Correspondence
3/25/25 City Council Meeting
2518 Mission College Blvd.
RTC 25-166
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
__,
Building Houses with no solution for water is nonsense! Monday, April 29, 2024 4:33:42 PM
I You don't ofte n get email from
I find it disturbing that Santa Clara is gleefully authorizing housing when we live in a desert.
You expect those of us here to use less and less water while authorizing the building of more and more housing.
Where is plain common sense?
What will 1792 apaiime nts require in the way of additional water? Let's assume 2 or 3 people, toilets, baths, launchy, dishes? And you want me to not water my l0sq feet of yai·d that feeds hummingbird s, bees and helps provide oxygen to the environment. Ridiculous! What is the city's solution? It is like sticking your head in the sand. One day you tum on the faucet and there will not be one ch·ip! How many jobs will there be when this happens.
Brenda
VenetianBeadShop.com
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date: Friday, September 20, 2024 11:05:30 AM
I You don't often get email from
Hello Carlene and Jim,
Thank you for presenting Irvine Company's Santa Clara Park to om members at last month's Project Advocacy Committee meeting.
Your project scored 3.43 out of 5 among our members. Overall, our members particularly liked these aspects of the project:
• bicycle infrastmcture enhancements
• commitment to the preservation of existing redwood trees • ongoing monthly meetings with the community
Although some aspects were well received, the project did not meet our 3.5 out of 5 threshold for advocacy. Our goal is for projects to score as high as possible, and we are confident that with our members' feedback, Santa Clara Park can achieve a higher score. The following documents contain our members' recommendations and suggestions:
1. Letter : Positive elements and recommendations
2. Scorecard : Our members' scores for each of our categories In the meantime , we're happy to set up a call to answer any questions you may have about our members' feedback.
In the coming days, we will post the project on our website . The page will include the letter and scorecard shared above.
Thanks again for sharing Santa Clara Park with us. We look fo1ward to continuing to work with you on this project.
Best,
Jake Wilde
Manager of Development Projects I Catalyze SV
www.CatalyzeSiliconValley.org
www.CatalyzeSiliconValley.org
September 20, 2024
Carlene Matchniff
Irvine Company
5451 Great America Pkwy, #201
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Jim Cunneen
California Strategies
RE: Irvine Company Proposal for Santa Clara Park
Dear Carlene & Jim,
Thank you for sharing Irvine Company’s Santa Clara Park with our members at our August 28 Project Advocacy Meeting. As we understand it, Santa Clara Park is a five-building, 1,792-unit mixed-income development located on a 25.74-acre site at 2518 Mission College Boulevard. The proposal will replace the existing 12 office buildings with 6.43 acres of public open space and over 1,740,000 square feet of residential space. The residential units are split between all five-story buildings that are a mix of studios, 1-bedrooms, and 2-bedrooms. Each bedroom contributes one parking space for a total of 2445 parking spaces plus an additional 90 spaces for visitors and guests. Plans also call for a small 4,000-square-foot centrally located cafe, as well as amenities for residents only, like a fitness center, co-working space, and two swimming pools.
With the project well underway, our members would like to offer the following feedback and suggestions:
Standout Elements:
Community
As advocates of inclusive engagement, our members are pleased with Irvine Company’s efforts to engage the community, especially its future plans for monthly meetings where community members can get involved in the development process. Our members recommend these meetings be advertised to the community through sufficient channels so as to reach as many folks as possible. Additionally, since Santa Clara Park is geared toward young, working professionals, some of our members want to see Irvine Company directly reach out to Mission College students, located just a few blocks down the street. The student community could be the focus of one of the monthly meetings.
Sustainability
Our members appreciate and recognize Santa Clara Park as a standout project in our sustainability category. The project is aiming for GreenPoint Gold certification, will 1 CATALYZE SV
www.CatalyzeSiliconValley.org
have rooftop photovoltaics, and makes use of reclaimed water. These features put Santa Clara Park a head above the rest. For Santa Clara Park to improve even further in this category, some of our members would like to see the project better interface with the plants and wildlife of the San Tomas Aquino Creek. They suggest incorporating more riparian vegetation as well as pollinator-friendly trees into the project’s plentiful open green space. Members also want to see the project’s windows made bird-safe, as San Tomas Aquino Creek is a habitat for a plethora of diverse bird species.
