2. By email to [email protected] by 12 p.m. the day of the meeting. Those emails will be forwarded to the Council and will be uploaded to the City Council Agenda as supplemental meeting material. Emails received after the 12 p.m. cutoff time up through the end of the meeting will form part of the meeting record. Please identify the Agenda Item Number in the subject line of your email. NOTE: Please note eComments and Emails received as public comment will not be read aloud during the meeting.
Agendas, Staff Reports and some associated documents for City Council items may be viewed on the Internet at https://santaclara.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx
All public records relating to an open session item on this agenda, which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, that are distributed to a majority of the legislative body will be available for public inspection at the Office of the City Clerk at Sana Clara City Hall, 1500 Warburton Avenue, Santa Clara, CA 95050 at the same time that the public records are distributed or made available to the legislative body. Any draft contracts, ordinances and resolutions posted on the Internet site or distributed in advance of the Council meeting may not be the final documents approved by the City Council. For the final document, you many contact the Office of the City Clerk at (408) 615-2220 or [email protected]..
Overall Sentiment
Ying Lu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:56pm 04-25-23
Our family strongly oppose the Benton shelter project at Lawrence and Benton. It's a place dedicated for families in the neighborhood to celebrate holidays as our tradition. It's also not a suitable venue for shelter. It's not closed to public services and groceries.
Huan Li
Location:
Submitted At: 2:34pm 04-25-23
Oppose! We can't sacrifice our community's well-being by blindly building a homeless shelter. A lot of info in previous meetings was misleading. We must empathize with the children and prioritize their healthy growth. How can they have a healthy development in an environment filled with mentally ill and drug-abusing individuals? Deborah Dempsey
Location:
Submitted At: 2:17pm 04-25-23
I oppose the proposed interim housing site at Benton and Lawrence. "Special needs" individuals that have not received the training and support during the early years of development will require HUGE sums of money and supportive services to assimilate into society. The development in 3155 Stars and Stripes Drive is a better venue for interim housing.
Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:06pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose building a homeless facility at Benton!! Milena Brozyna
Location:
Submitted At: 11:34am 04-25-23
We believe a location further from schools, parks and residential areas will be better suited for the project Megan Katz
Location:
Submitted At: 8:27pm 04-24-23
The new proposal is horrible. It keeps no-screening procedures but plans to put innocent kids next to sex offenders and people with drug addiction, just in order to get a high score for funding. LufeMoves put kids in danger on purpose and ruin their entire life! Shame on LifeMoves! Yiming Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 8:10pm 04-24-23
I am a resident here in Santa Clara County. I STRONGLY OPPOSED to this action as it will pose tremendous risk to the kids here.
Sarah Foad
Location:
Submitted At: 7:50pm 04-24-23
I'm a healthcare worker at Stanford and resident of Santa Clara. I've witnessed the impact of homelessness on the health of our community. Research shows that access to housing is one of the most powerful social determinants of health. The combination of housing with comprehensive health support services is the most costeffective intervention, maximizing taxpayer dollars by reducing the number of emergency room visits, hospital stays, and ambulance rides. Vote yes on this proposal.
Aashi Verma
Location:
Submitted At: 7:33pm 04-24-23
I am in strong opposition of this homeless shelter because of the many safety issues it comes with.
Greg Dacosta
Location:
Submitted At: 5:07pm 04-24-23
Please allow all residents speak and have dialogue. Not in a manner that all questions are taken in one minute speech from each speaker and few answers are given. It has not be like Q&A session where people are allowed ask counter questions in response answer.
Please do not limit meeting time to 3 hours only
Sharanagoud Devaraddi
Location:
Submitted At: 4:57pm 04-24-23
I strongly opposed to build a homeless facility at Benton! Mingmin Zhu
Location:
Submitted At: 4:10pm 04-24-23
Strongly opposed to build a homeless facility at Benton!!! There are many daycares, schools in this area. Even the kids always play around this area. The non screen shelter can pose high risks to the children and families. Please protect the children!
PENG JIANG
Location:
Submitted At: 10:22am 04-24-23
Low barriar and non-screen shelter is not acceptable at all.
Ashish Verma
Location:
Submitted At: 4:24pm 04-23-23
I strongly oppose a low barrier entry shelter close to any residential neighborhood. At a minimum, the city should enforce background checks and screening so that anytime such an initiative is planned close to residences, the security of residents does not become an afterthought. It is heartbreaking to see our city and county officials ignore and criticize their own residents for being concerned around safety and security. No to this proposal.
Fei Luo
Location:
Submitted At: 3:06pm 04-23-23
I strongly opposed to build a homeless facility at Benton! Low barrier, non-screening homeless poses serious safety risk to the communities and schools around Benton. As a resident and parent of my kids who is studying in the near by school, I oppose the Benton project that deeply concerns my family! Benny Fong
Location:
Submitted At: 11:10am 04-23-23
I strongly oppose any shelter at Benton. This is absolutely the WRONG location for homeless shelter of any kind.
There are 11,000 school aged children attending the fifteen plus K-12 schools. It is absolutely irresponsible to place a homeless shelter in this location. Don't sacrifice our kids for your political agenda! There is Bella Vista shelter 1/2 mile away already. Why does the City of Santa Clara, with a population of only one hundred thousand, have to build so many homeless shelter?
Melissa Lee
Location:
Submitted At: 10:49am 04-23-23
Strong oppose! Low barrier, no screening, allowing occupants with drug addiction, criminal records, sex offenders Benton is a bustling community hub attracting 3,000+ families yearly Over 11k families are at risk; similar sites experienced a rise in police calls A second shelter opened 0.5 miles away
LifeMoves is poorly staffed, low success rate in permanent housing, and location far from public transit, grocery, and jobs
False data was presented, no integrity!
Politically motivated supporters.
Jaccard Pan
Location:
Submitted At: 10:47am 04-23-23
I strongly opposes the Benton Shelter Plan because LifeMoves has a very bad record of running homeless shelters in nearby cities. Do you know 74% of their clients are still homeless after existing LifeMoves' shelter, because they cannot get quality service from there? They don't even feel safe there. Do you know LifeMoves doubled the cost estimate of their existing shelter within a year of approval? The unreasonable cost overrun indicates LifeMoves are losing control of their project.
Jennifer Qiang
Location:
Submitted At: 8:39am 04-23-23
I'm Jennifer residing in Santa Clara with my family, I hold a firm stance against the construction of a homeless facility at Benton, primarily due to concerns for the safety of my children.
Agenda Item: eComments for NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code §54956 ("The Brown Act") and Section 708 of the Santa Clara City Charter, the majority of the City Council calls for a Special City Council Meeting, to commence and convene on April 25, 2023, at 5:00 p.m. for a Special Meeting to be held virtually and in the City Hall Council Chambers located in the East Wing of City Hall at 1500 Warburton Avenue, Santa Clara, California, to consider the following matter(s) and to potentially take action with respect to them.
Overall Sentiment
Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:07pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose building a homeless facility at Benton!! Beth Ross
Location:
Submitted At: 12:43pm 04-25-23
We Strongly oppose the proposed shelter at Benton.
Quote from the Packet: "Certain registered sex offenders would not be placed at the site WHILE children are living there".
Does that mean "registered sex offenders" would be placed in this proposed shelter if no more homeless family living there?
What about children living next door to this proposed shelter? Does that mean only homeless children matter for Homekey?
Since when "registered sex offenders" have higher priority than our children? Nisha Mehta
Location:
Submitted At: 11:42am 04-25-23
We Strongly oppose this for the safety of our children & Neghibourhood. We are very much concerned about this & surprised on city making such proposals. This is UNACCEPTABLE & we Stronly OPPOSE! _ Agenda Item: eComments for 5:00 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Overall Sentiment
Betty Wiseman
Location:
Submitted At: 3:51pm 04-25-23
Can someone clarify if the proposed site is Benton and Lawrence? The City Council Notice of Public Hearing states it is located at 2350 Benton Street, about two miles east of Benton/Lawrence.
Strong Oppose to any shelter in residential communities. .
Phil Zhao
Location:
Submitted At: 3:46pm 04-25-23
STRONGLY Oppose! Please vote "no".
Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:07pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose building a homeless facility at Benton!! Beth Ross
Location:
Submitted At: 12:56pm 04-25-23
We STRONLY OPPOSE this proposal.
There is no design detail in the Packet.
How many rooms in one unit? Is one unit only for one family? Can multi families live in one unit? How did you come up with total 120 people?
Please vote No to this proposal. We don't want to write a blank check to LifeMoves; their operating records are bad enough already.
Ashish Verma
Location:
Submitted At: 11:42am 04-23-23
Please vote "No" and listen to the vast majority of your tax paying residents. We are willing to work with you in finding solutions that are acceptable and help solve the homelessness issue. This location is a good fit for families with livelihood nearby who may be on the verge of being homeless and do not pose a risk. Please do not play with our lives by imposing folks with criminal background due to lack of screening. You actions would show whether you really care about our lives.
Agenda Item: eComments for Call to Order
Overall Sentiment
Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:09pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose building a homeless facility at Benton!! Brian West
Location:
Submitted At: 11:01pm 04-23-23
We strongly oppose to this proposed low barrier homeless shelter at Benton & Lawrence. Vote it down! Go find some other more suitable site. Benton at Lawrence is the WRONG location.
The Benton/Lawrence lot is our community land. Thousands of families utilize this lot for community activities every year.
Don't Take Away Our Land!
Agenda Item: eComments for Pledge of Allegiance and Statement of Values Overall Sentiment
Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:10pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose building a homeless facility at Benton!! Beth Ross
Location:
Submitted At: 1:12pm 04-25-23
Again quote from the Packet: "If at some point there were no unhoused households with children to place, the building would place single clients in dorm style "flex" units. What IS a "flex" unit? So all these housing for homeless family with children is just a façade to get approval. LifeMoves can do anything once it get to build the shelter; the operators have the power do any changes. We as citizens of this neighborhood has NONE. How sad would that be?
We Strongly OPPOSE this proposal.
Benny Fong
Location:
Submitted At: 10:10am 04-25-23
We OPPOSE the low-barrier interim housing proposed at Benton St Misinformation everywhere in LifeMove Packet doc.
7-11 is NOT a grocery store; it's a convivence store. Folks go to 7-11 to buy liquors and condoms.
So there is no easy access to grocery store. This is a desperate attempt to make the proposal look qualified.
This is just one example of misinformation. Please read pages 12 to 16 of the Packet doc.
Agenda Item: eComments for Roll Call
Overall Sentiment
BJ Huang
Location:
Submitted At: 2:14pm 04-25-23
We OPPOSE this proposal.
The homeless people who don't find permanent housing and who are at the end of their “interim” stay are going to be forced out of the shelter. They are going to congregate near the shelter site, thereby impacting the immediate neighborhood. It will only get worse as days goes by! This is not solving the homeless problem. It is just dumping the homeless, and issues that come with being homeless in our neighborhood. What is the County's plan to mitigate this problem?
Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:10pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose building a homeless facility at Benton!! Seth Steingraph
Location:
Submitted At: 11:59am 04-25-23
Please ask the people who support this proposal HOW CLOSE they live to this location. If they live very close and still support the project, then hats off to them. If, like me, they live a mile or more away, then take their comments with a grain of salt. It's very easy to claim the moral high ground when one is only minimally affected themselves; it's much harder when one has to actually deal with the consequences.
Bess Henderson
Location:
Submitted At: 11:54am 04-25-23
We OPPOSE the low-barrier interim housing proposed at Benton & Lawrence.
The City needs to do more community outreach before voting. The surrounding community needs to get notified correctly about this hearing. City Council Meeting Notice of Public Hearing put out confusing information.
Benton at Lawrence actual address is 3590 Benton Street, Not 2350 Benton as printed on the Notice.
Residents near Benton and Lawrence might not pay attention because they will think it's about 2350 Benton.
Benny Fong
Location:
Submitted At: 11:48am 04-23-23
I strongly oppose any shelter at Benton. This is absolutely the WRONG location for homeless shelter of any kind.
Agenda Item: eComments for PUBLIC HEARING/GENERAL BUSINESS Overall Sentiment
Niranjan Manjunath
Location:
Submitted At: 3:25pm 04-25-23
Strongly Oppose shelter project at Lawrence and Benton. The proposed development lacks adequate security measures, which could lead to an uptick in criminal activity and drug abuse in our area. Additionally, the development's proximity to nearby schools raises concerns about the safety of our children. We also believe that the proposed development would require a significant investment of taxpayer funds for infrastructure improvements, which we believe could be better utilized elsewhere.
Diane Harrison
Location:
Submitted At: 3:21pm 04-25-23
Forgot to add that the opposition ignored USPS regulations and put an unstamped & unaddressed flier in our mailbox, and probably a lot of others. The support side took care not to do that.
Ying Lu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:58pm 04-25-23
Our family strongly oppose the Benton shelter project at Lawrence and Benton. It's a place dedicated for families in the neighborhood to celebrate holidays as our tradition. It's also not a suitable venue for shelter. It's not closed to public services and groceries.
Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:10pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose building a homeless facility at Benton!! sergey gorbunov
Location:
Submitted At: 9:20am 04-25-23
I am writing to express my strong opposition about Benton proposal for a low barrier homeless shelter. The homeless shelter will bring to our neighborhood drugs, related crimes and vandalism Greg Dacosta
Location:
Submitted At: 5:10pm 04-24-23
Please allow 3 minutes to each attendee provide immediate answers to question and have dialogue. Please do not restrict people from asking counter questions in response to answers. Please make sure that zoom, Santa Clara/Sunnyvale residents who are close to this location are given priority and county does not bring a flock of supporters from outside
Benny Fong
Location:
Submitted At: 11:48am 04-23-23
I strongly oppose any shelter at Benton. This is absolutely the WRONG location for homeless shelter of any kind.
Agenda Item: eComments for 23-272 Consideration and Possible Actions on a Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on County-Owned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street, Including City Sponsorship and Partial Funding of Project Operations (CEQA: Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects)
Overall Sentiment
Kevin Chen
Location:
Submitted At: 4:43pm 04-25-23
I strongly disagree with the proposal as there are numerous daycare centers and schools located within a mile radius. Additionally, the transportation options are not convenient for the homeless population, and their potential presence in the area would create a safety concern for the children.
Daniel Ruan
Location:
Submitted At: 4:40pm 04-25-23
My family and I strongly oppose the proposal. The low barrier shelter will bring severe safety problems to nearby residents. There is no convenient public transportation nearby in this area. Overall, it's a very bad choice to build shelter in this location
Serge Filatov
Location:
Submitted At: 4:37pm 04-25-23
The community has voiced a large number of reasons for why the shelter should not be located in such a dense residential neighborhood, some of which are concerning. The City needs to find a different location.
Andy Pluemer
Location:
Submitted At: 4:33pm 04-25-23
I oppose the Benton/Lawrence project.
Vanessa Chen
Location:
Submitted At: 4:30pm 04-25-23
My husband and I live 10 mins walk from the proposed site. We strongly opposed building the shelter in the proposed location. Our concerns are safety of neighborhood and its financial burden on tax payer, not only in construction but also in maintaince.
Bharath Pandravada
Location:
Submitted At: 4:28pm 04-25-23
We live very close to the proposed site and I strongly oppose the Benton shelter project in Santa Clara. There are definitely better alternatives to help the homeless than building a shelter in this location. With so many schools around, it could have negative effects on safety for children and neighborhood as a whole.
Please take our concerns into account and reconsider this proposal.
Kautul Mehta
Location:
Submitted At: 4:26pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose due to the following reasons -
- safety concerns due to a low barrier to entry
- short term shelter instead of a longer term shelter catering to families - no committed funding putting burden on city of santa clara - close to 10+ parks and schools
- busy/unsafe intersection for homeless folks who are mentally ill K Rajesh Jagannath
Location:
Submitted At: 4:24pm 04-25-23
Dear Sir/ Madam,
I oppose the Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on County-Owned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street.
This project reduces the sense of security if the neighborhood - this project is in close proximity to schools, apartments and homes.
I oppose this project in the best interest of the community that will be impacted.
Bests,
K Rajesh Jagannath
Luyao Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 4:22pm 04-25-23
Our family live only one block away and we oppose this low barrier shelter. It's unacceptable to build another shelter within walking distance to primary school. It's hard to be a safety and nice community with two shelters so close.
CH Huang
Location:
Submitted At: 4:17pm 04-25-23
We live 3 blocks away & strongly oppose the proposed Benton location.
1. Safety for our children and seniors. This is a dense residential area with many schools and high foot traffic.
This project shouldn't be placed so close to the vulnerable.
2. With a 26% success for 3m placement, where are the homeless going to go after? Our streets &park.
3. Already witnessing an increase in property crime.
4. We want to help the homeless but NOT at the expense of safety of our family &community.
Bhargava krishnamurthy
Location:
Submitted At: 4:17pm 04-25-23
People who don't want Sunnyvale to be safe have proposed this project. So far, Sunnyvale was rated as the safest city in US.
Lisa C
Location:
Submitted At: 4:15pm 04-25-23
While I support the City's goal to build more housing for the homeless, I am opposed to the Benton-Lawrence site due to the location's inability to successfully serve the homeless. The Benton-Lawrence site is off a busy expressway designed more for people with cars making a quick stop. The proposed site is right across the street from a discount liquor store and the nearest public bus stop is 0.7 miles away (not a short walk) - increasing risk to safety-health for all. Find a better location.
Jamie Lin
Location:
Submitted At: 4:13pm 04-25-23
My family strongly oppose the proposal. The low barrier shelter will bring severe safety concerns to the closely located schools, houses, apartments, and parks. Also there is no good public transportation to support the commute for the people live in. It they walk around the streets without a good manner, it impacts the peace of the whole community. There is a shelter just 10 min walk away. No reason to built another one next to it. Please reconsider and put the efforts on the things worth it.
Jianmin Yue
Location:
Submitted At: 4:11pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose the shelter.
The shelter is not helping the homeless people who really want to change their life via finding jobs. Because there is no job opportunities nearby. There are high percentage homeless people with mental issues, they won't be back to job at all.
The shelter harm the community a lot. There are lots of schools within one mile. The homeless people with criminal history and drug issues will wandering around and put in danger of our kids.
Ashish Patel
Location:
Submitted At: 4:09pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose the proposal due to the following reasons:
1) Safety Concerns: There is no background check to screen out criminals and drug addicts 2) No committed/ear marked funding for policing
3) Financial burden on Santa Clara: The city lacks funding to sustain the huge burden after the homekey funding runs out (we the people would need to bear the brunt)
Aihua Lei
Location:
Submitted At: 4:07pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose this this plan! This land is for community event purpose, city and county can not just ignore its original purpose and force it into a homeless shelter ignoring community residential's benefit. There are a lot of problems of the project itself, LifeMoves has been failing in all recent homeless shelter projects, they are not reliable at all to run this project. There is a huge funding gap that city and country don't even have idea how to run this project for coming 3-5 years.
ruc kh
Location:
Submitted At: 4:06pm 04-25-23
A project like this one should not be in a residential neighborhood with so many schools surrounding it. This housing is not necessary as we already have one on Bella Vista. Drug abuse and crime are #1 concern and there has been no mention of how these will be addressed or controlled. If the city refuses to heed to tax payer's requests, we will be forced to move to safer neighborhoods where our voices are heard and expected.
Yang Jiao
Location:
Submitted At: 4:06pm 04-25-23
Our family strongly oppose to this proposal. We live very nearby and this site location is not suitable for building such temporary housing.
The density LifeMoves proposed is too high, with >90 rooms on a 1 acre lot. It raises concerns about the environmental impact and safety of housing so many people on such a small site.
Also it's located at a very busy intersection with lots of car traffics. It would be dangerous for homeless, especially with physical/mental issues, to walk around
Jessica Hu
Location:
Submitted At: 4:05pm 04-25-23
As a resident of Santa Clara city, I strongly opposed this project. First, it’s not an good position for people to live in. The proposed location is right beside the Lawrence expressway which is dangerous and full of noise.
Secondly, I worried about the safety of our children and seniors. The company Life Movers has never earned the trust from the community. I hope my voice is heard! Thanks! Elia Nino
Location:
Submitted At: 4:02pm 04-25-23
I've attended two of the sessions regarding this project and have questions I don't think have been addressed fully:
What is the enforcement of illegal activity prevention? How is "low barrier" entry defined? What are the guidelines? Are rehabiliation services included?
Why was there such a discrepancy between the # of schools presented? What's the plan for funding runs out in 3 years?
Lowered property values? There was an attempt to discredit the report by citing criticism of the analysis.
Yueming Sun
Location:
Submitted At: 4:01pm 04-25-23
We strongly oppose the shelter! The shelter accept homeless people with criminal history, such as sex offenders, mental issue. This put in danger of the kids and elderly in the community. It is a terrible location. There are many schools within one mile. And there is no public transportation nearby for the homeless to find a job. You should consider alternative locations such as industrial area. Wrong location. Please do not only care the homeless people, care our residents as well.
Ashlyn Ju
Location:
Submitted At: 4:01pm 04-25-23
LifeMoves is an unreliable partner to deliver success. It fails in all aspects: budget estimate, staff, service, execute policy, help homeless, manage neighborhood safety, and more.
Deepa Vaidhyanathan
Location:
Submitted At: 3:43pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose the proposal for this shelter as it is so close to so many schools and homes and safety is a big concern.
Betty Wiseman
Location:
Submitted At: 3:41pm 04-25-23
We live very close to the proposed site. We have daily walk in our neighborhood. With the hundreds of homeless expected to congregate near our home, we can't imagine to walk without a police escort. There is Bella Vista shelter already on El Camino Real 1/2 mile away. Why our city needs to build so many shelter? Strong NO to the proposed shelter
.
Mehrdad Aghvami
Location:
Submitted At: 3:36pm 04-25-23
Our family strongly oppose this project in this location. As we have previously raised many concerns such as safety, increased crime and drug use activities. Also, the "shelter" will not be able to deal with the people that need mental care of its residence that will spill over into the neighborhood. This will have a huge negative impact on all local businesses as well.
Vin Warerkar
Location:
Submitted At: 3:16pm 04-25-23
I oppose this proposal for reasons that include
1. Child Safety: increased risk due to close proximity to multiple toddler day care facilities and elementary schools_2. Public Safety: further deterioration of public safety in neighborhood as there is already an increase in theft and vandalism on the neighborhood
3 Low Entry Barrier Housing: lacks evidence that this helps the homeless overcome poverty, drug abuse, mental health and other causes of homelessness
Ying Lu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:59pm 04-25-23
We are resident of Santa Clara city. Our family strongly oppose the Benton shelter project at Lawrence and Benton. It's a place dedicated for families in the neighborhood to celebrate holidays as our tradition. It's also not a suitable venue for shelter. It's not closed to public services and groceries.
Aditi Chandra
Location:
Submitted At: 2:58pm 04-25-23
I live 2 blocks from the proposed shelter and I strongly oppose the project. My kids and in-laws regularly walk that route and I feel unsafe having drug addicts, sex offenders, and felony criminals in and around my kids and family.
Nitin Bahadur
Location:
Submitted At: 2:55pm 04-25-23
I oppose a low-barrier homeless shelter in a residential district surrounded by 10+ schools. By trying to do a righteous thing, the city is creating more problems for the society at large.
Amith Deshpande
Location:
Submitted At: 2:55pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose to this proposal. Wrong location for this purpose.
Tina Lao
Location:
Submitted At: 2:41pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose the homeless shelter in residential area. Please don’t attract more homeless close to school.
We must have better solutions than this. Please hear Santa Clara residents’ voice.
Steven Wu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:30pm 04-25-23
I am writing to express my STRONG OPPOSITION to the proposal of building a shelter place in our community.
This would have a negative impact on the safety and well-being of our community, especially for vulnerable populations such as children and the elderly. It could also have adverse effects on property values, local businesses, and tourism, which are crucial to our community's economic well-being.
Huan Li
Location:
Submitted At: 2:23pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose this proposal! There are better approaches to help homeless individuals than constructing a low barrier shelter in an inappropriate location. Please hear our voices and take our concerns into account! Bin Xue
Location:
Submitted At: 2:20pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose building the shelter at Benton, it’s too close to schools Brenda Earl
Location:
Submitted At: 2:18pm 04-25-23
As a resident of this community, I strongly oppose the construction of a low barrier homeless shelter in our community.
We do not welcome a low barrier (no background check) homeless shelter exist in our community with more than 10,000 children attending pre-school and elementary schools in our community. We need to make sure our community is safe.
We believe there are better locations other than our community to build the shelter.
Shilpa Bhat
Location:
Submitted At: 2:17pm 04-25-23
We strongly oppose to the Benton development. Pls cease project. It 1) Impacts Safety of residents
2) Safety of kids. Proximity to 10+schools & 7k+ school children (in 1.5 miles) 2022 Project HomeKey Report shared in Milpitas council meeting showed 3x crime increase Vs when the facility was a hotel.
Move shelter to a less residential area provide amenities/support to rehabilitate individuals. With our taxes tackle the root causes of homelessness through rehabilitation & address root cause Nis Naik
Location:
Submitted At: 2:11pm 04-25-23
Strongly oppose this project as a parent concerned about the safety of her young kids! Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:10pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose building a homeless facility at Benton!! Alex Wu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:08pm 04-25-23
As a resident of this community, I oppose the construction of a homeless shelter in our area. While I empathize with those experiencing homelessness and understand the need to provide support and assistance, I believe that building a shelter in our neighborhood would not be an effective solution. I worry about the potential negative consequences that a homeless shelter could bring, such as increased crime rates and decreased property values.
Vins Mittal
Location:
Submitted At: 2:08pm 04-25-23
Strongly Oppose.
People from all walks of life should be integrated in the mainstream to have access to basic needs such as food, shelter, clothing, etc. But, there has to be a process to do the same. To achieve such an objective, we can't have people with criminal background, substance abuse, etc. in a residential neighborhood with large number of schools in the vicinity!
Either the project's location should be changed or residents should be free of any criminal record / substance abuse.
Arun Sriraman
Location:
Submitted At: 2:08pm 04-25-23
I live in Sunnyvale less than half a mile from the proposed project location. I strongly oppose this proposal. A neighborhood with high density of residences, school and school age children is the worst possible choice for a low barrier housing project. Please consider a different non residential location.
Rui Diao
Location:
Submitted At: 2:05pm 04-25-23
Please read this report: https://www.mercurynews.com/2022/09/25/tiny-homes-and-homelessness-what-the-datashows/ I don't see any reason why this project would do better.
WW Wu
Location:
Submitted At: 1:53pm 04-25-23
Strongly oppose this project. This is a huge safety issue for our neighborhood.
Carrie Wu
Location:
Submitted At: 1:52pm 04-25-23
I live in Santa Clara with my family. And I strongly oppose building a homeless facility near Benton. It is extremely unsafe for families nearby.
Hongtao Cheng
Location:
Submitted At: 1:52pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose. As a concerned citizen, I am troubled by the lack of safe, affordable housing options for the homeless population in our community. Having spoken with some of the individuals who use our local homeless shelters, I have heard firsthand accounts of overcrowding, inadequate facilities, and limited access to basic necessities like food, clothing, and medical care. It is clear that the current situation is unacceptable and demands urgent attention.
Lucy Yin
Location:
Submitted At: 1:51pm 04-25-23
I STRONGLY OPPOSE to this proposal!!! This location is too close to lots of schools with young kids. Building a sheltering house here definitely increases the safety concern to the neighborhood! Shruti Sharma
Location:
Submitted At: 1:51pm 04-25-23
We cannot support the low-income housing proposal in our neighborhood due to concerns about increased crime rates and the waste of taxpayer money. The proposed development lacks adequate security measures, which could result in a higher crime rate in our area. Additionally, the development would require significant investment of taxpayer funds for infrastructure improvements, which we believe could be better utilized elsewhere.
Sess Ken
Location:
Submitted At: 1:47pm 04-25-23
STRONGLY oppose.
Danny Mass
Location:
Submitted At: 1:46pm 04-25-23
I'm strongly against the proposal as I have big concern about the potential safety impact to the community and the financial suspensibility of program. Please stop the project immediately from moving forward! Abby Ma
Location:
Submitted At: 1:40pm 04-25-23
I stronlgy oppose to setting up a shelter at Benson Street for a lot of reasons i can't even list out (mostly safety concerns, and potential very bad influence on the neighbourhood Please don't make decisions against the majority's will Chen Zhang
Location:
Submitted At: 1:37pm 04-25-23
Strongly opposite to building this shelter. A lot of schools near by. Very bad for those schools and kids.
Peggy Bu
Location:
Submitted At: 1:37pm 04-25-23
We OPPOSE the low-barrier interim housing proposed at Benton Street & Lawrence Expressway. There are many schools near location. We want a safe environment for our children!!! Kieky Cheng
Location:
Submitted At: 1:30pm 04-25-23
Without strict background check, this leads to a lot of safety concerns.
Ishani Bhatt
Location:
Submitted At: 1:20pm 04-25-23
Strongly oppose this project. This is a huge safety issue for our neighborhood.
Why can't we help homeless without ruining hardworking middle class people's neighborhood and lives.
Move it some other place,
Tom TH
Location:
Submitted At: 1:19pm 04-25-23
Strongly oppose it because
1 It’s Too close to multiple elementary schools
2 The serious lessons of deterioration of public safety surrounding the neighborhood after such shelter established in other locations
3 It won’t solve the homeless issues.
Solving homeless issues shouldn’t be done by sacrificing the stability and security of the existing neighborhood.
Boaz Ben-Zvi
Location:
Submitted At: 1:13pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose this proposal. Building a homeless shelter at the busy intersection of Benton and Lawrence Expy would endanger those residing there and the local traffic. This shelter would only serve as a political cover up ("we fight homelessness") but not solve the related issues of drug abuse, poverty, and mental illness.
Amy Zh
Location:
Submitted At: 1:12pm 04-25-23
Please stop building homeless shelter and stop ruining our living environment Chenpeng Huang
Location:
Submitted At: 1:10pm 04-25-23
I oppose to building this shelter
Siddharth Sodhani
Location:
Submitted At: 1:06pm 04-25-23
I am opposed to the idea of low entry barrier for this housing. Can we please increase the background checks that needs to be performed?
Angel Wong
Location:
Submitted At: 1:05pm 04-25-23
Strongly Oppose! Kids are no safe, too close to schools and residential areas! Ross leoson
Location:
Submitted At: 1:00pm 04-25-23
Please don't build homeless shelter in City of Santa Clara.
Zhihao Ji
Location:
Submitted At: 12:56pm 04-25-23
As a local resident, I strongly oppose the proposal.
The construction cost is way too high, almost $1 million per family unit, and there's still the financial gap every year. That's totally a waste of tax money.
Also LifeMoves cannot show it can really help homeless people move to their next step. In MTV LifeMoves, success rate is only 26%!
So I believe, LifeMoves & County are not trustworthy partners to work with. Please reconsider this project and vote NO!!!
Richard Wen
Location:
Submitted At: 12:44pm 04-25-23
I STRONGLY oppose this decision. As a resident of this area, I have seen firsthand the struggles that individuals experiencing homelessness face, and I believe that more needs to be done to address this urgent issue.
Research has shown that homeless shelters can lead to increased crime rates, decreased property values, and other issues that could harm our community. Therefore, I urge you to consider alternative solutions Bonnie Wishon
Location:
Submitted At: 12:38pm 04-25-23
I STRONLY OPPOSE this proposal! As evidenced by the recent articles in the Mountain View Voice, LifeMoves' model has been shown to be ineffective and a waste of money. Most of their clients have not been able to find stable housing and many end up returning to homelessness.Our community has already taken on a fair share of the burden, and we cannot sustain anymore. City council members have a responsibility to represent the majority and make decisions that benefit the community as a whole.
Biao Wang
Location:
Submitted At: 12:29pm 04-25-23
Strongly opposed to build a homeless facility at Benton!!! There are many daycares, schools in this area. The non screen shelter can pose high risks to the children.
Please protect the children!
Joyce Huang
Location:
Submitted At: 12:25pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose this Bento shelter. It is wasting tax payer’s money and attract more homeless here.
Ankit Thakral
Location:
Submitted At: 12:23pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose this proposal as it will increase crime in the neighbourhood. I'm living in this neighbourhood for quite some time & crime has already been on rise. This will increase vandalism, drug problem in this area.
Maayan Segal
Location:
Submitted At: 12:21pm 04-25-23
I understand the good intention of this initiative, with that being said, I’m concerned that our kid’s safety is being compromised. I want my kids to feel comfortable and confident going to school or friends by themselves and this facility will definitely make me not allow them to do that.
As a neighborhood who is interested in attracting new young families, this act will do the opposite and harm our community.
Chuyao Cheng
Location:
Submitted At: 12:20pm 04-25-23
strongly oppose this shelter location! Bringing so many homeless to our neighborhood is just too much unknown and too many safe issues. Please listen to public voice on this! Santosh Singh
Location:
Submitted At: 12:15pm 04-25-23
I strongly OPPOSE 30-Unit Homekey Housing development proposal for a low barrier homeless shelter because of safety risk for the individuals living in neighborhood! Melody Rao
Location:
Submitted At: 12:09pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose the 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing program in our residential neighborhood due to safety concerns for our community and children, and the lack of transparency in its funding plan.
Seth Steingraph
Location:
Submitted At: 12:01pm 04-25-23
Please ask the people who support this proposal HOW CLOSE they live to this location. If they live very close and still support the project, then hats off to them. If, like me, they live a mile or more away, then take their comments with a grain of salt. It's very easy to claim the moral high ground when one is only minimally affected themselves; it's much harder when one has to actually deal with the consequences.
David Lu
Location:
Submitted At: 12:00pm 04-25-23
I'm living close to the Benton street. Santa Clara already has multiple similar facilities, there is already one just half a mile away. Enough is enough.
Eric Tong
Location:
Submitted At: 11:44am 04-25-23
I strongly oppose this proposal. As a resident living near the proposed site, I don’t feel safe for my kid and family considering the project is low barrier. The city should and could find a better place for this project Shraddha Desai
Location:
Submitted At: 11:42am 04-25-23
Two similar projects (Bella Vista and Benton) within a half mile of each other is not conducive to having a healthy environment.
Increase the percentage of low income units in all new developments to help improve housing conditions. That way those with limited means can be part of whole community and not live in projects that are seen as “less than”. Projects like these don’t help- they label people. We should help people assimilate.
Steven Chou
Location:
Submitted At: 11:38am 04-25-23
I strongly oppose the 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing program in our residential neighborhood due to safety concerns for our community and children, and the lack of transparency in its funding plan.
Zoey Todorov
Location:
Submitted At: 11:34am 04-25-23
Both the old and new proposal failed to provide details for site design. No mention of fence, whether a controlled entrance or not, justification on parking and building hight. Also how do the 30 units look like? How many rooms? How do they come up the number of 120 people? How many kitchens? A proposal without details should only get an no for voting.
Nanxi Li
Location:
Submitted At: 11:31am 04-25-23
I STRONGLY OPPOSE this proposal. The location is wrong, and LifeMoves is an unreliable partner to deliver success. It fails in all aspects: budget estimate, staff, service, execute policy, help homeless, manage neighborhood safety, and more.The comparable Milpitas project provides solid evidence on crime spike. The city is seeing striking crime statistics, with total police calls increasing by 300% and total fire calls by 400% in 2022.
We want a safe neighborhood!!!!!!!
Iris Chen
Location:
Submitted At: 11:30am 04-25-23
I oppose the Benton proposal for a low barrier housing project. It's really disappointing that the proposal has chosen this location, one of the last places that had community family events. Losing this valuable community gathering place would be a loss to our community.
Victoria Mallon
Location:
Submitted At: 11:29am 04-25-23
I oppose this proposal.The LifeMoves facility in Mt. View is an industrial area. The proposed facility for Santa Clara is surrounded by neighborhood and a number of schools which poses a significant public safety risk.
Additionally the idea that there will be no required screening or background checks of residents is not acceptablethis increases risk.It is a great hope of mine that the Council will listen to the neighbors and not just show the "hypocritical respect" and insincerity seen before.
Shalini Venkatesh
Location:
Submitted At: 11:23am 04-25-23
The number of unhoused people here is high and growing, with negative impacts for all of us. The current proposal would make a small but significant impact, as one piece of a larger regional and statewide approach to addressing the complex issues of the unhoused. The moral imperative for the City Council is clear. This is your chance to choose to do the right thing for the ENTIRE community. You have a responsibility to all people living in this city, not just the ones currently in homes.
Kumar PK
Location:
Submitted At: 11:16am 04-25-23
I strongly OPPOSE this project! A low-barrier shelter is not acceptable in a thick residential area with lots of schools around. It would pose significant safety concerns to our community and children. Recommend finding a different site which will not pose safety concerns to the community.
Tianshan Cui
Location:
Submitted At: 11:13am 04-25-23
I strongly oppose for the Benton shelter project for the following reason: 1) the place is very important for the community. we love the place and we could like to continue celebrating different festivals with our neighbors. 2) there are so many schools/day cares nearby. the low barrier shelter will introduce lots of safety issues, especially for our kids. 3) I highly doubt the approach is a good way to solve the issue just by looking at the data & analysis in other sites managed by lifemoves
Anu TD
Location:
Submitted At: 11:10am 04-25-23
I strongly oppose this project due to safety concerns. The site chosen for this project is (1) Close to many schools and (2) near a dense residential area. Recommend choosing a different site which does not raise these sort of safety concerns to the community.
Jenny Shalev
Location:
Submitted At: 10:55am 04-25-23
I oppose Benton proposal because of safety risk for the kids in the neighborhood. My kids and their friends walk and bike in this area on a regular basis, please keep it safe. Not all parents can drive their kids and it's important to keep the area walkable and safe.
Mamatha K
Location:
Submitted At: 10:52am 04-25-23
Strongly oppose this proposal, Unsafe for neighborhood kids and seniors. Many schools are in close vicinity.
Potential risks in increased illegal activities and crime rates.
Rakhee Narsude
Location:
Submitted At: 10:31am 04-25-23
I strongly oppose this Benton proposal for homeless shelter. I am a Realtor and I already see my buyers are reluctant to buy a house in this neighborhood. I personally know about the proposal and I have to disclose it to my clients, and as soon as they hear about it, their decision changes.
Anshul Nigham
Location:
Submitted At: 10:18am 04-25-23
- Kids will lose the ability to walk to a neighborhood pumpkin patch, Christmas tree farm and other things during festival time; a treasured activity for our family and many others we know. - Admittance to the proposed shelter will not require any minimum bar, decreasing both perceived and perhaps actual general safety, leading to fewer residents, children and families being able to walk around the neighborhood
Larry Tsai
Location:
Submitted At: 10:11am 04-25-23
I am opposed to this proposal due to the impact it will have on the local neighborhood and safety concerns for children who live and attend school in the area.
ZHENG ZHAO
Location:
Submitted At: 9:50am 04-25-23
I strongly oppose Benton proposal for a low barrier homeless shelter because of safety risk for the kids in neighborhood!
Arun Kumar
Location:
Submitted At: 9:48am 04-25-23
I strongly oppose this Benton proposal for homeless shelter. This is a densely populated residential neighborhood with lots of kids and elder folks whose safety will at risk with this proposal. Please take a look at San Francisco and how bad it has become due to this.The home property values will drop rapidly and no one will buy houses in this locality. Homeless shelters belong at commercial real estate or Santa Clara fair grounds. Requesting the city council to vote against this Benton proposal
Hiya Le
Location:
Submitted At: 9:24am 04-25-23
County and LifeMoves are not acting in good faith. County tried to give vague details of compromised proposal in last meeting tried to take quick vote from public. County is provided misguided information to get more HomeKey points. Distance of nearest bus stop is shown form end of the lot not from entry door. Grocery shop mentioned in report is 7-11 which is not a grocery store as per HomeKey guidelines. Number of schools shown I county reports are less. They are making sure that Sobrato wins
sergey gorbunov
Location:
Submitted At: 9:13am 04-25-23
I strongly oppose Benton proposal for a low barrier homeless shelter. The homeless shelter will bring to our neighborhood drugs and related crimes, vandalism. It is deeply disappointing the city council has chosen to ignore and misunderstand our community concerns.
faina kantor
Location:
Submitted At: 8:53am 04-25-23
I am writing to express my strong opposition about the Benton proposal for a low barrier homeless shelter. The homeless shelter will bring to our neighborhood drugs and related crimes, vandalism.
It is deeply disappointing that the city council has chosen to ignore and misunderstand our community's concerns.
Megan Katz
Location:
Submitted At: 6:41am 04-25-23
I am curious did the people who support this plan really understand the proposal? There is so much misleading information in it. With simple logic you can see LifeMoves plan to move families from shelter A to B and pretend B is a family shelter. They will move families from B to C and turn B into a low barrier shelter for singles. They are playing a game to fool our government and public.
Susan Spade
Location:
Submitted At: 6:01am 04-25-23
After attending all community meetings and doing research into the proposed interim housing project I’m overwhelmingly OPPOSED to this project. I cannot understand why stacking containers on a highly populated/trafficked expressway is a solution to creating a safe and secure environment for the people who are experiencing being unhoused. You can do better with finding a more suitable location for this project and not one that I will be looking out and seeing a 3 story monstrosity every day.
Duane Spade
Location:
Submitted At: 5:51am 04-25-23
Santa Clara resident for 59 years and I strongly OPPOSE this project. I live within 1000 feet of the project. This is a very congested traffic corridor. Directly across the street is a liquor store and 7-11? Lifemoves has already stated they want low-barrier, most challenging cases even though they don’t have the staffing to actively and effectively manage these sites.
I don’t trust you to have this cities best interests and either does the Grand Jury! Vote to OPPOSE this project! Ken Kratz
Location:
Submitted At: 12:58am 04-25-23
I live in a housing complex within ½ mile from the proposed project and I am a member of the Santa Clara Housing Advocates (SCHA) who support this project. The SCHA website lists the benefits of this project:
https://schousingadvocates.wixsite.com/benton.
I have lived in the neighborhood for 45 years and worked for the City as a Public Works Inspector for 30 years after attending U.C. Berkeley; my childhood family received government aid that prevented us from becoming homeless.
Siyu Hou
Location:
Submitted At: 12:50am 04-25-23
I strongly oppose the benton shelter project! I live in the Central Park neighborhood. It's unacceptable that our tax money would be spent in such a project that's is making our community worse and a lot more dangerous. There are lots of families with children living in this neighborhood. If this low-barrier shelter was built and a resident, could be kid, got hurt by people living in the shelter, would the initiator / manager / leader of this project be held responsible? Our lives matter too!
Allen Chin
Location:
Submitted At: 12:32am 04-25-23
I strongly oppose the proposal. Just look at the rising criminal rates near other homeless sites (e.g. MTV). I can't believe the high tax I've been paying is used for such a thing! The new proposal still doesn't add any screening and many safety concerns are still ignored. I'd recommend you stop wasting our time and withdraw the proposal completely. Go look at other sites further away from the residential area. Think more from our perspectives.
Everyone's life matters, not just those homeless
Feng Chen
Location:
Submitted At: 12:06am 04-25-23
I live in the santa clara area with my family (within 2-mile of the proposed shelter location). We strongly oppose the proposal!
William Yan
Location:
Submitted At: 12:02am 04-25-23
I strongly oppose this project. The safety concerns are huge. There are many schools and preschools in short distances from the proposed site. The shelter will attract more people with criminal history and people with addictions to the area. The potential risks to the children and residents nearby are unacceptable.
Sizhuo Zhang
Location:
Submitted At: 11:43pm 04-24-23
I strongly OPPOSE to this project! A low-barrier shelter is not acceptable in a residential area with schools around. It would pose significant safety concerns to our community.
The revisions of the proposal fail to address the fundamental concerns of the community. It's a complete waste of time and taxpayer's money.
Qing Sun
Location:
Submitted At: 11:30pm 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this project. The proposal with all the revisions is shortsighted without long term plan to address safety concerns raised by people who actually live in this community. Given the site is so close to many schools of young kids, this is unacceptable!
Subir Bhatt
Location:
Submitted At: 11:24pm 04-24-23
I oppose the project due to safety concerns that come with low barrier shelter with no background check for criminal or substance abuse. This site is in a well established residential area and close to 15 schools and many day cares. Statistics from similar sites in Milpitas and Mountain View show increase in crime rate and public service calls supported by police and fire department.
Geetha Rama
Location:
Submitted At: 10:59pm 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this. The one reason being my very young kids safety. They go to a schools and park nearby, a shelter without screening will be a big threat to them. We bought a home here keeping our kids safety and well being in mind, bringing this shelter here defies the purpose.
With this shelter here, we will lose our mental peace and our kids safety will our biggest worry.
Please have the shelter built in a commercial/downtown area which will be better for the homeless well being.
Ksenia Markina
Location:
Submitted At: 10:47pm 04-24-23
I can't believe they're even considering putting a homeless shelter right near the school in this nice neighborhood! This is a terrible idea! Think about the safety of the kids and the potential for increased crime rates. There's no way we should allow this to happen. People have worked hard to maintain a safe and prosperous community, and a homeless shelter here would only ruin it. There must be other places to build this shelter that won't destroy the quality of life which is hard to create
Pushpanjali Rao
Location:
Submitted At: 10:41pm 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this project. With majority of your citizens consistently opposing , I am not sure what else can be done to make city and county officials understand how this project impacts your tax paying residents safety & property prices. We already have examples how badly these projects have been failing( Milpitas being the latest example). Please do not make our kids the Guinea pigs in this social experiment in Santa Clara that is proven to Fail miserably in SF and other places.
Maxim Kukushkin
Location:
Submitted At: 10:40pm 04-24-23
Building a homeless shelter in our neighborhood may not be the most effective or beneficial solution. Alternative strategies, such as focusing on affordable housing options or tackling the root causes of homelessness, should be explored instead
Tatiana Lovetskaya
Location:
Submitted At: 10:35pm 04-24-23
There are valid concerns about safety and crime rates. While not all homeless individuals pose a risk, it is possible that the shelter could inadvertently attract individuals with criminal histories or drug addictions. This could lead to an increase in crime and negatively affect the sense of security in our neighborhood.
Linling He
Location:
Submitted At: 10:29pm 04-24-23
I oppose the project for the following reasons: 1. Unacceptable increase in crime rate and public service calls as supported by police and fire department data from other newly developed shelter sites; 2. Increase in drug use around facility and its negative influence on kids near by; 3. Environmental impact from the new construction and the operation of high density living units with no study done; 4. Questionable ability from Homekey to operate; 5.
Unclear funding for sustainability
Kirti Gokhale
Location:
Submitted At: 10:10pm 04-24-23
I strongly OPPOSE this proposal! I am a long time resident here and was leaving peacefully until now! This is so shocking to see the city is thinking to give a golden piece of land in the heart of the city to a homeless shelter!! This is a well established residential area no where close to any industrial area. How it can be a source of jobs? In fact, with the future existence of drug addicts or mentally ill leaving in the close proximity, we’re risking many lives of kids and adults! Realize !!!
George Kannathumadam
Location:
Submitted At: 10:07pm 04-24-23
Strongly disagree with the proposal. This proposal will not meet stated objectives because it fails to even nominally address causes of the problem at hand. This is an utter waste of time and taxpayer money Shyno George
Location:
Submitted At: 9:52pm 04-24-23
Poor use of taxes resulting in lower property values due to increased crime Connie Chou
Location:
Submitted At: 9:39pm 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this proposal. This is not a sensible location especially given proximity to dozens of schools and daycares. There has got to be better commercial locations for this type of housing where they are not in the middle of residences and can have better access to public transport and job opportunities! Zhanwei Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 8:42pm 04-24-23
strongly oppose! Residents need to be heard.
Kim Tanaka
Location:
Submitted At: 8:30pm 04-24-23
I Strongly Oppose this proposal. There are many children and schools in this area. The homeless cause the community environment to be messy, and even some homeless have drug issue or mental illness. Based on safety considerations, I T STRONGLY OPPOSE!
Zongqiu Ai
Location:
Submitted At: 8:22pm 04-24-23
Strongly oppose. Strongly oppose. Strongly oppose.
Zheyu Wu
Location:
Submitted At: 8:13pm 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this project. This project itself doesn't make any sense as it didn't ask for residents' opinion to start with.
Yiming Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 8:12pm 04-24-23
I am a resident here in Santa Clara County. I STRONGLY OPPOSED to this action as it will pose tremendous risk to the kids here.
Sumi Kamiya
Location:
Submitted At: 8:09pm 04-24-23
I wholeheartedly support this project. This will enrich our community and provide greatly needed support to the unhoused and help them get stable affordable housing.
I am shocked by the hurtful and discriminatory comments shared by many in opposition as seen by the misleading flyer found at my door.
Build this on an underutilized piece of property.
Aashi Verma
Location:
Submitted At: 7:39pm 04-24-23
I am in strong opposition of the homeless shelter because of the many safety concerns that come with it.
Naveen Yerneni
Location:
Submitted At: 6:45pm 04-24-23
I Strongly Oppose this proposal. The proposed location is in a residential area and next to bella vista shelter just 1500 mts away. The concentration of shelters in one area is concerning.The homeless folks do not live in the shelter all the time and instead roam around nearby neighborhoods creating nuisance. There are a lot of kids and schools in this area and this shelter would create safety issues as criminals might be housed in it. Please find a commercial location for this shelter
Mengyao Fu
Location:
Submitted At: 6:19pm 04-24-23
No low barrier shelter near my house!
Strongly NONONO!!!!
PLEASE LISTEN TO PEOPLE’S VOICE!!!
AMIT JAIN
Location:
Submitted At: 6:10pm 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this, this site is very near to two schools and Earl R. Carmichael Park on benton Street and this will impact the safety of residents which also include kids and elderly in the nearby areas on both sides of Lawrence.
Sathyashankar Nalka
Location:
Submitted At: 5:53pm 04-24-23
I strongly oppose the location Benton Street & Lawrence Expressway chosen for this project of low-barrier interim housing. There is overwhelming opposition to this location from community for valid reasons. There are enough vacant land in less populated nearby places. Why not county/city can find another location? Kuldeep Lonkar
Location:
Submitted At: 5:46pm 04-24-23
Strongly oppose!
Randy Liu
Location:
Submitted At: 5:34pm 04-24-23
Strongly opposed
Diane Harrison
Location:
Submitted At: 5:32pm 04-24-23
Please support this interim housing project; it is highly needed. Better yet, please restore the original proposal for up to 120 units; the need is far greater than only 30.
I am a senior who lives a few blocks away and does not fear poor people. I'd far rather give them a chance for hope and a better life.
Elsa Ken
Location:
Submitted At: 5:31pm 04-24-23
Strongly oppose!! Around my former home, there was a person with mental health issues in the neighborhood and often shouted aloud during the day. My kids were so scared and not willing to play outside of the house. This causes both mental and physical harms to my kids and forced me to move to the current home in Santa Clara.
The proposed unscreened shelter will likely have people with mental issue. That would be a serious threat to the safety and mental health of the kids in our community.
Liang Zou
Location:
Submitted At: 5:15pm 04-24-23
I STRONGLY OPPOSE the plan to build the low-barrier interim housing proposed at Benton Street & Lawrence Expressway. The location is WRONG for this project. Other similar projects have already shown negative safety effects on nearby neighborhoods, so I don't think we should repeat the same error again. The location needs to be re-chosen.
Please listen to the voice of the public and reject the proposal. The community needs the exact same land for holiday events.
Jimmy Liu
Location:
Submitted At: 5:14pm 04-24-23
Strong OPPOSE! The city only informed the residents nearby this shelter. But I think the parents of the kids in nearby schools have the right to know this as well. They have the right to know what is the potential safety risks for their kids. And they have the right to say 'No!'
For example, the nearby Stratford school has open playground for kids (no gate at all). I can’t imagine what will happen if there are several homeless with mental health issues come to interrupt those kids! Greg Dacosta
Location:
Submitted At: 5:05pm 04-24-23
Strict "NO".
Pre-fabricated units are not acceptable. It may be acceptable of non-residential area - building must match character of residential neighborhood
No more than 2 stories - 3 stories will evade privacy of SF homes behind the creek Each unit much have full Kitchen and Bathroom - No shared Kitchenette so that facility can be converted to permanent or affordable housing when needed in future
It must be strictly and exclusively for families with children under 10 years of age
ADITYA BANSAL
Location:
Submitted At: 5:04pm 04-24-23
Strongly Oppose this proposal!!
I have been a resident of this neighborhood for more than 5 years. There are a lot of kids and schools in this area and it isn't the correct location for a homeless shelter. There is sufficient data that correlates such shelters to increased alcohol and drug usage in the area they are opened. Such an influence is not good for kids. Moreover, >300K visitors visit the activities that are hosted here every year so it would be a great loss for the community.
Bess Henderson
Location:
Submitted At: 4:29pm 04-24-23
We OPPOSE the low-barrier interim housing proposed at Benton Street & Lawrence Expressway.
This is the WRONG location, with such close proximity to 16 schools near by.
LifeMoves has very bad operating records for their existing shelters. Why build more failure? This proposed Benton/Lawrence land already has very important community function, visited by 300,000 local Santa Clara residents every year.
John Sontag
Location:
Submitted At: 4:12pm 04-24-23
As a 40+ year resident of Santa Clara, living in a home within sight of the proposed Interim Housing development, I applaud the city and county for working to actively support the unsheltered members of our community. We have seen the growth of the unhoused population in our area over the past decades, and wishing for a solution from somebody, somewhere else has not helped. I would much rather we reach out and help our neighbors in need than have them living at margin on our streets,
Mingmin Zhu
Location:
Submitted At: 4:11pm 04-24-23
Strongly opposed to build a homeless facility at Benton!!! There are many daycares, schools in this area. Even the kids always play around this area. The non screen shelter can pose high risks to the children and families. Please protect the children! Vinod Yadav
Location:
Submitted At: 4:09pm 04-24-23
I strongly oppose the proposed low barrier homeless shelter. Cause
1. Because of such a low barrier to entry the shelter, it will very difficult to avoid actual junkie and drug addicts in this facility and this area will become next SF. With 7 eleven so close to this facility, it is going to be hub for all the addicts and junkies making it super difficult and un safe of families around the area.
2.It's too close to a densely populated residential area
3. Too close to many schools, our next gen
Tianqi Liu
Location:
Submitted At: 3:38pm 04-24-23
Strongly oppose!!
Lakshmi Yarlagadda
Location:
Submitted At: 3:22pm 04-24-23
I strongly OPPOSE low barrier entry interim housing at Lawrence and Benton.
This site is:
1. Too close to multiple schools
2. Located in residential area
In addition, data shows that criminal rate increases near shelters. This project raises safety risks to children and seniors live in the community and children attend school here.
We strongly urge the city to decline this proposal and find another non-residential site like the way other cities did (Palo Alto, Mountain View, Redwood City...)
Chandra Maddipatla
Location:
Submitted At: 3:16pm 04-24-23
Strongly oppose low barrier entry interim housing at Lawrence and Benton. It is going to make the neighborhood very unsafe. The authorities havent been able to come up with a concrete workable plan to ensure safety of the peaceful neighborhood. This housing is going to increase the crime rate significantly and make lives of everyone around the neighborhood miserable. Do not build the low barrier entry interim housing at Lawrence and Benton. It will ruin the peaceful neighborhood permanently
Jitesh Jain
Location:
Submitted At: 3:15pm 04-24-23
This location is too close to so many schools. I
Jingni Zhong
Location:
Submitted At: 3:05pm 04-24-23
This poses so much risk to the kid s going to school and neighbors. The low/no barrier housing at such a dense residential community is such a terrible idea.
Do you what your kid be harassed while playing on lawn or commuting to and from school? Do you want to find needles and used syringe on street or in your front yard? Do you want your packages be taken again and again? Whoever making these proposals are clearly irresponsible.
Niranjan Manjunath
Location:
Submitted At: 2:41pm 04-24-23
There're 13 schools within a 1 mile radius. This proposal isn't safe for any kids in the community. Low entry housing barrier like this will only lead to increase in crime rate and make Santa Clara unsafe Piyush Tiwari
Location:
Submitted At: 2:39pm 04-24-23
This will lead to high increase in crime rate and it becomes very unsafe for kids Serena Young
Location:
Submitted At: 2:24pm 04-24-23
I live close by and I, as well as 5000 more other neighbors, strongly oppose this! We collected over 5000 opposed wet signatures and submitted them to the city clerk. Why is it not included in the report?? Megan Miller
Location:
Submitted At: 2:16pm 04-24-23
The location is not a good choice. As a low barrier emergency interim housing, we should choose a location like other sites which are surrounded by commercial/industrial buildings.
Jane Mark
Location:
Submitted At: 2:05pm 04-24-23
This brings safety concerns to the neighborhood
Mary S.
Location:
Submitted At: 1:50pm 04-24-23
I support housing for families at the Benton site. I do NOT like the idea of seeing a storage pod building from my condo.
Howard Yan
Location:
Submitted At: 1:28pm 04-24-23
This project does not consider the interests of local residents.
Qi Ren
Location:
Submitted At: 12:59pm 04-24-23
I strongly oppose to the Benton project. This site is:
1. Too close to multiple schools.
2. Located in residential area.
In addition, data shows that criminal rate increases near shelters.
This project raises safety risks to children and seniors live in the community and children attend school here.
We strongly urge the city to decline this proposal and find another non-residential site.
Dhruv Singh
Location:
Submitted At: 12:12pm 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this development which will have immediate negative impact on the qualify of the following
1. Kaiser hospital - expect unsafe and unfriendly conditions in a prime healthcare facility
2. Laurelwood and Dunford schools
3. Multiple residential apartment complexes that house children and families that attend the community public school
We strongly urge the city to find another location
Ada Yeung
Location:
Submitted At: 11:31am 04-24-23
I strongly oppose the proposed Benton development. The location of this shelter is a major safety threat to the community, particularly the children in the area. With over 15 schools and over 10 thousands of students in close proximity, the potential risks are too high to ignore. I urge the City Council to reconsider and find an alternative non-residential location and do not put our children at risk.
Taoran Lu
Location:
Submitted At: 11:15am 04-24-23
We have been living in Santa Clara for ten years. We strongly oppose this plan. It is not the right location for the homeless people we are trying to help with. The site is too close to Lawrence express way. There are barely no sidewalks and traffic speed usually can reach 60MPH. It puts their lives at risk considering they may have problem with alcohol and drugs so they may not control themselves as good as ordinary people when they walk on streets.
Xiao Yu
Location:
Submitted At: 10:59am 04-24-23
Strongly oppose this proposal. The county is trying to polish and rush the project. Low entry barrier beings serious risks to children and seniors in the neighborhood. Residents are deeply worried about the risk increased of increased crime and exposure to drugs, alcohol, etc.
Yao Wang
Location:
Submitted At: 10:54am 04-24-23
Oppose !!!
Wei Zhou
Location:
Submitted At: 10:37am 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this proposal, as it puts residents in the area in the risk without consideration This is such a misleading proposal without even enough homework being done. It includes tons of idealistic but unrealistic assumptions for the cost based on best case budget with super precise spending which we never see they made that before.
With all the data disclosed, it includes full of conditional statements which indicate that they plan to change it anytime
Jain Wu
Location:
Submitted At: 10:35am 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this project. As a Santa Clara resident living here for years and having multiple kids attending schools nearby, I am deeply worried about the safety of our next generation because of this project.
Hongliang Fei
Location:
Submitted At: 10:28am 04-24-23
Strongly oppose to build the shelter in a high density residential area. I believe that it is important to address the issue of homelessness, but I also believe that it is important to do so in a way that does not put the safety of our community at risk. I am not sure that a no-barrier shelter is the best solution for our community. I would like to see more research done on the effects of no-barrier shelters on crime rates and public safety.
Kim Jin
Location:
Submitted At: 10:26am 04-24-23
As a local resident and father of 2 young kids, I strong oppose this low entry barrier shelter in the neighborhood.
Kate Cao
Location:
Submitted At: 9:57am 04-24-23
As a local resident, I strongly oppose this project!!! Lifemove has no good track record to keep their promises such as 7/24 staff, case managers etc, they are really understaff , the local newspaper has 4 articles about Lifemove that they are understaffed, poor success rate to meet their promises and spent more much more money than planning!! How can you trust this kind of company? They have high turnover rate for their employees and the cost will be even more!!
Nataraj Batchu
Location:
Submitted At: 9:28am 04-24-23
I strongly oppose the proposed Homekey project. Its in middle of thick residential area with many schools around.
We are worried about the risk of increased crime, drugs which impacts children severely. Please find a place away from Schools.
Shaunak Chatterjee
Location:
Submitted At: 9:03am 04-24-23
I am strongly opposed to the current proposal as there are no adequate counter-measures to help the existing community feel safe. None of their valid concerns (as extensively voiced already in other comments) are addressed in the current proposal.
Pilar Furlong
Location:
Submitted At: 8:57am 04-24-23
Bill Wilson Center strongly supports the proposed Homekey project at Lawrence Exp. & Benton. For 50 years we have offered safe housing to homeless youth in Santa Clara. By providing 80 – 120 interim housing units that are near public transit and provide on-site supportive services (including case management to help with linkages to employment resources, education, and health care), the City is offering homeless individuals and families a safe place to stay while they rebuild their lives.
Vidushi Gupta
Location:
Submitted At: 8:47am 04-24-23
Unsafe for neighborhood kids, schools are in close vicinity. Potentially risks increase in illegal activities.
