Agenda packet — City Council and Authorities Concurrent, July 12, 2022 (part 5 of 6)

289392.1
this Agreement, and upon review and approval of Firm's bills by the Chief Assistant City Attorney, Firm shall be compensated at the preapproved hourly rates and for authorized expenses only as specifically set forth in Exhibit B (Fee Schedule) attached and incorporated by this reference. Fees for services performed by retained consultants, subcontractors, expe1is or other personnel may be billed to City only if approved in writing by the City Council or the Chief Assistant City Attorney.

7. BILLING INVOICES
Firm shall, within fifteen (15) days after the end of each calendar month in which services are performed under this Agreement, submit to the City an itemized invoice, describing the specific services performed as set fotih in this Agreement. Firm shall adhere to the billing standards set fo1ih in Exhibit B entitled "Billing Standards" attached and incorporated by this reference. The invoice shall be submitted to:

Santa Clara City Attorney's Office
c/o Chief Assistant City Attorney
1500 Warbmion Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050

8. BILLING STANDARDS
Firm shall not bill for hours other than those hours expressly devoted to the tasks approved in advance by a majority of the City Council, and/or required under the terms of this Agreement.

Firm agrees it will not bill for time which is not specifically devoted to said task(s). The Firm will not charge billable time for travel to and from the City for in-person work, although may utilize the car allowance as specified in Exhibit B. Firm may bill for lodging for Senior Counsel Jim Sanchez up to four nights per month. Firm shall not bill for secretarial or clerical tasks. The billing format utilized to provide bills shall be set forth in detailed format which readily permits review by City retained auditors.

9. TERMINATION
City may terminate this Agreement without cause or penalty at any time by providing written notice to Firm. Said termination shall be effective on the date set forth on the termination notice.

Firm may terminate this Agreement only to the extent and under terms and conditions consistent with the obligations of Firm under the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California. Notice of termination by Firm shall provide a minimum of 30 days unless such notice period is precluded by law.

In the event of termination, the amount due Firm for services rendered and costs and expenses incurred prior to termination shall remain due and payable.

City shall also have the right to temporarily suspend Firm's performance in whole or in pati, by giving a written notice of suspension to Firm. If Firm gives such notice of suspension, Firm shall immediately suspend its activities under this Agreement, as specified in such notice.

The City Council may exercise the power of City to terminate or suspend this Agreement. In

Page 3 of 8 ends

289392.1
accordance with Charter Section 908(g), immediately upon termination Firm shall surrender to City all books, papers, files and documents pertaining to the City and/or the Services, including materials that are solely attorney work product.

10. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Periodically during the term of the Agreement, Firm shall make a good faith effort to identify and shall apprise City of those possible conflicts of interest which could affect Firm's duties to City under the California Rules of Professional Responsibility, or Firm's performance of the responsibilities reposed in Firm under this Agreement, or which Firm reasonably believes are likely to affect future transactions by and between City and third parties. City retains those rights with respect to future conflicts as are vested in a client under the California Rules of Professional Responsibility, and may terminate Firm's services and withhold consent to such conflicts of interest under the California Rules of Professional Responsibility which City deems in good faith not to be in the City's best interest.

11. ASSIGNMENTS AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST
City and Firm bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns, executors and administrators to the terms of this Agreement. Except as otherwise set forth in this Agreement, no interest in this Agreement or any of the work provided for in this Agreement shall be assigned or transferred, either voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of the City Council.

Firm shall be as fully responsible to City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as Firm is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by it.

12. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
In performing work required under this Agreement, Firm is not an agent nor employee of City but an independent contractor. Firm shall at all time act as an independent contractor with respect to the performance of this Agreement, with full rights to manage its employees subject to the requirements of the law. Neither Firm nor any employees or agents of Firm shall be considered an employee of City for any purpose.

13. RECORDS AND DOCUMENTATION
Firm shall maintain complete and accurate records of the services provided to City and expenses incurred on behalf of City. Firm agrees to assist City in meeting City's reporting requirements to other agencies with respect to Firm's work under this Agreement. All records, rep01ts and documentation relating to the work performed under this Agreement shall be made available to City during the term of this Agreement, and for a period of six ( 6) years after termination of the Agreement.

14. FAIR EMPLOYMENT
Firm shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, sex, color, religion, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, age, gender, marital status, physical

Page 4 of 8 ends

289392.1
disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, sexual orientation, gender expression, gender identity, military and veteran status, or ethnic background, in violation of federal, state or local law.

15. HOLD HARMLESS/INDEMNIFICATION
A. To the extent permitted by law, Firm agrees to protect, defend, hold harmless and indemnify City, its City Council, commissions, officers, employees, volunteers and agents from and against any claim, injury, liability, loss, cost, and/or expense or damage, including all costs and attorney's fees in providing a defense to any such claim or other action, and whether sounding in law, contract, tort, or equity, arising from Firm's negligent, reckless or otherwise wrongful acts, errors, or omissions with respect to or in any way connected with the pe1formance of the work by Firm, its agents, subcontractors and/or assigns under this Agreement.

B. To the extent Firm is obligated to provide health insurance coverage to its employees pursuant to the Affordable Care Act ("Act") and/or any other similar federal or state law, Firm warrants that it is meeting its obligations under the Act and will fully indemnify and hold harmless City for any penalties, fines, adverse rulings, or tax payments associated with Firm's responsibilities under the Act.

16. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Firm shall maintain in full force and effect the following insurance policies:

A. Commercial general liability policy (bodily injury and property damage); B. Worker's compensation/employer's liability policy;
C. Business automobile liability insurance policy; and, D. Professional liability policy.

Said policies shall be maintained with respect to employees and vehicles assigned to the performance of work under this Agreement with coverage amounts, endorsements, certificates of insurance and coverage verifications as set forth in Exhibit C entitled "Insurance Requirements" attached and incorporated by this reference.

17. CONFIDENTIALITY AND DISCLOSURE
The data, information and repmis acquired or prepared by Firm in connection with matters upon which the City has retained Firm shall not be shown or distributed to any other public or private person or entity except as authorized by the City Council and in no event prior to having been first disclosed to the City Council , in accordance with applicable state law. All information, documents, records, reports, data or other materials furnished by City to Firm or other such information, documents, records, data or other materials to which the Firm has access during its performance pursuant to this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall remain the property of City. Firm shall not make oral or written disclosure of such documents or materials, other than as necessary for its performance under this Agreement, without the prior written approval of the City Attorney.

Page 5 of 8 ends

289392. l
City is subject to the requirements of the California Public Records Act (PRA). In accordance with case law interpreting the PRA (including but not limited to Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors v. Superfor Court (2016) 2 Cal.5th 282 and Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 1264) billing statements for closed files may be disclosable to the public. In the event a request is made for Firm's billing records, City shall give Firm reasonable notice to allow Firm to seek protection from disclosure by a court of competent jurisdiction, at Firm's sole expense. Firm agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless City against any and all claims or losses including reasonable attorney's fees and costs arising from Firm's request to withhold production of any documentation in response to a PRA request. In no event shall City be liable to Firm for disclosure of any documentation made in response to a PRA request.

18. AMENDMENTS
This Agreement, including any Exhibits attached to it, represents the entire understanding of the Parties as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may be modified only by a written amendment duly executed by the Pa1iies to this Agreement.

19. NO THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY
This Agreement shall not be construed or deemed to be an agreement for the benefit of any third paiiy or parties. No third party or pa1iies shall have any claim or right of action under this Agreement for any cause whatsoever.

20. NOTICES
All notices, invoices, repmis or other communication to the Paiiies shall be properly given if delivered in person or sent by First Class mail, email or overnight delivery and addressed as follows:

Santa Clara City Attorney's Office
c/o Chief Assistant Attorney
1500 Warbmion Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Email: [email protected]
And to Firm addressed as follows:

Lozano Smith
7404 N. Spalding Avenue
Fresno, CA 93 720
Email: [email protected]
Either Paiiy may change its address for receipt of notices under this Agreement by notice given in the manner provided herein.

Page 6 of 8 ends

289392.1

21. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE
This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the statutes and laws of the State of California. The venue of any suit filed by either Party shall be vested in the state courts of the County of Santa Clara, or if appropriate, in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Jose, California.

22. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE
In case any one or more of the provisions in this Agreement shall, for any reason, be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, it shall not affect the validity of the other provisions, which shall remain in full force and effect.

23. LICENSE REQUIREMENTS
Film shall demonstrate that the attorneys who provide legal services to City under this Agreement are licensed to practice law in the State of California and, if not, indicate to the satisfaction of the Chief Assistant City Attorney why such license is not required to perform the services required.

24. COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but both of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

The Parties aclmowledge and accept the terms and conditions of this Agreement as evidenced by the following signatures of their duly authorized representatives. The Effective Date is the date that the final signatory executes the Agreement. It is the intent of the Parties that this Agreement shall become operative on the Effective Date.

SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW

Page 7 of 8 ends

289392.1

CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA
A Chartered California Municipal Corporation
Dated: 4/5/2022
Lisa M. Gillmor
Dated:

MAYOR LISA GILLMOR
"City"

LOZANO SMITH LLP
___:;~~==----,.L..---+-------------
B y: ~ Lµ~~J.....:__.L_~':::'."g~~~.,,;::__ ______ _
Name, Title: Ka n M. Rezendes, Managing Partner
Principal Place of
Business: Lozano Smith, LLP
Telephone/Fax: -'(,,__9_25_,_)_9_5_3-_1_6_20 _____________ _ Email: [email protected]
"Firm"
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
289392 .1
Dated: April 5, 2022
By: Jenica Maldonado
Name, Title: Jenica Maldonado, Of Counsel
Principal Place
of Business: Renne Public Law Group
Telephone/Fax: (415) 848-7200
Email: [email protected]
"Outside Counsel"

Page 8 of 8 ends

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. Scope of Services. The scope of services for this Agreement shall include performance of the following duties and responsibilities by the Firm:
289392.1

1. Act as the City of Santa Clara's (City) Interim City Attorney.

2. Perform, or supervise the performance of, all duties as prescribed under the City Charter § 908.

3. Represent and advise the City Council and all City officers in all matters of law pertaining to their offices.

4. Represent and appear on behalf of the City and any City officer or employee in all legal actions or proceedings which the City or any such officer or employee, in or by reason of his/her official capacity is a party; provide the City Council with information and advice regarding ongoing litigation and legislation that affects the City.

5. Attend all City Council meetings and gives advice or an opinion in writing whenever requested to do so by the City Council or officers of the City.

6. Staff board and commission meetings as necessary.

7. Approve the form of all bonds and given to and all contracts made by the City, endorsing approval thereon in writing.

8. Review and approve all ordinances and resolutions and amendments thereof.

9. Prosecute cases for violation of the Charter and City ordinances; and

10. Assist and provide training on current issues in the law and City policy as needed.

11. Advise the City Council, Commissions, and City officials and staff on legal matters pertaining to municipal government, including but not limited to, the Ralph M. Brown Act, Elections Code, Public Records Act, Political Reform Act and GC 1090, Robert's Rules of Order, and MMBA.

12. Advise on procedural and substantive issues that arise during meetings.

13. Prepare or review or provide guidance to CAO staff regarding necessary legal documents such as: ordinances and resolutions; various types of agreements, real property instruments of varying nature including purchase agreements and escrows, leases, covenants, deeds, easements and licenses; bond size, amount, and offering terms and conditions; public works construction documents including bid specifications, contracts, bonds, insurance, liens and related documents; memorandums of understanding; franchise agreements; bargaining agreements A-1
289392.1
and bargaining agreement language, employment agreements, independent contract agreements, investigation reports, as required, public records act response and other legal documents as requested by the City.

14. Ensure attorney staffing at all meetings of the City Council and Stadium Authority. Meeting dates for the identified bodies are set forth on the City's website.

15. Support the following tasks on an as-needed basis:
a. Attend Council workshops or other meetings as specified by the Council, including meetings with individual Councilmembers and the City Manager, as requested.
b. Provide prompt response to inquiries by City Manager, City Clerk, or Mayor and Councilmembers, on a wide variety of topics
c. Analyze proposed and enacted legislation, publish legal opinions, and other matters that may have an impact on the operations of the city upon request.
d. Review Requests for Proposals to be published before publication upon request.
e. Upon request, provide input regarding administrative hearings. f. Review Public Records Act requests as well as documents scheduled for production prior to response/production upon request.
g. Review and provide input to CAO staff and Risk Manager on litigation management including but not limited to litigation involving in the Stadium Authority.
h. Oversee or provide input regarding court appearances handled by CAO staff (Municipal Code violation prosecutions, Pitchess motions, GVROs, WVROs, dangerous dog hearings, etc.).

1. Provide legal advice pertaining to real estate and land use issues, including, but not limited to, property acquisition (including eminent domain), property disposals (including Surplus Land Act), leases, public improvements, easements, dedications, CEQA, and public utilities as requested.

J. Provide legal advice and services on labor or personnel matters as required.
k. Be available for consultation with City staff, as needed, on legal matters which are within their area of operation and maintain office hours at City A-2
289392.1
Hall as requested by the City Council at times mutually agreeable to Council.

1. Promptly respond to calls, emails, and correspondence from City officials and staff.
m. Perform such other legal duties as may be required by the City Council that are necessary to complete the City Attorney functions. n. Provide supervisory support to the attorneys and staff of the City Attorney's Office.
o. Retain and work with existing outside legal counsel on specific litigation or transactional advice matters.

16. In addition to the more technical scope of work outlined above, the Interim City Attorney must understand their role in local government, avoiding political debates and active participation in the policy and managerial decision-making process entrusted to the City Council and the City Manager. The Interim City Attorney is expected to provide technically sound and consistent legal advice to members of the City Council and City staff while maintaining trust and unwavering ethical standards no matter the situation or the individuals involved.

17. Work collaboratively with CAO staff and the long-term City Attorney to properly transition performance of job duties to the long-term City Attorney once hired by Council.

A-3

EXHIBITB

BILLABLE RATES
Firm shall bill its time by the hour at the hourly billable rate assigned to each attorney. Firm shall bill City for its services at its current hourly rates, which are as follows:

Paiiners I Senior Counsel / Of Counsel
Associate
Paralegal/ Law Clerk
Consultant
$300/hour
$275/hour
$195/hour
$195/hour
The following attorneys and staff members are authorized to bill regarding this engagement.

Only attorneys expressly identified herein are authorized to bill regarding this engagement. Firm may seek permission from City to authorize additional billers in accordance with Section 5 of the Agreement:
• James (Jim) Sanchez, Senior Counsel
• Steve Ngo, Paitner
• Manuel Martinez, Partner
• Constantine Baranoff, Senior Counsel
• Alyse Pacheco Nichols, Senior Counsel
• Stephanie Arwick, Paralegal
• Stephanie Darand, Law Clerk
The hourly rates specified in this Exhibit B apply throughout the term of this Agreement.

Firm will be reimbursed for out-of-pocket costs and expenses actually incurred by Firm in the above-described representation of City, with the exception of fees specifically excluded herein.

Reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses shall be pre-approved by City Council and may include, but are not limited to third patty reproduction and printing costs, postage, filing fees, transcript costs, and notary fees, to the extent that any such costs are incurred on behalf of City.

With respect to reimbursement of travel-related expenses, the City shall provide monthly car allowances for Attorneys Jim Sanchez and Steve Ngo, respectively, in an amount not to exceed $500 per attorney. No other attorneys or staff of Firm are eligible to receive a car allowance or to receive reimbursement from the City for travel-related expenses. Except as noted in Section 8 of the Agreement (including lodging for Mr. Sanchez up to four times per month to facilitate working in person for the City), the City will not reimburse the cost of air travel, per diem, or any other travel-related expenses incurred by any attorney of Firm attendant to the Firm's B-1
289392.1
representation of City for this engagement. As specified in Section 8 of the Agreement, the Firm will not bill and the City will not pay attorney or staff billable rates for travel time to and from the City for in-person work.

In no event shall the maximum amount of fees plus costs exceed the maximum not to exceed contract amount listed below.

B-2
289392.1
Maximum Not to Exceed Contract Amount
In no event shall the total amount paid to the Firm for services, including all fees, costs and/or expenses, under this Agreement exceed Three Hundred Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($300,000.00) subject to budgetary appropriations. Further authorization beyond this amount must be approved by City Council and memorialized as a written amendment to this Agreement.

B-3
289392. l

EXHIBITB

BILLING STANDARDS
A. All cases shall be billed monthly pursuant to paragraph 7 of this Agreement, and shall comport with State and ABA billing standards.

B. The fee portion of each invoice shall include the attorney's name ( or initials, if full name is noted elsewhere on invoice), amount, date work was performed, the amount of time expended, rate per hour, and a brief description of the services rendered as a basis for fee calculation, or other method of determining the fees. All tasks set forth in Firm's billing documentation shall be specific and detailed. Examples of unacceptable billing entries include but are not limited to: overly generalized listings of task descriptions ( e.g., "review contract" or "prepare for negotiations"); double staff or attorney time on any task, unless expressly authorized by the City Council; block billing; time billed for additional newly assigned attorney(s) to learn case file; assigned work by law clerks; administrative costs; word processing charges; secretarial or clerical charges; time spent on researching and/or drafting work that Firm has done and billed another client for in the past.

C. Billings under this Agreement shall not be provided in more than six (6) minute increments and shall represent the devotion of a full six minutes before an increment is billed.

D. The cost and expense portion of the invoice shall clearly identify the nature and amount and any other cost(s) billed to City must be separately itemized with prior written approval of the Chief Assistant City Attorney. Any experts or contractors hired by Firm on behalf of City whose charges are billed through the Firm must also provide such billing itemization and such billing shall be attached to the billing provided to City by Firm. Professional fees and expenses invoiced to City shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after receipt of Firm's statement.

E. In support of payment for such bill, Firm shall furnish payroll records, bills, invoices, receipts or other evidence of reimbursable expenses incurred as reasonably requested by the Chief Assistant City Attorney. City reserves the right to require additional substantiation of any item of claimed expense.

F. Each month's bill should include the total billable hours and expenses to date for each matter.

G. City encourages the use of paralegals for any task that can be delegated. However, similar to attorneys, no more than two paralegals (but preferably one) should work on each case.

H. Messenger and other charges in excess of actual costs are not permitted.

I. Postage charges are billable at actual cost.

J. Expert witness fees are not automatically authorized. Firm shall obtain approval for each expert witness from the Chief Assistant City Attorney.

B-4
289392.1
K. Firm shall maintain at least the insurance coverage set forth in Exhibit C at all times.

L. Work performed on a not-to-exceed basis may not be increased without prior approval by the City Council, depending upon the amount in question.

M. If Firm is provided with a new case directly from the Chief Assistant City Attorney or City Council or if a matter arises that requires Firm to open a new file, the Chief Assistant City Attorney and City Council should be informed immediately.

N. City expects that Firm will resolve all discovery disputes without court intervention. If this is impossible due to the conduct of others, please inform the Chief Assistant City Attorney immediately.

0. City's Finance Department may send a request for an auditor response letter annually.

Firm will respond to these requests timely and will provide a copy of Firm's response letter to the Chief Assistant City Attorney.

P. Firm will provide copies of all motions or briefs which are filed related to City's litigation matters handled by Firm. Unless previously requested, Firm does not need to send drafts or miscellaneous correspondence. Copies of significant pieces of correspondence should be provided to the City Council and Chief Assistant City Attorney, unless City Council directs the Firm to omit the Assistant City Attorney from such communication, in which case the correspondence would be directed to Council alone.

Q. City expects early and frequent evaluation of its litigation cases handled by Firm. If the likelihood of success on a particular case is low, City needs to know up front in order to minimize litigation costs and make reasonable attempts to settle the case.

B-5
289392.1

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Without limiting the Contractor's indemnification of the City, and prior to commencing any of the Services required under this Agreement, the Contractor shall provide and maintain in full force and effect during the period of performance of the Agreement and for twenty-four (24) months following acceptance by the City, at its sole cost and expense, the following insurance policies from insurance companies authorized to do business in the State of California. These policies shall be primary insurance as to the City of Santa Clara so that any other coverage held by the City shall not contribute to any loss under Contractor's insurance. The minimum coverages, provisions and endorsements are as follows:

A. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE

1. Commercial General Liability Insurance policy which provides coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01. Policy limits are subject to review, but shall in no event be less than, the following:
$2,000,000 Each Occurrence
$4,000,000 General Aggregate
$2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate
$1,000,000 Personal Injury

2. Exact structure and layering of the coverage shall be left to the discretion of Contractor; however, any excess or umbrella policies used to meet the required limits shall be at least as broad as the underlying coverage and shall otherwise follow form.

3. The following provisions shall apply to the Commercial Liability policy as well as any umbrella policy maintained by the Contractor to comply with the insurance requirements of this Agreement:
a. Coverage shall be on a "pay on behalf' basis with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits;
b. There shall be no cross liability exclusion which precludes coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another; and
c. Coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of liability.

B. BUSINESS AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE
Business automobile liability insurance policy which provides coverage at least as broad as ISO form CA 00 01 with policy limits a minimum limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) each accident using, or providing coverage at least as broad as, Insurance Services C-1
289392.1
Office form CA 00 01. Liability coverage shall apply to all owned (if any), non-owned and hired autos.

C. WORKERS' COMPENSATION

1. Workers' Compensation Insurance Policy as required by statute and employer's liability with limits of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) policy limit Bodily Injury by disease, one million dollars ($1,000,000) each accident/Bodily Injmy and one million dollars ($1,000,000) each employee Bodily Injury by disease.

2. The indemnification and hold harmless obligations of Contractor included in this Agreement shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damage, compensation or benefit payable by or for Contractor or any subcontractor under any Workers' Compensation Act(s), Disability Benefits Act(s) or other employee benefits act(s).

3. This policy must include a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City of Santa Clara, its City Council, commissions, officers, employees, volunteers and agents.

D. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY
Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Contractor. Covered services as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this agreement. Coverage shall be in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($2,000,000) per claim or two million dollars ($4,000,000) aggregate. Any coverage containing a deductible or self-retention must first be approved in writing by the City Attorney's Office.

E. COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS
All of the following clauses and/or endorsements, or similar provisions, must be part of each commercial general liability policy, and each umbrella or excess policy.

1. Additional Insureds. City of Santa Clara, its City Council, commissions, officers, employees, volunteers and agents are hereby added as additional insureds in respect to liability arising out of Contractor's work for City, using Insurance Services Office (ISO) Endorsement CG 20 10 11 85, or the combination of CG 20 10 03 97 and CG 20 3 7 10 01, or its equivalent.

2. Primary and non-contributing. Each insurance policy provided by Contractor shall contain language or be endorsed to contain wording making it primary insurance as respects to, and not requiring contribution from, any other insurance which the indemnities may possess, including any self-insurance or self-insured retention they may have. Any other insurance indemnities may possess shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not be called upon to contribute with Contractor's insurance.

3. Cancellation.

C-2
289392.1
a. Each insurance policy shall contain language or be endorsed to reflect that no cancellation or modification of the coverage provided due to non-payment of premiums shall be effective until written notice has been given to City at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of such modification or cancellation. In the event of nonrenewal, written notice shall be given at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of non-renewal.
b. Each insurance policy shall contain language or be endorsed to reflect that no cancellation or modification of the coverage provided for any cause save and except non-payment of premiums shall be effective until written notice has been given to City at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such modification or cancellation. In the event of non-renewal, written notice shall be given at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of non-renewal.

4. Other Endorsements. Other endorsements may be required for policies other than the commercial general liability policy if specified in the description of required insurance set forth in Sections A through E of this Exhibit C, above.

F. ADDITIONAL INSURANCE RELATED PROVISIONS
Contractor and City agree as follows:

1. Contractor agrees to ensure that subcontractors, and any other party involved with the Services, who is brought onto or involved in the performance of the Services by Contractor, provide the same minimum insurance coverage required of Contractor, except as with respect to limits. Contractor agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this Agreement. Contractor agrees that upon request by City, all agreements with, and insurance compliance documents provided by, such subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review.

2. Contractor agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the project reserves the right to charge City or Contractor for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this Agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to City. It is not the intent of City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto.

3. The City reserves the right to withhold payments from the Contractor in the event of material noncompliance with the insurance requirements set forth in this Agreement.

G. EVIDENCE OF COVERAGE
Prior to commencement of any Services under this Agreement, Contractor, and each and every subcontractor ( of every tier) shall, at its sole cost and expense, provide and maintain not less than the minimum insurance coverage with the endorsements and deductibles indicated in this Agreement. Such insurance coverage shall be maintained with insurers, and under forms of policies, satisfactory to City and as described in this Agreement. Contractor shall file with the C-3
289392.1
City all certificates and endorsements for the required insurance policies for City's approval as to adequacy of the insurance protection.

H. EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE
Contractor or its insurance broker shall provide the required proof of insurance compliance, consisting of Insurance Services Office (ISO) endorsement forms or their equivalent and the ACORD form 25-S ce1tificate of insurance ( or its equivalent), evidencing all required coverage shall be delivered to City, or its representative as set forth below, at or prior to execution of this Agreement. Upon City's request, Contractor shall submit to City copies of the actual insurance policies or renewals or replacements. Unless otherwise required by the terms of this Agreement, all certificates, endorsements, coverage verifications and other items required to be delivered to City pursuant to this Agreement shall be mailed to:

EBIX Inc.

City of Santa Clara [*insert City depaiiment name here] P.O. Box 100085 - S2 or 1 Ebix Way
Duluth, GA 30096 John's Creek, GA 30097
Telephone number: 951-766-2280
Fax number: 770-325-0409
Email address: [email protected]
I. QUALIFYING INSURERS
All of the insurance companies providing insurance for Contractor shall have, and provide written proof of, an A. M. Best rating of at least A minus 6 (A- VI) or shall be an insurance company of equal financial stability that is approved by the City or its insurance compliance representatives.

Signature: 1 ffe/1/{a ;fja(!{of!a/0 Jenica Maldonado (Apr 5, 202216:02 PDT) Email: [email protected]
289392.1
C-4
Signature: """' L~-.,.....,- ,-s,-20-22-23-,24_ p_oT-l
Email: [email protected]
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-841 Agenda Date: 7/12/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Public Hearing: Actions on a Multi-family Residential Project at 3141 - 3155 El Camino Real

COUNCIL PILLAR
Promote and Enhance Economic, Housing and Transportation Development

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The applicant, Oak Investment Group, LLC, is proposing to construct a 60-unit residential development at 25 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) on two contiguous parcels totaling 2.41 acres. The project site is located in the El Camino Real Focus Area, a local and regional commercial and transportation corridor envisioned for high intensity commercial and residential development in the City’s 2010-2030 General Plan. The site is developed with multiple commercial buildings totaling 21,780 square feet and paved parking areas.

The proposed project includes a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); a Rezone from Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) to Planned Development (PD); and Tentative Tract Map (CEQ2020-01080, PLN2020-14674 and PLN2020- 14705). These entitlements together would allow development of 60 for-sale residential units with resident and guest parking, private street site access and circulation, landscaped open area for shared resident use, and off-site improvements, which includes removal of one-way vehicular bridge over Calabazas Creek adjacent to the project site. The residential units are comprised of 40 townhomes and 20 flats. Nine (15%) of the total number of units are to be provided as affordable housing units and secured with and Affordable Housing Agreement with the City. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions governed by a Homeowners Associated are to be established and implemented for future private maintenance of the development.

BACKGROUND
The project site is currently designated Community Mixed-Use in the General Plan and is within the El Camino Real Focus Area. This designation provides flexibility to allow development that is either entirely commercial, completely residential or a combination of commercial and residential development at a minimum commercial floor area ratio of 0.10 and residential development between 20 to 36 dwelling units per acre.

The General Plan vision for the El Camino Real is to transform this Focus Area from a series of automobile-oriented commercial uses to a tree-lined pedestrian and transit-oriented corridor with a mix of retail and residential uses at higher intensities of development. To further this vision, in 2015, the City Council authorized the El Camino Real as a Priority Development Area (PDA) for the intensification of land uses along transit corridors. PDAs are locally designated areas within communities to focus compact and efficient growth and development that: 1) increases both the City of Santa Clara Page 1 of 6 Printed on 7/8/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-841 Agenda Date: 7/12/2022
housing supply, including affordable housing for low-income residents and jobs within the planning area; 2) supports and increases transit ridership and thereby reducing vehicle miles traveled by PDA residents, employees and visitors; 3) promotes multi-modal connections for residents, employees and visitors within the PDA; and 4) locates key services and retail within the planning area.

The subject property is currently developed with a mixture of restaurant, retail and service commercial uses located within three one-story commercial pad buildings totaling 21,780 square feet in area. Adjoining uses are single family residential to the north and a lot currently under construction for a four-story residential project to the east. Commercial uses are located to the south, across El Camino Real, and to the west, across Calabazas Boulevard. A rezoning of the property is required to convert the existing use of the site from commercial to residential use. The applicant has proposed a PD zoning of the site in order to establish unique development standards for the project and Tentative Tract Map for sale of the individual units. The primary issues for the project are consistency with the City’s General Plan and conformance with the City Code for a Planned Development Zoning.

The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the General Plan for the site, including the policies of the El Camino Real Focus Area, and the sites’ land use designation of Community Mixed Use, as discussed in the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 4).

However, the three-story proposal does not follow the direction on height provided by the City Council during the consideration hearings on the El Camino Real Specific Plan in the Summer of 2021, as discussed below.

El Camino Real Specific Plan
In 2017, the City Council initiated preparation of a Specific Plan for the El Camino Real Focus Area to provide a more detailed level of policy and design guidance to support the successful transformation of the corridor. A Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) was appointed to guide the Specific Plan planning process. Preparation of a draft El Camino Real Specific Plan was completed in May 2021 and presented to the City Council for adoption at the June 15, 2021 City Council meeting. The draft Specific Plan included three proposed land use designations, as recommended by the CAC, supporting residential and mixed-use development at low (Corridor Residential), medium (Corridor Mixed-Use) and higher (Regional Mixed-Use) densities. The Corridor Residential designation was intended to support development of townhomes and stacked flat housing projects, while the Corridor Mixed-Use and Regional Mixed-Use designations were intended to support mixed-use residential apartment or condominium style development.

As recommended by the CAC, the El Camino Real Specific Plan draft land use plan identified the project site as Corridor Mixed-Use allowing four- to five-story residential development at 45 to 65 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The draft Specific Plan, including land uses, was presented for City Council adoption at the June 15, 2021 City Council meeting. The City Council directed staff to modify the proposed Specific Plan Land Use designations to establish reduced height limits and densities as follows: no more than two stories for Corridor Residential, no more than three stories for Corridor Mixed-Use, and no more than four stories for Regional Mixed-Use. As part of the Council consideration of the item, the applicant requested that the subject property be designated Corridor Residential to align with their desire to develop the site with a townhouse/stacked flat project rather than at the higher density of Corridor Mixed-Use, which would correspond to a higher density, type of development. The City Council did not take action on this request but expressed support for a townhome type development.

City of Santa Clara Page 2 of 6 Printed on 7/8/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-841 Agenda Date: 7/12/2022
On July 6, 2021, the City Council affirmed their direction to staff to prepare an alternative form of the Specific Plan that reduces densities from the prior draft; and, at their meeting on October 19, 2021, it was again reiterated to proceed with modification of the Specific Plan to include the height limits as directed at the July meeting. At the October meeting, the City Council also directed staff to continue consideration of the first draft Specific Plan and to prepare an analysis comparing the economic feasibility of the two different land use plans. As part of the recent budget process the Council allocated funding to proceed with work on the Specific Plan and staff will be returning to City Council in the next month to further define the scope of this work.

DISCUSSION
The project was presented to the Planning Commission at a public noticed meeting on June 15, 2022. At this meeting, staff provided an overview of the proposal and was followed by the developer to present background information, planning process timeline and responses to comments by the Planning Commission. A single resident participated in the meeting to convey support of for-sale housing opportunities that include affordable units and responded to neighbor concerns regarding height and residential density in the design. Following the close of public hearing, the Planning Commission questioned and discussed off-site improvements by the applicant, including removal of the one-way vehicle bridge that spans Calabazas Creek located across from the site along Calabazas Boulevard, and the project and plans under study by the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) and the City for future bike lanes along El Camino Real as a part of the draft Central Bikeway Study and its potential impact to the site if, and when, developed. The Planning Commission members also expressed concern regarding the loss of retail at this location with specific attention to the grocery market that serves the culturally diverse community. The Planning Commission concluded their deliberations with the following motions 7-0-0-0:

1. Adopt a resolution recommending that Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project.

2. Adopt a resolution recommending that Council rezone the project site from CT to PD to allow development of the project as proposed by the Developer, subject to the following conditions:
· Preserve and upgrade the bridge for safety to avoid traffic and U-turn challenges on Calabazas Boulevard.
· Evaluate the VTA bike plan in conjunction with the project proposed, including maintaining the eight-foot public right-of-way for future a bike path and planting of trees along the bikeway.
· City to evaluate impact to local retail and address in the Specific Plan other opportunities for cultural relocation of displaced businesses. · Request that Traffic Engineering provide additional information to the Council on the requirements for the bridge removal.

3. Adopt a resolution recommending that Council approve the Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the land into residential condominiums and a common interest lot to serve the development.

The existing one-way vehicular bridge that spans Calabazas Creek is located on Calabazas Boulevard directly across from the project. This bridge is owned and maintained privately by the applicant, was permitted by the Santa Clara Valley Water District in the late 1960’s and provides direct southbound left turn access to the previous development from Calabazas Boulevard. The City of Santa Clara Page 3 of 6 Printed on 7/8/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-841 Agenda Date: 7/12/2022
developer is proposing to remove this bridge so that they will not need to maintain it into the future.

