Agenda packet — City Council and Authorities Concurrent, January 25, 2022 (part 6 of 6)

inches i n height (at top of parapet) and contain approximately 88,087 square feet of floor area, resulting in a proposed FAR of 3.48:1.

The Project is designated for ‘Community Mixed Use’ uses (Attachment A), and would be consistent with the general use, designation, density, and building intensity outlined in both Plan Bay Area 2040 and Plan Bay Area 2050.4 It should be noted that the statutory requirement is that a project achieves general rather than absolute or perfect consistency with both the Plan Bay Area 2040 and Plan Bay Area 2050 use designation, density, and building intensity projections.

Plan Bay Area 2040

For the Plan Bay Area 2040, ABAG produced a limited an d focused update that builds upon the growth patterns and strategies developed in the original Plan Bay Area but with updated planning and growth assumptions that incorporate key economic, demographic, and financial trends from the last four years . Specifically, ABAG’s Supplemental Statutorily Required Maps Appendix , identifies Transit Priority Areas (TPAs) in the region where growth is forecasted to occur due to proximity to existing and planned transit, existing job centers, existing and planned infrastructure to support more walkability and use of alternative transportation modes, and in areas identified for jurisdictional expansion (i.e., spheres of influence). As shown in Attached A, Figure 4a, Forecast Development 2040, the Project Site is located within a TPA as identified by Plan Bay Area 2040 . The map also identifies Priority Development Areas (PDAs), which are existing neighborhoods served by public transit and have been identified as appropriate for additional, compact development. Collectively, these TPAs and PDAs are anticipated to contain the majority of the existing and expected growth within the region.

As shown in Figure 4a, the Project Site is adjacent to a PDA. Therefore, the Project and the Project Site are consistent with ABAG’s forecasted development pattern for the region, including the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the area.

Plan Bay Area 2050

For Plan Bay Area 2050, Plan Bay Area 2050 connects the elements of housing, the economy, transportation, and the environment through 35 strategies that will make the Bay Area more equitable for all residents and more resilient in the face of unexpected challenges. In the short-term, the

4 On October 21, 2021, the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) approved the Plan Bay Area 2050.

However, pursuant to CARB Executive Orders G-16-066 and G-20-239; the 2050 Plan Bay Area would need to be approved by California Air Resources Board (CARB) to determine that the Plan would achieve 2020 and 2035 GHG reductions targets. Therefore, this analysis discusses both the Plan Bay Area 2040 and the Draft Plan Bay Area 2050. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) jointly adopted Plan Bay Area on July 26, 2017 (MTC Resolution No. 4300 and ABAG Resolution No. 10- 17).

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 7 ends

plan’s Implementation Plan identifies more than 80 specific actions for MTC, ABAG, and partner organizations to take over the next five years to make headway on each of the 35 strategies. Specifically, Plan Bay Area 2050 created a spatial framework to carry out strategies and evaluate the outcomes of such strategies. The Growth Geographies are places identified for housing and/or job growth either by loc al jurisdictions or because of their proximity to transit or access to opportunity. For modeling purposes, a series of specific Growth Geographies were established to further define the overall definition of Growth Geographies (GG) adopted by the Commission and Executive Board in September 2020 (mapped in Figure 13 of the Plan Bay Area 2050 [Map 1-1] Forecasting and Modeling Supplemental Report). Specifically, the Plan Bay Area 2050, Forecasting and Modeling Report, identifies Growth Geography (GG) that are areas including locally designated PDAs and Priority Production Areas (PPAs), as well as Transit-Rich Areas (TRAs) served by BART or Caltrain Baby Bullet routes. In cities that have nominated less than 50 percent of the land within their boundaries eligible for designation as a PDA, these areas also include: all TRAs not included in a PDA including both High - Resource Areas (HRAs) and places outside HRAs; and HRAs that are outside of a TRA but within ¼ mile of a bus stop with 16 - to 30-minute peak period headways. As shown in Attachment A, Figure 4b, Forecasted Development 2050, the Project Site falls within a TRA/HRA under the Plan Bay Area 2050. Therefore, the Project and the Project Site are consistent with ABAG’s forecasted development pattern for the region, including the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the area.

The Project is also consistent with the goals and policies in Plan Bay Area 2040 and Plan Bay Area 2050, as outlined in Attachment B. As such, the Project is consistent with this criterion.

PRC § 21155(b). To be considered a Transit Priority Project (TPP), as defined by § 21155(b), the project must meet all of the following criteria. A TPP shall:

Consistent?
Yes No
(1) Contain at least 50 percent residential use, based on total building square footage and, if the project contains between 26 percent and 50 percent nonresidential uses, a floor area ratio of not less than 0.75;
The Project would demolish the existing car wash and associated surface parking area on the Project Site. In its place, the Project would construct a 6-story apartment building with a total floor area of 88,087 square feet and 59 affordable housing units. Of the 88,087 square feet, 2,630 square feet is proposed for ground -floor commercial/office uses. Thus, 85,457 square feet, or approximately 97 percent of the Site is proposed for residential uses. In addition, t he onsite FAR would be 3.4 8:1, which greater than the required 0.75 FAR. As such, the Project is consistent with this criterion.

X
CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 8 ends

(2) Provide a minimum net density of at least 20 dwelling units per acre; and
The Project would develop the approximately 25,300 square feet (0.58- acre) Project Site with 59 residential units . Pursuant to Chapter 18. 22 (Regulations for Various Mixed Use Combining Zoning Districts) of the Santa Clara City Code, development located within the VHDMU zone, which the development will be utilizing under AB 3194 (2018), is permitted at a maximum density of 120 dwelling units per acre or 70 dwelling units on the 0.58-acre Project Site.

The Project is provid ing a total of 59 dwelling units on the 0.58-acre Project Site, or a total density of 101.7 dwelling units per acre . As such, the Project is consistent with this criterion.

X
(3) Be within one -half mile of a major transit stop or high -quality transit corridor included in a regional transportation plan. A major transit stop is as defined in PRC Section 21064.3, except that, for purposes of this section, it also includes major transit stops that are included in the applicable regional transportation plan. For purposes of this section, a high quality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. A project shall be considered to be within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high- quality transit corridor if all parcels within the project have no more than 25 percent of their area farther than one-half mile from the stop or corridor and if not more than 10 percent of the residential units or 100 units, whichever is less, in the project are farther than one half mile from the stop or corridor.

The applicable regional transportation plan is the ABAG Plan Bay Area 2040. PRC Section 21064.3 defines a major transit stop as a site containing any of the following: (a) An existing rail or bus rapid transit station; (b) A ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service ; or (c) The intersection of two or more major bus routes with a f requency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. ABAG defines peak hours as between 6 AM and 9 AM and between 3 PM and 6 PM.5 As described below, the Project Site is located within one-half mile of an existing major transit stop.

Major Transit Stop
The entirety of the Project Site is located within approximately 200 feet west of the existing Stevens Creek Boulevard/Saratoga Avenue VTA Bus Stop No. 60583, near the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Saratoga Avenue and served by VTA Bus Line Route 23.

VTA Route 23 runs between De Anza College in Cupertino and Alum Rock Station in San Jose via Stevens Creek Boulevard. Landmark stops X

5 Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2013. Plan Bay Area 2040 – Glossary. Adopted 2017, accessed September 23, 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 9 ends

include Cupertino High School, Santana Row, Westfield Valley Fair, San Jose Convention Center, San Jose City Hall, San Jose State University, and the Mexican Heritage Plaza.6 The VTA Route 23 rims along Stevens Creek Boulevard with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.7

Additionally, other regular bus routes in the area include VTA Rapid Bus Line 523, and Local Bus 61.

High-Quality Transit Corridor
As described above, the Project Site is located on Stevens Creek Boulevard, near the Stevens Creek Boulevard/Saratoga Avenue bus stop and the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Saratoga Avenue .

This portion of Steven’s Creek Boulevard has been designated as a High- Quality Transit Corridor and within a TPA by ABAG/MTC Plan Bay Area 2040 and Plan Bay Area 2050 . Furthermore, the Project Site is located within the Stevens Creek Boulevard Focus area, which is an area that reflect higher densities, mixed -uses, and a higher proportion of housing and employment growth in urban areas, p articularly near transit stations and along transit corridors as well as in town centers.8

The Project Site is therefore located within one-half mile of a high-quality transit corridor. As such, the Project is consistent with this criterion.

PRC § 21155.1(a). The TPP complies with all of the following environmental criteria:

Consistent?
Yes No
(1) The TPP and other projects approved prior to the approval of the TPP but not yet built can be adequately served by existing utilities, and the TPP applicant has paid, or has committed to pay, all applicable in-lieu or development fees.

A considerable increase in demand for services or utilities would not b e anticipated with the implementation of the Project since it is located in an existing heavily urbanized location served by existing public utilities and services. The Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) provides water and sewer service, Silicon Valley Power (SVP) provides electric service, and the City of Santa Clara provides solid waste collection to the Project Site. Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) provides natural gas services to the City and w ould be expected to serve the Project Site. AT&T and Comcast would be the cable television, telephone, and fiber providers for the Project Site.

In compliance with locally administered laws and ordinances, the X

6 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). 2019. Route 23 Map. Effective December 28, 2019, accessed https://www.vta.org/sites/default/files/images/2019-12/23_combined.jpg. 7 Ibid.
8 Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2013. Plan Bay Area 2040 – Glossary. Adopted 2013, accessed September 23, 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 10 ends

California Department of Real Estate has approved a Master Geographic Letter (MGL) (Attachment C1) for the City of Santa Clara. The MGL allows cities and counties to avoid the need for individual clearance letters in connection with subdivision map requests. Conditions for approval listed in the MGL include utility service, including sanitary sewers, domestic water systems, storm sewers and ditches, and electric utilities. Based on this letter, there is sufficient capacity to provide water and sewer service to the Project Site (Attachment C1).

In addition, SCVWD’s Water Supply Master Plan 2040 , which accounts for existing development within the water service area as well as projected growth through the year 2040, concludes that SCVWD would meet all new domestic demand for water due to projected popula tion growth through the year 2040 with implementation of all anticipated water supply projects.9 Furthermore, the Project and other proposed projects would be required to comply with numerous water conservation regulations contained in the Santa Clara City Code (SCCC) and with the California Green Building Standards Code, which contain standards designed for efficient water use. Specifically, the Project, with inclusion of the required water conservation features, will use approximately 85.3 gallons per day (gpd) per unit (Attachment D2). As calculated in the CEQA SCPE Energy & Water Efficiency Compliance Memorandum, the average per unit water uses for the City of Santa Clara from 2019-2020 was 150.6 gallons per household per day. Therefore, the per household water usage for the Project would be approximately 38.6 percent less than the average household.10
SCVWD’s review considers the Project demands on the infrastructure in conjunction with existing conditions and forecasted growth. In addition, the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan addresses the facility needs of the City’s wastewater program, recycled water, and urban runoff/stormwater management through the year 2045.

As it relates to wastewater, the 2020 Urban Waste Management Plan guides the City and SCVWD on implementing decisions that would include system improvements and expansions, as well as maintenance and reuse of wastewater within its collection and treatment facilities.

The 2020 Urban Water Management Plan concludes that based on the design capacities and the projected future flows of each water reclamation plant within the City through year 2045, all existing water reclamation plants would have sufficient capacity to manage projected wastewater flows. As such, the Project as well as other projects within the City could be served by the existing sewer infrastructure.11

9 SCVWD, 2019. Santa Clara Valley Water District Water Supply Master Plan 2040. Adopted November 2019, accessed October 19, 2021 at
https://www.valleywater.org/sites/default/files/Water%20Supply%20Master%20Plan%202040_11.01.2019_v2.pdf. 10 Based on household size of 2.51 persons per household, and City of Santa Clara 2020 Urban Water Management Plan R-GPCD Gallons Per Capita Per Day of 60 x 2.51 occupants per multi-family; the average water usage is 150.6 gallons per day per household.
11 City of Santa Clara, 2021. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Adopted June 22, 2021, accessed October 19, 2021 at https://www.santaclaraca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/74073/637606452907100000.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 11 ends

Stormwater collection and infrastructure would be provided by the City of Santa Clara. In terms of stormwater runoff, the Project would actually be expected to decrease the amount of runoff that would flow to nearby storm drains due to inclusion of Low Impact Development (LID) best management practices (BMPs) to capture some of the stormwater. In addition, per City requirements, the Project would be required to comply with the City of Santa Clara Department of Public Works Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) Plan and the City’s LID Ordinance to treat stormwater for pollutants and control runoff at buildout. Therefore, the Project would not create or contribute runoff water whi ch would exceed the capacity of the existing or planned stormwater drainage system.

Silicon Valley Power (SVP) would provide electric service to the Project Site. Since the Project is located in an urbanized area with high -density uses, there would be no need for additional construction of electrical utilities or power lines. Furthermore, energy efficient measures proposed for the Project include high performance low -e windows, wood framed walls with R-21 batt insulation, wood framed roof with R-38 batt insulation, certified high-reflectance cool roof, central water heating system, reduced wattage from light -emitting diode (LED) lighting fixtures, and low -flow toilets, sinks, and plumbing fixtures (Attachment D2). SVP provided a will- serve letter on Octob er 8, 2021, that indicates that the company has sufficient infrastructure to support the Project (Attachment C4).

Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) would be the gas provider for the Project.

A gas meter shall be provided for the back of house and central domestic and space heating systems and located on the ground floor parking structure in a dedicated room as outlined by the gas company rules and regulations. Final determination of gas pressure will be applied for and approved by PG&E.

With regard to electrical service, SVP’s most recently adopted Integrated Resource Plan 12 identifies adequate resources (natural gas, coal) to support future generation capacity through 2030. Projections for energy efficiency improvements and economic growth which includes construction projects are also provided within the Integrated Resources Plan. Therefore, electricity usage resulting from the future operation of the Project is accounted for in SVP’s projections. Furthermore, the Project will be required to incorporate energy conservation features and comply with applicable regulations, including the California Green Building Standards (CALGreen) Code and State energy standards under Title 24, as necessary. As such, based on SVP’s 2018 Integrated Resource Plan, the Project can be served by the existing and planned electrical service.

With regard to natural gas, the 20 20 California Gas Report presents a comprehensive outlook for natural gas r equirements and supplies for California through the year 2035. 13 As stated therein, the California

12 SVP, 2018. 2018 Integrated Resource Plan. Adopted November 12, 2018. Accessed October 19, 2021 at https://www.siliconvalleypower.com/home/showpublisheddocument/62481/637268684502400000. 13 California Gas and Electric Utilities, 2020. 2020 California Gas Report. Available at:
https://www.socalgas.com/sites/default/files/2020-
10/2020_California_Gas_Report_Joint_Utility_Biennial_Comprehensive_Filing.pdf, accessed October 19, 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 12 ends

Energy and Electric Utilities, a collective of California’s utility companies, estimates natural gas supplies within PG&E’s planning area. As with SVP’s 2018 Integrated Resource Plan discussed above, the 20 20 California Gas Report considers changing economics and demographics and trends in growth in various market sectors to plan for future natural gas supplies and infrastructure. Therefore, natural gas usage r esulting from future operation of the Project as well as other nearby projects is accounted for in the PG&E projections. Furthermore, as specifically discussed in the 20 20 California Gas Report, PG&E projects total gas demand to decline from 20 20 to 2035 due to modest economic growth, the California Public Utilities Commission mandated energy efficiency standards and programs, tighter standards created by revised Title 24 Codes and Standards, renewable electricity goals, the decline in commercial and industrial demand, and conservation savings linked to Advanced Metering Infrastructure. Consistent with this forecast, pursuant to City and state requirements, the Project would incorporate energy conservation features and comply with applicable regul ations, including the CALGreen Code and State energy standards under Title 24 that would continue to reduce the use of natural gas. As such, based on the 20 20 California Gas Report, the Project could be served by the existing and planned natural gas service.

Regarding solid waste services, as required by City Ordinance No. 1947 (Accumulation, Transportation, and Disposal of Waste Matter ), Project construction waste would be hauled by permitted haulers and taken only to City-certified construction and demolition processing facilities that are monitored for compliance with recycling regulations. In addition, during operation the Project would include an on -site recycling area or room of specified size. The Project would also comply with State and local solid waste reduction and recycling regulations including AB 939, AB 341, AB 1826, and the City’s waste diversion goals.

In addition, the Project would be required to pay all applicable permit and development fees pursuant to code requirements and conditions of the Project. The applicable fees include but are not limited to the Santa Clara Unified School District fee in comp liance with Senate Bill 50 and parks and recreation fees pursuant to the Quimby Act. Thus, the Project meets this criterion.
(2) The site of the TPP does not contain wetlands or riparian areas, does not have significant value as a wildlife habitat, and implementation of the project would not harm protected species.

The Project is situated in an urban, fully developed mixed-use corridor, adjacent to a large boulevard, and nearby multiple employment centers.

The Project Site is currently developed with an existing one-story structure and associated surface parking.

Review of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s National Wetlands Inventory identified no protected wetlands in the vicinity of the Project Site X
CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 13 ends

and the Project Site is not located withi n a riparian area.14 The nearest body of water is the Saratoga Creek, approximately 1.25 miles northwest and downhill from the Project Site. Furthermore, as the Project Site is fully developed, there are no open spaces with water courses such as streams or lakes within or adjacent to the Project Site, and the Project Site and vicinity do not support any riparian or wetland habitat, a s defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, the Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on wetland s, riparian habitat, or other sensitive natural communities identified in federal, state, or local plans, policies, and regulations.

An unmaintained street planter fronts the Project Site along the southern and western boundary and contains ruderal/weedy species. Shrubs are located on the southwest corner of the Project Site and wrap around the site along a portion of the western boundary. Ornamental vines cover a stem wall located along the eastern property boundary. Ornamental trees and shrubs occur along the northern boundary of the Project Site and appear to provide visual screening between the site and a concrete block stem wall that forms the property boundary with the multifamily building to the north. Pursuant to Santa Clara City Code Chapter 18.88 (Landscape Permit Provisions), all trees and shrubs planned for removal would require a written permit from the superintendent of streets. As discussed in Attachment F, consistent with Plan Bay Area 2050 Mitigation Measures 2.9-1(a) through 2.10-5 included in Plan Bay Area 2040 Final Program EIR, the removal or pruning of trees would occur in accordance with the MBTA and state and local requirements. Thus, the Project would not harm any species protected by the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (1 6 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), the Native Plant Protection Act [Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code ], or the California Endangered Species Act [Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050 ) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code], and, therefore, meets this criterion.
(3) The site of the TPP site is not included on any list of facilities and sites compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

Government Code Section 65962.5 requires the compilation of a list of hazardous materials sites, commonly referred to as the “Cortese List.” Because the statute was enacted more than 20 years ago, some of its provisions refer to agency activities that were conducted many years ago and are no longer being implemented; in some cases, the information required to be compiled on the Cortese List does not exist. Those requesting a copy of the Cortese Lists are now re ferred directly to the appropriate information resources contained on internet websites hosted by the boards or departments referenced in the statute, including the X

14 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2021. National Wetlands Inventory, Wetlands Mapper. Available at:
www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html, accessed September 24, 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 14 ends

Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) online EnviroStor database and the State Water Resources Control Board’s online GeoTracker database.15 EnviroStor and Geotracker each provide access to detailed information on hazardous waste permitted sites and corrective action facilities, as well as existing site cleanup information. EnviroSt or and Geotracker also provide information on investigation, cleanup, permitting, and/or corrective actio ns that are permitted, planned, being conducted, or have been completed under DTSC’s and the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (RWQCB) respective oversight.

A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared on April 29, 2021 for the Project Site by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc.16 Information regarding the 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard parcel was acquired by reviewing the historical aerial photog raphs, Sanborn fire insurance maps, and field surveys. As part of the Phase I, local agencies were contacted to request any information related to hazardous materials on-, or in the immediate vicinity, of the Project Site. In addition, a Phase II ESA was prepared by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. in July 2021 to provide additional information.17
According to the Phase I, the Project Site is not listed in the Cortese list.

15 California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA). 2020. Background and History, Cortese List. Available at:
https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/Background/, accessed September 24, 2021. 16 Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. 2021. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report for 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard. Prepared April 29, 2021.
17 Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. 2021. Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report. For 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Santa Clara CA. Prepared July 9, 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 15 ends

could not rule out the potential for additional impact to the sub surface beneath the Project Site and, as such, the historical use is considered a REC. The Phase I recommended further subsurface investigation in order to determine the presence or absence of soil, soil vapor, and/or groundwater contamination due to the historical use of the site.

Given the recommendation of the Phase I, a Phase II was prepared for the Project Site by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc . on July 9, 2021.18 According to the Phase II, seven soil and soil gas borings were taking during the investigation and seven soil samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Impacts from benzene were identified throughout the Project Site above the residential ESL and in the eastern p ortion of the site above the commercial/industrial ESL. In addition, 1,2 -dibromethane and 1,4 -dichlorobenzene were identified in the southeast corner of the site and ethylbenzene was detected in the northeast corner of the Project Site. The Phase II recomm ended the decommissioning and removal of the clarifier in accordance with local regulatory standards and the installation of a vapor barrier as a part of new construction activities.

In addition to the Phase I and Phase II, a Preliminary Environmental Assessment (PEA) was completed for the Project Site in October 2021 (Attachment E3).19 The PEA reiterated the conclusion of the Phase II that the Project should include the removal of the existing clarifier on the property, as well as removal of soil in the su rrounding area with post - remediation confirmatory gas sampling and inclusion of a sub-slab vapor barrier system.

As a part of the Project, the Project Applicant will decommission and remove the existing clarifier onsite . During this process the soils surrounding the clarifier will be tested and removed as needed in accordance with local regulatory guidelines. In addition, a vapor barrier system will be installed to mitigate the potential for vapor intrusion. The vapor barrier would be designed to mitigate volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and follow up sampling would be required to evaluate the effectiveness of the mitigation efforts. Furthermore, the Project would incorporate passive design features (ground -level open po dium style parking on lower level, and no residences on lower level) that would also help to mitigate any potential vapor intrusion. Implementation of these Project components would be done in compliance with regulatory standards, including coordination with the Santa Clara Building Division.

While the Project Site is listed in the California HWTS, as discussed in the Phase I, it is not identified on the Cortese List and, therefore, is not on any list of hazardous waste sites pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and would not result in a significant hazard to the public or environment. (Attachment E1, E2, and E3).

18 Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. 2021. Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report prepared for 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Santa Clara, California 92117. Partner Project Number 21-316150.3. Prepared July 9, 2021. 19 ESA, 2021. Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) prepared for CRP Affordable Housing and Community Development. October 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 16 ends

(4) The site of the TPP is subject to a preliminary endangerment assessment prepared by a registered environmental assessor to determine the existence of any release of a hazardous substance on the site and to determine the potential for exposure of future occupants to significant health hazards from any nearby property or activity.
(a) If a release of a hazardous substance is found to exist on the site, the release shall be removed, or any significant effects of the release shall be mitigated to a level of insignificance in compliance with state and federal
requirements;
(b) If a potential f or exposure to significa nt hazards from surrounding properties or activities is found to exist, the effects of the potential exposure shall be mitigated to a level of insignificance in compliance with state and federal
requirements.

As previously stated, a Phase I ESA, Phase II ESA, and PEA, included within Attachment E, were prepared for the Project Site . Information regarding the 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard parcel was acquired by reviewing the historical aerial photographs , field surveys, database reviews, and previous soil vapor studies prepared for the Project Site .

Previous uses of the Project Site and nearby properties were evaluated to identify any historically recognized environmental conditions , to determine the existence of hazardous substance releases on the Project Site, and to determine the potential for exposure of future occupants to significant health hazards from any nearby property or activity. The findings of these reports are summarized below.20

Site Reconnaissance
3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Phase I ESA (2021)
A Phase I Environmental Site A ssessment (ESA) was prepared on April 29, 2021 for the Project Site by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. 21 Information regarding the 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard parcel was acquired by reviewing the historical aerial photog raphs, Sanborn fire insurance maps, and field surveys. As part of the Phase I, local agencies were contacted to request any information related to hazardous materials on-, or in the immediate vicinity, of the Project Site. In addition, a Phase II ESA was prepared by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. in July 2021 to provide additional information.22
X

20 Note that the Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption (specifically, Public Resources Code Section 21151.1(a)(4)) does not contemplate or require the preparation of a preliminary endangerment assessment pursuant to the requirements of Health & Safety Code Chapter 6.8, which is a distinct and unrelated statutory regime. This fact has been confirmed by the DTSC, which has noted that Public Resources Code Section 21151.1 does not envision any role or mandate any regulatory oversight by DTSC. 21 Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. 2021. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report for 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard. Prepared April 29, 2021.
22 Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. 2021. Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report. For 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Santa Clara CA. Prepared July 9, 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 17 ends

According to the Phase I, the Project Site is not listed in the Cortese list.

The Project Site is listed in the California Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS), as a site that was permitted to operate as a generator of hazardous waste from approximately 1998 to 2007; however, no reportable quantity of waste was available, and no releases or violations are indicated. The Phase I concluded that based on the lack of listing in other databases indicating violations and/or a release, this listing is not expected to represent a significant environm ental concern. The Phase I identified one recognized environmental condition (REC) on the Project Site, which was due to the nature of the site’s previous auto -related operations, which may have included the use, storage, handling, and/or generation of hazardous materials and/or waste onsite. To determine the presence of such materials, shallow soil vapor sampling was completed at the Project Site on March 22, 2017. Results of the soil vapor sampling concluded that all soil vapor samples collected on the Pr oject Site contained detectable concentration of dichlorodifluoromethane, freon 113, tetrachloroethene, toluene, 1,1,1 -trichloroethane, 1,2,4 - trimethylbenzene, and/or total xylenes, above the laboratory reporting limits; however, the detected concentration of analytes was reportedly well below the applicable residential and commercial/industrial land use environmental screening levels (ESLs). In addition, the survey determined the presence of a clarifier/separator, approximately 12 feet below ground surface . Due to the duration of auto related operations onsite, including seven -stage, below -grade clarifier, known detections, and limited information from previous environmental reports, the Phase I could not rule out the potential for additional impact to the subsurface beneath the Project Site and, as such, the historical use is considered a REC. The Phase I recommended further subsurface investigation in order to determine the presence or absence of soil, soil vapor, and/or groundwater contamination due to the historical use of the site. 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report (2021)
Given the recommendation of the Phase I, a Phase II was prepared for the Project Site by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. on July 9, 2021.23 According to the Phase II, seven soil and soil gas borings were taking during the investigation and seven soil samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Impacts from benzene were identified throughout the Project Site above the residential ESL and in the eastern portion of the site above the commercial/industrial ESL. In addition, 1,2 -dibromethane and 1,4 -dichlorobenzene were identified in the southeast corner of the site and ethylbenzene was detected in the northeast corner of the Proje ct Site. The Phase II recommended the decommissioning and removal of the clarifier in accordance with local regulatory standards and the installation of a vapor barrier as a part of new construction activities.

Preliminary Endangerment Assessment for 3941 Stevens Creek

23 Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. 2021. Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report prepared for 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Santa Clara, California 92117. Partner Project Number 21-316150.3. Prepared July 9, 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 18 ends

Boulevard (2021)
In October 2021, a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) was prepared for the Project Site. The PEA concluded that vapor intrusion of VOC’s would result in potential health risks based on maximum site concentrations for all contaminants of concern. As recommended within the Phase II ESA and PEA, the Project would remove the existing clarifier in accordance with local regulations. The contaminated soil on the Project Site would be removed and prior to construction of the new development, the Project would construct a sub-slab vapor barrier system, which would lower the risk of potential vapor exposure. In addition, the Project would incorporate passive design features (ground -level open podium style parking on lower level, and no residences on lower level) that would mitigate vapor intrusion.

Limited Soil – Vapor Sampling Assessment Report, Former Premier Carwash, 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Santa Clara, California, IRC Environmental Consulting, LLC (March 22, 2017)
On February 8, 2017, IRC completed drilling and setting up soil vapor sampling points at 12 locations throughout the Project Site , at depths ranging from 2.65 to 5 feet below ground surface (bgs). Soil cuttings derived from the drilling, reportedly did not exhi bit any odor, staining or discoloration. Furthermore, field screening of the soil cutting did not reveal any elevated levels of total VOCs.

Due to heavy rainy period, and after a three-week equilibrium period, the soil vapor was sampled from each sampling locations on March 2, 2017.

The 12 soil vapor samples were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method TO-

15. All soil vapor samples contained detectable concentration of dichlorodifluoromethane, freon 113, tetrachloroethene, toluene, 1,1,1 - trichloroethane, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, and/or total xylenes, above the laboratory reporting limits; however, the detected concentration of analytes was reportedly well below the applicable residential and commercial/industrial land use screening levels.

Based on the analysis results, IRC concluded that it is unlikely that there are significant widespread concentrations of VOCs in soil vapor above environmental screening levels at the Project Site , and assuming no change in use or redevelopment plans, IRC recommended no additio nal investigation.

However, since the current soil vapor sampling was completed after a heavy rainy season, IRC stated that there is potential for higher concentration of contaminants to exist in soil vapor, if the soil vapor sampling was completed during a drier part of the year. In addition, IRC indicated that further subsurface investigations at the subject property may be warranted in the event of planned subsurface disturbance or change in use to more sensitive receptors.

Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM), Lead Based Paint (LBP) , and CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 19 ends

Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB)
EnviroScience, Inc. (ESI) prepared an Inspection and Sampling Report for Suspect Asbestos -Containing Materials on January 7, 2018. The report was prepared to determine the extent o f asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) present, if any, from the subject building.

A total of 11 bulk asbestos samples were collected and analyzed using polarized light microscopy techniques. Samples consisted of joint compound and texture of interior walls , stucco of exterior walls, interior ceramic grout, carpet glue, wall mastic, window caulking, exterior tile grout, and exterior concrete.

Analysis results indicated that none of the suspect ASMs analyzed contained any detectable asbestos fibers. Based on the results, ESI did not make any specific recommendations for asbestos removal at the Project Site.

Historical Uses
3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Phase I ESA (2021)
According to available historical sources, the Site was formerly undeveloped as early as 1889 and developed as agriculture land, orchard, between 1939 and 1953, including a building in 1953, likely farm- related. The Site was a vacant land in 1956, and by 1957, developed with a commercial real estate office building. By the early 1960s, the Site was developed as an auto wrecking yard (1961) and later as a used auto sales lot (1963-1982), likely associated with the east adjoining property, that was occupied by Century Chrysler Plymouth (1963 -1975) and Camino Camper (1985-1991).

The Site was again vacant land in 1993, the site was graded in 1995, and developed with the existing commercial building in 1996. Since development, the Project Site operated as a car wash. The Site was vacated in 2017 and has been unoccupied since then.

Numerous automotive related businesses have operated on the subject property from at least 1961 to 2017, and as nature of the operation, various forms of hazardous materials and/or waste were likely stored, used, handled and/or generated onsite. Furthermore, previous water/sludge sampling completed in 2004, related to the onsite clarifier, and shallow soil vapor sampling completed in 2017, related to a potential real estate transaction, indicated the presence of petroleum hydrocarbon, metals and/or volatile organic compounds contaminants.

Additionally, the parcel was historically used for agricultural purposes.

There is a potential that agricultural related chemicals, such as pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers may have been used and stored onsite. The subject property is either paved over or covered by building structures that minimize direct contact to any potential remaining concentrations in the soil. Additionally, during previous site development activities, near surface soils (where residual agricultural chemical con centrations would CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 20 ends

have most likely been present, if at all) were generally mixed with fill material or disturbed during grading.

Also, it is common that engineered fill material is placed over underlying soils as part of the development activities. Further more, it is likely that residual agricultural chemicals (if any) would have likely degraded since that site was last utilized for agricultural purposes. These additional variables serve to further reduce the potential for exposure to residual agricultural chemicals (if any). Based on these reasons, the former agricultural operations do not pose an environmental risk at this time.

A review of all major governmental databases was conducted any information related to hazardous materials on, or in the immediate vicinity, of the Project Site. While results showed that nearby properties were listed in the regulatory databases, the Project Site itself was also identified in one regulatory database reviewed. Based on the review of all pertinent regulatory documents, reported release incidents that would represent RECs in connection with the site or a source of a release tha t would be likely to contribute to a vapor encroachment condition (VEC) was identified.

As a part of the Project, the Project Applicant will decommission and remove the existing clarifier onsite . During this process the soils surrounding the clarifier will be tested and removed as needed in accordance with local regulatory guidelines. In addition, a vapor barrier system will be installed to mitigate the potential for vapor intrusion. The vapor barrier would be designed to mitigate volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and follow up sampling would be required to evaluate the effectiveness of the mi tigation efforts. Furthermore, the Project would incorporate passive design features (ground -level open podium style parking on lower level, and no residences on lower level) that would also help to mitigate any potential vapor intrusion. Implementation of these Project components would be done in compliance with regulatory standards, including coordination with the Santa Clara Building Division.

Therefore, with compliance with regulatory requirements and the Project components described above , implementation of the Project wo uld not result in impacts pertaining to the release of or exposure to hazardous substances. Furthermore, the analysis and conclusions of the Phase I ESA and Phase II ESA fully address and resolve the hazards -related analysis required by this criterion: namely, the existence of any release of a hazardous substance on the site and to determine the potential for exposure of future occupants to significant health hazards from any nearby property or activity. Therefore, the Project meets th is criterion (Attachment E1 and E2).
(5) The TPP does not have a significant effect on historical resources pursuant to Section 21084.1.

A Cultural Resources Study for the Project was prepared by Eileen Barrow, M.A/R.P.A of Tom Oringer and Associates on September 15, 2021 (Attachment G), to identify historical resources on and in the vicinity of the Project Site to assess any potential impa cts the Project may have X
CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 21 ends

on identified historical resources.24
According to the Study, there are two buildings onsite with the addresses of 3939 Stevens Creek Boulevard and 3911 Stevens Creek Boulevard .

The first building (3939 Stevens Creek Boulevard ) was constructed in 1962 and is a rectangular building constructed of concrete blocks. The front (south side) of the building was once all glass windows; however, these have been covered with wood.

Although it is on a separate parcel, the second building ( 3911 Stevens Creek Boulevard) is a two-story building connected to the east side of the first building and is curved to match the curve of the front of the parcel.

The façade is covered with a combination of stone and brick. The front of the bottom story is a combination of glass doors and large glass windows.

There is a ribbon of single paned windows across the majority of the second story. County records state that this building was constructed in 1966.

Behind the main building at 3939 Stevens Creek Boule vard is a narrow rectangular building with several open bays. This building is also constructed with concrete blocks, but the exterior is covered with tiles.

This building and the front building are connected by a breezeway.

Historical research of the property at 3939 Stevens Creek Boulevard showed that the building was constructed in 1962. Research was limited because Santa Clara County departments were closed due to COVID.

Newspaper advertisements suggest that the first business in the building was a car dealership and a driving school (Los Gatos Times -Saratoga Observer 1964). It appears that between 1970 and 1987 the property was an RV dealership (Santa Cruz Sentinel 1987). For a brief time in the early 1990s, it housed a specialty rug store (San Francisco Examiner 1994). In at least 2007 and 2008, the location was used as a Hummer dealership (San Francisco Examiner 2007, 2008). A music store currently occupies the building.

The building on the Project Site and nearly all of the buildings surrounding the Site are modern and are too young to be considered potentially eligible for inclusion on the California or National registers.

For purposes of the National Register, the importance of a resource is evaluated in terms of criteria put forth in 36CFR60 (see below). Eligibility criteria for the California Register (Title 14 CCR, §4852) are very similar; and is thereby not presented within the Cultural Resources Study (Appendix G). The quality of significance is present in properties that possess integrity o f location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and:

A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or
B. That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our

24 Barrow, E. 2021. Cultural Resources Study for The Meridian Project 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Santa Clara, Santa Clara County, California Prepared by: Eileen Barrow, M.A./R.P.A. Tom Origer & Associates. Prepared for: CRP Affordable Housing & Community Development on September 15, 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 22 ends

past; or
C. That embody the distinct characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or
D. That have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

The only buildings that meet the age threshold for consideration to the California or National registers are the bu ildings at 3939 and 3911 Stevens Creek Boulevard , which were constructed in 1962 and 1966, respectively.