Neang Ly
Location:
Submitted At: 8:40am 04-24-23
We already have many Homekeys in the area and limited resources for police & security, as the policies do not respond even if we feel unsafe for individuals trespassing on our properties. My questions are:
1. Would you, as councilmembers be responsible for our community safety?
2. If safety issues arrive due to this, and with limited resources, who will be responsible? Would the council members be accountable for our financial loss or emotional damage due to this? Abhishek Gupta
Location:
Submitted At: 8:09am 04-24-23
Screening is a must for letting someone in.
Harini Va
Location:
Submitted At: 7:10am 04-24-23
Strongly oppose! The proposed plan and the few meetings I attended fail to convince me on the long term advantage of such a shelter in this neighborhood. With no proper screening and long term security measures in place, I’m hugely concerned about the safety of the vulnerable residents of such a low-barrier shelter along with the rest of the neighborhood. I urge my reps to strongly oppose this initiative and look at other ways to resolve homelessness.
Daniel Lin
Location:
Submitted At: 7:03am 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this proposal. Low entry barrier beings serious risks to children and seniors in the neighborhood. Parents of kids are worried about the risk increased of increased crime and exposure to drugs, alcohol, etc.
Jiatong Chen
Location:
Submitted At: 2:22am 04-24-23
The low barrier entry bar will bring drug addicts, mentally unstable homeless people to the scene, which will harm the safety of nearby neighborhoods, especially to children. It’s so close to so many schools, day cares. Such high density building will create traffic and parking problems as well. The noise from Lawrence will not be good for people with mental illness to live inside. Putting people with crime history in a high density building will make it a crime scene in the end.
Jack Auff
Location:
Submitted At: 1:29am 04-24-23
Oppose! Community concerns are being ignored despite schools and parks within 2000 ft. of the proposed housing site and the lack of background checks for residents. "Family only" doesn't guarantee safety. Feedback cards are selectively considered, excluding emails after March 21st. A new proposal has been presented and put to vote, disregarding previous engagement meetings. Council members deny involvement in the county project and officials coach students to speak in support of it.
Neil Arsul
Location:
Submitted At: 1:23am 04-24-23
I strongly oppose the proposed shelter in Benton. It's too close to residential areas, schools, and community hubs, and could increase crime rates and harm children. The lack of screening for occupants is a safety risk, and the unclear funding and inability to ensure building standards are met are concerning. This proposal is not a solution to homelessness and would sacrifice the safety of the community.
Swapnil Harsule
Location:
Submitted At: 1:10am 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this proposal. The county is trying to rush the project. Low entry barrier beings serious risks to children and seniors in the neighborhood. Parents of kids are worried about the risk increased of increased crime and exposure to drugs, alcohol, etc.
Neelima Yenigalla
Location:
Submitted At: 12:31am 04-24-23
Strongly oppose the location for the proposed project. Idea to help homeless persons is welcome but the place is not right. In my work I see lot of homeless people that say there is rampant drug use in these kind of places. With so many schools close by, not safe. Please find a place away from schools and thickly populated residential units.
Reena Gupta
Location:
Submitted At: 12:04am 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this project due to to its location close to residential community and many schools in the near vicinity. I’d be highly concerned about safety and security of our children and families. If city would like to provide a shelter for homeless, keep it outside of the city and give them appropriate rehabilitation and work opportunities.
Puxiao Han
Location:
Submitted At: 11:58pm 04-23-23
I strongly oppose to this proposal as it will make our neighborhoods not safe anymore.
Mengqi Ren
Location:
Submitted At: 11:52pm 04-23-23
Strong NO to this proposal. It is too close to residential area which will raise crime rate and damage the community. Sacrifice other people’s safety is not the way to solve homelessness problem! Enlin Wang
Location:
Submitted At: 11:14pm 04-23-23
Oppose this proposal. There are many schools around this area. Without screening the shelter residents, it’s irresponsible for the kids. If anything happen to the kids because of this, will city take full responsibility? Pedro Ta
Location:
Submitted At: 11:07pm 04-23-23
I oppose this proposal. Allowing occupants who have not been screened, particularly those with criminal records, could create safety concerns for the area.
Hui Zhuo
Location:
Submitted At: 10:38pm 04-23-23
Strong oppose! Low barrier, no screening; occupants with drug addiction, criminal records, sex offenders Benton location is a bustling community hub attracting 3,000+ families yearly Over 11k families are at risk; similar sites experienced a rise in police calls A second shelter opened 0.5 miles away
Shen Yu
Location:
Submitted At: 10:34pm 04-23-23
I strongly oppose this proposal. It poses risks to the community's safety as a low barrier shelter, is based on unrealistic assumptions for funding and construction, and would take away an irreplaceable community hub.
Alick Wang
Location:
Submitted At: 10:25pm 04-23-23
Strong No from my side! The City keeps on calling the Benton location a "vacant land," but it is one of the last few community hubs that local families use to celebrate holiday traditions. In addition, there're thousands of households nearby, plus quite a few schools or kindergartens that students or kids go to every day. Has the city considered the safety of our next generations?
Joe Fincutter
Location:
Submitted At: 10:22pm 04-23-23
As of today 4/23/2023, I am opposed to the project as proposed. My primary concerns are:
1. Candidates for the interim housing are wide open exposing the community to high repeat offenders:
a. Child abuse
b. Violent actors (drug and mental health issues, jailed for violence)
2. Funding is vague and open ended.
3. Homekey funding eliminates ability to assure normal building standards are met (i.e. earthquake standards).
Haomin Guo
Location:
Submitted At: 10:21pm 04-23-23
If the city continues with the project at this location, it is putting the church children next door in danger by placing them among psychologically disturbed adults. I am opposed! Ying Liu
Location:
Submitted At: 10:15pm 04-23-23
I strongly oppose this proposal. Building a homeless shelter so close to a busy traffic street, schools, and residential areas is not safe at all for everyone.
Brian West
Location:
Submitted At: 10:01pm 04-23-23
We, as residents of the neighborhood near Benton & Lawrence, are strongly opposed to the proposed Benton/Lawrence homeless shelter. This radical idea of placing homeless shelter in middle our residential communities is SICK, to say the lease. We urge you to Vote NO! Stop this insane proposal.
Taimei Yeh
Location:
Submitted At: 9:55pm 04-23-23
I strongly oppose the projected site at Benton and Lawrence. Simply because children safety and sever short of parking for the next door.
Ezra Yeung
Location:
Submitted At: 9:38pm 04-23-23
Where do city plan to find an open lot at the site to accommodate 50 plus more cars for next door church lease parking?
Therefore, I strongly oppose building this homeless shelter at this location between Benton and Lawrence.
Shu Ch
Location:
Submitted At: 9:29pm 04-23-23
As Santa Clara residents, our family strongly oppose this proposal.
1. LifeMoves' approach of sheltering has a low success rate of helping homeless and achieving their promises.
2. There was no actionable plan for this construction that was properly communicated with the neighborhood community. Throughout past 4 meetings, the details of this site kept changing.
3. There is strong opposition to this from residents nearby (in the last zoom, 80% of attendees vote no).
Please hear us and vote no!
Hanting Yeh
Location:
Submitted At: 9:24pm 04-23-23
City is putting the next door church children in danger by immerse church children among psychologic problematic people if city insists with the project at this site. I oppose! Qingyi Liu
Location:
Submitted At: 8:42pm 04-23-23
Strong NO. This project must be stopped.
1. There are ~10 schools within 1 mile. A low barrier shelter put so many children's safety at risk. Parents are concerned.
2. Even school teachers cannot afford to live in this area. Why get a low barrier homeless shelter first?
3. Listen to the people. If a public hearing does not listen to the public, what is the sense of doing this? Remember the power is given by the people. The money is given by the tax payers. Don't spend our money against us!
Leon Liang
Location:
Submitted At: 8:29pm 04-23-23
Strong NO. This project must be stopped.
1. There are ~10 schools within 1 mile. A low barrier shelter put so many children's safety at risk. Parents are concerned.
2. Even school teachers cannot afford to live in this area. Why get a low barrier homeless shelter first?
3. Listen to the people. If a public hearing does not listen to the public, what is the sense of doing this? Remember the power is given by the people. The money is given by the tax payers. Don't spend our money against us!
Dave Huoang
Location:
Submitted At: 8:27pm 04-23-23
The proposed shelter is a sham and a waste of our tax funding, I stead of finding a solution to homelessness, the career bureaucrats have resorted to just trying to win tax funding without considering the long term funding requirements and wether LifeMoves is qualified to even run these shelters. Recent study have found LifeMoves is squandering our hard earned tax dollars by failing the homeless shelter residents. Not only that they pay excessive CEO bonus. This is an absolute no.
Yiran Yan
Location:
Submitted At: 7:45pm 04-23-23
I strongly oppose this project.
A low barrier intrim housing project should not be located the a residential area and so close to so many schools.
And there was a very similar project proposed at White Oak Lane. It didn’t pass because it’s not financially feasible and would be too close to a high-speed intersection.
The Lawrence & Benton site is similarly close to the high-speed intersection. And it would cost more than 10 million dollars annually on operation.
This project should be stopped.
Connie Zhang
Location:
Submitted At: 7:36pm 04-23-23
I strongly oppose Benton shelter, it causes a serious risk to local residents and schools! In previous poll during hearing, there’s clearly 80%+ oppose this shelter proposal, it’s a wrong location! Please listen to your people and your voters and vote NO to this shelter!
Frey Zhou
Location:
Submitted At: 7:21pm 04-23-23
80-95% local residents opposed this proposal in the most recent zoom meeting. These shelters should never be built in the residential area.
Rachel Zhang
Location:
Submitted At: 7:13pm 04-23-23
The location has a serious safety risk to the neighborhood. We shouldn’t put our children at risk. A big NO to this project!
Narayan Chalasani
Location:
Submitted At: 6:31pm 04-23-23
A strong NO to this project. It poses a major safety and security concern for the area.
Youyou Tan Tan
Location:
Submitted At: 5:59pm 04-23-23
This location is a joke. Mountain View site is under staff because they can not afford live nearby. We should spend our money more wisely.
Gajra Sinha
Location:
Submitted At: 4:57pm 04-23-23
A strong NO to this project. It poses a major safety and security concern for the area. It is close to major expressway, schools, single family homes and above all next to the gas station and liquor store.
Piyush Agarwal
Location:
Submitted At: 4:51pm 04-23-23
As a local resident, I vehemently oppose this project, and urge city council members to please consider the safety of all us residents and their families including children of all ages. Do the council members not desire safety of us residents? It is shocking that this is still being considered.
I urge that we all collectively vote "NO" on this project to save this neighborhood and community. None of us will forget the callous attitude on display should this project go ahead.
Hardik Darji
Location:
Submitted At: 4:49pm 04-23-23
Homeless shelter near my home is harmful for my family. I strongly oppose it Saurabh Sinha
Location:
Submitted At: 4:46pm 04-23-23
As a resident of Santa Clara for last 15+ years, I strongly oppose the project because it will increase safety and security of the neighborhood. I rather do a project for affordable housing for school teachers and other govt. officials.
The Project site is so close to major traffic cross roads and near schools poses enhanced security and safety issues for the community. Please say NO to this project.
Ryan Komand
Location:
Submitted At: 4:31pm 04-23-23
As a local resident, I strongly oppose this project, and urge city council members to vote NO on this project. My points are below:
1. From 4 community meetings, we didn't get any concrete plan about this shelter, which really disappointed me.
2. According to recent news about LifeMoves Palo Alto and LifeMoves Mountain View, I don't think LifeMoves is a trustworthy partner to build or operate ANY shelter.
Please vote "NO" on this project. Or it will definitely be a disaster to the community Lakshmi Vaidyanathan
Location:
Submitted At: 4:31pm 04-23-23
I strongly oppose to the proposal. It is going to make the neighborhood extremely unsafe with several schools in the vicinity.
Lu Peng
Location:
Submitted At: 4:03pm 04-23-23
I strongly oppose the proposal due to the concern for safety of my children who attend Monticello Academy nearby.
Yangyang Sun
Location:
Submitted At: 3:59pm 04-23-23
I am deeply concerned about the interim housing at Benton. I have two kids in the school within 1 mile. My concerns are:
1. Lack of adequate security measures for the safety of the children attending elementary school. This includes security cameras, trained security personnel, and strict policies/vetting on the resident in the shelter.
2. The children may not fully understand the concept of homelessness and could be frightened or disturbed by seeing homeless individuals on a regular basis.
Rose Joseph
Location:
Submitted At: 3:35pm 04-23-23
Oppose Benton shelter
1. Our kids need a safe neighborhood, not one where they have to look over their shoulders while walking to school or playing at the park. Without adequate background checks in place, the shelter is inviting addicts and criminals into the neighborhood.
2.I fail to understand how the shelter can help addicts when there is a liquor store at the doorstep of the proposed site. What they need is rehabilitation.
3.Please find a location outside of residential neighborhood.
Amrutha kollipara
Location:
Submitted At: 3:20pm 04-23-23
As an eighth grade student with a younger brother, I strongly oppose this idea. The neighbors living in the neighborhood are parents of young kids, putting their safety at risk. I sympathize with the ones living with poverty, however, putting others’ life at risk is not okay. My school is next to the proposed site as well as many others including preschools and daycares. This is why I am in strong opposition of this idea. Thank you.
Chaitanya Banda
Location:
Submitted At: 3:18pm 04-23-23
I strongly oppose the construction at this location. I am concerned about the safety. My kids go to school near by and now I don’t feel safe for them to walk home or play around the neighborhood. When my parents visit, the only excitement here for them apart from spending time with us is to walk around as they can’t drive. With this, i fear safety for them too. Don’t make this neighborhood desolated. Please keep it cheerful as it is now. Thank you.
Sonia Singhal
Location:
Submitted At: 3:01pm 04-23-23
I have voted yes on every tax increase, welfare program & wage increase. But this proposal has so many issues.
First bucketing mentally disable, substance abuse, criminals into same bucket as homeless is wrong. All need help but in different ways. Whats more disturbing is the data coming from existing sites on failed programs & increase in crime. If I have tell my kids that their beloved pumpkin patch is closed & also that you cant go out on streets anymore, there is something seriously wrong.
Chao Wang
Location:
Submitted At: 2:56pm 04-23-23
It is deeply disappointing that the city council has chosen to ignore and misunderstand our community's concerns.
Even more disheartening is the fact that the council has put forth a totally new proposal right before the voting date, which after a mere glance, is full of misleading information, inconsistent wordings, and ambiguous descriptions. This is totally unacceptable.
We want to make it abundantly clear that we will not tolerate any attempt to mislead or deceive us.
Selvi Ponniah
Location:
Submitted At: 2:53pm 04-23-23
Wrong location for the propose of low barrier entry facility. Safety and security implications are huge given the neighborhood with lots of schools and kids .
Daniel Wang
Location:
Submitted At: 2:46pm 04-23-23
I strongly oppose this proposal for three reasons. Firstly, there are already many schools located within one mile of this site. Secondly, there is already a homeless shelter located within half a mile of the proposed site, and it is not appropriate to build two shelters in such close proximity in a single neighborhood. Finally, the background check protocol for this shelter is not clear to all, which raises concerns about the safety of the community.
Therefore, I strongly oppose this proposal.
Yanhong Zhao
Location:
Submitted At: 2:42pm 04-23-23
Strong oppose. Please find a non-residential neighborhood for this project. There are so many schools, day care in this neighborhood.
Madhu Sridhar
Location:
Submitted At: 2:42pm 04-23-23
I oppose this because of the location. This is not appropriate for a residential neighborhood and in the vicinity of schools.
Ann Jo
Location:
Submitted At: 2:30pm 04-23-23
I oppose this project due to its location. Please find an alternative nonresidential neighborhood for this project.
Mudita singhal
Location:
Submitted At: 2:24pm 04-23-23
Incompetent decision and choice to think that a heavily residential working class neighborhood with kids walking alone from several schools in the area is the best choice for a low barrier to entry shelter. Strongly oppose. You CAN do better. You SHOULD do better!!
Fred Deng
Location:
Submitted At: 2:17pm 04-23-23
Strongly oppose to Benton shelter. This residential neighborhood is surrounded by so many schools, daycares and is also next to a high-speed intersection. There're so many reasons to show that this is obviously a WRONG location for a shelter. Please vote NO and find non-residential parcels to go ahead with this proposal.
Shuyang Cheng
Location:
Submitted At: 2:11pm 04-23-23
Wrong location. I strongly oppose to this proposal and have concerns about the safety of the students or the residents in the surrounding area if the project gets passed. Any politicians who vote Yes should step down and they will.
Yuanzhe Han
Location:
Submitted At: 2:01pm 04-23-23
I oppose for the safety of our children.
Tianqi Wang
Location:
Submitted At: 1:28pm 04-23-23
Strongly oppose to Benton shelter. Very concerned about the public safety with an unvetted shelter inside neighborhood and close to schools.
Amy Ho
Location:
Submitted At: 1:08pm 04-23-23
_________________________Oppose Benton Shelter
My name is Amy, resident of Santa Clara. I strongly oppose Benton shelter. This is the wrong location. I urge you to cease consideration of this location, and vote no as our representative. City and county need to find a nonresidential land for the facility like this.
I’m counting on you.
Weiyi Liu
Location:
Submitted At: 1:07pm 04-23-23
Too close to schools and homes. 5000+ petitions with wet signatures to veto this proposal were collected, but county just blatantly ignored them. The game is rigged.
Birdland JM
Location:
Submitted At: 12:58pm 04-23-23
Without strict vetting and background screening, the uncontrolled accommodation of the homeless will cause safety issues for nearby residents. Therefore I strongly oppose this project L. H.
Location:
Submitted At: 12:16pm 04-23-23
As a local resident, I strongly oppose the Benton project. Homekey's two fundamental principles, "Housing First" and "Low Barrier," are flawed and ineffective in solving homelessness while posing serious safety risks to nearby neighborhood. Without background check, is it even going to be safe for the children in the shelter?! There are many false statements in the proposal, e.g. 63% found permanent housing, immediate eviction, no shortage of police force, etc.
Citycouncil, please vote NO!
SE Birdland
Location:
Submitted At: 12:05pm 04-23-23
‘We can’t put the shelter on other county land because THEY ARE PARKS’, according to Ms Hernandez. It won’t serve Santa Clara’s ’250 unsheltered’. It’ll serve the developers & nonprofits. They’ll place anyone the county chooses to place there. San Jose has 7000 (65%) of the homeless; Santa Clara has less than 250 (3%). You are pushing out your very diverse, middle income constituents. No other city puts shelters in a neighborhood, except San Jose or LA. And more Brown act violations, again!
Anjali Surapaneni
Location:
Submitted At: 12:03pm 04-23-23
I strongly oppose this shelter at this this location. We cannot have a low barrier shelter so close to families and schools. No background checks are not acceptable when it comes to safety of our families. The solution today looks more of a “ bait and switch” tactic to coerce a yes out of residents. Please consider voting NO. County cannot push us to accept something unsafe for our families on our tax paying $. Don’t lead Santa Clara to path of destruction like San Francisco.Please vote NO!
Rui Zhang
Location:
Submitted At: 12:01pm 04-23-23
City council just ignore majority neighbors strong opposition, Neelu Kumawat
Location:
Submitted At: 11:57am 04-23-23
All the council members who have the power to vote, please know the whole community is depending on you and that your decision will impact the daily lives of all of us. God forbid, if there happens a single incident because of your decision, you’ll have to live with it forever. Please cast your vote responsibly.
Gautam Kulkarni
Location:
Submitted At: 11:55am 04-23-23
Strongly oppose. It is appalling that the city/county would consider putting a low-barrier homeless shelter in a family neighborhood with so many children and schools in close proximity. The planners/representatives have displayed a cavalier attitude towards safety concerns raised by hardworking, tax-paying citizens. Moreover, the financial aspects have not been shared. We will hold you accountable for the inevitable crime wave. We will recall officials if needed - we have the numbers.
Alex Wang
Location:
Submitted At: 11:48am 04-23-23
Strongly oppose. This is not a right location where it’s close to many schools, daycares and next to a high speed intersection. No transparency in financial status. The attempt to attract more homelessness to our neighborhoods is intolerable. No proper arrangements for those who got released or kicked out from the site. They can and will continue to stay nearby.
Notice people who support are mostly not living nearby. They are exploiting our safety to reach their “honorable” intends.
Yuan Yao
Location:
Submitted At: 11:44am 04-23-23
Strong oppose this bill, I am a father of two. My kid live and go schools in here. This development will definitely make this area unsafe
Yi Du
Location:
Submitted At: 11:39am 04-23-23
I strongly oppose this proposal. Overwhelmingly majority residents have said repeatedly no homeless shelter in residential area ever. If city members ignore residents interests and harm children’s safety, be prepared to face electoral and legal consequences.
Mahendra Chaudhari
Location:
Submitted At: 11:38am 04-23-23
I strongly oppose this.I understand we all needs to do something to address homelessness, and willing to discuss/brainstorm for alternative solutions. This site isn’t ideal for homeless shelter for many reasons. Please consider to vote NO on this. Instead build low income housing, facilitate classes for kids in low income families.
Some of us, who lives in this neighborhood can probably volunteer to teach kids robotics, programming, etc. It can prepare kids for better employment opportunities
vivian zhang
Location:
Submitted At: 11:36am 04-23-23
I strongly oppose the proposed homeless shelter. This is a horrible plan and the city is trying to bypass the residents to sneak through. shame on you!
Jie Han
Location:
Submitted At: 11:29am 04-23-23
No low barrier shelter near our kids!
BJ Huang
Location:
Submitted At: 11:28am 04-23-23
I strongly oppose the proposed homeless shelter at Benton and Lawrence.
It is WRONG to place a homeless shelter in a residential community with so many K to 12 schools so close to the proposed location.
raymond chang
Location:
Submitted At: 11:28am 04-23-23
I strongly oppose the location. this was a family activity location for holidays. My kids goes to school around this area. The city does not listen. Next election we will vote them out.
David Tran
Location:
Submitted At: 11:17am 04-23-23
I live in the neighborhood and I strongly oppose the proposed location of this shelter. It’s so close to residential communities and many schools. I empathize with helping those in need but there are better locations. Trying to fulfill a state mandate against the will of the residents is appalling (80% opposition in community meetings) and brings to question the legality if this passes.
Shame on the city.
We responsible citizens who the city claims to represent deserve better.
Harsha Vashisht
Location:
Submitted At: 11:07am 04-23-23
Strongly oppose the location. Residential neighborhood surrounded by so many schools is not a good location for low barrier housing. Safety is a very big concern. The concerns of the community have been downplayed and feels like the stakeholders want to go ahead in spite of the strong push back. Please find non residential parcels to go ahead with this proposal. Use this site to build longterm housing for our first responders, teachers and retail workers.
Deepak Rama
Location:
Submitted At: 11:06am 04-23-23
Horrible planning. No financial viability. Huge security risks for neighborhood. No respect for taxpayers and voters. Proximity to schools, liquor stores and disruption to peaceful neighborhood. Expressway close by poses risk to ppl living in proposed site. Low barrier entry and lack of proper planning. Collusion with life works! Yuan Tian
Location:
Submitted At: 10:59am 04-23-23
I live in walking distance to this location and know how many schools and kids are nearby. Strongly oppose this location! There needs to be a more careful assessment on the location and screening policy.
Melissa Lee
Location:
Submitted At: 10:52am 04-23-23
Strong oppose! Low barrier, no screening; occupants with drug addiction, criminal records, sex offenders Benton location is a bustling community hub attracting 3,000+ families yearly Over 11k families are at risk; similar sites experienced a rise in police calls A second shelter opened 0.5 miles away
LifeMoves is poorly staffed, low success rate in permanent housing, and location far from public transit, grocery, jobs
False data was presented, no integrity!
Politically motivated supporters.
Darshana Parmar
Location:
Submitted At: 10:50am 04-23-23
- We demand full CEQA evaluation before city provides HomeKey support letter for application - Financing details are still not exposed. Homekey 3.0 requires city to operate for 30 years. How city will support once funding runs out without creating burden on tax payers - We must preserve this last community resort
- Facility is NOT exclusive for families with children. Last minute slipping in provision to house adults only - Without BC check, sec offenders can’t be identified. Megan’s law violat Tammy Wang
Location:
Submitted At: 10:47am 04-23-23
I live in the neighborhood and I strongly oppose the proposed location of this shelter. It’s inappropriate to build a shelter so close to residential communities and many schools Anwesa Chatterjee
Location:
Submitted At: 10:43am 04-23-23
As a concerned resident, I cannot support the implementation of a low barrier homeless shelter in our neighborhood. The shelter will attract drug users and criminals, increase crime rates, and decrease property values. I fear that this decision was made without considering the impact on our community. Let's work together to find a solution that benefits everyone and keeps our community safe and thriving.
Anunay Bhatt
Location:
Submitted At: 10:41am 04-23-23
I and my family strongly oppose this proposed shelter location. We support homelessness and agree that they need housing. But this location has many families and children which makes it a poor choice for the low-barrier shelter. Instead of further developing the area, this is a retrograde step for the hard-working, tax paying residents of Santa Clara city. County should instead consider other non-residential parcels with good public transit access for this cause.
SCC Safe
Location:
Submitted At: 10:32am 04-23-23
SafeSCC promotes safe neighborhoods and has sent 7 documents to the city clerk for public agenda inclusion, but they were not added:
1-3. Three open letters to city council oppose Benton project - 3/9, 3/13, 4/11
4. 5293 Petition Submission Cover Letter - 4/14
5. 10 Essential Facts to Know Before 4/25 vote
6. 10 Reasons Why Everyone Should Oppose Benton Shelter
7. "LifeMoves MTV promises to help homeless clients find stable housing in three months. The majority of them don't" Palo Alto Online
Sharon Shaon
Location:
Submitted At: 10:24am 04-23-23
As a Santa Clara resident, I oppose the proposed location for a low-barrier, no screen check homeless shelter.
Over 80% of residents opposed it, but the government ignores us. The Bella Vista location is only 0.5 miles away and too close to residential areas and a nearby school. Find a more appropriate location.
Dhvani Desai
Location:
Submitted At: 10:14am 04-23-23
This is not a appropriate place as it's in middle of residential and school area and the occupants in this temporary dwelling are ex felony and mental health concern individuals which can endanger kids walking to schools Stephen Yang
Location:
Submitted At: 10:06am 04-23-23
I live within 3 miles of the site and my kids go to the laurelwood elementary school, which is within 2 miles of the place. Given the data showing the crime rates and 911 calls go up once a no screening interim housing shows up and common sense, I strongly appose the plan. It is not the right place to build the facility and right way to solve the homeless issue. I really doubt the motivations of the supporters and city council members who proposed the plan.
Vishal Tanna
Location:
Submitted At: 9:58am 04-23-23
Strongly oppose. LifeMoves is a horrible choice.
- Tricked Palo Alto city council by doubling construction budget after approval. Now reducing services promised to homeless clients
- MV site, previous to directors had criminal history and stole - Benton site, slipped in last minute change to make provision to house single adults as well - Previous MV site residents told stories about mismanagement, ill treatment in MV voice articles - Qualification for case manager is highschool diploma
Ashish Verma
Location:
Submitted At: 9:31am 04-23-23
I strongly oppose this proposal. Housing folks wothout even a background check where data suggests presence of convicts, felons, sex offenders in such proximity to residential neighborhoods is beyond comprehension to tax paying residents who foot the bill eventually. Please listen to your residents. If you impose this on us, you are severly impacting safety and pursuit of happiness for more than 5000+ of your residents directly. Who is accountable? The folks who vote yes to this?
Xufei Wang
Location:
Submitted At: 9:27am 04-23-23
I strongly oppose the Benton Shelter Proposal. I have been a Santa Clara for over 10 years. Over the years, I observed, reported, and in person experienced more and more crimes: my neigbors’s cars were broken into, my bikes got stolen, even my home was attempted to break in march. We paid tons of tax each year, the government should at least make sure we live in a safe place called home.
We are equally important as those who need a home. why should we live in fear? Jenny Zhang
Location:
Submitted At: 9:23am 04-23-23
I live in Santa Clara, and I strongly oppose this project. The low barrier shelter with no-screening will collect lots of drug addicts and criminals. The shelters in Milpitas and Palo Alto have proved this point. The wrong location in a neighborhood with so many schools and daycares will result in serious safety concern. In last city council meeting, some opposers offered a few alternative spots for this housing project. Please carefully consider these proposals.
Jaccard Pan
Location:
Submitted At: 9:15am 04-23-23
I strongly opposes the Benton Shelter Plan because LifeMoves has a very bad record of running homeless shelters in nearby cities. Do you know 74% of their clients are still homeless after existing LifeMoves' shelter, because they cannot get quality service from there? They don't even feel safe there. Do you know LifeMoves doubled the cost estimate of their existing shelter within a year of approval? The unreasonable cost overrun indicates LifeMoves are losing control of their project.
Joe Cheng
Location:
Submitted At: 8:52am 04-23-23
I live in Santa Clara and my family and I strongly oppose this shelter proposal because it is not safe! Lisa Eckstein
Location:
Submitted At: 7:33pm 04-22-23
I strongly support the interim housing to be built at Benton and Lawrence. I've been a Santa Clara homeowner for over 20 years. I live near Stevens Creek Boulevard and San Tomas, a part of our city where many people live on the street. I applaud Santa Clara for addressing our local homelessness crisis by providing more safe housing and much needed resources. If you can find an additional spot for a similar housing project in my neighborhood, I'd support that as well.
Agenda Item: eComments for REPORTS OF MEMBERS AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES Overall Sentiment
BJ Huang
Location:
Submitted At: 2:19pm 04-25-23
I STRONGLY OPPOSE.
The homeless are free to go in and out of the shelter. With the concentration of 200 plus "most challenging homeless", many no doubt with drug additions at this location, drug dealers will be attracted to come; it is well documented a concentration of homeless will attract drug dealers, as in Tenderloin, San Francisco. How many additional police officers are assigned to this precinct, dedicated to the “low barrier interim homeless shelter? Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:14pm 04-25-23
This is a huge safety issue for our neighborhood!
I STRONGLY OPPOSE building a homeless facility at Benton!! Agenda Item: eComments for CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Overall Sentiment
Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:15pm 04-25-23
This is a huge safety issue for our neighborhood!
I STRONGLY OPPOSE building a homeless facility at Benton!! SE Birdland
Location:
Submitted At: 5:35pm 04-23-23
"The proposed site is vacant land located at the intersection of Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street near the Santa/Clara Sunnyvale border." The county sat on this land for the benefit of certain developers (and to leverage fed/state funds) rather than making it available years ago for housing tech workers, public employees, and service workers who sit in traffic for 4 hours a day. Or to provide a county parkland for local residents like the many county parks in other cities.
Agenda Item: eComments for ADJOURNMENT
Overall Sentiment
BJ Huang
Location:
Submitted At: 2:28pm 04-25-23
We OPPOSE the proposed low barrier interim homeless shelter at Benton and Lawrence.
Mayor Gilmore, City Councilmembers: Just say NO.
Vote NO on this proposal, as the Representatives of this Great City.
Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:15pm 04-25-23
This is a huge safety issue for our neighborhood!
I STRONGLY OPPOSE building a homeless facility at Benton!! Agenda Item: eComments for The next regular scheduled meeting is on Tuesday, May 9, 2023 in the City Hall Council Chambers.
Overall Sentiment
Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:15pm 04-25-23
This is a huge safety issue for our neighborhood!
I STRONGLY OPPOSE building a homeless facility at Benton!! Agenda Item: eComments for MEETING DISCLOSURES
Overall Sentiment
Brian West
Location:
Submitted At: 2:57pm 04-25-23
Mayor Gilmore, City Councilmembers: We OPPOSE the low-barrier interim housing proposed at Benton St. & Lawrence Expressway.
Is LifeMoves transferring homeless families from old shelter to new shelter just to satisfy the opening of a new shelter? After all, they can pretty much do any changes they want once the shelter was built. Who regulate the homeless shelter? Who has the authority to shut down the shelter if laws were not followed? Example: MTV site failed to evict sexual assault client
Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:15pm 04-25-23
This is a huge safety issue for our neighborhood!
I STRONGLY OPPOSE building a homeless facility at Benton!! Bess Henderson
Location:
Submitted At: 4:52pm 04-24-23
We OPPOSE the low-barrier interim housing proposed at Benton St. & Lawrence Expressway.
This is the WRONG location, with such close proximity to 20 schools near by.
LifeMoves has very bad operating records for their existing shelters. Why build more failure? This proposed Benton/Lawrence land already has very important community function, visited by 500,000 local Santa Clara residents every year. It has been a tradition for our extended family to visit this place during Christmas and Halloween.
Agenda Item: eComments for The time limit within which to commence any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, unless a shorter limitation period is specified by any other provision. Under Section 1094.6, any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which such decision becomes final. Any lawsuit or legal challenge, which is not filed within that 90-day period, will be barred. If a person wishes to challenge the nature of the above section in court, they may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the meeting described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clara, at or prior to the meeting. In addition, judicial challenge may be limited or barred where the interested party has not sought and exhausted all available administrative remedies.
STREAMING SERVICES: As always, the public may view the meetings on SantaClaraCA.gov, Santa Clara City Television (Comcast cable channel 15 or AT&T U-verse channel 99), or the livestream on the City's YouTube channel or Facebook page.
Note: The public cannot participate in the meeting through these livestreaming methods; livestreaming capabilities may be disrupted at times, viewers may always view and participate in meetings in-person and via Zoom as noted on the agenda.
AB23 ANNOUNCEMENT: Members of the Santa Clara Stadium Authority, Sports and Open Space Authority and Housing Authority are entitled to receive $30 for each attended meeting.
Note: The City Council and its associated Authorities meet as separate agencies but in a concurrent manner. Actions taken should be considered actions of only the identified policy body.
LEGEND: City Council (CC); Stadium Authority (SA); Sports and Open Space Authority (SOSA); Housing Authority (HA); Successor Agency to the City of Santa Clara Redevelopment Agency (SARDA); Bayshore North Project Enhancement Authority (BNPEA); Public Facilities Financing Corporation (PFFC) Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City's official-notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City's website and in the City Clerk's Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting. A hard copy of any agenda report may be requested by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (408) 615-2220, email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or at the public information desk at any City of Santa Clara public library.
If a member of the public submits a speaker card for any agenda items, their name will appear in the Minutes. If no speaker card is submitted, the Minutes will reflect "Public Speaker." In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), the City of Santa Clara will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in its services, programs, or activities, and will ensure that all existing facilities will be made accessible to the maximum extent feasible. The City of Santa Clara will generally, upon request, provide appropriate aids and services leading to effective communication for qualified persons with disabilities including those with speech, hearing, or vision impairments so they can participate equally in the City's programs, services, and activities. The City of Santa Clara will make all reasonable modifications to policies and programs to ensure that people with disabilities have an equal opportunity to enjoy all of its programs, services, and activities.
Agendas and other written materials distributed during a public meeting that are public record will be made available by the City in an appropriate alternative format. Contact the City Clerk's Office at 1 408-615-2220 with your request for an alternative format copy of the agenda or other written materials.
Individuals who require an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication, or any other disability-related modification of policies or procedures, or other accommodation, in order to participate in a program, service, or activity of the City of Santa Clara, should contact the City's ADA Coordinator at 408-615-3000 as soon as possible but no later than 48 hours before the scheduled event.
Overall Sentiment
Bharath Pandravada
Location:
Submitted At: 4:29pm 04-25-23
We live very close to the proposed site and I strongly oppose the Benton shelter project in Santa Clara. There are definitely better alternatives to help the homeless than building a shelter in this location. With so many schools around, it could have negative effects on safety for children and neighborhood as a whole.
Please take our concerns into account and reconsider this proposal.
Ying Xu
Location:
Submitted At: 2:16pm 04-25-23
This is a huge safety issue for our neighborhood!
I STRONGLY OPPOSE building a homeless facility at Benton!! shiqi deng
Location:
Submitted At: 2:07pm 04-25-23
I am a resident of Santa Clara city, and I am strongly against the Benton&Lawrence shelter. This will pose a high risk for our community and especially to the children's safety as the shelter is close to several schools near that area.
Tina Tian
Location:
Submitted At: 1:57pm 04-25-23
I live on Benton, one block from the proposed shelter site. I strongly oppose this proposal as it will make our neighborhoods not safe anymore.
Thomas Posey
Location:
Submitted At: 12:25pm 04-25-23
I strongly oppose
Xiaolan Yang
Location:
Submitted At: 12:20pm 04-25-23
I am a resident of Santa Clara. I STRONGLY OPPOSE
faina kantor
Location:
Submitted At: 8:54am 04-25-23
I am writing to express my strong opposition about the Benton proposal for a low barrier homeless shelter. The homeless shelter will bring to our neighborhood drugs and related crimes, vandalism.
It is deeply disappointing that the city council has chosen to ignore and misunderstand our community's concerns.
Sandrine Basin
Location:
Submitted At: 9:57pm 04-24-23
Hello, I'm living in Santa Clara with my family. I oppose the Benton Low Barrier shelter. We need more mental health facilities and treatment to support the homeless, not more housing.
Haiying Wu
Location:
Submitted At: 9:12pm 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this Benton Low Barrier shelter. LifeMoves and the city only care about the money. They don’t care about our community. They put us in danger.
Megan Katz
Location:
Submitted At: 8:29pm 04-24-23
The new proposal is horrible. It keeps no-screening procedures but plans to put innocent kids next to sex offenders and people with drug addiction, just in order to get a high score for funding. LufeMoves put kids in danger on purpose and ruin their entire life! Shame on LifeMoves! Sarah Foad
Location:
Submitted At: 7:51pm 04-24-23
I'm in strong support of building interim housing at this site.
Greg Dacosta
Location:
Submitted At: 5:08pm 04-24-23
Strongly oppose this project
Puxiao Han
Location:
Submitted At: 12:00am 04-24-23
I strongly oppose this proposal as it will make our neighborhoods not safe anymore.
Sheng Liu
Location:
Submitted At: 10:27am 04-23-23
Hi, I am Sheng Liu, living in Santa Clara with my family. I oppose building a homeless facility at Benton.
April 25, 2023
1 2
Lawrence-Benton Ho
Project
Proposed Homekey Interim Family
Housing Development on CountyOwned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street
Considerations
• 3-way Letter of Intent with
LifeMoves and County
• City co-sponsor for Homekey
• City contribution toward funding
City Council
Meeting
RTC 23-272
Public Hearing RTC 23-272
Proposed Homekey Interim
Housing Development on
County-Owned Land Located at
Lawrence Expressway and
Benton Street
April 25, 2023
POST MEETING MATERIAL
1 April 25, 2023
3 4
Lawrence-.Benton Homekey Project
Project Description ,, .... • Site Area: 1.3 acres
• 30 Family units with kitchenettes
and bathrooms R
• Priority for Santa Clara, Sunnyvale
• 3-story
f: •
• Transitional housing
• Support services t
• Outdoor recreational area '
• 52 parking spaces
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Project Design
• Residential scale ~
and style
• Building
articulation
RTC 23-272
4 2
April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
5 6
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Prop~sed Financing ~ $34M Construction
• Sobrato Philanthropies: $5M
• Project Homekey: $22.5M
• County: $6.5M
Proposed Preliminary Financing~ $3.75M Annual Operating Cost • Project Homekey: $4M
• County: $9.2M
• LifeMoves: $7M (will match up to $7M oflocal funds)
• City of Santa Clara: $1.5M (using PLHA Funds)
• TBD: $SM (Potential sources: LifeMoves, PHLA, Special Revenue Fund) 5 Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Background - City Actions
• July 13, 2021 - City Council study session on Project Homekey • August 24, 2021 - City Council study session on Homelessness / Direction to apply to Project Homekey for transitional housing site • November 9, 2021 - City Council study session/ direction to staff to continue to work with LifeMoves to identify a site within Santa Clara • April - October 2022 - Homelessness Taskforce identifies need for interim housing within Santa Clara
• January 10, 2023 - City Council direction to conduct outreach and explore interim housing at the Lawrence/Benton site 6
3 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
7 8
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Background - County Activity
• November 2021 - County Board directs County Office of Supportive Housing (OSH) to identify potential sites for interim housing in proximity to services and to work with local jurisdictions to bring forward projects
• OSH identifies Lawrence-Benton site as potential interim housing site • Fall 2022 - LifeMoves and Sobrato Philanthropies approach County with proposal to build interim supportive housing at Lawrence-Benton site • January 2023 - April 2023 County outreach activity for project Lawrence-Ben
Site Context
• Adjacent to:
- creek channel
- church
- roadways
• Proximity to:
- single-family
- multi-family
- commercial
7 4
April 25, 2023
9 10
Lawrence-Benton Home
Site Context
• 0.50 miles (13 minute walk) to:
- Bus lines on El Camino and Homestead
- Commercial services
- 5 schools
- 4 daycares/preschool
- 1 park/ playground
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Community Outreach
• January 23, 2023: City Council Study Session on Housing Element • February 13, 2023 : Virtual Community Meeting
• March 1, 2023 : In-person Community Meeting
• March 9, 2023 : In-person Community Meeting
• March 22, 2023 : Virtual Community Meeting
• Mailed Notices (1,000 foot radius) + Social Media
• County Website: https://osh.sccgov.org/project-homekey-scc/benton RTC 23-272
1 0
5 April 25, 2023
11 12
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Community Concerns
• Why this site? - land use compatibility: schools, over-concentration, etc. • Safety and security
• Impacts on property values
• Parking impacts
• Site operation and monitoring
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Considerations
• Need for interim housing
• Present opportunity
• Financial viability
• Land use compatibility
• Community concerns
RTC 23-272
11 1
2 6
April 25, 2023
13 Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Modifications to the Project
Original Concept
80-100 Units (124 Units at 3-1-2023 Meeting)
Singles and Couples
4 Stories
Current Proposal
30 Units
Families
3 Stories
Kitchenettes in Units
24-7 Professional Staffing
Community Advisory Committee
Single Point of Access
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Next Steps
• Resolve $6M operation gap
• County Board of Supervisors Oease agreement, funding, letter of intent) • Submit Project Homekey application to State HCD
(project will proceed only if Homekey funding is awarded) • Ministerial building permit process
• Homekey Capital must be spent within 8 months of date on award letter RTC 23-272
1 3
• All construction must be complete within 12 months (possible 7 month extension) • Full occupancy within 15 months
14 14
7 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
15 16
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Recommendation
1. Authorize the Office of the City Manager to negotiate and execute a three-party letter of intent between LifeMoves, County of Santa Clara, and the City of Santa Clara defining the roles and responsibilities for the financing, operations and construction management for the Homekey application for the property located at Lawrence and Benton Street in a final form approved by the City Attorney.
2. Adopt a resolution authorizing the Office of the City Manager to apply for, execute, and submit all required documents for California Department Housing and Community Development Homekey Program to participate as a co-applicant.
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Recommendation ( continued)
15 3 . Authorize the County of Santa Clara to update the City of Santa Clara's Permanent Local Housing Allocation 5-year plan by adding activity six to the County's PLHA plan to assist persons who are experiencing or at risk of homelessness and allocating year 3,4, and 5 funding, after deducting administrative costs, to the Benton/Lawrence interim housing to help fund operations. 4 . Provide direction to return to City Council for approval of a budget amendment appropriating up to $5,500,000 from special revenue funds for operations at the Benton/Lawrence interim housing site.
16 8
April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
17 18
City Council
Meeting
Public Hearing RTC 23-272
Proposed Homekey Interim
Housing Development on
County-Owned Land Located at
Lawrence Expressway and
Benton Street
April 25, 2023
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Comparison of LifeMoves Homekey Projects
Santa Clara San Jose Palo Alto
30 units 204 units 108 units
All families All individuals 64 individuals/44 families $7M City (PLHA + SRF) $27M (+ Land) City $9M ( + Land) City $7M LifeMoves $9M LifeMoves
$15.7M (+ Land) County $4M County $7M County
$5M Private $5M Private $5M Private
$25.5M Homekey $45.7M Homekey $26M Homekey 1
8 9
April 25, 2023
19 20
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
999 Hamlin Court Shelter (Sunnyvale)
• Owned by County
• Operated by HomeFirst
• 125-bed congregate shelter
• Meals, showers, sleeping mats, laundry,
to-go food packs
• Referral services
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
:i. U"lts per ''1-\oe(,..le.''
Modulo, Pion, I \ h mlly Unit with kllth•n1U11- Fltxlbll Oi1c:k-10-0Ie:k. Module Unit N1t11n:J77sf , ., ., ,. I ,, ,
I " ·1 1 · i- l I = ~JI
t I' -= • .:;:;:., , 1111
e..-te,;or l:>DOt'$ ' I
6 per "10<.l.,.fe >< 15 "lootulet. ~=E~ ~~ ' :h •
r f ,~ ,__;.-11 :o. - I
''I-I--"--' ... .. ·,.;.,,. ~
RTC 23-272
20 10
April 25, 2023
21 22
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
3590 Benton Street Neighborhood
'" ••
- IMIO-W~ ·+· c:::J c.,,,.,,-u ..... ........,
® ..-~ ...... ~
@ .,._ .... ,.,..,...,.1....,(.,...,.,,._l
@ ..-.-...,~~t-(N- Q ,-.,1,(-......w«•·-1-.a.. ~.~
--
• ... .,.,, q °""---"'~ ~'
It) ~-_,., .. _ ~ .., --- u..•uie.......,_. .,
"' -...... ., tt~ .. , ~,.....,.,
.... .,........ ... .,.._ .... ....,. , ... - ..,.,N .. ___,,..,. - .,_.v, .. ..,..,__ fl- 1 ..,.,. • ....,, ...... ,.._ Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Tran sportetlo n
Ulltllll
- lme.-tcfl!JJ..t
c:::i c,y,1 ...... 0..-.,.,
" ... .,.. • • •• IIV",-~•W.-l!ili\llk.-
~ ...,.,,._,..,~Nt,t,t Mw lll 1nil,u o..N IN ,t,
c:::.J ...... ,,.4 .... i;ud .....
RTC 23-272
2 1
2 2
11 April 25, 2023
23 24
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Prox imity to
schools, daycare,
parks, playgrounds
l.tillilll
-
c:::J (_~fflifl',b~(n.Atiry '"°"" ... ~
~W0'.11
N-1~1;.tvd
• ~Atll.,..k'-'
• ........... 9 .,.,...,,,...,..
CV
® ~l\11,Cf'! --~ c-..-, ...
.,, _,_ ,
~ .. -....-..-
~«-Al
Ill Ctu'11
Cl _, tie,i1.t.•'dfwiJNH ....
tc ii."- ,,,,,...,._,,..."' - ~ lflrnl,Mo..indfw_,,
r7 t.All/'mltMOJ!ldhtiw
Lawrence-Benton Homekey Project
Near by I nterim/
s upportive Housing/
Em ergency Shelt er
.l.lg.trul
- )mt,K11111i(rwt
c::J U,,dsw.&t ~
® C........Uttow,Vw'n5'1ftWf
@ W..\W.tllf\til.9'~~1(~,...111)
® ~'M.MNfflf~ 4.~lii!IWl'IMt
® :'~~Mt>,:r..,.OM!n)"7
• ••• 11'1(,fff'C,-"1,"'l'Oll,llo .... ~
r, l!Jhtlj4 1Mr~w.Jlhit~t.
M~l/1' ,..,.,.-,...-.JltwW
f:"'1 M!twJJ• Mh~llw~
RTC 23-272
2 3
2 4
12 April 25, 2023
1 2
-
COMMUNITY PLAN
TO END HOMELESSNESS
-
··-SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
...... Temporary Housing & Shelter
PEOPLE ASSISTED
15, 124 People Placed in
Temporary Housing & Shelter
EXPANDING OUR SYSTEM
Temporary Housing 8c Shelter Capacity
! 15'4•in<•J•n. 1. 2020 'j : 1,. • ..., ...... ,,,,,...,.
2.1 58un,u ~
Breakdown by Typo
1,093
I 513 348
■ 204
B1111 f\
-~ -
I=--,
Shohor lnton'm S.,fo 0th<, Hou~ns, Port.iog
Ulilll41ion R, 10,
91% 79% 82%
RTC 23-272 COUNTY PRESENTATION
Address tho root c11usos of
homolossnou through syste m and
policy ch;ingo
:Kpand homolossnoss p rovo ntlon and
housing programs to moot tho nood
Improve quality ol lllo for unsholtorod
Individuals ond croato healt hy
nolghborhoods for all
TEMPORARY HOUSING & SHELTER
NUM8eR Of l'eOl'lE SEIMO IN CYl0l2
BYlEMl'ORAR'/HOIJSING TYPE
EXITOtlTINATIONS FOR PEOl'LE ENROlUO IN 1£MPORARY HOOS~ G PROGRAMS, CYIOll ~ ~IM\
Houlilg
llllll
l:m
~ s.,/t
P.wU,g
1:-.
Othtr
1,ll4
•.116
I OKUMd ~ I KIU~,,....blli:libw.
~- ~1~11-Nrt ~-
l.lM
""'
1119
""'
~
""'
464
..,,
POST MEETING MATERIAL
April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272 COUNTY PRESENTATION
3 4
HEADING HOME CAMPAIGN: CORE STR ATEGIES
Goal: Achieve functional zero for fa mily homelessness by 2025 Housin Placements & Inflow Anal sis
Ch11rt 1: F11milies with Children Monthly Housing
Pl11cements
-
I -
Chall 3, Whoro do you sloop 111os1 froquonlly?
(Fainlly Homolou Inflow Ocl. 2021 lo Doc. 2022)
o,
sHmtu
OVIOOOSII 1--===:::::IICIIOI
I
'
'
'
'
Chari 2 , l ovol of lnlorvonllon for Homolou
Family Inflow
.. ..- 1n1., •• ntk,n
ln"9',76,7Y•
llnpkl 't~~
rtory,. 502,
'""
Chari 4, Average Days from First Family
VI-SPDAT to Pormoncnt Housing Referral
II.I 9-1,0
-
o,no1a 10OCUOl 91'0OCJ'J:020 10 ocr 20)1 10 OCT 2012 10 UPI 2019 UHl02D HPr 2021 &!'1 20n fH 2023
2 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272 COUNTY PRESENTATION
5 3
April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272 LifeMoves Presentation
1 2
POST MEETING MATERIAL
1 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272 LifeMoves Presentation
3 4
2 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272 LifeMoves Presentation
5 6
3 April 251 2023 RTC 23-272 LifeMoves Presentation
7 4
April 25, 2023
1 2
Agenda
Part I: Community Sentiment
Part II: Project Evaluation
1. : Environmental Impacts
2. : Neighborhood Safety
3.: Location Concerns 2.4:
Site Specific Concerns
5. : Fiscal and Developer Concerns
6. : Credlblllly and Accountability or the County and LifeMoves Part VIII: Alternative Plan and Benton Proposal
Part IV: Conclusion
RTC 23-272
POST MEETING MATERIAL
1 April 25, 2023
3 4
RTC 23-272
Part I: Community Sentiment
5293 wet signatures from local residents strongly opposing Benton project Part I: Community Sentiment
Participants in Community Meetings
• 80%+ strongly oppose Benton
project
• Project supporters include
professionals from housing advocacy
organizations who do not live In the
neighborhood
nne•·((www •ewlYPt comfwf1cb?v-LWdCfJaooHa
2 April 25, 2023
Part I: Community Sentiment
Hundreds of local residents protests against Benton project at Earl R Carmichael Park, Mission City Church, and Santa Clara City Hall.
RTC 23-272
bllPJtftt>Yrt Y9MM19 G9rnt«MIGbzY-QEOX•Yif9M• bllP1·1Jwww Y9YIYbO com/wat,n7Y• ZgY8mUCrEO0 5 6
Part II
Project Evaluation
3 April 25, 2023
7 8
Part 2.1
Environmental Impacts
Environmental Impacts
• High Density - up to 248 people on 1 acre land
• Increase in foot traffic at this busy intersection (Lawrence, Benton, Floral Vista)
• Increase in vehicle traffic
• Increase in parking
• Waste Management
• Bioretention Compliance
RTC 23-272
4 April 25, 2023
9 10
Part 2.2
Neighborhood Safety
Neighborhood Safety
HOMELESSNEH IN SANTA CLARA - CV 2021
769 ltldlvlduah "oflllloted" with th• Cl1y ol $cw,.la Chua • a?V, with ••rlou, ptlyllct.l a, manl(II heahh <0ndlffon1 • .,O¾ <hronl«III:, hom•l•n Cdl1obl•d Of\d IIMOU1ed 12+ rtHK1ttul • 34'¼ have e.11pute nc:e of dom•1tlc "l~l•h«I tH t1allkltln11 •1 •iwnMld Typ•
-
10 . ........ ,o.,
·- -·-o.•~·
•v-t...., ... •• Ol'tt1, ..
"Low barrier entry ... we prefer to take, to be honest, the more challenging elements of the population•
- Brian Greenberg, LifeMoves
Low Barrier Entry
• Criminal background
• Serious mental problems
• Drug addictions
Understaffed police force
RTC 23-272
5 April 25, 2023
11 12
•
Neighborhood Safety
Public Safety Data on Milpitas Homekey Project
Total police calls Increased by 300% In 2022
Councllmember Chua and Vice Mayor Carmen Montano challenged Consuelo that lhe county had changed the admission criteria without Informing the city, and their scroonlng process Is not ~ - Zfploc bags of meth were found on site .
Problematic tenants and drug addictions were not likely to bo removed from the site due to State law. • Only 1 O MIipitas homeless live within the 132 units apartment. $0f,1"f '
o No staff onslte lo repair elevator, fire alarm, smoke detector, etc.
o Tenants from the business park next door "were leaving, and tho business owner p ut the property on sa/9 because of tho negative Impacts from HIilview Ct "
~
llh too, ..... 9Mlr'!rlfPl~«fltOA#SUR4rtlH& a.t,1rl1 t J7 oo -~•rl• "' 00 Neighborhood Safety
Public Safety Data on Milpitas Homekey Project
• As of November 2022:
o Striking crime rate remained
o Councllmember Karina R. Dominguez (who Is the lnlllal supporter for lhls project) visited the site one day prior to city's scheduled check, and commented angrily: There was no 2417 security, no one there checking-in visitors ... carpels and restrooms are so dirty In t/1e 2nd and 3rd floors ... no eviction for crimes, ''These need to be addressed lmmcdlatofy."
• As of February 2023: o MIipitas requested additional police officers to be funded by County since August 2022, but has yet to receive a response from the County.
o Disabled occupants are stuck due lo broken elevator for at least 8 months. "ll goes down at least once a week•, said Reeve, one of the residents.
"Tenants are afraid for their lives." - Karina, councilmember "People are afraid to come out of their rooms. I don't
leave my room without an open knife,"
,
~
.. ~, - Reeve, resident of 1000 HIiiview Ct ,,,n, .,w ~1.r.mt-1 Nffl Mt 11Dlr1mlA&urU,1:10Nln:IIMbtCkAM4:titYitOC4Mottsf:ml~rr,t;IZ4HlU' RTC 23-272
Total Events:
Past 3-Years
0 Doell nol lndudct Polf'DI Choclo, ovtmls
,o 43.3 • Avonago numbar of CoN• fDf
Sorvk:a for /\ugual lhrough Oetvbor
"When compare the crime statistics,
Hillview Ct wlll outpace any apartment
complex In the city of Milpitas."
• Jared Hernandez, Milpllas Police Chief
"Screening process needs to improve.
Because obviously the residents you
are selecting are committing crimes."
~IHNlih/tlHllh
"'°"'" .. Weffa190h1"'
Othtr
- Carmen Montano, Mayor of Milpitas
Com'!Wttf.111 kit•IYI 1'1111,.._,._, k11'-nt, f6Llnd'"l)pany, Qra,,4 lt,ef\ ftetty lheft, F1~1,WpuH .. 1 tk,11n ,-Vt ~~;-:~~ rJJ!~r.·:~n,...n'dll, IN>IM9
oi.o,~., (oomb&Nd•~\t. t.~ fluht. muu¢. ,-iu~i.o,, Ul'\known, W.ISW,1'1) Cor\VO''tO luo,1~, ppta,_.k,>rl, t °'HM kn M' 111•,
UMH1iwl'"II~•
lukld• . AlMifltlltd ~ . Mf"!ltllyd-,1N11f.,.;I pen&WI, f'offft,II d .. (I t;(iCf)'
::za~t~:~-:•:::::r.==~ lvtflj;jg~
t,I\Wlapal bod• Wlfatl0t1, VIII!~ WUt~. VICll1t»n of p,~ordaf, w.~~-Tfflm,,haunt ,. .. ~Aullll "'tflh 0.-""/ WNflOO, a11ti~, R "'t,lNl'ltll, Qont<ffi,o.,.tMir,cot, Al"""P,.-S~rl.Je, HGn"'1'-J•. HAIP+, Cfll1.willf'IQ
---
NIOI\, ,1tv4'~ 5-., fttlf, ,-atn,ty H~•ttJAlKl.,., l.Jtiuo, L•wt. ~n•, 01mbUno. DUI. TrelPIM, Pil!Wlllu,""""-1 Nol1•.Aco'cltM. V<t,~. ~ttt'11, Cc>u1l111 l •r,y .. Q.t f"1"'1t,w,,1C11>41tyi~ t:,llt t HilnQ " ~• n~"'h• MA, Vailod-Jffl, COUit Ord...- \11..1...,_. 6 April 25, 2023
Neighborhood Safety C.WK.tMHT~UMID
'TYPIOfCA&L
!UMlibotty
to t.n•rt
H l lU"
JD.SDOffl4nk~eMe
Public Safety Data on UfeMoyes Mountain View • LS Dlt;w,''"'°' 4U DHIJIThfHl1 TYPE OF CALI All
LlfeMovcs Mount111n View le horn Incidents
Month 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Grand Tot•_!
l 9 10 19
11 12 2<I
3 4 s 4 11 11
s 4 14 18
6 l1 12 23
7 11 u 23
8 15 13 28 g 19 23 42
10 2 12 21
11 9 7 16
12 13 l8
141 I __ 3_1
G11nd Total 3 94 22
Significant increase
13 Neighborhood Safety
Public Safety Data on Bella Vjsta
29 incidents at or next to Bella Vista since ,._
Jan 21. Majority are drugs/narcotics,
vandalism, assault, ca r break-Ins.
Note that the Bella Vista interim housing
was opened in February 2023.
....,., .... -- ._...,, ... -- ......... ,---
.......,. __ ....,.
-·- ... ,..__
14 ----·
,....,.l.-,,1 .......,.._ __ ,_
•«--" ~-.-....
a,;11\t-• .. --.,--
--.-......... i-,u.1111.1
2U
.. , Gtwlhtf't
... ,t,tyTI>tf\
11,tJ l),vl',kl,\l'\blc
IOll-c.n
lOUi\ltrm ,ou~,o•)lbfy lOUMhlltlf;htlOf\
lOH,W11lll•l'ISIOfl
llHS<Jl9kfootWlhk»
UUAc.cU41"1
unc,,sw,
IOHUlfltnVtNdt
.. ,. 7V
AIC
"" CML
CIWI
"'"" fDA.m
F111llHIO
, .. , FOUNO
'" Ill
11/FO
HUN
..
"'""" SP[CIAl.
'"''"' WHOO<
c,.,n.-.
_...,._,.,,. 1an1:111f1M1U
..... _ ..... ... , __ 1.i.-..-..,,11 ...
_ ---•....- __ , __
w ....
"" tOH IDlO ton
"
..
If
..
.. .. -... ~ ... ~-
_.,t._...,~u.. .. t.-.-1
J,1•t~1oool..-@ooot
__ ,_ .... _..,, _,l-haOlaoOl-,l•-
M .. { ...... W-°"""~ -1
_ .. ,_""~ ... "'"'"
RTC 23-272
JOU: IOl:l&MMIITOUI
I
' 1
" ,.
I
I
" , .. • "
"' u ...
7 April 25, 2023
15 16
Neighborhood Safety
Public Safety Data at Five San Jose sjtes
Ms. Consuelo Hernandez cited a news report by
KQED that complaints are down after interim
housing sites opened (ref: third community
meeting)
It was misleading because
• None of the S sites are In residential areas
• Data was skewed by only one site
o Number of calls Increased for 4 sites
• Data showed the longer a site has been open,
the more crim es it generates
• Changes in types of crimes
tiurnberaf CallJ In Vtu 81fart/Aftu lnlerlm Hou1ln1 $11.t Optned ~1w,y11,.(.,..,,•t1•••· 'ou1
U it Ii Jil H
••run.
\woU..IMM+~l'IIOIIIW\toe,°'9.l' V'~l o/ .. Jlti,IUuhdMMdH,r,J<NttrlorNI U'\IUI CNlt,VJJJf!A<hrf",..f">'W:Qffl
Part 2.3
Location Concerns
RTC 23-272
8 April 25, 2023
17 18
Location Concerns - Land Purpose
ABC Tree Farms
IOlllij T
2,500-3,000 local families visiting
each year for community and family
events during the holiday seasons
Mon. /\pt 3, 2:20PM * ~ Reply
Thank you for your email. We have approximately 2500-3000 local families that visit us each year at the 3590 Benton Street, Santa Clara. CA location. We love being a part of Iha community but because we lease these spaces, we unfortunately do not have much control otherwise.
