----~;
33 51.56%: 31 i 48.44%:
521 j 47 32%: --
2,893i 42.76%i
' I

0.00%1 6,)66!
Cumulative i i --- ,--
o: --·- -~--- Pre<inct! ·-o:·--·----------O-"j---i-----Oi __ __!, ____ , er- Vote 1:;y Mall: . -~'----·-·--- o: o: 1
1 o:
0: -·- Total; o o: o'
a: Cumulative -Totaf a~; __ .L. ____ O -----~ \---- -- - o' -- - 9,469 -Stale Sen-aior • T~tali 3,873! -57.24%1
... ·MembeT of the State ! I i
Assembly_. ·
2,893, 42.76%' 0.00%
2~th-A5se~bly District··-
L o:
0 6.766'
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 74 of 120
0009151
0009157
Precinct
Vot_:_?Y ~!a_il
Total
171. -------------
2,269
2,440:
2,951
~951
2,951
0009151
i0009157
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
1 92 68JS%
1,137 59.72%
1,22~ 60.27%
--------
43 31.85%
767 4028%
810 39,73½.

Prednct 214' 3,6191 Precinct 108 63.91% 61 36.09%,

41.76%

41.38%1 ---
_ Vote by Mail ______ ~~-----------~:~~'...__~---- __ Vote by Mail~! ___ 1_,36_8 58.24% 9811 Total 2,965, 3,619° Total 1,476: 58.62%. 1,042
0009163
0009166
Precinct
Vo~e b~ ~a~l- _
Total
Precinct
_ --~~t~ ~y Mail
Total
I ;0009163
55' 1,454'
----~--
----~; __ ------ 1,~54: --
1,267 1,454"
' f0009166
72'
Precinct:

Vote by Mail]
Totalj
Precinct'
-~~~~;~-- 1,«s; ______ v_o1_e...:h>_' M_a_H1
1,264
7,936'
1,445· Tota!:
9,469'. 25th Assembly District- Tota!i
25' 56.82%'
563' 52.91%
588 53.07%
33 51.56%
547 52.75%
19, 43.18%
5011 47.09%
520' 46.93%
-- ----- -31' 48.44%
490: 47.25%.
. --·------·-- -
580 52.68% 521 47.32%.
3,873 57.24% 2,893; 42.76% 25th Assembly District - Total Cumulative
Cumulative
1 Cumulative ------ -- ---------:-,,-,.-,--.cc:.c.c.:.::_:..:_ __ [Cumulati_'ve _____ __J
Prednct
vo:e b~~I __
Total
Cumvlative - Total
Member of th: Statt?-AssE!inbty ·
Total
Board of Equalization (State)
Si:.1te B0ard Of Equalizatiori
0{;09151
OC09157
OC09163
0009166
#2
Precinct
_ Vote _bt Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote b~ ~a~
Total
Precinct
Vote ~~,'.,~a_i~
Total
Precinct
V~te by Mail __ _
Total
Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Cumulative - Total
BOard ofEquali"z"atiofl .(State} -
_Total
City
City of Santa Clara
OC-09151
OC09157
Precinct
Vote by '..-1ail
Total
Precinct
_--~~~~by M_al!
Total
O· ----------- ----'----- -- Precinct·
Vote b_y ~-~1~: __
Total:
, Cumulative - Total;
. - --· ------- - --
7,936 9,469 Member of the State Assembly; ··ia73 57.24% 171
2,269
2,440
214
2,751
2,965
55 2,951
2,951
2,951
3,619
3,619
3,619
Tnt:al.

Board of Equalization {State} ,
state Bo.ird Of Equalization
- -·-------- #l. __ ~~-- -
00091S1
i00091s1
,0009163
Prednct, 92 68. t S%
-~~:e ~-~~;__ 1,137 59.72%
Total 1,229 60.27%
Precinct.

Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct'
108 63.91%
1,368
1,476

58.24%

58.62%
o,
0 t893, 42.76%
43: 31.85%
767, 40.28%
810< 39.73%
61; 36.09%
981
1,042

41.76%

41.38%
19 43.18%.
1,212 1,454 Vote by Mall 563. 52.91% 501 47.09%
1,26_7 __ ---1-,4-54-.---- ------~- Total ______ 588 ___ 53.07%----·--· ·s20' 46.93% - -=--------'------------'--------------- ------
72 1,192
1,264
7,936
0009166 ' '
-------- --------- 31 ___ 4S:44%:· 1,445
1,445
Predna
Total: 1,445
9 ,4
6 g'~S_ta_te~8-oa-,d~O~f~E-qv-,-Hz_at_lo_n_•~2
1 ·
____ __J,nt;,,I~---
Cumulative
Cumulative
33 51.56%
547 52.75% 490 47.25'¥.a
5B0 52.68% 521 _ 47.32%
3,873 57.24% 2.893 42.76%
---~-------~--------------
o,
0 0
7,936
171 ·
2,269
2,440
214
0 Total!
Cumu!atiVl:! ~ Tota!

9.469 Board of Equalization (State) -
__ . _ ~··----______ City -----·-··-
2,951
2,951
2,951
--~i~r o~ ~~~~~ ~~~~
0009151
0009157
Precincti
Vote by Mall,
Total,
3,873 57.24%
92 68.15%

1.137, 59.72%
· 1,229,--60.27%
2,893 42.76%
43 31.85%
767 '40.28%
a10: 39.73%
3,619' Precinct; 108 63.91% - - -61' 36.09¾
. --~------------- ----------------------- ---~
2,751 3,619' Vot~ by Mall; ~- 1,368 58 24% 981 41.76%.
2,9Gsl .. 3,619;_____ Total: 1,476 ~~~~~--- __ ~ i042: 41.38%' ;0009163 0009163
----··p;;;t_____ ssi 1,4S4; -----P-,e-cln-,{;-----2.s 56.82% 19 43.18% 501, 47.09%
520 46.93%
Vote ~Y ~ail---1-,2-12: · 1,45-1: -----~-=--b_y_M_ail' ____ s~--~2.91%_ Tota! 1,267 1,454: Tota( 588 53.07%'
--·-----------·
0003166 !0009166
Precinct
--·--------~---:--
72 1,445: Precinctl 33 51.56%
------'----'----~ -----
V~te by Mail ----· _ _ 1,192: 1,445 Vote by Mail 547 52.75% ---- ---~~-----------------
Tota!
Ci~~! _Santa Clara- To~~-1." ~::::! ;::::: c·'",ty-o--cf-:cS,-n<-,~Cl~ara--~::::: 3,:!~: :~::::
' Cumulative
31: 48.44%
490 47.25%:
521, 47.32%
2,893 4t76%
Cumulative
Cumulative
-------------------------------·--- --- - ·---·-··--~--------- Precinct
_ Vet~ b>'.__!~~-i~ _
Total
Cumulative - Total
j Cumulative
o' o'
------°'-- ____ v_ot_e b_y_M_a_H· __ _
o· o_ Tota[!
----~----C-v-mu!ative-Tota\
1 1-----
_____ 0~•To_t~. 7,936 9,469 Oty-Total: 3,873 57.24%
Unlnco~orated A~!~-
Uni?~o~~~!ated
0009151
0009157
Precinct
Vote by Mail ..

Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
171
2,269
2,440
214
~751
Unincorporated Area
, _______ Unincorporated~--_
0009151_ -----·- ---- -- ~i --

2.951 Precinct
3,619
3,619
0009157
VotebY"Mai,_-­
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
92 68.15%
1,137 59.72%
1,229 6027%
108' 63.91'½
1,368 58.24%
2,893, 42.76%
43 .. 31.85%'
767: 40.28%
810 39.73%
61 36.09¼
981 41.76%

0.00--½
o.oo½

0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%.

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%.
0,()()3/;

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
000¾

0.00½

0.00¾

0.00%

0.0(}½,
000%

0.00¾
000%
000¼
000%

0.00¼
000%
000%
o. 0.00%
oOOr,.·
0 0,
000%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00¾

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
0,00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00¼
000%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
135
1,904
2,039
44 1,064
1,108
64 1.037
1,101
6,766
6,766
135
1,90-1
2,039
169
al49
2,Si8
44 1,054
1,103
64 1,037
1,101
6,766
6,766
135
1,904
2,039
169
2,349
~518
44 1,064
1,103
64 1,037
1,101,
6,766
6,766
135

1.904
2,039
169
L349
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
'Page: 74 of 120
0009163
0009166
Total
Precinct
Vote b~ ~~a;J
Total
Prednct
Vote by Mail
Total
Unincorporated• Total
Cumulative
Cu mutative
Precinct
~_ote b? M~!l
Total
Cumulative• Total
Unincorporated Area • Total
2,965
55 1,212
1,267
72 1,192
1,264
7,936

0. 7,936
3,619,
1,454
i,454
1,-154
1,4<!5
1,445
1,~~s_,
9,469,
0009163
0-009166
- ________ }
Precinct
Vote by Mail;
·-rot3i,-
25 563,
588
ss.62%. 1;042: 4t38u!"- o; o.oo¾ ·, -7--

56.82%' --19]- 43.18% ____ 0· 0.00¾

52.91% 501 l '17.09% 0 0.00¾
·-------·-----~-'-·

53.07% 520' 46.93¾ 0.00%
Precinct, 33 51.56%
V01eb}'Man-]____ 547 52.75% ·~-~~ 4725%·--=~-~- o, 0.00¼ Tota![ 580 S2.68%1 521 i 47.32%; 0
1 0.00'/4
--u~i~C~~i~~ted. Taj~--- 3,a13 s1.24%: 2,s93i 42.76%; o' o.00% Cumulative I i 11 , .... ---~ -·--·---
:~~~~lat~_e_ .... _L _____ ~--, ··· I ! ! :

O· Precinctj O'. QI ! o1.
vote by Man! ~--~~~~~-:-~-=-
1 --o~-----: --~ o:' -~· -·-
. CumulaHve-~::::: . -------~ ---+ J--· ' - -~i-· ---·
Uninco~po~;ted Area. T01i1'. -3:873( 57.24%;, 2893: 42 76%:- --o,,---o.00% I I ' i . j
2,518
44 1,0£4
1,108
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Ptge: 75 01 120
City of Santa Clara, Member, City Council, Dh,trict 5_<:y~te/o_r 1) District
County.vide
£1ectionwlde
Precinct
Vo~~ ~y-~ail
E!ectlonwide - Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mall
Cumulat;ve - Total
Countywide - Total
Congressional District
17th Congressional District
Precinct
Vote by Mail
17th Congressional District •
Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Ma'.!
Cumu!utive - Tot2I
Congressional D.Strict -Total
State Senator
10th Senatorial District
Precinct
Vo~e b_¥ ~a•I
10th Senatorial District• Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative• Total
State Senator- Total
Member of the State
Assemblv
25th Assembly District
Precinct
Vote by Mail
25th Assembly District. Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative - Total
Member of the State:Asse"mblY­
:rotal
Board of Equalization (State)
state Board Of Equaliziltion
.,
Precinct
Vote by Mail
State Board Of Equ-alizatiOr'l ~i2 •
Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote bj~ail
Cumulative• Tota!
Board of Equali-2:atiOr, (Siiiief-
. T_q_ta] _
C(ty
City of Santa Clara
Precinct
Vote by ~a~l _
City of Santa Clara• Total
Cumuli'ltive
Precinct
Vo~e 1?r ~1~~1-
Cumulative. Total
City-Total
8,0-19
534
7,515
8,0-19
8,049,
534
7,515
8,049
534
7,515
8,049
8,049
534
7,515
8,049
0 o·
8,049'
5,4'
7,515,
8,049'
6,049
9,610'
9,610•

9.610
0 9,610
9,610
9,610
9,610
9,610
9,610
Electionwlde ____ i
Precinct:
____ vOte bY M;itj.

Electionvlide - Total:

Cumulative
·---- ------ -
Cumulative-Total;
Coun_ty.~~de - '.~~~-'; _
Congressional District
17th Congressional District
Precinct'
V~t~-by" ~i;ii-.
17th Congressiona!-Di~-trict -.

Cumulative
Precinct;
Vote by Mail;
Congressio~~I Distrkt·-Total
Precinct,
9,610 Vote by Mail
9,610 , 16thS~nitOria1 OistriCt~-Total' ..

Cumulative
____ I _ __,____ i .
. -i36i 54.63%' 196: 45.37%: o: 0,00%
1 ----~=:!
-2,ia1t 38.41%! ______ -4;1i9; 61.59%j o: -o:00¼___ 6,120; 2,817; 39.39%' ___ 4,3l5i -~0.61%i____ o• 0.00%.
---~-:--~ -o; a' ~---~o' ---- ~-- o' ~-. ---
o.
2,817 39.39%, 4,335' 60.61%'.
,I !
-23i- 54.63% 196. 45.37%
--2,5811-- 38.41%
- 2,a17:r- -39.39%
i
o,
-- --0
---0
-4,335, 60.61%'
236 5 ◄ .63%
0·
0 o,

0.00'/4-

0.00%

0.00%
o; o.00%
-- 01 ·----- -
0 0 Q()()ll

0.IX!II
2,581 38.,41%: ... 139 61.59%, 0, O.OO'J-~i
ian, 39.39%· ◄ ,iis' io.611-· o, o.o!J%i
--•---~---j --. ---------~I ______ _
O; o·
--- ---'--
0: 0' . '
0 o:
o·
o,
7,15Z:
-· -- --~------·---~------------- ------------------ -
9,610
9,610
9,610

9.610
Stlte Senator• Total 2,!17 39.39%
-Mirii"btl°-OfiJ,-e·sit-.,ti· --~I+--
Assem~lv
25th Ass_emblr _J:?ist~i~
Precinct
Vote by Mall
2sth Assembly District·· T~til1;-
Cumulative
- . '
Precinct:

Vote by Mail
- ----- ·- ·--
Cumulative-Total'
9,610. ~iem.ber o·f the-State-AsSe~bl}';
,4,335j 60.61%: O.OOll
0,
0,
0 7,152
, Board of Equalization {State) '
Siat'e-BoarifOf Equalii3tlo_n_ .­
Pi
9,610
9,610
o:
o·
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail,
Cumulative• Total.
236 S4.63¾ 196; 45.37%:
2,S81 38.41% 4,139: 61.59%
·-z:a,'7--l9.39% --- -----:;,m,-60.61'½: ---·
0 0.0-0%
-- o, 0.00%'
0 0.00%
432
6,720_
7,152
9,610; eoard of ~~~~~a-t~~~-{~~::~~·.,_: ___ 2,a_1_,c_' _3_9,_.,_9%-:·---··_33_5_,_1 _60_.6_1%--+'I ----- -- ----~i 0.00%; 7,152· _ ___ ; _ -rni~ii;tactara __ J _______ : ___ :__ -- i -~ ,----- • ------~-

9.610:
9,610
9,610[
o·
o,
o,
9,610.

Precinct:

Vote by MaiJ:
236f 54.63%: 196: 45.37%~ o! 0.00%'. -- 432:
2,5811 38.41%' 4,B9f 61.59%! 0 1 O.W/4 ______ 6~720-.

Otyof5antaC1;;~T~tali 2,811; 39.39¾: 4,3351 60.61%; o: o.o~/4! 7,1s2· - -- -- Cumu1~ti;~--. -- [ I r- . I I I . --7
·---P,ecinctr----------o:·-•--+------ ·-----·-·o; --- -:------ 0:--1·~--- ----~:
- Vote by Mall'. 0 -··o ·--~-~, o: . --- ---- 0
Cumvlaliv;: Tota!, o, i o: -·-o:
__ 4,33sj 66.61%; ---·-·· .. -oi_?:~'. __ 1:!~_2;
12/2/2020 7:28:39 PM
Page: 75 oi 120
City of Santa Clara, Member,_CityC011ncil,District5(Vote for 1) Precinct
0009201
0009203
0009208
0009210
0009219
0009220
Countywide
Electionwlde
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by _Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by ~lail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mall
Total
E!ectionwide • Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mall
Total
Cumulative - Total
Count>:'."'1_de •_'.?!~I __ _
Congrnssional District
17th Congressional District
0009201
0009203
0009208
0009210
0009219
0009220
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
V~te ~Y Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
17th CongresSiol'lal bf strict ~
Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Cumulative• Tota\
Congressional District• Total
State Senator
10th Senatorial District
:0009201
0009203
0009208
Precinct
Vo~e b~-~ail
Total
Precinct
Vote_~y~ail
Total
Precinct
45:
720
765
107;
1,1~9_
1,266;
122'
1,784
1,906,
12 176:
188
157
2,230
2,387

8.049

8.049
45 720
765
91 ·
1,446
1,537
107
1,159
1,266
122
1,784
1,900
12 176
188
157
2,230
2,387°
0,049
8,049
45 120'
765
91 1,446'
1,537
107
I
}>i .... Precinct
C
__ j_
_ . _ ~o~n~~~i~
891,
891
891'
0009201
Electionwide
------ :----
-- _---- ___ P~e-cinct~. ___ -- __ ·221 --57.89%, _______ 1~ ___ 42.11%j -----------Q~---0.000/- 38 . __ Vote by Mail _________ 317. _ ~~.45%: _3_2_41
1 '-5_o_.s_5%~: ____ o~• _o_O_O%_; __ 641,
Total; 339'. 49.93%: 340; S0.07%: ---·---~:~· - -6-79'
I i

1.773; Precinct! 42; -i3~85%f- -361 46.lS¾i --~0: ___ ()_~~- 78 ::;;: _ __ -·-- _ Vote b\~;:: ==-:=~::::: :~:::::------ :::: . ::::::: _ _ -----~_'._ ~:: __ <::::
:00092-08 i i ! ---~--\ ,- ---
1,660: p;~ci~ct:~-- 45: _57.69%) _____ 3_31,_, _•_2._3_1%_lc_ ___ o_ci_o_.00%_.'..., _ 1,660: VotobyMail\ ·359: 34.55%: Gao; 6S.45%! ____ o~:
1,660; - ---- -Total! 404! 36.17%i 713i 63.83%f oi_ - 0.00% 1 _____ _

0.00%
(0009216 _________ i__ ----r- t , I
2,215 Precinct! 53 Ss~2ii/ -4\i 44.79-%)------ --- --·-0! ··~0.00%'_____ 9e':
2,215'
2,215
Vote by Mail! ~~~~~- 62-1: _ 33.95%:--=-- 97af 61.0s%! . __ o:'--_o._oo_¾ _____ 2:.6~~, ... '0009219
231,
231,'
231
Total;
! ·pr;d-flCt1

39.a'.%: _________ ,._02_1:...1 _6_0_.1_3%..J'l'--- o; 0.00%' 1,698 1: 11.11%
---------------- --------- --·--
0009220
~/J.10 73' 54.89% __________ __!_~---~--11% 1 ----~~- 0.00%, --- 133' 723 36.39½ 1,264\ 63.61% 0, 0.0-0%. - 1~937: 2,840

2.840
9,610
Vote by Mail
T~t;i!--
Electiorw.;ae - Total,
Cumulative
Cumulative
-Pr~inCt.-
-- ---·-···· ____ L_

0. Vote by Mail'.
1,324'
o r0t~1~ ---··-·--· , .... ~-:-~=~~-~-:----~~-~-----~-~=-----~---~--------------

0. -~~~~~~~-!0_1,_1 _________ ' o· o, ___ _

39.39%' 9,610.
,;t~-C~-n~r~~~;;n~I Ol~t~~-;~_l __ _
Countyv,ide. Tota!' ________ 2.8~7i
Congressional District
4,335:
-,
! -------,-----
0,
I i ---· ---~-~----------- ------·---- i

2.120
7,152;
7,1S2
;0009201
891/ Prednct,1
Vote by Mai(
Total
··---·-;}- 57.89%:----- 16/- 42.11'½; -------- o·---0:00%: --- ·-··-31( a9,· 317' 49.45%: 324 1 so.55%: 0.00%' 6-41
891,
:0009203
1,773:
1,773
1,773'
1,660
1,660
1,660
0009208
0009210
2,215'.
2,215
2,215
231
231.
231
2,8-10
2,840:
2,840
9,610
0009219
000.9220
42 53.85%1 36! 46.15%'. O' 0.00%
V~~e-~~~ait_ _____ --~-,-~:~~.51% =~-=-=----79of~-60A9¾:-~ 0.00% Precinc(
Vote by Mail!
To~a~i __
Vote by Mail,
Totai'
Precinct
Vote ~y _M·a-i!;-_
Total:

I ; :
45: 57.69%- 33: --42.31%: ------ oi 0.00%
359. 34.55%; 680: 65.45%1 _··_· ·_o'_ .. _o._oo_~_,
404: 36.17%
624
677

38.95%

39.87%
978
1,021

0.00%
' ---- -----~--- -61.05% 0.00%

60.13% 0.00%
i !

11.lHi'. 8; 88.89%: 0
1 /J.00% ------------ -------
42 28.97% 103; 71.03%, 0 0.00%
43' 27,92¾: 111 72.08%: 0 0.00%·
------~ --------------~------- - -
' ' .
_Pr~~i~c~[_ 73 __ 54.89~,/4:·-__ -____ 6~0L~s.11~i---- o: O.Oi)o/.;:

Vote by Mail: 723 36.39¼
1 1,264] · 63.61~1 ------~- 0.00"'/4:

Tota( ______ 796'. --~J.55%: 1,324! 62.45%/ 0) 0.00%
78 1,306
i3s4'
78:
1,039 .
... 1,117
1,602
1,698
1,9a7:
~iio'
7,152; ~~~:~~r-~::nal D~-~~:~~--- 2-817' 39.39%
1 4,335\ 60.61%! o; O.Ooa/2]
Cumulative i ,- -------·-· ---.
)Cumulative · -f-- ➔ 1
~-- ---~~~:ote~~if~~---i'___ r ·-·· ~r -;---
Oj Tota( o: oj
----~i. _________ -~~~~i~ii~~e --~~l~t! _- o; al -+---· 9,610· Congressional_ Distri~t-To~a'.I__ 2,817! 3939%! - --4,i35j 60.61%! 0.00°/4, O' -1 o:
7,152
_________ I =::--.. -- ' ! ! i .
10th Senatorial District i ! ----::~~=~==-----1
0()()9~-~---- [ ' !, __ __: ____ _
891: - --- Pr~in~tj ___ 22 57.89%; 16! 42.11%; 0.00%'
vote by Maili ------~2~; ___ •9_.4_5_%;...I ___ 3_24_'_5_o._55_% _____ o __ o_.00%~•-- 641: 891; 891
'0009203
1,773:
1,773
,:in'
0009203
1,660
Total;
Predncti
Vote by Mail:

Total
1 3<01 50.01%' o 0.00%· ... __ 61~
I ___ . '
42 ·s-3is¾! ___ ·--------·35j 46.15% ----o-··o.00%:
339 _ 49.93%1 __
S16 --~:.:~~!--___ _!~~~--~~~~----~-~~=-o··_··_--?7~
o, 0.00%· 558 4032%,
i
45 - 57.6~~ : ______ _!i_4231%- ------- 0: 0.00% ---- 78' 12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 75 of 120
0009210
_ Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
___ ~~~! bt ~1ail
Total
0009219
Precinct
-~~t: -~~!~~!I
Total
0009220
Precinct
--~~!!_~? ~ ---
Total
10th Senatorial District. Total
Cumulative-_______________
Cumulative
Precinct
_,_v_~!~ ~r~~~I
Total
Cumulative - Total
State Senator - Total
Member of the State -- ~
Assembly
25th Assembly District
0009201
0009203
0009208
0009210
0009219
Precinct
~~~e b~_Mail
Total
Precinct
_ ~ote by Mail
Total
Precinct
V~!! ~y-~}l!~ _
Total
Precinct
vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
_ Vote bX t,!a_i!
1,159
1,266
122
1,784
1,906
1,660
1,660
i0009210
2,215'
Total
- -j
Precinct
2,215 Vote by Mail'
359 34.55%
..:O:i- 3617%
si ss.21%,
624 3895%
2,215, - Total! ----677--39~87% __ _
;0009219
12 231' Precinct'
Vote by Mai(
1 11.11%
176 42' 28.97%
- 188° 2~1_.. - ------- -_-___ -- _ro_ta_l.[ ____ ·43 ---·21:92i·--. :ooon20
680 65.45%
713 63.83%
43 978
1,021
103
111

44.79%

61.05%

60.13%

88.89%,

71.03%
----~-84~0 Pre<:inct· 73 54.89% 60 45.11%.
_2~~~~--------~~iS4·o·: ------------ voie by M~il: 72? -~!~ ----·-· -l,i64 63.61%:
2,387 2,840; Total
1 796 37.55¾ 1,324 62.45%"
------------~-- --··----·-··--··
8,049 : ____ 9_,6_10~
1 ~o~~~-~~-~-a,_Di_"_"ct-•T_o_,,_il ___ z,_01_1_3_9_3_9½_ 4,335 1 60.61% l Cumulative
'.Cumulative
-------------- -----~--:-------------

0. ____ ~ Precinct) ____ o_. ____________ _
o· _______ -VotebyMaill
o, Total,
2,817 39.39%
45 891 Precinct 22 57.89%
720
765
91 107,
1,159
1,266
122
1,784
1,906
-----~_9~·---· ----·~-- _Vote _by_M!i~i--"~- 317 49.45% 891 Total- 339 49.93¾_
-···-···--------------- -
0009203
1,773 Precinct 42 53.85%
Vote by Mai! s16 · 39.51%
Total --- ·ss·a· 40.32%
0009208
1,660 Pre<:inct 45 57.69¾ ----------
1,660 Vote by Mail: 359 34.55¾
. -·-----~- - ----· 404 - -36.173/~ 1,660
2,215·
2,215
0009210
0009219
Total"
Preci~(i'
Vote by Mai!
Total'
53 624
€77
5521%

38.95¼

39.87½
------------------
4,335
16 324
340
60,61¼

42.11%

50.55%

50.07¾

36. 46.15%
790 60.49¾
826 59.68¾
33 42.31%
680 65.45%
713 63.83%
43 978
1,021·

44.79%

61.05%

60.13%
12 231 Precinct 1 11.11% 8, 88.89% ------~ --------------------------- 176 231' _____ v_o_te_b:__y_M_ai~li. 42 28.97% 103 71.03% Total 188 231'. Total, 43 27.92¼ 111 72.03%
0009220 . ;00-09220 -- I
Precinct 1571
2,8-40' Precinct1 • 73~··-54.89¾ ___ _
--·--·--·----- -----
--~~-te by ~'.a!I_ 2,230'
Total 2.387
··--·- ___ 2.840~ _____ v_ot_e_:by+--M_a-,il+--[ ___ 723 36.39¾

2.840 Total! 796 37.55%
---- ----------·- 2,817 39~393/.,,, 25th Assembly Dislrict - Total Cumulative
Cumulative
Vote by Mail
Total
Cumulative - Total
Mcm-lbN ofthe-Stite-Ass"emOly·.
_"(o_tal_ +­
Board of Equali:zation {State}
Statl?.B0al'd-Of Eqll3fiz3iio·n-
#2
0009201
8,049 9,610, 25th Assembly District• Total!
Vote by Mail'
0 Total:
--- -" ----------0 Cumulative - Total'
8,049 9,610 ~~~~~-er of th~ _s_t~~~~~~!!:f
Board of Equalization (State) !
, State Board ofEqttaifzatfOll
•z~---
0009201
2,817 3939%
60" 45.11%
1,264 63.61%
1,324:- 62.45%
4,335 60.61%
o:
o·
4,335· 60.61¼
Precinct
__ Vote b_Y ~~i)
Total
45 720
765
891i Precinct 22 57.89%, 16' 42.11%
0009203
0009208
0009210
0009219
0009220
·------------------
____ 89_1 VotebyMallj 317 49.45% 324. 50.55%
891. _________ To_t_,lc_' _ 33~ ---~-!~~.--------~~ -~~~~- Precinct
~~-~e ~Y ~-~i!
Total
Precinct
Vo_~~ bt~~~ -·-
1,446: 1,773
107
1,159'
10009203 ---~-- -·--------·--· Prednct: 42 53.85¾
Vote by Mail'. 516 39.51%

34.55%,
-- _ _!~!~------___ 1,266 ------- __ 1,'--66_0+:f ==---- j0009210
Total' 404 36.17%
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
122 2,2151 Precinct' 53 55.21%
1 1,784, ____ Z.e,21_5_',_ ____ Vote by Mail;
1,906' 2.2151 -----,.~taii ________ _,_ ______________ _ ;0009219
677 39.87%
36, 46.15%
790' 60.49%
33 42.31%
680' 65.45%
713 63.83%
43 - 44.79%

61.05%
1,021 60.13%
Prednct 12
-----··--·---------
1 11.11% 8' 88.89%
Vote by M~i! 176
Total 188 231' Total 43 27.92.¾
,0009220 .
157, 2,840 Precinct 73 54.89¾
. ·-·"---·--·------Precinct
Vote by 1'.~~il. -·~-~~'--~-~~~---- ------•--•-- ___ Vo~ebyMai( -~---~~-~- 36.39¼' Total 2,387 ~840 ____ Total. 796 37.55%
Total 8,049 9,610 _ State Board Of Equalization #2 {
.Tnt;:,l

2.817 39.39%
103
111

71.03%
60 45.11%
1,264 63.61%
··1,324' "6-2i5%.
4,335 6061¼
Cumulative
Cumulative
Cumulative
Cumulative

0.00½

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00¾

0.00%

0.00¼

0.00¼

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
0,00¼

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00¼

0.00¼

0.00¼

0.00¼

0.00%

0.00¼

0.00¼

0.00%,

0.00%

0.00¼

0.00%
0,00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.0-0%

0.00%

0.00¼

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%'
0,00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
000%
1,039
1,117
96 1,602
1,698
145
154
133
1,937
2,120
7,152
o:
7,152
38 641
679
78 1,306
1,384
78 1,039
1,117
96 1,602
1,698
145
154
133
1,937,
2,120
7,152
7,152
38 641,
679
78 1,306
1,384
78 1,039
1,117
96 1,602
1,698
145
154
133
1,987

2.120
7,152
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 75 0(120
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total
Cumulative. Total
e'o.ird of Equa.lizs)tiOn (State).

Total
City
City of Santa Clara
0009201
0009203
0009208
0009210
0009219
0009220
Precinct
Vote b~ Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by ~~i~
Total
Precinct
Vote by ~~ii_
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mal!
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
City of Santa Clara - Total
Cumulative
Cu mu la live
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Cumulative• Total
~~~: Total
Unincorporated Area
Unincorporated
0009201
0009203
0009208
0009210
OJ09219
0009220
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total
Precinct
Vote ~y Mail
Total
Pre-dnct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote b~Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct'
Vo~e b_y ~1ail
Total
U~incorp~~~-ted - !?_t~l -
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
_ Vote by ~!ail
Total
Cumulative - Total
Unincorporated Area - Totoit
8,049
45 720
765
91'
1,446
1,537
107
1,159
1,266
122:

1.784
1 1,906
12 176
188
157
2,230
Z387
8,049
0 0
8,049
45 720
76S.
91 1.446
1,537
107

1.159

1.266
122
1,784
1,906
12 176
188
157
2,230
2,387
8,049
0 o_
9,610
Prednct,
vOte·by-Ma\-
Total' -- - - _,_
Cumulative· Total
- --- - • - _____ I
Board of Equalization (State) -11
.• Tnt;,I'.

City i
Citr of _Santa Clar~
0009201 --·1 - ! _________________ _
891i Precinct; 22\ S7.89¾; 16/ 42.11%) --·-----~: ____ ~:~~~: ____ _ Vote bYMail1 3171 ·- 49.45%i 324\ S0.5S¾i o; 0.00%] 891 891
1,773
1,773,
1,773
1,660
1,660i
1,660'
- !~~~~----339, __ 49.93%: __________ 34~: s0.07%! _ ·------ o; __ o.o~i __ 0009203 i i ! ,
Predncti 42; 53.85%i - 36i 46:1s%! oi 0.00%
--·---- Vo-te by Maili ___ 516: 39.51%: 7901 60.49%\ ·or-Q.--QO%-- 0009208
T~tai; ssa: 40.3:_%: _ __ -~~-- 59.68%f o: QOO%:
-------~:---·- i -~----'- -----
----~~-~~~~t~ ---- -~ _57.69%: 331 42.31%! o: 0.00%
V~~~~_Y_!~~--- 3591 34 55%1 680j 65.4S¾j 0! O.W,-(
Tota1
1 404'. 36.17%i 713\ 63.83%\ o! 0.00%;
,0009210
2,215:
____ ._ _L _____ J __ i - I _______ --
Precinct, 53'. 5521%1 43 1 44.79%! 01 0.00%
vot~-~~~--- ------~~~ - 38.95%'. 91ai 61.0s%_; o· 0.00%; 2,215' Total 677 39.87%! 1,021! 60.13%'. o; 0.00%
'0009219
- - ___ I __________ _
231
231
231'
2,840
2,840
2840
9,610
0,
0 9,610,
0009220
Precinct
Voteb-;Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
81 88.89%' o· 0.00%
·--------
42 28.97%'. 1031 11.03%\ o; 0.00%:-
-43·- 27.92%'. 111; 72.08%' - --~L__0.00%_
73 54.89%:
723! -36.is¾: --·
____ c__ _________ i --· ----. -
796
2,817'

37.55%

39.39¾;
1,324' 62.45%1

60.61%:
-·----- ----------
0 0.00%'
---- --·-------- -
0 0.00%,
Cumulative
Cumulative : ; i
Pre-,in«--------. - ~----------------_--__ ii_' ________ ] 0 Vote by Mail
Total
-C~mUl~tive • Total ---
City ·Total:
o, --------a:---

2.a11; 39.39%' 4,335! 60,61'W
1-·- .-··---
7,152
641\
679
78 1,306'

1.384
96 1,602'.
··- ·1:is8
133'
1,987·
a 120.
7,152·
7,152
----· -------------- ---
1,773
1,773
1,773
1,660
1,650
1,660
00-09208
Precinct"
Vote by Mail
Total,
42, 53.85%: 36[ -1s.1s%: o· 0.00%
790 60.49%· 0 1 0.0-0%
+ 826 59.68%: 0.00%
5161 3_9.~1'¼ ___
5S8 40.32¾'
------ .. -; . - ···- ·-·-
, ··----1· --------·-·--~------------! l ·-------------•-----.:-.

Precinct; 45 57.69¾ --~:_ --~~:_3_~~'. __ . _ o; 0.00%, Vote by Maih 359 34.55% 0.00%'
Total'. 404 36.17% 713: 63.83%\
78 1,306
1,384
ii
1,039.

1.1,1:
0009210
2,21S Precinct
-Vote by ·Mail;
Total
53 -·-------,--·----- . ----------5521% 43'. 44.79%
--·-----' - -----· ---
0 0.00% 96
1,602
1,698
2,215
2,215
231
231
231,

2.840,
ZB40
Z84o:
9,610'
0009219
0009220 -
Precinct
. - - Vote--b;/M~iii -
Total;
624 38.95%:
677, 39.87%
___ ··-- ~!; __ 61.0S%i _______ ----~~-_.?~~~--
0 0.00%,
11 11.11%; a: ___ a_~:~ o 0.00%:
43' 27.92%·
42 2~~~~~-------- 103: __ ~~~~~-- --------~' ·- 0.00%·
111; 7208%/ 0~00%1 -
·'------
i
··-·-?;~i-~t---- ·-1i.--·54:a9%.---··-- 60j ·45.11~i:-----·--0~%·-· - Vote by MaiF . 723·--36.39%' 1,264/ 63.61%,1 - 0 0.00"/2,:
····--·rot;i:·-------:;95-··3755¾·--·-- ---,ji~i- 62.4s%· · -~o·----0.00%' ---- ---- ---- ---
Unincorporated • Total Z817 3939%1 4,335 j 60.61%: 0 0.00%, --------------. -~-- ----~-----'-1--~----·-----~--1·--·- 145,
15'
133
1,987
2,120
7,152
Cumulative !I
;cu;n~l~i~e·--· 1-· +----------~-----·-··----
Prec:inct
1 Vote by Mail'
! 0i ._! ____ -0.c_. -
·--~l ___ . 11 o; _______ , __ _
Cum~~•--~:~:~ -----+---------i------'----~-'-!--\ _____ ~--~ ~~ Unincorporated Area • Total:, 2,817 39.39%i - ·-4,335: 60.61%: 01 0.00% --.,; 1 si/ i ---- ------
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 76 of 120 12/2/2020 7:28:39 PH
City of Santa Clara, Member, City Ccmncil, Di1>!!·i~! 6 (Vote for _1) District
Countywide
Electionwide
Precinct
Vote by Mail .

Efect:onwide • Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative• Total
Countywide • Total
Congressional District
17th Congressional District
Prednct
Vote by Mail
17th CongreSsioflafDistrid·­
. Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative - Total
Congressional o;.strict • Total
State Senator
10th Sen;1totial District
Precinct
_ ~~~e b~ ~a:i
10th Senatorial District - Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative - Total
State Sen<1.tor - Tota!
Member Of the St.ife"
~.s.sem_b!v
25th Assembly District
Precinct
_v_ot~-b_Y._~e~t _
25th Assembly District - Total
Cumulative
Prednct
Vote by Mail
Cumula\ive - Tota!
Member of the state AsSE.iinb!Y.
..... ___ IotaJ
Board of Equalization (State)
State Board Of Equalization
.,
Precinct
Vote bf Mail
· sra-te Board Of Equ·aliz.itiori-#2 -
ToJal
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative • Total
soard Of Eq,ialfaaiion {S.taie) -
Total
City
City of Santa Clara
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cio/_~~ ?anta Claru. T~~~l.

Cumulative
Precinct
Vo~e by Ma)I
Cumulative - Tota!
City· Total
597
9,553:
10,1~0

10.150
597
9,553
10,150
10,150
597.
9,553
10,150
10,150
597
9,553'
10,1so·
i,
10,150
597
9,553
10,150
10,150
597
9,553
10,150,
10,150
11,747

11.747
11,747
11,747~
Count¥:"ide
Electlonwlde
Precinct
Vote by Mail i
Er~ctlon~;ide· • Toi;1 L.

Cumulative
Congress.Iona! District
----------------
180 36.81% 129: 26.38%' mo: 36.81%:
---·,:799, 22.21% 3,323: --~?!.-%~ .• ---2,-97-7,
1,979 3,452; 40.20¾ 3,157.'
I : 1 I
17th Cong,essional Oist<ict i ·-· ·····-·1 .. ,······-··· .. -· - - - Precinct: -- --,80~36.81%,
- l l - .! ____________ ,_
11,747
11,747_
11,747;
Vote by ~1~i-lr­
" 17th Ca~9~e·s;f~n~-OirtriCt:i--
--- -1,]99;',_~21%,'
129! 26.38%! _ --·- 1!0i 36.81%; 0, 0.00%:
3,323· - -4io3'¼I 2,911; 36.76%_· __ ----~-'---~-0-00¾; - 1,979 23.04% 3.452! -40.20%: 3,157: 36.76%: 0 0,00%
- --~ :rnt;,I'..

Cumulative I
Prednct,
Vote by Mail
CumU1;·ti;;e ~ T~tai:--
·--·-- o' .... _ -···-·- .. o --···-- , ····-··· -
11,747 · Congress.iondl Dis-triCt -To.tai":
o:
0 1,979:
11,747.
11,747
State Senator
10th Senatorial District
Precinct 180 36.81% 129 26.38%" 180 "i6:8n{,/
Vote by Mail: ·----~ii!~-I~~==--~j~(· 41.03%: ---- ·2,977---i~76% -·· 11,747 --,oth-se·~at~rial Di~tric"t-~-r~;I -- 1,979, 23.04% 3,452-'--◄-0,-209<-~C---.-3,-15-7-. -3-6-,7-6% 11,7-17
11,747'
11,747:

Cumulative
Precinct'
Vote by Mai![
Cumulati~e -Total,
Stat~ S~nator -T~taiJ,
Member Of the- State
_ Assembly _______ __I_
25_1~ Assemb_ly District ___
1 ,
Precinct! 180 36.81% 1a0j- -3i81o/,/ 1291 26.38%!
VOt;-biMail;· i:199' 22.-21%'. 3,323r -"-,-_03%'. 2,971! 36.76%; ·- . ··- ···-- ···--·----·----C...--'----..:_..:_ __ .c__ 11,747 ; 25th Ass.ernbly Distric.t-Totali 1,979
1 23.04%: 3,4521 -40.20%) 3,157i 36.76%'
Cu~~lative ] i ! ! -- -- /,_· _·_-_-_·_-_-.,,i-_-_-_-_·~ O' - -- ---- Precinct[ o:' ) Oi Oi
-~;·--------~~~- ~~e--~-~-ai~ -~~-~--- Oi __ o~; _____________ ?~~---- 01 Cumulative-Total: 01 o; o;
11,747 :' Member of the State Assembly j 1,979; 23.04¾; --3,4_5_21'--4-0-.20%--':---3,-15-7~j-36.76%i ____ ---- -- --'· · ·----- .• Tnt;i.!'-. ----·1 ---- I ------1---,----~-·, ~-- Board of Equalization (State) ! i !
I : I '
I I i I
0,
0,
0 0
o,
o.
0/
000%
·o.00%'-

0.00%

0.00%'

0.00¾.

0.00¾i
I

0.00%'
State BOard Of Eqi.ializatiOl'l
___ ,_2 __
11,m; ----·-------~~=-c~~~----·~-~: _ 36.81%:

22.21%: 11,747 Vote by Mall --~.'.,~991
11,747 : Siat·e· e-;;-~;-d o"iiq~;ri;;1J~~ #2.;-- 1,919: 23.04%! --- 129t 2G.3s%'. rnoi 36.81%· · ______ O: _o_:_~: __
3,3231 41.03%; 2,977) 36.76%:·--- o· 0.00%;

3.4s2t 40.20%! 3,1s1: 36.76%' o: i00¾1 __ _
···~--!--___ !__~- --- ! ·------ -- -----··---, ---
11,747
11,747-
11,747:
11,747
.Tnt;,1
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Cumulative• Total
Cil)'.

City of Santa Clara
Precinct.

Vote by Mail.

City of Santa Clara - Tota(
Cumulative
Precincti
Vote by Mail!
o: ·"----~oi -:---o~---­-- ··-o: ------------------- -·0·1- 0· o:
1,979 23.04% 3,452! 40.20%
mo 36.81% · 1·2s'. 26.38%; rno. ·36.81%
1,799 :-~~~·------ 3,3231 41.03%: --- -~·!?~.--!~_6_~~­ -- .. 1.979_: __ 23.04% 3,452 40.2Whi 3,157' 36.76%
- - ' - ' i ' _l ____ _
o!
489
8,099
asa8
8,588
489
8,099_
·s,ssa'
8,58B
489
8,Q99,
8,588
489,
8,099'
8,588
0 o,
a,5as.
489
8,099
8,588
o.
8,588
---- --- ------- - ---- --
P-age: 76 or 120 12/2/2020 1:58:36 p:,.1
Precinct
0009251
0009252
0-009258
0009252
0009264
0009268
0009275
0009282
Countywide
Electlonwide
Precinct
Vote bf Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote ~y M~i.l
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Prednct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Elec.tionwida • Total
Cumulati\le
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by_~'.1~il
Total
Cumulative• Total
County,·,ide • Total
Congressional District
17th Congressional District
0009251
(}J092S2
0-0092S8
0009262
0-009264
0-009268
0009275
0009282
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vo~': by M_~i(. _
Total
Precinct
v~!~ ~Y Mai!'
Tota!
Precinct
Vote-~~ ~A!i!
Total·
Pre-cin<t
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mall
Total
17th Congressional District•
Total.

Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
67 1,151.
1,218'
110
1,727
1,837
130

1.464
1,614
11 214
225
10' -
1,712
1,782
78,
1,718,
1,796
128
1,542
1,670
10,150
10,150
67 1,151
1,218
110
1,727
1,837
130,
1,484:
1,614!

11. 214
225
10'
1,712
1,782.
78 1,718
1,796
126
1,542
1,670
10,150
]ooo92s1
1,343:
1,343
1,343
County.,.,ide _
Electlonwlde
Vote by Mail: -- ---------·---- -----.!-
Total:
-- ---~---------------
!
20 3s.1_1_%~' ___ 2_0! ·-3si1_%_l -----~~\ _ 2s.s1%!
-• _ 164i_ _ 16:3_21.:_. 4871 48.46%i 3S4; 35.22%
184' 1734%: 507j: 47.75%! 370: 34.Srn,,----
0009252- ___ ! ____ l ___ l \-------------. --
2,146
2,1-46

2.146,
1,901,
1,901·
,:9011
267,
267,
0009258
0009262
267, .• -----
,0-009264
1,999:
1,999,
1,999
0009268
2,037:
2,0.37;
2,037,
p;e~i~~i! 36· 39.56%: 21 I 23.08%1 -~:-37.36%;- --
V.ole bYM3J( -·31f/-21.17%: - -- 674f-·45:,4o/,,i 503; ___ 33"% ·rota1~-.. -------~~~~-E:.:~. __ -~!43ffl·~; --~m __ !_3~!~_:_ Precinct:

Total
Precinct
· · V~te ·by Mai-I
Total
, I • .
- -------------·.
34i 31.19% 45' 41.28%
264
294, 2134%'
547 43.10%
sn: 42.96%
- -----·--------------·---- --- ------------- -
4 50.00% 1 • 12.50%' 3 37.50%
---- '·----------------
35: 2~~-1-~~---------- 601 ___ 34_.4_6C'%C'· ____ 791 45.40%; -39·- 21.43%' 61! 33.S2½' 62,--45.05%'.
: --;-------;---· ---
• , I __ ;,. ___ - --··'---·'- .. ---·
Precinct 25/ 4?.4?%~-- 9' 16.36%:______ 21; 38.18¾
VotabyMait' 386; 27.87%: 547! 39.49%'. 4-5z; 32.64%,
!
~o~~--- - - 411: - 28.54%: ----- 55611 38.61%) 473; 32.85% -Pr~~-i~==~~----iSAB¾i ______ 1sl_ ~~%[_ ____ -u:·· 3S:-18if=------- Vote by Mail' 354'. 24.76%, 557! 38.95%1 519: 36.29%
··--·-·rot;i;·--------376-25_20¾. 575: 38.54%! ·s41: 36.26%. -----.. : -------: ----: -------
0: 0.00%
o; o.oo¾,
.. iiD-0%(
--ii6oi<

0.0Q°,(

0.00%:
o: 0.00¾
o,

0. 0.00%

0.00%_
000¾

0.00'/2;

0.00%:
0, - ~-~O¾r-·
o, 0.00%:
0 0.00%'
10009275
2,049·
,:049
-P~ecinct. 41: 38.68¾
Vote by Mai11 ---· ~80_; _ 20.93%: ____ _
26: 24.53%: _____ ----~: __ :~-79% ---------- o, ---~9~'. 5381: 40.21%:! s20; -~:..~~~----- _ o: 0.00%:
2,049
,0009282
Total' 321 22.23% 564: 39.06%: 559; 38.71%: 0 0.0(1'/4' s,
5:

11.747
---- ---· -----~- . --- --- ----------Precinct 2 100.00¾ 0 0.00%; ; , I i
Vote by Mail ·o: --o.00¾· 21 40.00%!-
T~·t;~J~~---.------z---- 28:S-1%:--~---- 2: 28.S7%. - 3 42.86%' Electionwide -T~tal: 1,979 23.04%; 3.452i' 40.20%: - 3,157 36.76% Cumulative
Cu mutative
Precinct:
·--------·--·-·-
VotebyMaH 0
Total: 0
Cu~~!ative • Total'
0 - 0 --· - ---·- .
11,747' Countyw!de ~ Total' 1,979 23.04%: 3,452i 40.20%j 3,157 36.76%'. 1,343
1,343
1,343
.~.°~~r~~~~onal Dist~~~--_
---· ------ ----------1--·
----,1--~-'-----
;0-009251
·----: ·--· ---::-------
: I :

Precinct; ---20-35.713/:: _____ -- ---20f¼i1%; ·- 16 28:57%, Vote by Mail: 164 1632%: ____ <_87+.l 48.46%; ----~~--~:-=-~~ 1 -
o.o<)%
O, OJ)0%
o,
0,

0.00%;

0.00%,

0.00%;

0.00%

0.00%:

S6.
1,COS
iC61
91 1,493,
1,584
109
1,269
1,376
174
162
ss
1,385_
1,440"'
62 1,430

1.492
106
1,338
1,444
8,588
8,588
S6
1,005
1,061
/0~~S~ ·---~:•~ti·~-~==; __ ·,_7.3_4_%: ____ 50--1+)_•1_.1_9_%~' ------3-70 ---~~~=~.! -·-- _ 2,146 Pre<inct' 36 39.56%; 21\ 23.08%: 34 37.36%1 o· 0.00% 91 2,146'. Vote-by-,-~~-H-i---3-16~-2-,.-11-%~,---6-7-4:-4-S-.14-%: --·· S03_ 33.69%1 __ ------o; -0]>o%! _________ 1A9_3_

2.146) Tota!/ _____ 3_~: __ 222_2~L------~~~1II __ 43.88~; _______ 537,1 33.90%j -~:___ -0.00%; ________ ~,:~ 1 0009255 r-- --~i __ ! i
1,~2J. __ Pre<:.inct\ 30 27.S2%j 3-41 31.19% 4S! 41.28%\ 0: 0.0-0%! 109' ~:~~:,__ _______ Voteby_M_ai~I/ ___ 264 20.80%1 4S81 36.09%; 547 1 i 43.10%_: 0 0.00%r---·-t,i69
1,901: Total! 294. 21.34%: 492j 35.70%i __ :92i _ 42.96%; 0, ·0.00%: 1,378 ;0009262 -- - - - i : · ! , L _ =:r _
. ___ 267:'________ Precinct! 4, 50,00¾/ ,I 12.50%:1 3,: 37.50%: ·o: 0.0on/2, 267j - Vote by Mail\ ---35-:· 20.11%! ----·· 60' 34AS%f___ 79[ 4S.40%i ~---- --- o; - 0.00%: ------ - 174 267; Total\ 3?
1 21.43%j 61! 33.52%:

I 0009-264- ·~~~:-~-~-: r: _______ _ 1
1999 Precincti 2s: 45.45%:
1,999 Vote by Mail: 386 27.87%
9' 16.30%: 21: 3s.,a% -o~OO%''
547 39.49¾i 452' 32.64% o: 0.00%;
1,999
2,037
2,037
2,037

2.049
2,049,
2,049
0009268
0009275
10009282
· Total:1 ----41,-,--28.54% ___ ,_ 556 38.61%/ 473, 32.85% ---- ----- 1-•-· --------~-----·- ----~--- i __________ :_~--~--" Precinct· 22 35.48% 18 29.03%! 22' 35.48%
VotabyMail' -354' 24.76%, S57: 38.9S%! 519' 36.29%
Precinc.ti
Vote by Mail:

Tot~I!
Precinct!
376, 2s.20% 575, 38.s~:~_: ______ ,:~·-_:~~26~-
41, 38.66% 39' 36.79%,
------~-----
280 20.93% 53a: 40.21<!.J_~_• ___ 5_20
- ·321, ___ 22.23%_
1 ________ ·564'. 39.06%j 559 -~~-?~~~~-
·--------'----·--- ----·;--'"- ----· - -
2' 100.00%; ----'----000%·---~o: ---0.00%; --·

38.86%'
________ _! ____ i __ i___ l ___ _ ____ 1 _______________ _ VOte· bY Mafi: 0.00%; 2! 40.00%: 3; 60.00%
-·10·1~1( -z: -·2s.s1%j_____ 2' 28.57¾\ ·--------~'--~i~I--· 11,747 17th Cong,essi~~.1 oiS~:::r . ____ ,,979:--2io4%i-- ·-3,452!4°20%i --3~~71 .... 3~~~;. ;·cu~~l3tT~~~~lative -------1- ' ____ : _______ i __ l =~~~-: ___ -,_,:_~~-~ -({ Precinct: ! ----~~----1 ______ Ol
o,
0,

0.00%'

0.00%

0.00%'-
0 .. - 0.00%
- -ti'.. 0.00%
o.00%'--

0.00%
o: 0.00%,
0 0.00'\
0,00%'
182
S5
1,385
1,440
62 1,430,
1,492
106
1,338
1,444
5,
i
8,588
Page: 76 of 120
Congressional o;strict - Total
State Senator
0009252
0009258
0009262
0009264
0009268
000927S
Precinct
_ y_::~e by Mai!
Total
Precinct
~~:e by!'Aail _
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vo!_eb-1Mail
Total
Precinct
___ ':'_~~-1?','Mail
Total
Precinct
10,150
67 1,151
1,218
110
11,747 Congressional District -Total.