Although these buildings could be considered important under the context of post-World War II development, these buildings are not associated with the history of the City of Santa Clara in an individually significant way and so they do not meet Criterion A of the National Register (or Criterion 1 of the California Register). The buildings are not associated with any people important to the history of Sa nta Clara; therefore, they do not meet Criterion B of the National Register (or Criterion 2 of the California Register). The buildings are not distinctive architecturally and so do not meet Criterion C of the National Register (Criterion 3 of the Californi a Register). The b uildings have not yielded or may be likely to yield, important information regarding prehistory or history and so do not generally meet Criterion D of the National Register (Criterion 4 of the California Register).

Therefore, the Project would not materially alter in an adverse manner the known historical resources per Section 15064.5(b) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, the Project meets this criterion. (6) The TPP site is not subject to any of the following:
(a) A wildland fire hazard, as determined by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, unless the applicable general plan or zoning ordinance contains provisions to mitigate the risk of a wildland fire hazard.

As described above and recognized in the Plan Bay Area 2040 , the Project Site is located in a highly urbanized area of the City. The Project Site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone pursuant to the CALFIRE, nor has the Site been designated as fire hazard or other hazard zone within the City General Plan.25,26 Therefore, the Project Site is not subject to a wildland fire hazard, and the Project meets this criterion. (b) An unusually high risk of fire or explosion from materials stored or used on nearby properties;
X

25 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire). 2008. Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA as Recommended by CalFire, Santa Clara County. Adopted October 8, 2008. 26 City of Santa Clara. 2014. City of Santa Clara General Plan, Chapter 5. Adopted December 9, 2014. Accessed September 24, 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 23 ends

As concluded by the Phase I ESA, there are a limited number of sites of environmental concern in the Project vicinity; however, due to the distance to the Project Site and the lack of evidence regarding prior releases of hazardous materials, the risk of release of hazardous materials from these identified sites is considered unlikely. Accordingly, the Project Site is not subject to an unusually high risk of fire or explosion from materials stored or used on nearby properties or a risk of public health hazard in excess of federal or state standards. Therefore, the Project meets this criterion.

(c) Risk of a public health exposure at a level that would exceed the standards established by any state or federal agency.

The Phase I ESA , prepared for the Project i dentified the Project Site as listed in the California Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS), as a site that was permitted to operate as a generator of hazardous waste from approximately 1998 to 2007; however, no reportable quantity of waste was available, and no releases or violations are indicate d (Attachment E1). As noted above, the Project would remove the existing clarifier in accordance with local regulations. The contaminated soil on the Project Site would be removed and prior to construction of the new development, the Project would construct a sub-slab vapor barrier system, which would lower the risk of potential vapor exposure. In addition, the Project would incorporate passive design features (ground -level open podium style parking on lower level, and no residences on lower level) that wou ld mitigate vapor intrusion. Thus, the potential for risk of fire or explosion during construction is not anticipated. Furthermore, the Project proposes residential and ground-floor commercial uses that typically are not known for the use or storage of haz ardous materials. Should hazardous materials be used or stored onsite, they would be required to comply with existing regulatory standards. Therefore, the Project would not result in public health exposure at a level that would exceed the standards established by any state or federal agency, and, thus, meets this criterion. (d) Seismic risk as a result of being within a delineated earthquake fault zon e, as determined pursuant to Section 2622, or a seismic hazard zone, as determined pursuant to Section 2696, unless the applicable general plan or zoning ordinance contains provisions to mitigate the risk of an earthquake fault or seismic hazard zone.

As discussed in the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation prepared for the Project by CTE Cal , Inc. in September 2021 (Attachment H) , t he Project Site is not located within a currently established Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone or a fault zone mapped by the State Geologist pursuant to the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act. 27 Additionally, the Project Site is not located approximately eight miles away from the nearest fault,

27 California Department of Conservation. 2021. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Website. Available at:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/. Accessed September 24, 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 24 ends

as identified in the City of Santa Clara General Plan .28 No active faults are known to pass through the immediate Project vicinity. The closest active fault to the Project Site, the Hayward fault, is located approximately five miles east.29 While blind thrust faults and others in the region do not present a potential surface rupture hazard at the Project Site, these faults are considered active features capable of generating future earthquakes that could result in moderate to significant ground shaking at the Project Site.30
However, the Project would be required to comply with the existing building, grading, and seismic regulations of the Santa Clara City Code, which incorporates the Uniform Buildin g Code (UBC) and California Building Code (CBC). In addition, the Project would be required to comply with Santa Clara City Code Chapter 15.15 (Building Code) , which requires the Santa Clara Building Division to review and approve a final design-level geotechnical report for the Project prior to the issuance of grading permits. Furthermore, the final geotechnical report would incorporate the building design recommendations contained in the existing geology report prepared for the Project.

Because the Project Site is not located within a designated earthquake fault or seismic hazard zone, the Project would not result in seismic risk as a result of being within a delineated earthquake fault zone or a seismic hazard zone, and the Project meets this criterion.
(e) Landslide hazard, flood plain, flood way, or restriction zone unless the applicable general plan or zoning ordinance
contains provisions to mitigate the risk of a landslide or flood.

The Project Site is not within a landslide zone, a fault rupture zone, or a tsunami inundation zone. 31,32 The Project Site is not located in a dam inundation or special flood hazard area according to the Santa Clara General Plan.33
Although the Project is located within a liquefaction zone as identified within the Santa Clara General Plan, according to the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation (Appendix H), groundwater levels in the vicinity of the Project Site are estimated to be approximately 45 to 60 feet below existing grade. Nevertheless, the Project Applicant would include a non -

28 City of Santa Clara. 2014. City of Santa Clara General Plan, Chapter 5. Adopted December 9, 2014. Accessed September 24, 2021.
29 City of Santa Clara. 2014. City of Santa Clara General Plan, Figure 5.10-2. Adopted December 9, 2014.

Accessed September 24, 2021.
30 CTE Cal, Inc. 2021. Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for the Meridian, 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Santa Clara, California 95051, CTE Job No. 60-1002G, September 13, 2021. 31 California Department of Conservation. 2021. California Tsunami Maps and Data. Available at https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/tsunami/maps, accessed September 24, 2021. 32 California Department of Conservation. 2021. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Website. Available at:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/. Accessed September 24, 2021. 33 City of Santa Clara. 2014. City of Santa Clara General Plan, PDF page 91. Adopted December 9, 2014. Accessed September 24, 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 25 ends

liquefiable capping layer to prevent surface manifestation of any potential liquefaction that occurs below 60 feet.

Additionally, according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel #06085C0228H, the Project Site is located outside of any Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) and is identified as being within Zone X, which are areas determined to be outside of the 0.2 percent annual change floodplain. 34 Furthermore, based on the Phase I ESA, no wetlands were identified at the Project Site or adjoining/immediately surrounding properties and , therefore, the risk of flooding from a seismically induced seiche is remote.

Therefore, the Project would not result in landslide hazard, flood plain, flood way, or restriction zone impacts, and the Project meets this criterion. (7) The TPP site is not located on developed open space. (a) For the purposes of this paragraph, “developed open space” means land that meets all of the following criteria:
i. Is publicly owned or financed in whole or in part by public funds.
ii. Is generally open to, and available for use by, the public.
iii. Is predominantly lacking in structural development other than structures associated with open spaces,
including, but not limited to, playgrounds, swimming
pools, ballfields, enclosed play areas, and picnic
facilities.

The Project Site does not meet all of the "developed open space" criteria above, as it is entirely privately owned, and not open to or available for use by the public. The Project Site is also designated and zoned for Very High Density Mixed uses and is not designated or zoned for open space purposes.35 Moreover, the Project Site is currently developed with an existing structure and associated parking area, which is fenced off and not accessible to the public . While there is minimal landscaping, it is provided for the private use of the adjacent residential and commercial uses and does not contain active or passive recreational facilities that are open to the public. Surrounding properties share the same land use and zoning designations as the Project Site and are built out with residential and commercial uses. The nearest park to the Project Site is Parkway Park, approximately 0.4 miles northeast of the Project Site. Therefore, the Project Site is not located on developed open space, and the Project meets this criterion.

X
(8) The buildings in the TPP are 15 percent more energy efficient than required by Chapter 6 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, and the buildings and landscaping are designed to X

34 Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA). 2021. FEMA’s National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) Viewer.

Available at https://www.fema.gov/flood-maps, accessed September 24, 2021. 35 City of Santa Clara. 2021. MAP Santa Clara – Property Report for 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard. Available at https://map.santaclaraca.gov/public/index.html?viewer=regional, accessed September 24, 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 26 ends

achieve 25 percent less water usage than the average household use in the region.

As shown by the CEQA SCPE Energy & Water Efficiency Compliance Memo prepared for the Project (Attachment D2), the Project’s energy use would be 15.1 percent less than the standards required by Title 24, Part 6 (2019). Moreover, the Project’s water use per household would be 38.6 percent below the regional baseline for the City of Santa Clara (150.6 gallons per household). The Project would achieve its energy efficiency through the implementation of multiple measures including, but not limited to, enhanced exterior wall and roof insulation, high -reflectance roofing, central water heating systems, light -emitting diode (LED) lighting, and low-flow plumbing fixtures. The Project would achieve its water efficiency through multiple measures including high efficiency water -using appliances such as clothes washers and dishwashers, and efficient irrigation systems in compliance with the California Green Building Code.

Thus, the Project meets this criterion.

PRC § 21155.1(b). The TPP complies with all of the following land use criteria:

Consistent?
Yes No
(1) The site of the TPP is not more than eight acres in total area.

The Project would develop a 59-unit apartment building on a 25,300 square foot lot (0.58-acre). Therefore, the Project Site is less than eight acres in total area, and the Project meets this criterion.

X
(2) The TPP does not contain more than 200 residential units.

The Project would develop exactly 59 residential units. Therefore, the Project would not contain more than 200 residential units and meets this criterion.

X
(3) The TPP does not result in any net los s in the number of affordable housing within the project area.

The Project Site is currently improved with an existing structure that contains vacant commercial space and an associated parking area. The Project would provide 59 affordable housing units fo r Very Low Income households, subsequently resulting in a net increase in the number of affordable housing units in the Project area. Therefore, the Project meets this criterion.

X
(4) The TPP does not include any single level building exceeding 75,000 square feet.

The Project would include 88,087 square feet in the new 6-story building.

The largest level would be approximately 18,325 square feet. Therefore, the Project does not include any single-level building exceeding 75,000 square feet and meets this criterion.

X
(5) Any applicable mitigation measures or performance standards or criteria set forth in the prior environmental impacts, and adopted in findings, have been or will be incorporated into the X
CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 27 ends

TPP.

There are no prior EIRs, or other environmental documents prepare d specifically for the Project Site. The most relevant prior EIR for the Project is the ABAG Plan Bay Area 2040 Program EIR (2040 PEIR), which was adopted in July 2017, and the ABAG Plan Area 2050 Program EIR (2050 PEIR), which was adopted in October 2021 . The 2040 and 2050 PEIRs include Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program s (MMRP), which provides a list of mitigation measures ABAG determined a lead agency can and should consider, as applicable and feasible, where the agency has identified that a project has the potential for significant effects.36,37 While the ABAG mitigation measures should only be applied to projects that have the potential for significant effects, a discussion of applicability of these measures is contained in Attachment F . As described therein, many of the mitigation measures identified by ABAG would not apply to the Project and, therefore, would not be incorporated. In addition, as discussed in Attachment F, the Project will already substantially comply with a number of th e MMRP’s mitigation measures through its required compliance with various State, regional, and local regulatory requirements, as well as its implementation of various conditions of approval. The Plan Bay Area 2040 and 2050 PEIR MMRPs also include various m itigation measures at the regional level that would be implemented by ABAG and are therefore not discussed in Attachment F. (6) The TPP is determined not to conflict with nearby operating industrial uses.

According to MAP Santa Clara, there are no parcels near the Project Site that are zoned for industrial use. 38 An aerial review of land uses on Google Maps revealed that this area is comprised of a mix of uses, including commercial development, residential uses, and mixed-use development.

As described above, uses to the south, across Stevens Creek Boulevard, are zoned General Commercial (GC) and Neighborhood Commercial (CN). Uses to the east, are zoned Thoroughfare Commercial (CT). Uses to the west, across Buckingham Drive, are zoned Planned Development (PD). Land uses located to the north, is zoned Moderate Density Multiple Dwelling (R3-25D). Given the nearby uses, there is no significant potential for a land use or operational conflict occurring between the Project and nearby operating industrial uses. Acc ordingly, the Project would not conflict with any nearby operating industrial uses and meets this criterion.

36 Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2013. Plan Bay Area 2040. Adopted 2017, accessed September 23, 2021.
37 Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2013. Plan Bay Area 2040 – Final EIR Appendix A. Adopted 2013, accessed September 23, 2021.
38 City of Santa Clara. 2021. MAP Santa Clara – Property Report for 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard. Available at https://map.santaclaraca.gov/public/index.html?viewer=regional, accessed September 24, 2021.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 28 ends

(7) The TPP is located within one-half mile of a rail transit station or a ferry terminal included in a RTP or within one-quarter mile of a high-quality transit corridor included in an RTP.

As noted above, the Project Site is located on Stevens Creek Boulevard, near the Stevens Creek Boulevard/Saratoga Avenue bus stop and the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Saratoga Avenue . This portion of Steven’s Creek Boulevard has been designated as a High - Quality Transit Corridor and within a TPA by ABAG/MTC Plan Bay Area 2040 and Plan Bay Area 2050 . Therefore, the Project Site satisfies this criterion.

X
PRC § 21155.1(c). The TPP complies meets at least one of the following three criteria:

Consistent?
Yes No
(1) The TPP meets both of the following:
(a) At least 20 percent of the housing would be sold to families of moderate income, or not less than 10 percent of the
housing would be rented to families of low income, or not less than 5 percent of the housing is rented to families of very low income.
(b) The TPP developer provides sufficient legal commitments to the appropriate local agency to ensure the continued availability and use of the housing units for very low, low-, and moderate -income households at monthly housing
costs with an affordable housing cost or affordable rent, as defined in Section 50052.5 or 50053 of the Health and
Safety Code, respectively, for the period required by the applicable financing. Rental units shall be affordable for at least 55 years. Ownership units shall be subject to resale restrictions or equity sharing requirements for at least 30 years.
(2) The transit priority project developer has paid or will pay in- lieu fees pursuant to a local ordinance in an amount sufficient to result in the development of an equivalent number of units that would otherwise be required pursuant to paragraph (1). (3) The transit priority project provides public open space equal to or greater than five acres per 1,000 residents of the project.

In accordance with criterion 1, the Project would provide 100 percent of its total units (59 affordable units of 59 total units) to families of Very Low Income. Pursuant to SB 1818 (Government Code Section 65915), Santa Clara City Code Chapter 17.40 (Citywide Affordable Housing Requirements), and the Project’s condit ions of approval, the Applicant shall record a covenant against the Project Site ensuring the continued availability and use of the Project’s 59 Very Low Income units for a period of at least 55 years. Therefore, the Project meets this criterion.

CEQA Exemption
City of Santa Clara 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Project Sustainable Communities Project CEQA Exemption December 2021

Page 29 ends

Resolution/3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 1 of 4
Rev: 11/22/17
RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA CLARA , CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES PROJECT EXEMPTION

TO EXEMPT THE PROJECT FROM CEQA REVIEW FOR
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3941 STEVENS CREEK

BOULEVARD, SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA

PLN21-15213 (3941 Steven Creek Blvd)

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, Steven Blanden , CRP Affordable Housing and Community Development (“Applicant”) applied for a development application to allow the construction of a new 59- unit 100% affordable mixed -use project at 3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard , Santa Clara (“Project Site”);
WHEREAS, the development application involves Archit ectural Review of the development proposal to construct a six-story, 59-unit residential apartment building, with 1,750 square feet of amenity space, 2,630 square feet of ground floor commercial/office space, and an outdoor podium courtyard with play areas , ground floor parking, landscaping and site improvements (“Project”);
WHEREAS, the Project Site is currently zoned as CT – Thoroughfare Commercial and has the General Plan land use designation of Community Mixed-use; WHEREAS, in order to implement the proposed development, the City Council needs to find that the project qualif ies as a transit priority project in accordance with the state Sustainable Communities Strategy Criteria, Public Resources Code § 21155, et seq.; WHEREAS, the applicant filed a preliminary application under Senate Bill 330 (2019) on July 8, 2021 and a formal application for architectural review on September 20, 2021 for the proposed Project;

Resolution/3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 2 of 4
Rev: 11/22/17
WHEREAS, the Project is within one -half mile from the intersection of two bus routes, VTA bus line 57 on Kiely Boulevard and line 23 on Stevens Creek Boulevard , each of which have 15 minute headways during peak commute hours, which qualifies the location as a “major transit stop”;
WHEREAS, the applicant is relying upon AB 3194 (2018) to utilize the Very High Density Mixed-use (VHDMU) zoning district;
WHEREAS, the project will be 100% affordable, and the developer is seeking a “super” density bonus under the Density Bonus Law (AB 1763) (2019); WHEREAS, California Public Resources Code § 21 155 et seq., requires the legislative body of a public agency to make a determination as to whether or not the project qualifies as a Sustainable Communities Project and is therefore exempt from CEQA review, in accordance with PRC Section 21155.1;
WHEREAS, the Applicant prepared a Sustainable Communities Project Exemption declaring compliance with all criteria under PRC Section 21155.1 , as set forth in Attachment 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and, WHEREAS, on January 25, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the architectural approval of the Project and the approve the Sustainable Communities Project Exemption , at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to present evidence and provide testimony, both in favor of and in opposition to the proposed Project.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

Resolution/3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 3 of 4
Rev: 11/22/17

1. That the City Council hereby finds that the above Recitals are true and correct and by this reference makes them a part hereof.

2. That the City Council hereby finds that the Project qualifies as a transit priority project pursuant to PRC Section 21155, which by definition means that the Project square footage is at least 50% residential (here, 92.6%), provides a minimum net density of at least 20 units per acre (here, 101.7 du/ac); and is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop (here, 135 feet) . As detailed in Attachment 1, the Transit Priority Pro ject is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the project area in the Regional Transpiration Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (Plan Bay Area).

3. That the City Council hereby finds that all environmental criteria of PRC § 21155.1(a) are met, all land use criteria of PRC § 21155.1(b) are met, and the affordable housing criteria of PRC § 21155(c)(1) are met.

4. That the City Council hereby approves the use of the Sustainable Communities Project Exemption to exempt the project from CEQA review, in accordance with PRC Section 21155.1.

5. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSE D

AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 25th DAY OF JANUARY 2022, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCILORS:

NOES: COUNCILORS:

ABSENT: COUNCILORS:

Resolution/3941 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 4 of 4
Rev: 11/22/17
ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS:

ATTEST:

NORA PIMINTEL, MMC

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA

Attachments incorporated by reference:

1. Sustainable Communities Project Exemption

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 1 of 17

CONDITIONS OF REZONING APPROVAL
3941 Stevens Creek Blvd (The Meridian)
PLN21-15213

In addition to complying with all applicable codes, regulations, ordinances and resolutions, the following conditions of approval are recommended:

GENERAL
G1. If relocation o f an existing public facility becomes necessary due to a conflict with the developer's new improvements, then the cost of said relocation shall be borne by the developer.

G2. Comply with all applicable codes, regulations, ordinances and resolutions.

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
A1. The Developer agrees to defend and indemn ify and hold City, its officers, agents, employees, officials and representatives free and harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, attorneys' fees, injuries, costs, and liabilities a rising from any suit for damages or for equitable o r injunctive relief which is filed by a third party against the City by reason of its approval of developer's project.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

BUILDING DIVISION
BD1. Informational: Prior to overall construction permit application, submit to the Santa Clara Building Division, 2 copies of an addressing diagram request, to be prepared by a licensed architect or engineer. The addressing diagram(s) shall include all proposed streets and all building floor plans. The addressing diagram(s) shall conform to Santa Clara City Manager Directive #5; Street Name and Building Number Changes, and Santa Clara Building Division Address Policy For Residential and Commercial Developments. The addressing diagram(s) shall indicate all unit numbers to be based off established streets, not alleys nor access-ways to garages. Allow a minimum of 10 working days for initial staff review. Please note city staff policy that existing site addresses typically are retired. Provide digital pdf printed from design software, not scanned from printed paper sheet.

BD2. Informational: The construction permit application drawings submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include a copy of the latest Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Zone Map: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home. The project drawings shall indicate how the project complies with the Santa Clara Flood Damage Prevention Code.

BD3. Informational: The construction permit application drawings submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Low Impact Development (LID) practices http://www.scvurppp- w2k.com/nd_wp.shtml. All projects that disturb more than one acre, or projects that are part of a larger development that in total disturbs more than one acre, shall comply with the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Best Management Practices (BMP): http://www.scvurppp-w2k.com/construction_bmp.shtml, and shall provide a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by a certified Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). All site drainage and grading permit applications submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include a city of Santa Clara "C3" data form, available on this web page:https://www.santaclaraca.gov/our-city/departments-g- z/public-works/environmental-programs/stormwater-pollution-prevention and will be routed to a contract consultant for review.

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 17 BD4. Informational: no California construction code review is being done at this time. The construction permit application drawings submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include an overall California Building Code analysis, including; proposed use and occupancy of all spaces (19' CBC Ch. 3), all building heights and areas (19' CBC Ch. 5), all proposed types of construction (19' CBC Ch. 6), all proposed fire and smoke protection features, including all types of all fire rated penetrations proposed (19' CBC Ch. 7), all proposed interior finishes fire resistance (19' CBC Ch. 8), all fire protection systems proposed (19' CBC Ch. 9), and all means of egress proposed (19' CBC Ch. 10). -Noncombustible exterior wall, floor, and roof finishes are strongly encouraged.  During construction retaining a single company to install all fire rated penetrations is highly recommended.
 The grade level lobbies shall be min.1 hour rated all sides and above.  All stair shafts shall be min. 1 hour rated.
 All elevator shafts shall be min. 1 hour rated.
 All trash chute shafts shall be min. 1 hour rated.
 Recommendation: provide a minimum of two trash chutes; one for recyclables, one for trash, each trash chute to be routed down to a grade level trash collection room.
 Any trash rooms shall be min. 1 hour rated all sides and above.

BD5. Informational: The overall project construction permit application shall include the geotechnical, architectural, structural, energy, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing drawings and calculations. Prior to the issuance of the overall project construction permit, a conditions of approval review meeting must be held in city hall, which meeting must be attended by the on-site field superintendent(s). The meeting will not be held without the attendance of the on-site field superintendent(s). The on-site grading permit shall be a separate permit application to the Building Division.

HOUSING & COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION
H1. The calculated affordable unit requirement for the proposed project is 8.85 affordable units on site. This is based on the 59 proposed units. The calculation of the affordable housing requirements results in a fractional unit (.85); the Applicant shall either pay an in -lieu fee of $116,516.78 or provide an additional unit to satisfy the requirement. Please note that the in -lieu fee is an estimate and may change if there are changes to the proposed plans.

H2. The Applicant shall provide units to affordable households made available at affordable rental prices to extremely low, very low, low and/or moderate-income households as long as the distribution of affordable units averages to a maximum of 100 percent of Area Median Income.

H3. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the Developer shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) with the City that will determine the affordable rents and apply all terms and covenants guaranteeing the prescribed affordability, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. Satisfaction of the affordable housing obligation shall be memorialized in the AHA and subject to City Council approval. There will be a fee for the AHA preparation in the amount of $5113 that will be due prior to execution of the AHA. Additionally, there is an annual monitoring fee per affordable unit in the amount $119. Please note all fees are based on the current Municipal Fee Schedule in effect at the time the project is approved and must be paid prior to the issuance of the occupancy certificate of the building.

PLANNING DIVISION
P1. Obtain required permits and inspections from the Building Official and comply with the conditions thereof. If this project involves land area of 1 acre or more, the developer shall file a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the State Water Resources Control Board prior to issuance of any building permit for grading, or construction; a copy of the NOI shall be

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 17 sent to the City Building Inspection Division. A storm water pollution prevention plan is also required with the NOI.

P2. Comply with all requirements of Building and associated codes (the CBC. CEC, CMC, CPC, California Green Building Code, the California Energy Code, etc.) current at the time of application for Building Permit, that includes grading and site utility permits.

P3. It shall be the Developer's responsibility through his engineer to provide written certification that the drainage designs for the subject property will prevent flood water intrusion in the event of a storm of 100-year return period. The Developer's engineer shall verify that the site will be protected from off-site water intrusion by designing the on-site grading and storm water collection system using the 100-year hydraulic grade line elevation provided by the City's Engineering Department or the Federal Flood Insurance Rate Map, whichever is more restrictive. Said certification shall be submitted to the City Building Inspection Division prior to issuance of building permits.

P4. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, Developer/Owner shall have an asbestos survey of the proposed site performed by a certified individual. Survey results and notice of the proposed demolition are to be sent to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). No demolition shall be performed without a demolition permit and BAAQMD approval and, if necessary, proper asbestos removal.

P5. Incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) into construction plans and incorporate post construction water runoff measures into project plans in accordance with the City’s Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program standards prior to the issuance of permits.

Proposed BMPs shall be submitted to and thereafter reviewed and approved by the Planning Division and the Building Inspection Division for incorporation into construction drawings and specifications.

P6. An erosion control plan shall be prepared and copies provided to the Planning Division and to the Building Inspection Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits or building permits that involve substantial disturbance of substantial ground area.

P7. The Final Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) must be certified by a third-party consultant from SCVURPP’s current list of qualified consultants. Five copies of the approval letter from the certified third party review (wet stamped and signed) must be submitted prior to the issuance of grading or building permit.

P8. Prior to the issuance final occupancy, the applicant shall enter into Operations and Maintenance (O&M) agreement with the City. The project operator is responsible for the operations and maintenance of the SWMP and stormwater BMPs consistent with the O&M agreement throughout the life of the project.

P9. Trees permitted by the City for removal shall provide replacement on- or off-site at a 2:1 ratio with 24-inch box or a 1:1 with 36” box.

P10. Site landscaping shall be maintained in good condition throughout the life of the Project and no trees shall be removed without City review and approval.

P11. Developer is responsible for collection and pick-up of all trash and debris on-site and adjacent public right-of-way.

P12. Minor changes to the project would be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.

P13. Developer shall comply with all standards in the Sustainable Communities Criteria as documented in the Sustainable Communities Project Exemption, in accordance to Public Resource Code Section 21155.

P14. Developer shall comply with all provisions under Assembly Bill 3194 to maintain and conform with all standards in the Very High-Density Mixed-use Zoning District.

P15. Developer shall comply with all provisions under Density Bonus Law Assembly Bill 1763.

P16. Construction activity not confined within a building shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. weekdays and not permitted on Saturdays and Sundays for projects within 300 feet of a residential use. Construction activity confined within a building shall

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 4 of 17 be limited to the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. following on weekdays other than holidays, Monday through Friday, inclusive; and within the hours of 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. following, inclusive, on any Saturday which is not a holiday. Construction activity shall not be allowed on recognized State holidays, as noted in Section 9.10.230 of the SCCC, as amended.

ENGINEERING
E1. Obtain site clearance through Public Works Department prior to issuance of Building Permit. Site clearance will require payment of applicable development fees. Other requirements may be identified for compliance during the site clearance process.

Contact Public Works Department at (408) 615-3000 for further information.

E2. All work within the public right -of-way and/or public easement, which is to be performed by the Developer/Owner, the general contractor, and all subcontractors shall be included within a Single Encroachment Permit issued by the City Public Works Department.

Issuance of the Encroachment Permit and payment of all appropriate fees s hall be completed prior to commencement of work, and all work under th e permit shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permit.

E3. Submit public improvement plans prepared in accordance with City Public Works Department procedures which provide for t he installation of public improvements. Plans shall be prepared by a R egistered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to approval and recordation of subdivision map and/or issuance of building permits.

E4. All work within City of San Jose boun daries shall require a City of San Jose encroachment permit.

E5. Existing non-standard or non -ADA compliant frontage improvements shall be replaced with current City standard frontage improvements as directed by the City Engineer or his designee.

E6. Developer sha ll provide a complete storm drain study for the 10 -year and 100 -year storm events. The grading plans shall include the overland release for the 100 -year storm event and any localized flooding areas. System improvements, if needed, will be at developer’s expense.

E7. Composite utility plans shall show all proposed and existing ut ility with lateral sizes, pipe materials, slopes, and proposed trees.

E8. 6” sanitary sewer lateral shall connect by “Tap -Tite” connection minimum 5’ downstream from existing sanitary sewer manhole. 8” sanitary sewer lateral shall connect to sanitary sewer main at existing manhole. Property line cleanouts/manholes shall be constructed.

E9. Storm drain laterals shall be 12” minimum. Property line cleanouts/manholes shall be constructed.

E10. Private s torm drain trench shall not be located within the public right-of-way or underground easement areas.

E11. Sanitary sewer and storm drain mains and laterals shall be outside the drip line of mature trees or ten (10) feet clear of the tree trunk, whichever is gre ater, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director.

E12. Dedicate required on -site easements for any new public utilities, and/or emergency vehicle access by means of subdivision map or approved instrument at time of development.

E13. Dedicate sidewalk easements along the project frontage where public sidewalks extend into private property. Sidewalk easements are to be 1’ behind proposed back of walk where there is landscaping behind sidewalk. Sidewalk easement where hardscape is behind sidewalk is to be at back -of-walk. Cold joint is required between public sidewalk and private hardscape.

E14. Stevens Creek Boulevard along the project frontage is planned to be paved by the City of San Jose in 2022 with a 2” mill and overlay. After pavement work is completed, no

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 5 of 17 pavement cuts are permitted for a period of 5 years per the Cit y pavement moratorium (Ordinance No. 1998).

E15. Slurry seal the full street width of Buckingham Drive along the project frontage.

E16. Traffic improvements must comply with the City of Santa Clara Standard S pecifications for Public Works Construction
E17. Landscaping i mprovements within 10 feet of a driveway must be less than 3 feet or greater than 10 feet per City Standard Detail TR-9.

E18. All on-site structures must be clear of Driveway and Corner Visibility Clearan ce Areas per City Standard Detail TR-9.

E19. Gated entrance shall be a minimum of 25 feet from the property line.

E20. Non-residential bicycle parking shall be 1 Class I spaces (5% of tenant vehicle parking) and 2 Class II spaces (5% of visitor vehicle parking) per 2019 California Building Code

5.106.4
E21. Residential bicycle parking shall be 20 Class I spaces (one per 3 dwelling units) and 4 Class II spaces (one per 15 dwelling units) per 2007 VTA Bicycle Technical Guidelines.

E22. Class I and Class II bicycle parking, as defined in SCMC 18.74.075, shall be conveniently accessi ble from the street, within 200 feet of a building entrance and/or highly visible areas.

E23. Sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5 feet.

E24. Driveways shall be in compliance with City Standard Detail ST-8.

E25. Project frontage corner at Stevens Creek Boulevard and Buckin gham Drive shall have a 25-foot curb radius [Pedestrian Master Plan Policy 2.A.5: Where feasible, shorten crossing distances using complete streets strategies]
E26. Project frontage corner shall have one new curb ramp in accordance with City Standard Detail ST-14 [Pedestrian Master Plan Policy 2.A.8: Prioritize improvements that improve connectivity and remove physical barriers to walking at road crossings] E27. Submit Vehicle Miles Travel or exemption and ve hicle trip calculations in accordance with the City transportation policy
E28. https://www.santaclaraca.gov/our-city/departments-g-z/public-works/engineering/traffic- engineering/transportation-analysis-policy-update
E29. A traffic analysis is not required as the pro ject will generate less than 100 peak hour trips.

E30. Driveway Design shall comply with City Standard Detail TR-9.

E31. Remove existing green curb on Stevens Creek Boulevard. All existing signed parking restrictions and time limits on Stevens Creek Boulevard and Bu ckingham Drive shall remain in-place.

SILICON VALLEY POWER
SVP1. Relocation of streetlight/fiber conduits along Stevens Creek Blvd required due to conflict with trees.

SVP2. No Bioretention areas within 5’ of SVP conduits or manholes.

SVP3. New SVP Transformer pad is required. Pad must be 10’ away from building walls with windows, doors, vents, etc. Between sidewalk and transformer apron can not have any seeding placed. Please furnish area with concrete or other hard surfaces that can be driven over.

SVP4. Applicant Design Process available to Developer to expedite electric substructure design after the PCC process. Reach out to SVP to initiate process. Otherwise once building permit is applied for it will be assigned to an SVP estimator who will add it to their queue of work. Once it reaches the top of the queue, they will begin on the electric design for this site otherwise down as a developers work drawing. A completed developers work drawing is needed to approve both an encroachment permits and final building permit SVP5. Clearances:
a. EQUIPMENT

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 6 of 17 i. Ten (10) foot minimum clearance is required in front of equipment access doors. (UG1000 sheet 11)
ii. Five (5) foot minimum clearance from pad is required on sides without equipment access doors. (UG1000 sheet 11)
iii. Eighteen (18) foot minimum width, shall be provided and maintained on one side of the equipment pad to allow an electric dept. line truck to drive up next to the pad for installation and maintenance of equipment. (UG1000 Sheet 11).
iv. Barrier pipes are required only on sides accessible to vehicles. (UG1000 Sheet 12).

1. Thirty (30) inches from side of equipment sides.

2. Forty Eight (48) inches in front of access doors.
a. Barrier Pipes in front of access doors shall be removable. b. CONDUITS
i. Five (5) foot minimum longitudinal clearance between new conduits or piping systems (open trench installation) and any existing or proposed SVP conduit system. This is for longitudinal. (UG1250 sheet 5) ii. Twelve (12) inch minimum vertical clearance between new conduit/pipes installed perpendicular to existing SVP conduits for open trench installations. (UG1000 sheet 36, UG1250 Sheet 6)
iii. Three (3) foot six (6) inches clearance is required from poles for open trench installation. Exceptions are for riser conduit. (UG1250 Sheet 7) iv. Three (3) foot minimum clearance is required between sign posts, barrier pipes or bollards, fence posts, and other similar structures. ( UG1250 sheet 10).
v. Five (5) foot minimum from new splice boxes, pull boxes, manholes, vaults, or similar subsurface facilities. (UG1000 sheet 8) vi. Five (5) foot minimum clearance from walls, footings, retaining wall, landscape planter, tree root barrier or other subsurface wall or structure. (UG1250 sheet 9).
vii. Five (5) foot minimum clearance is required between fire hydrant thrust block. The thrust block extends 5’ foot on either side of the fire hydrant in line with the radial water pipe connected to the hydrant. c. VAULTS/MANHOLES
i. Ten (10) foot minimum clearance is required between adjacent Vaults or Manholes.
ii. Five (5) foot minimum clearance is required between adjacent conduits. iii. Minimum 36” from face of curb, or bollards required. d. Poles (Electrolier, Guy Stub poles, service clearance poles, self-supporting steel poles and lighting poles.)
i. Three (3) foot six (6) inches clearance is required from poles for open trench installation. Exceptions are for riser conduit. (UG1250 Sheet 7) e. Guy Anchors
i. Five (5) foot minimum clearance is required between center of anchor line and any excavation area. (UG1250 sheet 15).
f. Trees
i. OH 1230 for Overhead Lines
ii. SD 1235 for Tree Planting Requirements near UG Electric Facilities SVP6. Reference listed SVP standards for clearances.
a. Installation of Underground Substructures by Developers b. UG1250 – Encroachment Permit Clearances from Electric Facilities c. UG0339 – Remote Switch Pad
d. OH1230 – Tree Clearances From Overhead Electric Lines

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 7 of 17 e. SD1235 – Tree Planting Requirements Near Underground Electric Facilities SVP7. Prior to submitting any project for Electric Department review, applicant shall provide a site plan showing all existing utilities, structures, easements and trees. Applicant shall also include a “Load Survey” form showing all current and proposed electric loads. A new customer with a load of 500KVA or greater or 100 residential units will have to fill out a “Service Investigation Form” and submit this form to the Electric Planning Department for review by the Electric Planning Engineer. Silicon Valley Power will do exact design of required substructures after plans are submitted for building permits.

