RESOLUTION NO. 22-9052
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE AB1600 REPORT ON
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 2021 AND MAKING FINDINGS REGARDING THE
CONTINUING NEED FOR UNEXPENDED BALANCES OF
IMPACT FEES AS OF JUNE 30,2021
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:
W HEREAS, Government Code Sections 66000 and following (commonly known as, and referenced herein as, "AB1600") regulate the imposition, collection, maintenance, expenditure and reporting of impact fees imposed on developers for the purpose of defraying costs of public facilities;
W HEREAS, the City of Santa Clara ("City") has identified six (6) impact fees collected from developers that are subject to AB1600's requirements. Those funds are the Traffic MitigationFee (Funds 123/533), the Sanitary Sewer Outlet Fee (Fund 594), the Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee (Fund 594), the Storm Drain Fee (Fund 535), the Parks Mitigation Fee (Fund532) and the Affordable Housing Fee (Fund 565); W HEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of AB1600, the City has set up separate special revenue funds for each type of fee, crediting earned interest to those funds, and spending the accumulated fees and related interest on appropriate expenditures; W HEREAS, the City has prepared an annual report for fiscal year 2020-21 in accordance with AB1600, "AB1600 Report on Development Impact Fees for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2021," reflecting the beginning and ending balances of each separate fund containing impact fees; theamount of fees collected and the interest earned for the year; the amount of expenditures and refunds made in the year; the percentage of expenditures paid for by fees; and a description ofthe type of fees. The amount of each of these development impact fees for FY 2020-21 is reflected in the City's Municipal Fee Schedule, previously adopted by this Council;
Resolution/AB1600 Report on Development Impact Fees FYE June 30, 2021 Page 1 of 5 Rev: 11 /22/17
WHEREAS, a copy of the annual report has been on file and available for review in the City Clerk's Office and the Finance Department at Santa Clara City Hall, and online at Santaclaraca.gov/Finance since January 14, 2022;
W HEREAS, AB1600 requires the City to make specific findings every five (5) years with respect to any portion of the fees remaining unexpended or uncommitted after a period of five (5) years to 1) identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put, 2) demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it was charged, 3) identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of the improvement, and 4) designate the approximate date on which such funding will be available; W HEREAS, the Traffic Mitigation Impact Fee, which was established for the purpose of providing a source of funding for traffic improvements, contains some fee revenues which were received more than five (5) years ago. The sum of $3,371,224 representing fees and accrued interest collected for traffic mitigation remains unexpended five (5) or more years after deposit of the fees;
W HEREAS, the Storm Drain Fee, which was established for the purpose of mitigating storm drainage that results directly or indirectly from development projects, contains some fee revenues which were received more than five (5) years ago. The sum of $240,903 representing fees and accrued interest collected for storm drainage mitigation remains unexpended five (5) or more years after deposit of the fees; and,
W HEREAS, the City desires to make the findings required by law with respect to these unexpended fees.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the City Council hereby accepts the attached AB1600 Report on Development Impact Fees for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2021 ("Report"), and makes the following findings:
//
Resolution/AB1600 Report on Development Impact Fees FYE June 30, 2021 Page 2 of 5 Rev: 11 /22/17
A. The Traffic Mitigation Impact Fee revenues are to be used to construct traffic improvements needed by new development. The amount of the fee for different land use types is proportionate to the need for traffic improvements generated by such land use types. This fee is still necessary as several projects are tied to larger development projects that have yet to occur. These development projects are still anticipated to take place based on the City's General Plan. The traffic mitigation fee is set at a lower rate than justified, and as a result projects are underfunded. This has also slowed down progress on projects resulting in some project costs increasing. Periodically, as the City updates the General Plan and as new development occurs, additional improvement projects are identified and added to the Traffic Mitigation Fee Project List.
