Resolution No. 22-9139 — City Council and Authorities Concurrent, August 30, 2022 (part 1 of 4)

RESOLUTION NO. 22-9139

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA

ADOPTING THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA PRUNERIDGE

AVENUE COMPLETE STREETS PLAN
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, in 2019, the City received a Caltrans Sustainable Communities grant totaling $351,077 to prepare the Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan (the "Plan"); WHEREAS, after release of a Request for Proposal, the City Council approved retaining Alta Planning + Design to assist with development of the Plan; WHEREAS, the development of the Plan has been over the past 21 months through a collaborative effort involving the public, various stakeholders, the Santa Clara Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, the Santa Clara Senior Advisory Commission, the Santa Clara Parks and Recreation Commission, and the Santa Clara Youth Commission; WHEREAS, the Plan identifies concepts for infrastructure improvements designed to encourage bicycling and walking as a safe and healthy alternative to the motor vehicle; WHEREAS, the City conducted significant community outreach to understand the issues and obtain feedback on concept alternatives, and this outreach consisted of seven community meetings, two pop-up events, one City Council study session, City Council briefings, three online surveys, social media, 20 street signs posted along the corridor, 23,238 mailed notices, a project website, a project email address, a project phone number, and City website; WHEREAS, the Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Santa Clara Complete Streets Policy, Bicycle Plan Update 2018, 2019 Pedestrian Master Plan, and the mobility and transportation element of the 2010-2035 General Plan; WHEREAS, at its June 27, 2022 meeting, the Santa Clara Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee recommended City Council approve the Plan; and, WHEREAS, the adoption of the Plan is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to Section 15262 of the California Public Resources Code.

Resolution/Adopting the City of Santa Clara Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan Rev: 11/22/17

Page 1 of 2 ends

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the City of Santa Clara hereby adopts the Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan as attached and referenced herein.

2. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED

AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCILORS:

NOES: COUNCILORS:

ABSENT : COUNCILORS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS :

Attachments incorporated by reference:

1. Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan
Becker, Hardy, Jain, and Park
Watanabe
Chahal
MayorGillmo ~
ATTEST:
~MC

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA
Resolution/Adopting the City of Santa Clara Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan Page 2 of2 Rev: 11 /22/17 ,
Prepared by
Alta Planning + Design
City of Santa Clara
Pruneridge Complete
Streets Plan
July 2022
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD City Council
Lisa M. Gillmor
0D
\RU
Kathy Watanabe
'LVWULFW
Raj Chahal
'LVWULFW
Karen Hardy
'LVWULFW
Kevin Park
'LVWULFW
Sudhanshu “Suds” Jain
'LVWULFW
9LFH0D\RU
Anthony Becker
'LVWULFW
&LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD6WDႇ
Craig Mobeck
'LUHF
WRURI3XEOLF:RUNV
Michael Liw
$VVLVWDQW3XEOLF:RUNV'LUHFWRU
Jonathan Yee
7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ0DQDJHU
Carol Shariat
3URMHFW0DQDJHU
3ULQFLSDO7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ3ODQQHU
Stakeholders
6DQWD&ODUD8QL¿HG6FKRRO'LVWULFW
(C
USD)
The Old Quad Residents Association
Santa Clara County Public Health
Department (SCCPHD)
Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition (SVBC)
Apple
Boards and Committees
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Co
mmission
Senior Advisory Commission
Parks and Recreation Commission
Youth Commission
Consultant Team
Alta Planning + Design
He
xagon Transportation Consultants
Funding Provided by Caltrans
7KLVVWXG\ZRXOGQRWKDYHEHHQSRVVLEOH
ZLWKRX
WWKHJHQHURXVIXQGLQJSURYLGHGE\
WKH&DOWUDQV6XVWDLQDEOH7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ
3ODQQLQJ*UDQW3URJUDP
Acknowledgments
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD Table of Contents
Introduction and Background ......................... 4 Existing Conditions .......................................... 9 Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts.......16
'HVLJQ&RQFHSW$QDO\VLV)LQGLQJV
Community Engagement ............................... 45 Implementation ............................................... 61 &RVW%DVHG$OWHUQDWLYHV )XQGLQJ2SWLRQV Appendices ..................................................... 66 $ :RUNLQJ3DSHUV
([LVWLQJ&RQGLWLRQV0HPR
3DUNLQJ8WLOL]DWLRQ0HPR
)XWXUH9ROXPH)RUHFDVWV
7UDႈF$QDO\VLV0HPR
% 6XUYH\5HVXOWV
& 3XEOLF2XWUHDFK0DWHULDOV
' &ROOLVLRQ'DWD
Introduction
and Background

01. 3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

01. Introductionand Background
Study Overview
The City of Santa Clara obtained a Sustainable
Transportation Planning grant from Caltrans
to conduct the Pruneridge Complete Streets
Plan (“Plan”), intended to study a 2.2 mile
section of Pruneridge Avenue between
Pomeroy Avenue and Winchester Boulevard
for possible complete streets improvements to
improve multi-modal transportation options
(i.e. bike, ped) for residents and others, as
shown in Map 1. This grant is intended to help
improve pedestrian and bicycle connections,
safety, and accessibility across California.

The project began in December 2020 and sought
to gain a deeper understanding of the potential
EHQH¿WVDQGWUDGHRɣVWRFUHDWLQJD³&RPSOHWH
Street.” A Complete Street is a roadway which
provides safe and convenient travel along
and across the street for all users, including
pedestrians, bicyclists, persons with disabilities,
motorists, movers of commercial goods, users
and operators of public transportation, seniors,
children, youth, and families. Complete Streets
design concepts are intended to improve
bicycling and walking while addressing
existing issues and concerns from residents.

The Plan was developed through extensive
outreach with local residents and stakeholders,
including one-on-one interviews, seven
community meetings, and several online
surveys. Community priorities for the corridor
were established through interactive polling at
public workshops, and multiple online surveys.

These priorities helped guide the development
and evaluation of potential roadway concepts
and acted as a lens to evaluate concept designs.

Study Corridor
!!
!!!!
!!
!! !! Study Area Boundary
City Boundary
Parks
School
Existing Bike Facilities
Class I
Class II
Class III
Class IV
Map 1. Study Area
The project evaluated multiple years of collision
data along the Pruneridge Avenue corridor and
surrounding neighborhood to identify high
collision locations and incorporate potential
safety enhancements into concept designs. Each
concept design as well as the existing roadway
FRQ¿JXUDWLRQZHUHHYDOXDWHGIRUWKHLULPSDFW
RQWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQVWKURXJKDGHWDLOHGFRUULGRU
transportation analysis of 25 intersections
along Pruneridge Avenue and parallel roads
surrounding the Pruneridge Avenue corridor. In
DGGLWLRQWRWUDɤFFKDQJHVWKHSURMHFWHYDOXDWHG
changes to vehicle congestion, corridor travel
times, and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).

Results from the data-driven analysis are
summarized in this Plan with full memoranda
and methodologies included as Appendices.

The City Council will consider design options
and decide the best path forward given the
FROOHFWHGFRPPXQLW\LQSXWDQGDQDO\VLV¿QGLQJV
>a..
)(
w
w
0 z w
·- ~ ' -' ··· · ······ 3:-.;:,
.J !
>-0 tr w
~
0 a..
"
.,.,_""'"_
~ p-~
C-JP.n ,__ ,,,,..
..... l:!~.E!T_~e>_R_~ ---- .;.._.s_ru ... o_v._. ... A..,R'--E.A"" .. +""-'-'-''-'-'-':.C..C..~~~ "~

STEVENS CREEK BLVD
-i•--•••"'•••••••- ~--m~...., ,_ <.,..; • >
-

MOORPARK AVE
Q.
)(
w
"' .;:
~
0 ...
z .;:
"'
0 ~ m
\:
0 0
"'
z
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

01. Introductionand Background
Pruneridge Avenue
(Tantau to Pomeroy)
W. Hedding Street
(East of Winchester Boulevard)*
Corridor Context
Study Area overview
The study evaluates a 2.2 mile section
of Pruneridge Avenue with neighboring
city connections including W. Hedding
in San Jose and Apple Park in Cupertino.

Pruneridge Avenue is a minor arterial road
with a posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Neighboring segments
The length of the study area along Pruneridge
Avenue extends from Pomeroy Avenue to the
west to Winchester Boulevard to the east.

Pruneridge Avenue to the west of Pomeroy
underwent a roadway reallocation redesign from
four to two lanes in 2012, and the City of San
Jose completed a similar roadway reallocation
on W. Hedding Street to the east of Winchester
Blvd in 2017. The redesigns were done to
accommodate dedicated bicycle facilities, reduce
vehicle speeds, and improve safety. Pruneridge
Avenue changes names to W. Hedding Street
at Winchester Boulevard – the border between
City of Santa Clara and San Jose. A 2013 City
RI6DQWD&ODUDWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQVVWXG\VKRZHG
that the section west of Pomeroy Avenue
*Located in the City of San Jose
TXDGUXSOHGZHHNGD\ELF\FOHWUDɤFDQGUHGXFHG
ZHHNGD\FDUWUDɤFE\SHUFHQWIROORZLQJWKH
redesign. This section of Pruneridge also had
a 15% reduction in total collisions compared
WRWKHSULRUFRQ¿JXUDWLRQ$&LW\RI6DQ
Jose collision analysis on the segment of W.

Hedding east of Winchester Boulevard following
WKHUHGHVLJQLGHQWL¿HGDUHGXFWLRQLQWRWDO
FROOLVLRQVFRPSDUHGWRWKHSULRUFRQ¿JXUDWLRQ
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

01. Introductionand Background
237
87 82
280
880
Central
Park
Guadalupe
River Park
Twin Creeks
Sport
Complex Sunnyvale
Baylands Park
Guadalupe River
Calabazas Creek
Saratoga Creek
Coyote CreekLevi’s
Stadium
3DWULFN
+HQU\
6FKRRO
.DLVHU
3HUPDQHQWH
6DQWD&ODUD
0HGLFDO
&HQWHU
&XUWLV
6FKRRO
6DQWD&ODUD
+LJK6FKRRO
0LVVLRQ
&ROOHJH
$GULDQ
:LOFR[
+LJK
6FKRRO
&DEULOOR
0LGGOH
6FKRRO
+HUEHUW
+RRYHU0LGGOH
6FKRRO
6DQWD
&ODUD
8QLYHUVLW\
:LOVRQ
+LJK6FKRRO
$EUDKDP
/LQFROQ
+LJK6FKRRO
3HWHUVRQ
0LGGOH
6FKRRO
67(9(16&5((.%/9'
/$85(/:
22'
&(175$/(;3<
:$6+,1*72167
&521,1'5
+23('5
3$5.$9(
+20
(67($'
5'
0$5.(767
%(//20<67
&$/$%$=$6
%/9'
)25%(6$9(
.,)(55'
+$55,62167
6$5$72*$$9(
7$60$1'5
:$/6+$9(
.,(/<%/9'
/$:5(1&((;3<
%2:(56$9(
6&277%/9'
02152(67
(/&$0,125($/
/$)$<(77(67
323/$567
&2/(0$1
$9(
/$)$<(77(67
*$55,7<:$<
6$1720$6(;3<
&(175$/(;3<
&+520,7('5
02152(67
6&277%/9'
:,1&+(67(5%/9'
&$%5,//2$9(
*8$'$/83(5,9(575$,/
%$</$1'63$5.75$,/
6$17$&/$5$67
%(172167
0$57,1$9(
$/'2$9(
67$56$1'675,3(6'5
'(/$&58=%/9'
%$66(7767
0$57,1$9(
0 $85,&,$$9(
)2
5(67$9(
&$/$%$=$6&5((.75$,/
$*$7('5
$0
(7+<67'5
6&277%/9'
$8*86
7,
1('5
0,66,21&2
//(*
(%/9'
320(52<
%5
2 2.'
$/('
5 +$59$5'$9(
/$:5(1&((;3<
3581(5,'*
($9(
6$1720$6$48,12&5((.75$,/
2/'0719,(:
$/9,
62
5'
*5($7$0(5,&$3.:<
/$.(6+25('5
$*
1(:
5'
/,&.0,//%/9'
:
$5%85721$9(
/263$'5(6%/9'
021
7$*8
((;3
<
237
87 280
880
GuadalupeG alupepeuadaGuGuadaad
River Parker Parer Par PaRiveRiveRiv
reeTwin Creereeks
SportSp
ComComplComplexC Sunnyvale
Baylands Park
Guadalupe RiverGuadalupe RiverGuGuGGuGuuuuuGuuuadalupe RiverGuGuu Coyote CreekCoyote Creek
FN3DWUL NF
U\+HQUU
RRO6FKRR O
+H+HUEHUW+HHH+++HU
+RRYHU0LGGOH+RRYHU0+RR 0LGGOHLGL GGRRYRRY+++++ HOHHHHHOHHHHHH 6FKRRORR6FKRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR6FKFFF6
$EUDKDP$EUDKDP$$EE$E$$$ PDPPPEEE
/LQ/LQFROQ/
6FKRRO+LJK6FKRRRO6F6F
3HWHUVRQ3HWHUVRQQVRQQ3 QQQQQQ
00LGGOH
66FKRRO
&(175$/(;3<&(1&&
(;3<
1&+(67(5%/9'+ '5( 9%1
*8$'$/83(5,9(575$,/*8$
(
$/
9 838
57 /83/838
9(59 5
(((5 , 9(
9 (((
%$</$1'63$5.75
3$
75$,/575
63
5555
222222/////'''''''
071 907100719
Calabazas Creek, Saratoga Creek, and Hetch
Hetchy Trails are being analyzed separately
under the Creek Trails Master Plan project
Destinations + Boundaries
6RXUFH
&LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD&DOWUDQV86&HQVXV(65,97$0D SSURGXFHG0DUFK City Hall
Train Station
Light Rail Station
USPS Office
Sport Stadium
Santa Clara Bicycle
Plan Update 2018
Recommended & Existing Bikeways
School
Hospital
Park
00 .51
MILES
Class I Shared-Use Path
Class II Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Buffered Bicycle Lane
Class III Bicycle Route
Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard
Class IV Separated Bikeway
Recommended BikewaysExisting Bikeways
Bridge or
Undercrossing
Class I Shared-
Use Path
Class II Bicycle
Lane
Class III Bicycle
Route
City Bike Plan
Adopted Santa Clara
Plans and Policies
Both the City of Santa Clara and the SCVTA
have adopted plans which highlight the need for
bicycle facilities on Pruneridge Avenue. Adopted
plans recommend bicycle lanes on Pruneridge
Avenue. The Pruneridge Avenue corridor is
LGHQWL¿HGLQWKH&LW\¶V*HQHUDO
Plan as a recommended location for bicycle
lanes. Following the redesign of the two road
segments on either end, closing this gap in the
ELF\FOHQHWZRUNZDVLGHQWL¿HGDVDKLJKSULRULW\
UHFRPPHQGDWLRQLQWKH&LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD¶V
Bicycle Master Plan and a priority “Cross County
Bicycle Corridor” in the Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority (VTA) Countywide
Bicycle Plan. The Bicycle Plan Update 2018
UHFRPPHQGHGD&ODVV,,%%XɣHUHG%LF\FOH/DQH
as the facility on Pruneridge Avenue. Creating a
Complete Street design on Pruneridge Avenue
LVVXSSRUWLYHRIWKH&LW\¶V&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV
policy and resolution (No. 18-8593). This plan
DOVRVXSSRUWVWKH&LW\¶V&OLPDWH$FWLRQ3ODQE\
identifying strategies to improve bicycle and
pedestrian connectivity and reduce their level
RIWUDɤFVWUHVVLQRUGHUWRHQFRXUDJHPRGH
shifts from vehicles towards more sustainable
modes such as bicycling and walking.
.. . ..
r
·r··\ .. ·· .. ·· .

I • •' •·
:i ·····) · .... \ ... \. \
Ii [= ~ \ ~~- . . ::---, :
l : : ········ .... ........ /
r-------1 i ··•. -~ ---
- - - --~ ~.i .~~. ; \ Q, • _ \ ___ _
-,,:-:....::.-.: e t. ~ f'. ·,
I L ~
..... ' . ,:
:\ . •,'\_
'
I
~i
) ...,..,
C_.
,J
0 N
0 ,..........____
·~
I
8 0
e e
0 e
Celebrating Our
Past, Present and
Future
■
■
■
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

01. Introductionand Background
VTA Countywide Bicycle Plan
City Climate Action Plan
F1na1 o,ar1 M3y 2ou1 31
Strategy T2: Expand clean mobility options and use of non-SOV transportation modes Action T-2-1: Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan 9
Fund and accelerate implementation of the Pedestrian Master Plan and Bicycle Master Plan-focus ing on 1) closing gaps in the bicycle and pedestr ian networks with a focus on high demand arte rials; 2) installing painted buffers or phys ical vertical elements on high stress roadways documented in the Bicycle Master Plan; and 3) implementing spot improvements in high traffic areas (e.g., bicycle detection , bulb outs , and wayfinding elements)-such that walking and biking compr ise 6% of total city mode share .

Co-benefits:
► Enhances publ ic health by encouraging act ive transportat ion.

Pruneridge Avenue looking West.

Existing
Conditions

02. Technical analysis helps evaluate potential impacts caused by roadway design changes before they happen.

The analyses presented in this plan quantify potential
impacts of the design now and into the future in order to DVVLVWGHFLVLRQPDNHUV.H\PHWKRGRORJLHVDQG¿QGLQJV
IURPHDFKDQDO\VLVHɣRUWDUHVXPPDUL]HGEHORZZLWKIXOO memorandums included in the Appendices.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

02. Existing Conditions
Collision Analysis
The collision analysis was conducted for
the study corridor as well as adjacent street
segments on either end of the study boundaries.

On Pruneridge Avenue
(Pomeroy to Winchester)
The project obtained and evaluated historical
collision data from January 2015 to December
2021
1 to identify safety issues and potential
mitigations along the corridor. During this time
period, a total of 60 collisions resulting in an
injury or fatality were recorded; this includes one
fatal collision, four collisions involving people
biking, and three collisions involving people
walking, as shown in Map 2. This represents a
rate of .73 collisions per million vehicle miles
traveled on Pruneridge Avenue. This is slightly
higher than the 2017-2019 California average
of 0.60 for four-lane urban roadways

2. The
VLJQL¿FDQWPDMRULW\

RIWKHVHFROOLVLRQVRQ
Pruneridge Avenue occurred at an intersection.

Unsignalized intersections, typically two-
way stop controlled, experienced the largest
number of collisions with a total of 38; 18
collisions occurred at signalized intersections.

Adjacent to Pruneridge Avenue Study Area
The two segments of Pruneridge Avenue
which were redesigned between 2012 and 2017
present a case study for potential impacts of
a similar redesign within the study limits.

Pruneridge Avenue from Tantau to Pomeroy
was redesigned in 2012 from four lanes to two
in order to include bicycle lanes and reduce
vehicle speeds. After the redesign was completed,
collisions on this portion of Pruneridge
Avenue fell by 15%. Additionally, the segment
of W. Hedding (Pruneridge Avenue) east of
Winchester Boulevard located in the City of
San Jose saw a reduction in collisions of 33%.
1 Data obtained from the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Data does not include Property Damage Only (PDO) collision s as they are not tracked by the TIMS database. 2 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates) Map 2. 2015-2021 Collision Analysis
z

1.-~ UJ
' £';:!,~ i:r
. ____ __ _____ 3:_
4'. '
.J '
HOMESTEA D RD : STUDY AREA
• - - - - - - - - ... ,- - - - - .. - - - - - - •• • • 0 0 0 T • --' ... •-----,. -
>-0
0::: w
:!:
0 a.
" ,, .. ,
Cenlrlril ~rlW
- ,,.,.
c-;p,1,
-.smw
.. -
Study Corridor
Study A'ea Boundary
- - - • City Bouridary
Par~s
School
' ........ _____ __ ,.

Existing Bi'ke Facilities
- class I
-- Class II
--Class Ill
-- c:lnss IV
Collisions by Mode
• Pedes .ria 11
Bicyc l
• MoLor Vei'\icle
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

02. Existing Conditions
7UDɤF$QDO\VLV0HWKRGRORJ\
7KHSURMHFWFRQGXFWHGGHWDLOHGWUDɤFPRGHOLQJ
throughout the project area, including at 25
LQWHUVHFWLRQV7KLVHɣRUWHYDOXDWHGWKHRYHUDOO
/HYHORI6HUYLFH
/26

3 of each intersection
XVLQJEDVHOLQHDQGIXWXUHWUDɤFYROXPHV
DQGFRPSDUHGWKLVWRWKH/26SROLF\FULWHULD
from the City for each intersection.
7KH3ODQHYDOXDWHGFXUUHQWDQGIXWXUHWUDɤF
RSHUDWLRQVZLWKWKHH[LVWLQJFRQ¿JXUDWLRQDQG
DOOFRQFHSWGHVLJQVDVVXPLQJSUH&29,'WUDɤF
levels. The City developed representative pre-
&29,'WUDɤFYROXPHVXVLQJDQG

WUDɤFFRXQWVLQWKHVWXG\DUHD7KHSURMHFW
developed an adjustment factor by comparing
SUH&29,'GDWDDQGWUDɤFGDWDFROOHFWHG
during shelter-in-place. This factor was applied
to data collected in 2021 at the 25 study
intersections, where there was no historical
data, in order to develop representative baseline
WUDɤFYROXPHVIRUDQDO\VLVSXUSRVHV7KH
FRPSDULVRQVKRZHGWKDWWUDɤFFRXQWV
needed to be increased by 63% for the AM
peak hour and by 42% for the PM peak hour.
7KHSURMHFWWUDɤFDQDO\VLVDOVRSURMHFWHGWUDɤF
operations out to 2030 and 2040. A growth
factor developed from Valley Transportation
$XWKRULW\¶VWUDYHOGHPDQGPRGHOKHOSHGWKH
&LW\GHYHORSDQGWUDɤFYROXPH
estimates and gauge future impacts.
/HYHORI6HUYLFHLVDQDQDO\VLVPHWULFWRGHWHUPLQHKRZZHOO DQ intersection is operating and assigns rankings from A-F where A UHSUHVHQWVIUHHÀRZXQLPSHGHGPRYHPHQWDQG)UHSUHVHQWVVLJQL¿FD QW FRQJHVWLRQ/26'LQGLFDWHVDFFHSWDEOHRSHUDWLRQVDWDOOVWXG\ LQWHUVHFWLRQVEHVLGHV6DQ7RPDVZKHUH/26(LVDOVRDFFHSWDEOH GXHWR WKHVLJQL¿FDQWOHYHORIWUDɤFZKLFKWUDYHOVWKURXJKWKDWLQWHUV HFWLRQ Corridors (East-West)
Cross Streets (North-South)
Pruneridge Avenue Forbes Avenue Homestead Road 0DXULFLD$YHQXH

1. Pomeroy Avenue 13. Pomeroy Avenue 18. Pomeroy Avenue 23. Cronin Drive

2. Cronin Drive 14. Woodhams Road 19. Woodhams Road 24. Woodhams Road 5DGFOLɣH'ULYH 15. Kiely Boulevard 20. Kiely Boulevard 25. Kiely Boulevard

4. Woodhams Road 16. San Tomas Expressway 21. San Tomas Expressway

5. Redwood Avenue /RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUG /RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUG

6. Kiely Boulevard

7. Tanoak Drive

8. San Tomas Expressway

9. Saratoga Avenue

10. Cypress Avenue
/RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUG

12. Winchester Boulevard
Figure 1. Study Intersections
Figure 2. Study Intersections
1 13
18 19 20
23 24 25
21 22
14 15
16 17
2 3 4 56 7 8 9 10 11 12

STUDY AREA
-·,,,..,
·-· - -- .. '1
' ' .
' ' · --.. ---~i~-~a Jti.'ra f
' ' .. ------ -· '
or
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

02. Existing Conditions
7UDɤF9ROXPHVDQG'HOD\
%DVHOLQH([LVWLQJ9ROXPHV
3UH
&29,'DGMXVWHG
There are approximately
15,000 vehicles a day that traveled along
Pruneridge Avenue pre-Covid with a nearly
equal split between eastbound and westbound
WUDɤF7KH&LW\FROOHFWHGYHKLFOHYROXPHGDWDRQ
Pruneridge Avenue for a full seven-day period
from February 23, 2021 to March 1, 2021 and
shows volumes along Pruneridge Avenue to be
around 8,000 vehicles per day. The comparison
shows that the current ADT on Pruneridge
Avenue is approximately 45% lower compared
to pre-COVID volumes. This data is highlighted
in Figure 3. Methodologies and assumptions are
included in $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU.
([LVWLQJ,QWHUVHFWLRQ'HOD\ - The existing
IRXUODQHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQRQ3UXQHULGJH
$YHQXHZDVDQDO\]HGXVLQJEDVHOLQHWUDɤF
YROXPHVZLWKDGHWDLOHGWUDɤFDQDO\VLVPRGHO
for 25 intersections along and around the
corridor. This analysis highlighted that all
intersections except the San Tomas Expwy.
/ Pruneridge Ave intersection are currently
RSHUDWLQJDWDQDFFHSWDEOH/26DVVKRZQ
LQ)LJXUH$IXOOEUHDNGRZQRIWUDɤF
operations analysis results are included
in $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU.
# Location EB WB Total EB WB Total
1 Pruneridge (Lawrence - Pomeroy) 7-day 4,076 4,188 8,264 - - - Weekday (T-Th) 4,141 4,236 8,377 7,451 7,622 15,073
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 3,877 4,017 7,894 - - -
2 Pruneridge (Pomeroy - Kiely) 7-day 4,093 4,045 8,138 - - - Weekday (T-Th) 4,176 4,107 8,283 7,392 7,269 14,661
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 3,841 3,832 7,673 ---
3 Pruneridge (Kiely - Saratoga) 7-day 3,920 3,569 7,489 --- Weekday (T-Th) 4,090 3,580 7,670 7,626 6,675 14,301
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 3,595 3,398 6,993 ---
4 Pruneridge (Saratoga - Winchester) 7-day 4,421 3,858 8,279 --- Weekday (T-Th) 4,448 3,851 8,298 7,724 6,688 14,412
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 4,223 3,709 7,932 - - -
Notes:

Average Daily Traffic
2021 Counts Pre-COVID 1
1 For segments 1, 2 & 3, ADT derived based on the assumption that approximately 11% of the total daily traffic occurs during the PM peak hour. For segment 4, ADT based on November 2018 daily traffic count.

Figure 3. 3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH([LVWLQJ$YHUDJH'DLO\7UDɤF&RXQWV )RUWKHSXUSRVHRIWKLVVWXG\/26'RUEHWWHU
is considered acceptable intersection operation,
DQG/26(RU)LVFRQVLGHUHGGH¿FLHQWRSHUDWLRQ
except for the Congestion Management Program
(CMP) intersections and intersections along
H[SUHVVZD\V/26(RUEHWWHULVFRQVLGHUHG
DFFHSWDEOHDQG/26)LVGH¿FLHQW)LJXUHV
VKRZLQJWKHRSHUDWLRQVXQGHUEDVHOLQHWUDɤF
conditions for each analysis scenario display
the results for each study intersection using
these metrics. Detailed results are provided
in $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

02. Existing Conditions
Figure 4. Baseline (Existing) AM & PM
*LOS D or better is considered acceptable for all intersections; LOS E or better is acceptable for the San Tomas Expressway int ersection >c.

X w
w
(.)
z w
~
~
EarlR
Cann,chael
Park
: STUDYAREA
- - - ••••••• ■ ••••••••
>-0
Cl::'
UJ
~
0 a.

Central Central
Park Park
c,,,,,11p. 1,
cl//YTl""'•Y
$TEA/If
..

BENTON ST
Mary Gomez
Parle and Pool

STEVENS CREEK BLVD
~J••~- J••~-J••~~J••~-J••~- J••~~ J~•~ - J··~-J••~-J••~-J••~-J•·~- ...
•
>c.

X
w
CJ)
d
Baseline (Existing)

AM CD PM
• Acceptable *
• Unacceptable
. · · · · · ·. ~- -- N'EW H •• · •· ••• • * •••••
Mission City 1
Memorial Parle ;
HEDC
FORES
------ ' . , . ,.
' • ..
-study Corridor .... .. _ . _, ... --- ■ -1 , .

Study Are Boundary
- - - • City Bound ry
Parks
Schoo l
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

02. Existing Conditions

GAMBLIN DR

KIELY BLVD

JILL AVE

WINCHESTER BLVD

SLOAT CT

MARK TWAIN CT

HAYES AVE

CRONIN DR

REDWOOD AVE

DRAKE CT

CRESTVIEW DR

SARATOGA AVE

WESTRIDGE DR

KERRY DR

POMEROY AVE

HENRY AVE
RADCL

IFFE DR

TANOAK DR

LOS PADRES BLVD

LUTHER DR

SAN TOMAS EXPWY

CYPRESS AVE

HAROLD AVE

LANDEROS DR

BURNETT AVE

WOODHAMS RD

CEDAR WAY
Lightly Utilized
Plenty of extra spaces
Existing Parking ProhibitionHeavily Utilized
May have to park a block over
Target Residential Utilization
>50%30–49.9%15–29.9%<15%

AVAILABLE PARKING
Please note: parking data shown
represents results along Pruneridge and
one block north or south on side streets.
17 out of 28
available spots used
5 out of 36
available spots used

RADCLIFFE

TO WOODHAMS
12 out of 15
available spots used

SARATOGA

TO HAROLD
Figure 5. Average Total Parking Utilization: Existing Conditions (March 9-13, 2021) 3DUNLQJ$QDO\VLV
The project evaluated the current parking
utilization along Pruneridge Avenue from
Pomeroy Avenue to Winchester Boulevard,
including all side streets for up to one block
RɣRI3UXQHULGJH'DWDFROOHFWLRQRFFXUUHG
between Tuesday March 9 and Saturday March
13, 2021 during three distinct periods for a
representative analysis (7-9am, 11am-2pm,
and 2-4am). Figure 5 highlights the average
rates of available parking across all periods of
GDWDFROOHFWLRQ7KHVWXG\LGHQWL¿HGWKHKLJKHVW
area of localized parking demand between
Saratoga Ave and Cypress Ave. Furthermore,
this analysis indicates that 82% of the parking
spaces along Pruneridge Avenue are under
utilized throughout the day. (For the full report,
please see $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU.)
f)
g,~
~~ o
iii
iii
@)
'''' '''' ''''
::J
::J
::J
-~
'''''' '''''' '''''' '''''' '''''' ''''''
'''' '''' ''' '''
'''
:J
:IC
lr----1 i[fr
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

02. Existing Conditions
CupertinoSan
Jose
Cupertino
Santa
Clara
San JoseSanta Clara
FWY

LAFAYETTE ST
F
O
R
E
S
T
A
V
E

HEDDING ST

SANTOMASEXPY

WINCHESTER BLVD

HOMESTEAD RD

MONROEST

SCOTT BLVD
N
E
W
H
A
LL
S
T

N IM IT Z FW Y

SARATOGA AVE

S A N TO M A S EXPY

KIELY BLVD

LAWRENCEEXPY

MOORPARK AVE
B
E
N
TO
N
S
T

STEVENS CREEK BLVD
JU
N
IP
ER
O
S
E
R
R
A
F
W
Y
Earl R
Carmichael
Park
Mary Gomez
Park and Pool
Henry
Schmidt
Park
Townsend
Field
Mission City
Memorial Park
Central
Park Central
Park
Pruneridge
Golf Course
Maywood Park
John
Mise
Park
Raynor
Park
Santa
Clara High School
Haman
Elementary
School
John Sutter
Elementary
School Millikin
Basics+
Eisenhower
School
Buscher
Middle
School
Westwood
School
Pomeroy
Elementary
School
Laurelwood
Elementary
School
Wilson High
School
Washington Open
Elementary School
Central Park
Elementary
STEAM
3581(5,'*($9(

STUDY AREA
Map 3. Pruneridge Avenue Average Speed Survey Results (7-days) Lawrence to Pomeroy
WB
WK03+

!03+Lawrence to Pomeroy
EB
WK03+
!03+
Pomeroy to Kiely EB
WK03+
!03+
Pomeroy to Kiely WB
WK
03+
!03+
Kiely to Saratoga WB
WK03+

!03+
Saratoga to
Winchester WB
WK03+
!03+
Saratoga to
Winchester EB
WK03+
!03+
Kiely to Saratoga EB
WK
03+

!03+
Speed Survey
The City collected speed data at four locations
along the corridor across an entire seven-day
period during peak and non-peak periods in
order to gauge speeding issues on Pruneridge
Avenue. Pruneridge Avenue has a posted speed
limit of 35 miles per hour (mph). Pruneridge
Avenue westbound between Saratoga and
Winchester experienced 57% of vehicles traveling
faster than 35 MPH during the study period.

The speed survey showed that 85th percentile
speeds are generally higher than the posted speed
limit of 35 mph but within approximately 7 mph,
as shown in Map 3. Typically, arterial streets have
speeds within 7 mph of the posted speed limit.

Based on this survey, there is an opportunity to
reduce vehicle speeds through an application of
roadway designs and additional enforcement.

Potential Corridor
Alternative
Concepts
The City developed four redesign concepts
of varying intensity within the roadway. Each design
FRQFHSWDVZHOODVWKHH[LVWLQJFRQ¿JXUDWLRQRU³1R%XLOG´ scenario, are described below along with the corridor
transportation analysis. A summary comparison between
design concepts is included at the end of the section.

03. 8’
12’ 8’
5’
5’64’CURB TO
CURB
12’
12’ 12’
8’
8’

PROPERTY
LINE
P
P

PRUNERIDGE AVE

PROPERTY
LINE
APPROX. 90’
ROW
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts

INTERSECTIONS / CORNERS
Sweeping corners and long crossing distances for
sidewalk users promote higher vehicle speeds.

These intersection corner designs are based on old
design standards.

CANOPY TREES
Intermittent matures trees spread
along the corridor provide shade where
present. Most trees are on private
property setback from roadway and do
not provide shade for the sidewalk.

RESIDENTIAL CONTEXT
The majority of the Pruneridge
corridor is lined with single-family
KRPHVWKDWGH¿QHWKLVDUHD¶V
residential character

PARKING LANES
Curbside parallel parking is
present along a majority of
the corridor.

