PARTI TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
#BS-20-21-20 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES FOR THE
BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION
odal Center (A
MARCH 29, 2
NOT FOR CONSTRUC PROCRESS
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
March 9, 2021
SFA
Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.
March 9, 2021
City of Santa Clarita, Purchasing
ATTN: Danielle Marquez
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 120
Valencia, CA 91355
Subject: PART I TECHNICAL PROPOSAL #BS-20-21-20 Contractual Services for the City of Santa Clarita's Building & Safety Division
Dear Ms Marquez:
Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc. (SFA) appreciates the opportunity to submit this Proposal to the City of Santa Clarita to provide Building Plan Check Services. We have accessed all Addendums to the RFP and acknowledge having read them.
This Proposal will outline in detail how SFA meets and exceeds all of the City's needs for Plan Review Scope, Experience and Qualifications in the RFP. SFA exclusively serves municipalities to avoid any conflicts of interest and specializes in plan review to maintain the highest quality services in the industry. Our goal and track record is, and has been, to meet the needs of our client agencies as an extension of our client Building Safety Divisions through timely performance, organized systems, quality control, high staff morale, teamwork, and highly credentialed, experienced and trained staff.
SFA's owner and manager, Scott Fazekas is authorized to sign this Proposal and will personally commit to providing services which will meet and exceed the City's expectations.
The terms covered in this Proposal are valid for 90 days as requested in the RFP. SFA hopes to be considered to provide building plan review services and which will allow us the opportunity to show you what a valuable asset SFA can be to the City of Santa Clarita.
Sincerely,
SCOTT FAZEKAS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Lette
Scott R. Fazekas, ATA, NCARB, CBO, LEED AP, CASP
President
9 Corporate Park, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92606-5173 • 949/475-2901 • FAX 949 / 475-2560 • [email protected] Ar: Equa! Opportunis Employer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1
SECTION 2 PROJECT ANALYSIS 1-2
SECTION 3 OBJECTIVE/SCOPE 3
SECTION 4 WORK PROGRAM 3-4
SECTION 5 METHODOLOGY 5-8
SECTION 6 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 8
SECTION 7 ASSIGNED PERSONNEL 8-10
SECTION 8 SCHEDULE 11
SECTION 9 PROGRAM MONITORING 12
SECTION 10 CITY RESOURCES 12
SECTION 11 SUBCONTRACTORS 13
SECTION 12 CAPABILITY AND REFERENCES 13-17
SECTION 13 ALTERNATE PROPOSAL 17
SECTION 14 CONFLICT OF INTEREST 17
SECTION 15 ADDITIONAL DATA 18
RESUMES 19-27
APPENDIX: CITY FORMS
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION
ABOUT THE COMPANY
Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc. (SFA) is a California Corporation founded by Scott Fazekas in June 1996. We are located at 9 Corporate Park, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92606. It was formed to offer building safety services exclusively to governmental agencies. Mr. Fazekas started and managed identical services for a consulting firm over the 11 years prior to forming SFA, with 12 years of prior municipal building safety experience as a City employee. He began his building safety career 48 years ago in 1972 with the City of Newport Beach Building Department.
SFA appreciates our client's concern for high quality performance and precise communication when utilizing the services of a consultant. Close interaction with the client is considered an essential part of our consulting services. Our commitment to a thorough understanding of the codes and the intent with which they were written permits consistent and proper enforcement while meeting the expectations of the City and earning the respect of the public.
All of SFA's plan check staff are licensed Structural Engineers or Civil Engineers which allows SFA the ability to assign the challenging projects to any one of our engineering staff.
This expertise permits SFA the ability to balance our workloads and meet obligations without overloading any one engineer.
SECTION 2 PROJECT ANALYSIS
KEY AGENCY NEEDS
The entire Proposal addresses all the components that as a whole make SFA a high quality solution to the City's needs. Some of the following are highlights which we feel are specifically germane to the RFP.
: Exclusively serving municipalities for zero conflict of interest.
Fast turnaround times: 10 working days for initial review; 5 working days for rechecks. Large projects as agreed upon with City but not to exceed four weeks.
Paper or Electronic plan submittal and review options.
Small Business Certified by State of California GSA
Experience of individual plan check staff in this field.
Municipal experience in building departments familiarity with all internal & external agency and division needs.
