Cities Index.
Agenda packet

City Council and Authorities Concurrent
September 27, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
September 27, 2022
Body
City Council and Authorities Concurrent
Pages
167
Original file
172.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santaclara.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: VISHAL SAKPAL Signature: __ V/_:r._'IJ_l/4_l_-f_'-/4_-K..JJ-._'/4_l __ Address:
1701 Triton Ct, Santa Clara, CA-95050 Date: 09/07/2022
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: Morteza Shafiei
f>UJ~Ja-• l¼o· 4u-,· Signature: ____ c,~1] ______ _
Address: 1721 Triton CT. Santa Clara CA 95050 Date: Sep-7-2022 Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents . We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: /OAlc:q .J 11J iA-o I
Signature: ~ c?Jz-v
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. 0 Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood. · CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601 ' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: X, Y\ 3 h~°' \-\o.V\ Signatu~ ~ ~
Address: I g4-3 l-t1 \\ebrcw1t ~L ):;\vrtG\ C.\q~ CA1'5rf;o Date: q IL q I 2-oz.2-- Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:

Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.

Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: c/to,1)Xv 2Ac~;)
Address: /llf4 H,1/e kt>""t JJl Date: 7 I I 7 / )o2 1,, Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.

Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: Yoyi'ni} 0
Address: (7J:y I~, //e trr)"t Pf
I
'-7. ~1'11 V1") U ~ L-iJ
Signature: ----1--· -~·~-------
/
Date: __ c;_· _
1 _
1 7~1_' _1, }_t,._
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:

Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.

Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.

Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate.

Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.

Financial Impact: The' 1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.

Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Address:

Sincerely, (\~
Printed Name: M \~~ \,r~ Signature: V\ c:~~
f\'-\ 1(\\ ·,\\_l)\,~ "( ~e• 9 / \] 12 2.

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
r-,\ ~ .. \_;J\ Printed Name:~----- Signature: \~ '--"" Address: __ -¼·\f\j_~ \\ ~\~J\ri'l'hA, "\
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: :::::,vV-1'-f ~ 11.- \->i 0 µ0~1:-.J~ Signature: _ 4 ...-J.,====~=------- Date: 0 '"1 / 1, } 2 - -z_
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPO, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Signature:
·v1 ~rt ¼ \
)
Date: 9 l ) , I I )
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center.

Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbo'rs during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name:

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: Z \A,Y) cQ_ \ Signature: J,1 ;{/v\JL: , · Address: , J 1 >""' /i 1
1 ~ e/?tWf\{ ) 5M-tR C<'.W:[A I c4 Date: 4 / { 1 / )fl l L.

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:

Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: __,_)1;\...........,,&'--..... C"""'Ja ..... ~_,.__ __ _ Address: / 7 rJ H l / (ehtl1tl:£
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:

Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely, -#'A n ..._
Printed Name: .,-, I LO !,Af EV/ A Signature: .?'~ /
Address: J ft)1- µ I L.1,,~~ I?~ T fl- S />rh ·-rA- C-~ Date: v/ IT/ 1--v- , q .i.1>5V I I
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:

Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: _~_...1_~_..___vM-'--'--'-....;;.c"Vl _ __,(J Address: I :[D 'l--
Signature: _4
H-1Lll?f?Pfh?T p1,,- S11-vi,-A UA--AA Date: q / ):f: /,z,1,, tf !;""050 I I Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name:~ I'-'-t. t,_;JJfl/;Vl A Signature: ---"----_a-+>------- <~/.

Address: l'hi-- H-1 t..--lkt; )M:V'I Pl::S:A-vir:8 UAft--A 1ro5V
Date: 1 1--:::r / 1..--z,., I I
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:

Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing. ~c,.,._., 1,-\.l \.\,o..-<L ~
Printed Name: ~ Signature:-~----------
Sincerely,
Address: __ \;_:7_-4_~ __ \*_" _\ \_C2.._b_'{""_~_'6_i'\_:\-_Q_L_____ Date: 9 ·- \ 1 ·- "L-L ~ ~~ ~~'---cJ\
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:

Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight. nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.

Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed . CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.

Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny ttiis, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: 7l'/Jl.,f1XI ~
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Address:

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name:f,trnn'.l/,1,lill\ Cbti'\ Signature: ~-
~
'. .. . , 1 , ~o.to
Address: jcp.o Hr/&brarr t f()a,drJ{lrt; C4oate: Vn/2022 Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name:

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: ~ '' t/( (1 Vf L 1
1 1/1
Address: /1 )l l·/:!l2br:Jv-il 'FL
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: No,.; "f..i'v,. I
l ->
Signature: / 12 .. ---/·v ~...,·-
Address: /i SL. /.-/.'lt~hr01--.f ~fv?J L&,,..f) (4 °s·.,1qoate: _4 ....... lr ....... n_/ ___ ·2-o __ 2-_1..._ Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: Sl\w1Ank. r"' b~
Address: 114 L Rt! kb>'A tat r L
<2J.

Signature: -~•/'"""·11v-~ ..... l½: _______ _
Date: (JC{ J 11 / 202.- L i
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely, . . , , \ '\) i ,
Printed Name Fy\i Cc \-1 b, b&-~h, ·~ Signature\\k~
. 9 -- C) 1\ 1) ' P' (/ c·\I ~ i Address: \ SV\ ·t,') 1.e /1§C,,./'\'1 : ,,. 2l~h, h . .. {AOC.- Date: (_Q f 1·1 lL Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: V 1~kL sJ j
Address: /°] g,' t\J [ \e ~ 1 C( ~'-~
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities • Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan :::~::~:::d ;~ :~:~:ic
1 ;,::•ive :i::~~e~De;~ l ~-Housing.

Address: 1106 /-/t'tldr04f et, SC. CA9Sofct>at~: 1/;z/2°22 r .

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before den~~ housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners. I
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HQ As complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from :
existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green. · We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Signature: -~=r ___ """"'~=----'-+------
Address: 1710 Hillebrant PL, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Date: 09/22/2022 Printed Name: Menghui Wang
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost . assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: Tianxin Wang Signature:/~ u)~
Address: 1710 Hillebrant PL, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Date: 09/11/2022 Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:

Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.

Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.

Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate.

Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.

Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.

Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name:

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:

Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.

Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.

Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate.

Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.

Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.

Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: /;)J,eA:- l,, eJ,1/Mc
Address: 1
1 "\'V\' - ld: (.l:e,bratnK PL
Sig nature: __.,,_1 A...,.k..-,,µ,. Al.,.,LMAu.=vf.,_1-'-\.. ____ _ Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing {abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely, J (
Printed Name: 41 :ccc:trlOM Signature: __ ft .... ~ ......... __ d;!_~--- (yl LJ l J l )fj r - ,J,--/)} o /:A / UJ I 7 fl "Z-,7..--- Address: l ~ ~ M I j r;~y~ d Date: _-_ l __ f/V_ ~~Cft1~vZJD
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: S-hi,itA. z~~j Signature:

Address: /~31 1-/i'//el»,-o.wl f(, Sawl'-.- tfaw..j Gt\ Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: ~ Ct I'\ D~ I'.) g Signature:

Address: l1]C~(lt,h~1v PlaCR I S"&b±1
er~~
LA, 1~W
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: ( kSS Ct V\ ~ VI\_ M.~ le
Address: \ 11 \ ~ A I <l:,vi,w-, t' 'f l 4- O.

S ~ t( Cl~YA_ Oft,
Signature: _Ch ______ NZ_l.__~_._L __
Date: $ff !9 l J_oz__u
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: Xu.AA ~h,u Signature: _,/2 _ _,__.,, ....... /Jh~-~----- Address: I 13t Hlllel,tl,!N;
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: Ho~v{l(vt>{ /1o C,l
Address: /f?/4 Ht/I ebtI~<\_t f/.

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
llA Printed Name: ____ A_C/JV ------- Signature:_ lft~_---, __ Address: ---1\-u.-i~-~~\,._\tLLl~Rhlv1 fl i )Cttif°' C (,W\ 1 (/,I Date: __ oj / 1_7---'-/_J_·, 2--_) Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown . • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood .

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so . We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: __,~,__lA_N_~~L¼'V ___ f _iM_· ~- Signature: __ 1_ ·-1) f-~_.f _~J+-'~1 ~ '-L.._ ___ _ PL1 Sw,-t-D\ c(c,..,i;.., (.,/>,, Date: 2ol2 /oj I 1 7
"I Sl>5°
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.

Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs com plain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely, l,1 OtD :J, /2-<:...-_.)
__,)
Printed Name: XJO")~\A ~ -- Signature: _,,,,,-·
I-\ : l \e b r M ni PL
7 D'l / 13' / ~-o?,) Address: I 1 ?·~ Date:

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPn, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: B,~u:r Lan Signature:_ Ji;.~_~ __7 __ _
Address:~ ij- H-,'llebrovit fl Date: 0 7 I I J / Z
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: lnou. Sb~ Signature: __ ~"""------·---
Date:

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: __ 1_\\~ ___ LJ_'v1 ___ _ Signature: __________ ~ _ Address: ( l C) \ (, ~vtt CV'\-\]1 olx, ~lv<\-U. °'°"~ Date:

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks . The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents , requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601 ' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners .
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: ~ J &a,U6j;, Signature: ~.._~
Address:/ 7t?3U/ll~~.&lvkf&tJAM7 Cit Date: ~~22-
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months . It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks . The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm , delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed . CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents , requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan' . As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ , a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents . We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: -;of-----......_ Ly d : C\ M __ , '_ Signature:.di12 Date: <j- 1- 2-,Dl L
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:

Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.

Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed.

CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project. Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.

Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.

Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Printed Name: _Zhihui Landau _____ _ Signature: _Zhihui Landau_ Address: _ 1707 Civic Center Dr, Santa Clara, CA 95050 ___ Date: _09/11 /2022 __ _ Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: --.,]___,_,.....,C ..... l{ __ ...,.¥t;:µ_ ...... c: ..... :)_ Signature: ___ /4,..__~--l-...... 1..,..;J..___~-- -04 i Address: /Jo tj Cut<. Ce0f-:-e1,, (Y1
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: 0k~a~ ~ Sig nature:.,;~
Address: l )11 u,'u~v ~~ ~ . Date: &f / t~ I µ)-2-
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.

Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.

Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate.

Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood .

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.

Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.

Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Develo ment by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: $1\j:B::i A ~H At1
Address: _l~J..+l ...... ;,____ ct ....... V ...... l=-L---....C~ ...... N'-"--"-'T(Dl..........__D~R=----- Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.

Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.

Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate.

Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood .

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.

Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.

Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
PrintedName: RAJA:N SHETH Signature:_~,._...__-~.:;...;..----- Address: l]l3 tlV(l Lf;:NTE&, DIC Date: Ol}-1 Z- 2.Q2 Z, Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: ---------- 1:Y"'J ~ ~
Signature: 6.,,~ L.,.,0 ::-:::X
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.

Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.

Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate.

Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood .

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.

Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.

Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: {jJ/ 1lf::r'/M'J /P,,Jf..[
Date:

Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
., Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. .. Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow wm worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.

Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car . ., Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block. sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan js better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.

CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.

Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners .
., Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.

We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.

Sincerely,
Printed Name: I\\ \GE- M anC:C)?O
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
05/25/2022

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
- MITH UN
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:57:35 PM
G0.01B
05/25/2022
1927400

SHEET INDEX

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

SHEET INDEX - GPA SUBMISSION
Sheet Number Sheet Name GENERAL G0.00 COVER SHEET G0.01B SHEET INDEX G0.02 PROJECT INFO G0.03 GREEN POINT RATED CHECKLIST G0.04 GREEN BUILDING ARCHITECTURE G1.01 SITE & SURROUNDING AREA PHOTOS G1.02 RENDERINGS, COLORS & MATERIALS G1.03 RENDERINGS G1.04 FIRE ACCESS DIAGRAM G1.05 PARKING PLAN G1.07 UNIT COUNTS G2.00A GROSS AREA CALCS CIVIL C1.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1.02 SITE PLAN
C2.01 GRADING PLAN
C2.02 GRADING SECTIONS C3.01 UTILITY PLAN
C4.01 STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN
C4.02 STORMWATER CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS C4.03 STORMWATER CONTROL CALCULATIONS

JOINT TRENCH
JT-1 JOINT TRENCH TITLE SHEET
JT-2 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE
JT-3 JOINT TRENCH SECTIONS

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
L1.0 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN - LEVEL 1
L2.0 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN - LEVEL 2
L3.0 EXISTING TREE PLAN
L4.0 SUPPLEMENTAL LANDSCAPE EXHIBITS

ARCHITECTURE
A1.01 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
A2.01 LEVEL-1 A2.02 LEVEL-2 PODIUM
A2.03 LEVEL-3-4 A2.05 LEVEL-5 A2.06 ROOF PLAN
A3.01b BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.02b BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.03b BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.11 BUILDING SECTIONS
A3.12 BUILDING SECTIONS
A8.50 ENLARGED PLANS -TRASH ROOM AND CHUTES
ELECTRICAL E0.01 LEGEND, SYMBOLS, GENERAL NOTES & DRAWING LIST E1.01 SITE PLAN - LIGHTING E1.02 PODIUM LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - LIGHTING
E1.03 SITE PLAN - POWER
E3.01 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - GROUND - POWER
E5.01 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM

PLUMBING
P0.01 LEGEND, SYMPOLS, GENERAL NOTES & DRAWING LIST
- I Ml THUN
IBCH IJI.ITIUHOV:$1NG
}--
~
I
I
I
I
I
C

PROJECT TEAM
OWNER

CHARITIES HOUSING
1400 PARKMOOR AVE #190 SAN JOSE, CA 95126
CONTACT: KATHY ROBINSON
[email protected]
ARCHITECT/INTERIOR DESIGN MITHUN, INC. 660 MARKET STREET, SUITE 300 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 415.489.4855
CONTACT: KRISTEN BELT [email protected]

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

FORMWORK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
2585 UNIVERSITY AVE, SAN DIEGO, CA 92104
619.269.4423
CONTACT: MIKE VAIL [email protected]

CIVIL HMH ENGINEERS
1570 OAKLAND RD
SAN JOSE, CA 95131
408.487.2200 X5636
CONTACT: ZEFERINO JIMENEZ
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

IDA STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
1629 TELEGRAPH AVE #300 OAKLAND, CA 94612
510.834.1629 X 102
CONTACT: STEPHEN DEJESSE
[email protected]

MECHANICAL ENGINEER GUTTMAN & BLAEVOET
2351 POWELL ST. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133
415.655.4057
CONTACT: JEFF BLAEVOET
[email protected]

ELECTRICAL ENGINEER GUTTMAN & BLAEVOET
2351 POWELL ST. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133
707.523.3010 x 311
CONTACT: VICTOR STEFFEN
[email protected]

PLUMBING ENGINEER GUTTMAN & BLAEVOET
2351 POWELL ST. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133
707-523.3010 X 303
CONTACT: ROLANDO JACO [email protected]

VICINITY MAP

PROJECT SITE
108 UNITS OF AFFORDABLE FAMILY HOUSING AND ASSOCIATED COMMON SPACES, OPEN SPACE AND WITH ON-GRADE PARKING.

PROJECT SUMMARY
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR, SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 SANTA CLARA COUNTY APN: 224-49-006 | 61,409 SF | 1.4098 ACRES
VACANT SINCE LATE 2016 / EARLY 2017 REFER TO C1.01 FOR EXISTING SITE DIMENSIONS

OFFICE BUILDING
BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: 28,950 sf LOT COVERAGE: 15,181 sf / 61,409 sf = 24% EXISTING: OG GENERAL OFFICE
PROPOSED: PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL PROPOSED: HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

SEE SURVEY DRAWING FOR DETAILS

ZONING INFORMATION
ZONING DATA:

PROJECT ADDRESS:

PARCEL INFORMATION:

EXISTING USE:

ZONING CLASSIFICATION:

GENERAL PLAN:

LAND USE:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

JURISDICTION: SANTA CLARA COUNTY ZONING: SANTA CLARA CITY MUNICIPAL CODE, ZONING CODE, & BUILDING ORDINANCES BUILDING: 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE FIRE: 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE MECHANICAL: 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE ELECTRICAL: 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
PLUMBING: 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
ENERGY: 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE

CODE AS AMENDED AND ADOPTED BY THE STATE BUILDING CODE COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA OCCUPANCY GROUPS: PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL (R-2), W/ SOME (A-3), (B), (S-2) SPACES OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS:
(PER CBC 508.4) R-2 | A-3: 1-HR B | A-3: 1-HR R-2 | B: 1-HR A-3 | S-2: 1-HR R-2 | S-2: 1-HR
TYPE OF CONTRUCTION: TYPE III-A & I-A
FIRE PROTECTION: SPRINKLERED PER NFPA 13
ALLOWABLE AREA:

BUILDING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION
TYPE III-A PORTION: PER 506.2.3: SINGLE-OCCUPANCY, MULTISTORY BUILDINGS (WITH ACCESSORY USES) AA=TOTAL ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA: 170,400 SF ALLOWABLE AREA PER FLOOR: 85,200 SF AA= [AT + (NS X IF)] X SA
AA= 72,000 + (24,000 X 0.55) X 2 = 170,400
IF= [F/P - 0.25]W/30
IF= [594.6/741.85 - 0.25] X 30/30 = 0.55
AT= 72,000 (WITHOUT HEIGHT INCREASE) NS= 24,000 F= 594.6' P= 741.85' W= 30 SA= 2 TYPE I PORTION: UNLIMITED FOR S-2, A-3, B, AND R-2 ACCESSORY ALLOWABLE HEIGHT 5 STORIES PER TABLE 504.4, TYPE IIIA R-2 65' PER TABLE 504.3, TYPE IIIA R-2 WITH AREA INCREASE (MAXIMUM STORIES AND HEIGHT TO BE MEASURED OVER TYPE I PODIUM) SPECIAL PROVISIONS: CBC 510.4 PARKING BENEATH GROUP R: NUMBER OF TYPE IIIA STORIES TO START ABOVE THE TYPE I GARAGE. CBC 510.2 HORIZONTAL BUILDING SEPARATION ALLOWANCE: TYPE I PORTION CONSIDERED A SEPARATE BUILDING FOR THE PURPOSES OF AREA CALCULATIONS. CBC 1009.2 HORIZONTAL EXITS: IN BUILDING PROVIDED WITH SPRINKLER SYSTEM, THE ELEVATOR SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED ON FLOORS PROVIDED WITH HORIZONTAL EXITS.

CBC 31.04 A PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY: BUILDINGS CONNECTED BY PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE SEPARATE STRUCTURES, AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION.

CBC 31.04.5.2 ALTERNATIVE SEPARATION: DISTANCE BETWEEN CONNECTED BUILDINGS ARE OVER 10', AND BOTH THE BUILDINGS AND WALKWAY ARE PROVIDED WITH SPRINKLER.

REQUIRED RATING: SHAFTS: 2 HOURS
EXIT STAIR ENCLOSURES: 2 HOURS HORIZONTAL EXIT: 2 HOURS SQUARE FOOTAGE: SEE G2.00A.

EGRESS: SEE CODE SUMMARY SHEET. G2.01 THROUGH G2.05
EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE WINDOWS: CBC 1030.1 EXCEPTION 1, RESCUE WINDOWS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR TYPE IIIA CONSTRUCTION EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN APPROVED SPRINKLER SYSTEM.

ACCESSIBILITY: 100% OF THE UNITS ARE ADAPTABLE AND COMPLY WITH 2019 CBC SECTION 11A. 15% (17) OF THE UNITS HAVE ADDED MOBILITY FEATURES PER 2010 ADA & FHA GUIDELINES. 5% (6) OF THE UNITS WILL HAVE ADDED COMMUNICATION FEATURES PER 2010 ADA & FHA GUIDELINES.

UNIT WITH MOBILITY FEATURES: TO BE DETERMINED
UNITS WITH COMMUNICATION FEATURES: TO BE DETERMINED.

GSF TABLE
SEE G2.00A FOR BREAKDOWN AND FLOOR PLANS

FEMA MAP

PROJECT SITE
(IN ZONE X)
F/R

ROOM NAME / NUMBER

WALL / PARTITION

ASSEMBLY TYPE

FLOOR / ROOF ASSEMBLY

WINDOW TAG

DOOR NUMBER

SPOT ELEVATION

REVISION CLOUD

DETAIL CALLOUT

NORTH ARROW

GRIDLINE

BUILDING SECTION / SECTION

WALL SECTION

ELEVATION

FLOOR ELEVATION

PROPERTY LINE

SMOKE DETECTOR

EXIT SIGN

FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET
01 A1.01 1 A1.01

FIRST FLOOR
ELEV 100'-0" 1 A1.01 1 A1.01 1
1A
1A
1A W/P

ROOM NAME
101
101B
X'-X"
FEC 1A STOREFRONT TAG

SYMBOLS
101B DOOR TYPE

XX-XX MATERIAL TAG
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
6/27/2022 2:02:47 PM
G0.02
05/25/2022
1927400

PROJECT INFO

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DEDICATED 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 PARKLAND None DENSITY: 75.2 DU/ acre
Class 2: 8 spaces
Class 1: 108 spaces

BIKE PARKING
*See parking plan
Total Parking Provided: 82 Spaces
PARKING 0.76 spaces/unit (at 108 units)
Parking Setback: 6'
North Edge: 10' West Edge: varies (67'7" to 72')
Civic Center Dr. 10' sidewalk zone + 5' setback

SETBACKS &

FRONTAGES
Lincoln St: 10' sidewalk zone + varied setback (15' to 50') LOT COVERAGE 31,635sf / 61,409 sf =52%
HEIGHT: 5-stories 58'-9 1/2" along Civic Center Drive. 60'-6" along Lincoln Street 66'-7" along North facade 64'-5" along West façade

CATEGORY PROPOSED COMMENTS / STATUS
vv
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

GSF - TOTAL
Name Construction Type Area AREA 'A' TYPE I-A 18408 SF AREA 'B' TYPE I-A 13227 SF AREA 'C' TYPE III-A 47494 SF AREA 'D' TYPE III-A 53608 SF 132737 SF

MITH UN
EB (:} C)
----0 (:}
◊
------B =
= ~
0 6~
,-7
$ e>--_J
®
~
= □
0 t!1 1 .1!,Alfl~~ ,lttlhlf,fu
C
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:57:40 PM
G0.03
05/25/2022
1927400

GREEN POINT RATED

CHECKLIST

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
~ .... , __ r--;- .. , ,......._.-- .
!>- -•------- :!--'-_,._.., .... _._

MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
1,I l I I j j I I
C
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:57:41 PM
G0.04
05/25/2022
1927400

GREEN BUILDING

ARCHITECTURE

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
2G1a CAL!f!OIU&A GRll.N 8\JIU'.lllilG STAN DARO COOi!! (CGC) RESlb£.Nf\AL CHll!:CllU&T
lll&.c.«IIJIEIIMINO
"""""
____ ..... _...,. ____ ,,. __ _ •---.--.-.-OlC•IOII
=:=o;;:;::..--:-...::=-=~r·------ _.._ _..,...,.,.. ___ _,, .. __ _., • ::::-:=..-=:·:.-=--==-=-~~~::::=.= _....slf_......., • ........ .,...__ ... c... ...... 0-0--1.a ii---~------"'~1,._.ua;11• ------------..-- ~.~ .. _ ... _______ -.---...._.--.. ,.._,.,_..,__ ■ _T ___ -- ---Ill ____ _ ---.... -•j~ .. -IOIC•Jllal-" _ ,,. __ ,. _____ ...,. ___ .. ----- :..::.=::,.-::~:a-:-- ri,,,---••--1.J. ... ---------·-""'~ ____
• ._ __ _ _IIA..,.,--•ft--OX•:M••••
._,.,_
=::;:':':;:--- ,.,. ___ ---,.. ___ .. ---··-•·..---•"I u.,_...., .. ,µx;UOl1~ . - - .. ---·-··----· .. ,,..,_. _, ... 1 --..-.---.... -•,-rnl,,., .. ~.-.~-c.:•~ -....---.--.. -- ---------...-----.. ("~'111-- ...._ __ ..,,.._..,.._. _ ......... i:......-•-~t- • O.--lfl.Cl.-•-....... -c.11::,Jl)o, H •
----·--.,_ -- --.. •-«i..
·•-·--- aaJ..••-•-r.-•- . __._ ________ l,Ctic;•G11
---=--- ~----------..- ..::.==--=--=-'--===~-.::...-.: ---·---"""~"'-.. _., ____ .. ---_ ------a.c•t,:io• _____ ""_.,., _______ . ___ , ----..-...---1/U:--alC•-J-J
l~----.,.~-.--~----1!1"" ■ =-~~.:~--------. ---.-- . I~~•--•-..--. __ ..,.....,. ___ ,. ::::;-..:=---=~.t=~~---,, .. --...... - •
=---:~:=~ ....... -=--=-.,.=---=--== • c-__ ,,_, ________ , .-.-- ------
=:.-:!::-.:::.:-.:~::."::=:~·------ ___________ • ..... -"·--~-----... .,_ _____ _ ____ ....,. _________ IEVC • ~ -•-.tv<;--•-.. --~ .... --il-- ._,. ___ ,., . ,___..,_,.. ___ a:1'!1'<11111 ......---. __ .,__ .... -~~ .. c.,-.. .-.... _ .. _ ... _..,_...,cx.:,w.z lln-----DMIDMr•~~ C-,~o,DMIN.ilonl- 1.__..,._.....,. _____ .._ ·-------.. --h,- c.,.,. ---» .. ~o-.__ -- _
•-----•-•-• .. _~-....... -....
-
__ ..
--

MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
KEY

EXISTING

BUILDING

PARKING
CIVIC CENTER DR.

LINCOLN ST. 1 2 3 4
5 6
7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
SITE
SITE
EL
CAMINO
REAL
LINCOLN ST. CIVIC CENTER DR. EL
CAMINO
REAL
CIVIC
CENTER
DR. LINCOLN ST. 9
9 WOOD RAILING AND WINDOW TRIMSTUCCO EXTERIOR
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:57:43 PM
G1.01
05/25/2022
1927400

SITE & SURROUNDING

AREA PHOTOS

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2

MITH UN
:G - CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
THE DESIGN FOR CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING CREATES A GATEWAY CONDITION MOVING FROM EL CAMINO REAL TO THE CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS. THE SOUTHERN LEG OF THE BUILDING EXTENDS TOWARDS THE CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS, MAKING IT CLEARLY VISIBLE AS YOU MAKE YOUR WAY FROM EL CAMINO REAL DOWN LINCOLN. IT SERVES AS A WELCOMING POINT OF ORIENTATION, WITH A COMMUNITY ROOM OCCUPYING THE CORNER OF THE GROUND FLOOR. MOVING DOWN LINCOLN, THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING PULLS BACK FROM THE STREET, CREATING A LANDSCAPED FORECOURT THAT MIMICS THE CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS OPEN SPACE ACROSS THE STREET.

