From:
Toi
Subject:
Date:
Hi Debby,
Comment for June 15th planning commission meeting
Friday, June 10, 2022 1:29:05 PM
Post '.\[eetint: '.\bt eri~I
Pfannin g Commii$ioa ;\·letting
6-15-2022
llt lll 2
I'm writing in suppo1t of Tom Quaglia's proposal for the 2 and 3 sto1y townhome project at 3141-3155 El Camino Real (project number
(PLN2020 -14674). Tom's 2 aud 3 sto1y proposal is more sensible for this site than the 4 and 5 sto1y proposals outlined in the Specific Plan, as this site sits directly adjacent to a neighborhood of single family homes. A tall development at this site, as well as the other sites on the North side of El Camino Real will subject adjacent homes to heavy shading and shadows in winter mouths (when sunshine is needed most), and reduced privacy for residents .
Shorter developments are more appropriate for these sites.
Thank.you,
Joseph Penniman
1689 Hood Ct, Santa Clara, CA 95051
From:
To: l!l! c1ez
Post Mectmg Mnt"1"iAl PIAnning
Corumin ,011 M,e1iog
6-15-2022
h=2
Subject: Re: PLN2020-14674 3141-3155 El Camino Real
Monday, June 13, 2022 4:43:35 PM Date:
Hi Debby ,
I might not be able to attend the meeting. May I plea se reque st that this letter be read out loud dmin g the appropriate collllllent time period ?
Regards ,
Linda
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 9, 2022 , at 3:48 PM, Debby Fernandez <DFemande z@santaclarnca .gov> wrot e:
Hello Linda, thank you for your comments. They will be made part of the public record and provided to the Planning Commission and City Council.
Regards,
Debby
From: Linda Zazzara
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2022 2:27 PM
To: Debby Fernandez <[email protected]>
Subject: PLN2020-14674 3141-3155 El Camino Real
Debby Fernandez
Support letter for 3141-3155 El Camino Real PLN2020-
14674
Dear Ms. Fernandez,
Please share this letter with material presented at the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for June 15,
2022.
Usually I actively challenge proposals along the ECR
because they are too tall, too dense and not respectful to neighborhoods. There are some residents in Santa Clara
that do not want any more housing development in our
city. In my opinion that is not practical when so many
people need housing and the State is pushing all cities to increase housing opportunities.
Although we need to add housing, we need to do it
respectfully. This project is adding housing, including below 15% market rate opportunities and I think it is even more exciting that this project has for sale housing. I believe we have been building more rental units than for sale housing. I think we do need additional for sale housing, to give people in the City of Santa Clara the option to either rent or purchase.
In addition, the developer that wants to build this project has had his plans in for quite a while. I believe that it conforms to the existing General Plan. He has engaged, listened to and has the support of the neighbors. This developer has waited long enough. Let him proceed.
It is a sane plan with height and density considerations that respects neighbors. I can only hope that future developers along the ECR and more importantly Planning
Commissioners and City Council members also show the
same respect for current and future residents.
Regards,
Linda Zazzara
Sent from my iPad
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Elizabeth Elliott
Klcao s1oab: Lucy Garcia
FW: Letter of Support for 3141·3155 El Camino Road
Friday, June 17, 2022 9:29:21 AM
3141-3155 El Camino Road · Letter of suooort odf
1maai:001 ona
image003 ong
From: PlanningCommission
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2022 9:28 AM
To: Debby Fernandez
<DFernand [email protected]>
Cc: Reena Brilliot <RBrilli [email protected]>; Lesley Xavier <LXavier@santaclara ca.gov> Subject: FW: Letter of Support for 3141-3155 El Camino Road Good Morning Reed,
Post Meeting Material
Planning Commission Meeting
6/15/22
Item 2
Your letter was received in the Planning Division and by way of this reply I am including the appropr iate staff for thei r information. The item was approved with an unanimous vote at the meeting.
Please note, your correspondence will part of the publ ic record on this Item.
Thank you.
Elizabeth Elliott
Community Development Department I Planning Division
1500 Warburton Avenue I Santa Clara, CA 95050
0: 408.615.2450 I D: 408.615 .2474
WWW SantaCjaraCA ll◊Y
From: Reed Schwartz
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 6:11 PM
To: PlanningCommission <PIAN NINGCOMM ISSION@santadaraca .gov> Subject: Letter of Support for 3141-3155 El Camino Road Hi,
Attached is a letter of support for the project at 3141-3155 El Camino Road.