Location Concerns - Schools
•
•
The county failed to show any research on impacts
to this neighborhood. Using schools as an example:
o 02/14/2023: county and Lifemoves knew
nothing about how many schools are In the
vicinity
o 03/02/2023: the county said there were only
4 schools within in 1.5 miles. This is MQ!lg..
o 03/09/2023: the county showed only 6
schools and 8 daycares within 1.5 miles . .s.t.lll
~ - 15 schools (10,483 students) and at least 31
daycares within 1.5 miles of Benton location; og
other Santa Clara communities have such a dense
concentration of schoois. kho«• e o.yu,eCM~ • s,nlot~, • ,.,,,, Md lww Cen,., RTC 23-272
9 April 25, 2023
19 20
Location Concerns - additional
• Distance to Job Opportunities: no proof this location has more job opportunities • Distance to Transport: El Camino bus corridor, located 0.9 miles from the site (-18min walk for healthy adults without bags etc.)
• Distance to Supportive Services: lackofeasyaccesstolocationsfor transportation, healthcare, food distribution, government benefits, and support services • Liquor Store: across Benion
o Proximity to Bella Vista Interim Housing: less than 0.5mile • Similar Project Location: commercial/light industrial Part 2.4
Site Specific Concerns
RTC 23-272
10 April 25, 2023
21 22
Site Specific Concerns - Site Design
• Fence Design: a fence on the creek side, but lt is unclear if fences will also be installed on the other three sides of the site, and what type of fence will be used.
• Entrance: There is no clear information regarding the number of entrances to the site and whether they will be controlled. • Parking: It is unclear whether the 80 parking spots provided, which include the parking lot for LifeMoves staff, will be sufficient for a maximum of 248 residents.
• Building Height: There is confusion regarding the number of stories the building will have. In the first and second community meetings, LifeMoves stated the building would be 4 stories, but in the fourth meeting, they claimed it could be 2 stories. Meanwhile, the Notice letter sent by the City of Santa Clara stated that the building would be 3 stories.
Site Specific Concerns - Onsite Policy
~REA 3: SAFETY ANO SECURITY
. 8Mi}rARS'M\W OICOHDlA811lll0WID
. MIS'$~' •• , All.QWID RN
• tBffll7~~8&14?t'' emu,, qmum o•
• AISOWTUY NP UIUALIIAWSMINT•
· W8~W~ffll:'&llt'"!IYI
· W81$HUSJ&ff."'"" '" •HX "'ro•1•acvmu
· ffli\1,Ed%RWAl'ii"itt'ffliN!"'"
Slide from tho lhltd ccmmu11/ty moolln.9
Detailed policy is not provided:
• Screening process is unclear
• Eviction policy is unclear
• Curfew policy is unclear
• Guest policy is unclear
• Drug policy is unclear and drug
test will be petiormed
• etc
Multiple sex harassessment incidents happened
at LifeMoves MTV, but the sex harassers were
not evicted.
RTC 23-272
11 April 25, 2023
23 24
Part 2.5
Fiscal and Developer Concerns
Fiscal & Developer Concerns - Funding and
Operation
• $3.3M - $4.3M estimated annual operating cost
($55k per person): yndear funding source from
year 1 to year 15+.
• A psychiatric unit requires a minjmum 1 :6
licensed nurse/patients radio, 24 hours a day
by California law. Yet LifeMoves recommends
only ONE vocational nurse for 200 unscreened
homeless tenants, where 57% have serious
mental issues.
RTC 23-272
12 April 25, 2023
25 26
Fiscal ft Developer Concerns: Evidence from
LifeMoves Palo Alto
• LifeMoves' Palo Alto project cost estimate
increased from $17.6 million to $26 million, just
two months after its approval, and then
skyrocketed to $34.4 million within a year of
approval.
• LifeMoves is remoyjnq 24/7 security and ~
supportive services in order to cut $2 million cost
• LifeMoves is also planning to shrink spaces for
families, dining and common area, reduce common
bathrooms, and fiw.ci. • The City of Palo Alto confronts a $6 million funding deficit, covering only construction costs
and not accounting for the annual recurring
operational costs that will persist year after year.
SIMlrl:•
tlP#>eK<ffll"ID"M'Onomd~
~~Ml>-~~~~
Part 2.6
Source of Funds for
Capital cost
Hornekey
Sobrato
Total received
Eslimated construction
cost as for March 2023
Construction cost gap
Arnount
$21,732,228
$5,000,000
$26,732,228
$34,400,000
$8 mlllon
Credibility and Accountability of the County and
LifeMoves
RTC 23-272
13 Apri l 25, 2023
27 Credibility and accountability
• Though the county and UfeMoves had multiple opportunities, they consistently provided tw or misieadjng jnformatjon. A fact-check list is provided in the next slide.
• County also invited housing advocacies who don't live in the neighbourhood to speak in support at all four community meetings.
• Also 300+ questions from the community are still not fully answered.
RTC 23-272
Credibility and accountability • County and LifeMoves consistently provide false and misleading information Topic Quostlon/Concorn County/LlfoMovos said ... Fact Chock Taf1111nology counl)I Md llfoMovo, "Sheller' 11 an old model. which 11 lololly d~roraol rrom 11Ghallor"and "lntorhh/tupportlvo housing" oro uaed In1erch11ngtl\bly In pnovldod ro1, o ond 'lnlcrtml•uppcrtlvo ~oualng• that Donton 1, propc,ed pul community mooting, by Conouolo. Tho.,. tM ••mt thing, moaning mlslnfomu1tlon ond Intend 10 ror. tho target populallon 11 homat111 ind ontlle suppor11'tlo Hrvlco WIii bo ml1lo1d lho city and tho pro hl .
communll)I 1000 Hlllt.1low Cl. Mllplla, Is a pa,manent au1,por1lva ou ng.
Gufoty Impact on Clfmo roto, or Con1uoll) 1Ald OI) dAIII hQYO showed cir1ma would > 300¾ lncreaao In pollct call• al and uound Mllpllo ' 1000 Hlllvlow Ct ,orvlce cells on tho ,110 or !nCfease In and neor the shellar Apnrtmanta; Con,uelo 1tlend1d lht mHUng end ac:know~dg•d lh• neighborhood 1lgr11Ucant crJm111.1rs••
Sol•ty Number of Schools Ne:afby Fl.-.1 llmo inow nolhlng about numb•r•I school, HI •ohools wflh 10,'83 studen11; Second llrno countod Ollly ~ wi!hln 1,5 inllo, Al loa•I )1 daycorOI wllhln 1,0 mllu Third tlmo mli$Od all tho oehools we11or lawronco
suraty Podoslrtan aaroly concarn No one wlllwelkpoaalng bylhe locellon, H lhoro I• no Pednlrl n p.alh1 In ewry lr c:tlon . Regul11r root trattic lrom ramlllo1, palh o,olloblo rorwalklno put II, aanlora, coupln with atrollor1, and udonts on waokdayc:1 and woekonda.
S!UdQnl& fn,qua11lly vls!t tho 711 acr0111 Benton ror 1nnck1.
LocoUon Proximity lo Grocery Wn1kJr,g d l1IMCO lo necosallh)'I 0.9 mllot or minimum 18 mlnu111s walk to not1ro t gro4c>:!')' locnUon Proxlmll)I to Health Sotvlc11 Kalm loolo .. by Kalaor req e■ ln11ur11ncoj Only 1m11rgonoy nrvlco.s without lnsuranco Location Local Homolou f olk• Hometo11 lndlvlduols oro already pruont In tho oroa, ,Allocallon b11ed on qu uo, no guar•nlao of houslns, SantA Clan·• Wo l hOUld provide lh•m wlin , holler here. hom1tlOH In lhl• sholtor; Mllpfl.1, faclllty d:ala ahowa only 10 Mllp1ta1 homtfHt In 1;}2,.unh 1paruntnt: 11 of 1022, two yoara 1fnco Its l•unoh, o,,ty 25 outol 2l'4 hom•l•u In Mllpllu l\.tvt bun hou .. d Locotion Proxlmlly 10 bus Olop Public lron,port•!lona r, vary clo•• by Tho 0l01a1iU buo atop (1 an El Carmina & Honduaon, 1 mllaa away from Iha Benton locatlon, a.nd 21 min walk,
Locmlon Pro,lmlt, 10 llq\lOr . ,. ,. Ignored I\CtOH lhl . ,, .. 1. Ro ou h show• th.U poopfo With ment:al 111110110& who rroquontly conau;r11 .tlcohol upotlonco woraonod 1ymptom1, ludlng to nn lncrn11d propon, Hyfor vlofonco 1r,d arlmln:at bahavlar. 28 14
April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
29 30
Cred1b!llty and accountability • County and llfeMoves consistently provide false and misleading info (con't} Topic Question/Concern County/LlfoMovos said •.• Fact Check Oa\a on County ond UfoMovos MTV', homeless number droppod bocauso or tho Mountoln view city'• homoloss numbor dropped: Is bocouse or tho homoloss provklod rolso 6nd sheller bulll now RV pnrklng rostrlctlonl numttor misinformation and lmond Arter Mounlaln View banned ovorslzod vehlctos from parking on lhe to mislead tho city ond tho majottty or city ~troots In 2019 and began enforcing lhoso rulos In 2022, community Lieber apoculatod, some or Mountain Vlows homoloss populalion mey hava 1elocotod to oroos thot aro more lax aboul RV atroot pe,~lng.
Data on Impact on crime ratos or Consuolo sllod KOEQ'• maws that complalnls aro Thal statomonl Is very ml,leadlng. First, nono of tho nvo San Joso crlmo rate service coils on tho silo or down artor lnter1m housing silos openod. silos In !hat nows oro In tho rosl<lonll•I nroo, They ell In lnduslrlol nolghbOfhOOd area. Sacond, t110 l>nr ch•rt In tho prosontotlon shows t110 lolal number for all the ~ . bOClluGo ono Glto Is much larger lhan lhe _i_,. __ ........,_,_.,. __ olher lour so It skows t110 ovoroge, If you mtor by silo•, you will nnd ~ out of 5 •lt•s havo lncroosod crilno numbers conrp,rod with baforo _,. ,.. __ thoy wora opon. This data also didn't take Into account many typos or --- ctlmo, such ao vlolonco, drug-relaled, rnon101 dlGordorod, lholl and felon crime. So to •um up, tho dota supponers provided In racl rs oxoc11y ·- --- conslslonl with lho mllpltas Interim housing data wo found, wt1lch Is tho :::.:- crime rate 1rlpled alter lhe site openod. Tho ctlmo mto Is unaccepleble .. . . . ---. - ·- -----·-
Credibility and accountability
Failure to Fulfill Commitment: Evidence from LifeMoves MTV • 2nd lowest successful rate
o 281 clients exiled the program between its oponlng May 2021 and September 2022, only 73 individuals, or 26%, were placed In permanent housing, the 2.ru[ lowest rate of succossful oxit in lhe county.
• Dlsquallfled management and staffing:
o Former client physically assaulted by the nrst program dlroctor In 2021, there Is still an outstanding arrest warrant for the director
o A former client reported multiple soxual harassment cases; however, the second site director cannot remove the harassers due lo LlfeMoves' policy against relocating drug addicts from the site unlil they conquer !heir addiction-a real lhal Is nearly Impossible in 90-120 days.
o Shuffled al least 3 directors within only 1.5 years of operation • Services are missing:
o Multiple clients never received specjaU~ed support in searching for housing o Shortage or case managers, housing speclallsls; no licensed nurses (only Interns), • Crimes to the nearby business:
a Testimony from nearby business has reported burglaries and lltterjng jssuos.
Consequently, they hired a 24/7 security guard al their own expense. o MTV has added dedicated police force lo patrol al Iha site.
Sourr:o: ~~JJ)»~WPl'MHM: llr'R,,,,,.,..,eCb:OPWm~~
MPMYbt'AAIW&-1:flldl.ftl"W,l,0}®""1~b:t.1t!tO'Pl!V1I fttbtiPhlCZNMM:lilrlil:ltf:iWJHIOY~t~W! ~ Ufemoves MTV has the
second lowest rate of
successful exit, 26%.
The other shelters ahead of
Lifemoves range from 41% to
70% of clients moving into
permanent housing. Many
returned to street and
chose not to extend the
contract with Llfemoves.
15 April 25, 2023
31 32
Part VIII
Alternative Plans and Benton Proposal
Opposite to what we have been stereotyped and
misunderstood as "selfish house owners", our
empathetic community cares a lot about homeless
people and truly want to help. We will never
surrender to sacrifice community safety, yet there are
alternative plans we will consider. Alternative plans
that will end in a win-win situation.
RTC 23-272
16 April 25, 2023
33 34
Appropriate locations
• We have so far Identified several
lands that is convenient to job
opportunities, facilities and
transportation.
• The City and County should
continue their search for suitable
land if pursuing interim housing
remains a goal. Do La Crui Blvd & El Camino Roni,
next to Senta Clara Polle• Station,
os an oxpanslon to the oxlstlng
supportive housing fdClllty
Parking Lota nt Lo~l·s Stodlum
Sovon fonds at lntoraocllon or
South Bay Fwy, Gold St, &
Lafayette St.
Contra! Expy & San Tomas Expy
What could be considered for Benton land?
• Proximity to schools makes this site a potential good fit for "rent-to-own" affordable housing for teachers who have
a livelihood in or around Santa Clara.
• This "rent-to-own" affordable housing could also consider law-abiding families, whose members do not have any
substance abuse or criminal records, have good credit
scores and jobs to afford rent.
RTC 23-272
17 April 25, 2023
35 36
Part IV
Conclusion
Conclusion
• The city should vote NO to this project
• Neighborhood strongly oppose this project
• Site evaluation shows serious concerns from multiple
perspectives including environmental, safety, fiscal, etc • Alternative sites should be identified and evaluated by the County and LifeMoves
• SafeSCC proposes rent-to-own affordable housing for
teachers and law-abiding families
RTC 23-272
18 Apri l 25, 2023
1 2
Santa Clara Housing
Advocates
We support low-barrier interim
housing in our neighborhood
A GRASSROOTS COALITION OF NEIGHBORS IN SUPPORT OF THE
PROPOSAL FOR LAWRENCE & BENTON
REASONS TO SUPPORT
Direct evidence from data, research, and personal experience
SAFER FOR EVERYONE
THE KIDS ARE ALRIGHT
GOOD LOCATION
LIMITED NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT
LOW BARRIER IS EFFECTIVE
INTERIM HOUSING WORKS
IMPROVED HEALTH
POSITIVE IMPACT ON MENTAL HEALTH
•Additional informalion on website, supported by over 100 I isled sources
DIVERSE GROUP OF RESIDENTS
EFFICIENT USE OF MONEY
PRIVACY & DIGNITY
BUILDING COMMUNITY
ADDRESSING SYSTEMIC FAILURES
SOCIAL & RACIAL JUSTICE
INCREASING CITY & COUNTY NEED
RTC 23-272
POST MEETING MATl:tUAL
1 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
3 4
SAFER FOR EVERYONE
• Neighborhood crime and emergency calls may decrease _,J . ....... , I
• Perception of neighborhood safety may Increase
• Illegal activities will not be allowed ........... ,.. . ._ ___ ___, • Full time staff on site, Including security
• Controlled entrance, nobody who shouldn't be there can get In • Decrease In unhoused people receiving minor citations • Mental Illness Is not dangerous
Nclshbors say that since the navl,aUon cantor opvnad--
M '-hborhood<rlrneh1t.lf-t '"'., I I
p
THE KIDS ARE ALRIGHT
• Parents can use age appropriate language to explain this to kids l l. Uu .. lwlh•r N I 11<•011ll• nrc no 111orc, lihc,ly Ilion t1hl'ht•1·,•1I 1w1i11IP to lirwm t'hlld1•1"11,
• Homeless kids already go to school In the district he \'Ul m11jorit)1 or nclulu who nliu~~ t'hllilrl"n nre in n. i,nt1hi011 or 1ru" t • Engaging people who are different from ourselves Is a good thing fn1111lr memliar, , drl't\', torarl11\•• r1c. Niuety•thrr<• pf<fc(lnt o( d 1ildri:-n ~
•ho nm tOXUl'lly l\ht1,cfl k11ow tlu,llr nlmnr 11l'no11.nll)', ,u.-c:ttrc\mft 10 1lu, 1111u ,Alm"o fli1d l n l·1•N1 NR1lounl N(11worl\ (ll;\Jl'i"N), Tho llQtlon 1lm1 • Teach your kids not to talk to strangers
• Families Included means there can be no sexual offenders 1" 11hout 1HI pc,011ll' 11re1l'11t n grcmt{lr dnnco1 tu 1chookhlM1•c11 thnn 1myone ~ht• iJ fllctun.lly inror-rec•t, 1ticmntiiluu, nml hnrmful. • Unsheltered people are not more likely to harm children I [ 5. Treat people the same way you would want to be treated Otcnslonolly ai,k your <:htld lo
lmbglno 1.Jolng somcono also.
o o, · How would II lctil to ba
I nll llko Joo? •
l ht,. ftt l .1 mllllon public u hool sludenh
In lhtUS U ptrlt"clna homtlt•1nu1,
--e~ ~, ........ ~
--·- ..... ... .-, ... _,..._..,_, -,_,.. . ·---·------- --- ~-- "Empathy is what lays the
fo1111datio11 for ltelpi11i cltl/dre11
live 011c esse11tia/ tn,tl,: I Ve nre
C1ll humans who share the same
fears 011d concems, and dcsen1c
to be treated with dignity. "
- Mlchollo Borba. Ed. D.
" This building Is for people
who don't have a home,
until they can find a home"
"Sometimes bad things
happen to good people or
good people make mistakes"
2 Apri l 25, 2023
5 6
LIMITED NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT
I • People will not have to line up for a spot in the building • Building will look like any other apartment
• In MTV, LlfeMoves has security well outside the building as well • Low-Income housing does not have an Impact on property values • Plenty of parking for residents and staff, many residents do not have cars r M•dlan Homt Values In Son Francisco Ntl1hborhoods
""
JOU IOU
.-
JOH IOU
C, nh~W,ln lronl &
Do~llth
IOM.I
• Ht-1t1tlo,l,(4111t1
O,tlll.flf
Results: Neighbors
Believe Visible
omelcssness has
:->crrr d
'This new housing development, temporary
housing thing, as far as I'm concerned, I
haven't heard a peep out of these people.
This has not been an Issue for us, a problem
whatsoever:
- Rltk 0dt!IO, owntl, Conklin 0101. noo, Cornln91
Affordable Housing In Orange County
The Impact on Housing
LOW BARRIER IS BETTER
M eeting people where they are at- helping those who need It most • Some people are not more "worthy" of housing than others • Supportive services are Included, and very high% use them • Low barrier is proven to be more effective at transitioning to permanent • Housing Improves mental Illness, we can't keep those people out • Low barrier does not mean no barrier: Megan's Law
• Rules that are useful and help obtain housing faster
• Low barrier & voluntary participation builds trust & allows for better results 1,898 people returned
to stable housing
last year
LOW-BARRIER APPROACHES BUILD ON l
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES
Polley Shift
Implement a c risis response that ends the
use of large congregate shelters and
creates dignity-based, safe, temporary
crisis options as a bridge lo long-term
housing.
3 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
7 8
INTERIM SUCCESS
• Registering with the county, staying for seve ral months • Creates an entry point Into system to help get a permanent home • Bridge the gap for people who are in between permanent solutions • More likely to a ccept Interim housing In private units • An important piece of a larger system for solutions
~
••
One solution amongst many
A step on the path to a
permanent home
"Yes, and" approach Sflrvh;("i Elghty-, lx pcr<;cnt or fnmlllo5 nnd 07 percent of single J t1duns who rosldo nt tht> roclllly .succo,srully movo lo per mnncnt hou,lng therealler. The sta,t-up cap1lal costs for Lire Moves Mou11ta111
PROVEN HEALTH BENEFITS
• Unhoused people do not trust systems
• High rates of elde rly, chronic Illness, and dlsabillty • Highest risk people will be given a spot first
• Hundreds die on the streets of Santa Clara County every ye ar • Access to healthcare and transportation to get there
• Access to hygiene supplies, showers, bathrooms
So tho first roaaon why homofounons is a
moral l 5SUO l& that ii retatas lo rnatters ol r1ght
und wrong, nrnllor. rolntod to lolling pooplo
dio,
1 he staggering number of 250 homeless
,..
,.,,
dco1l1s rl.!~ched a new high thi~ year in Sonta Claro ,,.
County. This year saw a 5S%incrcasc from two ycMs ,
ago, a disturbing level compared to 2019 when the
county 11,corded 161 dc.iths, ond 2020 when the
number jumped to I96dNth~.
Health Conditions Among the Homeless Population
In Com arlson to the General US Population
HOMIWS HOU$IO
18" Dl1b1t11 9"
50" Hyptrtanslan 29"
35" H11rt Attack 17H
20" HIV 1"
36" H1p1llll1C
49" Depression
4 April 25, 2023
MENTAL ILLNESS IS NOT DANGEROUS
9 I .
• 40-52 MIiiion adults suffer from mental illness, majority are not homeless People with mental Illness are more likely to be a threat to themselves than others • Only 4% of gun violence is associated with serious mental Illness alone {NIH) • Counselling support w ithin program
• Providing shelter improves mental health
I .
• M ental Illness Is not a moral falling
It is illegal to discriminate against disability
,a
350 million
people g lobally suffer
trom depression.
Among U.S.
ADULTS:
ttttt
1 In 5 experienced
a mental illness
"/ think the most
important thing is to
accept the disorder like
any other medical
disorder; that
treatment works and
that recovery is not
only possible, but
probable as well."
-individual with
schizophrenia
Depression is a
leading cause of
disability worldwide
"REGULAR PEOPLE" WILL LIVE HERE
Santa Clara's Homeless Population Snapshot:
• Older adults
• People with disabilities
• Domestic violence survivors
Families with one emergency
• Former foster youth
• 85% of hom eless individuals lived in Sont;:i
Clara County when they become homeless
• 63% of homeless Individuals arc long-term
residents who had lived in Santa Clora County I
for m ore than 10 years before becoming
hom eless
10 SUBPOPULATIONS OF HOMELESS POPULATION
a
ran,llltt
IA1><'1tn<lng
f-lomeleunna
-
35%
.,, female , ,ocmd•111 1 f 11 1 ,f linvllltJ
pru,1 ,us
ClXfl ri1•11 06 of
Intimate
partner
violence
Youth 6 Young
Mun, e...,,,..t• n<• Ing Momtltun,11
•• •
24• %
1oponNt ,1 hl~1o ry 11, thr
fp r,tN crtrr systc,m
Older Adults In the
Supportive Housing Systeltl
RTC 23-272
5 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
EFFICIENT USE OF MONEY
11 • Santa Clara County already owns the land, making it less expensive • HomeKey Is intended to pay for the first few years
• Building supportive housing saves ta)(payer money on criminal Justice, healthcare, and other services
HOUSING 1000
Pre-housing
$62,473
Post-housing
$19,767
Reduction of
$42,706
For the 103 homeless residents In the tenth cost
decile who were housed through Housing 1000
program, the estimated average annual pre•
housing pubUc cost was $62,473. The estimated
average post-housing cost was $19,767, a
reduction of S42,706 annually.
Even adlllng back In the
costs 01 tile vrogram. th11
coun111 stlll saved more
Ulan $0.5 m1111on.
I
l
§
l
!
[
Study Data Show that Housing l
Chronically Homeless People Saves
Money, Lives I IThe most cost-offoctlvo wny to help the homelellSJ Is to glvo them homos f,_ h ,tl, .. ,_.C•~• I (h•I t • ll 11t' 1, <tt 1,,,.,11-•II,. £ U"J Cost Estimates - High/Median/Low City
11.000
,, ....
IIA<»
,1,.ao
11.lOO
Ol.000
-....
-
"'., " 11 .I J
!
'41p,ort1Y1 ,~u ~ouNng
J I I
' !
PNOn 5tltltff Nt nt.lt HotpltakNplul
• ll'gll D Mtd~n n LOW
GOOD LOCATION
• Grocery stores, convenience stores, parks, hospital, churches • Children can go to school nearby & higher chance of success • County owned land Is less expensive than buying land
• Many other pumpkin patches and Christmas tree farms in sec • Walking distance to public transportation
I • Unhoused people are people, and people live In neighborhoods Average lire expectancy In metro Cleveland,
by Child Opportunity Level
Very low i'2AyH r&
12 0
I I
Queens Pumpkin Patch,
Saratoga, CA
6 April 25, 2023
13 SOCIAL & RACIAL JUSTICE
• Housing Is a racial Issue: disproportionate % BIPOC
• Housing Is an LGBTQ+ Issue: safety concerns & acceptance at home I • mOl¥4t O.-, Co.ri,~ti~•~ t N l'tf'lrtn4,n ,rcw-~
• HUMlb',,tlltt1~ .-4'
IO\
U\ ... •I\ I'\ 1\
• Housing Is a reproductive Justice Issue: maternal health & access to supplies """'' L\,lttl(llc,Of',« h"",., .. 111a-i Alrirflt-"'kM,(• ~
m clcs,nou II c ousod by hl, to,lcot and 1l1uctu,ol opp1onton: Di1c1l111lnolll(\' po,clo1 ond l c rlces In housing. heollh core, voling. employment, c,lmlnol (v1llce. ond e11ewhere hove vonled Afrtcon-Amo~cons lrom bolng rocognlzod 01 full mombcrs of socloly.
Equal Accets Pro11cllona S1111 Nttded lor Gender MlnorlUH Experiencing Homele nea■
Prognoncrre10lod condition$
Sp()Mlll\fOUUbottlon
Hyperttw,IQncoRlJ1i(.ill~g
p,egn:w,cy -
Ur .ntl:U•J f fhll\U,. lt~' llU
Cl19tl\dtrAdu'11
Tr,n19,ncftrAduh.l
63% 1m•,h11lhu111.I
OtndttNo"-CoftfotmlftDAdUllt,
UO"'- un.,l1r lumrl
flrolongodp,•Bl""'Y
01.!fidm<y and onrml,1
Polyh) dram"'••
00 r~ated l•• um.,
N1MHt11 andvom11lng
l ltm0<1h6Udulln3t)<ci;,,;nty iiii....-iiiiiiii--•
E,.lyolllvtatcnodlabot
Abdorf\n.tlpa:,,
Olher comp~tallonsof brlh~lf«tlngn10lhtt 1
~ A!IU.JNJlml
INCREASING CITY & COUNTY NEED
TOTAL flOI.IEl.t U POPIJC.AllOII, I AU rA CLARA
• Wages are not keeping up with Inflation
While the number or
shelter beds available
and people in need or
shelter beds have both
Increased, more
people are in need of
beds than there are
beds available.
• Housing prices are higher than ever
• More families are living paycheck to paycheck
• Growing population and not enough new builds
• County waiting 11st Is months long
14 Figure 1.24 1.5 MIiiion Shonloll of Rontol Unlll Alfordoblo ond Av1ll1blo lo Vory Low, ond Exuomoly Low,lncomt Rontor Hou,oholds In Califoml• 2,500,000
2.000.000
1.!00.000
1,000,000
500,000
0 ltoutt-holdt
r Shoobll Vll
Afford.able Ind •v•ll•ble Ul\lU
ll
I '~ '• 1''1------------1 t I
.. ,
Number of
full-ti mo Jobs
needed to afford
a two bedroom
unit for a fomlly
of four
-t.tt -
,,,
COUIITY
~ .....
o.w, e-u
....
i.t,ft-,ciw,f
.. ,._
&i1.ICl•1
......
-
J009
•••• •••
... •••• ,
••••• •••• •••• ••• ••••
10,028
...,
2022
7 April 25, 2023
DESTINATION HOMl
15 WE WANT THIS • A 1r1nlffont numberol lndlvldu11'dld nol want lhelrn,muor ftculncludtdfor 11f1tv<on(uM ~ a ~ sv@home R .11 :!:::~:.
•
.. f'K Ill ~JY£
BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE
Santa Clara Housing
Advocates
We support low-barrier interim
housing in our neighborhood
16 SOME ANSWERS TO YOUR QUESTIONS
RTC 23-272
8 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
WHAT ABOUT OTHER HOUSING PROGRAMS?
I .• Bella Vista is scheduled for conversion to permanent affordable housing within less than 2 years Civic Center Drive Is an affordable housing development, not Interim supportive housing • White Oaks was rejected
This would be the only publicly funded interim supportive housing facility in the City of Santa Clara
17 ,-
18 WHAT ABOUT MILPITAS?
• MIipitas Is PERMANENT housing, not Interim. Tenants have stronger legal protections, Including privacy • l ntaerim sites allow for thorough Inspections and disciplinary action if needed • LifeMoves rules for Mt. View (see packet) include daily unit inspection, unannounced drug and alcohol testing, required sign In, no personal visitors
9 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
WHAT ABOUT CRIME, DRUGS & PROPERTY?
• Vast majority of published research says NO
• Especially unlikely with resident population of families • Interim housing (vs permanent housing) gives the city reallstlc options for rapid and effective response to Incidents 19 WHAT ABOUT THE FUNDING?
• Home Key+ County+ Philanthropy for construction costs • Land is already County owned
• Anticipated need <$0.4 mllllon from city per year for first 7 years • City and County budgets are not fixed more than 7 years ahead • Expectation that City and County will continue commitments through the lifetime of this faclllty 20 10
April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
WHAT ABOUT COMMUNITY CONCERNS?
At the request of neighbors:
• The target population has been changed to 100% families • Bulldfng height has been reduced to 3 stories
• Slgnlffcantly fewer units
• Priority explicitly given to Santa Clara and Sunnyvale families • Single point of entry with 24-7 access control
• Police Department confirmation of adequate capacity
Proposers have accommodated key concerns and requests
21 WHAT ABOUT THE VOTE?
• Number of unhoused people In city and county is high and growing • Negative Impacts for all In our community
• Current proposal would make a small but significant Impact • One piece of a larger city, county, and statewide approach to addressing complex Issues of the unhoused The moral Imperative Is clear
• This Is your chance to choose to do the right thing for the ENTIRE community • You have a responsibility to all people living in this city, not just the ones currently In homes 22 11
April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
1 2
SafeSCC
Promoting Safe
Neighborhoods
Community Comments to
City Proposal on the Benton Project
SafeSCC
04/25/2023
Vast majority of the residents oppose the project.
SafeSCC strongly urge the City Council vote NO.
2 POS MEETING MATERIAL
1 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
3 4
This is an extremely short notice to the community
City proposal:
• Was released to the public on Friday 04/21/2023 at 5 PM! Community comments:
• This is a new proposal which is totally different from the proposals the community has been engaged with.
• Community needs more time to read and think about it. • Sufficient time should also be given to the city council before they can vote on it.
Site design and operation details are missing
City proposal:
• Details are not included
Community comments:
• Site internal and external design details are missing o E.g. size of each room, arrangement of buildings, site plans, fence, etc • Operation details are missing
o Program guidelines are vague and lacking details
• No mention of how LifeMoves' operation will be supervised o What if LifeMoves failed to accomplish their commitment like that In Mountain View? 3 2
April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
5 6
The "Low Barrier" nature remains unchanged
City proposal:
• Page 5: "Housin<; Rrst principles and a low barrier placement process limit what screening criteria can be applied."
Community comments:
• No matter if it's families with children or singles, 30 units or 100 units, if the low barrier nature doesn't change, meaning no/little background check will be done, the site remains a serious safety risk to the neighborhood as well as the tenants of the shelter.
• This is a major concern from the community.
Site selection neglects neighborhood safety
City proposal:
• Page 7: "the Homekey program is highly competitive and points are awarded to projects that are in proximity to essential services such as grocery stories, health facilities, libraries, pharmacies, and public parks." Community comments:
• The site is selected because of how the Homekey points are awarded. • Neighborhood safety is complete'ly ignored in site selection. • San Jose Branham just started construction last week. No data is available yet and can't used to justify Benton site selection.
5 8
3 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
7 8
Program rules don't consider community safety
City proposal
• Page 9: "Community Guidelines: specific rules around warnings, grounds for program termination, and grounds for immediate discharge including drugs or alcohol on premises, weapons, physical assault or threats of violence, sexual harassment, illegal activities, destruction, vandalism, or theft." Community comments:
• The guidelines are for the Benton site. There is no guarantee that such behaviors will NOT occur in the neighborhood. How can the city prevent crime from happening outside the site?
• If tenants are evicted due to violation of the guidelines, they may stay in the neighborhood and become safety threat to the community.
Tenant placement is questionable
City proposal:
• Page 8: "to place these families with children (999 Hamlin Court, Sunnyvale) at the Benton/Lawrence site and set aside space at 999 Hamlin Court for singles and couples from Santa Clara"
• Page 9: "If at some point there were no unhoused households with children to place, the building would place single clients in dorm style ''flex" units." Community comments:
• This demonstrates rules for tenant placement can be easily changed during operation.
• The site even though proposed as family only can place single clients in the future.
7 8
4 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
9 10
Interim Housing is not effective
City proposal:
• Page 5: "63% of people served by interim housing programs found permanent housing"
Community comments:
For the eight programs in Santa Clara County,
• an average of 44% of people found permanent
housing,
For LifeMoves Mountain View:
• only 26% people at LifeMoves Mountain View
found permanent housing
• Many didn't receive any supportive service and
chose to go back to streets
Unit cost is TOO HIGH
Llf1Mov1111 Mountain Vlaw
'lc:mpu1:'11'j hou~l'II
Ul'lk own a, pl.1ce unr11 for h;1bll111lon
hllPl t&M'< am1r1;nw,1 com'ot't'fl!WllQlQWemwu ror;,nta·o ~1'.Ut-:U!l.ll-40•hr11HWWI 1t1-Cl·tntt·h0d·Jd.lblt-.ttoulfMJ~:.ll11.u :t'J:"4nl"'l·IP'lt•'IHl·m11~t 9 City proposal: Estimated Construction Cost I
I
• Pages 10: $34 Millions to construct 30 Updated Proposal $34,000,000 I I
family units. (30 family Units)
Community comments:
• More than $1 million per family unit without land .
• For LifeMoves Mountain View site, it's < $95k/door with land . • Please breakdown cost estimate to justify .
• What if Palo Alto case happens again here?
10 5
April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
11 12
Ye•r • , .. ,, v .. , 3 Year4
u...-..... u 11-,11•- ktw • • ,.. • ._, ,.f e,..,f,. r-1.- JD I M A. ~ .. -.1 I !IOO ~ ' . • •== Cltv or Sanla c1e,-1011,,n Financial gap is unresolved alM r--itmanl I I • < C: 5Mrvv-1 t !'101& ....... . . . .... , ...... . '"" ""
Tolalo I 2.t'" 11 I 2 974.<U I 3. • 2 719 H 5 .. ., .. •. ...... .. . ~ City proposal: I n ..... raUnn GI S ,o.m rv rn S . ~ ~•• v .. ,s v .. ,o Vear7
Pages 10 and 11: $5.SM Operating Homeko• Ooarallnn SUblldv • Cltv of Sonia CIA,- IPL>1A FUrldtl $ l500 000 $ l500 000 I 500 000 CIIY ol Sonia Clara (OIIJarl
Gap for the first 7 years. LlfaMavH Maleh Commltmon1 $ l500 000 $ 500,000 S 500,000 C<>untv Challanoa Grant S ij21 ij90
Countv tlHAf' $ 968007 S 2088828 S 2 122 874
Toul1 $ 2,189907 $ 3,081,828 $ 3,122,874
•••-Uno ••••o· · .. • . . .... Community comments: I Ooorollnn O•• Ill 000000 111 000000 S'1 000000 • If LifeMoves doesn't fill the gap, city will face $9M operation cost in 7 years . • Homekey requires operation duration for 30 years .
• How is the project going to be operated after year 7? If operation remains the same, there is a significant operating gap for the next 23 years: $4M-$5M/year. • All these fundings assumed best scenario. Who will fill the gap if best scenario didn't happen?
Benton site is similar to White Oak Lane (rejected)
City proposal:
• Page 2: "City Council members expressed concern about the financing gp,p for the White Oak Lane project which could end up needing a City contribution of approximately $14MM over seven years. Councilmembers were also concerned with the shape and orientation of the site in re(afioo to the nearby expressway, and the location which directly faces residential uses on White Oak Lane and Poinciana Drive."
Community comments:
• City council rejected White Oak Lane in 2021
• If White Oak Lane shouldn't pass, why should Benton?
11 12
6 April 25, 2023 RTC 23-272
13 14
Report is full of false and misleading information
• Page 2: City of Mountain View attributes Its 43% decline from 2019 to 2022 to a variety of City investments into homelessness services Including the LlfeMoves Interim housing site.-> True reason 1s MTV star1ed to ban R parkin n streets from 2019 and fully den 1n 2022
• Page 8:The County evaluated sites based on several factors , including lot size, accessibilily for construction equipment, proximity to transit, and access to utilities, medical services, and grocery stores. -> he site Is not clos lo these Jfi!UIU
• Page 6: The proposed site Is vacant land located at the intersection of Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street near the Santa/Clara Sunnyvale border-> Not va<:ant, more Iha 00 families visit ch year for hollda_y alebrallons and used as urc ark Ing eve~ ekend
• Page 6: In addilion, a project that receives funding under Project Homekey Is exempted from local land use authority as well as CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) environmental review. -> C Id not be exempted • 30 units-> 30 modules. 90 families at m g,uld sta more I 0 • Program participants typically stay In Interim housing for three to twelve months depending on their needs while they stabilize their lives and look for permanent housing. -> j:ou a ntiall sta longer • Page 9: "The City's Police Department has confirmed there is not a shortage of uniformed police officers and that the Police Department will be ready to respond if there Is an Increase ln calls for service."-> PD Is unde affed Conclusion
The proposal is rushed, flawed and poses safety and financial risks:
• Short notice to the public
• Ignorance of community concerns
• False and misleading statements
• Missing design and operation details
• Financial risks
Safescc strongly urge the City council to vote NO,
13 14
7 From: Michael Fallon
To: Clerk
Subject: A Neighbor"s Support for Benton-Lawrence Shelter Date: Monday, April 24, 2023 2:07:14 PM
Honorable City SC Councilmembers,
Having co-led SJSU efforts to address homelessness in my capacity as both a Sociology professor and a Director of the Center for Community Learning & Leadership, having associated with Life Moves, HomeFirst, DestinationHome, and Catholic Charities; I am very familiar with the elements and dynamics involved in housing the unhoused. And as a SC homeowner of 140 years in Pomeroy West near the proposed resident cite, I support the proposal that Santa Clara City partner with SC County and LifeMoves to establish this residence for our unhoused neighbors.
Respectfully,
Michael Fallon
1114 Pomeroy Ave
--
Michael Fallon
Lecturer Emeritus, Sociology and Interdisciplinary Social Sciences From: Mayor and Council
To: Mayor and Council
Cc: Nadine Nader; Manuel Pineda; Andrew Crabtree; Adam Marcus; Glen Googins; Nora Pimentel; Michelle Estabillo; Marisa Welling; Stephanie Davis
Subject: FW: For the City Hall April 25, 2023, Meeting Agenda. RE: Proposed Interim Housing at Benton Street and Lawrence Expressway
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2023 3:21:17 PM
Attachments: image003.png
Dear Mayor and Council,
Our office received the following correspondence regarding the Public Hearing/General Business item:
Consideration and Possible Actions on a Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on County-Owned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street, Including City Sponsorship and Partial Funding of Project Operations (CEQA: Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects), which we are forwarding for your review and consideration.
Please note this correspondence will form part of the public record for the April 25, 2023, Special City Council meeting.
Thank You,
Melissa Lee | Executive Assistant
Mayor & Council Offices
(408) 615-2252 | www.santaclaraca.gov
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2023 8:56 AM
To: Mayor and Council <[email protected]>; Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: For the City Hall April 25, 2023, Meeting Agenda. RE: Proposed Interim Housing at Benton Street and Lawrence Expressway
Dear Mayor Gilmore, City
Councilmembers:
We strongly OPPOSE the low-
barrier interim housing
proposed at Benton Street &
Lawrence Expressway for the
following reasons.
I urge you to immediately vote
NO on any and all upcoming
proposals/projects associated
with homeless shelters at
Benton Street and Lawrence
Expressway.
A) What is the successful rate
of the homeless people who
entered the shelter and later
found permanent housing?
According to statistics from
the two nearby locations, MTV
and Milpitas, the homeless who
entered these facilities and
later found permanent homes is
less than 20%! That is less
than 1 out 5 successful rate.
Where do the other 4 homeless
go? This is clearly a waste of
tax dollars! Creating so many
problems for the surrounding
neighborhood for such meager
results. I would rather give
each homeless person the full
amount of funds per head count
that is needed to operate such
a shelter. We need to work on
improving the failing existing
homeless shelters before
building more of them.
Repeating a failed model will
only result in failure. Let's
work on improving the existing
shelters first. Are there any
plans to improve the outcome of
the two existing shelters,
before we build more? This
proposal will create much more
problems than it tries to
solve.
B)The homeless people who don't
find permanent housing and who
are at the end of their
“interim” stay are going to be
forced out of the shelter.
They are going to congregate
near the shelter site, thereby
impacting the immediate
neighborhood. It will only get
worse as time goes by! There
will be more and more homeless
in our neighborhood. This is
not solving the homeless
problem. It is just dumping
the homeless, and issues that
come with being homeless in our
neighborhood. We must stop
this from happening. What is
the County's plan to mitigate
this problem?
C) If the "interim homeless
shelter" is a drug free
environment as stated, what
kind of medical help is
provided for the 200+ persons
homeless at the shelter? We
can't expect a drug addict to
become clean on the day he/she
moved into the shelter. If
he/she can not find immediate
help at the shelter, he/she
will be doing drugs on the
street near the shelter, in
nearby parks, at the school
yards, in our neighborhood!
With the shelter's plan to
admit the "most challenged
homeless", there got to be a
high number of doctors and
nurses on site to meet the
challenges. Many homeless
people also have mental issues,
that is just a fact of life.
Will the County provide enough
specialists on site to help
these homeless people with
mental issues? How many
doctors and nurses does the
County plan to assign to this
shelter full time?
D) If as proposed the "low
barrier interim homeless
shelter" will take on the "most
challenged homeless”, what kind
of security force does a 200+
persons homeless shelter come
with? One clearly would
expect a higher ratio of
security force for the "most
challenged homeless". A 20
person security force (a one to
ten ratio) may or may not be
even enough to handle the
situations that surely will
arise. Does the County have
done any study on this matter,
and will the County provide the
dedicated full time security
personnel's?
E) A homeless shelter is not a
jail. Thus the homeless are
free to go in and out of the
shelter, as I understand it.
And keep in mind these are the
"most challenging homeless".
200+ “interim homeless shelter”
residents will be out doing
their “business” and wandering
around the immediate
neighborhood. With the
concentration of 200 plus "most
challenging homeless", many no
doubt with drug additions at
this location, drug dealers
will be attracted to come; it
is well documented a
concentration of homeless
people will attract drug
dealers, as in Tenderloin, San
Francisco. How many additional
police officers are assigned to
this precinct, dedicated to the
“low barrier interim homeless
shelter?
F) What does Santa Clara County
plan to do at the end of a
homeless "interim" stay, when a
homeless person does not find
permanent housing? Does the
county have any plan to bus
them back to where they were
found? Or the county just let
them out and hope for the
best? Where does the county
think the homeless will go?
The answer is very obvious.
They will just walk into the
immediate neighborhood, OUR
neighborhood, and be homeless
again! Does the County have
any busing plan to move the
homeless to where they want to
go? Does the County have the
funding dedicated to deal with
such a large army of homeless
people concentrating in our
neighborhood?
G) This proposed location has
been used for community
activities for many many years,
such as pumpkin patches,
Christmas tree sales, and more.
Where will the thousands of
local families go for these
kind of activities if the
County takes away this lot by
inserting a homeless shelters
here. What will the County
provide as an alternative for
the local families? Why can't
the County find a Win Win
solution for both the homeless
and the residents of Santa
Clara County?
In summary, the Benton Street
and Lawrence Expressway
location is absolutely wrong
for any homeless housing.
In light of the the above
unanswered concerns, we
encourage that the City of
Santa Clara vote NO on the
proposed homeless shelter at
Benton Street & Lawrence
Expressway.
Sincerely,
Alex B. Huang
City of Santa Clara Resident
From: Mayor and Council
To: Mayor and Council
Cc: Nadine Nader; Manuel Pineda; Andrew Crabtree; Adam Marcus; Glen Googins; Nora Pimentel; Michelle Estabillo; Marisa Welling; Stephanie Davis
Subject: FW: Letter of Support for Transitional Housing Date: Sunday, April 23, 2023 3:22:10 PM
Attachments: Transitional Housing Support Letter City of Santa Clara.pdf image003.png
Dear Mayor and Council,
Our office received the following correspondence regarding the Public Hearing/General Business item:
Consideration and Possible Actions on a Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on County-Owned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street, Including City Sponsorship and Partial Funding of Project Operations (CEQA: Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects), which we are forwarding for your review and consideration.
Please note this correspondence will form part of the public record for the April 25, 2023, Special City Council meeting.
Thank You,
Melissa Lee | Executive Assistant
Mayor & Council Offices
(408) 615-2252 | www.santaclaraca.gov
From: Lawrence, Alicia <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2023 9:58 PM
To: Mayor and Council <[email protected]> Cc: Gheyszada, Nurges <[email protected]>; Kreeger, Martha <[email protected]>
Subject: Letter of Support for Transitional Housing
Please see the attached letter.
Thank you!
Alicia G. Lawrence
she/her/hers
Communications Director
Office of Senator Aisha Wahab
1021 O Street, Room 7330
Sacramento, CA. 95815
Direct: (916) 651-4430
April 21, 2023
Mayor Lisa Gillmor
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
RE: Proposed Bridge Housing Community on Benton Street at Lawrence Expressway Dear Mayor Gillmor and Members of the Santa Clara City Council, I strongly support Bridge Housing Communities (interim housing) as an essential step in creating the kind of solutions to homelessness in our state that reflect housing as a human right. Speaking as a daughter of refugees, a former foster child, the only renter in the California State Senate, and a hardworking professional living in the Bay Area; it is the high cost living in the Bay Area and the profound lack of affordable housing that is a primary cause of homelessness in our communities.
Housing is a critical issue as the number of families without a home increases and available housing seems to shrink. The complexity of this issue requires solutions that must include legislation to tackle the causes of home loss and housing opportunities that meet the needs of our entire community— including Bridge Housing Communities (BHC) and permanent affordable housing units.
Santa Clara’s Proposed Bridge Housing Community on Benton Street at Lawrence Expressway is a critical component of our overall solution. This project—like the Housing Navigation Centers in Fremont and Hayward—allows clients an opportunity to live in safety, providing supportive services, time and the stability required to work toward self-sufficiency with the goal of finding a permanent home. Our unhoused community members deserve and require this type of structured support to recover from the trauma of living on the streets without housing.
I would like to impress upon you all that BHC programs are working with those who have very few options and are at highest risk for unrecoverable outcomes Bridge Housing Communities provide short term housing in a dignified non-congregate setting, which allows privacy and personal responsibility. The few months in which individuals or families reside within these communities without being in “crisis mode” can provide the safety, resources, and support that allows clients to care for themselves and their families again.
When implementing strategies that provide interim and permanent affordable housing solutions, it is critical we plan for and consider that there may be situations in which no housing is available to clients upon program completion. Our programs must be suitably robust to ensure clients are transitioning into housing and not back onto the streets. Interim housing provides that crucial “middle step” between living in crisis mode on the streets for a limited period of time while seeking permanent housing.
The Bay Area is one of the most unaffordable places to live in the nation with the available supply of affordable housing units far lower than the number of community members who need those housing units. I commend the City of Santa Clara and Santa Clara County’s commitment to end homelessness and the progress that is being made to combat the causes of homelessness.
Sincerely,
Aisha Wahab
California State Senate, 10th District
From: Tom MacDevitt
To: Clerk
Subject: Agenda item 23-272
Date: Monday, April 24, 2023 9:27:56 PM
Attachments: Screen Shot 2023-04-24 at 2.40.50 PM.png
Screen Shot 2023-04-23 at 11.42.25 PM.png
*I'd request you to add this document to the agenda for the meeting on 4/25 regarding Lawrence/Benton Homeless Shelter*
Despite staff assurances, this project is not exempt from CEQA under section Fwd: (CEQA:
Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects) because of section 65913.4(a)(6)(G)
"65913.4.
(a) A development proponent may submit an application for a development that is subject to the streamlined, ministerial approval process provided by subdivision (c) and is not subject to a conditional use permit or any other nonlegislative discretionary approval if the development complies with subdivision (b) and satisfies all of the following objective planning standards:
...
(6) The development is not located on a site that is any of the following:
...
(G) Within a special flood hazard area subject to inundation by the 1 percent annual chance flood (100-year flood) as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. If a development proponent is able to satisfy all applicable federal qualifying criteria in order to provide that the site satisfies this subparagraph and is otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this section, a local government shall not deny the application on the basis that the development proponent did not comply with any additional permit requirement, standard, or action adopted by that local government that is applicable to that site. A development may be located on a site described in this subparagraph if either of the following are met:
(i) The site has been subject to a Letter of Map Revision prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and issued to the local jurisdiction.
(ii) The site meets Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements necessary to meet minimum flood plain management criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program pursuant to Part 59 (commencing with Section 59.1) and Part 60 (commencing with Section 60.1) of Subchapter B of Chapter I of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations."
Section 60.3 (b)(1) states:
Require permits for all proposed construction and other developments including the placement of manufactured homes, within Zone A on the community's FHBM or FIRM;
Section 60.3 (b)(2) states:
Require the application of the standards in paragraphs (a) (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of this section to development within Zone A on the community's FHBM or FIRM; Section 60.3 (a) states:
(a) When the Federal Insurance Administrator has not defined the special flood hazard areas within a community, has not provided water surface elevation data, and has not provided sufficient data to identify the floodway or coastal high hazard area, but the community has indicated the presence of such hazards by submitting an application to participate in the Program, the community shall:
...
(2) Review proposed development to assure that all necessary permits have been received from those governmental agencies from which approval is required by Federal or State law, including section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, 33 U.S.C. 1334;
3590 Benton has been designated by FEMA to be in a Flood Zone A, which is defined as a 1 percent annual chance of a flood (100-year flood) .
This information of the Fema classification is on the City's own flood map (attached screenshot).
It is frustrating that city staff appear to be attempting to be misleading when it comes to the information in the agenda report for this meeting. I will send a separate email about other misleading statements in the agenda report.
Respectfully,
Thomas MacDevitt
i loadsmartgov/,all abou - laod maps
u nfa... UI FUppling San Mateo Cred · ... Bo ol<s- - 5mools Bay f ederal Redwood Cre ir LI .,.. Cl) Travi!S i FF 40 ,K , Comptr,o ier ,esys u• " Homepa,g~ I Va lley ...
EMA
D Buying a Policy v Renewing a P',olicy v F1tood Risks and Costs v 8,efor,e and .~fter a f1lood v Food Zones and , ps v ec your , ome an 1nanc1a, secu ,y.
What ar,e the m1oderate- to low-risk & high risk
fl.ood zones?
■ Mode a e- to ow-nsk flood areas are designated with th,e letters B, C, and X on FEMA flood maps. In t i · ese areas., th1e risk of bemg flooded is ed ced, but · ot compl tely emoved. One in three insurance claims ,come, from moderat, - to ow-risk flood areasA
■ High-risk f ood ,areas begin 1th the letters A or Von FEMA flood .maps. These areas face the highest risk of flooding. If you own a property 1n a h1gh-r1sk. zone and h v,e a. federally bac , d mortg ge, yo11 are _g__ ur d __Q__iJUrc · ase flood msurance as a cond tion of hat oan. 290 .. 22,.154
Paree Number: 290-22-154
City: Santa Clara
Council □-s rim: District. 4
General Plan; Very Low Density
Residential
Zo11i rig. R 1-6L - SI ngle Family
Lot Acres: O~ □ 1
Lot Dimensions:
Year B L.l)i It:
ote.l Un its-: O
Total Bedrooms:
Total Bathrooms:
Number o,f Stories: □
Office· Square Feet: O
Garage Type:
Garage Spaces:
Primary School: Santa Clara
Unified
Hrgh School: Santa C Iara Unified
Flood Zone: A
Annual Clean-up Campaign: City of
Santa. Clara. Your tiome does not
qualify for the Annual Clean-up
L
+
Ill
From: Tom MacDevitt
To: Clerk
Subject: agenda item 23-272
Date: Monday, April 24, 2023 10:39:56 PM
*I'd request you to add this document to the agenda for the meeting on 4/25 regarding Lawrence/Benton Homeless Shelter*
There is a misconception perpetuated by the County of Santa Clara staff that a use permit or licensing is not needed for this project. On the Santa Clara county office of supportive housing website, there is a separate tab describing the Homekey project proposed at Benton and Lawrence. In their FAQ section it states that:
"...state law deems Homekey funded projects consistent and in conformity with any applicable local plan, standard, or requirement, and allowed as a permitted use, within the zone in which the structure is located, and shall not be subject to a conditional use permit, discretionary permit, or to any other discretionary reviews or approvals (Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 50675.1.1)."
Reviewing this section of the law reveals that:
CHAPTER 6.7. Multifamily Housing Program [50675 - 50675.15] ( Chapter 6.7 added by Stats. 1999, Ch. 637, Sec. 2. )
50675.1.1.
(a) Notwithstanding any other law, including subdivision (b) of Section 50675.1, funds appropriated in the 2020 Budget Act or an act related to the 2020 Budget Act, including, but not limited to, moneys received from the Coronavirus Relief Fund established by the federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act (Public Law 116-136), to provide housing for individuals and families who are experiencing homelessness or who are at risk of homelessness, as defined in Section 578.3 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulation, and who are impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, shall be disbursed in accordance with the Multifamily Housing Program, including as grants to cities, counties, and other local public entities, as necessary, created by this chapter for the following uses, consistent with applicable federal law and guidance:
...
(g) Any project that uses funds received from the Coronavirus Relief Fund for any of the purposes specified in subdivision (a) shall be deemed consistent and in conformity with any applicable local plan, standard, or requirement, and allowed as a permitted use, within the zone in which the structure is located, and shall not be subject to a conditional use permit, discretionary permit, or to any other discretionary reviews or approvals.
A review of subdivision (a) of this section of code, does not list construction of a shelter as one of the options, therefore this licensing exclusion does not apply.
In the Homekey Program Notice of Funding Availability, Round 3, the source of the Homekey funding is explained on the cover page:
“Of the $736 million in Homekey funding, $435 million is derived from the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSFRF) established by the federal American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) (Public Law 117-2) and $301 million is State General Fund. The $301 million in State General Fund money is intended to supplement the acquisition of, and to provide initial operating subsidies for, Homekey sites to promote Project feasibility.” These funds are not related to the 2020 Budget Act so this exclusion from the need for a transitional use permit also does not apply.
This exception to use permits is therefore not covered by this section due to these two separate circumstances.
The need for a use permit and licensing by the state will greatly change the scope, design, timeline, and operating expenses for this project. This proposal should be reworked and resubmitted so this project can be in compliance with the safety rules and regulations of the state.
Regards,
Tom MacDevitt
From: Tom MacDevitt
To: Clerk
Subject: Agenda 23-272
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 9:18:55 AM
Attachments: closet walking bus stop.png
actual distance.png
crow flies.png
*I'd request you to add this document to the agenda for the meeting on 4/25 regarding Lawrence/Benton Homeless Shelter*
There is a lot of misleading information presented to the council and the public in regards to this project. Here is what I have noticed which is not an exhaustive list.
Problems with maps provided by staff:
Map symbol of a market across the street, which is a 7-11 convenience store. The map key refers to this as a "food area". The criteria for a Homekey project is that a market sells staples, fresh produce, and fresh meat. This gives the impression that there is a grocery store close to the project.
Size of map symbols placed on map make it appear that public transit stops are within .5 miles, when they are not. See attached google map screen shots for actual distances (2640 feet is .5 of. mile). The provided closest walking map is also wrong. See attached screen shot for actual closest walking distance which is down Lawrence Expressway. measuring the route that staff claims is revealed to be about 80% longer than the claimed half a mile.
The Bill Wilson transitional housing on Shafer Dr was left off the map describing other housing projects in the neighborhood. This house is 300 feet away from the site. This gives the impression that the neighborhood will not be oversaturated with housing projects.
In the 23-272 agenda, city staff calls out that the project is not in a flood plain when it is.
In the 23-272 agenda, city staff calls out that the project is within .5 miles of. a bus line, when the criteria for Homekey is within .5 miles of a bus stop. This gives the impression that this project complies with this Homekey qualification when it does not.
Regards,
Thomas MacDevitt
Carot111e', Place ~ rJ
a
i
S<Jpe, '<Yo-Po Plaza 9
tftcn,M,. ,,..-:«..,,.ss
Mff.tw, dittattq,
""cltaou...,.,,,.•<klrol'o.., .. ,h
Tora, dlsrance. 4,S.i88 h (I 38 Ion/
--
l'n t1tr1eFree
l" Ub,a,y *71 OEs s,-,.,o,
VlstaPomre
9 l,OQ)oo ,r
C.:a,01,,ie•s Piece ~
,.
i
R "
"' 11.!!J
l
li'
S<J1><, '<Yo-Po Plo,a 9 O chMfi< .,. Kor.., . ss
Hidd,
Mt.tJur•dlat1~
~Oflfhtrn.ap,o~,o~_,.th
ro..,.,.,_ '-'60.e.h(e.1.s,m)
BfOoJi:i111•or
..
j
q
w.,,,.o, 9'
9s,
9 High
;, '-..i,..., ..
.:
e
e
From: Mayor and Council
To: Mayor and Council
Cc: Nadine Nader; Manuel Pineda; Andrew Crabtree; Adam Marcus; Glen Googins; Nora Pimentel; Michelle Estabillo; Marisa Welling; Stephanie Davis
Subject: FW: For the City Hall April 25, 2023, Meeting Agenda. RE: Proposed Interim Housing at Benton Street and Lawrence Expressway.
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2023 3:21:16 PM
Attachments: image003.png
Dear Mayor and Council,
Our office received the following correspondence regarding the Public Hearing/General Business item:
Consideration and Possible Actions on a Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on County-Owned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street, Including City Sponsorship and Partial Funding of Project Operations (CEQA: Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects), which we are forwarding for your review and consideration.
Please note this correspondence will form part of the public record for the April 25, 2023, Special City Council meeting.
Thank You,
Melissa Lee | Executive Assistant
Mayor & Council Offices
(408) 615-2252 | www.santaclaraca.gov
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2023 9:42 AM
To: Clerk <[email protected]>; Mayor and Council <[email protected]> Subject: For the City Hall April 25, 2023, Meeting Agenda. RE: Proposed Interim Housing at Benton Street and Lawrence Expressway.
Dear Mayor Gilmore, City Councilmembers:
We strongly oppose the low-barrier interim housing proposed at Benton Street & Lawrence Expressway.
We urge you to immediately vote NO on any and all upcoming proposals associated with homeless shelters at Benton Street and Lawrence Expressway.
The success rate of LifeMoves’ shelters is only 26%, this is absolutely a waste of our funding.
They lack qualified staff and nurses to operate their existing shelters even though the shelters have not reached their full capacities . Even with full funding, LifeMoves can not provide qualified service and enough staffing for their existing shelters, so how can they operate more, new shelters? Without solving the problems with the existing shelters but rushing to construct another new bigger shelter will only make the problems worse. We are afraid the proposed Benton and Lawrence Homeless Shelter Plan will be another non-successful project by LifeMoves, the residents of the City of Santa Clara will suffer for years to come as a result.
There is another shelter with a full capacity of 536 people per year in the City of Santa Clara approximately 0.5 miles from this location. The existing shelter is far from full yet, why is there a need to build another bigger shelter in this area? Why does the City of Santa Clara and it's residents have to shoulder so many of the homeless shelters? We the residents of the City of Santa Clara have done more than our shares in helping the homeless people. Let's spread the love all across the State of California; Stop the proposed shelter at Benton and Lawrence.
If the interim homeless shelter is a drug free environment as stated, what kind of medical help is provided for the 300+ persons homeless at the shelter? We can't expect a drug addict to become clean on the day he/she moved into the shelter. If he/she can not find immediate help at the shelter, he/she will be doing drugs on the street near the shelter, in nearby parks, at the school yards, in our neighborhood! With the shelter's plan to admit the "most challenged homeless", there got to be a high number of doctors and nurses on site to meet the challenges.
Many homeless people also have mental issues, that is just a fact of life. Will the County provide enough specialists on site to help these homeless people with mental issues? How many doctors and nurses does the County plan to assign to this shelter full time? A homeless shelter is not a jail. Thus the homeless are free to go in and out of the shelter.
Hundreds of “interim homeless shelter” residents will be out doing their “business” and wandering around the immediate neighborhood. With the concentration of 300 "most challenging homeless", many no doubt with drug additions at this location, drug dealers will be attracted to come; it is well documented a concentration of homeless people will attract drug dealers, as in Tenderloin, San Francisco. How many additional police officers are assigned to this precinct, dedicated to the “low barrier interim homeless shelter? Does the City have founding to increase the permeant police officers number? The Benton Street and Lawrence Expressway location is absolutely wrong for any homeless housing.
We encourage that the City of Santa Clara vote NO on the proposed homeless shelter at Benton Street & Lawrence Expressway.
Regards,
BB Huang
City of Santa Clara Resident
From: Pilar Furlong
To: Clerk
Subject: Letter to Council Supporting Proposed Homekey Development 4_25_23 council meeting Date: Thursday, April 20, 2023 5:50:33 PM
Attachments: image001.png
image004.png
BWC letter of support for HomeKey 4_25_2023 council meeting.pdf Dear Mayor Gillmor, Councilmembers, and City Staff,
Attached please find Bill Wilson Center’s letter of support for the proposed Homekey development at Lawrence Expressway and Benton that will be discussed on April 25 at the special Council meeting. We will also be submitting an e-comment if that option is available, and attending either in-person or virtually to voice support of the project.