SVP8. The Developer shall provide and install electric facilities per Santa Clara City Code chapter 17.15.210.

SVP9. Electric service shall be underground. See Electric Department Rules and Regulations for available services.

SVP10. Installation of underground facilities shall be in accordance with City of Santa Clara Electric Department standard UG-1000, latest version, and Santa Clara City Code chapter 17.15.050.

SVP11. Underground service entrance conduits and conductors shall be “privately” owned, maintained, and installed per City Building Inspection Division Codes. Electric meters and main disconnects shall be installed per Silicon Valley Power Standard MS- G7, Rev. 2.

SVP12. The developer shall grant to the City, without cost, all easements and/or right of way necessary for serving the property of the developer and for the installation of utilities (Santa Clara City Code chapter 17.15.110).

SVP13. If the “legal description” (not “marketing description”) of the units is condominium or apartment, then all electric meters and services disconnects shall be grouped at one location, outside of the building or in a utility room accessible directly from the outside. If they are townhomes or single-family residences, then each unit shall have it’s own meter, located on the structure. A double hasp locking arrangement shall be provided on the main switchboard door(s). Utility room door(s) shall have a double hasp locking arrangement or a lock box shall be provided. Utility room door(s) shall not be alarmed.

SVP14. If transformer pads are required, City Electric Department requires an area of 17’ x 16’-2”, which is clear of all utilities, trees, walls, etc. This area includes a 5’-0” area away from the actual transformer pad. This area in front of the transformer may be reduced from a 8’-0” apron to a 3’-0”, providing the apron is back of a 5’-0” min. wide sidewalk. Transformer pad must be a minimum of 10’-0 from all doors and windows, and shall be located next to a level, drivable area that will support a large crane or truck.

SVP15. All trees, existing and proposed, shall be a minimum of five (5) feet from any existing or proposed Electric Department facilities. Existing trees in conflict will have to be removed. Trees shall not be planted in PUE’s or electric easements.

SVP16. Any relocation of existing electric facilities shall be at Developer’s expense.

SVP17. Electric Load Increase fees may be applicable.

SVP18. The developer shall provide the City, in accordance with current City standards and specifications, all trenching, backfill, resurfacing, landscaping, conduit, junction boxes, vaults, street light foundations, equipment pads and subsurface housings required for power distribution, street lighting, and signal communication systems, as required by the City in the development of frontage and on-site property. Upon completion of improvements satisfactory to the City, the City shall accept the work.

Developer shall further install at his cost the service facilities, consisting of service wires, cables, conductors, and associated equipment necessary to connect a customer to the electrical supply system of and by the City. After completion of the facilities installed by developer, the City shall furnish and install all cable, switches, street lighting poles, luminaries, transformers, meters, and other equipment that it deems necessary for the betterment of the system (Santa Clara City Code chapter 17.15.210 (2)).

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 8 of 17 SVP19. Electrical improvements (including underground electrical conduits along frontage of properties) may be required if any single non-residential private improvement valued at $200,000 or more or any series of non-residential private improvements made within a three-year period valued at $200,000 or more (Santa Clara City Code Title 17 Appendix A (Table III)).

SVP20. Non-Utility Generator equipment shall not operate in parallel with the electric utility, unless approved and reviewed by the Electric Engineering Division. All switching operations shall be “Open-Transition-Mode”, unless specifically authorized by SVP Electric Engineering Division. A Generating Facility Interconnection Application must be submitted with building permit plans. Review process may take several months depending on size and type of generator. No interconnection of a generation facility with SVP is allowed without written authorization from SVP Electric Engineering Division.

SVP21. Encroachment permits will not be signed off by Silicon Valley Power until Developers Work substructure construction drawing has been completed.

SVP22. All SVP-owned equipment is to be covered by an Underground Electric Easement (U.G.E.E.) This is different than a PUE. Only publically-owned dry utilities can be in a UGEE. Other facilities can be in a joint trench configuration with SVP, separated by a 1’ clearance, providing that they are constructed simultaneously with SVP facilities.

See UG 1000 for details.

SVP23. Proper clearance must be maintained from all SVP facilities, including a 5’ clearance from the outer wall of all conduits. This is in addition to any UGEE specified for the facilities. Contact SVP before making assumptions on any clearances for electric facilities.

SVP24. Transformers and Switch devices can only be located outdoors. These devices MAY be placed 5’ from an outside building wall, provided that the building wall in that area meets specific requirements. (See UG 1000 document for specifics) EXAMPLE: If there are any doors, windows, vents, overhangs or other wall openings within 5’ of the transformer, on either side, then the transformer MUST be 10’ or more away from the building. These clearances are to be assumed to be clear horizontally 5’ in either direction and vertically to the sky.

SVP25. All existing SVP facilities, onsite or offsite, are to remain unless specifically addressed by SVP personnel by separate document. It is the Developers responsibility to maintain all clearances from equipment and easements. Developer to contact SVP outside of the PCC process for clear definitions of these clearance requirements.

Developer should not assume that SVP will be removing any existing facilities without detailed design drawings from SVP indicating potential removals. Simply indicating that SVP facilities are to be removed or relocated on conceptual plans does not imply that this action has been approved by SVP.

SVP26. SVP does not utilize any sub-surface (below grade) devices in its system. This includes transformers, switches, etc.

SVP27. All interior meter rooms at ground level are to have direct, outside access through only ONE door. Interior electric rooms must be enclosed in a dedicated electric room and cannot be in an open warehouse or office space.

SVP28. High Rise Metering and Multi-Floor Infrastructure Requirements a. Refer to: UG0250
SVP29. In the case of podium-style construction, all SVP facilities and conduit systems must be located on solid ground (aka “real dirt”), and cannot be supported on parking garage ceilings or placed on top of structures.

SVP30. Applicant is advised to contact SVP (CSC Electric Department) to obtain specific design and utility requirements that are required for building permit review/approval submittal. Please provide a site plan to Leonard Buttitta at 408-615-6620 to facilitate plan review.

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 9 of 17 WATER
W1. Potable Water Main: The applicant has submitted a Development Impact Analysis (DIA) to analyze the development’s impact on the potable water system using the City’s hydraulic model and it is currently under review. Subject to the findings of this analysis, the developer may be required to upgrade the potable water system as determined and approved by the City. The required potable water system upgrades will be at t he developer's expense. The size and limit of the upgrade shall be subject to the findings of the hydraulic modeling study, the condition of the existing water mains and the number of new connections proposed on the existing water mains.

W2. Fire Water Redundancy: The project shall provide a secondary fire water service for the residential building connecting to the pub lic potable water system on Buckingham Drive for the residential land use.

W3. Recycled Water Ready: All onsite plumbing for non -domestic water uses (e.g. irrigation) shall be designed for recycled water use and shall comply with all Recycled Water regulations.

W4. Encroachment Permit: Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit an encroachment permit application and design plans for construction of water utilities that comply with the latest edition of the Wate r & Sewer Utilities Water Service and Use Rules and R egulations, Water System Notes, and Water Standard Details and Specifications. In addition, prior to the City's issuance of Occupancy, the applicant shall construct all public water utilities per the ap proved plans. The Water & Sewer Utilities will inspect all public water utility installations and all other improvements encroaching public water utilities.

W5. Utility Design Plans: Utility Design Plans shall indicate the pipe material and the size of existing water, recycled water and sewer main(s). The pla ns shall show the nearest existing fire hydrant and the two nearest existing water main line gate valves near the project area. The plans shall show meter and backflow configurations to scale and per City of Santa Clara Water & Sewer Utilities Standard Det ails. Note that all new water meters and backflow prevention devices shall be located behind the sidewalk in a landscape area. Fire hydrants should be located two feet behind monolithic sidewalk if sidewalk is present; two feet behind face of curb if no si dewalk is present, per City Std Detail 18. The plans shall provide the profile section details for utilities crossing water, sewer, or recycled water mains to ensure a 12” minimum vertical clearance is maintained.

W6. Utility Separations: Applicant shall adhe re to and provide a note indicating that all horizontal and vertical clearances comply with State and local regulations. The applicant shall maintain a minimum 12” of vertical clearance at water service crossing with other utilities, and all required minim um horizontal clearances from water services: 10' from sanitary sewer utilities, 10’ from recycled water utilities, 8' from storm drain utilities, 5' from fire and other water utilities, 3' from abandone d water services, 5' from gas and electric utilities, and 5’ from the edge of the propose or existing driveway. For sanitary sewer, water, and recycled water utilities, the applicant shall maintain a minimum horizontal clearance of 10' from existing and proposed trees. If applicant installs tree root barriers, clearance from tree reduces to 5' (clearance must be from the edge of tree root barrier to edge of water facilities). No structures (fencing, foundation, biofiltration swales, etc.) allowed over sanit ary sewer, potable water and/or recycled water utilit ies and easements.

W7. Separate Services: Applicant shall submit plans showing proposed water, recycled water, sanitary sewer, and fire services connected to a public main in the public right -of- way to the satisfaction of the Director of Water & Sewer Utilities. Different types of water and recycled water use (domestic, irrigation, fire) shall be served by separate water services, each separately tapped at the water main. Tapping on existing fire service

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 10 of 17 line(s) is prohibited. Approved backflow prevention devi ce(s) are required on all potable water services.

W8. City Standard Meters and Backflows: All proposed meters and backflows for all water services shall meet the current City of Santa Clara Water & Sewer Ut ilities Standard Details. Plans shall show meter and backflow configurations to scale.

W9. Existing Services: The applicant must indicate the disposition of all existing water and sewer services and mains on the plans. If the existing services will not be used, then the applicant shall properly abandon these services to the main per Water & Sewer Utilities standards and install a new service to accommodate the water needs of the project. The applicant shall bear the cost of any relocation or abandonment of e xisting Water Department facilities required for project construction to the satisfaction of the Director of Water and Sewer Utilities.

W10. Fats, Oil and Grease (FOG): All food service land uses conducting commercial cooking operations including dishwashing a ctivities and equipment cleaning that generate grease-laden wastewater are subject to review from the Water and Sewer Utilities Department, for FOG Control and grease interceptor installation requirements. All food service projects are required to have an approved stamp from the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health before plans can be accepted for review. Contact Compliance Division of the Water and Sewer Utilities at (408) 615 -2002 for a Food Service Checklist to initiate the process. It ems to address: future maintenance agreements, identi fication of proposed plumbing and equipment, calculation for proposed grease control devise(s), identification of proposed grease control device(s), and waste/recycling/tallow storage.

W11. On-Site Storm Drain Treatment: Prior to issuance of Building Permit, th e applicant shall submit plans showing any onsite storm water treatment system. The plan shall include a section detail of the treatment system. No water, sewer, or recycled water facilities shall be located within 5-feet of any storm water treatment system.

W12. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall provide documentation of water usage so the Water Division can verify the appropriate size of all proposed water meters. Please note tha t if the existing water services are incapable of sup plying the water needs to the site, the existing services shall be abandoned and new separate dedicated water services shall be provided for each use (domestic and irrigation).

W13. Prior to issuance of Buil ding Permits, the applicant shall submit plan details for all water features (including but not limited to fountains and ponds) designed to include provisions for operating the system without City potable water supply and capable of being physically disconnected from source of potable water supply during Cit y declared water conservation periods, to the satisfaction of the Director of the Water & Sewer Utilities.

Decorative water features may be permanently connected to the City’s recycled water supply.

W14. Prior to City’s issuance of Building or Grading Permits , the applicant shall provide a dedicated water utility easement around the backflow prevention device onsite. The water utility easement for the water services and all other public water appurtenances shall be a minimum 15 feet wide and be adjacent to the public right -of-way without overlapping any public utility easement. Additionally, the applicant shall submit plans defining existing easements so Water Division can verify if there are any conflicts wi th proposed easements and water utilities.

W15. Underground Fire Permit: Prior to issuance of Building Permits, applicant shall submit an underground fire permit unless otherwise waived by the Fire Department. If fire flow information is needed, applicant sha ll coordinate with Water and Sewer Utilities Department, for fire flow information at (408)615-2000. A dedicated fire service line, with an approved backflow prevention device, shall be used for on -site fire hydrants. Fire service lines required for commer cial and industrial use shall be sized appropriately per fire flow demand and code requirements.

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 11 of 17 W16. Record Drawings: Upon completion of construction and prior to the City’s issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall provide "as -built" drawin gs of the public water utility infrastructure prepared by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the Director of Water & Sewer Utilities Department.

W17. Water Shortage Response Actions: Pursuant to the City of Santa Clara’s Urban Water Management Plan, during times of drought or water shortage, the City implements water shortage response actions in accordance with the level of water shortage declared. All construction activities and all new irrigation connections are subject to the Water Shortage Response Actions in effect at the time of construction and connection of the irrigation service.

W18. Water Shortage Response Actions for Stage 2 and higher include water use restrictions that limit the use of potable water such as:
 prohibiting the installati on of new potable water irrigation services. new irri gation connections, construction, and dust control.
 restrict the use of potable water used for construction and dust control if recycled water is available.

W19. This project is subject to all the requirem ents and restrictions of the Water Shortage Response Actions in place or adopted during the duration of the project. For more information, visit the City of Santa Clara Water & Sewer Utilities website at www.santaclaraca.gov/waterconservation.

POLICE
PD1. The Developer shall provid e a minimum average illumination of one -foot candle in carport, parking areas and in all common pedestrian or landscaped areas of the development, subject to adjustments by the Police Chief in consultation with Silicon Valley Power an d Planning Department as necessary for the project to meet LEED Certification, or equivalent, objectives. The illumination should be deployed in fixtures that are both weather and vandal resistant.

PD2. Address numbers of the indivi dual units shall be clearly v isible from the street and shall be a minimum of six (6) inches in height and of a color contrasting with the background material. Numbers shall be illuminated during the hours of darkness. Individual apartment numbers shall be a minimum of six (6) inches in height and a color contrasting to the background material and either visible from the street or from the center area of the project. Where multiple units/buildings occupy the same property, unit/building address shall be clearly visible.

PD3. There shall be positioned near the entrance an illustrative diagram of the complex, which shows the location of the viewer and unit designations within the complex, including separate building designations. This diagram shall be illuminated a nd should be protected by vandal and weather resistant covers.

PD4. The Developer shall meet the City’s guidelines established for radio signal penetration, detailed in the Santa Clara Police Department’s Public Safety Radio System Building Penetration Guidelines. The intended use of tele communications sites s hall be clearly and accurately stated in the project description. The signal, of whatever nature, of any communications facility or system, shall in no way whatsoever interfere with or affect any Police communication or Police communication system.

PD5. Public Safety Radio Systems Penetration Guidelines have been established by the city of Santa Clara Communications Department for radio signal penetration during emergencies. The developer is advised that the pro ject may be required to insta ll equipment for adequ ate radio coverage for the City Of Santa Clara Radio communications System, including but not limited to Police & Fire emergency services.

The developer should contact the director of communications at (40 8) 615 -5571. (for high rises)

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 12 of 17 PD6. When in the opinion of the fire code official, a new structure obstructs the line of sight of emergency radio communications to existing buildings or to any other locations, the developer of the structure shall provide and ins tall the radio retransmission equipment necessary to restore communications capabilities. The equipment shall be located in an approved space or area within the new structure.

PD7. The Developer shall provide enclosure fencing (trash area, utility equipment, et c.) that is either see-through or that has a six (6 ) inch opening along the bottom for clear visibility.

Any gates or access doors to these enclosures should be locked.

PD8. The Owner/Developer shall ensure that exterior elevators are see -through for maximum visibility. The Owner/Develop er shall ensure that a ll elevators are well lit and equipped with a security mirror to provide interior and exterior visibility prior to entry or exit.

PD9. Convex mirrors should be installed in elevator cabs and at stairwell landings.

PD10. In a development where th ere is an alley, drive way, etc. providing a rear entrance or access, the Developer shall ensure that addresses are displayed to both the front and rear of the individual buildings. Where an alley, driveway, etc. provides vehicular access, address numbers shall be clearly visible from that access.

PD11. Parking structures, including ramps, corners and entrances, should be illuminated at a minimum of an average of 5 -foot candles at all hours by the Developer, subject to adjustments by t he Police Chief in consultati on with Silicon Valley Power and Planning Department as necessary for the project to meet LEED Certification, or equivalent, objectives.

PD12. The Developer should equip the parking structure/site with an emergency panic alarm system that reports to a central of fice and/or 9-1-1. If more than one button is installed, they should be placed no more than 100 ft. apart.

PD13. All entrances to parking areas (surface, structure, sub -terranean, etc.) should be posted with appropriate signage to di scourage trespassing, unautho rized parking, etc. (S ee California Vehicle Code Section 22658(a) for guidance).

PD14. The developer should install skate stoppers on any low clearance wall of 36 inches in height or lower to prevent vandalism to the wall.

PD15. If the dev elopment includes any benches , these benches should not be longer in five feet in length and have arm rests at both ends. If the benches are longer than five feet in length, there should be a divider (arm rest or similar) in the middle of the bench in addition to the arm rests on both ends.

PD16. Garage, gate and other critical access points shall provide keypad access with assigned passcodes for the Police Department.

PD17. When there is an alley or driveway to the rear of the business or commercial establishment that provides pedestrian or vehic le access, that area s hould be fenced and locked after hours. A ‘Knox Box’ or key coded system shall be used for police and fire emergency access.

PD18. The property should be fenced off during demolition and construction as a safety barrier to the public and deterrent to theft and other crime.

PD19. Each distinct unit within the building shall have its address displayed on or directly above both front and rear doors, to the satisfaction of Chief of Police.

PD20. Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize visibility from the street while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along the fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows.

PD21. All construction of dwelling uni ts shall conform to the requi rements of the Uniform Building Security Code as adopted by the City of Santa Clara City Council.

PD22. Exterior stairs shall be open style whenever structurally possible, and should be well lit.

PD23. Other line of sight obstructions (inc luding recessed doorways, alc oves, etc.) should be avoided on building exterior walls and interior hallways.

PD24. All exterior doors should be adequately illuminated at all hours with their own light source.

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 13 of 17 PD25. The parking structure/site should be equipped with ce ntrally located emergency telephones.

PD26. “White” light source should be utilized. There should be no “dark” areas inside the structure.

PD27. The interior of the parking structure should be painted a light, highly reflective color.

FIRE
F1. Prior to Building Permit Issuance, an alternative materials, design, and methods of construction and equipment application will need to be submitted for review and approval incorporating the following mitigation measures:
a. The maximum fire-flow reduction allowance for the project will be fifty-percent. b. The new building will be provided with an emergency voice evacuation system in accordance with CFC, Section 907.5.2.2; and
c. The required building stairs to the roof will be provided with stair penthouses that provide direct access to the roof in accordance with CBC, Section 1011.12.2 (exception does not apply).

F2. Prior to Demolition Permit Issuance, a Hazardous Materials Closure (HMCP) is required for the existing building(s) if hazardous materials were used, handled, or stored. While required prior to closing a business this is not always done by the business owner, and therefore should be part of the developer’s due diligence. The hazardous materials closure plans demonstrate that hazardous materials which were stored, dispensed, handled, or used in the facility/business are safely transported, disposed of, or reused in a manner that eliminates any threat to public health and the environment.

F3. Prior to Demo Permit Issuance, a Phase II environmental assessment is required to be submitted for review and approval. If hazards are present that require site mitigation, cleanup or management of chemical contaminants in soil, soil vapor, or groundwater a separate permit from one of the regulatory agencies below will be required. The type and extent of contamination on site(s) will govern which of the regulatory agencies noted below can supervise the cleanup:
a. Santa Clara Fire Department, Community Risk Reduction Division, CUPA b. Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
c. State Water Resources Control Board
d. Santa Clara County, Department of Environmental Health.

F4. Prior to issuance of the Demolition Permit Issuance, a permit for the written Fire Protection Plan shall be submitted for review and approval in compliance with the fire department Construction Safety and Demolition standard.

F5. Prior to Building Permit Issuance, provide documentation from the City of Santa Clara Water & Sewer Department that the minimum required in accordance with Appendix B can be met based on the final square footage. Based on the fire flow fire hydrants shall be provided in accordance with Appendix C spaced around the perimeter of the building.

The AM&M will mitigate fire hydrant spacing requirements.

F6. A five-foot all-weather perimeter pathway around the entire perimeter of the building to facilitate access to emergency responder access is required.

F7. Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, a construction permit for the fire department apparatus access roads are required submitted for review and approval. Roadways must be provided to comply with all the following requirements:
a. Fire apparatus access roadways shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved when any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building.
b. Fire apparatus access roadways shall have a “minimum” width of a fire apparatus access roadway for Engines is 20 feet. The “minimum” width of roadways for

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 14 of 17 aerial apparatus is 26 feet. Ariel access roadways shall be located a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the protected building and the sides of the building requiring access shall be approved by the Fire Department. Trees, overhead wiring, etc. shall not conflict with any means of fire department access. c. Fire access roadways shall have a “minimum” unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. Aerial apparatus access roads may require additional vertical clearance.
d. Fire access roadways shall All fire department access roadways shall be an all- weather surface designed to support the imposed load of fire apparatus with a gross vehicle weight of 75,000-pounds.
e. Fire apparatus access roadways shall have a “minimum” inside turning radius for fire department access roadways shall be 36 feet or greater. f. Dead-end fire apparatus access roadways in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for turning around.
g. Traffic calming devices are not permitted on any designated fire access roadway, unless approved by the Fire Prevention & Hazardous Materials Division. h. All Fire Department Access roadways shall be recorded as an Emergency Vehicle Access Easement (EVAE) on the final map. No other instruments will be considered as substitutions such as P.U.E, Ingress/Egress easements and/or City Right-of-Ways.
i. All gates installed on designated fire department access roads are required to electrically automatic powered gates. Gates shall be provided with an emergency battery power supply, or shall be a fail-safe design, allowing the gate to be pushed open without the use of special knowledge or equipment. To control the automatic gates a detector/strobe switch shall be installed to allow emergency vehicles (e.g., fire, police, ems) to flash a vehicle mounted strobe light towards the detector/strobe switch, which in turn overrides the system and opens the gate. The gates shall be equipped with a TOMAR Strobe Switch or 3M OPTICOM Detector to facilitate this override. Said device shall be mounted at a minimum height of seven feet (7’) above the adjacent road surface and is subject to an acceptance test witnessed by the Fire Department prior to final approval of the project.

F8. Prior to Building Permit Issuance, provisions shall be made for installation of the Emergency Responder Radio Coverage System (ERRCS) equipment, including but not limited to pathway survivability in accordance with the fire departments Emergency Responder Radio Coverage System Standard.

F9. Prior to the start of construction, roadways and water supplies for fire protection are required to be installed, made serviceable, and maintained throughout the course of the project.

F10. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy Issuance (temporary or permanent), fire-life safety systems installations must be fully completed, functional, and approved.

STREETS
ST1. Submit copy of complete landscape plans for review and comment by City staff. Plans are to include all existing trees with 4” or larger diameter (measured 30” above grou nd) on development property and adjacent property if they may be impacted. Trees are to be correctly labeled with specie name and correctly plotted as to e xact location on the plans. Trees are to be noted as to whether they are proposed to be saved or re moved.

City of Santa Clara Tree Preservation/City Arborist specifications are to be included on all plans where existing trees are to be saved during construction.

ST2. The Developer is to supply and install City street trees per City specifications; spacing , specie, and size (24-inch box minimum) to be approved by City Arborist.

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 15 of 17 ST3. No cutting of any part of private trees, including roots, shall be done without se curing prior approval of the City Arborist. Tree trimming/removal shall be done in accordance to the City of Santa Clara Tree Preservation/City Arborist specifications and with direct supervision of a certified arborist (Certification of International Society of Arboriculture).

ST4. Identified existing mature trees to be maintained. Prepare a tree protection plans for review and approval by the City of Santa Clara prior to any demolition, grading or other earthwork in the vicinity of existing trees on the site.

ST5. Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize visibility from the street while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows.

ST6. All existing and proposed trees shall maintain a minimum of ten (10) feet from any existing or prop osed underground utility infrastructure or facilities. Existing trees that conflict must be removed by the developer. Trees shall not be planted in public utility easements unless prior approval is obtained from corresponding department.

ST7. Include City of Santa Clara Tree Preservation/Cit y Arborist specifications on all improvement plans.

ST8. No cutting of any part of private trees, including roots, shall be done without securing prior approval of the City Arborist. Tree trimming/removal shall be done in accordance to the C ity of Santa Clara Tree Preservation/City Arborist specifications and with direct supervision of a certified arborist (Certification of International Society of Arboriculture).

ST9. Identified existing mature trees to be maintained. Prepare a tre e protection plans for review and approval by the City of Santa Clara prior to any demolition, grading or other earthwork in the vicinity of existing trees on the site.

ST10. Prior to City’s issuance of Building or Grading Permits, the applicant shall develop a Final Stormwater Management Plan, update the C.3 Data Form , the Special Project Narratives and Worksheet (as appropriate), and an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan.

ST11. During Building Permit application, Final Stormwater Management Plan shall incorporate outstanding items as identified in the Schaaf & Wheeler ’s 3rd party review letter (dated September 21, 2021) pertaining to TTS elevations, location of perforated pipes, and drainage bubbler rim elevations.

ST12. Update Utility Plans to show T1 and T2 connections to storm drain syst em and drainage bubbler locations.

ST13. The Final Stormwater Management Plan and all ass ociated calculations shall be reviewed and certified by a qualified 3 rd party consultant from the SCVURPPP List of Qualified Consultants, and a final 3rd party review letter shall be submitted with the Plan.

ST14. Provide a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) with the State Water Resources Control Board for coverage under the State Construction General Permit (Order No. 2009-0009- DWQ) prior to issuance of any building permit for grading or construction. Active projects covered under the Construction General Permit will be inspected by the City once per month during the wet season (October – April).

ST15. Include the SCVURPPP Countywide Construction BMPs Plan Sheet into the construction plans.

ST16. Include the C.3 Treatment Facilities Construction Notes into the construction pl ans and/or Stormwater Control Plans.

ST17. During the construction phase, all stormwater control measures shall be inspected for conformance to approved plans by a qualified 3 rd party consultant from the SCVURPPP List of Qualified Consultants , and a 3 rd party concurrence letter on the C.3 facilities construction shall be submitted to the Public Works Department. As -Built drawing shall be submitted to the Public Works Department.

ST18. Stormwater treatment facilities must be designed, installed, and maintained to achieve the site design measures throughout their life in accordance to the SCVRUP PP C.3 Stormwater Handbook. They shall be installed using biotreatment soil media that meet the minimum specifications as set forth in this Handbook. If percolation rate tes t of the

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 16 of 17 biotreatment soil mix is not performed on -site, a certification letter fro m the supplier verifying that the soil meets the specified mix.

ST19. Prepare an Operations and Maintenance plan (or checklist) for the stormwater treatment facilities.

ST20. The property owner shall enter into an Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement with the Ci ty for all installed stormwater treatment measures in perpetuity. Applicants should contact Karin H ickey at (408) 615 -3097 or [email protected] for assistance completing the Agreement. For more infor mation and to download the most recent version of the O&M Agreement, visit the City’s stormwater re sources website at http://santaclaraca.gov/cd.

ST21. Any site design measures used to reduce the size of stormwater tre atment measures shall not be installed for the project without the written approval from the City, installing the corresponding resizing of other stormwater treatment measures and an amendment of the property’s O&M Agreement.

ST22. Developer shall install an app ropriate stormwater pollution prevention message such as “No Dumping – Flows to Bay” on any storm drains located on private property.

ST23. Interior floor drains shall be plumbed to the sanitary sewer system and not connected to the City’s storm drain system.

ST24. Floor drains within trash enclosures shall be plumbed to the sanitary sewer system and not connected to the City’s storm drain system.

ST25. Decorative and recreational water features such as fountains, pools, and ponds shall be designed and constructed to drain to the sanitary sewer system only.

SW1. The applicant shall complete an updated Post-Construction Solid Waste Generation Estimation and Collection Form, which includes the estimation of trash and recycling materials generated from the project by use type. Use the City’s Solid Waste Guidelines for New and Redevelopment Projects as specified by the development type. Contact the Public Works Department at [email protected] or (408) 615-3080 for more information.

SW2. The applicant shall provide a site plan showing all proposed locations of solid waste containers, chutes, compactors, trash enclosures and trash staging areas. The site plan shall show the route or access for trash and recycling collectors (trucks) including vertical clearance, turning radius and street/alley widths. All plans shall comply with the City’s Solid Waste Guidelines.

SW3. For projects that involve construction, demolition or renovation of 5,000 square feet or more, the applicant shall comply with City Code Section 8.25.285 and recycle or divert at least sixty five percent (65%) of materials generated for discard by the project during demolition and construction activities. No building, demolition, or site development permit shall be issued unless and until applicant has submitted a construction and demolition debris materials check-off list. Applicant shall create a Waste Management Plan and submit, for approval, a Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Report through the City’s online tracking tool at http://santaclara.wastetracking.com/.

SW4. Prior to obtaining a Temporary or Final Certificate of Occupancy, individual weight tickets for all materials generated for discard or reuse by the project during demolition and construction activities shall be uploaded to Green Halo and submitted for review and approval by Environmental Services. At a minimum two (2) weeks review time is required.

SW5. This project is subject to the City’s Accumulation, Transportation and Disposal of Solid Waste Ordinance (Chapter 8.25 of the Municipal Codes), which requires the handling and disposal of waste by authorized service haulers. Insert the General Notes for the Construction & Demolition (C&D) Waste Management into construction plans in accordance with the City’s municipal codes prior to the issuance of a Building or Grading permit. Provide the Green Halo waste online tracking number to Building staff prior to the issuance of a demolition or building permit.

3194 Stevens Creek Blvd – The Meridian PLN1-15213 Conditions of Approval Page 17 of 17 SW6. This project falls within the City’s exclusive franchise hauling area. Applicant is required to use the City’s exclusive franchise hauler and rate structure for solid waste services.

Prior to the issuance of a Public Works clearance, the project applicant shall complete and sign the Acknowledgement portion of the Solid Waste Management Plan for New Development and Redevelopment form.

SW7. Building must have enclosures for garbage, recycling waste containers (food scrap only collection is voluntary- if utilized space must be allocated for these containers). The size and shape of the enclosure(s) must be adequate to serve the estimated needs and size of the building(s) onsite and should be designed and located on the property to allow ease of access by collection vehicles. Roofed enclosures with masonry walls and solid metal gates are the preferred design. Any required enclosure fencing (trash area, utility equipment, etc.) if not see-thru, shall have a six (6) inch opening along the bottom for clear visibility. Any gates or access doors to these enclosures shall be locked outside of normal business hours.

SW8. All refuse from all residential properties within the city shall be collected at least once a week, unless otherwise approved in writing (SCCC 8.25.120). Garbage service level required for residential developments (single-family and multi-family) shall be no less than twenty (20) gallons per unit. All project shall submit to the Public Works Department the preliminary refuse service level assessment for approval.

PARKS AND RECREATION
PR1. This memo assumes the Project is not a subdivision and the Mitigation Fee Act (MFA) provisions will apply. The project will generate an estimated 142 residents (2.4 persons/household x 59 units). Based on the MFA standard of 2.6 acres/1000 residents, the amount of public parkland required for this Project to mitigate the impact of the new resident demand is approximately 0.3682-acres and the equivalent fee due in lieu of parkland dedication is $2,327,786. Housing developments for which 100% of the units are affordable to low and/or moderate income households are eligible for an additional 15% credit toward the parkland dedication requirement or fees in lieu thereof; provided that the approving authority finds that (1) the development complies with all other provisions of this section and that (2) providing the additional credit would serve the public interest. The fee due in lieu of parkland dedication with a 15% credit is $1,978,618. Final calculations will depend upon the actual number and type of units and the mix of parkland dedicated and remaining fee due, at the discretion of the City.

PR2. In lieu fees imposed under Chapter 17.35 shall be due and payable to the City prior to issuance of a building permit for each dwelling unit. Please provide documentation in writing to this Department if both a. and b. apply to this project:
a. The project is developed by a nonprofit housing developer. b. At least 49% of the units are reserved for occupancy by lower-income households at an affordable rent. Lower income in this context means ≤ 80% AMI, so moderate-income developments would not qualify.

PR3. Dwelling Unit Tax. A dwelling unit tax (DUT) is also due based on the number of units and additional bedrooms per City Code Chapter 3.15. The Project mix includes 0 studio units, 10 one-bedroom units, 20 two-bedroom units, 24 three-bedroom units and 5 four- bedroom units for a total DUT of $1,300.

PR4. Calculations may change if the number of units change, if any areas do not conform to the Ordinance and City Code Chapter 17.35, and/or if the fee schedule for new residential development fees due in lieu of parkland dedication changes before this Project is deemed complete by Planning.