Public Works staff supports this removal to eliminate unnecessary midblock street openings due to the close proximity to the intersection of El Camino Real and Calabazas Boulevard. Adequate access to the project site from southbound Calabazas Boulevard can be accommodated through a Uturn at El Camino Real. The applicant has been coordinating with the Santa Clara Valley Water District regarding removal.

Regarding future VTA plans for bicycle facilities on El Camino Real (i.e. VTA’s draft Central Bikeway Study), Public Works staff have been closely involved in this study. Although the Central Bikeway Study has not been approved by the City Council, staff did review both the development plans and the draft Central Bikeway Study plans and do not see any conflict between the plans or any need to limit sidewalks on El Camino Real to 8-feet as suggested by the VTA.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A MND was prepared for the project by the environmental consultant firm David J. Powers & Associate, Inc., in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The MND and Notice of Availability were posted on the City’s website at <https://www.santaclaraca.gov/our-city/departments-a-f/community-development/planningdivision/environmental-review-ceqa> and circulated for 30-day review on February 14, 2022, and ending on March 15, 2022, in accordance with CEQA requirements. The Planning Department received agency comments on the MND from Caltrans and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority and are provided as Attachment 2 along with responses to comments for review.

The MND examined potential environmental impacts associated with project development and identified air quality, biological, cultural resources, geology and soils, and hazards and hazardous materials impacts that with incorporation of mitigation measures into the project would reduce all potential impacts to less than significant. A detailed discussion of the potential impacts and mitigation measures to be applied to the project are specified in the MND and would be implemented through project conditions of approval and the MMRP for the proposed project.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City for processing the requested application other than administrative time and expense typically covered by processing fees paid by the applicant.

COORDINATION
This report has been coordinated with the City Attorney’s Office.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City’s official-notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting. A hard copy of any agenda report may be requested by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 615-2220, email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or at the public information desk at any City of Santa Clara public library.

Public Notices and Comments
On June 2, 2022, the notice of public hearing for this item was posted in three conspicuous places within 300 feet of the project site and was mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the project City of Santa Clara Page 4 of 6 Printed on 7/8/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-841 Agenda Date: 7/12/2022
site boundaries. Newspaper notice of this item was published in The Weekly on June 1, 2022.

Public comments have been received and are provided in Attachment 11 of this report.

Public Outreach Meeting
A virtual public outreach meeting was conducted by the applicant on December 16, 2021, at 6:00 p.m. to present the proposed project and engage the neighborhood community in the planning process. Notices of the meeting were mailed by the applicant to property owners within 500 feet of the project boundaries and interested parties and was also posted on the City’s website.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Adopt a resolution to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project.

2. Adopt a resolution to approve a rezoning from Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) to Planned Development (PD) to allow development of 60 condominium units consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, private street, landscaped open space, surface parking and site improvements. [Developer’s Proposal]

3. Adopt a resolution to approve a rezoning from Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) to Planned Development (PD) to allow a two- and three-story-story development with 60 condominium units consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, private street, landscaped open space, surface parking and site improvements, but modified to limit the height to two stories. [Reduced Height Alternative]

4. Adopt a resolution to approve the Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the land into residential condominiums and a common interest lot to serve the development.

5. Deny the rezoning from Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) to Planned Development (PD) to allow development of 60 condominium units consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, private street, landscaped open space, surface parking and site improvements.

6. Deny the City Council the Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the land into residential condominium and four common interest lots to serve the development.

RECOMMENDATION
Alternatives:1, 2 and 4

1. Adopt a resolution to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project.

4. Adopt a resolution to approve the Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the land into residential condominiums and a common interest lot to serve the development.

Reviewed by: Andrew Crabtree, Director of Community Development Approved by: Rajeev Batra, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Initial Study (Web Link)

2. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

3. Responses to Comments received on the Mitigated Negative Declaration

4. Excerpt Draft Planning Commission meeting minutes of June 15, 2022 City of Santa Clara Page 5 of 6 Printed on 7/8/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-841 Agenda Date: 7/12/2022

5. Planning Commission Staff report of June 15, 2022

6. Project Data

7. Resolution Recommending Council Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

8. Resolution Recommending Council Approve the Rezone

9. Resolution Recommending the Council Approve the Tentative Subdivision Map

10. Conditions of Rezoning Approval

11. Conditions of Tentative Subdivision Map Approval

12. Correspondence

13. Development Plans

14. Tentative Tract Map
City of Santa Clara Page 6 of 6 Printed on 7/8/2022
powered by Legistar™
3155 El Camino Real Residential Project
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration:
https://www.santaclaraca.gov/Home/Components/BusinessDirectory/BusinessDirectory/441/3649 3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 1 City of Santa Clara DRAFT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project

CITY OF SANTA CLARA
April 19, 2022
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 2 City of Santa Clara

P R E F A C E
Section 21081 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a Lead Agency to adopt a Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program whenever it approves a project for which measures have been required to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The purpose of the monitoring or reporting program is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation.

On _____, the Planning Commission approved the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded that the implementation of the project could result in significant effects on the environment and mitigation measures were incorporated into the proposed project or are required as a condition of project approval. This Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program addresses those measures in terms of how and when they will be implemented.

This document does not discuss those subjects for which the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded that mitigation measures would not be required to reduce significant impacts.
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 1 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
Air Quality
IMPACT AIR-1: The
proposed project would
generate fugitive dust
in the form of PM10
and PM2.5 which
would expose sensitive
receptors to substantial
pollutant
concentrations.

MM BIO-1: During any construction period ground
disturbance, the applicant shall ensure that the project contractor implement measures to control dust and exhaust.

Implementation of the measures recommended by BAAQMD
and listed below would reduce the air quality impacts
associated with grading and new construction to a less than significant level. Additional measures are identified to reduce construction equipment exhaust emissions. The contractor shall implement the following best management practices that are required of all projects:
• All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day.
• All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered.
• All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street
sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power
sweeping is prohibited.
• All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour (mph).
• All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved
shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads
shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless
seeding or soil binders are used.

During any
construction
period ground
disturbance.

Project applicant Director of
Community
Development
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 2 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
• Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting
equipment off when not in use or reducing the
maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the
California airborne toxics control measure Title 13,
Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations
[CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for
construction workers at all access points.
• All construction equipment shall be maintained and
properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s
specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a
certified mechanic and determined to be running in
proper condition prior to operation.
• Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number project construction superintendent regarding dust
complaints. This person shall respond and take
corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s
phone number shall also be visible to ensure
compliance with applicable regulations.

IMPACT AIR-2: The
construction of the
proposed project would
result in nearby
sensitive receptors
being exposed to TAC
emissions in excess of
BAAQMD threshold
MM AIR-2.1: Prior to the issuance of any demolition, grading, or building permits (whichever occurs earliest), the project applicant shall submit construction operations plan to the Director of Community Development or the Director’s
designee that includes specifications of the equipment to be used during construction. The plan shall be accompanied by a letter signed by an air quality specialist, verifying that the equipment included in the plan meets the standards set forth in MM AIR-2.2.

Prior to the
issuance of any
demolition,
grading, or
building permits
(whichever
occurs earliest)
Project applicant Director of
Community
Development or
the Director’s
designee
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 3 City of Santa Clara

MM AIR-2.2: Use construction equipment that has low diesel particulate matter exhaust to minimize emissions.

A feasible plan to reduce emissions such that increased cancer risk and annual PM2.5 concentrations from construction would be reduced below significance levels is as follows:
• All construction equipment larger than 50 horsepower
used at the site for more than two continuous days or 20 hours total shall meet EPA Tier 4 emission standards
for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). Alternatives
to this include the following:
o Use of construction equipment with engines that
meet EPA Tier 2 or 3 emission standards with
CARB-certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate
Filters (DPF) or equivalent, otherwise,
o Use of electrical or non-diesel fueled
equipment.

Alternatively, the applicant could develop a separate feasible plan that reduces on- and near-site construction DPM emissions by 40 percent or greater. Such a plan would have to be
reviewed and approved by the City.
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 4 City of Santa Clara

Construction activities
could disrupt nesting
raptors, or other birds,
resulting in
abandonment of nests
and loss of fertile eggs.

MM BIO-1.1: Construction shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season to the extent feasible. The nesting season for most birds, including most raptors, in the San Francisco Bay Area extends from February 1st through August 31st.

If it is not possible to schedule construction and tree removal between September 1 and January 31, then pre-construction surveys for nesting birds shall be completed by a qualified ornithologist to ensure that no nests are disturbed during project implementation. This survey shall be completed no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of grading, tree removal, or other construction activities during the early part of the breeding season (February through April) and no more than 30 days prior to the initiation of these activities during the late part of the breeding season (May through August).

During this survey, the ornithologist shall inspect trees and other possible nesting habitats within and immediately adjacent to the construction area for nests. If an active nest is found sufficiently close to work areas to be disturbed by construction, the qualified ornithologist, shall determine the extent of a construction-free buffer zone to be established around the nest to ensure that raptor or migratory bird nests would not be disturbed during project construction.

During
construction
activities.

Project applicant Director of
Community
Development
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 5 City of Santa Clara

Construction activities
would potentially
uncover and disturb
archeological resources
on-site.

MM CUL-1.1: Archaeological monitoring by a qualified
prehistoric archaeologist shall be completed during soil excavation on-site.

MM CUL-1.2: In the event that prehistoric or historic
resources are encountered during excavation and/or grading of the site, all activity within a 50-foot radius of the find shall be stopped, the Community Development Director will be
notified, and a qualified archeologist shall examine the find and provide recommendations for further treatment, if warranted.

Construction and potential impacts to the area(s) within a radius determined by the archaeologist shall not recommence until the assessment is complete.

During
excavation and
grading, at the
time a discovery
is made
Project applicant Director of
Community
Development
Impact CUL-2:

Construction activities
would potentially
uncover and disturb
human remain
resources on-site.

MM CUL-2.1: In the event that human remains are discovered during excavation, trenching and/or grading of the site, all activity within a 50-foot radius of the find shall be stopped. The Santa Clara County Coroner shall be notified and shall make a determination as to whether the remains are of Native
American origin or whether an investigation into the cause of death is required. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the Coroner shall notify the Native American
Heritage Commission (NAHC) immediately. Once NAHC
identifies the most likely descendants, the descendants will make recommendations regarding proper burial, which will be During
excavation and
grading, if
human remains
are discovered
Project
Applicant
Santa Clara
County Coroner,
Native American
Heritage
Commission
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 6 City of Santa Clara

Geology and Soils
Impact GEO-1: The
project site is located
within a mapped
liquefaction hazard
zone and has soils with
high shrink swell
potential. Buildings
constructed on-site
could experience
settlement in the event
of strong ground
shaking as a result of
an earthquake or other
geologic events
GEO-1.1: To avoid or minimize potential damage from seismic shaking and other geologic events, and consistent with General Plan Policy 5.10.5-P6, the project would be built using standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques. Building, redevelopment, design, and construction at the site shall be completed in conformance with the recommendations of a
design-level geotechnical investigation, which will be included in a geotechnical report to the City. The report shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Clara’s Building Division as part of the building permit review and issuance process. The building shall meet the requirements of applicable Building and Fire Codes, including the 2019 California
Building Code, as adopted or updated by the City. The project shall be designed to withstand potential geologic hazards identified on the site, including liquefaction and shrink swell capacity of soils, and the project shall be designed to reduce the risk to life or property to the extent feasible and in compliance with the Building Code.

Building permit
review and
issuance, and
construction.

Project applicant City of Santa
Clara’s Building
Division
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Impact HAZ-1:

Construction of the
proposed project could
expose construction
MM HAZ-1.1: The project applicant shall be required to
develop a Soil and Groundwater Management Plan and submit it to the City of Santa Clara and the Santa Clara County Department of Environment Health (SCCDEH) prior to
Prior to issuance
of any
demolition or
grading permits
Project applicant
and contractors
Director of
Community
Development
and SCCDEH
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 7 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
workers to soil
contaminants, soil
vapor, and
contaminated
groundwater on the
project site.
issuance of any demolition or grading permits (whichever occurs first) for review and approval. The project applicant must then provide the approved Soil and Groundwater
Management Plan to the General Contractor and each of its subcontractors for incorporation into their Health and Safety Plans (HSP).

MM HAZ-1.2: All contractors must prepare a site-specific Health and Safety Plans (HSP) to establish health and safety protocols for their personnel working at the project site. The HSPs will be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Clara and the SCCDEH prior to issuance of demolition or grading permits (whichever occurs first) and will be modified
accordingly if previously unknown impacted materials are encountered during construction. These modifications must meet federal and State of California (OSHA) standards for hazardous waste operations (29 CFR 1910.120 and 8 CCR
5192). Earthwork activities in contaminated materials will be performed by licensed contractors with personnel trained in hazardous waste operations (40-hour OSHA training).

All contractors will be responsible for following the protocols presented in their HSP. The contractor will also prepare an injury and illness prevention plan. The contractor’s HSP will contain provisions for limiting chemical exposure to
construction workers, chemical and on-chemical hazards, emergency procedures, and standard safety protocols.
(whichever
occurs first)
Prior to issuance
of any
demolition or
grading permits
(whichever
occurs first)
Project applicant
and contractors
Director of
Community
Development
and SCCDEH
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 8 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
• Work activities will be conducted with, at a minimum, Level D protection including:
o Rubber boots when in contact with
groundwater;
o Work boots;
o Work gloves;
o Safety glasses when risk of splashing or contact
with groundwater;
o Hard hat at all times; and
o Hearing protection (if noise levels exceed 85
dBA).

Contractors are also required to determine the requirements for worker training, based on the level of expected contact to soil and groundwater associated with their workers’ activities.

MM HAZ-1.3: The project site will be fenced and gated with a lock. Access to the project site will be limited by the General Contractor to authorized personnel. Site control procedures will be implemented by the General Contractor to control the flow of personnel, vehicles and materials in and out of the site. Signs will be posted by the General Contractor instructing visitors to sign in at the project support areas at all project site entrances.

MM HAZ-1.4: If suspect and/or confirmed impacted soil is encountered, decontamination procedures shall be established During
construction
In the event that
contaminated
Contractor
Contractor
Director of
Community
Development
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 9 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
and implemented by the Contractor to reduce the potential for construction equipment and vehicles to release contaminated soil onto public roadways or other off-site transfer. At a minimum, gravel will be placed at all project site access points by the Contractor and excess soil will be removed from
construction equipment using dry methods (e.g., brushing or scraping) prior to moving the equipment to off-site locations.

All truck tires shall be cleaned prior to leaving the project site.

Decontamination rinse will be captured and stored in
Department of Transportation (DOT) approved containers for subsequent testing and off-site disposal.

MM HAZ-1.5: Excavated soil suspected to be impacted will require additional stockpiling measures. The stockpile area will be clean and free of debris prior to the placement of the bottom liner. The liners will consist of heavy-duty plastic (minimum of 30-mil) as the bottom and top liners. All stockpiles will include berms for containment of any water that drains from the soil.

Stockpiles will be inspected at least twice daily and repaired as needed. At the end of each shift or when the stockpile is not in use for two hours or longer, the pile(s) will be securely covered with the heavy-duty plastic liner. All stockpiles will be handled as to prevent or reduce potential dust generation. Additional water spray will be utilized for dust suppression and foam or surfactant will be utilized for stabilization of stockpiles, if necessary.
soil is
encountered.

In the event that
contaminated
soil is
encountered.

Contractor
Director of
Community
Development
Director of
Community
Development
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 10 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
MM HAZ-1.6: In addition to the measures above, following demolition activities a qualified Environmental Professional will collect soil samples around former borings EB-2, EB-3, EB-4, and EB-5 to evaluate the lateral extent of soil exceeding residential screening levels. These samples will comply with the specifications identified in the Soil and Ground Water Management Plan prepared for the proposed project.

MM-HAZ-1.7: If over excavation of some or all of the former tank backfill is required for geotechnical purposes, the designated Environmental Professional shall observe
excavation activities and perform sampling of laboratory analyses.

The contractor will delineate the former tank pit boundaries and will perform the necessary excavation. The Environmental Professional will document the approximate size of the former tank pit excavation as well as visibly apparent indicators of contamination on the excavation sidewall or base.

An organic vapor meter will be used to monitor hydrocarbon vapors in the excavation. Soil observed to be potentially impacted should be placed on top of and covered by plastic sheeting and will be separately stockpiled from presumed “clean” soil. The Environmental Professional will process In the event that
contaminated
soil is
encountered.

If over
excavation of
some or all of
the former tank
backfill is
required.

Qualified
Environmental
Professional
Designated
Environmental
Professional
SCCDEH
SCCDEH
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 11 City of Santa Clara

MM-HAZ-1.8: During construction activities, if unanticipated contamination (e.g., if soil discoloration, odors, and/or elevated organic vapor meter readings are noted), buried structures (e.g., sumps or tanks), or hazardous debris are encountered that may pose a risk to human health or the environment, earthwork in the suspect area will be immediately stopped and worker access to the suspect area will be restricted. The area will be cordoned off using delineators and caution tape, or similar materials by the Contractor. Subsequently, the Environmental Professional and project applicant will be notified. The quality of soil suspected to be contaminated will be evaluated through
analytical testing by the Environmental Professional so that appropriate handling and disposal alternatives can be
determined.

MM-HAZ-1.9: During impacted soil loading activities, the contractor will place heavy plastic sheeting beneath the trucks to collect any spilled soil. To avoid spreading of the
contamination, after each truck is loaded and prior to moving off the plastic sheeting, the top rails, fences, tires, and all other surfaces with visible dust or soil spilled during loading will be removed by dry brushing methods at the point of loading. The collected soil on the plastic will be periodically removed to avoid the spreading of impacted soil on the truck tires.

During
construction
activities, if
unanticipated
contamination or
hazardous debris
are encountered
that may pose a
risk
During impacted
soil loading
activities
Contractor
Contractor
The
Environmental
Professional
The
Environmental
Professional
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 12 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
MM-HAZ-1.10: The Environmental Professional will be
present on-site during the removal of impacted soil and will be responsible for observing soil conditions and Contractor’s activities. As part of this process, daily field reports documenting Site activities will be completed and made
available for inspection by authorized oversight personnel for the duration of the project.

The Environmental Professional will complete daily field reports for each day that they are on-site. Entries will be complete and accurate enough to permit reconstruction of the Environmental Professional’s field activities. Each page will be dated, and the time of entry noted. The following information will be included for each sample:
• Sample identification number
• Sample location and description
• Site sketch showing sample location and measured
distances
• Sampler’s name(s)
• Date and time of sample collection
• Designation of sample as composite or grab
• Type of sample (i.e., matrix)
• Type of preservation
During the
removal of
impacted soil
The
Environmental
Professional SCCDEH
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 13 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
• Type of sampling equipment used
• Field observations and details important to analysis or integrity of samples (e.g., heavy rains, odors, colors, etc.)
• Instrument readings (e.g., photoionization detector
[PID], etc.)
• Chain-of-custody form numbers and chain-of-custody
seal numbers
• Transport arrangements (courier delivery, lab pickup, etc.)
MM-HAZ-1.11: The following General Procedures will be
carried out for construction on the project site:
• Trenches/excavations that extend below the concrete
section shall be screened daily with an organic vapor
meter or similar meter. Total volatile organic
compounds at a sustainable concentration of five ppmv
above background shall require personnel to stop work
and leave area. If concentrations do not recede, the
trench/excavation shall be barricaded and the
Environmental Consultant contacted.
• Open trenches/excavations shall be inspected daily for readily observable indications of possible cave-ins,
hazardous atmosphere or other hazardous conditions.
• If readily observable conditions are noted that could result in cave-in, hazardous atmosphere or other
hazardous condition, exposed workers shall be removed
During
Construction
Contractor and
applicant
Director of
Community
Development
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 14 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
from the area until the necessary precautions have been taken to address the concern.
• Trenches/excavations shall be protected with adequate barriers or physical protection.
• Stockpiles of soil shall not be stored within 2 feet of a trench/excavation.
• Where oxygen deficiency (atmospheres containing less
than 19.5 percent oxygen) or a hazardous atmosphere
exists or could reasonably be expected to exist, the
atmosphere shall be tested before workers enter the
work area.
• Adequate precautions shall be taken to prevent
exposures to atmospheres containing less than 19.5
percent oxygen and or hazardous atmospheres,
including proper respiratory protection or ventilation. • Workers shall not work in excavations/trenches in
which there is accumulated water or in
trenches/excavations in which water is accumulating,
unless adequate precautions have been taken against the hazards posed by the accumulation. These measures can
include PPE, shoring or water removal.
• Workers shall wash hands thoroughly after handling
project site soil or groundwater even if they were
wearing protective gloves.

MM-HAZ-1.12: If utility trenches extend into groundwater, measures will be implemented to reduce the potential for vapor 3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 15 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
and groundwater migration through trench backfill and utility conduits. Such measures shall include placement of lowpermeability backfill “plugs” at selected intervals on-site and at all locations where the utility trenches extend off-site. In addition, utility conduits that are placed below groundwater will be installed with water-tight fittings to reduce the potential for groundwater to migrate into the conduits. The Civil Engineer should survey and record all ‘plug’ placement
locations.

MM-HAZ-1.13: If excavation dewatering is required, pumped water will be transferred from the excavations into holding tanks and then either pumped to the sanitary sewer under a Publicly Owned Treatment Works permit, treated and
discharged to the storm drain system pursuant to a California Regional Water Quality Control Board – San Francisco Bay Region (Water Board) National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit, and/or loaded into tanker trucks for off-site disposal. If on-site reuse for dust control is desired, water samples must be collected from the holding tank and analyzed for volatile organic compounds and TPHg (EPA Test Method 8260B) and TPHd (EPA Test Method 8015M). If the detected analytes do not exceed groundwater ESLs, the water in the holding tanks can be reused on-Site for dust control.

During
excavation if
utility trenching
expands into
groundwater.

During
excavation if
dewatering is
required
Applicant and
Contractor
Applicant and
contractor
Civil Engineer
California
Regional Water
Quality Control
Board
Impact HAZ-2: The
proposed project would
MM-HAZ-2.1: Based on the detection of Perchloroethylene (PCE) and benzene exceeding residential environmental
Prior to the start
of construction
Applicant and
contractor
SCCDEH
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 16 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
expose future residents
to vapor intrusion onsite.
screening levels (ESLs), vapor intrusion mitigation (VIM) measures will be implemented for the future development. A VIM system design and construction quality assurance plan will be submitted to Santa Clara County Department of
Environmental Health (SCCDEH) for review and approval
prior to start of construction. The VIM design document will describe pre-occupancy sub-membrane sampling. Although
concentrations of PCE and benzene detected do not
significantly exceed Tier 1 ESLs, the VIM system will be designed to avoid any post-occupancy sampling or monitoring requirement. Such a system could include two membranes (one on sub-grade and one sub-slab), a minimum eight inches of gaspermeable gravel beneath the concrete slab/membrane, and passive sub-slab ventilation.
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 17 City of Santa Clara In addition to mitigation measures listed above, there are also other conditions of approval the project shall implement, including the following:

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
Long-term increased cancer risk and annual PM2.5 exposure for new project occupants: Best Management Practices • Install air filtration in residential units on the ground floor that are within 90 feet of the closest El Camino Real travel lanes (Buildings 1 and 2). Air filtration devices shall be rated MERV13 or higher. To ensure adequate health protection to sensitive receptors (i.e., residents), this ventilation system, whether mechanical or passive, shall filter all fresh air that would be circulated into the dwelling units. • The ventilation system shall be designed to keep the building at positive pressure when doors and windows are closed to reduce the intrusion of unfiltered outside air into the building.
• As part of implementing this measure, an ongoing maintenance plan for the buildings’ heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) air filtration system shall be required that includes regular filter replacement. • Ensure that the use agreement and other property documents: (1) require cleaning, maintenance, and monitoring of the affected buildings for air flow leaks, (2) include assurance that new owners or tenants are provided information on the ventilation system, and (3) include provisions that fees associated with owning or leasing a unit(s) in the building include funds for cleaning, maintenance, monitoring, and replacements of the filters, as needed.

Soil Erosion: Best Management Practices
• All excavation and grading work would be scheduled in dry weather months or construction sites would be weatherized to withstand or avoid erosion.
• Stockpiles and excavated soils would be covered during construction with secured tarps or plastic sheeting. • Vegetation in disturbed areas would be replanted as quickly as possible after construction.

Conditions for Lead and Asbestos Removal
• In conformance with state and local laws, a visual inspection/pre-demolition survey, and possible sampling, shall be conducted prior to the demolition of on-site buildings to determine the presence of asbestos-containing materials and/or lead-based paint. • Prior to demolition activities, all building materials containing lead-based paint shall be removed in accordance with Cal/OSHA Lead in Construction Standard, Title 8, California Code of Regulations 1532.1, including employee training, employee air monitoring, and dust 3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 18 City of Santa Clara

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
control. Any debris or soil containing lead-based paint or coatings would be disposed of at landfills that meet acceptance criteria for the waste being disposed.
• All potentially friable ACMs shall be removed in accordance with National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) guidelines prior to any building demolition or renovation that may disturb the materials. All demolition activities will be undertaken in accordance with Cal/OSHA standards contained in Title 8 of CCR, Section 1529, to protect workers from exposure to asbestos. • A registered asbestos abatement contractor shall be retained to remove and dispose of ACMs identified in the asbestos survey performed for the site in accordance with the standards stated above. • Materials containing more than one percent asbestos are also subject to BAAQMD regulations. Removal of materials containing more than one percent asbestos shall be completed in accordance with BAAQMD requirements.

Best Management Practices: Construction Water Quality Impacts • Burlap bags filled with drain rock shall be installed around storm drains to route sediment and other debris away from the drains; • Earthmoving or other dust-producing activities would be suspended during period of high winds; • All exposed or disturbed soil surfaces would be watered at least twice daily to control dust as necessary; • Stockpiles of soil or other materials that can be blown by the wind would be watered or covered; • All trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials shall be covered; • All paved access roads, parking areas, staging areas and residential streets adjacent to the construction sites would be swept daily (with water sweepers); and
• Vegetation in disturbed areas would be replanted as quickly as possible.

Best Management Practices: Post-Construction Water Quality • When the construction phase is complete, a Notice of Termination (NOT) for the General Permit for Construction will be filed with the RWQCB and the City of Santa Clara. The NOT shall document that all elements of the SWPPP have been executed, construction materials and waste have been properly disposed of, and a post-construction stormwater management plan is in place as described in the SWPPP for the project site.
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 19 City of Santa Clara

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
• All post-construction Treatment Control Measures (TCMs) shall be installed, operated, and maintained by qualified personnel. On-site inlets will be cleaned out at a minimum of once per year, prior to the wet season. • The property owner/site manager shall keep a maintenance and inspection schedule and record to ensure the TCMs continue to operate effectively for the life of the project. Copies of the schedule and record must be provided to the City upon request and must be made available for inspection on-site at all times.

Construction Noise Control Plan Measures
• Construction activities shall be limited to hours between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No construction is permitted on Sundays or holidays.
• Construct temporary noise barriers, where feasible, to screen stationary noise-generating equipment. Temporary noise barrier fences would provide a 5 dBA noise reduction if the noise barrier interrupts the line-of-sight between the noise source and receiver and if the barrier is constructed in a manner that eliminates any cracks or gaps. • Equip all internal combustion engine-driven equipment with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment.
• If geotechnical conditions allow, drilled piles should be used in place of impact or vibratory pile driving. Drilled piles would generate substantially less noise than impact-drive pile driving. • Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines should be strictly prohibited. • Locate stationary noise-generating equipment, such as air compressors or portable power generators, as far as possible from sensitive receptors as feasible. If they must be located near receptors, adequate muffling (with enclosures where feasible and appropriate) shall be used reduce noise levels at the adjacent sensitive receptors. Any enclosure openings or venting shall face away from sensitive receptors. • Utilize "quiet" air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists. • Construction staging areas shall be established at locations that will create the greatest distance between the construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. • Control noise from construction workers’ radios to a point where they are not audible at existing residential uses to the north of the project site.
• The contractor shall prepare a detailed construction plan identifying the schedule for major noise-generating construction activities. The construction plan shall identify a procedure for coordination with adjacent residential land uses so that construction activities can be scheduled to minimize noise disturbance.
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project 20 City of Santa Clara

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project
• Designate a "disturbance coordinator" who would be responsible for responding to any complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator will determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., bad muffler, etc.) and will require that reasonable measures be implemented to correct the problem. Conspicuously post a telephone number for the disturbance coordinator at the construction site and include in it the notice sent to neighbors regarding the construction schedule.

Interior Noise Impact Conditions
• A qualified acoustical specialist shall prepare a detailed analysis of interior residential noise levels resulting from all exterior sources during the design phase pursuant to requirements set forth in the State Building Code. The study will review the final site plan, building elevations, and floor plans prior to construction and determine building treatments to reduce residential interior noise levels to 45 dBA DNL or lower.

Treatments would include, but are not limited to, sound-rated windows and doors, sound-rated wall and window constructions, acoustical caulking, protected ventilation openings, etc. The specific determination of what noise insulation treatments are necessary shall be conducted on a unit-by-unit basis during final design of the project. Results of the analysis, including the description of the necessary noise control treatments, shall be submitted to the City, along with the building plans and approved design, prior to issuance of a building permit.

Sources: City of Santa Clara. Draft Initial Study for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Development Project. April 2022. 3155 EL CAMINO REAL RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
The 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared and evaluated in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The IS/MND was circulated for 30 days from February 14 to March 15, 2022. The City received two comment letters during the public comment period:

Comment Letters Received by the City from State, County, or Local agencies:

A. California Department of Transportation March 14, 2022 B. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority March 15, 2022 This memo responses to public comments on the IS/MND as they relate to the potential environmental impacts of the project under CEQA. Numbered responses correspond to comments in each comment letter. Copies of all comment letters are attached.

Comment Letter A: California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) – March 14, 2022 Comment A-1: The project is located directly along State Route (SR)-85 in Santa Clara. The project proposes to construct eight residential buildings containing a total of 60 residential units. The buildings would range from two to three stories with a height of approximately 34 to 40 feet. The project would also include 110 parking spaces.

Response A-1: Caltrans has correctly summarized the project as presented in the IS/MND.

Comment A-2: The project VMT analysis and significance determination are undertaken in a manner consistent with the Office of Planning and Research’s (OPR) Technical Advisory. Per the IS/MND, this project is found to have a less than significant VMT impact, therefore working towards meeting the State’s VMT reduction goals.

Response A-2: Caltrans has correctly interpreted the VMT analysis presented in the IS/MND.

Comment A-3: Potential impacts to the State Right-of-Way (ROW) from project-related temporary access points should be analyzed. Mitigation for significant impacts due to construction and noise should be identified. Project work that requires movement of oversized or excessive load vehicles on State roadways requires a transportation permit that is issued by Caltrans. To apply, visit:
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/transportation-permits. Prior to construction, coordination may be required with Caltrans to develop a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) to reduce construction traffic impacts to the State Transportation Network (STN).

Response A-3: The proposed project has analyzed the Air Quality, Noise, and Hazards impacts of the proposed project including improvements associated with the removal of the “porkchop” within the State ROW. These impacts were found to be less than significant, or were mitigated to a less than significant level with the incorporation of measures as identified in sections 4.3, 4.9, and 4.13 of the IS/MND. The proposed project would acquire all necessary permits from Caltrans to complete construction. Additionally, the proposed project would coordinate with Caltrans on the development of a TMP to reduce any impacts on the STN.

Comment A-4: As the Lead Agency, the City of Santa Clara is responsible for all project mitigation, including any needed improvements to the State Transportation Network (STN). The project’s fair share contribution, financing, scheduling, implementation responsibilities and lead agency monitoring should be fully discussed for all proposed mitigation measures.

Response A-4: The analysis did not identify any impacts to the State ROW. Therefore, there is no nexus to require transportation mitigation for the project.

Comment A-5: If any Caltrans facilities are impacted by the project, those facilities must meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards after project completion. As well, the project must maintain bicycle and pedestrian access during construction. These access considerations support Caltrans’ equity mission to provide a safe, sustainable, and equitable transportation network for all users.

Response A-5: The proposed project will comply with state and local regulations for ADA accessibility and will maintain access to pedestrian and bicycle access during construction.

Comment A-6: Please be advised that any permanent work or temporary traffic control that encroaches onto Caltrans’ ROW requires a Caltrans-issued encroachment permit. As part of the encroachment permit submittal process, you may be asked by the Office of Encroachment Permits to submit a completed encroachment permit application package, digital set of plans clearly delineating Caltrans’ ROW, digital copy of signed, dated and stamped (include stamp expiration date) traffic control plans, this comment letter, your response to the comment letter, and where applicable, the following items: new or amended Maintenance Agreement (MA), approved Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD), approved encroachment exception request, and/or airspace lease agreement. Your application package may be emailed to [email protected].

Please note that Caltrans is in the process of implementing an online, automated, and milestonebased Caltrans Encroachment Permit System (CEPS) to replace the current permit application submittal process with a fully electronic system, including online payments. The new system is expected to be available during 2022. To obtain information about the most current encroachment permit process and to download the permit application, please visit https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/ep/applications.

Response A-6: The proposed project would require encroachment into the Caltrans ROW and would therefore require a Caltrans encroachment permit. The developer would provide the required permit information prior to construction and would coordinate with Caltrans on the requirements of the permit.