Existing Conditions /
No Build
/DQHV3DUNLQJRQ%RWK6LGHV
• ¶7UDɤF/DQHV
• ¶&XUEWR&XUE:LGWK
•
¶7RWDO52:
7KLVLVWKHH[LVWLQJFRQ¿JXUDWLRQRQ
Pruneridge Avenue, present along a majority
of the corridor between Pomeroy and
Winchester, with four vehicle travel lanes
and parking on both sides with no bicycle
lanes and older intersection designs.
64’CURB TO
CURB
5’8’
2’
2’
10’ 11’ 11’ 10’
5’
5’5’

PRUNERIDGE AVE
P
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts

CURB-EXTENSION & HIGH-

VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
(at select intersections)
enhances pedestrian safety by
increasing visibility and reducing
crossing length (short-term quick-build
painted option shown).

RESTRICTED PARKING
(red curb)
at intersection
approaches.

TRASH BIN

LOCATION
for pick up days.

SIGHT LINE
BUFFER
increase
sight lines at
driveways.

PARKING LANE
retains parking areas on one side
of the corridor.

BUFFERED BIKE LANES
on both sides of the corridor are provided
with striped buffers, similar to W. Hedding
St. east of Pruneridge Ave.
¶ELNHODQHZLWK
¶EXIIHU
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU

ADDITIONAL

CANOPY TREES
¿OOLQWKHJDSVIRU
shade and add to the
residential character of
the street, within public
ROW adjacent to back of
sidewalk.

INTERSECTION APPROACH CONSIDERATIONS:
Green-backed bike symbol at intersection approach for visibility Bulb-outs, option for curb extensions or short-term quick-build painted option 3DUNLQJLVUHVWULFWHGDWFRUQHUVZLWKEROODUGVDQGELNHODQHV LPSURYHGVLJKWOLQHVLVDFREHQH¿W Leading pedestrian phase and bike phase or indication Add vertical barrier to further protect bicyclists from right turn movements. If installed, vehicles are restricted from turni ng right on red.

Concept 1
)RXU/DQHV
5HPRYH3DUNLQJ2Q2QH6LGH
•M a i n t a i n f o u r t r a v e l l a n e s
• Parking on one side of roadway
• %XɣHUHGELNHODQHV
• Curb-extensions and high-visibility
crosswalks at select intersection locations
• Canopy trees
This concept retains four vehicle lanes but
removes parking from one side of the street in
RUGHUWRDFFRPPRGDWHEXɣHUHGELF\FOHODQHV
LQERWKGLUHFWLRQV7KHEXɣHUHGELNHODQH
ZRXOGEH¿YHIHHWZLGHZLWKDWZRIRRWEXɣHU
between the travel lane and bicyclists. This
concept includes no changes to the existing
VLGHZDONV6LJKWOLQHEXɣHUVDWWKHGULYHZD\V
improve visibility for cars, bicyclists, and
pedestrians while aiding driveway entry/exit.
64’CURB TO
CURB
8’ 5’ 10’ 12’ 10’ 5’ 8’
5’
5’
3’
3’
P
P

PRUNERIDGE AVE

3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts

CURB-EXTENSION & HIGH-

VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
(at select intersections)
enhances pedestrian safety by
increasing visibility and reducing
crossing length (short-term quick-
build painted option shown).

RESTRICTED

PARKING
(RED CURB)
at intersection
approaches.

TRASH BIN

LOCATION
for pick up
days.

SIGHT LINE BUFFER
increase sight lines at
driveways.

BUFFERED BIKE LANES
on both sides of the corridor are provided with
striped buffers, similar to W. Hedding St. east of
Pruneridge Ave.

PARKING LANE
retains parking areas on both
sides of the corridor.
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU

ADDITIONAL

CANOPY TREES
¿OOLQWKHJDSVIRUVKDGHDQG
add to the residential character
of the street, within public ROW
adjacent to back of sidewalk.

INTERSECTION APPROACH CONSIDERATIONS:
Include green-backed bike symbol at intersection approach for visibility Include bulb-outs, option for curb extensions or short-term quick-build painted option Add vertical barrier to further protect bicyclists from right turn movements. If installed, vehicles are restricted from turni ng right on red. 3DUNLQJLVUHVWULFWHGDWFRUQHUVZLWKEROODUGVDQGELNHODQHV LPSURYHGVLJKWOLQHVLVDFREHQH¿W Modify signal timing to include leading pedestrian and bike intervals Concept 2
7ZR/ D QH V
• Maintain two travel lanes
• Center two-way left turn lane
• Parking on both sides of roadway
• %XɣHUHGELNHODQHV
• Curb-extensions and high-visibility
crosswalks at select intersection locations
• Canopy trees
This concept provides two travel lanes and a
center-turn lane with parking on both sides
RIWKHVWUHHWEXɣHUHGELNHODQHVFDQRS\
trees, and curb-extensions and high-visibility
crosswalks at selection intersections. Sightline
EXɣHUVDWWKHGULYHZD\VLPSURYHYLVLELOLW\IRU
cars, bicyclists, and pedestrians while aiding
driveway entry/exit. This concept includes
two eastbound through lanes between San
Tomas and Saratoga with the outermost lane
becoming a right-turn lane at Saratoga Avenue.

At full implementation, this concept may
UHTXLUHPRGL¿FDWLRQRIVLJQDOWLPLQJVDQG
incorporation of pedestrian and bicycle
intervals and bicycle signal heads.
8’
8’
5’
5’64’CURB TO
CURB
5’
5’
3’
3’
10’ 12’ 10’
P
P

PRUNERIDGE AVE
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts

CURB-EXTENSION & HIGH-VISIBILITY
CROSSWALKS (at select intersections)
enhances pedestrian safety by increasing
visibility and reducing crossing length (short-term
quick-build painted option shown).

TRASH BIN

LOCATION
for pick up
days.

SIGHT LINE BUFFER
increase sight lines at
driveways.

PARKING LANE
retains parking areas
on both sides of the
corridor, protects
bicyclists, and
maintains clear sight
lines from driveways.

SEPARATED BIKEWAY
on both sides of the corridor are further
VHSDUDWHGIURPWUDI¿FZLWKSDUNLQJODQHWKH
¶EXIIHUVHSDUDWHVELF\FOLVWVIURPWKRVH
opening their door.
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU

ADDITIONAL

CANOPY TREES
¿OOLQWKHJDSVIRUVKDGH
and add to the residential
character of the street,
within public ROW adjacent
to back of sidewalk.

INTERSECTION APPROACH CONSIDERATIONS:
Include green-backed bike symbol at intersection approach for visibility Include bulb-outs, option for curb extensions or short-term quick-build painted option 3DUNLQJLVUHVWULFWHGDWFRUQHUVZLWKEROODUGVDQGELNHODQHV LPSURYHGVLJKWOLQHVLVDFREHQH¿W Modify signal timing to include leading pedestrian and bike intervals Vehicles are restricted from turning right on red.

Concept 3
3DUNLQJ3URWHFWHG6HSDUDWHG%LNHZD\
• Maintain two travel lanes
•T w o - w a y c e n t e r - t u r n l a n e
• Parking on both sides of roadway
•P a r k i n g p r o v i d e s p h y s i c a l
separation for cyclist
• %XɣHUVVLGHZDONZLWKELNHODQHDQGSDUNLQJ
• Curb-extensions and high-visibility
crosswalks at select intersection locations
• Canopy trees
Similar to Concept 2, this concept also provides
two travel lanes, a center-turn lane, parking
on both sides of the road, canopy trees, and
curb-extensions and high-visibility crosswalks
at select intersections. This concept includes
two eastbound through lanes between San
Tomas and Saratoga with the outermost
lane becoming a right-turn lane at Saratoga
$YHQXH7KHNH\GLɣHUHQFHEHWZHHQ&RQFHSWV
2 and 3 is an exchange between the bicycle
lane and the parking to create a ‘parking
SURWHFWHG¶ELNHODQHZKLFKLVSK\VLFDOO\
separated from moving vehicles. Sightline
EXɣHUVDWWKHGULYHZD\VLPSURYHYLVLELOLW\IRU
cars, bicyclists, and pedestrians while aiding
driveway entry/exit. At full implementation,
WKLVFRQFHSWPD\UHTXLUHPRGL¿FDWLRQRIVLJQDO
timings and incorporation of pedestrian and
bicycle intervals and bicycle signal heads.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Concept 4
The Hybrid Concept
• Created to meet project goals and
UHGXFHWUDɤFFRQJHVWLRQEDVHGRQ
community and Council feedback.
• %XɣHUHGELNHODQHVRUVHSDUDWHG
bikeways along entire corridor.
• 0LQLPL]H/HYHORI6HUYLFHLPSDFWV
at critical intersections
• %XɣHUVVLGHZDONZLWKELNHODQHDQGSDUNLQJ
• Improves pedestrian and bicyclist
visibility at intersections
This concept combines numerous elements
from the three previous concepts to strike a
balance between modal considerations. This
FRQFHSWKDVWZRGLɣHUHQWGHVLJQYDULDWLRQV

• :LWK%XɣHUHG%LNH/DQHV
&ODVV,,%
RU

• With Parking-Protected
%LNH/DQHV
&ODVV,9

Under each design variation, this concept
ZRXOGUHFRQ¿JXUHWKHSRUWLRQRIWKHURDGZD\
EHWZHHQ3RPHUR\$YHQXHDQG/XWKHU'ULYH
as well as Harold Avenue to Winchester
Boulevard, to have two travel lanes in each
direction with a center-turn lane (Concept
2/3). The center section would include four
ten-foot-wide travel lanes and a center-turn
ODQHDORQJZLWKEXɣHUHGELNHODQHVVKRZQ
on the next page. The road would transition
EHWZHHQWKHVHGLɣHUHQWFRQ¿JXUDWLRQVWKURXJK
PXOWLEORFNVHFWLRQVIURP/XWKHU'ULYHWR
*DPEOLQ'ULYHDQGIURP6DUDWRJD$YHQXH
to Harold Avenue, as shown to the right.

Map 4. Concept 4 Segment Map
STUDY AREA •:, ....................... ~ ................. ,, .

Two-Lanes

4. Ill
M;,ryGomez
Parl< aodPool
Four-Lanes
Tramtition
"'
,..,,,,,
$d»,,I
' I
MISSHJII City I
Two-t'an'ei"' :

HEDI
FORES

PRUNERIDGE AVE
64’CURB TO
CURB
8’ 5’ 10’ 12’ 10’
5’ 8’
5’
5’
3’
3’
P
P
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Concept 4
&RUULGRU0DS
• This concept was produced in response to
concerns expressed about the vehicle travel time
delay possible with Concept 2 and Concept 3.
• This concept transitions the roadway between
sections with four travel lanes and two travel
lanes at the approach to the intersections of
*DPEOLQDQG6DUDWRJDWRUHGXFHWUDɤFGHOD\V
• &RQFHSWKDVWZRGLVWLQFWGHVLJQYDULDWLRQV

Ń :LWK%XɣHUHG%LNH/DQHV
&RQFHSW
RU
Ń :LWK3DUNLQJ3URWHFWHG%LNH/DQHV
&RQFHSW

TRANSITION FROM ROAD

RECONFIGURATION TO HYBRID
Bike lanes and travel lanes begin transition to
accommodate the hybrid concept

BUFFERED BIKE LANES

OR CYCLETRACK
on both sides of the corridor
are separated with striped
buffers, similar to W. Hedding
St. east of Pruneridge Ave.
4-LANE SECTION
2-LANE SECTION
TRANSITION:
%HJLQQLQJRIWKHWUDQVLWLRQIURPURDGZD\FRQ¿JXUDWLRQ concepts to hybrid concepts
¶%LNH/DQHVZLWK¶%XIIHULQWUDQVLWLRQ]RQH%XIIHUZLGHQV WR ¶ZKHQURDGZD\EHFRPHV&RQFHSWRU
¶&XUEWR&XUE:LGWK
¶7UDYHO/DQHV
CONCEPT 4: TRANSITION ZONES
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
MID-BLOCK:
)LYH

¶ZLGHWUDYHOODQHV
Buffered bike lanes

BUFFERED BIKE LANES OR

CYCLETRACK
on both sides of the corridor are
separated with striped buffers,
similar to W. Hedding St. east of
Pruneridge Ave.

Concept 4: Mid-Block example
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU
4 LANES
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts

EXAMPLE OF INTERSECTION
More advanced bicycle protection may be possible in the future, but will require additional coordination with the County. The example shown here is for intersection such as San Tomas, a County owned roadway

MIXING ZONE
signage and roadway
markings alert all users to
DVKDUHGWUDQVLWLRQ]RQH
near the intersection

BUFFERED BIKE LANES OR CYCLETRACK
on both sides of the corridor are separated with
striped buffers, similar to W. Hedding St. east of
Pruneridge Ave.

Concept 4 - Intersection Example
INTERSECTION:

Example Illustration of County owned intersection like San Tomas.
Intersection improvement possibilities are limited at this time. There may be opportunities to coordinate with the County on future improvements as shown on the Pedestrian Improvements Map for this location
Buffered bike lanes
6WULSLQJDQGVLJQDJHLQELNHDQGFDUPL[LQJ]RQHQHDU intersection
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU
Intersection
·~ •
~L~'L-->L. :, "" ~1~:1~~~:;j
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Corridor Transportation Analysis
The City conducted an in-depth corridor
transportation analysis along Pruneridge
$YHQXHWRJDXJHWKHH[LVWLQJDQGIXWXUHWUDɤF
RSHUDWLRQVXQGHUWKHFXUUHQWFRQ¿JXUDWLRQ
and the alternative concepts, changes to
SDUNLQJELF\FOHDQGSHGHVWULDQEHQH¿WVDQG
HQKDQFHPHQWVWRVDIHW\,QRUGHUWRJDXJHWUDɤF
impacts, the City evaluated a wide variety of
PHWULFVLQFOXGLQJWUDɤFGLYHUVLRQYHKLFOHGHOD\
corridor travel time, and vehicle miles traveled.
7KH&LW\GHYHORSHGDUREXVWWUDɤFDQDO\VLV
micro-simulation model to guide the complex
analysis. The model outputs and analysis
¿QGLQJVIURPWKHFRUULGRUWUDQVSRUWDWLRQ
DQDO\VLVKHOSHGWRLGHQWLI\SRWHQWLDOWUDGHRɣV
between concepts and are summarized below.

Each design concept was evaluated using
the following metrics. Analysis results for all
design concepts are summarized at the end of
this section. Technical Memoranda detailing
WKHVSHFL¿FPHWKRGRORJ\IRUHDFKHYDOXDWLRQ
metric are available in Appendix A.
9HKLFOH6SHHGLQJ - Vehicle speeding was
evaluated using speed survey data. The
current speed limit on Pruneridge Avenue
is 35 MPH. Potential reductions in speeding
resulting from elements of each concept
design are noted when applicable.

Safety - Safety was evaluated by reviewing
collision history along the corridor and
reviewing before and after collision data
IURPWKHURDGUHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQVRQRWKHU
segments of the Pruneridge/Hedding corridor.

The impacts of infrastructure changes
are noted for the conceptual designs.
9HKLFOH&RQJHVWLRQ - Based on historical and
DGMXVWHGFXUUHQWWUDɤFGDWDLQWHUVHFWLRQDQG
corridor analyses were conducted to quantify
WKHSRWHQWLDOHɣHFWVRIWKHFRQFHSWGHVLJQVRQ
vehicle delay, congestion, and vehicle miles
WUDYHOHG7KH&LW\DQDO\]HGWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQV
for Baseline, 2030, and 2040 conditions under
three distinct scenarios representing the project
concepts. Results for the analysis are included
in $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Figure 6. No Build & Concept 1 (Four Lanes) - AM & PM7UDɤF$QDO\VLV )RUWKHSXUSRVHRIWKLVVWXG\/HYHORI6HUYLFH

/26
'RUEHWWHULVFRQVLGHUHGDFFHSWDEOH
LQWHUVHFWLRQRSHUDWLRQDQG/26(RU)LV
FRQVLGHUHGGH¿FLHQWRSHUDWLRQ+RZHYHUDW
Congestion Management Program (CMP)
intersections and intersections along
H[SUHVVZD\V/26(RUEHWWHULVFRQVLGHUHG
DFFHSWDEOHDQG/26)LVGH¿FLHQW)LJXUHV
VKRZLQJWKHRSHUDWLRQVXQGHUEDVHOLQHWUDɤF
conditions for each analysis scenario display
the results for each study intersection using
these metrics. Detailed results are provided
in $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU
No Build Option & Concept 1 (Four lanes)
Both the No Build Option and Concept 1
maintain the existing number of travel lanes on
Pruneridge Avenue and thus operate with the
VDPHOHYHORIFDSDFLW\DQG/26%RWKRSWLRQV
ZHUHHYDOXDWHGXVLQJEDVHOLQHWUDɤFYROXPHV
The analysis highlighted that all intersections
except the San Tomas / Pruneridge Avenue
intersection are currently operating at an
DFFHSWDEOH/26DQGZRXOGFRQWLQXHWRRSHUDWH
DWDQDFFHSWDEOH/26XQGHUERWKWKH1R
%XLOG2SWLRQDQG&RQFHSW
)RXU/DQHV

7KH&LW\HYDOXDWHGIXWXUHWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQV
by projecting volumes forward to 2030
and 2040 with growth factors generated
from the VTA travel demand model. This
analysis is available in Appendix A.
*Acceptable operations - A Level of Service (LOS) D or better. For CMP intersections, LOS E or better is acceptable. ► a.
t;j
w u z w
0:
~
..J
EanR
Cam,,chael
Porl<
>-0
0:

UJ
!i
0 a.

Centflll Ctmtral
Poff< Podr

BENTON ST
"'8,yGomel
Porl<ondPool
... ··•-.
► a.

X
w
<I)
.,,
No Build & Concept 1
(Four Lanes)

AM CD PM
• Acceptable
• Unacceptable
' ' , __ ____ _
, . .. .. -s1udy Comdor
Study Are.a Boundary
~ - ~ • City Boundary
-.......... .., .. .,..., ___ .. ,.

Parks
SChool
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
&RQFHSWVDQG
7ZR/DQHV

Under Concepts 2 and 3, Pruneridge Avenue
would be converted from four lanes to two lanes
(one lane in each direction) with a center-turn
lane between Pomeroy Avenue and Winchester
Boulevard in order to accommodate dedicated
bike lanes in each direction. These concepts
would also provide two eastbound through-
lanes between San Tomas Expressway and
Saratoga Ave; turning into a right-turn only
ODQHDW6DUDWRJD$YHQXH7UDɤFDQDO\VLVUHVXOWV
IRUERWKFRQFHSWVDUHEDVHGRQEDVHOLQHWUDɤF
YROXPHVDQGLQGLFDWHWKDWWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQV
ZRXOGIDOOEHORZSROLF\/26DWWKHIROORZLQJ
LQWHUVHFWLRQVLQWKHSHULRGVLGHQWL¿HG
• Kiely Blvd / Pruneridge Ave - AM and PM
•T a n o a k D r / P r u n e r i d g e A v e - P M •S a n Tomas Expressway /
Pruneridge Ave - AM and PM
• Saratoga Ave / Pruneridge Ave - AM
• Cypress Ave / Pruneridge Ave - AM
7KHSURMHFWWUDɤFDQDO\VLVDOVRSURMHFWHGWUDɤF
operations out to 2030 and 2040. A growth
factor developed from Valley Transportation
$XWKRULW\¶VWUDYHOGHPDQGPRGHOKHOSHGWKH
&LW\GHYHORSDQGWUDɤFYROXPH
estimates and gauge future impacts.

Figure 7. Concepts 2 and 3 (Two Lanes) - AM & PM
*Acceptable operations - A Level of Service (LOS) D or better. For CMP intersections, LOS E or better is acceptable. ► Q.
~
w u z w
It:
} _,
Elll1R
C;,,m,chaol
P•rl<
>-0
D::
w
~
0 a.

Central C•nlml
Pftrk Ptirlc
·•
t.4'1#.IP•I
£1,,,,,,.,,,..,,
SIEA/ff

BENTON ST
... •··• ..

Mary Gomez
Porl<ondPuol

STEVENS CREEK BLVD
-- ~ ~-J•~~ •JJ•~~~J•~~-J••~•JJ•~~-J•~~•JJ4•~~ •J••~•-•J4•~-~··~--J••~-~··~~ ► 0.

X
w
rn
Concepts 2 and 3
(Two lanes)

AM CD PM
• Acceptable •
• Unacceptable
, c
I :j
m
It:
w ... rn
'
-study Co"idor
Study Area Boundary
- - - ~ C1cv Bou dary
Parks.

School
HEDI
FORES
.. , . ..
' •
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Concept 4 (Hybrid)
The hybrid concept has a combination of 4 travel
lanes and Concept 2 or 3, which results in a
better operational outcome for congestion. This
FRQFHSWDSSOLHVWKH&RQFHSWFRQ¿JXUDWLRQ
IURP3RPHUR\$YHQXHWR/XWKHU'ULYHDQG
Harold Avenue to Winchester Blvd, and
provides four travel lanes with a center-turn
ODQHEHWZHHQ*DPEOLQ'ULYHDQG6DUDWRJD
Avenue with transition zones between the
YDULRXVFRQ¿JXUDWLRQV7UDɤFDQDO\VLVUHVXOWV
IRUWKLVVFHQDULRDUHEDVHGRQEDVHOLQHWUDɤF
YROXPHVDQGLQGLFDWHWKDWWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQV
ZRXOGIDOOEHORZSROLF\/26DWWKHIROORZLQJ
LQWHUVHFWLRQVLQWKHSHULRGVLGHQWL¿HG

• Kiely Blvd / Pruneridge Ave - AM
•T a n o a k D r / P r u n e r i d g e A v e - A M • San Tomas Expressway / Pruneridge Ave - AM
7KHSURMHFWWUDɤFDQDO\VLVDOVRSURMHFWHGWUDɤF
operations out to 2030 and 2040. A growth
factor developed from Valley Transportation
$XWKRULW\¶VWUDYHOGHPDQGPRGHOKHOSHGWKH
&LW\GHYHORSDQGWUDɤFYROXPH
estimates and gauge future impacts.

Figure 8. Concept 4 (Hybrid) - AM & PM
*Acceptable operations - A Level of Service (LOS) D or better. For CMP intersections, LOS E or better is acceptable. >Q.
>< LLI
LLI
0 z
LI.I
a:
!
'
>-0 a:

UJ
,::!!:
0 Q.
: STUDY AREA " --:· ······· ....... ·· ····-···· ... ··-· •
CeNral CentraJ
Pat1'. Part
·•

BENTON ST
>
Q.
><
LI.I
1/)
d
Concept 4 (Hybrid)

AMCD PM
• Acceptable*
• Unacceptable
HEDI
FORES
,_ --- --, :
- - - - City Boundary
Parks
SchOOI
•· .. •.

3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
9HKLFOH'LYHUVLRQ
7UDɤFGLYHUVLRQLVDVVXPHGWRRFFXUDV
residents and visitors readjust travel patterns
ZLWKWKHUHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQIURPIRXUWRWZRODQHV
(Concepts 2 and 3). The following two maps
highlight the number of vehicles diverting along
parallel street and side-streets in the study area
during the morning and evening peak hours.

In the AM peak hour (Figure 9), volumes
on Pruneridge Avenue are mainly diverting
to arterial and collector roadways such
as San Tomas Expressway, Winchester
Boulevard, Stevens Creek Boulevard,
DQG/RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUG
The legends in Figure 9 and 10 highlight the
total number of vehicles per hour that are
DQWLFLSDWHGWRGLYHUW,W¶VLPSRUWDQWWRQRWHWKDW
orange indicates new diversion routes and blue
indicates the route vehicles diverted from.

In the PM peak hour (Figure 10), volumes on
Pruneridge decrease in the peak eastbound
direction, especially between Woodhams
Road and San Tomas Expressway. Vehicles
are diverting to the same roadways as in
the AM peak hour. While there would be
an increase in vehicles onto these other
roadways, the increased volumes do not cause
the roadways to operate over capacity.

Diversion to other local streets not mapped
may occur, but would be less than 50 per hour
during the busiest times in the day. This means
less than one new car diverting per minute. This
OHYHORIWUDɤFLVJHQHUDOO\QHJOLJLEOHDQGZLOO
not cause operational issues. A full breakdown
RIWKHDVVXPHGWUDɤFGLYHUVLRQLVLQFOXGHG
in $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
6DQWD
&ODUD
6XQQ\YDOH
6DQ
-RVH
3UXQHULGJH$YH
6DUDWRJD$YH
0DXULFLD$YH
/DZUHQFH([S\
3RPHUR\$YH
/RV3DGUHV%OYG
6FRWW%OYG6FRWW%OYG6FRWW%OYG
1:LQFKHVWHU%OYG
)RUEHV$YH
7DQRDN'U
.LHO\%OYG
6DQ7RPDV([SZ\6DQ7RPDV([SZ\6DQ7RPDV([SZ\
:RRGKDPV5G
+RPHVWHDG5G+RPHVWHDG5G+RPHVWHDG5G
%HQWRQ6W%HQWRQ6W%HQWRQ6W
6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG
&URQLQ'U&URQLQ'U
5HGZRRG5HGZRRG
$YH$YH
5DGFOLIIH5DGFOLIIH
'U'U
&URQLQ'U
5HGZRRG
$YH
5DGFOLIIH
'U
&\SUHVV&\SUHVV
$YH$YH
&\SUHVV
$YH
0RQURH6W0RQURH6W0RQURH6W
LEGEND
'HFUHDVHLQ7UDIILFWRYSK
'HFUHDVHLQ7UDIILFWRYSK
'HFUHDVHLQ7UDIILFWRYSK
'HFUHDVHLQ7UDIILF!YSK
,QFUHDVHLQ7UDIILFWRYSK
,QFUHDVHLQ7UDIILFWRYSK
,QFUHDVHLQ7UDIILFWRYSK
,QFUHDVHLQ7UDIILF!YSK
&LW\/LPLWV
Figure 9. $07UDɤF)ORZ
%DVHOLQH

f
.----._, ,_ >
~<(
- l l ~
-----r-+-----,- --~-- ----------'--.1....-.J-~
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
6DQWD
&ODUD
6XQQ\YDOH
6DQ
-RVH
3UXQHULGJH$YH
6DUDWRJD$YH
0DXULFLD$YH
/DZUHQFH([S\
3RPHUR\$YH
/RV3DGUHV%OYG
6FRWW%OYG6FRWW%OYG6FRWW%OYG
1:LQFKHVWHU%OYG
)RUEHV$YH
7DQRDN'U
.LHO\%OYG
6DQ7RPDV([SZ\6DQ7RPDV([SZ\6DQ7RPDV([SZ\
:RRGKDPV5G
+RPHVWHDG5G+RPHVWHDG5G+RPHVWHDG5G
%HQWRQ6W%HQWRQ6W%HQWRQ6W
6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG
&URQLQ'U&URQLQ'U
5HGZRRG5HGZRRG
$YH$YH
5DGFOLIIH5DGFOLIIH
'U'U
&URQLQ'U
5HGZRRG
$YH
5DGFOLIIH
'U
&\SUHVV&\SUHVV
$YH$YH
&\SUHVV
$YH
0RQURH6W0RQURH6W0RQURH6W
/(*(1'
'HFUHDVHLQ7UDIILFWRYSK
'HFUHDVHLQ7UDIILFWRYSK
'HFUHDVHLQ7UDIILFWRYSK
'HFUHDVHLQ7UDIILF!YSK
,QFUHDVHLQ7UDIILFWRYSK
,QFUHDVHLQ7UDIILFWRYSK
,QFUHDVHLQ7UDIILFWRYSK
,QFUHDVHLQ7UDIILF!YSK
&LW\/LPLWV
Figure 10. 307UDɤF)ORZ
%DVHOLQH

f---+-'I~ ~ ; I I I,
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Table 1. Parking Utilization for removing north side parking Location # of Available
Parking
Average Cars
Estimated
Estimated
Utilization Rate
Pruneridge - North Side 00 0 %
Pruneridge - South Side 233 82 35%
Location # of Available
Parking
Average Cars
Estimated
Estimated
Utilization Rate
Pruneridge - North Side 220 83 38%
Pruneridge - South Side 00 0 %
Table 2. Parking Utilization from removing south side parking Concept VMT Reduction Today VMT Reduction 2030
No Build Option No Change No Change
Concept 1: 4 Lane Option No Change No Change
Concept 2: 2 Lane Option

0.5% reduction 0.6% reductionConcept 3: Parking Protected Option C
oncept 4: Hybrid Option
Table 3. Vehicle Miles Traveled
3DUNLQJ8VDJH
Parking was studied along Pruneridge and
for one block on each side street (both sides).

There are 453 parking spaces on Pruneridge
Avenue. There are also an additional 539
parking spaces on side streets studied.

Analysis showed that there is adequate
parking available along the corridor and
side-streets. If parking were consolidated on
one side of the street under Concept 1, on-
street parking would be available to meet the
demand. Parking utilization rates would be
38% to 35%, should parking be removed on
the south side or north side, respectively.
9HKLFOH0LOHV7UDYHOHG
0RGLI\LQJWKHURDGZD\FRQ¿JXUDWLRQDQG
providing dedicated space for bicyclists was
evaluated for a potential impact on local Vehicle
Miles Traveled. Findings from this analysis
are included in Table 3. This analysis does not
account for potential future modal shifts out
of vehicles due to an improved walking and
bicycling network and enhanced conditions.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Table 4. Corridor Travel Times (minutes)– Alternatives Comparison Concept Morning Westbound
(peak direction)
Evening Eastbound
(peak direction)
No Build Option 8.2 10.8
Concept 1: 4 Lane Option 8.2 10.8
Concept 2: 2 Lane Option 16.8 14.7
Concept 3: Parking Protected Option 16.8 14.7
Concept 4: Hybrid Option 11.5 11.5
Corridor Travel Time
The project analyzed the impact to vehicle
travel times along the corridor under baseline
conditions using simulation modeling. This
travel time is the time it would take a vehicle
to traverse Pruneridge Avenue between
Winchester Boulevard and Pomeroy Avenue.

As shown in Table 4, Concepts 2 and 3 resulted
in a notable increase in the average travel
time, especially during the morning peak hour.

Travel time in the morning takes 8.2 minutes
in the busiest direction during rush hour.

Under Concepts 2 and 3, that time is estimated
to increase 105% to 16.8 minutes. The primary
reason that the travel time doubles in the
morning westbound peak direction is the long
cycle length at San Tomas / Pruneridge, coupled
with only one through-lane in each direction
at this intersection. The project assumed green
times on Pruneridge did not increase at San
Tomas, as the County prioritizes the Expressway.

Current travel time in the evening takes

10.8 minutes in the busiest direction during
rush hour.

Under Concepts 2 and 3, that time is estimated
to increase 37% to 14.7 minutes. Due to the
increased capacity associated with Concept 4,
vehicle corridor travel times are less impacted
than under Concepts 2 and 3. Travel time
increases to 11.5 minutes in the peak direction
under both AM and PM peak periods; a 40%
and 6.5% increase in travel time respectively.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
7UDႈF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULF Results
Vehicle Speeding
Typically, 85% of drivers travel up to 7 MPH above the 35 MPH posted speed limit.

Eastbound travel speeds are generally more consistent than westbound speeds.

Westbound between Saratoga and Winchester experienced the highest speeds, with almost 60% of vehicles traveling faster than 35 MPH.

Safety Collisions were studied between 2015 – 2021. Across all modes (vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists), 60 collisions occurred.

Vehicle Congestion No change. There is one intersection that currently operates unacceptably.

Parking Usage
$YHUDJH3DUNLQJ8VDJH
SHUFHQWRIWRWDOSDUNLQJVSDFHVRFFXSLHG

• :HHNGD\PRUQLQJV

• :HHNGD\HYHQLQJV

• :HHNGD\RYHUQLJKW

• :HHNHQG

On average, on a typical block, eight out of ten parking spaces would be available.

The overall average utilization rate on side streets is 14%. Three side streets had DQDYHUDJHXWLOL]DWLRQDERYH
ERWKVLGHVRI&UHVWYLHZDQGRQHVLGHRI-LOODQG
Burnett.

Table 5. ([LVWLQJ&RQGLWLRQV7UDɤF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULFVDQG5HVXOWV Design Concept
Analysis Findings
Analyses of each design concept using metrics
described above are summarized below.

Existing Conditions / No Build
7KLVLVWKHH[LVWLQJFRQ¿JXUDWLRQRQ3UXQHULGJH
Avenue between Pomeroy and Winchester, with
four vehicle travel lanes, parking on both sides
through a majority of the corridor, no bicycle
lanes, and outdated intersection designs.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
7UDႈF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULF Results
Vehicle Speeding
Narrowing the inside travel lanes from 12 feet wide to 11 feet wide and the outside lanes from 12 feet to 10 feet may reduce speeding by 1 to 6 mph on average. 4 Safety
This concept maintains four vehicle lanes and adds bicycle lanes which provide GHGLFDWHGURDGZD\VSDFHEXWSURYLGHVOLPLWHGVDIHW\FROOLVLRQUHGXFWLRQEHQH¿WV This concept may result in an increased level of street crossings due to removed SDUNLQJRQRQHVLGHRIWKHVWUHHW,QWHUVHFWLRQPRGL¿FDWLRQVZR XOGUHGXFHVSHHGV for turning vehicles and improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Pedestrian crossing distances at intersections would be slightly reduced, resulting in shorter crossing times.

Vehicle Congestion
No change. There would be one intersection that operates unacceptably under baseline conditions. This concept would restrict right turns on red at intersections if installed.

Parking Usage
This concept includes removing parking on one side of the street. Pruneridge Avenue and side streets have surplus parking capacity for people wishing to park on-street. Some block segments may be more heavily used, but neighboring segments and side streets have capacity. On a typical block, six out of ten parking spaces would be available.

Cost Total Estimated Cost - $6.94 Million. Pedestrian Improvements - $4.91 Million.

Bicycle Improvements - $2.02 Million.

