City Council and Authorities Concurrent
November 15, 2022

Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 1993
Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HAZNET-bb
A list of hazardous waste manifests received each year by Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments.

Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2016
Historical Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HIST MANIFEST-bb A list of historic hazardous waste manifests received by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) from year the 1980 to 1992. The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1992
DTSC Registered Hazardous Waste Transporters: rr-HW TRANSPORT-bb The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains this list of Registered Hazardous Waste Transporters.

Government Publication Date: Oct 19, 2020
Registered Waste Tire Haulers: rr-WASTE TIRE-bb
This list of registered waste tire haulers is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.

Government Publication Date: Dec 16, 2020
California Medical Waste Management Program Facility List: rr-MEDICAL WASTE-bb This list of Medical Waste Management Program Facilities is maintained by the California Department of Public Health. The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment, and disposal of medical waste by providing oversight for the implementation of the Medical Waste Management Act (MWMA). The MWMP permits and inspects all medical waste off-site treatment facilities, medical waste transporters, and medical waste transfer stations. This list contains transporters, treatment, and transfer facilities.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2020
Historical Cortese List:
rr-HIST CORTESE-bb
List of sites which were once included on the Cortese list. The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements for providing information about the location of hazardous sites.

DTSC HWF

INSP COMP ENF
SCH
CHMIRS

HIST CHMIRS
HAZNET

HIST MANIFEST

HW TRANSPORT

WASTE TIRE

MEDICAL WASTE

HIST CORTESE
611 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544 Government Publication Date: Nov 13, 2008
Cease and Desist Orders and Cleanup and Abatement Orders: rr-CDO/CAO-bb The California Environment Protection Agency "Cortese List" of active Cease and Desist Orders (CDO) and Cleanup and Abatement Orders (CAO). This list contains many CDOs and CAOs that do NOT concern the discharge of wastes that are hazardous materials. Many of the listed orders concern, as examples, discharges of domestic sewage, food processing wastes, or sediment that do not contain hazardous materials, but the Water Boards' database does not distinguish between these types of orders.

Government Publication Date: Feb 16, 2012
California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites:
rr-CERS HAZ-bb
List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the following regulatory programs:

Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator. The CalEPA oversees the statewide implementation of the Unified Program which applies regulatory standards to protect Californians from hazardous waste and materials.

Government Publication Date: Feb 9, 2021
Delisted Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites:
rr-DELISTED HAZ-bb
This database contains a list of sites that were removed from the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) in the following regulatory programs: Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator.

Government Publication Date: Nov 29, 2018
Sites in GeoTracker:
rr-GEOTRACKER-bb
GeoTracker is the State Water Resource Control Boards' data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. This is a list of sites in GeoTracker that aren't otherwise categorized as LUST, Land Disposal Sites (LDS), Cleanup Sites, or sites having Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR). This listing includes program types such as Underground Injection Control (UIC), Confined Animal Facilities (CAF), Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program, plans, and non-case information.

Government Publication Date: Jun 22, 2021
Mines Listing:
rr-MINE-bb
This list includes mine site locations extracted from the Mines Online database, maintained by the California Department of Conservation. Mines Online (MOL) is an interactive web map designed with GIS features that provide information such as the mine name, mine status, commodity sold, location, and other mine specific data. Please note: Mine location information is provided to assist experts in determining the location of mine operators in accordance with California Civil Code section 1103.4 and reflects information reported by mine operators in annual reports provided under Public Resources Code section 2207. While the Division of Mine Reclamation (DMR) attempts to populate MOL with accurate location information, the DMR cannot guarantee the accuracy of operator reported location information.

Government Publication Date: Jan 12, 2021
Recorded Environmental Cleanup Liens:
rr-LIEN-bb
The California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) maintains this list of liens placed upon real properties. A lien is utilized by the DTSC to obtain reimbursement from responsible parties for costs associated with the remediation of contaminated properties.

Government Publication Date: Nov 16, 2020
Waste Discharge Requirements: rr-WASTE DISCHG-bb
List of sites in California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program in California, made available by the SWRCB via GeoTracker. The WDR program regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27.

Government Publication Date: Jun 22, 2021
Toxic Pollutant Emissions Facilities:
rr-EMISSIONS-bb
A list of criteria and toxic pollutant emissions data for facilities in California made available by the California Environmental Protection Agency - Air Resources Board (ARB). Risk data may be based on previous inventory submittals. The toxics data are submitted to the ARB by the local air districts as requirement of the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program. This program requires emission inventory updates every four years.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2019
Clandestine Drug Lab Sites:
rr-CDL-bb
The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains a listing of drug lab sites. DTSC is responsible for removal and disposal of hazardous substances discovered by law enforcement officials while investigating illegal/clandestine drug laboratories.

CDO/CAO

CERS HAZ

DELISTED HAZ

GEOTRACKER
MINE
LIEN

WASTE DISCHG

EMISSIONS
CDL
612 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544 Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2021
Tribal
No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State.

County
No County additional environmental databases were selected to be included in the search. 613 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544 h-Definitions
Database Descriptions: This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including: source, information available, time coverage, and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order.

Detail Report: This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are summarized by location, starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity.

Distance:

The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites' boundaries. All values are an approximation.

Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report.

Elevation: The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted. All values are an approximation.

Source: Google Elevation API.

Executive Summary: This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections:
'Report Summary'- Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and, within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section.
'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'- This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section.

Map
Key: The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers always start at #1. The project property will always have a map key of '1' if records are available. If there is a number in brackets beside the main number, this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number in brackets, there is only one record for that property.

The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation': the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation' and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables:

These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. These records may or may not be in your study area, and are included as reference.

Definitions
1 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Property Information
Order Number: 21082700544p
Date Completed: August 28, 2021
Project Number: 575-1902
Project Property: Office Building
1601 Civic Center Drive Santa Clara CA 95050
Coordinates:

Latitude: 37.3538444
Longitude: -121.95601019
UTM Northing: 4134637.77256 Meters
UTM Easting: 592459.258347 Meters
UTM Zone: UTM Zone 10S
Elevation: 75.51 ft
Slope Direction: N
Topographic Information........................................................................................................................................2 Hydrologic Information...........................................................................................................................................4 Geologic Information..............................................................................................................................................7 Soil Information......................................................................................................................................................9 Wells and Additional Sources..............................................................................................................................14 Summary..........................................................................................................................................................15 Detail Report....................................................................................................................................................21 Radon Information.............................................................................................................................................116 Appendix............................................................................................................................................................117 Liability Notice....................................................................................................................................................119 The ERIS Physical Setting Report - PSR provides comprehensive information about the physical setting around a site and includes a complete overview of topography and surface topology, in addition to hydrologic, geologic and soil characteristics. The location and detailed attributes of oil and gas wells, water wells, public water systems and radon are also included for review.

The compilation of both physical characteristics of a site and additional attribute data is useful in assessing the impact of migration of contaminants and subsequent impact on soils and groundwater.

Disclaimer
This Report does not provide a full environmental evaluation for the site or adjacent properties. Please see the terms and disclaimer at the end of the Report for greater detail.

Topographic Information
121"57"3a'l'I 121 ' f'11"3{1'"W
. •. r·-
5 --q-- . ,-
ir6S
.-,
i.l
-:rr22'~ -Ft----i~ - ~~~~Kt:c:.:~ ~ ~ ""?-l=.=.=.~=-=-=,t=.~l;.=-=-::.=-~~~:;:;;=.=::;:;.=.=-~te=:=::~~7'=== ~~-y------:T1r ,.,.-:

I, .,,,.,__: ------ 11 j
l L<.,!
··1~---· 1:1 9 •
,1
\ \..,,,.....,_•-,-,
1_a..- =..,·
~~ .1,.,...:..--t.-.6U H"'..J:;C:;~C__'.:.--.!~~~ ~~~~~P. ~'7"if=--tt-~t7(itl1~~1;----t--::~~~~ "T,VN~ !7':2(1".l)i.'i -l 121 ' 5:!l'O"W'
Curre11t USGS Topo (2015) 0
Quadrang]le(s) : SanJioise W est,O\
Som ce: USGS 7.5 M:inute Topowaph ic Map
\ Nf'¥lHA_µ·s-r
)
1:21"57'0-W
0 .2 0.4
121 "&.'3f.fW
Miles

0.8 N
A
Topographic Information
3 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p The previous topographic map(s) are created by seamlessly merging and cutting current USGS topographic data. Below are shaded relief map(s), derived from USGS elevation data to show surrounding topography in further detail.

Topographic information at project property:

Elevation: 75.51 ft
Slope Direction: N

Hydrologic Information
121 '57'30-W 121 ' 57'0-W
121 '58 '0-W
Wetland
121 '57'30-W
••-====:::::::.••••-Mile6
0 0 .075 0.1 5 0.3 N
This map shows wetland existence using data from US Fish & Wildlife.

Data coverage is shown to the right . Gray indicates no data available in the area. 11111 Freshwater Pond
11111 Lake
11111 Other
121"57'0 -W
11111 Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
11111 Estuarine and Marine Wetland
11111 Freshwater Emergent Wetland
11111 Freshwater Forested / Shrub Wetland 11111 Riverine ER 37'2 1' 30"N
37'2 1'0"N
Hydrologic Information
37"22' 0"N
37"2 1' 30"N
37"2 1'0"N
37'20 ' 30"N
121"58 ' 30-W 121"58 ' 0-W 121 "57' 30-W
121 "58' 30-W 121"58' 0-W 121 "57'30-W
Flood Hazard Zones 0 0.2
This map shows FEMA flood hazard zones . FIRM panels are shown to the right , and blank indicates no data is available.

IIIIA c=J AO
1111 A99 c=J V
- AE VE
AH D o
X
~ OPEN WATER

NOT POPULATED
~ AREA NOT INCLU DED
121"57'0 -W
121"57'0-W
Miles

0.4 N
A
121 "56'30-W
37"22' 0"N
37"2 1'30"1\
37"2 1'0"N
37"20'30"1\
121 '56' 30-W
:c
~ 8 06085c0227 H
i
06085C 0l!29H
Hydrologic Information
6 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p The Wetland Type map shows wetland existence overlaid on an aerial imagery. The Flood Hazard Zones map shows FEMA flood hazard zones overlaid on an aerial imagery. Relevant FIRM panels and detailed zone information is provided below.

Available FIRM Panels in area: 06085C0228H(effective:2009-05-18) 06085C0226H(effective:2009-05-18) 06085C0229H(effective:2009-05-18) 06085C0227H(effective:2009-05-18) 06085C0231H(effective:2009-05-18)
Flood Zone A-01
Zone: A
Zone subtype:

Flood Zone AE-01
Zone: AE
Zone subtype:

Flood Zone AH-01
Zone: AH
Zone subtype:

Flood Zone AO-01
Zone: AO
Zone subtype:

Flood Zone X-01
Zone: X
Zone subtype: 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD
Flood Zone X-14
Zone: X
Zone subtype: AREA WITH REDUCED FLOOD RISK DUE TO LEVEE Geologic Information
121 "57'30 "W
37"21' 30"N
37'2 1'0"N
121 "58' 0"W 121 "57'30 "W
Geologic Units 0
This maps shows geologic units in the area. Please refer to the report for detailed descriptions.
121"57'0 -W
37"2 1'30"N
37"21'0"N
121"57'0 -W

0.2 Geologic Information
8 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p The previous page shows USGS geology information. Detailed information about each unit is provided below.

Geologic Unit Q
Unit Name: Quaternary alluvium and marine deposits
Unit Age: Pliocene to Holocene
Primary Rock Type: alluvium
Secondary Rock Type: terrace
Unit Description: Alluvium, lake, playa, and terrace deposits; unconsolidated and semi- consolidated. Mostly nonmarine, but includes marine deposits near the coast.

Soil Information
121 "57'30 "W
121 "58'0"W 121 "57'30"W
SSURGO Soils 0
This maps shows SSURGO soil units around the target
property . Please refer to the report for detailed soil descriptions . 121"57'0 "W
121"57'0"W

0.2 N
Mil~

0.4 ~
Soil Information
10 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p The previous page shows a soil map using SSURGO data from USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Detailed information about each unit is provided below.

Map Unit 101 (52.27%)
Map Unit Name: Urban land, 0 to 2 percent slopes, basins Bedrock Depth - Min:

Watertable Depth - Annual Min:

Drainage Class - Dominant:

Hydrologic Group - Dominant:

Major components are printed below
Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 101 - Urban land, 0 to 2 percent slopes, basins Component: Urban land (98%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Urban land is a miscellaneous area.

Component: Xerorthents (2%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Xerorthents soil is a minor component.

Map Unit 140 (13.58%)
Map Unit Name: Urban land-Flaskan complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:

Watertable Depth - Annual Min:

Drainage Class - Dominant:

Hydrologic Group - Dominant:

Major components are printed below
Flaskan(20%)
horizon Ap(0cm to 6cm) Sandy loam
horizon ABt(6cm to 17cm) Sandy clay loam
horizon Bt1(17cm to 43cm) Gravelly sandy clay loam
horizon Bt2(43cm to 80cm) Gravelly sandy clay loam
horizon C(80cm to 150cm) Very gravelly sandy loam
Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 140 - Urban land-Flaskan complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes Component: Urban land (70%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Urban land is a miscellaneous area.

Component: Flaskan (20%)
The Flaskan component makes up 20 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. This component is on alluvial fans, alluvial plains. The parent material consists of alluvium derived from metamorphic and sedimentary rock and/or alluvium derived from metavolcanics. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches.

Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3s. Irrigated land Soil Information
11 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p capability classification is 2s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.

Component: Pachic Haploxerolls (5%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Pachic Haploxerolls soil is a minor component.

Component: Landelspark (2%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Landelspark soil is a minor component.

Component: Botella (2%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Botella soil is a minor component.

Component: Stevenscreek (1%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Stevenscreek soil is a minor component.

Map Unit 145 (9.63%)
Map Unit Name: Urbanland-Hangerone complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, drained Bedrock Depth - Min:

Watertable Depth - Annual Min:

Drainage Class - Dominant:

Hydrologic Group - Dominant:

Major components are printed below
Hangerone(25%)
horizon A1(0cm to 24cm) Clay
horizon A2(24cm to 42cm) Clay
horizon Bw(42cm to 68cm) Clay
horizon Bk(68cm to 88cm) Clay
horizon Ck(88cm to 115cm) Clay loam
horizon C(115cm to 183cm) Gravelly loam
horizon 2Ab(183cm to 225cm) Clay
Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 145 - Urbanland-Hangerone complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, drained Component: Urban land (70%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Urban land is a miscellaneous area.

Component: Hangerone (25%)
The Hangerone, drained component makes up 25 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. This component is on urban land, basin floors, basins. The parent material consists of alluvium derived from metamorphic and sedimentary rock and/or alluvium derived from metavolcanics. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is poorly drained.

Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is high. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3s.

Irrigated land capability classification is 2s. This soil meets hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 15 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 1 within 30 inches of the soil surface.

Component: Clear Lake (2%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Clear Lake soil is a minor component.

Component: Bayshore (2%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Bayshore soil is a minor component.

Component: Embarcadero (1%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Embarcadero soil is a minor component.

Soil Information
12 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Unit 180 (16.87%)
Map Unit Name: Urbanland-Newpark complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:

Watertable Depth - Annual Min:

Drainage Class - Dominant:

Hydrologic Group - Dominant:

Major components are printed below
Newpark(20%)
horizon Ap(0cm to 20cm) Silty clay loam
horizon A1(20cm to 45cm) Silty clay loam
horizon A2(45cm to 68cm) Silty clay loam
horizon Ck1(68cm to 91cm) Silty clay loam
horizon Ck2(91cm to 132cm) Silty clay loam
horizon C1(132cm to 160cm) Fine sandy loam
horizon C2(160cm to 200cm) Fine sandy loam
Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 180 - Urbanland-Newpark complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes Component: Urban land (70%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Urban land is a miscellaneous area.

Component: Newpark (20%)
The Newpark component makes up 20 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. This component is on alluvial fans, alluvial plains. The parent material consists of alluvium derived from metamorphic and sedimentary rock and/or alluvium derived from metavolcanics. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained.

Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is high.

Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3s. Irrigated land capability classification is 1 This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 5 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface.

Component: Still (5%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Still soil is a minor component.

Component: Elpaloalto (5%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Elpaloalto soil is a minor component.

Map Unit 185 (7.66%)
Map Unit Name: Urban Land - Bayshore complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, drained Bedrock Depth - Min:

Watertable Depth - Annual Min:

Drainage Class - Dominant:

Hydrologic Group - Dominant:

Major components are printed below
Bayshore(20%)
horizon A1(0cm to 7cm) Loam
horizon A2(7cm to 30cm) Loam
horizon ABt(30cm to 66cm) Loam
horizon ABtk(66cm to 96cm) Sandy clay loam
horizon Ck(96cm to 129cm) Sandy clay loam
horizon C(129cm to 154cm) Gravelly sandy loam
Soil Information
13 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 185 - Urban Land - Bayshore complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, drained Component: Urban land (70%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Urban land is a miscellaneous area.

Component: Bayshore (20%)
The Bayshore component makes up 20 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. This component is on urban land, basin floors, basins. The parent material consists of alluvium derived from metamorphic and sedimentary rock and/or alluvium derived from metavolcanics. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is high.

Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3s. Irrigated land capability classification is 1 This soil meets hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 15 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface.

Component: Hangerone (10%)
Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Hangerone soil is a minor component.

Wells and Additional Sources
121 "57'30 -W
121 "57'30-W
Wells & Additional Sources N
A ---======-----■ Miles
• Sites with Higher Elevation
■ Sites with Same Elevation
'Y Sites with Lower Elevation
0 ~ OGW Sites with Higher Elevation
■ OGW Sites with Same Elevation
'Y' OGW Sites with Lower Elevation

0.04 0.08 0. 16
E R. 1 5
O Sites with Unknown Elevation • OGW Sites with Unknown Elevation 37"2 1'0"N
Wells and Additional Sources Summary
15 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Federal Sources
Public Water Systems Violations and Enforcement Data
Map Key PWS ID Distance (ft) Direction
4 CA4310012 635.31 NNE
Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)
Map Key PWS ID Distance (ft) Direction
4 CA4310012 635.31 NNE
USGS National Water Information System
Map Key Monitoring Loc Identifier Distance (ft) Direction 7 USGS-372121121571001 793.83 NE
State Sources
Oil and Gas Wells
Map Key ID Distance (ft) Direction
No records found
Periodic Groundwater Level Measurement Locations
Map Key ID Distance (ft) Direction
No records found
Well Completion Reports
Map Key WCR No Distance (ft) Direction
1 WCR2016-014094 145.04 E
2 WCR2002-008280 210.75 WNW
2 WCR2002-008281 210.75 WNW
3 WCR2007-002501 529.29 SSW
5 WCR2007-013404 713.74 SSW
6 WCR2015-000204 765.66 SE
8 WCR2016-010057 919.03 SW
8 WCR2019-001135 919.03 SW
8 WCR2016-017289 919.03 SW
9 WCR1993-004561 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0068676 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0070101 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0048266 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-011377 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-006161 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-004559 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0312553 949.91 WSW
Wells and Additional Sources Summary
16 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p 9 WCR1995-002353 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-010816 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2015-000196 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007486 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2002-008233 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007490 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2000-005023 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-010734 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-007148 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1994-004490 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2002-008235 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-010818 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-004557 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1997-002974 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007375 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-006166 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-007140 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-007143 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-007141 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-001726 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2007-002502 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0113586 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0237298 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-007318 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0203669 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-007144 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0101747 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2010-002908 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2004-006637 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-001727 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2000-007105 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-007068 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-008542 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1985-002195 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1990-008244 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-007541 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-007538 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-004405 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1986-003699 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-001724 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-001721 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1985-002199 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-007907 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1990-008481 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-010535 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1986-004824 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0109387 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1997-002975 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2002-008760 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1988-008253 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1776-001273 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007485 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007489 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1997-007024 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-005241 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1994-004488 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2001-005893 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-001723 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0192804 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-007500 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-004560 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0070098 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0039091 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0257229 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1985-002887 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-010537 949.91 WSW
Wells and Additional Sources Summary
17 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p 9 WCR2010-003000 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1988-006055 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-005360 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-003348 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007487 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007370 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-006660 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1994-004489 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-010735 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0268365 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-008543 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1996-002329 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-001293 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1986-001464 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1985-002886 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-007015 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0203145 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0284121 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0015224 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0268887 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-004404 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-005642 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2015-000201 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-003347 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-006167 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2010-002997 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2007-002499 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1997-002973 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2002-000737 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1990-010164 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-006165 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-007539 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2010-002999 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-005233 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0117886 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2010-002995 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2015-000199 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-004562 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-005926 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-007139 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-001379 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-007069 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2015-000200 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-006664 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007378 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2007-002500 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-010736 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-007238 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-004554 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-005236 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-007659 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-001296 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1985-002200 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-009430 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0141311 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0203146 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2015-000198 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007371 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1988-002686 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-005237 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1994-002291 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-007537 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1996-002330 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1998-004354 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-009431 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0018289 949.91 WSW
Wells and Additional Sources Summary
18 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p 9 WCR0103605 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0070100 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0120333 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-001476 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-001376 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-005925 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007491 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1986-001589 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0156190 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0188172 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1985-002196 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-010738 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-005235 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-005230 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007373 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-004555 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-004552 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-007236 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-005238 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2000-007103 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1986-001463 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007488 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2015-000193 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1997-003034 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-004558 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007492 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1996-006165 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-005240 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007484 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2015-000180 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1996-002328 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-010737 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1997-003565 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-004563 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2011-001039 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1986-001465 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-009549 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0124424 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-007146 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2010-002998 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1990-010248 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007372 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2000-007104 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-004403 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0187058 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0171223 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-005641 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0192002 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-006163 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-006162 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-008240 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-008541 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007374 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-001295 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1988-006057 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1997-003563 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0117887 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-005640 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007861 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0111870 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0218370 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1988-006058 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-001722 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-005242 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2010-002996 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-009550 949.91 WSW
Wells and Additional Sources Summary
19 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p 9 WCR1992-007147 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-004484 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-011378 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007376 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1997-003562 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1988-004946 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-002355 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-007142 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1990-009752 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0229999 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-006164 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-002354 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-005231 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-007540 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2015-000206 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-010536 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2000-005024 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2002-008232 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1990-009751 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-007145 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1988-006056 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-010733 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007377 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2010-002910 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007379 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0235607 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2004-006355 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-001725 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007368 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-006200 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-007381 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2002-008231 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0128202 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0111872 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-010817 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0014903 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0198601 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1990-008480 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1988-004056 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2015-000197 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2005-007536 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-007237 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-007177 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-009433 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-005874 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-007660 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1996-002496 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2015-000202 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2004-002138 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-001294 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1990-010163 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-007369 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1988-007902 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-010910 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1999-002325 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2015-000203 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1990-009753 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-004553 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0230000 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2010-003001 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1987-001827 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-006168 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1990-008350 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1998-004905 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-008367 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-005239 949.91 WSW
Wells and Additional Sources Summary
20 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p 9 WCR0198602 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0010380 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-009548 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1986-001588 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-007178 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0136981 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2002-008230 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-005639 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1989-009432 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0163263 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0235609 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1999-002324 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1992-005234 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1998-004906 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2003-005875 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2010-002909 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-001378 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1997-002976 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2010-002911 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1993-004556 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1990-010162 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2015-000205 949.91 WSW
9 WCR0120335 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1990-010247 949.91 WSW
9 WCR2002-008234 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1991-008540 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1995-005359 949.91 WSW
9 WCR1990-010246 949.91 WSW
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
21 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Public Water Systems Violations and Enforcement Data
Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 4 NNE 0.12 635.31 66.34 PWSV
Address Line 2:

State Code: CA
Zip Code: 95050
City Name: SANTA CLARA
Address Line 1: 1500 Warbuton Avenue
PWS ID: CA4310012
PWS Type Code: CWS
PWS Type Description: Community Water System
Primary Source Code: SWP
Primary Source Desc: Purchased Surface Water
PWS Activity Code: A
PWS Activity Description: Active
PWS Deactivation Date:

Phone Number: 408-615-2014
--Details--
Population Served Count: 117200
City Served: SANTA CLARA
County Served: Santa Clara
State Served: CA
Zip Code Served:

Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)
Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 4 NNE 0.12 635.31 66.34 SDWIS
PWS ID: CA4310012
PWS Type: Community water system
No of Facilities: 49
No of Violations: 3
No of Site Visits: 18
Cities Served: SANTA CLARA
Counties Served: Santa Clara
Population Served Count: 117,200
Primacy Agency: California
EPA Region: Region 9
USGS National Water Information System
Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 7 NE 0.15 793.83 66.19 FED USGS
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
22 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Organiz Identifier: USGS-CA Formation Type:

Organiz Name: USGS California Water Science
Center
Aquifer Name: California Coastal Basin aquifers
Well Depth: 810 Aquifer Type:

Well Depth Unit: ft Country Code: US
Well Hole Depth: 940 Provider Name: NWIS
W Hole Depth Unit: ft County: SANTA CLARA
Construction Date: Latitude: 37.3557246
Source Map Scale: 24000 Longitude: -121.9537522
Monitoring Loc Name: 007S001W03H002M
Monitoring Loc Identifier: USGS-372121121571001
Monitoring Loc Type: Well
Monitoring Loc Desc:

HUC Eight Digit Code: 18050003
Drainage Area:

Drainage Area Unit:

Contrib Drainage Area:

Contrib Drainage Area
Unit:

Horizontal Accuracy: .5
Horizontal Accuracy Unit: seconds
Horizontal Collection
Mthd:

Mapping grade GPS unit (handheld accuracy range 12 to 40 ft) Horiz Coord Refer
System:

NAD83
Vertical Measure: 67
Vertical Measure Unit: feet
Vertical Accuracy: 2.5
Vertical Accuracy Unit: feet
Vertical Collection Mthd: Interpolated from topographic map.

Vert Coord Refer System: NGVD29
Well Completion Reports
Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 1 E 0.03 145.04 70.92 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2016-014094 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.353889
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.353889 Decimal Longitude: -121.955 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.955
Location(OSWCR): CITY OF SANTA CLARA RIGHT-OF-WAY
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: CITY OF SANTA CLARA RIGHT-OF-WAY
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
23 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p 2 WNW 0.04 210.75 75.56 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2002-008280 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3541667 Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3541667 Decimal Longitude: -121.9572222 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.9572222
Location(OSWCR): 1656 SCOTT BLVD
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1656 SCOTT BLVD
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 2 WNW 0.04 210.75 75.56 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2002-008281 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3541667 Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3541667 Decimal Longitude: -121.9572222 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.9572222
Location(OSWCR): 1655 SCOTT BLVD
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLAR
Location: 1655 SCOTT BLVD
City: SANTA CLAR
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 3 SSW 0.10 529.29 78.10 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2007-002501 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude:

Decimal Lat(OSWCR): Decimal Longitude:

Decim Long(OSWCR):

Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 5 SSW 0.14 713.74 79.58 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2007-013404 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
24 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.351667
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.351667 Decimal Longitude: -121.957222 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.957222
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 6 SE 0.15 765.66 76.53 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2015-000204 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude:

Decimal Lat(OSWCR): Decimal Longitude:

Decim Long(OSWCR):

Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 8 SW 0.17 919.03 79.02 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2016-010057 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.352
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.352 Decimal Longitude: -121.959
Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.959
Location(OSWCR): 1990 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1990 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 8 SW 0.17 919.03 79.02 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2019-001135 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.352
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.352 Decimal Longitude: -121.959
Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.959
Location(OSWCR): 1990 El Camino Real
City(OSWCR): Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
25 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: 1990 El Camino Real
City: Santa Clara
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 8 SW 0.17 919.03 79.02 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2016-017289 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.352
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.352 Decimal Longitude: -121.959
Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.959
Location(OSWCR): 1990 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1990 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-004561 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0068676 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
26 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0070101 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0048266 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-011377 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-006161 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
27 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-004559 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0312553 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-002353 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
28 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-010816 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2015-000196 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007486 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
29 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2002-008233 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007490 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2000-005023 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-010734 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
30 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007148 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1994-004490 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2002-008235 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
31 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-010818 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-004557 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1997-002974 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
32 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007375 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-006166 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007140 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007143 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
33 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007141 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-001726 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2007-002502 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
34 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0113586 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0237298 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-007318 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
35 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0203669 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007144 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0101747 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2010-002908 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
36 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2004-006637 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1846 LOS PADRES
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1846 LOS PADRES
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-001727 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2000-007105 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
37 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-007068 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-008542 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1985-002195 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
38 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1990-008244 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-007541 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): PALO ALTO
Location: 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City: PALO ALTO
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-007538 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): PALO ALTO
Location: 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City: PALO ALTO
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-004405 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
39 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1986-003699 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-001724 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-001721 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
40 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1985-002199 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-007907 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1990-008481 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SAN JOSE
Location: None
City: SAN JOSE
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
41 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-010535 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1986-004824 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0109387 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1997-002975 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
42 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2002-008760 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 WORBURTON
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1995 WORBURTON
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1988-008253 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SAN JOSE
Location: None
City: SAN JOSE
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1776-001273 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
43 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007485 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007489 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1997-007024 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
44 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-005241 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1994-004488 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2001-005893 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-001723 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
45 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0192804 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-007500 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-004560 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
46 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0070098 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): CIVIC CENTER WARBURTON AVE
City(OSWCR): None
Location: CIVIC CENTER WARBURTON AVE
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0039091 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0257229 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
47 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1985-002887 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-010537 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2010-003000 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1988-006055 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
48 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-005360 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-003348 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007487 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
49 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007370 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-006660 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1994-004489 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
50 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-010735 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0268365 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-008543 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1996-002329 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
51 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-001293 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1986-001464 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1985-002886 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
52 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-007015 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0203145 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0284121 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
53 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0015224 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0268887 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-004404 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-005642 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
54 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2015-000201 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-003347 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-006167 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
55 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2010-002997 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2007-002499 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1997-002973 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
56 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2002-000737 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1990-010164 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-006165 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-007539 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
57 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): PALO ALTO
Location: 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City: PALO ALTO
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2010-002999 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-005233 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0117886 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
58 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2010-002995 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2015-000199 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-004562 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
59 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-005926 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007139 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-001379 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-007069 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
60 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2015-000200 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-006664 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007378 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
61 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2007-002500 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-010736 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007238 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
62 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-004554 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-005236 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-007659 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-001296 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
63 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1985-002200 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-009430 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0141311 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
64 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0203146 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 WORBURTON AVE
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1995 WORBURTON AVE
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2015-000198 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007371 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
65 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1988-002686 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-005237 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1994-002291 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-007537 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
66 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): PALO ALTO
Location: 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City: PALO ALTO
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1996-002330 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1998-004354 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-009431 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
67 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0018289 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0103605 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0070100 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
68 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0120333 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1AA5 WARBURTON AVE
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1AA5 WARBURTON AVE
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-001476 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-001376 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-005925 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
69 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007491 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 ARBURTON AVE
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1995 ARBURTON AVE
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1986-001589 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0156190 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): HARRISON AVENUE WEST OF SCOTT BLVD
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
70 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: HARRISON AVENUE WEST OF SCOTT BLVD
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0188172 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1985-002196 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-010738 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
71 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-005235 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-005230 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SAN JOSE
Location: None
City: SAN JOSE
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007373 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-004555 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
72 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-004552 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007236 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-005238 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
73 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2000-007103 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1986-001463 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007488 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 WARBURTON AVENUE
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1995 WARBURTON AVENUE
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
74 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2015-000193 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1997-003034 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-004558 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007492 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
75 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1996-006165 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-005240 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007484 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
76 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2015-000180 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1996-002328 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-010737 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
77 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1997-003565 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-004563 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2011-001039 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1986-001465 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
78 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-009549 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0124424 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007146 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
79 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2010-002998 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1990-010248 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007372 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
80 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2000-007104 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-004403 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0187058 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0171223 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
81 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-005641 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0192002 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-006163 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
82 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-006162 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-008240 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): PALO ALTO
Location: 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City: PALO ALTO
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-008541 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
83 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007374 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-001295 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1988-006057 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1997-003563 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
84 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0117887 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-005640 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007861 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
85 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: 1995 WARBURTON AVE
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0111870 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1995 EL CAMINO
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1995 EL CAMINO
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0218370 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1988-006058 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
86 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-001722 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-005242 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2010-002996 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-009550 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
87 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007147 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-004484 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-011378 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
88 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007376 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1997-003562 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1988-004946 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
89 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-002355 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007142 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1990-009752 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SAN JOSE
Location: None
City: SAN JOSE
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0229999 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
90 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-006164 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-002354 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-005231 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SAN JOSE
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
91 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SAN JOSE
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-007540 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): PALO ALTO
Location: 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City: PALO ALTO
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2015-000206 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-010536 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
92 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2000-005024 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2002-008232 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1990-009751 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SAN JOSE
Location: None
City: SAN JOSE
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007145 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
93 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1988-006056 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-010733 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007377 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
94 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2010-002910 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007379 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0235607 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
95 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2004-006355 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1196 RED ST & JACKSON
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1196 RED ST & JACKSON
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-001725 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1795 SCOTT BLVD
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007368 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-006200 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
96 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007381 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2002-008231 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0128202 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
97 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0111872 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-010817 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0014903 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
98 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0198601 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1990-008480 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SAN JOSE
Location: None
City: SAN JOSE
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1988-004056 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SAN JOSE
Location: None
City: SAN JOSE
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2015-000197 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
99 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2005-007536 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): PALO ALTO
Location: 2320 EL CAMINO REAL
City: PALO ALTO
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-007237 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-007177 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
100 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-009433 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-005874 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-007660 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
101 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1996-002496 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2015-000202 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2004-002138 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 20025 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 20025 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-001294 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
102 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1990-010163 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-007369 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1988-007902 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
103 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-010910 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1999-002325 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2015-000203 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
104 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1990-009753 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-004553 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0230000 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2010-003001 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
105 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1987-001827 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-006168 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1990-008350 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
106 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1998-004905 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-008367 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-005239 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
107 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0198602 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0010380 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): LOS PADRES BLVD NO CABRILLO
City(OSWCR): SAN JOSE
Location: LOS PADRES BLVD NO CABRILLO
City: SAN JOSE
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-009548 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1986-001588 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
108 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-007178 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0136981 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2002-008230 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
109 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-005639 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1989-009432 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0163263 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
110 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0235609 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): None
Location: None
City: None
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1999-002324 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1992-005234 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1998-004906 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
111 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2003-005875 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2010-002909 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-001378 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
112 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1997-002976 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2010-002911 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1810 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1993-004556 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
113 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1990-010162 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2015-000205 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1499 LINCOLN ST
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1499 LINCOLN ST
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR0120335 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: 1265 EL CAMINO REAL
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1990-010247 County: Santa Clara
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
114 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR2002-008234 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1991-008540 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1995-005359 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report
115 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 9 WSW 0.18 949.91 78.36 WATER WELLS
WCR No: WCR1990-010246 County: Santa Clara
County(OSWCR): Santa Clara Decimal Latitude: 37.3523
Decimal Lat(OSWCR): 37.3523 Decimal Longitude: -121.95937 Decim Long(OSWCR): -121.95937
Location(OSWCR): None
City(OSWCR): SANTA CLARA
Location: None
City: SANTA CLARA
Original Source: California Department of Water Resources - OSWCR(Well Numbers), as of Apr 29, 2020; California Department of Water Resources - Well Completion Reports Radon Information
116 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p This section lists any relevant radon information found for the target property.

