Planning Commission Staff Report of July 13, 2023 — City Council and Authorities Concurrent, August 22, 2023

City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION

SUBJECT
Consideration of an Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map for the Property Located at 906-950 Monroe Street and 1341 Homestead Road (CEQA: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was Prepared for the Project)

REPORT IN BRIEF
Applicant: Salvatore Caruso Design Corporation
Owner: Lamb Partners, LLC
General Plan: Community Mixed-Use (20-36 DU/AC) (Commercial FAR 0.1) Zoning: General Office (OG), Historical Combining (HT), and Community Commercial Site Area: 0.87 acres (38,180 square feet)
Existing Site Conditions:

The project site is made up of multiple parcels currently developed with three single-family residences at 906 Monroe Street, 930 Monroe Street, and 1341 Homestead Road and a larger commercial building located at 950 Monroe Street. All three residential structures would be preserved in the new development, while the residential accessory structures and commercial building would be removed. Both the residences located at 906 and 930 Monroe Streets are designated resources on the City’s Historical and Resource Inventory (HRI). 906 Monroe Street and 1341 Homestead Road are currently situated on the same lot. 950 Monroe is a separate, larger commercial lot. The project area is a mix of modern and classical architectural styles and while located in the Old Quad neighborhood, there is no single defining neighborhood architectural style.

Surrounding Land Uses:
· North: Franklin Street, four-story mixed-use residential with ground floor commercial · South: Homestead Road, two-story multi-family residential · East: Monroe Street and Franklin Square Mall
· West: Single-family residences and one-story commercial Issues:

Consistency with the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Staff Recommendation:

That Planning Commission adopt resolutions recommending City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), make CEQA Findings, and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); approve the General Plan Amendment; approve the Rezone with conditions; and approve the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map for the property located at 906-950 Monroe Street and 1341 Homestead Road.

City of Santa Clara Page 1 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023

BACKGROUND
On June 16, 2020, Lamb Partners LLC (“Owner”) filed an application to redevelop the property located at 906-950 Monroe and 1341 Homestead Road from commercial and single-family residences to a mixed-use residential project with on- and off-site improvements. The proposal includes a General Plan Amendment and Rezone of the property to change the land use designation and zoning, and environmental analysis of potential impacts associated with project development as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The requisite applications have been submitted and are the subject of this staff report.

Specifically, the proposed project includes for Planning Commission consideration an EIR and MMRP; a General Plan Amendment, Rezoning from General Office (OG), Historic Combining (HT), and Community Commercial (CC) to Planned Development (PD), and a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (File No. PLN2020-14457), that would collectively allow the development of a sixstory mixed-use project comprised of 50 multi-family residential units, four townhomes, and three single-family residences (average density is 65.5 DU/AC). The project would also include on-site parking and amenities, landscaping, off-site improvements, and an 871 square foot community meeting room available for use by the general community.

Project Description
The three existing single-family residences on the project site will remain in the same location with upgraded landscape in front of 1341 Homestead Road. The existing accessory buildings on these lots will be replaced with a one-car garage for 906 Monroe Street and a two-car garage for 930 Monroe Street. A non-original addition in the rear of 930 Monroe would be demolished to restore the original form of the historic residence.

The portion of the mixed-use building immediately adjacent to the residences at 906 and 930 Monroe Street would be 41 feet in height (three stories) and is designed to have brick cladding. The architectural façade treatment changes multiple times as the building steps up from this height to a height of 84 feet (six stories) at the northeast corner of the project site. The design of the proposed mixed-use building is in this way a mix of architectural styles intended to convey a smaller, more traditional urban scale and thus provide a downtown look and feel. The site would be wrapped with a separated sidewalk and landscape strip to provide a typical urban interface to the public street. The development makes use of below grade parking with a garage entrance on the ground floor, accessible from Franklin Street.

The four townhouses are proposed to be two stories in height (three-bedroom units) designed with contemporary architecture. Amenity space for the townhouses is limited to rear second-story balconies and minimal front and rear yards. Access to the townhomes would be limited to pedestrian pathways on Homestead Road, Franklin Street, and basement parking. Delivery access would be limited to the pedestrian path and waste management is provided in the parking garage of the mixeduse building.

For the two historic single-family residences, a driveway on Homestead Road would provide access to a new one-car garage for 906 Monroe Street, and a driveway from Monroe Street provides access to a new two-car garage for 930 Monroe Street.

The project proposes a total of 81 parking spaces on site to accommodate the residence at 1341 City of Santa Clara Page 2 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023
Homestead, the four townhomes, and the 50 condominium units (a parking ratio of one space for every one-bedroom unit and 1.5 spaces for every two-bedroom unit) and 9 parking spaces to support the commercial use. Of the total parking spaces provided, 29 are identified as level 2 EV ready and 27 will be low power level 2 EV ready. There will also be 54 Class I in the bike room of the basement and ten Class II bicycle parking spaces on the ground floor. Outlets are provided in the bike room for electric bikes.

Changes from Prior Project Design
In an initial submittal, the applicant proposed to develop a five-story structure with podium at-grade and four stories above with 61 residential units at a density of 70 dwelling units per acre (DU/AC). In that proposal, all existing structures, including the three single-family residences, two of which are listed on the Historical and Resource Inventory list, were to be demolished. Following community outreach by the owner, and in response to comments and concerns expressed by neighboring residents regarding building height immediate to residential properties, historic preservation, and architectural style, the project was revised. The current proposal is a six-story structure tapering down to three-stories adjacent to the listed HRI properties, with four townhouses immediately adjacent to single-family neighbors to the west. The proposal also retains the three existing residences with demolition of their accessory structures to allow for the construction of three new covered parking spaces.

Relationship to Downtown
The proposed project is within the boundaries of the Downtown Focus Area but not within the Downtown Core as designated in the General Plan. In 2018, the City Council initiated a planning process to develop a Downtown Precise Plan to provide a more detailed level of land use policy and design standards to support the successful revitalization of the City’s historic downtown area into a vibrant neighborhood that would act as a destination within the community. A Downtown Community Task Force (DCTF) was appointed to guide the Precise Plan planning process. The DCTF has held 39 meetings and the Community Development Department hosted several community outreach events to develop the draft two land use policy documents to guide future development within the downtown area: a Precise Plan and a Form-based Code. Drafts of both documents have been circulated for public comment and are currently being refined to address comments received during the public circulation. The five-year planning process is nearing the end with anticipated City Council consideration of the Precise Plan and Form-based Code at the end of 2023 and/or in early 2024. A draft of the Downtown Form Based Zoning Code was completed and made publicly available in June of 2022.

The planning process for the Downtown Focus Area was initiated prior to the formal submittal of this application, but has not been completed and therefore is not yet established as City land use policy. If the Precise Plan and Form Based Zoning Code are adopted by the City Council, future development will be evaluated for consistency with those documents, and specific modifications to the Precise Plan and Form Base Zoning Code would be necessary prior to adoption as a result of some deviations, as discussed below.

DISCUSSION
The following analysis considers how the proposed project would or would not be consistent with applicable City policies including the City’s General Plan, Zoning Code and Subdivision Ordinance.

General Plan Conformance
City of Santa Clara Page 3 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023
The following analysis address how the project would be consistent with specific components of the General Plan.

General Plan Land Use Diagram
The site is currently designated Community Mixed Use on the City’s General Plan Land Use Diagram. This designation is intended to support medium-density development with a mix of residential and commercial uses along a major street. Development within this designation requires a minimum FAR of 0.10 of retail, commercial, and neighborhood office uses, in combination with residential development between 20 and 36 units per acre. The project as proposed would not be in conformance with this land use designation. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment to revise the specifications of the Community Mixed Use land use designation within the Downtown Focus Area.

The proposed General Plan Amendment would keep the existing land use designation for the Project Site of Community Mixed Use, but would amend the text of the Community Mixed Use designation to allow for very high-density housing (to a maximum of 70 dwelling units per acre) on mixed-use sites within the Downtown Focus Area that meet the following criteria:

1. The property is located within 0.25 miles of a fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours;

2. The property is designated Community Mixed Use;

3. The development provides ground floor retail uses at a minimum FAR of 0.10;

4. If the project site is listed on the City’s Historic Preservation and Resource Inventory or the California Register of Historical Resources, any development affecting the historically significant structure shall be performed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties; and

5. The project provides for affordable housing through the payment of in-lieu fees and/or includes affordable units.

The proposed project meets the above criteria as it is located within 0.25 miles of a high-frequency bus route (VTA Route 60), is designated as Community Mixed Use within the Downtown Focus Area, is occupied by two HRI sites and will satisfy the City’s affordable housing requirement by providing eight affordable housing units with one townhouse and seven condominium units. General retail commercial, including office use will provide a minimum commercial FAR of 0.10 in the proposed 3,874 square foot ground floor space.

General Plan Goals and Policies
The project is consistent with the following existing General Plan Policies as discussed below:

Downtown Focus Area
· 5.4.2
‐
G1 A Downtown that serves as a primary, pedestrian
‐
oriented commercial and cultural
destination.
· 5.4.2
‐
G2 New Downtown development that is integrated with older existing development with respect to intensity, scale and character.
· 5.4.2
‐
P11 For new mixed
‐
use development, locate medium
‐
and high
‐
density residential uses
on upper floors with active retail uses at ground level and oriented to street frontages.

The subject site is located within the boundary of the Downtown Focus Area as designated in the City of Santa Clara Page 4 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023
General Plan. The Focus Area is intended to offer opportunities for place ‐
making and for a unique
destination in the City to serve both local and regional interests. New development to revitalize the Downtown supports the General Plan Major Strategies for City identity and community vitality. The addition of a residential mixed-use building with ground floor commercial would provide the opportunity for new residents and new commercial uses in the downtown consistent with the intent of the Focus Area.

Residential Land Use Policies
· 5.3.2-P1: Encourage the annual construction of the housing units necessary to meet the City’s regional housing needs assessment (RHNA) by reducing constraints to housing finance and development.
· 5.3.2-P2: Encourage higher-density residential development in transit and mixed-use areas and in other locations throughout the City where appropriate. · 5.3.2-P3: Encourage indoor and outdoor private and common spaces as part of all new residential developments, including clustering of units to maximize open space opportunities where appropriate.

The proposed project would provide ground floor commercial uses in a mixed-use configuration and with 50 higher-density multi-family residential units above and four new townhouse units adjacent to the main building, adding 54 units to the City’s housing stock while also preserving three existing single-family residences. The project thus directly implements Policy 5.3.2.-P1. In addition to the services located in the mixed-use portion of the building, the new housing would be in proximity to public transportation and the downtown area with ease of connection to local and regional transit facilities and access to neighborhood and community commercial uses, support services, and outdoor open space and recreation areas as promoted by Policy 5.3.2-P2. The proposed building footprint and height allow the project to maximize open space and private use for the residents, while providing housing at a higher density, and includes a ground floor community space that is available to the community as encouraged by Policy 5.3.2-P3.

General Land Use Goals and Policies
· 5.3.1-P10: Provide opportunities for increased landscaping and trees in the community, including requirements for new development to provide street trees at a minimum 2:1 ratio onor off-site replacement for trees removed as part of the project to help increase the urban forest and minimize the heat island effect.
· 5.3.1-P12: Encourage convenient pedestrian connections within new and existing developments.

The proposed development plan includes landscaping of the site and project frontages with a variety of plant and tree species including 15 trees on site with 11 within the landscape strip along the project frontages.

The project includes the replacement of the existing sidewalks along the street frontages of the site with a landscape park strip and sidewalk consistent with the Complete Streets design standards. The tree-lined separated sidewalk is designed to facilitate pedestrian access and link neighboring land uses, consistent with Policy 5.3.1-P12.

The project is not wholly consistent with the following General Plan Policies as discussed below:

City of Santa Clara Page 5 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023
Downtown Focus Area Policy
· 5.4.2
‐
P7: Apply the General Plan Transition and Historic Preservation policies for new development at the edges of Downtown in order to respect the scale and character of the adjacent historic Old Quad neighborhood.

Transition Policies
· 5.5.2-P5: Require that new development provide an appropriate transition to surrounding neighborhoods.
· 5.5.2-P7: For buildings of three stories or greater, increase the setback of upper stories where they abut lower intensity residential uses.

While the project includes a new Planned Development Zoning that can establish standards unique to the property, the City typically compares proposed Planned Development Zoning standards to standards already established within the City’s Zoning Code for the same or similar type of development. For the purposes of evaluating the transition between new and existing uses, the City’s existing development standards can thus provide an objective criteria for evaluation of the proposed setbacks, height limitations and other factors necessary to promote land use compatibility and the transition between new and existing development. The project site is adjacent to low-intensity commercial uses along its northwest boundary and one-story single-family residences along its southwestern boundary and so can be compared to standards for the interface of townhouse and multifamily districts with those districts to evaluate whether the project provides an appropriate transition.

At its interface with adjacent uses the proposed project includes the preservation of an existing single -family residence (separate from the two historic residences being preserved in the project) and four new, two-story townhouses, the latter with a maximum height of 28 feet. The maximum height generally allowed in the Zoning Code for single-family residences is 25 feet, so the townhouses would be 3 feet taller than what could potentially be developed on the adjacent lot. All four townhouses include a rear balcony that faces the single-family residential properties to the west.

Although a rear balcony is generally allowed in the rear yard of the City’s single-family residential zoning districts, none is typically allowed with less than a 20-foot rear yard setback. In contrast, the proposed second-story balconies and egress windows would have a 10-foot setback from the abutting residential properties to the west. Based on the standards set forth in the City’s Zoning Code, the proposed project would not provide a sufficient setback to fully “provide an appropriate transition” to the adjacent residences as called for in Policy 5.5.2-P5.

For upper floor setbacks (or “step backs”) the City has an established practice of using a 45-degree step back requirement to determine an appropriate transition between new higher-intensity and existing lower-intensity land uses. The proposed development would include a step back in that the mixed-use building located adjacent to the historic houses to the north has a height of approximately 41 feet and increases in height to 84 feet as it moves away from the historic houses to the corner of Monroe and Franklin Streets (see Attachment 10). While the historic houses at 906 and 930 Monroe Street are being integrated into the project, they are also an existing use that would be subjected to a new interface condition. Both houses are one and a half stories or approximately 25 feet in height.

The height of the new mixed-use building that would be adjacent to the historic houses is threestories (38 feet in height). The proposed mixed-use building has a five-foot setback from the property line adjacent to the historic house. This combination of height and setback/step back are not City of Santa Clara Page 6 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023
sufficient to provide a 45-degree step back between the new and existing land uses and thus the project is not consistent with the historical application of Policy 5.5.2-P7.

Additionally, the portion of the building that is six stories in height is inconsistent with the text in the General Plan Downtown Focus Area intent statement, which states that the allowed building intensity and heights for development outside of the Downtown Core (as identified in the Focus Area Map (Figure 5.4-3) in the General Plan (Attachment 11)) is a maximum height between three to four stories, which is applicable to this site as it is not in the Downtown Core.

Prior to 2019, the City could rezone properties to Planned Development (PD) even where that zoning would result in an inconsistency with the General Plan, due to Santa Clara’s status as a charter city.

However, in 2018, the Legislature enacted Senate Bill 1333, which required that zoning amendments must be consistent with General Plans, even for charter cities. In addition, the proposal includes a subdivision map, and state law requires the Council to make a finding of General Plan consistency in order to approve any subdivision map. As such, the General Plan Amendment includes a proposal to modify Policies 5.5.2-P5, 5.5.2-P7, and the maximum height in the Downtown Focus Area, in order to allow for the project to proceed and eliminate the inconsistencies identified above.

Historic Preservation Policies
· 5.6.1
‐
P2 Protect the historic integrity of designated historic properties and encourage adaptive reuse when necessary to promote preservation.

The proposed development preserves the two historically designated structures (single-family residences) on the project site. The project would result in the removal of accessory structures (e.g., detached garages) on two of the historic properties, but these accessory structures are not considered historic and their removal would not infringe upon the historic integrity of the two residences. An analysis of the project for consistency with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for historic preservation concluded that the project would not have a significant impact upon the historic resources, although it did suggest that an increased setback and/or increased transition from those structure would improve the transition between the historic structures and new construction within the project. The project would in this way encourage adaptive reuse that preserves the historic structures.

Climate Action Plan
A Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program has been prepared for the proposed project to meet the criteria outlined in the City of Santa Clara Climate Action Plan (CAP), 2022. The 2022 CAP requires 20 percent VMT reduction for new multifamily residential developments, with 10 percent of the reduction resulting from active TDM measures. Some of the project measures noted include information and marketing of transportation options, a designated transportation coordinator and a subsidy, such as a transit pass, for residents. The program is attached to this report for review.

Zoning Code Conformance
A Planned Development Rezoning is required to allow development of the project as it includes a mix of development types and design standards that do not conform to any of the City’s standard zoning districts. In the following analysis, the proposed Planned Development zoning standards are evaluated based on current General Plan policies and the current Zoning Code.

City of Santa Clara Page 7 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023
While the Planned Development zoning process allows an applicant to propose any design standards, it is appropriate for the City to evaluate the proposed standards in relationship to the City’s adopted standards for similar types of development. The City’s Transit-Oriented Mixed Use (TMU) Combining Zoning District is the zoning district which most closely allows land uses near transit similar to the proposed project with an interface to an existing lower density neighborhood. The project is not proposing to rezone to the TMU District, however, because it is proposing a higher density at 65 DU/AC than allowable through the TMU District, which is intended for density between 26-45 DU/AC.

Per the Zoning Code, the stated intent of the TMU District is as follows:

The transit-oriented mixed use combining zoning district is intended to encourage quality high density residential development in close proximity to multiple transit lines and in conjunction with commercial development or redevelopment. This district also encourages the construction and use of housing without related commercial development. Mixed use districts encourage development that is consistent with the existing community because the districts are located in areas that have traditionally been zoned for commercial and office uses, but are adjacent to residentially zoned property. Combining housing with office and/or retail uses can increase the number and diversity of housing options available in the City, and is consistent with the City’s general plan policies for increasing housing. A variety of housing types and sizes may be provided in this zoning district. A percentage of the residential units should be affordable to low and/or moderate income households. A balance of ownership housing and rental housing is encouraged. The permitted density is from twenty-six (26) up to forty-five (45) dwelling units per acre, based on the total acreage of the site and in addition to any commercial use of the same property.

The following discussion also addresses when applicable consistency with the standards laid out in the draft Downtown Form Based Zoning Code that have been vetted through a community process.

The project site would be subject to these documents once they are adopted, but as noted above, the City has not yet adopted the draft Downtown Precise Plan and Form Based Code, so they are considered here only as a point of reference. Based upon these draft documents, the uses and densities within the proposed project are potentially allowed, but the project design does not entirely conform to the proposed Form Based Zoning Code standards, and the project does not propose sufficient community benefits in order to achieve the proposed building heights allowed by the Precise Plan proposal.

Site Design
The proposed design for the townhouses has some shortcomings in that the townhouses will not have a strong connection to a public street, or the standard amount of open space expected for similar units in the Zoning Code. Access to the units will be provided either through a stairwell connection to the underground parking below, which exits onto a pedestrian walkway leading to the units, or from the street by the same walkway. The walkway has a ‘dogleg’ configuration so that unit entries are not visible from the street, a condition generally considered undesirable in regard to community building or public safety considerations and not supported within the City’s standard zoning districts.

The proposed design is a result of the applicant’s objective to fully utilize the parcels available, retaining the three single-family residences and maintaining a height of two stories at the rear of the development. The applicant has indicated that this area is being limited to two stories in height to City of Santa Clara Page 8 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023
accommodate the request of the adjacent property owner. The applicant considered townhouses the appropriate response for a two-story height. A greater building height could have facilitated this area to be integrated into the podium building at the front with a more conventional front door situation.

Alternatively, it could have been possible to integrate a two-story podium structure at this location as well, but the townhouses better utilize the property from a development standpoint. If the area proposed for townhouses were instead connected to the main podium structure, it could better conform to the City’s zoning code standards for setbacks and building access.

Commercial Frontage Setback
The mixed-use building is proposed with a front setback that varies from 4’ to 8’ from the property lines on Monroe and Franklin Streets. This setback, combined with the 10-foot sidewalk (public rightof-way), provides 14’-8” of area adjacent to the ground floor commercial space for spillover of potential associated outdoor commercial uses such as outdoor seating for restaurants. The townhomes do not have street frontage and are tucked behind the single-family house and mixeduse building. The City’s Zoning Code includes a standard for such outdoor commercial use areas along a project frontage within the TMU district. The TMU district requires a 10-foot building setback with a city standard sidewalk of 10 feet so that there is a total of at least 20 feet of setback for potential associated outdoor commercial uses. It is thus generally considered necessary to provide a larger setback to insure adequate space for both pedestrians and commercial use of the zone between a commercial building frontage and the public street.

The draft Downtown Precise Plan/Form Based Zoning Code would require an 8’-12’ building setback on Monroe with an 11 foot sidewalk and a 0’-5’ building setback on Franklin with a 20 foot sidewalk, thereby providing 19 feet on Monroe and 20 feet on Franklin for potential associated outdoor commercial uses, similar to what is required in the TMU district. The proposed project would therefore not provide a sufficient setback under the proposed Precise Plan.

Townhouse Setbacks
The four townhomes are proposed to have a setback from the rear property line of 10 feet adjacent to the adjacent single-family residences. The mixed-use building also has a 10-foot rear setback and is located adjacent to commercial uses. The TMU Zoning District requires a rear setback of 20 feet for this type of interface.

For Reference, the draft Downtown Precise Plan/Form Based Zoning Code would, however, require only a 10-foot rear setback, as proposed in the project.

Building Height
The proposed development would include a six-story structure (73 feet at the roof, 84 feet to top of stair well and parapet) tapering down to three-stories (38 feet) adjacent to the listed HRI properties, and four two-story (24 feet) townhouses immediately adjacent to single-family neighbors to the west.

The TMU Zoning District has a maximum building height of 50 feet.

For reference, the draft Downtown Precise Plan/Form Based Zoning Code allows 2-4 stories (28-59 feet) and with community benefits a “bonus” height of 3-5 stories (40-72 feet). Development is only permitted at the bonus height level when the project includes community benefits identified in the draft Precise Plan. In the draft Precise Plan, conservation of resources listed on the Historic Resources Inventory and buildings in the Historic Combining Zoning District are a community benefit and qualify for the bonus height. However, at 73 feet, the proposed height of the project would City of Santa Clara Page 9 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023
exceed the maximum height in the proposed Precise Plan even with the bonus for community benefits.

Ground Floor Design
Downtown Focus Area Policy 5.4.2-P1 states, “Establish Downtown as a destination, with a mix of entertainment and cultural activities, eating and drinking establishments, local ‐
serving office and
commercial uses, residential development, and public spaces.” In keeping with the mixed-use character for the proposed development, the project would provide 3,874 square feet of ground floor commercial space that wraps the corner of Monroe and Franklin Streets. Demand for retail space in general, and in particular for mixed-use buildings, is a sensitive issue that needs to be carefully considered and good design is generally vital to the future success of such spaces to provide the best possible opportunity for future tenants to thrive and contribute to the urban vitality of the Downtown.

The placement of interior stairs interrupting the ground floor commercial space potentially limits its usability. Further, the location of back of house areas (e.g., kitchen facilities, restrooms) will further diminish the amount and flexibility of usable commercial space. The applicant has indicated that they have an identified tenant for one portion of the commercial space fronting Franklin Street and that given the visibility and outdoor amenity area for the portions fronting Monroe Street, do not anticipate any difficulty with filling this space.

Parking
The proposed amount of residential parking (81 parking spaces for 54 residential units) results in a parking ratio of one space for every one-bedroom unit and 1.5 spaces for every two-bedroom unit, consistent with the standard for mixed-use development in the Zoning Code. The proposed commercial parking (13 commercial spaces) is consistent with the 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of area standard for mixed-use development in the Zoning Code.

Historic Resources
The project proposal includes a rezoning of two HRI listed properties and staff therefore recommends that historic preservation standards be included within the Planned Development Zoning to regulate future use of these structures consistent with their current treatment in the Historic Combining (HT) district. The applicant has indicated a willingness to defer to the direction of the Planning Commission. Staff thus recommends adding the following provisions of the HT District to the PD Zoning that would be applicable to both HRI properties, to address use and maintenance of those structures.
· 18.58.050 Conversion of residential structures to commercial use. · 18.58.060 Architectural control.
· 18.58.070 Demolition restriction.

In addition, as discussed above, the Project Site includes property that currently has a Historic Combining (HT) zoning designation. SCCC Section 18.58.030 provides for the review and input of the Historical and Landmarks Commission (HLC) prior to rezoning an HT property, and on June 29, 2023, the HLC conducted a duly noticed public meeting to consider the proposal. The HLC’s recommendation on the proposal is included this staff report for Planning Commission consideration. At the June 29 meeting, the HLC voted 4-0 to forward the EIR to the Planning Commission with no recommendation, voted 4-0 to recommend denial of the rezoning and Vesting City of Santa Clara Page 10 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023
Tentative Subdivision Map, voted 4-0 to recommend denial of the Architectural Review of the project design, and 4-0 to recommend approval of the Minor Significant Property Alteration, subject to conditions. The factors cited by the HLC included the impact of the six-story component on the ebb and flow of Monroe Street and proximity of the two-story townhomes to adjacent single-family properties.

Subdivision Ordinance
The project includes a Tentative Map to subdivide the property to implement the proposed land uses. The proposed Map would subdivide three existing parcels into two single-family parcels and one mixed-use parcel with 50 condominium units, four townhouses, one detached single-family dwelling unit, one condominium unit for all common floor common area, two condominium units of basement parking, and three retail condominium units (See Attachment 10). The lot lines of the two historical lots at 906 and 930 Monroe would be moved so as to reduce them in size, but will remain as two separate single-family parcels. The residential structure at 1341 Homestead Road would be combined with the new mixed-use parcel to create access for the new townhouses.

The reduction in parcel sizes for 906 and 930 Monroe Street would require a rezoning to Planned Development (PD), which is proposed to create substandard single-family lot sizes as defined in the Zoning Code. The current standards and proposed rezoning standards are summarized below. 906 Monroe Street
- Currently zoned HT - Historical Combining Zoning District - Rezone to PD for reduced lot size for single-family lot - 1341 Homestead Road residential structure will be excluded from the proposed parcel 930 Monroe Street
- Currently zoned OG - General Office Zoning District
- Rezone to PD for reduced lot size for single-family lot 940-950 Monroe Street
- Currently zoned Community Commercial
- Rezone to PD for development standards as proposed in the development plan - 1341 Homestead Road will be combined with the new mixed-use parcel and be rezoned to PD
Subdivision Map applications are reviewed for General Plan and Zoning Code consistency, and conformance with the Subdivision Map Act. The proposed Tentative Map application was reviewed by the City’s Subdivision Clearance Committee and determined to be complete. With approval of the General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Rezoning the proposed subdivision will not result in any inconsistencies with the General Plan or zoning designation for the property.

Conditions of Approval have been prepared and are provided as Attachment 8.

Conclusion
The proposed project would provide a residential mixed-use project in the Downtown Focus Area with 50 new condominium units, ground floor commercial, and four new townhouses while preserving three single-family homes, including two historic structures. The proposed project is consistent with several General Plan policies. While not consistent with the height and scale prescribed in the City of Santa Clara Page 11 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023
Downtown Focus Area policies, and not fully consistent with the General Plan Transition policies, the project has gone through revisions to lower height in proximity to existing lower intensity uses, and has been designed to better address the issues of land use transition and interface while still achieving increased residential density on the site. With the proposed Amendment, these General Plan policies would be modified so that the project can be found to be consistent. Additionally, to address use and maintenance of the HRI structures, staff recommends adding a condition to include provisions of the HT Zoning District (Sections 18.58.050,18.58.060, and 18.58.070) that would be applicable to both HRI properties, as a part of the PD zone.

Based upon the analysis, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the requested actions with added historic conditions to the Planned Development Zoning.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the project by the environmental consultant firm David J. Powers & Associates, Inc., in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The EIR and Notice of Availability were posted on the City’s website at <https://www.santaclaraca.gov/our-city/departments-a-f/community-development/planningdivision/environmental-review-ceqa> and circulated for 45-day review on October 14, 2022 to November 30, 2022, in accordance with CEQA requirements. During the review period, the Community Development Department received agency comments on the EIR from Valley Water, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, and the Department of Toxic Substances Control, which are provided in this report, along with responses to comments for review.

The EIR identified potential environmental impacts associated with project development and identified air quality, biological, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, and noise impacts that with incorporation of mitigation measures into the project would reduce all potential impacts to less than significant. A detailed discussion of the potential impacts and mitigation measures to be applied to the project are specified in the EIR and would be implemented through project conditions of approval and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the proposed project.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City for processing the requested application other than administrative time and expense typically covered by processing fees paid by the applicant.

COORDINATION
This report has been coordinated with the City Attorney’s Office.

PUBLIC CONTACT
On May 11, 2023, a notice of public hearing of this item was posted in three conspicuous locations within 300 feet of the project site. A notice of public hearing was also published in the Weekly, a newspaper of general circulation in the City, on May 10, 2023, for the May 24, 2023 Planning Commission meeting (which was subsequently continued to June 14 and then July 13, 2023). The Planning Department has received comments on the project and are attached to this report for review.

Community Meetings
A virtual public outreach meeting was conducted by Salvatore Caruso (applicant) on December 1, City of Santa Clara Page 12 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023
2020 to engage the neighborhood community in the planning process. Notices of the meeting were mailed by the applicant to property owners within 1,000 feet of the project boundaries and interested parties and was also posted on the City’s website. The applicant also presented the project at a meeting of the Downtown Precise Plan Task Force on January 21, 2021. These meetings provided the community the opportunity to convey their concerns to the applicant regarding the type and density of housing proposed for the site, building height, landscaping, traffic safety, commercial vacancy, and preservation of historic resources.

At their January 21, 2021 meeting, the Downtown Community Task Force voted 9 - 0 to write a letter to the Historical and Landmarks Commission, Planning Commission, and the City Council to transmit their comments on the project (Attachment 9). The specific concern raised by the Task Force is that the development does not consider the Downtown Precise Plan, Form Based Code, or even the current General Plan. The applicant had made significant changes prior to the Task Force meeting based upon community feedback at the December 1, 2020 meeting, which included keeping the single-family residence at 1341 Homestead Road and changing a four-story portion of the residential building to two-story townhomes on the west side.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Adopt a resolution to recommend the City Council adopt the Environmental Impact Report and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 950 Monroe Street Project.

2. Adopt a resolution to recommend the City Council approve a General Plan Amendment to modify the text for the Community Mixed Use land use designation and related policies

3. Adopt a resolution to recommend the City Council approve a Rezone from General Office (OG), Historic Combining (HT), and Community Commercial (CC) to Planned Development (PD) to allow a six-story mixed-use development with 50 units, four townhomes, and three single-family residences with on-site parking and amenities, landscaping, and off-site improvements with provisions of the HT Zoning District (Sections 18.58.050,18.58.060, and

18.58.070) that would be applicable to both HRI properties.

4. Recommend the City Council approve a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.

5. Recommend the City Council deny a General Plan Amendment to modify the text for the Community Mixed Use land use designation and related policies.

6. Recommend the City Council deny a rezone from General Office (OG), Historic Combining (HT), and Community Commercial (CC) to Planned Development (PD) to allow a six-story mixed-use development with 50 units, four townhomes, and three single-family residences with on-site parking and amenities, landscaping, and off-site improvements.

7. Recommend the City Council deny a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Adopt a resolution to recommend the City Council adopt the Environmental Impact Report and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 950 Monroe Street Project.

2. Recommend the City Council approve a General Plan Amendment to modify the text for the Community Mixed Use land use designation and related policies.

3. Recommend the City Council approve a rezone from General Office (OG), Historic Combining (HT), and Community Commercial (CC) to Planned Development (PD) to allow a six-story mixed-use development with 50 units, four townhomes, and three single-family residences with on-site parking and amenities, landscaping, and off-site improvements, with added standards for the two HIR properties with provisions of the HT Zoning District (Sections City of Santa Clara Page 13 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
23-354 Agenda Date: 7/13/2023

18.58.050,18.58.060, and 18.58.070) that would be applicable to both HRI properties.

4. Recommend City Council approval of a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.

Prepared by: Steve Le, Senior Planner
Reviewed by: Alexander Abbe, Assistant City Attorney
Approved by: Lesley Xavier, Planning Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

2. Final Environmental Impact Report

3. Resolution Recommending Council Certify the Environmental Impact Report, Make CEQA Findings, and Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

4. CEQA Findings

5. Resolution Recommending Council Approve the General Plan Amendment

6. Resolution Recommending the Council Approve the Rezone

7. Resolution Recommending the Council Approve the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map

8. Conditions of Approval for Rezoning

9. Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map

10. Public Correspondence

11. Development Plans

12. General Plan Downtown Focus Area Map (Figure 5.4-3) City of Santa Clara Page 14 of 14 Printed on 7/7/2023
powered by Legistar™
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 1 City of Santa Clara DRAFT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project

CITY OF SANTA CLARA
February 14, 2023
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 2 City of Santa Clara

P R E F A C E
Section 21081 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a Lead Agency to adopt a Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program whenever it approves a project for which measures have been required to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The purpose of the monitoring or reporting program is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation.

On _____, the City Council approved the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the 950 Monroe Avenue Mixed Use Project. The EIR concluded that the implementation of the project could result in significant effects on the environment and mitigation measures were incorporated into the proposed project or are required as a condition of project approval. This Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program addresses those measures in terms of how and when they will be implemented.

This document does not discuss those subjects for which the EIR concluded that mitigation measures would not be required to reduce significant impacts. 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 1 City of Santa Clara

Construction of the
proposed development
project would generate
fugitive dust in the
form of PM2.5 and PM10
resulting from
disturbed soils at the
construction site.

MM-AIR-3.1: The proposed development project will
implement the following BAAQMD Recommended Measures
to Control Particulate Matter Emissions during all phases of construction.

1. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered at a frequency adequate to maintain
minimum soil moisture of 12 percent (i.e., three times a day). Moisture content can be verified by lab samples
or moisture probe.

2. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered.

3. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street
sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power
sweeping is prohibited.

4. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph.

5. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved
shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads
shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless
seeding or soil binders are used.

6. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting
equipment off when not in use or reducing the
maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by
the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations
During all phases
of Construction
Project applicant Director of
Community
Development or
the Director’s
designee
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 2 City of Santa Clara

7. All construction equipment shall be maintained and
properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s
specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a
certified mechanic and determined to be running in
proper condition prior to operation.

8. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding
dust complaints. This person shall resp ond and take
corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s
phone number shall also be visible to ensure
compliance with applicable regulations.

9. All excavation, grading, and/or demolition activities shall be suspended when average wind speeds exceed
20 mph and visible dust extends beyond site
boundaries.

10. Wind breaks (e.g., trees, fences) shall be installed on the windward side(s) of actively disturbed areas of
construction adjacent to sensitive receptors. Wind
breaks should have at maximum 50 percent air porosity.

11. Vegetative ground cover (e.g., fast-germinating native grass seed) shall be planted in disturbed areas as soon as possible and watered appropriately until vegetation is established.

12. The simultaneous occurrence of excavation, grading, and ground disturbing construction activities on the
same area at any one time shall be limited. Activities
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 3 City of Santa Clara

13. Avoid tracking of visible soil material on to public roadways by employing the following measures if
necessary:
a. Site accesses to a distance of 100 feet from
public paved roads shall be treated with a six to
12-inch compacted layer of wood chips, mulch,
or gravel and
b. washing truck tires and construction equipment
of prior to leaving the site. Sandbags or other
erosion control measures shall be installed to
prevent silt runoff to public roadways from sites
with a slope greater than one percent.

Impact AIR-3.2:

Construction of the
proposed development
project would result in
nearby sensitive
receptors being
exposed to toxic air
contaminant emissions
in excess of BAAQMD
threshold for cancer
risk and annual PM2.5.

MM-AIR-3.2: Prior to the issuance of any demolition, grading, or building permits (whichever occurs earliest), the project applicant shall submit a construction operations plan to the Director of Community Development or the Director’s
designee that includes specifications of the equipment to be used during construction. The plan shall be accompanied by a letter signed by an air quality specialist, verifying that the equipment included in the plan meets the standards set forth below. All diesel-powered off-road equipment (larger than 25 horsepower) operating on-site for more than two days
continuously (or 20 hours total) shall, at a minimum, meet U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Tier 4 emission
standards for particulate matter.

Prior to the
issuance of any
demolition,
grading, or
building permits
(whichever
occurs earliest)
Project applicant Director of
Community
Development or
the Director’s
designee
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 4 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
950 MONROE STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
• If Tier 4 equipment is not available, all construction equipment larger than 25 horsepower used at the site for more than two continuous days or 20 hours total shall
meet U.S. EPA emission standards for Tier 3 engines
and include particulate matter emissions control
equivalent to CARB Level 3 verifiable diesel emission
control devices that altogether achieves a 60 percent
reduction in particulate matter exhaust.
• Provide line power to the site to minimize the use of diesel-powered stationary equipment, such as
generators.

Biology
Impact BIO-1.1:

Project construction
could impact nesting
birds on or adjacent to
the site, if present.

MM BIO-1.1: Construction shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season to the extent feasible. The nesting season for most birds, including most raptors, in the San Francisco Bay area extends from February 1 through August 31.

If it is not possible to schedule construction and tree removal between September and January, then pre-construction surveys for nesting birds shall be completed by a qualified ornithologist to ensure that no nests shall be disturbed during project implementation. This survey shall be completed no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of grading, tree removal, or other demolition or construction activities during the early part of the breeding season (February through April) and no more than 30 days prior to the initiation of these activities during the late part of the breeding season (May through August).

No more than 14
days prior to the
initiation of
grading, tree
removal, or other
demolition or
construction
activities during
the early part of
the breeding
season (February
through April)
and no more than
30 days prior to
Project applicant
and
Qualified
ornithologist
Director of
Community
Development or
the Director’s
designee
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 5 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
950 MONROE STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
During this survey, the ornithologist shall inspect all tress and other possible nesting habitats within and immediately adjacent to the construction area of nests. If an active nest is found sufficiently close to work areas to be disturbed by construction, the ornithologist, in consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), shall determine the extent of a construction free buffer zone to be established around the nest to ensure that nests of bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Agreement (MBTA) or Fish and Game Code shall not be disturbed during project construction.
the initiation of
these activities
during the late
part of the
breeding season
(May through
August)
Impact BIO-5.1: The
proposed development
project would not
comply with the City’s
tree protection policy
MM-BIO-5.1: The project applicant will coordinate with the supervising planner to identify locations off-site for
replacement trees in addition to the trees proposed as part of the landscaping on-site in accordance with General Plan Policy

5.3.1-P10. This will require the planting of 13, 24-inch box trees off-site to fully offset the removal of trees on-site.

The project applicant will provide the supervising planner with appropriate documentation to confirm that all on- and off-site replacement trees have been planted prior to issuance of occupancy permits.

Prior to issuance
of occupancy
permits.

Project applicant Supervising
Planner
Cultural Resources
Impact CUL-2.1
Construction of the
proposed development
project could require
MM CUL-2.1: Prior to the commencement of any grounddisturbing activity on the project site, the project applicant shall retain a registered professional archaeologist, to be present Prior to the
commencement
of any grounddisturbing
Project
applicant, and
Registered
Director of
Community
Development or
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 6 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
950 MONROE STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
excavation in an area
which has moderate to
high sensitivity for
archeological resources
and could disturb
unrecorded
archaeological
resources.
during all ground-disturbing activity associated with the project.
a. A registered professional archaeologist shall be given five days’ written notice prior to the start of any
ground-disturbing activity as defined in subsection c.
below. The project applicant shall document receipt of
notification in writing.
b. The registered professional archaeologist shall be
present during construction phases that involve grounddisturbing activities. For the purposes of these conditions, ground-disturbing activities shall be defined as any ground disturbance, including but not limited to, excavation, grading, grubbing, scarring, drilling,
scraping, blading, trenching, vegetation removal, or
demolition of existing structures or site improvements
within the development area shown on the project
plans.
c. Upon discovery of any archaeological resources and
tribal cultural resources (TCRs), all ground-disturbing and construction activities within 50 feet of discovery shall cease on the project site until the find can be
assessed to the satisfaction of the registered
professional archaeologist. All archaeological resources and TCRs unearthed by project activities shall be
evaluated by a registered professional archaeologist and tribal monitor or other tribal representatives.
activity on the
project site
professional
archaeologist
the Director’s
designee
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 7 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
950 MONROE STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
MM CUL-2.2: The project applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist, as needed, to be present during all grounddisturbing activity associated with the project.

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
950 MONROE STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
resulting from execution of a treatment plan. The
disposition of TCR artifacts shall include, but not be
limited to, reburying in close proximity of the finds
without scientific study, allowing scientific study before reburying the materials either near the origin of the find or in another protected place, or temporary curation at a facility at an institution that meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s criteria for curation (36 CFR 79) prior to reburial. Disposition of any TCR artifacts shall be
subject to approval by the culturally affiliated tribe. All curation fees and related expenses shall be paid by the project applicant.
d. To ensure adequate space and protection are provided for reburial of any TCRs discovered on the project site, the Permittee shall designate a cultural easement area.

The easement area shall be in a location that will not be subject to future disturbance and that will not require the relocation of buildings or other physical
improvements on the site.
e. The registered professional archaeologist shall file State of California Department of Parks and Recreation
(DPR) Series 523 forms for the cultural easement/TCR
reburial location (if used) with the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) Center in
accordance with the guidelines established by the
California Office of Historic Preservation. The DPR
Series 523 forms shall establish a permanent record of
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 9 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
950 MONROE STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
the cultural easement location and any TCRs discovered
on the project site for future site identification and
protection. The registered professional archeologist
shall also file a Sacred Lands File record with the
NAHC on behalf of the culturally affiliated tribe
Impact CUL-3.1 The
proposed development
project could result in
the discovery
disturbance of human
remains during
excavation of the
project site.

