City of Santa Clara
Meeting Agenda
Stevens Creek Corridor Steering Committee
Hybrid Meeting
City of San José - Council
Chambers and Virtually
9:00 AMThursday, May 23, 2024
ZOOM WEBINAR REGISTRATION:
Webinar Registration - Zoom
To register and receive meeting login information, please visit:
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_A53u5o7LSBy9gxlk8kxOKg#/registra tion
To submit comments during or before the meeting or participate via zoom, email: [email protected].
The Stevens Creek Corridor Steering Committee was created to provide guidance and oversee the planning work involved in the Stevens Creek Corridor Study, a collaborative effort between the Cities of San Jos é, Santa Clara, and Cupertino, the County of Santa Clara, and the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The Committee will improve transportation options along the corridor and increase the collaboration between the cities and agencies represented to bring our residents a more traversable and interconnected future.
Invited:
Vice Mayor Rosemary Kamei, City of San José, Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study Chair Councilmember Dev Davis, City of San José
Councilmember Hung Wei, City of Cupertino
Mayor Lisa Gillmor, City of Santa Clara
Councilmember Anthony Becker, City of Santa Clara
Supervisor Susan Ellenberg, Santa Clara County
Supervisor Cindy Chavez, Santa Clara County
Board Member Margaret Abe-Koga, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
1. Introductions
Roll Call of Steering Committee Members
Committee Chair Vice Mayor Kamei of San José to lead introductions of participating agencies.
2. Steering Committee administration
a. For Discussion and Action: Approve last meeting minutes (February 22, 2024)
24-525
Approve last meeting minutesRecommendation:
3. Draft Vision Statement review and adoption
Stevens Creek Corridor Steering
Committee
Meeting Agenda May 23, 2024
a. For Discussion and Action: Adopt Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Statement
24-526
Adopt Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision
Statement
Recommendation:
4. Phase 3 - Vision implementation alternatives - Engagement review
5. Review of alternatives approach
6. Next Steps
a. For discussion and action: Future Steering Committee meeting dates/locations:
b. Proposed dates
a. Meeting #5: Thursday, September 5, 2024 - 9:00 AM - 11:00 AM
7. Public Comment
Members of the Public are invited to speak on any item that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Committee. Meeting attendees are usually given two (2) minutes to speak on any discussion item and/or during the online ZOOM virtual webinar forum; the time limit is at the discretion of the Steering Committee and may be limited when appropriate. Speakers using a translator will be given twice the time allotted to ensure non-English speakers receive the same opportunity to directly address the Committee.
If you would like to provide public comment, please see the directions below. All members of the public will remain on mute until the individual identifies they would like to speak and then will be unmuted.
The procedure for this meeting is as follows during public comment:
● City Staff will call out names of the public who identified the items they want to speak on.
You may identify yourself by the “Raise Hand” feature on Zoom, or dial *9 on your phone. ● As your name is called, City Staff will unmute you to speak. After we confirm your audio is working your allotted time will begin.
8. Adjournment
Note
Stevens Creek Corridor Steering
Committee
Meeting Agenda May 23, 2024
Electronic device instructions:
For participants who would like to join electronically from a PC, Mac, Ipad, iPhone or Android device, please register at the link below to receive information on how to access and participate in the meeting virtually:
To register and receive meeting login information, please visit:
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_A53u5o7LSBy9gxlk8kxOKg#/registration Please ensure your device has audio input and output capabilities. During the session, if you would like to comment, please use the ‘raise hand’ feature in Zoom conference call.
1. Use a current, up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. Mute all other audio before speaking. Using multiple devices can cause audio feedback.
2. Enter an email address and name. The name will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak.
3. When the Chair calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on “raise hand.” Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak.
4. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted Telephone device instructions:
To access the meeting via phone, please register for the meeting by clicking below and you will receive instructions on how to access the meeting via phone via email:
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_A53u5o7LSBy9gxlk8kxOKg#/registration Public Comments prior to meeting: If you would like to submit your comments prior to or during the meeting, please email them to [email protected]. Comments received will be included as a part of the meeting record but will not be read aloud during the meeting.
The Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study is committed to open and honest government and strives to consistently meet the community’s expectations by providing excellent service, in a positive and timely manner, and in the full view of the public.
Stevens Creek Corridor Steering
Committee
Meeting Agenda May 23, 2024
You may speak to the Steering Committee about any discussion item that is on the agenda, and you may also speak during Public Comments on items that are not on the agenda and are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Steering Committee. Please be advised that, by law, the Steering Committee is unable to discuss or take action on issues presented during Public Comments. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, no matter shall be acted upon unless listed on the agenda, which has been posted not less than 72 hours prior to meeting.
Agendas, Staff Reports, and some associated documents for agenda items may be viewed on the Internet at http://www.stevenscreekvision.com. All public records relating to an open session item on this agenda, which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, that are distributed to a majority of the legislative body will be available for public inspection by clicking the link associated specifically to documents on this agenda, at the same time that the public records are distributed or made available to the legislative body. Any draft resolutions or other items posted on the Internet site or distributed in advance of the commission meeting may not be the final documents approved by the commission. Contact the City of Cupertino for the final document.
On occasion the Steering Committee may consider agenda items out of order.
The Steering Committee meets occasionally, with special meetings as necessary.
To request an accommodation or alternative format under the Americans with Disabilities Act for City-sponsored meetings, events or printed materials, please call 408-975-3283 as soon as possible, but at least three business days before the meeting.
Please direct correspondence and questions to:
City of San José
Division Manager, Planning, Policy, and Sustainability
Department of Transportation
Ramses Madou
City of San José
[email protected]
Tel: 408-975-3283
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
24-525 Agenda Date: 5/23/2024
REPORT TO STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR STEERING COMMITTEE
SUBJECT
For Discussion and Action: Approve last meeting minutes (February 22, 2024)
ATTACHMENT
Stevens Creek Corridor Steering Committee Meeting - Minutes February 22, 2024 (DRAFT)
RECOMMENDATION
Approve last meeting minutes
City of Santa Clara Printed on 5/13/2024Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
DRAFT
StevensCreekCorridorSteeringCommittee MeetingMinutesFebruary22,2024@10:00AM-12:00PMHybridMeeting CityofCupertinoCityHall,CommunityRoomandZoom SteeringCommitteeMembersPresentViceMayorRosemaryKamei,CityofSanJosé(Chair)CouncilmemberHungWei,CityofCupertino CouncilmemberAnthonyBecker,CityofSantaClara Speakers:SeanDaly,IterisChristianOllano,WinterConsulting SupportingStaff:NganNguyen,WinterConsultingStefaniaDiaz,WinterConsulting MembersofthePublicPresent:
In-PersonAttendance:CarlinBlackJenniferGriffinChappieJonesJenniferShearin MatthewSchroeder,CityofCupertinoDavidStillman,CityofCupertinoMichaelLiw,CityofSantaClaraJohnSighamony,VTABenAghegnehu,CountyofSantaClara VirtualAttendance:
BrianBakhtiariMaryCefaluAnnFerrisRhodaFryNicoleHe
TracieJohnsonJordanMoldowKittyMooreIshikaNarainCalleyWangLisaWarren Page1
DRAFT
1. Welcome&Introductions
Vice MayorKameiof SanJoséto welcomeattendeesandleadintroductionsofparticipatingagencies.
2. SteeringCommitteeAdministrationforDiscussionandAction a. Approval ofMeetingMinutesforSteeringCommitteeMeetingonNovember23rd,2023I. CouncilmemberBeckermotionstoaccepttheminutes.II. CouncilmemberWeisecondsthemotion.III. Motioncarriesandminutesareunanimouslyapproved.
3. SteeringCommitteeTourDebriefDiscussion
a. SeanDalypresentsoverviewofhighlightsontheSteeringCommitteeTourI. Thetourbeganat DiridonStationandendedat theDeAnza Collegecampus.II. Observationpointsinbetweenthedestinationsinclude:● WestSanCarlosUrbanVillage● ValleyFairMall/SantanaRow● LawrenceExpressway b. SteeringCommitteeComments:
I. ChairViceMayorKameiexpressedgratitudefortheengagement teamthat facilitatedthetourandparticipantsforjoiningthecorridortour.ViceMayornotesthat thetouriscomprehensive andinformative,providinganin-personexperienceofwhatitisliketotraverseonthecorridor.