Comment Letter B: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority – March 15, 2022 Comment B-1: VTA appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project. VTA has reviewed the document and has the following comments:

Central Bikeway Integration
VTA has worked closely with City of Santa Clara staff to plan for a future high quality, low stress bikeway that is complimentary of the City of Santa Clara Council Adopted Bicycle Master Plan vision for El Camino Real. Central Bikeways builds on the idea of protected bikeway and enhances it, with a sidewalk level bikeway, permanent protected barrier, enhanced landscaping, lighting upgrades, wayfinding, and improved protected intersections. While still in the conceptual planning stage, it is important to not preclude or increase costs for the future bikeway as properties redevelop along this important corridor. Please visit www.vta.org/centralbikeway for more details.

VTA commends the project for removing curb cuts along El Camino Real. Doing so reduces the amount of conflict points for pedestrians and bicycle and enhances the experience on this section of El Camino Real. VTA strongly recommends the following modifications to the site plan to better integrate with the future Central Bikeway:
x Maintain only eight-foot width maximum of sidewalk along the El Camino Real frontage.

The project states it will build a 10.5-foot sidewalk, although it unclear from the site plan how much is on private property and how much is in the public right of way. Extending the sidewalk beyond eight feet in the public right of way could conflict with the future bikeway and require additional work or cost to rebuild the sidewalk in the future (see Attachment A).

However, if the project intends to build some of the proposed 10.5-foot sidewalk on private property, VTA supports this plan.
x Potentially minimize the use of trees along the four-foot planted strip. Relocation or removal of this trees would likely occur I the future when the bikeway is constructed. x Provide a fair share contribution towards the future reconstruction of the Calabazas Boulevard protected intersection improvements identified in the Central Bikeway Basis of Design Plans (see attachment A). VTA strongly supports this project removing the free righthand turn (porkchop) from El Camino Real to Calabazas Boulevard. This goes a long way towards creating a safer city for all users.
x Require any light poles along El Camino Real to also include additional pedestrian-scale lighting to compliment the future bikeway.

We recognize some of these changes may be counterintuitive to the current design and vision of wider sidewalks and a planted buffer common along El Camino Real.

Response B-1: The VTA’s support of the project is acknowledged. VTA’s recommendations regarding sidewalk width, fair share contribution, lighting, and tree planting will be taken under consideration by the decision-making bodies. Additionally, the proposed project would expand the sidewalk into the project site and would not take up additional right of way on the street side of the sidewalk. The proposed project would comply with the policies, guidelines and regulations of the decision-making body regarding the project design features.
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” DISTRICT 4

OFFICE OF TRANSIT AND COMMUNITY PLANNING
P.O. BOX 23660, MS–10D | OAKLAND, CA 94623-0660
www.dot.ca.gov
March 14, 2022 SCH #: 2022020290
GTS #: 04-SCL-2022-01020
GTS ID: 25578
Co/Rt/Pm: SCL/82/13.65
Debby Fernandez, Associate Planner
City of Santa Clara
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Re: 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) Dear Debby Fernandez:

Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the environmental review process for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project. We are committed to ensuring that impacts to the State’s multimodal transportation system and to our natural environment are identified and mitigated to support a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system. The following comments are based on our review of the February 2022 MND.

Project Understanding
The project is located directly along State Route (SR)-85 in Santa Clara. The project proposes to construct eight residential buildings containing a total of 60 residential units. The buildings would range from two to three stories with a height of approximately 34 to 40 feet. The project would also include 110 parking spaces.

Travel Demand Analysis
The project VMT analysis and significance determination are undertaken in a manner consistent with the Office of Planning and Research’s (OPR) Technical Advisory. Per the IS/MND, this project is found to have a less than significant VMT impact, therefore working towards meeting the State’s VMT reduction goals.

Construction-Related Impacts
Potential impacts to the State Right-of-Way (ROW) from project-related temporary access points should be analyzed. Mitigation for significant impacts due to construction and noise should be identified. Project work that requires movement of oversized or excessive load vehicles on State roadways requires a transportation

CALIFO RNIA STATE TR ANS PORTATION AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM , GOVERNOR California Department of Transportation •
lb/trans·
•
Debby Fernandez, Associate Planner
March 14, 2022

Page 2 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” permit that is issued by Caltrans. To apply, visit: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/trafficoperations/transportation-permits. Prior to construction, coordination may be required with Caltrans to develop a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) to reduce construction traffic impacts to the STN.

Lead Agency
As the Lead Agency, the City of Santa Clara is responsible for all project mitigation, including any needed improvements to the State Transportation Network (STN). The project’s fair share contribution, financing, scheduling, implementation responsibilities and lead agency monitoring should be fully discussed for all proposed mitigation measures.

Equitable Access
If any Caltrans facilities are impacted by the project, those facilities must meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards after project completion. As well, the project must maintain bicycle and pedestrian access during construction. These access considerations support Caltrans’ equity mission to provide a safe, sustainable, and equitable transportation network for all users.

Encroachment Permit
Please be advised that any permanent work or temporary traffic control that encroaches onto Caltrans’ ROW requires a Caltrans-issued encroachment permit. As part of the encroachment permit submittal process, you may be asked by the Office of Encroachment Permits to submit a completed encroachment permit application package, digital set of plans clearly delineating Caltrans’ ROW, digital copy of signed, dated and stamped (include stamp expiration date) traffic control plans, this comment letter, your response to the comment letter, and where applicable, the following items: new or amended Maintenance Agreement (MA), approved Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD), approved encroachment exception request, and/or airspace lease agreement. Your application package may be emailed to [email protected].

Please note that Caltrans is in the process of implementing an online, automated, and milestone-based Caltrans Encroachment Permit System (CEPS) to replace the current permit application submittal process with a fully electronic system, including online payments. The new system is expected to be available during 2022. To obtain information about the most current encroachment permit process and to download the permit application, please visit https://dot.ca.gov/programs/trafficoperations/ep/applications.

Debby Fernandez, Associate Planner
March 14, 2022

Page 3 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” Thank you again for including Caltrans in the environmental review process. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, or for future notifications and requests for review of new projects, please email [email protected].

Sincerely,

MARK LEONG
District Branch Chief
Local Development Review
c: State Clearinghouse
x
x
x
x
~
anta Clara Valley
Transportation
Authority
March 15, 2022
City of Santa Clara
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Attn. Debby Fernandez, Assoc iate Planner
By Email [email protected]
Dear Debby,
VTA appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project VTA has reviewed the document and has the following comments:

Central Bikeway Integration
VTA has worked very closely with City of Santa Clara staff to plan for a future high quality, low-stress bikeway that is complimentary of the City of Santa Clara Counci l Adopted Bicycle Master Plan vision for El Camino Rea l. Central Bikeway builds on the idea of protected bikeway and enhances it, with a sidewalk level bikeway, permanent protected barrier, enhanced landscaping, lighting upgrades, wayfinding, and improved protected intersections. While still in the conceptual planning stage, it is important to not preclude or increase costs for the future bikeway as properties redevelop along this important corridor. Please visit www.vta.org/centralbikeway for more details.

VTA commends the project for removing curb cuts along El Camino Rea l. Doing so, reduces the amount of conflict points for pedestrians and bicyclists and enhances the experience on this section of El Camino Rea l. VTA strongly recommends the following modifications to the site plan to better integrate with the future Central Bikeway
Maintain only eight-foot width maximum of sidewalk along the El Camino Real frontage. The project states it will build a 10.5-foot sidewa lk, although it unclear from the site plan how much is on private property and how much is in the public right of way. Extending the sidewa lk beyond eight feet in the public right of way could conflict with the future bikeway and require additional work or cost to rebuild the sidewalk in the future (see Attachment A). However, if the project intends to build some of the proposed 105-foot sidewalk on private property, VT A supports this plan.

Potentially minimize the use of trees along the four-foot planted strip. Relocation or removal of this trees would likely occur in the future when the bikeway is constructed.

Provide a fair-share contribution towards the future reconstruction of the Calabazas Boulevard protected intersection improvements identified in the Central Bikeway Basis of Design Plans (see Attachment A). VTA strongly supports this project removing the free right-hand turn (porkchop) from El Camino Real to Calabazas Boulevard. This goes a long way towards creating a safer city for all users.

Require any light poles along El Camino Real to also include additional pedestrian-scale lighting to compliment the future bikeway.
3331 North First Street
San Jose, CA 95134-1927
Administration 408-321-5555
Customer Service 408-321-2300 Solutions that move you
City of Sa n Jose
3155 El Camino Real Residential Project

Page 2 of 2 ends

We recognize that some of these changes may be counterintui tive to the current design and vision of wider sidewalks and a planted buffer common along El Ca mino Real.

Thank you agai n for the opportunity to review this project If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 408-321-5830 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Lola Torney
Transportation Planner Ill
SC2203

(/&$0,125($/
&$/$%$=$6
%/9'
&$/$%$=$6
%/9'

' $
21(:$<5$,6('
6(3$5$7('%,.(:$<
*

6,'(:$/.
5('8&7,21

352326('3527(&7('
,17(56(&7,2163(&,$/,=('
75($70(170$<%(1(('('
)25%,.(:$<$/2 1*
&$/$%$=$6%/9'

$
'

)2&

52:

)2&

52:

*

72 72

6,'(:$/.
5('8&7,21

$57,&8/$7('
%86
$57,&8/$7('
%86
(/&$0,12 5($/
$/3,1( $9
(
$ '
21(:$<5$,6('
6(3$5$7(' %,.(:$<
352326('
,17(56(&7,21
02',),&$7,21

)2&

52:

)2&

52:

)520

)520

352-(&712

'(6,*1('%<
'5$:1%<
5(9,(:('%<
'$7(

6&$/(

',$/72//)5((

$7/($677:2:25.,1*'$<6
%()25(<28',*
8QGHUJURXQG6HUYLFH$OHUW
6+((7 2)
6+((77,7/( 6+((712
0$5. '(6&5,37,21
,668(
'$7( ,17,$/
WK6WUHHW6XLWH$_ 2DNODQG&$
_DOWDJRFRP
'ZJILOHQDPH
6
?3URMHFWV??3:?3/27'5$:,1*6?6,GZJ/DVWVDYHGE\ PYHUDFUX]3ORWGDWH

303ORWVW\OHWDEOH
$/7$1&66WDQGDUGVWE
0$&::09&

2DNODQG5RDG 6DQ-RVH&$

6$17$&/$5$97$&(175$/%,.(:$<
352-(&7
167675((76$1-26(&$

6&$/( 3/$16&$/( )((7

0$7&+/,1(6(($%29(
0$7&+/,1(6((%(/2:
0$7&+/,1(6((6+((76,
0$7&+/,1(6((6+((76,
6,
6DQWD&ODUD9DOOH\
&HQWUDO%LNHZD\3URMHFW

&255,'25&21&(376
(/&$0,125($/
21(:$<6,'(:$/./(9(/
6(3$5$7('%,.(:$<
127(
5,*+778516 21$5('6,*1$/3+$6(6+$//%(5(675,&7('
1VH1NJ3 AVM1Nl8
!iii-ii
0 "
•

DRAFT EXCERPT MINUTES
Planning Commission Meeting – June 15, 2022

PUBLIC HEARING

2. 22-718 Actions on a Proposed Multi-family Residential Project to Develop 60 units (40 Townhomes and 20 Flats) at 3141 - 3155 El Camino Real Recomme11dario11: Altematives:1, 2 and 4

1. Adopt a resolution to recommend the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mrtigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project.

2. Adopt a resolution to recommend the City Council approve a rezoning from Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) to Planned Development (PD) to allow a 60 condominium unit deve lopme-nt consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 Hats, private street, landscaped open space, surface parking and srte improvements, at a height of two and three stories. [Developer's Proposal]

4. Adopt a resolution to recommend the City Council approve the Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the land into residential condominiums and a common interest lot to serve the development.

Associate Planner Debby Fernandez provided the staff PowerPoint.

Edward McMahon, Bayview Building, provided the applicant PowerPoint.

Public Speaker: Brett Zipse
A motion was made by Commissioner lkezi, seconded by
Co111111issiOllt!'I Cllt!'I ukur U LU t;IOS~ µulJlit: 111:HII illy.

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 06/1512022

Aye: 7 - Chair Biagini, Vice Chair Cherukuru, Commissioner Herro, Commissioner Huang, Commissioner lkezi, Commissioner Saleme, and Commissioner Bhatnagar
A motion was made by Commissioner Cherukuru, seconded by Chair Biagini to approve staff recommendation 2 with upgrades for safety and bridge preservation, evaluations of the VTA bike plan to maintain an 8' minimum right of way, planting of trees, and having the City evaluate impact of local retai l and possible relocation.

Aye: 7 - Chair Biagini, Vice Chair Cherukuru, Commissioner Herro, Commissioner Huang, Commissioner lkezi, Commissioner Saleme, and Commissioner Bhatnagar
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-718 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION

SUBJECT
Actions on a Proposed Multi-family Residential Project to Develop 60 units (40 Townhomes and 20 Flats) at 3141 - 3155 El Camino Real

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The applicant, Oak Investment Group, LLC, is proposing to construct a 60-unit residential development at 25 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) on two contiguous parcels totaling 2.41 acres. The site is currently developed with multiple commercial buildings totaling 21,780 square feet and paved surface parking areas. The proposal includes 60 for-sale residential units, a private street, visitor parking, common landscaped open space, and future private maintenance provisions with the establishment of a Homeowners Association (HOA) and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s). The residential units are composed of 40 three-story townhomes and 20 flats. Nine units (15% of the 60 units) are to be provided as affordable housing units.

The project site is located in the El Camino Real Focus Area, a local and regional commercial and transportation corridor envisioned for high intensity commercial and residential development in the City’s 2010-2035 General Plan. The proposal is generally consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the General Plan for the site as discussed in the following report; however, the three-story proposal does not follow the direction on height provided by the City Council during the summer 2022 consideration hearings on the El Camino Real Specific Plan.

BACKGROUND
The proposed project includes a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); a Rezone from Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) to Planned Development (PD); and Tentative Tract Map (File Nos. CEQ2020-01080, PLN2020-14674 and PLN2020-14705). These entitlements together would allow development of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, private street site access and circulation, landscaped open area for shared resident use, and off -site improvements that includes removal of the pedestrian bridge over Calabazas Creek adjacent to the project site.

A rezoning of the property is required to convert the existing use of the site from commercial to residential use. The applicant has proposed a PD zoning of the site in order to establish unique development standards for the project and a Tentative Tract Map for sale of the individual units.

El Camino Real Draft Specific Plan
City of Santa Clara Page 1 of 10 Printed on 6/10/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-718 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022
In 2017, the City Council initiated preparation of a Specific Plan for the El Camino Real Focus Area to provide a more detailed level of policy and design guidance to support the successful transformation of the corridor. A Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) was appointed to guide the Specific Plan planning process. Preparation of a draft El Camino Real Specific Plan was completed in May 2021 and presented to the City Council for adoption at the June 15, 2021 City Council meeting. The draft Specific Plan included three proposed land use designations, as recommended by the CAC, supporting residential and mixed-use development at low (Corridor Residential), medium (Corridor Mixed Use) and higher (Regional Mixed Use) densities. The Corridor Residential designation was intended to support development of townhouse and stacked flat projects, while the Corridor Mixed Use and Regional Mixed-Use designations were intended to support mixed-use residential apartment or condominium style development.

As recommended by the CAC, the El Camino Real Specific Plan draft land use plan identified the project site as Corridor Mixed-Use allowing four- to five-story residential development at 45 to 65 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The draft Specific Plan, including land uses, was presented for City Council adoption at the June 15, 2021 City Council meeting. The City Council directed staff to modify the proposed Specific Plan Land Use designations to establish reduced height limits and densities as follows: no more than two-stories for Corridor Residential, no more than three stories for Corridor Mixed-Use, and no more than four stories for Regional Mixed-Use. As part of the Council consideration of the item, the applicant requested that the subject property be designated as Corridor Residential to align with their desire to develop the site with a townhouse/stacked flat project rather than at the higher density of Corridor Mixed-Use, which would correspond to a higher density, mixeduse type of development. Three community members expressed support for this lower density, while other community members advocated that it be retained as commercial use. The City Council did not take action on this request but expressed support for a townhouse type development.

On July 6, 2021, the City Council affirmed their direction to staff to prepare an alternative form of the Specific Plan that reduces densities from the prior draft, and, at their meeting on October 19, 2021, it was again reiterated to procced with modification of the Specific Plan to include the height limits as directed at the July meeting. At the October meeting, the City Council also directed staff to continue consideration of the first draft Specific Plan and to prepare an analysis comparing the economic feasibility of the two different land use plans. At the time of this staff report, the draft Specific Plan is awaiting approval of funding within the City’s budget to allow staff to initiate the work program to modify the Plan per City Council’s direction.

DISCUSSION
The primary issues for the project are conformance with the City’s General Plan and consistency with the City Code for a Planned Development Zoning.

General Plan Conformance
The site is currently designated Community Mixed-Use in the General Plan and is within the El Camino Real Focus Area. This designation provides flexibility to allow development that is either entirely commercial, completely residential or a combination of commercial and residential at a minimum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.10 for commercial use and between 20 to 36 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) for residential use.

City of Santa Clara Page 2 of 10 Printed on 6/10/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-718 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022
The General Plan vision for El Camino Real is to transform this Focus Area from a series of automobile-oriented commercial uses to a tree-lined pedestrian and transit-oriented corridor with a mix of retail and residential uses at higher intensities of development.

As noted above, the City has prepared a draft Specific Plan for the El Camino Real corridor that would include changes to the land use designations and policies for development along the corridor.

However, because the City has not acted on the draft Specific Plan, the site continues to be designated as Community Mixed-Use and governed by General Plan land use policies as it was designated in the 2010 General Plan update.

The proposed project is consistent with existing General Plan Policies as follows:

General Land Use Policies
· 5.3.1-P2: Encourage advance notification and neighborhood meetings to provide an opportunity for early community review of new development proposals. · 5.3.1-P26: Support a community-initiated planning process so that existing neighborhoods can participate in developing more detailed plans for street, landscape and pedestrian facility improvements.

Consistent with these policies, the applicant conducted public outreach through mailings and a virtual community meeting to involve neighboring property owners in the design of the project. Notices were mailed by the applicant to property owners within 500 feet of the project boundaries and interested parties.
· 5.3.1-P8: Work with property owners to improve or redevelop underutilized and vacant properties.
· 5.3.1-P9: Require that new development provide adequate public services and facilities, infrastructure, and amenities to serve the new employment or residential growth.

Consistent with these policies, the project would aggregate two commercial properties for the construction of 60 for-sale residential units consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats thereby increasing the type and tenure of the City’s housing supply. The project includes public and private improvements such as streetscape enhancements, private street and utilities, visitor parking, and landscaped open space to serve the development.
· 5.3.1-P10: Provide opportunities for increased landscaping and trees in the community, including requirements for new development to provide street trees and a minimum 2:1 on- or of-site replacement for trees removed as part of the proposal to help increase the urban forest and minimize the heat island effect.

Consistent with this policy, the proposed development plan includes landscaping of the site and street frontages with a variety of plant and tree species, and would replace the 16 trees removed with redevelopment at a ratio greater than the minimum requirement of 2:1, with a total of 90 trees. · 5.3.1-P12: Encourage convenient pedestrian connections within new and existing developments.

City of Santa Clara Page 3 of 10 Printed on 6/10/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-718 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022
Consistent with this policy, the project includes a tree-lined separated sidewalk along the street frontages of the project site to facilitate pedestrian access and link neighboring land uses. · 5.3.1-P16: Consolidate curb cuts with new development on arterial roadways to minimize pedestrian/vehicle conflicts at driveway locations and improve traffic flow.

Consistent with this policy, the project would eliminate the existing driveways along El Camino Real fronting the project site and replace them with a separated sidewalk that includes a planter strip adjacent to the curb and sidewalk behind, consistent with Complete Streets design standards, which would minimize the pedestrian and vehicle interface and improve traffic flow. A new curb-cut and driveway for site access and circulation would be provided along the Calabazas Boulevard frontage of the project site.
· P.3.1-P29: Encourage design of new development to be compatible with, and sensitive to, nearby existing and planned development, consistent with other applicable General Plan policies.

Consistent with this policy, the proposed project employs the City’s Transition Policies to taper mass and scale of the building clusters from three stories down to two stories in height at the rear where it interfaces with single-family residential development to the north. The proposed project is compatible in density and design of the three- and four-story residential development currently under construction abutting the project site to the east. One-story commercial development is located to the south across El Camino Real and east beyond Calabazas Creek.

El Camino Real Focus Area Policies
· 5.4.1-P2: Allow new development under Community Mixed-Use designation for exclusively residential or commercial uses provided that it meets the minimum requirements for Medium Density Residential or Community Commercial land use classifications. · 5.4.1-P5: Provide appropriate transition between new development in the Focus Area and adjacent uses consistent with General Plan Transition Policies. · 5.4.1-P6: Encourage lower profile development in area designated Community Mixed-Use in order to minimize land use conflicts with existing neighborhoods.

The project proposes exclusively residential development at 25 du/ac consistent with the density range of 20 - 36 du/ac for moderate density residential assigned to Community Mixed-Use General Plan land use designation for the site. Also consistent with the above policies, the design is compatible in height and density with existing and recently approved three- and four-story residential construction along the El Camino Real corridor. The project also transitions from threestories along the streetscape to two-stories at the rear of the property where it interfaces, and is separated by, a landscaped setback from neighboring single-family homes. · 5.4.1-P8: Orient ground floor retail and residential entries to the public sidewalk on El Camino Real.
· 5.4.1-P9: Residential development should include front doors, windows, stoops, porches, and bay windows or balconies along street frontages.

City of Santa Clara Page 4 of 10 Printed on 6/10/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-718 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022
Consistent with these policies, the buildings fronting El Camino Real and Calabazas Boulevard (Buildings 1, 2 and 3 on the site plan) are designed with front doors, windows and outdoor patios facing the adjacent street frontages.
· 5.4.1-P11: Locate parking at the side or rear of parcels and active uses along street frontages.

Consistent with this policy, the project design includes an attached garage for each unit that is oriented to and accessed from the private street internal to the project site. Visitor parking spaces are also located along the private street.
· 5.4.1-P16: Facilitate the implementation of streetscape improvements consistent with those illustrated in Figures 5.4-2.

Transition Policies
· 5.5.2-P1: Require that new development incorporate building articulation and architectural features, including front doors, windows, stoops, porches or bay windows along street frontages, to integrate new development into the existing neighborhoods.

Consistent with this policy, the project incorporates offsets along the building planes and a mixture of exterior materials and architectural features to create visual breaks and interest in the design for compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. Buildings 1 - 3 integrate into the neighborhood with orientation of the front doors, windows, and outdoor patios towards the public domain. Pedestrian paths connect the units to the public sidewalk and neighboring properties. · 5.5.2-P3: Implement site design solutions, such and landscaping and increased building setbacks, to provide buffers between nonresidential and residential uses. · 5.5.2-P5: Require that new development provide an appropriate transition to surrounding neighborhoods.

See responses to policies 5.3.1-P29, 5.4.1-P5 and 5.4-P6 above.

Zoning Conformance
The project site consists of two parcels that are zoned Thoroughfare Commercial (CT). The CT zoning designation is intended for auto-oriented uses on a major commercial thoroughfare and does not allow residential uses. This zoning was established on the property prior to the City’s General Plan update in 2010 and does not align with the current General Plan vision for the corridor. The El Camino Real Focus Area discourages auto-related uses and is intended to promote a mix of residential and retail uses (either horizontal or vertical) along a tree-lined pedestrian-oriented corridor.

As the City’s existing Zoning Code does not have a zoning district that would allow a for-sale residential development consisting of townhomes and flats, a rezone of the project site is necessary to construct the project.

The proposed rezone to PD would allow residential development consisting of townhomes and flats and would implement the General Plan vision for the current El Camino Real Focus Area. Chapter

18.54 establishes a process and the requirements for PD zoning districts. PD zoning districts are intended to allow for creative design solutions and land uses not otherwise allowed in standard zoning districts while maintaining compatibility with the existing community and allowing for City of Santa Clara Page 5 of 10 Printed on 6/10/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-718 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022
homeownership. The proposed PD zoning would establish standards for the residential development that are compatible with existing and approved land uses and development surrounding the project site. While the current General Plan designation of Community Mixed-Use typically requires a commercial element, General Plan policies allow an entirely residential use for sites along El Camino Real.

Affordable Housing
The proposed project is subject to the City’s inclusionary housing ordinance and would be required to designate nine of the 60 units to be reserved for qualifying home buyers based on an income level at or below the 100 percent of Area Median Income.

Site Design and Architecture
The project consists of 60 residential units distributed among eight three-story buildings that transition to two-stories at the rear of the property. Buildings 1 and 2 include a mix of flats and townhomes that front El Camino Real. The flats are located on level 1 with the townhomes above on levels 2 and 3. Building 3 consists of townhomes and is oriented to front onto Calabazas Boulevard.

Buildings 4 - 8 are composed of townhomes and located perpendicular to the rear property line in rows behind the private street. The maximum building height is 43.3 feet at top of stairwells and steps down to an average roof height of 36.8 feet for the three-story units. The end units of Buildings 5 - 8 terrace down to two stories (25.5 feet in height) where they interface with the single-family homes to the north. The buildings are located at landscaped setbacks that vary from 1.3 feet to 9.3 feet along El Camino Real, 21.4 feet along the northern property line adjacent to single-family homes and 10 feet along the east property line abutting new townhome development. Alternating private drive aisles and common landscaped paseos separate the building structures.

The unit mix includes four floor plan types made up of two bedroom units with either two or two and one-half baths ranging in size from 1,320 to 1,520 square feet of living area and three bedroom units with two and one-half or three baths with 1,445 to 1,740 square feet of living space. Each unit has private outdoor space in the form of either an enclosed outdoor patio, balcony, or rooftop deck ranging in size from 60 to 338 square feet.

The proposed building architecture has a modern design aesthetic that incorporates a mixture of stone veneer, composite lap siding and stucco finish with metal trellis, entry canopies and balcony railings for textural and visual interest. The use of divided light windows and alternating use of materials provides a rhythmic cohesion and symmetry in the design. Offsets in the building elevations, recessed windows, and varied roof forms (e.g. flat and shed) provide breaks in mass and scale of the buildings and roof structures.

Circulation and Parking
The existing curb-cuts and sidewalks along the project frontage would be removed and replaced with a single curb-cut along Calabazas Boulevard for site access and separated sidewalks along both street frontages that include a landscape strip next to the curb and sidewalk behind. Sidewalks along the project frontages and interior to the site would provide pedestrian access to the site and link adjacent land uses.

The development provides a mix of at-grade garage parking arrangements that include one-car parking, side-by-side two-car parking and tandem two-car parking for a total of 110 covered parking spaces and 10 open surface parking spaces distributed throughout the site.

City of Santa Clara Page 6 of 10 Printed on 6/10/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-718 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022
As the use of the site is residential, the tandem parking garages are anticipated to be functional as residents would be familiar with their garage design and manage their household parking needs. The proposed conditions of approval require that every garage be accessible for parking at all times and that each be wired to allow for electrical vehicle charging.

Landscaping and Open Space
The project includes a landscape plan for the site and public right-of-way that incorporates a mixture of plant species and trees for planting the common areas and setbacks, as well as the planter strips fronting the project site. The 16 trees removed with demolition of existing conditions on-site would be replaced in excess of the 2:1 requirement with a total of 90 trees. A new eight-foot good neighbor fence is proposed along the north and east property lines of the project site abutting adjacent development.

An accessible recreation space for shared public use is proposed at the southwest corner of the project site fronting Calabazas Boulevard. This area totals 2,396 square feet and includes landscaped open space, shade trees, accent paving, bench, and bike racks for use by the residents and the community.

As a condition of project approval, an HOA is to be established and CC&R’s recorded to manage and maintain on- and off-site improvements (including buildings, street, utilities, landscaping and fencing) in good condition for the life of the project.

City Council direction on height from June 2021
As noted above, in June of 2021, while discussing the El Camino Real Specific Plan, the City Council gave direction to staff to limit the height of the proposed Residential Corridor designation to a maximum height of two stories. The Residential Corridor designation supports townhouse development as proposed under the current project and so the City Council’s intention through this direction is to limit the height of townhouse development to a maximum of two stories. While the proposed Specific Plan includes height restrictions along the interface between new development and the existing single-family residences immediately to the north of the project site, the City Council did not consider these sufficient to avoid a potential land use incompatibility and further expressed concerns about the height of new development along the corridor having too great of a visual impact.

Accordingly, The Council directed staff to limit heights on Residential Corridor sites to a maximum of two stories in the next version of the draft Specific Plan.

As the current project is a Planned Development Zoning proposal, the City Council has the discretion to impose a similar height limit of two stories upon the subject project. However, the applicant has proposed to develop up to three stories on the site, as is common with contemporary townhouse development, and a three-story development would be consistent with the current General Plan designation.

Draft Specific Plan Commercial Requirement
During the City Council hearing in June 2021, several community members expressed concern over the loss of commercial uses that would occur with the development of the Specific Plan. Preserving commercial activity along the El Camino Real corridor has been an ongoing community objective and the draft Specific Plan identifies several sites that would be subject to a ground floor commercial requirement within new mixed-use development, but this requirement would not apply to the subject City of Santa Clara Page 7 of 10 Printed on 6/10/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-718 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022
property.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Initial Study and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) were prepared for the project by the environmental consultant firm David J. Powers & Associate, Inc., in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The MND and Notice of Availability were posted on the City’s website at
<https://www.santaclaraca.gov/our-city/departments-a-f/community-development/planningdivision/environmental-review-ceqa> and circulated for 30-day review on February 14, 2022 and ending on March 16, 2022, in accordance with CEQA requirements. The Planning Department received agency comments on the MND from Caltrans and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, and they are provided as Attachment 3 along with responses to comments for review.

CONCLUSION
The proposed project for the construction of a three-story residential development at 25 du/ac is consistent with the aforementioned General Plan land use policies, including the policies of the El Camino Real Focus Area, and the sites’ land use designation of Community Mixed Use, and therefore staff is recommending approval of the project as proposed by the Applicant. Nevertheless, the proposal is not consistent with the direction by City Council to lower the building heights within a future draft of the El Camino Real Specific Plan. A two-story residential project at this location would likely require reconfiguration of the site and building plans to achieve the proposed density of 25 du/ac and require a redesign and resubmittal for processing, review and subsequent action.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City for processing the requested application other than administrative time and expense typically covered by processing fees paid by the applicant.

COORDINATION
This report has been coordinated with the City Attorney’s Office.

PUBLIC CONTACT
On June 2, 2022, the notice of public hearing for this item was posted in three conspicuous places within 300 feet of the project site and was mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the project site boundaries. Newspaper notice of this item was published in The Weekly on June 1, 2022.

Public comments have been received and are provided in Attachment 10 of this staff report.

A virtual public outreach meeting was conducted by the applicant on December 16, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. to present the proposed project and engage the neighborhood community in the planning process.

Notices of the meeting were mailed by the applicant to property owners within 500 feet of the project City of Santa Clara Page 8 of 10 Printed on 6/10/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-718 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022
boundaries and interested parties and was also posted on the City’s website.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Adopt a resolution to recommend the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project.

2. Adopt a resolution to recommend the City Council approve a rezoning from Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) to Planned Development (PD) to allow a 60 condominium unit development consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, private street, landscaped open space, surface parking and site improvements, at a height of two and three stories. [Developer’s Proposal]

3. Adopt a resolution to recommend the City Council approve a rezoning from Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) to Planned Development (PD) to allow a 60 condominium unit development consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, private street, landscaped open space, surface parking and site improvements, but modified to limit the height to two stories. [Reduced Height Alternative]

4. Adopt a resolution to recommend the City Council approve the Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the land into residential condominiums and a common interest lot to serve the development.

5. Recommend the City Council deny the rezoning from Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) to Planned Development (PD) to allow development of 60 condominium units consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, private street, landscaped open space, surface parking and site improvements.

6. Recommend the City Council deny the Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the land into residential condominiums and a common interest lot to serve the development.

RECOMMENDATION
Alternatives:1, 2 and 4

1. Adopt a resolution to recommend the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project.

4. Adopt a resolution to recommend the City Council approve the Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the land into residential condominiums and a common interest lot to serve the development.

Reviewed by: Andrew Crabtree, Director of Community Development Approved by: Rajeev Batra, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Mitigated Negative Declaration

2. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

3. Responses to Comments received on the Mitigated Negative Declaration

4. Project Data
City of Santa Clara Page 9 of 10 Printed on 6/10/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-718 Agenda Date: 6/15/2022

5. Resolution Recommending Council Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

6. Resolution Recommending Council Approve the Rezone [Developer’s Proposal]

7. Resolution Recommending the Council Approve the Tentative Tract Map

8. Conditions of Rezoning Approval

9. Conditions of Tentative Tract Map Approval

10. Correspondence

11. Development Plans

12. Tentative Tract Map
City of Santa Clara Page 10 of 10 Printed on 6/10/2022
powered by Legistar™
Project Data
File: CEQ2020-01080, PLN2020-14674 and PLN2020-14705
Location: 3141 – 3155 El Camino Real
Applicant/ Owner: Oak Investment Group, LLC / Bowers Plaza GP CEQA Determination: Mitigated Negative Declaration
Existing Proposed
General Plan Designation Community Mixed Use Community Mixed Use Zoning District Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) Planned Development (PD) Lot Size 2.41 acres Same
Land Use Commercial Residential
Commercial Space 21,780 sq.ft. 0
Residential Units 0 60
Private Open Space N/A Yes.