MM CUL-3.1: In the event that human remains are discovered during excavation and/or grading of the site, all activity within a 50-foot radius of the find shall be stopped. The Santa Clara County Coroner shall be notified and shall make a
determination as to whether the remains are of Native
American origin or whether an investigation into the cause of death is required. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the Coroner shall notify the Native American
Heritage Commission (NAHC) immediately. Once NAHC
identifies the most likely descendants, the descendants will make recommendations regarding proper burial, which will be implemented in accordance with Section 15064.5(e) of the CEQA Guidelines.

In the event that
human remains
are discovered
during
excavation
and/or grading
of the site
Project
Applicant
Santa Clara
County Coroner,
Native American
Heritage
Commission
(NAHC)
Geology and Soils
Impact GEO-1.1: The
project site is located
within a mapped
liquefaction hazard
zone. Buildings
constructed on-site
MM GEO-1.1: To avoid or minimize potential damage from
seismic shaking, the project would be built using standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques. Building redevelopment design and construction at the site shall be completed in conformance with the recommendations of a
design-level geotechnical investigation, which will be included As part of the
building permit
review and
issuance process
Project applicant
and contractors
City of Santa
Clara’s Building
Division
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 10 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
950 MONROE STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
could experience
settlement in the event
of strong ground
shaking as a result of
an earthquake.
in a report to the City. The report shall be reviewed and ap proved by the City of Santa Clara’s Building Division as part of the building permit review and issuance process. The building shall meet the requirements of applicable Building and Fire Codes, including the 2019 California Building Code, as adopted or updated by the City. The project shall be designed to withstand potential geologic hazards identified on the site and the project shall be designed to reduce the risk to life or property to the extent feasible and in compliance with the Building Code.

Impact GEO-2.1:

Construction activities
at the project site
would disturb soils onsite and could result in
sedimentation and
runoff on the project
site.

MM GEO-2.1: All excavation and grading work would be
scheduled in dry weather months or construction sites would be weatherized to withstand or avoid erosion.

MM GEO-2.2: Stockpiles and excavated soils would be
covered during construction with secured tarps or plastic sheeting.

MM GEO-2.3: Vegetation in disturbed areas would be
replanted as quickly as possible after construction.

During
excavation and
Grading
Project applicant
and Contractor
Director of
Community
Development or
the Director’s
designee
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Impact HAZ-1.1: The
surface and sub-surface
soils on-site could be
contaminated due to
MM HAZ-1.1: Prior to demolition and excavation of the
project site, a limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Phase II ESA) will be completed to determine if agricultural chemicals are present in the soil at the site. The site will be Prior to
demolition and
excavation
Project
Applicant
Santa Clara Fire
Department
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 11 City of Santa Clara

Implementation of the
project could expose
construction workers
and adjacent land uses
to residual agricultural
soil contamination.
sampled for CAM 17 Metals, pesticides, TPH-G, BTEX, and 5- Oxygenates. Phase II ESA sampling activities shall be
coordinated with the Santa Clara Fire Department.

MM HAZ-1.2: Following demolition and removal of
pavement, soil samples will be gathered from the site and sent for laboratory analyses to evaluate appropriate disposal alternatives. The analyses would include but not be limited to organochlorine pesticides, lead, petroleum hydrocarbons, and other metals. Sampling will occur prior to the issuance of grading permits.

Contaminated soil shall be handled separately from “clean” soil. Common and potentially applicable remedial measures for the impacted soil may include: 1) excavation and off-site disposal at a permitted facility; 2) the use of engineering and administrative controls, such as consolidation and capping of the soil on-site and land use covenants restricting certain activities/uses; and 3) a combination of the above. Remedial activities at the site, if warranted, will be overseen by an Following
demolition and
removal of
pavement
In the event that
impacted soil is
found on-site
Project
Applicant
Project
Applicant
Director of
Community
Development or
the Director’s
designee
Director of
Community
Development or
the Director’s
designee
Santa Clara
County
Department of
Environmental
Health
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 12 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
950 MONROE STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
appropriate regulatory agency, such as the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) or the Santa Clara County
Department of Environmental Health (SCCDEH).

Noise and Vibration
IMPACT-NOI-1.1:

Operation of the
proposed development
project could result in
noise levels in excess
of City Code noise
level performance
standards.

MM-NOI-1.1 To reduce noise resulting from HVAC
equipment operations, one of the following measures shall be implemented:
• Equipment which would generate substantial noise shall be located at a minimum distance of 90 feet from the
nearest residential property lines and a minimum
distance of 25 feet from adjacent commercial property
lines.
• The selection of equipment shall be conducted and
approved by a qualified acoustical professional such
that equipment does not generate noise which would
exceed City Code standards at adjacent property lines.
• If distance and/or equipment selection is not sufficient to reduce equipment noise consistent with the City
Code, equipment shall be shielded by walls, such as by
a parapet wall constructed along the proposed
building’s roof line, such that the adjacent uses are not directly exposed to mechanical equipment noise. To
provide adequate noise reduction, walls will constructed to fully block the line of sight between the equipment
and the adjacent property line and shall have a
minimum surface weight of three pounds per square
foot (such as one-inch-thick wood, one-half-inch
Prior to
occupancy
Project
Applicant
City Code
Enforcement
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 13 City of Santa Clara

IMPACT-NOI-2.1
Construction of the
proposed development
project would result in
vibratory levels in
excess of established
guidelines and could
damage nearby
structures.

MM-NOI-2.1 The following measures are incorporated into the project to reduce vibration impacts from construction activities to a less than significant level:
• Prohibit impact or vibratory pile driving as a method of construction. As an alternative, construction of a mat
slab, shall be used.
• Limit the use of vibratory rollers, hoe rams, large
bulldozers, and caisson drilling, and avoid clam shovel drops within 20 feet of the property lines shared with
residences and commercial structures adjacent to the
site.
• Place operating equipment on the construction site as far as possible from vibration-sensitive receptors.
• Use smaller equipment to minimize vibration levels
below the limits.
• Select demolition methods not involving impact tools. • Avoid dropping heavy objects or materials near
vibration sensitive locations.
• A list of all heavy construction equipment to be used for this project known to produce high vibration levels (tracked vehicles, vibratory compaction, jackhammers,
hoe rams, etc.) shall be submitted to the City by the
contractor. This list shall be used to identify equipment and activities that would potentially generate substantial During
construction
Project applicant
and contractor
Director of
Community
Development or
the Director’s
designee
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 14 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
950 MONROE STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
vibration and to define the level of effort required for continuous vibration monitoring.
• A construction vibration-monitoring plan shall be
implemented to document conditions at the residences
and commercial structures adjacent to the site prior to, during, and after vibration generating construction
activities. All plan tasks shall be undertaken under the direction of a licensed Professional Structural Engineer in the State of California and be in accordance with
industry accepted standard methods. The construction
vibration monitoring plan should be implemented to
include the following tasks:
o Identification of sensitivity to ground-borne
vibration of the residences and commercial
structures adjacent to the site. A vibration
survey (generally described below) would need
to be performed.
o Performance of a photo survey, elevation
survey, and crack monitoring survey for the
residences and commercial structures nearest to
the site. Surveys shall be performed prior to and
after completion of vibration generating
construction activities located within 20 feet of
the structure. This distance shall be extended to
80 feet for vibratory pile driving and 120 feet
for impact pile driving. The surveys shall
include internal and external crack monitoring
in the structure, settlement, and distress, and
shall document the condition of the foundation,
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 15 City of Santa Clara

MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM
950 MONROE STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
Impacts Mitigation Timeframe for
Implementation
Responsibility
for
Implementation
Oversight of
Implementation
walls and other structural elements in the
interior and exterior of the structure.
o Conduct a post-survey on the structure where
either monitoring has indicated high levels or
complaints of damage. Make appropriate repairs
where damage has occurred as a result of
construction activities.
o The results of any vibration monitoring shall be
summarized and submitted in a report shortly
after substantial completion of each phase
identified in the project schedule. The report
will include a description of measurement
methods, equipment used, calibration
certificates, and graphics as required to clearly
identify vibration-monitoring locations. An
explanation of all events that exceeded vibration
limits will be included together with proper
documentation supporting any such claims.
o Designate a person responsible for registering
and investigating claims of excessive vibration.

The contact information of such person shall be
clearly posted on the construction site.
950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 16 City of Santa Clara In addition to mitigation measures listed above, there are also other conditions of approval the project shall implement, including the following:

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
950 MONROE STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
Asbestos and Lead Management Conditions
• In conformance with state and local laws, a visual inspection/pre-demolition survey, and possible sampling, shall be conducted prior to the demolition of on-site buildings to determine the presence of asbestos-containing materials and/or lead-based paint. • Prior to demolition activities, all building materials containing lead-based paint shall be removed in accordance with Cal/OSHA Lead in Construction Standard, Title 8, California Code of Regulations 1532.1, including employee training, employee air monitoring, and dust control. Any debris or soil containing lead-based paint or coatings would be disposed of at landfills that meet acceptance criteria for the waste being disposed.
• All potentially friable ACMs shall be removed in accordance with National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) guidelines prior to any building demolition or renovation that may disturb the materials. All demolition activities will be undertaken in accordance with Cal/OSHA standards contained in Title 8 of CCR, Section1529, to protect workers from exposure to asbestos. • A registered asbestos abatement contractor shall be retained to remove and dispose of ACMs identified in the asbestos survey performed for the site in accordance with the standards stated above. • Materials containing more than one percent asbestos are also subject to BAAQMD regulations. Removal of materials containing more than one percent asbestos shall be completed in accordance with BAAQMD requirements.

Best Management Practices: Construction Water Quality Impacts • Burlap bags filled with drain rock shall be installed around storm drains to route sediment and other debris away from the drains; • Earthmoving or other dust-producing activities would be suspended during period of high winds; • All exposed or disturbed soil surfaces would be watered at least twice daily to control dust as necessary; • Stockpiles of soil or other materials that can be blown by the wind would be watered or covered; • All trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials shall be covered; • All paved access roads, parking areas, staging areas and residential streets adjacent to the construction sites would be swept daily (with water sweepers); and
• Vegetation in disturbed areas would be replanted as quickly as possible. 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 17 City of Santa Clara

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
950 MONROE STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
Construction Best Management Practices - Noise
• Construction activities shall be limited to hours between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No construction is permitted on Sundays or holidays.
• Construct temporary noise barriers, where feasible, to screen stationary noise-generating equipment. Temporary noise barrier fences would provide a 5 dBA noise reduction if the noise barrier interrupts the line-of-sight between the noise source and receiver and if the barrier is constructed in a manner that eliminates any cracks or gaps. • Equip all internal combustion engine-driven equipment with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment.
• If geotechnical conditions allow, mat slab should be used in place of impact or vibratory pile driving. Mat slab would generate substantially less noise than impact -drive pile driving.
• Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines should be strictly prohibited. • Locate stationary noise-generating equipment, such as air compressors or portable power generators, as far as possible from sensitive receptors as feasible. If they must be located near receptors, adequate muffling (with enclosures where feasible and appropriate) shall be used reduce noise levels at the adjacent sensitive receptors. Any enclosure openings or venting shall face away from sensitive receptors. • Utilize "quiet" air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists. • Construction staging areas shall be established at locations that will create the greatest distance between the construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. • Control noise from construction workers’ radios to a point where they are not audible at existing residential uses to the north of the project site.
• The contractor shall prepare a detailed construction plan identifying the schedule for major noise-generating construction activities. The construction plan shall identify a procedure for coordination with adjacent residential land uses so that construction activities can be scheduled to minimize noise disturbance.
• Designate a "disturbance coordinator" who would be responsible for responding to any complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator will determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., bad muffler, etc.) and will require that reasonable measures be implemented to correct the problem. Conspicuously post a telephone number for the disturbance coordinator at the construction site and include in it the notice sent to neighbors regarding the construction schedule. 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project 18 City of Santa Clara

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
950 MONROE STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
Transportation Demand Management Plan
• Designated Transportation Coordinator
• Provide transportation information packets for new residents • “Online Kiosk”: online transportation information center • Bicycle parking and charging
• Biking Resources (maps and information)
• Pedestrian network Improvement
• On-Site Amenities
• On-site ride-matching assistance
• Rideshare resources
• Resident Surveys
• Driveway Counts
• Annual Reports
• Proximity to Transit
Sources: City of Santa Clara. Draft EIR for the 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project. September 2022. 950 Monroe Street Mixed-Use Project
Environmental Impact Report
and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
950 Monroe Street Mixed-Use Project | Environmental Review/CEQA | City of Santa Clara (santaclaraca.gov)
1 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS FOR THE 950 MONROE

STREET MIXED USE PROJECT
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of Santa Clara (City), as the Lead Agency under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., has prepared the Final Environmental Impact Report for the 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2021100581) (Final EIR or EIR”). The Final EIR is a project EIR pursuant to Section 15161 of the State Guidelines for implementation of the CEQA (CEQA Guidelines).1 The Final EIR consists of the September 2022 Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR), February 2023 Final Environmental Impact Report, and Late Comment Memos (May 16, 2023 and June 29, 2023). The EIR addresses the environmental effects associated with implementation of the project. The EIR is intended to serve as an informational document for public agency decision-makers and the general public regarding the objectives and components of the project. The EIR addresses the potential significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the project and identified feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to reduce or eliminate those impacts.

In determining to approve the 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project, which is described in more detail in Section II, the City Council certifies that the EIR reflects the City's own independent judgment and analysis under Public Resources Code Section 21082.1(a)-(c) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15090(a)(3). The City Council further makes and adopts the following findings of fact and adopts and incorporates into the project the mitigation measures identified in the EIR, all based on substantial evidence in the whole record of this proceeding (“administrative record”). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15090(a), the EIR was presented to the City Council of the City of Santa Clara, and the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR prior to making the findings provided in Sections IV to VIII, below. The conclusions presented in these findings are based upon the EIR and other evidence in the administrative record. The documents that constitute the administrative record on which the City Council's findings are based are located at the Planning Division office at City Hall, 1500 Warburton Avenue, Santa Clara, California. This information is presented in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(e).

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Location
The 0.87-acre project site is located at 906-950 Monroe Street and 1341 Homestead Road in the City of Santa Clara and consists of three parcels (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers [APNs] 269-20-095, -087, and -086). The site currently contains three single-family residences, and their associated outbuildings, and a 6,537 square foot commercial building. The parcels are zoned Historic Combining, General Office, and Community Commercial; and the site is designated as Community Mixed Use in the General Plan. Access to the site is provided by private driveways for the singlefamily residences on Homestead Road and Monroe Street, and parking lot access points for the commercial property along Monroe Street and Franklin Street.

1 The State CEQA Guidelines are found in California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq. 2 Project Overview
As proposed, the project would demolish the commercial building and residential outbuildings and construct a six-story, 72,000 square foot mixed-use building with 50 multi-family residential units and approximately 2,000 square feet of ground floor retail/restaurant space. Four detached two-story townhouses would also be constructed on-site. The existing residences fronting Monroe Street and Homestead Road would be retained in their current location. The project also proposes approximately 3,000 square feet of community amenities including an outdoor community area and gym for on-site residents. The mixed-use building, which would be located along Monroe Street, would be approximately 90 feet tall and would have one basement level for parking which would be accessed from Franklin Street. The townhouses, which would be located behind the mixed-use building and existing houses, would be approximately 26 feet tall. The mixed-use building would also feature two outdoor patios on the fourth and fifth floors on the south side of the building. The project proposes to rezone the site to PD – Planned Development.

Site Access and Parking
Parking for the proposed development project would be provided within the building on the ground floor and basement level of the mixed-use building. Access to the parking garage would be provided by a driveway and ramp on Franklin Street. The residential parking (including the townhouses) would include 100 parking spaces in automated stackers of which seven would be electric vehicle (EV) spaces. Parking for the retail and restaurant uses would include 10 parking spaces with one clean air/EV space.

Trip Demand Management Plan
The proposed project would be required to implement a Trip Demand Management Plan (TDM Plan) to comply with the Greenhouse Gas Climate Action Plan (CAP) for the City of Santa Clara. This TDM Plan can include any of the following items:
• Transit Incentivization Programs
• Commute Alternatives
• Carpools and Vanpools
• Bicycle Parking Options
• Bikeshare
• Shuttle Bus Service
• Improvement of Walking Conditions
• Parkin Reductions
General Plan Amendment
The proposed development project includes a General Plan Amendment to revise the specifications of the General Plan designation of Community Mixed Use. This change would allow for very high density housing (to a maximum of 70 units per acre) on mixed-use sites within the Downtown Precise Plan Area that meet the following criteria:
3 1) the property is located within 0.25 miles of a fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours;
2) the property is designated Community Mixed Use;
3) the development provides ground floor retail uses at the required FAR of 0.10; 4) if the project site is listed on the City’s Historic Preservation and Resource Inventory or the California Register of Historical Resources, any development affecting the historically significant structure shall be performed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties; and 5) the project provides for affordable housing through the payment of in-lieu fees and/or includes affordable units.

The previous land use designation provided up to 36 units per acre with a FAR of 0.10. The new General Plan designation would allow for an increase of approximately 34 units per acre. The 0.87 - acre site previously would have allowed up to 31 units, whereas up to 60 units would be permitted under the proposed General Plan Amendment. This would result in an increase in population and resource consumption higher than the levels analyzed in the General Plan Integrated FEIR.

The General Plan Amendment associated with the proposed development project would result in the revision of specific land uses in the Downtown Focus Precise Plan Area, totaling approximately 90 parcels and 12 acres of land within the downtown area. This would result in a potential increase of up to 408 dwelling units within the City of Santa Clara and approximately 1,064 residents compared to what was planned for in the General Plan. This would represent an approximately 14 percent increase in prospective residential development focused in the downtown area of Santa Clara.

Project Objectives
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15124, the EIR must identify the objectives sought by the proposed development project. The applicant’s objectives for the project are as follows:

1. Develop the site into an economically viable, mixed-use project with up to 50 residential units along with up to four townhomes to provide a distinct mix and variety of unit types to serve a broad population that will help address the City’s housing needs.

2. Establish intergenerational physical and social connections through the provision of a varied mix of housing types and amenities that support community vitality in accordance with the City’s General Plan.

3. Preserve two historic single-family residences and one non-historic single-family residence on-site to strengthen the cultural and historical connection of the project to the neighborhood.

4. Create and maintain a residential built environment that promotes the safety and well-being of its residents and the surrounding community.

5. Create a residential transit-oriented project balanced with community-serving amenities that connects to and enhances the City’s bike and pedestrian network, while reducing vehicle trips.

6. Promote sustainability by developing a residential project on an infill and easily accessible project site through the incorporation of environmentally responsible construction techniques and conservation of energy in accordance with the major strategies of the City’s General Plan.
4 III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS
In accordance with Section 15082 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City prepared a Notice of Preparation (“NOP”) of an EIR for the 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project. The NOP was sent to state and local responsible and trustee agencies and federal agencies on October 26, 2021. The 30- day comment period concluded on November 25, 2021. The NOP provided a description of the project and identified probable environmental effects that could result from implementation of the project. The City also held a public scoping meeting on November 8, 2021, during the NOP comment period to discuss the project and solicit public input as to the scope and content of the EIR. The meeting was held over Zoom due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The City prepared the Draft EIR for the 950 Monroe Mixed Use project in compliance with the CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. The Draft EIR was circulated for public review and comment for 45 days from October 26, 2022 through December 5, 2022. During this period, the Draft EIR was available to the public and local, state, and federal agencies for review and comment. Notice of the Availability and completion of the Draft EIR was sent directly to every agency, person, and organization that commented on the NOP, as well as to the Office of Planning and Research. Written comments from public agencies, organizations, and individuals concerning the environmental review contained in the Draft EIR were sent to the City during the 45-day public review period on the Draft EIR.

Following the conclusion of the 45-day public review period on the Draft EIR, the City prepared a Final EIR in conformance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15132. The Final EIR includes responses to comments received by the City on the Draft EIR and any necessary text revisions to the Draft EIR.

These revisions do not require recirculation of the EIR because none of the revisions constitute “significant new information” pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 in as much as these changes would not result in a new environmental impact and would not cause a substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact; and the project sponsor would adopt the mitigation measures. Responses to public agency comments on the EIR were sent to the commenting agencies on October 14, 2022.

On DATE, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council certify the Final EIR.

IV. FINDINGS
These findings summarize the environmental determinations of the EIR about project impacts before and after mitigation, and do not attempt to repeat the full analysis of each environmental impact contained in the EIR. Instead, these findings provide a summary description of and basis for each impact in the EIR, describe the applicable mitigation measures identified in the EIR, and state the City’s findings and rationale therefore on the significance of each impact with the adopted mitigation measures. A full explanation of these environmental findings and conclusions can be found in the EIR, and these findings hereby incorporate by reference the discussion and analysis in the EIR supporting the EIR’s determinations regarding mitigation measures and the project’s impacts. 5 In adopting the mitigation measures outlined below, the City intends to adopt each of the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR. Accordingly, in the event a mitigation measure identified in the Final EIR has been inadvertently omitted from these findings, such mitigation measure is hereby referred to, adopted, and incorporated in the findings below by reference. In addition, in the event the language of a mitigation measure set forth below fails to accurately reflect the mitigation measure in the Final EIR due to a clerical error, the language of the mitigation measure as set forth in the Final EIR shall control unless the language of the mitigation measure has been specifically and expressly modified by these findings.

Sections V through VII, below, provide brief descriptions of the impacts the Final EIR identified as less than significant with adopted mitigation. No impacts in the Final EIR were found to be Significant and Unavoidable. These descriptions also reproduce the full text of the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR for each significant impact.

V. SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN THE FINAL EIR THAT ARE

REDUCED TO A LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVEL BY MITIGATION

MEASURES ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT
The City Council, having reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR, hereby finds, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that the following potentially significant impacts will be reduced below a level of significance with implementation of the identified mitigation measures. These findings are based on Section 3.0 of the Draft EIR, the discussion and analysis of which are hereby incorporated in full by this reference.

Air Quality
Impact AIR-3.1: Construction of the proposed development project would generate fugitive dust in the form of PM2.5 and PM10 resulting from disturbed soils at the construction site.

Findings AIR-3.1: Changes or alterations, which have been incorporated into the project, will reduce the severity of the significant air quality impact. Specifically, implementation of MM AIR-3.1, set forth below, which is hereby adopted and incorporated into the project, would reduce construction emissions to a less than significant level by controlling dust and exhaust, limiting exposed soil surfaces, and reducing respirable particulate matter (PM 2.5 and PM10) exhaust emissions from construction equipment.

MM AIR-3.1: During any construction period ground disturbance, the applicant shall ensure that the project contractor implements the following BAAQMD BMPs: The proposed development project will implement the following BAAQMD-Recommended Measures to Control Particulate Matter Emissions during all phases of construction.
1) All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered at a frequency adequate to maintain minimum soil moisture of 12 percent (i.e., three times a day).

Moisture content can be verified by lab samples or moisture probe. 6 2) All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered.
3) All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.
4) All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. 5) All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
6) Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.
7) All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation.
8) Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 9) All excavation, grading, and/or demolition activities shall be suspended when average wind speeds exceed 20 mph and visible dust extends beyond site boundaries.
10) Wind breaks (e.g., trees, fences) shall be installed on the windward side(s) of actively disturbed areas of construction adjacent to sensitive receptors. Wind breaks should have at maximum 50 percent air porosity.
11) Vegetative ground cover (e.g., fast germinating native grass seed) shall be planted in disturbed areas as soon as possible and watered appropriately until vegetation is established.
12) The simultaneous occurrence of excavation, grading, and ground disturbing construction activities on the same area at any one time shall belimited.

Activities shall be phased to reduce the amount of disturbed surfaces at any one time.
13) Avoid tracking of visible soil material on to public roadways by employing the following measures if necessary:
a) Site accesses to a distance of 100 feet from public paved roads shall be treated with a six to 12-inch compacted layer of wood chips, mulch, or gravel and
b) washing truck tires and construction equipment of prior to leaving the site. Sandbags or other erosion control measures shall be installed to prevent silt runoff to public roadways from sites with a slope greater than one percent.
7 Impact AIR-3.2: Construction of the proposed development project would result in nearby sensitive receptors being exposed to toxic air contaminant emissions in excess of BAAQMD threshold for cancer risk and annual PM2.5.

Findings AIR-3.2: Changes or alterations, which have been incorporated into the project, will reduce the severity of the significant air quality impact. Specifically, implementation of MM AIR-3.2, set forth below, which is hereby adopted and incorporated into the project, would reduce toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions to a less than significant level by reducing cancer risk and annual PM2.5 emissions below the annual thresholds for construction emissions.

MM AIR-3.2: Prior to the issuance of any demolition, grading, or building permits (whichever occurs earliest), the project applicant shall submit a construction-operations plan to the Director of Community Development or the Director’s designee that includes specifications of the equipment to be used during construction. The plan shall be accompanied by a letter signed by an air quality specialist, verifying that the equipment included in the plan meets the standards set forth below. All diesel-powered off-road equipment (larger than 25 horsepower) operating on-site for more than two days continuously (or 20 hours total) shall, at a minimum, meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Tier 4 emission standards for particulate matter.
 If Tier 4 equipment is not available, all construction equipment larger than 25 horsepower used at the site for more than two continuous days or 20 hours total shall meet U.S. EPA emission standards for Tier 3 engines and include particulate matter emissions control equivalent to CARB Level 3 verifiable diesel emission control devices that altogether achieves a 60 percent reduction in particulate matter exhaust.
 Provide line power to the site to minimize the use of diesel-powered stationary equipment, such as generators.

Biological Resources
Impact BIO-5.1: The proposed development project would not comply with the City’s tree protection policy.

Findings BIO-5.1: Changes or alterations, which have been incorporated into the project, will reduce the severity of the significant biological resource impact. Specifically, implementation of MM BIO-5.1, set forth below, which is hereby adopted and incorporated into the project, would reduce biological resource impacts to a less than significant level by ensuring trees removed from the project site are replaced in accordance with City General Plan Policy 5.3.1-P10. 8 MM BIO-5.1: The project applicant will coordinate with the supervising planner to identify locations off-site for replacement trees in addition to the trees proposed as part of the landscaping on-site in accordance with General Plan Policy 5.3.1-P10. This will require the planting of 13, 24-inch box trees off-site to fully offset the removal of trees on-site.

Cultural Resources
Impact CUL-2.1: Construction of the proposed development project could require excavation in an area which has moderate to high sensitivity for archeological resources and could disturb unrecorded archaeological resources.

Findings CUL-2.1: Changes or alterations, which have been incorporated into the project, will reduce the severity of the significant cultural resource impact. Specifically, implementation of MM CUL-2.1 through -2.3, set forth below, which are hereby adopted and incorporated into the project, would avoid and/or reduce significant impacts to unknown buried archaeological resources to a less than significant level by completing a presence/absence exploration and/or monitoring excavation activities and identifying the procedures necessary to protect resources if found.

MM CUL-2.1: Prior to the commencement of any ground-disturbing activity on the project site, the project applicant shall retain a registered professional archaeologist, to be present during all ground-disturbing activity associated with the project. a. A registered professional archaeologist shall be given five days’ written notice prior to the start of any ground disturbing activity as defined in subsection c. below. The project applicant shall document receipt of notification in writing.
b. The registered professional archaeologist shall be present during construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. For the purposes of these conditions, ground-disturbing activities shall be defined as any ground disturbance, including but not limited to, excavation, grading, grubbing, scarring, drilling, scraping, blading, trenching, vegetation removal, or demolition of existing structures or site improvements within the development area shown on the project plans.
c. Upon discovery of any archaeological resources and tribal cultural resources (TCRs), all ground-disturbing and construction activities within 50 feet of discovery shall cease on the project site until the find can be assessed to the satisfaction of the registered professional archaeologist. All archaeological resources and TCRs unearthed by project activities shall be evaluated by a registered professional archaeologist and tribal monitor or other tribal representatives.
9 MM CUL-2.2: The project applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist, as needed, to be present during all ground-disturbing activity associated with the project.

MM CUL-2.3: In the event that archaeological resources or TCRs are discovered on the project site and cannot be avoided, a detailed archaeological treatment plan shall be implemented.
a. The treatment plan shall be developed by the on-call professional archaeologist to determine the most appropriate treatment measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate any potential impacts. This shall include documentation of the resources and may include data recovery or other measures. b. Any treatment other than preservation in place must be approved by the City of Santa Clara. Treatment for most resources would consist of (but would not be limited to) sample excavation, artifact collection, site documentation, and historical research, with the aim to target the recovery of important scientific data contained in resource.
c. The culturally affiliated tribe(s) who consulted on the project, or if no consultation occurred the tribe identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), shall determine the disposition of any TCR artifacts discovered during on-site excavation or construction activities or TCR artifacts resulting from execution of a treatment plan. The disposition of TCR artifacts shall include, but not be limited to, reburying in close proximity of the finds without scientific study, allowing scientific study before reburying the materials either near the origin of the find or in another protected place, or temporary curation at a facility at an institution that meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s criteria for curation (36 CFR 79) prior to reburial. Disposition of any TCR artifacts shall be subject to approval by the culturally affiliated tribe. All curation fees and related expenses shall be paid by the project applicant.
d. To ensure adequate space and protection are provided for reburial of any TCRs discovered on the project site, the Permittee shall designate a cultural easement area. The easement area shall be in a location that will not be subject to future disturbance and that will not require the relocation of buildings or other physical improvements on the site.
e. The registered professional archaeologist shall file State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) Series 523 forms for the cultural easement/TCR reburial location (if used) with the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) Center in accordance with the guidelines established by the California Office of Historic Preservation. The DPR Series 523 forms shall establish a permanent record of the cultural easement location and any TCRs discovered on the project site for future site identification and protection. The registered professional archeologist shall also file a Sacred Lands File record with the NAHC on behalf of the culturally-affiliated tribe.

Impact CUL-3.1: The proposed development project could result in the discovery disturbance of human remains during excavation of the project site. 10 Findings CUL-3.1: Changes or alterations, which have been incorporated into the project, will reduce the severity of the significant cultural resource impact. Specifically, implementation of MM CUL-3.1, set forth below, which is hereby adopted and incorporated into the project, would avoid and/or reduce significant impacts to unknown buried human remains to a less than significant level by following procedures necessary to identify and protect resources if found.

MM CUL-3.1: In the event that human remains are discovered during excavation and/or grading of the site, all activity within a 50-foot radius of the find shall be stopped. The Santa Clara County Coroner shall be notified and shall make a determination as to whether the remains are of Native American origin or whether an investigation into the cause of death is required. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) immediately. Once NAHC identifies the most likely descendants, the descendants will make recommendations regarding proper burial, which will be implemented in accordance with Section 15064.5(e) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Geology and Soils
Impact GEO-1.1: The project site is located within a mapped liquefaction hazard zone.

Buildings constructed on-site could experience settlement in the event of strong ground shaking as a result of an earthquake.

Findings GEO-1.1: Changes or alterations, which have been incorporated into the project, will reduce the severity of the significant geological hazards impact. Specifically, implementation of MM GEO-1.1, set forth below, which is hereby adopted and incorporated into the project, would reduce geologic hazards impacts to a less than significant level by ensuring that the proposed project complies with the Santa Clara Building Division review process and California Building Code.

MM GEO-1.1: To avoid or minimize potential damage from seismic shaking, the project would be built using standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques.

Building redevelopment design and construction at the site shall be completed in conformance with the recommendations of a design-level geotechnical investigation, which will be included in a report to the City. The report shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Clara’s Building Division as part of the building permit review and issuance process. The building shall meet the requirements of applicable Building and Fire Codes, including the 2016 California Building Code, as adopted or updated by the City. The project shall be designed to withstand potential geologic hazards identified on the site and the project shall be designed to reduce the risk to life or property to the extent feasible and in compliance with the Building Code.

Impact GEO-2.1: Construction activities at the project site would disturb soils on-site and could result in sedimentation and runoff on the project site. 11 Findings GEO-2.1: Changes or alterations, which have been incorporated into the project, will reduce the severity of the significant soil erosion impacts. Specifically, implementation of MM GEO-2.1 through -2.3, set forth below, which are hereby adopted and incorporated into the project, would reduce soil erosion and sedimentation impacts to a less than significant level by ensuring that soils are stabilized on-site and by avoiding activities that disturb dry soils.

MM GEO-2.1: All excavation and grading work would be scheduled in dry weather months or construction sites would be weatherized to withstand or avoid erosion.

MM GEO-2.2: Stockpiles and excavated soils would be covered during construction with secured tarps or plastic sheeting.

MM GEO-2.3: Vegetation in disturbed areas would be replanted as quickly as possible after construction.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Impact HAZ-1.1: The surface and sub-surface soils on-site could be contaminated due to past agricultural operations. Implementation of the project could expose construction workers and adjacent land uses to residual agricultural soil contamination.

Findings HAZ-1.1: Changes or alterations, which have been incorporated into the project, will reduce the severity of the significant hazards and hazardous material impact. Specifically, implementation of MM HAZ-1.1 through -1.3, set forth below, which are hereby adopted and incorporated into the project, would reduce construction worker, future occupant, and surrounding environment exposure to on-site contaminated soil impacts to a less than significant level by additional testing, analysis, and implementation of measures to cap or dispose of contaminated soils consistent with regulatory requirements and under regulatory oversight.

MM HAZ-1.1: Prior to demolition and excavation of the project site, a limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Phase II ESA) will be completed to determine if agricultural chemicals are present in the soil at the site. The site will be sampled for CAM 17 Metals, pesticides, TPH-G, BTEX, and 5-Oxygenates. Phase II ESA sampling activities shall be coordinated with the Santa Clara Fire Department.

MM HAZ-1.2: Following demolition and removal of pavement, soil samples will be gathered from the site and sent for laboratory analyses to evaluate appropriate disposal alternatives. The analyses would include but not be limited to organochlorine pesticides, lead, petroleum hydrocarbons, and other metals. Sampling will occur prior to the issuance of grading permits.

MM HAZ-1.3: In the event that impacted soil is found on-site, the Director of Community Development shall be notified and the lateral and vertical extent of soil containing contaminant concentrations greater than the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (RWQCB’s) environmental screening levels (ESLs) will be identified. Sample results shall be submitted to the Santa Clara Fire Department for review.
12 Contaminated soil shall be handled separately from “clean” soil. Common and potentially applicable remedial measures for the impacted soil may include: 1) excavation and off-site disposal at a permitted facility; 2) the use of engineering and administrative controls, such as consolidation and capping of the soil on-site and land use covenants restricting certain activities/uses; and 3) a combination of the above. Remedial activities at the site, if warranted, will be overseen by an appropriate regulatory agency, such as the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) or the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health (SCCDEH).

Noise
Impact NOI-1.1: Operation of the proposed development project could result in noise levels in excess of City’s Municipal Code noise level performance standards.

Findings NOI-1.1: Changes or alterations, which have been incorporated into the project, will reduce the severity of the significant noise impact. Specifically, implementation of MM NOI1.1, set forth below, which is hereby adopted and incorporated into the project, would reduce operational noise levels from mechanical equipment on the site in order to minimize disruption and annoyance at nearby receptors. With the implementation of this mitigation measure, as well as the City Code limits on allowable mechanical noise, the impact would be reduced to a less than significant level.

MM NOI-1.1: To reduce noise resulting from HVAC equipment operations, one of the following measures shall be implemented:
 Equipment which would generate substantial noise shall be located at a minimum distance of 90 feet from the nearest residential property lines and a minimum distance of 25 feet from adjacent commercial property lines.
 The selection of equipment shall be conducted and approved by a qualified acoustical professional such that equipment does not generate noise which would exceed Municipal Code standards at adjacent property lines.
 If distance and/or equipment selection is not sufficient to reduce equipment noise consistent with the Municipal Code, equipment shall be shielded by walls, such as by a parapet wall constructed along the proposed building’s roof line, such that the adjacent uses are not directly exposed to mechanical equipment noise. To provide adequate noise reduction, walls will be constructed to fully block the line of sight between the equipment and the adjacent property line and shall have a minimum surface weight of three pounds per square foot (such as one-inch-thick wood, one-half inch laminated glass, masonry block, concrete, or one-inch metal).
13 Impact NOI-2.1: Construction of the proposed development project would result in vibratory levels in excess of established guidelines and could damage nearby structures.

Findings NOI-2.1: Changes or alterations, which have been incorporated into the project, will reduce the severity of the significant vibratory impacts resulting from project construction.

Specifically, implementation of MM NOI-2.1, set forth below, which is hereby adopted and incorporated into the project, would place restrictions on equipment use and implement a vibrationmonitoring plan to reduce the construction vibratory impacts from on-site construction activities on sensitive structures to a less than significant level.

MM NOI-2.1: The following measures are incorporated into the project to reduce vibration impacts from construction activities to a less than significant level:
 Prohibit impact or vibratory pile driving as a method of construction. As an alternative, construction of a mat slab, shall be used.
 Limit the use of vibratory rollers, hoe rams, large bulldozers, and caisson drilling, and avoid clam shovel drops within 20 feet of the property lines shared with residences and commercial structures adjacent to the site.
 Place operating equipment on the construction site as far as possible from vibration-sensitive receptors.
 Use smaller equipment to minimize vibration levels below the limits.
 Select demolition methods not involving impact tools.  Avoid dropping heavy objects or materials near vibration sensitive locations.
 A list of all heavy construction equipment to be used for this project known to produce high vibration levels (tracked vehicles, vibratory compaction, jackhammers, hoe rams, etc.) shall be submitted to the City by the contractor. This list shall be used to identify equipment and activities that would potentially generate substantial vibration and to define the level of effort required for continuous vibration monitoring.
 A construction vibration-monitoring plan shall be implemented to document conditions at the residences and commercial structures adjacent to the site prior to, during, and after vibration generating construction activities. All plan tasks shall be undertaken under the direction of a licensed Professional Structural Engineer in the State of California and be in accordance with industry accepted standard methods. The construction vibration monitoring plan should be implemented to include the following tasks:
o Identification of sensitivity to ground-borne vibration of the residences and commercial structures adjacent to the site. A 14 vibration survey (generally described below) would need to be performed.
o Performance of a photo survey, elevation survey, and crack monitoring survey for the residences and commercial
structures nearest to the site. Surveys shall be performed prior to and after completion of vibration generating
construction activities located within 20 feet of the
structure. This distance shall be extended to 80 feet for vibratory pile driving and 120 feet for impact pile driving.

The surveys shall include internal and external crack
monitoring in the structure, settlement, and distress, and shall document the condition of the foundation, walls and other structural elements in the interior and exterior of the structure.
o Conduct a post-survey on the structure where either
monitoring has indicated high levels or complaints of
damage. Make appropriate repairs where damage has
occurred as a result of construction activities.
o The results of any vibration monitoring shall be
summarized and submitted in a report shortly after
substantial completion of each phase identified in the
project schedule. The report will include a description of measurement methods, equipment used, calibration
certificates, and graphics as required to clearly identify vibration-monitoring locations. An explanation of all
events that exceeded vibration limits will be included
together with proper documentation supporting any such
claims.
o Designate a person responsible for registering and
investigating claims of excessive vibration. The contact information of such person shall be clearly posted on the construction site.

VI. GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS
An EIR is required to discuss growth inducing impacts, which consist of the ways in which the project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(d); Pub.

Resources Code Section 21100(b)(5).)
Direct growth inducement would result, for example, if a project involves the construction of substantial new housing that would support an increased population in a community or establishes substantial new permanent employment opportunities. This additional population could, in turn, increase demands for public utilities, public services, roads, and other infrastructure. Indirect growth inducement would result if a project stimulates economic activity that results in physical 15 development or removes an obstacle to growth and development (e.g., increasing infrastructure capacity that would enable new or additional development). CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(d) cautions that it must not be assumed that growth in any area is necessarily beneficial, detrimental, or of little significance to the environment.

These findings are based on the discussion of growth inducing impacts in Section 4.0 of the Draft EIR, the discussion and analysis of which is hereby incorporated in full by this reference.

The project proposes to demolish the existing commercial building on-site and develop 60 residential units. The project would also result in a General Plan Amendment which would increase allowable residential development within the Downtown Precise Plan Area of the City. As discussed in Section

3.19 Utilities and Service Systems of the Draft EIR, expansion of the existing utility infrastructure is not proposed or required because the existing utilities would have capacity for the growth which could occur under the General Plan Amendment. In addition, the site is an infill location within Santa Clara and would not require new roads to be constructed to access the site. For these reasons, the project would not foster or stimulate substantial economic growth or population growth, or the construction of additional housing in the surrounding environment which is not already planned.

VII. SIGNIFICANT AND IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(c) requires that an EIR also address significant and irreversible environmental changes that may occur as a result of project implementation. Significant irreversible changes include the use of nonrenewable resources, the commitment of future generations to similar use, irreversible damage resulting from environmental accidents associated with the project and the irretrievable commitment of resources.

These findings are based on the discussion of significant and irreversible environmental changes in Section 5.0 of the Draft EIR, the discussion and analysis of which is hereby incorporated in full by this reference.

Use of Nonrenewable Resources; Commitment of Future Generations to Similar Use The City of Santa Clara encourages the use of building materials that include recycled materials and makes information available on those building materials to developers. The new buildings would be built to current codes, which require insulation and design to minimize wasteful energy consumption.

The proposed development project would be constructed in compliance with CALGreen requirements and the City’s policies and ordinances controlling wasteful energy use. Moreover, as explained in Section 3.6 of the EIR, the project is consistent with the City's General Plan policies regarding energy use, which foster development that reduces the use, irretrievable commitment and consumption of nonrenewable resources in transportation, buildings and urban services (utilities).

Irreversible Damage Resulting from Environmental Accidents Associated with the Project The project would be constructed consistent with the RWQCB Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit to avoid impacts to waterways. The project site is centrally located which would provide future residents with access to existing transportation networks and other services. Therefore, 16 the project would not likely result in irreversible damage that may result from environmental accidents.

VIII. ALTERNATIVES
CEQA requires that an EIR identify alternatives to a project as it is proposed. Section 15126.6 of the CEQA Guidelines specifies that the EIR should identify alternatives which “would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project.” The EIR considered alternatives of design, scope, or location, which would substantially lessen the project's significant impacts, even if those alternatives “impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives” or are more expensive. While CEQA does not require that alternatives must be capable of meeting all of the project objectives, an alternative's ability to meet most of the objectives is considered relevant to its consideration.

The Project Objectives
The applicant’s objectives for the project are as follows:

3. Preserve two historic single-family residences and one non-historic single-family residence on-site to strengthen the cultural and historical connection of the project to the neighborhood.

