Agenda packet — City Council and Authorities Concurrent, December 13, 2022

City of Santa Clara
Meeting Agenda
Council and Authorities Concurrent Meeting
Hybrid Meeting
City Hall Council Chambers/Virtual
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
7:00 PMTuesday, December 13, 2022
The City of Santa Clara will be conducting City Council meetings in a hybrid manner (in-person and continues to have methods for the public to participate remotely). Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e) and City of Santa Clara Resolution No. 22-9160 Councilmembers may teleconference from remote locations and the City continues to provide methods for the public to participate remotely:
• Via Zoom:
o https://santaclaraca.zoom.us/j/99706759306
Meeting ID: 997-0675-9306 or
o Phone: 1(669) 900-6833
• Via the City’s eComment
As always, the public may view the meetings on SantaClaraCA.gov, Santa Clara City Television (Comcast cable channel 15 or AT&T U-verse channel 99), or the livestream on the City’s YouTube channel or Facebook page.
7:00 PM COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
Call to Order
Call to Order in the Council Chambers (Open to the Public) Pledge of Allegiance and Statement of Values
Roll Call

CONTINUANCES/EXCEPTIONS/RECONSIDERATIONS

CONSENT CALENDAR
[Items listed on the CONSENT CALENDAR are considered routine and will be adopted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of the items on the CONSENT CALENDAR unless discussion is requested by a member of the Council, staff, or public. If so requested, that item will be removed from the CONSENT CALENDAR and considered under CONSENT ITEMS PULLED FOR DISCUSSION.]

Page 1 of 4 ends

Council and Authorities Concurrent Meeting
Meeting Agenda December 13, 2022

1.A Board, Commissions and Committee Minutes22-33
Note and file the Minutes of:

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee - August
22, 2022
Historical and Landmarks Commission - November 3,
2022
Recommendation:

1.B Action on a Resolution Extending AB 361 Implementation to Allow
City Legislative Bodies to Hold Public Meetings Solely by Teleconference or Otherwise Electronically During the
Governor’s Proclaimed COVID State of Emergency
22-1525
Adopt a Resolution finding the existence of the need
to extend AB 361 implementation to allow the City’s
legislative bodies to hold public meetings solely by
teleconference or otherwise electronically pursuant to
AB 361.

Recommendation:

PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
[This item is reserved for persons to address the Council or authorities on any matter not on the agenda that is within the
subject matter jurisdiction of the City or Authorities. The law does not permit action on, or extended discussion of, any item not on the agenda except under special circumstances. The governing body, or staff, may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed, and appropriate body may request staff to report back at a subsequent meeting. Although not required, please submit to the City Clerk your name and subject matter on the speaker card available in the Council Chambers.]

CONSENT ITEMS PULLED FOR DISCUSSION

PUBLIC HEARING/GENERAL BUSINESS

2. Adopt a Resolution Declaring the Results of the Canvass of Returns of the Consolidated
General Municipal
Election held on November 8, 2022 with the
Statewide Gubernatorial Election
22-897
Adopt a resolution reciting the facts of the
Consolidated Municipal Election held on November 8,
2022 with the Statewide Gubernatorial Election and
declare the following candidates elected: for
Councilmember in Council District 2 Raj Chahal, for
Councilmember in Council District 3 Karen Hardy, and
for Mayor Lisa M. Gillmor, each for a four-year term
ending 2026.

Recommendation:

Page 2 of 4 ends

Council and Authorities Concurrent Meeting
Meeting Agenda December 13, 2022
a. Administration of Oath to Re-Elected Councilmember for District 2 Raj Chahal b. Administration of Oath to Re-Elected Councilmember for District 3 Karen Hardy c. Administration of Oath to Re-Elected Mayor Lisa M. Gillmor

4. Remarks by Elected Officials
a. Re-Elected Councilmember for District 2 Raj Chahal
b. Re-Elected Councilmember for District 3 Karen Hardy
c. Re-Elected Mayor Lisa M. Gillmor

REPORTS OF MEMBERS AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES

CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT

ADJOURNMENT
The next regular scheduled meeting is on Tuesday, January 10, 2023 in the City Hall Council Chambers.

Page 3 of 4 ends

3. Ceremonial Oaths Administered to Elected Officials as Follows:

Council and Authorities Concurrent Meeting Meeting Agenda December 13, 2022

Page 4 of 4 ends

MEETING DISCLOSURES
The time limit within which to commence any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, unless a shorter limitation period is specified by any other provision. Under Section 1094.6, any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which such decision becomes final. Any lawsuit or legal challenge, which is not filed within that 90-day period, will be barred. If a person wishes to challenge the nature of the above section in court, they may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the meeting described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clara, at or prior to the meeting. In addition, judicial challenge may be limited or barred where the interested party has not sought and exhausted all available administrative remedies.

AB23 ANNOUNCEMENT: Members of the Santa Clara Stadium Authority, Sports and Open Space Authority and Housing Authority are entitled to receive $30 for each attended meeting.

Note: The City Council and its associated Authorities meet as separate agencies but in a concurrent manner. Actions taken should be considered actions of only the identified policy body.

LEGEND: City Council (CC); Stadium Authority (SA); Sports and Open Space Authority (SOSA); Housing Authority (HA); Successor Agency to the City of Santa Clara Redevelopment Agency (SARDA); Bayshore North Project Enhancement Authority (BNPEA); Public Facilities Financing Corporation (PFFC) Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City’s official-notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting. A hard copy of any agenda report may be requested by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 615-2220, email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or at the public information desk at any City of Santa Clara public library.

If a member of the public submits a speaker card for any agenda items, their name will appear in the Minutes. If no speaker card is submitted, the Minutes will reflect "Public Speaker." In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), the City of Santa Clara will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in its services, programs, or activities, and will ensure that all existing facilities will be made accessible to the maximum extent feasible. The City of Santa Clara will generally, upon request, provide appropriate aids and services leading to effective communication for qualified persons with disabilities including those with speech, hearing, or vision impairments so they can participate equally in the City’s programs, services, and activities. The City of Santa Clara will make all reasonable modifications to policies and programs to ensure that people with disabilities have an equal opportunity to enjoy all of its programs, services, and activities.

Agendas and other written materials distributed during a public meeting that are public record will be made available by the City in an appropriate alternative format. Contact the City Clerk’s Office at 1 408-615-2220 with your request for an alternative format copy of the agenda or other written materials.

Individuals who require an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication, or any other disability-related modification of policies or procedures, or other accommodation, in order to participate in a program, service, or activity of the City of Santa Clara, should contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at 408-615-3000 as soon as possible but no later than 48 hours before the scheduled event.

City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-33 Agenda Date: 12/13/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Board, Commissions and Committee Minutes

COUNCIL PILLAR
Enhance Community Engagement and Transparency

RECOMMENDATION
Note and file the Minutes of:

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee - August 22, 2022 Historical and Landmarks Commission - November 3, 2022
City of Santa Clara Printed on 12/9/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
City of Santa Clara
Meeting Minutes
Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee

REVISED
4:00 PM Virtual Meeting
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95051
08/22/2022
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54953(e) and City of Santa Clara Resolution 22-9124, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee meeting will be held by teleconference only. No physical location will be available for this meeting; however, the City of Santa Clara continues to have methods for the public to participate remotely:
• Via Zoom:
https://santaclaraca.zoom.us/j/95582744643
Meeting ID: 955 8274 4643 or

Phone: 1 (669) 900-6833

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chair Hardy called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.

Member Cha joined the meeting at 4:07 p.m.

Chair Karen Hardy, Member Lloyd Cha, Member Betsy Megas, Member Diane Harrison, Member Cecily Cox, Member Bruce
Donoghue, Member Jane Casamajor, and Member Sukrit Ganesh Present 8 -
Vice Chair Sudhanshu JainExcused 1 -

Page 1 ends

08/22/2022Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory
Committee
Meeting Minutes

2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
Video: [00:01:40]
Ken Kratz asked that City Council raise taxes to generate revenue for funding for bicycle projects and other City projects and programs.

Thomas Granvold commented on an increase in electrical bicycles on the street and there should be a discussion about usage of bicycle facilities.

He also recommend using the MySantaClara App to report bicycle lane blockage. He also mentioned that the real estate website Zillow rates properties by bikeability, walkability, and access to transit.

Edmund Drozek called attention to the intersection of the San Tomas Aquino Creek Trail crossing and Monroe Street and wants the design changed to have in-roadway lights.

Staff responded to report bicycle lane blockage using non-emergency Police phone number.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. 22-957 Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of June 27, 2022 (Chair Hardy)
Recommendation: Approve the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of June 27, 2022.

Member Cha arrived at 4:07 pm.

Video [00:13:45]
A motion was made by Member Megas, seconded by Member
Ganesh, that the June 27, 2022 meeting minutes be Approved as amended.

Aye: Chair Hardy, Member Cha, Member Megas, Member Harrison, Member Cox, Member Donoghue, Member Casamajor, and Member Ganesh
8 -
Excused: Vice Chair Jain1 -

4. REPORTS FOR COMMITTEE INFORMATION

Page 2 ends

08/22/2022Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory
Committee
Meeting Minutes
A. 22-958 Public Works Verbal Update (Yee)
Video [00:19:09]
Mr. Yee provided an update to the Committee, including the Lafayette Class IV Bikeway Project, the Lafayette removal of crosswalks, e-bikes and e-scooters, Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan Council date on August 30, and Lick Mill station lighting upgrade project and mini-roundabouts in October 2022 or January 2023.

Committee comments and questions regarding e-scooters and e-bikes and where to report violations.

Mr. Yee and Mr. Garcia addressed Committee questions.

Public Speaker(s): Ken Kratz, Thomas Granvold, Igor
B. 22-959
Police Verbal Update (Wilson)
Video: [00:39:57]
Officer Wilson provided an update on bicycle and pedestrian collisions.

Committee comments and questions followed.

Officer Wilson addressed Committee questions.

Public Speaker(s): Thomas Granvold, Igor, Tom Freitas
C. 22-956 VTA BPAC Verbal Update (Megas)
Video: [00:54:14]
Member Megas provided an update related to the VTA BPAC.

Public Speaker(s): Thomas Granvold

Page 3 ends

08/22/2022Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory
Committee
Meeting Minutes
D. 22-947 Grant Activity Verbal Update (Shariat)
Video [01:01:10]
Ms. Shariat provided an update on recent grant related activity and included a discussion on the OTS Grant which a portion will be used for bike helmets or other safety items for the Safe Routes to School program.

Committee comments and questions followed.

Ms. Shariat and Mr. Yee addressed Committee questions.

E. 22-960 Zoning Code Update (Davidson)
Video [01:19:58]
Mr. Davidson presented information regarding an update to the Zoning Code and in relation to bicycle parking requirements.

Committee comments and questions followed.

Mr. Davidson addressed Committee questions.

Public Speaker(s): Thomas Granvold, Ken Kratz
F. 22-961 15 MPH School Zone Speed Limit (Yee)
Video [01:46:19]
Mr. Yee provided information regarding establishing 15 mph speed limits in school zones.

Committee comments and questions followed.

Mr. Yee addressed Committee questions.

Public Speaker(s): Thomas Granvold, Ken Kratz

Page 4 ends

08/22/2022Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory
Committee
Meeting Minutes
G. 22-962 Crosswalk and Ramp Alignment (Garcia)
Video [02:17:57]
Mr. Garcia provided information on standards and processes followed to align crosswalks and curb ramps.

Committee comments and questions followed including examples from Europe and the East Coast about elevated crosswalks.

Mr. Garcia addressed Committee questions.

Public Speaker(s): Ken Kratz, Thomas Granvold
H. 22-963
Slow Streets (Shariat)
Video [03:14:45]
Ms. Shariat provided information on Slow Streets, a community driven program to close roadway to thru traffic.

Committee comments and questions followed.

Ms. Shariat addressed Committee questions.

Public Speaker(s): Thomas Granvold, Ken Kratz, Gabriela Landaveri I. 22-964 Bicycle Parking and Security (Garcia)
Video [03:36:05]
Mr. Garcia provided information on types bicycle parking, future bicycle parking locations, and bicycle theft statistics.

Committee comments and questions followed.

Mr. Garcia and Ms. Shariat addressed Committee questions.

Public Speaker(s): Gabriela Landaveri, Thomas Granvold, Ken Kratz

5. REPORTS FOR COMMITTEE ACTION

Page 5 ends

08/22/2022Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory
Committee
Meeting Minutes
A. 22-948 2023 Annual Work Plan (Yee)
Recommendation: The BPAC to approve staff recommendation.

Video [04:15:03]
Mr. Yee presented about the process to develop the 2023 Annual Work Plan.

Committee comments and questions followed.

Mr. Yee addressed Committee questions.

Public Speaker(s): Thomas Granvold, Gabriela Landaveri, Ken Kratz A motion was made by Member Harrison, seconded by Member Megas, to Approve staff’s process recommendation.

Approved Staff Recommendation

Aye: Chair Hardy, Member Cha, Member Megas, Member Harrison, Member Donoghue, Member Casamajor, and Member Ganesh
7 -
Excused: Vice Chair Jain1 -

Absent: Member Cox1 -

6. REPORTS FOR SPECIAL COMMITTEES
A. 22-943 Subcommittee on Bicycle Story Maps (Cha and Megas) Video [05:02:03]
Subcommittee had no updates to provide.

B. 22-944 Subcommittee on Police Collision History (Cha, Donoghue, and Cox) Video [05:03:41]
Member Donoghue stated he will follow up with Police to obtain more information for the Subcommittee. Member Cha addressed comments made by Officer Wilson at the August 22, 2022 BPAC meeting about a recent incident involving a bicycle on Benton Street in front of Santa Clara High School. Member Harrison stated that the Police rep should stay longer at the meetings to understand the Committee's concerns.

Page 6 ends

08/22/2022Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory
Committee
Meeting Minutes
C. 22-945 Subcommittee on Bike to Shop Day (Harrison, Megas, and Kratz) Video [05:14:40]
Subcommittee had no updates to provide.

D. 22-946 Subcommittee on Roundabouts (Harrison, Megas, Cha, Ganesh, and Kratz)
Video [05:15:04]
Subcommittee had no updates to provide.

7. AGENDA ITEMS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS

8. ANNOUNCEMENTS
Announcements:
1) Pruneridge was to be on the council agenda August 30th. 2) City calendar photos were to be taken the week of August 29th. 3) The senior center was to hold an ice cream social on August 27th.

9. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 PM.

A motion was made by Member Harrison, seconded by Member Ganesh, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: Chair Hardy, Member Cha, Member Megas, Member Harrison, Member Cox, Member Donoghue, Member Casamajor, and Member Ganesh
8 -
Excused: Vice Chair Jain1 -
The next regular scheduled meeting will be on Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:00 PM.

Page 7 ends

08/22/2022Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory
Committee
Meeting Minutes
The time limit within which to commence any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, unless a shorter limitation period is specified by any other provision. Under Section 1094.6, any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which such decision becomes final. Any lawsuit or legal challenge, which is not filed within that 90-day period, will be barred. If a person wishes to challenge the nature of the above section in court, they may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the meeting described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clara, at or prior to the meeting. In addition, judicial challenge may be limited or barred where the interested party has not sought and exhausted all available administrative remedies.

