City of Santa Clara
Meeting Agenda
Stevens Creek Corridor Steering Committee
Hybrid Meeting
City of Cupertino - Council
Chambers and Virtually
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3202
10:00 AMThursday, February 22, 2024
ZOOM WEBINAR REGISTRATION:
Webinar Registration - Zoom
To register and receive meeting login information, please visit:
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_0TItV4TVRBeR31taq43u1Q To submit comments during or before the meeting or participate via zoom, email: [email protected].
The Stevens Creek Corridor Steering Committee was created to provide guidance and oversee the planning work involved in the Stevens Creek Corridor Study, a collaborative effort between the Cities of San Jos é, Santa Clara, and Cupertino, the County of Santa Clara, and the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The Committee will improve transportation options along the corridor and increase the collaboration between the cities and agencies represented to bring our residents a more traversable and interconnected future.
Invited:
Vice Mayor Rosemary Kamei, City of San José, Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study Chair Councilmember Dev Davis, City of San José
Councilmember Hung Wei, City of Cupertino
Mayor Lisa Gillmor, City of Santa Clara
Councilmember Anthony Becker, City of Santa Clara
Supervisor Susan Ellenberg, Santa Clara County
Supervisor Cindy Chavez, Santa Clara County
Board Member Margaret Abe-Koga, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
1. Introductions
Roll Call of Steering Committee Members
Committee Chair Vice Mayor Kamei of San José to lead introductions of participating agencies.
2. Steering Committee administration
a. For Discussion and Action: Approve last meeting Minutes (November 3, 2023)
24-190
Approve last meeting minutesRecommendation:
3. Steering Committee Tour Debrief Discussion
Stevens Creek Corridor Steering
Committee
Meeting Agenda February 22, 2024
4. Phase 2 - Vision Statement Development Engagement Review
5. Draft Vision Statement Review and Adoption
a. For Discussion and Action: Approve Stevens Creek
Boulevard Corridor Vision Statement
24-224
Approve Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor
Vision Statement
Recommendation:
6. Alternatives and Implementation Approach
7. Next steps
A. For discussion and action: Future Steering Committee meeting dates/locations:
B. Proposed Dates
a. Meeting #4: Friday, May 17, 2024 - 9:00 AM - 11:00 AM b. Meeting #5: Thursday, September 5, 2024 - 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
8. Public Comment
Members of the Public are invited to speak on any item that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Committee. Meeting attendees are usually given two (2) minutes to speak on any discussion item and/or during the online ZOOM virtual webinar forum; the time limit is at the discretion of the Steering Committee and may be limited when appropriate. Speakers using a translator will be given twice the time allotted to ensure non-English speakers receive the same opportunity to directly address the Committee.
If you would like to provide public comment, please see the directions below. All members of the public will remain on mute until the individual identifies they would like to speak and then will be unmuted.
The procedure for this meeting is as follows during public comment:
● City Staff will call out names of the public who identified the items they want to speak on.
You may identify yourself by the “Raise Hand” feature on Zoom, or dial *9 on your phone. ● As your name is called, City Staff will unmute you to speak. After we confirm your audio is working your allotted time will begin.
9. Adjournment
Stevens Creek Corridor Steering
Committee
Meeting Agenda February 22, 2024
Electronic device instructions:
For participants who would like to join electronically from a PC, Mac, Ipad, iPhone or Android device, please register at the link below to receive information on how to access and participate in the meeting virtually:
To register and receive meeting login information, please visit:
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_0TItV4TVRBeR31taq43u1Q#/registrati on
Please ensure your device has audio input and output capabilities. During the session, if you would like to comment, please use the ‘raise hand’ feature in Zoom conference call.
1. Use a current, up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. Mute all other audio before speaking. Using multiple devices can cause audio feedback.
2. Enter an email address and name. The name will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak.
3. When the Chair calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on “raise hand.” Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak.
4. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted
Telephone device instructions:
To access the meeting via phone, please register for the meeting by clicking below and you will receive instructions on how to access the meeting via phone via email:
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_0TItV4TVRBeR31taq43u1Q#/registrati on
Public Comments prior to meeting: If you would like to submit your comments prior to or during the meeting, please email them to [email protected].
Comments received will be included as a part of the meeting record but will not be read aloud during the meeting.
The Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study is committed to open and honest government and strives to consistently meet the community’s expectations by providing excellent service, in a positive and timely manner, and in the full view of the public.
Stevens Creek Corridor Steering
Committee
Meeting Agenda February 22, 2024
You may speak to the Steering Committee about any discussion item that is on the agenda, and you may also speak during Public Comments on items that are not on the agenda and are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Steering Committee. Please be advised that, by law, the Steering Committee is unable to discuss or take action on issues presented during Public Comments. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, no matter shall be acted upon unless listed on the agenda, which has been posted not less than 72 hours prior to meeting. Agendas, Staff Reports, and some associated documents for agenda items may be viewed on the Internet at http://www.stevenscreekvision.com. All public records relating to an open session item on this agenda, which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, that are distributed to a majority of the legislative body will be available for public inspection by clicking the link associated specifically to documents on this agenda, at the same time that the public records are distributed or made available to the legislative body. Any draft resolutions or other items posted on the Internet site or distributed in advance of the commission meeting may not be the final documents approved by the commission. Contact the City of Cupertino for the final document.
On occasion the Steering Committee may consider agenda items out of order.
The Steering Committee meets occasionally, with special meetings as necessary.
To request an accommodation or alternative format under the Americans with Disabilities Act for City-sponsored meetings, events or printed materials, please call 408-777-3354 as soon as possible, but at least three business days before the meeting.
Please direct correspondence and questions to:
City of Cupertino
Department of Public Public Works
David Stillman
Transportation Manager
[email protected]
Tel: 408-777-3354
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
24-190 Agenda Date: 2/22/2024
REPORT TO STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR STEERING COMMITTEE
SUBJECT
For Discussion and Action: Approve last meeting Minutes (November 3, 2023)
ATTACHMENT
Stevens Creek Corridor Steering Committee Meeting - Minutes Nov 3, 2023 (DRAFT)
RECOMMENDATION
Approve last meeting minutes
City of Santa Clara Printed on 2/16/2024Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
Stevens Creek Corridor Steering Committee Meeting Summary (DRAFT) November 03, 2023, 10:00 AM
Hybrid Meeting
City of Santa Clara - City Hall Chambers
Steering Committee Members Present
Vice Mayor Rosemary Kamei, City of San José (Chair)
Mayor Hung Wei, City of Cupertino
Council Member Anthony Becker, City of Santa Clara
Supervisor Cindy Chavez, County of Santa Clara
Council Member Margaret Abe-Koga, City of Mountain View (representing VTA as a VTA Board Member on this Steering Committee)
Speakers Present:
Sean Daly, Consultant Team, Project Manager, Iteris
Christian Ollano, Consultant Team, Engagement Lead, Winter Consulting
Supporting Staff:
Ngan Nguyen, Engagement Coordinator, Winter Consulting
Stefania Diaz, Engagement Coordinator, Winter Consulting
Members of the Public Present:
In-Person Attendance:
Chris Giangreco
Jen Shearin
Virtual Attendance:
Alison Cingolani
Ben Aghegnehu
Daniel Hui
Debra Timmers
Helen Trollman
Helene Davis
Kathleen Elliott
Jennifer G
Linda Zazzara
Marieann Shovlin
Mary Cefalu
Ramses Madou
Randy Breunling
Randy Shingai
Sean Panchal
Seema Lindskog
Steve Chan
Sunil Plaha
Tracie Johnson
*Note that there were also members of the public present online without a name.
1. Welcome & Introductions
Vice Mayor Rosemary Kamei began the meeting with opening remarks, including an overview of the meeting agenda and logistics.
Consultant team member Christian Ollano called roll call to acknowledge present and absent Steering Committee members.