State Senator
10th Senatorial District
0009251
1,343 Precinct
1,343 --v~t;byM~a ------- ---·------·-
1,343 Total
.'0009252
Precinct'
1,727 2,146'

1.Sl7 2,146
1,901
Total:
--------------------' .. --
·0009258
Precinct
Vote by Mail,
130
1,484
1,614 1,901; Total;
--·----~-- --·-·ooon62
11 214 267
Precinct
-v~te by M~iC -
1,979 23.o4%
20 164
184

16.32%

17.34%
36' 39.56%
316 21.17%
3S2 22.22%
30 27.52%
264 20.80%
294 21.34%
4 50.00%
35 20.11%
-Ei;=~:=--·_2~1·, - ~ -·-=~=·=:-~~~~~~=--=-·--_-_--~---~~~~~~ __ _ 70 1,712.
!00-09264
1,782 1,999:
78 ----
/0009268
2,037,
2,049'
Precinct:

Vote by Mall:
25, 45.45%
386· 27.87%
Total, 411 28.54¾
Precinct' 22. 35.48%
Vote by Mail' 354 24.76%
Tota Ii 376 2520%'
41, 38.68½
_ Vot~ by Mail' ______ _!_,_~-2-. _-_-.. ---.. --2,049; Precinct'
Vote by Ma\\'
Total
280 109l% ·-..
;21 22.23½ Total 1,670 2,049
0009282
Precinct
Vote by Mail _, .

Total
10th Senatorial District - Tota!
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vo_t:_~y-~~ail
Total
Cumulative - Total
State Senator~ Total
Member of the Stat""e
Assembly
25th Assembly District
0009251
0009252
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total
VotebiM;il,
Total'
--- -------·
2 100.00%

0.00¼
2 2857%
10,150 11,747, 10th Senatorial District - Total; 1,979 2304% 0 0
0 10,150
67 1,151
0 o.
0 11,747
Precinct
Vote by Mail' 0
Total 0
Cu~UlatNe - Total
State Senator - Total
Member oftheState
Assem~!Y .•
2Sth Assembly District
0009251 ... . ..
0 - - --1,97-9 - 23.04%
1,343 Precinct 20 35.71%
1,343 Vote by Mail 1€4 16.32%
1,21s . i343··------------· TOr-;;i···· 184 17.34%
·00092s2
Precinct 110 Z146 Pr;ci~t·,-· -i6--39.56o/~~--
0009258
0009262
0<:09264
0009268
0009275
0009282
---------·-·---·----- ----
Vo~e by Mail ___ , 1,727 2,146
2,146
Vote by Mail'. 316 21.17%
Total
Precinct
~ote b~ !:~~~-­
Total
130
1,484
1,614

1.901
1,901
1,901
Total 1 352 2222%
0009258
- :-
Precinct' 30' 27.52%
,---·------------------------------·
Vote by Mail! 264 20.80%
Tota!\ 2.94 21.34%
!0009262 !
Precinct 11
__ -~~'.e by r~n. 214
Total 225 267
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Tota!
Precinct
Vote ~Y Mail
Totul
Precinct
Vote ?Y ~~il
Total
0009264
70 1,999 ·· -- --··---p-~cinct' ---- 25.- 45.45%
__ 2~1~·------_ _.!,_9~~~--- ____ Vote ~y Ma!!\ 386 27.87% - 1,782 1,999 Total' 411 28.54%
----~---•---- ;0009268 '
78 1,718
1,796
ZOJ7.
2,037
:000927S
128" ---~<:19!, ___ _
1,542 2,049
• - - -------------· +
1,670 Z049
22 35.48%
Vote by Maiti 354 24.76%·
Total, - ·376 25.20%
Precinct·
Vote by Mail;
41 iao

38.68%

20.93%

22.2i%.
2 100.00%

3.452 40.20%
20 487
507.

35.71%,

48.46%

47.79%
21 23.08%.
674; 45.14%
695 •i:88¼
34 4S8
492'

31.19%

36.09%

35.70%,

12.50%
Go: 3XA8% ..

61. ·3i:51%
9, 16.36%
547i 39.49%'
S56 38.61%
,a: 29.03%
557 38.95%
S75 38.54%
26 2~i53% "" -
S39 4021¼
S64 .39.06%

0.00%
40,00%
2 28.57%

3.452 4020%
3,452 402if,f,
20 35.71%
""487 --48~-t6% -
507 47.79%
21 23.08%
674 45.14%
695 43.88%
34 31.19%"
458 36.09%
492, 35.70%
1 ·12:so¾ ·
60 34.48%
61 ll.S2%
9 16.36%.
547 39.49%
556 38.61%"
18 29.03¾
S57
57S

38.95%
38,$,\%
26 24.53%
S38 40.21% ..

S64; 39.06%

0.00% Precinct
Vat: ?Y Mail
Total
25th Assembly District - Tote!
------~--~•-~---------~-- _,.

Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
5 Vote by Mail: 0.00% 2 40.00%
- ---··----5._·-~-~·.,..·-.,..... .. _· -cc-.. .,--·~~~~:-==----·-2· 28.57% 2: ia.51% 10,150 11,747; 25th Assembly District-Total 1 1,979 ·2°i04%---~ 3:◄ 52: . "40.20% __ i_,_ --:--
3,157 36.76%
16 314
370

28.57%

35.22.%

34.87%
34 37.36%
503 33.69%
S37 33.90%
4S
547
592

41.28%

43.10%
42,96%

37.50%
79 45.40%
82 45.05%
21 4S2
473

38.18¼

32.64%

32.85¾
22 3.S,4B%
519 36.29%
541 36.26%
39 S20
S59

36.79%

38.85%_

38.71%

0.00¾

60.00%
3 42.85%
3,157 36.76%
3,157 35.70%
16 28.57%
354 35.22%
370 34.87¾
34 S03
537

37.36%

33.69%

33.90%
45 41.28%
547 43.10%
592 42.96%
3 37.50¾
79 45.40%
82 45.05%
21 38,18'½
452 32.64%
473 32.85%
22 3548%
519 3629%
S41' 3626¼
39 36.79%
520 38.86%
559 38.71%
O.O<P/4

60.00%
3 42.86%
3,157 36.76%
12/2/2020 1:58:36 p,.,
o,

0.00%

0.00%

0.00¼

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00¾

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00¾

0.00%

0.00%
o.00%·

0.00%
o, 0.00%

0.00%

0.00""/4

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
000%

0.00%

0.00%
o.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00¼

0.00%
o.ooo/~

0.00%

0.00%

0.00¼

0.00%.

0.00%
0,003/,

0.00%

0.00%
o.00¾

0.00%

0.00%
000%

0.00¼
000%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

8.588
56 ,.oos
1,061
91 1,493
1,584
109
1,269
1,378
174
182
55 1.385

1.440
62 1,430
1,492
106
1,338

1.444
1 8,588
8,588
56 1,0{15
1,061
91 1,493
1,584
109
1,269
1,378
174
182
ss
1,3S5
1,440
62 1,430
1,492
105
1,338
1,444
7 8,588
Page: 76 of 120
Total
Cumulative• Total
Member of the Sii3tl?Asstinib!Y-­
Total
Board of Equalization (State)
Staie B-oard Of Equalizaffon
.,
0009251
0009252
0009258
0009?52
0009264
0009268
0009275
0009282
Precinct
__ y~t~-~~ ~-3jj
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!'
Precinct
Y~!e b.Y Mail _
Total
Precinct
Vote ~y M~i~._
Tota!
Precinct
Vote b~-~~it __ _
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
State Board Of Equalization-it2
Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
_ ~O!~ ~-~\ail
Total
Cumulative• Total
Soard of Equifization ·1state)-­
Total .

City
City of Santa Clara
0009251
0009252
0009258
0009262
0009264
0009265
0009275
0009282
Predn<t
Vo!e~Mail
Total
Predn,t
Vote ~yMail
Total
Precinct
Y?_t: br__~a~r
Total
Precinct
~~!~ b_y_~~!I
Total
Precinct
Vote ~y.Mall
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail _
Tota\
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precin<:t
Vote by Mail
Total
Ci~ of ?~~ta Clara __ -To_tal
Cumulative
Cumulalivc
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
10,150
67,
1,151
1,218
110
1,727
1,837
130
1,484
1,614
11 214
225
70 1,712
1,782:
78 1,718
1,796
128
1,542
1,670
10,150
10,150
67 1,151
1,218
110
1,727
1,837
130

1.484_
1,614
11'
214
225
70 1.712

1.78i
78,
1,718
1,796.
128
1,S42
1,670
10,150
-T~t~11 -- • o;~ ____ !__ or· ---- f. o: o,
o'
o,
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
o'
-Cumulative-TotalI o: 1i O! 1, ____ o~i __
···· -~~e;,,~~~~~~~~~~te-Asse~~~rL 1,979, 23.04%: 3,452T 40.20%! Board of Equalization (State) ! __ j
3,157;
!

36.76% 1 8,588
o: 0.00% 56
o __ _ooo,i _______ 1,005,
,~,,,::,:· .. ·:•·"] : ~hj J ,.,,J ==: "'~ ,.,,.-=~
1,3.U: vote by Mai( 164 16.32%'. 487i 48.46%: . 354! 35.22%' 1,343 ·Total! 184i 17.3.mj S071 ___ 41J9o/;;· - 3701 34.87%: - 0 0.00-% 1,061 '0009252- - -- ' -- . II ,I I
2,146, Precinct ·-·--- 36'. 39.56%1 21! 23.08% 34: 37.36%' 2,146: \lotebyMaill -- 316! 21.17% ----674~-- 4S.i4%: -~s~?~,- 33.69!: ___ _ 2,146 Total' 352) 22.22%', 69Si 43.eSo/:/ · --~?: 33.90% 0009258 :··
1,901
1,901
1,901
0009262
267
267
267
Precinct
Vote ~~~-~ii!_
Total'
Precinct
. V~t-e-b:iM~-
rota1·
30, 27,52%
4: 50,00%
35 20,11',i,'
39 21.43%
34: 31.19%:
458! 36.09%;'
492, 35,70%;
-·;--
1'' 12.50%"
45' 4128%
547
592
43,10¾:
42,%'¾
- ----- ---·--·---- --
3 37,50%
---~~~---i~%,=---79 1-45~4W/4:
61! 33.52.% sz: 4S,05%
,0009264- . ·- ··---------·--------------- ----, ---- - -~-~!?-
1,999
1,999, Total 411 28.54%:
- --- - :{)(}09"268"
547i 39.49%
-SS6f 38.61%;
I I
452: 32.64%'
473' 32.85% \
! ' -
, , ,
o,
000%

0.00%.
o.1Xi%-
UCO¾
o -o:ooii
ocO¾ -
o,oo¾'
O· 0.00%

0.00¾
-~'.O}!;_ Precinct'
--vOte b}'.r.iail ·
2_2:_ l54S%!
354: 24.76%
3761 -2520%!
18~-2~03%----~-==--=~:-~-_!:~~?----------o-· - 0.00%
~037:
2:0J"?: -
sst 3B.95%i s19. 3625%, a
Total·
:0009211'
2,049' Precinct:
2,049,
2,049,
0009282
V;-t~ by Mail'
-- TOt~,!
Precinc(
Vote by Mail:

Total'
1 ~ -747· Slate Board Of EQ~alizatiO~ :z:
' _jr,hl:.
0 o,
11,747
Cumulative
Cumulati-,e
Precinct:

Vote by Mail;
TO-t.l!
c·u-Nluia"ti;e ~TOtat­
soard of Equalization (State)~.
srs: 38.54%) 541: 36.-26%'
---:--:--- -- ----- : " -----'
- -- ---------- --- ----- ----~-----.
41: 38.68%· __ .:s_ 24.53%' ___ ~:--~~~=~--__

2.80 20.93%' 538! 40.21%] 520: 38.86%
321; 22..23%: S64i- 39.06%i ssg: 38.71%
- , ·--·----- - ---- -,--------,--. ___ I ______ _
2' 100,00%,
---~: -_o~~~! ______ _
o; o._oo_¾-'----­
--- -2~ 28.57%
i <MO%)
-2° - 28.57% ---
1,979 23.04% 3A52'- 40.20%:
••••• e••-------------'---
0 0
0 - -. 1",'9'19_: _ 23.04% 3,452'. 40,20%.
o, 0,00¾

60.00%;

42.86%
3,157 36,76%

36.76%,
, ,
City of Santa Clara ' '0009251 , - - --
, '
1,3431 Precil1ct[ 20; --iSi1%".. ~20~--jST,%~ 16 28.57%:
1,343; Vote by Mall! 164' 1632%'. 48711 48.46%; 354: 35.22% 1,343'. Total, 184] 17.34%; 5071 47.79%1 370 34.87%
1 - 1000-!i2s·2 I I t-----~-· ·-· '
0,00%,
(' 0,00%

0.00%
0, o.-OrfA/
o,
-o:
o'
-0:00%
o,w/2
0,QQ%
o; · 0.00%·
, iiooii'
Oi

2.146,' · P,-eCil1CtJ:------~36'_--·_-l_9_,S_6%_f--____ --_i1_-,,I __ --_23_,0S_-_"~i -_-_-_-_--34--~~~~~~~~-- · -·-o----0:00%; 2,146 VotebyMall 316 21.17%1 6741 45.14%1 503" 33.69%1 o: 000'/4:
91 1,493
1,584
109
1,269
1,378
174
182
55 1,385
1,440
62 1,<30
1,492
106
1,338
1,444
8,588
8,588
56 - 1,005
1,061
91 1,493
1,584 2. 146, · Total\ 352 --~3!~l 6951 43.88% 537; 33.90% - o;- ·- o:OOo/J·- 1,90;;0009258 , Prednct' ----- - 10: 2752%! , _________ ,~_34F-lt19~; 45 41,28%: o, 0,00%: 109 ~::::: Voteby:;-~,,e::----::- 4-•-:-:-:~-:--',!----:-::-'-)-:::~------::: :::~:: _______ ::- :::i- :::t ~ J0009262 --~i- - I \
26i _____ P_rec_;n_ct~--~- 4, __ so_,00%--4oi ____ 1! 12.50%~ 3 37.50%: o; 0.00% 267, VotebyMail,1 35 20.11%1 601r 34.48% 79 45.40%; O' --0.00%• 2611 --·------TotaV______ 39 21.43%, 6t\ 33.s2%. a2i 4s.os%'-·----------- Oi 0.00%·- [0009264
1,999;
1,999
1,999
aOJ7
2,037
2,037
,0009265
0009275
2,049
2,049
2,049
5 11.747
Precinct 25;· 45.45%;
··- Vote by Mailj 386' 27.87%_
·r;·ta1: 411- 28.54%'
---·- !--
Precinct
Vote by Mail!
Total·
Precirn:11-­
Vote by Mail:
22! 35.48%:
354: ---2476%
376' 25,20%,
-.. _] - i -----------: ·----- ·-~--
9j 1636%: 21 is,18%, -----o; ·0,00%'-
-- -5471 39.49%: 4Si, 32.64%1 O, 0.00%'.

SS6i 38.61%, 473: 32.85%'
~ . - ,-
2"i' 35.48%
519 36.29¾
0,00%
0,00%'

0.00¾

0.00%
0 - 0,00%', -
0' 0.00%

0.00%:

0.00%
0,00%

0.00%
174
182"
55 1,385
1,440
62 1,430
1,492
106
1,llB

1.444.
8,S88
Page: 76 of 120
Cumulative - Tota!
____ City-Total __
Unincorporated Area
Unincorporated
OC09251
0009252
0009258
0009262
00092€4
0009268
C-009275
Precinct
Vote ~y Mail __ _
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
_ ~~te by Ma'.~
Total
Precinct
Vo~e by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
__ V~tebyMail __
Total
Precinct
Vote by M~~
Total.
o· Cumulative-Totat 1 o:
10,,so' 1_1_.7_47 ____ -------~~~---Total, ________ ~,979, 23.04% - 3i5-i - 40.20¼, i ______ -~ninco~~:~:!~--
i :0009251
-----
67 1,343 Precinct! 20. 35.71% 201 3S.71%:
1,151· 1,343 164
184
. ·1632%~-----" ·457· 48.46%

47.79¾/ 1,218
110
1,343,
0009252
---- ------·-- --
2,146:

Total
Precinct!

1.727 2,146 Vote by Mail;
-•---~----~-----
1,637 ----------~~~~-- ___ ·-------~~~a_!'.
130

1.464
1,614
0009258
1,901 Precinct:
1,901 Vote by Mail
1,901, Total'
0009262
------

17.34%
36 39.56%
316: 21.17%
352 22.22%
30 27.52%
264 20.8()½
294 21.34%
11 214·
225
267
267
267
Precinct 4 50.00%
Vote by Mail 35 20.11%
---- ---------
Total' 39 21.43%
'0009264
507
21 · 23.08%
674 45.14%
695 43.88%
34 31.19%
458 36.09%
492 35.70%

12.50%
60 34.48%
61 3352%:
70 1,999 Precinct' 25 45.45% 9 16 36%
1,712----1,-99_9_-----_-_-Vo-_!_- .. b-!.-_M-,-il:~_-__ -__ -_ - 386' ·21.a1% ----- 54] ""39.49%, 1,782 1.999, Total 411' 28.54% 556 38.61%
22 35.48% 18 29.03%·
-- -·-----~---·---- ---
557, 36.95%
sis· 1s.54%
:0009275
Precinct 128 ____ 2.:._04_9 _______ P_re_c_in_ct"""] _____ 3_a~_ --··--------~~~-~4.53% ___ _ ~ote ~!'.-~~ _____ --~•542~--- 2.049: Vote by Mail -~~- __ 20.93~------- 538 40-21% Total 1,670 2.049 Total; 321 22.23%· 564 39.06%
0009282
Precinct
--~ote .~~-~~~~
Total
Unincorporated - Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Cumulative - Total
Unincorporated Area - Total
···-······:coo92a2··· ·· · i ·
3" Precinct:

I
2 100.00%
5· _____ s_· _· _____ v_o_,e_b.:.y_M_a·--'11i ____ o· o.00% 8 Total: 2. 28.57%
o'
10,150
1,979, 23.04%
Cumulative
" - ----·-----~----·-
0 Precinct
VotebyMaW ·---·------~---·--
Total; O
Cumulative• Total' 0
11,747 Unincorporated Area - Totat' 1,979 23.04%
2 40.00%
···2-·2s.57%'
3,452 40.20%
3,452 4020¾
3,157 36,76%
16 2857¾,
354 3522¼
370 34.87%
34 37.36%
·soi 33.69%
537 33.90%
45 4128%
547 43.10%
592 42.96%
3 37.50%
79 45.40¾
82 45.05%
21 38.18%
452 32.64%
473 32.85%
22 35.48%
.. 519. 36.29%
541 3626%
39 36.79%
520 38.86% 0.
559 38.71% o.

0.00%

60.00%

42.86%
3,157 36.76%
3,157 36.76%
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PP.
0 0.00%

0.00%
"'·o.Oo%

0.00%
o.00%

0.003/~

0.00¼

0.00%
·o.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00¾

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00% .. 0.00% ..

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
' 0.00%

0.00%'

8.588
56 ·,.oos
l,061
91 l,493
1,584
109
1269
1,378
174
182
55 1.385
1,440
62 1,430
1,492
106
1,338
1,444
8,588
8,588
Page: '/7 of 120
City of Santa Clara, City Clerk (Vote for1).

District
Countywide
E!ectionwlde
Precinct
Vote by Mail
E!ectionwide - Total
Cumulative
Prednct
yote by Ma!I·
Cumulative - Total
Count>1wide • Total
Congressional District
17th Congressional District
Precinct
Vote by Mail
17th Congressional District.

Totr;1l
Cumulo1tlve
Precinct
Vo!e_ ?'J Mail
Cumulative - Tota!
Congressional District - Total
State Senator
10th Senatorial District
Precinct
Vote by Mail
10th Senatorial District• Total,
Cumulative
Precinct
Vot~-~Mail
Cumulative• Total
State Senator• Total
Member of the State
Asse{Tlblv
25th Assembly ~istrict
Precinct
Vote by Mail
2!:ith Assembly Di.trict - Total
Cumulative
Precinct
. Vo~~ ~tMail
Cumulative - Total
Member of the State Assembly•
Total
Board of Equalization (State)
Statt? Bo3rd Of Equalization
#2
Precinct
Vote by Mail
State Board-of E(lualiiatiOll #2 ·:··~
Tota!.-
Cumulative
Precinct
.. Vote ~Y i_~ail
Cumulative - Total
Board of E(jua!ization {Sfatl!j ~
Total
City
Cit¥ of Sa_n!~ Clara
Precinct
Vote by Mail
City of Santa Clara - Total
Cumulative
Prednct'
~?le_ ~Y _Mail
Cumulative• Total
City-Total
45,834

49.2B6
3,452
45834
49,285
49,286
3,452
45,834
49,285

49.286

3.452
45,834
49,286
49,286

3.452
45,834
49,28f
o·
49,286
3,452
' 45,834·
49,286
0 49,286
~ I 1 !
·--•------------·-·--- ____ :!=._::£_/-----:. ___ i--------~~-r--·-----: _________ :=. 1 Co~-~tY'~-~---
1 , ,'. .', _ ___,• ___ _
Electionwide , ,
________ Preci~ct\ 2,19a; 100.00%: ()i 0.00%: 2,198'.
__ -----~~:~~~~/ ____ 31_,35_01_100_._~.~~;_· ____ o..:.i~~~o . .,.0_0%~"i ___ 3_1,-J5_,o\ E!ectionwide • Total! 33,548! 100.00¼, O! 0.00%: 33,548:
_____ ·--: --------~_umul~~e--------~-----==~~~ ·--.• -.. ~1-_-._-_.--'--··-- 1 O' _______ .. !~e-~~~. o· -·--r~ o; -o;
58,593'
~· . -·c:"u:i::~:~i::::i--~3:54;: 10000%: -·- ;;,: ··o~oo~:.:~~~3·3 •. 54;8·.:

SB.593: i
58,593
58,593
-----------.---- -
~on~r_ess~~nal OisJrkt
17th Congressional District i
Precinct
vo·1·e-by ~,an:
,-7th C~ngress·i~~·al District·~:

Cumulative
Precinct·
Vote by ~11ai( ·
· C~mutatrle -Total;
a 198 100.00%
31,350' · 100.00%:'"
·i3.s;ie 100.00%
o; 0.00%;
o; o.00%· 31,3SO'
'· O' 0.00% - 33,548"
o· -~--------~---.
01 01
58,593 Congressional oi$trict- Totalj 33,548: 100.00%1 OI ···o.00%. ll,548· State Senator
10th Senatorial District
________ ; ______________ .~-· i -----
1 .......... -······ -·
58,593 Prednct' ms 100:001<'. 0, 0.00% 2,198
58,593

58.593
5s.59l·

58.593
58,593

58.593
VotebyMaili 31,350 100.00%! O' --o--:00¾·~-----·31Mo·,
------- --- -------, ~------------ _____ ! __
10U1 Senatorial District - Total: 33,548. 100.00%. o'. 0.00% 33,548 Precinct
Vote by Mai!!
Cumulative - Totai;
Stute Senator : Total i
·r.1em"ber -Ofttie Si3te -- -­
Assembly
25th Assembly District
p~~~i~~t:

I
Vote by Mailj
25th Ass.embly Oi;tnct-To-tali
'
Cumulative
' p,·e-,i~l!
v;te-by M;il~ ·
-- --3i"S4a, -:,-oo~w/4~
I
2,198 100.001',
31,350 100.00%
-- {}1 o'
-- --- 0: - 0.00%' ---33,548'
--------·------- - -

0.00%, 2,198
·· o ··· oo:i% · ·31:iso
- ----------- --------~-
33,548 100.00% o o.o:m! 33.548
o,
58,593 Memb-~r-~f 1he St~~-A~~~~b~ f -
______ .Tt:.\t:>IC.

Board of Equalization (State)
s·tate Boitrd Of EqUalizatiOri
58,593,
- -.. -- __ p.z_. p~;cl~Ct, - o: O,()(Y/4
I
2,198, 100.00""/2: 4198
ss.s~_t_ ____ -··- ____ Vote by-~~~~----·- 31,350' 100.00% oi o.O<r/4!-- 31,3So1; 58,593: StateBoardOfE:~~!'.~.~;:t:L_ --~~~~~~~~% _____ °i_ __ o.00%! _ - ~3,S4a:

Oi •.---+~~~!.~~~--P~ed~ct\ ·01 oi --t----·- ·~01
1 ~·o· Vot~by-Mai!j o! --•-oi I O
O,' -·------~~~~~-~ut~~~--~~tal)_ -Qf +:--- ! ----a:
58,593
1 : Board of Equalization (S~~!.,.:; ----~~~~-8.
1 :_ 100.00%; __ -~j_ -~·00%\ --~~,S48',i
City __ _,____ I
·--- CityofS;~-;;(1~-r;·---·-!---- : i ----;---
58,593\
ss,s93f ·
58,593:
0 o'
58,593
. -- --- ·· Precinct; 2,1981 100.00%: Oj O.OO¾i
Vote by Ma\i 31,350: 100.00%1! 0
1 0.00%
2,198i
!
-31~
I
Ci~c:~:~:~:~•ra.• ~0:1: .. -~3~::~: --. or. 000%! . ~
Precinct; 0 ··---.-----------01.___ 0
__ v~te·by·M~i~:--·---o,-________ ·----------~!. oj
Cumulative -Total' 0' o: a:

City~ Total! j3~s48 -,oo.W/4: _____ -- . -o;· 0.00% 33,548 12/2/2020 7:28:39 PM
Page: 77 of 120
City of Santa Clara, City Clerk (Vote for 1)
Precinct
Countywide
Electionwide
0009001
Precinct
Vote by Mail'
Total
0009005
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009051
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009055
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009056
Prednct
Vote by ~lail
Total
00~059
Precinct
Vote by M.;i!
Total
0009061
Precinct
Vote~ r.~ai!
Total
0009062
Precinct
Vote by ~lail
Total
0009101
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009103
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009104
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009109
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009151
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total
0009157
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009163
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
OC09166
Precinct
2,406;
2,638
360
3,635
3,991.
161

1.446
1,607
58 59
218

2.449

2.667
221
2,001.
118
175
2,626
64 760
824
132
2,416
2,548
127:
1,502
1,629
171
2,269
2,440
214'

2.751:
2,965'
55 1,212_
1,267
72 . ·- -
1l
-i E
~ ~ Precinct
3,165
3,165,
•0009005
4,703
4,703,:
4,703! __ '. __
i,0009051
1,9911
1,991'
1,991
67 67

67. 3,199
3,199
3,199
0009055
0009056
--·00090s9
2,765
2,765;
2,765·
:0009061
o,
0 O'
•0009062
2,525
2,s2s·
2,525
3,389
3,389
3,389
995'
995
995,
0009101
0009103
.00091()4
2,986
2,986
2,986:
-;0009"109
1,982:
1,982
1,982;
000915,.

Total' 1,797i 100.00%; o: 0.00%: 1,797!
·------- ·---t------; : -------7
Pr,:?cinct' 252! 100.00%: oj 0.00%\ · 2s2J
_ Vote by-~~~ . 2,49ji _ 100.00%: O! O.OO%r~--W31
Total' 2,745: 100.00%
1 ~l o.oo%i 2,74Si
' i -·-·1----,
Precinct 107: -,oo.00¾; o; o.00%/·- 107•
l i
Vote by Mail: 01 . 0.00%: 1,047;
----•--------- -o: 0.00%' 1,1s4 Total, 1,154' 100.00%;
- i
Vote by Mau:

Total: 35 100.00%
147' 100.00%
. i:678,- 100.00%:

0.00%1 ; 1.
'
34,
o; ~~)-~--~~:
- o; o.OO%i - 147:
--·-o: 0.00%; -----,:&1s:

Total 1.825" 100.00%'
Vote by Mail
1 ! 1,426 100.00%, o
1 0.00%
1 l,426
· - Total; · - -1.566~ ·100.00% o] o.00%! 1,566'
----------·--·-···---· - - --~'--- I I I
Pre~inct; 0, - -or· -----1-----o;!
-- Voteby-M~iil ______ ~~' ··-or·-·-
-----,o-ci----'-i -_-_-_-_-_-:::o;
Prednct;
Vote byMaiti
T01;1r
65, 100.00%,
----'----1,425: 100.00%
' ;
· 1,490: 100.w .. / --
112 "100.00¾, --
I
o: 0.00%'
-- ------------0' 0.00%:
---- ---------
112
1,844 1·00.00%1 01 0.00%' 1,844
·- 1,956 · 100.00%
1 ----- o! 0.00%,: 1,9s6
Vote by Mail,
Total'
'
Precinct; 84 100.00¾ o! 0.00%'
·vot~bYMa-if 1.665' 100.00¼' oj 0.00%:
________ L ___ -------•. ____ i ______ _, --~--·
Total\ 1,749: 100.00%: 0.00¾!
______ i
Predncli
i
-- 1s 100.oov) ----- o~
i i
1,035: 100.00%1
: '
i

0.00¾! :

0.00%'.
41'
541
582;
1,6651
1,749'
78 1,035
.-• -----------·:r-----c-:-+--c:c---+--Totali 1,113: 100.00%: o: 0.00%! 1,113, -------;-- : - i 1 i
2,951'
2,951'
2,951
. PreCiflC{ 111 100.00%1 i} - o.oo%T ____ ----111:
--- · -· ··· Vote by Mani 1,542\- 100.00") Oi 0.00%'. --~ --- -·---- ----·-· _______ I "'--------- -- i i ,,542J
'0009157
3,619
3,619
3,619·:
:0009163
1,454;
1,454
1,454'
1,445
0009i66
~- _ -~~~: ______ ~.6~; ~~-00%L oi 0.00%; 1,6531
______ . ___ i____ ' !
Precinct,: 136: 100.00½i -·or 0.00%1 136i
I ' ! ! I I
VotebyMail' 1,911fl0Qooii- o\ O.O<Y/41 1:S,-1-:
_____ 1 .. ___ --- -·'--------·-----L ___ J ____________ , Tota!i 2,047 100.00% 0
1 : 0.00%,i 2,047:
··----· ··--------- -~---' -----; ---~
·--- ---- _____ i ____ _
Precinct 36, 100.00% O! 0.00¾[
-- V~t;-by M;il!""
----L.

Total:
8-1£;:· 100:00%---·--- Oi O.CO¾' 815;
---------~---}---- ---'.- -· -------~'
851 100.00%: o. 0.00%; 851
!
Pre-,i-~~t; 44 100,0-0%
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 77of 120
0009201
0009203
0009208
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
1,192
1,264
45 720
1,446
1,537
107,
1,159
1,266!

1.445
1,445,
891
891'
- - ----~----
0009201
Vote by Mail'
Precinct
Vote by Mail
833 100.00%
877, 100.00%
30 100.00%
488 100.00%
o' 0.00%

0.00¼
0 0.00%
0,00¼

0.00%
- --------- ---- - -- ---------------

1.773'
1,7731
:0009208
1,660,
1,660,
1,660:

Precioo'
Vote by Mail:

Total'
1,029. 100.00% 000%

0.00%
---- ---------- -
I
66 100.00%
---------.-----
786 100.00% o, 000%
------ .................... .
852 100.00% 0 0.00%
··-·····- ... --.. ,--- .... ---~-------
:0009210
.. --·------~----: 0009210
Precinct
--------------
Vote by Mail
Total
C009219
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009220
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009251
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009252
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009258
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009262
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
0009264
Pre-cinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0:)09268
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009275
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
0009282
Precinct
.... ----·----------------·---------·---- ..

Precinct' 122 a215:
1,906
176
157
2,230
a101
67 1,151
1,218
110
1,727
1,837
1,484
a215'
:0009219
2,840
_0009251
1,343
1,343'
1,343
... '0009252
a1•6
a145
2,145
1,901;
1,614 1,901]
- ·-- . --i0009262
69: 100.00%
-- _______ L..,_____ ____ .. ----··- -·----
Vote by Mail, 1.224; 100.00%
Total!
Precinct
Vote by M~il:

Total
Predru::t
1,293 100.00%
7 lC0.00%
107 100.00%
114 100.00¾
105 100.00%
Vote by Mail 1,521 100.00%
---------·---~--
Total 1,626 10000%
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct'
40 100.00%
768 100.00¾
808 100.CO¾
65 100.00%

1. 159 100.00%
1,224 100.00%
89 100.00½
- -------·
Vote by Mail S92 lOOJXY'/4
Total 1,081 100.00%
11: ·-;6;r·--·------- ----·--p~ec1n~------ 4 100.00%
-------,48--100.ooi' ·-
214
70 1,712
1,782
76 1,718

1.796
128
1,542
267: Vote by Mail
Total: 152 100.00%
--------- --- ----
iOOJ9264
1,9991_
1,999;
1,999
2,037,
2,037'
i0009275
Pre<inct' 40 100.00¾
--- -· --'/~te· b:{ ~i~i[-- 1,063 100.00%
Total 1,103 100.00%
----
- --- ----- ----
Precinct_ 49 10:J.00%
Vote by Mail;
Total

1.('98 100.00%
1,147 100.00¾'

2.049: Precinct 85 100.00%·
: ---- ----------~---- -
Vote by Mail 1,022 100.00%

1.107 100.00%
o, 0.00%
ci" 0.00%
:
0 0.00%
0 0

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00¾

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
--0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00¼
0 0.00%
·o 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00'>,'
o, 000%'

0.00%

0.00%'
0 0.00%
0: 0.00%
o· 0.00%
_ _).~~:2s2 ______________ . ____ . -~~-:~ _-__ -_ - -----·· -- ---

0.00%
3_ ----~l._ _ -----~~~net: 1, 100.00% o
Vote by ~t~!~--~ __ s ·--~---_:) ______ v_o1_, _by_M_•--'i1\ ·- 5:-100~00% ___ " __ si si Total'.

0.00½

0.00"/2 Total
Electionwide - Tota!
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
-- ~~~~ ?Y Mail
Tot;il
Cumulative. Total
Count1wide • Total
Congressional District
17th Congressional District
0009001
100.00¾
-----'-----'-----=:--~~~~-.--------
49,286 58,593; E!ectionwide • Total:

Precinct
---------· ·-- -- --·------
Vote by Mail
Total o· ------Cumulative~ Total O
- --~--~~-·-- ---·--~-------
49,286. 58,593\ Countywide • Total
Congressional District
17th Congressional District
'0009001
33,548 100.00% 0.00%
833
877
JO
488
518
4S
1,029
66 786
852
69 1,224
1,293
107
114
105
1,521

1.626
40 768
808
65 1,159

1.224
69 992
1,081
148
152
40 1,063
1,103
49 1,098
1,147
85 1,022
1,107
0 ll,548
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: '77 of 120
Ptecinct 232
Vcte by Mail 2,406
Total 2,63$
0009005
Precinct 360
Vote byMuil 3,635
Total 3,995,
00090$1
Precinct 161
Vote by Mail 1,446
Total. 1,607
C-009055
Precinct 1
Vote by Mail 58
Total 59
0009056
Precinct 218
Vote by Mail 2.449
Total 2,667
00)9059
Precinct 221
Vote by Mail aoo1
Total 2,222
0009061
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total 0
0009062
Precinct 118
Vote by Mail ~043
Total 2,161
0009101
Precinct 175
Vote by Mail 2,626
Total 2,801
00:,)9103
Precinct 64
Vote by Mai! 760
Total 824
C0091C-1
Precinct 132
Vote by Mail 2.416
Total 2,548
0009109
Precinct 127
Vote by Mail 1,502
Tota! 1,629
0009151
Precinct 171
Vote by Mail 2,269
Total 2,440
0009157
Precinct 214
Vote by Mail. 2,751
Total 2,965
OC-09163
Precinct
Vote by Mail 1,212,
Total 1,267
0009166
Precinct 72
Vote by Mai! 1,192
Tot~I 1,264
0009201
Precinct 45
Vole by Mail 720
Tola! 765
0009203
3,16S
3,165
3,165:
:0009005
4,703:
4,;~3,1 ·

4.7oi' --
10009051
Precinct, o:- -0.00% ~- -- - 146
v-~te ~~~~~[_ 1,651 100.00%, - 0 oM
1 1.6s1i
--~-- ~--1 -- ____ _! ________ ---
TotaJi 1.797 100.00%: 0 0.00%: 1,797!
2,493:

Total! 2.745 100.000( 01 -o.00% I --z745i
- I 1 - -------1 --------:-·------;
- - Precinct! 107 100.00'/4'' Oj 0.00%: -- 107;'

I - I I --------'
1,9911
1,991)
1,991
_ ··---··~~~~~~-Maill 1,047 100.00¾1 01 0.00% 1,047i
Tota!i1 1,154 100.00%
1 1 --o-1-0.00%:~--,,15{
'ooosos5
67;
67/
:0009056
3,199
3,199

3.199

2.765

2.765
0009059
0009061
0 2.525'

2.525

2.525
0009062
10009101
3,389
3,389
3,369
,0009103
995
995
995
C009104
2,986
<986

2.986'
0009109
1,982
1,982
1,982
!0009,-51-
2,951:
2,951,

2.951;
-]00091-57
_____ '.';;;-~~:- -~ 10000¾\---- - o;--000/-~-~I
Vote by Mail: 34 100.00¾: oi
-··-J. _____ , ______ __1_'.

Tota!j 35: 100.00%
1 o:

0.00%1 34
I
Precinct'
• t i
100.00"l o!--o.00¾( _____ -·-· 147:

I
- ----- -Total: 1,825 100.00¾-- O - 0.00%--- ~5
p;e,i-nct:--- -----140-·-,-oo.OOo/;­
·vote-bY M~li( --
1 1,426 100.00%;
Totali - 1,566 100.00% 0 -~00%:
140
1,426
1,566
Pree.ind --- 0 - 0 0
--v~te·by-M;11i··
----~--~---~ 0 -- -- ·: ---------···-~·
Total,
' I '
1,490: 100.00% 0' 000%, ---1.490
______ i _______________ _
Pre:-cincti 112 100,00¾
I '

0.00%' - - - Vot;by,Mail\ 1,844 ·1·ooooi~----------
T;t;1;··--~,.956 100.00%' . 0, O.OY./4!
Vote by Mai!
v;te by Mi3il -
- --T~t_a_l,.

I
41 100.00%;
541: 100.00¾
64 100.00%,
0 0.00%
I
1,66s 100.00% · 0
1 --- o.oo¾;
1,749, 100.00% o; --a.DO%
78 1()00()% O! 0.00%:
1,844'
1,956
41 541
S4
1,665
1,749
---\i;te by.Mail: 1,oiS: 100.00% - ai 0.00%i--------,~035 : ' ' ! t
·-T~tar 1,113. 100.00%: - Oi o.00%' 1,113_
·1- •--; ·- -~-: ------i-- . -----
,, . ____ :___ i t
Pre~i~~tr- 111i 100.00% ·01 . O.OO¾f-
- -v~te by-tialt;' 1,542 100.00% 0' 0.0o-?~i
!
111:
___ _J
1,542!

1.4s4'. ~-------- - __ Vote by M-•~ill ____ a1-;s! 100.00%:
1,4s4; Tola1i es,(10-0.00%~- o· 0.00%!
j00091_66_

1.445 1
1,445
1,44S
891
891:
891"
0009201
0009203
,
.. Preci~ctf-­
i
Vote·by-~.\all,:
. T;;ta1i
- --· _!___
Precinct
Vote by Mail'
I
Total;
44 100.00%'
i : - --- - -i
------ir- ci:00%1- --.:,i
833:-··100~00¾: _____ ~_ o.oo-¼;------· s3ij
·- sn~ 10-0.oo½'. - oi --0.00%! --- - sni
-- ----~··-····---- ·'-- -- --··---'
30 100.00%
48S: 100,00%,
518 100.00%
30 ------oi --·o.W1~
o~.oo_,.'¾,-,'--, ---4~88
'
-- : I
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 77 of 120
0009208
0009210
0009219
0009220
0009251
0:>09252
0009258
0009262
0009264
0009268
0009275
0009282
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Ptednct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mall
Total
Precinct
Vote byM;;i!
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mall
Total
17th Congressioiial DiStflCt-=--
Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
91 1,446
1,537
107
122
1,784
1,773'
1,773
1,6601
:0009210
2,215
2,215\
!0009219
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Precinct
--·---·--------
Precinct
48 100.00%
1,029 100~00%.
1,077 100.00%.
66 100.00¾
786 100.00%
852 100.00%
69 100JJO%
---------------- -----------
Vote by Mail; 1,224 100.00%
1,293, 100.00%
--------------'---- -------' ' I ---------------
12: __ ---=~~) ______ __ P_,ec_1n_,~\ ____ 1, -~~~--------- 1761 231j VotebyMaili 107 100.00%
--'------':-----------'--
188 · 231 i Total
1 114 100.00%
----~------- --•:oo~uo-·-------------------
"' _______________ -
Precinct,
2,230 VotebyMaU:
2,387 2,8401 Totat:
- ---------- -----•- ._.! ______ _
10S 100.00%
1,521' 100.00%
1,626, 100.00%
--- __________ _1_~9251
67 1,343: Precinct'
~-~S1 - 1,343! - ---------V-o-tebyMaii:
1,218 1,343:
0009252
110 2,146
1,727
1,837
130
1,484
1,614
11,
214
2,146
,0009258
1,901
1,901'
267
267'
0009262
--------- --------···------· Tota! 808 100.00%
Prednct'
Vote by Mail 1,159 100.00¾.

Total 1,224 100.00%
Precinct 89 100.00%
_" ____ , ____ ----
Vote by Mall: 992 100.00%
Total
Prednct·
VotebyM~(­
Tota!
Precinct
1,08 l 100.00%
4 100.03%
146 100.00%
152 100.00¾
· 40, 100.(}J%
1,063 100.00%

0.00%

0.00¾

0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%
O,

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%,

0.00%

0.00%
'

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%.
. _ ---~~~~~~--- 1,999i ~-----v_o_,,_b_y_Mai!:
1,782: 1,999, Total; 1,103 ··100.00% - - 0.00%
78 1,796_
128
<
1,670
o'
'0009268
2,037,
2,037
'0009275
2,049
Precinct· 49 100.00¾"
Vota by Mail' 1,098 100.00¾
Total 1,147 100.00%
Precinct
2,049_' Vote by Mail
as 100:00,i-
1,022, 100.00%
1,107 100.00% 2,049 Tota!
0009282
Precinct
Vote by Mall 5 100.00%
Total
17th Congressional District - 33,548 100.00%
______________ Tot:ol _
Cumulative ------
:cumulative
o, Precinct 0.

0.00%
o: 0.00¾
O.W/2

0.00%
0 0.00%

0.00%'

0.00%
Oi 0.00%· ..
o, 0.00%
___ VotebyMall-----~--0, - o; · Vote by Mail• ·- O, · o:
0 - -o·:· Total 0; 0 Total
Cumulative - Total
Congressional District. Total
State Senator
10th Senatorial Distrit-t
0009001
0009005
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
-- --or-~- 0, Cum~lative--T-o-ta-1,----0"-,
--4-9-,2-86~(---58-,5-93: -c~ngm;ional Distric:t-Total: 33,548, 100.00%: 0 0.00'%, State Senator
-·- - - i 10th Senatorial District
10009001
Precinct 232 3,165:

J < -----· -- ••• -·~-----··-- •• I_.
2,406. 3,165! Vote by Man: 1,651 100.00%
_____ . ------·-------!
2,638
1 3,165; Total: 1,797 100.00%
-~ :-- + --------- ···---·-----------·----
0009005
--·--·--·-----
l,635
3,995
4,703
4,703'
4,703'
Precinct' 252. 100.00%. -
Vote by MaH;-­
Total;
2,493, 100.00%
2,745 100.00%
o. 0.00%'

0.00%.

0.00%

0.00%
48 1,029
1,077
66 785
852
69 1,224
1,293
107
114
105
1,521
1,626
40 768
aoa·
65 1,159
1,224
89 992
1,081
148
152
40 1,063
i,101
49 1,098

1.147
85 1,022
1,107
33,548
146
1,651
1,797
252

2.493
2,745
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page:'77of120
0009051
0009055
0009056
0009059
0009061
0009062
00{)9101
0009103
00~9104
0009109
0009151
0009157
0009163
0009166
0009201
0009203
0009208
0009210
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Pre<:in-ct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct'.

Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by M,3il
Totai
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
TotµI
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total
Precin(t
Vote by Mail.

Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Predncl
Vote by Mail
Total
161
1,446
1,607
58 59
218
2,449
2,667
221:
2,001
2,222.
118
2,161
175
2,626
2,801
64 760'
824
2,416
2,5'18
127
1,502
1,629
171
2,269
2,440
214

2.751
2,965
55'
1,212
72 1,192
1,264,
720
765
91 1,446
1,537
107
1,159
1,266
10009051
1,991
1,991'.
1,991;
, ' . ' ·-·---·
Precin(t: 107
1 ' 100.00%, o; o.00%~ 1()7:
1,15{ -10Q.Q{}')((- 0i 0.00%]
-: ---- i -----.,- ! ------l
1,154'
67! ________ Prec'.:~i ,-1 100.00¾! oj 0.00%: 1i
67, Vote by Mail! 34i 100.00%1 oi o.oo•x,'. -34:
67i
000905
~ -·-· ~~~~~:Total/--·-- 35; ·-~~~~f~~--J~o.w/4'·---35\ 3~1~-~·:. _________ Precincti 147 100.00%! 01 0.00% 147:
3,199; Vote by Mai!j 1,678 100.00%! 01 0.00%' 1,678\
3,199' --Total;-- 1,825 100.00¾1---- 01 0.00%, 1,s2s:
~000_9_059 - . i ·- -------__________ ! - ··-i------ ,-· - ! 2,765; Precinct! 140 100.00%! o: 0.00% 140-;
2,76s;
0009061
o,
'0009062
2,525,
2,52S

2.525
3,389
3,389
3,389
0009101
,0009103
995
995
995
0003104.
2,986
2,986
2,986
1,982
1,982
1,982·
2,951
2,951
3,619
3,619
3,619'
0009109
0009157
)0009163
1,454:
1,454[
1,454
· ,00-09166 .
1,445:
1,445)
1,445;
I0C-09201
·---'---
891'
891;
891
1,773
1,773
1,773,
0009203.
. ,0009208.
1,660
j I i __ _i _____ . ______ . ____ .
· Vote by Mailj · --1,426: 100.00¾i 0j 0.00%! 1,426'.

T~talj 1,566 100.00¼'. O!
, - ·- ·, I - -·
Precincti
Vote by Mail;
Total,
Precioct
Vote by Mail!
Total'
o;
o· o: ·-o ----: ----o; --
I '
' )
- -----------.

I
1,42s' 100.00¾; ---
1,490 100.00%
0 O.W¾'
i

0.00%'
I
o.ocr/4. 1,490
o; 0.00%, 112
.. ------ , _____ _
Vote by Mai!: 1,844; i00.00%
---··-----------·
Total 1,956: 100.00%:
, --'-------~· ·-----------~
- --· ---- !--~-----·--. _______ i _______ ~--c,,-'----- Precincti 41 100.00%; a: 0.00~(
Vote by M~il! 0.00%
I
Total: 6: 000%:
- .•
582
Vote by Mail - 1,665 100.00"/2 --- - . Oi 0.00%'
i
Total.
t I :
1,149. 100.00¼ al o.ooix.. 1.149,· . ! I
! ·-•---,--·--· .-..

PreCl~C{ _______ · 78- 100.00%, o: - 0.00%' 78
v·~te-bY rA~il'.·-
Total:
100.00% 111
Vote by Maili 1,542 100.CO% ·-O.OO¾i------,~s42
Tota!;
- -- ' ------· ------1~----~----
1,653 100.00% o; o.oo¾: ,,653
, ______ -L ________ .. __ ..