B. The portion of the $10,505,590 fund balance in the Traffic Mitigation Fund that was at least five (5) years old as of June 30, 2021, totals $3,371,224. The City will use the entire fund balance for the projects identified in Exhibit A of the Report which are programmed in the Capital Improvement Plan. The Traffic Mitigation Fund has projects scheduled in the current Capital Improvement Plan for the next five (5) years, and depends upon additional fees and interest each year. Projects identified in Exhibit A which are funded at less than 100% with Traffic Mitigation Impact fees are funded by other sources totaling $11,786,101. Remaining appropriations totaling $8,316,545 from the other sources are as follows: Reimbursable Grants $440,232; Bonds Proceeds $1,484,476; Curb Sidewalk Fee $376,003, Measure B $271,626, Electric Utility Contribution $430,553; Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee $707,720, General Fund $1,400,000, and Developer Contributions $3,205,935. All payments have been received and are available except the Reimbursable Grants. The City expects to receive Grant repayments in fiscal year 2020-21.
//
//
//
Resolution/AB1600 Report on Development Impact Fees FYE June 30, 2021 Page 3 of 5 Rev: 11 /22/17
C. The Storm Drain Impact Fee revenues are to be used to mitigate City storm drainage that results either directly or indirectly from development projects. The amount of the fee is proportionate to the need for storm drainage improvements generated by development projects. This fee is still necessary as several storm drain projects are tied to larger development projects that have yet to occur. These development projects are still anticipated to take place based on the City's General Plan. As new development occurs, additional improvement projects are identified and added to the Storm Drain Impact Fee Project List.
D. The portion of the $650,435 fund balance in the Storm Drain Impact Fee Fund that was at least five (5) years old as of June 30, 2021, totals $240,903. The City will use the entire fund balance for the projects identified in Exhibit A of the Report which are programmed in the Capital Improvement Plan. The Storm Drain Impact Fee Fund has projects scheduled in the current Capital Improvement Plan for the next five (5) years, and depends upon additional fees and interest each year. The project identified in Exhibit A which is funded at less than 100% with Storm Drain Impact Fees is funded by the General Fund Capital Project Reserve (CPR) totaling $1,239,577. The remaining appropriation from the CPR is $564,519. //
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
Resolution/AB1600 Report on Development Impact Fees FYE June 30, 2021 Page 4 of 5 Rev: 11 /22/17
2. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.
HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED
AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: COUNCILORS: Becker, Chahal, Watanabe, Park, and Watanabe, and Mayor Gillmor
NOES: COUNCILORS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILORS: Hardy and Jain
ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS: None
ATTEST:
Attachments incorporated by reference:
1. AB1600 Report on Development Impact Fees FYE June 30, 2021 Resolution/AB1600 Report on Development Impact Fees FYE June 30, 2021 Page 5 of 5 Rev: 11 /22/17
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
CITY OF SANTA CLARA
AB1600 REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
For Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2021
BACKGROUND
Cities and counties often charge fees on new development to fund public improvements, public amenities and public services. For example, Traffic Mitigation Fees are used to fund transit facilities, streets, bike lanes and sidewalks. These fees are commonly known as development impact fees (Developer Fees). In 1989, the State Legislature passed Assembly Bill 1600 (AB1600) which added Section 66000, et seq., to the California Government Code. The chapter sets forth a number of requirements that local agencies must follow if they are to collect fees from developers to defray the cost of the construction of public facilities related to development projects. Government Code Sections 66000-66025 apply to developer fees established, increased or imposed on or after January 1, 1989, and generally sets forth four broad requirements:
1. A local jurisdiction must follow the process set forth in the bill and make certain determinations regarding the purpose and use of the fees and to establish a "nexus" or connection between a development project or class of project and the public improvement being financed with the fee.
2. The fee revenue must be segregated from the General Fund in order to avoid commingling of public improvement fees and the General Fund.
3. If a local jurisdiction has had possession of a developer fee for five years or more and has not committed that money to a project or actually spent that money, then it must make findings describing the continuing need for that money each fiscal year after the five years have expired.
4. If a local jurisdiction cannot make the findings required under paragraph 3, then the city or county must go through a refund procedure.