If a member of the public submits a speaker card for any agenda items, their name will appear in the Minutes. If no speaker card is submitted, the Minutes will reflect "Public Speaker."
In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), the City of Santa Clara will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in its services, programs, or activities, and will ensure that all existing facilities will be made accessible to the maximum extent feasible. The City of Santa Clara will generally, upon request, provide appropriate aids and services leading to effective communication for qualified persons with disabilities including those with speech, hearing, or vision impairments so they can participate equally in the City’s programs, services, and activities. The City of Santa Clara will make all reasonable modifications to policies and programs to ensure that people with disabilities have an equal opportunity to enjoy all of its programs, services, and activities.

Agendas and other written materials distributed during a public meeting that are public record will be made available by the City in an appropriate alternative format.

Contact the City Clerk’s Office at 1 408-615-2220 with your request for an alternative format copy of the agenda or other written materials.

Page 8 ends

City of Santa Clara
Meeting Minutes
Historical & Landmarks Commission
Draft
6:00 PM Virtual Meeting11/03/2022
Pursuant to California Government Code section 54953(e) and City of Santa Clara Resolution 22-9145, the Historical and Landmarks Commission meeting will be held by teleconference only.

No physical location will be available for this meeting; however, the City of Santa Clara continues to provide methods for the public to participate remotely:
• Via Zoom:
o https://santaclaraca.zoom.us/j/97233262035 or
o Phone: 1 (669) 900-6833
Webinar ID: 972 3326 2035
Public Comments prior to meeting may be submitted via email to [email protected] no later than noon on the day of the meeting. Clearly indicate the project address, meeting body, and meeting date in the email.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ZOOM WEBINAR:

Please follow the guidelines below when participating in a Zoom Webinar:
- The meeting will be recorded so you must choose 'continue' to accept and stay in the meeting. - If there is an option to change the phone number to your name when you enter the meeting, please do so as your name will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak.
- Mute all other audio before speaking. Using multiple devices can cause an audio feedback. - Use the raise your hand feature in Zoom when you would like to speak on an item and lower when finished speaking. Press *9 to raise your hand if you are calling in by phone only. - Identify yourself by name before speaking on an item. - Unmute when called on to speak and mute when done speaking. If there is background noise coming from a participant, they will be muted by the host. Press *6 if you are participating by phone to unmute.
- If you no longer wish to stay in the meeting once your item has been heard, you may leave the meeting.

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chair Leung called the meeting to order at 6:03 PM.

Commissioner Michael Celso , Commissioner Amy Kirby, Chair Patricia Leung, Commissioner Kathleen Romano, Commissioner Ed Stocks, Commissioner Megan Swartzwelder , and Vice Chair Ana Vargas-Smith
Present 7 -

Page 1 ends

11/03/2022Historical & Landmarks Commission Meeting Minutes

CONSENT CALENDAR
Chair Leung requested to move item 1.B to the public hearing.

1.A 22-1298 Historical and Landmarks Commission Minutes of October 6, 2022 Commissioner Romano abstained due to her absence at the October meeting.

A motion was made by Vice Chair Vargas-Smith, seconded by Commissioner Stocks, to approve the remainder of the consent calendar.

Aye: Commissioner Celso, Commissioner Kirby, Chair Leung, Commissioner Stocks, Commissioner Swartzwelder, and Vice Chair Vargas-Smith
6 -
Abstained: Commissioner Romano1 -

1.B 22-1306
Consideration of a proposed new attached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) at 1860 Market Street that is located within 200 feet of a Historic Resource.

This item was moved from consent and heard first under General Business.

A motion was made by Commissioner Romano, seconded by
Commissioner Stocks, to continue this item to the February HLC meeting to allow time for the architect to review letters provided by the HLC Advisors and to consider modifying the proposed shed dormer to a hip dormer.

Aye: Commissioner Celso, Commissioner Kirby, Chair Leung, Commissioner Romano, Commissioner Stocks, Commissioner
Swartzwelder, and Vice Chair Vargas-Smith
7 -

PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
Chair Leung updated the Commission on the City Council's discussion regarding the lease renewal for City-owned Morse Mansion.

Rob Mayer expressed concern with the Minor Significant Property Alteration Permit process and suggested that more checks and balance is needed and that the HLC should be a part of the review process.

GENERAL BUSINESS

Page 2 ends

11/03/2022Historical & Landmarks Commission Meeting Minutes

2. 22-1267 Consideration of Historic Resource Inventory Property Designation and a Historical Preservation Agreement (Mills Act Contract) for 324 Madison Street
A motion was made by Commissioner Stocks, seconded by
Commissioner Romano, to approve staff recommendation with direction to switch Years 4 and 5 and the addition of a bronze plaque "c. 1936."

Aye: Commissioner Celso, Commissioner Kirby, Chair Leung, Commissioner Romano, Commissioner Stocks, Commissioner
Swartzwelder, and Vice Chair Vargas-Smith
7 -

3. 22-1323
STUDY SESSION: Historic Preservation Ordinance
Staff Liaison Rebecca Bustos provided a presentation about the Historic Preservation Ordinance and provided a Case Study of 712 Jefferson Street.

The Commission and two members of the public, Rob Mayer and Jonathon Evans, provided comment.

STAFF REPORT
Staff Liaison Rebecca Bustos updated the Commission that Chair Leung would be presenting at the November 15 City Council meeting on the Commission's activities. In addition, staff notified the Commission that the City received a grant through the SHPO.

1. Berryessa Adobe Maintenance
Staff had no update on maintenance activities.

COMMISSIONERS REPORT

1. Subcommittee Reporting - 20 minutes
Commissioners reported on subcommittee activities. The Marketing Subcommittee stated that they had not met.

2. Board and Committee Assignments - 15 minutes
Board/Committee Lead/Alternate

Page 3 ends

11/03/2022Historical & Landmarks Commission Meeting Minutes Santa Clara Arts and Historic Consortium Leung / Romano Historic Preservation Society of Santa Clara Vargas-Smith / Leung Old Quad Residents Association Leung / Romano Development Review Hearing Romano / Vargas-Smith BART/ High Speed Rail/ VTA BRT Committee Vargas-Smith / Swartzwelder Zoning Ordinance Update Romano / Swartzwelder El Camino Real Specific Plan Community Advisory Committee Leung

ADJOURNMENT
A motion was made by Commissioner Vargas-Smith, and seconded by Commissioner Stocks, to adjourn the meeting at 9:39 p.m..

The next regular scheduled meeting is Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 6 p.m.

MEETING DISCLOSURES

Page 4 ends

11/03/2022Historical & Landmarks Commission Meeting Minutes The time limit within which to commence any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, unless a shorter limitation period is specified by any other provision. Under Section 1094.6, any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which such decision becomes final. Any lawsuit or legal challenge, which is not filed within that 90-day period, will be barred. If a person wishes to challenge the nature of the above section in court, they may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the meeting described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clara, at or prior to the meeting. In addition, judicial challenge may be limited or barred where the interested party has not sought and exhausted all available administrative remedies.

If a member of the public submits a speaker card for any agenda items, their name will appear in the Minutes. If no speaker card is submitted, the Minutes will reflect "Public Speaker."
In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), the City of Santa Clara will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in its services, programs, or activities, and will ensure that all existing facilities will be made accessible to the maximum extent feasible. The City of Santa Clara will generally, upon request, provide appropriate aids and services leading to effective communication for qualified persons with disabilities including those with speech, hearing, or vision impairments so they can participate equally in the City’s programs, services, and activities. The City of Santa Clara will make all reasonable modifications to policies and programs to ensure that people with disabilities have an equal opportunity to enjoy all of its programs, services, and activities.

Agendas and other written materials distributed during a public meeting that are public record will be made available by the City in an appropriate alternative format.

Contact the City Clerk’s Office at 1 408-615-2220 with your request for an alternative format copy of the agenda or other written materials.

Page 5 ends

City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-1525 Agenda Date: 12/13/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Action on a Resolution Extending AB 361 Implementation to Allow City Legislative Bodies to Hold Public Meetings Solely by Teleconference or Otherwise Electronically During the Governor’s Proclaimed COVID State of Emergency

COUNCIL PILLAR
Enhance Community Engagement and Transparency

BACKGROUND
On March 17, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 which suspended the Brown Act teleconferencing requirements so that legislative bodies could hold public meetings solely by teleconference, or otherwise electronically, without listing the teleconference locations and without any physical location, as long legislative bodies followed a set of requirements for noticing the meeting agenda and public participation, among other things. Subsequently on June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21, which sunset the Brown Act provisions of Executive Order N-29-20 on September 30, 2021.

On September 16, Governor Newsom signed AB 361 into law which allows local agencies to use teleconferencing without complying with specific Brown Act restrictions in certain state emergencies until January 1, 2024, at which point they are to be repealed, and the standard Brown Act teleconference requirements become effective again. The bill was an urgency measure, and it went into effect immediately.

On October 19, 2021, November 16, 2021, December 14, 2021, January 11, 2022, February 8, 2022, March 8, 2022, April 5, 2022, May 10, 2022, June 7, 2022, July 5, 2022, July 12, 2022, August 16, 2022, September 13, 2022, October 4, 2022, November 1, 2022, and November 15, 2022 the City Council approved Resolution Nos. 21-9013, 21-9023, 21-9038, 22-9042, 22-9051, 22-9058, 22- 9067, 22-9087, 22-9096, 22-9115, 22-9124, 22-9135, 22-9142, 22-9145, 22-9150, and 22-9160 respectively, to allow City Legislative bodies to hold public meetings solely by teleconference or otherwise electronically pursuant to AB 361.

DISCUSSION
AB 361 amended Government Code Section 54943 to allow a local agency to use teleconferencing for public meetings without requiring the teleconference location to be accessible to the public or a quorum of the members of the legislative body of the agency to participate from locations within the boundaries of the agency’s jurisdiction during a Governor-proclaimed state of emergency in certain circumstances.

In order for a local agency to utilize AB 361’s exemption to the Brown Act, there must be certain City of Santa Clara Printed on 12/9/2022Page 1 of 5
powered by Legistar™
22-1525 Agenda Date: 12/13/2022
emergency conditions present. These include:
· There being a state-proclaimed state of emergency, and state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing.
· The Council is meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees; or
· The Council is meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency and has determined, by majority vote, that in-person meetings would pose health and safety risks to attendees.

In order for the City’s legislative bodies to continue meeting remotely with the exemptions to the Brown Act provided for under AB 361, the Council is required to take certain actions, most of which the City is already implementing:
· The City must continue providing notice of meetings and continue to post agendas as the Brown Act requires to the agency’s website,
· The City must continue allowing for public access to the meeting, while allowing for a public comment period to directly address the legislative body pursuant to Brown Act’s other teleconferencing provisions,
· The City must continue giving notice for how the public can access the meeting and provide public comment, including a call-in or internet-based service option (no physical location required),
· The City must continue providing the public with the opportunity to comment in real time (with the option of additionally allowing comments to be submitted in advance, if the agency desires),
· The City must stop the meeting until public access is restored in the event of a service disruption, and
· No later than 30 days after the first teleconferencing meeting and every 30 days thereafter, the Council will have to reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency to determine if remote meeting procedures need to remain in place.

The legislative body must make certain findings by majority vote every 30 days to continue using the AB 361 Brown Act teleconferencing requirements. Because the City Council approved Resolution No. 22-9160 will expire on December 15, 2022. The City Council must adopt a new resolution in order to allows for its other legislative bodies to continue meeting remotely through January 12, 2023. Failure to approve this resolution would result in City Council, boards, and commissions meetings being unable to meet fully virtual without exposing the locations of each member’s location on the posted agendas.

Beginning on March 11, 2020 and continuing every 60 days thereafter, the City Council has continued its proclamation of local emergency based on substantial evidence that the public interest and necessity require the continuance of the proclamation of local emergency related to COVID-19.

On September 21, 2021, the Santa Clara County Public Health Officer recommended that public bodies continue to meet remotely to the extent possible due to the continued threat of COVID-19 to the community, the unique characteristics of public governmental meetings, and the continued increased safety protection that social distancing provides as one means by which to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission. On November 2, 2021, emergency use of the Pfizer COVID vaccine was authorized for children ages 5-11. On that same day, Santa Clara county moved back into the City of Santa Clara Printed on 12/9/2022Page 2 of 5
powered by Legistar™
22-1525 Agenda Date: 12/13/2022
substantial (orange) COVID-19 transmission tier. On November 22, 2021, Santa Clara county moved to the moderate (yellow) COVID-19 transmission tier. On November 25, 2021, scientists identified the latest COVID-19 variant, Omicron, which has prompted concern among scientists and public health officials because of an unusually high number of mutations that have the potential to make the virus more transmissible and less susceptible to existing vaccines. On December 13, 2021, the California Department of Public Health reinstituted its statewide mask mandate, requiring all individuals, regardless of their vaccination status, to wear face coverings in indoor public settings from December 15, 2021 through January 15, 2022 due to a 47% increase in the statewide seven- day average case rate and 14% increase in hospitalizations since Thanksgiving. In light of the rapid surge in cases due to the Omicron variant, on December 28, 2021, the County of Santa Clara Health Officer issued a health order requiring up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination for workers in certain higher- risk settings. The new order builds on recent changes in the State Health Officer’s vaccination requirements by mandating up-to-date vaccination by workers in certain healthcare and long-term care settings. As of February 3, 2021, new daily Covid-19 cases are on the decline since the surge from the Omicron variant. However, California Covid-19 deaths continue to rise and hospitalizations remain elevated. On February 27, 2022, the Santa Clara County Public Health Officer rescinded the health order requiring the use of face covering indoors effective March 2, 2022. However, the Santa Clara County Public Health Officer continues to recommend that all persons continue to wear face coverings when indoors. The California Department of Public Health continues to require masking in higher-risk settings such as public transit, healthcare facilities, shelters, jails, and long-term care facilities. As of March 26, 2022, the Omicron subvariant BA.2 is now the dominant variant in the US accounting for nearly 55% of new COVID-19 cases in the U.S. On March 29, 2022, the FDA authorized a second booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccines for people 50 years of age and older and some immunocompromised people. As of April 27, COVID-19 levels in wastewater concentrations in the greater Bay Area from Sacramento to Yolo, San Francisco and Santa Clara County and San Mateo County, were similar to what they were during the Delta surge in the summer of 2021, indicating another wave of the pandemic, although not resulting in an increase in hospitalizations. On April 28, Bay Area Rapid Transit reinstated its mask mandate effective immediately through July 18, which impacts the system’s 50 stations in five Bay Area counties. On May 10, 2022, Santa Clara County’s Health Officer Dr. Sara Cody warned that COVID case counts and hospitalizations are on the increase, with a weekly average of 552 cases and 80 to 100 people currently hospitalized, and urged everyone to consider wearing masks in high-risk settings, keep a stockpile of tests, and exercise caution when socializing indoors. On May 13, 2022, Bay Area health officers from the counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Sonoma and the City of Berkeley urged residents to wear face masks in indoor public settings as COVID-19 infections driven by highly contagious virus variants multiply throughout the region. As of May 31, 2022, new coronavirus cases in California increased 13.2% from the prior week and California ranked 10th among the states where coronavirus was spreading the fastest on a per person basis. As of June 13, 2022, new COVID-19 cases in California rose 32.3% from the prior week with 128,893 new cases, with California ranking fourth among the states where COVID-19 was spreading the fastest on a per-person basis, and Santa Clara County with the highest worst weekly outbreaks on a per-person basis. On June 15, 2022, an advisory panel to the FDA voted unanimously to recommend the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines for children ages five and younger. On June 18, 2022, the CDC and federal regulators authorized the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for children ages six months through four years old and the Moderna vaccine for children ages six months through five years old starting June 21, 2022. As of July 5, 2022, the new omicron subvariant known as BA.5 now comprises a majority of U.S. COVID- 19 cases, according to data released from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