Federal EPA Radon Zone for SANTA CLARA County: 2
Zone 1: Counties with predicted average indoor radon screening levels greater than 4 pCi/L Zone 2: Counties with predicted average indoor radon screening levels from 2 to 4 pCi/L Zone 3: Counties with predicted average indoor radon screening levels less than 2 pCi/L Federal Area Radon Information for SANTA CLARA County
No Measures/Homes: 77
Geometric Mean: 0.7
Arithmetic Mean: 1.4
Median: 1
Standard Deviation: 1.9
Maximum: 9.2
% >4 pCi/L: 9
% >20 pCi/L: 0
Notes on Data Table: TABLE 1. Screening indoor
radon data from the EPA/State
Residential Radon Survey of
California conducted during
1989-90. Data represent 2-7
day charcoal canister
measurements from the lowest
level of each home tested.

Appendix
117 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Federal Sources
FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer FEMA FLOOD
The National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) data incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) databases published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and any Letters Of Map Revision (LOMRs) that have been issued against those databases since their publication date. The FIRM Database is the digital, geospatial version of the flood hazard information shown on the published paper FIRMs. The FIRM Database depicts flood risk information and supporting data used to develop the risk data. The FIRM Database is derived from Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published FIRMs, flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data, where available.

Indoor Radon Data

INDOOR RADON
Indoor radon measurements tracked by the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) and the State Residential Radon Survey.

Public Water Systems Violations and Enforcement Data PWSV List of drinking water violations and enforcement actions from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) made available by the Drinking Water Protection Division of the US EPA's Office of Groundwater and Drinking Water. Enforcement sensitive actions are not included in the data released by the EPA.

Address information provided in SWDIS may correspond either with the physical location of the water system, or with a contact address.

Radon Zone Level RADON ZONE
Areas showing the level of Radon Zones (level 1, 2 or 3) by county. This data is maintained by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) SDWIS
The Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) contains information about public water systems as reported to US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by the states. Addresses may correspond with the location of the water system, or with a contact address.

Soil Survey Geographic database SSURGO
The Soil Survey Geographic database (SSURGO) contains information about soil as collected by the National Cooperative Soil Survey at the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Soil maps outline areas called map units. The map units are linked to soil properties in a database. Each map unit may contain one to three major components and some minor components.

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wetland Data US WETLAND
The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wetland layer represents the approximate location and type of wetlands and deepwater habitats in the United States.

USGS Current Topo US TOPO
US Topo topographic maps are produced by the National Geospatial Program of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The project was launched in late 2009, and the term "US Topo" refers specifically to quadrangle topographic maps published in 2009 and later.

USGS Geology

US GEOLOGY
Seamless maps depicting geological information provided by the United States Geological Survey (USGS).

USGS National Water Information System

FED USGS
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)'s National Water Information System (NWIS) is the nation's principal repository of water resources data. This database includes comprehensive information of well-construction details, time-series data for gage height, streamflow, groundwater level, and precipitation and water use data.

State Sources
Oil and Gas Wells OGW
A list of Oil and Gas well locations. This is provided by California's Department of Conservation Division of Appendix
118 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources.

Periodic Groundwater Level Measurement Locations MONITOR WELLS Locations of groundwater level monitoring wells in the Department of Water Resources (DWR)'s Periodic Groundwater Levels dataset. The DWR Periodic Groundwater Levels dataset contains seasonal and long- term groundwater level measurements collected by the Department of Water Resources and cooperating agencies.

Well Completion Reports

WATER WELLS
List of wells from the Well Completion Reports data made available by the California Department of Water Resources' (DWR) Online System for Well Completion Reports (OSWCR). Please note that the majority of well completion reports have been spatially registered to the center of the 1x1 mile Public Land Survey System section that the well is located in.

Liability Notice
119 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21082700544p Reliance on information in Report: The Physical Setting Report (PSR) DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as a review of environmental databases and physical characteristics for the site or adjacent properties.

License for use of information in Report: No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s) may not be modified or re-sold.

Your Liability for misuse:

Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties, and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service.

No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and State government departments. The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS Information Inc. disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report.

Trademark and Copyright:

You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report(s) are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s) (the "Data") is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s) and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS.

HISTORICAL RESEARCH INFORMATION
Project Property: Office Building
1601 Civic Center Drive
Santa Clara CA 95050
Project No: 575-1902
Requested By: lntertek PSI
Order No: 21082700544
Date Completed: August 30,2021
Environmental Risk Information Services
A division of Glacier Media Inc.

1.866.517.5204 I [email protected] erisinfo.com
Date Source
1939 Agriculture and Soil Conservation Service
1948 US Geological Survey
1956 Agriculture and Soil Conservation Service
1960 US Geological Survey
1968 US Geological Survey
1970 US Geological Survey
1974 US Geological Survey
1980 US Geological Survey
1982 National High Altitude Photography
1987 National Aerial Photography Program
1993 US Geological Survey
2003 National Agriculture Information Program
2004 National Agriculture Information Program
2005 National Agriculture Information Program
2006 National Agriculture Information Program
2009 National Agriculture Information Program
2010 National Agriculture Information Program
2012 National Agriculture Information Program
2014 National Agriculture Information Program
2016 National Agriculture Information Program
2018 National Agriculture Information Program
2020 National Agriculture Information Program
Environmental Risk Information Services
A division of Glacier Media Inc.

1.866 .517.5204 I [email protected] erisinfo.com
Scale Comments
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500' Best Copy Available
1" = 500' Best Copy Available
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
1" = 500'
one Inch
I -A-
Year: 1939
Source: ASCS
Scale: l" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -121.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 2 1082700544
Year:

Source:

Scale:

Comment:
1948
USGS
1" = 500'
Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -12 l.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 2 1082700544
Year: 1956
Source: ASCS
Scale: l" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -121.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 2 1082700544
Year: 1960
Source: USGS
Scale: l" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -121.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 2 1082700544
Year:

Source:

Scale:

Comment:
1968
USGS
l" = 500'
Address: 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: - 121 .95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 21082700544
ER 1 5
Year: 1970
Source: USGS
Scale: I " = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -121.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 2 1082700544
ER 1 5
Year: 1974
Source: USGS
Scale: l" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara CA
Approx Center: -121.9560 1019,37.3538444 '
Order No: 2 l 082700544
ER 1 5
Year:

Somce:

Scale:

Comment:
1980
USGS
l" = 500'
Address: 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -1 21.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 21082700544
ER 1 5
Year: 1982
Source: NHAP
Scale: l" = 500'
Address: 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -121.95601019 ,37.3538444
Comme nt: Best Copy Available
Order No: 21082700544
Year: 1987
Source: NAPP
Scale: 1 " = 500'
Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -121.95601019 ,37.3538444
Comment: Best Copy Avai lable
Order No: 2 1082700544
Year: 1993
Source: USGS
Scale: 1" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -121.9560 ! 019,37.3538444
Order No: 21082700544
ER 1 5
Year: 2003
Source: NAIP
Scale: l" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -121.9560 1019,37.3538444
Order No: 21082700544
Year: 2004
Source: NAIP
Scale: 1" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -12l.9560 1019,37.3538444
Order No: 21082700544
Year: 2005
Source: NAIP
Scale: l" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara , CA
Approx Center: - 121.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 21082700544
ER 1 5
Year: 2006
Source: NAIP
Scale: l" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -121.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 21082700544
Year: 2009
Source: NAIP
Scale: l" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -121.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 2 1082700544
Year: 20 10
Source: NAIP
Scale: l" = 500'
Comment:

Address: I 60 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -121.9 5601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 2 I 082700544
Q ..:::w::::.
-
Year: 20 12
Source: NAlP
Scale: l" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -121.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 2 I 082700544
Year: 2014
Source: NAIP
Scale: l" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: - 121.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 2 l 082700544
ER 1 5
Year: 2016
Source: NAIP
Scale: l" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara , CA
Approx Center: -12l.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 21082700544
Year: 20 18
Source: NAlP
Scale: l " = 500'
Comme nt:

Address: I 60 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -12 1.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 2 I 082700544
ER 1 5
Year: 2020
Source: NAlP
Scale: l" = 500'
Comment:

Address: 160 I Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
Approx Center: -121.95601019 ,37.3538444
Order No: 21082700544
Project Property:

Project No:

Requested By:

Order No:

Date Completed:

Office Building
1601 Civic Center Drive
Santa Clara CA 95050
575-1902
Intertek PSI
21082700544
August 28, 2021
Please note that no information was found for your site or adjacent properties.

Project Property: Office Building
1601 Civic Center Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Project No: 575-1902
Requested By: Intertek PSI
Order No: 21082700544
Date Completed: September 2, 2021

Search Results Summary
Date Source Comment
2020 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2016 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2012 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2009 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2006 HAINES
2001-2002 HAINES
1995-1996 HAINES
1990-1991 HAINES
1987 HAINES
1981 HAINES
1976 HAINES
1971 HAINES
1966 PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1961 PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1957 PACIFIC TELEPHONE
September 2, 2021
RE: CITY DIRECTORY RESEARCH
Office Building
1601 Civic Center Drive Santa Clara, CA
Thank you for contac ng ERIS for an City Directory Search for the site described above. Our staff has conducted a reverse lis ng City Directory search to determine prior occupants of the subject site and adjacent proper es. We have provided the nearest addresses(s) when adjacent addresses are not listed. If we have searched a range of addresses, all addresses in that range found in the Directory are included.

Note: Reverse Lis ng Directories generally are focused on more highly developed areas. Newly developed areas may be covered in the more recent years, but the older directories will tend to cover only the "central" parts of the city. To complete the search, we have either u lized the ACPL, Library of Congress, State Archives, and/or a regional library or history center as well as mul ple digi zed directories. These do not claim to be a complete collec on of all reverse lis ng city directories produced.

ERIS has made every effort to provide accurate and complete informa on but shall not be held liable for missing, incomplete or inaccurate informa on. To complete this search we used the general range(s) below to search for relevant findings. If you believe there are addi onal addresses or streets that require searching please contact us at 866-517-5204.

Search Criteria:
1546-1680 of Civic Center Drive
1655-1745 of El Camino Real

Page: 2 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com
1601 BECKY WALLIN...Nonclassified Establishments
1601 MARKETEX COMPUTER CORP...Computer & Equipment Dealers 1601 MARKETEX COMPUTER CORP...Computer Software
1601 MISSION CENTER...Nonclassified Establishments
1601 ONLINE CALIFORNIA TITLE LOANS...Check Cashing Service 1601 RETAIL CASHBACK...E-commerce
1601 ROOTS BAY AREA...Nonclassified Establishments
1601 SANTA CLARA CABLE...Cable & Other Subscription Programming 1601 WEBMASTER INC...Internet Home Page Dev Consulting
1601 WEBMASTER INC...Internet Service
1680 ALABASTER & ASSOC...Accounting & Bookkeeping General Svc 1680 ARMESTO JR & CO...Tax Return Preparation & Filing
1680 CASEMAKER INC...Computer Software
1680 CASEMAKER INC...Data Processing Software
1680 LOVE FUND USA...Marketing Consultants
1680 NURSE BUILDERS...Home Builders
1680 QUESTIVITY...Computer Software
1680 QUESTIVITY...Computer Services
1680 QUESTIVITY...Computer & Equipment Dealers
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE2020
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
1655 RAMADA LIMITED-SANTA CLARA...Hotels & Motels
1655 RAMADA LIMITED-SANTA CLARA...Ecommerce
1680 DISH NET WORK BY DISH SAT...Television-cable & Catv 1680 DISH NETWORK...Cable (mfrs)
1680 TACO BELL...Cafes
1680 TACO BELL...Restaurants
1680 TACO BELL...Foods-carry Out
1700 HOLIDAY INN...Ecommerce
1700 HOLIDAY INN...Hotels & Motels
1705 A AMERICAN DEBT CONSOLIDATION...Debt Adjusters
1705 BANK OF THE WEST...Real Estate Loans
1705 BANK OF THE WEST...Banks
1705 DISH NETWORK...Electronic Stores
1713 ALLSTATE INSURANCE...Insurance
1713 ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO-RICHARD...Insurance
1715 ELEGANT HAIR & NAILS...Beauty Salons
1717 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS...Paint-retail
1745 DENNY'S...Cafes
1745 DENNY'S...Foods-carry Out
1745 DENNY'S...Restaurants
EL CAMINO REAL2020
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 3 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com
1601 CHRONICLE DATA...Data Communications Systems-networks 1601 ESCOBAR, ANTHONY I...Attorneys
1601 MARKETEX COMPUTER CORP...Computer & Equipment Dealers 1601 OWEN PROPERTIES...Office Buildings & Parks
1601 POWER...Electrical Power Systems-maintenance
1601 RETAIL CASHBACK...E-commerce
1601 SANTA CLARA CABLE...Cable & Other Subscription Programming 1601 VASTEDGE...Marketing Programs & Services
1601 WEBMASTER INC...Internet Service
1680 ALABASTER & ASSOC...Accounting & Bookkeeping General Svc 1680 APPROACH ME INC...Nonclassified Establishments
1680 ARMESTO JR & CO...Tax Return Preparation & Filing
1680 CASEMAKER INC...Computer Software
1680 LOVE FUND USA...Marketing Consultants
1680 NURSE BUILDERS...Home Builders
1680 QUESTIVITY...Computer Services
1680 QUESTIVITY...Computer Software
1680 UP JOHN HEALTH SVC...Health Services
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE2016
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
1655 RAMADA LIMITED-SANTA CLARA...Hotels & Motels
1680 DISH NET WORK BY DISH SAT...Television-cable & Catv 1680 DISH NET WORK BY DISH SAT...Cable & Other Subscription Programming 1680 TACO BELL...Foods-carry Out
1680 TACO BELL...Restaurants
1700 HOLIDAY INN...Hotels & Motels
1705 A AMERICAN DEBT CONSOLIDATION...Debt Adjusters
1705 BANK OF THE WEST...Banks
1705 DISH NETWORK...Electronic Stores
1705 ELAVON...Credit Card & Other Credit Plans
1705 SECURITY SYSTEM INSTALLATION...Security Control Equip & Systems-whls 1713 ALLSTATE INSURANCE...Insurance
1713 RAISLEY, TERRY AGT...Insurance
1715 ELEGANT HAIR & NAILS...Beauty Salons
1717 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS...Paint-retail
1745 COMCAST CABLE...Television-cable & Catv
1745 DENNY'S...Foods-carry Out
1745 DENNY'S...Restaurants
EL CAMINO REAL2016
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 4 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com
1601 ESCOBAR, ANTHONY I...Attorneys
1601 MARKETEX COMPUTER CORP...Computer & Equipment Dealers 1601 OWEN PROPERTIES...Office Buildings & Parks
1601 POWER...Electrical Power Systems-maintenance
1601 WEBMASTER INC...Internet Service
1680 AIR BUSINESS EXP INC ABX WORLD...Business Services Nec 1680 ALABASTER & ASSOC...Accounting & Bookkeeping General Svc 1680 CASEMAKER INC...Computer Software
1680 LOVE FUND USA...Foreign Exchange Brokers & Dealers 1680 PINNACLE HR SOLUTIONS INC...Nurses & Nurses' Registries 1680 QUESTIVITY...Computer Services
1680 UP JOHN HEALTH SVC...Nonclassified Establishments
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE2012
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
1655 RAMADA LIMITED...Hotels & Motels
1680 DISH NET WORK BY DISH SAT...Television-cable & Catv 1680 TACO BELL...Restaurants
1700 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS...Hotels & Motels
1705 A AMERICAN DEBT CONSOLIDATION...Debt Adjusters
1705 BANK OF THE WEST...Banks
1705 ELAVON...Credit Card & Other Credit Plans
1705 SECURITY SYSTEM INSTALLATION...Security Control Equip & Systems-whls 1713 KENNETH JACKSON-ALLSTATE AGENT...Insurance
1715 ELEGANT HAIR & NAILS...Beauty Salons
1717 PASHA MARKET...Grocers-retail
1745 COMCAST SANTA CLARA...Television-cable & Catv
1745 DENNY'S...Restaurants
EL CAMINO REAL2012
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 5 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com
1601 BLDG...Communications Svs
1601 BLDG...Unclassified
1601 BLDG...Offic Bldg Oper
1601 BLDG...Data Proc & Prep
1601 BLDG...Computer,softwr Str
1601 WEBMASTER INC...Internet Service
1680 ALABASTER & ASSOC...Accounting & Bookkeeping General Svc 1680 BLDG...Education Consultant
1680 BLDG...Subdividers & Devel
1680 BLDG...Computer Software
1680 BLDG...Real Estate Loans
1680 BLDG...Comp Sftwre & Acc
1680 BLDG...Employment Agencies & Opportunities
1680 BLDG...Air Cargo Carr,sched
1680 BLDG...Nclassifiable Estab
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE2009
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
1655 ASSTIK CORP...Hotels & Motels
1655 ASSTIK CORP...Hotels & Motels
1655 RAMADA...Hotels & Motels
1655 RAMADA INN...Hotels & Motels
1680 TACO BELL...Restaurants
1680 TACO BELL...Quick Serv Mexican
1700 HOLIDAY INN...Hotels & Motels
1700 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS SNTA CLARA...Motels & Hotels Reservations 1705 BANK OF THE WEST...Banks
1705 BANK OF THE WEST...National Coml Banks
1705 NOVA INFORMATION SYSTEMS...Short-term Bus Cred
1713 ALLSTATE INSURANCE...Insurance
1713 ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO...Insurance Agents,brkr
1715 ELEGANT HAIR & NAILS...Manicuring
1715 ELEGANT HAIR & NAILS...Beauty Shops
1717 PASHA MARKET...Grocers-retail
1717 PASHA MARKET...Grocery Stores
1745 DENNYS...Restaurants
1745 DENNYS RESTAURANT...Cafe/diner/family Rest
EL CAMINO REAL2009
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 6 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com
1375 NO LISTING
1601 MARXETEX COMPUTER CORP
1601 OWEN PROPERTIES
1601 UP FRONT COMMUNICATIONS
1601 WEBMASTER INCORPORATED
1680 AIR BSNSS EXPRSS INC ABX WRLD
1680 ALABASTER & ASSOCIATES
1680 BURGG & ASSOCIATES INC
1680 CASEMAKER INC
1680 NURSE BUILDERS INC
1680 PINNACLE HR SOLUTIONS INC
1690 APARTMENTS
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE2006
SOURCE: HAINES
1610 ALL STAR GLASS ¿¿
1655 PATEL RAMESHVASANJI
1655 RAMADA LIMITED
1680 TACO BELL
1700 HOLIDAY INN EPRESS
1705 BANK OF THE WEST
1713 ALLSTATE INS CO
1713 JACKSON KEN
1715 ELEGANT HAIR&NAILS
1717 PASHA MARKET
1745 DENNY'S RESTAURANT
1790 YOSHNOYA RESTAURANT
EL CAMINO REAL2006
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 7 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com
1500 COMMUNITY SERV
1500 SCLAR CTY PLNG
1601 ACROSSWORLD COMMUNICANONS INC
1601 BLOSSW HL ESTATES
1601 LEON N G CONSTRUCTION
1601 MARKETEX COMPUTER CORP
1601 OWEN PROPERTIES
1601 OWEN VICKR
1601 WEBMASTER INCORPORATED
1641 XXXX
1680 ALABASTER&ASSOCIATES
1680 CASEMAKER INC
1680 QUALITY STRUCTURAL ENGRG&DSGN
1680 TRIKAAL INFOTECH
1685 XXXX
1690 APARTMENTS
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE2001-2002
SOURCE: HAINES
1655 ASSTIK CORP
1655 PATEL RAMESHASANJI
1655 RAMADA LIMITED
1680 TACO BELL
1700 KIM JOHN
1702 KIM JOHN
1705 BANK WST BRANCH LOCATION
1713 ALLSTATE INS SALES
1713 JACKSON KEN
1715 ELEGANT HAIR&NAILS
1717 XXXX
1719 XXXX
1745 DENNYS RESTAURANT
1785 XXXX
EL CAMINO REAL2001-2002
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 8 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com
1425 XXXX
1541 BUILDING
1541 POLICE DEPT ARREST
1541 POLICE DEPT DIAL TP
1541 POLICE DEPT PATROL
1541 POLICE DEPT THEFT
1541 POLICEDEPT RECORDS
1541 SCLAR CTY POL
1541 SCLAR CTY POL RESRV
1541 SCLAR CTY POL ARREST
1541 SCLAR CTY POL BYCLE
1541 SCLAR CTY POL CRIME
1541 SCLAR CTY POL DTCTV
1541 SCLAR CTY POL PAL
1541 SCLAR CTY POL RCRTG
1541 SCLAR CTY POL TIP
1541 SCLAR CTY POL TRFFC
1541 SCLAR CTY POL TRNG
1541 SCLAR CTY POL WRRNT
1541 SCLAR CTY POLAFFRS
1541 SCLAR CTY POLPATRL
1601 A S C TECHNOLOGIES
1601 ADULT INDPNDNCE CTR
1601 BLOSSOM HL ESTATES
1601 BUILDING
1601 ESCOBAR A I ATTY
1601 HONEN VICTOR H 3D
1601 MARXETEX
1601 MISSION CTY FED CR
1601 OVEN PROPERTIES
1601 SEVEIRA N R ATTY
1601 TECHSERV
1601 WOODSIDE MOBILE HMS
1641 ALABASTER&ASSOCIATE
1641 CASEMAKER INC
1641 COMPUTER TYME
1641 FILPUNO BUYERS PGS
1641 GAGNER TOONEY ASSOC
1641 VILLAFRANCA TONY
1641 XXXX
1685 XXXX
1700 APARTMENTS
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE1995-1996
SOURCE: HAINES
1610 AMER AUTO SALES
1655 ASSTIK CORP
1655 SCLAR MOTELODGE
1680 XXXX
1700 CESENA VIC&SONS ATO
1702 XXXX
1705 BANK WST BRANCH
1713 ALLSTATE INS SALES
1713 JACKSON KEN
1715 BLASE NAILS
1717 ACTIVE ELECTRONICS
1719 XXXX
1745 DENNYS REST S CLARA
1785 XXXX
EL CAMINO REAL1995-1996
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 9 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com
1541 NO LISTING
1601 AMDAHL CORP
1601 BLOSSOM ML ESTATES
1601 BUILDING
1601 COURTESY EXHANGE
1601 MARKETEX
1601 MEYER CARE HLTH SVS
1601 NO LISTING
1601 OMEGA PRTCTN SYSTWS
1601 OWEN GROUP
1601 OWEN MANAGEMENT
1601 OWEN VICTOR H 3D
1601 OWEN VICTOR H JR
1601 PAC COAST PRODUCERS
1601 PAC ENVRNMNTL GROUP
1601 PROSERVICE COMPUTER
1601 TELEX CONNECTION
1641 XXXX
1680 BUILDING
1680 CA VETS ADVOCACY
1680 CAREER CENTER
1680 COMPUTERS UNLIMITED
1680 FISH RAYMOND G ATTY
1680 GAGNER TOOMEY ASSOC
1680 HOWARD ROBIN
1680 JIMSAL CMPTR CNSLT
1680 MAIDA JOHN&ASSOCTS
1680 NO LISTING
1680 PROFSNL ACCOUNT MNG
1680 SERVI MATIC SANJSE
1680 STATE FARM INS AGNT
1680 UNIVRSL INS AGCY
1685 XXXX
1700 APARTMENTS
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE1990-1991
SOURCE: HAINES
1610 HARRISONS MARINE CT
1655 SCLAR MOTELOOGE
1680 MIKES EXCLNT FOODS
1700 CESENA VIC&SONS
1700 VIDALS
1702 JONES RADIATOR SERV
1705 BANK WST INFO
1705 BANK WST SVGS & CHCKG
1713 ALLSTATE INS SALES
1716 COPY PLACE THE
1716 PUBLISHING PLACE
1717 CAL AUTO INC
1719 XXXX
1745 DENNYS REST S CLARA
1785 XXXX
EL CAMINO REAL1990-1991
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 10 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com
1601 A S A P COURIER SRV
1601 BUILDING
1601 CENTCIRCUIT INTL
1601 COMNCTN CENTER THE
1601 COMPATIBLE CMPONENT
1601 E X I M A
1601 I D A
1601 INTL DATA APPLICTNS
1601 MARKETEX
1601 MEYER CARE HME HLTH
1601 MISSION COMMNCTN
1601 NO LISTING
1601 OWEN VICTOR H 3D
1601 OWEN VICTOR H JR
1601 PAC CST PRODUCERS
1601 PRIME SHARE
1601 PROSERVICE COMPUTER
1601 SPECTRA SYSTEMS
1641 XXXX
1680 BUILDING
1680 C M S
1680 CLINICOM MANGMNT SV
1680 COPAS G E TAX CNSLR
1680 DUBER INDSTAL SCRTY
1680 GAGNER TOOMEY ASSOC
1680 HERNANDEZ C&ASC
1680 HOWARD ROBIN
1680 JIMSAL CMPTR CNSLT
1680 MINI SYSTEMS ASCTS
1680 NO LISTING
1680 PROFSNL ACCOUNT MNG
1680 STATE FARM INS SCLA
1680 UNIVRSL INS AGCY
1680 UPJOHN HLTH CARE SV
1680 UPJOHN HLTHCRE SVS
1685 XXXX
1700 APARTMENTS
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE1987
SOURCE: HAINES
1610 HARRISONS MARINE CT
1655 SCLAR MOTELODGE
1680 SPIROS FMLY REST
1700 CESENA VIC&SONS
1700 CIRCLE TRACK RACING
1700 VIDALS
1702 JONES RADIATOR SERV
1702 JONES RENTAL
1705 BANK WST INFO
1705 BANK WST SVGS & CHCKG
1713 ALLSTATE INS SCLARA
1715 COPY MILL SECRTL SV
1715 COPY MILL THE
1717 CAL AUTO INC
1719 XXXX
1745 DENNYS REST S CLARA
1785 XXXX
1790 XXXX
EL CAMINO REAL1987
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 11 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com
1541 SCLAR CT POL DTCTY
1541 SCLAR CT POL INFO
1541 SCLAR CT POL RECRD
1541 SCLAR CT POL VEHCL
1541 SCLAR CT POL BCYCL
1541 SCLAR CT POL BUS
1541 SCLAR CT POL P A L
1541 SCLAR CT POLICE
1601 AQUA DOME
1601 BARNES W A CFP
1601 BENETECH INC
1601 BOLINO PETER&ASC
1601 BUILDING
1601 CA PRFSNL COMPUTING
1601 CARBORUNDUM CO INC
1601 CITILINE AGENCY
1601 CRANBROOK INTL INC
1601 ENERGY CNSRVTN BRKR
1601 G E C C FINANCIAL
1601 GENL ELEC CRDT MRTG
1601 HOFFMAN JON A
1601 I D A
1601 INTL DATA APPLICTNS
1601 MARKETEX
1601 MEYER CARE HME HLTH
1601 MICRO FOCUS
1601 MICROGLOBE CORP
1601 NATL MICRONETCS INC
1601 OLD MISSION EXECTV
1601 ORDER DESK
1601 OWEN VICTOR H
1601 OWEN VICTOR H 3D
1601 PAC COAST PRODUCERS PRIME
1601 S E M DEVELOPRS INC
1601 SEQUOIA INSURANCE
1601 TORIN CORP
1601 WALLPAPERS TO GO
1601 WEBER ASSOCIATES
1680 ASSOCTN FR PSYCHLGC
1680 CMS
1680 A S A P SECRTAL SRV
1680 ANDREWS INS AGNCY
1680 BUILDING
1680 CENTER PSYCHTHRPY
1680 CLINICOM MNG SERV
1680 COPAS GLENN E
1680 FIBERGLAS SNTA CLAR
1680 HBC
1680 MULTI TENANT RESIDENTIAL
1680 PRINDLE WEBR
1680 PROFSNL ACCOUNT MNG
1680 PROFSNL TEMPRY SV
1680 RICE THOS G
1680 S A M C O
1680 SAVINGS ASN MRTG CO
1680 SCHNUR STEVEN W
1680 STATE FARM INS
1680 STOUT WM J
1680 UPJOHN HLTH CARE SV
1685 XXXX
1700 APARTMENTS
1700 BARNETT BARRY
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE1981
SOURCE: HAINES
1610 CIRCLE PRESS EMER
1655 SCLAR MOTELODGE
1680 SPIROS FMLY REST
1700 CESENA VIC & SONS
1700 CIRCLE TRACK RACING
1700 VIDALS
1702 JONES RADIATOR SERV
1705 BANK OF WST SC CHKG
1705 BANK OF WST SC INFO
1705 BANK OF WST SC LN
1713 ALLSTATE INS CO
1715 ALLSTATE INS
1715 COPY MILL THE
1717 XXXX
1719 CAL AUTO SUPPLY
1719 LENEMANN INC
1719 SOUZA DISTRIBUTORS
1719 WINE WAREHOUSE
1745 DENNYS REST S CLARA
1785 XXXX
1805 ACC U TUNE
EL CAMINO REAL1981
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 12 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com
1541 XXXX
1601 CENTRY PAST
1601 DAVID M SEMAS ENTP
1601 MEYER CARE HME HLTH
1601 PAC COAST PRODUCERS
1601 PUROLATOR SECURITY
1601 S E M DEVELOPERS
1601 SEMAS D M ENTPRS
1700 APARTMENTS
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE1976
SOURCE: HAINES
1610 XXXX
1655 MOTELODGE SNTA CLRA
1655 SCLAR MOTELODGE
1680 UNCLE JOHNS PANCAKE
1700 CESENA VIC SONS CO
1700 CIRCLE TRCK EQPMT
1700 VIDALS
1702 JONES RADIATOR SERV
1705 FIRST NTL S CLARA
1785 XXXX
EL CAMINO REAL1976
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 13 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com

NO LISTINGS IN RANGE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE1971
SOURCE: HAINES
1600 CROCKER CTZN NTL
1610 ORAVEC B CHEVRON
1655 MOTELODGE SCLARA
1655 SANTA CLARA MOTELDG
1680 UNCLE JOHN FMLY RST
1700 CESENA VIC&SONS CO
1700 HARSHALL ZENO H
1700 VIDALS
1702 XXXX
1785 I NMAN LOIS E
EL CAMINO REAL1971
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 14 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com

NO LISTINGS IN RANGE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE1966
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1610 BILL ORAVECS CHEVRON
1655 SANTA CLARA MOTELODGE
1680 UNCLE JOHNS PANCAKE
1700 CESENA V AUTO ELEC
1700 VIDALS
1702 IV DRIVE IN
1810 SANTA CLARA BEACON
EL CAMINO REAL1966
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
Page: 15 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com

STREET NOT LISTED
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE1961
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1625 FUJII FLOWER SHOP
1680 UNCLE JOHNS PANCAKE
1700 CESENA V AUTO ELEC
1700 VIDALS
1702 JOHNSONS TEXACO SVC
1810 DUKES SERVICE STATION
EL CAMINO REAL1961
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
Page: 16 Report ID: 21082700544 - 9/2/2021
www.erisinfo.com

STREET NOT LISTED
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE1957
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1625 SANTA CLARA NURSERY
1700 CESENA V AUTO ELEC
1700 VIDALS SPANISH INN
1702 JOHNSONS TEXACO SVC
1810 DUKES SERVICE STATION
EL CAMINO REAL1957
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
--- END REPORT ---

REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW DOCUMENTATION
= GeoTracker
Bray Ave
eilly Auto Pans
1ery
' •
a.
(/)
0 0
::i
OJ
&
Dally Donuts &
Sandwich Bagels lakeout • Delivery
q q Hidaya Foundation
Nps plaza
q Warbur1on Place
Onshorexq
Farme rs Insurance . ft Perfect Ten
Jeannette Reymundo T q
(/)
0 0
::i
OJ
< a. •
~
E
l!?
..0
~
r
Hlllebrant Park
0 Hillebrant Pl
is
'io
CT
al
a
:!1
q
is
'io
CT
iil
a
::!!
Matt Chesebrough
Photography
(p
Precis ion Tune Auto Care
Auto iepair shop
Burger King
Delr\lery
El Camino Real
9 .....