Stories / Total Height One-story Three and two stories
(up to 43.3 feet)
Parking
Surface parking lots Single, tandem and side-byside attached garages and visitor spaces
Flood Zone X X
Aerial Map Project Site
Zoning Map – Thoroughfare Commercial (CT)
General Plan Map – Community Mixed Use Designation
3155 El Camino Real Residential Project - MND & MMRP Resolution Page 1 of 4 Rev: 11/22/17
RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA

TO ADOPT THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR
THE 3155 EL CAMINO REAL RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED
AT 3141 – 3155 EL CAMINO REAL, SANTA CLARA
PLN2020-014674 (Rezone)
PLN2020-14705 (Tentative Tract Map)
CEQ2020-01080 (Mitigated Negative Declaration)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on October 29, 2020, Oak Investment Group, LLC (“Applicant”) filed an application for the 2.14 acre site consisting of two contiguous parcels located at 3141 – 3155 El Camino Real with surface parking lots and seven one-story commercial buildings totaling 21,780 square feet (“Project Site”);
WHEREAS, the Applicant applied to rezone the Project Site from Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) to Planned Development (PD) to allow a 60-unit residential development consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, private street, and on- and off-site improvements (“Project”) as shown on the Development Plans, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; WHEREAS, the Project approvals will include Resolution No. _____ (“City Council Rezoning Resolution”); Resolution _____ (“City Council Tentative Tract Map Resolution”); and this California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Resolution (collectively, the “Approvals”); WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA, and the regulations implementing the Act, specifically 14 Cal. Code of Regs § 15070, this Project was determined after an Initial Study to identify potentially significant effects on the environment which could be avoided with the implementation of mitigation measures, resulting in the drafting of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”);
WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the MND was noticed and circulated for a 30-day public review period to the State Office of Planning and Research, Santa Clara County Clerk’s Office, 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project - MND & MMRP Resolution Page 2 of 4 Rev: 11/22/17
interested parties, and property owners within 500 feet of the Project Site from February 14, 2022 to March 15, 2022, where during that period comment letters were received from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, and along with the attached Responses to Comments Received on the MND are made part of the record; WHEREAS, on June 1, 2022, a newspaper notice for this item was published in The Weekly, a newspaper of general circulation for the City, for the Planning Commission meeting of June 15, 2022 and City Council meeting of July 12, 2022;
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2022 notices of the public meeting for the Planning Commission meeting of June 15, 2022 and City Council meeting of July 12, 2022 were posted in three conspicuous locations within 300 feet of the Project Site, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the Project Site boundaries;
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2022, the Planning Commission considered the Project, MND, MMRP and all pertinent information in the record, including public testimony, at the conclusion of which the planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council adopt the MND and MMRP, approve a rezoning to allow a 60 unit residential development consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, and approve the Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the land into residential condominiums and a common interest lot to serve the development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the MND prepared for the Project, City staff report pertaining to the MND and all evidence at a duly noticed public hearing on July 12, 2022. All these documents and evidence are herein incorporated by reference into this Resolution.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the City Council hereby finds that the above Recitals are true and correct and by this reference makes them a part hereof.
3155 El Camino Real Residential Project - MND & MMRP Resolution Page 3 of 4 Rev: 11/22/17

2. That the City Council hereby finds that all potentially significant environmental impacts that may directly or indirectly result from the Project would be reduced to a less-than-significant level by the mitigation measures specified in the MND and MMRP.

3. That the City Council hereby finds that the MND is complete, prepared in compliance with CEQA, and represents the independent judgment of the City Council.

4. That the City Council hereby finds that the MND and MMRP completed for this Project has been completed in compliance with CEQA, and that approval of this Project as mitigated will have no significant negative impacts on the area’s environmental resources, cumulative or otherwise, as the impacts as mitigated would fall within the environmental thresholds identified by CEQA.

5. That the City Council hereby adopts the MND and MMRP for the Project as required by the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code of Regs. § 15074).

6. The City Council hereby designates the Planning Division of the Community Development Department as the location for the documents and other material that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based and designates the Director of Community Development as the custodian of records.
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
3155 El Camino Real Residential Project - MND & MMRP Resolution Page 4 of 4 Rev: 11/22/17

7. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED

AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 12th DAY OFJULY, 20220, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCILORS:

NOES: COUNCILORS:

ABSENT: COUNCILORS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS:

ATTEST: ______________________________

NORA PIMENTEL, MMC

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA
Attachments incorporated by reference:

1. Mitigated Negative declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)

2. Responses to Comments on the MND

3. Development Plans
Resolution/ 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project Rezone Resolution Page 1 of 4 Rev: 11/22/17
RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA

TO APPROVE A REZONING FROM THOROUGHFARE

COMMERCIAL (CT) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) TO
ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 60
RESIDENTIAL UNITS LOCATED AT 314 – 3155 EL CAMINO

REAL, SANTA CLARA
PLN2020-014674 (Rezone)
PLN2020-14705 (Tentative Tract Map)
CEQ2020-01080 (Mitigated Negative Declaration)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on October 29, 2020, Oak Investment Group, LLC (“Applicant”) filed an application for the 2.14 acre site consisting of two contiguous parcels located at 3141 – 3155 El Camino Real with surface parking lots and seven one-story commercial buildings totaling 21,780 square feet (“Project Site”);
WHEREAS, the Applicant applied to rezone the Project Site from Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) to Planned Development (PD) to allow a 60-unit residential development consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, private streets, and on-and off-site improvements (“Project”) as shown on the Development Plans, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) prepared for the Project was noticed and circulated for a 30-day public review period from February 14, 2022 to March 16, 2022;
WHEREAS, the MND identified potential significant impacts of Project development that with implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) will reduce potential mitigation measures to less-than-significant and will be incorporated into the Project;
WHEREAS, Santa Clara City Code (SCCC) Section 18.112.030 provides for the review and recommendation of the City’s Planning Commission of all rezoning requests before action is to be taken by the City Council;
Resolution/ 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project Rezone Resolution Page 2 of 4 Rev: 11/22/17
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2022, the notice of public hearing for the June 15, 2022 Planning Commission meeting and the July 12, 2022 City Council meeting were posted for this item in at least three conspicuous locations within 300 feet of the Project Site and was mailed to property owners within a 500 foot radius of the Project Site boundaries; WHEREAS, on June 15, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, MND, MMRP and all pertinent information in the record, including public testimony, at the conclusion which the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council adopt the MND and MMRP, approve the rezoning to allow a 60-unit residential development consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, and approve a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the land into residential condominiums and a common interest lot to serve the development; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2022, the City Councill held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Rezoning application, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to give testimony and evidence offered in favor and in opposition to the Project.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the City Council hereby finds that the above Recitals are true and correct and by this reference makes them a part hereof.

2. That the City Council hereby rezones the Project Site from Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) to Planned Development (PD) to allow a 60 condominium residential development consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, as shown on the attached Development Plans and conditioned as specified in the attached Conditions of Rezoning Approval, incorporated herein by this reference.

3. Pursuant to SCCC Code Section 18.112.010, the City Council determines that the following findings exist in support of the rezoning:

A. The existing zoning is inappropriate or inequitable in that, the existing zoning for the Project Site does not allow residential development and creation of housing opportunities envisioned by the 2010-2035 General Plan. The Planned Development (PD) zoning would allow residential Resolution/ 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project Rezone Resolution Page 3 of 4 Rev: 11/22/17
development to implement the General Plan’s vision for the El Camino Real Focus Area more fully than the existing Commercial Thoroughfare (CT) zoning for the Project Site.

B. The proposed zone change will conserve property values, protect or improve the existing character and stability of the area in question, and will promote the orderly and beneficial development of such area in that the proposal redevelops two contiguous auto-oriented properties and visually improves the Project Site and surrounding neighborhood with physical and financial investment in the construction of a modern and visually aesthetic residential home ownership development with on-site parking, site improvements, landscaping, and streetscape enhancements.

C. The proposed zone change is required by public necessity, public convenience, or the general welfare of the City in that the proposed zone change provides residential development contemplated by the General Plan for the El Camino Real Focus Area that is designed to activate the streetscape, is pedestrian-oriented, supports public investments in existing and planned transit service along the El Camino Real transit corridor, and provides high quality homeownership opportunities to the City’s housing stock.

D. The proposed zone change would allow imaginative planning and design concepts to be utilized that would otherwise be restricted in other zoning districts in that the proposed zone change would allow flexibility in the development standards to construct for-sale condominiums that are compatible with existing and planned development within the El Camino Real Focus Area.

4. That based on the findings set forth in this resolution and the evidence in the City Staff Report, MND and MMRP, the City Council hereby rezones the Project Site to allow a 60 condominium residential development consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, as shown on the attached Development Plans and conditioned as specified in the attached Conditions of Rezoning Approval.
///
///

5. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.

Resolution/ 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project Rezone Resolution Page 4 of 4 Rev: 11/22/17

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED

AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 12th DAY OFJULY, 2022, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCILORS:

NOES: COUNCILORS:

ABSENT: COUNCILORS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS:

ATTEST: ______________________________

NORA PIMENTEL, MMC

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA
Attachments incorporated by reference:

1. Conditions of Rezoning Approval

2. Development Plans
Resolution/ 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project – Tentative Tract Map Resolution Page 1 of 5 Rev: 11/22/17
RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA

TO APPROVE THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR THE
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 3141 – 3155 EL CAMINO REAL, TO
SUBDIVIDE THE 2.14 ACRE PROJECT SITE INTO 60

RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS AND ONE COMMON LOT
PLN2020-014674 (Rezone)
PLN2020-14705 (Tentative Tract Map)
CEQ2020-01080 (Mitigated Negative Declaration)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on October 29, 2020, Oak Investment Group, LLC (“Applicant”) filed an application for the 2.14 acre site consisting of two contiguous parcels located at 3141 – 3155 El Camino Real with surface parking lots and seven one-story commercial buildings totaling 21,780 square feet (“Project Site”);
WHEREAS, the Applicant has simultaneously applied to rezone the Project Site from Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) to Planned Development (PD) to allow a 60-unit residential development consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, private street, and on- and off-site improvements (“Project”) as shown on the Development Plans, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the regulations implementing the Act, specifically 14 Cal. Code of Regs § 15070, this Project was determined after an Initial Study to identify potentially significant effects on the environment which could be reduced to less-than-significant with the implementation of mitigation measures, resulting in the drafting of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.05.210 of the Code of the City of Santa Clara (“SCCC”), a Tentative Tract Map shall be required for all divisions of land into five or more parcels; Resolution/ 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project – Tentative Tract Map Resolution Page 2 of 5 Rev: 11/22/17
WHEREAS, consistent with the proposed uses under the development plan, the proposal includes the division of the site into condominium and common lots, as shown on Exhibit “Tentative Tract Map” and attached hereto by this reference;
WHEREAS, on March 29, 2022, the Subdivision Committee determined that the application was complete and that the Tentative Tract Map be reviewed by the Planning Commission and the City Council in conformance with Section 17.05.300 of the SCCC as a Tentative Tract Map along with the Project;
WHEREAS, Section 17.05.300 (g) of the SCCC requires that the City conduct a public hearing before considering the approval of a Tentative Tract Map for the division of land; WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing on the Tentative Tract Map was published in The Weekly, a newspaper of general circulation for the City, on June 1, 2022 for the June 15, 2022 Planning Commission meeting and July 12, 2022 City Council meeting; WHEREAS on June 2, 2022, notices of the public hearing on the Tentative Tract Map were posted at least three conspicuous locations within 300 feet of the Project Site and were mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the Project Site boundaries for the June 15, 2022 Planning commission meeting and July 12, 2022 City Council meeting; WHEREAS, on June 15, 202, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, MND, MMRP and all pertinent information in the record, including public testimony, at the conclusion of which the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council adopt the MND and MMRP, approve the rezoning to allow a 60-unit residential development consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats, and approve the Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the land into residential condominium and a common interest lot to serve the development; and
WHEREAS, on July 12, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Tentative Tract Map application, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to Resolution/ 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project – Tentative Tract Map Resolution Page 3 of 5 Rev: 11/22/17
give testimony and the City Council considered the information presented in the Staff Report, MN, MMRP ad all verbal and written evidence.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the City Council hereby finds that the above Recitals are true and correct and by this reference makes them a part hereof.

2. That this Resolution incorporates, and by this reference makes a part hereof, that certain Tentative Tract Map, attached hereto as Exhibit “Tentative Tract Map”.

3. Tentative Tract Map Findings. Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 66426 and 66428 and SCCC Section 17.05.300(g), the City Council finds and determines that:

A. The Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land use and programs specified in the City’s General Plan in that the proposed Tentative Tract Map is to allow the development of 60 ownership residential units (consisting of 40 townhomes and 20 flats), private streets, on-site resident and visitor parking, common landscaped area, and on- and off-site improvements compatible with neighboring residential development and existing and planned development within the El Camino Real Focus Area, subject to conditions set forth in the Tentative Tract Map Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.

The project proposes a density of 25 dwelling units per acre, consistent with the site’s Community Mixed Use General Plan designation. The project is also consistent with the El Camino Real Focus Area policies.

B. The design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the City’s General Plan in that the Tentative Tract Map is subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit “Tentative Tract Map Conditions of Approval”, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.

C. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development in that the project is designed to provide high quality housing that is designed to be consistent with the on-going and Resolution/ 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project – Tentative Tract Map Resolution Page 4 of 5 Rev: 11/22/17
proposed development along El Camino Real. Moreover, the Project is designed to retain the contextual consistency of the corridor.

D. This site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development in that the Project Site is located in an urbanized area and allows for redevelopment consistent with the height, uses and development that are existing and planned in the surrounding area.

E. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious health problems in that the proposed residential subdivision will implement Covenants Conditions and Restrictions for operation and maintenance of the buildings, private street and site improvements, and does not propose the use of hazardous materials.

F. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and will not substantially or unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat in that the Project Site is located in an urbanized setting, on a previously developed site, and includes mitigation measures, as identified in the MND and MMRP, that reduce impacts to wildlife habitat to less-than-significant levels.

G. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that, the Project is designed to avoid encroachments and conflicts with public easements in the site design.

H. The Tentative Tract Map provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities, in that it would allow flexibility in the development standards to maximize the benefits of green building standards for site and building design.

4. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution and the evidence in the Staff Report, MND, MMRP, and such other evidence as received at the public hearings on this matter before the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of the Tentative Tract Map to the City Council, substantially in the form on file as shown in the “Tentative Tract Map” Resolution/ 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project – Tentative Tract Map Resolution Page 5 of 5 Rev: 11/22/17
attached hereto, subject to conditions of approval attached as “Conditions of Tentative Tract Map Approval” and hereby incorporated by this reference.

5. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED

AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE12th DAY OF JULY, 2022, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCILORS:

NOES: COUNCILORS:

ABSENT: COUNCILORS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS:

ATTEST: ______________________________

NORA PIMENTEL, MMC

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA
Attachments incorporated by reference:

1. Tentative Tract Map

2. Tentative Tract Map Conditions of Approval
________________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of Rezone Approval Page 1 of 13
PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080

CONDITIONS OF REZONE APPROVAL
In addition to complying with all applicable codes, regulations, ordinances and resolutions, the following conditions of approval are recommended:

GENERAL
A. If relocation of an existing public facility becomes necessary due to a conflict with the developer's new improvements, then the cost of said relocation shall be borne by the developer.

B. Comply with all applicable codes, regulations, ordinances, and resolutions.

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
A. The Developer agrees to defend and indemnify and hold City, its officers, agents, employees, officials and representatives free and harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, attorneys' fees, injuries, costs, and liabilities arising from any suit for damages or for equitable or injunctive relief which is filed by a third party against the City by reason of its approval of developer's project.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

The addressing diagram(s) shall include all proposed streets and all building floor plans. The addressing diagram(s) shall conform to Santa Clara City Manager Directive #5; Street Name and Building Number Changes, and Santa Clara Building Division Address Policy For Residential and Commercial Developments. The addressing diagram(s) shall indicate all unit numbers to be based off established streets, not alleys nor access-ways to garages. Allow a minimum of 10 working days for initial staff review. Please note city staff policy that existing site addresses typically are retired. Provide digital pdf printed from design software, not scanned from printed paper sheet.

BD2. Informational: The construction permit application drawings submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include a copy of the latest Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Zone Map: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home. The project drawings shall indicate how the project complies with the Santa Clara Flood Damage Prevention Code.

BD3. Informational: The construction permit application drawings submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Low Impact Development (LID) practices http://www.scvurppp-w2k.com/nd_wp.shtml. All projects that disturb more than one acre, or projects that are part of a larger development that in total disturbs more than one acre, shall comply with the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Best Management Practices (BMP): http://www.scvurppp-w2k.com/construction_bmp.shtml, and shall provide a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by a certified Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). All site drainage and grading permit applications submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include a city of Santa Clara "C3" data form, available on this web page:https://www.santaclaraca.gov/our-city/departments-g-z/public-works/environmentalprograms/stormwater-pollution-prevention and will be routed to a contract consultant for review.

BD4. Informational: no California construction code review is being done at this time. The construction permit application drawings submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include an overall California Building Code analysis, including; proposed use and occupancy of all spaces (19' CBC Ch. 3), all building heights and areas (19' CBC Ch. 5), all proposed types of construction (19' CBC Ch. 6), all proposed fire and smoke protection features, including all types of all fire rated penetrations proposed (19' CBC Ch. 7), all proposed interior finishes fire resistance (19' CBC Ch. 8), all fire protection systems proposed (19' CBC Ch. 9), and all means of egress proposed (19' CBC Ch. 10). -Noncombustible exterior wall, floor, and roof finishes are strongly encouraged. ________________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of Rezone Approval Page 2 of 13
PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
 During construction retaining a single company to install all fire rated penetrations is highly recommended.
 The grade level lobbies shall be min. 1 hour rated all sides and above.  All stair shafts shall be min. 1 hour rated.
 All elevator shafts shall be min. 1 hour rated.
 All trash chute shafts shall be min. 1 hour rated.
 Recommendation: provide a minimum of two trash chutes; one for recyclables, one for trash, each trash chute to be routed down to a grade level trash collection room.  Any trash rooms shall be min. 1 hour rated all sides and above.

BD5. Informational: The overall project construction permit application shall include the geotechnical, architectural, structural, energy, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing drawings, and calculations. Prior to the issuance of the overall project construction permit, a conditions of approval review meeting must be held in city hall, which meeting must be attended by the on-site field superintendent(s). The meeting will not be held without the attendance of the on-site field superintendent(s). The on-site grading permit shall be a separate permit application to the Building Division.

BD6. Informational: Temporary Certificates of Occupancy will not be routinely issued and will be considered on a very limited basis only when there is a clear and compelling reason for city staff to consider a TCO. A TCO will be approved only after all applicable City staff have approved in writing; Planning, P.W./ Engineering, Fire Prev., Santa Clara Water, Silicon Valley Power, and any other applicable agencies such as the Santa Clara County Health Dept., with the Building Division being the final approval of all TCO.'s.

HOUSING & COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION
H1. In accordance with the Santa Clara City Code chapter 17.40, this project is subject to the affordable housing requirements for the proposed 60 units of for-sale residential development. The Applicant shall provide not less than 9 units or fifteen percent (15%) of the units to affordable households made available at affordable sales prices to extremely low, very low, low and/or moderate-income households so long as the distribution of affordable units averages to a maximum of 100 percent Area Median Income. The Affordable Unit shall have prices set in accordance with the City’s Below Market Purchase (BMP) Program Policies and Procedures Manual (subject to updates and changes).

H2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the Developer shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) with the City that will determine the Affordable Sales Price, identify the actual unit to be sold as the Affordable Unit, and apply all terms and covenants guaranteeing the prescribed affordability, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. There is a fee for the AHA preparation in the amount of $3,771 which will be due prior to execution of the AHA.

PLANNING DIVISION
P1. Submit plans for final architectural review to the Planning Division for Architectural Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Said plans to include, but not be limited to: site plans, floor plans, elevations, landscaping, lighting, signage, and stormwater management plan.

P2. The Developer must provide third party verification of the stormwater management plan for conformance with C3 requirements as part of the architectural submittal.

P3. Submit complete landscape plans, including irrigation plan and composite utility and tree layout overlay plan, for Planning Department review and approval with installation of required landscaping prior to the issuance of occupancy and or final building permits. Landscape plan to include type and size of proposed trees. Type and size of tree replacement on project site shall be at the direction of the City Arborist and require Planning review and approval. Coordinate with the Street Department and City Arborist for the type, location, installation, and maintenance of street trees fronting the project site along the public right-of-way. Installation of root barriers and super-soil may be required with the installation of trees where electric, water, and sewer utilities are in proximity.

P4. The overlay plan is to show the location of all utilities, storm drains, catch basins, sewer mains, joint trenches, building footprints, driveways, walkways, and trees. Trees are required to be 10 feet from public water, storm and sewer facilities unless a City approved Tree Root Barrier (TRB) is used. If a ________________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of Rezone Approval Page 3 of 13
PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
City approved TRB is used the TRB must be a minimum of five feet from the public water, storm and sewer facility with the tree behind the TRB and specified on the plan. Landscaping installation shall meet City water conservation criteria in a manner acceptable to the Director of Planning and Inspection.

P5. Submit as-built on-site plans prepared by a registered civil engineer showing all utilities serving the subject property.

P6. Obtain required permits and inspections from the Building Official and comply with the conditions thereof. As this project involves land area of one acre or more, the Developer shall file a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the State Water Resources Control Board prior to issuance of any building permit for grading, or construction; a copy of the NOI shall be sent to the City Building Inspection Division. A stormwater pollution prevention plan is also required with the NOI.

P7. The Developer shall submit a truck hauling route for demolition, soil, debris and material removal, and construction to the Director of Community Development for review and approval prior to the issuance of demolition and building permits.

P8. Minor changes to individual homes, landscaping, or other minor plan elements would be subject to Planning Division review and approval of a Minor Adjustment to an approved project, or through Architectural Review, subject to the discretion of the Director of Community Development.

P9. Project site landscaping shall be maintained in good condition throughout the life of the Project and no trees shall be removed without City review and approval. Trees permitted by the City for removal shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio with 24-inch box specimen tree, or equal alternative as approved by the Director of Community Development.

P10. Developer shall submit to the City Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) or equivalent instrument assigning and governing perpetual maintenance of the common lot/private street in good condition for the life of the Project, prior to issuance of building permits. Said document shall be recorded along with the Title for each property with the Santa Clara County Recorder’s Office.

P11. The Covenant, Conditions and Restrictions for this project shall include language that precludes exclusive storage use of the garage and obstruction of parking spaces in the garage by storage, shall and requires property owners to maintain garages for parking purposes.

P12. Garages shall be accessible for parking and labeled as such on the building permit plans.

P13. Overhead garage storage shall be offered as a design option in each of the units.

P14. Provide automatic garage door openers and roll-up garage doors.

P15. Each garage shall be equipped with electrical vehicle charging stations.

P16. Signage shall be provided in the guest parking area closest to the live/work units reserving parking for business patrons during business hours.

P17. HVAC units shall be screened from view along the public right-of-way.

P18. Individual garbage and recycling containers shall be kept out of sight from the public right of way and private driveway until collection day.

P19. Applicant shall comply with all the construction and on-going mitigation measures described in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting Program shall be included in all construction plan sets.

P20. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved roads) shall be watered two times per day, except on days when rain occurs.

P21. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto the adjacent public right-of-way shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweeper at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping shall be prohibited.

P22. Additional dust and noise abatement measures may be on the project site at the discretion of the Community Development Director to provide additional sound attenuation and fugitive dust abatement as described in the project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. This may include additional noise monitoring and installation of a temporary noise control blanket barrier, if necessary, along building facades facing construction sites if conflicts occurred which are irresolvable by proper scheduling.
________________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of Rezone Approval Page 4 of 13
PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
FIRE
F1. Fire apparatus access roadways shall be provided so that all portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the buildings are located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. Ariel access roadways shall be located a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the protected building, or the project team will be required to mitigate the lack of compliance. If these conditions cannot be met the project team will be required to complete an Alternative materials, design and methods of construction and equipment application. The required mitigation measure will be determined by the Fire Department.

F2. At time of Building Permit application provide documentation to show the minimum required fire-flow for the building based on the construction type and square footage in accordance with the California Fire Code, Appendix B, Table B105.1 can be met. A 75% reduction in fire-flow is allowed with the installation of an automatic fire sprinkler system designed in accordance with California Fire Code § B105.2. The resulting fire-flow shall not be less than 1,500 gallons per minute (or 1,000 gallons per minute for NFPA 13 fire sprinkler systems) minute for the prescribed duration.

F3. At time of Building Permit application, the required number, location, and distribution of fire hydrants for the building based on the California Fire Code, Appendix C, Table C102.1 shall be incorporated into the construction documents. The required number of fire hydrants shall be based on the fire-flow before the reduction.

F4. At time of Building Permit application, construction documents for proposed fire apparatus access, location of fire lanes and construction documents and hydraulic calculations for fire hydrant systems shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention and Hazardous Materials Division.

F5. Prior to the start of construction, fire protection water supplies shall be installed and made serviceable prior to the time of construction or prior to combustible materials being moved onsite, unless an approved alternative method of protection is approved by the Fire Prevention and Hazardous Materials Division.

F6. At time of Building Permit application, construction documents for the fire department apparatus access roads are required submitted to the Fire Prevention and Hazardous Materials Division. Access roadways shall be provided to comply with all of the following requirements:
a. Fire apparatus access roadways shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved when any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building.
b. Fire apparatus access roadways shall have a “minimum” width of a fire apparatus access roadway for Engines is 20 feet. The “minimum” width of roadways for aerial apparatus is 26 feet. Ariel access roadways shall be located a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the protected building and the sides of the building requiring access shall be approved by the Fire Department. Trees, overhead wiring, etc. shall not conflict with any means of fire department access.
c. Fire access roadways shall have a “minimum” unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. Aerial apparatus access roads may require additional vertical clearance. d. Fire access roadways shall All fire department access roadways shall be an all-weather surface designed to support the imposed load of fire apparatus with a gross vehicle weight of 75,000- pounds.
e. Fire apparatus access roadways shall have a “minimum” inside turning radius for fire department access roadways shall be 36 feet or greater. f. Dead-end fire apparatus access roadways in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for turning around.
g. Traffic calming devices are not permitted on any designated fire access roadway, unless approved by the Fire Prevention & Hazardous Materials Division. h. All Fire Department Access roadways shall be recorded as an Emergency Vehicle Access Easement (EVAE) on the final map. No other instruments will be considered as substitutions such as P.U.E, Ingress/Egress easements and/or City Right-of-Ways. ________________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of Rezone Approval Page 5 of 13
PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
i. All gates installed on designated fire department access roads are required to electrically automatic powered gates. Gates shall be provided with an emergency battery power supply, or shall be a fail-safe design, allowing the gate to be pushed open without the use of special knowledge or equipment. To control the automatic gates a detector/strobe switch shall be installed to allow emergency vehicles (e.g., fire, police, ems) to flash a vehicle mounted strobe light towards the detector/strobe switch, which in turn overrides the system and opens the gate.

The gates shall be equipped with a TOMAR Strobe Switch or 3M OPTICOM Detector to facilitate this override. Said device shall be mounted at a minimum height of seven feet (7’) above the adjacent road surface and is subject to an acceptance test witnessed by the Fire Department prior to final approval of the project.

F7. Provisions shall be made for Emergency Responder Radio Coverage System (ERRCS) equipment, including but not limited to pathway survivability in accordance with Santa Clara Emergency Responder Radio Coverage System Standard.

F8. Prior to issuance of a Building Demo Permit, Steps 1 through 3 summarized below must be addressed during the planning phase of the project. Submit Phase II environmental documents:
a. Step 1 – Hazardous Materials Closure (HMCP): This is a permit is issued by the Santa Clara Fire Department, Fire Prevention & Hazardous Materials Division. Hazardous materials closure plans are required for businesses that used, handled, or stored hazardous materials. While required prior to closing a business this is not always done by the business owner, and therefore should be part of the developer’s due diligence. The hazardous materials closure plans demonstrate that hazardous materials which were stored, dispensed, handled, or used in the facility/business are safely transported, disposed of, or reused in a manner that eliminates any threat to public health and environment.
b. Step 2 – Site Mitigation: Site mitigation is the cleanup or management of chemical contaminants in soil, soil vapor or groundwater. The type and extent of contamination on site(s) governs which of the regulatory agencies noted below will supervise the cleanup.  Santa Clara Fire Department, Fire Prevention & Hazardous Materials Division (CUPA)  Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
 State Water Resources Control Board
 Santa Clara County, Department of Environmental Health. c. Step 3 – Community Development, Building Division Demolition Application: For the majority of projects within the City of Santa Clara, Steps 1 and/or 2 described above need to be completed prior to proceeding to demolition application in order to avoid permit approval delays. The purpose of a demolition permit is to ensure that the parcel is clear of debris and other health hazard material (lead, asbestos, etc.) and that the utility connections have been plugged and sealed.”
If the project intends to contract with a State or County Agency for onsite/offsite environmental remediation activities the following documentation shall be provided to the Fire Prevention & Hazardous Materials Division prior to issuance of a Building Permit for demolition or grading:
 Oversight agency case number; and
 Oversight mangers contact name, phone number.

0.432-acres. The equivalent fee due in lieu of parkland dedication is therefore $2,668,080. Final calculations will depend upon the actual number and type of units and the mix of parkland dedicated and remaining fee due, at the discretion of the City.

PR2. Application for Credit. It is unlikely the Project could achieve the requirements needed to qualify for credit; therefore, the Project would not be eligible for 50% credit against any fees due in lieu of parkland dedication.
________________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of Rezone Approval Page 6 of 13
PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
PR3. Dwelling Unit Tax. A dwelling unit tax (DUT) is also due based on the number of units and additional bedrooms per City Code Chapter 3.15. The Project mix includes 28 two- bedroom units and 32 threebedroom units for a total DUT of $1,360.

PR4. Calculations may change if the number of units change, if any areas do not conform to the Ordinance and City Code Chapter 17.35, and/or if the fee schedule for new residential development fees due in lieu of parkland dedication changes before this Project is deemed complete by Planning.

PUBLIC WORKS

ENGINEERING
E1. Obtain site clearance through Public Works Department prior to issuance of Building Permit. Site clearance will require payment of applicable development fees. Other requirements may be identified for compliance during the site clearance process. Contact Public Works Department at (408) 615-3000 for further information.

E2. All work within the public right-of-way and/or public easement, which is to be performed by the Developer/Owner, the general contractor, and all subcontractors shall be included within a Single Encroachment Permit issued by the City Public Works Department. Issuance of the Encroachment Permit and payment of all appropriate fees shall be completed prior to commencement of work, and all work under the permit shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permit.

E3. Submit public improvement plans prepared in accordance with City Public Works Department procedures which provide for the installation of public improvements. Plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to approval and recordation of parcel map and/or issuance of building permits.

E4. All work within the State right-of-way shall require a Caltrans encroachment permit.

E5. All work within the Santa Clara Valley Water District right-of-way shall require a Santa Clara Valley Water District encroachment permit.

E6. Existing non-standard or non-ADA compliant frontage improvements shall be replaced with current City standard frontage improvements as directed by the City Engineer or his designee.

E7. Damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk within the public right-of-way along property’s frontage shall be repaired or replaced (to the nearest score mark) in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer or his designee. The extents of said repair or replacement within the property frontage shall be at the discretion of the City Engineer or his designee.

E8. Applicant will permanently block vehicular access to the bridge prior to issuance of building permit (not including demolition permit). Within the single Encroachment Permit for the project, Applicant shall reconstruct the street median, fence, and curb and gutter to match the existing conditions on either side of the bridge. Prior to occupancy, Applicant will have completed the removal of the bridge and closed out all permits or Applicant will post a bond with the City for $350,000 to be held until bridge removal and permit closeout is completed.

E9. The sanitary sewer (SS) discharge information (i.e., building use, square footage, point of connection to the public system, and 24-hour average and peak SS flow graphs for the peak day, showing average daily and peak daily SS flows) submitted by the developer was analyzed and determined that there should be enough SS conveyance capacity to accommodate the proposed development without adding it to the City’s Sanitary Sewer Hydraulic Model (SSHM).

E10. Sanitary sewer laterals shall be minimum 6” diameter with 2% slope from property line cleanout to City sanitary sewer main. Connections shall be minimum 5’ from existing manholes.

E11. Sanitary sewer and storm drain mains and laterals shall be outside the drip line of mature trees or ten (10) feet clear of the tree trunk, whichever is greater, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

E12. Provide root barriers when the drip line of the mature trees covers the sidewalk. Root barriers for sidewalk protection shall be 16' long or extend to drip line of the mature tree, whichever is greater, and be 1.5' deep, and centered on trees. Root barriers for curb and gutter protection shall be 16' long or extend to drip line of the mature tree, whichever is greater, and be 2’ deep, and centered on trees.

E13. Developer shall provide a complete storm drain study for the 10-year and 100-year storm events. The grading plans shall include the overland release for the 100-year storm event and any localized flooding ________________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of Rezone Approval Page 7 of 13
PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
areas. System improvements, if needed, will be at developer’s expense. Show storm drain overland release arrows include limits of ponding.

E14. Existing non-standard or non-ADA compliant frontage improvements shall be replaced with current City standard frontage improvements as directed by the City Engineer or his designee.

E15. Dedicate, as required, on-site easements for new and existing utilities and new sidewalks by Subdivision Map or approved instrument at time of development. Developer shall pay applicable easement preparation/processing fee.