The Traffic Mitigation Fee, Sanitary Sewer Outlet Fee, Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee, Storm Drain Fee, Parks Mitigation Fee, and Affordable Housing Fees that the City of Santa Clara (City) collects qualify as Development Impact Fees and therefore must comply with the above referenced Government Code Sections. The amount of each of these development impact fees for fiscal year 2020-21 is reflected in the City's Municipal Fee Schedule, previously adopted by the City Council. The schedule is available at:
htt~s://www.santaclaraca.~ov/home/showpublisheddocument/67706/637257428199370000. As required by law, these fees are segregated and accounted for as Special Revenue Funds. Government Code Section 66001 requires the City to make available to the public certain information regarding these fees for each fund within 180 days after the end of each fiscal year. Accordingly, the following report is presented to the City Council for review.
ANALYSIS
Using the accounting method known as first in, first out (FIFO), which means the first revenue received is assumed to be the first spent, staff analyzed the annual balances at the end of fiscal year 2020-21 to determine what portion, if any, of the balance was five or more years old. If a balance is more than five years old, a review of previously identified projects is undertaken to determine if any developer fees collected need to be refunded.
M any of the identified projects are already underway, and the City has appropriated funds for these projects as noted in the City's FY2020-21and 2021-22 Biennial CIP Budget Book. The book is available at https://www.santaclaraca.~ov/home/showpublisheddocument/70351/637443319258630000. The identification of each Capital Project on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each Capital Project including the total percentage of the cost of the Capital Project that was funded with fees are detailed in Exhibit A.
Traffic Mitigation Fee
The Traffic Mitigation Fee is levied to fund improvements or programs to mitigate City traffic problems that result either directly or indirectly from development projects. To determine the traffic mitigation fees the City conducts a Traffic Impact Fee Nexus study. The most recent report was approved by Council August 21, 2018. The basis of Santa Clara's traffic impact fee is the number of net new PM peak hour vehicle trips generated by new development. Those additional trips result in the traffic impacts the fee is intended to mitigate. The fee is calculated by dividing the total cost of the projects in the Traffic M itigation Program by the number of additional PM peak hour trips generated by new development, which results in a "per PM peak hour trip" fee amount. For simplicity of application, this fee is then converted to a fee per square foot, per hotel room, or per dwelling unit, based on the trip generation rates in the latest ITE Trip Generation Manual. The fee shall automatically adjust for inflation annually at the start of each fiscal year, based on the latest Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index.
The following table summarizes the activity for the Traffic Mitigation Fund from 2016-17 through 2020-
21. Fund 123 & 533 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Beginning Balance $ 7,852,470 $ 8,711,428 $ 8,448,382 $ 10,353,046$ 10,448,972 Developer Fees 1,370,084 855,324 1,958,563 182,518 728,208 Interest Income 81,481 115,449 196,524 200,204 152,901
Expenditures (592,607) (1,233,819) (250,423) (286,796) (824,491) Ending Balance $ 8,711,428 $ 8,448,382 $ 10,353,046$ 10,448,972$ 10,505,590 During 2020-21, the City collected $728,208 of traffic mitigation fees, earned $152,901 from interest and incurred $824,491 of project expenditures. The grand total of the Traffic Impact Fee fund balance that is available at the end of 2020-21 is $10,505,590 of which $3,371,224 has been held for over five years.
Exhibit A identifies the projects that will make use of all unspent fees held over five years.
There is no impact on City resources since all qualified impact fees held by the City for over five years are either spent or committed, thus eliminating the need to refund any fees to developers according to Government Code Sections 66000, et seq.
2 Sanitary Sewer Outlet Fee
The Sanitary Sewer Outlet Fee is collected from developers to construct public sanitary sewer facilities.
City Council passed Ordinance 1778 on December 3, 2002 which created the sanitary sewer outlet charge which is used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of off-site sewerage facilities, and to repay principal and interest on bonds issued for the construction and reconstruction of such sewerage facilities. The fee shall automatically adjust for inflation annually at the start of each fiscal year, based on the latest Engineering News Record Consh•uction Cost Index.
The following table smnmarizes the activity for the Sanitary Sewer Outlet Fees from 2016-17 through 2020-21.