6NHQH0LFKDHO³µ7UDɤF&DOPLQJ¶2Q$UWHULDO5RDGZD\V"´,QVW LWXWHRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ(QJLQHHUV&RPSHQGLXPRI7HFKQLFDO3DSHU V

Table 6. &RQFHSW7UDɤF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULFVDQG5HVXOWVConcept 1 - Four Lanes This concept will maintain four travel lanes
DQGSURYLGHEXɣHUHGELF\FOHODQHVFXUE
extensions and high-visibility crosswalks at
select intersections. Parking would be eliminated
on one side of the street under this concept.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
7UDႈF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULF Results
Vehicle Speeding
Converting four lanes to two lanes and narrowing travel lane width as included in Concepts 2 and 3 may reduce speeding by 3-6 mph on average. 5 Road UHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQVIURPIRXUODQHVWRWZRODQHVDOVRUHGXFHWKHVS HHGGLɣHUHQFH between vehicles, since vehicles that want to exceed the speed limit cannot pass drivers obeying the speed limit.
5 Safety
/DQHUHGXFWLRQDQGUHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQKDVWKHSRWHQWLDOWRUHGXFHF ROOLVLRQVE\
47%67KHURDGUHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQZRXOGFUHDWHDFRQVLVWHQWURDGZD\FRQ ¿JXUDWLRQ across the corridor while slowing vehicle speed and reducing collision risk and VHYHULW\,QWHUVHFWLRQPRGL¿FDWLRQVZRXOGUHGXFHVSHHGVIRUWXU QLQJYHKLFOHV and improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Pedestrian crossing distances at intersections would be slightly reduced, resulting in shorter crossing times. 3DLQWHGEXɣHUVDWGULYHZD\VLPSURYHVLJKWGLVWDQFHVDQGLQFUHDV HYLVLELOLW\IRU both vehicles and bicyclists.

Vehicle Congestion
Five intersections would operate unacceptably under baseline conditions. In addition, up to eight minutes would be added to the westbound direction of travel during the AM peak hour. It should be noted that diversion is not expected to increase congestion or cause level of service impacts to other streets. If installed, this concept would restrict right turns on red for vehicles.

Parking Usage /LPLWHGSDUNLQJUHPRYDOQHDUGULYHZD\VWRLQFUHDVHYLVLELOLW\ 2QDW\SLFDOEORFN eight out of ten parking spaces would be available.

Cost Total Estimated Costs - $7.22 Million. Pedestrian Improvements - $4.91 Million.

Bicycle Improvements - $2.30 Million
6NHQH0LFKDHO³µ7UDɤF&DOPLQJ¶2Q$UWHULDO5RDGZD\V"´,QVWL WXWHRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ(QJLQHHUV&RPSHQGLXPRI7HFKQLFDO3DSHUV

(YDOXDWLRQRI/DQH5HGXFWLRQ´5RDG'LHW³0HDVXUHVRQ&UDVKHV )+:$+57

Table 7. &RQFHSW7UDɤF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULFVDQG5HVXOWV Concept 2 - Two Lanes
This concept provides two travel lanes and a
center-turn lane with parking on both sides of
WKHVWUHHWEXɣHUHGELNHODQHVFDQRS\WUHHVDQG
curb-extensions and high-visibility crosswalks
at selection intersections. It is important to
note that this concept includes two eastbound
through lanes between San Tomas and
Saratoga, with the outermost lane becoming a
right-turn lane at the Saratoga intersection.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
7UDႈF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULF Results
Vehicle Speeding
Converting four lanes to two lanes and narrowing travel lane width as included in Concepts 2 and 3 may reduce speeding by 3-6 mph on average. 7 Road UHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQVIURPIRXUODQHVWRWZRODQHVDOVRUHGXFHWKHVS HHGGLɣHUHQFH between vehicles, since vehicles that want to exceed the speed limit cannot pass GULYHUVREH\LQJWKHVSHHGOLPLW7KLVFRQFHSWKHOSVSURPRWHWUD ɤFFDOPLQJE\ placing objects (vehicles) closer to the travel lane, which creates a visually smaller travel way and may result in additional speed reductions. 8 Safety
/DQHUHGXFWLRQVUHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQDQGELF\FOHSURWHFWLRQKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWR reduce collisions by 19-47%
9)+:$LVFXUUHQWO\VWXG\LQJVDIHW\EHQH¿WVIURP
separated facilities, which are likely to be higher due to the physical separation of vulnerable road users (to be completed in Fall 2022). The center-turn lane would LPSURYHGULYHZD\WXUQLQJDQGUHGXFHFROOLVLRQFRQÀLFWSRLQWVIR USHRSOHWXUQLQJ 3DLQWHGEXɣHUVDWGULYHZD\VLPSURYHVLJKWGLVWDQFHVDQGLQFUHDV HYLVLELOLW\IRU ERWKYHKLFOHVDQGELF\FOLVWV,QWHUVHFWLRQPRGL¿FDWLRQVZRXOGU HGXFHVSHHGVIRU turning vehicles and improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

Parking Usage /LPLWHGSDUNLQJUHPRYDOQHDUGULYHZD\VWRLQFUHDVHYLVLELOLW\ 2QDW\SLFDOEORFN eight out of ten parking spaces would be available.

Cost 7RWDO(VWLPDWHG&RVWV

0LOOLRQ3HGHVWULDQ,PSURYHPHQWV
0LOOLRQ
Bicycle Improvements - $3.37 Million. 6NHQH0LFKDHO³µ7UDɤF&DOPLQJ¶2Q$UWHULDO5RDGZD\V"´,QVWL WXWHRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ(QJLQHHUV&RPSHQGLXPRI7HFKQLFDO3DSHUV

.QDSS.7:HOFK-:LWPHU&RQYHUWLQJ)RXU/DQH8QGLYLGH G5RDGZD\VWRD7KUHH/DQH&URVV6HFWLRQ )DFWRUVWR&RQVLGHU

(YDOXDWLRQRI/DQH5HGXFWLRQ´5RDG'LHW³0HDVXUHVRQ&UDVKHV )+:$+57

Table 8. &RQFHSW7UDɤF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULFVDQG5HVXOWVConcept 3 - Parking Protected Separated Bikeway
Similar to Concept 2, this concept also
provides two travel lanes, a center-turn lane,
parking on both sides of the road, canopy
trees, and curb-extensions and high-visibility
crosswalks at select intersections. This concept
also includes two eastbound through-lanes
between San Tomas and Saratoga, with the
outermost lane becoming a right-turn lane at
WKH6DUDWRJDLQWHUVHFWLRQ7KHNH\GLɣHUHQFH
between Concepts 2 and 3 is an exchange
between the bicycle lane and the parking to
FUHDWHDµSDUNLQJSURWHFWHG¶ELNHODQHZKLFKLV
physically separated from moving vehicles. This
protection would extend to the intersections,
providing a protected intersection for bicyclists
and pedestrians. At full implementation, this
FRQFHSWZRXOGUHTXLUHPRGL¿FDWLRQRIVLJQDO
timings and incorporation of pedestrian and
bicycle intervals and bicycle signal heads.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
7UDႈF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULF Results
Vehicle Speeding
Narrowing vehicle travel lanes to ten feet will help reduce vehicle speeding by narrowing the visual appearance of the roadway. This may result in a reduction of average vehicle speeds between 3-6 mph.
9 Modifying the total number of lanes
to two will help to reduce excessive speeding as vehicles looking to speed will be unable to pass vehicles traveling at a reasonable speed. Additionally, the presence of on-street parking may help to reduce vehicle speeds, as the visual width of the roadway will appear more restricted than without the presence of parked vehicles.

Safety
Reducing the total number of lanes from four to two will reduce the total number RISRWHQWLDOFRQÀLFWSRLQWVEHWZHHQYHKLFOHVDVOHIWWXUQLQJYH KLFOHVDUHUHPRYHG IURPWKHÀRZRIWUDɤF7KHFRPELQDWLRQRIODQHUHGXFWLRQVUHFR Q¿JXUDWLRQ and bicycle protection has the potential to reduce collisions by up to 47%. 10 7KLVFRQFHSWZRXOGH[SHULHQFHVLPLODUVDIHW\EHQH¿WVWR&RQFHSWVDQGLQWKH sections where that design is applied. This includes improved sight distances, increased visibility for both vehicles and bicyclists, and reduced vehicle speeds WKURXJKLQWHUVHFWLRQPRGL¿FDWLRQV7KH)+:$LVFXUUHQWO\VWXG\L QJWKHDGGLWLRQDO VDIHW\EHQH¿WVRIVHSDUDWHGELF\FOHIDFLOLWLHVEH\RQGWUDGLWLRQ DO&ODVV,,ELNHODQHV Vehicle Congestion
This concept maintains vehicle capacity in the busiest section of the study area. 7KLVPDLQWDLQVDKLJKHUOHYHORIWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQVWKDQFRXOGEH DFKLHYHGWKURXJK Concepts 2 or 3. Three intersections would operate at unacceptable levels of service during the AM peak period under baseline conditions. Additionally, travel WLPHVXQGHUEDVHOLQHFRQGLWLRQVLQWKLVWUDɤFVFHQDULRZRXOGEH PLQXWHVLQ the peak AM and PM periods in the corresponding peak directions. This accounts for an additional 3.3 minutes in the AM and additional 0.7 minutes in the PM peak period. It should be noted that diversion is not expected to increase congestion or cause level of service impacts to other streets.

Parking Usage
This concept results in minimal parking removal around driveways and an additional seven parking spaces would need to be removed on the south side of Pruneridge Avenue east of Saratoga Avenue. This would provide a similar level of parking with eight out of ten parking spaces available on a typical block.

Cost TBD

6NHQH0LFKDHO³µ7UDɤF&DOPLQJ¶2Q$UWHULDO5RDGZD\V"´,QVW LWXWHRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ(QJLQHHUV&RPSHQGLXPRI7HFKQLFDO3DSHU V

.QDSS.7:HOFK-:LWPHU&RQYHUWLQJ)RXU/DQH8QGLYL GHG5RDGZD\VWRD7KUHH/DQH&URVV6HFWLRQ )DFWRUVWR&RQVLGHU

Table 9. &RQFHSW7UDɤF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULFVDQG5HVXOWV Concept 4 - Hybrid Option
This concept represents a blend of 4 travel
lanes and Concept 2 or 3. This concept
LQFOXGHVWZRGLVWLQFWGHVLJQYDULDWLRQV

• :LWK%XɣHUHG%LNH/DQHV
&RQFHSW
RU
• :LWK3DUNLQJ3URWHFWHG%LNH/DQHV
&RQFHSW

7KHURDGZRXOGEHUHFRQ¿JXUHGWRKDYHWZR
travel lanes and a center turn lane from Pomeroy
$YHQXHWR/XWKHU'ULYHDQGIURP+DUROG$YHQXH
to Winchester Boulevard. The roadway would
transition to a four lane section with a center
WXUQODQHEHWZHHQ/XWKHUDQG*DPEOLQ'ULYH
DQGPDLQWDLQWKLVFRQ¿JXUDWLRQWKURXJK+DUROG
Avenue. Preserving vehicle capacity at the critical
intersections of San Tomas Expressway and
Saratoga Boulevard maintains a higher level
RIWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQVWKDQZRXOGEHSRVVLEOH
with Concepts 2 or 3. This concept includes
many of the major improvements and design
concepts from Concepts 2 and 3, such as parking
on both sides of the road, canopy trees, curb
extensions, and high-visibility crosswalks at
selected intersections. This concept integrates
GHVLJQDQGWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQFRQVLGHUDWLRQV
from partner agencies. This concept may
UHTXLUHVLJQDOPRGL¿FDWLRQWRLQFRUSRUDWH
pedestrian and bicycle intervals and bicycle
signal heads if the parking protected bike
lane design variation is ultimately selected.

3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
3HGHVWULDQ,PSURYHPHQWV
:KLOHWKHUHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQRIURDGZD\VSDFH
between the curbs in Concepts 1, 2, and 3 may
require additional consideration, improvements
to pedestrian safety along the corridor can
be implemented with little to no impact while
SURYLGLQJDVXEVWDQWLDODQGLPPHGLDWHEHQH¿W
WRORFDOUHVLGHQWV7KH&LW\WHDPLGHQWL¿HG
intersections along the corridor to provide
low-cost pedestrian safety improvements
as shown below. These include enhanced
pedestrian crossing markings, improved right-
turn slip lanes, and pedestrian countdown
timers / Accessible Pedestrian Signals.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Tool Name Icon Example Description
Pedestrian Crossing Sign
$OHUWPRWRULVWVWRWKHSUHVHQFHRIDPDUNHGFURVVZDONZLWKRXWD WUDɤF signal. They can be placed parallel to or in advance of a crosswalk, and are particularly useful in locations where a crosswalk may not be expected by motorists.
6WDQGDUG&URVVZDON
0DUNLQJ
Use marking patterns of two parallel lines to increase yielding behavior and deter encroachment into the crosswalk.
$GYDQFH<LHOG6WRS/LQHV
These inform motorists of the correct position to wait for pedestrians at marked crossings. They are used in advance of stop signs or signalized crossings.
$'$&XUE5DPS
Provide a transition between the sidewalk and roadway crossings. They provide universal access for all users including pedestrians using wheeled mobility devices, small children, adults pushing strollers, and people with luggage.

Figure 11. Pedestrian Crossing Improvement Tools
9LVXDO/HJHQGIRU,PSURYHPHQWV
The following pedestrian recommendations
ZHUHVHOHFWHGXVLQJWKHWRROVLGHQWL¿HGLQ6DQWD
Clara's Pedestrian Master Plan. This visual
glossary shows the icons that represent the
UHFRPPHQGDWLRQVLGHQWL¿HGDWLQWHUVHFWLRQV
on the following pages. The glossary includes
an example image and short description.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Tool Name Icon Example Description
Curb Radius Reduction
Are extensions of the sidewalk and curb at the corners of intersections.

They shorten the roadway crossing distance and result in cars turning more slowly.
,PSURYHG5LJKW7XUQ6OLS
/DQH
Shortening the turn radius, requiring vehicles to turn more slowly, or removing slip lane entirely. Might include installing pedestrian refuge islands and marked pedestrian crossings so that people are clearly visible to oncoming drivers.

Countdown Timer /
Accessible Pedestrian
6LJQDOV
$36

Countdown timers indicate pedestrian walk phase and remaining time to cross at signalized intersections. APS devices communicate information DERXWWKH:$/.DQG'21¶7:$/.LQWHUYDOVLQQRQYLVXDOIRUPDWV WR pedestrians who are visually impaired or have low vision. 7UDɤF6WXG\
Collect 8-hours of vehicle counts, pedestrian crossings, and travel speeds and determine if stop signs, signals or beacons should be installed with marked crosswalks.
11111111111
: l'/11
f : f r+
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Curb Radius
Reduction
Timer
X2
X
X2
Extension
Standard
Crosswalk
Advance
Stop Lines
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
X
Standard
Crosswalk
Advance
Stop Lines
ADA
Curb Ramp
X4
X4
Curb Radius
Reduction
ADA
Pedestrian
Signal
X8
Countdown Leading Pedestrian
X2
Curb Radius
Reduction
X3
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
Curb Radius
Reduction
Standard
Crosswalk
Advance
Stop Lines
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
X
Curb Radius
Reduction
Curb Radius
Reduction
Recommend
Traffic Study
X6
Countdown
Timer
Timer
Pomeroy Avenue
Cronin Drive
Burnett Avenue
Hayes Avenue
Woodhams Road
Redwood Avenue
Cedar Way
X2
X2
X
C
bR d i
X
C
bR d iADA
Curb Ramp
X4
Pomeroy Avenue
Cronin Drive
e u n e v A t t e n r u B
e u n e v A s e y a H
d a o R s m a h d o o W
Redwood Avenue
y a W r a d e C
5 6 7
1 2
3 4
Eisenhower Elementary School
Maywood Park
Figure 12. Pruneridge Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Map – Segment 1 .J
a
0 0
0 0
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Kiely Boulevard
Luther Drive
Tanoak Drive
San Tomas Expy
Saratoga Avenue
X4
Curb Radius
Reduction
X8
Countdown
Timer
X4
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
Advance
Stop Lines
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
Advance
Stop Lines
ADA
Curb Ramp
X4
Improved
Right-Turn Slip Lane
X16
ADA
Curb Ramp
X4
Advance Yield/
Stop Lines
X8
Countdown
Timer
X4
Pedestrian
Crossing Sign
X2
Improved
Right-Turn Slip Lane
X2
Advance Yield/
Stop Lines
X8
Countdown
Timer
X2
Pedestrian
Crossing Sign
X2 X2
Cb Rd i
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb R d i Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb R d iStandard
Crosswalk
Standard
Crosswalk
Kiely Boulevard
Luther Drive
Tanoak Drive
San Tomas Expy
Saratoga Avenue8 9 10 11 12
Requires
coordination
with Santa
Clara County
Figure 13. Pruneridge Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Map – Segment 2 ~ @ ~ ~ ~ ~ i, @
"
@
-- -- -- - -- Ci) @ Ci) @ @w @ w - -- -- -- -@
-
ao 0 0 ao a
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Harold Avenue
Cypress Avenue
Kerry Drive
Henry Avenue/Los Padres Boulevard
Jill Avenue
Winchester Boulevard
ADA
Curb Ramp
X8
Countdown
Timer
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
ADA
Curb Ramp
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
Improved
Right-Turn Slip Lane
X8
Countdown
Timer
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2X2
ADA
Curb Ramp
X4
X2 X2
X2
Advance
Stop Lines
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb Rd i
Standard
Crosswalk
X2
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb R d i
X2
Advance
Stop Lines
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb Rd i
Standard
Crosswalk
X2
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb Rd i
Recommend
Traffic Study
X2
Advance
Stop Lines
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb R d i
Standard
Crosswalk
X2
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb R d i
Harold Avenue
Cypress Avenue
Kerry Drive
Henry Avenue
Jill Avenue
Winchester Blvd
Los Padres Blvd
Sutter Avenue
13 14 15 16 17 18
Requires
coordination
with San Jose
Requires
coordination
with San Jose
Requires
coordination
with San Jose
Figure 14. Pruneridge Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Map – Segment 3 ~
.
~ ~ (f) ~ (f) ®
~
~ ~
" - - - - - - -- - -®) § ®) § § ®) §
-- - -- - - - - -
0 a 0 0 a
Community
Engagement

04. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, most public outreach and engagement was conducted virtually, which allowed
for continued engagement with the community while
promoting public health and safety. This allowed the
project to continue moving forward during shelter-in-place orders and resulted in a higher level of engagement than typically received with in-person focused engagement.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
Engagement Strategies
3URMHFW:HEVLWH
The City of Santa Clara hosted the project
website for the Plan and provided information
about the project throughout the life of the study.

This website was a key landing page for residents
looking for project information, including project
documents, public event details, and recordings
of public workshops. The website also provided
an opportunity to submit feedback directly to
the project throughout the life of the project,
including through online surveys. The project
website was launched in December 2020.
(www.SantaClaraCA.gov/PruneridgeAvePlan)
Ra,Of'l'no.11-.-~q,i, wMl~J;l1.3icr!xlib'~Ww~lJ~kll'OCPa'EillbNlllclll (...,.,.,,.. ,,,, Na..,. .. l,{,'"--JU..oo-ir, ,""'-11..,, t1itll!llte .. s-d 11ieCitrol:5a'dClal Q, ,~. -•- ,.,.,_.,,.._u, ..

SER\I ICES OUR CITY RECREATION & COMMUNITY BUS IN ESS & O:EYELOPM!:.NT I WANT TO lrnlf 1t ~l(l,._..
{)ul-1qrPrntJrm"'
l1ar><.p:>1U1,anAl...,~,.,!'o6,o-~
lJJ,idal,:,
W.,t h~fkrul, -v.s,d[II,..

1...,. JTu,..ct
Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan
Online Community Meetings #5 and #6
Please jorl us IOf the fast roond of orwie comnu»ty meetings fot lhe Prunendgc A ... enuc Complete Streets Pian. Thcst! meetir'lgl WIii preMirt the rfMiw,d c:oncepe pans. kif Improving Walkng and blcydtng aJong Pruner1dg!- AYenUe betwet!n P'omeroy Avenue and W1nche!5-ter Boolevard ~sea on COfMIUnlty inpUI and axrvnerits reo!IV'ed !tom the onllnl! :survey Cancepl plan,. lnclade op!IOnS tor ll!fflOlo'lr>g p:111Lir,g tane reductions:, ot 10 1eta1n cxl5tlng r.nes. 1n add tlon, the- results of the tralfic: ~s ror all ttM3 conccp1, WIii be stiaced v.iJ'l ltie commc.mlly. Flnal'y, ~ wfD be a:st.ed to soect Iha prererenu lot each cooccpl through a ranked choial- VOi.ct
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG
:LQFKHVWHU%OYG
6DQ7RPDV([SZ\
/DZUHQFH([SZ\
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH
3RPHUR\$YH
+RPHVWHDG5G
/RV3DGUHV%OYG
)RUEHV$YH
+HGGLQJ
6W ,QWHUVWDWH
,QWHUVWDWH
Apple
Campus
Valley
Fair
0RQURH6W
Agilent
Campus
Kaiser
Hospital
/D+HUUDQ
'U
&DODED]DV&UHHN
6DUDWRJD$YH
1HZKDOO6W
6FRWW%OYG
%HOORP\6W
0DUNHW6W
,QW
HUV
W
Apple
Campus
&DODED]DV &
&
3URMHFWFRUULGRU
1RWLILFDWLRQIO\HUERXQGDU\
&LW\RI6DQ-RVH
&LW\RI&XSHUWLQR
/(*(1'
Map 5. 0DLOHU1RWL¿FDWLRQ%RXQGDULHVCommunity Survey
The project included an online community
survey intended to gather feedback and
input from the public to identify barriers and
recommendations for multimodal improvements
along the corridor. The City team sent a total
of 23,238 notices to UHVLGHQWVZLWKLQ
½ mile of the corridor (as shown in Map
5) in order to generate feedback directly from
local residents and those who use the corridor
most frequently for each round of outreach. The
online survey was available from 2/12/2021 to
5/8/2021 and generated 678 responses. Two
additional online surveys were created to gather
FRPPXQLW\IHHGEDFNVSHFL¿FDOO\RQWKHGUDIW
and revised corridor concepts. The second online
survey sought feedback on the draft corridor
concepts. The second survey was available
between September 2021 and January 2022. The
survey received 352 responses. The third survey
asked respondents to prioritize their preferences
on the revised corridor concepts. This survey
had a total of 144 completed responses. The
survey ran from February 2022 - March 2022
and was re-issued on May 23, 2022 and ran
through June 28, 2022 to gather additional
public feedback. This additional survey captured
188 total responses. A full analysis of the
survey results is available in Appendix B.

I=
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
6WDNHKROGHU,QWHUYLHZV
The City team conducted multiple interviews
with a diverse group of stakeholders to
understand their mobility needs along the
corridor. Each meeting helped the City team
identify known issues and opportunities
along the corridor as well as the diverse needs
of project stakeholders. Interviews were
FRQGXFWHGZLWKWKHIROORZLQJVWDNHKROGHUV

•O l d Q u a d R e s i d e n t s A s s o c i a t i o n - March 29, 2021
• Apple - March 29, 2021
• Santa Clara County Public Health
Department (SCCPHD) - April 1, 2021
•S i l i c o n V a l l e y B i c y c l e C o a l i t i o n (SVBC) - April 1, 2021
• 6DQWD&ODUD8QL¿HG6FKRRO'LVWULFW
CUSD - April 21, 2021
6WDNHKROGHULQWHUYLHZVXPPDULHV
6DQWD&ODUD8QL¿HG6FKRRO'LVWULFW
&86'

3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHGRHVQRWKDYHDVLJQL¿FDQW
number of students crossing for school purposes
because this road acts as a boundary for
(LVHQKRZHU(OHPHQWDU\VFKRRO&86'VWDɣ
was supportive of additional bicycle facilities
and improved safety on routes to school.

The Old Quad Residents Association
This association represents residents of
WKHµ2OG4XDG¶QHLJKERUKRRGLQWKHKHDUW
of the City of Santa Clara. In general,
this group was supportive of increased
multimodal connections into downtown
Santa Clara and providing an east-west
bicycle facility south of Homestead Road.

Santa Clara County Public Health
Department (SCCPHD)
6WDɣIURPWKH6&&3+'ZHUHVXSSRUWLYHRI
safety improvements and creating comfortable
alternative transportation facilities to encourage
PRUHELF\FOLQJDQGZDONLQJ6&&3+'VWDɣ
highlighted the need for improved crossings
for children, seniors, disabled individuals,
and those who otherwise can not drive.

Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition (SVBC)
7KH69%&LVDQRQSUR¿WRUJDQL]DWLRQIRFXVHG
on promoting and expanding the bicycle network
in San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties. SVBC
representatives expressed strong support for
creating protected bicycle facilities, expanding
the bicycle network, and implementing complete
streets strategies along Pruneridge Avenue.

Apple
$SSOHVWDɣVXSSRUWHGSURYLGLQJFRPIRUWDEOH
bicycle facilities along Pruneridge in order to
increase employee bicycle mode share and create
DVWURQJHDVWZHVWFRQQHFWLRQ6WDɣH[SUHVVHGD
desire for Pruneridge Avenue to connect to north/
south facilities and the larger bicycle network.

3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
Concept 2:

Two Lane Option 1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
Concept 4:

Hybrid Option
Concept 3:

Protected Bikeway Option
Concept 1:

Four Lane Option
No build:
existing conditions
Figure 15. BPAC Concept Preferences
The BPAC ranked their
preference of all
concepts presented,
results are highlighted
in Figure 15. The BPAC
showed a strong
SUHIHUHQFHIRUEXɣHUHG
bike lanes and a
continuous bicycle
facility.

Committee/Commission
DQG&RXQFLO0HHWLQJV
The City team met with the following
Committee/Commissions and the City
Council to provide project updates and
receive feedback and direction. In general,
Committee/Commission members participated
in online poll questions, asked clarifying
questions about the concept designs, and
provided verbal feedback. Meeting dates and
content provided are summarized below.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Committee (BPAC)
• 0DUFK - Alta presented during the
regularly scheduled March 22, 2021 BPAC
meeting. The purpose of this meeting
was to provide project information and
gather feedback on existing conditions
and known issues on the corridor.
• $XJXVW - Alta presented as part of a
regularly scheduled August 23, 2021 BPAC
meeting. At this meeting, the draft concepts
were presented to them and general comments
received focused on making the corridor
consistent with either end and enhancing
bicycle and pedestrian visibility at driveways
and throughout the design. Concept 2
received the highest level of support from the
&RPPLVVLRQ
IXOO\VXSSRUWHG&RQFHSW
2 and 38% supported with minor changes.
• -DQXDU\ - Alta presented to the BPAC
during the regular meeting on January 24,
2022. Alta presented a project overview and
updates as well as updated design concepts
based on previous public input. BPAC
members voted on updated project concepts
and provided general comments. Comments
focused on design considerations (trash can
pick-up locations, driveway visibility, etc.)
and ensuring that the movements of people
biking are predictable and visible for all
concepts. Concept 3 was ranked as the most
preferred concept by the Committee. See
image below for the full BPAC ranking.
• 0DUFK&LW\VWDɣSUHVHQWHGWR
the BPAC during the regular meeting on
0DUFK6WDɣVKDUHG&LW\&RXQFLO
comments provided at the March 8,
2022 Council meeting study session and
obtained additional BPAC feedback.
-
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
• 0D\ - Alta presented at a specially
held BPAC meeting on May 11, 2022. Alta
provided the Committee with information
about the most recent revisions to the
analysis based on public comments and
the newly developed Concept 4 Hybrid
Option. The Committee members provided
feedback on the revised analysis and hybrid
option. Ultimately the preferred option
VHOHFWHGE\%3$&ZDV&RQFHSW
7ZR/DQH
Option with Concept 4 ranking second.
• -XQH%3$&PHHWLQJ - Alta
presented the draft Pruneridge Complete
Streets Plan to the BPAC during the regular
meeting on June 27, 2022. The Committee
received a presentation on the plan and
design concepts. Following the presentation,
BPAC took an action to recommend that the
City Council adopt the Pruneridge Avenue
Complete Streets Plan and recommended
that the Council adopt Concept 4 with
WKHEXɣHUHGELNHODQHV
&RQFHSW

3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
Parks and Recreation Commission
Alta presented as part of a regularly scheduled
Parks & Recreation Commission meeting
RQ6HSWHPEHU*HQHUDOFRPPHQWV
included questions about the impact of designs
DQGSRWHQWLDOIRUFXWWKURXJKWUDɤFRQVLGH
streets. Concept 2 received the highest support
from the Commission with 60% voting in full
support or support with minor changes.

Youth Commission
Alta presented as part of a regularly scheduled
Youth Commission meeting on September
14, 2021. The Commission provided feedback
on the designs and were generally in
IDYRURI&RQFHSWDQG&RQFHSW*HQHUDO
comments included questions about next
steps and timeline for construction.

City Council Study Session
The City Council was presented with information
regarding the project on March 8, 2022. This
study session included an overview of the project
and what was completed to date. The Council
study session was informational in nature and
intended to provide Councilmembers with a
full review of technical analysis completed for
the design concepts. Councilmembers asked
questions and provided feedback regarding
VKRUWDQGORQJWHUPWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQDODQG
safety concerns as well as potential options for
implementation. The Council also heard public
comments on the project which were in favor of
PRUHWUDɤFFDOPLQJDQGDVLQJOHODQHDORQJZLWK
a general concern regarding potential congestion.
3RSXS(YHQWV
The City team conducted two pop-up style events
during the project. These events provided an
opportunity to meet residents where they are
and generate additional project feedback and
awareness of the project. Both pop-up events
included information booths with a welcome
board that provided an overview of the project
and a QR code linked to the project website.

Each of the four corridor alternatives (including
existing) had a board, and visitors could walk
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
around the booth and receive an explanation
RIHDFKFRQFHSWDQGWKHGLɣHUHQFHVEHWZHHQ
them. Residents then had the opportunity to
vote for which alternative was their preference.
iPads were also available for residents to
take the Concept Alternative Survey.

Celebrate Santa Clara - August 21, 2021
Celebrate Santa Clara was an outdoor
community event held in Santa Clara Central
Park with food, entertainment, and booths from
local organizations and City departments. The
Public Works Department hosted a booth for
the Pruneridge Avenue Complete Street Study.

The City team interacted with 45 residents
during the afternoon. Concepts 2 and 3 received
the most support from residents who voted
on the concept designs during the event.

Christmas Tree Lighting - December 3, 2021
This outdoor event featured performances
from local groups, food, pictures with Santa, a
snow park, and booths from local organizations
and City departments. The Public Works
Department hosted a booth for the Pruneridge
Avenue Complete Streets Study which provided
a welcome board, sign-in sheet, comment
cards, and project information virtually
and through paper handouts. The City team
interacted with approximately 86 residents
during the event. Concept 3 received the most
support from residents during the event.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
&RPPXQLW\:RUNVKRSV
Community workshops provide an opportunity
to meet directly with residents to provide
information, identify existing issues, and gather
feedback on project concepts. The project
included three distinct phases of workshops
with two workshops at various times to allow
for increased participation. One workshop was
held on a weekday evening and one workshop
was held on a Saturday afternoon. Information
shared at each workshop was the same for each
round. Community workshops were promoted
through postcards mailed to 7,746 mailing
addresses within ½ mile of the corridor for
each of the three rounds (23,238 total notices
mailed); social media posts from the City,
stakeholders, and community partners; the City
0DQDJHU¶V%ORJ
DQGWKHSURMHFWZHEVLWHZKLFK
included a link for registration to the community
workshops. Meeting dates, times, and general
WKHPHVIRUHDFKURXQGDUHLGHQWL¿HGEHORZVHH
Appendix CWRYLHZSRVWFDUGQRWL¿FDWLRQV
sign-in sheets, and materials provided.

Phase 1 - Workshops 1 & 2
Participants in Phase 1 workshops received
information about the project and were
provided with an opportunity to voice concerns
and issues experienced along the corridor.
• :RUNVKRS had a total of 92 participants
and was held virtually on Zoom at 7pm on
February 25th, 2021. There were a total
of 90 comments provided through chat
or video conference at the meeting.
• :RUNVKRS had a total of 28 participants
who submitted 40 comments and suggestions
through the chat or video conference
meeting functions. This meeting occurred
at 1 pm on February 27, 2021 on Zoom.

Phase 2 - Workshops 3 & 4
Phase 2 workshops included initial
conceptual designs for Concept 1, 2, and

3. Attendees were provided with existing
condition data about the corridor and
given an overview of the draft conceptual
designs. Participants were asked to rank the
conceptual designs and provide feedback.
• :RUNVKRS had a total of 62 participants
and was held virtually on Zoom at 6pm
on July 22, 2021. There were a total of 103
comments made by residents through the
Zoom chat and video conference functions.
• :RUNVKRS had a total of 17 participants
and was held virtually on Zoom at 1pm
on July 24, 2021. There were a total of
31 comments received at this meeting
through the chat and video conference.

Phase 3 - Workshops 5, 6 & 7
3KDVHZRUNVKRSVIRFXVHGRQUH¿QLQJWKH
conceptual designs by gathering feedback
from the community. Workshops 5 and
SURYLGHGSDUWLFLSDQWVZLWK¿QDOGHVLJQ
concepts and the technical analysis related
to Concepts 1, 2, and 3. Concept 4 was
introduced to the public at Workshop 7.
• :RUNVKRShad a total of 61 participants
and was held virtually on Zoom at 6pm
on February 9, 2022. There were a total
of 80 comments provided through chat
or video conference at the meeting.
• :RUNVKRS had a total of 20 participants
and was held virtually on Zoom at 1pm on
Saturday, February 12, 2022. There was
a total of 25 comments provided through
chat or video conference at the meeting.
• :RUNVKRS had a total of 44 participants
and was held virtually on Zoom at 6pm on
May 12, 2022. Participants provided a total
of 40 comments and suggestions through
the chat or video conference functions.
• I mprv \~ bi1,.1·d.: 1Jpti1JtU1
• Pre$i'.f\~ on ~ tret'I ri:'lrl:lnJ
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
Additional Outreach Strategies
In addition to the engagement events detailed
above, the City team also used a combination
of promotional strategies to increase awareness
of and participation with the Plan. Events,
surveys, and other items were promoted using
WKHSURMHFWZHEVLWHWKH&LW\0DQDJHU¶V%ORJ
social media posts on Facebook, Nextdoor, and
Twitter, and “Inside Santa Clara” articles. The
City provided a dedicated phone number and
email address for the project. The City also
emailed everyone who signed up to receive
QRWL¿FDWLRQVDERXWWKHSURMHFWHYHU\WLPHQHZ
information or materials were posted on the
project website including meeting details.

The City also posted 20 street signs along the
corridor to direct people to the project website.

SPEED
LIMIT
35 3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
Figure 16. Workshop 1 & 2 - Pruneridge Destination Results3KDVH2XWUHDFK6XPPDU\)LQGLQJV Travel trends / preferences summary
The City team asked respondents about their
typical destinations when traveling along
Pruneridge Avenue and developed a word cloud
from the responses. The size of each word
indicates the frequency it was used with the
largest words below being used most often by
respondents. The most common responses
were traveling to and from home and work.