E16. Dedicate a sidewalk easement for the sidewalk and driveway portions within private property and pay the easement preparation fee. Sidewalk easement shall be 1’ behind proposed back-of-walk if there is landscaping behind sidewalk and/or at the proposed back-of-walk with a cold joint if there is hardscape concrete behind sidewalk.

E17. Obtain Council approval of a resolution ordering vacation of existing public easement(s) proposed to be abandoned, if any, through Public Works Department, and pay all appropriate fees, prior to start of construction
E18. After City Council approval of the Tentative Map, submit 10 copies of the Subdivision Map, prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor or a Registered Civil Engineer with Land Surveyor privileges to the Engineering Department. The submittal shall include a title report, closure calculations, and all appropriate fees.

E19. Half width of Calabazas Boulevard along the property frontage shall be treated with 2” grind and overlay.

E20. El Camino Real frontage from lip of gutter to the southern edge of the number 3 lane shall be treated with a 2” grind and overlay.

E21. Provide 2 Class II bicycle parking spaces on-site. Class I bicycle parking is not required since garages are provided.

E22. Improvements near proposed driveways must be in accordance with City Standard Detail TR-9 for visibility clearance/triangle of safety.

E23. Construct minimum 5-foot wide sidewalk along the project frontage.

E24. Construct driveways in accordance with City Standard Detail ST-8.

E25. Remove and reconstruct curb ramps and porkchop island at northeast corner of El Camino Real and Calabazas Boulevard Northbound in accordance with Caltrans Standard Plan A88A, A88B and encroachment permit requirements.

E26. Along project frontage of El Camino Real, install R28S(CA) signs with double arrow to implement parking removal approved by City Council via Resolution 22-9047.

STREETS DIVISION
Landscape
L1. Include City of Santa Clara Tree Preservation/City Arborist specifications on all improvement plans.

L2. No cutting of any part of private trees, including roots, shall be done without securing prior approval of the City Arborist. Tree trimming/removal shall be done in accordance to the City of Santa Clara Tree Preservation/City Arborist specifications and with direct supervision of a certified arborist (Certification of International Society of Arboriculture).

L3. Identified existing mature trees to be maintained. Prepare a tree protection plans for review and approval by the City of Santa Clara prior to any demolition, grading or other earthwork in the vicinity of existing trees on the site.

Solid Waste
SW1. None submitted.

Stormwater
ST1. Stormwater treatment facilities shall be designed and installed to achieve the site design measures throughout their life in accordance to the SCVURPPP C.3 Stormwater Handbook. Prior to City’s issuance of Building or Grading Permits, the applicant shall develop a Final Stormwater Management Plan, update the C.3 Data Form, the Special Project Narratives and Worksheet (as appropriate). ________________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of Rezone Approval Page 8 of 13
PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
ST2. The Final Stormwater Management Plan and all associated calculations shall be reviewed and certified by a qualified 3rd party consultant from the SCVURPPP List of Qualified Consultants, and a 3 rd party review letter shall be submitted with the Plan. Include C.3 Stormwater Treatment Facilities Construction General Notes on improvement plans.

ST3. For project that disturbs a land area of one acre or more, the applicant shall file a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the State Water Resources Control Board for coverage under the State Construction General Permit (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ) prior to issuance of any building permit for grading or construction. A copy of NOI with WDID number shall be provided to the City Building Inspection Division, along with a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP).

ST4. Active projects with NOI will be inspected by the City once per month during the wet season (October – April). The applicant shall prepare an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan.

ST5. The applicant shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) into construction plans and incorporate post-construction water runoff measures into project plans. Include the SCVURPPP Countywide Construction BMPs Plan Sheet with the plans.

ST6. During the construction phase, all stormwater control measures shall be inspected for conformance to approved plans by a qualified 3rd party consultant from the SCVURPPP List of Qualified Consultants, and a 3rd party concurrence letter on the C.3 facilities construction shall be submitted to the Public Works Department. The City reserves the right to review the 3rd party inspection reports on the C.3 stormwater facilities installation. As-Built drawing shall be submitted to the Public Works Department.

Building occupancy will not be issued until all stormwater treatment measures have been adequately inspected and O&M Agreement is executed. For more information, contact Rinta Perkins at (408) 615-30081 or [email protected].

ST7. Media Filter vaults shall be inspected by a third-party reviewer and/or manufacturer representative for conformance with the details and specifications.

ST8. Soils for bioretention facilities must meet the specifications accepted by the Water Board. If percolation rate test of the bioretention soil mix is not performed on-site, a certification letter from the supplier verifying that the soil meets the specified mix is required.

ST9. The property owner shall enter into an Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement with the City for all installed stormwater treatment measures and full trash capture devices in perpetuity. Applicants should contact Public Works Dept. - Environmental Services at (408) 615-3080 or [email protected] for assistance completing the Agreement. For more information and to download the most recent version of the O&M Agreement, visit the City’s stormwater resources website at http://santaclaraca.gov/stormwater. For permeable pavement and underground media filter, inspection of these facilities is to be done annually.

ST10. Any site design measures used to reduce the size of stormwater treatment measures shall not be installed for the project without the written approval from the City, installing the corresponding resizing of other stormwater treatment measures and an amendment of the property’s O&M Agreement.

ST11. Developer shall install an appropriate stormwater pollution prevention message such as “No Dumping – Flows to Bay” on any storm drains located on private property.

ST12. Floor drains within trash enclosures shall be plumbed to the sanitary sewer system and not connected to the City’s storm drain system.

ST13. Decorative and recreational water features such as fountains, pools, and ponds shall be designed and constructed to drain to the sanitary sewer system only.

ST14. The use of architectural copper is discouraged. If such material is used, all wastewater generated by the installation, cleaning, treating, or washing of the surface of copper architectural features, including copper roofs, shall not be discharged to the City’s storm drain system.

SILICON VALLEY POWER
SVP1. Existing streetlights on El Camino are decorative and should remain protected in place. If any relocation of decorative streetlights is required they shall be replaced with the same style/color by SVP with actual costs paid by the developer.

SVP2. Existing Electrical Pedestal (for street lighting) on concrete base is to be relocated. If placed within the landscape stripe will require bollards.
________________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of Rezone Approval Page 9 of 13
PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
SVP3. Trees along north side of the site must maintain 10’ clearance to electric lines when fully mature. Per planting plan “OLE SH with a mature height of 20 feet” will be used.

SVP4. Existing Transformer (T20048) on the site will need to be relocated prior to its removal, since it feeds the street lighting.

SVP5. New site transformer will be above grade. No below grade equipment is used within Santa Clara.

Bollards will be required.

SVP6. Clearances: (To be Maintained throughout detail design) a. EQUIPMENT
i. Ten (10) foot minimum clearance is required in front of equipment access doors. (UG1000 sheet 11)
ii. Five (5) foot minimum clearance from pad is required on sides without equipment access doors. (UG1000 sheet 11)
iii. Eighteen (18) foot minimum width, shall be provided and maintained on one side of the equipment pad to allow an electric dept. line truck to drive up next to the pad for installation and maintenance of equipment. (UG1000 Sheet 11). iv. Barrier pipes are required only on sides accessible to vehicles. (UG1000 Sheet 12).

1. Thirty (30) inches from side of equipment sides.

2. Forty-Eight (48) inches in front of access doors.
a. Barrier Pipes in front of access doors shall be removable. b. CONDUITS
i. Five (5) foot minimum longitudinal clearance between new conduits or piping systems (open trench installation) and any existing or proposed SVP conduit system. This is for longitudinal. (UG1250 sheet 5)
ii. Twelve (12) inch minimum vertical clearance between new conduit/pipes installed perpendicular to existing SVP conduits for open trench installations. (UG1000 sheet 36, UG1250 Sheet 6)
iii. Three (3) foot six (6) inches clearance is required from poles for open trench installation.

Exceptions are for riser conduit. (UG1250 Sheet 7)
iv. Three (3) foot minimum clearance is required between signposts, barrier pipes or bollards, fence posts, and other similar structures. (UG1250 sheet 10). v. Five (5) foot minimum from new splice boxes, pull boxes, manholes, vaults, or similar subsurface facilities. (UG1000 sheet 8)
vi. Five (5) foot minimum clearance from walls, footings, retaining wall, landscape planter, tree root barrier or other subsurface wall or structure. (UG1250 sheet 9). vii. Five (5) foot minimum clearance is required between fire hydrant thrust block. The thrust block extends 5’ foot on either side of the fire hydrant in line with the radial water pipe connected to the hydrant.
c. VAULTS/MANHOLES
i. Ten (10) foot minimum clearance is required between adjacent Vaults or Manholes. ii. Five (5) foot minimum clearance is required between adjacent conduits. iii. Minimum 36” from face of curb, or bollards required. d. Poles (Electrolier, Guy Stub poles, service clearance poles, self-supporting steel poles and lighting poles.)
i. Three (3) foot six (6) inches clearance is required from poles for open trench installation.

Exceptions are for riser conduit. (UG1250 Sheet 7)
e. Guy Anchors
i. Five (5) foot minimum clearance is required between center of anchor line and any excavation area. (UG1250 sheet 15).
f. Trees
i. OH 1230 for Overhead Lines
ii. SD 1235 for Tree Planting Requirements near UG Electric Facilities SVP7. Reference listed SVP standards for clearances.
a. Installation of Underground Substructures by Developers ________________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of Rezone Approval Page 10 of 13
PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
b. UG1250 – Encroachment Permit Clearances from Electric Facilities c. UG0339 – Remote Switch Pad
d. OH1230 – Tree Clearances From Overhead Electric Lines e. SD1235 – Tree Planting Requirements Near Underground Electric Facilities SVP8. Prior to submitting any project for Electric Department review, applicant shall provide a site plan showing all existing utilities, structures, easements and trees. Applicant shall also include a “Load Survey” form showing all current and proposed electric loads. A new customer with a load of 500KVA or greater or 100 residential units will have to fill out a “Service Investigation Form” and submit this form to the Electric Planning Department for review by the Electric Planning Engineer. Silicon Valley Power will do exact design of required substructures after plans are submitted for building permits.

SVP9. The Developer shall provide and install electric facilities per Santa Clara City Code chapter 17.15.210.

SVP10. Electric service shall be underground. See Electric Department Rules and Regulations for available services.

SVP11. Installation of underground facilities shall be in accordance with City of Santa Clara Electric Department standard UG-1000, latest version, and Santa Clara City Code chapter 17.15.050.

SVP12. Underground service entrance conduits and conductors shall be “privately” owned, maintained, and installed per City Building Inspection Division Codes. Electric meters and main disconnects shall be installed per Silicon Valley Power Standard MS-G7, Rev. 2.

SVP13. The developer shall grant to the City, without cost, all easements and/or right of way necessary for serving the property of the developer and for the installation of utilities (Santa Clara City Code chapter

17.15.110).

SVP14. If the “legal description” (not “marketing description”) of the units is condominium or apartment, then all electric meters and services disconnects shall be grouped at one location, outside of the building or in a utility room accessible directly from the outside. If they are townhomes or single-family residences, then each unit shall have its own meter, located on the structure. A double hasp locking arrangement shall be provided on the main switchboard door(s). Utility room door(s) shall have a double hasp locking arrangement or a lock box shall be provided. Utility room door(s) shall not be alarmed.

SVP15. If transformer pads are required, City Electric Department requires an area of 17’ x 16’-2”, which is clear of all utilities, trees, walls, etc. This area includes a 5’-0” area away from the actual transformer pad. This area in front of the transformer may be reduced from an 8’-0” apron to a 3’-0”, providing the apron is back of a 5’-0” min. wide sidewalk. Transformer pad must be a minimum of 10’-0 from all doors and windows, and shall be located next to a level, drivable area that will support a large crane or truck.

SVP16. All trees, existing and proposed, shall be a minimum of five (5) feet from any existing or proposed Electric Department facilities. Existing trees in conflict will have to be removed. Trees shall not be planted in PUE’s or electric easements.

SVP17. Any relocation of existing electric facilities shall be at Developer’s expense.

SVP18. Electric Load Increase fees may be applicable.

SVP19. The developer shall provide the City, in accordance with current City standards and specifications, all trenching, backfill, resurfacing, landscaping, conduit, junction boxes, vaults, street light foundations, equipment pads and subsurface housings required for power distribution, street lighting, and signal communication systems, as required by the City in the development of frontage and on-site property.

Upon completion of improvements satisfactory to the City, the City shall accept the work. Developer shall further install at his cost the service facilities, consisting of service wires, cables, conductors, and associated equipment necessary to connect a customer to the electrical supply system of and by the City. After completion of the facilities installed by developer, the City shall furnish and install all cable, switches, street lighting poles, luminaries, transformers, meters, and other equipment that it deems necessary for the betterment of the system (Santa Clara City Code chapter 17.15.210 (2)).

SVP20. Electrical improvements (including underground electrical conduits along frontage of properties) may be required if any single non-residential private improvement valued at $200,000 or more or any series of non-residential private improvements made within a three-year period valued at $200,000 or more (Santa Clara City Code Title 17 Appendix A (Table III)). ________________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of Rezone Approval Page 11 of 13
PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
SVP21. Non-Utility Generator equipment shall not operate in parallel with the electric utility, unless approved and reviewed by the Electric Engineering Division. All switching operations shall be “Open-TransitionMode”, unless specifically authorized by SVP Electric Engineering Division. A Generating Facility Interconnection Application must be submitted with building permit plans. Review process may take several months depending on size and type of generator. No interconnection of a generation facility with SVP is allowed without written authorization from SVP Electric Engineering Division.

SVP22. Encroachment permits will not be signed off by Silicon Valley Power until Developers Work substructure construction drawing has been completed.

SVP23. All SVP-owned equipment is to be covered by an Underground Electric Easement (U.G.E.E.) This is different than a PUE. Only publicly owned dry utilities can be in a UGEE. Other facilities can be in a joint trench configuration with SVP, separated by a 1’ clearance, providing that they are constructed simultaneously with SVP facilities. See UG 1000 for details.

SVP24. Proper clearance must be maintained from all SVP facilities, including a 5’ clearance from the outer wall of all conduits. This is in addition to any UGEE specified for the facilities. Contact SVP before making assumptions on any clearances for electric facilities.

SVP25. Transformers and Switch devices can only be located outdoors. These devices MAY be placed 5’ from an outside building wall, provided that the building wall in that area meets specific requirements. (See UG 1000 document for specifics) EXAMPLE: If there are any doors, windows, vents, overhangs or other wall openings within 5’ of the transformer, on either side, then the transformer MUST be 10’ or more away from the building. These clearances are to be assumed to be clear horizontally 5’ in either direction and vertically to the sky.

SVP26. All existing SVP facilities, onsite or offsite, are to remain unless specifically addressed by SVP personnel by separate document. It is the Developers responsibility to maintain all clearances from equipment and easements. Developer to contact SVP outside of the PCC process for clear definitions of these clearance requirements. Developer should not assume that SVP will be removing any existing facilities without detailed design drawings from SVP indicating potential removals. Simply indicating that SVP facilities are to be removed or relocated on conceptual plans does not imply that this action has been approved by SVP.

SVP27. SVP does not utilize any sub-surface (below grade) devices in its system. This includes transformers, switches, etc.

SVP28. All interior meter rooms at ground level are to have direct, outside access through only ONE door.

Interior electric rooms must be enclosed in a dedicated electric room and cannot be in an open warehouse or office space.

SVP29. In the case of podium-style construction, all SVP facilities and conduit systems must be located on solid ground (aka “real dirt”), and cannot be supported on parking garage ceilings or placed on top of structures.

SVP30. Applicant is advised to contact SVP (CSC Electric Department) to obtain specific design and utility requirements that are required for building permit review/approval submittal. Please provide a site plan to Leonard Buttitta at 408-615-6620 to facilitate plan review.

WATER & SEWER
W1. Recycled Water Ready: All onsite plumbing for non-domestic water uses (e.g. irrigation) shall be designed for recycled water use and shall comply with all Recycled Water regulations.

W2. Recycled Water Design: Each Recycled Water land use (irrigation, dual-plumbing, cooling system, industrial processes, etc.) shall have a separate metered service connection to the main. Applicant shall verify separations between all potable/fire lines and recycled water lines, pipe type, pipe depths, equipment types, warning lids, tags and signs.

W3. Potable Water Main: Pursuant to the findings of the Development Impact Analysis (DIA), the applicant shall upgrade the existing 8" and 10” Cast Iron water main along Calabazas and El Camino Real with a new 12" DIP pipe water main. The water main upgrade shall extend to the limits determined by the DIA, or, at a minimum, the entire length of the property's frontage.

W4. Encroachment Permit: Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit an encroachment permit application and design plans for construction of water utilities that comply with the ________________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of Rezone Approval Page 12 of 13
PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
latest edition of the Water & Sewer Utilities Water Service and Use Rules and Regulations, Water System Notes, and Water Standard Details and Specifications. In addition, prior to the City's issuance of Occupancy, the applicant shall construct all public water utilities per the approved plans. The Water & Sewer Utilities will inspect all public water utility installations and all other improvements encroaching public water utilities.

Note that all new water meters and backflow prevention devices shall be located behind the sidewalk in a landscape area. Fire hydrants should be located two feet behind monolithic sidewalk if sidewalk is present; two feet behind face of curb if no sidewalk is present, per City Std Detail 18. The plans shall provide the profile section details for utilities crossing water, sewer, or recycled water mains to ensure a 12” minimum vertical clearance is maintained.

W6. Utility Separations: Applicant shall adhere to and provide a note indicating that all horizontal and vertical clearances comply with State and local regulations. The applicant shall maintain a minimum 12” of vertical clearance at water service crossing with other utilities, and all required minimum horizontal clearances from water services: 10' from sanitary sewer utilities, 10’ from recycled water utilities, 8' from storm drain utilities, 5' from fire and other water utilities, 3' from abandoned water services, 5' from gas and electric utilities, and 5’ from the edge of the propose or existing driveway. For sanitary sewer, water, and recycled water utilities, the applicant shall maintain a minimum horizontal clearance of 10' from existing and proposed trees. If applicant installs tree root barriers, clearance from tree reduces to 5' (clearance must be from the edge of tree root barrier to edge of water facilities). No structures (fencing, foundation, biofiltration swales, etc.) allowed over sanitary sewer, potable water and/or recycled water utilities and easements.

W7. Separate Services: Applicant shall submit plans showing proposed water, recycled water, sanitary sewer, and fire services connected to a public main in the public right-of-way to the satisfaction of the Director of Water & Sewer Utilities. Different types of water and recycled water use (domestic, irrigation, fire) shall be served by separate water services, each separately tapped at the water main. Tapping on existing fire service line(s) is prohibited. Approved backflow prevention device(s) are required on all potable water services.

W8. City Standard Meters and Backflows: All proposed meters and backflows for all water services shall meet the current City of Santa Clara Water & Sewer Utilities Standard Details. Plans shall show meter and backflow configurations to scale.

W9. Existing Services: The applicant must indicate the disposition of all existing water and sewer services and mains on the plans. If the existing services will not be used, then the applicant shall properly abandon these services to the main per Water & Sewer Utilities standards and install a new service to accommodate the water needs of the project. The applicant shall bear the cost of any relocation or abandonment of existing Water Department facilities required for project construction to the satisfaction of the Director of Water and Sewer Utilities.

W10. On-Site Storm Drain Treatment: Prior to issuance of Building Permit, the applicant shall submit plans showing any onsite storm water treatment system. The plan shall include a section detail of the treatment system. No water, sewer, or recycled water facilities shall be located within 5-feet of any storm water treatment system.

W11. Water Usage: Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall provide documentation of water usage so the Water Division can verify the appropriate size of all proposed water meters. Please note that if the existing water services are incapable of supplying the water needs to the site, the existing services shall be abandoned, and new separate dedicated water services shall be provided for each use (domestic and irrigation).

W12. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit plan details for all water features (including but not limited to fountains and ponds) designed to include provisions for operating the system without City potable water supply and capable of being physically disconnected from source of potable water supply during City declared water conservation periods, to the satisfaction of the Director ________________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of Rezone Approval Page 13 of 13
PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
of the Water & Sewer Utilities. Decorative water features may be permanently connected to the City’s recycled water supply.

W13. Easements: Prior to City’s issuance of Building or Grading Permits, the applicant shall provide a dedicated water utility easement around the backflow prevention device onsite. The water utility easement for the water services and all other public water appurtenances shall be a minimum 15 feet wide and be adjacent to the public right-of-way without overlapping any public utility easement.

Additionally, the applicant shall submit plans defining existing easements so Water Division can verify if there are any conflicts with proposed easements and water utilities.

A dedicated fire service line, with an approved backflow prevention device, shall be used for on-site fire hydrants. Fire service lines required for commercial and industrial use shall be sized appropriately per fire flow demand and code requirements.

W15. Record Drawings: Upon completion of construction and prior to the City’s issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall provide "as-built" drawings of the public water utility infrastructure prepared by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the Director of Water & Sewer Utilities Department.

W16. Water Shortage Response Actions: Pursuant to the City of Santa Clara’s Urban Water Management Plan, during times of drought or water shortage, the City implements water shortage response actions in accordance with the level of water shortage declared. All construction activities and all new irrigation connections are subject to the Water Shortage Response Actions in effect at the time of construction and connection of the irrigation service.

Conditions of Tentative Tract Map Approval Page 1 of 6
PLNB2020-14705 / PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080

CONDITIONS OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP APPROVAL
In addition to complying with all applicable codes, regulations, ordinances and resolutions, the following conditions of approval are recommended:

GENERAL
A. If relocation of an existing public facility becomes necessary due to a conflict with the developer's new improvements, then the cost of said relocation shall be borne by the developer.

B. Comply with all applicable codes, regulations, ordinances and resolutions.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

BUILDING DIVISION
BD1. Informational: Prior to overall construction permit application, submit to the Santa Clara Building Division, 2 copies of an addressing diagram request, to be prepared by a licensed architect or engineer. The addressing diagram(s) shall include all proposed streets and all building floor plans. The addressing diagram(s) shall conform to Santa Clara City Manager Directive #5; Street Name and Building Number Changes, and Santa Clara Building Division Address Policy For Residential and Commercial Developments. The addressing diagram(s) shall indicate all unit numbers to be based off established streets, not alleys nor access-ways to garages. Allow a minimum of 10 working days for initial staff review. Please note city staff policy that existing site addresses typically are retired. Provide digital pdf printed from design software, not scanned from printed paper sheet.

BD3. Informational: The construction permit application drawings submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Low Impact Development (LID) practices http://www.scvurpppw2k.com/nd_wp.shtml. All projects that disturb more than one acre, or projects that are part of a larger development that in total disturbs more than one acre, shall comply with the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Best Management Practices (BMP): http://www.scvurppp-w2k.com/construction_bmp.shtml, and shall provide a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by a certified Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). All site drainage and grading permit applications submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include a city of Santa Clara "C3" data form, available on this web page:https://www.santaclaraca.gov/our-city/departments-gz/public-works/environmental-programs/stormwater-pollution-prevention and will be routed to a contract consultant for review.

Conditions of Tentative Tract Map Approval Page 2 of 6
PLNB2020-14705 / PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
BD4. Informational: no California construction code review is being done at this time. The construction permit application drawings submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include an overall California Building Code analysis, including; proposed use and occupancy of all spaces (19' CBC Ch. 3), all building heights and areas (19' CBC Ch. 5), all proposed types of construction (19' CBC Ch. 6), all proposed fire and smoke protection features, including all types of all fire rated penetrations proposed (19' CBC Ch. 7), all proposed interior finishes fire resistance (19' CBC Ch. 8), all fire protection systems proposed (19' CBC Ch. 9), and all means of egress proposed (19' CBC Ch. 10). -Noncombustible exterior wall, floor, and roof finishes are strongly encouraged.  During construction retaining a single company to install all fire rated penetrations is highly recommended.
 The grade level lobbies shall be min.1 hour rated all sides and above.  All stair shafts shall be min. 1 hour rated.
 All elevator shafts shall be min. 1 hour rated.
 All trash chute shafts shall be min. 1 hour rated.
 Recommendation: provide a minimum of two trash chutes; one for recyclables, one for trash, each trash chute to be routed down to a grade level trash collection room.
 Any trash rooms shall be min. 1 hour rated all sides and above.

BD5. Informational: The overall project construction permit application shall include the geotechnical, architectural, structural, energy, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing drawings and calculations. Prior to the issuance of the overall project construction permit, a conditions of approval review meeting must be held in city hall, which meeting must be attended by the on-site field superintendent(s). The meeting will not be held without the attendance of the on-site field superintendent(s). The on-site grading permit shall be a separate permit application to the Building Division.

BD6. Informational: Temporary Certificates of Occupancy will not be routinely issued, and will be considered on a very limited basis only when there is a clear and compelling reason for city staff to consider a TCO. A TCO will be approved only after all applicable City staff have approved in writing; Planning, P.W./ Engineering, Fire Prev., Santa Clara Water, Silicon Valley Power, and any other applicable agencies such as the Santa Clara County Health Dept., with the Building Division being the final approval of all TCO.'s.

PLANNING DIVISION
P1. The project shall comply with Conditions of Approval for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project (PLN2020-14674) and Mitigated Negative Declaration/Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (CEQ2020-01080).

P2. Developer shall submit to the City Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) or equivalent instrument assigning and governing perpetual maintenance of the private street in good condition for the life of the Project, prior to issuance of building permits.

Said document shall be recorded along with the Title for each property with the Santa Clara County Recorder’s Office.

PARKS & RECREATION
PR1. This memo assumes the Project is a subdivision and the Quimby Act provisions will apply. The project will generate an estimated 144 residents (2.4 persons/household x 60 units). Based on the Quimby Act standard of 3.0 acres/1000 residents | MFA standard of 2.6 acres/1,000 residents, the amount of public parkland required for this Project to mitigate the impact of the new resident demand is approximately 0.432-acres. The equivalent fee due in lieu of parkland dedication is therefore $2,668,080. Final Conditions of Tentative Tract Map Approval Page 3 of 6
PLNB2020-14705 / PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
calculations will depend upon the actual number and type of units and the mix of parkland dedicated and remaining fee due, at the discretion of the City.

PR3. Dwelling Unit Tax. A dwelling unit tax (DUT) is also due based on the number of units and additional bedrooms per City Code Chapter 3.15. The Project mix includes 28 twobedroom units and 32 three-bedroom units for a total DUT of $1,360.

PUBLIC WORKS

Contact Public Works Department at (408) 615-3000 for further information.

Issuance of the Encroachment Permit and payment of all appropriate fees shall be completed prior to commencement of work, and all work under the permit shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permit.

E4. All work within the State right-of-way shall require a Caltrans encroachment permit.

E5. All work within the Santa Clara Valley Water District right-of-way shall require a Santa Clara Valley Water District encroachment permit.

E6. Existing non-standard or non-ADA compliant frontage improvements shall be replaced with current City standard frontage improvements as directed by the City Engineer or his designee.

E8. Dedicate, as required, on-site easements for new and existing utilities and new sidewalks by Subdivision Map or approved instrument at time of development.

Developer shall pay applicable easement preparation/processing fee.

E9. Dedicate a sidewalk easement for the sidewalk and driveway portions within private property and pay the easement preparation fee. Sidewalk easement shall be 1’ behind proposed back-of-walk if there is landscaping behind sidewalk and/or at the proposed back-of-walk with a cold joint if there is hardscape concrete behind sidewalk.

E10. Obtain Council approval of a resolution ordering vacation of existing public easement(s) proposed to be abandoned, if any, through Public Works Department, and pay all appropriate fees, prior to start of construction
Conditions of Tentative Tract Map Approval Page 4 of 6
PLNB2020-14705 / PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
E11. After City Council approval of the Tentative Map, submit 10 copies of the Subdivision Map, prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor or a Registered Civil Engineer with Land Surveyor privileges to the Engineering Department. The submittal shall include a title report, closure calculations, and all appropriate fees.

W4. Encroachment Permit: Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit an encroachment permit application and design plans for construction of water utilities that comply with the latest edition of the Water & Sewer Utilities Water Service and Use Rules and Regulations, Water System Notes, and Water Standard Details and Specifications. In addition, prior to the City's issuance of Occupancy, the applicant shall construct all public water utilities per the approved plans. The Water & Sewer Utilities will inspect all public water utility installations and all other improvements encroaching public water utilities.

W5. Utility Design Plans: Utility Design Plans shall indicate the pipe material and the size of existing water, recycled water and sewer main(s). The plans shall show the nearest existing fire hydrant and the two nearest existing water main line gate valves near the project area. The plans shall show meter and backflow configurations to scale and per City of Santa Clara Water & Sewer Utilities Standard Details. Note that all new water meters and backflow prevention devices shall be located behind the sidewalk in a landscape area. Fire hydrants should be located two feet behind monolithic sidewalk if sidewalk is present; two feet behind face of curb if no sidewalk is present, per City Std Detail 18. The plans shall provide the profile section details for utilities crossing water, sewer, or recycled water mains to ensure a 12” minimum vertical clearance is maintained.

W6. Utility Separations: Applicant shall adhere to and provide a note indicating that all horizontal and vertical clearances comply with State and local regulations. The applicant shall maintain a minimum 12” of vertical clearance at water service crossing with other utilities, and all required minimum horizontal clearances from water services: 10' from sanitary sewer utilities, 10’ from recycled water utilities, 8' from storm drain utilities, 5' from fire and other water utilities, 3' from abandoned water services, 5' from gas and electric utilities, and 5’ from the edge of the propose or existing driveway. For sanitary sewer, water, and recycled water utilities, the applicant shall maintain a minimum horizontal clearance of 10' from existing and proposed trees. If applicant installs tree root barriers, clearance from tree reduces to 5' (clearance must be from the edge of tree root barrier to edge of water facilities). No structures (fencing, foundation, biofiltration swales, Conditions of Tentative Tract Map Approval Page 5 of 6
PLNB2020-14705 / PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
etc.) allowed over sanitary sewer, potable water and/or recycled water utilities and easements.

W7. Separate Services: Applicant shall submit plans showing proposed water, recycled water, sanitary sewer, and fire services connected to a public main in the public right-ofway to the satisfaction of the Director of Water & Sewer Utilities. Different types of water and recycled water use (domestic, irrigation, fire) shall be served by separate water services, each separately tapped at the water main. Tapping on existing fire service line(s) is prohibited. Approved backflow prevention device(s) are required on all potable water services.

Decorative water features may be permanently connected to the City’s recycled water supply.

W13. Easements: Prior to City’s issuance of Building or Grading Permits, the applicant shall provide a dedicated water utility easement around the backflow prevention device onsite.

The water utility easement for the water services and all other public water appurtenances shall be a minimum 15 feet wide and be adjacent to the public right-ofway without overlapping any public utility easement. Additionally, the applicant shall submit plans defining existing easements so Water Division can verify if there are any conflicts with proposed easements and water utilities.

W14. Underground Fire Permit: Prior to issuance of Building Permits, applicant shall submit an underground fire permit unless otherwise waived by the Fire Department. If fire flow information is needed, applicant shall coordinate with Water and Sewer Utilities Department, for fire flow information at (408)615-2000. A dedicated fire service line, with an approved backflow prevention device, shall be used for on-site fire hydrants. Fire service lines required for commercial and industrial use shall be sized appropriately per fire flow demand and code requirements.

Conditions of Tentative Tract Map Approval Page 6 of 6
PLNB2020-14705 / PLN2020-14674 / CEQ2020-01080
W15. Record Drawings: Upon completion of construction and prior to the City’s issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall provide "as-built" drawings of the public water utility infrastructure prepared by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the Director of Water & Sewer Utilities Department.

From:

Toi
Subject:

Date:

Hi Debby,
Comment for June 15th planning commission meeting
Friday, June 10, 2022 1:29:05 PM
Post '.\[eetint: '.\bteri~I
Pfanning Commii$ioa ;\·letting
6-15-2022
llt lll 2
I'm writing in suppo1t of Tom Quaglia's proposal for the 2 and 3 sto1y townhome project at 3141-3155 El Camino Real (project number
(PLN2020-14674). Tom's 2 aud 3 sto1y proposal is more sensible for this site than the 4 and 5 sto1y proposals outlined in the Specific Plan, as this site sits directly adjacent to a neighborhood of single family homes. A tall development at this site, as well as the other sites on the North side of El Camino Real will subject adjacent homes to heavy shading and shadows in winter mouths (when sunshine is needed most), and reduced privacy for residents.

Shorter developments are more appropriate for these sites.

Thank.you,
Joseph Penniman
1689 Hood Ct, Santa Clara, CA 95051
From:

To: l!l!c1ez
Post Mectmg Mnt"1"iAl PIAnning
Corumin ,011 M,e1iog
6-15-2022
h=2
Subject: Re: PLN2020-14674 3141-3155 El Camino Real
Date: Monday, June 13, 2022 4:43:35 PM
Hi Debby,
I might not be able to attend the meeting. May I please request that this letter be read out loud dming the appropriate collllllent time period?
Regards,
Linda
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 9, 2022, at 3:48 PM, Debby Fernandez <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello Linda, thank you for your comments. They will be made part of the public record and provided to the Planning Commission and City Council.

Regards,
Debby
From: Linda Zazzara
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2022 2:27 PM
To: Debby Fernandez <[email protected]>
Subject: PLN2020-14674 3141-3155 El Camino Real
Debby Fernandez
Support letter for 3141-3155 El Camino Real PLN2020-
14674
Dear Ms. Fernandez,
Please share this letter with material presented at the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for June 15,
2022.

Although we need to add housing, we need to do it
respectfully. This project is adding housing, including below 15% market rate opportunities and I think it is even more exciting that this project has for sale housing. I believe we have been building more rental units than for sale housing. I think we do need additional for sale housing, to give people in the City of Santa Clara the option to either rent or purchase.