Fund 594
Beginning Balance
Developer Fees
Expenditures
Ending Balance
2016-17
$ (2,547,612)
471,667
$ (2,075,945) $ (1,831,352) $ (1,588,864) $ (1,288,884) $ (1,089,598) 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
$ (2,075,945) $ (1,831,352) $ (1,588,864)
244,593 242,488 299,980
2020-21
(1,288,884)
199,286
The amount of developer fees collected in 2020-21 was $199,286. The outstanding balance in the Sanitary Sewer• Outlet Fee Fund at the end of 2020-21 is ($1,089,598). Amounts have been transferred within the Sewer• Enterprise Fund to make up the negative balance for Capital Projects financed with AB 1600 development fees.
There is no impact on City resources since all qualified impact fees collected by the City have been spent, thus eliminating the need to refund any fees to developers according to Government Code Sections 66000-66003.
Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee
The Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee was adopted to improve and expand the sewer collection system.
City Council passed Ordinance 1428 on August 25, 1981 which created the sanitary sewer connection charge which is charged whenever a property is initially connected or• requires an addition of a new connection to the sanitary sewer system. The fee is charged based on type of dwelling unit for residential (single family, duplex, condominium, etc.) and non-residential which charges based on connection size.
The fee shall automatically adjust for inflation annually at the start of each fiscal year, based on the latest Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index.
The following table summarizes activity for the Sanitary Sewer• Connection Fee from 2016-17 through 2020-21.
Fund 594 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Beginning Balance $ (38,526,561)$ (50,329,856)$ (74,240,874)$ (87,737,999) $ (116,641,597) Developei•Fees 2,350,574 1,625,820 2,303,752 1,124,123 1,007,031 Expenditures (14,153,869)(25,536,838)(15,800,877)(30,027,721) (5,488,096) Refunded Expenditures - - - - 6,825,720
Ending Balance $ (50,329,856)$ (74,240,874)$ (87,737,999)$ (116,641,597) $ (114,296,942) During 2020-21, the City collected $1,007,031 from developer fees and spent $5,488,096 in construction project. The City received a cumulative $6,825,720 in construction refunds from the City of San Jose for the Joint Venture project, and the City reported this under a separate Refunded Expenditures line. The current year deficit along with prior cumulative deficits brought the impact fee balance to ($114,296,942)
as of 2020-21. Amounts have been h~ansferred within the Sewer Enterprise Fund to make up the negative balance for Capital Projects financed with AB 1600 development fees.
There is no impact on City resources since all qualified impact fees held by the City have been spent, thus eliminating the need to refund any fees to developers according to Government Code Sections 66000- 66003.
Storm Drain Fee
The Storm Drain Fee is levied to mitigate City storm drainage that results either directly or indirectly from development projects. The Storm Dt~ain Outlet Fee is codified in the Santa Clara City Code Section
17.15.220 Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drains and was created for the purpose of defraying the estimated costs of constructing planned drainage facilities for• removal of surface and storm waters from local drainage areas. The fee is charged based on the amount of acreage being developed with a project. The fee shall automatically adjust for• inflation annually at the start of each fiscal year, based on the latest Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index.
The following table summarizes the activity for the Storm Drain Fees from 2016-17 through 2020-21.
Fund 535 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Begirming Balance $ 552,889 $ 555,070 $ 626,783 $ 586,578 $ 613,299 Developer• Fees 10,375 67,194 5,749 15,409 27,903
Interest Income 5,213 4,760 8,845 11,312 9,233
Expenditures (13,407) (241)._....._..(54,799) - -
Ending Balance $ 555,070 $ 626,783 $ 586,578 $ 613,299 $ 650,435 During 2020-21, the City collected $27,903 from developer fees and earned $9,233 from interest. The grand total of the Storm Drain Fees that is available at the end of 2020-21 is $650,435 of which $240,903 has been held for over five years. E~ibit A identifies the projects that will make use of all unspent fees held over five years.
There is no impact on City resources since all qualified impact fees held by the City for over five years are either spent or committed, thus eliminating the need to refilnd any fees to developers according to Government Code Sections 66000-66003.