4. Create and maintain a residential built environment that promotes the safety and well-being of its residents and the surrounding community.

5. Create a residential transit-oriented project balanced with community-serving amenities that connects to and enhances the City’s bike and pedestrian network, while reducing vehicle trips.

CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and applicable case law have determined that feasibility can be based on a wide range of factors and influences. Section 15126.6(f)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines advises that such factors can include, but are not limited to, the suitability of an alternate site, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, consistency with planning documents or regulatory limitations, jurisdictional boundaries or whether the project proposed can "reasonably acquire, control or otherwise have access to the alternative site."
The City Council, having reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR, hereby finds that the alternatives described below are not feasible. The City finds that there are specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations, including consideration for the 17 provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, and important matters of public policy that render these alternatives infeasible.

As explained above, "feasible" is defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15364 to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, legal, social, and technological factors." According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(3), the City may reject an alternative to the project if the City finds that it would be infeasible to implement that alternative because of "[s]pecific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers." An agency also may reject an alternative that does not meet the public policy goals of the agency. In Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of Rialto (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 899, 947, the City of Rialto approved a project while rejecting as infeasible a reduced-density alternative that stripped out the portions of the project that would have created a synergistic mix of retail and restaurant tenants. Additionally, in Environmental Council of Sacramento v. City of Sacramento (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 1018, 1039, the appellate court upheld the City of Sacramento's findings that additional preservation of open space would be infeasible because it would "at the very least [slow] 'the progress of necessary development such that the public's health and welfare is harmed through the lack of economic growth and productivity and a shortage of housing supply."2 These findings are based on the discussion of alternatives in Section 7.0 of the Draft EIR and Section

5.0 of the Final EIR, the discussion and analysis of which are hereby incorporated in full by this reference.

Alternatives Considered but Rejected
The alternative location needed to be of similar size to the project site, within the Downtown Precise Plan area of the City, and near existing transit. A site of similar size that could be redeveloped is present in the downtown area, however, the project applicant does not have control of alternative sites of similar size in the City. Additionally, the sites in the downtown area would result in similar impacts for biological, air quality, noise, and hazards impacts. For these reasons, an alternative location to the project was considered but rejected as infeasible.

No Project Alternative - No Development Alternative
The CEQA Guidelines specifically require consideration of a “No Project” Alternative. The purpose of including a No Project Alternative is to allow decision makers to compare the impacts of approving the project with the impacts of not approving the project. CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6 specifically advises that the No Project Alternative is “what would be reasonably expected to occur in the foreseeable future if the project were not approved, based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure and community services,” and emphasizes that an EIR should take a practical approach, and not “…create and analyze a set of artificial assumptions that would be required to preserve the existing physical environment.”

2 Similarly, courts have upheld an agency's infeasibility finding on a policy-based rationale in the following cases: Gilroy Citizens for Responsible Planning v. City of Gilroy (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 911, 936, and Defend the Bay v. City of Irvine (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 1261, 1270. 18 The No Project – No Development Alternative would retain the existing commercial building and single-family residences as is. If the project site were to remain as is, there would be no significant impacts. This alternative would not meet any of the project objectives. In addition, the City would lose the opportunity to redevelop an underutilized site in a central location near services and transit to meet the strategies and goals of the City of Santa Clara General Plan.

The project site has a zoning designation of Historic Combining, General Office, and Community Commercial and which is intended to serve the needs of the general population. It is possible that in the future an alternative development proposal, such as another mixed-use building, may be presented for the project site. These projects would be required to comply with zoning regulations and would have similar impacts related to construction and geologic impact areas. Any future development proposals for the site would require review and approval by the City of Santa Clara.

This alternative would not result in a residential development fitting the project objectives because the zoning for the project site would not allow for a residential development.

Reduced Development Alternative
Impacts associated with the proposed development project would primarily result from construction of the project. While all impacts have been mitigated to less than significant, a reduced density alternative would lessen and/or avoid one of more of the construction related impacts.

A building of reduced size would require the use of heavy construction equipment for a shorter period of time and could allow for greater setbacks between the new construction and existing historic buildings. This would reduce the construction impacts on historic structures resulting from construction vibration. Additionally, air quality and noise impacts during construction would be incrementally reduced. Although a reduced size alternative would lessen the impacts of noise and air quality, mitigation could still be required to reduce particulate matter and noise impacts from heavy machinery. Impacts to subsurface archaeological resources and nesting birds, and impacts from soil conditions and contamination would still occur and be comparable to the proposed development project. Therefore, the reduced development alternative would result in similar impacts to the proposed development project.

The reduced development alternative would develop the site with residential units, which may include townhouses and would provide amenities and a housing mix which would meet project objectives 1 and 2. A reduced size of project would retain the historic structures on-site, as stated in project objective 3, and would strengthen the cultural and historical connection of the project to the neighborhood. Any development on-site would be required to comply with the local zoning regulations which promote safety and wellbeing of the surrounding environment, so the alternative would satisfy project objective 4. The alternative would create a transit-oriented development with local serving amenities and would be constructed with environmentally responsible construction techniques in accordance with the City’s General Plan goals and policies. Therefore, the alternative would satisfy project objectives 5 and 6.

Environmentally Superior Alternative
19 The CEQA Guidelines state that an EIR shall identify an environmentally superior alternative. Based on the above discussion, the environmentally superior alternative to the proposed project is the No Project - No Development Alternative because all of the project’s significant environmental impacts would be avoided. However, Section 15126.6(e)(2) states that “if the environmentally superior alternative is the No Project Alternative, the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives.” In addition to the No Project -No Development Alternative (as well as the No Project – No Development Alternative), the Reduced Development Alternative would avoid or result in lesser impacts than the proposed project.

Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project - EIR Page 1 of 3 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE

CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING

THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY THE ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT REPORT, MAKE FINDINGS WITH RESPECT

THERETO, AND ADOPT THE MITIGATION AND REPORTING
PROGRAM FOR THE 950 MONROE STREET MIXED-USE
PROJECT LOCATED AT 906-950 MONROE STREET AND 1341

HOMESTEAD ROAD, SANTA CLARA
PLN2020-14457 (General Plan Amendment and Rezone)
SCH# 2021100581

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the City prepared written Responses to Comments Received during the Comment Period and included those responses in a Final Environmental Impact Report (“FEIR”). The FEIR consists of a list of agencies and organizations to whom the DEIR was sent, a list of the comment letters received on the DEIR, revisions to the text of the DEIR, responses to comments received on the DEIR, and copies of comment letters; WHEREAS, the DEIR and FEIR constitute the EIR for the Project; WHEREAS, the EIR identified certain significant and potentially significant adverse effects on the environment that would be caused by the Project as proposed; WHEREAS, the EIR outlined various mitigation measures that would avoid the Project's significant effects on the environment, as well as alternatives to the Project as proposed that would provide some environmental advantages;
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 requires a lead agency, before approving a project for which an EIR has been prepared and certified, to adopt findings specifying whether Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project - EIR Page 3 of 3 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
mitigation measures and, in some instances, alternatives discussed in the EIR, have been adopted or rejected as infeasible;
WHEREAS, the "CEQA Findings" attached to this Resolution is a set of Findings of Fact prepared in order to satisfy the requirements of Guidelines Section 15091;WHEREAS, on May 11, 2023, notices of the May 24, 2023 public hearing to consider the EIR were posted within 300 feet of the Project Site and mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the property, according to the most recent Assessor’s roll;
WHEREAS, on May 24, 2023, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing and then voted to continue the hearing to June 14, 2023;
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2023, the Planning Commission reconvened the public hearing and the voted to again continue the hearing to July 13, 2023; WHEREAS, on July 13, 2023 the Planning Commission again reconvened the public hearing, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to provide testimony and the Commission considered the information presented in the Staff Report, and all verbal and written evidence.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the Planning Commission hereby finds that the above Recitals are true and correct and by this reference makes them a part hereof.

2. That the Planning Commission hereby finds that all potentially significant environmental impacts that may directly or indirectly result from the Project would be reduced to a less-thansignificant level by the mitigation measures specified in the EIR and MMRP.

3. That the Planning Commission hereby finds the EIR has been presented to the Commission, which reviewed and considered the information and analysis contained therein before making its determination, and that the EIR reflects the Commission’s independent judgment and analysis.

Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project - EIR Page 4 of 3 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17

4. That the Planning Commission hereby finds, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, that all of the proposed mitigation measures described in the EIR are feasible, and therefore will become binding upon the City and affected landowners and their assigns or successors in interest as conditions of approval when the Project is approved.

5. That the Planning Commission hereby finds that the EIR is complete and prepared in compliance with CEQA.

6. That the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council finds that the approval of this Project as mitigated will have no significant negative impacts on the area’s environmental resources, cumulative or otherwise, as the impacts as mitigated would fall within the environmental thresholds identified by CEQA.

7. That, in order to comply with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program as set forth in the attached "MMRP". The MMRP is designed to ensure that, during project implementation, the City, affected landowners, their assigns and successors in interest and any other responsible parties comply with the feasible mitigation measures identified. The MMRP identifies, for each mitigation measure, the action to be taken and the party responsible for implementation.

8. That the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council certify the EIR, adopt the CEQA Findings, and adopt the MMRP for the Project as required by the CEQA Guidelines.

9. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED

AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A SPECIAL MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2023, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COMMISSIONERS:

Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project - EIR Page 5 of 3 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:

ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:

ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS:

ATTEST:
___________________________

ANDREW CRABTREE

DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

CITY OF SANTA CLARA
Attachments Incorporated by Reference:

1. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)

2. CEQA Findings

3. Development Plans
Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project - General Plan Amendment Page 1 of 5 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE

CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING

THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A GENERAL PLAN

AMENDMENT TO MODIFY THE TEXT OF THE COMMUNITY

MIXED-USE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR PROPERTIES IN

THE DOWNTOWN FOCUS AREA AND MAKE RELATED

CHANGES TO GENERAL PLAN POLICIES
PLN2020-14457 (General Plan Amendment and Rezoning)

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on June, 16 2020, Lamb Partners, LLC (“Owner”) made an application for a General Plan Amendment in connection with development of a 0.87-acre site located at 906-950 Monroe Street and 1341 Homestead Road (APNs: 269-20-086, 269-20-087, and 269-20-095), which is currently developed with a 6,537 square foot commercial building and three existing single-family residences (“Project Site”);
WHEREAS, the Owner applied for a General Plan Amendment to modify the Community Mixed Use (CMU) land use designation and related policies so that the CMU designation would allow for a density of up to 70 dwelling units per acre on mixed-use sites within the Downtown Focus Area that meet the following criteria: 1) The property is located within 0.25 miles of a fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours; 2) The development provides ground floor retail uses at a minimum FAR of 0.10; 3) If the project site is listed on the City’s Historic Preservation and Resource Inventory or the California Register of Historical Resources, any development affecting the historically significant structure shall be performed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties; and 4) The project provides for affordable housing through the payment of in-lieu fees and/or includes affordable units;
Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project - General Plan Amendment Page 2 of 5 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
WHEREAS, the Owner has simultaneously applied for a Rezone of the Project Site from General Office (OG), Historic Combining (HT), and Community Commercial to Planned Development (PD) and a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to allow an a residential mixed-use development consisting of 50 condominium units in a six-story structure, four townhomes, and three existing single-family residences with onsite and offsite improvements (“Project”), as shown on the Development Plans, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; WHEREAS, Santa Clara City Charter Section 1007 requires that the Planning Commission provide input to the City Council on any proposed General Plan Amendment; WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65353 requires the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing prior to making a recommendation on the General Plan Amendment; WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Project and was noticed and circulated for a 45-day public review period from October 14, 2022 to November 30, 2022;
WHEREAS, while considering the General Plan Amendment for the Project Site, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the information contained in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Project;
WHEREAS, notice of the May 24, 2023 public hearing on the proposed General Plan Amendment was published in the Weekly, a newspaper of general circulation for the City, on May 10, 2023; WHEREAS, on May 11, 2023, notices of the May 24, 2023 public hearing on the General Plan Amendment were posted within 300 feet of the Project Site and mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the property, according to the most recent Assessor’s roll; WHEREAS, on May 24, 2023, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing and then voted to continue the hearing to June 14, 2023;
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2023, the Planning Commission reconvened the public hearing and the voted to again continue the hearing to July 13, 2023;
Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project - General Plan Amendment Page 3 of 5 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
WHEREAS, on July 13, 2023, the Planning Commission again reconvened the public hearing, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to provide testimony and the Commission considered the information presented in the Staff Report, and all verbal and written evidence.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the Planning Commission hereby finds that the above Recitals are true and correct and by this reference makes them a part hereof.

2. General Plan Amendment Findings: that the Planning Commission finds and determines that the General Plan Amendment is in the interest of the public good for the following reasons:

A. The proposed amendment is deemed to be in the public interest, in that:

The Project is located in an urbanized area served by existing infrastructure and municipal services. The Project would contribute 53 multi-family dwelling units to the City’s housing stock in proximity to a mixed use and transportation corridor with access to neighborhood and community commercial uses, support services, local and regional transit facilities, outdoor open space and recreation areas. The Project provides a residential mixed-use development consisting of 50 condominium units in a six-story structure, four townhomes, and three existing single-family residences with onsite and offsite improvements. The Project would contribute to the City’s housing stock and lessen the jobs/housing imbalance in support of the City’s General Plan Land Use and Housing goals and policies. The Project observes several of the Transition Policies of the General Plan in site and building design to integrate into the community, and the proposal would modify policies that are inconsistent with the proposal. The Project would implement project conditions of approval to avoid and reduce impacts of development.

B. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent and compatible with the rest of the General Plan and any implementation programs that may be affected, in that:

Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project - General Plan Amendment Page 4 of 5 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
The Project would combine and redevelop underutilized commercial and residential parcels to provide housing and commercial opportunities for the Downtown Focus Area, which support the City’s Housing Goals and assist the City in achieving RHNA targets for production of affordable housing units as mandated by the State, and in accordance with Affordable Housing ordinance.

C. The proposed amendment has been processed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California Government Code and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), in that:

The City notified An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Project and was noticed and circulated for a 45-day public review period from October 14, 2022 to November 30, 2022 to the public agencies which have jurisdiction by law with respect to the Project, as well as to other interested persons, organizations and agencies, and the City sought the comments of such persons, organizations and agencies. The City prepared and circulated written responses to the comments received during the Comment Period and included those responses in a Final Environmental Impact Report (“FEIR”), in accordance with CEQA.

D. The potential impacts of the proposed General Plan Amendment have been assessed and have been determined not to be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, in that:

A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for implementation with Project development to reduce potentially significant impacts identified in the EIR to less than significant.

3. That pursuant to Government Code § 65354, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council, amend the General Plan by revising the definition of “Community Mixed Use” contained in Subsection 5.2.2 (“Land Use Classifications and Diagram”) of Section 5.2 (“Land Use Diagram”) of Chapter 5 (“Goals and Policies”) to read as follows:
“Community Mixed Use
Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project - General Plan Amendment Page 5 of 5 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
This classification is a combination of the Community Commercial and Medium Density Residential designations and is intended to encourage a mix of residential and commercial uses along major streets. Auto‐oriented uses are not appropriate in this designation, except under certain circumstances within the El Camino Real Focus Area. Parking should be behind buildings, below‐grade or in structures, to ensure that active uses face public streets. Retail, commercial and neighborhood office uses, at a minimum FAR of 0.10, are required in conjunction with residential development.

Except as otherwise provided below, the density shall be between 20 and 36 units per acre.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a density range of 20 to 70 units per acre shall apply if all of the following are true:

1. The property is located within 0.25 miles of a fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours;

2. The development provides ground floor retail uses at a minimum FAR of 0.10;

3. If the project site is listed on the City’s Historic Preservation and Resource Inventory or the California Register of Historical Resources, any development affecting the historically significant structure shall be performed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties; and

4. The project provides for affordable housing through the payment of in-lieu fees and/or includes affordable units, in compliance with the City’s Affordable Housing Ordinance.”

4. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council amend Policy 5.5.2-P5 of Subsection 5.5.2 (“Transition Goals and Policies”) of Section 5.5 (“Neighborhood Compatibility”) of Chapter 5 (“Goals and Policies”) of the General Plan to read as follows:

Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project - General Plan Amendment Page 6 of 5 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
“5.5.2‐P5 Except for properties located in the Downtown Focus Area, require that new development provide an appropriate transition to surrounding neighborhoods.”

5. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council amend Policy 5.5.2-P7 of Subsection 5.5.2 (“Transition Goals and Policies”) of Section 5.5 (“Neighborhood Compatibility”) of Chapter 5 (“Goals and Policies”) of the General Plan to read as follows:
“5.5.2‐P7 Except for properties located in the Downtown Focus Area, for buildings of three stories or greater, increase the setback of upper stories where they abut lower-intensity residential uses.”

6. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council amends the second paragraph of Subsection 5.4.2 (“Downtown Focus Area Goals and Policies”) of Section 5.4 (“Focus Areas”) of Chapter 5 (“Goals and Policies”) of the General Plan to read as follows:
“The Downtown Focus Area offers opportunities for place‐making and for a unique destination in the City to serve both local and regional interests. Revitalization will support the Major Strategies for City identity and community vitality. Connecting streets and increasing access to transit will attract residents and visitors. This vision for Santa Clara’s Downtown also includes approximately 130,000 square feet of retail and commercial uses along with almost 400 new residences on the approximately seven‐acre site designated as Downtown Core on Figure 5.4‐3. Development under this designation could be at intensities of almost 2.0 FAR, with building heights between five and eight stories. Allowed The maximum building intensity and heights throughout in the remainder of the Downtown Focus Area are typically lower, with maximum heights between three and four is eight stories. Policies related to Areas of Historic Sensitivity, in Section

5.6: Historic Preservation, and to transitions, in Section 5.5: Neighborhood Compatibility, also apply in respect to maintaining the existing character and development patterns of the surrounding area, excluding the properties designated as Downtown Core. ” Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed Use Project - General Plan Amendment Page 7 of 5 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17

7. That, based on the findings set forth in this Resolution and the evidence in the City Staff Report and such other evidence as received at the public hearing on this matter the Planning Commission hereby recommends City Council approval of the General Plan Amendment. ///
///
///
///
///
///
////
///
///
///

8. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED

AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A SPECIAL MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2023, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COMMISSIONERS:

NOES: COMMISSIONERS:

ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:

ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS:

ATTEST: ______________________________________

ANDREW CRABTREE

DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

CITY OF SANTA CLARA
Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use - Rezone Page 1 of 4 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE

CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING

THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A REZONING FROM

GENERAL OFFICE (OG), HISTORIC COMBINING (HT), AND

COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) TO PLANNED

DEVELOPMENT (PD) TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 906-950 MONROE STREET
AND 1341 HOMESTEAD ROAD, SANTA CLARA
PLN2020-14457 (General Plan Amendment and Rezone)

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on June 16, 2020, Lamb Partners LLC (“Owner”) filed a development application for the .87 acre parcel located at 906-950 Monroe Street and 1341 Homestead Road (APNs:
269-20-086, 269-20-087, and 269-20-095), which is currently developed with a 6,537 square foot commercial building and three existing single-family residences (“Project Site”); WHEREAS, the Owner applied for a General Plan Amendment to modify the Community MixedUse designation and related policies; a Rezone of the Project Site from General Office (OG), Historic Combining (HT), and Community Commercial to Planned Development (PD); and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to allow a residential mixed-use development consisting of 50 condominium units in a six-story structure, four townhomes, and three existing single-family residences with onsite and offsite improvements (“Project”), as shown on the Development Plans, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; WHEREAS, a rezone of the property to PD is required to allow creative development standards for site and building design, that are not otherwise allowed in standard zoning districts, to construct the proposed residential mixed-use development; WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Project and was noticed and circulated for a 45-day public review period from October 14, 2022 to November 30, 2022;
Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use - Rezone Page 2 of 4 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
WHEREAS, the EIR identified potential significant impacts of Project development that with implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) will reduce potential mitigation measures to less than significant and will be incorporated into the Project;
WHEREAS, the Project Site includes property that currently has a Historic Combining (HT) zoning designation;
WHEREAS, SCCC Section 18.58.030 provides for the review and input of the Historical and Landmarks Commission (HLC) prior to rezoning an HT property; WHEREAS, on June 29, 2023, the HLC conducted a duly noticed public meeting, at the conclusion of which, the Commission voted to recommend that the Planning Commission disapprove the rezoning request, based upon the six-story scale of the project in relation to oneand two-story single-family residences.

WHEREAS, Santa Clara City Code (SCCC) Section 18.112.030 provides for the review and recommendation of the City’s Planning Commission of all rezoning requests before action is to be taken by the City Council;
WHEREAS, on May 11, 2023, notices of the May 24, 2023 public hearing on the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map were posted within 300 feet of the Project Site and mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the property, according to the most recent Assessor’s roll; and
WHEREAS, on May 24, 2023, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing and then voted to continue the hearing to June 14, 2023;
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2023, the Planning Commission reconvened the public hearing and the voted to again continue the hearing to July 13, 2023; WHEREAS, on July 13, 2023, the Planning Commission again reconvened the public hearing, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to provide testimony and the Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use - Rezone Page 3 of 4 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
Commission considered the information presented in the Staff Report, and all verbal and written evidence.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the Planning Commission hereby finds that the above Recitals are true and correct and by this reference makes them a part hereof.

2. That the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council rezone the Project Site from General Office (OG), Historic Combining (HT), and Community Commercial (CC) to Planned Development (PD) to allow the development of the Project, as shown on the attached Development Plans and conditioned as specified in the attached Conditions of Rezoning Approval, incorporated herein by this reference.

3. Pursuant to SCCC Code Section 18.112.040, the Planning Commission determines that the following findings exist in support of the rezoning:

A. The existing zoning is inappropriate or inequitable, in that the existing zoning for the Project Site does not allow for residential development and the creation of housing opportunities envisioned by the 2010-2035 General Plan. A PD zoning of the Project Site to allow residential development would implement the General Plan’s Land Use and Housing goals and policies to provide housing in proximity to existing residential, neighborhood and community commercial uses, support services, local and regional transit facilities, outdoor open space and recreation areas.

B. The proposed zone change will conserve property values, protect or improve the existing character and stability of the area in question, and will promote the orderly and beneficial development of such area, in that the proposal redevelops an underutilized commercial parcel for residential development that observes several of the Transition Policies of the General Plan for site and building design, on- and -off-site improvements to integrate into the community, and the proposal would modify policies that are inconsistent with the proposal.

Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use - Rezone Page 4 of 4 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
The Project would implement conditions of approval to avoid and reduce impacts of development.

C. The proposed zone change is required by public necessity, public convenience, or the general welfare of the City in that the proposed zone change would allow for high density residential development within a six-story structure, on-site parking and security, private and common open space, and indoor community meeting space. Construction of the project would contribute to the City’s housing inventory and assist in production of housing units to achieve RHNA targets as mandated by the State.

D. The proposed zone change would allow imaginative planning and design concepts to be utilized that would otherwise be restricted in other zoning districts in that the proposed zone change would allow flexibility in the development standards to minimize building footprint and increase building height to provide high density housing with private and rooftop common open space, and that also provides community meeting space that is available for public use.

4. That based on the findings set forth in this resolution and the evidence in the City Staff Report, EIR and MMRP, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council rezone the Project Site to allow a residential mixed-use development consisting of 50 condominium units in a six-story structure, four townhomes, and three existing single-family residences with onsite and offsite improvements, as shown on the attached Development Plans and conditioned as specified in the attached Conditions of Rezoning Approval.

5. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED

AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A SPECIAL MEETING THEREOF HELD ON 13th DAY OF JULY 2023 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COMMISSIONERS:

Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use - Rezone Page 5 of 4 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:

ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:

ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS:

Attachments Incorporated by Reference:

1. Rezone Conditions of Approval

2. Development Plans
ATTEST:

ANDREW CRABTREE

DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

CITY OF SANTA CLARA
Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project - Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Page 1 of 5 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17; Typed: 05/15/23
RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE

CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING

THAT THE CITY COUNCCIL APPROVE A VESTING
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP (PLN22-00390) AT 906-950
MONROE STREET AND 1341 HOMESTEAD ROAD, SANTA
CLARA

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on June, 16 2020, Lamb Partners, LLC (“Owner”) made an application for a General Plan Amendment in connection with development of a 0.87-acre site located at 906- 950 Monroe Street and 1341 Homestead Road (APNs: 269-20-086, 269-20-087, and 269-20- 095), which is currently developed with a 6,537 square foot commercial building and three existing single-family residences (“Project Site”);
WHEREAS, the applied for a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide three existing parcels into two single-family parcels and one mixed-use parcel with 50 condominium units, four townhouses, one detached single-family dwelling unit, one condominium unit for all common floor common area, two condominium units of basement parking, and three retail condominium units;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.05.210 of the Code of the City of Santa Clara (“SCCC”), a Tentative Subdivision Map shall be required for all divisions of land into five or more parcels; WHEREAS, on July 19, 2022, the Subdivision Clearance Committee determined that the application was complete and that the proposed Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map should proceed to the Planning Commission in conformance with Section 17.05.300 of the SCCC; WHEREAS, SCCC Section 17.05.300(g) requires that the Planning Commission make recommendations of denial, approval or conditional approval to the City Council on the Tentative Subdivision Map;
Resolution/ 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project - Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Page 2 of 5 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17; Typed: 05/15/23
WHEREAS, the proposed Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the development of a residential mixed-use development consisting of 50 condominium units in a six-story structure, four townhomes, and three existing single-family residences with onsite and offsite improvements;
WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Project was noticed and circulated for a 45-day public review period from October 14, 2022 to November 30, 2022;
WHEREAS, on May 11, 2023, notices of the May 24, 2023 public hearing on the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map were posted within 300 feet of the Project Site and mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the property, according to the most recent Assessor’s roll; WHEREAS, a notice of the May 24, 2023 public hearing was published in The Weekly, a newspaper of general circulation, on May 10, 2023 for a meeting to be conducted on May 24, 2023; and
WHEREAS, on May 24, 2023, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing and then voted to continue the hearing to June 14, 2023;
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2023, the Planning Commission reconvened the public hearing and the voted to again continue the hearing to July 13, 2023; WHEREAS, on July 13, 2023, the Planning Commission again reconvened the public hearing, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to provide testimony and the Commission considered the information presented in the Staff Report, and all verbal and written evidence.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the Planning Commission hereby finds that the above Recitals are true and correct and by this reference makes them a part hereof.

Resolution/ 1530 AND 1540 Pomeroy Avenue- Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Page 3 of 5 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17

2. Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Findings. Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 66426 and 66428 and SCCC Section 17.05.300(h), the Planning Commission finds and determines that:

A. The Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the City’s General Plan, as proposed to be modified, in that the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map subdivides the existing 0.87 acre Project Site to allow a residential mixed-use project in the Downtown Focus Area, subject to conditions set forth in the Conditions of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Approval, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.

B. The design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the City’s General Plan in that the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map facilitates development of housing stock and construction of ownership housing opportunities for the community; and furthermore complies with General Plan Land Use and Transitional Goals and Polices of the General Plan, as modified, in that it transforms the commercial lot to a residential mixed-use development that would transition in scale and intensity of use with existing and planned land uses; and is in proximity to transit with multi-modal connections to local and regional transit service to support transit ridership and reduce vehicle miles traveled.

C. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development, in that the Project provides a transition between low intensity residential development and the Downtown Focus Area.

D. The site is physically suitable for the proposed intensity of development, in that the Project Site is located in an urbanized area and is served by existing utilities and infrastructure.

E. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious health problems, in that the proposed residential subdivision will implement Covenants Resolution/ 1530 AND 1540 Pomeroy Avenue- Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Page 4 of 5 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
Conditions and Restrictions for operation and maintenance of the building and site improvements and does not propose the use of hazardous materials.

F. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and will not substantially or unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat in that the Project Site is located in an urbanized setting, is a developed site, and the proposed subdivision includes mitigation measures, as identified in the EIR, that reduces impacts to less-than-significant levels.

G. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that it is designed to avoid encroachment and conflicts with public easements in the site design.

H. The Tentative Subdivision Map provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities, in that it would allow flexibility in the development standards to maximize the benefits of green building standards for site and building design.

3. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution and the evidence in the Staff Report and such other evidence as received at the public hearings on this matter before the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to the City Council, substantially in the form on file as shown on the attached Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Conditions of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Approval, hereby incorporated by this reference.

4. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED

AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A SPECIAL MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2023, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COMMISSIONERS:

NOES: COMMISSIONERS:

Resolution/ 1530 AND 1540 Pomeroy Avenue- Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Page 5 of 5 Rev. Rev: 11/22/17
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:

ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS:

ATTEST:

ANDREW CRABTREE

DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

CITY OF SANTA CLARA
Attachments Incorporated by Reference:

1. Development Plan with Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map

2. Conditions of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Approval PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 1 of 19

CONDITIONS OF REZONE AND GPA APPROVAL
950 MONROE STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT

GENERAL
G1. If relocation of an existing public facility becomes necessary due to a conflict with the developer's new improvements, then the cost of said relocation shall be borne by the developer.

G2. Comply with all applicable codes, regulations, ordinances and resolutions.

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
A1. The Developer agrees to defend and indemnify and hold City, its officers, agents, employees, officials and representatives free and harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, attorneys' fees, injuries, costs, and liabilities arising from any suit for damages or for equitable or injunctive relief which is filed by a third party against the City by reason of its approval of developer's project.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

BUILDING DIVISION
BD1. Informational: Prior to overall construction permit application, submit to the Santa Clara Building Division, 2 copies of an addressing diagram request, to be prepared by a licensed architect or engineer. The addressing diagram(s) shall include all proposed streets and all building floor plans. The addressing diagram(s) shall conform to Santa Clara City Manager Directive #5; Street Name and Building Number Changes, and Santa Clara Building Division Address Policy For Residential and Commercial Developments. The addressing diagram(s) shall indicate all unit numbers to be based off established streets, not alleys nor access-ways to garages. Allow a minimum of 10 working days for initial staff review. Please note city staff policy that existing site addresses typically are retired. Provide digital pdf printed from design software, not scanned from printed paper sheet.
o Any building or structure that is demolished shall have its address retired and a new address/s shall be issued for the project.

BD2. Informational: The construction permit application drawings submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include a copy of the latest Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Zone Map: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home. The project drawings shall indicate how the project complies with the Santa Clara Flood Damage Prevention Code.
 FEMA Flood Zone map designations and requirements are based on the map in effect at date of Building Permit issuance.

BD3. Informational: The construction permit application drawings submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Low Impact Development (LID) practices http://www.scvurpppw2k.com/nd_wp.shtml. All projects that disturb more than one acre, or projects that are part of a larger development that in total disturbs more than one acre, shall comply with the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Best Management Practices (BMP): http://www.scvurppp-w2k.com/construction_bmp.shtml, and shall provide a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by a certified Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). All site drainage and grading permit applications submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include a city of Santa Clara "C3" data form, PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 2 of 19
available on this web page:https://www.santaclaraca.gov/our-city/departments-gz/public-works/environmental-programs/stormwater-pollution-prevention and will be routed to a contract consultant for review.

BD4. Informational: no California construction code review is being done at this time. The construction permit application drawings submitted to the Santa Clara Building Division shall include an overall California Building Code analysis, including; proposed use and occupancy of all spaces (19' CBC Ch. 3), all building heights and areas (19' CBC Ch. 5), all proposed types of construction (19' CBC Ch. 6), all proposed fire and smoke protection features, including all types of all fire rated penetrations proposed (19' CBC Ch. 7), all proposed interior finishes fire resistance (19' CBC Ch. 8), all fire protection systems proposed (19' CBC Ch. 9), and all means of egress proposed (19' CBC Ch. 10). -Noncombustible exterior wall, floor, and roof finishes are strongly encouraged.  During construction retaining a single company to install all fire rated penetrations is highly recommended.
 The grade level lobbies shall be min.1 hour rated all sides and above.  All stair shafts shall be min. 1 hour rated.
 All elevator shafts shall be min. 1 hour rated.
 All trash chute shafts shall be min. 1 hour rated.
 Recommendation: provide a minimum of two trash chutes; one for recyclables, one for trash, each trash chute to be routed down to a grade level trash collection room.
 Any trash rooms shall be min. 1 hour rated all sides and above.

BD5. Informational: The overall project construction permit application shall include the geotechnical, architectural, structural, energy, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing drawings and calculations. Prior to the issuance of the overall project construction permit, a conditions of approval review meeting must be held in city hall, which meeting must be attended by the on-site field superintendent(s). The meeting will not be held without the attendance of the on-site field superintendent(s). The on-site grading permit shall be a separate permit application to the Building Division.

BD6. Informational: Temporary Certificates of Occupancy will not be routinely issued and will be considered on a very limited basis only when there is a clear and compelling reason for city staff to consider a TCO. A TCO will be approved only after all applicable City staff have approved in writing; Planning, P.W./ Engineering, Fire Prev., Santa Clara Water, Silicon Valley Power, and any other applicable agencies such as the Santa Clara County Health Dept., with the Building Division being the final approval of all TCO.'s.

BD7. See Title 15 of the Santa Clara City Code for any amendments to the California Building Codes.

BD8. This project is subject to the provisions of the City of Santa Clara 2022 Reach Code, effective January 2022 See Ordinance No. 2034 and/or Title 15 of the Santa Clara City Code.
 Chp. 15.36 – Energy Code for “all electric” provisions for new construction. i. Subject to CA Energy Commission acceptance and approval and on this project’s entitlement date.
 Chp. 15.38 – Green Building Code for additional Electric Vehicle Charging requirements for new construction.

HOUSING & COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION
H1. In accordance with the Santa Clara City Code chapter 17.40, this project is subject to the affordable housing requirements and impact fee for the proposed 54 units of for-sale residential development.The Applicant shall provide not less than fifteen percent (15%) PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 3 of 19
of the units (or 8.10 units) to affordable households made available at affordable sales prices to extremely low, very low, low and/or moderate-income households as long as the distribution of affordable units averages to a maximum of one-hundred (100) percent of Area Median Income. All prices are set in accordance with the City’s Below Market Purchase (BMP) Program Policies and Procedures Manual (subject to updates and changes). Applicant shall be responsible for cost incurred under the California Building Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 24) for the each affordable for- sale residential unit. Additionally, where the calculation of affordable housing requirements results in a fractional unit, the Applicant shall either pay an In-Lieu Fee or the Applicant shall provide an additional unit to satisfy the requirement. Any in-lieu fee payment due to the City by the Applicant shall be payable prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The in-lieu fee amount shall be equal to the difference between the unrestricted appraised market value ("Initial Market Value") and the Affordable Sales Price of one of the BMP units at completion, multiplied by the fractional unit. The Initial Market Value of the last BMP unit sold shall be the basis for calculating the in-lieu fee to be paid by Applicant.

H2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the Developer shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) with the City that will determine the Affordable Sales Price, identify the actual unit to be sold as the Affordable Unit, and apply all terms and covenants guaranteeing the prescribed affordability. Satisfaction of the affordable housing obligation shall be memorialized in the AHA and subject to City Council approval. There will be a fee for the AHA preparation in the amount of $4,020 which will be due prior to execution of the AHA.

PLANNING DIVISION
P1. Obtain required permits and inspections from the Building Official and comply with the conditions thereof. If this project involves land area of 1 acre or more, the developer shall file a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the State Water Resources Control Board prior to issuance of any building permit for grading, or construction; a copy of the NOI shall be sent to the City Building Inspection Division. A storm water pollution prevention plan is also required with the NOI.

P2. Comply with all requirements of Building and associated codes (the CBC. CEC, CMC, CPC, California Green Building Code, the California Energy Code, etc.) current at the time of application for Building Permit, that includes grading and site utility permits.

P3. It shall be the Developer's responsibility through his engineer to provide written certification that the drainage designs for the subject property will prevent flood water intrusion in the event of a storm of 100-year return period. The Developer's engineer shall verify that the site will be protected from off-site water intrusion by designing the on-site grading and storm water collection system using the 100- year hydraulic grade line elevation provided by the City's Engineering Department or the Federal Flood Insurance Rate Map, whichever is more restrictive. Said certification shall be submitted to the City Building Inspection Division prior to issuance of building permits.

P4. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, Developer/Owner shall have an asbestos survey of the proposed site performed by a certified individual. Survey results and notice of the proposed demolition are to be sent to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). No demolition shall be performed PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 4 of 19
without a demolition permit and BAAQMD approval and, if necessary, proper asbestos removal.

P5. Incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) into construction plans and incorporate post construction water runoff measures into project plans in accordance with the City’s Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program standards prior to the issuance of permits. Proposed BMPs shall be submitted to and thereafter reviewed and approved by the Planning Division and the Building Inspection Division for incorporation into construction drawings and specifications.

P6. An erosion control plan shall be prepared and copies provided to the Planning Division and to the Building Inspection Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits or building permits that involve substantial disturbance of substantial ground area.

P7. The Final Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) must be certified by a thirdparty consultant from SCVURPP’s current list of qualified consultants. Five copies of the approval letter from the certified third party review (wet stamped and signed) must be submitted prior to the issuance of grading or building permit.

P8. Prior to the issuance final occupancy, the applicant shall enter into Operations and Maintenance (O&M) agreement with the City. The project operator is responsible for the operations and maintenance of the SWMP and stormwater BMPs consistent with the O&M agreement throughout the life of the project.

P9. The Developer is required to prepare, institute, and monitor a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan to reduce vehicle miles traveled by at least 20% of which at least 10% is achieved through TDM measures.

P10. The Developer shall submit the TDM plan to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of the occupancy permit.

P11. Each calendar year after issuance of the certificate of occupancy, an annual review of the TDM plan shall be completed by a qualified third part consultant, and the third-party consultant shall submit the TDM annual report covering the prior calendar year to the Planning Division for review and approval to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.

P12. Trees permitted by the City for removal shall provide replacement on- or off-site at a 2:1 ratio with 24-inch box or a 1:1 with 36” box.

P13. Site landscaping shall be maintained in good condition throughout the life of the Project and no trees shall be removed without City review and approval.

P14. Developer is responsible for collection and pick-up of all trash and debris on-site and adjacent public right-of-way.

P15. Minor changes to the project would be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.

P16. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, Developer/Owner shall have an asbestos survey of the proposed site performed by a certified individual. Survey results and notice of the proposed demolition are to be sent to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). No demolition shall be performed without a demolition permit and BAAQMD approval and, if necessary, proper asbestos removal.

PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 5 of 19
P17. The developer shall submit a truck hauling route for demolition, soil, debris and material removal, and construction to the Director of Planning and Inspection for review and approval prior to the issuance of demolition and building permits.

P18. Construction activity not confined within a building shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. weekdays and not permitted on Saturdays and Sundays for projects within 500 feet of a residential use. Construction activity confined within a building shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturdays for projects within 500 feet of a residential use and prohibited on Sundays. Construction activity shall not be allowed on recognized State and Federal holidays.

P19. The project shall comply with the mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Measures and Reporting Program.

P20. In the event historic/prehistoric artifacts or human remains are discovered during ground disturbing activities, the following measures will be implemented: In compliance with State law (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code), in the event human remains are encountered during grading and construction, all work within 25 feet of the find will stop and the Santa Clara County Coroner’s office will be notified. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission to identify the “Most Likely Descendant” (MLD).

The City, in consultation with the MLD, would then prepare a plan for treatment, study and reinternment of the remains.

P21. In compliance with State law (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code), in the event that historical artifacts are found, all work within 50 feet of the find will stop and a qualified archaeologist will examine the find. All significant artifacts and samples recovered during construction would be cataloged and curated by a qualified archaeologist and placed in an appropriate curation facility. The archaeologist must then submit a plan for evaluation of the resource to the City of Santa Clara Planning Division for approval. If the evaluation of the resource concludes that the found resource is eligible for the California Register of Historic Resources, a mitigation plan must be submitted to the City of Santa Clara Planning Division for approval. The mitigation plan must be completed before earthmoving or construction activities can recommence within the designated resource area.

P22. The following HT provisions shall apply to the HRI properties at 906 and 930 Monroe Street to regulate use and maintenance:
a. 18.58.050 Conversion of residential structures to commercial use. b. 18.58.060 Architectural control.
c. 18.58.070 Demolition restriction.

FIRE
F1. Prior to Business Closure, the existing facility(s) must obtain a closure permit from the fire department
F2. Prior to Demolition Permit Issuance, a Phase II environmental assessment is required to be submitted to Community Risk Reduction Division (CRRD) of the fire department for review. If hazards are present that require site mitigation, PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 6 of 19
cleanup, or management of chemical contaminants in soil, soil vapor, or groundwater a separate permit from one of the regulatory agencies below will be required. The type and extent of contamination on site(s) will govern which of the regulatory agencies noted below can supervise the cleanup:
a. Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC);
b. State Water Resources Control Board; or
c. Santa Clara County, Department of Environmental Health.

F3. Prior to Building Permit Issuance, a permit for Construction Safety & Demolition plan shall be submitted approved to the fire department for review and approval in compliance with our Construction Safety & Demolition standard.

F4. Prior to Building Permit Issuance, provide documentation from the City of Santa Clara Water & Sewer Department that the minimum required fire-flow can be met. Fire Department fire-flow will be based on the currently adopted California Fire Code (CFC) as amended. The maximum reduction for the installation of fire sprinklers is twenty-five percent. The most restrictive departments requirement shall apply.

F5. Prior to Building Permit Issuance, a separate construction permit for fire hydrants shall be obtained from the fire department. The required number, location and distribution of public and private fire hydrants for the building will be based on the current adoption of the CFC, Appendix C as amended. The required number of public and private fire hydrants will be based on the fire-flow before the reduction for fire sprinklers in accordance with CFC as amend. Private fire hydrants are required to be spaced around the perimeter of the building at an average spacing be more than 300 feet on center. The design is required to be modified or an alternative materials, design and methods of construction and equipment is required to be obtained prior to Building Permit issuance. The final mitigation measures will be determined at time of submittal, but the project should plan on incorporating a fire service elevator into the design.

F6. Prior to Building Permit Issuance, a five-foot all-weather perimeter pathway around the entire perimeter of the buildings to facilitate firefighter access is required to be incorporated into the Building permit submittal.