In order to gain a deeper understanding of how
Pruneridge Avenue is used and what destinations
the road provides access to, residents were
asked to identify their top locations that they
use Pruneridge Avenue to access. The combined
feedback from both Phase 1 workshops are
shown in Figure 16 and 17. Many of the responses
came from local residents and those who work
LQWKHDUHD7KHPRVWFRPPRQO\LGHQWL¿HG
phrases were “Home”, “Work”, and “Everywhere”.

Based on this feedback, it is apparent that
Pruneridge Avenue serves many purposes
for the local community and will continue to
support these uses now and in the future.
+RPH
:RUN

VKRSSLQJ
ZDON
(YHU\ZKHUH

ODZUHQFH
VFKRRO
&RPPXWH
H[HUFLVH
%LNH
/LEUDU\
3DUN
.DLVHU
3DUNV
/XFN\V
IUHHZD\

FXSHUWLQR
/XFN\
*XDGDOXSH7UDLO
$LUSRUWFRPPXQLW\
+LJKZD\V
ELNLQJ
7UDQVLW

HUUDQGV

UHVWDXUDQWV
6WRUH
$SSOH
&KXUFK
.LHO\
WUDLO
)ULHQGV

GRFWRUV
0DOO
6NHOHWRQV
+RVSLWDO
6XQQ\YDOH
6DQ7RPDV
WUDYHOWRZRUN
'RZQWRZQ6DQ-RVH6DQ-RVH
9DOOH\IDLU
*URFHU\VWRUH
*URFHU\DQGJDVVWDWLRQ
/DZUHQFH&DU
NDLVHUGRZQWRZQZRUNV
&KLQD'HOLJKW
ZDONLQJWRORFDOSDUNV
*HWWR6DQ7RPDV
/XFN\VPDUNHW&DUO
V-U&KLQ
7R6-&
WRJHWWRWKHEDVFRPLQWHUFKDQ
VKRSSLQJH[FHULVH
7RIUHHZD\
(OGHUO\SDUHQWVKRPHGDLO\DQG
6KRSLQJDQGH[HUFLVH
QHLJKERUKRRGZDONJRWR6DQWD
+RPH9LVLWIDPLO\JHWRXWRI
DFFHVVWRH[SUHVVZD\V
ELNLQJWRELNHWUDLOV
7R/DZUHQFH7RFRPPXWHWR0W
%LNHWRZRUN
KRPHOLEUDU\VKRSSLQJSDUN
+RPHZRUNIDPLO\
+RPHDQGIRUHVWSDUNFDEDQDFO
)LUHVWDWLRQ
5RVH*DUGHQRU6DQWDQD5RZ
6DQWDQDURZ
IUHHZD\LQWHUFKDQJHDW%DVFRP
ZRUNJURFHU\ZDON
/DZUHQFH6DQ7RPDV
&DOWUDLQVWDWLRQ
6ZLPFOXEDQGKRPH
VWRUHZRUNVKRSSLQJ
/RYHRQRW
KRPHZRUNHYHU\ZKHUH
2IILFH'D\FDUH
7R6DQ-RVHGRZQWRZQ
*UDYH\DUG
/DZUHQFHH[SUHVVZD\
ZDONLQJIRUH[HUFLVH
$FFHVVIUHHZD\
3RVWRIILFH
/DZUHQFHH[SUHVVZD\WR/\QEURR
6DQ7RPDV$TXLQRWUDLO
ELNLQJIRUH[HUFLVH
$YRLGVWHYHQVFUHHN
'DGKRXVH
YLVLWIULHQGV
LFHULQN&XSHUWLQR
OLYHRQWKHVWUHHW
YLVLWLQJUHODWLYHV
/DXUHQFHH[SUHVVZD\
+RPHVFKRROZRUNVKRSSLQJ
([HUFLVHZRUN/LYHRQ3UXQHULGJH 6KRSSLQJ6DQWDQDURZ KRPHZRUNVKRSSLQJ
.DLVHU6DQWD&ODUD
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
Figure 17. Workshop 1 and 2 - Visioning Results
Cal slow down
tra ic speeds 1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
educe tra ic
congestion
pro e
bicycling options
pro e walking
conditions
Preser e on street
parking
Figure 18. What should Pruneridge’s priorities be? (ranking)Community priorities summary The community ranked their priorities for the
FRUULGRUDQGLGHQWL¿HGFDOPLQJWUDɤFVSHHGV
as their top priority, as shown to the right.
%LNH
FRPPXQLW\
%LNLQJ
VDIH
%LNHODQHV3DUNLQJ
ODQHV

XQFKDQJHGUHVLGHQWLDO
TXLHW

ELNHODQHV
VORZHU
VDIHELNHODQHV &DUV
&DOPODQHV
6ORZHUWUDIILF
VORZ0RUHODQHV
JUHHQ
VDIHU
/HVVWUDIILF
%LNHIULHQGO\
GLHWODQHV
ODQHV
PDWFKLQJDFURVVYDOOH\
5HGXFHGVSHHG
JUHHQELNHODQHV
0RUHWUDIILF
1RWFRQJHVWHG 7ROOURDG
(TXLWDEOH
3HGHVWULDQVDIHW\
DVLV
PRGHUQ
XQFKDQJHG
ODQHV
.HHSODQHV
QRWWKHPDLQZD\LQWRDSSOH
<HVXQFKDQJHG
UHVLGHQWSDUNLQJ

OLYDEOH

QRJULGORFN
&DOPHUWUDIILF6DIHDQGHDV\
NHHSODQHVHDV\DFFHVVWRIU
+RPHRZQHU
VKDYHULJKWV
VDIHO\FURVVLQJWKHVWUHHW
QRGLHW
ELNHFURVVZDONVUHVLGHQWLDO
TXLHWFDOP
7XUQLQJODQH
VPDUWOLJKWVWRPDNHFDUWUDII )ULHQGO\WRUHVLGHQWV

XQSROOXWHG
1RWMXVWIRUFDUV
&RPSOHWH6WUHHWVVDIHDQGLQY
TXLHWOHVVWUDIILFVDIHWRZ
IULHQGO\
)RUSHRSOH
QREDFNXSVRQWR/DZUHQFH

JHQWHHO
NHHSDOOIRXUODQHV
)RUSHRSOHQRWIRUFDUV
WZRODQHVVDIHUHVLGHQWLDO
VDIHELF\FOLQJIULHQGO\
*UHHQHU\ EXVFRQQHFWLRQIURP$SSOHWR%
ORFDO
3XWELNHVLQ,62/$7('SDWKDZD
6PRRWKWUDIILFIORZ
6LGHZDON
SURWHFWHGELNHODQHV
VDIHIORZVFDOPLQJ
6DIHW\
VDIHELNHZD\
5RDGGLHW
ZHOFRPHSHGVELNHV
VDIHIULHQGO\JUHHQ
%LNDEOH
FRQQHFWLYLW\ELF\FOHVFDOP
6DIHUIRUSUHGHVWULDQV 6DIHW\
VTXDUHRIIVWUHHWFRUQHUVWRV
6DIHUFRPPXWHVORZHUWUDIILF
'RQ
WUHVWULFWSDUNLQJ
QREDFNHGXSWUDIILF
IRXU
%LF\FOHFRUULGRU
6\QFKURQL]HG
)DPLO\IULHQGO\
%LNHODQHVVDIH
FDOPHU
,PSURYHVDIHW\DQGFRQQHFWLYLW
ELF\FOHZDONLQJIULHQGO\
%LNHURXWH
/HDYHLWDORQH
0RUHJUHHQHU\
7UDIILFIORZ
5RDGGLHW

IORZLQJ

SHDFHIXO
IRXUODQHV
7UDIILFODZHQIRUFHPHQW
&DU
3ROLFHSUHVHQFH

ORZVSHHGV
&DUIRFXVHG
6ORZWKHWUDIILFGRZQQRWWR

FRPSOHWH
&RQYHQLHQWFRPPXWH
'ULYHUIULHQGO\
SDUNZD\
6WUHVVIUHH
0RYLQJDZD\

KRPHRZQHUV
5HGXFHWUDIILF
OHVVSROOXWLRQ
1RFKDQJH
%LNH/DQH&RUULGRU
QRSDUNLQJ URRPIRUELNHV
1RPHUJLQJODQHV
1RELNHODQH
(DV\JRLQJ
ELNHODQH
&RRUGLQDWHGVLJQDOV
5HOD[LQJ
)DPLO\
3HGHVWULDQIULHQGO\ %LNHODQHFRUULGRU FRQYHQLHQW
9LVLRQ
In order to gain a better understanding
o
f the long-term community vision
for the corridor, the City team asked
respondents to identify one to three words
which come to mind when thinking of
the future of Pruneridge Avenue. Some
RIWKHPRVWFRPPRQSKUDVHVLGHQWL¿HG
for the future of Pruneridge include
µ6DIH¶µ%LNH/DQHV¶DQGµSDUNLQJ¶DV
shown in the word-clouds to the right.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
Figure 19. Concepts 1 through 3 Feedback3KDVH2XWUHDFK6XPPDU\)LQGLQJV The City team brought initial designs for
Concept 1, 2, and 3 to the public for their
input in July, 2021. Meeting attendees were
asked to provide their support for or against
each design concept and provide general
comments on the designs. Feedback from the
SXEOLFKHOSHGWRVKDSHWKH¿QDOWKUHHFRQFHSWV
and are summarized below. Please refer to
Appendix B for all survey responses.

Concept 1: Four Lane Option
The combined results of the Round 2
workshops indicate that approximately 47%
of respondents did not support this concept
with just 38% of respondents supporting this
concept either fully or with minor changes.

Concept 2: Two Lane Option
Approximately 64% of survey respondents
indicated that they support this concept
either fully or with minor changes.

Concept 3: Parking Protected Option
Through both community workshops,
approximately 51% of respondents supported
Concept 3 either fully or with minor changes.
$GGLWLRQDOIHHGEDFN
The public also expressed concerns
regarding existing pedestrian and bicycle
comfort and safety needs in addition to the
potential impacts on parking, congestion,
and bicycle & pedestrian comfort from
the concept designs. A full summary of
feedback is provided in Appendix B.

Do not support
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Needs major
changes
Support with
minor changes
Full support
Concept 1 Concept 2 Concept 3
40%
31%
40%
20%
16%
11%
17%
18%
14%
23%
35%
35%
■ ■ ■
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
2135 4 1
1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice
Concept 2:

Two Lane 24 2 23 24 4 12 1
Concept 1:

Four Lane
13 1 4 523 1
No Build 23 115
Concept 3:

Parking Protected
34 1223 2 21 2
Figure 20. Workshops 5 and 6 Combined Concept Ranking Preferences3KDVH2XWUHDFK6XPPDU\)LQGLQJV During Workshops 5 & 6, the City team engaged
with meeting attendees regarding revised
design concepts, based on community feedback.

Meeting attendees were asked to rank each
concept based on which they would most like
to see implemented. The combined results from
both workshops are presented in Figure 20.

Concept 1 feedback
)RXUODQHVZDVLGHQWL¿HGDVWKHWKLUG
or fourth choice by the majority of
workshop attendees (57%).

Concept 2 feedback
7ZR/DQHVUHFHLYHGRIYRWHVIURP
UHVSRQGHQWVDVWKHLU¿UVWRUVHFRQGFKRLFH
Concept 3 feedback
Parking Protected was selected as the
top choice by the highest number of
respondents (38%). Furthermore, a
majority of respondents (61%) selected this
concept as their top one or two options.

No Build feedback
The rankings from Phase 3 workshops highlight
WKDWWKHH[LVWLQJRUµ1R%XLOG¶RSWLRQLVWKH
last choice for a majority of respondents. In
Phase 3 43-57% of respondents indicated
that this option was their last choice.
2135 4 1
1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice 5th Choice
Concept 2:

Two Lane
43 4 1 35
No Build 3 13 4 43
Concept 3:

Parking Protected
1 22 13 5
Concept 4:

Hybrid 4 35 43 41 3
Concept 1:

Four Lane 4 3 1 3
Figure 21. Workshop 7 Concept Ranking
- ~~------,-.
• •
- -------.
■ ~~---,-------
• •
•
•
•
•

3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
Concept 4 feedback
During Community Workshop 7, attendees
were asked to rank the design concepts once
again, including the hybrid option Concept

4. The results of this ranking are highlighted
in Figure 21. This ranking highlights that
&RQFHSWZDVVHOHFWHGDVWKH¿UVWFKRLFHIRU
the largest portion of respondents (43%) and
Concept 4 was selected as the second choice
by the largest number of respondents (35%).

Additional feedback
Workshop attendees provided additional
feedback during the meeting on a variety of
items regarding the project including potential
YHKLFOHFRQJHVWLRQEHQH¿WVWRELF\FOHFRPIRUW
vehicle speeding impacts, and potential for
mixing concept alternatives. All comments
DUHUHÀHFWHGLQWKH&RPPHQW6XPPDU\
Spreadsheet included in $SSHQGL[%
Community Survey Results
7KH¿QDOFRPPXQLW\VXUYH\ZDVDYDLODEOH
online from May 23 through June 28,
2022. The results of this survey indicate
a strong preference for redesigning the
roadway, with 36% of respondents selecting
&RQFHSW
3DUNLQJ3URWHFWHG2SWLRQDV
their preferred concept and 37% selecting
&RQFHSW
7ZR/DQH2SWLRQDVWKHLUVHFRQG
most preferred concept. The No Build option
received nearly 54% of last place votes.

Figure 22. Final Community Preference Survey Results
1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice 5th Choice
11 2
32 22 3
23 4
1 15
3 22
5 5
141
22 11
13 4422
1 11 2
13 3
11 54 3
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Concept 4: Hybrid
Concept 3: Parking Protected
Concept 2: Two Lane
Concept 1: Four Lane
xisting No Build
I
--~ I
I
- -----,--
1 ■ ■
r
■ ■
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD

04. Community Engagement
The City provided residents multiple
opportunities to engage with the project
throughout the 18 month duration. Table 10
categorizes all survey responses, community
workshop polls, and emails and phone calls
received throughout the project into either
supporting a change or not supporting a change.

On average, 74% of workshop attendees, 52% of
survey responses, and 38% of emails and phone
calls supported a changed design on the corridor.

A majority of responses received throughout
the project (55.4%) indicate support for
implementing a redesign concept on the corridor.

Outreach Activity Total
Responses
Supports No Change Supports Change
Responses Percentage Responses Percentage
:RUNVKRS 13 0 34 26% 96 74%
:RUNVKRS 12 0 0% 12 100%
:RUNVKRS 39 9 23% 30 77%
:RUNVKRS 15 5 33% 10 67%
:RUNVKRS 23 9 39% 14 61%
All Workshops

2QOLQH6XUYH\ 659 371 56% 288 44%
2QOLQH6XUYH\ 36 8 22% 28 78%
2QOLQH6XUYH\ 288 44 23% 144 77%
All Online Surveys

Total Email/Phone Calls 64 40 63% 24 38%
Total
Table 10. Consolidated Corridor Rankings
Implementation

05. The implementation guide provides a potential roadmap for full project implementation in order to provide
decision makers with considerations for implementation
DQGSKDVLQJRIWKH¿QDOSURMHFW
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD 5 ple entation
Cost Based Alternatives
The implementation of bicycle and pedestrian
projects may be piloted prior to full
LPSOHPHQWDWLRQZLWKSHUPDQHQW¿[WXUHV7KH
low-cost option below includes a possible pilot
project type implementation, to be evaluated at
a later date. This provides the opportunity to
reassess the need for and use of low-stress bicycle
and pedestrian facilities along the corridor.
/RZ3DLQW3RVW
Reducing the time to implementation, this
low-cost strategy is focused on providing
meaningful improvements using low-cost
materials and construction methods. This option
would implement the pedestrian improvements
LGHQWL¿HGLQ)LJXUHVZKLOHXVLQJSDLQW
where feasible. This allows for improvements
such as bulb-outs to be implemented quickly
with minimal maintenance requirements
and without reconstructing portions of the
intersection. The recommended pedestrian
improvements in the low-cost concept
accounts for approximately $1,768,000.

In order to reduce time to implementation
DQGRYHUDOOFRVWEXɣHUHGELF\FOHODQHV
&ODVV
II) and separated bikeway (Class IV) may be
implemented using a combination of paint and
WUDɤFGHOLQHDWRUV7KHFRVWRILPSOHPHQWDWLRQ
for this method ranges from $4.07 to
$4.26 million (see Table 11).

Concept 1, 2, or 4 Concept 3 or 4
Low-Cost (Quick-Build) $4.07 Million $ 4.26 Million
High-Cost (Long-Term) $ 7.22 Million $8.29 Million
+LJK&RQFUHWH&XUE
A long-term implementation may be completed
with concrete and may require new curbs along a
majority of the roadway. This method requires a
higher capital cost but is longer lasting than other
PDWHULDOVVXFKDVSDLQWDQGWUDɤFGHOLQHDWRUV
Under this option, the City would install
SHGHVWULDQLPSURYHPHQWVLGHQWL¿HGLQWKLV
plan using a combination of paint and concrete,
including moving existing curb lines to install
concrete bulb-outs. Additionally, this option
LQFOXGHVSURYLGLQJSHUPDQHQWEXɣHUHG
bicycle lane or separated bikeway facilities
utilizing low-impact materials including paint
DQGWUDɤFGHOLQHDWRUVDVZHOODVKLJKHUFRVW
materials including concrete for creating
PRUHUREXVWSDYHGEXɣHUVEHWZHHQYHKLFOHV
and bicyclists. This option ranges in cost
from $7.22 to $8.29 million (see Table 11).

Table 11. Cost Based Alternatives
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD 5 ple entation
Funding Options
/2&$/$1'5(*,21$/
*5$17352*5$06
2016 MEASURE B
Santa Clara voters approved a half-cent sales tax
in 2016 to fund transportation infrastructure
investments. Measure B is expected to raise $6.3
billion (2017 dollars) over 30 years to fund nine
SURJUDPFDWHJRULHV7KH/RFDO6WUHHWVDQG5RDGV
Program returns funds to the cities and the
County on a formula basis to be used to repair
and maintain the street system. The allocation
is based on the population of the cities and the
&RXQW\RI6DQWD&ODUD¶VURDGDQGH[SUHVVZD\
lane mileage. Cities and the County will be
required to demonstrate that these funds would
be used to enhance and not replace their current
investments for road system maintenance and
repair. The program would also require that
cities and the County apply Compete Streets
best practices in order to improve bicycle and
pedestrian elements of the street system. If a
city or the County has a Pavement Condition
Index score of at least 70, it may use the funds
for other congestion relief projects. $250
million has been allocated towards the Bicycle
and Pedestrian Program. Within the Bicycle
and Pedestrian Program, funds are divided
between capital projects (80 percent), education
and encouragement programs (15 percent) and
planning studies (5 percent). The education and
encouragement funds will be allocated to cities
based on a population formula with a $10,000
annual minimum allocation per city; $250,000
will be reserved for countywide programs.

Funds for bicycle and pedestrian projects are
applied to a select list of projects approved by the
Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Board.

Funds are programmed by VTA.

TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR CLEAN AIR

COUNTY PROGRAM MANAGER FUND
The Bay Area Air Quality Management District
(BAAQMD) administers funds to the VTA
for projects that reduce vehicle emissions
including bicycle projects. These funds come
from a $4 vehicle registration surcharge in
Bay Area counties and can be used as a match
for competitive state or federal programs.

Funds are programmed by VTA.

ONE BAY AREA GRANT
7KH2QH%D\$UHDJUDQWSURJUDP
2%$*

emphasizes funding for projects within Priority
Development Areas (PDAs) in the region that
are in-line with housing and land use goals.

Projects that are within or provide access to
WKHVH3'$VFRXOGTXDOLI\IRU2%$*JUDQWV
Funds are programmed by the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Santa
Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA).

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT
ACT ARTICLE 3
Transportation Development Act Article 3 (TDA
3) provides funding annually for bicycle and
pedestrian projects. Two percent of TDA funds
collected within the county are used for TDA 3
projects. MTC policies require that all projects be
reviewed by a Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Committee or similar body before approval.

Funds are programmed by VTA.
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD 5 ple entation
67$7($1')('(5$/*5$17
352*5$06

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP)
*RYHUQRU%URZQVLJQHGOHJLVODWLRQLQ
which consolidates existing federal and
state transportation programs including the
Transportation Alternatives program, Bicycle
Transportation Account, and State Safe Routes to
School, into a single program which is focused on
expanding and enhancing active transportation
across the state. The ATP program is intended
to increase the use of active transportation,
enhance safety for non-motorized users,
improve public health, and advance regional
*UHHQKRXVH*DV
*+*
UHGXFWLRQJRDOV
pursuant to SB 375 (of 2008) and SB 341 (of
2009). This grant program funds a wide variety
of activities and projects which further the
goals of the program including infrastructure,
non-infrastructure, and planning studies.

Funds are programmed by Caltrans
with guidance from the CTC.

HIGHWAY SAFETY

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
&DOWUDQVRɣHUV+LJKZD\6DIHW\,PSURYHPHQW
Program (HSIP) grants every one to two years.

Projects on any publicly owned road or active
transportation facility are eligible, including
bicycle and pedestrian improvements. HSIP
focuses on projects that explicitly address
documented safety challenges through proven
countermeasures, are implementation-
UHDG\DQGGHPRQVWUDWHFRVWHɣHFWLYHQHVV
Funds are programmed by Caltrans.

OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT
7KH&DOWUDQV2ɤFHRI7UDɤF6DIHW\
276

makes grants available to local and state public
agencies for programs that help them enforce
WUDɤFODZVHGXFDWHWKHSXEOLFLQWUDɤFVDIHW\
DQGSURYLGHYDULHGDQGHɣHFWLYHPHDQVRI
reducing fatalities, injuries, and economic
losses from collisions. Funding can be used
IRUVDIHW\WUDLQLQJVELNHKHOPHWVDQGWUDɤF
safety campaigns, among other activities.

Funds are programmed by OTS.
27+(567$7(352*5$06

ROAD MAINTENANCE AND

REHABILITATION PROGRAM
Senate Bill 1 (SB1) created the Road Maintenance
and Rehabilitation Program (RMRP) to address
deferred maintenance on state highways
and local road systems. Program funds can
be spent on both design and construction
HɣRUWV2QVWUHHWDFWLYHWUDQVSRUWDWLRQUHODWHG
maintenance projects are eligible if program
maintenance and other thresholds are met.

Funds are allocated to eligible jurisdictions.

Funds are programmed by the State Controller’s
2ɤFHZLWKJXLGDQFHIURPWKH&7&
3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3ODQ &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD 5 ple entation
Table 12. Funding Sources by Type
Local Source Formula Grants
(Federal/State)
Formula Grants
(Regional)
Competitive
Grants
(Federal/State)
Competitive
Grants
(Regional)
Santa Clara Capital
Improvement Plan

&,3
*HQHUDO)XQG
/RFDO6WUHHWVDQG
Roads Program (SB1)
Measure B (2016)
/RFDO6WUHHWVDQG
Roads
Highway Safety
Improvement Program
(HSIP)
2QH%D\$UHD*UDQW
3URJUDP
2%$*

7UDɤF,PSDFW)HHV TDA Article 3 Vehicle Registration
Fee
2ɤFHRI7UDɤF6DIHW\
(OTS)
Measure B (2016)
Bicycle and Pedestrian
Planning Projects
*DV7D[ Active Transportation
Program (ATP)
Transportation Fund
for Clean Air (TFCA)
Appendices
A. Working Papers
Ń :RUNLQJ3DSHU
([LVWLQJ&RQGLWLRQV0HPR
Ń :RUNLQJ3DSHU
3DUNLQJ8WLOL]DWLRQ0HPR
Ń :RUNLQJ3DSHU
)XWXUH9ROXPH)RUHFDVWV
Ń :RUNLQJ3DSHU
7UDɤF$QDO\VLV0HPR
B. Survey Results
C. Public Outreach Materials
D. Collision Data
Appendix A
Working Paper 1

Memorandum
Date: 6HSWHPEHU
To: &LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD
CC: 0U-HII.QRZOHV$OWD3ODQQLQJ'HVLJQ,QF
From: 7ULVKD'XGDOD*DU\%ODFN

Subject: 3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV±%DVHOLQH&RQGLWLRQV$QDO\ VLV

7KH&LW\RI6DQWD&ODUDZDVUHFHQWO\DZDUGHGD&DOLIRUQLD'HSDUWPHQWRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ &DOWUDQV

JUDQWWRLPSOHPHQWFRPSOHWHVWUHHWVLPSURYHPHQWVDORQJWKHPLOHVHJPHQWRI3UXQHULGJH $YHQXHEHWZHHQ3RPHUR\$YHQXHDQG:LQFKHVWHU%RXOHYDUG HDVWHUQFLW\OLPLW
&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV
DUHURDGZD\VWKDWDUHGHVLJQHGWRHQDEOHVDIHDQGFRPIRUWDEOHDFFHVVIRUDOOURDGZD\XVHUV
SHGHVWULDQVELF\FOLVWVWUDQVLWULGHUVDQGDXWRPRELOHGULYHUVRIDOODJHVDQGDELOLWLHV,WLVQRWHGWKDW D&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV3URMHFWZDVDOUHDG\LPSOHPHQWHGRQWKHDSSUR[LPDWHO\PLOHVHJPHQWRI 3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHZHVWRI3RPHUR\$YHQXHEHWZHHQ7DQWDX$YHQXHDQG3RPHUR\$YHQXH7KLV PLOHVHJPHQWIRUPHUO\ZDVIRXUWUDYHOODQHVXQGLYLGHGDQGQRZFRQVLVWVRIRQHWUDYHOODQHLQHDFK GLUHFWLRQDQGDFHQWHUWXUQODQHIRUDXWRPRELOHWUDIILFDELF\FOHODQHLQHDFKGLUHFWLRQDSDUNLQJ ODQHDQGDSHGHVWULDQVLGHZDONRQERWKVLGHVRIWKHURDGZD\
Baseline Conditions analysis
7KHVWXG\DUHDFRQVLVWVRIDPLOHVHFWLRQRI3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH,QFRRUGLQDWLRQZLWKWKH&LW\D WRWDORILQWHUVHFWLRQVZHUHLGHQWLILHGIRUVWXG\
LQWHUVHFWLRQVDORQJ3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHDQG
LQWHUVHFWLRQVDORQJ)RUEHV$YHQXH+RPHVWHDG5RDGDQG0DXULFLD$YHQXH VHH)LJXUH
7KHVH
LQWHUVHFWLRQVDUHVKRZQLQ7DEOH7KHUHDVRQWRVWXG\VRPHLQWHUVHFWLRQVRII3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH LVWKDWDQ\UHGXFHGWUDIILFFDSDFLW\RQ3UXQHULGJHFRXOGOHDGWRDQLQFUHDVHLQYROXPHRQSDUDOOHO VWUHHWV

7KHEDVHOLQHFRQGLWLRQVDQDO\VLVZDVFRQGXFWHGEDVHGRQSHDNKRXUYROXPHVWKDWDUHUHIOHFWLYHRI SUH&29,'FRQGLWLRQVH[LVWLQJODQHJHRPHWULHVDQGH[LVWLQJVLJQDOWLPLQJVDVGHVFULEHGEHORZ Data Collection
Intersection Lane Geometries
7KHH[LVWLQJODQHJHRPHWULHVZHUHGHWHUPLQHGIURPPDSVDQGILHOGYLVLWV7KHH[LVWLQJODQH JHRPHWULHVDWDOOVWXG\LQWHUVHFWLRQVDUHVKRZQRQ)LJXUH Intersection Turning Movement Counts
:HHNGD\$0

DQG30

SHDNKRXUWUDIILFFRXQWVZHUHFRQGXFWHGDWDOOLQWHUVHFWLRQV LQFOXGLQJELF\FOHDQGSHGHVWULDQFRXQWVRQ7KXUVGD\)HEUXDU\WK'XHWRVKHOWHULQSODFH RUGHUVILUVWLVVXHGLQ0DUFKPRVWEXVLQHVVHVDQGVFKRROVZHUHFORVHGDQGSHRSOHVWDUWHG ZRUNLQJDWKRPHWRWKHH[WHQWSRVVLEOH:KLOHVRPHEXVLQHVVHVKDYHVXEVHTXHQWO\UHRSHQHG VXEMHFWWRFHUWDLQUHVWULFWLRQVWUDIILFYROXPHVFRQWLQXHWREHVXEVWDQWLDOO\EHORZSUH&29,' ,-j~ jP ...
8 1111o......1111 ~~XAGON hANSPORTATION (ONSU LTANTS. INC. ~
n am • •
~ , '
-0-,..
ate
•
~
Q
'
Cd • •
4 North Second Street , Suite 400 • San Jose, California 95113 • phone 408 .97L6100 · fax 408 .971.6102 · www, hextrans .com 3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH&RPSODWH6WUHHWV±%DVHOLQH&RQGLWLRQV$QDO\VLV 6HSWHPEHU

Table 1
Study Intersections
FRQGLWLRQV7KXVWREHFRQVHUYDWLYHWKHEDVHOLQHFRQGLWLRQVDQDO\VLVLVEDVHGRQSUH&29,' FRQGLWLRQV+H[DJRQKDVKLVWRULFDOFRXQWVIURPWKHSDVWWZR\HDUV SUH&29,'
IRURIWKHVWXG\
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ntersection Control
Acceptable
LOS
3RPHUR\$YHQXHDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO '
&URQLQ'ULYHDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO '
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHDQG5DGFOLIIH'ULYH 26:& '
:RRGKDPV5RDGDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO '
5HGZRRG$YHQXHDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 2:6& '
.LHO\%RXOHYDUGDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO '
7DQRDN'ULYHDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 2:6& '
6DQ7RPDV([SUHVVZD\DQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO '

6DUDWRJD$YHQXHDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO '
&\SUHVV$YHQXHDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO '
/RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUGDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 2:6& '
:LQFKHVWHU%RXOHYDUGDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO '
3RPHUR\$YHQXHDQG)RUEHV$YHQXH $:6& '
:RRGKDPV5RDGDQG)RUEHV$YHQXH $:6& '
.LHO\%RXOHYDUGDQG)RUEHV$YHQXH 6LJQDO '
6DQ7RPDV([SUHVVZD\DQG)RUEHV$YHQXH 6LJQDO '
/RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUGDQG)RUEHV$YHQXH $:6& '
3RPHUR\$YHQXHDQG+RPHVWHDG5RDG 6LJQDO '

:RRGKDPV5RDGDQG+RPHVWHDG5RDG 2:6& '
.LHO\%RXOHYDUGDQG+RPHVWHDG5RDG 6LJQDO '
6DQ7RPDV([SUHVVZD\DQG+RPHVWHDG5RDG
6LJQDO (
/RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUGDQG+RPHVWHDG5RDG 6LJQDO '
&URQLQ'ULYHDQG0DXULFLD$YHQXH $:6& '
:RRGKDPV5RDGDQG0DXULFLD$YHQXH $:6& '
.LHO\%RXOHYDUGDQG0DXULFLD$YHQXH 7:6& '
1RWHV

GHQRWHV&03LQWHUVHFWLRQ
( )
:c:::
rr-,
>< >a-.

C)
:::z:
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH&RPSODWH6WUHHWV±%DVHOLQH&RQGLWLRQV$QDO\VLV 6HSWHPEHU

3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHFRUULGRU7KLVLVDFRQVHUYDWLYHDVVXPSWLRQDVWKHUHDUHDQXPEHURIUHVLGHQWLDO VWUHHWVWKDWFRQQHFWWR3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHZKLFKDUHQRWEHLQJDQDO\]HGEXWWKHYROXPHLVEHLQJ DFFRXQWHGIRUDWRQHRIWKHVWXG\LQWHUVHFWLRQV7KHEDVHOLQH$0DQG30SHDNKRXUYROXPHVDUH VKRZQRQ)LJXUH

Table 2
Comparison of Historical Traffic Counts

Signal Timings
7KHUHDUHDWRWDORIVLJQDOL]HGVWXG\LQWHUVHFWLRQV6LJQDOWLPLQJLQIRUPDWLRQIRUDOOLQWHUVHFWLRQV ZHUHREWDLQHGIURPWKH&LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD6DQWD&ODUD&RXQW\DQG&LW\RI6DQ-RVH7KH PLQLPXPJUHHQ\HOORZDQGUHGWLPHVDQGSHGHVWULDQFOHDUDQFHWLPHVZHUHHQWHUHGEDVHGRQWKH VLJQDOWLPLQJVKHHWV7KHPLQLPXPJUHHQWLPHZDVHQWHUHGDVWKHVXPRISHGHVWULDQZDONWLPHSOXV WKHSHGHVWULDQFOHDUDQFHWLPHZKHUHWKHUHZDVDSHGHVWULDQSKDVH
Average Daily Traffic Counts (ADT)
6HYHQGD\DYHUDJHGDLO\WUDIILFFRXQWVDORQJZLWKYHKLFOHFODVVLILFDWLRQFRXQWVZHUHFRQGXFWHGDW IRXUORFDWLRQVDORQJ3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHRQ7KXUVGD\)HEUXDU\WK7KHVHYHQGD\ ZHHNGD\
7XHVGD\WKURXJK7KXUVGD\
DQGZHHNHQG
6DWXUGD\DQG6XQGD\
FRXQWVDUH
VXPPDUL]HGLQ7DEOHDQGDOVRLQFOXGHGLQWKHDSSHQGL[

#I ntersection Historical
Count Date
Historical
Count
2021
Count
%
decrease
Historical
Count Date
Historical
Count
2021
Count
%
decrease
6 Pruneridge/Kiely Boulevard 5/10/218 2,780 944 66% 5/10/218 3,166 1,810 43% 8 Pruneridge/San Tomas Expressway 1/23/2019 5,462 2,015 63% 5/24/2018 5,609 3,593 36% 9 Pruneridge/Saratoga Avenue 1/22/2019 2,342 962 59% 1/22/2019 2,654 1,798 32% 12 Pruneridge/Winchester Boulevard 5/24/2018 2,234 926 59% 5/24/2018 2,736 1,581 42% 15 Forbes/Kiely Boulevard 5/10/2018 1,670 556 67% 5/10/2018 2,139 936 56% 16 Forbes/San Tomas Expressway 5/24/2018 4,470 1,719 62% 5/24/2018 4,591 2,776 40% 20 Homestead/Kiely Boulevard 5/16/2019 3,379 1,197 65% 5/10/2018 3,845 2,064 46% 21 Homestead/San Tomas Expressway 5/16/2019 6,079 2,249 63% 11/8/2018 5,975 3,537 41% Average 63% 42%
PM Peak HourAM Peak Hour
( )
:c:::
rr-,
>< >a-.