Parks Mitigation Fee
The Parks Mitigation Fee was adopted in fiscal year 2014-15 and went into effect for the 2016-17 fiscal year. Fees received can be used to provide (acquire) public pat•kland and/or make necessary park improvements according to the restrictions of the Mitigation Fee Act and help the City to address its park, recreation and open space needs The City of Santa Clara completed a Parks & Rect•eation Facilities Development Impact Fee Study in 2014 and in 2019 that were reviewed and approved by the City Council after community and stakeholder• public comment hearings. These reports provide the necessary findings required by the Mitigation Fee Act and Quimby Act for the adoption of the fees by Council resolution contained in the Municipal Fee Schedule. These reports provide the facility cost and land acquisition cost data and analysis and describe the methodology for calculation of the fees.
The parks and recreation facilities fees use an existing inventory demand standard translated into facility costs per capita to determine new development's fair share of planned facility costs. A cost standard provides a reasonable method for converting disparate types of facilities, in this case parkland and special use recreational facilities, into a single measure of demand (capital cost per capita). The cost standard is 4 based on the existing inventory of parks and recreation facilities. New residential development would fund the expansion of facilities at the same rate that existing residential development has provided facilities to date. The City uses the existing ratio of developed parkland per• 1,000 residents. In 2010 the standard was 2.45. The current standard is 2.60. (Quimby Act allows 3.0 acres/1,000 resident Standard).
The fot•mula to calculate the cost per capita of providing new park facilities involves the following variables: (A) the value per act•e of parkland by Zip Code Area of the City (95050, 90551, and 95054) as established by annual appraisal; (B) the Level of Service standard (parkland acres per 1,0000 residents); (C) Cost per 1,000 Capita; (D) cost per capita; (F) Development land use type density per household (Single Family = 2.98, Multifamily = 2.40); (G) the per• capita value of parkland improvements, and (H) a 2% in lieu fee program administrative charge. The formula used is C = A x B, D = C/1,000. This cost per capita for parkland (D), and the cost per capita for improvements (G), are each multiplied by the density of development type (F): D x F + G x F =Base Fee (E). The administrative fee (H) is then added to the Base Fee (E) foi• the "Total Fee" (I) for• each Zip Code Area: H + E = I.
The calculation tables are provided in the in-Lieu Fee Resolution adopted by Council and posted on the City website and incorporated into the Municipal Fee Schedule. Based on the date the resident developer's Project application is deemed complete, the total parkland due can be calculated, the developed parkland dedicated, and credits deducted for eligible on-site recreational amenities.
The following table summarizes the activity for the Parks Mitigation Fee from 2016-17 through 2020-21.
Fund 532 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Beginning Balance $ - $13,505,806 $10,545,074 $ 5,261,415 $10,771,523 Developer Fees 14,780,447 - 268,091 7,159,545 1,522,149 Interest Income 90,301 147,253 111,431 176,942 110,320
Expenditures (1,364,942) (3,.1.07,985) (5,663,181) (1,826,379) (3,466,274) Ending Balance $13,505,806 $10,545,074 $ 5,261,415 $10,771,523 $ 8,937,718 During 2020-21, the City collected $1,533,149 for Park Mitigation fees, earned $110,320 from interest, and incurred $3,466,274 of project expenditures. The grand total of the Parks Mitigation Fee that is available at the end of 2020-21 is $8,937,718. There are no fees that have been held over five years.
There is no impact on City resources since all qualified impact fees held by the City for over five years are either spent or committed, thus eliminating the need to refund any fees to developers according to Government Code Sections 66000-66003.
Affordable Housing Fee
The Affordable Housing Fee was adopted to mitigate the impacts of new market-rate housing development and non-residential development on the need for affordable housing, in addition to assisting in meeting the City's share of the region's housing need and implementing the goals, policies and actions specified in the Housing Element of the general plan. City Council passed Ordinance 1974 on December 5, 2017 which established the affordable housing fee applicable to residential and nonresidential projects and to encourage the development of t•ental housing and as well as smaller units that may be more affordable by design. The fee established are significantly lower than the amount needed to fully mitigate the impacts of the new for-sale and rental resident projects and non-residential project on the need for affordable housing. The fees shall automatically adjust for inflation annually using the Engineering News Record McGraw-Hill Construction Weekly Building Index for San Francisco.