Members of the Steering Committee present at the time of roll call: Vice Mayor Kamei (City of San José); Councilmember Becker (City of Santa Clara); Mayor Wei (City of Cupertino); and Supervisor Chavez (County of Santa Clara).
2. Steering Committee Administration
Vice Mayor Rosemary Kamei led a discussion on the approval of the last meeting minutes and the adoption of Committee Bylaws, which included discussion on committee bylaw revisions/additions and identification of voting members.
● For discussion and action: Approval of meeting minutes ○ Vice Mayor Rosemary Kamei called for a motion to approve the minutes of the last Steering Committee meeting. No Steering Committee members proposed additional changes to the minutes.
■ Councilmember Anthony Becker motioned to approve the minutes of the June 23, 2023, Steering Committee Meeting, and Mayor Hung Wei seconded the motion.
■ During the vote, Council Member Margaret Abe -Koga chose to abstain from the motion (arrived at the meeti ng during discussion item).
● Motion carries to accept the previous meeting minutes unanimously.
● For discussion and action: Adopt Committee Bylaws
○ Vice Mayor Rosemary Kamei introduced the updated Committee Bylaws and asked the Steering Committee if there w ere any changes they would like to make to the Bylaws. No changes were requested. She then requested a motion to adopt the Committee Bylaws.
■ Councilmember Anthony Becker motioned to adopt the
Committee Bylaws, and Supervisor Cindy Chavez seconded the motion.
● Motion carries to adopt the Committee Bylaws,
unanimously.
3. Community engagement process to date
Christian Ollano from Winter Consulting led a presentation where he provided an overview of the community engagement that has been completed for Phase 1 of the Vision Study.
He also explained the distinctions between the Steering Committee, Community Advisory Group, and the Working Group, outlining their respective roles and levels of involvement throughout the Vision Study. Community engagement activities completed and discussed include:
● 3 pop-up tabling events (one in each city on the corridor) ● 1 webinar
● 1 Community Advisory Group meeting
● 1 community survey
● Website portal
Questions and comments from Steering Committee:
The members of the Steering Committee conveyed their appreciation for the positive outcome of the engagement so far and provided some considerations for the next phase of engagement. The following recommendations were made:
● Engage neighborhood and business communities who experience parking challenges throughout the next engagement phase.
● Consider how to balance community and commercial n eeds throughout the corridor.
Questions and comments from members of the public:
Members of the public who provided comments on this item suggested that the project team consider the car dealerships throughout the corridor as an asset to the community
that provides vital services. In addition, the public requested information on outreach efforts for car dealerships and associations.
● Chris Giangreco (in -person): Inquired with the consultant team about the approach they planned to take for the outreach activities aimed at car dealerships and associations. Additionally, he wants to know the timeline for the outreach efforts, the questions that would be asked, as well as how the data collected would be shared with the Steering Committee and the Community Advisory Group.
● Jennifer Sheeran (in-person): Encouraged the consultant team to conduct a one - on-one focus group with Walk Bike Cupertino.
4. Identified needs - CAG and engagement briefing
Consultant Sean Daly of Iteris led an informational presentation with an overview of the identified needs from the engagement results from the various forms of engagement that have been done to date. Key highlights include:
● 600+ comments from 300+ touchpoints.
● 140 location -specific responses from web surveys, pop- ups, and Community Advisory Group meetings.
● Key insights gathered from community engagement:
○ Safety surfaces as a top concern
○ The corridor is generally not pedestrian or bicycle-friendly ○ There are not enough transit operations/infrastructure options ○ There is hesitancy to reduce vehicle lanes
○ The overall environment of the corridor is conducive to driving Questions and comments from Steering Committee:
The Steering Committee members suggested that the consultant team should work with all the jurisdictions along the corridor and conduct an audit of their policies and ordinances to ensure alignment. They also asked the consultant team to engage with all segments of the community equally so that everyone could express their thoughts and feelings about the corridor. The Steering Committee members also requested information on how the data collected would be use d to develop recommendations. The following recommendations were made:
● Develop a community tool for assessing the corridor priorities and potential improvements.