3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
A1.1

TITLE SHEET
ARCHITECTURAL:

A1.1 TITLE SHEET
A1.2 FIRE ACCESS DIAGRAM
A1.3 TRASH DIAGRAMS
A2.1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A2.2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A2.3 THIRD FLOOR PLAN
A2.4 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN
A2.5 FIFTH FLOOR PLAN
A2.6 SIXTH FLOOR PLAN
A2.7 ROOF PLAN
A2.8 TYPICAL UNIT PLANS - 1BD
A2.9 TYPICAL UNIT PLANS - 2BD
A2.10 TYPICAL UNIT PLANS - 3BD + 4BD
A3.1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.2 BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.3 BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.4 BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.5 BUILDING SECTIONS
A3.6 BUILDING SECTIONS
A3.7 BUILDING SECTIONS
A4.1 BUILDING PERSPECTIVE
A4.2 COLORS + MATERIALS
A4.3 CODE COMPLIANCE - ALLOWABLE

AREA CALCULATIONS
SHEET INDEX:

DEVELOPER:

CRP Aﬀordable Housing & Community Development
455 Morena Blvd. Suite #107
San Diego, CA 92117
Tel: (619) 487-4790
Contact: Steven Blanden
sblanden@crpaﬀorable.com
ARCHITECT:

Dahlin Group
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Tel: (925) 251-7200
Contact: Lauri Moﬀet-Fehlberg
[email protected]
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
vanderToolen Associates
855 Bordeaux Way, Suite 240
Napa, CA 94588
Tel: (707) 224-2299
Contact: Mary Carden
[email protected]
CIVIL ENGINEER:

BKF Engineers
4670 Willow Road, Suite 250
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Tel: (925) 396-7700
Contact: Brock Roby
[email protected]
PROJECT TEAM:

THE MERIDIAN THIRD PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY:

PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
PROJECT NAME:

LOCATION:

PROJECT NUMBER:

CLIENT:

APN:

GP DESIGNATION:

ZONING/DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

HEIGHT:

CONSTRUCTION TYPE:

OCCUPANCY TYPE:

ACREAGE: Acres

0.58 TOTAL: 0.58
Percentage
BUILDING COVERAGE: 72%
TOTAL:

RESIDENTIAL:

COMMON / AMENITY:

CIRCULATION:

UTILITY:

COMMERCIAL/OFFICE:

PARKING:

TOTAL:

GROUND LEVEL:

COMMON / AMENITY:

CIRCULATION:

UTILITY:

COMMERCIAL/OFFICE:

PARKING:

TOTAL:

PODIUM LEVEL:

RESIDENTIAL:

COMMON / AMENITY:

CIRCULATION:

UTILITY:

TOTAL:

PODIUM LEVEL:

OUTDOOR COURTYARD*
THIRD LEVEL:

RESIDENTIAL:

COMMON / AMENITY:

CIRCULATION:

UTILITY:

TOTAL:

FOURTH LEVEL:

RESIDENTIAL:

COMMON / AMENITY:

CIRCULATION:

UTILITY:

TOTAL:

FITH LEVEL:

RESIDENTIAL:

COMMON / AMENITY:

CIRCULATION:

UTILITY:

TOTAL:

SIXTH LEVEL:

RESIDENTIAL:

COMMON / AMENITY:

CIRCULATION:

UTILITY:

TOTAL:

UNIT MIX
UNIT 1A (531 GROSS SF):

UNIT 1B (587 GROSS SF):

UNIT 1C (608 GROSS SF):

UNIT 2A (800 GROSS SF):

UNIT 2B (821 GROSS SF):

UNIT 2C (842 GROSS SF):

UNIT 3A (1077 GROSS SF):

UNIT 3B (1100 GROSS SF):

UNIT 4A (1295 GROSS SF):

UNIT 4B (1315 GROSS SF):

TOTAL:

Ratio # of units Total
1-BD: 1 10 10
2-BD: 1.5 20 30
3-BD: 1.5 24 36
4-BD 1.5 5 8
TOTAL:

Ratio # of units Total
ALL UNITS: 0.5 59 30
TOTAL:

RESIDENTIAL STANDARD STALLS:

RESIDENTIAL COMPACT STALLS:

ACCESSIBLE STALLS:

TOTAL:

CLASS I - SECURED PARKING

CLASS II - SHORT TERM
TOTAL:

No maximum height per zoning section 18.22.250
2,630
2,630

BIKE PARKING PROVIDED (SPACES)

12.13.2021
14,068
11,114
484

GROSS BUILDING AREAS PER FLOOR (SF)
88,087
2,183
10,141
1,140
8 ± 36
± 28
2,
150
320
13,490
Square Feet
1 59

PARKING REQUIRED (SPACES) PER MUNICIPAL CODE FOR VHDMU
PARKING PROVIDED (SPACES) PERSUANT TO AB1763 - WITHIN 1/2 MILE OF A MAJOR TRANSIT STOP 84 4
11,114
32*
4 1
1 2
484
2,150
604
5 22
4,494
*NOT INCLUDED IN GROSS AREA TOTALS BY FLOOR OR BY BUILDING 10 9
320
320
14,068
1,572
484
11,114
PARKING REQUIRED (SPACES) PERSUANT TO AB1763 - WITHIN 1/2 MILE OF A MAJOR TRANSIT STOP 30 *ADDITIONAL 2 STALLS ABOVE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT WILL BE PROVIDED AS FEASIBLE. THEY ARE PROPOSED AT THE

OWNER'S DISCRETION AS BUILDING PERMIT DRAWINGS ARE DEVELOPED 11,114
26 3,857
3,469
11,939
484
2,150
320
18,325
781
1,734
1,585
11,595
14,068
3 3
R2
3941 Stevens Creek
Santa Clara, CA
1648.001
CRP Affordable

GROSS BUILDING AREA TOTALS (SF)

GROSS SITE AREAS (SF)
18,325
Square Feet
25,300

GENERAL
Very High Density Mixed Use
(5) Stories Type IIIA Over (1) Story IA
54,597
294-39-010
Community Mixed Use
18,325
25,300
14,068
11,595
NORTH
VICINITY MAP:

PROJECT LOCATION
The Meridian is a 59-unit aﬀordable housing development located at the corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Buckingham Drive in Santa Clara.

This large family housing development has a mix of one, two, three, and four- bedroom units wrapped around a central podium courtyard. The multi-purpose community room spills out onto the podium courtyard where play areas will be provided for residents consistent with CDLAC and TCAC requir ements.

The building is six stories, with ﬁve stories of residential units located over ground ﬂoor garage parking and residential amenity space. The ground ﬂoor is designed to have a strong storefront presence along Stevens Creek Boulevard. It will be activated by residential lobby, mail, oﬃce areas, and secured bike storage.

The project utilizes a density bonus and satisﬁes the Transit Adjacency requirement under AB1763 which allows for four concessions, and a height increase of 33’ or 3 stories, and no limit on density and discretionary waivers allowed by the city. Based on the current proposal, the project complies with the Very High Density Mixed Use (VHDMU) Regulations and seeks only one incentive, concession, or waiver as the city sees ﬁt to waive the commercial parking component for this aﬀordable project. The applicant reserves the right to apply the remaining concessions in the future if desired.

PROJECT NARRATIVE:

CIVIL:

C0.0 COVER SHEET
C1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
C2.0 CIVIL SITE PLAN
C3.0 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
C4.0 COMPOSITE UTILITY PLAN
C5.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
C5.1 STORMWATER DETAILS
LANDSCAPE:

L-0.0 COVER SHEET
L-1.1 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
L-2.1 TREE PLAN
L-3.1 CONSTRUCTION CALLOUT PLAN 1F
L-3.2 CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT PLAN 1F
L-3.3 CONSTRUCTION CALLOUT & LAYOUT
PLAN 2F
L-4.1 SHRUB PLAN
L-5.1 SHRUB IRRIGATION PLAN 1F
L-5.2 TREE IRRIGATION PLAN 1F
L-5.3 SHRUB & TREE IRRIGATION PLAN 2F
L-6.1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
L-6.2 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
L-7.1 PLANTING DETAILS
L-8.1 IRRIGATION DETAILS
L-8.2 IRRIGATION DETAILS
L-8.3 IRRIGATION DETAILS
Xref J:\1648 - CRP Affordable\001_Stevens Creek\File_In\Landscape\21_!218_Third Planning Dept Submittal and CAD\Xref\FloorPlan-EXPORT-MERIDIAN-2NDFLOOR-A.dwg van
evcs evcs
PL
PL
PL
PL
vanevcs
KB
KB

COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT
ble\001_Stevens Creek\File\001_Stevens Creek\CSttevens
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
NORTH
A1.2

FIRE & TRASH

ACCESS DIAGRAM

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
SCALE: 3/32” = 1’-0”

PROPERTY LINE

FIRE ACCESS ROUTE

TRASH ACCESS ROUTE

TRASH PICK-UP STOP

WATER SOURCE
150’-0” HOSE RADIUS

TRASH STAGING AREA

KNOX BOX
LEGEND:

EXISTING HYDRANT ON

ADJACENT PROPERTY

CAN USE ADJACENT PROPERTY

DRIVE AISLE TO ADDRESS GAP
150’-0” HYDRANT RADIUS

TRASH ACCESS
ROUTE
150’-0” HOSE PULL

DISTANCE
MPOE
ERRCS

EXISTING

HYDRANT

PROPSED STREET TREES TO NOT
EXCEED HEIGHT LIMIT OF 30’-0”

FOR FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS
22’-0” BUILDING SETBACK

FOR FIRE APPARATUS

NEW FREE-STANDING FDC LOCATION

FIRE PUMP
ROOM

TRASH ROOM
± 44’-0” HOSE GAP
20’-0” BUILDING SETBACK

FOR FIRE APPARATUS

ADJACENT PROPERTY DRIVE AISLE

NEW HYDRANT
5’ WALKING PATH FOR FIRE
ACCESS
5’ WALKING PATH FOR

FIRE ACCESS
KB
150’-0” HYDRANT RADIUS
: I
;. .... ,
.,,. : I
.
• I
I
• I
·., , ....
'' : ♦ ..... _ -- ~ .
. - - -
I
' ' ' ' ' ~
~
~
~
--♦- --------------=·
---
□
I
I
ci
I
I
I
/
I
/
/
/
/
/
I
I
I
I
I
, ,,
,,(
,,,, I
' ' '
rl'---------'
♦ -+
0 0
-D
-++------------~-------------------------~--------------- ♦ I I
DAHLIN
Xref ..\..\..\File_In\Landscape\21_!218_Third Planning Dept Submittal and CAD\Xref\FloorPlan-EXPORT-MERIDIAN-2NDFLOOR-A.dwg C
C

TRASH ROOM
SPARE
4-YARD

GARBAGE
SPARE
4-YARD

RECYCLING
COMPAC
G R
4-YARD

RECYCLING
4-YARD

GARBAGE
18_Third Prdir8__TTh
16'-
22'-2"222' 2"
CB
JAN.
24"
pantry
G CR

TRASH ROOM
16'-7 1/2"
10'-4"
6'-10"6'-' 6
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
NORTH
A1.3

TRASH DIAGRAMS
RESIDENTIAL:

NO LESS THAN 32 GALLONS/WEEK/UNIT ~ 32 GAL x 59 UNITS = 1,888 GAL/WEEK OR 9.34

CUBIC YARDS/WEEK
OFFICE/COMMERCIAL:
3 CUBIC YARDS REQIURED FOR LESS THAN 20,000 SQUARE FOOT SPACE TOTAL TRASH GENERATED = 12.32 CUBIC YARDS/WEEK
(2) 4-YARD BINS PROVIDED AT TRASH ROOM
TRASH PICK-UP WILL NEED TO BE (2) TIMES PER WEEK.

RESIDENTIAL:

PROVIDE 96-GALLON BINS FOR RESIDENT USE.

OFFICE/COMMERCIAL:

REQUIRED IF USE GENERATES OVER TWO (2) YARDS OF SOLID WASTE PER WEEK (GARBAGE AND RECYCLING)
(2) 96-GALLON BINS PROVIDED AT TRASH ROOM
ORGANICS PICK-UP CAN BE (1) TIME PER WEEK
RESIDENTIAL:

NO LESS THAN 64 GALLONS/WEEK/UNIT ~ 64 GAL x 59 UNITS = 3,776 GAL/WEEK OR 18.7

CUBIC YARDS/WEEK
OFFICE/COMMERCIAL:
(1) 96 GALLON CONTAINER FOR MIXED RECYCLING
(1) 96 GALLON TOTE AND (2) 4-YARD BINS PROVIDED AT TRASH ROOM RECYCLING PICK-UP WILL NEED TO BE (3) TIMES PER WEEK.

GARBAGE:

ORGANICS:

RECYCLING:

ENLARGED GROUND FLOOR TRASH ROOM
1 ENLARGED TRASH ROOMS ABOVE (FLOORS 2 TO 6)
2 SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”

TRASH STAGING AREA
LEGEND:
-
r - - - - 1
I I
I I
I I
L - - - - J r - - - - l
I I
I
___ j
00 =
E8
DAHLIN
XrefJ:\1648
-CRP
Affffof
rdable\0
\File_In\Landscape\21_!218_Third
Planning
DeptSubm
ittaland
CAD\Xref\fFloorPlan-EXPORT-M
ERIDIAN-2NDFLOOR-A.dwg
van
evcs evcs
C
C
26'-11 3/4" 18'-0" TYP.18'-0" TYP.
5'-0"55
7'-0""
PL
PL
PL
PL

COMMERCIAL
BIKE
ROOM

MECHANICAL
E.E.

LOBBY
ELEC.

TRASH ROOM

PARKING
(32 STALLS PROVIDED)
MR
+/- 2499 NET SF INSIDE OF WALL

BOMA STANDARDS WILL PUT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE
OVER THE REQUIRED 2530 SQ FT @ 1% FAR
199'-0"
25'-4"
3'-0"
25'-4"
3'-0"
25'-4"
3'-0"
25'-4"
3'-0"
25'-4" 11'-2" 6'-6" 12'-0" 6'-6"
30'-2 1/2"9'-4"27'-5"
3'-0"
12'-0"6'-6"
98'-9"
MAIL

FIRE PUMP
van
RR MM
24'-2"

FACE OF CURB

PROPERTY LINE
PUE
10'-3 1/2"
OFFICE
OFFICE

ERRCS MPOE
ES)ES)(± 28 BIK(± 222 KK
evcs
E.E.

SPARE
4-YARD

GARBAGE
SPARE
4-YARD

RECYCLING
9'-0"
TYP.
12'-0" 5'-6"-6
6'-0"-0 12'-0"9'-0"6'-4"4"
KB
KB

COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT
G R
8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0"
4-YARD

RECYCLING
4-YARD

GARBAGE
5555
00 ek\
5555
1_Ste
Cree
eevens
66 3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
A2.1
NORTH

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”
~
~
~
7 D--
~ ~ v
~
J ~
E8
DAHLIN
CB
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
18"
pantry
60"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
18"
c
ri
x
16"
HPWH
18"
pantry
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
15"
5 fr
8x
HPWH
HPWH
18"
pantrypypantrypantry
60"60"6060
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.59.

HPWH
18"
pantrypypantrypantry
60"60"6060
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.59.

IDF
JAN.

UNIT 3A UNIT 3A
UNIT 3B
UNIT 3B
MAINT.

UNIT 1C
UNIT 1A

COMMUNITY
ROOM
UNIT 2CUNIT 2C
UNIT 2A
UNIT 2B
STOR.
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24" 2
pantry p
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24" 2
pantry p
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
u
g
18"
pantry
60"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
18"
c
ri
x
16"
HPWH
UNIT 4B
55'-11 1/2" 87'-1 1/2" 55'-11 1/2"
199'-0"
25'-0" 6'-5" 24'-6 1/2" 25'-0"
5'-11 1/2"
25'-0"
55'-4" 9'-10" 26'-6 1/2"
91'-8 1/2"
6'-0" 9'-10 1/2" 37'-11 1/2" 11'-8" 43'-4" 11'-8" 73'-6" 5'-0" 199'-0"
88'-5 1/2" 10'-3 1/2"
98'-9"
G C

PROPERTY LINE
AWNING

FLEX ROOM
R.R.R.R.

TRASH ROOM
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
A2.2
NORTH

SECOND FLOOR
PLAN

ONE BEDROOM

TWO BEDROOM

THREE BEDROOM

FOUR BEDROOM

SECOND FLOOR UNIT MIX
2 UNITS
4 UNITS
4 UNITS
1 UNITS
TOTAL 11 UNITS
SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”
:---- -------------- ---
!
i
-------------- __________________________ L____________________ -------------- ' ------ ------------------------------------------- -- ____ _j E8
DAHLIN
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
18"
pantry
60"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
18"
c
ri
x2
16"
HPWH
18"
pantry
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
15"
5 fr
8x
HPWH
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
HPWH
18"
pantrypypantrypantry
60"60"
y
6060
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.59.

HPWH
18"
pantrypypantrypantry
60"60"
y
6060
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.59.

JAN.

UNIT 3A
UNIT 3A UNIT 3A
UNIT 3A
UNIT 3A
UNIT 4A
TEEN
ROOM
UNIT 1B
UNIT 1A
UNIT 2CUNIT 2C
UNIT 2A
UNIT 2A
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
u
g
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantry p
18"
pantry
60"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
18"
c
ri
x2
16"
HPWH
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24" 2
pantry p
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
IDF

LAUNDRY

DW D DW W
CBG CR

TRASH ROOM
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
A2.3
NORTH

THIRD FLOOR
PLAN
SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”

ONE BEDROOM

TWO BEDROOM

THREE BEDROOM

FOUR BEDROOM

THIRD FLOOR UNIT MIX
2 UNITS
4 UNITS
5 UNITS
1 UNITS
TOTAL 12 UNITS
,--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 '
\ \ -,,,, __
i i i i i
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __J DAHLIN
E8
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
18"
pantry
60"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
18"
c
ri
x2
16"
HPWH
18"
pantry
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
15"
5 fr
8x
HPWH
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
HPWH
18"
pantrypypantrypantry
60"60"
y
6060
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.59.

HPWH
18"
pantrypypantrypantry
60"60"
y
6060
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.59.

JAN.

UNIT 3A
UNIT 3A UNIT 3A
UNIT 3A
UNIT 3A
UNIT 4A
UNIT 1B
UNIT 1A
UNIT 2CUNIT 2C
UNIT 2A
UNIT 2A
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
u
g
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantry p
18"
pantry
60"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
18"
c
ri
x2
16"
HPWH
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24" 2
pantry p
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
FLEX
SPACE
IDF
FLEX
SPACE
CBG CR

TRASH ROOM
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
A2.4
NORTH

FOURTH FLOOR
PLAN
SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”

ONE BEDROOM

TWO BEDROOM

THREE BEDROOM

FOUR BEDROOM

FOURTH FLOOR UNIT MIX
2 UNITS
4 UNITS
5 UNITS
1 UNITS
TOTAL 12 UNITS
,--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 '
\ \ -,,,, __
i i i i i
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __J DAHLIN
E8
JAN.
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
18"
pantry
60"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
18"
c
ri
x2
16"
HPWH
18"
pantry
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
15"
5 fr
8x
HPWH
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
HPWH
18"
pantrypypantrypantry
60"60"
y
6060
15 cu ftf
refrig
28x29.59.

HPWH
18"
pantrypypantrypantry
60"60"
y
6060
15 cu ftf
refrig
28x29.59.

UNIT 3A
UNIT 3A UNIT 3A
UNIT 3A
UNIT 3A
UNIT 4A
UNIT 1B
UNIT 1A
UNIT 2CUNIT 2C
UNIT 2A
UNIT 2A
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
u
g
2 15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantry p
18"
pantry
60"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
18"
c
ri
x2
16"
HPWH
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24" 2
pantry p
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
FLEX
SPACE
IDF

LAUNDRY

DW DDW W
CBG CR

TRASH ROOM
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
A2.5
NORTH

FIFTH FLOOR
PLAN
SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”

ONE BEDROOM

TWO BEDROOM

THREE BEDROOM

FOUR BEDROOM

FIFTH FLOOR UNIT MIX
2 UNITS
4 UNITS
5 UNITS
1 UNITS
TOTAL 12 UNITS
---------------------- 0 8 16
E8
DAHLIN
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
18"
pantry
60"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
18"
c
ri
x2
16"
HPWH
18"
pantry
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
15"
5 fr
8x
HPWH
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
HPWH
18"
pantrypypantrypantry
60"60"
y
6060
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.59.

HPWH
18"
pantrypypantrypantry
60"60"
y
6060
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.59.

JAN.

UNIT 3A
UNIT 3A UNIT 3A
UNIT 3A
UNIT 3A
UNIT 2CUNIT 2C
UNIT 2A
UNIT 2A
UNIT 4A
UNIT 1B
UNIT 1A
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
u
g
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantry p
18"
pantry
60"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
18"
c
ri
x2
16"
HPWH
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24" 2
pantry p
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"2
pantryp
FLEX
SPACE
IDF
FLEX
SPACE
CBG CR

TRASH ROOM
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
A2.6
NORTH

SIXTH FLOOR
PLAN
SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”

ONE BEDROOM

TWO BEDROOM

THREE BEDROOM

FOUR BEDROOM

SIXTH FLOOR UNIT MIX
2 UNITS
4 UNITS
5 UNITS
1 UNITS
TOTAL 12 UNITS
E8
DAHLIN
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
NORTH
A2.7

ROOF PLAN

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE

1. TRANSFORMER AT GRADE

2. FLAT ROOF - SLOPE 1/2” PER FOOT MINIMUM TO DRAIN

3. PARAPET WALL WITH METAL CAP, TYP.

4. TRASH VENT EXHAUST

5. ELEVATOR RUN-OUT

6. STAIR TOWER WITH ROOF ACCESS

7. GROUND FLOOR AWNING, TYP.

8. REFER TO SHEET L-2 FOR OUTDOOR COMMUNITY SPACE
KEYNOTE LEGEND:

SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”
4 3
7 8
6 5
2 1
E8
DAHLIN
18"
pantry
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
15"

f
8x
HPWH
UNIT 1A
GROSS AREA: +/- 531 SQ. FT.

NET AREA: +/- 490 SQ. FT.
22'-3"
11'-4 1/2" 10'-10 1/2"
25'-0"
1'-11 1/2"23'-0 1/2"
UNIT 1B
GROSS AREA: +/- 587 SQ. FT.

NET AREA: +/- 539 SQ. FT.
27'-3 1/4"
16'-4 1/4" 10'-11"
26'-7 1/4"
1'-7 1/4"
8'-3 1/2" 1'-11 1/4"14'-9 1/4"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
u
g
UNIT 1C
GROSS AREA: +/- 608 SQ. FT.

NET AREA: +/- 560 SQ. FT.
27'-3 1/4"
26'-7 1/4"
1'-7 1/4"
8'-3 1/2" 16'-8 1/2"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
u
g
BATH

BEDROOMOBB
LIVING

KITCHEN

BEDROOMD MM
LIVING
BATH

KITCHEN

BEDROOMD MM
LIVING
BATH
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
A2.8

TYPICAL UNIT
PLANS - 1BD

SQUARE FOOTAGE
CALCULATIONS:

UNIT GROSS SQFT -

MEASURED TO THE

OUTSIDE FACE OF
PERIMETER STUDS.

UNIT NET SQFT -

MEASURED TO THE
INSIDE FACE OF STUDS.

CHASES EXCLUDED.
*NOTE: OPENINGS
MAY VARY. REFER TO

BUILDING PLANS FOR
MORE INFORMATION.

SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
P I I ~
□~
E8
DAHLIN
18"
pantry
60"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
18"
c
ri
x
16"
HPWH
HPWH
18"
pantrypantrypantrypantry
60"60"60606060
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.59.

UNIT 2A
GROSS AREA: +/- 800 SQ. FT.

NET AREA: +/- 750 SQ. FT.

UNIT 2C
GROSS AREA: +/- 842 SQ. FT.

NET AREA: +/- 786 SQ. FT.
23'-0 1/2" 1'-11 1/2"
25'-0"
33'-0"
22'-6 1/2" 10'-5 1/2"
35'-7 1/2"
28'-0" 7'-7 1/2"
18'-6 1/2" 6'-4 3/4"
24'-11 1/4"
UNIT 2B
GROSS AREA: +/- 821 SQ. FT.

NET AREA: +/- 770 SQ. FT.
25'-0"
33'-0"
18"
pantry
60"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
18"
c
ri
x
16"
HPWH
BEDROOM 1OBB BEDROOM 22222222222222222M 222222222222 22222222222222222 22222222222222222222222222 LIVING

KITCHEN

KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM 1OBB BEDROOM 22222222222222222M 222222222222 222222222222222222 22222222222222222222222222 LIVING

KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM 1ME
BEDROOM 2D O LIVING
BATH
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
A2.9

TYPICAL UNIT
PLANS - 2BD

SQUARE FOOTAGE
CALCULATIONS:

UNIT GROSS SQFT -

MEASURED TO THE

OUTSIDE FACE OF
PERIMETER STUDS.

UNIT NET SQFT -

MEASURED TO THE
INSIDE FACE OF STUDS.

CHASES EXCLUDED.
*NOTE: OPENINGS
MAY VARY. REFER TO

BUILDING PLANS FOR
MORE INFORMATION.

SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
@]
BU
~
~□ DO
E8
DAHLIN
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"
pantry
UNIT 3A
GROSS AREA: +/- 1077 SQ. FT.

NET AREA: +/- 1004 SQ. FT.
44'-0"
10'-8 1/2" 11'-8" 21'-7 1/2"
25'-0"
UNIT 4A
GROSS AREA: +/- 1295 SQ. FT.

NET AREA: +/- 1207 SQ. FT.
25'-0"
23'-0 1/2" 1'-11 1/2"
5'-0"
54'-8"
10'-3 1/2"34'-1"10'-3 1/2"
UNIT 4B
GROSS AREA: +/- 1315 SQ. FT.

NET AREA: +/- 1228 SQ. FT.
25'-0"
5'-0"
54'-8"
44'-4 1/2"10'-3 1/2"
UNIT 3B
GROSS AREA: +/- 1100 SQ. FT.

NET AREA: +/- 1028 SQ. FT.
44'-0"
25'-0"
15 cu ft
refrig
28x29.5
24"
pantry

KITCHEN
BATH 2
BEDROOM 3MEEDDEBBB BEDROOM 2B MEEE BEDROOM 11D M M
BATH 1
LIVING

KITCHEN
BATH 2
BEDROOM 3MEEDDEBBBB BEDROOM 2B MEEE BEDROOM 11D M M
BATH 1
LIVING

KITCHEN
LIVING
BEDROOM 1D 1111MMMBEDROOM 2MMMBBBBBEEEBBEBEDROOM 3DDD 33333M BEDROOM 4ME
BATH 2 BATH 1 KITCHEN
LIVING
BEDROOM 1D MBEDROOM 2MMMBBBBBEEEBBEBEDROOM 3DDD 33333M
BEDROOM 4ME
BATH 2 BATH 1
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
A2.10

TYPICAL UNIT
PLANS - 3BD + 4BD

SQUARE FOOTAGE
CALCULATIONS:

UNIT GROSS SQFT -

MEASURED TO THE

OUTSIDE FACE OF
PERIMETER STUDS.

UNIT NET SQFT -

MEASURED TO THE
INSIDE FACE OF STUDS.

CHASES EXCLUDED.
*NOTE: OPENINGS
MAY VARY. REFER TO

BUILDING PLANS FOR
MORE INFORMATION.

SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
0 ~f[J
E8
DAHLIN
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
NORTH
A3.1

BUILDING

ELEVATIONS
10 4 82 1 23
9 ±72'-6"FROM F.F. TO T.O. PARAPET
57 6
±76'-6"FROM F.F. TO T.O. STAIR ROOF
14 1. PARAPET W/ METAL CAP

2. VERTICAL PANEL SIDING, T.B.D.

3. PAINTED STUCCO W/ CONTROL LINES, TYP.

4. FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING

5. BOX RIB METAL SIDING

6. PAINTED METAL AWNINGS

7. SIGNAGE, FINAL LOCATION T.B.D.

8. VINYL WINDOWS, TYP.

9. STOREFRONT WINDOWS

10. GUARDRAIL

11. METAL ROLL-UP DOOR

12. METAL GRATE

13. METAL GARAGE GATE

14. BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE
ELEVATION KEYNOTES:

SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”
A
D
CKEYPLAN:

SOUTH ELEVATION (STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD)
A
►
A.

E8
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
NORTH
A3.2

BUILDING

ELEVATIONS
1 310
6 12
58 ±72'-6"FROM F.F. TO T.O. PARAPET
±76'-6"FROM F.F. TO T.O. STAIR ROOF
SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”

1. PARAPET W/ METAL CAP

2. VERTICAL PANEL SIDING,
T.B.D.

3. PAINTED STUCCO W/
CONTROL LINES, TYP.

4. FIBER CEMENT PANEL
SIDING

5. BOX RIB METAL SIDING

6. PAINTED METAL AWNINGS

7. SIGNAGE, FINAL
LOCATION T.B.D.

8. VINYL WINDOWS, TYP.

9. STOREFRONT WINDOWS

10. GUARDRAIL

11. METAL ROLL-UP DOOR

12. METAL GRATE

13. METAL GARAGE GATE

14. BUILDING ADDRESS

SIGNAGE
ELEVATION KEYNOTES:

A
D
CKEYPLAN:

EAST ELEVATION
B
►
A.

E8
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
NORTH
A3.3

BUILDING

ELEVATIONS
15 48 3
12 10
±72'-6"FROM F.F. TO T.O. PARAPET
10 ±76'-6"FROM F.F. TO T.O. STAIR ROOF
SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”
A
D
CKEYPLAN:

NORTH ELEVATION
C

1. PARAPET W/ METAL CAP

2. VERTICAL PANEL SIDING, T.B.D.

3. PAINTED STUCCO W/ CONTROL LINES, TYP.

4. FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING

5. BOX RIB METAL SIDING

6. PAINTED METAL AWNINGS

7. SIGNAGE, FINAL LOCATION T.B.D.

8. VINYL WINDOWS, TYP.

9. STOREFRONT WINDOWS

10. GUARDRAIL

11. METAL ROLL-UP DOOR

12. METAL GRATE

13. METAL GARAGE GATE

14. BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE
ELEVATION KEYNOTES:
►
A.

E8
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
NORTH
A3.4

BUILDING

ELEVATIONS
1 10
6 11
13 2 58
72'-6"FROM F.F. TO T.O. PARAPET
±76'-6"FROM F.F. TO T.O. STAIR ROOF
14 SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”
A
D
CKEYPLAN:

WEST ELEVATION (BUCKINGHAM DRIVE)
A

1. PARAPET W/ METAL CAP

2. VERTICAL PANEL SIDING,
T.B.D.

3. PAINTED STUCCO W/
CONTROL LINES, TYP.

4. FIBER CEMENT PANEL
SIDING

5. BOX RIB METAL SIDING

6. PAINTED METAL AWNINGS

7. SIGNAGE, FINAL
LOCATION T.B.D.

8. VINYL WINDOWS, TYP.

9. STOREFRONT WINDOWS

10. GUARDRAIL

11. METAL ROLL-UP DOOR

12. METAL GRATE

13. METAL GARAGE GATE

14. BUILDING ADDRESS

SIGNAGE
ELEVATION KEYNOTES:
►
A.

E8
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
NORTH
A3.5

BUILDING SECTION
9'-1"
±72'-6"FROM F.F. TO T.O. PARAPET
TRASH
9'-1" 12'-0"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"
±76'-6"FROM F.F. TO T.O. STAIR ROOF
GARAGE
SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”
KEYPLAN:

E
E
G
G
FF

COURTYARD SECTION F-F
F
E8
DAHLIN
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
NORTH
A3.6
KEYPLAN:

E
E
G
G
FF
±72'-6"FROM F.F. TO T.O. PARAPET
12'-0"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"

COMMERCIALGARAGE
SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”

BUILDING SECTION

COURTYARD SECTION E-E
E
E8
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
NORTH
A3.7
±72'-6"FROM F.F. TO T.O. PARAPET
12'-0"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"
±76'-6"FROM F.F. TO T.O. STAIR ROOF

GARAGECOMMERCIAL
SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”

BUILDING SECTION
KEYPLAN:

E
E
G
G
FF

COURTYARD SECTION G-G
G
E8
DAHLIN
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
NORTH
A4.1

BUILDING

PERSPECTIVE
KEYPLAN:

SCALE: N.T.S.
: .... _ ___ ->~ --
0 - - - - - -
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
A4.2
CO L O R + MATERIAL S
NOTE: Color Samples may vary from their true color with different printers and computer monitors. COLORS + MATERIALS COLOR 1
EXTERIOR WALL MATERIAL - PANEL + ACCENT
Salty Dog SW 9177 by Sherwin Williams
1 1 2 3 5 14 73 6
COLOR 2

EXTERIOR WALL MATERIAL - PANEL
Westchester Gray SW 2849 by Sherwin Williams
2 COLOR 3

EXTERIOR WALL MATERIAL - PANEL
Gray Clouds SW 7658 by Sherwin Williams
3 COLOR 4

EXTERIOR WALL MATERIAL - STUCCO
Extra White SW 7006 by Sherwin Williams
4 COLOR 5

EXTERIOR WALL MATERIAL - PANEL
Icy SW 6534 by Sherwin Williams
5 COLOR 6

EXTERIOR WALL MATERIAL - STUCCO
Emberglow SW 6627 by Sherwin Williams
6 COLOR 7
EXTERIOR WALL MATERIAL - BOX RIB SIDING, T.B.D.
7 +++
SCALE: N.T.S.
□
□
□□□
□
□
... ----- 1;_-=====-
- DAHLIN
3941 STEVENS CREEK | SANTA CLARA, CA
CRP AFFORDABLE 5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200
1648.001

12.17.2021
JOB NO.

DATE
NORTH
A4.3

CODE COMPLIANCE
- ALLOWABLE AREA

CALCULATIONS
UP
UP
W/D
DN
UP
DNUP
DN
UP
DNUP
DN
UP
DNUP
DN
UP
DNUP
DN
UP
DN
6)
%8,/',1*$
,8
6)
%8,/',1*$
5
6)
%8,/',1*$
0 6)
%8,/',1*$
5
6)
%8,/',1*$
6
6)
%8,/',1*&
5
6)
%8,/',1*%
5

00.00
6)
%8,/',1*&
5
6)
%8,/',1*%
5

00.00 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 GROUND FLOOR
1/16" = 1'-0" 2 2ND FLOOR
1/16" = 1'-0" 3 3RD FLOOR
1/16" = 1'-0" 4 4TH FLOOR
1/16" = 1'-0" 5 5TH FLOOR
1/16" = 1'-0" 6 6TH FLOOR
Type IA Construction - BUILDING A

MULTISTORY MIXED OCCUPANCY BUILDING

ALLOWABLE AREA CALCULATION
Occ. Type Actual Area Allowable Area
I.U.

I.U. 434 SF UNLIMITED
M
M 2,709 SF UNLIMITED
R-2
R-2 3,784 SF UNLIMITED
S-2
S-2 11,859 SF UNLIMITED
Total Building Area 18,786 SF
Complies

GROUND FLOOR
<UNLIMITED Yes

BUILDING COMPLIES
BUILDING A <UNLIMITED Yes
Type IIIA Construction - BUILDING B

MULTISTORY SINGLE OCCUPANCY BUILDING

ALLOWABLE AREA CALCULATION
Occ. Type
Actual
Area At NS Frontage Perimeter W If
Allowable
Area
A/a=
Total < 1

BUILDING B
2ND FLOOR T.O.SLAB
R-2 8,158 SF 24,000 SF 24,000 SF 0" 1'-0" 0" 0.0000 24,000 SF 0.34 8,158 SF 0.34
T.O.S.F. 3RD FLOOR
R-2 8,112 SF 24,000 SF 24,000 SF 0" 1'-0" 0" 0.0000 24,000 SF 0.34 8,112 SF 0.34
T.O.S.F. 4TH FLOOR
R-2 8,112 SF 24,000 SF 24,000 SF 0" 1'-0" 0" 0.0000 24,000 SF 0.34 8,112 SF 0.34
T.O.S.F. 5TH FLOOR
R-2 8,112 SF 24,000 SF 24,000 SF 0" 1'-0" 0" 0.0000 24,000 SF 0.34 8,112 SF 0.34
T.O.S.F. 6TH FLOOR
R-2 8,112 SF 24,000 SF 24,000 SF 0" 1'-0" 0" 0.0000 24,000 SF 0.34 8,112 SF 0.34
Total Building
Area 40,606 SF 1.69
BUILDING A/a= COMPLIES
BUILDING B 1.69 <2 Yes
Complies
2ND FLOOR T.O.SLAB
<1 Yes
T.O.S.F. 3RD FLOOR
<1 Yes
T.O.S.F. 4TH FLOOR
<1 Yes
T.O.S.F. 5TH FLOOR
<1 Yes
T.O.S.F. 6TH FLOOR
<1 Yes
Type IIIA Construction - BUILDING C

MULTISTORY SINGLE OCCUPANCY BUILDING

ALLOWABLE AREA CALCULATION
Occ. Type
Actual
Area At NS Frontage Perimeter W If
Allowable
Area
A/a=
Total < 1

BUILDING C
2ND FLOOR T.O.SLAB
R-2 6,068 SF 24,000 SF 24,000 SF 0" 1'-0" 0" 0.0000 24,000 SF 0.25 6,068 SF 0.25
T.O.S.F. 3RD FLOOR
R-2 5,974 SF 24,000 SF 24,000 SF 0" 1'-0" 0" 0.0000 24,000 SF 0.25 5,974 SF 0.25
T.O.S.F. 4TH FLOOR
R-2 5,974 SF 24,000 SF 24,000 SF 0" 1'-0" 0" 0.0000 24,000 SF 0.25 5,974 SF 0.25
T.O.S.F. 5TH FLOOR
R-2 5,974 SF 24,000 SF 24,000 SF 0" 1'-0" 0" 0.0000 24,000 SF 0.25 5,974 SF 0.25
T.O.S.F. 6TH FLOOR
R-2 5,974 SF 24,000 SF 24,000 SF 0" 1'-0" 0" 0.0000 24,000 SF 0.25 5,974 SF 0.25
Total Building
Area 29,964 SF 1.25
BUILDING A/a= COMPLIES
BUILDING C 1.25 <2 Yes
Complies
2ND FLOOR T.O.SLAB
<1 Yes
T.O.S.F. 3RD FLOOR
<1 Yes
T.O.S.F. 4TH FLOOR
<1 Yes
T.O.S.F. 5TH FLOOR
<1 Yes
T.O.S.F. 6TH FLOOR
<1 Yes
N.T.S.