City of Santa Clara Printed on 12/9/2022Page 3 of 5
powered by Legistar™
22-1525 Agenda Date: 12/13/2022
The BA.5, along with a related subvariant known as BA.4, has mutations that have shown an increased ability to evade the protection from vaccines and previous infection. As July 6, 20222, all nine local counties are back in the CDC's high-risk category for COVID-19 community levels, and the highly-transmissible BA.5 subvariant of the virus that causes COVID-19 is quickly taking over. On July 28, 2022, Bay Area Rapid Transit reinstated its mask mandate effective immediately through October 1, 2022, which impacts the system’s 50 stations in five Bay Area counties. On August 4, 2022, the CDC continued to classify Santa Clara County in the high community level for coronavirus, in its weekly update. On August 11, 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention streamlined its guidance for COVID exposure to recommending that everyone, regardless of vaccination or past infection, wear a high-quality mask for 10 days and get tested on day five after exposure to the virus. As of August 24, 2022, as California schools reopen for the fall semester with loosened COVID-19 protocols and low student vaccination rates among younger children, health experts are watching to see how schools do in the coming weeks as some experts expect another rise in cases when winter arrives. As of September 20, 2022, a new more transmissible COVID strain, BF.7, short for BA.5.2.1.7, is outpacing nearly all other variants of interest that scientists are tracking in the U.S. this fall. As of September 22, 2022, although daily death rates from COVID-19 have ticked down slightly from August, updated federal data shows that the U.S. is still losing on average 350 Americans to COVID-19 every day, and 225,000 people in the U.S. have been lost to the virus since the start of 2022. On October 4, 2022, the County Health Officer provided that while COVID-19 cases in Santa Clara County have trended down over the summer, that the level of virus circulating locally is likely higher than the county's case count. As of October 17, 2022, in Santa Clara County, only 12% of eligible people have received the updated booster since it was first offered in early September to fight the highly transmissible omicron variants leading to public health official fears of a winter surge with lagging booster vaccination rates. As of November 8, 2022, the U.S. daily average has increased 6% from two weeks ago, as 33 states and Washington D.C., have seen cases rise over the same time. On December 6, 2022, the Santa Clara County health leaders said there is a clear sign that COVID rates are rising, adding the county may see even more people contract coronavirus than what was reported during the omicron peak in January. These associated emergency conditions are on-going and there is a need to continue teleconferencing for public meetings without posting the teleconferencing locations on the agenda and without requiring the teleconference locations to be accessible to the public during the current Governor-proclaimed COVID-19 state of emergency. The state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the City’s legislative bodies to meet safely in person, and City officials continue to impose or recommend public health safety measures.

It is recommended that the Council adopt a resolution to make requisite findings to allow the City’s legislative bodies to hold public meetings solely by teleconference or otherwise electronically so long as the state of emergency and social distancing measures continue. The Council will have to take action on a monthly basis to reassess and reaffirm such findings to continue meeting remotely.

The proposed Resolution is attached.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action being considered does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) in that it is a governmental organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment.

City of Santa Clara Printed on 12/9/2022Page 4 of 5
powered by Legistar™
22-1525 Agenda Date: 12/13/2022

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact other than administrative time and expense.

COORDINATION
This report has been coordinated with the City Manager’s Office, City Attorney’s Office, and City Clerk’s Office.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City’s official-notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting. A hard copy of any agenda report may be requested by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 615-2220, email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or at the public
information desk at any City of Santa Clara public library.

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution finding the existence of the need to extend AB 361 implementation to allow the City’s legislative bodies to hold public meetings solely by teleconference or otherwise electronically pursuant to AB 361.

Reviewed by: Nadine Nader, Assistant City Manager
Approved by: Rajeev Batra, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution
City of Santa Clara Printed on 12/9/2022Page 5 of 5
powered by Legistar™
Resolution/Allowing City Legislative Bodies to Hold Teleconference Public Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 Page 1 of 5 Rev: 11/22/17

RESOLUTION NO. _

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA
FINDING THE EXISTENCE OF THE NEED TO EXTEND AB 361

IMPLEMENTATION TO ALLOW CITY LEGISLATIVE BODIES TO

HOLD PUBLIC MEETINGS SOLELY BY TELECONFERENCE OR
OTHERWISE ELECTRONICALLY PURSUANT TO AB 361

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Clara is committed to preserving and nurturing public access and participation in meetings of the City’s City Council, Council Committees, City Decision-Making Bodies (including Santa Clara Stadium Authority Board, Sports and Open Space Authority, Housing Authority, Successor Agency to the City of Santa Clara Redevelopment Agency, Bayshore North Project Enhancement Authority, and Public Facilities Financing Corporation), City Boards, Committees and Commissions, Taskforces, and Other City Advisory Entities; WHEREAS, all meetings of City of Santa Clara’s legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code Sections 54950, et seq., hereinafter referred to as the “Brown Act”), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City’s legislative bodies conduct their business; WHEREAS, the Brown Act allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings by teleconference and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to attend and to address the local legislative body, as long as the following requirements are met: (1) each teleconference location from which a member is participating is noticed on the agenda; (2) each teleconference location is accessible to the public; (3) members of the public must be able to address the body at each teleconference location; (4) at least one member of the legislative body must be physically present at the location specified in the meeting agenda; and (5) during teleconference meetings, at least a quorum of the members of the local body must participate from locations within the local body’s territorial jurisdiction;
WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 ----
Resolution/Allowing City Legislative Bodies to Hold Teleconference Public Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 Page 2 of 9 Rev: 11/22/17

which suspended the Brown Act teleconferencing requirements so that legislative bodies can hold public meetings solely by teleconference, or otherwise electronically, without listing the teleconference locations and without any physical location, as long as the agenda that is posted 72 hours in advance indicates that the members of the legislative body will be participating by teleconference, provides the teleconference or webinar access information by which the public may participate electronically, and lists the procedure for individuals with disabilities to request reasonable accommodations;
WHEREAS, on June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21, which sunsets the Brown Act provisions of Executive Order N-29-20 on September 30, 2021; WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed urgency ordinance AB 361 which allows a local agency to use teleconferencing for public meetings without posting the teleconferencing locations on the agenda and without requiring the teleconference locations to be accessible to the public during a Governor-proclaimed state of emergency pursuant to California Government Code Section 8625 et seq, if the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members of its legislative bodies to meet safely in person or state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; WHEREAS, in light of the continued state of emergency related to COVID-19, the Santa Clara County Public Health Officer continues to recommend that public bodies meet remotely to the extent possible, specifically including use of newly enacted AB 361 to maintain remote meetings under the Ralph M. Brown Act and similar laws, as outlined in their “Recommendation Regarding Continued Remote Public Meetings of Governmental Entities” issued on September 21, 2021;
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2021, November 16, 2021, December 14, 2021, January 11, 2022, February 8, 2022, March 8, 2022, April 5, 2022, May 10, 2022, June 7, 2022, July 5, 2022, July 12, 2022, August 16, 2022, September 13, 2022, October 4, 2022, November 1, 2022, and November 15, 2022 the City Council approved Resolutions Nos. 21-9013, 21-9023, 21-9038, Resolution/Allowing City Legislative Bodies to Hold Teleconference Public Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 Page 3 of 9 Rev: 11/22/17

22-9042, 22-9051, 22-9058, 22-9067, 22-9087, 22-9096, 22-9115, 22-9124, 22-9135, 22-9142, 22-9145, and 22-9160 respectively, to allow City Legislative bodies to hold public meetings solely by teleconference or otherwise electronically pursuant to AB 361; WHEREAS, on November 2, 2021, federal, state and local health officials authorized emergency use of the Pfizer COVID vaccine for children ages 5-11, and may consider emergency authorization of the COVID vaccine for children under age 5 within the next few months;
WHEREAS, on November 22, 2021, Santa Clara County moved into the moderate (orange) COVID-19 transmission tier;
WHEREAS, on November 25, 2021, scientists identified the latest COVID-19 variant, Omicron, which has prompted concern among scientists and public health officials because of an unusually high number of mutations that have the potential to make the virus more transmissible and less susceptible to existing vaccines; WHEREAS, on December 13, 2021, the California Department of Public Health reinstituted its statewide mask mandate, requiring all individuals, regardless of their vaccination status, to wear face coverings in indoor public settings from December 15, 2021 through January 15, 2022 due to a 47% increase in the statewide seven-day average case rate and 14% increase in hospitalizations since Thanksgiving;
WHEREAS, in light of the rapid surge in cases due to the Omicron variant, on December 28, 2021, the County of Santa Clara Health Officer issued a health order requiring up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination for workers in certain higher-risk settings. The new order builds on recent changes in the State Health Officer’s vaccination requirements by mandating up-to-date vaccination by workers in certain healthcare and long-term care settings; WHEREAS, as of February 3, 2021, new daily Covid-19 cases are on the decline since the surge from the Omicron variant. However, California Covid-19 deaths continue to rise and hospitalizations remain elevated;
Resolution/Allowing City Legislative Bodies to Hold Teleconference Public Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 Page 4 of 9 Rev: 11/22/17

WHEREAS, on February 27, 2022, the Santa Clara County Public Health Officer rescinded the health order requiring the use of face covering indoors effective March 2, 2022. However, the Santa Clara County Public Health Officer continues to recommend that all persons continue to wear face coverings when indoors. The California Department of Public Health continues to require masking in higher-risk settings such as public transit, healthcare facilities, shelters, jails, and long-term care facilities. While Santa Clara County has met the required masking metrics (80% of the population vaccinated, COVID-19 hospitalizations in the jurisdiction are low and stable, seven consecutive days with the seven-day rolling average of new cases at 550 or below) to transition to a strong recommendation for indoor masking, the county remains in the “medium” level of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s new COVID-19 community level framework;
WHEREAS, as of March 26, 2022, the Omicron subvariant BA.2 is now the dominant variant in the US accounting for nearly 55% of new COVID-19 cases in the U.S.; WHEREAS, on March 29, 2022, the FDA authorized a second booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccines for people 50 years of age and older and some immunocompromised people; WHEREAS, as of April 27, COVID-19 levels in wastewater concentrations in the greater Bay Area from Sacramento to Yolo, San Francisco and Santa Clara County and San Mateo County, were similar to what they were during the Delta surge in the summer of 2021, indicating another wave of the pandemic, although not resulting in an increase in hospitalizations; WHEREAS, on April 28, Bay Area Rapid Transit reinstated its mask mandate effective immediately through July 18, which impacts the system’s 50 stations in five Bay Area counties; WHEREAS, on May 10, 2022, Santa Clara County’s Health Officer Dr. Sara Cody warned that COVID case counts and hospitalizations are on the increase, with a weekly average of 552 cases and 80 to 100 people currently hospitalized, and urged everyone to consider wearing masks in high-risk settings, keep a stockpile of tests, and exercise caution when socializing indoors;
Resolution/Allowing City Legislative Bodies to Hold Teleconference Public Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 Page 5 of 9 Rev: 11/22/17

WHEREAS, on May 13, 2022, Bay Area health officers from the counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Sonoma and the City of Berkeley urged residents to wear face masks in indoor public settings as COVID-19 infections driven by highly contagious virus variants multiply throughout the region;
WHEREAS, as of May 31, 2022, new coronavirus cases in California increased 13.2% from the prior week and California ranked 10th among the states where coronavirus was spreading the fastest on a per person basis; WHEREAS, on June 3, 2022, due to the continued increase in positive COVID-19 cases in the City employee workforce and local community, the City extended the mandatory mask mandate for all City employees, regardless of vaccination status, through July 1, 2022;
WHEREAS, as of June 13, 2022, new COVID-19 cases in California rose 32.3% from the prior week with 128,893 new cases, with California ranking fourth among the states where COVID-19 was spreading the fastest on a per-person basis, and Santa Clara County with the highest worst weekly outbreaks on a per-person basis;
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2022, an advisory panel to the FDA voted unanimously to recommend the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines for children ages five and younger; WHEREAS, on June 18, 2022, the CDC and federal regulators authorized the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for children ages six months through four years old and the Moderna vaccine for children ages six months through five years old starting June 21, 2022; WHEREAS, as of July 5, 2022, the new omicron subvariant known as BA.5 now comprises a majority of U.S. COVID-19 cases, according to data released from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The BA.5, along with a related subvariant known as BA.4, has mutations that have shown an increased ability to evade the protection from vaccines and previous infection;
WHEREAS, as of July 6, 2022, all nine local counties are back in the CDC's high-risk category Resolution/Allowing City Legislative Bodies to Hold Teleconference Public Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 Page 6 of 9 Rev: 11/22/17

for COVID-19 community levels, and the highly-transmissible BA.5 subvariant of the virus that causes COVID-19 is quickly taking over;
WHEREAS, on July 28, 2022, Bay Area Rapid Transit reinstated its mask mandate effective immediately through October 1, 2022, which impacts the system’s 50 stations in five Bay Area counties;
WHEREAS, on August 4, 2022, the CDC continued to classify Santa Clara County in the high community level for coronavirus, in its weekly update; WHEREAS, on August 11, 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention streamlined its guidance for COVID exposure to recommending that everyone, regardless of vaccination or past infection, wear a high-quality mask for 10 days and get tested on day five after exposure to the virus;
WHEREAS, as of August 24, 2022, as California schools reopen for the fall semester with loosened COVID-19 protocols and low student vaccination rates among younger children, health experts are watching to see how schools do in the coming weeks as some experts expect another rise in cases when winter arrives;
WHEREAS, as of September 20, 2022, a new more transmissible COVID strain, BF.7, short for BA.5.2.1.7, is outpacing nearly all other variants of interest that scientists are tracking in the U.S. this fall;
WHEREAS, as of September 22, 2022, although daily death rates from COVID-19 have ticked down slightly from August, updated federal data shows that the U.S. is still losing on average 350 Americans to COVID-19 every day, and 225,000 people in the U.S. have been lost to the virus since the start of 2022;
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2022, the County Health Officer provided that while COVID-19 cases in Santa Clara County have trended down over the summer, that the level of virus circulating locally is likely higher than the county's case count; Resolution/Allowing City Legislative Bodies to Hold Teleconference Public Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 Page 7 of 9 Rev: 11/22/17

WHEREAS, as of October 17, 2022, in Santa Clara County, only 12% of eligible people have received the updated booster since it was first offered in early September to fight the highly transmissible omicron variants leading to public health official fears of a winter surge with lagging booster vaccination rates;
WHEREAS, as of November 8, 2022, the U.S. daily average has increased 6% from two weeks ago, as 33 states and Washington D.C., have seen cases rise over the same time; WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022, the Santa Clara County health leaders said there is a clear sign that COVID rates are rising, adding the county may see even more people contract coronavirus than what was reported during the omicron peak in January; WHEREAS, Government Code Section 54953(e)(3) requires that the City Council review the need and make findings for continuing the teleconferencing without complying with the agenda posting and public comment requirements at least once every thirty (30) days until Governor terminates the state of emergency; and,
WHEREAS, the associated emergency conditions are on-going and there is a need to teleconference for public meetings without posting the teleconferencing locations on the agenda and without requiring the teleconference locations to be accessible to the public during the current Governor-proclaimed COVID-19 state of emergency and if approved, will be in effect for 30 days and will expire on January 12, 2023 unless staff returns to City Council on or before January 12, 2023 to request to continue the need for teleconferencing.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the City Council hereby finds that the state of emergency conditions related to COVID-19, as set forth in Resolution No. 22-9160 adopted on November 15, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference, are on-going.