C)
:::z:

Santa
Clara
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12
13 14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
11 .LHO\%OYG
3UXQHULGJH$YH
6DUDWRJD$YH
0DXULFLD$YH
/DZUHQFH([S\
3RPHUR\$YH
/RV3DGUHV%OYG
6FRWW%OYG6FRWW%OYG6FRWW%OYG
:RRGKDPV5G
1:LQFKHVWHU%OYG
)RUEHV$YH
6DQ7RPDV([SZ\6DQ7RPDV([SZ\6DQ7RPDV([SZ\
7DQRDN'U
&\SUHVV$YH&\SUHVV$YH
+RPHVWHDG5G+RPHVWHDG5G+RPHVWHDG5G
%HQWRQ6W%HQWRQ6W%HQWRQ6W
6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG
&URQLQ'U&URQLQ'U
5HGZRRG5HGZRRG
$YH$YH
5DGFOLIIH5DGFOLIIH
'U'U
&\SUHVV$YH
&URQLQ'U
5HGZRRG
$YH
5DGFOLIIH
'U
&\SUHVV&\SUHVV$YH$YH&\SUHVV$YH
X 6WXG\,QWHUVHFWLRQ
([LVWLQJ/DQH5RDGZD\ZLWK2Q6WUHHW3DUNLQJ
LEGEND
&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV±/DQHVZLWK&HQWHU7XUQ/DQH%LNH/DQHV 3DUNLQJ/DQH 3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV
Figure 1
Study Intersections
= ~[XAGON 0
NORTH
Notto Scale
:::c:
n-,
><
>
~
c=:,
:::z
r m [QQI]. Pri
II
(/)
co· :,
~
§.
a.
:,
(D
iil
CD
g
0 :,
m >< cii" =.
:::::s
cc
r m
:::::s
CD
C')
0 :::::s .... cc·
z
II CJ
(/)
co· :,
◊
II
::i:
~
I»" ::,
(!)
C: 'Tl
DJ cc·
!:!:. C:
g a
UI N
)>,1
<0
CDC-
CD
""
~ 4--Los
Padres
Blvd
• ➔ ~
;(JI
c.o
3 (I)
"' <ii'
Q)
-t_ a.
.{ ! L. +-
.-
Pomeroy
Ave - -
= =
J +i r r --+
-.
;(JI
c.o
3 (I)
"' <ii'
Q)
a.
.{ !
Woodhams
Rd
J +iii -.
• ;(JI
c.o
3 (I)
"' <ii'
Q)
a. ~
.{ ! L. +-
.-
Kiely
Blvd .
~
~ ~
J
+i r r --+
--+
-.
.... )>.,, .... <0 ...... a,c3- w
CD
"'
~ ~
.-
Pomeroy
Ave
• J ~ ..
.... )>,1 .... <0 0C) (I) a- .,:,.
(I)
"'
~ 4--
Woodhams
Rd
•
➔ ~
.... )>.,, .... <O co (I) a- U'I (I)
"'
~
~ T
Kiely
Blvd - -
= =
--±+ ~
..

N )>.,, .... <0
0 (I) a- en (I) -t_ "' -◊~
+-
.Ji. +-
San .-Tomas
Exowv - -
= =
J
1r --+
--+
~◊--+
-.
)> 7J co <2 CD:,
(I)
a: <O
-t_ (I)
.{ ! L.
+- .{ ! +-
Saratoga .- Redwood
Ave =;;
~ Ave
~ ~
+i r r -{ J
--+
--+
-.
•
)> 7J .... <~
(l)C: 0 ::,
(I)
a: <O
(I)
.{} 4-- .{ ! L.

Cypress
Ave =
~ ~\~~ ~
~ ~
=
➔ 1r
J
--+
..
~4' .... (l)C: .... ::,
(I)
::,.
•
a. <O
(I)
!} }- ! ! L.

Los
rr Padres
Bvld
)> 7J
<2 ....
(I)::,
N (I)
:,.
a. co
(I)
~
.J ! L. +-
.{ ! L. .- San
Winchester Tomas
Blvd = ~ Exnwv -
~ ~
=
+i r r
J J
--+ --+
--+ --+
-. ~◊--+
-.
)> 7J
~§ U'I
CD
a: <O
CD
1i
)> 7J en <~ (l)C: ::,
(I)
:,.
a. co
(I)
~
+-
.- Cronin
~ Dr
=
+i r r
)> 7J
...... <2
•
(I)::,
(I)
::,.
a. co
(I)
-t_
.-
Tanoak
rr
Dr
)> 7J
~§ 0C)
-t_ (I)
::,.
-◊~ a. co
(I)
+-
+-
.-.- Woodhams
~ Rd
;==
+i r r
)> 7J ....
<B §
CD ::,.
a. <O
(I)
-t_
! L. .-
.-
ooe F-= Pomeroy
Ave
ir
)> 7J N <~ a,C: ::,
(I)
a: co
(I)
.{ !
ooe
-{ 1i
)> 7J
w <~ a,C: ::,
(I)
•
::,.
a. co
(I)
!} }-
Radcliffe
rr
Dr
)> 7J .,:,. <2 CD:,
(I)
::,.
a. <O
(I)
.{} ~
.--
~
= F-=
1r J
..
"'ti -,
C ::,
(1)
-,
a:

