Neighborhood Petitions — City Council and Authorities Concurrent, February 25, 2025

Neighborhood Residents : (Pomeroy Green, Humbolt, Benton, Mora ga, O.rtbello, Santa Clara)
AT&T Tower Relocation Group
Feb 13th 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Ctiara City Council Subject :Signed Petitions Opposing the AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Supporting the Appea l (PLN25-00029)
Dear Honorable Council Members and Mayor,
We hereby submit signed petitions from neighborhood residents within a 1, 000-foot radius of the proposed AT&T tower, expressing their support for rejecting this proposal and relocating the tower elsewhere. The submission includes the following:
• Total residents who signed physical petitions : 58
• Number of pages submitted : 32
• Unique home address es: 34
Please include these 32 signed petitions for review in the Feb 25th council meeting. We are working on a parallel change.erg online petition; we will submit lhis next week.

Sincerely,
AT&T Tower Relo cation Group
58 Residents-Signed Letters Attached
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Counci l Appeal: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to appeal (PLN25-00029) for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additiona l review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values. Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($BM in one scenario) for homeowners , impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition. Ripon schools decommissioned towers due to cancer clusters. Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents .

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum .

Sincerely,
V · v--.-~(' eJ\'"·
c v I CAl\/€St1 v,v eK ~fl J f\)
/VA~
{ A "" r vl-h °' '1>vl o-\1\o.. llv f(\Ci ( )

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address:
"s,ot:6
> p,. "i- 1 f\ C.. l t:\6\ 1\
n 0 M \k)<...1 A.,_, ~
c ft ~So~\
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appeal : Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropr iate locat ions. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to appeal (PLN25-00029) for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of lowers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities .

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues . This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children , from radio frequency radition. Ripon schools decommissioned towers due to cancer clusters. Santa Clara High is within 300ft ; this location wou ld also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly .

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locatio ns proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way , Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carm ichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our adde ndum .

Sincerely,
~'.0,-"""- ""'""""--~
~0.-:S::,~u~'-i 1',l\C)~~'-'1\v~

1.(Signature)/( Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address: 2-°'-'-" \ ':)tt."'-'""c:;~ s;.~-~"
✓
~ c...~£½."- ' Ct-, ~SDS \
Neighborhood Residen ts (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject : City Council Appeal : Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23 -00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members ,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to appeal (PLN25-000 29) for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values. Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overloo ked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Location s:We urge you to direct Ali&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmic hael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum.

Sincerely,
\
~\. .. :~ 21,\~",a \-100\('/\Q.._

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name)
Address:
'10 S S ov~'\Q \ \o ;.;::ru;\ __,

3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name)
/
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appeal: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to appeal (PLN25 -00029) for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore , detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area might, need additional review from authorities .

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values. Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners , i'mpacting city tax revenues . This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition . Ripon schools decommiss ioned towers due to cancer clusters . Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents .

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercia l property.

These are in our addendum.

Sincerely,
,

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)I (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature) /(Name) Address :

Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appeal : Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23 -00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urg;e you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply conce rned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to appeal (PLN25-00029} for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. A esthetic Con cerns : The towers will be an eyesore , detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mightx need additional review from authorities.

3. Prop erty Value Los s: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church .

4. Health Concerns : We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition . Ripon schools decommissioned towe rs due to cancer clusters . Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents , seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents .

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichae l Park, and a comme rcial property.

These are in our addendum.

Sincerely,

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address: '37-{f ~~(.{, /ht,
~
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject : City Council Appeal : Reject AT&T Cell Tower Propo sal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00 148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members ,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to appeal (PLN25-00029) for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesth etic Concerns : The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($BM in one scenario) for homeowners , impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition. Ripon schools decommissio n,ed towers due to cancer clusters. Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents .

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercia l property.

These are in our addendum.