The following table summarizes the activity for the Affordable Housing Fee from 2016-17 through 2020-
21. Fund 565 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Beginning Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Developer Fees - - - - 130,201
Interest Income - - - - 1,083
Expenditures - - - -
Ending Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 131,284
During 2020-21, the City collected $130,201 from developer fees and earned $1,083 from interest. The grand total of the Affordable Housing Fees that is available at the end of 2020-21 is $131,284. There are no fees that have been held over five years.
There is no impact on City resources since all qualified impact fees collected by the City have been spent, thus eliminating the need to refund any fees to developers according to Government Code Sections 66000-66003.
PUBLIC NOTICE: Public notification was achieved by posting the availability of the t•eport 15 days prior• to the meeting, as required by Government Code Section 66006(b)(2).
Attachments:
E~ibit A: Summary of Development Impact Fees
D
Exhibit A
City of Santa Clara
Summary of Local Agency Improvement Fees
(AB 1600 Development Impact Fees)
Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021
Streets and Highways (Fund 123 & 533)
Traffic Mitigation Fee (Fund 123 and 533)
FY 2019-20 Ending Fund Balance $ 10,448,972
Fees Collected 728,28
Interest Earned 152,901
Expenditures (324,491)
FY 2020-21 Ending Fund Balance S 10,505,590
Funds Accumulated in Current and Last 5 Years $ 7,134,366 Funds Held Longer than 5 Years $ 3,371,224
Yro~ects Programmed for hnpact tees 5 6,939,452
Traffic Mitigation Fee
Since Inception Date Through June 30, 2021
J
Project
# Description
Project Status/
Estimated
Completion Year
Total Project
Appropriafion All
Funding Sources
Funding
Status
%Impact
Fee Funded
Total Impact
Fee
Appropriafion
Total Impact
Fee
Expenditures
Impact Fee
Appropriation
Remaining
FY 2020-21
Impact Fee
Expenditure
1206 Ptuneridge Ave-Lawrence Espv✓y Bicycle LanesUnprovement 2021 $ 575,000 100% 20% $ 115,000$ 15,411$ 99,589$ 15,411 1214 Coleman Avenue Widening 2021 115,74"1 100% 0% 79 79 1215 Sidewalk Installation Program 2021 143,955 100% 21% 30,208 30,208 - - 7216 Traffic Studies and Signal Needs Assessment/CTpgrade Ongoing 500,000 100°/ 64% 320,000 222,280 97,720 67,930 1217 Central Control Traffic Signal Upgrade 2022 3,0]9,800 100% S8% 2,647,871 1,572,357 1,075,514 39,616 1213 Traffic Pre-Emptors 2022 1,29 ,259 100% 93 % 1,208,104 508,601 699,503 2,999 1219 Traffic Signal Enhancements Ongoing 734,141 100% 100% 734,141 572,051 162,090 42,047 1220 Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancement Faciliries Ongoing 2,759,954 100% 36% 2,359,954 1,378,452 931,50? - 1227 Traffic Monitoring at Various Locations-Phase "C" 2021 123,783 100% 100% 123,783 123,783 - - 1222 Citywide AccessiUle Pedestrian Signal Installation Ongoing 200,000 100% ] 00% 200,000 11,623 138,377 391 1224 Traffic Signal Replacement - ECR-Lafayette, Homestead, Scott Area 2029 860,510 100% 0% ?,510 ?,510 - 1232 Traffic Signal Interconnect Upgade 2025 244,560 100% 41% 100,000 14,491 85,509 14,491 1233 Pedestrian Master Plan 2021 307,135 100% 9% 27,921 - 27,921 1234 Travel Demand Model Update Ongoing 216,700 100% 92°/ 200,000 16,700 133,300 16,700 1256 Traffic Signal Modification 2021 8,160 100% 87% 7,100 7,100 1237 MCB/GAP Intersection Improvement 2021 8,368,124 100°/ 40% 