ALLOWABLE AREA
LEGEND:

BUILDING A

BUILDING B

BUILDING C

KEYNOTE LEGEND

00.00 IMAGINARY LINE BETWEEN BUILDINGS OR PROPERTY

LINE OR CENTERLINE OF STREET OR PUBLIC WAY, SCD &
SITE PLAN A1 SERIES
■
■ m
NTS
(PLOTTER TRACKING INFORMATION) S:\office\Drawings\04721\Construction\Production COVER SHEETGENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONSOVERALL TREE PLANCONSTRUCTION CALLOUT PLAN 1ST FLOORLAYOUT PLAN 1ST FLOORCONSTRUCTION CALLOUT & LAYOUT PLAN 2ND FLOORSHRUB PLANSHRUB IRRIGATION PLAN 1ST FLOORTREE IRRIGATION PLAN 1ST FLOORSHRUB & TREE IRRIGATION PLAN 2ND FLOORCONSTRUCTION DETAILSPLANTING DETAILSIRRIGATION DETAILS L-0.0
L-1.1
L-2.1L-3.1
L-3.2L-3.3
L-4.1
L-5.1
L-5.2
L-5.3
L-6.1 - 6.2
L-7.1
L-8.1 - 8.3

PROJECTAREA
DAHLIN GROUP ARCHITECTUREPLANNING5865 OWENS DRIVE,PLEASANTON, CA 94588925.251.7200; 925.251.7201f BKF ENGINEERS4670 WILLOW ROAD, SUITE 250PLEASANTON, CA 94588925.396.7700 EMERALD CITY ENGINEERS, INC.21705 HIGHWAY 99LYNWOOD, WA 98036425.741.1200ELEMENT STRUCTURALENGINEERS, INC.29675 CEDAR BLVD., SUITE 295CNEWARK, CA 94560510.573.1557 STRUCTURALENGINEER:

UTILITYENGINEER:

ARCHITECT:

CIVILENGINEER:

SITE MAP

VICINITY MAP
LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR:SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIATHE M

ERIDIAN
Know what's below.
before you dig.

Call
R

MWELO STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
"I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE WATER EFFICIENTLANDSCAPING ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM ACCORDINGLYFOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION DESIGN PLAN."
PHILIP A. VANDERTOOLEN, PRINCIPALVANDERTOOLEN ASSOCIATES, INC.

CA LICENSE # 2798

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
NTS

PROJECTSITE




COVER SHEET
PREPARED FOR:

CONSULTANTS:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

L-0.0
EG
MC
I \
~ Sl..,11111eree1,;1ttd MERIDIAN
I
j
OVPRESS t
JURDO

I NORTHLAKE
.Ju,Hpe,oserrafwy <iii
0 GENERAL

CONSTRUCTION
NOTES
L-1.1

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

Copyright 2021 vanderToolen Associates. The drawings or written materials contained herein constitute the original and unpublished work of the landscape architect. Reproduction, use or alteration in any form is strictly prohibited without the written consent of vanderToolen Associates. 


CONCRETE

1. GENERAL
A. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, AND EQUIPMENT TO

CONSTRUCT THE CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, AND NOTED HEREIN.

B. ALL CONCRETE SHALL CONSIST OF PORTLAND CEMENT, FINE AGGREGATE (SAND), COARSE AGGREGATE AND WATER, PROPORTIONED AND MIXED TO ATTAIN 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2800 PSI WITH A SLUMP NOT TO EXCEED THREE INCHES.

CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS.

C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFORM WITH ALL APPLICABLE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN "
RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE FORMWORK" PUBLICATION # 347-78 OF THE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE.

D. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ONE 4' X 4' X 4" DEEP SAMPLE OF EACH CONCRETE FINISH WITH JOINT IN PLACE AT THE JOB SITE. APPROVED SAMPLES SHALL BE THE STANDARDS OF THE FLATWORK.

2. MATERIALS
A. CEMENT STYLE SHALL BE TYPE II LOW ALKALI PORTLAND CEMENT CONFORMING TO ASTM C-150. THE SAME BRAND OF CEMENT SHALL BE USED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.

B. WELDED WIRE MESH (WWM) SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A-185.

C. COLOR: NATURAL GRAY EXCEPT WHERE NOTED ON PLANS.

D. CURING/SEALING: L.M. SCOFIELD LITHOCHROME COLORWAX CURING COMPOUND.

E. GLARE REDUCER: L.M. SCOFIELD CHROMIX L-10 AT 1/2% WHERE NOTED ON PLANS.

SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C979 FOR UV RESISTANCE.

F. REINFORCING STEEL FOR PAVING AND WALLS SHALL BE NEW BILLET STEEL BARS CONFORMING TO ASTM A615-68.

3. FORMS
A. FORMS SHALL BE FREE OF WARP, SET PLUMB AND TRUE TO LINE AND GRADE WITH

UPPER EDGES FLUSH WITH SPECIFIED GRADE OR FINISH SURFACE OF THE CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENT, AND NOT MORE THAN 1/2" WIDER THAN THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS OF THE EDGE OF THE CONCRETE TO BE PLACED.

B. WOODEN FORMS SHALL HAVE A NET THICKNESS OF AT LEAST 1-1/2" AND SHALL BE FREE FROM IMPERFECTIONS WHICH WOULD IMPAIR THE STRENGTH FOR THE USE INTENDED.

BENDERS OR THIN PLANK FORMS MAY BE USED ON CURVES. FORMS SHALL BE SECURED

BY NAILING TO SIDE STAKES OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH AND CROSS SECTIONAL AREA TO ADEQUATELY RESIST LATERAL DISPLACEMENT DURING THE PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE.

4. FINISHING
A. CONCRETE SURFACES SHALL BE FLOATED PRIOR TO STEEL TROWEL. FORMED EDGES SHALL BE ROUNDED TO A RADIUS OF 1/2" OR AS SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS. EDGES AT EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE ROUNDED TO A RADIUS OF 1/4". EXPANSION JOINTS TO BE 20' O.C. DEEP TOOLED JOINTS TO BE 10' O.C. AND SCORE JOINTS TO BE 5' O.C.

B. CONCRETE FINISHES SHALL BE AS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFIED HEREIN.

C. NATURAL GRAY CONCRETE SHALL INCLUDE 'SYNTHETIC BLACK' GLARE REDUCER.

D. NO ADVERTISING IMPRESSION, STAMPS, OR MARKS OF ANY DESCRIPTION WILL BE PERMITTED ON CONCRETE SURFACES. BROOM FINISH SHALL BE PERFORMED AFTER

FINISH TROWELLING BY DRAWING THE FOLLOWING BROOM TYPES ACROSS THE NARROWEST WIDTH OF CONCRETE.
1) MEDIUM BROOM FINISH - PUSH WITH MEDIUM OR STIFF BRISTLES.

5. JOINTS
A. SET PREMOLDED EXPANSION JOINT STRIP BELOW FINISH GRADE SURFACE,

TEMPORARILY SECURED TO THE TOP OF EXPANSION STRIP OR USE PLASTIC FILLER STRIP. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED WITH POLYSULFIDE OR POLYURETHANE WATERPROOF CAULKING. USE 1/2" EXPANSION JOINTS THROUGHOUT.

B. SCORED CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE TOOLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4" AND SHALL HAVE A RADIUS OF 1/8".

6. CURING COMPOUND
A. RESIN-BASE, CLEAR CURING COMPOUND CONFORMING TO ASTM C 309, TYPE 2.

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS TO FURNISH AND INSTALL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE PROJECT SITE THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS OF WORK IN A REASONABLE, DRY, WORKABLE CONDITION, FREE OF SURFACE WATER.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PLACEMENT OF ALL PIPES PRIOR TO

THE INSTALLATION OF PAVING AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT MAY CREATE CONFLICTS WITH INSTALLATION OF OTHER WORK.

4. THE BOTTOM OF TRENCHES SHALL BE GRADED AND PREPARED TO PROVIDE A FIRM AND UNIFORM BEARING SURFACE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF PIPE.

5. ALL TRENCHES SHALL BE BACK-FILLED WITH CLEAN, ON-SITE MATERIAL COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION.

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT FINISH GRADES OF LANDSCAPE TO DIRECT WATER TOWARDS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES OR STREET AS APPLICABLE.

7. FINISH GRADES IN PLANTER AREAS SHALL BE 1 INCH BELOW TOP OF CURB OR PAVING IN TURF AREAS AND 2" BELOW TOP OF GRADE OR PAVING IN SHRUB AREAS.

8. ALL EXISTING GRADES AND PAD ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE PER THE CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS.

9. GENERALLY, ALLOWABLE SLOPES FOR PAVING AND LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:

MINIMUM MAXIMUM
CONCRETE WALKS (LONGITUDINAL): 0% 5% CONCRETE WALKS (CROSS SLOPES): 1% 2% LANDSCAPE AREAS: 2% 5%

10. GRADE BREAK TRANSITIONS CONSTRUCTED IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SMOOTH WITHOUT ANY NOTICEABLE POINT.

11. THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE ALL CONCRETE FORM WORK IN PLACE

PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE, AND RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE ANY FIELD MODIFICATIONS AND GRADE ADJUSTMENTS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE FINISH GRADES OF

ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANT MATERIAL.

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS

GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES

1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE

AND LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES, BY LICENSED CONTRACTORS AND EXPERIENCED WORKMEN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND FEES RELATING TO HIS/HER WORK.

2. LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE, VERIFY LOCATIONS WITH CIVIL ENGINEERS AND UTILITY PLANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR ALL DAMAGES INCURRED.

3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN FROM FACE OF WALL OR EDGE OF PAVING OR BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN. THE DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN FOR

APPROXIMATE LINE, ALL RADII AND CURVES ARE TO HAVE CONTINUOUS AND SMOOTH TRANSITIONS WITHOUT ABRUPT CHANGES OR BENDS.

4. ALL FORMS AND ALIGNMENT OF PAVING SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO POURING; (MINIMUM 48 HOUR NOTICE.)

5. THESE NOTES SHALL BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PLANS; ANY DISCREPANCIES

SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLAN FEATURES.

6. CONDITIONS NOT SPECIFICALLY SHOWN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SIMILAR TO THE DETAILS FOR THE RESPECTIVE MATERIALS.

7. THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED STRUCTURE. ALL BRACING, TEMPORARY SUPPORTS, SHORING, ETC. IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. OBSERVATION VISITS TO THE SITE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DO NOT

INCLUDE INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND SAFETY CONDITIONS AT THE WORK SITE.

8. SAFETY OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY:

A. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INITIATING, MAINTAINING, AND

SUPERVISING ALL PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT.

B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE RESPONSIBLE PRECAUTIONS FOR THE SAFETY OF, AND

SHALL PROVIDE REASONABLE PROTECTION TO PREVENT DAMAGE, INJURY, OR LOSS TO: EMPLOYEES ON THE SITE AND OTHER PERSONS WHO MAY BE AFFECTED THEREBY;

THE WORK, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT TO BE INCORPORATED THEREIN, WHETHER IN

STORAGE ON OR OFF SITE, UNDER CARE, CUSTODY, OR CONTROL OF THE CONTRACTOR OR THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS; AND OTHER PROPERTY AT

THE SITE OR ADJACENT THERETO SUCH AS TREES, SHRUBS, LAWNS, PAVEMENTS, ROADWAYS, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES.

9. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE AND INSTALL SLEEVE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON IRRIGATION PLANS.

10. DESIGN, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND PRODUCTS OTHER THAN THOSE DESCRIBED BELOW

OR INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS MAY BE CONSIDERED FOR USE, PROVIDED PRIOR

APPROVAL FOR USE IS OBTAINED FROM THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND APPLICABLE GOVERNING AUTHORITY. NO VARIATION FROM DESIGN, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, OR PRODUCT SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT SUCH APPROVALS.

11. WALLS AND FENCES ARE SHOWN TO BE CENTERED ON PROPERTY LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

12. CONCRETE ENTRY WALKS ARE TO BE CENTERED ON ENTRY STOOPS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

GENERAL PLANTING NOTES

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A QUALIFIED SUPERVISOR ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND THROUGH THE COMPLETION OF PICKUP WORK.

2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES ARE LISTED FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR.

ACTUAL NUMBER OF SYMBOLS SHALL HAVE PRIORITY OVER QUANTITY DESIGNATED.

3. VERIFY EXISTING GRADE IN FIELD PRIOR TO PLANTING. EXISTING GRADE SHALL BE WITHIN ± ONE TENTH (1/10) OF A FOOT OF FINISH GRADE. FINISH GRADE SHALL BE 1 INCH BELOW TOP OF CURB AND/OR PAVING IN TURF AREAS AND 2 INCHES BELOW TOP OF CURB OR PAVING IN GROUND COVER AREAS.

4. PRIOR TO PLANTING, IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY OPERATIONAL. THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING.

5. PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.

6. PRIOR TO START OF PROJECT CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SOURCES OF PLANT MATERIALS AND TREES TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.

7. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND/OR THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. PLANT MATERIALS REJECTED FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE SITE.

8. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE ALL TREE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MIN. 72 HOURS PRIOR TO SCHEDULE TREE APPROVAL SITE VISIT. ANY AND ALL TREES INSTALLED COULD BE SUBJECT TO RELOCATION AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.

9. ALL VINE RUNNERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE NURSERY STAKES REMOVED AND VINE RUNNERS SHALL BE ESPALIERED TO ADJACENT FENCE, WALL, OR TRELLIS.

10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE FREE OF WEEDS, ROCKS, AND DEBRIS.

11. THE SOILS AMENDMENTS SPECIFIED HEREIN ARE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SOILS AGRONOMY REPORT FROM AN APPROVED SOILS LABORATORY PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIAL. THE

RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDED IN THE PROJECT SOILS AGRONOMY REPORT SHALL SUPERCEDE THESE NOTES.

FOR THE AREA TO BE LANDSCAPED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS SHALL BE CROSS RIPPED OR EQUALLY CULTIVATED BY MEANS OF ROTOTILLING A UNIFORM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES AS FOLLOWS, EXCEPT IN AREAS WITH SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER. IN THESE

AREAS AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE INSTALLED OR ADDED PER PLANTING DETAILS FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL PLANT.

AMOUNT PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET
-4 CU YDS. NITROGEN STABILIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT DERIVED FROM REDWOOD, FIR, OR CEDAR SAWDUST.
-35LBS. 6-20-20 PELLETIZED FERTILIZER
-100LBS. AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM
-13 LBS. SOIL SULFUR

12. THE PLANTING PIT PERIMETERS FOR TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO

TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL, AS NOTED AND SHOWN ON THE PLANTING DETAILS. THE PITS SHALL BE SCARIFIED. THE ROOTBALL SHALL BE SET ON UNDISTURBED SOIL AND THE CROWN SHALL BE SET 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. A 3" BERM SHALL BE CREATED AROUND THE PLANT PIT AND MULCHED WITH 3" MINIMUM BARK MULCH. -6 PARTS ON-SITE SOIL
-4 PARTS BY VOLUME ORGANIC AMENDMENT PER ABOVE (#9) SOIL PREP MIX. -2 LBS/CU. YD. MIX OF 6-24-24 IRON SULFATE
-5 LBS/CU. YD. MIX AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM)

13. THIRTY DAYS AFTER INSTALLATION ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE FERTILIZED WITH APPROVED 16-6-8 FERTILIZER APPLIED AT A RATE OF SIX (6) POUNDS PER 1000 SQ.FT.

FERTILIZER APPLICATION SHALL BE CONTINUED THEREAFTER AT 60 DAY INTERVALS.

14. FERTILIZER TABLETS SHALL BE AGRIFORM, 21 GRAM TABLETS (20-10-5) OR EQUAL IN QUANTITIES AS FOLLOWS:
-1 GALLON SHRUB 1
-5 GALLON SHRUB 3
-15 GALLON SHRUB OR TREE 4
-24" BOX TREE & LARGER 1 PER 4" OF BOX SIZE -PLACE TABLETS AT HALF THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL.

15. ALL SHRUB AND FALLOW AREAS TO RECEIVE 3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF SHREDDED RECYCLED WOOD MULCH WITH COLOR DYE ADDED. BARK COLORING SHALL BE 'MT. DIABLO BLACK', OR APPROVED EQUAL. PRE-DYED RECYCLED WOOD MULCH PROVIDED BY WASTE

MANAGEMENT EARTHCARE, A DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT RECYCLE AMERICA (877) 963-2784 wmearthcare.com

16. PRIOR TO COMPLETION, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL REVIEW THE PROJECT

LANDSCAPE FOR COMPLIANCE OF INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO A SITE VISIT.

17. TREE SETBACKS SHALL BE:
-6' FROM PAVED SURFACES
-5' FROM WATER METERS AND JOINT TRENCHES
-15' FROM STREETLIGHTS
-10' FROM SANITARY SEWER AND GAS PIPE LINES

18. ALL TREES PLANTED WITHIN 5' OF PAVING, WATER METERS, OR JOINT TRENCHES SHALL

RECEIVE LINEAR RECYCLED PLASTIC ROOT BARRIERS PARALLEL TO CURB AND WALKS- EACH SIDE (24" DEPTH X 10' LENGTH, MIN.) MANUF. DEEPROOT. #UB-24-2. (800) 458-7668.

19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE THAT ALL SHRUBS ARE FREE FROM DEFECT IN MATERIAL OR WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. TREES SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ANY DEFECTIVE PLANT MATERIAL OR WORKMANSHIP AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER DURING THIS PERIOD.

GRADING NOTES

1. PRIOR TO INITIATING WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL GRADES, UTILITY LOCATIONS, EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS.

IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY CITY ENGINEER OF ANY FIELD DISCREPANCIES WITH PLANS.

2. ALL PLANTED AREAS TO SLOPE TO AREA DRAINS AT A MINIMUM 2 % SLOPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

3. ALL LANDSCAPE DRAINLINES TO FALL AT A MINIMUM 1 % SLOPE TO DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. SEE CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS FOR EXISTING ELEVATIONS.

4. ALL LANDSCAPE DRAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON PLAN. DRAINS

THAT ARE NOT INSTALLED, OR THE RESULT OF SUCH ACTION SHALL NOT BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.

5. FINISH GRADES IN PLANTED AREAS SHALL BE 1" BELOW TOP OF CURB OR PAVING IN TURF AREAS AND 2" BELOW TOP OF CURB OR PAVING IN SHRUB AREAS. 1% CROSS SLOPE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. FINISH GRADE SHALL BE SET PRIOR TO PLANTING. ANY

DISCREPANCY OR UNFINISHED AREAS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PLANTING.

6. CONCRETE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE RISER AT FACE OF STOOP IF APPROACHING ENTRY WALKWAY EXCEEDS MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE OF 5% AS DESIGNATED IN "CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS' ON THIS SHEET. SEE "CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS" ON THIS SHEET, FOR ADDITIONAL CONCRETE SLOPE AND LOT GRADING CRITERIA.

7. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1% CROSS SLOPE OR AS NOTED ON PLANS.

1. THE IRRIGATION PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC: ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHOWN WITHIN

PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN CLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTING AREAS. ALL VALVES AND SYSTEM EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LOCATED IN SHRUB AREAS WHEREVER POSSIBLE.

2. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED BY A LICENSED CONTRACTOR IN CONFORMANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES/ORDINANCES. THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND FEES RELATED TO HIS WORK ON THE PROJECT.

3. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH GRADE DIFFERENCES AND WITH ALL LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, AND FENCES. THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH OTHERS FOR THE LOCATION AND

INSTALLATION OF PIPE SLEEVES AND LATERAL LINES THROUGH FOOTINGS, UNDER PAVING, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY HIS WORK AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.

4. DO NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS SHOWN WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN

THE FIELD THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES, OR DIFFERENCES IN AREA DIMENSIONS EXIST THAT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED IN THE ENGINEERING.

SUCH DISCREPANCIES SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IN THE EVENT THAT THIS NOTIFICATION IS NOT PERFORMED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY NECESSARY REVISIONS.

5. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN IS BASED ON THE MINIMUM PRESSURE AND THE MAXIMUM FLOW DEMAND AS STATED ON THE DRAWINGS FOR EACH POINT OF CONNECTION. THE

IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY STATIC WATER PRESSURE, SERVICE LINE SIZE, AND WATER METER SIZE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE

ACTUAL WATER PRESSURE, SERVICE SIZE, AND METER SIZE WITH THAT INDICATED ON THE

DRAWINGS IS TO BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AS WELL AS THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK.

6. ALL PIPE SIZES SHALL CONFORM TO THOSE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. LATERAL PIPE NOT SIZED ON DRAWINGS AND DOWNSTREAM OF 1" PIPE SHALL BE 3/4" SIZE. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF SMALLER PIPE SHALL BE PERMITTED. HOWEVER, SUBSTITUTIONS FOR LARGER PIPE SIZES MAY BE APPROVED.

7. ALL MAINLINE PIPING AND CONTROL WIRES UNDER PAVING OR WALLS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SEPARATE SLEEVES. MAINLINE SLEEVES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWICE (2x) THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE TO BE SLEEVED. CONTROL WIRE SLEEVES SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE (MINIMUM 1" SIZE) FOR THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF WIRES UNDER PAVING.

8. ALL EXCAVATIONS ARE TO BE BACKFILLED TO 85% COMPACTION (95% UNDER PAVING) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ELECTRICAL

POWER SOURCE IN THE FIELD WITH THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND THE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS. ANY DISCREPANCIES MUST BE REPORTED TO BOTH THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE

APPROVAL OF ALL CONTROLLER LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND SHALL MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTION FROM THE ELECTRICAL SOURCE TO THE CONTROLLER(S).

10. IRRIGATION CONTROL WIRE SHALL BE #14-1, U.L. APPROVED FOR DIRECT BURIAL. COMMON WIRE SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR AND PILOT WIRES SHALL BE A COLOR OTHER THAN WHITE.

11. ALL WIRE SPLICES SHALL BE MADE WITHIN VALVE BOXES. SPLICES SHALL BE MADE WITH A COPPER CRIMP-TYPE CONNECTOR AND INSTALLED WITHIN '3M' #DBY SEALING PACK, OR APPROVED EQUAL.

12. ALL IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE SET PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FLUSH AND ADJUST ALL SPRINKLER

HEADS, NOZZLES, AND VALVES FOR OPTIMUM COVERAGE WITH MINIMAL OVERSPRAY ONTO PAVING, WALKS, WALLS, FENCES, ETC.

13. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT NOT OTHERWISE DETAILED OR SPECIFIED SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.

14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE THAT THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS FREE FROM

DEFECTS IN MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY DEFECTIVE MATERIALS OR WORK AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.

15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN ACCURATE AS-BUILT SET OF IRRIGATION DRAWINGS PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. THE AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE DELINEATED ON REPRODUCIBLE MATERIALS.

GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES
AHLIN
UP
UP

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
EUG

EUGEUGEUGEUG
UP
UP

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
EUG

EUGEUGEUGEUG
W/DW/D
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
0' 10' 20' 40'

TREE PLAN
L-2.1
•
REFER TO SHEET L-1.1 FOR GENERAL PLANTING NOTES.
•
REFER TO SHEETS L-7.1 FOR PLANTING DETAILS.

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

TREE LEGEND
24" BOX = 32 TOTAL TREES

TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT WUCOLS IV QTY
CERCIS CANADENSIS TEXENSIS 'OKLAHOMA' OKLAHOMA TEXAS REDBUD 24"BOX MOD 3 CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS 'TINY TOWER' ITALIAN CYPRESS 24"BOX LOW 4 GINKGO BILOBA 'PRINCETON SENTRY' PRINCETON SENTRY MAIDENHAIR TREE 24"BOX MOD 3 LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA `CATAWBA` STD CATAWBA CRAPE MYRTLE 24"BOX LOW 8 PLATANUS ACERIFOLA LONDON PLANE TREE 24"BOX MOD 5

MWELO STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
"I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE WATER EFFICIENTLANDSCAPING ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM ACCORDINGLY

FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE
DESIGN PLAN."
PHILIP A. VANDERTOOLEN, SENIOR PRINCIPAL
VANDERTOOLEN ASSOCIATES, INC.

CA LICENSE # 2798
NOTES:

1. NO CUTTING OF ANY PART OF PRIVATE TREES, INCLUDING ROOTS, SHALL BE DONE WITHOUT SECURING PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY ARBORIST.

2. TREE TRIMMING/ REMOVAL SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA

TREE PRESERVATION / CITY ARBORIST SPECIFICATIONS AND WITH DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A CERTIFIED ARBORIST (CERTIFICATION OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE).TREE PLAN - 2ND FLOOR TREE PLAN - 1ST FLOOR
L.....J"""1.... @
UP
UP

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
EUG

EUGEUGEUGEUG
UP
UP

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
EUG

EUGEUGEUGEUG
1 1
6 3
W1
P2 S5
S4a
S5PA
PA
PAP1
P1
P2
5 1
2 2
P10
8 3
1 1
1 1 1
1 4
2 8
W5



CONSTRUCTION

CALLOUT PLAN
1F
L-3.1
•
REFER TO SHEET L-1.1 FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES.
•
REFER TO SHEETS L-6.1 THRU L-6.2 FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
0' 10' 20' 40'
KEY

CONSTRUCTION & HARDSCAPE SCHEDULE
DETAIL

REFERENCE
P1

DESCRIPTION
MANFCTR./

SUPPLIERFINISHCOLOR
P2
P3

DETAIL A,
SHEET L-6.1
6" WIDE CONCRETE BAND
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
BLACK

DETAIL B,
SHEET L-6.1-
P9

GREEN - -
6" WIDE COLORED CONCRETE CURB AT

PLAY SURFACING

TOPCAST
#03 SURFACE

RETARDER
-33%TEAL

NATURAL GRAY MEDIUM
BROOM
FINISH
P10

NATURAL GRAY

NATURAL GRAY
MEDIUM
BROOM
FINISH

PLAYGROUNDS

UNLIMITED
EPIC

PLASTICS
#100082778

CONCRETE PAVING,

SCORE PATTERN AS SHOWN
PODIUM DECK SCORING PATTERN - 1;
24"x24"
PODIUM DECK SCORING PATTERN - 2;
24"x48"
PODIUM DECK SCORING PATTERN - 3;
RUNNING BOND PATTERN SIZE 8"x36"
PODIUM DECK SCORING PATTERN - 4;
PATTERN SIZE 36"x36"

PLAYBOUND POURED IN PLACE PLAY
SURFACE. EPDM RUBBER & EXTREME-10

ALIPATHIC URETHANE BINDER
'BENDA BOARD' HEADER
(.65" x 5.35" x 19'-10" / 1 x 6 x 20)

NATURAL GRAY

DETAIL D,
SHEET L-6.1
33%BRIGHT GRN
33%BEIGE

DISSAPATOR, BASALT WALL ROCK
1' DEEP SET LEVEL WITH SOIL OF PLANTER LYNGSO

TOPCAST
#03 SURFACE

RETARDER

TOPCAST
#03 SURFACE

RETARDER

DETAIL C,
SHEET L-6.1
KEY

WALL AND RAILING SCHEDULE
DETAIL

REFERENCE
W1

DESCRIPTION
MANFCTR./

SUPPLIERFINISHCOLOR
W2
W3
W4
PODIUM DECK PLANTER WALL.

APPLY MONOPOLE, INC. PERMASHIELD 200

ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING OR EQUAL TO ALL

EXPOSED SURFACES PER MANUFACTURERS
RECOMMENDATION.

BASALITE

TO MATCH

BUILDING
BLACK
GROUND
FACE
WALL:

STANDARD 438
CAP:

STANDARD 225
42" HIGH GUARDRAIL AT PODIUM DECK, AEGIS
II EXTREME. MAJESTIC, PRE-FAB 2-RAIL
8' PANELS, STANDARD BOTTOM

PERMACOAT AMERISTAR

TO MATCH

BUILDING
PODIUM DECK PLANTER WALL CAP.

SQUARE MODULAR 7-1/4" x 24" x 3-3/8"
APPLY MONOPOLE, INC. PERMASHIELD 200

ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING OR EQUAL TO ALL

EXPOSED SURFACES PER MANUFACTURERS
RECOMMENDATION.

ALMOND 1806 STEPSTONESMOOTH
-
6'-0" HIGH BLOCK WALL WITH BEVELED CAP.

APPLY MONOPOLE, INC. PERMASHIELD 200

ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING OR EQUAL TO ALL

EXPOSED SURFACES PER MANUFACTURERS
RECOMMENDATION.

DETAIL F,
SHEET L-6.1

DETAIL G,
SHEET L-6.1
W5
BLACKHANDRAIL AT RAMP.

RAMP PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS.

POWDER
COAT
- DETAIL C,
SHEET L-6.2

SITE AMENITIES SCHEDULE
KEY

SENSORY BOARD
DETAIL

REFERENCE
S3

DESCRIPTION
MANUFACT. /
SUPPLIER OR REP.FINISHCOLOR
SILVER
SILVER
-

POWDER COAT

POWDER COAT
-

DETAIL X,
SHEET L-X.X

DETAIL X,
SHEET L-X.X
MODEL
NO.MATERIAL

ALUMINUM

CAST ALUMINUM
-
-
S4
S5
S1
S2

LANDSCAPE
FORMS

LANDSCAPE
FORMS
S6

PLAY STRUCTURE POWDER COAT PARK PLANET DETAIL B,
SHEET L-6.2
---
(8) 36" DIAMETER URBAN COLLECTION PLANTER
w/ INTERNAL, MANUAL WATERING SYSTEM TOURNESOLSMOOTHFRP IRRI-CWM-1720-3K

ELECTRIC CHEF DETAIL H,
SHEET L-6.1SKU: 4400-EC-448-I-S-32STAINLESS STEEL --

PLAYCRAFT SYSTEMS
S-1684-R5

DETAIL B,
SHEET L-6.2
(2) MELVILLE BACKLESS BENCH W/ ALUMINUM
SEAT. SURFACE MOUNT.
(8) EMERSON BIKE RACKS
SURFACE MOUNT.
(2) BUILT-IN ELECTRIC BBQ'S
REQUIRED OUTLET: NEMA 6-30R RECEPTACLE,
208/220 VOLT 30 AMP RECEPTACLE

BACKLESS

ALUMINUM SEAT

PARK PLANET

DETAIL A
SHEET L-6.2
PLANTER - UCS-3600-SROYALTY
BLUE

SILVER POWDER COAT DETAIL X,
SHEET L-X.XALUMINUMS4a

LANDSCAPE
FORMS
(1) MELVILLE BACKLESS BENCH W/ ALUMINUM
SEAT AND CENTER ARM. SURFACE MOUNT.

BACKLESS

ALUMINUM SEAT
AMERISTAR FENCING www.ameristarfence.com
BASALITE CONCRETE PRODUCTS www.basalite.com
ELECTRIC CHEF www.electri-chef.com
EPIC PLASTICS www.epicplastics.com
IRON AGE DESIGN www.ironagegrates.com
LANDSCAPE FORMS www.landscapeforms.com
LYNGSO www.lyngsogarden.com
MONOPOLE, INC. www.monopoleinc.com
PLAYGRONDS UNLIMITED www.playgroundsunlimited.net
PARK PLANET www.parkplanet.com
STEPSTONE, INC. www.stepstoneinc.com
TOPCAST SURFACE RETARDER www.gcpat.com
TOURNESOL SITEWORKS www.tournesol.com

CONTACT INFORMATION
PLANTING AREA (PA).

DRIVEWAY PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS

SIDEWALK PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS
BIORETENTION AREA, PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY BIOTREATMENT SOIL MIX

LIGHTING PER ELECTRICAL ENGINEER'S PLANS
VIEW TRIANGLE, PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS. PLANTING MATERIAL SHALL NOT EXCEED 36" HIGH

UTILITIES, BY OTHERS

GENERAL CALLOUTS
KEY DESCRIPTION1 2 3
4 5
6 7

IS APPROPRIATE FOR PLANTING AND AMEND PER SOIL ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATIONS 8 5FT. FIRE ACCESS
AHLIN
0 Ir
'" 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Q
''-' IU
0 ~
0 0 0
0 K) 0
p
0 0
L..J"'""7....._ 0
UP
UP

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
EUG

EUGEUGEUGEUG
UP
UP

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
EUG

EUGEUGEUGEUG
2'-9" TYP. 2'-9" TYP.

ALN.

ALN.
4'-6"
TYP.
6"
TYP.
3'-0"
CLR.

PA
PA
PA
1'-0"
5'-0"
TYP.
5'-0"
5'-0"
5'-0"



CONSTRUCTION

LAYOUT PLAN
1F
L-3.2
•
REFER TO SHEET L-1.1 FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES.
•
REFER TO SHEETS L-6.1 THRU L-6.2 FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
0' 10' 20' 40'
LC

ALIGNCENTERLINE

RADIUSEND OF CURVE RADIUSFACE OF CURB

PROPERTY LINEEQUALLY SPACED

TYPICALBACK OF WALKPOINT OF BEGINNING
B.O.W.

TYP.

EQ.

P.L.

F.O.C.

E.C.R.

R
ALN.

LAYOUT LEGEND
P.O.B.

POST TOP LIGHT PER UTILITY ENGINEER

LIGHTED BOLLARD PER UTILITY ENGINEER

TRANSFORMER WITH PAD PER JOINT TRENCH

FIELD INLET PER CIVIL ENGINEER

FIRE HYDRANT PER CIVIL ENGINEER

AREA DRAIN PER CIVIL ENGINEER

BACKFLOW PER CIVIL ENGINEER

ACCESSIBLE RAMP PER CIVIL ENGINEER

UTILITY LEGEND
J_
[2
ml
l!i!
....
1-- ----,t
L.....f""""""""

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
W/D

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
W/D
2 S3
P9
1 P5
W2 W3 1
W2 W3 1
S1
S2
S4
S3
S3
S6
P3
W4
P4
P4
P4 P4
P7
P7
P5
P4
P5
P6
P6
P6

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
W/D

BUILDING
6'-3" 6'-3"
4'-0"
MIN.
136° 3' 4'-3"
136°
4'-0"
3'
4'-0"
3'-0"
12'-0" 12'-0"
ALN.

ALN.

CL
DOOR
3'-3"
9'-3"
19'-6"
45°
EQ. EQ.CL
R=28'-6"
1'-0"
TYP.
1'-0"
TYP.
1'-0"
TYP.
4'-0"
MIN.
3'-0"
MIN.
45°
5'-0"
MIN.
4'-6"3'-6"
1'
2'-0"
TYP.
2'-0"
TYP.

CL
POT
11'-0"
5'-0"
5'-0"

CONSTRUCTION

CALLOUT &
LAYOUT PLAN 2F
L-3.3
•
REFER TO SHEET L-1.1 FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES.
•
REFER TO SHEETS L-6.1 THRU L-6.2 FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

ALIGNCENTERLINE

RADIUSEND OF CURVE RADIUSFACE OF CURB

PROPERTY LINEEQUALLY SPACED

TYPICALBACK OF WALKPOINT OF BEGINNING
B.O.W.

TYP.

EQ.

P.L.

F.O.C.

E.C.R.

R
ALN.

LAYOUT LEGEND
P.O.B.