Sincerely,
g. A i u:l "°'
cc;Q,~,-.-~
(..1} R v N ,, Br'\· LA I<~ I ~ H 1v r1 RA-jrJ)
C YKJ\ ~ OR.t'\ '\\I\_ <.K \\ 3. ~)

1.(Signature)/(Name)
Address :

2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Slgnature)/(Name) ~ ~ ) \\ 0 '\'-"-. ~ tl .L \ \\ \.J (::
~~~, ~ C..U,~
Neigh borhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group )
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appeal : Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street {PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members ,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to appeal (PLN25-00029) for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood . The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities .

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values. Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, innpacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition. Ripon schools decommiss ioned towers due to cancer clusters. Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequ ate Alternativ es: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations: We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichae l Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum.

Si•?~vf J;,r-e,- , [jane ff e T•r a__]

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Slg nature) / {Name) 3.(Signatur e)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address:
\
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appeal : Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23 -00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN2 5-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents. urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street , and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to appeal (PLN25-00029} for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pome roy Green area mighty need additiona l review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values. Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition. Ripon schoo ls decommissioned towers due to cancer clusters . Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents .

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercia l property.

These are in our addendum .

Sincer~ly, ,,./' ,,uJ ~ & ~ CJ - J O I ~ O 'S"" (c,j
/) ~ cl- ~
70 h vo a °' " c. 1'c....

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address:

Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council ·15
Subject: City Council Appeal Feb~. 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents , urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations . We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers :

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neig_hborhood. The Historic Pome roy Green area might:, need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition . Ripon schools decommissioned towers due to cancer clusters. Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers .

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents , seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way , Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum .

Slncerely,
~,fA \J\A -~~¼.,"w\ . .
~ if . :~

1.(Signatur (Na ' ) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4,(Signature)/(Name) Address :'"'2:oSG:,-t''(tA ivt \3.,()L.\ k\Jf;
~~~ ~
6\"S> 0 s \
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appeal Feb "lrt-, 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Ciara residents , urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore , detracting from the neighborhood . The Historic Pomeroy Green area might:, need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values. Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church .

4. Health Concerns: We're conce rned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition. Ripon schools decommissioned towers due to cance r clusters . Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenie nce at expense of residents .

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of -way, Earl Carmichae l Park, and a commercial prope rty.

These are in our addendum .

Sincerely,

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address ~D ttu.M.e,o_:r .f!,.'\JC
{Yj,ry~~ J1R(7~o
.JUD'-/ Z.il Nf>O
!fu1·.~~v~ .JM4r
ff.l.l~!Sf M f<.. '7.d/1(30
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appeal Feb~. 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore- more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners , impacting city tax revenues . This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Concerns : We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition. Ripon schools decommissioned towers due to cancer clusters. Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives : AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents .

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore : City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum.

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address :
,2 <11 t. I-/ f-/ m 8 o J-1
0/9/L) 74 C--IJ:t/2--R/
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council 1-b
Subject : City Council Appeal Feb t'I-, 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN2 3-00148 ) and Support A ddendum to Appeal (PLN2 5-00029 ) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estima tes multi-millio n dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners , impacting city tax revenues . This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and :spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternative s: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents , seeming ly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Location s:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a comme rcial property.

These are in our addendum.

Sincerely, .3L:SL \-\'-"-"\,"\\ ~""' - SC
0 L_Q\l~ ~ ... ~Ir- - ~~ ~-h,'-
z) ~ .

1.(Signature)/(Name)
Address:
~
4)~
Lee. ~e .nhV\

2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature) /(Name) Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Reloc::ation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appeal Feb~ 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029 ) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents , urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesti rng rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood . The Histo ric Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities .

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition . Ripon schools decommissio ned towers due to cancer clusters . Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents , seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents .

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-o f-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Cann ichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum .

Sincerely,

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address :
1f-::t._~t-, fv~
1/ .... 2 q1 I « ... ,A, H 4 "·i
-,$i,1.,-{ n c lu" '\ CA I
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group )
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appeal Feb~. 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support .Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Coun cil Members,
We, the undersign ed Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers :

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need addrtional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss : Cell towers lower values. Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition. Ripon schoo ls decommissioned towers due to cancer clusters. Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents .

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichae l Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum.

Sincerely, )
( pc.< ,r<,ll
l<-~.ea

2.(Signature)/ (Name)
Address :
s I OD f/-v ,.,,bofl- ~v.e
( ~;~ &i(AA.1,7,<.)

3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name)
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council '2S
Subject: City Council Appeal Feb M, 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23 -00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers :

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore , detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pome roy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities .

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners , impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition . Ripon schoo ls decommiss ioned towers due to cancer clusters . Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

S. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives : AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents .

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum.

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address :

Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council 2-5
Subject: City Council Appeal Feb tt, 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Councll Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents , urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers :

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore , detracting from the neighborhood . The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values. Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues . This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church .

4. HeaHh Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition. Ripon schools decommissioned towers due to cancer clusters. Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers .

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents , seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way , Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commerc ial property.

These are in our addendum .

Slncerely,

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address: 2Cl52 r\1AMb1;l-t Ave. ~¾. C,.\,.,,e--, c_t:,.. C\'So~\ • Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appeal Feb~ 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029 ) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values. Our addendum estimates multi-millio n dollar losses ($BM in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church .

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition. Ripon schools decommiss iorned towers due to cance r clusters. Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents .

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public light-of -way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum .

Sincerely,
~ ~<°:J-Y-f''_(?-:,~\l.v) l, \J ~

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature )/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature )/(Name) Address : ._ .._., 1. \\""'e.,q "~E.
~ ~,l,p,
/
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council "l-6
Subject: City Council Appeal Feb 1't, 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents , urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street , and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations . We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers :

1. Proximity & Code Violation: The proposed ,cell tower violates the spirit of the city's new 300-foot setback rule and is an irresponsible placement by common sense interpretation . Many cities, like Los Altos, Fremont , and Beverly Hills, require 500-1000 feet from homes,

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore , detracting from the neighborhood . The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities .

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($SM in one scenario) for homeowners , impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especiaUy for children, from radio frequency radition . Ripon schools decommissioned towers due to cancer clusters . Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location wou ld also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: .City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum .

Sincerely,
~~5-lJ, Cr1tusH1 ''-- sr111H)

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address ~ c<¥ (~ HU/Vl80l -r 14 ve
;;;.,{,<,\ tq Cf;vv-4. 1 ~ t SO)- I
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council -,.5,
Subject: City Council Appeal Feb tt, 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members ,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more c1ppropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers :

2. Aesthetic Concerns : The towers will be an eyesore , detract ing from the neighborhood . The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities .

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Concerns : We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition. Ripon schools decommissiorned towers due to cancer clusters . Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers .

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations :We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore : City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commerc ial property.

These are in our addendum .

Sincerely,

3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature )/(Name)
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appeal Feb~. 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members ,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

1. Proximity & Code Violation : The proposed oell tower violates the spirit of the city's new 300-foot setback rule and is an irresponsible placement by common sense interpretation. Many cities, like Los Altos, Fremont, and Beverty Hills, require 500-1000 feet from homes,

2. Aestheti c Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorit ies.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dolla r losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church .

4. Health Concerns : We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition . Ripon schools decommissioned towers due to cancer clusters. Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternative s: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations :We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum .

Sincerely , --.

1.(Slgnature) /(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name)
3;1d\)~Wt ~~n11-l (f

3.(Slgnature) /(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name)
1~{~~t_,__ elJt°'~fd
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council "2$
Subject: City Council Appeal Feb tt, 2025 : Reject AT&T Cell Tower Propo sal at 3111 Bento n Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood . The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impact ing city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addend um.

Sincerely,

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address:

Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Towe r Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Membe rs of the Santa Clara City Council ~
Subject: City Council Appeal Feb 1-t, 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members ,
We, the undersig ned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for request ing rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Con cerns : The towers will be an ,eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Los s: Cell towers lower values. Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($SM in one scenario) for homeowners , impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations :We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum.

Sincerely,

1.(Signature)/(Nam e) 2.(Signature) / (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address :

Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb202 5
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council -zS
Subject: City Council Appeal Feb 1't-; 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-0002g ) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesti ng rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values. Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowne rs, impact ing city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Con cerns: We're conce rned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition. Ripon schools decommiss ioned towers due to cancer clusters. Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this locatio n would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate A.lternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosi ng the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercia l property.

These are in our addend um.

Sincerely,
-\
W,,,,.,- Jo5"'- (o<ivC,--v(

1.(S1gnature)/{fiame) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Sign~ture)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address : 1 1 /
_stol- rJCXV\..\/0 - f/v~
Neighbo rhood Residents {AT&T Tower Relocati on Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Membe rs of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appe al Feb ~ , 2025 : Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23 -00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal {PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropria te locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities .

3. Property Value Loss : Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses {$8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations: We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmic hael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum.

Sincerely,
-:s-Cl.,V\. 0 \ , I /

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ {Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/{Name) Address :

Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council -,_s
Subject: City Council Appeal Feb 11, 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members ,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents , urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

1. Proximity & Code Violation : The proposed cell tower violates the spirit of the city's new 300-foot setback rule and is an irresponsible placem ent by common sense interpretation . Many cities, like Los Altos, Fremont, and Beverly Hills, require 500-1 000 feet from homes, i. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area might:, need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss : Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estima tes multi-million dollar losses ($BM in one scenario) for homeowners , impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church .

