Final Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program — City Council and Authorities Concurrent, November 12, 2024 (part 6 of 7)

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the H-205
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

Personal observation#5: The picture is taken conveniently from the other side of the railway line which is actually Kingsbury street, inside a private community and not Lafayette street. This is further away from the proposed SVP lines. This is very misleading; see snapshots taken from Google maps below

H-206
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
And this is what is included on the report:

The Mission Garden Townhome community has no walls as such and the main entry to residences face the road directly and are the most impacted. There are several other single family homes on Lafayette street with the same impact, having an entryway directly on the street. This and including other citations of reusing sections of older reports, is all in all absolutely unacceptable and instills distrust. This further shows incompetency of the agency/ agencies preparing this report.

Conclusion: This project's initial study needs to expand beyond CEQA for approval from the public. The limited scope of CEQA has failed to address the following concerns we have:
• Health hazards due to EMF levels.- This is by far the gravest concern and CEQA is clearly not qualified to study that.
• Reduced property values- several references provided below. • Loss of Aesthetic appeal for potential real estate buyers/ new and current businesses. • Increase in audible noise levels during and post construction, which is already high in the area with presence of railway line and air traffic route.
• Increased fire hazard/ risk of other accidents.
• Induced current on railway lines with close proximity/ corona effect- CEQA report did not clearly address this for a 115KV line.
• Economic effect on the community from small to larger scale based on all of the above.

We request further investigation and revisit other routes or proposals to resolve the power needs of the city. We have to ensure our and our kids’ health is not at stake in the name of development and infrastructure and are not in agreement for this project to move forward. We cannot approve this to move forward as of now given the lack of study and absence of a satisfactory solution/ mitigation provided in favor/ assurance to public health.

H-207
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

2. https://www.epa.gov/radtown/electric-and-magnetic-fields-power-lines This resource suggests taking precautions and keeping distance or limiting exposure. Residents would no longer have either of these two options per the current proposals if they are living there 24-7.

3. https://www.fastexpert.com/blog/should-i-buy-a-house-near-power-lines/ These are points of view from a real estate expert who clearly states that property value declines proportionately to the distance of the property from high tension lines. People have apprehensions whether or not research clearly defines the risk. Potential buyers might have low priority for a property too close to a high tension power line.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

Thanks,
Candida

H-208
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Johny Rufus John <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 12:46 PM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

To Whomsoever it may concern,
We are residents of Santa Clara that will be negatively impacted by the “NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project”. We have collectively reviewed the draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative declaration for “NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project” from July 2024. After reviewing this report and also attending the virtual and in person meetings, here are some references to emphasize our various concerns.

Reference #1 : CEQA’s reporting includes these State reviewing agencies: California Air Resources Board (ARB), California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Bay Delta Region 3 (CDFW), California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), California Department of Parks and Recreation, California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), California Department of Transportation, District 4 (DOT), California Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics (DOT), California Department of Transportation, Division of Transportation Planning (DOT), California Department of Water Resources (DWR), California Energy Commission, California Highway Patrol (CHP), California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), California Natural Resources Agency, California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region 2 (RWQCB), Office of Historic Preservation, State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water.

Personal observation#1 : None of these agencies has any association with human health. CEQA reporting is not qualified enough to force the public to compromise on health concerns. Other agencies need to be involved to review this proposal, that are qualified to study the effect on “ humans”, not just wildlife and vegetation, or “ environment. The checklist is completely devoid of our gravest humanitarian concerns. It is quite shocking that the project has not included any study to understand the potential impact of EMF waves on human lives, given that the transmission lines are potentially less than 60 feet from the closest dwellings. The city of Santa Clara needs to step in and have third party/ independent studies completed in favor of human health.

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

Personal observation#2 : This consideration was completely absent earlier. Only after the residents raised their voices, this section was added. To our greatest disappointment, this section is copied over from an older report on the “South Loop Reconfiguration Project” from 2020. One would have expected that a new study would have been conducted for a project this size. The lack of due diligence and ignorance towards the specifics of this project are apparent and not acceptable. In fact we have found several sections of this older report as being reused across the entire report.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would H-209
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

There are not enough references listed in the draft report provided to us, and the explanation provided seems to be conveniently using studies that prove otherwise. This needs more investigation and references. The solution provided as raising the height of the poles and increasing the distance is non- existent. It was confirmed during the in person meeting that the design will not be altered and the height was already designed as required according to the SVP team present there. It seems that the preparers of this report did not even read the report after copying pasting from the old report as evident in the list of proposed solutions is not applicable here.