● Take into consideration the adaptability of the corridor to future innovative transportation technologies.
Other Steering Committee comments:
● Switching to alternative modes of transportation is a great opportunity, given the data.
● Consider using the (Grand Boulevard Initiative) GBI process to determine similarities for the Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study. ● Consider doing corridor tours throughout each segment of the corridor. ● Consider incorporating different transportation modes harmoniously into the corridor.
● Plan for implementations that are achievable in the next 5 -10 years, as it will ensure readiness and potential for future opportunities and technologies. ● Consider the potential housing developments that can be implemented throughout the corridor.
5. Steering Committee needs input and vision statement guidance
Consultant Sean Daly of Iteris shared to the Steering Committee that the consultant team would like Steering Committee members to review and provide input/feedback on the needs input and vision statement by November 17, 2023, and may send to either Christian or Sean from the consultant team.
Questions and comments from Steering Committee:
● Steering Committee members made no questions or comments.
6. Next steps
● For discussion and action: Future Steering Committee meeting dates ○ Sean Daly of Iteris informed the Steering Committee that Steering Committee Meeting #3, previously scheduled for April 2024, has been rescheduled for January 2024, to accommodate for an additional Steering Committee meeting to approve a vision statement. He emphasized that the new date is not set in stone and is subject to change if necessary. Sean
also mentioned that the second Community Advisory Group will be held on December 7, 2023, where the Vision Statement will be refined and distilled for Steering Committee review and revision.
■ Council Member Anthony Becker proposed that the Steering Committee be a part of the corridor tour and requested that the Steering Committee work with Vice Mayor Rosemary Kamei to solidify a date.
■ Vice Mayor Rosemary Kamei informed the members that she would send out time frames to see what works for everyone. ■ Supervisor Cindy Chavez recommended that VTA start the tour at one end of the corridor and make its way to the other end of the corridor. She also mentioned that members of the Working Group and Community Advisory Group should be invited on the tour and then have different members from corresponding jurisdictions present their findings of the corridor tour.
■ Board Member Abe -Koga mentioned that she would like the corridor tour to take place before the adoption of the vision statement.
7. Public Comment
Vice Mayor Rosemary Kamei opened the floor for public comment, starting with in-person and then virtual.
● Chris Giangreco (in-person): Volunteered to help set up a walking tour for the western segment of the corridor. During the conversation, he mentioned that he knows the Vice Mayor is working with San Jose's Department of Transportation (DOT) to develop a traffic management plan for the upcoming holidays, but he worries that it might not be effective. He also commented on the innovation zone that former Vice Mayor Chappie Jones initiated.
● Jennifer Sheeran (in-person): Showed appreciation for the comments that were made regarding bike utilizations. She mentioned that if the corridor’s design was more bike-friendly, she could see people utilizing their bikes more to run errands and generally commute throughout the corridor. She also expressed that keeping things on a human scale can help improve safety throughout the corridor and suggested that the focus should be on a human scale. ● Jennifer (online): Commented that she is familiar with the different issues pertaining to Stevens Creek. She stated that because of her current state of health, she cannot use bikes as a mode of transportation, and because of this,
she depends on car usage. She also commented that none of the three cities, Santa Clara, San José, and Cupertino, have been certified in their housing element by HCD, and that because of this, they have been forced to rezone, which raises concerns for her.
● Tracy Johnson (online): Stated that some companies offer parking facilities on their premises to their employees, while others advise their employees to park in the nearby neighborhoods, which may pose concerns. Tracy also inquired whether the vision and implementation plan would be subject to public voting. ● Jennifer (online): Asked for clarification on how the housing elements of the three cities impact or change the corridor. Additionally, she mentioned that none of the three cities have been given certification by HCD. ● Jennifer (online): Stated that the housing element requires cities to rezone vast amounts of frontage on Stevens Creek Boulevard and San Carlos Boulevard.
High-rise buildings may require changes to the current frontage of the corridor which may affect public transportation. She mentioned that she is concerned about the loss of infrastructure and trees and that too many cut-outs will go to high-rise housing.