Excellent references by numerous municipalities.
E-mail of correction lists to City for timely communication.
Quality Control measures practiced to insure a quality work product. -1-
Seet Fazchas & Associates, Une.
SFA incorporates several internal procedures which will: 1) insure better communication with our client agencies and the applicants; 2) achieve plan reviews which are more consistent with the specific policies and needs of our clients; and 3) enhance internal organization and processing.
Philosophy
Through our experience in providing contract services to governmental agencies, SFA has identified concepts and ideas that are essential for a consultant to possess in order to effectively fulfill the building department requirements of a city or county. They are as follows:
• The experience and staff to respond to each agency's needs in a timely, efficient and cost effective manner.
• Administrative and management ability of high caliber to identify problem areas and provide for their correction in a timely and sure manner.
The ability to recognize and develop the attributes and strengths of staff members and to utilize them to their full potential.
A reputation for quality performance and integrity to successfully administer all aspects of the codes.
Expectations and performance accountability that are established and adhered to.
Professional representation on behalf of the client agency in order to maintain good public relations.
Communication with the assigned client agency liaison through meetings, memorandums and status reports.
Coordination with other agencies which require Building Department involvement.
• Attendance of key meetings to keep informed on the most recent code administration techniques and procedures.
• Attendance at any required meetings, connected with the plan review or building official services.
A does not perer ang or for the prevajector so me enre or in tres can resulte Financial Stability
SFA was founded in 1996 by Scott Fazekas as a California Corporation. There have never been any partners or investors. SFA operates on a cash basis with zero debt. SFA has never required a credit line for payroll or any other expense. We have operated without loans through the 2008- 2009 recession and during the recent COVID conditions. We have not borrowed from the bank or taken any PPP funds. SFA has operated efficiently and responsibly. Scott Fazekas has, and will be, actively involved with insuring that quality services are delivered to City of Santa Clarita, and will be the primary contact for all communication with the City. -2-
Scott Bazolas & Associates, lee.
SECTION 3 OBJECTIVE/SCOPE
PROJECT APPROACH
The project approach will be to provide the highest quality plan review for the City of Santa Clarita, by applying our tenured, seasoned, well trained and credentialed plan check engineering staff to each plan sent to SFA for review. While this seems like a simple statement, in order to do this, SFA maintains top quality engineers specifically trained and experienced in building safety plan review by providing stability, pride in their work product, compensation, great office space conditions, organized and highly qualified administrative support staff and a family team environment. SFA values employees with long tenure as the consistency and quality of their work product increases with time. All of our staff take pride in the team of which they are a part.
We do not use part-time moonlighting staff who fill in to make extra money and may not be available to talk to or meet with applicants during the workday. We do not have multiple offices to which plans are farmed out. We have employees that have specialized in plan review for over 18 years to as many as 40 years each. SFA's business model has been to focus on building plan review and to maintain a single office location with tenured staff. Scott Fazekas is the sole owner and personally acts as the Liaison for all City needs and continues to have a technical role in plan review; daily interacting with all staff.
SECTION 4 WORK PROGRAM
OVERALL PROCESS
Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc. (SFA) proposes to provide start to finish comprehensive plan review services as-needed when assigned by the City of Santa Clarita. All of our plan staff are located in our Irvine office. Plans will be picked up from City Hall with 24 hours of notification when in paper format, or will receive the plans electronically when notified by the City when they send a link and the application paperwork.
During the review process, once the initial review or resubmittal is plan checked, the plans (paper or electronic format) are sent with plan review comments to the applicant with an electronic copy of the Correction List directly to the City's Building Official and any other desired, designated staff. Also, as an extra service, SFA will copy the Owner with the Correction List as a courtesy. This is discussed further in the Methodology Section Page 7 titled Owner- Notification. SFA's plan check engineers are available to the applicants by phone, e-mail, in person or virtual meeting via Zoom to discuss any questions prior to resubmittals.
When the applicant and/or design team have resolved corrections through the resumbittal and recheck process and have shown compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, state and federal laws and City Policies and Interpretations, SFA will return a Transmittal with 2 sets of approved plans, stamped and signed by SFA, to the City in either paper or electronic format as required. A copy for the Assessor is also included when appropriate depending on the project scope. -3-
Scott Fazekes Associates, Inc.