The live presentation on August 22nd showed the comparison of EMF values of household objects as a means to show that everyday household items carry a similar range of mG( milli Gauss) units. This comparison was inherently flawed since it mentioned that the household devices were producing those level at 1 feet while those indicated for 115KVf lines were at 60 feet. further these household devices do not operate 24X7 similar to the transmission lines.

There were a lot of citations of reports showcasing that no clear proof of EMF to human health exists but we would like to also point out certain states like Connecticut Department of Public Health have cited reports that have shown an increased incidence of childhood leukemia( Blood cancer) at avg exposure of only 3 mG. Also they have called out that some utility workers exposed to high levels of emf have increase risks of Lur Gehrig's disease.

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

These are available on Page 2 & Page 3 of this report: https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/departments- and-agencies/dph/dph/environmental_health/eoha/pdf/emffactsheet2008pdf.pdf This report has citations from WHO , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and California Department of Health Services.
https://www.niehs.nih.gov/sites/default/files/health/materials/electric_and_magnetic_fields_associ ated_with_the_use_of_electric_power_questions_and_answers_english_508.pdf Some other questions around the EMF study map shared during presentation on Aug 22 2024:

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

6. ⁠What happens when electrification of rail lines happens- as this is already planned for the future? Have you potentially considered the cumulative EMF effect in coexistence of the high power lines and with railway lines’ electrification? Will the EMF values not be much higher then? H-210
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

10. Why does the electric pole structure proposed have wider diameter at the top? Can you share the design of the top of the pole ? Can it be extended by adding another section by bolting, welding or any other method? If so, what extra voltage can be added to the line?

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Personal observation#3
The railway line's proximity to the proposed high transmission lines is very concerning. The centerline distance from proposed lines to railway line is aproximately 50 feet per google maps with some margin for error. As per the report there are no Corona rings proposed for the 115KV lines. There seems to be negligence in design in consideration of the hazards posed by these high voltage lines as Corona effect can transfer current to railway lines. All the residents are at a high risk of accidental hazards given the proximity of the railway line, this project is adding on to the hazards. This section is only stating information about what Corona effect is, as may be required by law, which by the way is again a copy paste from an old report. The only concern discussed in more depth is the audible noise level. The concerns are presented to imply that this is not significant by stating that 115KV lines pose less than significant risk.

Reference #4: Post meeting material from March 19th 2024 @https://santaclara.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6582415&GUID=E6E14646-3CF7-4D15- BB98-F18580696012&Options=&Search=
Personal observation#4: At surface level, it looks like Option #A was selected only based on Cost perspective, without any consideration to human health, young children, property values, Corona effect, long term sustainability perspective or any other factors. While its important to understand the results of CEQA study, its extremely critical to understand the negative impact of EMF on the many young children living around the proposed transmission lines. Without extensive research and study on the impact to young children and adult heath, we should not be approving such an incomplete proposal.

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the H-211
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-212
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
And this is what is included on the report:

H-213
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

Thanks,
Johny

H-214
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: MEHUL SURESH JAIN <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 12:38 PM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

To Whomsoever it may concern,

We are residents of Santa Clara that will be negatively impacted by the “NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project”. We have collectively reviewed the draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative declaration for “NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project” from July 2024. After reviewing this report and also attending the virtual and in person meetings, here are some references to emphasize our various concerns.

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would H-215
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

6. ⁠What happens when electrification of rail lines happens- as this is already planned for the future? Have you potentially considered the cumulative EMF effect in coexistence of the high power lines and with railway lines’ electrification? Will the EMF values not be much higher then? H-216
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the H-217
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-218
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
And this is what is included on the report:

We demand further investigation and revisit other routes or proposals to resolve the power needs of the city. We have to ensure our and our kids’ health is not at stake in the name of development and infrastructure and are not in agreement for this project to move forward. We cannot approve this to move forward as of now given the lack of study and absence of a satisfactory solution/ mitigation provided in favor/ assurance to public health.

