Santa Clarita City Council
April 12, 2022

Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink
Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034
Anil Verma Associates
444 S Flower Street, Suite 1688, Los Angeles, CA 90071
T el: (213) 624-6908 Fax: (213) 624-1188
[email protected], anilverma.com
March 3, 2022
Revised March 28, 2022

Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 Proposal Letter .........................................................................................................

Introduction .......................................................................................section one Statement of Qualifications & Assigned Staff ..................................................section two a. firm’s qualifications
b. assigned staff
c. comparable work
Work Statement ....................................................................................section three Schedule ......................................................................................section four Subconsultants .......................................................................................section five *See separate envelope for total cost file
Proposal Contents
Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 Proposal Letter
March 3, 2022
Mr. Jonathan Cosh
City of Santa Clarita
RE: City of Santa Clarita Professional Services Proposal for Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034
Dear Mr. Cosh:

It is my great pleasure to provide the city of City of Santa Clarita a proposal for architectural, landscape architectural, and engineering design services of this skating rink project. We have studied the RFP and have taken the opportunity to research additional information and want to express our enthusiasm for the opportunity to work with the city of City of Santa Clarita! The project is well suited to our firm’s profile. We have put together a talented and experienced team to address the scope of work. The AVA Team has many unique qualities that will benefit the city of City of Santa Clarita:

The AVA Team in known for creating exceptional spaces that give form and character to the landscape, providing distinctive artistry and economic value for our clients. We consult, collaborate, imagine and design a project’s scope and character.

The AVA Team has extensive local, national and international experience. Sustainable design is a guiding principle of the firm. Our team has worked on several LEED-certified projects. We have built our business on pushing the boundaries to create the right solution. We strive to find this balance in a design that can transcend the value for our client to enrich the community experience. We bring a depth of experience and discipline to every commission, taking a holistic view of a project from consulting on land planning and urban design to landscape architecture. Our work, whether it is new construction or updates of existing properties, often becomes the heart of a project, providing a sanctuary where residents, work- ers and visitors gather.

The AVA Team has built a portfolio of landscape architecture designs for public, private and civic clients.

Currently the firm has under design development and construction, several projects ranging from hundreds of thousands to multiple billion dollar-projects including parks and preserves, civic facilities, housing, urban streetscapes, schools, theme parks, and transit stations.

I want to thank you in advance for your consideration of The AVA Team for this exciting project. We look forward to hearing from you soon and exceeding your expectations.

Sincerely,
Anil Verma, FAIA
Principal
1 Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 Section One
Introduction
3Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 The upcoming Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink proposal calls for a project team with creative design experience and fine-tuned attention to the community’s needs. The AV A team’s experience, both individually and collectively will demonstrate our ability to assist the City of Santa Clarita in the design and construction of this park.

UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT
The City of Santa Clarita is continuing to grow as a hub for the surounding region and the investment into infrustructure and enhanced community destinations is well recongnized. This project will bring an additional active amenity to a flourising community. The City of Santa Clarita’s vision for this roller skating rink includes, at a minimum, an outdoor rink with dasher boards. The dasher boards shall have gates for maintenance access. There must be an accessible audio/video room, a shaded spectator seating area, a four sided hip roof to match existing gazebo designs, hardscape and landscape features around the rink, security cameras, disco balls, LED lighting and a sound system with multiple speakers and inputs, WIFI access, a private audio booth and a drinking fountain.

The scope involves a preliminary investigation of the site, project management, design services, plan review and permits. Construction documents for civil engineering, architecture, structural engineering, electrical engineering, plumbing, landscape and hardscape plans and specifications will be prepared for review and approval as well as issuance for construction. The winning bidder will be expected to provide bid/award phase support and construction management support.

The site itself is part of a larger park. The desired roller skating rink location is adjacent to a sports complex gymnasium, some basketball courts, gazebos and a parking lot and has the opportnuity for shared amenities.

Safety is a top priority for public spaces in general as well as for this site. Easy visual lines of sights to and from the facility is critical as well as lighting and pathway layout. As a peice of the overall park, the new roller skating ring should blend into the surrounding complex and complement its needs. The plan will take into account the impacts on traffic, pedestrian flow, maintenance and finances. The proposed plan should also be sensitive to the needs of the diverse cultures in this neighborhood, as well as the physical needs of the park’s users, specificallly children, elderly and those with mobility challenges. Especially during the past few years of isolation for our children, fun activities that can be enjoyed by family and friends is critical. Last but not least, the proposed plan should promote the environmental health of the site.

We developed a quick study and layout to illustrate an example preliminary concept sketch shown on the nextx page, to help our team better understand the site and the scope of the project. If chosen, as AV A collaborates with the city, ongoing maintenance team and other stakeholders, the final design would evolve extensively based upon additional stakeholder vision and to meet everyone’s needs.

The team has visited the site and reviewed RFP #ENG-21-22-P3034 and Addendum #1 thoroughly.

AV A recently was the landscape architect for the design and construction of the Upper Penitencia Creek restoration for VTA in San Jose. Selecting 100% indigenous native plants gathered from within 10 miles of the area, the natural habitat was restored from a previously channelized water way. section one | Introduction
Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 4 section one | Introduction
Potential Vision of Santa Clarita Roller Rink Concept. Upon award of contract, Options will be developed based upon input from the City in a design workshop setting Example Images from other outdoor rinks for inspiration

Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 Section Two
Qualifications of Firm
and Assigned Staff
Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 6 Anil Verma Associates Inc., (AVA) | Firm Profile
AV A was established 37 years ago and is headquartered in Los Angeles, and has offices throughout the country.

AV A has provided planning, urban design, architectural and engineering design services, as well as environmental and project management services in both the public and private sector. AV A ’s expertise and experience include theme parks, community parks, long range urban master planning, public/private partnerships, pedestrian and bikeway facilities, and educational institutions.

Since its inception in 1985, AVA has witnessed the cyclical changes in the business sector, impacted by lack of funds, shortage of qualified personnel, and delays in securing public sector permits among other concerns. To stay competitive, AVA has maintained an awareness of market trends to anticipate changes well ahead of time. It is fortunate that AVA has not only secured a healthy share of business, but has also maintained a steady progression of professional development. AVA began as an architectural design firm that has followed market trends and has grown into a firm that provides a complete range of planning, design, and construction management services. In order to capture a share of profitable markets in other geographic regions of the world, AVA has set up long-term project and regional offices.

Frequently AVA has been invited to propose for projects in India, Thailand, and several other international locations. From an edgy start-up team of 2 people, AVA has maintained steady growth to a firm with over 50 personnel today, testifying to the development of our skill, and our experience to satisfy a vastly diverse set of clients and projects tasks.

State-of-the-Art Hardware and Software
AV A maintains state-of-the-art hardware and software for the preparation of design and construction documents. This includes computers for each staff member, the latest design and drafting software from AutoCAD, SketchUp, Revit, and Microsoft Office, among others. At every stage of the design phase, milestone submittals are prepared with strict adherence to quality control procedures. AV A also has in-house expertise in presentation software such as Photoshop, Illustrator, and In-Design, utilized in the production of in-house and client-requested presentation material, brochures, and reports. AV A always manages overhead costs efficiently and offers clients competitive prices. AV A has never had, nor currently has, any pending litigation.

Team Structure
We have designated a Project Manager with full authority to administer this contract, assign staff, and be responsible for compliance with all other contract requirements. The AV A Team will be led by our Project Manager, Jim Keenan. Jim is a landscape architect, licensed in the state of California, and has managed several multi-disciplinary A/E teams. Several team members have park design experience ranging from small community pocket parks to campus plaza design to major theme park designs. We believe that the talent and experience of our team are uniquely suited to this contract, and hope that our submittal is indicative of AV A ’s sincere interest in continuing to build our relationship with the City of Santa Clarita.

Assigned Staff
Name Availability Name Availability
Anil Verma, RA 50% James Keenan, RLA 65%
Somesh Debnath, RA 65% Enrique Lopez, RA 80%
Chris Rauch, PE, ME 65% Edgardo Del Rosario 75%
Raymundo Cruz, PE 50% Gregorio Del Rosario 75%
Warren Arata, RLA 50% Bret Hanson, RLA 75%
Stephanie Kennedy, RLA 75% Matt Britten, PE (CivilPros) 60% Pablo Amezquita, CTS-D (V) 50% Chris Haight, SE (Coffman) 50% section two | Qualifications of Firm and Assigned Staff 7Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 Anil Verma, FAIA, Principal-in-Charge/Sr. Architect
Anil has dedicated his entire career to the development of mass transit projects and is a regular speaker on the subject of Transit Design and City Building in many national and international conferences. He has his Architectural License in California, Arizona, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Y ork, Minnesota, Puerto Rico, Washington, and Hawaii and he has a B&A Contractor License. Anil was recongized by the American Institute of Architects and distuguished as a Fellow. He received a Masters of Architecture & Landscape Architecture at Harvard University & New Delhi School of Planning & Architecture. Mr. Verma excels in the planning, design and construction of Transit Stations, Tunnel Ventilation Structures and Maintenance Facilities. He specializes in the design of underground stations, including public spaces and ancillary equipment rooms, which are a major cost component of subway station structures. He has a thorough knowledge of all equipment requirements to operate transit systems and facilities along with all interface issues. He has designed deep tunnel and cut and cover stations. He has been involved in the planning, engineering, and construction phases of numerous rapid transit systems in the United States, Puerto Rico, Guam and India. Mr. Verma has worked on all phases of the projects beginning with alternatives analysis and conceptual design through preliminary engineering and final design. He has been an active participant in the construction management process and has had key roles in Design/Build projects such as Architect of Record, Urban Design Manager, and Inspector of Record. During his career, Mr. Verma has managed projects in the USA, Canada, Central America, the Middle, and Far East. He has taught at UCLA, USC, Cal Poly San Louis Obispo, and lectured internationally.