THE BUILDING IS BROKEN INTO 2 DISTINCT VOLUMES, REDUCING THE APPARENT SCALE OF THE BUILDING. THE VOLUMES ARE CONNECTED BY A BRIDGE THAT PROVIDES A VISUAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THE PRIVATE COURTYARD AND THE PUBLIC REALM.

NARRATIVE

RENEWAL AND RESILIENCE
LAYERS OF BARK OF THE BIG BERRY/ BLUE MANZANITA PEEL ANNUALLY AS AN ADAPTATION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST INSECTS AND PARASITIC ORGANISMS. TANNINS AND OTHER COMPOUNDS PRODUCED IN THE CELLS OF THE OUTER BARK SERVE TO DETER THESE ORGANISMS AND ARE ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VARIED COLORS AND LAYERED QUALITY OF THE TRUNK AND BRANCHES. THE PHYSICAL EXPRESSION OF THIS SPECIES IS ONE OF CONSTANT RENEWAL AND RESILIENCE, AND APT METAPHOR FOR A NEW COMMUNITY.

THE FORMAL LANGUAGE AND MATERIAL EXPRESSION OF THIS BUILDING TAKES ITS INSPIRATION FROM THE BLUE MANZANITA, A SPECIES ENDEMIC TO THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY.

THE SIMPLE STUCCO EXTERIOR IS PUNCTUATED BY BALCONIES, WHICH MIMIC THE PEELING BARK AND REVEAL OF A RICH ACCENT COLOR BENEATH, AS THE LIVING SPACES OF THE INTERIOR TRANSITION TO THE OUTSIDE.

THE BASE OF THE BUILDING IS WRAPPED IN A WARM GRAY STUCCO WITH NATURAL WOOD ACCENT PANELS EMPHASIZING THE PUBLIC PROGRAM ELEMENTS AND MAIN ENTRY, DRAWING PEOPLE AND THE OUTSIDE IN.

SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:57:45 PM
G1.02
05/25/2022
1927400

RENDERINGS, COLORS & MATERIALS

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
LINCOLN ST. (EAST) PERSPECTIVE

COLORS AND MATERIALS
STUCCO 1A- WHITE
STUCCO 1B- BLUE
STUCCO 1C- LIGHT GRAY
FIBER CEMENT PLANK - DARK GREY THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD SIDING; ALT. FIBER CEMENT PLANK FASCIA / WINDOW FRAME / BRAKE METAL 4, 5, 6 - DARK BRONZE 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

PERFORATED METAL GUARDRAIL/WALL PANEL - COPPER COLOR
STUCCO 1D- DARK GRAY

STREET TREES ARE REMOVED FROM RENDERING FOR CLARITY

MITH UN
:G - CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
THE DESIGN INCLUDES GROUND LEVEL UNITS ALONG CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WITH A LANDSCAPED SETBACK AND PRIVATE PATIOS TO HELP CREATE AN ACTIVE, RESIDENTIAL FEEL ON THIS STREET THAT TRANSITIONS INTO A SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD.

THE BUILDING IS SET BACK FROM THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY BY 65’, AND TREES ARE USED TO PROVIDE A NATURAL SCREENING BETWEEN THE NEW BUILDING AND EXISTING HOMES. WINDOWS ON THE WEST FACING ELEVATION ARE LIMITED IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE PRIVACY OF THE EXISTING HOMES.

NARRATIVE
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
6/27/2022 2:04:06 PM
G1.03
05/25/2022
1927400

RENDERINGS

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2

CIVIC CENTER PERSPECTIVE

LOBBY ENTRY PERSPECTIVE CIVIC CENTER STREET LEVEL PERSPECTIVE 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

STREET TREES ARE REMOVED FROM RENDERING FOR CLARITY

STREET TREES ARE REMOVED FROM RENDERING FOR CLARITY
~---------------------------------, MITH UN
C
UP
UP
EV
EV
VAN
NO

PARKING
EV
DN

PROJECT NORTH
LEGEND

PROPERTY LINE

PROPOSED SETBACK

HOSE LENGTH

FIRE ENGINE

EVA LANE

PARALLEL PARKING ZONE
(N) FIRE HYDRANT
(E) FIRE HYDRANT TO BE REMOVED

FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL SEE A2.01 FOR LOCATION
FDC
FACP
NOTES

1. SEE A3.11 & A3.12 FOR FULL BUILDING SECTIONS

2. SEE A2.01 FOR GROUND LEVEL CONDITIONS

INCLUDING FACP LOCATION

3. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADWAYS SHALL BE RECORDED AS PERMANENT EVAE

4. PER FD COMMENTS, AMMR WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR EVAE AT WESTERN DRIVEWAY. 5. EVAE TO HAVE ALL WEATHER SURFACE DESIGNED TO SUPPORT GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT OF 75,000 LBS.

CONSTRUCTION TYPE

TYPE IIIA & I-A
292'-11"
220'-4"
208'-11"
18 '-0" 158'-6"
LEVEL-2 PODIUM COURTYARD

SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS

AERIAL ACCESS ROAD

FIRE ACCESS
ROAD
217'-2"

HOSE REACH
64'-0"

HOSE REACH
30'-7"

HOSE REACH
125'-4"
CIVIC CENTER DR.

LINCOLN
ST.

PRIMARY ENTRY
SEE A2.01

STANDPIPE W/ OUTLET AND HOSE VALVE
BIOCELL TYP. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
(E) HYDRANT (+/- 120')
(E) HYDRANT (+/- 100')
10'-0" 5'-0"

SETBACK (N) STREET EASEMENT
(E) R.O.W.
36' - 0
4 "
6' - 0"
FIRE TRUCK TURN AT CORNER OF LINCOLN ST. & CIVIC CENTER DR.

SETBACK
10'-0"

HOSE REACH
28'-3"

HOSE REACH
42'-0" HOSE REACH117'-0"

HOSE REACH
54'-6"

NEW HYDRANT

NEW HYDRANT
FDC@ LEVEL 1

NEW HYDRANT
G1.04
3 26'-0"
G1.04
2 41'-0"
59'-2"
76'-0"
23'-2"
21'-9"
57'-10" AERIAL ACCESS ROAD

HOSE REACH
65'-6"

HOSE REACH
28'-3" (E) RO.W. SETBACK
HO
2SE REACH
1'-6"
HO
6SE REACH
3'-2"

HOSE REACH
44'-6" HOSE REACH
61'-3"
HO
9SE REACH
1'-7"
STAIR 2
STAIR 1
19'-0"
17'-10"

DRIVEWAY TO GARAGE PARKING

HOSE REACH
25'-6"

HOSE REACH
40'-0" HOSE REACH20'-0"

HOSE REACH
15'-2"
5'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0"
G1.04
4 100' MAX FROM PUBLIC HYDRANT
73'-2 1/2"
5' WIDE ALL-WEATHER PATHWAY
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"

PROPERTY LINE - SOUTH
EDGE OF CIVIC CENTER DR. 9'-0" 10'-4"
105' LADDER LENGTH

STREET PARKINGFIRE TRUCK

LAD ER REACH
64'-2"
27'-10 1/2" 50.2°

70.0° MAX
5'-0" 10'-0"

SIDEWALK
10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 14'-6"
54'-6"

SETBACK
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"

PROPERTY LINE - SOUTH
EDGE OF CIVIC CENTER DR. 9'-0" 10'-4"
105' LADDER LENGTH

LAD ER REACH
60'-4"

STREET PARKINGFIRE TRUCK
5'-0" 10'-0"

SIDEWALK

54.3°

70.0° MAX
10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 14'-6"
54'-6"

SETBACK
29'-7 1/4"
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"

PROPERTY LINE - WEST

EDGE OF AERIAL ACCESS ROAD
17'-0" 26'-0"
105' LADDER LENGTH

LADDER REACH
53'-6"

SURFACE PARKINGFIRE TRUCK
24'-0"

EDGE OF AERIAL ACCESS ROAD SURFACE PARKING

64.5°
17'-10 1/4"
14'-6" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0"
54'-6"
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:57:56 PM
G1.04
05/25/2022
1927400

FIRE ACCESS DIAGRAM

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
10 1" = 100'-0" FIRE HYDRANT DIAGRAM
1 1/16" = 1'-0" FIRE ACCESS-LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN
Fire Flow Requirements with Mixed Construction
Building Total Area (SF) Level 1 (Type IA) 31,635 SF Level 2-5 (Type IIIA) 101,066 SF Number of Stories 5 Height Varies from 58'-9" to 66'-6" Construction Type 4 levels Type IIIA over 1 level Type IA Occupancy Group R-2, S-2, A, B Calculations: Total Building area: 31,635 square feet (Type IA - Garage ) + 101,066 square feet (Type IIIA - Residential) = 132,701 SF Percentage of Building: IA = 31,635/132,701 x 100 = 23.8; IIIA = 101,066/132,701 x 100 = 76.2
Fire Flow Duration, Hydrant Locations and Distribution are to be based on the full Fire Flow required per CFC Table B105.1(2) Full Fire Flow: 0.238 (2,000 gpm) + 0.762 (4,500 gpm) = 3,905 gpm = 4,000 gpm (round up) A 75% reduction in fire-flow is allowed with the installation of an automatic fire sprinkler system designed in accordance with California Fire Code § B105.2. A max 50% reduction in fire flow is allowed per Conditions of Approval from Santa Clara Fire Department for this project. Reduced Fire Flow = 0.50 x 4,000 gpm = 2,000 gpm Based upon 4,000 gpm Full Fire Flow, there needs to be a minimum of 4 hydrants with an average spacing of 350 feet (from Appendix C of the Fire Code) for the duration of 4 hours. The frontage distance based on the 4,000 gpm Full flow requirement is 210 feet. 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
2 1/16" = 1'-0" LADDER REACH AT CIVIC BALCONY 02
3 1/16" = 1'-0" LADDER REACH AT CIVIC MAIN FACADE
4 1/16" = 1'-0" LADDER REACH AT WESTERN DRIVEWAY
L=t
L-f
1 I i - rr----~-------~-------:c=:: ~--- == -- --------------- - \ l"'""T""""""'::,.=;: \
-~
'
\
I
ii= 11~1
1' 1•1-... ' ----C_J.- ,} -----------2 \_,,\/ \\ \ ' I
I : // ~ '
I i / ,
: / r---~ s::::::::r--L---= I \ .I-
' \ I
••
Q
E9

MITH UN
:G - CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
UP
EV
EV
VAN
NO

PARKING
EV
UP
DN
LINCOLN ST.

BLDG

NEW DRIVEWAY ENTRY
CIVIC CENTER DR.
9 UNIVERSAL STALLS
15 UNIVERSAL STALLS
14 UNIVERSAL STALLS 2 ADA VAN STALLS

NEW DRIVEWAY
3 EV READY STALLS
4 UNIVERSAL STALLS
71' - 9 3/4"
3 UNIVERSAL STALLS
8 UNIVERSAL STALLS
8 UNIVERSAL STALLS
6 UNIVERAL STALLS
1 ADA STALL
7 UNIVERSAL STALLS
1 EV READY STALL

PARKING LEGEND

UNIVERSAL
8'-6"
17'-0"

ACCESSIBLE
9'-0"

VAN ACCESSIBLE
9'-0"
18'-0"
VAN
18'-0"

ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV)
EV
9'-0"
18'-0"
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:58:03 PM
G1.05
05/25/2022
1927400

PARKING PLAN

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 1 1/16" = 1'-0" LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - PARKING ** Included as part of Van accessible stall
* Included as part of ADA stall
AT 0.76 SPACES/ UNIT
TOTAL PARKING 82
SUBTOTAL PARKING 50
EV PARKING* 5 9'-0" X 18'-0"
CALGreen 4.106.4.2 (10% of total parking) CBC 11B-228.3.2.1 Includes (1) Van & (1) ADA Stall ADA STALLS REQ'D 1 9'-0" (+5'-0" ACCESS AISLE) X 18'-0" CBC 11B-208.2.3.1 VAN ACCESSBILE REQ. 1 9'-0" (+8'-0" ACCESS AISLE) X 18'-0" CBC 11B-208.2.4 (1/6 of ADA stalls) UNIVERSAL STALLS PROVIDED 45 8'-6" X 17'-0"

CATEGORY PROPOSED SIZE COMMENTS PARKING COUNT - INTERIOR SUBTOTAL PARKING 32
EV PARKING* 3 9'-0" X 18'-0"
CALGreen 4.106.4.2 (10% of total parking) CBC 11B-228.3.2.1 Includes (1) Van Stall ADA STALLS 0** 9'-0" (+5'-0" ACCESS AISLE) X 18'-0" 11B-208.2.3.1; VAN ACCESSBILE2 9'-0" (+8'-0" ACCESS AISLE) X 18'-0" 11B-208.2.4 (1/6 of ADA stalls) UNIVERSAL STALLS PROVIDED 29 8'-6" X 17'-0" CATEGORY PROPOSED SIZE COMMENTS PARKING COUNT - EXTERIOR 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
l
,----------------------- ™™\ 1-1 1-]-I I -I -17~~ \ r \ \
\ \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I , ~~~~ ~ \
L__________________________ _ _____ ,,,,I
I
\ 'c_
I
I
- MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
f.: ----\_\
l
j \ ----- ------\
C
EV
EV
VAN
NO

PARKING
EV
FDC
FDC
2BR-A SBR-D 2BR-A 3BR-D
ELEC
RM
FIRE
PUMP
DWH
EERC
TRASH
M SHOP

BIKE RM

LAUNDRY

COMMUNITY RM
LOBBY
OFFICE

TENANT SERVICES

PANTRY MTG
RM
MPOE
/TEL

HEAT STORAGE RM
RR
JAN. ELEV. CTRL. ?
2BR-B
SBR-A
3BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
3BR-B_2
3BR-B_3
? 3BR-B 2BR-B
1BR-B
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
3BR-A 2BR-B
2BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
3BR-C
SBR-A
1BR-A 3BR-B
SBR-A
1BR-C
1BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
SBR-A
3BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B 3BR-B_2
3BR-B_3
SBR-A
3BR-B
SBR-A
1BR-B
1BR-B
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
2BR-C 3BR-A 2BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
3BR-C
1BR-A 3BR-B
1BR-C
2BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
SBR-A
3BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B 3BR-B_2
3BR-B_3
SBR-A
3BR-B
SBR-A
1BR-B
1BR-B
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
3BR-A 2BR-B
2BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
3BR-C
1BR-C 2BR-B
1BR-A 3BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
SBR-A
3BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B 3BR-B_2
3BR-B_3
SBR-A
3BR-B 2BR-B
1BR-B
1BR-B
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
2BR-B 2BR-B 3BR-A
SBR-A
2BR-B
3BR-C
1BR-C
SBR-A
1BR-A 3BR-B
SBR-A
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:58:20 PM
G1.07
05/25/2022
1927400

UNIT COUNTS

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1 1" = 40'-0" GROUND FLOOR - FLOOR PLAN - UNIT COUNT (4 UNITS) 2 1" = 40'-0" LEVEL-2 PODIUM - UNIT COUNT (26 UNITS)
3 1" = 40'-0" LEVEL-3 FLOOR PLAN - UNIT COUNT (26 UNITS) UNIT COUNT - 1BR
Level Name Count
1BR-A
LEVEL 02 1BR-A 4
LEVEL 03 1BR-A 4
LEVEL 04 1BR-A 4
LEVEL 05 1BR-A 4
1BR-B
LEVEL 02 1BR-B 2
LEVEL 03 1BR-B 2
LEVEL 04 1BR-B 2
LEVEL 05 1BR-B 2
1BR-C
LEVEL 02 1BR-C 1
LEVEL 03 1BR-C 1
LEVEL 04 1BR-C 1
LEVEL 05 1BR-C 1
28 UNIT COUNT - 2BR
Level Name Count
2BR-A
LEVEL 01 2BR-A 2
2BR-B
LEVEL 02 2BR-B 6
LEVEL 03 2BR-B 5
LEVEL 04 2BR-B 6
LEVEL 05 2BR-B 6
2BR-C
LEVEL 03 2BR-C 1
26 UNIT COUNT - 3BR
Level Name Count
3BR-A
LEVEL 02 3BR-A 1
LEVEL 03 3BR-A 1
LEVEL 04 3BR-A 1
LEVEL 05 3BR-A 1
3BR-B
LEVEL 02 3BR-B 3
LEVEL 03 3BR-B 3
LEVEL 04 3BR-B 3
LEVEL 05 3BR-B 3
3BR-B_2
LEVEL 02 3BR-B_2 1
LEVEL 03 3BR-B_2 1
LEVEL 04 3BR-B_2 1
LEVEL 05 3BR-B_2 1
3BR-B_3
LEVEL 02 3BR-B_3 1
LEVEL 03 3BR-B_3 1
LEVEL 04 3BR-B_3 1
LEVEL 05 3BR-B_3 1
3BR-C
LEVEL 02 3BR-C 1
LEVEL 03 3BR-C 1
LEVEL 04 3BR-C 1
LEVEL 05 3BR-C 1
3BR-D
LEVEL 01 3BR-D 1
29 UNIT COUNT - STUDIO
Level Name Count SBR-A
LEVEL 02 SBR-A 6
LEVEL 03 SBR-A 6
LEVEL 04 SBR-A 6
LEVEL 05 SBR-A 6 SBR-D
LEVEL 01 SBR-D 1
25 5 1" = 40'-0" LEVEL-5 FLOOR PLAN - UNIT COUNT (26 UNITS) 4 1" = 40'-0" LEVEL-4 FLOOR PLAN - UNIT COUNT (26 UNITS)

UNIT COUNT - TOTAL

UNIT TYPE COUNT

AVERAGE
SQ FT SBR-A 24 379 SF SBR-D 1 395 SF
1BR-A 16 595 SF
1BR-B 8 641 SF
1BR-C 4 605 SF
2BR-A 2 766 SF
2BR-B 23 789 SF
2BR-C 1 826 SF
3BR-A 4 1139 SF
3BR-B 12 1091 SF
3BR-B_2 4 1107 SF
3BR-B_3 4 1090 SF
3BR-C 4 1131 SF
3BR-D 1 997 SF Grand total: 108
NOTES:

1. ALL AREAS IN THE SCHEDULE ARE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT LEVEL AND APPROXIMATE IN NATURE. 2. NSF FOR RESIDENTIAL UNIT INCLUDES SHAFT SPACE WITHIN THE UNIT. 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
~---------------- - - - - MITHUN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
18408 SF

AREA 'A' TYPE I-A
11860 SF

AREA 'B' TYPE I-A
669 SF

AREA 'B' TYPE I-A
370 SF

AREA 'B' TYPE I-A
328 SF

AREA 'B' TYPE I-A
11867 SF

AREA 'C' TYPE III-A
13302 SF

AREA 'D' TYPE III-A
11882 SF

AREA 'C' TYPE III-A
13466 SF

AREA 'D' TYPE III-A
11864 SF

AREA 'C' TYPE III-A
13466 SF

AREA 'D' TYPE III-A
11882 SF

AREA 'C' TYPE III-A
13374 SF

AREA 'D' TYPE III-A

1. GSF IS MEASURED TO OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS, CENTERLINE OF CORRIDOR WALLS, AND CENTERLINE OF PARTITION WALLS. 2. ALL AREAS IN THE SCHEDULE ARE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT LEVEL AND APPROXIMATE IN NATURE. 3. GSF DOES NOT INCLUDE COVERED EXTERIOR AREAS.

NOTES:

SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:58:30 PM
G2.00A
05/25/2022
1927400

GROSS AREA CALCS

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 1 1" = 40'-0" LEVEL 01 - GSF AREAS 2 1" = 40'-0" LEVEL 02 - GSF AREAS 3 1" = 40'-0" LEVEL 03 - GSF AREAS 4 1" = 40'-0" LEVEL 04 - GSF AREAS 5 1" = 40'-0" LEVEL 05 - GSF AREAS

GSF - TYPE I-A
Name Construction Type Area
LEVEL 01 AREA 'A' TYPE I-A 18408 SF AREA 'B' TYPE I-A 11860 SF AREA 'B' TYPE I-A 669 SF AREA 'B' TYPE I-A 370 SF AREA 'B' TYPE I-A 328 SF 31635 SF

GSF - TYPE III-A
Name Construction Type Area
LEVEL 02 AREA 'C' TYPE III-A 11867 SF AREA 'D' TYPE III-A 13302 SF LEVEL 03 AREA 'C' TYPE III-A 11882 SF AREA 'D' TYPE III-A 13466 SF LEVEL 04 AREA 'C' TYPE III-A 11864 SF AREA 'D' TYPE III-A 13466 SF LEVEL 05 AREA 'C' TYPE III-A 11882 SF AREA 'D' TYPE III-A 13374 SF 101102 SF

GSF - TOTAL
Name Construction Type Area AREA 'A' TYPE I-A 18408 SF AREA 'B' TYPE I-A 13227 SF AREA 'C' TYPE III-A 47494 SF AREA 'D' TYPE III-A 53608 SF 132737 SF

GSF - PER PROGRAM

LEVEL PROGRAM GSF
LEVEL 01
LEVEL 01 BOH 2371 SF
LEVEL 01 CIRCULATION - HORIZONTAL1174 SF
LEVEL 01 CIRCULATION - VERTICAL725 SF
LEVEL 01 COMMONS 5802 SF
LEVEL 01 PARKING 18338 SF
LEVEL 01 RESIDENTIAL 3229 SF
LEVEL 02
LEVEL 02 BOH 573 SF
LEVEL 02 CIRCULATION - HORIZONTAL2907 SF
LEVEL 02 CIRCULATION - VERTICAL606 SF
LEVEL 02 RESIDENTIAL 21083 SF
LEVEL 03
LEVEL 03 BOH 572 SF
LEVEL 03 CIRCULATION - HORIZONTAL3079 SF
LEVEL 03 CIRCULATION - VERTICAL606 SF
LEVEL 03 RESIDENTIAL 21073 SF
LEVEL 04
LEVEL 04 BOH 574 SF
LEVEL 04 CIRCULATION - HORIZONTAL3079 SF
LEVEL 04 CIRCULATION - VERTICAL606 SF
LEVEL 04 RESIDENTIAL 21071 SF
LEVEL 05
LEVEL 05 BOH 574 SF
LEVEL 05 CIRCULATION - HORIZONTAL3075 SF
LEVEL 05 CIRCULATION - VERTICAL603 SF
LEVEL 05 RESIDENTIAL 21004 SF

GSF -SUMMARY
PROGRAM GSF BOH 4664 SF CIRCULATION - HORIZONTAL
13314 SF
CIRCULATION - VERTICAL 3146 SF COMMONS 5802 SF PARKING 18338 SF RESIDENTIAL 87460 SF 132723 SF
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 - MITH UN
I I I I l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
I I I
~H
C
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET EX PROPERTY LINE EX PROPERTY LINE EX PROPERTY LINE EX PROPERTY LINE EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 8" SS EX 12" SD EX 12" SD EX 12" SD EX 8" W EX 10" W N89°45'55"E 281.59' S00°14'05"E 220.00' N89°45'55"E 237.69' R=843.74' L=54.60' Δ=3°42'29" N22°37'09"W 137.83' R=30.00' L=58.84' Δ=1 2°23'04" EX AC PARKING LOT TO BE REMOVED EX WOOD FENCE ON TOP OF 2' TO 3' RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN EX 2 STORY BUILDING TO BE REMOVED EX AC PARKING LOT TO BE REMOVED EX TRANSFORMER TO REMAIN EX FIRE HYDRANT TO BE RELOCATED EX STREET LIGHT TO BE RELOCATED EX STREET LIGHT TO BE RELOCATED EX STREET LIGHT TO BE RELOCATED EX STREET LIGHT TO BE RELOCATED EX DRIVEWAY CUT TO BE REMOVED 35.2'± 8.3'±

24.9'± 5.9'± 35' EX CURB RAMP TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED 45' EX STORM DRAIN CURB INLET TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED EX 12" SD PIPE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED EXISTING CONDITIONS C1.01 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20100 40 LEGEND WATER MAIN WATER METER WATER VALVE ELECTROLIER PROJECT BOUNDARY CURB AND GUTTER SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CENTERLINE PROPERTY LINE SIDEWALK STORM DRAIN LINE DRIVEWAY FIRE HYDRANT TREE EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE PULL BOX WHEELCHAIR RAMP SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT STORM DRAIN CURB INLET JOINT TRENCH GAS STORM DRAIN INLET NOTES 1. ALL EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE PROPERTY TO BE REMOVED. 2. EXISTING CURB, GUTTER AND ATTACHED SIDEWALK TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED ALONG THE PROJECT FRONTAGE ON CIVIC CENTER DRIVE. 3. EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER ALONG THE PROJECT FRONTAGE ON LINCOLN STREET TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED. 4. EXISTING ATTACHED SIDEWALK ALONG THE PROJECT FRONTAGE ON LINCOLN STREET TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A DETACHED SIDEWALK. CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET 1570 Oakland Road (408) 487-2200 San Jose, CA 95131 HMHca.com SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com ® DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER © 2016 MITHUN, INC. PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR NO. DATE REVISION CHECK DATE ISSUE VICINITY MAP COUNTY STAMP SPACE: 05/25/2022 1927400 CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 APKB / SA SA / AK 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL 11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 ( W(E) - W(E)---"t't->--._ ti,.~ ~£)-w(E~'/,\0---- SO(E) - SO(E) - SO(E) - SD(E) ----SD(E) - SD(E) - SD{E) - SO(E) - SS(E) - SS(E) - SS(E)-SS(E) -----SS(E) - SS(E) - SS(E) - SS(E)----0--SS(E) - SS(E) - SS(E)-SS(E)- SS(E) - SS(E) - SS{E) ----SS(EJ-SS(E)- SS{E~S u--- - SS(E) - Q - SO(E) - @ D - W(E)- I)-<, -JT(E)- ' -G([)- MITH UN -1- IMI-I- C

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
EV
EV
VAN
NO

PARKING
EV CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET EX PROPERTY LINE EX PROPERTY LINE EX PROPERTY LINE EX PROPERTY LINE 35' 25' 10' 26'
10' 10' 4.5' 10'
(3) 8.5'x17' PARKING SPACES(3) 8.5'x17' PARKING SPACES(3) 8.5'x17' PARKING SPACES(3) 8.5'x17' PARKING SPACES WATER EASEMENT 5.5' SIDEWALK ESMT 5' SETBACK ESMT 5' SETBACK ESMT
25' 10'

12.71' 18' 9' 8' 9'
(2) 8.5'x17' PARKING
SPACES
(3) 8.5'x17' PARKING
SPACES
(3) 8.5'x17' PARKING SPACES 26' WATER EASEMENT

11.64'