The Scope of Review provided by SFA covers all the codes mandated for enforcement by the Building Department and are listed as follows:
California Building Code, 2019 Edition (And whatever Edition goes into effect as mandated by State Law)
California Mechanical Code, 2019 Edition
California Plumbing Code, 2019 Edition
California Electrical Code, 2019 Edition
California Energy Code, 2019 Edition
California Residential Code, 2019
All California Adopted Codes
City Grading Ordinance
All California Statutes which mandate local enforcement All related State and Local Codes adopted by the City of Santa Clarita, as well as future adopted codes and ordinances during the term of the contract term City Policies
City Interpretations
Additional Scope Provided by SFA
SFA has three (3) CASp professionals on staff. The Certified Access Specialist shows a level of competency in not only California Access Regulations, but in both federal and state laws and how both citizens and the City are affected.
Preliminary meetings either virtually or Zoom, at City Hall or on the job site are offered by SFA. These meetings are offered at no additional cost to the City.
Phone consultations are available to the City on any topic, regardless of whether or not it's for a project worked on by SFA. Code issues are addressed as a courtesy with no charge.
SFA's Office
All of SFA's plan review services are based in our Irvine office. Having all of our staff in one office location enhances quality control through:
Creating a team information sharing environment,
Single location of all staff for meetings to train and discuss uniformity Central location for tracking plans, entering data, typing Corrections, handling phones
• No sharing of plan assignments occurs by shipping to other district offices -4-
Seott Fazeias & Associates, ine.
SECTION 5 METHODOLOGY
COMMUNICATION WITH APPLICANTS
SFA has multiple mediums with which to communicate with applicants during the process. The method selected is intended to be the most convenient, timely, efficient, inclusive to all relevant parties, and which medium the design team has available to them. SFA lists the communication tools currently being utilized in our daily operations:
Zoom meetings
2. Conference call dial-ins
Combination of Blue beam shared on-line viewing with conference call to discuss plans.
4. On-site meetings
Meeting attendance at City Hall
6. Phone
Fax
8. E-mail and pdfs
Considerations such as the location(s), number of participants, complexity of the subject and even personality of the contacts plays a role in how our method of interaction is selected.
Plan Assignment/Routing
When plans are received either initially or for recheck, the plans are promptly routed to the plan check engineer with an assignment tag and the due date, so the engineer can schedule their time accordingly. All plan check engineers are paid hourly instead of salaried so they receive pay for all overtime at a rate of 1.5 times regular payroll. No pre-approval is required. This overtime pay system allows them to put in extra time when needed in order to always meet the deadline.
A Daily Turnaround Report is run and reviewed by management to verify that all deadlines have been met or exceeded. By assigning work to the engineers quickly, offering automatic overtime pay and reviewing performance reports, SFA consistently meets our deadlines and will do so for the City of Santa Clarita.
Plan Review Document Verification
The plan reviews also consist of checking the Application against the plans to verify accuracy and consistency of the description, valuation, square footage, construction type, use, and occupancy. In order for the plan checks to reflect the City's specific administrative preferences, policies, interpretations and routing protocols, SFA will customize a City of Santa Clarita Correction List Text which insures that specific requirements are not missed. SFA will also maintain a summarized outline of the city's Ordinance requirements and administrative policies that each plan check engineer references. It can be amended at any time by the Building Official by an e-mail or phone call. This enhances plan reviews that are consistent and in accordance with directives of the City's Building Official.
-5-
Seatt Fazekas & Associates, ine.
Correction List Format
To enhance fairness to the designer with the Correction List, the format is such that upon recheck, all the corrections which are resolved by the designer's response are deleted/dropped from the list; only the unresolved items remain. The initial corrections that are unresolved remain in light font for reference with the follow-up correction clarification as to what remains outstanding and why, is typed in bold font. This lets the designer (and owner) see that it is not a new correction that was added but was simply not resolved by the designer, and why.
Electronic Tools
Some of the key elements which are relied upon for a plan review operation are 1) Plan Check oftware and hardware, 2) Plan Correction List development and distribution, 3) Municipa 'ermit System data, 4) Courier and UPS tracking, 5) e-mail correspondence with the City and applicants, and 6) the Plan Log Program and 7) on-line access to client software.