2. That the City Council finds that there is a need to teleconference for public meetings without posting the teleconferencing locations on the agenda and without requiring the Resolution/Allowing City Legislative Bodies to Hold Teleconference Public Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 Page 8 of 9 Rev: 11/22/17

teleconference locations to be accessible to the public during the current Governor-proclaimed COVID-19 state of emergency.

3. That the City Council finds that the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of members of the City’s City Council, Council Committees, City Decision-Making Bodies (including Santa Clara Stadium Authority, Sports and Open Space Authority, Housing Authority, Successor Agency to the City of Santa Clara Redevelopment Agency, Bayshore North Project Enhancement Authority, and Public Facilities Financing Corporation), City Boards, Committees and Commissions, Taskforces, and Other City Advisory Entities to meet safely in person.

4. That City officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing in City facilities.

5. That members of the City Council, Council Committees, City Decision-Making Bodies, City Boards (including Santa Clara Stadium Authority Board, Sports and Open Space Authority, Housing Authority, Successor Agency to the City of Santa Clara Redevelopment Agency, Bayshore North Project Enhancement Authority, and Public Facilities Financing Corporation), Committees and Commissions, Taskforces, and Other City Advisory Entities are authorized to use teleconferencing, or other electronic means, to hold its public meetings without noticing the teleconferenced locations on the agenda, without making teleconferenced or physical locations accessible to the public, without posting agendas at teleconferenced locations, without requiring members of the legislative bodies to be physically present at the meeting, and without requiring a quorum of the members of the legislative body to participate from locations with the City’s jurisdiction, as long as the agenda that is posted at least 72 hours in advance indicates that members of the legislative body may be participating electronically, provides the teleconference or webinar access information by which the public may participate electronically, and lists the procedure for individuals with disabilities to request reasonable accommodations, in compliance with AB 361, Government Code Section 54953(e).

6. That the Assistant City Clerk is hereby directed to report to the City Council within thirty

Resolution/Allowing City Legislative Bodies to Hold Teleconference Public Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 Page 9 of 9 Rev: 11/22/17

(30) days on the need to further continue teleconferencing for public meetings without posting the teleconferencing locations on the agenda and without requiring the teleconference locations to be accessible to the public during the current Governor-proclaimed COVID-19 state of emergency.

7. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED

AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE __ DAY OF _________ , 2022, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCILORS:

NOES: CO UNCILORS:

ABSENT: COUNCILORS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS:

ATTEST:

NORA PIMENTEL, MMC

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA

Attachments incorporated by reference: None
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-897 Agenda Date: 12/13/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Declaring the Results of the Canvass of Returns of the Consolidated General Municipal Election held on November 8, 2022 with the Statewide Gubernatorial Election

COUNCIL PILLAR
Enhance Community Engagement and Transparency

BACKGROUND
A Consolidated General Municipal Election was held on November 8, 2022 with the Statewide Gubernatorial Election. California elections Code Section 9296 and 10262 require that the City Council adopt a Resolution reciting the facts of the election no later than the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting following presentation of the 30-day canvass of returns.

DISCUSSION
Consistent with the California Elections Code, staff brings forward this report and has prepared a resolution for adoption. Attached is the official canvass of the returns of said election with the appropriate provisions of the California Elections Code. The results of said election is as follows:

A. TOTAL NUMBER OF BALLOTS CAST IN THE CITY:

1. Registered Voters 57,474

2. Total Ballots Cast 31,361

3. Voter Turnout 54.57%
B. OFFICE AND NAMES OF CANDIDATES AND TOTAL VOTES RECEIVED:

Mayor
Lisa M. Gillmor 14,838 51.34%
Anthony J. Becker 14,062 48.66%
Total Votes Cast for Mayor: 28,900
Councilmember - District 2
Raj Chahal 2,904 62.56%
Larry McColloch 1,738 37.44%
Total Votes Cast for District 2: 4,642
Councilmember - District 3
City of Santa Clara Printed on 12/9/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
22-897 Agenda Date: 12/13/2022
Karen Hardy 2,824 64.28%
Christian D. Pellecchia 1,569 35.72%
Total Votes Cast for District 3: 4,393
C. MEASURES AND TOTAL VOTES RECEIVED:

Measure G - No Tax Increase/Services Protection
i. Yes 24,643 84.19%
ii. No 4,629 15.81%
Total Votes Cast for Measure: 29,272
Measure H - Business License Update/Tax Equity
iii. Yes 17,329 59.50%
iv. No 11,797 40.50%
Total Votes Cast for Measure: 29,126

FISCAL IMPACT
There was no fiscal impact in the preparation of this report.

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution reciting the facts of the Consolidated Municipal Election held on November 8, 2022 with the Statewide Gubernatorial Election and declare the following candidates elected: for Councilmember in Council District 2 Raj Chahal, for Councilmember in Council District 3 Karen Hardy, and for Mayor Lisa M. Gillmor, each for a four-year term ending 2026.

Reviewed by Nora Pimentel, Assistant City Clerk
Approved by: Hosam Haggag, City Clerk

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution Declaring the Results of the Election

2. Exhibit A - Certificate of Election and Official Results (Candidates)

3. Exhibit B - Certificate of Election and Official Results (Measures G and H) City of Santa Clara Printed on 12/9/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
Resolution/Certifying Election Results Page 1 of 3
Rev: 12-9-2022
RESOLUTION NO. _______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA

RECITING THE FACT S OF THE CONSOLIDATED MUNICIPAL

ELECTION HELD IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA ON
NOVEMBER 8, 2022, WITH THE STATEWIDE GUBERNATORIAL

ELECTION DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ELECTION AND

SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, a Consolidated Municipal Election was held with the Statewide Gubernatorial Election and conducted in the City of Santa Clara, on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, as required by law;
WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law; that voting precincts were properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California for holding of elections in charter cities; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 22-9097 (a resolution calling for a consolidated municipal election to be held on November 8, 2022 with the Statewide Gubernatorial election for electing two councilmembers one for Council District 2 and one for Council District 3 and for electing one Mayor) adopted on June 7, 2022; Resolution No. 22-9116 (a resolution calling for a consolidated special municipal election to be held on November 8, 2022 with the Statewide Gubernatorial election for a ballot measure known as the City of Santa Clara No Tax Increase/Services Protection Measure) adopted on July 5, 2022; and Resolution No. 22-9130 (a resolution calling for a consolidated special municipal election to be held on November 8, 2022 with the Statewide Gubernatorial election for a ballot measure known as the City of Santa Clara Business License Update/Tax Equity Measure) adopted on July 12, 2022, the County Registrar of Voters canvassed the returns of the election and has certified to this City Council, the results are received, attached and made part of hereof as Exhibit A and B.

Resolution/Certifying Election Results Page 2 of 3
Rev: 12-9-2022

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the total number of votes (ballots): 31,361

2. That the names of the persons voted for at the election for Mayor, Lisa M. Gillmor; for Councilmember in Council District 2 Raj Chahal; and for Councilmember in Council District 3 Karen Hardy.

3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the District/City to the persons named above for the respective offices for which the persons were a candidate are listed in the attached Exhibit A.

4. That the City Council does declare and determine that : Lisa M Gillmor was re-elected as Mayor, Raj Chahal was re-elected as Councilmember in Council District 2, Karen Hardy was re- elected as Councilmember in Council District 3, each for a four-year term ending 2026.

5. That the City does declare and determine that Measure G City of Santa Clara No Tax Increase/Services Protection Measure passed with the following results: votes in favor of Measure G – 24,643; and votes against Measure G – 4,629 as listed in the attached Exhibit B.

6. That the City does declare and determine that Measure H City of Santa Clara Business License Update/Tax Equity Measure passed with the following results: votes in favor of Measure H – 17,329; and votes against Measure H – 11,797 as listed in the attached Exhibit B.

7. That the Assistant City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter into the book of original resolutions.

8. C onstitutionality, severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this resolution is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid for any reason such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the resolution. The City of Santa Clara, California, hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase, and word thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section(s), subsection(s), Resolution/Certifying Election Results Page 3 of 3
Rev: 12-9-2022
sentence(s), clause(s), phrase(s), or word(s) be declared invalid.

9. Effective date. This resolution shall become eff ective immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED

AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA , AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 13th day of December 2022, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCILORS:

NOES: COUNCILORS:

ABSENT: COUNCILORS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS:

ATTEST: ______________________________

HOSAM HAGGAG

CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA
Attachments incorporated by reference:

1. Exhibit A – Certificate of Election and Official Results (Candidates)

2. Exhibit B – Certificate of Election and Official Results (Measures G and H) County of Santa Clara
Registrar of Voters

1555 Berger Drive, Bldg. 2
San Jose, CA 95112
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 611360, San Jose, CA 95161-1360 (408) 299-VOTE (8683) 866-430-VOTE (8683) FAX: (408) 998-7314 www.sccvote.org

Board of Supervisors: Mike Wasserman, Cindy Chavez, Otto Lee , Susan Ellenberg , S. Joseph Simitian County Executive: Jeffrey V. Smith

December 8, 2022 Via email: [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Mr. Hosam Haggag
Ms. Nora Pimentel
Ms. Deon Sailes
City of Santa Clara
1500 Warburton Ave
Santa Clara, CA 95050

RE: November 8, 2022 General Election Certification of Election Results for City Contests

Dear Mr. Haggag, et. al.:

Enclosed are the Certificate(s) of Election Results, Official Results, and Statement of Votes for the contest(s) in your jurisdiction.

Pursuant to Elections Code Section 15400, the Governing Board should accept the Statement of Votes and Certificate of Election Results and declar e the totals to be the final results of the election.

Please feel free to contact me at 408-282-3041 should you have questions or need anything further.

Sincerely,

Bren Lehr, Election Division Coordinator
Registrar of Voters
Candidate Services Division

Enclosures

CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION RESULTS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA )
I, Shannon Bushey, Registrar of Voters of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, hereby declare :

1. A General Election was held in the County of Santa Clara, for the City of Santa Clara, on November 8, 2022 for the purpose of electing one (1) full-term Mayor, and two (2) full-term Council Members, Districts 2 & 3 to the Governing Board.

2. The official canvass of the returns of this election was conducted by the Office of the Registrar of Voters in accordance with the appropriate provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California.

3. The Statement of Votes Cast, now on file in my office and attached hereto, shows the number of votes for each candidate for the Governing Board of the City of Santa Clara and in each of the precincts and that the t9tal shown for each candidate are true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and Official Seal this 8th day of December 2022.