James Keenan, ASLA, SITES AP, Lead Landscape Architect (Landscape/Urban Design) Jim is a California licensed landscape architect and project principal with over thirty (30) years of experience in the Southern California area and is currently performing work for the City of Santa Clarita. He received a Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture at the University of California, Davis. He led the landscape and site design efforts for LAX’s Gateway to LA project as well as for Metro’s Crenshaw/LAX LRT and Regional Connector Projects. He has worked extensively with Public Agencies, Developers and Architects, and brings exceptional skills in management and design for a broad range of projects throughout the United States, Asia, and the Middle East. His diverse abilities have allowed him to lead and manage all phases of planning, landscape design and construction on a variety of challenging projects. He has a thorough knowledge of the latest irrigation technology and has an excellent understanding of planting materials. The result has been top quality implementation of neigborhood parks; living communities; amusement parks; office/commercial/institutional developments; rail transit facilities; and environmental resource preservation. He has successfully directed projects for the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles World Airports, Burbank Airport, The Walt Disney Company, The Irvine Company, Playa Vista Capitol Company, BART, Valley Transit Authority, SANDAG and other major Clients and municipalities nationally. For Disney, he has helped develop several theme parks attractions including the design for Luigi’s Flying Tires in Carsland at California Adventure which is laid out similar to a roller skating rink except for hovering vehicles. Recently, he managed the design for the Vista Canyon Metrolink Station and is part of the Via Princessa Park Team.

Somesh Debnath, AIA, Architectural Lead
Somesh has over thirty (30) years in the design and construction of transit facilities. He has his Architectural License in California and Nevada and received a Master of Architecture & Urban Design at Washington University. His experience includes stations, transit centers, rapid transit systems, rail maintenance facilities, airports, civic centers, and commercial projects. He specializes in the design of transit stations and especially underground stations where he has a thorough knowledge of the transit design criteria, mechanical, electrical and communications equipment, fire-life safety requirements and systems interface issues. He has designed public and ancillary equipment spaces of several subway stations and his experience of underground tunnel and cut and cover construction has helped resolve some extremely complex coordination issues related to equipment, systems interface, ancillary spaces and construction sequencing. He is an expert in technical drawings and specifications for rapid transit facilities and has the capability of coordinating complex criteria to reduce the size of the cut and cover footprints of stations, and thereby reducing construction costs. Somesh Debnath is a registered architect with over 30 years of experience. Besides the United States, Somesh’s experience covers many countries including Hawaii, Puerto Rico, India, Saudi Arabia and Iran. section two | Qualifications of Firm and Assigned Staff Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 8 Enrique Lopez, RA, Sr. Architect
Enrique has been in the architectural profession for the last 30 years, and his years of experience in various capacities as an architect make him a multifaceted professional. His expertise in design is amplified by his knowledge of the California Building Codes and other building standards. Enrique has been responsible for review of various building designs for code compliance as it relates to Fire/Life Safety, accessibility standards, and energy standards including coordinating with local municipal codes. Enrique has experience not only in new projects, but also in various renovation projects on existing facilities where the scope involves preparing reports for conditions of code compliance as it relates to ADA and fire/life safety and provides advice or recommendations for the renovation of work required for code compliance.

Chris Rauch, Sr. Architect
Chris has a broad range of design engineering expertise for schools, public facilities, transportation, emergency operation control centers, public work, data centers, advance technology, and research & development. System design experience includes complete HV AC systems including (V AV) air conditioning units, precision air conditioning units, direct expansion (DX) AC systems, high efficiency (HEPA) air filtration, preaction sprinklers, gas suppression (FM200), and systems requiring redundant equipment (N+1) backed up by emergency generator systems. In his multiple project engineering roles, involvement begins in conceptual/ SD and continues thru until completion with the construction administration/ commissioning phases.

Edgardo Del Rosario, Sr. Mechanical Designer
Edgar has over 30 years of experience in the design and specification of building plumbing systems for transit, commercial, military, institutional, educational, industrial, and medical facilities. He has a Bachelors of Mechanical Engineering from Mapua Institute of Technology, Manilla. His project responsibilities included complete design supervision of plumbing systems from initial design to project completion and final shop drawings. He recently completed the Plumbing design for Vista Canyon’s new Metrolink Station.

Raymundo Cruz, PE, Sr. Electrical Engineer
Ray is an experienced registered Electrical Engineer with local and international experience in the design, construction support and equipment commissioning of electrical systems. He has a Masters of Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern California (USC). He has a demonstrated ability to quickly learn and apply new concepts, easily adapts to change, mentors others, and possesses excellent communication skills.

Experienced in high and low-voltage electrical power systems, he is an effective team member working closely and coordinating with other departments, agencies and regulators. He recently completed the electrical design for Vista Canyon’s new Metrolink Station and is working on Via Princessa Park.

Gregorio Del Rosario, Sr. Electrical Designer/Lighting Designer Greg has over 35 years of electrical design experience in transit industry. He has a Bachelors of Electrical Engineering from Feati University, Manilla. He has extensive experience with rail agencies and recently complete the lighting design for Vista Canyon’s new Metrolink Station and is working on Via Princessa Park.

Warren Arata, ASLA, Sr. Landscape Architect (Irrigation) Warren has over 30 years of experience on schools, stations, civic spaces, highway & transit corridors. Warren is a certified nurseryman and Landscape Architect. He received a Bachelor in Landscape Architecture from Cal Poly Pomona. His botanical knowledge of plant materials extends from plant design selection to soils adaptations as well as suitable species selection based on specific environments. He has worked on multiple high traffic, vandal prone landscapes and landscapes within Public areas of excessive wear and tear where low maintenance is inevitable. In addition, his expertise in efficient irrigation systems concurrent with the latest low water use technology which matches varying soil types is of paramount importance. Warren’s background is supplemented by his hands-on, practical experience including several years of work as a Landscape Contractor and Nurseryman. He has worked with private clients and public agencies such as the LA Metro and California Department of Transportation. His experience includes transportation systems, community and regional parks, residential and commercial developments as well as industrial and institutional complexes. His knowledge of the California ecosystem and understanding of landscape materials and methods has benefited numerous projects. section two | Qualifications of Firm and Assigned Staff 9Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 Bret Hanson, Sr. Landscape Architect (LEED AP)
Bret has over 16 years of experience on various types of landscape architecture projects including; neighborhood parks; public transportation, theme park, multi-family, resort senior living, custom residential, podium, mixed-use facilities, restaurant chains, retail, upscale entertainment venues, and international planning.

Responsibilities include handling all aspects of design, document development, field, and deliverables for his diverse project portfolio. He has been directly accountable for development, coordination, quality control, and submittal of full construction document sets. Through his experiences Bret has worked closely with clients and interdisciplinary design teams in building many successful design projects. As a certified LEED AP , Bret has a passion for implementing sustainable principles and is a former USGBC-OC Board member and President of the Emerging Green Builders of Orange County. Also, through professional and organization experiences Bret has become an accomplished public speaker before community, volunteer, & industry based groups.

Stephanie Kennedy, Landscape Architect
Stephanie is a landscape architect with more than 15 years experience. She has worked extensively with major theme parks, Developers and Architects, and brings exceptional skills in design for a broad range of projects throughout the United States and Asia. Her early work includes community and university campus projects with AECOM, followed by over a decade of work on five different Walt Disney theme parks. In 2018, she moved to King County to pursue her master’s degree in urban planning and design and focus her design efforts on community projects closer to home. Her knowledge of the latest design technology has helped clients clearly and effectively communicate design concepts with the public, municipalities , engineers and contractors.

Matt Britten (CivilPros), Senior Civil Engineer
Matt has over 30 years of experience in general civil, environmental, and transportation engineering. His wide base of experience ranges from complete project management to supervision of engineering work, including hydraulic design and system implementation; hydrologic issues; drainage and erosion control; earthwork; public works; light rail transit and transit facilities; environmental compliance issues; bid documentation and processing; special provisions; cost estimating; scheduling; construction management; and funding allocation.

This work experience involved multiple clients coming from the federal, public, and private sectors. Matt is experienced in providing oversight for CADD operations, evaluation of bids, and engineering support during construction, and prepares technical reports. His recent work includes projects for SANDAG, NCTD, MTS, City of National City, and UPRR and BNSF Railroads.