Bethel Korean Church 4'
ASAP Credit Repair
qg
0 :,
n
Triton Ct -
'
Civic Center Dr
'
legacy personnel
0 .s 8 .s ...,
t
'
Santa Clara
Human Resources
f City of Santa Clara
C
Charg
fs
Q Plaza des
I!.\ WCI Electric ·
Y Commercia l & ...
q Civic c
DIRECTV Santa Clara enter Dr
Bank of the West - ATM
Denny's
Takeout • Delivery
•
El Camino Real
' f Bank of the West
fl
..
"'
l;l
El Camino Real
Kenle'e
e
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
San Francisco Bay Region @ .
'
Terry Tamminen
Secre1arJ for
En,·1ro11me11tal
Prorecr,011
1515 Clay Street. Sutte 1400, Oakland, Cahfomia 94612
(510) 622-2300 • Fax (510) 622-2460
http://v.rww.swrcb.ca. go,-/rwqcb2
April 23, 2004
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Governor
File No. 43-3105 (BGS)
Mr. Jim Parissenti
City of Santa Clara
Engineering Department
15 00 Warburton A venue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Subject: Transmittal of the Closure Letter and Site Closure Summary - Santa Clara Police Station, 1541 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, Santa Clara County, SCVWDID # 07SlW03G05f, LOP# 10-023
Dear Mr. Parissenti:

Attached please find the uniform underground storage tank closure letter and the site closure summary for the subject site. Please contact Barbara Sieminski of my staff at (510) 622-2423 or e-mail [email protected] if you any questions regarding this matter.

Residual contamination both in soil and groundwater remains at the site that could pose an unacceptable risk under certain site development activities such as site grading, excavation, or the installation of water wells. The District and the appropriate planning and building department shall be notified prior to any changes in land use, grading activities, excavation, and installation of water wells. This notification shall include a statement that residual contamination exists on the property and list all mitigation actions, if any, necessary to ensure compliance with this site management requirement. The levels of residual contamination and any associated site risk are expected to reduce with time.

Sincerely,
~
Executive Officer
Enclosures Closure Letter
Case Closure Summary (S pages} with Attachments (23 pages} jcc: (w/o Summary)
Ms. Grace Cheng
SCVWD
5750 Almaden Expwy
San Jose, CA 95118
Ms LiiyLee
SWRCB
UST Cleanup Fund
Ms. Dianna Flanagin
SWRCB
UST Programs Inf. Sys,
Preserving, enhancing, and restoring the San Francisco Bay Area's waters for over 50 years V Recycled Paper
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
San Francisco Bay Region
·. Terry Tamminen
• Secreinryfor
Env1ro11me111al
Protection
1515 Clay Street. Suite 1400, Oakland, Cahfomia 94612
(510) 622-l300 • Fax (5 i 0} 622-2460
http://www.swrcb.ca gov/rwqcb2
April 23, 2004
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Governor
File No. 43-3105 (BGS)
Mr. Jim Parissenti
City of Santa Clara
Engineering Department
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Subject: Case Closure - Santa Clara Police Station, 1541 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, Santa Clara County, SCVWDID # 07S1W03G05f, LOP# 10-023 Dear Mr. Parissenti:

This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action for the underground storage tanks formerly located at the above described location. Thank you for your cooperation throughout this investigation. Your willingness and promptness in responding to our inquiries concerning the fonner underground storage tanks are greatly appreciated.

Based upon the available information, including the land use, and with the provision that the infonnation provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, no further action related to the underground storage tank release is required.

This notice is issued pursuant to a regulation contained in Title 23, California Water Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 16, Section 2721(e). If change in land use is proposed, the owner must promptly notify this agency.

Please contact our office, if you have any questions regarding this matter.

Sincerely,
____ ..
· ruce H. Wolfe
Executive Officer
Preserving, enhancing, and restoring the San Francisco Bay Area's watersfo1' over 50 years O Recycled Paper
Son!o Gara Valley Waler Dismcl 6

CASE CLOSURE SUMMARY
Leaking Underground Fuel Storage Tank Program
Date: March 12, 2004
I. AGENCY INFORMATION
Phone: 408 265-2600
Title: Water Quali S ecialist
II. CASE INFORMATION
I
Site Facilitv Name: Santa Clara Police Station
Site Facility Address: 1541 Civic Center Dr., Santa Clara 95050 RB LUSTIS Case No: N/A Local Case No: 07S1W03G05f LOP Case No.: 10-023 URF Filing Date: N/A1 SWEEPS No.: N/A APN: 224-25-074
Responsible Parties Address Phone Number
City of Santa Clara 1500 Warburton Avenue, Santa (408) 615-3061 Mr. Jim Parissenti Clara, CA 95050
Closed
Tank I.D. No. Size in Gallons Contents In Place/Removed? Date 1 2,000 Diesel Removed 1985
2 4,000 Gasoline Removed 1985
3 10,000 Gasoline Removed 1989
4 4,000 Gasoline Removed March 1997
5 12,000 Gasoline Removed September 2001
6 2,000 Diesel Removed September 2001
Piping Removed 1985,1989, 1997
and 2001
Ill. RELEASE AND SITE CHARACTERIZATION INFORMATION
Cause and Type of Release: UST system
Site characterization complete? Yes I Date Aooroved b·, Oversioht Aoencv: 3/12/2004 Monitoring wells installed? No Number: -- Proper screened interval? -- Highest GW Depth Below Ground Lowest Depth:----* Flow Direction:----* Suriace: ----*
Most Sensitive Current Use: Potential Drinking Water Supply 1= no URFs were found in Santa Clara Valley Water District's files. * Monitoring wells were not installed for this investigation at the subject site.

Summary of Production Wells in Vicinity: During this closure evaluation, one active and two abandoned wells were identified within the ¼ mile radius of the subject site.

Well Number Well Permit Status Depth (ft) Type Direction 07S01W03H002 86W1822 Active 810 M/1 -740 E
07S01W03G001 N/A Abandoned N/A AG - 564 SE
07S01 W03G002 NIA Abandoned 500 Dom -740SW
Notes
M/1 = Municipal and Industrial Water Supply Well
Ag= Agriculture Water Supply Well
Dom = Domestic Water Supply Well
NIA= Not Available
Are drinking water wells affected? No Aquifer Name: Santa Clara Valley Groundwater Basin
Is surface water affected? No Nearest SW Name: None is found.

Off-site Beneficial Use Impacts (Addresses/Locations): None Reports on file? Yes Where are reports filed?
Santa Clara Valley Water District

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF AFFECTED MATERIAL
Material Amount (Include Units) Action (Treatment or Disposal Date w/Destination)
Tank 2 steel Disposed; Oakland, CA December
1986
2 steel Disposed; Richmond, CA 1989 and
2 Steel Disposed; Unknown Destination March 1997
2001
Piping Not Reported Removed and D~sposed to Unknown 1986, 1989, Destinatipn 1997 and
2001
Free Product ---- ---- ---
Soil 120 cubic yards Disposed; Santa Clara, CA May 1989 80 cubic vards Disposed; Santa Clara, CA June 1989
Groundwater ---- ---- ----
Barrels ---- ---- ----

MAXIMUM DOCUMENTED CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS BEFORE AND AFTER CLEANUP Please see Attachment 2,3 for additional infonnation on contaminant locations and concentrations Soil (oom) Water (ppb) Soil~ oom) Water(oob)
Contaminant Before After Before After Contaminant Before After Before TPH {Gas) 11, 111 2,100 5 NA Xvlenes <52 <52 426
TPH NA NA NA NA Ethyl benzene <52 <52 5.26
(Diesel)
Benzene <52 <52 105 <16 Oil & Grease NA NA NA
Toluene <52 <52 125 <16 Heavy Metals NA NA NA
8260 *,3 ND **•6 ND MTBE (If not 0.883 0.0584 4106:-
analyzed,
explain below
Descriotion of Interim Remediation Activities: Over-excavation was performed at the tank pit, 2001.

Notes
1= Soil samples collected beneath the 10,000 gallon tank at 13 feet bgs, 1989 2= Soil samples collected beneath the 4,000 gallon tank at 7 feet bgs, 1997 3= Soil samples collected beneath the 12,000 gallon tank, September, 2001 4= Soil samples collected beneath the tank after soil over-excavation, October 2001 5= Groundwater sample collected from the 4,000 gallon tank pit, 1997 6= Groundwater sample collected from the 12,000 gallon tank pit, September 2001 After
<16

5.26 NA
NA
21 1:··
7=Groundwater sample collected subsequent to pumping of the 12,000 gallon tank excavation pit, September 2001
* 0.21 ppm tert-Butanol
** 30 ppb tert-Butanol
*** Via EPA Method 8260
NA= Not analyzed for this compounds
ND= Below the detection limit.

IV. CLOSURE
Does completed corrective action protect existing beneficial uses per the Regional Board Basin Plan? Yes
Does completed corrective action protect potential beneficial uses per the Regional Board Basin Plan? Yes
Does corrective action protect public health for current land use? Santa Clara Valley Water District staff does not make specific determinations concerning public health risk. However, it does not appear that the release would present a risk to human health.

Site Management Requirements: Residual contamination both in soil and groundwater remains at the site that could pose an unacceptable risk under certain site development activities such as site grading, excavation, or the installation of water wells. Therefore, the impact or the disturbance of any residual contamination or the installation of a water well in the vicinity of the residual contamination shall be assessed and appropriate action taken so that there is no significant impact to human health, safety, or the environment. This could necessitate additional sampling, health risk assessment, and mitigation measures.

The District and the appropriate planning and building department shall be notified prior to any changes in land use, grading activities, excavation, and installation of water wells. This notification shall include a statement that residual contamination exists on the property and list all mitigation actions, if any, necessary to ensure compliance with this site management requirement. The levels of residual contamination and any associated site risk are expected to reduce with time.

Should corrective action be reviewed if land use chanoes? Number of Wells Commissioned:-- I Number of Wells
Decommissioned: --
List Enforcement Actions Taken: None
List Enforcement Actions Rescinded: None
V. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, DATA, ETC.

Site Summary:
1985:

Yes, please see site manaoement requirements
I Number of Wells Retained:--
In November, two underground storage tanks (USTs) (one 2,000 gallon diesel and one 4,000 gallon gasoline) were removed. Santa Clara Valley Water District and the San Jose Fire Department did not have records of soil or groundwater analytical results. According to historical records, both tanks were replaced. 1989:

In May, a 10,000 gallon gasoline UST was removed. Approximately 200 cubic yards were excavated during the tank removal activity. A total of 120 cubic yards of soil was disposed and the remaining 80 cubic yards of soil was left on-site to aerate. Two soil samples were collected beneath the tank and up to 11 parts per million (ppm) Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon as Gasoline (TPHG) were detected. A 12,000 gallon gasoline tank was installed to replace the 10,000 gallon gasoline tank. 1997:

In March, a 4,000 gallon gasoline UST was removed. Up to 2,100 parts per billion (ppb) TPHG and 1 0 ppb Benzene were detected in a pit groundwater sample.
2001:

In September, two USTs (one 2,000 gallon diesel and one 12,000 gallon gasoline) were removed. Up to

0.88 ppm Methyl tert Butyl Ether (MTBE) was detected in soil and 41 0 ppb MTBE was detected in a pit roundwater sam le. Groundwater in the tank it was subse uentl um ad, allowed to rechar e and pumped again. The pit water sample was sampled for the second time and detected up to 21 ppb of MTBE.

On September 29, over-excavation was performed on the east side of the 12,000 gallon tank pit.

Approximately 3 feet was removed and up to 0.058 ppm MTBE was detected in collected confirmation soil samples.

Conclusions:

Residual petroleum hydrocarbon contamination exists beneath the site, however, the extent of impacted soil and groundwater appears to be limited in extent and all sources have been removed from the subject site.

Furthermore, we expect the remaining contamination to continue naturally attenuate. Therefore, Santa Clara Valley Water District have concluded that a continuing threat to groundwater, human health and the environment from residual petroleum hydrocarbons does not exist at this site and that Regional Water Control Board objectives have not been compromised. Therefore, no further corrective action is necessary at th is time.

VI. LOCAL AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE DATA
Prepared by: Grace Cheng Title: Water Quality Specialist Signature: Date: 3-12-()'-1-
Title: Engineering Unit Manager
Signature: Date: g-22-0
This closure approv is ased upon the availa information and with the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and re resentative of site conditions.

APR 06 2004 10:14 FR RE GIONAL WATER ~IT510 622 2464 TO 914089795694 VII.. REGIONAL BOARD NOTIFICATION
Regional Board Staff Name; Barbara Sieminski
RB esponse: Concur based solely upon
infarmatio ure summa .

Attachments:

1. Site maps

2. Site map for soil sampling locations. 1989
2a. Analytical scU sampling results
Tit\e: Engineering Geologiot
Date: O?J /'30 04

3. Sita map. for soil and groundwa\er sampling locattons, 1997 Sa. Analytical soil and groundwater sampling results

4. Site map for soH and groundwater sampUng lcoations. 2001 4a. Anatytieaf soil and groundwater sampling results
s. Sita map for soil sampling Jocations subsequent to over-excaYation, 2001 5a. Analytical son and groundwa1ar sampling results subsequent to excavation_ 2001 I
P.02/02
This document ancf the related Case Closure Letter, Shalf be retained by the lead agency as part of the officiaJ site file.
·-- ----· - -
>l<>i< TOTAL PAGE.02 **

ENVIRO STOR
1_-_1-_ ' ~---
13 Cleanup Sil es
r'A ■ Federal Superfund
r'A ■ Slate Response
r'A D Voluntary Cleanup
r'A D School Cleanup
r'A D Evaluation
r'A D School lnvesligalion
r'A ■ Military Evaluation
r'A D Tiered Permit
r'A ■ Corrective Action
D o Field Points
STATUS
Al I Stat uses -
El Permilted Siles
r'A • Operating
r'A 0 Post-Closure
r'A 0 Non-Operating
I 1±1 Other Sites I
I IE GIS Layers I
B--=-- ~ : __ ~ -= ii -~ :j
- AKE A TOUR SHARE THIS MAP
· Auto Pans
•
' +
~ 1601 Civic Ce nter Drive, Santa C lara, CA, USA 1
mHIHI 0
~
8 .s
'
y
ChargePoint
Charging Station y Onshorexy < ;;·
0 Hidaya Founda tion .,
?.
~
!;'
,on Place
Perfect Ten
q
<i'
~
f!
.0
~ ~ :i: co CT
Hillebrant Park al
?.
q 3!
D
Hillebrant Pl
~ ,..

CT
al
a
J2
•
Burger King
Oelwery
q
Matt Chesebrough
Photography
Precision Tune Auto Care
Auto repair shop
'
0 < ;;·
() .,
~
!;'
Bethel Korean Churc
-J
Santa Clara
Human Resou rces f Silicon Valley Power
f City of Santa Clara
,,
ASAP Credit Repair
-.-~
0 :,
0 Triton Ct -
'
;! s :,
S?
Civic Center Dr
'
legacy personne l
Blink Charging Station
q Plaza de Santa Clara
~ WCI Electric -
□ Comme rcial & ...
q Civic c
DIRECTV Santa Clara enter Dr
Bank of the West - ATM
•
Civic center Ot
Denny's
Takeout· Dellwry
•
f Bank of the West
Civic
Center Park
Landscap,,d
city park with
water features
fl
El Camino Real
Pr
£1 earn
-
C, SITES CURRENTI.Y VISIBLE ON MAP 2 SITES LISTED

PROJECT NAME
0 A PPLrEO MATERIALS. rNC . CORONADO
0 S HEA HOMES - SCOTT BLV D. PROJ ECT
STATUS
INACTrv:. · NEEDS EVALUATION

NO FURTHER ACTION

PROJ EC T TYPE

TIERED PER MIT
VOLUl'ITA RY CLEANUP
t

INTERVIEW DOCUMENTATION
9/2/2021 Details - ParcelQuest Statewide
https://assr.parcelquest.com/Statewide/Details/0 1/1
© 2021 ParcelQuest   |   www.parcelquest.com   |   Privacy Policy   |   Refund Policy   |   Disclaimer   |   Usage Limits   |   ParcelQuest.com Property Address: 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA CLARA CA 95050-4109 **The information provided here is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed. Additional reports on this property General Information
County: SANTA CLARA
Parcel # (APN): 224-49-006
Owner: See Full Detail
Mailing Address: 1400 PARKMOOR AVE #190 SAN JOSE CA 95126 Legal Description:

Use Type: VACANT
Tax Rate Area: 007-000
Assessment
Total Value: $12,225,356 Year Assd: 2021
Land: $12,225,356 Zoning: See Full Detail
Structures: Use Code: See Full Detail
Other: Census Tract: See Full Detail
% Improved: See Full Detail Price/SqFt: See Full Detail Exempt Amt:

HO Exempt: N
Sale History
Sale 1 Sale 2 Sale 3 Transfer
Document Date: 01/15/2020 See Full Detail See Full Detail See Full Detail Document Number: 24380714 See Full Detail See Full Detail See Full Detail Document Type: See Full Detail See Full Detail See Full Detail Transfer Amount: $12,100,000 See Full Detail See Full Detail Seller (Grantor): See Full Detail
Property Characteristics
Bedrooms: Fireplace: Units: See Full Detail
Baths (Full): A/C: See Full Detail Stories: See Full Detail Baths (Half): Heating: Quality: See Full Detail
Total Rooms: Pool: Building Class: See Full Detail
Bldg/Liv Area: 30,000 Park Type: Condition: See Full Detail Lot Acres: 1.410 Spaces: Site Influence:

Lot SqFt: 61,420 Garage SqFt: Timber Preserve:

Year Built: 1974 Ag Preserve:

Effective Year: See Full Detail
Full Detail $14.95

PLEASE NOTE: If a field is empty on this page, there is no data available, and the field will also be empty on the Full Detail property report.

DATA GAP WORKSHEET

DATA GAP WORKSHEET
Project or Property Name: Charities Housing – Santa Clara, CA Project Number: 575-1902

Requirement Status Other Sources of Information SDG*
Category
Activity
N/A
Complete
Incomplete
Reference Source(s) Obtained or
What Sources PSI Used to Try to Close Data Gap
Blank
if None
User Responsibilities
User Knowledge and Information

Environmental Lien and AUL Information

PSI Obtained Environmental Lien/AUL Search on
Behalf of Client (YES or NO) NO

PSI Obtained Chain-of-Title on Behalf of Client
(YES or NO) NO

Environmental Records Review
Standard
Environmental Records Source Information

Discretionary or Local
Environmental Records Source Information

Physical Setting Sources Review
Standard
Physical Setting Record Information (topo map)

Additional
Physical Setting Record Information

Historical Data Sources Review
Property History Identified to 1940

Property History Identified to First Developed Use
Based on research completed, not an issue.

Gaps of >5 Years in Historical Data Sources
Based on research completed, not an issue.

Surrounding Property History Information

DATA GAP WORKSHEET
Project or Property Name: Charities Housing – Santa Clara, CA Project Number: 575-1902

Requirement Status Other Sources of Information SDG*
Category
Activity
N/A
Complete
Incomplete
Reference Source(s) Obtained or
What Sources PSI Used to Try to Close Data Gap
Blank
if None
Site Reconnaissance
Observations:

Exterior areas of the Subject Property

Observations:

Interior of Buildings on the Subject Property

Current and Past Uses of the Subject Property

Observations:

Adjoining Property

Current and Past Uses of the Adjoining Property

Uses of the Surrounding Property

Interviews (with…)
Current Owner

Identified Key Site Manager

Non-Residential
Major Occupants

Occupants with Operations
Likely to Indicate RECs

Past Owners, Operators, and/or Occupants

If Subject Property Abandoned or Vacant,
Owner or Occupants of Neighboring Properties
Based on research completed, not an issue.

State or Local Government Official

DATA GAP WORKSHEET
Project or Property Name: Charities Housing – Santa Clara, CA Project Number: 575-1902

Requirement Status Other Sources of Information SDG*
Category
Activity
N/A
Complete
Incomplete
Reference Source(s) Obtained or
What Sources PSI Used to Try to Close Data Gap
Blank
if None
FOIAs (to…)
Comments and Explanations Regarding Incomplete Data

* SDG = Significant Data Gap. List Identified SDG(s) in Section 1.1.1 of the Report

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

RESUME
Kassandra O. Idowu
Professional Service Industries, Inc.

Environmental Scientist, Project Manager
Ms. Idowu joined Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) in 2018 as an Environmental Sci
entist.

Ms. Idowu has done work on the completion of Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) and Environmental Site Surveys. Report prepa
ration includes property reconnaissance; federal, state, and local regulatory agency review; property background searches into regional water quality control board records, property title histories, federal and state hazardous material files, as well as the review of aerial photographs, topographical maps, and other historical environmental data research.

Ms. Idowu has extensive hazardous material compliance management experience and superior knowledge of state and federal
regulations. Projects include emergency generator and hazardous material permitting as well as hazardous material inspections and plan reviews.

Ms. Idowu has also been a field technician involved in groundwater sampling for former UST sites in Northern California. Ms. Idowu undertakes the sample collection and assists in the completion of technical groundwater sampling reports for these projects.

R
epresentative Project Experience
JC Penney, Nationwide
Prepares and maintains the Hazardous Material Business Plans for over 75+ JC Penney locations in addition to managing the permitting for back-up generators . Liaison for JC Penney and their designated CUPAs throughout multiple counties.

Park Merced, San Francisco, California
Conducts quarterly hazardous material inspections and evaluation of the site and their Hazardous Material Business Plan.

Cathay Bank, Northern California
Completes various Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) and Environmental Site Surveys for different facilities throughout Northern California.

Hayward Unified School District, Hayward, California
Completes site audits and environmental review reports associated with the hazardous materials business program for over 30 school sites for Hayward Unified School District.

R.D. Olson Development, San Carlos, California
Conducts quarterly groundwater monitoring sampling for multiple monitoring wells associated with a Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups (SLIC) site.

Caliber Collision, California & Nevada
Completes various Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) and Environmental Site Surveys for primarily auto repair facilities throughout Northern California.

Sysco Corporation, Honolulu, Maui, and Kona Island, Hawaii Completed multiple Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and a Limited Environmental Compliance Review (LECR) for multiple properties located throughout Hawaii.

Education
Bachelor of Arts in Public
Health with a focus in
Environmental Health
Science at University of
California, Berkeley
Certification(s)
• EPA Certified Asbestos
Building Inspector –
#47707 IR
• NRPP
Certified
Residential
Measurement Provider
– 111218 RT

RESUME

Frank Poss, REA
Professional Service Industries, Inc.

Department Manager
Mr. Poss joined Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) in 1993 as a Department  Manager.  He  has  brought  with  him  33  years  of experience in the management of environmental site  assessments; groundwater  and  soil  remediation  projects;  hazardous  waste management; and subsurface investigation programs. His experience includes supervision of project and  staff level personnel, as well as subcontractors, implementation of QA/QC programs and Health and Safety  Programs,  contractual  negotiations,  and  budgetary management of projects  ranging from $20,000 to  over $1,000,000.

Mr. Poss has completed over  1,000 ESAs  in his career  and  as a Senior Reviewer, he has reviewed over 1,000 ESAs  from sites across the United States. He was the project manager for over  $2,000,000 of  work  for  Caltrans, including  projects  that  involved  wetlands studies,  preliminary  endangerment studies,  remedial  investigation, transportation  corridor  studies,  and  landfill  assessments.  The projects included work  throughout the State of California. Mr. Poss has  also  been  the  project manager  on  numerous  geotechnical investigations throughout Northern California with  projects ranging from  small  tilt  up  buildings  to multi‐s tory residential  buildings  to large distribution facilities.

Representative Project Experience
Environmental Site Assessments ‐ Citigroup, Northern California, California Project manager for over 400 Phase I/II ESA projects  associated with Citigroup branches  throughout the State of California. Mr. Poss was the manager for two separate portfolios of over 100 Citigroup branches each,  which had a quick  four‐week  turnaround with  all reports  delivered  on time. The  environmental assessments were completed according to standard protocol and included regulatory record review, site reconnaissance, aerial photograph interpretation, and report preparation.

Soil and Groundwater Studies ‐ State of California Department of Transportation, Bay Bridge, California Project manager for a  site investigation for CalTrans at  the “Maze” (the busiest freeway  intersection in Northern California) and the West  Approach to the Bay Bridge. The project was conducted as part of the seismic retrofit program. The project objective was to evaluate whether soil and groundwater generated during seismic retrofitting would be handled as a  hazardous waste. The project  included the drilling  of over 500 borings  and the analyses of  these samples for metals, volatile organics, semi‐volatile organics, and PCBs.

Preliminary Endangerment Study ‐ Westlake Realty, Foster City, California Project  manager for a  Preliminary  Endangerment  Study  for  the  DTS C f o r a n e w s c h o o l i n F o s t e r C i t y , California.  Multiple possible sources of impact at the property required the drilling of over 100 borings, 25 soil‐vapor samples, and 15 indoor air samples. The preparation  of a Human Health Risk Evaluation allowed PSI to obtain a partial site  closure, which allowed  construction to be completed while remedial activities on a release from a former dry cleaner were conducted.

Education
Master of Science in
Geology, San Diego State
University, 1986
Bachelor of Arts in Geology,
University of California,
Santa Barbara, 1983

Certifications
 Environmental Professional
– Phase I & II ESA, Project
Management, PSI

 Registered Environmental
Assessor, #REA05522,
California

 AHERA Asbestos Building
Inspector – #28719

 IAQ/Mold Inspector, PSI

Total Experience
33 years
Appendix E
Noi
se and Vibration Assessment
Civic Center Family Housing Project
In
itial Study
City of Santa Clara

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING

NOISE AND VIBRATION ASSESSMENT

Santa Clara, California

December 16, 2021

Prepared for:

Amber Sharpe
David J. Powers & Associates, Inc.
1871 The Alameda, Suite 200
San José, CA 95126

Prepared by:

Carrie J. Janello
Michael S. Thill

429 East Cotati Avenue
Cotati, CA 94931
(707) 794-0400

Project: 21-142

1 INTRODUCTION

A five-story affordable residential building is proposed at 1601 Civic Center Drive in Santa Clara, California. The site is currently developed with an existing two- story office building that would be demolished as part of the proposed project . The proposed affordable housing project would include up to 110 residential units and two managers’ unit s. The project would include a community room, offices that provide services to tenants, and surface and garage parking on the first floor.

This report evaluates the project’s potential to result in significant noise and vibration impacts with respect to applicable California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. The report is divided into three sections: 1) the Setting Section provides a brief description of the fundamentals of environmental noise and groundborne vibration, summarizes applicable regulatory background, and describes the existing ambient noise environment at the project site; 2) the Plan Consistency Analysis Section discusses noise a nd land use compatibility utilizing applicable regulatory background; and, 3) the Impacts and Mitigation Measures Section describes the significance criteria used to evaluate project impacts, provides a discussion of each project impact, and presents measures, where necessary, to mitigate the impacts of the project on sensitive receptors in the vicinity.

SETTING

Fundamentals of Environmental Noise

Noise may be defined as unwanted sound. Noise is usually objectionable because it is disturbing or annoying. The objectionable nature of sound could be caused by its pitch or its loudness. Pitch is the height or depth of a tone or sound, depending on the relative rapidity (frequency) of the vibrations by which it is produced. Higher pitched signals sound louder to humans than sounds with a lower pitch . Loudness is intensity of sound waves combined with the reception characteristics of the ear. Intensity may be compared with the height of an ocean wave in that it is a measure of the amplitude of the sound wave.

In addition to the concepts of pitch and loudness, there are several noise measurement scales which are used to describe noise in a particular location . A decibel (dB) is a unit of measurement which indicates the relative amplitude of a sound. The zero on the decibel scale is based on the lowest sound level that the healthy, unimpaired human ear can detect . Sound levels in decibels are calculated on a logarithmic basis . An increase of 10 decibels represents a ten -fold increase in acoustic energy, while 20 decibels is 100 times more intense, 30 decibels is 1,000 times more intense, etc. There is a relationship between the subjective noisiness or loudness of a sound and its intensity. Each 10 decibel increase in sound level is perceived as approximately a doubling of loudness over a fairly wide range of intensities. Technical terms are defined in Table 1.

There are several methods of characterizing sound . The most common in California is the A- weighted sound level (dBA). This scale gives greater weight to the frequencies of sound to which the human ear is most sensitive . Representative outdoor and indoor noise levels in units of dBA are shown in Table 2. Because sound levels can vary markedly over a short period of time, a

2 method for describing either the average character of the sound or the statistical behavior of the variations must be utilized . Most commonly, environmental sounds are described in terms of an average level that has the same acoustical energy as the summation of all the time-varying events.

This energy-equivalent sound/noise descriptor is called Leq. The most common averaging period is hourly, but Leq can describe any series of noise events of arbitrary duration.

The scientific instrument used to measure noise is the sound level meter. Sound level meters can accurately measure environmental noise levels to within about plus or minus 1 dBA . Various computer models are used to predict environmental noise levels from sources, such as roadways and airports. The accuracy of the predicted models depends upon the distance the receptor is from the noise source. Close to the noise source, the models are accurate to within about plus or minus 1 to 2 dBA.

Since the sensitivity to noise increases during the evening and at night -- because excessive noise interferes with the ability to sleep -- 24-hour descriptors have been developed that incorporate artificial noise penalties added to quiet-time noise events. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is a measure of the cumulative noise exposure in a community, with a 5 dB penalty added to evening (7:00 pm - 10:00 pm) and a 10 dB addition to nocturnal (10:00 pm - 7:00 am) noise levels. The Day/Night Average Sound Level (L
dn or DNL) is essentially the same as CNEL, with
the exception that the evening time period is dropped and all occurrences during this three -hour period are grouped into the daytime period.

Effects of Noise

Sleep and Speech Interference

The thresholds for speech interference indoors are about 45 dBA if the noise is steady and above 55 dBA if the noise is fluctuating. Outdoors the thresholds are about 15 dBA higher. Steady noises of sufficient intensity (above 35 dBA) and fluctuating noise levels above about 45 dBA have been shown to affect sleep. Interior residential standards for multi-family dwellings are set by the State of California at 45 dBA L
dn. Typically, the highest steady traffic noise level during the daytime is about equal to the Ldn and nighttime levels are 10 dBA lower. The standard is designed for sleep and speech protection and most jurisdictions apply the same criterion for all residential uses.

Typical structural attenuation is 12 -17 dBA with open windows. With closed windows in good condition, the noise attenuation factor is around 20 dBA for an older structure and 25 dBA for a newer dwelling. Sleep and speech interference is therefore possible when exterior noise levels are about 57-62 dBA L
dn with open windows and 65-70 dBA Ldn if the windows are closed. Levels of 55-60 dBA are common along collector streets and secondary arterials, while 65- 70 dBA is a typical value for a primary/major arterial. Levels of 75-80 dBA are normal noise levels at the first row of development outside a freeway right -of-way. In order to achieve an acceptable interior noise environment, bedrooms facing secondary roadways need to be able to have their windows closed; those facing major roadways and freeways typically need special glass windows.

3 Annoyance

Attitude surveys are used for measuring the annoyance felt in a community for noises intruding into homes or affecting outdoor activity areas. In these surveys, it was determined that the causes for annoyance include interference with speech, radio and television, house vibrations, and interference with sleep and rest. The L
dn as a measure of noise has been found to provide a valid correlation of noise level and the percentage of people annoyed. People have been asked to judge the annoyance caused by aircraft noise and ground transportation noise. There continues to be disagreement about the relative annoyance of these different sources. When measuring the percentage of the population highly annoyed, the threshold for ground vehicle noise is about 50 dBA L
dn. At a Ldn of about 60 dBA, approximately 12 percent of the population is highly annoyed.

When the Ldn increases to 70 dBA, the percentage of the population highly annoyed increases to about 25-30 percent of the population. There is, therefore, an increase of about 2 percent per dBA between a L
dn of 60-70 dBA. Between a Ldn of 70-80 dBA, each decibel increase increases by about 3 percent the percentage of the population highly annoyed. People appear to respond more adversely to aircraft noise. When the L
dn is 60 dBA, approximately 30-35 percent of the population is believed to be highly annoyed. Each decibel increase to 70 dBA adds about 3 percentage points to the number of people highly annoyed. Above 70 dBA, each decibel increase results in about a 4 percent increase in the percentage of the population highly annoyed.

Fundamentals of Groundborne Vibration

Ground vibration consists of rapidly fluctuating motions or waves with an average motion of zero.

Several different methods are typically used to quantify vibration amplitude. One method is the Peak Particle Velocity (PPV). The PPV is defined as the maximum instantaneous positive or negative peak of the vibration wave. In this report, a PPV descriptor with units of mm/sec or in/sec is used to evaluate construction generated vibration for building damage and human complaints.

Table 3 displays the reactions of people and the effects on buildings that continuous or frequent intermittent vibration levels produce. The guidelines in Table 3 represent syntheses of vibration criteria for human response and potential damage to buildings resulting from construction vibration.