14.31' 15' SETBACK ESMT
(2) 8.5'x18' PARKING
SPACES (1) 9'x18' EV ~ ADA PARKING SPACE (1) 9'x18' EV ~ ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE (1) 9'x18' EV PARKING SPACE (3) 8.5'x17' PARKING
SPACES
(3) 8.5'x17' PARKING
SPACES (1) 9'x17' PARKING SPACE 19.22' 3.5' UGEE ESMT
4' UGEE ESMT
10' 10' 10' 10' FACE OF CURB BACK OF SIDEWALK / / / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | X 10' 10' 10' 10' SITE PLAN C1.02 LEGEND PROJECT BOUNDARY CURB AND GUTTER EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE SIDEWALK DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE PROPOSED EXISTING WHEELCHAIR RAMP 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20100 40 SCALE: 1" = 20' DRIVEWAY'S TRIANGLE OF SAFETY CIVIC CENTER DRIVE CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET 1570 Oakland Road (408) 487-2200 San Jose, CA 95131 HMHca.com SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com ® DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER © 2016 MITHUN, INC. PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR NO. DATE REVISION CHECK DATE ISSUE VICINITY MAP COUNTY STAMP SPACE: 05/25/2022 1927400 CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 APKB / SA SA / AK 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL 11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 SCALE: 1" = 20' DRIVEWAY'S TRIANGLE OF SAFETY LINCOLN STREET MITH UN -1- IMI-I- w-- ' \ \ C

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
EV
EV
VAN
NO

PARKING
EV | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD TC 72.49 EX TC 75.08± TC 71.05 EX TC 70.40± FF 72.80 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET EX 12" SD EX 12" SD EX 12" SD EX PROPERTY LINE EX PROPERTY LINE EX PROPERTY LINE EX PROPERTY LINE BOW / FL 75.04 BOW 74.80

4.0% 0.9% FS 72.60

0.5% A C2.02 B C2.02 C C2.02 FF 74.96 D C2.02 TC 70.47 EX TW 76.0± EX BW 73.7± EX TW 76.0± EX BW 73.5± EX TW 78.0± EX BW 75.9± EX TW 77.9± EX BW 75.4± EX TW 77.9± EX BW 75.2± EX TW 77.9± EX BW 75.3± EX TW 77.9± EX BW 74.7± EX TW 75.9± EX BW 73.9± EX TW 77.9± EX BW 73.9± EG 72.8± 5.5' SIDEWALK ESMT FF 73.50 FF 71.15 GS 73.50 FF 74.50 FS 74.76 FF 73.50 FS 73.77 GBFS 73.64 GB

0.5% 2.0% FS 73.12 GB TVC 74.40 FS 73.90 TVC 74.40 FS 73.90 (E) 0.3% (E)0.9% FF 73.50 BOW 70.68 TVC 73.47 TVC 73.62 TVC 73.77 2.0% 2.0% TVC 73.92 TVC 74.20 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% TVC 74.60 TVC 74.47 TVC 74.74 FS 74.24 TVC 74.74 FS 74.24 TVC 74.74 FS 74.24 FF 74.87 FF 74.87 FF 72.70 2.0% FF 74.40 TVC 74.36 FS 73.86 2.6% 1.8% 1.5% 2.5% 2.3% FS 73.56~GB FS 73.62~GB FS 73.56~GB 2.0% TVC 74.15 FS 73.65 TVC 73.79 FS 73.29 1.5% TVC 74.13 FS 73.63 TC 70.74 FF 71.80 BOW 71.00 2% MAX
2% MAX FS 72.83 FS 72.66 FS 71.66 BOW 70.86

3.9% 2.3% 4.4% GS 71.80 GS 71.15 FF 73.50 BOW 70.73 FS 70.98 TC 70.57 FS 71.68 FS 71.68 TC 70.60 3.9% FS 72.56 (2) 6.5" STEPS

1.8% BOW 70.83 2% 0.9% FS 70.96 FS 71.01 FS 71.47 FS 71.52 FS 71.59 FS 71.64 EG 71.9± EG 71.5± 1.8% 1.0% 1.2% 1.5%

1.8% 1.8% 1.8% GRADING PLAN C2.01 LEGEND PROJECT BOUNDARY CURB AND GUTTER EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE SIDEWALK DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE PROPOSED EXISTING WHEELCHAIR RAMP 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20100 40 STORM DRAIN LINE STORM DRAIN MANHOLE DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE STORM DRAIN CURB INLET SD STORM DRAIN INLET (1X1) STORM DRAIN INLET (2X2) OVERLAND RELEASE PATH STORM DRAIN BUBBLER CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET 1570 Oakland Road (408) 487-2200 San Jose, CA 95131 HMHca.com SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com ® DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER © 2016 MITHUN, INC. PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR NO. DATE REVISION CHECK DATE ISSUE VICINITY MAP COUNTY STAMP SPACE: 05/25/2022 1927400 CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 APKB / SA SA / AK 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL 11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 • . - SO{EJ - @ . MITH UN -1- IMI-I- C SECTION NTS A EX 2'-3' TALL RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN EX PL 7' PARKING DRIVE AISLE SECTION NTS B GS 71.80 EX PL GARAGE 2' BIORETENTION SECTION NTS C BIORETENTION LINCOLN STREET EX PL EX CL 45' 4.5' 35' SECTION NTS D CIVIC CENTER DRIVE EX PL EX CL 35' 25' SIDEWALK 5.71' 10' FF 74.50 APARTMENT EX TW 77.9± EX BW 74.8±TVC 73.88 EG 72.3± TVC 74.40 TC 70.67 BOW 70.93 10' DETACHED WALK 1' TC 73.65 BOW 73.83 12.71'± 7' 5.5' BIORETENTION 2% PARKING 17' 26' 17' GARAGE 3.15' 70.15' 14.33'± 1.5' VARIES 1.5%-2.6% 2% 5.5' 2' MAX RETAINING WALL 1.33'± 5' 6' 4.5' GRADING SECTIONS C2.02 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET 1570 Oakland Road (408) 487-2200 San Jose, CA 95131 HMHca.com SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com ® DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER © 2016 MITHUN, INC. PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR NO. DATE REVISION CHECK DATE ISSUE VICINITY MAP COUNTY STAMP SPACE: 05/25/2022 1927400 CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 APKB / SA SA / AK 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL 11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 - MITH UN -1- IM I-I- C

X X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X X

X X X X X X
EV
EV
VAN
NO

PARKING
EV
25 19
19 20 20

CONCRETE
APRON
25 19

SS SS SS SS SS

W W W W
W
W
IRR

SS SS SS
W
| | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SD

SD SD SD

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD EX 12" SD EX 12" SD
EX 12" SD EX PROPERTY LINE EX PROPERTY LINE EX PROPERTY LINE CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREETEX 8" SS EX 8" SS
EX 8" SS EX 8" W
EX 10" W DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTER FIRE WATER SERVICE WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTER IRRIGATION SERVICE WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTER 50 LF ~ 12" SD @ S = 0.0200 WATER EASEMENT EX PROPERTY LINE WATER EASEMENT 51 LF ~ 6" SS @ S = 0.0100139 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.0085 CONNECT TO EX SEWER INV 66.80 ~ 6" IN (N) EX INV 66.1± ~ EX 8" THRU (W-E) EX SDMH EX RIM 70.8± INV 65.45 ~ 12" IN (W) EX INV 65.3± ~ EX 12" THRU (SE-NW) EX SDMH EX RIM 74.6± EX INV 69.0± ~ EX 12" THRU (W-E) EX SDMH EX RIM 72.5± EX INV 67.1± ~ EX 12" IN (W) EX INV 66.9± ~ EX 12" IN (E) INV 66.70 ~ 12" IN (NW) EX INV 66.7± ~ EX 12" IN (SW) EX INV 66.5± ~ EX 12" OUT (N) EX SSMH EX RIM 72.5± EX INV 64.9± ~ EX 8" IN (SE&W) EX INV 64.7± ~ EX 8" OUT (NW) EX SSMH EX RIM 70.9± EX INV 63.7± ~ EX 8" THRU (SE-NW) EX SSMH EX RIM 74.4± EX INV 66.9± ~ EX 8" THRU (W-E) SDCI TC 71.2± INV 67.43 ~ 12" IN (W) INV 67.43 ~ 12" OUT (SE) SSCO RIM 71.1± INV 66.17 ~ 6" OUT (NE) SDMH RIM 71.3± INV 66.00 ~ 12" IN (SW) EX INV 65.7± ~ EX 12" THRU (SE-NW) SDFI TG 70.8± INV 67.00 ~ 6" IN (NW&SE) INV 67.00 ~ 12" OUT (NE) SDFI TG 71.0± INV 66.91 IN ~ 6" IN (S) INV 66.91 ~ 12" THRU (W-E) SDFI TG 72.4± INV 67.57 ~ 12" OUT 89 LF ~ 6" SS @ S = 0.020 SDFI TG 74.4± INV 69.81 ~ 6" THRU (N-E) SDFI TG 72.6± INV 68.52 ~ 6" OUT EXISTING WATER VALVE FOR EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO BE REMOVED EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO BE REMOVED SDFI TG 73.2± INV 69.33 ~ 6" OUT SSCO RIM 73.4± INV 67.36 ~ 6" OUT SDFI TG 74.2± INV 69.93 ~ 6" OUT SDFI TG 74.1± INV 69.85 ~ 6" OUT SDFI TG 70.8± INV 67.25 ~ 6" OUT @ S = 0.0100
25 LF ~ 6" SD 14 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.0100 SDFI TG 70.6± INV 67.14 ~ 6" OUT SSCO RIM 71.0± INV 66.74 ~ 4" OUT 16 LF ~ 4" SS @ S = 0.020 SDFI TG 70.8± INV 66.96 ~ 6" OUT 5 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.010 69 LF ~ 12" SD @ S = 0.005 SDFI TG 71.4± INV 67.38 ~ 6" OUT 5 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.010 73 LF ~ 12" SD @ S =0.020 SDFI TG 72.6± INV 69.10 ~ 6" OUT 63 LF ~ 12" SD @ S = 0.005 SDFI TG 71.7± INV 67.23 IN ~ 6" IN (S) INV 67.23 ~ 12" THRU (W-E) 31 LF TRENCH DRAIN 22 LF ~ 4" SD @ S = 0.020 BUBBLER BOX TG 70.7± INV 68.30 ~ 6" OUT SD INLET TG 70.9± INV 68.74 ~ 4" OUT 73 LF ~ 12" SD @ S = 0.0100 62 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.0085 SDFI TG 72.8± INV 68.38 ~ 6" IN (NW) INV 67.88 ~ 6" IN (SW) INV 67.88 ~ 12" OUT(E) 45 LF ~ 12" SD @ S = 0.0100 7 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.0200 SDCO RIM 72.8± INV 68.04 ~ 6" THRU (W-N) 19 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.0085 SDCO RIM 73.4± INV 68.57 ~ 6" THRU SDCO RIM 73.4± INV 68.63 ~ 6" THRU 7 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.0085 1 2

3.5' UGEE ESMT
4' UGEE ESMT SECTION 2 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE EX PL FF 74.50 APARTMENT BOW 74.01 TC 73.83 FS 74.36 SECTION SCALE: 1" = 5' 1 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE EX PLSIDEWALK WITH TREE WELLS 10' FF 74.96 APARTMENT TC 74.36 BOW 74.54 BIORETENTION AREA

5.17' 1' ROOT BARRIER FOR 4'x6' TREE WELLS ROOT BARRIER FOR 4'x6' TREE WELLS

5.17' FOOTING PER STRUCTURAL PLANS 1' 4' 10' SIDEWALK WITH TREE WELLS 13.14'± 7.64' 0.5' 4' 3' 4' 4.5' 2' 3.5' UGEE 0.5' 12.71'± 6.21' 3.5' UGEE INV 69.31 ~ 6" SD 1'x1' SD INLET BEYOND SCALE: 1" = 5' 5.5' 2' 3' 4' 4.5' 5.5' 1'x1' SD INLET INV 69.81 ~ 6" SD 1' UTILITY PLAN C3.01 LEGEND PROJECT BOUNDARY CURB AND GUTTER EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE SIDEWALK DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE PROPOSED EXISTING WHEELCHAIR RAMP 1 INCH = 20 FEET 0 10 20 40 STORM DRAIN LINE STORM DRAIN MANHOLE STORM DRAIN CURB INLET SD STORM DRAIN INLET (1X1) STORM DRAIN INLET (2X2) STORM DRAIN BUBBLER BOX WATER MAIN WATER VALVE ELECTROLIER SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT PULL BOX SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT JOINT TRENCH SSW FIRE WATER FIRE SERVICE WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTER DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTER GAS IRRIGATION SERVICE WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTER CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET 1570 Oakland Road (408) 487-2200 San Jose, CA 95131 HMHca.com SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com ® DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER © 2016 MITHUN, INC. PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR NO. DATE REVISION CHECK DATE ISSUE VICINITY MAP COUNTY STAMP SPACE: 05/25/2022 1927400 CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 APKB / SA SA / AK 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL 11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 STORM DRAIN CLEAN OUT STORM DRAIN TRENCH DRAIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + + +
t>--_llft)~W(Er---'f(El---
- SD(E)-SO(E)- Sll(E) - SO(E) - Sll(E) - SD(E) - SO(E)-SD(E)-----@---SD(E)- SO(E)--SD(E)-SD(E)- SD(E)---SD(Eq SO(E)-SO(E)- SO(E) - SO(E) - SD(E) - SS(EJ-~-SS(E) - SS(E)==--SS(E) --=SS(E)~E) --;;;--SS(E) ----0-SS(E) - SS(~-SS(E)=-SS(E)--=Ss{E)7E)-SS(E)- SS(E) - SS(E) - SS(E)~ SS I I H
'9s \
= &
•
.
•
I
uw--

MITH UN
= Lill -1-I
M I i- - SD( E) -
@
6 - Ss(E) -
0 - W(E}---
I:

Q--<>
D\ -JT(E)- -G([)-
C

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
EV
EV
VAN
NO

PARKING
EV | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET DMA 1 DMA 2 DMA 3 DMA 4 DMA 5 DMA 6 DMA 7 DMA 8 DMA 9 TCM 1 TCM 2 TCM 3 TCM 4 TCM 5 TCM 6 TCM 7 TCM 8 TCM 11 TCM 10 STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN C4.01 LEGEND PROJECT BOUNDARY CURB AND GUTTER EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE SIDEWALK DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE PROPOSED EXISTING WHEELCHAIR RAMP 1 INCH = 20 FEET 0 10 20 40 STORM DRAIN LINE STORM DRAIN MANHOLE DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE STORM DRAIN CURB INLET SD STORM DRAIN INLET (1X1) STORM DRAIN INLET (2X2) STORM DRAIN BUBBLER DMA DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA (DMA) BIORETENTION BASIN CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET 1570 Oakland Road (408) 487-2200 San Jose, CA 95131 HMHca.com SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com ® DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER © 2016 MITHUN, INC. PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR NO. DATE REVISION CHECK DATE ISSUE VICINITY MAP COUNTY STAMP SPACE: 05/25/2022 1927400 CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 APKB / SA SA / AK 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL 11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 LJ--1 - SD(E)-SD(E) - SD(EJ - SD(E) -SD(E) - SD(E)----@------SD(E) - :co.-..;,,,, =-=-,.;,,,, :-. =, .. -_ ..... ,.,...,... - SO{E) - @ • MITH UN -+ IMI -I- D TOSTORM DRAIN 2 TOSTORM DRAIN FLOW-THROUGH PLANTER (ABOVE GRADE) 1 FLOW-THROUGH PLANTER (BELOW GRADE) N.T.S. N.T.S. * IF TOP OF WALL TO BOTTOM OF FOOTING IS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 4' WALL SHALL BE STRUCTURALLY DESIGNED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DOWNSPOUT NOTE: IN THE EVENT ONLY ONE DOWNSPOUT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE FLOW-THROUGH PLANTER BOX, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A FLOW SPREADER AT THE DOWNSPOUT TO ENSURE PROPER DISTRIBUTION OF STORMWATER OVER THE ENTIRE PLANTER. DOWNSPOUT NOTE: IN THE EVENT ONLY ONE DOWNSPOUT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE FLOW-THROUGH PLANTER BOX, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A FLOW SPREADER AT THE DOWNSPOUT TO ENSURE PROPER DISTRIBUTION OF STORMWATER OVER THE ENTIRE PLANTER. 1" MIN. RISER HEIGHT SEE TCM TABLE
18"
(BSM) 12" MIN.

X*0.2' 18"
(BSM) 12" MIN. RISER HEIGHT SEE TCM TABLE

PAVEMENT

SLOPE TO
DRAIN
18" MIN.
6" HIGH
CURB
6" HIGH

CURB SECTION VIEW
6" A
A A-A SEE BIORETENTION OR FTP DETAILS 4 CURB OPENING N.T.S.

0.2' VARIES PER DESIGN
X** IF TOP OF WALL TO BOTTOM OF FOOTING IS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 4' WALL SHALL BE STRUCTURALLY DESIGNED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SEE BIORETENTION OR FTP DETAILS 5 N.T.S. CURB ADJACENT TO BIORETENTION WARPED GUTTER CL PLAN VIEW 3'-6" 12" A A
3:1 MAX 1'-6" MIN 6" VARIES SEE PLAN

0.2' MIN. 6"
6" X"
3 DEPRESS 2" MAX AT OPENING 24" 24" BIO-TREATMENT SOIL MIX (BSM) PER SPECS. ADJACENT SURFACE BUILDING WALL 4" MIN. DIA. APPROVED COBBLE 0.2' BELOW DOWNSPOUTS FOR DISTANCE OF 2' EITHER SIDE OF DOWNSPOUT CLEANOUT W/ CAP AT FINISH GRADE REINF. CONCRETE PLANTER 4" MIN. DIA. APPROVED COBBLE 0.2' BELOW DOWNSPOUTS FOR DISTANCE OF 2' EITHER SIDE OF DOWNSPOUT BUILDING WALL CLEANOUT W/ CAP AT FINISH GRADE PLACE 4" MIN. DIA. APPROVED COBBLE 0.2' BELOW CURB OPENINGS FOR DISTANCE OF 2' EITHER SIDE OF CURB OPENINGS BOTTOM OF BIORETENTION BASIN SET BOTTOM OF CURB PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT TO FOR PAVEMENT STABILITY AND TO AVOID WATER INFILTRATION UNDER PAVEMENT INSTALL 4" MIN DIA. APPROVED COBBLE 0.2 FEET BELOW CURB OPENINGS FOR DISTANCE OF 2' EITHER SIDE OF CURB OPENINGS. SEE PLAN VIEW FOR LOCATION CURB & GUTTER PLACE 4" MIN. DIA. APPROVED COBBLE 0.2' BELOW CURB OPENINGS FOR DISTANCE OF 2' EITHER SIDE OF CURB OPENINGS PERFORATED PIPE (SLOPE AT 0.50% MIN) W/ PERFORATIONS DOWN. SEE PLAN FOR LENGTH AND LOCATION. 12" MIN. OF CLASS II PERMEABLE ROCK PER CALTRANS SPECS. ROCK SECTION TO INCREASE WITH SLOPE OF PIPE. 12" MIN. OF CLASS II PERMEABLE ROCK PER CALTRANS SPECS. ROCK SECTION TO INCREASE WITH SLOPE OF PIPE. WALL W/ WATERPROOF MEMBRANE PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. WATERPROOF MEMBRANE PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. BIO-TREATMENT SOIL MIX (BSM) PER SPECS. CURB OPENING (SEE DETAIL AND PLAN FOR LOCATION) PERFORATED PIPE (SLOPE AT 0.50% MIN) W/ PERFORATIONS DOWN. SEE PLAN FOR LENGTH AND LOCATION. 3 12" MIN. OF CLASS II PERMEABLE ROCK PER CALTRANS SPECS. ROCK SECTION TO INCREASE WITH SLOPE OF PIPE. VARIES PERFORATED PIPE (SLOPE AT 0.50% MIN) W/ PERFORATIONS DOWN. SEE PLAN FOR LENGTH AND LOCATION. 3:1 MAX
18" CLEANOUT W/ CAP AT FINISH GRADE VARIES SEE PLAN VARIES SEE PLAN PLACE 4" MIN. DIA. APPROVED COBBLE 0.2' BELOW CURB OPENINGS FOR DISTANCE OF 2' EITHER SIDE OF CURB OPENINGS. PLACE GEOTEXTILE BETWEEN COBBLES & NATIVE SOIL FOR EROSION CONTROL. SOLID OVERFLOW PIPE BIORETENTION BASIN W/ LINER IMPERMEABLE LINER N.T.S. CHRISTY V12 OR APPROVED EQUAL OVERFLOW RISER W/ GRATE BIO-TREATMENT SOIL MIX (BSM) PER SPECS. RISER HEIGHT SEE TCM SUMMARY TABLE 0.2" 8" MIN. VARIES STORMWATER CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS C4.02 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET 1570 Oakland Road (408) 487-2200 San Jose, CA 95131 HMHca.com SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com ® DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER © 2016 MITHUN, INC. PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR NO. DATE REVISION CHECK DATE ISSUE VICINITY MAP COUNTY STAMP SPACE: 05/25/2022 1927400 CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 APKB / SA SA / AK 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL 11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 .... _..,._., __ ... ~-- ==::..."'":":=::-:;;-••1----... Ellelr11irotnlCMIU1kd101nc1 Ti,,a~m--,--. ... -an.-...---.a...ana ll!Ml9dlnlflll~IM6<ttM'·i,,11'14~- NNNN~ ,,._(,tlll',""r~l...--ftl~•ll~-li~O,~""' Nl)H Ill /91Mt.-nwil. Ill M tr...,.,.,_-•~ 0.0.~ 11,it OOIIWIQ-11\Mlllll,_~_.IMllilllQ,klllllllallylllllliC.afll'I - P1emlhM .. ~1fllrll!IIMl. dmffl.and'IMlmlJCVllOMkntlllNldbl -w ... 111.-..--u.1 ~-p&aN•--1n,-.ana f9tlillf9r, DN!lillw..wwt. ... 9"dirt91 .. ~,.,.._l"II ~,,...... OllfflPIIIWl1lltillualllanll--~IUffl-,w~ m;,rie~ ..-Jh~flll'!IMl!MI'~
__
'l"lt:'~t!"'Jpliytlo!l!ll'~Mt ..,,.llngorwnlnlllicilir{1frNlf)an_reciu .... M.dlore.Ml'IIIM M~
N4",111..,.__,.ie'~~.1,11,.;,r,n,,11...,,.111 ......... !+'IOl'INII-M\i!tlll\l4iil and~--CllqllNClordll .. NdV~!IPA 111911) Dl ... -.d ...--Dllf-KH,_..wigpr-11,_. __ llll•iO-H•N 1st.nlpo1NM IIMP.hfillh!lllltnlilllDar..t.nryatirKtrt.habllallllllrnot<IIMlll1 --"""'1•~ .. QfNQl'lly llfjl,NO ~wall!' NlMIM inl~ ,a, Mffl~ ll'eW\lllll!r!IM llll,lll'and _,-. lllMllffl llllr.HGNp,gflll Wilnlionralff .,..,_.,.., llljlf-,it~llflll ~trf/;l,f,hiY1';te,,hft,ilfl "'fdi:Ml6r\,~1111,1Pf .. lll~li:I trwHianll'IACWHIM .. ~lwCIIHcalllil -n:l'NNIM_U_
•~nl~ftffll~N~~~
:.:r1,W).::'.~ ~~~::.:-,.::::: =., a.r: ~Ol'wl\tf'IN._Ml)o',t.lGi"""".,,.,.,.li~ 8'it(.,11(411y,N.,..._. .. N, f«lllftll'llldl~~twoklll'INy... INhauQhll)oll!UtNl9m.ylll M .-1.--,,;i-GIMMpilllflll
ll!lt!Mlll'll!ll'l'Wllftlll'I
1111pnm..,--lunallln
VIQlll..,.,_ ..-,,-11...,_~, ~uw-cn1n,-,.,_m;IIHlilawlL'UCIIHII Thaftlaallll1111pa1YWl!y 1'1ti!h~1•~0tll«~fll"'Mltill,,.6'1wllbl.........,,~r,..,. 111M Dlplndlnglanpol.Unllolldl, IOllll!lllyllNdlClbl~~~lO}'N'IU 4(11',!i~(llO,lWQI
,,_l(Jll(/M(lj)~~~•~<"Nf~-~
-
----.,
_,..._

MITH UN
-+ IMI -ID
STORMWATER CONTROL CALCULATIONS C4.03 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET 1570 Oakland Road (408) 487-2200 San Jose, CA 95131 HMHca.com SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com ® DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER © 2016 MITHUN, INC. PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR NO. DATE REVISION CHECK DATE ISSUE VICINITY MAP COUNTY STAMP SPACE: 05/25/2022 1927400 CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 APKB / SA SA / AK 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL 11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 a;;i..-$1 --~-L.a..:l DiL-- ~~=:~·-~:: "-----·- ---. .. ~. MITH UN -+ IMI -I- -·· D ··············· ELECTRIC AND GAS SERVICE REQUIREMENTS SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com ® DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER © 2016 MITHUN, INC. ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42" Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators. All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project. Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above. PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR NO. DATE REVISION CHECK DATE ISSUE CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET VICINITY MAP COUNTY STAMP SPACE: JT-1 05/25/2022 21-086 JOINT TRENCH TITLE SHEET CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT APKB / SA SA / AK 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL 11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 5/18/2022 9:42:55 AM

PROJECT
SITE
,n~~s-,0t

VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
~ ll;SlALL
~ T>.LL ~ L
~ T>.LL ..

EtCAVAT'()N
fl ~ LY~ MEB PMS
EtCAVAT'Ot
.Q0000
e oooo
,0000• ,0000•
.. ,0000•
,0000•
... ,0000•
El fl!;Ji'ffmffft6 & IJWi5EPMR ,0000•
~ L
m~~f&SfrM!LIMFS
E~CAVAllON.
illrwl~f &S:tJTAL~Al)
,0000•
,0oe oo
,0000• ,0000•
.Q00 00
.Q0000
~ TALL .Q000 e
CAT&~fis~fS .Q000 e
EXCAVAllON. .Q000 e
c,rc flflRCoNPurr _I.CCEPlED _DEal\lo 'lU'PLY&IN'.SlALL .Q0000 CIE C flfJRSPIICEBOX£S _ACC[PlED _ DECU~D SU'PLY &11;SlALL ,.()0000 mAVAllON. , .. .()0000
PIR~~& ?!~\1/CON!A£~ Atfl 80BE .Q0000
.Q0000
• r~~~~1~:.:r~& 1Sr~TY T~o:=t BY
ONOT!J'P\.J01!ll[LfUSS0llU1WISESPEGfl [D
----------------------<
Tl£SE Pl.ANS WERE PREPARED IN CONJUtCIK»I 'MTH THE roL.LOWING Pl.ANS:
!!.QJfi I. rn'(ff~ ~~ DuWC,'/li-\tsc~i:fillil.ED IN Ni HlE.I n111 CAN BE PLlfflrn 2' ~~d)~~&~fM~l,IJrfc%~oRE£ ~~LAloc1mi WJ,R~~ M~J.