F7. Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, a construction permit from the fire department apparatus access roads is required to be submitted for review and approval. Roadways must be provided to comply with all the following requirements:
a. Fire apparatus access roadways shall be provided so that the exterior walls of the first story of the buildings are located not more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. The design is required to be modified or an alternative materials, design and methods of construction and equipment is required to be obtained prior to Building Permit issuance. The final mitigation measures will be determined at time of submittal, but the project should plan on incorporating a fire service elevator into the design.

PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 7 of 19
b. The “minimum” unobstructed vertical clearance shall not be less than 13’- 6” feet.
c. The “minimum” width of aerial roadways for aerial apparatus is 26 feet. d. The minimum inside turning radius shall be 30 feet.
e. The aerial access roadways shall be located a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the protected building.
f. Overhead utility and power lines easements shall not be located over fire apparatus access roads or between the aerial fire apparatus roads and the buildings to avoid the possibility of injury and equipment damage from electrical hazards.
g. Fire apparatus access roadways shall be all-weather surface(s) designed to support a gross vehicle weight of 75,000-pounds.
h. Trees at full development must not exceed 30 feet in height and not impair aerials apparatus operations to sweep opposing sides of a building. Other obstructions such as site lighting, bio-retention, and architectural features are reviewed case-by-case to ensure they do not obstruct aerial and ground ladder access.
i. Traffic control/calming devices are not permitted on any designated fire access roadway unless approved. A separate Fire Department permit is required for any barrier devices installed alone fire department apparatus access roads.
j. All fire department apparatus access roadways on private property are required to “be recorded” with the County of Santa Clara as Emergency Vehicle Access Easements (EVAE’s).

F8. Prior to issuance of the Building Permit, a gate permit is required to obtained.

Openings for access gates located across fire apparatus access roads shall be a minimum of 20 feet of clear width. Gates shall also be provided with a minimum unobstructed vertical clearance of 16-feet. All gates installed on designated fire department access roads must be electrically automatic powered gates. Gates shall be provided with an emergency power or be of a fail-safe design, allowing the gate to be pushed open without the use of special knowledge or equipment.

A Tomar Strobe Switch or 3M Opticom detector shall be installed to control the automatic gate(s) to allow emergency vehicles (e.g., fire, police, ems). Said device shall be mounted at a minimum height of eight to ten feet (8’ - 10’) above grade.

F9. Prior to Building Permit Issuance, design provisions must be made within the Building permit submittal for Emergency Responder Radio Coverage System (ERRCS) equipment, including but not limited to pathway survivability in accordance with Santa Clara Emergency Responder Radio Coverage System Standard.

PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 8 of 19
F10. Prior to the start of construction, roadways and water supplies for fire protection are required to be installed and made serviceable and maintained throughout the course of construction.

F11. Prior to any Certificate of Occupancy Issuance (temporary or permanent), fire-life safety systems installations must be fully installed, functional, and approved. In buildings where an automatic sprinkler system is required, it shall be unlawful to occupy any portion of a building or structure until the automatic sprinkler system installation has been tested and approved. In new buildings of combustible construction where, automatic fire sprinkler systems are required to be installed, the system shall be placed in service as immediately upon the completion of sprinkler pipe installation on each floor level, the piping shall be hydrostatically tested and inspected. After inspection approval from the fire department, each floor level of sprinkler piping shall be connected to the system supply riser and placed into service with all sprinkler heads uncovered. Fire watch is not intended to facilitate occupancy during ongoing construction in a new building.

PARKS & RECREATION
PR1. This memo assumes the Project is a subdivision and the Quimby Act provisions will apply. The project will generate an estimated 130 residents (2.4 persons/household x 54 units). Based on the Quimby Act standard of 3.0 acres/1000 residents, the amount of public parkland required for this Project to mitigate the impact of the new resident demand is approximately 0.3888-acres.

The equivalent fee due in lieu of parkland dedication is therefore $2,725,272.

PR2. The existing three single-family residences on the corner of Monroe Streets and Homestead Road are not included in the calculations as they are not generating any new residents.

PR3. Any in-lieu fees imposed under this Chapter shall be due and payable to the City prior to issuance of a building permit for each dwelling unit. Final calculations will depend upon the actual number and type of units and the mix of parkland dedicated and remaining fee due, at the discretion of the City.

PR4. Dwelling Unit Tax. A dwelling unit tax (DUT) is also due based on the number of units and additional bedrooms per City Code Chapter 3.15. The Project mix includes 17 one-bedroom units, 33 two-bedroom units and 4 three-bedroom units for a total DUT of $1,015
PR5. Calculations may change if the number of units change, if any areas do not conform to the Ordinance and City Code Chapter 17.35, and/or if the fee schedule for new residential development fees due in lieu of parkland dedication changes before this Project is deemed complete by Planning.

POLICE
PD1. PD1. The property should be fenced off during demolition and construction as a safety barrier to the public and deterrent to theft and other crime. Consider not having any screening material on the fence so passing Police Patrol checks will be able to see into the site.

PD2. Address numbers should be a minimum of twelve (12) inches in height for commercial or industrial buildings. Consider illuminated numbers during the hours of darkness, and in a color that is contrasting to the background material.

PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 9 of 19
They shall be clearly visible from the street. Where multiple units or buildings occupy the same property, each unit/building address shall be clearly visible. A monument sign, preferably at all entrances to the property, should be prominently displayed showing all unit/building numbers, addresses, etc. A map is recommended for large complexes with multiple streets or walkways.

PD3. In a development where there is an alley, driveway, etc. providing a rear entrance or access, the address shall be displayed to both the front and rear of the individual buildings. Where an alley, driveway, etc. provided vehicular access, address numbers shall be clearly visible from that access.

PD4. Businesses with rear alley entrance doors shall be numbered with the same address numbers or suite numbers as the front doors. Numbers that are a minimum height of 4” are recommended.

PD5. There shall be positioned near the entrance an illustrative diagram of the complex, which shows the location of the viewer and unit designations within the complex, including separate building designations. This diagram shall be illuminated and should be protected by vandal and weather resistant covers.

PD6. Each distinct unit within the building shall have its address displayed on or directly above both front and rear doors.

PD7. When there is an alley or driveway to the rear of the business or commercial establishment that provides pedestrian or vehicle access, that area should be fenced and locked after hours. A ‘Knox Box’ or key coded system shall be used for police and fire emergency access.

PD8. Landscaping should follow the National Institute of Crime Prevention standards.

That standard describes bushes/shrubs not exceeding 2’ in height at maturity, or maintained at that height, and the canopies of trees should not be lower than 6’ in height. Crime deterrent vegetation is encouraged along the fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows.

PD9. Lighting for the project to be at the IES (Illuminating Engineering Society of North America) standards and include the features listed below: White light source, Pedestrian Scale, Full cut-off or shoebox design, Unbreakable exterior, Tamperproof Housings, Wall mounted lights/10’ high. These features increase natural surveillance, support and/or enhance security camera capabilities, and increase Police Patrol effectiveness.

PD10. Any required enclosure fencing (trash area, utility equipment, etc.) would preferably be see-thru. If for aesthetic reasons prohibit that, the fencing should have a six (6) inch opening along the bottom for clear visibility. Any gates or access doors to these enclosures should be locked.

PD11. If the project includes any benches, these benches should not be longer than 5 feet in length, and should have arm rests at both ends. If the benches are longer than 5 feet in length, there should be a divider (arm rest or similar) in the middle of the bench in addition to the arm rests on both ends. This helps prevent unlawful lodging and/or skateboarding. Another option to benches could be cubes, knee walls, or other creative types of seating possibilities.

PD12. The developer should install skate stoppers on any low clearance wall of 36 inches in height or lower to prevent vandalism/damage to the wall from skateboarding or similar activities. If there is outdoor seating associated with a PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 10 of 19
restaurant or similar business which is near vehicle parking stalls, the outdoor space will be designed to ensure the safety of the public from possible vehicular related incidents.

PD13. All exterior doors should be adequately illuminated at all hours with their own light source.

PD14. All construction of dwelling units shall conform to the requirements of the Uniform Building Security Code as adopted by the City of Santa Clara City Council.

PD15. All elevators should be well lit and equipped with a security mirror to provide interior and exterior visibility prior to entry or exit.

PD16. Consider convex mirrors for elevator cabs and at stairwell landings in order to enhance natural surveillance for the user of the elevator or stairs. It is highly desirable to design an elevator shaft and cab to be transparent, making occupants of the cab visible from the outside. All elevators should be well lit and equipped with a security mirror to provide interior & exterior visibility prior to entry or exit.

PD17. Other line of sight obstructions (including recessed doorways, alcoves, etc.) should be avoided on building exterior walls and interior hallways.

PD18. All business or commercial establishments, of whatever nature, should have an electronic intruder alarm system installed. The system should cover the interior and perimeter of structures determined to be a value target. Also, consideration should be given to exterior areas that are or contain value targets, such as a product display lot, company vehicle parking area, etc.

PD19. The installation and use of interior and exterior security cameras and recording devices is highly encouraged.

PD20. Exterior stairs shall be open style whenever structurally possible. The stairs should be well lit.

PD21. “White” light meeting the IES standard should be considered. There should be no “dark” areas inside the structure.

PD22. The interior of the parking structure should be painted a light, highly reflective color. This increases the natural lighting available and can help prevent dark areas that attract criminal activity.

PD23. All entrances to the parking areas (structure, surface, subterranean, etc.) shall be posted with appropriate signage to discourage trespassing, unauthorized parking, etc. (See California Vehicle Code section 22658(a) for guidance) PD24. Alcoves and other visual obstructions that might constitute a hiding place should be eliminated whenever structurally possible. Pillars, columns, and other open construction should be considered over a solid wall design.

PD25. Consider storage, maintenance, and trash rooms within the parking garage having doors which cannot be locked from the inside and that close and lock quickly and automatically upon exit.

PD26. A Coded Entry System is required for police access to enclosed parking lots and gated communities. This can be accomplished with a coded key pad system or the Police Department Knox Box key system. We understand security is a prime concern for the tenants of the project, which necessitates some sort of secure building and admittance process. By having either of these secure access systems for law enforcement, it will allow us to better respond to emergency PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 11 of 19
situations should they arise in the development. Examples of these systems can be reviewed at the following projects: 2585 El Camino Real (Coded key pad access) and 3555 Monroe Street (Knox box key access)
PD27. Public Safety Radio Systems Penetration Guidelines have been established by the city of Santa Clara Communications Department for radio signal penetration during emergencies. The developer is advised that the project may be required to install equipment for adequate radio coverage for the City Of Santa Clara Radio communications System, including but not limited to Police & Fire emergency services. The developer should contact the director of communications at (408) 615-557 (for high rises).

PD28. When in the opinion of the fire code official, a new structure obstructs the line of sight of emergency radio communications to existing buildings or to any other locations, the developer of the structure shall provide and install the radio retransmission equipment necessary to restore communications capabilities. The equipment shall be located in an approved space or area within the new structure.

PD29. Applicant shall contact the Santa Clara Police Department ‘Permits” unit (408- 615-4868) for regulated activity special licensing requirements.

PD30. Applicant shall contact the Santa Clara Police Department ‘Intelligence” unit (408-615-4849) for Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) licensing review.

PD31. The business shall undergo a 6 month and 1 year review, including a check for ABC violations and police service calls.

PD32. Applicant shall contact the Santa Clara Police Department ‘Intelligence” unit (408-615-4849) for entertainment permit requirements.

PD33. All business or commercial establishments, of whatever nature, should have a comprehensive internal security plan, tailored to the specific use. This should include, but not limited to, employee security during working hours, after hours security, disaster preparation, etc. For retail uses, especially where there is cash on hand, robbery and cash security protocols should be established. Applicants are encouraged to contact the Santa Clara Police Department’s Community Services Unit (408-615-4859) for assistance.

PUBLIC WORKS

ENGINEERING
E1. Obtain site clearance through Public Works Department prior to issuance of Building Permit. Site clearance will require payment of applicable development fees. Other requirements may be identified for compliance during the site clearance process. Contact Public Works Department at (408) 615-3000 for further information.

E2. All work within the public right-of-way and/or public easement, which is to be performed by the Developer/Owner, the general contractor, and all subcontractors shall be submitted within a Single Encroachment Permit to be reviewed and issued by the City Public Works Department. Issuance of the Encroachment Permit and payment of all appropriate fees shall be completed PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 12 of 19
prior to commencement of work, and all work under the permit shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permit.

E3. Submit public improvement/encroachment permit plans prepared in accordance with City Public Works Department procedures which provide for the installation of public improvements directly to the Public Works Department. Plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to approval and recordation of final map and/or issuance of building permits.

E4. The sanitary sewer (SS) discharge information (i.e., building use, square footage, point of connection to the public system, and 24-hour average and peak SS flow graphs for the peak day, showing average daily and peak daily SS flows) submitted by the developer was added 3/31/2021 to the City’s Sanitary Sewer Hydraulic Model (SSHM) to determine if there is enough SS conveyance capacity in the SS trunk system to accommodate the proposed development. The SSHM output indicates that there should be enough SS conveyance capacity to accommodate the proposed development. The SSHM output may change based on pending development applications and future projects. The SSHM output does not guarantee or in any way reserve or hold SS conveyance capacity until developer has Final Approval for the project. For purposes of this condition, “Final Approval” shall mean the final vote of the City Council necessary for all entitlements to be approved, unless a legal challenge is brought to the Council decisions, in which case the Final Approval shall mean the final disposition of the legal challenge.

E5. Developer shall provide a complete storm drain study for the 10-year and 100- year storm events. The grading plans shall include the overland release for the 100-year storm event and any localized flooding areas. System improvements, if needed, will be at Developer’s expense.

E6. Sanitary sewer and storm drain mains and laterals shall be outside the drip line of mature trees or ten (10) feet clear of the tree trunk, whichever is greater, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

E7. Provide root barriers when the drip line of the mature trees covers the sidewalk.

Root barriers for sidewalk protection shall be 16' long or extend to drip line of the mature tree, whichever is greater, and be 1.5' deep, and centered on trees. Root barriers for curb and gutter protection shall be 16' long or extend to drip line of the mature tree, whichever is greater, and be 2’ deep, and centered on trees.

E8. Damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk within the public right-of-way along property’s frontage shall be repaired or replaced (to the nearest score mark) in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer or his designee. The extents of said repair or replacement within the property frontage shall be at the discretion of the City Engineer or his designee.

PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 13 of 19
E9. Dedicate, as needed, on-site easements for new sidewalk, and any other new utilities by means of subdivision map or approved instrument at time of development and pay applicable processing fee.

E10. If requested, Developer/property owner shall prepare and submit for City approval a maintenance plan for all sidewalk, curb and gutter, landscaping and irrigation system improvements installed within the public right-of-way prior to encroachment permit issuance. Such plan shall include at a minimum, maintenance requirements for trees and shrubs, in acknowledgement of developer’s/property owner’s obligation under Chapter 12.30 and 17.15.

E11. After City Council approval of the Tentative Map, submit the Subdivision Map, prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor or a Registered Civil Engineer with Land Surveyor privileges to the Engineering Department. The submittal shall include a title report, closure calculations, and all appropriate fees.

E12. Entire width of Homestead Road along the project frontage shall be slurry sealed with digouts. Entire width of Monroe Street and Franklin Street along the project frontage shall be 2” grind and overlayed with digouts. If the encroachment permit for the Project’s off-site improvements is not submitted within two (2) years of Final Approval for the Project, the required pavement treatment is subject to revision per the City's pavement program recommendations at the time of encroachment permit issuance. For purposes of this condition, “Final Approval” shall mean the final vote of the City Council necessary for all entitlements to be approved, unless a legal challenge is brought to the Council decisions, in which case the Final Approval shall mean the final disposition of the legal challenge.

Refer to https://www.santaclaraca.gov/our-city/departments-g-z/publicworks/maintenance-operations/street-maintenance/pavement-preservationordinance for more information.

E13. Visual obstructions over three feet in height will not be allowed within the driver's sight triangle near driveways and intersections in order to allow an unobstructed view of oncoming traffic.

E14. On-street parking shall not be counted toward on-site parking requirements.

E15. All proposed driveways shall be per City Standard ST- 8 for Lot 1.

E16. All proposed driveways shall be per City Standard ST-5 for Lots 2 and 3.

E17. Provide pedestrian ADA walkways from proposed buildings to public sidewalk and parking areas.

E18. Provide a 10’ min. sidewalk with 5’ foot planter strip along Monroe new building frontage.

E19. Provide 5’ minimum sidewalk along Homestead and Franklin frontages.

E20. Unused driveways in the public right-of-way shall be replaced with City standard curb, gutter, and sidewalk per City Standard Detail ST-12.

PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 14 of 19
E21. For current proposed retail, restaurant, and housing units, the following minimum bicycle facilities shall be provided at the main entrance and/or high visible areas:

E22. 61 housing units: 20 Class I Bike Locker spaces and 4 Class II Bike Rack spaces E23. 2,000 sq. ft. retail: 1 Class I Bike Locker space per 30 employees and 4 Class II bike Rack spaces
E24. Provide loading/unloading zone on-site. No loading zone will be allowed onstreet.

E25. Provide trash pick-up and drop areas on-site.

E26. Maintain existing roadway signage along Monroe, Franklin, and Homestead project frontages.

E27. Provide one ADA compliant curb ramp at the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Franklin Street and two ADA compliant curb ramps at the southwest corner of Homestead Road and Monroe Street.

E28. Maintain the existing 5-foot Class II bicycle lane on Monroe along entire frontage.

E29. Reconstruct traffic signal at the Monroe/Homestead intersection to bring signal, poles, and underground infrastructure to current ADA, City and Caltrans Standards. This will include installing a leading pedestrian interval crossing Monroe Street, countdown timer, Bluetooth velocity reader, CCTV, and an accessible pedestrian signal.

E30. All proposed traffic striping, messages, and symbols shall be thermoplastic.

E31. Proposed curb radius at Monroe/Homestead intersection is too wide. Curb radius at this intersection should be 15 to 20 feet maximum.

E32. Enhanced crosswalk markings as shown in Figure 3B-17 (CA) contained in the CA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) and shown in Figure 1 within the memorandum by Hexagon Consultants titled “Pedestrian Crossing Study for Crosswalk Enhancements on Monroe Street in Conjunction with the Proposed Mixed-Use Project at 906 Monroe Street in Santa Clara, California” dated April 1, 2021 shall be installed at the Franklin and Monroe intersection. Bulb-outs shall be installed at the intersections of Monroe/Homestead and Monroe/Franklin. They shall have a gentle “S” curve and no sharp corner/curve and straight line allowed. Bulb-outs on Monroe side shall not encroach into the existing bike lane. Minimum bike lane width is 5’.

Gutter pan shall not be used as part of the bike lane width.

E33. Bike lane striping/messages destroyed/damaged at the proposed bulb-outs at Monroe/Franklin and Monroe/Homestead shall be replaced with thermoplastic striping/messages.

E34. Per Santa Clara Technical Guidelines ST-8 drawing, the maximum width allowed for residential/commercial driveways is 30 feet. The revised site plan shows the driveway on Franklin as 48’ feet wide, please revise to meet ST-8 standards.

PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 15 of 19
E35. The project shall comply with all requirements contained within the Downtown Precise Plan, once approved by City Council.

STREETS DIVISION
Landscape
L1. Include City of Santa Clara Tree Preservation/City Arborist specifications on all improvement plans.

L2. No cutting of any part of public or private trees, including roots, shall be done without securing prior approval of the City Arborist. Tree trimming/removal shall be done in accordance to the City of Santa Clara Tree Preservation/City Arborist specifications and with direct supervision of a certified arborist (Certification of International Society of Arboriculture).

L3. Identified existing mature trees to be maintained. Prepare a tree protection plans for review and approval by the City of Santa Clara prior to any demolition, grading or other earthwork in the vicinity of existing trees on the site.

L4. Tree replacement ratio shall be 2:1 with minimum box size replacements. If project can’t meet the 2:1 replacement ratio, in-lieu fees must be paid prior to issuance of building permit.

Solid Waste
. The applicant shall complete and provide the Post-Construction Solid Waste Generation Estimation and Collection Form, which includes the estimation of trash and recycling materials generated from the project. Use the City’s Solid Waste Guidelines for New and Redevelopment Projects as specified by the development type. Contact the Public Works Department at [email protected] or (408) 615-3080 for more information.

SW2. The applicant shall provide a site plan showing all proposed locations of solid waste containers, chutes, compactors, trash enclosures and trash staging areas.

The site plan shall show the route or access for trash and recycling collectors (trucks) including vertical clearance, turning radius and street/alley widths. All plans shall comply with the City’s Solid Waste Guidelines.

SW3. For projects that involve construction, demolition or renovation of 5,000 square feet or more, the applicant shall comply with City Code Section 8.25.285 and recycle or divert at least sixty five percent (65%) of materials generated for discard by the project during demolition and construction activities. No building, demolition, or site development permit shall be issued unless and until applicant has submitted a construction and demolition debris materials check-off list.

Applicant shall create a Waste Management Plan and submit, for approval, a Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Report through the City’s online tracking tool at http://santaclara.wastetracking.com/.

SW4. Prior to obtaining a Temporary or Final Certificate of Occupancy, individual weight tickets for all materials generated for discard or reuse by the project during demolition and construction activities shall be uploaded to Green Halo and submitted for review and approval by Environmental Services. At a minimum two (2) weeks review time is required.

PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 16 of 19
SW5. This project is subject to the City’s Accumulation, Transportation and Disposal of Solid Waste Ordinance (Chapter 8.25 of the Municipal Codes), which requires the handling and disposal of waste by authorized service haulers. Insert the General Notes for the Construction & Demolition (C&D) Waste Management into construction plans in accordance with the City’s municipal codes prior to the issuance of a Building or Grading permit. Provide the Green Halo waste online tracking number to Building staff prior to the issuance of a demolition or building permit.

SW6. This property falls within the City’s exclusive franchise hauling area. The applicant is required to use the City’s exclusive franchise hauler and rate structure for any hired debris boxes. Prior to the issuance of a Public Works clearance, the project applicant shall complete and sign the Construction and Demolition (C&D) / Waste Management Rules and Regulations Form.

SW7. All refuse from all residential, commercial, industrial and institutional properties within the city shall be collected at least once a week, unless otherwise approved in writing (SCCC 8.25.120). Garbage service level required for residential developments (single-family and multi-family) as well as motels and hotels shall be no less than twenty (20) gallons per unit. All project shall submit to the Public Works Department the preliminary refuse service level assessment for approval.

Stormwater
Prior to City’s issuance of Building or Grading Permits, the applicant shall develop a Final Stormwater Management Plan, update the C.3 Data Form, the Special Project Narratives and Worksheet (as appropriate), and an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan.
 Applicant to provide an updated Special Projects Narrative that identifies TOD credit as 45%.

ST2. The Final Stormwater Management Plan and all associated calculations shall be reviewed and certified by a qualified 3rd party consultant from the SCVURPPP List of Qualified Consultants, and a 3rd party review letter shall be submitted with the Plan.

ST3. For project that disturbs a land area of one acre or more, the applicant shall provide a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) with WDID number for coverage under the State Construction General Permit. Active projects with NOI will be inspected by the City once per month during the wet season (October – April).

ST4. The applicant shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) into construction plans and incorporate post-construction water runoff measures into project plans. Include the SCVURPPP Countywide Construction BMPs Plan Sheet with the plans.

ST5. Include the C.3 Treatment Facilities Construction Notes on the Improvement Plans and/or Stormwater Control Plans.

ST6. During the construction phase, all stormwater control measures shall be inspected for conformance to approved plans by a qualified 3rd party consultant from the SCVURPPP List of Qualified Consultants, and a 3rd party concurrence letter on the C.3 facilities construction shall be submitted to the Public Works Department. The City reserves the right to review the 3rd party inspection reports on the C.3 stormwater facilities installation.

PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 17 of 19
ST7. Applicant shall install biotreatment soil media that meets the minimum specifications as set forth in the SCVURPPP C.3 Stormwater Handbook. If percolation rate test of the biotreatment soil mix is not performed on-site, a certification letter from the supplier verifying that the soil meets the specified mix (the date of such document shall not be older than 3 months).

ST8. As-Built drawing shall be submitted to the Public Works Department. Include C.3 Stormwater Treatment Facilities Construction general notes on the improvement plans.

ST9. Permeable Pavement, Media Filter vaults, Interceptor Trees and Trash Full Capture Devices shall be inspected by a third-party reviewer and/or manufacturer representative for conformance with the details and specifications. If necessary, percolation test shall be performed to ensure proper installation. A map displaying the number, location and details of full trash capture devices shall be prepared as an attachment to the Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement with the City.

ST10. Stormwater treatment facilities must be designed, installed, and maintained to achieve the site design measures throughout their life in accordance to the SCVRUPPP C.3 Stormwater Handbook (Chapter 6 and Appendix C).

ST11. The property owner shall enter into an Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement with the City for all installed stormwater treatment measures and full trash capture devices in perpetuity. Applicants should contact Public Works Dept. - Environmental Services at (408) 615-3080 or [email protected] for assistance completing the Agreement. For more information and to download the most recent version of the O&M Agreement, visit the City’s stormwater resources website at http://santaclaraca.gov/stormwater. Inspection of permeable pavement, media filter vaults and full trash capture devices is to be done annually by December 31 of each year.

ST12. Any site design measures used to reduce the size of stormwater treatment measures shall not be installed for the project without the written approval from the City, installing the corresponding resizing of other stormwater treatment measures and an amendment of the property’s O&M Agreement.

ST13. Developer shall install an appropriate stormwater pollution prevention message such as “No Dumping – Flows to Bay” on any storm drains located on private property.

ST14. Interior floor drains shall be plumbed to the sanitary sewer system and not connected to the City’s storm drain system.

ST15. Floor drains within trash enclosures shall be plumbed to the sanitary sewer system and not connected to the City’s storm drain system.

ST16. All outdoor equipment and materials storage areas shall be covered and/or bermed, or otherwise designed to limit the potential for runoff to contact pollutants.

ST17. Decorative and recreational water features such as fountains, pools, and ponds shall be designed and constructed to drain to the sanitary sewer system only.

ST18. The use of architectural copper is discouraged. If such material is used, all wastewater generated by the installation, cleaning, treating, or washing of the PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 18 of 19
surface of copper architectural features, including copper roofs, shall not be discharged to the City’s storm drain system.

SILICON VALLEY POWER
SVP1. Townhome meters are being served within the same electrical room as the other building or customer owned conduits and cables will need to run to an SVP pull box along the frontage.

SVP2. Property Lines are being removed as shown in tentative parcel map.

SVP3. Pole 37C11 is to remain. Will need a 15-20’ lead down guy & anchor for this pole.

SVP4. Pole with light can be remove once pole 37C12 is removed. The area/street lighting is the projects responsibility to maintain while new SVP street lighting system can be installed/energized per detailed design.

SVP5. Offsite duct banks crossing Franklin road & Monroe road shall be designed, installed and paid for by the developer.

SVP6. All streetlight, secondary, and UE (Fiber) systems to be designed during detailed design.

SVP7. Clearances: (Make sure job notes do not conflict with SVP clearance requirements)
a. EQUIPMENT
i. Ten (10) foot minimum clearance is required in front of equipment access doors. (UG1000 sheet 11)
ii. Five (5) foot minimum clearance from pad is required on sides without equipment access doors. (UG1000 sheet 11)
iii. Eighteen (18) foot minimum width, shall be provided and maintained on one side of the equipment pad to allow an electric dept. line truck to drive up next to the pad for installation and maintenance of equipment. (UG1000 Sheet 11).
iv. Barrier pipes are required only on sides accessible to vehicles. (UG1000 Sheet 12).

1. Thirty (30) inches from side of equipment sides.

2. Forty Eight (48) inches in front of access doors.
a. Barrier Pipes in front of access doors shall be
removable.
b. CONDUITS
i. Five (5) foot minimum longitudinal clearance between new conduits or piping systems (open trench installation) and any existing or proposed SVP conduit system. This is for longitudinal. (UG1250 sheet 5)
ii. Twelve (12) inch minimum vertical clearance between new conduit/pipes installed perpendicular to existing SVP conduits for open trench installations. (UG1000 sheet 36, UG1250 Sheet 6) iii. Three (3) foot six (6) inches clearance is required from poles for open trench installation. Exceptions are for riser conduit. (UG1250 Sheet 7)
PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 19 of 19
iv. Three (3) foot minimum clearance is required between sign posts, barrier pipes or bollards, fence posts, and other similar structures. ( UG1250 sheet 10).
v. Five (5) foot minimum from new splice boxes, pull boxes, manholes, vaults, or similar subsurface facilities. (UG1000 sheet 8) vi. Five (5) foot minimum clearance from walls, footings, retaining wall, landscape planter, tree root barrier or other subsurface wall or structure. (UG1250 sheet 9).
vii. Five (5) foot minimum clearance is required between fire hydrant thrust block. The thrust block extends 5’ foot on either side of the fire hydrant in line with the radial water pipe connected to the hydrant.
c. VAULTS/MANHOLES
i. Ten (10) foot minimum clearance is required between adjacent Vaults or Manholes.
ii. Five (5) foot minimum clearance is required between adjacent conduits.
iii. Minimum 36” from face of curb, or bollards required. d. Poles (Electrolier, Guy Stub poles, service clearance poles, selfsupporting steel poles and lighting poles.) i. Three (3) foot six (6) inches clearance is required from poles for open trench installation. Exceptions are for riser conduit. (UG1250 Sheet 7)
e. Guy Anchors
i. Five (5) foot minimum clearance is required between center of anchor line and any excavation area. (UG1250 sheet 15). f. Trees
i. OH 1230 for Overhead Lines
ii. SD 1235 for Tree Planting Requirements near UG Electric Facilities SVP8. Reference listed SVP standards for clearances.
a. Installation of Underground Substructures by Developers b. UG1250 – Encroachment Permit Clearances from Electric Facilities c. UG0339 – Remote Switch Pad
d. OH1230 – Tree Clearances From Overhead Electric Lines e. SD1235 – Tree Planting Requirements Near Underground Electric Facilities
SVP9. Prior to submitting any project for Electric Department review, applicant shall provide a site plan showing all existing utilities, structures, easements and trees. Applicant shall also include a “Load Survey” form showing all current and proposed electric loads. A new customer with a load of 500KVA or greater or 100 residential units will have to fill out a “Service Investigation Form” and submit this form to the Electric Planning Department for review by the Electric Planning Engineer. Silicon Valley Power will do exact design of required substructures after plans are submitted for building permits.

SVP10. The Developer shall provide and install electric facilities per Santa Clara City Code chapter 17.15.210.

PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 20 of 19
SVP11. Electric service shall be underground. See Electric Department Rules and Regulations for available services.

SVP12. Installation of underground facilities shall be in accordance with City of Santa Clara Electric Department standard UG-1000, latest version, and Santa Clara City Code chapter 17.15.050.

SVP13. Underground service entrance conduits and conductors shall be “privately” owned, maintained, and installed per City Building Inspection Division Codes.

Electric meters and main disconnects shall be installed per Silicon Valley Power Standard MS-G7, Rev. 2.

SVP14. The developer shall grant to the City, without cost, all easements and/or right of way necessary for serving the property of the developer and for the installation of utilities (Santa Clara City Code chapter 17.15.110).

SVP15. If the “legal description” (not “marketing description”) of the units is condominium or apartment, then all electric meters and services disconnects shall be grouped at one location, outside of the building or in a utility room accessible directly from the outside. If they are townhomes or single-family residences, then each unit shall have it’s own meter, located on the structure. A double hasp locking arrangement shall be provided on the main switchboard door(s). Utility room door(s) shall have a double hasp locking arrangement or a lock box shall be provided. Utility room door(s) shall not be alarmed.

SVP16. If transformer pads are required, City Electric Department requires an area of 17’ x 16’-2”, which is clear of all utilities, trees, walls, etc. This area includes a 5’-0” area away from the actual transformer pad. This area in front of the transformer may be reduced from a 8’-0” apron to a 3’-0”, providing the apron is back of a 5’-0” min. wide sidewalk. Transformer pad must be a minimum of 10’- 0 from all doors and windows, and shall be located next to a level, drivable area that will support a large crane or truck.

SVP17. All trees, existing and proposed, shall be a minimum of five (5) feet from any existing or proposed Electric Department facilities. Existing trees in conflict will have to be removed. Trees shall not be planted in PUE’s or electric easements.

SVP18. Any relocation of existing electric facilities shall be at Developer’s expense.

SVP19. Electric Load Increase fees may be applicable.

SVP20. The developer shall provide the City, in accordance with current City standards and specifications, all trenching, backfill, resurfacing, landscaping, conduit, junction boxes, vaults, street light foundations, equipment pads and subsurface housings required for power distribution, street lighting, and signal communication systems, as required by the City in the development of frontage and on-site property. Upon completion of improvements satisfactory to the City, the City shall accept the work. Developer shall further install at his cost the service facilities, consisting of service wires, cables, conductors, and associated equipment necessary to connect a customer to the electrical supply system of and by the City. After completion of the facilities installed by developer, the City shall furnish and install all cable, switches, street lighting poles, luminaries, transformers, meters, and other equipment that it deems necessary for the betterment of the system (Santa Clara City Code chapter 17.15.210 (2)).

PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 21 of 19
SVP21. Electrical improvements (including underground electrical conduits along frontage of properties) may be required if any single non-residential private improvement valued at $200,000 or more or any series of non-residential private improvements made within a three-year period valued at $200,000 or more (Santa Clara City Code Title 17 Appendix A (Table III)).

SVP22. Non-Utility Generator equipment shall not operate in parallel with the electric utility, unless approved and reviewed by the Electric Engineering Division. All switching operations shall be “Open-Transition-Mode”, unless specifically authorized by SVP Electric Engineering Division. A Generating Facility Interconnection Application must be submitted with building permit plans.

Review process may take several months depending on size and type of generator. No interconnection of a generation facility with SVP is allowed without written authorization from SVP Electric Engineering Division.

SVP23. Encroachment permits will not be signed off by Silicon Valley Power until Developers Work substructure construction drawing has been completed.

SVP24. All SVP-owned equipment is to be covered by an Underground Electric Easement (U.G.E.E.) This is different than a PUE. Only publically-owned dry utilities can be in a UGEE. Other facilities can be in a joint trench configuration with SVP, separated by a 1’ clearance, providing that they are constructed simultaneously with SVP facilities. See UG 1000 for details.

SVP25. Proper clearance must be maintained from all SVP facilities, including a 5’ clearance from the outer wall of all conduits. This is in addition to any UGEE specified for the facilities. Contact SVP before making assumptions on any clearances for electric facilities.

SVP26. Transformers and Switch devices can only be located outdoors. These devices MAY be placed 5’ from an outside building wall, provided that the building wall in that area meets specific requirements. (See UG 1000 document for specifics) EXAMPLE: If there are any doors, windows, vents, overhangs or other wall openings within 5’ of the transformer, on either side, then the transformer MUST be 10’ or more away from the building. These clearances are to be assumed to be clear horizontally 5’ in either direction and vertically to the sky.

SVP27. All existing SVP facilities, onsite or offsite, are to remain unless specifically addressed by SVP personnel by separate document. It is the Developers responsibility to maintain all clearances from equipment and easements.

Developer to contact SVP outside of the PCC process for clear definitions of these clearance requirements. Developer should not assume that SVP will be removing any existing facilities without detailed design drawings from SVP indicating potential removals. Simply indicating that SVP facilities are to be removed or relocated on conceptual plans does not imply that this action has been approved by SVP.

SVP28. SVP does not utilize any sub-surface (below grade) devices in its system. This includes transformers, switches, etc.

SVP29. All interior meter rooms at ground level are to have direct, outside access through only ONE door. Interior electric rooms must be enclosed in a dedicated electric room and cannot be in an open warehouse or office space.

SVP30. High Rise Metering and Multi-Floor Infrastructure Requirements PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 22 of 19
a. Refer to UG0250 – High Density Residential Metering Requirements b. Refer to FO-1901 – Fiber Optic Splicing and Testing Methods SVP31. SVP’s largest 120/208V transformer is 750KVA.

SVP32. SVP’s largest 277/480V transformer is 2000KVA.

SVP33. In the case of podium-style construction, all SVP facilities and conduit systems must be located on solid ground (aka “real dirt”), and cannot be supported on parking garage ceilings or placed on top of structures.

SVP34. Applicant is advised to contact SVP (CSC Electric Department) to obtain specific design and utility requirements that are required for building permit review/approval submittal. Please provide a site plan to Leonard Buttitta at 408-615-6620 to facilitate plan review.

WATER & SEWER
W1. Recycled Water Use: Pursuant to Chapter 13.15, Water, Article IV. Regulation of Recycled Water Service and Use, of the Municipal Code, the project is required to use recycled water for all non-potable uses where recycled water is made available and where provided for by Recycled Water regulations. This project is required to extend and connect to the City’s existing Recycled Water System.

W2. Potable Water Redundancy: For all onsite industrial water use that requires uninterrupted service, the project shall provide a potable water back-up supply source that complies with all recycled water separation requirements.

W3. Recycled Water Design: Each Recycled Water land use (irrigation, dualplumbing, cooling system, industrial processes, etc.) shall have a separate metered service connection to the main. Applicant shall verify separations between all potable/fire lines and recycled water lines, pipe type, pipe depths, equipment types, warning lids, tags and signs.

W4. On-site Recycled Water Construction: Construction and installation of all on-site recycled water system equipment shall not begin until the Compliance Division of Water and Sewer Utilities has approved the on-site recycled water design.

Please note on-site designs are generally not the same as the Building Permit plans. On-site recycled water plans require SBWR and California State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water signatures for final approval.

W5. On-site Recycled Water Inspection: Inspections are required at all on-site recycled water systems being installed prior to backfilling trenches or cover in walls and ceilings. Request a recycled water inspection by email [email protected] or call (408) 615-2002. Please provide the site location, SBWR project ID, and date and time preferences. These inspections are in addition to the Building Permit inspections. a. Need to verify separations between all potable/fire lines and recycled water lines, pipe type, pipe depths, equipment types, warning lids, tags and signs.

W6. Recycled Water Main: The applicant shall install a new 12" DIP pipe recycled water main from the point of connection point on Madison and extend it to the site.

PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 23 of 19
W7. Encroachment Permit: Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit an encroachment permit application and design plans for construction of water utilities that comply with the latest edition of the Water & Sewer Utilities Water Service and Use Rules and Regulations, Water System Notes, and Water Standard Details and Specifications. In addition, prior to the City's issuance of Occupancy, the applicant shall construct all public water utilities per the approved plans. The Water & Sewer Utilities will inspect all public water utility installations and all other improvements encroaching public water utilities.

W8. Utility Design Plans: Utility Design Plans shall indicate the pipe material and the size of existing water, recycled water and sewer main(s). The plans shall show the nearest existing fire hydrant and the two nearest existing water main line gate valves near the project area. The plans shall show meter and backflow configurations to scale and per City of Santa Clara Water & Sewer Utilities Standard Details. Note that all new water meters and backflow prevention devices shall be located behind the sidewalk in a landscape area. Fire hydrants should be located two feet behind monolithic sidewalk if sidewalk is present; two feet behind face of curb if no sidewalk is present, per City Std Detail 18. The plans shall provide the profile section details for utilities crossing water, sewer, or recycled water mains to ensure a 12” minimum vertical clearance is maintained.

W9. Utility Separations: Applicant shall adhere to and provide a note indicating that all horizontal and vertical clearances comply with State and local regulations. The applicant shall maintain a minimum 12” of vertical clearance at water service crossing with other utilities, and all required minimum horizontal clearances from water services: 10' from sanitary sewer utilities, 10’ from recycled water utilities, 8' from storm drain utilities, 5' from fire and other water utilities, 3' from abandoned water services, 5' from gas and electric utilities, and 5’ from the edge of the propose or existing driveway. For sanitary sewer, water, and recycled water utilities, the applicant shall maintain a minimum horizontal clearance of 10' from existing and proposed trees. If applicant installs tree root barriers, clearance from tree reduces to 5' (clearance must be from the edge of tree root barrier to edge of water facilities). No structures (fencing, foundation, biofiltration swales, etc.) allowed over sanitary sewer, potable water and/or recycled water utilities and easements.

W10. Separate Services: Applicant shall submit plans showing proposed water, recycled water, sanitary sewer, and fire services connected to a public main in the public right-of-way to the satisfaction of the Director of Water & Sewer Utilities. Different types of water and recycled water use (domestic, irrigation, fire) shall be served by separate water services, each separately tapped at the water main. Tapping on existing fire service line(s) is prohibited. Approved backflow prevention device(s) are required on all potable water services.

W11. City Standard Meters and Backflows: All proposed meters and backflows for all water services shall meet the current City of Santa Clara Water & Sewer Utilities Standard Details. Plans shall show meter and backflow configurations to scale.

W12. Existing Services: The applicant must indicate the disposition of all existing water and sewer services and mains on the plans. If the existing services will not be used, then the applicant shall properly abandon these services to the main per PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 24 of 19
Water & Sewer Utilities standards and install a new service to accommodate the water needs of the project. The applicant shall bear the cost of any relocation or abandonment of existing Water Department facilities required for project construction to the satisfaction of the Director of Water and Sewer Utilities.

W13. Fats, Oil and Grease (FOG): All food service land uses conducting commercial cooking operations including dishwashing activities and equipment cleaning that generate grease-laden wastewater are subject to review from the Water and Sewer Utilities Department, for FOG Control and grease interceptor installation requirements. All food service projects are required to have an approved stamp from the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health before plans can be accepted for review. Contact Compliance Division of the Water and Sewer Utilities at (408) 615-2002 for a Food Service Checklist to initiate the process. Items to address include: future maintenance agreements, identification of proposed plumbing and equipment, calculation for proposed grease control devise(s), identification of proposed grease control device(s), and waste/recycling/tallow storage.

W14. On-Site Storm Drain Treatment: Prior to issuance of Building Permit, the applicant shall submit plans showing any onsite storm water treatment system.

The plan shall include a section detail of the treatment system. No water, sewer, or recycled water facilities shall be located within 5-feet of any storm water treatment system.

W15. Water Usage: Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall provide documentation of water usage so the Water Division can verify the appropriate size of all proposed water meters. Please note that if the existing water services are incapable of supplying the water needs to the site, the existing services shall be abandoned, and new separate dedicated water services shall be provided for each use (domestic and irrigation).

