Cities Index.
Responses to Comments received on the Mitigated Negative Declaration

City Council and Authorities Concurrent
July 12, 2022

Document
Responses to Comments received on the Mitigated Negative Declaration
Meeting
July 12, 2022
Body
City Council and Authorities Concurrent
Pages
3
Original file
7.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santaclara.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

3155 EL CAMINO REAL RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS

The 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared and evaluated in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The IS/MND was circulated for 30 days from February 14 to March 15, 2022. The City received two comment letters during the public comment period:

Comment Letters Received by the City from State, County, or Local agencies:

A. California Department of Transportation March 14, 2022 B. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority March 15, 2022

This memo responses to public comments on the IS/MND as they relate to the potential environmental impacts of the project under CEQA. Numbered responses correspond to comments in each comment letter. Copies of all comment letters are attached.

Comment Letter A: California Depart ment of Transportation (Caltrans) – March 14, 2022

Comment A-1: The project is located directly along State Route (SR)-85 in Santa Clara. The project proposes to construct eight residential buildings containing a total of 60 residential units. The buildings would range from two to three stories with a height of approximately 34 to 40 feet. The project would also include 110 parking spaces.

Response A-1: Caltrans has correctly summarized the project as presented in the IS/MND.

Comment A-2: The project VMT analysis and significance determination are undertaken in a manner consistent with the Office of Planning and Research’s (OPR) Technical Advisory. Per the IS/MND, this project is found to have a less than significant VMT impact, therefore working towards meeting the State’s VMT reduction goals.

Response A-2: Caltrans has correctly interpreted the VMT analysis presented in the IS/MND.

Comment A-3: Potential impacts to the State Right-of-Way (ROW) from project-related temporary access points should be analyzed. Mitigation for significant impacts due to construction and noise should be identified. Project work that requires movement of oversized or excessive load vehicles on State roadways requires a transportation permit that is issued by Caltrans. To apply, visit:
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/transportation-permits. Prior to construction, coordination may be required with Caltrans to develop a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) to reduce construction traffic impacts to the State Transportation Network (STN).

Response A-3: The proposed project has analyzed the Air Quality, Noise, and Hazards impacts of the proposed project including improvements associated with the removal of the “porkchop” within the State ROW. These impacts were found to be less than significant, or were mitigated to a less than significant level with the incorporation of measures as identified in sections 4.3, 4.9, and 4.13 of the IS/MND. The proposed project would acquire all necessary permits from Caltrans to complete construction. Additionally, the proposed project would coordinate with Caltrans on the development of a TMP to reduce any impacts on the STN.

Comment A-4: As the Lead Agency, the City of Santa Clara is responsible for all project mitigation, including any needed improvements to the State Transportation Network (STN). The project’s fair share contribution, financing, scheduling, implementation responsibilities and lead agency monitoring should be fully discussed for all proposed mitigation measures.

Response A-4: The analysis did not identify any impacts to the State ROW. Therefore, there is no nexus to require transportation mitigation for the project.

Comment A-5: If any Caltrans facilities are impacted by the project, those facilities must meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards after project completion. As well, the project must maintain bicycle and pedestrian access during construction. These access considerations support Caltrans’ equity mission to provide a safe, sustainable, and equitable transportation network for all users.

Response A-5: The proposed project will comply with state and local regulations for ADA accessibility and will maintain access to pedestrian and bicycle access during construction.

Comment A-6: Please be advised that any permanent work or temporary traffic control that encroaches onto Caltrans’ ROW requires a Caltrans-issued encroachment permit. As part of the encroachment permit submittal process, you may be asked by the Office of Encroachment Permits to submit a completed encroachment permit application package, digital set of plans clearly delineating Caltrans’ ROW, digital copy of signed, dated and stamped (include stamp expiration date) traffic control plans, this comment letter, your response to the comment letter, and where applicable, the following items: new or amended Maintenance Agreement (MA), approved Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD), approved encroachment exception request, and/or airspace lease agreement. Your application package may be emailed to [email protected].

Please note that Caltrans is in the process of implementing an online, automated, and milestone- based Caltrans Encroachment Permit System (CEPS) to replace the current permit application submittal process with a fully electronic system, including online payments. The new system is expected to be available during 2022. To obtain information about the most current encroachment permit process and to download the permit application, please visit https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/ep/applications.