SFA has (5) five electronic plan review stations. Each has dual 43" screens with 4K resolution. Bluebeam Revu is our primary software which the plan check engineers prefer to use. Adobe Reader is also available. We also have a digital security stamp through Bluebeam which uses Sectigo Security to allow us to lock plans to prevent tampering. SFA can accept plans from any City format by simply providing us a link to download into our system.
2) Our plan check correction lists are typed using Microsoft Word and the Correction lists are sent via e-mail to the City and applicants.
Municipal permit tracking systems used by cities for which we do electronic plan reviews have been Bluebeam, Accela, E-Plan Soft Review (EPR) Sire and EnerGov.
SFA's Administrative Section has a computer tracking station exclusively for UPS accounts. Status of plan deliveries and time, dates and individuals who signed for plans is easily accessed.
All e-mail correspondence is sent in either electronic file or as pdf format depending on the document type and City preference using Microsoft. When required in another format, it can be saved in another requested format before sending. 6) SFA has developed a sophisticated Plan Log System that tracks plans, lists Application and Correction data, develops invoicing, and provides reports for performance data. 7) When requested by a client, SFA has been granted licenses by the City to allow us to access the City's database and to review the plans in their system.
SFA has an on-line plan review status tool on our website for access by the City and Applicant. Our Correction Lists communicate how it can be accessed as a convenience. -6-
Scott Fazekas & Associates, lue.
Hold Form Policy
Plan review is an essential function in the City's role of establishing compliance with minimum codes, regulations and ordinances but must be balanced with a customer service attitude that establishes a helpful and constructive attitude by the plan check staff in attaining plan approval. When a plan check submittal response is not entirely complete or ready for . approval but the remaining items are relatively minor, SFA's HOLD Form allows us to update the City of the Corrections but lets the City know that we have called, notified and are working with, the design team on minor items that can be resolved by slip-sheeting, attaining missing signatures, resolving calculations, etc... The applicant and designer are always appreciative of this personalized level of service which avoids delays by additional plan routing or having to resubmit and wait their turn in line after another resubmittal. This is one of the ways that SFA puts forth the effort to make our client, the City of Santa Clarita, look good.
This also lets the City see that our turnaround time is met since the HOLD Form shows that the review was done on time but had corrections. The applicant views it as assisting them in fast- tracking their job.
Owner Notification Policy
SFA has recently implemented a new idea with one of our client agencies that is a departure from conventional Building Safety protocol but is innovative in enhancing the professional image of the City to the property owners. SFA will provide this service for the City of Santa Clarita, if Management so desires.
If using the Owner Notification, the applicant is required to provide the owner's contact information on the Application, including e-mail address. When SFA sends out the Correction List to the applicant or design professional, the owner is also provided a copy. It is prefaced with a statement on the e-mail that no action is required by the owner but that the information is provided as a courtesy at the request of the City's Building Official to keep them informed on the progress of their project. The language in this e-mail is subject to the City's approval.
Often, the design team uses the "City" which includes the "Consultant", as the scape goat. They often make excuses to their client for their schedule and workload which delay resubmittals or cause the resubmittals to be incomplete, just to be able to tell their client that they've resubmitted. The owner will see the dates of Correction Lists and the follow-up comments and items that have not been resolved and why. Having the owner engaged should in theory, reduce the number of rechecks needed, facilitating earlier approval, and will reduce or avoid blame being directed at SFA or the City. This, as with the HOLD Form, is another way SFA provides tools to enhance the City's image to their community.
-7-
Scott Fazekas & Associates, Anc.
Applicant Questionnaires
SFA provides Applicant Questionnaire at the time of initial review for the design/developer team to complete after the review process is complete. This allows follow-up of any potential process issues but also lets the plan check team know they're open to receiving comments. SFA only implements this when requested by the City, as cities often have their own-quality control measure preferences.
SECTION 6 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Scott Fazekas is the owner and President of SFA. He is actively involved with all staff and is the primary contact between City staff and SFA staff, insuring that alll of the City's needs and expectations are met.
All plan check engineers are experienced in comprehensive plan reviews and handles each plan review as their own project manager. All plan check engineers communicate and consult with other staff for consistency or when an individual has specialized expertise in a special technical subject. All of the administrative staff are cross-trained in all functions of phones, filing, word processing, providing project status, logging and routing plans, etc...