W16. Landscaping: All the landscaping for the project shall comply with the California Water Conservation in Landscaping Act, Government Code Section 65591 et. seq. All plants shall be California native, non-invasive, low water-using or moderate water-using. High water-using plants and nonfunctional turf are prohibited.

W17. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit plan details for all water features (including but not limited to fountains and ponds) designed to include provisions for operating the system without City potable water supply and capable of being physically disconnected from source of potable water supply during City declared water conservation periods, to the satisfaction of the Director of the Water & Sewer Utilities. Decorative water features may be permanently connected to the City’s recycled water supply.

W18. Easements: Prior to City’s issuance of Building or Grading Permits, the applicant shall provide a dedicated water utility easement around the backflow prevention device onsite. The water utility easement for the water services and all other public water appurtenances shall be a minimum 15 feet wide and be adjacent to the public right-of-way without overlapping any public utility easement.

Additionally, the applicant shall submit plans defining existing easements so PLN2020-00518 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project
Planning Commission Hearing May,24 2023 25 of 19
Water Division can verify if there are any conflicts with proposed easements and water utilities.

W19. Underground Fire Permit: Prior to issuance of Building Permits, applicant shall submit an underground fire permit unless otherwise waived by the Fire Department. If fire flow information is needed, applicant shall coordinate with Water and Sewer Utilities Department, for fire flow information at (408) 615-2000.

A dedicated fire service line, with an approved backflow prevention device, shall be used for on-site fire hydrants. Fire service lines required for commercial and industrial use shall be sized appropriately per fire flow demand and code requirements.

W20. Record Drawings: Upon completion of construction and prior to the City’s issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall provide "as-built" drawings of the public water utility infrastructure prepared by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the Director of Water & Sewer Utilities Department.

W21. Water Shortage Response Actions: Pursuant to the City of Santa Clara’s Urban Water Management Plan, during times of drought or water shortage, the City implements water shortage response actions in accordance with the level of water shortage declared. All construction activities and all new irrigation connections are subject to the Water Shortage Response Actions in effect at the time of construction and connection of the irrigation service.

Water Shortage Response Actions for Stage 2 and higher include water use restrictions that limit the use of potable water such as:
a. prohibiting the installation of new potable water irrigation services. new irrigation connections, construction, and dust control. b. restrict the use of potable water used for construction and dust control if recycled water is available.

This project is subject to all the requirements and restrictions of the Water Shortage Response Actions in place or adopted during the duration of the project. For more information, visit the City of Santa Clara Water & Sewer Utilities website at www.santaclaraca.gov/waterconservation.
________________________________________________________________________________ PLN22-00390 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project Page 1 of 2 Planning Commission Hearing May 24, 2023

CONDITIONS OF VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP APPROVAL 950 MONROE STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT

GENERAL
A. If relocation of an existing public facility becomes necessary due to a conflict with the developer's new improvements, then the cost of said relocation shall be borne by the developer.

B. Comply with all applicable codes, regulations, ordinances and resolutions.

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
A. The Developer agrees to defend and indemnify and hold City, its officers, agents, employees, officials and representatives free and harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, attorneys' fees, injuries, costs, and liabilities arising from any suit for damages or for equitable or injunctive relief which is filed by a third party against the City by reason of its approval of developer's project.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
& COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION
H1.

PLANNING DIVISION
P1. The project shall comply with the Conditions of Architectural Review approvals (PLN2020-14457) and the mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report.

P2. Developer shall prepare and submit Covenant, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) to the City for review and approval. The approved CC&Rs are to be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits and a copy is provided to the Community Development Department.

PUBLIC WORKS

E2. All work within the public right-of-way and/or public easement, which is to be performed by the Developer/Owner, the general contractor, and all subcontractors shall be submitted within a Single Encroachment Permit to be reviewed and issued by the City Public Works Department. Issuance of the Encroachment Permit and payment of all appropriate fees shall be completed prior to commencement of work, and all work under the permit shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permit.

E4. Dedicate, as needed, on-site easements for new sidewalk, and any other new utilities by means of subdivision map or approved instrument at time of development and pay applicable processing fee.

E5. After City Council approval of the Tentative Map, submit 10 copies of the Subdivision Map, prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor or a Registered Civil Engineer with Land Surveyor privileges to the Engineering Department. The submittal shall include a title report, closure calculations, and all appropriate fees.

E6. Damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk within the public right-of-way along property’s frontage shall be repaired or replaced (to the nearest score mark) in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer or his ________________________________________________________________________________ PLN22-00390 950 Monroe Street Mixed-use Project Page 2 of 2 Planning Commission Hearing May 24, 2023
designee. The extents of said repair or replacement within the property frontage shall be at the discretion of the City Engineer or his designee.

E7. Dedicate traffic signal easement to encompass 5’ clearance from proposed traffic signal pole foundation.

E8. On TM-2 for Stars and Stripes Drive, add “Public R/W to be vacated per separate instrument” similar to Centennial. Also, callout vacation area under separate instrument for the triangular portion on Tasman.

E9. Ingress-egress easement (J347 OR 2195 & Doc 14150279) and public right-of-way (Doc 21195719) shall be vacated by separate instrument.

WATER & SEWER
W1. Related Approvals: Applicant shall comply with all related City approvals, entitlements, permits, or requirements associated with the subject property, unless explicitly superseded or revised by the Director of Water and Sewer Utilities.

W2. Easements: Prior to City’s issuance of Building or Grading Permits, the applicant shall provide a dedicated water utility easement around the backflow prevention device onsite. The water utility easement for the water services and all other public water appurtenances shall be a minimum 15 feet wide and be adjacent to the public right-of-way without overlapping any public utility easement.

Additionally, the applicant shall submit plans defining existing easements so Water Division can verify if there are any conflicts with proposed easements and water utilities.

SILICON VALLEY POWER
SVP1. Lot 1 will be allowed 2 services from SVP. 1 service is an existing service which is an overhead service for 1341 Homestead residence and the second service will be new one established for the rest of the site.

SVP2. Lots 2 and 3 will each keep their existing electrical service.

SVP3. Show all SVP easements on final parcel map.

CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
June 1, 2023 HLC MEETING
RTC 23-647
From: Robert Brock < >
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 3:57 PM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject:

Dear Council Members:

High-density housing and mixed-use city planning are absolutely essential to the health of our community and environment. The most direct solution to our housing crisis is to increase supply, and this project provides an excellent opportunity to do so. We cannot claim to care about solving homelessness without shifting away from low-density housing. As a Santa Clara resident, I am confident that this development is a necessary and exciting progression for the neighborhood.

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!

Among the many benefits to the city:

• It is an efficient use of land in downtown Santa Clara, • It is the perfect example of environmentally sustainable development, • The architectural quality will help create new building design ideas in the downtown area, • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals, • New walkable housing helps energize the upcoming new downtown core, • The building is consistent with (and was designed with) the Downtown Task Force goals. • Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for expansion in the downtown.

Thank you and I look forward to your yes vote on this project.

Sincerely,
Robert Brock
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Blamey < >
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 8:32 AM
To: Lesley Xavier <[email protected]>; Steve Le <[email protected]> Subject: 906-950 Monroe Street and 1341 Homestead Road
I am interested in finding out how to oppose the size and scope of the six story residential mixed use building planned for the above cited location. How does a six story building fit in to a neighborhood with single family dwellings? As a life long Santa Clara resident and homeowner near the site, it is unbelievable that zoning and planning would allow this type of monstrosity to be build. Please let me

CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
June 1, 2023 HLC MEETING
RTC 23-647
know the official formal process to oppose the scope of this project. In addition, please send the names and email addresses of all city council members. Email is preferred.

Jim Blamey
876 Monroe St.

Santa Clara
From: Myron Von Raesfeld < >
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 4:09 PM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>; Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: 950 Monroe St development
Please see the attached letter in support of the development proposal located at 950 Monroe St. Santa Clara. Please make sure every planning commissioner gets a copy of this letter. I truly believe this will be a great development for the downtown area.

Myron Von Raesfeld
Keller Williams Realty
Real Estate Broker
CA DRE: 00866594
North Carolina Lic: 302419
408-472-4025

YOUR CALIFORNIA TO RALEIGH CONNECTION
From: RebeccaG Flores < >
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 4:52 PM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>
Cc: Ariana Gasper <[email protected]>
Subject: 950 Monroe St.

Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!
Among the many benefits to the city:

CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
June 1, 2023 HLC MEETING
RTC 23-647
New walkable housing helps energize the upcoming new downtown core, The building is consistent with (and was designed with) the Downtown Task Force goals.

Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for expansion in the downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your yes vote on this project.

Sincerely,
Rebecca Flores
-----Original Message-----
From: Anna Fisher < >
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 3:22 PM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Monroe street development project
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara.

Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!

Among the many benefits to the city:

Thank you, and we look forward to your yes vote on this project.

Sincerely,
Anna Fisher
From: Mayor and Council <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 9:44 AM
To: Lesley Xavier <[email protected]>; Andrew Crabtree <[email protected]>; Reena Brilliot <[email protected]>
Cc: Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: New Downtown Proposal/Monroe Street project

CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
June 1, 2023 HLC MEETING
RTC 23-647
Forwarding to share with the recipients below. A copy has been sent to Council.

From: Brian Goldenberg < >
Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2023 10:59 PM
To: Mayor and Council <[email protected]>; Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: New Downtown Proposal/Monroe Street project
Hello Mayor Gillmor and Council, Planning Commission, and Historical Commission, I am a proud life-long Santa Claran and I am excited for the possibility of a new downtown for our city.

I am excited that the two historical houses won't be torn down. This part is very important to me to preserve Santa Clara's history.

And equally important is the ability to have quality places to go for dining and entertainment - in my own city!
For years now, I join my friends for dinner, festivals, and music nights in the downtowns of Campbell, Sunnyvale, Los Gatos, and Mountain View. I frequently wish we could have something similar in our great city. I frequently wonder why we don't have this already.

The idea of creating a new Downtown Santa Clara has been talked about for a while now. But now it's time for us to have a sense of urgency to make this happen.

Those other cities are passing us by when it comes to where Santa Clara Valley residents go to eat and enjoy themselves.

When you look at populations, we are 3 times larger than Campbell; 4 times larger than Los Gatos; almost twice as big as Palo Alto; and considerably bigger than Mountain View.

We have a great convention center, a great stadium, and a top-level university. And a great business district with world-class companies. We even have Great America! We have a lot of great people, places, and things in the city.

Why not a great destination center that attracts locals year-round? Why not a great downtown?
Let's have a great part of town that draws people from those other cities TO Santa Clara!
Let's please not delay this further to 'review reports' and 'study the project.' Yes, it is important to do those things while we are making progress....not spinning our wheels while the downtowns of other cities continue to prosper and they collect tax dollars that could be going to Santa Clara.

CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
June 1, 2023 HLC MEETING
RTC 23-647
our building in 1967٫ it was the first building completed in the Franklin Mall. I'm not against growth and development when it's good and meets the needs of all citizen's of Santa Clara. I'm NOT in favor of overbuilt projects by developers that are interested in making the most return on their investment to the detriment of Santa Clara and it's neighborhoods!! This project is overbuilt and overbearing!! The number of stories and lack of parking for this project is unacceptable. I DON'T call Bus #22 and a mile away from the train/Bus depot٫ being on a mass transit route. You as our elected and appointed Representatives need to make developement decisions that are best for Santa Clara. Allowing the State or any other Government authority to override your representation of your constituents is a derelict of duty. Let me give you some history of our Downtown because " those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it"!! The downtown was demolished by the Federal Redevelopment and then the Santa Clara Redelopment Agency٫ largely because of the lack of offstreet parking. The property owners of the Franklin Mall under a parking assessment district(still exists) purchased the land and built the 2 parking lots in the mall. They were built/required for public parking for the businesses in the mall٫ NOT to be overflow parking for underparked developments in the area. By allowing substantial parking variances on this project you will impact the offstreet parking٫ street parking٫ and traffic issue's in the Old Quad residential neighborhood (more conflict in the neighborhood). The folks living in this massive apt/condo complex will NOT be taking the #22 Bus to work or school. This project needs to be lowered in scale and more offstreet parking added(maybe 1 less floor of apt/condos and add parking to that floor). It's your duty to make decisions that are best for the citizen's of Santa Clara NOT maximising developer profits!!! I'm asking as a property owner and as a Santa Clara resident in this area٫ that you address the scale and parking on this development. Sincerely٫ David C. DeLozier٫ Former Santa Clara Councilmember٫ Santa Clara Businessowner٫ Santa Clara resident.

Sent from my iPad

1 Elizabeth Elliott
From: Karla Gutierrez
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 10:57 AM
To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Letter of Support
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!

Among the many benefits to the city:
•     It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail •    It is an environmentally sustainable development
•    The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area •    This mixed‐use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals •    New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core •    The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing
•    Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to our downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
Karla Gutierrez
From:

To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Letter of Support
Date: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 6:34:41 PM
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!
Among the many benefits to the city:
• It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail, • It is an environmentally sustainable development,
• The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area, • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals, • New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core, • The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing
• Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to ourdowntown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
Dave Paolinelli
From:

To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Letter of Support
Date: Thursday, May 11, 2023 11:16:52 AM
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th! Among the many benefits to the city:
• It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail
• It is an environmentally sustainable development
• The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals • New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core • The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing
• Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to our downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
Molly O’Leary
From:

To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Letter of Support
Date: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 6:52:15 PM
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th! Among the many benefits to the city:
• It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail
• It is an environmentally sustainable development
• The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals • New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core • The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing
• Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to our downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
--
Diyar
From:

To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Letter of Support
Date: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 6:12:56 PM
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th! Among the many benefits to the city:
• It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail,
• It is an environmentally sustainable development,
• The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area, • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals, • New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core, • The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing
• Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to ourdowntown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
Erica
From:

To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Letter of Support
Date: Friday, May 12, 2023 9:02:19 AM
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th! Among the many benefits to the city:
• It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail
• It is an environmentally sustainable development
• The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals • New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core • The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing
• Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to our downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
Angelina Paolinelli
From:

To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Letter of Support
Date: Friday, May 12, 2023 9:43:44 AM
Dear Council Members,
I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote YES for this project on July 11th! Among the many benefits to the city:
• It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail
• It is an environmentally sustainable development
• The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals • New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core • The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing • Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to our downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
Samantha
From:

To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Letter of Support
Date: Thursday, May 11, 2023 9:37:30 PM
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th! Among the many benefits to the city:
• It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail
• It is an environmentally sustainable development
• The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals • New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core • The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing • Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to our downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
Alexandria Raffo
From:

To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Letter of Support
Date: Thursday, May 11, 2023 11:24:01 AM
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th! Among the many benefits to the city:
• It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail
• It is an environmentally sustainable development
• The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals • New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core • The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing
• Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to our downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
Devon Mercurio
From:

To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe -Letter of Support
Date: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:57:12 PM
Dear Council Members:

I'm writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara.

Please vote YES for this project on JULY 11th!
Among the many benefits to the city:
• It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail.
• It is an environmentally sustainable development.
• The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area. • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals. • New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core. • The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing.
• Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to our downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Thank you,
Lindsey Davidson
--
NOTICE: This email and all attachments are confidential and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under law. If you are not the intended recipient, delete this message and notify the sender immediately. Any unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.

From:

To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Letter of Support
Date: Thursday, May 11, 2023 11:22:49 AM
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!
Among the many benefits to the city:
• It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail • It is an environmentally sustainable development
• The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals • New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core • The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing
• Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to our downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
Jay Gutierrez
From:

To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe -Letter of Support
Date: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:57:12 PM
Dear Council Members:

I'm writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

From:

To: Steve Le
Cc: Ariana Gasper
Subject: 950 Monroe st letter of support
Date: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 8:09:14 PM
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!
Among the many benefits to the city:
• It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail • It is an environmentally sustainable development
• The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals • New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core • The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing
• Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to our downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
Shaun
From:

To: Steve Le
Subject: 950 Monroe Street - Support Letter
Date: Thursday, May 11, 2023 9:05:49 PM
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!
Among the many benefits to the city:

It is an efficient use of land in downtown Santa Clara, It is the perfect example of environmentally sustainable development, The architectural quality will help create new building design ideas in the downtown area, This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals, New walkable housing helps energize the upcoming new downtown core, The building is consistent with (and was designed with) the Downtown Task Force goals.

Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for expansion in the downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your yes vote on this project.

Sincerely,
Bobby Caya
From:

To: Steve Le; [email protected]
Cc: Ariana Gasper
Subject: 950 Monroe Street
Date: Thursday, May 11, 2023 7:20:20 AM
Dear Council Members -
I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara.

Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!
Below are some of the benefits to the city:

It is an efficient use of land in downtown Santa Clara
It is the perfect example of environmentally sustainable development The architectural quality will help create new building design ideas in the downtown area This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals New walkable housing helps energize the upcoming new downtown core The building is consistent with (and was designed with) the Downtown Task Force goals Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for expansion in the downtown Thank you for your consideration, and we look forward to your yes vote on this project.

Best,
Riley
From:

To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Street Project
Date: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:43:03 PM
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Streetcondominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!
Among the many benefits to the city:

It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail,
It is an environmentally sustainable development,
The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area, This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals, New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core,
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing,
Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to our downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
Emily
1 Lucy Garcia
From: David Paolinelli
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 6:34 PM
To: Steve Le
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Letter of Support
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!

Among the many benefits to the city:

•    It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail, •    It is an environmentally sustainable development,
•    The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area, •    This mixed‐use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals, •    New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core, •    The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing
•    Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to ourdowntown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
Dave Paolinelli
RTC 23-637
Correspondence
From: Carrick Young
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 1:33 PM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Street, Santa Clara - Support Letter Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!
Among the many benefits to the city:
• It is an efficient use of land in downtown Santa Clara, • It is the perfect example of environmentally sustainable development, • The architectural quality will help create new building design ideas in the downtown area,
• This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals, • New walkable housing helps energize the upcoming new downtown core, • The building is consistent with (and was designed with) the Downtown Task Force goals. • Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for expansion in the downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your yes vote on this project.

From: Kevin Coyle
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 8:40 AM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Street, Santa Clara - Support Letter Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!

Among the many benefits to the city:

RTC 23-637
Correspondence
• It is an efficient use of land in downtown Santa Clara, • It is the perfect example of environmentally sustainable development, • The architectural quality will help create new building design ideas in the downtown area,
• This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals, • New walkable housing helps energize the upcoming new downtown core, • The building is consistent with (and was designed with) the Downtown Task Force goals.
• Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for expansion in the downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your yes vote on this project.

Sincerely,
Kevin
--------------
Kevin Coyle
From: Nick Casaccia
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 11:46 PM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>
Subject: 950 Monroe Street, Santa Clara - Support Letter Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!

Among the many benefits to the city:

RTC 23-637
Correspondence
• Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for expansion in the downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your yes vote on this project.

Sincerely,

Nick Casaccia
From: Lane Hustead
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 1:37 PM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Street, Santa Clara - Support Letter Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!

Among the many benefits to the city:

Thank you and we look forward to your yes vote on this project.

Sincerely,
Lane Hustead
_________________________
Lane P. Hustead, CPA, CFP®
Associate Wealth Advisor
Bordeaux Wealth Advisors
Silicon Valley | Seattle
(650) 419-1181 Direct
[email protected]
Website | LinkedIn
RTC 23-637
Correspondence
This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy, or distribute this message. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.

From: Ethan Clements
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 9:30 AM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Street, Santa Clara
Dear Council Members,
I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!
Among the many benefits to the city:
• It is an efficient use of land in downtown Santa Clara, • It is the perfect example of environmentally sustainable development, • The architectural quality will help create new building design ideas in the downtown area, • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals, • New walkable housing helps energize the upcoming new downtown core, • The building is consistent with (and was designed with) the Downtown Task Force goals. • Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for expansion in the downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your yes vote on this project.

Sincerely,
Ethan Clements
From: Michael Liebes
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 8:50 AM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>
RTC 23-637
Correspondence
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 950 Monroe Street, Santa Clara
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!

Among the many benefits to the city:

Thank you and we look forward to your yes vote on this project.

Sincerely,
Michael Liebes
From: Grant Chou
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:50 PM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>
Subject: [email protected]
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!

Among the many benefits to the city:

• It is an efficient use of land in downtown Santa Clara, RTC 23-637
Correspondence
• It is the perfect example of environmentally sustainable development, • The architectural quality will help create new building design ideas in the downtown area, • This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals, • New walkable housing helps energize the upcoming new downtown core, • The building is consistent with (and was designed with) the Downtown Task Force goals. • Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for expansion in the downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your yes vote on this project.

Sincerely,
Grant
--
Grant Chou
Santa Clara University '17
From: Max Kollmorgen
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 9:20 PM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>
Subject: [email protected]
Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara.

Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!

Among the many benefits to the city:

It can revitalize downtown Santa Clara with much needed housing and community serving ground floor retail,
RTC 23-637
Correspondence
It is an environmentally sustainable development,
The architectural quality will create a dynamic and vibrant downtown area, This mixed-use project supports the city’s Housing Element Goals, New walkable housing helps energize the downtown core,
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan and Housing goals while providing much needed affordable housing,
Adding housing like this enables local retailers to thrive and plan for further growth to our downtown.

Thank you and we look forward to your support on this project.

Sincerely,
Max
RE: PLN2020-14457
906 – 950 Monroe Street & 1341 Homestead Road
Dear Mayor, Council Members, Planning Commissioners, and Historical Landmarks Commission of the City of Santa Clara:

The Downtown Community Task Force (DCTF) has been working on developing a Precise Plan for the revitalization of Santa Clara’s Downtown to ensure that there is a clear vision to achieve a successful and vibrant “place” for all to enjoy for many generations to come.

The effort to restore Santa Clara’s Downtown has taken years to culminate into the opportunity that lays before us. Over the past 60+ years, numerous attempts have been made to heal the scar that urban renewal left on our city, but all have fallen short due to logistics, long term lease agreements, and a need for the community to lead. “No land-use decision of the last half-century has damaged the urban fabric of a city more than Santa Clara’s decision to tear down its eight-block downtown in the 1960s. The result has no coherence, no center, no charm.”
(Herhold, S. (2017, April 24) The Worst Local Decisions of the Last 50 Years. San Jose Mercury News) The current community led effort to return a key section of Franklin St. to the public has created the opportunity to re-connect the downtown area by means of a main street that many thought was not possible. For the first time since the early 1980’s, Santa Clara’s Downtown could be connected by a public right-of-way. Residents and community groups have spent RTC 23-637
Correspondence
countless hours researching, analyzing, and understanding the complexities of development, urban planning, and current government policies to incorporate them into the current Precise Plan that is near completion. The Downtown Precise Plan will provide a clear set of guidelines that will allow us to create a thoughtful “place” for all Santa Clara community members to enjoy.

The proposal for the 906 – 950 Monroe & 1341 Homestead (Monroe Development) being submitted prior to the approval of the Precise Plan and Form Based Code will only result in the same “parcel-by-parcel” development the area has struggled with since being leveled by urban renewal. The current proposal does not follow the Downtown Precise Plan or Form Based Code requirements that will outline and guide future development within the 10-blocks.

If the Monroe Development is allowed to proceed, this will undermine the intention of the Downtown Precise Plan and set a bad precedent for other development proposals to follow as we continue to work diligently to complete the Downtown Precise Plan.

The proposed Monroe development does not consider the Downtown Precise Plan, Form Based Code, or even the current General Plan, thus requiring it to be submitted as a Planned Development. The Planned Development (PD) zoning designation was intended for “unique and unusual” sites that do not allow traditional zoning and/or planning guidelines to apply. This site is not “unique or unusual” and the current General Plan zoning and planning guidelines could be applied. Since the current General Plan requirements are applicable, the developer should either comply with these requirements or wait and follow the Downtown Precise Plan and Form Based Code, which are scheduled to be approved later this year.

Development projects of today will last beyond most of our time together and as we face many challenges and are pressured to meet goals, we must not make the same mistake leaders in the past made by rushing to approve “something” through a parcel-by-parcel approach, resulting in a mish mash of buildings that do not contribute to the community that we believe Downtown Santa Clara once was and can be again. We believe we should stay focused on the larger vision that will create a thoughtful, community-oriented “place” for many generations of Santa Clara residents to come.
“A society grows great when old men (women) plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit” – Greek Proverb
The DCTF respectfully asks that the development proposal for 906 – 950 Monroe & 1341 Homestead not be approved until the Downtown Precise Plan and Form Based Code are approved, implemented, and enforced. This parcel should be developed, but it should be consistent with the community vision articulated within the approved Downtown Precise Plan and Form Based Code.

Sincerely,
Chair - Adam Thompson
Co-Chair - Dan Ondrasek
RTC 23-637
Correspondence
On behalf of all members of the Downtown Community Task Force From: Ariana Gasper <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 6:39 AM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: 950 Monroe Street, Santa Clara - Support Letter Hi Steve,
It looks like they forgot to add the Ca at the end of your email address. Please see letter of support below.

Best regards,
Ariana Gasper
From: Nick Casaccia
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 11:43 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: Ariana Gasper <[email protected]>
Subject: 950 Monroe Street, Santa Clara - Support Letter

Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!

Among the many benefits to the city:

Thank you and we look forward to your yes vote on this project.

Sincerely,

Nick Casaccia
RTC 23-637
Correspondence
From: Travis McAuley
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 8:34 AM
To: Steve Le <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: In Support of 950 Monroe Street Condominium Project Dear Council Members:

I am writing in support of the 950 Monroe Street condominium and townhome project in Santa Clara. Please vote yes for this project on July 11th!

Among the many benefits to the city:

Thank you and we look forward to your yes vote on this project.

Sincerely,
Travis McAuley
Dear Planner Steve,

RTC 23-637
Correspondence
Good day! Attached you will find a letter that I have written in support of the project at 950 Monroe Street in Santa Clara.

Please share it with the Staff and the Planning Commission.

With appreciation,

Emmy

M.E. "Emmy" Moore-Minister

May 12, 2023
Santa Clara Planning Commission
and Planning Staff
c/o Steve Le
Associate Planner
City of Santa Clara
1500 Warburton Ave.

Santa Clara, CA, 95050
Dear Honorable Chair Cherukuru, Fellow Planning Commissioners, and Planning Staff,
I write to you today, in full support of the project at 950 Monroe St., located in the “Heart of the City’s Old Quad” neighborhood, and a project, that is committed to environmental sustainability.
√ This project, which has been in the planning stage for a few years now, (and his received significant citizen input and suggestions from folks including myself), has been designed and redesigned with thoughtful architectural modifications throughout.
√ This project has been reduced in units from the original proposal of 61 down to 54 units.
√ Three homes with historical significance will be saved and maintained. √ The project is extremely compatible with the area and supports plans to bring vitality to the City’s inner core as it moves forward with plans to revitalize the S.C. Downtown Area.
√ The 54 units adds to the City’s much-need for additional housing units. √ The ground floor retail creates a “village” feel where neighbors and their pets will feel welcome.
√ The project is located near public transit and is in walking distance to the Santa Clara Transit Center, with access to VTA, Caltrain, and Capitol Corridor.
√ This particular type of housing stock is compatible for various age groups, and most importantly, appealing to retiring Santa Claran’s (Seniors) who would like to “scale down” from a large family home to a smaller and more efficient living space, while still being able to reside in the Mission City, close to amenities and just blocks from the City’s Senior Center.

It is for all the reasons above, and more, that I respectfully request that you approve this project. It’s well-thought-out, it’s great for Santa Clara’s Downtown, and it’s good for the overall community.

Respectfully Submitted,
M. E. Emmy Moore-Minister
Co-Founder
Old Quad Residents Association

POST MEETING MATERIAL
June 1, 2023 HLC Meeting
RTC 23-647
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 10:28 AM Lucilia Haro < > wrote:

Dear Historical and Landmarks Commission,
We are writing to express our concerns about the proposed mixed-use project located at 950 Monroe Street. Our property “touches” the proposed site. Our craftsman bungalow home was built in 1918 and is listed on the historic preservation and resource inventory list for the City of Santa Clara, as both architecturally and historically significant.

As long-time residents of the City of Santa Clara and more specifically, residents of The Old Quad, we are concerned about the proposed rezoning of the historic combining district to a planned development district. The proposed development would involve dismantling an old historic neighborhood and constructing a high-rise six-story building, in addition to four proposed townhomes (on a small parcel of land). This would undermine the historical landscape of the neighborhood and measures should be taken to protect the authenticity of the neighborhood.

Our opposition is also based on these potential/probable negative effects:
· Scope of development is comparatively more impactful (in both size and scope) than the DT Gateway Project (Benton, Monroe, Franklin; Silicon Sage project). · Proposed project includes 64 rear-facing windows viewing directly into our backyard, eliminating any sense of privacy.
· Four second-story townhomes with four rear-facing balconies peering into our backyard with a set-back of ten feet from our property line (DT Gateway project was built with a set-back of 45 feet from rear-facing residential neighbors). Residents in townhomes (on balconies) will be positioned to look directly into our backyard, such close proximity will have a profoundly intrusive impact on our privacy.
· Two large outdoor community terraces (located on the proposed fourth and fifth floors) will also invade our privacy, as well as our surrounding neighbors. (DT Gateway was built without any terraces overlooking neighboring homes).
· The proposal does not maintain livability for adjacent neighbors; significant loss of privacy, solar access diminished, and physical impacts (i.e. parking, ground vibrations, traffic, noise levels, privacy, loss of sunlight, visual qualities, etc). · Noise concerns with the introduction of a Klaus Multiparking system (no other project in the City of Santa Clara has a Klaus Multiparking system adjacent to residential neighbors, therefore impact is unknown). Highly concerned with noise levels since our historic homes (and our surrounding neighbors) are not equipped to endure high levels of noise. · Project does not achieve compatibility between a featureless, multi-use, multi-story development with an existing historic, small-scale, single family neighborhood. Architectural

POST MEETING MATERIAL
June 1, 2023 HLC Meeting
RTC 23-647
drawings are void of any historical elements/interest and therefore do not blend well with the two remaining historical homes located on the same east-facing block. · Project lacks sufficient buffer(s) to mitigate the impacts of a larger scale development adjacent to single-family historic homes. Homes directly surrounding this project (touching the site) are all over one hundred years old and require more sensitivity and thoughtfulness than nonhistoric homes.

The current neighborhood has significant historical value, and it is important (if not vital) to preserve this value for future generations. We urge you to consider the impact that this development would have on the character of the neighborhood (The Old Quad) and to take steps to ensure that any development is in keeping with the historical integrity of the area.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Jorge and Lucy Haro
1 Steve Le
From: HistoricalLandmarksCommission
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 1:28 PM
To: Steve Le
Subject: FW: historical homes in the 900 block of Monroe St. in Santa Clara. 3 of 3.

From: Jan Wittman
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 8:33 AM
To: HistoricalLandmarksCommission <[email protected]> Subject: historical homes in the 900 block of Monroe St. in Santa Clara.

Dear Members of the Commission,
Please save our historical homes!
Jan Wittman

POST MEETING

MATERIAL
6/29/23 HLC MEETING
RTC 23-779
1 Steve Le
From: HistoricalLandmarksCommission
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 1:28 PM
To: Steve Le
Subject: FW: Homes on Monroe to be destroyed or removed 2 of 3.
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
From: connie Hill >
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 6:14 AM
To: HistoricalLandmarksCommission <[email protected]> Subject: Homes on Monroe to be destroyed or removed
Dear Planning Dept. Please do not move or destroy. I the owners can not keep these for commercial use, then the city should buy and keep them for their use. These are historical and help to keep the Old Quad area, Old Quad. The look and Manor of Santa Clara should not be destroyed or compromised for future, in corporate them into a wonderful walking area and part of commercial use. Many other cities in our country do it, why can’t Santa Clara. I love walking down Monroe and seeing these. They could be a Restaurant or Coffee shop and make the front an out side area. They could be a clothing store, an emergency office for people who need first aid. Please use your imagination and keep them.

Thank you for your consideration in this manner.

Connie Hill
1410 Santa Clara St.

Owner of a home in Old Quad and want to keep our historical homes where they were originally built of our Cities History.

Sent from my iPad

POST MEETING MATERIAL
6/29/23 HLC MEETING
RTC 23-779
1 Steve Le
From: HistoricalLandmarksCommission
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 1:27 PM
To: Steve Le
Subject: FW: Protect homes at 906 and 930 Monroe Street 1 of 3
From: Anne King >
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 11:22 PM
To: Anne King >; HistoricalLandmarksCommission
<[email protected]>
Subject: Protect homes at 906 and 930 Monroe Street
Please, please, please protect the historic homes at 906 and 930 Monroe Street from the possibility of future misuse due to the stripping of their protections as historic properties. The whole of the historical character of the Old Quad and some outlying properties from the late 1800s and early 1900s will be compromised by the destruction of either of these houses, and a very valuable historical resource will be lost to our wonderful city.

We live in the heart of the Old Quad and are so grateful to have been given this beautiful place to live. Please protect it for us!
Thank you,
Dennis and Anne King

POST MEETING

MATERIAL
6/29/23 HLC MEETING
RTC 23-779
File No (s): PLN2020-14457
Location: 906-950 Monroe Street and 1341 Homestead Road Applicant: Salvatore Caruso
Owner: Lamb Partners LLC
Dear Chairwoman Priya Cherukuru, and members of the Planning Commission, My name is Lucy Haro. I am a life-long Santa Clara Resident, homeowner of 945 Madison Street and I am writing to you today to express my opposition to the proposed high-rise, mixed-use development located at 950 Monroe Street.

Our craftsman bungalow home was built in 1918 and is listed on the historic preservation and resource inventory list for the City of Santa Clara, as both architecturally and historically significant. Our historic property “touches” the proposed site and is well within 200 feet of the proposed development.

Our opposition to this project is based primarily on the size and scope of this project. The recent construction of DT Gateway (Benton, Monroe, Franklin Street project) has set the precedent of what the size and scope should be for a neighboring development (on the same front-facing side of Monroe Street). A taller, more intrusive structure (such as what is being currently proposed) will not complement or enhance the small-scale neighborhood, especially given the fact that this large-scale mixed-use project will be front-facing and adjacent to two two-story historical single-family homes.

For your reference, I’ve included a table that highlights the significant differences between the DT Gateway Development and the new mixed-use project.

Downtown Gateway
(SiliconSage Builders)
950 Monroe Street
(Lamb Partners)
Land Area: 1.04 acres 0.87-acre site located at 906, 930, and 950 Monroe.

Number of Dwellings
/ Space:
44 residential
condominiums and
14,477 sq ft of retail
space
50 multi-family residential units and
~2,000 square feet of ground floor retail/restaurant space.

Number of
Townhomes:

Zero Four detached two-story townhouses would also be constructed on-site. Requires subdivision of current historical homes (906 and 930 Monroe Street)
Number of Balconies: Zero Two large outdoor terraces (fourth and fifth floors) overlooking neighborhood and residential homes
Number of Stories /
average height of
roofline:

Four (Height at highest
peak: ~60 feet – Benton
and Monroe)
Average height of the
roofline (fourth floor) is
~56 feet)
Six (Height at highest peak: ~85 feet – Franklin and Monroe) sited:

June 14, 2022 architecture plans
Average height of the roofline (sixth floor) is ~78 feet.

Project set-back(s) 45 feet (from rearfacing residential neighbors)
20 feet (mixed-use project) - (from rear-facing residential neighbors)
10 feet (townhomes) - (from rear-facing residential neighbors) Number of Parking
Spaces:
145 (additional 16
spaces in a tandem
configuration)
81 parking spaces (Updated 5/25/23; reduced parking in
accordance with California State Law)
In conclusion, this project is excessive, and a reduction of units (and floors) would vastly improve this project’s impact on the community. As it stands now, this project does not maintain livability for adjacent neighbors; some of the physical impacts include, increased parking issues, increased traffic, increased noise levels, loss of privacy, visual qualities, etc. If the proposed project is built (as it is being proposed today), it will undermine the historical landscape and fabric of The Old Quad. Let’s not repeat the mistakes of urban renewal that was done to our downtown in the 1960’s.