Thanks!
Reed Schwartz
YIMBY Law Intern
Wesleyan University '24
YIMBYLaw
57 Post St, Suite 908
San Francisco, CA 94104
heHo@yimbylaw org
6/1/2022
Santa Clara Planning Commission
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
[email protected]
Via Email
Re: 3141-3155ElCaminoRoad
Dear Santa Clara Planning Commission,
G
I
I
YIMBY LAW
YIMBY Law is a 501(c)3 non-profit corporation, whose mission is to increase the accessibility and affordability of housing in California. YIMBY Law sues municipalities when they fail to comply with state housing laws, including the Housing Accountability Act (HM). As you know, the Area Planning Commission has an obligation to abide by all relevant state housing laws when evaluating the above captioned proposal, including the HM. Should the City fail to follow the law, YIMBY Law will not hesitate to ensure that the law is enforced.
The applicant proposes to create 60 new units, 40 three-story townhomes and 20 flats, with nine units designated as affordable. The application and approval also include a proposed Zone Change for density from CT to PD.
California Government Code § 65589.51 the Housing Accountability Act, prohibits localities from denying housing development projects that are compliant with the locality's zoning ordinance or general plan at the time the application was deemed complete, unless the locality can make findings that the proposed housing development would be a threat to public health and safety.
The City has erroneously determined that the applicant must submit a request for a rezoning, even though the HAA strictly prohibits local governments from requiring a rezoning when, as here, the general plan and zoning are inconsistent. In this case, the zoning is inconsistent with the general plan; while zoned for commercial use, General Plan policies allow an entirely residential use for sites along El Camino Real.
In 2018 AB 3194 set out to close a loophole that local governments have exploited to avoid cornpliance with the HAA: maintaining low zoning densities to force projects into discretionary rezoning processes. AB 3194 fixed this problem in two ways. First, this bill specifically prohibits local governments from requiring rezoning in cases where the zoning is inconsistent with the general plan. Second, in cases where a local government argues that zoning is consistent with the general plan, the bill requires local governments to facilitate the density allowed under the 1 general plan rather than the zoning. The amendment added Section (j)(4), which states:
For purposes of this section, a proposed housing development project is not inconsistent with the applicable zoning standards and criteria, and shall not require a rezoning, if the housing development project is consistent with the objective general plan standards and criteria but the zoning for the project site is inconsistent with the general plan. If the local agency has complied with paragraph (2), the local agency may require the proposed housing development project to comply with the objective standards and criteria of the zoning which is consistent with the general plan, however, the standards and criteria shall be applied to facilitate and accommodate development at the density allowed on the site by the general plan and proposed by the proposed housing development project. (Emphasis added.) The above captioned proposal is general plan compliant, and must be approved at the density allowed on the site by the general plan and proposed by the housing development project (PD), therefore, your local agency must approve the application regardless of whether a zoning change is granted, or else make findings to the effect that the proposed project would have an adverse impact on public health and safety, as described above. Should the City fail to comply with the law, YIMBY Law will not hesitate to take legal action to ensure that the law is enforced.
I am signing this letter both in my capacity as the Executive Director of YIMBY Law, and as a resident of California who is affected by the shortage of housing in our state.
Sincerely,
Sonja Trauss
Executive Director
YIMBYLaw
YIMBY Law, 57 Post Street, Suite 908 1 San Francisco, CA 94104 2 Debby Fernandez
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject :
Debby Fernandez
Linda Zazzara
Thursday, June 09, 2022 2:27 PM
Debby Fernandez
PLN2020-14674 3141-3155 El Camino Real
Support letter for 3141-3155 El Camino Real PLN2020-14674 Dear Ms. Fernandez ,
Please share this letter with material presented at the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for June 15, 2022.
Usually I actively challenge proposals along the ECR because they are too tall, too dense and not respectful to neighborhoods . There are some residents in Santa Clara that do not want any more housing development in our city. In my opinion that is not practical when so many people need housing and the State is pushing all cities to increase housing opportunities. ,
Although we need to add housing, we need to do it respectfully. This project is adding housing , including below 15% market rate opportunities and I think it is even more exciting that this project has for sale housing. I believe we have been building more rental units than for sale housing. I think we do need additional for sale housing, to give people in the City of Santa Clara the option to either rent or purchase.