H-219
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

Best Regards,
Mehul Jain

H-220
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Priyadarshini Vijayakumar <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 11:52 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would H-221
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C? H-222
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Personal observation#3

The railway line's proximity to the proposed high transmission lines is very concerning. The centerline distance from proposed lines to railway line is aproximately 50 feet per google maps with some margin for error. As per the report there are no Corona rings proposed for the 115KV lines. There seems to be negligence in design in consideration of the hazards posed by these high voltage lines as Corona effect can transfer current to railway lines. All the residents are at a high risk of accidental hazards given the proximity of the railway line, this project is adding on to the hazards. This section is only stating information about what Corona effect is, as may be required by law, which by the way is again a copy paste from an old report. The only concern discussed in more depth is the audible noise level. The concerns are presented to imply that this is not significant by stating that 115KV lines pose less than significant risk.

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough H-223
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-224
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
And this is what is included on the report:

H-225
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

Regards,
Priya

H-226
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Manojkumar Mohanram <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 11:51 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would H-227
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C? H-228
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Personal observation#3

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough H-229
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-230
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
And this is what is included on the report:

H-231
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

Regards,
Manoj

H-232
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Anupama Lolage-Baheti <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 11:12 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

H-233
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
https://psc.wi.gov/Documents/Brochures/EMF.pdf

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

These are available on Page 2 & Page 3 of this report: https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/departments-and- agencies/dph/dph/environmental_health/eoha/pdf/emffactsheet2008pdf.pdf This report has citations from WHO , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and California Department of Health Services.
https://www.niehs.nih.gov/sites/default/files/health/materials/electric_and_magnetic_fields_associated_wit h_the_use_of_electric_power_questions_and_answers_english_508.pdf Some other questions around the EMF study map shared during presentation on Aug 22 2024:

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Personal observation#3
The railway line's proximity to the proposed high transmission lines is very concerning. The centerline distance from proposed lines to railway line is aproximately 50 feet per google maps with some margin for H-234
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
error. As per the report there are no Corona rings proposed for the 115KV lines. There seems to be negligence in design in consideration of the hazards posed by these high voltage lines as Corona effect can transfer current to railway lines. All the residents are at a high risk of accidental hazards given the proximity of the railway line, this project is adding on to the hazards. This section is only stating information about what Corona effect is, as may be required by law, which by the way is again a copy paste from an old report. The only concern discussed in more depth is the audible noise level. The concerns are presented to imply that this is not significant by stating that 115KV lines pose less than significant risk.

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

And this is what is included on the report:

Conclusion: This project's initial study needs to expand beyond CEQA for approval from the public. The limited scope of CEQA has failed to address the following concerns we have:

Health hazards due to EMF levels.- This is by far the gravest concern and CEQA is clearly not qualified to study that.

Reduced property values- several references provided below.

Loss of Aesthetic appeal for potential real estate buyers/ new and current businesses.

Increase in audible noise levels during and post construction, which is already high in the area with presence of railway line and air traffic route.

Increased fire hazard/ risk of other accidents.

H-235
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Induced current on railway lines with close proximity/ corona effect- CEQA report did not clearly address this for a 115KV line.

Economic effect on the community from small to larger scale based on all of the above.

Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/
This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health. https://www.epa.gov/radtown/electric-and-magnetic-fields-power-lines This resource suggests taking precautions and keeping distance or limiting exposure. Residents would no longer have either of these two options per the current proposals if they are living there 24-7.

https://www.fastexpert.com/blog/should-i-buy-a-house-near-power-lines/ These are points of view from a real estate expert who clearly states that property value declines proportionately to the distance of the property from high tension lines. People have apprehensions whether or not research clearly defines the risk. Potential buyers might have low priority for a property too close to a high tension power line.
https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

H-236
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: vijay srinivasan <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 10:46 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; NRS-KRS Project
Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would H-237
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

6. ⁠What happens when electrification of rail lines happens- as this is already planned for the future? Have you potentially considered the cumulative EMF effect in coexistence of the high power lines and with railway lines’ electrification? Will the EMF values not be much higher then? H-238
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the H-239
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-240
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
And this is what is included on the report:

Thanks
Vijay Srinivasan
H-241
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Concerned Santa Clara resident
1881 Garzoni place
Santa Clara

Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

H-242
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Lini Kuriyan <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 10:14 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would H-243
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

6. ⁠What happens when electrification of rail lines happens- as this is already planned for the future? Have you potentially considered the cumulative EMF effect in coexistence of the high power lines and with railway lines’ electrification? Will the EMF values not be much higher then? H-244
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the H-245
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-246
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
And this is what is included on the report:

H-247
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

Lini Kuriyan
4479 Moulin Pl, Santa Clara - 95054
408 368 9436
Mission Gardens

H-248
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Olivier Madec <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2024 9:42 PM
To: NRS-KRS Project
Cc: O M
Subject: NRS-KRS
Attachments: Capture.JPG

To Whom it may concern,

My name is Olivier Madec, I am a Santa Clara resident and property owner for more than 12 years.