Construction activities can cause vibration that varies in intensity depending on several factors.

The use of pile driving and vibratory compaction equipment typically generates the highest construction related groundborne vibration levels. Because of the impulsive nature of such activities, the use of the PPV descriptor has been routinely used to measure and assess groundborne vibration and almost exclusively to assess the potential of vibration to cause damage and the degree of annoyance for humans.

The two primary concerns with construction-induced vibration, the potential to damage a structure and the potential to interfere with the enjoyment of life, are evaluated against different vibration limits. Human perception to vibration varies with the individual and is a function of physical setting and the type of vibration. Persons exposed to elevated ambient vibration levels, such as people in an urban environment, may tolerate a higher vibration level.

4 Structural damage can be classified as cosmetic only, such as paint flaking or minimal extension of cracks in building surfaces; minor, including limited surface cracking ; or major , that may threaten the structural integrity of the building. Safe vibration limits that can be applied to assess the potential for damaging a structure vary by researcher. The damage criteria presented in Table 3 include several categories for ancient, fragile, and historic structures, the types of structures most at risk to damage. Most buildings are included within the categories ranging from “Historic and some old buildings” to “Modern industrial/commercial buildings”. Construction-induced vibration that can be detrimental to the building is very rare and has only been observed in instances where the structure is at a high state of disrepair and the construction activity occurs immediately adjacent to the structure.

The annoyance levels shown in Table 3 should be interpreted with care since vibration may be found to be annoying at lower levels than those shown, depending on the level of activity or the sensitivity of the individual. To sensitive individuals, vibrations approaching the threshold of perception can be annoying. Low-level vibrations frequently cause irritating secondary vibration, such as a slight rattling of windows, doors, or stacked dishes. The rattling sound can give rise to exaggerated vibration complaints, even though there is very little risk of actual structural damage.

5 TABLE 1 Definition of Acoustical Terms Used in this Report Term Definition
Decibel, dB A unit describing, the amplitude of sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure. The reference pressure for air is 20 micro Pascals.

Sound Pressure Level Sound pressure is the sound force per unit area, usually expressed in micro Pascals (or 20 micro Newtons per square meter), where 1 Pascal is the pressure resulting from a force of 1 Newton exerted over an area of 1 square meter. The sound pressure level is expressed in decibels as 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio between the pressures exerted by the sound to a reference sound pressure (e. g., 20 micro Pascals). Sound pressure level is the quantity that is directly measured by a sound leve l meter.

Frequency, Hz The number of complete pressure fluctuations per second above and below atmospheric pressure. Normal human hearing is between 20 Hz and 20,000 Hz. Infrasonic sound are below 20 Hz and Ultrasonic sounds are above 20,000 Hz.

A-Weighted Sound
Level, dBA
The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighting filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency response of the human ear and correlates well with subjective reactions to noise.

Equivalent Noise Level,
Leq
The average A-weighted noise level during the measurement period.

Lmax, Lmin The maximum and minimum A -weighted noise level during the measurement period.

L01, L10, L50, L90 The A-weighted noise levels that are exceeded 1%, 10%, 50%, and 90% of the time during the measurement period.

Day/Night Noise Level,
Ldn or DNL
The average A -weighted noise level during a 24 -hour day, obtained after addition of 10 decibels to levels measured in the night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.

Community Noise
Equivalent Level,
CNEL
The average A -weighted noise level during a 24 -hour day, obtained after addition of 5 decibels in the evening from 7:00 p.m.to 10:00 p.m. and after addition of 10 decibels to sound levels measured in the night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.

Ambient Noise Level The composite of noise from all sources near and far. The normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location.

Intrusive That noise which intrudes over and above the existing ambient noise at a given location. The relative intrusiveness of a sound depends upon its amplitude, duration, frequency, and time of occurrence and tonal or informational content as well as the prevailing ambient noise level.

Source: Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control, Harris, 1998.

6 TABLE 2 Typical Noise Levels in the Environment

Common Outdoor Activities

Noise Level (dBA)

Common Indoor Activities
110 dBA Rock band
Jet fly-over at 1,000 feet
100 dBA
Gas lawn mower at 3 feet
90 dBA
Diesel truck at 50 feet at 50 mph Food blender at 3 feet 80 dBA Garbage disposal at 3 feet
Noisy urban area, daytime
Gas lawn mower, 100 feet 70 dBA Vacuum cleaner at 10 feet Commercial area Normal speech at 3 feet
Heavy traffic at 300 feet 60 dBA
Large business office
Quiet urban daytime 50 dBA Dishwasher in next room

Quiet urban nighttime 40 dBA Theater, large conference room Quiet suburban nighttime
30 dBA Library
Quiet rural nighttime Bedroom at night, concert hall
(background)
20 dBA
Broadcast/recording studio
10 dBA
0 dBA
Source: Technical Noise Supplement (TeNS), California Department of Transportation, September 2013.

7 TABLE 3 Reaction of People and Damage to Buildings from Continuous or Frequent Intermittent Vibration Levels
Velocity Level,
PPV (in/sec) Human Reaction Effect on Buildings

0.01 Barely perceptible No effect

0.04 Distinctly perceptible Vibration unlikely to cause damage of any type to any structure

0.08 Distinctly perceptible to
strongly perceptible
Recommended upper level of the vibration to which
ruins and ancient monuments should be subjected

0.1 Strongly perceptible Threshold at which there is a risk of damage to fragile buildings with no risk of damage to most buildings

0.25 Strongly perceptible to severe Threshold at which there is a risk of damage to historic and some old buildings.

0.3 Strongly perceptible to severe Threshold at which there is a risk of damage to older residential structures

0.5 Severe – Vibrations considered
unpleasant
Threshold at which there is a risk of damage to new
residential and modern commercial/industrial structures Source: Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, California Department of Transportation, April 2020.

Regulatory Background – Noise

The State of California and the City of Santa Clara have established noise criteria, and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) have established vibration criteria, that are applicable in this assessment . T he State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Appendix G, are used to assess the potential significance of impacts pursuant to local General Plan policies, Municipal Code standards, or the applicable standards of other agencies. A summary of the applicable regulatory criteria is provided below.

Federal

2018 Federal Transit Administration’s Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual.

The Federal Transit Administration’s (FDA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual includes general assessment criteria for construction noise. During daytime hours, the hourly average noise level limit is 90 dBA L
eq at residential land uses and 100 dBA L eq at
commercial and industrial land uses. Nighttime limits are 80 dBA Leq at residential land uses and 100 dBA Leq at commercial and industrial land uses.

State of California

State CEQA Guidelines. CEQA contains guidelines to evaluate the significance of effects of environmental noise attributable to a proposed project. Under CEQA, noise impacts would be considered significant if the project would result in:

8 (a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local General Plan or Noise Ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies;

(b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels; or

(c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, if the project would expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels.

2019 California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2. The current version of the California Building Code (CBC) requires interior noise levels in multi-family residential units attributable to exterior environmental noise sources to be limited to a level not exceeding 45 dBA L dn/CNEL in any
habitable room.

Local

City of Santa Clara General Plan . The City of Santa Clara’s General Plan identifies noise and land use compatibility standards for various land uses and establishes policies to control noise within the community . Table 5.10- 2 from the General Plan shows acceptable noise levels for various land uses. Commercial land uses are considered compatible in noise en vironments of 65 dBA L
dn/CNEL or less. The guidelines state that where the exterior noise levels are greater than 65 dBA L dn/CNEL and less than 75 dBA L dn/CNEL, the design of the project should include measures to reduce noise levels to acceptable levels. Noise levels exceeding 75 dBA Ldn/CNEL at commercial land uses are considered incompatible.

Applicable goals and policies presented in the General Plan are as follows:

5.10.6-G1 Noise sources restricted to minimize impacts in the community.

5.10.6-G2 Sensitive uses protected from noise intrusion.

TABLE 5.10-2: GENERAL PLAN NOISE STANDARDS
Noise and L
Land Use 85
Residential
Educational
Recreational
Commercial
Industrial

9 5.10.6-G3 Land use, development and design approvals that take noise levels into consideration.

5.10.6-P1 Review all land use and development proposals for consistency with the General Plan compatibility standards and acceptable noise exposure levels defined on Table

5.10-1.

5.10.6-P2 Incorporate noise attenuation measures for all projects that have noise exposure levels greater than General Plan “normally acceptable” levels, as defined on Table

5.10-1.

5.10.6-P3 New development should include noise control techniques to reduce noise to acceptable levels, including site layout (setbacks, separation and shielding), building treatments (mechanical ventilatio n system, sound- rated windows, solid core doors and baffling) and structural measures (earthen berms and sound walls).

5.10.6-P4 Encourage the control of noise at the source through site design, building design, landscaping, hours of operation and other techniques.

5.10.6-P5 Require noise-generating uses near residential neighborhoods to include solid walls and heavy landscaping along common property lines, and to place compressors and mechanical equipment in sound-proof enclosures.

5.10.6-P6 Discourage noise sensitive uses, such as residences, hospitals, schools, libraries and rest homes, from areas with high noise levels, and discourage high noise generating uses from areas adjacent to sensitive uses.

5.10.6-P7 Implement measures to reduce interior noise levels and restrict outdoor activities in areas subject to aircraft noise in order to make Offi ce/Research and Development uses compatible with the Norman Y. Mineta International Airport land use restrictions.

City of Santa Clara Municipal Code . The City ’s Municipal Code establishes noise level performance standards for fixed sources of noise. Section 9.10.40 of the Municipal Code limits noise levels at commercial office buildings to 65 dBA during daytime hours (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and 60 dBA at night (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.). The noise limits are not applicable to emergency work, licensed outdoor events, City- owned electric, water, and sewer utility system facilities, construction activities occurring with in allowable hours, permitted fireworks displays, or permitted heliports . Construction activities are not permitted within 300 feet of residentially zoned property except within the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No construction is permitted on Sundays or holidays.

The City Code does not define the acoustical time descriptor such as L eq (the average noise level)
or L max (the maximum instantaneous noise level) that is associated with the above limits . A reasonable interpretation of the City Code would identify the ambient base noise level criteria as an average or median noise level (L
eq/L50).

10 Regulatory Background – Vibration

California Department of Transportation . To avoid damage to buildings, Caltrans recommends that construction vibration levels are limited to 0.5 in/sec PPV for buildings structurally sound and designed to modern engineering standards, to 0.3 in/sec PPV for buildings that are found to be structurally sound but w here structural damage is a major concern, and to 0.08 in/sec PPV for ancient buildings or buildings that are documented to be structurally weakened (see Table 3).

11 Existing Noise Environment

The project site is located northwest of the Civic Center Drive and Lincoln Street intersection in the City of Santa Clara. Currently, a small vacant office building occupies the site. The site is bound by Civic Center Drive to the south, Lincoln Street to the east, single-family residences to the west, and a church to the north. Existing commercial uses and a hotel are located to the south, opposite Civic Center Drive, and the Civic Center buildings are located to the east, opposite Lincoln Street.

The noise environment at the site and in the surrounding are as results primarily from vehicular traffic along
Civic Center Drive and Lincoln Street. Nearby El Camino Real and aircraft associated with Mineta San José International Airport affects the noise environment also contribute to the noise environment.

A noise monitoring survey, which included one long-term and two short-term noise measurements, was performed at the site beginning on Wednesday September 29, 2021 and concluding on Friday October 1 , 2021. Additionally, a second long- term measurement was made at the project site beginning on Friday November 19, 2021 and concluding on Wednesday November 24, 2021. All measurement locations are shown in Figure 1.

Long-term noise measurement LT-1 was made approximately 30 feet from the centerline of Civic Center Drive and approximately 255 feet from the centerline of Lincoln Street . Hourly average noise levels at LT-1 typically ranged from 51 to 58 dBA L eq during the day and from 45 to 55 dBA
Leq at night. The average community noise equivalent level (CNEL) for 24-hour periods occurring between Wednesday September 29, 2021 and Friday October 1, 2021 was 58 dBA CNEL. The daily trends in noise levels at LT -1 are shown in Figures A1 through A3 in the Appendix of this report.

LT-2 was made approximately 40 feet from the centerline of Lincoln Street and approximately 75 feet from the centerline of Civic Center Drive. Hourly average noise levels at LT-2 typically ranged from 55 to 61 dBA L
eq during the day and from 48 to 59 dBA Leq at night on weekdays. On weekends, typical hourly average noise levels ranged from 55 to 60 dBA Leq during the day and from 47 to 58 dBA Leq at night. The average CNEL was 62 dBA on weekdays and ranged from 60 to 61 dBA on weekends. The daily trends in noise levels at LT-2 are shown in Figures A4 through A9 in the Appendix of this report.

Both short-term noise measurements were made on Wednesday September 29, 2021 in 10-minute intervals between 11: 40 a.m. and 11:50 a.m. ST-1 was made in the northwestern corner of the project site, approximately 245 feet north of the centerline of Civic Center Drive and approximately 285 feet west of the centerline of Lincoln Street . During this measurement, 14 passenger cars drove by along Lincoln Street, generating noise levels at ST -1 ranging from 45 to 50 dBA. Aircraft were observed to produce noise levels of 48 to 55 dBA, as well. Additionally, a nearby neighbor slammed their car door, generating noise levels up to 62 dBA. The 10- minute average noise level at ST-1 was 45 dBA L
eq(10-min).

12 ST-2 was made along the sidewalk at the backyard equivalent location of 1690 Triton Court , approximately 20 feet from the centerline of Civic Center Drive . Vehicles along Civic Center Drive during this 10-minute period generated noise levels of 48 to 50 dBA, and a noisy scooter generated noise levels up to 61 dBA. The maximum noise level of 74 dBA was due to a barking dog. The 10-minute average noise level at ST-2 was 54 dBA Leq(10-min).

Table 4 summarizes the results of the 10-minute noise measurements made at ST-1 and ST-2.

TABLE 4 Summary of Short- Term Noise Measurement Data (dBA) Noise Measurement Location
(Date, Time) Lmax L(1) L(10) L(50) L(90) Leq(10)
ST-1: northwest corner of project site
(9/29/2021, 11:40-11:50 a.m.) 62 54 47 43 42 45
ST-2: backyard equivalent of 1690 Triton
Court, ~20 feet from the centerline of Civic
Center Drive
(9/29/2021, 11:40-11:50 a.m.)
74 67 55 43 40 54

13 FIGURE 1 Noise Measurement Locations

14 PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS

Noise and Land Use Compatibility

Noise levels in outdoor use areas that are affected by transportation noise are required to be maintained at or below 55 dBA CNEL to be considered normally acceptable for residential land uses, according to the City’s General Plan. Additionally, residential interior noise levels are required to meet the performance standard of 45 dBA CNEL.

The future noise environment at the project site would continue to be dominated by traffic along Lincoln Street and other local roadways surrounding the site. A traffic study was not completed for the proposed project; however , peak trips were estimated to be 40 during the peak AM hour and 42 during the peak PM hour. Based on the low existing traffic volumes along Civic Center Drive and Lincoln Street, these peak hour trips would result in 1 dBA CNEL increase under project conditions. Additionally, a conservative 1% to 2% increase in traffic volumes each year for the next 20 years was assumed for standard traffic volume increase in a developed area. With the project trips, the total increase by the year 2040 would be about 2 dBA CNEL at the project site.

Future Exterior Noise Environment

The project’s site plan shows two outdoor use areas intended for common use: 1) open space with seating located on the ground level adjacent to Lincoln Street; and 2) a level 2 podium courtyard located on the interior of the site.

The open space would have direct line-of-sight to traffic noise along Lincoln Street, and the center of this open space would be set back approximately 85 feet from the centerline of the roadway.

Due to the angle of the proposed buildings, the center of the open space would be partially shielded by the building façades. The future exterior noise levels at the center of the open court would be 60 dBA CNEL, which would exceed the City’s 55 dBA CNEL threshold for residential land uses by 5 dBA.

The podium courtyard located on level 2 would receive partial shielding from the north and south sections of the residential building, the upper-floor walkways connecting the two building sections, and the elevation of the courtyard above the ground. The center of the courtyard would be approximately 215 feet from the center of Lincoln Street . At this distance and assuming partial shielding, future exterior noise levels would be below 55 dBA CNEL.

While the common outdoor use area facing Lincoln Street would exceed the City’s exterior noise limits for residential uses , the purpose of this outdoor area is to be an open seating area. The incorporation of a barrier fence or sound wall would obscure the view of this open area and diminish the aesthetic appeal. Further, the future exterior noise levels at the open space would fall within the City’s conditionally acceptable threshold. Since the podium courtyard falls within the City’s normally acceptable threshold and the open space falls within the conditionally acceptable threshold, no additional measures are recommended to reduce future exterior noise levels at the open space, assuming conditionally acceptable approval is obtained from the City of Santa Clara.

15 Future Interior Noise Environment

Standard residential construction provides approximately 15 dBA of exterior -to-interior noise reduction, assuming the windows are partially open for ventilation. Standard construction with the windows closed provides approximately 20 to 25 dBA of noise reduction in interior spaces. Where exterior noise levels range from 60 to 65 dBA CNEL, the inclusion of adequate forced -air mechanical ventilation is often the method selected to reduce interior noise levels to acceptable levels by closing the windows to control noise. Where noise levels exceed 65 dBA CNEL, forced- air mechanical ventilation systems and sound -rated construction methods are normally required.

Such methods or materials may include a combination of smaller window and door sizes as a percentage of the total building façade facing the noise source, sound -rated windows and doors, sound rated exterior wall assemblies, and mechanical ventilation so windows may be kept closed at the occupant’s discretion.

Residential units located along the eastern building façades would be set back approximately 60 to 105 feet from the centerline of Lincoln Street. At these distances, the units with direct line-of- sight to Lincoln Street would be exposed to future exterior noise levels up to 62 dBA CNEL.

Assuming windows to be partially open, future interior noise levels in these units would be up to 47 dBA CNEL.

Units along the southern façade of the southern building would have direct line-of-sight to Civic Center Drive, with setbacks of approximately 50 feet from the centerline. At this distance, the units facing Civic Center Drive would be exposed to future exterior noise levels would of up to 57 dBA CNEL. Assuming windows to be partially open, future interior noise levels in these units would of 42 dBA CNEL.

To meet the inter ior noise requirements set forth by the State of California of 45 dBA CNEL, standard construction materials would be sufficient with the incorporation of forced-air mechanical ventilation, as determined by the local building official. This would allow occupants on the project site to keep windows closed to control interior noise and achieve the interior noise standards.

NOISE IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

Significance Criteria

The following criteria were used to evaluate the significance of environmental noise resulting from the project:

• A significant noise impact would be identified if the project would generate a substantial temporary or permanent noise level increase over ambient noise levels at existing noise - sensitive receptors surrounding the project site and that would exceed applicable noise standards presented in the General Plan or Municipal Code at existing noise -sensitive receptors surrounding the project site.

16 o Hourly average noise levels during construction that would exceed 90 dBA Leq at residential land uses or exceed 100 dBA L eq at commercial land uses would constitute a significant temporary noise increase in the project vicinity.

o A s ignificant permanent noise level increase would occur if project-generated traffic generated by the project or project improvements/operations would substantially increase noise levels at sensitive receivers in the vicinity. A substantial increase would occur if: a) the noise level increase is 5 dBA CNEL or greater, with a future noise level of less than the “normally acceptable” standard, or b) the noise level increase is 3 dBA CNEL or greater, with a future noise level equal to or greater than the “normally acceptable” standard.

o A significant noise impact would be identified if the project would expose persons to or generate noise levels that would exceed applicable noise standards presented in the General Plan or Municipal Code.

• A significant impact would be identified if the construction of the project would generate excessive vibration levels surrounding receptors. Groundborne vibration levels exceeding

0.3 in/sec PPV would have the potential to result in cosmetic damage to normal buildings.

• A significant noise impact would be identified if the project would expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive aircraft noise levels.

Impact 1a: Temporary Construction Noise . Existing noise -sensitive land uses would be exposed to a temporary increase in ambient noise levels due to project construction activities. The incorporation of construction best management practices as project conditions of approval would result in a less-than-significant temporary noise impact.

Noise impacts resulting from construction depend upon the noise generated by various pieces of construction equipment, the timing and duration of noise -generating activities, and the distance between construction noise sources and noise -sensitive areas. Construction noise impac ts primarily result when construction activities occur during noise -sensitive times of the day (e.g., early morning, evening, or nighttime hours), the construction occurs in areas immediately adjoining noise-sensitive land uses, or when construction lasts over extended periods of time.

The City’s Municipal Code limits construction activities (including the loading and unloading of materials and truck movements) within 300 feet of residentially zoned property to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays.

No construction is permitted on Sundays or holidays.

While noise thresholds for temporary construction are not provided in the City’s General Plan or Municipal Code, the Federal Transit Administration (FDA) includes daytime construction noise limits in the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual from 2018. 1 During daytime

1 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, FTA Report No. 0123, September 2018.

17 hours, an exterior threshold of 90 dBA Leq shall be enforced at residential land uses and 100 dBA Leq at commercial and industrial land uses. Therefore, the temporary construction noise impact would be considered significant if project construction activities produced noise levels exceeding 90 dBA Leq at residential land uses or 100 dBA Leq at commercial land uses surrounding the site.

Construction activities generate considerable amounts of noise, especially during earth-moving activities when heavy equipment is used. The typical range of maximum instantaneous noise levels for the proposed project would be 70 to 90 dBA L
max at a distance of 50 feet (see Table 5). Table
6 shows typical hourly average construction-generated noise levels measured at a distance of 50 feet from the center of the site during busy construction periods (e.g., earth moving equipment, impact tools, etc.). As shown in Table 6, typical residential buildings generate construction noise levels ranging from 72 to 88 dBA L
eq at a distance of 50 feet from the center of the active site.

Construction-generated noise levels drop off at a rate of about 6 dBA per doubling of the distance between the source and receptor. Shielding by buildings or terrain often result in lower construction noise levels at distant receptors; however, for purposes of assessing a worst -case scenario, construction noise levels in this report are estimated assuming no attenuation due to intervening buildings or structures.

Construction for the proposed project is expected to last for approximately 17 months.

Construction activities for the proposed project would be completed in phases. During each phase of construction, there would be a different mix of equipment operating, and noise levels would vary by phase and vary within phases, based on the amount of equipment in operation and the location at which the equipment is operating. Equipment expected to be used in each construction phase are summarized in Table 7, along with the quantity of each piece of equipment, the duration of each phase, and the estimated noise levels projected from the center of the project site to the property lines of the surrounding land uses. For the purposes of assuming worst -case conditions, all pieces of equipment shown per phase are assumed to be operating simultaneously. The range of levels shown for various phases represents noise levels for that individual phase and noise levels during the overlapping periods with other phases.

FHWA’s Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) was used to calculate the hourly average noise levels for each phase of construction, assuming every piece of equipment would operate simultaneously, which would represent the worst-case scenario. Based on the hourly average noise levels calculated with RCNM, construction noise levels for each construction phase were propagated from the center of the project site, which represents the geometrical center of the active construction site, to the property lines of the receiving land uses surrounding the site.

18 TABLE 5 Construction Equipment, 50-foot Noise Emission Limits Equipment Category Lmax Level (dBA)1,2 Impact/Continuous Arc Welder
Auger Drill Rig
Backhoe
Bar Bender
Boring Jack Power Unit
Chain Saw
Compressor
3 Compressor (other)
Concrete Mixer
Concrete Pump
Concrete Saw
Concrete Vibrator
Crane
Dozer
Excavator
Front End Loader
Generator
Generator (25 KVA or less)
Gradall
Grader
Grinder Saw
Horizontal Boring Hydro Jack
Hydra Break Ram
Impact Pile Driver
Insitu Soil Sampling Rig
Jackhammer
Mounted Impact Hammer (hoe ram)
Paver
Pneumatic Tools
Pumps
Rock Drill
Scraper
Slurry Trenching Machine
Soil Mix Drill Rig
Street Sweeper
Tractor
Truck (dump, delivery)
Vacuum Excavator Truck (vac-truck)
Vibratory Compactor
Vibratory Pile Driver
All other equipment with engines larger than 5 HP
73 85
80 80
80 85
70 80
85 82
90 80
85 85
85 80
82 70
85 85
85 80
90 105
84 85
90 85
85 77
85 85
82 80
80 84
84 85
80 95
85 Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Impact
Impact
Continuous
Impact
Impact
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Notes: 1 Measured at 50 feet from the construction equipment, with a “slow” (1 sec.) time constant. 2 Noise limits apply to total noise emitted from equipment and associated components operating at full power while engaged in its intended operation.
3Portable Air Compressor rated at 75 cfm or greater and that operates at greater than 50 psi.

19 TABLE 6 Typical Ranges of Construction Noise Levels at 50 Feet, L eq (dBA)

Domestic Housing

Office Building,
Hotel, Hospital,
School, Public
Works
Industrial Parking
Garage, Religious
Amusement &
Recreations, Store,
Service Station

Public Works
Roads & Highways,
Sewers, and
Trenches

I II I II I II I II
Ground
Clearing

83 83

84 84

84 83

84 84

Excavation

88 75

89 79

89 71

88 78

Foundations

81 81

78 78

77 77

88 88

Erection

81 65

87 75

84 72

79 78

Finishing

88 72

89 75

89 74

84 84
I – All pertinent equipment present at site.

II – Minimum required equipment present at site.

Source: U.S.E.P.A., Legal Compilation on Noise, Vol. 1, p. 2-104, 1973.

20 TABLE 7 Estimated Construction Noise Levels at Nearby Land Uses Phase Phase
Duration
Construction Equipment
(Quantity)
Calculated Hourly Average Leq at Noise-Sensitive Receptors, dBA West Residences
(130 feet)
North Church
(110 feet)
South Hotel &
Commercial
(180 feet)
East Civic Buildings
(230 feet)
Demolition 9/1/2023-
10/1/2023
Concrete/Industrial Saw (1)
Excavator (2)
Rubber-Tired Dozer (1)
Tractor/Loader/Backhoe (1)
78 dBA Leq 80 dBA Leq 75 dBA Leq 73 dBA Leq
Site
Preparation
10/1/2023-
11/1/2023
Grader (1)
Rubber-Tired Dozer (1)
Tractor/Loader/Backhoe (1)
76 dBA Leq 78 dBA Leq 73 dBA Leq 71 dBA Leq
Grading/
Excavation
11/1/2023-
12/1/2023
Excavator (2)
Grader (2)
Rubber-Tired Dozer (1)
Tractor/Loader/Backhoe (1)
79 dBA Leq 80 dBA Leq 76 dBA Leq 74 dBA Leq
Trenching/
Foundation
12/1/2023-
1/1/2024
Tractor/Loader/Backhoe (1)
Excavator (1) 73 dBA Leq 75 dBA Leq 71 dBA Leq 68 dBA Leq Building
Exterior
1/1/2024-
8/1/2024
Crane (1)
Forklift (2)
Generator Set (1)
Welder (1)
72 dBA Leq 73 dBA Leq 69 dBA Leq 67 dBA Leq
Building
Interior/
Architectural
Coating
8/11/2024-
1/11/2025 Aerial Lift (2) 62 dBA Leq 64 dBA Leq 60 dBA Leq 58 dBA Leq Paving 1/11/2025-
2/1/2025
Paver (1)
Paving Equipment (1)
Roller (1)
75 dBA Leq 77 dBA Leq 72 dBA Leq 70 dBA Leq

21 The predicted construction noise levels in Table 7 indicate that project construction would not generate noise levels exceeding 90 dBA Leq at the nearby residential uses or 100 dBA L eq at the nearby commercial uses . Therefore, extended exposure to excessive construction noise at the nearest noise-sensitive receptors would be less-than-significant.

Reasonable regulation of the hours of construction, as well as regulation of the arrival and operation of heavy equipment and the delivery of construction material, are necessary to protect the health and safety of persons, promote the general welfare of the community, and maintain the quality of life. The construction crew shall adhere to the following construction best management practices to reduce construction noise levels emanating from the site and minimize disruption and annoyance at existing noise-sensitive receptors in the project vicinity. The incorporation of construction best management practices as project conditions of approval would result in a less -than-significant temporary noise impact.

Construction Best Management Practices

Develop a construction noise control plan, including, but not limited to, the following available controls:

• Ensure that excavating, grading and filling activities, and other construction activities (including the loading and unloading of materials and truck movements) within 300 feet of residentially zoned property, including hotel properties, are limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No construction is permitted on Sundays or holidays.

• Construct temporary noise barriers, where feasible, to screen stationary noise -generating equipment. Temporary noise barrier fences would provide a 5 dBA noise reduction if the noise barrier interrupts the line -of-sight between the noise source and receptor and if the barrier is constructed in a manner that eliminates any cracks or gaps.

• Equip all internal combustion engine -driven equipment with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment.

• Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines should be strictly prohibited.

• Locate stationary noise-generating equipment, such as air compressors or portable power generators, as far as possible from sensitive receptors as feasible. If they must be located near receptors, adequate muffling (with enclosures where feasible and appropriate) shall be used to reduce noise levels at the adjacent sensitive receptors. Any enclosure openings or venting shall face away from sensitive receptors.

• Utilize "quiet" air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists.

• Construction staging areas shall be established at locations that will create the greatest distance between the construction- related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.

22 • Locate material stockpiles, as well as maintenance/equipment staging and parking areas, as far as feasible from residential receptors.

• Route construction- related traffic along major roadways and as far as feasible from sensitive receptors.

• Control noise from construction workers’ radios to a point where they are not audible at existing residences bordering the project site.

• The contractor shall prepare a detailed construction schedule for major noise -generating construction activities. The construction plan shall identify a procedure for coordination with adjacent residential land uses so that construction activities can be scheduled to minimize noise disturbance.

• Designate a "disturbance coordinator" who would be responsible for responding to any complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator will determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., bad muffler, etc.) and will require that reasonable measures be implemented to correct the problem. Conspicuously post a telephone number for the disturbance coordinator at the construction site and include in it the notice sent to neighbors regarding the construction schedule.

Implementation of the above measures would reduce construction noise levels emanating from the site, limit construction ho urs, and minimize disruption and annoyance. With the implementation of these measures as project conditions of approval and recognizing that noise generated by construction activities would occur over a temporary period, the temporary increase in ambient noise levels would result in a less-than-significant impact.

Mitigation Measure 1a: No further mitigation necessary.

Impact 1b: Permanent Noise Level Increase. The proposed project would not result in a substantial permanent noise level increase due to project -generated traffic at the existing noise -sensitive land uses in the project vicinity. This is a less- than- significant impact.

A significant impact would oc cur if the permanent noise level increase due to project -generated traffic was 3 dBA CNEL or greater for future ambient noise levels exceeding 60 dBA CNEL or was 5 dBA CNEL or greater for future ambient noise levels at or below 60 dBA CNEL. Existing ambient measurements made in the project site vicinity indicate that existing and future ambient noise levels at the noise-sensitive receptors in the project site vicinity would result in noise levels over 60 dBA CNEL. Therefore, a significant impact would occur if project -generated traffic increased levels by 3 dBA CNEL or more. For reference, a 3 dBA CNEL noise increase would be expected if the project would double existing traffic volumes along a roadway.

A traffic study was not required for the proposed project; however, peak hour trips were estimated to be 40 during the peak AM hour and 42 during the peak PM hour. Compared to the existing volumes along the surrounding roadways, these peak hour trips would result in a 1 dBA CNEL

23 increase under project conditions. 2 Therefore, the project -generated traffic would not cause a substantial permanent noise increase at the surrounding noise-sensitive receptors. This impact is a less-than-significant impact.

Mitigation Measure 1b: None required.

Impact 1c: Noise Levels in Excess of Standards. The proposed project is not expected to exceed the City’s residential or commercial noise thresholds at the existing land uses surrounding the project site. This is a less-than-significant impact.

Under the City of Santa Clara Municipal Code, noise generated by fixed sources of noise would be restricted to 55 dBA during daytime hours (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and to 50 dBA during nighttime hours (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) at residentially zoned land uses. At existing commercial land uses, noise would be restricted to 65 dBA during daytime hours and to 60 dBA during nighttime hours.

The roof plan for the proposed building shows solar thermal arrays and photovoltaic arrays, which would not generate measurable noise levels at the property lines of the project site. While the site plan also shows a heat room on the ground floor, which would likely house heating pumps for the building, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems (HVAC units) are not shown on the site plan. However, these types of units were recommended to reduce noise levels at residential interiors by closing the windows; therefore, these units are studied here as potential noise - generating equipment. Assuming worst-case conditions, the HVAC units are assumed to be located on the rooftop, a minimum of 10 feet from the roof’s edge.

Typical noise levels produced by residential HVAC units would range from 53 to 63 dBA at 3 feet during operation. These types of units typically cycle on and off continuously during daytime and nighttime hours. Therefore, multiple units clustered in the same general vicinity are usually operating simultaneously at any given time. Assuming up to eight units would operate simultaneously at any given time, the estimated combined noise level at 3 feet would be up to 72 dBA.

The property line of the nearest single-family residences would be approximately 85 feet from the nearest rooftop equipment. At this distance, the worst-case combined noise levels would be up to 43 dBA. The property line of the church to the north would be approximately 35 feet from the nearest rooftop equipment, and at this distance, the worst-case combined noise levels would be up to 51 dBA. While this is a sensitive use, the church would not have occupants during nighttime hours; therefore, this would be considered a less-than-significant impact. All other uses would be 100 feet or more from the rooftop equipment and would not be subject to operational noise levels exceeding the City’s Municipal Code noise standards. This is a less-than-significant impact.

Additionally, the site plan shows a transformer pad at the rear of the building on the ground level.