OQ
(1)
n
0 3
"O
(1)
,-+
(1)
<.n ,-+ -,
(1)
(1)
,-+
VI
Pruneridge Complete Streets
21 22
◊
~
+--
~ .J1111L. + +
Homestead
H
Homestead
H Rd Rd
.J Ir'~ .J Ir'~
.J
+i+illllr .. --+
.. ◊
u,
gi~ (l)i~ ~g~
C/ll-W .3~m
25 •
.{ 1 L. 4--Mauricia
Ave
-+ +i l r
•
.2,,:,
.9L2:
~al
LEGEND
• = Sign ◊ = HOV Lane
~ = Signalized Intersection
= ~nA~ON
23 ~ ~ + Mauricia
Ave
•
"IP'
~ -+
C
·1:
e~
()0
24 4-- ~ 4--
Mauricia
Ave
•
~ -+ ~
u,
E .,
.c ,,
8,, :i:tr
Figure 2
Existing Lane Configurations
@
NORTH
Notto Scale
Pruneridge Complete Streets
1*
>- Q)
2*
LO ~~
-E M ~,\: ~
in
~
t._ 229(121) Lt') ;; ~
~ 872(539) ~ 983(567)
Pruneridge .J l+ Pruneridge + 66(62) Ave Ave
75(123) J
+i r 380(936) --+ 378(965) --+ M N'
93(105) + a, :::!.,
co Lt')
~ 0
~ ~
C
·c
e~ uo
5* 6
_a,_
N N 00 Ml'--"St
~-~ -i---- t._ 144(65) O"St o.n
~ 968(606)
00 Na,
~ 821(468)
Pruneridge + 81(58) Pruneridge .J l l+ r 37(83) Ave Ave +i r 123(88) J
+i i r 533(967) --+ r::- ~
382(799) --+
~~~ 32(29) +
~
62(121) +
~ "St -"St-00 -"St -g M "St <O I'--
0 ~ I'--
3' Lt')
-0 Q) .2:"0
~~
Q)>
~ai
9 10*
M~ o--~i----
~ <O 0 M~ M --<0 -00N 0 N - t._ 36(33) 00-- t._ 39(24) 01'-- I'-- I'-- 00 M ~MM ~M Lt') Pruneridge .J l l+
~ 676(328)
Pruneridge .J l l+
~ 610(408)
+ 242(106) + 31(22) Ave Ave
120(116) .....7
+i i r 12(21) .....7
+i i r 222(684) --+ ;:-~co 321 (900) --+ 0) coco 10(9) + :::!.,M~ 21(61) + N 00~ 00-- (0 O> lC)
t
N "St Lt') u, <O Lt') Lt')
"St a, u, ~
"St e e., Q.Q)
~~
>->
U<C
13* 14*
<O - r::-_,.,.,_
<ON 0 a, I'-- -
t._ 5(5) N-1'-- so~ _,.,.,_
t._ 54(61) a, I'-- N Lt') M Lt')
~ 65(49) ~ N <O
.J l l+
~ 30(14) Forbes
.J l l+ + 19(14) Forbes
+ 51(33)
Ave
Ave
11 (10) .....7
+i i r 24(26) J
+i i r 8(21) --+ 43(66)--+ ms;:::--L():;=-N 30(24) + ::s.!:£.:s 11(10) + -N"St ~ ~~ a, N - u, ~ -00 E
~ "St~
>- NM
e 0 .,
M .c Q)

8.,, 8g?
a.<C :i:a::
17* 18*
r::- ~ a, --M ~ ~ a,
<O ~ - ~ N a,
:s~~ moM t._ 11(12) t._ 205( 134) o~ <O 00<'? ~
M~ ~ ~N ~
Forbes
.J l l+
~ 43(24)
Homestead .J l l+
~ 1139(752)
Ave + 19(7) + 70(57) Rd
35(21) .....7
+i i r 113(108) .....7
+i i r 27(28)--+ 732(1075) --+ 0L00> ~~~ 100(75) + l'--N- 54(73) + -~o cos~ 00-<O M e u, 0 <O ~
ti)~~
~ a, N
§§? om.?! _,a_a, a.<C
*Growth factors were used to develop baseline pre-COVID volumes.

LEGEND
XX(XX) = AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
= ~nA~ON
3* ~o 4* u -0
~
., coco~ _a:: NM<'?
~ Lt')
t._ 18(10) o Mo t._ 42(42) ~ M Lt') N <O M ~
~ 1015(615) ~ 937(564)
Pruneridge .J l+ Pruneridge .J l l+
Ave + 31(17)
Ave
16(12) J 24(35) J +i i r 459(972) --+ 440(925) --+ M :;=-s 16(40) + M"St"St
(OCX)Lt) u,
E "St "St <O .,
.c
-0

8.,, :i:O::
7* .,. ~
8 mo 0
-o C ., MN-
M -f- I'-- Lt') 0
N ~ N 00 <O ~ --~ a, t._ 40(40) ~ a, - t._ 184(156) c=;; N O a, <O
~ 933(553)
~ 00 00
~ 617(312)
Pruneridge .J l+ Pruneridge .J l L. r 3(14) Ave Ave
16(26) .....7 170(99) J
+i i r 535(989) --+ 253(600) --+ rosm 133(312) + 0 ON
~~--~o o.n-~
~j
M 00 NM
ffi~ X g;j
(l)f-W
11* u, u, -0 12 -9~~ <O .,
a. _,.,.,_
M ~
M <O Lt')
<O -i---
i
-M- t._ 30(43) t._ 75(179) <000 M
~ "St~ M
~ 384(296)
Pruneridge .J l+
~ 563(426) Pruneridge .J l L.

Ave r 56(109) Ave
20(32) J 40(59) .....7
+i i r 399(897) --+ 319(569) --+ ro:;=-o
119(299) ~ 00 NO
::s. ~ ::s. .S! I'-- <O ~
u, 00 "St a, Q) ~ I'--.c
"-o .£ >
:i:ai
15 16
LO -
0)
I'---N~ -<D a,a, N a, N -M-N
t._ 59(27)
a, -N
t._ 113(21) _a, - -00 N a, "St <O o.nN-O>M M a, 00 I'-- Forbes
.J l l+
~ 97(61)
Forbes
.J l L.
~ 121(47)
r 43(71) r 57(10) Ave Ave
37(37) J
+i i r
50(63) J
+i i r 73(80)--+ 46(85)--+ LO ci, r::- MLOo 25(27) +
~ MO> 76(177) +
Lt') 00 Lt')
-o.n- -N-"St -o ~ :s.re N 00 "St
00 I'--I'--
"'! 0 .,
~-0
ffi§x .~.?! M
~a, (l)f-W
19* 20
cor=::--~ci!i~ --~ i---~- t._ 169(148)
~ 1110(850)
~ 0 Lt')
NMI'--
Homestead r 57(85) Homestead .J l L.
~ 735(550)
Rd r 88(123) Rd
805(1068) --+ +i r 146(171) .....7
+i i r 0 N' 603(714) --+ 46(77) + M a, co~co
~ in 101(249) + "St Na,
u, ~"St-<O --N E ~ ~a, ., 00 I'--.c
i~
~ <O
~-0
.~z ~a,
Figure 3
Baseline (Pre-COVID) Traffic Volumes
@
NORTH
Notto Scale
Pruneridge Complete Streets
21 22 -co

CV) CV) -
co l.O C> _,._ -
-.:t NC> 00 co O'>
--~ CV)~~
00 O'> - -t_ 157(35) o om -t_ 19(15) O'> C> C> N r-- CV) -.:t l.O N Homestead .J l ¼ +- 543(348)
Homestead .J l ¼ +- 504(350)
+ 93(71) + 7(16) Rd Rd
342(240) J
Mir
25(31) J
hir 349(619) --+ 324(516) --+ CC>~M ;::::- COM
136(169) + l.O CV) C> 9(37) +
~ l.O ~
~ ~~
MCO~ -~-l.O - ...... CO C>N
8I~N~"° u, ~
(l)i~ ~g~ M
C/ll-W .3~m
25*
o-N l.O _,._ ~
l.O -~
l.O C> - 't_ 73(71) -N CV)
00 CV) -.:t
+- 5(9)
Mauricia .J l ¼ + 11(5) Ave
27(10) J
hir 3(3)--+ ro-oco 46(42) + -.:t ~N
-.,, -CV)-~
-.:t l.O ~
......
.2,,:, co
.9L2:
~al
*Growth factors were used to develop baseline pre-COVID volumes.

LEGEND
XX(XX) = AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
= ~nA~ON
23*
Mauricia
Ave
24*
-~ -m-00 ~ - O'> -.:t C>
't_ 35(21) co~ co ~-...,. moo~ -t_ 14(21) -CV) -CV) -.:t CV) ...,. co CV)
+- 14(19)
.J l ¼
+- 11(17) Mauricia .J l L. + 3(10) + 5(3) Ave
57(64)J ~ir
27(19) ....7
~ir
22(30)--+ 24(10)--+ G'ro'~ r::- L() in" 5(9)+ -co~
11(17) + -r-- - 00 --00 -~ u, g 00 ...... ~
E l.O .,
C .c
·1: ,,
e~ 8,,
()0 :i:tr
Figure 3
Baseline (Pre-COVID) Traffic Volumes
@
NORTH
Notto Scale
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH&RPSODWH6WUHHWV±%DVHOLQH&RQGLWLRQV$QDO\VLV 6HSWHPEHU

Table
Pruneridge Avenue - Average Daily Traffic Counts

$VVKRZQLQ7DEOHDQDYHUDJHGDLO\WUDIILFRIDSSUR[LPDWHO\ZDVPHDVXUHGDORQJ 3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH%DVHGRQWKHYHKLFOHFODVVLILFDWLRQFRXQWVWKHWUDIILFZDVFRPSRVHGRI DSSUR[LPDWHO\ELF\FOHWUDIILF
SDVVHQJHUFDUVSLFNXSWUXFNVYDQVDQG
WUXFNVEXVHV$OVRVKRZQLQWKHWDEOHIRUFRPSDULVRQDUHWKHSUH&29,'$'7DORQJ3UXQHULGJH $YHQXH)RUVHJPHQWVDQGWKHSUH&29,'$'7ZDVFDOFXODWHGEDVHGRQWKHKLVWRULFDO30 SHDNKRXUWXUQLQJPRYHPHQWFRXQWVDW.LHO\%RXOHYDUG6DUDWRJD$YHQXHDQG:LQFKHVWHU %RXOHYDUGDVVXPLQJWKDWDSSUR[LPDWHO\RIWKHWRWDOGDLO\WUDIILFRFFXUVGXULQJWKH30SHDN 7KLVLVEDVHGRQ-XQH30SHDNKRXUFRXQWDWWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQRI3UXQHULGJHDQG3RPHUR\DQG -XQH$'7FRXQWRQWKHVHJPHQWRI3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHWRWKHZHVWRI3RPHUR\$YHQXH LQFOXGHGLQWKHPruneridge Avenue Bicycle Lane Improvements Post-Construction Traffic StudyE\ .LPHO\+RUQDQG$VVRFLDWHV,QF)RUVHJPHQWWKHSUH&29,'$'7LVEDVHGRQWKHGDLO\WUDIILF FRXQWIURP1RYHPEHU7KHFRPSDULVRQVKRZVWKDWWKHFXUUHQW$'7RQ3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHLV DSSUR[LPDWHO\ORZHUFRPSDUHGWRSUH&29,'YROXPHV
Bicycle Counts
$YHUDJHZHHNGD\DQGZHHNHQGELF\FOHWUDIILFFRXQWVFRQGXFWHGDWIRXUORFDWLRQVRQ3UXQHULGJH $YHQXHLQ)HEUXDU\DUHVXPPDUL]HGLQ7DEOH7KHGD\FRXQWLVWKHDYHUDJHQXPEHURI ELF\FOHVRQ3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHLQDKRXUSHULRGDYHUDJHGRYHUDGD\SHULRG 6XQGD\WKURXJK
6DWXUGD\
7KH:HHNGD\
77K
FRXQWVKRZVWKHDYHUDJHRIWKHWRWDOQXPEHURIELF\FOHVRQ 3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHLQDKRXUSHULRGFRXQWHGRQ7XHVGD\:HGQHVGD\DQG7KXUVGD\:HHNGD\

$03HDN
LVWKHDYHUDJHQXPEHURIELF\FOHVLQWKHSHDNRQHKRXURFFXUULQJEHWZHHQ$0± $0
RQ7XHVGD\:HGQHVGD\DQG7KXUVGD\:HHNGD\
303HDN
LVWKHDYHUDJHQXPEHURIELF\FOHVLQ
WKHSHDNRQHKRXURFFXUULQJEHWZHHQ30±30RQ7XHVGD\:HGQHVGD\DQG7KXUVGD\
7KH:HHNHQG
6DW 6XQ
FRXQWLVWKHWRWDOQXPEHURIELF\FOHVRQ3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHLQDKRXU SHULRGDYHUDJHGRYHUWKHZHHNHQG
6DWXUGD\DQG6XQGD\
7KH:HHNHQG
$03HDN
LVWKH
DYHUDJHQXPEHURIELF\FOHVLQWKHSHDNRQHKRXURFFXUULQJEHWZHHQ$0± $0RQ6DWXUGD\DQG
6XQGD\:HHNHQG
303HDN
LVWKHDYHUDJHQXPEHURIELF\FOHVLQWKHSHDNRQHKRXURFFXUULQJ # Location EB WB Total EB WB Total
1 Pruneridge (Lawrence - Pomeroy) 7-day 4,076 4,188 8,264 - - - Weekday (T-Th) 4,141 4,236 8,377 7,451 7,622 15,073
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 3,877 4,017 7,894 - - -
2 Pruneridge (Pomeroy - Kiely) 7-day 4,093 4,045 8,138 - - - Weekday (T-Th) 4,176 4,107 8,283 7,392 7,269 14,661
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 3,841 3,832 7,673 ---
3 Pruneridge (Kiely - Saratoga) 7-day 3,920 3,569 7,489 --- Weekday (T-Th) 4,090 3,580 7,670 7,626 6,675 14,301
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 3,595 3,398 6,993 ---
4 Pruneridge (Saratoga - Winchester) 7-day 4,421 3,858 8,279 --- Weekday (T-Th) 4,448 3,851 8,298 7,724 6,688 14,412
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 4,223 3,709 7,932 - - -
Notes:

C)
:::z:
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH&RPSODWH6WUHHWV±%DVHOLQH&RQGLWLRQV$QDO\VLV 6HSWHPEHU

EHWZHHQ30±30RQ6DWXUGD\DQG6XQGD\7KHSHUFHQWDJHRIELF\FOHWUDIILFYDULHGEHWZHHQ WRRIWKHWRWDOWUDIILF

Table 4
Pruneridge Avenue – Bicycle Traffic Counts

Travel Time Runs and speeds
$WRWDORIILYHWUDYHOWLPHUXQVZHUHFRQGXFWHGLQHDFKGLUHFWLRQRQ3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHGXULQJWKH $0DQG30SHDNKRXUVXVLQJD*36GHYLFHDQGWKHIORDWLQJFDUWUDYHOWLPHPHWKRGRORJ\RQ 7KXUVGD\)HEUXDU\WK
VHH7DEOH

#L ocation EB W B T otal
1 Pruneridge (Lawrence - Pomeroy) 7-day 13 26 40
Weekday (T-Th) 13 26 39
Weekday (AM Peak) 2 3 5
Weekday (PM Peak) 3 4 7
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 16 32 47
Weekend (AM Peak) 2 5 7
Weekend (PM Peak) 3 7 9
2 Pruneridge (Pomeroy - Kiely) 7-day 38 21 59
Weekday (T-Th) 40 22 62
Weekday (AM Peak) 4 3 7
Weekday (PM Peak) 8 6 13
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 44 23 67
Weekend (AM Peak) 6 5 11
Weekend (PM Peak) 8 5 13
3 Pruneridge (Kiely - Saratoga) 7-day 57 38 96
Weekday (T-Th) 55 38 93
Weekday (AM Peak) 5 4 9
Weekday (PM Peak) 7 7 14
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 62 30 92
Weekend (AM Peak) 9 5 14
Weekend (PM Peak) 8 6 14
4 Pruneridge (Saratoga - Winchester) 7-day 95 53 148
Weekday (T-Th) 95 39 134
Weekday (AM Peak) 11 6 17
Weekday (PM Peak) 9 8 17
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 83 61 144
Weekend (AM Peak) 7 9 16
Weekend (PM Peak) 7 10 17
Bicycle Summary
2021 Average Counts
( )
:c:::
rr-,
>< >a-.

C)
:::z:
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH&RPSODWH6WUHHWV±%DVHOLQH&RQGLWLRQV$QDO\VLV 6HSWHPEHU

Table 5
Pruneridge Avenue - Travel Time Runs

7KHDYHUDJHWUDYHOWLPHRQHDVWERXQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHZDVVHFRQGV PLQXWHV
GXULQJWKH
$0SHDNKRXUDQGVHFRQGV
PLQXWHV
GXULQJWKH30SHDNKRXU7KHDYHUDJHWUDYHOWLPHRQ
ZHVWERXQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHZDVVHFRQGV
PLQXWHV
GXULQJWKH$0SHDNKRXUDQG
VHFRQGV
PLQXWHV
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

7KHSRVWHGVSHHGOLPLWRQ3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHLVPSKLQWKHVWXG\DUHD7KH WKSHUFHQWLOH
VSHHGDWIRXUORFDWLRQVDORQJ3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHLVVXPPDUL]HGLQ7DEOH$VVKRZQLQ7DEOH WKHSHUFHQWLOHVSHHGLQWKHVWXG\DUHDYDULHGEHWZHHQPSKWRPSKDQGWKHGDWDVKRZHG WKDWRQDQDYHUDJHRIWKHWUDIILFWREHWUDYHOLQJDWKLJKHUWKDQWKHSRVWHGVSHHGOLPLW
Table 6
Pruneridge Avenue – Speed Profile

Roadway Segment
Peak
Hour 12345 A v e r a g e
AM 375 294 351 391 378 358
PM 305 401 543 547 513 462
AM 271 268 291 339 371 308
PM 392 408 284 351 388 365
Note
Pruneridge - Eastbound
(Pomeroy to Winchester)
Pruneridge Westbound
(Winchester to Pomeroy)
Travel Time (seconds)
Travel times conducted on Thursday, February 25, 2021 using a GPS device and floating car methodology # Location Direction
Speed
(85th Percentile)
% of Vehicles
( > 35mph)
1 Lawrence to Pomeroy EB 36 mph 22%
WB 41 mph 49%
2 Pomeroy to Kiely EB 38 mph 31%
WB 39 mph 44%
3 Kiely to Saratoga EB 39 mph 39%
WB 34 mph 9%
4 Saratoga to Winchester EB 40 mph 48%
WB 41 mph 57%
( )
:c:::
rr-,
>< >a-.

C)
:::z:
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH&RPSODWH6WUHHWV±%DVHOLQH&RQGLWLRQV$QDO\VLV 6HSWHPEHU

Intersection Delay and Level of Service (LOS)
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
9,66,0DOORZVYLVXDO
GLVSOD\VDQGILQHWXQLQJRIRSHUDWLQJFKDUDFWHULVWLFVDORQJ3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHZKLFKDUHQRW QHFHVVDU\RQWKHSDUDOOHOVWUHHWV

)RUWKHSXUSRVHRIWKLVVWXG\OHYHORIVHUYLFH
/26
'RUEHWWHULVFRQVLGHUHGDFFHSWDEOH
LQWHUVHFWLRQRSHUDWLRQDQG/26(RU)LVFRQVLGHUHGGHILFLHQWRSHUDWLRQH[FHSWIRUWKH&03 LQWHUVHFWLRQVDORQJ6DQ7RPDV([SUHVVZD\)RU&03LQWHUVHFWLRQV/26(RUEHWWHULVFRQVLGHUHG DFFHSWDEOHLQWHUVHFWLRQRSHUDWLRQDQG/26)LVFRQVLGHUHGGHILFLHQWRSHUDWLRQ
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

Table 7
Simulation Model Travel Times

$VVKRZQLQWKHWDEOHWKHWUDYHOWLPHVIURPWKHPRGHODUHPDUJLQDOO\KLJKHUFRPSDUHGWRWKHWUDYHO WLPHVPHDVXUHGLQWKHILHOGUHSUHVHQWLQJDFRQVHUYDWLYHDQDO\VLV7KLVPRGHOZDVWKHQXVHGWR DQDO\]HWKHDGMXVWHGSUH&29,'YROXPHVWKDWZHUHGHYHORSHGE\DSSO\LQJDJURZWKIDFWRUWRWKH FRXQWV$VVKRZQLQWKHWDEOHWKHPRGHOGLGQRWVKRZDQ\LQFUHDVHLQWUDYHOWLPHEHWZHHQWKH FRXQWVDQGWKHSUH&29,'YROXPHVLQWKHQRQSHDNGLUHFWLRQV HDVWERXQGGXULQJWKH$0
Field
Measured
Peak
Hour
2021
Counts
2021
Counts
Adjusted
Pre-COVID
Volumes
Pruneridge Eastbound AM 358 416 440
PM 462 481 642
Pruneridge Westbound AM 308 420 496
PM 365 432 446
Travel Time (seconds)
Vissim Model
( )
:c:::
rr-,
>< >a-.

C)
:::z:
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH&RPSODWH6WUHHWV±%DVHOLQH&RQGLWLRQV$QDO\VLV 6HSWHPEHU

SHDNKRXUDQGZHVWERXQGGXULQJWKH30SHDNKRXU
)RUWKHSHDNGLUHFWLRQVRIWUDIILFZHVWERXQG
GXULQJWKH$0SHDNKRXUDQGHDVWERXQGGXULQJWKH30SHDNKRXUWKHWUDYHOWLPHLQFUHDVHGE\ PLQXWHDQGPLQXWHVUHVSHFWLYHO\

7KHLQWHUVHFWLRQGHOD\VDQGOHYHOVRIVHUYLFHGXULQJSUHSDQGHPLFFRQGLWLRQVDUHVKRZQLQ7DEOH $VVKRZQLQ7DEOHDOOLQWHUVHFWLRQVDUHRSHUDWLQJDWDFFHSWDEOHOHYHOVRIVHUYLFHH[FHSWIRUWKH 3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH6DQ7RPDV([SUHVVZD\LQWHUVHFWLRQ7KHDQDO\VLVVKRZVWKDWEDVHGRQWKH SUHSDQGHPLFYROXPHVWKLVLQWHUVHFWLRQRSHUDWHVDWXQDFFHSWDEOH/26)GXULQJWKH$0SHDNKRXU DQG/26(GXULQJWKH30SHDNKRXU

$WWKHXQVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQRI7DQRDN'ULYHWKHDQDO\VLVVKRZVWKDWWKHVRXWKERXQGOHIWWXUQ IURP7DQRDN'ULYHWRHDVWERXQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHRSHUDWHVDWXQDFFHSWDEOH/26)GXULQJWKH 30SHDNKRXU7KLVLVEHFDXVHZKHQWKHHDVWERXQGWUDIILFRQ3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHVWRSVDWWKH6DQ 7RPDV([SUHVVZD\WUDIILFOLJKWWKHTXHXHVH[WHQGSDVW7DQRDN'ULYHUHVXOWLQJLQORQJGHOD\IRU WUDIILFIURP7DQRDN'ULYHWRWXUQRQWRHDVWERXQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH
$WWKHXQVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQRI.LOH\%RXOHYDUGDQG0DXULFLD$YHQXHWKHDQDO\VLVVKRZVWKDW WUDIILFRQ0DXULFLD$YHQXHRSHUDWHVDWXQDFFHSWDEOH/26)GXULQJWKH30SHDNKRXU
7KHDYHUDJHDQGPD[LPXPTXHXHOHQJWKVRQ3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHDWWKHVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQVLQ WKHVWXG\DUHDGXULQJWKH$0DQG30SHDNKRXUVDUHVKRZQLQ7DEOH DQGLOOXVWUDWHGRQ)LJXUHV
DQG7KHVHTXHXHOHQJWKVDUHEDVHGRQDQDO\]LQJWKHSUHSDQGHPLFYROXPHV7KHTXHXHOHQJWKV DUHVKRZQDORQJ3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHVRWKDWDQ\FKDQJHVXQGHUSURMHFWFRQGLWLRQV ZLWKWKH
LPSOHPHQWDWLRQRIFRPSOHWHVWUHHWV
FDQEHFRPSDUHGWREDVHOLQHFRQGLWLRQV

7KHTXHXLQJDQDO\VLVVKRZVWKDWGXULQJWKH$0SHDNKRXURQZHVWERXQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH ZKLFKLVWKHSHDNGLUHFWLRQRIWUDIILFWKHDYHUDJHTXHXHOHQJWKVDWVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQVFDQYDU\ EHWZHHQFDUVDQGFDUVSHUODQHDQGWKHPD[LPXPTXHXHOHQJWKVFDQYDU\EHWZHHQFDUVDQG FDUVSHUODQH7KHTXHXHOHQJWKVGXULQJWKH$0SHDNKRXUGRQRWH[WHQGLQWRWKHXSVWUHDP VLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQV+RZHYHUWKHTXHXHVH[WHQGSDVWVRPHRIWKHUHVLGHQWLDOVWUHHWVWKDWDUH ORFDWHGXSVWUHDPRIWKHWUDIILFVLJQDOV7KHPD[LPXPTXHXHVRQZHVWERXQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH H[WHQGSDVW6ORDW&RXUWDW&URQLQ$YHQXHSDVW/XWKHU'ULYHDW.LHO\%RXOHYDUGDQGIHHWVKRUW RI6DUDWRJD$YHQXHDW6DQ7RPDV([SUHVVZD\

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
:c:::
rr-,
>< >a-.

C)
:::z:
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH&RPSODWH6WUHHWV±%DVHOLQH&RQGLWLRQV$QDO\VLV 6HSWHPEHU

7KHDQDO\VLVVKRZVWKDWWKHPD[LPXPTXHXHOHQJWKVZRXOGH[FHHGWKHWXUQSRFNHWOHQJWKVIRU PRVWRIWKHOHIWWXUQVDW.LHO\%RXOHYDUG6DQ7RPDV([SUHVVZD\6DUDWRJD$YHQXHDQG :LQFKHVWHU%RXOHYDUGLQWHUVHFWLRQVGXULQJWKHSHDNFRPPXWHKRXUV6RPHRIWKHVHTXHXHOHQJWKV DUHGXHWRWKHORQJTXHXHVLQWKHDGMDFHQWWKURXJKODQHZKLFKEORFNVDFFHVVWRWKHOHIWWXUQ SRFNHWVDWWKHVHLQWHUVHFWLRQV
Signal Warrant Analysis
7KHOHYHORIVHUYLFHDQDO\VLVIRUXQVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQVZDVVXSSOHPHQWHGZLWKDQDVVHVVPHQW RIWKHQHHGIRULQVWDOODWLRQRIDWUDIILFVLJQDONQRZQDVDVLJQDOZDUUDQWDQDO\VLV7KHQHHGIRU VLJQDOL]DWLRQRIXQVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQVLQDQXUEDQRUVXEXUEDQFRQWH[WLVW\SLFDOO\DVVHVVHG EDVHGRQWKH3HDN+RXU9ROXPH:DUUDQW
:DUUDQW
GHVFULEHGLQWKH&DOLIRUQLD0DQXDORQ
8QLIRUP7UDIILF&RQWURO'HYLFHVIRU6WUHHWVDQG+LJKZD\V &$087&'
3DUW+LJKZD\7UDIILF
6LJQDOV7KLVPHWKRGPDNHVQRHYDOXDWLRQRILQWHUVHFWLRQOHYHORIVHUYLFHEXWVLPSO\SURYLGHVDQ LQGLFDWLRQZKHWKHUYHKLFXODUSHDNKRXUYROXPHVDUHRUZRXOGEHVXIILFLHQWO\KLJKWRMXVWLI\ LQVWDOODWLRQRIDWUDIILFVLJQDO

6LJQDOZDUUDQWDQDO\VLVZDVFRQGXFWHGIRUERWK$0DQG30SHDNKRXUVDWWKHXQVLJQDOL]HGVWXG\ LQWHUVHFWLRQV1RQHRIWKHXQVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQVPHHWVLJQDOZDUUDQWVGXULQJHLWKHUSHDNKRXU XQGHUH[LVWLQJFRQGLWLRQV7KHSHDNKRXUVLJQDOZDUUDQWVKHHWVDUHFRQWDLQHGLQ$SSHQGL[( ( )
:c:::
rr-,
>< >a-.

C)
:::z:
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH&RPSODWH6WUHHWV±%DVHOLQH&RQGLWLRQV$QDO\VLV 6HSWHPEHU

Table 8
Baseline (Pre-COVID) Intersection Levels of Service

# Intersection Control
Peak
Hour
A verage
Delay LOS
3RPHUR\$YHQXHDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO $0
%
30 %
&URQLQ'ULYHDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO $0 $
30 %
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHDQG5DGFOLIIH'ULYH 26:& $0 15.2 $ C 30 16.2 $ C
:RRGKDPV5RDGDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO $0 %
30 %
5HGZRRG$YHQXHDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 2:6& $0 34.2 $ D 30 27.2 $ D
.LHO\%RXOHYDUGDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO $0

'
30 '
7DQRDN'ULYHDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 2:6& $0 30.1 $ D 30 180.5 ' F
6DQ7RPDV([SUHVVZD\DQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO $0 82.5 F 30 75.6 E

6DUDWRJD$YHQXHDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO $0
'
30 &
&\SUHVV$YHQXHDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO $0 % 30 &
/RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUGDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 2:6& $0 9.8 $ A 30 20.2 $ C
:LQFKHVWHU%RXOHYDUGDQG3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH 6LJQDO $0 &
30 '
3RPHUR\$YHQXHDQG)RUEHV$YHQXH $:6& $0 %
30 %
:RRGKDPV5RDGDQG)RUEHV$YHQXH $:6& $0 $
30 $
.LHO\%RXOHYDUGDQG)RUEHV$YHQXH 6LJQDO $0 %
30 %
6DQ7RPDV([SUHVVZD\DQG)RUEHV$YHQXH 6LJQDO $0 &
30 %
/RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUGDQG)RUEHV$YHQXH $:6& $0
$
30 $
3RPHUR\$YHQXHDQG+RPHVWHDG5RDG 6LJQDO $0
'
30 '

:RRGKDPV5RDGDQG+RPHVWHDG5RDG 2:6& $0 30.0 $ D 30 33.6 $ D
.LHO\%RXOHYDUGDQG+RPHVWHDG5RDG 6LJQDO $0 '
30 '
6DQ7RPDV([SUHVVZD\DQG+RPHVWHDG5RDG
6LJQDO $0 '
30 '
/RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUGDQG+RPHVWHDG5RDG 6LJQDO $0 & 30 &
&URQLQ'ULYHDQG0DXULFLD$YHQXH $:6& $0
$
30 $
:RRGKDPV5RDGDQG0DXULFLD$YHQXH $:6& $0 $
30 $
.LHO\%RXOHYDUGDQG0DXULFLD$YHQXH 7:6& $0

33.5 $ D
30 70.9 $ F
1RWHV

GHQRWHV&03LQWHUVHFWLRQ
)RU7:6&DQG2:6&WKH'HOD\DQG/26IRUWKHZRUVWPRYHPHQWLVVKRZQLQLWDOLFV Bold LQGLFDWHVSRRUOHYHORIVHUYLFH
Existing Conditions
,QWHUVHFWLRQFRQWUROW\SHGHILQLWLRQV
7:6& 7ZRZD\VWRSFRQ WURO
2:6& 2QHZD\VWRSFRQWURO
$:6& $OOZD\VWRS

FRQWURO
/26FDOFXODWLRQUHIOHFWVWKHH[LVWHQFHRIFHQWHUWXUQLQJODQHRQ+RPHVWHDG5RDGDQG:RRGKDPV5RDGLQWHUVHFWLRQ ( )
:c:::
rr-,
>< >a-.

C)
:::z:
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH&RPSODWH6WUHHWV±%DVHOLQH&RQGLWLRQV$QDO\VLV 6HSWHPEHU

Table 9
Baseline (Pre-COVID) Queue Lengths on Pruneridge Avenue

Pruneridge Avenue Average Maximum Average Maximum
Pomeroy
Eastbound 20 280 200 1,340
Westbound 100 620 40 420
Cronin
Eastbound 0 160 20 280
Westbound 40 380 20 280
Woodhams
Eastbound 20 160 40 320
Westbound 40 400 20 240
Kiely
Eastbound 40 240 140 560
Westbound 160 640 60 380
San Tomas Expressway
Eastbound 60 280 640 1,360
Westbound 300 760 80 360
Saratoga
Eastbound 20 220 80 480
Westbound 100 500 40 200
Cypress
Eastbound 20 200 80 540
Westbound 40 260 20 160
Winchester
Eastbound 60 420 300 1,020
Westbound 40 200 40 180
AM Peak PM Peak
Queue Lengths (feet)
( )
:c:::
rr-,
>< >a-.

C)
:::z:

Santa
Clara
3UXQHULGJH$YH
6DUDWRJD$YH
0DXULFLD$YH
/DZUHQFH([S\
3RPHUR\$YH
/RV3DGUHV%OYG
6FRWW%OYG6FRWW%OYG6FRWW%OYG
1:LQFKHVWHU%OYG
)RUEHV$YH
7DQRDN'U
.LHO\%OYG
6DQ7RPDV([SZ\6DQ7RPDV([SZ\6DQ7RPDV([SZ\
:RRGKDPV5G
+RPHVWHDG5G+RPHVWHDG5G+RPHVWHDG5G
%HQWRQ6W%HQWRQ6W%HQWRQ6W
6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG
&URQLQ'U&URQLQ'U
5HGZRRG5HGZRRG
$YH$YH
5DGFOLIIH5DGFOLIIH
'U'U
&URQLQ'U
5HGZRRG
$YH
5DGFOLIIH
'U
&\SUHVV&\SUHVV
$YH$YH
&\SUHVV
$YH
0RQURH6W0RQURH6W0RQURH6W
LEGEND
0D[LPXP4XHXH/HQJWKV
$YHUDJH4XHXH/HQJWKV
$03HDN+RXU4XHXLQJ
IW

3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV
Figure 4
Baseline (Pre-COVID) AM Queue Lengths on Pruneridge Avenue ,....... ~[XAGON ........... 0
NORTH
Notto Scale
Santa
Clara
3UXQHULGJH$YH
/RV3DGUHV%OYG
6FRWW%OYG6FRWW%OYG6FRWW%OYG
)RUEHV$YH
7DQRDN'U
/DZUHQFH([S\
3RPHUR\$YH
1:LQFKHVWHU%OYG
6DQ7RPDV([SZ\6DQ7RPDV([SZ\6DQ7RPDV([SZ\
6DUDWRJD$YH
0DXULFLD$YH:RRGKDPV5G
.LHO\%OYG
5HGZRRG5HGZRRG
$YH$YH
5HGZRRG
$YH
&\SUHVV&\SUHVV
$YH$YH
&\SUHVV
$YH
+RPHVWHDG5G+RPHVWHDG5G+RPHVWHDG5G
%HQWRQ6W%HQWRQ6W%HQWRQ6W
6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG6WHYHQV&UHHN%OYG
5DGFOLIIH5DGFOLIIH
'U'U
5DGFOLIIH
'U
&URQLQ'U&URQLQ'U&URQLQ'U
0RQURH6W0RQURH6W0RQURH6W
LEGEND
0D[LPXP4XHXH/HQJWKV
$YHUDJH4XHXH/HQJWKV
303HDN+RXU4XHXLQJ
IW

3UXQHULGJH&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV
Figure 5
Baseline (Pre-COVID) PM Queue Lengths on Pruneridge Avenue ,....... ~[XAGON ........... 0
NORTH
Notto Scale
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH&RPSODWH6WUHHWV±%DVHOLQH&RQGLWLRQV$QDO\VLV 6HSWHPEHU

Table 10
Baseline (Pre-COVID - Left-Turn Pocket Queue Lengths

Storage
Length
Pruneridge Avenue (feet) Average Maximum Average Maximum Pomeroy
Eastbound Left-Turn 1 120 6 102 6 110
Southbound Left-Turn 1 250 11 81 16 92
Kiely
Eastbound Left-Turn 75 40 215 83 503
Westbound Left-Turn 75 44 543 52 346
Northbound Left-Turn 200 43 221 19 118
Southbound Left-Turn 130 25 160 62 402
San Tomas Expressway
Eastbound Left-Turn 1 150 195 493 73 237
Westbound Left-Turn 1 140 0 20 3 49
Northbound Left-Turn 250 586 1,660 58 226
Southbound Left-Turn 175 27 105 47 172
Saratoga
Eastbound Left-Turn 1 140 41 208 34 203
Westbound Left-Turn 145 143 499 29 164
Northbound Left-Turn 240 7 79 11 92
Southbound Left-Turn 230 8 74 15 108
Winchester
Eastbound Left-Turn 100 10 103 14 210
Westbound Left-Turn 1 250 11 95 36 179
Northbound Left-Turn 1 260 50 256 71 282
Southbound Left-Turn 1 150 4 72 15 171
Notes:
1 Queue longer than the storage length will be accomodated in the center turn lane.

Queue Lengths (feet)
AM Peak PM Peak
( )
:c:::
rr-,
>< >a-.

C)
:::z:

Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Project
- Working Paper #1
Technical Appendices

$SSHQGL[$
3HDN+RXU7UDIILF&RXQWV
$SSHQGL[%
$YHUDJH'DLO\7UDIILF&RXQWV
$SSHQGL[&
7UDYHO7LPH5XQDORQJ3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH
$SSHQGL['
,QWHUVHFWLRQ/HYHORI6HUYLFH&DOFXODWLRQV
$SSHQGL[(
6LJQDO:DUUDQW$QDO\VLV

ppendix
Peak Hour Tra ic Counts

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 1 POMEROY AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
127 131
298
225
00 236
305

0.94 N
S
E W

0.84 0.91

0.00 0.88
(190)(194)
(526)
(341)
(531)
(342)
()()
69 0
58 62
236
0 0
167
69 0
0 00
0 0
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
4 3
13 2
N
S
E W
21 85
3 1
2 0
4 1
0 3
0 1
4 0
0 0
0 3
2 1
0 1
N
S
EW
4 0
1 2
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 4 00 2 17 1 0 26 60 1 1 1 04010109
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 4 00 3 16 0 0 49 99 0 0 2 049801 7 01 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 5 007 2 4 00 4 7 1 0 0 0 1 1 0566050 1 2 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 18 001 0 2 7 0 0 6 8 1 4 2 11 3 162801 4 0 5 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 16 001 5 3 8 0 0 5 8 1 5 7 10 3 066101 4 01 6 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 16 001 4 4 9 0 0 5 4 1 6 7 00 2 302 0 01 4 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 17 001 7 3 6 0 0 5 4 1 6 2 12 4 001 7 02 1 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 9 002 3 4 4 0 0 7 0 1 7 5 01 4 101 1 01 8 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 000 5 80 6 769 166 0 0 234 61 65500 0 0
Mediums 000 002010 021 600 0 0
Total 69 167 0 0 236 62 0 0 0 58 0 69 6610000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

CRONIN DR CRONIN DRPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 2 CRONIN DR & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
00 284
203
5054
221
298

0.93 N
S
E W

0.00 0.89

0.66 0.81
()()
(502)
(306)
(524)
(331)
(76)(79)
0 0
0 0
266
18 36
185
0 0
0 032
0 18
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

CRONIN DR

CRONIN DR
6 8
14 0
N
S
E W
71 86
5 1
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
4 0
0 0
1 2
0 4
0 0
N
S
EW
1 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 00 0 18 0 0 30 52 0 1 1 33540030
7:15 AM 0 5 0 0 0 00 0 17 0 1 57 86 0 0 1 34293030
7:30 AM 0 5 0 0 0 00 0 19 0 1 50 83 0 1 2 34916020
7:45 AM 0 6 0 0 0 000 4 0 07 7 2 1 3 3 0 2 1 65387010
8:00 AM 0 4 0 0 0 000 4 8 05 6 3 1 2 7 0 3 2 15555020
8:15 AM 0 10 0 0 0 000 5 7 03 6 5 1 4 8 0 3 3 411 0 2 0 8:30 AM 0 9 0 0 0 000 4 0 05 6 3 1 3 0 0 0 5 09040
8:45 AM 0 9 0 0 0 000 4 0 05 7 5 1 5 0 0 2 4 111 0 10 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 32 0 17 0 0 00 183 36 17 265 0 55000 0 0
Mediums 001 000020 110 500 0 0
Total 0 185 36 18 266 0 32 0 18 0 0 0 5550000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 3 WOODHAMS RD & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
33 23
264
217
3519
197
270

0.99 N
S
E W

0.83 0.94

0.80 0.93
(33)(53)
(473)
(332)
(483)
(305)
(53)(36)
13 0
15 11
245
8 6
185
6 0
0 512
6 17
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
6 3
7 1
N
S
E W
12 34
3 3
1 0
3 0
0 1
1 0
3 0
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 0
N
S
EW
3 0
1 3
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 24 0 3 35 70 2 0 0 33550221
7:15 AM 0 4 0 1 1 00 0 16 0 1 45 71 0 1 1 24161002
7:30 AM 0 2 0 0 5 10 0 24 0 1 50 95 0 0 0 24791254
7:45 AM 0 3 1 0 1 103 3 4 02 6 7 1 1 9 1 1 4 05165110
8:00 AM 0 2 2 0 3 302 4 2 01 6 6 1 3 1 0 1 1 15291432
8:15 AM 0 0 1 0 5 001 5 2 05 6 0 1 3 4 0 1 3 10262
8:30 AM 0 6 2 0 5 102 4 8 01 5 5 1 3 2 1 1 3 13324
8:45 AM 0 4 1 0 2 101 4 3 01 6 4 1 3 2 0 0 0 32265
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 12 6 17 15 5 136 183 5 8 243 11 52400 0 0
Mediums 000 000021 020 500 0 0
Total 6 185 6 8 245 11 12 6 17 15 5 13 5290000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 4 KIELY BLVD & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
207 258
257
237
269177
211
272

0.93 N
S
E W

0.88 0.90

0.86 0.80
(454)(370)
(447)
(367)
(471)
(327)
(473)(325)
29 0
33 38
205
14 18
169
24 0
0 14538
196
35 0

PRUNERIDGE AVE

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
5 4
4 5
N
S
E W
31 13
3 2
3 2
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
2 0
0 1
0 3
0 1
N
S
EW
1 0
1 0
0 3
0 1
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 4 28 0 6 2200 1 8 03 2 8 1 2 8 0 0 0 16736751 7:15 AM 0 8 38 0 4 2403 1 8 03 3 7 1 5 6 1 0 0 37566843 7:30 AM 0 6 36 0 8 3004 1 7 07 3 0 1 6 1 0 1 0 08534865 7:45 AM 0 11 54 0 11 3506 2 9 03 5 2 2 2 8 2 0 1 0920544 1 4 8:00 AM 0 8 37 0 5 2807 3 3 01 6 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 294446 1 38 8:15 AM 0 13 50 0 8 4106 5 5 03 4 8 2 5 3 0 3 0 151 11 0 3 8:30 AM 0 7 48 0 9 4004 4 9 03 4 4 2 2 8 1 0 1 22958
8:45 AM 0 10 61 0 11 3607 3 2 07 5 2 2 5 2 4 1 1 071 2 71 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 1 0 0000 000 100 0 0
Lights 38 189 34 32 141 2924 168 17 14 202 38 92600 0 0 Mediums 071 040011 030 1 700 0 0
Total 24 169 18 14 205 38 38 196 35 33 145 29 9440000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

TANOAK DR TANOAK DRPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 5 TANOAK DR & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
13 17
264
247
00 244
257

0.87 N
S
E W

0.75 0.92

0.00 0.82
(23)(26)
(456)
(395)
(450)
(386)
()()
3 0
10 11
253
0 0
237
6 0
1 00
0 0
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

TANOAK DR

TANOAK DR
3 0
3 0
N
S
E W
00 21
2 1
0 0
2 0
0 1
0 1
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 6
0 3
N
S
EW
0 2
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 2 00 1 29 0 0 40 74 0 0 1 03470200
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 2 00 0 27 0 0 50 80 0 0 1 03840001
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 00 0 35 0 0 45 84 0 0 3 24530201
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 2 000 5 0 00 5 2 1 0 9 1 0 1 04970104
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 4 001 4 3 00 6 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 05210000
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 3 003 7 1 00 6 9 1 4 9 0 0 0 00300
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 3 000 6 4 00 5 6 1 2 8 0 0 2 30302
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 012 5 9 00 6 5 1 3 3 0 0 1 00501
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 000 1 0036 234 0 0 250 11 51510 0 0
Mediums 000 000030 030 600 0 0
Total 6 237 0 0 253 11 0 0 0 10 0 3 5211000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

SAN TOMAS EXPY SAN TOMAS EXPYPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 6 SAN TOMAS EXPY & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
727 866
216
214
827670
245
265

0.89 N
S
E W

0.77 0.89

0.91 0.83
(1,703)(1,235)
(379)
(327)
(456)
(393)
(1,630)(1,151)
43 3
85 93
123
0 74
123
48 0
0 59699
722
6 0

PRUNERIDGE AVE

SAN TOMAS EXPY

SAN TOMAS EXPY
1 1
3 1
N
S
E W
01 12
0 1
0 1
3 0
0 0
0 0
4 0
0 1
0 4
0 0
0 0
N
S
EW
3 0
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 12 124 0 4 8105 2 1 02 2 1 2 9 0 0 0 0 01,6224808 7:15 AM 0 21 218 0 5 10101 0 1 2 0 0 2 3 4 2 0 00 0 01,79281 3 0 9 7:30 AM 0 15 178 0 6 12201 1 1 9 0 2 3 2 4 2 1 00 1 01,87362 1 2 7 7:45 AM 0 12 220 0 20 13401 0 2 3 0 2 2 0 4 9 1 00 1 01,94219 19 1 11 8:00 AM 0 29 170 0 21 13507 1 8 00 2 5 4 6 0 0 0 0 02,01521 25 0 9 8:15 AM 0 21 199 0 16 11401 4 3 7 0 0 3 5 5 0 1 00 1 023 26 2 14 8:30 AM 0 26 165 2 26 14601 6 3 0 0 0 2 9 4 9 0 11 2 119 23 0 8 8:45 AM 0 23 188 1 22 20101 1 3 8 0 0 3 4 5 6 4 00 0 011 19 4 12 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 4 0 0 1 0000 000 500 0 0
Lights 98 712 6 85 590 4248 123 73 0 123 92 1,99500 0 3 Mediums 160 051001 001 1 500 0 0
Total 48 123 74 0 123 93 99 722 6 85 596 43 2,0150003
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

SARATOGA AVE SARATOGA AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 7 SARATOGA AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
248 232
246
250
253274
215
206

0.96 N
S
E W

0.90 0.93

0.80 0.81
(356)(436)
(433)
(378)
(361)
(325)
(399)(498)
36 6
14 13
158
75 3
163
49 0
0 19212
164
73 4

PRUNERIDGE AVE

SARATOGA AVE

SARATOGA AVE
2 1
1 9
N
S
E W
01 01
1 1
8 1
0 1
0 0
3 0
3 0
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 2
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 1 3 20 0 0 240 62 0 01 03 1 1 2 6 05 2 26310191 7:15 AM 4 3 22 1 1 320 61 1 01 32 3 1 3 4 03 1 1732044 1 0 7:30 AM 3 1 21 1 4 330 52 2 01 54 2 1 7 0 00 0 284701 1 48 7:45 AM 2 3 26 0 2 670 83 0 11 82 6 2 0 1 02 0 091222 1 04 8:00 AM 0 3 34 0 2 630 14 36 0 19 39 227 1 0 0 09620458 8:15 AM 3 2 50 1 2 510 93 3 02 14 2 2 4 9 30 0 113 2 47 8:30 AM 0 5 41 2 5 360 13 42 0 15 37 235 0 1 1 013 2 2 1 3 8:45 AM 1 2 39 3 5 420 13 52 0 20 40 251 5 0 0 113 2 28 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 1 1 0 3 0000 100 600 0 0
Lights 12 162 72 14 188 3549 161 3 73 155 13 94700 4 6
Mediums 010 011020 130 900 0 0
Total 49 163 3 75 158 13 12 164 73 14 192 36 9620046
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

CYPRESS AVE CYPRESS AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 8 CYPRESS AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
50 38
214
238
5133
237
243

0.94 N
S
E W

0.81 0.96

0.91 0.86
(59)(89)
(371)
(378)
(420)
(365)
(91)(59)
25 0
14 10
196
8 14
215
8 0
0 1122
20 9
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

CYPRESS AVE

CYPRESS AVE
4 3
1 3
N
S
E W
30 01
3 1
3 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 4
0 4
0 0
N
S
EW
3 0
1 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 5 2 0 0 40 1 18 0 1 28 67 0 0 0 03643122
7:15 AM 0 4 1 0 2 20 0 25 0 0 34 75 0 0 1 14181213
7:30 AM 0 8 2 0 5 300 3 1 03 4 9 1 1 0 1 2 6 04833132
7:45 AM 0 3 6 0 6 401 4 4 01 3 3 1 1 2 0 2 1 05171436
8:00 AM 0 5 4 0 3 500 3 8 02 4 7 1 2 1 1 2 0 15525318
8:15 AM 0 5 6 0 2 301 5 6 02 5 2 1 4 0 0 0 1 24225
8:30 AM 0 6 4 0 4 102 6 5 02 4 6 1 4 4 0 0 0 02345
8:45 AM 0 6 6 0 5 205 5 6 02 5 1 1 4 7 2 1 0 13227
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1010 000 200 0 0
Lights 22 20 9 14 11 248 212 14 8 193 9 54400 0 0
Mediums 000 000020 031 600 0 0
Total 8 215 14 8 196 10 22 20 9 14 11 25 5520000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

LOS PADRES BLVD LOS PADRES BLVDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 9 LOS PADRES BLVD & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
35 36
210
249
1412
243
205

0.85 N
S
E W

0.93 0.86

0.58 0.75
(57)(63)
(368)
(403)
(355)
(380)
(21)(17)
8 0
23 24
185
1 7
222
11 0
3 49
1 4
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

LOS PADRES BLVD

LOS PADRES BLVD
3 0
5 1
N
S
E W
00 05
2 1
1 0
3 0
0 0
0 1
3 0
0 0
0 1
0 5
0 0
N
S
EW
3 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 3 00 0 22 0 0 30 60 2 0 0 03301111
7:15 AM 0 1 0 0 5 00 0 25 0 0 34 66 0 0 2 03760100
7:30 AM 0 1 1 0 10 00 0 29 0 0 49 97 0 0 0 24371600
7:45 AM 0 1 1 0 9 025 5 0 01 3 1 1 0 7 0 0 4 34612500
8:00 AM 0 2 1 0 9 023 3 4 00 4 9 1 0 6 0 0 1 15021410
8:15 AM 0 2 0 0 7 102 5 0 00 5 2 1 2 7 1 0 1 12911
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 2 114 6 3 01 4 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 10412
8:45 AM 0 5 0 0 5 202 7 5 00 4 2 1 4 8 0 0 3 04715
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0010 000 100 0 0
Lights 814 2 33811 219 7 1 181 23 49230 0 0
Mediums 100 010020 041 900 0 0
Total 11 222 7 1 185 24 9 1 4 23 4 8 5023000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

WINCHESTER BLVD WINCHESTER BLVDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 10 WINCHESTER BLVD & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
183 191
252
203
260305
231
227

0.79 N
S
E W

0.79 0.50

0.65 0.83
(387)(308)
(390)
(350)
(381)
(382)
(507)(469)
32 0
20 20
123
109
65 142
24 0
0 13172
147
41 0

PRUNERIDGE AVE

WINCHESTER BLVD

WINCHESTER BLVD
1 4
7 7
N
S
E W
13 34
0 1
3 4
3 1
0 1
1 0
4 1
0 1
0 2
0 2
2 0
N
S
EW
3 0
0 2