Q) S'.NOBACl(f'U © 5· SECO!O,RY COl<lUT
® ® , · uamELICIRICClRO.JIT
(]) 5"PRl=COIOUTS
® ®
@
!!.QJfi 1. [,~fi.Jo~l'W • .JilFfl1c:ffi\m:~;smR m>CAL [L[CTRC rno,CH SECTOOS /HJ 2 . .w&ll,l,IDEPTHI.I05EPl<lATONREl).,l,[1,CNT'SBCT'liEING,!,'S, D,TV, IHJT[lIPHQN[ CONDUITSTDBEPRCl/l UBi'TH[RESPECT'-'EIJTUT(S
3,DEPTHNiOBAD(FUREl).,l,0,CNlSf'OR.()l<llR[..-:a'S fjPUlJCRWTOfWI.YS>l'.LL COl,f'LY WITH CIT'( Cf' SH,/11, CLNl.l. ENGNEIRING DEPIIRlUENT Sl/o/'HWID SPECJlCAlJCll/S

4. JOlf/1 TRENCH COflSffilJCTON REQJl<[!CNl'l APP\.YwtCN Ail LITLITYSU!SffilJCTURES AREINSTI.I.LrnATTH'SIJ.ETI UE
------------------------------------------
4" SAfllP
~Wtr
PERIJTUTYCOll'I.NY PERl/Tl.lTYCOIS'IW'f
,JOINT TRENCH OVFR WATER & S S & S D
' 11'DTH Pffi Sil[ & r.lJ Ul£R Of OCH UTILITY. PG.t[ AND CITY INSPl'CTOR TO OCIERl,U£ r.lETHOO Of Cl!OSSJIIG GENERAi NOTES·
TH'PR[HRR[DTRENCHLOCI.TONISINI.PUElJCIJTUTY[ASBUIT(P,U,E.). 2 AilDEPTI-IS#IJRESU.TINGCCIIERREOUl<O.UIToAREIOSUREDFROUFlN/.1.. GR.'OC.

MIYCHANGESTOTHISDESK)N

MUST BE APPROVED BY
CONSTRUCTION NOTES·
ALLIRENCltNG , BACKFllLf..CAND lflS[lti,\l(]NBYCOOTRAClORUUSlOOl,PI.YiillHPG&[UOSl.wJARDS.545.J (EFf[CT'-'E DI.I[ 7-~-2000) AND SIL(ON VI.I.LEY POWER SllJO'iPD DOC\JU[t,T UG-1000 UTILllY APPROVALS
AT&:T(PHONE)

COMCAST(CATV)
.llEYEl.QEE8;

CHARITIES HOUSING
1400 PARKMOOR AVE
SAN JOSE, CA 95126

HAI NGUYEN
T: 408-550-8314
E: HNGUYENCICHARITIESHOUSING.ORG
:1£,U !N9o;, =====----,
JT-2 JOINT
JT-J JOfNT
MITHUN
-
D
STOP
EV
EV
VAN
NO

PARKING

EV SS SS SS SS SS W W W W W W IRR
SS SS SS W / / / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD FDC 25 19 19 20 20

CONCRETE
APRON 25 19 CONCRETE APRON 19 202518 SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com ® DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER © 2016 MITHUN, INC. ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42" Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators. All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project. Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above. PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR NO. DATE REVISION CHECK DATE ISSUE CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET VICINITY MAP COUNTY STAMP SPACE: JT-2 05/25/2022 21-086 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT APKB / SA SA / AK 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL 11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 1 04.08.2022 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 5/18/2022 9:42:55 AM GPA RESUBMISSION 1 MITHUN - ~QIE IQ CQ!:lIBM:IQB· FOR CONTRACTOR'S WORK RESPONSIBILITY, -PRELIMINARY- REFER TO JOINT TRENCH TITLE SHEET {JT-1) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LEGEND R 84" x 75" THREE PHASE TRNGORMER PAD (S\IP) WORKING SP.fCE SHOWN 'MTH 8' APRON @] AA£~ X 7' PRIWAR'( MANHCl.E (!M') D AA~f~ X 7' PRI~ MANHCl.E (SW) C PROPOSED 30' x 60' x 24"SPUCE BOX (SVP) 0 PROPOSED24"xJ6"x24'SPLJCEBOX(S\IP) 0 PROPOSED 17° x 30• 1 24"SPUCE BOX (S\IP) D PROPOSED 30' x 48" 1 30' Sl.11 BOX {AT&T) - PROPOSED20" x42°1 24" B-#(r.A1V) - PROPOSED 20" x 42" 1 24" SPLICE BOX (C.LE.C.) -JT-EXISTING JOINTTRENCH -o-EXISTINGGASUNE . EXISTINGELEClRICliWIHOLE .. EXISTINGS\IPVAULTTOBCREI.OCATED SUBSTRUCTURE LOCATIONS MUST BE STAKED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SEE CONSTRUCTION NOTES ON JOINT TRENCH TITLE SHEET (JT-1) REGARDING EXISTING CONDITIONS. 0 10 20 w
I

CIVIC CENTER DR
D
~1£,U !N~7;, =:c-;;;~~,
JT-2 JIJINT JT-3 JOINT
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com ® DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER © 2016 MITHUN, INC. ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42" Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators. All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project. Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above. PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR NO. DATE REVISION CHECK DATE ISSUE CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET VICINITY MAP COUNTY STAMP SPACE: JT-3 05/25/2022 21-086 JOINT TRENCH SECTIONS CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT APKB / SA SA / AK 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL 11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 1 04.08.2022 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 5/18/2022 9:42:55 AM GPA RESUBMISSION 1 -PRELIMINARY- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION --36"-- );, CSD 12"MIN c--tTI i>l --36"-- [I] SECTION HS

SECTION U
--36"--
~-iCSD
IT]
--36"--
[I]
4" SANDBED
SECTION H6
SECTION U1
i>l
--36"
--36"--
4" 4"SANDBED
SECTION H SECTION H1
--36"--
~i
--36"--
4'' SANDBED
"'z
~!-f--'---'- 12"M~ ,N~ITJ-s _61J_._,I
4"SANDBED
SECTION H7 SECTION H8
SECTION V SECTION W1
--36"--
CSD
12"MIN
--36"--
12"MING!
SECTION W2
--36"--
--36"--
1dl
____r---12_"MI_N.,_ -~-61J- }
4'' SANDBED
SECTION P1
ABBREVIATIONS:
[E] PRl~ARY (SVP)

SECTION X
c::-::----::----==c-----------, -------------[fil SECONDARY (SVP) fill STREETUGHT(SVP) f---------~~-----------j [g CATV (COMCAST)
IT] PHONE (AT&T) ~1r,u IN~7:, ==~~----,

IQ) GAS (PG&E)
[[] flBEROPTIC(c.L.E.C.)
JT-2 JOINT JT-3 JOINT
MITHUN
-
D
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN - LEVEL 1
LINCOLN STREET EXISTING CHURCHNEW AFFORDABLE MULTIFAMILY BUILDING CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET VICINITY MAP 1927400 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E form/work 2585 UNIVERSITY AVE. SAN DIEGO, CA 92104 T: 619.269.4423 05/25/2022 DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER CHECK NO. DATE REVISION DATE ISSUE 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 08.23.2021 GPA APPLICATION SET 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN - LEVEL 1 A NORTH L1.0 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL 6 7 7 D D
5 5 LOW DECORATIVE GARDEN WALL (36" MAX). ACTIVE FORECOURT WITH ENHANCED PAVING, SEATING, LANDSCAPE BOULDERS & TREE GRATE. PASSIVE FORECOURT WITH TREE GRATE, SEATING, LANDSCAPE BOULDERS & SOFTER PAVING MATERIALS (D.G. /DECORATIVE PEA-GRAVEL PAVING). CONCRETE WALKWAY. EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK TO REMAIN. NEW PUBLIC SIDEWALK. PRIVATE RESIDENT PATIOS. LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS KEY 532176
910111213 161718192021 EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN. STORMWATER TREATMENT BASIN: SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. PRIMARY ENTRY COURT WITH ENHANCED PAVING AND CONCRETE SEATWALLS WITH WOOD SLATS. TREE WELLS IN SIDEWALK @ CIVIC CENTER DRIVE. CONTIGUOUS LANDSCAPED PARKWAY @ LINCOLN STREET. NEW 6-FT PERFORATED METAL PANEL FENCE (WITH MAINTENANCE ACCESS) TO MATCH TRASH ENCLOSURE AND OTHER BUILDING GUARDRAILS. SEE ARCH. DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFO. SHORT-TERM BIKE PARKING (QTY: 8 BIKES). DRIVEWAY. STEPPED CONCRETE PERIMETER. RAISED RECREATIONAL AREA WITH SYNTHETIC TURF. RAISED PLANTERS. LANDSCAPE BOULDERS OR SMOOTH CONCRETE FAUX BOULDERS. DINING COURT WITH BBQ COUNTER. RECREATION AREA WITH OUTDOOR PING PONG TABLE & SEATING. BREAK-OUT SPACE WITH SEATING. D.G. PATHWAY (EMERGENCY ACCESS). 2223 4 8 1514
9 11
9 12 CANDIDATE PLANT LEGEND 13
8 8
8 CONCEPTUAL SITE LIGHTING KEY 14
4 4 F
F
9 1
1 1
2 3
4 4
6 6
7 7
9 9
9 9
9 9 9 10 14 14
4 15 12
4 23 STREET TREES UTILITY & TREE PROTECTION NOTES: r-,;-,5-"0 -l'--o·- · -----------------o/<'.][:J MIN5'0FSEPARATIONIS PRO\r1DEOBETWEENTREESANDUTILITIES.'M,EN LOCATED'MTHIN 5'AROOTBARRIERl'l1LL BE PRO\r1DED ROOT BARRIERS FOR SIDEWALK PROTECTION WILL BE 16' LONG OR EXTEND TO DRIP LINE ('I;: Tl-lEMATURETREE,AND'MLL BE 1.5'DEEP,ANOCENTEREDONTREES STREET TREES FRONTING THE PRD.ECT SITE ALONG Tl-IE PUBLIC R.O.W. WILL BE COORDINATED Will-I STREET DEPARTMENT AND CITY ARBORIST FOR THE TYPE, LOCATION, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE.
-~ 12' POLE LIGHT

EB BOLLARD LIGH T

RECESSED STEP LIGH T
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0

BOTANICALNAME(COMMONNAME)
PROJECT STREET TREES:

LINCOLN STREET·
O OLEAEUROPAEA·sw
0 ANHILL'
(FRUITLESS OLIVE) Cl\r1CCENTERDRIVE

CERCISCANADENSIS
(EASTERN REDBUD)

ENTRY COURT TREE (SUCH AS)
ELI<OVs S. 'CITY SPR'11''

DWARF ZELKOVA)

OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL'

FRUITLESS OLIVE)

CERCISOCCIOEN TALIS

WESTERN REDBUD)
YRUSC. 'CAPITAL'

CAPITAL FLOWERING PEAR)
l.£VEL 2 COURTYARD TREES (SUCH AS)·
(FRUITI.fSSOLIVE)

HEIGHT(FT)
36" BOX V.LOW 36" BOX MOO
24" BOX MOO
36" BOX V. LOW
2-4" BOX V. LOW 15- 20 2-4" BOX MOD 25- J5
O OLEAEUROPAEA'SWANHILL' 36"BOX V. LOW AGONIS F. 'AFTER OARK' 24" BOX LOW 15- 20 (AFTER DARK PEPPERMINT TREE)
CHITALPA TASHKEN TESIS 24" BOX MOO 20- 30
(CHITALPA)
PITTOSPORUM TENUIFOLIUM 15- GAL MOD 15- 25
(KOHUHU)
ROBINIA P.'PURPL.£ROBE'
(PURPLE ROBE LOCUST)
24" BOX LOW
PRUNUSCAROLINIANA 24"BOX
(CAROLINA CHERRY)

SECONDARYACCEN T TREES(SUCHAS)
OACER PAL.MATUM'RHOOE ISLANDRE0' 15- GAL
(JAPANESE MAPLE)
ARBU TU S'MARINA' 15- GAL
(MARINA MADRON[)
O LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS 15- GAL (BRISBANE BOX)
ACACIASTENOPH \'LLA 15- GAL
(SHOE- STRING ACACIA)
COTINUS COGG YGRIA 15- GAL
(SMOKETREE)

PARKINGAREATREES(SUCHAS)
ORHUSLANCEA 24"BOX
(AFRICAN SUMAC)
GEl.£RAPAR\r1FlORA 24"BOX
o(AUSTRALIANl'l1LLOW)
PITTOSPORUM TENUIFOUUM 15- GAL
(KOHUHU)
STORMWATER TREATMEN T PLANTINGS (SUCH AS):

CAREXSPP 1 GAL
(SEDGE) MUHLENBERGIASPP 1 GAL
(MUHLY)
JIJNCUSSPP. 1 GAL
(RUSH)
CAREXSUBFUSCA 1 GAL
(RUSTY SEDGE)
SHRUBS/SUCCUL.£N TS/GROUNDCOVERS/VINES (SUCH AS):
m:Jl LEPTOSPERMUMS.CVS 5GAL (DWFTEATREE) WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA 5GAL (COAST ROSEMARY)
RHAMNUSC.'EVECASE' SGAL
(DWl"COFFEEBERRY)

LOMANORA LONGIFOLIA'TANIKA' SGAL
(TANIKALOMANDRA)
GRE\r1 LLEA'NOELLI I' SGAL
(NOEL'SGREVILLEA)

ACACIA 'COUSIN ITT SGAL
(DWI" RIVER WATTLE)
ARCTOSTAPH\'LOSSPP. SGAL
(MANZANITA)
ASPARAGUS D. 'MYERS' 1GAL
(MYER'S FERN)
DIETESBICOLOR 1 GAL
(FORTNIGH T LILY)
CHONDROPETALUMTECTORUM 1 GAL (CAPE RUSH)
POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM 1 GAL
(WESTERN SWORD FERN)
MYOPORUMSPP 1 GAL
(CREEPINGMYOPORUM)
LANTANASELlOWIANA 1 GAL
(TRAILING LANTANA)
ERIGERON KAR \r1NSKIANUS 1 GAL (SANTA BARBARA DAISY)
ROSEMARINUS SPP. 1 GAL
(ROSEMARY)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LOW
LOW
,oo ,oo
NOD

LOW LOW
LOW
,00
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
,oo
LOW
LOW
NOO
LOW
LOW

LOW LOW
20- 4()
15- 25
LJ'\
'
TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET VICINITY MAP 1927400 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E form/work 2585 UNIVERSITY AVE. SAN DIEGO, CA 92104 T: 619.269.4423 05/25/2022 DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER CHECK NO. DATE REVISION DATE ISSUE 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 08.23.2021 GPA APPLICATION SET 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN - LEVEL 2 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN - LEVEL 2 A NORTH L2.0 LOW DECORATIVE GARDEN WALL (36" MAX). ACTIVE FORECOURT WITH ENHANCED PAVING, SEATING, LANDSCAPE BOULDERS & TREE GRATE. PASSIVE FORECOURT WITH TREE GRATE, SEATING, LANDSCAPE BOULDERS & SOFTER PAVING MATERIALS (D.G. /DECORATIVE PEA-GRAVEL PAVING). CONCRETE WALKWAY. EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK TO REMAIN. NEW PUBLIC SIDEWALK. PRIVATE RESIDENT PATIOS. LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS KEY 532176 910111213 161718192021 EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN. STORMWATER TREATMENT BASIN: SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. PRIMARY ENTRY COURT WITH ENHANCED PAVING AND CONCRETE SEATWALLS WITH WOOD SLATS. TREE WELLS IN SIDEWALK @ CIVIC CENTER DRIVE. CONTIGUOUS LANDSCAPED PARKWAY @ LINCOLN STREET. NEW 6-FT PERFORATED METAL PANEL FENCE (WITH MAINTENANCE ACCESS) TO MATCH TRASH ENCLOSURE AND OTHER BUILDING GUARDRAILS. SEE ARCH. DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFO. SHORT-TERM BIKE PARKING (QTY: 8 BIKES). DRIVEWAY. STEPPED CONCRETE PERIMETER. RAISED RECREATIONAL AREA WITH SYNTHETIC TURF. RAISED PLANTERS. LANDSCAPE BOULDERS OR SMOOTH CONCRETE FAUX BOULDERS. DINING COURT WITH BBQ COUNTER. RECREATION AREA WITH OUTDOOR PING PONG TABLE & SEATING. BREAK-OUT SPACE WITH SEATING. D.G. PATHWAY (EMERGENCY ACCESS). 2223 4 8 1514 IRRIGATION DESIGN STATEMENT ·····IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT STANDARDS IRRIGATION FIGURES MAWA ETWU ·TURF AREA CONCEPTUAL SITE LIGHTING KEY LANDSCAPE WATER EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST SEE L1.0 FOR PLANT LEGEND 16 17 18 18 18 18 18 19 7 7 7 7 21 20 E E CC 23 23 22 IRRIGATION DESIGN FOR RECYCLED WATER: 1-,-;16-.. c-,·--0- ..--------------,:JD 0 0 0 0 0 0 -~ 12' POLE LIGHT 0 0 0 EB BOLLARD LIGHT 0 0 - RECESSED STEP LIGHT 0 0 TOTAL ... REA: 13829SF" STORMW ... TER ... REA: 1689 Sf ALLOTI-IERL ... NDSCAPE AREAS:121 40SF (49.4)(0.62)(0.58x 13829SF)K 245,662GAL/!1s (49.4)(0.62)(0.J x1 2140Sf)/0.9K 12J,941G,,.Lf,1. (49.4)(0.62)(0.5 x1 689SF")/0.9K28,739GAL/!1s TOTAL- 152,680 GAL/YR Tl-IE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED TO REDUCE Tl-IE OVERALL WATER REQUIRED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL IRRIG ... TION. ALONG 1:~f[f1~~N~~ci:~~s ~[LL~~T u~~ii~6A~, OROER TO COMPLY BOTI-1 1111TH TH E STATE AND CITY WATER CONSERVATIONOROINANCES.THESE INQ.UDE ET-8ASEO'SM ... RT' ~~~~~lff<i: 6~~: l~l~AR:: !~NDS~Ei'P~~~~o~E?"-auu~~LERS PRESSURIZED MAINLI NE PIPING \'<ILL BE CL. 315 PVC. & BURIED f,HNIMUM18" NON- PRESSURIZEO LATERALSWILLBESCH. 40PVCORCL 315 PVC & BURIED MINIMUM 12" AN 'RP'- TYPE 8ACKflOW PREVENTER WILL BE INSTALLED NEAR TI-IEPRO.CCT POINT- OF- CONNECTION SUBSIJRFACE IN- LJNEDRIP IRRIGATIONSHALL BE TORO DL2000,NETAFIM, ORAPPROVEDEQIJIVALENT, NO OVERHEAD OR SPRAY IRRIGATION WILL BE UTILIZED ALL ONSITE IRRIGATION WILL BE DESIGNED FOR RECYCLED WATER USE AND WILL COMPLY WI TH ALL RECYU..ED WATER REGULATIONS BYCITYOFSANT ... CL ... RA,S81\R ANDDEP ... RTMENT OFDRINKING WATER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LJ'\ ' EXISTING TREE PLAN LINCOLN STREET NEW AFFORDABLE MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGCIVIC CENTER DRIVE TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET VICINITY MAP 1927400 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E form/work 2585 UNIVERSITY AVE. SAN DIEGO, CA 92104 T: 619.269.4423 05/25/2022 DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER CHECK NO. DATE REVISION DATE ISSUE 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 08.23.2021 GPA APPLICATION SET 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 141 EXISTING TREE PLAN A NORTH L3.0 EXISTING TREE KEY 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 EXISTING TREE LEGEND EXISTING TREE NOTES 150 149 148 147 146 132 133 134 135 136 137 139 140 142 143 138 144 145 SUMMARY: If I IL ---------------1 ... _J_ :E r-1/-16-"c-7'--Q-" --------------~/~[Y Q =PROTECT IN PLACE X - TO BE REMOVED t t ---------,l X \ \.l X CONDI TION 1- POOR I TREE TYPE DIA.(IN) 5- EXCELHNT ACTl ON OLIVc OllVc OLIVc SWEETGUM S\lr'EETGUM S\lr'EETGUM OLIVc SWEETGUM SWEETGUM OllVc PURPL£ LEAF PLUt.1 OllVc AFRICANFERNPINE AFRICANFERNPINE OllVc OllVc OllVc OllVc OllVc 11 ,7,7 16,9,5 16, 15 11 ,7,7, 4 13,10 4, 3,3, 2 16,15 10,10,9 17, 14 12, 10, 70,9 res "° res "° "° "° res "° "° ,cs "° ,cs "° "° ,cs ,cs "° ,cs ,cs 1 INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS TAKEN FROM ARBORIST'S REPOR T PREPAREDBY HORTSCIENCE/8ARTLETT CONSULTING(325RAYST., PL.£ASANTON, CA94566)DATE003- 06- 2020. 2 TREENUMBERINGCONVENTIONUSEDSOAS TOALIGNWITHNUMBERING USEO IN ARBORIST'S REPORT. 3 'M-IERETREESHAOMORETiiANTRUNK,THE DIAMETERSOF INDIVIDUAL TRUNKS WERE ADDEO TOGETHER TO ESTABLISH THE DIAMETER CLASS FOR f.HTIGATION PURPOSES 4. TREES INL£GENDt.1ARKED WIT11 ASTERISK(•): NOT INCWDED IN PRELIMINARY ARBORIST'S REPOR T MIN 24" BOX TREES PROVIDED•: ' TREES PERMITTED BY T11E CITY FOR REMOVAL WILL BE REPLACED AT A MINIMUM 2: 1 RATIO WIT11 24-INCH BOX SPECIMEN TREES REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE RHWVE REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE Uwl E LJ'\ ' SUPPLEMENTAL LANDSCAPE EXHIBITS TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE SHEET NUMBER PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED FOR CIVIC CENTER DRIVE LINCOLN STREET VICINITY MAP 1927400 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E form/work 2585 UNIVERSITY AVE. SAN DIEGO, CA 92104 T: 619.269.4423 05/25/2022 DESIGN PARTNER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT DESIGNER CHECK NO. DATE REVISION DATE ISSUE 12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 08.23.2021 GPA APPLICATION SET 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 L4.0 CROSS-SECTION THROUGH LEVEL 1 COURTYARD D CROSS-SECTION THROUGH LEVEL 2 COURTYARD E CROSS-SECTION THROUGH LEVEL 2 COURTYARD C CROSS-SECTION @ FORECOURT & COURTYARD F LANDSCAPE ELEMENT IMAGERY B CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING IMAGERY A 3/16"=1'-0" 3/16"=1'-0" ENHANCED PAVING 0 FORECOUR T L LIN COL.N 7 STREET TREE UPLIGHT POLE LIGHT WALL LIGH T PASSIVE FORECOURT AREA- CASUAL, QUIET, SOFT PAV1NG MATERIALS BOLLARD LIGHT LJ\ ------ ------\ -- EV
EV
VAN
NO

PARKING
EV
LEGEND

PROPERTY LINE

SETBACK LINE

FIRE HYDRANT

STREET LIGHT

PROPOSED TREE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS PROJECT NORTH
CIVIC CENTER DR.

LINCOLN
ST.
5 STORY APARTMENTS
5 STORY APARTMENTS

SETBACK
LEVEL-2 COURTYARD
(E) TRANSFORMER
(N) TRANSFORMER
S.J.T.D, S.E.D.
(E) WOOD FENCE O/ 2-3' RETAINING WALL
(E) FENCE
(N) DRIVEWAY FOR PARKING ACCESS

ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE

PRIMARY ENTRY

FOURCOURT
1651 TRITON CT
1661 TRITON CT
1671 TRITON CT
1681 TRITON CT
1691 TRITON CT
1700 LINCOLN ST
1701 TRITON CT
(N) LANDSCAPE WALL, S.L.D.
(E) CHAIN LINK FENCE
EE
T
G
FH
(N) SIDEWALK
(N) WATER AND FIRE , SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS

STAIR ACCESS TO ROOF
25'-0"

SIDEWALK
10'-0"

SETBACK
5'-0"

SETBACK
67'-7"

SETBACK
10'-0"
5'-0" MIN. SETBACK
6'-0"
(N) IRRIGATION SERVICE WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTER, S.C.D.

STAIR ACCESS TO ROOF
(N) DRIVEWAY FOR GARAGE PARKING ACCESS, S.C.D.
15'-0" 10'-0" 35'-0"
(N) DEDICATED PATH FOR TRASH PUSH AND PULL SERVICES
SEE NOTES BELOW FOR TRASH SERVICES.

FH
FH

TRASH STAGING AREA
_______ 2 A1.01
(N) NEW FENCE AND GATE, S.L.D.

SIDEWALK

EASEMENT
5'-6"
10'-0" 4'-6"

1. FOR TRASH PICK UP, PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: A. A DEDICATED PATH ADJACENT TO THE GARAGE DRIVEWAY IS PROVIDED FOR PUSH AND PULL SERVICES. B. COLLECTION TRUCK WILL PARK ON THE STREET, AND WORKER WILL ACCESS THE STAGING AREA VIA THE DEDICATED PATH, WILL ROLL THE BINS OUT TO THE STREET TO BE SERVICED BY THE TRUCK, THEN RETURN TO THE STAGING AREA. BINS WILL NOT REMAIN ON THE STREET. C. COLLECTION FOR RECYCLING AND GARBAGE WILL OCCUR ON SEPARATE DAYS. D. BINS WILL BE MAXIMUM 3 CUBIC YARD.

NOTES:

ASSUMED STREET PARKING ZONE

TRASH COLLECTION TRUCK
(SHOWN FOR REFERENCE)
DEDICATED PATH FOR TRASH PUSH AND PULL SERVICE. MANEUVERING SHOWN IN RED DASH FOR REFERENCE. SEE NOTES BELOW FOR DETAILS ON TRASH SERVICES.