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Lucy Haro
945 Madison Street
PFSKiNPB9EESSIOM.US·
SALYATD<IE C DES:G• cooPOa,,,T
g50 ELCO.~;so RDI... sum: 200
s.,..,,-ACL.ARA, C0.95050
PHO"!: : (•0e) !lll8-•Ge7
~
C"l<: (408)998-•0S!
255SH0RW',[DR,VE, SUITE 200
Rt:DWOOO 01Y, CA 9•065
P!<ONE:: (650)482 -6JOO
PROIEGI QfSCRIPJKlN•
""""" LAM8 IWITNCIIS, LI.C 5-.15M DlllFflll R<ll~, SU IJ[ 1go ~Eh'LO PAl!I(. CA 94025 PHONE: (650) 20!!- 4H5
DOMlU110N Of THE SWil..l_ RflM_TO BIILDAN£W50CO~OOS~O
~04TOllltHlUSE:Of"f!OUS:NCPROJECTINCI.LONCClENEIW.
~~~GROOJ<DFI.OOIITO-AI.JlC-OOWl<Jl)WII
L01UliEIOIIJSIWEl<TISPROPOSEDrtllllllEDll5ll"CSINGI.EC...,._T HOUES: AM£WIW0CNICNIAC£rtlll9.IO MONROERIIA 1 CAR
CNIAC£ roll THE 906 -'ICE Pl.US A SIJWJ,;:E P,UUO"'- IS PIIOPOSCDTO - Tt!E SNQl£ f....,11.Y "'°"'ESON SITE
PACMlE15'10fTOTAL U..r5.SNTOR!WI..EIOJSINGINTSONSIT£
P£RaTY'SORIIUW <CE17.40.o!IO;AI..L NT0RDMl.£lt<ITSWll.LI!£ PISPO!SED ON THEPROJECTSITE(ONE-TOll.....ws€Rll7 -=,

SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR
906,930,940,950 MONROE STREET & 1341 HOMESTEAD RD.
.,.,.. \
. \ . .,,.
\
\
SANTA CLARA, CA 95050
.,,, • • 0
THEAPPIJCA8l(C00CS ARE/ISAMCNOE08VTIIE STATEOF"CtLIF'ORIMAND IBE CrTYOF"SNITACIJ\AA AfEPBPARI f HOIJSING NOTE·
HEWPVIINEODEVELOPME"'11SONLYINLOT 1. LOT 2AHO LOTJ WILLREIIWN/IS HISTORIC51NGL£ f.W.LY HOMES.

TOT>L NEVIIRESIDEtmAL UNIT PROPOSEDIS55
CONOOMINIUMUNITS(!,OCONOOMCNIUM + 4TOWN
~g~~AN~ONE~>.tiDINGHOMEAT1341
NUMBEROF"W'FORD.<8L£HOOSNCU N/TSWIL.LBE 55 • 0.15• 11.25UNITS PRCMDE&1TOWNHOME-'F'FC>Ro.o.BU:UNIT 7CONOOMINIUMUN,'TS IN MO.INBUIUXNG

SHEET INDEX
8llQilifill&L
--= PROPOSEDISTn.ooRPI.NI
PROPOSEDJRCfUIORPI.N,I
PROPOSED•lll fUIORPlAN
PROPOSED&TH n.ooRPI.NI
PROPOSED lll\lfUIOR PlAN
PROPOSEDELLYATIONS - TOII....O,,,ES
txmlHC .II PRCIPCSED CLLYATIONSm'.ll.

SfORW/1,TER CCMR0L DEfMS
l!EST .......«110<T PIVCllCES
'1"£ 0EPA/m0<T""TERSO"f'I.YAN0 ,CCC$$PI.NI

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
==
~

TRASH MANAGEMENT
"""""-"" EB
?IOOPOSEOOO<SJJY(OwEwoou...-?ERICRE)
2fl-20--- 2&9-20-01fl,2119-20-DIIII

7.9700F+ 7,&22Sl'+ 22,- - Ja.111DSF(D.87.<CR£)
IIIXE0-1.!Sl:(IIEfAII.ANDOOfE,IIESIDEl<TIAI.- MUI..TI-f-.") LDT 1, 5!I RE9DElfTW_CONDOYNL.II UHITS
LDT •a1 CQHDOlalillJMFOIIAI.Lfl.OORCOIIIIOII-..S
I.OT l•i - llOfll'l,R~GGAIW.teotiDQW:~lolUNITS
LOf 1aJl'Ef~L COliDQ .. ,._,M Ut,ITS
LDT 2, 1 (EJSl<Q..E f,.._YIKIWE
TOWNHO\JSE, TWOfLOORS;
CO~DQw:,.,_1,1, I l&EI. Of e,.so,,o,r + $ STQR:ES ~ TIIE GIWlO R2 ,fl..OORSOfRESI A2CJ!Ol!OOLEVEL , M
(CIIClUl;D L.Ml. REl'NL). S- 2 (PAlll(l<Q), A- J {ltRJll,CE). B (GYM) COMMONSPACECALCULATION l'[RPAC[
f'RIVATEB4LCO:>IY
IOli',LN"""'U<U•"•"''""'""' 1u,..,.~-•v•ww"'-""'~"•""•••~v• "'"''"mnA" '"""""'~"""'"~ •uN«tvv•» " 'I ,, ,,,..,...,~•• ., ,ornn,,t,Horit>< N1'1
~l~L\1 11,H _CI IYCOl,'MINII
1::::::::::::::::::-::.::~::;,7-"
I
I
I
I
I
I
M ,.rn,,r,,n IN ,u,,u,. ~,. I Hr'""""" nnN~-.. n •~ IQT•<M•~OVll)fO, 71)1' IHf ltl'AtnUJi',LWl,IIU,fQIIIP,\I ~A'll' I~~ •onv,nm"""""'""N'" ,-1111Vn1m.n, ,..,.,,...v,~ .. ......,.,v,.......,. ,...,.,NDIL<lllll hlll'Ttn,, .. ,N ..
, lllll'COCD_(lfj,IIQUNDl<OOII_
I O, !lt(W!Q-l(•IJllJijgl~~tllM0'™'11'1•AA!l~Qtl'Oll U (l•Or,t.CII' ,,11c'"'"'"' """'""NC'1AVAnaotr 1Nn•""'"""' H"'"""'" N<;""'.h""lrH(l>N!AIH• t1 •"''- i 1uc,.c .... a ... 111;JNCW1<LAISQlf AV...,LAl,HTIOflrn«ClAll'""Ow.QII I <roAOKIHOMO )N no,_o,.ocorQO"" •(l[)fl.;,t,•lll9" t'•"•~Gl#•([I
SCDC

SAL VA TORE CARUSO
DESIGN CORPORATION 911ELCI.MNlW,L, Jm,5.INTAct..w..CAffllO ltl.Mt.(4)9'JI.Q7 • FAX.Mt.(4)991-1:S """''

SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN
_,,,,, .. MNTACUIA. Clm50
1).lllOlESlIADRD. • SA.~ACWA,CI~

1. ocMEJ•• •• u u• ~••aoc ............... , ..... .

COVER SHEET
A0.1 SHEEl'S N!IET ___ _
VIEW FROM MONROE ST 3 STORY 4 STORY
3 STORY 6 STORY
URBAN FORM FRAMEWOR K AS SHOWN ON PAGE 45 OF THE SANTA CLARA DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN - EARLY 2022
6 STORY
6 STORY
SCDC

SAL VA TORE CARUSO
DESIGN CORPORATION 911tLCIJIN)W,i.,Jm,S.OOAQ..w.,CA!SllO ltl.Mt.(4)9'11-!Cf1 • FAX.Mo(Q:)991-1:S

SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN
,.,,.,.,,.,,,,, .. MNTACUV.,CAm50
13-lllO!IS'JIAillUI. • SAMTACWA,C\~
1 • .. MEJ•• ••uu• ~••aoc 1;__,.,., ... ,im ...... •
.;,,..,.., .. .,,,.,,; . ...,,.~ ·-··-----

RENDERING
A0.2 '------------------------------------------------------------ ~------

VIEW FROM MONROE ST

INDOOR OUTDOOR CONNECTIONS
AS SHOWN ON PAGE 85 OF THE SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN PREC ISE PLAN

INDOOR OUTDOOR CONN ECTIONS

WITH SIDEWALK AND PARK STR IP PER SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN
SCDC

SAL VA TORE CARUSO
DESIGN CORPORATION 911ELCI.MNlW,L,Jm,5.INTAct..w..CAffllO ltl.Mt.(4)9'11-Q7 • FAX.Mo(Q:)991-1:S

SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN
_,,,,, .. MNTACUIA.Clm50
1l-1110lES1WlRD. • SA.~ACWA,CI~

1. ocMEJ•• ••uu• ~••aoc ............... , ...... . h,..,..,, • .,,,.,,; • ...,,.~ ·-··-----

RENDERING
A0.3 '---------------------------------------------------------- ~-----

VIEW FROM HOMESTEAD RD
SCDC

SAL VA TORE CARUSO
DESIGN CORPORATION 911ELCI.MNlW,L,Jm,S-INTAct..w..CAffllO ltl.Mt.(4)9'11-Q7 • FAX.Mo(Q:)991-d

SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN
_,,,,, .. S>.NTACUIA.Clm50
1l-1110lES1WlRD. • SA.~ACWA,CI~

1. ocMEJ•• •• u u• ~••aoc ............... , .... .. .
·-··-----

RENDERING
A0.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------- ~------ ,-----------------~-----------T-----------------------------,,\ i
i
i
i
i
i f-----------------------, f------------------------------------j i i
Di ,.,
_,,_"" i
i COMMERCIAL USE i
RESIDENTIAL f--------------------------------7 269- 20- 091 I , . I I ~·~~'~;:clAL USE i

RESIDENTIAL
, I f--- . - T --..- - ~ --.. - {--------------------------------~ ' i i
1' '·
i
i
i
i
i
\
(E)SHEDT0 -0 BEDEMOLJSHE:D
AR EA- 127 SF
269-20-095 0.18/7970
(E)HOUSETO
REMAIN
AREA•2,029SF
I . , i ,! ,.,_,,_085 !
' 'I COMMERCIAL USE I
i i i '
TOTAL6,5J7SF

COMMERCIAL TO BE
DEl.4OLISHED
269- 20- 086 0.52/22588
•-.___ ___ M _ _l_ ____ ~ ___ _l_ _____________ ~--------~ MONROE

G) EXISTING SITE PLAN
SCDC

SAL VA TORE CARUSO
DESIGN CORPORATION 911ELCI.MNlW,L, Jm,5.INTAct..w..CAffllO ltl.Mt.(4)9'11-Q7 • FAX.Mo(Q:)991-1:S

SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN
_,,,,, .. MNTACUIA.CAm50
. IJ411Dl1m:ADRD.

SA.'iTAOJ.RA,CA~
i:oo,,i_.ms :
........ ~:/fl""% ·-··~·---'°"· EXISTING

SITE PLAN
EE ~17/2(123 A1-0
I L _____ _
, -----------------~-----------T-----------------------------"\

RESIDENTIAL
i
i
i
i
i
i
f---------------------------------j
i i DI -·~~ I RESIDENTIAL ~-------------------------------7 269- 20- 091 I , . I I . , I ! i
c==:::J "r j
., i - ~ -crt'"-"1 r/h---,--'.,------,~~ -:-:-,--.....,.__ __ .....,..~, I ~ll i 111111111 I
◄ i
______________________________________________________________________ j

G) PROPOSED SITE PLAN
L_ _____________________________ _
SCDC

SAL VA TORE CARUSO
DESIGN CORPORATION 911ELCI.MNlW,L,Jm,5.INTAct..w..CAffllO ltl.Mt.(4)9'11-Q7 • FAX.Mo(Q:)991-1:S

SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN
_,,,,, .. MNTACUIA.CAm50
. IJ411Dl1m:ADRD.

SA.'iTAOJ.RA,CA~
i:oo,,i_.ms:
........ ~:/fl""%
·-··~·---'°"·

PROPOSED

SITE PLAN
EE ~17/2(123
A1-1 $HE(qNWf __
0-
®- -
©-
®-
©-
0--
\,,_
y 7 21'-DJ." y 2s·- 10· y 27' - 6" ~
I I I
~J~~D p~~~~G~ 68 (PROVIDE 29 LEVEL 2 EV rEAOY &: 6 LOW POWER LEVEL ~ EV READY) TOTAL7JPR0\11DED
...... _ ~----------------------~--------+-----------------------------+----------------~

G) PROPOSED BASEMENT PLAN
Ill( •tocv.mr11aT'!•cno~r ... N 11"0\HIO(AI.I\N OII Qt\'(()'""!Ml'I r,THIM'lnrn,~ M.., ... NT l .... • lltMrtN'Mr,M)l, .. n l'IOM.ffl!Af. f!l!VIM!>Tllf 'PM!lllll'Al:UAM'
•C• GAUi!! ~
1,t .... <\l,ftlol\Plll<<lll'Ull<n
r10,,,111:0 1N .. l!M1:~1,,,•uwovnt11
Ol()\llt'IIOQM ql()I.IN~OlOQII
I l)ffWAl.1'!W!llHl•M11N•ll•mlolllf'rMUl•Alli l~·-AIIINl!Artf, l U.IC1111C,III Cl\ll!IGIN'o ll AYAll.',ll.llN IHI .,.M:~ UIC'ftllMllUN!iMIA\\,t]Ot(OtHAl~-1 \.Ulll,l, I. U.IG!lUC JIii Ol',!l(jlN'olllU.Al)O H AVA'l./lkiAT Kl!H l~I IWI I ANPIMII N till ,AIIU~ij AIIV,ON Tiff GIIOWOHtlOII ,01 A~ >.00 ALllll•ti'Al"S ACI
SCDC

SAL VA TORE CARUSO
DESIGN CORPORATION 911ELCI.MN>W,L,l !(l),W,TActA\,CAU
1U..No.(Q)M-Q7 • PAX.J4o.(Q)M-QI
"""' '

SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN
~MONRIEST
SAlffACUlA.CA9l050
. IJ411D!E3IDJ)RD.

SOOACURA,CA9il;,O
, .. ..., ..... E•••10m,.. uo. .,_..,.,..,,."' ...

PROPOSED

BASEMENT PLAN
EE ~ 11/2023
A2.1 $HE(f!IN1(1' ___ _

n,-,-
i Ii I
i'
1 1
I U
11 '1
i 11
ii'
i
I I
Oill ~ - I fTl I
i~ 1 1 i fTl r I 6 '
I I
i
I

TOWNHOMES MS FOUR
THREE BEDRO~o' FLOORS. UNITS, TOTAL
CONDOMINIUM 4
ONE BEDROOM 8

TWO BEDROOM
TOTAL 12
i i
I ___J.Ji ,I i
Jr( \,'----____ _/ --~ / __ ==l-~\=~cs=N~cs=E============- \ L·,,, 'w . /-- - - - - - - - - " \~~· J ·~-< ~-- \~-L:W!!f,,_ ~/ --------n- ![
ii \1
11 ·I
ii 11
I
G) PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR PLAN
-71rl
1 ii I
I i I
iii
i
'7
:::0
)>
z
1 7'
1' ' - , z 111

SANTA CLARA
DOWNT,£..~
~C\mso
. ~~:so
n,-,-
i ii I Ii
i 1
I U
I
I I
i
I I O ill ~ -
l rTJ I_ . U) j_ J, I-, ,,,-- I l s;:1 11 I
0 .

I I
i
G)
PROPOSED 3RD FLOOR PLAN

TOWNHOMES MS FOUR
THREE BEDRO'iwo' FLOORS. UN ITS, TOTAL

CONDOMINIUM

ONE BEDROOM

TWO BEDROOM
TOTAL 12

SANTA CLARA
DOWN~~ =CA9l050 . Oll lDllm:ADRD.

SANl'All.ARA,CA~
EE
:7:,-
1 II I Ii i i
I Ii
1 1
iii I ii
i LJ
i:r: ( O I
~ I i ~ i rT7 i(j
i
r
G) PROPOSED 4TH FLOOR

CONDOMINIUM
~E BEDROOM 3 0 BEDROOM 7
TOTAL 10
PLAN

SANTA CLARA
DOWNTOWN =~= . IJ,ll!DIDiIDJ)RD.

SOOAO.o.RA,CA9mo
n,,-.------ 111 I 1 1
i Ii 11
I
i
i
'
'
'
'
i
L~
~ ______ Jl.. ~ ---
""'""'

CONDOMINIUM
~E BEDROOM 0 BEDROOM ~
TOTAL 8 ...,_.,,. . ·=·-~ _;:;
r7I I
iii
i 11
I i 1 1
I Ii
I
I I
i 11
i . . I
Li t1 ii
II
1 1
iii I LJ i:r: (
o II
I~
rTJ
(/) I ---, .
rTJ I )>
0 I
i
CD PROP OSED 6TH FL

OOR PLAN
CONDOMINIUM 3
ONE BEDROOM 5 TWO BEDROOM
TOTAL 8
----111 11 I
I Ii I iii

SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN
~~~~ . M.~A~:o
111 !
i 11 Ii
I
~ iii
iii
i
I Ii I i . j l ' ( ' l:r: . I 0 1 I:;;: . I
I'l l U)
---,
rT7 IEJ
i
i

CD PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
-- -'111 1 l i
' Iii I
SCDC
~OR
~~fabtT8~1~~£i
:.~~~ ~ FA11'(Q)99Ma
"""''

SANTA CLARA
DOWNTOWN _, . ., .. SI.NTA{LI.IA,C.-19'050
. OlllDllm:ADRD.

SOOAl!.ARA,CA~

PROPOSED

ROOF PLAN
EE

CD TOWNHOMES PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION
@ TOWNHOMES PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION
, . . '
""''"~t ;1 .

I ';!• I !--"'----!-
® FIRE DEPARTMENT GROUND LADDER ACCESS
+25'- Q"

MAXHEICHT
FF + 10'- 6"
WD_fLOOR
6 ' TALl
FENCE
FF + 70' - 6"
2N0 FLOOR
® TOWN HOMES PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION
© TOWN HOMES PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION
® FIRE DEPARTMENT GROUND LADDER ACCESS
rF+70'- 6 "
2~0 FLOOR
6'FENCE
FF +o·- o·
1ST FLOOR

BOARD & BATTEN
+ 2s·- o·

MAXHEICHT ----------
FF+ l0'- 6"
2ND B-OOR
SCDC

SAL VA TORE CARUSO
DESIGN CORPORATION 911ELCI.MNlW,L,Jm,S-INTAct..w.,CAffllO ltl.Mt.(4)9'11-Q7 • FAX.Mt.(4)991-d
"""''

SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN
_,,,,, .. S>.NTACUIA.CAm50
. IJ411Dllm:ADRD.

SA.'i'l'AOJ.RA,CA~
c Rom u ,.. o , E u a~ ••
1 ;;..... ..... ,..,, ,.,.. •

PROPOSED

TOWNHOME

ELEVATIONS
EE ~17/2(123
G) 930 MONROE ST
3 EXISTING ELEVATIONS
se...t , ,oc-•·-<1"
G) 930 MONROE ST
3 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
SCALE : 1/r•l'-<I"
G) 906 MONROE ST ~, •I!'.'.·•·~ .. 3 EXISTING & PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 930 MONROE ST

ELEVATIONS
906 MONROE ST

ELEVATIONS
SIDINGTOl,IATCHHIST0RIC

RESOURCE
ALL SIDING A.ts OTRll,IARE
Dll,INUTIVET0HIST0RIC RES0URCE
SCDC

SAL VA TORE CARUSO
DESIGN CORPORATION 911ELCI.MNlW,L,Jm,S-INTAct..w..CAffllO ltl.Mt.(4)9'11-Q7 • FAX.Mo(Q:)991-d
"""''

SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN
..,,..,.,..._.

S>.NTACUIA.Clm50
1l-1110lES1WlRD. • SA.~ACWA,CI~

1. ocMEJ•• ••uu• ~••aoc ............... , ...... .

EXISTING & PROPOSE

ELEVATIONS

HISTORIC HOMES
A3 . 1 b SHEEl'SNSET __ _
PL
0 PROPOSED SECTION B- B
0 0 PROPOSED SECTION A- A
PL
FF +83'- 6 "

MAX HEIGHT
FF + 7.3'- 6"
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~=========================================::=:::==:t,;'.;;::;:::::==:::=============~'!r-1--- R_OQf - - - I
+61 '- Q"
6TH FLOOR
+4 9'-6"
5TH FLO OR
_ +_JS_'._::-~ _ -
4TH FLOOR
I +26' - 6"
-i- - 3RD FLOOR
I
I t +15'- 0" ~======:;;===============================;=ll=::::l;~==;c==ll==;;======~I~ ~m~Fwoo PL
------ ---- - T -
l
I
I
I
FF + 38'-Q"
4TH FLOOR
FF + 26'- 6"
- _)fil)_fl,QQ_.B_
FF + 15' - 0 "
2N D FLOOR F +1 0'-6"
OWN.HO.MES
FF +o' - o" 1 ST FLOOR
FF - 13' - 6"

BASEMENT
I
I
~= + 0 '- 0"
1 ST FLOOR
-13'-6"

BASEMENT
SCDC

SAL VA TORE CARUSO
DESIGN CORPORATION 911ELCI.MNlW,L,Jm,S-INTAct..w..CAffllO ltl.Mt.(4)9'11-Q7 • FAX.Mo(Q:)991-d
"""' '

SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN
_,,,,, .. S>.NTACUIA.CAm50
. IJ411Dl1m:ADRD.

SA.'iTAOJ.RA,CA~
c Romu,.. o , E u a~••
1 ;;..... . .... ,..,, ,.,.. •

SECTIONS
EE ~17/2(123
=°AMGEI. ~mR =°SW,CI( ~rERSTIWCI( Kit 4"7-1 1111 M1S-2 1111 '619-1 ICM 4924-S /
PAINJa> MEW. =°&MD StEET N lllONZE 111141189-1
stucco
THUNDERStlWCk
KM "924-5
--
SHl!E?N""""" =- ICII 4812-2 "'°""'""DOW _,,._
' I FF +8--4-'-8"
I --r ..!<M..!:!E.!,t!I
® PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION (MONROE)
FF +84-8"

MAX HEIGHT
FF +73'-6"
RQQFFF +61'-0"
6TH FLOOR
FF +49'-6"
~T~ .FLQQR
FF +38'-o"
4TH FLOOR
FF +15'-0"
2ND FLOOR
SIUCCO
,,,......,_
.. ....,.., Sll/CCO
"""""""'" ... __. PAINTED METAL SHEET N BRONZE
I I L _________________________________ ~
.............

SHEET N BRONZE
STUCCO
""'"'"""" ICM 4419-1
STUCCO
l<M'824-5 '""""""""' PMOEDMEIH. SIUCCO SHEET ............ IN BRONZE KIi SlttS-2 -

SIIJING
....... , 8'1TENSDIIIG
stuCCO
............
kM 4597•1
SIUCCO
,.,.. .... ,.....,_, SIINGI£ ROOF
I I fF -13'-6"
BASEMENT L------------------------------------------~
G) PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION SCMl:•l/f{'w-1"..fl'
I
I
r
I
I
r I
I
I
I
I
I
...

I
I
I
r
I
I
i
I
I
FF +73'-e•
.BOO[.

FF +61'-0''
~lli..El,Q9.R.

FF +49'-6"
5TH FLOOR
FF +38'-0"
_tT.!:! fLQO~.

FF +2e'-e:"
_JR_P _FLQO~
FF +15'-0"
_WCLELQQR
FF -13'-6"
B.:.SEMENT
....., AND SATTEN SIDING
SCDC

SALVATORE CARUSO
DESIGN CORPORATION MI.OORmt,,_MlifAW&\,CAIM tll.111.--- . W.1111.i'll- ..... ,

SANTA CLARA

DOWNTOWN
_.....,,.

Wfl'AO..W.,Cl.l!llt
........... • SAMl'ACC.W,D.a,a
---= ,w11t11M«nu,1••••- 'rt.1&'.l\ftlllt"""'"'-•
'u'lu.~.111' ~-··-----

MATERIAL BOARD (FOR REFERENCE)
!Ei
•,---------.

A3.3

...,,..
3 ii
i'7' i~
--- - V - ,, -- - ~ 0
i ! ~ /; 3 I
~ ~o
\~- \ ~
~/'n
d f 1i
'
I
'
I ~ '
~I z ,
:o I - 0 s I •
m ,~I
Ill I ' -I " :0
m
m
-I
'
1~~13
I~~~ '!
____ J :_ _ __________ ,Nm'"'~'-•" __ ____ _
~e J7~ I 1=~~!31 HOMESTEAD ROAD II ~- ", c~ '1 !, •••• ==e:=--=.:
-~,~\...c.:c;,
- - =-SM'OB.}~6r 92 (JO~ C~_)~3 --- - ~
-~t;: 11' L._J
,•1\~ Cl.
~~ 11-oi.( '.rr - --,]' f
- 3
m
~!~ c;bz
:i:
'
'
Ii
:I;
'·
I
'
--
I -++-+---f II' •
~
"'·•' . j --~ IJ:r~\ I < •!1''0w:;'!': ~
~
- ------- - --------- N6&'03'26l ,~.U5'
•
r
·~
'
@
!1,h
ll•F
i '
·~ L :, I ' • '" I IC cl-1 I
, I
• t-- a~
I •
I
.,J. i ~~ g_
i:
~-, ~ I
il;_
m rw
C)>
~~;g
►~
.~ ~..,,~--~ .. -<•=·, ~, - - --- - ""~ ~ - -- - - -----"""'"i'-'"-"'..._ _____ _ ~~~~~""~~~~~-==-=-"----- i +
I w
~ ~~ ,z
~
~·
;1
~· >
~
z
'.ti
~'
~
' --=-7dzz~ _J__ _ ~·-·· --__J_ --'~ --_J_ - ';:;iui1JQ'~~90• (JO~OO') Rl .--.~ ,•7 -cv; "D M.-l :r J%. -_ . _ ->c:--:-> ....

J
I
i ~.r - ~
l_ I !~>§ - ~~-~~~t~-+t=====t=~==~
, :!:::..l_ , i,1! - ~ l I _.Liz•- -

FRANKLIN STREET
BA51S~ll£ARINGS
S66'00'4S'w374.90'RaMR1
~
O_
l\) z~CA
0 l~l
0 ~§! ~-
.i
!I
~1 ....
---
~

SANTA CLARA
------------ I
1 •• ~I •~ i , ~• ~i •~ ,_ !a • §._ • ! ! ~
Hio

SANT A CLARA DOWNTOWN PROJECT
906, 930, 940, S. 950 MONROE STREET

PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SANTA CLARA COUNTY
;i 1~ ; ; "I ii h ; ,n d I 1 ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ • ~· :I i -i I I z ~: i. ~ ~ ~ !ii ~ial g g i 0 "1
1 11 h ~ 1 ~ n ~w 1
1 ,
~ ' µ ~ ~ ; i u ~u : i i i
M
.... CALIFORNIA
SAII.JOSE.CA9~112
408- 487- 9199(f"AlC)
...,,..

Wt
,:
"
r!
l
0 '( ;·)~'i' 1:;~ .;• " - - ' I '\ - -
'
Hmf J!>« ::,.;.- ;,;:;;
nl
i: I I 0
z I :0
0 ; 1r :0
m
m
-I
•
;(
I
l
'
I
•ft
ilh, I ~i.1;;11,'l I I .,,. I
iE~ L
'°i-:L ' . II I ~
~ '
~ I I - -!,.:! z f11,i ,< ,,f .L ... , ........
,, :H,Efo, ~ ~-;i~,- 1~el: 1- 1
~1 ....
<,) ; ~CA
0 =
• •
~ • •
•
Ill
I I ·1
~
.. ::.!~· _;_. l. , ,,.. 1· . •
~ - ,1 ·,:<;$.~If'· . I ,
.1 •L ~~ . s
•
i-
~~1 ,,~ - ~1! ' --
~ I~ ~
I"
l .
, I
~
:ii~
~~
i~
c~]~
~
I
~-bi• - 7~ ;i!i! _J ' ; ..

HOMESTEAD ROAD
----------0-·---r-··----
N
ow
~~;i;;
~,z
~
____________ _ J
6l rW
c, ►
~:~
------ --, ------T-------
..
'
I m
'
~~
b' ~~
le
. I
:;;~
'L/_/L,LLL,U.,,',£LLL,C _ _l_ _ -- --_J_ l_ _ --_J_ - . ~ ~ II~ I ~• ~
!!i!~ FRANKLIN STREET
-~?
~~ I --~ •· I ,.. • • i i • •~ 1 ~. s• • • · ! i! . I; i ! ; ~ ! i, ' ~~ ;~ ~ ! ! :!l ;i i !i • ~ ! ~ ~ ;,; I •~ ., ~ , , mz •· < i • ' ' • ' ~ • • C ·~ ! . 0 ' p O §. ~ C g ~ !11 l r ~
! I • I I I I llill@■ •j·,·JL ·.·.;,iji~~l ~I ,,, 1®111·11" "1. ••• • 1 1'' - ~ ! • I I I

SANT A CLARA DOWNTOWN PROJECT
906, 930, 940, S. 950 MONROE STREET

PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
M
.... SAII.JOSE.CA9~112
408- 487- 9199(f"AlC)

SANTA CLARA SANTA CLARA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
i
l
I

NECTION
0 <(
0 a:
0 <(
w
~
1/)
w
::,;
0 J:

I
~:v1:4."t)
, I
j!
GIU'l
~
~ TS
.. V•l!JO.I (ET) !I" P
~-------------------- j ' T I
'
I
' 0 '
I
' '
I APN
269-20-089 DIEAS
26 -1 , ' :-..· ... -'1 ' , I -
M: SECTION A
l ..
- ·-----t
_[] .,
•'i
I

SECTION B
l"•IO' HORIZ
1"•4'YERT

SECTION C
!"•10' HCIRIZ
! "•4'\oERT
j
© BKF ENGINEERS
I~L=E=G=E=N=D========~I ~~;;;~~~~o~ru~\ m"
ST!llMDRAIN(DIRECTION)
STORMDRA!N(PERFOIIATEO)
STORMORAIN(TRE.0.TEO)
STORMDRA!N(UNIREATED)

STORMORAINAAEAORAIN
STORMORA!NBIJOOLEIIB())(
STORMORAINa..EANOIJT

STORMDRAINCATCHBASN
STORMDRf.!NOYERfl.OWORAJI
STORMDRA!NJ:.INCTIONB())(
SANITARY SEWEii CUANWT
SANITARYSEWERMANHa..E
~
-+-so-
~
- t~f - ---.,,:,r-
~soIE\!!

2.l'!RWATERSER\1a:S.r.lAINTAINAMINIMUM
Of l 2'0fYERTICA.l.CLEARAN0::ATWATER
SER'>ia:CROSSINGIIITHOTHERUTI.JTIES.AND
ALL REDUIRED Ml>llMIJl,I ~Ol!IZONTAI.

CLEARANCES: IO'FIIOIISANITARYSE'IIER
UWTIES.10'FIIOIIRECY0..EDWATER
~:~~ ~ = ~~ ,.:~~ER WATE:11
UWTIES.~FROMABANDONEDWATE:11
~i'i'~oJ~~~:f~CTHE
3, l'lR SANITARY SOICR, WATER, A~O REC'!O..EO WATEIIUTIUTIES,MAINTAINAlolN.MUM HOR1ZOMTAI.CLEARANO::OF1!l'FROMEX!STING
ANO P-OSEO TREES. F TREE ROOT BAARIEIIS
AAEINSTALLED,CLEARANO::FRO,i'TREEREDUCES
~•~:~RM~\~Flloic°"'w~EOCE Of
r.o.aune:s).

4. ON-SITE CATOl BASlNSNO .lJNCTION BOXES
SHAU.8£C0NSTRUCTEOPEIITH£ra.LO'IIINC
CIJIOEUNES:
:: ~~i!tl~t~
!!.~ ----------
\ -so- so~so---.:.'
~
~ -:~o.:~;: ·_;.:·= ·- .. if:,~,,,-~
~
I I
' I
I
r
l
l
I
r
I
l
I
i
I
l
I
9 Doto: 03/29/2023 I No.

O_
<,n z~CA
0 !::
0 z
:u
0 m
en
-I
:u
m
m
-I
,,
!ffi ~'."~-ffl1 I i. : (lf=!-=!...._Wlj
~I : i{I~-=-- =-----~
1:~~
~
•' ·
.. ,
:l:1
ni=•
11- -·ID
.,.· 1·: . , . • ·r .·~ :.") ■ ■
? .. :•::~
.:,,: ·•.·'.",<'>
·=· SQ 5D 5D ~'~
--- FRANKLIN STREET
-- -os--os-4"'~;
~ .. 1 ....

SANTA CLARA

SANT A CLARA DOWNTOWN PROJECT
906, 930, 940, E. 950 MONROE STREET

PRELIMINARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN SANTA CLARA COUNTY

HOMESTEAD ROAD
--- ----- . ------r---
I ! I
1 i I
11 i I 1
i '
! !E
~i~ i ~ ! ~
11! 1 h · ! i ~!I. !i 11~~ .,! !!:

Iii! •s 10, 11 .. 1 L I 11•1• II - :h 111
,I, 11•
11 Ii I!! IH'! 'fl i'I 1!li'l'!!11i 1 111i1 ,i ; ·H1,!• p'II j!1L1'ii111! 1!!jl 1 ! 1l !1 :1d1 111l!
pi lie 11i"t
1 11 1! • Ii ! ' ti h 1 1 11 ,1!1!l! () !1 i Ii !I !11j! ,, 11 ' I j !!• II i ! 111 i1jl I 11
llliiil1'i,;1
m•,,, 'i'I I I I ' 1 1 m I!!! r1i) !!!i!1!, •• 1 1111111 i 1:-t iluh1 1 Hi !!',:i 61 ~
!!!I!
31!1
Ill ii
1iil '" iH "I•<
'fl -i H " I I ~ ~u .. . ~ : •p Iii '
\; I
;1 I 11 £1
~I I 11 !
i! ~ @ I ;
§ i i 5!
1'! . !'1 I ,!p
_I I
!i1i,•111 ,. "'j ~a a
,1 !i I . i· ti ~ i ,. ,
" • I
·11z~
i UI
!
..
i!
!" 1111
l"'l@ •• ·ll :1~_ ~ n n :: "= i i
~ LJU i~j ii ~11511" 1 : 1~

CALI FORNIA
A
;.al
17JON. 1STSTREE1
5NIJOGC.CA9~1 12
<Oe-<$7- 91~(rAX)
~i

MEDIA FILTRATION DETAIL
____ .. __ ., __ AITU~Cll>""CIIO • .., __ .. _.., __ 1>001_, _______ _ ------ --------,- -•--1"',r-1 ___ .. -.... __ .,..,
·--- _. __ _
_ .,,n .... --.... ,,q,,0 __ ...,,,.,_,.,_..,...,_ .. ...,,_.,_..,...,1og_1o_,,_, , ...... __ ....... _.,.. __ ,_ ..... _.,""'"' ... __ .......,,... -" _,.. '"'"""'"' ....... """""""'"'--·c.:,,,,,.---· .. _.,., __ !l'MI•---'"'°"""_"'°"...,_., ._ _.,.,..,......, .. ""'mra,u,_ , ... ...-_ .. (,ltlog .. ~ t"' ... ""'"'--""-- ,.,.,,_,_,_,,., ___ .,.""""""""' __ .,. ... .__ ... ._....,._.._,___,.,,._,_.,,......,. • ., __ so...,.. _,.,- -........... ___.... . ....,.,.., ... "'. --- ..--•--"""'oLL .. --··---... ·------ff,_...., .. ..,-......... .,...,. __ ... _,,._, h_,..,,_ , ('5.Sl
____ .,_
............ ,.,_s,,,,om>hOI _ , ......... ----- Lbo _ .. ,.,.,....,_,,_.,,.,,.,.,.._i,o....,.., .. ., __ ,_,,,_ ___ .,,, ·--.. ""- ,.,s,,.._,.,,_s,,,,..,,,, · •• "-·-..-... - ..... ~ .. - .... .. _..,..., ..... ___ ,., homodtoca,tr_ . ._....., __ ,...... ,.""" _,._""_ .... ......,_ .. ,_ . ,_, ... ,.._"" ....... ___ """"" __ ,. __ ,._,.....,..., , ... .,_,,.,..,,,,..,, .... _,,, _"""' . "'""""''° "'_, ., ...,,.,,....., __ low ____ , ,.._ .. ___ ..,, .. _~ .. ----... ,-_., .. ,.. .., .. _,........., ""'""""'"_,. _____ .. _, __ . ,.,c.a, __ , ... ..,,, ....... ,.11 .... ---.... """--""-.. --..--""-'""'"""''""_""_ 2.,., .................... A. e:,,,c,,..«,_,S<:«-o<Fluotion! ........ w(l-to"5lMC<'9.~Tond Cl!Sllond.-""""----·
, . ., ....... ,.,,..,.,....,,..,_,,. ...... ,,_,,,. . , ......, ,.....,,.,HSl0-'4(MS181'°"""11-•"'-- o, ,i.;,,,,,,,,, --·- 2.S«< ........ __ ,,.,,,_ .. ___ ,....,. __ --.,I0"5TM C990
.

3.C.....>hol! .... _,,,,""'""".,. .. ,,... ,1 .. .., l'DrtLaod--_, ___ ..,. ___ MlMC150. ,.,, .. _ ... , ...,...,,,_ .... ,._,...,.....,.,,..._ ... .cw ... r211 -1•- ---....- 5.f'i00~ ...... .,,..., __ .,,... __ ,..,,._11/. ........ , .. -...,. .... c .......... .,..........,..,,_......_,.,..,,.. ll.->hOIL-,..,,,to"5,MCa:l, __ ..,,_. _..,.,.....ion
-""-·
'-t _";\"'D~ ,""':. -= ......
_(11, ... .., ___ ..,, 1. ____ .. __ ,o<$1MAlt .. ••· .. -- 1 -I0"5 ~111< ___ TM Alle"'A'9?,c,_,O_oo,,--.,,o.t.STMAlll _...,,. .. ., __ ...,.t.STMA ... CUDI 1:. flf;~;::~~§~;~
ll. :=.2:.,~-ond--,o<$TMAl40 """"'"""'
,..,, ____ ............. .,_.,__,_,,_f,,.,,_
,..,._,,11.w.-lao-""""""""'O,-thlE-l.""""'""',,,-0,-
l,Tho-~--•-bo!_Of_,_ .. '"":io, """"'""'-""'-•"'.'ST><A2"° ,. ... ,.~---..... .., .... - ...... -"" .. "'"',;g,, ..,,..,__,,.C>D'II-•""'"""""..,_,.,,.. __ .,,.,_.,._ --(Ul----•-e,,,;_,._.,, __ """""''"'-""'"'" __ ,, ___ .,,,,,......,, .. 11 ....11;_.,.,,...-,,....,11..,.11"---l."""'"l"·--I-"" IP"'l-eo<t-1,0,,,-,,_,_.,.,_..,.,......,_ 3.Tho,.. --................... _ .. _"""""""" ~.,.th>E- a. -""'1< 11 .. .-.......... .,_ - ...... , ---- ___ ..,,_ """"°~""ll.~to t.5 <bl~l,,.,..,ld<,,_,......,~""""'"""'II _ , o.,o....,..,_..,,-..,,u.s._,,._ ··---.. --.. .-.. _""" __ .. _ -""'·-"'"""""' ___ _ ,..~--,-...... -, . ,..,., ..... "8....,,.....,.,...,_,,...,....,, ..... _,.,,_,u.s.so..-d .._,,....,,_.,,us_,oi_....,,_,_ .,_,.........,""' ,_.,, ,_,.....,, __ 1.0 001.2....,._ ~ ......... -.. _=_ .. ..._., _,......,,..,.,29toJJ'""" - °"'"'"'""'_,_oc1n,, l __ w,_...,,,.......,,....,_,.,, """'-•""'' _,u.s.s...-,,,,_,.....,_,_..,,u.S ,..,_.<ll_ d ....,,....,(ZPCl, ZPC ,.,_,,__.,,._,.,.,,,,,,.......,, ~ ...... 1 ..... 1--,.-1--1-~ ....... - .. c,,..,., ._-.-.. !ZF'tZP~,....,,,,_,.,,,.,,.. .. _ .. ,..._., ,... .. l--lond""'1bl--> .. ____ so.,_ .. ___ .. _., __ ., .,,.,..._, ___ 1,ss:""'-""'O!<'l......,....,. .. 10"""""'- ........_ rss,_..,. _,,...,..,,_..,_,_,,.,., _ __ _...,_1,:_,..b....,..,...Ol."9>",ond._,_,._,_,..,,_,..., .....,...,..._...,_, ___ .. .,......,.. ... :n. ............ ___ .... ,..,,,,.,.,_,,.,._...., __

1.1--
1,2 --,.

1.e o,,,.,..,,s.,.,v,--
" n., __
,..,_ )1.2.,_ ...
s•n-
:,.u.,_.,._ _ lO~
SH~$<-
HS..,.,...
l•IBo«,flllog Hl.l- s,a1-.,,;,,g_s.e,._1o,,_
,.,,,_ .. °""""""'"_
.. _OlllO•-•SnooC>.._,_,0o,,.,,._ B. -OlllO•b.t_._E_..,,,,_...._,.,.,,._ c.-mro-,-..onc1_c..n<!lno."'""v5- 1.t -1 .. ---·-..... ·---·-_.,,,,.., __ ....
2 .... ;~l~f!t _, ....... __
'"'-~""""°---Htra<ion->holl .. _to_O,- ""'E.-.-·-~,.;.:,..,ot""'""'""""' ., __ :on..,__.,...,.,. .. ,.,.... ... _ '"'...... -"'""S,,,C, """"'"""""""- !-- ---~ noo '-""""--.. -· --....... ~"'" ·--.. -..... --- .. ..,, ,._,.,,.,._ ..., .. ...,...., ... i.. __ _ ...,. ... ,-- .. c..-,;,.., __ __ ,...,._ ......... ._..~.,,,, - , .. ...,_ ... _ ..... ....... _ .. .,,, ____ .,.,,,, __ .. __ _ B .,,,_,,,_,h,,t'-"~"""•-""""o~o.;,,,;,,.,,.,,g111,,,on;,-""'""' c. .,,,
--·- __ .,,,. ..... ,,.,..,. ................ l'l .... o.o•-~12-. o..,,,_..., ....,,_ __ 21..,..-.....,,om.,....1.-· ""'"'""""'>holl.,_ ond_ .. _.,,,, .. _ _., __ ~- .. .,,, ............ ___ ,_,_, .. __ .. _ .. _ ,_._ .. __ _ •·"'1-.... •-·-~-""''"'_ .. _,..._ .. _ .... _.. __........,...,,_.~~------ .,_"""""''"
___ ,,.,...,,..__ ........ .,.__,..,. .... - ·
___ --...,_..,.,..,,.,.....,..., ,· . ., __ ,_ .. _,,,...,,, , ... ,,,_ .., "'°"" ___ '""'""'·"'""'"""""'"'-"'""""" _,,"'.,..,.. .. _.,.____ ,_ I> ... .. --~--.... '-'-""""•~•O) o AASl<IOM!O' - G,o,--e..t"1;, D,,,,__Soo;otyblH<""""'-t,\.STM)
•"5""""-ct..X9· 0,.,--C,., .... 0 ASTM W · --,--b.,,,.,.,, __ ~ ASTMA18'·--W'n-..._,._.,,"""'-
O ASTM ••98 - S<NI ....... Dtb-moo.k<C.,,,,,,o-
, . ASTI<MaT•--w .. --...... .. """'-
( "5TI<M!,ll - --- ---C.--S:Nl ...... to,c..-,;,..,- ~ A51MBIOll·---S--,,,_ h. ._.,Mca2 -----f«mcto,-o,...._,I l I.STMCU9-e...o,-m-,.....,bConw.<tlonolCOld,_...,_ j."5TMC150•-- ~ "51MC<11---C.OOC..,,-So<!-
t <$lM~---C.,,., m"5TMC1!11--S<-Daolgt,..-ig.,....,.___c.:,,,,,. Ut'-"•-- "- ASTM C911·----,S<- ~ ASTM OILil-_....., .. ._._--utk•1Sltuc:I..,.. ; ~5,¥r~_;-;,;;;:~
,._ .. _,,_, .. ...,..,...,eono-"'"~-,..,s.e,:ono1m--.. .. ,., •• .,,u,,..,,,.,"'_,, --~s.- 1.--IO-but""-.Oto .. -r,,,,. ___ ond """"'"""_
, __
J.--.- -. ..... , ~-·""'"" .. ..-.. - ___ ...... , .. , __ .,. __ .. ,.._,..,....., ... _,,. .. _ ... __ _ --·"'-'""'"''"'•-""'"'"""""'"""""" ,Opo,t,..,, __ B ____ __,.,..lon.,_,_,_ .... __ IO,W.--o, --"-""""''"'~"'""""""'"'·- ,._tll.....,, ....... -. ? !_pol_ .. __ 3..,.......,_ ,o,,.,.,..1on .. -......, __ c.-.-.. ___ .. ____ .,...,_,._, __ ,...,.,.._,.., .. __ .,. ___ ... _____ _ _(II,,..., __ .... , .. 1 ........ , ........ _..,_,,..,., ____ .,.,...,,,_ -..--... -..._ .. _..._.,, ... o,«lu:t ___ .. """"""'"""'"'" __ .. ,_,, ... _o,,.,,_.,_, .. _ .. ;~J."~~::==-~=~~ ,....,.,_.......,.., ---.... ...... -_,,., _ ....
_____ .............. __ ,,., ... _ .. ____ - .. -·°""'""'"'""""'-"'""' .. .....,_,. ,,, ................... _ ........... ,,_ ......... ... ..... ........... _,,--.iog.., , ............ _____ ..._,..,,,.,,,_ _ __,,,..,_,_._.,.,,_.,,,.,_PO«,,.,.,,.,_..

C ;;;~.:;_.:;-~;:~
--~·~-.. -----""'"'1"'- A.CIO""'<o,-~- ... -ionolt"'_ ...... _,,_.,_ ~ . -··"'"',. '"""'""""'""'""----..... .. _ ........ -~ ... _. ....__,._ ..... , .............. ---· ---· .. ...
""'-·-''""-·~"""-· •---'-""·----' .... -~- .. ____ .,..., ______ _ """'"'"""' -·-"""'"""""'""' __ .,.......,. A" .,.....,_,, .. .,,.,..., .. """"' __ '-'°"' ·_"''"""' ...... .. _.,...,,,_bolo-,_....,,.,,._ .... .,,,..,,......__ ....... , -., · 4,0..,.,, ,.,.. ___ ., _"""'. ol ""'""'·-~--, ...... ,.., ...... .,. ................. _log ____ ,.,..,,._.,."_.,,_., ,.....,,. , ...... _.,_.,, __ .. ____ ,,, ...------·--·---""' __ .,,,,,. __ ,i_io.Jm/. __ ...,, ... , .... ..,.,, ... ondo.f ___ ion02'.l(X)"to,-- .. ....... - ~--.. .............. ._.,.,_.,._..,. .... _ """""·"--"'""'(-.I>--., .... -"""""' .......... ,........, .... -.2, ....... - ..... """""'"' © BKF ENGINEERS
C5.1
.__ __________________________________________________________________________ L_ __ ...J Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Materials & Waste Management
No n-El aza rdou.s Materials
D Berm and CO\'er stockpiles or sa.rd. dirt or othc.rconstruction material \\~lh tarps when rain is forecast or when they are not in use.

D Use (b111 don·, ovemse) reclaimed water for dust control.

D Ensure dust control water docsn·1 lca\·e site or discharge to stonn drains
Hazardous Materi als
D Label all hazardous materials and ha7 .ardons wastes (such as pesticides. paints, thinners, solvents, fue l. oil. and antifrcc7..e) in accordance with City. County. State and Federal regulations.

D Store hazardou s materials and wastes in water tight containers, store in appropriate secoJXlary comainment. a.rd cover t11c111 al the end or every work day or during wel weather or when rain is forecasl D Follow manufacturer's :1pplic:11 ion instmctions for hazardous materials ant do not use more than necessal')'. Do not apply chemicals outdoors when r:iin is forecast within 24 hours.

D Arrange fo r appropriate disJX)sal or all hazardo11s wastes.