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 4 21 0 3 2201 2 1 05 2 5 1 2 2 1 0 2 06616464 7:15 AM 0 6 19 0 3 1200 2 1 03 1 8 1 0 3 0 1 0 07375286 7:30 AM 0 15 105 0 5 280 23 0 01 12 8 2 4 6 31 1 08587366 7:45 AM 0 11 36 0 2 290 23 2 01 22 6 1 9 0 20 0 082324 1 10 5 8:00 AM 0 26 44 0 4 2704 1 9 06 3 2 1 9 8 2 0 3 092618 5 10 3 8:15 AM 0 20 35 0 3 470 33 4 01 03 2 2 2 4 22 1 117 5 10 8 8:30 AM 0 15 32 0 5 3207 4 9 08 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 014 6 9 11 8:45 AM 0 11 36 0 8 250 10 40 0 85 36 293 2 1 2 016 4 12 10 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 72 142 41 20 125 2823 142 64 109 121 20 90700 0 0 Mediums 050 064101 020 1 900 0 0
Total 24 142 65 109 123 20 72 147 41 20 131 32 9260000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 1 POMEROY AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
168 153
359
699
11 692
367

0.88 N
S
E W

0.84 0.92

0.25 0.84
(260)(284)
(692)
(1,146)
(691)
(1,121)
(1)(1)
79 0
89 71
288
0 1
609
82 0
0 00
0 1
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
7 6
50 9
N
S
E W
51 2921
4 3
7 2
0 3
0 3
2 3
6 0
0 0
0 7
1 5
0 3
N
S
EW
0 0
5 2
0 2
0 3
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 20 008 8 4 00 6 6 2 1 2 0 0 5 187802 1 01 3 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 13 001 1 8 4 0 0 5 5 1 9 0 12 8 196501 4 01 3 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 15 001 8 9 0 0 0 7 7 2 1 8 01 2 11,121080 1 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 21 001 4 1 2 0 0 0 7 9 2 5 8 14 7 01,21801 3 01 1 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 21 002 0 1 6 1 0 0 5 8 2 9 9 00 3 31,22001 9 02 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 20 002 0 1 8 6 0 0 7 4 3 4 6 44 1 6 302 5 12 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 25 002 4 1 4 2 0 0 8 2 3 1 5 31 1 6 011 6 02 5 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 23 001 8 1 2 0 0 0 7 4 2 6 0 21 1 5 101 1 01 4 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0010 000 100 0 0
Lights 001 8 90 7 982 607 1 0 287 71 1,21700 0 0
Mediums 000 000010 010 200 0 0
Total 82 609 1 0 288 71 0 0 1 89 0 79 1,2200000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

CRONIN DR CRONIN DRPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 2 CRONIN DR & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
11 340
659
82106
701
358

0.89 N
S
E W

0.25 0.93

0.85 0.83
(2)(1)
(658)
(1,060)
(700)
(1,143)
(173)(213)
1 0
0 1
303
36 70
631
0 0
0 054
0 28
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

CRONIN DR

CRONIN DR
25 18
19 0
N
S
E W
810
118
11 14
0 0
3 0
0 0
3 0
4 0
1 0
2 3
0 4
5 0
N
S
EW
3 0
0 3
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 21 0 0 0 001 8 5 06 7 1 2 1 3 0 3 5 685119 0 10 0 4:15 PM 0 11 0 0 0 000 8 2 06 5 6 1 8 0 0 5 7 291013 0 12 0 4:30 PM 0 10 0 0 0 000 7 8 07 8 0 2 0 3 1 5 7 21,04721 0 7 0 4:45 PM 0 9 0 0 0 000 1 3 5 09 8 3 2 5 5 0 6 6 61,12414 0 5 0 5:00 PM 0 10 0 0 0 000 1 5 4 09 6 9 2 7 2 0 3 4 1 01,12418 0 11 1 5:15 PM 0 16 0 0 0 000 1 8 4 09 7 5 3 1 7 0 4 4 327 1 5 0 5:30 PM 0 19 0 0 0 000 1 5 8 09 7 6 2 8 0 0 5 5 611 0 7 0 5:45 PM 0 10 0 0 0 000 1 1 7 09 8 3 2 5 5 0 7 5 826 0 10 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0010 000 100 0 0
Lights 54 0 28 0 0 10 630 69 36 302 1 1,12100 0 0
Mediums 000 000001 010 200 0 0
Total 0 631 70 36 303 1 54 0 28 0 0 1 1,1240000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 3 WOODHAMS RD & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
50 46
333
629
5952
619
334

0.90 N
S
E W

0.96 0.94

0.77 0.86
(91)(89)
(659)
(1,022)
(652)
(1,016)
(106)(105)
16 0
20 24
299
10 28
583
8 0
0 1419
14 26
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
12 11
11 7
N
S
E W
92 56
3 9
6 1
3 1
0 0
3 1
3 0
0 2
0 1
0 5
0 0
N
S
EW
3 0
0 1
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 2 2 0 4 203 8 0 05 7 4 1 8 6 1 2 3 38183434
4:15 PM 0 1 2 0 2 401 8 3 03 6 2 1 7 5 0 0 4 08957451
4:30 PM 0 6 2 0 3 401 9 8 02 8 1 2 1 6 0 2 3 11,0157723 4:45 PM 0 3 1 0 3 401 1 3 1 00 7 6 2 4 1 2 5 1 21,0614666 5:00 PM 0 6 3 0 9 200 1 5 6 06 6 8 2 6 3 1 1 1 51,0523532 5:15 PM 0 4 3 0 4 402 1 6 5 02 8 0 2 9 5 1 2 1 212 7 7 5 5:30 PM 0 6 7 0 4 405 1 3 1 02 7 5 2 6 2 3 3 8 396 1 03 5:45 PM 0 4 11 0 4 304 1 0 2 05 7 5 2 3 2 2 1 2 78475
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 19 14 26 20 14 168 583 28 10 299 24 1,06100 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 8 583 28 10 299 24 19 14 26 20 14 16 1,0610000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 4 KIELY BLVD & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM
388 419
347
638
467379
608
374

0.95 N
S
E W

0.88 0.93

0.91 0.91
(756)(742)
(641)
(1,060)
(688)
(1,010)
(835)(724)
56 0
51 48
261
38 60
506
42 0
0 28157
329
81 0

PRUNERIDGE AVE

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
6 12
2 8
N
S
E W
210
02 2 4
6 2
5 1
1 0
1 0
4 0
2 2
0 0
0 1
1 0
N
S
EW
5 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 11 72 0 18 650 66 8 01 15 1 3 5 0 11 0 01,43816 8 12 12 4:15 PM 0 11 63 0 19 6307 6 3 09 5 1 3 2 0 0 1 2 01,56213 4 12 5 4:30 PM 0 8 65 0 17 7008 6 9 08 5 7 3 4 7 0 2 0 01,71614 9 13 9 4:45 PM 0 18 82 0 8 7001 0 1 0 9 0 6 6 8 4 2 1 22 0 11,81091 91 01 2 5:00 PM 0 10 77 0 13 830 1 4 1 4 2 01 55 5 4 7 4 23 0 11,79014 9 28 14 5:15 PM 0 14 92 0 19 670 1 1 1 3 4 01 06 9 4 7 4 15 0 122 7 23 6 5:30 PM 0 15 78 0 11 6107 1 2 1 07 6 9 4 4 1 3 2 2 315 13 20 24 5:45 PM 0 18 73 0 8 500 1 0 1 1 3 01 16 3 4 0 1 12 2 215 12 10 18 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 0 0000 000 100 0 0
Lights 57 324 81 51 278 5542 506 60 38 261 48 1,80100 0 0 Mediums 040 031000 000 800 0 0
Total 42 506 60 38 261 48 57 329 81 51 281 56 1,8100000 - ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

TANOAK DR TANOAK DRPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 5 TANOAK DR & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM
26 41
401
662
00 652
376

0.93 N
S
E W

0.72 0.89

0.00 0.88
(63)(39)
(683)
(1,076)
(649)
(1,066)
()()
4 0
22 29
372
0 0
640
12 0
0 00
0 0
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

TANOAK DR

TANOAK DR
2 0
8 0
N
S
E W
00 62
2 0
0 0
3 1
0 1
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 1
1 4
0 1
N
S
EW
2 1
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 001 9 2 00 6 6 1 6 5 0 0 0 07090301
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 2 004 9 4 00 5 3 1 5 8 0 0 2 18340500
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 4 002 9 8 00 6 6 1 7 2 0 0 0 09560101
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 2 003 1 2 0 00 8 5 2 1 4 0 0 1 21,0590301 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 4 002 1 8 4 00 9 1 2 9 0 0 0 2 11,0790702 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 9 003 1 7 3 00 8 7 2 8 0 0 0 0 00800
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 6 002 1 5 3 00 1 0 5 2 7 5 0 0 3 10801
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 3 005 1 3 0 00 8 9 2 3 4 0 0 3 00601
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 000 2 20412 640 0 0 372 29 1,07900 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 12 640 0 0 372 29 0 0 0 22 0 4 1,0790000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

SAN TOMAS EXPY SAN TOMAS EXPYPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 6 SAN TOMAS EXPY & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
1,545 1,085
379
579
1,0191,475
650
454

0.98 N
S
E W

0.93 0.91

0.92 0.88
(2,040)(2,918)
(674)
(958)
(744)
(1,063)
(1,865)(2,778)
106
2 145
167
198
14 168
408
74 0
0 1,292150
842
26 1

PRUNERIDGE AVE

SAN TOMAS EXPY

SAN TOMAS EXPY
2 0
6 0
N
S
E W
00 33
2 0
0 0
3 0
2 0
0 2
1 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
N
S
EW
2 1
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 19 164 2 32 27507 6 0 00 3 8 6 6 3 0 0 0 02,96623 26 4 13 4:15 PM 0 14 193 0 33 30902 1 5 2 0 3 3 5 7 2 8 01 1 13,20120 37 2 9 4:30 PM 0 18 207 1 31 28106 5 4 01 3 6 7 1 5 0 0 1 13,39336 27 4 13 4:45 PM 0 21 226 1 31 34701 1 6 2 0 3 5 4 8 6 0 00 1 03,59349 36 6 13 5:00 PM 0 16 230 0 39 28902 2 1 2 0 0 2 5 8 8 9 8 00 0 13,55446 44 8 24 5:15 PM 0 19 207 1 46 33102 4 1 2 4 0 1 4 0 9 2 0 00 3 034 47 10 36 5:30 PM 1 94 179 0 29 32501 7 1 0 2 0 8 4 6 9 1 5 00 2 139 40 2 33 5:45 PM 0 18 200 1 48 30002 3 5 6 0 0 5 2 8 2 1 00 3 155 40 3 25 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 3 0000 000 300 0 0
Lights 150 838 26 145 1,286 10674 408 168 14 198 166 3,58200 1 2 Mediums 040 030000 001 800 0 0
Total 74 408 168 14 198 167 150 842 26 145 1,292 106 3,5930012 - ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

SARATOGA AVE SARATOGA AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 7 SARATOGA AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:30 PM - 05:45 PM
365 484
375
621
506339
552
354

0.93 N
S
E W

0.95 0.84

0.90 0.89
(838)(712)
(701)
(1,089)
(637)
(937)
(888)(674)
65 14
33 18
281
76 6
422
123
0 1
2537
329
166
4 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

SARATOGA AVE

SARATOGA AVE
6 8
11 15
N
S
E W
71 65
2 4
9 6
2 0
3 0
2 2
2 0
1 4
0 0
1 2
0 0
N
S
EW
1 1
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 2 1 49 6 8 450 16 85 0 16 53 340 3 3 1 01,44017 3 7 1 4 4:15 PM 0 0 59 0 11 690 21 66 0 17 53 337 4 1 2 01,56403 2 5 1 3 4:30 PM 2 3 71 7 4 650 14 69 0 28 62 370 0 0 5 11,68009 2 2 1 4 4:45 PM 3 1 71 1 8 640 15 97 0 22 51 393 1 2 3 11,79415 3 6 1 8 5:00 PM 1 2 72 5 4 690 3 2 1 1 7 01 88 0 4 6 4 31 2 11,79803 3 9 2 2 5:15 PM 1 2 90 6 12 680 24 99 0 15 67 453 4 0 2 334 4 8 1 4 5:30 PM 1 1 92 1 9 511 3 8 1 1 4 02 77 8 4 8 4 34 2 128 4 6 1 5 5:45 PM 1 2 75 2 8 650 29 92 0 16 56 397 5 3 5 113 3 3 1 4 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 73 2 91 6 4 3 32 5 2 6 5122 422 6 76 281 18 1,79410 4 1 4 Mediums 002 010100 000 400 0 0
Total 123 422 6 76 281 18 7 329 166 33 253 65 1,798104 1 4 - ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

CYPRESS AVE CYPRESS AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 8 CYPRESS AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM
70 63
356
591
6587
617
367

0.88 N
S
E W

0.88 0.86

0.83 0.88
(112)(117)
(661)
(1,003)
(679)
(1,057)
(111)(152)
24 0
15 19
320
16 40
563
14 1
0 3123
30 12
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

CYPRESS AVE

CYPRESS AVE
21 12
6 6
N
S
E W
111
51 10 11
4 2
2 0
2 0
1 0
1 0
0 1
1 0
0 4
1 2
N
S
EW
1 1
0 0
0 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 4 1 0 0 402 1 1 4 03 5 5 2 0 9 1 0 2 083811 5 5 5 4:15 PM 0 4 2 0 4 703 7 3 01 7 5 1 8 8 3 1 2 29446427
4:30 PM 0 3 5 0 3 404 9 6 06 8 1 2 2 2 3 1 2 31,04610 3 4 3 4:45 PM 0 6 7 0 0 508 1 0 8 03 6 4 2 1 9 4 1 2 41,0865535 5:00 PM 0 8 8 0 2 1005 1 6 2 05 9 0 3 1 5 3 7 3 31,1089826 5:15 PM 0 4 6 0 5 603 1 5 9 15 7 6 2 9 0 0 3 1 1 011 3 5 6 5:30 PM 0 10 6 0 2 805 1 2 5 00 8 0 2 6 2 2 0 2 612 4 5 5 5:45 PM 0 1 10 0 6 701 1 1 7 06 7 4 2 4 1 1 2 0 28407
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 23 30 12 15 31 2414 561 40 16 320 19 1,10601 0 0 Mediums 000 000020 000 200 0 0
Total 14 563 40 16 320 19 23 30 12 15 31 24 1,1080100
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

LOS PADRES BLVD LOS PADRES BLVDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 9 LOS PADRES BLVD & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
43 66
375
603
2012
596
353

0.93 N
S
E W

0.83 0.92

0.71 0.94
(129)(82)
(711)
(1,000)
(660)
(992)
(31)(27)
10 0
30 43
330
1 8
567
20 1
1 312
3 5
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

LOS PADRES BLVD

LOS PADRES BLVD
21 1
16 3
N
S
E W
10 115
6 15
1 2
3 0
6 1
2 0
0 0
1 1
0 2
0 5
0 5
N
S
EW
0 3
0 2
1 1
1 4
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 1 0 0 6 025 1 0 0 00 5 7 1 8 4 1 0 1 07823712 4:15 PM 0 1 0 0 7 101 8 8 01 7 4 1 9 0 0 0 1 386301 0 1 6 4:30 PM 0 0 3 0 7 004 8 9 03 8 3 2 0 6 0 0 2 795201 1 1 5 4:45 PM 0 2 1 0 2 106 9 4 12 7 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 01,00041 5 0 2 5:00 PM 0 2 0 0 6 014 1 5 1 00 8 9 2 6 5 1 0 3 51,0341722 5:15 PM 0 3 0 0 7 003 1 5 3 01 9 1 2 7 9 0 0 2 421 3 2 4 5:30 PM 0 3 0 0 8 105 1 4 3 00 7 8 2 5 4 0 1 5 82914
5:45 PM 0 4 3 0 9 208 1 2 0 10 7 2 2 3 6 2 0 6 431 4 0 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 12 3 5 30 3 1020 566 8 1 330 43 1,03311 0 0
Mediums 000 000010 000 100 0 0
Total 20 567 8 1 330 43 12 3 5 30 3 10 1,0341100
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

WINCHESTER BLVD WINCHESTER BLVDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 10 WINCHESTER BLVD & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:30 PM - 05:45 PM
322 254
256
481
428490
575
356

0.96 N
S
E W

0.91 0.81

0.87 0.84
(505)(572)
(511)
(828)
(695)
(996)
(830)(881)
33 0
38 15
186
55 183
350
42 0
0 251137
197
93 1

PRUNERIDGE AVE

WINCHESTER BLVD

WINCHESTER BLVD
3 5
12 18
N
S
E W
32 48
2 1
12 6
2 2
2 0
3 1
2 0
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 2
N
S
EW
2 0
1 3
1 2
2 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 30 57 0 10 440 96 3 01 12 8 3 1 6 00 0 01,32837 0 15 12 4:15 PM 0 39 52 0 6 330 55 1 02 04 3 3 1 9 20 2 21,41638 2 22 8 4:30 PM 0 30 37 0 10 530 76 5 01 56 2 3 4 8 01 0 11,50428 10 22 9 4:45 PM 0 28 60 0 6 550 76 7 01 34 6 3 4 5 01 3 01,56844 5 10 4 5:00 PM 0 43 56 0 11 640 13 77 0 12 41 404 1 2 2 11,58145 6 24 12 5:15 PM 0 34 45 0 11 720 11 93 0 13 57 407 4 0 2 248 2 16 5 5:30 PM 1 28 54 0 8 520 1 1 1 1 3 01 64 3 4 1 2 70 6 049 3 25 9 5:45 PM 0 32 42 0 8 630 76 7 01 44 5 3 5 8 63 2 041 4 28 7 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 137 194 93 38 247 3342 348 183 55 186 15 1,57200 1 0 Mediums 030 040020 000 900 0 0
Total 42 350 183 55 186 15 137 197 93 38 251 33 1,5810010 - ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 11 POMEROY AVE & FORBES AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
132 141
50 40
133125
16 25

0.90 N
S
E W

0.92 0.82

0.90 0.83
(216)(196)
(89)
(65)
(38)
(31)
(192)(189)
7 0
23 20
11 19
4 3
9 0
0 1027
112
14 0

FORBES AVE

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
0 1
3 4
N
S
E W
10 30
0 0
3 1
2 0
3 0
0 1
2 0
1 1
1 1
0 1
0 3
N
S
EW
2 0
0 1
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 2 0 1 500 0 042 2 5 0 2 0 11774421
7:15 AM 0 0 18 0 3 801 0 021 3 6 0 2 0 22351110
7:30 AM 0 2 8 0 7 1101 2 042 4 6 1 1 3 12912511
7:45 AM 0 1 22 0 6 2002 0 012 7 0 2 0 1 332921 1 2 1
8:00 AM 0 0 23 0 6 2604 0 074 8 3 1 0 1 03311660
8:15 AM 0 3 30 0 9 2302 2 064 9 2 1 0 0 02344
8:30 AM 0 3 30 0 5 2702 0 052 8 4 2 1 1 00523
8:45 AM 0 1 29 0 3 2601 1 011 7 2 0 0 1 01620
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 7 112 14 23 102 693 3 1 8 1 1 2 0 3 2 800 0 0
Mediums 000 00100 1 10 0 300 0 0
Total 934 1 9 1 1 2 0 7 1 1 2 1 4 2 3 1 0 27 3 3 10000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 12 WOODHAMS RD & FORBES AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM
15 21
33 22
2329
31 30

0.80 N
S
E W

0.80 0.67

0.82 0.89
(27)(31)
(51)
(43)
(50)
(51)
(34)(47)
2 0
2 2
24 7
11 16
4 0
0 114
15 4
0 FORBES AVE

FORBES AVE

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
4 1
4 1
N
S
E W
10 31
2 2
1 0
4 0
0 0
1 0
4 2
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 0
N
S
EW
4 0
0 2
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 300 1 004 1 1 1 0 0 0650011
7:15 AM 0 0 1 0 1 300 4 011 1 2 2 2 0 2860001
7:30 AM 0 3 0 0 1 301 4 012 2 2 1 1 0 61014021
7:45 AM 0 1 1 0 0 200 6 016 2 0 1 2 3 31010210
8:00 AM 0 1 4 0 0 302 4 02 1 0 3 2 0 1 2 11023120
8:15 AM 0 0 5 0 0 301 4 016 2 7 0 0 1 03112
8:30 AM 0 2 4 0 1 200 5 005 2 2 0 0 1 33000
8:45 AM 0 1 2 0 1 301 3 043 2 1 1 0 0 02010
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 41 5 4 21 1 241 6 1 1 72 4 2 1 0 200 0 0
Mediums 000 00000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Total 4 16 11 7 24 2 4 15 4 2 11 2 1020000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 13 KIELY BLVD & FORBES AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
217 258
54 45
267209
18 44

0.86 N
S
E W

0.90 0.69

0.76 0.61
(450)(369)
(87)
(80)
(70)
(43)
(463)(362)
18 0
9 22
16 16
3 15
0 0
0 19010
236
21 0

FORBES AVE

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
3 2
3 3
N
S
E W
02 12
1 2
1 2
1 1
0 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
1 1
0 1
N
S
EW
1 0
1 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 29 0 1 2500 0 014 6 4 4 0 1 14061111
7:15 AM 0 1 50 0 3 3000 3 013 9 6 0 3 3 04643020
7:30 AM 0 0 49 0 3 3303 4 043 1 0 7 3 1 0 45030341
7:45 AM 0 4 51 0 4 5013 5 037 1 3 9 2 1 1 05342351
8:00 AM 0 5 42 0 2 3600 3 077 1 2 2 0 0 0 05560659
8:15 AM 0 3 57 0 1 4800 4 025 1 3 5 1 2 1 00564
8:30 AM 0 1 56 0 4 5400 4 023 1 3 8 2 0 0 33542
8:45 AM 0 1 81 0 2 5200 4 051 1 6 1 0 0 2 00663
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 1 000 0 00 0 100 0 0
Lights 10 232 19 9 185 180 15 3 16 16 22 54500 0 0
Mediums 042 04000 0 00 0 1 000 0 0
Total 0 15 3 16 16 22 10 236 21 9 190 18 5560000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

SAN TOMAS EXPY SAN TOMAS EXPYFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 14 SAN TOMAS EXPY & FORBES AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
691 885
79 49
864727
85 58

0.88 N
S
E W

0.76 0.80

0.90 0.75
(1,751)(1,168)
(152)
(76)
(106)
(146)
(1,704)(1,237)
20 1
14 25
22 32
37 19
28 0
1 65615
831
16 2

FORBES AVE

SAN TOMAS EXPY

SAN TOMAS EXPY
3 0
6 0
N
S
E W
00 42
2 1
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
0 2
N
S
EW
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 2 136 0 2 85030 053 2 4 8 0 0 001,4514710
7:15 AM 0 3 238 1 2 105030 055 3 8 1 0 0 001,6015824
7:30 AM 1 2 204 0 2 121064 048 3 7 0 0 0 201,63610 5 2 1 7:45 AM 0 6 240 0 2 1470 1 07 099 4 5 2 0 0 001,6849535 8:00 AM 0 4 193 0 1 14905 4 0 1 07 3 9 8 0 0 0 01,71971 0 2 6 8:15 AM 0 2 231 0 5 129072 065 4 1 6 0 0 119866
8:30 AM 1 5 195 1 4 1591 1 06 085 4 1 8 0 0 2013 3 4 3
8:45 AM 1 4 212 0 4 219067 085 4 8 7 0 0 328445
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 4 0 0 1 0000 000 500 0 0
Lights 15 813 16 14 648 2027 18 37 32 22 25 1,69000 2 1 Mediums 01 4 0 0 7 0110 000 2 410 0 0
Total 28 19 37 32 22 25 15 831 16 14 656 20 1,7191021
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 15 POMEROY AVE & HOMESTEAD RD AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
197 213
524
333
142131
333
519

0.92 N
S
E W

0.76 0.92

0.87 0.82
(304)(304)
(918)
(573)
(930)
(567)
(216)(198)
70 0
42 76
422
26 20
271
40 0
2 8525
97 20
0 HOMESTEAD RD

HOMESTEAD RD

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
3 4
0 2
N
S
E W
22 00
3 0
1 1
1 0
3 1
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 1
1 1
0 3
N
S
EW
1 0
0 1
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 1 2 0 3 20 3 38 0 3 72 135 0 1 2 18093215
7:15 AM 0 5 10 0 8 70 1 45 0 3 86 184 0 1 0 09431936
7:30 AM 0 5 8 0 3 150 7 60 0 1 106 233 0 0 1 01,066554 1 4 7:45 AM 0 6 22 0 12 172 8 56 0 5 88 257 0 1 0 21,12751 4 71 5 8:00 AM 0 8 21 0 12 151 7 67 0 6 96 269 0 2 0 01,19610 21 3 2 8:15 AM 0 2 28 0 4 231 17 61 0 6 114 307 0 1 0 122 2 62 1 8:30 AM 0 6 25 0 15 270 10 51 0 6 106 294 2 0 0 041 9 22 3 8:45 AM 0 9 23 0 11 200 6 92 0 8 106 326 0 1 0 241 4 92 4 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 04 0 600 0 0
Lights 23 97 19 42 85 6940 262 20 25 413 75 1,17220 0 0 Mediums 201 00008 0 15 1 1 800 0 0
Total 40 271 20 26 422 76 25 97 20 42 85 70 1,1962000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 16 WOODHAMS RD & HOMESTEAD RD AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
01 433
351
6038
331
434

0.92 N
S
E W

0.00 0.94

0.75 0.79
(2)()
(774)
(606)
(774)
(591)
(84)(67)
0 0
0 1
411
21 17
314
0 0
0 023
0 37
0 HOMESTEAD RD

HOMESTEAD RD

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
6 0
4 0
N
S
E W
00 22
3 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
1 0
0 2
0 1
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 2 0 0 0 00 0 45 0 4 52 106 0 0 0 26252010
7:15 AM 0 2 0 0 0 00 0 53 0 3 87 152 0 1 2 07375020
7:30 AM 0 4 0 0 0 00 0 64 0 1 83 158 0 0 2 57873030
7:45 AM 0 7 0 0 0 00 0 83 1 6 103 209 0 0 2 28095130
8:00 AM 0 7 0 0 0 00 0 79 0 5 111 218 0 0 1 382430 1 30 8:15 AM 0 8 0 0 0 00 0 72 0 7 101 202 0 0 1 16080
8:30 AM 0 4 0 0 0 00 0 65 0 3 97 180 0 0 2 11190
8:45 AM 0 4 0 0 0 00 0 98 0 6 102 224 0 0 0 17070
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 001 0 04 0 500 0 0
Lights 2 30 3 5 0000 302 17 19 398 1 79500 0 0
Mediums 002 00001 1 0 2 9 0 2 400 0 0
Total 0 314 17 21 411 1 23 0 37 0 0 0 8240000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 17 KIELY BLVD & HOMESTEAD RD AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
226 206
348
334
269220
354
437

0.86 N
S
E W

0.82 0.94

0.77 0.81
(354)(384)
(634)
(576)
(773)
(603)
(449)(367)
62 0
47 40
270
38 65
242
47 0
0 117105
119
45 0

HOMESTEAD RD

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
4 10
10 3
N
S
E W
37 37
1 3
2 1
0 0
2 0
1 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 5 14 0 6 170 5 34 0 4 42 152 1 2 4 2873681 1 0 7:15 AM 0 18 29 0 4 210 5 42 0 4 59 212 0 2 4 01,0035898 7:30 AM 0 14 25 0 6 210 9 52 0 8 61 230 0 3 6 01,09266 1 0 1 2 7:45 AM 0 14 27 0 3 3601 0 6 1 0 57 9 2 7 9 14 2 41,13014 2 14 14 8:00 AM 0 29 23 0 11 2001 0 5 7 0 87 4 2 8 2 15 1 11,19715 11 13 11 8:15 AM 0 24 33 0 13 210 12 62 0 16 62 301 0 2 5 219 10 12 17 8:30 AM 0 14 27 0 11 3901 0 4 7 0 46 9 2 6 8 00 1 113 8 7 19 8:45 AM 0 38 36 0 12 370 15 76 0 10 65 346 2 3 3 018 11 13 15 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 1 0 0 0 0 000 1 12 0 500 0 0
Lights 104 116 44 47 114 6245 234 60 36 259 40 1,16100 0 0 Mediums 031 03028 4 19 0 3 100 0 0
Total 47 242 65 38 270 40 105 119 45 47 117 62 1,1970000 - ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

SAN TOMAS EXPY SAN TOMAS EXPYHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 18 SAN TOMAS EXPY & HOMESTEAD RD AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
692 884
278
241
882688
397
436

0.89 N
S
E W

0.75 0.89

0.91 0.89
(1,774)(1,201)
(519)
(404)
(771)
(646)
(1,748)(1,165)
130
0 20
35 197
46 100
175
121
0 1
542108
728
46 0

HOMESTEAD RD

SAN TOMAS EXPY

SAN TOMAS EXPY
9 2
3 0
N
S
E W
20 30
6 3
0 0
2 1
1 0
1 0
4 0
1 2
0 0
0 0
0 2
N
S
EW
2 0
0 0
0 1
0 2
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 11 124 0 1 7001 7 2 2 1 5 3 1 3 3 0 00 3 01,86512 4 11 21 7:15 AM 1 12 212 0 7 810 21 25 0 19 38 494 0 0 0 02,05711 16 25 26 7:30 AM 0 18 193 0 2 1040 36 21 0 12 37 483 0 0 0 02,13281 5 43 3 7:45 AM 0 26 222 0 5 1230 23 32 0 10 46 558 0 0 0 02,17621 7 7 36 8:00 AM 0 28 173 0 3 1130 29 34 0 10 59 522 0 0 0 02,24933 4 7 29 8:15 AM 0 26 207 0 3 1020 33 54 0 12 45 569 0 2 1 325 8 13 41 8:30 AM 0 26 171 0 7 13612 9 3 6 0 9 4 3 5 2 7 00 0 321 10 10 28 8:45 AM 0 28 177 0 7 1910 30 51 0 15 50 631 0 0 2 321 13 16 32 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 1 3 0 0 2 0100 000 700 0 0
Lights 106 714 45 20 537 125119 166 100 45 188 34 2,20010 0 0 Mediums 11 1 1 0 3 5190 191 4 200 0 0
Total 121 175 100 46 197 35 108 728 46 20 542 130 2,2491000 - ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

LOS PADRES BLVD LOS PADRES BLVDHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 19 LOS PADRES BLVD & HOMESTEAD RD AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
90 71
194
216
5958
218
216

0.94 N
S
E W

0.87 0.92

0.80 0.81
(121)(156)
(352)
(348)
(392)
(343)
(111)(101)
26 1
22 12
177
5 12
181
25 0
0 4113
33 13
0 HOMESTEAD RD

HOMESTEAD RD

LOS PADRES BLVD

LOS PADRES BLVD
6 2
2 5
N
S
E W
11 02
2 4
2 3
0 1
1 0
4 0
0 0
1 5
0 0
0 0
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 5 4 0 2 40 2 21 0 1 27 69 1 1 0 04010102
7:15 AM 0 1 5 0 3 50 4 23 0 1 40 93 0 0 0 04760335
7:30 AM 0 1 10 0 4 140 2 31 0 0 33 103 0 1 1 05223014
7:45 AM 0 4 8 1 2 120 4 32 0 0 46 136 0 1 2 054736 1 08 8:00 AM 0 5 12 1 5 1401 1 3 3 0 05 2 1 4 4 12 1 05611226 8:15 AM 0 4 7 0 5 80 1 50 0 2 45 139 0 0 0 15264
8:30 AM 0 3 7 0 3 90 4 45 0 2 35 128 4 0 0 2162 1 1
8:45 AM 0 1 7 0 9 100 9 53 0 1 45 150 0 0 1 35235
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 13 32 12 22 40 2523 174 10 5 167 11 53500 0 1
Mediums 011 01127 2 0 1 0 1 2 600 0 0
Total 2 5 1 8 11 2 5 1 7 71 2 1 33 31 3 2 24 12 6 5 6 10001 - ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

CRONIN DR CRONIN DRMAURICIA AVEMAURICIA AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 20 CRONIN DR & MAURICIA AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
44 46
11 13
2832
33 25

0.73 N
S
E W

0.73 0.55

0.78 0.55
(70)(65)
(20)
(20)
(31)
(47)
(42)(53)
18 0
1 5
4 2
4 8
20 0
1 252
21 4
1 MAURICIA AVE

MAURICIA AVE

CRONIN DR

CRONIN DR
10 9
6 11
N
S
E W
45 24
5 5
4 7
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 101 0 000 4 1 1 4 0580100
7:15 AM 0 0 5 0 0 202 0 011 1 5 0 0 2 0711102
7:30 AM 1 0 3 0 0 501 2 010 1 7 1 2 2 0800310
7:45 AM 0 0 3 0 0 903 4 001 2 2 1 4 0 1980002
8:00 AM 1 1 3 0 1 301 3 000 1 7 3 1 1 01160112
8:15 AM 0 0 5 0 0 613 1 001 2 4 3 2 3 21114
8:30 AM 0 1 7 0 0 905 2 022 3 5 3 2 1 31114
8:45 AM 0 0 6 0 0 701 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 24 1 52218
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 1 0 0 000 0 00 0 100 0 0
Lights 12 0 2 12 41 820 8 3 2 3 4 10700 1 0
Mediums 111 01000 1 01 1 810 0 0
Total 20 8 4 2 4 5 2 21 4 1 25 18 1161010
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 11 POMEROY AVE & FORBES AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
202 177
62 76
154172
33 26

0.87 N
S
E W

0.81 0.82

0.82 0.69
(294)(350)
(106)
(136)
(50)
(54)
(260)(290)
15 0
40 35
8 19
6 12
15 0
0 1473
127
24 0

FORBES AVE

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
13 15
19 11
N
S
E W
114
136
9 4
6 5
5 0
4 6
12 0
3 3
0 7
0 5
0 5
0 8
N
S
EW
5 0
1 4
2 10
8 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 2 23 0 5 3201 3 032 8 7 3 4 3 23191654
4:15 PM 0 2 19 0 12 2604 2 034 8 3 1 0 7 13440722
4:30 PM 0 1 21 0 7 1502 4 030 6 8 3 0 1 13902652
4:45 PM 0 1 20 0 9 3001 1 030 8 1 1 5 5 64310754
5:00 PM 0 0 35 0 12 3401 4 0 1 02 1 1 2 1 0 6 24511742
5:15 PM 0 2 39 0 14 4405 1 012 1 2 9 8 2 4 32964
5:30 PM 0 1 32 0 5 3507 3 041 1 0 9 1 1 0 6 221 0 6 3
5:45 PM 0 0 21 0 9 3402 4 043 1 0 1 1 3 3 61986
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 3 127 24 40 147 1515 12 6 19 8 35 45100 0 0
Mediums 000 00000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Total 15 12 6 19 8 35 3 127 24 40 147 15 4510000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 12 WOODHAMS RD & FORBES AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:45 PM - 06:00 PM
41 38
39 51
5049
58 50

0.85 N
S
E W

0.81 0.81

0.66 0.76
(58)(69)
(77)
(96)
(93)
(101)
(90)(90)
11 0
3 3
28 8
14 38
6 0
0 2711
29 10
0 FORBES AVE

FORBES AVE

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
21 10
23 9
N
S
E W
82 158
17 4
5 4
2 0
1 0
4 0
2 4
1 4
0 4
0 5
0 0
N
S
EW
2 0
0 4
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 3 5 0 0 610 6 039 4 1 1 0 4 31494130
4:15 PM 0 4 2 0 2 300 9 029 3 6 0 3 2 51571130
4:30 PM 0 2 4 0 1 303 8 043 3 9 0 2 5 61654142
4:45 PM 1 5 2 0 1 700 6 022 3 3 1 2 4 51661123
5:00 PM 0 2 8 0 1 603 1 1 017 4 9 2 0 8 51885023
5:15 PM 0 2 5 0 1 502 1 2 026 4 4 2 2 8 36102
5:30 PM 0 2 7 0 1 800 4 018 4 0 2 1 1 81134
5:45 PM 0 5 9 0 0 801 1 1 047 5 5 3 7 6 52152
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 11 29 10 3 27 1053 7 1 3 82 8 2 1 8 300 0 0
Mediums 000 00111 1 00 1 500 0 0
Total 6 38 14 8 28 3 11 29 10 3 27 11 1880000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 13 KIELY BLVD & FORBES AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM
427 387
51 123
422390
36 36

0.92 N
S
E W

0.86 0.76

0.99 0.71
(718)(799)
(109)
(208)
(80)
(94)
(761)(757)
14 0
48 20
14 17
8 20
8 0
0 3658
359
55 0

FORBES AVE

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
11 9
2 10
N
S
E W
63 20
7 4
6 4
0 1
3 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 6
0 5
3 2
N
S
EW
0 0
0 6
3 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 1 77 0 9 10004 6 028 2 2 8 2 1 0 08454764
4:15 PM 0 3 65 0 2 7201 9 036 1 8 3 1 2 0 087132 1 16
4:30 PM 0 0 81 0 5 940 4 10 0 4 5 215 0 2 0 59215232
4:45 PM 0 0 89 0 10 8302 4 025 2 1 9 3 3 0 093625 1 43
5:00 PM 0 2 92 0 15 10502 6 054 2 5 4 4 3 1 191816 1 24 5:15 PM 0 4 88 0 11 9003 6 042 2 3 3 0 2 1 242 1 54
5:30 PM 0 2 90 0 12 8701 4 063 2 3 0 3 1 0 817 1 43
5:45 PM 0 2 80 0 7 7003 7 086 2 0 1 0 3 6 025 1 01
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 100 0 0
Lights 8 356 53 48 361 148 20 8 17 14 20 92700 0 0
Mediums 022 04000 0 00 0 800 0 0
Total 8 20 8 17 14 20 8 359 55 48 365 14 9360000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

SAN TOMAS EXPY SAN TOMAS EXPYFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 14 SAN TOMAS EXPY & FORBES AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
1,517 1,039
81 109
1,0431,529
135
99 0.97
N
S
E W

0.92 0.72

0.97 0.87
(1,920)(2,872)
(130)
(180)
(172)
(249)
(1,941)(2,920)
42 2
31 30
24 27
56 38
41 0
0 1,44233
966
40 4

FORBES AVE

SAN TOMAS EXPY

SAN TOMAS EXPY
5 0
6 1
N
S
E W
00 33
5 0
1 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 2
N
S
EW
0 0
0 5
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 2 5 200 0 2 303067 067 5 6 3 0 0 012,41610 3 7 5 4:15 PM 3 6 214 1 2 3270 1 14 055 6 1 7 0 0 012,51720 3 3 13 4:30 PM 1 5 214 0 3 314059 010 5 8 2 0 0 212,61310 2 11 7 4:45 PM 1 5 211 0 6 365097 078 6 5 4 0 0 002,72716 2 10 7 5:00 PM 0 4 258 0 7 32601 0 1 1 0 1 0 6 6 6 4 00 0 02,77616 2 7 7 5:15 PM 2 9 231 0 10 3940 1 87 051 7 1 3 1 0 2214 6 9 7 5:30 PM 1 6 236 0 6 371087 037 6 9 6 0 0 1213 13 15 10
5:45 PM 1 14 241 2 8 35105 1 3 09 1 0 7 0 3 0 0 3 113 9 9 18 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 1 0000 000 100 0 0
Lights 33 962 40 31 1,441 4241 38 56 26 24 30 2,77000 4 2 Mediums 040 000000 100 500 0 0
Total 41 38 56 27 24 30 33 966 40 31 1,442 42 2,7760042 - ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 15 POMEROY AVE & HOMESTEAD RD PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
247 250
542
710
180201
722
530

0.91 N
S
E W

0.88 0.88

0.85 0.92
(416)(423)
(1,005)
(1,320)
(1,021)
(1,355)
(304)(330)
64 0
57 77
432
33 42
618
59 0
3 12631
114
35 0

HOMESTEAD RD

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
3 13
5 8
N
S
E W
49 41
2 1
4 4
4 1
12 0
2 0
11 0
2 4
0 0
0 6
1 7
N
S
EW
4 0
0 0
0 2
7 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 10 10 0 14 181 17 148 0 4 79 352 4 3 4 21,40213 15 5 18 4:15 PM 0 3 18 0 11 180 9 122 1 4 116 355 1 0 1 11,48013 10 11 19 4:30 PM 0 4 23 0 7 100 13 136 0 5 96 334 3 4 1 01,59041 0 81 8 4:45 PM 0 7 18 0 14 252 14 134 0 5 91 361 4 2 3 01,69191 9 71 6 5:00 PM 0 3 34 0 15 341 13 155 0 11 106 430 1 4 0 11,68513 22 11 12 5:15 PM 0 12 33 0 15 370 19 155 0 11 128 465 0 5 1 011 18 8 18 5:30 PM 0 9 29 0 13 300 13 174 0 6 107 435 3 2 1 291 8 91 8 5:45 PM 0 7 21 0 7 210 10 136 0 8 105 355 1 3 0 211 10 4 15 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 1 0 001 0 00 0 200 0 0
Lights 31 114 35 56 126 6459 612 42 33 428 77 1,68030 0 0 Mediums 000 00005 0 04 0 900 0 0
Total 59 618 42 33 432 77 31 114 35 57 126 64 1,6913000 - ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 16 WOODHAMS RD & HOMESTEAD RD PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
23 589
667
7099
659
551

0.93 N
S
E W

0.50 0.84

0.83 0.94
(5)(3)
(1,073)
(1,271)
(1,015)
(1,255)
(120)(160)
2 0
0 2
532
55 44
614
1 0
0 017
0 53
0 HOMESTEAD RD

HOMESTEAD RD

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
35 1
14 0
N
S
E W
10 104
20 15
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
3 1
3 0
0 9
0 11
2 0
N
S
EW
1 0
0 9
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 4 0 0 0 000 1 4 2 15 9 6 2 6 8 0 0 7 31,13191 1 00 4:15 PM 0 4 0 0 1 00 0 142 0 6 117 285 0 0 0 01,21510 0 5 0 4:30 PM 0 7 0 0 0 00 0 137 0 15 111 280 0 0 4 21,2831180 4:45 PM 0 4 0 0 0 00 0 147 3 7 121 298 0 0 4 51,3178080 5:00 PM 0 3 0 0 0 00 0 161 0 14 146 352 0 1 5 151,32015 0 12 1 5:15 PM 0 4 0 0 0 00 0 147 0 9 167 353 0 0 0 890 1 70
5:30 PM 0 5 0 0 0 00 1 160 0 14 111 314 0 0 1 713 0 9 1 5:45 PM 0 5 0 0 0 00 0 146 0 18 108 301 0 0 8 572 1 50
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 1 70 5 1 0021 611 43 53 530 2 1,31000 0 0
Mediums 002 00003 1 22 0 1 000 0 0
Total 1 614 44 55 532 2 17 0 53 0 0 2 1,3200000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 17 KIELY BLVD & HOMESTEAD RD PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM
506 433
480
638
417423
661
570

0.97 N
S
E W

0.96 0.97

0.91 0.93
(825)(990)
(885)
(1,194)
(1,060)
(1,265)
(801)(862)
118
0 114
92 350
38 111
456
94 0
0 274102
247
68 0

HOMESTEAD RD

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
11 28
22 10
N
S
E W
1414
814
3 8
3 7
5 2
1 0
2 2
6 0
0 0
1 4
1 5
5 0
N
S
EW
4 1
1 3
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 21 61 0 21 930 24 105 0 9 64 475 2 5 1 01,90231 10 14 22 4:15 PM 0 20 54 0 13 7202 1 9 5 1 78 4 4 4 0 23 3 01,96023 19 7 24 4:30 PM 0 26 56 0 28 670 23 97 0 14 74 475 1 8 4 52,03226 21 16 27 4:45 PM 0 26 65 0 26 720 23 101 0 7 78 512 7 13 7 32,06429 28 24 33 5:00 PM 0 25 67 0 32 820 25 116 0 11 91 533 2 6 9 42,03928 22 13 21 5:15 PM 0 32 55 0 28 660 27 103 0 9 95 512 1 7 2 130 19 14 34 5:30 PM 0 19 60 0 28 540 19 136 0 11 86 507 0 2 4 324 23 17 30 5:45 PM 0 29 65 0 32 610 20 112 0 9 75 487 0 7 6 527 18 15 24 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 002 0 00 0 200 0 0
Lights 101 244 67 113 272 11893 449 110 38 346 92 2,04300 0 0 Mediums 131 12015 1 04 0 1 900 0 0
Total 94 456 111 38 350 92 102 247 68 114 274 118 2,0640000 - ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

SAN TOMAS EXPY SAN TOMAS EXPYHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 18 SAN TOMAS EXPY & HOMESTEAD RD PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
1,554 1,034
320
453
1,0371,547
626
503

0.95 N
S
E W

0.93 0.94

0.96 0.94
(1,914)(2,948)
(583)
(801)
(967)
(1,165)
(1,921)(2,935)
166
2 46
36 217
67 139
297
189
0 1
1,340119
807
110
1 HOMESTEAD RD

HOMESTEAD RD

SAN TOMAS EXPY

SAN TOMAS EXPY
6 1
6 0
N
S
E W
10 42
3 3
0 0
9 3
2 0
3 0
7 0
1 0
0 6
0 5
0 0
N
S
EW
4 5
0 6
2 1
0 0
0 1
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 1 22 181 0 6 2660 35 56 1 12 39 712 0 0 1 03,08041 3 8 41 4:15 PM 1 35 180 1 11 3061 39 69 0 17 46 790 0 0 2 43,22829 5 13 37 4:30 PM 0 22 184 0 5 2810 30 56 0 17 39 730 0 0 1 33,36533 9 14 40 4:45 PM 0 35 167 0 17 3300 39 71 0 14 54 848 0 0 3 03,51040 7 21 53 5:00 PM 0 23 215 0 11 2961 51 75 0 14 59 860 0 0 1 13,53733 11 32 39 5:15 PM 0 36 191 0 16 3640 44 81 0 14 61 927 0 1 1 137 10 28 45 5:30 PM 0 31 201 2 9 3490 42 63 0 22 44 875 0 0 1 133 5 25 49 5:45 PM 1 29 200 0 10 3310 52 78 0 17 53 875 0 0 3 336 10 25 33 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 1 0000 000 100 0 0
Lights 119 804 110 46 1,339 166188 293 139 67 213 36 3,52410 1 2 Mediums 030 000140 040 1 200 0 0
Total 189 297 139 67 217 36 119 807 110 46 1,340 166 3,5371012 - ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

LOS PADRES BLVD LOS PADRES BLVDHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 19 LOS PADRES BLVD & HOMESTEAD RD PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
149 140
293
358
90117
391
308

0.97 N
S
E W

0.87 0.89

0.88 0.90