TRASH STAGING AREA
TRASH ROOM INSIDE BUILDING. FOR MORE DETAILS ON TRASH ROOM AND STAGING AREA, REFER TO 1 / A8.50 SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:10:50 PM
A1.01
05/25/2022
1927400

ARCHITECTURAL SITE
PLAN

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1 1/16" = 1'-0" SITE PLAN
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
2 1/16" = 1'-0" SITE PLAN -TRASH COLLECTION
_J
_j
- ----\
a
o---0
0 MITH UN
:G - CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
E9
260 SF 250 SF
309 SF
FDC A
A3.12
3 A3.123
M SHOP
102

BIKE RM
103
PANTRY
105B

COMMUNITY RM
105

KITCHEN
STAIR 1 ST1.1
A3.12
1 A3.121
A3.12
2 A3.122
A3.11
2 A3.11
2 108 CLASS 1 BIKE RACKS
42 REQ'D
STAIR 2 ST2.1
RR
109
OFFICE
106A
ELEV. CTRL. 107

FIRE PUMP
118
DWH
117
A3.11
1 A3.11
1 ELEC RM
116

MPOE /TEL
115

PRIMARY ENTRY
B
C
F
G
H
I
1 2 3 4 5 5.3 5.5 6 6.4 7 8 9
13'-2" 33'-7" 13'-2" 9'-10" 6'-4" 17'-5" 15'-3" 18'-5" 13'-2" 32'-5" 32'-8" 6'-0" 73'-11" 23'-3" 13'-2" 45'-3"

GARAGE EXHAUST

OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR
4 / A8.02
EERC
110
4 / A8.02

PARKING
P1
73' - 6"

HEAT RM
120
MTG RM
106D
74' - 10 1/2"
74' - 11 3/8"
74' - 10 1/2"
74' - 8 1/2"

TENANT SERVICES
106C

SERVER & COPY
106B
STOR. 105A CORRIDOR
SOUTH
C1A
TRASH
101
111
3BR-D 112
2BR-A
114
2BR-A
113
SBR-D

LAUNDRY
104
LOBBY
L1
MAIL

FRONT DESK
JAN. 108
STOR. L1A

STORAGE
119
2 / A8.01
1 / A8.06

DEDICATED PATH FOR TRASH PUSH AND PULL SERVICES
72' - 8 13/32"
A3.01b
1 2 A3.01b
A3.02b
1 A3.02b
2 A3.03b
2 3

ELEVATOR
2 ELEVATOR
1 _______ 1 A8.10

1.82%

4.68%

BOLLARDS

PROJECT NORTH

FLOOR PLAN LEGEND

PROPERTY LINE

SETBACK LINE

FACP FIRE ACCESS CONTROL PANEL

FLOOR PLAN NOTES

1. SEE 8 SERIES FOR ENLARGED PLANS WITH INTERIOR WALL TAGS NOT SHOWN IN OVERALLPLAN, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND TYPICAL UNIT TYPES. 2. SEE EXITING DIAGRAMS FOR DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS. 3. FOR TYP. PLANTERS AND BIORETENTION PLANTERS INFORMATION, S.L.D. AND S.C.D. 4. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL FLOOR CEILING TAGS. 5. SEE G SERIES FOR RATING DIAGRAMS FOR FIRE RATED WALL INFORMATION.

SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
6/27/2022 2:23:04 PM
A2.01
05/25/2022
1927400
LEVEL-1

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - GROUND
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

MITH UN
-----0
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
\
\
C
EB
A
224
SBR-A
212
3BR-B_3
207
2BR-B
205
3BR-B
201
2BR-B
203
SBR-A
209
SBR-A
211
3BR-B_2
220
2BR-B
A3.12
3 A3.123
226
2BR-B

COURTYARD

SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS
A3.12
1 A3.121
A3.12
2 A3.122
A3.11
2 A3.11
2 214
1BR-A
219
3BR-A
216
1BR-A
218
1BR-A
206
3BR-B
202
2BR-B
A3.11
1 A3.11
1 208
SBR-A
STAIR 2
B
C
F
G
H
I
1 2 3 4 5 5.3 5.5 6 6.4 7 8 9
32'-8" 6'-0" 73'-11" 23'-3" 13'-2" 45'-3"
47'-0" 13'-2" 33'-7" 13'-2" 9'-10" 6'-4" 17'-5" 15'-3" 18'-5" 13'-2" 32'-5" 219'-10"
ELEC. CLOSET

ELECTRICAL CLOSET
200D
222
2BR-B
204
SBR-A
221
3BR-B
223
1BR-A
STAIR 1
213
3BR-C
CL.
225
SBR-A
2'-0"
210
1BR-C
215
1BR-B
217
1BR-B
CTYD

COURTYARD
C2A

CORRIDOR SOUTH
C2B

CORRIDOR NORTH

STORAGE
200B
TRASH
200E
STOR
200A
ELEC. CLOSET
10'-4 1/2"
4'-1"
A3.02b
1 A3.02b
2 A3.03b
2 3

JANITOR
F
02 FLOOR PLAN LEGEND

PROPERTY LINE

SETBACK LINE

FACP FIRE ACCESS CONTROL PANEL

PROJECT NORTH

FLOOR PLAN NOTES

1. SEE 8 SERIES FOR ENLARGED PLANS WITH INTERIOR WALL TAGS NOT SHOWN IN OVERALLPLAN, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND TYPICAL UNIT TYPES. 2. SEE EXITING DIAGRAMS FOR DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS. 3. FOR TYP. PLANTERS AND BIORETENTION PLANTERS INFORMATION, S.L.D. AND S.C.D. 4. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL FLOOR CEILING TAGS. 5. SEE G SERIES FOR RATING DIAGRAMS FOR FIRE RATED WALL INFORMATION.

SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
6/27/2022 2:23:13 PM
A2.02
05/25/2022
1927400
LEVEL-2 PODIUM

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP
1 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN - PODIUM
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
Q
---0
------ft
------1-----r--------------1---- ---0
i i i
i i i ----i-----t--------------i---- ---0
i i i
i i i
i i i ' ' ' I I I
----------- --1 ' ' ' ------t-----t------------------ ---0 ' I
'
I
0 ---0
--tt
---0
EB
- MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
f.: ----\_\
l j \ ----- ------\
A
A3.12
3 A3.123

COURTYARD BELOW
A3.12
1 A3.121
A3.12
2 A3.122
A3.11
2 A3.11
2 A3.11
1 A3.11
1 B
C
F
G
H
I
1 2 3 4 5 5.3 5.5 6 6.4 7 8 9
47'-0" 13'-2" 33'-7" 13'-2" 9'-10" 6'-4" 17'-5" 15'-3" 18'-5" 13'-2" 32'-5" 219'-10"
324
SBR-A
312
3BR-B_3
317
1BR-B
307
2BR-B
305
3BR-B
301
2BR-B
303
SBR-A
309
SBR-A
311
3BR-B_2
320
2BR-C
326
2BR-B
STAIR 1 ST1.3
314
1BR-A
319
3BR-A
316
1BR-A
318
1BR-A
306
3BR-B
304
SBR-A
308
SBR-A
STAIR 2 ST2.3
TRASH
300E
315
1BR-B
322
2BR-B
302
2BR-B
310
1BR-C

ELECTRICAL CLOSET
300D
STOR
300A

COURTYARD BELOW
321
3BR-B
323
1BR-A
ELEC. CLOSET
CL.
2HR HORIZONTAL EXIT W/ 90 MIN. RATED DOOR ON HOLD OPEN (CLOSES W/ ACTIVATION OF FIRE ALARM), TYP.

C3A

CORRIDOR SOUTH
C3B

CORRIDOR NORTH
313
3BR-C

STORAGE
300B
325
SBR-A
ELEC. CLOSET
7 / A8.01
6 / A8.01
1 / A8.04
1 / A8.03 2 / A8.04 5 / A8.01 3 / A8.05
2 / A8.06
2 / A8.05 3 / A8.02
A3.02b
1 A3.02b
2 A3.03b
2 3

JANITOR

SEISMIC JOINT WALKWAY BRIDGE TO BE NON COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION F
10 FLOOR PLAN LEGEND

PROPERTY LINE

SETBACK LINE

FACP FIRE ACCESS CONTROL PANEL

PROJECT NORTH

FLOOR PLAN NOTES

1. SEE 8 SERIES FOR ENLARGED PLANS WITH INTERIOR WALL TAGS NOT SHOWN IN OVERALLPLAN, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND TYPICAL UNIT TYPES. 2. SEE EXITING DIAGRAMS FOR DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS. 3. FOR TYP. PLANTERS AND BIORETENTION PLANTERS INFORMATION, S.L.D. AND S.C.D. 4. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL FLOOR CEILING TAGS. 5. SEE G SERIES FOR RATING DIAGRAMS FOR FIRE RATED WALL INFORMATION.

SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
6/27/2022 2:23:22 PM
A2.03
05/25/2022
1927400
LEVEL-3-4

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 3-4 FLOOR PLAN
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
0 -----~-----~-------------+-------0
I I I
i i i
-----~-----~-------------+-------0 I I I I
i i i i '
I i i i
I I I i i i ________________ j _____ i ______________ i - ◊
_____ i _____ i ------------- i -------0
I
'
I
'
I
n7
0 0
- -=- '1:J..-.... ........... .......j:r=7 .db..-t="t!------......&=7:!!6....~ +--+-..... ---lf=7~ -f=bciiiiiiii(:::Jl+ ............ ~ ~~dr=="4-I -------Q i

MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
EB
A
A3.12
3 A3.123
A3.12
1 A3.121
A3.12
2 A3.122
A3.11
2 A3.11
2 A3.11
1 A3.11
1 B
C
F
G
H
I
1 2 3 4 5 5.3 5.5 6 6.4 7 8 9
524
SBR-A
512
3BR-B_3
507
2BR-B
505
3BR-B
501
2BR-B
509
SBR-A
511
3BR-B_2
520
2BR-B
526
2BR-B
514
1BR-A
519
3BR-A
516
1BR-A
518
1BR-A
506
3BR-B
504
SBR-A 508
SBR-A
515
1BR-B
ELEC
522
2BR-B
513
3BR-C
502
2BR-B
510
1BR-C
525
SBR-A
523
1BR-A
521
3BR-B

ELECTRICAL CLOSET
STAIR 2 ST2.5
CL.
2HR HORIZONTAL EXIT W/ 90 MIN. RATED DOOR ON HOLD OPEN (CLOSES W/ ACTIVATION OF FIRE ALARM), TYP. 32'-8" 6'-0" 73'-11" 23'-3" 13'-2" 45'-3"
47'-0" 13'-2" 33'-7" 13'-2" 9'-10" 6'-4" 17'-5" 15'-3" 18'-5" 13'-2" 32'-5" 219'-10"
C5A

CORRIDOR SOUTH
C5B

CORRIDOR NORTH
503
SBR-A
513
3BR-C
517
1BR-B
TRASH

STORAGE
STOR

STORAGE
STAIR 1 ST1.5
A3.02b
1 A3.02b
2 A3.03b
2 3

JANITOR

SEISMIC JOINT

PROJECT NORTH

FLOOR PLAN LEGEND

PROPERTY LINE

SETBACK LINE

FACP FIRE ACCESS CONTROL PANEL

FLOOR PLAN NOTES

1. SEE 8 SERIES FOR ENLARGED PLANS WITH INTERIOR WALL TAGS NOT SHOWN IN OVERALLPLAN, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND TYPICAL UNIT TYPES. 2. SEE EXITING DIAGRAMS FOR DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS. 3. FOR TYP. PLANTERS AND BIORETENTION PLANTERS INFORMATION, S.L.D. AND S.C.D. 4. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL FLOOR CEILING TAGS. 5. SEE G SERIES FOR RATING DIAGRAMS FOR FIRE RATED WALL INFORMATION.

SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
6/27/2022 2:23:27 PM
A2.05
05/25/2022
1927400
LEVEL-5

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL-5 FLOOR PLAN
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

Q Q Q MITH UN
------~-----~-------------~----- ---0
6 ------1-----t-------------1----- ---0 l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G i i i
i i i -----1 T 7----- ---0
i i i
i i i '
I i i i ' I I
-------r-----~-------------
i i i ---t-----t-------------i----- ---0
◊
6 -1 ' ---0
- ---0
C
---0
EB
A
A3.12 3 A3.12 3
A3.12 1 A3.12 1
A3.12 2 A3.12 2
A3.11 2
A3.11 2
A3.11 1
A3.11 1

ROOF BELOW
BCFGHI 1 2 3 4 5 5.3 5.5 6 6.4 7 8 9 32'-8" 6'-0" 73'-11" 23'-3" 13'-2" 45'-3" 47'-0" 13'-2" 33'-7" 13'-2" 9'-10" 6'-4" 17'-5" 15'-3" 18'-5" 13'-2" 32'-5" 219'-10"
195'-8"

PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAYS

SOLAR THERMAL ARRAYS

2.83%

4.25%

3.24%

3.24%

2.92%

4.76%

9.21%

3.24%
_______ 2 A2.06
_______ 3 A2.06
A3.02b 1
A3.02b 2
A3.03b 2
3 PROJECT NORTH

FLOOR PLAN LEGEND

PROPERTY LINE

SETBACK LINE

FACP FIRE ACCESS CONTROL PANEL
GH

2.08% 128' - 9 3/32"
C 1

2.08%

FLOOR PLAN NOTES

1. SEE 8 SERIES FOR ENLARGED PLANS WITH INTERIOR WALL TAGS NOT SHOWN IN OVERALLPLAN, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND TYPICAL UNIT TYPES. 2. SEE EXITING DIAGRAMS FOR DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS. 3. FOR TYP. PLANTERS AND BIORETENTION PLANTERS INFORMATION, S.L.D. AND S.C.D. 4. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL FLOOR CEILING TAGS. 5. SEE G SERIES FOR RATING DIAGRAMS FOR FIRE RATED WALL INFORMATION.

SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:11:26 PM
A2.06
05/25/2022
1927400

ROOF PLAN

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 1 1/8" = 1'-0" ROOF PLAN
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
ASSUME SCUPPER DRAIN WITH OVERFLOW FOR ALL ROOF DRAIN, UON., TYP. 2 1/8" = 1'-0" ROOF PLAN - PENTHOUSE N 3 1/8" = 1'-0" ROOF PLAN -PENTHOUSE S '
I -,
!
'
!

I '--------------------------
1 i --+--
:
i
◊
i
!
I
i
'
6 1
"Ct i
i
i
i
i
I
'
i
I
i
' l__
I
i
'
!
I
i
i
'
I
i
i
-7 '
!
!
I
i
'
!
I
i
i
'
I ---7
i
'
-, I
I
i
i
I
i -7--,
I
i
i
'
!
!
oi
!
-,
!
I
i
'
!
I
i
I
i
'
I
i ---7
i
i -7 I
i
i
'
I -Ti
i
'
!
I
i
!
I
i
i
'
!
I ---r
I
i
'
----~-
I
i
i
I
j_ - --0 !
I
i
i
'
!
I
i
'

MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
EB
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"

PROPERTY LINE - WEST
45-DEGREE SETBACK PLANE
2 5 1A
8 1C 10 #
PROPOSED FDC 6B
AVERAGE GRADE ALONG CIVIC CENTER DR.
73'-11"
10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 14'-6"

TYPE IIIA
3 2
TYPE I
1B
54'-6"
5" 58'-9 1/2" FROM AVERAGE GRADE ALONG CIVIC CENTER DR. 8 2 6A
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"

PROPERTY LINE - SOUTH

PROPERTY LINE - NORTH

SETBACK
EDGE OF CIVIC CENTER DR.
10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 14'-6"
1'-3 1/2"
73'-0"

TYPE IIIA TYPE I
54'-6"
60'-6" FROM AVERAGE GRADE ALONG LINCOLN STREET

AVERAGE GRADE ALONG LINCOLN
72'-2 1/2"
5 3 3 1C 3 7 8
5 1B 2 1A 2 1A 1B 10
6B 3 1C
6A 8
8 7
2 A3.01
1 A3.01
3 A3.03
2 A3.02
1 A3.03
2 A3.03
1 A3.02

STUCCO - WHITE

STUCCO - BLUE

STUCCO - LIGHT GREY

FIBER CEMENT PLANK
- DARK GREY
THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD SIDING; ALT. FIBER CEMENT PLANK

NOT USED

MATERIAL LEGEND
1A
1B
1C
KEY
2 3
4 6A
6B
7 8
9 10

BRAKE METAL PANEL -DARK BRONZE
DARK BRONZE ALUM. WINDOW W/ SUNSHADE WHERE NOTED
DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUM. STOREFRONT

METAL ROLL UP DOOR
PERFORATED METAL PANEL; FENCE / GUARDRAIL
(NOT USED)

LOUVERS -PAINTED TO MATCH WINDOW
5 SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:11:49 PM
A3.01b
05/25/2022
1927400

BUILDING ELEVATIONS

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1 1/8" = 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION - CIVIC CENTER DR
2 1/8" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION - LINCOLN ST.
~-------------;' ,------------------=---=---~MITH UN
/ ,
,
/
/
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 --- -$-
--- +
--- +
- -11- l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
I
_J ~--y---i
'
_J
C
2 A3.01
1 A3.01
3 A3.03
2 A3.02
1 A3.03
2 A3.03
1 A3.02

STUCCO - WHITE

STUCCO - BLUE

STUCCO - LIGHT GREY

CEMENT BOARD
- DARK GREY
THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD SIDING; ALT. CEMENTITIOUS PANEL

NOT USED

MATERIAL LEGEND
1A
1B
1C
KEY
2 3
4 6A
6B
7 8
9 10

BRAKE METAL PANEL -DARK BRONZE
DARK BRONZE ALUM. WINDOW W/ SUNSHADE WHERE NOTED
DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUM. STOREFRONT

METAL ROLL UP DOOR
PERFORATED METAL PANEL; FENCE / GUARDRAIL
(NOT USED)

LOUVERS -PAINTED TO MATCH WINDOW
5 LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
1B 2
1C
3 6B
14'-6" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0"
1A 6A

AVERAGE GRADE ALONG WEST FACADE
74'-1/4"

TYPE IA TYPE IIIA
8 10 5 2
64'-5" FROM AVERAGE GRADE ALONG WEST FACADE
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
6A 1B 1A
1C
AVE. GRADE ALONG NORTH ELEVATION
71'-10"
0" 14'-6" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0"

TYPE I TYPE IIIA
10 8
8 1B

EXISTING FENCE SHOWN DASHED
66'-7" FROM AVERAGE GRADE ALONG NORTH ELEVATION
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:12:06 PM
A3.02b
05/25/2022
1927400

BUILDING ELEVATIONS

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1 1/8" = 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION - AT FORECOURT/COURTYARD 2 1/8" = 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION
<--------- ---- , --- ------ -- - --- --- --- --+
-------------------------- --+
--------------------------- ---+
-------------------------- ---+
, ______ , _____ , ___ ------ -- ---- --- --- --+
Q WQ WW Q ~ 4
Q WQ WW QWQ ~ 4
Q WQ WW QWQ ~ 4
g □ ww □ ~
........ .......... :· ···-··············-······· ·····[D ················-·····•·········• ··· -· ····················· ··· ·1······ ··········-·· .. 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 - MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"

PROPERTY LINE - SOUTH
EDGE OF CIVIC CENTER DR.

PROPERTY LINE - NORTH
10' SETBACK
1A
1C
8'-9" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 14'-6"
AVE. GRADE ALONG WEST ELEVATION
74'-1/4"
1A
2 6A 1B 10 2
8 STAIR PENTHOUSE
54'-6"
5 1B 1B
8 64'-5" FROM AVERAGE GRADE ALONG WEST ELEVATION
2 A3.01 1 A3.01
3 A3.03
2 A3.02 1 A3.03 2 A3.03 1 A3.02

STUCCO - WHITE

STUCCO - BLUE

STUCCO - LIGHT GREY

CEMENT BOARD
- DARK GREY
THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD SIDING; ALT. CEMENTITIOUS PANEL

NOT USED

MATERIAL LEGEND
1A
1B
1C
KEY
234
6A
6B789
10 BRAKE METAL PANEL -DARK BRONZE
DARK BRONZE ALUM. WINDOW W/ SUNSHADE WHERE NOTED
DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUM. STOREFRONT

METAL ROLL UP DOOR
PERFORATED METAL PANEL; FENCE / GUARDRAIL
(NOT USED)

LOUVERS -PAINTED TO MATCH WINDOW
5 LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0"
6A 1B 1B 10 1A 6A 8
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0"
40'-0"
2 1A 6A 1B 6A
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT DESIGNER

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
6/27/2022 2:10:55 PM

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050

12.08.2020
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

BUILDING ELEVATIONS
1927400
05/25/2022
A3.03b
GPA RESUBMISSION 2

PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 1/8" = 1'-0" 1
1/8" = 1'-0"

WEST ELEVATION
2 COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"
3 COURTYARD WEST ELEVATION
z
1::,
:z:

I-
-
:=E
~ /
¥ T][ ~ - rlTff '
J t t t i

C I C I C I C
~ -·BJ BJ ED ED

BJ BJ ED ED
t t t " t t
11 I
.-

EIEI EIEI
0 §lggt) 0 BJ El ED ED, ___
~ I lhilifL-L.II ill I
gggtJI ill I
[
~-
l w
; j I I
i i I '
-- : -- : -~ - ,·-·-, •
0000000 0000 0 0
- a ::;wn r=;w,
n DJDJDJDJ

DJDJDJDJ
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"

PARKING
SBR-A
SBR-A
SBR-A
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 14'-6" 54'-6"
SBR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A

COURTYARD

PROPERTY LINE - SOUTH
EDGE OF CIVIC CENTER DR.
10' SETBACK5' SETBACK

PROPERTY LINE - NORTH
CIVIC CENTER DR.

SBR-D
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
_______ 1 A7.10
JT
3'-0"

JT CLEAR
4'-0"
TREE
4'-0" 6"

STREET PARKING
9'-0"

SIDEWALK
10'-0"
JT CLEAR.
3'-6"
PATIO
7'-2 1/2"
SD
2'-0"
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
54'-6" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 14'-6"
1BR-C
1BR-C
1BR-C
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A 1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A 1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
3BR-A 1BR-A
3BR-A
3BR-A
3BR-A CORRIDOR
SOUTH

BIKE RM

LOBBY M SHOP

PROPERTY LINE - SOUTH
EDGE OF CIVIC CENTER DR.
10' SETBACK5' SETBACK

PROPERTY LINE - NORTH
SBR-A
SBR-A
SBR-A
1BR-C SBR-A
LAUNDRY 3BR-D TRASH

PARKING

STORAGE

STORAGE

STORAGE

STORAGE

CORRIDOR
SOUTH

CORRIDOR
SOUTH

CORRIDOR
SOUTH
CIVIC CENTER DR.

COURTYARD
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:12:56 PM
A3.11
05/25/2022
1927400

BUILDING SECTIONS

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
2 1/8" = 1'-0" SECTION - NORTH / SOUTH 1 1/8" = 1'-0" SECTION - NORTH / SOUTH AT LOBBY - MITH UN
l I I I '
1 I ' I I I
I '

I I I I
' I ' I ' . - I ··I
' ,J, I ' ' I ' I I r I .. I
'
~ . I ' ' I ' l I I I I I __ , ______
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
... I
'.! ~ . I I I I I
I ' --~-- ----- , .....

I ~ ,J, ] ~ D l
- I I
'
- I ' ' r-i I ' I I I I
' I ' I I
I n -l---i:l-,1.:l-,1.•,-1-,-1-,-1;-,• r I I
' I
I I
" I, I, 11 I I
i ' I I " I l I I I I
I
------ ---------------------------------- ---- -+
····-··-··-········-··-··-···+ C
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
3BR-C
3BR-C
3BR-C
3BR-B_2
3BR-B_2
3BR-B_2
3BR-B_2
2BR-B
2BR-B
2BR-B
2BR-B
?
?
?
SBR-A
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
2BR-B
2BR-B
2BR-B
2BR-B
LOBBY
10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 14'-6"
45-DEGREE SETBACK PLANE
STAIR 2
3BR-C
54'-6" PROPERTY LINE - WEST
5' SETBACK

OFFICE CORRIDORCORRIDOR

SOUTH MTGRM
SBR-A
SBR-A
SBR-A
SBR-A
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
SBR-A
SBR-A
SBR-A
SBR-A

ELECTRICAL CLOSET

ELECTRICAL CLOSET

ELECTRICAL CLOSET

ELECTRICAL CLOSET
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
45-DEGREE SETBACK PLANE

PARKING
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A

CORRIDOR
NORTH

CORRIDOR
NORTH

CORRIDOR
NORTH

CORRIDOR
NORTH
10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 14'-6"
54'-6" PROPERTY LINE - EAST EDGE OF LINCOLN ST.
(N) STREET EASEMENT
5' SETBACK

PROPERTY LINE - NORTH

77.90 LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"

PARKING
10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 14'-6"
54'-6" 45-DEGREE SETBACK PLANE PROPERTY LINE - EAST (N) STREET EASEMENT 5' SETBACK

PROPERTY LINE - NORTH

LAUNDRY

PARKING PARKING
FIRE
PUMP

COURTYARD
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:13:19 PM
A3.12
05/25/2022
1927400

BUILDING SECTIONS

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
3 1/8" = 1'-0" SECTION - THROUGH CORRIDOR AT LEVEL 1
1 1/8" = 1'-0" SECTION - THROUGH GARAGE ENTRY
2 1/8" = 1'-0" SECTION - COURTYARD & CONNECTING WALKWAY 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
/ , , - / I j , l ,
· I ----------+-- -
/ n n n n n n n I
, , I
/ I I ------- f -----------.- -- ------- -+--

MITH UN
, ,
/ n n n n n n f l I
, , I I
/ I
------- f ___________ ._ --- - - - - - - -+-- , I /
, n n n n n n l I , 7 I
, I
II /
n
j ----------t , n 7 n n n n , I
/ 7 I
,
, j -- -- - --- --- ~
/ I
---- ----- -+--- I
I ' ,
~ I I I
. I I I
I +-- I I l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
, ,
/ ,
I ,
/ I I ,
, . .... / ' ' I , ,
. /
- - • I , , .... I / , I
, I . , '
I / ,
, .... I . / I , I
I ,
/
lFIT
I . , , I '
I / I - " I I
, , - - I
. /
~-- . I
11 l I
I
I
. - I i
I
1 ,
,
/ ,
,
/ I -+;·"·---- ---- . ,, / n n 7 n n n - / ~ ---- - --- n I , , . / n n n [7 n n - n , , i / ~ ---- - --- .
, ,
n I . / n 7 n n - , , n I
/ ~ ---- - --- -
, , n n 7 n n - n .
/ I I I , , .,_ ---- - ---
// I . -
V
!,_
n l fl r ri u I
1 C
REMOVABLE BOLLARD, TYP.
-2' - 4 1/4"
-1' - 8 1/4" -2' - 4 1/4"
12'-3 7/8"
10'-0"
13'-4 3/4" 20'-1 1/8" 6'-4 1/4"
8 3/4" 4'-6" 4'-8"
MECHANICAL UNIT, S.M.D.
12'-10 7/8"
10'-5 5/8"
4'-5 3/8"
TRASH
101
3 C.Y. BINS, NIC. SHOWN FOR REFERENCE
7'-9 1/8"
PERFORATED METAL PANEL SCREEN MOUNTED ON 6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB 17'-4 5/8"
39'-10 1/8"

TRASH STAGING AREA
FOR TRASH COLLECTION MANEUVER, REFER TO 2 / A1.01
12P12
16BP
20P
50AP
20P
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:13:22 PM
A8.50
05/25/2022
1927400

ENLARGED PLANS
-TRASH ROOM AND
CHUTES

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT

KB / SA

SA / AK
AP

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 1 1/4" = 1'-0" TRASH ROOM - GROUND LEVEL 10 1/4" = 1'-0" TYPICAL TRASH CHUTE ROOM

MITH UN
:@
l."' "CHAll11fS IIOOSl"'-'G
C
DD
CRJ V
PB
2 a
F1 D
Z
P
PC
PaDaa
S
GW
PLC
TV
M
TG
GFP
SPD
EPO
CB
AV
L
N
E
AV

GROUND ROD

GROUND BUS BAR

CABLE TAP BOX

MOTOR CONNECTION

J-HOOK PATHWAY

PANELBOARD RECESSED MOUNTED

BUSWAY HORIZONTAL

SWITCH AND FUSE

CIRCUIT BREAKER

CIRCUIT BREAKER IN ENCLOSURE

DRAWOUT TYPE CIRCUIT BREAKER

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

PANELBOARD SURFACE MOUNTED

BUSWAY RISER WITH PLUG IN UNIT

STEP DOWN TRANSFORMER

GENERATOR

AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH

HEAVY DUTY DISCONNECT SWITCH

HEAVY DUTY DISCONNECT SWITCH WITH FUSE

MOTOR STARTER

COMBINATION MOTOR STARTER/DISCONNECT SWITCH

THERMAL OVERLOAD/DISCONNECT SWITCH

DRAWOUT TYPE SWITCH AND FUSE

CURRENT TRANSFORMER AND KWH METER

GROUND FAULT PROTECTION RELAY

NORMALLY OPEN CONTACT

NORMALLY CLOSED CONTACT

TRANSFORMER

ABBREVIATIONS

JUNCTION BOX, WALL / CEILING MOUNTED

SURGE PROTECTIVE DEVICE

RED PUSH BUTTON MUSHROOM TYPE WITH CLEAR LEXAN PROTECTIVE SHROUD COVER. EPO = EMERGENCY POWER OFF

ACCESS CONTROL CARD READER BACK BOX

VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE
M

INDICATES CIRCUITING

LIGHTING FIXTURE(S), POLE MOUNTED

WALL WASHER, CEILING MOUNTED

EMERGENCY LIGHTING FIXTURE

LIGHTING FIXTURE, WALL MOUNTED

LIGHTING FIXTURE DOWNLIGHT, CEILING MOUNTED

INDICATES SWITCH CONTROL

LIGHTING LEGEND

LIGHTING FIXTURE TYPE
FIXTURE DESIGNATION:

DZP = DAYLIGHTING ZONE PRIMARY DZS = DAYLIGHTING ZONE SECONDARY SZ = DAYLIGHTING ZONE SKYLIGHT
DAYLIGHTING PHOTOCELL. SUBSCRIPT(S) INDICATES LIGHTING CONTROLLED.