Thank you for considering the needs of those in our community who are unhoused, and need a helping hand to regain self-sufficiency.
Pilar Furlong (she/hers)
Chief Community Resources Officer
Bill Wilson Center
408-850-6132
[email protected]
www.billwilsoncenter.org
Pilar Furlong (she-her)
~ .. ~ ' ' ..
I -,;·Bi 11 Wi Ison Center (OJ~
April 20, 2023
Mayor and City Council
City of Santa Clara
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Dear Mayor Gillmor and Members of the City Council:
3490 The Alameda
Santa Clara1 CA 95050
(408) 243-0222 tel
(408) 246-5752 fax
www.billwilsoncenter.org
Bi ll Wilson Center is submitting this letter in support of the proposed housing development to be located at the corner of Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street. Bill Wilson Center has been providing shelter and support for homeless youth in the City of Santa Clara since 1977, and we are grateful to the City for your continued support of the young people we serve.
Santa Clara County's Community Plan to End Homelessness (2020-2025), which the City of Santa Clara endorsed, outlines three core strategies to guide the work needed to be done to end homelessness. Strategy #2 is to expand homelessness prevention and housing programs to meet the need. The 2022 Santa Clara County Homeless Census and Survey reported that homelessness In the city of Santa Clara increased by 35% from 2019 to 2022. Santa Clara's own Un housed Task Force reported that Santa Clara does not have enough interim housing for unhoused people. The City of Santa Clara clearly has a need for more shelter to assist people trying to get off the streets and into safe, stable, secure housing.
The City's 2020-2025 Consolidated Plan, and the 2023 - 2024 draft Annual Action Plan, both set forth goals to increase housing for all income levels, and to provide supportive public services. The proposed Homekey development wil l do just that.
By providing 80 - 120 Interim housing units that are near public transit and provide on-site supportive services (including case management to help with linkages to employment resources, education, and health care), homeless individuals and families can have a safe place to stay whi le they rebuild their lives.
The City of Santa Clara has a time limited opportunity to partner with Santa Clara County to develop much needed interim housing through a Homekey grant from the State of Cal ifornia. The unhoused in our community need a helping hand.
They need their city to step up and assist them with resources to help them get off the street and into housing.
We urge you to support this proposed development which will help the City of Santa Clara move forward with meeting the goals outlined in the Consolidated Plan. Bi ll Wi lson Center's vision is to prevent poverty in the next generation by connecting youth and fami lies to education, employment, housing and positive relationships. We are working toward ending youth and family homelessness, and we are proud to be doing this work alongside the City of Santa Clara.
Sincerely,
Josh Selo
Chief Executive Officer
~-,--
1 'K' Bill Wilson Center
1973 - 50 YEARS - 2023
Counseling • Housing • Education • Advocacy
From: Chandra Maddipatla
To: Clerk
Subject: Comment for Agenda item #1 on April 25 Santa Clara city council meeting Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:55:57 AM
Respected City Council members,
I live less than 1000ft from the proposed interim housing at Lawrence and Benton on Golden State drive. I strongly oppose low barrier entry interim housing at Lawrence and Benton. It is going to make the neighborhood very unsafe. The authorities and involved officials of city and county haven't been able to come up with a concrete workable plan to ensure safety of the peaceful neighborhood. This housing is going to increase the crime rate significantly and make lives of everyone around the neighborhood miserable. Please do not build the low barrier entry interim housing at Lawrence and Benton. It will ruin the peaceful neighborhood permanently.
Instead, please consider using it for building permanent housing for low-income city or county employees.
Thanks,
Chandrasekhar Maddipatla
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Guangchao Yuan
To: Clerk
Subject: For 4/25 council meeting on Benton project (Item #1) Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 12:13:17 AM
Hi,
My name is Guangchao Yuan, and I live in santa clara (95051) with my family.
We strongly oppose the proposal of building a shelter at Benton. We appreciate that you could hear the voices from the people living in the community.
Thanks a lot,
Guangchao
From: Mayor and Council
To: Mayor and Council
Cc: Nadine Nader; Manuel Pineda; Andrew Crabtree; Adam Marcus; Glen Googins; Nora Pimentel; Michelle Estabillo; Marisa Welling; Stephanie Davis
Subject: FW: Benton Proposal Review
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 9:49:24 AM
Attachments: image001.png
Dear Mayor and Council,
Our office received the following correspondence regarding the Public Hearing/General Business item:
Consideration and Possible Actions on a Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on County-Owned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street, Including City Sponsorship and Partial Funding of Project Operations (CEQA: Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects), which we are forwarding for your review and consideration.
Please note this correspondence will form part of the public record for the April 25, 2023, Special City Council meeting.
Thank You,
Melissa Lee | Executive Assistant
Mayor & Council Offices
(408) 615-2252 | www.santaclaraca.gov
From: No Homekey in Birdland Benton <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2023 9:50 PM
Subject: Benton Proposal Review
Dear Santa Clara Mayor and Council Members,
Thank you for the opportunity to conduct an initial review of the fourth proposal for the Benton and Lawrence Interim Housing project.
We kindly ask you to address the following questions prior to voting on the proposal:
1. The proposal is asking the City of Santa Clara to spend a minimum of $500k of its PLHA award plus $500k annually to fund a building that will not address the City of Santa Clara's homelessness issues.
Please describe how the city will fund services that address the existing homelessness in Santa Clara, including mental illness, drug/alcohol addiction, and unemployment of unskilled workers with or without criminal records? How will this project remove homeless individuals from Santa Clara parks, creeks, and vacant buildings/lots?
2. The addition of the Benton Lawrence County interim housing project will INCREASE the City of Santa Clara's homeless population by bringing families and individuals from elsewhere in the county (Current County Homeless Population: 65% in San Jose, 3% in Santa Clara).
3. The proposed approach has been failing to decrease homelessness in SCC and SMC. Homelessness increased in SCC by 3%. How will this project be better than other similar projects?
4. The proposed approach does not address primary causes of homelessness and does not provide sufficient skilled staff to treat a population including 60% with mental or physical disabilities, 30-80% with drug/alcohol addiction, or a myriad of other medical issues brought on by being unhoused for an extended period. Case Manager minimum requirement is a high school diploma. What sort of support can be expected? How will one Licensed Vocational Nurse manage the medical needs of 30 families? Can college interns provide the appropriate level of treatment for psychiatric or personality disorders?
5. The proposed building site does not provide access to jobs for unskilled labor. What is the plan to increase job opportunities and easy access to mass transit?(0.7 miles is too far for a family to walk to a bus route)
6. The proposed project is not exempt from CEQA as it is not 'Affordable Housing'. If you disagree, please provide the specific clauses from SB35 and AB140 as well as Homekey documentation. When do you plan to conduct the appropriate environmental impact studies so that the surrounding residents may be more accepting of a proposal?
7. Evidence shows Homekey projects are not reducing homelessness and are creating issues for surrounding neighborhoods, including business and residential. How is this proposal different?
8. How will the city protect the surrounding residential neighborhoods from off-site drug use/dealing and other crimes?
9. What criminal background checks will be used to verify there will be no sex offenders, arsonists, or individuals with existing arrest warrants among tenants?
10. This property is very small and the construction costs of $34 million plus annual operating costs of $3 million to house 30 families is not effective use of Federal, State and local tax revenues. What other county properties and models were evaluated and what are the details?
11. The City of Santa Clara has placed several homeless shelters/interim housing and affordable housing along the Lawrence and El Camino corridors. This is placing a large number of low income households and troubled individuals in one area, resembling ghettos and the now-defunct San Francisco 'projects.' Why?
12. The community meetings and communications did not address most questions. In all cases, 80% of the community opposed all proposals and it's apparent that the city council is not representing its constituents. Why?
13. LifeMoves' marketing video shows a recently divorced or widowed woman who had the offer of support from her family, but she chose to 'do it on her own', which actually meant taxpayers funded her journey. Will the priority be to ask the families of the homeless to care for their troubled family members, or the taxpayers?
14. Is it your intention to go against the needs of constituents and taxpayers? Has the City evaluated the loss of revenue as a result of lower sales tax revenues? Is the assumption that many will sell their homes, allowing for the increased property tax assessments on existing homes, which may not happen if home values drop in the immediate area?
15. Do (did) any members of the council currently receive campaign funding from any of the parties, such as Sobrato, its contractors/sub contractors, or LifeMoves and its board of directors?
16. Have the Santa Clara and Sunnyvale police, public safety, and fire departments reviewed the proposal? Please provide a detailed plan of how they will ensure public safety as well as support of the new residents without negatively impacting current residents.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Birdland SE
From: Mayor and Council
To: Mayor and Council
Cc: Nadine Nader; Manuel Pineda; Andrew Crabtree; Adam Marcus; Glen Googins; Nora Pimentel; Michelle Estabillo; Marisa Welling; Stephanie Davis Subject: FW: Cost Analysis: Benton x Lawrence
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 9:49:28 AM
Attachments: image001.png
Dear Mayor and Council,
Our office received the following correspondence regarding the Public Hearing/General Business item: Consideration and Possible Actions on a Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on County-Owned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street, Including City Sponsorship and Partial Funding of Project Operations (CEQA: Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects), which we are forwarding for your review and consideration.
Please note this correspondence will form part of the public record for the April 25, 2023, Special City Council meeting.
Thank You,
Melissa Lee | Executive Assistant
Mayor & Council Offices
(408) 615-2252 | www.santaclaraca.gov
From: No Homekey in Birdland Benton <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2023 11:28 PM
Subject: Cost Analysis: Benton x Lawrence
Dear Mayor and Council Members, County Officials,
Please comment on the estimated costs for this project. Is it true that we will be spending $175,000 per household per year to house 30 families at this facility?
This is higher than the average household income in this area.
Please advise if this is typical for all Interim Housing in Santa Clara County? Thank you
Birdland SE
Cost years Annual Cost/Amortization Households Cost per Household per year Construction 34,000,000.00 27.51,236,363.64
Annual Operating4,000,000.00 14,000,000.00
5,236,363.64 30 $174,545.45
From: Mayor and Council
To: Mayor and Council
Cc: Nadine Nader; Manuel Pineda; Andrew Crabtree; Adam Marcus; Glen Googins; Nora Pimentel; Michelle Estabillo; Marisa Welling; Stephanie Davis
Subject: FW: For the City Hall April 25, 2023, Meeting Agenda. RE: Proposed Interim Housing at Benton Street and Lawrence Expressway
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 12:43:46 PM
Attachments: image001.png
Dear Mayor and Council,
Our office received the following correspondence regarding the Public Hearing/General Business item:
Consideration and Possible Actions on a Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on County-Owned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street, Including City Sponsorship and Partial Funding of Project Operations (CEQA: Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects), which we are forwarding for your review and consideration.
Please note this correspondence will form part of the public record for the April 25, 2023, Special City Council meeting.
Thank You,
Melissa Lee | Executive Assistant
Mayor & Council Offices
(408) 615-2252 | www.santaclaraca.gov
From: Benny Fong <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:44 AM
To: Clerk <[email protected]>; Mayor and Council <[email protected]> Subject: For the City Hall April 25, 2023, Meeting Agenda. RE: Proposed Interim Housing at Benton Street and Lawrence Expressway
Dear Mayor Gilmore, City Councilmembers:
We oppose the low-barrier interim housing
proposed at Benton Street & Lawrence
Expressway.
The county and LifeMoves have utterly
failed to study the project's impact on
the neighborhood, as evidenced by their
inaccurate school counts. In reality,
there are 15 schools and at least 31
daycares, serving more than 11,000
students and families within a 1.5-mile
radius of the Benton site. With Santa
Clara currently facing a police staffing
shortage, how can we possibly ensure the
safety of our community?
A homeless shelter is not a jail. Thus
the homeless are free to go in and out of
the shelter. And keep in mind these are
the "most challenging homeless". 200+
“interim homeless shelter” residents will
be out doing their “business” and
wandering around the immediate
neighborhood. With the concentration of
200 plus "most challenging homeless", many
no doubt with drug additions at this
location, drug dealers will be attracted
to come; it is well documented a
concentration of homeless people will
attract drug dealers, as in Tenderloin,
San Francisco. How many additional police
officers are assigned to this precinct,
dedicated to the “low barrier interim
homeless shelter?
We urge you to immediately vote NO on this
proposal.
Kat & Alex household
Concerned Residents of Santa Clara
From: Mayor and Council
To: Mayor and Council
Cc: Nadine Nader; Manuel Pineda; Andrew Crabtree; Adam Marcus; Glen Googins; Nora Pimentel; Michelle Estabillo; Marisa Welling; Stephanie Davis
Subject: FW: Homeless project at Benton and Lawrence
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2023 3:21:37 PM
Dear Mayor and Council,
Our office received the following correspondence regarding the Public Hearing/General Business item:
Consideration and Possible Actions on a Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on CountyOwned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street, Including City Sponsorship and Partial Funding of Project Operations (CEQA: Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects), which we are forwarding for your review and consideration.
Please note this correspondence will form part of the public record for the April 25, 2023, Special City Council meeting.
Thank You,
Melissa Lee | Executive Assistant
Mayor & Council Offices
(408) 615-2252
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Guthrie <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2023 1:11 PM
To: Mayor and Council <[email protected]> Subject: Homeless project at Benton and Lawrence
Although I live within five blocks of this development, I am in favor of seeing it completed.
While most of us enjoy our residential neighborhoods, many find that the amenities and services that a city provides can be a nuisance, especially for those living close to them. While a firehouse next door represents a net positive for the neighborhood, living next door might subject you to frequent noise. There are many examples: stadiums, freeways, schools, shopping centers. (If I had a negative, it would be the traffic generated by the Stratford School and weekend use of the play fields). Yet these 'nuisances' must be spread around the city for the benefit of all our citizens.
While I understand that Kevin may be forced to oppose this due to his constituents, I hope the rest of the council will see this project through.
Like most of California, Santa Clara has a homeless problem. Hopefully, this will help alleviate some of it.
Chris Guthrie
From: Mayor and Council
To: Mayor and Council
Cc: Nadine Nader; Manuel Pineda; Andrew Crabtree; Adam Marcus; Glen Googins; Nora Pimentel; Michelle Estabillo; Marisa Welling; Stephanie Davis
Subject: FW: LifeMoves Development
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 9:49:19 AM
Attachments: image001.png
Dear Mayor and Council,
Our office received the following correspondence regarding the Public Hearing/General Business item:
Consideration and Possible Actions on a Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on County-Owned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street, Including City Sponsorship and Partial Funding of Project Operations (CEQA: Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects), which we are forwarding for your review and consideration.
Please note this correspondence will form part of the public record for the April 25, 2023, Special City Council meeting.
Thank You,
Melissa Lee | Executive Assistant
Mayor & Council Offices
(408) 615-2252 | www.santaclaraca.gov
From: GRANT MCCAULEY <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2023 4:09 PM
To: Mayor and Council <[email protected]> Subject: LifeMoves Development
Dear Mayor and Council,
I wish I could be there in person to declare my opinion on the development of the shelter for the unhoused, proposed at the corner of Benton and Lawrence Expressway. I support this development.
I have seen and heard the ranting of some in our city that spew foul and disrespectful rants that this will downgrade our community with felons, chronic homelessness, violence and robberies. Nothing could be farther from the truth. These are the people that for some bad luck reason have found themselves in a trap of trying to live here but unfortunately do not currently have the means to get themselves out of the mire and return to a productive life.
We, as the citizens of Santa Clara, are morally obligated to give a helping hand to them and help them in their time of need. It is the morally right thing to do.
LifeMoves has proven their expertise in other local communities and are well positioned to do this for our community.
Please look into your hearts and see this as the opportunity to do the right thing for our entire city.
Support this cause!
Grant L. McCauley
Commissioner
Santa Clara Senior Advisory Commission
City of Santa Clara
408-499-4046
408-241-4847
[email protected]
www.santaclaraca.gov
From: Mayor and Council
To: Mayor and Council
Cc: Nadine Nader; Manuel Pineda; Andrew Crabtree; Adam Marcus; Glen Googins; Nora Pimentel; Michelle Estabillo; Marisa Welling; Stephanie Davis
Subject: FW: Opposing Benton Shelter
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 12:43:47 PM
Attachments: image001.png
Dear Mayor and Council,
Our office received the following correspondence regarding the Public Hearing/General Business item:
Consideration and Possible Actions on a Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on County-Owned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street, Including City Sponsorship and Partial Funding of Project Operations (CEQA: Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects), which we are forwarding for your review and consideration.
Please note this correspondence will form part of the public record for the April 25, 2023, Special City Council meeting.
Thank You,
Melissa Lee | Executive Assistant
Mayor & Council Offices
(408) 615-2252 | www.santaclaraca.gov
From: Yuanyuan Huang <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:48 AM
To: Mayor and Council <[email protected]> Subject: Opposing Benton Shelter
Hi,
My name is Yuanyuan. We are a family of 4 living in Santa Clara. We strongly oppose building a nobarrier homeless shelter at the corner lot of Benton and Lawrence expressway.
We have many neighbors providing their own reasons for opposing the no-barrier homeless shelter at the Benton lot. But below two are my main concerns.
We have been enjoying the holiday activities at that lot for many years and have had many treasured memories with our family and friends there. We would strongly prefer to keep that tradition going. It is a rare find for holiday fun in Santa Clara that the community enjoys. It's very easy to access and low cost. It greatly benefits the families that don't have the means and money to go to the other farther away and more expensive places. Cutting them off from this easily accessible holiday fun is definitely not the right thing to do as it would be very hard for our disadvantaged neighbors to find alternatives.
Another concern we have is the no-barrier nature of the shelter. The shelter is proposed to have families living in it but if there's no screening for the residents, it will have a significant negative impact on the kids of those families both mentally and physically. It's not something we want to see for those kids. From data collected from the already built shelters in other cities, we can clearly see an increased number of police calls due to medical and physical disturbance. Kids growing up in that kind of environment will have lasting mental issues.
We have many more concerns beyond the two above but given the length of the email, I'll stop here.
Thanks for your time and patience in reading the email. And we appreciate that you seriously consider our and our neighbors' concerns and stop the Benton shelter project.
Thanks and regards,
Yuanyuan
From: dale
To: Clerk
Subject: I object building a homeless facility at Benton Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 9:42:03 AM
Hi Dear Clerk,
I am Jinghu Luo, living in Santa Clara city with my family. I oppose building a homeless facility at Benton.
--
Best regards,
Jinghu Luo
From: Nanxi Li
To: Clerk
Subject: I Strongly OPPOSE Benton Shelter Proposal
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:35:57 AM
Hi,
My name is Nanxi Li, I have lived in Santa Clara for almost 3 years. I Strongly oppose building a homeless shelter at Benton.
The comparable Milpitas project provides solid evidence on crime spike. The city is seeing striking crime statistics, with total police calls increasing by 300% and total fire calls by 400% in 2022. The average police service time is close to 50 hours per month, and crimes include assault, drug-related offenses, burglary, rape, sex offender incidents, stolen vehicles. Meth was found onsite, and management is a total mess.
City should stop making excuses for those failures, but instead learn the similarities among them: It is clear that these shelters are difficult to manage, and it is challenging to remove problematic individuals from the site or the community.
Public safety data also showed LifeMoves’ MTV site experience even worse crime spike, and crime types in clued theft, death threat, rape, and more.
I don't want my community to be ruined by this horrible proposal! Nanxi Li
From: Lisa Eckstein
To: Clerk
Subject: item 23-272: in support of Lawrence/Benton interim housing Date: Saturday, April 22, 2023 7:38:06 PM
I strongly support the interim housing to be built at Lawrence and Benton. I've been a Santa Clara homeowner for over 20 years. I live near Stevens Creek Boulevard and San Tomas, a part of our city where many people live on the street. I applaud Santa Clara for addressing our local homelessness crisis by providing more safe housing and much needed resources. If you can find an additional spot for a similar housing project in my neighborhood, I'd support that as well.
I will be attending the 4/25 Public Hearing via Zoom.
Thank you,
Lisa Eckstein
From: Mathew Reed
To: Lisa Gillmor; Raj Chahal; Kathy Watanabe; Karen Hardy; Kevin Park; Sudhanshu Jain; Anthony Becker Cc: Andrew Crabtree; Adam Marcus; Consuelo Hernandez; Clerk Subject: Homekey Opportunity at Benton and Lawrence
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:41:44 AM
Attachments: image001.png
SV@Home Homekey Support Letter 4_25_2023.pdf
Mayor Gilmor, Vice-Mayor Park, and members of the City Council Re: Consideration of a proposed Homekey Interim Housing Development at Lawrence and Benton
SV@Home recommends that the City Council support the staff recommendation that Santa Clara act as a co-sponsor for the application to the State’s Project Homekey to obtain funding to develop an interim housing community at Benton and Lawrence Expressway.
As the staff memorandum outlines, Santa Clara has a clear track record of recognizing the need for interim housing as a part of a continuum of resources to respond to the needs of homeless individuals and families in the city. The recently convened Homeless Task Force has reinforced earlier city and county analysis that the lack of interim shelter resources was a critical gap in local resources. Addressing this need was a priority articulated by this Council when it directed staff to explore opportunities to leverage state Project Homekey resources in 2021, and again when you directed staff in 2022 to identify additional sites with lower costs.
This new community will give Santa Clara an opportunity to respond to real hardships experienced by so many of our neighbors. For those of us who find themselves unhoused, Interim Housing provides stability that living on the street or in your car cannot. Interim Housing provides extensive counseling and services to residents right where they are living, significantly improving opportunities to get the support they need.
This is an exceptional opportunity to leverage State, County and the Sobrato Organization’s commitment of resources in a way that is responsive to local priorities making local investment more impactful. We acknowledge the work that City staff have done to clarify and minimize the long term financial obligations to the city, which posed a significant barrier to council support of earlier potential Homekey sites.
We appreciate that this has been a very challenging discussion for the Santa Clara community. We also appreciate the responsiveness of the County and LifeMoves to many of the concerns that have been raised. The proposed project is less tall, less dense, and has fewer units than originally proposed. It will serve families with children in multi-bedroom suites, as requested. It will provide significantly more parking spaces than similar communities throughout the county. It will allow local Santa Clara and Sunnyvale residents to be prioritized for residence in the new community. Each of these are major changes made in direct response to public feedback and show a real commitment to being a good neighbor to the community.
The crisis of individuals and families living unhoused in our communities calls for local action and accountability. Santa Clara has long recognized this need. We urge you to support this opportunity to take action.
Sincerely,
Regina Celestin Williams
Executive Director
Mathew Reed
Director of Policy
669-254-1009
350 W. Julian Street, Building 5, San José, CA 95110
www.svathome.org • [email protected]
TRANSMITTED VIA EMAIL
April 25, 2023
Santa Clara City Council
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, California
Mayor Gilmor, Vice-Mayor Park, and members of the City Council Re: Consideration of a proposed Homekey Interim Housing Development at Lawrence and Benton
SV@Home recommends that the City Council support the staff recommendation that Santa Clara act as a co-sponsor for the application to the State’s Project Homekey to obtain funding to develop an interim housing community at Benton and Lawrence Expressway.
As the staff memorandum outlines, Santa Clara has a clear track record of recognizing the need for interim housing as a part of a continuum of resources to respond to the needs of homeless individuals and families in the city. The recently convened Homeless Task Force has reinforced earlier city and county analysis that the lack of interim shelter resources was a critical gap in local resources. Addressing this need was a priority articulated by this Council when it directed staff to explore opportunities to leverage state Project Homekey resources in 2021, and again when you directed staff in 2022 to identify additional sites with lower costs.
This new community will give Santa Clara an opportunity to respond to real hardships experienced by so many of our neighbors. For those of us who find themselves unhoused, Interim Housing provides stability that living on the street or in your car cannot. Interim Housing provides extensive counseling and services to residents right where they are living, significantly improving opportunities to get the support they need.
This is an exceptional opportunity to leverage State, County and the Sobrato Organization’s commitment of resources in a way that is responsive to local priorities making local investment more impactful. We acknowledge the work that City staff have done to clarify and minimize the long term financial obligations to the city, which posed a significant barrier to council support of earlier potential Homekey sites.
We appreciate that this has been a very challenging discussion for the Santa Clara community. We also appreciate the responsiveness of the County and LifeMoves to many of the concerns that have been raised. The proposed project is less tall, less dense, and has fewer units than originally proposed. It will serve families with children in multi-bedroom suites, as requested. It will provide significantly more parking spaces than similar communities throughout the county. It will allow local Santa Clara and Sunnyvale residents to be prioritized for residence in the new community. Each of these are major changes made in direct response to public feedback and show a real commitment to being a good neighbor to the community.
Board of Directors
Kevin Zwick, Chair
United Way Bay Area
Shiloh Ballard, Vice Chair
Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition
Candice Gonzalez, Secretary
Sand Hill Property Company
Andrea Osgood, Treasurer
Eden Housing
Bob Brownstein
Working Partnerships USA
Amie Fishman
Non-Profit Housing
Association of Northern CA
Aubrey Merriman
LifeMoves
Randy Tsuda
Alta Housing
Nevada Merriman
MidPen
Steven Yang
Northern CA LIIF
Javier Gonzalez
Google
Poncho Guevara
Sacred Heart Community
Service
Jennifer Loving
Destination: Home
Chris Neale
The Core Companies
Staff
Regina Celestin Williams
Executive Director
April 25, 2023
Re: Project Homekey Benton and Lawrence
350 W. Julian Street, Building 5, San José, CA 95110
408.780.8411 • www.svathome.org • [email protected] The crisis of individuals and families living unhoused in our communities calls for local action and accountability. Santa Clara has long recognized this need. We urge you to support this opportunity to take action.
Sincerely,
Regina Celestin Williams
Executive Director
From: Maria Salvatore
To: Clerk
Subject: Meeting ID: 997-0675-9306 - Oposed
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 12:30:49 AM
I am strongly opposed to the interim housing project in the corner of Benton and Lawrence due to low barrier entry with no background check for criminal or substance abuse. This site is in a well established family residential area and close to schools and walked by neighbors..
Although homelessness and poverty are not in themselves criminal, many homeless experience mental illness and drug problems which could adversely affect the community.
This is a risk I don't want you to take on my behalf.
Respectfully,
Maria
34 years community resident
From: Jun L
To: Clerk
Subject: no homeless facility @ benton and lawrence
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:36:11 AM
Hi, There,
I’m living in Santa Clara with my family for about 15 years, now we are strongly oppose building a homeless facility at Benton & Lawrence area. Look at the San Francisco City today, we don’t want to be that! Please listen to santa clara residences’ voice, we all wish to live in a safe neighborhood.
Thank you,
Jun & Mu & lots of people living in Briarwood Dr.
Sent from my iPhone
From: Charlie Zhang
To: Clerk
Subject: No homeless shelter on benton
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:00:59 AM
Hi, I am Qiaolin Zhang, living in santa clara with my family. I strongly oppose building a homeless shelter on Benton & Lawrence.
Thanks,
Qiaolin
From: HUI ZHUO
To: Clerk
Subject: No to Homekey Project on Benton!
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:45:51 AM
Hello,
My name is Hui Zhuo, a resident of Santa Clara 95051 with my family. Our Kids are also enrolled in school adjacent to the proposed Homekey project on Benton. I strongly oppose building a homeless shelter on Benton!!!
Regards,
Hui Zhuo
From: Zhihao Ji
To: Clerk
Subject: Oppose Benton Shelter Project
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:33:52 AM
Dear City Council Members,
Thank you for scheduling all four community meetings, and really appreciate that you can hear from us patiently. But after four community meetings, I still strongly oppose this project, and hope you can really re-consider this project for nearby residents and neighborhood.
1. I cannot trust that Lifemoves can operate this site properly. According to the community meeting, there will be only 2-3 staff that work for this site, but there will be 120 tenants in the site. This I believe will definitely expose a lot of potential issues.
2. In the newest proposal, the city will have to contribute $3.5 million in 7 years, and there's still a $5.5 million gap. If we consider the inflation, I believe this will put a severe financial burden on the city.
3. I talked to some tenants in Lifemoves MTV site, they all have been living there for more than 6 months, while the interim shelter is designed for providing housing for 90 days. So I'm not sure whether LifeMoves can really help homeless people to get to the next step. And in the newest proposal, they have changed the stay time to 3-12 months, which is much longer than previous interim housing guidelines.
4. I'm not sure whether you have been to LifeMoves MTV, the leghorn street around the shelter is a very shity area. I don't want Benton Street to be like that.
We want to help homeless people, but we also hope we can work on a win-win project instead of sacrificing local residents.
Thank you!
Best,
Zhihao
From: Sean Liu
To: Clerk
Subject: Oppose Benton shelter
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2023 10:32:24 AM
Hello,
My name is Sheng Liu, a parent and resident in the neighborhood close to Benton & Lawrence intersection. I want to express my great concern and opposition about the Benton project. This low barrier homeless housing initiative for male singles is a potential safety risk to our children, and it is unacceptable that it would allow criminals, drug addicts, and sex offenders to stay. This was confirmed in all three community hearings that have been held so far. We need to ensure the safety of our children and prevent our community from becoming a magnet for crime.
Sheng
--
Sheng Liu
PhD
Senior research scientist
KLA TENCOR
From: He Bu
To: Clerk
Subject: Oppose building a homeless facility at Benton
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2023 8:33:00 AM
Hi, I am He Bu, living in Santa Clara with my family. I oppose building a homeless facility at Benton
Thanks,
He
From: xue yang
To: Clerk
Subject: Oppose interim housing at Lawrence and Benton
Date: Saturday, April 22, 2023 10:59:48 PM
Dear Council Members,
Please vote NO to the interim housing at Lawrence and Benton proposal.
I'm a Santa Clara city resident and a mother of two kids. We are so sad to see this proposal take our kids most favorite Halloween place away. Our whole family opposes this proposal because of tons of reasons.
Lifemoves supervised similar shelter projects in nearby cities,but their records are poor. Client stories and county data show LifeMoves Mountain View is falling short of its promises. The program director and staff mishandle conflicts and despite harassment reports. Besides, the construction cost estimate of LifeMoves Palo Alto shelter was doubled within a year.
We cannot believe any promises LifeMoves made, and if Santa Clara city fully relying on LifeMoves will put our community in danger and waste our tax money. The interim shelter project needs competition to avoid corruption and be transparent to city residents.
This lot is our kids most favorite Halloween place, turning it into a shelter is such a big disappointment to them! This lot is one of the last community event places in Santa Clara.
Please don't take it away from our kids!
We have collected over 5000 wet signatures, please stay with our Santa Clara residents and vote NO! Please make Santa Clara city better, not worse! Thank you!
From: Eva S
To: Clerk
Subject: Oppose to Benton Shelter
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:31:40 AM
Hi,
My name is Eva and I live in Santa Clara City, I oppose building a homeless shelter at Benton.
Please consider the opinions from people who live here.
Thanks,
Eva
From: Sandy Jiao
To: Clerk
Subject: Oppose to the proposed Benton-Lawrance temporary housing project Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:52:30 AM
Hi,
My name is Yang Jiao and I live at Benton St with my wife now.
I'm writing to strongly oppose building this temporary housing project at Benton and here are my reasons:
1. Density: LifeMoves proposes to house 30 modules with possibly 90 or more rooms in prefabricated modules on a 1 acre lot, which raises concerns about the environmental impact and safety of housing so many people on such a small site.
2. Intersection: The Benton location is located at a busy intersection where thousands of vehicles pass through each day. The increased foot traffic from LifeMoves Benton residents, including people with serious physical or mental illnesses and criminal records, children and pregnant women, poses a significant danger to pedestrians.
3. Parking: with only 56 parkings, 30% or more will be reserved for staff. It will surely cause parking overflow issues, as already evidenced by LifeMoves’ Mountain View site.
4. Bioretention Compliance: The project does not appear to have a plan and budget for compliance with required stormwater treatment measures, and the cost and maintenance of such measures can be expensive, which will likely increase the budget requirements for the City to maintain.
5. Crime increase: The comparable Milpitas project provides solid evidence on crime spike. The city is seeing striking crime statistics, with total police calls increasing by 300% and total fire calls by 400% in 2022. The average police service time is close to 50 hours per month, and crimes include assault, drug-related offenses, burglary, rape, sex offender incidents, stolen vehicles. Meth was found onsite, and management is a total mess.
City should stop making excuses for those failures, but instead learn the similarities among them: It is clear that these shelters are difficult to manage, and it is challenging to remove problematic individuals from the site or the community.
Please review those concerns and I'm counting on the city council to make the right decision based on the neighbor feedback for this project.
Thanks,
Yang
From: Yuanyuan Huang
To: Clerk
Subject: Opposing Benton homeless shelter
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:46:14 AM
Hi,
My name is Louisa. We are a family of 4 living in Santa Clara. We strongly oppose building a no-barrier homeless shelter at the corner lot of Benton and Lawrence expressway.
We have many neighbors providing their own reasons for opposing the no-barrier homeless shelter at the Benton lot. But below two are my main concerns.
We have been enjoying the holiday activities at that lot for many years and have had many treasured memories with our family and friends there. We would strongly prefer to keep that tradition going. It is a rare find for holiday fun in Santa Clara that the community enjoys. It's very easy to access and low cost. It greatly benefits the families that don't have the means and money to go to the other farther away and more expensive places. Cutting them off from this easily accessible holiday fun is definitely not the right thing to do as it would be very hard for our disadvantaged neighbors to find alternatives.
Another concern we have is the no-barrier nature of the shelter. The shelter is proposed to have families living in it but if there's no screening for the residents, it will have a significant negative impact on the kids of those families both mentally and physically. It's not something we want to see for those kids. From data collected from the already built shelters in other cities, we can clearly see an increased number of police calls due to medical and physical disturbance. Kids growing up in that kind of environment will have lasting mental issues.
We have many more concerns beyond the two above but given the length of the email, I'll stop here. Thanks for your time and patience in reading the email. And we appreciate that you seriously consider our and our neighbors' concerns and stop the Benton shelter project.
Thanks and regards,
Yuanyuan
From: Yanbin Chen
To: Clerk
Subject: Opposing Benton Project
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 10:57:30 AM
Dear Council Members,
My name is Yanbin Chen and I am a resident of Santa Clara. I am writing to express my strong opposition to the Benton proposal for a low barrier homeless shelter.
As a member of this community, I am deeply concerned about the location of this shelter. Every year, especially in the fall, the pumpkin patch at Benton Street is a must go for my family. We have created many wonderful memories celebrating festivals there. I am disappointed that the proposal has chosen this location for a shelter, as it is an important gathering place for community events.
Moreover, I am worried about the potential impact of a low-barrier shelter on our community. I fear that it will lead to an increase in crime and drug use. Additionally, I am concerned about the impact that the shelter could have on our schools and property values.
Furthermore, the proposed shelter is next to Lawrence Expressway, which is a very busy road from day to night. In addition to noise, I am concerned about the potential safety risks that the busy traffic could pose to the homeless people, especially those with mental health and drug use issues.
Therefore, I urge you to vote NO on the Benton proposal for a low-barrier homeless shelter. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely, Yanbin Chen
From: Jie Han
To: Clerk
Subject: Please STOP the Lawrence & Benton HomeKey project Date: Sunday, April 23, 2023 11:45:15 AM
Hello!
My name is Jie Han, a resident of Santa Clara City and a mother.
I strongly oppose building the low-barrier container-style homeless shelter at Lawrence & Benton. There are more than 20 schools and daycares nearby, many of them are within walking distance. Our kids go across the road every day. They play in the nearby playground and grassland often. Given that shelter is intended to be low-barrier, without screening, and expect many occupants to have crime records and mental issues, it doesn't look like a good idea to have such a shelter so close to our kids to me.
Not to mention there is already another shelter, Bella Vista, under construction 0.5 miles away from the proposed site. We don't know yet how that shelter would change the dynamics of the neighborhood, nor do we know if that shelter will run as expected. In fact, given the results of the shelters built in other cities, it's far from optimistic.
Apart from the concerns of impact to local residents, I'm also uncomfortable about the proposed plan of the shelter construction itself. It will be a stretch to host that many people with such a small staff/residents ratio as proposed in a tiny area, especially that people coming there could have drug and mental issues. Will they get what they need to recover from the hardship? Or it'll just be yet another build-and-forget project that people don't bother to take a look at after spending the time and money? To reiterate, the Benton shelter project is irresponsible to both nearby residents, our kids and people they're trying to help. Please DO NOT build it!! Best,
Jie Han
From: Mayor and Council
To: Darshana
Cc: Clerk
Subject: RE: City covenants on homeowners and new shelter at Benton & Lawrence Date: Monday, April 24, 2023 11:48:37 AM
Attachments: image001.png
Hello,
Our office confirms receipt of your email regarding the Public Hearing/General Business item:
Consideration and Possible Actions on a Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on County-Owned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street, Including City Sponsorship and Partial Funding of Project Operations (CEQA: Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects), which has been forwarded to the full City Council for their review.
Please note this correspondence will form part of the public record for the April 25, 2023, Special City Council meeting.
Thank You,
Melissa Lee | Executive Assistant
Mayor & Council Offices
(408) 615-2252 | www.santaclaraca.gov
From: Darshana <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2023 10:36 AM
To: Mayor and Council <[email protected]>; Kathy Watanabe <[email protected]>; Raj Chahal <[email protected]>; Karen Hardy <[email protected]>; Kevin Park <[email protected]>; Sudhanshu Jain <[email protected]>; Anthony Becker <[email protected]> Subject: City covenants on homeowners and new shelter at Benton & Lawrence Hello Ms. Mayor and respected council members
Subject: Release homeowners from city covenants if new shelter at Benton & Lawrence is approved Please spend two minutes of your time to read this email in brief as I am bringing very unique situation to your attention.
We all know about new shelter proposal at our pumpkin patch and Christmas tree location and we are frightened.
What is more frightening for very small portion of families, including mine, is that they feel stuck in this situation -10-12 years back many families, who were first time home buyers and chose make Santa Clara city their home, received small amount of down payment assistance or 2nd loan. Issue is even after money received as part of assistance are re-payed, city has covenant restriction on renting as well as selling our homes. We have faithfully lived more than 10 years.
Now we all know very well that such programs like shelters are not risk free and we have data from many such facilities showing that.
If we want to rent out our homes and rent somewhere else, far away from this location, we are not free to do so.
If City council on April 25th approves this project, can city council also pass a resolution to release any existing city covenants on homes at least within 1 mile radius of this facility. That will be a great relief that we will at least feel bit more safer by moving away Thanking in anticipation. I hope you will make best decision for Santa Clara city and it’s long time residents.
Regards,
Darshana
From: Mayor and Council
To: No Homekey in Birdland Benton
Cc: Clerk
Subject: RE: "Vacant Land"
Date: Monday, April 24, 2023 11:49:06 AM
Attachments: image001.png
Hello,
Our office confirms receipt of your email regarding the Public Hearing/General Business item:
Consideration and Possible Actions on a Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on County-Owned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street, Including City Sponsorship and Partial Funding of Project Operations (CEQA: Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects), which has been forwarded to the full City Council for their review.
Please note this correspondence will form part of the public record for the April 25, 2023, Special City Council meeting.
Thank You,
Melissa Lee | Executive Assistant
Mayor & Council Offices
(408) 615-2252 | www.santaclaraca.gov
From: No Homekey in Birdland Benton <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2023 5:57 PM
Subject: 'Vacant Land'
"The proposed site is vacant land located at the intersection of Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street near the Santa/Clara Sunnyvale border."
It appears the county sat on this land for decades, perhaps waiting for certain developers (and the right opportunity to attract federal and state funds) rather than making it available for housing tech workers, public employees, and Kaiser health/service workers who sit in traffic for 4 hours a day. (Another batch of workers just lost their jobs at Bed Bath and Beyond.
Again, please explain what jobs you anticipate the homeless people will find nearby?) Or a county parkland for local residents like the many county parks in other cities. I don't see any in Santa Clara...
A few examples:
Almaden Quicksilver County ParkSan JoseAlviso Marina County ParkSan JoseAnderson Lake County ParkMorgan HillCalero County ParkSan JoseChesbro Reservoir County ParkMorgan HillChitactac- Adams Heritage County ParkGilroyCoyote Creek ParkwaySan JoseCoyote Lake Harvey Bear Ranch County ParkGilroyEd R. Levin County ParkMilpitasField Sports ParkSan JoseHellyer County ParkSan JoseJoseph D. Grant County ParkSan JoseLexington Reservoir County ParkLos GatosLos Gatos Creek County ParkCampbellMartial Cottle ParkSan JoseMetcalf Motorcycle County ParkSan JoseMt.
Madonna County ParkWatsonvillePenitencia CreekSan JoseRancho San Antonio County ParkCupertinoSanborn County ParkSaratogaSanta Teresa County ParkSan JoseStevens Creek County ParkCupertinoSunnyvale Baylands ParkSunnyvaleUpper Stevens Creek County ParkPalo AltoUvas Canyon County ParkMorgan HillUvas Reservoir County ParkMorgan HillVasona Lake County ParkLos GatosVilla MontalvoSaratoga
From: Nora Pimentel
To: Nora Pimentel
Cc: Michelle Estabillo
Subject: FW: SafeSCC response to proposal April 25
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 10:19:34 AM
Attachments: Community Comments to City Proposal-final.pdf image001.png
Good morning Mayor and Councilmembers
Please see the attached community comments received this morning, the speaker will make reference to this attachment. This will form part of the public record of this evenings meeting.
Thank you
Nora Pimentel, MMC|Assistant City Clerk | City Clerk's Office City of Santa Clara, California
1500 Warburton Ave. | Santa Clara, CA 95050
(O) 1.408.615.2222 | (F) 1.408.241.6771
[email protected] | www.santaclaraca.gov
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Le H. <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 9:55 AM
Subject: SafeSCC response to proposal April 25
To: Nora Pimentel <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>
Hi, Nora,
Attached please find the slides that we are going to present in today's council meeting on behalf of SafeSCC.
Appreciate if you could incorporate this into the agenda.
Thanks,
Zhihao and Le
Community Comments to
City Proposal on the Benton Project
SafeSCC
04/25/2023
Vast majority of the residents oppose the project.
SafeSCC strongly urge the City Council vote NO.
2 This is an extremely short notice to the community
City proposal:
● Was released to the public on Friday 04/21/2023 at 5 PM! Community comments:
● This is a new proposal which is totally different from the proposals the community has been engaged with.
● Community needs more time to read and think about it. ● Sufficient time should also be given to the city council before they can vote on it.
3 Site design and operation details are missing
City proposal:
● Details are not included
Community comments:
● Site internal and external design details are missing ○ E.g. size of each room, arrangement of buildings, site plans, fence, etc ● Operation details are missing
○ Program guidelines are vague and lacking details
● No mention of how LifeMoves’ operation will be supervised ○ What if LifeMoves failed to accomplish their commitment like that in Mountain View? 4 The “Low Barrier” nature remains unchanged
City proposal:
● Page 5: “Housing First principles and a low barrier placement process limit what screening criteria can be applied.”
Community comments:
● No matter if it’s families with children or singles, 30 units or 100 units, if the low barrier nature doesn’t change, meaning no/little background check will be done, the site remains a serious safety risk to the neighborhood as well as the tenants of the shelter.
● This is a major concern from the community.
5 Site selection neglects neighborhood safety
City proposal:
● Page 7: “the Homekey program is highly competitive and points are awarded to projects that are in proximity to essential services such as grocery stories, health facilities, libraries, pharmacies, and public parks.” Community comments:
● The site is selected because of how the Homekey points are awarded. ● Neighborhood safety is completely ignored in site selection. ● San Jose Branham just started construction last week. No data is available yet and can’t used to justify Benton site selection.
6 Program rules don’t consider community safety
City proposal
● Page 9: “Community Guidelines: specific rules around warnings, grounds for program termination, and grounds for immediate discharge including drugs or alcohol on premises, weapons, physical assault or threats of violence, sexual harassment, illegal activities, destruction, vandalism, or theft.” Community comments:
● The guidelines are for the Benton site. There is no guarantee that such behaviors will NOT occur in the neighborhood. How can the city prevent crime from happening outside the site?
● If tenants are evicted due to violation of the guidelines, they may stay in the neighborhood and become safety threat to the community. 7 Tenant placement is questionable
City proposal:
● Page 8: “to place these families with children (999 Hamlin Court, Sunnyvale) at the Benton/Lawrence site and set aside space at 999 Hamlin Court for singles and couples from Santa Clara”
● Page 9: “If at some point there were no unhoused households with children to place, the building would place single clients in dorm style “flex” units.” Community comments:
● This demonstrates rules for tenant placement can be easily changed during operation.
● The site even though proposed as family only can place single clients in the future.
8 Interim Housing is not effective
City proposal:
● Page 5: “63% of people served by interim housing programs found permanent housing”
https://www.almanacnews.com/news/2023/03/30/lifemoves-mountain -view-promises-to-help-homeless-clients-find-stable-housing-in-three -months-the-vast-majority-dont
Community comments:
For the eight programs in Santa Clara County,
● an average of 44% of people found permanent
housing,
For LifeMoves Mountain View:
● only 26% people at LifeMoves Mountain View
found permanent housing
● Many didn’t receive any supportive service and
chose to go back to streets 9
Unit cost is TOO HIGH
City proposal:
● Pages 10: $34 Millions to construct 30
family units.
Community comments:
● More than $1 million per family unit without land.
● For LifeMoves Mountain View site, it’s < $95k/door with land. ● Please breakdown cost estimate to justify.
● What if Palo Alto case happens again here?
10 Financial gap is unresolved
City proposal:
● Pages 10 and 11: $5.5M Operating
Gap for the first 7 years.
Community comments:
● If LifeMoves doesn’t fill the gap, city will face $9M operation cost in 7 years. ● Homekey requires operation duration for 30 years.
● How is the project going to be operated after year 7? If operation remains the same, there is a significant operating gap for the next 23 years: $4M-$5M/year. ● All these fundings assumed best scenario. Who will fill the gap if best scenario didn’t happen? 11
Benton site is similar to White Oak Lane (rejected)
City proposal:
● Page 2: “City Council members expressed concern about the financing gap for the White Oak Lane project which could end up needing a City contribution of approximately $14MM over seven years. Councilmembers were also concerned with the shape and orientation of the site in relation to the nearby expressway, and the location which directly faces residential uses on White Oak Lane and Poinciana Drive.”
Community comments:
● City council rejected White Oak Lane in 2021
● If White Oak Lane shouldn’t pass, why should Benton?
12 Report is full of false and misleading information
● Page 2: City of Mountain View attributes its 43% decline from 2019 to 2022 to a variety of City investments into homelessness services including the LifeMoves interim housing site.-> True reason is MTV started to ban RV parking on streets from 2019 and fully forbidden in 2022.
● Page 8:The County evaluated sites based on several factors, including lot size, accessibility for construction equipment, proximity to transit, and access to utilities, medical services, and grocery stores. -> The site is not close to these facilities.
● Page 6: The proposed site is vacant land located at the intersection of Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street near the Santa/Clara Sunnyvale border -> Not vacant, more than 3000 families visited each year for holiday celebrations and used as church parking every weekend
● Page 6: In addition, a project that receives funding under Project Homekey is exempted from local land use authority as well as CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) environmental review. -> Could not be exempted ● 30 units -> 30 modules, 90 families at most, could stay more than 120 ● Program participants typically stay in interim housing for three to twelve months depending on their needs while they stabilize their lives and look for permanent housing. -> Could potentially stay longer. ● Page 9: “The City’s Police Department has confirmed there is not a shortage of uniformed police officers and that the Police Department will be ready to respond if there is an increase in calls for service.”-> PD is understaffed 13 Conclusion
The proposal is rushed, flawed and poses safety and financial risks:
● Short notice to the public
● Ignorance of community concerns
● False and misleading statements
● Missing design and operation details
● Financial risks
SafeSCC strongly urge the City Council to vote NO.
14 From: Mayor and Council
To: Mayor and Council
Cc: Nadine Nader; Manuel Pineda; Andrew Crabtree; Adam Marcus; Glen Googins; Nora Pimentel; Michelle Estabillo; Marisa Welling; Stephanie Davis
Subject: FW: Materials for City Council Meeting April 25 Date: Sunday, April 23, 2023 3:22:59 PM
Attachments: Navigation Centers.pdf
Homelessness in California_ Causes and ...pdf
Bay Area Homelessness, New Urgency.pdf
The Price of Ending Homelessness in California_ $8 Billion a Year - Bloomberg.pdf Tips and advice for talking to your kid...omelessness _ Housing _ sfexaminer.pdf SCC PIT.pdf
Addressing Racial Disparities - Destination_ Home.pdf
image003.png
Dear Mayor and Council,
Our office received the following correspondence regarding the Public Hearing/General Business item:
Consideration and Possible Actions on a Proposed 30-Unit Homekey Interim Housing Development on County-Owned Land Located at Lawrence Expressway and Benton Street, Including City Sponsorship and Partial Funding of Project Operations (CEQA: Statutory Exemption under Government Code Section 65913.4, SB 35 Affordable Housing Projects), which we are forwarding for your review and consideration.
Please note this correspondence will form part of the public record for the April 25, 2023, Special City Council meeting.
Thank You,
Melissa Lee | Executive Assistant
Mayor & Council Offices
(408) 615-2252 | www.santaclaraca.gov
From: Santa Clara Housing Advocates <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2023 1:21 PM
To: Clerk <[email protected]>; Mayor and Council <[email protected]> Subject: Materials for City Council Meeting April 25
Hi,
Attached are materials that we would like to be delivered to City Council PRIOR to the meeting on April 25, if possible.
Thank you,
Elysa Gurman
Santa Clara Housing Advocates
869 Bing Dr
!
"
#
$%&'
(
&) !&
'
#(
#
*&
+#&
' '
, %&#$
(-
$ .
&
*%%
# ) -
!
/01023045678 9:0;<4506=7>?3@0>74:03A2<41<@<= B7@CD3:EFG77@7>HIJ@0FH7@0F= KC;3:F<CH7@0F=K:3@=505 /3=LMNO P
&
#'
'
&%&#
(
%#
!#&$
(%#
(
&. '&
&
Q
.$&
*'
.
(R". 'R
. 'ST
) #
(U&. (
#
&& V #W . XP
%&% # "$
%&# &.(.( ..$
(
'
# # Y # $
(
#
Z& #
(R". 'R
. ' !# XP
[!$
&
'
'.
&#
. .
(
&
#S&
&#
' &# .
# "
Q
.$&
*'
.
(R". 'R
. 'S"
T
) #
(U&. (
#
&
#"&
#&!
'X
! "
# """ $%
& '()*+(,*-./0.,012(.3/1*4055555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555556
7.(892*2:;0,<-3-8-+9=>?(4*.*.+/1*40@0)082A2*.+BCDEE(,(555555555555555555555555555555555555555F
7.(892*2:G02H8,2='-@*.I>2,(J8*2<03K0,L00.'()*+(,*-./0.,012(.3/1*40555555555555555555M
7.(892*2N;0,<-3-8-+9=O.,01)*0L*.+PBH1)09*.+/-44H.*,9;04J0125555555555555555555555555:Q
7.(892*2NG02H8,2='0*+<J-12K08*0)0/1*40G04(*.03A.R<(.+03555555555555555555555555555555555555:Q /-.R8H2*-.='()*+(,*-./0.,012S()0'->TT0R,-.'0*+<J-1<--3/1*40555555555555555555555555555:: '()*+(,*-./0.,012(.3U*2*J80S-408022.0225555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555:: ;0,<-3-8-+9=O.,01)*0L*.+(.3BH1)09*.+/-44H.*,9;04J012555555555555555555555555555555555555555:N G02H8,2='0*+<J-12K08*0)0U*2*J80S-408022.022<(2E0R10(2035555555555555555555555555555555555555555:N @*4*,(,*-.2=B(4V80;(9'-,G0V1020.,,<0>.,*10/-44H.*,9555555555555555555555555555555555555555555:W /-.R8H2*-.='()*+(,*-./0.,012@*I089E0R10(20U*2*J80S-408022.0225555555555555555555555555555555:X '()*+(,*-./0.,012(.3D1-V01,9U(8H0255555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555 ;0,<-3-8-+9=A2*.+Y*88-LS-40U(8H0E(,(,->?(4*.0D1-V01,9U(8H025555555555555555555555555:X G02H8,2='()*+(,*-./0.,012E-'-,7TT0R,'0*+<J-1<--3D1-V01,9U(8H02555555555555555555555555:Z @*4*,(,*-.2='0*+<J-1<--3K-H.3(1*02E-'-,788-LT-1BV0R*T*R*,955555555555555555555555555555555555:[ /-.R8H2*-.='()*+(,*-./0.,012E-'-,7VV0(1,-G03HR0D1-V01,9U(8H02555555555555 \,<01D-,0.,*(8O4V(R,2(.3710(2-TO.,0102,5555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555:6 '()*+(,*-./0.,012(10A.8*I089,-7TT0R,KH2*.02202555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555 (,*-./0.,012;(97TT0R,'0*+<J-1<--3/80(.8*.02255555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555:6 '0*+<J-12]-H83@*I0;-10/-44H.*,9>.+(+040.,555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555:F
^_
!"# $%& '(%"# ') *$% +,$%-!.-' !. !% "
/,'- .. ') 0/$%&!%1 !". % "2',3 ') %$4!1$"!'% - %" ,.5 $% (/&$" & 4 ,.!'% ') $ ",$&!"!'%$6 '7 6 .. .
6" ,8 9'2 4 ,5 /6$%. "' '/ % % 2 - %" ,. $, .'7 "!7 . 7 " 2!" '//'.!"!'% ),'7 / '/6 2
' 6!4 ', 2',3 % $,:#8 *(-
'//'.!"!'%
$. :6'-3 & /6$%. "' '/ % .!7!6$, .!" . !% *$% +,$%-!.-' $%& !7/ & . ;<= >?;@AB CD?E?;@ ;F GHFI?J= <FK=E=BB . ,4!- .8 L '/6 '//'. & "' %$4!1$"!'% - %" ,. $%& . 6" ,. 0/, .. & -'%- ,% "
$" "
# 7!1
"
$4 $ % 1$"!4 !7/$-" '% "
.(,,'(%&!%1 % !1
:',
''&5 .(-
$. :# !%-, $.!%1 -,!7 5 !%-, $.!%1 4!.!:6
'7 6 ..% ..5 ', & -, $.!%1 /,'/ ,"# 4$6( .8
!. , /'," 0$7!% . 2
"
, "
. !7/$-". '--(, !% /,$-"!- 8
MM
N% $%$6#.!. ') *$% +,$%-!.-' L'6!- O /$,"7 %" &$"$ !%&!-$" & " $" %$4!1$"!'% - %" ,.
$4 %' )) -" '% % !1
:',
''& -,!7 8
!. $%$6#.!. , 4 $6 & "
$" "
%(7: , ') -,!7 . '--(,,!%1 % $, %$4!1$"!'% - %" ,. 2$. $//,'0!7$" 6# P($6 "' " %(7: , ') -,!7 . '--(,,!%1 $" .!7!6$, 6'-$"!'%. 2!"
'(" - %" ,.8
N .(,4 # ') / '/6 6!4!%1 $%& 2',3!%1 % $, %$4!1$"!'% - %" ,. $6.' !%&!-$" & " $" %$4!1$"!'% - %" , /, . %- !. (%, 6$" & "' % !1
:',
''& -,!7 8 Q4 ,
$6) ') .(,4 # & -'77(%!"# 7 7: ,. : 6! 4 & "
$" % !1
:',
''& -,!7 6 4 6.
$& ."$# & "
.$7 .!%- $ %$4!1$"!'% - %" , '/ % & % $,:#5 $%& ) 6" R(." $. .$) !% " $, $ $. "
#
$& /, 4!'(.6#8
ST
U
V
N:'("
$6) ') .(,4 # & -'77(%!"# 7 7: ,. ) 6" "
$" 4!.!:6
'7 6 ..% .. & -, $. & $)" , $ %$4!1$"!'% - %" , '/ % & !% " !, % !1
:',
''&.8 N P($," , : 6! 4 & "
$" "
$7'(%" ') 4!.!:6
'7 6 ..% ..
$& ."$# & "
.$7 5 $%& $ P($," , : 6! 4 & !"
$& !%-, $. &8 9'2 4 ,5 , .(6". 4$,! & :# 6'-$"!'%8 W !1 :',. ') "
XYZ[ \!..!'% %$4!1$"!'% - %" , 2 , 7', 6!3 6# "' ."$" " $" "
, 2$. $% !%-, $. !% 4!.!:6
'7 6 ..% .. "
$% / '/6 % $, '"
, .!" .8
MM ]
V
L,'/ ,"# 4$6( . 2 , ,!.!%1 !% $66 % !1
:',
''&.5 , 1$,&6 .. ') %$4!1$"!'% - %" , /, . %- 8
\!..!'% .$2 $% ./ -!$66# 6$,1 !%-, $. !% /,'/ ,"# 4$6( .5 & ./!" : !%1 " '%6# % !1
:',
''&
'."!%1 7(6"!/6 %$4!1$"!'% - %" ,.8 W !1
:',. 6!4!%1 2!"
!% '% :6'-3 ') "
%$4!1$"!'% - %" ,. &!& %'" : 6! 4 "
$" "
- %" ,.
$& $%# )) -" '% "
4$6( ') "
!, /,'/ ,"#8
! "#$#
%
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
Q
R
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
>5, ?)5,'+2'( E<D: Z(+,. +, F+10 [(108022 \(3,. 5,* >3)=09@ ]0.)+0=0* C)(1 /..6^__/2/@2C-(=@()-_)0205)'/U)06().2_25,UC)5,'+2'(U/(108022U6(+,.U+,U.+10U'(3,.U)06().2_ E >5, ?)5,'+2'( E<D: [(108022 `,+a30 b(3./ \(3,. 5,* >3)=09@ ]0.)+0=0* C)(1 /..6^__/2/@2C-(=@()-_H6U'(,.0,._368(5*2_E<D:_<X_E<D:Ub(3./UZcFU?+,58U]06().UX@ED@D:@6*C B Z0)260'.+=02 C)(1 ./0 W5=+-5.+(, \0,.0)^ ]06(). dD@ >5, ?)5,'+2'( SCC+'0 (C ./0 \(,.)(880)@ ]0.)+0=0* C)(1 /..6^__/2/@2C-(=@()-_)0205)'/U)06().2_ A W5=+-5.+(, \0,.0) e5.5 C)(1 ./0 >5, ?)5,'+2'( e065).10,. (C [(108022,022 5,* >366().+=0 [(32+,-@ ]0.)+0=0* E<Df4 g59 B@ \0,.)58 h5.0)C)(,. W5=+-5.+(, \0,.0)
!
"
#
$%
%%
%
$&
"
#
%
'%
''%
()*+,-./010,,,023(40,,*,)0/56-(4-
#
78
%'
%%
'
9-0:;3(<;)(.:40:)02,+2.10(:)-(,,*,)0/(,).=2.3(>0;=1;40
$
%%
?
'
@ABCDEFGHIJK@ILBCIMBFJNAJMAGH @ABCDEFGDFFKOPPFHBMBFJQRPAKAHSFRATAHHUAGLBVAH W %
)-04()*+,
'
X
'
'
%%
%
%
$&$
Y
'% "
''
'
?%'
!
'
'
%%
%Z
'
Z
'
$
$
' $
XW%
['
%%
[
X ?\
X'$&]
'
%^__
_$%?
_%
_"
7_
_[ [?
?X'$&?X%
!
`&$
[a `%
['
!
b
]
'
%
^__
'_"
7_
8_'
?
?%&?
$
?? ?%%
?'
?
?
UIJcGIJVBHVF@ILBCIMBFJNAJMAGH
@ILBCIMBFJNAJMAG dAKH eIMAHFfOPAGIMBFJ gGFLBKAG OPAJ
7 _"
hX"
# i%
%b''
b b
[
" _"
hjW b''
[
`
%
!
"
_"
7h_"
#
` b
k
8 7_"
7h"
"
i%
%b''
[''
_"
7hY
`
]
b
gBPATBJA
W
b "
l
"
#hjW
`
mj
#8 ''"
#hjW i%
%b''
"
j
"
''"
#hjW ` `
!"
#
$
$
%&
$
&
'
$
()(*+,--./0*-12,/3345-,-4
$
6789:;<=>?7@=A<B7CB8@DEFG@HB><IJ7CB7=> K
&
$
$
$
L
$
#
M
$
$
$
N,4+/+/*).O45,(*PQRST/51UV0.
W
X-4-./+/Y+(T*)(-*4+0/+-/5ZY4+2-O/4+-./,(U/,-5//-(,U1 OV,*+/,,[S-Y4V\PO/.(5P-4,/\\-./]\(0/[^
_
$
$$
$$`
a b
$
$
b
$$
! KK
L$W
cM"&
d
"
&
ee f
K$
gcMhi ccj
k
$
all
m
l lM!MnMl#### #
#
#$# %&
L
$
$
gcM!$cj
k
$all
`
$
$l###
#$
#
#$#
$ #
l McM"_
K
f
e
gcM"&
cj
k
$ all
$
$ll
#
#$ #
#
#
#cM"##
$#l
qrstuvrwxyzr{x||}u~rsr |t}|trrzt|rz
rx~r tr}r~ztr{wtr{~utt~r{r wvrx{t{{ r
!" #!$ %
&'
(
)
*
!"