In addition , the developer that wants to build this project has had his plans in for quite a while. I believe that it conforms to the existing General Plan. He has engaged, listened to and has the support of the neighbors. This developer has waited long enough. Let him proceed.
It is a sane plan with height and density considerations that respects neighbors. I can only hope that future developers along the ECR and more importantly Planning Commissioners and City Council members also show the same respect for current and future residents.
Regards ,
Linda Zazzara
Sent from my iPad
1 Dear Ms. Fernandez,
My family lives at 2139 Stebbins Ave. Santa Clara, 95051. We heard about the proposed developm ent at the comer of Calabazas Boulevard and El Camino Real. I'm writing this letter to support the proposed project.
As a neighbor and resident oftbe City of Santa Clara, we urge the Planning Commission and City Council to approve the project and bring much needed For-Sale housing to the city and om neighborhood.
The proposed 2 and 3 story For-Sale buildings are sensitive to the neighborhood, complies with the existing General Plan and·will provide a high quality architectural transition to the single family homes surrotmding this critical corner. Not everyone wants to live in 4, 5 aud potentially 6 story rental apartment buildings and this project provides a thoughtful alternative.
We support this project and hope it is approved as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Debby Fernandez
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject :
Dear Ms. Fernandez,
Annie Yuan
Thursday, June 09, 2022 12:06 PM
Debby Fernandez
Santa Clara Residents Opinion on Bowers Plaza Project
We're residents of the City of Santa Clara, personally we support the proposed development at t he corner of Calabazas Boulevard and El Camino Real. But we'd like to urge the Planning Commission and City Council to approve the project and bring much needed For-Sale housing to the city and our neighborhood.
The pro posed 2 and 3 story For-Sale buildings are sensitive to the neighborhood, comply with the existing General Plan andwill provide a high quality architectu ral transition t o the single family homes surroundingthis critical corner. Not everyone wants to live in 4, 5 and potentially 6 story rental apartmen t buildings and this project provides a t houghtf ul alternative. Hope this would be heard and considered I
Thanks!
Lipin & Xinyu
1 Debby Fernandez
From:
Sent :
To:
Subject:
Dear Ms. Fernandez,
Tam, Steven K.
Thursday, June 09, 2022 10:12 AM
Debby Fernandez
Letter of Support PLN2020-1467 - 3141-3155 EL Camino Real Development Proposal I support the proposed developme nt at t he corne r of C:alabazas Boulevard and El Camino Real. I have lived in the City of Santa Clara for over 8 years and suppo rt the development of appropriate for-sale/owne rship housing in t he City. The prop osed 2 and 3 story buildings fit the adjacent neighbor hood and t he high qualit y architectura l on a prom inent corner wil l only enhance the area. This pro ject strikes t he righ t balance between providing 60 units of m uch needed housing whi le respect ing the existing neighbo rhood, and we urge Planning Commissio n and City Council to approve t he project.
Sincere ly,
Steven K. Tam
Counsel
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
[§I (@ in
IT.!! Lowecsteln l.:ii.l Sander
This message contains confidential information, intended only for the person(s) named above, which may also be privileged . Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. In such case, you should delete this message and kindly notify the sender via reply e-mail. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consen t to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind. 1 Debby Fernandez
From: Kent Hillhouse/USA
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2022 3:41 PM
To: Debby Fernandez
Subject: 3141-3155 EL.Camino Real Development Proposal
Debby Ferna ndez
DFerna [email protected]
Subject: Letter of Support PLN2020-1467 - 3141-3155 EL Camino Real Deve lopme nt Proposal Dear Ms. Fernandez,
We support t he proposed development at t he corn er of Calabazas Boulevar d and El Camino Real. We have lived in the City of Santa Clara fo r over seven years and support th e deve lopment of appropriat e fo r-sale/owners hip housing iri the City. The proposed 2 and 3 story buildi ngs fit the adja cent neig hborhood and the high quality architectural on a prom inent corner w ill only enhance the area. This project strikes t he right balance between prov iding 60 units of much needed housing while respecti ng th e existing neighbo rhood, and we urge Planning Comm ission and Cit y Council to approve t he project.