Candidate Party Total
GAVIN NEWSOM DEM 379,377 70.01%
BRIAN DAHLE REP 162,518 29.99%
Total Votes 541,895
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Governor (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
ELENI KOUNALAKIS DEM 375,311 70.27%
ANGELA E. UNDERWOOD
JACOBS REP 158,760 29.73%
Total Votes 534,071
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Lieutenant Governor (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
SHIRLEY N. WEBER DEM 373,754 70.20%
ROB BERNOSKY REP 158,629 29.80%
Total Votes 532,383
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Secretary of State (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
MALIA M. COHEN DEM 337,048 63.26%
LANHEE J. CHEN REP 195,791 36.74%
Total Votes 532,839
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Controller (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Election Summary Report
Santa Clara
Official Final Results
November 08, 2022
General Election
Elector Group Counting Group Voters Cast Registered Voters Turnout Total Precinct 40,694 4.03%
Vote by Mail 509,908 50.51%
Total 550,602 1,009,422 54.55%
12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 1 of 27
Candidate Party Total
FIONA MA DEM 366,786 69.16%
JACK M. GUERRERO REP 163,551 30.84%
Total Votes 530,337
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Treasurer (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
ROB BONTA DEM 366,414 68.90%
NATHAN HOCHMAN REP 165,381 31.10%
Total Votes 531,795
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Attorney General (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
RICARDO LARA DEM 365,198 69.65%
ROBERT HOWELL REP 159,164 30.35%
Total Votes 524,362
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Insurance Commissioner (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
SALLY J. LIEBER DEM 362,440 69.25%
PETER COE VERBICA REP 160,972 30.75%
Total Votes 523,412
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
State Board of Equalization, District 2 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
ALEX PADILLA DEM 383,152 71.43%
MARK P. MEUSER REP 153,249 28.57%
Total Votes 536,401
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
United States Senator, Full Term (Vote for 1)
12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 2 of 27
Candidate Party Total
ALEX PADILLA DEM 376,952 71.36%
MARK P. MEUSER REP 151,279 28.64%
Total Votes 528,231
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
United States Senator, Partial/Unexpired Term (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
ANNA G. ESHOO DEM 109,761 57.28%
RISHI KUMAR DEM 81,866 42.72%
Total Votes 191,627
Precincts Reported: 255 of 255 (100.00%)
United States Representative, District 16 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
RO KHANNA DEM 109,900 71.32%
RITESH TANDON REP 44,186 28.68%
Total Votes 154,086
Precincts Reported: 201 of 201 (100.00%)
United States Representative, District 17 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
ZOE LOFGREN DEM 55,595 69.28%
PETER HERNANDEZ REP 24,648 30.72%
Total Votes 80,243
Precincts Reported: 164 of 164 (100.00%)
United States Representative, District 18 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
JIMMY PANETTA DEM 58,959 67.05%
JEFF GORMAN REP 28,975 32.95%
Total Votes 87,934
Precincts Reported: 134 of 134 (100.00%)
United States Representative, District 19 (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 3 of 27
Candidate Party Total
AISHA WAHAB DEM 54,094 52.00%
LILY MEI DEM 49,930 48.00%
Total Votes 104,024
Precincts Reported: 157 of 157 (100.00%)
State Senate, District 10 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
MARC BERMAN DEM 85,107 73.39%
TIM DEC REP 30,851 26.61%
Total Votes 115,958
Precincts Reported: 132 of 132 (100.00%)
Assembly District 23 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
ALEX LEE DEM 29,785 67.60%
BOB BRUNTON REP 14,274 32.40%
Total Votes 44,059
Precincts Reported: 77 of 77 (100.00%)
Assembly District 24 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
ASH KALRA DEM 74,546 70.04%
TED STROLL REP 31,893 29.96%
Total Votes 106,439
Precincts Reported: 193 of 193 (100.00%)
Assembly District 25 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
EVAN LOW DEM 81,595 74.04%
TIM GORSULOWSKY REP 28,616 25.96%
Total Votes 110,211
Precincts Reported: 146 of 146 (100.00%)
Assembly District 26 (Vote for 1)
12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 4 of 27
Candidate Party Total
GAIL PELLERIN DEM 79,437 63.50%
LIZ LAWLER REP 45,654 36.50%
Total Votes 125,091
Precincts Reported: 179 of 179 (100.00%)
Assembly District 28 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
ROBERT RIVAS DEM 11,262 62.25%
STEPHANIE L. CASTRO REP 6,831 37.75%
Total Votes 18,093
Precincts Reported: 27 of 27 (100.00%)
Assembly District 29 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
Yes 345,820 80.48%
No 83,873 19.52%
Total Votes 429,693
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Chief Justice Supreme Court (Patricia Guerrero) (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 336,098 79.22%
No 88,139 20.78%
Total Votes 424,237
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Associate Justice Supreme Court (Goodwin Liu) (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 328,513 79.11%
No 86,728 20.89%
Total Votes 415,241
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Associate Justice Supreme Court (Martin J. Jenkins) (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 5 of 27
Candidate Party Total
Yes 323,593 78.44%
No 88,943 21.56%
Total Votes 412,536
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Associate Justice Supreme Court (Joshua P. Groban) (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 328,794 80.24%
No 80,945 19.76%
Total Votes 409,739
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Presiding Justice Court of Appeal 6th Dist. (Mary J. Greenwood) (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 318,356 78.35%
No 87,989 21.65%
Total Votes 406,345
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Associate Justice Court of Appeal 6th Dist. (Charles E. Wilson II) (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 311,262 78.68%
No 84,362 21.32%
Total Votes 395,624
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Associate Justice Court of Appeal 6th Dist. (Cynthia C. Lie) (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
TONY K. THURMOND 304,175 69.41%
LANCE RAY CHRISTENSEN 134,034 30.59%
Total Votes 438,209
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
State Superintendent of Public Instruction (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 6 of 27
Candidate Party Total
MAIMONA AFZAL BERTA 25,250 57.12%
MAGDALENA CARRASCO 18,953 42.88%
Total Votes 44,203
Precincts Reported: 110 of 110 (100.00%)
Santa Clara County Board of Education, TA #6 Governing Board (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
RAEENA LARI 36,514 52.64%
NATALIE PRCEVSKI 32,854 47.36%
Total Votes 69,368
Precincts Reported: 139 of 139 (100.00%)
Santa Clara County Board of Education, TA #7 Governing Board (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
KATHY CHÁVEZ NAPOLI 5,462 61.89%
TERRY PEABODY 3,364 38.11%
Total Votes 8,826
Precincts Reported: 17 of 17 (100.00%)
Gavilan Joint CCD, TA #1 Governing Board (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
ALICIA M. CORTEZ 4,777 60.01%
STEVEN M. KINSELLA 3,184 39.99%
Total Votes 7,961
Precincts Reported: 27 of 27 (100.00%)
Gavilan Joint CCD, TA #2 Governing Board, Short Term (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
GABRIEL GUTIERREZ 6,020 60.43%
TARA BEVINGTON 3,942 39.57%
Total Votes 9,962
Precincts Reported: 24 of 24 (100.00%)
Gavilan Joint CCD, TA #3 Governing Board (Vote for 1)
12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 7 of 27
Candidate Party Total
KAREN MARTINEZ 10,811 60.04%
ANTHONY MACIAS 7,195 39.96%
Total Votes 18,006
Precincts Reported: 46 of 46 (100.00%)
SJ - Evergreen CCD, TA #2 Governing Board (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
TONY ALEXANDER 20,108 65.46%
LEO CORTEZ 10,608 34.54%
Total Votes 30,716
Precincts Reported: 65 of 65 (100.00%)
SJ - Evergreen CCD, TA #3 Governing Board, Short Term (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
MARIA R. FUENTES 13,534 51.88%
BUU CHAU THAI 12,552 48.12%
Total Votes 26,086
Precincts Reported: 46 of 46 (100.00%)
SJ - Evergreen CCD, TA #4 Governing Board (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
KELLY YIP-CHUAN 10,788 29.07%
CHRIS NORWOOD 10,319 27.80%
ANU NAKKA 6,612 17.81%
ROBERT JUNG 5,325 14.35%
SURAJ "SUN"
VISWANATHAN 4,071 10.97%
Total Votes 37,115
Precincts Reported: 20 of 20 (100.00%)
Milpitas Unified SD Governing Board (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
NANCY ALTMAN-PALM 1,988 50.96%
WENDY SULLIVAN 1,913 49.04%
Total Votes 3,901
Precincts Reported: 11 of 11 (100.00%)
Morgan Hill Unified SD, TA #1 Governing Board (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 8 of 27
Candidate Party Total
JOHN T. HORNER 2,325 64.62%
JAMES DILL 1,273 35.38%
Total Votes 3,598
Precincts Reported: 11 of 11 (100.00%)
Morgan Hill Unified SD, TA #2 Governing Board (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
TERRI L. EVES KNUDSEN 1,249 43.38%
DENNIS PAUL DELISLE 817 28.38%
ARMANDO B. BENAVIDES 813 28.24%
Total Votes 2,879
Precincts Reported: 9 of 9 (100.00%)
Morgan Hill Unified SD, TA #3 Governing Board (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
PAMELA GARDINER 1,757 53.00%
CAROL GITTENS 1,558 47.00%
Total Votes 3,315
Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
Morgan Hill Unified SD, TA #4 Governing Board (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
SHANA SEGAL 18,813 38.86%
SHOUNAK DHARAP 14,320 29.58%
NICOLE CHIU-WANG 10,691 22.09%
INGRID CAMPOS 4,584 9.47%
Total Votes 48,408
Precincts Reported: 24 of 24 (100.00%)
Palo Alto Unified SD Governing Board (Vote for 2)
Candidate Party Total
JOSE MAGAÑA 9,649 72.88%
ANDRES MACIAS 3,590 27.12%
Total Votes 13,239
Precincts Reported: 23 of 23 (100.00%)
San Jose Unified SD, TA #2 Governing Board (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 9 of 27
Candidate Party Total
VICKIE FAIRCHILD 4,393 74.71%
NESTOR TORIBIO 1,487 25.29%
Total Votes 5,880
Precincts Reported: 10 of 10 (100.00%)
Santa Clara Unified SD, TA #3 Governing Board (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
ANDREW RATERMANN 2,632 60.20%
KIMBERLEY WILLIAMS 1,740 39.80%
Total Votes 4,372
Precincts Reported: 12 of 12 (100.00%)
Santa Clara Unified SD, TA #4 Governing Board (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
JAMES KIM 6,602 55.75%
ROBERT VARICH 5,240 44.25%
Total Votes 11,842
Precincts Reported: 18 of 18 (100.00%)
Campbell Union High SD, TA #1 Governing Board (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
ELISABETH HALLIDAY 5,010 44.38%
MICHAEL WINTER 4,062 35.98%
DAVID LEE SABES 2,218 19.65%
Total Votes 11,290
Precincts Reported: 21 of 21 (100.00%)
Campbell Union High SD, TA #2 Governing Board (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
JASON BAKER 8,784 76.40%
ADAM ROCHA 2,713 23.60%
Total Votes 11,497
Precincts Reported: 18 of 18 (100.00%)
Campbell Union High SD, TA #3 Governing Board (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 10 of 27
Candidate Party Total
LORENA CHAVEZ 70,423 30.32%
VAN LE 64,583 27.81%
J. MANUEL HERRERA 53,176 22.90%
PETER PHAM 44,075 18.98%
Total Votes 232,257
Precincts Reported: 210 of 210 (100.00%)
East Side Union High SD Governing Board (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total

NAOMI NAKANO-
MATSUMOTO 39,649 29.28%
ROSA KIM 33,279 24.58%
STANLEY KOU 31,412 23.20%
LINDA R. PRICE 22,787 16.83%
ANDREW AARON ARNESS 8,272 6.11%
Total Votes 135,399
Precincts Reported: 67 of 67 (100.00%)
Fremont Union High SD Governing Board (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
ALEX SHULTZ 12,103 25.87%
STEVE CHEN 11,755 25.13%
MISTY DAVIES 9,277 19.83%
DAVID GUIDRY 6,955 14.87%
CHRIS MILLER 6,686 14.29%
Total Votes 46,776
Precincts Reported: 43 of 43 (100.00%)
Los Gatos-Saratoga UHSD Governing Board (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
CATHERINE VONNEGUT 20,519 25.09%
ESMERALDA ORTIZ 20,194 24.69%
THIDA CORNES 14,012 17.13%
ERIC MARK 13,144 16.07%

CARROL ANN TITUS-
ZAMBRE 7,558 9.24%
JACQUIE TANNER 6,358 7.77%
Total Votes 81,785
Precincts Reported: 38 of 38 (100.00%)
Mt View-Los Altos UHSD Governing Board (Vote for 3)
12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 11 of 27
Candidate Party Total
MINH PHAM 9,377 24.80%
LINDA CHÁVEZ 9,206 24.35%
ANDRÉS QUINTERO 8,203 21.69%
RICARDO GARCIA 7,531 19.92%
JOSEPH R. CORONA 3,494 9.24%
Total Votes 37,811
Precincts Reported: 49 of 49 (100.00%)
Alum Rock Union SD Governing Board, Full Term (Vote for 3) Candidate Party Total
ERNESTO A. BEJARANO 7,439 42.43%
MINH NGUYEN 7,222 41.19%
OMAR VASQUEZ 2,873 16.39%
Total Votes 17,534
Precincts Reported: 49 of 49 (100.00%)
Alum Rock Union SD Governing Board, Short Term (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
THELMA B. BOAC 12,248 32.64%
HUGO A. JIMENEZ 11,760 31.34%
JARIA JAUG 9,303 24.80%
LIJUAN PUZAR 4,208 11.22%
Total Votes 37,519
Precincts Reported: 31 of 31 (100.00%)
Berryessa Union SD Governing Board (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
CAROL PRESUNKA 5,707 28.34%
NICK VILLALOBOS 5,461 27.11%
JAROD MIDDLETON 5,074 25.19%
MONTE DAUER 3,899 19.36%
Total Votes 20,141
Precincts Reported: 13 of 13 (100.00%)
Cambrian SD Governing Board (Vote for 3)
12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 12 of 27
Candidate Party Total
RICHARD NGUYEN 3,453 70.96%
JON ERIC FREEDMAN 1,413 29.04%
Total Votes 4,866
Precincts Reported: 14 of 14 (100.00%)
Campbell Union SD, TA #1 Governing Board (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
CHRIS MILLER 2,760 65.48%
ALAN CROWNOVER 1,455 34.52%
Total Votes 4,215
Precincts Reported: 8 of 8 (100.00%)
Campbell Union SD, TA #4 Governing Board (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
DANIELLE M.S. COHEN 4,043 63.41%
VIVIAN MILLS 2,333 36.59%
Total Votes 6,376
Precincts Reported: 10 of 10 (100.00%)
Campbell Union SD, TA #5 Governing Board (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
JERRY LIU 26,106 28.03%
AVA CHIAO 25,011 26.85%
SATHEESH MADHATHIL 22,576 24.24%
DARCY AUGUST PAUL 19,457 20.89%
Total Votes 93,150
Precincts Reported: 46 of 46 (100.00%)
Cupertino Union SD Governing Board (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
MARY HIEN POLLETT 13,779 25.31%
STAN ROSE 12,041 22.11%
JIM ZITO 11,886 21.83%
MARISA HANSON 9,714 17.84%
CHRISTOPHER CORPUS 7,031 12.91%
Total Votes 54,451
Precincts Reported: 42 of 42 (100.00%)
Evergreen SD Governing Board, Full Term (Vote for 3)
12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 13 of 27
Candidate Party Total
JEREMY BAROUSSE 13,536 59.15%
ALECIA S. KELLEY 9,350 40.85%
Total Votes 22,886
Precincts Reported: 42 of 42 (100.00%)
Evergreen SD Governing Board, Short Term (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
STEVEN SANCHEZ 6,172 19.07%
MARC COOPER 5,649 17.45%
RUDY J. RODRIGUEZ 5,467 16.89%
MILAN BALINTON 5,184 16.02%
TAMMY LARIZ 4,977 15.38%
MANUEL F. MARTINEZ 4,916 15.19%
Total Votes 32,365
Precincts Reported: 28 of 28 (100.00%)
Franklin-McKinley SD Governing Board (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
BRYAN JOHNSON 11,719 29.90%
VLADIMIR IVANOVIC 10,332 26.36%
VAISHALI "SHALI" SIRKAY 10,301 26.29%
SARA FARR 6,837 17.45%
Total Votes 39,189
Precincts Reported: 21 of 21 (100.00%)
Los Altos SD Governing Board (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
TAUNYA JACO 3,229 71.36%
ROBYN LYNETTE SCHLICE 1,296 28.64%
Total Votes 4,525
Precincts Reported: 11 of 11 (100.00%)
Oak Grove SD, TA #5 Governing Board (Vote for 1)
12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 14 of 27
Candidate Party Total
JEFF TANG 1,422 30.08%

KATHERINE KASOLAS-
JACOBSON 1,353 28.62%
RENEE LO 1,001 21.17%
LYNN DINSAY LIMQUECO 952 20.14%
Total Votes 4,728
Precincts Reported: 8 of 8 (100.00%)
Orchard SD Governing Board (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
SHEILA BILLINGS 10,246 30.67%
DOUGLAS B. EVANS 8,998 26.93%
THOMAS E. ROSSMEISSL 8,810 26.37%
ZOILA HERRERA ROLLINS 5,358 16.04%
Total Votes 33,412
Precincts Reported: 20 of 20 (100.00%)
Union SD Governing Board (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
SYLVIA ARENAS 59,622 54.45%
JOHNNY KHAMIS 49,884 45.55%
Total Votes 109,506
Precincts Reported: 181 of 181 (100.00%)
County Supervisor, District 1 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
ROBERT "BOB" JONSEN 230,714 50.81%
KEVIN JENSEN 223,363 49.19%
Total Votes 454,077
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
Sheriff (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
DAN FURTADO 2,198 100.00%
Total Votes 2,198
Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
City of Campbell, District 3 Council Member (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 15 of 27
~
Candidate Party Total
ELLIOT SCOZZOLA 2,136 100.00%
Total Votes 2,136
Precincts Reported: 3 of 3 (100.00%)
City of Campbell, District 4 Council Member (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
ANNE COYNE BYBEE 2,342 100.00%
Total Votes 2,342
Precincts Reported: 3 of 3 (100.00%)
City of Campbell, District 5 Council Member (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
SHEILA MOHAN 8,335 17.21%
LIANGFANG "LIANG" CHAO 7,955 16.43%
J.R. FRUEN 7,701 15.90%
STEVEN SCHARF 7,257 14.98%
CLAUDIO BONO 6,576 13.58%
GOVIND TATACHARI 6,325 13.06%
YUKO SHIMA 2,277 4.70%
MOON KYU CHOE 2,004 4.14%
Total Votes 48,430
Precincts Reported: 19 of 19 (100.00%)
City of Cupertino Council Member (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
TOM CLINE 7,776 21.62%
CAROL MARQUES 7,528 20.93%
DION BRACCO 6,664 18.53%
JAN BERNSTEIN CHARGIN 5,718 15.90%
JOSEPH ROBINSON 4,449 12.37%
RONALD ROBINSON, JR. 3,837 10.67%
Total Votes 35,972
Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)
City of Gilroy Council Member (Vote for 3)
12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 16 of 27
Candidate Party Total
NEYSA FLIGOR 9,008 40.23%
PETE DAILEY 6,786 30.31%
ANITA ENANDER 6,482 28.95%
Total Votes 22,389
Total
ROGER HEYDER WRITE-IN 52 0.23%
Precincts Reported: 11 of 11 (100.00%)
City of Los Altos Council Member (Vote for 2)
Candidate Party Total
ROB MOORE 7,294 23.09%
MARY BADAME 6,801 21.53%
ROB RENNIE 6,136 19.42%
ROB STUMP 5,753 18.21%
MARGARET SMITH 4,151 13.14%
REZA TAVANA 1,456 4.61%
Total Votes 31,591
Precincts Reported: 14 of 14 (100.00%)
Town of Los Gatos Council Member (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
CARMEN MONTANO 5,658 34.45%
ANTHONY PHAN 4,166 25.37%
KARINA R. DOMINGUEZ 4,108 25.01%