Response A-6: The proposed project would require encroachment into the Caltrans ROW and would therefore require a Caltrans encroachment permit. The developer would provide the required permit information prior to construction and would coordinate with Caltrans on the requirements of the permit.

Comment Letter B: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority – March 15, 2022

Comment B-1: VTA appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project. VTA has reviewed the document and has the following comments:

Central Bikeway Integration
VTA has worked closely with City of Santa Clara staff to plan for a future high quality, low stress bikeway that is complimentary of the City of Santa Clara Council Adopted Bicycle Master Plan vision for El Camino Real. Central Bikeways builds on the idea of protected bikeway and enhances it, with a sidewalk level bikeway, permanent protected barrier, enhanced landscaping, lighting upgrades, wayfinding, and improved protected intersections. While still in the conceptual planning stage, it is important to not preclude or increase costs for the future bikeway as properties redevelop along this important corridor. Please visit www.vta.org/centralbikeway for more details.

VTA commends the project for removing curb cuts along El Camino Real. Doing so reduces the amount of conflict points for pedestrians and bicycle and enhances the experience on this section of El Camino Real. VTA strongly recommends the following modifications to the site plan to better integrate with the future Central Bikeway:
x Maintain only eight-foot width maximum of sidewalk along the El Camino Real frontage.

The project states it will build a 10.5-foot sidewalk, although it unclear from the site plan how much is on private property and how much is in the public right of way. Extending the sidewalk beyond eight feet in the public right of way could conflict with the future bikeway and require additional work or cost to rebuild the sidewalk in the future (see Attachment A).

However, if the project intends to build some of the proposed 10.5-foot sidewalk on private property, VTA supports this plan.
x Potentially minimize the use of trees along the four-foot planted strip. Relocation or removal of this trees would likely occur I the future when the bikeway is constructed. x Provide a fair share contribution towards the future reconstruction of the Calabazas Boulevard protected intersection improvements identified in the Central Bikeway Basis of Design Plans (see attachment A). VTA strongly supports this project removing the free right- hand turn (porkchop) from El Camino Real to Calabazas Boulevard. This goes a long way towards creating a safer city for all users.
x Require any light poles along El Camino Real to also include additional pedestrian-scale lighting to compliment the future bikeway.

We recognize some of these changes may be counterintuitive to the current design and vision of wider sidewalks and a planted buffer common along El Camino Real.

Response B-1: The VTA’s support of the project is acknowledged. VTA’s recommendations regarding sidewalk width, fair share contribution, lighting, and tree planting will be taken under consideration by the decision-making bodies. Additionally, the proposed project would expand the sidewalk into the project site and would not take up additional right of way on the street side of the sidewalk. The proposed project would comply with the policies, guidelines and regulations of the decision-making body regarding the project design features.
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” DISTRICT 4

OFFICE OF TRANSIT AND COMMUNITY PLANNING
P.O. BOX 23660, MS–10D | OAKLAND, CA 94623-0660
www.dot.ca.gov
March 14, 2022 SCH #: 2022020290
GTS #: 04-SCL-2022-01020
GTS ID: 25578
Co/Rt/Pm: SCL/82/13.65
Debby Fernandez, Associate Planner
City of Santa Clara
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050

Re: 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) Dear Debby Fernandez:

Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the environmental review process for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project. We are committed to ensuring that impacts to the State’s multimodal transportation system and to our natural environment are identified and mitigated to support a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system. The following comments are based on our review of the February 2022 MND.

Project Understanding
The project is located directly along State Route (SR)-85 in Santa Clara. The project proposes to construct eight residential buildings containing a total of 60 residential units. The buildings would range from two to three stories with a height of approximately 34 to 40 feet. The project would also include 110 parking spaces.

Travel Demand Analysis
The project VMT analysis and significance determination are undertaken in a manner consistent with the Office of Planning and Research’s (OPR) Technical Advisory. Per the IS/MND, this project is found to have a less than significant VMT impact, therefore working towards meeting the State’s VMT reduction goals.