Chris Haight (Coffman Engineers), PE, SE, Senior Structural Engineer Chris is a Structural Engineer with over 26 years of experience in structural engineering on a wide range of transportation and infrastructure projects, including highways; in the seismic design of structures throughout the Western United States. He has provided structural design for new construction projects, performed structural analysis, seismic strengthning and retrofit of existing structures, led risk assessment progrms for large portfolios, and managed comlex projects requiring oversight and approval from the Division of State Architect and California Department of Health Care Access and Infromation. Chris is well versed in all major construction materials and methods, including concrete, steel, masonry, timber, energy dissipation, and tilt-up construction.

Pablo Amesquita, (Veneklasen) CTS-D, Acoustical / Sound Engineer section two | Qualifications of Firm and Assigned Staff Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 10 section two | Qualifications of Firm and Assigned Staff Aviation Station Apartments
Jim Keenan and Bret Hanson worked as the
landscape architects on the Aviation Station
Apartments, which is a transit-roiented development
with recreation courtyards and an active streetscape.

The recreation areas include a pool deck, game and
lounge areas, outdoor kitchen, and multiple shade
structures
Completed: 2016
References:

Mark Stewart
Vice President of Design at Fairfield Residential
tel: 858.626.8343, email:[email protected]
University Park, Irvine, CA
Jim Keenan, Bret Hanson, and Joe Arias worked
on this addition to University Park in Irvine, CA. The
park gets its name from its proximity to the University of California in Irvine. The park includes a seating
area with large shade structure and play equipment
with fabric shade canopies
Completed: 2006
Client: City of Irvine
Cerano Park, Milipitas, CA
Cerano Park is a 2 acre park for the City of Milpitas as a part of Murphy Ranch development that Jim Keenan
and Bret Hanson worked as landscape architects on. It
provides the community with a basketball court, tennis
courts, shade structure, playground, bathrooms,
parking, BBQs, seating, and open space for family
picnics and outdoor enjoyment.

Completion date: 2010
References:

Mark Stewart - Vice President of Design at
Fairfield Residential
tel: 858.626.8343, email:[email protected]

11Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 Totem Lakes Apartments -
Kirkland, WA
The Totem Lakes Apartments are a mixed-use
development located in Kirkland, WA. AVA’s role on
this project included a streetscape as well as five
recreational courtyards with shade structures on the
upper levels. Jim Keenan, Stephanie Kennedy, and
Bret Hanson worked together on the project.

Completed: 2022
References:

Mark Stewart
Vice President of Design at Fairfield Residential
tel: 858.626.8343, email:[email protected]
Hillside Park, Kirkland, WA
The Hillside Park is a community project adjacent to
the Totem Lakes Apartments and Evergreen Hospital.

This park will provide well-lit and landscaped outdoor
seating and gathering spaces for Totem Lakes
residents and hospital employees. Jim Keenan and
Stephanie Kennedy worked together on the project.

Completed: In progress
References:

Mark Stewart -
Vice President of Design at Fairfield Residential
tel: 858.626.8343, email:[email protected]
Vista Canyon, Santa Clarita, CA
Anil Verma Associates, Inc. (AVA) is contracted by the
city of Santa Clarita through RailPros as a part of team to design a new Commuter Rail Station to fit within
the context of the master planned community of Vista
Canyon. AVA is responsible for station architectural
design, lighting, signage, landscape design, and
mechanical, plumbing, and electrical engineering. AVA
is also the sustainability compliance lead.

Completion date: in progress
References:

Carla Callahan, Sr. Engineer
tel: 661.286.4130
section two | Qualifications of Firm and Assigned Staff Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 section two | Qualifications of Firm and Assigned Staff 12 Goleta Train Depot
AVA is the prime consultant contracted by the City
of Goleta to lead a multi-disciplinary team (including
RailPros) to develop conceptual design and PS&E
for a new Train Depot building to service the existing
AMTRAK platform. AVA is providing architectural,
lighting, signage, landscape design, and Mechanical,
Plumbing, and Electrical engineering design. AVA
is also managing several sub-consultants and
coordinating work with stakeholders/LOSSAN.

Completion date: in progress
References:

Jaime Valdez - DNS Director - City of Goleta
tel: 805.961.7568, email:[email protected]
Via Princessa Park
The City of Santa Clarita is bringing a new
neighborhood park to the City. A key part of this
development is upgrade the existing Via Princessa
Station along the Antelope Valley Line, formally called the Santa Clarita Line. As part of this project, AVA is reviewing the existing restroom facilities (Architectural and MEP) and providing upgrades, designing a new
pedestrian and vehicular crossing, upgrading the Via
existing Princessa Station, and providing lighting and
electrical engineering design for the overall project.

Completion date: in progress
Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension
Project: C700 Line; Track, Stations, &
Systems - A Design-Build Contract
The Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension (SVBX)
Phase 1 project which extends the BART Heavy rail
systems services from Fremont to Berryessa Station
in San Jose, CA. The 10-mile section encompasses
the Milpitas and Berryessa Stations. AVA provided
Architecture, Landscape, Structural, and Electrical
for the Milpitas Station, the Pedestrian Bridge,
Bus Transit Center, Parking Structure, Bike/Bus
Operators Facility, and Wayside Facilities.

Completed: 2020
References:

Rajwinder Sehdev - Senior Architect - VTA
tel: 408.464.7931, email:[email protected]
13Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension,
– Penitencia Creek, San Jose, CA
AVA prepared landscape CDs, specs, and performed
construction support services for a creek/habitat
restoration project. AVA, as part of a design build
team, served as the architect, landscape architect,
and engineer for the stations, street crossings, and
the Upper Penitencia Creek Mitigation project.

Completed: 2014
References:

Rajwinder Sehdev - Senior Architect - VTA
tel: 408.464.7931, email:[email protected]
Hong Kong Disneyland Expansion -
Toy Story Land
Jim, Bret and Stephanie first collaborated on the
Hong Kong Disneyland Expansion. One part of this
project was Toy Story Land, where the landscape
and rides are designed to make the guest feel like
they are toy-sized characters from the movie Toy
Story.

Completed: 2012
Regional Connector Transit
Corridor
AVA is the Architect of Record (AOR), and Landscape
Architect of Record (LAOR), and is assisting with civil engineering in the design of three (3) underground
stations and their plazas in downtown Los Angeles.

The challenge with this design build project is to
design all three underground stations to work within
the urban fabric of their respective neighborhoods
and to meet the desires of the communities
surrounding them, while also supporting existing
buildings and infrastructure.

Completion date: in progress, 2025
section two | Qualifications of Firm and Assigned Staff Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 section two | Qualifications of Firm and Assigned Staff 14 Disney California Adventures - Cars
Land
Jim Keenan worked with Walt Disney Imagineering
on Cars Land in Anaheim, CA’s Disney California
Adventures. This project required close collaboration
with audio and lighting specialists because it’s on the parade route. Jim helped coordinate light and audio
systems, and also contributed his extensive knowledge
of Southern California plants and hardscape materials.

Completion date: 2012
Downtown Disneyland Hotel
Jim Keenan also worked on the Disneyland Hotel in
Anaheim, CA. On this project, part of the challenge
was to make well-designed connections between
other parts of the resort and the surrounding
community. This hotel also focused on guest comfort
Completion date: 2005
Ayodhya Design Competition,
India
Ayodhya is the birthplace of Ram, an important
figure in the Hindu culture. This design competition
challenged participants to create a comfortable,
park-like space where 100,000 visitors per day
could view the various temples, vendors and
visitors’ center. Anil, Somesh, Jim and Stephanie
collaborated on this concept.

Completion date: 2020
15Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 Gateway to LA at LAX
Jim Keenan worked on the iconic 100’ tall light pylons
at LAX as an urban designer and principal in charge.

The goal was to recapture the charm of Los Angeles in
the 1920’s, 30’s and 40’s, when the city emerged as a
horticultural focal point for the world and to celebrate the diverse culture of the City.

Completion date: 2000
Green Valley Ranch, Henderson,
NV
For American Nevada Corporation, Jim Keenan
served as Project Manager for Green Valley Ranch
in Henderson, Nevada. Helped prepare the Master
Overlay District Master Plan, Design Guidelines,
and Development Standards. He developed
several designs and construction packages for
the major landscape framework within the 1,300-
acre, Spanish/Mediterranean-style development.

These packages consisted of the streetscapes,
neighborhood parks, custom housing neighborhood,
information center, and community signage.

Completion date: 1998
Disney’s Animal Kingdom - World of
Avatar
Stephanie Kennedy worked with Walt Disney Imagineering
as a landscape architect on World of Avatar. This part of the park is of course, based on the movie Avatar. Using unique planting palettes, including some “bioluminscent” plants, interactive elements and sound effects, guests
enjoy a truly immersive experience.