Legacy
Members of Catalyze SV do not typically score projects in our Legacy category but felt it was important and relevant to Santa Clara Park in one regard—the preservation of the redwood trees. Our members are ecstatic to hear that Irvine Company is making the effort to preserve as many of the existing redwood trees as possible. As the site is currently a parking lot and private office campus, our members hope the community will one day be able to enjoy the redwood trees as part of a public park. We will be tracking this aspect of the project to make sure Irvine follows through on preserving the redwoods.
Elements to Improve:
Vibracny
Finding and keeping commercial tenants isn’t always easy. Our members understand this. Yet the more people in an area, the more it can support vibrant activity like retail and restaurants. We are impressed by Irvine Company’s partial solution to this issue—operate its own in-house cafe and market. While we have never heard of this model, Irvine Company has tested a similar approach at its Redwood Place project in Sunnyvale. As described to us, this type of establishment will sell a range of goods to residents and the public, potentially filling a role similar to a convenience store. The cafe is a positive step. Our members stand by a bigger approach to vibrancy that entails more ground-floor activations near residents. We want Irvine Company to activate more space in the development for neighbors. River View Apartment Homes, a 1,308-unit Irvine Company community in San Jose, hosts a diverse collection of businesses, including restaurants, healthcare providers, and financial services. Our members note that Santa Clara Park’s neighboring Irvine property, Santa Clara Square, has some noteworthy retail but lacks a substantial connection to Santa Clara Park as they are on opposite sides of Highway 101. The trail beneath the highway is not the same as a walkable neighborhood street. It is especially problematic at night or for those more vulnerable who would fear for their safety going under an overpass. Santa Clara Park should attempt to foster its own activity hub that does not rely on Santa Clara Square’s existing amenities, especially considering it proposes so many homes as part of this project. It should consider complementing its solar rooftops with activation on top of them for residents. Housing is 2 CATALYZE SV
•
www.CatalyzeSiliconValley.org
wonderful and our region’s highest need, yet we need complete neighborhoods if we’re truly providing livable communities. Santa Clara Park needs to be a next-generation development.
Transportation
The San Tomas Aquino Creek Trail is the existing active transportation connection between Santa Clara Park and Santa Clara Square. The distance between the two properties is roughly one mile, and it would take a bicyclist at an average speed of roughly six and a half minutes on a mixed-use path. Our members appreciate that Santa Clara Park will improve cycling access from the site to the trail by installing new bike lanes along Freedom Circle. However, they are concerned regarding the reliability of the trail as the main connection to Santa Clara Square, which, in addition to a grocer and a few other businesses, primarily hosts restaurants and bars. During the day, commuting between the two locations is not an issue, but the trail closes at sunset. This means that during the busiest hours, traveling by car is the most viable option. Even if the trail were open, it would need significant lighting improvements to make it safe. It is an unfortunate situation, especially since our members are very impressed by the other cycling accommodations, like the 1,792 private bicycle stalls for residents. This is a huge effort by Irvine and represents the best of current development projects. We encourage Irvine Company, Valley Water, and Santa Clara to work together to enhance the north-south connection between these sites. As is, the only option for anyone outside of a car past sunset is to ride or walk along a six-lane highway service interchange.
Intensity/Zoning
Santa Clara Park proposes a total of 1,792 units split between five, five-story buildings.
Our members understand this is a typical footprint for an Irvine Company project, but as advocates for dense urban housing, we want Santa Clara Park to match not just higher possible densities allowed by the construction type Irvine proposes here but also match the existing character of the neighborhood. Directly to the project’s south are two 11-story buildings. To the project’s west are another two 12-story buildings, and north of those is the 14-story Santa Clara Marriott. East of the project is Mission City Center, a 13-story high-rise accompanied by a separate seven-story parking garage. At only five stories, Santa Clara Park is rather short in the surrounding context. In the midst of our housing crisis, where supply is nowhere near meeting demands, our members want to see projects that maximize the use of our scarce land and deliver as many homes as possible. We urge the developer to increase the height by two to three stories. Again, an urban development in Silicon Valley in 2024 cannot leave this many homes on the table when they are feasible. We will fight hard to support Irvine Company in making this change.
Affordability
Santa Clara Park proposes a total of 1,792 units split between five, five-story buildings.