3,330,400 1,623,243 1,'707,157 383,175 1238 Pedestrian Crosswalk Sensors 2021 300,000 100% 100% 300,000 - 300,000 - 1242 ntersection Unprovement- ECR at San Thomas Phase B 2021 2,843,588 100 % 66% 1,386,041 1,683,590 202,451 - 1245 Benton Bike Lane 2021 1,726,000 100% 10% 172,000 129,810 42,190 129,810 1243 Pruneridge Ave-Complete Street Plan ?021 416,347 100% 22% 90,270 - 90,270 - ]249 MultimodalImprovementPlan 2021 740,000 100% 32% 238,280 - 238,280 1251 HAWK Beacon Scott and Harrison 2021 750,000 100% 73% 544,000 12,340 531,660 12,340 1253 Saratoga Bike Lane 2021 71,000 100% 46 % 32,500 32,500 - 32,500 1261 Santa Clara School Access Improvements ?022 200,000 100% 100% 200,000 67,081 132,919 67,081 1262 Scott-Benton Traffic Si~~alTimivg 2022 165,000 100% 17% 28,500 - 28,500 - 1376 Vehicle Emission Reduction Ongoing 65,000 100% 100 % 65,000 - 65,000 - ota s $ 14,963,662$ 8,024,210
Exhibit A
City of Santa Clara
Summary of Local Agency Improvement Fees
(AB 1600 Development Impact Fees)
Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021
Sanitary Sewer Outlet Fee (Fund 594)
Sanitary Sewer Outlet Fee (Fund 594)
$ (1,288,884)
199,286
FY 2019-20 Ending Fund IIalance
Fees Collected
Interest Earned
Expenditures
FY 2020-21 Ending Fund Balance $ (1,089,598)
Funds Accumulated in Current and Last 5 Years
Funds Held Longer than 5 Years
Projects Programmed for Impact Fees
$ 1,478,409
$ -
$ -
Sanitary Sewer Outlet Fee
Since Inception Date Through June 30, 2021
Total Project
Appropriation %Impact Total Impact Total Impact Impact Fee FY ?020-21 Project Project All Funding Funding Fee Fee Fee AppropriationImpact Fee # Description Status Sources Status Funded Appropriation Expenditures Remaining ~~~ Expenditure 1907 Development Extensions Ongoing 220,445 100% 100% 220,445 1,310,043 (1,U 9,5)) - Note (1) Amounts have been transferred within the Sewer Enterprise Fund to make up the negative balance for Capital Projects financed with AB1600 Development Fees
Exhibit A
City of Santa Clara
Summary of Local Agency Improvement Fees
(AB 1600 Development Impact Fees)
Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021
Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee (Fund 594)
Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee (Fund 594)
FY 2019-20 Ending Fund Balance
Fees Collected
Prior Yeazs Construction Adjustments
$ (116,641,597)
1,007,031
6,825,720
Expenditures (5,488,096)
FY 2020-21 Ending Fund Balance $ (114,296,942)
Funds Accumulated in Current and Last 5 Years 9,749,718 Funds Held Longer than 5 Years
Projects Programmed for Impact Fees
Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee
Since Inception Date Through June 30, 2021
Total Project
Appropriation Total Impact Total Impact Impact Fee FY 2020-21 Project Project All Funding Funding %Impact Fee Fee AppropriationImpact Fee # Description Status Sources Status Fee Funded Appropriation Expenditures Remaining ~I~ Expenditure 1903 S.J.- S.C. Regional Wastewater Facility Ongoing ,55 , 77 100% 7% .. , ) , Note (I) Amounts have been transferred within the Sewer Enterprise Operating Fund and Debt Service Fund to make up the negative balance for Capital Projects financed with AB1600 Development Fees There were no interfund loans.
(2) The constrcution refunds from City of San Jose were not reported as reduction of the expenditures from FY2017-18 through FY2019-20. The refund in amount of $6,825,720 was adjusted in FY2020-21.