● Randy (online): Asked if it is a stated intent of the Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study to fight the climate crisis.
● Randy (online): Asked how all of the enthusiasm for adding bike lanes to various roads in the county translated into actual bike lane usage where bike lanes have previously been added. He also inquired if the City of San José or the county has statistics on bike lane usage.
● Jennifer (online): Stated that she wants the project team to ensure that the public is not excluded from the project.
● Randy (online): Asked if anything from this study will be actionable or if it is just a roadmap.
● Randy (online): Asked if achieving a 15-minute city is a defined objective for the Vision Study.
● Seema (online): Stated that she is very excited about this project and that she is really proud that the three cities have started collaborating. She also mentioned that she did some research on developments that will be happening along the corridor and found that there is a 59-unit housing development coming up on 3941 Stevens Creek in Santa Clara, a 250-room hotel in San José, and 267-unit apartment in Cupertino with an addition of another 9-unit development. This will result in many people and cars that will come into Stevens Creek Boulevard, and we need to come up with another mode of transportation to accommodate all of those people.
Questions and comments from Steering Committee:
● Councilmember Anthony Becker: Mentioned that he understands the concern with dealerships encouraging their staff to park in neighborhoods and has seen how permitted parking has now been enforced because of i t. Additionally, he encouraged the consultant team to host the corridor tour early in the new year.
He has also seen shoppers from Westfield Valley Fair park in neighborhoods to avoid paying parking fees at Valley Fair. He also mentioned that he would like to see some kind of pedestrian overhead crossing to avoid traffic congestion.
7. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 11:30 AM.
Please direct correspondence and questions to:
City of Santa Clara - City Hall Chambers
Attn: Mike Liw
1500 Warburton Ave, Santa Clara, CA 95050, USA
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
24-224 Agenda Date: 2/22/2024
REPORT TO STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR STEERING COMMITTEE
SUBJECT
For Discussion and Action: Approve Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Statement
ATTACHMENT
Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Statement (Draft)
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Statement City of Santa Clara Printed on 2/16/2024Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
DRAFT VISION STATEMENT FOR
THE STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD CORRIDOR
Purpose Statement
The Stevens Creek Boulevard/West San Carlos Street corridor is vital to Santa Clara Valley. Because of its importance, investments in multimodal improvements to pedestrian, bicycle, transit, vehicle1 and other modes of travel are continually made by the Cities of Cupertino, Santa Clara, and San José, Santa Clara County and VTA— the agencies that own, maintain, and operate the corridor. Coordination is essential for efficient and safe transportation operations across the corridor, but without a shared vision,2 long-term transportation goals cannot be achieved.
For this reason, the cities, County and VTA partnered to develop a vision statement3 to guide the cohesive, coordinated planning and management of future transportation improvements.4
A Steering Committee of elected officials from the participating agencies, a community advisory group, residents, businesses, and community groups5 provided the necessary leadership in a cooperative planning process to create a strong and sustainable Vision to guide corridor transportation investments for the next 50 years.6
2 Community one-on-ones
3 City of Santa Clara Resolution: Santa Clara staff and Councilmembers have participated in discussions with neighboring communities since a multi-jurisdictional group was established by the San José City Council on August 8, 2017, comprised of the cities of Santa Clara, San José, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to discuss key regional issues affecting West San José, with a focus on transportation and circulation. / The Cities of San José, Cupertino, Santa Clara, along with Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) jointly developed and submitted a grade-separated high-capacity transit concept along the Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission as part of the Plan Bay Area 2040 process (San José Resolution) 4 Each of the Agency Resolutions
5 Community one-on-one, Steering Committee one-on-one, Survey 1 and 2, CAG 6 Steering Committee one-on-ones
DRAFT VISION STATEMENT FOR
THE STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD CORRIDOR
Vision Statement
The Vision for transportation in the Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor is a complete multimodal roadway for the safe, effective and efficient use and enjoyment of all people.7
People will be served by a high-capacity transit system8 which includes separation from streets. This system, supported by active transportation enhancements will connect the Cities of Cupertino, Santa Clara, and San Jose from De Anza College to Diridon Station and Downtown San José within twenty minutes910 for reliable11 travel to local and regional destinations. Station areas will be activity centers for the prosperity and enjoyment of residents, businesses, and visitors.