Precinct: 136[ 100.00% _____ Oj -~~~ ___ -~
Vote by Mail 1,911, 100.00% 0, 0.00¼' 1,911;
----~---·--~------ ,
~l-='~::;-__ -_ r:t -,:
-----Vote b-~ ~~ilt a1s; 100.00%
1 o/ 0.00¾/ - 81~
Totali 8S1'. 100.W/4' Oi O.CO¾\ s511
-·-·-·---i---· . . ·· 1---i---
Precinct\ - 44, 100.00%: j 0.00¾\
VotebyMaili 833: 100.00%; ------ o;- -0.00%]--
. Tot;I: 877• 100,00¼: O! 0,00%! ... 8771
, -- I 7
_____ -~'-~~n-ctj 301 100.00%1 Qi 0.00%1 ------30:

Vote by 1'.faili 488: 100.00%; 01 O.OO¾i -----488-
.. Total: s1a; 100~~: ___ ~. 0!-0~~----s,d:
. __ L 1 1 1 !
Precinct,: 48'. 100.00% --o:--0~00¾! ---·---4s;
--vot~·by M;ii- - 1,029; 100.00%' o: --o.00%~ ---- 1,029i I '
Total' 1,077: 100.00% oi o.00%:

Precinct'
'i ;
66: ,oo.00% --~---o:~~------ 66
1,660 - ·-v~t;by-M~if-
----··--' ___ . ___ le_ __
786' 100.00%, or 0.00%! 786:
1,660 Total aSi; -,-00'.00%; ---- 7 0.0-0%-; as21
.. ! .
0009210
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 77 of 120
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009219
Prec:inct
Vote by Mail
Total
OJ09220
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
(}{}09251
122 2,21sj Precinct:
- ---------;----· ·--" - -- ----------------
Vote by Mail: 1.784 2,21s:
1,906
157
2,230
2,387
--~--
2,215'
2,840i __
2,840: Vote by Mail
2,840; _________ _ Total
•0009251
------
69 100.00%
1,224 100.00¾
7 100.00%
107' 100.00%
-,-,4,- 100.00%
105 100.00%
--~----
1,521 100.00%'
1,626 100.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00% -

0.00%

0.00%
• 0. 0.00%
o. 0.00%

0.00%
Precinct 67° 1,343/ _______ P_,._ci_n,_t: ______ ~-~~~~·-- _ 0.00%

0.00%
0009252
"0009258
0009262
0009264
0009268
0009275
0009262
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail'
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vole by Mail
Tot31
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
10th Senatorial District - Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote?y ~a~_
Total
Cumulative - Total
State Senator - Tota!
Membei-of thi? State
Assem_blv_
25th ~~e~~tr_~str~ct
0009001
0009005
00090S1
0009055
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Prednct
Vote by Mail
Tot3l
Prednct
Vote by Mai!
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
1,151
1,218
110
1,727
1,343:
1,343!
10009252'
2,146j
Vote by Maii: 768, 100.00%
Totaf 808 100.00¾'
-,--- ____ J ·----------------.

Precinct; 65 100.00%·
2,1461 Vote by Mailj
·--·--- .. --+---------'---- -·---- --
2,146! Total 1,224 100.00¾ 1,837,
_ -- /0009258
1,901i 130 Precindl
o; 0.00%
--·- ---·-----
0 0.00%
--ii,-- 0.00%
0 0.00%
- -~,484 --~~r-------Vote by Mail_----992;- 100.00% ---- --·-·o--o.00%'" - ' _______ : --~:
1,614 · 1,901 ! Total: 1.08 l 100.W'/4 0 0.00%
11 70
76 1.718,
1,796
:0009262
267\
267
1,999
0009264
;0009266
2,037
2,037(
0009275
2,049
2,049·
Precinct 4 100.00%
Vote by Mail 148 100.00%
Total 152 100.00%
Precinct,
Vote by Mall
Total
Precinct
vOteby Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
40 100.00%
,:00·3 100.00%
1,103 100.00%
49 100.00%
1,096 100.00%
1,147 ioo.oo¾
85 100.00%

1.022 100.00%
0 0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%
0 0.00%

0.00"/2

0.00%

0.00%.

0.00%

0.00"/2

0.00%
. --~--------------
126
1,542
l,610: 2.049.
\0009282
5;
Total 1,107 100.00% 0 0.00%'
3:
5'
49,286·
··-------~---Precinct 1 100.00¾
·-- J-------------,---,--------s; Vote by Mail s 100.00% 33,548 100.00%
Total: 0
---·-----------·---·
Cumulat!Ve - Total 0 - -------- ,_
·- State Senator- Total' 33,548·'-- 100~00% 56,593:

Member Of,the slate '
Assembly
25th Assembly District
--------·---- 10009001"'" _______ , _____ ,_,..,
232' 3,165 Precinct 146" 100.00%
--- ~-------- --~- --·--.
2,40£ 3,165 Vote by MaHi 1,651: 100.00%'
·-----1-
2,638. 3,1651
1 Total:
______ I
____ , ________ \0009005--
4,703i Precinct'
.---------
3,6351 4,:~~l Vote by Mail:
·---~·995: 4,703.,..1 -----
-+-----,j0009051
1,991:

Tot3I:

Precinct'
I
1,797' 100.00%
252 100.00%
2,493; 100.00%
2,14s: mo.co%
107 100.00%
1,446;
1,607,
1,9911. Vote by Maf 1,047 100.00% ·
i ___________________ _,.
~.9;1-j Total
10009055
Precinct
Vote by Mo11
Total
1,154 100.00%,
1 100.00%
34, 100.00%
35_ 100.00%
o' 0.00%
0 0.00%'

0.00%
0,
0 0.00%
o, 0.00%
o'. 0:00%:
0 0.00%'

0.00%
.. 0. O.OOo/,
o' · 0.0011
o: 0.00%

0.00%
69 1,224

1.293
107
114
105
1,521
1,626
40 766
806
65 1,159
-1,224
148
152
40 1,063
1,103
49 1,098
1,147
65 1,022
1,107
33,548
33,548
146
252
2,493
2,745
107
1,154
34 35
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: -77 of 120
0009056
Prednct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009059
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009C61
Prednct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009062
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total
0009101
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
0009103
P1ecinct
Vote by Mall
Tota!
C009104
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009109
Precinct
Vote by Mail,
Tota!
0009151
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
00091S7
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
0009163
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009166
Precinct
Vote by M,1il
Tota!
OC09201
Precinct
Vore by Mail
Total
0009203
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total·
'0009208
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
0009210
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009219
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009220
218

2.449

2.667
221.

2.001
2,222:
0,
0 118

2.043
2,161
175
2,626
2,801
€4
760
824
132

2.416
2,548
127
t,502
1,629
171
2,269
2,440
214
2,751
2,96S
55 1,212
1,267
72 1,192
1,264
45 720,
765
91 1,446:
1,537:
107
1,159
1,266
122
1,784,
1,906
12 176
188
0009056
3,199:
\0009059
2,765!

2.765:
2,765'
;0009061
100-09062 ..
-i~-
2525

2.525,
2,525
3,389
3,389
995
995
995

2.986
0009101
0009103
0009104
10009103
1,982:
1,982,
1,982
- ---OOQ91sl·

2.951
2,951'

2.951
3,619
3,619
3,619
1,454
1,454,
1,454,
00091S7
0009163
!0009166
1,445:
1,445.
,,,us)
:0000201
891)
891
891,
i0009203

1.773
1,773;
1,773'
--;0009208""
1,660
1,660
1,660
2,215
2,215
231
231
231
0009219
0009220
-- ·----------· _ _, _____ _
Precinct 147 100.00% o; 0.00% 147
: I
VotebyM-;ttj 1,678; 100.00%; ol o.w.<.: 1,678
1 --------------- -----·-_________ I - --------
Total,: 1.825 100.00%/ 01~0.00o/;·-
T.
01 0,00¼
oi 0,00¼
Precinctj 140 10000¾
1 -vo'"t~by-Milr 1,426: ,"00-,,-."'-=;----!------
O' 0.00'.<.:

I
Tota,1 1,566 - 100.00¼i- ·- -
' ' -~' -----i-
_ _,__ ____ t~----
-P,ecinct'. o; o'
-Vote by tA3il[ ___ ---so; ___ ,. ____ o[
_Total; _____ -~\_ o: \
VotebyMai11
------r~ta-\i­
!
----- ---~----
1,425' 100.oox.: 0.00%1
i '
112. 100.00%, 0 0,00%-,---
1,844 100.00%1 ___ _
0 0.00%]
1,82S

1.844
. --i Total! 1,956 100_00"/4! 0 0.00% 1,956'
Pr«;,~:;---- - •11 1~0~/ - .·-- o/ :~~~:==--.,
Vote by Mail -- 541 100.00%: o: 0,00%
1 ________ L_ __
541•
i
Total: 100,00o/i o; 0.00%
Precinct ---- 84_: 10000%1; a; -om%' --- 84:

Vote byz~:i _ ---:::::: :::t-~~~-------c':1~--:-:-c',,\--. -_ -----;;; -1 --~=:·~~~=-c~=----··
1 - --- I
----~~~~~~~:___ 1a 100.00%/ o' 0.00%' 78:
_ v::~~~~~~1_1 ______ ~ ,.~35'_ ,~.00%L ___ -----~; ___ o.00%_--. ---1.-03-5 Totaq 1,113; 100.CG%: 0,
i

0.00¼, 1,113
---p~ec1n~t'.

I
Vote by Mal(
Total!
Precinct,
V~te by. ~1~ii':

To1~1!
1·
Precinct:
· Vote"t;Yt.1;il;-
Total·
I
,_,, __ , ________ __! --------- ------
111, 100,00%'. o: 0,00%) 111,
1,542
1 100.C-O¾j
--·1,653: 100,00%~
1,911; 100.00%
2,047i 100.00%
36 100.00%
815 100.00%
851 100,00%
_____ i

0.00%; 1,542 0,
1,653
Qi 0.00%1

0.00%1 1,911,
oj o.00% a041
-o·' --·ow,{--·-·----i(;'
Q; o.oow-----a,5'
o:

I
851,
--T
-Preci-~Ctf- --:co.r--0-.00"'%--+:----4-'4.
, _________ ,_! -------~---1
44, 100,00%'
Vote by Ma~l____ Oi O.CO¾i
Total! ----~----o'-i o.CO%( - - aTTj
8331 100.00%'
I
877) 100.00%:
i l Jo: 100.00%' al o.00%1 3ol
'""\::L ::G;:!~ ~ :1 -:1 _ _:::
.. --------- • I ! ; I
Prednctj •18: t00.00%i O! o.00%! 48!
. --~:~. by M~I _____ 1,029; ,~~~%)_____ 01 0.00%) 1,0291 Total! 1,077'. 100.00% o· 0.00%! 1,077!
! I i I I
... :-;:1;,f;:i .. -f :f !
Total, 852' 100.00%1 o
1 0.00%/ 852!
Precinct:

Vote by Mail
Tota!:

Precinct:

Vote by Mail1
. ---~ ' ---- ' -·
-~ . ' '
1,224, ·,oo.00%! oi 0.00%; 1,224,
--1:293:100:-00%]: -·--o; ····o.oo¾f 1,293:
i I '. i -- !
1· ,OO.W/4;---~ -------o:--·o~OO%~ --
101 100.00%. o! ---0:-00%: --10:,
11:/ 1-00.00%i ______ Q:--iiQO¾:___ --1141
. -------- ------ - -- l
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 77 of 120
0009251
0009252
0009258
0009262
0009264
0009268
0009275
0009282
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Prednct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Preclnct
Vote by Mai!
Total
25th Assembly District• Tota!
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
-~c~e bt~fa~- ______ _
Total
Cumulative • Total
Meinber of the State Ass·emb!}' • ·
Total __
Board of Equalization (State)
67 1.151
1,218
110
1,343
1,343
1,343
2,146;
0009252
Precinct'.-
Vote by Mail
40 100.00%
768 100.00%
-------------------- ---
Total 808, 100.00%
Precinct;
Vote by Mail:

Precinct;
- 65' 100.00%
1,159 100.00%
o, 0.00%
105
1,521
·o - 0.00% 1.626

0.00%;
· o" 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
40 768
808
65 1,159
0 0.00% 1,224
0 0.00%
---------------------------· 0 0.00%
89 992 1,484
1,614.
11 214
225,
Vote by Mail: 992 100.00%,
___ ,. _____________ ------·
1,9011 Total; 1,081' 100.00% O 0.00½. 1,081
----------'
;00092_62 ______ ~
2671 Precinct: 4 100.00¾' 0.00%'
I ---------'---- -- . ___________ '
Vote by Mail: 148 100.00% o· 0.00%·
---- -----'-------'------~--: _____ i_
Total: 152: 100.00%·
I
267/
2671 0.00%'
:0009264
148
152
- ___ ,__ :----
Prednct'
I

40. 100.00%
1,063 100.00%
40 1,063
70'

1.712
1,782
78 1,718:
1,796
128
1,542
1,999;
1,9991 Vote by Mail:
1,999; Total
:0009268
Prednc<
------
~037[
2,037,
2,049
VotebyMail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
1,103 100.00%
49 100.00%
1,098, 100.00%
--- ------ -----
1,147 100.00%
85 100.00%
1,022 100.W'/4
----- ·----------· -
1,670. 2,049' Tota! 1,107 100.00%
8·
49,286
49,286'
58,S93
·0009282
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
--------------
25th As5emb!y District· Tot;I
Cumulative
:cumulative
Precinct
1 100.00%
5 100.00¾
6 100.00%
33,548 100.00%
o· ~------Vote.byMail - -
0, Total
01 Cu_m_u~l,~tiv~e~--To-,,-,----
S8S93: MemberoftheStateAssembly, 33,548 100.00%
-' --;----~--------'Iot.:ol' ____________ _
; Board of Equalization (State)
, , State eOard of Eq"ualizatfon ; -- -

0.00%
•--- ------·-·--

0.00% 1,103

0.00%

0.00%
o. ·0.00%·

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%
O' 0.00%
0 o'

0.00%

0.00%,

0.00%
49 1,098
1,147
85 1,022
1,107
33,548
0 0
33,548
state Boa·rd·onqUlJ1izlJtiOO-­
__ lf2_ ---------------- #2~------
0009001
0009005
0009051
0009055
0009056
0009059
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Pre<inct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
2,406
2,638
360.
3,995
1611
1,446
1,607'
'0009001
-- -~--\ -
3,165'
3,165<
.0009005
4,703
1 '1,703
0009051
Vote by Mail:

Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail:
rota,··
146 100.00%
1,651 100.00%
1,797 100.00%
252 100.00%

2.493 100.00%
2,745. 100.00%
-----------'---- ------··---- - --·----------·-----
1,991'. Precinct,
1,991\ Vote by Mail;
1,99·;;-- --- -- --- ---TOta1:-~
101: 100.00%_
1,047 100.00%'

0.(}0%

0.00'¼

0.00%

0.00%
O· 0.00%
o' 0.00%·
-+------·--::0~~ _--===::_c_ 1'. 5/ _____ Precinct; --,-,~1cc0-0.0_0%_0,_, --- ·-o,···-o_CJO% 61: Vote by Mailf___ -·-34··-100-:00%- 0.00%
-~--_I__ __
35 loo~OO¼ .. 0.00%: Total:
---------------~-------
-------------- ---- ··'~ooo_9o_s_6 ______ :.._--_--~-------~-----' ---- Ptecinct
Vote by Mali
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
218 3,199: Precinct; 147 100.00"i.i 0.00%
;
3,199; Vote- by Mail: 1,678 100Ji<i¼•--------·0 1 0.00% 2,449,
2,667 --- 3,1991 - -- . Total: 1,825 100.00% o; · 0.00% ------ •0009059
Precinct:
2,001
~7_6_~1_,,_
2,765
140 100.00%
Vote by Maii, 1,426 100.00%
146
1,651
1,797
252
2,493
2,745
107
1,04i
1,154
34 35
147
1,678
1,825
140

1.426
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: '77 of lZ0
Total
OOO<J061
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total'
0009G62
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009101
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
0009103
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009104
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009109
Prednct
Vote by Mai!
Total
0009151
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009157
Precinct
Vote by M~il
Tota!
0000163
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009166
Precinct
Vote by Mai1
Total
0009201
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009203
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total:
0009208
Precinct
Vote by Mail.

Tota!
,0009210
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009219
Precinct
Vole by Mail
Tota!
0009220
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009251
Precinct
Vote by Mail

2.222
118;
2,043 ~.
2,161:
175'
;:;26'
2,801
64 760
824
132
2,416
2,548
127
1,502
1,629
171
2,269
2,440
214
2,751
2,965
55 1,212,
1,267
72 1,192
1,264
45,
720
765
91:
1,446
1,537
1oi
1,159,
1,2661 ..
1,784
1,906
12 176
188:
157
2,230
2,387
67 1,151
2,765
3,389'
:0009103
995'
995
995
2,986

2.986
2,986
C009104
.0009109
1,982
1,982
1,982,
. '.0009151

2.95\

2.951
2,951
3,619
1 3,619
3,619
1,454
1,454
1,454
1,445
1,445'
1,445
0009157
0009163
,0009201
891
891
:·
1,773]
1,773,
1,7731
. i0009208
1,660,
' ' '
---- Precincti 41 100.00%: o: 0.00%
. ------------- o,
o; o.oo~-
Vote b~ Ma_\ 54\ 100,00¾;
Tota! [ 582' 1-00.00% 1 -
I
41 582
: : :

Prednct
V~t~ by Maili
I
84: lOO~W/4;' _______ - o.r- 0.00%; 84;
: i
1,665' 10000%' o· o.00%1 -
----- ---------·--r------- i
1,749' 100.00%: o, 0.00%'
1,665

1.749
·-------· --------·------
Pr-~d~~~i:__ 78
1 100.00%: O\ O.C)O%! 78'
Vote by Mail: 1,035) 100.00%' o; 0.OO¾i 1.0-351
--➔-- ----------~ -- ----· ---- i
Total; 1,113 100.00¾i ·01 -- 0.00%i 1,113·
-------~-------------· ·~-----;l __ -ji -~-- --)
____ , ___ ____!__ ______ -;.--~----!
Precinct! 111: 100.00% Oi 0.00%\
·v--;;te biriattf-- 1,542: 100.00"/2' - ·o!~~-- --,-.s4·z:

Total:- --l,6s3i--1-00.00%!-- o. ---0~00%~----1,6-53:

Precinct' 136,
Vote by -Mail] 1,9-11' 100.00% --Qi ___ QQO¾! --------1,-91-1; i ---------- I --------- ~-
Tota-![ 2.047: 100.00% o: o.oo¼: i041i
·--------
Precinct·
Vote by Mail I
Precinct:

I
. Vote ·by fi3J1!
-··r~1aq·
Precinct:
--! I
- - ------'------·---- -----: -·---'
36 100.00% 0' 0.00%1 36'
815 100.00%
851 100.00%
4{ 100.00%
815
0: 0.00% 85f
__ : --·-- ___ i -
833
811 100~~%-----~o:·-oooisj ___ ~a1i;
-· 30, 100.00% - a;· o.OO%i 30'.
488· too.CO¾----- - o; 0.00¾1 Vote by Mail]'
T~-t~i( - s18:-100~---- ~ oi- -0.00%;
- ; ' -- _________ !_ i
i
Predr.cti 48' 100.00% o: 0.00%\
_____ i __________ ,I ___ ....i...1 __
481
Vote-~-~~-~i~j_--~-~~i-~~~ Qi O.CO¾i
Total! 1,011; 100.W.{ --Of" ·o.c0¾1~·- --,~onj
. -T- ---r-----,------T-- i --7
Precinct: 661 100.00%'. 01 --0.00%1 66•:

Vote-bY Mail:, - 786: 100.00%' ------·-o\ ---- ---r--------l -·-o·rl . O.C-0%! 7861
1,660; Total)-- 852, 100.00%; 0.00¾) 852;'
:ooosiio ___ .. -- i- ------- ----
1,660)
2,215,
-·,
2,215'
·0009219
231:
231
231,
:0009220
2,840:
2,840
2,840
,000925,..
1,343
1,343'
Pr;;~----.,.59"",-1,.,oo.,._0_0_%+-, ----o~~-o-00%.,_jl_ --·-Ggi / II I
Vote by Maili 1,224 100.00%! al -o:rnmr· --1.224!
. T~t~ii-______ 1,293; 10000%; ____ - l~ 000%L __ --~3; ----\ -~------··-------- : I
Prec~n'\ _ __\.~_~.0-0%! 01 0.00%\ _ -· _J
VotebyMailj 107. 100-.0-0%-,~---0~i 0.00%r--·-· 107
114 100.00%, 01 0.00%!
.. a. ---- ,----- -- __ J_____ I
1' i -
Precincti-·---·,os·.-- ,-ciO.oo-% o-: 0.00%: 105!
__ :___ !
Vote by Mall'. ----,j211QO~Q-0%r-- ·01 -0.00%] 1,521
1 Total! 1,626, 100.00%; o: 0,00%: ·- 1,626!
- --!- ---~----, ~- ---------·---:------- ----~-------
-- -P('e~f;:;ctt---'"--40:-100:00¾' ----0-:-1--0_00%--'-;- ·-- 40,:
i ·---i---------'--' __ I __ ,_ ----·-·-_]
. \l~t~by M~il! - 100.00%: 0\ 0,00%\ 768:
12/112020 1;58:36 PM
Page: 77 of 120
0009252
0009258
0009262
0009264
0009268
0009275
0009282
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mall
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
State Board Of EQU<l!ii.'atiOri #2-,­
Tota!
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote bt M~i!
Total
Cumulative - Total
Board of Equalization {State} -
_ to_ta! _
City
City of Santa Clara
0009001
0009005
0-009051
0009055
0009056
0009059
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mall
110
1,727
1,837
2,146
2,146i
,0009258
1,901:

Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
1,159, 100.00%
1,224 100.00¼
69 . 100.00¼ 130
1,484
1,614
1,901! Vote by Mail: 992 · 100.00%
·~----------
1,901j Total 1,081. 100.00¾
11 1,112;
:0009262
267,
1,999{
-·~-------~; ----
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct.

Vote by Mam
100.00%
148 100.00%
152 100.00%
40 100.00%
1,063 100.00%
1,103 100.00% 1,782, 1,999\ Total' . ________ _,_i ---- 10009266 . ·--- -·----·-----+----------'-
2,037! Precinct' • 49 100.00;;'

0.00%
o, 0.00%
000%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
- -- ----------·-- ---
0 0.00%
- 1,7181 201--i7j-----ccVo_t_e~by-t-,t,~H~, - ------~--·------1,096 100.00% ------ ·>' ----
1,795' 2.037!
\0009275
12a' 2,049'. Precinct 85 100.00%
0,
0 49.286
Precinct
Vote by Mail
-T0-t31-
S8,59J State Board Of Equalization #2,
Precinct
_ ____ _________ Vote by Mail
0 Total
---curTIUlative-Totai
------·-----~---·-----
56,593 Board of Equalization (State} -
__ -------~-- __ Tnt.:,l_ __
______ :-------- City-------·---
City of Santa Clara
0009001 -
. -------------
1,022 100.00%
1,107 100.00%
1 100.00%
5 100:00%.
6 100.00%
33,548- -,oo.00% .
ll,548 100.00%
232
2,406
3,165
3,165
Precinct 146 100.00%
2,636' 3,165;
360
l.635
3,995;
:0009005
4,703'
1 0009051
-----
1,446
1,607
58 59
1,991;
1,991
1,991
0009055
67 67,
2,667 3,1991
:0009059
Vote by Mail;
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mall'
Total:

Precinct;
Tota!
Precinct
-v~te· by M~i1:

Total
-----
TotaL
----------- ... ------
221 2,765' Precinct
-------------·-------
2,001, 2,765: Voto by Maifi , _______ _
1,651 100.00%
1,797 100.00%
2521 100.00%

2.493. 100.00%
2,745. 100,0-0%
107 100.00%
1,047 100.00%
1,154 100.00%
1 100.00%

34. 100.00%
100.00%
14·7- 100.00%
-1,6ia' 100,00¼
140 100,00%
1,426, 100.00%
0 0.00%

0.00%,

0.00%

0.00%

0.00½
0,00%

0.00%
0 0.00%
0 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%;

0.00%

0.00%,

0.00%

0.00%,

0.00%
0 . 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
Total 2,222' 2,765;:_ ______ Total; -· _ __1:5~ -~00_:_~

0.00%
- - 0. . 0.00%
0009061
Precinct
_ Vote by Mail _.

Total
0009062
Precinct
Vota by Mail
- -----------~--]0009061 ------~
Precinct tr-- - 0 - oi --~-----V-o-,,-by--,M-ail~; ---- o'
118
o'
__ \000906~---
2,525;_
Total'
Precinct
Vote by Mail:
65 100.00%
-------- ----
1,425' 100.00%' 0.00%
803
-- 65
1,159
1,224
69 992
1,061
148
152
40 1,063
1,103
49 1,098
1,147
65 1,022
1,107
33,548
33,548
146
1,651
1,797
252

2.493
2,745
107
1,0t.7
1,154
34 35
147

1.678
1,825
140
65 1,425
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page:~77 of 120
Total
0009101
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
C009103
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
00091<14
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
0009109
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009151
Precinct
Vote by Maij
Total
0009157
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009163
Precinct
Vote by Mall
Tota!
0009166
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009201
Precinc.t
Vote by Mail
Total
0009203
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
0009208
Prednc.t
Vote by Mail
Tota!
0009210
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009219
Precinct
Vote by Ma11
Tota!
0009220
Precinct
Vote by Ma:!
Total
0009251
Prec.inct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009252
Precincl
Vote by Mail
Total
0009258
Precinct
2,161
2,626
2,801:
132

2.416
2,548
1?.7

1.502
1,629
171
2,269
2,440
2,7S1
2,965
55 l,212
1,267
72 1,192
1,264
45 720
765
91 1,446
1,537
107
1,159'
1,266
1,906,
176'
188'
157
1,230,
2,387
67 1,151
1,218
110
1,727
1,837
130
Total' 1,490
i
- ---- ,,I __
_____ Precinct: _ ------~~~ .. -~~·~i---_____ o:-~~~~;-=~~=~~~~~ 3,389 Vote by Maili 1,8441 100.(X)'¼,' Oi O.OO¼i 1,8441
3,389; --- r~1a·1! 1,9s-6~·1001X)¼; ---~--OT--oW/4\------,,956:
.~oo_!:~3 _____ -~~=\~--~=--~;-------------1 ' ___ ;

2.986

2.986
1,982
1,982
1,982

2.951
0009109
0009151

2.951;
.0009157
3,619
3,619,
3,619,
1,454
1,454
1,454
0009163
0009166
1,445
1,445
1,445,
0009201 ·
891
891
891
:0009203
1,773
1,773
1,773,
0009208
Prccin~~:---------~-~~i_ 100.0~i Oi 0.00%! 41\
VotebyMail! 541! 100.00%1 0\ 0.00%: 541!
Total: 582i 100.00%; - 01 0.00%] -----se2:
---;------~ ; ---
1 I i I
Precinct,l 84.' 100.00% 01 0.00%) 84-!
Vote by Mail: 1,665 100.00% 0 0.00%:
-----:---·---------! --+----·-,-
1,665'
'
1,749! Total 1,749 100.00% oi 0.00%'
Precinct:

Vote by Mail;
Tota!:

Precir.cti
Vote by Maili
Prec.incti
Vote by MaW
Total'
Vote by Mai!,
Total
Precinct
···--v~t;by-M~-ilj
·p;eci;,ct;­
-\!~le by.Mail!
Tota!1
1-
-- ----- ____ L
----.---------- '
7g·
-··,:035:
1,113'
-----'.--------! ________ .
01 0.00%'. 36' 36j 100.00%
100.0-0%· o: O.OO¾i
833 --,oo.00%·--_____ o:_~_"._00%
8771 100.00% o' O.CO¾'
30_ 100.00%
488 100.00%
44·
833
en
488'
518' 100.00% o -cioo¾:-----~s,a
--- - --------·-------- ____ L ___ _
I i
,a 100.00% - 0:----,iooi;i -
--------------------- __ !
1,029 100.00%
1,077 100.00% o: i
1,029
1,077
.-: _________ --_T-- :---------;
Precinr;tj 66, 100.00%, oi 000%: 66
I __ ----•- ____ : _________ 1 ___ • __ \ _____ ;
t,660; --VOte b~-~~i} ________ ~~-~~~~~00%! oi a.CO%;_~-~--~! 1,660,: --~:~al~-------~~ 1 ~~~~;_____ 0/ 0.C-0%'. 8521 ----~~~~~~ ~- I i i - 7
2,21s; --·- p~;:;tj 69; 100:ooi: 01 O.C-0%\ 691
2,215 · v~te_~-~i~!-------~~2~-~: __ ,_~-~i--- ol O.CO¾: --~~~~J 2 215 Tota\ 1,293, 100.00%: -----··-01 O~C-0%!". 1,293; 000921~-------- I 1
231;
231'.·
Prednc1 1 1; 100.00%1
-···-----~-----+i ___ _ Vote by Mail1
: 107 -:c,oo:::_-:-00%:::_:T!-----,,t--0-.00%--,,f----1-07i 231'
·· 1 ??ti~~o~---

2.a<101
2,840:
2,840
1,343
1,343,
1,343.

2.146
2,146
2,146
1,901
'0009252
'0009258
__ !__ ______ ,
·Totill!" ___ --- 114: 100.0-0¾'. 0 0.00%! 114:
______ I ____________ : ----,-----,----i----__J
___ -~~~! __ ,00.00¾; _ o\ o.OO¾j 1osj
·v;;t~ bY·M~~----- 1,s21: 100.00%· - -01 o.00%\ - - --1,s2,! Total] 1.6-iT--,-O{l.00% o! o.om:,i - -1:626
1 Pre<.inct
i
V~te bY Ma-it:··
TOta(
---~' ' ! i. :

40. 100.00%'. --or 0.00¾/ 40
1 ·16a:· 100.00%; a, o~¾i----~:
808 100.W-/4 -------·o'. -- 0.00%1 ______ aos:
---·------------- '-------:---,,
Precinct; 65 100.00%
1 o; 0.00%; 65
Vote by Mail ·1,159:100.00%
1 oi-·-··0:-00%:

I I I
-··· rotai! -100~00%: a; 0.00%:----~,:2~
____ !-----------~--~~i I ----
Pr~ci~~~I_ 89: 100.00%1 ---~----~l--~~OO%l ____ e~9'
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 77 of 120
0009262
00-09264
00-09268
0009275
00-09282
Vote by Mail
iotal
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Pre<inct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
City of Santa Clara. Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
Total
Cumulative - Total
City-Total
Unlncorpor~~~~ ~rea
Unincorporated
00-09001
Precinct
Vcte by Mail
Total
0009005
Prednct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009051
Precinct
Vote by Malt
Total
0-009055
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009056
Precinct
Vote by Malt
Total
0009059
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
00-09061
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total
00090£2
Pmcinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0-009101
70 1,999
1,712
·--·------·-
40 10-0.0-0%
1,063 100.00%
1,782 1,999 Tota! 1, t03: 100.00%
-- - --------
78 1,718
1,796
2,037' Precinct 49, 100.00%

1.098 100.0-0%
-~-: ___ _ ----·,0-009275 ·-·-- - . --·-··----·-··-i-··-·- ---1-- ----~----------
--------' ,.s~.:l_ _____ 2,049
2,049:!-----
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
85: 100.0-0%
1,022' 10-0.00%.
1,107, 100.00¾
-- ]000_92_8_2 ______________ , ______ _
-----·-··--·-- ... ---------
Ji sl Precinct
sl

8. s·
Vote by Mail
Total

49.286! ___ 5_8,-59_3,,-! ----City of Santa· Clara - Total Cumulative
'.Cumulative
O· Pmcinct
1 10-0.0-0%
s· 100.00%
33,548; 10-0.00%
O' - - ---vcrteby~---~ --

0. 0
- o· · Total ---------·- ·
49,286'.
232
2,406
2,638
360'
3,635
3,995,
1,446
1,607,
Cumulative - Total
58,593' City-Total 33,548: 100.00%
----·- Unlncorpor~ted Area _
' Unincorporated
0-009001 ......
3,165:
3,165:
3,165
,0009005
4,703
4,703,
4,703
1,991
----~0-009055
67 Precinct
- --Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
rotat
Precinct
146 100.00%
1,651 100.00%
1,797 100.00%
252 100.00%
2,493 100.00%
2,745 100.00¼
107 100.00%
1,047 ___ 100.00%
1,154 100.00%
1' 100.00¾
-------'---·----- --···--·····-- -

0.00%: 992

0.00% 1,081
0 1
o.00% - 1-ia
o' 0.00% 1S2

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%

0.00%
40 1,063
1,103
49 1,098
1,147
o, 0.0-0%' 85
I
0 0.0-0%' 1,022
o: 0.00% 1,107
··000%
--ol·· -0~%•
·o,

0. 0
0,
o·
0 0
O.Oif/2

0.0-0%'

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00¾

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%·
33,548
33,548
146
1,651
1,797
252
2,493
2,745
107
1,047

1.154
58 67, Votetr;Mail, 34 100.00"/4 0 0.00%' 34
35 218'
2,449.
2,667,
221
2,001
2,222
67•
!0009056
3,199
.00-09059
2,765
~765
'.0009061
118 2,525;
. ' :
2,043 i 2,525'
------------: ---~-
2,161, z.m:

Total
Prednct
Vote by Mail·
Precinct'
Vote by Mail
Total
'

35. 100.00%'
147; 100.00¾
1,678 100.00%
1,825 100.00%.
140 100.00%
1,426 100.00%
1,566; 100.00%
P-rednct, -- GS; ,roooo/;
Vote by Mail: 1,425: 100.00%'
- T~talt -1,490· 100.00% -
-----1~910_1 ________ _

0.00%

0.00¾

0.00%

0.00¾
0, 0.00%

0.00%:
147
1,678
1,825
140
1,426
1,566
65 1,425

1.490
Precinct 175, 3,389: Precinct! 11( 100.00%, . . o.Oo¾:

0.00%
112
1,844
1,956
0009103
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
2,6~~.;--···---· 3,389: ________ _

2.ao,'. 3,389
1 10009103
Vote byMai!j
Total!
1,844· 10-0.00%
------·------'---- ----~------ '---------------
Precinct 41 100.00%
0 0.0-0% .

0.00%' 41
12/2/2020 1:58:35 PM
Page:·77 of 120
Vote by Mai! 760
Total 824
0009104
Prec.inct 132:

Vote by Mail; 2,416'
Total 2,548'
0009109
Precinct 127i
Vote by Mail 1,s02'.

Total 1,629
0009151
Precinct 171
Vote by Mail 2,269
Total 2.440
C-003157
Precinct 214
Vote by Mai! 2,751
Total 2,965
C-009163
Precinct ss
Vote by Mail 1.212
Tota! 1,267:
0-009166
Precinct 72,
Vote by Mail 1,192
Total 1,264
C-009201
Prec.inc.t 45
Vote by Mail 720
Total 76S
0009203
Precinct 91
Vote by Mail 1,446
Total 1,537
C-00920S
Precinct 107
Vote by Mail 1.159
Total 1,266
C-009210
Precinct 122
Vote by Mail 1.7B4
Total 1,906
0009219
Precinct 12
Vote by Mail. 176
Total- 188
0009220
Precinct' 157
Vote by Mail, 2,230
Total 2,387"
0009251
Precinct 67;
Vote by Mail 1,151:

Total 1,218
00092S2
Precinct 110
Vote by Mail 1,727
Total 1,837
0009258
Precinct 130
Vote by Mail 1,484
Total 1,614
0009262
Precinct 11'
Vote by Mail 214
Total 225
OO(J-3264
541
,0-009104
~986
-v~~~-by-M~ii\ _~------~ -~~-~:- o: o.oo¼!
Total, saz 100.00¾: o: o.00%! sai:
:-----c,---'-----'!---'------''
Precinct! 84: 100.003/<
Z986;
2,986'.
-~~~~~~~-j~~:~------1~665f-100:£Xmr -··er O.OO¾j 1,665! Tola!!' 1,749,,,· 100.00%[1 0i · 0.00%1 1749
I ' I
:0009109 ____________ J ________ : ____ !____ ! I !
1,982: Precinct! 78 1 100.00%' oj 0.00%! 78'
,,;;,,,i,yr.i;;ii: . i,oisl,oo:cio%: ------0: 000'/4: --,:035; 1,982 1,982
2,951
2951
3,619
l619
3,619
1,4$4
1,454
1,454_
0009151
0009157
0009163
,0-009166
1,445
1 1,445:"
1,445
891
891
891
1,773
1,773
1,773
t,660
1,660
1,660
2215
z.21s;
~21S
0-009201
:coonoi
0009208
0003210
:CW9219
231
Tota!
1 I 1.113: 100.00%1 o! 0.00%!
i I
1,113
--~-------- - : ______ __i -------i _____ _
Precinct: 111: 100.00%: oi 0.00%: 111
Vote by Mail; 1,54z;- 1-0{l~QO¾! O' 0.00%'
I , _ _J ---- ·rat31_: ________ 1/4S3: 100.W'h' 0: 000%' ' ' . ! 1,653
' :
. ---L
Precinct[
Vote by Mail.

Totali
'
136 100.00%
1,911 100.00%
44, 100.00%:
vi:rt;biMaif---- ·- -s33t 100.00%:

Total
'
877: 100.00%
-- - - - - ---- -- - - --
30 100.00%

0.00%
o, 0.00%
QI
i
o;

0.00%:

0.00%·
'
136,
1,911
877
P,e-cinct;
V~t~ by M~ili
Tota!,
488 100.00%, ---·-··- o: -· 0.00%' --- -·- -488:
5l8 --~o~~~ --·--·· o; o.00%
1 • • 518
Precinct'.
_ .. __ Vat; by ·i;1~ii;-· -
T~1a1i
Precinct
Vote by Maili
Tota1j·
Precin<t'
48 100.C-0%
-· .. 1,029. 100,Q()% I
1,077: 100.00%,
€6 100.00%
726 100.00%
852 100.00%
---i ' - I
48 o, ·· O:cio%,-- -- io2i;
01 0.00%
o,
-- ---- Cl!

0.00%,
000%'
1,077
66 786
-----,-----
Qi 0.00'}~: 852i
-·---- . j'---------
01 - 0.00¾; ____ -6i
!
Vote b}1 Ma-i( 1,224' 100.00'/4; Cl~ 0.00%; --,j2\
To~/~-· __ 1,29~: 100.0Cf/4
1 -l~~~~~-- _'·~
Precinct; 7 100.00%i - Qi ·o.oo%i --·-- 7\
231 ____________ :~~;-~~!~1-~--101r 100.00¼;-- -- of o.oo%j 107! 231: --- ~~~11 114i 100.00%! or 0.00%: rn;
'COQ9220 ·---~------J---~ !-------------1---i-------~-i za40: Pre~incti 105j- ~~~~i _ -~j --~·~:) 10s;
Z840] VotebyMaiii 1,5211 100.00%: al o.OO¾i ---·-1.si,-) _ I , I ] ___ !
------·-·-----~~~'.f,~~~=~~~1=~~°1-- oil 0.00%
1 1,Gzoi
;0009251 i
1,343 ·Pfeo~~i 4oi 100.00%: _oj 0.00%' 40'
1,343
1,343

2.146
2146
~146
1,901
1,901,
1,901
0-009262
261,
10009254.

Vote by Mail: 768 100.00%, o'. - '"o.00%: 7681
. -----r--rotai,
I
Preciru:t'.-­
i
Vote by Mai1i
Total:

I
i
PreCi~cti
· 808 100.00%: -- o': 0.00%: aoa: I . ---,-----+------'----- 1,224 100.00% O.OCf/4'
6S
1,159
I
1,224;
89,
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 77 of 120
0009268
0009275
0009282
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Unincorporated - Total
Cumulative
--------,----
70 1,999' Precinct' 40 100.00¼ 0.00%
--, -~--~-:-

1.712 1,999/ Vore by Mail 1,063 100.0W/4
--··--·-·· --,-------------~--··--·-···· ·····
1,103! 100.00% o: 0.00%: Total 1,782 1,999
1 120:
1,542
49,2861
:0009268
~037:

2.037: Vote by Mail
49; 100.00%
1,098 100.00%
--------------; --------------- -------·-1, 147 100.00%, Total 10009275
2,0-19
Precinct
Vote by Mail
85 100.00%
1,022 100.00%
l, 107. 100.00%:
---------- ---------·
S 100.00%
6 100.00o/~
-- ,----·---------·-- --------
33,548' 100.00% 58,593; unincorporated - Total

0.00%,

0.00%

0.00%
o· 0.00%
0 -- 0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%,

0.00%,

0.00%

0.00%·
Cumulative
Cumulative
;cumulative
----p;cin~t--·----o~' ____ O_;_,===- Precinct
yotebyMail ____ _
Total
Cumulative - Total
Unincorporated Area - Total
0:-i ____ 0:-i ______ v_o_te by Mail
o: 01 Total:
......... ·----··-·--------'----
------..?..! 0/ Cumulative-Total'. ______________ _
49,286: 58,S93\ Unincorporated Area· Totat; 33,548' 100.00% o: o.00%:
________________ ! ___ ~-- ----- ----------------
40 1,063
1,103
1,098
1,147
8S
1,022
1,107
33,548
33,548
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
PJge: 78 of l20
City of Santa Clara, Chief of Police(Y<>te for ~)_
J li o;,~,t -~ f ·-··---------i-~---· - ---- li
District
Co~~~y.v~~-e
Electionwfde
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Elec.tionwide - Total
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Cumulative - Total'
Countywide - Total'
Congressional District
- -
17th Congressional District
Precinct
Vote by Mail
171h Congressional District -
Tota!
Cumulative
Ptednct
Vote ht Mail
Cumulative - Total_
Congressional District - Total
State Senator
10th Senatorial District
Precinct
Vote by Mail
10th Senatorial o:strict - Total
Cumulative
Prednct"
::'~!:~y_~a~I-
Cumulative - Total
State Senator - Total
Membef-of the St'.iie
Assembly
25th Assembly District
Precinct
Vote by Mail
25th Assembly District - Total
Cumulative
Precinct
. vo:e by Mail
Cumulative - Tota!
ifomher of the-state As5eri1bl}' ·.

Total
Board of Equalization (State)
State Boi,iid Of Equaliiation
.,
Precinct
Vote by Mail
State 06ard Of (qlJaliZitlOn #i. ,-
Cumulative
Precinct
Y3~~-~? :"1aa
Cumulative - Total
Board Of tquiliiation· (Sla(ej ·•
Tota!
City
C~ty of San_ta Clara
Precinct
Vote by Mail
City of Santa Clara - Tota!'
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Cumulative - Total
City-Total
3,4S2·
45,834;
49,286'
o_
o' o·
49,286:
3,452
45,834
49,286
49,2861
l,452
45,834,
49,286.
o·
49,286