Sincerely,
Kent Hillho use
740 Hil mar Street
Santa Clara, CA 95050
The Information contained in this email (including any attachments) Is confidentia l, may be subject to legal or other professional privilege and contain copyright material,
and is Intended for use by the named recipient(s) only.
Access to or use of this email or its attachments by anyone else is strictly prohibited and_ may be unlawful. If you are not the intend ed recipient(s), you may not use, disclose,
copy or distribute this email or its attachments (or any part thereof), nor t ake or omit to take any action In reliance on it. If you have received this email in error, please notify
the sender immediately by telephone or email and delete it, and all copies thereof, including all attachments, from your system. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived
or lost because this email has been sent to you by mistake.
Although we have taken reasonable precautions to reduce the risk of transmitting software viruses, we accept no liability for any loss or damage caused by this email or its
attachments due to viruses, Interference, Interception, corruption or unapproved access.
Please see our website to view our privacy notice/ statement. 1 Debby Fernandez
From:
Sent :
To:
Subject:
Dear Ms. Fernandez,
Patrick Downey
Tuesday, May 31, 2022 12:32 PM
Debby Fernandez
Letter of Support PLN2020-14674 3141-3155 El Camino Real We support the proposed development at the comer of Calabazas Boulevard and El Camino Real. My family has lived in the City of Santa Clara for over 30 years and as such, we urge the Planning Commission and City Council to approve the project and bring much needed for-sale ownership housing to the City. The proposed 2 and 3 story buildings are sensitive to the neighborhood, comply with the existing General Plan and will provide a high quality architectural transition to the single family homes surrounding this critical comer. Not everyone wants to live in 4, 5 and potentially 6 story rental apartment buildings and this project provides a thoughtful alte1native.
I have many friends who live in these new developments of only 2-3 stories and they know tJ:ieir neighbors and are welcomed by the surrounding community. On the other hand, the friends I know who are in the larger buildings seldom know their neighbors. They often rent from the leasing company and have no pride for the community since they do not own their units. They have high turnover and rarely are able to connect with the people in their building because of the sheer volume. Please decide on the right path forward for the neighbors and support PLN2020-1467 4 3141-3155 El Camino Real .
We support this project and hope it is approved as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Patrick Downey
1 May 13, 2022
Debby Fernandez
Associate Planner
City of Santa Clara Planning Department
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Re: PLN2020-14674
Request for Approval of Project at 3155 El Camino Real
Dear Ms. Fernandez,
As a born and raised Santa Clara resident for over three decades, I am in strong support of the proposed development project at the above referenced address on El Camino Real and Calabazas Blvd. Having grown up around this neighborhood, frequenting the businesses and restaurants, I can say that the project would be a welcome improvement to this part of the El Camino corridor.
There is an urgent need for housing, but a balance is needed to avoid over densification. The buildings proposed meet that balance by maintaining a 2 to 3 story height and a pleasing architectural style. They also provide a great option for affordable for-sale units which would open up more opportunities for home ownership, which has become increasingly difficult in the City of Santa Clara and surrounding areas.
I strongly support this project and urge the Planning Commission to approve as soon as possible.
Thank you,
~
3/n c:vwk 4; :zc
1 o2i
!