Our members understand this is a typical footprint for an Irvine Company project, but 3 •
~
w
CATALYZE SV
www.CatalyzeSiliconValley.org
as advocates for dense urban housing, we want Santa Clara Park to match not just higher possible densities allowed by the construction type Irvine proposes here but also match the existing character of the neighborhood. Directly to the project’s south are two 11-story buildings. To the project’s west are another two 12-story buildings, and north of those is the 14-story Santa Clara Marriott. East of the project is Mission City Center, a 13-story high-rise accompanied by a separate seven-story parking garage. At only five stories, Santa Clara Park is rather short in the surrounding context. In the midst of our housing crisis, where supply is nowhere near meeting demands, our members want to see projects that maximize the use of our scarce land and deliver as many homes as possible. We urge the developer to increase the height by two to three stories. Again, an urban development in Silicon Valley in 2024 cannot leave this many homes on the table when they are feasible. We will fight hard to support Irvine Company in making this change.
Santa Clara Park has the potential to provide a home to thousands of people, and we will fight hard to turn that potential into reality. After decades of declining housing construction and underbuilding, it is crucial to maximize density whenever the opportunity arises. We hope Santa Clara and Irvine Company will work together to find a path that makes the most out of this site.
Sincerely,
Catalyze SV’s staff and Project Advocacy Committee members CC: [email protected]
Mayor Lisa Gillmor ([email protected])
Kathy Watanabe ([email protected])
Karen Hardy ([email protected])
Suds Jain ([email protected])
Raj Chahal ([email protected])
Kevin Park ([email protected])
Anthony Becker ([email protected])
City Clerk ([email protected])
Nimisha Agrawal ([email protected])
Lesley Xavier ([email protected])
Reena Brilliot ([email protected])
Planning Commission ([email protected]) Planning Division ([email protected])
Benjamin Demers
Cade Story- Y etto
Rachael Gibson
Roseryn Bhudsabourg
Genevieve Yip
Carlene Matchni
ff
Jim Cunneen
Jimmy Ly
4 CATALYZE SV
www.CatalyzeSiliconValley.org
About Catalyze SV
Catalyze SV’s Project Advocacy Committee is comprised of community members who identify, evaluate, & lead advocacy e
fforts around speci fic development projects.
5 CATALYZE SV
Project Review Scorecard
Project Under Review: Santa Clara Park
Project Applicant: Irvine Company
Review Date: August 28, 2024
Community Score: 4/5
As advocates of inclusive engagement, our members are pleased with Irvine Company’s efforts to engage the community, especially its future plans for monthly meetings where community members can get involved in the development process. Our members recommend these meetings be advertised to the community through sufficient channels so as to reach as many folks as possible. Additionally, since Santa Clara Park is geared toward young, working professionals, some of our members want to see Irvine Company directly reach out to Mission College students, located just a few blocks down the street. The student community could be the focus of one of the monthly meetings.
Vibrancy Score: 3/5
Finding and keeping commercial tenants isn’t always easy. Our members understand this. Yet the more people in an area, the more it can support vibrant activity like retail and restaurants. We are impressed by Irvine Company’s partial solution to this issue—operate its own in-house cafe. While we have never heard of this model, Irvine Company has tested a similar approach at its Redwood Place project in Sunnyvale. As described to us, this type of establishment will sell a range of goods to residents and the public, potentially filling a role similar to a convenience store. The cafe is a positive step. Our members stand by a bigger approach to vibrancy that entails more ground-floor activations near residents. We want Irvine Company to activate more space in the development for neighbors. River View Apartment Homes, a 1,308-unit Irvine Company community in San Jose, hosts a diverse collection of businesses, including restaurants, healthcare providers, and financial services. Our members note that Santa Clara Park’s neighboring Irvine property, Santa Clara Square, has some noteworthy retail but lacks a substantial connection to Santa Clara Park as they are on opposite sides of Highway 101. The trail beneath the highway is not the same as a walkable neighborhood street. It is especially problematic at night or for those more vulnerable who would fear for their safety going under an overpass. Santa Clara Park should attempt to foster its own activity hub that does not rely on Santa Clara Square’s existing amenities, especially considering it proposes so many homes as part of this project. It should consider complementing its solar rooftops with activation on top of them for residents.