SECTION 7 ASSIGNED PERSONNEL
Name Qualifications Type of Review Work
Principal/Project Manager
Scott R. Fazekas, President Registered Architect, CA, NCARB Building & Structural AIA, NCARB, CBO, CASP Colorado, Nevada Plumbing,
LEED AP Certified Plans Examiner ICC/ Mechanical, Electrical Calbo T24 Energy,
Certified Building Inspector, ICC/ Accessibility
Calbo
LEED Accredited Professional, LEED
Certified Access Specialist (CASp) DSA
Certified Building Official, ICC
Scott Fazekas, as Principal and Project Manager will be responsible for the administration of services and seeing that services are tailored to the specific needs of the Agency. He has managed consulting plan check and building safety services for over 36 years. He will also two cities and stays abreast of changing regulatory trends. -8-
Scott Fazeias d Associates, dae.
Associates
Name Qualifications Type of Review Work
Ganesh Rao, S.E. Registered Structural Engineer, Building & Structural CA Plumbing,
Registered Professional Engineer, Mechanical, Electrical CA T24 Energy,
Certified Plans Examiner, ICC/ Accessibility
Calbo
Mr. Rao has diverse design experience of wood, concrete and steel in low, mid and high-rise structures of varying occupancy groups. Now focused in plan review he brings a thorough knowledge of current structural code provisions. He has worked for SFA for 21 years.
Vic Penera, S.E. Registered Structural Engineer, Building & Structural CA Plumbing,
California Structural Engineers Mechanical, Electrical
Association of Southern California T24 Energy,
American Society of Civil Engineers; Accessibility
International Conference of Building
Officials
Vic Penera had been with the City of Los Angeles Building Safety for the majority of his career with experience in both plan review and supervision. He has worked for SFA for 20 years.
Brett Archibald, P.E. Registered Civil Engineer, Building & Structural CASP CA Plumbing,
Certified Plans Examiner, Mechanical, Electrical
ICC T24 Energy,
Certified Mechanical Inspector, ICC Accessibility
International Code Council
American Society of Civil Engineers
Build it Green Certification, CA
Certified Access Specialist, CASp
Brett Archibald has 15 years experience in residential and commercial plan review. -9-
Seeit Fazekas & associates, ine.
Name Qualifications Type of Review Work
Peter Tang, P.E. Licensed Civil Engineer, CA Building & Structural Plumbing,
Mechanical, Electrical
T24 Energy,
Accessibility
Peter Tang joined SFA after having spent sixteen years in structural design. His expertise in wood-framed structures and rack design has made him a valuable resource. Peter has 18 years experience in residential and commercial plan review.
Scott Beery, P.E. Registered Professional Engineer, Building & Structural Plumbing,
Certified Plans Examiner, Mechanical, Electrical
ICC T24 Energy,
Accessibility
Scott Beery has 15 years of municipal plan review experience. His structural design experience has covered residential, schools and a variety of commercial structures including timber, steel concrete and masonry construction materials.
Kyle Tonokawa. P.E. Registered Civil Engineer, Building & Structural Plumbing
Certified Access Specialist Mechanical, Electrical
CASp T24 Energy,
Accessibility
Kyle Tonokawa joined SFA in 2018. He has plan checked and approved plans, design calculations and reports for various commercial and residential buildings and developments for compliance with the California Building Code, State Title 24 Accessibility, ADA and Energy requirements. He has 33 years of combined experience with L.A. City, Anaheim and Irvine Randy Buck, Electrical IAEI Professional Member Electrical Review Engineering
Randy Buck provides specialized electrical plan review for all types of commercial and industrial and residential buildings. He worked as Chief Electrical Inspector and then Chief Inspector in the City of Costa Mesa and now works for SFA reviewing Electrical plans and consulting with the plan check staff on electrical code. Mr. Buck is a past President, International Association of Resumes are at the end of the Proposal.
-10-
Seet Fazelas & issociates. Inc.
SECTION 8 SCHEDULE
TURNAROUND TIME
The proposed turnaround times would be:
Plan Check Services Maximum Timeframe for Delivery
Major Plan Check: 10 Business Days
e.g. multi-family residential, commerical and
other non-residential project
Subsequent & resubmitted plan checks; new 5 Business Days single family house; and simple tenant
improvements for non-residential buildings.