3.452
45,834
49,286
49,286
3,452
45,834
49,286,
-·o:
o·
o;
49,286
3,452:
45,834'.
0 0
49,286
~ Countywide j -------:- ---- -! ------- 3 ··r-~----~------J-: ; -- i - I ·,1 -- ---t-- -~-1,
--!--.. Elect!~~~ ______ -~~-~--~' -~'-----'---i--1------! 58,593; Precinct\ ~--2·~~! ~~·~l- 01 O.CO%j 2,,461
58,593! Vole by Mai!, 31,534; 100.00%: ·-or O.CO%i 31,"'s341 1 ----'----' -~---+--+-----
o: o; o· --
58,593
Electio~~~~: ~:-~~; ·--~J~~o ~-~~; oi 0.00%\ 33,880/
~~~~~~~----l !
Countywide - Total: 33,sso! 100.00%; o;
58,593
58,593
58,593
_ Congressional District
17th Congressional District
Precinct;
---------·-·-·----1--
····----·~------- ---' --------------.
__ ! ------------
0; 0.00%1 2,346'
o.
0 58,S93_
58,5931
58,593'
58,5931
58,593
58,593
58,593

58.593
o·
58,593
Vote by-Mail; -- 31,534, ·100.00¾· -----Qi 0.00%:
17th Congres;io~;-1 District -i 33,880: 100.00%: -------o:-·-o:ow/4f __ _ 33,880:

Tl'\t:atf
Cumulative .! .. _ _L '----·-- ----- ·-
Precinct, . 0: Oj
Vote by Mail: O! - o] Oj
____ ··-Cu~~1a~~:~~~Oif~L__ o· - o' · -- -·-0
1 Congressional District -Total! -·-·"ii.88Qf100.00%'. _________ o:·-- 0.00%;--- 33,880:
~~a_t_!_~!~~~~-------.~-~--- ' - ·-1-- ; I
10th Senatorial District --- .. --- ____ ,__. ------ ------~ ------------ a346: 100.00% Oi 0.00%'
! !
- - v-ote-bYi1ail'. 31,534; 100.00%
1 ol -o~OO¾j
2,346!
I
31,534:
--·· ~ i
10th Senatorial District~ Total: 33,880; 100.00% - -01- 0.00"/4; ~:~~~;, Cumulative !'ii~[ ~~==F=~-~-=---=J~--r~-- 0,
Vote by Ma) o, -· i o· -- i o'.
-cu mutative- T~tai: . O; -- . ·-- ·o;--------:·----------o:
. St;te S~nato;-: Totali 33,880: 100.00%' 01 0.00%) 33,880' Mein bet Or the· State ..

Assemblv. __

2.sth Assemb_l¥ Dis_tr~~.--
Ptednct 2,346 100.00%' aJ•G
I
Vote by Mai!: -- -3;j34--,oo.00% ··- o' · 0.00%: ----3,:534 25th Ass~~b:y-Oirtrict= rot;i-: ______ 3iaao ~-,oo.oo?/ o: -·-o.00o/:--~33.5eo Cumulative
Precinct·
Vote by Mail
I state BOili-d{)f equauzatfon ! -
_/1.2 '
58,593 ·pr~~i~r- 2,346 ··100.00%·----- i ---ii0~/4:~----2.346, 58,593; Vote by Mall; - -31:s3-1' 100.00%'. ·-01 -- ··000%\-- 31,534 __ . ___ .i ___ ---~---· -~----- ! . l
5B,~9~' St~~ 8~~~d ~~~~~~~;~!J_ ~3,880~~~-00% ___ ~=0/ 0.00%! - 33,880; \ Cumulati~~·--------_l-, __ --~--.I .. _ j ____ _I_ _ I i o'. __ P~~n~i ________ __Di__ oj j o;
0 _ Vote by Ma~:___ 0\ Oi i Oi
-_o e~;,a~frq~~::;;::i;:~>- 33,ss~!-,ooooJ---~~-~! --+----1 58,593 -----------· ____ Tn»I' _ I , I 0.00%1 33,880:
- -~!~~ - . ' .

Cltyo~SantaClara I ------!------------1
ss.s.9_3_: ___ -------··----~:~cinct~-- 2,346'. 100.00%: oi ____ ~.00%! --~ S8,593\ Vote by Mail 31,534: 100.00%; ~~[! ____ 0.00%'._, ____ }~•534! 58,593: City of Santa Cl~~a ~ Tota!' 33,880'. 100.00%i 01 0.00%i 33,880, · ·::;2;f ··· :'~C~J~i~]
58,593 - --- ---- ----- ·c;ty - Total ... 33,880: 100.00% 0 0.00%\ - - 33:iao! _____ L ___ _
12/2/2020 7:28:39 PM
P.3ge: 78 of ·120
City of Santa Clara, Chief of Police(\Tot~ for 1)
Precinct
Countywi~e
Elettionwide
0009001
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009005
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009051
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009055
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total
0009056
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009059
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009061
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009062
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009101
Prednct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009103
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
0009104
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009109
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
0009151
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
00091S7
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009163
P(ecinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009166
Pre<intl
232
2,406
2,638.
360
3,63:i
3,995
161
1,446
1,607
58 59
218
2,449
2,667
221
2,001
2,222
118
2,043
2,161
175
2,801
64 760
82,:
132

2.416
2,548
127
1,s02·
1,629
171
2,269
2,440
214
2,751

2.965
55 1,212
1,267
72 ~
e
,i§
t!-. g. P_redoct __
__ Countywid_e
Electionwide
i0009001 .. _T=:::------._-_-_· ----
3,165
3,16S
3,165
:0009005
4,703'
4,703
4,703
1,991
1,991
1,991
3,199
3,199
3,199
~765
2,765
2,765
2,525
2,525•
2,525
0009051.
10009055
0009056
0009-059
0009062
;0009101
3,389.
,-
3,389
l,389
Precinct\ 166: 100.00%! o; 0,00%!
- -· ··----'-------·I·--·~'
V~t~bY M~i1] 1,G1e; 100.00% o; o.00%;
.... ---·----1 _________ ! _____ _
Total

1.8_4~: _ ~~~%: ·-·-------+--~.00¾;. ____ 1,8421
!
Precind1.
- ----·--------· _______ i _____ _
265 100.00% o; o.00%:
------·-' -----------'----~ Vote by Maili 2,5011 100.00%,: o; o.00",( Precinct
2,766 100.00% i76s·
---------)-~---·i----+-- .. ·--,
______ ;_ ----- - . -- I ,
0'
121: 100.00%, o; -- o:OO¾! 121:
.. , I
01 ---o~w/4: Vote bY-~i~i( - - 1:067; ,oo.00%· ---­
L -· -· --To1a1j 1,1aa 100.00%; --·-·o;·· 0.00¾; 1,1aa; -- ________________ j __ ---- ,
. ! .L l
Precinct - - · 1: 100.00%!1 0/ 0.00'¾:
-·v~te by.Mali!. · 33: 100.00¼: - oJ OJ)!J¾~ 33!
-- ·--:---------- _ ___J _____ -~-f--~:·--- -------
Total; 34; 100.00%: o1 0.00%1 34
Precinct!
·'· Vote by Mai!]
-,-so.-·,00.000;{
1,662 100.00%-
·-----;-- -----------
1,812 100.00%:
137 100.00"~
.. ··o:· o.oo·i/-- ------ 150
!
01- o:o°": 1.662
o: 0.00%] 1,812,
- ; --------
Precincti
Voteby-M~i!;--- ------------'---
1,411 100.00% 0
1 0.00%, 1,411
1,548 Totall
PreCintl!­
-·voteby M"ai- --
Total
··1
Pre~Jn~t1·
-- -- V~t~ b)' iAail: -
-T~t~I~
1,548 100.00%,
1,4s1, ,oo~:
1,526, 100.00%!
: ' ·--r------.-------
- - Pr8~i0<t:

Vo-te-by M-3ilj
115, 100.00%:
-,,832. 100.00%:
0 0.00%'
! --i--
·- '" ___ :
o:
o: . 0
- 0---·- ' -·-
o: O.OO¾j
Totall - 1,947\ 100.00%·- -- oi o.oo%i - -,,947'.
iiJ-009103 -- -_ -~ _1----'--.- __ -_-_,-,,_--,---+1----'1'---- ! 995( Precinct; ·41;· 100.00%: oi 0.00%\---·411
- -\/01~-by-Mail: 534 100.00%(- - -ot--0.00¾f ____ ---53·41 o· rOti 51s:, ·100.00%; -
··----------- ·---!·------:0009104
995,
2,986:
,-
2,986:
~986:
;0009109
1,982
·,
1,982
1,982

2.951
2,951

2.951
3,619
3,619·
0009157
:0009163

1.454
1,454,
1,454,
--·:0009166
1,445:

Precinct 87/ 100.00¾i --------·- 01 __ ~~~
Vo-t-;by Mail, 1,668: 100.00%i 01 o.o0%i -
Total t,755- ,oo-.00%-'-
1 , ----'--o.-00%---'-. --
011
I
-----------~------ I----
Precinct, ~5: 1~.00%, 0j 0.00%i
. Voteby-~.tait"" . --- 1,042" 100.00%\ o; - 0.00%;·-
Precinct;
vote by Mail
·rota,:
!, __ ,
123 100.00%

1.535 1000:)%
1,658 100.00¾,
0,00%:

Oi 0.00%' -
o; 0.00%:
1,668'
1,75s!
as·

1.oi2:
123,
1,535
1,6S8
-··--------~- ___ . _________ i _____ I ------~I
Precinct 144! 100.00%' O: 0.00%: 144;
1,906 100.00%; o! o.00%' 1,906:
' ' ----~- --- --- ---·---------
Tota1; ___ ~s~~~~~i ____ O\ o.oo%i · 2,050:

Precinct
I
Vote by Mai!: -
·-·-·L Totafi
3at ,00.00%1 -- ~--- o~ ooo%r--
' : 832 --,oo.003/;,-- - o:---a.DO%'
--- ________ I------- --'---·-----------L ___ _
a10 100.00%! oi 0.00%
1 I '
ii
832
870
-~1- - . ·--- !----:-------
- Pr~inct' so. 100.00%, --~ 0.00%' SQ
'.__ - __ ;__
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 78 of 120
--- ---- --- -
Vote by Mail Vote by Mail,
Total 1,264 1,445' Total
833 100.00%
883 · ·1·00.00%
····-··-- ----------·--'---------
0009201
0009203
0009208
0009210
0009219
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Pretinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
10009201
I I
45'. 891; Precinct
Vote by Mair'
34' 100.00% I
720 891'
-------------: ----~--- ------- 1 ___ _
495· 100.00%
529 100.0lf/4 755'
91 1,446
1,537 1,773'
107
:0009208
1,660,
2,215

1.784, 2,215
Total
I
55 100.00%
- -·- -------
Vote by Mail 1,021 100.00%
Precinct-
--V~t~ by Mail.

Total
65, 100.00%
776 100.00% -
841. 100.00%
81 100.00%
1,231 100.00%
1,312 100.00%
--- ---- -------- ----
;0009219
231:
231!
188 231:

Precinct
Vote by Mail,
Total:
100.00%
113' 100.00'"/4
119: 100.00%
--·•··----: ----------'-·----------'----
0009220
0009251
0009252
0009258
0009262
0009264
0009268
0009275
0009282
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Prednct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tola!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Electionwide - Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Cumulative. Tota!
Countywide • Total
Congressional District
17th Congressional District
0009001
.0009220
m' 2,840; Precinct, 109, 100.004/4
-~------
2,230 '. 2,840" Vote by Mail I
------1-- --- -------- -~---
1,478 100.00%
2,3_s_~------ - 2,840; __________ ~ota11 ___ _
1,587 100.00%
!
Precinct
,0009251
-----·--·------.~-------
1,343: 67
1,151'
1,218
110
1,727
1,837
1,343: Vote by M:1il
1,343 Total
Total
46' 100.00%
782 100.00C/2
828 10<,:~,i-
1,182. 100.00%
1,255 100.00%.
------~---
130
1,484
1,614
11 214
225
70 1,782
1,796
128
1,542!
1,670
49,286
1,901·
1,901
0009258
Precinct
Vote by Mail

93. 100.00%
... ·,:04_1 _ 100.00%
--•-- --- ------ --- .
1,901 Total 1,134 100.00%
267
267
267
0009262
Vote by Mail
Total
a 100.00%
150 100,0-0%.
158 100.0C¾
0009264 -
1,999
1,999.

Prednct -40 100.0if/4
---·-------- ·--· Vote by Mail' 1,089 100.00%
-·--------- ·-------- ------ ' -----
1,999' Total 1,129 100.00%
2,037
2,049
58,593
0009275
0009282
Precinct:

Vote by Mail'
Total
Precinct
VotebY-Mail
100.00%
100.00%
87 100.00%
1,059 100.00%
1,146, 100.00%
1 100.00%
s, 100.00%
6 100.00%
E!ectionwide-Total 33,880 100.00%'
Cumulative
o, ------ ·----- -----
____ v_o_te ~ Mail: o:

Total' O
O' o: ·c~~~lative ~ Total - - o --------'--------------- 49,286 58,593: Countywide - Total 33.seo 100.00%
O·

0.CO%
o.c-0%­
o.OO¾
0, 0.00%
o_ o.co¾

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
· o' · o.00¾
o'

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%,

0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%
o. 0.00%

0.00%

0. 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
0 000%

0.00%

0.00%
0,00¼

0.0.'.)%
000%

0.00%

0.00%1
o, 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
o. o.oo¾

0.00%
0,00%
833
883
34 495
529
55 1.021
1,076
65 776
841
81 1,231
1,312
113
119
109
1,478
1,587
46 782
828
73 1,182

1.255
93 1.041
1,134
150
158
40 1,089
1,129
56 1,123
1,179
87 1,059
1,146
0 0
33,880
12/2/2020 lc58:36 PM
Page: 78 of'120
P,ednct 232
Vote by Mail 2,406
Total 2,638
0009005
' Precinct 360
Vote by Mail 3,635
Totill 3,995
OC09051
Precinct 161
Vote by Mai! 1.446
Total 1,607
0009055
Precinct
Vote by Mail 58
Total 59
0009056
Precinct 218
Vote by Mai! 2,449
Total 2,667
0009059
Precinct 221
Vote by Ma:t 2.00,:

Tota! 2,222
0009061
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009062
Precinct 118
Vote by Mail 2,043
Total 2,161
0009101
Precinct 175
Vote by Mail 2,626
Total 2,801
0009103
Precinct 64
Vote by Mail 760
Total 824!
0009104
Precinct 132
Vote by Mail 2.,4161
Total 2,$48
0009109
Precinct m
Vote by Mail 1,502
Total 1,629,
0009151
Precinct 171
Vote by Ma!! 2,269
Total 2.440
0009157
Precinct 214
Vote by Mail 2,751,
Total 2,965
0009163
Pre<.incl 55
Vote by Mail 1,212
Total 1,267
OJ09166
Precinct 72
Vote by Mail 1,192
Tota\ 1,264
0009201
Precinct 45
Vote by Mail 720
Total 765
0009203
3,165:
3,165; ·-
3,165\
i0009005
4,703;
4,703;
,-
4,703
;0009051
1,991
1,991,
1,991
67:
67 67,
0009055
,0009056
3,199
3,199
3,199·
-;oiiosos9
2,765.
2,76;:
2,765'
. '0005061
0 '0009062
2,525
2,525'

2.525,
;OQ09101

3.389
3,389
3,389
995
995
0009103
995;
'.0009104
2,986;
Vote by Mail:

I
. 166: 100.00¼ 166i
1,616,1 100.00%-----'o! --000%-.,--------6-6-. I ,, 7 i ___ _j
Tota!: 1,842; 100.00"J/ oi 000%( 1,842:

L --------- , ---
- i ----,. I - -!
Precinct! ---26\ 100.00i( oi o.00%1 -mi
Vote by Maili 2,501 ( 100.00% o:' o.00¾; 2,so1:
·-·--·-• .1 - . ----~--·---· ----;.----
Tota!j
I j '
o~\ · 2,766:
--:-
-·v~te·by M~tt:· -
___ l_ __
Total'
Vote by Mail.!
2,766: 100.om~:
1,067 100.00%
-----------' -
1,188 100.00%
1 o: 0.00% 1,188
---~-------· __________ i --
100.00%
- -·--·------ ---
33: 100.00%, o; 0.00%' 33:
\ ____ !
~'~:~------~4;_~~~: -·- -~-~!-~~: __ -- 34j
Precinct/ . 150_; 100~00%~- o
1 ! 0.00%
1 : - ·150;
V~te -by M;;ri -- 1.662; 100.00%: 0
1 0.00%j 1,~
Total, l,812: 10Q.00%'. -____ o_
1 _ 000%; --~~~!
Precinct! 137, 100.00% ··---QI-- 000%1-- -- -137i
·--· --··- I ! l Vote by Mail: 1,411!-1-coo:-.00=%c-'. ----oc":--o.-00'½-,--:-,---1,-41---;1:

Total; 1,5481 100.00%: O[ 0.00%'
--.--t-----
Vote by Mail1: .

Tot~li--
· v·~te·byMaii;··
Total:-·
Precinct!
Vote by Mail;
---a:---~ ~ - ~ ~o,
. ·--· ·-r--
-· ----~----··-
69 100.00%'. 0.00%' 69
i '
1,4s1. ·,-OOJJO¾: o' 0.00% --~Wl
' I :
t,526 -,0000%··- o· ·--o.00%1--·-·-··-,.s26
11s· 100.00½:
1,832 100.00%
:
o O.oow
I
o' i

0.00%:
-------~-----
1,832
Total: 1,947 100.00% O; 0.00% 1,947
i ·-·------- ;------•-•:-----'
· Pre~inct~· 41 -,oo.00%~ o'. 0.00%! 41: ____ , ____ i __________ , ______ ._ ____ [__ I Vote by Mail; 53{ 100.00% o
1 0.00%' --s341
Totali
--~------l
Precinct/
I
575'. 100.00% oi 0.00%
i 0) ---000%[
575'
87/
- ,
2,9~~ ....... '" ___ -----~ote by Mail; 1,668i 100.00% o: 0.00%i -,.6681
2,986: ~o~~------,..1,75S; 100.00%: O! 0.00%: 1,7551
1,98x:
9 ~=---------::':ct ·--~~:~~~~%: -~- 0;--0.00%[-----=~
1,9a~! _ -~~~-~~-~~~-- ____ ,~.00%\ o; o.00%] 1,042;
1,982, Total 1,127i 100.00%; o\ 0.00%:
!0009151
2,951
0009157-
3,619

3.619
3,619
0009163
1,454
1,454
1,45<1
'0009166
1,445,
1,445'
1,445:
-[?009201 ·-
8910
891,!
891
,, 10009203- ·-
. _ ---·----· ____________ i I
-------~~~- 123i 100.w1o; o\ - 0.00%1 1231
Veta by Mail 1,535'. 100.00%: oi O.(Xl%; 1,5351
Toiai ____ ~,~~: 1()0:oo_" _~=-~---f ~~:--·-1,658:
' 144: 100.00%: - -Qi 0.00%j -- 144i
______________ 1 ___ ··--·---~-·
1,906 100.00¾'. o: Vote by Mail; 0.00%: 1,906;
2,oso. 100.00% oi o.00%; · 2,oso:
- -------- -- ! -, -----·
Pr~~t;~t! 38· 100.00%' o: 0.00%'. 38.

Vote by Mail,;--------832; -100.00%,'. -- oj · 0.00%' 832 - ----~-I ------ . ______ I---------·
a10 100.00% o; o.oo%j a10:
.J ____ :

O! 0.00%;
Total:
__ j___
50 100.00%/ so
I
o; o.00%
I •
Vote by Mail! 833 100.00%_ 833
Tot~\.__ 883 100.00¾; ---or 0.00%_ - 883-,
. ·:--·· -·r--~---~:I_ -----------------1
-P·;~i;·,tf--.. ----34---100.~/4f- 0\ 0.OOW - 34'.

Vote by Maii'. · 495 1001>0%~--- a:- o.~:--~--- 495:

I
529
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 78 of 120
0009208
0009210
0009219
0009220
0009251
0009252
0009258
0009262
0C-09264
OC09268
0009275
0009282
Precinct
Vote by Mal!
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Predna
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mall
Total
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
17th Cong,e-sSiOn-al-DiS!riCC-".

Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Cumulative - Total
Congressional District• Total
State Senator
10th Senatorial District
C009001
0009005
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mall
Total
1,446
1,537
1,773
1,173'
_ ---- \0009208
107 1,660i
1,159 1,660
1,266' 1,660,
,0009210
2,215
Precinct!
Vote by Mail I
I
S5 100.00%
1,021 100.00%
To-t;i-
1 ____ --1~16·--,00~00%-
Prednct
1 i
65 100.00%
Vote by Mail; 776: 100.00%
841· 100.00%
81' 100.00%
1,784: 2,215, Vote by Mail: 1,231 100.00%
----:---------.J _______ _
Total --"t.:12_-,oo.00% -- · 1,906. 2,21s:
12 176
188
157
2,230
231
231:
2lf
2,840,
0009220
i ----·---------
Precinct
-·-··--Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
6_ 100.00%'
113 1·00:00%
119 100.00%
109 100.00%
1,478: 100.0-0%
2,387 2,840 Total 1,587. 100.00%
.. :0009251··-·--- .. -•·· ....
67: 1,343' Precinct
1,151 1,343; Vote by Mail:
1,218 1,343' Total! 828 100.00%
Precinct: 73 100.00%,
1,727 2,146' Vote by Mail: 1,182. 100.00%
1,837,,----2-,14_6c._; ___ _ Total; 1,255; 100.00%
_ J_0009_25_8 --
1,901 ! Precinct:
7"------
1,48-4, 1,901! Vote by Mail:
_______ , ------~-~--------c--
1,614 1,901\ Total'.
,0009262
Precinct:

Vote by Mail
93 100.00%
1,041 100.00%
1,134, 100.00%
100.00%
150 100.00%
11 214
225 267 - Tot~L 158 100.W/4
70 1,712
1,782
78 1,718
1,796
128
1,670'
_0009264 - .
1,999
1,959
Predr,ct,
--------~--------·--
1,999:
2,037
2,037

2.037
0009268
'0009275
Tota!
P~~dnct: ·
--Vote by Ma(_
Total:
-- -----~------ Precin~t 2,049

2.049'
i0009282
5,
Total,
Precinct!
Vote by Mai\i
-----~-~----- _____________ _,c: __ _
8,
49,286
5_
58,593;
Total:
17th Congressional District -i
___ Tr,hl'._
Cumulative !
Cumulative
40 100.00%
1,089 106:00%
1,129 100.00%
561 100.00%
1,123 - 100.00%""
1,179 100.00"/4
87 100.00%
,,059' -,00~00%
1,146. 100.00%
1 100.00"/2
S 100.003/~
33,880 100.00%
-----------------------Precinct! 0
Vote by Mail:

Total
Cumulative - Tota!i
~-·-- ----~·--· ~------ --------
49,286 58,593 Congressional District -Total 33,880 100,00¾ State Senator
3,165, Vote by Mail! ___________ i __ _
166' 100.00¾
--1in; 100.00%
1,842 100.00%
3,635'
3,995'.
'C009005
4,703,

4.703:
-------------
Total!
:

Precinct:

Tota!1
--·---------- -----
265 100.00%'
2,766 100.00%

0.00'%
o, 0.00%
o· 0.00%

0.00%'
((" 0.00%'

0.00%
0 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%'

0.00%
·,io0% ·
0 0.00%

0.00%
() . 0.00%
o: 0.C-o-½;
0, 0,C0%1
-·1
0, 0.1:0%

0. 0.00%:
0 0.00%
o, 0.00%
0 0.00%
0 O.CO%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
O' 0.00%
-·-o,-· o.oo¾

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%
0' 000%

0.00%.

0.00%

0.00¾

0.00%

0.00%

0.OC¾

0.00%

0.00%
55 1,021
1,076
65 776
841
81 1,231
1,312
113
119
109
1,478
1,587
46 782
828
73 1,182
1,255
93 1,041
1,134
150
158
40 1,089
1,129
56 1.123
1,179
87 1,059
1,146
33,880
166
1,676
1,842
265

2.501
2,766
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 78 of120
0009051
OC-09055
0009056
0009059
0009061
00090£2
0009101
0009103
OOC9104
0009109
0009151
0009157
0009163
0009166
0009201
0009203
0009208
0009210
Precinct
Vote by Man
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precim:.t
Vote by Mall
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
1,446
1,607
59 218
2,449
i667
221
2,001
2,222
118

2.043

2.161
175
2,626

2.801
64 760
824
132
2,416
2,S48
127,
1,502
1,629'
214

2.751
2,965:
55 1,212
1,267
72 1,192
1,264

45. 720
765
91 1.446
1,537
107
1,159
1,266
0009051
- :
1,991:
1,9~\_
1,991;
P;ednct: · 121 l 100.00%' - of·-· o.c-O'f ·-121!
voie by Maui ·~----:~~~~-~~00%:_ -----~/--~~~] 1,06711
Total; 1,188: 100.00%; Oi 0.00%! 1,188
10009055 - - i--~·t--- -----~_.)
67 67
67 l,199
3,199
3,199
0009056
0009059
2,765:
2,765
2,765·
0009001
o.
o.
;00090£2
~525'
2,525
3,389
3,389
3,389
995
995
995
0009101
0009103
,0009104
2,986
~986,
i986
1,982
1,982'.
,, ····--·'
Precinct\ ·-1r100.w/4;- o! ·o.OO¼i
33 100.00%' -----o:o.00%r---------33:

Total
!
:

P,e-cil1Ct;
34 100.00%,
150 100.00%
Vote by Maili
Total:
-- -------- -------,,----,-,--_--:--------.
1,6621 100,00%
1,812 100.00% -·-··
0,00%i
Vote by ~ll- -----,.411 100.00%: o\ 0.00%:
-T~t~·1j · 1,548: 100.00%:- ··o:-- 0.00%\
I !
i I
P~e~in·ct: -- - 0 ---- . -------~o!
·vote ~y-~1.a.11L ---- ,----o..;'. __ ~.
1,411
1,548
Totali -· --o;· - ~l.
__ L__ ___I __ :_-~1-=-:_~=~~-'
Precinctl 69 · 100:00i?_______ o'
---------------- I
1,457~ 100.00¼; ··-

0.00%! 69,
Vote by Mail(
.... -.,
Totali
Precinct;
Vote by Mail:

I
-·--r~t~·1: ·
Precinct'
v~-te ·by M~{
Total'
Precinct,
Total:
o: 0.00%'
·,,526! 100~00%--------·--o'- o.oo''/4.!
! I
-- ------- ·r- --~---
11s: 100.00%. 0, O.W'/4 115.
1,832; 100.00%,
1,947; 100.00%
O' 0.00%; 1,832
., o: 0.00"/4 1,947
41, 100.00% 41
·s-34:-100.<W/4,--·-------o~ o.w/2_: ---53-4;
87 . 100.00%~ o: --0.00%:
1,668, 100.00½!
1,755 'ioo.oo-1s! 0.00%
I .. ···----- ------ - -----:--·- ----,--·
575
1,755\
' ------------ ___ I - - Precinct. as---100.00%,;- 01 o.00"'/4' ss1 - Vote by Mail: ------ 1,042' 100.00%' 0:- ----· ------ :
·---!---- --- ---- : -------j-i ----+1 __ 0._00_%+i ___ 1._04_J2i t,982i Total: 1,127, 100.00%1 O! O.OO%j 1,127i
· rooos\51"'·· -----r-·----~~~
1 ·.-----1
1 2~;;~j Precinct: 123i 100.00%; Oi 0.00%1 123:
---;,~~-------~--vote-b,-y--,M"',"'n,'---1--,,5"'35+, -1-oo-.00%-- 1 ----~o!--o.-00%-~_;_!__ -1~3j:
2:~~1/ Tot.11' 1,655 100.00%! 01 0.00%! ---1,658;
!0009157 :.-:~-~~:=:-: __ ' . ----+i ----tj---_-_-_--ii 3,619· Precinct 144; 100.00¼j 01 0.00%: 144!
VotebyMail, 1,906 100.00%' 0 1 0.00%/ 1.906,:
--- --------------'-------- ___ I ____ _I
Total 2,0501 100.0IY'/2i o: o.00%!
!0009163
1,454':
1,454'.
1,454
. ;0009166
1,445
1,445
1,445,
891
891
891'.
1,773
1,773
·,
1,773:
0009201
,0009208
1,660
1,660:
1,660
.0009210
. -··· :-·------:------·---:----·--~·
I I
oi 0.00%(
Oi 0.00%' 832'
Total
832' 100.00%:
·--"Efrl 100.00~----·o: o.00%~ 870:

Precinct
Totai/­
'
so; 100.00%,
833, 100.00%' ·-
883 :· 100.00%:
__ i --·----
0 0.00%' 50
- o\ 0.00%!
I
---·o! 0.00%!
______ I__ -------- i I .

Precinct! 34. 100.00¾_ · O! 0.00%) 341
---·--·-VotebyMailj-----•-·495' -,-OOm¾;- Qi 0.00%1 495' ··----------~--' ______ I ___ ! ______ . ____ ··-·--~-• Tota\ 529 100.00%. o: 0.00%;
·-··-r Ii j
55: 100.00%: oi 0.00%\ -
Vote by Maili
- ____ ! __ _
1,021; ioo.oo¾·- o~0.00%
I . !
Total; 1,076' 100.00%! 01
I
55;
1,021:
1,076
-- !---~- ----~: __ -:=·=~==~=-== Precinct! 65 100.00¾' o 1 0.00%: 65 ·-v_o~e~by~~:S:~ ·:_~_.:=_~~~~~·--- o; 0.00%'
Total 841 100.00¾ o! -·-o.oo~<
-·--------- ·-· 1 -
776
841
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 78 of 120
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009219
Precinct
Vote by Mail
- ------·-------
Total
0-009220
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009251
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009252
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
0009258
Precinct
122

1.784
1,906
2,215
2,215
2,215
231
00-05219
Precinct
Vote by Mail, 1,231 100.00%
--------------
Total 1,312, 100.00%
-------~-~- --- ---------·---- --Precinct: 6 100.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%

0.00%'
- ··--"-------·------------------- - ------------ - ---------------Total 119 100.00% -------- ----,0009220
2,840' Precinct' 109 100.0-0%
------------------ -----Vote by Mail; 1,478 100.00%
--- ---------'-
2,387; 2,8<0 Total I 1,587. 100.00% ..
1,218
1,727
1,837
130
'0009251
Precinct 46 100.00%
, ---~~~~~>~~i ___ 1~a~2 _,oo.00%
1,343, Total 828 100.00%
·0009252 ----------··-··-
2,146
2,146
;0009258
1,901'.

Vote by Mail
Precinct:
73 100.00%
1,182 100.00%
1,255 100.00%
93 100.00%
0, 0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%
--o.-- o.00% ...

0.00%'

0.00%

0.00%
O.Ofr'¼
0 O.C-0¾

0.00¾
Vote by Mai! -----------"---------1_,9_01;

0.00%·
0009262
0009264
OC-09268
OC09275
0009282
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Vole by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote b)' Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
10th Senatorial District - Total
Cumulative
Cumula~ve
Precinct
____ Vote by_ ~ail __
Total
State Senator•Total
Member Of the State -
~se,riblV
25th Assembly District
0009001
0009005
0009051
0-009055
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total
1,901' Total
____ ___l_ .• _________ ,!,
1,134 100.00%
;0009262
11j 267, Precinct' - 8 100.00% -
-------- ----------'---- -·-------·--"--'
1 so 100.00% 0' 0.00°/4 2i4 267'. Vote by Mail:
---''----------'---- ----------- _J --- ·-21:.7; Total; 158' 10-0.00% 0, O.C-0% Precinct: 40· 100.00% o, 0.00%;
1,999 Vote by Maili 1,089 100.00% - --o.00¾
1,999:
:0009268
2,037,
~037;
To:a1
1 1,129 100.00%
Precinct·
Vote by Mail: 1,123, 100.00% 1,7i8
1,796
- ------·---------- ------- - -·----- -·-------~
128
1,542
1,670
49,286
2,037
2,049
2,049
5'
Total
0-009275
Precin<:t'
Vote by Mail:

Total
Total
Cumulative ----Cumu!at;ve
1,179 100.00%
87 100.00%
1,059 100.00%
· ·1j46 ,oioo¾
1 100.00%
100.00%
6 100.00""/4
33,a"so· 100.00%
---- ----------------------.
0 Precinct 0
". -------~----------- -----
0, ___________ ~---~- Vote by_Ma~i
o O, Total!
O - 01 Cumulative - Total;
58,593: State Senator - Total
- ---- --. ----·---- 1-- · ·r.,-eniber of the State
·--- -----------~·-AsS!!mblv ---
i 25th Assembly District
o.
33,880 100.00%
-----·------ -
0 0.00%
o: 0.00%'
0 0.00%-

0.00%

0.CO%

0.00%
0 O.CO¾

0.00¼
o, 0.00%
o,

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
--~-_-__ :_~---- - __ :~~--~--- - --
--------·-------- --------·- ---~ ""

2.406
~638
3,165'. Precinct;
3,165! Vote by Mail,
3,165
---·--- '0009005 . -
166 100.00%
1,676 100~00%'.
-------- ----------- ---------
360
3,635,
3,995
161
1,446
1,607
4,703.
4,703'
4,703
1,991
5si 51'
-----'
59' 67!
Precinct!
Total'
Total:

Vote by Mail:

Total;
265 100.00%

2.501 100.00%
--- --- - - ·----
2,766 100.00%
121 100.00%
1,067, 100.00%
1,188, 100.00'%,
33 100.00%
-· i4 100.oci/2 -
0 0.00%
0 0.00%

0.00¾

0.00%
o, 0.C<f/4

0.00%
0 0.00%;
o· 0.00%

0.00%'
----------~- --
0 0.00%'

0.00%
000%
81 1,231
1,312
113
119
109
1,478
-- 1,'sSi
46 782
828
73 1,182

1.255
93 1,041
1,134
150
158
40 1,089
1,129
56 ·1:m
1,179
87 1,059
1,146

33.880
33,880
166
1,676
1,842
265

2.501
V66
121
1,067
1,188
33 34
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 78 0(120
0009056
Precinct 218
Vote by Mail 2,449
Total 2,667
0-009059
Precinct 221
Vote by Mail. 2,001
Total 2,222
0009061
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
0-009062
Precinct 118
Vote by Mail ~043
Total 2,161
0009101
Precinct 175
Vote by Mai! 2,626
Total 2,801
0009103
Precinct 64
Vote by Mail 760
Total 82.4,
00-09104
Precinct 132
Vote by Mail 2,416
Total 2,548
0009109
Precinct 127
Vote by Mail 1,502
Total 1,629
0009151
Precinct 171
Vote by Mail 2,269
---- ..
' Tota! 2,440
0009157
Precinct 214
Vote by Mail 2,/51•
Tota! 2,9ss:
0009163
Precinct 55
Vote by Mail 1,212
Total 1,267
0-009166
Precinct 72
Vote by Mail 1,192
Total- 1,264
0-009201
Precinct 45
Vote by Mail 720
Total 765
0-009203
Precinct 91
Vote by Mail 1,446
Tota! 1,537,
0009208
Precinct 107
Vote by Mail 1,159
Total 1,266
0-009210
Precinct 122
Vote by Mail' 1,784
Total 1,906
0'.)09219
Precinct 12
Vote by Mail 176
Total 188
0-009220
(0009056 ! - -- : I - ____ - \_ ___ 1--- -~
3,199 ______ - ___ -- Pr~dnct[ -----~- 1SOj 100.00%:---- OI 0.00¾1 150i 3,199'. Vote by Mail:! 1,66211 100.00%:; o) O.OO¾il 1,6621! 3,199 Tota1: -- ,.s12i -~~~~-~ _____ OT~- ~~L·--~-1,812! . 0009059 . . i i
2,765
~765,
2,765
0-009061
o·
'0-009062
2,525
2,525
~525•
,0009101
3,389
3,389
3,389°
995
995
995
2,986
2,986
2,986
1,982
1,982
1,982
·Q-009103
00()91()4
o; o.oo¾r--·--~,;

1.411. 100~(}0%- 0. O.OO¾i 1,411!
Precinct, 137, 100.00%:

Vol~ by Mail:

Total; --1:548 100.00% Oj ___ Q(){i%\-- 1,548
I
·r
·P;eci~~i~ --0-1----·. . --- . ----~
Vote by Mail' Qi o
1 To-t~t;· · · ;· · oi i - ---o: ··---------,·------·1--- ! i -Precinct! · · 691 100.00%1 Oj ·-o.00%;- 69
Vote by Mail, - 1,457: 100.00%: 0: 0.00%, 1,457:
-- ___ i __ -·------·---------~
Tola!! 1,526) 100.00%; ·-·-o·-Q(}O%i 1,5261
p,,c;~;,i 1,s!-woml ___ -•-~\·-:~!--·-J
--- ________ _L __________ ] __ ,' ---~·---'------!
Vote by Maili 1.B32i 100.00%: o· 0.00%: 1,832i
Total 1,9471 ·10-0.00%! - -0:. 0.00%[_. 1:9471
-. ··-pre~;~-;{-·-- -·- ·41~-,00~¾ 0,0-0%'
Vote by Mail:

T~ta-1:1 -~:s,,_-~~~s·=~~-·---··- ~ -·-u-OO¾i-----575:

I
a1, · 10000¾ · o;---0.00%-· -·
·--- ---·,--------1-----' ~---1,668 100,0Q-i/i QI 0.00%/ 1,668 Total ,,1ss ·-,00-:00%- o! 0.00%-: - 1,1ss.

Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total 1,127
Prednct
Vote by Mail'.
2,951
~951;
2,951;
-- --- - ---- --- ----·--1,658; 10-0,00%1
3,619;
3,619·
f0009i63
1,454
1 1,'\S4j
1,454;
;0009166
1,445.
1,445)
10-009201
891
891'
. 0-009203.
1,773
1,773

1.773
;0009208
1,660,
1,660.
1,650
2,215·

2.215
2,215
231
0009210
0009219-
0009220
Tota!
Vote by Mail:
2~~oi ~00~~%1 ol 0.0-0%1
___ .. _J i i
Precinct 38: 100.00%f 01 0.00%: 38i
Vote by Mail,
~==I-~~~---____ ol_~i __ ~J
870; 10-0.00¾I 01 0.O-O%i 870
; ---1 ------r-~---·r -·
Total
Precinct so, so; 10-0.00%,,! o,! 000%i. .,--~----'. __ 4 ___ ......., __ _,. ____ 1 _ ... _ --~:~~~-~~~~;____ a331 100.00%! o! o.00%j a33I
Total, 883 100,00%1 -01 o00%:---·aal1
I I
Vote by Mail, 495: 100.00%: --- - Of 0.00%' 495,
T~tai:--------529'-100M%! o'.-·--o~'. ---·-·-s-i9'.
- .... '
Precinct:

Vote by Mail:

Total'.-·
I
Vote by Mail:

I
Total'
Precinct;
v;tebyMail)
TOt;1:

Precinct!
--·-------.-- -~--1-~-----; ___ -~--___ I
SS: 100.cYJ¾ o: o.00%: ss·
I
1,021 \ 100.00%· 0.00%1 1,021:
--"---··-' -,.0-76'. 100.00%
oi 0.00%! 6s'
i ! '
776 10-0.00%' --o
1 000%: 116
841 ! ,oo.oo¾l ol o.00%i s41 1
T - r __J .. ~ -!--.. -···-'
81: 100.00%1 01 0.00%1 811
-,~231
1 - 100.00%! - oi ··-oMf-----1-.23-1
1,312; 100.00¾' o! o.00% 1,312
·----·--1-
1 0! 0.0-0%1 6
113
, __ .. __ ! -·--'----
Vote"by ~fail, 113 100.00%- - oi o.oo~(
Tot~!· - 119-,00-:-QO¾,
I
0,00% 119
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 78 of 120
OC-09251
OC-09252
OC-09258
OC09262
0009264
0009268
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Prednct
Vote by Mail
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
157
2,230
67 1,151

2.840

2.840
'0009251
1,343:
1,3-43
..... '----..J.--
1,218 1,343:
. ,0009252
110: --- 2,146'. .
1,484
1,614
11 214
225
70 1,712,
1,782
;0009258
1,901,
1,901
\QQ09262
267:
267
,0009264
1,999
/0009258
Precinct. 109 100.00%
----~---------
Vot~ by Mail 1,478 100.00¾
Total 1,587 1-00.00%
Precinct!
Vote by Mail:

Precinct;
Vote by Mail,
i
46 100.00%
782 100.00%
73· 100.00%
1,182, 100.00%
Total; 1,255, 100.00%'
-----------
Precinct:

Vote by Mail'
I
93: 100.00%
-- ---a· 100.00%
150 100.00%
Total 158 100.00%
Total; 1,129 100.00%
----------- -------- -- -----------
o, 0.00%
O; 0.00%

0.00%
ci'. O.C-0%
o; ·oc-0%:
o: O.C-0%,
0:. O.C-0%.
- -o-
1 - O.C-0%
o, 0.00%
o: 0.CO%
O.CO'½
o· --a.co¾

0.00%
o, 0.00%
Qi 0,00%

0.CO¾

0. 0.CO%
109
1,478
1,587
46 782
828
73 ,-,,ai
1,255
93 1,041
1,134
150
15S
40 1,089
,~129
Precinct 78 '. 2,037; ____ ........ _________ __,_ ____________ , .. , ....

Precinct 56: 100.00% 0.00% 56
1,123

1. 179
Vote by Mail 1,718' 2,037; Vote b}' MaHi 1,123 100.00%
OC-09275
0009282
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
25th Assembly District - Total
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Cumulative - Total
Merrib"er·of the-Sfa!E!-AsSe·mHy.
_total
Board of Equalization (State)
State Boat'd bf Eq·u-aliZiltiOrl­
#2 ..

OC09001
0009005
0009051
0009055
0009056
0009059
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mal!
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail,
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct'
Vote by Mail
1,795, 2,037i
----~------
Total; 1,179 100.00% 0.00¼
i0009275
Precinct[ 87• 100.00% o; a.CO¾
Vote by--M-ail.!.; ---1,0_5_9_-. -100-.00%-~--- O.CO¾
1,670 Total! 1,146'. 100.00% 0.00%:

Predr.ct' ,. 100.00%: 0 0.00%
j0009282
s! ' ' ------------------
Vote by Mail
I ---~--------- 1·------ Total. 5 I
-- 4~~2;;----------5;;3·, - 25th Assembly District- Total, 49,286
. '
o.

Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail'
Total'
0 Cumulative - Total
58,593' Member of the State Assembly,
_________ T,:,t;:,I __ _
Board of Equalization (State) !
-·state-eOa"rd bf.E"q-Ua11Za"tio·l1 - -
-------·-·-- #2 __________ _
0009001
s, 100.00%
6 100.00%
33,880' 100.00%
0 0
33,880' 100.00%
-------------------·---- . ---------------
232
2,406
2,638
3,155'
3,165'
Precinct
3,165 Tota(
166 100.00%
1,616 ·· 100:wAi-­
,.a4z 100.00% ·
0009005 ----· --------- -- .
360 _ ~~~~,~------ Precinct/
. ·-~-----"-~-~~~-by_M_•i~tj ___ 2.so1 100.00% 3,635, 4,703. 255. 100.00%
3,995' ____ 4,_70_3_::_ ------
:0009051
2,766 100.00%
0, 0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%
o,
0 0.00%

0.00%,
o· 0.00%
o, 0.00%'

0.00%·
161'

1.446
1,607'
1,991'. Precincti 121, -100-.0-0%---- -·-·o:ooi<.·
58 59
1,991: Vat~ by Mai!j

1.9911 ---·-·rot~1: ---
•--! \0009-0_55 _____ _
Precinct: 67
67 Vote by Mail:
0009056
1,067 100:0-0% -
1,188 100.00%
1 100.00%
33 100.00%
34' 100.00% -
- --------------- ·-----~~------·------- ------··---------- 218 3,199
2,449 3,199
150 100.00%
1,6621 lOOW/2 -
Precinct:
!
V~byM~ir;
2,667 Tota!; 1,812 100.00%
0009059
O' 0.00%
o,

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%'
87 ·1,059
1,146
33,880
33,880
166
1,676
1,842
265
2,501
2766
121
1,067
1,188
33 34
1,662
1,812
221 2,765.
_____ ,: ·-·----·-----
Precin<t! 137 100.00%
1,411 100.00%
0 0.00% - --- . 137
-------~
2,001 Vote by Mail
____ J_ o: 0.00% 1,411
12/2/2020 1:58:36 Pl•l
ftage: 78 o( 120
Total 2,222
0009061
Ptecinct 0,
Vote by Mai!
-•
Total
0009062
Precinct 118
Vote by Mail 2,0-13
Total 2,161
0009101
Precinct 175
Vote by Mail 2,626
Total 2,801
0009103
Precinct 64
Vote: by Mail 760'
Total 824
0009104
Precinct 132
Vote by Mail 2,416
Total 2,548;
0009109
Precinct 127
Vote by Mail 1,502
Tota! 1,629
0009151
Precinct 171
Vote by Mail 2,269
Total 2,440
0009157
Precinct 214
Vote by Mail 2,751
Total 2,965
0009163
Precinct 55,
Vote by Mail 1,212
Total 1,267
0009166
Precinct 72
Vote by Mail 1.192:

Total 1,264!
0009201
Precinct 45
Vote by Mail no'
Tota! 765
0009203
Precinct 91'
Vote by Mail 1,446
Total 1,537
0009208
Precinct 107
Vote by Mai! 1,159
Tot3.I 1,266
0009210
Precinct 122
Vote by Mail 1,784
Total 1,90G
0009219
Precinct 12
Vote by Mai! 176
Total 188
0009220
Precinct 157
Vote by Mail 2,230
Total 2,387
00092S1
Precinct 67
Vote by Mzil 1,151
2,765:
0009061_ ---~~~----Total: ~::· ::_1,54r0000%: :~~-ir OM¾! . 1,548]
0 Precinct\ -· ~-~ 01 -~ __ _)
------o~t,i__ ' o' ·-··01
.0009062
2,525:
2,525
2,525'
'0009101
3,389
3,389
3,389,
:0009103
995'
995
995,
.0009104
2,986•
2,986;
2,986'
'0009109
v~_t:+by Mall! 0
oi ·---~ i ---- o; Total'
-p~~,j~ct,I
v;te by Maiii
Total;
i
Precinct!
voteb;,-·M;;i;··
i
o, ' .. -----------------7
I I
i9-: 100.00%1- oi o.00%; - 69.
1,4s1 ,00:00%,----o~ o.w1o 1As1.
o1 -o.rnw{ ,.s26,
--------------- --~---·/ ___ !' ____ :
11s: 100.00¾ o; a.om~; 11s;
-----u32~-100.00%· ----~,(- 0.00%! - - -,.-aJi'
I
To_t_al'-: ___ 1_,947i 100.00'/4: ___ ·_·o-'-! ____ o~~::i----~-~~:

Precinct:

V~te by M~il:

Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
41' 100.00%: 0.00%
1 411
534i 100.00%;-----o;--0.-00%-:-:----53-4 !
.. 575: 100,00,f o: i

0.00%j
87' 100.00%; 0j 0.00%1 87;
.... 266(_~°.°.:_~i- -··--· - _t 000%,---1,-66-,8'.
0/ 0.00% 1 1,755, 1,755· 100.00"'/4:
-- :
. -· --··---··------- ----'-------'---
1,982

1.982
1,982
0009151
2,951'
2,951
2,951
0009157
3,619
3,619
3,619
0009163
Precinct 85 100.00% 0
1 0.00%; 85'.
-·1:0,2 100.00%, ·o· --0~00%,-----·1:-o:.,
Total o: 0.00% t,127
-----~---·-+----· -----
· · ----- ------ i Precinct 123; 100.00% o
1 o,0-0%~----- 12.3_·
V~te bY Man"
Total--
Precinct
Vote by Mail:

Tota(
1,535 100.00"/4.

1.6S8 100.00%;
i
1,535,
1,658
---------------
144. 100.00% o: 0.00%
--- 1,905· 100.00%: --- ol
!
2,050; 100.00"; oi
--i - - --- ---,-
144
1,90£_
2,0501
1,454
1 Pteclnct 38! 100.00% oi 0.00%'. 35;
1,4s4r --- V~t;·by M·;u: a32i--,oo.00%: ·--------·-0/
1 --0~00%\
1 -•-- •----a32{
_I_ I
l,4S4; Total) - - - - 87(}i-160~:-- ---o: 0.00%1 ____ --87~1. :0009_1~6_ ____ ._____ --;--•---: i ·--
1,44Sj Precinct! SO! 100.00%' 01 0.00%i
~-~~~ -- ~-~~~:~-~~ii) ____ -~33~ 100.00%j oi o.00%i ____ a3~3i 50\
--~.~~;.i-- Total,' 883, 100.000( o! 0.00%1! ·-ai3l
- -·1·0009£01 ------~--------· i
891,
1,773'
1,660
1,660
2,215
0009203
0009208
0009210·
----,--
2,21s:
2,215'
231-,
... --·-·-· : __ _
Vote by Mail
Total'
Ptecinct,
Vote by Mail, ·
Total
Precinct
4951 100.00%1
529 100.00%;
55'. 100.00¾i
i
1,021: 100,00%
1,076· 100.00%
o' I
oi 0.00%:
··r o:00%1
I
55;
oi o.00% · 1,0211
-- -,r 0.00% 1.016:
- --· ----------:~ !----·----I-----------.;
----- ·--------
65 100.00%' 0: 0.00%
Vote by Mail 776 100:0Q¾:-- Oj 0.00% 7761
Total 841: 100.00%
1 o'. 0.00%: 8411
-•---------:--------~'
Precinct 8\ 100.00%;
Vote by Mai! 1,23ti 100.00%: 1,231'.
--r~ti--
-.---~-=--·~~==-__ I i ------; ------·7
Precinct; ... 6j 100.00%i _ O! 0.00%1 6i
Vote by Maitf-- ---- 113i 100.00%\ -- o; 0~00%1----113] ·-1~t;1I 1191 ,oo.00%! oi --o.oo¾/ ,19;
000_92~----=--== I . I ----i
__ Pr~i-~,-~-- --------~~~~~~~i o\ 0.00%\ ·109:
2,840:

Vote by M~\_ 1,41a: 100.00%: 0,
1 o.00%/ 1,41aj
Total, 1,587' 100.00-¼; ·- -·ol -0.00%1-·-·-··-,:-ssi,
·0009251--. -- --------------· --·-1
Precinct - - 46,· 100.00¾;1 ----:o+:-o~.00~~,,,+-, ____ 4_:6 -·--~----- j ~--- I
Vote by Mail: 0
I 0.00%1 782
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Pa9e: 78 of 120
0009252
C-009258
0009262
0009264
C009268
CC-09275
0009282
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Pre<inct
Vote by Mail
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mal!
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
1,218
110
1,121:
1,837.
1,343
2,146
2,146
2,146,
Total
Vote by Mail;
TOta1:
828 100.00%
H 100.1)0%'
1,182 100.00%
1,2ss1 100.00%
0, 0.00%

0.00%

0.00¾
0 0,00%
\0009258 I
-- -----~-- ------- --------' -~--- ·--- ---•----·
130
i,484
1,712
1,782
75·
1,718
1,796
1,901
1,901:
1,901
1,999:
1,999
1,999,
2,037.
2,037
,--------··-·--
128'
2,049
0009275
Precinct:

Vote by Mail!
-TOtai1'
Vote by Mail'
93; 100.00% 0.00%
1,041, 100.00%: · ·o· o.00%
1,134: 100.00% 0.00%:
150, 100.00%
100.00¾'
o, 0.00%
0 0.00%
o· 0.00%
1,089 100.00%· 000%'
' ' ---·------·---··--
Total
Vote by Mail;
Total'
Vote by Mail1
1,129' 100.00%'
1,123 100.00%
1,179 100.00%
1,059 100.00%

0.00%
·o. 0.00%

0.00¾

0.00%
0 0.00%
1,542
1,670'
------------'---
2,049 0 0.00%
,0009282
3 s: Precinct: 1 100.00% o, 0.00%
Vote by Mall[ 5 100.00% -- 0 0.00%
--- ---- -----~---------- --
Tota!1 6 100.00%· 0 0.00%
·-·-----------·-
828
73 1,182
1,255
158
1,089
1,129
56 1,123
1,179
87 1.059
1,146
Precinct,
Vote by Mail
Tota.I
State Board bf EGua!iZiltfOfl #2 .-­
Total 49,286 sa,593] State Board Of Equalization #21 ll.880' 100.00% 0 0.00% 33,880 Cumulative
Cumulative
Cumulative
~~· -.. --·--------·------_:.,c_u_m_ul-,tive-. --· /
Precinct o; 0,
Vote by Mail! Vote_byMai!_ o: _____ o,;
·----~---:°.o~~---·----·--0, ___ O:

To~, 0 . ~- -- -
Cumulative - Total
Board Of Equa!iZiitiOrl {state)·~
Total
-- -~it~·-
Cit_y of Santa Clara
0009001
0009005
0009051
0009055
0009056
0009059
0009061
0009062
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote ~Y_!~a~ ..

Total
Precinct
o ~o--·- Cumulative:Tota!; 0 . -·-- -·()
49,286' 58,593' B-oardofEqualization{State) •· 33,860' · 100.00%; Tnt:>I' _______________________ _
City
, City of Santa Clara "0000001 ,, ____ _
232 3,165
2,406 3,165,
2,638 3,165
360' 4,703
3,635 4,703:
3,995
161
1,446
1,607
4,703
1,991
1,991;
Precinct!
Vote by Mai!:
0009005 ----
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total:
0009-051
Precinct.

Vote by Maili
0009055
166 100.00%
. -•---- ---· ·--
1,676 100.00%
1,842 100.00%
265 100.00%
2,so·, · ,·oo:00%. -
2,766 100.00%
121 100.00¾
1,067 100.00%
1,188 100.00%
--------------------~------- --t 100.00% ________ _
58 59,
Precinct. : .
- Vote by Mail] 33 100.00% · --
1 Tota!1 34 100.00%
o:- 0.00¼

0.00%
o, 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00¼

0.00%
-··,{ 0.00%
O:

0.00%'

0.00%

0.00%
--~---·----- .. , ___ ,. ___ .. - -----'-----·------ .,_., 218
2,449
,0009056
3,199'
3,199
Precinct; 150 100.00%
Vote by Mail' 1,662 100.00%
'

2.667: 3,199
1 Total 1,812 100.00%
2,001,
2,222.
-----,0009059
Precinct 137' 100.00%
2,765, ' .
2,765'., Total 1,548: - 100.00% --- - -
\0009061 -----·--- :------- -
------- --- -·
O' Precinct 0.

Vote by Mai!
0 000%

0.00%
o, 0.00%
0 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
--------·-----------· Total - . o:
0009062
Vote by Mai! 2,043, Vote by Mai! 1,457 100:ooii

0.00%
000%
------'--
33,880.
i66
1,676
1,842
265
2,501
2,766
121
1,067
1,188
150
1,€62
1,812
137
1,411
1,548
69 1,457
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PH
Page: 78 of 120
0009101
0009103
0009104
0009109
0009151
0009157
0009163
0009166
0009201
0009203
0009208
0009210
000'9219
0009220
0009251
0009252
0009258
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mait
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mair
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total:

Precinct
Vote by Mall
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct'
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
2,161
175
2,626
2,801
64 760
824
132
2,416,
2,54S
127
1,502
1,629
171
2,269
2,440
2,965
55 1,212
1,267
1,192
1,264
91 1,446
1,537
107,
1,159
1,266
122
1,784
1,906
12 176'
183
157

2.230
2,387
67 1,151
1,218
110
1,727
1,837
130
2,525,
;0009101
3,389
3,389,
3,389
995
995
995
0009103 -
:0009104
2,986,
2,986'
2,986'
;0009109
1,982,
1,982,
1,98<
:Ooo91s1
2,951,
2,951
2,951
3,619,
3,619
3,619_
1,454
1,454
1,454:
1,445;
1,445"
1,«5:
0009157
0009163
0009166
0009201
-----------·--" Total[ 1.526: 100.00%: --- -- or 0.00%1 1,526! ,;,:;n~:-- --=1~--1~:,r - -- 0(-0.00%! -- iis;
. Vot&by-~1·au;· 1,s32 100.00% a\ o.w/4: -1~a32;
Totat'. -1,947'. 100M1%;-- ··!- -· --- - 1,947
------'--------~: - 0.00%! ~ --
Pree!~.~·--_ 100.000/2 ai ·- 0.00%i -
Vote by Mail! 100.00% - -- - - -or -O~---"°s34
TO-ta-1! ---- Sis: 100~00%' --- o
1 o.oo%i -575,
---- ------·-- I-· ---------t--
i
Precinct 87· 100.00¾· o: 0.00%:
-~-------,--___ __l ______ ! ______ , ____ _
Vote by Mail: 1,668; 100.00¾ o: 0.00%1 1 668
rot,1 -- l;iss;_1_oo~~t- oi 000%! ---~~~"
I i
_____ ssi __ 100.oo~\ _________ ~i o.00%; 85
----·-voteby~taii_____ 1,042; 100.00%: al o.00%! -- 1~042'. i ______ I _______ ! _________ ,
Precinct
Total ______ -1:12~.:~~_:_~'. ___ -________ j __ ~~/ --------~27! Precinct
Precinct
Vote bY Mail
Total
! I
----~' ' ' 123: 100.00%/ o; 0.00%] 123-
144 100.00% - ~- -o~- "o.00%'------,«.
- ______ i ____ i ___ _
1,906 100.00%:
2,050. 100.00%
o, 0.00%, 1,906:
0,00%1 ~050!
------- ------- - ---
---------------- -----. --------·
Precinct 38 100.00% o· o.00%: 38.

V~te by Mi(.
-TOt-al
832· 100.00%
870 -,0000'/4
_____ L
if 0.00¾:

O· - ti00%1
-iii
870
Precinct·- "--------50·---j()O_QO¾ ______ - o1 0.00%: ----50:
-- ---- ------ _____________ ! ____ ! - ---
V~t~bYi1~i1: 833 100.oo<'/21 Oj 0.00%:

Total 883, 100.00%1 Oi
I

0.00%!
I
- - ---------------------:·- ----:----;'---~----
891! ---~- --~r~dn __ " ____ 3_4
1 100.0-0%\r ____ octr_...,o,-coocc%+l ____ l4-'i
891( Vote by Mail 495i" 100.00%! 01 0.00%\ 49Si
-·-------+----,--~--'
891; Total - s·29/ 10-0.00%i 01 0.00%i 529;
-rooos203---- :-----------:----:------;'!.__---+-----'------ -- ' ________ i ______ [ ____ -'----1 _ _.__ 1,773 Prednct
1 ss' 100.00%~ 0j 0.OO¾i ssi
1,773i -- -Voteby~t~l\- 1,0211. 1~~~~- -~l __ 0.00%) ______ ~~~~1 1i 1,773; 1,01Gi 100.00%1 oi 000%1 1,016!
[OQOgi{)i --~---- , __________ ! _____ j_ _ I --1----;
1,660: Prednct,1 65/ 100.00%/ ___ or 0.00%;
1 : 6S1
_ ·-··--------1-". --------·--'.~--' ______ I --~------ - ,~~~~\- Vote by Mail: 776: 100.00%: a: O.OOo/~I 776i
T0~1i -- . ·--- M1t ·100~00%:·--- ---o~-- o.00%:----·----6411 1,660,
'0009210
2,215:
2,215'.
2,215
231
231'
231:
0009219
·-:0009220

2.840
2,840'
2,8,10:
'0009251
1,343'.
1,343,
1,343
2,146,
2,146
2,146,
0009252
:0009258
1,901.
, , 1 I I
,' - - 1- 1
·---------: ______ , ____ ___1 ___ ~--~----
Prednct; 81'. 100.00%. Oi 0.00%! 81]
Vote by Mail: 1,231 100.00%: Oi O.W/21
·r~t;f- 1,312: 100.00¾' .. o-\ o.00%!
i --------- -----------------; -------- ------
Precmct, 6 100.00% oi 0.00%: ---6;
-------- ------------
Vote by Mail; 113. 100.00%: 0j 0.00%: --- -,13'
Total 119: 100.00¾: - o;---O.W'/2(--------,-,-9:
-___ , -·-------' I -----l
----- i i
----~~~~~~~!-------~~~·00%1___ oi _ o.00%\ 1091
VotebyMail! 1.478. 100.00¾'. oi 0.00%~- 1.478
1 -,.~tar- 1,S87! 100.00%
1 ,,. 01 -"Qooi: ------· 1 587:
- --L.____ 1 _______ , I . '°1 ' /
, __ _c_ ____ l
Pre"cinct, 46~ 100.00%' 01 0.00%\
"v~te-~/~1-aii'.-_______________ ; ______ _
Total:
782' 100.00%;
828 100.00%:

0.00%'
i

0.00%;
I
-----+-------~---i _____ .) __ _
: : i
782;
828'
I
Precincti ------'-----·-' ------ :-' --~----
731_ ~~~~~~ ___ ·--~l 0.00%11 i
Vote by Mail: 1.182: 100.<Xf/4
Total: 1,255 100.00%:

0.00%1
73 1,182
1,255
93 12/2/2020 1:SS:36 PM
Page: 78 of 120
0009262
0009264
0009268
0009275
0009282
Vole by Mai!
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
City of Santa Clara. Total
Cumulative
Cumulati\'e
1,484
11 214
225
70 1,712'
1,782
78 1,718
1,796
128
1,901
1,901
267
267
267
1,999
1,999
1,999:

2.037

2.037

2.037

2.049
0009262
0009264
Vote by Mai!'
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Tota!
1 1,041 1 100.00%
1,134, ;·oo~OO¾
8 100.0C%
-,50
1 100.W'/2
156 "100:00¾
Precinct 40 100.00%
·vot~-bYM~_------1,069 --,00.00%
Total
Total
Precinct:
1,129 100.00%
100J)0%
1,123 100.00%
-----------··
1,542 2.049. Vote by Mail: 1,059 100.00%

2.049
49,286 58,593
Total 1,146 100.00%
·-·-. -- ---~--
Precinct 1 100.00%
Total'
City of Santa Clara • Total:

Cumulative
,Cumulative
100.0C%
100.00%
33,880 100.0C%
Precinct o·
Vote by Mai~
Total
Cumulative - Total Cumulative• Total; O
City· Total 49,286 58,593, City-Total! 33,880 100.00%
Unincorporated Area
_ _ __ ~ni~~~~P~!~~':_d
0009001
0009005
00090S1
0009055
0009056
0009059
0009061
0009062
0009101
0009103
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Tora!
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Tota!
Precinct
Vote by Mc1il
Total
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
. ~~~e by Mail
Tota!
Vote by Mail
Total
Vote by Mail
Total
Precinct
----,-------.;....__:U:::n;:::"'=o 2rp::o-;:ra:::t•:::d.:"Ar:.:•::• _______ _ Unincorporatl!d
:0009001 ..
·--------- ·---~-·-·-- ·-------
3,165.
2,406' l,165' Vote by Mail 1,676 100.00%
'
2,638 3,165'
- ·------. -------
Total, 1,842 100.00%,
:0009005
------- -~---------··-------·---------
4,703; Precinct 265 100.00%
3,635 4,703 Vote by Mai!: t5Cn, 1onoo¾ -
3,995·
161
1,446
1,607
58 59
4,703'
1,991
1,991
1,991
67 67,
67 218 3,199,
2,449 3,199
2,667 3,199
221 2.765
2,222 2,765
0009051
0009055
0009056
0009059
Total
Precinct
\10\E by tiail -­
- - TOta!i
Precinct'
Vote by Mc1il:

Tota!
Pre,dnct
Vote by Mai11

2.766 100.00%
. ----------
121 100.00%

1.067 100.00%
iJ88 · 100.00¾
1 100.00%
33 100.00%
34 100.00%
i50. 100.00%

1.662 ··-,-oo.00%
- - - -~-----·--·-
Total 1.812- 100.00¾'
-P-r'e~i~ct, - 137 100.00%
Vote by Mail: 1,-4-11 100.00%
1,548 100.00%.
o: o· Vote by Mail
~ 0 .
:0009052 --·-·.·----··-·--'
2,525

2.525
2,161 2,525
175

2.626

2.801

64. ,0009101

3.389-
3,389
3,389
0009103
995
Vote by Mail,
Vote by Mail:
1,457 100.00%.
- -- --- __ : -----
1,526 100.00%
115 100.00%
1,832 100.00%

0.00%
0 0.00%

0.00%
OO<P/4

0. 0.00%
o.00%·

0.00%

0.00%
' 0 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
a· o.00% ·
o: 0.()0%

0.00%
o: 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
O' 0.00%
0, 0.00%
o· 0.00%
o· 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
-0 0.00%

0.00%.

0.00%
o· 0.00%

0.00%

0.00%
000%.

0.00%
OJ 0.00%
0 0

0.00%
0 0.00%
O' 0.00%
0 0.00%

0.00%
0 0.00¾

0.00%
1,041
1,134
150
158
40 1,089
1,129
56 1,123
1,179
87 1,059
1,146
33,880

33.880
1,842
265
2,501

2.766
121
1,067
1,188
33 34
150
1,662
1,812
137
1,411
1,548
69 1,457
1,526
115
1,832
1,947
41 12/2/2020 1:58:36 p,,,
P'age: 78 of 120
Vote by Muil 760
Total 824
-0009104
Precinct 132
Vote by Mail 2.416:

Total 2,548
0009109
Precinct 127
Vote by Mail 1,502
Total 1,629
0009151
Precinct 171·
Vote by Mail 2,269
Total ~440
0009157
Precinct 214'
Vote by Mai! 2,751
Total 2,965
0009163
Precinct 55
Vote by Mall 1,212
Total 1,267
0009166
Precinct 72
Vote by Mail 1,192
Total 1,264
0009201
Precinct 45
Vote by Mail 720
Total 765
0009203
Prednct 91
Vote by Mail 1,446
Tota! 1,537;
0009208
Precinct 107
Vote by Mall 1,159
·;
Total 1,2661
0009210 .,._,.
,~~! .. Precinct
I
Vote by Mail 1,784:

Total 1,906
0009219
Precinct 12,
Vote by Mail 176
Total 188
0009220
Precinct 157
Vote by Mail 2,230'
Total 2,387
0009251
Precinct 67
Vote by Mail 1,151
Total 1,218
0009252
Prednct 110
Vote by Mail 1,727:

Total 1,837
0009258
Precinct 110·
Vote by Mail 1,484'
Total 1,614
0009262
Precinct 11
Vote by Mail 21'
Total 225
0009264
995
995:
·;0009104-
2,986
2,986
2,986
1,982'
1,982
1,982
0009\09
.0009151
2,951
2,9s,'
2951'
:,1009,-57 -,
3,619
3,619,
3,619°
. 0009-163

1.454:
1,454
1,454:
0009166
1,445,
1,445
1,445
;0009201
891 1
891
1 891j
:0009203
1,773;
I
-·---y-
. Precincti o
1 o.0-0%;
Total•
534' 100.00%, o; o.00%! 534;
s1f 100.00% o! 000¾
1 :----
. ______ :_______ . ·--'ol ____ s1_s
··-··-·---'--· ______ l _______________ ~-·
87; 100.00%:
·vo,e ·by M~n!
I
-Toi,;f
.. -~~~~~! -~~-~~~;;-; ____ oij __ -o_.0-0%_--+--! _
1,755. 100.00%: 0
1 OJ)O%!
r----·-------- ,---· ----~--~,
P~ednctf' ·as: 100.00%
1 --Vote by-Ma~-- 1,042; 100.00%'.

Total; 1.127~ 100.00%i
·---' ---- ___ , --··----."
Prednctj
Vote by Maiti
123'-, -,oo=.oo-,.~,--- ·oi
. , _____ !_ I
1,535 100.00%: 0,

0.00%

0.00%: 1,535
1 1,Gs8: 100.00%\ oi o.00¾~:------~ss:i
-: ------:-----1----1-i ___ ...;
: I I
. 144i 100.00%1,, ol 1 I o.00%i 144)
Vote by Mall: 1,906: 100.00%· ·-or --Q.00%:-·-1,906;
+-----! , i l
Total! 2,050 10-0.00%; · · 01 0.00%'. 2,050
I
Prednct/--
--lJ~W·by M;Ni
i
Total!-
Pre;i~ctj
--··-- -···-·'-Vote by Mail,,
_I
Total'
Precinct!
- VOte-by. M~ii!
Total:
·----;-------.
s32
1 100.00%: o!· -OM;---- -
810· 100.00%'-____ o/...: -o.00%· 870
·----~- --------· -----~------·----·-- -----
1 so~- ioo.00%:· -- ·--- o o.0-0% - - so.
---------·--·-
833: 100.00%;
34 100.00%'
49S' 100.00%: o
1 s29; 100-.w.-,.-,----o-'-:

I
OJ)O%]

0.00¾
1 !
495·
529,
1~;73\ ·-·-----------~~te b~ Mail! 1,021 I 100.00¾j o: 0.00%; Total:--......,,-;;,0"'16°,· -,-oo-.00-%+-, ----'Oi--0.-00%-'-:­ 1,021
I
1,076; 1,77:L.
:ooonos
I

1.6601 ·---· Precinct! o' I

0.00"'/2!
i
1,660) Vote by Mail/ 776' 100.00%; 776:
· Total\1 841 ! 100.00%: o: I
·-70009210 l !
2:~1;, - ------=~--;;~-~,..,~-,7~.------_-_-_--_8:-:1+-; -,=00.00"'"-i'.----o.J.j __ o.00_%.:.i _____ s-,j 2,21s; VotebyMaill 1,231; 100.00%1 o! o.OO¼\ 1,231\
2,215; - Total! ---·---~312;100.00if-~-----or-0-.0-0_%.,_; ---,-,3-1"2 ,';;00;;;;0;:92;-;1;:9-------+-i ----,'---...!.-----:....--''-· ___ _.,, ---;c-::-:;;:c::t-----:;;-;=-c=i----.J....---'------i
231; .:r:~n~~! 6 100.00%; Oi O.OCr%! 6j
23/ VotebyMail: 113: 100.00%: o: 0.00%!
2lf
. 10009220-··
2,840
2,840,
2,840·
1,343

1.343
0009251
0009252
.. Total! 119·-·1oolio%; 119i I
Precinct.

Precinct
Vote by Mall;
Total
--- --- ----------------- - --
- -· - ---~---
461 100.00%:
' ' s2a; - 100.00%ii - o/
--- ···----·--------.,..---,-----
PreCffl-Zt- 13: 100.00¼
1 --ot o.oo\ 13:
. I-··--·-- l ! . i
VotebyMail 1,1a2: 100.00%\ Oj 0.00%! 1,182!

2. 146 -·------ -=~---~:~-------~~~s-~; __ ~0.4________ oi __ ~~~~~------~~~sl . ·;00<}925i 1,901;

1.901\
1,901:
267
267
267
0009262
.0009264
Precinct' 93· 100.00% o'. 0.00%' 93_
1 -· --·-·-----,------- ' ~' __ _.1,_ __ __c
V:te~y--<aH ____ 1,041 -~00~:; _____ oi OO-O¾i 1,041
Totat; 1,134: 100.00%; o;-0.~----1,134.
---•.}----~---' - __ _., ___ _
Precinct:
-Vote· bY Man:

Total]
150 100.00%
158 100.00%

0.00%: 1so;
o. 0.00%: 158
12/2/2020 1:58:36 PM
Page: 78 of 120
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009268
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009275
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
0009282
Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Unincorporated - Tota!
Cumulative
Cumulative
Precinct
Vote ~r.!~~i~
Total
Cumulative - Total
Unincorporated Area - Total
70 1,712
1,999 Precinct--
Vote by Mail
40 100.00%
1,089 100,00%
1,762 1,959
78 1,718
1,796
1,670
3,
0009268
Precinct!
' ' -~-•-- --•~----- -
2,037,
'0009275
Vote by Mail
---- -- -----~----
2,049; Precinct
2,049, Vote by Man:
_______ .,1, __ _

1.123 100.00%
1,179, 100.00%
87' 100.00%
1,059; 100.00%
2,049
1 Total: 1,146' 100.00%
]00092a2·· _______ .,
s; Prednctl
Vote by-Mail: 5 100.00°/4
1: 100.00%
5' . '
49,286
s' Total; 6, 100.00"/4
---------~~------- --------------
ss,593: Unincorporated - Tota11 33,880 100,00%
-----------·-··
---~--'.- ------~~-~~~~- ----' ---~--- -
;Cumulative
Precinct
Vote by Mail:
0 0;
·-------------·- -----·-··-----------
.. --~; _____ _
0 Cumulat~-~-TOtaJ
Total
49,286 58,593° Unincorporated Area - Total 33,880' 100.00% 0,00%

0.00%.

0.C0¾
o: . 0.CO¾'

0.00%
o· o.00%
0 0.00%

0.00%
o: 0.00%
0 0
0 -□

0.00%
40 1,089
1,129
56 1,123
1,179
87 1,059
1,146
33,880
0 33,880
12/2/2020 1:58:36 p~:

Page: 104 of 120 12/2/2020 7:28:39 PM
Measure E - City of Santa Clara, Transient Occupancy Tax (Vote for 1) ~ ~ :g u ~ ~
~ ·en~
~
0 • District ~ g District ~ ;= ----- z
Countywide Countyt.vide
Election wide Electionwide
PrednctJ 3,452 58,593 Precinct 1,898 62.83'!61 1,123 37.17% 3,021 VotebyMaill 45,8 31 58,593 Vote by Mail 31,285 74.34%; 10,800 25.66% 42.085 Electionwide • Total! 49,283 58,593 Electionwide - Total 33,183 73.57%1 11,923 26.43% 45,1D6 Cumulative Cumulative
Prednct 1 o! 0 Precinct OJ 01 O;
Vote by Mail: o' Vot e by Mail Oi 01 o;
Cumulative-Total1 o; 0, Cumulative - Total o; 0: O!
Countywide - Total) 49,283j 58,593: Countywlde - Total, 33,183! 73.57%1 11,923! 26.43%j 45,106I Congressionill District Congressio nal District
17th Congressional District 17th Congressional District Precinct 3,452i 58,593 Precinct 1,898 62.83%! 1,123· 37.17%/ 3,021 Vote by Mail 45,831 58,593 Vote by Mail 31,285 74.34%, 10,800· 25.66%; 42,085; 17th Congressional District - 49,2831 58,593 17th Congressional District - 33,1 83 73.57% 11,923j 26.43%! 45,1061 Ota w
Cumulative Cumulative
Precinct Precinct 0 o;
Vote by Mail 0 Vote by Mail o· Q 01
Cumulative - Total 0 Cumulative - Total D o,
Congressional District -Tota l 49,283 58,593 Congressional District - Total 33,183 73.57%1 11,9231 26.43'J6j 4S,106! State Senator State Senat or
10th Senatorial District , 0th Senatorial District
Precinct 3,4521 58,593 Precinct 1,898; 62.83%1 1.1231 37.17%! 3,021 Vote by Maill 45,831 58,593 Vote by Mail 31,285 74.34%1 10.soo: 25.66%1 42.08!. 10th Senatorial District - Tata! 49,2831 58,593 10th Senatorial District- Total 33,1831 73.57%1 11,9231 26.43%, 45,10; Cumulative Cumulative
Precinct ol Precinct 01 01 01
Vote by Mail o\ Vote by Mail 01 0 01
Cumulative - Total ol 0 Cumulative - Total o. 0
State Senator- Tota! 49,283, 58,593 State Senator- Total 33,183' 73.57%i 11,923: 26.43%I 45,1061 Member of the State Member of the State
L....... Assemblv. ~mkl
25th Assembly District 25th Assembly District
Precinct 3,4521 58,593' Precinct! 1,898 62.83% 1,123 37.17% 3,021 Vote by Mail 45,831 58,593 Vote byMaill 31,285 74.34% 10,800 25.66% 42,085 25th Assembly District - Total 49,283! 58,593, 25th Assembly Dlstrict-Total l 33,183 73.57% 11,923 26 .43% 45,106 Cumulative Cumulative
Precinct 0; o, Precinct\ o, 01 ol
Vote by Mail 0 Vote by Mall! 0, o! O'
Cumulative - Tota! O: Cumulative - Total· Oi 0) oj
I Member of the State Assembly . ~ .l:S:l 5&59] Member of the State Assembly 33,183; 73.57%! 11,9231 26.43%1 45,106, _ Total
Board of Equalization (St21te) Board of Equalization (State) State Board Of Equallzation State Board Of Equ1 bation
~2 #
Page: 104 of 120
Precinct
Vote by Mail
'state BOai-d Of E(l-ualizatiO'n #2.
____ _lotal
Cumulative
City of_~anta Clara
Precinct
Vote by Mai!
Cit~ of Santa Clara - Total
Cumulative
City - Tota!
3,452
45,831
49,283
49,283
3,452
45,831
49,283
49,283
58,593
58,593
58,593
58,593
58,593
58,593
58,593
5B,593
12/2/2020 7:28:39 PM
Precinct 1,898 62.83% 1,123 37.17% 3,021
v~t;·by-M·;11 31,285 74.34% 10,800 25.66% 42,085
State Board Of Equalization #2 33,1B3 73.57% 11,923 26.43% 45,106 ___ Tr"'lt~I
Cumulative
Board of Equalization {State} - 33,183 73.57% 11,923 26.43% 45,106 City of Santa Clara
Precinct 1,898 62.83% 1,123 37.17% 3,021
Vote by Mail 31,285 74.34% 10,800 25.66% 42,085
City of Santa Clara - Total 33,183 73.57% 11,923 26.43% 45,106 Cumulative
City- Total 33,183 73,57% 11,923 26.43% 45,106
Page: 1 of 34
Elector Group Counting Group
Total Precinct
Vote by Mail
Total
Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Voters Cast: 863,964 of 1,019,309 (84.76%)
Election Summary Report
General Election
Santa Clara
November 03, 2020
Official Final Results
Voters Cast
60,005
803,959
863,964
Registered Voters Turnout

5.89%

78.87%
1,019,309 84.76%
President and Vice President (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 863,964/ 1,019,309 84.76%
Candidate Party Total
JOSEPH R. BIDEN / KAMALA DEM 617,967 72.64% D. HARRIS
DONALD J. TRUMP/ REP 214,612 25.23% MICHAEL R. PENCE
JO JORGENSEN/ JEREMY LIB 9,131 1.07% "SPIKE" COHEN
HOWIE HAWKINS/ ANGELA GRN 4,040 0.47% NICOLE WALKER
ROQUE "ROCKY" DE LA
FUENTE GUERRA/ KANYE Al 2,623 0.31%

OMARIWEST
GLORIA LA RIVA/ SUNIL PF 2,149 0.25% FREEMAN
Write-in 219 0.03%
Total Votes 850,741
Total
BRIAN CARROLL/ AMAR WRITE-IN 151 0.02% PATEL
JESSE VENTURA/ CYNTHIA WRITE-IN 29 0.00% MCKINNEY

MARK CHARLES/ ADRIAN WRITE-IN
24 0.00% WALLACE

JOSEPH KISH ORE/ NORISSA WRITE-IN
8 0.00% SANTA CRUZ
BROCK PIERCE/ KARLA WRITE-IN 7 0.00% BALLARD
Exhibit B
12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Page: 2 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
17th Congressional (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 146 of 146 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 234,162 / 275,766 84.91%
Candidate Party Total
RO KHANNA DEM 158,483 71.54%
RITESH TANDON REP 63,044 28.46%
Total Votes 221,527
18th Congressional (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 204 of 204 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 292,226 / 332,297 87.94%
Candidate Party Total
ANNA G. ESHOO DEM 157,044 61.65%
RISHI KUMAR DEM 97,694 38.35%
Total Votes 254,738
19th Congressional (Vote for t)
Precincts Reported: 235 of 235 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 330,512 / 402,141 82.19%
Candidate Party Total
ZOE LOFGREN DEM 224,385 71.68%