Housing is wonderful and our region’s highest need, yet we need complete neighborhoods if we’re truly providing livable communities. Santa Clara Park needs to be a next-generation development. 1 CATALYZE SV
Transportation Score: 3/5
The San Tomas Aquino Creek Trail is the existing active transportation connection between Santa Clara Park and Santa Clara Square. The distance between the two properties is roughly one mile, and it would take a bicyclist at an average speed of roughly six and a half minutes on a mixed-use path. Our members appreciate that Santa Clara Park will improve cycling access from the site to the trail by installing new bike lanes along Freedom Circle. However, they are concerned regarding the reliability of the trail as the main connection to Santa Clara Square, which, in addition to a grocer and a few other businesses, primarily hosts restaurants and bars. During the day, commuting between the two locations is not an issue, but the trail closes at sunset. This means that during the busiest hours, traveling by car is the most viable option. Even if the trail were open, it would need significant lighting improvements to make it safe. It is an unfortunate situation, especially since our members are very impressed by the other cycling accommodations, like the 1,792 private bicycle stalls for residents. This is a huge effort by Irvine and represents the best of current development projects. We encourage Irvine Company, Valley Water, and Santa Clara to work together to enhance the north-south connection between these sites. As is, the only option for anyone outside of a car past sunset is to ride or walk along a six-lane highway service interchange.
Sustainability Score: 4/5
Our members appreciate and recognize Santa Clara Park as a standout project in our sustainability category. The project is aiming for GreenPoint Gold certification, will have rooftop photovoltaics, and makes use of reclaimed water. These features put Santa Clara Park a head above the rest. For Santa Clara Park to improve even further in this category, some of our members would like to see the project better interface with the plants and wildlife of the San Tomas Aquino Creek. They suggest incorporating more riparian vegetation as well as pollinator-friendly trees into the project’s plentiful open green space. Members also want to see the project’s windows made bird-safe, as San Tomas Aquino Creek is a habitat for a plethora of diverse bird species.
Intensity/Zoning Score: 3/5
Santa Clara Park proposes a total of 1,792 units split between five, five-story buildings. Our members understand this is a typical footprint for an Irvine Company project, but as advocates for dense urban housing, we want Santa Clara Park to match not just higher possible densities allowed by the construction type Irvine proposes here but also match the existing character of the neighborhood. Directly to the project’s south are two 11-story buildings. To the project’s west are another two 12-story buildings, and north of those is the 14-story Santa Clara Marriott. East of the project is Mission City Center, a 13-story high-rise accompanied by a separate seven-story parking garage. At only five stories, Santa Clara Park is rather short in the surrounding context. In the midst of our housing crisis, where supply is nowhere near meeting demands, our members want to see projects that maximize the use of our scarce land and deliver as many homes as possible. We urge the developer to increase the height by two to three stories. Again, an urban development in Silicon Valley in 2024 cannot leave this many homes on the table when they are feasible. We will fight hard to support Irvine Company in making this change.
2 CATALYZE SV
•
Affordability Score: 3/5
Santa Clara Park complies with the city’s Affordable Housing Ordinance by providing 15% of units as deed-restricted affordable housing. Our members are glad to see these units will be on-site and integrated with the market-rate units. As presented to our members, the project aims to provide 5% of the affordable units to very low-income households, which for a two-person household is $73,750, and the remaining 10% of units will be provided to households earning the area median income, $147,450 for a household of two. Our members value deeply affordable housing and also recognize the potential for “affordable by design” units to deliver lower housing costs, but ultimately it is deed-restricted affordable housing that provides the greatest impact. While $147k meets the legal definition of affordable housing, this is well above a middle-class income, even in Silicon Valley. As such, our members encourage the developer to offer all the affordable units to households in very low or lower income levels to serve our neediest neighbors.
Legacy Score: 4/5
Members of Catalyze SV do not typically score projects in our Legacy category but felt it was important and relevant to Santa Clara Park in one regard—the preservation of the redwood trees.
Our members are ecstatic to hear that Irvine Company is making the effort to preserve as many of the existing redwood trees as possible. As the site is currently a parking lot and private office campus, our members hope the community will one day be able to enjoy the redwood trees as part of a public park. We will be tracking this aspect of the project to make sure Irvine follows through on preserving the redwoods.
Cumulative Score: 3.43 out of 5
3 ~
w
•
CATALYZE SV
OVERVIEW
This project review scorecard provides guidelines for consistently evaluating how a proposed development aligns with Catalyze SV’s values. Catalyze SV’s values are:
● Inclusive, Diverse Communities
● Healthy, Sustainable Development
● Convenient Transportation Choices
● Housing Solutions for All
● Vibrant Places for People
● Equitable Community Engagement
Grading Criteria - Merits
Community: The applicant is making signi ficant efforts to reach out to the community, including underrepresented** voices, and has addressed recommendations collected through community engagement.
Vibrancy: The proposal seizes locational opportunities and includes features to enhance the human experience of the site and neighborhood. Public and private space is designed to promote physical, mental, and/or social well-being while connecting with parks, fresh food, and/or other community amenities.