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children , from radio frequency radition. Ripon schoo ls decommissioned towers due to cance r clusters . Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and .spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives : AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemi ngly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations :We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore : City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of -way, Earl Cannichael Park, and a commercia l property.

These are in our addendum .

Sincerely,
~
g ev t:, CVV"'"\ 'S, •I j),~
,:3 I 7 0 .\--t v yvi 13° l 1 ~ tJ -e.._

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address:

Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appeal Feb~. 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street (PLN23-00148) and Support Addendum to Appeal (PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorit ies.

3. Property Value Loss : Cell towers lower values . Our addend um estimates multi-million dollar losses ($SM in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations :We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum.

Sincerely, //J-1.. k,l!f-· - -V,,11111,1.... .1Az,)1,t,r..5 ~~ ~~>

1.(Signature)/(Name) 2.(Signature)/ (Name) 3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/(Name) Address: .$1"60 I-I"'-""-bo\\- Ave.., '>'-'-~ ... 'i:'-"' CA 9S-oS-l }J'(O //i,,I>' &,If A-t1e x,.leo- C wr'a.- Cl+ 'i5'o >I Neighborhood Res idents {AT&T Tower Relo cation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council Subject: City Council Appeal Feb~. 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street {PLN23-0014 8) and Support Addendum to Appeal {PLN25-00029) Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 31 11 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locatio ns. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full detai ls. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:

1. Proximity/& Code Violation: The proposed cell tower violates the spirit of the city's new 300-foot setback rule and is an irresponsible placement by common sense interpretation. Many cities, like Los Altos, Fremont, and Beverly Hills. require 500-1000 feet from homes,

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyeso re, detracting from the neighborhood . The Historic Pomeroy Green area might)' need additional review from authorities .

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-millio n dollar losses ($SM in one scenario) for homeowners, impacti ng city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about healt h risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition . Ripon schools decomm issioned towers due to cancer clusters . Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locatio ns proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum .

This project burdens our community. Prioritize resident well being over financial gains for AT&T/church. We urge rejection of the 3111 Benton St cell tower and relocate ii elsewhere more compat ible. See addendum for full details.

Sincerely,
J:~l,j & ~

1.{Sldj7~; 2.(Signature)/ (Name)
Address:

3.(Signature)/(Name) 4.(Signature)/{Name)
1 1 7 () r1 t,,VY>1,bP //; A ti~ , s ~-t,,_ . C/µt{,
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council 1S
Subject: City Council Appeal FebK, 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 _,; Benton Street and Support Adde~dum to Appeal I;, L tJ J. 5" - C> O o -:2 9 Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:
"-- 1. Proximity & Code Violation: -The proposed cell tower violates the spirit of the city's new 300-foot setback rule and is an irresponsible placement by common sense interpretation . Many cities, like Los Altos, Fremont, and Beverly Hills, require 500-1000 feet from homes,

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood . The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities .

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church .

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way , Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commerc ial property .

These are in our addendum .

This project burdens our community . Prioritize resident well being over financial gains for AT&T/church. We urge rejection of the 3111 Benton St cell tower and relocate it elsewhere more compatible . See addendum for full details .
/V; c.. MO (a.s R c ~~! 10
1 1 I -PoM 1=.1Q c, 'I _n ~l
- - . ' -v., tJ<u r p.~r st ... 00!11 i 1 t11 Jt (itN It /Es-- Ru..s'->i 10~1 h J,ft (Signature) (Printed Name) (Address)
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council ----- g_ 'i
Subject: City Council Appeal Feb~ 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street and Support Addendum to Appeal p L t./ ;J. 5"' ·-O O CJ ?, 'l Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations. We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:
f... 1. Proximity & Code Violation : The proposed cell tower violates the spirit of the city's new 300-foot setback rule and is an irresponsible placement by common sense interpretation. Many cities, like Los Altos, Fremont, and Beverly Hills, require 500-1000 feet from homes,

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyeso re, detracting from the neighborhood . The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners , impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church .

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives : AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Eart Carmichael Park, and a comme rcial property .

These are in our addendum .