+
(
,
-
(
+
.//01232045607/189:;</6<1<439=0>9?8240623:
-
(
@
*
+A
(BCD*
(EED
+FFG
-
(
-
+
HI<J<2KIL06I00MNO/9>310PJ9Q2K93204R<43<61 J9Q2K93204R<43<6194MR62O<
+STU
% V !WX!
X% X %!
%%
YWXZ[
-
\]A
&S^_X
V`
$$%UX#!$
Xa%UXX #!
Xb!
"% cXV
%X
!deU%! %!#WXV!WeX%%
eUd%&[A
(
&Sfgcd
X U
cXX
c!YX
%!cXV!X&` h!
"%WX
%!
%c$
WXacd%`U
_X
WX
a
h !WX% WX %UX FFiCFEj '
k
l
m+niCFE(]
Fo+p
qrr
+r
r
iCFEr
s?9><O<430Ptuv0O<?<11t<6Q2><1 w
+
! " # $
$
%
&
'
& ()
) & *
+
+
, %
$
' - +'
+
&
# ))+*,
./012343 5 6789:;:1:<2= >?0@4/4/< AB4@7 C7D713 E34/< FGHI I080 % $
' ()
) & *
+ +
- )-
'
J K++
L
+ M)
, %
&
')
+
$ *'
& +
+', N+ -
+
O,,
PP
Q &
* $
'
+
&
*
RSSTU # RR
- *
+,
V
' $+
&
+
$$+ +
&
-
)
' +
-+ $
W$ +
)
$
+
*
+, %
' $
' *
)
*
+ +- + O
+Q
+
&
+
*
& +-
' +
+'&, %
)
*
$-
' - $$+
$$+ +
(
XUYU R# USZR RUS
[ $$+ $$+
' +
$' &
&
+
' (
*
$ O,, +
Q, N$
*
+
$
)
O,, *
+
)Q
+
++-
' +
+
-
+-
+
,
\
)
O &
- *
+Q & +
+$-
'
-
'
'
* +
++ &
*
+ )
, %
+-
*
+
-
)
'
>?0@]17 I4^^7B7/_7 4/ I4^^7B7/_73 ./012343
N$
&
+
&
'
- * $ + +
++-
+
-
+
+,
!"#$
%#
"&!" !
'(
!")# !*
+,,
+,,
-
./.0 1234567689:6;4<6=>?@72AB6<3C476D:E
F:<G::2>3H7I3<7?2J:2<:K632EJK7L:
+,,
M
N
O
OO
P
QR
S
OT
U
.V+,W
XX,YP
T
./P
ZW[
[O\]
^_T/,,0U R
M
`abcdefghijklmT..U/.XnM/.o0 .0[
[]
^
]P
Z\ R
PT/,,,U
pckqidrfsdtuvwxqj `abcdydkfifgfj
!" #
$%&'()*) + ,-./010'02(3 4%.-56*-7*%2 8 9:56-(*%2 ;0<<:%*.( ,-<=-5) >
?
?
@
A@BC
A
D
E
F
B
!G!G A
H I A
?
?
J
G
K LMNOLMPQRSMO
$%&'()*) + T-):'.)3 U-*2/=05) V-'*-6- ;5*<- T-<&*%-1 W%X/&%2-1 #
Y Z
[Z
\R\]KQ ^M_RMSM
!!Z
?
!
"
#
#
$
%&'()*+, -./0.*12)*203*45.6)7,,-0*./89.,8)*20*,03:;'()*+,30.<<1=00<8,;> ?@ABCDEF@AGHIJFKILF@A?MALMNEOIJMH@PQQMBL@AHMFKRS@NR@@T?NFUM V
HIJFKILF@A?MALMNEIATWFEFSCMO@UMCMEEAMEE
V
$30.+4-)X0<044,),-083*089-6)3-))(4;Y
Z
41X[.,-0,82,),-0(8==827<,8040\[0380*20(61,-028,1+4
$
X0X6034.8(%&',+4/031(0X)3.<8]8*9,)400[0)[<0<8/8*98*,0*,4)*,-04,300,4;^
*089-6)3-))(4.=0.*(2<0.*;>
abcdefgbhijkbielb mdemkneopbabcdefgb qrsttuvwrrtvxyzv
! "
#
$
"
%
%
&'
(
)
!
*
&
)
%
%
+
! %%
,-./0123-45/67889/01:;086;77-0/9<78748.6;778098=:>?;-5=0@99A29 "
!
9A802B/129/;068098.CD
%
!
EFGHIJIKILMNOPGFQRSFTSPLUPJVWQRFMSPLXIYYWPSGMEFYZFQ[ \;77-0/9<78748.]@38.]3869/B8]%
%
!
!
!
%
^
%
!
_F[WKG[N`FSLHZIQ[ aFKSFRFbS[SZKF cIYFKF[[PF[[HU[ dFeQFU[FJ
%
%
fg
h
ijh
!
i
h
&
%
!
!%%
>k]8808lm268]:];k 485/8B89A299A8.82.87;.8A;7858]]/09A82.82:D]2/=;086;77-0/9<78748. %
>n-99A8<2.80@9A201/01
o
pqD
!"# $%&'( )*+,"-."&&/0
& & #
0 %#
1 0%2
3%
"0. 0
#%
45*+6
"0# '"#
7%0
0.# %
02
( 1"& (
0 )%.( %#7 '%#
/# -#"&
1 3 0 #%("'
0 "0 8"&&/0
& & #
0
1 %# %# - ## 7
"%(%#3 3#"/'"-' "'( 91"# 3/(%#(
' 0
7
# .
(
0-#"0
"-
1 0%2
3%
"0 . 0
# :; <=
>
:;
=
<?
@
<=
A>
B0
1 "
1 #1%07)
1 &%C"#
"-."&&/0
& & #
0 %#
1 0 9 # 0%2
3%
"0. 0
#
D4*4*E"/
1F%0G
%078 0
#%(H%
#-#"0
I
%
7
1%
1 # 9%
%7 .# %
02
( 1"& (
0 J1
' .
%(('#"&
03)%
7
# .
"0 J1
#
/(
%# '%#
./(%#(& %0
03-/(-"#4*4*E"/
1F%0G
7/
"
1 #0 91"& (
"/
# %.1
#%
3 K7 .# %
0
1 (".%
"0
07 .%
1%
1 '"(
.1%7
0 07 7 -- .
"-# 7/.
030 %#1"& (
0 )7
'
."0. #0
1%
&% 0."/#%3 ' "'(
"(".%
0
1 %# % LMNMOPOMQRSTUPNVWXYPZ[QO\XV]XSXROO^X_ROM]X`QNNaRMOZ b ( 03
"( ("0."&&/0
& & ## '"#
1%
(
&
%
"0
91
.1.%00"
30"# 7 J1 3# %
(
&
%
"0# (%
"
1
'
"-."&&/0
& & #
91" 9 #
0.(/7 7
0
1 %0%(
6 & #
"-0
31"#1""7%
".
%
"0
"#"
1 #
&
(%#3#"/'
9 # &"# %..
(
1%0
'
.%(0
31"#1""7#
7 0
)%07 9 #
1 # -"# &"# (
c (
" %''#"%.1 7-"#
1 #' #
' .
2 d"9 2 #) ' "'( 91"1%2
1
& %07
0.(
0%
"0
" %.
2
0
1 #."&&/0
%# /0(
c (
"1"(7
1
%& 2
9 %
1 %2 #%3 0
31"#1""7#
7 0
E
0.
1 '"#
"0"-
1 # '"#
0"
/''"#
7.
7%
%)
' .
%((
&'"#
%0
" ."30
e%0
"-
(
&
%
"0
f^Z[QgaPROMOPOMhXiRPWZSMSQjkMSMlWXmQNXWXSSRXSSn o/%0
%
2 %0%(
9%
."0
7 # 7-"#
1
.
"0)/
9%
0"
'/#
/ 77/
"
1 -"(("9
037%
%(
&
%
"0
p qrss`PWWtPOPu544.%((7%
%&%1%2 # 2 %( 7'%
#0
02
( 1"& (
0 )
0. E!#
7 0
"&
&
.%((
1 0/& #
"# '"#
1"& (
u# (%
7."0. #0
d"9 2 #)
1 '/(
.2 #
"0"-
1 7%
%
7"
0"
0.(/7 3 "3#%'1
. .""#7
0%
)&%c
03
7
--
./(
"/07 #
%0791
.1.%((
""c'(%. 0 %#0%2
3%
"0. 0
#
qvss`PWWtPOPuw44.%((7%
%&%
&
(%#(1%2 0/
7
"%
'%
#0
02
( 1"& (
0 d"9 2 #)%
'%#
"-
0 %#0%2
3%
"0. 0
#
"."0
%.
w449
1 1"& (
0 u# (%
7x/
"0
%07."0. #0
J1
& %0
1%
%0
0.# %
0.%((
0
1 %# %
&%1%2 0.%/
7
1 "/
# %.1.%&'%
30#%
1 #
1%0%.1%03
02
( 1"& (
0 q_RyPNVNXROtPOPuB2 #
1 '%
2 #%(&"0
1 )
1 .
1%
0
#%.c
03
1 0/& #"-
0 (".%
70 %#4*4* E"/
1F%0G
"%
1 -- .
2 0
"-
1 #0 91"& (
"/
# %.1
#%
3 E
0.
1 .
%(# %7&"0
"#
1 7%
%)
9"/(7 # 7/07%0
"
0.(/7
0
1 # '"#
z0%77
"0)
1 7%
%
"0(
0.(/7
0.%&'& 0
%#"/074*4* E"/
1F%0G
{
0"
'"
(
" $%&
0 2
( 1"& (
0 %#"/07"
1 #
/
03
1
"/#.
!
"#
$%
&'(')*
'+
')),
-.'/.)
).'
'/
*0
1
)2''340
.
00
(
'
/'. 2,
**.2**1 '*
2
1
)
,-00
(
'
/0
01 0
,
'
-0
)+02,
(
, '
0
0
-
01 0
,'0
,
/ 0
'
(,3 5'
0''. 2+
)2
).,0
/..
'
)6)2
,.'1)0
*)''''
1237
- +0''
-00
.),1//
*/. 0 '.,23
8 9
:
"
;
*
**.2**1 ' -
,0
(
( 2)
,
'-
.), <(
,
'
).3 ='(
( 2'
)
'*+
,
' (
( 2
).'
.),0
'
/
( .''
'/
(
( 2
- 340'
)2'' 0 /
'''''
>?@A?BCDEFGH>ACI@
01 0
,(
( 2
).'3
J
K8 LMN$%
"
!OP%
9
:
"
QHRESHAEI@>?@A?BCD*(
'
(
( 2
).'- <
*,.'
0T))
- 7
*U
).V,<+
'
'
))2W
,X.','*
/*,
0
*
).'-0
01 0
,
*340T))
-7
*U
).V,<-
'
(0,/
2
01 0
,
Y0Z''
+
)[
/
\ &
(
0+
,;]Z=^/
*_
.
2`abc
d1 .
2`abe+
'0'-
'0*
' ,
)
1)3401
.,
'/
0
01 0
,+
',/,12 T))
-+
1'
0*
(
0<(
3
40T))
-7
*U
).V,<-
'
)'
(0,/
f
2-+-00' '
'
*(
'
01 0
,/
0
)2''3f
2--
'0
'
'0
'
01 0
,1
.','(
*.)())
'-00 -
', ,/
'+,
'
20
'
'3
!
"
#
$
$
%&
&
$
! $ !$
#$'! ($
$) "
%
*+,-./,0123452/4678+7/+9,:6 16/;<<+=/1+45>?69>66@ A96B+9/CD2.-+, E !
'#
$
"
$
$% F
G
$
$
"
$
#
$
%&
$
!
#$
"
$
$%
HIJKIJKLIJMNIOPQHRSMKMI
TON
IIJ !%E
! !
$
U
VWXY'
$
#
$
%Z!'
$QHRSKT
[
IKNITKN
IKIJ[KLIJ[J\KJKK "
'" $
!
$%
G
]
^
_`
$
#
! $ $
$
$
"a
b
$$ #$%& "$'
)
"
']
^
_`
$
$
# %cOIKIJPdI
Te
ILKIfcK[M
INJgMN$
!
"
#
"
$%&'(')&*+,-.+'-(*/&*'&01234+/&5&*'-*+*-*$%2'0-+4+0&+6')&0&+0&*(
7
89:9;<;9=>?@AB9CDE=FD==GH=I>G<F9B?J=A=;KLL=MN=FOPBQ9N9Q9;R
"
S
"
TUU
7
VW "
X
"
7
Y=>QLI?9=>@A<Z9C<;9=>YB>;BF?J=A=;KPPB<F;=[BGIQB\F=PBF;R]<LIB?
7
^
"
_
7
"
"
`
a
bc
!
!
"# $%
&%
'(
)"
"
&
'!&*
# (!"
'
!
+!#
! &!(!&%
&
!$$
%
&*&&
)
*
,
%&
(*
!)
$ (
(
+$
&!" !%
&&
*)#% &#
)
*
& )"%%
&
&
(
+
, -
.
/
0
1
2
345
67$
% &#
)
++
&
(
+
*
(
#
*$
89:;;<=;;<9>?9@9=A:9;BCD9=E;B;<9F=GHI=;HBFJ9F;9@CKHLD=J;CBF ) &
,M$
% &#
)
'N6O
!*!
&!(!&%
&
!*&
$$
%'6PO
!*!*!&
!(
$$
%'!&*66O
!*!*!
(
$$
%&
)
&
"!%
+
Q,M(
!""'
&*%!
! &!(!&%
&
*&!(
!
& !%&)
&
,
RB?9G9@SJBLLTFH;>L9LA9@CKBDHFHBFCBF;<HC;BDHJ(!
*
!"#)#
, U
(
!"% &#
)
+
Q&&
!
VWNXY
&&!(!&%
&
&"#$
"!
&!(!&%
&
!*!&
!(
!%&)
&
,+
"
%$%!""#
&&
*(!%!&
$
&
!
&
!
)"%Q !
&!(!&%
&
,Z%%
*&
'
"
++&
*
)"*&
+
"%!&
&)
&
*
!%(
%%
&&
!
)#' !&*!
*)
&
!*%"
$
"!
!
&
,[
&%"
!
+
*
%
&
+
!*
)
%!
$
&!(!&%
&
"$'
*
"
&!$$"!
*+
&!(!&%
&
+$
&
&*
&!!
!, -
.
/
0 \
3-
/]0
^BC;JBLLTFH;>L9LA9@C_H_FB;CD9=E=ABT;;<9F=GHI=;HBFJ9F;9@KCHLD=J;C && )
*%"
!&"&
*
&&
(
+
'&*%!&!
&!&
BFLBC;F9HI<AB@CKLHF_C`RB?9G9@S!$
+)
&*
&*
&"#,Y
$
% &#
)
$
"!
#
!+
!&+!
&
*
+!"Q
=F_C;@99;C;<=F;<9><=_D@HB@;B;<9BD9FHFIB8;<9F=GHI=;HBFJ9F;9@`ab=JE + &
+!
!&
&%!
&'
"
%
*
)&*!
$
&%!
&!&***
)
F9CC;<9@9ScC=H_BF9JBLLTFH;>L9LA9@SadB?S
e(
&f
%"
g!(!&f
&
h&*
%&
%&i
!"!#
$%
&'
'()
*+, '
-
.
/"$
."012 . 32$
42 ". .
'5
-
&
&(
5
('
63
32." # !4
/2" "
41
32/"7
"42
82 2%%"..
43!"3%#2#
..2"2$
42 ".963
./"7
/"$
%.:! "2
42%.
/%.7"3
#..
%
$
%
2#.13#2
/#
";2
<
-
=
(
(
>5
(
2$
42 ".1
##32$2/.
$
/2
43!"3%#2#
..
3 2"7
"9 ?@ABCDEFGHEIJKLAM@NEF@OEPPIQARSTQBUB@P@QR V2 43!".3#%7
"
/
.2!
-
/"../"
" /
42$
42 ".9W/##
$
42" 3X "2# Y2 "7" 2$
42 "1"4"2## .2
.7
%1
3 32
7
2%2
3 "
$%7"
3
3
.
..
9Z1$"[
!".2" 3".
.%
% 7# 3.2
12 9V2 7 3.
!".1
.3% 3
32%4
$
"2%$2
[.
43
"
/
[2%/"$
%%
"
7"
2 2!
2$
42 ".9
Y3
#
.
!".1"
" 2
2. 31
2
3.
2%$2 3 1
#%32$12 % "
$
72$
42 " /#2.[ 3 1"$" #2" 32 3 12 % "9".
% %."
!%
-
\
*] 3
^ 3
.3
#%32$#
.^1 3
2# 3
43
""%2%.
43
" (5
'*>
'&
&
>
'(
)
_
(
'5*`
(\
>
'
V2
!".7# 32 2%%
2#%
2
2$
42 ". >
')
)'
'
-
*&
//#32%2! "
%27132 32$
42 ".1"2% 3 /.7 ."$
. 3 /"$
%%[ 3"1
#% 32$!2.
3/
.3a
&5
' ".')bcbcd
ef
)
*_
>
5
#
^ 3
12.:
. 7"
4 3
. 3
4
.'
>' _'
)
-
(
(
)'
24"%1
3 3
. 2....
*
(
(
)
'
> ijklmnojnpqrjsljstpuqj stvsjstrjwpsxjklmnoj
ynvwrjzvnmrjlujlm{j
pu|p}ts~j
!"
"
#$
%&'()*+ ,-./
..
0
.
0
0
.
/
.12
3-.
.
/
0
/1,
/. .
4 0-.
.
.
.-
0
12/
.
0-
- /
.
/
5
. 0
.
3
.-
/
-6
7
8
.-
1
#$9 :
2
1;
<3=>#?1
!"
!#!$
%&'(!
)#!*
+*
'##!
+
!
*##!&!&$%&
# &,*&-
!
&!
##!
.
! *$%&
/&01.'! 2 !.3 &4.-!
5!
!
! &! $
%&2
&3
!*'$4 65&%! !
!*,#
# -**&'!
!
# *"
!
$
%&**"!
) # 7 "!8
.**"!
-! 9:'!7 "!-.!'(! "!
!! #!
#
*
!
!#!$%
"#
"&. ##! &!
!"*&!$
8
# &*&
&
!)2*
!&!*!
#8
(!
!&!!
!
$
!"#
!$
"
%%&
&%'
%
('"
(
(((%
(
)
*+,-./01.23 45678799:799;:<=8;>5?:;=@<=A979=:BC58;DE<5:9;B7?=F;5:9 G H7EI=J7=K=E9 L0-.M2N3.0OPQ2RS-SPP/N.P.P.P0PP2/.01STU.1QQ.VQQ2+P.3V/2P1PW.30TSX+01SPQS-1SNPY0/SPWTS.3P1.1+1.230-.Z01.23W03T /Q03VSP.31QS/N.R.30-[+P1./SP\P1SR] ^2.RYN2_SQ2+P.3V0`2NT0,.-.1\WL0-.M2N3.03SSTP12P1NS0R-.3S03T0//S-SN01SQ2+P.3VYN2T+/1.2303TNSSa0R.3S1QS NSV+-01.23P1Q01Q0_SQ.3TSNST3SUQ2+P.3VTS_S-2YRS31] ^2NST+/S1QS+3PQS-1SNSTQ2RS-SPPY2Y+-01.23WR2NSPQS-1SN/0Y0/.1\03T.3/NS0PST.3_SP1RS31.3/2P1bS`S/1._S Q2+P.3V0NS3SSTST] c-0NVSPQ0NS2M1QS/QN23./0--\Q2RS-SPPP+`SNPMN2RTN+V0TT./1.2303TRS310-QS0-1QYN2,-SRP]d2NS1NS01RS31 M0/.-.1.SP03T-2USN,0NN.SNPM2N1NS01RS310NS3SSTST] 2NTS/0TSPWL0-.M2N3.0Q0PQ0T23S2M1QS/2+31N\OP-0NVSP1Y2Y+-01.23P2M+3Q2+PSTYS2Y-S]e3NS/S31\S0NPW Q2US_SNW1QS/Q0--S3VSPQ0_SPS_SNS-\U2NPS3STM2N1QSf2-TS3g101S]^QSQ2RS-SPP3SPP/2+31P.3L0-.M2N3.0 N2PS,\hiYSN/S31,S1USS3ijkh03TijijWUQ.-S1QSNSP12M1QS/2+31N\Q0T0lYSN/S31TS/NS0PS]m303\V._S33.VQ1W 1QSP101SQ0PR2NS1Q03knjWjjjQ2RS-SPPYSNP23P] G;oA?7p@qF=F745678799:799C5;:Fr;:rI;67<5A:F9 dS3+ e3P1.1+1SM2Ns/232R./
*2-./\tSPS0N/Quges*tv w
!"#
!$
"
%%&
&%'
%
('"
(
(((%
(
)*+,-./012314-+567895+2497:;<+=181;;89>1+,-;9?17;<18-12;@;-1=A;811094B94-14-;A0,*893+014;0731;A+2 >1<9381;CD<7-:;7;-72E3+4-27;-F9-<G1FH+2EAF<121+48@I012314-+5-<1<+=181;;0+0,87-9+4721,4;<18-121?C J0949+4;?9>12B1+4<+F-+21?,31-<1,4;<18-121?<+=181;;0+0,87-9+4CK9;0,-1;314-1272+,4?F<1-<12-+5+3,;+4 *,98?94B012=7414-<+,;94B>12;,;;<18-12;74?94-129=<+,;94B74?-<181B789-@+50,*8931437=0=14-;C )4+-<123<78814B1891;94-<194-1273-9+4;*1-F114=14-7898841;;A?2,B7??93-9+4A74?<+=181;;41;;CL4M/M/A7*+,-MI 012314-+5788<+=181;;7?,8-;94N+;)4B181;6+,4-@<7?OPQPRP=14-7898841;;1;;,3<7;70;@3<+-93?9;+2?1274? ;3<9S+0<2149774?M.012314-<7?78+4BT-12=;,*;-7431,;1?9;+2?12CU+21+>12A7<9B<12012314-7B1+5;+T37881? 3<2+493788@<+=181;;V<7>1?2,B7??93-9+4A7;1>121=14-7898841;;A+2*+-<C U174F<981A;-7-174?8+378B+>124=14-;<7>1;014-*9889+4;+5?+8872;-+3+=*7-<+=181;;41;;CW1-F114M/XY74? M/M/A67895+2497;014-ZX[*9889+4+4<+=181;;41;;A732+;;4941;-7-17B14391;-<2+,B<\X02+B27=;]^72M/MX_C `+>124+2`7>94G1F;+=;9B41?7ZXM*9889+45,4?94B073E7B1+5*988;94M/MX-+-73E81-<1<+=181;;41;;329;9;C a9-<;+=,3<=+41@*194B;014--+3+=*7-<+=181;;41;;AF<7-721-<102+;013-;5+221?,394B-<14,=*12;+43174? 5+2788bD<9;0+893@*291502+>9?1;74+>12>91F+5-<1=7c+23+4-29*,-94B573-+2;-+-<129;94B<+=181;;41;;9467895+2497 74?<9B<89B<-;-<19=073-+50+89391;A81B9;87-9+4A74?21B,87-9+4;+4;1>1278+5-<+;1573-+2;d<+,;94BA=14-78<178-<A 988939-?2,B,;1A74?329=1C efghijklmmfnolpiqirsljoltliqlpiqirs 67895+2497<7;+41+5-<1=+;-1u014;9>174?57;-1;-TB2+F94B<+,;94B=72E1-;CW1-F114M///74?M/MXA<+=1>78,1; =+21-<74-29081?94=+;-=1-2+7217;94-<1`+8?14v-7-1C);+5U723<[XAM/MXA-<1-@09378<+=1>78,19467895+2497 F7;Z..IA///A?+,*81-<181>18;94G1FH+2E74?w8+29?774?-29081-<181>1894D1u7;]xyzz{|_C D<1=1?974214-5+27-F+T*1?2++=7072-=14-9;F188+>12Z[A///94-<1W7@)217A=+21-<74-F9317;=,3<7;-<1 47-9+4787>127B1+5ZXAM//CL4=+21-<74-F+T-<92?;+567895+2497:;}L~3+?1;A57=9891;721214-T*,2?141?7;-<1@;014? =+21-<74[/012314-+5-<192943+=1+4214-])W6M/MX_C ^9B<<+,;94B3+;-;74?78+F;-+3E+57+2?7*81<+,;94B3217-170213729+,;;9-,7-9+4A1;0139788@5+28+F12T943+=1 57=9891;74?94?9>9?,78;F<+7217-<9B<1229;E+5*13+=94B<+=181;;C ikgn oiljjrmfnlfonfflnrjrlqimfnjil
!"#
!$
"
%%&
&%'
%
('"
(
(((%
(
)*+,,-./*0+1-/2/3454--256*07-2,6583069306/.::;<9/*65=312-4/>?02,5658306/*65@A3;*=-40*37-3/2/4-7./2 B-7/306,-./5,-;6*01-85+4-C2,>D52C550EFFG306HGEI@,*+,9:3<*0+*06./24*5/587431562,58-/2J*+-4-./B-7 +4-C2,@*01;.6*0+*0=-4832*-0251,0-;-+<K.:EHI:541502L@56.132*-0306,53;2,/54J*15/K.:EGI:541502L@306 :4-=5//*-03;3067./*05///54J*15/K.:MN:541502LKAOP-J5408502HGEFL>Q0HGHE@2,5/2325311-.0256=-4NN:541502-= 2,5032*-0R/05CB-7/2,32<534> S,*;52,5,-./*0+658306,3//.4+56@2,5/.::;<,3/=3;;50/,-42-=2,5032*-03;3J543+5/*015EFFE@3/658-0/243256 *0T*+.45U>V,5/.::;</,-423+5*/5W15:2*-03;;</,34:*01-3/23;1*2*5/>T-45W38:;5@X30T4301*/1-36656UM@GGG05C B-7/=4-8HGEY2-HGEM7.27.*;2-0;<N@ZGG05C,-./*0+.0*2/K[1\.*;;30HGHGL>A3;*=-40*3430]/NF2,38-0+3;;^>X> /2325/=-4,-./*0+.0*2/:5413:*23K[1_*0/5<P;-73;Q0/2*2.25HGEYL> `abcdefgheiajeklamnocanjakbpedqalirpedstpuvcnmlauk
!"#
!$
"
%%&
&%'
%
('"
(
(((%
(
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`2:X*7+<+:/*@aa>2*18:6* b/*1/G2*60/O)cE+6<<Ad9/<02=E+<:2*A/*@H65+3QRSeWJF*3+0+*1-+/3:A:2>+[K\X</L:961:136+@125<20,6*.6<<829:6*7 O6J+JA*+L829:6*72*Y/0/*1A9*@+39:+@<21:6*/*2<@+3*+678523822@W/*@829:6*7;32^+01:*+/313/*:61<6*+:J[K\X </L:961:0/*5+.6<+@/*2*->29:<-/*@5-;/316+:/11+>;16*712/@Y/*0+/*+02*2>603/18+318/*+*Y632*>+*1/< /7+*@/A:908/:59:6*+::02>;+16123:Of+3*/*@+?QRSeTf+3*/*@+?+1/<JQRSVWJ `+76:</16Y++g231:8/Y+5++*>/@+6*3+0+*1-+/3:12/00+<+3/1+829:6*7;32@90162*A:95@6Y6@+<21:A/*@3+</40+31/6* ?2*6*73+:1360162*:12/<<2L.23>23+82>+596<@6*7Jb+*/1+H6<<MNL/::67*+@6*12</L6*QRSaA/6>6*712:13+/><6*+18+ /;;32Y/<;320+::+:.23>9<16./>6<-829:6*7@+Y+<2;>+*1Jb+*/1+H6<<VL/:3/16.6+@.293-+/3:</1+3A/<<2L6*7>/*- 82>+2L*+3:12596<@/@@6162*/<9*61:2*18+63;32;+31-23:95@6Y6@+18+63</*@6*121L2<21:Jh86<+186:029<@8+<; 03+/1+>23+18/*aRRARRR*+L82>+:18/1L29<@218+3L6:+*215+>/3,+1.+/:65<+A2L*+3=2009;/*0-3+Z963+>+*1: >/->+/*18/12*<-/:8/3+2.18/1;21+*16/<L6<<<6,+<-5+@+Y+<2;+@OG+10/<.+1/<JQRQSWJi+:;61+18+3+0+*1;2<60- /086+Y+>+*1:A18+829:6*7:9;;<-:8231/7+L6<<;+3:6:16*18+*+/3.9193+J jklmnopqrspltolns X5291aR;+30+*12.18+82>+<+::6*[/<6.23*6//3+9*:8+<1+3+@A>23+18/*6*/*-218+3:1/1+JX;36>/3-3+/:2*.2318+ :6?/5<+9*:8+<1+3+@;2;9</162*6:18+<2L:120,2.+>+37+*0-:8+<1+3:/*@13/*:6162*/<829:6*7JH+1L++*QRRa/*@ QRQRAL86<+18+121/<82>+<+::;2;9</162*6*03+/:+@6*[/<6.23*6/A18+:8+<1+30/;/061-3+>/6*+@.</1.23/@+0/@+5+.23+ 36:6*7/7/6*/B+3QRSaA/*@18+5+@029*1:/113/*:6162*/<829:6*7./06<616+:8/@/02*16*929:@+0<6*+J uvwxnlyz{lmn|nqx}k~lksv}llnwl}spltolnsonm}svovq}mtpqxsv}wm}klnm}l}osxqnovlpqxsv}w mtvrqn}vm|
!"#
!$
"
%%&
&%'
%
('"
(
(((%
(
)
*+,-./+.0.1.-234.5/267+.-/.87+977/9:59/.0;/+.8.<7=..593>7+628?@2>7,5:A,87/B9425:495C9012D9/.7950 32-,DC49E.87F+2=.-,.1.3.8495.5/+2>7,5:3->77>3328/,1.7.81,D.7,7/+.427/,4328/95/7/.3/272-1,5:D+825,D +24.-.775.77G @2>7,5:A,87/,7=2/+95,0.2-2:C9509389D/,D.0.1.-23.0,5/+.HIIJ7/+9/=82E.6824/+.420.-268.K>,8,5: +24.-.773.23-./2/8957,/,256824.4.8:.5DC7+.-/.87/2428.3.8495.5/7>=7,0,L.0+2>7,5:25-CF+.5/+.C4./ D.8/9,5D8,/.8,9982>5072=8,./C28/8.9/4.5/6284.5/9-,--5.77G M+.@2>7,5:A,87/933829D+,44.0,9/.-C3821,0.7+24.-.77D-,.5/7F,/+959398/4.5/9507>3328/,1.7.81,D.762808>: 900,D/,25950N284.5/9-,--5.77OM7.4=.8,7PJJQRGM+.7>3328/,1.7.81,D.798.3821,0.0=>/398/,D,39/,25,752/8.K>,8.0 26/+.+24.-.77D-,.5/7G S24.=.5.6,/7F.8.9//8,=>/.0/2@2>7,5:A,87/;,5D->0,5:+,:+.8+2>7,5:7/9=,-,/C;6.F.8.4.8:.5DC82241,7,/7;950 ,43821.04.0,D9/,2590+.8.5D.OM7.4=.8,7;T>-D>8;950U9E9.PJJQVW90:.//;@.5F220;950M7.4=.8,7PJHXVY>=8C./ 9-GPJHZV[>D+9595./9-GPJJIRG \.95F+,-.;@2>7,5:A,87/7+2F.052.].D/7,58.0>D,5:08>:>7.;9-D2+2-D257>43/,25;37CD+,9/8,D7C43/247;28 .5+95D,5:/+.K>9-,/C26-,6.O^27.5+.DE./9-GPJJ_V\98.7;T8..5=.8:;950^27.5+.DEPJJ`VS/.8:,232>-27./9-GPJHJRG M+82>:+2>//+.PJJJ7;@2>7,5:A,87/8.D.,1.0943-.9//.5/,2568249D90.4,D7;5.F74.0,9;95032-,DC49E.87G[>//+. 32-,DCD988,.0>5,5/.50.0D257.K>.5D.7F+.58.72>8D.7F.8.0,1.8/.068247+.-/.879502/+.8,5/.8,4+2>7,5:/2 =>,-0,5:3.8495.5/+2>7,5:382a.D/7G A28.b943-.;/+.5cS95A895D,7D2\9C28T91,5U.F72438.7.5/.09HJcC.983-95,5PJJQ/+9/3824,7.0_;JJJ5.F 3.8495.5/7>3328/,1.+2>7,5:>5,/7,5/+.62--2F,5:0.D90.G Y//+..5026/+.0.D90.;/+.D,/C+90=..525/89DE,5D8.9/,5:3.8495.5/7>3328/,1.+2>7,5:G[>/D,/C3-955.870,05d/ 95/,D,39/.95,56->b26+24.-.773.23-.;628F+24/+.28,:,59-3-95F97>59=-./29DD244209/.G M+.7+.-/.8D939D,/CF97F.9E.5.097/+.3-95?0,8.D/.0/+.e,/C/2421.,/762D>79F9C6824/890,/,259-.4.8:.5DC 7+.-/.87950/2F9807+.-/.87F,/+PQc+2>8D8,7,7D-,5,D795072=.8,5:D.5/.87GBY798.7>-/;/+.D,/C8.0>D.0QQJC.98c 82>50.4.8:.5DC7+.-/.8=.07=./F..5PJJX950PJHQF+,-.900,5:25-CPZ=.07F,/+724.D8,7,72872=.8,5: 4959:.4.5/Oe,/C950e2>5/C26S95A895D,7D2PJHQRG fghijklmnopfjopqgrqstiguvwswkxnykuvkjrzijgphvyk{|}~koj}uopkjgsz
!"#
!$
"
%%&
&%'
%
('"
(
(((%
(
)
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`_=HHH75/81+,K a0+1275/4.151,-380+12,3036Q5-3456500150045,I+,-,-5/5.6+,<3BR.6+B3/1+.-380+1295Q5637451,b063I.19 5^7510+Q5K S,,.:50.A38,B38/<5./0,3;34765,5.1.X3/9.A65-380+127/3\5;,+1,-5P.<L/5.=;30,+12.A38,YOHH=HHH,3Y_HH=HHH 75/81+,=,<7+;.66<.0,89+3=315NA59=3/,I3NA59.7./,451,cP.<L/5.R381;+6d;3134+;S10,+,8,5CHCFeK R-5.75/=B.0,5/.6,5/1.,+Q505^+0,K?3/5^.4765=.A59;30,0.A38,YO`=HHH+1.0-56,5/.19Y_`=HHH+1.f,+1<-345gh ;347.;,-380+1281+,0,-.,;.1A5i8+;:6<A8+6,cP.<L/5.R381;+6d;3134+;S10,+,8,5CHCFeK*-+65,-50537,+310-.Q5 9+0.9Q.1,.25008;-.0;/3I9+12.19/50,/+;,+Q5/8650c5K2K=1375,0e.19./5650075/4.151,3/.50,-5,+;.66<.775.6+12 ,-.16312N,5/4-38050=736+;<4.:5/01559,3I5+2-,-3050-3/,;34+120.2.+10,,-508X5/+123B75376506557+1231,-5 0,/55,K S10,.,50I+,-08X+;+51,-380+120,3;:.19.04.66184A5/3B-3456500753765=V380+12?+/0,;.1036Q5,-5j-38056500j 7/3A654K>,+66=+1,510+Q5;./5+0155959+B,-5/33,;.8053B.1+19+Q+98.6@0-34565001500+0451,.6+66150050=9/82 .99+;,+31=3/.6;3-36.A805cU5./031CHH_eK S1;31,/.0,=+176.;50I+,-.-380+120-3/,.25=08;-.0;3.0,.6R.6+B3/1+.=,-5/5+0.6312I.+,A5B3/575/4.151,-380+12 A5;3450.Q.+6.A65=I-+;-95B+50,-53/+2+1.6Q+0+313BV380+12?+/0,,3+4459+.,56<7/3Q+95.1.7./,451,ck054A5/+0= [86;8/=.19l.:.5CHHOeKL0;.8,+3159+1.mnon7.75/=,-5-+2-;.7+,.6;30,0,395Q563775/4.151,08773/,+Q5-380+12 +1034563;.6+,+50;.17/3-+A+,V380+12?+/0,.0.Q+.A6537,+31cp5/,50W.19*5+15/CHHJeK S1CHCH=316<315N,-+/93BR.6+B3/1+.@0-345650043Q59+1,375/4.151,-380+12=O_75/;51,I5/5.I.+,+12-380+12.19 0,+66.;;500+1205/Q+;50=.19FD75/;51,I5/51363125/512.2+12+105/Q+;50c>.1q305r.<3/s0tX+;5CHCFeK*-+65 I.+,+12B3/75/4.151,-380+12=+,@0+475/.,+Q5B3/-3456500753765,3-.Q5.0.B576.;5,306557Kk-563125/7537650,.< 810-56,5/59=,-543/5,-5+/451,.6.197-<0+;.6-5.6,-95,5/+3/.,50=4.:+12+,-./95/B3/,-54,323A.;:,3,-56.A3/ B3/;5=B+19-380+12=.19/52.+1B+1.1;+.60,.A+6+,<K
!"#
!$
"
%%&
&%'
%
('"
(
(((%
(
)
*+,-./0//,+1123456.3307-08,2.,37409+ :;<=>??@AB@CD>D?EFDB>G@GGDFHH>;FACDH@HBFDB;@HIJ>ABC;HJC;KCEFGFHHDFHHLMH>@>D?NCHFDKFAIOPQRSMKCETHCDFB >GUOPQVSW>E>ECBCFB>GUOPQXYUZ<[HB>DAF<HFA>D[F[CBK>A><HF>D?>;FH<GBCJKCEFGFHHDFHHL\CKDHCD>D? ]K>E[F;G>@DOPP^YU MKF;F>;F>GHC?@_F;FDAFH@DBF;E@DCGC=@FHU`DOPQXaBKFbCHcD=FGFHdCEFGFHHZF;e@AFHc<BKC;@Bf;FGF>HF?ghijkhl HKCm@D=ORTF;AFDBCJBKF<DHKFGBF;F?KCEFGFHHK>?>HFeF;FEFDB>G@GGDFHH>D?QnTF;AFDBK>?>H<[HB>DAF<HF ?@HC;?F;UoH@D=BKFH>EFH<;eFf?>B>aBKFpqrstuvwvrxyzvr{|k}i~>E<AKK@=KF;T;Fe>GFDAFGFeFG>[C<BRQ TF;AFDBm@BKEFDB>G@GGDFHH>D?nTF;AFDBm@BKH<[HB>DAF<HF?@HC;?F;UMKFA;@B@A>G?@_F;FDAFG@FH@DBKF?FJ@D@B@CDCJ EFDB>GKF>GBK>D??;<=>??@AB@CDUMKF=CeF;DEFDBHFHB@E>BFH>;FGCmF;[FA><HFBKFfCDGfAC<DBF?TFCTGFm@BK>
ACD?@B@CDLbcdZcOPOPYU cTTFD?@M>[GFcUQUACDB>@DHFHB@E>BFHJC;BKFT;Fe>GFDAFCJEFDB>G@GGDFHH>D??;<=>??@AB@CD>ECD=BKFKCEFGFHHU MKFT;Fe>GFDAF@HT>;B@A<G>;GfK@=K>ECD=BKFAK;CD@A>GGfKCEFGFHHaCeF;RTF;AFDBCJmKCEK>eFH<[HB>DAF>[<HFC; >HFeF;FEFDB>G@GGDFHHL<KD>D?]<GK>DFQXX^SC<G@DFB>GUOPQPSGGFDbCAI>;??FDHa>;FHa>D?NCHFDKFAIOPQQYU CmF;J<G?;<=HH<AK>HOEFBK>ETKFB>E@DF@D?<AFTHfAKCH@HaBKFHfETBCEHCJmK@AK>;FHCEFB@EFHACDJ<HF?m@BK HAK@CTK;FD@>U ZFeF;>GHB;<AB<;>GAK>D=FH>;F;FG>BF?BCBKFEFDB>G@GGDFHH>D??;<=>??@AB@CDA;@H@HHFFD>ECD=BKF<DHKFGBF;F? KCEFGFHHTCT<G>B@CD@D]>G@JC;D@>BC?>fU +0,1-0-5-08,./0.-08, MKFQXRPH[;C<=KBBmCIFf?FeFGCTEFDBHBK>B>_FABF?KCEFGFHHDFHHU@;HBaBK;C<=K[CCIHH<AK>Hxvzvqv vr[fcG[F;B:F<BHAKaBKFT<[G@A=>@DF?@DH@=KBH@DBCT;>AB@AFH>BE>DfCJBKCHF@DHB@B<B@CDHamK@AKmF;FA;@B@A@F?>H A;<FG>D?@DK<E>DFU`DQXRnaAKGC;T;CE>@DFL>GHCIDCmD>HMKC;>@DFYm>H>TT;CeF?[fBKFoUZUCC?>D?:;<= c?E@D@HB;>B@CD>H>DFm>DB@THfAKCB@A?;<=amK@AK=>eFE>DfTFCTGFKCTFBK>BEFDB>GKF>GBKT>B@FDBHAC<G?G@eF@DBKF ACEE<D@Bfm@BKBKFKFGTCJEF?@A>B@CDU `DQXVa;FH@?FDBFDDF?fH@=DF?BKF]CEE<D@BfFDB>GdF>GBKcAB@DBCG>mBCT;Ce@?FJF?F;>GJ<D?@D=JC; ACEE<D@Bf[>HF?EFDB>GKF>GBKA>;Fa>@E@D=>B;FTG>A@D=@DHB@B<B@CD>GA>;Fm@BKACEE<D@BfA>;FUcBBKFH>EFB@EFa JF?F;>GG>m=FDF;>GGfT;CK@[@BF?HB>BFHJ;CE<H@D=F?@A>@?J<D?HBCT>fJC;DCDFG?F;Gf>?<GBHL@UFUa>=FOQnY@D @DHB@B<B@CDHJC;EFDB>G?@HF>HF¡L`:HYU¢cHHB>BFEFDB>GKCHT@B>GHmF;FACDH@?F;F?`:H>D?@DFG@=@[GFJC;F?@A>@? J<D?HaHB>BFH;FHTCD?F?[fAGCH@D=?CmDHB>BFEFDB>GKCHT@B>GHL£FGGF;OPPPYU cH>;FH<GBCJBKFD>B@CDm@?F?F@DHB@B<B@CD>G@>B@CDaBKFD<E[F;CJEFDB>GGf@GGT>B@FDBH@DT<[G@ATHfAK@>B;@AKCHT@B>GH TG<EEFBF?J;CERR^aOVX@DQXRRBCVaOPX@DOPQUcHHKCmD@D@=<;FaBKFD<E[F;CJT>B@FDBHTF;QPPaPPPcEF;@A>DH ?FA;F>HF?J;CEVV@DQXRRBCQQ@DOPQLMC;;FfFB>GUOPQOSM;F>BEFDBc?eCA>Af]FDBF;OPQ>SZcdZcOPQYU dCmFeF;aBKFe@H@CDCJT;Ce@?@D=A>;F@DBKFACEE<D@Bf?@?D¤BE>BF;@>G@F>Hm>HTG>DDF?UMKF@DA;F>HFCJ[F?H@DBKF ACEE<D@Bf?@?D¤BDF>;GfE>IF<TJC;BKFGCHHCJ[F?H@DT<[G@AEFDB>GKCHT@B>GHUeFD@JmF>??>GGCBKF;[F?Ha @DAG<?@D=CDFH@DT;@e>BFKCHT@B>GHa=FDF;>GKCHT@B>GHm@BKTHfAK@>B;@A<D@BHa¥cF?@A>G]FDBF;Ha>D?OnKC<;;FH@?FDB@>G B;F>BEFDBAFDBF;HaBKFBCB>G[F?HBK;C<=KC<BBKFAC<DB;fmF;F>[C<BQPaPPP@DOPQnaACET>;F?m@BKCeF;RRPaPPP@D QXRRLZcdZcOPQYU ¦@BKBKFAGCH@D=CJHB>BFTHfAK@>B;@AKCHT@B>GH>D?@D>?F§<>BFACEE<D@Bf[>HF?A>;FaHB;FFBHa¨>@GHa>D?T;@HCDHK>eF [FACEFBKFDFm>HfG<EJC;E>DfCJBKFEFDB>GGf@GGU ©0654+ª«¬59+48®¯,°.-0+,-10,±5/07*+,-./²81°0-./1°+4³´´µ¶9+407.,1
!"#
!$
"
%%&
&%'
%
('"
(
(((%
(
)
*+,-./01-+2+31/456478-/1+9-:8;41+8-/12-:4:4-138-8<8-/1+,-=+8-/1+1:;+3;+:+3;/08+>4/.+:<,873?6;-+80-6 @4:3AB66/0:-1>8/+CBDE38<:?FG6H+-148+,AIJIIKL*+,-./01-+-3438-9+84:8/;+M4+3;/08.+,,/.NLOPO+6<84+1:3<@Q +6<84-17+8-418@4:3+1:ILRPS6/99<1-8?043-:418-+,@4:3AT;49+>1-8<:4/.8;438+84U3144:./0+:<,873?6;-+80-6 @4:3-34574684:8/>0/2/M408-94A V;/08/.73?6;-+80-6-17+8-418@4:3L4940>416?0//9:/68/03/W41;+M4,-88,46;/-64@<88/04,4+349418+,,?-,,7+8-4183 2-8;-1+.42:+?3AV/947+8-41839+?@404.4004:8/+6/<18?/070-M+84+>416?./0;4,7AH<88;48-94+1:4X/08-88+Y43 8/+664338;/34340M-6436+1@4+@+00-40./09+1?A Z1046418?4+03L8;404;+M4@4417/,-6?4X/0838/+,,/29+1+>4:6+04/0>+1-=+8-/13FG*[3K8/0464-M4G4:-6+-: 04-9@<0349418./0+6<8473?6;-+80-66+04AH<88;+86+0445841:38//1,?\]:+?37409/18;FT04+89418B:M/6+6?*41840 IJ\P@KA ^_`abcde_df`dghijkjlbfbjdmn Z18;47+38:46+:4L*+,-./01-+@4>+141+68-1>,+238/04./098;460-9-1+,o<38-643?3849+1:04:<647/7<,+8-/13-18;4 38+84U3/M4060/2:4:70-3/13AH<83/94+:M/6+843+1:7/,-6?9+Y4031/2046/>1-=48;+8,4>-3,+8-/19+?@4;+M-1> <1-1841:4:6/134p<41643./03/94;/94,43374/7,4A q-8;8;438+84U370-3/17/7<,+8-/132/,,418/14+0,?\ONLJJJ-19+843rIJJ7406418/.6+7+6-8?r8;4*+,-./01-+s<@,-6 V+.48?C4+,->19418B68FBH\JRK2+37+334:-1IJ\\AT;4,+294+18,/2Q,4M4,/X41:4032/<,:1/20464-M4341841643-1 6/<18?o+-,/01/1Q6<38/:-+,9+1:+8/0?3<740M-3-/10+8;408;+1@4-1>34184164:8/38+8470-3/1A T;044?4+03,+840LM/84037+334:s0/7/3-8-/1NOL2;-6;046+84>/0-=4:3/941/1M-/,418/X41343.0/9.4,/1-438/ 9-3:494+1/03AT;-3-16,<:4:@<0>,+0?+1:8;4W<1:40tR]J+1:7/33433-/1/.6/180/,,4:3<@38+1643-16,<:-1>6/6+-14L ;40/-1L+1:948;+97;48+9-14Fuvwxwyz{zw|}~KAZ1IJI\LVAHAOS2+33->14:-18/,+2L2;-6;.<08;4041:4: 9+1:+8/0?9-1-9<9341841643@?>-M-1>o<:>43:-36048-/18/>0+1870/@+8-/1-1384+:/.o+-,8-94./01/1M-/,418:0<> 60-943A BH\JR+1:s0/7/3-8-/1NO04:<64:70-3/1/M4060/2:-1>L+004383L.4,/1?6/1M-68-/1L+1:,/1>-16+0640+8-/13FH-0:48+,A IJ\Ps48403-,-+48+,AIJ\NG//14?48+,AIJ\RKAH<88;4,+23+,3/04:<64:8;41<9@40/.74/7,4>/-1>8;0/<>;:0<> 6/<083r+1:@4-1>+@,48/+66433340M-6438/;4,738+@-,-=43/@0-48?A [M403441@?+o<:>4L+:0<>6/<08344Y38/;+014338;46/406-M47/240/.8;460-9-1+,o<38-643?38498/7403<+:4:0<> /X41:4038/0464-M4804+89418FAVAE47+089418/.4+,8;+1:<9+1V40M-643VIJ\PKAZ.8;4?7+338;4:0<> 804+8941870/>0+9L8;4-06;+0>43+04:-39-334:AV8<:-43;+M43;/218;44X468-M41433/.:0<>6/<083/1-1604+3-1> 804+894186/97,48-/1L04:<6-1>046-:-M-39L-16+0640+8-/1L+1:3<@34p<418:0<><34F /88.04:3/1LD+o+Y+L+1:4+0,4? IJJSq-,3/1LG-86;4,,L+1:G+641=-4IJJPV4M->1?L<,4-;+1L+1:40:-YIJ\SH4,41Y/Ls+8+7-3L+1:0416;IJJ]KA BW408;47+33-1>/.s0/7/3-8-/1NOL9+1?/.8;/34+,04+:?-18;4:0<>6/<083?3849@4>+1:0/77-1>/<8/.9418+,;4+,8; +1:3<@38+164<34:-3/0:40804+89418AG/04/M40L8;41<9@40/.-1:-M-:<+,304.4004:8/804+89418@?8;460-9-1+,o<38-64
!"#
!$
"
%%&
&%'
%
('"
(
(((%
(
)
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`-3,14@-*1BC1.-0-**8-***7AA-*,,C-*107,@18* /4-/0*12@O-4*-9a10@3+./K-4**C1702318*@2-4/31.D@8/,@181B*,4/,-A@-*,C/,/224-**,C-C17*@8A*C14,/A-/8231*,* @**7-*/82,C1*-,C/,,/3K0-,C-.-8,/0C-/0,C/82247A/22@3,@1834@*@*9 bRcYTXdZ[e[SRfg[X^ E,4-/.0@8-/82-_?-2@,-,C-/??41O/0?413-**B148-FC17*@8A?41`-3,*9 E@.?0@B+B782@8A/??0@3/,@18*B14/P142/D0-C17*@8A?41`-3,*9 h_?/82?-4.@**@D0-4-*@2-8,@/02-O-01?.-8,1831..-43@/0?41?-4,+5G-,3/0B-,/09:;:<>9 h_?/82,C-7*-1BIhij-_-.?,@18*9 j.-82Ihij,1-0@.@8/,-,C-/7,1./,@34@AC,1B/??-/0B14.-4@,0-**3/*-*/82,1?4-O-8,/.D7*C-*@8FC@3C30/@./8,*4/@*-@**7-*,110/,-5k10K-+:;<l>9 mn[S^[\YoTX^[\TgnRcYTXdo]XZ]S^[\X]^Te[nRcYTXdRf^TRXY h_?/82*C-0,-43/?/3@,+J@83072@8A318A4-A/,-/82818H318A4-A/,-*C-0,-4*9 p.?41O-,C-q7/0@,+/82*/B-,+1B318A4-A/,-*C-0,-4*/82-0@.@8/,-788-3-**/4+470-**73C/*4-*,4@3,@18*18?-,*9 rC-8,C-4-/4-*C-0,-4*?/3-*J,C-s4@AC,H,1H*C-0,-4t*C1702D--8B143-29u,C-4470-**73C/*81?7D0@32-B-3/,@18/82?7D0@374@8/,@18*C1702D--8B143-2,1/224-**,C- q7/0@,+H1BH0@B-@**7-*9 p834-/*-,C-2-O-01?.-8,1B@881O/,@O-J31*,H-P-3,@O-C17*@8AJ*73C/*,@8+C1.-*/82.1270/4C1.-*9 a41.1,-*C/4-2HC17*@8A/82318*@2-44-273@8A,C-@.?0@3@,,/_18C17*@8A*C/4@8A56-Juvw0/C-4,+J/82x1*-8C-3K:;<;yh00-8/82uvw0/C-4,+:;;=>9 Q[\g]X[X^YcffR\^Te[nRcYTXd I18273,@8H2-?,C4-*-/43C18,C-018AH,-4.17,31.-*1B?-4./8-8,*7??14,@O-C17*@8A5aE6>J,1782-4*,/82,C--P-3,*1BaE6180/D14B143-?/4,@3@?/,@18J247A7*-J/82 ?*+3C@/,4@3*+.?,1.*9 I178,+A1O-48.-8,*318273,*@,-@8*?-3,@18*18FC-,C-4,C-aE6*C/O-/*7P@3@-8,*,/PH,1H30@-8,4/,@1/82FC-,C-4C1.-0-**30@-8,*0@O@8A@8aE6*3/84-3-@O-,@.-0+J /2-q7/,-,4-/,.-8,*B14,C-@4.-8,/0@008-**/82247A/22@3,@189 z[X^]Sn[]S^n^\[]^g[X^ p834-/*-?*+3C@/,4@3D-2*/,,C-/37,-J*7DH/37,-J/8231..78@,+4-*@2-8,@/00-O-0*5,1?4-O-8,.-8,/0C-/0,C?/,@-8,*D-@8A4-0-/*-2?4-./,74-0+>9 {1F-4,C-D/44@-4*B14,C-C1.-0-**F@,C/.-8,/0@008-**,1*--K,4-/,.-8,5-9A9J*C14,-8,C-F/@,,@.-B14@8,/K-*,1/331..12/,-,C-8--2*1B.-8,/0C-/0,C?/,@-8,*>9 Ijxh5I1..78@,+j**@*,/83-Jx-31O-4+|h.?1F-4.-8,>I174,J/8-FB4/.-F14K,C/,v**,@0078B102@8AJC/*,C-?1,-8,@/0,1?41O@2-7*-B70,110*,1C-0?,C1*-F@,C*-O-4- .-8,/0C-/0,C/82*7D*,/83-/D7*-?41D0-.*9 w14@82@O@27/0*0/3K@8A@8*@AC,@8,1,C-@4@008-**1478/D0-,1/33-**31..78@,+,4-/,.-8,O1078,/4@0+J{/74/v*{/F*C1702D-@8O1K-2,131.?-0,C-.,14-3-@O-,4-/,.-8, 2-,/@0-2@8,C-/**@*,-217,?/,@-8,,4-/,.-8,5juN>142-49 }*-{/8,-4./8Ha-,4@*HEC14,5{aE>318*-4O/,14*C@?*B14/270,*F@,C*-4@17*.-8,/0C-/0,C@008-**/82A4/O-0+2@*/D0-25@9-9J3/881,,/K-3/4-1BD/*@3J?-4*18/08--2*B14B112J 301,C@8AJ14*C-0,-4>9 ~\cd]ZZTU^TRX L7@02,C-@8B4/*,473,74-B14/22@3,@18,4-/,.-8,@8*@2-C1*?@,/0*,1D41/2-8,C-/33-**,1/22@3,@18,4-/,.-8,9 {1F-4,C-D/44@-4*B14C1.-0-**247A/22@3,*,1*--K,4-/,.-8,*5-9A9J81,4-q7@4@8A?C18-3/00*,1D-,C-B@4*,*,-?1B-84100.-8,*@83-./8+C1.-0-**C/O-81-/*+/33-**,1 ?C18-*>9 p834-/*-,C-87.D-41B,4-/,.-8,B/3@0@,@-*,C/,/33-?,G-2@HI/0JFC@3C31O-4*.1*,C1.-0-**?-4*18*9 p834-/*-,C-87.D-41B,4-/,.-8,B/3@0@,@-*F@,C2-,1_D-2*/824-*@2-8,@/03/4-,14-273-F/@,,@.-/82/3C@-O-s,4-/,.-8,182-./829t G/K-/??41?4@/,-7*-1B247A3174,*,1@83-8,@O@-?-1?0-@8,14-3-@O@8A/8231.?0-,@8A/22@3,@18,4-/,.-8,*9 p.?41O-/33178,/D@0@,+D+-8B143@8A,C-0/F18?-,,+[email protected]*JFC@3C/4-7*-2D+*1.-C1.-0-**?-4*18*,1*7*,/@8247A7*-C/D@,*9 ¡ ¢¢£¡ £¡ ¤¥¢¡
!"#
!$
"
%%&
&%'
%
('"
(
(((%
(
)*+,-./0/1)2-34-5*,-67-89:-6;*,<,,6-==*6>=?+=;*67-?=-*:86@;2-28:-,-==383?,*;<86/ ABCBDEFGHBIJDKLKKIBCCMENODPNCBQKFRGRKDPNCBSRJBC T0UV84;2-W2486<7*,,XY8:-,-== Z[\]^]_`[a\^]b cdeefg hijbklb]m\^_n[onm^]lb^o[nbpknbqbkbrb]m^asaa]bnn hdetuvwxyzu{||}\prbabnns]~\sa^_baj\s^ mkb^mrb]mr^ml\b__sn^osasmsbn ~p[as]^[skb bmk^[^]_`[a\^]b c d
g
jbklb]mc_s^]pnsnp nbksp[nrb]m^asaa]bnng fjbklb]mckblpk_np n[onm^]lb^o[nb mkb^mrb]mg h
uvwxyzu{||}\prbabnnjbknp]ns]
~\sa^_baj\s^ _b]n^kbn^]_ pnb]\blc
ddg htjbklb]mijbklb]mijbklb]m hduvwxyzu{||}\prbabnns]m\bddnsmb `paa^opk^msqb]sms^msqbp]`\kp]sl prbabnn]bnn TU;2-4Y8:-,-==6-==*:3,-= pobkmnp]apm]sl ^]_bnmbkbamcdeehg
ijbklb]m ijbklb]m
`p[]ms_bjkpo^osasmn^rjabp\prbabnn ^_[amns]a^rb_^`p[]m`^aspk]s^c]itg [km^]_kp]c
dgihjbklb]mifjbklb]mtjbklb]m ef\prbabnns]_sqs_[^ans]m\b^msp]^a [kqbpprbabnnnnsnm^]lb~kpqs_bkn^]_ `asb]mnc~`g p[]m^s]^]_pbn c
g fjbklb]m
fe\prbabnnjbknp]nbkbs]mbkqsbb_s] ksm^s] p\]np]^]_ `\^robka^s]c
fg jbklb]m