II. CouncilmemberWeiexpressedinterest inthelandcurrentlyservingasparkinglotsonDeAnza College campus,whichcouldbe transformedinto a majortransithubforCupertinoandthewesternregionoftheSouthBay.
III. CouncilmemberBeckerexpressedgratitudetothestaff forcoordinatingandfacilitatingthetour, whichwasa significant moment forreflection,providinginsight intothesafetybenefitsofprotectedbikelanes.HealsorecalledformerCityofSanJoséViceMayorChappieJones’visionforthecorridor, whichcalledfor strongcollaborationamongthejurisdictionsinvolved.
Page2
DRAFT
IV. ViceMayorKameibelievedthetourhighlighteda needto collaboratewithDeAnza College to explore what might besomeoftheadditionalareasofimprovementonthecorridor V. CouncilmemberBecker identifiedthechallengesofconnectingtransitusers totheirlast mileandcalledforconsiderationofseniorsandpeoplewithdisabilitiesalongsideany othercommunitymembers that aredependentontransit.
VI. ViceMayorKameicommentedthat thesizeofthesidewalkplaysahugerolein pedestriancomfortandaccessibility, particularlyfor thoseinwheelchairs. c. PublicCommentontheTour:
I. Jennifer Shearin:Othertours involvingcommunitymembers andorganizationswere alsoconducted.Jenniferparticipatedinandhelpedcoordinate oneof thesetours, specificallythebikingtour. Thistouroffered a distinctperspective on bikingalongthe corridor. Whilepredominantly attendedby Cupertinoresidents and coveringtheCupertinoportionofStevensCreekBlvd,itstillyieldedvaluableinsightsintopotentialimprovementsbeneficialtoallcorridorusers.
II. Jennifer Griffin:Jennifer was unaware of theothertours mentionedearlier, havingonlybeeninformedabouttheSteeringCommitteetour.DuringtheSteeringCommitteetour, sheemphasizedtheimportanceofconsideringindividualswitha diverserange ofabilitylevelsandsizes,whonavigate thecorridor. Sensitivityto thechallenges facedby theelderlyanddisablediscrucial.JenniferalsostressedthesignificanceofupholdingCupertinovalues,particularlythepreservationorexpansionofgreeneryalongthecorridor. d. OnlinePublicComment:
I. JordanMoldow:Echoingthesentimentsoftheprevioustwospeakers,itissuggestedthat atourbearrangedforthosemembers ofthedisabilitycommunity. Additionally, there is a desire to have presentationsonalltransportationaudits.It is recommendedthat theSteeringCommitteeconductthesecorridorauditsperiodically, consideringthepotentialturnoverin SteeringCommitteemembers next year. Furthermore,it isproposedtoorganizetoursoflocationsweaspiretoemulatewiththeaimtogatherinsightsfromotherregions.
Page3
DRAFT
II. KirkVartan:RegardingtheValleyFairsectionoftheSteeringCommitteetours,theretailareasonWinchesterencirclingthemallarenotedtobehighlycongested andintense.Theimpendingdevelopments in thevicinity, includingthe17-storyprojectbyPruneyardonWinchester,mustbefactoredintotheplanningprocess.Thevisionshouldincorporatethepossibilityofabove-groundparks andpedestrianamenitiesto enhanceeaseoftravelandproviderestingspacesinthearea.
4. Phase2-VisionStatementDevelopmentEngagementReview
a. ChristianOllano, Winter Consulting, presented an overview of Phase2EngagementActivities:
I. Phase2engagementincludedthefollowingactivities:● Phase2Webinar● CommunityAdvisoryCommitteeMeeting● 1:1InterviewswithAutoDealerships● WinchesterOrchardNeighborhoodAssociationPopIn● BikeTourwithWalkBikeCupertinol● Phase2Survey● SteeringCommitteeTour b. PublicComment
I. Therewerenopubliccomments.
5. DraftVisionStatementReviewandAdoption
a. DiscussionandAction:StevensCreekBlvdCorridorVisionStatement I. SeanDaly, Iteris,providedanoverviewofVisionStatementdevelopmentandcurrentdraftofVisionStatement.