lt4:!t;f;~~~
I l5'o6 w~- ~f _
iY~ ~~ 9-5'r>5'o
f ivNJt,~ ~~ '
ed;:j/ rJ7 ~ o' ~ (}ja_)uc_,,-
/ ?°co <f D;:,J"e,1vt··u/~~
~/l"!Vtv' aell~ tu1 C' c2/ f .5(Jj c,
fl.1'7;./ I 4/..vt-10._ J ,,./J,'l/J7.c1 ~C,t1/
~ .. .' Lk-t,,e,t/411.1;;;1,t (g) c.Jlt/ J p/o-;--c!c (!d,4K,v;tJ-- Btnv~ PJ4~,,,
~J rJ,,r,,,,( '---1'>7 '-fa~,L ~ Of1f' ~~
iD, ;iJlld- rfaA-e_~ .,,;c {l,,_,l d ,,_ /p, cJ+k -1_, ~ ¢ ~ ,,c;l._ iA_H,,.··l7h,_.-, \../ 1 ;t;t,J-/) ~ 4,.,a_) 1 {J-?,{,/2_ .._,Y/2.&71~_,,, , ~ CZ{flt_ /4) _,vrvd~/c_ / U L£ -~ cR./2.e_ e,l.-U.~•d~/ ~> ·-n-; a:..7 .~,1r1~ -z ,L u-11- 1,L 0U?v./ jJ/2 ~i/ Cf.-,;,i.,,t':c ~ d--z,0"L.-, , L-rlRA--Y'l/hJ~~ - ·J/2 ruft--r:--~-~ ~ r /l~t_;J/
~ / tJ, f .u0}.L./, c/!~t- ~.e4:Af-'!,J'-J- ,/44- 1 ~n,-,,-,,~~7:a -1.--c~'· j;u,-,:/--i;Lc?eA-4...., ~ •~--l~,_~lc_ 1 c;1/2..,~<-;J- ~ /,1J'i£,a_2 .
1 - tY7l.fl_J {!_. fv)_,, -j2e1- tvh(.,L_; /lJ-/L/!_,,;,t_ ~~ ?0£-?~ ~ ~1/'C. ;Ii<,
1 -i") .2? -;1/4 ~ C--tl1 \/J l~- '7/llY~ , //? t&-1~1- i:1( ~ _,hl?L,,t; (}A,,_, i(h_ ~ 'j t0r-.,fj_, 1 ,£,,_:z- 711Ct,if __J'f~ 2-wv J ,:t;,,uZd ,di?,,.:[]!,, T~, -n, ,,.,v, {];r_,W_,; \,,.-1,·rv1'L \'.. ~ aft-0 ~
a ,,jl. 1 -f'- ✓ ,,M7:<C-' JU! ,,_,,_,, ,,_,, -;t.. L --r'-~f-4'.J-<_ ,il.._ tl_~~ ,11..f.-1~ '-A,,~-t,,., J;u,~,,,., . ,2--- 7 n ~ .--'- ?l, 1,t--;!l ,<1-t-o )c..._ 1 ~ ~~ : ~,.. ,::,,,t,r,,_re.,,_. c,,,..,J.. a·:r
J!).J~ /Ji,.,<l-- . JJ:t:1 ~ ~ !:/,
Debby Fernandez
From:
Sent:
To:
Debby Fernandez
Tuesday, December 08, 2020 4:53 PM
DONALD BEST
Subject: RE: Proposed Development at 3141 - 3155 El Camino Real Hello Donald, thank you for you r comments below and for calling my atten tion to the incorrect email prov ided in the flyer. Your comme nts will be saved to the project file. I will alert the applicant of the error so that all future mailings provide the correct email address. This particular mailing was prov ided by the applicant.
Regards,
Debby
From: DONALD BEST
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2020 4:31 PM
To: Debby Fernandez <[email protected]>
Subject : Proposed Development at 3141 - 3155 El Camino Real Debby,
I am strongly opposed to this project. The city is letting these developers run haywi re all for the all mighty dollar. El Camino is already congest ed enough without adding more problems to the area. When this was all started it was not supposed to take away ret ail space without having a place for it. We are having to drive farthe r and farthe r to shop. I understand progress I work in construction but this is getting ridiculous. Why not tear down the town hall and the fo untain (that doesn't work most of the time) and put it there.
Don Best
Sent from my iPhone
1 Debby Fernandez
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hi Mr Debby Fenandez,
Zhefan Wan
Thursday, October 07, 2021 1 :58 AM
Debby Fernandez
3077-3157 El Camino Real Resident Input
Hope you' re doing well. I'm a 3-year resident of Tuscany Apartmen t s (3229 El Camino Real), across the stree t from the planned developmen t at 3077-3157 El Camino Real. Not sure if you're the best person to reach out to, I wanted to share some concerns about how t his project affects the neighbo rhood's walkability, please let me know if there's someone better to reach out to.
It's my underst anding that the planned development will lead to the demolition of the existing Taj Mahal Imports grocery at 3109 El Camino Real. I wanted to inqui re about whether any upcoming planned developments in the area include a replacement Asian grocery, and if not, express my concern at how Taj Maha l's demolition eliminates the wal kability of the neighborh ood.
