Cities Index.
POST MEETING MATERIAL

City Council and Authorities Concurrent
April 19, 2022

Document
POST MEETING MATERIAL
Meeting
April 19, 2022
Body
City Council and Authorities Concurrent
Original file
635 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santaclara.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

4/19/2022
~~ ~. - - -.~.y c•' yQ, T ,9 ''•.o ~~~•.
~ ~iiii~ ~
v ~.... ~~ ~ ,. a
City Council
Item 6. 22-302 Action on a
Resolution Establishing the Average
Per-Acre Land Values in order to set
the Parkland In-Lieu Fees for
FY2022/23 for New Residential
Development
Council Pillar: Enhance Community
Sports, Recreational &Arts Assets
April 19, 2022
• Background City Code i~.g5 "Park &Recreational Land"
• Overview of Quimby Act and Mitigation Fee Act (MFA)
• Fee Components
• Land Valuation —Appraisal i2-3i-2o2i
• Annual Land Valuation Comparisons
• Fee amounts based on 100 % Cost Recovery
• Public Input &Response
• Policy Direction Impacts
• Summary/Recommendation z
22-302
Item 6
COST MEETINGi MATERI~►~
Presentation Overview

• Established by Council Ordinance No. 1928 (July 2014) — Requires new residential development to dedicate public parkland at current City standards 2.6 to 3 acres per i,000 residents • Amended by Council Ordinance No. 1937 (February 2015) — Removed pre-requisite for dedication of one acre of public parkland prior to eligibility for financial credit at 50% of Fees due in Lieu for private open space devoted to "Active Recreational Uses" • Addresses statutory provisions in accordance with California's — Quimby Act (Quimby) and Mitigation Fee Act (MFA)
• Quimby —Cities may require Land Dedication and/or payment of Proportional Fees "in lieu" of land dedication, and "fee only" for 5o units or less • MFA—Cities may require Dedication of parks and recreation facilities and/or Fees "in lieu" of dedication (66002(c)(~))
• Fee Components:
— Land Value (established by appraisal process for areas of City) — Improvement Value (cost of parks' amenities at existing level of service) — Administration (2 % )
• Municipal Fee Schedule contains the Fees due "In Lieu" of parl~land dedication adopted on an annual basis
— See Council Agenda Report 22-99 for Apri119, 2022
City Code 17.35 Park &Recreational Land
Background -continued

• Completed by Franlc Schmidt &Associates
• Follows City Code Section 17.35.040 &Supplemental Instructions • Valuation date of December 3i, 2021 ~01-01-2021 t0 12-31-2021 • Public comment period from April 4, 2022 t0 APT'll 14, 2022 • Parkland average per acre values for residential ZIP Code areas — 95050 $5.15 million
95051 $6.00o million
95054 $5.495 million
$5,715,000 $4,720,000 21.0% $4,385,000 $3,738,000 $3,315,000 $6,000,000 $5,120,000 17.2% $4,630,000 $3,993,000 $3,583,000 $5,495,000 $4,830,000 13.8% $4,495,000 $4,035,000 $3,669,000 5 Land Valuation—Appraisal
Land Valuation Comparisons 2016 to 2021
..- .- - -_
12-31-2021 12-31-2020 % Diff 12-31-2019 12-31-2017 12-31-2016

Quimby MFA
Current Proposed % Diff. Current Proposed % Diff.
$51,567 $62,664 021.5 /o $45,828 $55,716 021.6 /o
$41,530 $50,468 36,908 $44,872
$55,214 $65,263 0
~ 8'2 ~0
$48,989 $57,968 018.3 /o
$44,468 $52,561 $39,454 $46,686
$52,570 $60,658 015.4 /o $46,697 $53,977 015.6 /o
$42,338 $48,852 $37,609 $43,472
See Municipal Fee Schedule, RTC 22-99. Current calculation uses 2020 land values & 75% of 2oi~ park improvement value. Proposed calculation uses 2o2i land value & i00% of 2oi~ park improvement value. ~ ■ v~■vim ■■■~~r~v~.~
• Cost recovery set at 100%
— Maintains parkland standard of 2.6 to 3.o acres per i000 residents — Provides funds for acquisition and development of new parks — May provide for rehabilitation/expansion of existing parks • Cost recovery set at less than i00%
— Prior policy of using 2oi~ land valuation and a 4-year phase in of improvement value resulted in $4~583,00o uncollected value, based on actual development projects — Erosion of parkland standards and program service capacity • Construction cost escalation impacts both Developers and City — 2oi8-2o2i saw price escalation of 2i.i% (22.3% compounded) — City is equally affected by labor, supplies and construction cost increases for parks 8 1 n Lieu Fees set at 100% Cost Recovery

Public Input
• Comment:
— Developers in Patrick Henry Drive Specific Plan Area (95054) • Concerned about the impact of a Park In Lieu Fee increase on PHD • Delays in the PHD Specific Plan adoption, extra-ordinary parl~land, infrastructure fees, and long-term maintenance costs impact development • Request to keep PHD In Lieu Fee same as 2021/22 for one year or longer • Response:
— The Patrick Henry Drive Specific Plan has clearly defined "area" boundaries. — Council may set land values for other "areas" of the City in addition to 95050, 95051, 95054 see City Code 17.35.040)
Public Input
• Response (continued):
— Past City Councils have provided In Lieu Fee Policy exceptions:
• delayed implementation of a fee increase;
• maintained land valuation at less than i00% cost recovery; • kept park improvement costs artificially low; and/or, • provided a "phased in" timeline for percentage of increases. — Council could set a specific land value for PHD SP, such as • "For new residential development projects in the PHD SP Area, use the average land valuation for 95054 as of i2-3i-2o2o ($4,830,00 per acre) in MFA fee calculations from July i, 2022 to June 30, 2023."
— Alternatively, developers could request an appraisal of their specific development property, but it maybe higher than the average appraisal value for the area. (see City Code 1~.35.04o b) ,o

Public Input
• Response (continued):
— In PHD SP, Council had identified more parkland as a need that significantly adds to the quality of life in ahigh-density neighborhood. — If an in-lieu Fee policy exception is made to set at less than l00% cost recovery, then
- less fee revenue is collected to allocate toward acquisition and development of new parkland to serve the new residents;
• less funding is available for development of needed park facilities and amenities, including the proposed multi-use facility serving the community including seniors, youth, indoor recreation (community center/gym/library/parking). • Hypothetically, 4,00o units x $~,~ii/unit (difference of 2o2i land value increase on in lieu fee) _ $28M
v N~~~~~~v~■ ,
• The 2021 annual land valuation study is complete following the established Council approved processes.
• Values are used in Fee Calculations proposed in Municipal Fee Schedule (22-99) Land values in the areas are:
— 95050 $5,715,000
9505 $6,000,000
95054 $5,495,000
• Patrick Henry Drive Specific Plan Area developers requested an exception • Council may set a land value for specific areas in addition to the 3 Zip Code areas • Use of older/lower land values results in City cost recovery of less than l00% and creates a significant challenge for the acquisition and development of new public parkland and recreational amenities. 1z

■~~iVV~~~~~~~i~~MW~~V~■
• Adopt a Resolution to establish the Average Per-Acre Land Values in order to set the Parkland In -Lieu Fees for FY2o22/23 for New Residential Development in accordance with Title 1~
("Development") Chapter 35 ("Park and Recreational Land") of the City Code using the December 3i, 2o2i land valuation report. • Or, other Council direction incorporated into the above resolution. 13

← All documents from this meeting