ed\prbabnns]_sqs_[^an^m\bkb_^mmp nbkqslb^b]lsbnpks]sm\jbpjab^mksnp \prbabnn]bnn^]_m\pnb\p^kb^lm[^aa abnns]baop[k]bmpobkbjkbnb]m^msqbp m\bs]]bklsm\prbabnn _b]nZ^njkpn^s ^]_pnb]\blc ddg fjbklb]mijbklb]m d
e
it\prbabnnqbmbk^]n\p[nb_ rb]m^a\b^am\nbkqslbn p]mprbkbm^a c dtg ijbklb]mcbqbkobb] mkb^mb_pkrb]m^a\b^am\ jkpoabrng h
jbklb]mcn[onm^]lb ^o[nbg dhjbklb]mc_k^] ^alp\pabqbk_^s] m\bj^nmrp]m\g ife\prbabnnjbknp]ncdhtd[]n\bambkb_ ddhfn\bambkb_gkprtlprr[]smsbn obmbb]
f^]_
d\pkbnjp]_b_mpm\b d
prbn[a]bk^osasm]_bn[kqbs] m\b¡ r^nmbkbm^ac dhgf
jbklb]mffjbklb]miejbklb]m di\prbabnnjbpjab\pbkbpom^s]s] \b^am\l^kb^mmplas]slnsmbnpm\b^]m^`a^k^ `p[]mprbabnn~kpk^rc f¢
d
i¢
dg psb^]_£^np] c
dfg ijbklb]m hejbklb]mcn[onm^]lb ^o[nbg
t\prbabnns]_sqs_[^anb]lp[]mbkb_^m^ _kpjs]_^lb]mbk^mbrjpk^ks]mbk pqbk]s\mn\bambkpkp]m\bnmkbbm
!"#
!$
"
%%&
&%'
%
('"
(
(((%
(
)*+,-./012314256426748/9-5- :;<;=>?@A@BBC@DEFG@B <HIJ>DFIKLMNOPQ MRS@DG@TILB@DF>HBUA>TVW I@D?G>TXFIF>TBQ OYS@DG@TILB@DF>HBU A>TVWI@D?G>TXFIF>TBQ :;<;G>TIFTHH?>ZG[D@L\>\Q]>FTIWFTW^F?@ @BIF?[I@B :;<;=>?@A@BBC@DEFG@B <HIJ>DFIKLMNMNQ MRS@DG@TILB@DF>HBUA>TVW I@D?G>TXFIF>TBQ M_S@DG@TILB@DF>HBU A>TVWI@D?G>TXFIF>TBQ :;<;G>TIFTHH?>ZG[D@L\>\QS>FTIWFTWIF?@ @BIF?[I@B `E[TBU@I[A;LMNOPQ MNS@DG@TILB@DF>HBUA>TVW I@D?G>TXFIF>TBQ OaS@DG@TILB@DF>HBU A>TVWI@D?G>TXFIF>TBQ MNO_]>FTIWFTW^F?@@BIF?[I@BZD>?XFb@D@TI G>TIFTHH?B>ZG[D@L\>\BQ cdefghijkelmnfljikfnlmomnpiqferfljikfdsqtiuklmqlpndrdpvwrffkeoxlefkjlkfqdmydomezomzwoxfqlelefmqedjf pd{ftjfnlikf|o}erfqlelsdnikdmkftodikndmqoeodmkerleplkepdmueftxdt~ftxlmfmeplmq|oo}erf~domezomzeoxfqlel klx~pfomnpiqfklpprdxfpfkkkrfpeftfqlmqimkrfpeftfqomqooqilpk{oerlmq{oerdienropqtfm 115215/. \JD>TFG[AAKJ>?@A@BBFBX@ZFT@X[B[S@DB>TJ>FBJ>?@A@BBZ>D[IA@[BIOK@[D>DYB@S[D[I@>GG[BF>TBFTIJ@A[BI K@[DB[TXJ[B[BHBI[TG@HB@XFB>DX@DUB@DF>HB?@TI[AFAAT@BBUX@E@A>S?@TI[AXFB[FAFIKU]^CUG>VTFIFE@F?S[FD?@TIB ZD>?D[FTFTHDKU>DGJD>TFGSJKBFG[AFAAT@BB>DXFB[FAFIKL=MNNPQ;T\[AFZ>DTF[UGJD>TFG[AAKJ>?@A@BB[GG>HTIZ>D >T@WIJFDX>Z[AAJ>?@A@BB; ^J@X@ZFTFIF>T>ZBJ[B@@T?>XFZF@X?[TKIF?@B;@I@@TOPaa[TXOPU[Z[GFAFIK[BX@@?@X[TFZFI[B AFG@TB@X[B[SBKGJF[IDFGZ[GFAFIKU[GGD@XFI@X[B[SBKGJF[IDFGZ[GFAFIKU>DHTX@DIJ@HDFBXFGIF>T>ZIJ@BI[I@B?@TI[AJ@[AIJ [HIJ>DFIK;<@DOPU[Z[GFAFIK>HAX@GA[BBFZF@X[B[TFZFIJ[X?>D@IJ[TOaSBKGJF[IDFGID@[I?@TI@XB; ///2/. <\;MNMO; ¡¢ £¤¡¥¦§¨£©ª «¬£ £®¯<\_:>B<TV@A@B;°@DH[DKPUMNMO; <HDKU^F?U][HA[±>@DFTVUCG>II²@AXJHF³@TU\[D>A`;<X[FDU´F??K>HDµH@U´FT>FBI[BF>U`DFG:[IF?@DU@I[A;MNOa;¶ ·¸«¹£©«º»¼½¸¡¥§ «¾«¿¶£ «¨£¤¤¸¡«º¼ £«¤£¡« ½¤££¡À¡¾«¿¬£ ¸ ·£¡«Á¡£® ¯yknroletonhftonfka_LQÂM_RÃO; [K<D@[\>HTGFA`G>T>?FGTBIFIHI@;MNMO;ĺ¶ £½¤££¡£ÅÆ£ÇÈ ¥£¡ÉºÊƣǬ¸«¡®¯ @A@TË>UCI@E@TUÌFGJ>A[B][I[SFBU[TXFGJ[@A°D@TGJ;MNNR;ÍÉ¡¤ÉÄ£¡£«¢ ¸¥¼ £«¤£¡«Å¶ «É»£¨£Ç «¿£Í¨À£¡É£ ªÉº·Î£ ÏÐÑÉ£Ò¸«É£ª ¥ ¤®¯ÓvhvÔÕÖÕ×onfdsÖikeonfytdutlxk; FDXUF[UC>TK[^[Z>K[UØKË@T±D[II@IU[TX²F@IÌVHK@T;MNOa;=>=[B]D>S>BFIF>TY_<b@GI@X\[AFZ>DTF[ÙB´[FA ]>SHA[IF>TÚ¯MN; >F@U>TTF@=;U[TX:[HD@T²[AË:[B>T;MNO;È¡¥«¿£Û¸¡£ Ü«ºÁ¡À£ÝÞ«¶£«¿£½£«¿Æ££À ½¤££¤¤¸¡«º®¯ÖditmlpdsßdxximoeàflpercitkomuRLYQÂOPÃPR; DH[Ë@DUFGJ[@A;U`AA@T<;<?[I@[U`XFA^>DD@BWØFE@D[U;[EFXFAA@DU[TX:[HD[Ì[>DB;MNO;Ä £ ¡À ¬¸¹¹ ««¬¸Ü«¡É£¶Ü¸£¬£ ¨É£È£¶¤¡¥½¤££¶À¸«®¯ÖditmlpdsáqqoneodmkâÕ×fmqftßdimkfpomu YLMQÂOÃP; HGJ[T[TU[EFXUØ>?FT[ã@@U:[HD[C;C[X>BËFU[TXF[T[±[DGF[;MNNP;¼¿£½£«¿Á¤¹É«¬¸¹¹ «¨£½¸¡¥ ½ÁÛ©ª«¨£½¤££ª«£¡«Å¶»¡À¤ä£À¡« £À¼ ®¯áxftonlmÖditmlpdsyijponàflperPPLCQ Ca_RÃN; HDIU[DIJ[Ø;U[TX:[HX[T<D>T;MNNO;½£¹¡¥¶¤£ ɦ½¤££;^J@D[TTBIFIHI@]D@BB; K?[BI@DU<TV@A[U´>KG@\JHTVU<TXD@[[TË@U=@@´[@\J>FU[TX\J@AB@[:[FDX;MNO_;¶ª£À« ɪ £ ½¤££ª«£¡«¡¬¡Ò£Ê ¡®¯ÖditmlpdsàflperßltfsdterfyddtlmqÓmqftkftfqMLOQÂRMÃPR; \<±>E@DT?@TIU@ID>S>AFI[T^D[TBS>DI[IF>T\>?FBBF>T;MNOP;¾¿É¿Á¡À¸« £¶ £ £«¡¥ å¡¥ÒÜæ¯ ²FI[ACFVTB; \FIK[TX\>HTIK>ZC[T°D[TGFBG>;MNOY;¬¡§ ¡Éɦ¼£¡©ç£ ª¡«Í¡À¿ ¡É½¤££¡£Å¶¡¡¨£ º »£¹ «¨£ ¡¥èèé«è鮯C[T°D[TGFBG>=H?[TC@DEFG@B<V@TGKU\FIK[TX\>HTIK>ZC[T°D[TGFBG>;
!"#
!$
"
%%&
&%'
%
('"
(
(((%
(
)*+,-.)//+,01.2+-34-5678.94:;<-4=.4,*>7?+6@A1>7-+,B+:;1CDEE1FGHHIJKLMKINIOPQRHMLNJSTHSLNUVGPSWXKJSY ZINNSJMSU[KHLRK\KM]^SNSOKMH_KM`aKHbIOcIdS\SHHNSHHLdINeVSMSWLNHfghijkljmnopqrstmqpusqkvvnownsqxCD yz{|}EC~E1 )*+,-.)//+,07:;46*.A/=,146+-.4,*>7?+6@A1>7-+,B+:;1CDEE1FZ`WINKJL\\]cIdS\SHHIdSNaSIWMcKe`aLMSH IOPQRHMLNJSTHS WIR\SdHQKXL\SNMMIZ`WINKJL\\]cIdS\SHHSNfgsljqxjpuwixxtjxCEyz{|~1 )//+,.,6=*7/*.4,*6+,*4,/4B+6@1CDD1F7:=4/6764-4,*7-+B7/*=+|)=*+,:+67+876; =@1g ¡s¢tupwnsq£jxjpmoipqv¡suno¤£j¥nj¦C§y}{|~}D1 )4,-.2=//=41.¨4=* 1B=/=5-.4,*36=-@491>©=,=1CDE1FaSUQJKNeLNU WSXSNMKNecIdS\SHHNSHHªGaSXKS_IO M`SXKUSNJSLNUZ`LWMKNeLaSHSLWJ`GeSNULfg276;=,45+6C§CC1276;=,45+6+6=+-14@=7,4/6+47 ):7,7=:>+-+46:B1 7,@4=,.94,+.4,*44,@B478+-1CDD}1cIdSLNU[W]«cIdS\SHHNSHHLNUPQRHMLNJSTHS107,*7,|4@=7,4/ A**=:@=7, +,@6+1 +//+6.9+©6+01CDDD1F¬J\QUKNeNHMKMQMKINHOIWSNML\[KHSLHSH®WId®SUSWL\aSKdRQWHSdSNMOIWPSWXKJSHª PMWLMSe]IW¯WLeSU]«g¡x¤oinpwmno°jm¥nojxzEyEE{|E~E}D1 7@@6+*-7,.¨+,=-+ 1.@4:14±4;4.4,*677;3+46/+1CDD1F²SJMKXSNSHHIO[WQe¯WSLMdSNMZIQWMHªXKUSNJS OWIdLaLNUIdK³SU¯WKL\´fgµmnlnqsus¶¤·¡t¸uno¡suno¤CyC{|EE~§1 46.94,=+1CDCE1FGQUKMªZL\KOIWNKLP`IQ\U¯WLJbcIdS\SHHPSNUKNe¹PSM I\KJ]fgk¡ºj¦x.CDCE1 +.=,B4.6+,*4,/4B+6@.4,*>7?+6@A1>7-+,B+:;1CDED1FHP`LWSUcIQHKNeLL]MIaSUQJScIdS\SHHNSHH« ¯`S²SJMIOcIQHS`I\UGWWLNeSdSNMHIN®IWdSW\]cIdS\SHH SI\Sfgrstmqpus»stxnq¶¼osqslnoxEyE{|E~EC1 +6,4,*+.9+,,=+61CDE1F 4/=76,=4),=67,+,@4/½4/=@A:@048-=@-4,* 4/=76,=4-7-=, 6=-=-1gpxwnq¶x ¼q¥nmsqljqwpu¾p¦rstmqpuC}yE{|zC1 +6,4,*+.9+,,=+6.¨4=*6=+*4,.@+5B4,=+¨++66+64.4,*7//4,*¿3,=B@1CDE1FNM`SÀLdSIOM`S NXKWINdSNMªÁKMKeLMKINGRQHSTNUSWZÂGfg è1CDD1F¯`SJÄKNNS]YVSNMIcIdS\SHHGHHKHMLNJSGJMGHGdSNUSUR]PfÅÆǯ`ScIdS\SHHdSWeSNJ] GHHKHMLNJSLNUaLKU¯WLNHKMKINMIcIQHKNeÈcGa¯cÉGJMIOÊËËÆfg ,@+6.464B1.07=-1¨4=-.>7-4,,446@.4,*-4,<6,+61CDE1FdLJMIO WIIHKMKINÌÍINÁIHGNeS\SH ZIQNM]ÎSWLMKINHLNU^QUeSMfg>A¨ 765764@=7,1 97B,-7,..4,* B6=- B4?+6/4=,1CDD1FcIdS\SHHNSHHLNUPQRHMLNJSGRQHSª`KJ`ZIdSH®KWHM«gktxwmpunpq °sonpusmϧEy}{|}C~z§1 3+6@+-.@+4,1.4,*4/912+=,+61CDD1FcIQHKNeM`SZ`WINKJL\\]cIdS\SHHªcKe`cISH¹ZId\S¬aSL\KMKSHfg rkÐkDEyE{|ECC~C}1 37/;+.¨4,=+/1CDE1FZÂGªcI_MISNUMHKNJSÑIQZLNÒMNUMfgÓmpq¶jµstqw¤£j¶nxwjmy?/7{1CDE1 3B,.>1.4,*¨11 /B4,+1E1FG\]KNeZ\QHMSWGNL\]HKHMI¯SHML¯]I\Ie]IOcIdS\SHHNSHHR] LMMSWNIOP`S\MSW TMK\K³LMKINªaSHQ\MHOWIdM`SGNL\]HKHIOGUdKNKHMWLMKXS[LMLfgkljmnopqrstmqpus»µslltqnw¤¡x¤oisus¶¤C§yC{| CD~C1 0AA1CDCD1FÊËÊËÔWSLMSWÁIHGNeS\SHcIdS\SHHZIQNM[SdIeWL`KJPQWXS] LJbSMfgCDCD1 46+-.A/=,.6+6++,?+6.4,*>7?+6@>7-+,B+:;1CDD1FcT[ÕccPÕVGZI\\LRIWLMKXSNKMKLMKXSMIcS\NUZ`WINKJ cIdS\SHHNSHHªHP]HMSdNMSeWLMKINGHHIJKLMSU_KM`Z\KSNMÎQMJIdSH«gÃ11¨+546@+,@7+4/@B4,*4, +6=:+-1 :4=,.>4,31.97,4@B4,1 4,@76.=:7/+31)?+6B46@.B6+41=/7/.4,*,6=*)-@64*4Ö¨46/+1CDCC1FGUQ\M H]J`KLMWKJ^SUZLLJKM]¹ÀSSU¹LNUP`IWMLeSHMKdLMSHKNZL\KOIWNKL×ÊËÊØfg>A¨ 765764@=7,1 :½=//4,.0486+,:+91CDCD1ÙcI_MIaSHMIWSM`SZL\KOIWNKL[WSLdªaSdIXKNeÎRHMLJ\SHMI®LHMLNUG²IWULR\S cIQHKNe[SXS\IdSNMfÙ,*+5+,*+,@,-@=@@+1 :3=,-+/7?4/,-@=@@+1CDE§1FZ\IHKNeZL\KOIWNKLÒHcIQHKNeÔLfg:3=,-+¿ 754,1 +@:4/.+,.¨4=*46:=4.4, 46/@7,.45:64Ú04?-.4,*34@+4:46/4,+1CDCE1FA--+--=,@B+Û=4?=/=@7+8 7-=,55/Ã,*+6 4/=76,=4-+,4@+=//1ghjmqjmµjqwjm»smstxnq¶qqs¥pwnsqÜݵÞjmÏjuj¤.CE1 7,@7+6.A,,)/=4?+@B.¨767@4;78=4;.9+--=:446:-.4/7846*.4,*¨+,,=-1 /B4,+1CDE§1 FcIdS\SHHNSHH¹TNH`S\MSWSUPMLMQH¹LNUaKHb®LJMIWHOIWIWML\KM]fg¡t¸unojpuwi£j¢smwxEEy§{|§z~C1 77,+.A/--4 1.<76-@+,1+=/4,*-.)6=:=4,,+//4.+B4,¨1766=-.94:ß+/=,+</-;.4,*146=4/761 CDE1F²SJMHIOLVIMSWNKMKLMKXSIN[KHLWKMKSHKN QNKH`dSNMPSXSWKM]OIW[WQeβSNHSHLJWIHHZL\KOIWNKLZIQNMKSHf g°sonpu°onjqoj·ÐjvnonqjCDy9,+{|~E1
!"#
!$
"
%%&
&%'
%
('"
(
(((%
(
)*+,-../01-23/45-.-3453.617+,.819/39:;2-6<-=,2>?@AB>CDEFGHIHIJKLMNOPFQNFIRSTMDIKHKQMGMIKUVOPMTTHI WFQHXOVIHFKOYIXOVGUOQHPZFIRUVOPMTT[\<,2],.,^_,9`,2a12b3c/;9,2d^e`f,;9g-219h,9`> i3:d,``/j,=123fk>/<,9l3h-9m>n,9c11:/39:o3hp>q8,h=,2-8>?@Ar>CsOtTHIJuHVTKvMKTYKTDwHRMIPMxFTMFIR yOGMIKtGxtHQRT[\z9{|}~~>) a12:9-g,28-`^i2,88> i,`,28-.-3/p139/o323=32=39,./p1f9o<5`.,2/032]m,.:h39/032-3hn-9:8/k,g-9;p3819/_12-99,k,,./03``p )c,98/39:_3h:,9-.]-9>?@A>COHPMTXVOGKLMuHMQRsOWFQHXOVIHFKFMLOQRMVTHMUtQHPFXMKZ MFQHJIGMIK[ \||}> i15.-9/o`,f,9>/0326,..303d5-2,/o`,f,90,`235 /39:j,99-8i>_5.f39,>?@A@>CMVwHPMSTMFIRWOTKTXOV UMVTOITDEMVHMIPHIJWLVOIHPsOGMQMTTIMTTHIULHQFRMQLHFUOtQFKHOIxFTMRKtRZ[\~ ¡¢~£A ¤AA¥¦A@§¨©§B> 1=,2`819/0>p>/_>ª.1`9-6]/39:>«,8`,2a,.`>A§§¬>CVtJSTMHTOVRMVTFIR®VMFKGMIKWOIKFPKFGOIJsOGMQMTT RtQKTHIQFGMRFWOtIKZ¯WFQHXOVIHF[\°±|}|²}³{¡B¬¤?¥¦??A©?B> 18,9f,6]/1=,2`/«,8.,^k3821c/b-9:3m2-8h39/39:«,9b-57032,8>?@@¨>CWOTKD´MPKHwMIMTTOXtOVKMR sOtTHIJXOVsOGMQMTTUMVTOITµHKLyMIKFQYQQIMTT[\°¡¢~|²¶~ ¡ £@¤§¥¦§@©rA> 1`fc,../p193`f39>?@A§>CNFIRSTMUOQHKHPT¯sOtTHIJWOTKT¯FIRMJVMJFKHOIHIWFQHXOVIHFWHKHMT[\_<,2],.,^ q,29,2_,9`,2a12n158-9d> o0no>?@A£>C·FKHOIFQyMIKFQsMFQKLMVwHPMTtVwMZ¸·ys¹º»¼½¯FKF¾IyMIKFQsMFQKL®VMFKGMIKuFPHQHKHMT ¿WxsÀFKF[ \ o39j-,d1_159`^>9>:>CUVOOTHKHOIÁÂuÀ[\o39j-,d1_159`^41g,29h,9`/)Ã-6,1a`f,i5=.-6j,a,9:,2> 66,88,:03^A@/?@??> o39p18,03^12Ä8)Ã-6,>?@?A>CWFQHXOVIHFÅTxHJWHKZyFZOVTxOQRQZTKFKMNMFRMVTXOVMPOVRNMwMQutIRTKODIR sOGMQMTTIMTT¿¾´HPMOXKLMyFZOVNFKMTK·MT¿WHKZOXFIÆOTM[\_-`^1ao39p18,>?@?A> o,g-d9^/;2-6b>/<2-39k>m5.,-f39/39:m239]>m,2:-]>?@A¨>COVtJWOtVKTMRtPMKLMSTMOXYIPFVPMVFKHOIÇyMKF IFQZTHT[\|}|²È±}~A¤£¥¦A£©?r> o`,2d-115.18/-6]^/_321.^9o>j,c3/412:19q399,2/+396^_f35/0-],i,``/39:p1b^99_199,..^>?@A@>CRRVMTTHIJ KLM·MMRTOXKLMKVMMKsOGMQMTT[\É||}|²Ê{¡¨§¤A¥¦¨©Ar> q3^.12/036>?@Ar>CWFQHXOVIHFÅTsHJLsOtTHIJWOTKTWFtTMTFIRWOITMËtMIPMT[\b,d-8.3`-g,93.^8`*8)Ã-6,¤b)¥> qf1h819/193.:4>/0,.39-,0>«3../;.-39342,,98`,-9/<2-:d,`m>4239`/39:j,=123fo>n38-9>?@A¨>CtTKFIPMSTM HTOVRMVTFIRUOwMVKZFTUVOTMPKHwMUVMRHPKOVTOXuHVTK®HGMsOGMQMTTIMTTHIKLMSIHKMRKFKMT[\°± |}|²}³{¡A@¨¤o?¥¦o?B?©BB> q122,^/m5..,2/j12-8m5..,2/p,Ã2,^4,..,2/_32.3p361=8/39:k2-8`-933d18`3>?@A?>C·OOOGFKKLMYII®VMIRTFIR WOITMËtMIPMTOXWQOTHIJUtQHPUTZPLHFKVHPsOTHKFQTº»»Ìº»¼»[\q2,3`h,9`:g1636^_,9`,2> q2,3`h,9`:g1636^_,9`,2>?@A£3>CMVHOtTyMIKFQYQQIMTTUVMwFQMIPMHIÆFHQTFIRUVHTOIT[\ ÍÍÍ>?@A£=>C®LMyMRHPFHRYyDEPQtTHOIFIRyMIKFQYQQIMTTHTPVHGHIHFKHOI[\ q83-/p36]/39:1=,2`>18,9f,6]>?@Ar>CHTuFPKOVTXOVsOGMQMTTIMTTFGOIJSMKMVFIT[\Îϱ|| ¢Ð~¨¬¦A¬¬©§r> q8,h=,2-8/o3h/b,^.345.652/39:032-3+3]3,>?@@>Cn158-9dm-28`/_1985h,2_f1-6,/39:n32h,:56`-19a12 n1h,.,88z9:-g-:53.8«-`f3j53.j-3d918-8>\°±|}|²}³{¡§¤¥¦£rA©r£> >o>j,32`h,9`1an,3.`f39:n5h39o,2g-6,8¤nno¥>?@A£>CDNÑY·®DD·®Y¾·¯®D®yD·®¯·y·vDyD·® ¾uSx®·WDSDY¾D[\z9°ÏÏ|°±ÒÓ¡}|¶Ô~Î||°|¡|ÕÖ}~Õ Ï{¡>«38f-9d`19/j>_>¦>o>j,32`h,9`1an,3.`f39:n5h39o,2g-6,8> «-.819/j3g-:<>/)lh322f0-`6f,../39:j12-8b>036k,9×-,>?@@£>CZTKMGFKHPMwHMOXVtJWOtVKD´MPKTOI MPHRHwHTG[ \|}|²Øαȱ|| ?¤¥¦r§©B¬> Ù3h3h1`1/^3,/p36]+,,:.,h39/b-..-394,.=,2d/4,23.:k1h-98]-/o`,g,9of1`3c/39:Ù585],q85d3c3>?@A§> CTTOPHFKHOIMKMMIsOGMQMTTIMTTFIR¾HOHR¾wMVROTMFIR¾HOHRMQFKMRsOTHKFQRGHTTHOITÚDGMVJMIPZ MFVKGMIKHTHKT[\|ÛÊÏ??¤j,6,h=,2¥¦AA?rBr> ÜÝÞßàáâãä p-3.5bo`2,,`,2 åÝæçèéêÞèàëìêÞí 03^/?@?? -,c`f-8i1.-6^<2-,a
!"!#
!!"#$%&' (%")*+'",*-%.* .&!% .!% ")**,%&".!%
)%"*#'* /0"1%)*!
23*&*4 *" !&,! +! *" &*5 6%2 789 :8
9 3*&&!!!4*4 !!*5 *'&! &*5&*% ;<=>?@<AB?C@@D>"E&*5)'%%
F5*0"G*! /3*%HE&*5+!* IAJ=?KBJ>DLM(& + , "#$*!) " F N% O
(!!,*5 PA@JQ?RDSM-%.* T'*H*) " !& ,! +! * U<=RADLQ?SSD@ASM.*"E** 5//. I?VRCAP?LWXD<S", )* "/5!),%
Y@<V>JP@DDSZAL>"#$%&'F N% O
(2+2"3*5*%
+&*%!*EH!*.&! E&*5 [?\]?^^D@"(% 1%_)*! %" O%&E&*5.* I?ASSDYA@=R\D@"+ 3H%F N%")!!EH YDSY<@`DJ"+ .*F N%")!!EH UA@a?>YCVRDL"O(b. O%*"(% c+,d+* -&!*!.&!*b(%c+,d * EH!**E&*53*' ICV><SDUA@=CV".5H(%"#* +HH&* .*"3*%2 I?JU?VDV"(% EH!*1% 3*&"G*!)!!*%#*EH!* [?\<eC<AU?VV"d&**+#F")!!EH fRDLLJg?@>h"(& #$%&'(% .!%
" +!* EH!iGj4k
lD>D@mAWC"EH!.!%
(%"+
F4!* PDD>AmA?"(%"#*+HH&*
.*"3*%2 nAS<DLfAoD@M)*(%"E&*5*/%! .!***5"O!***+HH* U?LLJpAV?ZlA@`"d(& +HH*"G j4+
(H* EH!,'% nRA`VR<`Dp<=`@D\A",*(& EH!* *E&*5"F N% /)*5!+ qr
st
789
)+&*%!#%*H%3*&u %*!4H!**,*d*%% )23*&N"
)EH!*
) 15*!- 15*!+"!*vwxy" &*'!%!'%'* Hc2,2(H* E&*5*c* ('!H*%&&%!*5*! *& )uH!%23*" $H**! &*5!H*"! 4**5!!%"!!' )uH!*%2 c2,2(H* E&*5*c* ('!H*uiEc(k.*z*zHi.3k*E&*5 3*'* +&*iE3+kH
{&*' &% &
2d.3%&*"Ec(H* %%* ! &**5! H!*i22"%&*k%*&%%&*&*5 **5* *&
2(&*H!5
" .3%&**!
H0H! &!**** "* !
!'5*N%*!
&*%&*! *&H !!!$*%H!* '%& *5! 2Ec(!! 5* !
H&!!
*5 %*%%&* i252"*vz|$*,*d*%%k2E'"%& .3*E3+H!5%**% *5*"
!!* " *" &% %H* **%&*
2 )*! %H H* *' H N%!*'%**5 !H*6&%*"*%!&*5}*5*" (2+23*5*% +&*%!*EH!*"Gj4 +!* EH!"Gj4+ (H* EH!,'%"*O%&(H* E&*5*+HH&* ('!H*2
!" #
$ %&'&()*+&(,-............................................................/ 0123-456&7&--(&--85+&95665(3( 9:73;5+(3:<................................................................=> 012?(-1&7)&+&,456&7&--(&--3-85+& 95665(3(9:73;5+(3:..............................................@A
B C D
E#F
GHI
J KLG
G
GM N L #F
L#GMO PQQ #F R #F#L GSH
!"
#
$
%
& '$
%
(
&$
)*!! )*!+ $
,-!**
.
!)-/*!
&-.
!&,
0&1&2
3
4235
& '
6
%
7
&$
)*!) )*!+$
%
7
!**
)
)*!) )*!+
,***
89:;<=>?:@<AABCD EF:GBDHC:BIJFKA:L:JJMKM<LB=>KN=KOBD>JLBCP:CQL:JJJF:L=:C:OQBNO PCKR>NPSBJ=:C=FBN:?:CT:SKC:UG:=R::NVWXYBNOVWVWQ=F:GBDHC:BIJ FKA:L:JJMKM<LB=>KNPC:RTDZQ[Y[>NO>?>O<BLJ=KB=K=BLKS\]QXX[^ B;;K<N=>NPSKCAKC:=FBNB_<BC=:CKS=F:PCKR=F>N=F:=K=BL`U@UFKA:L:JJ MKM<LB=>KNUa<C>NP=FB==>A:Q=F:JFBC:KS=F:GBDHC:BIJFKA:L:JJ MKM<LB=>KNR>=FK<=B;;:JJ=KTBJ>;JF:L=:C>N;C:BJ:OSCKAZYM:C;:N==KY\ M:C;:N=Q=F:F>PF:J=CB=:>N=F:`U@U b
cdefb
ebceebcgebchebcfebcfebci
jcbbk lcmcbbk fcnlbk gbmfbk ogbk
pqrstuvwxyz{tuy|s}}~zuy~q
z{quts
y
cdil cdfmcdil cdbimcdf iiimcdbi bmiii ~zuxt °±²³´µ ¡¢£¤¥¢¦¤§¨©ª«¬®¥¯£ ¶·¸¹º»¼»½¸º¶³µ¸¾±²·´¼¹¿´±·±À¼´Á·»Â¼Â²Âµ
!"#$%&'()* +
,,
-%*.*/--
,,
0
---
,
- ,,,,,--
,
,1,-1 ,
-1,- ,
- ,
-,
,* 2--1,,-
,
1
,
- ,,,, 0
,
,
1
,
,/-
- 3 ,1
,
- ,,,, 4,5*#67(/
- 51
-
-1,
-80+
,
596:/*#."
,
/ ,1
,1, ;
-1,
,
, 9</*=-
, 3
5
, 4
04,5
>
1
,
*%,
,
1
- ,/-
1
-1,
5080+- ,, ,
1
,
097<* ?-/ ,
-80+-,
1
0,-
,
,
-1, 1
!"#$%&'7)*@-
-,
;
,
,,
-
, 1 1,,
1 ,
-A
5,,
-1,/
- --A
,
80+-,1
,
-1,
,
-
-
-
-,
,
- ,,*2-,1
-,
-
-1,
,1 ,
- ,, ,
,80+,
,/
,/ &B,
-
-
,-
,-
1
-C
0
."
,
/-
-,
-080+C1
0
-5
,
,,-
5
05
-,
,
05
-1, ,-
-
-80+ C1
,*
2-80+5
-,
-1-
-
-1, - ,,,,
0
1,
5,
5
*2-%*.*5
5 ,4
0A
-
-5
,1
-1,,
-7:D,*2-.
C
,E
F1
0
;
-1, ,
--1,- ,
--,
,3
- ,,/
3,
5
-,
E,G7
A- ,,,, ,* H
5
,,
-5
0,
3-1,
,
1
I8
7::: 66/
-80+-51
:</
1
,
-1,
-
0
-,
J
KLMNJ NLNJJ OLKNJ PPLJJJ PQLMNJ PRLNJJ PSLKNJ KKLJJJ KTLMNJ KMLNJJ KJPJKJPPKJPKKJPQKJPTKJPNKJPRKJPMKJPOKJPSKJKJ UVWXYZ[\]^_`V]VXaZbYWVcd]^PJefg]^`hhi]YWj]VXY klmnopqrstkuvwxopvyz{pz|}ow}~povzpz|}nlzmvzpompz wtp|poq
_]^c]V]hX]^Y hh\]^_`V]VXaZbYWVc
¡¢£¤¥£¦¡§¨©§§ª«©£¬¬£¢ ®©¬¨®¯ ©¨°£¯ª«©£ ±©§¤²©¤±©¥§³«¡£££ ¶Pµ ´SPµ
! "#$
! "%&'(&#!
)
*$
) +,
"%"## ) %#( !,#,"%!"$ ,
# +-
"( !,
)"$.///// #,"%!"$",
"%"## $"# "!#0% 1
$
! "# !,"2&3$"4"&
$"+$**% +( !,#, 1! +
1!"
!$
!
$& %"+%") $
"!1
$,
(!
+"!,""1
!
*$ )! 5!
1* 4%
#*
"#4&,
"%"##$"# "!#- 6,"+$
( +,
"%"##"##
$ # # !,"2&3$" "%#"(,"$" 0% 1
$ ,#%"!
$""(" !"$"#! #,"%!"$
!"*
%
"##
,#!,
#" 7"(8
$90 !& :##
, #"!!#!,"; #!$
!
10
%
4 -0$"! + #,"%!"$
!"1
$!,"2&3$"(
%$"< $"#!!" %"+ #%!
!
"# +
!"
$"!""1
$
"
"! +"
&
$1!1 +
"
, #
( **$
)% 1$
!%"#!=>?
12&3$")
!"$#-1!,"
!" *$
*
#%
%# $) )"!,"
"$
#)"!
@*
!#%
+ !,!*!,
% +!!
9#!,!
!"#
"! !,""A*"#"
1*"$
"!,
# +!,""A*"$ "
"
1
!,"$#,"%!"$
!"B $ #
!
# !,"-C- #!$
+%&# ++"#!$"+
%
!"
%$
!
%%& $"
" #,"%!"$",
"%"##"## !,"2&3$"-D"
"#!
!"$"+
%#,"%!"$
!"!,! #"!,"
4
!&
"%
%4"#
%"1
$**$
A
!"%&
E=FG
%%
"@!
"
* !%"A*" ! $"# EFH.
%%
%#*" +
#"$)
"#
+"
"!- I
(")"$ "$#,"%!"$
!"!,"2&3$"J# #,"%!"$#&#!"
(
%#!" %&
$"#" # 5"
#! %"##!,"$"+
!
9 !
%
"# $"#!
*$")"! ,
"%"##"##1$
$$ + !,"'$#!*%
"!
"A* !# )"!
$&
1*"$
"!,
# +!
$"!" "A !#1$
!,"#,"%!"$#&#!"
-D, %"7"(8
$90 !&@ #!&%"#,"%!"$
!"%
"(
%
*$
)"
!
# 1
$!,"2&3$"J#,
"%"##4&*$
) +
"##!
4#
# !!
#"$)
"#!,"2&3$",#
**
$! !& !,$
+, !#"'
!
1#,"%!"$,
# +*$
!#
1 %%!&*"#!
*$
)" *
"A #! +
"%# 7"(8
$9 0 !&"%#"(,"$"-D""#!
!"**$
A
!"%&E-? 4 %%
"@!
"
* !%"A*" ! $"#E=-G4 %%
%#*" +
#"$)
"#
+"
"!( %% $ +,!@# 5"!,"2&3$"J# )"!
$&
1#,"%!"$,
# + *$")"!
#"$)
"#1
$==- 6,"2&3$"J#,
"%"##"##
$ # #(#
$"!"4& *
%
&1 % $"#!%%%")"%#
1+
)"$
"!K !"$)"!
# !%%%")"%#
1+
)"$
"!$""""!
#
%)" !-
L
M
NL
NM
OL
OM
PL
PM
QL
QM
RSTUSVWSXSYWSZ[\SRST ]XST^_`^a VaTUXS Va`US RaTaZS RSTbSU[aRaWSTa bSX_T cSdS efghijklmjinopqrstupvjwjgfptxyzph{ftg|jj}{~yypuxfptxt} jivf{s{{hj}nphtnkkkr
T_U`[XZ_UU[\ [XZ_U```[\ST\Xa[^U[\ L
OLQLLLNLLNOLNQL
R]SYX[S
¡¢ £¤¥¡¦§¨¡©ª¨§£«¨£¢ ¬®¯°±²±³®°¬®´²¯µ¶²·±¸²¸¸ cZ¹[Xaº[XZ_U`»U¼a`ST\`
!"#$
%&'() *+%'&','
( ( -#. ! $
,#"/0
,#" 1
2#
&'
( 3
%!"#34 5'()"#34 6'(7$
8#9'"" )# :;#
!# < 5.#",#
=# 1 !'(1
88%(',7 :;#
!# <
>?@ABCDEAFDGHIABAJHAKLML@ANFDFNINCDONCPFNINQBFKAJRBL@AEFSADQBROIKLTUAOFCDQBFKAFMOADRLAOFDGHCKVT W?@AOIBCLFRDGALXAADCQBRQRMCHLRGIFHOYKRDSABLYRBFDMLCHHCIDFLCDOL@AOCLAL@CLMCFOIDFLFMRQADAO Z[C\]BACRDH\ ^]MMINAMW_`MaICBAJRRLBRRN _WbZNRDL@MJRBMCHADAERLFCLFRDc>WbW^NRDL@MJRBHRKCHCQQBRSCHMcdb>WNRDL@MJRBKRDMLBIKLFRDTeRXABBCDEAFDKHIOAMOAQBAMMAONCBVALSCHIAMBAMIHLFDEJBRNfghijb>kCDOAPQAOFLAOQBRlAKL CQQBRSCHMIDOABQADOFDEHAEFMHCLFRD dm@ADKRDSABLAOFDLRLBCDMFLFRDCH@RIMFDETnRLAHMCDOURLAHMNC\CHMRGAKRDSABLAOFDLRQABNCDADLMIQQRBLFSA@RIMFDEYCHL@RIE@L@FMFMHAMMKRNNRDT opqrstuuvwrxxyszp{t|yr}p~qy}z~wppz
sty~
2#
)#*
&,/&+
,
#*,6'8#
8 (,.&
$
%&'()67;#
,' "1
88%( "
%""1
88%( "
3#2#"
;8#(,1
&,!7
%*,67;#
,' "1
88%( "
%""
'2 ,#
%""
'2 ,#
%""
'2 ,#
,' "1
88%( "
,' "1
88%( "
¡¢£¡¡¡¡ ¤¥¦£¡§¡¨¡¢ ¨¡¡©ª ¡«¬¡¡¨§ §¡©¡©¡©©¡£ ¡¡¨¡ª¨ ¡¨¡®¡¯ª°¡±ª¡²« ¬¨¡£§¡ª ©¡¡£¡¡¡¡ª¡ª ¡¡§³ª¡¡ª¡ª ¡§¡¡ª¡« ¡ §¡ª¡¡¨¡ £©« ´µ¶·¸¸µ¹º»¼½·¹¾¿ À ÁÂÃÄÅÆÆÅÇÈÉÊËÊÌÅÈÍÌÉÊÎÌÈÊÊÇÌÏÊÌÈÐÑÒÇÓÌÔÊ ÕÇÎÌÖÌ×ËÈÐØÌÆÙÒÌÚÅÇÈÉÉÔËÆÌÅÈÍÌÈÊÇÒÅÌÉÇÛ ÉØÌÆÊÌÒÉÜØÇÝÉÅÈÚÜËÈÐÙÒÌÍÌÈÊÅÇÈÙÒÇÚÒËÎÉÞ ß¡à©¡á®¡¯ª°¡ ¡ª¢¡¡©¡ ¡à©¡¡«à©¡¡ª ¤â¦£¡¡©ª¡¤ã£¡äåâ¦â¥³ â¦â⣡¢®¡¯ª°¡ ¡³¨ªæ¡¨ ©¡¡¨ª¡¡ª³¡¨ ³æ¨¡¡©ª ¡¨¡¨ª« À ÁçÃÄÅÆÆÅÇÈÒÌÚÅÇÈËÆÌÏÙËÈÉÅÇÈÇÛËÛÛÇÒÐËÄÆÌ ØÇÝÉÅÈÚËÈÐÌÎÌÒÚÌÈÔ×ÉØÌÆÊÌÒÉÝÉÅÈÚÊØÌèË× éÒÌËêÌÚÅÇÈËÆÕÇÝÉÅÈÚëÅÈËÈÔÌéÝÊØÇÒÅÊ×ìèéÕëéíÞ ¡¤¥¦£¡ °ä ª¡ ¡ª¡¡³ªª £¡¨¡¤â¦¦¡¡¢¡ ¤î£¡©¡¡ª¡¡© ¢³¡§³ª¡¨³¡§³ª¡¡§³ ª¡¡« À ïÊËÊÌÙÇÆÅÔ×ÔØËÈÚÌÉÊÇÄÇÇÉÊÉÝÙÙÆ×ËÈÐÒÌÐÝÔÌ ÙÒÌÉÉÝÒÌìËÈÐÔÇÉÊÉíÇÈÒÌÈÊÌÒÉ °¡©¡¡ª¡§ ¢¨ª¡ð«±«¢¨ ¡¡©¡« ¡©©¡¡¡
!
"
!
# $
%
&'
!
# $
(()*)+,
!
" -"
!.!
/
!0$
1./0$2*
3
! !
&4
5
!
"
-
!
35
16#7* $% 28
39
16#):*' 28!
! 1$# ;,)*< !28 %5
"
"
!
-
55
!16#,*4
2& = >?@AB?CDBECFEGGH?GIJDFAHC@HKLEK@?MNEK@HKL IO?CJ?GI .
"
!
-
"
-
& /
"*
P
!
*
5
55
*
!
3
Q
! 9
*
!
&4
5
"):
56
4*
"R 3!S
"
5 T & = UDBAICHVHJ?@IAFIH@H?IDKJO?VDIJODAIHKLW FAG@?K?@NDNACEJHDKI 6
!
5
% !
3
!55
!
"
5
55
!
5%"
&X! 3!
5-
3 3
# $ "
* !
";:
5
!&4
5
Y:
5-
Q
!5
55
!
! 5
!
Z:
5
* Y:
5
!
;:
5
&
= UACC[UAK@\?BJHDK] X"
!
5 !*# $
"
5
&^
*_&6&!
"
-
3
"
5
5
55
! )7,:&<!! 3 5 5
!
"
# $
5
5 6
!"
$
T
5 1
!
;:
5
2
!
" !&<
*
5),
$
T
5 5
6
!"
*4
!
5 !
5
;
& = `KKDaEJHa?\JEJ?EK@bDBECcNNGDEBO?IJDbEK@ dI?>?LACEJHDKefKgDGB?V?KJ X- !
!
5
"9
5
5
5 "
*5
5
"
4
!
"
%
!*
*
"
&'
!
!
!!
!
*4
5
5
!
5
*
5
! 5
!
"
5 5
!
5
!
!3
& 4
T
*
5
&<6
- !
"
!
-
1$#7ZY2
-
55
"
5
" !
* .h&4
!
-
""
5
5 - !
!
! 5
5i "&#
&
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
!"#
#
"
"$ % &"
"&'##$
"
$!
'
$($')"
&'!"*+"'
"" ,-&$"
./0123456789:;<=<>7?3:3@@A7B1:98/7CDEFEFG HIJKILIM %NOHIJKILIM PQRSTUVWXYZQ[\]^[\^_[`UaQR\]bcbc d\efgh[hViegdSUeaQR\T[fjTQ\Q`[Tk\h][]R]U lmnnlonlpnlqnlrnn
rnqnpnonmnn stuvwsxttsuyz{|}~{~{tu~y~~zs
|~tut
~tu{tuv~uyyztu~t|z}~ut|vyt~}vy
¡¡¢ £¤£¥££ ¦§¨©ª«¬®¯°§±²³´±²´µ±¶«·§¨²³¸¹¸¹ º²»¼½¾±¾¬¿»½º©«»·§¨²ª±¼Àª§²§¶±ªÁ²¾³±³¨³«
! " #$%
" &'(!(" )(*+(,( " -
! .%'(!/ -!''
! 0
!!$(+'
1.('" .2
'(/$'+2
(
! #$!3$%"
2 4(5" 6(
2 !5!#
#(''(
17%6%2" ,
!" 8%(!5$
!
& 0
(*
1.('*,$(42" (!#
$5
! (!7%(!4
4
9
! &'(*$/(
! (!(
'(%(
! $('$1)(4*("
(!7%(!4
4,( &%$("
&!5$'$
! " :$;<%=
>?@ABCDEFGHIJKGLCJCMMNOP?HOQRC@?GSTUVUVW )('! 2$'$%$/ )('
2$'$%
XYZ[\]^_`abcd`_e^ZcZ`fcZ_\Zggbchf^d` icgd]`jklmnc\Z_o\Zop\b`fcgZ_qrqrsie`t_`d`[ulZae`t_`d`[v wZ^txa\ajy^xwd`^fcgZ]\tz]cZcb\]YZa_\_g_` {|}|{{~}~{{}{{}{{}{{}{{}{{}{{
}
{{||}{{{
¡¢£¤¥¦§¥¨§©¢£¤¥ª«¬£©©§©©§¤¢¡¦®¯¦°±²±²³´¤¢µ¶§¤ ·¢¦§¡§¶±²¸² ¹º º »¼½¾¿ÀÁÂÃÄżÆÇÈÉÆÇÉÊÆËÀ̼½ÇÈÍÎÍÎ ÏÇÐÑÒÓÆÓÁÔÐÒϾÀÐ̼½Ç¿ÆÑÕ¿¼Ç¼ËÆ¿ÖÇÓÈÆȽÈÀ ×Ø
×{Ø
×Ø
Ù|Ø
Ù|Ø
×Ø
×
Ø
×|Ø
×Ø
!"# " $
%&
#'(
)#&
! *+
#$$,+
--.
$./ -+
+
0+
1 #$+
2!"3 $%
456789:;<=>?@A=B9@9CCD98EFGH9C5I9J>CKLFLFM NOPQOROS )TUNOPQOROS VWXYZ[\]^_`Wabcdabdeaf[gWXbchijk lbmnopap\qmolY[mgWXbZanrZWbWfaZsbpcacXc[ tuvwxyz{wuu{|w}~}zyuzu~u~yyx}w~} y{{}zu}wy{~yxyv~~{~~{ux}zy{}zyvvw{ xyz y
vu}wy{y{~}u}~tuvwxyz{wuu~ }}wz|vuz~}{zyxyv~~w{|ww|uv~ z yzuvvz~w|{}~zu}yxyv~~{~~u{| }vuz~}y{{}zu}wy{yxyv~~w{|ww|uv~ w}y}~v}zy{w}w~u{| zwy{~u{zu{w~yw~wz}uvv}w|w}yz tw}u{|}w~}zw}yxtyvwuxyz}w~} y{{}zu}wy{yxyv~~{~~w{}{u}wy{w}u{}u tvuzuu{|vu|uy{}w~uv~y~}zvw{w}w y{{}zu}wy{~yxyv~~{~~zvu}w}yy}z zwy{~ z{}zw~w{uzuyv~~{~~w~~ wuvv uvuzw{|}y}
zyvwxzu}wy{yx{~v}z| yv~~{~~{{~v}z|yv~~w{|ww|uvw~ u{y{yz~w|~w{u vu{y}u{}xyzu{ uw}u}wy{~u~u}{}uz uz~w|uvyz uu{|y{|wv|w{}{u{|} {zyx{~v}z|yv~~uzuz~w|{}~ w{zu~| z{}xzy ¡}yw{|ww|uv~ w{v|w{u¢ z{}w{zu~w{u{}utvuzuty{} u
z{}w{zu~w{u{zu{w~yty{}u{|
z{}£
w{vu|uty{} wwvuz w{zu~~w{{~v}z|yv~~{~~zxy{| v~zw{tuvwxyz{wu|zw{}u}~u}w zwy|w{v|w{u
z{}w{zu~w{¤y~{v~ty{} u{|u¢¥
z{}w{u{wyty{} ¦wvuzyv~~{~~z
z~{}~}zyw{
y
vu}wy{yx{~v}z|
y
vw{}uzu zzu{~}wu}|¡¥
y
vvww{w{wv~ uzy~~}uzuw{¢z
z~{}w{
z{} yx}}y}uv{~v}z|
y
vu}wy{yz¥
z{}yx }}y}uvyv~~
y
vu}wy{wvw~}y~} yy{xyzyx~v}zxyz y
vyw{uw}
vw ~
uw{zuzuy{}§
}xyzu{}utvuzu ty{}zwvz~w|{w~}~y{|y~} yy{z yz}|xyzyx{~v}z|yv~~{~~ u£yzw}yxuzuy{}w~z yz}}u}wv z~w|{}~z
z~{}u}vu~}¨yx}wz{~v}z| y{w}w~w}u{©u}y|y{}w{}u} ª yx y
vy~v
y}|yyz~w{uw}wv~~yx }uzu~v}z| z{}yxw}~yv~~
y
vu}wy{}vy~}zu}uy{zwy{~ «wvzu}~yx{~v}z|yv~~{~~uzw|v uzy~~}tuvwxyz{wuu{|w}~w}w~u{|zwy{~ ~}u{|y}xyz zyw|w{xuzxz~v}zy
}wy{~}u{ xy{|w{y}z~}u}~¬~}
z{}yxyv~~ tuvwxyz{wu{~uu~~}yz{~v}z~ vu~}uy{}~}u}~u{|xuzvy}uzu ¥ z{}{u}wy{w|y}~w|tuvwxyz{wuy}uv tuvwxyz{wu~w{uwvw}}y zyw|~v}z}yw}~yv~~
!"
#!
# $%& '
()*+,-./0-,1-234562*-)27285-93-,-:;<=-9-880<>+963)<2?@A@B?@?@ CDEFGHIJKLMDNOPQNOQRNSHTDEOPUVUV WOXYZ[N[I\XZWFHXTDEOGNY]GDODSNG^O[PNPEPH
!"# "$%
"
&'()* +, "
!-
.#,//
!0&
'( )*,/
#"
# / /1-
# "
! "
2!34
.#$5 * #
/.#( "
$6
/
# "//
!&+ %,/
#"
"
37
#"( '()*.
6#.!" 14 $5
!8
&.# " # "( 9$+$ !#.# #$ :;<=>?@A@BBC@BBDBE>F@ G>??>CDCGHADI>FCDH J" 9+! !"!#&! # !
### ! &!! " "&
""$
K.#&! L
M& #
!N!
& ! !#8 !
!2 !#!/$%! "& 0 #
" ! &
" /&"
" /! .# / "/ #"
9$+$
##
( ""
"$ OPQRSTUVWPXYZRQVP[\]Z^RUXVZP .# !##( "/ ! /$M _
` /M
a#8b`Mac& !
!.#, (
2!3d
(1e4d44&2!-1
# / #( d44
( !
/!34_
$d5 ! (
!
! L
M$L(d4d4f& L
M-3&44(2!
/
d3&e4( ! !&#$32#/ !# ! $3M 9$+$g/" hM &i__J! j $- # ! ( ""!  k
lmnok
nklnnklpnklqnklonklonklr
slkkt ulvlkkt olwukt pkvokt xpkt
yz{|}~}~
|~zz~}|
lmru lmovlmru
lmkrvlmo
rrrvlmkr kvrrr ~}
¹º»¼½¾ ¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª¢¢«¨¥¬®«¤¯£°±²³´µ¶·®¸§¬§ ¿ÀÁÂÃÄÅÄ ÆÁÿ¼¾ÁǺ»À½ÅÂȽºÀºÉŽÊÀÄËÅ˻˾
!"#$%!&
'
()
*
+
+
,")
)" $
+
)
-
)
!"./0/
/01
.
!2
3
'
+'
00
)
)
'!/#
+
000
+
'
+ '
,0
)
)45(&6789:" ;
+
'
+*
'
'
+
)*
3 7+
<
+= 2
47<=2:"7<=2
+
+
++
)
>!
!
"()
!
7<=2
+
)
!
!?
+
)7<=2
+
'@
)+)".AAA
/0/,
.
!2
B
'
A1
000
'
+
)) '!7<=245(&678A:" C
+
/0A
000"=
+
.
!2
*
!
B
)
'
+
+
7<=2
!
+
++'
"2 !
'!
@
=D0
.
8
)
)
B
*
)
>
)
+
+ 7<=2
)
000!
"E
;
+
+.
!2
*
'
)
'!
+
+'!
)
!
)
" 2
6"C"
+
+
!
+
)
?
)
)' /+
)
'
/
45(&6780:"2!
+
+
)
>
>
>
)+
++
45(&678:" ;
+
+
'
)
'!
+
)
)
)
D"2
! '!F
2+
;)
+
'
+
'
+*
G00
000
H
I
JHJIKHKILHLIMHMI
NOPQORSOTOUSOVWXONOP YTOPZ[\Z] R]PQTO R]\QO N]P]VO NOP^OQW]N]SOP] ^OT[P _O`O abcdefghifejklmnopqlrfsfcblptuvldwbpcxffywzuulqt{blptpy |ferb{wowwdfy}j~ldp{jgggn
P[Q\WTV[QQWX WTV[Q\\\WXOPXT]WZQWX H
KHMHHHJHHJKHJMH
NYOUTWO
¡¢£¤¥¦¤£§¤ ¨©ª«¬®¯ª¬¨ª°©®«±©²®³©´®´´ _VµWT]¶WTV[Q\·Q¸]\OPX\
!
! ! !
!
!! !
"
!
#
$
% & # # '
'
'# ' (
)
*(*)+(+),(,)-(-))(
./)(.*0(((.*0+)(.*0)((.*0/)(.+0(((.+0+)(.+0)((.+0/)( 1234567268 9:;<=>?@AB=CDE
DF=G=CCH=CCIJ BAB=AHK!=K9AH=HBLM?>NO
PQRSTUVWXYZQ[\][\^[_U`QR\]abcdefgh[iiQjSU\]kliimQ_UkniRk_Ri][opl_[iqabcdelrUSlsUft u\liqk[kVvlquSUl`QR\T[iwTQ\Q_[Tx\k][]R]U yzz{|}2z2~~2*(|25zz72~43268~
¡¢
£¤¥¦§
¨©©ª
« ¬ ¬ ¢ ¢¡ ¢§
¢©
©©
¤
¢§
¢§
®
¯®°®±®²®³®´®µ®¶®·®¯®®
¸¶®®¸¯¹¯®®¸¯¹²®®¸¯¹µ®®¸°¹®®®¸°¹±®®¸°¹´®®¸°¹·®®¸±¹°®®¸±¹³®®¸±¹¶®® º»¼½¾¿À»¿Á ÂÂÃÄÅƧĬ¬ÄªÇÈÂÉ« ÊËÌÍÎÏÐÑÒÓÔÕÖÑÎ×ÖÒØÙØÓ ÚÙÕÛÏÒÜÝÞßàÙÎÌÑÎÌáÎÔÒØÙÕÌÑâãäåæçèéÎÖÖÙêëÒÍÎÐÌìÒÌÑÓíîÖÖÝÙÔÒÓàÖÕÓëÕÖÑÎïðÐÔÎÖñâãäåæçí îÌÐÖñÓÎÓÜòÐñîÛÒÐØÙÕÌÏÎÖóÏÙÌÙÔÎÏËÌÓÑÎÑÕÑÒ ôõõö÷ø»õ»ùùú»¯®÷»¾õõÀ»ù½¼»¿Áù
!"#
#!"
$
%&'(
$
)*+,-($(
(+!(.
.
$/
$
(&
!"#$
"
$!$#0#
#!"
$
(
$$)1 2(#
(.$.
#"(
$(
$.#
#(
(
$$
#
" (
$(
!&
1
(&$ .
#$
"$
(
.#
"("(34 .
#"
.$
$
5(11 %&,,-($(
($#(
( 6
7$8
9
6"
# $
$(#"
!(
.
"#
"&" .
#(
$
#
"(
$(
.
#$$! #
(#!&,-($(
%"#
6
$(
4#$6
("-.
$5$(
" (
$$,"#
$
#($
"
/
(#
."$$$$
:" $!$#$
.);)<
$
#
#
"
"
(&;$$
$
($ :#,(
($.3#
"
$ /."&/
$
$("=$
#
" (
$(
.
#$!"#
>. ,
?
$
&%&'
."$$ $#
"#(
$"&)!""
-
"&.
$
"
/
(
$
#
."$$$$#
:/
$
$
&.&
"&#
$/$
$
($
".#
##("
"&:(3"&.
(
"$!$#&
/$
($ @ABACDEBFGFHIAGJKAHJFHLMNGFHO DPPMCBDQFEFJR 48,
.7$
"
.
$
$$$(#$!(3
+1$#$! $#&#("$($
3+S$"& $
$
$
$$$( #"
. ."&$
#.
.3#
.
# #
"
.
#!"
$
"
("
!"(
$
$+T
. #"
.$
$ # &
.(
$(
;!$#$!$#$# .
#
#
#
"$!$#$2((
$
;# $#$(
&
.$(#$
%#
6
"'(U%6'V
(("#$#
$
$!$#$8# %6'(
$
"(&.3$ (# W("#($
#(
.
"$$$(
"!"
"
;(
.
"
$$
$$$(
$ ."$ "#
($
.$ ("#
$
#(
..&#
"
.
.$#.$#!&?8XY
$!&
# $$
("
"$
$$$(
:#
#
($
$$"$
$ 4
#&8,
.$
#$
/."&
; #"
"
$
#!"
$
$## +S$1 ZNQGJDH[ADQNGADHBKAHJDELADEJL ,!$(!$##."# &$(" "".$(
!
."$$$$8, #6"
'#
#"$
."""$$ $.
"3"&
#
. #$# ."&#
(:# W("$.
.
"
&.<
T(
."$$#
#"$$
."""$$ .
"3"&
!$"(
"#""(#
$$(
.($.
""
/&#.*,!$( '!$#\"?", ($'#.$
$.$S
(
$"#
."$$'.($ $ $
."""$$#1*
($ # (
($!$(!$#$
#S46"
]
$"
'"&$T W($.$1
(
."$$6"
$$
"&.""&""#
($
.(
($!$(!$ #$
#T#$$$#.
.$("$
"&.
(
$
7$!"&
!#.
$#("#
>4,X.(!5$# ?^_'X,"#""$$$4" $
! .""#
."$$$$
.$
#!(3"
!&#
#"$
"
"&!"."""$$"
$$
$
(
."$$$ $$
."#
&$(" #(".3$;
$
.
# W("%& '"&" U<+
(V
."$$$#$$" ;
"$
("(
#
.& (
$
$!"&U-`82YV\&
$#
#"$!"
$3
$
$
.#($.
.
!"#$%&'(')! )!*
!
"+
,$
-
!"# %
*
..#..$%)#/%"$0*!" )#.' 0! #$.$12,
#21 $23,4.$"#)$"
#56
*
)#2(0789(1
!$"#:)!$#!.%"
.
!0#$";7) ".$ 8
**1#"$".<
1#2$%
!.".$#$/)
$%:)
)#2$%
) +
#
*"
!$1#"$,
1$
**1#"$".
! )$%":%!!".+
%
*
..#..=
!)! 2".
!
!$"
#)$
,"*
) $23,%
1."#:)
!2)3"
"$,= )#2$%)$%":%!)$.
%
*
..#..)*
#:
!"#$%&'('*"!!
!.2".
!
!$"
#)
"$,"#
$%! .) $,#$.,.$*.'>?1!$%!*
!=$%.$12,
1#2 %
*
..
!/!
..
"+
,$
! "@$% .)*
@
.1
!$).%
*
../%"$0*!" )#.' 4.
"$
*
!"."#:
..$%)#.@#
! #$
$% A),0!)B.
1 )$"
#=0 !" )#0*!" )#.*)+1
#)!
,CD
! #$
$%!:"
#B.%
*
..
1 )$"
# 9?EF&7GC<'A),0!)!."2#$."2#$" ,"#:).0*!" )# E#2")#=0 ).+)H)$"@=H)$"@6)/)"")#=) "I E.
)#2!=)#2*1
$";!) )!)
.
2".
!
!$"
#)$
,
"+
,$
-
!"# %
*
..#.."#$%A),0!)
*
)!2$
/%"$)#20.")#!."2#$.=)#2$%
@
2".
!
!$"
#)
"$,@)!,) !
..$%!:"
#'E#()#$) 8
)!)8
1#$,=J)$"#-%
1.%
2.*)+1
#
,KLM
$%:#!)
1 )$"
#=31$)
1#$
!NCM
$% %
*
..
1 )$"
#' OPQRSRSTRUQVSRSWQX YZ H $
#
,%)@-".$"#:.$)$)#2
)
"# #$"@.
! )
!2)3
%
1."#:
!
21 $"
# )"
2$
. )
$
*$ 2*)#2=$%,)
.
2
#$
1.
#$%%
1.%
2.)$ %":%.$!".+
3
*"#:%
*
..'G-$!*
,;
/; "#
*9GJE<%
1.%
2.)!2I#23,6&4).$%
. )!#"#:3
/CD
! #$
)!)*2")#"#
*= *)#"#:$%,.
#2)*1 %
)!:!
!$"
#
$%"! "#
*
#%
1."#:$%)#%
1.%
2.%":%!1
$% . )
)#2)!
#."2!2)$%":%.$!".+
! %
*
..#..'(@#$,;.@#
! #$
8)
"
!#")B.GJE
!" #$
#
%&'&()
$
*)+,-.
(( #
&)
,-.
/$$
#
#
#
#
#
0
1
2
$
/ $#
&3#
4
$
#
5
$
#
/&6
#
%&'&7
#
5
#
$ $$
1
-1.#
8
92 4
:-.894;&'
#
1
2#
$$$
0#
#
#
1
#
$
& <#
0#
##
-.894"
& 9
-.894
# 2
=(
$
2#
$
#>
1##
$
$1
#
&81
1?" ?"
" #$
4
$
-.8941
$,-.
:6.7%@,A;&-#
1
#
B
$1
#
&<
$$
*)&3'44+?"C D)
?" #$ :EA #;$
/
$
#
#/& 6#1
#
1
1$#
$B#
& 34
$
+$$
#
##
$
#
#
$B#
#
&)?"?"
$
')
+F#
G F
$$#
G
##
!"# !"# !"# !"# !"# !"# !"# $ !"# %&'()*+',( -.+/01234,'5./&'4-(4(16/14)+/1/734,'5./&'46483/19'(!,,.04('.&3.::'((117;/.<10("4=='&>7?')(.5;/.<10() !&4,@)')2*4@!/143.+&0',A0.&.:'0#&)('(+(1 %&'()*+',(B@#&0.:1?1C1, DEFGHIJKLMINOGPQERDSTEPUVWEQXYIZIE[EWF\SPE]^HWES_^NR`WZ^TIa^GXEWFbSc \HIdEQXefgJJRfgJhi jklmnopmqrqstuvwmxxmqrmrwqryszrymr{p|op|oywjjr o}omxowxjsqnossqnyowxj|qz~mr{lnqjp~urojwnzon njlqnp p|jpopjzympqnox~qnmpmmjyoxmsqnrmo~ ym~qmrpjyollnqo|pq|qjxj~~rj~~ mrxzymr{p|j xoqsqqnymropmqrwjpjjrp|j~popj~ymssjnjrp orpm|qjxj~~rj~~lnq{no~oymrm~pjnjywrmrj ymssjnjrp~popjo{jrmj~u ¡ ¢ ¢£ ¤ £ oxmsqnrmolnq}myj~sjjnjjn{jr~|jxpjnwjy~ njxopm}jpqp|j~mjqsmp~|q xj~~lqlzxopmqrp|oror qp|jn~popjmrp|j¥uu~onj~zxp |qjxj~~oxmsqnrmor~ onjsonqnjxmjxpqnj~qnppq~xjjlmr{qr~myjox~ mr lon~
mrpjrp~
orymron~uoxmsqnrmo~mrowmxmppq~|jxpjn mp~|qjxj~~nj~myjrp~orwjpnojypq~j}jnoxsopqn~ mrxzymr{p|jxqoxlnmqnmpmopmqrqsljnorjrp|qz~mr{ xqoxqllq~mpmqrpqlnq}mymr{jjn{jr~|jxpjn~
ory j}jrmp~pjljnopjxmopju
¦§¨©§¨ª¨«¬ª¨©©®¯°§±¬°ª²©³´¨µ ¶jpjjrory
p|jornorm~q¶onjo~ mr}jrpqnqsjjn{jr~|jxpjnwjy~yjxmrjyqrj ljnjrp|mxjmp~mr}jrpqnqsljnorjrp~zllqnpm}j |qz~mr{oryqp|jnljnorjrp|qz~mr{qlpmqr~ mrnjo~jy·ljnjrp¸¹¥º»¼½u¾|j¶onjo~ lnmqnmpmopmqrqsljnorjrp|qz~mr{m~qr~m~pjrpmp| ropmqroxpnjry~¿p|jrzwjnqsjjn{jr~|jxpjnwjy~ yjxmrjy~j}jrljnjrpropmqroxxwjpjjrory |mxjp|jrzwjnqsljnorjrp|qz~mr{qlpmqr~ mrnjo~jyljnjrp¸¹¥º»À½uÁqj}jn p|j¶o njooryqp|jnoxmsqnrmompmj~|o}jwjjrzrowxjpq ~oxjljnorjrp|qz~mr{qlpmqr~so~pjnp|orljqlxjonj wjqmr{|qjxj~~u¾|jmpqsornorm~qj~pmopj~ p|opsqnj}jn¼ljqlxjmp|jxl~jkmp|qjxj~~rj~~ orqp|jn¼ljqlxjwjqj|qjxj~~u¾|jmpqsÂq~ r{jxj~j~pmopj~p|opvnj~myjrp~wjqj|qjxj~~ sqnj}jnvljqlxjp|opjkmp|qjxj~~rj~~u
!"# $
%
&' !