In addition, the developer that wants to build this project has had his plans in for quite a while. I believe that it conforms to the existing General Plan. He has engaged, listened to and has the support of the neighbors. This developer has waited long enough. Let him proceed.

It is a sane plan with height and density considerations that respects neighbors. I can only hope that future developers along the ECR and more importantly Planning
Commissioners and City Council members also show the
same respect for current and future residents.

Regards,
Linda Zazzara
Sent from my iPad
From:

To:

Subject:

Date:

Attachments:

Elizabeth Elliott
Klcao s1oab: Lucy Garcia
FW: Letter of Support for 3141·3155 El Camino Road
Friday, June 17, 2022 9:29:21 AM
3141-3155 El Camino Road · Letter of suooort odf
1maai:001 ona
image003 ong
From: PlanningCommission
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2022 9:28 AM
To: Debby Fernandez
<[email protected]>
Cc: Reena Brilliot <[email protected]>; Lesley Xavier <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Letter of Support for 3141-3155 El Camino Road Good Morning Reed,
Post Meeting Material
Planning Commission Meeting
6/15/22
Item 2
Your letter was received in the Planning Division and by way of this reply I am including the appropriate staff for their information. The item was approved with an unanimous vote at the meeting.

Please note, your correspondence will part of the public record on this Item.

Thank you.

Elizabeth Elliott
Community Development Department I Planning Division
1500 Warburton Avenue I Santa Clara, CA 95050
0: 408.615.2450 I D: 408.615.2474
WWW SantaCjaraCA ll◊Y
From: Reed Schwartz
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 6:11 PM
To: PlanningCommission <PIANNINGCOMM [email protected]> Subject: Letter of Support for 3141-3155 El Camino Road Hi,
Attached is a letter of support for the project at 3141-3155 El Camino Road.

Thanks!
Reed Schwartz
YIMBY Law Intern
Wesleyan University '24
YIMBYLaw
57 Post St, Suite 908
San Francisco, CA 94104
heHo@yimbylaw org
6/1/2022
Santa Clara Planning Commission
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
[email protected]
Via Email
Re: 3141-3155ElCaminoRoad
Dear Santa Clara Planning Commission,
G I
I

YIMBY LAW
YIMBY Law is a 501(c)3 non-profit corporation, whose mission is to increase the accessibility and affordability of housing in California. YIMBY Law sues municipalities when they fail to comply with state housing laws, including the Housing Accountability Act (HM). As you know, the Area Planning Commission has an obligation to abide by all relevant state housing laws when evaluating the above captioned proposal, including the HM. Should the City fail to follow the law, YIMBY Law will not hesitate to ensure that the law is enforced.

The applicant proposes to create 60 new units, 40 three-story townhomes and 20 flats, with nine units designated as affordable. The application and approval also include a proposed Zone Change for density from CT to PD.

California Government Code § 65589.51 the Housing Accountability Act, prohibits localities from denying housing development projects that are compliant with the locality's zoning ordinance or general plan at the time the application was deemed complete, unless the locality can make findings that the proposed housing development would be a threat to public health and safety.

The City has erroneously determined that the applicant must submit a request for a rezoning, even though the HAA strictly prohibits local governments from requiring a rezoning when, as here, the general plan and zoning are inconsistent. In this case, the zoning is inconsistent with the general plan; while zoned for commercial use, General Plan policies allow an entirely residential use for sites along El Camino Real.

In 2018 AB 3194 set out to close a loophole that local governments have exploited to avoid cornpliance with the HAA: maintaining low zoning densities to force projects into discretionary rezoning processes. AB 3194 fixed this problem in two ways. First, this bill specifically prohibits local governments from requiring rezoning in cases where the zoning is inconsistent with the general plan. Second, in cases where a local government argues that zoning is consistent with the general plan, the bill requires local governments to facilitate the density allowed under the 1 general plan rather than the zoning. The amendment added Section (j)(4), which states:

For purposes of this section, a proposed housing development project is not inconsistent with the applicable zoning standards and criteria, and shall not require a rezoning, if the housing development project is consistent with the objective general plan standards and criteria but the zoning for the project site is inconsistent with the general plan. If the local agency has complied with paragraph (2), the local agency may require the proposed housing development project to comply with the objective standards and criteria of the zoning which is consistent with the general plan, however, the standards and criteria shall be applied to facilitate and accommodate development at the density allowed on the site by the general plan and proposed by the proposed housing development project. (Emphasis added.) The above captioned proposal is general plan compliant, and must be approved at the density allowed on the site by the general plan and proposed by the housing development project (PD), therefore, your local agency must approve the application regardless of whether a zoning change is granted, or else make findings to the effect that the proposed project would have an adverse impact on public health and safety, as described above. Should the City fail to comply with the law, YIMBY Law will not hesitate to take legal action to ensure that the law is enforced.

I am signing this letter both in my capacity as the Executive Director of YIMBY Law, and as a resident of California who is affected by the shortage of housing in our state.

Sincerely,
Sonja Trauss
Executive Director
YIMBYLaw
YIMBY Law, 57 Post Street, Suite 908 1 San Francisco, CA 94104 2 Debby Fernandez
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Debby Fernandez
Linda Zazzara
Thursday, June 09, 2022 2:27 PM
Debby Fernandez
PLN2020-14674 3141-3155 El Camino Real
Support letter for 3141-3155 El Camino Real PLN2020-14674 Dear Ms. Fernandez,
Please share this letter with material presented at the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for June 15, 2022.

Usually I actively challenge proposals along the ECR because they are too tall, too dense and not respectful to neighborhoods. There are some residents in Santa Clara that do not want any more housing development in our city. In my opinion that is not practical when so many people need housing and the State is pushing all cities to increase housing opportunities. ,
Although we need to add housing, we need to do it respectfully. This project is adding housing, including below 15% market rate opportunities and I think it is even more exciting that this project has for sale housing. I believe we have been building more rental units than for sale housing. I think we do need additional for sale housing, to give people in the City of Santa Clara the option to either rent or purchase.

It is a sane plan with height and density considerations that respects neighbors. I can only hope that future developers along the ECR and more importantly Planning Commissioners and City Council members also show the same respect for current and future residents.

Regards,
Linda Zazzara
Sent from my iPad
1 Dear Ms. Fernandez,
My family lives at 2139 Stebbins Ave. Santa Clara, 95051. We heard about the proposed development at the comer of Calabazas Boulevard and El Camino Real. I'm writing this letter to support the proposed project.

As a neighbor and resident oftbe City of Santa Clara, we urge the Planning Commission and City Council to approve the project and bring much needed For-Sale housing to the city and om neighborhood.

The proposed 2 and 3 story For-Sale buildings are sensitive to the neighborhood, complies with the existing General Plan and·will provide a high quality architectural transition to the single family homes surrotmding this critical corner. Not everyone wants to live in 4, 5 aud potentially 6 story rental apartment buildings and this project provides a thoughtful alternative.

We support this project and hope it is approved as soon as possible.

Thank you,
Debby Fernandez
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dear Ms. Fernandez,
Annie Yuan
Thursday, June 09, 2022 12:06 PM
Debby Fernandez
Santa Clara Residents Opinion on Bowers Plaza Project
We're residents of the City of Santa Clara, personally we support the proposed development at t he corner of Calabazas Boulevard and El Camino Real. But we'd like to urge the Planning Commission and City Council to approve the project and bring much needed For-Sale housing to the city and our neighborhood.

The proposed 2 and 3 story For-Sale buildings are sensitive to the neighborhood, comply with the existing General Plan andwill provide a high quality architectural transition t o the single family homes surroundingthis critical corner. Not everyone wants to live in 4, 5 and potentially 6 story rental apartment buildings and this project provides a t houghtful alternative. Hope this would be heard and considered I
Thanks!
Lipin & Xinyu
1 Debby Fernandez
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dear Ms. Fernandez,
Tam, Steven K.

Thursday, June 09, 2022 10:12 AM
Debby Fernandez
Letter of Support PLN2020-1467 - 3141-3155 EL Camino Real Development Proposal I support the proposed development at t he corner of C:alabazas Boulevard and El Camino Real. I have lived in the City of Santa Clara for over 8 years and support the development of appropriate for-sale/ownership housing in t he City. The proposed 2 and 3 story buildings fi t the adjacent neighborhood and t he high qualit y architectural on a prominent corner will only enhance the area. This project strikes t he right balance between providing 60 units of m uch needed housing while respect ing the existing neighborhood, and we urge Planning Commission and City Council to approve t he project.

Sincerely,
Steven K. Tam
Counsel
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
[§I (@ in
IT.!! Lowecsteln l.:ii.l Sander
This message contains confidential information, intended only for the person(s) named above, which may also be privileged. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. In such case, you should delete this message and kindly notify the sender via reply e-mail. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind. 1 Debby Fernandez
From: Kent Hillhouse/USA
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2022 3:41 PM
To: Debby Fernandez
Subje ct: 3141-3155 EL.Camino Real Development Proposal Debby Fernandez
[email protected]
Subject: Letter of Support PLN2020-1467 - 3141-3155 EL Camino Real Development Proposal Dear Ms. Fernandez,
We support t he proposed development at t he corner of Calabazas Boulevard and El Camino Real. We have lived in the City of Santa Clara for over seven years and support the development of appropriat e for-sale/ownership housing iri the City. The proposed 2 and 3 story buildings fit the adjacent neighborhood and the high quality architectural on a prominent corner w ill only enhance the area. This project strikes t he right balance between providing 60 units of much needed housing while respecting the existing neighborhood, and we urge Planning Commission and Cit y Council to approve t he project.

Sincerely,
Kent Hillhouse
740 Hilmar Street
Santa Clara, CA 95050
The Information contained in this email (including any attachments) Is confidential, may be subject to legal or other professional privilege and contain copyright material,
and is Intended for use by the named recipient(s) only.

Access to or use of this email or its attachments by anyone else is strictly prohibited and_ may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you may not use, disclose,
copy or distribute this email or its attachments (or any part thereof), nor t ake or omit to take any action In reliance on it. If you have received this email in error, please notify
the sender immediately by telephone or email and delete it, and all copies thereof, including all attachments, from your system. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived
or lost because this email has been sent to you by mistake.

Although we have taken reasonable precautions to reduce the risk of transmitting software viruses, we accept no liability for any loss or damage caused by this email or its
attachments due to viruses, Interference, Interception, corruption or unapproved access.

Please see our website to view our privacy notice/ statement. 1 Debby Fernandez
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dear Ms. Fernandez,
Patrick Downey
Tuesday, May 31, 2022 12:32 PM
Debby Fernandez
Letter of Support PLN2020-14674 3141-3155 El Camino Real We support the proposed development at the comer of Calabazas Boulevard and El Camino Real. My family has lived in the City of Santa Clara for over 30 years and as such, we urge the Planning Commission and City Council to approve the project and bring much needed for-sale ownership housing to the City. The proposed 2 and 3 story buildings are sensitive to the neighborhood, comply with the existing General Plan and will provide a high quality architectural transition to the single family homes surrounding this critical comer. Not everyone wants to live in 4, 5 and potentially 6 story rental apartment buildings and this project provides a thoughtful alte1native.

I have many friends who live in these new developments of only 2-3 stories and they know tJ:ieir neighbors and are welcomed by the surrounding community. On the other hand, the friends I know who are in the larger buildings seldom know their neighbors. They often rent from the leasing company and have no pride for the community since they do not own their units. They have high turnover and rarely are able to connect with the people in their building because of the sheer volume. Please decide on the right path forward for the neighbors and support PLN2020-1467 4 3141-3155 El Camino Real .

We support this project and hope it is approved as soon as possible.

Thank you,
Patrick Downey
1 May 13, 2022
Debby Fernandez
Associate Planner
City of Santa Clara Planning Department
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Re: PLN2020-14674
Request for Approval of Project at 3155 El Camino Real
Dear Ms. Fernandez,
As a born and raised Santa Clara resident for over three decades, I am in strong support of the proposed development project at the above referenced address on El Camino Real and Calabazas Blvd. Having grown up around this neighborhood, frequenting the businesses and restaurants, I can say that the project would be a welcome improvement to this part of the El Camino corridor.

There is an urgent need for housing, but a balance is needed to avoid over densification. The buildings proposed meet that balance by maintaining a 2 to 3 story height and a pleasing architectural style. They also provide a great option for affordable for-sale units which would open up more opportunities for homeownership, which has become increasingly difficult in the City of Santa Clara and surrounding areas.

I strongly support this project and urge the Planning Commission to approve as soon as possible.

Thank you,
~
3/n c:vwk 4; :zc1
o2i
!
lt4:!t;f;~~~
I l5'o6 w~- ~f _
iY~ ~~ 9-5'r>5'o

f ivNJt,~ ~~ '
ed;:j/ rJ7 ~ o' ~ (}ja_)uc_,,-
/ ?°co <f D;:,J"e,1vt··u/~~
~/l"!Vtv' aell~ tu1 C' c2/ f .5(Jj c,
fl.1'7;./ I 4/..vt-10._ J ,,./J,'l/J7.c1 ~C,t1/
~ .. .' Lk-t,,e,t/411.1;;;1,t (g) c.Jlt/J p/o-;-- c!c (!d,4K,v;tJ--- Btnv~ PJ4~,,,
~J rJ,,r,,,,( '---1'>7 '-fa~,L ~ Of1f' ~~
iD, ;iJlld- rfaA-e_~ .,,;c {l,,_,l d ,,_ /p, cJ+k -1_, ~ ¢ ~ ,,c;l._ iA_H,,.··l7h,_.-, \../ 1 ;t;t,J-/) ~ 4,.,a_) 1 {J-?,{,/2_ .._,Y/2.&71~_,,, , ~ CZ{flt_ /4) _,vrvd~/c_ / U L£ -~ cR./2.e_ e,l.-U.~•d~/ ~> ·-n-; a:..7 .~,1r1~-z ,L u-11- 1,L 0U?v./ jJ/2 ~i/ Cf.-,;,i.,,t':c ~ d--z,0"L.-, , L-rlRA--Y'l/hJ~~- ·J/2 ruft--r:- -~-~ ~ r /l~t_;J/ ~ / tJ,f .u0}.L./, c/!~t- ~.e4:Af-'!,J'-J- ,/44- 1 ~n,-,,-,,~~7:a -1.--c~'· j;u,-,:/--i;Lc?eA-4...., ~ •~--l~,_~lc_ 1 c;1/2..,~<-;J- ~ /,1J'i£,a_2 .
1 - tY7l.fl_ J {!_. fv)_,, -j2e1- tvh(.,L_; /lJ-/L/!_,,;,t_ ~~ ?0£-?~ ~ ~1/'C. ;Ii<,1-i") .2? -;1/4 ~ C--tl1 \/J l~- '7/llY~ , //? t&-1~1- i:1( ~ _,hl?L,,t; (}A,,_, i(h_ ~ 'j t0r-.,fj_, 1 ,£,,_:z- 711Ct,if __J'f~ 2-wv J ,:t;,,uZd ,di?,,.:[]!,, T~, -n, ,,.,v , {];r_,W_,; \,,.-1,·rv1'L \'.. ~ aft-0 ~
a ,,jl. 1 -f'-✓ ,,M7:<C-' JU! ,,_,,_,, ,,_,, -;t.. L --r'-~f-4'.J-<_ ,il.._ tl_~~,11..f.-1~ '-A,,~-t,,., J;u,~,,,.,. ,2--- 7 n~ .--'- ?l, 1,t--;!l ,<1-t-o )c..._ 1 ~ ~~ : ~,.. ,::,,,t,r,,_re.,,_. c,,,..,J.. a·:r J!).J~ /Ji,.,<l-- . JJ:t:1 ~ ~ !:/,
Debby Fernandez
From:

Sent:

To:

Debby Fernandez
Tuesday, December 08, 2020 4:53 PM

DONALD BEST
Subject: RE: Proposed Development at 3141 - 3155 El Camino Real Hello Donald, thank you for your comments be low and for calling my attention to the incorrect email provided in the flyer. Your comments will be saved to the project file. I will alert the applicant of the error so that all future mailings provide the correct email address. This particular mailing was provided by the applicant.

Regards,
Debby
From: DONALD BEST
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2020 4:31 PM
To: Debby Fernandez <[email protected]>
Subject: Proposed Development at 3141 - 3155 El Camino Real Debby,
I am strongly opposed to this project. The city is letting these developers run haywire all for the all mighty dollar. El Camino is already congest ed enough without adding more problems to the area. When this was all started it was not supposed to take away retail space without having a place for it. We are having to drive farther and farther to shop. I understand progress I work in construction but this is getting rid iculous. Why not tear down the town hall and the fountain (that doesn't work most of the time) and put it there.

Don Best
Sent from my iPhone
1 Debby Fernandez
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Hi Mr Debby Fenandez,
Zhefan Wan
Thursday, October 07, 2021 1 :58 AM
Debby Fernandez
3077-3157 El Camino Real Resident Input
Hope you're doing well. I'm a 3-year resident of Tuscany Apartment s (3229 El Camino Real), across the street from the planned development at 3077-3157 El Camino Real. Not sure if you're the best person to reach out to, I wanted to share some concerns about how t his project affects the neighborhood's walkability, please let me know if there's someone better to reach out to.

It's my underst anding that the planned development will lead to the demolition of the existing Taj Mahal Imports grocery at 3109 El Camino Real. I wanted to inquire about whether any upcoming planned developments in the area include a replacement Asian grocery, and if not, express my concern at how Taj Maha l's demolition eliminates the walkability of the neighborhood.

I personally chose Tuscany apartments in part because of its closeness to nearby groceries, allowing me to buy cooking ingredients daily without use of a car or public transit. There are no other groceries within <15 minute walk of Tuscany apartments with fresh produce. Lucky and Han Kook are over 15 minutes walk to the west and require crossing the pedestrian-unfriendly Lawrence Expressway underpass, while Target is almost 30 minutes walk to the east. Target and Lucky, furthermore, are car-oriented and require passing uncomfortably large parking lots. It is extremely rare to have a small "neighborhood grocery" feeling in the south bay, and I can say very co nfidently that such an amenity has attracted me and other professionals to live in the neighborhood.

I'll also add, a large portion ofTuscany residents are of international origin and need an Indian grocery for their daily shopping needs, and the next closest Indian grocery is even further, 25 minutes, to the West.

I totally support increased high-density development along the El Ca mino corridor, but I hope this will not be at the expense of the groceries and restaurants that enable this neighborhood to be walkable. I am concerned that future housing development without walkable amenities will be counterproductive to both residents' and city's goals for the neighborhood.

Thank you for reading, I really care about this neighborhood and am eager for opportunities like this to contribut e to it s development.

Zhefan Wang
1 Letter To The Planning Commission
(From Bowers Plaza Tenants. Address: 3075--3157 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95051)
September 17, 2021
Dear Planning Commission of city of Santa Clara
Please accept my humble respects. I, Miten Patel, am writing this letter on behalf of all the "Bowers Plaza Tenants." I am the managei· and family member of Pani Puri Company located at above mentioned address.

First, we are writing to you as you are the first body of city committee that we were directed to by the project planner of the above address mentioned , We are requesting to delay the housing development project that is planned at the above mentioned address up to the year of 2023, along with some transitional support.

Transitional support is needed so the businesses that operate in Santa Clara are not lost. The livelihood of the employees that work at these establishment are not tarnished. The City of Santa Clara must adopt or develop a transitional agenda to help businesses, so there won't be any grudge towards the city and city members.

In such way work can flow flawlessly, in other words, all of the parties involved benefits! Or option two: If the council members votes to approve this project and if the tenants have to vacate the building, then at the least, ·we ask for is 12 months minimum of stay after the housing development project is approved. First reason for this is, there are five restaurants at this plaza, and it would take almost one year to build another facility for each ofus, as the planning and permitting process is lengthy and time consuming by the city of Santa Clara. And it would take even more resources, to redirect our current customer base to a new location. This request will give us time to relocate. Second, we cannot start the process of building another facility for ourselves because if the city does not approve the project then we would be either, stuck with two facility or may lose one of the investment unnecessarily. This is on top of the hardship that we are continually facing during these difficulties due to the pandemic, hyper inflation, and labor shortages. We all can understand and argue that this is a reasonable plea.

Secondly, we are the families and citizens of Santa Clara. Some ofus have been citizens of Santa Clara for over 30 years. And some of the businesses at bowers plaza have been in commission for over 25 years. Furthermore, we engage in other welfare activities such as: Books distribution, charity for autistic and disadvantage children's, to name a few. We cannot just give up everything because a developer wants to build a project and make money at the cost of others ruination or lively hood. Nor has the developers performed a single sacrifice for the city or the community. We need a justifiable process. What good is prosperity if the citizens are not happy? All of the parties should benefit! Moreover, the tenants of bowers plaza have been contributing to the city tax revenue through their hard work and money which benefits the city and the community. It is the tenants of this property that have been maintaining the property through their hard eamed money and also, engaging innumerable other businesses on maintaining this property. So, technically the tenants are the upholders of this property and partially this community, even though there is a separate owner. Toe tenants have invested large sum of capital through their hard earn services, so we should not lose that for the benefits of others.

Lastly, we ask that you take this matter very seriously, just like any other grave situation that you may have faced in your life time, but were denied of your sincere plea or request. All executives are great leaders and they have a great responsibility to uphold. The decision you make will not only affect the tenants but the whole community as well as your own humble self. Tiris is the time for you to justify what should be the correct decision.

Sincerely Yours

EL CAMINO REAL
CALABAZAS BLVD.

SITE
1/2 MI RADIUS
1/2 MI RADIUS

CALTRAIN
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
ARCHITECTURALA0.0 Cover/ Sheet IndexA0.1 Project DataA0.2 GreenPoint ChecklistA1.0 Architectural Site PlanA2.0 Perspective: Buildings 1 + 2 : Type AA2.1 Perspective: Buildings 1 + 2 : Type AA2.2 Elevations: Buildings 1 + 2 : Type AA2.3 Elevations: Buildings 1 + 2 : Type AA2.4 Perspective: Buildings 3 + 4 : Type BA2.5 Perspective: Buildings 3 + 4 : Type BA2.6 Elevations: Buildings 3 + 4 : Type BA2.7 Elevations: Buildings 3 + 4 : Type BA2.8 Elevations: Buildings 5-8 : Type CA2.9 Elevations: Buildings 5-8 : Type CA3.0 Conceptual Site SectionA4.0 Building Plans: Buildings 1 + 2 : Type AA4.1 Building Plans: Buildings 1 + 2 : Type AA4.2 Floor Plans: Buildings 1 + 2 : Type AA4.3 Floor Plans: Buildings 1 + 2 : Type AA4.4 Floor Plans: Buildings 1 + 2 : Type AA4.5 Floor Plans: Buildings 1 + 2 : Type AA4.6 Floor Plans: Buildings 1 + 2 : Type AA4.7 Floor Plans: Buildings 1 + 2 : Type AA4.8 Floor Plans: Buildings 1 + 2 : Type AA5.0 Townhome Building Plans:

Buildings 3 + 4 : Type B
A5.1 Townhome Building Plans:

Buildings 3 + 4 : Type B
A5.2 Townhome Building Plans:

Buildings 5-8 : Type C
A5.3 Townhome Building Plans:

Buildings 5-8 : Type C
A5.4 Townhome Floor Plans:

Buildings 3-8 : Type B+C
A5.5 Townhome Floor Plans:

Buildings 3-8 : Type B+C
A5.6 Townhome Floor Plans
Buildings 3-8 : Type B+C
A5.7 Townhome Floor Plans:

Buildings 5-8 : Type B+C
A5.8 Townhome Floor Plans:

Buildings 5-8 : Type B+C
A6.0 Colors and Materials Board:

Buildings 1+2: Type A
A6.1 Colors and Materials Board:

Buildings 2+3: Type B
A0.0 Cover Sheet / Index Sheet
3155 EL CAMINO REAL, SANTA CLARA, CA
AERIAL CONTEXT N.T.S.

CLIENT / BAYVIEW
DEVELOPMENT GROUP :
60 S. Market Street Ste. 450
San Jose, CA 95113
Edward McMahon
650.397.6289
[email protected]
ARCHITECT / KTGYARCHITECTURE + PLANNING :
1814 Franklin St., Suite 400
Oakland, CA, 94612
Jessica Musick
949.468.6392
[email protected]

LANDSCAPE / THE GUZZARDO
PARTNERSHIP INC. :
181 Greenwich Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Colin Bly
415.306.4771
[email protected]
CIVIL / JMH WEISS, INC. :
1731 Technology Drive, #880
San Jose, CA 95110
Carl Gutekunst
408.217.6422
[email protected]
JOINT TRENCH / VIZION:
7901 Stoneridge Dr., Suite 200
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Karlo Mendoza
925.682.1114
[email protected]
TRASH / AMERICANTRASH MANAGEMENT:
1900 Powell Street Suite 890,
Emeryville, CA 94608
Scott Brown
408.292.5401
[email protected]
LANDSCAPEL1.0 Schematic Landscape PlanL2.0 Schematic Landscape ImageryL3.0 Schematic Planting PlanL4.0 Ladder Pad ExhibitL5.0 Tree Disposition PlanL5.1 Tree Disposition Plan CIVILC1.0 Title SheetC2.0 Existing Conditions
& Preliminary Removal Plan
C3.0 Grading & Drainage PlanC4.0 Stormwater Control PlanC4.1 Stormwater Control Notes & DetailsC4.2 Media Filter NotesC5.0 Utility PlanC5.1 Composite Tree PlanC6.0 Sections & DetailsC7.0 Fire Layout Plan Tentative Tract Map 1 of 4Tentative Tract Map 2 of 4Tentative Tract Map 3 of 4Tentative Tract Map 4 of 4

JOINT TRENCH
JT-1 Joint Trench Title SheetJT-2 Joint Trench Intent
Developer Working Drawing (DWD)
-Silicon Valley Power (SVP) Plan for Electric
TRASH
TO-1 Site PlanTO-2 Trash Enclosure LayoutTO-3 Option 2: Service Location Loose Front-Load Service
SITE

EL CAMINO REAL
CALABAZAS BLVD.

Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598 A0.1 Project Summary NTS
Site Context Map
Project Description/Use/Occupancy ClassificationBuildings 1+2 Buildings 1+2 are 3 story, multifamily flats on level 1 and townhome units on level 2+3. The buildings are classified as R-2 occupancy. Each building has a main lobby entry with tuck-under garage for automobiles. Ground floor units are accessible. NFPA 13 Fire sprinkler system Buildings 3-8
Buildings 3-8 are 2-3 story townhomes with attached garages. They are classified as R-3 townhouse condominiums. These buildings face Calabazas or internal paseos and have entries with trellis', patio's, and/or stoops to activate the street frontages. Buildings 5-8 step down at the Southern edge to respect the adjacent neighbors.

Ten percent of the units in each building are accessible. NFPA 13D Fire sprinkler system (per CRC R313.1.1 and CFC 903.3.1.3) Construction Type:

All buildings are 2-3 stories, type VB Construction.

SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #1
OCTOBER 19, 2020
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598 A0.2 SUBMITTAL #3 Green Point Checklist DECEMBER 22, 2021 SUBMITTAL #4 FEBRUARY 11, 2022

A2.0 Perspective Buildings 1 + 2 : Type A
1 . Type A - Perspective
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
A2.1 Perspective Buildings 1 + 2 : Type A
2 . Type A - Perspective
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
±36'-9"
±6'-0" 10'-3" 10'-3" 10'-3" T.O. Ply
T.O. Parapet
3rd Level
2nd Level
Ground
Level
Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit
Accessible Unit
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
5FT Setback
Lane B
Lane C
Lane D
Lane A
ENTRY
OPEN
SPACE
2000 SF
ENTRY
CALABAZAS BLVD.

EL CAMINO REAL
BLDG
7 Type
C
BLDG
8 Type
C
BLDG
6 Type
C
BLDG
5 Type
C
BLDG
4 Type
B
BLDG
3 Type
B
BLDG 1
Type A
BLDG 2
Type A
±36'-9"
±6'-0" 10'-3" 10'-3" 10'-3" T.O. Ply
T.O. Parapet
3rd Level
2nd Level
Ground
Level
A2.2 Elevations Buildings 1 + 2 : Type A

1. Type A - Front Elevation
0 4 8 16
Key Map n.t.s.
1 2. Type A - Right Elevation
2 Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
Building Type A: Material Legend

1. Stucco

2. Composite Lap Siding

3. Metal Railing

4. Vinyl Window

5. Stone Veneer Patio

6. Metal Awning

7. Trellis
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
±36'-9"
±6'-0" 10'-3" 10'-3" 10'-3" T.O. Ply
T.O. Parapet
3rd Level
2nd Level
Ground
Level
Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit
Accessible Unit
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
5FT Setback
Lane B
Lane C
Lane D
Lane A
ENTRY
OPEN
SPACE
2000 SF
ENTRY
CALABAZAS BLVD.

EL CAMINO REAL
BLDG
7 Type
C
BLDG
8 Type
C
BLDG
6 Type
C
BLDG
5 Type
C
BLDG
4 Type
B
BLDG
3 Type
B
BLDG 1
Type A
BLDG 2
Type A
±34'-3"
±3'-6" 10'-3" 10'-3" 10'-3" T.O. Ply T.O. Parapet 3rd Level 2nd Level Ground
Level
A2.3 Elevation Buildings 1 + 2 : Type A

1. Type A - Back Elevation
0 4 8 16
Key Map n.t.s.

2. Type A- Left Elevation
1 2
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
Building Type A: Material Legend

1. Stucco

2. Composite Lap Siding

3. Metal Railing

4. Vinyl Window

5. Stone Veneer Patio

6. Metal Awning

7. Trellis
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
A2.4 Perspective 0 4 8 16 Buildings 3 + 4 : Type B
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
1 . Type B - Perspective
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
A2.5 Perspective 0 4 8 16 Buildings 3 + 4 : Type B
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
2 . Type B - Perspective
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
±6'-6"
±43'-3"
6'-0" 10'-3" 10'-3" 10'-3"
T.O. Stair
3rd Level
2nd Level
T.O. Ply
T.O. Parapet
Ground Level
Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit
Accessible Unit
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
5FT Setback
Lane B
Lane C
Lane D
Lane A
ENTRY
OPEN
SPACE
2000 SF
ENTRY
CALABAZAS BLVD.

EL CAMINO REAL
BLDG
7 Type
C
BLDG
8 Type
C
BLDG
6 Type
C
BLDG
5 Type
C
BLDG
4 Type
B
BLDG
3 Type
B
BLDG 1
Type A
BLDG 2
Type A
±36'-9"
±6'-0" 10'-3" 10'-3" 10'-3" 3rd Level 2nd Level T.O. Ply T.O. Parapet
Ground Level
A2.6 Elevations Buildings 3 + 4 : Type B
Key Map n.t.s.
0 4 8 16
1 2
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
Building Type B/C: Material Legend

1. Stucco

2. Roof

3. Metal Trellis

4. Metal Railing with Cap

5. Trim

6. Composite Lap Siding

7. Vinyl Window

8. Canopy

1. Type B - Elevation

2. Type B - Elevation
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
±36'-9"
±6'-0" 10'-3" 10'-3" 10'-3" 3rd Level 2nd Level T.O. Ply T.O. Parapet
Ground Level
Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit
Accessible Unit
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
5FT Setback
Lane B
Lane C
Lane D
Lane A
ENTRY
OPEN
SPACE
2000 SF
ENTRY
CALABAZAS BLVD.

1. Type B - Elevation
Key Map n.t.s.

2. Type B - Elevation
0 4 8 16
1 2
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
Building Type B/C: Material Legend

1. Stucco

2. Roof

3. Metal Trellis

4. Metal Railing with Cap

5. Trim

6. Composite Lap Siding

7. Vinyl Window

8. Canopy
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit
Accessible Unit
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
5FT Setback
Lane B
Lane C
Lane D
Lane A
ENTRY
OPEN
SPACE
2000 SF
ENTRY
CALABAZAS BLVD.

EL CAMINO REAL
BLDG
7 Type
C
BLDG
8 Type
C
BLDG
6 Type
C
BLDG
5 Type
C
BLDG
4 Type
B
BLDG
3 Type
B
BLDG 1
Type A
BLDG 2
Type A
±6'-6"
±43'-3"
6'-0" 10'-3" 10'-3" 10'-3"
T.O. Stair
3rd Level
2nd Level
T.O. Ply
T.O. Parapet
Ground Level
±36'-9"
±6'-0" 10'-3" 10'-3" 10'-3" 3rd Level 2nd Level T.O. Ply T.O. Parapet
Ground Level
A2.8 Elevations Buildings 5 - 8 : Type C
Key Map n.t.s.
0 4 8 16
2 Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598

1. Type C - Elevation

2. Type C - Elevation
1 Building Type B/C: Material Legend

1. Stucco

2. Roof

3. Metal Trellis

4. Metal Railing with Cap

5. Trim

6. Composite Lap Siding

7. Vinyl Window

EL CAMINO REAL
BLDG
7 Type
C
BLDG
8 Type
C
BLDG
6 Type
C
BLDG
5 Type
C
BLDG
4 Type
B
BLDG
3 Type
B
BLDG 1
Type A
BLDG 2
Type A
±36'-9"
±6'-0" 10'-3" 10'-3" 10'-3" 3rd Level 2nd Level T.O. Ply T.O. Parapet
Ground Level
25'-6"
10'-3" 10'-3" 5'-0" 2nd Level T.O. Ply
T.O. Parapet
Ground Level
A2.9 Elevations Buildings 5 - 8 : Type C
Key Map n.t.s.
0 4 8 16
1 2
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598

1. Type C - Elevation

2. Type C- Elevation
Building Type B/C: Material Legend

1. Stucco

2. Roof

3. Metal Trellis

4. Metal Railing with Cap

5. Trim

6. Composite Lap Siding

7. Vinyl Window

8. Canopy
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
Leel
Leel 2
Leel 1
T.O.Roo
± 30'-9"
± 43'-3"
10-"
T.O. Stair
Paraet
Height Limit Adacent to Residential
Per El Camino Real Seciic
PlanDrat Transition Policy 5.5.2

EL CAMINO
REAL
EISTING SFD LANE A
45°

PROPERTY LINE
FLAT

TH TH TH TH TH TH TH

ROOFDECK
TH TH

REAR PROPERTY LINE R
10-"10-"
Leel 1
T.O.Roo
± 30'-9"

± 36'-9"
T.O.Paraet
10-"10-"10-"
Leel 2
Leel
6-0" ± 6'-6"
± 6'-0"
Access Accessile Unit Accessile Unit Accessile Unit ile Unit Accessile Unit Accessile Unit Accessile Unit Accessile Unit Accessile Unit
Accessile Unit
EA
EA
EA
EA
5FT Setack
LaneD
Lane C
Lane B
Lane A
ENTRY
OPEN
SPACE
2000 SF
ENTRY
CALABAAS BLD.