I personally chose Tuscany apartments in part because of its closeness to nearby groceries, allow ing me to buy cooking ingredients daily without use of a car or public transit. There are no other groceries within <15 min ute walk of Tuscany apartments with fre sh produce. Lucky and Han Kook are ove r 15 minutes walk to the west and requir e crossing the pedestri an-unfrien dly Lawrence Expressway underpass, while Target is almost 30 minutes walk to the east. Target and Lucky, furt hermore, are car-oriented and require passing uncomfortably large parking lots. It is extreme ly rare to have a small "neighbor hood grocery" feeling in the south bay, and I can say very confidently that such an ame nity has attracted me and other professio nals to live in the neighborhood.
I'll also add, a large portion ofTuscany residents are of interna ti onal origin and need an Indian grocery for their daily shoppi ng needs, and the next closest Indian grocery is even further, 25 minutes, to the West.
I totally support increased high-density development along the El Camino corridor , but I hope this will not be at the expense of the groceries and restaurants that enable this neighborhood to be walkable. I am concerned that future housing developmen t without walkable amenities will be counterp rodu ctive to both residents' and city's goals for the neighborhood .
Thank you for reading, I really care about this neighborhood and am eager for opportu nities like this to cont ribut e to it s development.
Zhefan Wang
1 Letter To The Planning Commission
(From Bowers Plaza Tenants. Address: 3075--3157 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95051)
September 17, 2021
Dear Planning Commission of city of Santa Clara
Please accept my humble respects. I, Miten Patel, am writing this letter on behalf of all the "Bowers Plaza Tenants." I am the managei· and family member of Pani Puri Company located at above mentioned address.
First, we are writing to you as you are the first body of city committee that we were directed to by the project planner of the above address mentioned , We are requesting to delay the housing development project that is planned at the above mentioned address up to the year of 2023, along with some transitional support.
Transitional support is needed so the businesses that operate in Santa Clara are not lost. The livelihood of the employees that work at these establishment are not tarnished. The City of Santa Clara must adopt or develop a transitional agenda to help businesses, so there won't be any grudge towards the city and city members.
In such way work can flow flawlessly, in other words, all of the parties involved benefits! Or option two: If the council members votes to approve this project and if the tenants have to vacate the building, then at the least, ·we ask for is 12 months minimum of stay after the housing development project is approved. First reason for this is, there are five restaurants at this plaza, and it would take almost one year to build another facility for each ofus, as the planning and permitting process is lengthy and time consuming by the city of Santa Clara. And it would take even more resources, to redirect our current customer base to a new location. This request will give us time to relocate. Second, we cannot start the process of building another facility for ourselves because if the city does not approve the project then we would be either, stuck with two facility or may lose one of the investment unnecessarily. This is on top of the hardship that we are continually facing during these difficulties due to the pandemic, hyper inflation, and labor shortages. We all can understand and argue that this is a reasonab le plea.
Secondly, we are the families and citizens of Santa Clara . Some ofus have been citizens of Santa Clara for over 30 years. And some of the businesses at bowers plaza have been in commiss ion for over 25 years . Furthermore, we engage in other welfare activities such as: Books distribution, charity for autistic and disadvantage children's, to name a few. We cannot just give up everything because a developer wants to build a project and make money at the cost of others ruination or lively hood. Nor has the developers performed a single sacrifice for the city or the community. We need a justifiab le process. What good is prosperity if the citizens are not happy? All of the parties should benefit! Moreover, the tenants of bowers plaza have been contributing to the city tax revenue through their hard work and money which benefits the city and the community. It is the tenants of this property that have been maintaining the property through their hard eamed money and also, engaging innumerable other businesses on maintaining this property. So, technically the tenants are the upholders of this property and partially this community, even though the re is a separate owner. Toe tenants have invested large sum of capital through their hard earn services, so we should not lose that for the benefits of others.
Lastly, we ask that you take this matter very seriously, just like any other grave situation that you may have faced in your life time, but were denied of your sincere plea or request. All executives are great leaders and they have a great responsib ility to uphold. The decision you make will not only affect the tenants but the whole community as well as your own humb le self. Tiris is the time for you to justify what should be the correct decision.
Sincere ly Yours