OCCUPANCY SENSOR, CEILING MOUNTED. SUBSCRIPT(S) INDICATES FIXTURE(S) CONTROLLED. H - INDICATES HALLWAY TYPE SENSOR.

OUTDOOR PHOTOCELL SENSOR

DATA AND AV DEVICE LEGEND
C
W
TELEPHONE/DATA OUTLET, MOUNT AT 18" AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, TYP. UON, PROVIDE DOUBLE-GANG BOX WITH 1''C TO ABOVE ACCESSIBLE CEILING SPACE. PROVIDE PULL CORD.

COMBINATION DIMMER & OCCUPANCY SENSOR, WALL MOUNTED

POWER AND SIGNAL DEVICE LEGEND

THREE WAY SWITCH

POWER LEGEND
OVERRIDE CONTROL SWITCH. PROVIDE LABEL INDICATING "OVERRIDE LTG/REC CONTROL".

T = TAMPER RESISTANT TYPE OUTLET C
IGD
= ABOVE COUNTER

ISOLATED GROUND

DEDICATED CIRCUIT
====
a6
WP= WEATHERPROOF
#= SPECIAL MOUNTING HEIGHT
CEILING MOUNTED DUPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A
CEILING MOUNTED QUADRUPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A DIMMER SYSTEM LIGHT CONTROL - 3 WAY

DIMMER SYSTEM LIGHT CONTROL

KEYED TYPE SWITCH G
HALF-CONTROLLED QUADRUPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A, (ONE DUPLEX CONTROLLED, ONE DUPLEX UNCONTROLLED). MOUNT AT 18"AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, UON FLOOR MOUNTED POWER OUTLET. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND TYPE. 125V, 20A FLOOR MOUNTED POWER QUADRUPLEX OUTLET. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND TYPE. 125V, 20A COMBINATION POWER, TELE/DATA & AUDIO VISUAL FLUSH FLOOR MOUNTED HALF CONTROLLED QUADRUPLEX OUTLET. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND TYPE. 125V. 20A

COMBINATION POWER, TELE/DATA & AUDIO VISUAL FLUSH FLOOR MOUNTED SPLIT WIRED DUPLEX OUTLET. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND TYPE. 125V. 20A QUADRIPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A MOUNT AT 18"AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, TYP. UON DUPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A, MOUNT AT 18"AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, TYP. UON CONTROL SWITCH, SUBSCRIPT(S) INDICATES ASSOCIATED LIGHT FIXTURE(S) / EQUIPMENT CONTROLLED. NO SUBSCRIPT INDICATES ALL LIGHT FIXTURE(S) / EQUIPMENT CONTROLLED INSIDE ROOM. MOUNT AT +42" AFF, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. = GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER

RECEPTACLE SUBSCRIPT LEGEND
BELL

PUSHBUTTON

ADA DOOR PUSHPAD
SINGLEPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A, MOUNT AT 18"AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, TYP. UON COMBINATION 120V/USB DUPLEX RECEPTACLE
CONTROLLED DUPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A, TOP HALF SWITCHED VIA OCCUPANCY SENSOR OR VIA TIME SWITCH IN OPEN OFFICES. (PLUG LOAD CONTROL) MOUNT AT 18"AFF TO

CENTER OF OUTLET, UON
FLUSH FLOOR MOUNTED POWER OUTLET. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND TYPE. 125V, 20A SPECIAL PURPOSE RECEPTACLE OUTLET: RATING AS INDICATED

POWER/TELECOM WIREMOLD SURFACE RACEWAY, LENGTH APPROXIMATELY AS SHOWN aK3O
V
3a
S

UBSCRIPT(S) INDICATES SWITCH CONTROL

NUMBER INDICATES CIRCUIT NUMBER

LIGHTING FIXTURE LINEAR, LENGTH AS SHOWN, CEILING MOUNTED

LIGHTING FIXTURE, LENGTH AS SHOWN, WALL MOUNTED
EM EM
OR
DATA OUTLET AT CEILING, PROVIDE SINGLE-GANG BOX/SINGLE GANG MUD RING/STRING WITH 1" C DATA OUTLET, MOUNT AT 18" AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, TYP. UON, PROVIDE DOUBLE-GANG BOX/SINGLE EXTENDED GANG MUDRING/STRINGS WITH 1"C TO ABOVE ACCESSIBLE CEILING SPACE. TELEPHONE OUTLET, "W" INDICATES WALL PHONE, MOUNT AT 45" AFF TO TOP OF OUTLET, UON, PROVIDE SINGLE-GANG BOX/SINGLE-GANG MUD-RING/STRING WITH 1"C TO ABOVE ACCESSIBLE CEILING SPACE.

TELEVISION OUTLET, MOUNT AT 18" AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, PROVIDE SINGLE-GANG BOX WITH 1"C TO ABOVE ACCESSIBLE CEILING SPACE.

EXIT SIGN, WALL MOUNTED
SHADING = ILLUMINATED

FACE ARROWS AS SHOWN
EXIT SIGN, LOW LEVEL, RECESSED IN WALL SHADING = ILLUMINATED FACE ARROWS AS SHOWN OCCUPANCY SENSOR, WALL MOUNTED. DUAL OR SINGLE RELAY PER PLANS. SUBSCRIPT(S) INDICATES FIXTURE(S) CONTROLLED.

EXIT SIGN, CEILING MOUNTED
P = PENDANT MOUNTED
SHADING = ILLUMINATED FACE ARROWS AS SHOWN

EXIT SIGN, CEILING MOUNTED
P = PENDANT MOUNTED
SHADING = ILLUMINATED FACE ARROWS AS SHOWN
CONTROL PANEL SURFACE MOUNTED EXAMPLES: LCP, SECURITY, BMS CONTROL PANEL RECESSED MOUNTED EXAMPLES: LCP, SECURITY, BMS MS = MOTORIZED SHADE CONTROLLER (FBO) PS = PROJECTION SCREEN CONTROLLER (FBO) xxT

J INTEGRATED LUMINAIRE OCCUPANCY SENSOR AND CONTROL UNIT FOR WIRELESS LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM. HB = HIGH BAY TYPE. GATEWAY CONTROLLER FOR WIRELESS CONNECTIVITY.

PLUG LOAD CONTROLLER FOR POWER RECEPTACLES.

ABOVE COUNTER

ANNUNCIATOR

AMMETER
AMPERE

ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR

APPROXIMATELY

ARCHITECTURAL AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH

AUTOMATIC

BUILDING

CLOCK OR CONDUIT CABINET CAPACITOR

CATALOG

CIRCUIT BREAKER

CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION

CURRENT LIMITING FUSE CEILING

CIRCUIT COMBINATION

CONCRETE CONNECTION

CONTACTOR

CONTRACTOR

CURRENT TRANSFORMER

DECIBEL DIRECT CURRENT DETAIL DIAMETER

DIAGRAM

DIMENSION

DISCONNECT DISTRIBUTION

DIVISION

DAMPER MOTOR
DOWN

DOUBLE POLE DOUBLE THROW

DOUBLE POLE SINGLE THROW

DRAWING
EACH

ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR

ELECTRICAL ELEVATION

EMERGENCY

ENCLOSURE

EQUIPMENT ELECTRIC WATER COOLER

ELECTRIC WATER HEATER

EXISTING

EXPOSED

FIRE ALARM

FOOTCANDLE

FIXTURE
FIGURE
FLOOR

FULL LOAD AMPERE

FLEXIBLE

FLUORESCENT

FOOT OR FEET

FUTURE GENERATOR GROUND FAULT

HEIGHT HIGH INTENSITY DISCHARGE HORIZONTAL HORSEPOWER
HEATER

HEATING, VENTILATION

HIGH VOLTAGE HERTZ

IMPEDANCE

INCH OR INCHES

JUNCTION BOX

KILOVOLT KILOVOLT - AMPERE

KILOWATT

LIGHTING MAXIMUM

MOTOR CONTROL CENTER MOTOR CIRCUIT PROTECTOR MECHANICAL MOUNTED

NEUTRAL NORMALLY CLOSED
NUMBER

NORMALLY OPEN

NOMINAL NAMEPLATE NOT TO SCALE
+6" OVERCOUNTER OR BACKSPLASH OUTSIDE DIAMETER OVERLOAD POLE

PUBLIC ADDRESS
PULL BOX or PUSHBUTTON

POWER FACTOR
PHASE

PILOT LIGHT PANEL PAIR

PRIMARY
POLYVINYL CHLORIDE RECESSED or RECEPTACLE REFERENCE REGULATOR

REQUIRED

REVISION
ROOM

SCHEDULE

SMOKE DETECTOR
SECONDARY or SECURITY

SOLID NEUTRAL SOLENOID
SPARE
SPACE

SINGLE POLE DOUBLE THROW

SINGLE POLE SINGLE THROW

SPECIFICATION

SUPERVISORY

SQUARE FOOT STATION

STANDARD

SUSPENDED
SWITCH

SWITCHBOARD

SWITCHGEAR

SYNCHRONIZATION
SYSTEM

TELEPHONE

TEMPERATURE

THERMAL OVERLOAD

TWISTED PAIR SHIELDED

EXPLOSION PROOF

TELEPHONE TERMINAL CABINET

TELEVISION

TYPICAL UNIT HEATER

UNIT VENTILATOR

VOLT VOLT AMPERE

VERTICAL VESTIBULE

VOLTMETER

VOLUME WATT WEATHER PROOF
AC
ANN
AM

A OR AMP

AFF APPROX
ARCH
ATS
AUTO
BLDG C

CAB CAP CAT CBCCTV CLF CLG

CKT COMB CONC
CONN

CONT CONTR
CTDBDC

DET DIA DIAG
DIM
DISC

DIST DIV DM
DN

DPDT DPST DWG
EA
EC

ELECT ELEM

ENCL EQUIP
EWC
EWH
(E) EXP
FA
FC
FIXT
FIG
FLFLA
FLEX
FLUOR
FT

FUT GEN GFI

HGT HID

HORIZ HPHTR
HVAC
HVHZ
IMP
IN
JB
KV
KVA
KW

LTG MAX MCC MCP MECH MTD

NEUT NC
No NO
NOM

NPNTS OCODOL P
PA
PB
PFPH

PLPNL PR

PRI PVC
REC

REF REG
REQD
REV RM
SCHED
SD
SEC
SN
SOL SP
SPC

SPDT SPST SPEC
SUPV
SQ.FT. STA
STD
SUSP
SW
SWBD
SWGR
SYNC
SYST
T or TEL TEMP

TOL TPS
XP
TTC
TV
(TYP.) UH
UVV
VA

VERT VEST VM
VOL W
WP

AUXILIARY

AUDIO VISUAL
AUX
AV

AND AIR CONDITIONING

MTG MOUNTING

NIC NOT IN CONTRACT

VR VERMIN RESISTANT

CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER

RR REMOVE AND REINSTALL

XFMR TRANSFORMER

AFCI ARC FAULT CURRENT INTERUPT

AIC AMPERES INTERRUPTING CAPACITY

DZP DAYLIGHTING ZONE PRIMARY DZS DAYLIGHTING ZONE SECONDARY

SZ DAYLIGHTING ZONE SKYLIGHT
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000

C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001

G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
PEF
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:32:54 PM
E0.01
05/25/2022
1927400

LEGEND, SYMBOLS, GENERAL NOTES &

DRAWING LIST

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP

KB / SA

SA / AK

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2

MITHUN -
p 0 []
9 @
=
2 ~
y = ~
~ (::.ill
jt n = ~
1 ~ ---
~
" o--() 0-0--0
. ~
.....3 . =- ~
..., -=O
""" ----
0 □ ' D' • i ' IZI'
== i IZI +- $ ' ID' $ -BIi
$ -BIi D'
$
- Q I
I ~ □
□
0 $
0 El l:l) 0 I
0 i:::::,
□ IY
oo
@ ~ -■■-
~ TT
:I' ®
:I' _,....._~
I;! -"--rr=,..-
-<<-~-»-
-<<~>-
□
8)
--0
= -----, I--
-----#-
~
~ I
Luminaire Schedule
Scene: Site
Qty Tag Label Lum. Lumens LLF Lum. Watts
6 ZW1 24370_BEGA_IES 421 10
16 ZR1B 24817_BEGA_IES 1239 0.850 10
4 ZS1 svpg-266l-1200-nw-g2-5 7038 51.9
5 ZY1 LN450-2LVC-WW-T3 5126 71.99
2 ZR1A 24823_BEGA_IES 1218 10
10 ZS2 LN950___Std-Output-3000K 568 0.850 16
7 ZR2 24212K3_BEGA_IES 1423 0.850 15
8 ZW2 24351K3_BEGA_IES 3250 0.850 26

0.850

0.850

0.850

0.850
Calculation Summary
Scene: Site
Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min
Garage Entrance Illuminance Fc 7.08 10.9 2.5 2.83 4.36
Main Entry Illuminance Fc 5.98 278.5 0.3 19.93 928.33
Parking Illuminance Fc 2.34 12.4 0.4 5.85 31.00
Pathway 1 Illuminance Fc 3.94 10.4 0.3 13.13 34.67
Pathway 2 Illuminance Fc 12.98 165.7 0.1 129.80 1657
Pathway 3 Illuminance Fc 24.00 29.2 18.7 1.28 1.56
Pathway 4 Illuminance Fc 7.95 27.6 2.5 3.18 11.04
Pathway 5 Illuminance Fc 2.01 5.9 0.1 20.10 59.00
Pathway 6 Illuminance Fc 3.63 4.5 3.0 1.21 1.50
Trash Shed Illuminance Fc 13.17 34.6 3.7 3.56 9.35

8.1 8.2 8.6 8.8 8.8 8.7

8.3 8.6 9.2 9.6 9.7 9.4 10.0 10.9 9.4 8.0 6.9

8.4 8.8 9.5 9.9 10.0 10.0 9.9 9.9 9.5 8.9 7.9 6.9 7.5 7.0

8.6 9.1 9.7 10.0 10.1 10.4 10.3 10.2 10.0 9.4 8.3 6.9 6.0 5.1 3.9 3.3 2.6

8.6 9.0 9.5 9.9 10.1 10.5 10.5 10.4 10.0 9.2 8.2 6.9 5.6 4.8 4.2 3.7 3.0

8.5 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.9 10.2 10.3 10.2 9.6 8.8 7.8 6.7 5.8 4.9 4.2 3.6

8.5 8.9 9.3 9.5 9.6 9.9 9.9 9.7 9.1 8.2 7.2 6.2 5.4 4.6 3.9 3.3

8.4 8.7 9.1 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.2 8.5 7.6 6.6 5.6 4.9 4.1 3.4 2.8

8.4 8.8 9.1 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.0 8.7 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.2 4.4 3.7 3.0

8.4 8.7 9.0 9.0 8.9 8.8 8.6 8.2 7.5 6.6 5.7 4.8 4.0 3.4 2.7

8.2 8.4 8.7 8.8 8.6 8.5 8.2 7.8 7.1 6.2 5.3 4.4 3.7 3.1 2.5

8.6 8.8 8.9 8.8 8.4 8.0 7.7 7.3 6.5 5.7 4.9 4.1 3.5 2.9

7.3 6.8 6.2 5.4 4.6 3.9 3.3 2.7

5.9 5.2 4.4 3.8 3.2

5.7 5.1 4.3 3.7 3.1

6.0 5.5 4.9 4.3 3.7 3.1

5.5 4.9 4.4 4.0 3.7

4.7 4.3 3.9 3.5 3.4

4.2 5.1 4.7 3.3

3.1 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4

0.5 0.6 0.4

0.3 0.3 0.6

0.3 0.6 0.6

0.3 0.6 0.5 0.6

0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6

0.6 0.4 0.4 0.5

0.4 0.5 0.6

0.3 0.4 0.6

5.7 6.7 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.7 5.6

8.0 9.3 9.5 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.0

8.7 10.0 10.4 10.6 10.6 9.9 8.6

7.4 8.8 8.8 9.2 9.1 9.6 8.6 4.8 18.4 25.0 14.2 5.5 14.1 24.9 19.2 6.0 6.0 19.2 24.6 13.0 2.8 1.3 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7

4.9 5.8 5.9 5.7 6.4 7.0 6.7 9.2 25.6 30.5 19.3 6.8 19.1 31.0 25.3 8.1 8.2 25.4 30.4 17.7 3.5 1.4 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.8

2.3 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.9 4.9 5.5 4.9 13.8 19.0 10.3 4.5 10.0 18.6 13.8 4.9 4.9 13.9 18.3 1.4 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.1

1.3 1.6 1.8 2.2 3.1 6.1 12.3 3.0 3.3 4.0 3.2 2.7 3.1 4.0 3.3 2.6 2.6 3.3 3.8 2.5 1.6 1.2 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.2

0.8 1.0 1.3 1.8 3.2 9.5 41.8 96.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5

0.7 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.8 9.0 34.9 6.6 0.9 1.1 3.8 2.2 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8

0.8 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.0 278.5 39.1 8.9 2.6 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.2 1.9 2.7 4.2

0.7 0.9 1.5 2.5 3.4 46.1 28.9 7.0 2.4 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.4 2.0 2.5 2.3 2.9

0.8 1.1 2.1 5.3 14.3 2.9 1.5 7.3 3.5 1.7 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.1 2.7 2.2

0.8 1.4 2.9 9.7 46.6 219.8 1.9 1.5 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.4 2.9 3.1 2.8

0.8 1.3 2.7 8.2 24.4 2.1 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.3

1.3 2.2 2.6 2.2 2.3 1.9 1.8 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.7 2.6

2.0 2.8 3.1 3.0 2.5 2.1 3.1 3.5 2.1 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.8 1.7 2.1 4.1

10.0 9.7 4.7 3.1 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.4 1.4 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.7

26.8 25.7 10.1 3.6 2.7 2.3 2.4 2.7 3.1 3.0 2.4 2.7 1.7 1.4

28.3 27.2 10.8 3.5 2.7 2.7 3.0 2.9 2.4 2.3 3.0 2.7 2.2

13.3 12.6 5.3 2.9 2.3 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.7 3.1 2.7

4.3 4.3 3.3 2.6 2.0 2.3 2.6 3.0 3.2 2.9 2.4 3.4 4.7

9.5 9.0 4.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.2 2.3 1.8 1.5

9.1 2.5 2.3 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.5

1.8 1.8 1.7 1.4

1.3 0.6 0.6

0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6

0.6 0.6

0.6 0.6

0.6 0.6

5.9 4.3 2.2 1.8 1.4

5.0 3.8 2.3 2.1 2.0

3.7 3.0 2.4 2.4 2.9

2.7 2.3 2.2 2.6 3.3

2.0 1.8 2.0 2.6 3.2

1.6 1.5 1.7 2.4 3.3

5.2 5.0 3.0 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.5 2.2 3.4

3.9 3.9 2.8 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.4 2.2 3.3

2.6 2.9 2.4 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.4 2.2 3.2

2.0 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.4 2.3 3.6

1.8 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.1 1.3 2.2 3.9 6.8 9.7 12.0

1.2 1.0 1.2 2.0 3.1 4.1 3.8 5.7

3.0 3.0 2.3 1.6 1.1 0.9 1.2 1.9 2.8 3.2 2.7 3.4

4.5 4.0 2.5 1.6 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.8 2.8 3.9 3.5 4.9

5.7 4.8 2.6 1.5 1.0 0.7 1.0 1.8 3.2 6.2 9.3 12.4

5.2 4.5 2.5 1.5 0.9 0.7 0.9 1.6 2.8 4.7 5.5 7.8 3.8 1.4

3.8 3.5 2.3 1.4 0.9 1.4 2.0 2.7 2.3 3.0 1.4

0.9 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.7 0.8

1.5 1.7 1.5 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.3 2.0 2.4

1.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.5 2.5 3.9 4.2 5.6

0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.5 2.9 5.6 8.6 11.1

0.7 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.4 2.2 3.3 3.2

1.0 1.4 1.3 1.2 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.6 1.9 1.5 1.8

1.0 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.9

2.5 3.0 2.3 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.7 1.1 1.4 1.6 1.3 1.4

3.9 4.2 2.9 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.7 2.5 3.3

5.0 5.2 3.2 1.5 1.1 0.7 0.9 1.6 2.7 4.9 7.0 9.1

4.6 4.8 3.1 1.5 1.1 0.8 1.0 1.7 2.8 4.7 5.9 7.5

3.2 3.7 2.7 1.6 0.8 1.1 1.7 2.5 5.1

1.1 0.9 1.1 1.8 2.5

1.3 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.8 3.0 4.2 4.1 6.0

0.9 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.8 3.4 6.2 9.3 11.7

0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.5 2.5 3.6 3.6 5.5

0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.6 1.8 2.1

1.1 1.4 1.3 1.2 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9

1.0 0.7 0.7

2.6 3.1 2.4 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.9

4.0 4.3 2.9 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.3 2.0 2.9

5.0 5.3 3.2 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.9 1.6 2.9 4.6 5.3 7.7

4.5 4.7 3.0 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.9 1.7 3.3 5.9 8.4 10.8

3.1 3.5 2.6 1.5 1.0 0.8 1.4 2.2 3.0 2.7 4.3

0.9 0.3

0.4 0.5 0.6

1.0 0.9 0.8

1.3 1.2 1.2

1.6 1.7 1.6

2.0 2.1 2.2

2.5 2.7 2.9

3.0 3.5 3.8

3.7 4.4 5.0

4.2 5.2 6.2

4.4 5.4 6.5

4.2 5.0 5.7

4.0 4.5 4.8

3.9 4.3 4.5

3.9 4.3 4.4

3.9 4.3 4.5

4.1 4.6 5.0

4.4 5.1 5.9

4.6 5.6 6.7

4.5 5.5 6.6

4.2 7.1 8.1 7.5 3.3 2.6

3.9 4.3 4.6 5.1 5.8 5.0 1.9 5.6

3.8 4.0 4.1 3.9 3.7 3.8 4.5 3.3 1.0 1.1 9.7

3.8 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.6 3.9 4.5 3.9 2.3 0.7 0.9 10.4

4.0 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.7 4.2 5.0 3.8 1.9 6.5

0.2 0.1

0.4 0.1

0.3 0.2

23.8 24.8 6.9 0.9 0.7 1.2 2.2 3.5 1.0 0.8 1.5 4.3 9.2 9.2 4.3 1.2

98.1 112.2 0.8 1.2 2.1 4.8 15.9 30.1 0.7 0.8 29.1 10.4 3.2 1.6 1.1 0.9 5.6 38.4 40.7 5.8

1.3 1.8 2.8 6.1 26.3 165.7 21.2 71.5 14.0 4.2 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.3 23.4 41.1

1.9 3.4 4.5 5.8 12.5 6.1 3.1 3.5 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.9 15.0 9.2 4.4 3.1 3.2 3.6 2.4 1.4

4.3 14.3 17.3 9.1 4.8 5.1 14.5 17.3 8.1 3.3 4.5 13.0 17.3 10.5 4.3 4.6 12.6 17.6 9.3 2.4 1.2

8.5 29.7 15.9 4.6 9.9 27.5 30.5 16.6 4.7 8.0 24.9 30.0 17.8 4.9 7.1 23.9 30.4 19.0 3.8 1.3

8.3 23.2 26.6 13.3 4.6 6.3 19.5 24.5 13.4 4.0

6.5 17.5 21.1 9.7 4.1

9.5 27.1 30.5 16.1 3.6

7.4 23.1 26.6 12.8 2.9

29.2 20.1

28.0 18.7

22.0 23.8 6.9

10.8 3.8

3.9 2.8

8.0 3.4

21.9 6.1

24.0 7.0

11.1 4.0

4.1 3.1

6.6 3.6

20.4 6.0

25.6 8.1

14.6 5.6

5.9 4.8

8.3 5.7

22.4 8.4 5.3

27.6 10.4 5.5 4.6 4.3 4.0

5.5 6.5 5.3 4.5 4.9

6.0 4.8 5.0 4.8 4.1

4.3 4.3 4.6 4.7 3.4 2.8

7.1 4.0 2.7 2.7

0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1

2.6 4.6 5.9 4.2 2.6 2.3 3.6 5.6 5.2 3.0 1.3

3.4 3.0 4.5

13.7 15.6 11.0 8.6 8.0 7.3

28.6 32.6 19.3 9.1 7.7 7.1 6.5

30.8 34.6 20.9 9.0 7.5 6.8

17.0 19.9 12.1 7.8 7.0 6.4

8.1 8.7 7.6 6.9 6.3 5.7

11.4 13.1 8.5 6.0 5.1

25.4 29.3 16.0 5.7 4.2

27.5 31.3 17.3 5.2

13.2 16.0 8.1 3.7
PATHWAY 1
PATHWAY 2
PATHWAY 4
PATHWAY 5
PATHWAY 3

MAIN ENTRY

GARAGE ENTRANCE

TRASH SHED
CIVIC CENTER DR.