Transportation: The project recognizes the growing importance of a variety of mobility solutions, incentivizes reduced automobile usage, and measures mobility after the project is built and occupied. Transportation Demand Management plans are encouraged.
Sustainability: The project incorporates measurable green building features. CalGreen Tier 1/2 measures and/or third-party certi
fications (LEED, WELL, Living Building Challenge, etc) are encouraged. Some features can be found here:
https://www.catalyzesiliconvalley.org/sustainable-features.
Intensity/Zoning: The project utilizes nearly the full density allowed under its zoning and general plan designations.
A
ffordability: The proposal considers protections or relocation bene fits for existing residential and/or commercial tenants that may be displaced. It goes beyond current government requirements for onsite, below-market-rate homes, stabilized commercial leases, or appropriate substitutes.
Legacy (when applicable): The project undertakes e fforts to incorporate, protect, or preserve any objects of signi ficant cultural or historic merit identi fied by the community on or near the site.
** = Research has shown that renters, new residents, people of color, younger people, and females tend to be underrepresented voices on local development issues. (1 2 3) Grading Scale - Merits
An average score of 3.5 is required for Catalyze SV to consider advocating full support for a project.
1 = Fails to meet project review criteria
2 = Meets some project review criteria
3 = Meets basic project review criteria
4 = Exceeds project review criteria
5 = Goes far beyond project review criteria
N/A = Category does not apply
4 • •
~
• • e
•
CATALYZE SV
Catalyze SV
www.CatalyzeSiliconValley.org
Dear Catalyze SV Staff & Project Advocacy Committee members:
Thank you for taking the time to review Irvine Company’s proposed Santa Clara Park Project located at 2518 MIssion College Blvd, Santa Clara. We are writing to add additional information that was in process or still under review by the City of Santa Clara at the time we presented our proposed project to your group on August 28, 2024. Your support is important to us and we hope that we will be able to provide you with additional information and clarify points to gain Catalyze’s support for the project.
Community
We appreciate and share CatalyzeSV’s commitment to engaging with the community. We will continue our outreach throughout the entitlement process via community meetings, our project website and ongoing engagement with local residents and organizations. Upcoming community meetings will be posted on the city’s website.
Sustainability
Sustainability has always been a central tenet of Irvine Company developments, an example of which are the nearby Santa Clara Square and Redwood Place developments. In response to your comments, we would like to clarify the following points from your letter:
● Reduced Runoff: The project will significantly decrease impervious area resulting in less runoff when compared to current conditions.
● Improved Water Quality: Bioretention treatment is designed to filter out pollutants prior to stormwater entering natural systems.
● Green Infrastructure Amenity: The treatment areas provide an additional landscaping amenity for pedestrian use around the site.
● Heat Reduction: Treatment areas and vegetation around the site help lower site surface temperatures when compared to current conditions.
● Installation of all electric appliances.
● The project includes 50% EV stall capacity.
● The Landscape Plant palette will be climate appropriate to the region with a focus on Mediterranean and drought tolerant species that meet or exceed local and regional water use regulations.
● Windows will be bird friendly.
● Carbon Capture and Sequestration through preserving, relocating, or reusing existing Redwood trees and planting 997 new trees.
frl IRVINE COMPANY
~<J' APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT
● Photovoltaic Systems installed on garage and residential roof tops to benefit common area energy usage.
● Reducing vehicle miles traveled by 20% over existing conditions, including 10% from TDM measures, and 10% from physical design features.
● Extending reclaimed water line to complete Freedom Circle Loop. ● The sustainable features of the project would achieve LEED Gold equivalent.
Legacy
Tree preservation. Of the 417 existing trees on-site, we plan on preserving approximately 130..
This will include protecting-in-place 81 Coast Redwoods, 14 Japanese Zelkovas (large, existing street trees along Mission College), and 1 Stone Pine. We will also box and relocate another 34 existing Redwoods elsewhere on the project site. Existing trees requiring removal due to health or other reasons will be replaced at a 2:1 ratio at a size of 24” Box or larger per the City of Santa Clara guidelines. We intend to add approximately 997 new trees (quantity subject to change during the design process) which is well over the 578 required by the city’s tree replacement standards. For those redwood trees unsuitable for preservation, an effort will be made (where feasible) to repurpose the salvaged wood into furniture or other site elements within the landscape.