POST TOP LIGHT PER UTILITY ENGINEER

LIGHTED BOLLARD PER UTILITY ENGINEER

TRANSFORMER WITH PAD PER JOINT TRENCH

FIELD INLET PER CIVIL ENGINEER

FIRE HYDRANT PER CIVIL ENGINEER

AREA DRAIN PER CIVIL ENGINEER

BACKFLOW PER CIVIL ENGINEER

ACCESSIBLE RAMP PER CIVIL ENGINEER

UTILITY LEGEND
KEY

CONSTRUCTION & HARDSCAPE SCHEDULE
DETAIL

REFERENCE
P1

DESCRIPTION
MANFCTR./

SUPPLIERFINISHCOLOR
P2
P3

DETAIL A,
SHEET L-6.1
6" WIDE CONCRETE BAND
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
BLACK

DETAIL B,
SHEET L-6.1-
P9

GREEN - -
6" WIDE COLORED CONCRETE CURB AT

PLAY SURFACING

TOPCAST
#03 SURFACE

RETARDER
-33%TEAL

NATURAL GRAY MEDIUM
BROOM
FINISH
P10

NATURAL GRAY

NATURAL GRAY
MEDIUM
BROOM
FINISH

PLAYGROUNDS

UNLIMITED
EPIC

PLASTICS
#100082778

CONCRETE PAVING,

PLAYBOUND POURED IN PLACE PLAY
SURFACE. EPDM RUBBER & EXTREME-10

ALIPATHIC URETHANE BINDER
'BENDA BOARD' HEADER
(.65" x 5.35" x 19'-10" / 1 x 6 x 20)

NATURAL GRAY

DETAIL D,
SHEET L-6.1
33%BRIGHT GRN
33%BEIGE

DISSAPATOR, BASALT WALL ROCK
1' DEEP SET LEVEL WITH SOIL OF PLANTER LYNGSO

TOPCAST
#03 SURFACE

RETARDER

TOPCAST
#03 SURFACE

RETARDER

DETAIL C,
SHEET L-6.1
KEY

WALL AND RAILING SCHEDULE
DETAIL

REFERENCE
W1

DESCRIPTION
MANFCTR./

SUPPLIERFINISHCOLOR
W2
W3
W4
PODIUM DECK PLANTER WALL.

APPLY MONOPOLE, INC. PERMASHIELD 200

ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING OR EQUAL TO ALL

EXPOSED SURFACES PER MANUFACTURERS
RECOMMENDATION.

BASALITE

TO MATCH

BUILDING
BLACK
GROUND
FACE
WALL:

STANDARD 438
CAP:

STANDARD 225
42" HIGH GUARDRAIL AT PODIUM DECK, AEGIS
II EXTREME. MAJESTIC, PRE-FAB 2-RAIL
8' PANELS, STANDARD BOTTOM

PERMACOAT AMERISTAR

TO MATCH

BUILDING
PODIUM DECK PLANTER WALL CAP.

SQUARE MODULAR 7-1/4" x 24" x 3-3/8"
APPLY MONOPOLE, INC. PERMASHIELD 200

ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING OR EQUAL TO ALL

EXPOSED SURFACES PER MANUFACTURERS
RECOMMENDATION.

ALMOND 1806 STEPSTONESMOOTH
-
6'-0" HIGH BLOCK WALL WITH BEVELED CAP.

APPLY MONOPOLE, INC. PERMASHIELD 200

ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING OR EQUAL TO ALL

EXPOSED SURFACES PER MANUFACTURERS
RECOMMENDATION.

DETAIL F,
SHEET L-6.1

DETAIL G,
SHEET L-6.1
W5
BLACKHANDRAIL AT RAMP.

RAMP PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS.

POWDER
COAT
- DETAIL C,
SHEET L-6.2

SITE AMENITIES SCHEDULE
KEY

SENSORY BOARD
DETAIL

REFERENCE
S3

DESCRIPTION
MANUFACT. /
SUPPLIER OR REP.FINISHCOLOR
SILVER
SILVER
-

POWDER COAT

POWDER COAT
-

DETAIL X,
SHEET L-X.X

DETAIL X,
SHEET L-X.X
MODEL
NO.MATERIAL

ALUMINUM

CAST ALUMINUM
-
-
S4
S5
S1
S2

LANDSCAPE
FORMS

LANDSCAPE
FORMS
S6

PLAY STRUCTURE POWDER COAT PARK PLANET DETAIL B,
SHEET L-6.2
---
(8) 36" DIAMETER URBAN COLLECTION PLANTER
w/ INTERNAL, MANUAL WATERING SYSTEM TOURNESOLSMOOTHFRP IRRI-CWM-1720-3K

ELECTRIC CHEF DETAIL H,
SHEET L-6.1SKU: 4400-EC-448-I-S-32STAINLESS STEEL --

PLAYCRAFT SYSTEMS
S-1684-R5

BACKLESS

ALUMINUM SEAT

PARK PLANET

DETAIL A
SHEET L-6.2
PLANTER - UCS-3600-SROYALTY
BLUE

SILVER POWDER COAT DETAIL X,
SHEET L-X.XALUMINUMS4a

LANDSCAPE
FORMS
(1) MELVILLE BACKLESS BENCH W/ ALUMINUM
SEAT AND CENTER ARM. SURFACE MOUNT.

BACKLESS

CONTACT INFORMATION
PLANTING AREA (PA).

DRIVEWAY PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS

SIDEWALK PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS
BIORETENTION AREA, PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY BIOTREATMENT SOIL MIX

LIGHTING PER ELECTRICAL ENGINEER'S PLANS
VIEW TRIANGLE, PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS. PLANTING MATERIAL SHALL NOT EXCEED 36" HIGH

UTILITIES, BY OTHERS

GENERAL CALLOUTS

KEY DESCRIPTION
1 2
3 4 5
6 7

IS APPROPRIATE FOR PLANTING AND AMEND PER SOIL ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATIONS 8 5FT. FIRE ACCESS
AHLIN
I I
)S,-o
11:1
I!!]
.... !-- ----t
• + I
11 □ I
L.....J""""""""
UP
UP

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
EUG

EUGEUGEUGEUG
UP
UP

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
EUG

EUGEUGEUGEUG
19 SM
3 PM
3 GN
3 CR
24 SM
9 AV
10 SM
30 SM
AV
11 AB
6 CR
3 CV
8 14
DM
SM
10 AV
6 7
AV
10 SM
SM
7 CV
4 AB
5 SM
21 AV
9 SM
9 SM
20 6
GN
CV
10 PM
3 SM
6 SM
8 6
CT CK
5 JP
9 7
JP18
RC
6 CV
CK
5 8
CV
8 AB
4 PM
123
DM
JP
6 JP
3 CT
19 5
CT
14 DM
14 DM
14 DM
14 DM
RP
9 38
RP
9 CT
6 JP
6 JP
W/DW/D
3 NL
2 NC
NL
3 AD
20 CT
18 5
AL
NC
2 8
AF
AL
7 2
SM
2 SM
2 SM
SM
2 SM
2 SM
2 2
SM
2 SM
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
0' 10' 20' 40'
•
REFER TO SHEET L-1.1 FOR GENERAL PLANTING NOTES.
•
REFER TO SHEETS L-7.1 FOR PLANTING DETAILS.

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

MWELO STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
"I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE WATER EFFICIENTLANDSCAPING ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM ACCORDINGLY

FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE
DESIGN PLAN."
PHILIP A. VANDERTOOLEN, SENIOR PRINCIPAL
VANDERTOOLEN ASSOCIATES, INC.

CA LICENSE # 2798
DV
8 NOTE:

1. PLANT CAN SIZE PER SYMBOL.

SEE PLANT CONTAINER SIZE KEY.

PLANT ABBREVIATION

PLANTING CALLOUT LEGEND

NUMBER OF PLANTS

PLANT CONTAINER SIZE KEY
15 GALLON
5 GALLON
1 GALLON

SHRUB PLAN
L-4.1


SHRUB PLAN - 2ND FLOOR
SHRUB PLAN - 1ST FLOOR

SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS IV QTY
AV AGAVE VICTORIAE-REGINAE QUEEN VICTORIA AGAVE 5 GAL LOW 42 AB AGAVE X 'BLUE GLOW' BLUE GLOW AGAVE 5 GAL LOW 19
AD ASPARAGUS DENSIFLORUS `MYERS` MYERS ASPARAGUS 1 GAL MOD 20 AL AZALEA RUTHERFORDIANA 'ALASKA' ALASKA AZALEA 5 GAL MOD 12 AF AZALEA X 'FIELDER'S WHITE' FELDER'S WHITE SOUTHERN AZALEA 5 GAL MOD 8 CK CALAMAGROSTIS X A. `KARL FOERSTER` FEATHER REED GRASS 1 GAL MOD 10 CV CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS `LITTLE JOHN` DWARF WEEPING BOTTLEBRUSH 5 GAL LOW 36 CT CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM CAPE RUSH 5 GAL LOW 57
CR CORDYLINE AUSTRALIS 'RED STAR' RED STAR GRASS PALM 5 GAL LOW 6 GN GREVILLEA X `NOELLII` GREVILLEA 5 GAL LOW 9
JP JUNCUS PATENS CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH 1 GAL LOW 37
NL NANDINA D. `LEMON LIME` LEMON LIME NANDINA 5 GAL LOW 6 NC NEPETA FAASSENII CATMINT 1 GAL LOW 4
PM PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLLUS `MAKI` MAKI SHRUBBY YEW PODOCARPUS 15 GAL MOD 10 RC RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `EVE CASE` CALIFORNIA COFFEE BERRY 5 GAL LOW 18 RP RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 'PINK DANCER' PINK DANCER INDIAN HAWTHORN 1 GAL LOW 47

GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS IV SPACING QTY DM DYMONDIA MARGARETAE SILVER CARPET DYMONDIA 1 GAL LOW 20" o.c. 193 SM SENECIO MANDRALISCAE BLUE FINGER 1 GAL LOW 24" o.c. 190 TURF SOD BIOFILTRATION SOD AVAILABLE AT DELTA BLUEGRASS SOD MOD 1,215 SF 800.637.8873

PLANT SCHEDULE
[lEBI
----------- ~,,:::==========~- ~~~''), iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiill C
8 0
AHLIN
UP
UP

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
EUG

EUGEUGEUGEUG
UP
UP

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
EUG

EUGEUGEUGEUG
M
C1
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
0' 10' 20' 40'
•
REFER TO SHEET L-1.1 FOR GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES.
•
REFER TO SHEETS L-8.1 THRU L-8.2 FOR IRRIGATION DETAILS.

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION

HUNTER ICV-G
1", 1-1/2", 2", AND 3" PLASTIC ELECTRIC REMOTE

CONTROL VALVES, GLOBE CONFIGURATION, WITH NPT
THREADED INLET/OUTLET.

PIPE TRANSITION POINT TO MULTI-EMITTER LAYOUT.

CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE FINAL LOCATIONS &
QUANTITIES OF MULTI-EMITTER HEADS & LATERALS. SEE
DETAIL C, SHEET L-10.3.

RAIN BIRD 44-LRC
1" BRASS QUICK-COUPLING VALVE, WITH

CORROSION-RESISTANT STAINLESS STEEL SPRING,
LOCKING THERMOPLASTIC RUBBER COVER, AND 2-PIECE
BODY IN VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING COVER.
1" HOSE END GARDEN VALVE
NIBCO T-113
CLASS 125 BRONZE GATE SHUT OFF VALVE WITH WHEEL

HANDLE, SAME SIZE AS MAINLINE PIPE DIAMETER AT
VALVE LOCATION. SIZE RANGE - 1/4" - 3"
HUNTER FLOW SENSOR HFS-FCT-100

FLOW-SENSING ASSEMBLY W/NORMALLY OPEN SUPERIOR
3100 MASTER VALVE. FLOW SENSOR COMMUNICATION
CABLE TO BE RUN FROM FLOW SENSOR TO CONTROLLER.

MASTER VALVE CONTROL WIRE TO BE RUN FROM MASTER
VALVE TO CONTROLLER.

FEBCO LF825Y 1"

REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER
HUNTER IC-2400

MODULAR CONTROLLER WITH WIRELESS SOLAR SYNC
MODULE, 24 STATIONS.

WATER METER 3/4"
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: PVC CLASS 200 SDR 21
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
PIPE SLEEVE: PVC SCHEDULE 40

PIPE & WIRE SLEEVING UNDER ALL PAVING AS INDICATED
ON PLAN 2" MINIMUM SIZE OR TWICE THE SIZE OF PIPE

TO BE SLEEVED, WHICHEVER IS GREATER
C1
M

IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT LEGEND

SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD XACZ-100-PRF MEDIUM FLOW DRIP CONTROL
KIT, 1" ANTI-SIPHON VALVE FILTER, 1" RBY FILTER, AND 40PSI PRESSURE REGULATOR, FOR ABOVE GRADE INSTALLATION.
3 GPM-15 GPM.

AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE
RAIN BIRD XFS-CV-09-18

XFS-CV SUB-SURFACE LANDSCAPE DRIPLINE WITH A
HEAVY-DUTY 4.3 PSI CHECK VALVE. 0.9 GPH EMITTERS AT
18" O.C. DRIPLINE LATERALS SPACED AT 18" APART, WITH
EMITTERS OFFSET FOR TRIANGULAR PATTERN. SPECIFY
XF INSERT FITTINGS.

AREA TO RECEIVE DRIP EMITTERS
OLSON EH-12
VIBRACLEAN 12 OUTLET EMITTER HEAD W/ 1704 (1 GPH)
PRESSURE COMPENSATING EMITTER VALVES. PROVIDE
EMITTER OUTLETS AS FOLLOWS:

EMITTERS (2 ASSIGNED TO EACH 5 GAL PLANT)
EMITTERS (1 ASSIGNED TO EACH 1 GAL PLANT)

DRIP LEGEND
GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES:

1. THE IRRIGATION PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL IRRIGATION

EQUIPMENT SHOWN WITHIN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN

CLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE
PLANTING AREAS. ALL VALVES AND SYSTEM EQUIPMENT
SHALL BE LOCATED IN PLANTING AREAS. CONTRACTOR

SHALL INSTALL MAINLINE AND LATERALS CLEAR OF JOINT
TRENCH PER CODE.

2. RECYCLED WATER IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE
INSTALLED WHERE APPLICABLE.

MWELO STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
"I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE MODEL WATEREFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE

EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE I
RRIGATION DESIGN PLAN."
S-XX.X"
XX GPM

VALVE SIZE
TYPE

CONTROLLER DESIGNATION
VALVE # GALLONS PER

MINUTE QUANTITY

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

RCV LEGEND
SHRUB

IRRIGATION PLAN
1F
L-5.1



THIS PROJECT'S IRRIGATION SYSTEM HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO BE RETROFITTED TO USE RECYCLED WATER WHEN IT BECOMES AVAILABLE.

AHLIN
~
I
D
□
"'
-
L.....f"""""""1
UP
UP

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
EUG

EUGEUGEUGEUG
UP
UP

STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
EUG

EUGEUGEUGEUG
M
C1
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
0' 10' 20' 40'
•
REFER TO SHEET L-1.1 FOR GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES.
•
REFER TO SHEETS L-8.1 THRU L-8.2 FOR IRRIGATION DETAILS.

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES:

1. THE IRRIGATION PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL IRRIGATION

EQUIPMENT SHOWN WITHIN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN

CLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE
PLANTING AREAS. ALL VALVES AND SYSTEM EQUIPMENT
SHALL BE LOCATED IN PLANTING AREAS. CONTRACTOR

SHALL INSTALL MAINLINE AND LATERALS CLEAR OF JOINT
TRENCH PER CODE.

2. RECYCLED WATER IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE
INSTALLED WHERE APPLICABLE.

MWELO STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
"I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE MODEL WATEREFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE

EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE I
RRIGATION DESIGN PLAN."
S-XX.X"
XX GPM

VALVE SIZE
TYPE

CONTROLLER DESIGNATION
VALVE # GALLONS PER

MINUTE QUANTITY

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

RCV LEGEND
TREE

IRRIGATION PLAN
1F
L-5.2



SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION

RAIN BIRD RWS-M-B-C
ROOT WATERING SYSTEM WITH 4.0" DIAMETER X 18" LONG

WITH LOCKING GRATE, SEMI-RIGID MESH TUBE, AND CHECK
VALVE. RAIN BIRD BUBBLER 1402 0.5 GPM.2 PER TREE
1402

TREE BUBBLER LEGEND

SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION

HUNTER ICV-G
1", 1-1/2", 2", AND 3" PLASTIC ELECTRIC REMOTE

CONTROL VALVES, GLOBE CONFIGURATION, WITH NPT
THREADED INLET/OUTLET.

PIPE TRANSITION POINT TO MULTI-EMITTER LAYOUT.

CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE FINAL LOCATIONS &
QUANTITIES OF MULTI-EMITTER HEADS & LATERALS. SEE
DETAIL C, SHEET L-10.3.

RAIN BIRD 44-LRC
1" BRASS QUICK-COUPLING VALVE, WITH

HANDLE, SAME SIZE AS MAINLINE PIPE DIAMETER AT
VALVE LOCATION. SIZE RANGE - 1/4" - 3"
HUNTER FLOW SENSOR HFS-FCT-100

FLOW-SENSING ASSEMBLY W/NORMALLY OPEN SUPERIOR
3100 MASTER VALVE. FLOW SENSOR COMMUNICATION
CABLE TO BE RUN FROM FLOW SENSOR TO CONTROLLER.

MASTER VALVE CONTROL WIRE TO BE RUN FROM MASTER
VALVE TO CONTROLLER.

FEBCO LF825Y 1"

REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER
HUNTER IC-2400

MODULAR CONTROLLER WITH WIRELESS SOLAR SYNC
MODULE, 24 STATIONS.

WATER METER 3/4"
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: PVC CLASS 200 SDR 21
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
PIPE SLEEVE: PVC SCHEDULE 40

PIPE & WIRE SLEEVING UNDER ALL PAVING AS INDICATED
ON PLAN 2" MINIMUM SIZE OR TWICE THE SIZE OF PIPE

TO BE SLEEVED, WHICHEVER IS GREATER
C1
M

IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT LEGEND

AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE
RAIN BIRD XFS-CV-09-18

AREA TO RECEIVE DRIP EMITTERS
OLSON EH-12
VIBRACLEAN 12 OUTLET EMITTER HEAD W/ 1704 (1 GPH)
PRESSURE COMPENSATING EMITTER VALVES. PROVIDE
EMITTER OUTLETS AS FOLLOWS:

EMITTERS (2 ASSIGNED TO EACH 5 GAL PLANT)
EMITTERS (1 ASSIGNED TO EACH 1 GAL PLANT)

DRIP LEGEND
AHLIN
s
@
~
a
l
®
7 ©
□
□
[2
"
-CD .
.

I
I

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
GEUG
W/D

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
GEUG
W/D
C2

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
GEUG
W/D

BUCKINGHAM DRIVE
GEUG
W/D
C2
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
0' 10' 20' 40'
•
REFER TO SHEET L-1.1 FOR GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES.
•
REFER TO SHEETS L-10.1 THRU L-10.2 FOR IRRIGATION DETAILS.

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES:

1. THE IRRIGATION PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL IRRIGATION

EQUIPMENT SHOWN WITHIN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN

CLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE
PLANTING AREAS. ALL VALVES AND SYSTEM EQUIPMENT
SHALL BE LOCATED IN PLANTING AREAS. CONTRACTOR

SHALL INSTALL MAINLINE AND LATERALS CLEAR OF JOINT
TRENCH PER CODE.

2. RECYCLED WATER IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE
INSTALLED WHERE APPLICABLE.

S-XX.X"
XX GPM

VALVE SIZE
TYPE

CONTROLLER DESIGNATION
VALVE # GALLONS PER

MINUTE QUANTITY

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

RCV LEGEND

MWELO STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
"I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE MODEL WATEREFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE

EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE I
RRIGATION DESIGN PLAN."

SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION

RAIN BIRD RWS-B-C
ROOT WATERING SYSTEM WITH 4.0" DIAMETER X 18" LONG

WITH LOCKING GRATE, SEMI-RIGID MESH TUBE, AND CHECK
VALVE. RAIN BIRD BUBBLER 1402 0.5 GPM.2 PER TREE
1402

TREE BUBBLER LEGEND

SHRUB & TREE

IRRIGATION PLAN
2F
L-5.3


SHRUB IRRIGATION - 2ND FLOOR
TREE IRRIGATION PLAN - 2ND FLOOR

SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION

RAIN BIRD ASVF

ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE, WITH
ATMOSPHERIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER. 3/4", 1"
AVAILABLE.
1" HOSE END GARDEN VALVE
HUNTER IC-2400

MODULAR CONTROLLER WITH WIRELESS SOLAR SYNC
MODULE, 24 STATIONS.

IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: PVC CLASS 200 SDR 21
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
PIPE SLEEVE: PVC SCHEDULE 40

PIPE & WIRE SLEEVING UNDER ALL PAVING AS INDICATED
ON PLAN 2" MINIMUM SIZE OR TWICE THE SIZE OF PIPE

TO BE SLEEVED, WHICHEVER IS GREATER
C2

IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT LEGEND

DRIP IRRIGATION LEGEND

SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD XACZ-100-PRF MEDIUM FLOW DRIP CONTROL KIT, 1" ANTI-SIPHON VALVE FILTER, 1" RBY FILTER, AND 40PSI
PRESSURE REGULATOR, FOR ABOVE GRADE INSTALLATION.
3 GPM-15 GPM..

AREA TO RECEIVE DRIP BUBBLERS

RAIN BIRD PCT BUBBLER, LOW FLOW PRESSURE
COMPENSATING MODULES. OFFERED IN 5 GPH AND 10 GPH
FLOWS. LIGHT BROWN = 5 GPH AND GREEN = 10 GPH.

AREA TO RECEIVE DRIP EMITTERS
OLSON EH-12
VIBRACLEAN 12 OUTLET EMITTER HEAD W/ 1704 (1 GPH)
PRESSURE COMPENSATING EMITTER VALVES. PROVIDE
EMITTER OUTLETS AS FOLLOWS:

EMITTERS (2 ASSIGNED TO EACH 5 GAL PLANT)
EMITTERS (1 ASSIGNED TO EACH 1 GAL PLANT)
Bubbler Notes:

PCT-05 bubbler (1 assigned to each 1 gal plant)
PCT-10 bubbler (1 assigned to each 5 gal & 15 gal plant)

THIS PROJECT'S IRRIGATION SYSTEM HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO BE RETROFITTED TO USE RECYCLED WATER WHEN IT BECOMES AVAILABLE.

AHLIN
I.
..
□
--- ---
I . l I
..
~
r= _= _= _=_=_ ===iii
L.....J"""1....@
A B C
FED
G H

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

CONSTRUCTION

DETAILS
L-6.1



CONCRETE PAVING
SCALE: 1-1/2" = 1'-0"
1 CONCRETE PAVING. SEE
CONSTRUCTION PLAN, SHEET L-2.0,
FOR COLOR AND FINISH.
4"
2 3
4 CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE,

COMPACTION, & THICKNESS PER SOIL'S
REPORT RECOMMENDATION.
5 6

REINFORCING PER SOIL'S REPORT
RECOMMENDATION.
1/2" TOOLED RADIUS.

COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR
ENGINEERED FILL.
1/4" WIDE X 3/4" DEEP TOOLED CONTROL
JOINT (SEE PLANS).
7 3/8" WIDE FIBER FILLED EXPANSION
JOINT @ 20' O.C. MAX W/ POLYSULFIDE
SEALANT. SEALANT COLOR TO MATCH
ADJACENT PAVING.
8 FINISH GRADE. 2" BELOW TOP OF
PAVING FOR PLANTING AREA AND 1"
BELOW TOP OF PAVING FOR TURF.
9 THICKENED EDGE AT PLANTING AREA
WHERE REQUIRED.
1 2
3 6"
8 9
6 7
4 5
1 2
8 1
2 6
SCALE: 1" = 1' - 0"

PLAY SURFACE

DRAIN CONNECTION PER ARCHITECT
9 POURED IN PLACE RUBBER TOP SURFACE. SEE

CONSTRUCTION CALLOUT PLAN FOR COLOR
SPECIFICATION.

PODIUM DECK PER ARCHITECT3
4 POURED IN PLACE SHREDDED
SBR RUBBER CUSHION LAYER.
5 7

GRAVEL BASE ROCK PER ARCHITECT
40 OZ. WOVEN FILTER FABRIC. OVER ENTIRE
SUBGRADE AND DRAIN MAT. AVAIL. FROM
FABRISCAPE INC. (800) 992.0550 OR EQUAL.
3' x 3' SUB SURFACE ENKA DRAIN MATERIAL OR
EQUAL OVER DRAIN INLET.

CONNECTION TO STORM DRAIN LINE PER CIVIL

ENGINEER

SLOPE TO DRAIN, PER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
3 4
56 7
8 9
9 1 2"
SEE NOTE 1
NOTES

1. DEPTH OF CUSHION LAYER SHALL BE DETERMINED BY

MANUFACTURER IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL SAFETY
REGUALTIONS. SEE TABLE

2. INSTALLED SURFACING SHALL PROVIDE IMPACT ATTENUATION

FOR THE SPECIFIED PLAY EQUIPMENT WITH CONFIRMED FALL
HEIGHT. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SURFACE

MANUFACTURERS CERTIFICATION THAT PROPOSED

SURFACING DEPTH MEETS THIS CRITERIA
ASTM 1292

FALL HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS

CRITICAL FALL HEIGHT TOTAL SYSTEM DEPTH

OF EQUIPMENT
UP TO 4' CFH 1.75"
UP TO 5' CFH 2.25"
UP OT 6' CFH 2.75"
6 1
3 4
5 SCALE: 1" = 1' - 0"

PAVING TO POURED IN PLACE TRANSITION
POURED IN PLACE RUBBER SURFACE.

ADJACENT CONC. PAVING REFER TO
DETAIL A, THIS SHEET.

GRAVEL DRAIN ROCK PER ARCHITECT

PODIUM DECK PER ARCHITECT
POURED-IN-PLACE CONCRETE CURB.
12" LONG #3 BAR @ 32" O.C.
4 1
4 2%1%
5 6
6"
2 NOTES:

1. PROVIDE DEEP SCORELINES @ 10'
O.C. AND FULL DEPTH EXPANSION
JOINT @ 20' O.C.
2 3

PLASTIC HEADERBOARD
SCALE: 1-1/2" = 1'-0"
5 4
1 5
2 4
3 2
1 3
6 6
SET HEADER 2" ABOVE GRADE AT
SHRUBS AND 1" AT TURF.

FINISH GRADE AT SHRUB /
GROUNDCOVER AREA. 2" BELOW TOP
OF STAKE.
18" PRE-DRILLED STAKE @ 3' O.C. MIN.

DOUBLE 1X BEND-A-BOARD AT
RADIUS SECTIONS LESS THAN 3'
ONLY, LEAVE 1/2" GAP IN
SLIP JOINTS & END OF RUNS.
(AVAILABLE FROM EPIC PLASTICS)
SCREW TO STAKES W/ (2) #10 X 3"
GALV. DECK SCREWS.

FINISH GRADE AT TURF AREAS. 1"
BELOW TOP OF STAKE.
7 GAUGE HAIRPIN (AVAILABLE FROM
EPIC PLASTICS) AT SLIP JOINTS.
2X BEND-A-BOARD AT RADIUSES
LARGER THAN 3' AND STRAIGHT
SECTIONS ONLY. PROVIDE 4" LAP
JOINTS @ CONTINUOUS JOINTS.
7 7
2 1

EPIC PLASTICS
104 E. TURNER RD. LODI, CA. 95240
(209) 333-6161
SMALL
RADIUS

SECTION
LARGE

RADIUS &

STRAIGHT

SECTION
45°
SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

BLOCK WALL

BASALITE BEVELED WALL CAP

BASALITE PROTO II WALL SYSTEM,
8 x 8 x 16 CMU, GROUT SOLID ALL CELLS.

BASALITE SMOOTH FINISH, GROUND FACE
CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT.

FINISH GRADE.

COMPACTED SUBGRADE PER GEOTECH
REPORT.

CONCRETE FOOTING PER STRUCTURAL
ENGINEER.
1 2
3 4
5 6
6 2
3 3
1 6'-0"
NOTES:

A. REFER TO CALLOUT SCHEDULE ON SHEET
L-3.1 FOR ALL MATERIALS, COLORS, TYPES,
FINISHES, AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

B. ATTACH CAP WITH TYPE S MORTAR PER
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.

C. APPLY ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING TO WALL.

SECTION
12"
MIN.
4 8"
PL
5 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL - AMERISTAR

NOT TO SCALE
AMERISTAR AEGIS II EXTREME MAJESTC PRE-FAB.

STYLE TO BE 2-RAIL 8' PANELS AND POST ARE GALV.

STEEL WITH "PERMACOAT" FINISH. COLOR TO BE
SLATE GRAY TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE.

SURFACE MOUNT TO WALL PER MANUFACTURER

SPECIFICATIONS
NTS

FOOTING FOR PLAY EQUIPMENT POST

SURFACE MOUNT PLAY EQUIP POST
EMBED PLATE, S.S.D.

FOOTING FOR

PLAYGROUND

STEEL POST

REQUIRES
MINIMUM 4" DEPTH

PLAY SURFACE DRAINAGE,

SEE DETAIL D, THIS SHEET

PLAY SURFACE SHALL COVER

THE POST FOOTING

PODIUM SLAB PER ARCHITECT
4"

BARBEQUE
SCALE:3/4" = 1'-0"
2" 2"
1"
4"
4" 34"
4 1
2 3
5 6

ELEVATION
7 9 9
15"
27" MIN.

CL
1'-8" 1'-8"
4'-0"
PLAN
4 3
2 1 STUCCO FINISH-COLOR TO MATCH
ADJACENT ARCHITECTURE.

COLOR TO BE SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GRAY CLOUDS .

DECKTON PORCELAIN COUNTER.

COLOR TO BE:XX
32" STAINLESS STEEL ELECTRIC

BARBEQUE UNIT
UNIT PER COLUMN CONCEPTS.
(707)747-0400
5 STAINLESS STEEL DOOR
6 FINISH SURFACE.
7 ELECTRICAL LINE FOR EACH
BBQ BY OTHERS.
8 ADA ACCESSIBLE VOID BELOW

COUNTER TOP WITH WALL AT
REAR OF BBQ UNIT.
9 60 MINUTE TIMER SWITCH,
1 AT EACH BBQ.
5'-6" 5'-6"
3"

SECTION
25"
CL
15"
4'-0"
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 01------- 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 I
I
0 1---------= ==== 0
01--------
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 of----------
Oi-------
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 AHLIN
A

CONSTRUCTION

DETAILS
L-6.2


SCALE: NTS

POT IMAGERY
36" TOP X 29.5" BOTTOM X 34" TALL
USC-3600 GFRC URBAN ROUND PLANTER

WITH MATCHING IRRIGATION INSERT

TOURNESOL SITEWORKS

URBAN COLLECTION PLANTER
COLOR: ROYALTY BLUE
FINISH: SMOOTH
B
SCALE: NTS

PLAY STRUCTURE
AVAILABLE FROM: PARK PLANET

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

HANDRAIL & RAMP

NOT TO SCALE
6' O.C. MAX.

EQUAL SPACING
34"
1'-0"
MIN.
1'-0"
MIN.

8.3% MAX.
1-1/2" O.D. STEEL RAIL AND POSTS. COLOR
SHALL BE POWDER-COAT BLACK.

RAISED CURB PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS.

RAMP SURFACE, SLOPE, AND FINISH GRADE
PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS.
3"x12" CAN FORM POUR ROCK SOLID.
1 1
2 2
3 3
4"4"
4 3
NOTE:
- WHERE THE EXTENSION

OF THE HANDRAIL IN THE

DIRECTION OF THE RAMP

RUN WOULD CREATE A

HAZARD, THE EXTENSION
SHALL BE TURNED 90° TO
THE RUN OF THE RAMP.
- METAL SHALL BE FILLET

WELD AND GROUND
SMOOTH.

R3"
R3"

PER STRUCTURAL

ENGINEER

PER STRUCTURAL

ENGINEER
1 3
4 POST IN PLANTING AREA
2 6"
42 C
0 0
0 0
~:, - ·
of-------- 0 -------
The Meridian - Santa Clara

SITE PLAN
PROJECT#: PPT21
DATE: 7/28/2021
40'
PLAYCRAFT REP:

MIN . USE ZONE: 32 ' x 20' Park Planet
■ FORKIDS AGES
5-12
GENERAL NOTES:

Thisl'N,lirninarySitePlanis
ba.., <l onm easurememst hal
wereprovidedin t he ini!ial
plannioigpha se. Alldim ensions
mustbeVl!rifiedpriortoth e
submKSionofapurchao;eorder.

PL,ycraflSym,m,wi ll not be
N,ldresponsibleforany
discrepande,beiweenac:tua l
dimensions and dimensions
submittedint he plannng
pha~
TheMinim.lmU se Zone fora
play struc1<1re isbnedontlle
prcduc:t~nwi1h e time of
proposal. Componernsand
structurndesig nsmaybe
::~~;::::.~~
beforepreparingth e site.W::
stron!1Yrec:ommendotltaining
fillal chw,ng s ffoTith e factc.y
(ava1lableaft er:h e orderis
placecl andinducled iri tll e
AsSM1blyMaoobl)
WARNING;Acc...sib les..fety
:;:~~g :::!~ =mi
equipm,,nt1 t,11hasamtk.a l
heightva loe( FallHeight )
i!Jlpropriateforthe h9lest
accessiblepart ohhis
equipmen! . Refer to the CPSC'S
Hanctiool:FaPublic
Pla)'Qll'O!JndSafely,Section ~:

S<Jrfacing.

Sign Langu~ Pilne,I
"'"~
AHLIN
A B C
FED
G

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

PLANTING

DETAILS
L-7.1



SHRUB PLANTING
N.T.S.

SHRUB - SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL
2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE.
3" HIGH WATERING BASIN.

FINISH GRADE.

AMENDED BACKFILL.

SET ROOTBALL ON LIGHTLY TAMPED
SUPPORT.

PLANT TABLETS - SEE GENERAL
PLANTING NOTES, SHEET L-1.1 FOR
QUANTITY AND SPECIFICATION.
3" DEPTH MULCH.

COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR
ENGINEERED FILL.

NOTE:

1. FERTILIZER TABS ARE NOT TO BE

USED WITH CALIFORNIA NATIVE
SHRUBS.

2. DO NOT USE AMENDED SOIL FOR
CALIFORNIA NATIVE SHRUBS.

TWICE ROOTBALL

DIAMETER
6"1"
1 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
88 6
4 3
2 5
7 C
B
C
N.T.S.

GROUND COVER SPACING CHART
A
A
PLANTING GRID:

A = TRIANGULAR SPACING B= ROW SPACING* C=PERIMETER SET-BACK PLANT SPACING SCHEDULE:
6"
12"
18"
24"
36" 31"±
21"±
16"±
10 1/2"±
5"±
* 0.866 X A
4"
10"
12"
18"
24"
48" 41"± 36"
60" 52"± 48"

TREE STAKING
N.T.S.

TREE.
2" DIAMETER LODGE POLE
PINE STAKE SET 30" INTO

GRADE OR UNDISTURBED

SUBGRADE A MINIMUM OF
12" BELOW BOTTOM OF
ROOTBALL. PLACE STAKES

PARALLEL TO PREVAILING
WINDS.

RUBBER TWIST TIES - KNOT

AND ATTACH TO STAKE W/
ROOFING TACK.

TREE ROOTBALL SET ON
LIGHTLY TAMPED SOIL. DO

NOT PENETRATE ROOTBALL
WITH STAKES.
3" DEEP WATERING BASIN
WITH BARK MULCH.

FINISH GRADE.

AMENDED BACKFILL.

PLANT TABLETS PER

GENERAL PLANTING NOTES,
SHEET L-1.1 FOR QUANTITY
AND SPECIFICATION.

RUBBER TWIST TIES

WRAPPED IN A FIGURE
"8" AROUND TRUNK

TWICE ROOTBALL

DIAMETER
6" 12"
1/21/24"

TO FIRST BRANCH

PREVAILING WIND
PLAN

ELEVATION
NOTE:

1. SCARIFY SIDES OF PLANTING
PIT.

2. FERTILIZED TABS ARE NOT TO

BE USED WITH CALIFORNIA
NATIVE PLANTS.

3. DO NOT USE AMENDED SOIL

FOR CALIFORNIA NATIVE
TREES.

4. SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 1"
ABOVE GRADE.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
1 2
3 5
6 7
8 4
5 2
1 5
4 4
5 3
2 3
2 1

ROOT BARRIER
N.T.S
NOTE:

1. REFER TO THE TREE PLAN, SHEET L-2.1
FOR TREE PLACEMENT AND SETBACKS.

ALL TREES PLANTED WITHIN TREE

SETBACKS OUTLINED ON THE TREE
PLAN, SHEET L-2.1, SHALL RECEIVE

LINEAR RECYCLED PLASTIC ROOT

BARRIER PARALLEL TO ALL PAVING
AND/OR UTILITIES (24" DEPTH X 10'
EACH SIDE, MIN.) MANUF. DEEP ROOT
OR EQUAL. SET ROOT BARRIER 1"
ABOVE FINISH GRADE.

AMENDED BACKFILL.

CONCRETE PAVING. SEE DETAIL A,
SHEET L-8.1.

CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER
CIVIL ENGINEER.

TREE ROOTBALL. SEE DETAIL A, THIS

SHEET FOR TREE PLANTING
INFORMATION.
0 00
00 oo
0 0
o------
0 0
0 0
0 ()1-------
LS-5
0 ------
: :::::,.::-_-·- "'"'\ I (=-
· ::------·- -~=
~
LS-3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o------
AHLIN

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

IRRIGATION

DETAILS
L-8.1


A B C
FED
G H I
NOTES:

1. LEMEUR ENCLOSURE UNIT SHALL BE HINGED;

PROVIDE ADEQUATE SIZE AS REQUIRED TO
HINGE OVER BACKFLOW UNIT.CAST SUPPORT
HARDWARE INTO CONCRETE SLAB.

2. PROVIDE INSULATED BLANKET, POLAR BLANKET
OR EQ.

3. INSTALLATION SHALL BE APPROVED & DEVICE

SHALL BE TESTED BY AN AWWA CERTIFIED
BACKFLOW TESTER.

IRRIGATION MAINLINE FROM WATER METER.

PVC FEMALE ADAPTER.

GALVANIZED 90 ELBOW.
4" CONCRETE PAD ON 4" COMPACTED
AGGREGATE BASE. INSTALL PVC PIPE SLEEVE
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE PAD.

DIELECTRIC UNION.

BRASS NIPPLE, TYPICAL.

FLOW
FLOW
18" MIN
18" MIN12" MIN
6"4"

REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW
N.T.S.

BRASS 90 ELBOW, TYPICAL.

FINISH GRADE.

GALVANIZED NIPPLES, WRAP UNDERGROUND
PIPE WITH (2) WRAPS PIPE TAPE.

CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK ON 2 1/2" PIPE
SIZE OR LARGER. SIZE OF THRUST BLOCK AS
SPECIFIED BY PIPE MFR.

BRONZE WYE STRAINER, LINE SIZE.

REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER
WITH IN LINE VALVES; INSTALL PER LOCAL
CODE & PREFER APPROVED LIST OF DEVICES.

BACKFLOW PREVENTER ENCLOSURE BY
LEMEUR MANUFACTURING OR APPROVED EQ.

PVC MAINLINE SUPPLY TO VALVES.

PREVENTER
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
1 2 2
3 4
5 5
6 6
6 77
8 99
10 11
1213
14 MASTER VALVE W/ FLOW SENSOR
SCALE: N.T.S.

NOTES:

1. ALL WIRES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER LOCAL CODE.

2. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE W/
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.

3. PROVIDE EXPANSION COILS AT EACH WIRE CONNECTION IN
VALVE BOX (10 WRAPS AROUND AT 1/2" DIA. PIPE).

4. SET BOXES 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE OR MULCH COVER IN

GROUND COVER/SHRUB AREAS AND SET FLUSH WITH FINISH
GRADE IN TURF AREAS.

5. UTILIZE PURPLE IDENTIFICATION FOR RECLAIMED LINES.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
10x PIPE DIAMETER
18" MIN.
8 3
2 10
5 4
7 6
1 5
4 9
8 3
7 6 FLOW
MASTER VALVE. SEE LEGEND
FOR TYPE.

FLOW SENSOR. SEE LEGEND
FOR TYPE.

ROUND VALVE BOX W/ M.V.

OR F.S. BURNED INTO LID
(MIN. 2" HIGH)

VALVE BOX EXTENSION,

LENGTH AS REQUIRED

PVC MAINLINE

PEA GRAVEL

BRICK SUPPORTS

FINISH GRADE

WIRE W/ SHIELDED CABLE

TO CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY
W/ 12" MIN. SERVICE COIL

AND WATERPROOF WIRE
SPLICE CONNECTORS. WIRE

COLORS PER
SPECIFICATIONS.

FLOW SENSOR WIRES W/

SHIELDED CABLE TO
CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY.

GATE VALVE 2.5" OR LESS
N.T.S.

VALVE BOX W/ LOCKING COVER AND "GV"
BURNED INTO LID (MIN 2" HIGH).

FINISH GRADE
GATE VALVE. SEE LEGEND FOR TYPE.

VALVE BOX EXTENSION, LENGTH
AS REQUIRED.

PVC MAINLINE
LINE SIZE THREADED PVC MALE ADAPTER.

PEA GRAVEL

BRICK SUPPORTS
RECLAIMED WATER TAG. SEE NOTE.
18"
DO NOT
DRINK
NOTE:

1. UTILIZE PURPLE IDENTIFICATION FOR
RECLAIMED LINES.

2. SET BOXES 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE OR

MULCH COVER IN GROUND COVER/ SHRUB

AREAS AND SET FLUSH WITH FINISH
GRADE IN TURF AREAS.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9

STAKED QUICK COUPLER
SCALE: N.T.S.
3"
10" MINIMUM ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX
W/ LOCKING COVER AND "QC" BURNED
INTO LID (MIN. 2" HIGH)

FINISH GRADE

QUICK COUPLER W/ RUBBER COVER
PEA GRAVEL. (HOLD ROCK ABOVE SWING
JOINT)
PVC SCH. 80 RISER; LENGTH AS REQ'D.

PVC SCH. 40 COUPLING (TT).

PRE-MANUFACTURED PVC DOUBLE SWING
JOINT ASSEMBLY.

PVC SCH. 40 REDUCER BUSHING.

PVC SCH. 40 SST TEE.

PVC MAINLINE.

BRICK SUPPORTS.

GALVANIZED REBAR STAKE W/ TWO
STAINLESS STEEL CLAMPS.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
2 1
3 4
5 6
11 7
8 9
10 12
11 1
2 3
4 5
12 6
5 10
11 12
2 4
9 8
6 7
10 11
7 8
A-1
9 9
6 3
1 NOTES:

1. ALL WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED PER LOCAL CODE.

2. PROVIDE EXPANSION COILS AT EACH WIRE
CONNECTION IN VALVE BOX (10 WRAPS AROUND
A 1/2" DIA. PIPE).

3. SET BOXES 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE OR MULCH

COVER IN GROUND COVER/ SHRUB AREAS AND
SET FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREAS.

4. SCH 80 FITTING UPSTREAM OF VALVE.

5. UTILIZE PURPLE IDENTIFICATION FOR RECLAIMED
LINES.

REMOTE CONTROL VALVE. SEE LEGEND
FOR TYPE.

FINISH GRADE
WATERPROOF WIRE CONNECTORS.

MANUAL UNION BALL VALVE, SAME SIZE
AS REMOTE CONTROL VALVE.

CONTROL WIRES

RECTANGULAR OR JUMBO VALVE BOX W/
LOCKING COVER AND VALVE I.D. BURNED
INTO LID (MIN. 2" HIGH). SEPARATE FOR
LARGER VALVE ZONE AS NEEDED.

PVC UNION

PVC LATERAL PIPE

BRICK SUPPORTS

PEA GRAVEL
I.D. TAG; NUMBERED TO MATCH PLANS.

PVC MAINLINE
RECLAIMED WATER TAG. SEE NOTE #5.
13 DO
NOT
DRINK
13 18" MIN. 7"
6" MIN.

N.T.S.

REMOTE CONTROL VALVE W/

BALL VALVE
90° ELBOW
(T X T)

DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE
N.T.S.
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
NOTES:

1. ALL WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED PER LOCAL
CODES

2. PROVIDE EXPANSION COILS AT EACH WIRE
CONNECTION IN VALVE BOX. (10 WRAPS AROUND
1/2" DIA PIPE)

3. SET BOXES 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE OR MULCH

COVER IN GROUND COVER/ SHRUB AREA AND
FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREA.

AMETEK PLASTIC VALVE BOX W/ GREEN
LOCKING COVER OR EQUAL AND "RCV" BURNED
INTO LID (MIN. 2" HIGH)

PVC UNION

PVC LATERAL PIPE (DEPTH PER SPECIFICATION)

BRICK SUPPORTS

PRESSURE REGULATOR
3/4" DRAIN ROCK
CHRISTY I.D. TAG; NUMBERED TO MATCH PLANS

PVC MAINLINE
1 2
4 7
8 9
10 1112
A-1
13 5
6 14
1 2
3 4
6 5

DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE ASSEMBLY W/

BALL VALVE, FILTER, & PRESSURE REGULATOR

FINISH GRADE, COMPACT SOIL AROUND VALVE
BOX

WIRE CONNECTORS

BALL VALVE

WYE FILTER

CONTROL WIRES
3 90° ELBOW
(T X T)

PIPE & WIRE TRENCHING DETAIL
SCALE: N.T.S.

WIRING

LATERAL

MAINLINE

SNAKE ALL PLASTIC PIPE

INTO TRENCHES AS
SHOWN.

INSTALL ALL 120

VOLT WIRE IN

CONDUIT PER
LOCAL CODE.

PROVIDE A 20" LOOP IN WIRE

AT ALL CHANGES OF

DIRECTION GREATER THAN
30°. REMOVE TIES AFTER ALL

CONNECTIONS HAVE BEEN
MADE.

REMOTE

CONTROL
VALVE
WIRING
120 VOLT
WIRING

LATERALMAIN SUPPLY
*2 1/2" and smaller: 18"
3" and larger: 24"

MAIN SUPPLY, LATERAL

AND WIRING
PLAN

TAPE AND BUNDLE
WIRING AT 10' O.C.

MAXIMUM.

ALL MAINLINE SHALL BE

INSTALLED PER MFG'S
SPECIFICATIONS.

SECTION
18"
18"
*
*
18"

PER LOCAL
CODE
12"
10' MAX.

VALVE BOX INSTALLATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
12" 12" 12"
12"
TYP
EDGE OF LAWN, WALK, FENCE, CURB, ETC.
14' X 19" RECTANGULAR

VALVE BOX
23' X 33" RECTANGULAR

VALVE BOX

TOP VIEW
NOTES:

1. CENTER VALVE BOX OVER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE TO FACILITATE SERVICING VALVE.

2. SET BOXES 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE OR MULCH COVER IN GROUND COVER/ SHRUB AREA AND FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREA.

3. SET RCV AND VALVE BOX ASSEMBLY IN GROUND COVER/ SHRUB AREA WHERE POSSIBLE.

INSTALL IN LAWN ONLY IF GROUND COVER DOES NOT EXIST ADJACENT TO LAWN.

4. SET BOXES PARALLEL TO EACH OTHER AND PERPENDICULAR TO EDGE.

5. AVOID HEAVILY COMPACTING SOIL AROUND VALVE BOXES TO PREVENT COLLAPSE AND DEFORMATION OF VALVE BOX SIDES.
1 2
3 4
5 6
115 V PLUG INTO GFI HOUSE
OUTLET.

IRRIGATION CONTROLLER
PER LEGEND.

WALL.

FLOOR.

PVC SWEEP ELL.

U.F. DIRECT BURIAL WIRES
(TO REMOTE CONTROL
VALVE).

NOTE:

ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL

COMPLY W/ LOCAL AND NATIONAL
CODES
2 3
5 4
6 1
5 INDOOR IRRIGATION CONTROLLER
N.T.S.
0 0
0 0
0 0
o-----
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Oi---------
~
8 o-----
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 i
qr{MC
o-----
0 0
0 0
0 8
0 0
0 o-----
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
ww,iw
~~1 l~ J s,1
AHLIN

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

IRRIGATION

DETAILS
L-8.2


A B C
ED
N.T.S.
6 7
8 9
10 11
5 4
9 7
6 4
5 1
3 2
10 FINISH GRADE.
4" LOCKING GRATE. INSTALL FLUSH WITH FINISH
GRADE OR TOP OF MULCH. (SEE NOTE #3)

PRESSURE COMPENSATING BUBBLER PER
LEGEND

ROOT WATERING SYSTEM (RWS) UNIT
(QUANTITY PER LEGEND). SEE NOTES BELOW.

PRE-ASSEMBLED FITTINGS.
1/2" FLEXIBLE SWING PIPE. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF
18".
1/2" NPT X BARB SWING PIPE ELBOW.

PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL. (ST.)
LATERAL PVC PIPE.

OPTIONAL PEA GRAVEL FOR CLAY SOILS.

OPTIONAL SAND SOCK FOR SANDY SOILS.
1 3
2 8
11 3"
NOTES:

1. ONCE RWS HAS BEEN INSTALLED, FILL THE BASKET WITH PEA GRAVEL.

2. RWS INCLUDES FACTORY ASSEMBLED RISER, BUBBLER, GRATE, SWING ASSEMBLY, CANISTER & FITTINGS.

3. FOR RECLAIMED WATER APPLICATION, INSTALL PURPLE GRATE.

TREE BUBBLER - ROOT WATERING

SYSTEM (RWS)
4"-6"
NOTE:

1. AT FITTINGS WHERE THERE IS A CHANGE OF DIRECTION

SUCH AS TEES OR ELBOWS, USE TIE-DOWN STAKES ON EACH
LEG OF THE CHANGE OF DIRECTION.

COMPRESSION TEE
SUB-SURFACE DRIPLINE. SEE LEGEND FOR TYPE & SPACING.

INLINE DRIP EMITTER. SEE LEGEND FOR TYPE & SPACING.

FINISH GRADE OR SHRUB BED WITH MULCH

GALVANIZED TIE-DOWN STAKE
1 2
3 4
4 3
2 1

SUB-SURFACE DRIPLINE
N.T.S.
5 5

FINISH GRADE

FLUSH CAP FOR EASY FIT
COMPRESSION FITTINGS:

POTABLE:RAIN BIRD MDCFCAP
NON-POTABLE: RAIN BIRD MDCFPCAP
EASY FIT COUPLING:

RAIN BIRD MDCFCOUP
SUBTERRANEAN EMITTER BOX:

RAIN BIRD SEB 7XB
SUB-SURFACE DRIPLINE:

RAIN BIRD XF SERIES DRIPLINE
POTABLE: XFS DRIPLINE
NON-POTABLE: XFSP DRIPLINE
3-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH OF
3/4-INCH WASHED GRAVEL
BRICK (1 OF 2)
NOTE:

1. ALLOW A MINIMUM OF 6-INCHES OF

DRIPLINE TUBING IN VALVE BOX IN

ORDER TO DIRECT FLUSHED WATER
OUTSIDE VALVE BOX.SUB-SURFACE DRIP FLUSH VALVE
SCALE: NTS
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 7
6 4
5 2
3 SUB-SURFACE DRIP AIR RELIEF VALVE
N.T.S.
13 FINISH GRADE AT TURF CONDITIONS
10" ROUND BOX.

FINISH GRADE AT SHRUB PLANTING
1/2" AIR VACUUM/ RELIEF VALVE: TO BE

INSTALLED AT HIGH POINTS IN DRIP
ZONE.
1/2" X 3/4" PVC REDUCER BUSHING.

BARB X FEMALE ADOPTER TEE
DRIPLINE TUBING. SEE LEGEND FOR
TYPE.
3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 4" WASHED
GRAVEL.

BRICK SUPPORT (TYP-3)

TOP OF MULCH
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
21 4
5 6
7 9
8 10
10 ON-SURFACE DRIPLINE:

RAIN BIRD XF SERIES DRIPLINE
POTABLE: XFS DRIPLINE
NON-POTABLE: XFSP DRIPLINE

INLINE DRIP EMITTER OUTLET, SEE
PLANS FOR DRIPLINE OUTLET SPACING.

BARB TEE 17x17x17mm

RAIN BIRD XFF-TEE
BARB COUPLING 17x17mm

RAIN BIRD XFF-COUP
BARB ELBOW 17x17mm

RAIN BIRD XFF-ELBOW

BARB MALE ADAPTER
17mm X 1/2" MPT
RAIN BIRD XFF-MA-050
17mm X 3/4" MPT
RAIN BIRD XFF-MA-075
PVC TEE SxSxT

PVC LATERAL SUPPLY HEADER
TIE DOWN STAKE:

RAIN BIRD TDS-050 WITH BEND (TYPICAL)

FINISH GRADE

RAIN BIRD XF SERIES BLANK TUBING

LENGTH AS REQUIRED
4"-6"
NOTES:

1. PLACE TIE DOWN STAKES EVERY THREE FEET IN SAND,
FOUR FEET IN LOAM, AND FIVE FEET IN CLAY.

2. AT FITTINGS WHERE THERE IS A CHANGE OF DIRECTION

SUCH AS TEES OR ELBOWS, USE TIE-DOWN STAKES ON
EACH LEG OF THE CHANGE OF DIRECTION.

3. SAVE YOUR HANDS. USE THE RAIN BIRD FITTINGS-TOOL
XF INSERTION TOOL FOR FITTING ASSEMBLY.

SUB-SURFACE DRIP RISER ASSEMBLY
SCALE: NTS
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 10
4 9
2 7
8 1
3 1
5 11
6 F

PRE-FABRICATED FLEXIBLE DRIPLINE

FLUSH HEADER WITH PRE-INSTALLED
SWIVEL BARB FITTINGS.

SWIVEL BARB FITTING.

FLUSH POINT WITH PVC CAP, SEE DETAIL E,
THIS SHEET.

PERIMETER OF AREA.

PERIMETER DRIPLINE PIPE TO BE INSTALLED
2"-4" FROM PERIMETER OF AREA.

BARB X BARB INSERT TEE (TYPICAL).

DRIPLINE (TYPICAL). SEE IRRIGATION
LEGEND FOR TYPE.

PRE-FABRICATED FLEXIBLE DRIPLINE

SUPPLY HEADER WITH PRE-INSTALLED
SWIVEL BARB FITTINGS.

PVC SUPPLY PIPE FROM CONTROL ZONE KIT
(SIZED TO MEET LATERAL FLOW DEMAND).
1/2" AIR RELIEF VALVE. SEE DETAIL D, THIS
SHEET. SEE NOTE #3.
2"-4" NOTES:

1. DISTANCE BETWEEN LATERAL ROWS AND EMITTER

SPACING TO BE BASED ON SOIL TYPE, PLANT MATERIALS
AND CHANGES IN ELEVATION.

2. LENGTH OF LONGEST DRIPLINE LATERAL SHOULD NOT

EXCEED THE MAXIMUM SPACING SHOWN IN THE
ACCOMPANYING TABLE.

3. AIR RELIEF VALVES ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR DRIPLINES
WITH BUILT IN CHECK VALVES.

INSET A

INSET A
OP

INSET C

INSET B
Dripline Maximum Lateral Lengths
(Feet)
Inlet Pressure psi
12" Spacing 18" Spacing
Nominal Flow (gph) Nominal Flow (gph)

0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9
20 192 136 254 215
30 289 205 402 337
40 350 248 498 416
50 397 281 573 477

INSET B

INSET C

SUB-SURFACE DRIPLINE (IRREGULAR SHAPED LAYOUT W/ FLEXIBLE QF N.T.S.

TOTAL LENGTH OF SELECTED DRIPLINE

SHOULD NOT EXCEED LENGTH SHOWN
IN TABLE.

PVC SCH 40 ELL (TYPICAL).

PVC SCH 40 RISER PIPE.

PVC SCH 40 TWIST LOCK FITTING
ADAPTER.

OPERATION INDICATOR.

INSTALL NEAR FLUSH VALVE.

PVC SCH 40 TWIST LOCK FITTING & CAP.

PVC SCH 40 BALL VALVE.

GALVANIZED TIE-DOWN STAKES.

TREE TRUNK & WATERING BASIN.

DRIPLINE SHALL NOT BE PLACED
WITHIN WATERING BASIN.

FINISH GRADE.
3" DEPTH DECORATIVE BARK MULCH
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 PRE-FABRICATED DRIPLINE HEADER)
21 1
1 1
2 23 3
4 56
7 7
7 89
11 14
1415
16 17
18 19

DRIP MANIFOLD

BURIAL DEPTH
4-6"
899
12 13
14 2
20 10
AR
10 21
G
12" MIN. 24" MIN.

HOSE BIB.

HEAVY DUTY GALVANIZED STEEL
'PUNCH-LOK' FASTENER, TWO (2)
REQUIRED.

SCH. 80 THREADED NIPPLE,
LENGTH AS REQUIRED.

FINISH GRADE.

PVC TEE OR ELL.

PVC MAINLINE.
#4 X 36" GALVANIZED REBAR
STAKE.

STAKED HOSE BIB
N.T.S.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
o-----
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 01-------
g ~ o ;O 0
~ - ~
~ J!i~g
0 I 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 8
0 0
o-----
0 0
0 0
0 o-----
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Ot--------
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 AHLIN

REVISIONS
JOB NO.

DRAWN
CHECK
SHEET

SEAL / SIGNATURE
5865 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-251-7200

CONSULTANT
700 Ygnacio Valley Rd.

Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
tel: 925.274.1305
855 Bordeaux Way
Suite 240
Napa, CA 94558
tel: 707.224.2299
2295 Gateway Oaks Dr.

Suite 125
Sacramento, CA 95833
tel: 916.244.3000
1648.001

THE MERIDIAN
3941 STEVENS CREEK

SANTA CLARA, CA

THIRD PLANNING

DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL

12.17.2021
04721VTA NO.

IRRIGATION

DETAILS
L-8.3


A
2"-4"

INSET A

INSET BINSET C

PRE-FABRICATED FLEXIBLE

DRIPLINE FLUSH HEADER WITH

PRE-INSTALLED SWIVEL BARB
FITTINGS.

SWIVEL BARB FITTING.

FLUSH POINT WITH PVC CAP, SEE
DETAIL E, SHEET L-10.2.

PERIMETER OF AREA.

PERIMETER DRIPLINE PIPE TO BE
INSTALLED 2"-4" FROM PERIMETER OF
AREA.

DRIPLINE (TYPICAL). SEE IRRIGATION
LEGEND FOR TYPE.

PRE-FABRICATED FLEXIBLE

DRIPLINE SUPPLY HEADER WITH

PRE-INSTALLED SWIVEL BARB
FITTINGS.

PVC DRIP MANIFOLD FROM CONTROL

ZONE VALVE KIT (SIZED TO MEET
LATERAL FLOW DEMAND).

PVC SCH 40 ELL (TYPICAL).

NOTES:

1. DISTANCE BETWEEN LATERAL ROWS AND EMITTER SPACING

TO BE BASED ON SOIL TYPE, PLANT MATERIALS AND
CHANGES IN ELEVATION.

2. LENGTH OF LONGEST DRIPLINE LATERAL SHOULD NOT

EXCEED THE MAXIMUM SPACING SHOWN IN THE
ACCOMPANYING TABLE.

3. AIR RELIEF VALVES ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR DRIPLINES
WITH BUILT IN CHECK VALVES.

INSET B

INSET C
Dripline Maximum Lateral Lengths
(Feet)
Inlet Pressure psi
12" Spacing 18" Spacing
Nominal Flow (gph) Nominal Flow (gph)

0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9
20 192 136 254 215
30 289 205 402 337
40 350 248 498 416
50 397 281 573 477

SUB-SURFACE DRIPLINE (END FEED LAYOUT W/ FLEXIBLE QF
N.T.S.PRE-FABRICATED DRIPLINE HEADER)
1 2
4 5
6 7
8 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
3 PVC SCH 40 RISER PIPE.

PVC SCH 40 TWIST LOCK FITTING
ADAPTER.

PVC SCH 40 TWIST LOCK FITTING
& CAP.

PVC SCH 40 BALL VALVE.

OPERATION INDICATOR. SEE
DETAIL X, SHEET L-X.X. INSTALL
NEAR FLUSH VALVE.

GALVANIZED TIE-DOWN STAKES.

TREE TRUNK & WATERING BASIN.

DRIPLINE SHALL NOT BE PLACED
WITHIN WATERING BASIN.

TOTAL LENGTH OF SELECTED

DRIPLINE SHOULD NOT EXCEED
LENGTH SHOWN IN TABLE.

FINISH GRADE.
3" DEPTH DECORATIVE BARK
MULCH.
1/2" AIR RELIEF VALVE, SEE
DETAIL D, SHEET L-10.2. SEE
NOTE #3.
9 OP
19 1
1 2
2 4
5 6
6 6
7 7
8 1113
12 14
20 16
17 3

INSET A

DRIP MANIFOLD

BURIAL DEPTH
2 8 8 711
9 10
4-6"
18 AR
20 1119
15 B
1NOTES:

PROVIDE EMITTER OUTLETS & NUMBER OF
DISTRIBUTION TUBING AS FOLLOWS:
1 GALLON SHRUB - (1) - 1 GPH
5 GALLON SHRUB - (2) - 1 GPH
15 GALLON SHRUB/TREES - (4) - 1 GPH

MULTI-OUTLET PRESSURE
COMPENSATING EMITTER. SEE
LEGEND FOR TYPE.
6" EMITTER BOX. SEE LEGEND FOR
TYPE.
1/4 " DISTRIBUTION TUBING AND BUG
CAP. DISTANCE FROM MULTI-OUTLET

HEAD TO IRRIGATION DISTRIBUTION
POINT TO BE A MAXIMUM OF 5'-0".

TUBING STAKE

FINISH GRADE

MICROSPRAY ON POLYFLEX RISER
(LENGTH AS NEEDED). SEE LEGEND
FOR TYPE.

PEA GRAVEL
SCH 80 PVC RISER
SCH 40 SST TEE

PVC LATERAL PIPE

BRICK SUPPORTS
6 5 123
4 8
9 11
10 11
7 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12" MIN.

N.T.S.

MULTI-OUTLET EMITTER
C

PVC LATERAL PIPE

PVC TEE OR ELL
DISTRIBUTION TUBING W/ BUG CAP.

SEE NOTE #2.

MULTI-OUTLET EMITTER IN VALVE BOX
PER DETAIL B, THIS SHEET. SEE TYPE
PER LEGEND.

SHRUB PLANTING
NOTES:

1. PROVIDE EMITTER OUTLETS & NUMBER OF DISTRIBUTION TUBING AS FOLLOWS:
1 GALLON SHRUB - (1) - 1 GPH
5 GALLON SHRUB - (2) - 1 GPH
15 GALLON SHRUB/TREES - (4) - 1GPH

2. DISTANCE FROM MULTI-OUTLET HEAD TO IRRIGATION DISTRIBUTION POINT TO BE A MAX. OF 5'-0".

3. LAYOUT OF LATERAL PIPE AND MULTI-OUTLET MANIFOLD VARIES PER SHRUB LOCATIONS AND DENSITY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES AND DETERMINE FINAL LOCATIONS.
5'-0" MAXTYP.1
2 3
4 5
VARIES
VARIES
2 1
3 4
5 MULTI-OUTLET EMITTER LAYOUT
N.T.S.

WATER USE CALCULATIONS
SCALE: N.T.S.D
0 0
0 0
0 0 ,-.------
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o-----
AHLIN
V\ 0
0 0
0 0
0 City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-1672 Agenda Date: 1/25/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Update on Discussions with Parking Maintenance District No. 122 - Franklin Square (PMD 122) Property Owners Regarding Council’s Request to Explore Increased Contributions for Operations and Maintenance Costs

COUNCIL PILLAR
Deliver and Enhance High Quality Efficient Services and Infrastructure

BACKGROUND
Parking Maintenance District No. 122 (PMD 122) was formed in 1965 for the parking lots, arcades, fountains, sidewalks, landscaping, irrigation, lights, and utilities within Franklin Square, which is bounded by Benton Street, Homestead Road (formerly known as Liberty Street), Monroe Street, and Jackson Street. There have been several changes in how maintenance and operations costs have been collected over the years and in 2002 the City Council passed a motion at a public hearing in which the City assumed all future costs for operation and maintenance and in May 2003 adopted Resolution 7026. Under the collection method contained in Resolution 7026, the property owners contribute annually to pay for capital repairs of the parking lot and associated walkways. The fixed annual contribution from the property owners totals $14,200, less the earned interest on the accumulating balance. The accumulated balance in the account is $144,887 as of October 2021.

The City, through the General Fund, is responsible for covering the costs for annual maintenance and operations of PMD 122 and that has continued to be the arrangement through the present day. In FY 2021/22, the City budgeted $138,163 to cover the day-to-day maintenance of PMD 122.

On several occasions Council has discussed the allocation of PMD 122 costs because the City pays for all of the day-to-day maintenance and there was sentiment by some members of the Council that the property owners should pay some of these costs, similar to how PMD 122 was funded prior to 2003. On May 4, 2021, Council directed staff to engage PMD 122 property owners and discuss opportunities for reallocating operations and maintenance costs more equitably between the City and property owners since costs have increased since 2003. Later in this report, the State law process for administering PMD 122 is provided but, in short, any change requires a favorable voter outcome of those impacted by the assessment. It should be noted that regardless of changes to the funding allocations in the PMD, the City is responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of the City-owned improvements at Franklin Square. Absent changes to the funding allocations, only changes to the level of service of upkeep and maintenance could reduce the City’s share of the annual maintenance cost.

DISCUSSION
Staff developed a plan to implement this request which included property owner coordination and City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/20/2022Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™
22-1672 Agenda Date: 1/25/2022
engagement, a survey, and follow up with Council.

Property Owner Engagement July 2021
All PMD 122 property owners were contacted and invited to a virtual meeting on July 12, 2021. At this meeting, staff summarized the background of the past and current PMD 122 cost sharing arrangements and the direction from the Council to engage property owners to see if they are amenable to paying a portion of the operations and maintenance costs which have risen over the last 19 years. The property owners conveyed some of their concerns about PMD 122 and were encouraged to propose funding alternatives for consideration and ask questions. A copy of the minutes from the July 12 meeting was distributed to all the property owners following the meeting and can be viewed in Attachment 1.

Survey
Following the meeting, staff developed a series of survey questions designed to gauge property owners’ amenability to contributing to the annual maintenance. In general, the purpose of the survey was to gauge the property owners’ willingness to shift a portion of the PMD 122 operations and maintenance costs to the property owners. A virtual meeting was scheduled for October 21, 2021 to review the draft survey questions with the property owners to ensure that everyone understood the questions and to receive suggestions prior to finalizing the survey and sending it out. Prior to the meeting, the City was contacted by David DeLozier who indicated that the property owners had been discussing this item and were not in support of changing the current cost allocations included in PMD 122. Mr. DeLozier indicated that the property owners would be submitting a petition that would also include the merchants.

Property Owner and Merchant Petition
The property owners and merchants circulated a petition for no changes to PMD 122, which was signed by all the property owners and most of the merchants. The signed petition (Attachment 2) was submitted to staff on October 19, 2021 which made it clear that a survey was not necessary to gauge PMD property owners’ interest in financially contributing to operations and maintenance.

Property Owner Engagement October 2021
All PMD 122 property owners were contacted and invited to a virtual meeting on October 21, 2021.

The initial purpose of the meeting was to review proposed survey questions developed by staff to ensure that the property owners understood the questions and to get their input to see if any of the language needed to be modified to make the questions more clear. At the end of the meeting it was determined that due to the petition from the property owners, there was no need to proceed with the survey. Staff discussed next steps with the property owners in attendance and indicated a report would be prepared for Council at a meeting to take place in early 2022. A copy of the minutes from the October 21 meeting can be viewed in Attachment 3.

During prior meetings, Council had raised questions about the procedures for modifying and dissolving PMD 122. Staff has included the information on both of those processes below.

Process for Modifications to PMD 122
Any decision by the Council to increase the assessment (e.g., to increase the property owners’ share of operation, maintenance, and capital costs or to modify the formula used to calculate the amount of the assessment levied on any individual parcel) must follow the assessment balloting procedure required by Proposition 218. That procedure consists of three basic steps:

City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/20/2022Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™
22-1672 Agenda Date: 1/25/2022
(1) Notice to Property Owners - Mailed notice of the proposed modification to the 11 property owners within PMD 122. The notice must contain the following information: the total amount to be assessed across PMD 122; the amount chargeable to each parcel individually; the duration of the payments; the basis upon which the assessment was calculated; the date, time, and location of the public hearing on the proposed modification; and a ballot on which the owner can indicate support for or opposition to the proposed modification. (2) Public Hearing - At least 45 days after the date of the mailed notice, the Council must hold a public hearing to consider protests and tabulate the ballots on the proposed assessment. (3) Ballot Tabulation - Ballots are weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. For PMD 122, the assessments are calculated based on the gross floor area of the building(s) on each parcel and therefore the ballots would be weighted accordingly.

If the ballots submitted in opposition exceed the ballots submitted in support, then the City may not impose the modified assessment.

Process for Dissolving PMD 122
Proposition 218 does not govern the dissolution of PMD 122 because dissolution has the effect of eliminating, rather than increasing, the assessment. Therefore, only the City Code and Streets and Highways Code would apply. Under those laws, dissolution is not subject to the approval of property owners within the district. The Council can dissolve the maintenance district by: (1) adopting a resolution of intention to dissolve the district; (2) between 10 and 30 days later, conducting a public hearing on the dissolution; and, (3) adopting a resolution dissolving the district. A resolution dissolving the district would only need a simple Council majority to pass. If Council votes to dissolve PMD 122, extraordinary maintenance activities can continue to utilize PMD 122 assessment funds until the balance is exhausted. After the funds are exhausted the City would be required to fund the extraordinary maintenance in its entirety.

Staff notes that as a practical matter, dissolution would merely eliminate the property owners’ assessments as a funding source for capital improvement costs. Dissolution would not relieve the City’s responsibility for upkeep and maintenance of the City-owned improvements at the Franklin Square Mall. As such, the Council direction to determine how property owners pay more for services offered through PMD 122 would not be achieved.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action being considered does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(a) as it has no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

COORDINATION
This report has been coordinated with the City Attorney’s Office.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City’s official-notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City’s website City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/20/2022Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™
22-1672 Agenda Date: 1/25/2022
and in the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting. A hard copy of any agenda report may be requested by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 615-2220, email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> .

RECOMMENDATION
Note and file this informational report.

Reviewed by: Craig Mobeck, Director of Public Works
Approved by: Deanna J. Santana, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. July 12, 2021 minutes from meeting with PMD 122 property owners

2. Signed petition

3. October 21, 2021 minutes for meeting with PMD 122 property owners City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/20/2022Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™
1 PARKING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 122 (PMD 122)

VIRTUAL MEETING WITH PROPERTY OWNERS

MINUTES

Date: 07/12/21 Monday
Time: 5:00 PM

City Attendees:

Dave Staub, Deputy Director of Public Works
Craig Mobeck, Director of Public Works
Lourdes Marasigan, Staff Aide I

Property Owner Attendees:

David DeLozier (APN 269-22-098)
Gia Vitarelli (APN 269-22-100, 269-22-101)
Bob Freitas (APN 269-22-104)
Lisa Gillmor (APN 269-22-113, 269-22-114, 269-22-115)

1. Introductions - All Attendees

2. Background
Prior to 2002, the property owners paid 75% of the annual maintenance costs and the City paid 25%.Under the current cost sharing arrangement the City is responsible for 100% of the annual operations and maintenance (O&M) costs and the property owners pay $14,200 less accrued interest from the prior toward capital repairs for PMD 122 pursuant to a Council determination on July 9, 2002 and subsequent Resolution No. 7041, which was adopted by Council on May 6, 2003.

On May 4, 2021 Council approved the Resolution of Intention to levy the alternative method of assessment for the PMD 122, after it failed to pass on April 20. Council indicated that At the May 4 meeting, also Council directed staff to engage the property owners to see if they are amenable to paying a portion of the operations and maintenance costs to help cover costs that have risen over the previous 19 years.