VOLTAIRE SORIBEN
MONTEMAYOR 1,359 8.27%
OLA ROBERT HASSAN 637 3.88%
FRANCO PEREZ 495 3.01%
Total Votes 16,423
Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)
City of Milpitas Mayor (Vote for 1)
12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 17 of 27
Candidate Party Total
HON LIEN 7,840 28.40%
GARRY BARBADILLO 5,540 20.07%
MICHAEL TSAI 4,772 17.29%
DIPAK AWASTHI 4,001 14.49%
JULIETTE GOMEZ 2,101 7.61%
DEMETRESS MORRIS 1,832 6.64%
ISAAC STRINGER 1,521 5.51%
Total Votes 27,607
Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)
City of Milpitas Council Member (Vote for 2)
Candidate Party Total
MARK TURNER 6,672 42.78%
RICH CONSTANTINE 5,132 32.91%
LARRY CARR 3,792 24.31%
Total Votes 15,596
Precincts Reported: 20 of 20 (100.00%)
City of Morgan Hill Mayor (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
YVONNE MARTÍNEZ
BELTRÁN 2,222 60.48%
BRYAN SUTHERLAND 1,452 39.52%
Total Votes 3,674
Precincts Reported: 7 of 7 (100.00%)
City of Morgan Hill, District B Council Member (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
MARILYN LIBRERS 2,411 56.45%
JOHN K. MCKAY 1,860 43.55%
Total Votes 4,271
Precincts Reported: 4 of 4 (100.00%)
City of Morgan Hill, District D Council Member (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 18 of 27
Candidate Party Total
ELLEN KAMEI 15,347 27.46%
ALISON HICKS 15,040 26.91%
LUCAS RAMIREZ 14,725 26.34%
LI ZHANG 6,678 11.95%
JUSTIN COHEN 4,105 7.34%
Total Votes 55,895
Precincts Reported: 18 of 18 (100.00%)
City of Mountain View Council Member (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
VICKI VEENKER 14,292 22.55%
ED LAUING 13,052 20.59%
JULIE LYTHCOTT-HAIMS 12,036 18.99%
LISA FORSSELL 9,046 14.27%
DORIA SUMMA 7,785 12.28%
ALEX COMSA 3,728 5.88%
BRIAN HAMACHEK 3,447 5.44%
Total Votes 63,386
Precincts Reported: 24 of 24 (100.00%)
City of Palo Alto Council Member (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
MATT MAHAN 128,376 51.21%
CINDY CHÁVEZ 122,329 48.79%
Total Votes 250,705
Precincts Reported: 368 of 368 (100.00%)
City of San Jose Mayor (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
OMAR TORRES 11,657 65.62%
IRENE SMITH 6,107 34.38%
Total Votes 17,764
Precincts Reported: 30 of 30 (100.00%)
City of San Jose, District 3 Council Member (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 19 of 27
Candidate Party Total
PETER ORTIZ 9,074 54.82%
NORA CAMPOS 7,479 45.18%
Total Votes 16,553
Precincts Reported: 37 of 37 (100.00%)
City of San Jose, District 5 Council Member (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
BIEN DOAN 9,170 53.79%
MAYA ESPARZA 7,877 46.21%
Total Votes 17,047
Precincts Reported: 30 of 30 (100.00%)
City of San Jose, District 7 Council Member (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
LISA M. GILLMOR 14,838 51.34%
ANTHONY J. BECKER 14,062 48.66%
Total Votes 28,900
Precincts Reported: 36 of 36 (100.00%)
City of Santa Clara Mayor (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
RAJ CHAHAL 2,904 62.56%
LARRY MCCOLLOCH 1,738 37.44%
Total Votes 4,642
Precincts Reported: 8 of 8 (100.00%)
City of Santa Clara, District 2 Council Member (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
KAREN HARDY 2,824 64.28%
CHRISTIAN D. PELLECCHIA 1,569 35.72%
Total Votes 4,393
Precincts Reported: 5 of 5 (100.00%)
City of Santa Clara, District 3 Council Member (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 20 of 27
Candidate Party Total
YAN ZHAO 7,984 25.59%
BELAL AFTAB 7,174 23.00%
CHUCK PAGE 6,673 21.39%
BILL DALTON 5,909 18.94%
PRIYA RAJARAM SHASTRI 3,458 11.08%
Total Votes 31,198
Precincts Reported: 17 of 17 (100.00%)
City of Saratoga Council Member (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Total
MURALI SRINIVASAN 2,813 50.01%
JUSTIN WANG 2,812 49.99%
Total Votes 5,625
Precincts Reported: 5 of 5 (100.00%)
City of Sunnyvale, District 3 Council Member (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
RICHARD MEHLINGER 3,195 70.81%
SATYAM DAVÉ 1,317 29.19%
Total Votes 4,512
Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
City of Sunnyvale, District 5 Council Member (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
ANTONIO "TONY"
ESTREMERA 18,399 44.41%
DIEGO R. BARRAGAN 12,515 30.21%
CHUCK CANTRELL 10,512 25.38%
Total Votes 41,426
Precincts Reported: 92 of 92 (100.00%)
Santa Clara Valley Water, District 6 Director (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
REBECCA EISENBERG 46,156 54.93%
GARY KREMEN 37,866 45.07%
Total Votes 84,022
Precincts Reported: 121 of 121 (100.00%)
Santa Clara Valley Water, District 7 Director (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 21 of 27
Candidate Party Total
WAYNE LIN 613 37.54%
MEESHA REIISIEH 525 32.15%
BRANDON KWAN 495 30.31%
Total Votes 1,633
Precincts Reported: 1 of 1 (100.00%)
Rancho Rinconada Director (Vote for 2)
Candidate Party Total
Yes 407,714 76.12%
No 127,939 23.88%
Total Votes 535,653
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
State Proposition 1 - Constitutional Amendment - Right to Reproductive Freedom (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
No 355,886 67.70%
Yes 169,758 32.30%
Total Votes 525,644
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
State Proposition 26 - Constitutional Amendment and Statute - In-Person Gaming, Sports Wagering on Tribal Lands (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
No 438,950 82.71%
Yes 91,786 17.29%
Total Votes 530,736
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
State Proposition 27 - Constitutional Amendment and Statute – Online and Mobile Sports Wagering Outside Tribal Lands (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 351,830 66.42%
No 177,866 33.58%
Total Votes 529,696
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
State Proposition 28 - Initiative Statute – Funding for Arts and Music Education in Public Schools (Vote for 1)
12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 22 of 27
Candidate Party Total
No 348,125 66.34%
Yes 176,642 33.66%
Total Votes 524,767
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
State Proposition 29 - Initiative Statute - On-Site Licensed Medical Professional at Kidney Dialysis Clinics and Requirements (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
No 286,663 53.83%
Yes 245,916 46.17%
Total Votes 532,579
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
State Proposition 30 - Initiative Statute - Funding for Programs to Reduce Air Pollution and Prevent Wildfires (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
Yes 385,718 72.25%
No 148,137 27.75%
Total Votes 533,855
Precincts Reported: 754 of 754 (100.00%)
State Proposition 31 Referendum - 2020 Law Prohibits Retail Sale of Certain Flavored Tobacco Products (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
Yes 11,279 72.93%
No 4,187 27.07%
Total Votes 15,466
Precincts Reported: 20 of 20 (100.00%)
Measure A - City of Morgan Hill, Zoning Amendment (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 11,768 75.42%
No 3,836 24.58%
Total Votes 15,604
Precincts Reported: 20 of 20 (100.00%)
Measure B - City of Morgan Hill, General Plan Amendment (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 23 of 27
Candidate Party Total
Yes 10,357 76.72%
No 3,142 23.28%
Total Votes 13,499
Precincts Reported: 17 of 17 (100.00%)
Measure C - City of Saratoga, Term Limit Ordinance (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 9,885 72.00%
No 3,845 28.00%
Total Votes 13,730
Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)
Measure D - City of Gilroy, Charter Amendment (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Bonds - No 22 62.86%
Bonds - Yes 13 37.14%
Total Votes 35
Precincts Reported: 2 of 2 (100.00%)
Measure E - Patterson Joint Unified School District, School Bonds (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 12,786 78.68%
No 3,465 21.32%
Total Votes 16,251
Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)
Measure F - City of Milpitas, Term Limit Ordinance (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 24,643 84.19%
No 4,629 15.81%
Total Votes 29,272
Precincts Reported: 36 of 36 (100.00%)
Measure G - City of Santa Clara, No Tax Increase/Services Protection (Vote for 1)
12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 24 of 27
Candidate Party Total
Yes 17,329 59.50%
No 11,797 40.50%
Total Votes 29,126
Precincts Reported: 36 of 36 (100.00%)
Measure H - City of Santa Clara, Business License Update/Tax Equity (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
Yes 136,560 58.03%
No 98,766 41.97%
Total Votes 235,326
Precincts Reported: 368 of 368 (100.00%)
Measure I - City of San José, Charter Amendments (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 7,034 53.27%
No 6,170 46.73%
Total Votes 13,204
Precincts Reported: 14 of 14 (100.00%)
Measure J - Town of Los Gatos, Business License Taxes (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 17,311 67.00%
No 8,525 33.00%
Total Votes 25,836
Precincts Reported: 24 of 24 (100.00%)
Measure K - City of Palo Alto, Local Business Tax (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 19,711 77.72%
No 5,649 22.28%
Total Votes 25,360
Precincts Reported: 24 of 24 (100.00%)
Measure L - City of Palo Alto, Natural Gas Utility General Fund Transfer (Vote for 1)
12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 25 of 27
Candidate Party Total
Yes 344 69.08%
No 154 30.92%
Total Votes 498
Precincts Reported: 4 of 4 (100.00%)
Measure M - Loma Prieta Joint Union School District, Parcel Tax (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Bonds - Yes 78,303 66.63%
Bonds - No 39,215 33.37%
Total Votes 117,518
Precincts Reported: 210 of 210 (100.00%)
Measure N - East Side Union High School District, School Bonds (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Yes 51,895 75.94%
No 16,440 24.06%
Total Votes 68,335
Precincts Reported: 109 of 109 (100.00%)
Measure O - Campbell Union High School District, Parcel Tax (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Bonds - Yes 18,425 65.01%
Bonds - No 9,917 34.99%
Total Votes 28,342
Precincts Reported: 39 of 39 (100.00%)
Measure P - Oak Grove School District, School Bonds (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total
Bonds - Yes 10,104 63.10%
Bonds - No 5,909 36.90%
Total Votes 16,013
Precincts Reported: 20 of 20 (100.00%)
Measure R - Union School District, School Bonds (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 26 of 27
Candidate Party Total
Bonds - Yes 13,352 71.28%
Bonds - No 5,381 28.72%
Total Votes 18,733
Precincts Reported: 49 of 49 (100.00%)
Measure S - Alum Rock Union Elementary School District, School Bonds (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Total
Bonds - Yes 19,034 69.12%
Bonds - No 8,503 30.88%
Total Votes 27,537
Precincts Reported: 51 of 51 (100.00%)
Measure T - Campbell Union School District, School Bonds (Vote for 1) 12/7/2022 12:46:44 PMPage: 27 of 27
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)

ANTHONY
J. BECKER
Electionwide Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1172
Electionwide Vote by Mail 57474 28768 50.05 % 12890
Electionwide Total 57474 31361 54.57 % 14062
17th Congressional District Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1172 17th Congressional District Vote by Mail 57474 28768 50.05 % 12890 17th Congressional District Total 57474 31361 54.57 % 14062 10th Senatorial District Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1172 10th Senatorial District Vote by Mail 57474 28768 50.05 % 12890 10th Senatorial District Total 57474 31361 54.57 % 14062 15th Senatorial District Precinct 0 0
15th Senatorial District Vote by Mail 0 0
15th Senatorial District Total 0 0
25th Assembly District Precinct 0 0
25th Assembly District Vote by Mail 0 0
25th Assembly District Total 0 0
26th Assembly District Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1172
26th Assembly District Vote by Mail 57474 28768 50.05 % 12890 26th Assembly District Total 57474 31361 54.57 % 14062
State Board of Equalization #2 Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1172 State Board of Equalization #2 Vote by Mail 57474 28768 50.05 % 12890 State Board of Equalization #2 Total 57474 31361 54.57 % 14062 4th Supervisorial District Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1172 4th Supervisorial District Vote by Mail 57474 28768 50.05 % 12890 4th Supervisorial District Total 57474 31361 54.57 % 14062 City of Santa Clara Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1172
City of Santa Clara Vote by Mail 57474 28768 50.05 % 12890 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
1 City of Santa Clara Mayor
LISA M.

GILLMOR
1163
13675
14838
1163
13675
14838
1163
13675
14838
1163
13675
14838
1163
13675
14838
1163
13675
14838
1163
13675
Printed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:59 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:58 PM Page 89 of 123 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
City of Santa Clara Total 57474 31361 54.57 % 14062
Total - Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1172
Total - Vote by Mail 57474 28768 50.05 % 12890
Contest Total 57474 31361 54.57 % 14062
1163
13675
14838
14838
Printed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:59 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:58 PM Page 89 of 123 Registered
Voters
Voters Cast

ANTHONY
J. BECKER
0009001 Precinct 1820 88 29
0009001 Vote by Mail 1820 868 366
0009001 Total 1820 956 395
0009002 Precinct 2760 144 58
0009002 Vote by Mail 2760 1137 511
0009002 Total 2760 1281 569
0009009 Precinct 2718 173 76
0009009 Vote by Mail 2718 1267 507
0009009 Total 2718 1440 583
0009017 Precinct 1466 86 35
0009017 Vote by Mail 1466 631 251
0009017 Total 1466 717 286
0009051 Precinct 51 1 1
0009051 Vote by Mail 51 8 4
0009051 Total 51 9 5
0009052 Precinct 2606 103 58
0009052 Vote by Mail 2606 1232 532
0009052 Total 2606 1335 590
0009059 Precinct 610 29 10
0009059 Vote by Mail 610 272 137
0009059 Total 610 301 147
0009062 Precinct 926 32 12
0009062 Vote by Mail 926 486 174
0009062 Total 926 518 186
0009064 Precinct 807 20 10
0009064 Vote by Mail 807 458 205
0009064 Total 807 478 215
0009065 Precinct 2582 111 62
0009065 Vote by Mail 2582 1225 604
0009065 Total 2582 1336 666
0009071 Precinct 2122 118 62
0009071 Vote by Mail 2122 930 462
0009071 Total 2122 1048 524
0009078 Precinct 0 0
0009078 Vote by Mail 0 0
0009078 Total 0 0
0009101 Precinct 2427 95 47
0009101 Vote by Mail 2427 1152 478
0009101 Total 2427 1247 525
0009103 Precinct 2059 76 36
0009103 Vote by Mail 2059 986 482
0009103 Total 2059 1062 518
0009107 Precinct 1731 71 39
0009107 Vote by Mail 1731 937 431

51.58 % 454

4.10 % 28

54.13 % 439

51.38 % 621

3.69 % 36

47.89 % 418

3.91 % 38

47.47 % 583

49.39 % 450

51.74 % 567

5.56 % 48

43.83 % 402

59.23 % 233

4.30 % 36

47.44 % 531

55.94 % 286

2.48 % 9

56.75 % 224

49.34 % 125

3.46 % 18

52.48 % 268

51.23 % 635

4.75 % 14

44.59 % 111

17.65 % 3

3.95 % 34

47.28 % 601

48.91 % 354

1.96 %

15.69 % 3

52.98 % 723

5.87 % 44

43.04 % 310

46.41 % 606

6.36 % 78

46.62 % 645

52.53 % 471

5.22 % 63

41.20 % 543
Turnout (%)
LISA M.