()* !#++,
-
./01234567.89:;239<=>3=?@2:@AB32C9=3=?D@1E/=09=FGC3203=H:7I3J?32EKLM4MNLMLMO P" !& QRST + ! U++ !"# $
%
&
VWXYZ[\]^_]WX`abcdbe[bfWYghWXbf`idbZjXk[`ljjm[Ynlb[bfVXooWYfae[]WX`abcpqloakq[rWX`abcplbksfr[Ym[Ynlb[bf]WX`abc tbljg`a`\ulgtY[lhWXbZajvZWbWnaZdb`fafXf[ yx wx
z{{|{{{ }{{|{{{ ~{{|{{{ {{|{{{ {{|{{{
z{{z{z{zz{}z{~z{z{z{z{z{z{z{
¡¢£¤¥¥¦¤¥¤¥§ ¨©ª«¬ª®¯°±ª²³ª«´ µª«©¶ª³·¸¹´º¬ °¸¹«®ª»·¼½·¸¹´º¬¾¿ª³¸«¯À¸¹³Á¾®²¹Âª´¶²²´³¶³ª´|³ª««º³¸«ºª´|µ¹ª«³¸Ãº®¸|¶Â½À Ķ²¯´º´»Å¶¯Ä«ª¶À¸¹®º²¨®¸¸©º®¾´³º³¹³ª ¼º³´¸Æµª«©¶ª³·¸¹´º¬Çª«{ÈÉ¿ª«¶²²Ãª´ºÂª³´
!"#
$#%&' " !
" ! (!& (
% )* #
+,-./0123450670/89:;<.=,9-4<6.7,<9=>/<?,:0:@0/1ABAAAC0=,:097=DEAEAFG,75 >0/H097I589-04,9H0EA1A J%&
K&
LM&#!&
$##N&
%&!O P
K QRSTUVWXYZXRS[\]^_]`V]aRTbcRS]a[d_]UeSfV[geehVTig]V]aQSjjRTa\`VXRS[\]^klgj\flVmRS[\]^kg]fnamVThVTig]V]aXRS[\]^ o]geb[\[WpgboTVgcRS]U\eqUR]Ri\U_][a\aSaV rs
ts
ts
ts
ts
ts
ts
ts
ts
rs
rs
rs
rus
rs
rs
rs
rs
rs
v
! w*&
%&!M P
K*&
x y&
##
&
'&!
z{|}~|~~|~
||
||| {|
|~|~|
{{|
~
~|~ |||~
~
{|~
{|
|| ~~~{|||| {|||~|~~| ||
{|||~|
|{ ~||
|||{|
||
| {~||
{|||~~
{||~~~
{|}~|~
|~
|
|||{|
| |
{|~
|~|~|~||| ~
{||
{||||
|
|~
{||~
~|~
¡¢£¤¥z{|}~|~ |¦~~
{|||||
|
{||
~
{||| |~
|||§{
{|}~|~¥~||~ ~{||~{{| ||
¥ {||||
~
{|¨
|~|{|| ||{||
{~~
{|}~|~©
ª«¬®«¯¯«°±²±«³²«´µ´¶·´³¬¸°¹´®²´¶° ¡||
|~
~
|
{|¡©~~
|~|
|~|¦|
|{|
|
|||||{|||~|º~ | {|
{|
z{|
~~
| {~{||||©~~ ~{|||
|
~||
|~~|
|~
|
{|{~
{|
~~|{~{||{|
|» ||
¼||}|~{~|½
|
{| ©
¾||
{~
~¿§| {||{|
|~||
~~~ £~~|~||½ |
{|
||
{|
~§|À~~
©|
|
{|©
¾~~}|~{ |Á~|©
||
{||~ ¤Â§|{
|
¦~~
|{||||
{ |
{|{~||~
{{
~
©Á¼Ã§ »¿Á
|
{|Ä
~
| ~
|
{|
~
|©~~
{~
~
! "#$
%!
!
&
'(
)*
(++ ,&('-'
!
.!
! .("/
%'
%
!0) + 1230)4415!3
%.
!(
&(
!
6
%%*&(!
&
(
&
"-% %
!
.!
!(
%
%
%
&
%
!
" 789:;9<=>?=@AB<C9DE<F?<; $%
++ +++
'
!
!%
!
G
&
&(
"H
%
*(
!
(I%
%
&&
%
"-% '
H
' #JK13
*
LM
!N( &
!
%
&
%
%
"OKP
#JK13
(&&
I(
QR +++S"T
!
(
!
!&
(%
"U()(0 *!
(
&
!
%
%
! !
!
! !
&&%
&
I
")
!*
&
%
%!&
( (
U "'(
)" U")%&!
&(!
%
'(
)
!
!
!
&
("V+ W
X"/"Y
' '
0
L
Z!
0
[
&
& (
!
(
! &
(%
!"OV\
&+ ]
X"/"/
'
Y
'
!
"5
U
!&
(
!#JK13
%
S
!
,
&
"-%
S"2
(
L,OU^2
%
!
&
& L
&
O^'
!
!
&
%
!
S %
(
!
%
!
*.
!"5
'(
_*
.
&
(
" U%
&
!
(
%
! &
&"V
%
(&
&
!&(
&
&
!
!
(
!
"5
( %
!
II
&
!
*
*
S
" `A9F@;? 5
'
!
)(0
(
!
!(
"X"/"!%
!a(
%
&
%
G!
!(
&&
! !]
%
K
%
! 1$VbXcZ W3"Y&
(
!
!
.!
!
!!
"# $ %&
'(
$ $
")"#
"$*
"
$ '
) $ "% +,-./01/-2/.34/56789:5;/7<95-= +>?@ABCD E ' )#" " FGH"$ I)
")G%F$JKL "JKM
N
) " O P
$
"'
"
QG
"#
#"# $"%M
RJKL
KJ
) " O IIG$"' "
"%S T UH#L *G ")
""#
KK *G ") V"Q KJ *G)
"
"W' *G ")
" "
%!J E '##" ) OP
"UH#QXKG
!N
$ "YMKGZ%!K[ # I)\ #%R JKX
M!X ""UH#
O P
"OI
)KX KJJ
JJJ%FGJKS
) "
"K
NN
KS!" KJJ
JJJ)
#)#$ %! ]
G
) "
" '
'""$ ]
G
) "
" '
'""$
"
^) K!X " '""OP
JKM
LM
"\## $ G%!! _`abc`b defe ghi`hc fjklbmh dbaabinop dqcrqs dq`shk`
thchauau
thui`hc vhi_cmqaqi wkbxknybaxgqblj
wkccqbzhaki{|`eybua
}~f
sbcmqfhuc`
yjkabqazjkb yhs`abc |bcdkqmh |eoegb_sqb |qb``aq{blhxb |`evhuki bxzbgb_sqb
|jqa`qsgqizqsthxqaqiickrkuba ¡¢£¤£¡¥¦§¦¨¤©ª©£©¦«¥¬®¯©¡°± ²³´µ¶·¸¹º»¼³½¾¿½¾À½Á·Â³´¾¿ÃÄÅÆÇÈÉ´µµ·¾¿Ê·Ë´Ì¿ËͶ³ÁÉÎÏ¿ÏдÌÌ·Îѵ³ÁÆÇÒÆÓÄÅÆÅÔÕÖÖÂ̽ÁÏ¿½¶»Ï¿Ï·¾¿·µÍ Ö¾ÏÌ×˽˸ØÏ×Öµ·Ï³´¾¶½ÌÙ¶³¾³Á½¶Ú¾Ë¿½¿´¿· fhaqs{whsq|jqa`qs pbsxqs{vqii|jqa`qs _rqsbmqÛbcubsvhÜqxzqsb`usq
!
"
# "$
%$
"
$&'(%)*+,-./
01
21
01
$
3 /
401
/
5"!#"$&'(%)*+
5
6
5,-78
9
5 $$
:$&'(%)*+
;*!
!! ,-; 8
!!<!
5"
$&'(%)*+
"!
1!
,0
1 5"
<!
)6
, =
5"
"<!
1
5,
4/
0,>,
1
!
1
"?
!",-@
!
!,/
) $&'(%)*+ !
"$%$ /!
AA1
"
5
>$>
>B
+
*A"
$&'(%)*+,
!"#$%#
&'# &()$(*$#&!+,
- (-&
! .( +/+
&'#!
#*&!
01+!+$,21!+&%+/ +($& (.!(3+%
"
!,
$/4&
! (
("
&&!
&+%
$ &5
! "#$%#
21!+&%+/ +($&
# 6#+ (.!(3+%
&
! (
(&
/(3
!
%74
"#$%#
/#$7
% +#7
(.
$# +
& #$%(
!/(1! #/ +($&58
!
# +3
#7&
$/
(6 1$&
!
%
("
&&+$/+ +
&*+
&("
6(!"(6&
! "#$%#
'+$/ 1%+$,9
*:(!);+ 4'<(& ($'#$%
=+& !+/ (6;( 1"7+#'
#&/!
#
%+$
!
& #"($,&("
(/# ;# +6(!$+#(6>/+# &+$+".
"
$ +$,#"#$%#
+$
?( %
$
#
5@AB$
+&/
#.
!*
#$# 4C
D.
!+
$/
(6&
!"#$%#
21!+&%+/ +($&'+$/ 1%+$,
+!& !
$,
&'*
#)$
&&
&'#
!$# +3
&5 EF GE
!"#$%#
&#!
%
&+,$
% (
$&1!
("
&& +$%+3+%1# &#!
,1#!#$
%#//
&& (7#&+/&
!58
4 #!,
4&1//
%58
=+& !+/ (6;( 1"7+#'9
*:(!) ;+ 4'#$%<(& ($H
#!,
& /+ 4+$
I#&&#/
1&
& &
!"#$%#
21!+&%+/ +($J.!(3+%
%&
! (KL'KM' #$%KN.
!/
$ (6
+!!
&.
/ +3
("
&&.(.1 # +($& +$LL58
&
!
/+ +
&#!
#7
(.!(3+%
&
! ( $
#! 4#
("
&&!
&+%
$ &%
&.+
#3+$,
!
(6
6(1! #!,
&
("
&&.(.1 # +($&+$
O5
5'!
# +3
(
+!(3
!# &+C
HPB?OQRJ5S
+
"#$4O5
5/+ +
& #$%& #
&*+
(*!#
&(61$&
!
%
("
&&$
&& %($(
#3
&
!"#$%#
&'
&
21!+&%+/ +($&
$% (
#3
+$
D.
$&+3
(1&+$,"#!)
&#$%!
# +3
4 &"#
("
&&.(.1 # +($&5P(!
D#".
'
5T(1+&'
=
!(+ '#$%
,!
#
!=
$3
!#!
#&
!KM'A'#$% AU.
!/
$ (6
+!
("
&&!
&+%
$ &'!
&.
/ +3
45 V(*
3 !'"
%+#$!
$ &+$
5T(1+&'=
!(+ '#$%
,!
#
!=
$3
!#!
##!
21& @U'@N'#$%L.
!/
$ (6
(&
+$
<#4W!
#'#$%
+!
("
&&.(.1 # +($& #!
21& .
!/
$ 'X.
!/
$ '#$%@K.
!/
$
&+C
(6
<#4W!
#Y&
("
&&.(.1 # +($5
!"#$%#
21!+&%+/ +($&%
"($& !#
(*
3 $
+,
& -/(& 21!+&%+/ +($&*+
#!,
&
("
&&.(.1 # +($&/#$ .!(3+%
$
#!-1$+3
!&# &
!+6
4/
((&
(%(&(5 EZ[G\ GE
!"#$%#
&#!
&("
+"
&#//1&
%(6.
!3
!&
4 +$/
$ +3+C+$,
("
&&$
&&5B6
&
!-/#1&# +($
4.(
&+&*
!
!1
'($
*(1 %
D.
/ (&
!#
(6
("
&&$
&&/ (&
4"+!!(!&
!+$3
$ (!+
& #/!(&&
O5
5'#&
". 4&
!&> *+
.
(.
#)+$, #%3#$ #,
(66!
#//(""(%# +($&'#$%
3 -(66 ($/
/#.#/+ 4*#&!
#/
%#$%(..(! 1$+& +/.
(.
/
((&
+$&
#% (!
"#+$
(1&
%58
%# #%(
&$( &1..(!
+&
4.(
&+&58
3#& "#2(!+ 4(6& #
&
#3
"(!
("
&&+$%+3+%1# &
#$#3#+ #7
&
! 7
%&'#$%&
3 !# & #
&]V#*#++'S#&
+$, ($'^!
,($' #$%;# +6(!$+#+$.#! +/1 #!]
#3
6#!"(!
("
&& !
&+%
$ &
#$7
%&HPB?OQRXKJ5W"($,/+ +
&'
#$ P!#$/+&/(
#&$
#! 4
+%
$ +/# !#
(6
("
&&$
&& #&9
*:(!);+ 4#$%
=+& !+/ (6;( 1"7+#*+
7#!
4($
-
+!%(6
&
!/#.#/+ 45
!
!
"#$ % &
'
(
)
% * +,
-.$ ' #$$$
/
)00 1 (2
0
% %
, 3! 45 )
! #$$" #$$.6
% 0 70
%
0
8
9
%
7
0-:" 4 )00 (2
8
; 8 %
,0
- ' '
+
,0
9
6 0 0 )00 (2
- <
,
=9
> !
%
%
%
3! 45 )
#$$"
6 =9
>
%
! =
?
-> 3! 45 )(
%
% 0
%0 %
! %
= 0
0> ' @@
! 0
0 0
0
- '
,
% ' @@
,
! 0
0
- ABCDECF GHIJHECK HIJ LCFGHICIE BMNKOIP Q
7
%0 8
,
0
?
%
0 0
-:# <
!
9
7R
! %
0 % 0
06
0
0 0 !
6 ;6 %%
,
% 0
S 8
- Q
,
7 %
0 %
0 !,
- 4
;
% 00 0 R
7
6
8
,
0 1 + )
% T2@UVW* "X-
?
%
?
!%
, % ?0
0- '
% R%R
, !
Y
Z
[Y[Z\Y\Z]Y]Z^Y^ZZY
_`abbcdbba`efghbeffijklmienjno ma ipmbldqabr_smimsj`tf_mcm_nisubidsvi_io_i_fdfeb`slknciven_vlbom_bbjik wxyz{| }~ ||
|{y| ||{
|{ } |{ |
x|
` m [Y o ¡¡ [Y
¢£¤¥¦§¨ ©ª« ©£¤¬®¯ °®±§®²£¥³ ´£¤®²µ ª¶¢¶ ´§®¬¤¬ ·¤¥§¸¤ ¹®¸º³¬¬¨ ·¸³ ¹¥§¸ ´£¤®¦º »¦£®£¼¦ °®¬²²¤²§ ` t½¡ [Y ¾ n¿ c¡½À¡
!"#$
%&
'
'
$%$ (
(
'
)
*+
%
%%,
) -&%'
)
,
*(
.
/0
1
,%
'234&444)-'
&
'-
%
*1
$
'/
%
-
&
4!5
$%
6*1*7
' 1 8%
-9 ,
:
; < ')
<
%
' -$ -,% & / %
'%$=
*>3 0?@<1
'/
%
-
*A
?4!4
-44&
B*(*
' $%
-) -?
'- -!
C.7DBEF!GH*I
J
$%
'-
-
!4
- %
B*(*4!4K
-?
LM
M
$
-
&
-4
54
$$
% &
%
'-& -N--
-
*3#0? @<1
')<-
-*O
-
-&
'/
',
--)'3L
?
%
',
--)'
3!
*+
%
%
%
?33
&$
%
B*(* I<
$
%
-
&0?@<1
'
'
$
-
)--)'
'
%
<
$
-
%
*I
N,
-
% ,$ $%N
%
-* I
) %?
*.
& A
-
6
$1 %)
%
%
) '
'
%'
?$
-$
?%
B*(*(-&?
A
'+
-
,
-
% < '
0?@<1
'&
'
%
'
'
%
0?@<1
'
-'%
-K0? @<1
'
-%%
A
'+
C
%
1
'$(
.
HC.7DBEF4H*I-&
A
'+
$ ?-
-
J%
&'
?
%
?
$
C3M
H
0?@<1
'/
-
-*.
'&0?@<1
'
$
%
,
%
<
B*(*
-
?
$
%-
-
-
-
A
'+
C.7DBEF!GH*E
)
% &0?@</
'
%
) -
--
$$-
)
' ,
)
-& <1
$
&)'
'
* I-$$
?
0?@<
% -
)
-
& 1
$
?
% $
%
- -
-
-
%
%
&
-
%)
?? ? ? '
--
<&?
-* A
-
,$
&
%
-
-
'-
-
%
(
.
A
'+
*+ %
-
? -
&
%
-=
-%
-&
,
-
$%
,
$%
'
%*7$
A
'+
?
-
%
-
&
? -
'
%
0?@<1
'/,)'-
'
%
)
$
'
-,
)' ) -%%
-
%
<
?N% -&
%
%&
-)'
% %
?
'$
,
'
%*
!"
#
$% &
$
#
$% '!( )
* &$$! &+ ,%
! -../0#.!$$. ')&1+1 2$%3,
.$
411
56789: ;<= >?? @:9ABC:CD EF8G6C7 BCH IA:97:CJK LM:?D:9 N:9 O<P QR:9B?? S:G6H:CDG T;<;<U VW X! * Y& X!
*
Z[\]^_` abc a[\defg hfi_fj[]k l[\fjm hf^n\o_d pnn qr_]g_f^k Zs_nj_]d tfpnkded` upk t]_p l[\f^en q^[f[re^ hfdjej\j_ Y ! v!
/% &0!$!
X!
* wx!
y!."!
$.
V!
!
$ W
#.
v X!
* wx!
y!."!
$.
z{|}~ }}
} } {} {~{ }}{ ¡ ¢ £¢ ¤ ¥ ¦¤¥¤ § ¢¢ ¨¤ ©¨ ª« £¬ ¨ § ® ¯° ±¤£¤¬ ¨ ² ± £ ® ² ¬ ¨ § ¤ ³ ¨ ´ µ § ¥ ¶ « ·¶³¸¦¹º »¼¤ ½ ¾¿ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆÇ § ¢ ¥ ¶ ¬ È »É» ¤ ³¢ È ° ¨ « § § ° ¥ ¶° ¥ £ ʨ ËÌ ¢ ¬ Ê § ° ¢ ¥ ² £ £ ¨¤ £§ ¡ Í ¢ ¢ ¢ § § ¢ ¨ ¬ ¬ ¤ÌÌ ½ ÎÏÀÄ¿Ç ¨ § ¨ ¢ § ¤ ©¨ ª« £¬ § § ® ² ¬ § ¢® ± ¢ £ ¬ ¢ µ ¨ § · § ¢ È ¼¤ Ы ¨ ° ¬ ¢ ° Ñ ¢ ¨ ¤ ¨ « § § § ¤
! "
#
$%!"
%!
#
&'
"&#
%! (
)%
#**%+#& (
,&
%- ! $#*. ,&
%- ! %*#
%!" ,&
%- ! "/&
"#! /% "
!' 0!- ! "
#
#! #
1 22222 ! "
#
#! #
3334567833 1 0!- ! '
%!#&
#! #
33349:;8 1 1 1 ! '
%!#&
#! #
3334567833 1
#
,%! - !
!' 33349:;8 3 1 3 < 3 1 345678333 =>?@ABCBDE?A=FG?HIJ>KC@LKI>IMCKN>BOCOJOG PQRSTUVWXYQZZUTU[\]^\_`\ab_Uc\UT
defgfheijkl mnopoqrstusvwxywzsny{o|sxo|op}rtounr~nwo{ow sqs{opt}ot|uyzoz|zvr|ox|sr}wo}ot||no }ytxy|osvt|rozny{ooot|no|pyxr|rstywwo{ows qs{opt}ot|spr}wo}ot|rtq}ytvwr~uowypo psqpy}zmnozo~vppot|wrt~wvxomo}spyp zzrz|yt~o spooxy}rwrozunr~npowy~ox
rx|sy}rwroz ur|nootxot|nrwxpototopyw
zzrz|yt~osp otopywowroytxvwo}ot|ywv|pr|rst zzrz|yt~o psqpy}po{rsvzwtsutyzssxz|y}zsvt|roz ypoooprot~oxrtywrtq}oytzyzoxvywr~y|rstz spzs~rywpsqpy}zznsvwx|ny|oyp|syznow|op psqpy}suo{op}ytorz|rtqznow|oppsqpy}zypo yx}rtrz|opox~r|rozyp|r~vwypw|nszortwypqo~r|roz zv~nyzytpyt~rz~sywytxytxytszor|roz ypo}spowrow|sny{oy~~ozz|sorz|rtqwytxy{yrwywo |ny|~svwxovzoxspznow|opvt~|rstzzv~nyzzyo yprtqws|zspws|zspzr|rtq|o}spypz|pv~|vpoz suo{op~r|roz}yo}spozvz~o|rwo|s ts|rt}y~ypxspqytry|rstzzoortq|sws~|no ~stz|pv~|rstsns}owozzy~rwr|rozunopoyz~svt|roz~yt r}wo}ot||norppso~|zrt~r|rozur|nsv|s|yrtrtqws~yw wytxvzoyps{ywz zv~~ozzvw}ytxy|ousvwxpovrpo ~r|rozytx~svt|roz|sz~ywort|ytxo}|nonzr~ywytx zvsp|r{ozop{r~ozrtpyz|pv~|vpoto~ozzyp|s}yo znow|opzsopy|ozv~~ozzvww ig ihl znow|op}ytxy|ousvwxpovrpo~stzrxopywo yxxr|rstywvwr~pozsvp~ozunr~n~svwxozo~vpox |npsvqnzo{opyw}oytzowsuuo~stzrxopzo{opyw s|rstz ¡ ¢£¤¥£¦§¦¨©ª©§«ª£¦ª©§¬ywrsptry~svwxy||o}| |spovrpows~ywsppoqrstywqs{opt}ot|z|soyp|no ~sz|zsyznow|op}ytxy|oo|zv~nytosp|usvwx wrowpvtysvwsz|y|o~stz|r|v|rstywpovrpo}ot|z |ny||noz|y|ooyp|no~sz|zsytz|y|or}szox }ytxy|oz ¡ ¥£¦§¦¨©ª©§«ª£¦ª©§¬mnoz|y|o~svwxrtz|oyx yzzyz|y|ourxoznow|op}ytxy|oytxps{rxo tyt~rywzvsp|ps}|noqotopywvtxyzrzxsto
!" #
$ !
% &
'
(! &
%
%
)
'
'
(
&% *' %%&" ( !" %
&"
&!
'
(&
(& (*
( %"
" % (
+ ,-./-010 21345-67 86-0691: ;' < !
%" ! *
" = >% %(
% % ('
% & ?&
(
*%& %%
!
@ A) #' % B #
* ('
'
&
% %%% ! C
& @ A) #' ! (( =!
* D (
E
!"
) %%% %&
% ( % %%&" ( !" % &"
&!
'
(
(& (*
(
" (" (*
' % !
+ F/-010 21345-67 86-0691: ;' < !
% ((!
% %%% ? ! ! *
" %%G ?& ? C %
? %%% $
?E
'
!'" % (
? H I ;' J <' ((!% *' ! KD ( ! ! << L" MDN H &
'
% (('"
&
'( ?
&
!
! (('
O( ?(
'
( ' % !
((' ?" * (
?
(%" ((' ?"
% *' %$ P (('
% %
H
?"
' % P &
(" &! %
*>
(
((
% (
*
(% *'
&!
<
?
((% *' (*
'"
%
% = ((!
*' &&& G% ;' < !
+ Q9691 R5-0 ./-04-3: #
!
% ( &
*
& *% ('
;% (!%
&
(
=)
' %
*
' ! (% S D '" %(%& T *% !" *% % &
'
% *'
(
(> %
%$ * !
*
(
*%&"
> %!
% ((! & (>
;%
?(! % (
'
*
<%%
'" &
G*>
*
!
% = ( *
(
%
UVWXYZ[W\]X W^ [ _`XVWXY a[Zb[WX c d[e UYX[ f^gh\Zi j\Z[ZkX UgW`^Y\We l ) %
' " #
! m% %m((! ?
(P %& (
n ;' <
)G% ((!& %&
& %
"
%
%
H MDS" ;' < % ! o *
&
C*
E
n %& ! (!%% &" (
%*
&" %
% (! !
p Q6- F26-q4rq5: oD
CMDSEs oDD
CMDtEs oNDD
CMDuE p Q6- v6915 w5/-9x: otS
CMDNE p y768106 w5/-9x: oStD
CMDNEs p Q6-96 w7626 w5/-9x: ouSD
CMDNE
p z6{76-0: oDD
CMDNE p |812x}4771: oSD
CMDtE p ~66 w5/-9x 6-0 Q171q9 w4941r: oS
CMDtE p 12{171x: oS
CMDtE p Q5-586 w5/-9x: oMS
' CMDMDE
p Q6- 5r1: oKD
' CMDMDE
! *
((& ;' < % % (!&
&
" ' ! * P
(*
(" ;' < & I <'
!"
#$$
%
""&
#
#
"#'"#!
$
!"
#( $
()(*+,-.'"
"
"
#
*"#!
$/
!"
#0
'"#!#
$#""
#
"
#1 2#,+-&3
/#
3/"#4
"!#
$!"$
"
# (*5##"
($* (6/"
7 "'& +89:&
'! "
";
# "; (
#$
$#
!"
#$*$
$
#
7$"%
#"<!"$
'1=
"#
$*!
/#
(*
"
"
#
%*3
/# #
3#
>
;
$"
#?#;
"
#7
""
#>?7& "
"!#
/#
@? ABC;
'#
"
#
%
";$ #
&;/D"
"#! %%
($
'"#!&#
;
'#%%
($
'"#!1"E'";;
"
;
%'$
% %'#
"#!#
F##
$&"#$'
"#!
("$"
*
;$
#
($$
#
D '
$"($
%'#
"#!
%
%%
($
'"#!#
;
!
'
$#"#
*1?
'#
%
/"
"
#"##
!"
#&
#;
"
# 9,;#
%/#'!#
'$
"# "#
'#
"
%
"!"# "$
;
"
#, ;#
'$
!
"#
!"
#$;
$1G "$0 #($"#!$!"$
"
#;
/"
%"
'#
%HD"("$"
*& "
;"%*
%$"!"($'%
/#' "
($$
#
"#" ' D;#
"
'%
@? A0&BI
$
J;#
%
#%%
($
'"#!;
'
"
#&
$
+J;#
%
%%
($
'"#!;/
"
#&#
$
J;#
%
##
;
"
#&"#$'
"#!#
$"
#12
$
$$
%
$
$!
/# #
"##
"/;
! +,;#
%
!"
#0$$
"
#&
#($$
%
"
"
#$ '&"#$'
"#!"#%
'
'&
#K;* #
"
# ;
! &#
$ $
1 LMNOPQMRSTUVWXYSPOZZ [\]^]^_`abcdeafghij\klgdcmm_angamjojg\gl\g\pqdgrogdka\jsaojg\i_emenoetglrnjami_a\tqdjuaoe ienogdqado\edi_veka\wgdxj\kwjoyc`cza\t{|}oge~qmgdea\atuamgdeqdgqedoboa~wygie deue\heiwghmtihqqgdoa^vjmmjg\ke\edamgvmjkaojg\vg\tyjmeoyeieqma\iwedetemabettheog oye} [qa\tejn_oyjiqdgqgiamteg\iodaoeiwyaoalhohde`cfclh\tj\keaihdenghmtmggx mjxelgdoyedekjg\\teda^vjmmjg\vg\t_vjmmjg\wghmtveatj\jioedetvboyedekjg\ingh\ojei a\tagdnjojei_wyjme]vjmmjg\wghmtveatj\jioedetdekjg\ammbvb`cfchqog]^^jmmjg\nghmt veauajmavmeoge~qa\toyedekjg\ij\ue\ogdbgleedke\nbiyemoedia\taomeaiovjmmjg\wghmtve auajmavmeoge~qa\toyedekjg\ij\ue\ogdbgle~odeembpmgwpj\nge_uedbpmgwpj\nge_a\tmgwpj\nge yghij\kcqgdojg\gldeaj\j\klh\tiwghmtvehietlgdqdeieduj\kallgdtavmeyghij\kh\joia\t e~qa\tj\koe\a\oqdgoenojg\qdgkdai`bdajij\k\ewdekjg\amlh\tj\klgdnaqjoame~qa\ijg\_oye`ab cdeawghmtamigqmanejoiemlaoangqeojojueatua\oakeogmeuedakeattjojg\amioaoea\tletedamlh\tj\k lgdgqedaojg\ame~qe\iei
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`abcd Vef`babgbXc[cZh^i[\ _Xg^]jkXg^]lXm^YabXc nX`\]^Vno pbcd]^Vno qbcr_Xs^tb]][d^uv^Y\^Zw pi^]g^Yx^Z l[\bclXss`cbgruv^Y\^Zw Ryz{|}~{~{|{{
z{~}~}|
{|z{{~|
{}~|
{{~{~}
yz{|}~{{{~}|}
~{||~}}~}~z{}{z}}~{~{ Q}|{}~|~{||{~}|~{| ¡¢£¤¥¥¦§¨©¡ª¡«¬ ¢«¡¢£®¡¯ª¨°±¢«²¤°³´¡¡«¡¦¢µ¶¨©¡ª¡«¨«¡¦¢¦¥´¢´©¡§¡·§¨¥¥¦§¨©ª¶¦´¡¢£¡¢«¶¸¨¬¤¨ ¹{º»¼}|{| º½¾~z|}{~{}~¿À½¹~z| }}|}¿Á½À~z|
~|
~Â{||}~{~
{{|{{}|{}{|{~|ÃÄÅƽÀÇ}~{{{|È{ }|}~{| {~~{}~ ÁÉz{~
~{|{~|}~~}z~Ê{}~{}}{ ~{|{~{|}~{~|{z~}zzz{ ~
ËÌÍÎÏÐÑÑÒÓÎÔÔÕÏÖÌ×ÐØÕÎÙÌÚÍÛÕÙÖÜÚÝÓÞÜßÜàÌßÌÖáâÏÐÜãÝÕäÚ
ULQ UQNQ UTOJ UKNK
URMROO
Vm^Y[d^ eXagjafåWgå æYXç^egqbs^MK
sXcgiaK
KTJ
J
TP
_X`abcdqrv^ èÜÏÖÌÜß ÛÕééÎÚÜß ËÎßß ÛÕééÎÚÜß n^m^]Xvs^cglXag\ræYXZ`egqrv^R URSN P èÜÏÖÌÜß ÛÕééÎÚÜß ËÎßß èÏÌ×ÜÖÐ
ËÎßß èÏÌ×ÜÖÐ
ËÎßß èÏÌ×ÜÖÐ ULKPT RPêQLJ èÜÏÖÌÜß ÛÕééÎÚÜßë
èÜÏÖÌÜß Q ÛÕééÎÚÜß
!
!"#$
%&'
(&%&%()
"*#
+ ,&
#
(&&
%(
-#
!#&. (
$"/.0(
% &%
(%(
(#
($"(
(0% #
!#
(% 1# !%!0##%(&%
(%(&%&%(#&0
&%$1 &11#&%$ ("-
2+$+/%%3!%$#$
(
(#/
1-
#4&%$/ !0%&("!
.&%
/(&%"
5/67&.
-#
%%( 0
&%$7&(
%
%
-# %(&%
((
(&+*
8#!%
1# #"%9&%(#& 0
&%$-(&%/(#$&%-# & (9%9-#
%%( 0
&%$7&(
2+$+/(#0$-# 0!(&%/
!:0&
&(&%# 67&.
#%(
0. & &
5
% 10#
-# %(&% &%(# %(&%
2;<=>?@AA5 BCDEFDGHIJKLFHMDDNDNOPPQRSS 8>T U%
(#
%"1
!&
&("9
-#&
#" -0#-
&
(-# &
(-#
#"
(#1#--
7-#&%!&%$
%
&%$%#
/#1#
-!&U! --0
(&%
/
% 9&!
%(#:0&#!!0-
%(
(
&$%
#!!0-
%!"
$#%(
+V
(&%
"/
(#
#
0- &%((#!
($#&
/&%!
0 &%$ @#$%!"W
(#/,#
%
&(&%
80
&%$/
% W
1 8
%
2V
&$
(&%X%(#
5+W
(#&%()
"*#
!
&%
9&
#&("1
%
# &!
+;# (&
%
"
&
9!
(
!
X
.&%X0%&(&
1# (&#!%"/
0!!
10 &-
%(
(&%&%Y
4 % /
%
.&
&("(-# & $#
(#-#&
!"(
%(#
&(&%
!%$#$
(
(#
+;#0#!
(
%
"
&
/90
( -#0%&(!
-&(
!
(
%
%%0
-#
(&%
!
(
1 Y
4 % X
.&%X0%&(&
+ Z[\LKZ]^^_KLFLDHO`abQcdaeDG_KLF X
.&%!0%&(&
#!
0 (#
1(-#
#"
(#
(
(-# & &%
0 (
$&%$/
/-#(
.
#
(#1
!&
&(&
/%3
&(
!0#&("/
% (
!0#&(" 1
0.
!!0-
%!"0%&(9&(
!4&%$ #+@
! !
.&%!0%&("&%!
0
#0% Af!
.&%
/
!
!!
(&%$(9--
9&(.
/.
%4(
/
(#
$.7
/
% (#.
&!
%&(&
+,!
.&% !0%&("
&%!
0
67&.
10%
(
(!
% .0
(-
"1#1
&
"#0%&U!
(&%/(#
%
-#(
(&%/ 3&%!
(
/
% %9!
(&%$1#g.&%(# &9
+*
9.
##&#(%(#"
9
--
(
& 9&( -(
/-
#(%#
/
% -#
%
-
&%
+,
&(
&%!
0 !
9#4#
% (#
# &!
(
(
- #
& %(
U% g.
% &%(-#
%%(0
&%$+ ;&#
(-&%# &%Y
4 % 0% #h
"#i&.."W!
1
9&((
0--#(1-#&
( %#
/.0
&%
/
% %%-#U(#$
%&'
(&%
/!
.&%!0%&(&
!
%%9
.10% &%W
!#
%(/W
%T&$/
% ?& #
& + ?
(& ((#
(#-(&%
/!
.&%!0%&(&
#&%7-%
& /:0&!4(.0&
/
%
!!
&.
(
9& --0
(&%1
&% & & 0
+X
(
(&
(
0
-0.
&!j %
(
% + kDG^[KDKFl]_HLKmIJKLFHMDDNDNOnRQbPc o#
%%(0
&%$&
U% ."8>T
!0%&("3 .
0
&%$9&(0(
&$%
(
%$(1
(
" &%9&!1##
"
&% & & 0
% 1
&
&
&
&% -% %(
"
-
&.
+o#
%%(0
&%$ -#$#
#:0&#((%
%(
2#
0.
5
0%&(1#
%&%&(&
(#1
(
(%"
#(
(&
#%9
.
% &
(#&%
.
%
"1#!
0 +, 1 #
$ #%%(10%
/(#0$
!
X%(&%00
1X
#/(9("-
1-#
%%(0
&%$p-#
%%(
0--#(& 0
&%$1#-#
%
9&( &
.&
&(&
% #
-& #30
&%$/9&!-# &
0
&%$
#!
% #
!
(&%
# &!
% &03(##%(
&
(
%! (
-#
%
% 1
&
&
29&(#9&(0(
&
.&
&("5
#
-&
"
-
&.
&%(-#
%%( 0
&%$+V(p(%0.#1
(&
( 0%&(
% &
#(
% 0.
(
(&
(
(#.
% (
!!0%(1#
#
& %(
!0##%(
"
(# + ;#0#!
(
%
"
&
/90
(
0# "
1)
" *#
#
& %(
(
(&
(f-#!%(
# !
% &
(
1#-#
%%(
0--#(& 0
&%$2;<=>?@ AA5+q
0(
%9-#
%%(
0--#(& 0
&%$0%&(
9&
.-# & 0
&%$/1#
&-
&!&("r
4/:0
0%(
1(# &11#%(-#g!(("-
p %9 0
#!%
(#0!(&%/(
j(
!% #
&%
/
%
!:0&
&(&%
% #
.-#g!(
+;#
%%0
!
(
/ 90
(
%%0
#
$1-#
%%(
0--#(& 0
&%$&%(X&("1W
%;#
%!&
!/#st/uv+v;# (#
&%&%$f-#!%(/9
0(
#
& %(
!
%#
&%0
0
&%$su/fff&%
%%0
67&.
0
&%$ 0!#
(
0. & &'#%(
7-%
+>
&%$*
8-#g!(&%
/910#(#
(&
((
(%3(&# 1 (&
--0
(&%9&
#:0&#
0--#(
# &!
((
&%$
%
&(&%
su/fff
%%0
"(#
&%0
+
!"#$%&'() *
+,-./0,12345/607894:5;-2:28,044/581<:./0,123 1,,1;1=-58/->>/56-?=:./0,1239:@7:488:2-28,-5: 45/<16:6A18.A5-4-5/026,:5<17:,BC0:8/8.:=-53:5 ,-;4=:,1D:-<-1=-?=:9A:0,:-780-=7/,86-8->/5 ?01=6123->>/56-?=:./0,12345/E:78,5:7:1<1238-@75:618 F2-27:128.:G-H+5:-12IJKL8/:,81;-8:8.:7/,8/> ?01=6123-2:A0218/>4:5;-2:28,044/581<:./0,123B M:7:28:@-;4=:,/>;/60=-5./0,1237/2,850781/2 NA.:5:?H./0,1237/;4/2:28,-5:;-20>-7805:6 />>,18:-26-,,:;?=:6/2O=/7-81/2P.-<:?::2,./A2 8/5:607:8.:,:7/,8,-2-<:5-3:J4:57:287/;4-5:6 8/85-6181/2-=7/2,850781/2;:8./6,BQ,123;/60=-5 7/2,850781/2;:8./6,9A::,81;-8:8.:4:502187/,8/> ->>/56-?=:./0,1237/0=6?:5:607:68/RSJK9LLJB
TU
VW
!"XYZ&(((*
[25:,4/2,:8/8.:\]^[COKL4-26:;179_/<:52/5 `:A,/;02<:1=:6a5/E:78b/;:c:Hd-,8-8:9 >:6:5-=9-264.1=-28.5/4174-582:5,.148/4:5;-2:28=H -7e015:-267/2<:58./8:=,-26;/8:=,128/./0,123 >/5./;:=:,,5:,16:28,Bf18.12LJ6-H,/>18,=-027.9 b/;:c:H,077:,,>0==H-7e015:69JJJ5//;,7-4-?=: />,:5<123/<:5L9JJJ\-=1>/521-2,128.:,123=:=-53:,8 :@4-2,1/2/>./;:=:,,./0,12312,8-8:.1,8/5HBb/8:=, -26;/8:=,.-<:-=/23.1,8/5H/>?:1237/2<:58:6 128/./0,123>/54:/4=::@4:51:27123./;:=:,,2:,,B a5:O\]^[COKL7/2<:5,1/245/E:78,8H417-==H12</=<:6 61,85:,,:645/4:581:,122::6/>:@8:2,1<:5:2/<-81/29 ?08b/;:c:H45/E:78,.-<:5:607:67/,8,?H-7e015123 2:A:59?:88:5>02781/212345/4:581:,8.-85:e015: 5:=-81<:=H=188=:5:.-?1=18-81/2B[81,027=:-5A.:8.:5/5 2/88.:,8-8:A1==?:-?=:8/7/28120:-7e015123-26 7/2<:58123./8:=,-88.:,:=/A7/,8,Bb/A:<:5931<:28.: =-53:20;?:5/>,077:,,>0=7/2<:5,1/2,5:7:28=H75:-8:6 026:5a5/E:78b/;:c:H9A:0,:8.:-<:5-3:7/,8/>G-H +5:-b/;:c:H45/E:78,-22/027:6-,/>`/<:;?:59 IJIJ8/:,81;-8:8.:7/,8,/>7/2<:5,1/245/E:78,3/123 >/5A-56B gh i
j!"k)%&((( +7e01,181/2-265:.-?1=18-81/25:>:5,8/8.:5:,8/5-81/2 />:@1,8123,8507805:,90,0-==H>/5:@85:;:=HO=/A-26 <:5HO=/AO127/;:./0,:./=6,8.-8-5::18.:5./;:=:,,/5 ./0,12312,:705:BM:.-?1=18-81/245/E:78,.:=445:,:5<: 2:13.?/5.//6>:-805:,-265:0,::@1,8123,8507805:, A.17.7-25:607:4/=1817-=/?,8-7=:,-267/;;0218H 5:,1,8-27:Bb/A:<:595:85/F88123/=6,8507805:,8/7055:28 5:30=-81/2,;-c:-7e01,181/2-265:.-?:@4:2,1<:9A.1=: \-=1>/521-l,=1;18:6./0,123,8/7c=1;18,8.:-?1=18H/>8.1, ;:8./68/,7-=:BSm n
W
n o p"Z&(((*
W
a5:<:281/245/35-;,8H417-==H12</=<:=/AO?-551:57-,. -26q/55:28-,,1,8-27::e01<-=:288/-?/08RS9JJJ4:5 ./;:=:,,./0,:./=68/,8-?1=1D:./0,:./=6,-851,c/> =/,1238.:15./0,123BC:,812-81/2rb/;:9-./;:=:,, ,:5<17:,45/<16:512s-28-\=-5-\/028H9:,81;-8:,Lt 4:57:28/>>-;1=1:,5:7:1<123,07.-,,1,8-27:5:;-12 ./0,:6A.1=:5:7:1<123,044/589-26LS4:57:28/> >-;1=1:,A./5:7:1<:6-,,1,8-27:5:;-12./0,:6/2: H:-5->8:5=:-<1238.:45/35-;BSuf::,81;-8:8.:G-H +5:-2::6,LJ9tm-66181/2-=45:<:281/2,:5<17:,B vj
n
g w.:-?/<:./0,123-26,.:=8:545/6078,-5:;:-288/ ,:5<:-,?//c:26,>/5-5:-,/2-?=:7/,8:,81;-8:8/ ,/=<:./;:=:,,2:,,128.:G-H+5:-Bb/A:<:59/8.:5 =/AO7/,8./0,123-26,.:=8:545/6078,7-29-2612;-2H 7-,:,-5:9?:1230,:68/6-H8/45/<16:<-51/0,,:5<17:, -26128:5<:281/2,-75/,,8.:G-H+5:-B x o
y
p"Y$&$)#*
w12H./;:<1==-3:,-5:7=0,8:5,/>,;-==./;:,4-15:6 A18.7/;;02-=,:5<17:,8.-8,:5<:-,85-2,181/2-= ./0,123>/5./;:=:,,1261<160-=,BQ2=1c:7-?12 7/;;0218H0218,9A.17.-5:8:;4/5-5H9812H./;:<1==-3: 0218,-5:4:5;-2:28./0,123,8507805:,3:2:5-==H=:,, 8.-2KJJ,e0-5:>::8Bw.:812H./;:<1==-3:;/6:= 8H417-==H45/<16:,5:,16:28,A18.-?:69,8/5-3:,4-7:9 :=:78517-=/08=:8,9-26-=/7c1236//5>/5,:70518H -26451<-7HB[2z:?50-5HIJKL9s-2{/,:|-H/5s-; }177-56//4:2:68.:5:31/2l,F5,8812H./;:<1==-3:8/ SJ1261<160-=,Ba:5;188:6/240?=17\-=85-2,=-269:-7. 02181,-445/@1;-8:=HuJ,e0-5:>::8A18.-?:69,8/5-3: ,4-7:9.:-8123-267//=123,H,8:;9-26-=/7c-?=: 6//5Bw/:27/05-3:5:,16:28,8/F26:;4=/H;:28-26 :<:280-==H;/5:4:5;-2:28./0,12398.:H-5:5:e015:6
! "#$ % %"!& ' ()
%#$
*" &+
,# $ - ..%/&"$.#$ % .
01# .%/&"$.' "%"! . .2
! " 3
.%/ &"$.'!%"4
! "0567$ ,& "%% . 3%+2+ ".% %"!+*,%"42$ &.'.$8 .'+*", #!%+%% .'9%!$ ".! '",!&&" 8%$ !&* .'%" " !! ..'",:22 ,.0;$ 3%++4 %.+. ! ,2 )5<. !* %
0 =>>?@@ABCDE?FFGHIJHGK@LMNNNOPPPQ?B RHGK 1!! .. ,8 ++%"4*"%.S1TU.V $*.%"4 ,*!. ,, ,, 3 + , ! +.' %!++
.",,%%"+ 2!9
,*"% $ *4$$ !"3 .%"# /%.%"4""W .%, "%+. *!* .+%9 4 4 .0U"+%9 X2%". ;%" Y& .'1TU. 2*%+$ .& .", ,..$ &" "$*.%"4 .",$3 $ % 8"9%!$ ".' 2$ &.'",+%3%"4 .0Z [$%+ 1TU.
%!++
& 9 ,8" .#.%"4+ ",&*+%W#&%+
$*.%"4 *"%.'$
!*+,+.2 *. , 3%, / & +
W +8W%"!& $*.%"4" %3 ! +' &" " .* %3 $*.%"4"*2+%! ! +&*!$+%9 ;%"
Y& \%++4 0;$ ]
1 X*"!%+7* 3
,
1TU &"*#!* .",, .%4"!".*+"... ..$ .!+2%+% #.%"4+ 1TU.S
Z
.^* # _
.^* # V",,*2+ 1TU.S_
.^* # `
.^* # V0 abcdefghbc 1]
1 .$ + &", !*+,.$ + $ 3. &: %
#$ 4%"i.$& + ..*+%"# /%& +
()5Z&%++%"%"" W%& !%+ / ",%* .",(5` &%++%"%"""*+. ",%"4" . 3%! .",&"4 & "0;$%..$ + " 8 98*+, 4 ,*++ /",'",%.!..4 ,*++
%. '*"+ .. $ ]
1 9,,%%"+& .* . 3 " $& + .." ..", /", /%.%" &" " $*.%"401!! ,%"4$ j)j5&, +, 3 + ,2
1++Y& ' %4$W.%k%"4$ ]
1 i..$ + '$*.%"4' ", 3 "%". 3%! .8*+,!. /%& + (602%++%"%"" W%& !%+ / ",%* .",()0Z 2%++%"%"""*+. ",%"4". 3%! .",&"4 & " SlmnUop)V0 qrstuvwxyszw{ |}ut~qrst|st |}ut~qrstrry }t|st
}trry
zrusts}rwtwzuyruwtwzw{}wwuu}yuw}{u ¡}wwuu¢zw£wrts}r¤rw¥tzrusts}ruwtwzu ¦§¨©ª«¬© ® ® ¢wzrwrt¡}yusr¯°}wwuu}yuw}{u ¢wzrwrt¡}yusr¯}yts}ru±²³ ´µ¶·¸§¹º» ¼¸º¶¸½§¹º» ¬©¾¿À«¹º» Átwz¢wzrwrt¡}yusr¯±²³ ¸ø¼¨Ä©«§¹Å Ƨ«¸««¸·ÇŠȧ¸¸º«¸««¸· ȧÆƧ½§½©» ® ® Á
ÉÊËÌ°±ÍÌÎÎÎÌÏФ ʰ̱°¤ÌΰË̲²²
Ñs¯yzw°ÎÒ|}ut}Ó}£sr¯¡}wwuurwuusrtwÔÕzwqr{wzÒ°Ò¤Ö}{w ×ØÙÚÛÜØÝÞÞßÜÛàáâãàÛÞÙàâãäåÝÞØÛàáÝäæÙçèÙÜé ×êÝÞâèâããëåâìâÜàÛÝÜâãàÛÞÙàâãäåÝÞíèèêÝÞâ ×îÝéßèÙåâãàÛÞÙàâãåâïåâãâÜàãåâðÛÝÜÙèÙìâåÙðâñíããßÞâãòóôõÝãàãÙìÛÜðäåÝÞõßååâÜàïâåößÜÛàõÝãàãÝä ãßÚãÛéÛ÷âéøÝßãÛÜðñ ×êÝàâèöîÝàâèØÝÜìâåãÛÝÜâãàÛÞÙàâãäåÝÞùÙáíåâÙëåÝúâõàêÝÞâçâáïåÝúâõàã ×íõûßÛãÛàÛÝÜâøÙÚâãàÛÞÙàâãäåÝÞÜàâåïåÛãâØÝÞÞßÜÛàáëÙåàÜâåã
!"
#$
%
&
!'
()
$
*
+,
-).%'
/.
#
%
" #%
)! )'
# "!
&
!'
01
!
!()
1 &
!
"
!1+01
(
(.!' !"&
1$
! #&0
!' - !
22 )3
%(
)&
%
# 45)(*
+,
3)
#67( $
&
!'
2
)2)#
%1).%'#.
3 3
$
!.&
).#3
)8 2) ! #
%)!" $
2
$0 $
92 !1
)() $
#$
%
&
!'
:.
#' 1 )!# ! $
;6<6#
)!"%+#.""
# $
&
!'
1).%''
&
1 %%+
'.1
.!#$
%
' $)&
%
##!
## ! $
*
+,
6=)-
3 0.!'
#$
%
&
!'
0 $
*
+,
>##$
%
#+#
&-).%' "
'.
%%+ !1
#
!# ?
!'1)# .!%
## $
" )! ))@
'' )!
%&
#.
# )2
3 ! $)&
%
##!
## (
)&)11.
!" ! $
A
# 2%
1 0
!' )
92 !' # !3
! )
+)(2
&
!
! $).# !" )1
9 #(
)& $
#$
%
#+#
&6B$ %
C
-D)
@ +8# +%
#$
%
&
!'
%)!
-).%' &2
)3
1)!' )!#()
2
)2%
92 !1 !"$)&
%
##!
## ! $
*
+,
E+2
)3 ' !"
11 ## )
))()3
$
$
'#
!'
11 ## )#)&
#
3 1
#0 $
*
+,
$
#
!)22)
.! +0'.
) # '
A1 )(#$
%
!'$).# !"2
)'.1 #)(
%% +2
#0 ) &2
)3
.2)!
9 # !"&)'
%# !C
-D)
@ +
!'
%#
-$
6*
%)--
1)&&
!'
#.
)(
" )!
%0 #
0
!'(
'
%
1 )!# )2
3 ! $)&
%
##!
##0
!' )&)
/. 1@%+
#)%3
$)&
%
##!
##-$
)11.
#6 FGHIJKLMM NOPQRSTU VMWQXMNQYVMQZ V[XZWQNWQXQ\7!% ## $
!)!
+
0
% ()
!
>#]
):
1 =)&
@
+$
#$).#
' )3
^0___$)&
%
## !' 3 '.
%# ! $
# !"%
%
"
#
92 !# )!)($)&
%
##$).# !" !
% ()
!
$ # )
+6
% ()
!
#$).%''
' 1
%
# `4_E %% )!)( #
1)
'`a^E %% )!bD4_4c84_44E.'"
#.
2%.# )
92 !']
):
1 =)&
@
+0&
@
)!
8 &
!3
# &
! # !1
2 % ?
')2
!"
#
3 #()
$)&
%
###
3 1
#0
!' )$
%2%)1
%8")3
!&
! #
"$ 8# ?
!3
! )
#)(
&
"
!1+#$
%
#02
&
!
! $).# !"0
!'2
3 ! )! #
3 1
#
%)!" $
cd4de&)'
%6 FJHIGKLMMQXM OWYYYQLMV[X QXUVMQ[XVfUgQ XMS[Xhg[VQU ifgShgj\k
$
$
!2.
#. !"
#$
%
&
!'
0 $
*
+,
#$).%'.#
$
))%#
%
'+
#' #2)#
% )
#
# "! A1
! !
-
3 !.
!'#.22)
" )!
% 1))
' !
)! )
''
##).
$).# !"
!'$)&
%
##!
## 1
#
#
#1
%
0#.1$
# $
*
+,
k
" )!
%=).# !" b !
!1
,. $)
+l*,=b,m6*,=b,0:) ! %+")3
!
'E+ $
,##)1
)!)(*
+,
n)3
!&
! #l,*,nm
!' $
o
)2)%
!p
!#2)
)!)&& ## )!lopm0$
' E
!
92%)
!"
`c_E %% )!"
!
%)E% "
)!E)!' )2%
1 )! $
4_4_E
%%) 6B$ %
$
#
2%
!#-
'
%
+
''.
) $
qr7s8ct2
!'
& 10 $ #2
)2)#
% '
&)!#
#-$
(. .
*,=b,(.!' !"&
#.
1).%'%))@% @
()
$
" )!6;!'
`c_E %% )!E)!'0 .2 )`4__& %% )!1).%'E
3 %
E%
)
92 !' $
" )!># !3
! )
+)(
&
"
!1+#$
%
#
!'
%
# `uE %% )!-).%'E
3 %
E%
)
92 !' $
" )!># !3
! )
+)(
9 &
%+8%)-8 !1)&
03
+8%)-8 !1)&
0
!'%)-8 !1)&
$).# !"6,2)
)!)(
&
! !" (.!'#-).%'E
.#
'()
2
#
3 !"
(()
'
E%
$).# !" .! #
!'
92 !' !"
!
! 2
)
1 )!2
)"
 p$
. $)
+
%
'+
9 # #0$
#
#
E% #$
' #)-! 2)% 1
%#.22)
0
!'')
#!> !
' )E
1
' E+ $
%
" #%
.
6<$
%
&
!'
#-)
@E+()
1 !" :.
#' 1 )!# ) !3
# !#$
%
#-$
! $
+) $
- #
-).%'!) ')#)3)%.!
%+6,% $)."$ $
*,b=, #!)
&2)-
' )1
)
!()
1
#$
%
&
!'
0 1
!
11)&2% #$
# & %
")
%E+2
)3 ' !"
!
- (.!' !"#).
1 ()
$
&
!+' ((
! $).# !"
!' #$
%
+2
#!
'
' )
''
## $
E
)
'#2
1 .&)( $)&
%
##!
##
!'$).# !" !#
1. +0 !1%.' !"#$
%
#6 FvHwWMUVX L[WWMUQ[WQ[Qi jQQ= "$
#)($)&
%
##!
## #
)!"%+1)
%
- $
92 !# 3
!
%&
@
#
1 )## $
;6<60
!'
92 !# 3
!
%&
@
#
#+&2 )& )(&
@
#$)
"
#6,'' )!
%(.!' !"()
$)&
%
## #$
%
#
!'$).# !"#$).%'E
2
'- $2)% 1+ 1$
!"
# )(
1 %
3
# %+ !1
#
'$).# !"2
)'.1 )!
1 )## $
*
+,
)
'.1
2
##.
! $
!
% &
@
!'%)-
1)# #6B$ %
#
2)% 1+ #1
%% !")! $
*
+,
)E. %'eec0ca^!
-$).# !".! #)3
! " #
$
% "&'(!#
)
!* #
+
,-
.
!(((
/01$"/
&2
#2 ! 2!(
+ .)
2
!301456$7
&'2 !
)
# *
*
!
) ()
28# 9!301:;$7
& 2 ! 2#
(+9!
! )( )# 2(:;
((# 3 "1<=:$>
&2 !
)2
##!2
3!01=$-* & 2
#2 !)/
.! (# )(
() !*
*
..!*
')/
.#
!!(( , ?@ABCC@DEFGHBDIJK?@ELA@MBAFMNFOOH@OP GBNLHMEHDQFDE@RSFDEHDQPT@MG@OP # (! 2 2!2
#
(!
)(!
,>
# ! "1U$>
&'2
# 2#
2
#
)
(#
. '!"1:;: $7
&2
# 2#
((
#2
*
*V#!
)
,%2'#
!2 2
V
!
#
!*
*
! )!#.)2..*+(W
9
(!)
,-
.
!!# #
2) ((
:;(# !*
. 0 -
'! ((!*+(W
2
#
*((!X*+
Y (
!!)#
'.'! #
Z
), ?@ABCC@DEFGHBDI[K\BALPMHCHG@EPLNPHEH@P BDGT@CBPGTBLPHDQ]NLOE@D@ESBSLMFGHBDP # (! 2 2!2
#
)(!
(!
,>
# !"1U$>
&'2
# 2#
2
#
)
(#
. '!"1 :;:$7
&2
# 2#
((
#2
*
*V#!
)
,%2'#
2!2 2
V
!
#
!*
*
!)'!#.)2..*+ (W
9
(!)
,
-
.
!!# #
2) ((
:;(# !*
.0 -
'! ((! *+(W
2
#
*((! X*+
Y(
!!)#
'.' ! #
Z
),
#))!
^U_0 (
##
*(( !!#( $!#&, ?@ABCC@DEFGHBDI`K\LMMa\LDEb@AGHBD c2
#!
.!
'1" 2
/ ** ) 2
!!
.! ((,d!'e,0,
)(!((
) +
! .((...!*
!
!
:=;, >*
'
))!
+)2..!
)!#)
1" !
'2 !*. .!0#
6
# ")
#2Z
.$ !
* 2<;(#.)!
#)& #*
#
),>!'.:=)
")
#2Z
..0#
6
#' -
(((
!.!
.<)
, ?@ABCC@DEFGHBDIfKgDDBhFGHh@bGFG@FDE iBAFMjSSOBFAT@PGBiFDEkP@?@QLMFGHBD lmDnBOA@C@DGc
2!(
#! !
!
#
(!.#(
9
.(*
# (#*.!.
!
! '.2) .! ## ( !-
(!
)22 #/ ##
' '(
(# #
2,o#.)(
)
!) #)()'-
.
#
)* !
* .!)
$,
,W&#!* .#)()'* * .!)
.)(
)( !.!! .)
!
!
#)()' *.#
#)()
+
)(# #
,>
.(
,>0 ! #
!(!
# #!(
*
!
#!(!
##
$"1 U&#!(!#
!0.-!
p q/,-
!*#
!(
)2
((# !.#) (#
.
)*
.). r
,1
,
s
!"# $ !%&'()*'*+,-' !.,/*%*0/*&.. -1-(*,/2 3!--4 11..*. !+'/5 6/!/",*!%,.%& !* (&)*4! ("4.%+, *)"% 789:;<=>?<;@<ABCDEA9<8AF8G<HIJHK<L<MM?HN:LEB8HA=OPOQ=O=O RSTUVWXYZ[\S]^_`]^`a]bWcST^_dede f^ghij]jXkgifUWgcST^V]hlVS^Sb]Vm^j_]_T_W n
opqnnn pnqnnn rpqnnn snnqnnn sopqnnn spnqnnn srpqnnn tuvwxuyz {x|}u~v|{}t{~xzuyt~z}}t{ wxvzzt|{uuz {
t|}t{t{z tt
z
y{v}tw
¡¢£¤£¤¥ x¦§¨©§ª§« ¬¦§¨©§ª§« ®¯°±²³´µ¶·¸¯¹º»¼¹º¼½¹¾³¿¯°º»ÀÁÀÁ ºÃÄÅƹƴÇÃű³Ã¿¯°º²¹ÄȲ¯º¯¾¹²ÉºÆ»¹»°»³
!" #$"
%#& '()
& *+,%,& -,./,0,#& 1
!
% 2
)+,%3 1
%
+ + " #$"
%# 4 %%(,/
+ !5
2, +& 26 +,3(+/6 ," #$"
%# '(%7()& "6 8,9
& :,!6 %9
%'
"
',++,!5;
):
)6& 0
!