JUSTIN JAMES AGUILERA REP 88,642 28.32%
Total Votes 313,027
20th Congressional (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 11 of 11 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 7,064 / 9,105 77.58%
Candidate Party Total
JIMMY PANETTA DEM 5,158 76.29%
JEFF GORMAN REP 1,603 23.71%
Total Votes 6,761
Page: 3 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
13th State Senate (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 96 of 96 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 166,187 / 189,361 87.76%
Candidate Party Total
JOSH BECKER DEM 118,799 76.20%
ALEXANDER GLEW REP 37,111 23.80%
Total Votes 155,910
15th State Senate (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 325 of 325 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 449,212 / 533,759 84.16%
Candidate Party Total
DAVE CORTESE DEM 212,207 54.78%
ANN M. RAVEL DEM 175,203 45.22%
Total Votes 387,410
17th State Senate (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 89 of 89 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 108,845 / 129,520 84.04%
Candidate Party Total
JOHN LAIRD DEM 66,543 64.74%
VICKI NOHRDEN REP 36,244 35.26%
Total Votes 102,787
24th Assembly (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 96 of 96 (1 DO.OD%)
Total
Times Cast 168,695 / 192,204 87.77%
Candidate Party Total
MARC BERMAN DEM 114,263 73.65%
PETER OHTAKI REP 40,871 26.35%
Total Votes 155,134
Page: 4 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
25th Assembly (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 109 of 109 (1 OD.OD%)
Total
Times Cast 139,989 / 167,588 83.53%
Candidate Party Total
ALEX LEE DEM 91,746 70.48%
BOB BRUNTON REP 38,429 29.52%
Total Votes 130,175
27th Assembly (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 103 of 103 (1 OD.OD%)
Total
Times Cast 189,410 / 238,740 79.34%
Candidate Party Total
ASH KALRA DEM 127,772 72.65%
G. BURT LANCASTER REP 48,112 27.35%
Total Votes 175,884
28th Assembly (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 190 of 190 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 253,506 / 289,585 87.54%
Candidate Party Total
EVAN LOW DEM 166,733 71.65%
CARLOS RAFAEL CRUZ REP 65,976 28.35%
Total Votes 232,709
29th Assembly (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 51 of 51 (1 OD.OD%)
Total
Times Cast 52,678 / 61,112 86.20%
Candidate Party Total
MARK STONE DEM 32,973 67.90%
SHOMIR BANERJEE REP 15,587 32.10%
Total Votes 48,560
Page: 5 of 34
30th Assembly (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 47 of 47 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 59,686 / 70,080 85.17%
Candidate Party Total
ROBERT RIVAS DEM 35,781 63.73%
GREGORY SWETT REP 20,365 36.27%
Total Votes 56,146
Judge - Superior Court Office #24 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 863,964 I 1,019,309 84.76%
Candidate Party Total
STUART J. SCOTT 544,151 100.00%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 544,151
Board of Education, Trustee Area #1, Governing Board (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 60 of 60 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate
GRACE H. MAH

MELISSA BATEN CASWELL
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
126,592 / 144,623 87.53%
Total
53,033 52.00%
48,947 48.00%
0 0.00%
101,980
Board of Education, Trustee Area #4, Governing Board (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 90 of 90 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 140,695 / 165,660 84.93%
Candidate Party Total
JOSEPHS. DI SALVO 53,488 47.21%
KETZAL GOMEZ 39,369 34.75%
LUCIA GARCIA 20,430 18.03%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 113,287
12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Page: 6 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Board of Education, Trustee Area #5, Governing Board (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 68 of 68 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 112,426 / 134,872 83.36%
Candidate Party Total
VICTORIA CHON 48,532 53.43%
ANNA E. SONG 42,296 46.57%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 90,828
San Benito Board of Education, District 1, Governing Board (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 1 of 1 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 81 / 103 78.64%
Candidate Party Total
MARY ANNE FILICE 30 45.45%
ELIZABET ZEPEDA GONZALEZ 25 37.88%
SHAWN P. HERRERA 11 16.67%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 66
Foothill-De Anza Community College District, Governing Board (Vote for 3) Precincts Reported: 118 of 118 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 205,036 I 233,262 87.90%
Candidate Party Total
GILBERT WONG 104,246 29.73%
PETER LANDSBERGER 98,460 28.08%
LAURA CASAS 96,029 27.38%
GOVIND TATACHARI 51,943 14.81%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 350,678
Gavilan Joint Community College District, Trustee Area #4, Governing Board (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

PATRICIA MONDRAGON

MARK DOVER
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
10,609 / 13,058 81.25%
Total
5,591 61.42%
3,512 38.58%
0 0.00%
9,103
Page: 7 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
San Jose-Evergreen Community College District, Trustee Area #1, Governing Board (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 28 of 28 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 53,618 / 64,477 83.16%
Candidate Party Total
BOB LIVENGOOD 24,896 58.78%
RUDY NASOL 17,458 41.22%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 42,354
San Jose- Evergreen Community College District, Trustee Area #7, Governing Board (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 31 of 31 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

OMAR TORRES

AIMEE ESCOBAR
ALICIA "ALI" VICTORIA

SAPIRMAN
JOSEPH SCOTTE HEADY­
PEREZ
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
41,302 / 54,957 75.15%
Total
15,567 47.52%
6,746 20.59%
6,592 20.12%
3,851 11.76%
0 0.00%
32,756
West Valley-Mission Community College District, Trustee Area #1, Governing Board (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 25,815 / 31,083 83.05%
Candidate Party Total
KARL WATANABE 10,297 51.66%
PETER KUO 9,634 48.34%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 19,931
Page: 8 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
West Valley-Mission Community College District, Trustee Area #2, Governing Board (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 16 of 16 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 25,710 / 30,348 84.72%
Candidate Party Total
ROBERT T. OWENS 13,457 68.78%
NICHOLAS SONG 6,109 31.22% STAMPOLIS
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 19,566
Gilroy Unified School District, Governing Board, Trustee Area 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 9 of 9 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate
MARKW.GOOD

NIRZA STARKS
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
5,670 / 6,522 86.94%
Total
3,033 65.09%
1,627 34.91%
0 0.00%
4,660
Gilroy Unified School District, Governing Board, Trustee Area 6 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 4 of 4 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 3,391 / 4,210 80.55%
Candidate Party Total
MELISSA NICHOLSON 1,952 68.56% AGUIRRE
BC DOYLE 895 31.44%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 2,847
Gilroy Unified School District, Governing Board, Trustee Area 3, Short Term (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 4 of 4 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 5,667 / 6,542 86.62%
Candidate Party Total
MICHELLE NELSON 3,194 64.54%
JONATHAN HURTADO 1,120 22.63%
KEVIN MOLLER 635 12.83%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 4,949
Page: 9 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Morgan Hill Unified School District, Trustee Area 5, Governing Board (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 10 of 10 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

IVAN ROSALES MONTES
PAM G. TORRISI
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
5,656 / 6,536 86.54%
Total
2,809 61.57%
1,753 38.43%
0 0.00%
4,562
Palo Alto Unified School District, Governing Board (Vote for 3) Precincts Reported: 18 of 18 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 43,600 I 49,670 87.78%
Candidate Party Total
JENNIFER DIBRIENZA 20,584 24.34%
JESSE FLETCHER LADOMIRAK 17,720 20.96%
TODD COLLINS 14,373 17.00%
KATIE CAUSEY 12,560 14.85%
KARNA NISEWANER 11,547 13.66%
MATTHEW NAGLE 7,772 9.19%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 84,556
San Jose Unified School District, Trustee Area #1, Governing Board (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 8 of 8 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 16,334 / 21,606 75.60%
Candidate Party Total
TERESA CASTELLANOS 10,545 79.69%
ANTHONY MACIAS 2,687 20.31%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 13,232
Page: 10 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
San Jose Unified School District, Trustee Area #3, Governing Board (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 18 of 18 (100.00%}
Times Cast
Candidate

CARLA DRINA COLLINS

TOMARA HALL

KRISTEN BROWN

CAROL MYERS
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
27,519 / 31,925 86.20%
Total
7,690 35.46%
6,027 27.79%
4,754 21.92%
3,215 14.83%
0 0.00%
21,686
Santa Clara Unified School District, Trustee Area #2, Governing Board (Vote for 2)
Precincts Reported: 38 of 38 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 62,651 / 74,425 84.18%
Candidate Party Total
BONNIE LIEBERMAN 28,797 41.36%
ALBERT GONZALEZ 27,009 38.79%
MARK RICHARDSON 13,818 19.85%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 69,624
Santa Clara Unified School District, Trustee Area #3, Governing Board (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 38 of 38 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 62,651 /74,425 84.18%
Candidate Party Total
MICHELE RYAN 25,810 53.50%
ANDREW KNAACK 22,437 46.50%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 48,247
Campbell Union High School District, Governing Board, Trustee Area 4 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 23 of 23 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 21,451 / 25,292 84.81%
Candidate Party Total
LINDA GOYTIA 11,205 65.61%
BASIL SALEH 5,873 34.39%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 17,078
Page: 11 of 34
East Side Union High School District, Governing Board (Vote for 2) Precincts Reported: 147 of 147 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

PATTIE CORTESE

BRYAN DO

PATRICIA MARTINEZ-ROACH

CHRYSTINE VILLARREAL
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
227,154 / 279,530 81.26%
Total
96,334 34.40%
68,125 24.33%
64,143 22.90%
51,458 18.37%
0 0.00%
280,060
12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District, Governing Board (Vote for 2)
Precincts Reported: 26 of 26 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 57,647 / 64,772 89.00%
Candidate Party Total
SANJAY DAVE 25,650 34.96%
PHIL FAILLACE 24,562 33.47%
LAURA TEKSLER 23,168 31.57%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 73,380
Alum Rock Union School District, Governing Board (Vote for 2) Precincts Reported: 29 of 29 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

CORINA HERRERA-LOERA

SCOTT HUNG PHAM

BRENDA PINAL ZENDEJAS

DOLORES MARQUEZ

JOE CORONA
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
38,491 / 50,234 76.62%
Total
18,431 37.07%
8,959 18.02%
8,735 17.57%
7,360 14.80%
6,238 12.55%
0 0.00%
49,723
Page: 12 of 34
Berryessa Union School District, Governing Board (Vote for 2) Precincts Reported: 25 of 25 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 37,296 I 44,634 83.56%
Candidate Party Total
KHOA NGUYEN 22,718 55.01%
JAi SRINIVASAN 10,138 24.55%
RICHARD I. CLASPILL 8,444 20.45%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 41,300
Cupertino Union School District, Governing Board (Vote for 2) Precincts Reported: 46 of 46 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

SYLVIA LEONG

PHYLLIS VOGEL

SUDHA KASAMSETTY

WILLIAM FLUEWELLING
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
69,140 / 78,340 88.26%
Total
34,712 37.86%
24,466 26.69%
22,139 24.15%
10,360 11.30%
0 0.00%
91,677
Evergreen School District, Governing Board (Vote for 2) Precincts Reported: 22 of 22 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 50,762 / 60,295 84.19%
Candidate Party Total
LEILA WELCH 24,505 38.38%
PATTI ANDRADE 14,703 23.03%
MADAN BELLAM 13,262 20.77%
TOM HUFF 11,381 17.82%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 63,851
12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Page: 13 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Loma Prieta Joint Union School District, Governing Board (Vote for 2) Precincts Reported: 5 of 5 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 676 / 758 89.18%
Candidate Party Total
ALEXANDRA HALL · 307 34.69%
ERIN ASHEGHIAN 305 34.46%
STACY KISSNER 273 30.85%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 885
Luther Burbank School District, Governing Board, Full Term (Vote for 2) Precincts Reported: 3 of 3 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 1,528 / 1,942 78.68%
Candidate Party Total
JEAN TSENG 720 42.50%
MICHAEL ROWE 542 32.00%
MARKS. LEMUCCHI 432 25.50%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 1,694
Luther Burbank School District, Governing Board, Short Term (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 3 of 3 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 1,528 / 1,942 78.68%
Candidate Party Total
JESUS OMAR SALAZAR 872 74.72%
ANTONIO PEREZ 295 25.28%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 1,167
Moreland School District, Governing Board, Trustee Area 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 2 of 2 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 4,665 / 5,398 86.42%
Candidate Party Total
SHELLY HONG 2,142 55.28%
JULIE REYNOLDS-GRABBE 1,733 44.72%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 3,875
Page: 14 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Mountain View Whisman School District, Governing Board (Vote for 3) Precincts Reported: 11 of 11 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

LAURA RAMIREZ BERMAN

LAURA BLAKELY

CHRISTOPHER KENT CHIANG

PATRICK NESCHLEBA

MANNY VELASCO
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
30,816/ 35,220 87.50%
Total
17,454 30.69%
13,448 23.65%
13,433 23.62%
7,959 14.00%
4,571 8.04%
0 0.00%
56,865
Mount Pleasant School District, Governing Board (Vote for 2) Precincts Reported: 13 of 13 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

MELISSA GOT-LOPEZ

DEREK GRASTY
ANTONIO PEREZ, JR.

WENDY NICHOLS
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
9,199 / 11,512 79.91%
Total
4,046 35.84%
2,797 24.78%
2,367 20.97%
2,078 18.41%
0 0.00%
11,288
Oak Grove School District, Trustee Area #1, Governing Board (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 9,339 I 11,336 82.38%
Candidate Party Total
BEIJA GONZALEZ 3,634 48.73%
ALLIE HUGHES 2,422 32.48%
TIM TOM 1,401 18.79%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 7,457
Page: 15 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Oak Grove School District, Trustee Area #4, Governing Board (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 7 of 7 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

CARLA HERNANDEZ

JOHN MACKEY
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
11,053 / 12,645 87.41%
Total
6,527 74.00%
2,293 26.00%
0 0.00%
8,820
Orchard School District, Governing Board (Vote for 2)
Precincts Reported: 7 of 7 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 5,877 / 7,231 81.28%
Candidate Party Total
KARL RAYMOND JACOBSON 1,984 30.29%
DIANA NAZARI 1,729 26.40%
KATHERINE KASOLAS 1,431 21.85%
JOSEPH ZANONE 1,406 21.47%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 6,550
Saratoga Union School District, Governing Board (Vote for 2) Precincts Reported: 22 of 22 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 13,840 I 15,460 89.52%
Candidate Party Total
MELISSA STANIS 4,664 25.04%
SCOTT ADLER 4,207 22.59%
SUNITA VERMA 4,031 21.64%
AZADEH H. WEBER 3,062 16.44%
CECILE V. COHEN- 2,660 14.28% JONATHAN
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 18,624
Page: 16 of 34
County Supervisor, District 3 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 119 of 119 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 172,077 I 205,127 83.89%
Candidate Party Total
OTTO LEE 85,663 60.49%
KANSEN CHU 55,946 39.51%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 141,609
City of Campbell, Council Member, District 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 3 of 3 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 3,964 / 4,627 85.67%
Candidate Party Total
SUSAN M. LANDRY 1,380 40.20%
ANNE SOUZA 1,175 34.23%
TERRY HINES 878 25.58%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 3,433
City of Campbell, Council Member, District 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 3 of 3 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 4,945 I 5,620 87.99%
Candidate Party Total
SERGIO LOPEZ 2,264 52.66%
CAROL HOFFMAN 2,035 47.34%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 4,299
City of Cupertino, Council Member (Vote for 2)
Precincts Reported: 16 of 16 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

HUNG WEI

KITTY MOORE

STEVEN SCHARF
JOSEPH "J.R." FRUEN

CHARLENE SHULIEN LEE
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
29,166 / 33,233 87.76%
Total
11,513 25.69%
10,893 24.30%
9,567 21.35%
9,534 21.27%
3,312 7.39%
0 0.00%
44,819
12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Page: 17 of 34
City of Gilroy, Mayor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 16 of 16 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 25,432 / 30,693 82.86%
Candidate Party Total
MARIE BLANKLEY 16,046 68.86%
REID LERNER 7,256 31.14%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 23,302
City of Gilroy, Council Member (Vote for 3)
Precincts Reported: 16 of 16 (100.00%}
Times Cast
Candidate

ZACH HILTON
FRED M. TOVAR

REBECA ARMENDARIZ

CAROL MARQUES

DANNY MITCHELL
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
25,432 / 30,693 82.86%
Total
12,814 25.17%
11,808 23.19%
10,375 20.38%
8,372 16.44%
7,543 14.82%
0 0.00%
50,912
City of Los Altos, Council Member (Vote for 3)
Precincts Reported: 9 of 9 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 20,020 / 22,101 90.58%
Candidate Party Total
SALLY MEADOWS 9,630 21.01%
LYNETTE LEE ENG 9,042 19.73%
JONATHAN D. WEINBERG 8,139 17.76%
KUUEET KALKAT 7,800 17.02%
SCOTT SPIELMAN 5,997 13.08%
TERRI COUTURE 3,976 8.68%
ALEX RUBASHEVSKY 1,248 2.72%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 45,832
12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Page: 18 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Town of Los Altos Hills, Council Member (Vote for 3)
Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 5,922 / 6,528 90.72%
Candidate Party Total
LINDA G. SWAN 2,617 20.76%
STANLEY Q. MOK 2,532 20.09%
LISA H. SCHMIDT 2,495 19.79%
JAY T. SUTARIA 2,494 19.79%
RAJ REDDY 2,467 19.57%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 12,605
Town of Los Gatos, Council Member, Full Term (Vote for 2) Precincts Reported: 12 of 12 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 20,130 / 22,607 89.04%
Candidate Party Total
MARIA RISTOW 7,244 25.06%
MATTHEW HUDES 6,887 23.82%
HEIDI OWENS 6,402 22.15%
D. MICHAEL KANE 5,164 17.86%
LARRY MAGGIO 3,211 11.11%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 28,908
Town of Los Gatos, Council Member, Short Term (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 12 of 12 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 20, 130 / 22,607 89.04%
Candidate Party Total
MARY BADAME 10,221 68.04%
ROB STEPHENSON 4,800 31.96%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 15,021
Page: 19 of 34
City of Milpitas, Mayor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 10 of 1 O (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 30,595 / 36,665 83.44%
Candidate Party Total
RICH TRAN 19,144 68.50%
VOLTAIRE S. MONTEMAYOR 4,699 16.81%
PETE "PRIMO" MCHUGH 4,103 14.68%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 27,946
City of Milpitas, Council Member (Vote for 2)
Precincts Reported: 10 of 10 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

ANTHONY PHAN

EVELYN CHUA

BOB NUNEZ

TIFFANY VUONG

JULIAN JOSE NOOL HILARIO,
JR.

SURAJ "SUN"

VI SW ANA THAN

ROBERT MARINI
Write-in
Total Votes

DEMETRESS MORRIS
Party

WRITE-IN
Total
30,595 / 36,665 83.44%
Total
9,224
8,762
7,576
7,295
5,626
5,538
2,528
299
46,848
Total
299

19.69%

18.70%

16.17%

15.57%

12.01%

11.82%

5.40%

0.64%

0.64%
City of Monte Sereno, Council Member (Vote for 2)
Precincts Reported: 4 of 4 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 2,493 / 2,735 91.15%
Candidate Party Total
ROWENA TURNER 1,138 31.89%
BRYAN MEKECHUK 1,016 28.47%
BURTON CRAIG 969 27.15%
DANIEL LABOUVE 446 12.50%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 3,569
12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Page: 20 of 34
City of Morgan Hill, Mayor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 11 of 11 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

RICH CONSTANTINE
Write-in
Total Votes

STEVE CHAPPELL
Party

WRITE-IN
Total
24,416 / 28,009 87.17%
Total
16,753
1,845
18,598
Total
1,845

90.08%

9.92%

9.92%
City of Morgan Hill, Council Member, District A (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 3 of 3 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 5,595 / 6,446 86.80%
Candidate Party Total
GINO BORGIOLI 2,082 41.75%
LARRY CARR 1,721 34.51%
JULIE D. RAIA 1,184 23.74%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 4,987
City of Morgan Hill, Council Member, District C (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 3 of 3 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 5,494 / 6,431 85.43%
Candidate Party Total
RENE ANGELO SPRING 3,159 68.70%
JUAN MIGUEL MUNOZ- 1,439 31.30% MORRIS
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 4,598
12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Page: 21 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
City of Mountain View, Council Member (Vote for 4)
Precincts Reported: 11 of 11 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 35,317 / 40,380 87.46%
Candidate Party Total
MARGARET ABE-KOGA 17,125 16.67%
SALLY J. LIEBER 14,276 13.90%
LISA MA TICHAK 12,955 12.61%
PAT SHOWALTER 12,060 11.74%
ALEX NUNEZ 12,002 11.68%
JOSE GUTIERREZ 10,185 9.91%
LEONARD "LENNY" SIEGEL 9,972 9.71%
JOHN LASHLEE 7,696 7.49%
PAUL ROALES 6,460 6.29%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 102,731
City of Palo Alto, Council Member (Vote for 4)
Precincts Reported: 16 of 16 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 38,081 I 43,015 88.53%
Candidate Party Total
PATRICK BURT 14,353 13.35%
LYDIA KOU 13,424 12.49%
GREG LIN TANAKA 12,920 12.02%
GREER STONE 12,005 11.17%
ED LAUING 11,163 10.38%
RAVEN MALONE 10,804 10.05%
STEVEN LEE 10,299 9.58%
CAROLYN TEMPLETON 9,912 9.22%
REBECCA EISENBERG 7,793 7.25%
AJITVARMA 4,845 4.51%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 107,518
City of San Jose, District Council Member, # 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 21 of 21 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 44,951 / 54,450 82.55%
Candidate Party Total
DAVID COHEN 20,030 51.33%
LAN DIEP 18,993 48.67%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 39,023
Page: 22 of 34
City of San Jose, District Council Member,# 6 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 46 of 46 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate
DEVORA "DEV" DAVIS

JAKE TONKEL
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
50,519 / 58,990 85.64%
Total
24,340 53.87%
20,840 46.13%
0 0.00%
45,180
City of Santa Clara, Member, City Council, District 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 2 of 2 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 6,633 / 7,868 84.30%
Candidate Party Total
KATHY WATANABE 3,121 53.52%
HARBIR K. BHATIA 2,710 46.48%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 5,831
City of Santa Clara, Member, City Council, District 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 4 of 4 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 7,936 / 9,469 83.81%
Candidate Party Total
KEVIN NARA PARK 3,873 57.24%
TERESA O'NEILL 2,893 42.76%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 6,766
City of Santa Clara, Member, City Council, District 5 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

SUDS JAIN

BOB O'KEEFE
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
8,049 I 9,61 o 83.76%
Total
4,335 60.61%
2,817 39.39%
0 0.00%
7,152
12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Page: 23 of 34
City of Santa Clara, Member, City Council, District 6 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 8 of 8 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 10,150/11,747 86.41%
Candidate Party Total
ANTHONY J. BECKER 3,452 40.20%
ROBERT L. MEZZETTI, II 3,157 36.76%
GAUTAM "GARY" BARVE 1,979 23.04%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 8,588
City of Santa Clara, City Clerk (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 30 of 30 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 49,286 I 58,593 84.12%
Candidate Party Total
HOSAM HAGGAG 33,548 100.00%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 33,548
City of Santa Clara, Chief of Police (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 30 of 30 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 49,286 I 58,593 84.12%
Candidate Party Total
PAT NIKOLAI 33,880 100.00%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 33,880
City of Saratoga, Council Member (Vote for 2)
Precincts Reported: 16 of 16 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

TINA WALIA

KOOKIE FITZSIMMONS

RENEE PAQUIER

BELAL AFTAB

DOUG CASE

JOHN FITZPATRICK
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
20,404 I 22,885 89.16%
Total
7,181 23.88%
5,694 18.94%
4,546 15.12%
4,525 15.05%
4,131 13.74%
3,992 13.28%
0 0.00%
30,069
12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Page: 24 of 34
City of Sunnyvale, Mayor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 44 of 44 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

LARRY KLEIN

NANCY SMITH
MICHAELS. GOLDMAN
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
59,403 / 69,204
Total
18,438
17,240
15,461
0 51,139

85.84%

36.05%

33.71%

30.23%

0.00%
City of Sunnyvale, Council Member, District 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 9,605 / 11,166 86.02%
Candidate Party Total
ALYSA CISNEROS 4,242 53.66%
JOSH GROSSMAN 2,596 32.84%
HINA SIDDIQUI 1,067 13.50%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 7,905
City of Sunnyvale, Council Member, District 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 9,861 / 11,544 85.42%
Candidate Party Total
RUSS MELTON 5,670 71.26%
PAUL JOSEPH LESEVIC- 2,287 28.74% CAMPOS
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 7,957
City of Sunnyvale, Council Member, District 6 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 7 of 7 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 10,174/ 12,194 83.43%
Candidate Party Total
OMAR DIN 3,473 42.91%
CHARLOTTE THORNTON 2,653 32.78%
LEIA MEHLMAN 1,967 24.30%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 8,093
12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Page: 25 of 34
Cupertino Sanitary, Director (Vote for 3)
Precincts Reported: 25 of 25 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 31,178/ 35,477 87.88%
Candidate Party Total
ANGELA CHEN 16,740 34.66%
WILLIAM A. "BILL" 11,731 24.29% BOSWORTH
JOHN M. GATTO 11,164 23.12%
JOYCE STANFORD 8,658 17.93%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 48,293
El Camino Healthcare, Director (Vote for 3)
Precincts Reported: 53 of 53 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Candidate

CAROL ANN SOMERSILLE

JOHN ZOGLIN
JULIA E. MILLER

JANE CHEN LOMBARD

MEGHAN FRALEY
Write-in
Total Votes
Party
Total
101,338 / 115,831 87.49%
Total
38,718 21.23%
38,520 21.12%
38,454 21.09%
34,538 18.94%
32,133 17.62%
0 0.00%
182,363
Midpeninsula Open Space, Ward 3, Director (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 31 of 31 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 42,089 I 49,557 84.93%
Candidate Party Total
JED CYR 21,436 69.30%
ED RIFFLE 9,495 30.70%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 30,931
12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Page: 26 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority, District 1, Director (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 115 of 115 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 104,854 / 120,693 86.88%
Candidate Party Total
ALEX KENNETT 44,810 55.04%
ROBERT HOWELL 36,598 44.96%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 81,408
Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority, District 4, Director (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 60 of 60 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 91,239 / 105,615 86.39%
Candidate Party Total
DORSEY MOORE 48,517 72.75%
JANIS JOYCE HALL 18,169 27.25%
Write-in 0 0.00%
Total Votes 66,686
State Proposition 14 - Initiative Statute - Stem Cell Research Bonds (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 860,608 I 1,019,309 84.43%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 455,169 56.01%
No 357,516 43.99%
Total Votes 812,685
State Proposition 15 - Constitutional Amendment - Public School Funding (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 860,608 I 1,019,309 84.43%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 459,613 55.59%
No 367,231 44.41%
Total Votes 826,844
Page: 27 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
State Proposition 16 - Constitutional Amendment - Diversity Policies (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 860,608 I 1,019,309 84.43%
Candidate Party Total
No 430,002 52.67%
Yes 386,465 47.33%
Total Votes 816,467
State Proposition 17 - Constitutional Amendment - Voting Rights After Prison Term (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 860,608 / 1,019,309 84.43%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 531,219 64.47%
No 292,760 35.53%
Total Votes 823,979
State Proposition 18 - Constitutional Amendment - Voting Rights Eligibility (Votefor 1)
Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 860,608 I 1,019,309 84.43%
Candidate Party Total
No 427,521 51.84%
Yes 397,144 48.16%
Total Votes 824,665
State Proposition 19 - Constitutional Amendment - Property Tax Rules (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 860,608 I 1,019,309 84.43%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 448,213 55.62%
No 357,674 44.38%
Total Votes 805,887
Page: 28 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
State Proposition 20 - Initiative Statute - Parole Restriction (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 860,486 I 1,019,309 84.42%
Candidate Party Total
No 512,943 63.66%
Yes 292,832 36.34%
Total Votes 805,775
State Proposition 21 - Initiative Statute - Rent Control (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 860,486 I 1,019,309 84.42%
Candidate Party Total
No 463,985 57.00%
Yes 350,065 43.00%
Total Votes 814,050
State Proposition 22 - Initiative Statute - Delivery Companies Employee Benefits (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 860,486 I 1,019,309 84.42%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 437,271 53.16%
No 385,247 46.84%
Total Votes 822,518
State Proposition 23 - Initiative Statute - Dialysis Treatment (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 860,486 I 1,019,309 84.42%
Candidate Party Total
No 491,885 60.65%
Yes 319,139 39.35%
Total Votes 811,024
Page: 29 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
State Proposition 24 - Initiative Statute - Consumer Privacy Law Amendment (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 860,486 I 1,019,309 84.42%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 475,444 58.66%
No 335,079 41.34%
Total Votes 810,523
State Proposition 25 - Referendum - Money Bail System Replacement (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 860,486 / 1,019,309 84.42%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 422,364 52.58%
No 380,969 47.42%
Total Votes 803,333
Measure A - Town of Los Gatos, Finance Commission (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 12 of 12 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 20,121 / 22,607 89.00%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 9,452 56.63%
No 7,238 43.37%
Total Votes 16,690
Measure B - Town of Los Gatos, Term Limits (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 12 of 12 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 20, 121 / 22,607 89.00%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 14,561 82.41%
No 3,107 17.59%
Total Votes 17,668
Page: 30 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Measure C - City of Mountain View, Municipal Code Amendment (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 11 of 11 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 35,328 / 40,380 87.49%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 18,455 56.59%
No 14,159 43.41%
Total Votes 32,614
Measure E - City of Santa Clara, Transient Occupancy Tax (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 30 of 30 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 49,283 / 58,593 84.11%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 33,183 73.57%
No 11,923 26.43%
Total Votes 45,106
Measure F- City of Milpitas, Use Tax (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 10 of 10 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 30,576 / 36,665 83.39%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 17,041 60.36%
No 11,192 39.64%
Total Votes 28,233
Measure G - City of San Jose, Charter Amendment (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 268 of 268 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 437,432 I 529,599 82.60%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 302,315 77.25%
No 89,056 22.75%
Total Votes 391,371
Page: 31 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Measure H - City of San Jose, Cardroom Tax (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 268 of 268 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 437,432 I 529,599 82.60%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 285,756 72.63%
No 107,682 27.37%
Total Votes 393,438
Measure I - San Jose - Evergreen Community College District, Parcel Tax (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 248 of 248 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 382,097 I 466,161 81.97%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 210,213 61.82%
No 129,847 38.18%
Total Votes 340,060
Measure J - San Jose - Evergreen Community College District, School Bonds (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 248 of 248 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 382,097 I 466,161 81.97%
Candidate Party Total
Bonds Yes 179,139 53.09%
Bonds No 158,283 46.91%
Total Votes 337,422
Measure K - Franklin-McKinley School District, Parcel Tax (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 19 of 19 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 33,476 I 43,421 77.10%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 22,012 70.61%
No 9,164 29.39%
Total Votes 31,176
Page: 32 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Measure L - Campbell Union High School District, Parcel Tax (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 82 of 82 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 110,956 / 128,839 86.12%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 63,722 61.82%
No 39,359 38.18%
Total Votes 103,081
Measure M - Fremont Union High School District, Parcel Tax (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 72 of 72 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 103,000 I 118,631 86.82%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 69,991 73.67%
No 25,013 26.33%
Total Votes 95,004
Measure N - Loma Prieta Joint Union School District, Parcel Tax (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 5 of 5 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 675 / 758 89.05%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 455 70.54%
No 190 29.46%
Total Votes 645
Measure O - Palo Alto Unified School District, Parcel Tax (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 18 of 18 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 43,343 I 49,670 87.26%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 31,194 77.44%
No 9,088 22.56%
Total Votes 40,282
Page: 33 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Measure P - Evergreen Elementary School District, School Bonds (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 22 of 22 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 50,485 / 60,295 83.73%
Candidate Party Total
Bonds Yes 26,413 56.20%
Bonds No 20,588 43.80%
Total Votes 47,001
Measure Q - Mount Pleasant Elementary School District, School Bonds (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 13 of 13 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 9,145 / 11,512 79.44%
Candidate Party Total
Bonds Yes 5,621 65.73%
Bonds No 2,931 34.27%
Total Votes 8,552
Measure R - Cambrian School District, School Bonds (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 18 of 18 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 16,257 / 18,577 87.51%
Candidate Party Total
Bonds Yes 9,235 61.17%
Bonds No 5,862 38.83%
Total Votes 15,097
Measure S - Santa Clara Valley Water District, Parcel Tax (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 859,179 / 1,019,309 84.29%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 609,100 75.06%
No 202,399 24.94%
Total Votes 811,499
Page: 34 of 34 12/1/2020 5:05:13 PM
Measure T - Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority, Parcel Tax (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 417 of 417 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 593,361 / 714,396 83.06%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 455,032 81.35%
No 104,288 18.65%
Total Votes 559,320
Measure RR - Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Cal train, Sales Tax (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 596 of 596 (100.00%)
Total
Times Cast 859,179 / 1,019,309 84.29%
Candidate Party Total
Yes 528,238 66.13%
No 270,494 33.87%
Total Votes 798,732
1500 Warburton Avenue ● Santa Clara, CA 95050 ● Phone: 408-615-2200 ● Fax: 408-241-6771 ● www.SantaClaraCA.gov Mayor
Lisa M. Gillmor
Councilmembers
Kathy Watanabe, District 1
Raj Chahal, District 2
Karen Hardy, District 3
Kevin Park, District 4
Suds Jain, District 5
Anthony J. Becker, District 6
January 11, 2022
Santa Clara City Council
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Dear City Council:

On January 15, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 19-8650, pursuant to Section 705 of the City Charter, to establish a procedure for the selection of Vice Mayor (Mayor Pro Tempore) and Chaplain for a calendar year.

Per the resolution, the City Council shall select a Vice Mayor by a majority vote of a quorum of the City Council, with the selection scheduled to take place at a City Council meeting in the beginning of each calendar year. The resolution also states that the Vice Mayor shall be the Councilmember with the highest seniority in consecutive years on the Council, who has not previously served as Vice Mayor and that the Chaplain shall be served by the most recent outgoing Vice Mayor. Per the procedure established by Resolution No. 19 -8650, Councilmember Sudhanshu “Suds” Jain is eligible to serve as Vice Mayor.

I would like to recommend that the City Council appoint Councilmember Suds Jain to the position of Vice Mayor for approximately one year until the appointment of successor Vice Mayor in January 2022. Councilmember Suds Jain first became involved with the City on its Climate Action Plan, later served on the Planning Commission, and was elected to the Santa Clara City Council in November 2020 . With his experience serving the City in multiple capacities, I am confident that he will capably fulfill the duties of Vice Mayor.

Sincerely,
Lisa M. Gillmor
Mayor
City of Santa Clara
•
: >­: ,_ . -:o • •
• •••••••••
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-1702 Agenda Date: 1/11/2022

REPORT TO STADIUM AUTHORITY BOARD

SUBJECT
Request from Stadium Manager to Execute Agreements with R. Brothers Painting Inc. for Rust Prevention Mitigation CapEx Project; Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. for Gold Lot 4 and 5 Lighting CapEx Project and Approve Related Budget Amendment; and Ample Electric, Inc. for Mechanical and Electrical Closet Lighting CapEx Project; and Approve Budget Amendment Related to Stadium Insulation CapEx Project

BOARD PILLAR
Ensure Compliance with Measure J and Manage Levi’s Stadium

DISCUSSION
Between November 30 and December 2, 2021, the Stadium Manager submitted Recommendation for Award memos (Attachment 1-3) and a Recommendation for Budget Augmentation (Attachment 4), along with supporting procurement documentation, to request approval from the Stadium Authority Board for the following:

Rust Prevention Mitigation CapEx Project

1. Award a one-time agreement to R. Brothers Painting Inc., in the amount of $17,223 to prepare and paint the existing steel structure along the 300 level concourse of Levi’s Stadium;

2. Authorize Stadium Manager to execute any and all documents associated with, and necessary for the award, completion, and acceptance of this Project; and

3. Authorize Stadium Manager to execute change orders up to approximately 10% of the contract cost, or $1,722, for a total not to exceed amount of $18,945.

The Stadium Authority FY 2021/22 CapEx Budget includes $94,500 for the Rust Prevention Mitigation line item.

Mechanical and Electrical Closet Lighting CapEx Project

1. Award a one-time agreement to Ample Electrical, Inc. in the amount of $101,780 for replacement of existing light fixtures in the Levi’s Stadium Electrical Rooms and Telecom Rooms with new LED light fixtures that will provide high efficiency, low maintenance light fixtures with a long-term lifecycle;

2. Authorize Stadium Manager to execute any and all documents associated with, and necessary for the award, completion, and acceptance of this Project; and

3. Authorize Stadium Manager to execute change orders up to 10% of the contract cost, or $10,178, for a total not to exceed amount of $111,958.

City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/5/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
22-1702 Agenda Date: 1/11/2022
The Stadium Authority FY 2021/22 CapEx Budget includes $157,500 for the Mechanical and Electrical Closet Lighting line item. The Stadium Manager stated in their Recommendation for Award that some of the 260 anticipated lighting fixtures would be located in Tenant Exclusive Areas, and pursuant to the Stadium Lease, StadCo as the Tenant would pay for those fixtures and the Stadium Authority would be charged for the remainder. The costs of the parties will be allocated based on the number of fixtures, which is anticipated to cost StadCo approximately $19,573 ($101,780 x 50/260 lighting fixtures) and Stadium Authority approximately $82,207 ($101,780 x 210/260 lighting fixtures).

Gold Lot 4 and 5 Lighting CapEx Project

1. Award a one-time agreement to Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc., in the amount of $59,145 for removal and disposal of existing wall mounted luminaire fixtures, and furnishing and installation of new wall mounted luminaires at Levi’s Stadium;

2. Authorize Stadium Manager to execute any and all documents associated with, and necessary for the award, completion, and acceptance of this Project; and

3. Authorize Stadium Manager to execute change orders up to approximately 10% of the contract cost, or $5,914, for a total not to exceed amount of $65,059.

The Stadium Authority FY 2021/22 CapEx Budget includes $52,500 for the Gold Lot 4 and 5 Lighting line item. A budget amendment would be required to approve this request.

Budget Amendment Related to Stadium Insulation CapEx Project

1. Approve a budget amendment to increase the budget amount for the Stadium Insulation Project by $360,000 in the FY 2021/22 CapEx Budget.

The Stadium Authority FY 2021/22 CapEx Budget includes $157,500 for the Stadium Insulation line item. If approved, the Stadium Manager’s request would increase this line item to $517,500.

The Stadium Manager’s Recommendation for Award memos describes the Request for Bids processes that were implemented for the first three CapEx projects. The Stadium Manager’s Recommendation for Budget Augmentation describes their justification for a budget increase for the Stadium Insulation CapEx project. The Stadium Authority FY 2021/22 CapEx Budget is attached for reference and includes the project descriptions (Attachment 5).

Subsequent correspondence was exchanged between Stadium Authority staff and the Stadium Manager about the requests as documented in Attachment 6.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Stadium Manager’s Recommendation for Award: Rust Prevention Mitigation CapEx Project

2. Stadium Manager’s Recommendation for Award: Mechanical and Electrical Closet Lighting CapEx Project

3. Stadium Manager’s Recommendation for Award: Gold Lot 4 and 5 Lighting CapEx Project

4. Stadium Manager’s Recommendation for Budget Augmentation: Stadium Insulation CapEx Project

5. CapEx Portion of Stadium Authority FY 2021/22 Budget

6. Follow Up Responses Submitted by Stadium Manager

7. Agreement with R. Brothers Painting Inc.

8. Agreement with Ample Electrical, Inc.

City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/5/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
22-1702 Agenda Date: 1/11/2022

9. Agreement with Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc.

City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/5/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™

1 Date: November 29, 2021

To: Jim Mercurio
Executive Vice President & General Manager

From: Jenti Vandertuig
Procurement Director

Subject: Recommendation for Award RF B FY21-0017 Levi’s Stadium Rust Protection Mitigation Project

Recommendation

1. Recommend approval and award of a one-time agreement to R. Brothers Painting Inc., in the amount of $17,223 to prepare and paint the existing steel structure along the 300 level concourse of Levi’s Stadium;

2. Authorize Stadium Manager to execute any and all documents associated with, and necessary for the award, completion, and acceptance of this Project; and

3. Authorize Stadium Manager to execute change orders up to approximately 10% of the contract cost, or $1,722.30, for a total not to exceed amount of $18,945.30.

Solicitation Process
Forty Niners Stadium Management Company LLC (“Stadium Manager”) has a need to prepare and paint the existing steel structure along the 300 level concourse of the Levi’s Stadium (“Stadium”). Rust stains are beginning to show on the existing steel at this location and the stadium railings, beams, and other steel areas need rust prevention and coating. Implementation of rust prevention measures was approved as part of the FY21/22 Santa Clara Stadium Authority (“SCSA”) Capital Expenditures budget.

On October 27, 2021, Stadium Manager issued a Request for Bids (RFB) FY21-0017 to prepare and paint the existing steel structure including railings, beams, and other steel areas along the 300 level concourse of the Stadium to improve the aesthetic appearance and extend the useful life of the facility.

Stadium Manager published the RFB on Bonfire Interactive, Stadium Manager’s eProcurement portal https://49ers.bonfirehub.com/portal/. In addition to inviting a list of suppliers on our established supplier list, Stadium Manager also selected suppliers ,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,*Ā$!(+&$-.Ȁ&+'&Ȁ$)&#Ȁ+%"-Ȁ%$,'&+%%( &%

STADIUM

FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
2 registered on the portal with specific commodity codes offering infrastructure painting systems.

On November 3, 2021, Stadium Manager published the Notice Inviting Bids related to this project in the San Jose Mercury News publication. Notices were also emailed on October 27, 2021 to the Builders’ Exchange of Santa Clara County and Minority Business Consortium to communicate with their respective member communities.

While the RFB allowed for substitutions where permissible, Stadium Manager determined the need to specify Sherwin-Williams as the sole paint brand for painting the exterior of the Stadium and identified the following specifications in the RFB:

“Stadium Manager has made findings designating the following materials, methods or services by specified brand or trade names, which must be used for the Project:

1. Pre-primer coat shall be Sher win-Williams 100501824 – CORRVERTER.

2. Primer shall be Sherwin-Williams I58W00020 – MAC 5000 WHT 1G.

3. Polyurethane Sealant shall be Sherwi n-Williams LX41L4143 – LOXON 1SL White

28. 4. Finish shall be Sherwin-Williams B 66T00354 – Sher-Cryl HPA High Performance Acrylic Semi-Gloss Coating Ultradeep/Clear Tint Base.

Stadium Manager finds the foregoing materials, methods or services are required for the Project because Sherwin-Williams is the original paint brand selected for exterior finishes at the Stadium. In order to ensure compatibili ty related to color, finish and matching of the existing exterior, continued use of Sher win Williams brand and associated products designated by Sherwin Williams is warranted.”
Stadium Manager held a non-mandatory pre-bid conference on November 3, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. (PT) to provide an overview of the project and answer any questions from prospective bidders. The RFB provided prospective bidders the option to schedule on- site visits to the Stadium and to request substitutions where permissible with specific deadlines for each of these options.

Electronic bid submissions via the eProcurement portal were due on or before November 22, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. (PT). One bid was received on or before the closing due date and time from the following firm:

1. R. Brothers Painting, Inc. – Base bid at $14,566 and Alternate No. 1 at $17,223

A bidder contacted the Procurement Lead less than two hours of the bid closing time to mention that he was not aware that a bid bond was required. He later emailed the bid ,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,*Ā$!(+&$-.Ȁ&+'&Ȁ$)&#Ȁ+%"-Ȁ%$,'&+%%( &%

3 response directly to the Procurement Lead without the bid bond. The bid submission did not adhere to the RFB requirements and therefore, was not considered.

Public Bid Opening
A public bid opening was held on November 22, 2021 at 4:00 p.m. (PT). The RFB provided the public bid opening webcast information including a meeting ID and password for bidders to log on via Zoom to attend. Several bidders were in attendance.

Stadium Manager announced the receipt of one bid on or before the due date and time, announced the name of each bidder and the bid amount. R. Brothers Painting, Inc. was declared the apparent low bidder with a base bid amount of $14,566.

Evaluation of Apparent Low Bidder
Stadium Manager reviewed the bid from R. Brothers Painting, Inc. and determined the bid to be responsive and responsible. The review verified that all the required forms were submitted and completed properly, the bid schedule contained no arithmetic errors, and the bid bond is authorized. Stadium Manager also confirmed that R.

Brothers Painting, Inc. is authorized to do business in California, is appropriately licensed with the California Contractors State License Board, and is registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Stadium Manager checked references to validate that R. Brothers Painting, Inc. was responsible.

R. Brothers Painting, Inc. submitted a memo along with the bid response. Upon review of the memo and further discussion with the bidder, it was noted that the cost for painting the areas in the Base Bid Schedule and the Alternate No. 1 at the same time would be $17,223. However, if the Base Bid Schedule and Alternate No. 1 work were scheduled at different times as two different jobs, the total cost would be additional.

Next Steps
In accordance with the RFB documents, Stadium Manager has the sole discretion to include any, all, or none of the Alternate Bid items. The Total Bid Price, inclusive of the Base Bid and Alternate No. 1, is $17,223. The cost of this purchase is covered in the FY 21/22 SCSA Capital Expenditures budget referenced under Site, Rust Prevention Mitigation. The approved budgeted amount is $94,500.

Once Stadium Manager receives approval from the SCSA Board, an agreement (detailed in the RFB) will be executed with R. Brothers Painting, Inc., and a fully executed copy of the agreement will be forwarded to the Board. In addition, Stadium Manager requests authorization to issue change orders up to 10% of the agreement which will allow Stadium Manager to take timely administrative action, if required, and not delay completion of the Project. An allocation of approximately 10% of the contract cost, or ,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,*Ā$!(+&$-.Ȁ&+'&Ȁ$)&#Ȁ+%"-Ȁ%$,'&+%%( &% 4 $1,722.30, for a total not to exceed amount of $18,945.30 is within the SCSA Board approved budget for the project.

Supporting documentation has been provided for review and approval. The cost for advertising the RFB in the San Jose Mercury News publication for one day is $759.60.

Stadium Manager’s request to publish legal notices in the San Jose Mercury News for various solicitations, including public works, was approved by the SCSA Board on July 13, 2021. This is a public works project.

Submitted By: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Jenti Vandertuig, Procurement Director

Approved By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________________ Jim Mercurio, Executive Vice President & General Manager

,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,*Ā$!(+&$-.Ȁ&+'&Ȁ$)&#Ȁ+%"-Ȁ%$,'&+%%( &% 

r-;. DocuSigned by:

L:_~ 66~~
1/DocuSigned by :

L~4~

1 Date: November 30, 2021

To: Jim Mercurio
Executive Vice President & General Manager

From: Jenti Vandertuig
Procurement Director

Subject: Recommendation for Award RFB FY21-0018 Levi’s Stadium Electric Rooms Light Fixture Replacement Project

Recommendation

1. Recommend approval and award of a one-time agreement to Ample Electrical, Inc. in the amount of $101,780 for replacement of existing light fixtures in the Levi’s Stadium Electrical Rooms and Telecom Rooms with new LED light fixtures that will provide high efficiency, low maintenance light fixtures with a long-term lifecycle;

2. Authorize Stadium Manager to execute any and all documents associated with, and necessary for the award, completion, and acceptance of this Project; and

3. Authorize Stadium Manager to execute change orders up to 10% of the contract cost, or $10,178, for a total not to exceed amount of $111,958.

Solicitation Process
Forty Niners Stadium Management Company LLC (“Stadium Manager”) has a need to replace existing light fixtures in the Levi’s Stadium (“Stadium”) Electrical Rooms and Telecom Rooms with new LED light fixtures that will provide high efficiency, low maintenance light fixtures with a long-term lifecycle. The lighting improves safety conditions for Stadium personnel and provides energy cost savings with more efficient LED fixtures. The replacement of the Electrical Rooms and Telecom Rooms with new LED fixtures was approved as part of the FY21/22 Santa Clara Stadium Authority (“SCSA”) Capital Expenditures budget.

On October 27, 2021, Stadium Manager issued a Request for Bids (RFB) FY21-0018 to remove and replace the existing florescent fixtures with new LED light fixtures.

-82:1547Ā.7;36893Ā0-)Ā+-$/"!!$Ȁ%!++Ȁ$*,&Ȁ+#!!Ȁ!.'.*/ %(%'%

STADIUM

FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
2 Stadium Manager published the RFB on Bonfire Interactive, Stadium Manager’s eProcurement portal https://49ers.bonfirehub.com/portal/. In addition to inviting a list of suppliers on our established supplier list, Stadium Manager also selected suppliers registered on the portal with specific commodity codes offering infrastructure maintenance and repair services.