On June 22, Council approved the Resolution directing staff to proceed with the preparing assessments using the methodology approved in 2002. The property owners will be assessed $10,561, with accrued interest in the amount of $3,639 covering the balance of the $14,200 assessment for FY 2021/22. It is projected that the interest bearing account containing property owner assessments contains $146,000

Below are links to the Council meeting agendas that PMD 122 was recently discussed under the Public Hearing section of the agenda. The videos for the meeting can also be accessed on the City’s website.

June 22 Council Agenda

May 4 Council Agenda
April 20 Council Agenda

3. Property Owner Concerns
• The two parking lots are the only real benefit to the property owners 2 • The City chose to add improvements that elevated the O&M costs in the early 2000’s that were not requested by the property owners
• The U.S. Post Office receives the most benefit, but is not included in the maintenance district
• The parking lots are used by Post Office customers, Farmer’s Market customers and other public uses that don’t necessarily benefit the tenants • Why would the property owners agree to pay more for the same level of maintenance • Any additional property owner assessments will be passed on to tenants who are already struggling due to COVID-19
• Property owners are already struggling to keep tenants • City should be supporting small businesses not raising their costs of doing business • Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) should pay a portion of maintenance because it benefits
• Current PMD 122 grounds look shabby
• Concerns for safety around PMD 122 with recent rise in crime • Fountains should be operational

4. Alternatives for Consideration
a. Assessments based on land area of Franklin Square (36% buildings / 64% landscape/parking lots)
b. Develop option in which property owners pay only for O&M of parking lots (contracted street sweeping and City contract administration)
c. Develop option in which property owners pay for annual concrete and asphalt power washing to improve the appearance of the grounds

5. Dissolution of PMD 122
a. Council inquired about the process and ramifications b. City would still be the property owner of the landscaped areas and parking lots, while property owners would still own the buildings
c. City would be responsible for 100% of O&M costs, as well as the capital repair costs of the parking lots and interior walkways
d. City has discretion to set levels of service

6. Next Steps
a. Staff to take property owner feed back and develop an informational survey to gauge property owners willingness to shift a portion of the PMD 122 O&M costs to the property owners
b. Follow-up meeting will be scheduled to review the survey questions and upcoming process before the surveys are to be submitted
c. Staff to prepare an informational report to the City Council summarizing discussions and survey results – Staff will not be making any recommendations d. City Council direction will dictate any future actions, if any are necessary

7. Questions from Property Owners
a. Question: Do any of the City’s fountains run on recycled water, and if not why don’t we move to retrofit?
Answer: No, all of the City’s fountains use potable water. A retrofit is not being considered because of the costs associated with running a recycled water pipeline to connect PMD 122.

3 b. Question: What is the process to make any changes to assessment allocations? Answer: The City would have to follow the process required by Proposition 218. • Property owners would receive a notice of public hearing and a ballot • Votes would be weighted by square footage owned by each property owners • In order for any increased assessment to pass, the number of ballots submitted in favor must exceed the number of ballots submitted in opposition o Based on relative weight of votes received
o Ballots not submitted do not count in favor or opposition o Simple majority of ballots received in favor needed to pass

c. Question: What type of notice can be expected?
Answer: It is Staff’s intent to keep the property owners engaged and informed throughout this process. Staff will set-up a 2
nd meeting to go over the survey questions to make sure that it is clear. Staff will inform the property owners of the date that the informational report that summarizes the engagement of property owners on the topic of shifting O&M costs. Finally, the City would be required to provide property owners with a Notice of Public Hearing and a ballot, in advance of taking any action to increase assessments. 10/12/2021
To whom it may concern,
We, the landlords and merchants of the Franklin Mall / Franklin Square do hereby petition for no changes to the Parking Maintenance Distract# 122. The City of Santa Clara and landlords/Merchants will abide by the July 2002 agreement and resolution for that Parking Maintenance district# 122 which was reached in good faith between the parties.
10/12/2021
To whom it may concern,
We, the landlords and merchants of the Franklin Mall / Franklin Square do hereby petition for no changes to the Parking Maintenance Distract# 122. The City of Santa Clara and landlords/Merchants will abide by the July 2002 agreement and resolution for that Parking Maintenance district # 122 which was reached in good faith between the parties.

Name and Address of Owners /Merchant
/n1.IA.l .J-' /osl r1?.onroe- s/--,
l_!_'iV""'~':) C , 'S.o.01--r{_ ~ {A C/S-05
~~d ·;,;;;.,...;;...~_..;;.;._~;....__~~~~~----'-~~~-~-'-'-2-.1 (Jnvui~
(~ /Y):;., ► en
10/12/2021
To whom it may concern,
We, the landlords and merchants of the Franklin Mall / Franklin Square do hereby petition for no changes to the Parking Maintenance Distract# 122. The City of Santa Clara and landlords/Merchants will abide by the July 2002 agreement and resolution for that Parking Maintenance district # 122 which was reached in good faith between the parties.
~~mi:'W~~1£~s of Owners /Merchant Sig~ature __ ~ 11 Dat~ (!:v;(),fo1 ➔ tJ~~1 +f)J;v1-t...'}SWQ.N§oNC~ Oc-+-~02'1 10/12/2021
To whom it may concern,
We, the landlords and merchants of the Franklin Mall / Franklin Square do hereby petition for no changes to the Parking Maintenance Distract# 122. The City of Santa Clara and landlords/Merchants will abide by the July 2002 agreement and resolution for that Parking Maintenance district #122 which was reached in good faith between the parties.

Name and Address of Owners /Merchant Signature
R~~/J.o -lle.amo.s;11" (/114f - r 51 - -=,5~ -7~s-J1,pl(/~ ~r:
~
10/12/2021
To whom it may concern,
We, the landlords and merchants of the Franklin Mall / Franklin Square do hereby petition for no changes to the Parking Maintenance Distract# 122. The City of Santa Clara and landlords/Merchants will abide by the July 2002 agreement and resolution for that Parking Maintenance district # 122 which was reached in good faith between the parties.

Name and Address of Owners /Merchan
O'u"4 + t.A1iAPz,~lktti1,di11,J ?ll~t
.5 1
10/12/2021
To whom it may concern,
We, the landlords and merchants of the Franklin Mall / Franklin Square do hereby petition for no changes to the Parking Maintenance Distract# 122. The City of Santa Clara and landlords/Merchants will abide by the July 2002 agreement and resolution for that Parking Maintenance district# 122 which was reached in good faith between the parties.

Date
~~~~~-~~~~~~'1 ~
10/12/2021
To whom it may concern,
We, the landlords and merchants of the Franklin Mall / Franklin Square do hereby petition for no changes to the Parking Maintenance Distract# 122. The City of Santa Clara and landlords/Merchants will abide by the July 2002 agreement and resolution for that Parking Maintenance district #122 which was reached in good faith between the parties.

Name and Address of Owners /Merchant Dat 0
~ .+ / 7·t_J .....!.. ....... ,;.;.__......1,,_.;......:....L,....;..i,..ll,i,,li----r,......:;;;a..i...ii::..,<:;..__-+..w::;...i~~.....,.;;:;._......,.;.i.,.------+- -i.),'M-::,~:-{J'Jf
10/12/2021
To whom it may oncern,
We, the landlords and merchants of the Franklin Mall / Franklin Square do hereby petition for no cha ges to the Parking Maintenance Distract# 122. The City of Santa Clara and landlor s/Merchants will abide by the July 2002 agreement and resolution for that Parking Mkintenance district #122 which was reached in good faith between the parties.
ame an res )0 wners ere ant /Ji, 1rt.nature ae
hc.e__ fl),-1 - U1tv... c:.A.im Io~ 3 f'l/c,-,,u. ~ !C -b~ .2t7~J.2 ·102 K dAdd fO /M h D t
,,.,,,.. .i..---,- j
PMD 122 Teams Meeting Minutes
Thursday, October 21, 2021

City Attendees: Craig Mobeck, Department of Public Works Director Dave Staub, Department of Public Works Deputy Director
Lourdes Marasigan, Staff Aide I

Property Owner Attendees:

Dave DeLozier
Nancy Vitarelli
Gia Vitarelli

1. Brief Recap/Background on Property Owners’ Survey

2. Discussion
a. Dave Staub confirms receipt of signed petitions from 100% of the property owners which the Department will provide to the Council. b. Dave DeLozier confirms that he received the signed petition from the last property owner via email today, which now makes 100% of the property owners signed petitions.
c. Dave Staub confirms that there is no need to proceed any further with the property owners’ definitive response from the signed petitions from all the property owners.
d. Craig Mobeck summarizes the next steps that the Department will be taking and will be reporting to Council.
e. Dave DeLozier provides feedback from the tenant regarding problems in the Franklin Square and also added the maintenance concerns of the landscaping in/around the Franklin Square mall.
f. Nancy Vitarelli reported that the bushes in the parking lot needs to be maintained and for the City to shave the concrete in front of their building which is by the dry cleaners/in front of Giovanni’s.
g. Dave DeLozier thanks the staff and reiterates that he understands the staff and what process the staff have to go through for the Council.

For Staff:

1. Accella Request # 11009754 – concrete shaving
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-87 Agenda Date: 1/25/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Update on City Council and Stadium Authority Staff Referrals

COUNCIL PILLAR
Enhance Community Engagement and Transparency

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
During Council and Stadium Authority meetings, the City Council or Stadium Authority Board provide direction on policy issues or refer information requests to staff for follow-up.

The purpose of the City Council and Stadium Authority Referrals Update is to provide the City Council/Stadium Authority Board and the public a current status report. Completion of the referrals may be communicated by various means such as: Report to Council, Information Memorandum provided through a Council Agenda, City Manager Biweekly Report/Blog, or a City Manager/Executive report out during a future Council meeting.

The Referrals list will be published in the Council agenda packet under the “City Manager/Executive Director Report” section of the Council Agenda. Reports will include both open and closed referrals.

ATTACHMENTS

1. City Council and Stadium Authority Staff Referrals
City of Santa Clara Printed on 1/20/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
CITY COUNCIL AND STADIUM AUTHORITY STAFF REFERRALS
FOR FOLLOW‐UP/ACTION
Updated 1/20/22
Date
Assigned
Source Referral Description Assigned
Department
Projected
Completion
Completed

1. 1/11/22 Council Meeting Action on a Written Petition (Council Policy 030) submitted by Keith Stattenfield requesting to place an agenda item at a future Council meeting to discuss requirements from the CAO on approving an update to the CC&Rs of the Case del Rey HOA Bylaws
CAO TBD

2. 1/11/22 Council Meeting Update on Review and Monitoring of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Measures. Staff to Issue RFP to Support online reporting and tracking of TDM Measures and Present a Template to Complete the Forms
DPW TBD

3. 1/11/22 Council Meeting Action on a Council Written Request (Council Policy 030) submitted by CM Jain requesting to place an agenda item at a future Council Meeting to discuss making the Youth Soccer Park parking lot available when there are no events at the Youth Soccer Park

1. Investigate ADA Improvements for parking

2. Investigate whether the City can engage a private ope rator to manage for parking

3. Investigate whether the 49ers can use their practice facility for parking

4. Determine the fair market value of VIP parking
Parks &
Rec/CAO
TBD

4. 1/5/22 Joint City/VTA Study
Session re: BART to Santa
Clara

1. Set a meeting with VTA near the proposed Santa Clara BART Station location to provide details to the public regarding station design (tentatively scheduled for 3/22/22)

2. Funding a Brokaw undergrounding study for February 8, 2022 Priority Setting Session
DPW March 22, 2022

5. 12/14/21 Council Meeting Action on Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for the Performance of Services with Wilson, Ihrig & Associates for Noise Monitoring Services at Vantage CA2 Data Center and Owens Corning Facility and Related Budget Amendment: item continued to get more information on broadcasting, moving from the Northside to the stadium, and an implemen
tation timeline
CDD February 22,
2022

6. 12/14/21 Council Meeting Defer Loyalton to future meeting to develop strategy for the sale of the property; staff to coordinate a visit to the property for interested Councilmembers CMO/SVP TBD

7. 12/7/21 Council Meeting Written Petition (030) to be added to Future Agenda:
10A: Action on a Written Petition (Council Policy 030) Submitted by Jared Peters Requesting to Place an Agenda Item at a Future Council Meeting to Consider making a Policy Decision Regarding the City Assuming Responsibility of an Unstable and Dangerous Sound Wall in the Laurel Park East Neighborhood DPW March 8,
2022

8. 12/7/21 Council Meeting Written Petition (030) to be added to 2022 Priority Setting Session Agenda: CMO 2022 Priority Cityof
Santa Clara
The Center of What's Possible

SCSA -------SANTA CLARA STADIUM AUTHORITY
CITY COUNCIL AND STADIUM AUTHORITY STAFF REFERRALS
FOR FOLLOW‐UP/ACTION
Updated 1/20/22
Date
Assigned
Source Referral Description Assigned
Department
Projected
Completion
Completed
10C: Action on a Council Written Request (Council Policy 030) Submitted by Councilmember Jain Requesting to Place an Agenda Item at a Future Council Meeting to Consider a Neighborhood Stadium Relations Committee Setting Session

9. 11/16/21 Council Meeting Refer a Potential Quiet Zone Policy to the 2022 Goal Setting Session on February 8 and direct staff to research any funding sources available before the meeting DPW 2022 Council
Priority Setting
Session

10. 11/16/21 Council Meeting Refer the Vision Zero Policy to the Goal Setting Session in February 2022 and return to Council with a funding source in the amount of $315K prior to the priority setting session – potential funding source identified before Priority Setting) DPW/Finance 2022 Council
Priority Setting
Session

11. 11/16/21 Council Meeting Consider Resolution to support the bid to FIFA for the 2026 World Cup and related events.

CMO/CAO March 8, 2022

12. 11/9/21 Council Meeting Project Homekey: Look for alternate site in Santa Clara better suited for this use; issue Request for Proposal (RFP) for basic hygiene resources for unhoused population, including bathrooms, showers, and laundry services.

CDD Contract for
services on
1/25/22 agenda.

Alternate site
2022 TBD

13. 10/26/21 Council Meeting Item 4: Presentation on Business Tax Ballot Measure and Other Potential Revenue Measures for November 2022 Ballot: Explore a business tax that strikes a balance with the value of a business‐friendly city (key priority) and progressive tax with input and advice of a consultant.

CMO/Finance 2022 Priority
Setting Session

14. 10/19/21 Council Meeting Written Petition (CP 030) regarding 1601 Civic Center Drive to be added to a future meeting agenda.

CDD/CMO Spring 2022

15. 10/19/21 Council Meeting Discussion of New City Hall into New Santa Clara Downtown Plan at the 2022 Priority Setting Session
CDD 2022 Priority
Setting Session

16. 10/19/21 Council Meeting Discussion of Proposal of a New City Film Commission at the 2022 Priority Setting Session
CMO 2022 Priority
Setting Session

17. 10/19/21 Council Meeting Discussion of Construction of Lawn Bowl Facility for consideration at the 2022 Priority Setting Session
Parks &
Rec/CMO
2022 Priority
Setting Session

18. 10/19/21 Council Meeting Discussion of Future Ballot Measure Discussion in 2022 for Infrastructure Bond or Tax to 2022 Priority Setting Session
CDD/City
Attorney/Finan
ce
2022 Priority
Setting Session

19. 10/19/21 Council Meeting Discussion of Rainbow Crosswalk Painting to 2022 Priority Setting Session (unless actions occur prior)
DPW/CMO 2022 Priority
Setting Session
Cityof
Santa Clara
The Center of What's Possible

20. 9/28/21 Council Meeting Approve staff recommendation for Item 6. Public Hearing: 2020‐2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) with changes to increase grant funding to $30,000 for 7 agencies and fund the remaining 4 from the City’s General Fund.

Community
Development/
Housing
May 2022

21. 9/28/21 Council Meeting Refer the following Written Petition submitted by Councilmember Jain to the City Attorney’s Office for review, prior to being heard by the Governance Committee:
10 B. Request to Place an Agenda Item at a Future Meeting to Consider Hiring an Ethics Consultant for Upcoming Elections
Requested that the City Attorney’s Office provide an update to Council on fi ndings.

City Attorney 2022

22. 9/7/21 Council Meeting Agendize Written Petition submitted by David Donaldson to a future Council Agenda to Consider Placing a Ballot Measure on the 2022 Ballot for Charter Amendments calling for the voters to consider Campaign Reform actions relative to donations from Santa Clara businesses and residents, City matching funds for donations, funding caps, and disc
losures of funding raising activities. The
component regarding Mayor and Council salaries will be removed. Directed staff to return with a comparison of what other cities do.

City Clerk/City
Attorney
2022 Priority
Setting Session

23. 9/7/21 Council Meeting Shorten term of amendment to the agreement for the performance of services with Wilson, Ihrig & Associates for Noise Monitoring Services at Levi’s Stadium from 18 months to 6 months and directed staff to return with a proposal for owning versus leasing equipment and the cost benefit for monitoring the noise dat a and quality of reporting.

CDD March 2022

24. 8/24/21 Council Meeting
(Study Session)
Directed staff to:
 Engage with HomeBase to design City Plan Framework and start prep for workgroup discussions ‐ added to 1/25/22 agenda
 Fast‐track Task Force/Housing Commission development and implementation – added to 1/25/22 agenda for Council approval  Fast‐track HomeKey progress where possible, especially in enti tlements processing
 Explore short‐term basic services, including bathrooms, showers, laundry, cell phone charging and others – Contract for services added to 1/25/22 agenda
CDD/City Clerk/
City Attorney/
Police
2022

25. 8/17/21 Council Meeting (Priority Implement pilot meeting management protocol for Council meetings City Attorney 2022 Priority Cityof
Santa Clara
The Center of What's Possible

SCSA -------SANTA CLARA STADIUM AUTHORITY
CITY COUNCIL AND STADIUM AUTHORITY STAFF REFERRALS
FOR FOLLOW‐UP/ACTION
Updated 1/20/22
Date
Assigned
Source Referral Description Assigned
Department
Projected
Completion
Completed
Setting Check‐in) recommended by the Mayor and revisit/assess at 2022 Priority Setting Session in January/February 2022. City Attorney to return to Council with resolution outlining this process.

Setting Session

26. 8/17/21 Council Meeting (Priority
Setting Check‐in)
Staff to return at a future Council meeting with draft ordinance to adopt recommended procurement reforms
Finance Early 2022

27. 8/17/21 Council Meeting (Priority
Setting Check‐in)
Direct staff to bring back on a future agenda a presentation on Councilmember conflict of interest, including what staff currently does and what the Council is responsible for
City Manager/
City Attorney
TBD

28. 6/15/21 Council Meeting Request to provide date‐based search capability on City website IT/City Manager
February 2022

29. 5/4/21 Council Meeting Parking Maintenance District No. 122 – Engage with property owners to discuss options for increasing their share of the annual O&M costs and potential for dissolving the district – Update for Council is scheduled on 1/25/22 Public Works February 2022

30. 2/23/21 Council Meeting Return with information in 6 months on a cost analysis on City’s undertaking of responsibility of sewer laterals on and options for potential grant program and/or insurance policies
Water & Sewer 2022 Priority
Setting Session

31. 1/12/21 Council Meeting Defer approval of the 1205 Coleman Gateway neighborhood park design to work with the developer within current project approvals to receive additional community input including the Old Quad on park design
Parks & Rec Spring 2022

32. 1/12/21 Council Meeting Provide a Study Session on pros/cons lifecycle cost/benefits of artificial surfacing including turf (staff will return to Council with an Information Memo) Parks & Rec Summer 2022

33. 10/13/20 Council Meeting Community Benefits Policy – Return to the Governance Committee with potential models of a Community Benefits Policy with feedback from various Community groups (i.e., CatalyzeSV) and best practices from other Cities Community
Development
Spring 2022

34. 9/24/19 Council Meeting Staff to review the Ordinance and enforcement of illegal street food vendors. At the 9/25/20 Council meeting, Council asked staff to review enforcement of vendors outside of Levi’s Stadium
Police Summer 2022

35. 4/30/19 Council Meeting Number of public transit riders for large stadium events 49ers Stadium Manager
TBD

36. 4/30/19 Council Meeting Ask Stadium Manager for analysis to support their position that reducing the cost of parking would likely adversely impact public transit ridership, resulting in more cars on the roads
49ers Stadium
Manager
TBD

37. 10/2/18 Council Meeting Amend sign ordinance to prohibit signs on publ ic property Parks & Rec/ TBD Cityof
Santa Clara
The Center of What's Possible

37. 3/13/18 Council Meeting Develop a Stadium Authority Financial Reporting Policy in conjunction with the Stadium Authority Auditor and the external auditor
Finance Early 2022
Cityof
Santa Clara
The Center of What's Possible

SCSA -------SANTA CLARA STADIUM AUTHORITY
COMPLETED 2021‐2022
CITY COUNCIL AND STADIUM AUTHORITY STAFF REFERRALS
Updated 1/20/22
Date
Assigned
Source Referral Description Assigned
Department
Projected
Completion
Completed Resolution

1. 8/17/21 Council Meeting
(Priority Setting
Check‐In)
Directed staff to return to Council at a future date with changes to the eligibility for serving on City Commissions that expands the eligibility requirement from Santa Clara electorate to Santa Clara resident – deferred to December
City Attorney 12/7/21 1/11/22 Approved by Council
at 1/11/22 Council
Meeting

2. 8/17/21 Council Meeting
(Priority Setting
Check‐in)
Direct staff to explore a consultant for a TDM Study (scope, cost, ongoing cost) and talk to other cities and gather anything that may be able to be shared
CDD 12/14/21 1/11/22 Reported at Council
Meeting

3. 10/19/21 Council Meeting Direct staff to place a future agenda item to adopt a resolution urging Santa Clara County to reject use permit to preserve Juristac as open space.

CDD 12/14/21 12/14/21 Council Adopted
Resolution at
12/14/21 Council
Meeting

4. 8/17/21 Council Meeting Continue Item 4: Discussion on Consideration of the Sale of the Loyalton Ranch Property, subject to receiving a memo from City Attorney and to also include information on the Surplus Land Act process.

City Attorney/
SVP
12/14/21 12/14/21 Reported at Council
Meeting

5. 9/28/21 Council Meeting
Study Session
Include protection of all historical preservation resources as part of the preferred framework plan for the Downtown Precise Plan (DPP).

Community
Development
October 2022 12/3/21 Reported in City
Manager’s Bi‐
Weekly Report

6. 9/28/21 Council Meeting Continue Item 8. Action on the Introduction of an All‐Electric Reach Code Ordinance, including Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging, that Amends Chapter

15.36 (Energy Code) and Chapter 15.38 (Green Building Code) of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Santa Clara Municipal Code, to the Council meeting on October 19.

SVP/Public
Works/
Community
Development
Octob
er 2021 11/16/21 Reported at Council
Meeting

7. 8/17/21 Council Meeting
(Priority Setting
Check‐in)
Schedule a Transportation Study Session that includes discussion of Vision Zero Policy and “Quiet Zone.” Note: on 11/16/21 Council referred this topic to 2022 Priority Setting and directed staff to research and report on any funding sources
Public Works 11/16/21 11/16/21 Study Session heard
at Council Meeting

8. 10/9/18 Council Meeting Dedicate Jerry Marsalli Community Center at grand opening of the facility Parks & Rec 11/6/21 11/6/21 Ceremony Held

9. 9/28/21 Council Meeting Refer the following Written Petitions submitted by Councilmember Jain to the Governance Committee for review:

CMO 2022 11/1/21 Added to 2022 Draft
Governance &
Cityof
Santa Clara
The Center of What's Possible
SCSA

SANTA CLARA STADIUM AUTHORITY
COMPLETED 2021‐2022
CITY COUNCIL AND STADIUM AUTHORITY STAFF REFERRALS
Updated 1/20/22
Date
Assigned
Source Referral Description Assigned
Department
Projected
Completion
Completed Resolution
10 C. Request to Place an Agenda Item at a Future Meeting to Discuss the use of Written Petition (Policy 030) by Members of the Public 10 D. Request to Place an Agenda Item at a Future Meeting to Consider a Quarterly Report to Council of Legal Expenses to Outside Law Firms and any Settleme
nt Costs (that can be disclosed) Once Cases are Settled Ethics Committee
Workplan

10. 9/28/21 Council Meeting Continue Item 7. Direction to Staff on Alternatives for Revisions to the El Camino Real Specific Plan; Possible Action on the Consultant Contract with Rami & Associates and budget amendment for Revisions to the El Camino Real Specific Plan to the next Council meeting (October 19) to be heard first under public hearing.

Community
Development
October 19 10/19/21 Heard at 10/19/21
Council meetin
g

11. 9/28/21 Council Meeting Continue Item 8. Action on the Introduction of an All‐Electric Reach Code Ordinance, including Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging, that Amends Chapter

15.36 (Energy Code) and Chapter 15.38 (Green Building Code) of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Santa Clara Municipal Code, to the Council meeting on October 19.

SVP/Public
Works/
Community
Development
Octob
er 19 10/19/21 Heard at 10/19/21
Council meeting

12. 7/13/21 Council Meeting Establish a publicly noticed meeting of an ad hoc committee comprised of Councilmembers Becker and Park to draft an apology for having consumed the City's treasury fighting a CVRA lawsuit and return to Council for ratification later. Memo on Expanded Scope to be Reported on December 7th
Mayor and
Council
TBD 10/13/21 Ad Hoc Committee
Meeting Held on
10/13/21

13. 10/13/20 Stadium Authority Stadium Bills and Claims – Return on a future agenda with an informational report on the on the Stadium Authority’s responsibility of unfunded liability Finance September 2021 9/28/21 Reported at Council
Meeting

14. 8/24/21 Council Meeting Continue item 4K. (Action on Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement with Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) for preparation of the Freedom Circle Focus Area Plan, Amendment No. 2 to Reimbursement Agreement with Freedom Circle Venture, LLC, and Related Budget Amendment) for staff to return with additional information on the process to widen the San Tomas Aquino creek trail, an explanation
of the scope of the EIR in relation to the
Greystar application and the City initiated Focus Area and to address whether the project will be subject to the pending Climate Action Plan and Reach Codes and include a robust TDM plan.

CDD 9/7/21 9/7/21 Added to 9/7/21
Council meetin
g for
discussion
Cityof
Santa Clara
SCSA

15. 8/17/21 Council Meeting
(Priority Setting
Check‐in)
Provide to Councilmember Hardy any agreements or franchise agreements between the City and AT&T that may regulate internet availability in the City IT/ City Attorney 8/18/21 Emailed to Council
from City Manager
on 8/18/21

16. 6/8/21 Council Meeting Have the City Attorney provide an updated report on the CVRA litigation and return to a future meeting.

City Attorney 8/18/21 Memo to Council
emailed to Council
from City Attorney
on 8/18/21

17. 7/6/21 Council Meeting Add to August 17, 2021 agenda for discussion the following Written Petitions (Council Policy 030): Written Petition (Council Policy 030) submitted by Gabriela Landaveri Requesting the City of Santa Clara Adopt a “Vision Zero” Policy, and Written Petition Submitted by Councilmember Jain Requesting to Place an Agenda Item at a Future Meeting to have a Policy Discussion on Data Centers
City Clerk 8/17/21 8/17/21 Added to 8/17/21
Council meeting for

discussion

18. 7/13/21 Council Meeting Add to August 17, 2021 agenda for discussion the following Written Petitions (Council Policy 030) submitted by Councilmember Jain: Written Petition Requesting to Place an Agenda Item at a Future Meeting to Discuss Creating a Special Ad Hoc Committee Consisting of Residents and Representatives of Housing Advocacy Groups to Discuss only the issues Concerning the Unhoused Population, and Written Petition Requesting to Place an Agenda Item at the A
ugust 17, 2021 Goal Setting Meeting to Consider Topics Such as Staffing and Resources, Consultants, Budget, Council Direction on Densities, Car Parking Strategy, Coordination with VTA and San Jose, and Timeline for Implementin
g a Station Area Plan
City Clerk 8/17/21 8/17/21 Added to 8/17/21
Council meeting for
discussion

19. 6/10/21 Council Meeting Agendize Written Petition (Council Policy 030) submitted by Councilmember Becker requesting a Public Apology to the Residents of Santa Clara for the CVRA Lawsuit at a future date for discussion
City Clerk 7/13/21 7/13/21 At the 7/13/21
Council meeting,
Council directed Ad
Hoc Committee

20. 3/9/21 Council Meeting Action on Tasman East Specific Plan – continue item and return with a full presentation on Tasman East Specific Plan
Community
Development
7/6/21 7/6/21 Reported at
Council Meeting

21. 5/24/21 Council Meeting Regarding a community member’s concern about trees being cut down and not replaced, Council requested that staff return with a report about the timelines of trees being cut down and if/when they will be replaced Public Works TBD 6/7/21 Reported in City
Hall News
Cityof
Santa Clara
SCSA

22. 3/10/21 Council Meeting Council to submit work schedules to Assistant City Manager Nader; staff to prepare a report regarding options for Council meeting start time City Manager 6/7/21 6/7/21 Reported at
Governance and
Ethics Committee
Meeting

23. 10/29/19 Council Meeting Provide options for the $750,000 commitment from Levy for community enrichment
City Manager 5/19/21 5/19/21 Reported at
Economic
Development,
Communications
and Marketing
Committee Meeting

24. 4/6/21 Council Meeting Regarding the 2021 Annual Street Maintenance and Rehabilitation Project – return with a communication plan on the pavement timelines and status Public Works TBD 5/7/21 Email sent to
Council from City
Manager on 5/7/21

25. 4/20/21 Council Meeting Parking Maintenance District No. 122 – Franklin Square – return with information regarding the Maintenance District and possibly absolving it Public Works/
City Attorney
5/4/21 5/4/21 Reported at
Council Meeting

26. 3/10/21 Council Meeting Referred to Governance Committee – return to Council with a Council Policy regarding eligibility list for Boards and Commissions
City Manager 5/4/21 5/4/21 Reported at
Council Meeting

27. 1/26/21 Council Meeting Regarding a written petition on Franklin mall Maintenance District Number 22 – staff to agendize this item for a future Council meeting after receiving a response back from the FPPC
Public Works/
City Attorney
TBD 4/20/21 Reported at
Council Meeting

28. 1/26/21 Council Meeting Annual Investment Policy Statement – continue this item and return to Council with an analysis on investments, including sustainability investments Finance 3/23/21 3/23/21 Reported at
Council Meeting

29. 1/12/21 Council Meeting Provide quarterly information reports on progress of Task Force on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
City Manager 3/23/21 3/23/21 Reported at
Council Meeting

30. 1/26/21 Council Meeting Regarding a written petition on Loyalton Ranch Property – staff to agendize this item for a Council meeting in March
SVP 3/23/21 3/16/21 Reported at
Council Meeting

31. 1/28/20 Council Meeting VTA Transit Oriented Communities referred to Council Priority Setting Session on 1/30 and 1/31 to provide information on staff impact. (At the Priority Setting Session, Council requested that staff schedule a study session.)
City Manager/
Public Works
TBD 3/10/21 VTA staff may
request to present
this at a future
Council meeting bu
t
that time frame is
unknown, therefore
Cityof
Santa Clara
SCSA

32. 7/9/19 Council Meeting Update on age‐friendly activities per commission annual Work Plan Parks & Rec TBD 3/10/21 Staff communicates regarding age‐
friendly activities on
an ongoing basis;
therefore, this item
has been removed
from the open
referral list

33. 7/9/19 Council Meeting Add Lawn Bowl Clubhouse Project to a future agenda and return with information on costs of installation of module. Staff to notify Lawn Bowl Club of Council meeting date so they may update Council on their fundraising efforts.

Parks & Rec TBD 3/10/21 Lawn Bowl
Clubhouse is in the
Central Park Master
Plan; project
prioritization will
depend
on funding
and completion of
other higher‐priority
projects; therefore
this item has been
removed from the
open referral list

34. 7/14/20 Council Meeting Garbage Rates – explore long‐term rate assistance programs for solid waste Public Works 3/9/21 3/9/21 Reported at Council Meeting

35. 1/26/21 Council Meeting Council Committee Assignments – Council established an ad hoc committee comprised of Mayor Gillmor, Councilmember Park and Councilmember Jain to review committee assignments and return to Council with a revised plan (current committee assignments will remain in place until a new appointment list is approved by Council
Council Ad Hoc
Committee
TBD 2/23/21 Reported at

Council Meeting

36. 10/13/20 Council Meeting Noise Monitoring at Levi’s Stadium – Return to Council with a revised scope of work that includes a monthly consultant report with data related to all Community
Development
2/23/21 2/23/21 Reported at
Council Meeting
Cityof
Santa Clara
SCSA

SANTA CLARA STADIUM AUTHORITY
COMPLETED 2021‐2022
CITY COUNCIL AND STADIUM AUTHORITY STAFF REFERRALS
Updated 1/20/22
Date
Assigned
Source Referral Description Assigned
Department
Projected
Completion
Completed Resolution
noise, including airplane noise by Levi’s Stadium. Report should include data on peak noise, how many days we exceed the noise ordinance, etc. and notify Council regarding excessive noise complaints.

37. 1/12/21 Council Meeting Staff to provide opinions from Chamber, DMO, TID and others on the need for of the services provided in the agreement and having the infrastructure in place. What would it cost to do it themselves and how would they envision this moving forward if City did not approve the agreement? City Manager 2/9/21 2/9/21 Reported at

Council Meeting

38. 1/12/21 Council Meeting Provide Incremental Milestone Completion Reports from JLL regarding project milestones from previous agreements
City Manager 2/9/21 2/9/21 Reported at
Council Meeting

39. 1/12/21 Council Meeting Provide Council with previously completed TAP audit of Convention Center Visitors Bureau
City Manager 2/9/21 2/9/21 Reported at
Council Meeting

40. 1/26/21 Council Meeting Conflict of Interest Code – continue this item to 2/9/21 to provide Stadium Management Company attorney the opportunity to provide the City/Stadium Authority information on why the Stadium Management Company individuals listed in the staff report should not be included in the Conflict of Interest Code
City Manager/
City Attorney
2/9/21 2/9/21 Reported at
Council Meeting

41. 1/12/21 Council Meeting Staff to return with an Information Memo regarding the legal process of increasing utility rates
SVP TBD 2/4/21 Memo to Council
emailed to Council
from City Manager
on 2/4/21

42. 12/16/20 Council Meeting Regarding a written petition from Sam Liu concerning a 10’ CMU wall with project at 3200 Scott Blvd., staff to return on 1/26/21 with possible options for Council consideration
Community
Development
1/26/21 1/26/21 Reported at
Council Meeting

43. 1/12/21 Council Meeting Communicate to the State Historic Preservation Office the City Council’s conditional support for the nomination of the Pomeroy Green Townhouses contingent upon completion of the following conditions: signed petition from a majority of Pomeroy Green Co‐op members; provision of resolution of support from the Co‐op board; completion of an anal ysis by a qualified historian, preferably local; City Attorney review and comments on the application; notification of all shareholders and owners of neighboring homes within a 200 foot radius including information on the process to object to the nomination
Community
Development
TBD 1/22/21 Staff sent letter to
SHPO on 1/22/21;
on 3/29/21 received
confirmation the
property is now
listed on National
and CA His
toric
Registers
Cityof
Santa Clara
SCSA

44. 8/25/20 Council Meeting Staff to return on 12/15/20 regarding a written petition from Joseph Ducato requesting changes to the sewer ordinance whereby the City reassumes responsibility for maintenance and or/replacement of the sewer laterals located in the public right‐of‐way. (The Report to Council for this item was scheduled to be presented to Council on 12/15/20, however, due to a very heavy agenda it was moved to 1/12/21.)
Water & Sewer 1/12/21 1/12/21 Reported at
Council Meeting

45. 5/4/21 Council Meeting Return to City Council for a discussion of potential actions to achieve more efficient administration of the City’s HUD PSA grants
Community
Development
9/28/21 9/28/21 Presented at Council
Meeting
Cityof
Santa Clara
SCSA

SANTA CLARA STADIUM AUTHORITY

City Council and Authorities ConcurrentJanuary 25, 2022

City Council and Authorities Concurrent
January 25, 2022