EV
EV
VAN
NO

PARKING
EV

PROJECT NORTH
CIVIC CENTER DR.

LINCOLN
ST.
5 STORY APARTMENTS
5 STORY APARTMENTS

SETBACK
LEVEL-2 COURTYARD
(E) TRANSFORMER
(N) TRANSFORMER
S.J.T.D, S.E.D.
(E) WOOD FENCE O/ 2-3' RETAINING WALL
(E) FENCE
(N) DRIVEWAY FOR PARKING ACCESS

ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE

PRIMARY ENTRY

FOURCOURT
1651 TRITON CT
1661 TRITON CT
1671 TRITON CT
1681 TRITON CT
1691 TRITON CT
1700 LINCOLN ST
1701 TRITON CT
(N) LANDSCAPE WALL, S.L.D.
(E) CHAIN LINK FENCE
EE
T
G
FH
(N) SIDEWALK
(N) STREET EASEMENT
(E) R.O.W.
(N) WATER AND FIRE , SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS

STAIR ACCESS TO ROOF
(N) IRRIGATION SERVICE WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTER, S.C.D.

STAIR ACCESS TO ROOF
(N) DRIVEWAY FOR GARAGE PARKING ACCESS, S.C.D.
(N) DEDICATED PATH FOR TRASH PUSH AND PULL SERVICES
SEE NOTES BELOW FOR TRASH SERVICES.

FH
FH

TRASH STAGING AREA
(N) NEW FENCE AND GATE, S.L.D.

LINCOLN ST.

CIVIC CENTER DR.

ZR1A
ZR1B
ZR2
ZR2
ZS2
ZS2
ZS2
ZS2
ZY1
ZY1
ZY1
ZY1
ZY1
ZW2
ZW2
ZW1
ZW2
ZW2
ZW2
ZW2
ZR1B
ZW2
ZW1
ZW2
ZW1 ZW1
ZR1B
ZR1B
ZR1B
ZR1B ZR1B ZR1B ZR1B
ZR2 ZR2 ZR2
ZR1B
ZR1A
ZR1B ZR1B
ZS2
ZS2
ZR1B
ZS2
ZS2
ZR1B
ZR1B
ZR1B
ZR1B
ZS1
ZS1
ZS1
ZS1
ZR1B
ZR1B
ZR2ZR2
ZS2
ZS2
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000

C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001

G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
P
E
F
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:33:04 PM
E1.01
05/25/2022
1927400

SITE PLAN - LIGHTING

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP

KB / SA

SA / AK

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1 1/16" = 1'-0" SITE PLAN - LIGHTING
1 SHEET NOTES: GENERAL NOTES:

1. +++++
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
r
I
L
~
0 MITHUN
0 ~
Calculation Summary
Scene: Podium
Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min
Podium Walkway Illuminance Fc 12.84 120.6 0.1 128.40 1206 Path of Travel Illuminance Fc 17.00 120.6 1.0 17.00 120.60 Luminaire Schedule
Scene: Podium
Qty Tag Label Lum. Lumens LLF Lum. Watts
3 ZR1B 24817_BEGA_IES 1239 0.850 10
5 ZW3 24502_BEGA_IES 1217 0.850 17
23 ZR2 24212K3_BEGA_IES 1423 0.850 15

0.2 0.2

0.5 0.5 0.1

0.1 0.2 0.6 0.2

0.2 0.2

17.2 3.4 89.3 2.9 2.7 31.9 12.5

9.9 87.3 1.8 5.1 1.5 1.7 4.5

3.4 9.0 10.0 43.9 1.5 68.8 26.0 6.4 31.0 2.9 1.0

42.0 6.2 4.5 6.3 10.5 23.1 10.9 120.6 2.9 54.8 48.8 2.5 4.5 56.4 10.4 15.8 8.1 6.2 6.5 1.8 2.1 1.4

8.1 4.6 2.1 1.8 2.2 3.3 4.6 11.8 8.9 55.8 1.5 3.5 1.7 2.0 3.5 2.0 10.4 15.6 18.1 5.6 6.6 16.7 7.5 8.2 2.1 2.6 13.1 7.3

42.2 1.5 1.0 2.6 3.7 1.4 2.0 35.7 1.1 82.2 9.6 27.5 6.0 3.6 5.2 3.1 12.7 25.1 2.3 6.8 28.6 9.3 58.4 2.8 1.2 23.6 10.9

7.0 1.3 0.7 3.3 2.7 5.4 4.4 3.5 3.2 4.7 21.5 1.0

39.7 4.3 1.2 1.3 2.0 7.6 8.9 3.3

8.2 3.8 1.1 6.9

37.4 4.3

9.4 3.8

35.2 4.2 1.0

0.7 PATH OF TRAVEL

PROJECT NORTH
A
224
SBR-A
212
3BR-B_3
207
2BR-B
205
3BR-B
201
2BR-B
203
SBR-A
209
SBR-A
211
3BR-B_2
220
2BR-B
226
2BR-B
214
1BR-A
219
3BR-A
216
1BR-A
218
1BR-A
206
3BR-B
202
2BR-B
208
SBR-A
STAIR 2
B
C
F
G
H
I
1 2 3 4 5 5.3 5.5 6 6.4 7 8 9
ELEC. CLOSET

ELECTRICAL CLOSET
200D
222
2BR-B
204
SBR-A
221
3BR-B
223
1BR-A
STAIR 1
213
3BR-C
CL.
225
SBR-A
210
1BR-C
215
1BR-B
217
1BR-B
CTYD

COURTYARD
C2A

CORRIDOR SOUTH
C2B

CORRIDOR NORTH

STORAGE
200B
TRASH
200E
STOR
200A
ELEC. CLOSET

JANITOR
ZR1B
ZR1B ZW3
ZW3
ZR1B
ZW3 ZW3
ZW3
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2 ZR2 ZR2 ZR2 ZR2 ZR2 ZR2
ZR2 ZR2 ZR2
ZR2
ZR2 ZR2 ZR2 ZR2 ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000

C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001

G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
P
E
F
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:33:23 PM
E1.02
05/25/2022
1927400

PODIIUM LEVEL FLOOR

PLAN - LIGHTING

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP

KB / SA

SA / AK

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1 1/16" = 1'-0" PODIUM LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - LIGHTING
1 SHEET NOTES: GENERAL NOTES:

1. +++++
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
----------------------- -- ----- MITHUN
0 \
\
\
\
\_
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
I
~
EV
EV
VAN
NO

PARKING
EV
CIVIC CENTER DR.

LINCOLN ST.
5 STORY APARTMENTS
5 STORY APARTMENTS

SETBACK
LEVEL-2 COURTYARD
(E) TRANSFORMER
(N) TRANSFORMER
S.J.T.D, S.E.D.
(E) WOOD FENCE O/ 2-3' RETAINING WALL
(E) FENCE
(N) DRIVEWAY FOR PARKING ACCESS

ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE

PRIMARY ENTRY

FOURCOURT
1651 TRITON CT
1661 TRITON CT
1671 TRITON CT
1681 TRITON CT
1691 TRITON CT
1700 LINCOLN ST
1701 TRITON CT
(N) LANDSCAPE WALL, S.L.D.
(E) CHAIN LINK FENCE
EE
T
G
FH
(N) SIDEWALK
(N) STREET EASEMENT(E) R.O.W.
(N) WATER AND FIRE , SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS

STAIR ACCESS TO ROOF
(N) IRRIGATION SERVICE WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTER, S.C.D.

STAIR ACCESS TO ROOF
(N) DRIVEWAY FOR GARAGE PARKING ACCESS, S.C.D.
(N) DEDICATED PATH FOR TRASH PUSH AND PULL SERVICES
SEE NOTES BELOW FOR TRASH SERVICES.

FH
FH

TRASH STAGING AREA
(N) NEW FENCE AND GATE, S.L.D. 1 2 3 4 5 5.35.5 6 6.4 7 8 9 IHGFCBA LINCOLN ST.

CIVIC CENTER DR.
(PROPOSED) UNDERGROUND UTILITY SVC.

MAIN SVC. SWITCHGEAR
(GROUND FLOOR)
(NEW) UTILITY TRANSFORMER. PAD AND
INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SVP REQUIREMENTS.

TO SVP POINT OF CONNECTION TO BE DETERMINED.
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000

C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001

G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
PEF
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:33:37 PM
E1.03
05/25/2022
1927400

SITE PLAN - POWER

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP

KB / SA

SA / AK

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2 1 1" = 20'-0" SITE PLAN - POWER 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
I
'.y f
\:'~-
MITHUN
~
GFCI
GFCI

GFCI GFCI
GFCI

GFCI GFCI GFCI
GFCI

GFCI GFCI GFCI
GFCI

GFCI GFCI GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
JJJJ
GFCI
JJJJ

PROJECT NORTH
ABCFGHI 1 2 3 4 5 5.3 5.5 6 6.4 7 8 9

FIRE PUMP
(75 HP)
2BR-A
112

COMMUNITY RM
105
LOBBY
L1

PARKING
P1

FIRE PUMP
118
STAIR 2 ST2.1
AP AP
E4.02 5

FIRE PUMP SWITCHBRD SECTION
TRASH
101

STORAGE
102A
DWH
117

ELEC RM
116

MPOE /TEL
115
2BR-A
114
SBR-D
113
STAIR 1 ST1.1

CORRIDOR
SOUTH
C1A
3BR-D
111
OFFICE
106A

TENANT SERVICES
106C

SERVER & COPY
106B
PANTRY
105B STOR.
105A

LAUNDRY
104

BIKE RM
103
E4.01 6 E4.05 4
ELEV. CTRL. JAN. 107
108
EERC
110
RR
109
ELEVATOR 2 E2
ELEVATOR 1 E1
STOR.

L1A

STORAGE
119

HEAT RM
120
MSB-1
APARTMENT METERING EQUIP. TYPICAL.

E7.01 1
VRFFC 2
FC
EERC
HP
ELEV
HP
EERC
??
HP

LAUNDRY
FC

LAUNDRY

EF BIKE
H1 P1
MTG RM
106D
14-30R
14-30R

EV CHARGING

EV CHARGING

EV CHARGING
EV CHARGING 1-1/2" C. TO EACH EV CHARGING STATION. TYPICAL.

WP
HP
FP
FC
ELEC-1
FC
ELEC-2

FC MPOE

HP MSHOP
DWH
FC
ELEV
WPGFCI

ELEC BIKE CHARGERS
LCP
LTG. INVERTER
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000

C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001

G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
PEF
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:33:53 PM
E3.01
05/25/2022
1927400
LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - GROUND - POWER

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP

KB / SA

SA / AK

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1 05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2

1. +++++ 1 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - GROUND - POWER 1 GENERAL NOTES:

SHEET NOTES:

1. +++++
MITHUN - 1
0 d
-Cl- ~ --
- 0-
□ □
jT
\ j':~ ., I i
I C:::J
\ I n---- ~ -J ---A
□
□
[
□
! ~
□ □
.L
~
-- /
- ElllE:l'll';'I-
~
- - - - -. -- --'-----------' / /
T
N G
M
LOAD
800A
3P M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
800A
3P M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
800A
3P M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
800A
3P M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
800A
3P M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
1 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM
N.T.S.

LSIG
TAP (TYP.)
UEP
125A UEP125A
UEP
125A
UEP
125A
UEP
125A
LEVEL 4 ( RESIDENTIAL)
225A
3P

HOUSE-EM
LEVEL 3 ( RESIDENTIAL)
225NG

SOURCE CIRCUIT RATING SUBSCRIPT

EXAMPLES
225 NG
60 1/0
50 1
125
250
40 2
100
250
30 4
90 4/0
20 8
80 2/0 3/0
70 10
15 CIRCUIT RATING

CONDUCTOR SIZE

SINGLE NEUTRAL

SINGLE NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR SIZE
RATING

CIRCUIT
* SINGLE NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR SIZES FOR CIRCUIT RATING 125 AND LESS G 3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, 1 GROUNDING CONDUCTOR
2 8@4
2@3
7@4
2@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
2@4
[email protected]
5@4
6@4
3@4

2.5 2.5

2.5 3.5
[email protected]
3 4
3 2

0.5 0.75

1.5 1.25

1.5 0.5
2 2
2 1
NNG
3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, 2 NEUTRAL CONDUCTORS*, 1 GROUNDING CONDUCTOR NNG IG
12 12
GND/
12 10
10 10
12 10
6 8
8 8
8 8
4 2
2 1
4 10
6 6
6 6
1 4
4 2
2 4
1 1
1/0
1/0
3/0
250
350
4/0
2/0
2 400
1 6

N NG NNGI

CONDUIT SIZE (INCHES) NGI
1 0.5

1.25 0.75
1 2
2 2

1.5 2

2.5 2

1.5 0.5

0.5 1

0.5 0.5
1 0.75

1.5 1.5
2 1.25

1.25 1.5

1.25 1.25

1.25 1.25

0.5 1.5

1.25 1.5

0.75 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NONE G
15 RATING

CIRCUIT

0.5 0.5
1 0.75

0.5 0.5
1 0.75

1.25 1.25

1.25 1.5
1 1.25

1.25 1.25
1 1.25
20 30
50 40
70 80
90 100
60 0.5 0.5

WIRING SCHEDULE - COPPER CONDUCTORS
2 2.5
3 2.5

2.5 3
4 5
2@3

3.5 4
3 3
2 2
2 2.5

1.5 2
2 2
3 3.5
4 2.5
3 3.5
2@2 [email protected]

2.5 2.5
[email protected]

3.5 2.5

2.5 2.5
2@5
[email protected]
2@4
[email protected]
6@5
5@4
4@4
7@4
3@4
2@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
3@3
2@4
3@3
[email protected]
2@3
5@3
4@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
6@4
[email protected]
[email protected]
7@4
3@3 [email protected] 3@4
6@4
5@4
[email protected]
2@4
[email protected]
[email protected]
2@3
7@4
[email protected] [email protected] 2@3 2@3
2 1.5
2 2

1.25 1.5

1.5 2
3 2.5

3.5 2@2

2.5 2.5
3 2@2
2 2.5
125
150
175
200
250
300
350
400
225
2@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
3@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
2@3
5@3
4@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
5@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
3@3 3@3
600
500
700
800
1600
1200
2000
2500
1000
450 2@2 [email protected]
[email protected] 8@4 8@4

CONDUCTORS PER CONDUIT
3000 [email protected] [email protected] 8@4
NONE
N

SUBSCRIPT
1 GROUNDING CONDUCTOR NG
NGI
NNGI

SUBSCRIPT KEY
3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, CONDUIT GROUND
1 GROUNDING CONDUCTOR, 1 ISOLATED GROUNDING CONDUCTOR
1 GROUNDING CONDUCTOR, 1 ISOLATED GROUNDING CONDUCTOR 110 1.25 1.5 1.5 2 2 2.5 4/0
400
500
400
350
500
300
350
250
500
3/0
250
350
2/0
4/0
3/0
1/0
PHASE/* NEUTRAL
500
3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, 1 NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR, CONDUIT GROUND 3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, 1 NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR,
3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, 1 NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR,
3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, 2 NEUTRAL CONDUCTORS*,
500

1.25 TAG
015
020
030
050
040
070
080
090
100
060
125
150
175
200
250
300
350
400
225
600
500
700
800
1600
1200
2000
2500
1000
450
3000
110
LEVEL 5 ( RESIDENTIAL)
LEVEL 2 ( RESIDENTIAL)
LEVEL 1 ( RESIDENTIAL)
PANEL-'H5SE'
225A
3P

HOUSE-EM
PANEL-'H5NE'
225A
3P
HOUSE
PANEL-'H1'
M
1000A
3PM
225A
3P
400A
3P

PARKING
PANEL-'P1'
225A
3P
2-3'' C FOR FUTURE PV
400A
3P
LSIG M
ROOF
400A
3P
SPARE
PANEL-'EM1'
800A
3P
SPARE

FIRE PUMP
(75 HP)
CTRL
EM. LOADS
FP DISC. 800A
EM. INVERTER
SVP

SERVICE

TRANSFORMER
MAIN SWITCHBOARD #2 "MSB1" 1000A, 208/120V, 3Ø, 4W, 100 KAIC

BONDING
JUMPER
125A/2P UTILITY METER (TYP.)
125A/2P-M.C.B.
(TYP. OF 10)
125A/2P UTILITY METER (TYP.)
125A/2P-M.C.B.
(TYP. OF 10)
125A/2P UTILITY METER (TYP.)
125A/2P-M.C.B.
(TYP. OF 10)
125A/2P UTILITY METER (TYP.)
125A/2P-M.C.B.
(TYP. OF 10)
125A/2P UTILITY METER (TYP.)
125A/2P-M.C.B.
(TYP. OF 10)
225A
3P
HOUSE
PANEL-'H5S'
225A
3P
HOUSE
PANEL-'H5N'
EM. INVERTER
50KW
EM. INVERTER
50KW

TYPICAL TYPICAL

TYPICAL TYPICAL

M M M M M M M
NEW (8)4" UG COUNDUIT
(3000A SERVICE)
208V, 3PH
4 WIRE, 65KAIC
208V, 3PH
4 WIRE, 65KAIC
208V, 3PH
4 WIRE, 65KAIC
208V, 3PH
4 WIRE, 65KAIC
208V, 3PH
4 WIRE, 65KAIC

TYPICAL
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000

C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001

G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
P
E
F
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:34:06 PM
E5.01
05/25/2022
1927400

SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP

KB / SA

SA / AK

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
----------------- - - ---- MITHUN -
G-4J
r - I
I
I
: : I I I I _t__J~:,_~~?-~===~=:--:::r~ L __ _J •--- -~-~-~-~- ~-~-~-
~i
I

PLUMBING GENERAL NOTES

MP COMPONENT ANCHORAGE NOTES

DOMESTIC WATER AND DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS

PIPING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BRACING NOTE

PIPING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS SHALL BE BRACED TO

COMPLY WITH THE FORCES AND DISPLACEMENT PRESCRIBED
IN ASCE-7-10 SECTION 13.3 AS DEFINED IN ASCE-7-10 SECTION

13.6.5.6, 13.6.7, 13.6.8 AND 2016 CBC, SECTIONS 1616A.1.23, 1616A.1.24, 1616A.1.25, 1616A.1.26 AND 1705A13.3. THE METHOD OF SHOWING BRACING AND ATTACHMENTS TO THE

STRUCTURE FOR THE IDENTIFIED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ARE
AS NOTED BELOW. WHEN BRACING AND ATTACHMENTS ARE
BASED ON A PREAPPROVED INSTALLATION GUIDE (E.G., SMACNA OR OSHPD OPM), COPIES OF THE BRACING SYSTEM

INSTALLATION GUIDE OR MANUAL SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON
THE JOBSITE PRIOR TO THE START OF AND DURING THE HANGING AND BRACING OF THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS. THE

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL VERIFY THE

ADEQUACY OF THE STRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THE HANGER
AND BRACE LOADS.

FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA
C
H
HWR
SS
SS
VW
SD
LOF
G
F
SP WSP
SHW
SHWR

DOMESTIC HOT WATER RETURN

SANITARY SEWER - BELOW FLOOR

PIPE UP - TEE & ELBOW

PIPE DOWN - TEE & ELBOW

DOMESTIC COLD WATER

DOMESTIC HOT WATER

SANITARY SEWER - EXPOSED

VENT WASTEPG

PRESSURE GAUGE

THERMOMETER

STORM DRAIN

LEADER (ARCHITECTURAL

OVERFLOW DRAIN
DOWNSPOUT, SEE ARCH. DWGS.)
UNION
FLANGE

PIPE ANCHOR

PIPE GUIDE

BACKFLOW PREVENTER

REDUCER

PETE'S PLUG

STRAINER

CLEANOUT

CAP OR PLUGGED FITTING

BJ BALL JOINT

FLEXIBLE CONNECTION
HB

ANGLE OR STOP CHECK VALVE

NEEDLE VALVE

BUTTERFLY VALVE

RELIEF VALVE

VALVE ASSEMBLY

SOLENOID VALVE

BALANCING VALVE

CONTROL VALVE, THREE WAY

CONTROL VALVE, TWO WAY

GAS COCK

CHECK VALVE

GLOBE VALVE

GATE VALVE

HOSE BIBB

BALL VALVE
FS

FD FLOOR DRAIN

FLOOR CLEANOUT

FLOOR SINK

RD ROOF DRAIN

OF OVERFLOW DRAIN

RR ROOF RECEPTOR

AREA DRAIN

NATURAL GAS

DIRECTION AND FLOW

FLOW METER

FLOW SWITCH

FLOW SWITCH/ SENSOR

PRESS SWITCH/ SENSOR

TEMP SWITCH/ SENSOR
FS
FS
PS
TS

PUMP - GENERIC
PUMP
FCO
AD
CO
BFP
BV
BLV
BFV
GV
GLV
PRV
FM

RPBP REDUCE PRESSURE

BACKFLOW PREVENTER
TH

GCO GRADE CLEANOUT
P-TRAP

WCO WALL CLEANOUT

PD PLANTER DRAIN

EQUIPMENT TAG

PLUMBING RISER TAG

SHEET NOTE TAG

EXPANSION JOINT EJ

POINT OF CONNECTION
CV

EQUIPMENT TAG CV

NEW WORK

EXISTING TO REMAIN

TO BE REMOVED

PRESSURE REDUCING
S

POINT OF CONNECTION
A(*) COMPRESSED AIR (*PSI WHERE REQUIRED) AD AREA DRAIN

AP ACCESS PANEL AV ACID VENT AVTR ACID VENT THRU ROOF AW ACID WASTE

BD BOILER BLOW DOWN

BF BOILER FEED

BFP BACKFLOW PREVENTER

BFV BUTTERFLY VALVE

BHP BRAKE / BOILER HORSEPOWER

BLV BALL VALVE

BT BATH TUB

BV BALANCING VALVE

BWV BACKWATER VALVE C DOMESTIC COLD WATER

CFF CAP FOR FUTURE CFH CUBIC FEET PER HOUR
CO2 CARBON DIOXIDE

CI CAST IRON

CLG CEILING

CO CLEANOUT

COND CONDENSER/CONDENSING/CONDENSATE CP CHROME PLATED

CPVC CHLORINATED POLYVINYL CHLORIDE CRP CONDENSATE RETURN PUMP CS DOMESTIC COLD WATER (SOFT) CSK CLINICAL SINK CTE CONNECT TO EXISTING

CV CONTROL VALVE CWR CONDENSER WATER RETURN

CWS CONDENSER WATER SUPPLY

DB DRY BULB TEMPERATURE DE DEIONIZED WATER

DF DRINKING FOUNTAIN

DI DISTILLED WATER

DN DOWN

DR DRAIN

DSP DRY STANDPIPE DT DRIP TRAP
(E) EXISTING

ET EXPANSION TANK

FHC FIRE HOSE CABINET

FIN FINISHED

FL FIRE LINE

FLG FLANGE

FLR FLOOR

FM FLOW METER

FO FUEL OIL

FOF FUEL OIL FILL

FOG FUEL OIL GAUGE

FOR FUEL OIL RETURN

PW PUMP WASTE

PTS PNEUMATIC TUBE SYSTEM

PSIG POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH GAUGE

PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH

PRV PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE

PR PUMP RETURN

PLBG PLUMBING

PIV POST INDICATOR VALVE

PG PRESSURE GAUGE

PFF PLUG FOR FUTURE

PD PUMP DISCHAGE/PRESSURE DROP

OV OUTLET VELOCITY

OSY OUTSIDE STEM AND YOKE

OD OUTSIDE DIMENSION

NW NON-POTABLE WATER

NTS NOT TO SCALE

NO NORMALLY OPEN

NFPA NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION

NC NORMALLY CLOSED
(N) NEW

LPG LIQUID PETROLEUM GAS

LPDT LOW PRESSURE DRIP TRAP

LP LOW PRESSURE

LAT LEAVING AIR TEMPERATURE/LATENT

LA LABORATORY COMPRESSED AIR
L

RAINWATER

IW INDIRECT WASTE

IRRW IRRIGATION WATER

IPS IRON PIPE SIZE

IFS IN FURRED SPACE

IE INVERT ELEVATION

ID INSIDE DIAMETER

HZ HERTZ

HWR DOMESTIC HOT WATER RETURN
AC

HV HEATING AND VENTILATING

HU HUMIDIFIER
H(*) DOMESTIC HOT WATER (*TEMP)

GV GATE VALVE

GR GRADE

GPH GALLONS PER HOUR

GCO GRADE CLEANOUT

GA GAUGE

FSK FLOOR SINK

FS FLOW SWITCH

FPM FEET PER MINUTE

FOV FUEL OIL VENT

FOS FUEL OIL SUPPLY

RD ROOF DRAIN

RIC ROUGH IN AND CONNECT RIO ROUGH IN ONLY

RPM REVOLUTIONS PER MINUTE RV RELIEF VENT/ROOF VENTILATOR

RVV RELIEF VALVE VENT

AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR

BLDG BUILDING

BMS BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

CD CONDENSATE DRAIN

CF CHEMICAL FEED

DWG DRAWING

FUT FUTURE

PCHR PRIMARY CHILLED WATER RETURN

PCHS PRIMARY CHILLED WATER SUPPLY

RPBP REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW

PREVENTER
L

CWV COMBINATION WASTE & VENT

FDR FIRE DAMPER

FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER

FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET

FH FIRE HYDRANT

ALL PLUMBING COMPONENTS SHALL BE ANCHORED AND INSTALLED PER THE DETAILS ON THE DSA APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. WHERE NO DETAIL IS INDICATED, THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS SHALL BE ANCHORED OR BRACED TO MEET THE FORCE AND DISPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS PRESCRIBED IN THE 2016 CBC, SECTIONS 1616A.1.17 THROUGH 1616A.1.26, 1705A 13.3 AND ASCE-7-10 CHAPTER 13, 26 AND 30.