Typically, transformers up to 1,000 kVA generate noise levels up to 64 dB, as measured at 1 meter (3.28 feet). This would represent the worst -case scenario for a building of this size. The nearest receiving residential property line would be approximately 60 feet to the west of the transformer pad.

2 Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., “Santa Clara Mixed-Use Project Environmental Noise Assessment,” August 5, 2016.

24 At this distance, transformer n oise levels would be up to 38 dBA, which would meet the City’s thresholds during daytime and nighttime hours. The nearest commercial property line would be approximately 110 feet south of the transformer pad. At this distance, noise levels generated by the transformer would be up to 33 dBA, which would satisfy the City standards. This would be a less- than-significant impact.

Mitigation Measure 1c: None required.

Impact 2: Exposure to Excessive Groundborne Vibration due to Construction.

Construction-related vibration levels resulting from activities at the project site would potentially exceed 0.3 in/sec PPV at the existing structures to the west and to the north the project site. This is a potentially significant impact.

The construction of the project may generate vibration when heavy equipment or impact tools (e.g., jackhammers, hoe rams) are used. Construction activities would include grading, foundation work, paving, and new building framing and finishing. According to the equipment list provided at the time of this study, impact or vibratory pile driving activities, which can cause excessive vibration, are not expected for the proposed project.

For structural damage, the California Department of Transportation recommends a vibration limit of 0.5 in/sec PPV for buildings structurally sound and designed to modern engineering standards,

0.3 in/sec PPV for buildings that are found to be structurally sound but where structural damage is a major concern, and a conservative limit of 0.08 in/sec PPV for ancient buildings or buildings that are documented to be structurally weakened. No known ancient buildings or buildings that are documented to be structurally weakened adjoin the project area. Therefore, conservatively, groundborne vibration levels exceeding 0.3 in/sec PPV would have the potential to result in a significant vibration impact.

Table 8 presents typical vibration levels that could be expected from construction equipment , as measured at a distance of 25 feet. Project construction activities, such as drilling, the use of jackhammers, rock drills and other high -power or vibratory tools, and rolling stock equipment (tracked vehicles, compactors, etc.), may generate substantial vibration in the immediate vicinity.

Jackhammers typically generate vibration levels of 0.035 in/sec PPV, and drilling typically generates vibration levels of 0.09 in/sec PPV at a distance of 25 feet. Vibration levels would vary depending on soil conditions, construction methods, and equipment used.

Table 8 also summarizes the estimated vibration levels at the nearest existing buildings surrounding the project site. Construction vibration levels would depend on the specific location of individual pieces of equipment. That is, equipment scattered throughout the site would not generate a collective vibration level, but a vibratory roller, for instance, operating near the project site boundary would generate the worst-case vibration levels for the receptor sharing that property line. Further, construction vibrat ion impacts are assessed based on the potential for damage to buildings on receiving land uses, not at receptors at the nearest property lines. Therefore, the distances used to propagate construction vibration levels (as shown in Table 8), which are different than the distances used to propagate construction noise levels (as shown in Table 7), were

25 estimated under the assumption that each piece of equipment was operating along the nearest boundary of the project site, which would represent the worst-case scenario.

As shown in Table 8, vibration levels could potentially exceed the conservative 0.3 in/sec PPV at the residences to the west of the site and at the nearest church building to the north of the site.

A study completed by the US Bureau of Mines ana lyzed the effects of blast-induced vibration on buildings in USBM RI 8507.
3 The findings of this study have been applied to buildings affected by construction- generated vibrations. 4 As reported in USBM RI 85073 and reproduced by Dowding,4 Figure 3 presents the damage probability, in terms of “threshold damage,” “minor damage,” and “major damage,” at varying vibration levels. Threshold damage, which is described as cosmetic damage in this report, would entail hairline cracking in plaster, the opening of old cracks, the loosening of paint or the dislodging of loose objects. Minor damage would include hairline cracking in masonry or the loosening of plaster, and major structural damage would include wide cracking or shifting of foundation or bearing walls. As shown in Figure 3, maximum vibration levels of 0.6 in/sec PPV would result in a less than 8% chance of threshold damage or cosmetic damage, while no minor or major damage would be expected.

Typical construction equipment, as shown in Table 8, would have the potential to produce vibration levels of 0.3 in/sec PPV or more at the nearest buildings adjoining the site . While no minor or major damage would occur at these conventional buildings , there is the potential to generate threshold or cosmetic damage at the surrounding buildings. This is a significant impact.

At these locations, and in other surrounding areas within 200 feet, vibration levels would potentially be perceptible. By use of administrative controls, such as notifying neighbors of scheduled construction activities and scheduling construction activities with the highest potential to produce perceptible vibration during hours with the least potential to affect nearby businesses, perceptible vibration can be kept to a minimum.

Mitigation Measure 2:

The following measures are recommended to reduce vibration impacts from construction activities to a less-than-significant level:

• Limit vibration-inducing equipment to the extent feasible.

• Where possible, use of the heavy vibration- generating construction equipment shall be prohibited within 20 feet of the adjacent building to the east and to the north.

• Use a smaller vibratory roller, such as the Caterpillar model CP433E vibratory compactor, when compacting materials within 20 feet of adjacent structures.

3 Siskind, D.E., M.S. Stagg, J.W. Kopp, and C.H. Dowding, Structure Response and Damage Produced by Ground Vibration form Surface Mine Blasting, RI 8507, Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations, U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C., 1980.
4 Dowding, C.H., Construction Vibrations, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1996.

26 • Modify/design or identify alternative construction methods to reduce vibration levels below the limits.

• Alternative methods for breaking up existing pavement, such as a pavement grinder, shall be used instead of dropping heavy objects, within 20 feet of adjacent buildings.

27 TABLE 8 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment Equipment PPV at 25 ft.
(in/sec)
Estimated Vibration Levels at Structures Surrounding the Project Site, in/sec PPV East Residences
(10 feet)
North Church
(10 feet)
South
Commercial
(80 feet)
South Hotel
(65 feet)
East Civic
Buildings
(125 feet)
Clam shovel drop 0.202 0.553 0.553 0.056 0.071 0.034
Hydromill (slurry
wall)
in soil 0.008 0.022 0.022 0.002 0.003 0.001
in rock 0.017 0.047 0.047 0.005 0.006 0.003
Vibratory Roller 0.210 0.575 0.575 0.058 0.073 0.036
Hoe Ram 0.089 0.244 0.244 0.025 0.031 0.015
Large bulldozer 0.089 0.244 0.244 0. 025 0.031 0.015
Caisson drilling 0.089 0.244 0.244 0.025 0.031 0.015
Loaded trucks 0.076 0.208 0.208 0.021 0.027 0.013
Jackhammer 0.035 0.096 0.096 0.010 0.012 0.006
Small bulldozer 0.003 0.008 0.008 0.001 0.001 0.001
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Federal Transit Administration, Office of Planning and Environment, U.S . Department of Transportation, September 2018, as modified by Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., November 2021.

28 FIGURE 3 Probability of Cracking and Fatigue from Repetitive Loading

Source: Dowding, C.H., Construction Vibrations, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1996, as modified by Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., November 2021.

No Observations of
“Minor Damage” or
“Major Damage” at

0.4 in/sec PPV

0.6 in/sec PPV

<8% Probability of
“Threshold Damage” at

0.6 in/sec PPV
Particle velocity (mm/sl
99 10 100 1000
•
E=J
•
95 • hre,ho ld damage
90 to inor damage • •• • ajor damage ., .,.
80 70
i
-~ 60
:.0
~ 50
~-·
~
Q.
t -40
.. 0
30 20
-· t/ •
10 i.r • I
s

0.5 10
Parti1;fe veloc ity (in./sec)

29 Impact 3: Excessive Aircraft Noise. The project site is located more than two miles from a public airport or public use airport, and the proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the area to excessive aircraft noise levels. This is a less-than-significant impact.

Norman Y. Mineta San José International Airport is a public-use airport located approximately 1.3 miles northeast of the project site. According to the
new Airport Master Plan Environmental Impact
Report,5 the project site lies well outside the 60 dBA CNEL co ntour line (see Figure 4). Aircraft noise would result in exterior noise levels below the City’s requirements for residential land uses.

Therefore, the proposed project would be compatible with the City’s exterior noise standards for aircraft noise.

Mitigation Measure 3: None required.

5 David J. Powers & Associates, Inc., Integrated Final Environmental Impact Report, Amendment to Norman Y.

Mineta San Jose International Airport Master Plan, April 2020.

30 FIGURE 4 2037 CNEL Noise Contours for SJIA Relative to Project Site

60 CNEL
60 CNEL
Project
Site
Figure 5
Scena rio 2: With Project 2037 Noise Contou r Map
SAN OSE INTElu'\i.ATIONAL AIRPORT Env,:ronmental Im ct ort FINAL October 2019 tlORM~~ ~. MH!E T~

SA N JOS E
I NT1E.RNATI0NAL

AIRPORT
Somce: BridgeNet Interna tional 2019
• · Noi•dtonilgring S1irti001
101 Site ID
Runway
7S lllA 011d i!lre111 .. 0NI; eoo,..,.
fij ,;!Bl, .id Gre.lerCNE C<iflll!'I.II"
65 lllA ar;d Glloal ~ CNliL COiilou
6B illA a11d GI lff CNEL COl!laur
Figur~· 5 Seenario 2:

Wi1h Project 20!37
Noise Cont11ur M~

31 Cumulative Impacts

Cumulative noise impacts would include either cumulative traffic noise increases under future conditions or temporary construction noise from cumulative construction projects.

A significant cumulative traffic noise increase would occur if two criteria are met: 1) if the cumulative traffic noise level increase was 3 dBA CNEL or greater for future levels exceeding 60 dBA CNEL or was 5 dBA CNEL or greater for future levels at or below 60 dBA CNEL; and 2) if the project would make a “cumulatively considerable” contribution to the ove rall traffic noise increase. A “cumulatively considerable” contribution would be defined as an increase of 1 dBA CNEL or more attributable solely to the proposed project.

A traffic study was not required for this project; therefore, the project would not be expected to result in a cumulatively considerable contribution along any roadway segments with noise - sensitive receptors. Therefore, the project would not result in a cumulative noise i ncrease due to traffic.

32 APPENDIX

FIGURE A1 Daily Trend in Noise Levels at LT-1, Wednesday, September 29, 2021

110
105
100
95 90
85 80
75 70
65 60
55 50
45 40
35 30
- -'-
--·
-'- -'- -,-
.<:)<:> . " ·':><:) .<:)<:> .<:)<:> .•?<:) <:)<:) <:)<:) .<:)<:> .<:)<:> .<:)<:> .<:)<:> <:)<:) .<:)<:> ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~- ~- ~- ~ ~-
Holli' Beginning
---•-- · Lmax
--L(1}
--L(10)
- L(SO)
- L(90)
--- Lmln
• Leq (hr}

33 FIGURE A2 Daily Trend in Noise Levels at LT-1, Thurs day, September 30, 2021

110
105
100
95 90
85 80
75 70
40 35
30 e-
- -t--t
' '
- -f-f-
"-i-
' '
$::,
l,; sf' $::,
'l,<:S .,_.
' '
$::, .cf' "j<:S b,·
-t--t -t--t
-f-f- -f-f-
' ' ' ' ' '
$::, $::, $::, $::, $::, .(:)(:) t,j<:S <o<:S '\<:S q;<:S <:i,<:S (:)· "
-t--t -t--t
- - -•--· Lmax f-f- f-f-
--L(1)
- L(10)
- L(SO)
- L(90)
--- Lmin
• Leq (hr)
CNEL= SSdBA
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
.(:)(:) $::, .(:)(:) .(:)(:) $::, $::, $::, .(:)(:) $::, .(:)(:) .(:)(:) $::, .(:)(:) .,_. .,_'l,c:s .,_<>;,· b, · '6':;l <o',3 ,,;,',3 <o· <:i,<:S ~· 'l,"-. rt? ,y' " " " " " " " 'l,
Hour Beginning

34 FIGURE A3 Daily Trend in Noise Levels at LT-1, Fri day, October 1, 2021

110
105
100
95 90 e-
- -t--t ~ -t--t ~ -t--t ~ -t--t ~ -t--t ~ -t--t
85 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
,-.
80 < i:Q
-= 75 ._,
'il 70 ..

Q,
~
Q, 65
V,
·-0
60 z
55 50
' ' ~ ' ' ' '
- -f-f- -f-f- • •-' -f-f- -f-f- -f-f-' '
"-i- ··~ •:, _,
' ·~· ~:¼ -1::===i: . -~~ -~ - • ~ - ''J> ~-j:;-1'"- t=!=fi-=' . - ~ - ~a ~ ' , fl,:'. 4 :f l r-~-
~ -l); 'l
-:t~
~
·.;..)'(....--, ~-, ~'N'.
, . ._ -
I 1 ·1- 1 '·
__ ..,. V
' : - □~4\j..L.. . _.,,., '
·11= .,..,
~ . ' I-"' •X~f,f=; lli.: ::r. -F _, - ••4 ,-,,• __,,_#_ '--1·\ • - ·&A- -V--
-·~ \t-j 4-, ~ ·= <l ~
~ ~·· ◄ - ;..~ -~
-
~ , - r:: : ~~~ · : : :
4 - . _y_~ ,-:i~-,
~
-,__,.
- --•--· Lmax
--L(1)
- L(10)
- L(SO)
- L(90)
--- Lmin
• Leq (hr)
45 : - " - -.---, --,- --
--,,
40 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
35 - ' ' ' ' '
30 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
cf' ,;::,I::> ,;::,I::> ,;::,I::> ,;::,I::> ,;::,I::> .,;::,<::> _,;::,<::> .,/? .,;::,<::> .,;::,<::> ,;::,<::> ,;::,I::> ,;::,I::> .,;::,<::> ,;::,I::> .,;::,<::> .,;::,<::> ,;::,I::> .,;::,<::> ~ ~-~~-ti ~- ~ - ~ - -~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~- ~ ~- ~- ~- ~ ~
Hou.- Beginnin g

35 FIGURE A4 Daily Trend in Noise Levels at LT-2, Fri day, November 19, 2021

110
105
100
95 90
85 80
75 70
65 60
55 50
45 40
35 30
i-+
-j- -j-
' .i
-j- -j- -j-
- --•--· Lmax
--L(1}
,-:::I ~, . ~ - ~- ~ - • ~~ I· ,-f-1 ,.. t1- -A~. . -.L(10) V -<>~ v~ 1':~:....+-'<l=¥ ,_fit~ 'r ~~ ~:~ ·:J:'12A::::1f~ I -il--1=-,.,~-Y~ :;i: ~ : 9'ii/·\:·ii-•t <',l · - L(50) :+:-e-"'-"'' -~r~ i='il. .(i-v -~~ -
-ft.i~ ~ - .... ~~ }j ~ ·
·---·
- L(90}
--- Lmin
• Leq (hr}
.171
_,.,_
-~¢"·~ -~ =-; ·:.:
-· _J :-' , ,._ •
,-,-n.. ~---+-,:~ - - I =r

36 FIGURE A5 Daily Trend in Noise Levels at LT-2, Satur day, November 20, 2021

110
105
100
95 90
85 ,__
80 <
~
-= 75 ._,
~
70 ..

Q,
~
Q, 65
V,
·-0
60 z
55 50
45 40
35 30
t=
' ' ' ' ' '
' ·~ ~t~ -t-
~ +-' ~
~-
i--' ~ +-'
' ' ' ' } --;-1 ' ' - ' '
~ · t~ · :: . . . : . . : . c:=-~ •-r.-;:~ ' ' t~ ,.·~ ._• . . : . .0. • ~ ;,~ ,_,- f . U /-• ~ . ,-, ~ ~•-t ~--, - u_ f:hr-=, , . . • - ~ _ :-,- - 1, 11 I '- - ,-- 1-4- ~ ... -- :__U ; -I L -1-: ;J-;-' -•- ;;- ,-f- ~ :i=ij ~-ti· -::i.: ·,..~ +-.-J:..~" ~-, -~ !-i=A:bt-x:-~ •-Aflli.:.:!-.t=,;l.-j-..M.it-=-- A=t--~-.• :t ~-I -1-I-;+- -<I- "l ll ...!'tf'- '...-- ,-A- 1·1 I I -~ A:•,., - f ...l. .I - . f - , - I ~-· l t-j r r.-1--! !:J;~ /• •~ , -A ~ • ~ b{-h i.-6 ~\II -• ~ ~ ~
~~ ~h ~~
.-'-i· 'li=i:-'--\ ~ +i· I I • I ' ~ r- - - - - . - ._.t--ff- . ,. - - r-. ' .L, .. ~.::§ A,' •",~ 1 ,::_ ~_P-::..Jt -.. - ~ CQ .. 11' - C ~ r - .. - . -,-,--, ~< L ; 4 ·t--!-i-. . . -!1· - ·- - ... . . : , I- , - : _._ - - ·~ < ~ 'ii.t.::; I :iI-f~ t= ,===r-t-'J.. " .Y...( _v_,_ ~- . " -'-'- rt~ ~ - ,--, . I i"1 - 1•· 1--'•'--'- . - -= - -- - ,_ .. . .... ~ ,--,-/' /4 ,-Ile , --1-=- +"'Gfl. b ~ ~~ ~ ~15...N ,-- ~ 3-M~ --
-,-, - ~T~
_., i:-~-. 'i"/1~-jif
~-1111r,.- A.- ,..., .. ,, -..{~
1r • :~ ii."'-+:. It\
_ LU ._ .,VJ~
~ t' tr ' ,- ~ .. •-~ '. ~ - -:::.:i. t:: .:±= 1't -4:j ~ ~M:~ 1-...l._ • -- ---- . U , r ;,- -- I
I. ,. ::w: ·-·
.. ·IJ· ,-,- '.<>!'.\ ,,. ' ~ ~ ,;~ ;::;-~ '.C::. = . -1:J'\'-- I\· - ~ ,~ -~ ·-•-V- ·Q c.' sX;.
_,_
·~
.. . [!), .. .,,._
'V~ --
,_
·= .. ... ··--
...

X "i X'
.. .

I ~ -•
w
-- ·- · -,;;;.·
-""
p ~
"
_\ -
~
., - . .,, .. , ~ :-;....~ ,. ; ' ' ; ; ;
.. , ~ ' ' ' '
... "' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
e-'-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-'
- -
' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
_<:,<:, .,.-'? _<:,<:, _<:,<:, '?<:;,<:, <:,<:, <:,<:, _<:,<:, <:,<:, _<:,<:, _<:,<:, <:,<:, _<:,<:, "" " , v "",· "l><· " "x;. "'\· "'o· "~· ,£>' '1-"" ,o:,· ,c,· Hool' Beginnin g
- --•--· Lmax
--L(1)
_.,.__ L(10)
- L(SO)
--L(90)
--- Lmin
• Leq (hr)
CNEL= 60 dBA

37 FIGURE A6 Daily Trend in Noise Levels at LT-2, Sunday, November 21, 2021

110 ·:i=
105
100
95 90 "--i -: -: ·-
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 85
,-.
80 <
~
-= 75 .._,
-Q,
70 ~
~
Q, 65
V,
·-0
60 :z
55 50
45 - 1=l: t j: 1=t t t 1=l:

J.... -1- -+-·ii
~
- - ,---¼--
, , , ~ , l'E.A, i I t. 1 i i I I ,:~ 4-t.--J:l--4-
t 4 ~~ r~ "~ " -~• 1 ➔- ~ f'... 'l~/t ,;;-~ a--• .~ . . ~~ .. · ~- u_ , ·- ~ -•,· ,,~ ~- --· -~,- ... -' " .... _ , _ , - • I ' - , H~,-, -• - t--,""- -, .-,---,,, -..j._. •~ 4 -t -\ri.'- ,-., ::;E'.:A 4-::}; t /~-, · :"'i -,u- ,~~1-' ,_.i .:...,.....___.:, , u.1,}1-~ -r;-·--· ~ ~:- ~J -.._...,,, -,.- ~ i - •,-..-.. •:4 ~ :..,.11i-;-,Tj!~~+.6· ,..,,_ tt "'o"W ~•·).; · - __;__ - . ..,.-,~-:r.• -u; ,.-, ,-~ , ·- · ,.. ~~ :-. t ,_ - '--':, tr, - J•- "' '-'. - - _- . ~ ':I - - . ...,..~ .X L . ,::-: . ~- . , 1:>- , ::$ L. - :~:,::r:1~.:.~_,._ " :; . ~ ~<; , ( , , --~_g.:.~~.2 -1-, - -=- ,,_ . ~ M Y • _., fit ii~*- ·~
·-tt U-t -J'.., ·V:l,c;f.:.'5/.:<l'fT• -~ . ~ - ,__!~· ,-1-< -l-! 17.::j=,>-- .• .:J - I • t :-1-!-)1 =1-· cici:( l o ---~ ,_11f-1r-.-- - ·f i--- ~ - ~ !!ii~ ,;,--.. - .!• ~-r:,--f ~~ : t;:~ ~-:,, .-.i=i: ' ~·-';.,: :1-~ -_...;~ -:-M -~ -~- - ~ 7-\:-- :;t'.'.::~ '~2 -~~ _j_ - ;-- , ,~ P- =I~ .\---. ..... _;.J._ '-=i ~ -IJ>/1.. ., If'" IL· ,, · - . ' ·- -
~
◄ ,q...., ~~\- d.l' ~ ,--
. -~~ -- .

I - -r ~-I-=--"',,,_"' . ..,.ca,., ., ~ --- - - ,.....,. =-,-,
-·~ -~ ...... _.,~ ; ' ' ·----~ ~--
' '
< .
=-~, '
-- -•--· Lmax
--L(1)
--L(10)
- L(SO)
- L(90)
--- Lmin
• Leq (hr)
CNEL= 61 dBA
40 ' ' ' ! ' ' ' ' ! ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' t-
35 ' ' ' ' ' '
30 ~
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
<::i<::i <::i<::i <::i<::i <::i<::i <::i<::i <::i<::i .<::i<::i .<::i<::i .,/s_S> .<::i<::i .<::i<::i <::i<::i <::i<::i <::i<::i <::i<::i .<::i<::i .<::i<::i .<::i<::i <::i<::i .<::i<::i ~- ~-~~ - ti ~- ~ - ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ - ~- ~ ~ - Hour Beginning

38 FIGURE A7 Daily Trend in Noise Levels at LT-2, Mon day, November 22, 2021

---<
~
"Cl '-'
-Cl,
...

Cl,
~
Cl,
V,
·-0
z
110
105
100
95 90
85 80
75 70
65 60
55 50
45 40
35 ,
30 Rl
l"
,<:)<:>
".
.l.
' ' '
Rl Rl ,<:)<:> ,{:S n;<s b,.
.l.
' ' ' ' '
Rl Rl Rl Rl Rl .<:><:> <,;(;! <ors '\(;j 'I:,(;! <i;,(;j <:>· "
---•--· Lmax
--L(1)
--L(10)
- L(SO)
--L(90)
--- Lmin
• Leq (hr)
CNEL= 62 dBA
.l. , __
' ' ' ' ' '
.<:><:> Q .<:><:> .<:><:> Rl Rl Rl .<:><:> .<:><:> .<:><:> .<::,<:> Q .<:><:> "' .._r,? ~· b,· <,;(;! <o(;j ,.,_.(;! ,__'l:>· .__~· 'l,<:>· 'l,"-. ft,(;j ,y' " " " " " " 'l,
Hou.- Beginnin g

39 FIGURE A8 Daily Trend in Noise Levels at LT-2, Tues day, November 23, 2021

110
105 ' ' . '
100
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
95 ' ' . ' ' .
90 : ' : ' : ' : ' ' ' '
85 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,-...
80 <
~
-= 75 '-'
-ai 70 ..
~
~
~ 65
V,
·-0
60 z
55 50
45 ~ I I , .
' ' A: , 11 T '+~ ,.--~; • ~~ ~ -i-,,.-j- :\-t t -1-
' l ._ -,-~ ••- ~ '"- - . ., ,i, ~ J.--' -- 4 ih,i x::'~ - - 4)~ ~ '-'- "!!,::/s,A't- '-- J/_~ ~ I ~~ft~ I I '" *
t-' -•-I•---: , _,_ .f.-l-- I _ _I . \ 1- l. _ , _1 , -f-'-,- . . ~ I.~• -!~~ '-,---11 ~ _a,,,.. - ~-,➔~ ........ ~ -l-: ~ -· ~· -... -- ~ .i -4-, -}~ ]-,.I.-A-4-• -;~ -•-•r.,<,: 4: ,,.., -f• , J .
• r:+t:=t~ p ¼ t'§IJff_=-~ : =~ ~~=t -~ , 5:t+-~-. --,-~.,, . . r--+=~ ~ 1:lH~ =-~ ?,'t=J=t, --Li _,L =
- -. ~ _,,.,
I I -~=rA~ _;_1 ,. ; ,, i ~ _ _ ___
= ~~ I. . , < -.,. -J=l.t.i- -,.
:,t_{":1:fl~ .}y., ~ ~-~ ~ .,.,-v -,~ ~ " = · ,Q,, -:/-t ' ~ 1 -t ~ · -y-~"V-V Y . . .:- ~ > ~- 'J: -•-•-•--•-' ::1;1 _, = ~~ -- -=;".,,"'_ -,,,-wll ! ! : c - -'f\... - f':\lf . ~ - ·- : --- -,-,---;;:i -- ,~ --!•-i-!~.-t- .,_ ~ · ,.. - • •I!- :J~ Uz· ..!,~ . .. -,lj,• e:=, ~- ·~· -.:-_c~-- ~- ~v~ t'! -1 '= -. 2- I ... ·"--.-.,,. •"' --· -~-'--"'. -· - •-·.u:r~ -.. ... - , I= ~ ~-~ ,.,. p . - --
- ~ 2 ~ , -~\; '°"""" ~
-~
--a!
~
---
. )
I ,_; - :4 .. - .·
~
~
•-- M ,-~ - -- ., . l
._ .. , ~ q:::? :-t- .. , L'>A - . ... - = ' ·--~
_\ ..--.r...,,-, :r
-- -,-~_..,. -l '
---•-- · Lmax
--L(1)
--L(10)
- L(50)
- L(90)
--- Lmin
• Leq (hr)
CNEL= 62 dBA
40 --t
' ' ' '
35 ;
30 . . . . . . . . . .
##########~~~;;~~~~~ ~ ~~~
Hour Beginning

40 FIGURE A9 Daily Trend in Noise Levels at LT-2, Wednes day, November 24, 2021

,-.,
<
~
-= .._,
-<I,
~
~
<I, ,,,
·-0
:z:
110
105
100
' '
95 ' '
90 ·----'- -t--t --t--t ~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~
85 ' ' ' ' '
J
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' : :
80 ' ' ' ' '
-f-f- 1-f-f- -f-f- -f-f- -f-f-
75 70
65 60
55 50
45 ' 4 ' ' ' ' ' '
- ~¥:.t=i:. -~1~ ·•=~ - -o · :""JI- +
= t-1-/t=I-= I I ~,.__. · - ':: :-¢ :~ .~: ' ' If.= r.:i=-.s-\=Fi=,~ -A--+---=: ~(l •- ·'·'~- ' . " ' ' ~ ' I ' Fl-.'=i=i• · -IE~ ·r ,-., 'EE:'. - •· ~ -• , r - .. ·. :'f(_-/--., .... '"¼:'3: f-1 · - •~ , - -,-· I; I - · f '-' ..... ' .,,.
?~ -•~"M_ ~I,~ - ~~~
I -
,_
,_ =o , ~ - ~-\-_ , ,,--. ,_,
)'~
I
- "" = -
.~ , ~, i]
I .~\:i:;;-l d-::
: . ., .
!I~ :-~ - '
· -
~ <- + +- + + ~ <- + ~ -t + -t +
40 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
35 ~
' ' .l. ' '
30 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~- ~- ~- ~ ~- ~- ~ ~ ~- ~ ~- ~- ~- ~ ~- Houl' Beginning
---•-- · Lmax
--L(1}
--L(10)
- L(SO)
--L(90)
--- Lmin
• Leq (hr)

Memorandum

Date: April 25, 2022

To: Ms. Amber Sharpe, David J. Powers & Associates, Inc.

From: Kai-Ling Kuo, Jocelyn Lee

Subject: Transportation Study for Affordable Housing Development at 160 1 Civic Center Drive in Santa Clara, California

This memorandum presents trip generation estimates and evaluates site access, on-site circulation, and effects on pedestrians, bicycles, and transit facilities for the proposed affordable housing development at 1601 Civic Center Drive in Santa Clara, California. The project site is located on the northwest corner of the Lincoln Street and Civic Center Drive intersection. The project proposes to demolish the existing commercial building on-site and construct a five-story residential development with 108 affordable units. Vehicle access to the site would be provided via a driveway on Civic Center Drive and a driveway on Lincoln Street. The Civic Center driveway would provide access to the on-site surface lot, and the Lincoln Street driveway would provide access to the garage parking (see Figure 1).

Project Trip Estimates
Through empirical research, data have been collected that show trip generation rates for many types of land uses. The research is compiled in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The magnitude of traffic added to the roadway system by a particular development is estimated by multiplying the applicable trip generation rates by the size of the development. The rates published for “Mid-Rise Multifamily Housing” (Land Use Code 221) were used to estimate the trips generated by the proposed affordable housing development (see Table 1). The mid-rise multifamily housing category refers to apartments and condominiums located in a building that has between four to 10 floors of living space.

The ITE Trip Generation Manual provides rates for Affordable Housing (Land Use 223). However, the rates are based on only five studies. Thus, the multifamily housing (mid-rise) category provides a more accurate estimate for the project.

Per the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, housing projects located within 2,000 feet of a major bus stop can apply a two percent trip reduction to the trip generation. A major bus stop is defined as a stop where six or more buses per hour from the same or different routes stop during the peak period. The project is located within 2,000 feet of the bus stops along El Camino Real for VTA Routes 22 and 522, which both have a headway of 15 minutes during peak periods.

Based on the ITE trip generation rates and transit trip reduction, it is estimated that the proposed project would generate 480 daily trips, with 39 trips (9 in and 30 out) occurring during the AM peak hour and 41 trips (25 in and 16 out) occurring during the PM peak hour (see Table 1). The existing commercial building has been vacant since 2017, and therefore, no trip credit was given for the existing building on-site.
1601 Civic Center Drive Affordable Housing Development
Figure 1
Site Plan
UP
(9
(9
9$1
12 3$5.,1*
(9
UP
LINCOLN ST.

BLDG

ENTRYNEW DRIVEWAY
CIVIC CENTER DR.
9 UNIVERSAL STALLS
15 UNIVERSAL STALLS
14 UNIVERSAL STALLS
2 ADA VAN STALLS

NEW DRIVEWAY
3 EV READY STALLS
4 UNIVERSAL STALLS





3 UNIVERSAL STALLS
8 UNIVERSAL STALLS
8 UNIVERSAL STALLS
6 UNIVERAL STALLS
4 EV READY STALLS
1 ADA VAN STALL
1 ADA STALL
7 UNIVERSAL STALLS
1 1 EV READY STALL

AN - PARKING
1601 Civic Center Drive Affordable Housing Development April 25, 2022 Page | 3
Table 1
Project Trip Generation

Site Access and Circulation
A review of the project site plan was performed to determine if adequate site access and on-site circulation would be provided and to identify any access or circulation issues that should be improved.

This review is based on the site plan, dated April 8, 2022 (see Figure 1) and in accordance with generally accepted traffic engineering standards.

Site Access
Vehicle access to the site would be provided via two new full access driveways on Civic Center Drive and Lincoln Street. The project would close the existing driveway on Civic Center Drive and create a new driveway approximately 175 feet west of the existing driveway. The project would add a new driveway on Lincoln Street. The driveway on Civic Center Drive would provide access to the surface parking lot, and the driveway on Lincoln Street would provide access to the parking garage.

The project would increase the number of driveways accessing the site from one to two driveways.

Because the project would generate a low number of project trips, it is not necessary to provide two access points to the site for access and circulation. Increasing the access points would increase the conflicts between pedestrians/bicycles and vehicles. Therefore, the project should maintain only one driveway to access the site.

Recommendation: The project should provide only one driveway to access the sit e.

Driveway Design
The project driveways would provide two-way flow and would be 26 feet wide. According to the City of Santa Clara Municipal Code, Chapter 18.74 (Parking Regulations), two-way driveways providing access to 25 or more residential parking spaces should be at least 26 feet wide. The project driveways meet the requirement.

The Civic Center driveway shows approximately 30 feet of vehicle stacking space between the sidewalk and the first 90-degree parking stall, which would provide room for one inbound vehicle when vehicles back out of these parking stalls near the driveway. The Lincoln Street driveway shows approximately 65 feet of vehicle stacking space between the sidewalk and the first 90-degree parking stall, which would provide room for two inbound vehicles. Due to the low volume of project trips and the small number of on-site parking spaces, the probability of two or more inbound vehicles entering the Pk-Hr Pk-Hr
Land Use Trips Rate In Out Total Rate In Out Total
Proposed Apartments1 108 du 4.54 490 0.37 9 31 40 0.39 26 16 42 - Transit Reduction (2%) 2 -10 0 -1 -1 -1 0 -1
Net Project Trips 480 9 30 39 25 16 41
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition , 2021.

1. Av erage ITE trip rates for Mid-Rise Multifamily Housing (Land Use 221) are used.

2. Per VTA TIA Guidelines, a transit trip reduction is applied to the project that is within 2,000 feet of a major bus stop.

