2 Attachment 12 - Lick Mill Boulevard Analysis Summary Table Segment Concept
Collision
Reduction
Potential
Estimated
Parking
Availability1,2
Number of Deficient
Intersections
Corridor Travel
Time4
Estimated VMT
Reduction
Lick Mill
Boulevard
Existing Conditions/ No Build
Option N/A 54% AM: 2
PM: 1
6 Minutes
33 Seconds N/A
Two Lanes, Buffered Bike Lanes,
Parking on Both Sides Yes 54% AM: 2
PM: 1
6 Minutes
36 Seconds
16,095 miles/
year
Two Lanes, Parking Protected
Bike Lanes Yes 53% AM: 2
PM: 1
6 Minutes
36 Seconds
16,095 miles/
year
Three/Four Lanes, Protected and
Buffered Bike Lanes, Remove
Parking
Yes
No Parking
Available
(121 Cars with No
Available
Parking)3
AM: 2
PM: 1
6 Minutes
34 Seconds
16,095 miles/
year
1 Reflects average parking availability (total parking minus utilization) for the peak parking hour during observations: Weekdays, 7AM -8AM 2 Includes parking availability of side streets within 500ft of the study corridor 3 A total of 121 cars would not have nearby and available on-street parking to relocate to, resulting in an availability of -80%. This includes 98 cars that are assumed to be associated with temporary construction parking. Excluding the cars associated with temporary construction, the estimated parking availability would be -5%.
4 Reflects change in delay at signalized intersections only. Additional travel time may occur with lane removal due to increased friction in remaining lane (s).
Kimley>>> Horn City of
Santa Clara