1. ALL PERMANENT EQUIPMENT AND COMPONENTS. 2. TEMPORARY OR MOVABLE EQUIPMENT THAT IS

PERMANENTLY ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING UTILITY
SERVICES SUCH WATER. 3. MOVABLE EQUIPMENT WHICH IS STATIONED IN ONE PLACE FOR MORE THAN 8 HOURS AND HEAVIER THAN 400 POUNDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE ANCHORED WITH TEMPORARY ATTACHMENTS. THE FOLLOWING PLUMBING COMPONENTS SHALL BE

POSITIVELY ATTACHED TO THE STRUCTURE, BUT THE
ATTACHMENT NEED NOT BE DETAILED ON THE PLANS. THESE COMPONENTS SHALL HAVE FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONS

PROVIDED BETWEEN THE COMPONENT AND ASSOCIATED
PIPING. A. COMPONENTS WEIGHING LESS THAN 400 POUNDS AND HAVE A CENTER OF MASS LOCATED 4 FEET OR LESS
ABOVE THE ADJACENT FLOOR OR ROOF LEVEL THAT DIRECTLY SUPPORT THE COMPONENT. B. COMPONENTS WEIGHING LESS THAN 20 POUNDS, OR IN THE CASE OF DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, LESS THAN 5 POUNDS PER FOOT, WHICH ARE SUSPENDED FROM A ROOF OR FLOOR OR HUNG FROM A WALL. FOR THOSE ELEMENTS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE DETAILS ON

THE APPROVED DRAWINGS, THE INSTALLATION SHALL BE

SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
IN GENERAL RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DELEGATED RESPONSIBILITY AND THE DSA DISTRICT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. THE PROJECT

INSPECTOR WILL VERIFY THAT ALL COMPONENTS AND

EQUIPMENT HAVE BEEN ANCHORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS.

OPTION 1: DETAILED ON THE APPROVED DRAWINGS WITH PROJECT SPECIFIC NOTES AND DETAILS. OPTION 2: SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE OSHPD PRE-APPROVED DETAILS (CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT APPLICABLE OPM NUMBERS). OPM-0052-13 DATED 8/17/2017 PLUMBING PIPING (PP):

OPTION 3: WHERE ANCHORAGE, SUPPORT AND BRACING

ARE NOT FULLY DETAILED ON THE DRAWINGS AND

PRE-APPROVED SYSTEMS ARE NOT USED, CONTRACTOR

SHALL SUBMIT DESIGNS AND CALCULATIONS OF PROPOSED SYSTEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION SECTION 220548, PARAGRAPH 1.6.B.2.

PP
PP
X
X
PP X

1. ENTIRE INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2019 EDITION OF CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE AND BUILDING

CODE, ADOPTED EDITIONS OF NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION CODES, ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS, AND AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTIONS. 2. COORDINATE PLUMBING SYSTEMS WITH WORK OF OTHER TRADES PRIOR TO ANY FABRICATION OR INSTALLATION. PROVIDE ALL FITTINGS, OFFSETS, AND TRANSITIONS AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE WORKABLE INSTALLATION. 3. COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF ALL ROOF OPENINGS WITH

STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. 4. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH

THE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND
APPLICABLE CODES. PROVIDE ALL FITTINGS, TRANSITIONS, VALVES, AND OTHER DEVICES REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE WORKABLE INSTALLATION. 5. MAINTENANCE LABELS SHALL BE AFFIXED TO ALL PLUMBING

EQUIPMENT AND A MAINTENANCE MANUAL SHALL BE PROVIDED TO OWNER. 6. PIPES SHALL BE SUPPORTED AND BRACED PER 2019 CBC SECTION 1613A GUIDELINES FOR SEISMIC RESTRAINTS OF MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND PLUMBING PIPING SYSTEMS OF NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS. 7. HOUSEKEEPING PADS SHALL BE MINIMUM 4 INCHES HIGH WITH A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES CLEAR AROUND EQUIPMENT. 8. ALL CLEANOUTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 2019 EDITION. 9. VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL OFFSETS SHOWN IN PIPES INDICATE THE GENERAL RELATIONSHIP OF THE SYSTEMS. PROVIDE

ADDITIONAL OFFSETS SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN AS REQUIRED TO SUIT CONSTRUCTION AND WORK DONE BY TRADES. 10. DRAWINGS ARE ESSENTIALY DIAGRAMMATIC TO THE EXTENT THAT ALL OFFSETS, BENDS, SPECIAL FITTINGS AND EXACT LOCATIONS ARE NOT INDICATED. EXAMINE DRAWINGS AND PREMISES IN ORDER

TO DETERMINE BEST METHODS, EXACT LOCATIONS, ROUTES AND
BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS. INSTALL APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT IN ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS. 11. FOLLOW AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE LAYOUT INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. 12. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATIONS OF PLUMBING FIXTURES. 13. ALL PIPING IN FINISHED AREAS SHALL BE CONCEALED. EXPOSED

PIPING, WHERE NECESSARY, SHALL BE RUN AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE AND TIGHT TO THE WALLS.

14. LOCATIONS OF PIPING, FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT INDICATED ON DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY, AND SHALL BE CHANGED TO MEET THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS AS REQUIRED, AT NO EXTRA COST TO THE OWNER. 15. ALL PLUMBING FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL HAVE

ISOLATING VALVES, ACCESSIBLE SHUT-OFF VALVE ON ALL WATER SUPPLY LINES

16. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT ELEVATION OF UTILITIES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND PIPING. 17. INSTALL ALL VALVES, CONTROLS, ETC, IN ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS. PROVIDE ADEQUATELY SIZED ACCESS DOORS WHERE REQUIRED. 18. PLUMBING CONTRACTOR SHALL FILL FLOOR DRAINS WITH WATER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK AND TESTING. 19. INSULATE ALL WATER PIPING PER TITLE 24 REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 20. ABSOLUTE ACCURACY OF DRAWING AND SPECIFICATIONS CANNOT BE GUARANTEED. DESIGN DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE. WHILE EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO COORDINATE THE LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT, PIPING, ETC., WITH OTHER TRADES, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE EXACT REQUIREMENTS GOVERNED BY ACTUAL JOB CONDITIONS. 21. PENETRATION OF RATED ASSEMBLY SHALL BE FIRE-STOPPED. STOPPING SYSTEM (MATERIAL AND DESIGN) SHALL CONFORM TO BOTH FLAME (F) AND TEMPERATURE(T) RATING AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL BUILDING CODE AND AS TESTED BY NATIONALLY ACCEPTED TEST AGENCIES PER ASTM E814 OR REPRESENTABLE OF FIELD CONDITION. 22. COMBINE ALL VERTICAL VENTS WHERE PRACTICAL PRIOR TO ROOF PENETRATION. 23. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSTALL ALL WORK TO MEET OR EXCEED MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS STIPULATED IN CURRENT ISSUE OF APPLICABLE STANDARDS, CODES, OR REGULATIONS. 24. ALL PLUMBING WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH LEAD FREE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 116875 OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE. 25. INSTALL ALL PIPING TO AVOID ARCHITECTURAL FRAMING, STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION. COORDINATE PIPING LAYOUT WITH ALL OTHER CONTRACT DIVISIONS OF WORK BEFORE FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. 26. PROVIDE VALVED DRAINS AT THE LOW POINTS IN EACH PIPING SYSTEM.

FIRE MAIN

FIRE SPRINKLER WET STANDPIPE

SOLAR HOT WATER

SOLAR HOT WATER RETURN

CONDENSATE DRAIN

RISER DESIGNATION

COLD&HOT WATER

RISER DESIGNATION

SANITARY/VENT RISER DESIGNATION

STORM DRAIN

RISER DESIGNATION

FIRE STANDPIPE RISER DESIGNATION

ALTERNATE SHEET NOTE TAGS

KITCHEN

EQUIPMENT TAGS

SD SIGHT DRAIN

SH SHOWER

SK SINK

SM SHEET METAL SP FIRE SPRINKLER

SPD SPRINKLER DRAIN

ST STEAM TRAP

STD STANDARD

TD TRENCH DRAIN

TH THERMOMETER

V SANITARY VENT VTR VENT THRU ROOF

HB HOSE BIBB

AIR CONDITIONING

MBH THOUSAND BRITISH THERMAL

MA MEDICAL COMPRESSED AIR

LWT LEAVING WATER TEMPERATURE

UNITS PER HOUR MFR MANUFACTURER

LVG LEAVING

LV LAVATORY

LPS LOW PRESSURE STEAM

LPR LOW PRESSURE CD RETURN

LWCO LOW WATER CUT-OFF

EWT ENTERING WATER PRESSURE

FC FLEXIBLE CONNECTION

FCO FLOOR CLEANOUT

FD FLOOR DRAIN

FDC FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION

W WASTE WC WATER CLOSET WCO WALL CLEANOUT WT WEIGHT

VV VAPOR VENT
EQ
#
ABC
#
#
#
EQ-#
EQ-# EQ-#
CH
# SD
# CD
#
WV
#
F
#

DOMESTIC

PIPING & FITTINGS

DRAINS & CLEANOUTS
TAGS
VALVES

SENSORS & SWITCHES
PUMPS

GENERAL

SYMBOLS PLUMBING LEGEND
Some of the symbols shown may (SOME OF THE ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS SHOWN MAY NOT BE USED ON THIS PROJECT.) not be used on this project.

FIRE PROTECTION

INDUSTRIAL
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000

C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001

G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
P
E
F
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200 Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344 SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300 San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688 LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150 mithun.com
®

DESIGN PARTNER

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT ARCHITECT

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS

PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.

DATE

SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.

All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services. The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.

PROJECT

LOCATION

PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK

DATE ISSUE

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

LINCOLN STREET

VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:29:35 PM
P0.01
05/25/2022
1927400

LEGEND, SYMBOLS, GENERAL NOTES &

DRAWING LIST

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR. SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP

KB / SA

SA / AK

12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL

11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1

05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
MAIN PIPE SIZE (INCHES) 4" EDITED BY JT/RJ
PRESSURE LOSS (PSI/100 FT) 5.81 MAX. LENGTH (FT) 510 UNLIMITED 510 VELOCITY (FT/S) 7.25 LAST EDITED 3/23/2022
TOTAL DEVELOPED HEIGHT (FEET) 100 MAIN SANITARY
PIPE SIZE 6" 8" 6"
TOTAL DEVELOPED LENGTH (FEET) 600 LOCATION Santa Clara, CA

PIPE MATERIAL COPPER TYPE L ORIENTATION VERTICAL HORIZONTAL VERTICAL / HORIZONTAL TOTAL WATER DEMAND - FLUSH VALVE (GPM) 270.00 PROJECT NAME CIVIC CENTER TOTAL WATER DEMAND (WSFU) 1443.00 TYPE WASTE VENT
2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE: APPENDIX A 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE: TABLE 703.2 PROJECT NUMBER MIT-002 TOTAL WATER SUPPLY DEMAND TOTAL SANITARY WASTE DRAINAGE SIZING TOTAL BUILDING WSFU: 1,443 1,326 285
Water Closet, 1.6 GPF Flushometer Valve WC 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 5 3 4 4 4 Service or Mop Basin MS 1 1 1 1 1 0 5 1/2 3 15 3 3 15 14 Kitchen, domestic KS 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1/2 1.5 1.5 1 1/2 2 2 2 Lavatory LV 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1/2 1 1 1 1/2 1 1 1
Hose Bibb, each additional (same branch) HB 3 0 0 0 0 3 6 1/2 1 6 - - - - Hose Bibb HB 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1/2 2.5 5 - - - -
Floor Drain (2") FD 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 - - - 2 2 6 6
Dishwasher, domestic DW 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1/2 1.5 1.5 1 1/2 2 2 2 Clothes Washer, domestic WM 14 0 0 0 0 0 14 1/2 4 56 2 3 42 26

COMMON AREAS FIXTURE LABEL MIN SUPPLY BRANCH SIZE (IN) WSFU PUBLIC

TOTAL WSFU / FIXTURE MIN SIZE TRAP DFU

PUBLIC TOTAL DFU TOTAL GPM
Water Closet, 1.6 GPF Gravity Tank WC 5 33 33 33 33 0 137 1/2 2.5 342.5 3 3 411 105.5 Kitchen, domestic KS 4 26 26 26 26 0 108 1/2 1.5 162 1 1/2 2 216 68.2 Lavatory LV 5 33 33 33 33 0 137 1/2 1 137 1 1/2 1 137 52.5 Dishwasher, domestic DW 4 26 26 26 26 0 108 1/2 1.5 162 1 1/2 2 216 68.2 Bathtub (or Combo Bath/Shower) BT 5 33 33 33 33 0 137 1/2 4 548 1 1/2 2 274 79.8

APARTMENT FIXTURE LABEL MIN SUPPLY BRANCH SIZE WSFU

PRIVATE

TOTAL WSFU / FIXTURE MIN SIZE TRAP DFU

PRIVATE TOTAL DFU TOTAL GPM
3 BEDROOM APT 3BR 1 7 7 7 7 0 29 1" C / UNIT 14.75 COLD / 9.75... 18 2 BEDROOM APT 2BR 2 6 6 6 6 0 26 3/4" C / UNIT 8.5 COLD / 6 HOT 11 1 BEDROOM APT 1BR 0 7 7 7 7 0 28 3/4" C / UNIT 8.5 COLD / 6 HOT 11 STUDIO APT SBR 1 6 6 6 6 0 25 3/4" C / UNIT 8.5 COLD / 6 HOT 11 APARTMENT TYPE TAGS 1st FLOOR 2nd FLOOR 3rd FLOOR 4th FLOOR 5th FLOOR ROOF TOTAL WATER SUPPLY SIZE SYSTEM WSFU / UNIT TOTAL WSFU / UNIT

WATER SUPPLY INFORMATION
2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE: APPENDIX A, TABLE A103.1 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE: TABLE 702.1

DOMESTIC SUPPLY LOAD CALCULATIONS SANITARY WASTE DRAINAGE LOAD

CALCULATIONS
- - ~ MITHUN --0--0 -c:J-
- -0---
///-/-/-/- --QI- ----lOI-
- --6- 0 ----i, --d<I- ~i ----Ne - --&-
---- --+- o= ---ir.- ---II--
El
0 -
=-r
x-
- ------0----
◊ ___.,, --+-
88 -C>- ± ---i,;1-
88 --<I>--
la] 8 ,. .G •.IHltl"°"~ IIUll~lt-~
-+- Q
,. ---e- .

D \ . --e:i-- . t ~--- \ \ ----J!- ,el
___5!,_ '!" _1_
___5!,_
___5!,_
□ _l_
□
□
AJl'PUCANTfflFOfU1ATIOH (BT APPUc:Nn)
I ~Tb7122n0
.-m..to.HT e~e.s. 255 W Jullom St Suite 200
IJINci.!lfPHONEPfOl4011-3t6-S567
ll'PtJC>NTEW.ll.:p1mnnQcwdau;om
PIIW£CTlNfORMAOOO{IYAPIJUCAfff)
Pl!,ilH:l"~1 CMcCen~ Atl,Vlmenta
PRQ]KT~: 11501 Cl~ICCenre<Or.
!Approximately 119 affordable apartmenls 5 stories
PRi)JcIT OBOIPnC,N, lover a podium 1J<1ra9e
I IJlf/1~9-006 l ai.JJI..DINGT"t'PE(tAIJFORHl,\Bt.llLDlf«i~ tto,OffMl!Wli(S}TtJ aE A.DWa)13
A.!r,'IM't'Di!..'-Hf{S)lrl0.,204.J . ... 2'}, 16'1
Plta:JECT HOOEUIIG DATA (CIT'I' TO PROYIDl lO APPUCANT) ;u)WHVl)U..lf'Tl5}N0-1429 lsrAm:•~~Cs)oo.,\641
~PR£SSURE{~):38 AT5AM I STATICPflES5Ulll:{l>il): 46AT SAM ITmRDW (GJM)12010FOR 120MIN
~
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-1223 Agenda Date: 9/27/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Action on a Council Written Request (Council Policy 030) Submitted by Councilmember Becker Requesting to Place an Agenda Item at a Future Council Meeting to Receive a Report Based on the Mayor’s Request Concerning the Related Company and the Prevailing Wage Issues as well as a Report on the Claim from the Union of Painters made with the Department of Industrial Relations and that this Report and Discussion take place at the Council Meeting of October 4, 2022

COUNCIL PILLAR
Enhance Community Engagement and Transparency

BACKGROUND
Council Policy 030 - Adding an Item on the Agenda (Attachment 1) sets forth the procedure for written petitions. Any member of the public or Council may submit a written request raising any issue or item within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council. Per the policy, the written request will be submitted on the agenda, in the form substantially provided by the requestor, without any staff analysis, including fiscal review, legal review and policy review. If a simple majority of the City Council supports further study of the request, then a full staff analysis shall be prepared within thirty (30) days, unless otherwise directed by the City Council.

DISCUSSION
The City Clerk’s Office received a Council Written Request on September 21, 2022 requesting to place an agenda item at a future council meeting to receive a report based on the Mayor’s request concerning the Related Company and the prevailing wage issues as a report on the claim from the Union of Painters made with the Department of Industrial Relations and that this report and discussion take place at the Council meeting of October 4, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with considering the request to be placed on a future agenda except for staff time.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action being considered does not constitute a “project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) in that it is an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City’s official-notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a City of Santa Clara Page 1 of 2 Printed on 9/22/2022
powered by Legistar™
22-1223 Agenda Date: 9/27/2022
Special Meeting. A hard copy of any report to Council may be requested by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 615-2220, email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Set a future Council meeting date to take action on the Written Petition received.

2. Take no action.

3. Any other City Council Action, as determined by the City Council.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff makes no recommendation.

Reviewed by: Nora Pimentel, Assistant City Clerk
Approved by: Rajeev Batra, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Policy and Procedure 030 - Adding an Item on the Agenda

2. Council Written Request submitted by Councilmember Becker dated September 21, 2022 City of Santa Clara Page 2 of 2 Printed on 9/22/2022
powered by Legistar™
RESOLUTION NO. 20-8895

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA,
CALIFORNIA TO REPEAL RESOLUTION NO. 20-8809,
AMEND COUNCIL POLICY 030 ENTITLED "ADDING AN ITEM
ON THE AGENDA," AND APPROVE THE COUNCIL ITEM

REQUEST FORM
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, amending the policy on adding an item on the agenda to establish a clear, effective and easily understood process for members of the City Council and the public to have items within the jurisdiction of the City Council placed on a meeting agenda; WHEREAS, the amended version of the Adding an Item on the Agenda policy expands on the current policy language by clearly stating that, when a written request is first considered, discussion should be limited to whether an item should be added to an agenda and a date, not the merit of the item; and,
WHEREAS, the amended Adding an Item on the Agenda policy, attached hereto as Attachment 1, includes a Council Item Request Form for the City Council's use when requesting an item for inclusion on a Council meeting agenda and adds the procedure for written requests from members of the City Council.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

1. That Resolution No. 20-8809 is hereby rescinded in its entirety.

2. That amended Council Policy 030 entitled "Adding an Item on the Agenda" with the Council Item Request Form, attached hereto as Attachment 1, is hereby approved and adopted, and the City Manager is directed to number (and renumber, as appropriate) the Council Policy Manual such that they are organized in a logical fashion.

II
II
II
Resolution/Amending Adding an Item on the Agenda Policy and Approving Council Item Request Form Page 1 of 2 Rev: 11 /22/17

3. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED

AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 27rH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2020, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCILORS:

NOES: COUNCILORS:

ABSENT: COUNCILORS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS:

Attachments incorporated by reference:

Chahal, Davis, Hardy, O'Neill, and Watanabe,
and Mayor Gillmor
None
None
None

ORA PIMENTEL, MMC

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA

1. Council Policy 030 entitled "Adding an Item on the Agenda" Resolution/Amending Adding an Item on the Agenda Policy and Approving Council Item Request Form Page 2 of 2 Rev: 11 /22/17
City of
Santa Clara
City of Santa Clara
Council Policy Manual
The Center of What's Possi ble

PURPOSE
POLICY

ADDING AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA
To establish a clear, effective, and easily understood process for members of the City Council and the public to have items, within the jurisdiction of the City Council, placed on the City Council agenda for consideration.

Members of the City Council:

The Mayor or any individual Councilmember may submit a written request by using the Council Item Request Form to the City Manager's Office for inclusion of an item on a City Council agenda, provided the request is received two (2) days prior to the public release of the agenda packet. At the meeting where the request is heard, discussion should be limited to whether the item should be added to an agenda and a date, not the merit of the item.

Referral from a Council Committee:

Council Committees may submit a written request to the City Manager's Office for inclusion of an item on a City Council agenda, provided the request is received two (2) days prior to the public release of the agenda packet. ·
Council Committees may bring forward a recommendation to the full City Council by way of the Committee minutes, which are typically prepared within three weeks following the Committee meeting.

Items Referred During a Council Meeting:

By Council action, an item may be referred to the City Manager for inclusion on a City Council agenda. If the request requires further study of the item from staff, a full analysis shall be prepared at the direction of the City Manager with at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the meeting, unless otherwise directed by the City Council. If the request requires more than thirty (30) calendar days to prepare, status updates will be provided to the City Council every sixty (60) days as an informational memo.

Revised 10/27/2020
Resolution No. 20-8895
CP 030 Page 1 of 3
City of
Santa Clara
City of Santa Clara
Council Policy Manual
The Center of What's Possible

PROCEDURE

FOR WRITTEN

PETITIONS

ADDING AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA
Written Petitions and Public Presentations:

Any member of the public may submit a written request raising any issue or item within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council to be heard under. the "Written Petition" section of the City Council's regular agenda within two (2) Council meetings after received . After the initial Written Petition is placed on the agenda, a majority vote of the City Council may add the item to a future Council meeting for action . Any member of the public may address the City Council under the "Public Presentations" section of the agenda. If the presentation includes a request of the Council, a majority vote of the City Council may refer the item to the City Manager to be properly added to a future meeting, in compliance with the Brown Act.

1. All requests to address the City Council shall be submitted in writing .

Written Petition forms are available for the petitioner's convenience on the City's website and in the City Manager's Office, City Clerk's Office, and the Mayor and Council Offices . Alternatively, an email may be submitted to clerk@santaclaraca .gov.

2. Once the Written Petition is received by the City Clerk's Office, it should immediately be forwarded to the City Manager for placement on an agenda within two (2) Council meetings after receipt of the original request from the City Clerk's Office. All written material (request and any support material) will be submitted on the agenda in the form substantially provided by the requester without any staff analysis, including fiscal review, legal review and policy review, until the City Council has had the opportunity to provide direction to the City Manager.

3. At the meeting where the item is first considered, if a majority of the City Council supports further study of the item, then a full staff analysis shall be prepared within thirty (30) days, unless otherwise directed by the City Council. Discussion should be limited to whether an item should be added to an agenda and a date, not the merit of the item .

Revised 10/27/2020
Resolution No. 20-8895
CP 030 Page 2 of 3
City of
Santa Clara
City of Santa Clara
Council Policy Manual
The Center of What's Possible

PROCEDURE

FOR WRITTEN

REQUESTS

FROM CITY

COUNCIL

ADDING AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA

1. Members of the City Council shall use the Council Item Request Form to submit a written request for inclusion of an item on a future City Council agenda.

2. Once the Council Item Request Form is received by the City Clerk's Office, it should immediately be forwarded to the City Manager for placement on an agenda within two (2) Council meetings after receipt of the original request from the City Clerk's Office. All written material (Council Item Request Form and any support material) will be submitted on the agenda in the form substantially provided by the requester without any staff analysis, including fiscal review, legal review and policy review, until the City Council has had the opportunity to provide direction to the City Manager.

3. At the meeting where the item is first considered, if a majority of the City Council supports further study of the item, then a full staff analysis shall be prepared within thirty (30) days, unless otherwise directed by the City Council. Discussion should be limited to whether an item should be added to an agenda and a date, not the merit of the item .

Attachments: Council Item Request Form
Revised 10/27/2020
Resolution No. 20-8895
CP 030 Page 3 of 3
City of
Santa Clara The Center o f Wh at's Pos sible

COUNCIL ITEM REQUEST FORM
The Council Item Request Form is for members of the City Council to submit written requests to the City Manager's Office for inclusion of an item on a future City Council meeting agenda. At the meeting where the initial written request is heard, discussion should be limited to whether the item should be added to an agenda and a date, not the merit of the item. A majority vote of the City Council is required for the item to be added to future Council meeting agenda for action.

CONTACT INFORMATION
Requesting Member of City Council ___________________ _ Contact E-mail ---------------------------- Contact Phone _ ____ __________ ________ ____ _ Today's Date ____________________________ _

WRITTEN REQUEST
I, __________________ , hereby request that the following item be placed on the City of Santa Clara Council and Authorities Concurrent meeting agenda:

Reference: Council Policy 030 - Adding an Item on the Agenda Resolution No. 20-8895
City of
Santa Clara
Th e Center of Who l's Possible
The Council Item Request Form is for members of the City Council to submit written requests to the City Manager's Office for inclusion of an item on a futu·re City Council meeting agenda. At the meeting where the initial written request is heard, discussion should be limited to whether the item should be added to an agenda and a date, not the merit of the item. A majority vote of the City Council is required for the item to be added to future Council meeting agenda for action.

CONTACT INFORMATION
Requesting Member of City Council ___ A_nt_h_o_n.:..y_B_e_c_ke_r ___________ _ Contact E-mail ___ a_be_c_k_e_r@""--s_an_t_a_c_la_ra_c_a....,.g"""o_v ______________ _ 408 917 9434 Contact Phone __________________________ _ Today's Date 0912112022

WRITTEN REQUEST
I, Anthony Becker , hereby request that the following item be placed on the City of Santa Clara Council and Authorities Concurrent meeting agenda:

Would like a report based on the Mayor's request concerning the Related Company and the prevailing wage issue as well as a report on the claim from the Union of Painters made with the Department of Industrial Relations and that this report and djsc1JSsion happen at the council meeting of October 4th, 2022.

Reference: Council Policy 030 - Adding an Item on the Agenda Resolution No. 20-8895
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-902 Agenda Date: 9/27/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Update on City Council and Stadium Authority Staff Referrals

COUNCIL PILLAR
Enhance Community Engagement and Transparency

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
During Council and Stadium Authority meetings, the City Council or Stadium Authority Board provide direction on policy issues or refer information requests to staff for follow-up.

The purpose of the City Council and Stadium Authority Referrals Update is to provide the City Council/Stadium Authority Board and the public a current status report. Completion of the referrals may be communicated by various means such as: Report to Council, Information Memorandum provided through a Council Agenda or monthly City Hall News publication or during a future Council meeting.

The Referrals list will be published in the Council agenda packet under the “City Manager/Executive Director Report” section of the Council Agenda. Reports will include both open and closed referrals.

ATTACHMENTS

1. City Council and Stadium Authority Staff Referrals
City of Santa Clara Page 1 of 1 Printed on 9/22/2022
powered by Legistar™

CITY COUNCIL AND STADIUM AUTHORITY STAFF REFERRALS
FOR FOLLOWͲUP/ACTION
Updated 9/21/22

Page 1 ends
← All documents from this meeting