II. Visionstatementisinthreepartsandavailableonlineforpublicreview.
III. Top5VisionSafetyConceptsdevelopedwithCommunityAdvisoryGroupandpublicfeedback:● Eliminatetransportationdeathsandsevereinjuries● Spaceforeachmodeoftransportation(bike,walk,drive)● Saferoutestoschools● Vehiclespeedreduction● Reduceintersectioncrossingdistance Page4
DRAFT
IV. Top5 Scale/Streetscapeconcepts developedwithCommunityAdvisoryGroupandpublicfeedback:● MaintenanceandCleanliness● EnjoyablePublicSpace● Improvedgreenspaceandshade● Supportnativeplantingandwildlife● Qualitysignageandcorridoridentity V. Top5 Timeconcepts developedwithCommunityAdvisory Groupandpublicfeedback:● Transitfrequency● Comfortabletransitwaittimes● Implementationtimeofimprovements● Traveltimebybus● Traveltimebycar VI. Top5 AccessconceptsdevelopedwithCommunityAdvisory Groupandpublicfeedback:● Convenience● Equitableaccessandconnectivityforalltravelers● Connectivitytootheramenities● Neighborhoodaccess● Busstopaccessibility b. SteeringCommitteeQuestionsandComments
I. CouncilmemberWeiadvocatedforprioritizingconsiderationsforFoothillBlvd access,mentioningthat the neighborhoodstandsto benefitsignificantlyfromenhancedconnectivityalongthiscorridor, particularlygivenitsproximityto essentialamenitiessuchaspost offices,aswellastheongoingdevelopmentofresidentialandretailspaces.
II. CouncilmemberBecker echoedCouncilmemberWei’s sentimentsregardingconnectingtheFoothillarea.
III. ViceMayorKameiemphasizedtheimportanceofsafetymeasureswhilealsoacknowledgingthedesire for efficient travel throughtheregion.Twentyminute travelthroughoutthecorridorcanbeniceforusers buttheremaybetradeoffs worthconsidering.ViceMayorKameiquestionedifthereexistedmodelsforavisionoftransportationonthecorridor.
Page5
DRAFT
● JohnSighamony,VTA:ThereistheBusRapidTransitinAlumRock,East SideSanJosé.Therearealsoseveralcompletestreetstudies;oneof thembeingontheBascomcorridor, whichis currentlyunderconstruction.VTAalsodidastudyfortheTasmancorridor.
IV. CouncilmemberBeckeradvocatedforprioritizingthequalityoflifeandensuringa positive impactonbusinessesalongthecorridor. DrawingfromthelessonslearnedontheElCaminocorridorinSantaClara,thereisavaluableopportunitytoapplysimilarstrategiestoenhancetheStevensCreekBlvdCorridor. Theincorporationofdesignatedbuslanesstandsoutas a particularlybeneficial amenity, aligningwith the visionofestablishinghigh-qualitytransitinfrastructure that servestheneedsofthecommunityeffectively, andincludingatransithubatDeAnzaCollegeseemslikeagreatwaytoformconnectionsforthecorridortootherareaslikeFoothill.
V. CouncilmemberWeiwouldlikeStevensCreekBlvdtobeamodelforhighcapacity, highspeedtransitwhilecoexistingwithpedestrianandbikeinfrastructure.
VI. CouncilmemberBeckerwouldliketogetanunderstandingofwhetherornot the innovationzoneinitiative willbe conducive to thevisionstatement orconflict.Thecontentionbehindthetermmultimodalmaynotbeinclusivelanguage. c. PublicComment
I. CarlinBlackadvocatedforrepurposingKielyto Albany intoadedicatedbikeandpedestrianlanespanningtheentirecorridor,aimingtopromotesustainabletransportationandenhancecommunityconnectivityandwell-being.