Completion date: 2017
section two | Qualifications of Firm and Assigned Staff Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 Section Three
Work Statement
Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 section three | Work Statement
17 PHASE 1 PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION Duration: 1 month TASK 1.1 DEVELOP BASE MAPPING
A. REVIEW / ANALYZE DATA – Review CITY as-built and historical documents and studies . Discuss with CITY staff, so critical information is carried forward. Review CITY tract and parcel maps for right-of-way data. Confirm facility locations and configurations. Provide cursory review of accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California Building Code (CBC)), drainage, utility, and right-of-way issues. Re - view/verify existing and required amenities, look beyond the confines of the scope of work area to see if there are any connections that should be recognized, either vehicular, bike or pedestrian. Identify inconsis- tencies, deficiencies, or any other information necessary to progress the work.

B. SITE RECONNAISSANCE - visit the site to observe and photograph existing conditions and context. Com- pare existing conditions against as-built drawings provided by CITY.

C. CONSULTANT team will review the existing facility assessment and, in collaboration with City Staff, confirm goals and priorities for this Project’s Scope of Work. This will include identifying possible bid alternates.

D. CONSULTANT team will review existing facility signage and propose an update to wayfinding signs.

E. DEVELOP BASE MAPPING – Base Mapping will be prepared using City-provided survey data.

F. CONSULTANT team will initiate contact with the various utilities within the project site to obtain available as- builts and utility maps. During the site visit, visible utility appurtenances will be identified. These features will be checked for consistency with the as-built information obtained from city. Up to two (2) virtual meetings.

OUTPUT: PDF record of all research, site photography, and data collection. Field Reconnaissance notes. Prepa- ration of Utility Matrix showing utilities with facilities at the project and list items received from the various utilities.

PHASE 2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT / COORDINATION / ADMIN Duration: 7 months TASK 2.1 PROJECT AND SUBCONSULTANT MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL Project scope shall be limited to the related items listed in the CITY’s Request for Proposal that included the project overview and outline of proposed improvements. The Project Manager (PM) shall conduct, oversee and manage the performance of the work including
• Coordination of the development of the overall work tasks • Management of the schedule, budget, staff resources
• Reporting work progress and schedule updates to the CITY’s Project Manager • Scheduling, coordinating, and providing minutes of Project Development Team (PDT) meetings.

The Project Development Team shall include, but not be limited to, the City of Santa Clarita and other selected agencies approved by the City of Santa Clarita. Prior to the start of work, CONSULTANT will furnish the sub - consultants the appropriate forms, manuals, and criteria to ensure uniformity of all project documents. CON - SULTANT’s PM will conduct status and review meetings with subconsultants to review their progress, ensure up-to-date information is being used and the appropriate activities are being performed. Subconsultants will submit all reports and plans to the PM for review of conformity with the project scope of work, directives, ap - plicable codes, design criteria, and any other requirements. The PM will meet with the design team on a peri - odic basis to establish design tasks and to determine schedule and budget status. Deliverables will be made through the PM. AutoDesk Revit/AutoCAD is anticipated to be utilized as the main design programs.

CONSULTANT project team and their respective tasks include:
o Anil Verma Associates (AVA) - Architectural, Landscape and Irrigation, MEP, Lighting o Coffman Engineers – Structural Engineering
o CivilPros – Civil Engineering, Wet Utilities, Grading, Drainage o Veneklasen Engineers – Acoustical and Sound Systems
CONSULTANT’s QA/QC Plan will be developed and submitted to CITY for approval as an independent docu- ment. This plan will detail the policies and procedures to ensure that Quality Assurance (QA) procedures are in place and that Quality Control (QC) is performed for each work product and by the design team. Project quality control records will be maintained and provide copies, if requested by CITY.

Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 section three | Work Statement
18 AVA’s Project Manager to provide monthly progress reports with the monthly invoice. The progress reports shall address activities and progress within the recent billing cycle and provide upcoming deliverables and actions.

OUTPUT: Monthly progress reports and invoices. QAP
TASK 2.2 STRATEGY SESSION / PROGRAM DEFINITION
Meet with CITY and project team to understand the site design objectives and opportunities for approval. Es - tablish project Goals and Aspirations with the key project stakeholders (list of which are to be pre‐approved by the Project Manager) and preliminary construction budget from the CITY.

OUTPUT: One Meeting. Prepare meeting agenda and minutes.

TASK 2.3 MEETINGS
Coordinate and attend monthly design meetings with City staff. CONSULTANT’s team shall prepare and pro - vide to CITY, standard meeting notes for discussion related to the scope of services herein. CONSULTANT shall record and document the discussions, decisions and actions agreed to at these meetings. Conduct team meetings with affected Agencies if applicable to review project schedules, concepts, plans, and specifications.

OUTPUT: Six (6) PDT meetings held at CITY’S offices or via conference calls. Prepare meeting agendas and minutes, action items list, and decision log.

TASK 2.4 ASSIST IN PUBLIC OUTREACH MEETINGS
Assist in public outreach meetings as requested by the city. Up to 2 meetings shall be held in order to address comments and questions made by the City’s public.

OUTPUT: Prepare graphic support and attend two (2) outreach meeting.

TASK 2.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL PLAN (QAP) CONSULTANT shall submit a baseline schedule at the start of the work. The baseline schedule will serve as the basis for monitoring and controlling project activities. The schedule shall show the relationship of the project tasks, expected sequence of design, milestone submittals and the effect of any impacts to the overall schedule.

OUTPUT: Baseline Schedule and Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) PHASE 3 PRELIMINARY DESIGN (SD) DOCUMENTS Duration: 2 Months TASK 3.1 CITY AND THIRD PARTY MEETINGS
CONSULTANT team will participate in coordination meetings with the City and third party groups to help prog- ress the design. Up to two (2) virtual meetings.

OUTPUT: Up to two (2) coordination meetings held via conference calls. Prepare meeting agendas / minutes.

TASK 3.2 PRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OPTIONS
CONSULTANT’s team will prepare Schematic Plan Drawings illustrating all components of the Project including the size, scale, location, dimensions, and character of physical systems and equipment and will be in accor - dance with CITY standards, Title 24, and other applicable requirements. CONSULTANT will develop the initial architectural styles for study by providing architectural plan and elevation sketches and comments to aid CITY staff to determine a style for the project. The CONSULTANT team anticipates participation in a strategy ses - sion, indicated in Task 2.2 to understand the site design objectives. In concert with the CONSULTANT team, determine the constraints, opportunities, general capacities or optimum level of development. CONSULTANT’s Structural Engineer will counsel on building form, materials, and structural systems pertaining to suitability of design as related to site conditions, building code requirements, and soils report requirements.

OUTPUT: Prepare preliminary architectural plans, elevations, and sketches.

Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 section three | Work Statement
19 TASK 3.3 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN, SITE LIGHTING, AND WAYFINDING CONSULTANT shall prepare preliminary site plans for the project site and will work closely with CITY Land - scape/Maintenance staff in order to provide a preliminary and final design that meets CITY’s requirements.

Preliminary light intent concepts will be developed.

OUTPUT: Preliminary site plans.

TASK 3.4 PRELIMINARY CIVIL GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND UTILITIES CONSULTANT shall prepare preliminary grading plans for the project site and determine points of connection to existing utilities.

OUTPUT: Preliminary civil grading plans.

TASK 3.5 REVIEW/APPROVAL AND FINALIZE PRELIMINARY DESIGN CONSULTANT will work with CITY’s Engineering and Planning staff to incorporate the agreed upon changes to the design based on CITY comments at a one-stop meeting. Based upon feedback from project stakeholders, CONSULTANT’s team will prepare final conceptual designs and sketches to provide a preferred scheme from which to carry forward CITY’s design goals. All communications with the public or the press will be made by CITY with the CONSULTANT team providing support.

OUTPUT: Comment / Response / Resolution matrix. Finalize preliminary architectural plans and elevations.

TASK 3.6 BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT
CONSULTANT will Provide a written description of materials, components, and systems to be incorporated into the Project. Greenbook Standards and Specifications shall be referenced. A Basis of Design Report will be prepared by CONSULTANT for City & Stakeholder review and approval prior to commencement of project de- sign. Drawings are to be developed on AutoCAD Version 2022 or equivalent and documents shall be prepared utilizing the Microsoft Office Suite (i.e. “Word,” “Excel,” “PowerPoint,” and “Project.”) OUTPUT: Basis of Design Report
TASK 3.7 PRELIMINARY ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE OF COSTS CONSULTANT’s team will prepare a rough order of magnitude for potential construction costs for the project during the preliminary design phase.

OUTPUT: Preliminary Cost Estimate.

PHASE 4 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION (PS&E) Duration: 4 months Upon approval of the preliminary design options by CITY and other agencies, CONSULTANT’s team shall pre- pare design development phase documents and submit them to CITY for 60%, 100%, and final reviews (total 3), including Cost Estimates, and attend review meetings with the City. The object of the Design will be to:
a. Ensure the design development address in every respect the CITY’s review comments b. Advance preliminary design efforts for Plans, Specifications, and Estimate package including required submittals for reports, matrices, and checklists
c. Verify constructability and functional feasibility of the proposed design d. Identify initial construction work window requirements. e. Detail construction phasing plans and identify proposed contractor staging areas. f. Prepare Cost Estimates and materials list.

