Cities Index.
POST MEETING MATERIAL

City Council and Authorities Concurrent
September 23, 2025

Document
POST MEETING MATERIAL
Meeting
September 23, 2025
Body
City Council and Authorities Concurrent
Original file
610 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santaclara.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

Sep 23, 2025 City of Santa Clara 1500 Warburton Avenue Santa Clara, CA 95050 Re: Proposed Housing Development Project at 1530-1540 Pomeroy Avenue To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Dear Santa Clara City Council, The California Housing Defense Fund (“CalHDF”) submits this letter to remind the City of its obligation

to

abide

by

all

relevant

state

laws

when

evaluating

the

proposed

11-unit

housing

development

project

at

1530-1540

Pomeroy

Avenue.

These

laws

include

the

Housing

Accountability

Act

(“HAA”)

and

California

Environmental

Quality

Act

(“CEQA”)

guidelines.

The HAA provides the project legal protections. It requires approval of zoning and general plan

compliant

housing

development

projects

unless

findings

can

be

made

regarding

specific,

objective,

written

health

and

safety

hazards.

(Gov.

Code,

§

65589.5,

subd.

(j).)

The

HAA

also

bars

cities

from

imposing

conditions

on

the

approval

of

such

projects

that

would

reduce

the

project’s

density

unless,

again,

such

written

findings

are

made.

(
Ibid
.)

As

a

development

with

at

least

two-thirds

of

its

area

devoted

to

residential

uses,

the

project

falls

within

the

HAA’s

ambit,

and

it

complies

with

local

zoning

code

and

the

City’s

general

plan.

The

HAA’s

protections

therefore

apply,

and

the

City

may

not

reject

the

project

except

based

on

health

and

safety

standards,

as

outlined

above.

Furthermore,

if

the

City

rejects

the

project

or

impairs

its

feasibility,

it

must

conduct

“a

thorough

analysis

of

the

economic,

social,

and

environmental

effects

of

the

action.”

(
Id
.

at

subd.

(b).)

Furthermore, the project is exempt from state environmental review pursuant to sections 15162

and

15164

of

the

CEQA

Guidelines.

Caselaw

from

the

California

Court

of

Appeal

affirms

that

local

governments

err,

and

may

be

sued,

when

they

improperly

refuse

to

grant

a

project
2201 Broadway, PH1, Oakland, CA 94612 www.calhdf.org

a CEQA exemption or streamlined CEQA review to which it is entitled. ( Hilltop Group, Inc. v.

County

of

San

Diego

(2024)

99 Cal.App.5th

890,

911.)
As you are well aware, California remains in the throes of a statewide crisis-level housing shortage.

New

housing

such

as

this

is

a

public

benefit:

it

will

increase

the

city’s

tax

base;

it

will

bring

new

customers

to

local

businesses;

and

it

will

reduce

displacement

of

existing

residents

by

reducing

competition

for

existing

housing.

It

will

also

help

cut

down

on

transportation-related

greenhouse

gas

emissions

by

providing

housing

in

denser,

more

urban

areas,

as

opposed

to

farther-flung

regions

in

the

state

(and

out

of

state).

While

no

one

project

will

solve

the

statewide

housing

crisis,

the

proposed

development

is

a

step

in

the

right

direction.

CalHDF

urges

the

City

to

approve

it,

consistent

with

its

obligations

under

state

law.

CalHDF is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation whose mission includes advocating for increased

access

to

housing

for

Californians

at

all

income

levels,

including

low-income
households. You may learn more about CalHDF at www.calhdf.org. Sincerely, Dylan Casey CalHDF Executive Director James M. Lloyd CalHDF Director of Planning and Investigations 2 of 2

← All documents from this meeting