Exhibit A
City of Santa Clara
Summary of Local Agency Improvement Fees
(AB 1600 Development Impact Fees)
Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021
Storm Drain Fee (Fund 535)
Storm Drain Fee (Fund 535)
FY 2019-20 Ending Fund Balance $ 613,299
Fees Collected 27,903
Interest Earned 9,233
Expenditures -
FY 2020-21 Ending Fund Balance $ 650,435
Funds Accumulated in Current and Last 5 Years
~ Funds Held Longer than 5 Years
Projects Programmed for Impact Fees
409,532
240,903
273,469
Storm Drain Fee
Since Inception Date Through June 30, 2021
Total Project
Appropriation Impact Total Impact Total Impact Impact Fee FY 2020-21 Project Project All Funding Funding Fee Fee Fee AppropriationImpact Fee # Description Status Sources Status Funded Appropriation Expenditures Remaining Expenditure 1831 Miscellaneous Storm Drain Improvements Ongoing$ 316,577 100% 32% 100,000 - 100,000 $ - 1834* Storm Drain System Improvement Ongoing 425,374 100% 100% 425,374 392,106 33,268 - 1835 Storm Drain Outfall Reconstruction Program Ongoing 1,673,000 100% 39% 650,000 504,799 145,201 - Totals $ 2,414,951 $ 1,175,374 $ 896,905 278,469 -
E~ibit A
City of Santa Clara
Summary of Local Agency Improvement Fees
(AB 1600 Development Impact Fees)
Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021
Parks Mitigation Fee (Fund 532)
Parks Mitigation Fee (Fund 532)
FY 2019-20 Ending Fund Balance
Fees Collected
Interest Earned
$ 10,771,523
1,522,149
110,320
Expenditures (3,466,274)
FY 2020-21 Ending Fund Balance $ 8,937,718
Funds Accumulated in Current and Last 5 Years
Funds Held Longer than 5 Years
Projects Programmed for Impact Fees
$ 24,366,479
$ 5,576,448
Parks Mitigation Fee
Since Inception Date Through June 30, 2021
Project
Status/
Estimated Tota► Project Total Impact Total Impact Impact Fee FY 2020-21 Project Completion Appropriation All Funding %Impact Fee Fee Appropriation Impact Fee # Description Year Funding Sources Status Fee Funded Appropriation Expenditures Remaining Expenditure 3001 Misc. Pazk Improvements Ongoing $ 2,265,374 100% 26% $ 591,400 591,400 $ - $ 391,400 3136 Westwood Oaks Park Playground Rehabilitatiion 2023 1,149,800 100% 100% 1,149,800 - 1,149,800 - 3177 Youth Soccer Fields &Athletic Facilities 2021 45,251,768 100% 22% 10,032,925 9,989,384 43,041 2,569,886 3173 Playground Construction 2022 4,335,275 100% 21% 920,121 920,121 - 339,886 3181 Park Impact Fees Monitoring Project Ongoing 1,148,791 100% 73% 834,019 343,35? 490,667 49,471 3184 Montague Pazk Enhancement 2022 4,290,000 100% 100% 4,290,000 397,060 3,892,940 115,631 Totals $ 58,441,008 $ 17,818,265 $ 12,241,817 $ 5,576,448 $ 3,466,274
Exhibit A
City of Santa Clara
Summary of Local Agency Improvement Fees
(AB 1600 Development Impact Fees)
Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021
Affordable Housing Fee (Fund 565)
Affordable Housing Fee (Fund 565)
FY 2019-20 Ending Fund Balance $ -
Fees Collected 130,201
Interest Earned 1,083
Expenditures -
FY 2020-21 Ending Fund Balance $ 131,284
Funds Accumulated in Current and Last 5 Years $ 131,284 N Funds Held Longer than 5 Years $ -
Projects Programmed for Impact Fees $ -
Affordable Housing Fee
Since Inception Date Through June 30, 2021
Total Project
Appropriation Impact Total Impact Total Impact Impact Fee FY 2020-21 Project ProjectAll FundingFunding Fee Fee Fee AppropriationImpact Fee # Description Status Sources StatusFunded Appropriation Expenditures Remaining «~ Expenditure