I am sending an email, since it seems that my comments from the first public meeting were not recorded.

I am against this project for the following reasons:

1. Health reasons, the magnetic fields from the power lines are not negligible.

2. High voltage lines are dangerous, see attached a picture I took earlier this month (8/1/24) of a fire after the transformer blew up on Agnew road in the new datacenter with new electrical lines. The proposed location has already an existing gas line underground and the train track is very close by.

The public scoping report in " 3. SUMMARY OF SCOPING COMMENTS " states: "The proposed Project route was chosen because, among other reasons, it had fewer impacts" I don't think that routing the line close to a gas line or train track should be taken lightly.

3. The aesthetics, power lines are ugly and a 15 foot wall and small trees cannot hide them. The wall from the MDN pdf page 49, Figure 5.1-2. Wall Separating Residences and Lafayette Street. Doesn't exist between the residences on Bassett street and Lafayette street.

4. A consequence of points 1, 2 and 3, is the loss of property values.

The subject of SVP electrical production being at capacity was raised during a planning commission meeting by a new commissioner during a data center permit review, but the permit has been approved anyway. This project was presented to the city council as fulfilling commitments already approved by the city and other options are not doable. Why put Santa Clara residents in such a position?

The route going through industrial areas and next to the creek is a better option as it's not next to residential areas.

Sincerely,
Olivier Madec

H-249
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Suneet Bisht <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 10:02 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would H-250
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

Reference #3

Page 174 ends

H-251
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

Reference #4: Post meeting material from March 19th
2024 @https://santaclara.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6582415&GUID=E6E14646-3CF7- 4D15-BB98-F18580696012&Options=&Search=
Personal observation#4: At surface level, it looks like Option #A was selected only based on Cost perspective, without any consideration to human health, young children, property values, Corona effect, long term sustainability perspective or any other factors. While its important to understand the results of CEQA study, its extremely critical to understand the negative impact of EMF on the many young children living around the proposed transmission lines. Without extensive research and study on the impact to young children and adult heath, we should not be approving such an incomplete proposal.

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-252
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

And this is what is included on the report:

The Mission Garden Townhome community has no walls as such and the main entry to residences face the road directly and are the most impacted. There are several other single family homes on Lafayette H-253
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
street with the same impact, having an entryway directly on the street. This and including other citations of reusing sections of older reports, is all in all absolutely unacceptable and instills distrust. This further shows incompetency of the agency/ agencies preparing this report.

Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

H-254
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity

Thank you for your consideration,

Suneet Bisht

H-255
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: MANJUNATH JAGANNATHARAO <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 10:02 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Fw: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Projection in

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would H-256
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

6. ⁠What happens when electrification of rail lines happens- as this is already planned for the future? Have you potentially considered the cumulative EMF effect in coexistence of the high power lines and with railway lines’ electrification? Will the EMF values not be much higher then? H-257
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

H-258
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

And this is what is included on the report:

Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

3. https://www.fastexpert.com/blog/should-i-buy-a-house-near-power-lines/ These are points of view from a real estate expert who clearly states that property value declines proportionately to the distance of the property from high tension lines. People have H-259
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
apprehensions whether or not research clearly defines the risk. Potential buyers might have low priority for a property too close to a high tension power line.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

H-260
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

H-261
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Phani Shankar Pandravada <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 9:54 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

H-262
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
https://psc.wi.gov/Documents/Brochures/EMF.pdf

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Personal observation#3
The railway line's proximity to the proposed high transmission lines is very concerning. The centerline distance from proposed lines to railway line is aproximately 50 feet per google maps with some margin for H-263
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
error. As per the report there are no Corona rings proposed for the 115KV lines. There seems to be negligence in design in consideration of the hazards posed by these high voltage lines as Corona effect can transfer current to railway lines. All the residents are at a high risk of accidental hazards given the proximity of the railway line, this project is adding on to the hazards. This section is only stating information about what Corona effect is, as may be required by law, which by the way is again a copy paste from an old report. The only concern discussed in more depth is the audible noise level. The concerns are presented to imply that this is not significant by stating that 115KV lines pose less than significant risk.