(273)(269)
(540)
(633)
(565)
(682)
(185)(205)
41 0
25 17
257
19 15
316
60 0
0 8310
63 17
0 HOMESTEAD RD

HOMESTEAD RD

LOS PADRES BLVD

LOS PADRES BLVD
8 10
7 9
N
S
E W
64 43
2 6
6 3
0 0
8 0
8 0
5 0
0 6
0 4
1 4
4 5
N
S
EW
0 0
0 4
3 5
5 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 2 20 0 6 140 5 54 0 7 47 165 2 3 0 17534411
4:15 PM 0 2 17 0 4 2101 2 6 5 0 45 7 2 0 0 02 0 08214149 4:30 PM 0 4 13 0 5 120 7 50 0 1 62 183 2 3 3 0860295 1 3 4:45 PM 0 2 24 0 9 1601 5 7 1 0 14 8 2 0 5 58 0 3911261 1 0 5:00 PM 0 2 13 0 6 2101 0 9 7 0 56 5 2 3 3 13 3 09232246 5:15 PM 0 2 16 0 4 2201 4 8 7 0 46 7 2 3 9 51 2 1354 1 1 5:30 PM 0 3 15 0 9 2502 3 5 7 0 56 8 2 3 4 31 2 44979
5:45 PM 0 3 19 0 6 1501 3 7 5 0 55 7 2 1 7 05 0 3612 1 5 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 10 63 17 25 82 4060 312 15 19 252 17 91200 0 0
Mediums 000 01104 0 05 0 1 100 0 0
Total 60 316 15 19 257 17 10 63 17 25 83 41 9230000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

CRONIN DR CRONIN DRMAURICIA AVEMAURICIA AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 20 CRONIN DR & MAURICIA AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
112 92
24 29
5077
64 52

0.92 N
S
E W

0.82 0.67

0.75 0.79
(172)(205)
(48)
(51)
(103)
(102)
(107)(136)
39 0
9 12
10 2
10 17
37 0
0 643
43 3
1 MAURICIA AVE

MAURICIA AVE

CRONIN DR

CRONIN DR
24 23
18 20
N
S
E W
149
99 10 14
10 10
3 7
6 0
4 1
2 0
0 4
0 2
4 1
0 5
N
S
EW
3 0
0 2
0 4
5 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 14 0 1 1308 2 012 6 1 1 1 0 52122459
4:15 PM 0 0 11 0 1 1105 2 013 5 1 2 3 4 42150539
4:30 PM 0 3 11 0 1 1605 2 002 5 2 4 9 4 82322109
4:45 PM 0 1 8 0 2 1106 2 003 4 8 6 4 5 6235221 1 0
5:00 PM 0 1 11 0 3 1201 2 5 0 1 2 6 4 42 9 7250421 1 0
5:15 PM 0 0 8 0 1 1809 5 012 6 8 6 6 5 1 0361 1 4
5:30 PM 1 1 10 0 1 1401 3 3 0 0 4 5 5 66 1 42015
5:45 PM 0 1 14 0 4 2003 4 002 6 3 4 9 3 3140 1 0
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 34 3 3 96 43 937 17 10 2 10 12 25000 1 0
Mediums 000 00000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Total 37 17 10 2 10 12 3 43 3 9 64 39 2500010
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDMAURICIA AVEMAURICIA AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 21 WOODHAMS RD & MAURICIA AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM
18 29
16 13
1519
21 9

0.83 N
S
E W

0.79 0.53

0.67 0.66
(48)(33)
(27)
(18)
(20)
(29)
(29)(32)
1 0
1 10
5 1
2 9
10 0
0 163
9 3
0 MAURICIA AVE

MAURICIA AVE

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
9 5
13 7
N
S
E W
23 85
5 4
4 3
0 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 2000 000 3 0 0 11500000
7:15 AM 0 1 2 0 0 1000 001 1 0 2 0 20591202
7:30 AM 0 2 2 1 0 3012 021 1 6 0 1 10651100
7:45 AM 0 0 3 0 0 5025 002 2 1 2 0 10701120
8:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 4021 000 1 2 0 0 43681300
8:15 AM 0 1 2 0 0 4032 010 1 6 4 1 520111
8:30 AM 0 2 3 0 1 3031 003 2 1 1 4 340500
8:45 AM 0 0 6 0 1 2012 011 1 9 1 2 270203
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 393 1 1 5110 9 2 1 4 10 6800 0 0
Mediums 000 010000 010 200 0 0
Total 10 9 2 1 5 10 3 9 3 1 16 1 700000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDMAURICIA AVEMAURICIA AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 22 KIELY BLVD & MAURICIA AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
182 268
33 21
251184
28 21

0.88 N
S
E W

0.88 0.63

0.84 0.78
(473)(339)
(61)
(31)
(35)
(44)
(439)(344)
3 0
16 27
2 4
17 1
10 0
0 16316
231
4 0

MAURICIA AVE

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
4 3
0 5
N
S
E W
12 00
0 4
1 4
0 0
2 0
3 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 1
0 2
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 3
2 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 2 1 31 0 4 25000 010 7 3 1 0 003892601
7:15 AM 0 3 42 0 0 35020 010 9 2 1 0 014251611
7:30 AM 0 3 43 0 2 43010 000 1 0 5 1 2 014545512
7:45 AM 0 2 59 0 2 42020 001 1 1 9 0 0 034723800
8:00 AM 0 3 46 0 4 32040 011 1 0 9 3 0 0149421 2 3 1
8:15 AM 0 2 62 0 3 43021 000 1 2 1 1 1 015201
8:30 AM 0 4 56 0 6 45010 011 1 2 3 1 2 014401
8:45 AM 0 7 67 0 3 43030 020 1 4 1 0 0 016910
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 16 222 4 16 158 310 1 17 3 2 27 47900 0 0
Mediums 090 050000 100 1 500 0 0
Total 10 1 17 4 2 27 16 231 4 16 163 3 4940000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

RADCLIFFE DR RADCLIFFE DRPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 23 RADCLIFFE DR & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
98 269
190
21 199
280

0.89 N
S
E W

0.65 0.90

0.75 0.82
(11)(18)
(475)
(287)
(496)
(300)
(4)(3)
9 0
0 0
269
0 1
189
8 0
1 01
0 1
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

RADCLIFFE DR

RADCLIFFE DR
6 0
14 0
N
S
E W
00 86
3 3
0 0
2 1
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 3
0 4
0 0
N
S
EW
2 0
1 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 21 0 0 26 47 0 0 0 03180000
7:15 AM 0 1 0 1 0 01 0 19 0 0 56 79 0 0 2 33840001
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 21 0 0 50 73 0 0 0 34390002
7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 001 3 6 00 7 3 1 1 9 0 0 0 24742105
8:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 004 4 3 00 6 3 1 1 3 0 0 2 04790002
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 011 5 9 00 6 9 1 3 4 0 0 4 30004
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 000 4 4 00 6 2 1 0 8 0 0 4 00002
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 003 4 3 00 7 5 1 2 4 0 0 4 31011
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 001 0097 187 0 0 267 0 47210 0 0
Mediums 100 000121 020 700 0 0
Total 8 1 8 91 0 2 6 90 101 009 4 7 91000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

REDWOOD AVE REDWOOD AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 24 REDWOOD AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
01 273
217
2431
214
262

0.94 N
S
E W

0.25 0.91

0.67 0.82
(1)(1)
(477)
(329)
(467)
(324)
(39)(44)
0 0
0 1
251
19 12
202
0 2
0 011
0 13
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

REDWOOD AVE

REDWOOD AVE
12 1
8 0
N
S
E W
10 35
6 6
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
4 0
0 0
0 5
0 4
0 0
N
S
EW
3 0
1 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 00 0 23 0 0 33 60 0 0 0 33301020
7:15 AM 0 3 0 0 0 00 0 23 0 2 48 79 0 0 2 34001011
7:30 AM 0 2 0 0 0 00 0 28 0 2 47 83 0 0 0 34572020
7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 000 3 0 02 7 0 1 0 8 0 1 2 24932030
8:00 AM 0 2 0 0 0 000 4 6 14 7 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 15113130
8:15 AM 0 2 0 0 0 000 6 2 04 6 3 1 3 6 0 0 3 43020
8:30 AM 0 2 0 0 0 000 4 8 16 5 6 1 1 9 0 0 3 12040
8:45 AM 0 5 0 0 0 000 4 6 05 6 2 1 2 6 0 1 2 64040
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 11 0 13 0 0 00 200 12 19 248 1 50602 0 0
Mediums 000 000020 030 500 0 0
Total 0 202 12 19 251 1 11 0 13 0 0 0 5110200
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

LOS PADRES BLVD LOS PADRES BLVDFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 25 LOS PADRES BLVD & FORBES AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM
59 55
27 16
6386
60 52

0.93 N
S
E W

0.93 0.75

0.83 0.88
(80)(103)
(42)
(23)
(85)
(93)
(99)(149)
11 0
6 4
16 7
37 10
13 0
0 4225
38 0
0 FORBES AVE

FORBES AVE

LOS PADRES BLVD

LOS PADRES BLVD
4 12
8 6
N
S
E W
84 26
4 0
2 4
1 0
0 0
4 0
1 0
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 0
N
S
EW
1 0
0 1
1 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 5 3 0 0 2011 002 2 0 0 1 201411113
7:15 AM 0 4 5 0 0 6000 113 2 5 0 0 311752201
7:30 AM 0 4 3 0 0 16031 012 4 0 1 0 212049001
7:45 AM 0 7 8 0 3 11061 016 5 6 0 1 112098203
8:00 AM 0 7 12 0 1 12024 024 5 4 0 3 121968002
8:15 AM 0 9 9 0 2 8034 024 5 4 2 5 417204
8:30 AM 0 2 9 0 0 11021 022 4 5 4 3 2014 0 0 2
8:45 AM 0 7 4 0 0 15023 001 4 3 1 4 1010 1 0 0
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 25 38 0 6 41 1013 10 37 7 16 4 20700 0 0
Mediums 000 011000 000 200 0 0
Total 13 10 37 7 16 4 25 38 0 6 42 11 2090000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDMAURICIA AVEMAURICIA AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 21 WOODHAMS RD & MAURICIA AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:30 PM - 05:45 PM
62 62
29 37
5039
22 25

0.67 N
S
E W

0.70 0.58

0.60 0.65
(106)(101)
(51)
(63)
(47)
(48)
(94)(78)
11 0
23 12
11 6
5 6
11 0
0 283
39 8
0 MAURICIA AVE

MAURICIA AVE

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
23 9
15 14
N
S
E W
72 96
14 9
6 8
4 0
1 0
3 0
7 0
0 3
1 9
3 4
0 0
N
S
EW
4 0
1 8
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 6 0 3 6025 003 3 3 3 5 331313023
4:15 PM 0 0 10 0 2 7010 016 3 3 0 0 151243111
4:30 PM 0 1 5 0 1 6014 011 2 5 0 2 941170221
4:45 PM 0 2 11 0 2 6030 023 4 0 2 2 8 1 21534241
5:00 PM 0 0 5 0 3 6040 011 2 6 5 0 351632013
5:15 PM 0 1 5 0 2 3021 003 2 6 2 1 581503
5:30 PM 0 0 17 0 13 8004 044 6 1 2 4 161541
5:45 PM 0 2 12 0 5 11051 013 5 0 5 4 641234
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 33 9 8 2 32 81 111 6 5 6 11 12 16300 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 11 6 5 6 11 12 3 39 8 23 28 11 1630000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDMAURICIA AVEMAURICIA AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 22 KIELY BLVD & MAURICIA AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
368 455
49 67
447330
35 47

0.90 N
S
E W

0.91 0.69

0.93 0.67
(854)(732)
(94)
(108)
(73)
(61)
(818)(670)
18 0
49 41
5 3
24 2
9 0
0 30124
405
16 2

MAURICIA AVE

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
8 5
0 13
N
S
E W
23 00
3 5
10 3
1 2
1 0
4 0
1 1
0 3
0 0
1 0
0 0
N
S
EW
0 1
0 0
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 3 90 0 5 87041 010 2 0 8 6 3 048064724
4:15 PM 0 1 77 0 7 79000 001 1 8 7 0 0 048319931
4:30 PM 2 3 85 0 13 85011 003 2 1 1 0 1 0189331 3 0 2
4:45 PM 0 4 101 0 9 68010 000 2 0 0 2 3 0189521 1 0 4
5:00 PM 1 4 104 0 7 94030 000 2 3 3 8 1 038994826
5:15 PM 1 6 109 0 14 85020 012 2 4 9 1 3 0241 7 4 4
5:30 PM 0 8 98 0 11 64020 002 2 1 3 0 0 017966
5:45 PM 0 6 94 0 17 58022 021 2 0 4 4 1 029742
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 0 0000 000 100 0 0
Lights 24 400 16 49 297 1892 2 4 35 4 1 8 9 000 2 0
Mediums 040 040000 000 800 0 0
Total 9 2 24 3 5 41 24 405 16 49 301 18 8990020
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

RADCLIFFE DR RADCLIFFE DRPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 23 RADCLIFFE DR & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
11 28
336
641
31 659
339

0.92 N
S
E W

0.60 0.89

0.50 0.90
(44)(19)
(650)
(1,022)
(656)
(1,053)
(6)(6)
8 0
3 6
330
0 1
635
22 0
1 00
0 3
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

RADCLIFFE DR

RADCLIFFE DR
23 0
29 1
N
S
E W
00 1415
10 13
1 0
4 4
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 3
1 5
0 0
N
S
EW
3 1
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 002 8 1 00 7 2 1 5 9 0 0 3 57192101
4:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0 004 9 4 01 6 2 1 6 7 0 0 2 38141102
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 003 9 1 00 8 1 1 7 7 0 0 3 19200002
4:45 PM 0 1 0 0 2 003 1 1 3 01 9 3 2 1 6 0 0 5 29900201 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 017 1 6 9 00 7 1 2 5 4 0 0 6 1 01,0091211 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 006 1 7 8 00 8 7 2 7 3 1 0 3 10002
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 2 004 1 5 3 00 8 3 2 4 7 0 0 6 50113
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 5 135 0 0 89 235 0 0 14 70312
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0010 000 100 0 0
Lights 003 30822 634 1 0 330 6 1,00810 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 22 635 1 0 330 6 0 0 3 3 0 8 1,0091000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

REDWOOD AVE REDWOOD AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 24 REDWOOD AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:30 PM - 05:45 PM
12 363
627
2653
631
339

0.95 N
S
E W

0.50 0.88

0.83 0.88
(2)(2)
(676)
(1,021)
(656)
(1,023)
(55)(77)
1 0
0 1
328
34 19
611
1 0
0 010
0 16
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

REDWOOD AVE

REDWOOD AVE
18 1
13 0
N
S
E W
10 67
9 9
0 0
4 0
0 0
4 0
6 0
4 0
0 3
0 5
0 0
N
S
EW
3 1
1 2
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 6 0 0 0 000 8 2 01 7 4 1 6 8 0 2 0 37383020
4:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0 000 8 3 11 6 2 1 5 8 0 0 4 08287020
4:30 PM 0 3 0 0 0 000 9 1 01 7 9 1 8 4 0 0 0 29375041
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 001 1 2 9 04 8 9 2 2 8 0 0 2 21,0211031 5:00 PM 0 3 0 0 0 000 1 6 3 04 8 1 2 5 8 0 0 4 71,0182050 5:15 PM 0 3 0 0 0 00 0 170 0 10 71 267 0 0 0 59130
5:30 PM 0 4 0 0 0 00 0 149 0 16 87 268 0 1 7 47050
5:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 000 1 2 0 05 8 9 2 2 5 0 1 4 71090
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 10 0 16 0 0 11 611 19 34 328 1 1,02100 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 1 611 19 34 328 1 10 0 16 0 0 1 1,0210000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

LOS PADRES BLVD LOS PADRES BLVDFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 25 LOS PADRES BLVD & FORBES AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:30 PM - 05:45 PM
90 91
25 23
117128
71 61

0.91 N
S
E W

0.83 0.65

0.86 0.81
(172)(166)
(44)
(37)
(110)
(119)
(216)(226)
9 0
2 7
14 4
43 16
12 0
0 7938
72 5
2 FORBES AVE

FORBES AVE

LOS PADRES BLVD

LOS PADRES BLVD
6 24
27 17
N
S
E W
1212
1512
3 3
12 5
0 1
9 0
0 0
0 0
1 5
1 1
0 1
7 7
N
S
EW
0 0
0 1
0 0
7 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 1 6 18 0 1 16031 006 6 7 3 1 202428025
4:15 PM 0 7 20 0 2 14021 002 5 4 7 4 1 022444002
4:30 PM 0 4 12 0 2 17021 031 5 6 2 7 5026512 1 0 1
4:45 PM 1 11 17 0 1 14033 003 6 5 8 2 1 242928301
5:00 PM 1 5 15 0 1 18014 004 6 9 6 4 6230312 3 2 3
5:15 PM 1 8 18 0 0 19033 011 7 5 6 5 1 0216 1 2 2
5:30 PM 0 12 19 0 0 26053 027 8 3 3 9 707101
5:45 PM 0 13 20 0 1 16036 012 7 6 2 6 428213
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 37 72 5 2 78 912 16 42 4 13 7 29900 2 0
Mediums 100 010001 010 400 0 0
Total 12 16 43 4 14 7 38 72 5 2 79 9 3030020
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 1 POMEROY AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Saturday, February 27, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 07:00 AM - 08:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 07:00 AM - 07:15 AM
00 0
0 00
0 0

0.00 N
S
E W

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
()()
()
()
()
()
()()
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0 0
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
0 0
0 0
N
S
E W
00 00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 000000
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 000000
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 000000
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 000 000 000 000 00000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 1 POMEROY AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Saturday, February 27, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 04:00 PM - 04:15 PM
00 0
0 00
0 0

0.00 N
S
E W

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
()()
()
()
()
()
()()
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0 0
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
0 0
0 0
N
S
E W
00 00
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
8 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 000000
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 000000
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 000000
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 000 000 000 000 00000
- ...
_J L
t I ~J I L. L,'- I ' _, ~ -
- &' r
I 1 '1 , t re: J
7 ............... 1
~ ....

ppendix B
erage aily Tra ic Counts

Page 1 ends

Date Start: 23-Feb-21
Site Code: 1
Station ID:

ADT LOCATION #1 (POMEROY TO KIELY)
All Traffic Data Services
www.alltrafficdata.net
EB
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 0 2 / 2 3 / 2 10 1 500000000000 1 5
01:00 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
0 2 : 0 001000000000001
03:00 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
0 4 : 0 001000000000001
05:00 0 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
0 6 : 0 00 3 230100000000 3 6
07:00 1 104 8 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116
08:00 2 182 17 1 0 2 0000000 2 0 4
09:00 1 200 18 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 225
10:00 0 181 13 1 5 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 202
11:00 7 231 22 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 265
12 PM 2 247 22 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 277
13:00 6 252 29 1 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 295
14:00 5 255 31 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 300
15:00 4 305 35 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 345
16:00 8 3 6 4 2 81200000000 4 0 3
17:00 5 380 20 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 410
18:00 2 301 14 0 4 2 00 1 0000 3 2 4
19:00 2 169 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 179
2 0 : 0 01 1 1 250100000000 1 1 9
21:00 0 72 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81
2 2 : 0 01 4 710100000000 5 0
23:00 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
Day
Total 47 3496 284 7 47 8 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 3896
Percent 1.2% 89.7% 7.3% 0.2% 1.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 11:00 11:00 11:00 09:00 10:00 08:00 10:00 11:00 Vol. 7 231 22 2 5 2 1 265
PM Peak 16:00 17:00 15:00 13:00 13:00 18:00 14:00 18:00 17:00 Vol. 8 380 35 1 6 2 3 1 410

Page 2 ends

Date Start: 23-Feb-21
Site Code: 1
Station ID:

ADT LOCATION #1 (POMEROY TO KIELY)
All Traffic Data Services
www.alltrafficdata.net
EB
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 0 2 / 2 4 / 2 10 1 600000000000 1 6
01:00 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
0 2 : 0 007000000000007
03:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
0 4 : 0 003000000000003
05:00 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
0 6 : 0 00 4 910200000000 5 2
07:00 2 108 6 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 121
08:00 2 203 8 0 7 00100000 2 2 1
09:00 0 206 16 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 227
10:00 1 194 19 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 220
11:00 0 222 24 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 252
12 PM 4 268 31 1 41 1 000000 3 1 0
13:00 3 304 23 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 335
14:00 5 297 31 0 84 0100000 3 4 6
15:00 0 380 30 0 6 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 422
16:00 7 3 4 7 2 50220000000 3 8 3
17:00 6 430 28 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 469
1 8 : 0 04 3 1 390300000000 3 2 9
19:00 3 195 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 204
2 0 : 0 00 1 2 870000000000 1 3 5
21:00 0 83 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88
2 2 : 0 00 3 500000000000 3 5
23:00 0 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27
Day
Total 37 3837 270 2 50 14 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 4226
Percent 0.9% 90.8% 6.4% 0.0% 1.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 07:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 08:00 07:00 09:00 11:00 Vol. 2 222 24 1 7 2 2 252
PM Peak 16:00 17:00 12:00 12:00 14:00 14:00 12:00 15:00 17:00 Vol. 7 430 31 1 8 4 1 5 469

Page 3 ends

Date Start: 23-Feb-21
Site Code: 1
Station ID:

ADT LOCATION #1 (POMEROY TO KIELY)
All Traffic Data Services
www.alltrafficdata.net
EB
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 0 2 / 2 5 / 2 10 1 200000000000 1 2
01:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
0 2 : 0 002000000000002
03:00 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
0 4 : 0 004100000000005
05:00 0 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
0 6 : 0 00 3 920200000000 4 3
07:00 2 93 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107
08:00 4 2 0 6 1 01400100000 2 2 6
09:00 1 197 26 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 225
10:00 2 190 18 0 51 0000000 2 1 6
11:00 1 241 20 1 3 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 269
12 PM 0 275 21 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 305
13:00 3 259 27 0 8 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 299
14:00 3 282 41 0 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 335
15:00 4 311 32 0 5 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 356
16:00 4 375 35 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 421
17:00 8 615 44 0 10 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 682
18:00 3 317 14 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 337
19:00 0 195 9 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 207
2 0 : 0 00 1 5 580000000000 1 6 3
21:00 0 87 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89
2 2 : 0 00 5 610100000000 5 8
23:00 0 23 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
Day
Total 35 3958 324 3 66 10 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 4407
Percent 0.8% 89.8% 7.4% 0.1% 1.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 08:00 11:00 09:00 07:00 10:00 10:00 11:00 11:00 Vol. 4 241 26 1 5 1 2 269
PM Peak 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 15:00 17:00 Vol. 8 615 44 10 4 1 3 682

Page 4 ends

Date Start: 23-Feb-21
Site Code: 1
Station ID:

ADT LOCATION #1 (POMEROY TO KIELY)
All Traffic Data Services
www.alltrafficdata.net
EB
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 0 2 / 2 6 / 2 10 1 200100000000 1 3
01:00 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
0 2 : 0 005000000000005
03:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 4 : 0 005000000000005
05:00 0 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
0 6 : 0 00 3 520100000000 3 8
07:00 1 91 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103
08:00 1 209 19 0 3 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 234
09:00 2 189 20 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 214
10:00 0 210 33 03 2 0000000 2 4 8
11:00 1 282 20 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 309
12 PM 4 293 19 0 61 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 324
13:00 4 328 29 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 368
14:00 4 292 23 1 610100000 3 2 8
15:00 4 367 33 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 406
16:00 6 3 6 6 2 70100000000 4 0 0
17:00 3 486 21 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 516
18:00 1 362 15 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 380
19:00 0 251 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 259
2 0 : 0 01 1 6 960100000000 1 7 7
21:00 0 114 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 119
2 2 : 0 00 6 030000000000 6 3
23:00 0 55 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56
Day
Total 32 4202 293 2 44 9 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 4588
Percent 0.7% 91.6% 6.4% 0.0% 1.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 09:00 11:00 10:00 09:00 08:00 10:00 08:00 11:00 Vol. 2 282 33 1 3 2 1 309
PM Peak 16:00 17:00 15:00 14:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 17:00 Vol. 6 486 33 1 6 1 1 516

Page 5 ends

Date Start: 23-Feb-21
Site Code: 1
Station ID:

ADT LOCATION #1 (POMEROY TO KIELY)
All Traffic Data Services
www.alltrafficdata.net
EB
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 0 2 / 2 7 / 2 10 2 410000000000 2 5
01:00 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
0 2 : 0 002000000000002
03:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 4 : 0 008000000000008
05:00 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
06:00 0 30 1 1 100000000 3 3
07:00 1 60 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68
08:00 0 119 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 133
09:00 1 187 20 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 210
10:00 6 2 5 0 1 80200000000 2 7 6
11:00 6 328 12 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 354
12 PM 7 344 32 0 82 0000000 393
13:00 3 360 15 1 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 385
14:00 6 324 20 2 420000000 3 5 8
15:00 2 339 19 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 362
16:00 3 310 14 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 332
17:00 2 297 13 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 316
18:00 3 287 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 303
19:00 1 190 6 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 202
20:00 0 148 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160
21:00 0 94 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 99
2 2 : 0 00 7 710000000000 7 8
23:00 0 39 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
Day
Total 41 3846 222 5 35 9 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 4168
Percent 1.0% 92.3% 5.3% 0.1% 0.8% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 10:00 11:00 09:00 06:00 11:00 09:00 11:00 11:00 Vol. 6 328 20 1 5 1 2 354
PM Peak 12:00 13:00 12:00 14:00 12:00 12:00 13:00 21:00 12:00 Vol. 7 360 32 2 8 2 4 1 393

Page 6 ends

Date Start: 23-Feb-21
Site Code: 1
Station ID:

ADT LOCATION #1 (POMEROY TO KIELY)
All Traffic Data Services
www.alltrafficdata.net
EB
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 0 2 / 2 8 / 2 10 2 600000000000 2 6
01:00 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
0 2 : 0 00 1 000000000000 1 0
03:00 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
0 4 : 0 007000000000007
05:00 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
0 6 : 0 00 1 900000000000 1 9
07:00 0 44 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47
0 8 : 0 00 8 750100000000 9 3
09:00 3 141 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 155
10:00 1 214 15 0 3 00000000 2 3 3
11:00 6 252 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 274
12 PM 6 256 17 0 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 285
13:00 5 289 20 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 318
14:00 8 3 0 5 1 80200100000 334
15:00 2 315 14 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333
16:00 3 262 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 280
17:00 8 314 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 331
1 8 : 0 01 2 6 690100000000 2 7 7
19:00 1 171 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 179
2 0 : 0 00 1 1 860100000000 1 2 5
21:00 2 75 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83
2 2 : 0 00 4 420110000000 4 8
23:00 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33
Day
Total 47 3269 169 0 19 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3513
Percent 1.3% 93.1% 4.8% 0.0% 0.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 11:00 11:00 10:00 10:00 11:00
Vol. 6 252 15 3 274
PM Peak 14:00 15:00 13:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 14:00
Vol. 8 315 20 3 2 1 334

Page 7 ends

Date Start: 23-Feb-21
Site Code: 1
Station ID:

ADT LOCATION #1 (POMEROY TO KIELY)
All Traffic Data Services
www.alltrafficdata.net
EB
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 0 3 / 0 1 / 2 10 1 310000000000 1 4
01:00 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
0 2 : 0 002100000000003
03:00 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
0 4 : 0 006000000000006
05:00 0 14 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
0 6 : 0 00 2 940100000000 3 4
07:00 0 90 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103
08:00 0 201 19 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 223
09:00 2 198 13 0 9 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 224
10:00 1 199 20 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 000 2 2 7
11:00 2 228 25 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 262
12 PM 1 264 31 0 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 305
13:00 2 269 24 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 301
14:00 3 241 32 1 8 00 4 0 0 0 0 0 289
15:00 5 278 28 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 315
16:00 1 333 19 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 360
17:00 5 384 30 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 428
18:00 7 2 8 2 1 20000100000 3 0 2
19:00 0 175 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 178
2 0 : 0 00 9 880200000000 1 0 8
21:00 0 74 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 78
2 2 : 0 00 3 800000000000 3 8
23:00 0 21 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
Day
Total 29 3450 287 4 63 8 0 7 2 1 0 0 0 3851
Percent 0.8% 89.6% 7.5% 0.1% 1.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 09:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 09:00 09:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 Vol. 2 228 25 1 9 1 1 1 262
PM Peak 18:00 17:00 14:00 13:00 14:00 17:00 14:00 21:00 17:00 Vol. 7 384 32 2 8 3 4 1 428

Grand
Total 268 26058 1849 23 324 64 2 56 4 1 0 0 0 28649
Percent 0.9% 91.0% 6.5% 0.1% 1.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Page 8 ends

Date Start: 23-Feb-21
Site Code: 1
Station ID:

ADT LOCATION #1 (POMEROY TO KIELY)
All Traffic Data Services
www.alltrafficdata.net
WB
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 0 2 / 2 3 / 2 10 1 200000000000 1 2
01:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
0 2 : 0 005100000000006
03:00 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
0 4 : 0 00 1 000000000000 1 0
05:00 0 32 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
06:00 0 88 20 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 109
07:00 0 164 33 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 204
08:00 0 295 2 60700000000 328
09:00 4 243 24 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 278
10:00 0 210 23 29 00000000 2 4 4
11:00 0 188 39 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 232
12 PM 2 245 39 2 200100000 2 9 1
13:00 0 236 33 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 277
14:00 3 244 40 0 7 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 297
15:00 1 296 41 0 8 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 349
16:00 4 277 26 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 312
17:00 0 329 26 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 357
18:00 5 2 3 8 1 40400000000 2 6 1
19:00 0 155 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 168
2 0 : 0 00 1 0 190000100000 1 1 1
21:00 0 51 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61
2 2 : 0 01 5 220100000000 5 6
23:00 0 20 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
Day
Total 20 3501 429 7 68 1 2 10 0 0 0 0 1 4039
Percent 0.5% 86.7% 10.6% 0.2% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 09:00 08:00 11:00 10:00 10:00 09:00 06:00 08:00 Vol. 4 295 39 2 9 1 1 328
PM Peak 18:00 17:00 15:00 12:00 15:00 14:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 17:00 Vol. 5 329 41 2 8 1 1 2 1 357

Page 9 ends

Date Start: 23-Feb-21
Site Code: 1
Station ID:

ADT LOCATION #1 (POMEROY TO KIELY)
All Traffic Data Services
www.alltrafficdata.net
WB
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 0 2 / 2 4 / 2 105200000000007
01:00 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
0 2 : 0 005000000000005
03:00 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
0 4 : 0 00 1 000000000000 1 0
05:00 0 32 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
06:00 0 81 15 0 3 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 103
07:00 0 157 23 0 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 186
08:00 0 294 28 0 7 00100000 330
09:00 1 243 29 0 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 280
10:00 2 2 0 2 3 10710100000 2 4 4
11:00 1 202 39 3 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 252
12 PM 5 275 29 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 314
13:00 1 269 42 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 319
14:00 1 250 37 0 7 0 1 100000 2 9 7
15:00 4 272 41 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 320
16:00 1 261 31 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 298
17:00 4 329 25 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 361
18:00 2 253 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 269
19:00 0 188 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197
2 0 : 0 02 9 810000000000 1 0 1
21:00 0 68 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75
22:00 0 37 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 0000 4 3
23:00 0 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
Day
Total 24 3564 413 5 60 7 1 12 1 1 0 0 0 4088
Percent 0.6% 87.2% 10.1% 0.1% 1.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 10:00 08:00 11:00 11:00 08:00 07:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 Vol. 2 294 39 3 7 2 3 1 330
PM Peak 12:00 17:00 13:00 13:00 14:00 17:00 14:00 12:00 22:00 17:00 Vol. 5 329 42 1 7 1 1 1 1 361

Page 10 ends

Date Start: 23-Feb-21
Site Code: 1
Station ID:

ADT LOCATION #1 (POMEROY TO KIELY)
All Traffic Data Services
www.alltrafficdata.net
WB
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 0 2 / 2 5 / 2 107000000000007
01:00 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
0 2 : 0 003000000000003
03:00 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8
0 4 : 0 00 1 200000000000 1 2
05:00 0 23 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32
0 6 : 0 00 8 7 1 50200200000 1 0 6
07:00 0 176 31 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 211
08:00 0 254 3 20400100000 291
09:00 1 248 31 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 285
10:00 3 243 26 28 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 287
11:00 3 231 36 2 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 278
12 PM 1 264 36 0 12 10000000 3 1 4
13:00 1 269 35 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 315
14:00 1 262 39 0400000000 3 0 6
15:00 7 259 38 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 310
16:00 0 282 35 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 325
17:00 3 332 25 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365
18:00 2 241 20 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 266
19:00 0 191 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200
20:00 0 110 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121
21:00 1 72 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79
2 2 : 0 00 3 940200000000 4 5
23:00 0 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
Day
Total 23 3635 437 4 73 6 0 13 2 0 0 0 0 4193
Percent 0.5% 86.7% 10.4% 0.1% 1.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 10:00 08:00 11:00 10:00 10:00 07:00 10:00 09:00 08:00 Vol. 3 254 36 2 8 1 3 1 291
PM Peak 15:00 17:00 14:00 12:00 17:00 16:00 17:00
Vol. 7 332 39 12 2 2 365

Page 11 ends

City Council and Authorities ConcurrentAugust 30, 2022

City Council and Authorities Concurrent
August 30, 2022