Minor Plan Check: 10 Business Days
e.g. room additions for single family house;
detached structures, and re-roofing
Grading Plan Check for new construction 10 Business Days Subsequent or resubmitted grading plan 5 Business Days
checks
Other Services As agreed upon case-by-case
Accounting & reporting As needed by City
Return of Phone Calls 2-4 hours
Unique projects that would be unusually complex and large in scale would be as agreed upon in advance with the City.
SFA has worked with our client cities on numerous projects which required preliminary meetings, condensed schedules, phased reviews and tight goals on permit issuance deadlines. -11-
Scott FaveRas & Associates, Inc.
SECTION 9 PROGRAM MONITORING
SCHEDULING AND TRACKING
SFA's plan log program has been specifically written to manage every step of the plan review process for SFA. Some of the specific program features are flawlessly tracking both routin nd review status. It features the ability to provide status reports, statistical reports, performanc and management reports. This is available to the City as requested. Our Reports show:
Dates received, reviewed, checked, notified and shipped. Also how shipped. : Tracking status by UPS or Courier
Plan Check Engineer's name, contact information, where and how to respond and resubmit for recheck
Correction Lists
Special Notes to flag unique project-specific items.
SFA also has a condensed Report on our website which is available to the City and Applicants by which the status of a project can easily be checked.
Every work day by mid-day a report which was run the previously night of work due is checked to see if the plans due out that day have had a correction list typed or approved status given. If any plan due out is still not accounted for the plan checker is asked to see if he has this proiect completed so as not to miss any deadlines. We also do a weekly report internally that reviews the completion and due dates of all active projects completed during that week to insure that all deadlines were met.
SECTION 10 CITY RESOURCES
CITY ROLE/TIME INVOLVEMENT
It is the ultimate goal of SFA to make the effort by City staff to be zero, or at least very minimal regarding the start-to-finish plan review process. The City uses a consultant to relieve the City of that plan check assignment. Since SFA works at the pleasure and direction of the City, the City has the right to determine what, if any, involvement they have. SFA is simply an extension of the City staff as an as-needed resource. Some information that would help AFA perform plan review services more efficiently would be as follows:
The specific information and effort required of the City to perform services efficiently would be as follows:
1. Copies of Code Adoption Ordinance.
2. Copies of any written Policies on Code Interpretations.
3. Copies of any administrative policies on plan routing with applicants.
4. List of City contacts, roles, phone numbers, etc... to allow efficient interfacing for communication and coordination between SFA and City staff. -12-
Scott FazeRas & Associates, inc.
SECTION 11 SUBCONTRACTORS
SFA will not outsource plan review to any subconsultants.
SECTION 12 CAPABILITY & REFERENCES
Three (3) Recent unique large scale projects reviewed by SFA Amazon Fulfillment Center - Beaumont, CA
The Amazon project had a valuation of approximately $278 million. It consisted of a 4-story Type 1 sprinklered building with a total area of 2.5 million square feet. There were Alternate Methods & Materials Requests (AM & MR) with a request to eliminate the 2-hour fire protection required for Type 1 Construction by providing fire modeling reports and proposing mitigating measures to achieve "equivalency with Code requirements. This involved coordination between Fire and Building.
SFA provided 100% of the building safety review services. The initial turnaround time and rechecks were 10 and 5 days for each recheck respectively, which were less than the allowed time by the City's Building Official. SFA was involved at preliminary stages. Also, this project involved a substantial amount of time with the AM&M and went through eight (8) plan reviews since the developer/design team worked on portions of the project to make progress instead of comprehensive and complete responses each time. The total time to complete all 8 reviews, including the design team's work between each submittal was 4 months from submittal to approval.
The Building Official for the project was Keith Hightower. He has recently taken the position of Building Official for Desert Hot Springs. The current Building Official in Beaumont is Pedro Rico. He is also familiar with the project.
Contact: Pedro Rico, Building Official
Office: (951) 769-8529 #7
Cell: (951) 587-0542
Contact: Kristine Day, Assistant City Manager
Office: (951) 769-8520
Previous
Contact: Keith Hightower, Mr. Hightower is currently the Building Official in Desert Hot Springs His Phone No:
Office: (760) 329-6411 ext 257
Cell: (951) 377-1795
- 13-
Scott Fazelas a Associates, Ine.