CALABAAS CREEK

EL CAMINO REAL
BLDG
7 Tye
C
BLDG
8 Tye
C
BLDG
6 Tye
C
BLDG
5 Tye
C
BLDG
4 Tye
B
BLDG

Tye
B
BLDG 1
Tye A
BLDG 2
Tye A
A.0 Concetal Site Section 0 5 10 20
Key Ma n.t.s.

U
C
5 D
t
EL
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
138'-7"
58'-11"
UP
UP
UP UP
± 125 s.f.
± 19'-10" x 6'-6"
Deck
OPEN
TO
BELOW
DN
DN
UP
AC AC
UP
58'-11"
138'-7"
Single Car
Garage
15'-0" x 19'-2"
Two Car
Garage
18''-6" x 19'-2"
Two Car
Garage
10''-2" x 38'-3"
Two Car
Garage
10''-2" x 38'-3"
Two Car
Garage
10''-2" x 38'-3"
Two Car
Garage
10''-2" x 38'-3"
Two Car
Garage
10''-2" x 38'-3"
Two Car
Garage
10''-2" x 38'-3"
Two Car
Garage
18''-8" x 19'-2"
Two Car
Garage
19''-4" x 19'-5"
Accessible
Unit
Accessible
Unit
P5R Unit P4 Unit P6 Unit P6 Unit P4 Unit P5L Unit P3 Unit P3 Unit P1 Unit P2 Unit A4.0 Building Plans 0 4 8 16 Buildings 1 +2 : Type A Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #4
REVISED MAY 17, 2022
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
P1 P2 First Floor
P3 P6 P6 P3 Second Floor
P5R P4 P4 P5L
134'-1"
58'-7"
DN
DN
DN
134'-1"
56'-7"
A4.1 Building Plans 0 4 8 16 Buildings 1 +2 : Type A Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
Third Floor
P5R P4 P4 P5L
Roof
P3 P6 P6 P3
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
58'-2"
61'-2"
Primary Bedrm
12'-0" x 13'-0"
FAU
W.I.C Porch
10'-9" x 11'-4"
Great Room
15'-8" x 13'-11"
Bath 2
COAT
Primary
Bath
Laundry
Bedroom 2
10'-0" x 11'-4"
Flush
Threshold
3' door
Flush
Threshold
3' door
3' DOOR
121 s.f.
3' DOOR
3' DOOR
3' DOOR
3' DOOR
Single Car
Garage
15'-0" x 19'-2"
A4.2 Floor Plans 0 4 8 16 Buildings 1 +2 : Type A Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
P1- Accessible Unit
2 Bedroom2 Baths
±1345 n.s.f.

SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
61'-2"
58'-2"

FAU STORAGE
Bedroom 2
10'-0" x 10'-3"
Bath 2
15'-8" x 13'-11"
Primary Bedroom
12'-0" x 14'-0"
W.I.C
Porch
10'-9" x 10'-0"
P
Laundry
COAT
Primary
Bath
Great Room
108 s.f.

Kitchen
Flush
Threshold
3' door
Flush
Threshold
3' door
3' DOOR
3' DOOR
3' DOOR
3' DOOR
Two Car
Garage
19''-4" x 19'-5"
A4.3 Floor Plans 0 4 8 16 Buildings 1 +2 : Type A Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
P2
Accessible Unit
2 Bedroom2 Baths
±1375 n.s.f.

SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
Bedroom 2
12'-8" x 10'-0"
Primary Bedroom
12'-0" x 14'-4"
Laundry
Primary
Bath
W.I.C
W.H
DN
Bath 2
Str.
29'-0"
31'-4"
COAT Pwdr
13'-3" x 13'-0"
19'-3" x 11'-6"
Dining
Deck
10'-9" x 8'-0"
UP
Great Room
85 s.f.
31'-5"
27'-7"
0 4 8 16
Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" A4.4 Floor Plans Buildings 1 +2 : Type A Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
P3
2 Bedroom2.5 Baths
±1,495 n.s.f.

First Floor Second Floor
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
Bedroom 2
10'-7" x 12'-0"
Bath 2
W.I.C
W.H
Primary Bath
Primary Bedroom
12'-0" x 15'-4"
Laundry
LINEN
DN
32'-2"
27'-1"
12'-0" x 12'-2"
8'-8" x 15'-4"
Dining
COAT
Bath 3
Bedroom 3
10'-7" x 10'-0"
Deck
8'-0" x 7'-6"
UP
Great Room
60 s.f.
32'-2"
26'-3"
A4.5 Floor Plans 0 4 8 16 Buildings 1 +2 : Type A Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
P4
3 Bedroom3 Baths
±1445 n.s.f.

First Floor Second Floor
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
34'-8"
27'-1" Primary Bath
W.H
W.I.C
Bedroom 2
10'-0" x 10'-3"
Primary Bedroom
12'-0" x 13'-0"

LOW LINEN
Bath 2
Laundry
DN
36'-11"
26'-1"
15'-3" x 19'-5"
10'-7" x 12'-10"
Dining
Bedroom 3
10'-0" x 10'-0"
Bath 3
COAT
Deck
9'-11" x 7'-6"
UP
Great Room
75 s.f.

PANTRY
0 4 8 16
Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" A4.6 Floor Plans Buildings 1 + 2 : Type A Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
P5L
3 Bedroom3 Baths
±1,570 n.s.f.

First Floor Second Floor
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
Primary Bath
W.H
W.I.C
Bedroom 2
Primary Bedroom 10'-0" x 12'-2"
14'-3" x 13'-0"
DN

LOW LINEN
Bath 2
Laundry
34'-8"
25'-1"
10'-7" x 12'-10"
Dining
Bedroom 3
10'-0" x 10'-0"
Bath 3
COAT
Deck
9'-11" x 7'-6"
UP
75 s.f.
15'-3" x 19'-5"
Great Room
36'-11"
26'-1"
0 4 8 16
Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" A4.7 Floor Plans Buildings 1 + 2 : Type A Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
P5R
3 Bedroom3 Baths
±1,500 n.s.f.

First Floor Second Floor
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
12'-10" x 13'-7"
14'-2" x 10'-1"
Dining
Deck
12'-5" x 8'-0"
Great Room
100 s.f.

UP
33'-10"
26'-10"
W.I.C
P. Bath
LINEN
Primary Bedrm
12'-0" x 14'-8"
Bedroom 2
10'-0" x 10'-8"
Bedroom 3
10'-0" x 10'-8"
W.H
DN Bath 2
37'-9"
32'-8"
0 4 8 16
Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" A4.8 Floor Plans Buildings 1 + 2 : Type A Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
P6
3 Bedroom

2.5 Baths
±1,680 n.s.f.

First Floor Second Floor
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
31'-0"
133'-6"
Two Car
Garage
22''-6" x 20'-0"
Two Car
Garage
20''-0" x 20'-0"
Two Car
Garage
20''-0" x 20'-0"
Two Car
Garage
20''-0" x 20'-0"
Two Car
Garage
20''-0" x 20'-0"
Two Car
Garage
22''-6" x 20'-0"
35'-0"
133'-6"
First Floor
Second Floor
A5.0 Building Plans 0 4 8 16 Townhome Buildings 3 + 4 : Type B Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" P3 P2 P1 P2 P1P3 P2 P1 P2 P1
P3P3
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #1
OCTOBER 19, 2020
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
133'-6"
35'-0"
Solar Zone Solar Zone Solar Zone Solar Zone Solar Zone Solar Zone Roof Deck Roof Deck Roof Deck Roof Deck Roof Deck Roof Deck 134'-1"
35'-0"
Third Floor
Roof
0 4 8 16
Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0"
P3 P2 P1 P2 P1P3 P2 P1 P2 P1
A5.1 Building Plans Townhome Buildings 3 + 4 : Type B
P3P3
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #1
OCTOBER 19, 2020
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
SUBMITTAL #3DECEMBER 22, 2021
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
145'-8"
49'-7" Two Car Garage
22''-6" x 20'-0"
Two Car
Garage
20''-0" x 20'-0"
Two Car
Garage
20''-0" x 20'-0"
Two Car
Garage
20''-0" x 20'-0"
Two Car
Garage
20''-0" x 20'-0"
Single Car
Garage
12''-6" x 22'-0"
Single Car
Garage
20''-0" x 15'-0"
49'-7"
143'-4"
First Floor
Second Floor
A5.2 Building Plans 0 4 8 16 Townhome Buildings 5-8 : Type C Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" P3 P1 P2 P1 P2 PB PA
P3 P1 P2 P1 P2 PB PA
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #1
OCTOBER 19, 2020
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
(2-story unit)(2-story unit)
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
143'-4"
49'-7"
Roof Deck Roof Deck Roof Deck Roof Deck Roof Deck
Solar Zone Solar Zone Solar Zone Solar Zone Solar Zone
143'-4"
49'-7"
Third Floor
Roof
0 4 8 16
Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0"
P3 P1 P2 P1 P2 PB PA
P3 P1 P2 P1 P2 PB PA
A5.3 Building Plans Townhome Buildings 5 - 8 : Type C
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
(2-story unit)
(2-story unit)
RoofRoofBelow
Roof
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
31'-0"
21'-0"
Solar Zone
12'-0" x 9'-0"
(108 s.f.)
up
dn
Roof
Deck
13'-0" x 18'-0"
Bath
2 Bedroom 2
10'-4" x 10'-10"
W.I.C.
13'-3" l.f.

Hall
Master
Bath
Master
Bedroom
12'-10" x 13'-4"
Laund.

Kitchen
Great Room
16'-6" x 21'-7"
dn
dn
up up
Pdr.

Entry
Garage
20'-3" x 20'-0"
32'-6"
21'-0"
34'-6"
21'-0"
34'-6"
21'-0"
P1
2 Bedroom2.5 Baths
±1520 n.s.f.

Second Floor First Floor
A5.4 Floor Plans 024 8 Townhome Buildings: 3 - 8 : Type B & C Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" Roof Third Floor
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #1
OCTOBER 19, 2020
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
SUBMITTAL #3DECEMBER 22, 2021
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
31'-0"
21'-0"
dn
up
Solar Zone
12'-0" x 9'-0"
(108 s.f.)
Roof
Deck
13'-0" x 22'-5"
Bath
3 Bath
2 Bedroom 3
10'-0" x 10'-4"
Bedroom 2
10'-6" x 10'-10"
W.I.C.
13'-3" l.f.

Open to
Below
Hall
Master
Bath
Master
Bedroom
13'-0" x 12'-10"
Laund.

Kitchen
Great Room
16'-6" x 13'-4"
Entry
Garage
20'-3" x 20'-0"
dn dn
up
up
34'-6"
21'-0"
34'-6"
21'-0"
34'-6"
21'-0"
P2
3 Bedroom3 Baths
±1580 n.s.f.
024 8
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Roof Third Floor Second Floor First Floor
A5.5 Unit Plans Townhome Buildings: 3 - 8 : Type B & C
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #1
OCTOBER 19, 2020
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
SUBMITTAL #3DECEMBER 22, 2021
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
24'-4"
30'-0"
Solar Zone
14'-0" x 9'-0"
(126 s.f.)
up
Roof
Deck
15'-0" x 22'-6"
dn
Open to
Below
Bath
2 Bedroom 3
10'-0" x 10'-2"
Bedroom 2
10'-0" x 9'-8"
W.I.C.
12'-0" l.f.

Hall
Master
Bath
Master
Bedroom
16'-2" x 12'-4"
Laund.

Kitchen
Great Room
19'-8" x 24'-2"
Pdr.

Entry
Garage
20'-3" x 20'-0"
dn
dn
up up
35'-0"
35'-0"
35'-0"
24'-4" 24'-4" 24'-4"
P3
3 Bedroom

2.5 Baths
±1740 n.s.f.
024 8
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Roof Third Floor Second Floor First Floor
A5.6 Unit Plans Townhome Buildings: 3 - 8 : Type B - C
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #1
OCTOBER 19, 2020
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
SUBMITTAL #3DECEMBER 22, 2021
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
23'-0"
49'-7"
W.I.C.
10'-9" l.f.

Master
Bath
Master
Bedroom
15'-8" x 14'-0"
W.I.C.
18'-0" l.f.

Hall
opt.
sink
Laund.

Bath
2 Bedroom 2
Suite
13'-4" x 11'-4"
low
linen
Tankless
W.h.
coats /
storage
ac pad
1-Car
Garage
T T 20'-0" x 15'-0" T
drop
zone
Pdr.
p
Kitchen
Dining
9'-0" x 17'-6"
media
wall
Great Room
13'-6" x 13'-0"
Entry
Porch
Parking Space
10' x 20' Clear Req'd
dn
up
20'-8"
49'-7"
PA
2 Bedroom2.5 Baths
±1400 n.s.f.
024 8
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Second Floor First Floor
A5.7 Unit Plans Townhome Buildings: 5 - 8 : Type C
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #1
OCTOBER 19, 2020
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
SUBMITTAL #3DECEMBER 22, 2021
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
17'-6"
36'-1"
Hall
Bedroom 2
Suite
10'-6" x 10'-0"
Bath 2
opt.
dr.

Master
Bath
Master
Bedroom
13'-0" x 12'-4"
W.I.C.
12'-0" l.f.

Kitchen
p
media
wall
Great Room
13'-0" x 21'-0"
Deck
12'-9" x 5'-6"
70 s.f.

Pdr.

Laund.
coats
storage
Tankless
W.h.
ac pad
dn dn
up up
Entry
T
T
T
1-Car
Garage
12'-9" x 22'-0"
Parking Space
10' x 20' Clear Req'd
17'-6"
39'-11"
17'-6"
39'-11"
PB
2 Bedroom2.5 Baths
±1320 n.s.f.
024 8
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Third Floor Second Floor First Floor
A5.8 Floor Plans Townhome Buildings: 5 - 8 : Type C
Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #1
OCTOBER 19, 2020
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598
SUBMITTAL #3DECEMBER 22, 2021
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit
Accessible Unit
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
5FT Setback
Lane B
Lane C
Lane D
Lane A
ENTRY
OPEN
SPACE
2000 SF
ENTRY
CALABAZAS BLVD.

EL CAMINO REAL
BLDG
7 Type
C
BLDG
8 Type
C
BLDG
6 Type
C
BLDG
5 Type
C
BLDG
4 Type
B
BLDG
3 Type
B
BLDG 1
Type A
BLDG 2
Type A
A6.0 Colors and Materials Board Buildings 1 + 2 : Type A

1. Type A - Front Elevation
0 4 8 16
Key Map n.t.s.
1 Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598

1. Stucco

7. Vinyl Window

2. Stucco

10. Metal Awning/ Trellis

3. Stucco 4. Stucco

8. Stone Veneer Patio 9. Metal Railing
medium

6. Composite Lap Siding

5. Metal Railing
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit
Accessible Unit
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
5FT Setback
Lane B
Lane C
Lane D
Lane A
ENTRY
OPEN
SPACE
2000 SF
ENTRY
CALABAZAS BLVD.

EL CAMINO REAL
BLDG
7 Type
C
BLDG
8 Type
C
BLDG
6 Type
C
BLDG
5 Type
C
BLDG
4 Type
B
BLDG
3 Type
B
BLDG 1
Type A
BLDG 2
Type A
A6.1 Colors and Materials Board Buildings 3 + 4 : Type B Key Map n.t.s.
0 4 8 16
1 Architecture + Planning
1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400
Oakland, CA 94612
510.272.2910
ktgy.com
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 22, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2019-0598

1. Stucco

7. Vinyl Window

2. Stucco

9. Metal Trellis

3. Stucco 4. Stucco

8. Metal Railing

5. Roof

6. Composite Lap Siding 10. Stone Veneer Patio Light

11. Stone Veneer Patio Medium

1. Type B - Front Elevation
SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
Note: Lighting for the project to be at the IES
(Illuminating Engineering Society of North America)standards and include the features listed below:White light source, Pedestrian Scale, Full cut-off orshoebox design, Unbreakable exterior,TamperproofHousings, Wall mounted lights/10’ high. Thesefeatures increase natural surveillance, supportand/or enhance security camera capabilities, andincrease Police Patrol effectiveness.

SUBMITTAL #2
AUGUST 17, 2021
SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 20, 2021

GOOD NEIGHBOR FENCE
22 SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022

EL CAMINO REAL
CALABAZAS BLVD.

Note: Tree appropriate for use under
overhead power lines. Source: SVP
Note: Provide root
barrier.

Note: Provide root
barrier.

Note: Provide root
barrier.
6 CER CAN
24" BOX STD
4 LAG TUS
24" BOX STD
6 LAG TUS
24" BOX STD
5 CER CAN
24" BOX STD
6 ARB MAR
24" BOX STD
5 OLE SH
24" BOX STD
22 OLE SH
24" BOX STD
6 TRI LAU
24" BOX STD
1 LAG TUS
24" BOX STD
107
LAV
19 MUH
23 PIT
15 ASP
27 DIE
35 DIE
18 ASP
15 ANI
14 POL
14 POL
32 LAV
16 ACC
47 LAV
37 ACC
47 CAL
226
LOM
42 CAL
94 ANI
12 AGA
2 PIT
57 ERI
5 PIT
22 LOM
248
PMU
30 CAA
1050sf
NOM
14 PIT
26 PRU
3 PIT
47 LOM
130
JUN
20 DIE
20 DIE
20 DIE
20 DIE
159
LOM
24 ASP
24 ASP
24 ASP
24 ASP
834sf
SOD
5 LAU NOB
24" BOX STD
3 TRI LAU
24" BOX STD
3 ACE BUE
24" BOX STD
6 CAL VIM
24" BOX STD 139
SES
41 ILE
9 LAG
28 RHA
10 ARC
58 POL
21 RHA
6 ARC
35 PHD
32 ILE
40 MUH
9 VIB
40 ILE
41 CAR
8 LAT
33 IRI
35 MUH
160
DIA
30 SAL
42 SES
7 ERI
32 PHD
23 ERI
166
DIA
10 SAL
46 CHO
43 MUH
33 IRI
58 CAR
41 ILE
7 VIB
7 ALY
45 ILE
Note: No planting at ladder
pads, typ.
2 LAG TUS
24" BOX STD
1 MAG GRA
24" BOX STD
Visibility Triangle, typical. No
visual obstructions between 3'
and 10' height range within
triangle. Trees to be trimmed
up to 10' and plants not to
exceed 3' height at maturity.
7 PIT
12 CAA
SUBMITTAL #5
MARCH 31, 2022
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345
THEGUZZARDOPARTNERSHIPINC.

Landscape Architects Land Planners
San Francisco, CA 94111F 415 433 5003181 Greenwich StreetT 415 433 4672 Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"
N
0 8 16 32
L-3 SCHEMATIC PLANTING PLAN

PRELIMINARY PLANT LIST
Planting Notes:
x Provide root barriers when the drip line of the mature trees covers the sidewalk.

Root barriers for sidewalk protection shall be 16' long or extend to drip line of the mature tree, whichever is greater, and be 1.5' deep, and centered on trees. Rootbarriers for curb and gutter protection shall be 16' long or extend to drip line of themature tree, whichever is greater, and be 2’ deep, and centered on trees. x Landscaping should follow the National Institute of Crime Prevention standards.

Shrubs not to exceed 2’ in height at maturity, or maintained at that height, and the canopies of trees should not be lower than 6’ in height. Crime deterrent vegetation is encouraged along the fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows. x Recycled Water Ready: All onsite plumbing for non-domestic water uses (e.g. irrigation) shall be designed for recycled water use and shall comply with all Recycled Water regulations.

EL CAMINO REAL
CALABAZAS BLVD.

Ladder Pad Section C
2-Story Townhomes
Ladder Pad Section B
3-Story Townhomes
Ladder Pad Section A
3-Story Townhomes with Balconies
Ladder pad, typical
Ladder pads in planting
areas to be stabilized
DG surface, typical.

SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 20, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345
THEGUZZARDOPARTNERSHIPINC.

Landscape Architects Land Planners
San Francisco, CA 94111F 415 433 5003181 Greenwich StreetT 415 433 4672 Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"
N
0 8 16 32
L-4 LADDER PAD EXHIBIT
Finish Grade
Face of Building Face of Building Section B: 3-Story Townhomes Ladder Pad Diagram
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
3rd floor operable egress
window sill
Ladder at 70 degrees to 3rd
floor window sill
5'
Plan View
4'
EQ EQ
Ladder pad - Stabilized
DG or Paving, per plan
Ladder pad, 4'x5' -
Stabilized DG or Paving,
per plan
Ladder
5'
4' 5'
2%
C/L of operable egress
window or patio
70°
Face of Building Finish Grade
Section A: 3-Story Townhomes with Balconies
3rd floor balcony guardrail
Ladder at 70 degrees to 3rd
floor balcony guardrail
5'
Ladder pad - StabilizedDG or Paving, per plan
4'
2% 70°
Face of Building Finish Grade
2nd floor BedroomRoof
Section C: 2-Story Townhomes
2nd floor operable egress
window sill
Ladder at 70 degrees to
2nd floor window sill
5'
Ladder pad - Stabilized
DG or Paving, per plan
4'
2%
Sill of egress
window
70°
2'
Assumed
3rd floor BedroomRoof
Sill of egress
window
2'
Assumed
Townhome trellises, per plan
3rd floor Bedroom
Balcony
3'-6"
Assumed
Roof
22 SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022

IRR IRR IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR

EL CAMINO REAL
CALABAZAS BLVD.

SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 20, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345
THEGUZZARDOPARTNERSHIPINC.

Landscape Architects Land Planners
San Francisco, CA 94111F 415 433 5003181 Greenwich StreetT 415 433 4672 Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"
N
0 8 16 32
L-5 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
Note: No cutting of any part of private trees,
including roots, shall be done without securing prior
approval of the City Arborist. Tree trimming/removal
shall be done in accordance to the City of Santa
Clara Tree Preservation/City Arborist specifications
and with direct supervision of a certified arborist
(Certification of International Society of
Arboriculture). Refer to sheet L5.1 for City Arborist
Specifications.

TREE DISPOSITION LEGEND Key Description Qty
Total Existing Trees
On Site
Existing Trees to beRemovedExisting Trees toRemain
Total Proposed Trees,
24" box min.
(Note: Refer to Plant
List, sheet L-3)
1616
0 93
22 SUBMITTAL #4
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
81 SUBMITTAL #3
DECEMBER 20, 2021
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345
THEGUZZARDOPARTNERSHIPINC.

Landscape Architects Land Planners
San Francisco, CA 94111F 415 433 5003181 Greenwich StreetT 415 433 4672 Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"
N
0 8 16 32
L-5.1 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN 22 SUBMITTAL #4 FEBRUARY 11, 2022 3155 EL CAMINO REAL

SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA

SHEET INDEX
SITE ADDRESSSURVEY NOTE:FLOOD HAZARD NOTE:BASIS OF BEARINGS:BENCHMARK:

VICINITY MAP
ABBREVIATION: LEGEND:

Submittal #4
02/11/2022
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345
SHEET OF 10
SITE

CALABASAS BOULEVARD

EL CAMINO REAL
LOT 1
GROSS AREA 2.44± AC
NET AREA 2.41± AC
TITLE SHEET 1
C1.0

IRR IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
SR-82 EL CAMINO REAL

CALABAZAS BLVD

PARCEL ONE
APN 220-32-057A=1.879± AC

PARCEL TWO
APN 220-32-058A=0.561± AC
Submittal #4
02/11/2022
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345
SHEET OF 10 2
BASIS OF BEARINGS:BENCHMARK:

LEGEND
GENERAL NOTES:

CONSTRUCTION SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT NOTES
C2.0

EXISTING CONDITIONS &PRELIMINARY REMOVAL PLAN
FF 86.90
FF 84.50
FF 87.65
FF 84.85
FF 85.00
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
A A
B B
F F
E E
D
D
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50 FF 84.50
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
CC
Submittal #4
02/11/2022
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 3 SHEET OF 10
C3.0

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABAZAS BOULEVARD
GENERAL GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES:LEGEND

CALABAZAS BOULEVARD

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABAZAS BLVD

0.07 AC
5 0.47 AC
1 0.16 AC
2 0.08 AC
3 0.06 AC
4 0.44 AC
10 0.06 AC
9 0.44 AC
10 0.02 AC
11 0.35 AC
8 0.60 AC
7 0.03 AC
12 0.10 AC
6 Submittal #4
02/11/2022
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345
STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN 4 SHEET OF 10
LEGEND
X.X AC
X
C4.0

BIORETENTION BASIN W/ LINER
TABLE 1

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES FOR BIORETENTION AREAS
NO. MAINTENANCE TASK FREQUENCY OF TASK
1 REMOVE OBSTRUCTIONS, WEEDS, DEBRIS AND TRASH FROM BIORETENTION AREA AND ITS INLETS AND OUTLETS; AND DISPOSE OF PROPERLY. QUARTERLY, OR AS NEEDED AFTER STORM EVENTS 2 INSPECT BIORETENTION AREA FOR STANDING WATER. IF STANDING WATER DOES NOT DRAIN WITHIN 2-3 DAYS, TILL AND REPLACE THE SURFACE BIOTREATMENT SOIL WITH THE APPROVED SOIL MIX AND REPLANT.

QUARTERLY, OR AS NEEDED

AFTER STORM EVENTS
3 CHECK UNDERDRAINS FOR CLOGGING. USE THE CLEANOUT RISER TO CLEAN ANY CLOGGED UNDERDRAINS. QUARTERLY, OR AS NEEDED AFTER STORM EVENTS 4 MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND ENSURE THAT PLANTS ARE RECEIVING THE CORRECT AMOUNT OF WATER (IF APPLICABLE). QUARTERLY 5 ENSURE THAT THE VEGETATION IS HEALTHY AND DENSE ENOUGH TO PROVIDEFILTERING AND PROTECT SOILS FROM EROSION. PRUNE AND WEED THE BIORETENTION AREA. REMOVE AND/OR REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANTS.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
6 USE COMPOST AND OTHER NATURAL SOIL AMENDMENTS AND FERTILIZERS

INSTEAD OF SYNTHETIC FERTILIZERS, ESPECIALLY IF THE SYSTEM USES AN UNDERDRAIN.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
7 CHECK THAT MULCH IS AT APPROPRIATE DEPTH (2 - 3 INCHES PER SOIL SPECIFICATIONS) AND REPLENISH AS NECESSARY BEFORE WET SEASON BEGINS.

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 2” – 3” OF ARBOR MULCH BE REAPPLIED EVERY YEAR.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
8 INSPECT THE ENERGY DISSIPATION AT THE INLET TO ENSURE IT IS FUNCTIONING ADEQUATELY, AND THAT THERE IS NO SCOUR OF THE SURFACE MULCH. REMOVEACCUMULATED SEDIMENT.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
9 INSPECT OVERFLOW PIPE TO ENSURE THAT IT CAN SAFELY CONVEY EXCESS FLOWS TO A STORM DRAIN. REPAIR OR REPLACE DAMAGED PIPING.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
10 REPLACE BIOTREATMENT SOIL AND MULCH, IF NEEDED. CHECK FOR STANDING WATER, STRUCTURAL FAILURE AND CLOGGED OVERFLOWS. REMOVE TRASH AND DEBRIS. REPLACE DEAD PLANTS.
11 INSPECT BIORETENTION AREA USING THE ATTACHED INSPECTION CHECKLIST. ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET SEASON Submittal #4
02/11/2022
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345
STORMWATER CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS 5 SHEET OF 10
C4.1
TABLE 1

QUARTERLY, OR AS NEEDED

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
6 USE COMPOST AND OTHER NATURAL SOIL AMENDMENTS AND FERTILIZERS

INSTEAD OF SYNTHETIC FERTILIZERS, ESPECIALLY IF THE SYSTEM USES AN UNDERDRAIN.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
7 CHECK THAT MULCH IS AT APPROPRIATE DEPTH (2 - 3 INCHES PER SOILSPECIFICATIONS) AND REPLENISH AS NECESSARY BEFORE WET SEASON BEGINS.

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 2” – 3” OF ARBOR MULCH BE REAPPLIED EVERY YEAR.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
8 INSPECT THE ENERGY DISSIPATION AT THE INLET TO ENSURE IT IS FUNCTIONING ADEQUATELY, AND THAT THERE IS NO SCOUR OF THE SURFACE MULCH. REMOVEACCUMULATED SEDIMENT.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

SEASON BEGINS
9 INSPECT OVERFLOW PIPE TO ENSURE THAT IT CAN SAFELY CONVEY EXCESS FLOWS TO A STORM DRAIN. REPAIR OR REPLACE DAMAGED PIPING.