%& <),%9("
%#"* 4 ,. 52,+.0(,86& ,%' (9
" #$"
%# ,%;),%8 !8
" #="
%# *+,.(3,"
%# ,%,"+,),"
%# (,+(5-,8
.,&
,%;),%8 !8
0,#*)(,&
!*%9(+(!" #$"
%#& >(?@
)A" #
BCDEFGHIJKLMNOKPGNGQQRSTCLSUVGDCKWXYZYZ[ -
,+ %!6(+()(3 -
,+!6(+()
\]^_`abcdefghdcib^g^djg^c`^kkfgljbhd mgkhadnopqrg`^cs`^st`fdjgk^cuvuvwmidxcdhd_yp^eidxcdhd_z {^bx|e`en}b|{hdbjgk^a`x~ag^gf`a]^ec`ckcd
¡¢ £¡ £ ¤¥ ¦§¨©ª«¬®¯«°±«ª«²³´²µ´¶¯«°±«ª«²·¸¹«°«¶¶´«¶¶§´±¯«®¦º³»¼ª«³½¾¿¾¿ÀÁ§±¯Â«ªÃ«´± į³´¨«®§´Ã«¾¿Å¿ ÆÇ¡¡¡¢ Ç¡¡¡¢ ÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏÐÑÒÉÓÔÕÖÓÔÖ×ÓØÍÙÉÊÔÕÚÛÚÛ ÜÔÝÞßàÓàÎáÝßÜËÍÝÙÉÊÔÌÓÞâÌÉÔÉØÓÌãÔàÕÓÕÊÕÍ äå
äå
äå
æå
æå
äå
äå
äå
äå
!""!#"$%&% ' ()"*+,)! +)-)" )$% './% ,01% 2,/%*)3"4%&% ,--54% 667$% -78!)64%4% "94%$%:% #,-#4% "'&% ;*+"<)-. =>?@ABCDEFGHIJFKBIBLLMBANOPQBL>RBSGLTUOUOV WXYZX[X\ 2]^WXYZX[X\ _`abcdefghi`jklmjkmnjodp`aklqrst ukvwxyjyezvxubdvp`akcjw{c`k`ojc|kyljlald
! "#!
$"!
#
! %
!
&'()*+,-./01*+/2)3340567+89/4:8'9;<01=>?'+*@9A5);/8B;C DE "F DGG
#DE " D E#DGG
D #D E D#D =589A407+89HIJKL@K.*C
fghijkMNOPQRSTUVWOOXURYZ[XQ\PZ]^_`abcd[eTYT lmnopqrqMsnplikntghmjroujgmgvrjwmqxrxhxk yz{| z}~
}{
~
~
}}
}|
{{{
z{{}{}{{
¡¢£¤¥¢¦ §¨©ª¦¥¥©«¦£ ©¬®¯¬¬ °±²³´µ¶·¸¹º±»¼½¾»¼¾¿»ÀµÁ±²¼½ÂÃÂà ļÅÆÇȻȶÉÅÇijµÅÁ±²¼´»ÆÊ´±¼±À»´Ë¼È½»½²½µ
!
"
#
$ % " " &
&
&" & '
(
)')(*'*(+'+(,',(('
-.('-)/'''-)/*('-)/(''-)/.('-*/'''-*/*('-*/(''-*/.(' 0123456157 89:;<=>?@A<BCDCE<F<BBG<BBHI
A@A<@GJ <J8@G<GAKL>=MN
OPQRSTUVWXYPZ[\Z[]Z^T_PQ[\`abcdefgZhhPiRT[\jkhhlP^TjmhQj^Qh\Znok^Zhp`abcdkqTRkrTes t[khpjZjUukptRTk_PQ[SZhvSP[P^ZSw[j\Z\Q\T xyyz{|1y1}}~1)'{14yy61}32157}
¡¢£¤¥¢¡¦§¨©ª«¬¨®¢¯¢¨¬°±²¨ ³¬´¢¢µ³¶±±¨°·¨¬°¬µ ¸¢¡®·³«³³ ¢µ¹¦º¨ ¬·¦»¼£££ª½¾½¿À Á ÂÃÄÂÅ
ÆÇ
ÈÉ
ÊËÌ
ÍÎÏÐÑÒÓÔÕÕÖ×ØÙÚØÖÛÖÜÝÙÞÔßàÙáÖâàßÛãàÛÚÕ äåæçèéêéÓëæèäÐÒæìÎÏåÑêçíÑÎåÎîêÑïåéðêðÏðÒ ÄñòÂóôÄ õöö÷øù
õöö÷øù
!
"#"$%"$
"$
&''
&'
(
""
%) * %"+,-*
."/0$12
34456 *7"+ *$7 -
"
-"",8
- 2$"
-4(' 8)+
44
)"7'2
- $
'2
-$'2
9 :9;9<9=9>9?9@9A9B9:99
CA99C:D:99C:D=99C:D@99C;D999C;D<99C;D?99C;DB99C<D;99C<D>99C<DA99 EFGHIJKFJL
'$"MMNO"P&)"""Q2O"
7%"7O"5RSMT6
UVWXYZ[\]^_`a\Yba]cdc^ ed`fZ]ghijkdYW\YWlY_]cd`W\mnopqrstYaaduv]XY[Ww]W\^xyaahd_]^ka`^v`a\Yz{[_Ya|mnopqrx yW[a|^Y^g}[|yf][cd`WZYa~ZdWd_YZVW^\Y\`\] FF F:9FIKFHGFJL
!"# !"# !"# !"# !"# !"# !"# $ !"# %&'()*+',( -.+/01234,'5./&'4-(4(16/14)+/1/734,'5./&'46483/19'(!,,.04('.&3.::'((117;/.<10("4=='&>7?')(.5;/.<10() !&4,@)')2*4@!/143.+&0',A0.&.:'0#&)('(+(1 %&'()*+',(B@#&0.:1?1C1, DEFGHIJKLMINOGPQERDSTEPUVWEQXYIZIE[EWF\SPE]^HWES_^NR`WZ^TIa^GXEWFbSc \HIdEQXefgJJRfgJhi j
k
ljlkmjmknjnkojok
pqrsqtuqvqwuqxyzqpqr {vqr|}~| trsvq t~sq prxq pqrqsypuqr qv}r qq
¡¢£¤£¥¦ §r}s~¨yvx}ssyz ¨yvx}s~©~~ªyzqrz¨v«y|syz j
mjoj¬jjljjlmjloj
p{®q¯wvyq
°±²
³´µ¶·¸¹º»»¼½¾¿À¾¼Á¼ÂÿĺÅƿǼÈÆÅÁÉÆÁÀ» ÊËÌÍÎÏÐϹÑÌÎʶ¸ÌÒ´µË·ÐÍÓ·´Ë´ÔзÕËÏÖÐÖµÖ¸ ªx×yvبyvx}s~ÙsÚª~qrz~ ÛÜÜÝÞßàáâ
ÛÜÜÝÞßàáã
!"#$%&%'()*+,-. -)( /(0*++12
-3/&4 +) 5*-67 2*- -)8(
5 -
9:;!;<:;:;=
>?@AB@CDEFG@HI@AJ K@A?LC@CIMNOJPCB FNOAD@QMRSMNOJPCBTCU@CINAEVNOCIWTCDHOX@JLHHJILI@JI@AAPINAP@JKO@AINYPDNLCXSV ZCLHEJPJQ[LEZA@LVNOCDPH>DNCN?PDTCJIPIOI@ RCPIJN\K@A?LC@CIMNOJPCB]@A^_U@ALHHY@JPX@CIJ `
abcd` dbd`` ebad` ffb``` fgbcd` fhbd`` fibad` aab``` ajbcd` acbd`` a`f`a`ffa`faa`fga`fja`fda`fha`fca`fea`fia`a` klmnopqrf`stuqrvwwxqomyqlno z{|}~z
~
~~
}{|
~|~ qrql ¡¢qwnqro £ww¤qrvlqln¥¦§oml ¨©ª«¬®¯°±¯©ª²³´µ¶´·´¸©«¹º©ª´¸²»¶´¬¼ª½²¾¼¼¿«À¾´´¸¨ªÁÁ©«¸³·¯©ª²³´µÂþÁ³½ÃÄ©ª²³´µÂ¾´½Å¸Ä«¿«À¾´´¸¯©ª²³´µ Æ´¾¼¹²³²®Ç¾¹Æ«¾º©ª´¬³¼È¬©´©À³¬¶´²¸³¸ª¸ ËfÊ ÉifÊ
ÌÍÍÎÏÐÑÒÓ
ÌÍÍÎÏÐÑÒÔ
! "#"$ "$
%&&
%& '
"" (
)
*)"
(
"+
,-*&
./
0$
"&1
*
2"+
*$2 -
"
- 1$" -"",3
) -'&
3)+1$"
4 5
64657475848594955455:4:5;4
<=<<=><=?<=@<=A<=B<=C<=D<=E<=F>=<>=> -""$"2+"$%)""G2 #
2&
HIJKLM>ENOPMQRMLSTUMTRVLWXWYUMLZJM[ZTKZLW\V]^M_`MLZRKLMa?<>Fb cdefghijklmdnopnoqnrhsdeoptuvwxyzseffhop{h|e}p|~gdrzpe}}hfdrwxwuvwv s}nrpnglpshophf~ o}|n|ifhsdeogn}gdodrngo|pnpeph 2"$,($"-""$ !$)"$,'"-""$ #"$
"&$1'3")+"$&$"
¡¢ £¢¤¥¦ ¡ ¡ § ¥ § ¤ ¨© ¢ ª«¬®¯°±²³´¯µ¶¯®·¸¹º»¼«¸¬³»µ¶«»¸¼½®»¾«¹¯¹¿¯®°ÀÁÀÀÀ¯¼«¹¯¸¶¼ÃÄÀÄÀÅÆ«¶´ ½¯®Ç¯¸¶È´·¸¬¯³«¸Ç¯ÄÀ°À ɤ¥Ê¥ËÌ¥¢ ¥ £¢¢Í¥¤¥ ÎÏÊ ÐÑÒÓÔÕÖ×ØÙ×ÑÒÚÛÜÝÞÜßÕÜàÑÓáâÑÒÜàÚãÞÜÔäÒåÕÚæääçÕÓèæÜÕÜàÐÒééÑÓàÛßÕ×ÑÒÚÛÜÝêëæéÛåëÕìÑÒÚÛÜÝêæÜåíàìÕÓçÕÓèæÜÕÜà×ÑÒÚÛÜÝ îÜæäáÚÛÚÖïæáîÓÕæâÑÒÜÔÛäðÔÑÜÑèÛÔÞÜÚàÛàÒàÕ ñò
óò
óò
óò
óò
óò
óò
óò
óò
ñò
ñò
ñò
ñôò
ñò
ñò
ñò
ñò
ñò
õ ö©¥¤¥ ÌÏÊ©¥÷ø¥¢¢¥¦¥
ùúú
ùúú
!"#
$ %& ' %
$ %& (")*
+ '%%" ',-&
" .//01$/"%%/ (*'2,23%&4-
/%
522
6789:;<=>?@@A;:BCD;DEFG9H7D8CDIJB;:8;DKLMN;@E;:O;:P=QRS;:C@@T;H7I;DEHU<=<=V WXY" + Z'Y"
+
[\]^_`abcdb\]efghigj`gk\^lm\]gknig_o]p`eqoors`^h`g_l[t`ok`^e ugqolefeavqlu^`qm\]g_for_\g\sf_igekfk]k` Z!" w" 0&'1"%"
Y"
+xy"
z"/#" %/
W"
! " %X
$/ wY"
+xy"
z"/#" %/
{
|
}{}|~{~|{|{||{
¡¢££¤¥¦£§§¨©ª«¦©¬®¯£°§±²³´µ¨££¶§ª©°§ ·¸¹º¸»¼½¸¼º¾»¿À¸»}{Á ¾Â¸¹¸ÃÃÀ¸»}{Á ÄÅÆÇÈÉÊËÌÍËÅÆÎÏÐÑÒÐÓÉÐÔÅÇÕÖÅÆÐÔ×ÌØÄØÖÉÐÎÆÎÙÆÇÉÚÆ ÛÐÚÜÕÎÏÎÊÙÚÕÛÇÉÚÖÅÆÐÈÏÜÝÈÅÐÅÞÏÈÒÐÎÔÏÔÆÔÉ ·¸¹º¸»¼ßºÃÀ¸»}{Á¾à½¸»á¹¹ ¸Ãß⸼ºÃ
ãääåæçèéê
ãääåæçèéë
!"#$%
&'()*
+,&('(-(
)!) .$/!" %
-$#01
-$#2
3$ '(
) 4
&"#$
45 6()*#$
45 7()8%
9$:(##!*$;<$ "$ = 6/$#-$ >$ 2!"()2
99&)(-8;<$ "$ =
?@ABCDEAFDGHIABAJHAKLML@ANFDFNINCDONCPFNINQBFKAJRBL@AEFSADQBROIKLTUAOFCDQBFKAFMOADRLAOFDGHCKVT W?@AOIBCLFRDGALXAADCQBRQRMCHLRGIFHOYKRDSABLYRBFDMLCHHCIDFLCDOL@AOCLAL@CLMCFOIDFLFMRQADAO ZC[\BACRDH[T]BRN^DLABQBFMA_RNNIDFL[`CBLDABMabcdedcfghijkklcmnogpgqrsbcdfdhqghitgeupnvdwdhqxjvyzgegqglh{cd|nogpgqnqglhlkzhezoegmg}dmnkklcmnopd|lzeghighq|d~nrjcdn \MMINAMWMICBAJRRLBRRN WNRDL@MJRBMCHADAERLFCLFRD WWNRDL@MJRBHRKCHCQQBRSCHM
WNRDL@MJRBKRDMLBIKLFRDTRXABBCDEAFDKHIOAMOAQBAMMAONCBVALSCHIAMBAMIHLFDEJBRN_CDOAPQAOFLAOQBRAKLCQQBRSCHMIDOAB QADOFDEHAEFMHCLFRD @ADKRDSABLAOFDLRLBCDMFLFRDCH@RIMFDETRLAHMCDOURLAHMNC[CHMRGAKRDSABLAOFDLRQABNCDADLMIQQRBLFSA@RIMFDEYCHL@RIE@L@FMFMHAMMKRNNRDT ¡¢ £¤¢¥¢¦¥§¨¢©£ª
3$ !*$ +
'-0',«
-« ¬
$+-7(9$
9 )-/'
%
&'()*78<$ ®¢¢¥ ¡¯¯ ¢¥ ¥¥ ¡¯¯ ¢¥ 4$3$#
<9$)-2
'-"8¬
&+-78<$
®¢¢¥ ¡¯¯ ¢¥ ¥¥ ®¢
¥¥ ®¢
¥¥ ®¢ ° ®¢¢¥ ¡¯¯ ¢¥±
®¢¢¥ ¡¯¯ ¢¥
²³´´µ¶´·²¶¸¶¹µº· »¼½¾¿ÀÀ¼ÁÂÃÁ¼½ ÄÀÅÀ¼ÆÇÃÄÀ¿ÀÂÀ¿Çà ·ÀÅÀ¼È¼É¿ÄÈÅÀ¿Çà ½¼Ê¿½¼Á ËÇÀ¼½ÅÌ̽ÇÍÅÈ ½¼Ê¿½¼Á ³ÎȼÀÇÏÂÃÁ ÆÅ̼Р³ÎȼÀÇÏÂÃÁ Ç̼½ÅÀ¿ÇÃÄ ³ÎȼÀÇÏÂÃÁ ÄѼÈÀ¼½ÄÅÃÁ ÑÇÂÄ¿ÃÉ ÒÃÏÂÃÁ¼ÁÄÀÅÀ¼ ¾ÅÃÁÅÀ¼ ¸Ó ÔÔÔÔÔ ¹ÂÃÁ¼ÁÄÀÅÀ¼ ¾ÅÃÁÅÀ¼ Õ¶·Õ¶·Õ¶·Ö×ØÙÚÕ¶·Õ¶· ¸Ó ÒÃÏÂÃÁ¼Á½¼É¿ÇÃÅÈ ¾ÅÃÁÅÀ¼ Õ¶·Õ¶·Õ¶·ÖÛÜÝÚ ¸Ó ¸Ó ¸Ó ¹ÂÃÁ¼Á½¼É¿ÇÃÅÈ ¾ÅÃÁÅÀ¼ Õ¶·Õ¶·Õ¶·Ö×ØÙÚÕ¶·Õ¶· ¸Ó ·ÀÅÀ¼ÎÇÃÁ ÏÂÃÁ¿ÃÉ Õ¶·Õ¶·Õ¶·ÖÛÜÝÚ Õ¶· ¸Ó Õ¶· ·¹²³Þ¹³ Õ¶· ¸Ó Õ¶·Ö×ØÙÚÕ¶·Õ¶·Õ¶· ßàáâãäåäæçáãßèéáêëìàíåâîíëàëïåíðàäñåñìñé òóôõö÷øùó÷ö÷
÷
÷ö
!"
# !"$
! !$
!# ! $
!%&!
'( !!&!&
)!&
&
!" *+,-.*/001.-2-345567889:;6<=:95:65>;958>65>?6:7898<:6:<>6;;; @
)!AB
C(D
!&!" E03FG3.HI*+4JK44-42+.H3 L;6>?7 M986;;; M9=756=;86;;; A) @
N
O( !!&
)!&
&
!" A) @
N%
!
PQR" S3TU/V1W+FX:Y=ZL6==<98;:6LL;98;6;;;9=6?>=6?<5675;9=?=6>5;6;;; [/23WYU/23W*/.\3F4-/.X:Y=ZL6==<9:?86;;;98;6;;;9:67586<:56;;;9=?=6>5;6;;; KH]1-4-2-/.^_3J+,X:Y=ZL6==<9=<L6;;;98;6;;;9=67=568<56;;;9=?=6>5;6;;; `&A) @
N
PQR" aW3b-,W3[/14-.Gc/1HJ3F4X9:>d e3FJ/03W344J/143J/WV4f9:>d g/F+WW:Y=J/03W344J/143J/WV4 g/F41ee/F2-\343F\-H34Z 5<6;:8 M95;6;;; M9>7;65<;6;;; $`$#hijkOPlkmmmknoCiOkPOCkmOjkQQQ
pNOmq
r%
!BN@
)!&s t# 'qOqCu
!
vwxyz{w|}}~{zz}x|}wz|
xx{ v|}{z|{z}x|}|} v|~xz}x{z|{xxx~}|xz{|}~{~{z|| ~yzz|~z{ v||w|{z|{z}x|}xx||}| v~zzz|{xyz}x|}{zw|}}~{zx{ vx{{~xz}xx|}x{x{z| |}zy¡yx{¢{z~ v£zy|~z{¤|~x{x{{~xzz}xx|}|} ¥¦¦§¨©ª«¬
!"#$%&'&(
)*&+,,-./012"3
445
"!",,3",, 65
+, 3783 9" 0"
4/! 4
&3 :"7 ,! 9";3!%,/! 4
&3 <,5 7(5
+, 37 /
,,/+,",3#/
3,"=+"3
",>&
(?-@( ,ABB!
7
9B&"
&,B@BC33
"B(
+, 37D
,,B(
+, 37D
,, #4 E2+ !# 3783#+,&%;,,
3-2%;&")+3"@?( ,ABBFFFE
%#
,
3! 3"
B +$B($3
,44B@?G@@HG@).IJG@
2%G@;&"G@)
$,G@5
+, 37G@8
$!3
"K 7 L.0J39 &
3 "3!*&
"
3;7"3
%J39 &
;!,-1
0("" ( ,ABB"39 &
!," 7
9B"39 &
!,B1
0("",B #4B 0+ !"
"3!BJ
!
%
"3(
+, 37&
#4 /!
, 37/! 4
&3 <,(
+, 377 >
M 3,"%'!
$!83, +" N
$"&L-@H( ,ABBFFF
O 3,"%
B4"+&"#D 3, 7(,B +&$3 P
3B
!
, 37D
! 4
&3 ,D(
+, 37D7 Q H( ,ABBFFF3"R@
&7B, ",B#"4+!BC!",B@SD@HB
! 4
&3 D (
+, 37D7
!,D@SDL #4 ? !!
3-:
T*
,
3-2"3T2&K,-)+! U;44
&#$!"(
+, 37
3
,V
!!
3 3/! 4
&3 /
&
39 &+,
+!#
O" F
&,"W:
,;37"!",X
",A; & !S-@@( ,ABB FFF!
",
B(
"!",,D(
+, 37B,
&%B@@D@LD@SB
! 4
&3 D!
FD 3
"D(
+, 37D"R "3, 9"D &
"3D
&
39 &+, Y.3 ,&"
" 9 37R
&"# C33
37 &
9"#$%("/! 4
&3 XR /&"# ;!!
3/
"" S( ,ABB
&,&"
&,
37&",,7
9B &
#+
B #4BZ:BZ:ELS @8$ # ( ,ABBFFF
$
&7B&","&
(B(
+, 37B
(&D$
OD
+,D 3D 4"#"&!D,, ,3
"D(9"D"R
"&$"#D4
! ",D,&+77!",D
8$ # E'"
44Z
,,-" +% &"
&-/! 4
&3 " &
"3
45
+, 376 /
+3 %"9"!
"3*&","3
3
("2%;&"/
+3
! >&
(-@ L/3# 3N$,"&9
&%
35
"!",,3",,A5
"!",,5+$>"3! 5"!(@S( ,ABBFFF(
"!",,(+$
B$
+D(
"!",,3",,B
,B
"3!D("!(QA[A"R\5
"!",,3",,G/G@
3G@+&3G/G@
! C",G@
&-#" &",,
3G/G@
,!"" !",,3",,G@3#G@,+$,3
"G@+," X&&-*""&-*(5
"!",,3",,3#>"3!8!!3",,A;/(!!"37"
N+&0
"%2& 362"(9
&Z","&
(1
+3#
3S I
9"
$"&@Y( ,ABBFFF$$&4
+3#
3
&7B$!
7B (
"!",,3",,D3#D
"3!D !!3",,D
(!!"37"D
+&D,
"% H.3 "#0",0+$,3
";$+,"3#>"3!5"!(0"&9
", ;#
3 ,&
3/+&&"30 ,
,
3("*&"9!"3
"3# /(&
"& ,,
4*"
!"JR "& "3
375
"!",,3",, 3(" .3 "#0",)+!%@( ,ABBFFF, (,7
9B, ",B#"4+!B C!",B &
7&
,]
73,B(
"!",,3",,] &
7&
,]&",
+&
",B (&
D4
,(""D
+&&"3D, ,
,D &"9!"3
"D
(&
"& ,
,D (
"!",,3",, #4
?", 3
3A5
"-0*;Z/Z
"3#5
"!",,3",, 303/!& /
+3%-/! 4
&3 )3+&%@@( ,ABB#", 3
3(
",9
&7B F D
3"3B+ !
#,B@@B@BZ
!J=+ %Z"
&@E@@ #4 YI
3!:
F83
"5
+, 37/
!
35
+, 37I""#,$% 0"A/! 4
&3 ( ,ABB3! (
&7B(
+, 37D3""#,D$%D,"B
! 4
&3 QA[A"R\;
&
,,G@/! 4
&3 G/G@("&"G@ ,G@
-
4G@(" &G@ 3
"G@
3G@(
+, 37 S;!!5
"Z"7
3!5
"!",,*&"9"3
3( ,ABBFFF!!(
"
&7B&"7
3!D(
"!",,3",,D &"9"3
3DB @;+#
&
4("0"
4/! 4
&3 /! 4
&3 <,5
+, 37;7"3
",- Z"
&I+
$"&@@D@YI
9"
$"&-@@( ,ABBFFF+#
&
7
9B&"
&,B@@D@YB,+
&%(
! / %3#/
+3%
4031&3
,
" &
"3
45
"!",,3",, 3#0+
& 9"5
+, 371^@SD@@3#1^@@D@
5"& 37
32+#7"*&
& ",; & !?-@S2+#7"3#1 33
" /
"" / %
4:
,;37"!",U5
"!",,3",,3#0%,"
83"=+! %A N9"&9 "F3#*
!
%2& "4W/
+3
!
"
$"&>&OZ #!"%DX(
,- *(( ,ABB
&O& #!"%D(
,!
%
&7B(
"!",,3",,D3#D ,%,"
D 3"=+! %D3D
9"&9 "FD3#D
!
%D$& "4B E5.@S*
3D 3DX
"/
+3 L !!
3-:
3#N&",O",-2"3K
35
"!",,,("!"&
3"3, &"+, 37( ,"39 &
3 "3!!F 3$ #
$!
O3"F(
+, 37:
, ;37"!",X
",*
!
,>%-@S( ,ABBFFF!
",
B
!
,B!D
!D
D
"=D(
"!",,D,("!"&D@S@D,
&%(
! *&O-)"
37:7+35 !!,F
3<&%
$!
O
+3%4&
(
+, 37 (
"!",,F (
&
39 &+,:7+35 !!,833N&37"/
+3% Z"7 ,"&:
!I"F,A>%-@@( ,ABBFFF
&"7 ,"&
B@@B@B@B!7+3D( !!,DF
3D&%D
D$!
OD
+3%D4&
D (
+, 37D(
"!",,DF (D
&
39 &+,DD!7+3D( !!,D 33B H'"(-)
," (> ! ,F !!,+"
,
(
"!",,(
+, 37 &
K"
4+3#"#$%,"-
+3%X(">"&
+&%I"F,N
$"&-@@ ?( ,ABB
#3
S+,
+&,7
9B #,
&"
3 3,B@YB@SB@LBDEYL #4 Y031&3
,
" &
"3
4*+$!
5"!(5
"!",,>
&! % 3031&3
,
1"$S-@S( ,ABBFFF,4# (
&7B# (B (
B5/;7"3B@SB1"$&+&%G@SB5
"!",,G@>
&! %G@
DG@5"!(G@/
,,
3G@2
O7&
+3#G@Z"# 37G@
@Y@S #4 S03/!&/
+3%>"#
!JR
3"&D/
&
3"&<,N4C
" 5
"!",,"(, 303/!&/
+3%-/;;&"&
, "
9" ,+#%@D@H;+7+,-@?( ,ABBFFF,
7 9
&7B, ",B
&
3"&B
+
"3,B>J/D5
"!",,D"(DZ"&
, "
9"D
0+#%D@D@H #4
!
"
#$%&'(
)*'
!+ &"!
&
!
+' #+
) " , !&'& )"&
!#!(
)-" '
./
&0'
%!123)
455 %&')
) '
/5')&5 ! !
5("6!
&
7(-.8!O& +# 2:);<8!+#
& %!
!:)<
#;< (
)=233>12?48!+#
& =-@!&= +*&A9 '
! ";<<
B612CD23E2FG42FFFH2FI1+&42225 @ " 12C2C 1 ' +&(;
$&
&:&"
+"!
&
+
#!"
)< 9! '&'
!
"
#$%&'(
)E(" 6!
&
&< 9! '&'9%23=123GD
# $%&'(
)E
!#!(
)-" '
./
& *'
:!+&6!
&
*
+ #
)" $ ., !&'&("&
0'
%!123GD +
)<
!
6+&' ., "&!> !!J0#K'E("
)&<
!
= !
! '
&/
+
122>12?
=12IG < 9! '&'
!
"
#$%&'(
)("6!
&
&< 9! '&'9%23=123)
455LLL#+ )!5+ )5 )'5(512359%! !
M1235("M16!
&
M1
>M1(
)M1""&&M18 'A!+M1* +&M1
12C123 +# F
!#!
&
! +$!/
&! /&!
& 1234$ N&
)!
&6+&' +&
&)
455LLL'+' /5'! /&!5123>'/5+>,
! > !'
&5 >L&
)> "+&' >'+&
&)
"
&)
.
&"
+."!'
+0%!/
& 5 O !
& '&
P+#!
);<("$
& *
+
0Q-
>23., !%
D$!@'
+ ( &
&R
&=-
&/ !;&
+6!
&
;&/!&
#$
/ & =;&/!&
# &#!& =8
;&/!&
6 !')1F=11)
455LLL%+5L5K51155 0Q-
> !717221I " +# ?*
)&!=S& +P!
R=<)
0Q-
>23 +(" &PLT!A&
&
&#!
)("B11)
455 LLL' &
&#!
))"!5L >'
5 +5115?5 0Q-
23("* !
B11 +# I."&
6&
=$)
2D.!&6$ !A!=$)
2DU!&
&.P !A= 6
2DB&6S
=6
1=D:! /&$8
=6
1=F=D .&R %
)-"%!
=6
?D6 +&< A ! =6$(ID)
<' !%!)=6$(IDU !&(
!=6$(CD6
( =6
CD .
& SR =6$(CDB+
* ')=6CD&%%
$ =6$(CD :"
66'6&') =$)
C=3D*
U
&=6$(2DS! '. 6 !,=6
2D:"+!L=682DU!&
&<')"&
=6
2D< 8 "! )6!!&=6
2DP&'9
L&=$)
2DS!& $ ''A= 6
2D0Q-
>23(": " C)
455!&+
>
)" '
/5&+, ) 5/!!> +/&!> >)">!'""+>'" !)&/>'!&&>! 5 3.,'
&/0#K'#
)$!&+
#
);&
+<
#"!&' :)<
#("&"!&' '&#.'"&' +/&!=< "%!123)
455LLLL)&
)/5 L >'
5 +5123535:)><
>#>(">&> "!&' +# F! =6&') +8!+ 0J9 )!
)")
! '+&
&+
!"&)
!
&V:)' #
)
&A& +B! #;!% .'"&'./&!4P/"%!=2333 F2/&=B + &!&N' J
)
!!L
# )"< 9! '&')!&'0 &&>.+& !&
23=123)
455LLL#')!&''"5 &&5 #!"5 !
&'5 N>' >
>)
!>!>L
>
>#>)">2FF1? ) F1("L !+
$!!* !
F;&
+<
-
! '
'&("E12IG:) ./&+'8)&+ ! ') )
!&/ .+
(" *
!&/+&152F52C4)
455LLL&')/5!!'5 +5
7&%! !
5/&+'>%)&+> ! ')>
)
> +)" +D##=(=
E13GW
0<&R9&
V N)
N + J
!9!" 6
>
&#(& 6+#!$!L&
)6
-X$
')&
!&'<!/&'?EFG 4FIHFC1D*=
=
E12FGW$!"
< !
&/(&4 &
)./&+'X$
')&
!&'<!/&'?EG41CI>13F FF
!")=6 !
&
'& !/8&) &(L &
$!/&+("<!/&' +N)' S
&
<)
! N6;
'"%!=12I)
455L "!5
!
52I52155+> '>''&> !/>%&>') &>'&
> !/&+>)">!/&'> ' >
>)
!5 F +=B) +" + S+;!% -
&
:)'
+
& /&# !
&/)&#!')&+L# ! &//+# "&&6
123)
455LLL!% !5&
5+#
5 K5 %&'
&521325
)7'
7 +7
& 7 /&7#7 !
&/7)&7#!7')&+7L# !7&//+7# "&&7 +# F?&=* +W &#!& +"!)"%& S + 9 '%A !%
&
)&"+ !)&
!
X< 9! '&')!&'P/"%!1F=11)
455LLL#')!&' '"5%&5 !
&'5 &#!& >+>"!>)">%&
>S> +>2IF1CFC ) FIT=B "$!!/&##!+ %&&
=$!/
&
& '"
'Y&&
&>*) %&&
&#;%&+&R+ ##!+ %(&&
)8
! .
! !&""&
$ !
!=11 FC+&
&)"/!5)"> !/
&5
F3)
455LLL"!'!
L'"5115151I5 >@> >K!
>
&
>)">'""&
>#!>#!"!
>)"> !&+
5 )
455+#
# &!5 %&'
&7! !
5
;7 ( +%A +#
!
"###
$
!%
&'()""" ***+,-
-+
./,!0,-
!1+
.
!
" #
$$%&&&'##'&
$ ""$
"%"""
""
" "#"
"(
)*+,-./ 0123*45 6789:;<=7:>?@AB7CAA7DE? 67FG>GCCEGCCHEBI>HJ7KEHIJ7KL77?M N/12+OP/*QQ*14RST,S.TU.VV1TW*45+1.4SXY123*454SSW3 .33S33ZS4+[1TQS33+Y.4\]1^+YS3+.+S/2W5S+_ 01ZSQS334S33*4-13N45SQS3Y.3TS.VYSW`SZST5S4V,aQSbSQ3U.VV1TW*45+1*4V1Z*45c.,1Td.TS4 e.33_fghihjklmgnkopknqnkrstuvkhwxyzpf{rl|nii}~ljn ¡¢
£¤
¤
¥
¦ §£¥¨¡©£
¥
ª«
¬¤
¥
«
£
©£ª
¬¬£¤¤
£¥¡¬
£
¥ª
£¨£¬
®
!
" #
$$%&&&'##'&
$ ""$
"%"""
""
" "#"
"(
)*+,-,./0.11-23456,-,*+7./48-254.9-:+/+;;9-<;456=++3;>;;+;;:+5,02+/+.;+3-5)<+;3.?@ 7./48-254.:<;,45A+;,BCDEF4//4-5+.1*?+.2-A+2,*+5+G,EH?+.2;,-+53,*+124;4;DI4;1-<5,456 J2-K+1,+38+3+2./.53;,.,+8<534560,*+.;L4;BMDNF4//4-5.55<.//?8-2,*+5+G,EH?+.2;OBCPDEF4//4-5 45.//O.53,*+5BQDRF4//4-5J+2?+.2.8,+2,*.,D S,T;.5.22+;,456;+,-8U6<2+;0F<,4,2+V+1,;,*+;1./+-8,*+124;4;0,*+1-:J/+G4,?-84,;1.<;+;0.53,*+ 3+62++,-W*41*4,*.;F++55+6/+1,+3F?/-1./.53;,.,+/+.3+2;D XYZ[\ZY] ^_``abcde fghi_jb klmnopqrstuv[Zwxuyzu{w|Xu}}uY~YZ{x[uZw{u][nu~[XrZx Yo~{r~{nxYZ{r [[r[wnY][nmu{u[wu{xYo{mZ[vu{tr{u~
w nr~Zr~uwYrw[vn{rZ{oyoZo[wZup[wu\[u~rmu{sY\{Z[][w mu{u[w[[you}vu~ ooZsyrZ{][~{w}]Yw{kY~[mr~YZv 7./48-254.*.;45A+;,+32+1-23.:-<5,;-88<53456,-W.23*-:+/+;;5+;;452+1+5,?+.2;0W*41**.; 2+;</,+345:-2+J+-J/+.11+;;456;*+/,+2;.533+12+.;+;45,*+J2-J-2,4-5-8J+-J/+W*-.2+ <5;*+/,+2+3D<,-5/?*-:+;+53*-:+/+;;5+;;0;.?;I+FF4+)*4+/+02+64-5./:.5.6456342+1,-28-2 ,*+7-2J-2.,4-58-2<JJ-2,4A+9-<;456D>53,*+;,.,+*.;5+A+23+A+/-J+3.1-:J2+*+5;4A+J/.58-2 4,;45A+;,:+5,;.53*-<;4568-2J+-J/+W*-.2+W4,*-<,*-:+;D -2,*+;,.,+0,*+<+;,4-54;;-F46.;,-F+-:54J2+;+5,D7./48-254.*.;,*+/.26+;,*-:+/+;; J-J</.,4-545,*+1-<5,2?0+;,4:.,+345,*4;2+J-2,.,EH0PPPJ+-J/+D>;*-<;4561-;,;45-;>56+/+;0 .52.514;1-.53-,*+214,4+;1-5,45<+,-24;+0,*+J2-F/+:W4//-5/?62-WW-2;+.5+;,4:.,+3 HQP0PPP*-<;+*-/3;W4//+GJ+24+51+*-:+/+;;5+;;-A+2,*+5+G,EH?+.2;48,2+53;1-5,45<+D5*+2 U2;,8<//3.?45-1+/.;,W++L0> .?-2¡.2+5.;;3+1/.2+3.;,.,+-8+:+26+51?,-.332+;;,*., 14,?T;<5;*+/,+2+3*-:+/+;;5+;;J2-F/+:D mu{u[wrZ[xr~ u~
\rw{¢[[yoyqu{x{x[mu{srpru}s~[qw}[{{[Z¢mu{u[wrZ[ xr~ u~
\rw{¢[[yoyqu{x{x[mu{srpru}s~[qw}[{{[Z¢mu{u[wrZ[xr~ u~
\rw{¢ [[yoyqu{x{x[mu{srpru}s~[qw}[{{[Z¢ £¤¥¦¥§¨©ª«¨¬¬®®¬©¯§§°¥§«¬°±ª²¥ª¦¬°¨£¤¥¦¥§¨©ª«¨¬¬®®¬©¯§§°¥§«¬°±ª²¥ª¦¬°¨£¤¥¦¥§¨©ª«¨¬¬®®¬© ¯§§°¥§«¬°±ª²¥ª¦¬°¨
!
" #
$$%&&&'##'&
$ ""$
"%"""
""
" "#"
"(
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`.a@W;,</>,*-;501:*+H//+2=3@b0./;4CF022;::++8 Y30=-36-5-33+3/105/.,*-,-26-;C4+7;/:Rc0/:1-20./3@>9;43-4?*-/?5-2-:;,-33@5+?.,+? .4/*+3:+5+?*02+3+//4+//./;4C:*+\b0./;4C9;5/:_20?+3:*-:A-/T5/::*+05;]+?;4:*+ dIeF-3;1054;-G/*0./;4C4++?/-//+//2+4:3-@/0.:-/;2;3-56-:*8 )*+5+-5+-1+A,04,+54/:*-::*+5+605:?0+/4G:-??5+//8^:;/6+CC+?:0-*0./;4C;4f-:;045-:+01 K8LZ>,04/;/:+4:A;:*650X+,:;04/./+?=@:*+/:-:+G/*0./;4C?+6-5:2+4:=.:0.:01/:+6A;:*5+,+4:
ghijklmnnmoplhmoqrsltnmrouvtpswwnrnxwysmzt{hyr|m{hto}~wslirqwszm{wto}nrsw{wmzwrwsito}srlrnmroiqsrl g|rrlkwsp y|wtiwwonwstzt|m}wltm|t}}swii
!
" #
$$%&&&'##'&
$ ""$
"%"""
""
" "#"
"(
)*+,-)./0-1-*21342-)5637882953:2130-;12<+5;12=-2:=287=;2>-15?-53):954+5;)2=93+25) 4+1-83=@.A2142-)+37882953:2130-3237=5--42:7B2147C=-02?-)+5D7=+:215+7.E--3+5;4-?75432 30-*2+5330731-53)C-;+532:7==<+30+525-F30+142:73-57536)+582?-G30-)3754714:217B2147C+=+3@H <+==1-I9+1-30-825)31983+252::71?21-02?-)7812))30-)373-32?--34-?754. J9330-*1+8-2:42+5;5230+5;829=4C-:710+;0-1.K54-130-)3739)I92L-?-1;-58@122?)754M7+=) )-1>-*-2*=-)=--*+5;2530-)31--321)319;;=+5;<+3080125+8?-537=+==5-))-)73-521?29)82)3L<0+=- 30-2**21395+3+-):21*-2*=-<+3029302?-)71-=+?+3-421)I9754-1-4.N175;-D2953@7=25-)*-53 5-71=@OPQQ?+==+2525*9C=+8)-1>+8-):2102?-=-))*-2*=-+57)+5;=-@-71L<+3025=@07=:2:3073;2+5; 32<714029)+5;./0-47?7;-3230-)373-6)-8252?@+)*12:2954R32)7@5230+5;2:30-071?32 *-2*=-6)=+>-).S-4-17=029)+5;2T8+7=)-)3+?73-3073+382)3)37U*7@-1)3-5)2:3029)754)2:42==71)*-1 @-71:217*-1)2532)=--*2530-)31--3). VW>-1@25-)7@)@291C94;-371-@291>7=9-)LXY+8,))7+4.VZ:@29=22,7330-D7=+:215+7)373-C94;-3L 30-1-+)5237=+5-+3-?3073)7@):954+5;:2102?-=-))5-)).X
!
" #
$$%&&&'##'&
$ ""$
"%"""
""
" "#"
"(
)
!
" #
$$%&&&'##'&
$ ""$
"%"""
""
" "#"
"(
)
!
" #
$$%&&&'##'&
$ ""$
"%"""
""
" "#"
"(
)
*+,-$**
(
.
$
/
+
(
( 0 #1'
'23
$3+
-!
2+$2
%
!
" #
$$%&&&'##'&
$ ""$
"%"""
""
" "#"
"(
!"#$
#%"&"
!'''&%"&"'!
((((
((
(
( (!")*( +((+ (, -* .
/001234455562789:;<=8>6?@;4=8524/@A2<=B40<12C:=DC:DE<?8C7@>C0:FG<=BC0@CH@A>CG<D2C:I@A0C /@;8F822=8224:>0<?F8JKL?MN8OOCPPQ7CNN8DC:QNIC?7R7PDSNMPR:6/0;F TUVWXYZ[W \]^]_^]`abcdef^a_ghbijkbalmfn^olbgp^]i_qfna lfr]g]ddi]dd sHTHD=8Ht@/=2@=uv9:;<=8>20:775><08>u w@ENxKMKK y7:;<FH1:2282IH:08=0@=0/85:H0@W8=D8>F@<=z@;;A=<0HvF8;8=0:>HT?/@@F<=T:={>:=?<2?@@=W/A>2D:H6 z>:<BX884W/8v9:;<=8> |}~}} }}
}
}
}~}}} ~
}~ ¡¢
!"#$
#%"&"
!'''&%"&"'!
((((
((
(
( (!")*( +((+ (, -* .
/01234567892:72;8<63535269=>2?36@:?;:84>96@?63A BCDEFGHIEJKLGCMNGKNOCMMEPQIRDSTICUQRGMVEMWIEMLGKLHEMXICYCYZCIKNEJ[GMTEZHQN DHYCJCKKMCKKUGNDDCIYHNDCI\IHYESHQMTETC]VDCICLHYYCMXKTQGXGMTLHMFCIKENGHMKZEKCXHM ^QCKNGHMKNDENLDGJXICMIEGKCNDCYKCJFCKEZHQNDHYCJCKKMCKK]_HNHMJSXHCKNDCRIHLCKKCMTETC NDCGILQIGHKGNS`ZQNGNDCJRKEREICMNEFHGXEKKQYGMTUDENELDGJXYESEJICEXSNDGM[HI[MHUEZHQN NDCGKKQC] aHNE^QGCN[GXbcISHRCMdCMXCX^QCKNGHMK`PQIRDSKESK]WHI[GXKCeRCIGCMLGMTDHYCJCKKMCKK`fgHU XHCKYHFGMTYE[CSHQ\CCJbhHIfiDENXHSHQDCEIEZHQNDHYCJCKKMCKKENKLDHHJbh WHI\EYGJGCKUDHCMLHQMNCIDHYCJCKKMCKKENE\QINDCIXGKNEMLC`JG[CNDIHQTDYCXGEHIREKKGMTZSHM NDCKGXCUEJ[`EK[UDENNDCSNDGM[] fjGXKEICKQRCILQIGHQKEJICEXS`hKEGXPQIRDS`fZQNG\NDC[GXGKYHICGMNIHFCINCX`EMHRCMdCMXCX ^QCKNGHMGKNDCZCKNUESNHTCNEICKRHMKC]h kl:2@m352<@9?34@:n29?;36@:?opq;7r6:s5@t272??:2??<635r68?6:u0v0
!"#$
#%"&"
!'''&%"&"'!
((((
((
(
( (!")*( +((+ (, -* .
/0123456789:7;9<<82<859=73744>2853=7847?=53:544@742>A2@453:BC73=9D5DD3744936 4@E4=93?7@47 FGHIJKLMNNMOPNNLQNGPRSNMKLNTOQJUVSORLGWGHLGXYNOLTKRSMOZNRW[IMR\MOWM]HI^SWU_GI WGHP`NIaSKQLINP\OMKb^QNINM^GPMNaOPcNdLGPeRRGHaSRSOR\QNReMOMJZGISNQ^Ufgh^QOKPRSORTN LGPeRTOPRRGRGHaSGI^HRRSKP`MKPGHIcGLWKZTNLGPeRJPGTTSNINKReMcNNPU iINRNNPMOPLRNNPO`NIMQKJNQWSOjNMGbNOTOINPNMMGZLIH`MOPLbNPROQSNOQRS\OPLRSORbOWcNO bGINO^^IG^IKORNO`NRGMSOINRSORMGbN^NG^QNMRIH``QNTKRSLIH`HMN\TSKaSaOPcNRINORNL\cHR RSNWbOWPGRSOjNOSGbNGILGaRGIUkGPjNIMORKGPMOIGHPLGjNILGMKP`OPL^INjNPRKGPbOWcNbGIN O^^IG^IKORNZGIGQLNIRNNPO`NaSKQLINP\]HI^SWMOKLU dlSNINKMPGINOMGPRGcNZNOIZHQROQJKP`OcGHRRSKMU]OPWSK`SMaSGGQMRHLNPRMTKQQNh^NIKbNPRTKRS LIH`MOPLOQaGSGQ\f]HI^SWMOKLUdlOQJKP`OcGHRLIH`MLGNMPeRbNOPRSNWTKQQLGLIH`MUmOjKP`QNMM JPGTQNL`NOaRHOQQWbOJNMRSNbbGINaHIKGHMGZRNPOPLQKJNQWRGRIWKRUFGHMNNRSORKPOQGRGZLORO QKJNRNNPO`N^IN`POPaWUnReMcNRRNIRGJPGTTSORKRKMOPLRSNMKLNNZZNaRMGZTSORaOPSO^^NPKZWGH HMNLIH`MUf lSNINeMPGM^NaK[aO`NRGMROIROaGPjNIMORKGP\OPLNOaSZObKQWeMNh^NIKNPaNKMLKZZNINPRUdlSNcNMR RSKP`KMRGcNMRIOK`SRH^TKRSRSNbUVNLGPeRTOPRRGSKLNZOaRMGIbOPK^HQORNGHITGILaSGKaNM\f MOKL]HI^SWUdVNPNNLRGbNNRJKLMTSNINRSNWOINORUf ]OI`GRoHMSNQ\LKINaRGIGZpkq_eMrNPKGZZmGHMKP`OPLmGbNQNMMPNMMnPKRKORKjN\MH``NMRMZIObKP` KMMHNMOIGHPLcOMKaPNNLM\OPLSGTQOaJKP`RSGMNaOPQNOLMGbNGPNRGOaRLNM^NIORNQWU dnRIWRGbGLNQSGTNjNIWcGLWSOMPNNLMUnZMGbNGPNKMHIKPORKP`GPRSNMRINNR\TNMOWNjNIWcGLW SOMRG`GRGRSNcORSIGGb\OPLTSORSO^^NPMKZRSNINKMPeRGPNXfMSNMOKLUdnaOPeRcNRSNGPQW ^OINPRTSGSOM^HQQNLGjNIGPOQGP`SK`STOWMGRSNKIJKLaGHQLHMNRSNcORSIGGbUf s0t9u7949>7=v<D93w5=A2@=4=5:C9=5x53:2=A784 yGPeRROQJRGMRIOP`NIMKMOMKb^QNIHQNGZRSHbc\MOKLoHMSNQUdnP`NPNIOQ\QKRRQNJKLMMSGHQLPGR`G H^OPLROQJRGIOPLGbMRIOP`NIMUqGRSORTOMHPKjNIMOQ\TSNRSNIRSNWTNINHPSGHMNLGISGHMNLUf lSOROTOINPNMMMSGHQLPeRaGbNORRSNNh^NPMNGZOPGRSNI^NIMGPU
!"#$
#%"&"
!'''&%"&"'!
((((
((
(
( (!")*( +((+ (, -* .
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`^QU^PVabcVdeP\Pf`^UghN[Nb_]RVRP`Q_Vi_jUcQ^U]PVP``SP``
!"#$
#%"&"
!'''&%"&"'!
((((
((
(
( (!")*( +((+ (, -* .
/0123243567895:8;73<7=11>?@873=A2?3B2671788C788DE8=5:F7CC547<G<57:7CA=HBD7I7H?35J7 :5<7H32<243B7K2=15352C2CL2671788C788M/N2?H=C6=978=C:O5HB78=C:B=C:3B762?3D>2?H=C :2=H35J535783B=3=<7<7=11>A7=?354?1MPB=387<J5H72<:25C;6?3?=1=5:H=CA7<7=11>=@25C324@<5:7 42<95:8ME QRSTUVWXUYXZUW[U\V]U^V__Y`^Y`Za^VbWWYcUWTUVWUa dJ7<>2C7e8@7<82C=17I@7<57CH7O53BB2?85C;=C:B2671788C78858:5447<7C3Mf=973B=g57<H7D= 623B7<243B<77OB2B=87I@7<57CH7:B2671788C7885CB7<C=35J7h=CG<=CH58H2D17=C82C3B7;21:7C <?17iP<7=323B7<8B2O>2?O=C332A73<7=37:M /h3=>;<=374?1D83=>B?6A17D=C:=1O=>89C2O3B=37J7<>A2:>:787<J78=B267DE8B78=5:M/j2Ce3 7J7<3B5C9>2?H=Ce3H<7=37HB=C;7MdJ7C3B786=113B5C;8Mk3e8=6=l5C;B2O>2?H=C877=@7<82C 323=11>83<?;;15C;=C:>2?=89543B7>C77:=m=H9732<8267O=37<D53H=C3?<C3B5C;8=<2?C:MPB7 O=>>2?3<7=3@72@17H=C<7=11>6=9782672C7e8:=>=C:HB=C;73B76MP<7=3@72@17B2O>2?O2?1: O=C332A73<7=37:ME
!"#$
#%"&"
!'''&%"&"'!
((((
((
(
( (!")*( +((+ (, -* .
/012304562752 89:;<9=>?;@>;AB@BCDEFGH?<BFI?J<C>JI<JBII?<8B;KJB;HG@H>LMBNG;<JO PQRSRTUVWXYZR[\X]^\X_YXY\_]^``RSa_bYRS[cS^aXY]dYQ_d[Reb_f^Y[\^Ye[
! "
#$
%
&
!
"
!#"
! "
#$
'
#"
$ (
)
)
#
!
)
# #(
"('
""*
'"#"(
'
")"!
"(*
"
(
#
!
!
" ( !+
$
'
,"!
'
$
#
$"
#
*
"
!
!"") *
"
(
"
!
## !!
"
#!
"!! !!
'
!*
"
"
'
#
("!*
"
'
"
"
!! !+
- #
.""(
/
0$
1""
" !/
0"
"# *
$1
2 "$#
1 !(
"
3"
/
0 "
4 )"5
1 "
6#
! /
789:;<8=>
?@ABCD
ECFAG
HH
3" *
IJI
K"!
*
LHJMN
OPIMQOIPHN
CR
B?CG
IOMI
$
" "*
IOJ
"
0!S*
LHIQN
TJOQTMOPIL
CUBCV?@AE
HTTJ
"
5 1
*
IJT
#5*
LHMNH
LINOQQQOII
WWWXYZZ[\]^_`ab]ca]_]YadeXfag
!
"
#! $
!
%
&
' ( (
!
)
*
! $%
+"
'%
,"
**
,-
.!
%
,/
''!
,)
* %
*
'
0 $
#'
*
*
*
#'
*
-
%!*
%!
!
#'
*
)
!
'' #
1
*%
'' #
1
2 $
"+
'' #
1
!
!
",
!
"
# $$
$
$
%
!& "
' (
)
%
*
*
"
%&%
$
%
( + $
)
+!,
%
$
'!- +.
' !+'
/
+
"
&
!$
%
' ! !
( + $
$
+!+
$
++ $$
/
,
+
%
$
!& "
//!$.
#
%! %$
/
+
"
&
!$0
+"
%
+
"
' " $0
%
+
+
", $ %
!( 1 $
$$$ %
)
$' +$
/
+
0
/!
' (
($
(
/
+
%
'
, +
/
$
! '!.
2345
6789:5
;<=>?
@85
75A7;48BB6
C4DD4;=B?E
$
FGHIJK
'! $ %
"
+ ( $
$
++ $$/
+'
/
+
.
L/ !
" ! (
'$'
%
' % +0
+
%
,
'
$ %
, +*
E
?<
M7N9=896E
@4?3
O=5?
8 D7@
@77P5:
><+ .
L
Q
)
%
*
(&
$' +
*$
%&%
$
+
!! "
R' ! +(
$$ $$
)
+ %
$
$
!& "!$
%
(
% $
%
!(
+
.
S
!
% %+
%
*) %( 0
# $$
$
$
%
!& "
)
%
&
,
,
+%
+
$
//!$.
"
'!&% %
++ $$
%
*) %(
,
+
"
)
%
&
,
, ,
)
!
$
''!.
$
%&%
$
*
/
!
% "
' !+'
$
//!
%
)
)
*$.
TUVWXYZ
T[\]]^]_
`Vaa^ZZXX
b !"
b $*0
F//+
/
''!&
#
$(.
c
d
! $0
F//+
/
''!&
#
$(.
e+
& !0
F//+
/
''!&
#
$(0
&
(0
F//+
/
''!&
#
$(0
f 1
S(0
F//+
/
''!&
#
$(.
'
f 10
"
/
f$g.
G $$
h ! 0
"
/
f$g.
TV^]Zij]ik^aX
lmU^no^YZ^V]\[
pm]oXUn
q
"
/
',
q
"
/
e!(
#
q
"
/
' !
q
"
/
e
G )
q
"
/
r !"
q
"
/
L
q
"
/
c$
L $
q
"
/
f$g
q
)
/
c$
L $
# $
q
"
/
! (
q
)
/
c$
r $
q
"
/
!
q
"
/
e ' $
q
"
/
"&
q
"
/
e
!
q
"
/
!
sZtXU
uYv]Vw[Xo_XaX]Zn
/ )(
!( 1 $
) !
& & %
' (
%
%
! '!(
'!+ $$x
q
L,%
q
I $ x
#
q
h
S $
!
q
L#
q
hy+
$
q
I))
! $
zI
{
q
|
$ %
Q $'$
r!
'
z|Qr{
q
!
"
F//+
/
}%
+
q
"
/
!
F//+
/
''!&
#
$(
q
'
q
#
$(
L
!"
!
"&
"
!&+ $
!
"
""
#"
$ %
&
'((%
)
"
"
"
&
"
&
#
$ *
+
,
-)
)
( )).
$!$ /
"
0
& /
"
-0 /. "
)
)
-)).
"
'((%
)
""
0 /$ )
! )
) ))
""
#
123
))
$ ! )
) "
*!4
'((%
)
5336
"&
#$ *!4
53
#"
)
$ %
7
&
"
0 / "&
8 9 :;<=> ?@ A@;B?<BC DBEF>G?>H>= I@J>G>EE K>@LG>8
)" 0
)
"&
A@B=;M?<BC N O@;?F A@;B?P 9 Q@@GR<?S
T UV WVWVX Y Z Y[\ ]
0
)
!
&
#"
#"
*!4
"
&
$ %
&
) )
"
(&
"
7
$ %
"
5355 ' )
5355 ! )
) 0
'((%
) !
$ %
5355 ' )
"
"
,
^ _ '
&
` _ ] "
&
"
7
"
" "
""` _ a
&
""
7
bcddefghijk lmcnmokk hcpqmr ofrgfn scdotokkfokku _ ]
"&
""
` _ *
"
&""
$ _ a
"
"
""
"
)
"
_ v &
""
#"
)
w )xy]/(z{
7
! )
) /
"
'&
0 $
!
!
"#$
%&'
" (
(
) !! !!
(*
+,!
! "-
!
" (
.)
" !
"/"
,)!
,"
(,) !0
1 2/3
,
!
4 */! "
4 5).)#
*
4*/, )#
4 *, "
! ) *
" !3, "
4*/"
4*,*#
)/3
,**,3 6
*
1 7
,
4*,*#
3
* !" .
,
!
,
4 5).
*
4*/,
4),.
" !3 "
(*
*
*",*)#
! "
,!
,
* 3
),*
!) 43
,..",
(*
,
5 3!$
.)
"3
,
.,*$
4,*8$
,5," "
5 )"3$
5 !
*
*,
!,$
,*4*$
*
.,43
3*
"-
!!
"
! !
#"
$
!
%
%
!
%
"
!!
&"
#'
!! !!(
)
#!! %
$
$
*'
"
#" !+
,
-./.012
340..4
567/48
9
'
#
$
!
%
!!
%:%
!
%
$
!
; <
=>?
(
!
#
% %
!
!
"'
%
!
!
@
<
!
%
!
!@
"
A!?
!?
%
A !$
!
!@
%
: #
!
%
<
% %
"
"
!(
,
-./.012
3B.24.0
567/48
9 '
#
$
!!
%:%
!
%
$
!
!
'
"
<
#
%
"
:
"
%
!
!
; <
=?
(
!
#
% %
!
*
##
" %
' #
!
!?
!
!'?
%
!
$
: !(
!
!
!
#
% %
$
*'
!
""
#" !+
,
C10D.4.E
340..4
567/4
6F
G674B
1/E
G67/D
HE724I8
9
$
#
$
!
%
##"
%
%
'
%
!
%
J
!
%
; <
=
%?
(
,
C10D.4.E
5KL
340..4
567/4
6F
MNOP
347E./4I
1/E
CB.Q0
R1SQ2Q.I+
9 #
$
!
%
!!
!
% !
%
$
!
"
%
<
T$$#
$
U%
#
%
"
#"
'
!#
%!
#!
$
'
$
; <
=?
(
,
V6S.2.II
370W.X8
9
"
!
: *
$
!
%
%
!
%
%:%
!
#%
# %
<
"
%
#
!
$$
!
:
!
* A!
$
*'
'
!
#
(
Y
$
!
:
*
! %
$
!
!
!
!(
!
! #
$
"
"
:% !
!
$
!
!
$
!
!(
;
#"
!?
!
!
$
"
!
"
:% %
%
<
%
!
%
!$'
%
#!
$
!! !!
:
(
;
$
'
%'
!
#
%
' ?
"
!
!
Z[[\]^_`
Za
b\cde^efeghi
!
" !
#$%$&'
( !))
*( ! +,
- )) ))
.
!,
&$&&
/
0 1!
2!3
&4!.
2.
&5 6
)
! (! ) )
2 47
+! 2)
8!
&$#96
( !+ 2,
8
( !))
-:,
)! )
. +! 2) .
)-, -3
8!
&$#9%
" -
( !+ 2,
8
( !))
)23,
) - !)
+! 2) .
13 4$76
)
+! 2)
( !))
)23,
) - !)
)
-; -3
.
+! 2) .
:.
8 .,
2--+2 .
) - !)
2.
+! 2) .
+
3
88!)
"2!.)
+! 2),
) - !
+2(2+36
< =
>
< =
>
?@A@B?
CDEE
CDEF
CDEG
CDEH
CDEI
CDCC
JEIKJCC
L
MNAOPQ
?RSTUSVSW
XYZ[Z
XY[\]
XY[^[
XY[_`
XY]Z_
^Ya^b
abc
BdeRSTUSVSW
\YX`[
\Y`]_
_Y`^]
\Y__Z
]Y[^^
]Y]bZ
fac
@gUhT
HiDjH
HijFE
jiGGj
HiFIk
IiHDj
EDiDCl
FL
]Yb`]
]Y`aX
`Y\\`
]Ya[_
[Y]b`
XbYb^Z
^bXX ^bXa^bX\^bX]^bX[^b^^
]ac ]_c ]Xc ]_c Z^c ]]c ^]c ^`c ^[c ^`c XZc ^ac
^bXX ^bXa^bX\^bX]^bX[^b^^
mnopqrsqtqu vpqrsqtqu
!"#$%
&$'($)#*+$
(,*)+$
-*.
)"#
(*/(0/*#$1
2"'
'"-.
-3#,
/$..
#,*)
45 3)136310*/.7
89:;<=;>?;@A
9A<BCD?C:C=
<BCD?C:C=
?@?ED
FGHIFJJ
JMNH
JMJJ
JMNH
JMJJ
JMNH
JMJJ
K
>BEALC
?OPQR
;STOUVOUQPWX
YZ[\]
YZ^\^
_Z\`^
]Z]ab
`Z]^[
`Z[c^
\d
efgh
ij
eklmnopp
Y^
]_[
b
b
Y^
]_[
_`_d
efgh
ij
eqmorgfsi
_\`
_b]
b
b
_\`
_b]
ta[d
efgh
ij
ufprih
a^\
[b[
a\`
]bc
Yb^
c_^
_[d
efgh
ij
viw
xpgiw
Y[
[\
b
b
Y[
[\
t_^d
efgh
ij
viw
xpgiw
yfppw
]
b
b
b
]
b
z
{i|s
ij
viw
ukgiw
_[
\c
b
b
_[
\c
z
efgh
ij
}fpmfgkw
_]\
]^`
b
]\
_]\
]Y^
__`d
efgh
ij
}isgo
~orosi
b
b
b
b
b
b
z
efgh
ij
}irks
yfpp
__^
[b
b
b
__^
[b
t^Yd
efgh
ij
}iqsgkfs
fo|
\Y^
]b[
a]
_^b
[b[
a^[
t^ad
efgh
ij
kpi
xpgi
]``
][a
_^
__
a_a
]Y^
t_]d
efgh
ij
~ks
iw
\Z__Y
^Z`Y\
`cb
_Z[Y\
[Zb`Y
[Z[\b
cd
efgh
ij
~ksgk
epkrk
][^
aY\
[]
[\
a][
^^b
a\d
efgh
ij
~krkgik
_b
b
b
b
_b
b
z
efgh
ij
~qsshkpo
^YY
]Y`
_^Y
_b[
[]^
ac\
tacd
?OPQR
9S