On November 3, 2021, Stadium Manager published the Notice Inviting Bids related to this project in the San Jose Mercury News publication. Notices were also emailed on October 27, 2021 to the Builders’ Exchange of Santa Clara County and Minority Business Consortium requesting them to communicate with their respective member communities.

Stadium Manager held a non-mandatory pre-bid conference on November 3, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. (PT) via Zoom to provide an overview of the project and answer any questions from prospective bidders. The RFB provided prospective bidders the option to schedule on-site visits to the Stadium and to request product substitutions with specific deadlines for each of these options.

Electronic bid submissions were due on or before November 22, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. (PT).

Eight bids were received on or before the closing due date and time from the following firms for the base bid:

1. Elecco - $173,800

2. Royal Electric Company - $151,052.37

3. Watt Electric Inc. - $130,000

4. Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. - $110,405

5. Pro-Cal Lighting Inc. - $129,372

6. Ample Electric Inc. - $101,780

7. Pacific Power & Systems, Inc. - $224,745

8. J W. Construction - $291,300

Public Bid Opening
A public bid opening was held on November 22, 2021 at 4:00 p.m. (PT). The RFB provided the public bid opening webcast information including a meeting ID and password for bidders to log on via Zoom to attend. Several bidders were in attendance.

Stadium Manager announced the receipt of eight bids on or before the due date and time, announced the name of each bidder and the base bid amount. Ample Electric, Inc. was declared the apparent low bidder with a base bid amount of $101,780.

-82:1547Ā.7;36893Ā0-)Ā+-$/"!!$Ȁ%!++Ȁ$*,&Ȁ+#!!Ȁ!.'.*/ %(%'%

3 Evaluation of Apparent Low Bidder
Stadium Manager reviewed the bid from Ample Electric, Inc. and determined the bid to be responsive and responsible. The review verified that all the required forms were submitted and completed properly, the bid schedule contained no arithmetic errors, and the bid bond is authorized. Stadium Manager also confirmed that Ample Electric, Inc. is authorized to do business in California, is appropriately licensed with the California Contractors State License Board, and is registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Stadium Manager checked references to validate that Ample Electric, Inc. was responsible.

Next Steps
The Base Bid Price is $101,780. The cost of this purchase is covered in the FY 21/22 SCSA Capital Expenditure budget referenced under Electrical, Mechanical and Electrical Closet Lighting. The approved budgeted amount is $157,500.

Once Stadium Manager receives approval from the SCSA Board, an agreement (detailed in the RFB) will be executed with Ample Electric, Inc. and a fully executed copy of the agreement will be forwarded to the Board. In addition, Stadium Manager requests authorization to issue change orders up to 10% of the agreement which will allow Stadium Manager to take timely administrative action if required and not delay completion of the Project. An allocation of approximately 10% of the contract cost, or $10,178, for a total not to exceed amount of $111,958 is within the SCSA Board approved budget for the project.

There are approximately 260 lighting fixtures throughout the stadium that will be replaced as part of this project. Of those 260 fixtures, approximately 50 are inside Tenant Exclusive Areas. Pursuant to the Stadium Lease, StadCo (tenant) will be charged for the cost of the fixtures in the Tenant Exclusive Areas, and SCSA will be charged for the remainder. The costs to the parties will be allocated based on the relative number of fixtures, which will result in a cost to StadCo of approximately $19,573 ($101,780 x 50/260) and a cost to the SCSA of approximately $82,207 ($101,780 x 210/260). The final cost allocation will be completed after the work is complete.

Supporting documentation has been provided for review and approval. The cost for advertising the RFB in the San Jose Mercury News publication for one day is $721.62.

Stadium Manager’s request to publish legal notices in the San Jose Mercury News for various solicitations, including public works, was approved by the SCSA Board on July 13, 2021. This is a public works project.

-82:1547Ā.7;36893Ā0-)Ā+-$/"!!$Ȁ%!++Ȁ$*,&Ȁ+#!!Ȁ!.'.*/ %(%'% 4 Submitted By: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Jenti Vandertuig, Procurement Director

Approved By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________________ Jim Mercurio, Executive Vice President & General Manager -82:1547Ā.7;36893Ā0-)Ā+-$/"!!$Ȁ%!++Ȁ$*,&Ȁ+#!!Ȁ!.'.*/ %(%'% 

r-; DocuSigned by:

L~ 66~~
1/DocuSigned by:

L~4~

1 Date: November 30, 2021

To: Jim Mercurio
Executive Vice President & General Manager

From: Jenti Vandertuig
Procurement Director

Subject: Recommendation for Award RFB FY21-0015 Levi’s Stadium Luminaire Replacement Project

Recommendation

1. Recommend approval and award of a one-time agreement to Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc., in the amount of $59,144.54 for removal and disposal of existing wall mounted luminaire fixtures, and furnishing and installation of new wall mounted luminaires at Levi’s Stadium;

2. Authorize Stadium Manager to execute any and all documents associated with, and necessary for the award, completion, and acceptance of this Project; and

3. Authorize Stadium Manager to execute change orders up to approximately 10% of the contract cost, or $5,914.45, for a total not to exceed amount of $65,058.99.

Solicitation Process
Forty Niners Stadium Management Company LLC (“Stadium Manager”) has a need to replace the wall and pole mounted luminaire fixtures in and around the loading dock area at Levi’s Stadium (“Stadium”). The current light plan is underpowered and is not sufficient given the work environment during Stadium event load. The Project will improve safety conditions for Stadium and event personnel and provide energy cost savings with more efficient luminaire fixtures. The replacement of the luminaire fixtures was approved as part of the FY21/22 Santa Clara Stadium Authority (“SCSA”) Capital Expenditures budget.

On October 18, 2021, Stadium Manager issued a Request for Bids (RFB) FY21-0015 for removing and disposing the existing luminaire fixtures, furnishing and installation of new luminaires in specific areas at the Stadium. As planned, the requirements were split into two areas for replacement with the Base Bid Scope covering the wall mounted ,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,(Ā*#)#&.),Ȁ!)-&Ȁ#''.Ȁ)'""Ȁ%"",&$$!+" )

STADIUM

FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
2 luminaire fixtures, and an Alternate No. 1 Bid Scope covering the pole mounted luminaire fixtures in and around the Gold parking lots 4 and 5.

Stadium Manager published the RFB on Bonfire Interactive, Stadium Manager’s eProcurement portal https://49ers.bonfirehub.com/portal/. In addition to inviting a list of suppliers on our established supplier list, Stadium Manager also selected suppliers registered on the portal with specific commodity codes offering infrastructure maintenance and repair services.

On October 21, 2021, Stadium Manager published the Notice Inviting Bids related to this project in the San Jose Mercury News publication. Notices were also emailed on October 18, 2021 to the Builders’ Exchange of Santa Clara County and Minority Business Consortium requesting them to communicate with their respective member communities.

Stadium Manager held a non-mandatory pre-bid conference on October 26, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. (PT) via Zoom to provide an overview of the project and answer any questions from prospective bidders. The RFB provided prospective bidders the option to schedule on-site visits to the Stadium and to request product substitutions with specific deadlines for each of these options. Addendum No. 1 was issued on October 26, 2021 providing answers to questions asked during the pre-bid conference.

The RFB specified the luminaire brand Philips Gardco Gullwing LED GL13-W-105LA- 6453-NW-UNIV-RAL7045 and allowed for approved “equal” brands. On November 10, 2021, Stadium Manager received a request for a pre-approval of an alternate brand of luminaire fixture. Stadium Manager reviewed the specifications and documentation submitted for consideration and rejected the alternate brand as it did not meet the requisite color and lumen output. On November 12, 2021 Stadium Manager notified the prospective bidder in writing about the rejection with an explanation as to why it was not an approved “equal”.

Electronic bid submissions were due on or before November 17, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. (PT).

Five bids were received on or before the closing due date and time from the following firms for the base bid:

1. Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. - $59,144.54

2. Elecco - $153,361.60

3. Watt Electric Inc. - $73,410

4. Pro-Cal Lighting Inc. - $59,280

5. Ample Electric Inc. - $73,570

,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,(Ā*#)#&.),Ȁ!)-&Ȁ#''.Ȁ)'""Ȁ%"",&$$!+" )

3 Public Bid Opening
A public bid opening was held on November 17, 2021at 4:00 p.m. (PT). The RFB provided the public bid opening webcast information including a meeting ID and password for bidders to log on via Zoom to attend. Several bidders were in attendance.

Stadium Manager announced the receipt of five bids on or before the due date and time, announced the name of each bidder and the base bid amount. Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. was declared the apparent low bidder with a base bid amount of $59,144.54.

Evaluation of Apparent Low Bidder
Stadium Manager reviewed the bid from Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. and determined the bid to be responsive and responsible. The review verified that all the required forms were submitted and completed properly, the bid schedule contained no arithmetic errors, and the bid bond is authorized. Stadium Manager also confirmed that Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. is authorized to do business in California, is appropriately licensed with the California Contractors State License Board, and is registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Stadium Manager checked references to validate that Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. was responsible.

Next Steps
The Base Bid Price is $59,144.54. The cost of this purchase is covered in the FY 21/22 SCSA Capital Expenditures budget referenced under Site, Gold Lot 4 and 5 Lighting.

The approved budgeted amount is $52,500.

Stadium Manager recommends approval to utilize SCSA approved, unspent and unobligated funds, from the total FY 21/22 SCSA Capital Expenditures budget to cover the additional $6,644.54 plus the 10% to cover potential change orders which is $5,914.45 for a total amount of $12,558.99 needed to establish an agreement with Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. for this Project. There is ample room in the SCSA FY21/22 Capital Expenditures budget to cover the additional cost of $12,588.99. The total not to exceed amount for the Project is $65,058.99.

Stadium Manager has decided to proceed with the Base Bid work only at this time and will evaluate the replacement of the pole mounted luminaires (Alternate No. 1 scope) at a later date.

Once Stadium Manager receives approval from the SCSA Board, an agreement (detailed in the RFB) will be executed with Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. and a fully executed copy of the agreement will be forwarded to the Board. In addition, Stadium Manager requests authorization to issue change orders up to 10% of the agreement which will ,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,(Ā*#)#&.),Ȁ!)-&Ȁ#''.Ȁ)'""Ȁ%"",&$$!+" ) 4 allow Stadium Manager to take timely administrative action if required and not delay completion of the Project.

Supporting documentation has been provided for review and approval. The cost for advertising the RFB in the San Jose Mercury News publication for one day is $702.63.

Stadium Manager’s request to publish legal notices in the San Jose Mercury News for various solicitations, including public works, was approved by the SCSA Board on July 13, 2021. This is a public works project.

Submitted By: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Jenti Vandertuig, Procurement Director

Approved By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________________ Jim Mercurio, Executive Vice President & General Manager

,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,(Ā*#)#&.),Ȁ!)-&Ȁ#''.Ȁ)'""Ȁ%"",&$$!+" ) 

~ DocuSigned by:

L~ 66~~
1/ DocuSigned by :

L~ 4~

1 Date: November 30, 2021

To: Jim Mercurio
Executive Vice President & General Manager

From: Jenti Vandertuig
Procurement Director

Subject: Recommendation for Budget Augm entation for Levi’ Stadium Insulation Capping SCSA Capital Expenditures Project

Recommendation
Recommend a budget augmentation for the Stadium Insulation Project of $360,000, which will increase the budget amount for this project from $157,500 to $517,500. The original budget amount was approved by the Santa Clara Stadium Authority (SCSA) as part of the FY 21/22 SCSA Capital Expenditures Budget.

Reasons for Recommendation
The Stadium Insulation Project (Project) was approved by the SCSA Board as part of the FY 21/22 SCSA Capital Expenditures budget. The approved funds allocated for this Project was $157,500. The original insulation sheeting was failing due to weather conditions and the purpose of this Project was to replace the insulation sheeting intended to help reduce sound reverberation in the concourse level at the Levi’s Stadium (Stadium) and protect the concrete from weather elements.

On October 19, 2021, Forty Niners Stadium Management Company (Stadium Manager) issued a Request for Bids (RFB) FY21-0016 to furnish and install new insulation sheeting above the concourse and concession areas at the Stadium where the existing sheeting is separating from the existing insulation. The plan is to leave the existing insulation in place, and install new sheeting over the insulation to improve the appearance and extend the life of the existing insulation.

Stadium Manager published the RFB on Bonfire Interactive, Stadium Manager’s eProcurement portal https://49ers.bonfirehub.com/portal/. In addition to inviting a list of firms on our established supplier list, Stadium Manager also selected firms registered -7190436Ā.6:25782Ā/-)Ā#" *",'%Ȁ-($,Ȁ$*! Ȁ(!("Ȁ+.-,&.$&',&$

STADIUM

FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
2 on the portal with specific commodity codes offering exterior insulation and finishing services and building insulation services.

On October 21, 2021, Stadium Manager published the Notice Inviting Bids related to this Project in the San Jose Mercury News publication. Notices were also emailed on October 19, 2021 to the Builders’ Exchange of Santa Clara County and Minority Business Consortium requesting them to communicate with their respective communities.

Stadium Manager held a non-mandatory pre-bid conference on October 27, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. via Zoom and also provided options for on-site visits and requests for substitutions by prospective bidders. The RFB closed on November 17, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. and a public bid opening was held at 4:00 p.m. the same day. Two bids were received from the following bidders:

1. Bear Insulation, Inc. with a base bid amount of $465,520

2. Alcal Specialty Contracting, Inc. with a base bid amount of $582,092

While both bidders submitted all the required documents, they also submitted a proposal letter requiring us to accept their terms in addition to the completed bid documents. The Procurement Lead contacted the apparent low bidder and notified them that their cover proposal terms conflicted with the RFB terms.

Stadium Manager evaluated the situation and deemed both bids as non-responsive and notified the bidders of the decision, including advising them on how the public works public bidding process is conducted. Stadium Manager also noted that the apparent low bidder’s base bid amount was $465,520 which was $308,020 more than the $157,500 budget amount for this Project.

Stadium Manager evaluated the situation and believes it is prudent to augment the budget and re-bid the work to replace the insulation sheeting for the following reasons:

1. To improve the appearance and extend the life of the existing insulation;

2. To help reduce sound reverberations in the concourse level at the Stadium;

3. Protect the concrete from weather elements.

Attached as Exhibit A-1 are diagrams illustrating the area including photographs of the insulation sheeting that need to be replaced.

Therefore, approval is sought to augment the budget by $360,000 for a total not to exceed amount of $517,500 for the Project. Once approved by the Board, Stadium Manager will issue a new RFB and submit the bid results with a recommendation to the SCSA Board for review and approval.
-7190436Ā.6:25782Ā/-)Ā#" *",'%Ȁ-($,Ȁ$*! Ȁ(!("Ȁ+.-,&.$&',&$

3 The RFB and related documents have been submitted as supporting documentation with this memo.

Submitted By: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Jenti Vandertuig, Procurement Director

Approved By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________________ Jim Mercurio, Executive Vice President & General Manager

-7190436Ā.6:25782Ā/-)Ā#" *",'%Ȁ-($,Ȁ$*! Ȁ(!("Ȁ+.-,&.$&',&$ 

DocuSigned by:
~v~
A485666FSBF147D ...
1/DocuSigned by :

L ~4~
4 Exhibit “A-1”

Building Section shown below to provide representative elevations above concourse, concession and restroom facilities.

-7190436Ā.6:25782Ā/-)Ā#" *",'%Ȁ-($,Ȁ$*! Ȁ(!("Ȁ+.-,&.$&',&$

5 Layout drawing shown below to represent area of Capping installation (shown in purple) above concourse, concession and restroom facilities.

-7190436Ā.6:25782Ā/-)Ā#" *",'%Ȁ-($,Ȁ$*! Ȁ(!("Ȁ+.-,&.$&',&$ 7" R-29.4 Versa Board 4,090 SF ,. ,.,., "'
7" R-29.4 Versa Board - Black 12,588 SF
I ■s· R-21 Versa Board 61 ,996 SF 'J,., • I' I'' "
s· R-21 Versa -~rd at 0V8"!?!19S 11 ,809 SF
2· Sound Zero 200 Black 19,915 SF
"
;;
e
..
., .. ,
I I
~ .. 43
"!! ~· .. , ~· ·;.
..
r-- --.• (m,i;-::-..;_,.
... "! _.: __ --
" ,,
;;
;;
••
I ,_ ..
[ ~~ s.~ 1----
1 1:r --,,..._.

G015
6 Existing Photos: Images below show the existing condition of the current capping sheets delaminating from the existing insulation.

-7190436Ā.6:25782Ā/-)Ā#" *",'%Ȁ-($,Ȁ$*! Ȁ(!("Ȁ+.-,&.$&',&$

7 -7190436Ā.6:25782Ā/-)Ā#" *",'%Ȁ-($,Ȁ$*! Ȁ(!("Ȁ+.-,&.$&',&$ 8 -7190436Ā.6:25782Ā/-)Ā#" *",'%Ȁ-($,Ȁ$*! Ȁ(!("Ȁ+.-,&.$&',&$

45 The Capital Expense (CapEx) Budget is used to fund the purchase or upgrade of fixed assets for the Stadium. While the funding for appropriations occur on an annual basis, the Capital Expense Plan extends for a five-year period (shown on Page 57 of this report). Changes to existing projects, as well as the addition of new projects, may occur during the five-year planning period as new needs are identified. The appropriations for capital projects do not lapse at year-end bu t carryover into future years until the project is complete.

The FY 2021/22 CapEx Budget totals $14.6 million. Of this total, $11.2 million of prior year appropriations are projected to be carried over fr om FY 2020/21 ($1.5 million of the projected carryover amount is for warranty-related constructi on, and the other $9.7 milli on is for prior year CapEx projects). New capital improvement appropriations equal $3.4 million.

Capital project delivery continues to be delayed, without demonstrated progress on corrective action, by the Stadium Manager due to proc urement issues and violations of State prevailing wage laws.

While the budget reflected in this document reflects projects recommended by the Stadium Manager, the Stadium Authority continues to request a procurement pl an and implementation timelines regarding how these projects will be completed to ensure the upkeep of the facility and balance any potential City resources that ma y be required to support the projec ts. In addition, with the Board’s revocation of delegated procurement authority, the contract awards to complete these projects will need to be brought forward to the Board for approval. As such, the timeline to complete these projects may differ or continue to be delayed from the info rmation presented in this section. Below is data relative to the CapEx budget fo r the Stadium Manager and the ac tual dollars expended, which demonstrate that there is valid concern for the Stadium’s upkeep and surfaces questions whether the Stadium Manager can implement the CapEx budget as requested:

Fiscal Year CapEx Budget for Stadium Manager
Projects and Projects Managed by
Stadium Manager
CapEx Dollars Expended by Stadium
Manager
FY 2018/19 $6.3M $1.4M (22% spend rate)
FY 2019/20 $12.5M $254,753 (2% spend rate)
FY 2020/21 (to date) $8.9M $289,034 (3% projected)

A detailed listing of adopted FY 2021/ 22 projects is provided starting on Page 48 of this report.

Stadium Authority is submitting it as transmitted by the Stadium Manager without any additional details on the nature of the projec t, timing, etc. Stadium Authority has asked almost monthly for a procurement plan for these projec ts, but the Stadium Manager has not produced such workplan. A capital procurement workplan is a reasonable request given the mu ltiple years of no progress, requirements to maintain the Stadium, and transparency.

STADIUM AUTHORITY CAPITAL EXPENSE BUDGET

46 Public Safety Kawasaki Mule
used for public safety patrol
and emergency response
STADIUM AUTHORITY CAPITAL EXPENSE BUDGET (C ONT ’D )

47 2019/20 2019/20 2020/21 2020/21 2021/22 2021/22 2021/22 Total
Final Year-End Final Projected Projected Proposed Proposed Budget Actuals Budget Actuals Carryover Budget Budget
Beginning Balances 14,532,870 $ 14,516,225$ 17,837,300$ 17,010,611$ 19,438,420$ 19,438,420$ Resources
3,478,000 2,318,549 3,582,000 3,547,379 - 3,690,000 3,690,000 - 308,568 - - - - - Total Resources 18,010,870 17,143,342 21,419,300 20,557,990 19,438,420 3,690,000 23,128,420 2019/20 2019/20 2020/21 2020/21 2021/22 2021/22 2021/22 Total
Final Year-End Final Projected Projected Proposed Proposed Budget Actuals(2) Budget Actuals Carryover(3)
Budget Budget
Expenses
Construction 4,956,922 (4,845) 4,725,327 238,156 3,953,911 2,790,000 6,743,911 Equipment 7,070,988 136,765 6,460,557 881,414 5,286,250 448,520 5,734,770 Contingency 657,397 812 559,296 - 462,009 161,926 623,935 Stadium Warranty Related Construction 1,528,202 - 1,528,202 - 1,528,202 - 1,528,202 Total Expenses 14,213,509 132,731 13,273,382 1,119,570 11,230,372 3,400,446 14,630,818 3,797,361$ 17,010,611$ 8,145,918$ 19,438,420$ 8,208,048$ 8,497,602$ (1)
Reimbursement from Stadium Manage r
(2)
Actuals exclude some project payments withheld due to the ManagementCo not following State procurement and prevailing wage laws. (3)
The carryover does not include the Levi's Naming Rights Signage Replacement Project that increased in cost estimate from $650,000 to $900,000.

Transfers In from Stadium Manager
(1)
Capital Expense Reserve
Santa Clara Stadium Authority
Capital Expense Budget Summary
Transfers In from Operating
Storage Conex Garage for Apparatus
allows for storage of three stadium
vehicles in a lockable, weatherproof
container.

48 CapEx projects

Item Type
SCSA
Requested Description Cost
Contingency
(5%) Total Cost
General General Areas / Coatings Main Deck 2,450,000$ 122,500$ 2,572,500$ Building Replace and recoat lymtal traffic deck coating at the lower seating bowl and on the 300 and 700 Level Concourses, which are currently showing signs of wear. The deck coating serves as a secondary waterproofing system for the occupied spaces below these areas and also protects and extends the life of the concrete. Periodic replacement and recoating of this system is necessary to maintain current waterproofing system and maintain the expected life of the structure.

General Field Turf Track Replacement 340,000 17,000 357,000 Building The current turf track carpet is worn, buckled and compacted from use over the past five years and has reached its end of life. This project addresses the uneven grade of the current turf track carpet. This project will remove the existing track and rebuild it using a compacted stone base and shock layer with new carpet on top. Additionally, the project scope permanently addresses the sun grade issues we experience with our current track by stabilizing the base to support the extreme loads it comes under during concerts and dirt events. Finally, the new turf track will eliminate slipping hazards and improve overall safety and appearance.

Subtotal CapEx Construction Costs 2,790,000$ 139,500$ 2,929,500$ Security Drone Detection (Antenna System) 55,000$ 2,750$ 57,750$ Drone intrusions are happening more frequently. We need a detection and deterrent system in place for the Security of our venue and events.

This technology will assist Stadium Security and Law Enforcement in identifying any threats and to take measures to mitigate the threat.

Security Key Management System 20,000 1,000 21,000 This Key-Box system provides a full audit trail and real time reporting, detailing who has used each set of keys and when. Staff and vendors will become more accountable and will assist in return of keys at the end of each shift. This will reduce loss, damage and liability. The new system will be stationed in the 24/7 Security office.

Public Safety RadHalo Remote Radiation Monitors 190,000 9,500 199,500 Equipment
x
New equipment request for the Joint Hazardous Assessment Team (JHAT): Remote radiation detection monitor can be established as a perimeter around the stadium and monitored remotely by JHAT. These units were tested last season with the help of the 95th Civil Support Team. These units proved very useful to monitor large crowds for nuclear and radiation devices that have a potential explosive threat. The team currently uses handheld detectors which are good for pinpointing an exact location around the unit; however, with 4 main gates for ingress and egress, there is no way to fully monitor the crowds for a potential threat without remove monitoring capabilities.

Public Safety PPE Replacement (Nomex Tops) 5,750 288 6,038 Equipment x Projected replacement/additions of Stadium battle dress uniform tops for the team of 60.

Public Safety PPE Replacement (Nomex Bottoms) 3,260 163 3,423 Equipment x Projected replacement/additions of Stadium battle dress uniform bottoms for the team of 60.

Santa Clara Stadium Authority
2021/22 CapEx Budget

49 Item Type
SCSA
Requested Description Cost
Contingency
(5%) Total Cost
Public Safety Rigaku CQL 1064nm Handheld Raman Chemical Detector 50,290 2,515 52,805 Equipment
x
New equipment request for the Joint Hazardous Assessment Team (JHAT). This detector works as a pair with the Tru Defender. The pair combined are able to detect unknown chemicals and substances much quicker than current methods. The unit has a library of over 12,000 substances. This will be very beneficial to determine threats of substances quickly in order to determine evacuation of patrons. JHAT does not carry a detector of this capability. If JHAT came across an unknown substance, a request for mutual aid would be made with likely extended response time. This new equipment would allow the onsite JHAT to analyze substances and chemicals without immediately calling for assistance reducing the impact to the ongoing stadium event.

Public Safety Tru Defender FTX S1 WMD Chemical Detector 63,220 3,161 66,381 Equipment
x
New equipment request for the Joint Hazardous Assessment Team (JHAT). This detector works as a pair with the Rigaku CQL Raman. The pair combined are able to detect unknown chemicals and substances much quicker than current methods. The unit has a library of over 12,000 substances. This will be very beneficial to determine threats of substances quickly in order to determine evacuation of patrons. JHAT does not carry a detector of this capability. If JHAT came across an unknown substance, a request for mutual aid would be made with likely extended response time. This new equipment would allow the onsite JHAT to analyze substances and chemicals without immediately calling for assistance reducing the impact to the ongoing stadium event.

Public Safety Vehicle upfits for John Deere Gator 12,000 600 12,600 Equipment
x
Vehicle upfits for John Deere Gator including a utility box, mirrors, back up camera and a towing hitch for the E690 MCI Trailer. The mirrors and back up camera would allow for greater visibility when the vehicle is being driven in and around large crowds.

Public Safety Kawasaki Mule 25,000 1,250 26,250 Equipment
x
Purchase new Kawasaki Mule for Explosive Ordinance Disposal (EOD) team. Cost includes unfitting the Kawasaki Mule with Police labels and markings, lighting and locking storage boxes. The EOD team does not currently have a dedicated vehicle and are currently walking with canines and EOD gear during response calls for suspicious packages and drone payloads. The EOD team is first on scene sweeping the stadium for safety issues and the last to leave.

Shifts can extend past 10 hours. Purchase of a vehicle would reduce fatigue for officers and canines and reduce response time.

Public Safety Kawasaki Mule 20,000$ 1,000$ 21,000$ Equipment
x
Purchase new Kawasaki Mule for Special Response Team (SRT).

Cost includes unfitting the Kawasaki Mule with Police labels and markings, lighting, equipment storage boxes and Type 3 IME box that is approved by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) to transport/store breacher explosives. The SRT equipment is currently in a standard size vehicle that upon deployment would not easily maneuver the stadium or crowds of attendees; the team would be required to go to the vehicle to retrieve the required equipment extending response time. The vehicle may also be deployed to City issues and the equipment would not be readily available for use. The SRT does not currently have a dedicated vehicle. Purchase of a vehicle would allow the SRT to mobilize needed equipment and will reduce response time.

Public Safety Onsite Conex Storage 4,000 200 4,200 Equipment
x
Locking onsite Conex Storage container to store 3 Police Kawasaki Mules, including the requested EOD and SRT mule purchase. The Conex Storage container will be housed in a parking lot dedicated for police parking with the secured footprint of the Stadium.

Subtotal CapEx Equipment Costs 448,520$ 22,427$ 470,947$ Total New CapEx Project Costs 3,238,520$ 161,927$ 3,400,447$ Santa Clara Stadium Authority
2021/22 CapEx Budget (cont.)

50 Item Type
SCSA
Requested Description Cost
Remaining
Contingency Total Cost
Electrical Mechanical and Electrical Closet Lighting (2019/20 Carryover) 150,000$ 7,500$ 157,500$ Install LED lighting in all mechanical and electrical closets located in the service tunnel, 300 Level, and 700 level. These lights not only improve visibility, but also provide longer and more efficient power usage.

Electrical Broadcast Booth Power (2019/20 Carryover) 35,000 1,750 36,750 Install power components used for stadium events. These components will adhere to LEED certification, provide a clean source of power for our clients, and improve operating efficiencies.

Electrical Concessions Cart Cabling (2019/20 Carryover) 50,000 2,500 52,500 Install code rated low voltage cabling (CAT6) to portable concession carts. This will provide Internet Protocol (IP) based access to the IPTV menu boards and Point of Sale (POS) systems for credit card transactions, as well as deliver an emergency signage to be displayed at the concession stands if needed.

General Updated Stadium Wayfinding Signage (2020/21 Carryover) 250,000 12,500 262,500 Building Install Premium/Club wayfinding, Suite wayfinding, Smoking section signs, No smoking signs for around the main and upper concourses, section numbers/floor decals, ADA blue lines, tunnel signs that indicate “no photos/no autographs”, etc.

General Stadium Event Signage (2019/20 Carryover) 138,000 6,900 144,900 Building Install stadium signage (including but not limited to tunnel awnings, accessible seating reference areas, lower bowl sections placards, and additional fire and building code signage per Fire Marshal).

General Command Post Window Treatment (2019/20 Carryover) 16,000 800 16,800 Building Install window shades and/or tint the exterior windows on the 800 level command post to reduce heat and glare. This will assist dispatchers and command post operators working in this space.

General Stadium and Special Event Spaces (2019/20 Carryover) 75,000 3,750 78,750 Building Add entry mats to be placed at stadium entrances to help alleviate wet floor scenarios and provide safety to stadium patrons. Will extend the finish of the existing flooring and help prevent slip and falls during inclement weather.

General Non-Slip Floor Matting (2019/20 Carryover) 50,000 2,500 52,500 Building Install non-slip matting from the north side locker rooms to tunnels primarily for event usage (that include access to the field for athletes, performers and customers).

General Women's Locker Room (2019/20 Carryover) 372,000 18,600 390,600 Building Convert a portion of the auxiliary locker room area to accommodate a larger private space for female athletes, performers, officials, and other female event day sporting and entertainment professionals visiting or working events at Levi's Stadium.

General Automatic Logic Control Building Engineering System 35,000 1,750 36,750 Building (2019/20 Carryover)
Install an automatic logic controller system upgrade to monitor the building's HVAC in all quadrants simultaneously. This updated system will enable graphic interface and help the system to operate more efficiently with time clock management and assist in potential lighting control energy savings.

General Club Space Flooring (2019/20 Carryover) 85,000 4,250 89,250 Building Strip, resurface, and/or replace hardwood flooring surfaces in the BNY East & West and Levi's 501 spaces. These spaces are among the most utilized spaces in the building and get a large amount of foot traffic. This work will help extend the useful life of these spaces as well as reducing slips and falls from worn floors.

Santa Clara Stadium Authority
2021/22 CapEx Budget Carryover

51 Item Type
SCSA
Requested Description Cost
Remaining
Contingency Total Cost
General Command Post Communication Equipment (2019/20 Carryover) 58,000 2,900 60,900 Building Purchase and install public safety screens, monitors, and projection devices used in monitoring stadium and security operations to help improve situational awareness and response.

General Stadium Field Conduits (2018/19 Carryover) 118,197 5,910 124,107 Building Add a permanent solution for power and data on field/floor of stadium, making electrical connections safer and efficient for concert and events.

Plumbing Lift Station (2020/21 Carryover) 200,000 10,000 210,000 Replace pumps, motors and controls at sewage ejector sumps in Quadrants A, B, C & D on 100 level.

Plumbing Plumbing (2020/21 Carryover) 100,000 5,000 105,000 Replace pressure reducing valves and other parts on domestic and recycled water systems.

Public Safety Pedestrian Safety Fencing (2020/21 Carryover) 100,000 5,000 105,000 x
Install raised fencing on Tasman Drive from Centennial Boulevard to Calle Del Sol. This is approximately 0.4 miles and would be adjacent to the VTA/Light Rail tracks. This fencing is required to guarantee the safety of patrons as pedestrians on Tasman Drive. Currently, pedestrians regularly jump temporary construction barriers and cross eastbound Tasman Drive and cross live/active VTA light rail tracks. In addition, during events the traffic flow is reversed and pedestrians will not expect cars coming from that direction. This poses a clear danger for pedestrians and mobile personnel are not always available to prevent this regular attempt by pedestrians. Raised fencing will guarantee this dangerous situation stops. The cost is an estimate based on the Fencing on Tasman project.

Security Surveillance - Command Center Equipment (2020/21 Carryover) 50,000 2,500 52,500 Build out workstations with equipment that can handle the load of video viewing during large scale events, as well as the 24/7 security operations in both 100 and 800 command rooms. Equipment includes, but is not limited to, monitors, keyboards, video cards, CPU processors, power supplies, motherboards, and cabling.

Security Enhance Stadium Security Coverage (2020/21 Carryover) 330,000$ 16,500$ 346,500$ Evaluate and replace existing cameras with technologically advanced multi-lens panoramic/360/multi-directional cameras. Design locations and camera styles have created visual obstructions and gaps in coverage. Height locations with fixed lens cameras create the inability to adjust field of views. Installation of television monitors/signage near camera mounts have created field of view obstructions. Due to high volume of club space usage for large scale, and smaller events, request for video investigations become frequent. Low lighting situations are constant with event type needs, and enhanced technology from newer cameras will enable greater video quality. The areas which need to be evaluated include, but are not limited to: BNY Mellon East and West Club, Y ahoo Club, United Club, FII Club, 501 Club, Citrix Owners Club, Entry Gates, and Perimeter fences.

Security Enhance Stadium Security Access Control (2020/21 Carryover) 235,000 11,750 246,750 Install card readers on manual doors to increase access control features and security. Based on operational demands, doors have been identified via staff request and event activity in order to improve operational awareness and enhance the access control abilities by automating the doors. This also increases security to areas deemed by staff to hold sensitive or high value assets. The access control enhancements include Vertx/Mercury upgrade, EvoE400/Mercury upgrade, and various doors with access control needs.

Santa Clara Stadium Authority
2021/22 CapEx Budget Carryover (cont.)

52 Item Type
SCSA
Requested Description Cost
Remaining
Contingency Total Cost
Security CCTV Pop Up Trailers (2020/21 Carryover) 235,000 11,750 246,750 Purchase five (5) additional units to continue to meet NFL Best Practices guidelines by covering parking lots outside stadium footprint that currently have no camera coverage.

Security Parking Lot Camera Upgrades (2020/21 Carryover) 40,000 2,000 42,000 Replace Great America parking lot cameras with technologically advanced multi- lens panoramic/360/multi-directional cameras. New camera technology would provide better overall coverage of the main parking lot. Sun baked cameras with fixed angles have created gaps in coverage. With more video incident request coming from
ingress/egress incidents, new technology would assist in these investigations. Install cameras in Gold lot 4/5 where there is very limited coverage.

Security Bowl Camera Upgrade/Refurbish (2020/21 Carryover) 135,000 6,750 141,750 Replace bowl cameras. Several bowl cameras have become sun baked and provide poor/obscured coverage of bowl seating.

Maintenance has become an issue as it takes a lot of time and money to set up scaffolding to reach camera boxes. Need to re-engineer housing (suggest relocating housing closer to stadium infrastructure).

Security Software Upgrade to Genetec 5.8 (2020/21 Carryover) 35,000 1,750 36,750 Upgrade to Genetecs newest firmware version 5.8. This would improve overall system performance and stability, and add new features that will help in operator training and utilization of software. Customizable live dashboards assist in monitoring alarms and events in real time.

Security Video Analytics (2020/21 Carryover) 35,000 1,750 36,750 Add video analytics to assist with video investigations. Video investigations take several hours/days to complete using traditional playback methods. Adding video analytics will greatly decrease man- hours spent in video review process, as well as aid in investigations using newer technology.

Security License Plate Reader at Vehicle Entry Gates 45,000 2,250 47,250 (2020/21 Carryover)
Add six (6) License Plate Reader cameras on entry/exit lanes of all vehicle gates (Post 1,2, and 3) to document and track vehicles entering and exiting the stadium.

Security Security X-Ray Scanners (2020/21 Carryover) 150,000 7,500 157,500 Purchase four (4) portable X-ray units to observe postage that comes into the loading dock 24/7 and screen bags/deliveries during event days.

Security Stadium Camera Booth Card Readers (2019/20 Carryover) 84,000 4,200 88,200 Install card reader for north and south camera booths to secure the spaces that enter into/from general public access areas.

Site Security Fencing - Main Lot (2020/21 Carryover) 150,000 7,500 157,500 Remove and replace approximately 1,000 linear feet of 4-foot high security fencing in Main Lot per request of City.

Site Stationary Electric Pressure Washers (2020/21 Carryover) 75,000 3,750 78,750 Install one (1) to two (2) demo stations on the 300 concourse. If these are effective, we would look to replace all gas-powered pressure washers with electrically powered ones.

Site Stadium Insulation (above 300 level and below 400/500 level) (2019/20 Carryover)
150,000 7,500 157,500
Install new insulation in the 400/500 underside above the 300 level.

Original insulation is failing due to weather conditions. This also helps reduce sound reverberation throughout the concourse and protects the concrete from the elements.

Santa Clara Stadium Authority
2021/22 CapEx Budget Carryover (cont.)

53 Item Type
SCSA
Requested Description Cost
Remaining
Contingency Total Cost
Site Gold Lot 4 and 5 Lighting (2019/20 Carryover) 50,000 2,500 52,500 Install LED lighting in Gold 4 and Gold 5 parking lots. The current light plan is underpowered and is not sufficient given the work environment during stadium event load in/out. This lighting improves safety conditions for stadium personnel and provides energy cost savings with more efficient fixtures.

Site Rust Prevention Mitigation (2019/20 Carryover) 90,000 4,500 94,500 Implement rust prevention measures. The stadium railings, beams, and other steel areas need rust prevention and coating in specific areas throughout the stadium.

Site Stadium Event Power Upgrades & Switchgear Electrical (2019/20 Carryover)
42,714$ 2,136$ 44,850$
Install and enhance Stadium Event wiring service on the 12 Kilovolt (KV) Primary Switch Gear (PMSG) to main electrical panel.

Site Asphalt (2018/19 Carryover) 190,000 9,500 199,500 Slurry coat the visitor parking on Tasman, Gold 4 & 5 parking lots and South Access Road.

Subtotal CapEx Construction Carryover Costs 3,953,911$ 197,696$ 4,151,607$ Audio/Visual Radio Booth Cabling (2019/20 Carryover) 600,000$ 30,000$ 630,000$ Install fiber optic cabling to increase the low voltage cabling backbone.

This installation will accommodate the expanding requests for booth usage during stadium events and keep up with emerging trends.

Audio/Visual Crestron Control & Building Operating System Upgrades (2019/20 Carryover)
10,000 500 10,500
Install a Creston Control System to monitor HVAC, lighting, electrical, and fire alarms. This comprehensive system enables all of these items to interface with one another for engineers to see a real time view of the building's systems.

Food and Beverage Distribution System (2020/21 Carryover) 50,000 2,500 52,500 Beverage Add a beverage distribution system to stadium concession areas and bars. This includes the lines and CO2 dispensing equipment.

Food and CO2 Monitoring & Sensors for Code Compliance 200,000 10,000 210,000 Beverage (2020/21 Carryover)
Install remote CO2 monitoring for enhanced safety for stadium staff per SCFD & State of CA.

Furniture, Fixtures Replace Furniture in Club and Special Event Spaces 1,600,000 80,000 1,680,000 & Equipment (2019/20 Carryover)
Purchase replacement furniture for clubs (BNY, United, Levi's 501 and Yahoo) and special event spaces to enhance areas and meet client expectations. These spaces are amongst the most utilized in the entire stadium.

Furniture, Fixtures Security and Life Safety Partitions/Dividers 68,000 3,400 71,400 & Equipment (2019/20 Carryover)
Install service tunnel drapery and/or partitions for security and public safety personnel during stadium events that require public access to the service level. This helps coordinate public movements in "back of house areas" without affecting stadium operations.

Furniture, Fixtures Tunnel Slip and Fall Protection (2019/20 Carryover) 30,000 1,500 31,500 & Equipment Install non-slip material at the South, Northeast, and Northwest Field Tunn
els.

Furniture, Fixtures Guest Service Booths (2018/19 Carryover) 70,000 3,500 73,500 & Equipment Add two additional guest services booths on the main concourse for better enhanced customer service touchpoints.

HVAC/ Variable Frequency Drive(s) (2020/21 Carryover) 150,000 7,500 157,500 Mechanical Replace exterior Variable Frequency Drive units for Cooling Tower pumps due to life expectancy issues. This system supports the mechanical cooling functions for the HVAC system.
2021/22 CapEx Budget Carryover (cont.)
Santa Clara Stadium Authority

54 Item Type
SCSA
Requested Description Cost
Remaining
Contingency Total Cost
HVAC/ Cooling Towers (2020/21 Carryover) 50,000 2,500 52,500 Mechanical Replace Cooling Towers internal parts and systems. This includes the motors, fans, fill, controls, and piping which support the mechanical cooling functions for the HVAC system.

HVAC/Mechanical Kitchen Exhaust Fans (2019/20 Carryover) 300,000 15,000 315,000 Install variable frequency drive (VFD) Units on kitchen exhaust fans for soft start (slow ramp up) capabilities. Kitchen exhaust fans currently operate 100 percent of the time. Installing VFD units will modulate the power and save energy whenever the fan is in use. Soft start extends the life of the equipment and saves energy.

Information Financial Management Information System Project 270,000 13,500 283,500 Technology (2020/21 Carryover)
x
Procure a new cloud-based financial management system for the Stadium Authority that would allow greater visibility in to Non-NFL Events. The management company that handles Non-NFL events would use the financial management system for all transactions related to Non- NFL events as well as store supporting documentation for the transactions (Including invoices). The costs include software license/subscription, hosting fee and a consultant for implementation and process improvement. There will be ongoing software license costs and possibility for additional staff time for implementation. *Subject to subsequent court rulings on cost allocation.

Life Fire Alarm System (2020/21 Carryover) 250,000 12,500 262,500 Safety/Fire Replace/update fire alarm system field devices, including interior/exterior signaling devices, detectors, and control panel parts.

Life Safety/Fire Fire Sprinkler Extension (2019/20 Carryover) 55,000 2,750 57,750 Add fire sprinklers to the Gate F entrance. The Santa Clara Fire Marshal has requested that fire sprinklers be installed at the Gate F entrance to mitigate potential fire risk beneath the existing ribbon boards.

Public Safety Mass Casualty Incident Trailer (2020/21 Carryover) 120,000 6,000 126,000 Equipment
x
Purchase a Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) Trailer. The fire department currently has equipment to treat 25 patients during a large-scale emergency. The MCI Trailer would allow the first responders to treat between 500-1000 people during a large-scale emergency by allowing quick access to on-board equipment and supplies.

Public Safety 2-Way CAD/24-7 Link (2020/21 Carryover) 82,000$ 4,100$ 86,100$ Equipment
x
Add a 2-way link between the 24/7 dispatch system and the CAD system. All stadium personnel operate on the 24/7 dispatch system.

SCPD and SCFD operate on the CAD system. When public safety personnel are sent on calls, the call must be generated by hand in both systems. This causes extra work for dispatchers, however, more importantly this creates delays in reporting and responses to public safety incidents. A 2-way link would allow both systems to “talk” to each other and automatically create incidents in each other’s system.

Additionally, without this link, we cannot log officers on which creates an officer safety issue as well as an issue when it comes to management of personnel.

Public Safety Dispatch Monitors (2020/21 Carryover) 8,000 400 8,400 Equipment
x
Replace dispatch monitors with larger screens. Our public safety dispatchers utilize several screens at their work stations in order to facilitate their duties. The necessary upgrading of our latest public safety communications center’s CAD and associated software will require larger screen area to effectively manage the new information.

These 16 replacement 22" larger monitors are needed to optimize the use and intended application of the latest public safety dispatching software. The larger screens are required to view the additional windows from the CAD system and are expected to last five years. The prior monitors were purchased six years ago and are 19" monitors. The cost includes estimated installation for three workstations.

Santa Clara Stadium Authority
2021/22 CapEx Budget Carryover (cont.)

55 Item Type
SCSA
Requested Description Cost
Remaining
Contingency Total Cost
Public Safety Radio Chargers (2020/21 Carryover) 3,000 150 3,150 Equipment
x
Add three radio charging stations. Our radio equipment is critical and, therefore, their serviceability must be maintained. Each new radio will require a charging port. These three charging stations each have a 6- radio capacity and three are needed to maintain radios at their peak power and usability. Having these three charging stations will ensure all radios are ready for use by public safety without the risk of personnel being without this crucial equipment in a functional state.

Public Safety Radios (2020/21 Carryover) 79,000 3,950 82,950 Equipment
x
Add new radios to equip additional staff in our public safety deployment. Personnel will continue to use these specific radios for varied public safety responsibilities. These radios allow for communication to the command post and between public safety partners working our events. Without these critical radios, personnel would not be able to function in their capacity and as expected to provide public safety services including emergency response. There is a yearly operating cost; requesting quote.

Public Safety GPS Software for Tracking Personnel 25,000 1,250 26,250 Equipment (2019/20 Carryover)
x
Add GPS software to track public safety personnel. Live tracking of law enforcement personnel is critical in providing an accurate picture of public safety coverage. This technology and software will allow the Command Post to know where our personnel are at all times and make necessary assignment adjustments on the go. It is desired that the software also be capable of retaining data for historical analysis. The requested funding of $25,000 is the initial purchase price for approximately 100 devices and the software. There is a monthly operating cost of $30/month each; $36,000 total annually.

Public Safety Fencing on Tasman (2019/20 Carryover) 70,000 3,500 73,500 Equipment
x Add fencing to prevent stadium event pedestrian traffic from crossing unsafely between Lafayette St. and the Tasman St. overcrossing.

Public Safety Street Signage (2017/18 Carryover) 1,000,000 50,000 1,050,000 Equipment
x
Add street signage. This item was brought before the SCSA Board and approved in the 2017/18 budget. Staff has been working with the Department of Public Works, the Executive Director's office and the Chief of Police's office to identify appropriate locations on surrounding city streets (Great America Parkway, Tasman Drive, etc.) to place signage to better protect, inform and serve patrons visiting Levi's ®
Stadium, non-event day traffic, community event advisories and emergency public safety and traffic advisories.

Public Safety Staff Scheduling Software (2019/20 Carryover) 16,250 813 17,063 Equipment
x
The Stadium requires SEOs to operate safely. Notifying and communicating with our SEOs is critical in properly planning our staffing needs. We currently use an out of date version of “Game Day Staffing.” Public Safety Portable License Plate Reader/PTZ Cameras 160,000 8,000 168,000 Equipment (2018/19 Carryover)
x
Purchase portable license plate readers. Placing temporary/moveable license plate readers in remote stadium parking lots will provide better information and intelligence to the Command Post in order to deter crime and assist in apprehending crime suspects in the aftermath of an incident.

Vertical Transport Elevator Door Replacement (2019/20 Carryover) 20,000 1,000 21,000 Replace and install new elevator doors on one of the freight elevators in the stadium.

Subtotal CapEx Equipment Carryover Costs 5,286,250$ 264,313$ 5,550,563$ Carryover costs from the original Stadium Construction Budget for warranty-related work. 1,528,202$ 1,528,202$
Total CapEx Carryover Costs 10,768,363$ 462,009$ 11,230,372$ Santa Clara Stadium Authority
2021/22 CapEx Budget Carryover (cont.)
Stadium Warranty-Related
Construction

56 The Capital Expense budget does not include the requested Levi’s Naming Rights Signage Replacement Project totaling $945,000 which in cludes a 5% contingency. The Naming Rights Agreement Section 5(f) states, “Naming Rights Sponsor shall be entitled, at its sole cost and expense, to replace, update, change, refr esh or refurbish any such in itial signage at any time and from time to time…”. Based on this language, it is the Stadium Authority’s position that the full signage replacement is the responsibilit y of the Naming Rights Sponsor and may constitute a gift of public funds.

There are over 40 CapEx projects that the Stadium Manager has requested over the past three fiscal years and the Stadium Manager has not been able to legally and properly implement these identified needs. The CapEx projects keep growing and, as we all know, repair and maintenance work gets more costly the longer it is delayed. Additionally, given the short turnaround time from receipt of these requests to publishing the proposed budget, the Stadium Authority did not have time to conduct any due diligence on whether the CapEx projects are proper ly assigned to Stadium Authority, estimated accurately, are in fact needed, or any other conf irmation required to support the budgeting of these items. These items are being transmitted as submitted by the Stadium Manager and the Board would be wise to get more information about these projects and purpose for excessive delay in implementing them—including a procurement workplan that provides a schedule for project implementation.

Item Type
SCSA
Requested Description Cost
Contingency
(5% ) Total Cost
General
Levi's Naming Rights Signage Replacement (2020/21 Carryover) 900,000$ 45,000 $ 945,000$
Building Replace Levi's Naming Rights signage. The cost of this project increase from $650,000 to $900,000. Based on the Naming Rights Agreement, it is the Santa Clara Stadium Authority's position that this project is the responsbility of Levi's.

Subtotal Projects Not Recommended 900,000$ 45,000$ 945,000$ Santa Clara Stadium Authority
2021/22 CapEx Project Submittal Not Recommended

57 STADIUM AUTHORITY CAPITAL EXPENSE 5-Y EAR

FORECAST

2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget
Electrical -$ -$ 750,000$ 1,250,000$ 1,475,000$ General Building 2,790,000 1,875,000 1,138,000 2,050,000 3,100,000 Plumbing - 150,000 - - 375,000 Public Safety - - - - - Security - 150,000 - - 1,110,000 Site - 400,000 - 150,000 450,000 Subtotal CapEx Construction Costs 2,790,000$ 2,575,000$ 1,888,000$ 3,450,000$ 6,510,000$ Audio/Visual -$ 870,000$ -$ -$ 650,000$ FF&E - - 30,000 - 61,669 Food & Beverage - - - - 1,200,000 HVAC/Mechanical - 150,000 - 225,000 225,000 Information Technology - - - - - Life Safety/Fire - - - 50,000 - Security 75,000 - - - - Public Safety Equipment 373,520 526,510 164,010 193,010 28,010 Vertical Support - - - - - Subtotal CapEx Equipment Costs 448,520$ 1,546,510$ 194,010$ 468,010$ 2,164,679$ Contingency (5%) 161,926 206,076 104,101 195,901 433,734 Total CapEx Project Costs 3,400,446$ 4,327,586$ 2,186,111$ 4,113,911$ 9,108,413$ Santa Clara Stadium Authority