7 Steering Committee one-on-one, VTA Complete Streets Policy of the County of Santa Clara (Resolution #BOS-2012-423) supports the design and building of a Complete Streets with optimize mobility for all transportation modes on County Facilities, The City of Santa Clara supports a study exploring transit options including Complete Streets along the Stevens Creek Boulevard corridor. / The Mobility Element of the City of Cupertino General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040) supports the design and building of Complete Streets which optimize mobility for all modes through Policy M-2.1, Street Design, and Policy M-2.2, Adjacent Land Use. / The City of Santa Clara adopted Resolution 18-8593 on August 21, 2018, which adopted a Complete Street Policy to support the design of roadways to safely accommodate all users including bicyclists, pedestrians, transit riders, children, senior citizens, disable people, and motorists. (Cupertino) The City Council supports ongoing conversations regarding high-capacity transit service along the Stevens Creek Boulevard/I-280 corridor, with the understanding that it would: Not use general purpose travel lanes or adversely impact vehicular capacity on City surface streets; Be grade separated, and time- competitive with auto travel; Study an alternative alignment in Cupertino along I-280, continuing to DeAnza College at the junction of SR-85 and Stevens Creek Boulevard, ensuring service to areas of high employment density and De Anza College, while connecting the Cities of San Jose, Santa Clara, and Cupertino, supported by, and developed in collaboration with, the Santa Clara VTA.
The (Cupertino) City Council supports the efforts to study improving transit efficiency and streetscape improvements along the Stevens Creek Boulevard corridor.
8 VTA, City of Santa Clara Resolution: The cities of Santa Clara, Cupertino, and San José along with VTA jointly developed and submitted a grade separated high-capacity transit concept along Stevens Creek Boulevard to the Plan Bay Area 2040 processes. 9 Visionary Network + VTP 2050 Community Based Organization Roundtable, 10 The Mobility Element of the City of Cupertino General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040) supports street design and amenities consistent with local transit goals to improve transit as a viable alternative to driving through Policy M-4.5, Access to Transit Services.
11 Steering Committee one-on-ones
DRAFT VISION STATEMENT FOR
THE STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD CORRIDOR
Values and Guiding Principles12
The corridor vision will be implemented in steps through the commitment of Corridor agencies to their shared purpose, vision, and values.
Ongoing Collaboration13
● Continually engage and collaborate with corridor users and decision-makers. ● Incrementally improve access, comfort, speed, and reliability of transit. ● Embrace technological innovations.
Safety of All Corridor Users14
● Eliminate transportation-related fatalities and severe injuries. ● Allow safe passage for vulnerable road users along and crossing the corridor. ● Provide safe space for each mode of transportation.
Create a Sustainable Environment to Prioritize People15 ● Maintain the corridor as a clean and inviting place.
● Provide green space and shade and support native wildlife and plants. ● Foster enjoyable public space.
A Transit Corridor16
● Increase transit frequency and speed.
● Favor transit travel time over auto travel time in roadway operations. ● Improve access and comfort of waiting for transit.
Convenience and Connectivity17
● Improve the convenience of travel.
● Ensure access and connectivity for all travelers through investment to meet resident and business needs.
● Enhance neighborhood and business access.
12 Guiding Principles developed through CAG and voted as priorities in the Phase 2: Vision Statement Development survey. 13 Principles from: Steering Committee, Agency one-on-ones, Community one-on-ones 14 Principles from: Steering Committee one-on-ones, Community one-on-ones, survey 1 15 Principles from: Steering Committee one-on-ones, CAG, Survey 1 16 Principles from: VTA Vision Roundtable, Survey 1, Community one-on-ones 17 Principles from: Community one-on-ones, Community Engagement – Santa Clara Farmers Market, Steering Committee one- on-ones, CAG, Survey 1