Waste !\1:magcmcnt
D Cover aJXI maintai n dmnpstcrs. Check freque ntly fo r leaks. Place dumpsters under roofs or cover with tarps or plas1ic sheeting secured around the outside oft.he dumpster. A plastic liner is recommended to pre,·cnt leaks. Nc,·crc lean out a dmnpstcr by hosing ii down on the 0 Place JX)rtable 1o ile1s away from stonn drains. Make sure they are in good working order. Check freque ntly for leaks.

D Dispose of all \\astes and demolition debris properly. Recycle materials and wastes that c:111 be recycled. including solven1s, waterbased paints. \'chicle fluids, broken asph,-i lt and concrete. wood. and cleared vegetatio1t
D Dispose or liquid residues fro m paints, thinners. solvents. glues. and cleaning fluids as hazardous waste
D Keep si1c free or liner (e.g. lunch i1ems. cigarelle buns) □ Prcvenl litter from tmcovered loads by covering loads 1h,.-it are being transported to and from site.

Co nstruction Entnmccs and Perimeter
D Establish and maintai n cITective perimeter controls and stab ilize all constmction cntra1x:cs and ex its to suffici ently comm! erosion and sediment discha rges from site and tracking off si1e
D Swee p or \':ICUll/11 any streel trncking immedi:ne ly and secure sediment source to prevent further tracking. Never hose down streets to clean up tracking.

Construction projects are required to implement year-round stormwater BMPs.

Equipment Management &
S11ill Control
MaintCDlUlCC ;md Parking
□ Designate an area of the constmction site. well away
fro m streamsor stonn drain inlets and fitted wil..11
appropriate BMPs. for auto and equipment parking.
and storage.

D Pcrfo nn major maintenance, repair jobs. and ,·c hicle and equipment washing off site.

D If refueling or vehicle maintenance must be done
onsitc, work ina be rmcd area awav from storm drains
and over a drip pan or drop cloths ·big e1xmgh to collect fluids. Recycle or dispose or lluids as hazardous waste D Ir vehicle orequip1ucnt cleaning must be done onsite. clean wi1h watcr onJy ina benned area that wi ll oot
allow rinse water to nm into gutters, stree1s, storm
drains. or surface waters
D Do oot clean ve hicle or equipment onsitc using soaps, sol\'ents. degreasers. or ste1.1 111 cleaning equipment. and do 001 use diesel oil to lubricate equipment or parts
onsitc.

S11ill Prc,·ention an d Contro l
D Keep spill cleanup materials (e.g .. rags. absort>ents and cm litter) available at the constmc1ion sile at all times.

D Maimain au \'Chicles and heavy cquipmen1. Jnspec1
frequenl.ly for a1xt repair leaks. Use drip pans to catch leaks until repairs are made.

D Clean up leaks. drips and other spi!Js immcdi:nely and dispose or cleanup materials properly.

D Use diy cleanup methods wltene,·er JX)SSible
(absorbent materials. cat litter and/or rags).

D Swee p up spilled di)' materials inuncdiatcly. Never
allempl to .. wash them away•· with wmer, or bury
them.

Earthmoving
Grad ing .1 nd Ea rthwork
D Schedule gmding and exc,1vation work
during dry weather.

D S1abilizc all denuded areas. install a1x:t
mainla in tcmpor:uy erosion controls (such
as erosion control fabric or bonded fiber
matrix) until vegetation is establislted
D Rcn-10,·c ex isting \'Cgctation on..ly when
absolutely necessary, plant temJX)rary
\'Cgctation for erosion co atrol on slopes
or where constrnctio n is oot immedi:uely
plamv:d
D Prc\'ent sediment rrom migrating offsite
and protect stonn drain inlets. drainage
coluseS and streams by installing aOO
maintaining approprime BMPs (i.e. sill
fences. grave l bags. fibe r rolls. temporary
swalcs.c1c.)
D Keep cxcm·ated soil 011 site and transfer it
10 dump 1n1cks on si1e. not in the streets
Co nt;1minatcd Soils
D lf:my of llte followingcorditions arc
observed. test for co ntamination and
contact the Regional Water Quality
Control Board
- Unusual soil conditions. discoloratio1t
or odor.
- Abandoned underground tanks
- Abandoned wells
- Buried barrels, debris. or lraslL
D If the above co1xti1ions are obset\1ed
document any signs of polcmial
contamination and clearly mark !hem so
they arc oot distmrbed by constmction
activi tie s.

Concrete Management
and Dcwatering
Concrete M;1 nugcmcnt
D Store both dry and wet materials under
cover. pro1ec1ed from mi nfall and nmorr and
away from stonn drains or waterways. Store
materials off1he ground. on pullets. Protect
dry materials from wiJXI.

D Wash down exposed aggregate co1x:re1e
only when Lite wash water can ( I) flow onto
a dirt area: (2) drain onto a benned surface
from which ii can be pumped aJXI disposed
or properly: or (3) block any stonu drain
inlets and \'acuum washwatcr from the
guucr. If possible. sweep first.

D Wash out concrete cq11ipmen1/tnicks offsitc
or in a designated washout area onsite.
where the waler wi ll flow into a temporary
waste pit, and make sure wash water does
rot leac h into the underlying soil. (See
CASQA Constmc tion BMP HaJXlbook for
properly designed cooc rctc washouts.)
Dcwatcrin ~
D Discharges of gromidwater or captured
nmoff from dewmering operations must
be properly managed and disJX)sed When
possible. send dcwatering discharge to
laixtscaped are;:1 orsan itaiy sewer. If
discharging to tJic sanitary sewer. call your
local wastewater 1reatmcn1 plant.

D Diven run-on water from ofTsitc away from
all disturbed areas.
□ When dewalering. notify and obtain
approval from lhe local municipali1 y before
disc harging water to a street guuer or stonn
drain. Filtration or diversion through a basin.
t:mk. orsedimen11rnp may be required.

Paving/Asphalt Work
Pa,>ing
□ Avoid paving and seal coating in wet
weather or when rain is forecast. 10
prevent materials that ha\·e not cured
from co ntacting s1ormwater rnnolT.
□ Cover storm drain inlets and manholes
when apply ing sea l coat. slurry seal, fog
seal, or similar materials
D Co llect and recycle or properly dispose of
excess abrasive gravel or sand. Do NOT
sweep or wash it into gutters.

Sawcutting & Asphalt/Concrete Rcmo,•al
D Protect stom1 drain inlets during saw
CUii ing
D Ir saw cut slurry en1ers a c:nch basi1t
clean it up immediately
D Shovel or vacu um saw cut slurry deJX)sits
a1xt remove from the site. When making
s:1w cuts. use as little water as possible.

Sweep up, and properly disJXlse of all
residues
Painting & Paint Removal
Pa inti ng Cleanuf) and Remova l
D Ne,·er clean bmshcs or rinse paint
contamers 11110 a street. guucr. storm
drain. or stream.

D For water-based paims. paint out bmsltes
to lite extent possible. aixt rinse into a
drain that goes to the sanital')' sewer.

Never JX)Ur pailll down a storm drain
D For oil-based paints. paint out bmshes lo
the e'.\1ent JX)ssible and clean with thinner
or solvent in a proper contailter. Filter aixt
reuse thinners aixt solvents. Dispose or
excess liquids as hazardous waste.

D Sweep up or collect pain! chips and dust
from non-ha711rdous d1y stripping and
sand blasting into p..lastic drop cloths and
disposeor astrnsh.

D Chemica l paint slfipping residue and chips
and dust from marine paints or paints
containing lead. mercury. or tributyltin
mus! be disposed of as hazardous waste.

Lead based paim re.moval requires a statccenifi ed comractor. □ Clean up spil ls on din areas by digging up and
properly disposing of cont:uuinated soil. Landsca1ling
D In areas or known or suspected
co ntam.ination. call your local agency to
determine whel.her the ground wale r must be
tested. Pumped groundwater may ~cd to be
co llected aixt hauled ofT-si1 e for lfeatme1u
and proper disposal.

Pollution Prevention Program
D Report significam spills to the appropriate local spill resJXlnse age,x:ics inunediately. IJthe spill JX)scs a
significant lm7..rd to luunan health and 5,1fety, property or 1hc environment. you must report it to the Staie
Office of Emergency Services. (800) 852-7550 (24
hours)
D Protect stockpi led laOO.scaping materials
from wi nd and min by storing them under
tarps all yea r-round ..

D Stack bagged material on pallels and
under cover.

D Discontinue applica1ion of any erodible
landscape material within 2 days before a
forecast rain cve111 or during wcl weather.

Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $10,000 per day! (i:) SKF ENGINEERS
C6.0 ffi ._ _______________________________________________________________________________________ ...... ___ .....

TYPICALAERIALNXESSSECTION
--
' a
- _....... ..:::=- -~~ c
MONROE STREET (F"IRE ACCESS ROAD)
FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS:
l'Ellm'T-"GE Clf MSDOT/IST flOOII (!)po I-A): 31,7118 / 1B,0211 • PE~lff-"'1[Clf(>-fll:Rl'l!IAIIM(T,... ._A):M.m/illl.OU• IIEDU(DF1R[flOIIPEIIOONSTIIICTIQITl1'£1-••-sr (T'8..EIIUlll.1(2,)}1.ooo R (l"iollow~J,500Cl'll:25S""'""'1<11-~cn: , .... 11ou. ......... ... .... ,,cmCPII) fK flOII Put CO<Sl!U:1D l'll'C --• • N.022 Sf (TMLE 8106.1(2)~ 1.125 Cl'¥ (N ... ~ .. ,OOCfftl::ZS--~cn: ,_8!CIU."""'""' .. ... ...... ,,cmCPII) ~
• -·1-S!Gt"flM.LIIIC(l)llo"""I):

IOTIII.FlREflOll(T.aEIIDS.1(2))•
IIUII.DtlG 1 ~•1.J1!1D lll'guro(]IFIIEfl0WIOIIEOSlllrta fR lflDIINITCIII.CUI.J,.T10C ~r:"~W~1%,~~~~~c.f:-~) - •-s>N.MillUIWllnlllW'~
- - lll!!TNG:(fRCllNffl'l'»<TCIISIIEETOl!IICWlfllONTl,(£10•Flt) llllfBOtClfDOSIK"IIE!llOll#ll5: =~n:~$11Ul)
(M.CNCHCllfS!OOIIOMl)
{N) MIXED-USE BUILDING
ROOF ELEVAllON: 73.5'
LEGEND
(E)
FH
(E) FJ;r'.:~ ~ ·------ ~ --------------------------. . -- (.
© BKF ENGINEERS
.,..

GRAPHIC SCA.LE
t;W' T i
C7.0
~i '------------------------------------------------------'------' l
PROJECT SUMMARY:

1. O'M'-IER/SUBOIIADER: LAhlB PARlNERS LLC.
535 MIDOLEAELD RD, SUITE 190
MENLOPARK, CA94025

2. MAP PREPARED BY: BKF ENGINEERS CONSULTING ENGINEERS
17J0 N.FIRSTSTREET,SUITE600 SAN JOSE, CA 951 10
(408) 467-9100
COHACT: PATRICK CHAN, P.E. (LICENSE# C8J189)
J. GEOTECHNICAL ENG.: CORNERSTONE EARTHGROOP
1259 OAKt.lEAD PARKWAY
SUNNYVALE, CA 94085
(408) 245-4620
COOTACT: MAURA F. RUFFATTO, P.E.

4. APN 269-20-086/087/095

5. GENERAL PLAN USE: COMMUNITY MIXED-USE

6. EXISTING LAND USE: COMMERCIAL ANO RESIDENTIAL USE

7. PROPOSED LANO USE: l,HXED-USE (RESIDENTIAL/MULTl- fAt.llLY ANO COMMEROAL/RCTAIL-RESTM.IRMH)

8. EXISTING ZONING: HT- HISTORICAL COMBINING
(906 MONROE ST. AND 1341 Ha.lESTEAO ST., APN 269-20-095):

OG-GENERAL omcE
(930 MONROE ST,. APN 269-20-087);
CC- COl,OilUNITY COMMERCIAL
(940-950 MONROE ST., APN 269-20- 086);

9. REZONING: PLANNED 0E\-ROPMENT

0.88 ACRES (38,217-SF)

SILTY CLAY LOAM/SANDY LOAM
1J. DEPTH TO GROUNOWAlER: 12- n

14. Fl.000 ZONE ELEVATION: ZONE X

15. NUMBER OF STORY: 1 LEVEL Of BASEMENT
TO\IJNHa.tES: 2 STORIES (ABOVE GRADE)
CONOOMINIUM: 6 STORIES ("801£ GRADE)

16. OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-2 (5 STORIES Of RESIDENTIAL. 2 STORIES OF RESIDENTIAL), A-2 (GROUND LE'.fi.) ANO S-2 (PARKING AT BASEMENT LEVEL)

17. TYPE Of CONSlRUCTION: TO\IJNHa.tES: V-A
CONOOMINIUM: I-A FOR BASEMENT ANO GROONO LE1£1.. V-A FOR UPPER

18. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER:

19. PROPOSED HEIGHT:

NO. OF CONDOMINIUM UNITS PROPOSED:

NOTES:
,i:s
74'-0"
60 CONDOMINIUM UNITS PROPOSED LOT 1- 55 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS 1 CONDOMINIUM UNIT FOR AU. Fl.OCR COMMON AREAS
2 BASEMENT PARKING GARAGE CONOC»,HNIUM UNITS
3 RETAIL C<»IOOMINIUM UNITS
LDT 2- (E) SINGLE FAMILY HOME
LOT 3- (E) SINGLE FAMILY HOME

1. THE FILING Of THIS VESTING lENTATIVE MAP IS CONCURRENT TO THE PLANNED OE'.fi.OPMENT REZONING ANO THE PLANNED OE',£1.0PMENT PERMIT PLN2020-14-457.

THOSE PLANS ANO STANDARDS 'MLL BE INO..UOEO IN THIS SUBMITTAL

2. THIS MAP PROVIDES FOR THE CREATION OF TWO SEPARATE LOTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ANO A SINGI.£. OEVELOPABLE LOT TO BE FURTHER SUBOMOEO VIA SEPARATE RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM MAP INTO 60 C(l,IQQMINIUM UNITS.

3. UTILITY OEOICATia-1S: THE a.I-SITE STORM DRAIN. SANITARY SE\11£R, ANO WAlER SYSlEMS 'MU BC PRIVATELY MAINTAINED.

4. ANY EXISTING Yi£LL(S) ON THE SUB..ECT PROPERTY: TBO.

5. ANY POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AREAS \111THIN ANO ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED SUBOIVISION ANO ON I.ANOS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT THERETO: Na.IE.

6. NO EXISTING PUBLIC OR PRIVATE EASEMENTS Of UTILITY, DRAINAGE, SEWER, PARl<ING ACCESS ANO OTHER PURPOSES.

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP

MONROE STREET

FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
906, 930, 940 & 950 MONROE STREET
AND 1341 HOMESTEAD STREET
CITY OF SANT A CLARA, CALIFORNIA 95050
PLN2020-14457
' ' ' ' ' '
_ -2..._ -~ _____ _
7 4 269-1~084 (RESIDENCE)
f APN 269'-,~0-085 "" -------- ~~rs~rBE 1 REMO'v£0 APN 269-20-086 I' 1 LAMB PARTNERS. LLC I (0.52AC.) I
LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1·-so·-0·
BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARING OF S66'00'43"W ALa.lG THE CENTER LINE Of FRANKLIN STREET. BE~ MADISON STREET ANO MONROE STREET AS SHO\IJN HEREa-1, ANO AS SHO\IJN a.I BOOK 442 OF MAPS. PAGE 26.

BENCHMARK: THE BENCHMARK USED FOR THIS SURVEY IS BENCHMARK A-9, FOUND AT BENTa-1 STREET ANO MONROE SlREET, SE COONER, Ta> Of l£TTER ·c• IN ~O "CAL" ON Ta> Of CATCH BASIN HOOO.

ElEVATia-1 • 78.21 FEET (NA\.088 DATUM)
UTILITY COMPANY:

1. ELECTRICITY SILICON VALLEY POl'IER

2. GAS
J. WATER ANO SEYl£R CITY OF SANTA Cl.ARA,
WATER ANO SEv.£R DEPARlMENT
I
MISSION TRAIL WASTE SYSTEM (a..EAN GREEN)

5. RECYCUNG RECOI.OGY SILICON VALLEY
AC
AD
APN
BLDG
BM
C&G
c,a.

CON
CR
eve
DIA
DWG
ECR
EL
EP
gc
F/C
FT
t'
LI'
!J ! \ i ! l /!. 8 ~ ~
1rti-,i!-5\

STREET CENTER LINE
a
I MINETA SAN JOSE INTERN!il~~f Ci

VICINITY MAP
NTS

SHEET INDEX
TM-1
TM-2
WOlllfllllli
Tin.ESHEET

SITE PLAN/MAP SHEET
<!) BKF ENGINEERS

ABBREVIATIONS

ASPHALT CONCRETE
AREA DRAIN ASSEsSOR·s PARCEL NUMBER

BUILDING

BENCH MARK BACK OF WALK/ BOTTOM OF WALL

CURB & GUTTER CENTERLINE

CONCRETE

CURB RETURN

CENTER OF VERTICAL CURVE

DIAMETER
ORAlll1NG
ENO Of CURB RETURN ELEVATION

EDGE OF PAVEMENT ENO VERTICAL CURVE EXISTING
FACE Of CURB
FEET
LEFT
LEHGTI<

LINEAR FEET
lilllEillL
LG
MH
MON
(N)
N.A.V.D.

N.G.V.O.

NO., I NTS
P.A.E.

PCC
PL
" PV
R
RCP
RT
ROW
(S)~S.

S,,
STO
SW
S.W.E.
"' UGEE · .,
W/
(W)
W.U.E.

UP OF GUTTER MANHOLE

MONUMENT

NORTH/NEW

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL OATIJM

NATIONAL GEODETICS VERTICAL DATUM
NUMBER

NOT TO SCALE

PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PROPERTY LINE "'"' PAVEMENT
RADIUS

REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
mGHT

RIGHT OF WAY
SOUTI<
STREET

STANDARD

SIDEWALK
SIDEWALK EASEf.lENT

TYPICAL UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL EASEMENT
VERIFY IN FlELD ~Tl<
WEST

WATER UTILITY EASEMENT
cmrn=ICATU I APPROVALS
0,-,;,wlng Number.
i-, TM-1
Iii ..._ _____________________________________________________ ..L. _____ LJ.1..!"'~2:..J l
i-i
Iii

2. MJ.DISTNIC£SM(IQalENSIONSll!l.:9!0MIII FEET NGDC<:lrilll..SllOEW.

APN
269-22-107 /108/109/110/111

GRAPHIC SCALE
e,
I APN 21?9-20- 085 KAUTERNA
APN 269-20-086
LAMB PARTNERS. LLC
I+, ' .f,, I, .t
lii: 1 'i Ii[ m,,_ 3.4 ~'..,I ~-~ '~I
~
r 1''
0 \
I xe;,
1~111
I
I ~ \0
t
I
~
f I
·=---- ----- --- +-----.-,~,., _,©
~R
,· • r
I
-
)
. ~ i::=::::J.._
=
X81.7
Q ~'·.~ -- x 4 •871 [
I fil---===--@J
,--------L
!LEGEND
SNITARY SE'IIERa.EAHOUT

SANITAAY SE'IIERWANHOLE

S'IORMDRAINCATQI BASIN
SIORII DRAIN 0flOP INLET
SroRMDRAIMMANHOLE
coorn:SIDEWMJljPA\OIOIT
.........
(ATCl."8-)
(iRl).MIEl.£Vl ll(II
....... ..,.,, .... _ _, ....... ..,.,,
----
----
----
-----
))))))//jj))))))/
--x--
J=a
-(le
---•--
--L--
--o--
--so--
--ss--
,-,--11'--""'
[oiiJ
•
C
,I'
8 • Ii:
8 0
()
0 ~ 1-.,:. ·' ;.;, :~·.,,, -,: ·.: ·1 -
111ml
J:::::::::::)\
x84.0
CJ
<!) BKF ENGINEERS
cmrn=ICATU I APPROVALS
0,-,;,wlng Number.

TM-2
2 "' 2
7 '"""'-""
OOSTIIC CMJIIOO Lt(
'"""'""" ,. .... OOSTIICEl.£CIRICVMII.T
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:

MADISON ST
I ""T')
::::0
)>
:z
;:,;;:

I + ~ l
•~---I~ !
. 1 i
eosro uGE, r I H CL TO P/l?
l I
I I
~
2 I 2 ~IUD,,:~ ~iei-oom 1~ I ~~~!'~ tlWPO.E
i"' 10 """"'" MONROE ST ~t ~ r=~ H
I
I
..
'"''
--,
GENERAL NOTES:
_L_ •INOICATESI-IOTEISl!£QUll!ED FORTHIS J08
....!...,_ SERVICE \oOLTAGE SHALL BE _-_ V, -=- W-=- • (PER UNIT) ...!..,_ AVAILABLESHORTCIRCUITIS_. _AMPSSYI.IMETRICAL
..L_ AUME'TERSMUSTBEGROOPED A.NDACCESSIBI..ETOTENANTS.o.NDTilE UTIUTYAT ALLTIMES _L_ ~~OfE~'!i~~~~C~~ ~~~ :~j~~~~~~~~~G'i'1RE\IISI~ 0
_L_ ~~1~11£t:~s0(:icfc~!crl;'if5p~~~K:;1 ~iE:;o~lNG
2-_ a¥o:~E~%i~:fil\:~:R=~v~~:
0 :~::::~~ ::~·.:;: ...~:::
..L_ CUSTOMERTOflU.OUTLOAOSUR\/EYf OllM(COPY ATTActlEO)-.,THCOMPLETrLOADBREAKDO'/ltlS, SER',IICEOATE. SIZEANONUUBEROfSER\IICEENllUNCECONOUCTORS(PERBLDG,) _L_ ELECIBICALPE!IUITS FORS&\llct:ENTIU.tlCE.o.NDOTHERP!llVATEELECTRICALwalKSHALLBE 08TAINEOFROM1HECITYPERMIT CENTERPRIORTOSTAATOf''IIORl(ORPROVIDE LETTER FROM ..L_ ~~~~ !~~ ~ ~~:~ :;on:~TMBA\ ~f~~~,Joug~:iiM~Gr ~::~~NENT _L_ ~~~ ORsi:~o~~l~u~i 1~;~ ~~ ... ~~~~-~: 1~. ~~~ I~ ACCOl!OAtlce:
..L_ PRO\IIOEREOv,,:)()[)HE:ADERSORCONfORML..AtlDSCAPE:MOUNDSTOAYOIOCO\'ERiNGD..ECTRICAL PUU.OOXES ANO VAULTS. TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM or s·- o· FROM CENTER UNe: or TRENCH ..L_ ~~cf~[i~ffJf ~i1~:JC:f;~~REE~~i;~ rs~~u~l:fil~EUTRAL ...L.. SEE UG1000.R'E\IISION5.SHEET9f ORUTIUTYINSPECTKtlS. CALl.(408)640-6:,02 ...!..._ fOR ALl."M)fll(INTI-IEPIJBUCRIGHT-or-wAY.08TAIN REOUIREDSlREETOPENINGPERMITFROM TI-IE CIT'!" PEIWITCEtHER. TREES SHAU. B£ A M.NIMUM or~- fl'tOM CENTER.INE or TRENCH ..L_ PRIORTOAtlYEXCAVATION.CAU.UNOERGROIJNOSER\IICEALERT(U.S.A.)AT(800) 227-2600 ..L_ COORDINATEWORK....,TI-IUNE:MAINTENANCEANDCONSTRUCTIONDI\IISION AT (408)615---5600.

LEGEND
NEWnNST ALL EXISTING
C0M'.IUITS'IRENlfflAU.PERNOTE 0 -21'$- -£21'5-
~mlDO!!QIIJSEFIDcaruT,ORDEGREE 1JL_ El!ISTJIG__Jl1 1 COlPUNGS.wMt£REONTHISJC8.CtUUSE ~ SllEQ'COQII~ EnF=SE~~~~ =~a @~~~P\NI) @ ■
®
@
0 PRN/rfftPI.I.JJ!())(PERffOTE
LlllEl."l'&Ol'(IJSEP SHOWN ~~,
PRNNIY~PERNOTE
LlllEl."'MH-Ol'{USEP- ~~,
PRN/rfftswrrt>IVM.U PERNOTE
IME"UJl"(USEllfSIDMi ~~,
CITY Of s.,,NTAaJAAEL.ECTRIC
[lEl'J.UKIERGIUlfO BIGfjEEllfiC
ST~lWll,--IUl!IER$.
= ®
@
-
■ 0 ■ 0 D ® Cl
®
D @ 11:11
0 Ill
~
FOR DETAl.SOFTHESEEW.l.OOl'INCITENUMEIERS SEETIEcalRESPCtONGPHlE~IN00.1000 """'"" U/E • IURKIMG OM UDS.
~ ELECTI«:SEIIYl:EEIII IW<CE8Y
DEVEI.OPER ll~MIHCITYOf-WITA
Q.NIAllUl.llNGJiSPECIJCtlOMIIONax>ES.

DEVELOPER'S WORK
INORD£Rroet:wsTFIUCrllQl11(SHCIWIONTli/SORA'MN1.,
l'Ot.l 1111ST HA~ A VAUO 8I.ILDiNG PGNJT AND STAAr
CONS7RUC11CWlt,/TII/NISUONTl/"SOFOAll"OF.<Pl'ROVAL
OFTII/SORA'MNC. ffJRANlXFFNS/ON OFrTWEPLCASC
CON1ACTS. V.P.AT(4,M)261-!i292.

DESIGNED BT": \IIZJON UTIUTY
APPRD',£0BY: MONROE STREET
930, 940, 950 MONROE ST 11..,. ,_ :a StlT 1 or ,

MONROE STREET
I o""~ ~,,o~o~o I ~==-~ 1:~ 1::- 1~~ 1•roo,Hraa...=ro~-~ @ ---~-= '" " '
T#
X
(> N:ttlJ.EAl,ILLEFQll..MV.Ll.liOI'
® ~-, .. ~~,=-~• •
~~~~-u~ e') UMCNUM CIII.JFORNCUM
~ ~ ·~"=•-· W~=::..~MCj
~z
E-<<i:: z ...J
..:i::i::i...
...J
p...

DESIGN
POBOX485
BEN WMOND, CA 95005
(831) 336-3100
FOCUS
REVISED, 06/16/2023

DESIGN BY, R)D

DRAWN BY, GEM/MO
SCALE: 1" .. 10'-0"
Ll.1 S
_L 2NO FLOOROlffilNE
----- --------
~-~-~ ::c
C I
---H---sD-f--so ~ I LJ f--'-'=~=--'--'-S
w
ffi T5
,- =-===~=~~====~,-,...,~~==+
I ms,~~,,G~oe,o I ~==:~ 1:~ 1::- 1~~ 1•roo,Hraa..=:ro~-~ ® ---~-= '" " '
T#
X
0 .-aJU.EA,..lLEFOUMV.L,._'
®--.. --~·.
~~=•=rn~ ~ UMCNIJMCAUFORNICUM
~ ---=••=•
w~ =::-~~~-~
Cj
~z
E-<<i:: z ...J
..:i::i::i...
...J
p...

DESIGN
POBOX485
BEN WMOND, CA 95005
(831) 336-3100
FOCUS
REVISED, 06/16/2023

DESIGN BY, R)D

DRAWN BY, GEM/MO
SCALE: 1" .. 10'-0"
Ll.2 S
LGlllllll6L

CITYOFUNTACLARA
-IIITNOTU
L Hllmldac~-,p.c~dlf'tr-.bldudma:roala,.llllliDba._wflhaul ___ ,_
......,..md4inlcc-.er'fiaioafnl:lllbtctt,-ubariltorartuineqloredbJ"cil;r a. No~rl-.JW'rl~SC-.~rO!M,tlilllb9dooe~dlnca
~~-~.....,af'aborimltme(JM)Olll1fftill .......

3. Whm.~-withinlhedriplineofedllinltr-,OOlllnCIOrlblllpiko diad111111tMllilla...,.lnalbttra. Wbn.dm•not~...---• ~WJ.iori·-rrtl!kdl:bf!llrtnmlm. 'J.'bml!!iDbtilppmmitmt1he!MOIMd a!6ioewhentltebaoldloeortnotwbllderdl91betreaa.

4. Jll,ftDn,-n~cpdcklrwltbtlllhnmaaf'----. .... _._wtddlt_ dri:PlineaFIIIDlliq~ Irt1Ma110t,maibleand.t11eWlllllhllr»bal.lb,orwtnd,, oonindmmmtbapmatmdaaaiat ... --..1-,widt.watladap. lftl» tanpna1untla80"'1'1r ~tolllllinllliJr.acomlaal.coalmoi81---. ....... thalmdap---~~-------- ICtlte~-.... lll".tmbadapmmti.~_,.mui-.-a-... _,._
mafntaln.aoonaantmnlmmalanadttkm.. s.dnxllamadly~..a.n.boro.16 :miJlutea.L:aqler1'00UOlllaaimbia•bl:uotleallddtr-.flmnllle--- .........

5. Wbm.n111111:rw~an:n,qaind1ol&nt,,llhimib:Jbd_.1lM=J111MIDl pnimtm_.witla_bllllatQ--appmndpnmiqlld.Roamd.an~
brobalbollldllelftlledtwobrdalnlllllbt ...... nd. on.lledtrlmaRlnl --Hl:d710111low....,.10bcam,8b.p),t:a\ffl!M~•O..af'---
Wllbctl»bWto-a-1taUD117.
a. Ccmtndm'IIIIIID.notifJ"tlteait;F----...-mmriltada,m. ... Talmania .._or....,.wml:NQDirq~muundarwitmD.tbamiplimiaf'aimae~

7. Alilmr~af'fllilliqllllalbepzuri!Wmuuad.-a-.witlu.30'oftltepnu,med. tradmll.Cmdnctarllllll __ .,,.,,,,.af'am,.._,&amlbacN,-..W..- arlataemplofedbfd1J.

8. f&amaallaatl»Jl)aoedwld:dall»driflbaf'adlalilll~
~ ..................... ,.._... ..... ~
1'1Flaf'4
~ ~~~--
l. ~ =-=--::..'::.:..::. .. -·- ,...,... .............................. trw ~c.:-:,~r-;...~i.~
Tree ll'ell Detail

CITY OF UNTACLARA
ARBORl TNOTU

9. :haceallUWtobemalned.10CODIJllecelJenc1oletilaqpPil'll!!ikl!RMlll'larlD dnditicm.srabbiicarpaiiq. l'elluial:lliudlbeplaoidatlhedripliDeaCemlml ir-ar,ff"pmdla.l.Ji~tllerdll&oltbadrlplmllouttn-tlae'lnlllkaf'tatne. .&~ailnlllilallbe~~ganc:ll._ Tbeqa'1111lt.a
mmi.-ot&hl.r...i.ci1-t:,-..~- 1lm.......,__da.re...
llllaD.-.,tti.taBtlftd.wldaaallQIPl'Mlll.6-dla-~-nllodar. :r-ma111»s-toot.taD.d:lablllnlr.tr
~•apJll'imdbiJ'lbt.-~armKJdll.taplPJwbfcttJ,hlm,1111,11 realiD'llllilllanllklland.~woil: OCIIIIIMIAlaaMticm,,lffllPlll ir-'lffdi..___..up_bltnt,-kt~_.tu,;,..__r..dail:
__.,__...ai:,aU~tn.-~-t.opl"flt8Cti..&-~ -------WME. 10.Notnnr:lltn.,llhallblldnmwlthln.thlldrtplfnad"Bl.tnc~wtlkmt.tM~ aNw:ai:t,IIWialorarboriat~ti,,cil;J. Open.t:renclliqiD.tllemat-ara Jlllh1ietna•,rmillitad.a111tia-•--tlaetnamull"fall11Cllltaladiadriil .__.,._ma~ ~11111Jba.:ur-tl(tathlloplnb:larlhltdtf'
_....arlltlomlen-,,edti,.cq,tllem!PICtoCtrenchiailoalheueewilk 1L -.4.drCllltiieolemtilllll'OOllaf'mQ~llballbedaaewidlanrow,dli&bl"eQlliJlmmt .... • .._. ......... ciltmd;rmbm:iaarnbmidampk,JadbJcitJ.Mq fttUDIGl'..-...rwlldJllffiNUWllltllllbedou-.tuaappn,M~
..... lbs .... _...af'_IM.w:rdadaborf!IL
ll.~lboald-a...,.....)l'Dbl-.ftra-b.,~mto
dn-.armmtina:aalim.-

18. .&1...-.dbanlhld$!maf'dqtr..nllbedonewtthapprmredlf&bt ~---lmcirm~af'tbeait;,arbamtarubmul.mipu:,ed.ti,,
Q. Allhdincwidu.tbacrip1-af'J)fflalatia.liballbedanewilb.apprvred ...-..,1D11r1111~~af'al&\Olrtmldarbodlt.'11-odllml
l'D.tlb1-scl'aillial~IIIDlllauebelllalli&d. D'asradl:~ill _,._.,, .... ~-~

14.Wblm.~il.ai-.i.,&Jie.-.-i:m-.4nlc,a1,_.wtlb•..,_-ll)(lt. ~Jd(rtD~IDnmdlzllld.aaromJlqaf'ioat&
JS. n-llila-ddmaimd111le-.ti,,lma!l;Jubarutarnmt.~ ..
•a»maa..a.-~dartacammrumionlllwlbaNJllamdbJO.

Pqc2ol4
Tree Detail Planter Strip

CITYOFUNTACLARA
-IIITNOTU
~'ftada'ldiodlcaraztlo!taflllllllOJ8di.•llllhlll....._lba ~.-.---quatil;p,.-.1...-,iol.

11.Placar-fl'diick-1cb.aroudlllllllDlliq:tte.(Ollt.totheirdrip~lhl&-IO .. :rminlllJa"iarlDa:,Clllmtnl!lim. TlmwiDhelplDElrWlll.moubreandmilelnle wttllfntMt.da(-

17.Baftpibi-..c.oi..ed.witbintbedriplmeof....,.tree.

D.lllllllJl!i
Whefftltere»i...meientQ1aOe:Wb,paalhedriplineti,.1:l'trDl:iul~toll .mtictnala-llfli"'DBB,11»ta.talldfma111a1tt.lllDbrlNnic. n. ~-~~ar'lbabareftoaatutlrJ!l,IJbl,r,mtnm,dlrad:btk determinedb,-W&mt'teraflhetfteMapeai&dbJdle~tahle::
10-14 ..
.. ... ---
1---
15-18 ...... -u9UIIIDWor1-
l.O-lf. udaa
aoiaabmarnwe
,._,. - m TIPFI PIIQTBCTIQlf
Tnalmlllwill•nulaNdbJ'bomt:at ddilalat..mdlalaamfrm:11. dul:lllmrl. dletzwia ..... dirmiml:
. ·--.,
·-... ,._ .....
.....
....... SJ;-
..... L CoalnoiorlballUSud.ideatfff'edlcill~wbioh-tomadawillliotbe lllQia!lllabllRidaa.lhtiKlhlle.~-WIGP!Wtrimn.lll'Wlft Pnltal!la;.tq-1 tza.1111:•ttr..from~IJ:r'lhllwmlt. 'l'nllllmmtrld. ........... tD ...... tftlellbll'Mpedonned.bJ'u.lSAoertiliedabcrill.orotllerperwmel......,,,_'7 dlld;Jabmtrtararbariat~b,-ctt,-.Jfa._.tiw•.--llr
A
_J
CITYOFUNTACI.ARA

ARBORIIITNOTU
~ortlllld•al9mkohllewarl;.ommacwir...U-llla~lnclaclBI'
itaroi"-,fnn.lhelile&n=plmeeuiJa--S.1newith .......... tnle. lf mcb.npl-.tilllllt.,a.lbll,_tlll,cndlamir .... .....__t.otbatreaawmrtba ~linedintheWllebelow. Tbecit,rubomlartrliarill_..,..,..,lball betbeade~ufdaeoooditioaaf'a:,-tree.CmlnDlaraWl,.,,.._npbr --rtncolllllilthlf~wtdliatba~-... u.
a . -- CmdnicCa'1111aD,.u.tne-•w1iaarldldlll'ti..11t~tMtdlalir .,.....,a___.o111leCO!ltlMtOl"a:IMl.~10:,rorideueoute~llla ~n.PQmaataamtllhallbain_....wilb.tha~
..._..~mlne,i,..ealtplll'"mnbad.lllllllllbllllltnthllml.t__.laaaaf' lbe~b~oftreMandOlberplan1a",,re:pared.lt,tbDDCill
af'tnellllll_....an:hitecta.
' - ..... . ..... ...... . ..... ..... 10 - . .... 11 ..... ..... .. ..... . , .... ,. - ..... .. - ..... 11 ..... &lDJ)DO ,. - ....... " - ... 000 181JrrclMmand-.
......... .... • ·-
DESIGN
POBOX485
BEN WMOND, CA 95005
(831) 336-3100
FOCUS
REVISED, 06/16/2023

DESIGN BY, R)D
DRAWN BY: GEM,MO

SCALE,NTS
Ll.3
Appadr:H -JREE PR01EQ]ONGUIDELINES~
Prot8ctlng Tr91sDurtrw0Jnstructlon:
1Ja.bll,.~or•wm11.....,_.ar ...... _h,.._....., ClllllllndCII\Cll'-wa11:DSI .... _,.._ ... ,_.. ..... _.., ....,_ al•Olllwmlb~pa9.IIUlfl.._ ... _.~b
.... ft:lr ....... rt ...... ~ ............. .........
2J ., .. flap:llld~--....lny---. .. ---. ...... .. pdldbl-,9P9a111-............ ~.., .. pi$1:t ...._ID .._,_lualllD__,-,....._ ..... ,_........_ J} lhlllg:gnlhlldqnlliMillhll!iliP'&.lilDtilllilliati"GAll !wl&il ~-11'-----~minctlall.i..l ____ ............. .. ....... ol' .. prqaclllbarlllffllf'i.....-n..ta ... beCIINllldlaldlD _..._.,1111111.pm1111a.~wmrrua....itieccn11111m
• •--DftllltlllV4> C-..ar..._..-V._.11111:ba.--i_.,_ .... _._ -....--................. ,-mlllldbr .. P-..:t
0) -,.,_"1lgltD:;ln .... llllllXGl' ..... Dll.._._d_....-., ...... ...,..__.""•~--w•~----•....-.. ¥W' •---l'DCll:ml. IQ ~cl,.mlwiltlltwhapmmdirlnm.,...lltaadad. 7J M1-----.~. orfilqjcl,....-.gi,uiadu1-..,_,,_
-~---baneanllldand--lDIUl:ftcurwan• .. piqld
.-.- -....~----•dllllllldoelld.andGCIIIIINlml ., .......... 111".iCft~- I) eu.igo,1aaol' ........ wltl111cp111 .... _.ar .... btNPftllBdal -INllia-.ldad.Allll'lall,a.11,llldalwdltnlNllia~i'I• _......._,._.....,ID .. ha. 9) Oi,,1111,ct.11i1:1111,..,1:91111C,.~oralhlr"..,..__hC_,.be._....1o _._.IIOlbe...aor-... ..... 0. ... ...--,-r:1-,piolllimd 1Ns, or•111Jat..lacilllmlanO.•flam-.ldlu:h ....... .....,.._.._ -~--of•pnainci ....
10)CllnR'uc&lnmlllellllllNllllllbealaed~tllehepidl!dianmnerla --
~Ma'lstCIUtlesandln_speclionSchedule:
'lhlpiqld:IIIDlll:lllbpanon(a)MIPQlllllll,far_,_ O...._.INI.__., -..atftlllhellll,a'UCIUellldrilk...,...re,a,t~.~wilh
........ -------~--pn:,lldic:a---lllDlialllg, pnv.- ,aportlad&lllnpaclan.

A..-.ipqec:1.11t1c11111(or&m)nudbedllipadllld...-i1D..._and Ir.---~~...,.,.,.., ...... ,.,... ............... lrMPQllrlWPnrRIIMl'Wtant"WWm-• Wmt.......,_ ll!!li!l!iail fO!!l'3d5l'I MdfflllllfflOIIMtTIIIJl!fqKtalle!MWll!lll('fllfl "'llfWII ~ . .......... _,,_._, ..,... .._._ ,..s-.-ar,..~IDIIMN'ne....-.i-. .... .,...._.. __ ~....,...., ...... -Rlllllllllld......,._llmaga...,,_..,IMadlMIO fa'dla,Gf._lftlpl'Ol,idl _,, __
JrWFF1RDli'«JM111CllilYl9IJmlfflt'.,,..,.S!M411tca:1Mpea• .... lllfadliJ"..,..lleTreeFl'DlmalZlllll!Sorpmll'Wlllnsrdlllf __.....~,.,_..,.r.mvia.it11tl'lllltlor~---
-
~or•~-....r1-..... npei:ttr ._,_ ........ ...,.~~. kl.-ti:c..ahllbett.PnildArboriltfartilplqld.AllldlecUedi'llpediolia ... ..._a brllfT-~Npmt,.~iniwlillaandpn,riiadlD .. 0.,
-
TreePn:actlanfendn&
Tl88Pr111Ktianfelu,glNlb8nllllalprior1Df1118'1iw81fl~ ....... or ~ Fencelllllbecan.-llledr61111r:-lxltchslbfencl!ll'IDlllll!donelgl1-lbal: ... 1 R7JB.nti_........_.imd..-,cnvBD24n:i..mllhalPlllldft..-.iana ~of10.l:lal....._ Oncellllalllltm_hlfencllnut111111111ninllbblldrdlle ffUllln!d ...... lleCOIIR'UCliDnp!ocellinil&lll impecliDn. 11,bnpoclcrlti,hClyffbldll•lllllentdllWpiqjlct ... llerapll(ISIQIDnmlMII lny .. pnadli:II,___ TraPrda:tianSips
M..:liorar11m;qDILl1di....ty..-lw:lwill-V-~lhllll: .. _wllwl ......... T ... PmlacmnZDl.-andhllld.....,._ilpn:HJbd.. -,,,,, ...... ~ardand9:lnhllll..--cilD-....« ........,_llmluall tf'IIMde. ...._._ t,Jllep,qcllllDllll« a..-.ilMOWlllldMNnllllldnudbe -
n.e•ahludtie...-dbylhlpqld:arbc:dltora ... lllCIISA.Cartll9dArborlll:.,_ ,__ airadan-~aidany,-y-lmlldlllWDrktt.:raedllDbes-bmmnud _......,
R1D11puq1t1111:1e~--paqllCl:llbarllt.Wlwllllm_..,..,.. .. _. .. __....1118yalllulbepn..:l-llllldwllllappln,lwllluw. ~ -.•dlll'l-,_e.nlllll:CIUllmarDII.RoallDILl1dbelUlll¥X!IIUU'lllaar CIIMlll'IIOl:IIIWllflpdanllndball,1IIMlld..,-lhlr,qldnadlt.WIIIIIClll'llplllld. ~iaa....i•111p11n1111:wlhtuapor_,...wllwl_lalr.

Tn!I! Worll:Standanlsand Q.ialllbl:lm.

M._-t.__..,snmqj...-..... mpdnna:1-iai'llkmf ..... GI .......... 11111m1:11...inu.e..i: .......... Fmdimaor .. .......... 8ecillir'fl~(ISA)..ithllAmsanNd:111118'lndlrdl .......... Srillitr ,.._.11Adlm1Clan~MSIZ133--Z>17, Qnrau-~Q--...,ac:uw919g11..,..lb9-.illd.
~--~-.-...._-dlll8T-~~-,r1Nd1Dle
'antllalY~ticcqaairano.ta1 a11111U11..ailldtmn.Marlimsall:l'I~ ~----■1Dbe ........

T-»•-----•o.i1i11D......---a--pilli.om- -111:will .. ~JAlllma,-.1__.,....._ ... rmtlD...,...anya.nxntqjtia.or ......-. n..n. ... be GIII IDMl•di-.tDW--•i--tN•T ... IWnlNlllll~tDbe ~tir•QLiallldadlCD'...,_..OW.._,_, ..... ix.-ando...i Llltayad~~ --
DESIGN
POBOX485
BEN WMOND, CA 95005
(831) 336-3100
FOCUS
REVISED, 06/16/2023

DESIGN BY, R)D
DRAWN BY: GEM,MO

SCALE, NTS
Ll.4
Ground All
Neigbours property floor
Parking and Ramp West Floor
Private Patio walkway floor
Sidewalk floor
Walkalong Homestead floor
Walkalong Monroe Floor
Walkway along Franklin
4th Floor Terrace floor
>-
+
+ 0.8 fc 20.3 fc o.o fc N/ A N/ A
+ o.o fc 0.0 fc 0.0 fc N/ A N/A
+ 3.1 fc 19.6 fc 0.3 fc 65.3:1 10.3: 1
+ 3.1 fc 6.5 fc 0.4 fc 16.3 :1 7.8 :1
+ 3.4 fc 6.5 fc 0.4 fc 16.3 :1 8 .5 :1
+ 1.5 fc 4 .8 fc 0.1 fc 48.0 :1 15.0 :1
+ 3.5 fc 18.3 fc 0. 1 fc 183.0: 1 35.0:1
+ 3.6 fc 7.0 fc 0.3 fc 23.3:1 12.0:1
+ 2.3 fc 10.4 fc 0.1 fc 104.0 :1 23.0:1
---------------------------------------------------·-----------------------------------------------------, 'oo •u •u •oo •u •u •oo •u •u •oo •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •oo •4 :: : : :: : : :: : : :: : : : :: : : :: : : :: : : :: : : :: .~, •oo •u •u •oo •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u .J •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •u •oo oj =~=
' o..o .... ·o..o ,,
·u ·u ·oo ·~
- '
' L __ _
Schedule
Symbol L;ib91 Qu ntity nufilc:tuNl!r cat log Numto.r Ducnption Ump '1.':.:~:• f'1len ■ L::::s M':.t~p~~er tt 11• ui:!:t':r" A
B
D Bl
C
0 D
17 Lithonia
Lighting
Lithonia
Lighting
Lithonia
Lighting
Llthonl.i
Lighting
WDGEZ LED PJ WDGE2 LED WITH PJ -
30K SOCRI VF • PERFORMANCE
PACKAGE, 30001(,
80CRI, VISUAL

COMFORT FORWARD
OPTIC
WOGE2 LEO P2 WDGE2 LED WITH P2 •
JOK 80CRI VW - PERFORMANCE
PACKAGE, J000K,
80CRI, VISUAL

COMFORT WIDE
OPTIC
WDGE2 LEO Pl WOGE2 LEO WITH Pl -
JOK 80CRI VW - PERFORMANCE

PACKAGE, JOOOK,
80CRl, VISUAL

COMFORT WIDE
OPTIC
WDGE2 LEO P2 WOGE2 LED WITH P2 -
30K 80CRl VF - PERFORMANCE
PACKAGE, 3000K,
80CRJ, VISUAL

COMFORT FORWARD
OPTIC
BullettoLARGE BLTRPFEL2WF30
WFl3000KRa84
LED-WW10.4W_-
Targett! Stepllght 2EOGE PRO DEEP 13W L.ED-WW- 13W_-
0 "-
E
F
G
Goth.im
Architectural
Lighting
ZEP10FWDPFEL3JO JKFE
EV04SH 30/15 OFF EVO 41N SHOWER, 80
SMO CRl,JOOOK, lSOOLM,

FLUSH CLEAR
MB B 4140 16 L2 MR.Bo Boll.ird, 40" L.ED-NW-17W_-
40 (llnlsh) Version 160 17W40K
lOO_lxLEO-NW- 180FE
17W_-
Ceiling Height: Various, per Client's Architectural Drawings Lumlnalre Mounting Height: As Noted In Plan Drawing
Reflectances: 30% for All Exterior Objects
Calculation Point Height: Indicated In "Statistics"
WDGE2_L.ED_P 3015
3_301(_80CRI_
Vf.ies
WOGE2_L.ED_P 1997
~ -~~80CRI_
WOGE2_l.EO_P 1241
1_30K_80CRI_
VW.ies
WOGE2_LEO_P 1947 0.85
2__30K_80CRI__
VF.les
BLTRPFEL2WF3 1148 0.85

0.ies
ZEPlOFWOPFEL 2088
J JO.les
EV04SH_30_15 1281
_DFF_SMO.les
MB641_18L24 2806
OFE.les
Luminaire illuminance values provided in this report, whether for nomial, critical, or emergency applications, are for product application assistance only. These values were developed In collaboration with, and are subject to approval by, the design professional of record (architect/engineer/ LC), and are NOT Intended for construction. Because these values are approximate and based on limited application information provided to 16500, Inc. at the time of calculation, 16500, Inc. does not warrant the Installed performance of the lumlnalre(s) will match that shown in this report. Please verify all data and conditions to assure the accuracy of the report. 16500 shall neither be responsible nor liable for design, approval, or results of emergency lighting under any circumstances. / ! e:'!1-.. . 1, ·,., -... - · ., .. ':u ""••-- ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - e .. r .. / / , : ,,. r .. r ... .., ... . . .. ~,;"~., •.,- •., •,.• ~.,:;1••., -,; •,. •., ..£ •,u •., / i " u r .,, .,. ... . ·u ·,., .,. ~""':. • .. •.,I •,. •., •u •u •,. •u ·., ·,, ·,. ·,. ·,. ·, ., ·u ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :1 ~
' u ~ r r "~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
=-:·-:=--{-
-... ....

IT
[
-, .. , -,,
j
T
I j
LJ
1 •=
Statistics
Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min
--Ell!Hl!ID-IIEL'IIIIEPLIIII N/A N/A
Neigbours property floor 0.0 fc 0.0 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A /',.

Parking and Ramp West Floor 3.1 fc 19.6 fc 0.3 fc 65.3:1 10.3:1 D Private Patio walkway floor 3.1 fc 6.5 fc 0.4 fc 16.3:1 7.8:1 Sidewalk floor 3.4 fc 6.5 fc 0.4 fc 16.3:1 8.5:1 D Walkalong Homestead floor l.5fc 4.8 fc 0.1 fc 48.0:1 15.0: 1 Walkalong Monroe Floor 3.5 fc 18.3 fc 0.1 fc 183.0:1 35.0: 1 /',.

Walkway along Franklin 3.6 fc 7.0 fc 0.3 fc 23.3:1 12.0: 1 4th Floor Terrace floor 2.3 fc 10.4 fc 0.1 fc 104.0:1 23.0: 1 0 0 0
D
A
□
sixteen 5 hundred 0
A
B
Bl
C
D
D
D
E
E
F
G
T
' 0.1 ' 0.1 •u ' 0.1 • 11 ' 11
·,., -.. -.. -,, -., .J.
•,., "u •., :w,. :,•,• '.\.j ' 0.1 ' u ••• ~ -
' 0.1 ' u •u ' 1.1 •2. 1 ' 2.1 ' 2.
' 0.1 ' o., •u ' 1.2 •:u 'u
' 0.1 'o.z •,_. ' u '•.2 ' o1.
' 0.1 ' 0.2 . ... ' 2.0 ·u ' ,.o {·o· ' 0.1 •.., •u 'z.o •u 'u • 1 : • " •,_, "u • ., •,. •., ••• :-1
'o.1 ' u •u ' 2.0 ' u 'u <01
'0.1 ' 0.2 •u ' u •u 'u •1 1" • "
' 0.1 •.., •,_. ':u 'u
[ -.. -., -.. -.. -.. -..
17 uthonla Ughtlng ::-~~LED Pl J0K
6 uthonlaUghtlng =-~~DP2J0K
7 uthonla Ughtlng =-~~D Pl 30K
0 uthonlaUghtlng=~LEDP230K
=
BullettolARGEFL20
degree3000KRa8412W
J Gothilm
Ardille<1U'111
Ughting
BUll<!llOLARGEMFLJO
oegree3000KRa8412W
3474302J_V03
HB B4 14018l240 (ftnlsh) I00_1xl£D-NW17W_-
4K
WDGE2LEDWITHPJPER.FOR.MANCE PACKAGE, JOOOK, =• VISUAL COMFORT FORWARD WDGE2LEDWITHP2-
PER.FORMANCE PACKAGE, JOOOK,
=,VISUALCOMFORTWIOE
WDGE2LEDWITHP1 -
PER.FORMANCE PACKAGE, JOOOK.
=,VISUALCOMFORTWIOE
WDGE2LEDWITHP2-
PER.FORMANCE PACKAGE, JOOOK.
~' VISUAL COMFORT FORWARD
Li{lhtmari< Bollan:l luminaire
EV041NSHOWER,80CRI,JOOOK,
lSOOLH,FWSH CLEAR
U'O-
=10.4W_ -
=- 10.4W_
U'O-
--

10.4W_
U'O-
--IJW_-
:i~~e~wn:l, 40"Verslon16017W :::.-
17W_-
COfrCXlll:N,U
ONE BEDROOM 3
'WOI! "i.tOOM 7
...
4D ..

Celling Height: Varies
Luminaire Mounting Height: As noted
Calculation Point Height: As noted
Luminaire lllumlnance values provided In this report, whether for nom,al, crltical, or emergency appllcatlons, are for product application assistance only. These values were developed in collaboration with, and are subject to approval by, the design professional of record (architect/engineer/LC), and are NOT Intended for construction.

Because these values are approximate and based on limited application infom,ation provided to 16500, Inc. at the time of calculation, 16500, Inc. does not warrant the Installed performance of the lumlnalre(s) will match that shown in this report. Please verify all data and conditions to assure the accuracy of the report. 16500 shall neither be responsible nor liable for design, approval, or results of emergency lighting under any circumstance.
------ ... -------·
J 4(l
C
0 ..

I!
0 t:I.
...
0 u
..

C
.!!
0 V
\

N/A N/A /'-
Neigbours property floor 0.0 fc 0.0 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A □ Parking and Ramp West Floor 3.1 fc 19.6 fc 0.3 fc 65.3:1 10.3:1 Private Patio walkway floor 3.1 fc 6.5 fc 0.4 fc 16.3:1 7.8:1 D Sidewalk floor 3.4 fc 6.5 fc 0.4 fc 16.3:1 8.5:1 Walkalong Homestead floor l.5fc 4.8 fc 0.1 fc 48.0:1 15.0: 1 Walkalong Monroe Floor 3.5 fc 18.3 fc 0.1 fc 183.0:1 35.0: 1 Walkway along Franklin 3.6 fc 7.0 fc 0.3 fc 23.3:1 12.0: 1 4th Floor Terrace floor 2.3 fc 10.4 fc 0.1 fc 104.0:1 23.0: 1 0 0 D
A
□
sixteen 5 hundred 0
A
B
Bl
C
D
D
D
G
l . ., ·,., . .. , ·0.1
•o.o •o., •11.1
17 LlthonlaUghtln,g~E2V~P330K
6 LlthonlaUghtlng ~E2J;!=DP2301C
7 UthonlaUghtlng :i~E2J;!=DP1301C
O UthonlaUghtlng~E2v~OP230K
3 Gotham
An:hlteetural
UghUng
BullettolARGEFL20
degrN30001CRi18412W
BullettolARGEMFL30
degree30001C Ril84!2W
BullettolARGEWFL
30001(~4
MBB 414018L240
(tlnlsh)IOO_hlEO-NW17W_-
•c

CONOOMNIUM
ON S:..OllROOM 3
WOREDROOM 6
WOGE2LEDWllliP3-
PERF0RMANCEPACKAGE,JOOOK,
~~~' VISUAL COMFORT FORWARO
WOGE2LEDWllliP2-
PERF0RMANCEPACKAGE, 3000K,
~~~' VISUAL COMFORT WIOE
WOGE2LEDWllliPIPERF0RMANCEPACKAGE, 3000K,
~~~' VISUAL COMFORT WIOE
WOGE2LEDWITHP2-
PERFORMANCEPACKAGE, 3000K,
~~' VISUAL COMFORT FORWARD
Ughtm,rkBoll•rdlumlnel"'
EV041NSHOWER,80CRI, 3000K,
lSOOlM,FLUSliCLEAR
LEOWW•