II. JenniferShearinofferedcriticalfeedbackonthelanguage presentedinthe visionstatement. Whilethe term "multimodal"may suggestpedestrianenhancements, it actuallyencompassesvariousmodesoftransportation.Shehighlights thedistinctionthat pedestriansprimarilyutilize sidewalks,nottheroadway. Additionally, Shearinraisesconcernsaboutthechallengesofcars sharingtheroadwithbikes,suggestingthattheterm"multimodal"may oversimplify considerationsby groupingallmodesoftransportationtogether. There are goalsofa20-minutetravel Page6
DRAFT
timefortransitbutwedonotseethatsameconversationforcyclistsandpedestrians,sopleaseaddthattothevision.
III. JenniferGriffinprovidedfeedbackonspecificsectionsofthecorridor.Griffinwants to ensure that thisvisionis notdominatedby any oneparticularcityorjurisdiction.Shewouldlike to seeconsiderationsforseveral college campuseswhosestudents are likelyusingthecorridor,suchasSanJoséStateUniversityandSanJoséCityCollege. d. PublicCommentsOnline:
I. JordanMoldowcommentedthat havingconnectionstoDiridonandSJSUwouldbeideal.Whilethereismuchemphasisontransit,thereshouldbethesameemphasisonbike andpedestrianinfrastructure. HavingBusRapidTransit,busprioritysignaling, andlevelboardingat stops wouldmaketransitlogisticssmootheranddecreasewaittimes.
II. Calley Wang suggested othermodes,particularlypedestrianandbicycling, shouldbe namedspecificallyratherthangeneralized andconflatedwithtransit.Transitvisionshouldincludeseamlessconnectionsto future transitdevelopments. There shouldbe clarificationanddefinitionof‘thecorridor.’ Somestreetsthat are parallelorconnecttoStevensCreekplay a huge rolein itsactivity, soit wouldbegoodtoconsiderthoseimpacts.
SteeringCommitteemembersunanimouslydecidedto holdformalvotingofthevisionstatement draftto thefollowingSteeringCommitteemeetinginMayto seea revisedversionincorporatingtheirinputfromthismeeting.
6. AlternativesandImplementationApproach
a. SeanDalyprovidedoverviewpresentationofImplementationAlternativesandApproach b. PublicComment
I. JordanMoldow noted that SanJoséhasa transit-first policy, whichempowers theCityto remove carlanestoaddtransitdesignatedlanes.Theothertwo participatingcitiesoftheprojectdonothave thesamepoliciesandshouldconsideradopting.Easeof boardingontransitisessentialto accessibilityandreducingtransitwaittimes.Havingtransit Page7
DRAFT
stops onplatformscanmake it harderforpeoplewithdisabilitiestoaccessaswell.
II. JenniferGriffinechoedJordan’scommentsregardingaccessibility.E-bikesshouldbediscussedwhenconsideringsafetymeasuresforpedestriansandcyclists.
7. NextSteps
a. Fordiscussionandaction:FutureSteeringCommitteemeetingdates/locations:
b. ProposedDatesI. Meeting#4:Friday,May17,2024-9:00AM-11:00AMII. Meeting#5:Thursday,September5,2024-10:00AM-12:00PMIII. NextmeetingwillbehostedintheCityofSanJosé. c. ChristianOllanoannouncedupcomingeventsandtransportationauditsthatwillbepostedonthewebsite.Upcomingmeetingswillalsobeannouncedonline.
8. GeneralPublicComment
a. Jennifer Griffinwouldlike to seeall announcements andupdates on thestevenscreekvision.comsoitiseasiertofindandparticipate. b. Jordan Moldow expressedgratitudefor onlinepubliccomment andparticipation.Integrationwithmicromobilitysystemswasnotdiscussedaspartoftheprojectvision.TheCityofSanJoséandCountyofSantaClaraarelookinginto micromobilitydevelopments, so it may be helpful to considertheseintegrationstoensureeffectiveconnectivity.
Meetingadjournedat11:45AM.