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-264
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

And this is what is included on the report:

H-265
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Conclusion: This project's initial study needs to expand beyond CEQA for approval from the public. The limited scope of CEQA has failed to address the following concerns we have:
• Health hazards due to EMF levels.- This is by far the gravest concern and CEQA is clearly not qualified to study that.
• Reduced property values- several references provided below. • Loss of Aesthetic appeal for potential real estate buyers/ new and current businesses. • Increase in audible noise levels during and post construction, which is already high in the area with presence of railway line and air traffic route.
• Increased fire hazard/ risk of other accidents.
• Induced current on railway lines with close proximity/ corona effect- CEQA report did not clearly address this for a 115KV line.
• Economic effect on the community from small to larger scale based on all of the above.

Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

H-266
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Harini Tadinada <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 9:52 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would H-267
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

6. ⁠What happens when electrification of rail lines happens- as this is already planned for the future? Have you potentially considered the cumulative EMF effect in coexistence of the high power lines and with railway lines’ electrification? Will the EMF values not be much higher then? H-268
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the H-269
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-270
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
And this is what is included on the report:

H-271
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

H-272
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Shankar Pandravada <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 9:47 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; Mayor and Council; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would H-273
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

6. ⁠What happens when electrification of rail lines happens- as this is already planned for the future? Have you potentially considered the cumulative EMF effect in coexistence of the high power lines and with railway lines’ electrification? Will the EMF values not be much higher then? H-274
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the H-275
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-276
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
And this is what is included on the report:

Additional References:

H-277
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

Thank you for your kind attention regarding this matter. Apologies for the rather long email, we as residents had to gather our collective thoughts and send this to you to bring to your attention our concerns. We really hope all of you will look into this and continue working with the residents to find a win-win solution.

Shankar.

H-278
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Vishaka Sutrave <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 9:24 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

H-279
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
https://psc.wi.gov/Documents/Brochures/EMF.pdf
There are not enough references listed in the draft report provided to us, and the explanation provided seems to be conveniently using studies that prove otherwise. This needs more investigation and references. The solution provided as raising the height of the poles and increasing the distance is non- existent. It was confirmed during the in person meeting that the design will not be altered and the height was already designed as required according to the SVP team present there. It seems that the preparers of this report did not even read the report after copying pasting from the old report as evident in the list of proposed solutions is not applicable here.

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Personal observation#3
The railway line's proximity to the proposed high transmission lines is very concerning. The centerline distance from proposed lines to railway line is aproximately 50 feet per google maps with some margin for error. As per the report there are no Corona rings proposed for the 115KV lines. There seems to be H-280
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
negligence in design in consideration of the hazards posed by these high voltage lines as Corona effect can transfer current to railway lines. All the residents are at a high risk of accidental hazards given the proximity of the railway line, this project is adding on to the hazards. This section is only stating information about what Corona effect is, as may be required by law, which by the way is again a copy paste from an old report. The only concern discussed in more depth is the audible noise level. The concerns are presented to imply that this is not significant by stating that 115KV lines pose less than significant risk.

Reference #4: Post meeting material from March 19th
2024 @https://santaclara.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6582415&GUID=E6E14646-3CF7- 4D15-BB98-F18580696012&Options=&Search=
Personal observation#4: At surface level, it looks like Option #A was selected only based on Cost perspective, without any consideration to human health, young children, property values, Corona effect, long term sustainability perspective or any other factors. While its important to understand the results of CEQA study, its extremely critical to understand the negative impact of EMF on the many young children living around the proposed transmission lines. Without extensive research and study on the impact to young children and adult heath, we should not be approving such an incomplete proposal.

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-281
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

And this is what is included on the report:

The Mission Garden Townhome community has no walls as such and the main entry to residences face the road directly and are the most impacted. There are several other single family homes on Lafayette street with the same impact, having an entryway directly on the street. This and including other citations H-282
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
of reusing sections of older reports, is all in all absolutely unacceptable and instills distrust. This further shows incompetency of the agency/ agencies preparing this report.

Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

Regards
Vishaka Sutrave

H-283
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Jerin <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 9:12 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

H-284
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Regarding EMF concerns for human health, there are plenty of scientific studies that do indicate the grave concern on human health with EMF exposures and we cannot ignore this aspect. Here is a reference to an article and there are plenty of articles listed here under references:
https://psc.wi.gov/Documents/Brochures/EMF.pdf

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

6. ⁠What happens when electrification of rail lines happens- as this is already planned for the future? Have you potentially considered the cumulative EMF effect in coexistence of the high power lines and with railway lines’ electrification? Will the EMF values not be much higher then? H-285
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the H-286
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-287
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
And this is what is included on the report:

Conclusion: This project's initial study needs to expand beyond CEQA for approval from the public. The limited scope of CEQA has failed to address the following concerns we have:
• Health hazards due to EMF levels.- This is by far the gravest concern and CEQA is clearly not qualified to study that.
• Reduced property values- several references provided below. • Loss of Aesthetic appeal for potential real estate buyers/ new and current businesses. • Increase in audible noise levels during and post construction, which is already high in the area with presence of railway line and air traffic route. • Increased fire hazard/ risk of other accidents.
• Induced current on railway lines with close proximity/ corona effect- CEQA report did not clearly address this for a 115KV line.
• Economic effect on the community from small to larger scale based on all of the above.

H-288
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

H-289
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Punnya Cipson <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 8:32 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

H-290
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Regarding EMF concerns for human health, there are plenty of scientific studies that do indicate the grave concern on human health with EMF exposures and we cannot ignore this aspect. Here is a reference to an article and there are plenty of articles listed here under references:
https://psc.wi.gov/Documents/Brochures/EMF.pdf

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet. These are available on Page 2 & Page 3 of this report: https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/departments-and- agencies/dph/dph/environmental_health/eoha/pdf/emffactsheet2008pdf.pdf This report has citations from WHO , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and California Department of Health Services.
https://www.niehs.nih.gov/sites/default/files/health/materials/electric_and_magnetic_fields_associ ated_with_the_use_of_electric_power_questions_and_answers_english_508.pdf Some other questions around the EMF study map shared during presentation on Aug 22 2024:

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?
H-291
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

H-292
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

And this is what is included on the report:

H-293
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

Conclusion: This project's initial study needs to expand beyond CEQA for approval from the public. The limited scope of CEQA has failed to address the following concerns we have:
• Health hazards due to EMF levels.- This is by far the gravest concern and CEQA is clearly not qualified to study that.
• Reduced property values- several references provided below. • Loss of Aesthetic appeal for potential real estate buyers/ new and current businesses. • Increase in audible noise levels during and post construction, which is already high in the area with presence of railway line and air traffic route. • Increased fire hazard/ risk of other accidents.
• Induced current on railway lines with close proximity/ corona effect- CEQA report did not clearly address this for a 115KV line.
• Economic effect on the community from small to larger scale based on all of the above.

Additional References:

H-294
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

As a resident in this area, I strongly oppose this proposal (Route A), to build High Power Electric Wire Poles near the dwelling

Thanks
Punnya Ann Joy
2142 Payne Pl,
Santa Clara

H-295
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Manali Desai <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 8:31 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

H-296
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Regarding EMF concerns for human health, there are plenty of scientific studies that do indicate the grave concern on human health with EMF exposures and we cannot ignore this aspect. Here is a reference to an article and there are plenty of articles listed here under references:
https://psc.wi.gov/Documents/Brochures/EMF.pdf

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

6. ⁠What happens when electrification of rail lines happens- as this is already planned for the future? Have you potentially considered the cumulative EMF effect in coexistence of the high power lines and with railway lines’ electrification? Will the EMF values not be much higher then? H-297
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the H-298
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-299
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
And this is what is included on the report:

Conclusion: This project's initial study needs to expand beyond CEQA for approval from the public. The limited scope of CEQA has failed to address the following concerns we have:
• Health hazards due to EMF levels.- This is by far the gravest concern and CEQA is clearly not qualified to study that.
• Reduced property values- several references provided below. • Loss of Aesthetic appeal for potential real estate buyers/ new and current businesses. • Increase in audible noise levels during and post construction, which is already high in the area with presence of railway line and air traffic route. • Increased fire hazard/ risk of other accidents.
• Induced current on railway lines with close proximity/ corona effect- CEQA report did not clearly address this for a 115KV line.
• Economic effect on the community from small to larger scale based on all of the above.

H-300
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

H-301
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: SriVidya Chavali <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 8:27 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

H-302
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Regarding EMF concerns for human health, there are plenty of scientific studies that do indicate the grave concern on human health with EMF exposures and we cannot ignore this aspect. Here is a reference to an article and there are plenty of articles listed here under references:
https://psc.wi.gov/Documents/Brochures/EMF.pdf

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. â Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. â What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. â Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

6. â What happens when electrification of rail lines happens- as this is already planned for the future? Have you potentially considered the cumulative EMF effect in coexistence of the high power lines and with railway lines’ electrification? Will the EMF values not be much higher then?