Size
Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Trip
Rate
Trips Trips
1601 Civic Center Drive Affordable Housing Development April 25, 2022 Page | 4
parking garage at the same time would likely be low. Therefore, the inbound stacking space at the driveways is expected to be adequate.

Sight Distance at Project Driveways
The proposed driveway locations were evaluated to determine if the sight distance at the driveways would be adequate. Adequate sight distance reduces the likelihood of a collision at driveways and provides drivers with the ability to locate sufficient gaps in traffic to exit a driveway. Sight distance of a driveway is evaluated based on the stopping sight distance recommended by Caltrain for a given design speed.

The landscape plan shows street trees would be added along the project frontage on Civic Center Drive and Lincoln Street. The type and location of the new street trees would be determined by the City at the implementation stage. Note that street trees have a high canopy and would not obstruct the view of drivers exiting the project driveways.

The posted speed limit on Civic Center Drive and Lincoln Street is 25 mph. The Caltrans stopping sight distance is 200 feet (based on a design speed of 30 mph). Thus, a driver must be able to see 200 feet in both directions of Civic Center Drive and Lincoln Street to locate a sufficient gap to turn out of the driveways.

There is a roadway curve on Civic Center Drive, approximately 250 feet west of the driveway, and on Lincoln Street, approximately 190 feet north of the driveway. However, there would be adequate sight distance for identifying vehicles turning around the curve. The proposed Civic Center driveway is located approximately 305 feet west of the Lincoln Street/Civic Center Drive intersection. Therefore, the sight distance would be adequate for vehicles turning from Lincoln Street and continuing westbound along Civic Center Drive. The Lincoln Street driveway is located approximately 220 feet north of the Lincoln Street/Civic Center Drive intersection. Therefore, the sight distance would be adequate for vehicles turning from Civic Center Drive and continuing northbound along Lincoln Street.

On-street parking is allowed on Civic Center Drive and Lincoln Street near the proposed project driveways and could obstruct the vision of exiting drivers if there were cars parked next to the driveways. Therefore, the project should provide at least 15 feet of red curb along both sides of the driveways to prohibit parking.

Recommendation: The curb segments next to the project driveways on Civic Cente r Drive should be painted red for 15 feet to prohibit parking and ensure adequate sight distance for outbound traffic.

Traffic Operations at Project Driveways
The project trips that are estimated to occur at the driveways are 9 inbound trips and 30 outbound trips in the AM peak hour and 25 inbound trips and 16 outbound trips during the PM peak hour.

Due to the relatively low number of project-generated trips at the driveways, operational issues related to vehicle queueing and/or vehicle delay are not expected to occur at the driveway. Some minor vehicle queuing could occur along eastbound Civic Center Drive, northbound Lincoln Street, and on-site due to a combination of the inherent unpredictability of vehicle arrivals at the driveway and the random occurrence of gaps in traffic along the streets. Based on the proposed parking spaces in the surface lot and parking garage, there would be more vehicles accessing the Lincoln Street driveway than the Civic Center driveway.

At the Lincoln Street driveway, the estimated 15 inbound trips during the PM peak hour calculate to about one trip every 4 minutes, and 18 outbound trips in the AM peak hour calculate to about one trip every 3 minutes. Therefore, the probability of two or more inbound and outbound vehicles entering and 1601 Civic Center Drive Affordable Housing Development April 25, 2022 Page | 5
exiting the driveways at the same time would be low. The maximum queue is not expected to affect eastbound traffic on Civic Center Drive, northbound traffic on Lincoln Street, or on-site circulation.

Passenger Loading
The site plan does not show any loading zones for dropping off and picking up passengers along the project frontages or within the site, which would be inconvenient for people accessing the site using Uber/Lyft or other rideshare apps (e.g., Scoop, Waze Carpool). It is expected that vehicles would drop passengers off along Civic Center Drive, Lincoln Street, or within the surface parking lot or parking garage. Because parking is available along Civic Center Drive along the project frontage, the project should a designate space as the pedestrian loading zone on Civic Center Drive near the entrance to the building lobby or designate a loading zone within the surface lot or parking garage near the building entrance.

Recommendation: The project should provide a passenger loading zone on Civic Center Drive near the entrance to the building lobby or within the surface parking lot or parking garage.

On-Site Circulation
The Civic Center driveway would provide access to the surface lot, and the Lincoln Street driveway would provide access to the adjacent parking garage. There would be no internal connection between the surface parking lot and parking garage, which is undesirable for on-site circulation because residents can enter the site and upon discovering that there is no available parking, must exit the site to check the other parking area. The project should provide internal circulation between the parking lot and parking garage.

The project would provide 90-degree parking throughout the site. All drive aisles are shown on the site plan to be 26 feet wide. The parking stalls measure 8.5 feet wide and 17 feet long for uniform stalls and 9 feet wide and 18 feet long for accessible and electric vehicle stalls. According to the City of Santa Clara Municipal Code, Chapter 18.74, off-street parking facilities may be designed with 100% uniform- size stalls, measuring 8.5 feet wide and 17 feet long. For parking facilities using the uniform stall dimensions, the minimum drive aisle width should be 24 feet. Therefore, the proposed parking stalls would meet the requirement. The proposed drive aisle width, in combination with the parking dimensions, would provide sufficient room for vehicles to back out of the 90-degree parking stalls.

On-site vehicle circulation was also evaluated to identify whether there are dead-end aisles within the surface lot and parking garage. Dead-end aisles are undesirable because drivers can enter the aisle, and upon discovering that there is no available parking, must back out or conduct three-point turns. The surface lot would be a dead-end aisle. Because of the length of the lot, it would be very difficult to back out. The project should provide a turnaround space at the dead-end aisle to provide adequate circulation.

Recommendation: The project should provide a turnaround space at the dead-end aisle in the surface parking lot to provide adequate circulation. The project should provide internal circulation between the parking lot and parking garage.

Emergency Vehicle and Truck Access and Circulation
Emergency vehicles would access the project site from Lincoln Street, Civic Center Drive, and the surface parking lot drive aisle via the driveway on Civic Center Drive. The project would provide adequate emergency access because the project buildings would be within the hose reach by fire trucks on Lincoln Street and Civic Center Drive, or in the surface parking lot drive aisle.

The project would provide a ground floor trash room along the northeast edge of the building with a staging area and a dedicated path for trash maneuvering along the north side of the Lincoln Street 1601 Civic Center Drive Affordable Housing Development April 25, 2022 Page | 6
driveway. The trash collection would occur at the curb along Lincoln Street. Garbage trucks would stop on Lincoln Street and workers would roll the bins from the staging area via the path and return the bins to the staging area after they are serviced.

Effects on Pedestrians, Bicycles, and Transit Facilities The following describes the existing and future transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities that serve the site and evaluates whether appropriate bicycle and pedestrian access and transit service are provided between the site and nearby destinations.

Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian facilities in the study area consist of sidewalks and crosswalks. A continuous network of sidewalks is present along all of the surrounding streets. Crosswalks with pedestrian signal heads are located at all of the signalized intersections in the area. A high visibility crosswalk and a standard crosswalk are available along the north leg and west leg, respectively, of the Lincoln Street/Civic Center Drive intersection.

The project would add a new driveway on Lincoln Street and increase the number of driveways accessing the site from one to two driveways, which would increase the conflicts between pedestrians/bicycles and vehicles on Lincoln Street. As discussed above, the project should maintain only one driveway to access the site.

The project would construct new 10-foot-wide sidewalks along the project frontages on Lincoln Street and Civic Center Drive. With the new sidewalks, the project should ensure that the curb ramp at the northwest corner of the Lincoln Street/Civic Center Drive intersection is built to ADA standards. The sidewalks and ADA curb ramp would facilitate pedestrian movements between the project site and surrounding points of interest, such as bus stops. In addition to new sidewalks along the project frontages, the project would also construct a publicly accessible forecourt with pedestrian walkways from Lincoln Street.

Within the site, pedestrian paths would be provided between sidewalks on the adjacent streets, the surface parking lot, and the proposed building. Therefore, pedestrian access to all proposed facilities within the project site would be provided.

Recommendation: With the new sidewalks along the project frontages, the projec t should ensure that the curb ramp at the northwest corner of the Lincoln Street/Civic Center Drive intersection is built to ADA standards.

Bicycle Facilities
There are bike lanes on Warburton Avenue and Monroe Street that connect cyclists from the project site to the surrounding areas. According to the Santa Clara Bicycle Master Plan Update 2018, Class II bike lanes are recommended along Lincoln Street between Warburton Avenue and El Camino Real and along Scott Boulevard for the entire street. A Class III bicycle boulevard is recommended along Lincoln Street south of El Camino Real. Class IV separated bike lanes are recommended along El Camino Real for the entire street.

The project would provide secure bicycle storage in a bike room on the ground level in the east edge of the building. The bike room would be accessed using the pedestrian walkway from Lincoln Street. The project would also provide bike racks in the surface parking lot next to the back entrance of the building.

Because the main entrance of the building is facing Civic Center Drive, the project should provide some bike racks near the main entrance.
1601 Civic Center Drive Affordable Housing Development April 25, 2022 Page | 7
It is expected that the project would generate some bicycle trips, which could utilize the existing bike lanes on surrounding streets to get to nearby commercial areas. According to the Bicycle Master Plan Update 2018, the proportion of Santa Clara residents that bicycle to work is about two percent, which equates to one new bicycle trip during the AM and PM peak hours for the project.

Recommendation: The project should provide bike racks near the main entrance o n Civic Center Drive.

Transit Services
A bus stop for the VTA Frequent Route 22 is located 635 feet from the project site on El Camino Real at Lincoln Street. Other routes with bus stops less than 2,000 feet from the project site include Local Routes 21 and 59 and Rapid Route 522. Due to the proximity of bus stops to the project site, it is assumed that some residents of the project would utilize the existing transit services. Assuming a commute hour transit mode share of two percent (as recommended by VTA guidelines), the project would generate one new transit rider during the peak hours. Therefore, it is anticipated that the new ridership could be accommodated by the existing transit services.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Access to Schools
The project site is located within the boundary of Scott Lane Elementary School, Buchser Middle School, and Santa Clara High School, which are about 0.7-mile north, 1.3-miles southeast, and 2.1 miles southwest of the project site, respectively. Scott Lane Elementary School is within walking distance. Elementary students choosing to walk to the school could use Civic Center Drive, Warburton Avenue, and Scott Boulevard. Safe and direct pedestrian access to the school is provided via a continuous network of sidewalks with crosswalks provided at all signalized intersections. Some high school students may bike to the school via Lincoln Street and Benton Street. Although there are bike lanes on Benton Street, Lincoln Street is not a bike route and has no bike lanes. Therefore, most students are expected to be driven or drive to the schools.

Conclusions
The site plan shows adequate site access and on-site circulation, and no significant on-site circulation issues are expected to occur as a result of the project. The project would not have an adverse effect on the existing pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facilities in the study area.

Hexagon has the following recommendations resulting from the site access and circulation evaluation.  The project should provide only one driveway to access the site.  The project should provide a passenger loading zone on Civic Center Drive near the entrance to the building lobby or within the surface parking lot or parking garage.  The project should provide internal circulation between the pa rking lot and parking garage.  The project should provide a turnaround space at the dead-end aisle in the surface parking lot to provide adequate circulation.
 The project should ensure that the curb ramp at the northwest corner of the Lincoln Street/Civic Center Drive intersection is built to ADA standards.
 The project should provide bike racks near the main entrance on Civic Center Drive.

Appendix G
San
itary Sewer Capacity Assessment
Civic Center Family Housing Project
In
itial Study
City of Santa Clara
Charities Housing
1601 Civic Center Drive Sewer Flow Monitoring Capacity Study Prepared for: Charities Housing
Sob
rato Center for Non-Profits
1400 Parkmoor Ave, Suite 190
San Jose, CA 95126
Date: December 2021
Prepared by:

V&A Project No. 21-0341
12/31/21

Table of Contents

| i
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Methods and Procedures .................................................................................................................. 3 Confined Space Entry ........................................................................................................... 3 Flow Meter Installation ......................................................................................................... 4 3 Results and Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 5 Design Flow Determination ................................................................................................... 5 Flow Monitoring Results ....................................................................................................... 5 City Standard “Monitored Flow” ............................................................................................ 6 Pipeline Capacity Analysis .................................................................................................... 6 Derived Flow Results ............................................................................................................ 8 Proposed Development Flows .................................................................................. 8 Wet Weather Groundwater Infiltration (Q WWGWI ) ........................................................ 9 Rainfall-Dependent Infiltration and Inflow (Q RDI/I ) ................................................... 10 Design Flow (Q D) .................................................................................................... 10 Estimated Pipeline Capacity ................................................................................... 11 Appendix A Flow Monitoring Site Report: Data, Graphs, Information ..................................................... A-1 Appendix B City of Santa Clara: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Assessment Standards ................................. B-1 Tables
Table 1-1. Description of Flow Monitoring Location ................................................................................. 1 Table 3-1. Dry Weather Flow Monitoring Summary .................................................................................. 5 Table 3-2. Q M, Monitored Flow ................................................................................................................. 6 Table 3-3. Pipeline Capacity .................................................................................................................... 7 Table 3-4. Flow Generation from Proposed Developments ...................................................................... 8 Table 3-5. Design Flow Results ............................................................................................................. 10 Table 3-6. Pipeline Capacity Results Summary ...................................................................................... 11

Table of Contents

ii | V&A Project No. 21-0341 1601 Civic Center Drive Flow Monitoring Study Figures
Figure 1-1. Location of Development and Flow Monitoring Sites ............................................................. 2 Figure 2-1. Typical Installation for Flow Meter with Submerged Sensor ................................................... 4 Figure 3-1. S46-MH37 Manning’s Flow Curve .......................................................................................... 7 Figure 3-1. Approximate Tributary Area of monitoring sites ..................................................................... 9

Photo Log
Photo 2-1 . Confined Space Entry . ............................................................................................................ 3 Photo 2-2. Typical Personal Four-Gas Monitor . ........................................................................................ 3

Introduction

| 1
1 Introduction
V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc. (V&A) was retained by Charities Housing to perform sanitary sewer flow m
onitoring and capacity analysis within the City of Santa Clara (City), California. Open-channel flow monitoring was performed at two manholes for one week from November 29, 2021, through December 06, 2021 (S46-MH71) and December 06, 2021, through December 10, 2021 (S46-MH37). The purpose of this study was to identify the average and peak flows and to determine the available capacity of the subject pipes for the future Charities Housing development of 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA.

Flow monitoring sites are identified as the manholes where the flow monitors were secured and the pipelines wherein the flow sensors were placed.

The flow monitoring sites were selected and approved by the City of Santa Clara. Information regarding the flow monitoring locations are listed in Table 1-1. Figure 1-1 illustrates the location of the project site at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA and its proximity to the flow monitoring sites. Detailed descriptions of the flow monitoring sites, including photographs, are included in Appendix A.

Table 1-1. Description of Flow Monitoring Location
Manhole ID Location Pipe
Diameter
Pipe
Material
Inlets
Monitored
S46-MH37 Monroe St btwn Cabrilo Ave & Don Ave
(37.358980°, -121.954083°) 8 inches VCP Southeast
S46-MH71 Warburton Ave at Fillmore St
(37.355580°, -121.953189°) 8 inches VCP West

Introduction

2 | V&A Project No. 21-0341 1601 Civic Center Drive Flow Monitoring Study

F
igure 1-1. Location of Development and Flow Monitoring Sites

Methods and Procedures

| 3
2 Methods and Procedures
Confined Space Entry
A confined space (Photo 2-1) is defined as any space that is large enough and so configured that a p
erson can bodily enter and perform assigned work, has limited or restricted means for entry or exit and is not designed for continuous employee occupancy. In general, the atmosphere must be constantly monitored for sufficient levels of oxygen (19.5% to 23.5%), and the presence of hydrogen sulfide (H 2S) g
as, carbon monoxide (CO) gas, and lower explosive limit (LEL) levels. A typical confined space entry crew has members with OSHA-defined responsibilities of Entrant, Attendant, and Supervisor. The Entrant is the individual performing the work. He or she is equipped with the necessary personal protective equipment needed to perform the job safely, including a personal four-gas monitor (Photo 2-2). If it is not possible to maintain line-of-sight with the Entrant, then more Entrants are required until line-of-sight can be maintained. The Attendant is responsible for maintaining contact with the Entrants to monitor the atmosphere using another four-gas monitor and maintaining records of all Entrants, if there is more than one. The Supervisor is responsible for developing the safe work plan for the job at hand prior to entering.

Photo 2-1. Confined Space Entry Photo 2-2. Typical Personal Four-Gas Monitor

Methods and Procedures

4 | V&A Project No. 21-0341 1601 Civic Center Drive Flow Monitoring Study Flow Meter Installation
V&A installed two Isco 2150 area-velocity flow meters for temporary metering within the collection s
ystem. Isco 2150 meters use submerged sensors with a pressure transducer to collect depth readings and an ultrasonic Doppler sensor to determine the average fluid velocity. The ultrasonic sensor emits high-frequency (500 kHz) sound waves, which are reflected by air bubbles and suspended particles in the flow. The sensor receives the reflected signal and determines the Doppler frequency shift, which indicates the estimated average flow velocity. The sensor is typically mounted at a manhole inlet to take advantage of smoother upstream flow conditions. The sensor may be offset to one side to lessen the chances of fouling and sedimentation where these problems are expected to occur. Manual level and velocity measurements were taken during the installation of the flow meters and again when they were removed and compared to simultaneous level and velocity readings from the flow meters to ensure proper calibration and accuracy. Figure 2-1 shows a typical installation for a flow meter with a submerged sensor.

Figure 2-1. Typical Installation for Flow Meter with Submerged Sensor

Results and Analysis

| 5
3 Results and Analysis
Design Flow Determination
The flow monitoring design flow determination as defined by the City Standard is as follows:

QD = Q M + Q WWGWI + Q RD I/I + Q PD
Where:

QD = Design Flow
QM = Monitored Flow
QWWGWI = Wet Weather Groundwater Infiltration
QRD I/I = Rainfall-Dependent Infiltration and Inflow
QPD = Proposed Development Peak Flow

Flow Monitoring Results
Table 3-1 lists the ADWF, peak measured flow and other calculated factors used to determine the p
ipeline capacity. Detailed graphs of the flow monitoring data are included in Appendix A .

Table 3-1. Dry Weather Flow Monitoring Summary
Item S46-MH37
Southeast
S46-MH71
West
Pipe Diameter (in): 8.0 8.0
Measured Sediment (in): 0 0
Overall ADWF (gpm): 66.9 1 1.1
Peak Flow (gpm): 113.4 6.7
Peak Level (in): 3.51 1.18
Peaking Factor: 1.7 6.12
d/D Ratio: 0.44 0.15
1The flows for S46-MH37 were taken from December 6, 2021 through December 10, 2021 due to meter failure the prior week. 2The peaking factor for Site 2 is skewed high due to low flow conditions.

The following information should be noted:
 T
here was no observable inflow and infiltration respo nse at S46-MH37 from the small rain event that occurred December 7, 2021.

Results and Analysis

6 | V&A Project No. 21-0341 1601 Civic Center Drive Flow Monitoring Study City Standard “Monitored Flow”
Monitored F low: P er the City’s Standards for the flow monitoring design flow determination, the monitored flow (QM) is the greater of the following:

QM = Monitored Peak Flow
O
R
QM = 2.5 X Monitored Average Flow

T
able 3-2. QM, Monitored Flow
Item S46-MH37
Southeast
S46-MH71
West
Monitored Peak Flow (gpm) 113.4 6.7

2.5 x Monitored Average Flow (gpm) 167.3 2.8
QM, Monitored Flow (gpm) 167.3 6.7

Pipeline Capacity Analysis
The pipeline capacity was estimated by using the Manning equation:
n
A S RQ × × ×=
2132
669

w
here
A: Cross-sectional area of flow (ft2)
R
: hydraulic radius (ft), calculated from flow level d and pipe diameter D S: Pipeline slope (ft/ft)
n: Roughness coefficient (unitless)
Q: Flow rate (ft3/s)

T
he following factors were selected to determine the pipeline capacity.  Roughness coefficients: 0.013 for VCP pipe is a widely accepted number for sanitary sewer design.
 Pipeline Slope: The slope for S46-MH71 was provided by City of Santa Clara field measurements. The slope for S46-MH37 was derived from flow data hydraulic conditions. The City of Santa Sanitary Sewer Maps did not state pipe slope for this location.  Design Flow Depth: T
he City Standard requires that sewer should be designed for peak flow rate not to exceed 75% full pipe.

Results and Analysis

| 7
Table 3-3. Pipeline Capacity
Item S46-MH37
Southeast
S46- MH71
West
Capacity
Pipe Diameter (in.) 8 8
Pipeline Slope 0.0040 1 0.0051 2
Mannings roughness, n 0.013 0.013
Full-Pipe Capacity (gpm) 344.1 387.3
City Allowable Peak Flow at 0.75 d/D (gpm) 313.8 353.2
1Derived from flow data hydraulic measurements. City maps did not state surveyed slope of pipeline. See Figure 3-1 below. 2City of Santa Clara verified the slope between S46- MH70 and S46- MH71 on 12/03/21.

F
igure 3-1. S46-MH37 Manning’s Flow Curve

Full-Pipe Capacity =
344.1 gpm
Results and Analysis

8 | V&A Project No. 21-0341 1601 Civic Center Drive Flow Monitoring Study Derived Flow Results
Proposed Development Flows

T
he proposed development is a mix of commercial and residential space. The peak development flow is calculated in Table 3-4. The Base Wastewater Unit Flow Factors established by the City can be found in Appendix B.

Table 3-4. Flow Generation from Proposed Developments
Development City Use/Type Unit or ft 2 Sewage
Generation Rate 1 Flow (Gal/Day)
1601 Civic
Center Drive Santa Clara Residential 112 units 154 gpd/DU 17,248 gpd

QPD, Proposed Development Peak Flow (Total) 17,248 gpd
(12.0 GPM)

THEREFORE,

QPD = 12. 0 gpm
Results and Analysis

| 9
Wet Weather Groundwater Infiltration (QWWGWI)
The wet weather groundwater infiltration (Q WWGWI ) is derived from multiplying the wet weather g
roundwater infiltration (factor) by the tributary area served by the sanitary sewer main being monitored. The tributary areas upstream of the monitored site are shown in Figure 3-1. The project site is located within the tributary area M_15 (Appendix B). The factor for this area is 700 gpd/acre established by the City Standard as shown in Appendix B.

QWWGWI Site = WWGWI x Tributary Area
= 700 gpd/acre x 66.6 acres = 46,620 gpd or 32.4 gpm (S46-MH37) = 700 gpd/acre x 33.9 acres = 23,730 gpd or 16.5 gpm (S46-MH71)

THEREFORE,

Figure 3-2. Approximate Tributary Area of monitoring sites QWWGWI = 32.4 gpm (S46-MH37)
QWWGWI = 16.5 gpm (S46-MH71)

Results and Analysis

10 | V&A Project No. 21-0341 1601 Civic Center Drive Flow Monitoring Study Rainfall-Dependent Infiltration and Inflow (QRDI/I)
The rainfall-dependent infiltration and inflow (Q RDI/I ) is derived the same way as the wet weather g
roundwater infiltration. Per City Standards, 1,000 gpd/acre is used for Q RDI/I flow determination.

QRDI/I = RDI/I x Tributary Area
=
1,000 gpd/acre x 66.6 acres = 66,600 gpd or 46.3 gpm (S46-MH37) = 1,000 gpd/acre x 33.9 acres = 33,900 gpd or 23.5 gpm (S46-MH71)

THEREFORE,

Design Flow (QD)

T
able 3-5 shows the summary of the design flow results including both monitored flow results and derived flow results.

Table 3-5. Design Flow Results
Item S46-MH37
Southeast
S46-MH71
West
QM, Monitored Flow (gpm) 167.3 6.7
QPD, Proposed Development Peak Flow (gpm) 12.0 12.0
QWWGWI , Wet Weather Groundwater Infiltration (gpm) 32.4 16.5 QRDI/I , Rainfall Dependent Infiltration and Inflow (gpm) 46.3 23.5 QD, Design Flow (gpm) 258.0 58.7

QRDI/I = 46.3 gpm (S46-MH37)
QRDI/I = 23.5 gpm (S46-MH71)
Results and Analysis

| 11
Estimated Pipeline Capacity
Table 3-6 summarizes the capacity analysis for the pipelines that would be affected by the proposed d
evelopment area.

Table 3-6. Pipeline Capacity Results Summary
No. Item S46-MH37
Southeast
S46-MH71
West
1 City Allowable Peak Flow at 0.75*d/D (gpm) 313.8 1 353.2 2 QD, Design Flow (gpm) 258.0 58.7
3 Available Capacity (gpm)
(No. 1 – No. 2) 55.8 294.5
4 Has Capacity For 100% of Development? YES
(82.2% of capacity)
YES
(16.6% of capacity)

1City Allowable Peak Flow at 75% based on derived slope values in Section 3.4

Appendix A
Flow Monitoring Site Report: Data, Graphs, Information

| A - 1
Appendix A
Flow Monitoring Site Report:

Data, Graphs, Information

Appendix A
Flow Monitoring Site Report: Data, Graphs, Information

A - 2 | V&A Project No. 21-0341 – 1601 Civic Center Drive Flow Monitoring Study MH37 Satellite View

MH37 Street View MH37 Sanitary Sewer Map

Appendix A
Flow Monitoring Site Report: Data, Graphs, Information

| A - 3

MH37 Flow Diagram MH37 Plan View
MH37 Effluent Pipe MH37 Monitored Southeast Influent Pipe

Appendix A
Flow Monitoring Site Report: Data, Graphs, Information

A - 4 | V&A Project No. 21-0341 – 1601 Civic Center Drive Flow Monitoring Study

M
H37 Flow Monitoring Details (12/06/21 to 12/10/21)

Appendix A
Flow Monitoring Site Report: Data, Graphs, Information

| A - 5
MH37 Satellite View

MH71 Street View MH71 Sanitary Sewer Map

Appendix A
Flow Monitoring Site Report: Data, Graphs, Information

A - 6 | V&A Project No. 21-0341 – 1601 Civic Center Drive Flow Monitoring Study

MH71 Flow Diagram MH71 Plan View
MH71 North Effluent Pipe MH71 East Effluent Pipe

MH71 Monitored West Influent Pipe

Appendix A
Flow Monitoring Site Report: Data, Graphs, Information

| A - 7

MH71 Flow Monitoring Details (11/29/21 to 12/06/21)

Appendix B
City of Santa Clara: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Assessment Standards

| B- 1
Appendix B
City of Santa Clara: Sanitary
Sewer Capacity Assessment
Standards

DESIGN CRITERIA
for Improvements in
Public Right-of-Ways
and City Easements

City of Santa Clara
Public Works Department
September 2014
Design Criteria
City of Santa Clara Public Works Department

Prior to any flow monitoring work, the proposed monitoring location(s) shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Flow monitoring measurements to determine average and peak flows, in existing pipes, shall be done over a period of at least seven (7) consecutive days with continuous mechanical/electronic measurements in a manner acceptable to the Director of Public Works/City Engineer.

An Encroachment Permit (EP) is required to allow developer to monitor the sanitary sewer flows.
. Design flow determination shall be as follows:

Q
D = QM + QWWGWI + QRDI/I + QPD
Where:

Q = Flow
D = Design
M = Monitored
WWGWI = Wet Weather Groundwater Infiltration
RDI/I = Rainfall-Dependent Infiltration and Inflow
PD = Proposed Development

QD = Design Flow
QM = The Monitored Peak Flow or 2.5 times the Monitored Average Flow, whichever is greater.

QWWGWI = The gpd/acre value is obtained by using Figure 3-3 on page 3-5 (see Exhibit “D” of this Design Criteria ) and Table 3 -2 on page 3-11 (see Exhibit “E” of this Design Criteria ) of the Sanitary Sewer Capacity Assessment Report, May 2007.

Multiply the factor by the Tributary Area served by the sanitary sewer main being monitored.

QRDI/I = Same as QWWGWI above. For now, use 1,000 gpd/acre.

QPD = Proposed Development Peak Flow.

5.5 At all changes of direction, a drop in flow line shall be installed equal to the velocity head times the ratio of angular change to 90 degrees.

V2
2g x Ao
90o = Head Loss = drop in flow line*
~ 14 ~
City of Santa Clara Public Works Department
Design Criteria

EXHIBIT D
Figure 3-3 of Sanitary Sewer Capacity Assessment Report, May 2007

~ 35 ~
1601 Civic
Center Drive
City of Santa Clara Public Works Department
Design Criteria

EXHIBIT E
Table 3-2 of Sanitary Sewer Capacity Assessment Report, May 2007 ~ 36 ~
City of Santa Clara Water & Sewer Utility
Sewer System Management Plan
Approved by City Council: Resolution # [TBA]
City of Santa Clara Sanitary Sewer Capacity Assessment Chapter 2 Land Use and Flow Estimates May 2007 2-9
Table 2-5 Base Wastewater Flow Unit Flow Factors
Type of Development Unit Flow Factor Basis
Single Family Detached 245 gpd/DU 3.5 people/DU @ 70 gpcd Townhouses/Condominiums 175 gpd/DU 2.5 people/DU @ 70 gpcd Apartments 154 gpd/DU 2.2 people/DU @ 70 gpcd
Hotels 100 gpd/room
Commercial/Office 0.1 gpd/sq. ft.

Office/R&D 0.15 gpd/sq. ft.

Moderate Density Residential
(Mixed Use) 3,200 gpd/acre 21 DU/acre @154 gpd/DU
Medium Density Residential
(Transit-Oriented Mixed Use) 4,600 gpd/acre 30 DU/acre @ 154 gpd/DU Commercial/Office/R&D
Intensification
a + 300 gpd/acre + 0.04 FAR @ 0.15 gpd/sq. ft.
(a) Applied to areas of North Santa Clara where existing development is anticipated to increase in intensity from a current average floor-area-ratio (FAR) of 0.41 to a future average of 0.45.

2.3.3 Diurnal Base Wastewater Flow Patterns
In most sewer systems, BWF exhibits typical diurnal patterns depending on the type of land use. For Santa Clara, typical diurnal curves were developed for residential, commercial, and industrial areas, for both weekend and weekday conditions. These curves are shown in Figure 2-4. Each area of the system was assigned a diurnal curve according to its predominant land use type.

APPENDIX K

2009 SANITARY SEWER CAPACITY ASSESSMENT

City of Santa Clara
Sanitary Sewer Capacity Assessment for General Plan Update DRAFT

September 1, 2009
4 Table 2-1: Base Wastewater Unit Flow Factors
Land Use Unit Flow Factor Basis
Low Density Residential 245 gpd/DUa 2007 Capacity Assessment Medium Density Residential 154 gpd/DU 2007 Capacity Assessment High Density Residential 154 gpd/DU 2007 Capacity Assessment Retail & Residential b 154 gpd/DU 2007 Capacity Assessment Commercial c 0.1 gpd/sq. ft.d 2007 Capacity Assessment
Hotel 0.48 gpd/sq. ft. Standard Unit Flow Factor per SJ/SC WPCP e Industrial/Office/R&Df (higher intensity) 0.15 gpd/sq. ft. 2007 Capacity Assessment Warehouse Manufacturing 0.052 gpd/sq. ft. Standard Unit Flow Factor per SJ/SC WPCP Public/Institutional 0.15 gpd/sq.ft Assumed to be similar to Office/R&D uses Parks/Recreation -- Assumed to generate little or no flow

a. gpd/DU = gallons per day per dwelling unit
b. Flow assumed to be primarily residential
c. Including neighborhood and regional commercial services, retail, office, and auto sales d. gpd/sq. ft. = gallons per day per square foot of building floor space e. SJ/SC WPCP = San Jose / Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant f. R&D = Research & Development

In some cases, the demolition of existing development was identified by City staff. In these cases, the estimated flow from the existing development was subtracted out from the model baseline flow.

In general, the BWF generated by a development parcel was calculated as follow:

BWF = (Size of New Development x Unit Flow Factor) – (Demolition of Existing Development x Unit Flow Factor) A table of the computed BWF for each sewer subbasin can be found in Appendix B.

Table 2-2 shows the estimated average dry weather flow (ADWF), peak dry weather flow (PDWF), and peak wet weather flow (PWWF) for each of the three General Plan Update phases. As per the 2007 Capacity Assessment, flows from Cupertino Sanitary District were included in the model up to the District’s contracted maximum capacity in the City’s sewer system.

Table 2-2: Summary of Wastewater Flow Estimates
Scenario ADWF a
(MGD)
PDWF a
(MGD)
PWWF b
(MGD)
Phase 1 26.8 34.9 53.5
Phase 2 28.7 37.2 56.0
Phase 3 30.6 39.5 57.8

a. ADWF and PDWF represent a non-rainfall wintertime condition and include groundwater infiltration. b. PWWF represents peak flow for a 10-year frequency design storm.

K - 5

V&A Consulting Engineers | www.vaengineering.com | Oakland • Houston • San Diego • Florida • San A n tonio

V&A Project No. 21-0341

1000 Broadway, Suite 320
Oakland, CA 94607
510.903.6600
510.903.6601 Fax

DRAFT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

Civic Center Family Housing Project

CITY OF SANTA CLARA

P R E F A C E
Civic Center Family Housing Project ii City of Santa Clara

Section 21081 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a Lead Agency to adopt a Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program whenever it approves a project for which measures have been required to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The purpose of the monitoring or reporting program is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation.