Pleasedirectcorrespondenceandquestionsto:
CityofCupertinoDepartmentofPublicPublicWorksDavidStillmanTransportationManagerDavidS@cupertino.govTel:408-777-3354 Page8
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
24-526 Agenda Date: 5/23/2024
REPORT TO STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR STEERING COMMITTEE
SUBJECT
For Discussion and Action: Adopt Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Statement
ATTACHMENT
Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Statement (Draft)
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Statement City of Santa Clara Printed on 5/13/2024Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
DRAFT VISION STATEMENT FOR
THE STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD CORRIDOR
Purpose Statement
The Stevens Creek Boulevard/West San Carlos Street corridor from Foothill Boulevard to Diridon Station is vital to Santa Clara Valley.
The corridor serves 100,000 people and 80,000 jobs within ½ mile of the roadway, forecast to grow to 120,000 people and 100,000 jobs by 2040. • One third of corridor residents are under 18 years old, forecast to raise to over 40 percent by 2040
• Almost 20 percent of corridor residents have a household income under $50,000 per year.
• 65 percent of households speak languages other than English and over 30 percent have low English proficiency.
• 7.5% have a disability
• 5.5% live in households without an automobile
The Cities of Cupertino, Santa Clara, San José, Santa Clara County, and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)—the local government agencies responsible for transportation in the Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor—are committed to continuous investment for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and drivers. We recognize to unlock the corridor's full potential it is essential to have a shared vision for long-term transportation goals.
Recognizing the need for a unified approach, the cities, county, and VTA partnered to develop this Vision Statement. This Vision will guide the future of the corridor, ensuring cohesive planning and coordinated management of transportation improvements.
A Steering Committee of elected officials from the participating agencies, a community advisory group, residents, businesses, and community groups provided the necessary leadership in a cooperative planning process to create a strong and sustainable Vision to guide corridor transportation investments for the next 50 years.
DRAFT VISION STATEMENT FOR
THE STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD CORRIDOR
Vision Statement
The Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor transportation infrastructure changed little in the past 50 years while the area it serves grew into a worldwide hub of innovation. Therefore, we envision the transportation corridor our community deserves to support continued residential and commercial vibrancy: safe and enjoyable travel for people of every age, ability, and chosen mode.
Residents, businesses, and visitors would be served by:
● A high-capacity transit system supported by station access enhancements to reliability connect the Cities of Cupertino, Santa Clara, and San José from De Anza College to Diridon Station and Downtown San José within twenty minutes for reliable travel to local and regional destinations. Station areas would be well-maintained and inviting community assets. ● A stress-free and enjoyable walking and bicycling environment. High-quality pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure would be prioritized to connect neighborhoods to the corridor within a 20-minute walk of transit stops. ● Safe and efficient vehicle travel would be accommodated for connections to neighborhoods, businesses, and expressways and freeways.
This Vision would be implemented by an open and inclusive process of continuous evaluation to promote equitable access and use.
DRAFT VISION STATEMENT FOR
THE STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD CORRIDOR
Values and Guiding Principles
The corridor Vision would be implemented in steps. The committed shared purpose, vision, and values of the Cities of Cupertino, San Jose, and Santa Clara, Santa Clara County and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) will guide the Vision implementation process:
Ongoing Collaboration
● Continually engage and collaborate with corridor users and decision-makers. ● Incrementally improve access, comfort, speed, and reliability of transit. ● Embrace technological innovations.
Safety of All Corridor Users
● Eliminate transportation-related fatalities and severe injuries. ● Allow safe passage for vulnerable road users along and crossing the corridor. ● Reduce the level of stress and increase the accessibility of walking and biking Create a Sustainable Environment to Prioritize People
● Design for all ages, abilities, and incomes of users
● Maintain the corridor as a clean and inviting place.
● Provide green space and shade and support native wildlife and plants. ● Foster enjoyable public space.
A Transit Corridor
● Increase transit frequency and speed.
● Favor transit travel time over auto travel time in roadway operations. ● Improve access and comfort of waiting for transit.
Convenience and Connectivity
● Improve the convenience of travel.
● Ensure access and connectivity for all travelers through investment to meet resident and business needs.
● Enhance neighborhood and business access.