7. â Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?
H-303
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

8. â Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. â Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. â what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-304
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Personal observation#5: The picture is taken conveniently from the other side of the railway line which is actually Kingsbury street, inside a private community and not Lafayette street. This is further away from the proposed SVP lines. This is very misleading; see snapshots taken from Google maps below

And this is what is included on the report:

Conclusion: This project's initial study needs to expand beyond CEQA for approval from the public. The limited scope of CEQA has failed to address the following concerns we have:
• Health hazards due to EMF levels.- This is by far the gravest concern and CEQA is clearly not qualified to study that.
• Reduced property values- several references provided below. • Loss of Aesthetic appeal for potential real estate buyers/ new and current businesses. • Increase in audible noise levels during and post construction, which is already high in the area with presence of railway line and air traffic route. • Increased fire hazard/ risk of other accidents.
• Induced current on railway lines with close proximity/ corona effect- CEQA report did not clearly address this for a 115KV line.
• Economic effect on the community from small to larger scale based on all of the above.

Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

3. https://www.fastexpert.com/blog/should-i-buy-a-house-near-power-lines/ These are points of view from a real estate expert who clearly states that property value declines proportionately to the distance of the property from high tension lines. People have H-305
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
apprehensions whether or not research clearly defines the risk. Potential buyers might have low priority for a property too close to a high tension power line.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

H-306
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

H-307
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Hima Sree MC <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 8:05 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

H-308
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Regarding EMF concerns for human health, there are plenty of scientific studies that do indicate the grave concern on human health with EMF exposures and we cannot ignore this aspect. Here is a reference to an article and there are plenty of articles listed here under references:
https://psc.wi.gov/Documents/Brochures/EMF.pdf

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

6. ⁠What happens when electrification of rail lines happens- as this is already planned for the future? Have you potentially considered the cumulative EMF effect in coexistence of the high power lines and with railway lines’ electrification? Will the EMF values not be much higher then? H-309
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the H-310
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-311
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

H-312
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
We demand further investigation and revisit other routes or proposals to resolve the power needs of the city. We have to ensure our and our kids’ health is not at stake in the name of development and infrastructure and are not in agreement for this project to move forward. We cannot approve this to move forward as of now given the lack of study and absence of a satisfactory solution/ mitigation provided in favor/ assurance to public health.

Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity.

:-P Smile.....And the world smiles with you :-P

H-313
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Lakshmikanth Chowdary Pothula <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 7:12 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

Regarding EMF concerns for human health, there are plenty of scientific studies that do indicate the grave concern on human health with EMF exposures and we cannot ignore this aspect. Here is a reference to an article and there are plenty of articles listed here under references:
https://psc.wi.gov/Documents/Brochures/EMF.pdf
H-314
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
There are not enough references listed in the draft report provided to us, and the explanation provided seems to be conveniently using studies that prove otherwise. This needs more investigation and references. The solution provided as raising the height of the poles and increasing the distance is non- existent. It was confirmed during the in person meeting that the design will not be altered and the height was already designed as required according to the SVP team present there. It seems that the preparers of this report did not even read the report after copying pasting from the old report as evident in the list of proposed solutions is not applicable here.

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Personal observation#3
The railway line's proximity to the proposed high transmission lines is very concerning. The centerline distance from proposed lines to railway line is aproximately 50 feet per google maps with some margin for error. As per the report there are no Corona rings proposed for the 115KV lines. There seems to be negligence in design in consideration of the hazards posed by these high voltage lines as Corona effect H-315
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
can transfer current to railway lines. All the residents are at a high risk of accidental hazards given the proximity of the railway line, this project is adding on to the hazards. This section is only stating information about what Corona effect is, as may be required by law, which by the way is again a copy paste from an old report. The only concern discussed in more depth is the audible noise level. The concerns are presented to imply that this is not significant by stating that 115KV lines pose less than significant risk.

Reference #4: Post meeting material from March 19th
2024 @https://santaclara.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6582415&GUID=E6E14646-3CF7- 4D15-BB98-F18580696012&Options=&Search=
Personal observation#4: At surface level, it looks like Option #A was selected only based on Cost perspective, without any consideration to human health, young children, property values, Corona effect, long term sustainability perspective or any other factors. While its important to understand the results of CEQA study, its extremely critical to understand the negative impact of EMF on the many young children living around the proposed transmission lines. Without extensive research and study on the impact to young children and adult heath, we should not be approving such an incomplete proposal.