Based upon the CITY’s comments, perform revisions to the design concept to resolve outstanding issues, re - view input from all team members, and develop a base.

Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 section three | Work Statement
20 TASK 4.1 CITY AND THIRD PARTY MEETINGS
CONSULTANT team will participate in coordination meetings with the City and third party groups to help prog- ress the design. Up to two (2) virtual meetings.

OUTPUT: Up to two (2) coordination meetings held via conference calls. Prepare meeting agendas / minutes.

TASK 4.2 60% COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT PLANS - ENGINEERING A. PRELIMINARY DEMOLITION PLANS – prepare preliminary demo coordination plans for the site.

B. PRELIMINARY CIVIL PLANS - prepare plan drawings for the preferred alternatives and design options.

Drawings will include, but not be limited to sidewalk work, hydrology design, and LID modification. CON - SULTANT team shall provide typical sections.

C. PRELIMINARY FINE GRADING LANDSCAPE DESIGN – prepare preliminary grading and drainage coor- dination plans for landscape and softscape areas for use by the CONSULTANT’s Civil Engineer.

D. PRELIMINARY STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING – Prepare preliminary structural calculations, conceptual foundation plan, and conceptual structural framing plans.

TASK 4.3 60% COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT PLANS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE A. PRELIMINARY HARDSCAPE PLANS and DETAILS - prepare construction plans indicating materials, fin- ishes, colors, and detail call-outs in a schedule.

B. PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLANS and DETAILS - Prepare preliminary tree planting plans and plant pal - ette legends indicating plant varieties, size, quantity, and locations. Prepare planting details.

C. PRELIMINARY IRRIGATION PLAN and DETAILS - prepare irrigation diagram indicating zones, mainline routing, and valve locations. Prepare irrigation details of irrigation elements.

TASK 4.4 60% COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT PLANS - ARCHITECTURAL A. PRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL PLANS / SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS – develop typical architectural footprints and representative elevations illustrating the architectural character of the new roller skating rink structure and shaded seating area, incorporating community aspirations and incorporating art if required.

B. PRELIMINARY LIGHTING PLAN – develop a lighting plan for the roller skating rink and including lighting fixture types and locations. Lighting photometric plan to be prepared in future task (Task 4.6).

C. PRELIMINARY SIGNAGE AND WAYFINDING – based upon a design analysis and strategy outlining the site needs, constraints and context, provide a unified visual language for open space area signage.

TASK 4.5 60% COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT PLANS - GENERAL
A. DRAFT SPECIFICATIONS OUTLINE - prepare 8½” x 11”, typed specifications in the Construction Specifi- cations Institute (CSI) format which describe materials, finishes, and workmanship.

B. OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS - prepare an opinion of probable construction costs based upon the 60% complete drawings. This will be prepared using historical costs from recent projects.

C. SUBMITTAL - submit technical specification and drawings to CITY for review.

OUTPUT: 60% Complete Development submittal including:
• Preliminary Architectural Plans, Sections, Elevations, and Details • Preliminary Construction Plans and Details n Preliminary Planting Plans and Details • Preliminary Irrigation Plans and Details n Preliminary foundation and framing plans • Preliminary Signage and Wayfinding Dwgs n Preliminary Civil Plans and Sections • Preliminary Lighting Plans n Specifications Outline • Opinion of Probable Costs n Preliminary Structural Calculations TASK 4.6 REVIEW / APPROVAL OF 60% DEVELOPMENT PLANS
CONSULTANT will work with the CITY Engineering and Planning staff to incorporate the agreed upon chang- es to the design based on Planning Department comments in a One-Stop meeting.

OUTPUT: Comment / Response / Resolution matrix
Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 section three | Work Statement
21 TASK 4.7 100% AND FINAL COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Based on the approval of the project from the CITY, CONSULTANT and CONSULTANT project team will prepare plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) to the 100% complete level of detail. PS&E’s will be prepared to successfully obtain approvals from all necessary utilities and agencies.

A. DESIGN REFINEMENT - based upon the CITY’s comments, perform revisions to the design.

B. DEMOLITION PLANS – prepare final demolition coordination plans for site development.

C. CIVIL GRADING AND UTILITY DESIGN - civil drawings, details and notes as needed for the demolition of the exiting area, including, but not limited, to grading, drainage, and erosion control. Drawings shall clearly detail all utility crossing and connections in the project area, including underground and overhead. Civil drawings shall be coordinated with the overall site and demonstrate ADA access from parking areas, walks, fire hydrants, fire lanes, and ADA site access routes to ensure code compliance.

D. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS – prepare plans, elevations, and details for rink and seating area E. SITE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, DETAILS, AND TYPICAL SECTIONS - prepare construction plans indi - cating materials, finishes, colors, and detail call-outs in a schedule.

F. PLANTING/IRRIGATION PLANS and DETAILS - prepare labeled planting plans indicating plant varieties, size, quantity, and locations. Prepare planting details of planting elements. Prepare irrigation plans indicat- ing sprinkler heads, drip systems, piping, valves, and controllers. Prepare irrigation details.

G. LID - prepare necessary drawings, details, notes, ad specifications as needed for the construction of and/ or installation of all aspects of the landscape and hardscape as required by LID.

H. LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLANS, DETAILS, AND SCHEDULES - prepare electrical plans, sched - ules, and details indicating building, site and accent lighting.

I. SOUND SYSTEMS – prepare audio and visual systems for new Roller Skating Rink.

J. STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS - prepare structural plans and details related to architectural and site ele - ments. Structural design will include calculations, framing plans, foundation plans, sizing of framing mem- bers, and coordination with other project disciplines.

K. ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS – Electrical power and data plans will be prepared to show the proposed lighting and fixtures, proposed security camera system, and will be used to coordinate with the utility companies. Plumbing plans will be prepared to show fixture sizes and to create overall water demands for the project.

L. SPECIFICATIONS - prepare 8 1/2” x 11”, typed specifications in the CSI format which describe materials, finishes, and workmanship. Provide standard General and Special Conditions of CSI Section 1.

M. QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL – The Project Team will follow CONSULTANT’s Quality Assurance Procedures as set forth in an approved QAP.

N. OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS - prepare an opinion of probable construction costs based upon the final design drawings. This will be prepared with contractor’s input using historical costs. Consultant’s opinions of total project costs and/or construction costs, provided as part of the Services under this Agreement are made on the basis of Consultant’s knowledge, experience and qualifications and represent Consultant’s judgment as a design professional. Consultant does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual total proj- ect costs or total construction costs will not vary from the opinions provided by Consultant.

O. SUBMITTAL - submit technical specification and drawings to CITY for review at the 100% package. One round of revisions will be provided due to CITY comments.

OUTPUT: Submittal of 100% Design Plans, Specifications and Estimates to CITY for Review.

TASK 4.8 REVIEW/APPROVAL OF 100% COMPLETE DESIGN CONSTRUCTION DWGS CONSULTANT’s team will prepare PS&E level construction documents. Each PS&E submittal will be submitted to CITY and select stakeholders for review and comments. Stakeholder review comments at each deliverable will be addressed with responses included with the subsequent deliverable.

OUTPUT: Comment / Response / Resolution matrix.

Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 section three | Work Statement
22 TASK 4.9 BID PACKAGING PREPARATION, QC, AND SUBMITTAL CONSULTANT’s Team will prepare PS&E level construction documents. Each PS&E submittal will be submit- ted to CITY and select stakeholders for review and comments. Stakeholder review comments at each deliver- able will be addressed with responses included with the subsequent deliverable.

OUTPUT: Submit Final Bid Package Submittal. Anticipated deliverables include:
• Meeting Notes and Schedules n Construction Document Final Design • Demolition Plans n Grading and Utility Plans
• Site Construction Plans and Details n Planting Plans and Details • Irrigation Plans and Details n Architectural Plans and Details • Structural Plans and Details n Signage and Wayfinding Drawings • Civil Plans and Typical Sections n Lighting and Electrical Plans and Details • Structural Engineering Calculations n Plumbing Plans and Details • Specifications n Quality Control Documentation upon request • Structural/Elect/Mech Engineering Calculations n Opinion of Probable Costs PHASE 5 BID ASSISTANCE (NIC – optional future services) 1 Month TASK 5.1 PRE-BID SUPPORT
CONSULTANT’s team will support CITY during bidding and continue project controls and reporting as required.

CONSULTANT will participate in stakeholder coordination as needed and manage requests, information, and coordination with our subconsultants. Assistance is not currently part of the scope and excluded at this time.

OUTPUT: Project controls and reporting.

TASK 5.2 PRE-BID MEETING
Attend and participate in the pre-bid meeting.

OUTPUT: Attend one (1) meeting.