Construction-Related Impacts
Potential impacts to the State Right-of-Way (ROW) from project-related temporary access points should be analyzed. Mitigation for significant impacts due to construction and noise should be identified. Project work that requires movement of oversized or excessive load vehicles on State roadways requires a transportation

CA LIFO RNIA STATE TR ANS PORTATION AG ENCY GAV IN NEWSOM , GOV ERNOR California Department of Transportation
• • lb/trans ·
Debby Fernandez, Associate Planner
March 14, 2022

Page 2 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” permit that is issued by Caltrans. To apply, visit: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic- operations/transportation-permits. Prior to construction, coordination may be required with Caltrans to develop a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) to reduce construction traffic impacts to the STN.

Lead Agency
As the Lead Agency, the City of Santa Clara is responsible for all project mitigation, including any needed improvements to the State Transportation Network (STN). The project’s fair share contribution, financing, scheduling, implementation responsibilities and lead agency monitoring should be fully discussed for all proposed mitigation measures.

Equitable Access
If any Caltrans facilities are impacted by the project, those facilities must meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards after project completion. As well, the project must maintain bicycle and pedestrian access during construction. These access considerations support Caltrans’ equity mission to provide a safe, sustainable, and equitable transportation network for all users.

Encroachment Permit
Please be advised that any permanent work or temporary traffic control that encroaches onto Caltrans’ ROW requires a Caltrans-issued encroachment permit. As part of the encroachment permit submittal process, you may be asked by the Office of Encroachment Permits to submit a completed encroachment permit application package, digital set of plans clearly delineating Caltrans’ ROW, digital copy of signed, dated and stamped (include stamp expiration date) traffic control plans, this comment letter, your response to the comment letter, and where applicable, the following items: new or amended Maintenance Agreement (MA), approved Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD), approved encroachment exception request, and/or airspace lease agreement. Your application package may be emailed to [email protected].

Please note that Caltrans is in the process of implementing an online, automated, and milestone-based Caltrans Encroachment Permit System (CEPS) to replace the current permit application submittal process with a fully electronic system, including online payments. The new system is expected to be available during 2022. To obtain information about the most current encroachment permit process and to download the permit application, please visit https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic- operations/ep/applications.

Debby Fernandez, Associate Planner
March 14, 2022

Page 3 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” Thank you again for including Caltrans in the environmental review process. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, or for future notifications and requests for review of new projects, please email [email protected].

Sincerely,

MARK LEONG
District Branch Chief
Local Development Review
c: State Clearinghouse

x
x
x
x
~
anta Clara Valley
Transportation
Authority
March 15, 2022
City of Santa Clara
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Attn. Debby Fernandez, Associate Planner
By Email [email protected]
Dear Debby,
VTA appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study for the 3155 El Camino Real Residential Project VTA has reviewed the document and has the following comments:

Central Bikeway Integration
VTA has worked very closely with City of Santa Clara staff to plan for a future high quality, low-stress bikeway that is comp limentary of the City of Santa Clara Counci l Adopted Bicycle Master Plan vision for El Camino Real. Central Bikeway builds on the idea of protected bikeway and enhances it, with a sidewalk level bikeway, permanent protected barrier, enhanced landscap ing, lighting upgrad es, wayfinding, and improved protected intersections. While still in the conceptual planning stage, it is imp ortant to not preclude or increase costs for the future bikeway as properties redevelop along this imp ortant corridor. Please visit www.v ta.org/ centra lbikeway for more details.

VTA commends the project for removing curb cuts along El Cam ino Real. Doing so, reduces the amount of confl ict points for pedestrians and bicyclists and enhances the experience on this section of El Camino Real. VTA strongly recommends the following modifications to the site plan to better integrate with the future Central Bikeway
Maintain only eight-foot width maximum of sidewalk along the El Camino Real frontage. The project states it will build a 10.5-foot sidewa lk, although it unclear from the site plan how much is on private property and how much is in the public right of way. Extending the sidewalk beyond eight feet in the public right of way cou ld conf lict with the future bikeway and require additional work or cost to rebuild the sidewa lk in the future (see Attachment A). However, if the project intends to build some of the proposed 105-foot sidewa lk on private property, VT A supports this plan.

Potentially minimize the use of trees along the four-foot planted strip. Relocation or removal of this trees wou ld likely occur in the future when the bikeway is constructed.

Provide a fair-share con tributi on towards the future reconstruction of the Calabazas Boulevard protected intersection improvements ident ified in the Central Bikeway Basis of Design Plans (see Attachment A). VTA strong ly supports this project removing the free right-hand turn (porkchop) from El Cam ino Real to Calabazas Boulevard. This goes a long way towards creat ing a safer city for all users.