GILLMOR

4.84 % 47

47.69 % 424
Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
1 City of Santa Clara Mayor
Printed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Page 89 of 123 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
0009107 Total 1731 1008 470
0009109 Precinct 1834 80 47
0009109 Vote by Mail 1834 882 417
0009109 Total 1834 962 464
0009116 Precinct 1093 41 25
0009116 Vote by Mail 1093 545 242
0009116 Total 1093 586 267
0009150 Precinct 1871 82 44
0009150 Vote by Mail 1871 864 404
0009150 Total 1871 946 448
0009152 Precinct 2092 79 39
0009152 Vote by Mail 2092 999 489
0009152 Total 2092 1078 528
0009154 Precinct 1085 43 22
0009154 Vote by Mail 1085 578 251
0009154 Total 1085 621 273
0009157 Precinct 1561 82 30
0009157 Vote by Mail 1561 661 332
0009157 Total 1561 743 362
0009161 Precinct 2152 79 33
0009161 Vote by Mail 2152 1211 495
0009161 Total 2152 1290 528
0009163 Precinct 1354 40 15
0009163 Vote by Mail 1354 800 381
0009163 Total 1354 840 396
0009203 Precinct 1689 72 20
0009203 Vote by Mail 1689 951 421
0009203 Total 1689 1023 441
0009208 Precinct 1847 88 46
0009208 Vote by Mail 1847 967 464
0009208 Total 1847 1055 510
0009209 Precinct 340 46 26
0009209 Vote by Mail 340 137 64
0009209 Total 340 183 90
0009210 Precinct 2065 91 33
0009210 Vote by Mail 2065 1115 527
0009210 Total 2065 1206 560
0009219 Precinct 164 8 4
0009219 Vote by Mail 164 72 24
0009219 Total 164 80 28
0009221 Precinct 2161 119 45
0009221 Vote by Mail 2161 1080 509
0009221 Total 2161 1199 554
0009250 Precinct 2787 119 50
0009250 Vote by Mail 2787 1591 760
0009250 Total 2787 1710 810
0009254 Precinct 892 43 14
0009254 Vote by Mail 892 564 244

61.36 % 778

4.82 % 25

63.23 % 288

55.48 % 562

4.27 % 57

57.09 % 721

48.78 % 46

5.51 % 59

49.98 % 503

58.40 % 562

4.88 % 4

43.90 % 42

53.82 % 81

4.41 % 52

54.00 % 510

57.12 % 457

13.53 % 16

40.29 % 65

60.57 % 497

4.76 % 30

52.36 % 427

62.04 % 390

4.26 % 46

56.31 % 451

59.94 % 674

2.95 % 22

59.08 % 368

47.60 % 324

3.67 % 36

56.27 % 638

57.24 % 304

5.25 % 42

42.34 % 282

51.53 % 458

3.96 % 17

53.27 % 287

50.56 % 414

3.78 % 29

47.75 % 429

53.61 % 278

4.38 % 32

46.18 % 382

52.45 % 409

3.75 % 14

49.86 % 264

58.23 % 467

4.36 % 25

48.09 % 384
Printed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Page 89 of 123 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
0009254 Total 892 607 258
0009258 Precinct 1787 102 47
0009258 Vote by Mail 1787 942 367
0009258 Total 1787 1044 414
0009264 Precinct 2496 91 45
0009264 Vote by Mail 2496 1393 572
0009264 Total 2496 1484 617
0009268 Precinct 1522 74 22
0009268 Vote by Mail 1522 834 315
0009268 Total 1522 908 337
0009275 Precinct 1193 46 22
0009275 Vote by Mail 1193 563 259
0009275 Total 1193 609 281
0009279 Precinct 804 21 8
0009279 Vote by Mail 804 430 209
0009279 Total 804 451 217
Total - Precinct 57474 2593 1172
Total - Vote by Mail 57474 28768 12890
Contest Total 57474 31361 14062

50.05 % 13675

54.57 % 14838

56.09 % 205

4.51 % 1163

51.05 % 296

2.61 % 13

53.48 % 192

59.66 % 511

3.86 % 19

47.19 % 277

59.46 % 733

4.86 % 46

54.80 % 465

58.42 % 551

3.65 % 39

55.81 % 694

68.05 % 313

5.71 % 47

52.71 % 504
Printed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Page 89 of 123 Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
RAJ
CHAHAL
Electionwide Precinct 9704 414 4.27 % 205
Electionwide Vote by Mail 9704 4611 47.52 % 2699
Electionwide Total 9704 5025 51.78 % 2904
17th Congressional District Precinct 9704 414 4.27 % 205 17th Congressional District Vote by Mail 9704 4611 47.52 % 2699 17th Congressional District Total 9704 5025 51.78 % 2904 10th Senatorial District Precinct 9704 414 4.27 % 205
10th Senatorial District Vote by Mail 9704 4611 47.52 % 2699 10th Senatorial District Total 9704 5025 51.78 % 2904
15th Senatorial District Precinct 0 0
15th Senatorial District Vote by Mail 0 0
15th Senatorial District Total 0 0
25th Assembly District Precinct 0 0
25th Assembly District Vote by Mail 0 0
25th Assembly District Total 0 0
26th Assembly District Precinct 9704 414 4.27 % 205
26th Assembly District Vote by Mail 9704 4611 47.52 % 2699 26th Assembly District Total 9704 5025 51.78 % 2904
State Board of Equalization #2 Precinct 9704 414 4.27 % 205 State Board of Equalization #2 Vote by Mail 9704 4611 47.52 % 2699 State Board of Equalization #2 Total 9704 5025 51.78 % 2904 4th Supervisorial District Precinct 9704 414 4.27 % 205 4th Supervisorial District Vote by Mail 9704 4611 47.52 % 2699 4th Supervisorial District Total 9704 5025 51.78 % 2904 City of Santa Clara Precinct 9704 414 4.27 % 205
City of Santa Clara Vote by Mail 9704 4611 47.52 % 2699 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
1 City of Santa Clara, District 2
Council Member
LARRY

MCCOLLO
CH
163
1575
1738
163
1575
1738
163
1575
1738
163
1575
1738
163
1575
1738
163
1575
1738
163
1575
Printed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:59 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:58 PM Page 90 of 123 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
City of Santa Clara Total 9704 5025 51.78 % 2904
Total - Precinct 9704 414 4.27 % 205
Total - Vote by Mail 9704 4611 47.52 % 2699
Contest Total 9704 5025 51.78 % 2904
163
1575
1738
1738
Printed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:59 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:58 PM Page 90 of 123 Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
RAJ
CHAHAL
0009051 Precinct 51 1 1
0009051 Vote by Mail 51 8 3
0009051 Total 51 9 4
0009052 Precinct 2606 103 39
0009052 Vote by Mail 2606 1232 609
0009052 Total 2606 1335 648
0009059 Precinct 610 29 7
0009059 Vote by Mail 610 272 155
0009059 Total 610 301 162
0009062 Precinct 926 32 16
0009062 Vote by Mail 926 486 293
0009062 Total 926 518 309
0009064 Precinct 807 20 11
0009064 Vote by Mail 807 458 245
0009064 Total 807 478 256
0009065 Precinct 2582 111 61
0009065 Vote by Mail 2582 1225 820
0009065 Total 2582 1336 881
0009071 Precinct 2122 118 70
0009071 Vote by Mail 2122 930 574
0009071 Total 2122 1048 644
0009078 Precinct 0 0
0009078 Vote by Mail 0 0
0009078 Total 0 0
Total - Precinct 9704 414 205
Total - Vote by Mail 9704 4611 2699
Contest Total 9704 5025 2904

47.52 % 1575

51.78 % 1738

4.27 % 163

49.39 % 327

51.74 % 351

5.56 % 38

43.83 % 289

59.23 % 189

4.30 % 36

47.44 % 315

55.94 % 174

2.48 % 8

56.75 % 181

49.34 % 108

3.46 % 15

52.48 % 159

51.23 % 584

4.75 % 15

44.59 % 93

17.65 % 5

3.95 % 51

47.28 % 533
Turnout (%)
LARRY

MCCOLLO
CH

1.96 %

15.69 % 5
Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
1 City of Santa Clara, District 2 Council Member
Printed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Page 90 of 123 Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
CHRISTIAN D.

PELLECCHIA
Electionwide Precinct 9144 363 3.97 % 146
Electionwide Vote by Mail 9144 4502 49.23 % 1423
Electionwide Total 9144 4865 53.20 % 1569
17th Congressional District Precinct 9144 363 3.97 % 146 17th Congressional District Vote by Mail 9144 4502 49.23 % 1423 17th Congressional District Total 9144 4865 53.20 % 1569 10th Senatorial District Precinct 9144 363 3.97 % 146
10th Senatorial District Vote by Mail 9144 4502 49.23 % 1423 10th Senatorial District Total 9144 4865 53.20 % 1569
26th Assembly District Precinct 9144 363 3.97 % 146
26th Assembly District Vote by Mail 9144 4502 49.23 % 1423 26th Assembly District Total 9144 4865 53.20 % 1569
State Board of Equalization #2 Precinct 9144 363 3.97 % 146 State Board of Equalization #2 Vote by Mail 9144 4502 49.23 % 1423 State Board of Equalization #2 Total 9144 4865 53.20 % 1569 4th Supervisorial District Precinct 9144 363 3.97 % 146 4th Supervisorial District Vote by Mail 9144 4502 49.23 % 1423 4th Supervisorial District Total 9144 4865 53.20 % 1569 City of Santa Clara Precinct 9144 363 3.97 % 146
City of Santa Clara Vote by Mail 9144 4502 49.23 % 1423 City of Santa Clara Total 9144 4865 53.20 % 1569
Total - Precinct 9144 363 3.97 % 146
Total - Vote by Mail 9144 4502 49.23 % 1423
Contest Total 9144 4865 53.20 % 1569
Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
1 City of Santa Clara, District 3
Council Member
KAREN
HARDY
172
2652
2824
172
2652
2824
172
2652
2824
172
2652
2824
172
2652
2824
172
2652
2824
172
2652
2824
172
2652
2824
Printed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:59 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:58 PM Page 91 of 123 Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
CHRISTIAN D.

PELLECCHIA
0009101 Precinct 2427 95 38
0009101 Vote by Mail 2427 1152 359
0009101 Total 2427 1247 397
0009103 Precinct 2059 76 34
0009103 Vote by Mail 2059 986 271
0009103 Total 2059 1062 305
0009107 Precinct 1731 71 20
0009107 Vote by Mail 1731 937 313
0009107 Total 1731 1008 333
0009109 Precinct 1834 80 34
0009109 Vote by Mail 1834 882 268
0009109 Total 1834 962 302
0009116 Precinct 1093 41 20
0009116 Vote by Mail 1093 545 212
0009116 Total 1093 586 232
Total - Precinct 9144 363 146
Total - Vote by Mail 9144 4502 1423
Contest Total 9144 4865 1569

49.23 % 2652

53.20 % 2824

53.61 % 316

3.97 % 172

52.45 % 554

3.75 % 17

49.86 % 299

58.23 % 589

4.36 % 34

48.09 % 520

51.58 % 642

4.10 % 42

54.13 % 547

51.38 % 723

3.69 % 36

47.89 % 606
Turnout (%)
KAREN
HARDY

3.91 % 43

47.47 % 680
Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
1 City of Santa Clara, District 3 Council Member
Printed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Page 91 of 123 County of Santa Clara
Registrar of Voters

1555 Berger Drive, Bldg. 2
San Jose, CA 95112
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 611360, San Jose, CA 95161-1360 (408) 299-VOTE (8683) 866-430-VOTE (8683) FAX: (408) 998-7314 www.sccvote.org

Board of Supervisors: Mike Wasserman, Cindy Chavez, Otto Lee , Susan Ellenberg , S. Joseph Simitian County Executive: Jeffrey V. Smith

December 8, 2022 Via email: [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

Mr. Hosam Haggag
Ms. Nora Pimentel
Ms. Deon Sailes
City of Santa Clara
1500 Warburton Ave
Santa Clara, CA 95050

RE: November 8, 2022 General Election Certification of Election Results for Measures G and H

Dear Mr. Haggag, et. al.:

Enclosed are the Certificate(s) of Election Results, Official Results and Statement of Votes for the contest(s) in your jurisdiction.

Pursuant to Elections Code Section 15400, the Governing Board should accept the Statement of Votes and Certificate(s) of Election Results and declare the totals to be the final results of the election.

Please feel free to contact me at 408- 282-3041 should you have questions or need anything further.

Sincerely,

Bren Lehr, Election Division Coordinator
Registrar of Voters
Candidate Services Division

Enclosures

CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION RESULTS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA )
I, Shannon Bushey, Registrar of Voters of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, hereby declare:

1. A General Election was held in the County of Santa Clara, in the City of Santa Clara, on November 8, 2022 for the purpose of submitting the following measure to the voters:

G
City of Santa Clara No Tax Increase/ Services Protection Measure. To protect essential services without raising taxes, such as 9-1-1 response; police patrols, fire protection; street/storm drain repair, and maintaining reliable local utility service; shall Section 1320 of the Charter continuing the annual budget transfer of funds from City utilities to the general fund at 5% of gross receipts until ended by voters, generating approximately $30,000,000 annually, with
independent audits, all funds local, be reaffirmed/adopted?

2. The official canvass of the returns of the election was conducted by the Office of the Registrar of Voters in accordance with the appropriate provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California.

3. The Statement of Votes Cast, now on file at my office, shows the whole number of votes cast for Measure G in each of the precincts and the total shown is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and Official Seal this 8th day of December, 2022. ers

CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION RESULTS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA )
I, Shannon Bushey, Registrar of Voters of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, hereby declare:

1. A General Election was held in the County of Santa Clara, in the City of Santa Clara, on November 8, 2022 for the purpose of submitting the following measure to the voters:

CITY OF SANTA CLARA BUSINESS LICENSE UPDATE/
TAX EQUITY MEASURE To protect Santa Clara's financial
stability and maintain essential services such as 911
emergency/public safety/crime reduction services, safe/clean public areas, pothole repair, parks/libraries, shall an ordinance to increase Santa Clara's 1992 business license tax on businesses to $45 per employee and on landlords to $15 per rental unit, generating approximately $6,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, with independent financial audits, all funds staying local, be adopted?