Capital Expense Plan Summary - 5 Year Forecast
t!W?i

STADIUM

FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
December 15, 2021
Santa Clara Stadium Authority
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Levi's Stadium
Santa Clara, CA
Recommendation for Award and Budget Augmentation Questions and Answers Ms. Jung:

The following is a response to your four separate emails regarding recent recommendations for awards of Levi's Stadium Capex Projects. Stadium Manager has responded to each of your questions listed in the emails listed below. Specifically, this letter responds to the questions contained in the following emails: including the most recent one sent yesterday afternoon.

1. December 8, 2021 email titled, "RE: Recommendation for Award - Rust Mitigation"

2. December 8, 2021 email titled, "RE: Recommendation for award for the Levi's Stadium Electrical Rooms Light Fixtures Project"

3. December 8, 2021 email titled, "RE: Recommendation for Award for the Luminaire Replacement Project"

4. December 14, 2021 email titled, "RE: Recommendation for a Budget Augmentation for the Levi's Stadium Insulation Capping"
EMAIL #1: RE: Recommendation for Award- Rust Mitieation:
l. The Cap Ex project is budgeted for $94,500, which is significantly higher than the bid amount that is being requested for approval. How does this amount differ than the engineer estimate?
Market research was performed while developing the bid documents . This res earch led us to anticipate a project cost of approximately $30,000, but we were aware of uncontrollable trends that may have impacted the project cost. This estimated project cost was intentionally held to a lower dollar value than the approved budget because of the volatility in the market place for paint while the bid documents were developed. Specifically, our research identified a national paint shortage and ongoing supply issues in the late summer and early fall months of 2021, which can be researched in the September 10, 2021 CNBC article "Paint is getting costlier and harder to find. and this could just be the be.ginning."

STADIUM

FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Manufacturers specu lated that additional pricing actions could influence rising costs. Prices for painting and coating manufacturing rose 10.6% in August of 2021. We intentionally held the projects quantities to a lower amount due to this uncertainty in material costs and supply chain issues.

Additionally, we know that that pricing for this type of project may vary greatly depending on the type of lift or access equipment used by the Contractor. Lift and access equipment are typically the means and methods of the Contractor, which has a direct impact on the project cost. We learned after the bid opening that the Contractor recommended for award for this project made the decision to not charge the lift equipment expenses to the project, which may have also lowered the cost of the over budget.

All of this research led us to specify a smaller quantity of paint for this pilot project to both reduce the risk of overrunning the project budget. Due to the uncertainty in market conditions , we included an Adjustment of Bid Quantities language that allows the Stadium Manager to reserve the right to increase or delete actual quantities of work by up to 25% of the estimated quantities reflected in the bid schedules (base bid and alternate) without any change to the unit price costs bid and without liability of any kind.

In summary, we believe that the combination of focusing the paint to a small test area , as well as receiving competitive pricing, resulted in a bid amount that is less than the project budget. Upon completion and confidence in the work performed, we will bring forward any additional scope necessary for further any required approvals .

2. Will this be a multi-phased project, and if so, why wasn't entire project bid out at the same time to ensure strategic procurement?
Yes. The scope of this project was intended to be a pilot project and will be expanded to other areas of the stadium in future solicitations , but only after a thorough review and evaluation is conducted. The strategic decision was made to test the paint application prior to spending a large amount of money on a larger painting contract to ensure that the product and application was acceptable . If acceptable, this scope of work will be included as a multi-phased project that will be expanded to other parts of the stadium. We anticipate that this may become a regularly occurring project that will likely occur in several phases and years for when the need arises to paint and recoat the structural steel throughout the stadium .

Also, the current contract recommended for award includes Adjustment of Bid Quantities language in the RFB that allows the Stadium Manager to reserve the right to increase or ·•i?1 ;

STADIUM

FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
delete actual quantities of work by up to 25% of the estimated quantities reflected in the bid schedules (base bid and alternate) for this contract without any change to the unit price costs bid and without liability of any kind.

3. Why was the project bid out as a construction project? The painting work is a standard public works project similar to other construction proje cts because it does not qualify as maintenance under the statutory definition set forth in Public Contract Code section 22002( d) (2). That statute defines maintenance to mean "minor repainting." The Rust Mitigation project goes well beyond minor repainting (i.e., touchup type painting) as it involves full paint and rust removal and repainting of large areas of the facility.

EMAIL #2: RE: Recommendation for award for the Levi's Stadium Electrical Rooms Li~ht Fixtures Project

1. The CapEx proj ect is budgeted for $157,500 which is higher than the bid amount that is being requested for approval. How does this amount differ than the engineer estimate ? The recommended NTE amount of $111,958 is lower than the approved Cap Ex budget amount to $157,500 because of reduction in scope, (the Mechanical Rooms will be handled in a later project) but offset by significant price escalation in construction costs . It is important to note that construction costs have been extremely volatile; thus , making the comparison of current pricing to earlier conceptual estimates difficult. Data provided by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics through November 2021 indicate that nonresidential construction input prices rose 24.5% in the past year . In view of the current market volatility, the overall scheduling of various Stadium projects and events, and an opportunity to phase this work in order to evaluate the performance of the upgrades, we decided it was appropriate to handle the Mechanical Rooms in a later project.

2. Will this be a multi-phased project, and if so, why didn't the Stadium Manager bid for the entire project at the same time to ensure strategic procurement? As noted above , this bid does not include the Mechanical Rooms, which will be handled in a later project.
·•=u Ji

STADIUM

FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY

3. The proposed work is for the Electricals and Telecom Rooms. Can you confirm that they are mechanical and electrical closets locat ed in the 300 and 700 level as outlined under the CapEx project description?
Yes. We can confirm the proposed work is for electrical closets throughout the stadium including 300 and 700 level.

4. The Stad ium Manager has existing agreements with Bear Electrical and Cupertino Electric for electr ical repairs and maintenance, including lighting and physical security work. Would those agreeme nts' scope of work cover this project, and if so, why didn't the Stadium Manager use them? It was our judgment that bidding this project separately would deliver the most advantageous outcome, and that was confirmed by the results of the process . The agreements with Bear Electrical Solutions , Inc. and Cupertino Electric Inc. approved by the SCSA Board on April 20, 2021 were established for on call electrical repairs and maintenance . At that time, we provided an anticipated list of projects for the first year of the agreement which comprised of projects utilizing operational expenses . This list of projects identified for the Bear Electrical Solutions , Inc. and Cupertino Electrical Inc. agreements are included below and can be referenced in my email to you on Wednesday, April 7, 2021 .

For FY21/22, we would anticipate the following task orders ( all of which are included in the FY21/22 budget):
• Testing of the Primary Main Switch Gear and Primary Switch Gear, - $200,000 • 480V Distribution Equipment Clean and Torque - $50,000 • Inspection and Testing of Emergency lnverter-$7,000
• Building Controls Service and Support - $39,000
• There is also an allowance miscellaneous unanticipated repairs for electrical equipment, security low voltage systems,fire alarm low voltage systems and other general equipment in the FY 2021/22 budget. - $24,000

5. If those agreements did not cover this work, why didn't the Stadium Manager combine the bids for this project and the Luminaire Project? The work appears to be very similar and the Stadium Manager may have received better pricing if they were comb ined. wljf-J' J

STADIUM

FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
There is obviously a tension between combining multiple projects versus bidding tighter scopes . On the one hand you may get economies of scale for mobilization costs and general conditions, on the other hand you may reduce the pool of interested bidders by creating larger projects which are less appealing to smaller contractors due to various factors such as staffing, bonding capacity, etc. In this case, our judgement was that combining the two approved SCSA CapEx projects into one Request for Bid would not have resulted in an outcome that would have been more advantageous .

EMAIL #3: RE: Recommendation for Award for the Luminaire Replacement Project We reviewed this request and supporting documentation and have the following questions/comments:

1. The Stadium Manager's recommendation to award an agreement to the lowest bidder for the Base Bid's scope of work (the removal and installation of luminaire fixtures in Levi's Stadium's loading dock area) doesn't appear to align with the Gold Lot 4 and 5 Lighting Cap Ex project description. Can you please let us know what changed to prioritize the docking station over the parking lots?
The base bid scope of work aligns with the project description. Specifically, the project description stated , "The current light plan is underpowered and is not sufficient given the work environment during stadium event load in/out. " The loading dock, Gold Lot 4 and Gold Lot 5 light fixtures are all integral to the overall lighting outside of the stadium during stadium event load in/out and are part of the same lighting system . The loading dock lighting is included in this project description and meets the project description intent of improving the lighting for "stadium event load in/out" . The loading dock lighting was selected as the base scope because it experiences the highest amount of traffic outside of the stadium during event load in/out.

2. If the Stadium Manager would like to pursue this work for the loadin g dock area that would require a budget amendmen t since the project scope has significantly changed.

We disagree. Gold Lot 4/5 and the loading dock are all part of the event load in area at the south end of the Stadium . The loading dock area was included in the approved Cap Ex item, as it is a key component of the lighting required for event load in/out, as referred to in this sentence from the approved SCSA Cap Ex budget: "The current lighting plan is underpowered and is not sufficient given the work environment during stadium event load in/out" .
••Q?1 ;

STADIUM

FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Furthermore, the project scope that was published on October 17, 2021, clearly stated that the Base Bid scope was for the loading dock (in yellow), with the pole mounted luminaire's as an add/alt item (in red):

WALL MOUNTED LUMINAIRE (26)
These documents have been available to City Staff since they were published more than two months ago.

However, if City Staff believes it is an appropriate use of their resources to obtain Board approval to amend the SCSA Cap Ex Budget to insert the words "loading dock" to further underscore that the loading dock lighting is a part of the lighting required for event load in/ out, we recommend City Staff handle that at the same time the Board considers the contract award.

3. Does the Stadium Manager anticipate implementing a new RFB for the Gold Lot 4 and 5 Lighting Cap Ex Project this fiscal year? If not, Stadium Authority staff recommends eliminating the line item as part of the Board report recommendation to reflect this change .

Yes. The Stadium Manager anticipates a future solicitation for Phase 2 of the Gold Lot 4 and 5 project for next fiscal year.
.,~,, ;

STADIUM

FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY

4. The Stadium Manager has existing agreements with Bear Electrical and Cupertino Electric for electrical repairs and maintenance, including lighting and physical security work. Does those agreements' scope of work cover this project, and if so, why didn't the Stadium Manager use them? The agreements with Bear Electrical Solutions , Inc. and Cupertino Electric Inc. approved by the SCSA Board on April 20, 2021 were established for on call electrical repairs and maintenance. At that time, we provided an anticipated list of projects for the first year of the agreement which comprised of projects utilizing operational expenses . This list of projects identified for the Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. and Cupertino Electrical Inc. agreements are included below and can be referenced in my email to you on Wednesday, April 7, 2021.

For FY21/22, we would antic ipate the following task orders (all of which are included in the FY21/22 budget):
• Testing of the Primary Main Switch Gear and Primary Switch Gear, - $200,000 • 480V Distribution Equiprnent Clean and Torque - $50,000 • Inspect ion and Testing of Emergency Inverter - $7,000 • Building Controls Service and Support - $39,000
• There is also an allowance miscellaneous unanticipated repairs for electrical equipment, security low voltage systems,fire alarm low voltage systems and other general equipment in the FY 2021/22 budget. - $24,000

5. If those agreements don't cover this work, why didn't the Stadium Manager combine the RFBs for this project and the Electric Rooms Light Fixtures Project? The work appears similar and the Stadium Manager may have received better pricing that way.

There is obviously a tension between combining multiple projects versus bidding tighter scopes . On the one hand you may get economies of scale for mobilization costs and general conditions, on the other hand you may reduce the pool of interested bidders by creating larger projects which are less appealing to smaller contractors due to various factors such as staffing, bonding capacity, etc. In this case, our judgement was that combining the two approved SCSA CapEx projects into one Request for Bid would not have resulted in an outcome that would have been more advantageous .

EMAIL #4: RE: Recommendation for a Bud2et Augmentation for the Levi's Stadium Insulation Cappin&
.,~,, ;

STADIUM

FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
• The budget amendment request is significantly higher than the budgeted CapEx project amount. How does this amount differ than the engineer estimate and what accounted for the difference (e.g., was the project scope expanded or did the area of work expand, etc.)? The Stadium Insulation Capping Project has an approved budget amount of$ 157,500 . The project scope was not expanded. The actual bid amount was $465,520 for a variance of $308,020 . The difference in the budget amount and the actual bid amount is accounted for by both the complexity of the access to the work site (specialized equipment), the labor hours determined by the Contractor needed to perform the project, and significant increases in construction costs in recent months .
• Can this request wait until the budget process since the procur ement process may take about the same time?
We can consider adding this request to the Fiscal Year 2022/23 SCSA Capex budget list, but deferring this project will result in a loss of 60-90 days of project lead time . We want to begin work in the February 2022 timeframe after the conclusion of the football season to avoid the stacking up of projects slated for 2022 . Lastly, 2022 is anticipated to be a busier event season compared to 2021. Therefore , our preference is to move forward with this request during the current approval window and preserve the bidder 's cost estimate and work schedule.

We hope that this update shows our continued good faith and commitm ent to addressing any and all outstanding comments or questions. Please place these items on the first available calendar in January 2022 . Thank you.

Sincerely,
xecutiv e Vice President & General Manager
Forty Niners Management Company
Cc: Compliance Manager
Ryan van Maarth, VP, Stadium Operations & Strategic Planning Jenti Vandertuig, Director, Procurem ent
fi:@tf ;

STADIUM

FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Attached:

1. Decembe r 8, 2021 email titl ed, "RE: Recommendation for Award - Rust Mitigation"

2. December 8, 2021 email titled , "RE: Recommendation for award for the Levi's Stadium Electrical Rooms Light Fixtu res Project"

3. December 81 2021 email titled, "RE: Recommendation for Award for the Luminaire Replacement Project"

4. December 14, 2021 email titled, "RE: Recommendation for a Budget Augmentation for the Levi's Stadium Insulation Capping"
Contract #: XXXXX
1 FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT

RUST PROTECTION MITIGATION PROJECT
BENT STEEL AT STADIUM PERIMETER – LEVEL 300

1. P ARTIES AND DATE.

This Contract is made and entered into this [***INSERT DAY***] day of [***INSERT MONTH***], [***INSERT YEAR***] by and between the Forty Niners Stadium Management Company LLC , a Delaware limited liability company ( “Stadium Manager”) and R. Brothers Painting, Inc., a Corporation with its principal place of business at 707 W. Hedding Street, San Jose, CA 95110 (“Contractor”). Stadium Manager and Contractor are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” in this Contract.

2. R ECITALS.

2.1 Stadium Manager. Stadium Manager seeks to contract for services necessary to achieve its purpose.

2.2 Contractor. Contractor desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain construction services required by the Stadium Manager on the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract. Contractor represents that it is duly licensed and experienced in providing lighting related construction services, that it and its employees or subcontractors have all necessary licenses and permits to perform the services in the State of California, and that it is familiar with the plans of Stadium Manager. The following license classifications are required for this Project: Class B - General Building or Class C-33 – Painting and Decorating

2.3 Project. Stadium Manager desires to engage Contractor to render such services for the Rust Protection Mitigation Project, Bent Steel at Stadium Perimeter – Level 300 (“Project”) as set forth in this Contract.

2.4 Project Documents & Certifications . Contractor has obtained, and delivers concurrently herewith, a performance bond, a payment bond, and all insurance documentation, as required by the Contract.

3. T ERMS

3.1 Incorporation of Documents. This Contract includes and hereby incorporates in full by reference the following documents, including all exhibits, drawings, specifications and documents therein, and attachments and addenda thereto:
• Services/Schedule (Exhibit “A”)
• Plans and Specifications (Exhibit “B”)
• Special Conditions (Exhibit “C”)
• Contractor’s Certificate Regarding Workers’ Compensation (Exhibit “D”) • Public Works Contractor Registration Certification (Exhibit “E”) • Payment and Performance Bonds (Exhibit “F”)
• Procurement and Contract Process Integrity and Conflict of Interest Guidelines (Exhibit “G”)
- -
Contract #: XXXXX
2 • Levi’s Stadium Jobsite Rules (Exhibit “H”)
• Addenda
• Change Orders executed by the Stadium Manager
• 2021 Edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (The Greenbook), Excluding Sections 1-9
• Notice Inviting Bids, if any
• Instructions to Bidders, if any
• Contractor’s Bid

3.2 Contractor’s Basic Obligation; Scope of Work. Contractor promises and agrees, at its own cost and expense, to furnish to the Stadium Manager all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately complete the Project, including all structures and facilities necessary for the Project or described in the Contract (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the “Work”), for a Total Contract Price as specified pursuant to this Contract. All Work shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with the above referenced documents, as well as the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The plans and specifications for the Work are further described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Special Conditions, if any, relating to the Work are described in Exhibit ”C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

3.2.1 Change in Scope of Work. Any change in the scope of the Work, method of performance, nature of materials or price thereof, or any other matter materially affecting the performance or nature of the Work shall not be paid for or accepted unless such change, addition or deletion is approved in writing by a valid change order executed by the Stadium Manager .

Should Contractor request a change order due to unforeseen circumstances affecting the performance of the Work , such request shall be made within five (5) business days of the date such circumstances are discovered or shall waive its right to request a change order due to such circumstances. If the Parties cannot agree on any change in price required by such chan ge in the Work, the Stadium Manager may direct the Contractor to proceed with the performance of the change on a time and materials basis.

3.2.2 Substitutions/”Or Equal ”. Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 3400(b), the Stadium Manager may make a fin ding that designates certain products, things, or services by specific brand or trade name. Unless specifically designated in this Contract, whenever any material, process, or article is indicated or specified by grade, patent, or proprietary name or by name of manufacturer, such Specifications shall be deemed to be used for the purpose of facilitating the description of the material, process or article desired and shall be deemed to be followed by the words “or equal.”
Contractor may, unless otherwise stated, offer for substitution any material, process or article which shall be substantially equal or better in every respect to that so indicated or specified in this Contract. However, the Stadium Manager may have adopted certain uniform standards for certain materials, processes and articles. Contractor shall submit requests, together with substantiating data, for substitution of any “or equal” material, process or article no later than 7 calendar days prior to the bid submission deadline set forth in the Notice Inviting Bids as it may be amended. Provisions regarding submission of “or equal” requests shall not in any way authorize an extension of time for performance of this Contract. If a proposed “or equal” substitution request is rejected or submitted untimely, Contractor shall be responsible for providing the specified material, process or article. The burden of proof as to the equality of any material, process or article shall rest with Contractor.

Contract #: XXXXX
3 The Stadium Manager has the complete and sole discretion to determine if a material, process or article is an “or equal” material, process or article that may be substituted.

Data required to substantiate requests for substitutions of an “or equal” material, process or article data shall include a signed affidavit from Contractor stating that, and describing how, the substituted “or equal” material, process or article is equivalent to that specified in every way except as listed on the affidavit. Substantiating data shall include any and all illustrations, specifications, and other relevant data including catalog information which describes the requested substituted “or equal” material, process or article, and substantiates that it is an “or equal” to the material, process or article. The substantiating data must also include information regarding the durability and lifecycle cost of the requested substituted “or equal” material, process or article. Failure to submit all the required substantiating data, including the signed affidavit, to the Stadium Manager in a timely fashion will result in the rejection of the proposed substitution.

Contractor shall bear all of the Stadium Manager’s costs associated with the review of substitution requests. Contractor shall be responsible for all costs related to a substituted “or equal” material, process or article. Contractor is directed to the Special Conditions and/or Services/Schedule exhibits attached hereto (if any) to review any findings made pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 3400.

3.3 Period of Performance.

3.3.1 Contract Time. Contractor shall perform and complete all Work under this Contract within 60 calendar days, beginning the effective date of the Notice to Proceed (“Contract Time”). Contractor shall perform its Work in strict accordance with any completion schedule, construction schedule or project milestones developed by the Stadium Manager. Such schedules or milestones may be included as part of Exhibits “A” or “B” attached hereto, or may be provided separately in writing to Contractor. Contractor agrees that if such Work is not completed within the aforementioned Contract Time and/or pursuant to any such completion schedule, construction schedule or project milestones developed pursuant to provisions of the Contract, it is understood, acknowledged and agreed that the Stadium Manager will suffer damage.

3.3.2 Force Majeure. Neither Stadium Manager nor Contractor shall be considered in default of this Contract for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non- performing party. For purposes of this Contract, such circumstances include but are not limited to, abnormal weather conditions; floods; earthquakes; fire; pandemics or epidemics; war; riots and other civil disturbances; strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns, and other labor disturbances; sabotage or judicial restraint. Should such circumstances occur, the non-performing party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Contract.

Contractor’s exclusive remedy in the event of delay covered under this Section shall be a non - compensable extension of the Contract Time.

3.3.3 Liquidated Damages. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.85, Contractor shall pay to the Stadium Manager as fixed and liquidated damages the sum of $100 per day for each a nd every calendar day of delay beyond the Contract Time or beyond any completion schedule, construction schedule or Project milestones established pursuant to the Contract.

3.4 Standard of Performance; Performance of Employees . Contractor shall perform all Work under this Contract in a skillful and workmanlike manner, and consistent with the Contract #: XXXXX
4 standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Contractor represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Work. Contractor warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Work assigned to them. Finally, Contractor represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Work, including any required business license, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Contract. Contractor shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the Stadium Manager, any work necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by Contractor’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee who is determined by the Stadium Manager to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the safety of persons or the Work, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Work in a manner acceptable to the Stadium M anager, shall be promptly removed from the Project by Contractor and shall not be re-employed on the Work.

3.5 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Contractual Relationship. Stadium Manager retains Contractor on an independent contractor basis and Contractor is not an employee of Stadium Manager. Any additional personnel performing the work governed by this Contract on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Contractor shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance under this Contract and as required by law. Contractor shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

3.6 Stadium Manager’s Basic Obligation . Stadium Manager agrees to engage and does hereby engage Contractor as an independent contractor to furnish all materials and to perform all Work according to the terms and conditions herein contained for the sum set forth above. Except as otherwise provided in the Contr act, the Stadium Manager shall pay to Contractor, as full consideration for the satisfactory performance by Contractor of the services and obligations required by this Contract, the below-referenced compensation in accordance with compensation provisions set forth in the Contract.

3.7 Compensation and Payment.

3.7.1 Amount of Compensation. As consideration for performance of the Work required herein, Stadium Manager agrees to pay Contractor the Total Contract Price of _________________ Dollars ($ _________.00) (“Total Contract Price ”) provided that such amount shall be subject to adjustment pursuant to the applicable terms of this Contract or written change orders approved and signed in advance by the Stadium Manager.

3.7.2 Payment of Compensation. If the Work is scheduled for completion in thirty (30) or less calendar days, Stadium Manager will arrange for payment of the Total Contract Price upon completion and approval by Stadium Manager of the Work. If the Work is scheduled for completion in more than thirty (30) calendar days, Stadium Manager will pay Contractor on a monthly basis as provided for herein. On or before the fifth (5th) day of each month, Contractor shall submit to the Stadium Manager an itemized application for payment in the format suppli ed by the Stadium Manager indicating the amount of Work completed since commencement of the Work or since the last progress payment. These applications shall be supported by evidence which is required by this Contract and such other documentation as the Stadium Manager may require. The Contractor shall certify that the Work for which payment is requested has been done -
Contract #: XXXXX
5 and that the materials listed are stored where indicated. Contractor may be required to furnish a detailed schedule of values upon request of the Stadium Manager and in such detail and form as the Stadium Manager shall request, showing the quantities, unit prices, overhead, profit, and all other expenses involved in order to provide a basis for determining the amount of progress payments.

3.7.3 Prompt Payment . Stadium Manager shall review and pay all progress payment requests in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 20104.50 of the California Public Contract Code. However, no progress payments will be made for Work not compl eted in accordance with this Contract. Contractor shall comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations relating to the proper payment of its employees, subcontractors, suppliers or others.

3.7.4 Contract Retentions. From each approved progress estimate, five percent (5%) will be deducted and retained by the Stadium Manager, and the remainder will be paid to Contractor. All Contract retention shall be released and paid to Contractor and subcontractors pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 7107.

3.7.5 Other Deductions and Withholdings. In addition to Contract retentions, the Stadium Manager may deduct from each progress payment an amount necessary to protect Stadium Manager from loss because of: (1) liquidated damages which have accrued as of the date of the application for payment; (2) any sums expended by the Stadium Manager in performing any of Contractor’s obligations under the Contract which Contractor has failed to perform or has performed inadequately; (3) defective Work not remedied; (4) stop notices as allowed by state law; (5) reasonable doubt that the Work can be completed for the unpaid balance of the Total Contract Price or within the scheduled completion date; (6) unsatisfactory prosecution of the Work by Contractor; (7) unauthorized deviations from the Contract; (8) failure of Contractor to maintain or submit on a timely basis proper and sufficient documentation as required by the Contract or by Stadium Manager during the prosecution of the Work; (9) erroneous or false estimates by Contractor of the value of the Work performed; (10) any sums representing expenses, losses, or damages as determined by the Stadium Manager, incurred by the Stadium Manager for which Contractor is liable under the Contract; and (11) any other sums which the Stadium Manager is entitled to recover from Contractor under the terms of the Contract or pursuant to state law, including Section 1727 of the California Labor Code. The failure by the Stadium Manager to deduct any of these sums from a progress payment shall not constitute a waiver of the Stadium Manager’s right to such sums.

3.7.6 Substitutions for Contract Retentions. In accordance with California Public Contract Code Section 22300, the Stadium Manager will permit the substitution of securities for any monies withheld by the Stadium Manager to ensure performance under the Contract. At the request and expense of Contractor, securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with the Stadium Manager, or with a state or federally chartered bank in California as the escrow agent, and thereafter the Stadium Manager shall then pay such monies to Contractor as they come due. Upon satisfactory completion of the Contract, the securities shall be returned to Contractor. For purposes of this Section and Section 22300 of the Public Contract Code, the term “satisfactory completion of the contract ” shall mean the time the Stadium Manager has issued written final acceptance of the Work and filed a Notice of Completion as required by law and provisions of this Contract. Contractor shall be the beneficial owner of any securities substituted for monies withheld and shall receive any interest thereon. The escrow agreement used for the purposes of this Section shall be in the form provided by the Stadium Manager.

Contract #: XXXXX
6 3.7.7 Title to Work. As security for partial, progress, or other payments, title to Work for which such payments are made shall pass to the Stadium Manager at the time of payment. To the extent that title has not previously been vested in the Stadium Manager by reason of payments, full title shall pass to the Stadium Manager at delivery of the Work at the destination and time specified in this Contract. Such transferred title shall in each case be good, free and clear from any and all security interests, liens, or other encumbrances. Contractor promises and agrees that it will not pledge, hypothecate, or otherwise encumber the items in any manner that would result in any lien, security interest, charge, or claim upon or against said items.

Such transfer of title shall not imply acceptance by the Stadium Manager, nor relieve Contractor from the responsibility to strictly comply with the Contract, and shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility for any loss of or damage to items.

3.7.8 Labor and Material Releases . Contractor shall furnish Stadium Manager with labor and material releases from all subcontractors performing work on, or furnishing materials for, the Work governed by this Contract prior to final payment by Stadium Manager.

3.7.9 Prevailing Wages. Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., and 1770 et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. Since the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works ” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and since the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Stadium Manager shall provide Contractor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Contract upon request . Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at Contractor’s principal place of business and at the project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the Indemnified Parties (defined below) free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. Contractor and any subcontractor shall forfeit a penalty of up to $200 per calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid less than the prevailing wage rates.

3.7.10 Apprenticeable Crafts. When Contractor employs workmen in an apprenticeable craft or trade, Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the California Labor Code with respect to the employment of properly registered apprentices upon public works. The primary responsibility for compliance with said Section for all apprenticeable occupations shall be with Contractor. The Contractor or any subcontractor that is determined by the Labor Commissioner to have knowingly violated Section 1777.5 shall forfeit as a civil penalty an amount not exceeding $100 for each full calendar day of noncompliance, or such greater amount as provided by law.

3.7.11 Hours of Work. Contractor is advised that eight (8) hours labor constitutes a legal day’s work. Pursuant to Section 1813 of the California Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit a penalty of $25.00 per worker for each day that each worker is permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week, except when payment for overtime is made at not less than one and one -half (1-1/2) times the basic rate for that worker.

3.7.12 Payroll Records. Contractor and each subcontractor shall keep an accurate payroll record, showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, Contract #: XXXXX
7 straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by him or her in connection with the public work. The payroll records shall be certified and shall be available for inspection at all reasonable hours at the principal office of Contractor in the manner provided in Labor Code Section 1776. In the event of noncompliance with the requirements of this Section, Contractor shall have 10 days in which to comply subsequent to receipt of written notice specifying in what respects such Contractor must comply with this Section. Should noncompliance still be evident after such 10-day period, Contractor shall, as a penalty to Stadium Manager, forfeit not more than $100.00 for each calendar day or portion thereof, for each worker, until strict compliance is effectuated. The amount of the forfeiture is to be determined by the Labor Commissioner. A contractor who is found to have violated the provisions of law regarding wages on public works with the intent to defraud shall be ineligible to bid on public works contracts for a period of one to three years as determined by the Labor Commissioner. Upon the request of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards or the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, such penalti es shall be withheld from progress payments then due. The responsibility for compliance with this Section is on Contractor. The requirement to submit certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code Section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Section 1771.4.

3.7.13 Contractor and Subcontractor Registration. Pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, all contractors and subcontractors that wish to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, or enter into a contract to perform public work must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. No bid will be accepted nor any contract entered into without proof of the contractor’s and subcontractors’ current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations to perform public work. Contractor is directed to review, fill out and execute the Public Works Contractor Registration Certification attached hereto as Exhibit “E” prior to contract execution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1.

3.7.14 Proof of Compliance. It shall be Contractor’s sole responsibility to comply with, and maintain adequate records of its adherence to, all applicable state prevailing wage requirement. Proof of such compliance may include proof of Contractor and subcontractor registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, California certified payroll form A -131, statements of non -performance for work not undertaken at any point during the Project, DAS 140/142 forms for all apprenticeable crafts or trades, proper fringe benefits statements, and any other such documents that may be required under this Section 3.7. At any time during or subsequent to the full performance of the services under this Agreement, Stadium Manager and/or the Santa Clara Stadium Authority may require Contractor to produce complete and adequate compliance records, subject to Stadium Manager and/or the Santa Clara Stadium Authority’s satisfaction, prior to release of payment.

3.7.15 Labor Compliance; Stop Orders . This Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be the Contractor’s sole responsibility to evaluate and pay the cost of complying with all labor compliance requirements under this Contract and applicable law. Any stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Contractor or any subcontractor that affect Contractor’s performance of Work, including any delay, shall be Contractor’s sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered Contractor caused delay Contract #: XXXXX
8 subject to any applicable liquidated damages and shall not be compensable by the Stadium Manager. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the Indemnified Parties free and harmless from any claim or liability aris ing out of stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Contractor or any subcontractor.

3.8 Performance of Work; Jobsite Obligations.

3.8.1 Water Quality Management and Compliance.

3.8.1.1 Water Quality Management and Compliance. Contractor shall keep itself and all subcontractors, staff, and employees fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations that may impact, or be implicated by the performance of the Work including, without limitation, all applicable provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. §§ 1300); the California Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Cal Water Code §§ 13000- 14950); local ordinances regulating discharges of storm water; and any and all regulations, policies, or permits issued pursuant to any such authority regulating the discharge of pollutants, as that term is used in the Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act, to any ground or surface water in the State.

3.8.1.2 Compliance with the Statewide Construction General Permit. Contractor shall comply with all conditions of the most recent iteration of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity, issued by the California State Water Resources Control Board (“Permit”). It shall be Contractor’s sole responsibility to file a Notice of Intent and procure coverage under the Permit for all construction activity which results in the disturbance of more than one acre of total land area or which is part of a larger common area of development or sale. Prior to initiating work, Contractor shall be solely responsible for preparing and implementing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as required by the Permit. Contractor shall be responsible for procuring, implementing and complying with the provisions of the Permit and the SWPPP, including the standard provisions, and monitoring and reporting requirements as required by the Permit. The Permit requires the SWPPP to be a “living document” that changes as necessary to meet the conditions and requirements of the job site as it progresses through difference phases of construction and is subject to different weather conditions. It shall be Contractor’s sole responsibility to update the SWPPP as necessary to address conditions at the project site.

3.8.1.3 Other Water Quality Rules Regulations and Policies.

Contractor shall comply with the lawful requirements of any applicable municipality, drainage Stadium Manager, or local agency regarding discharges of storm water to separate storm drain systems or other watercourses under their jurisdiction, including applicable requirements in municipal storm water management programs.

3.8.1.4 Cost of Compliance. Storm, surface, nuisance, or other waters may be encountered at various times during construction of the Work. Therefore, the Contractor, by submitting a Bid, hereby acknowledges that it has investigated the risk arising from such waters, has prepared its Bid accordingly, and assumes any and all risks and liabilities arising therefrom.

3.8.1.5 Liability for Non -Compliance. Failure to comply with the Permit is a violation of federal and state law. Pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Contract, Contractor hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Indemnified Contract #: XXXXX
9 Parties for any alleged violations. In addition, Stadium Manager may seek damages from Contractor for any delay in completing the Work in accordance with the Contract, if such delay is caused by or related to Contractor’s failure to comply with the Permit.

3.8.1.6 Reservation of Right to Defend. Stadium Manager reserves the right to defend any enforcement action brought against the Stadium Manager for Contractor’s failure to comply with the Permit or any other relevant water quality law, regulation, or policy.

Pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Contract, Contractor hereby agrees to be bound by, and to reimburse the Stadium Manager for the costs (including the Stadium Manager ’s attorney’s fees) associated with, any settlement reached between the Stadium Manager and the relevant enforcement entity.

3.8.1.7 Training. In addition to the standard of performance requirements set forth in paragraph 3.4, Contractor warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Work assigned to them without impacting water quality in violation of the laws, regulations and policies described in paragraph 3.8.1. Contractor further warrants that it, its employees and subcontractors will receive adequate training, as determined by Stadium Manager, regarding the requirements of the laws, regulations and policies described in paragraph 3.8.1 as they may relate to the Work provided under this Agreement. Upon request, Stadium Manager will provide the Contractor with a list of training programs that meet the requirements of this paragraph.

3.8.2 Safety. Contractor shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. Contractor shall comply with the requirements of the specifications relating to safety measures applicable in particular operations or kinds of work. In carrying out its Work, Contractor shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the Work and the conditions under which the Work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to, adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment; adequate illumination for underground and night operations; instructions in accident prevention for all employees, such as machinery guards, safe walkways, scaffolds, ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, fall protection and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. Furthermore, Contractor shall prominently display the names and telephone numbers of at least two medical doctors practicing in the vicinity of the Project, as well as the telephone number of the local ambulance service, adjacent to all telephones at the Project site.

3.8.3 Laws and Regulations. Contractor shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Contract or the Work, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Contractor shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Work. If Contractor observes that the drawings or specifications are at variance with any law, rule or regulation, it shall promptly notify the Stadium Manager in writing. Any necessary changes shall be made by written change order. Stadium Manager shall further comply wit h all requirements specified in the Stadium Manager’s Procurement and Contract Process Integrity and Conflict of Interest Guidelines, which are attached hereto as Exhibit “G” and incorporated herein by this reference. If Contractor performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the Stadium Manager , Contractor shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Stadium Manager is subject Contract #: XXXXX
10 to certain provisions of the Health & Safety Code, Government Code, Public Contract Code, and Labor Code of the State. It is stipulated and agreed that all provisions of the law applicable to the public contracts of a municipality are a part of this Contract to the same extent as though set forth herein and will be complied with. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the Indemnified Parties (defined below) free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Contract, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.8.4 Permits and Licenses. Contractor shall be responsible for securing Stadium Manager permits and licenses necessary to perform the Work described herein, including, but not limited to, any required business license. While Contractor will not be charged a fee for any Stadium Manager permits, Contractor shall pay the Stadium Manager’s business license fee, if any. Any ineligible contractor or subcontractor pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1777.1 and 1777.7 may not perform work on this Project.

3.8.5 Trenching Work. If the Total Contract Price exceeds $25,000 and if the Work governed by this Contract entails excavation of any trench or trenches five (5) feet or more in depth, Contractor shall comply with all applicable provisions of the California Labor Code, including Section 6705. To this end, Contractor shall submit for Stadium Manager’s review and approval a detailed plan showing the design of shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection from the hazard of caving ground during the excavation of such trench or trenches. If such plan varies from the shoring system standards, the plan shall be prepared by a registered civil or structural engineer.

3.8.6 Hazardous Materials and Differing Conditions. As required by California Public Contract Code Section 7104, if this Contract involves digging trenches or other excavations that extend deeper than four (4) feet below the surface, Contractor shall promptly, and prior to disturbance of any conditions, notify Stadium Manager of: (1) any material discovered in excavation that Contractor believes to be a hazardous waste that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II or Class III disposal site; (2) subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated by Stadium Manager; and (3) unknown physical conditions of an unusual nature at the site, significantly different from those ordinarily encountered in such contract work. Upon notification, Stadium Manager shall promptly investigate the conditions to determine whether a change order is appropriate. In the event of a dispute, Contractor shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date and shall proceed with all Work to be performed under the Contract, but shall retain all rights provided by the Contract or by law for making protests and resolving the dispute.

3.8.7 Underground Utility Facilities. To the extent required by Section 4215 of the California Government Code, Stadium Manager shall compensate Contractor for the costs of:
(1) locating and repairing damage to underground utility facilities not caused by the failure of Contractor to exercise reasonable care; (2) removing or relocating underground utility faciliti es not indicated in the construction drawings; and (3) equipment necessarily idled during such work.

Contractor shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay caused by failure of Stadium Manager to provide for removal or relocation of such utility facilities.

3.8.8 Air Quality. Contractor must fully comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in furnishing or using equipment and/or providing services, including, but not limited to, emissions limits and permitting requirements imposed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Although CARB limits and requirements are more broad, Contractor shall specifically be aware of their application to “portable equipment”, which definition is considered by CARB to Contract #: XXXXX
11 include any item of equipment with a fuel- powered engine. Contractor shall indemnify the Indemnified Parties (defined below) against any fines or penalties imposed by CARB, or any other governmental or regulatory agency for violations of applicable laws, rules and/or regulations by Contractor, its subcontractors, or others for whom Contractor is responsible under its indemnity obligations provided for in this Agreement.

3.8.9 State Recycling Mandates. Contractor shall comply with State Recycling Mandates. Any recyclable materials/debris collected by the contractor that can be feasibly diverted via reuse or recycling must be hauled by the appropriate handler for reuse or recycling.

3.9 Completion of Work. When Contractor determines that it has completed the Work required herein, Contractor shall so notify Stadium Manager in writing and shall furnish all labor and material releases required by this Contract. Stadium Manager shall thereupon inspect the Work. If the Work is not acceptable to the Stadium Manager, the Stadium Manager shall indicate to Contractor in writing the specific portions or items of Work which are unsatisfactory or incomplete. Once Contractor determines that it has completed the incomplete or unsatisfactory Work, Contractor may request a reinspection by the Stadium Manager . Once the Work is acceptable to Stadium Manager, Stadium Manager shall pay to Contractor the Total Contract Price remaining to be paid, less any amount which Stadium Manager may be authorized or directed by law to retain. Payment of retention proceeds due to Contractor shall be made in accordance with Section 7107 of the California Public Contract Code.

3.10 Claims; Government Code Claim Compliance.

3.10.1 Intent. Effective January 1, 1991, Section 20104 et seq., of the California Public Contract Code prescribes a process utilizing informal conferences, non -binding judicial supervised mediation, and judicial arbitration to resolve disputes on construction claims of $375,000 or less. Effective January 1, 2017, Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code prescribes a process for negotiation and mediation to resolve disputes on construction claims. The intent of this Section is to implement Sections 20104 et seq. and Section 9204 of the California Public Contract Code. This Section shall be construed to be consistent with said statutes.

3.10.2 Claims. For purposes of this Section, “Claim” means a separate demand by the Contractor, after a change order duly requested in accordance with the terms of this Contract has been denied by the Stadium Manager, for (A) a time extension, (B) payment of money or damages arising from Work done by or on behalf of the Contractor pursuant to the Contract, or (C) an amount the payment of which is disputed by the Stadium Manager. A “Claim” does not include any demand for payment for which the Contractor has failed to provide notice, request a change order, or otherwise failed to follow any procedures contained in the Contract .