Require any light poles along El Camino Real to also includ e additional pedestrian-scale lighting to compliment the future bikeway.
3331 North First Street
San Jose, CA 95134-1927
Administration 408-321-5555
Customer Service 408-321-2300 Solutions that move you

City of Sa n Jose
3155 El Camin o Real Residentia l Project

Page 2 of 2 ends

We reco gnize that some of these changes may be co unterintui tive to the current design and vision of wider sidewalks and a planted buffer co mm on along El Camino Real.

Thank yo u again for the opportunit y to review this project If yo u have any questions, please do not hesitate to co ntact me at 408-32 1-5830 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Lola Torney
Transportation Planner Ill
SC2203









(/&$0,125($/
&$/$%$=$6
%/9'
&$/$%$=$6
%/9'

$$$
'
21(:::::$<$$<5$$<$<$<$<<<< 5$,6(',6('6
6(36(3$5$77('7('%,%%,%,.(:(:$<$<
******


6666,'(:$/'(:$/..
5('8&5(555('8&7,217

















































































3523235232
6('3('3
527(&527(&527
7('7('
,1,17(5
(5
6(&7,6
&7,
2216
3(&,$
/,=('
75($7775
($7($7
000(17
1717
0$<0$<%0$<
(1(((1((
('(''('
)25%25
,.(:$,.(:$,.(:$
<$/2<$/2<$ / 2
1*1**
&$/$%&$/$&$
/$%
$=$6$=$6=$6
%/9'%/9'%/9'/9












$$$$
''


































)2&
&
2 


52:
:
2 


)2&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
)



52:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
5 



***

772727272222
72277727277277272722
























6,'(:$/.
5('8&7,21


$5$57,&57,&7,&
&8/$7(88/$7(8/$7(
((''
%86%8686886
$57,&$57,&557575
8/$7(8/$7(8//$7(
7(
''''
88 88
88 %86%8%%%8
888
888
((//(///
&$0&$0&$0&$0&$0
,12,112222
5(5(5(5(($$/$/$/$//
$/3$/3,1(,1($9$9((
'
$$$$$
21(:21(212 $<5$<5$<5$5$,,6,6('('
6(6(3$56(36(3(3$5$7('$ %,.(:%,.(:%,.(%,.(:$<$<
3523235232
32 6('66
,17(517(5
6(&7(&7,&7
2111
02',)02',)02',)
,&$7,,&$7,&
7,
212121










































)2&
2 &


52:
2 :


)2&
)


52:
2 

































































)520)520)520)52)520520520

)520)520)5520520525205525222220

















352-(&712

'(6,*1('%<

'5$:1%<

5(9,(:('%<

'$7(

6&$/(

',$/72//)5((

$7/($677:2:25.,1*'$<6
%()25(<28',*
8QGHUJURXQG6HUYLFH$OHUW
6+((7 2)
6+((7126+((77,7/(
0$5. '( 6&5,37,21
,668(
'$7( ,17,$/
WK6WUHHW6XLWH$_2DNODQG&$

_DOWDJRFRP
'ZJILOHQDPH
6
?3URMHFWV??3:?3/27'5$:,1*6?6,GZJ/DVWVDYHGE\ PYHUDFUX]3ORWGDWH

303ORWVW\OHWDEOH
$/7$1&66WDQGDUGVWE
0$&
::
09&



2DNODQG5RDG 6DQ-RVH&$


6$17$&/$5$97$
&(175$/%,.(:$<
352-(&7
167675((7
6$1-26(&$


6&$/( 3/$16&$/( )((7
  
0$7&+/,1(6(($%29(
0$7&+/,1(6((%(/2:
0$7&+/,1(6((6+((76,
0$7&+/,1(6((6+((76,
6,
6DQWD&ODUD9DOOH\
&HQWUDO%LNHZD\3URMHFW

&255,'25&21&(376
(/&$0,125($/
21(:$<6,'(:$/./(9(/
6(3$5$7('%,.(:$<
127(

5,*+77851621$5('6,*1$/3+$6(6+$//%(
5(675,&7('
AVM1Nl8 1VH1NJ3
!iii-ii
►
0 "
•

← All documents from this meeting