PHASE 6 DESIGN SUPPORT UNDER CONSTRUCTION (NIC – optional future services) 12 Months CONSULTANT’s team will support CITY and Construction Manager during construction and continue all project controls and reporting as required. CONSULTANT will attend the Pre-Construction Meeting at CITY, participate in stakeholder coordination as needed, and manage requests, information, and coordination with our subconsul- tants. CONSULTANT will work with CITY to prepare construction bulletins and will attend regular jobsite meetings and perform site observations of the construction. When requested in writing by CITY, CONSULTANT will review and respond to Requests for Information (RFIs), Change Requests (CR), Contractor progress payment requests, or Contract Change Orders (CCO). The project team will review shop drawings and submittals for the project, as requested by CITY. CONSULTANT’s team will complete a final site walk, along with CITY Project Manager or Construction Inspector at substantial completion of construction. CONSULTANT will create a comprehensive list of items needed to be complete to meet all project permit requirements and design objectives.

OUTPUT: Bid Addenda, RFI / Submittal Responses, Field Reports, and Final punch list items to be completed.

TASK 6.1 CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS / SITE VISITS (NIC–optional future services) OUTPUT: Meeting notes and site visit reports
TASK 6.2 REVIEW / RESPOND TO RFIs, SUBMITTALS, SHOP DWGS (NIC–optional future services) OUTPUT: Responses to RFIs, Submittals and Shop drawings via protocol determined by the CITY.

TASK 6.3 SITE PUNCHLIST WALK AND REPORT (NIC – optional future services) CONSULTANT’s team will visit the site upon 95% completion of construction and review the progress. CON- SULTANT shall make a list of outstanding items to be addressed prior to occupancy.

OUTPUT: Report on site conditions, including photographs and closeout punchlist Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 section three | Work Statement
23 PHASE 7 PROJECT CLOSEOUT (NIC – optional future services) 1 Month TASK 7.1 RECORD DRAWINGS AND PROJECT CLOSEOUT (NIC – optional future services) Upon completion of the construction contract, CONSULTANT will prepare record drawings by updating the original project “as- advertised” plan sheets showing changes that occurred during construction. Record drawings will be prepared by transferring the updates from red-marked plans received from CITY and mark- ups recorded by the project team during construction. The record drawings will be completed in the as- advertised project CADD AutoCAD files.

OUTPUT:
• One (1) 11”x17” set of record drawings submittal to CITY and one set of record drawings in PDF format. • One set of record drawing CADD files in AutoCAD 2022 format or equivalent.

ASSUMPTIONS AND OUT-OF-SCOPE ITEMS
The following are assumptions or expressly excluded from the scope of services:

A. PACKAGING - the project is assumed to be designed as one package utilizing CAD or Revit software.

B. FEES - payment of any governmental fees, permits or assessments to be by others.

C. CHANGES - CITY or outside agency changes in program, schedule, consultant team or redesign.

D. SURVEY – Anticipated to be supplied by the City and no additional survey will be required.

E. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION – Not Anticipated.

F. HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS OF EXISTING FACILITIES – Not Anticipated.

G. SWPPP/WATER QUALITY– Not Anticipated
H. GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES - Anticipated to be supplied by the City.

I. SUSTAINABILITY CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION – While the project will be designed with sustain- ability in mind, documentation and submittal is not included in this scope of services.

J. TENANT IMPROVEMENTS – not a part, will be negotiated if out of sequence.

K. CONSTRUCTION-PHASE SERVICES: It is understood and agreed that the design process cannot be completed until the Project which is the subject of this Agreement is actually constructed. Therefore, CITY agrees that, if the services to be provided by CONSULTANT under this Agreement do not include construc- tion-phase services, or, if this Agreement is terminated prior to substantial completion of the Project, CITY will indemnify CONSULTANT and hold CONSULTANT harmless from and against any and all claims, de - mands, losses, costs, liabilities and damages.

L. SCHEDULE – Deliverable timelines set herein are based upon schedules set forth in the CITY’s RFP.

CONSULTANT shall plan to follow milestones set herein but shall not be held responsible for schedule delays caused by stakeholders, construction delays, or other third-party impacts that are outside CONSUL- TANT’s control. Adjusted schedule to be developed.

M. GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS - Consultant shall not be liable for damages resulting from the actions or inactions of governmental agencies. Consultant shall act only as an advisor in any governmental relations.

Consultant’s assistance shall not constitute a representation or guarantee that any permit or approval will be acted upon favorably by any governmental authority.

N. ENTITLED TO RELY - Consultant shall be entitled to reasonably rely without independent verification upon the information and data provided by the City or obtained from generally accepted sources within the indus- try, except to the extent such verification is expressly included or required in the Scope of Services.

O. ACTS OF OTHERS - Consultant shall be responsible for its performance and that of its subconsultnats and vendors but shall not have control over or charge of, and shall not be responsible for, acts of omissions of the City, Contractor, Subcontractor(s), or their agents, employees, or of any other persons or entities per - forming portions of the Project and not engaged by Consultant P. SAFETY - Consultant shall not have control over or charge of, and shall not be responsible for, construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety measures, precautions or programs at the project site, as these are solely the responsibility of the Contractor.

Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 Section Four
Schedule
Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 25 section four | Schedule
Current Scope of Work Future Scope of Work
TASK DESCRIPTION Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NA Project Management/ Coordination/ Admin
Task 2.1 Project and Subconsultant Mgmt and Quality Control Task 2.2 Strategy Session/Program Definition
Task 2.3 Regular bi-weekly team meetings / status ch eck-in Task 2.4 Assist in Public Outreach Meeting
Task 2.5 Monthly Project Status Report & Prepare Inv oices Phase 1 Preliminary Investigation
Task 1.1 Review /Analyze Data
Task 1.2 Site Reconnaissance
Task 1.3 Develop Base Mapping
Task 1.4 Obtain as-builts, utility maps
Task 1.5 Review existing facilities, confirm goals & priorities w/ City Task 1.6 Review existing signage, propose an update
Phase 3 Preliminary Design
Task 3.0 Meetings with City or Third Parties
Task 3.1 Preliminary Design Options
Task 3.2 Preliminary Landscape Plan
Task 3.3 Review/Approval of Schematic Design
Task 3.4 Finalize preliminary design options
Task 3.5 Basis of Design Report
Task 3.6 Preliminary Rough Order of Magnitude of Cos ts Phase 4 Construction Documents (CD)
Meetings with City or Third Parties
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Task 4.1 60% Construction Document preparation
(Land/Civil/Arch/MEP/Strl.)Task 4.2 Meet with City to Review 60% submittal Task 4.3 100% Construction Document preparation
(Land/Civil/Arch/MEP/Strl.)Engineers Estimate (Cost) & Engineering Calcs Task 4.4 Review of Complete CD Package
Task 4.5 Final Bid Ready Construction Document prepa ration Phase 5 Bid Support
Task 5.1 Pre-bid support (Respond to RFIs, prepare A ddenda) Task 5.2 Respond to inquires and prepare Addenda
Phase 6 Construction Support (NIC - Optional Future Services) Task 6.1 Construction meetings / site visits
Task 6.2 Review / respond - RFIs, submittals, shop d rawings Task 6.3 Site punchlist walk and report
Demo Site Irrig/Plant
Task 6.4 Prepare & submit record drawings
LEGEND
AVA Team Timeline & milestone deliverable for the AVA Team City of Santa Clarita City of Santa Clarita Review Meeting / Presentation
City Project No. WCE028
City of Elk Grove
Professional Landscape Architecture Engineering Services for the Civic Center Nature Area Project January 31, 2019
Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 Section Five
Sub-consultants
Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 27 section five | Sub-consultants
RAILPROS / CIVILPROS (Civil Engineering)
CivilPros (a dba of RailPros Holdings LLC) is a full-service Civil Engineering consulting firm located in Riverside, CA, with branch offices in Irvine and San Diego. The firm was established in 2017 as a civil-specific extension of RailPros, with the goal of providing unparalleled professional services. Our multi-disciplinary team of professionals is hand-selected to meet the needs of our clients, including Registered Engineers with decades of experience in Municipal Public Works engineering. Our service offerings include general civil engineering, structural/bridge engineering, traffic engineering and solutions, project management, construction management, hydraulics and hydrology, design review, and staff augmentation. CivilPros have successfully delivered civil engineering services on over 20 on- call contracts for multiple local agencies, such as North County Transit District, MTS, SANDAG, San Diego Gas & Electric SDG&E, and the Cities of Menifee and National City.

Contact information:

RailPros Holdings, LLC
15265 Alton Pkwy, Ste. 140,
Irvine, CA 92618
tel: 714.734.8765
VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES (Acoustical and Sound Systems Engineering) Founded in 1947, Veneklasen Associates is one of the largest and oldest acoustical consulting firms in the world. With a global footprint, spanning several countries, we have been leaders in the field of architectural acoustics, environmental acoustics, audio-visual (AV), information technology (IT), Security, environmental noise and vibration mitigation. Engineering, research, and scientific diversity has been our hallmark. Veneklasen Associates’ project portfolio is very rich with a diverse range of projects like Airports, Hospitals, Hospitality, High-end Residential, Mixed-use, Industrial, Commercial, Education, Museums, Transportation(High speed/Metro/LRT etc), and more.