Claims governed by this Section may not be filed unless and until the Contractor completes all procedures for giving notice of delay or change and for the requesting of a time extension or change order, including but not necessarily limited to the change order procedures contained herein, and Contractor’s request for a change has been denied in whole or in part. Claims governed by this Section must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after a request for change has been denied in whole or in part or after any other event giving rise to the Claim. The Claim shall be submitted in writing to the Stadium Manager and shall include on its first page the following in 16 point capital font: “THIS IS A CLAIM. ” Furthermore, the claim shall include the documents necessary to substantiate the claim. Nothing in this Section is intended to extend the time limit or supersede notice requirements otherwise provided by contract for the filing of claims, including all requirements pertaining to compensation or payment for extra Work, disputed Work, Contract #: XXXXX
12 and/or changed conditions. Failure to follow such contractual requirements shall bar any claims or subsequent lawsuits for compensation or payment thereon.

3.10.3 Supporting Documentation. The Contractor shall submit all claims in the following format:

3.10.3.1 Summary of claim merit and price, reference Contract provisions pursuant to which the claim is made

3.10.3.2 List of documents relating to claim:
(A) Specifications
(B) Drawings
(C) Clarifications (Requests for Information)
(D) Schedules
(E) Other

3.10.3.3 Chronology of events and correspondence

3.10.3.4 Analysis of claim merit

3.10.3.5 Analysis of claim cost

3.10.3.6 Time impact analysis in CPM format

3.10.3.7 If Contractor’s claim is based in whole or in part on an allegation of errors or omissions in the Drawings or Specifications for the Project, Contractor shall provide a summary of the percentage of the claim subject to design errors or omissions and shall obtain a certificate of merit in support of the claim of design errors and omissions.

3.10.3.8 Cover letter and certification of validity of the claim, including any claims from subcontractors of any tier, in accordance with Government Code Section 12650 et seq.

3.10.4 Stadium Manager’s Response. Upon receipt of a claim pursuant to this Section, Stadium Manager shall conduct a reasonable review of the claim and, within a period not to exceed 45 days, shall provide the Contractor a written statement identifying what portion of the claim is disputed and what portion is undisputed. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim will be processed and made within 60 days after the Stadium Manager issues its written statement.

3.10.4.1 If Stadium Manager needs approval from its governing body to provide the Contractor a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion of the claim, and the governing body does not meet within the 45 days or within the mutually agreed to extension of time following receipt of a claim sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, Stadium Manager shall have up to three days following the next duly publicly noticed meeting of the governing body after the 45-day period, or extension, expires Contract #: XXXXX
13 to provide the Contractor a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion.

3.10.4.2 Within 30 days of receipt of a claim, Stadium Manager may request in writing additional documentation supporting the claim or relating to defenses or claims Stadium Manager may have against the Contractor. If additional information is thereafter required, it shall be requested and provided pursuant to this subdivision, upon mutual agreement of Stadium Manager and the Contractor.

3.10.4.3 Stadium Manager’s written response to the claim, as further documented, shall be submitted to the Contractor within 30 days (if the claim is less than $50,000, within 15 days) after receipt of the further documentation, or within a period of time no greater than that taken by the Contractor in producing the additional information or requested documentation, whichever is greater.

3.10.5 Meet and Confer . If the Contractor disputes Stadium Manager’s written response, or Stadium Manager fails to respond within the time prescribed, the Contractor may so notify Stadium Manager, in writing, either within 15 days of receipt of Stadium Manager ’s response or within 15 days of Stadium Manager’s failure to respond within the time prescribed, respectively, and demand an informal conference to meet and confer for settlement of the issues in dispute. Upon receipt of a demand, Stadium Manager shall schedule a meet and confer conference within 30 days for settlement of the dispute.

3.10.6 Mediation. Within 10 business days following the conclusion of the meet and confer conference, if the claim or any portion of the claim remains in dispute, Stadium Manager shall provide the Contractor a written statement identifying the portion of the claim that remains in dispute and the portion that is undisputed. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim shall be processed and made within 60 days after Stadium Manager issues its written statement. Any disputed portion of the claim, as identified by the Contractor in writing, shall be submitted to nonbinding mediation, with Stadium Manager and the Contractor sharing the associated costs equally. Stadium Manager and Contractor shall mutually agree to a mediator within 10 business days after the disputed portion of the claim has been identified in writing, unless the parties agree to select a mediator at a later time.

3.10.6.1 If the Parties cannot agree upon a mediator, each P arty shall select a mediator and those mediators shall select a qualified neutral third party to mediate with regard to the disputed portion of the claim. Each Party shall bear the fees and costs charged by its respective mediator in connection with the selection of the neutral mediator.

3.10.6.2 For purposes of this Section, mediation includes any nonbinding process, including, but not limited to, neutral evaluation or a dispute review board, in which an independent third party or board assists the Parties in dispute resolution through negotiation or by issuance of an evaluation. Any mediation utilized shall conform to the timeframes in this Section.

3.10.6.3 Unless otherwise agreed to by Stadium Manager and the Contractor in writing, the mediation conducted pursuant to this Section shall excuse any further obligation under Section 20104.4 to mediate after litigation has been commenced.

3.10.6.4 The mediation shall be held no earlier than the date the Contractor completes the Work or the date that the Contractor last performs Work, whichever is Contract #: XXXXX
14 earlier. All unresolved claims shall be considered jointly in a single mediation, unless a new unrelated claim arises after mediation is completed.

3.10.7 Procedures After Mediation. If following the mediation, the c laim or any portion remains in dispute, the Contractor must file a claim pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 900) and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 910) of Part 3 of Division 3.6 of Title 1 of the Government Code. For purposes of those provisions, the running of the period of time within which a claim must be filed shall be tolled from the time the Contractor submits his or her written claim pursuant to subdivision (a) until the time the claim is denied, including any period of time utilized by the meet and confer conference or mediation.

3.10.8 Civil Actions. The following procedures are established for all civil actions filed to resolve claims subject to this Section:

3.10.8.1 Within 60 days, but no earlier than 30 days, following the filing or responsive pleadings, the court shall submit the matter to non -binding mediation unless waived by mutual stipulation of both parties or unless mediation was held prior to commencement of the action in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 9204 and the terms of these procedures. The mediation process shall provide for the selection within 15 days by both parties of a disinterested third person as mediator, shall be commenced within 30 days of the submittal, and shall be concluded within 15 day s from the commencement of the mediation unless a time requirement is extended upon a good cause showing to the court.

3.10.8.2 If the matter remains in dispute, the case shall be submitted to judicial arbitration pursuant to Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 1141.10) of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, notwithstanding Section 1114.11 of that code. The Civil Discovery Act of 1986 (Article 3 (commencing with Section 2016) of Chapter 3 of Title 3 of Part 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure) shall apply to any proceeding brought under this subdivision consistent with the rules pertaining to judicial arbitration.

3.10.8.3 In addition to Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 1141.10) of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (A) arbitrators shall, when possible, be experienced in construction law, and (B) any party appealing an arbitration award who does not obtain a more favorable judgment shall, in addition to payment of costs and fees under that chapter, also pay the attorney’s fees on appeal of the other party.

3.10.9 Government Code Claims. In addition to any and all contract requirements pertaining to notices of and requests for compensation or payment for extra work, disputed work, claims and/or changed conditions, Contractor must comply with the claim procedures set forth in Government Code Sections 900 et seq. prior to filing any lawsuit against the Stadium Manager .

Such Government Code claims and any subsequent lawsuit based upon the Government Code claims shall be limited to those matters that remain unresolved after all procedures pert aining to extra work, disputed work, claims, and/or changed conditions have been followed by Contractor.

If no such Government Code claim is submitted, or if any prerequisite contractual requirements are not otherwise satisfied as specified herein, Contractor shall be barred from bringing and maintaining a valid lawsuit against the Stadium Manager. A Government Code claim must be filed no earlier than the date the work is completed or the date the Contractor last performs work on the Project, whichever occurs first. A Government Code claim shall be inclusive of all unresolved claims unless a new unrelated claim arises after the Government Code claim is submitted.

Contract #: XXXXX
15 3.10.10 Non-Waiver. Stadium Manager’s failure to respond to a claim from the Contractor within the time periods described in this Section or to otherwise meet the time requirements of this Section shall result in the claim being deemed rejected in its entirety. Stadium Manager’s failure to respond shall not waive Stadium Manager’s rights to any subsequent procedures for the resolution of disputed claims.

3.11 Loss and Damage. Except as may otherwise be limited by law, Contractor shall be responsible for all loss and damage which may arise out of the nature of the Work agreed to herein, or from the action of the elements, or from any unforeseen difficulties which may arise or be encountered in the prosecution of the Work until the same is fully completed and accepted by Stadium Manager. In the event of damage proximately caused by an Act of God, as defined by Section 7105 of the Public Contract Code, the Stadium Manager may terminate this Contract pursuant to Section 3.17.3; provided, however, that the Stadium Manager needs to provide Contractor with only one (1) day advanced written notice.

3.12 Indemnification.

3.12.1 Scope of Indemnity . To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the Stadium Manager, Forty Niners SC Stadium Company LLC, Forty Niners Football Company LLC, the Santa Clara Stadium Authority, the City of Santa Clara, their affiliates, and each of their respective officers, directors, managers, members, partners, owners, employees, agents and authorized volunteers, each tenant and event promoter of Levi’s Stadium, and any mortgagee, bond trustee or other financial institution from time to time holding a line or indenture upon an interest in Levi’s Stadium, and each of them (collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”), free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, suits, actions, proceedings, costs, expenses, liability, judgments, awards, decrees, settlements, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, (collectively, “Claims”) in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Contractor, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Contractor’s services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages, expert witness fees and attorneys’ fees and other related costs and expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782, Contractor’s indemnity obligation shall not apply to liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or any other loss, damage or expense arising from the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties or the Indemnified Parties’ agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to the Indemnified Parties , or for defects in design furnished by those persons.

3.12.2 Additional Indemnity Obligations . Contractor shall defend, with counsel of Stadium Manager’s choosing and at Contractor's own cost, expense and risk, any and all Claims covered by this Section that may be brought or instituted against the Indemnified Parties. In addition, Contractor shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against the Indemnified Parties as part of any such claim, suit, action or other proceeding. Contractor shall also reimburse the Indemnified Parties for the cost of any settlement paid by the Indemnified Parties as part of any such claim, suit, action or other proceeding. Such reimbursement shall include payment for the Indemnified Parties' attorney's fees and costs, including expert witness fees. Contractor shall reimburse the Indemnified Parties for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Contractor's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Indemnified Parties.

Contract #: XXXXX
16 3.13 Insurance.

3.13.1 Time for Compliance. Contractor shall not commence Work under this Contract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Stadium Manager that it has secured all insurance required under this Section. In addition, Contractor shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Stadium Manager that the subcontractor has secured all insurance required under this Section. Failure to provide and maintain all required insurance shall be grounds for the Stadium Manager to terminate this Contract for cause.

3.13.2 Minimum Requirements. Contractor shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Work hereunder by Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Contractor shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Contract. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage:

3.13.2.1 Minimum Scope of Insurance . Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 00 01) OR Insurance Services Office Owners and Contractors Protective Liability Coverage Form (CG 00 09 11 88) (coverage for operations of designated contractor); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form number CA 00 01, code 1 (any auto); and (3) Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability: Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance. Policies shall not contain exclusions contrary to this Contract.

3.13.2.2 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall m aintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage; (2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability: Workers’ compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California.

Employer’s Liability limits of $1,000,000 each accident, policy limit bodily injury or disease, and each employee bodily injury or disease. Defense costs shall be available in addition to the limits.

Notwithstanding the minimum limits specified herein, any available coverage shall be provided to the parties required to be named as additional insureds pursuant to this Contract.

3.13.3 Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Contractor shall provide endorsements (amendments) on forms supplied or approved by the Stadium Manager to add the following provisions to the insurance policies:

3.13.3.1 General Liability. (1) Such policy shall give the Stadium Manager, its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers additional insured status using ISO endorsements CG20 10 10 01 plus CG20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage, with respect to the Work or operations performed by or on behalf of Contractor, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work; (2) all policies shall waive or shall permit Contractor to waive all rights of subrogation which may be obtained by the Contractor or any insurer by virtue of payment of any loss or any coverage provided to any person named as an additional insured pursuant to this Contract, and Contractor agrees to waive all such rights of subrogation; and (3) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Stadium Manager , its officials, employees, agents and authorized Contract #: XXXXX
17 volunteers, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of Contractor’s scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the Stadium Manager, its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers shall be ex cess of Contractor’s insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it.

3.13.3.2 Automobile Liability. (1) Such policy shall give the Stadium Manager, its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers additional insured status with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor or for which Contractor is responsible; (2) all policies shall waive or shall permit Contractor to waive all rights of subrogation which may be obtained by the Contractor or any insurer by virtue of payment of any loss or any coverage provided to any person named as an additional insured pursuant to this Contract, and Contractor agrees to waive all such rights of subrogation; and (3) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Stadium Manager, its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of Contractor’s scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the Stadium Manager, its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers shall be excess of Contractor’s insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way.

3.13.3.3 Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability Coverage.

The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Stadium Manager, its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by Contractor.

3.13.3.4 All Coverages . Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that: (1) coverage shall not be suspended, voided, reduced or canceled except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the Stadium Manager; and (2) any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the Stadium Manager, its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers.

3.13.4 Separation of Insureds; No Special Limitations. All insurance required by this Section shall contain standard separation of insureds provisions. In addition, such insurance shall not contain any special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Stadium Manager, its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers.

3.13.5 Deductibles and Self-Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Stadium Manager. Contractor shall guarantee that, at the option of the Stadium Manager, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the Stadium Manager , its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers; or (2) the Contractor shall procure a bond or other financial guarantee acceptable to the Stadium Manager guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses.

3.13.6 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating no less than A:VII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the Stadium Manager. Exception may be made for the State Compensation Insurance Fund when not specifically rated.

3.13.7 Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish Stadium Manager with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Contract #: XXXXX
18 Contract on forms satisfactory to the Stadium Manager. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, and shall be on forms supplied or approved by the Stadium Manager . All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the Stadium Manager before work commences. The Stadium Manager reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

3.13.8 Subcontractors. All subcontractors shall meet the requirements of this Section before commencing Work. Contractor shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. Subcontractor policies of General Liability insurance shall name the Stadium Manager , its officials, employees, agents and authorized volunteers as additional insureds using form ISO 20 38 04 13 or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein except as otherwise agreed to by the Stadium Manager in writing.

3.13.9 Reporting of Claims . Contractor shall report to the Stadium Manager, in addition to Contractor’s insurer, any and all insurance claims submitted by Contractor in connection with the Work under this Contract.

3.14 Bond Requirements.

3.14.1 Payment Bond. If required by law or otherwise specifically requested by Stadium Manager in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, Contractor shall execute and provide to Stadium Manager concurrently with this Contract a Payment Bond in an amount required by the Stadium Manager and in a form provided or approved by the Stadium Manager. If such bond is required, no payment will be made to Contractor until the bond has been received and approved by the Stadium Manager.

3.14.2 Performance Bond. If specifically requested by Stadium Manager in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, Contractor shall execute and provide to Stadium Manager concurrently with this Contract a Performance Bond in an amount required by the Stadium Manager and in a form provided or approved by the Stadium Manager . If such bond is required, no payment will be made to Contractor until the bond has been received and approved by the Stadium Manager.

3.14.3 Bond Provisions. Should, in Stadium Manager’s sole opinion, any bond become insufficient or any surety be found to be unsatisfactory, Contractor shall renew or replace the effected bond within (ten) 10 days of receiving notice from Stadium Manag er. In the event the surety or Contractor intends to reduce or cancel any required bond, at least thirty (30) days prior written notice shall be given to the Stadium Manager, and Contractor shall post acceptable replacement bonds at least ten (10) days prior to expiration of the original bonds. No further payments shall be deemed due or will be made under this Contract until any replacement bonds required by this Section are accepted by the Stadium Manager. To the extent, if any, that the Total Contract Price is increased in accordance with the Contract, Contractor shall, upon request of the Stadium Manager, cause the amount of the bond to be increased accordingly and shall promptly deliver satisfactory evidence of such increase to the Stadium Manager . If Contractor fails to furnish any required bond, the Stadium Manager may terminate the Contract for cause.

3.14.4 Surety Qualifications. Only bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in California Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.120, shall be accepted. If a California-admitted surety insurer issuing bonds does not meet these requirements, the insurer Contract #: XXXXX
19 will be considered qualified if it is in conformance with Section 995.660 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and proof of such is provided to the Stadium Manager.

3.15 Warranty. Contractor warrants all Work under the Contract (which for purposes of this Section shall be deemed to include unauthorized work which has not been removed and any non-conforming materials incorporated into the Work) to be of good quality and free from any defective or faulty material and workmanship. Contractor agrees that for a period of two years (or the period of time specified elsewhere in the Contract or in any guarantee or warranty provided by any manufacturer or supplier of equipment or materials incorporated into the Work, whichever is later) after the date of final acceptance, Contractor shall within ten (10) days after being notified in writing by the Stadium Manager of any defect in the Work or non-conformance of the Work to the Contract, commence and prosecute with due diligence all Work necessary to fulfill the terms of the warranty at its sole cost and expense. Contractor shall act sooner as requested by the Stadium Manager in response to an emergency. In addition, Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, repair and replace any portions of the Work (or work of other contractors) damaged by its defective Work or which becomes damaged in the course of repairing or replacing defective Work. For any Work so corrected, Contractor’s obligation hereunder to correct defective Work shall be reinstated for an additional one-year period, commencing with the date of acceptance of such corrected Work. Contractor shall perform such tests as the Stadium Manager may require to verify that any corrective actions, including, without limitation, redesign, repairs, and replacements comply with the requirements of the Contract. All costs associated with such corrective actions and testing, including the removal, replacement, and reinstitution of equipment and materials necessary to gain access, shall be the sole responsibility of Contractor. All warranties and guarantees of subcontractors, suppliers and manufacturers with respect to any portion of the Work, whether express or implied, are deemed to be obtained by Contractor for the benefit of the Stadium Manager , regardless of whether or not such warranties and guarantees have been transferred or assigned to the Stadium Manager by separate agreement and Contractor agrees to enforce such warranties and guarantees, if necessary, on behalf of the Stadium Manager. In the event that Contractor fails to perform its obligations under this Section, or under any other warranty or guaranty under this Contract, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Stadium Manager, the Stadium Manager shall have the right to correct and replace any defective or non-conforming Work and any work damaged by such work or the replacement or correction thereof at Contractor’s sole expense. Contractor shall be obligated to fully reimburse the Stadium Manager for any expenses incurred hereunder upon demand.

3.16 Employee/Labor Certifications.

3.16.1 Contractor’s Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Contractor certifies that he is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker’s Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work. A certification form for this purpose, which is attached to this Contract as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by reference, shall be executed simultaneously with this Contract.

3.16.2 Equal Opportunity Employment. Contractor represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination.

Contract #: XXXXX
20 3.16.3 Verification of Employment Eligibility . By executing this Contract, Contractor verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time, and shall require all subcontractors and sub-subcontractors to comply with the same.

3.17 General Provisions.

3.17.1 Stadium Manager’s Representative. The Stadium Manager hereby designates the General Manager , or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Contract (“Stadium Manager’s Representative” ). Stadium Manager ’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the Stadium Manager for all purposes under this Contract. Contractor shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the Stadium Manager’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.17.2 Contractor’s Representative. Before starting the Work, Contractor shall submit in writing the name, qualifications and experience of its proposed representative who shall be subject to the review and approval of the Stadium Manager (“′Contractor’s Representative”).

Following approval by the Stadium Manager, Contractor’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of Contractor for all purposes under this Contract. Contractor’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Work, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all construction means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Work under this Contract. Contractor’s Representative shall devote full time to the Project and either he or his designee, who shall be acceptable to the Stadium Manager, shall be present at the Work site at all times that any Work is in progress and at any time that any employee or subcontractor of Contractor is present at the Work site. Arrangements for responsible supervision, acceptable to the Stadium Manager, shall be made for emergency Work which may be required. Should Contractor desire to change its Contractor’s Representative, Contractor shall provide the information specified above and obtain the Stadium Manager’s written approval.

3.17.3 Termination. This Contract may be terminated by Stadium Manager at any time, either with our without cause, by giving Contractor three (3) days advance written notice. In the event of termination by Stadium Manager for any reason other than the fault of Contractor, Stadium Manager shall pay Contractor for all Work performed up to that time as provided herein.

In the event of breach of the Contract by Contractor, Stadium Manager may terminate the Contract immediately without notice, may reduce payment to Contractor in the amount necessary to offset Stadium Manager’s resulting damages, and may pursue any other available recourse against Contractor. Contractor may not terminate this Contract except for cause. In the event this Contract is terminated in whole or in part as provided, Stadium Manager may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

Further, if this Contract is terminated as provided, Stadium Manager may require Contractor to provide all finished or unfinished documents, data, diagrams, drawings, materials or other matter prepared or built by Contractor in connection with its performance of this Contract.

3.17.4 Contract Interpretation. Should any question arise regarding the meaning or import of any of the provisions of this Contract or written or oral instructions from Stadium Manager, the matter shall be referred to Stadium Manager’s Representative, whose decision shall be binding upon Contractor.

Contract #: XXXXX
21 3.17.5 Anti-Trust Claims . This provision shall be operative if this Contract is applicable to California Public Contract Code Section 7103.5. In entering into this Contract to supply goods, services or materials, Contractor hereby offers and agrees to assign to the Stadium Manager all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Section 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, commencing with Section 16700, of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code) arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the Contract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the Stadium Manager tender final payment to Contractor, without further acknowledgment by the Parties.

3.17.6 Notices. All notices hereunder and communications regarding interpretation of the terms of the Contract or changes thereto shall be provided by the mailing thereof by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed as follows:

CONTRACTOR:

R. Brothers Painting, Inc.
707 W. Hedding Street
San Jose, CA 95110
Attn: Rod Rodriguez, President
Valentin Rosas, Estimator

S
TADIUM MANAGER:

Forty Niners Stadium Management Company LLC
4900 Marie DeBartolo Way
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Attn: Ryan Van Maarth, VP of Stadium Operations & Strategic Planning

With copy to:

Legal Affairs
Forty Niners Stadium Management Company LLC
4949 Marie P. DeBartolo Way
Santa Clara, CA 95054

Any notice so given shall be considered received by the other Party three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. Mail as stated above and addressed to the Party at the above address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.17.7 Time of Essence . Time is of the essence in the performance of this Contract.

3.17.8 Assignment Forbidden. Contractor shall not, either voluntarily or by action of law, assign or transfer this Contract or any obligation, right, title or interest assumed by Contractor herein without the prior written consent of Stadium Manager. If Contractor attempts an assignment or transfer of this Contract or any obligation, right, title or interest herein, Stadium Contract #: XXXXX
22 Manager may, at its option, terminate and revoke the Contract and shall thereupon be relieved from any and all obligations to Contractor or its assignee or transferee.

3.17.9 No Third Party Beneficiaries . There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.17.10 Laws, Venue, and Attorneys’ Fees . This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a s tate or federal court situated in the County of Santa Clara, State of California.

3.17.11 Counterparts. This Contract may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.17.12 Successors . The Parties do for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns agree to the full performance of all of the provisions contained in this Contract.

3.17.13 Levi’s Stadium Jobsite Rules. Contractor and its subcontractors of every tier and their officers, employees, workers, consultants, volunteers, agents shall comply with the Levi’s Stadium Jobsite Rules attached hereto as Exhibit “H” and incorporated herein by this reference. Failure to comply with the Levi’s Stadium Jobsite Rules may lead to dismissal of any violating parties from the Project site. Contractor shall be solely responsible for any time and cost impacts arising out of any failure to comply with the Levi’s Stadium Jobsite Rules.

3.17.14 Solicitation. Contractor maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Contract. Further, Contractor warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, Stadium Manager shall have the right to terminate this Contract without liability.

3.17.15 Conflict of Interest. Contractor maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Contractor warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, Stadium Manager shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability.

For the term of this Contract, no official, officer or employee of Stadium Manager, during the term of his or her service with Stadium Manager, shall have any direct interest in this Contract, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. In addition, Contractor agrees to file, or to cause its employees or subcontractors to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the Stadium Manager’s Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Work.

3.17.16 Certification of License.

3.17.16.1 Contractor certifies that as of the date of execution of this Contract, Contractor has a current contractor’s license of the classification indicated below under Contractor’s signature.

Contract #: XXXXX
23 3.17.16.2 Contractors are required by law to be licensed and regulated by the Contractors’ State License Board which has jurisdiction to investigate complaints against contractors if a complaint regarding a patent act or omission is filed within four (4) years of the date of the alleged violation. A complaint regarding a latent act or omission pertaining to structural defects must be filed within ten (10) years of the date of the alleged violation. Any questions concerning a contractor may be referred to the Registrar, Contractors’ State License Board, P.O.

Box 26000, Sacramento, California 95826.

3.17.17 Authority to Enter Contract . Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Contract have the legal power, right and authority to make this Contract and bind each respective Party.

3.17.18 Entire Contract; Modification. This Contract contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Contract may only be modified by a writing signed by both Parties.

3.17.19 Non-Waiver. None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be considered waived by either party, unless such waiver is specifically specified in writing.

3.17.20 Stadium Manager’s Right to Employ Other Contractors . Stadium Manager reserves right to employ other contractors in connection with this Project or other projects.

[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]

Contract #: XXXXX
24 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT

BETWEEN THE FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC AND R. BROTHERS PAINTING, INC.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Agreement as of the [***INSERT DAY***] day of [***INSERT MONTH***], [***INSERT YEAR***].

FORTY NINERS STADIUM R. BROTHERS PAINTING, INC.

MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC

By: By:

Jim Mercurio
EVP & General Manager Its:

Printed Name:

Rust Protection Mitigation 25
Bent Steel at Stadium Perimeter – Level 300
EXHIBIT “A”

SERVICES / SCHEDULE

PURPOSE:

This Project requires preparing and painting existing steel structure along the 300 level concourse of Levi’s Stadium. Rust stains are beginning to show on the existing steel at this location. This Project will apply paint to improve the aesthetic appearance and extend the useful life of the facility.

GENERAL:

1. All work shall be performed in accordance with the Contract Documents including, without limitation, the Sherwin-Williams specifications as provided in Exhibit “A-2”.

BASE BID SCOPE:

1. Contractor shall prepare, prime, apply sealant and apply two finish coats to the bent steel between Column Line 96 and Column Line 5 (approximately 288 l.f.) as shown in Exhibit “A-1”.

2. Preparation / Pre-Primer Coat: Contractor shall prepare steel for painting in accordance with SSPC 2 (hand tool) or SSPC 3 (power tool cleaning) standards to remove the existing coating of loose rust and mill scale from the steel in accordance with manufacturer recommendations.

3. Pre-Primer Coat: Contractor shall apply one coat of VpCI CorrVerter as recommended in the attached manufacturer specifications.

4. Primer: Contractor shall apply one primer coat of MAC 5000 WHT.

5. Sealant: Contractor shall apply a bead of Polyurethane (Loxon Sl, SL1 Self-Leveling sealant) to the concrete and metal railing support to divert away water from the metal prior to applying finish coat.

6. Finish: Contractor shall apply two finish coats of Sher-Cryl HPA High Performance Acrylic Semi- Gloss Coating Ultradeep/Clear Tint Base of the custom manual match titled “49ERS WHITE”.

ADDITIVE ALTERNATE BID ITEM NO. 1 SCOPE:

1. Additive Alternate No. 1 involves adding I-beam surfaces as shown in Exhibit “A-1” between Column Line 96 and Column Line 5 to the Project scope. Contractor shall prepare, prime, apply sealant and apply two finish coats to the additional I-beam surfaces as shown in Exhibit “A-1”.

2. Preparation / Pre-Primer Coat: Contractor shall prepare steel for painting in accordance with SSPC 2 (hand tool) or SSPC 3 (power tool cleaning) standards to remove the existing coating of loose rust and mill scale from the steel in accordance with manufacturer recommendations.

3. Pre-Primer Coat: Contractor shall apply one coat of VpCI CorrVerter as recommended in the attached manufacturer specifications.

4. Primer: Contractor shall apply one primer coat of MAC 5000 WHT.

5. Sealant: Contractor shall apply a bead of Polyurethane (Loxon Sl, SL1 Self-Leveling sealant) to the concrete and metal railing support to divert away water from the metal prior to applying finish coat.

6. Finish: Contractor shall apply two finish coats of Sher-Cryl HPA High Performance Acrylic Semi- Gloss Coating Ultradeep/Clear Tint Base of the custom manual match titled “49ERS WHITE”.

Rust Protection Mitigation 26
Bent Steel at Stadium Perimeter – Level 300
ADJUSTMENT OF BID QUANTITIES:

Stadium Manager reserves the right to increase or delete actual quantities of work by up to 25% of the estimated quantities reflected in the bid schedules (base bid and alternate) without any change to the unit price costs bid and without liability of any kind at its sole discretion. Any additional work shall be of the same character as the work specified herein and will be located adjacent to or near the location of the work specified herein.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:

1. Contractor shall provide protection for all existing building components beneath and around the work. Any damage to existing building components caused by contractor shall be immediately repaired or replaced at contractor’s sole expense in a manner acceptable to and approved by Stadium Manager.

2. In all active work areas, contractor shall provide, install and maintain all necessary barricades and warnings to prohibit pedestrian access into any affected work area. This not only includes areas surrounding the work, but also includes areas below the work. Levi’s Stadium is an active building containing employees, guests, and other contractors on a daily basis. Contractor shall be responsible for keeping others out of its active work areas and preventing the exposure of others to grinding, sanding, scraping, paint drips, overspray or any other material generated within the work area, both around and below.

3. Cleaning and Protection
a. At end of each workday, remove rubbish, empty cans, rags, and other discarded materials from Project site. Secure, locate and position all unused materials and equipment, including man lifts, to the satisfaction of Stadium Manager.
b. After completing coating application, clean spattered surfaces. Remove spattered coatings by washing, scraping, or other methods. Do not scratch or damage adjacent finished or unfinished surfaces. Do not allow coatings to drip, spatter onto or otherwise stain adjacent surfaces.
c. Protect work of other trades against damage from coating operation. Correct damage by cleaning, repairing, replacing, and recoating, as approved by Stadium Manager, and leave in an undamaged condition.
d. Protect all adjacent surfaces as required by field conditions.

MATERIALS:

1. Pre-primer coat shall be Sherwin-Williams 100501824 – CORRVERTER.

2. Primer shall be Sherwin-Williams I58W00020 – MAC 5000 WHT 1G.

3. Polyurethane Sealant shall be Sherwin Williams LX41L4143 – LOXON 1SL White 28.

4. Finish shall be Sherwin-Williams B66T00354 – Sher-Cryl HPA High Performance Acrylic Semi- Gloss Coating Ultradeep/Clear Tint Base.

INSTALLATION:

1. The Contractor is responsible for preparing all surfaces and supplying and applying all material required per the manufacturer requirements. Contractor shall provide all tools, labor, materials, and accessories necessary to complete the work per the manufacturer requirements.

2. The Project site is Levi’s Stadium, which is located at the following address:

Rust Protection Mitigation 27
Bent Steel at Stadium Perimeter – Level 300
Levi’s Stadium
4900 Marie P. DeBartolo Way
Santa Clara, CA 95054
SCHEDULE:

Performance of the Project is required within the Contract Time specified in the Contract Documents.

Contractor shall coordinate with Stadium Manager to schedule delivery, site access, and performance of the work.

Rust Protection Mitigation 28
Bent Steel at Stadium Perimeter – Level 300
EXHIBIT “A-1”
Work Location

96 98
100

1 3
5 BUILDING LINE

Rust Protection Mitigation 29
Bent Steel at Stadium Perimeter – Level 300

LOCATION OF AREA TO BE PREPARED AND

PAINTED PER THE ATTACHED SPECIFICATIONS
SEE DETAIL 1
0-- -
0--------
©--------
~-~~~~- ~

Rust Protection Mitigation 30
Bent Steel at Stadium Perimeter – Level 300

DETAIL 1:

LOCATIONS OF AREA TO BE PREPARED AND PAINTED PER THE ATTACHED SPECIFICATIONS. BASE BID WORK IN RED, ADD ALTERNATE WORK IN GREEN.

MANUFACTURER

1"

095423.A1

BASE BID PAINT WORK

ADD ALTERNATE WORK

SEALANT LOCATION
(BASE BID) 300 LEVEL MAIN
~ONCOURSE
U 47'-0"
ATIA.CHMBNT10
BF.AMABOVE
c::==:::J
IJNEARMBTALCBILlNG
12 GA HANGER WIRE

SPACBDAS REQUIRED BY
300C CARRIER SPACED AS

REQUIRED BY

MANUFACTUBR

UNDERSIDE OF

FLOOR ASSEMBLY
$
300CPANEL
~
---~

Rust Protection Mitigation 31
Bent Steel at Stadium Perimeter – Level 300
EXHIBIT “A-2”

PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS

4. FORTY NINER STADIUM

MANAGEMENT
Presented By:

Michael Barden
Sales Representative
408 460 7697
[email protected]

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS
1717 EL CAMINO REAL
SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 4160
(408) 244-2352

June 15, 2021
~ SHERWIN-WILLIAMS .

P.!

FORTY NINER STADIUM MANAGEMENT

LEVI STADIUM BENT STEEL
June 15, 2021

Rust Protection Mitigation 32
Bent Steel at Stadium Perimeter – Level 300

Product Submittal

Project:

Customer:

LEVI STADIUM BENT STEEL
4900 Marie P De Bartolo Way, SANTA CLARA , CA, 95054

FORTY NINER STADIUM MANAGEMENT
4900 MARIE P DEBARTOLO WAY, SANTA CLARA, CA,
950541155
LEVI

STADIUM

.1. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS .
fP.

1.. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS .
~

FORTY NINER STADIUM MANAGEMENT

LEVI STADIUM BENT STEEL
June 15, 2021

Rust Protection Mitigation 33
Bent Steel at Stadium Perimeter – Level 300

Dear Chuck Robinette:

On Monday, June 14, 2021 You and I performed a site inspection of the Levi's Stadium.

The primary purpose of my site visit was to (1) observe and document deficiencies of the metal s railing, concrete walkway.(2) provide a recommendation on how to properly prepare the metal to prevent further corrosion.

Based on my visual examination, the metal showed reddish-brown stains on the painted surface caused by rust and oxidation. When steel meets air and moisture, often it will look like this.

Fortunately, if there is an interruption in the oxidation process, the entire process stops.

One way to create such an interruption is to create a barrier coat that does not allow air and/or moisture to contact the steel.

This can be achieved by properly preparing the metal in accordance with SSPC 2 (hand tool) or SSPC 3 (power tool cleaning) standards to remove the existing coating of loose rust and mill scale from the steel and then apply a coat of VpCI CorrVerter.

This is a water-based rust converter and primer recommended for application to rusty or poorly prepared steel surfaces where further corrosion protection is required and good surface preparation is difficult to achieve. VpCI CorrVerter is formulated to penetrate rust, eliminate further rust, penetrate to the bare metal, and stop further rusting.

A wet film thickness of 3.0-5.0 mils (75-125 microns) is suggested to achieve a proper dry film thickness and to convert all the corrosion present on the surface. It is recommended that film thickness is monitored in critical areas to make certain a minimum of 2 mils (50 microns) dry film thickness is obtained.

Since the objective to prevent future corrosion, my recommendation would be to apply a bead of Polyurethane (Loxon SL or SL1 Self-Leveling sealant) to the concrete and metal railing support to divert away water from the metal before apply finish coat.The product may be top coated within 24 hours using a coat.

Should you require assistance or have any questions or concerns, please contact me at or e-mail me.

Thanks,
Mike
Michael Barden
Sales Representative
408 460 7697
[email protected]

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS
1717 EL CAMINO REAL,
SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 4160

.1. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS .
fP.

FORTY NINER STADIUM MANAGEMENT

LEVI STADIUM BENT STEEL
June 15, 2021

Rust Protection Mitigation 34
Bent Steel at Stadium Perimeter – Level 300

Exterior Finishes
Steel/Ferrous Metal
Pre primer coat : 100501824 - CORRVERTER
Notes: This is a water-based rust converter and primer recommended for application to rusty or poorly prepared steel surfaces where further corrosion protection is required and good surface preparation is difficult to achieve. VpCI CorrVerter is formulated to penetrate rust A wet film thickness of 3.0-5.0 mils (75- 125 microns) is suggested to achieve a proper dry film thickness Primer: I58W00020 - MAC 5000 WHT 1G
Notes: Notes: A wet film thickness of 3.0-5.0 mils (75-125 microns) is suggested to achieve a proper dry film thickness
after primer and before finish : LX41L4143 - LOXON 1SL WHITE 28 Notes: my recommendation would be to apply a bead of Polyurethane (Loxon SL or SL1 Self-Leveling sealant) to the concrete and metal railing support to divert away water from the metal before apply finish coat.The product may be top coated within 24 hours using a coat
Finish: B66T00354 - Sher-Cryl HPA High Performance Acrylic Semi-Gloss Coating Ultradeep/Clear Tint Base
Notes: A wet film thickness of 3.0-5.0 mils (75-125 microns) is suggested to achieve a proper dry film thickness apply 2 coats
.1. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS .
rPi

Rust Protection Mitigation 35
Bent Steel at Stadium Perimeter – Level 300

Basic Surface Preparation
Coating performance is directly affected by surface preparation. Coating integrity and service life will be reduced because of The majority of paintable surfaces are concrete, ferrous metal, galvanizing, wood and aluminum. They all require protection to keep them from deteriorating in aggressive environments. Selection of the proper method for surface preparation depends on the substrate, the environment, the coating selected, and the expected service life of the coating system. Economics, surface contamination, and the effect on the substrate will also influence the selection of surface preparation methods. Recognize that any surface preparation short of total removal of the old coating may compromise the service length of the system.

Verify the existence of lead based paints on the project. Buildings constructed after 1978 are less likely to contain lead based paints. If lead based paints are suspected on the project, all removal must be done in accordance with the EPA Renovation, Repair and Painting and all applicable state and local regulations. State and local regulations may be more strict than those set under the federal regulations. Verify that Owner has completed a Hazardous Material Assessment Report for the project prior to issuing of Drawings.

Concluding that no lead based paints were found on project site, delete paragraph regarding lead based paints.

WARNING! Removal of old paint by sanding, scraping or other means may generate dust or fumes that contain lead. Exposure to lead dust or fumes may cause brain damage or other adverse health effects, especially in children or pregnant women.

Controlling exposure to lead or other hazardous substances requires the use of proper protective equipment, such as a properly fitted respirator (NIOSH approved) and proper containment and cleanup. For more information, call the National Lead Information Center at 1- 800-424-LEAD (in US) or contact your local health authority. Removal must be done in accordance with EPA Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule and all related state and local regulations. Care should be taken to follow all state and local regulations which may be more strict than those set under the federal RRP Rule.

No exterior paint ing should be done immediately after a rain, during foggy weather, when rain is predicted, or when the temperature is below 50°F, unless the products to be used are designed to be used in those environments.

Galvanized Metal – S-W 10: Allow to weather a minimum of 6 months prior to coating. Clean per SSPC-SP1 using detergent and water or a degreasing cleaner, then prime as required. When weathering is not possible or the surface has been treated with chromates or silicates, first Solvent Clean per SSPC-SP1 and apply a test area, priming as required. Allow the coating to dry at least one week before testing. If adhesion is poor, Brush Blast per SSPC-SP16 is necessary to remove these treatments.

Steel/Ferrous Metal Substrates
SSPC-SP1- Solvent Cleaning: Solvent cleaning is a method for removing all visible oil, grease, soil, drawing and cutting compounds, and other soluble contaminants. Solvent cleaning does not remove rust or mill scale. Change rags and cleaning solution frequently so that deposits of oil and grease are not spread over additional areas in the cleaning process. Be sure to allow adequate ventilation. Follow manufacturer's safety recommendations when using solvents. For complete instructions, refer to Steel Structures Paint Council Surface Preparation Specification No.1. (Refer to each products cleaning instructions. Many acrylic coatings will state; When cleaning the surface per SSPC-SP1, use only an emulsifying industrial detergent, followed by a water rinse. Do not use hydrocarbon solvents for cleaning.) SSPC-SP2 - Hand Tool Cleaning: Hand Tool Cleaning removes all loose mill scale, loose rust, and other detrimental foreign matter. It is not intended that adherent mill scale, rust, and paint be removed by this process. Mil scale, rust, and paint are considered adherent if they cannot be removed by lifting with a dull putty knife. Before hand tool cleaning, remove visible oil, grease, soluble welding residues, and salts by the methods outlined in SSPC-SP1. For complete instructions, refer to Steel Structures Paint Council Surface Preparation Specification No.2.

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS .

Rust Protection Mitigation 36
Bent Steel at Stadium Perimeter – Level 300
SSPC-SP3 - Power Tool Cleaning: Power Tool Cleaning removes all loose mill scale, loose rust, and other detrimental foreign matter. It is not intended that adherent mill scale, rust, and paint be removed by this process. Mil scale, rust, and paint are considered adherent if they cannot be removed by lifting with a dull putty knife. Before power tool cleaning, remove visible oil, grease, soluble welding residues, and salts by the methods outlined in SSPC-SP1. For complete instructions, refer to Steel Structures Paint Council Surface Preparation Specification No.3.

SSPC-SP5 / NACE 1 - White Metal Blast Cleaning: A White Metal Blast Cleaned surface, when viewed without magnification, shall be free of all visible oil, grease, dirt, dust, mill scale, rust, paint, oxides, corrosion products, and other foreign matter. Before blast cleaning, visible deposits of oil or grease shall be removed by any of the methods specified in SSPC-SP 1 or other agreed upon methods. For complete instructions, refer to Joint Surface Preparation Standard SSPC-SP5/ NACE No.1.

SSPC-SP6 / NACE 3 - Commercial Blast Cleaning: A Commercial Blast Cleaned surface, when viewed without magnification, shall be free of all visible oil, grease, dirt, dust, mill scale, rust, paint, oxides, corrosion products, and other foreign matter, except for staining. Staining shall be limited to no more than 33 percent of each square inch of surface area and may consist of light shadows, slight streaks, or minor discoloration caused by stains of rust, stains of mill scale, or stains of previously applied paint. Before blast cleaning, visible deposits of oil or grease shall be removed by any of the methods specified in SSPC-SP 1 or other agreed upon methods. For complete instructions, refer to Joint Surface Preparation Standard SSPC- SP6/NACE No.3.

SSPC-SP7 / NACE 4 - Brush-Off Blast Cleaning: A Brush-Off Blast Cleaned surface, when viewed without magnification, shall be free of all visible oil, grease, dirt, dust, loose mill scale, loose rust, and loose paint. Tightly adherent mill scale, rust, and paint may remain on the surface. Mil scale, rust, and coating are considered adherent if they cannot be removed by lifting with a dull putty knife. Before blast cleaning, visible deposits of oil or grease shall be removed by any of the methods specified in SSPC-SP 1 or other agreed upon methods.

← All documents from this meeting