Page 6 ends

discussions with several real estate agents in the region, I have unanimously found all to agree that the real estate values of residences in close proximity to power lines goes down. Its hard to find potential buyers and most folks refrain from buying a house too close to high power transmission lines. There are 1000 plus residences in the area affected by this project. Even if we were to make very rough assumptions, and assume minimal cost reduction in property values and take an average loss of $100,000 per property in the current year, that goes to $100,000,000 of loss of equity to the public. This is not even accounting the businesses affected by this project. This long explanation was to raise a point that if the selection of route A was saving money to the city, this is costing a huge financial loss to the public, which is not acceptable. This decrease in property values will also directly impact the tax collection by the Santa Clara Assessor and result in lower tax revenue coming into the city of Santa Clara.

Reference #5 : Page 49 of report- Figure 5.1-2. Wall separating residences and Lafayette Street.

H-316
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

And this is what is included on the report:

Conclusion: This project's initial study needs to expand beyond CEQA for approval from the public. The limited scope of CEQA has failed to address the following concerns we have:
• Health hazards due to EMF levels.- This is by far the gravest concern and CEQA is clearly not qualified to study that.
• Reduced property values- several references provided below. • Loss of Aesthetic appeal for potential real estate buyers/ new and current businesses. • Increase in audible noise levels during and post construction, which is already high in the area with presence of railway line and air traffic route. • Increased fire hazard/ risk of other accidents.
• Induced current on railway lines with close proximity/ corona effect- CEQA report did not clearly address this for a 115KV line.
• Economic effect on the community from small to larger scale based on all of the above.

We demand further investigation and revisit other routes or proposals to resolve the power needs of the city. We have to ensure our and our kids’ health is not at stake in the name of development and H-317
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
infrastructure and are not in agreement for this project to move forward. We cannot approve this to move forward as of now given the lack of study and absence of a satisfactory solution/ mitigation provided in favor/ assurance to public health.

Additional References:

Research on effects of EMF on humans:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ This research reinforces the concerns of EMF exposure effect on human health.

4. https://orchard.com/blog/posts/power-lines-and-property-value Another research on real estate values lowered due to high tension power lines proximity

H-318
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
Email: NRS-KRS 115 kV T-Line

From: Sith Thuon <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2024 10:36 PM
To: NRS-KRS Project; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)- NRS-KRS 115kV Transmission Line Project

Reference #2: Page 41 of report- Section 4.15. Electric and Magnetic Fields summary.

The EMP map shared during the in person meeting had several flaws and we would like to question the viability of the study that was completed. What time of the day was the study completed and on what models were the values based on since these were done on assumption for the EMF values that would H-319
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND
be there once the project is complete. Since we have seen the several sections of the report redundantly copied over from other reports, we would like a more detailed analysis of this report.

They also call out that most impacts of EMF from high voltage lines dissipate at ~300 feet.

1. Have you conducted an existing EMF study to identify the current value of the community ?

2. Are your emf study values based on the cumulative, or interference of existing emf and potential emf.

3. ⁠Emf value was calculated based on existing studies. What was the delta between mathematical modeling and actual values ( from existing structures).

4. ⁠What is the delta between underground and overhead structures’ emf values?

5. ⁠Can you provide the same for Route options B and C?

6. ⁠What happens when electrification of rail lines happens- as this is already planned for the future? Have you potentially considered the cumulative EMF effect in coexistence of the high power lines and with railway lines’ electrification? Will the EMF values not be much higher then? H-320
NRS-KRS 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 2024 FINAL IS/MND

7. ⁠Can you share the mathematical modeling maps of Emf for 115k, 230k and the next two higher values of the power line ?

8. ⁠Can you share Emf maps from existing structures of 115k, 230 k and the next 2 higher values of the power line?

9. ⁠Please share any emf related information that you have especially if it contains assumptions for any calculations so we can understand the effects of current project and future projects.

11. ⁠what is the proposed power consumption of 95054 zip code for the next 5, 10 and 15 years in the master plan ?
Reference #3

Page 174 ends

Page 6 ends

City Council and Authorities ConcurrentNovember 12, 2024

City Council and Authorities Concurrent
November 12, 2024