On _____, the City Council approved the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Civic Center Drive Family Housing Project. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded that the implementation of the project could result in significant effects on the environment and mitigation measures were incorporated into the proposed project or are required as a condition of project approval. This Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program addresses those measures in terms of how and when they will be implemented.

This document does not discuss those subjects for which the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded that mitigation measures would not be required to reduce significant impacts.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 1 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
Civic Center Family Housing Project
Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
Air Quality
MM AIR-1.1: All construction equipment larger than 25 horsepower used at the site for more than two continuous days or 20 hours total shall meet U.S. EPA Tier 4 emission standards for particulate matter (PM) (PM10 and PM2.5). If use of Tier 4 equipment is not available, alternatively use equipment that meets U.S. EPA emission standards for Tier 2 or 3 engines and include particulate matter emissions control equivalent to California Air Resources Board (CARB) Level 3 verifiable diesel emission control devices that altogether achieve a 60 percent reduction in particulate matter exhaust in comparison to uncontrolled equipment; alternatively (or in combination), use of electrical or non-diesel fueled equipment.

During all phases of
construction
Project applicant Director of
Community
Development or
the Director’s
designee
Biological Resources
MM BIO-1.1: Construction shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season to the extent feasible. The nesting season for most birds, including most raptors, in the San Francisco Bay Area extends from February 1st through August 31st.

If it is not possible to schedule construction and tree removal between September and January, then pre-construction surveys for nesting birds shall be completed by a qualified ornithologist to ensure that no nests are disturbed during project implementation. This survey shall be completed no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of grading, tree removal, or other construction activities during the early part of the breeding season (February through April) and no more than 30 days prior to the initiation of these activities during the late part of the breeding season (May through August).

During this survey, the ornithologist shall inspect trees and other possible nesting habitats within and immediately adjacent to the construction area for nests. If an active nest is found sufficiently close to work areas to be disturbed by construction, Avoidance:

September 1 through
January 31.

Otherwise, 14 days
prior to initiation of
grading, tree
removal, or other
construction
activities during the
early part of the
breeding season
(February through
April) and no more
than 30 days prior to
the initiation of
Project applicant

Director of
Community
Development or
the Director’s
designee

California
Department of
Fish and Game

Civic Center Family Housing Project 2 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
Civic Center Family Housing Project
Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
the ornithologist, in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), shall determine the extent of a construction-free buffer zone to be established around the nest to ensure that bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) or Fish and Game Code shall not be disturbed during project construction.
these activities
during the late part
of the breeding
season (May through
August).

Cultural Resources
MM CUL-2.1: Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, an Archaeological Monitoring Plan shall be developed, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, and implemented to guide the project should any significant archaeological deposits be uncovered during construction. The Archaeological Monitoring Plan shall provide detailed guidance for how impact areas should be methodically excavated under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist. A qualified archaeologist and a representative from the local Native American community shall monitor all initial ground-disturbing activities.

MM CUL-2.2: A qualified archaeologist shall monitor the demolition of the building foundations and any other below surface disturbances, such as but not limited to, grading, excavation, trenching, potholing for utilities, utility removal, and addressing storm drain issues.

MM CUL-2.3: In the event that buried, or previously unrecognized archaeological deposits or materials of any kind are inadvertently exposed during any construction activity, work within 50 feet of the find shall cease until a qualified archaeologist and a representative from the local Native American community can assess the find and provide recommendations for further treatment, if warranted. Preservation in place is the preferred treatment of an archeological resource. When preservation in place of an archeological resource is not feasible, data recovery, in accord with a data recovery plan prepared and adopted by the City, is the appropriate mitigation. Construction and Prior to issuance of
grading permits, and
during demolition of
building foundations
and all ground
disturbing activities.

Project applicant Director of
Community
Development or
the Director’s
designee

Civic Center Family Housing Project 3 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
Civic Center Family Housing Project
Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
potential impacts to the area within a radius determined by the archaeologist shall not recommence until the assessment is complete.

MM CUL-3.1: In the event that human remains and/or grave goods are discovered or recognized during ground-disturbing activities or construction, all ground disturbance work shall cease within 50 feet of the discovery, and the tribal monitor shall immediately notify the construction supervisor. The construction supervisor shall ensure reasonable protection measures are taken to protect the discovery from disturbance (Assembly Bill [AB] 2641) and shall immediately notify the City and the Santa Clara County Medical Examiner-Coroner (per California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5). If the remains are determined to be Native American, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) immediately.

Once the NAHC identifies the most likely descendants, the descendants will make recommendations regarding proper burial, which will be implemented in accordance with Section 15064.5(e) of the CEQA Guidelines.

• Reburial shall be conducted within a cultural easement to be identified on the project plans, or on tribal or other lands that will not be disturbed in the future.

• Reburial of human remains shall be accomplished in compliance with California Public Resources Code Sections 5097.98(a) and (b).

During all ground
disturbing activities.

Project applicant Director of
Community
Development or
the Director’s
designee

Santa Clara
County Medical
Examiner-
Coroner

Native American
Heritage
Commission
Geology and Soils
MM GEO-2.1: All excavation and grading work would be scheduled in dry weather months or construction sites would be weatherized8F14F (refers to measures that would protect exposed soils from rain and stormwater runoff) to withstand or avoid erosion.

MM GEO-2.2: Stockpiles and excavated soils would be covered with secured tarps or plastic sheeting.

During all phases of
construction.

Project applicant

City of Santa
Clara’s Building
Division

Civic Center Family Housing Project 4 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
Civic Center Family Housing Project
Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation

MM GEO-2.3: Vegetation in disturbed areas would be replanted as quickly as possible.

Noise and Vibration
MM NOI-2.1: The project applicant or the applicant’s contractor shall implement the following measures during construction to reduce construction vibration generated by the project:

• Limit vibration-inducing equipment to the extent feasible.

• Where possible, use of the heavy vibration-generating construction equipment shall be prohibited within 20 feet of the adjacent building to the west and to the north.

• Use a smaller vibratory roller, such as the Caterpillar model CP433E vibratory compactor, when compacting materials within 20 feet of adjacent structures.

• Modify/design or identify alternative construction methods to reduce vibration levels below the limits.

• Alternative methods for breaking up existing pavement, such as a pavement grinder, shall be used instead of dropping heavy objects, within 20 feet of adjacent buildings.

During all phases of
construction.

Project applicant
or the
applicant’s
contractor
Director of
Community
Development or
the Director’s
designee

Civic Center Family Housing Project 5 City of Santa Clara In addition to mitigation measures listed above, there are also other conditions of approval the project shall implement, including the following:

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Construction Dust Generation
• All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. • All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered. • All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.
• All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour (mph). • All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
• Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of the California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. • All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. • Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number of the on-site project superintendent to contact regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

Lead and Asbestos Removal
• In conformance with state and local laws, a visual inspection/pre-demolition survey, and possible sampling, shall be conducted prior to the demolition of on-site buildings to determine the presence of asbestos-containing materials and/or lead-based paint. • Prior to demolition activities, all building materials containing lead-based paint shall be removed in accordance with Cal/OSHA Lead in Construction Standard, Title 8, California Code of Regulations 1532.1, including employee training, employee air monitoring, and dust control.

Any debris or soil containing lead-based paint or coatings would be disposed of at landfills that meet acceptance criteria for the waste being disposed.
• All potentially friable ACMs shall be removed in accordance with National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) guidelines prior to any building demolition or renovation that may disturb the materials. All demolition activities will be undertaken in accordance with Cal/OSHA standards contained in Title 8 of CCR, Section 1529, to protect workers from exposure to asbestos.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 6 City of Santa Clara

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
• A registered asbestos abatement contractor shall be retained to remove and dispose of ACMs identified in the asbestos survey performed for the site in accordance with the standards stated above.
• Materials containing more than one percent asbestos are also subject to BAAQMD regulations. Removal of materials containing more than one percent asbestos shall be completed in accordance with BAAQMD requirements.

Construction Water Quality
• Burlap bags filled with drain rock shall be installed around storm drains to route sediment and other debris away from the drains. • Earthmoving or other dust-producing activities shall be suspended during periods of high winds. • All exposed or disturbed soil surfaces shall be watered at least twice daily to control dust, as necessary. • Stockpiles of soil or other materials that can be blown by the wind shall be watered or covered. • All trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials shall be required to cover all trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard. • All paved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas adjacent to the construction sites shall be swept daily (with water sweepers). • Vegetation in disturbed areas shall be replanted as quickly as possible. • All unpaved entrances to the site shall be filled with rock to knock mud from truck tires prior to entering City streets. A tire wash system may also be employed at the request of the City.

Post-Construction Water Quality
• When the construction phase is complete, a Notice of Termination (NOT) for the General Permit for Construction will be filed with the RWQCB and the City of Santa Clara. The NOT shall document that all elements of the SWPPP have been executed, construction materials and waste have been properly disposed of, and a post-construction stormwater management plan is in place as described in the SWPPP for the project site. • All post-construction Treatment Control Measures (TCMs) shall be installed, operated, and maintained by qualified personnel. On-site inlets will be cleaned out at a minimum of once per year, prior to the wet season. • The property owner/site manager shall keep a maintenance and inspection schedule and record to ensure the TCMs continue to operate effectively for the life of the project. Copies of the schedule and record must be provided to the City upon request and must be made available for inspection on-site at all times.
• When the construction phase is complete, a Notice of Termination (NOT) for the General Permit for Construction will be filed with the RWQCB and the City of Santa Clara. The NOT shall document that all elements of the SWPPP have been executed, construction materials and waste have been properly disposed of, and a post-construction stormwater management plan is in place as described in the SWPPP for the project site.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 7 City of Santa Clara

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
• All post-construction Treatment Control Measures (TCMs) shall be installed, operated, and maintained by qualified personnel. On-site inlets will be cleaned out at a minimum of once per year, prior to the wet season. • The property owner/site manager shall keep a maintenance and inspection schedule and record to ensure the TCMs continue to operate effectively for the life of the project. Copies of the schedule and record must be provided to the City upon request and must be made available for inspection on-site at all times.

Construction Noise
• Ensure that excavating, grading and filling activities, and other construction activities (including the loading and unloading of materials and truck movements) within 300 feet of residentially zoned property, including hotel properties, are limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No construction is permitted on Sundays or holidays.

• Construct temporary noise barriers, where feasible, to screen stationary noise-generating equipment. Temporary noise barrier fences would provide a 5 dBA noise reduction if the noise barrier interrupts the line-of-sight between the noise source and receptor and if the barrier is constructed in a manner that eliminates any cracks or gaps.

• Equip all internal combustion engine-driven equipment with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment.

• Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines shall be prohibited.

• Locate stationary noise-generating equipment, such as air compressors or portable power generators, as far as possible from sensitive receptors as feasible. If they must be located near receptors, adequate muffling (with enclosures where feasible and appropriate) shall be used to reduce noise levels at the adjacent sensitive receptors. Any enclosure openings or venting shall face away from sensitive receptors.

• Utilize "quiet" air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists.

• Construction staging areas shall be established at locations that will create the greatest distance between the construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.

• Locate material stockpiles, as well as maintenance/equipment staging and parking areas, as far as feasible from residential receptors.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 8 City of Santa Clara

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

• Route construction-related traffic along major roadways and as far as feasible from sensitive receptors.

• Control noise from construction workers’ radios to a point where they are not audible at existing residences bordering the project site.

• The contractor shall prepare a detailed construction schedule for major noise-generating construction activities. The construction plan shall include notification to adjacent residential land uses of scheduled construction activities.

• Designate a "disturbance coordinator" who would be responsible for responding to any complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator will determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., bad muffler, etc.) and will require that reasonable measures be implemented to correct the problem. Conspicuously post a telephone number for the disturbance coordinator at the construction site and include in it the notice sent to neighbors regarding the construction schedule.

Sources: City of Santa Clara. Draft Initial Study for the Civic Center Family Housing Project. June 2022.

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS

The Civic Center Family Housing Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared and evaluated in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Santa Clara. The Initial Study/MND was circulated for 30 days from June 13 to July 12, 2022. The City received eight comment letters during the public comment period:

Comment Letters Received by the City from State, County, or Local agencies:

A. Department of Toxic Substances Control July 8, 2022 B. Valley Water July 8, 2022
C. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority July 12, 2022 C. Sneha Shah July 6, 2022
D. Keyhan Sinai July 6, 2022
F. Jamie Lau July 11, 2022
G Jean Song July 12, 2022
H. David Bayto July 12, 2022

This memo responses to public comments on the Initial Study/MND as they relate to the potential environmental impacts of the project under CEQA. Numbered responses correspond to comments in each comment letter. Copies of all comment letters are attached.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 2 Response to Comments Memo Comment Letter A: Department of Toxic Substances Control – July 8, 2022

Comment A-1: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) received a Notice of Availability of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Civic Center Drive Family Housing Project (Project). The Lead Agency is receiving this notice from DTSC because the Project includes one or more of the following: groundbreaking activities, work in close proximity to a roadway, presence of site buildings that may require demolition or modifications, importation of backfill soil, and/or work on or in close proximity to an agricultural or former agricultural site.

DTSC recommends that the following issues be evaluated in the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section of the MND:

1. The MND should acknowledge the potential for historic or future activities on or near the Project site to result in the release of hazardous wastes/substances on the Project site. In instances where releases have occurred or may occur, further studies should be carried out to delineate the nature and extent of the contamination, and the potential threat to public health and/or the environment should be evaluated. Section 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials of the Draft Initial Study prepared by the City of Santa Clara dated June 2022 makes reference to a Phase II Subsurface Investigation prepared by Professional Service Industries, Inc. in February 2022, but the data presented therein is not available for review as this document does not appear to be included in the Draft Initial Study. The MND should also identify the mechanism(s) to initiate any required investigation and/or remediation and the government agency who will be responsible for providing appropriate regulatory oversight.

Response A-1: DTSC is correct that the Phase II was not included in the distributed materials. The document has been provided to DTSC for review and posted to the State Clearinghouse. The findings of the Phase II are, however, summarized on page 81 of the Initial Study. As stated in the Initial Study:

“A total of 10 soil borings were taken on the project site with soil samples taken at one and four feet bgs. Groundwater was not encountering in any soil borings. The samples were tested for chlorinated pesticides and one sample was found to have a measurable concentration of DDE at 0.054 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). The RWQCB Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for residential land uses have a threshold of 0.65 mg/kg. The level of contamination documented on-site is below the ESL residential threshold.”

Furthermore, as explained on page 82 of the Initial Study, no off-site releases have impacted the project site. The analysis concluded that construction and operation of the proposed project would have a less than significant hazards and hazardous materials impact.

Furthermore, the project was found to be consistent with all applicable City policies pertaining to potential safety risks for future site residents and hazardous materials.

Therefore, no mitigation or oversight is required.

Comment A-2: 2. Refiners in the United States started adding lead compounds to gasoline in the 1920s in order to boost octane levels and improve engine performance. This practice did not officially end until 1992 when lead was banned as a fuel additive in California. Tailpipe emissions from automobiles using leaded gasoline contained lead and resulted in aerially deposited lead (ADL)being deposited in and alongside roadways throughout the state. ADL-contaminated soils still exist along roadsides and medians and can also be found under some existing road surfaces due to Civic Center Family Housing Project 3 Response to Comments Memo past construction activities. Due to the potential for ADL-contaminated soil, DTSC recommends collecting soil samples for lead analysis prior to preforming any intrusive activities for the Project described in the MND.

Response A-2: As a Condition of Approval, the City will require soil sampling for lead prior to issuance of a grading permit.

Comment A-3: 3. If buildings or other structures are to be demolished on any project sites including in the proposed project, surveys should be conducted for the presence of lead-based paints or products, mercury, asbestos containing materials, and polychlorinated biphenyl caulk. Removal, demolition and disposal of any of the above-mentioned chemicals should be conducted in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies. In addition, sampling near current and/or former buildings should be conducted in accordance with DTSC’s 2006 Interim Guidance Evaluation of School Sites with Potential Contamination from Lead Based Paint, Termiticides, and Electrical Transformers.

Response A-3: Page 81 of the Initial Study addresses the potential for lead-based paint and asbestos containing materials to be on-site due to the age of the existing building. Page 86 of the Initial Study outlines the Conditions of Project Approval required by the project to address these contaminants consistent with Cal/OSHA and Bay Area Air Quality Management District regulations. The Phase I did not identify polychlorinated biphenyls or mercury as an environmental condition.

Comment A-4: 4. If any projects initiated as part of the proposed Project require the importation of soil to backfill any excavated areas, proper sampling should be conducted to ensure that the imported soil is free of contamination. DTSC recommends the imported materials be characterized according to DTSC’s 201 Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material.

Response A-4: The commenters recommendation to require sampling of imported fill (if any is required) consistent with DTSC’s 201 Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material will be provided to the decision-makers during consideration of the proposed project.

Comment A-5: 5. If any sites included as part of the proposed Project have been used for agricultural, weed abatement or related activities, proper investigation for organochlorinated pesticides should be discussed in the MND. DTSC recommends the current and former agricultural lands be evaluated in accordance with DTSC’s 2008 Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision).

Response A-5: As discussed in Response A-1, 10 soil borings were taken on the project site and tested for chlorinated pesticides. Only one sample was found to have a measurable concentration of DDE at 0.054 mg/kg, which is below the ESL residential threshold.

Comment A-6: DTSC appreciates the opportunity to comment on the MND. Should you need any assistance with an environmental investigation, please visit DTSC’s Site Mitigation and Restoration Program page to apply for lead agency oversight. Additional information regarding voluntary agreements with DTSC can be found at DTSC’s Brownfield website.

Response A-6: This comment is noted.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 4 Response to Comments Memo Comment Letter B: Valley Water – July 8, 2022

Comment B-1: Valley Water has reviewed the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Civic Center Drive Family Housing Project, received on June 10, 2022. Valley Water has the following comments on the subject IS/MND document:

1. Section 4.10.1.1- Municipal Regional Permit Provision C.3 should note that the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) has renewed the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit on May 11, 2022 (Order No. R2-2022-0018, NPDES Permit No.

CAS612008).

Response B-1: This edit is incorporated into the Initial Study/MND by reference. See the attached errata sheet.

Comment B-2: 2. Section 4.10.1.1- Water Resources Protection Ordinance and Well Ordinance, the text should also include: “Valley Water also provides stream stewardship and is the wholesale water supplier throughout the county, which includes the groundwater recharge program.”

Response B-2: This edit is incorporated into the Initial Study/MND by reference. See the attached errata sheet.

Comment B-3: 3. Section 4.10.1.1- Water Resources Protection Ordinance and Well Ordinance, the language under this section should be revised to clarify that well construction and deconstruction permits, including borings 45 feet or deeper, are required under Valley Water’s Well Ordinance 90-1.

Under Valley Water’s Water Resources Protection Ordinance, projects within Valley Water property or easements are required to obtain encroachment permits.

Response B-3: This edit is incorporated into the Initial Study/MND by reference. See the attached errata sheet.

Comment B-4: 4. Section 4.10.1.1- 2016 Groundwater Management Plan, this section includes a subsection on Valley Water’s 2016 Groundwater Management Plan. The subsection should be updated to reference Valley Water’s updated 2021 Groundwater Management Plan which was adopted by the Board of Directors on November 21, 2021. The updated plan can be found at https://s3.uswest2.amazonaws.com/assets.valleywater.org/2021_GWMP_web_version.pdf.

Response B-4: This edit is incorporated into the Initial Study/MND by reference. See the attached errata sheet.

Comment B-5: 5. Section 4.10.1.2- Storm Drain System, states that the project site drains to a vegetated channel based on Valley Water’s Storm Drain Catchment Map. Valley Water’s catchment map notes the site drains to the Guadalupe River; however, it is not clear from the discussions in the MND if the drainage from the site is directed to storm drains that discharge to the Guadalupe River or San Tomas Creek. Please revise the document for consistency and accuracy.

Response B-5: The Initial Study/MND will be edited to correct the reference to Guadalupe River. See the attached errata sheet.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 5 Response to Comments Memo Comment B-6: 6. Section 4.10.1.2- Stormwater Drainage, states that “all stormwater enters Guadalupe River through the existing stormwater discharge system” which conflicts with Section

4.10.1.2 on page 93 which states that “all stormwater enters the San Tomas Aquino Creek through the existing stormwater drainage system”. The discussion about drainage at the site should be consistent throughout the document.

Response B-6: Refer to Response B-5.

Comment B-7: 7. Section 4.10.1.2- Dam Failure and Section 4.10.2- Impact HYF-4, describes the project as within both the Lexington Dam and Anderson Dam failure inundation zones; however, the project site is only located within the James J. Lenihan Dam on Lexington Reservoir failure inundation zone. Anderson Dam should be removed from the discussion.

Response B-7: The Initial Study/MND is correct as written. Page 94 and 99 of the Initial Study/MND specifically state that the site is outside the Anderson Dame inundation zone.

Comment B-8: 8. Section 4.21- Cumulative Hydrology Impacts, states “the geographic area for the cumulative hydrology and water quality impacts is the San Tomas Aquino Creek Watershed”. This should be corrected to the Guadalupe River Watershed.

Response B-8: This edit is incorporated into the Initial Study/MND by reference. See the attached errata sheet.

Comment B-9: 9. The buildout of the project will increase water use by an estimated 36 acre-feet per year. Although the MND concludes that the project can be accommodated by existing and planned water sources, given regional and state-wide challenges with water supply, water use should still be reduced to the greatest extent possible. Potential opportunities to minimize water and associated energy use include requiring water conservation measures from the Model Water Efficient New Development Ordinance, which include:

• Hot water recirculation systems.
• Require installation of separate submeters to each unit in multi-family developments and individual spaces within commercial buildings to encourage efficient water use - studies have shown that adding submeters can reduce water use by 15 to 30 percent. • Graywater dual distribution plumbing.
• Encourage non-potable reuse of water like recycled water, graywater, and rainwater/stormwater in new development and remodels through the installation of dual plumbing for irrigation, toilet flushing, cooling towers, and other non-potable water uses. • Require dedicated landscape meters where applicable.
• Weather- or soil-based irrigation controllers.

If you have any questions, you may reach me at (408) 630-2479, or by e-mail at [email protected]. Please reference District File No. 34738 on future correspondence regarding this project.

Response B-9: The commenter’s recommendations for reducing water usage on-site will be provided to the decision-makers. This comment does not speak to the adequacy of the Initial Study/MND, and no text edits are required.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 6 Response to Comments Memo Comment Letter C: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority – July 12, 2022

Comment C-1: VTA appreciates the opportunity to comment on the IS/MND for the Civic Center Drive Family Housing Project at 1601 Civic Center Drive. VTA has reviewed the document and has the following comments:

Pedestrian Improvements
This project is located one block from El Camino Real, VTA’s highest ridership roadway. VTA recommends this project install or upgrade existing crosswalks at the Civic Center Drive/Lincoln Street intersection to high visibility to facilitate more comfortable crossings at this intersection. As this intersection is also skewed, VTA suggests the long crossings be shortened through curb extensions with to help tighten the turning radii and slow drivers down in the area. Installing a curb extension at the northwest corner of the intersection would provide room for new ADA-compliant directional curb ramps that would serve both crosswalks. This should enhance the proposed improvements in the city’s Pedestrian Master Plan for the intersection of Lincoln Street/El Camino Real, one block south.

Response C-1: The commenter’s recommendations for pedestrian improvements will be provided to the decision-makers. This comment does not speak to the adequacy of the Initial Study/MND, and no text edits are required.

Comment C-2: Bicycle Improvements
VTA appreciates the project including a bicycle storage room for residents. VTA recommends the project increase the number of available spaces to at least match 1 space per unit (108 spaces) to meet VTA’s recommended bicycle parking guidance in Chapter 10 of our Bicycle Technical Guidelines. This can be accessed at https://www.vta.org/sites/default/files/2022- 03/vta_bicycle_technical_guidelines_complete_1.pdf.

The Revised Development Plans from May 2022 show that the bicycle room is located on the east side of the building. VTA recommends the access from the room directly out to Lincoln Street be removed to reduce the risk of theft. Doing so will allow for more wall space to fit more bicycle spaces. VTA also recommends that the door into the room from the garage have ADA-compliant kick plates to automatically open. Industrial strength sliding doors are recommended over swinging doors as the closing of the door can be timed for ADA compliance while also helping to prevent unwanted people from tailgating behind users. The path of travel should be well lit. Any elevators for the project should accommodate multiple large bicycles.

Response C-2: The commenter’s recommendations for bicycle improvements will be provided to the decision-makers. This comment does not speak to the adequacy of the Initial Study/MND, and no text edits are required.

Comment C-3: AHSC Grant Potential
VTA believes this project would be highly competitive for the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Grant administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. The AHSC Grant funds land-use, housing, transportation, and land preservation projects to support infill and compact development that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. VTA would like to begin working with the City and the developer to strategize for an AHSC application because this project proposes a high number of affordable housing units near Route 22 and Rapid 522 routes that are major bus corridors and frequent (15 minute) routes. Close collaboration between Civic Center Family Housing Project 7 Response to Comments Memo developer, City of Santa Clara and VTA can make for a highly competitive application. VTA has had two calls to date with the developer and their technical assistance provider Enterprise Community Partners. VTA has experience working on five AHSC applications to date, include two awards in 2019 in partnership with the City of San Jose and one award in 2021 for a VTA project in San Jose at Tamien Station.

Potential El Camino Real Qualifiable AHSC Improvements
• Transit signal priority upgrades
• Bus stop enhancements
• ADA improvements near bus stops
• Protected bikeway enhancements
• Intersection safety enhancements
• Sidewalk improvements

Santa Clara Station Qualifiable AHSC Improvements
Recent discussions and briefings have occurred between the BART Silicon Valley II program team and VTA planning about future coordination of bicycle and pedestrian station amenity improvements at the Santa Clara Station. Qualifiable AHSC improvements could be included in a 1601 Civic Center Drive AHSC grant at this location because Route 22 and Rapid 522 both serve the station.

Potential improvements could include the following:
• Bicycle ramps
• Escalator installation or improvements
• Bus stop enhancements
• Real-time information signs
• Marketing or advertising signs
• Gateway, signage or customer wayfinding enhancements

Response C-1: If the project is approved and the grant opportunities are sought, the City will coordinate with the VTA. This comment does not speak to the adequacy of the Initial Study/MND, and no text edits are required.

Comment Letter D: Sneha Shah – July 6, 2022

Comment D-1: I am greatly concerned and absolutely condemn the new construction proposed by Charities Housing at 1601 Civic Center Dr, Santa Clara. They are not ethical and have provided no due diligence to the property and are an absolute nuisance as a neighbor.

Their environmental study of the project is an example of their bad ethics and lack of diligence. Our neighbors have the following concerns that should be addressed, otherwise we feel the city and council have failed us.

• Transportation Study recommends the project to have only one driveway entrance to reduce pedestrian and traffic safety risk. The project currently plans to have two driveways – one on Civic Center Drive adjacent to Triton Court, another one on Lincoln Street. Our community requests to have the driveway on Lincoln Street only and away from existing homes on Civic Center Drive. The developer was unable to accommodate it.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 8 Response to Comments Memo Response D-1: While the traffic study recommends one driveway, the City has concluded that two driveways are necessary due to site constraints and for distribution of traffic and to reduce noise.

Comment D-2: The security risks of the open parking lot adjacent to Triton Court are not considered in the environmental study. The open parking lot is currently not designed with any security gate and is out of sight from the main street. This can become a hidden alley for dumping, car break-ins and other criminal activities. Even if it is designed with a secured gate, according to posted tenant comments from other CH properties, broken security gates are not fixed promptly.

Response D-2: All proposed projects in the City undergo review by the Santa Clara Police Department (SCPD). The SCPD did not identify any issues with the proposed design. The driveway and parking lot would be visible at all times by the residents of the project site.

Furthermore, the proposed driveway and associated parking lot on Civic Center Drive has better visibility from publicly accessible viewpoints than the adjacent driveway and parking lot located between the church and Triton Court.

The commenter provided no documentation regarding the purported comments from other CH properties. As such, no evaluation of these comments can be made by the City and no response is possible.

Comment D-3: Transportation Study did not consider the sight distance for drivers coming out of Triton Court with the new driveway at Civic Center Drive from the project. Both driveways are very close together and may be a safety risk if the drivers from both driveways are coming out simultaneously.

Response D-3: The transportation study did address the potential conflicts from the proposed location of the driveways on-site. As discussed on Page 4 of the transportation study, drivers must be able to see 200 feet in both directions to be able to safely enter/exit the proposed driveways. The project would meet this criterion. The project drive on Civic Center Drive would also be approximately 100 feet from cars exiting Triton Court. Given the site distances and the distance between exiting cars at both driveways, the proposed project would not create a safety risk for persons exiting Triton Court.

Comment D-4: Parking study was not considered as part of the environmental study. Project's less than 1:1 parking space to unit ratio will burden the existing street parking situation. Also, the project may eliminate many street parking along its frontage at Civic Center Drive as it could be red-zoned for sight clearance, while some for white-zoned for loading as recommended by the Transportation Study.

Response D-4: Parking or lack thereof is not considered a physical effect under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is, therefore, not addressed. A project need only meet the City’s parking requirements. The potential loss of street parking is also not a physical effect under CEQA. Per the Santa Clara Fire Department and Public Works, the City will allow a loading zone and will require the red curbs as recommended by the traffic report.

Comment D-5: Shadow study was not considered at all, though there is a negative impact to the adjacent family homes.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 9 Response to Comments Memo Response D-5: The City of Santa Clara does not have a threshold by which to address increased shading by any project. Therefore, shading was not addressed in the Initial Study.

Comment D-6: Noise Study uses a noise threshold (90 dBA) from a 2018 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) assessment as a criteria to determine construction noise impact to residential homes. The FTA assessment noted its criteria is not meant as construction standards for all, but CH's noise study decided to use that on a residential project study. FTA projects are mostly construction for transportation projects like train stations and rail lines in populated areas, the guidelines are therefore likely to have a higher noise threshold. This standard may not be suitable for the 1601 Civic Center site. The noise study should have used residential construction guidelines from similar projects in kind, and considered the delta to existing ambient noise instead. The study has used 90 dBA as a threshold and that's equivalent to a lawn mower.

Response D-6: The noise study was commissioned by the environmental consultant under direction by City staff. The project applicant has no authority over the analysis in the Initial Study/MND or the methodologies used in the analysis.

The commenter mischaracterized the language in the FTA manual. Chapter 7, page 172 of the PDF document (https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research- innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no- 0123_0.pdf) specifically states:
“Generally, local noise ordinances are not very useful for evaluating construction noise impact. They usually relate to nuisance and hours of allowed activity, and sometimes specify limits in terms of maximum levels, but are generally not practical for assessing the impact of a construction project. Project construction noise criteria should take into account the existing noise environment, the absolute noise levels during construction activities, the duration of the construction, and the adjacent land uses. While it is not the purpose of this manual to specify standardized criteria for construction noise impact, the following guidelines can be considered reasonable criteria for assessment. If these criteria are exceeded, there may be adverse community reaction.”

As discussed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(b), the determination of whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment calls for judgment on the part of the lead agency and must be based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data. The City of Santa Clara does not have adopted construction noise thresholds. As such, the City and the noise consultant concluded that the FTA thresholds represent reasonable criteria to quantify construction noise impacts, consistent with other local jurisdictions. This is an accepted industry standard, in the absence of local criteria. Therefore, the thresholds and methodology used to assess construction noise impacts from the proposed project are appropriate.

Comment D-7: The permanent noise impact study did not consider the scenario when a car with loud exhaust and building fire alarms can affect permanent noise level of adjacent homes. Also, delivery trucks and moving trucks coming in and out frequently on the Civic Center Driveway were not considered.

Response D-7: Both car exhaust and building fire alarms are temporary noise events. In order for either of these events to result in a permanent increase in ambient noise levels, these events would have to occur non-stop over an extended time period (multiple hours) every day. This is not an accurate or reasonable representation of a residential project. CEQA does not allow for speculative analysis (Section 15145).

Civic Center Family Housing Project 10 Response to Comments Memo It is not clear what the commenter considers frequent with regard to delivery trucks and moving trucks, but it would be speculative to assume that the proposed project would have any greater frequency of these types of events than other types of housing as this is not temporary housing.

Comment D-8: The environmental study did not consider the project's architectural aesthetic to the surrounding due to being an affordable high-density housing. In some neighbor's opinions, The 5- story building does not fit in with the adjacent 2-story homes, or surrounding homes.

Response D-8: As discussed on page 19 of the Initial Study, the project side is located in a transit priority area as designated by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). Consistent with state law, residential in- fill projects in transit priority areas shall not be considered to have a significant aesthetic impact on the environment. Furthermore, while the houses immediately adjacent to the project site are two-story, there are three-story townhouses and a seven-story apartment complex in the immediate vicinity (Civic Center Drive and Warburton). As a result, a five- story building would be consistent with the mix of residential densities in this area.

Comment D-9: The project is not close to a transit hub like a BART or Caltrain station. There's only bus stops nearby with infrequent services unless it's peak hours. Public transportation is not a reliable option for daily commute for work or school at this site. There is no bus route going to Buchser Middle School and Santa Clara High School.

Response D-9: The project site is within 1,000 feet of two bus stops which are served by Bus 22, the most active bus line in the County which runs from Palo Alto to East San José. Also, within 2,000 feet (standard transit access walking distance) are Routes 32, 59, and Rapid 522 (see page 142-143 of Initial Study). Bike lanes are also planned on El Camino Real. As such, the site is well suited for the proposed project as it is also within walking or biking distance to shopping and services on El Camino Real.