ANNUALLY, BEFORE THE WET

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
INFORMATION:

I. PROPERTY INFORMATION:II. RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR MAINTENANCE:

Submittal #4
02/11/2022
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345
MEDIA FILTER NOTES 6 SHEET OF 10
C4.2
TABLE 1

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES FOR MEDIA FILTERS
NO. MAINTENANCE TASK FREQUENCY OF TASK
1 INSPECT FOR STANDING WATER, SEDIMENT, TRASH AND DEBRIS. MONTHLY DURING RAINY SEASON 2 REMOVE ACCUMULATED TRASH AND DEBRIS IN THE UNIT DURING ROUTINE INSPECTIONS. MONTHLY DURING RAINY SEASON, OR AS NEEDED AFTER STORM EVENTS 3 INSPECT TO ENSURE THAT THE FACILITY IS DRAINING COMPLETELY WITHIN FIVE DAYS AND PER MANUFACTURER’S SPECIFICATIONS. ONCE DURING THE WET SEASON AFTER MAJOR STORM EVENT. 4 REPLACE THE MEDIA PER MANUFACTURER’S INSTRUCTIONS OR AS INDICATED BY THE CONDITION OF THE UNIT. PER MANUFACTURER’S SPECIFICATIONS. 5 INSPECT MEDIA FILTERS USING THE ATTACHED INSPECTION CHECKLIST. QUARTERLY OR AS NEEDED 20 20
20 20
20 20
20 25
25 19
19 20
Submittal #4
02/11/2022
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345
UTILITY PLAN 7 SHEET OF 10
C5.0
GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABAZAS BOULEVARD
LEGEND
20 20
20 20
20 20
20 25
25 19
19 20
5 1
20 2
20 20
2 0
25 9 20
Submittal #4
02/11/2022
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345
COMPOSITE TREE PLAN 8 SHEET OF 10
C5.1

GENERAL COMPOSITE TREE PLAN NOTES

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABAZAS BOULEVARD
LEGEND

SECTION A SECTION B

TOWNHOME
FF 84.50

SECTION C

SECTION E

TOWNHOME
FF 84.85

SECTION F

TOWNHOME
FF 85.00

SECTION D
BUILDING 1
FF 87.65

TOWNHOME
FF 84.50

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABAZAS BLVD

STANDARD THRU DRAIN
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
EASE

TOWNHOME
FF 84.85

TOWNHOME
FF 84.50

TOWNHOME
FF 84.50
SECTIONS & DETAILS 9
C6.0 Submittal #4 02/11/2022 3155 EL CAMINO SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345 SHEET OF 10

A A A A
BLDG 3
12,940 SF
BLDG 4
12,940 SF
BLDG 5
14,440 SF
BLDG 6
14,440 SF
BLDG 7
14,440 SF
BLDG 8
14,440 SF
BLDG 1
24,255 SF
BLDG 2
24,255 SF

SECTION A

TOWNHOME
FF 84.50

TOWNHOME
FF 84.50
Submittal #4
02/11/2022
3155 EL CAMINO
SANTA CLARA CA # 2018-0345
FIRE LAYOUT PLAN 10 SHEET OF 10
C7.0

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABAZAS BOULEVARD
LEGEND

MATERIALS SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES:

FIRE SERVICE NOTES:

FIRE PROTECTION NOTES:

Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit
Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit
Accessible Unit
Trash
BLDG 7 :

Type C
BLDG 8 :

Type C
BLDG 6 :

Type C
BLDG 5 :

Type C
BLDG 4 :

Type B
BLDG 3 :

Type B
BLDG 2 : Type A BLDG 1 : Type A

LOADING
STALL
HC
STALL
20 20
20 20
20 20
20 25
25 19
19 20

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABASAS BOULEVARD
LOT 1
A=2.44± AC

VICINITY MAP

LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS
X X X
SITE

VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
OF 4
GENERAL NOTES:BASIS OF BEARINGSBENCHMARK
NOTES
1 IRR IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABASAS BOULEVARD
LOT 1
A=2.44± AC

VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
2 OF 4

LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS
X X X
FF 86.90
FF 84.50
FF 87.65
FF 84.85
FF 85.00
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50 FF 84.50
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
A A
B B
F F
D D
E
E
C
C

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABASAS BOULEVARD

VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
3 OF 4

LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS
X X X

SECTION A SECTION B

TOWNHOME
FF 84.50

SECTION C

SECTION E

TOWNHOME
FF 84.85

SECTION F

TOWNHOME
FF 85.00

SECTION D
BUILDING 1
FF 87.65

TOWNHOME
FF 84.50

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABAZAS BLVD
PATIO
FF 84.85

STANDARD THRU DRAIN
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
EASE

TOWNHOME
FF 84.85

TOWNHOME
FF 84.50

VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
4 OF 4
x
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

ELECTRIC AND GAS SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

JOINT TRENCH TITLE SHEET
1" = 30'
JT-1
1 SCALE:PM:PG&E QUALIFIED DESIGNER:DRAWN BY:PROJ. NO:SHEET: OF:

CALIFORNIA
LAST UPDATED:DRAWING NO:

REVISION DELTA NO: DATE:
2#460'45
7901 STONERIDGE DRIVE, Suite 200 | PLEASANTON, CA 94588 Tel (925) 682-1114

UTILITY ENGINEERS, CONSULTANTS & STREETLIGHT DESIGN
}¡G| NEW BUSINESS
2 R. FALCON
K. MENDOZA
20-055

SANTA CLARA BAYVIEW DEVELOPMENT GROUP
3141-3155 EL CAMINO REAL
02-11-2022

DATE OF SIGNATURE
-----
IRR
IRR
IRR
IRR
20 20
20 20
20 20
20 25
25 19
19 20
20 20
20 20
20 20
20 25
25 19
19 CONCRETE
APRON
20 CONCRETE
APRON
19 2025

JOINT TRENCH INTENT
1" = 30'
JT-2
2 SCALE:PM:PG&E QUALIFIED DESIGNER:DRAWN BY:PROJ. NO:SHEET: OF:

CALIFORNIA
LAST UPDATED:DRAWING NO:

REVISION DELTA NO: DATE:
2#460'45
7901 STONERIDGE DRIVE, Suite 200 | PLEASANTON, CA 94588 Tel (925) 682-1114

UTILITY ENGINEERS, CONSULTANTS & STREETLIGHT DESIGN
}¡G| NEW BUSINESS
2 R. FALCON
K. MENDOZA
20-055

SANTA CLARA BAYVIEW DEVELOPMENT GROUP
3141-3155 EL CAMINO REAL
02-11-2022

DATE OF SIGNATURE
-----
IRR

IRR IRR IRR
20 20
20 20
20 20
20 25
25 19
19 20
20 20
20 20
20 25
25 20 ARROW
TRANSF. LOCATING
26 20
19 19
20 EF/A2
ES/L2
EU/E2
F/A2
S/L2

UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE ENTRANCE BY
U/E2 U/E UTILITY/ELECTRICAL
F/A FIRE ALARMS/L OR ST. LT. STREET LIGHTCLARA BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION CODES.DEVELOPER IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF SANTA 13 31
9 11 12 13
20 23
15 18 19
26 26
2524
25 24
19 19
21 21
18 18
13 34

EXISTING

USE OF CONDUIT

EXISTING
(ABOVE NOTATION TYPICAL)

NUMBER OF CONDUITS

SIZE OF CONDUIT
E2P5E2S5
2P52S5
"A" OR "B"
PB-ID#
TYPE "A" OR "B"
PLEE
SHEET 34
COUPLINGS ANYWHERE ON THIS JOB. ONLY USE

CONDUITS/TRENCH INSTALL PER NOTE

ELECTRICAL EASEMENTPROPERTY LINE

S OR SEC SECONDARYP OR PRI PRIMARY

LOW VOLTAGE PULL BOX

PER NOTE

PER NOTE
LVPB
PB
DEPT. UNDERGROUND ENGINEERING
GUARD PIPE PER NOTETYPE "A" OR "B" AS REQUIRED
PRIMARY PULLBOX PER NOTELABEL "PB-ID#" (USE ID# SHOWN
(AS NOTED ON PLAN)S/L, LV, OR U/E
FOR TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION SEE UG-1000 REV.5
BENDS WHERE CALLED FOR BY CONSTRUCTION NOTE.

NOTE!!! DO NOT USE FLEX CONDUIT, OR DEGREE

NEW/INSTALL
MH-ID#V-ID#
REVISION 5.SEE THE CORRESPONDING PAGE NUMBER IN UG-1000

FOR DETAILS OF THESE BALLOON NOTE NUMBERS

ON PLAN)ON PLAN)
MH
V
REV. 5UG-1000
STANDARD, REVISION NUMBER 5.CITY OF SANTA CLARA ELECTRIC PRIMARY SWITCH VAULT PER NOTEPRIMARY MANHOLE PER NOTELABEL "MH-ID#" (USE ID# SHOWNLABEL "V-ID#" (USE ID# SHOWNON PLAN) 32 16
33 34 37
LEGEND
SPLICE BOX U/E 20 20
14 14
ARROW
TRANSF. LOCATING

CONCRETEAPRON
TRANSFORMER PAD PER NOTE 15 15

SINGLE COMMUNAL

TRASH ENCLOSURE

MINIMUM UNOBSTRUCTED OPENING
3CY FL
LOOSE

CONTAINERRECYCLING
3CY FL
LOOSE

CONTAINERRECYCLING
3CY FLLOOSE

CONTAINER
WASTE3CY FLLOOSE

CONTAINER
WASTE

AMERICAN TRASH MANAGEMENT
1900 POWELL STREET, SUITE 220
EMERYVILLE, CALIFORNIA 94608P: 415.292.5400F: 415.292.5410 [email protected]

DRAWING TITLE
3155 EL CAMINO

SANTA CLARA, CA
PROJECT NO.PROJECT
DU
DRAWN

APPROVED
DATE
SCALE
DRAWING NO.

CONSULTANT

SITE PLAN
T0.1

ARCHITECT

OWNER / DEVELOPER
NO. DATE ISSUED BY ISSUE / REVISION
KTGY

BAYVIEW DEVELOPMENT GROUP
SB

12.20.21 SUBMITTAL #2
02/11/2022
WASTE - 3CY - LOOSE
RECYCLING - 3CY - LOOSE

SINGLE ENCLOSURE PROJECTED TRASH COLLECTION SCHEDULE / WK

SERVICE M T WT F S
2 2
10"Wx3"H WALL PROTECTION
OR 6" DIAMETER BOLLARDS/ANGLE IRONS

MINIMUM UNOBSTRUCTED OPENING
HOLD OPEN USING JHOOK & SLEEVE WITHDOORS OPEN AT 180°

WHEN SERVICING
3CY FL
LOOSE

CONTAINER

RECYCLING
3CY FL
LOOSE

CONTAINER

RECYCLING
3CY FL
LOOSE

CONTAINER
WASTE
3CY FL
LOOSE

CONTAINER
WASTE
2 2

TRASH ENCLOSURE LAYOUT

SINGLE TRASH ENCLOSURE (RESIDENTIAL ACCESS)

AMERICAN TRASH MANAGEMENT
1900 POWELL STREET, SUITE 220
EMERYVILLE, CALIFORNIA 94608P: 415.292.5400F: 415.292.5410 [email protected]

DRAWING TITLE
3155 EL CAMINO

SANTA CLARA, CA
PROJECT NO.PROJECT
DU
DRAWN

APPROVED
DATE
SCALE
DRAWING NO.

CONSULTANT

TRASH ENCLOSURE LAYOUT
T0.2

ARCHITECT

OWNER / DEVELOPER
NO. DATE ISSUED BY ISSUE / REVISION
KTGY

BAYVIEW DEVELOPMENT GROUP
SB

12.20.21 SUBMITTAL #2
3/16" = 1'-0"

12.22.21 02/11/2022

MINIMUM UNOBSTRUCTED OPENING
3CY FL
LOOSE

CONTAINERRECYCLING
3CY FL
LOOSE

CONTAINER
WASTE
3CY FL
LOOSE

CONTAINER
WASTE

AMERICAN TRASH MANAGEMENT
1900 POWELL STREET, SUITE 220
EMERYVILLE, CALIFORNIA 94608P: 415.292.5400F: 415.292.5410 [email protected]

DRAWING TITLE
3155 EL CAMINO

SANTA CLARA, CA
PROJECT NO.PROJECT
DU
DRAWN

APPROVED
DATE
SCALE
DRAWING NO.

CONSULTANT
OPTION 2: SERVICE LOCATION

LOOSE FRONT-LOAD SERVICE
T0.3

ARCHITECT

OWNER / DEVELOPER
NO. DATE ISSUED BY ISSUE / REVISION
KTGY

BAYVIEW DEVELOPMENT GROUP
SB

12.20.21 SUBMITTAL #2
1/16" = 1'-0"

12.22.21 02/11/2022
Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit
Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit Accessible Unit
Accessible Unit
Trash
BLDG 7 :

Type C
BLDG 8 :

Type C
BLDG 6 :

Type C
BLDG 5 :

Type C
BLDG 4 :

Type B
BLDG 3 :

Type B
BLDG 2 : Type A BLDG 1 : Type A

LOADING
STALL
HC
STALL
20 20
20 20
20 20
20 25
25 19
19 20

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABASAS BOULEVARD
LOT 1
A=2.44± AC

VICINITY MAP

LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS
X X X
SITE

VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
OF 4
GENERAL NOTES:BASIS OF BEARINGSBENCHMARK
NOTES
1 J
[X PROPff?TrL/N£TOB£R[J./0\£0
NEW PROPERTY UN£
£X/STING tASEMllffl/N£
PROPOSfD £AS£11£NT UNE BUILlJINCLINE
W~L
PROPOSmSTORIIOR)JN
PROPOSEl)SANfTARYSEWER
PROPOSfD WHER
AR!:4NWNORCATCHBASIN

COMAIUN/CATIONS VAIJLT
'"'80/WN
DafCTOR
DDECTORCHECKVAl.\f"
EL£Crl?ICAJ.Uill/'TYBOX
°"'"""·
, l-'1'1-'·'" -\>'15--UOT [Oll<Ocf'f,e ""'•C..t.-""'~"-"i,..,_. ...... , "() ,-;)
" ,.,.
.
@ "
4~ " "
TRACT NO. 1677
EL RANCHO CAMINO UNIT NO. 4

10.0' PG&E EASEMENT .vt4

SEPARATE INSTRUMENT
ELITTROUERjsTRITTUGHT
ELECTRICAL VAU!.T
~VALVE"
SAN!fAKYSEWU/Cl£ANOIH
5'CN
SllFUCHf
SPOTEI.IVATION SPOTf/.£VATION(A£RW.J..Y[J{RfITT))
STRfITUGHTBOX
STORIIDRAJNMANHO££
mAFT/CSJCNAI..BOX
TRANSFORll[R
umn,a,mw
/JT/IJTYMANHO£[{rYPfUNKNOWN}
umn,F<)L[
1/l/UlY VAIJLr(TrPtUNKNOWII)
WATUI IIITfR WA/l"R VAL\£

10.0; PG&E EASEMENT vt4

SEPARATE INSTRUMENT
1) ru£1,1£!flS. AS N£f()[(), TOBEDfOOT[() ON Tl/£ FINAL 11,APOR8Y SlPARATEINSrRI.Jl,l[NTS
2) SOM£Do£M£NTS TO BEABANDONm, AS Nff[)£l) TON£CESSfTAT£ SllE DESICN,£rrHERBYTl/£FINAl..lilAPORBYS£P.ARATfltmRIJU£NT.

J) SUBJCCT1VPROJ£CTCUR'S1VB£RfCORDf() 4) =r~liffff,~"! (£V..4.£.) TO Bf {)[J)((;Af[[) TH£ 8£ARJNC, N 89'59'5.J" WT, Of TH£ NORTHEJ?f.Y UNE OF EL OJI/NO RfAl.

AS SHOWN ON "™TC£RTA/N u.lF'Fli.fD FOR RCCORO ON MARCH 5, 1957, IN ~,::, '.r~ PACE 32, S.C.C.R .. WAS TAKEN AS TH£ BASlS OF 80[(/NCS VHWCAL Ol,TUA//SBASED/JPONSCWIVBENCHU,WK/3 1:

A8RASS[)ISJ(fNTH£SJ[)[WAl.)(0NTH£SQl.m/Sl[)[OFTH£CLCWINOR£41..

BRIDC[tMR~CRfEK,IIAVIIICANf/.£VATIONOF88.9JFEU(~~)
I OWNU?/5/JBllMDER:

2. CML ENGINEER/

1.ANOSIJR\lf'rVR:
lW<IINESTMENTGROUP
fiCS/JARKUSTREu.STf/450

5.'NJOS£.CA9511J
ATTN: EDWARDlk/MHON
{650)397- 6289
K£V/NR. ll'EISS: R.C.£ '7967, P. l.S. 7139
DJEOWAROS,R.C.£. 69369
JMH W[~ INC.
1731 TfCHNOWGYDRIVE, SrE/880
SANJOSf, CA 95110
(WB) 286- 4555
J_ ASSESSOR'sPARCfl.NU/.IEJfR: 220- J2- 0574:220- J2- 0S8 ,f EXISTINCZONJNC/l),Nl)US£: lHOROI./CHFARECO/,/ll[RCW..

5. PROPOS£DZON/NC: NOCIWiCf

6. SIJBOMOWAR£4: 2.#:t ACF/fS (CROSS)

2.41:i: ACFl£S (NIT}

7. TOT,'lEX/SIINCLOTS:

8. TOTAI.PHOPOS£DLOTS:

9. EX/SrlNCLANDUSl:

10. PROPOSlOI..ANO US£:

18. FIR£HYOR,4NTS;
0 10' 20' 40' F- I
2LOTS
l lOTOFRESf[)fllr/Al. CONW!,liN/UI,/
ro,,,QSES
COM!.IERCW/RETAfl 60 RfSl{)£NTIAJ. CONOOll/fl!UM UNITS
TO 8£ INST,4/,J.[{) IN CONFORNANC£ WTTH THf
ST,W{)AR()SPfCJflC'.TIONSOFTHfCIT'rOF SNff.4 CIAM TOB£1NSTN..L[[) /NCONFORI.IANC[ 'MT/I TH£ STNNJARDSPfC/f/CATIONSOFrHECllYOF

SANTA C/AM
PAClf!C 00 <t fl.£CrRIC (PCM)
S/UCONVAUEYPOWfR{SW)
AT<l'T
TO 8[1NST,4U[[) ro CONFQRII TO LOCATIONS ! )Ji{)STANDARDSOFrHECfTYOFSANTAC~ 16. T£l£PHON£:

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
FOR RESIOENTW. CONJOl,INIUM POOPOSES
3074 - 3157 D. C>MNO REAL
Pl.N2020-14674
JMH WEms, INC.

Civil fogineering ~Surveying~ Land Plann;ng
17JI T~ch"Oi'>qy O,iv,, Ste/88() San Ja,o. C< 95110
r. 1(•08)286-4555
sm
JOBtlO

IRR IRR

IRR IRR IRR IRR

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABASAS BOULEVARD
LOT 1
A=2.44± AC

VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
2 OF 4

LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS
X X X
-1
I
'L ILei
I Lei De'.
u
U)
<C
U)
<C
co
-s
<C
u y STOP
I (I
! I
i
I
l
I
I I
'I
I
'
,

EX PROPU?lYIJNf
[X PROPff?lYL/N[TOB£R[J./0\£0
NEW PROPERTY UN£
£X/STINGtASEMllffl/N£
PROPOSfD £AS£11£NT UNE BUILlJINCLINE
FFNCUIN[
W~L
PROPOSmSTORIIOR)JN
PROPOSEl)SANfTARYSEWER
PROPOSfD WHER
AR!:4NWNORCATCHBASIN

COM/JUN/CATIONSVAIJLT
'"'80/WN
DafCTOR
DDECTORCHECKVAL~
EL£Crl?ICAJ.Uill/'TYBOX
.-;) ELITTROUfR/'sTRITTLIGHT
£L£CTRIC,l,L v,wa
" ~VAL,'[ "" SAN!TAKYSEWUICIEANO/H 5'CN
. snrnc,n
SPOT El£VATION
SPOT£1.£V),TJON(,4£RIAI.J..YDO?IITT))
" STRmUGHTBOX @ STORli/ DRAJNMANHOLE
" """'sx;,w_"" ,rm, ,_,,,,,,
umn,=w,
{ /JT/1.JlY J.IANHOf.E{r(PEUNKNOWN} """""" /JT/UlY VALIU {TfPt UNKNOWN) WA/ffi IIUER
WA/l'RVA!.\,£"
! 0 10' 20' F-
'''""""
41)'
I
EXISTING BOUtllAR'r' ~D TOPOGIW'H'I'
FOR RESIOENTW. CONJOl,INIUM POOPOSES
3074 - 3157 D. C>MNO REAL
Pl.N2020-14674
JMH WEms, INC.
.SSHO>N
Civil fogineering ~Surveying~ land Plann;ng
17JI T~ch"Oi'>qy O,iv,, Ste/88() San Ja,o. C< 95110
r.1(•08)286-4555
FF 86.90
FF 84.50
FF 87.65
FF 84.85
FF 85.00
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50
FF 84.50 FF 84.50
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 85.00
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
FF 84.85
A A
B B
F F
D D
E
E
C
C

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABASAS BOULEVARD

VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
3 OF 4

LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS
X X X
J
I '
,
[X PROPff?TrL/N£TOB£R[J./0\£0
NEW PROPERTY UN£
£X/STINGtASEMllffl/N£
PROPOSfD £AS£11£NT UNE BUILlJINCLINE
W~L
PROPOSmSTORIIOR)JN
PROPOSfD WHER
AR!:4NWNORCATCHBASIN

COMAIUN/CATIONSVAIJLT
'"'80/WN
DafCTOR
DDECTORCHECKVAl.\f"
EL£Crl?ICAJ.Uill/'TYBOX
°"'"""·,l-'1'1-'-'"-\>'15--UOT[Oll<Ocf'f,e ""'• C..t.-""'~"-"i,..,_. ...... , "() .-;)
" ""
.
@ "
4~ " "
TRACT NO. 1677
EL RANCHO CAMINO UNIT NO. 4
ELITlROUERjsTRITTUGHr
ELECTRICAL VAU!.T
~VALVE"
SAN!fAKYSEWU/Cl£ANOIH
5'CN
SllFUCHf
SPOTEI.IVATION SPOTf/.£VATIOH(A£RW.J..Y[J{RfITT))
STRfITUGHTBOX
STORIIDRAJNMANHO££
mAFT/CSJCNAI..BOX
TRANSFORll[R
umn,a,mw
/JT/IJTYMANHO£[ {rYPfUNKNOWN}
umn,F<)L[
1/l/UlY VAIJLr(TrPtUNKNOWII)
WATUI IIITfR WA/l"R VAL\£
! 0 10 ' 20' F- ,o• I
PRELJMltv.RY GRADING, DRAW.GE a: UTILITIES
FOR RESIOENTW. CONJOl,INIUM POOPOSES
3074 - 3157 D. C>MNO REAL
Pl.N2020-14674
JMH WEms, INC.

Civil fogineering ~Surveying~ land Plann;ng
17JI T~ch"Oi'>qy O,iv,, Ste/88() San Ja,o. C< 95110
r.1(•08)286-4555
sm
JOBtlO

SECTION A SECTION B

TOWNHOME
FF 84.50

SECTION C

SECTION E

TOWNHOME
FF 84.85

SECTION F

TOWNHOME
FF 85.00

SECTION D
BUILDING 1
FF 87.65

TOWNHOME
FF 84.50

EL CAMINO REAL

CALABAZAS BLVD
PATIO
FF 84.85

STANDARD THRU DRAIN
P/L
P/L
P/L
P/L
EASE

TOWNHOME
FF 84.85

TOWNHOME
FF 84.50

VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
4 OF 4
---
,
-
. .,
-
.
11lOWEl Sl,IOOTH AND BROOfll""---..
• R•.3'/f m>.
<'CtASS "B·. CONCR£T£
________ .,...... · .
°"'"""·,l-'1'1-'-'"-\>'15--UOT[Oll<Ocf'f,e ""'• C..t.-""'~"-"i,..,_. ...... , "() 19"11/N
21·~
TYP[J,PASUC[W.lY
';.:.i:t;-o-, ..... ___ _
, a.=~1&·r.:&.;~:- lh_.,"""""· ... - ,._...,.., __ ,.,
HP[ Q PASSAC[W.t.f IYPECPASSAC[111'A,Y

CURB RA MP AND

I SL A ND PASS AGEW A Y DET A ILS
.::.:::-..:.r.·:-:.-,-, .... •,-:~·w~•....:;..."':.~--::.

REVI S ED S TAND ARD PL AN AS P AIIB

SECTIONS
FOR RESIOENTW. CONJOl,INIUM POOPOSES
3074 - 3157 D. C>MNO REAL
Pl.N2020-14674
JMH WEms, INC.

Civil fogineering ~Surveying~ Land Plann;ng
17JI T~ch"Oi'>qy O,iv,, Ste/88() San Ja,o. C< 95110
To/(408)286-4¾5
sm
JOBtlO
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-883 Agenda Date: 7/12/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Action on Consideration of Installation of Centerline Pavement Striping on Bray Avenue

COUNCIL PILLAR
Enhance Community Engagement and Transparency and Deliver and Enhance High Quality Efficient Services and Infrastructure

BACKGROUND
On August 25, 2020, the Department of Public Works, Traffic Engineering Division, received a request from Council, on behalf of community residents, to perform a traffic calming study for Bray Avenue between Scott Boulevard and Los Padres Boulevard related to resident concerns about vehicles traveling at high rates of speed. Staff communicated that due to COVID-19 implications traffic might be a little lighter than usual, but based on the continued interest in the study staff moved forward with it.

Bray Avenue is an east-west 34-foot wide, two-way, two-lane local residential street with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. This section of Bray Avenue is stop controlled on both ends where it intersects Scott Boulevard and Los Padres Boulevard. The street also intersects five residential streets between Scott Boulevard and Los Padres Boulevard. (Attachment 1, Location Map).

The surrounding area consists of single-family residential to the north of Bray Avenue and commercial to the south. The adjacent properties along Bray Avenue are approximately 70 percent residential in nature. There is a slight S-curvature to the roadway on the west end towards Los Padres Boulevard and there are also various time restricted parking areas along Bray Avenue adjacent to commercial properties and some residential properties.

This report provides an update on staff’s analysis of the situation and is divided into sections to provide the City Council with the following:
1) background information about the City’s Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program, 2) staff analysis of the situation based on recently obtained field data, and 3) possible alternatives for City Council discussion and consideration.

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Overview: On April 27, 1999, City Council approved the City’s Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program (NTCP) and guidelines. The NTCP was established to address and resolve local neighborhood traffic concerns in a systematic manner. The NTCP guidelines are utilized by staff when analyzing traffic calming requests submitted by residents. Traffic calming requests and concerns can vary significantly and the NTCP offers three levels of traffic calming measures (i.e. improvements), which are dependent on the results of studies, data collection City of Santa Clara Page 1 of 4 Printed on 7/8/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-883 Agenda Date: 7/12/2022
and analysis.
· Level 1: Education, public involvement, enforcement efforts, signing, striping, parking controls, and use of the City’s speed radar trailer.
· Level 2: Alterations of the neighborhood street which can include chokers, chicanes, gateways and rumble strips to deter or prohibit a specific action. · Level 3: Measures similar to Level 2 that may alter neighborhood streets, but these measures may also affect overall neighborhood access and require coordination for emergency response. Examples of Level 3 measures include speed humps, traffic circles, median barriers, forced turn channelization, and diagonal diverters.

It is important to note that based on the NTCP, Level 2 or Level 3 traffic calming measures require traffic volumes to be greater than 1,000 and less than 3,500 vehicles per day. Since the NTCP is a Council approved document, any deviation from it requires Council consideration.

Data Collection/Results: To complete the traffic calming study, staff collected speed and volume data along Bray Avenue from September 15, 2020 to September 22, 2020. A summary of the data results for the study area (Attachment 2) are shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Bray Avenue Data Collection Results (09/15/20 to 09/22/20) Location Direction of
Travel
Average Daily
Traffic Volume (#
of Vehicles)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Bray Avenue (Los Padres Boulevard
to Scott Boulevard)
Combined
(Eastbound &
Westbound)
621 28.6
EB only 347 27.4
WB only 274 30.1
Based on the results of the study and the data collected, Bray Avenue had a relatively low volume of traffic and did not exhibit issues with vehicle speeds. However, despite this, staff still looked at opportunities to improve the section of Bray Avenue with Level 1 Traffic Calming Measures. It should also be noted that per the Council-approved NTCP, Bray Avenue does not meet the requirements for Level 2 or 3 traffic calming measures as the Average Daily Traffic Volume of 621 vehicles per day is not greater than 1,000 vehicles per day and the 85th percentile speed of 28.6 mph does not exceed 33 mph.

Related to the Level 1 traffic calming measures, staff looked at options pertaining to striping, roadway markings and signage. Staff studied the possible installation of centerline striping along the subject portion of Bray Avenue. Centerline stripes are used to delineate the separation of traffic lanes that have opposite directions of travel on a roadway and may be installed as two yellow stripes. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) provides regulations and criteria related to installation of centerline stripes. Staff did not recommend the Level 1 traffic calming measure of a centerline stripe on the entire length of Bray Avenue from Scott Boulevard to Los City of Santa Clara Page 2 of 4 Printed on 7/8/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-883 Agenda Date: 7/12/2022
Padres Boulevard as the Average Daily Traffic Volume recorded on Bray Avenue of 621 vehicles per day is not greater than the CAMUTCD guidance of a minimum of 3,000 vehicles per day and the 85th Percentile speed of 28.6 mph on Bray Avenue was found to be within 5 mph of the speed limit. There was also some concern that installing a centerline stripe the entire length of Bray could lead to increased speeds.

However, staff did analyze the potential for a centerline stripe on a curved portion of Bray Avenue and recommended that a centerline stripe be installed in that area. The area is along the “S” curve section of Bray Avenue on the west end towards Los Padres Boulevard and the striping was added to help delineate the lanes due to the curvilinear nature of that portion of Bray Avenue. Staff also recommended speed limit pavement markings to remind drivers of the speed limit along Bray Avenue.

In December 2020, the City completed the installation of centerline striping on the “S” curve portion of Bray Avenue and also installed “25” speed markings on Bray Avenue to remind drivers of the speed limit (Attachment 3).

DISCUSSION
Since installation of the “S” curve centerline stripe, the Department continues to get requests to reconsider the installation of a centerline stripe along Bray Avenue from Scott Boulevard to Los Padres Boulevard. As summarized in the background section, this requested striping does not meet CAMUTCD guidelines or the NTCP. However, with Council authorization staff can complete the centerline stripe as a Level 1 traffic calming measure.

Possible Alternatives for City Council discussion and consideration: At the request of Council, staff is providing this report for the Council to discuss the possible installation of a centerline stripe along Bray Avenue from Scott Boulevard to Los Padres Boulevard. It is important to note that although the traffic calming study completed in fall 2020 did not warrant the installation of Level 1, 2, or 3 traffic calming measures, traffic patterns and volumes may have changed since late 2020 due to the lifting of past COVID-19 restrictions, although it may be unlikely that the numbers would have increased enough to change the outcome of the study. Staff has not received any requests to redo the study and recent data related to Bray Avenue has not been collected. Below are possible alternatives for Council to consider related to the situation on Bray Avenue. · Direct staff to install centerline striping on Bray Avenue between Scott Boulevard and Los Padres Avenue. Staff estimates the work could be completed by September 2022. · Direct staff to complete an updated traffic calming study for Bray Avenue between Scott Boulevard and Los Padres Avenue based on updated traffic data information. The study would be initiated when school is back in session and it is estimated it could be completed by fall 2022.
· Take no action.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Section 15301(c) Existing Facilities, as the activity consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency’s determination.

City of Santa Clara Page 3 of 4 Printed on 7/8/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-883 Agenda Date: 7/12/2022

FISCAL IMPACT
If Council directs staff to install centerline striping on Bray Avenue from Scott Boulevard to Los Padres Boulevard or complete an updated traffic calming study for Bray Avenue, the cost would be covered under existing budgets.

COORDINATION
This report has been coordinated with the Police Department.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Direct staff to install centerline striping on Bray Avenue between Scott Boulevard and Los Padres Avenue.

2. Direct staff to complete an updated traffic calming study for Bray Avenue between Scott Boulevard and Los Padres Avenue based on updated traffic data information

3. Take no action.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff makes no recommendation.

Reviewed by: Craig Mobeck, Director of Public Works
Approved by: Rajeev Batra, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Bray Avenue Location Map

2. Bray Avenue Study Area

3. “S” Curve Centerline Striping Installation in December 2020 City of Santa Clara Page 4 of 4 Printed on 7/8/2022
powered by Legistar™
Attachment 1, Bray Avenue Overall Area Location Map
Bray Avenue Bray Avenue
Warburton Avenue
Los Padres Boulevard
Scott Boulevard
El Camino Real
San Tomas Expressway
Study Area - - -
Attachment
2, Bray Avenue Study Area
Bray Avenue
Scott Boulevard
Los Padres Boulevard
Study Area
El Camino Real
Attachment 3, “S” Curve Centerline Striping Installation in December 2020 September 2020
Current View Los Padres Boulevard Los Padres Boulevard
New Centerline
Stripe
“25” Markings
Pictures of “S” Curve Centerline Striping Installation
(Looking east towards Bray Avenue from Los Padres Boulevard) (Looking west on Bray Avenue)
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-942 Agenda Date: 7/12/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Response to Councilmember Becker’s Written Request regarding the Recent Appointment of Ron Patrick to the Planning Commission

COUNCIL PILLAR
Enhance Community Engagement and Transparency

BACKGROUND
On July 5, 2022 the Council considered a Council Policy 030 written request submitted by Councilmember Becker to discuss the recent appointment of Ron Patrick to the Planning Commission at a future City Council meeting. The Council considered the petition and voted affirmatively to place this item on the July 12, 2022 Council agenda.

DISCUSSION
The City Attorney has provided a memorandum to the City Council (attached) which provides background information on potential concerns regarding the appointment of Mr. Patrick to the Planning Commission and provides the Council with four possible courses of action:

1. Determine the staff investigation sufficiently provided evidence of irregularities regarding Mr.

Patrick’s residency and take action in accordance with Policy 032.

2. Determine that Mr. Patrick remain as a Planning Commissioner and take no further action.

3. Direct staff to conduct further investigation.

4. If Mr. Patrick is removed, there should be an action to appoint a new Commissioner.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact related to the writing of this report.

COORDINATION
This report was coordinated with the Attorney’s Office.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Determine the staff investigation sufficiently provided evidence of irregularities regarding Mr.

City of Santa Clara Page 1 of 2 Printed on 7/8/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-942 Agenda Date: 7/12/2022
Patrick’s residency and take action in accordance with Policy 032.

2. Determine that Mr. Patrick remain as a Planning Commissioner and take no further action.

3. Direct staff to conduct further investigation.

4. If Mr. Patrick is removed, appoint a new Commissioner.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff has no recommendation
Reviewed by: Andrew Crabtree, Director of Community Development Approved by: Rajeev Batra, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. City Attorney Memorandum 2022-07-07 - Planning Commission Appointment of Mr. Ron Patrick City of Santa Clara Page 2 of 2 Printed on 7/8/2022
powered by Legistar™
City Attorney’s Office
Memorandum
Date: July 7, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
From: James Sanchez, Interim City Attorney
Subject: Planning Commission Appointment of Mr. Ron Patrick This memorandum provides you background on your July 5, 2022 action to place the 030 request on this agenda for possible action.

Background
Mr. Ron Patrick, was appointed by the Council to serve on the Planning Commission at the June 6, 2022 Council meeting. At the request of Councilmember Becker, City staff investigated whether Mr. Patrick was an actual Santa Clara resident, as Mr. Becker remembered that Mr. Patrick was recently living in Mountain View. The City Clerk’s Office verified with the registrar of voters that Mr. Patrick changed his voter registration to a Santa Clara address, 5191 Lafayette Street, on May 3, 2022.

The property Mr. Patrick listed as his residence, 5191 Lafayette, is an industrial building constructed in 1979, and it is also the location of Mr. Patrick’s business. Although this property was previously zoned Light Industrial, in 2018 the City Council rezoned 5191 Lafayette to Transit Neighborhood (TN) as part of the Tasman East Specific Plan.

Multifamily residential uses are a permitted use in the TN zoning. SCCC §

18.25.030(a). That being said, no modifications have been made to the industrial building to convert it to a residential use (such as a kitchen, or a bedroom with a window). In addition, the use of the building for one “dwelling unit” would also not comply with the minimum density for residential units on the site, which is 60 dwelling units per acre. SCCC § 18.25.060(b). The property is 0.51 acres in area, and so a residential development on the site would need a minimum of 31 units in order to comply with the zoning. As such, the use of the property for a single dwelling violates the zoning ordinance.

The Finance Department verified that the property is using City utilities (electric, water), so it is likely occupied in some fashion. However, the establishment of a residential use on the property is also a violation of the California Building Code, as Mr. Patrick has not secured a residential certificate of occupancy. After consulting with the Building Re: Planning Commission Appointment of Mr. Ron Patrick
July 7, 2022

Page 2 ends

City Council and Authorities ConcurrentJuly 12, 2022

City Council and Authorities Concurrent
July 12, 2022