Sincerely,
(Signa.ture) (Printed Name) (Address)
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council JS
Subject: City Cou ncil Appeal Feb .tt", 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street and Support Addend um to Appeal p L,N~ S - {l O O ~ Cf Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations . We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:
f... 1. Proximity & Code Violatio n: The proposed cell tower violates the spirit of the city's new 300-foot setback rule and is an irresponsible placement by common sense interpretation. Many cities, like Los Altos, Fremont, and Beverly Hills, require 500-1000 feet from homes,

2. Aesthetic Concerns : The towers will be an eyesore, detracting from the neighborhood . The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additiona l review from authorities .

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenar io) for homeowners, impact ing city tax revenues . This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church .

4. Health Concern s: We're concerned about health risks, especially for children, from radio frequency radition. Ripon schools decomm issioned towers due to cancer clusters. Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives : AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seem ingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents .

Alternative Locations :We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carm ichael Park, and a commercial property .

These are in our addendum.

Sincerely,
~
(Signature )
~
(Printed Name)
l(en l<ve,.. t'"-
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorabl e Members of the Santa Clara City Counc il \ j.S'
Subject: City Cou ncil Appeal Feb 41', 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 3111 Benton Street and Support Addendum to Appeal ·f L N ;). 5" - Ot:> o .;l. e, Honorab le City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents , urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations . We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details. Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:
,,__ 1. Proximity & Code Violation: The proposed cell towe r violates the spirit of the city's new 300-foot setback rule and is an irresponsible placemen t by common sense interpretation. Many cities, like Los Altos, Fremont, and Beverly Hills, require 500-1000 feet from homes,

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore , detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additional review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values. Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenario) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overtoo'ked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seemingly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents.

Alternative Locatio ns:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore: City public right-of-way, Central Park, Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Eart Carmichael Park, and a commercial property.

These are in our addendum.

This project burdens our community . Prioritize resident well being over financial gains for AT&T/church . We urge rejection of the 3111 Benton St cell tower and relocate it elsewhere more compatible. See addendum for full details.
(Printed Name)
GG.0Rrpt3 :3oH0.50 V
PrJ?/r.~'J0k---V
_fl\Ait f DJ o / I
I \I;:\~ Pol'\€ rcy
Ito 5 folk(a)
(Address) ) 1/
~~I /'3.EtiVT<J ,J
J;J.. IS- f!>(d-.1> ~
\(6) fotv'--e,,r-{)t
Neighborhood Residents (AT&T Tower Relocation Group)
Feb 2025
To: The Honorable Members of the Santa Clara City Council , PS
Subject: City Council Appeal FebK, 2025: Reject AT&T Cell Tower Proposal at 31 11 Benton Street and Support Addendum to Appeal p j_/J .Q_ 5"' - O <::> o ol ci, Honorable City Council Members,
We, the undersigned Santa Clara residents, urge you to reject the proposed AT&T cell tower at 3111 Benton Street, and direct AT&T to explore more appropriate locations . We are deeply concerned about the negative impacts and ask you to review the addendum to our Feb 11 appeal for full details . Key Reasons for requesting rejection and relocation of towers:
,.. 1. Proximity & Code Violation: The proposed cell tower violates the spirit of the city's new 300-foot setback rule and is an irrespons ible placement by common sense interpretation . Many cities, like Los Altos , Fremont , and Beverly Hills, require 500-1000 feet from homes ,

2. Aesthetic Concerns: The towers will be an eyesore , detracting from the neighborhood. The Historic Pomeroy Green area mighty need additiona l review from authorities.

3. Property Value Loss: Cell towers lower values . Our addendum estimates multi-million dollar losses ($8M in one scenar io) for homeowners, impacting city tax revenues. This comes at expense of benefits to AT&T/church .

4. Health Concerns: We're concerned about health risks, espec ially for children, from radio frequency radition. Ripon schools decomm issioned towers due to cancer clusters . Santa Clara High is within 300ft; this location would also have 8+ base stations including Verizon towers.

5. Risk of Fire: Cell towers can catch fire and spread rapidly.

6. Inadequate Alternatives: AT&T has overlooked viable alternative locations proposed by residents, seeming ly choosing the church site for convenience at expense of residents .

Alternative Locations:We urge you to direct AT&T to fully explore : City public right-of-way, Centra l Park , Saratoga Creek right-of-way, Earl Carmichael Park, and a commercia l property.

These are in our addendum .

Sincerely,
(Printed Name)

City Council and Authorities ConcurrentFebruary 25, 2025

City Council and Authorities Concurrent
February 25, 2025