Contact information:

Veneklasen Associates, Inc.
1711 Sixteenth Street
Santa Monica, CA 90404
Tel: (310) 450-1733
Fax: (310) 396-3424
[email protected]
COFFMAN ENGINEERS (Structural Engineering)
Coffman engineering has delivered services since 1979 and has a nationwide network of 610- employees offering multi-discipline capabilities. Their Orange County office opened in 2017.

Contact information:

Coffman Engineers, Inc
1401 Dove Street, Ste. 240,
Newport Beach, CA 92660
tel: 944.623.9957
Santa Clarita Roller Skating Rink Proposal #ENG-21-22-P3034 28 section five | Sub-consultants
local and commuter bus transit, and bicycle and pedestrian trails in the Santa Clarita Valley, and includes the following components:
development of a new passenger rail station (Metrolink Station) including new railroad track and required signal improvements; center platform (including canopies, mini-high platform, light poles, benches); and a grade separated pedestrian access (overcrossing or undercrossing) to the platform. Our scope of work includes: project management and coordination, railroad design and coordination, station communications design, structural engineering, civil design, fiber optic relocation design, and quality assurance and control.

Completed: Est Comp Date 12/31/2023
References: Carla Callahan, PE - Associate Engineer, City of Santa Clarita
tel: 661.286.4130, email:[email protected]
operations, for each alternative provided. The 10% design included:
• Development of plan and profile drawings
• Roadway geometry
• Analysis of vertical curves & clearances based on City maintenance and emergency vehicle criteria
• Line of sight analysis
• Signing and striping
• Utility research and impact evaluation
• Evaluation of impacts to adjoining parking lot
• Undercrossing design based on SCRRA standards
• Inclusion of Metrolink track expansion,
• Pedestrian access design meeting ADA regulations
• Drainage impacts and evaluation
• Drainage design including sump pump analysis
• Quantity take-offs
• Cost estimates
Completed: Est Comp Date 12/31/2020
References:

Wayne Weber - Parks Planning Manager, City of Santa Clarita tel: 661.286.4961, email:[email protected]
Vista Canyon Multi-Modal Center,
City of Santa Clarita, CA
CivilPros staff is providing engineering for the development of the $35 million Vista Canyon Multi-Modal Transit Center project by the City of Santa Clarita, in partnership with the LA Metro and Vista Canyon Ranch, LLC. Located within the eastern Santa Clarita Valley, the installation of the transit center will involve the relocation of the existing Via Princessa Via Princessa Park Access Study, City of Santa
Clarita, CA
Under a single issued Task Order by the City of Santa Clarita, our staff provided concept design alternatives for vehicle and pedestrian access, to a future sports park being proposed by the City, that crossed an existing railroad track. Concepts included multiple overcrossing and undercrossing alternatives. Access was began from north side of the railroad tracks and then go either over or under the tracks providing access to the proposed park on the south side of the tracks. The study included cost evaluation and impact analysis, including utilities and site CivilPros staff provided final track design, minor OCS and signaling work, slope and drainage improvements, and structural retaining walls for the MTS Blue line tracks (MT1 and MT2) between E. Beyer Blvd Bridge and just south of the San Ysidro Freight Yard main entrance.

This project involved design for track work, minor OCS and signaling work, slope and drainage improvements, and structural retaining walls for the MTS Blue line tracks (MT1 and MT2) between E. Beyer Blvd Bridge and just south of the San Ysidro Freight Yard main entrance.

The total length of trackwork included approximately 2,800 track feet for the MT2 line and approximately 1,800 track feet for the MT1 line.

The slope and drainage improvements covered approximately one acre with slope heights over 30 feet and drainage runs totaling over 1,300 feet.

Completed: 2014 - 2016
References: Gabe McKee - MTS
tel: 619.515.0931, email:[email protected]
Beyer Boulevard Track Rehab and Slope Repair,
Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), San Diego, CA

PLUMB COSTING

WBS LABOR HOURS (AVA) LABOR HOURS (VENEKLASEN) LABOR HOURS (RAILPROS/CIVILPROS) LABOR HOURS (COFFMAN ENGINEERS) NO. Total
Hours
(TEAM)
Total
Hours
(AVA)
Principal-in-Charge
(AVA)
Project Manager
Sr. Landscape Architect
Sr. Landscape Architect
(Irrigation Designer)
Landscape Architect
CAD Technician
Sr. Architect
Architect
Sr. Electrical Engineer
Lighting Designer /
Electrical Designer
Plumbing Designer
Estimator
Total
Hours
Associate/Project
Manager
(Veneklassen)
Associate/Project
Manager
(Veneklassen)
Engineer II
(Veneklassen)
Engineer III
(Veneklassen)
Total
Hours
Civil Principal-in-Charge
(Railpros)
Associate/Project
Manager
(Railpros)
Apprentice II
(Railpros)
Engineer II
(Railpros)
Engineer III
(Railpros)
Total
Hours
Principal Structural
Engineer
Structural
Engineer/Project
Manager
Associate Structural
Engineer
Structural CADD 1
Structural CADD 2
PHASE 1 – Preliminary Investigation

1.1.A-E Site and Project Investigation / Review and Analyze Data 56 32 8 2 8 12 2 0 20 8 10 2 4 2 2

1.1.F Coordination Meetings w/ third parties / Utilities (up to 2) 6 6 4 2 0 0 0

2.1 General Project Mngt, Schedule, Tracking, & Reports 36 14 2 8 4 3 1 3 22 18 4 0

2.2 Strategy Session / Program Definition 10 10 2 4 4 0 0 0

2.3 Progress Team Meetings (up to 6) 36 26 10 2 8 2 2 2 3 3 10 6 4 0

2.4 Assist in Public Outreach/City Council Meetings (x2) 33 33 3 8 4 18 0 0 0

2.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan (QAP) 14 8 4 4 0 6 6 0 PHASE 3.3 – Preliminary Design (SD) Documents

3.1 Meetings with City or Third Parties (Up to 2) 10 10 3 2 3 2 0 0 0

3.2 Preliminary Architectural Plans and Sketches 88 88 4 8 16 60 0 0 0

3.3A Preliminary Site Plan 36 36 2 2 8 24 0 0 0

3.3B Site Lighting and Signage & Wayfinding Program 24 24 2 20 2 10 4 6 0 0

3.4 Prel. Civil Grading, Drainage & Utilities 56 0 0 50 8 32 10 6 2 4

3.5 Comment Resolution and Finalize Prelim Design Option 17 17 2 3 12 0 0 0

3.6 Basis of Design, QA/QC, Document Submittal, and Review 24 24 2 2 8 8 2 2 0 0 0

3.7 Preliminary Rough Order Of Magnitude of Costs 24 24 4 20 0 0 0 PHASE 4.1 & 4.2 – Construction Documents (CD) (60% & 100%)

4.1 Meetings with City or Third Parties (Up to 2) 9 9 2 1 2 2 1 1 0 0 0

SITE ENGINEERING

4.2A Demolition Plans 2 2 2 0 0 0

4.2B-C Civil Grading, Drainage, Utilities 100 2 2 0 0 0 98 16 72 10 0

4.2D Site Structural Plans and Details 198 4 4 0 6 6 188 8 40 60 20 60

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

4.3A Construction Plans and Details 48 48 8 40 0 0 0

4.3B Planting Plans and Details 28 28 4 24 0 0 0

4.3C Irrigation Plans and Details 24 24 24 0 0 0

ARCHITECTURAL, MEP, ACOUSTICAL

4.4A Architectural Plans and Details 165 165 1 2 40 32 90 0 0 0

4.4B Monument / Signage Plans and Details 18 18 2 16 0 0 0

4.4C Lighting Plans, Sound System Design, Elect. Plans & Details 120 120 2 30 8 8 72 39 7 20 12 0 0 Plumbing Plans and Details 84 84 30 54 0 0 0

GENERAL

4.5A Technical Specifications. 70 52 8 8 20 8 8 0 8 8 10 2 8

4.5.B 60% Opinion of Probable Costs 14 14 2 12 0 0 0

4.5.C/4.6 60% Const Doc Submittal/QCQA, and Review 70 48 8 6 6 16 2 4 6 0 6 6 16 4 6 4 2

4.7A-M Revise per City comments and develop 100% Drawings 62 58 6 2 6 4 16 4 8 12 0 0 4 2 2

4.7N 100 % Opinion of Probable Costs 14 14 2 12 0 0 0
PHASE 4.3 – Construction Documents (CD) (Final)