Comment D-10: The schools' existing capacity in the Initial Study was sourced from a 2017 data, which is about 5 years old. The Santa Clara High School enrollment is already operating over capacity according to the study with the old data. Also, to a neighbor's knowledge, Busher Middle School has no more space for newcomers as it does not accept a second round of enrollment for 2022, indicating operating at capacity. The school impact study may not be accurate due to old data being used. The mitigation for school impact is for the project to pay fees to the school district to offset the impact, but will the schools be able to implement changes to provide adequate spaces to neighborhood students?

Response D-10: Existing capacity is the number of students that can be reasonably accommodated by a school. None of the schools analyzed have been expanded or modified since 2017, so the existing capacity numbers provided by the school district are valid. Current enrollment numbers were provided by the California Department of Education and represent the best available data at the time the analysis was completed. As the commenter noted, the mitigation for additional students is to pay the school impact fee. School impact fees are discussed on Pages 129 and 134 of the Initial Study/MND. As noted on Page 129, “Government Code Sections 65995 through 65998 set forth provisions for the payment of school impact fees by new development by “mitigating impacts on school facilities that occur (as a result of the planning, use, or development of real property” (Section 65996[a]). The legislation states that the payment of school impact fees “are hereby deemed to provide full and complete school facilities mitigation” under CEQA (Section 65996[b]).”

Civic Center Family Housing Project 11 Response to Comments Memo Each school utilizes the monies as necessary to accommodate any additional students. As this is deemed appropriate and adequate mitigation by the state, no further mitigation is required.

Comment D-11: The project does not have underground parking as encouraged by City's General Plan guidelines.

Response D-11: General Plan Policy 5.3.2-P3 encourages but does not require below-grade or structured parking, so the proposed parking is not inconsistent with this policy.

Comment D-12: The general plan amendment and rezone from commercial to residential for 1601 Civic Center will permanently remove the commercial land use that was designated to serve the planned residential areas surrounding the location, as City Hall, church and medical building lots' planned use until 2035 is residential. The amendment and rezone of site in question does not align with City's General Plan and is shortsighted.

Response D-12: Changing a land use from commercial to residential in a mixed-use area with adjacent residential is not inconsistent with the existing development in the area.

Furthermore, the City has a jobs/housing imbalance (Page 126 of the Initial Study/MND) and must continue to build housing to meet state mandated housing requirements. Currently, the City must build 11,632 new housing units by 2031 under the Association of Bay Area Governments Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). The RNHA is mandated by state law.

Comment Letter E: Keyhan Sinai – July 6, 2022

Comment E-1: I hereby strongly and formally object to the "mitigated negative declaration " or MND prepared pursuant to CEQA, for the proposed 1601 Civic Center Drive project.

I believe there is not adequate mitigation for the problems below.

My home at 1691 Triton Ct. is identified as RED on page 36 of the MND report, and is wall-to-wall with 1601 Civic Center Drive. As I understand my home will be exposed to dangerously high cancer- causing agents from the construction site equipment for an extended period of time. We do not believe the mitigation measures proposed will reduce the risk of exposure to cancer and other toxic agents adequately or mitigate the risk of accidents and malfunctions. We do not feel safe breathing the air in our home if/when this project starts.

Response E-1: This comment is noted. Please see responses to specific comments below.

Comment E-2: Please note the following points:

1. Charities Housings Credit History of mitigation efforts is terrible. Their mitigation measures (a $2000 perimeter fence) came too late and exposed our homes for 13 months to petty crime and blight a few yards from our property line culminating in dumping of a toilet tank full of human feces within a few yards of our home which took them 4 days to clean. We suffered 4 days of intolerable odors and exposure to airborne bacteria and viruses from the dumped human feces during the peak of the Covid-19 crisis. Charities Housing was nowhere to be seen during any part of our 13 month ordeal to take any mitigation steps. FYI The dumping of feces was reported by us not them. Stating that we "did not know" makes matters worse (how can you not know for 13 long months?) and is proof of negligence, lack of accountability and a cavalier attitude towards neighbors' safety and well being. We have no reason to believe Charities Housing will take responsibility for the hazards and nuisance it has imposed or will impose upon its neighbors in Civic Center Family Housing Project 12 Response to Comments Memo the future. Hiding under the cover of a "mitigated negative declaration" does not absolve them of responsibility and does not address the true actual risks to us neighbors, with my home being one of the most impacted.

Response E-2: As stated on Page 1 of the Initial Study, the City of Santa Clara is the Lead Agency for this project and prepared the Initial Study/MND in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations §15000 et. seq.) and the regulations and policies of the City of Santa Clara, California. Project applicants are not involved in the preparation of the CEQA documents and are required through permitting processes and regulatory oversight to properly implement the mitigation measures and conditions of approval identified in the Initial Study/MND.

The intent and purpose of the Initial Study/MND is to provide the public and decisions- makers with an accounting of the physical environmental effects which may result from construction and implementation of the proposed project. The law does not allow for the CEQA analysis to address current operational issues of a property.

Comment E-3: 2. Absent 24/7 3rd-party monitoring of construction equipment we have no reason to believe we are safe from exposure to cancer causing agents. However, considering how cost sensitive (i.e. cheap) Charities Housing has been in the past, they will figure ways of making short cuts to the cost of preserving our safety and security. Even with a stringent monitoring regime the risks are too high as stated below:

3. Even with effective 24/7 3rd-party monitoring there is a high risk of industrial accidents, malfunctions, power loss or interruption in monitoring that will result in dangerously high exposure for finite periods of time with unpredictable and potentially horrendous long term effects.

Response E-3: It is assumed that the commenter is referring to the toxic air contaminants (TAC) analysis in the air quality report. As noted by the commenter in Comment E-1, Figure 1 of Appendix A shows the commenters house with a red circle on it. This denotes that this house would experience the highest concentration of emissions during construction on the project. As discussed on Pages 35-37 of the Initial Study/MND, the project will be required to implement mitigation measures to reduce emission impacts to this receptor and all other nearby receptors to a less than significant level. This means below the thresholds established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD).

While the air quality analysis did identify an impact which would exceed the BAAQMD thresholds, the BAAQMD thresholds are based on a 70-year exposure to the emissions, so the actual risk is far less than what is calculated for project construction. Construction is estimated to be 18 months. Also, the cancer risk impact is based on the respiratory rates of infants, which are different than children and adults. The analysis did not find an impact to children or adults.

The threshold established by BAAQMD for cancer risk is 10 cancer cases per one million people exposed. With mitigation the infant cancer risk is reduced to 5.99 cases per million people based on a 70-year exposure. For annual PM2.5 emissions, the BAAQMD threshold is

0.3 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3). With mitigation, the PM2.5 emissions would be reduced to 0.15 µg/m3. Therefore, with implementation of the identified mitigation measure on Page 36 of the Initial Study/MND, the proposed project would have a less than significant construction air quality impact on all adjacent and nearby sensitive receptors.

The mitigation would be enforced by the City. Furthermore, as noted on Page 33 of the Initial Study/MND (under Conditions of Approval), a publicly visible sign will be posted on-site Civic Center Family Housing Project 13 Response to Comments Memo with the numbers for the on-site project superintendent and the Air District to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

Comment E-4: 4. In addition, there will be 90db noise from the construction site a few yards away from our fence. The City code for maximum noise level in residential areas is 55db from 7am-10pm and 50db at night. Why are we being asked to put up with 90db noise a few yards from our home when the City noise code mandates significantly less noise levels by orders of magnitude? The Table below shows the difference in power (loudness) between 55db and 90db is more than 10000 times!

Response E-4: Refer to Response D-2.

Comment E-5: In addition the noise from fire trucks and fire drills, which are often conducted at mid night to emulate real-time conditions, will deprive us of sleep, with fire trucks running their engines right behind our homes. We have repeatedly asked not to place a fire lane or parking access behind our homes and to block access from Civic Center Drive to the 1601 site along the Triton Ct. property line. This is based on our actual experience during 13 months with problems associated with such access.

Response E-5: This is a housing project and like all other multi-family housing projects in Santa Clara, the Fire Department would not be conducting fire drills at this location. Any and all use of the fire lane by first responders would be for actual emergencies. It would be speculative to assume that emergency calls to this site would be substantially greater than for any other multi-family residential property in the City.

Comment E-6: Is our actual experience and observations over 13 months not more relevant than a hypothetical study based on potentially incomplete models? So far our request for blocking access from Civic Center Drive along Triton Ct.'s property line has been ignored. Noise from traffic and fire trucks are a major environmental nuisance. Suffering sleep deprivation due to noise for an extended period of time as we did during our 13 month ordeal has long term health and economic adverse consequences. Many of us still work from home and will not be able to do so because of noise levels.

dB Power ratio Amplitude ratio
100 10000000000 100000
90 1000000000 31623
80 100000000 10000
70 10000000 3162
60 1000000 1000
50 100000 316 .2
Civic Center Family Housing Project 14 Response to Comments Memo 40 10000 100
30 1000 31 .62
20 100 10
10 10 3 .162
6 3 .981 ≈ 4 1 .995 ≈ 2
3 1 .995 ≈ 2 1 .413 ≈ √2
1 1 .259 1 .122
0 1 1
−1 0 .794 0 .891
−3 0 .501 ≈ 1⁄2 0 .708 ≈ √ 1⁄2
−6 0 .251 ≈ 1⁄4 0 .501 ≈ 1⁄2
−10 0 .1 0 .3162
−20 0 .01 0 .1
−30 0 .001 0 .03162
−40 0 .0001 0 .01
−50 0 .00001 0 .003162
−60 0 .000001 0 .001
−70 0 .0000001 0 .0003162
Civic Center Family Housing Project 15 Response to Comments Memo −80 0 .00000001 0 .0001
−90 0 .000000001 0 .00003162
−100 0 .0000000001 0 .00001

Response E-6: Based on the Community Crime Map for the City of Santa Clara (https://communitycrimemap.com/) there have been no calls for service to the project site between January 1, 0221 and July 12, 2022. Fire Department data is not available on-line.

As noted in Response E-2, the intent and purpose of the Initial Study/MND is to provide the public and decisions-makers with an accounting of the physical environmental effects which may result from construction and implementation of the proposed project. The law does not allow for the CEQA analysis to address current operational issues of a property. The current commercial operation of the site is not equivalent to the proposed project and the current conditions on-site cannot be extrapolated into the analysis of future operations of a housing development.

As discussed on Pages 117-118 of the Initial Study/MND, operation of the proposed project would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels from either traffic or building operations and would have a less than significant impact. While construction noise would occur during allowable construction hours (Monday through Friday 7:00am to 6:00pm) for a period of 18 months, a noise control plan is required as a condition of approval.

Comment E-7: 5. As you are aware we have objected to the shadow study and statement in the FAQs posted on the City Project web site that " there is no additional shadow line impact on the neighboring properties when comparing the existing two-stories office building with a 10 ft setback ..."

The above statement is simply false: If you carefully examine Charities Housing's own shadow analysis it clearly shows there is no shadow from the existing building onto my home most of the year (Spring, Summer, Fall). I take issue with the only image showing some shadow during the Winter. I live in this home and currently have no building in my line of sight casting a shadow or blocking my view of the sky. How can a comparison of shadows cast onto my property with the existing building be correct?

I respectfully request a correction to the FAQ.

Response E-7: The shade and shadow study provided by the applicant shows the property at 1691 Triton Court as being cast in varying degrees of shadow from the proposed building in the morning hours throughout the year. The shade and shadow study shows the property at 1691 Triton Court to only be in shadow during the morning winter months under existing conditions. As a result of the applicant’s shade and shadow study, an increase in shading on the commenter’s property from the project is shown. No change to the diagram is necessary.

This comment does not speak to the environmental analysis.

Comment E-9: Conclusion: The primary reason these risks are magnified and don't lend themselves to adequate mitigation is the density of the project and its proximity to our homes. The mitigation models are not incorporating the effect of actual risks. How are the risks of a malfunction or accident Civic Center Family Housing Project 16 Response to Comments Memo modelled? How are the effects of long term ambient noise on our health, sleep, and sanity modelled? We therefore strongly object to the project which poses a long-term health hazard even after mitigations, and emphatically ask that Charities Housing relocate its project to a more suitable location with less adverse impact upon their neighbors, and do so before they cause more damage to their wall-to-wall neighbors than they already have.

Response E-9: Refer to Responses E-2 through E-7.

Comment Letter F: Jamie Lau – July 11, 2022

Comment F-1: Earlier on 6/24 I have submitted questions for the 1601 Civic Center Initial Study.

Please don’t take those as public comments. They are interim questions for the public outreach meeting and some of them have been answered, leading my final comments.

Please use below for my final public comments instead:

1. The 5-story high-density tall building does not fit in with the adjacent 2-story single family homes, this is a significant discount of aesthetics and property value to the adjacent family homes. This consideration should be included for the approval process.

Response F-1: While the houses immediately adjacent are two-story, there are three-story townhouses and a seven-story apartment complex in the immediate vicinity (Civic Center Drive and Warburton). So, a five-story building would be consistent with the mix of residential densities in this area. For additional reference, the proposed building would be setback 67 feet from the shared property line with the adjacent two-story residences and Civic Center Drive is 50 feet wide.

Comment F-2: City of Santa Clara has the opportunity to implement inclusive planning to mandate percentage of affordable housing units with any new regular market rate homes. There are also vacant lots elsewhere in the City more suitable for high-density affordable housing with less social and environmental impact to the surrounding. The site selection at 1601 Civic Center Drive is not suitable for the community in many ways.

Response F-2: This comment does not speak to the adequacy of the Initial Study/MND, and no text edits are required.

Comment F-3: 2. High-density of concentrated low income housing contradicts the City’s planning policies that affordable housing units should be dispersed throughout the City to avoid a concentration in any neighborhood. This Project will bring over 100 units in a small parcel of land - it is concentrated in one neighborhood. I understand the need of building more housing to solve homelessness, but such high-density affordable housing should be planned on a busy street away from quiet residential neighborhood for lesser social and environmental impact, and closer to a transit hub, such as a CalTrain or BART station for mobility. This project is neither.

Response F-3: The intent of the City’s policy is to avoid having all affordable units within one neighborhood or area of the City. Dispersal means throughout all neighborhoods.

Relative to the number of affordable units the City has and still needs to build, having 106 units in this area is not inconsistent with the policy. For reference, the City needs to build 4,525 affordable units by 2031. This project represents two percent of the total new units Civic Center Family Housing Project 17 Response to Comments Memo required Citywide. When added to the existing and approved affordable units, the project represents less than two percent of the total affordable units Citywide.

City policy also states “Encourage higher-density residential development in transit and mixed-use areas and in other locations throughout the City where appropriate. This site meets both criteria. The project site is within 1,000 feet of two bus stops which are served by Bus Route 22, the most active bus line in the County which runs from Palo Alto to East San José.

Also, within 2,000 feet (standard transit access walking distance) are Routes 32, 59, and Rapid 522 (see page 142-143 of Initial Study). The Santa Clara Transit Station is easily accessible from the project site using Bus Route 22 which runs 24 hours per day with buses running every 15 minutes. Bike lanes are also planned on El Camino Real. As such, the site is well suited for the proposed project as it is also within walking or biking distance to shopping and services on El Camino Real.

Comment F-4: 3. The plan amendment and rezoning of 1601 Civic Center is shortsighted. It is the only designated neighborhood commercial planned use outside of El Camino Real for the Civic Center community in City’s General Plan. The planned commercial land use can be local services that neighbors can safely walk to. We do not want to lose the only land that can serve as a commercial use to Civic Center neighbors in the years to come, considering all surrounding parcels will be planned for residential use in City's General Plan. Please use common sense and considerations for existing neighbors when determining the plan amendment approval.

Response F-4: This comment does not speak to the adequacy of the Initial Study/MND, and no text edits are required.

Comment F-5: 4. In the construction noise impact analysis, the study opted to use a guideline from FTA noise assessment, which is intended for transportation projects like trains stations/lines in populated areas. The assessment stated the guidelines are not meant as industry standards for all projects. The noise threshold of 90 dBA is especially high for a quiet residential neighborhood like Civic Center’s. Study should consider the delta from existing ambient noise and construction noise in determining impact level.

Response F-5: See Response D-6.

Comment F-6: 5. The project-generated permanent noise study did not consider scenario of cars with loud exhaust in the open parking lot.

Response F-6: See Response D-7.

Comment F-7: 6. The Project plans an open parking lot located adjacent to existing Triton Court single family homes. First, open at-grade parking lot design is not encouraged by City’s planning policies. Secondly, as the parking lot being situated discreetly away from a main street, it will attract crimes and dumping. As a consideration to the community’s safety and social impact, the Project should be designed with an underground parking lot and secured gate. The developer expressed no intent to build an underground parking structure due to cost.

Response F-7: See Responses D-2 and D-11.

Comment F-8: 7. Project’s planned 5-story building will have shadow impact to adjacent existing homes. It was evident in Developer’s initial project info. However, shadow impact was not discussed in the Initial Study. The shadow impact should be properly investigated.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 18 Response to Comments Memo Response F-8: See Response D-5.

Comment F-9: 8. The Transportation Study from Appendix F recommended only one entrance should be planned for the Project, but it currently plans two entrances - one on Civic Center Dr and another one on Lincoln Street. The recommendation is to reduce pedestrian and traffic safety incidents, as more entrances increases risks of collisions. The Project should follow the study’s recommendation to keep only one entrance, and that entrance should be on Lincoln Street.

Response F-9: This comment does not speak to the adequacy of the Initial Study/MND, and no text edits are required.

Comment F-10: 9. The Transportation Study from Appendix F did not mention there is no bus route from Project site going to Buscher Middle School and possible transit modes to the school. Only Santa Clara High School and Scott Lane Elementary School are discussed for the topic.

Response F-10: The transportation analysis acknowledges all three schools that would serve the project site and their distance from the site. In addition, the analysis outlines the available pedestrian and bicycle routes. Because the analysis provides a description of all transit access currently available to the three schools, it can be inferred that there is no transit access readily available to the middle school. It is acknowledged that most students are expected to be driven or will drive to school.

Comment F-11: 10. The Transportation Study from Appendix F recommended the Project to have white-lined zone and red-lined zones along the Project’s frontage on Civic Center Drive. This will remove street parking on Civic Center and burden the already tighten parking situation.

Response F-11: See Response D-4.

Comment F-12: 11. No where on the development plan indicating the Project’s parking will be assigned or not. The plan should list that as a design commitment on the design plan.

Response F-12: This comment does not speak to the adequacy of the Initial Study/MND, and no text edits are required.

Comment F-13: 12. The Project Listing summary page should accurately reflect the total number of units as 108 instead of 106 without the two management units.

Response F-13: The total number of units proposed is 108, with 106 rental units and two manager units. For the purposes of CEQA and the environmental analysis, the composition of the 108 units is not relevant as each residential unit is treated the same with regard to traffic generation, utility usage, public services usage (including student generation), etc.

Comment F-14: 13. School enrollment impact study uses data from 2017, that’s about 5 years old.

The Santa Clara High School is already reaching capacity per the 2017 data. To my knowledge, Buscher Middle School is also reaching capacity as it does not accept second round of open enrollment; the study shows no impact to Busher Middle School, which is likely false. The mitigation for school enrollment impact is for the developer to pay a fee to the district. The study should involve the school district to provide current enrollment status and if the district is able to mitigate the problem with fees paid. The report does not show the school district was involved in the study.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 19 Response to Comments Memo Response F-14: See Response D-10.

Comment F-15: 14. Appendix D indicates Charities Housing did not return the User Questionnaire per EPA, therefore, environmental liens and activity and use limitations are not evaluated. Should these be evaluated for the study?

Response F-15: The lack of a user questionnaire does not invalidate the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment or the analysis in the Initial Study/MND. While these are helpful to gather information on a specific site, the analysis is reliant on a site reconnaissance completed by the hazardous materials consultant and a review of all available regulatory databases.

Comment F-16: 15. Sanitary Sewer Study from Appendix G indicates a sewer pipe will reach 82.2% capacity with the development. Did City of Santa Clara sanitary department review this finding and consider that’s an acceptable number?

Response F-16: The Sanitary Sewer Study is commissioned by the City and reviewed for accuracy prior to being provided to the environmental consultant. Had the study identified any capacity issues resulting from the project, the project would be conditioned by the City to make the necessary improvements. The City did not identify any capacity issue which would require an upgrade to the current infrastructure by the project applicant. As discussed on Page 156 of the Initial Study/MND, City staff concluded that there is sufficient capacity to serve the proposed development.

Comment Letter G: Jean Song – July 12, 2022

Comment G-1: This is Jean, a resident of the Civic Center Drive neighborhood. I read the environmental report and read the reviews of existing Charities Housing (CH) in the bay area. The more I read and learned, the more I'm concerned about this project.

I'm afraid CH barely cares about the living conditions of their residents. Hardly does CH show respect to the neighbors. I'll write in the aspects of transportation, safety and security, amenities and construction impacts.

Response G-1: Responses to specific comments are provided below.

Comment G-2: 1) Transportation
They plan to build 108 units with only 82 parking spaces at most. Note that the average car ownership in Santa Clara county is 2 cars per household. That means, 134 cars of the residents of CH are expected to do street parking. But the current parking in the neighborhood is already overcrowded. You can find _zero_ parking spot after 4pm in Civic Center Dr. I can't imagine what the residents can do after they come back from work but can't find a parking spot.

Response G-2: See Response D-4. A project need only meet the applicable parking requirements. The City of Santa Clara parking ratios are not derived from average car ownership. Parking requirements are based on land use type and take into account mitigating factors such as mixed use, affordable housing, proximity to transit, and the Density Bonus law (when applicable) as noted by the commenter. Per Assembly Bill 2345, 100 percent affordable housing projects within one-half miles of a major transit stop are only required to provide 0.5 spaces per unit. By state law (Government Code Section 65915), the project is required to provide 54 parking spaces, but is proposing 82.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 20 Response to Comments Memo Comment G-3: According to the outreach meeting organized by CH, their focus of this project is the people who make 30-50% AMI. These are working people who need to commute every day. With the poor transportation nearby (no caltrain, no VTA light rail, only 2 bus routes to Palo Alto and Baypointe station), the residents have to commute mostly by cars.

I also learned that 25% of the residents would be those who have risks to become homeless. They either recently lost their jobs, or have some medical conditions. These people either have to look for jobs actively, or need to commute to hospitals frequently. In either case, they need cars to commute.

82 parking spaces are absolutely far from enough. However, CH refused to provide enough parking space to their residents. They rejected the suggestion to build underground parking. I don't understand why they can't accommodate, but they don't seem to care about their residents, let alone the burden that will be posed upon the neighborhood.

Response G-3: See Responses D-4 and D-9.

Comment G-4: 2) Safety and security
According to the reviews of other CH locations in the Bay Area, there're many car break-ins. This poses a big risk to the neighborhood. Is CH prone to attract crimes? Does CH do any security or background check to the future residents? As someone living within 2-min walk from the proposed location, I'm really worried about the change that would be brought by the project. Will it be safe to walk in the neighborhood any more? Will there be break-ins to cars and even houses? How could we protect our fences?

Response G-4: This comment does not speak to the environmental analysis. The intent and purpose of the Initial Study/MND is to provide the public and decisions-makers with an accounting of the physical environmental effects which may result from construction and implementation of the proposed project. The law does not allow for the CEQA analysis to address speculative future scenarios.

Comment G-5: The proposed project creates an entry driveway along the wall with Triton Ct, and their proposed parking lot just faces Triton Ct. How much impact would be on the existing residents?

Response G-5: It is unclear what potential impacts the commenter is referring to. With regard to parking lots, the primary issues under CEQA are noise and lighting. Both were addressed in the Initial Study/MND. Light and glare is discussed in Section 4.1.2 (Page 19) of the Initial Study/MND. Operational noise is discussed on Pages 117-118 of the Initial Study/MND.

Comment G-6: 3) Amenities
Lots of CH residents complain that the places are full of bed bugs and roaches. How CH manages the places is a big question. CH isn't willing to treat these bugs before the move-in of new residents. Again, this shows how little CH cares about their residents.

Response G-6: The intent and purpose of the Initial Study/MND is to provide the public and decisions-makers with an accounting of the physical environmental effects which may result from construction and implementation of the proposed project. The law does not allow for the CEQA analysis to address current operational issues of properties that are not part of the proposed project.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 21 Response to Comments Memo Comment G-7: One reason that CH selected this location is the Warburton medical plaza. However, that plaza only offers urgent care and treatment for sport injuries. If the residents have any other medical conditions, such as diabetes, COVID, or cancer, they have to drive to big hospitals to get treatment. CH's claim of walking distance to hospitals doesn't really hold.

Response G-7: This comment does not speak to the environmental analysis.

Comment G-8: Additionally, the schools in the neighborhood are almost full. With the high density that the proposed CH will bring, how the schools can accommodate more kids is another big question. If overflow happens, parents have to drive even farther to send and pick up their kids. As discussed above about the transportation, this would be very hard for both the CH residents and the neighbors.

Response G-8: See Response D-10.

Comment G-9: 4) Construction impacts
According to the environmental report, the noise from the construction will be up to 90 dB. This is absolutely inappropriate to a neighborhood with so many residents. 90 dB is mostly used to build airports and railways, absolutely not for houses. The construction will also bring lots of dusts, such as PM2.5 and PM10. The proposed location is just one wall against Triton Ct. This will bring great inconvenience and risks to the existing residents. I'm really pathetic about the situation.

Response G-9: A noise study was commissioned by the environmental consultant under direction by City staff. The Initial Study/MND concluded that with implementation of the identified measures, the temporary construction noise impacts would be less than significant (see Pages 116-117 of the Initial Study/MND).

An air quality analysis was also commissioned by the environmental consultant under direction by City staff which addressed dust and other air pollutants that would be generated during construction. The Initial Study/MND concluded that with implementation of the conditions of approval and mitigation measures identified, the temporary construction air quality impacts would be less than significant (Pages 31-33 and 34-37).

Comment G-10: In summary, this project will bring extremely negative impacts on both the future CH residents and the existing neighbors. I know the housing crisis in the bay area is urgent. But please, please do it good instead of evil. Please treat all the people, both low-income and high- income, with respect. Please protect the neighborhood with improved safety and security. Please provide the necessary amenities and healthy living environment to the residents.

There're other locations in Santa Clara that might tolerate 90 dB construction noise, such as those near commercial zones. These locations could be big enough to build more parking spaces. They can also have better transportation, be closer to hospitals, and have less crowded school enrollment than the proposed location. I hope you could consider my petition and cancel this project.

Response G-10: This comment does not speak to the environmental analysis. Please see previous responses.

Comment Letter H: David Bayto – July 12, 2022

Comment H-1: Below are my comments, opinions and recommendations related to Charities Housing (CH) environmental review documents (Mitigated Negative Declaration "MND").

Civic Center Family Housing Project 22 Response to Comments Memo I am opposed to the rezoning of the 1601 Civic Drive property from commercial to high density residential housing zoning as currently proposed. If the zoning change is approved, then the following recommendations should be adapted prior to approved zoning changes.

Comments, Opinions, and Recommendations related to Charities Housing (CH) environmental review documents.

Summary:

• Issue: At what point are the legal rights of the project developers to overshadow the rights and quality of life of the current residences of the Civic Center neighborhood? • Issue: The financial impact of the proposed development has not been provided for public review and discussion.
o What is the financial burden for the citizen of Santa Clara, City of Santa Clara, County of Santa Clara, and the State of California?
o What is the financial interest of the project stakeholders such as the Limited Partnership(s) involved in the proposed development?

Response H-1: Section 15131 of the CEQA Guidelines states that “economic or social effects of a project shall not be treated as significant effects on the environment”. The Initial Study/MND can only address impacts as they relate to the checklist questions which are intended to address the physical environmental effects of the project. As a result, the Initial Study/MND did not address any economic or social effects of the project.

Comment H-2: Issue: The traffic study of Charities Housing (CH) environmental review documents does not address the current neighborhood parking issue. There is a significant lack of street parking to support the current neighborhood requirements.

• Issue: The proposed 1601 Civic Center Drive project would require an additional 134 street parking spaces to be available to service the 1601 Civic Center Drive residence causing an adverse effect on the current parking issues on Civic Center Drive.

Response H-2: See Response D-4.

Comment H-3: Issue: CH’s project design does not include the Transportation Study’s recommendations for 1.) Site Access, 2.) Passenger Loading and 3.) Sight Distance at Project Driveways.

Response H-4: See Responses D-1, D-3, and D-4.

Comment H-5: Issue: The project does not have underground parking as encouraged by City's General Plan guidelines.

Response H-5: See Response D-11.

Comment H-6: Issue: The proposed five (5) story structure architectural does not conform to the El Camino Corridor heigh limits and the adjacent 2-story homes, or surrounding homes.

Response H-6: See Response F-1. The proposed General Plan designation is intended for mid-rise buildings. Mid-rise buildings are typically defined as five to 12 stories.

Comment H-7: Recommendation: Provide a financial impact study for transparency and public review prior to change in rezoning.

Civic Center Family Housing Project 23 Response to Comments Memo Response H-7: See Response H-1.

Comment H-8: Recommendation: Provide no less than two parking space per unit or 216 parking spaces. (108 units x 2 cars)
o Based on the potential 480 occupancy rate and
o Based on 2 car per household is average number for California would require 216 spaces (108 units x 2 cars). Thus, 82 space per unit would appear to be unreasonable. o Based on the need to address the current lack of parking during peak hours and weekends. • Recommendation: All parking should be under the proposed structure either in a garage and/or underground parking lot. Underground parking is both feasible and particle. o 1364 El Camino development has both under building structure parking and an underground parking lot Thus, it can be done.
o 1690 Civic Center Drive has an underground parking lot. Thus, it can be done. o The marginal cost for an underground parking lot structure would be amortized over a 55- year period based. Thus, minimizing the issues that it is not cost effective to build underground parking.

Response H-8: The intent and purpose of the Initial Study/MND is to provide the public and decisions-makers with an accounting of the physical environmental effects which may result from construction and implementation of the proposed project. The law does not allow for the CEQA analysis to address current operational issues of a property or surrounding area.

See Response D-4.

It should be noted that the excavation required for underground parking would result in a longer construction timeframe and, due to the extended use of heavy equipment, increase construction noise and air pollutant emissions compared to the current proposal.

Comment H-9: Recommendation: Eliminate all surface parking on the west side of the proposed project that impact the quality of life for the residence on Triton Court.

Response H-9: It is not clear what quality of life issues the commenter believes would occur as a result of the surface parking lot. See Responses D-2, D-7, and G-5 for responses to specific issues raised by other commenters regarding the proposed surface lot.

Comment H-10: Recommendation: The project should provide only one driveway to access the site on Lincoln Street per Transportation Study’s recommendations • Recommendation: The project should include a loading zone per the per Transportation Study’s recommendations

Response H-10: See Response D-4.

Comment H-11: Analysis and Comments:

Parking
This development, as proposed will provide up to 82 parking spaces which may conform to the Density Bonus law but conflict with the car California ownership data indicating that the average car ownership in California is 2 cars per household. The number of parking space should be 216 (108 units x 2 cars per household. Thus, the proposed 82 parking spaces will contribute to have an adverse effect on the existing the current parking issues on Civic Center Drive. Therefore, based on the California average rate of 2 car per household and CH’s proposed 82 parking would require an additional 134 street parking spaces to be available to service 1601 Civic Center Drive residence

Civic Center Family Housing Project 24 Response to Comments Memo Response H-11: See Response G-2.

Comment H-12: Occupancy:

How Many is too Many? Limits on Unit Occupancy Explained. The total number occupants for the proposed project could be as high as 480 based on Charities Housing’s (CH) occupancy data, and the “California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) policy for regulating occupancy, which is known as the “two plus one” formula.

Based on
Plus 1 for each living room (108 -28) =
80 80

Total 480

Is it reasonable to assume that occupancy rate in combination with the 2 car average per household would requirement more parking than the 82 spaces assuming 2 car per household is average number for California. Thus, there should be 216 parking spaces (108 units x 2) instead of the 82 proposed parking spaces

Response H-12: See Response G-2.

Comment H-13: Transportation Study’s Recommendation

Site Access - Recommendation: The project should provide only one driveway to access the site.

The project would increase the number of driveways accessing the site from one to two driveways.

Because the project would generate a low number of project trips, it is not necessary to provide two access points to the site for access and circulation. Increasing the access points would increase the conflicts between pedestrians/bicycles and vehicles. Therefore, the project should maintain only one driveway to access the site.

Passenger Loading - Recommendation: The project should provide a passenger loading zone on Civic Center Drive near the entrance to the building lobby or within the surface parking lot or parking garage.

Sight Distance at Project Driveways - Recommendation: The curb segments next to the project driveways on Civic Center Drive should be painted red for 15 feet to prohibit parking and ensure adequate sight distance for outbound traffic.

Response H-13: See Responses D-1, D-3, and D-4.

Unit Size # Units Max
Studio (1-2
occupants) 28 56
1BR (1-3 occupants) 24 72
2BR (2-4 occupants) 26 104
3BR (3-6 occupants) 26 156
3BR (3-6 occupants) 2 12
400
Civic Center Family Housing Project 25 Response to Comments Memo

CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT

TEXT EDITS

This section contains revisions to the text of the Civic Center Family Housing project dated June 2022. Revised or new language is underlined. All deletions are shown with a line through the text.

None of the text revisions shown below change the conclusion of the IS/MND and no recirculation is required.