Education First School - Costa Mesa, CA
The Education First project had a valuation of approximately $12.2 million. It consisted of a campus of six separate structures. Some were altered and others rebuilt or new. The original campus was Trinity Broadcasting Network's property. Education First is a private school for high school students who are exclusively from foreign countries and they live on campus. SFA worked on the Education First project in Pasadena as well. This project had AM&MR's for several items including issues with gurney elevators, fire access, bedroom escape windows, non- conforming stairs and construction types. Preliminary reviews, phone calls and meetings between submittals occurred. These items involved both Building and Fire Department coordination. For this project SFA also provided the Fire review for the Fire Department.
SFA provided 100% of the Building and Fire reviews. The turnaround times were 15, 10 and 5 for the initial review, first recheck, and additional rechecks, respectively which were less than the schedule agreed upon at the beginning.
The Building Official for this project was Issam Shahrouri. He is now the Community Development Director/Building Official for the City of San Francisco, CA.
Building:
Contact: Charles Chamonn, Plan Check Manager
Office: (714) 754-5614
Cell: (714) 425-7138
Previous
Contact: Issam Shahrouri, Building Official
Cell: (949) 245-5686
Fire:
Contact: Jon Neal, Fire Marshal
Office: (714) 754-5049
Cell: (714) 651-8270
Palmer Ontario Properties - Ontario, CA
Palmer Ontario is a mixed use development with a valuation of approximately $82 million. It consists of 3 levels and 925 residential units over a concrete podium parking garage with assembly, business, storage, parking and residential occupancies. It has Type 1A, VA and VB Construction. It is characterized by extremely long travel distances and multiple firewalls and horizontal exits. It also includes a 2 story clubhouse. This project also involved preliminary discussions with the Building Official.
-14-
Sent Fazeras d Associates, due.
SFA provided 100% of the building safety review services. The turnaround time and rechecks were 9, 9 and 5 days, for the initial 1 recheck and remaining rechecks respectively which were within the allowed time frames by the City Agreement.
Contact: Kevin Shear, Building Official, City of Ontario (Recently retired) Cell: (909) 322-6324
SFA REFERENCES
SFA currently provides building plan review services for the following agencies and SFA encourages the City to contact these agencies regarding our work performance.
Agency: CITY OF ARCADIA
Reference: Ken Fields, Building Official
(626) 574-5420
Service: Plan Review since 5/1/1999
Agency: CITY OF BEAUMONT
Reference: Christina Taylor, Community Development Director (951) 572-3212
Pedro Rico, CBO, Building Official
(951) 769-8529 ext. #7
Service: Plan Review since 7/1/2007
Agency: CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY
Reference: Robert Rodriguez, Acting Building Official
(760) 202-1460/760 770-0344
Service: Plan Review since 4/1/2002
Agency: CITY OF COSTA MESA
Reference: Charles Chamoun, Chief Plans Examiner
(714) 754-5614
Services: Plan Review since 1996
Agency: CITY OF IRVINE
Reference: Jessie Cardova, Building Official
(949) 724-6371
Services: Plan Review since 1996
- 15-
Scott Fazeis of Associatess, Bad.
Agency: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
Reference: Bill Belvin, CBO, Building Official
(951) 674-3124, #226
Service: Plan Review since 8/1/1996
Agency: CITY OF LA HABRA HEIGHTS
Reference: Fabiola Huerta, City Manager
(562) 694-6302, #227
Reference: Rafferty Woddridge, Assistant City Manager/
Community Development Director, #235
Service: Plan Review & Building Official since 1/31/2010 Agency: CITY OF NORWALK
Reference: John Ramirez, Community Devopment Director
(562) 929-5744
Service: Plan Review since 7/1/1997
Agency: CITY OF ONTARIO
Reference: James Caro, CBO, Building Official
(909) 395-2172 office
Service: Plan Review since 10/1/1998
Agency: CITY OF PASADENA
Reference: Sarkis Nazerian, CBO, Building Official
(626) 744-7571
Service: Plan Review
Plan Review since 1997
Agency: CITY OF SAN FERNANDO
Reference: Francisco Villalva, Building Official
(818) 898-1231
Service: Plan Review since 1999
Agency: CITY OF SANTA ANA
Reference: Jason Kwak, P.E., CBO, Building Official
(714) 647-5862
Service: Plan Review since 2005
Agency: CITY OF TUSTIN
Reference: Justina Willkom, Community Development Director (714) 573-3115
Dana Ogden, Dep. Director, Community Development
(714) 573-3109
Service: Plan Review since 2/1998 & Building Official since 2012 -16-
Seett Fazckas & Associates, inc.