4.8 FINAL Document Submittal and Review 93 29 1 4 4 4 2 8 2 2 2 2 2 56 12 40 4 8 2 2 2 2

4.9 Revise per City Comments and issue Bid Ready Docs 56 50 8 2 8 16 4 8 4 0 0 6 2 2 2 PHASE 5 – Bid Support (NIC) - See below for Estimate
PHASE 6 - Construction Support (NIC) - See below for Estimate PHASE 7 - Project Closeout (NIC) - See below for Estimate 1,645 $138.00 $75.00 $72.00 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $60.00 $65.00 $47.50 $45.00 $85.00 $91.00 $74.00 $66.00 $56.00 $87.50 $81.00 $32.75 $30.05 $50.00 $2,070 $9,375 $3,024 $5,150 $5,000 $11,800 $20,880 $2,015 $4,940 $4,095 $3,740 $91 $1,406 $1,716 $672 $0 $7,614 $131 $4,628 $1,500 $4,050 $9,600 $11,020 $3,000 $8,840 1,121 15 125 42 103 100 118 348 31 104 91 44 57 1 19 26 12 282 0 94 4 154 30 242 18 60 76 20 68 $395 $215 $206 $143 $143 $286 $172 $186 $136 $129 $243 $260 $212 $189 $160 $248 $230 $93 $85 $142 $225 $160 $145 $150 $130 ITEM(S) Unit of
Measure QTY UNIT PRICE
Printing and Reproduction Each 80 $20.00
Other Soils Lab 2 $250.00
Vehicle Expenses
Mileage Miles 500 $0.58 $290.00 OVERHEAD @ 1.6 , PROFIT @ 10% $206,175 OVERHEAD @ 1.6 10% $6,838 OVERHEAD @ 1.58 , PROFIT @ 10% $39,371 OVERHEAD @ 0 , PROFIT @ 0% $36,510 Delivery Services Each 4 $50.00 $200.00 1,121 57 282 242 FIRM'S TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES $2,590 FIRM'S TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES $0 FIRM'S TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES $500 FIRM'S TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES $200 PRIME SUBCONSULTANT 8.0% $547.01 SUBCONSULTANT 8.0% $3,149.66 SUBCONSULTANT 8.0% $2,920.80 SUB-TOTAL ESTIMATED COST (AVA) $208,765 TOTAL EST. COST (Veneklasen) $7,385 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST (CivilPros) $43,020 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST (Coffman) $39,631 PM $26,030 Arch $97,040 Landscape $30,081 Electrical / Lighting $25,611 Plumbing $16,717 Estimator $10,696 Sound $6,838 Civil $39,371 Structl $36,510 Reimbursables $3,290 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST DURING DESIGN, PS&E, AND IFB WITH $25,000 ADDITIONAL OWNER'S DISCRETIONARY ALLOWANCE $323,800$25,000

TOTAL HOURS
BILLING RATE ($/HR)

SANTA CLARITA ROLLER SKATING RINK PROJECT
Date: Revised March 28, 2022
Total Hours
Phase 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 – Investigation, PM, Schematic, and PS&E Contract No. :

RFP No. ENG-21-22-P3034
Total Hours
DIRECT RATE ($/HR)
TOTAL DIRECT FEES ($)
$298,800

CIVIL ENGINEERING
PHASE 2 – Project Management/ Coordination/ Administration ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TASK DESCRIPTION:

TOTAL ESTIMATED COST DURING DESIGN, PS&E, AND IFB

TOTAL PRICE
$1,600.00
$500.00
$2,590.00

SUB-TASK DESCRIPTION
Total Hours

EXPENSES

ELECTRICALARCHITECTURELANDSCAPEPROJ MANAGEMENT
COMMENTS/ASSUMPTIONS:
1) PACKAGING - the project is assumed a single package. 2) AGENCY FEES - payment of any governmental fees, permits or assessments not included.
3) SITES OR LEED CERTIFICATION - Not Included
COMMENTS/ASSUMPTIONS:
1)
COMMENTS/ASSUMPTIONS:
1) Civilpros Providing Civil Engineering
2) FIELD SURVEYS, TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING & R/W
ANALYSIS – not anticipated and existing surveys intended to be sufficient. Supplementary surveys can be provided COMMENTS/ASSUMPTIONS:
1) Veneklasen is providing audio visual design
COMMENTS/ASSUMPTIONS:
1) Coffman Providing Structural Engineering
2) City providing Geotechnical evaluation.

COMMENTS/ASSUMPTIONS:
1) Scope covers Sound System Design

PLUMB COSTING

WBS LABOR HOURS (AVA) LABOR HOURS (VENEKLASEN) LABOR HOURS (RAILPROS/CIVILPROS) LABOR HOURS (COFFMAN ENGINEERS) NO. Total
Hours
(TEAM)
Total
Hours
(AVA)
Principal-in-Charge
(AVA)
Project Manager
Sr. Landscape Architect
Sr. Landscape Architect
(Irrigation Designer)
Landscape Architect
CAD Technician
Sr. Architect
Architect
Sr. Electrical Engineer
Lighting Designer /
Electrical Designer
Plumbing Designer
Estimator
Total
Hours
Associate/Project
Manager
(Veneklassen)
Associate/Project
Manager
(Veneklassen)
Engineer II
(Veneklassen)
Engineer III
(Veneklassen)
Total
Hours
Civil Principal-in-Charge
(Railpros)
Associate/Project
Manager
(Railpros)
Apprentice II
(Railpros)
Engineer II
(Railpros)
Engineer III
(Railpros)
Total
Hours
Principal Structural
Engineer
Structural
Engineer/Project
Manager
Associate Structural
Engineer
Structural CADD 1
Structural CADD 2

SANTA CLARITA ROLLER SKATING RINK PROJECT
Date: Revised March 28, 2022
Contract No. :

RFP No. ENG-21-22-P3034
CIVIL ENGINEERING ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TASK DESCRIPTION:

SUB-TASK DESCRIPTION

ELECTRICALARCHITECTURELANDSCAPEPROJ MANAGEMENT
PHASE 5 – Bid Support (NIC)

5.1 Pre-Construction Meeting 8 4 2 2 0 4 2 2 0

5.2 Respond to Inquiries / Prepare Addenda / Bid Sheet 116 68 8 8 12 24 12 4 6 6 44 4 16 24 4 2 2 PHASE 6 - Construction Support 0

6.1 Construction Meetings (12 onsite) 146 102 20 16 36 18 12 0 28 4 24 16 8 8

6.2A Submittal Reviews (limit to 12 reviews) 124 88 8 4 20 40 16 7 4 3 24 24 12 12

6.2B Requests for Information 152 100 20 16 40 20 4 4 4 40 40 12 12

6.2C Contract Design Modifications 42 42 12 20 10 0 0 0

6.2D Schedule, Tracking, Invoicing, & Reports (12 Months) 18 14 2 12 0 4 4 0

6.3 Site Punchlist Walk and Report 28 28 8 8 6 6 0 0 0
PHASE 7 - Project Closeout (NIC - Optional Future Services)

7.1 Project Record Drawing Preparation 54 36 4 32 0 14 2 12 4 2 2 688 $138.00 $75.00 $72.00 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $60.00 $65.00 $47.50 $45.00 $85.00 $91.00 $74.00 $66.00 $56.00 $87.50 $81.00 $32.75 $30.05 $50.00 $276 $7,050 $288 $3,000 $2,200 $0 $10,200 $0 $3,420 $1,170 $850 $0 $1,036 $198 $0 $0 $1,296 $0 $3,125 $1,900 $0 $1,600 $4,930 $0 $520 482 2 94 4 60 44 0 170 0 72 26 10 17 0 14 3 0 158 0 16 0 104 38 48 0 10 34 0 4 $395 $215 $206 $143 $143 $286 $172 $186 $136 $129 $243 $260 $212 $189 $160 $248 $230 $93 $85 $142 $225 $160 $145 $150 $130 ITEM(S) Unit of
Measure QTY UNIT PRICE
Printing and Reproduction Each 50 $20.00 OVERHEAD @ 1.6 , PROFIT @ 10% $81,378 OVERHEAD @ 10% $2,172 OVERHEAD @ 1.58 , PROFIT @ 10% $17,940 OVERHEAD @ 0 , PROFIT @ 0% $7,050 Mileage Miles 800 $0.58 482 1.6 17 158 48
Delivery Services Each 6 $50.00 FIRM'S TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES $1,764 FIRM'S TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES $0 FIRM'S TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES $250 FIRM'S TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES $250 SUBCONSULTANT 0% $0.00 SUBCONSULTANT 8.0% $173.75 SUBCONSULTANT 8.0% $1,435.17 SUBCONSULTANT 8.0% $564.00 SUB-TOTAL ESTIMATED COST (AVA) $83,142 TOTAL EST. COST (Veneklasen) $2,346 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST (CivilPros) $19,625 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST (Coffman) $7,864

TOTAL PRICE
Phase 5 / 6 / 7 – Bid, DSDC, and Closeout
DIRECT RATE ($/HR)
TOTAL DIRECT FEES ($)

TOTAL HOURS
$1,764.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST DURING BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION $112,977 $464.00 Total Hours Total Hours Total Hours
$300.00
$1,000.00
BILLING RATE ($/HR)

EXPENSES