Throughout the project will be a series of miniparks which will take inspiration from “The Life Cycle of Redwoods”. Each mini-park will include themed, educational or interactive spaces focused on each phase of a redwoods growth starting from Seed, growing into Sapling, Fully Mature Tree/ Forest, and Fallen Logs. A continuous trail system throughout the community will interlink all of these spaces together and connect them to our large, neighborhood park at the southern end of the site which features several active and passive spaces tucked into several mature Redwoods Groves.
Beyond this plan, our scale and commitment to community forestry has allowed us to plant more than 550,000 trees that sequester 7 million pounds of carbon. I invite you to learn more about our community forestry program here: irvinecompany.com/communityforestry/ Vibrancy
Consistent with the City of Santa Clara’s Freedom Circle Focus Area Plan, the site is designated as a high-density residential community with commercial uses adjacent. However, in addition to housing, we are offering an on-site centrally located market/cafe managed by Irvine Company to provide residents, neighboring office tenants and park users, daily food and beverages from the opening of the project. This will cut down auto trips and allow residents daily conveniences without getting into their cars.
frl IRVINE COMPANY
~<J' APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT
In addition, we have evaluated proximity to the food and services located within a 1-mile radius of our project. Our project design ensures the right balance of retail, and residential in both Santa Clara Park and our adjacent Santa Clara Square community, and believe this will create a cohesive, right-sized approach to mixed-use experiences.In addition, within this 1 mile radius are other retail options, including the Mercado shopping center.
Transportation
This project is designed to accommodate secure bicycle parking for each unit, located within bicycle rooms in each building garage. The project will also offer bicycle repair stations and electric bicycle charging in the bicycle rooms. Overall, the project is designed for connectivity adding 1 mile of dedicated bike lane improvements that will benefit not only this project but the region.
The San T omas Aquino trail, is a multi-jurisdictional, and multi-functional facility (containing both trail and environmentally sensitive areas) under the jurisdiction of public entities and, thus, not an element of our proposal (nor are there any conditions that would have to be universally applicable to other development in the region for undefined improvements). As such, we respectfully suggest that the scoring for our development should not be discounted in this area.
In terms of food and services, both the Mercado shopping center and Santa Clara Square are located nearby and the development will be located conveniently to use electric bikes, scooters, bicycles, and by foot within a 10 minute walk or ride.
Intensity/Zoning
As a long-term owner committed to preserving the quality and the identity of the communities we plan, we appreciate the City’s planning efforts with respect to the Freedom Circle Focus Area Plan. The Plan allows for a range of housing opportunities including developments assumed to be at a density range between 51-100 du/ac. The proposed development is about 69 du/ac. In addition to density, however, it is important to balance the character of our developments, the current pressing need for housing not only in context with adjacent land uses but in terms of the ability to deliver that housing given economic, infrastructure and overall mandated community elements such as parks, affordable housing, and other site-specific improvements. In that regard we have proposed the five-story wrap-type configuration. This product type strikes a balance between density and livability, providing both a high-quality living experience and compatible land use relative to the surrounding area and will result in housing designed to address needs of the nearby employment sectors. frl IRVINE COMPANY
~<J' APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT
Affordability
Affordable housing is an integral part of the Santa Clara Park plan. Unlike other developments that provide affordable housing off-site or pay fees (which are indeed essential elements as a part of an overall affordable housing strategy meeting other income level thresholds) we have proposed, including deed restrictions ensuring retention of affordability levels in perpetuity, that 15% of the total units (with 5%, at 50% AMI and 10% at 100% AMI) be provided in perpetuity within the Santa Clara Park community providing those employed in nearby job centers the ability to live close to where they work.
In addition to the 15% of units designated for deed restricted affordable housing, we are also providing a wide range or unit square footage options that are intended to provide affordable by design units. These units will provide additional moderate income units to the overall market.
We are hopeful the additional information provided here will assist Catalyze SV with the re-evaluation of our original scorecard. The City of Santa Clara identified the need to focus more growth in North Santa Clara through the vision created in the Freedom Circle Future Focus Area. An important part of this vision was identifying the need for more housing. Irvine Company looks forward to addressing a significant portion of this need with the plan we have created for the Santa Clara Park Redevelopment, central to Freedom Circle. Our plan is designed to address a range of housing types, including affordable housing, resident-serving amenities, a public park system, private open space, and connectivity to the surrounding community. Thank you for your consideration of our proposed development at Freedom Circle.
Sincerely,
Carlen