10.4W_
LEOWW·

10.4W_
LEOWW·
13W_-
LEOWW·
13W_-
~:k8:'8~Jrd, 40" Version 160 17W ~:
17W_-
------ ... -----~-·
Ceiling Height: Varies
Luminaire Mounting Height: As noted
calculation Point Height: As noted
Luminaire lllumlnance values provided In this report,
whether for nom,al, critical, or emergency appllcatlons, are for product application assistance only. These values were developed in collaboration with, and are subject to approval by, the design professlonal of record
(architect/engineer/LC), and are NOT intended for
construction. Because these values are approximate and
based on limited application information provided to 16500, Inc. at the time of calculation, 16500, Inc. does not warrant the installed performance of the luminaire(s) will match that shown in this report. Please verify all data and conditions to assure the accuracy of the report. 16500 shall neither be responsible nor liable for design, approval, or results of emergency lighting under any circumstance.

C
0 ..

I!
0 t:I.
...
0 u
..

C
.!!
0 GENERAL NOTES.

1. /,NY DESIGNS OR SOLlJTIONS SHOWN IN DRAWING, EITHER DIRECT OR IMPLIED,

ARE HEREBY CLARIFIED AS EXAMPLES ANO SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE DESIGNS FOR CONSTRUCTION. TI-IESE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED TO SUPPLEMENT TI-IE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FROM ARCHITECT.
2 /,NY PARTIAL INFORMATION, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURATE DESCRIPTIONS OF

WORK SHOWN IN DRAWINGS, WHICH ARE NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE SCOPE OF WORK, SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLETION OF WORK.

ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED TO SATISFY THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AAO CONDITIONS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ARCHITECT SHAU. BE PROMPTLY NOTIFIED OF /,NY INCONSISTENCIES /,ND/OR DISCREP/>,NCIES.

PLAN CHECK NOTES.

1. MANAGEMENT STAFF SHALL PROVIDE DESIGNATED RECYQ.ING RECEPTACLE IN

MAIL ROOM FOR RESIDENTIAL DISPOSAL OF UNWANTED MAIL, AS WELL AS A

DESIGNATED WASTE RECEPTACLE FOR BATTERIES, PAINT, FLUORESCENT BULBS, OR ANY OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIAL BANNED FROM LANDFIU. THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL HANDLING.

2. MANAGEMENT STAFF SHALL PROVIDE SIGNAGE IN ALL TRASH VESTIBULES THAT EXPLICITLY DETAILS PROPER DISPOSAL OF WASTE, RECYCLING, ANO COMPOST.

RESIDENTIAL TRASH ROOM
SEE SHEETTR1.0

RETAIL TRASH ROOM
SEESHEETTR1.0
I
4151 ■

AMERICAN

TRASH MANAGEMENT

AMERICAN TRASH MANAGEMENT
1900 POWELL STREET, SUITE 890
EMERYVIUE, CALIFORNIA 94608
P: 415.292.5400
F:415.292. 54 10
[email protected]

SALVATORE CARUSO

LAMB PARTNERS

MONROE STREET
11/05/21
1/32"z l '-O"

SITE PLAN
LEVEL 1
TR0.1
Ill
Ill
Ill I
GEHERAl NOTES.

1. ANY DESIGNS OR SOLUTIONS SHOWN IN DRAWING, EITHER DIRECT OR IMPLIED.

ARE HEREBY CLARIFIED AS EXAMPLES AND SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE DESIGNS FOR CONSTRUCTION. THESE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED TO SUPPLEMENT THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FROM ARCHITECT.

2. AAY PARTIAL INFORMATION, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURATE DESCRIPTIONS OF WORK SHOWN IN DRAWINGS. WHICH ARE NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE SCOPE OF WORK, SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLETION OF WORK.

ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED TO SATISFY THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE PROMPTLY NOTIFIED OF ANY INCONSISTENCIES AND/OR DISCREPANCIES.

PLAN CHECK NOTES.

1. MANAGEMENT STAFF SHALL PROVIDE DESIGNATED RECYCLING RECEPTACLE IN MAIL ROOM FOR RESIDENTIAL DISPOSAL OF UNWANTED MAIL, AS WEU. AS A

DESIGNATED WASTE RECEPTACLE FOR BATTERIES, PAINT, FLUORESCENT BULBS,

OR ANY OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIAL BANNED FROM LANDFILL THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL HANDLING.

2. MANAGEMENT STAFF SHALL PROVIDE SIGNAGE IN ALL TRASH VESTIBULES THAT EXPLICITLY DETAILS PROPER DISPOSAL OF WASTE, RECYCLING, AND COMPOST.

CHUTE INTAKE VESTIBULE
SEESHEETTR1.0
4151 ■

AMERICAN

TRASH MANAGEMENT

AMERICAN TRASH MANAGEMENT
1900 POWELL STREET, SUITE B90
EMERYVILLE, CALIFORNIA 94608
P: 415.292.5400
F:41S.292.5410
[email protected]

SALVATORE CARUSO

LAMB PARTNERS

MONROE STREET
1rn1 1111111-=========!
11/05/21
1/32"z l '-O"

SITE PLAN
LEVEL 2
TR0.2
[]
GENERAL NOTES.
1 ANY DESIGNS OR SOLUTIONS SHOWN IN DRAWING, EITHER DIRECT OR IMPLIED,

ARE HEREBY CLARIFIED AS EXAMPLES ANO SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE DESIGNS FOR CONSTRUCTION. THESE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED TO SUPPLEMENT THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FROM ARCHITECT.

2. ANY PARTIAL INFORMATION, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURATE DESCRIPTIONS OF

WORK SHOWN IN DRAWINGS, WHICH ARE NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE SCOPE OF WORK, SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLETION OF WORK.

ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED TO SATISFY THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT APPLICABLE BUILDING COOES.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY All DIMENSIONS ANO CONDITIONS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE PROMPTLY NOTIFIED OF ANY INCONSISTENCIES ANO/OR DISCREPANCIES.

PLAH CHECK NOTES.
1 MANAGEMENT STAFF SHALL PROVIDE DESIGNATED RECYCLING RECEPTACLE IN MAIL ROOM FOR RESIDENTIAi. DISPOSAL OF UNWANTED MAIL AS WELL AS A

DESIGNATED WASTE RECEPTACLE FOR BATTERIES, PAINT, FLUORESCENT BULBS,

OR ANY OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIAL BANNED FROM LANDFILL THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL HANDLING.
2 MANAGEMENT STAFF SHALL PROVIDE SIGNAGE IN AU. TRASH VESTIBULES THAT EXPLIClnY DETAILS PROPER DISPOSAL OF WASTE, RECYCLING, AND COMPOST.

LEGEND:

STAFF PATH OF TRAVEL FROM TRASH ROOMS
TO TRASH STAGING AREA.

PROJEC'l'E[n~ASI-I COLLECTION SCHEDULE/

RESIDENTIAL
RECYQJNG-3CY
--= J
6 I
PROJECTED TRASH _E.~-=~~C:,N SCHEDULE / WK
RECYQJNG-2CY
"'""' COMPOST-116G
= I
7 I
I
I
I
,- I
r1m1 I ;
_ ~li!!HI
L-----------------~~~
<l4
<l
7 -~
,',
,'
-✓
~ Jm~
11111
4151
■

AMERICAN

TRASH MANAGEMENT

AMERICAN TRASH MANAGEMENT
1900 POWELL STREET, SUITE 890
EMERYVIUE, CALIFORNIA 94608
P: 415.292.5400
f:415.292.5410
[email protected]

SALVATORE CARUSO

LAMB PARTNERS

MONROE STREET

STAGING DETAILS

RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL
SB TR0.3 11/05/21
1/32"=1 '-0"
...,..._Tl<'<.,.,.l'I TOTM. AT .... ru:ia,IUl'PORl" FR,WE

CHUTE VESTIBULE
TYPICAL AT LEVEL 2--6
OESIGNISSUE#3 l
+ -----------------"'"-''-"''¾'--"-------------_l_,t

RESIDENTIAL TRASH COLLECTION ROOM
LEVEL 1
SHEET NOTES.

RESIDENTIAL TRASH ROOM - LEVEL 1:

1. TRASH COLLECTION ROOM IS PART OF 2HR FIRE-RATED
TRASH CHUTE SHAFT - RESTRICTED ACCESS.

2. FLOOR SHALL BE FINISHED WITH WATERPROOF DECK
COATING. FLOOR TO HAVE MINIMAL SLOPE (1° MAX) ANO
FLOOR DRAIN. FLOOR LEVEL UNDER COMPACTOR.

3. WALLS SHALL BE FINISHED WITH WASHABLE WATERPROOF

SURFACE SUCH AS FRP OR HIGH-GLOSS ENAMEL PAINT,
8'-0"AFF.

4. INSTALL WALL PROTECTION: 11-1/4•Hx6ftW CONCRETE CURB AT BASE OF ALL NON-CONCRETE WALLS. DO NOT INSTALL
THE CURB AROUND THE COMPACTOR OR POWER PACKS.

5. 8'-0" WIDE ROLL-UP DOOR, ANO 3·-0• WIDE NFPA COMPLIANT FIRE EGRESS DOOR.

6. ROOM SHALL BE MECHANICALLY VENTILATED WITH (1)
CFM/FT PER 2019 CBC.

7. (1) 30•0 #304 S.S. GRAVITY CHUTE WITH COMPACTOR FOR
WASTE. PROVIDE CUSTOM 3CY Fl NARROW COMPACTOR
CONTAINERS FOR WASTE.

8. (1) 30•0 GALVANNEAL STEEL GRAVITY CHUTE WITH
COMPACTOR FOR RECYCLING. PROVIDE 3CY FL NARROW
COMPACTOR CONTAINER FOR RECYCLING.

9. CHUTES SHALL TERMINATE AT 5•.9• AFF.

10. THRU-WALL INTAKE FOR RESIDENTIAL TRASH AT LEVEL 1.

PROVIDE (2) 18x18 SIDE HINGED, ELECTRICALLY
INTERLOCKED, AUTOMATIC OPENING DOORS. SEE DETAIL
1/TR.2.0.
11 . PP: COMPACTOR POWER PACKS SHALL BE
FLOOR-MOUNTED. (1 I SHP 3-PHASE, 20812301460V. 30A
DISCONNECT so· AFF.

12. MCP: CHUTE MASTER CONTROL PANEL SHALL BE
WALL-MOUNTED so· AFF. MUST ALLOW LOCK DOWN OF

CHUTE INTAKES FOR EXCHANGING CONTAINERS ANO
WASHING CHUTES. REQUIRES 120V 15A DEDICATED
SERVICE.

13. AC: 2HP CHUTE AIR COMPRESSOR SHALL BE
WALL-MOUNTED so· AFF. REQUIRES 120V 15A SERVICE
OUTLETS.

14. OC: ODOR CONTROL UNIT SHALL BE WALL-MOUNTED so· AFF. REQUIRES 120V 15A SERVICE OUTLETS.

15. HB: HOT ANO COLD HOSE BIB SHALL BE WALL-MOUNTED so· AFF.

16. PROVIDE ELECTRIC PALLET TRUCK FOR TRANSFERRING
CONTAINERS. 4000Ib CAPACITY; TURNING RADIUS: 45.5".

REQUIRES 120V 1 SA SERVICE OUTLETS.

17. CHUTE DISCHARGE DOOR: TYPE-A, HORIZONTALLY
INSULATED SLIDING-STEEL DOOR, HELO OPEN BY 165° F
FUSIBLE LINK.

18. (1) UNDEDICATED 120V 15A SERVICE OUTLET REQUIRED
FOR STAFF MAINTENANCE PURPOSE.

CHUTE INTAKE VESTIBULES - LEVELS 2-6:

1. CHUTE INTAKE VESTIBULES SHALL BE 1HR FIRE-RATED WITH 1HR FIRE-RATED DOOR; s·-o· MIN REQUIRED PER ADA STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL ACCESS. PROVIDE (2) SELF CLOSING, 15x18 BOTTOM

HINGED, ELECTRICALLY INTERLOCKED, AUTOMATIC OPENING

INTAKE DOORS TO DISPOSE TRASH AND RECYCLING INTO
COMPACTORS PER CBC 713.13.1. POWER TO INTAKE DOORS
SUPPLIED BY MCP. SEE OETAIL 2/TR2.0. MANAGEMENT SHALL
PROVIDE 23-GALLON RUBBERMAID SLIM JIM CONTAINER AT EACH

VESTIBULE FOR COMPOST COLLECTION ANO DISPOSAL INTO
WASTE COMPACTOR.

2. CHUTE SHAFT SHALL NOT BE ERECTED UNTIL CHUTE HAS BEEN INSTALLED. FOR SOUND PROOFING PURPOSES, DOUBLE
STUD-WALLS ARE REQUIRED ADJACENT TO OCCUPIED SPACES.

INTERIOR OF SHAFT SHALL BE TAPED TO PREVENT ODOROUS AIR LEAKING INTO OCCUPIED SPACES.

3. PROVIDE ROUND FLOOR OPENINGS AT CONCRETE FLOORS AND
SQUARED FLOOR OPENINGS AT WOOD-FRAME CONSTRUCTION.

INSTALL FLOOR SUPPORT FRAME AT EACH FLOOR PENETRATION
TO SECURE CHUTE. SEE DETAIL 9"R.2.0 FOR ANCHORING ANO
MASON BRA-RED SOUND ISOLATION PAD ASSEMBLY. POUR RINGS

WILL VARY BASED ON THICKNESS OF FLOOR SLAB ANO SHALL BE PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. ANY DESIGNS OR DESIGN SOLUTIONS PRESENTED IN THIS

DRAWING OR SPECIFICATION, WHICH ARE DIRECT OR IMPLIED,

INCLUDING NARRATIVES, DRAWINGS, OR DIAGRAMS, ARE HEREBY

CLARIFIED AS EXAMPLES AND SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
COMPLETE DESIGNS OR DESIGNS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION.

2. OMISSIONS FROM DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS, OR THE

INACCURATE DESCRIPTION OF DETAILS OF WORK, WHICH ARE

MANIFESTLY NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT THE INTENT OF THE

DRAWINGS ANO SPECIFICATIONS, OR WHICH ARE CUSTOMARILY

PERFORMED, SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM

PERFORMING SUCH OMITTED OR INACCURATELY DESCRIBED
DETAILS OF THE WORK. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED AS IF FULLY

ANO CORRECTLY SET FORTH ANO DESCRIBED IN THE DRAWINGS
ANO SPECIFICATIONS.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND
CONDITIONS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE

ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEOIATEL Y OF ALL EXISTING

FIELD CONDITIONS AND ANY DISCREPANCIES OR
INCONSISTENCIES.

DESIGN ISSUES:

1. COMPACTORS MOVED IN ORDER TO MAKE BETTER USE OF TRASH ROOM AREA.

2. CHUTES MOVED TO MATCH NEW COMPACTOR LOCATION.

3. 8'-0" ROLL-UP DOOR AND 3'-0" EXIT DOOR RELOCATED.

4. THRU-WALL INTAKE DOORS ANO CARTS MOVED OVER PAGE
RIGHT.

PROJECTED TRASH COLLECTION SCHEDULE / WK

RESIDENTIAL
SERVICE M T w T F Sa Su
WASTE--3CY 1 COMPACTED
RECYCLING -- 3CY 1 COMPACTED
TOTAL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
4151
■

AMERICAN

TRASH MANAGEMENT

AMERICAN TRASH MANAGEMENT
1900 POWELL STREET, SUITE 890
EMERYVIUE, CALIFORNIA 94608
P: 4 15.292.5400
F: 415.292. 54 10
[email protected]

SALVATORE CARUSO

LAMB PARTNERS

MONROE STREET

RESIDENTIAL

TRASH ROOM PLAN
TR1.0 11/05/21
3/16".,l'-0"
4151
■
I I 10'-11?,§" I AMERICAN I SHEET NOTES: TRASH MANAGEMENT ,I-- - ELEC. PALLET COMMERCIAL TRASH ROOM
TRUCK SEE NOTE 14 1. FLOOR SHALL BE FINISHED WITH WATERPROOF DECK COATING. FLOOR TO HAVE AMERICAN TRASH MANAGEMENT 1900 POWELL STREET, SUITE 890
MINIMAL SLOPE (1" MAX) AND FLOOR DRAIN. FLOOR LEVEL UNDER COMPACTOR. EMERYVIUE, CALIFORNIA 94608

2. WALLS SHALL BE FINISHED WITH WASHABLE WATERPROOF SURFACE SUCH AS FRP P: 415.292.5400 . I @I. 00 I . -_-,, -"' OR HIGH-GLOSS ENAMEL PAINT, 8'-0" AFF . f:415.292.54 10 _,. !'.l> [email protected] I
~ 3. INSTALL WALL PROTECTION: 11-114"Hx6'W CONCRETE CURB AT BASE OF ALL NON-CONCRETE WALLS. ~·- ~ 4. 6'-0" ROLL UP DOOR AND 3FT EXIT DOOR. r- - 5. OC: ODOR CONTROL UNIT SHALL BE WALL-MOUNTED 60" AFF. REQUIRES 120V 15A •- SERVICE OUTLETS.
[~ti D) 2CY 6. HB: HOT AND COLD HOSE BIB SHALL BE WALL-MOUNTED 60" AFF. SALVATORE CARUSO LOOSE 7. PROVIDE ELECTRIC PALLET TRUCK FOR TRANSFERRING CONTAINERS. 4000Ib CONTAINER RECYCLING ·" CAPACITY; TURNING RADIUS: 45.5". REQUIRES 120V 15A SERVICE OUTLETS. er D) 8 8. (1) UNDEDICATED 120V 15A SERVICE OUTLET REQUIRED FOR STAFF MAINTENANCE ==o Q PURPOSE. .. - " ::I GENERAL NOTES: 0
er 1. ANY DESIGNS OR DESIGN SOLUTIONS PRESENTED IN THIS DRAWING OR LAMB PARTNERS ~
I
. SPECIFICATION, WHICH ARE DIRECT OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING NARRATIVES,

DRAWINGS, OR DIAGRAMS, ARE HEREBY CLARIFIED AS EXAMPLES AND SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE DESIGNS OR DESIGNS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION. OWl<!•ID!'ll!LOPal:
.- 2. OMISSIONS FROM DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS, OR THE INACCURATE

DESCRIPTION OF DETAILS OF WORK, WHICH ARE MANIFESTLY NECESSARY TO

CARRY OUT THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, OR WHICH ARE

CUSTOMARILY PERFORMED, SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM 3'-6)f 0 PERFORMING SUCH OMITTED OR INACCURATELY DESCRIBED DETAILS OF THE ' '
-,-(j),o I WORK. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED AS IF FULLY AND CORRECTLY SET FORTH AND " I I 6. co .. - DESCRIBED IN THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO I START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF . ALL EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS AND ANY DISCREPANCIES OR INCONSISTENCIES . . d . l,cv ,,-<'.l
. LOOSE lz CONTAINER

RECYCLING PROJECTED TRASH COLLECTION SCHEDULE / WK - COMMERCIAL I
~: SERVICE M T w T F Sa Su
, WASTE - 2CY LOOSE 1 1 1
. RECYCLING - 2CY - ,- 1 1 1 HB LOOSE ~- ~· ISSIJE/IIEV:S!ON ISSUEO BY _- d -- a . Q I
I n 1 ~
I TOTAL 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 MONROE STREET
-• __ - ,. t_.-_<>-
~' : ~
---- -
: .. Li.: --- --- --- ----
I

RETAIL TRASH COLLECTION ROOM
DAAWINGntU
COMMERCIAL TRASH COLLECTION ROOM PR<l~NO. --- LEVEL 1 -~ CM -- SB TR1.1 ~- 11/05/21
= 3/S"z l '-O"
4151
■
AMERICAN SHEET NOTES. TRASH MANAGEMENT SECTIONS AT RESIDENTIAL TRASH ROOM. LEVEL 1.

1. TRASH COLLECTION ROOM IS PART OF 2HR FIRE-RATED TRASH CHUTE SHAFT - AMERICAN TRASH MANAGEMENT ~
RESTRICTED ACCESS. 1900 POWELL STREET, SUITE 890

2. FLOOR SHALL BE FINISHED WITH WATERPROOF DECK COATING. FLOOR TO HAVE EMERYVIUE, CALIFORNIA 94608 MINIMAL SLOPE (1° MAX) ANO FLOOR DRAIN. FLOOR LEVEL UNDER COMPACTOR. P: 415.292.5400 f:415.292.5410 3. WALLS SHALL BE FINISHED WITH WASHABLE WATERPROOF SURFACE SUCH AS FRP [email protected] OR HIGH-GLOSS ENAMEL PAINT, 8'--0M AFF.
~=1:..~- 4. INSTALL WALL PROTECTION: 12•Hx6'W CONCRETE CURB AT BASE OF ALL ~·- NON-CONCRETE WALLS. DO NOT INSTALL THE CURB AROUND THE COMPACTOR OR ~ POWER PACKS. STEEL DIAMOND TREAD BACKING ALONG WALLS WHERE INDICATED ,=._~;==- FOR WALL PROTECTION.
__I " 5. ROOM SHALL BE MECHANICALLY VENTILATED WITH (1) CFM/FT PER 2019 CBC.

6. (1) 30"0 #304 S.S. GRAVITY CHUTE WITH COMPACTOR FOR WASTE. PROVIDE SALVATORE CARUSO - _711 CUSTOM 3CY FL NARROW COMPACTOR CONTAINERS FOR WASTE.

7. (1) 30"0 GALVANNEAL STEEL GRAVITY CHUTE WITH COMPACTOR FOR RECYCLING. - l LI ! PROVIDE CUSTOM 3CY FL NARROW COMPACTOR CONTAINERS FOR RECYCLING. ==o 8. CHUTES SHALL TERMINATE AT 5'-9" AFF. \ 9. THRU-WALL INTAKE FOR RESIDENTIAL TRASH AT LEVEL 1. PROVIDE (2) 18x18 SIDE _:,_,, " ··.:d HINGED, ELECTRICALLY INTERLOCKED, AUTOMATIC OPENING DOORS. SEE DETAIL k •--:-,- . - 2/TR2.0 .

L;...,, __ , 10. CHUTE DISCHARGE DOOR: TYPE-A, HORIZONTALLY INSULATED SLIDING-STEEL LAMB PARTNERS DOOR, HELD OPEN BY 165° F FUSIBLE LINK.
~ GENERAL NOTES. OWl<!•ID!'ll!LOPal:

1. ANY DESIGNS OR DESIGN SOLUTIONS PRESENTED IN THIS DRAWING OR

SPECIFICATION, WHICH ARE DIRECT OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING NARRATIVES,

DRAWINGS, OR DIAGRAMS, ARE HEREBY CLARIFIED AS EXAMPLES ANO SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE DESIGNS OR DESIGNS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION.

2. OMISSIONS FROM DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS, OR THE INACCURATE

DESCRIPTION OF DETAILS OF WORK, WHICH ARE MANIFESTLY NECESSARY TO

CARRY OUT THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, OR WHICH ARE

CUSTOMARILY PERFORMED, SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM PERFORMING SUCH OMITTED OR INACCURATELY DESCRIBED OET AILS OF THE •_,1<• rmu 3'-6" 0,C. WORK. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED AS IF FULLY ANO CORRECTLY SET FORTH ANO f.O. ~
c!-----~=== ~
DESCRIBED IN THE DRAWINGS ANO SPECIFICATIONS.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF (1)-- 1.1.STHL- - --- ALL EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS ANO ANY DISCREPANCIES OR INCONSISTENCIES. ,~- ,~- ~---~· ... :- -~:;;c:.·~-! llf.l lw~-~ ';'lk\ $ (j, 'F,,! -f, '-~ -•--•-: I :' :.at q __ J
--
a 2 --"""'" ,,..:= ~ =•= j d'
J ~ " " ~ ~ ~ =•- ~- ~· ISSIJE/IIEV:S!ON ISSUEO BY
is
~ ·- " "r' -J., \ ~ 0 0
I Rl!CTCLINO 11 wMn l nl n I I MONROE STREET
I Ill I II -·~ Ill "" w
t <··· > ; .. : .. !:". c·"'
.· -.. , <·1 '•:. ; \ :+ ·-·~ y .-- , f i ; ___ --: .. , , ;;·:,:;- -•. ,_· :-_·4-Cf" ' · .. -.~ _- . .} .- ~ . ___ .. ( •=•~-:J L::-===• ..... L:.. .. --, ~
L-·---~ rJ.:.~•-..,,- OOHT-AE-"'-
11·-o- SECTIONS AT
~ ~

RESIOENTIAL TRASH ROOM
DAAWINGntU
"""~"°- --- -~ CM
SECTIONS --· SB TRl.2 AT RESIDENTIAL TRASH ROOM ~· 11/05/21 = 3/16".,l'-O"
0 CHUTE INTAKE DOOR
. :,=,-:a,:-·
. ::-:ooE=.=--
=='.-:t, =-~,
m ,.,__,- -- "'-;"''"'-"' _ ..,....,. ....... ._;::. ___ __ C -- ::Z::."::.":"'.=·-

FLOOR SUPPORT FRAME ANCHORING
FIRE SPRINKLER DETAILS AND CHUTE SANITATION UNIT 7 ,..._,,...,_

MASON BRA-RED MOUNT
12 ~o~.: SUPPORT FRAME ANCHORING
----
~==-, • .;;;,.r,::;:::'""'
••

COMPACTOR & POWER PACK ANCHORING DETAILS
=~~=~ ___ "
( \ I I I I
: /,,./~ :
:':.. ,n•~~so. I I =~~"j~ : ~"" I }'.---EOOEOF30"1iH WJTE I

I / I I / I
\"---~------~"~1~)
•i!I· MINIMUM SHAFT DETAILS
8 "SOUND CONSULTANT

TO VERIFYDETAILS

AND UPDATE AS
NECESSARY"
'
.
4151 ■

AMERICAN

TRASH MANAGEMENT

AMERICAN TRASH MANAGEMENT
1900 POWELL STREET, SUITE 890
EMERYVIUE, CALIFORNIA 94608
P: 4 15.292.5400
F: 415.292. 54 10
[email protected]

SALVATORE CARUSO

LAMB PARTNERS

MONROE STREET
30"0 CHUTE DETAILS
TR2.0 11/05/21

AS SHOWN

"

#
"

$#
%&'(&)*&+&
,'-./+0-(1
$

%/'-2+)/'(/+3
4+/52'(6&+7
6&+7
)-(18&**

"

#
"

$#
%&'(&)*&+&
,'-./+0-(1
$

%/'-2+)/'(/+3
4+/52'(6&+7
6&+7

"

"

"

"

"

9:;:<=>?@ABCAA:B=?CA<D?AE
FCGA=CGA=C=H:ID;JK@;
A:?LHMC>HCC;N=H:ODP@Q?ACR:@D
BC>>?;C>=H:S@A=@PD@>@S=@=?CA
T>:@N@A;=H:UA?V:><?=WX
YZ[\]^_Z`\
OAH@AB:;?A=:><:B=?CA<?ABDK;:
<a:B?@Da@V?AL@=B>C<<G@DE<N
MKDMbCK=<ND?LH=?AL@A;C=H:>
a:;:<=>?@A@Q:A?=?:<X
S=>::=<B@a:?Qa>CV:Q:A=<G?=H?A
=H:FCGA=CGAcCBK<T>:@
?ABDK;:@<?LA@=K>:<?LA@L:N<=>::=
=>::@A;D@A;<B@a?AL<BH:Q:X
S=>::=<B@a:?Qa>CV:Q:A=<@DCAL
a:;:<=>?@ABCAA:B=?CA<:QaH@b
<?d:V?<K@DBCA=?AK?=WG?=H@
BCA<?<=:A=<=>::==>::@A;<?LA@L:
c>@AED?AS=>::=?<:e=:A;:;
=H>CKLH=Cf@BE<CAS=>::=N@A;
@B=?V:K<:<@>:CA=H:L>CKA;
gCC>X
h:H?BKD@>=H>CKLH<=>::=<@>:
:<=@MD?<H:;G?=H?A=H:FCGA=CGA
<Ka:>MDCBEXTaKMD?BL@=H:>?AL
<a@B:?<B:A=>@D=C=H:FCGA=CGAX
cK=K>:=>@A<?=DCCa=CBCAA:B=
FCGA=CGAG?=H=H:S@A=@PD@>@
S=@=?CAT>:@X
c?LK>:iXjbk
lmnopmnoqmrstuvwx
yz{|}~y|~y|}y

}yy|~|
}}|

City Council and Authorities ConcurrentAugust 22, 2023

City Council and Authorities Concurrent
August 22, 2023