3. The Statement of Votes Cast, now on file at my office, shows the whole number of votes cast for Measure H in each of the precincts and the total shown is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and Official Seal this 8th day of December, 2022.

51.53 % 166

4.10 % 20

54.42 % 138

51.30 % 184

3.69 % 11

47.84 % 155

3.91 % 24

47.38 % 160

49.53 % 180

51.70 % 171

5.56 % 30

43.97 % 150

59.23 % 89

4.30 % 25

47.41 % 146

56.05 % 71

2.48 % 10

56.75 % 79

49.67 % 39

3.46 % 9

52.59 % 62

51.27 % 220

4.75 % 4

44.92 % 35

15.69 % 3

3.95 % 24

47.31 % 196

48.77 % 77

1.96 %

13.73 % 3

52.94 % 201

5.87 % 16

42.91 % 61

46.38 % 184

6.36 % 29

46.58 % 172

52.58 % 127

5.22 % 26

41.16 % 158
Turnout (%)
No

4.84 % 14

47.75 % 113
Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
1 Measure G - City of Santa Clara, No Tax Increase/Services Protection Printed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Page 111 of 123 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
0009107 Total 1731 1013 789
0009109 Precinct 1834 80 54
0009109 Vote by Mail 1834 883 704
0009109 Total 1834 963 758
0009116 Precinct 1093 41 27
0009116 Vote by Mail 1093 545 427
0009116 Total 1093 586 454
0009150 Precinct 1871 82 61
0009150 Vote by Mail 1871 866 679
0009150 Total 1871 948 740
0009152 Precinct 2092 79 53
0009152 Vote by Mail 2092 999 785
0009152 Total 2092 1078 838
0009154 Precinct 1085 43 31
0009154 Vote by Mail 1085 579 461
0009154 Total 1085 622 492
0009157 Precinct 1561 82 55
0009157 Vote by Mail 1561 662 548
0009157 Total 1561 744 603
0009161 Precinct 2152 79 57
0009161 Vote by Mail 2152 1212 997
0009161 Total 2152 1291 1054
0009163 Precinct 1354 40 23
0009163 Vote by Mail 1354 800 634
0009163 Total 1354 840 657
0009203 Precinct 1689 72 47
0009203 Vote by Mail 1689 950 731
0009203 Total 1689 1022 778
0009208 Precinct 1847 88 62
0009208 Vote by Mail 1847 970 763
0009208 Total 1847 1058 825
0009209 Precinct 340 46 34
0009209 Vote by Mail 340 138 114
0009209 Total 340 184 148
0009210 Precinct 2065 91 55
0009210 Vote by Mail 2065 1119 862
0009210 Total 2065 1210 917
0009219 Precinct 164 8 5
0009219 Vote by Mail 164 72 49
0009219 Total 164 80 54
0009221 Precinct 2161 119 81
0009221 Vote by Mail 2161 1080 880
0009221 Total 2161 1199 961
0009250 Precinct 2787 119 74
0009250 Vote by Mail 2787 1594 1230
0009250 Total 2787 1713 1304
0009254 Precinct 892 43 27
0009254 Vote by Mail 892 565 441

61.46 % 283

4.82 % 13

63.34 % 77

55.48 % 147

4.27 % 35

57.19 % 248

48.78 % 14

5.51 % 24

49.98 % 123

58.60 % 220

4.88 % 3

43.90 % 11

54.12 % 18

4.41 % 30

54.19 % 190

57.28 % 149

13.53 % 6

40.59 % 12

60.51 % 182

4.76 % 22

52.52 % 127

62.04 % 118

4.26 % 22

56.25 % 160

59.99 % 173

2.95 % 17

59.08 % 101

47.66 % 102

3.67 % 17

56.32 % 156

57.33 % 103

5.25 % 21

42.41 % 81

51.53 % 168

3.96 % 9

53.36 % 94

50.67 % 150

3.78 % 20

47.75 % 148

53.61 % 97

4.38 % 17

46.29 % 133

52.51 % 138

3.75 % 9

49.86 % 88

58.52 % 158

4.36 % 19

48.15 % 119
Printed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Page 111 of 123 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
0009254 Total 892 608 468
0009258 Precinct 1787 102 75
0009258 Vote by Mail 1787 946 766
0009258 Total 1787 1048 841
0009264 Precinct 2496 91 64
0009264 Vote by Mail 2496 1397 1132
0009264 Total 2496 1488 1196
0009268 Precinct 1522 74 51
0009268 Vote by Mail 1522 834 670
0009268 Total 1522 908 721
0009275 Precinct 1193 46 38
0009275 Vote by Mail 1193 563 465
0009275 Total 1193 609 503
0009279 Precinct 804 21 18
0009279 Vote by Mail 804 430 344
0009279 Total 804 451 362
Total - Precinct 57474 2593 1825
Total - Vote by Mail 57474 28797 22818
Contest Total 57474 31390 24643

50.10 % 4033

54.62 % 4629

56.09 % 57

4.51 % 596

51.05 % 75

2.61 % 2

53.48 % 55

59.66 % 134

3.86 % 6

47.19 % 69

59.62 % 197

4.86 % 20

54.80 % 114

58.65 % 144

3.65 % 22

55.97 % 175

68.16 % 90

5.71 % 20

52.94 % 124
Printed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Page 111 of 123 Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Yes
Electionwide Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1825
Electionwide Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 22818
Electionwide Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 24643
17th Congressional District Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1825 17th Congressional District Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 22818 17th Congressional District Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 24643 10th Senatorial District Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1825 10th Senatorial District Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 22818 10th Senatorial District Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 24643 15th Senatorial District Precinct 0 0
15th Senatorial District Vote by Mail 0 0
15th Senatorial District Total 0 0
25th Assembly District Precinct 0 0
25th Assembly District Vote by Mail 0 0
25th Assembly District Total 0 0
26th Assembly District Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1825
26th Assembly District Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 22818 26th Assembly District Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 24643
State Board of Equalization #2 Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1825 State Board of Equalization #2 Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 22818 State Board of Equalization #2 Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 24643 4th Supervisorial District Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1825 4th Supervisorial District Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 22818 4th Supervisorial District Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 24643 City of Santa Clara Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1825
City of Santa Clara Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 22818 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
1 Measure G - City of Santa Clara, No
Tax Increase/Services Protection
No
596
4033
4629
596
4033
4629
596
4033
4629
596
4033
4629
596
4033
4629
596
4033
4629
596
4033
Printed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:59 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:58 PM Page 111 of 123 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
City of Santa Clara Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 24643
Total - Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1825
Total - Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 22818
Contest Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 24643
596
4033
4629
4629
Printed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:59 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:58 PM Page 111 of 123 Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Yes
0009001 Precinct 1820 88 45
0009001 Vote by Mail 1820 869 485
0009001 Total 1820 957 530
0009002 Precinct 2760 144 72
0009002 Vote by Mail 2760 1136 594
0009002 Total 2760 1280 666
0009009 Precinct 2718 173 87
0009009 Vote by Mail 2718 1266 738
0009009 Total 2718 1439 825
0009017 Precinct 1466 86 47
0009017 Vote by Mail 1466 629 368
0009017 Total 1466 715 415
0009051 Precinct 51 1 1
0009051 Vote by Mail 51 7 1
0009051 Total 51 8 2
0009052 Precinct 2606 103 49
0009052 Vote by Mail 2606 1233 621
0009052 Total 2606 1336 670
0009059 Precinct 610 29 16
0009059 Vote by Mail 610 274 153
0009059 Total 610 303 169
0009062 Precinct 926 32 12
0009062 Vote by Mail 926 487 272
0009062 Total 926 519 284
0009064 Precinct 807 20 10
0009064 Vote by Mail 807 458 255
0009064 Total 807 478 265
0009065 Precinct 2582 111 49
0009065 Vote by Mail 2582 1224 718
0009065 Total 2582 1335 767
0009071 Precinct 2122 118 56
0009071 Vote by Mail 2122 933 557
0009071 Total 2122 1051 613
0009078 Precinct 0 0
0009078 Vote by Mail 0 0
0009078 Total 0 0
0009101 Precinct 2427 95 39
0009101 Vote by Mail 2427 1150 697
0009101 Total 2427 1245 736
0009103 Precinct 2059 76 37
0009103 Vote by Mail 2059 985 546
0009103 Total 2059 1061 583
0009107 Precinct 1731 71 35
0009107 Vote by Mail 1731 942 550

51.53 % 381

4.10 % 30

54.42 % 329

51.30 % 429

3.69 % 33

47.84 % 348

3.91 % 49

47.38 % 380

49.53 % 362

51.70 % 452

5.56 % 55

43.97 % 307

59.23 % 183

4.30 % 49

47.41 % 403

56.05 % 195

2.48 % 10

56.75 % 173

49.67 % 101

3.46 % 18

52.59 % 177

51.27 % 587

4.75 % 10

44.92 % 91

15.69 % 6

3.95 % 48

47.31 % 539

48.77 % 244

1.96 %

13.73 % 6

52.94 % 517

5.87 % 34

42.91 % 210

46.38 % 506

6.36 % 76

46.58 % 441

52.58 % 356

5.22 % 58

41.16 % 448
Turnout (%)
No

4.84 % 36

47.75 % 320
Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
1 Measure H - City of Santa Clara, Business License Update/Tax Equity Printed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Page 112 of 123 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
0009107 Total 1731 1013 585
0009109 Precinct 1834 80 30
0009109 Vote by Mail 1834 883 482
0009109 Total 1834 963 512
0009116 Precinct 1093 41 23
0009116 Vote by Mail 1093 545 300
0009116 Total 1093 586 323
0009150 Precinct 1871 82 39
0009150 Vote by Mail 1871 866 491
0009150 Total 1871 948 530
0009152 Precinct 2092 79 37
0009152 Vote by Mail 2092 999 548
0009152 Total 2092 1078 585
0009154 Precinct 1085 43 15
0009154 Vote by Mail 1085 579 316
0009154 Total 1085 622 331
0009157 Precinct 1561 82 36
0009157 Vote by Mail 1561 662 387
0009157 Total 1561 744 423
0009161 Precinct 2152 79 42
0009161 Vote by Mail 2152 1212 677
0009161 Total 2152 1291 719
0009163 Precinct 1354 40 16
0009163 Vote by Mail 1354 800 466
0009163 Total 1354 840 482
0009203 Precinct 1689 72 24
0009203 Vote by Mail 1689 950 522
0009203 Total 1689 1022 546
0009208 Precinct 1847 88 43
0009208 Vote by Mail 1847 970 539
0009208 Total 1847 1058 582
0009209 Precinct 340 46 28
0009209 Vote by Mail 340 138 83
0009209 Total 340 184 111
0009210 Precinct 2065 91 32
0009210 Vote by Mail 2065 1119 600
0009210 Total 2065 1210 632
0009219 Precinct 164 8 4
0009219 Vote by Mail 164 72 31
0009219 Total 164 80 35
0009221 Precinct 2161 119 50
0009221 Vote by Mail 2161 1080 623
0009221 Total 2161 1199 673
0009250 Precinct 2787 119 43
0009250 Vote by Mail 2787 1594 900
0009250 Total 2787 1713 943
0009254 Precinct 892 43 19
0009254 Vote by Mail 892 565 323

61.46 % 639

4.82 % 22

63.34 % 201

55.48 % 427

4.27 % 65

57.19 % 574

48.78 % 35

5.51 % 53

49.98 % 374

58.60 % 497

4.88 % 4

43.90 % 31

54.12 % 53

4.41 % 54

54.19 % 443

57.28 % 384

13.53 % 13

40.59 % 40

60.51 % 408

4.76 % 40

52.52 % 344

62.04 % 286

4.26 % 44

56.25 % 364

59.99 % 502

2.95 % 24

59.08 % 262

47.66 % 282

3.67 % 31

56.32 % 471

57.33 % 256

5.25 % 39

42.41 % 243

51.53 % 419

3.96 % 26

53.36 % 230

50.67 % 356

3.78 % 38

47.75 % 381

53.61 % 226

4.38 % 39

46.29 % 317

52.51 % 381

3.75 % 15

49.86 % 211

58.52 % 359

4.36 % 46

48.15 % 335
Printed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Page 112 of 123 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
0009254 Total 892 608 342
0009258 Precinct 1787 102 51
0009258 Vote by Mail 1787 946 506
0009258 Total 1787 1048 557
0009264 Precinct 2496 91 36
0009264 Vote by Mail 2496 1397 811
0009264 Total 2496 1488 847
0009268 Precinct 1522 74 31
0009268 Vote by Mail 1522 834 447
0009268 Total 1522 908 478
0009275 Precinct 1193 46 21
0009275 Vote by Mail 1193 563 313
0009275 Total 1193 609 334
0009279 Precinct 804 21 5
0009279 Vote by Mail 804 430 229
0009279 Total 804 451 234
Total - Precinct 57474 2593 1180
Total - Vote by Mail 57474 28797 16149
Contest Total 57474 31390 17329

50.10 % 10566

54.62 % 11797

56.09 % 180

4.51 % 1231

51.05 % 237

2.61 % 15

53.48 % 165

59.66 % 367

3.86 % 22

47.19 % 215

59.62 % 543

4.86 % 39

54.80 % 328

58.65 % 418

3.65 % 51

55.97 % 492

68.16 % 223

5.71 % 45

52.94 % 373
Printed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:14 PM Page 112 of 123 Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Yes
Electionwide Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1180
Electionwide Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 16149
Electionwide Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 17329
17th Congressional District Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1180 17th Congressional District Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 16149 17th Congressional District Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 17329 10th Senatorial District Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1180 10th Senatorial District Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 16149 10th Senatorial District Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 17329 15th Senatorial District Precinct 0 0
15th Senatorial District Vote by Mail 0 0
15th Senatorial District Total 0 0
25th Assembly District Precinct 0 0
25th Assembly District Vote by Mail 0 0
25th Assembly District Total 0 0
26th Assembly District Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1180
26th Assembly District Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 16149 26th Assembly District Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 17329
State Board of Equalization #2 Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1180 State Board of Equalization #2 Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 16149 State Board of Equalization #2 Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 17329 4th Supervisorial District Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1180 4th Supervisorial District Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 16149 4th Supervisorial District Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 17329 City of Santa Clara Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1180
City of Santa Clara Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 16149 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
1 Measure H - City of Santa Clara,
Business License Update/Tax Equity
No
1231
10566
11797
1231
10566
11797
1231
10566
11797
1231
10566
11797
1231
10566
11797
1231
10566
11797
1231
10566
Printed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:59 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:58 PM Page 112 of 123 Santa Clara
Santa Clara 2022 General
City of Santa Clara Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 17329
Total - Precinct 57474 2593 4.51 % 1180
Total - Vote by Mail 57474 28797 50.10 % 16149
Contest Total 57474 31390 54.62 % 17329
1231
10566
11797
11797
Printed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:59 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:58 PM Page 112 of 123

City Council and Authorities ConcurrentDecember 13, 2022

City Council and Authorities Concurrent
December 13, 2022