Agency: CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS
Reference: Keith Hightower, CBO, Building Official/Community Development Director (760) 329-6411 ext 257/cell (951) 377-1795
Service: Plan Review since 2018
Agency: CITY OF WHITTIER
Reference: Michelle Harencame, CBO, Building Official
(562) 567-9320
Service: Plan Review since 2018
Agency CITY OF WESTMINSTER
leference Justin Ngnyen, P.E./CBO, Building Official
(714) 548-3475
Service: Plan Review since 2017
Agency: CITY OF VISTA
Reference: Fred Huddleston, Building Official
(760) 643-5392
Service: Plan Review since 2017
Other References are available upon request.
SECTION 13 ALTERNATE PROPOSALS
This Proposal is scoped to provide plan review services in accordance with the City's needs.
There are no alternate proposals being submitted. Our goal is to tailor services in accordance with the City's needs at all times.
SECTION 14 CONFLICT OF INTEREST
SFA was established to provide services exclusively to municipal building departments.
This not only ensures that no real or perceived conflicts of interest could occur but also provides a specialized operation that is tailored to the exact needs of municipal building departments. The regulations, statutes, new and changing codes and increased pressure to meet shorter timelines, make specializing in plan review an asset to the City of Santa Clarita. The primary service provided to our clients is plan review. SFA's plan check capabilities are enhanced by our understanding of the roles in a municipal building department which interface with, and rely upon, a competent plan review.
-17-
Scott Fazelras & Associates, Me.
SECTION 15 ADDITIONAL DATA
ADDITIONAL FEATURES
Since SFA only provides plan review services and we feel that our company can manage and truly be an extension of your building department. Our experienced staff of many years with the ability to tailor the requirements of each city to their specific needs makes our company unique. Our sophisticated plan log program allows us to print each night a scheduling report that shows the workload of the entire staff. This report is reviewed by our assignment manager to ensure that each engineer's workload for the days of the report are appropriate and achievable. We constantly monitor workload so as to always make our due dates.
Many checks and balances are in place to keep any plans from going late. We pride ourselves in being the best at what we do.
-18-
Scott Fazeias & Associates, inc.
RESUMES
-19-
SCOTT R. FAZEKAS
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Architecture, California State Polytechnic University, 1980 Supplementary Structural Course Work, California State University, Fullerton, 1984
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Licensed Architect, California, C-19012, Colorado, Nevada, NCARB
CERTIFICATION
LEED Accredited Professional, LEED
Certified Access Specialist, DSA CASp-063
Certified Building Official, I.C.C. 808505-CB
Certified Plans Examiner, I.C.C., C.B.C. 808505-K-6
Certified Building Inspector, I.C.C., C.B.C. 808505 K-1
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Fazekas is President of Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc. (SFA) which provides building official, building plan check and building inspection services to governmental agencies. He has interfaced with architects, engineers, designers, contractors, plan checkers, inspectors, developers and building owners to achieve code compliant building construction through the application of local, state, and federal codes and regulations.
Mr. Fazekas has plan checked buildings which encompass the full spectrum of building types and occupancy groups and has served as building official for fourteen jurisdictions through long term and interim contract arrangements. He has also contributed to both the design and code enforcement professions by regularly lecturing at code-related seminars and classes for Calbo and ICC. He served six years on the American Institute of Architects Building Performance and Regulations Committee where he as AIA's representative voted on the ANSI A117.1 Disabled Access Standards. He also served four years on I.C.B.O.'s General Design/Structural Review Committee and on the Orange Empire Chapter of I.C.B.O.'s Code Change Committee. He has served on the local Orange Empire Chapter of ICC's Board and was President in 2005. He has served as both contract and interim Building Official for 20 jurisdictions during his last 28 years in the private sector.
Mr. Fazekas has 48 years of progressive experience working in and for building departments. Prior to starting SFA, he was employed by BSI Consultants, Inc. as a Senior Vice President and Division Manager of the Building Safety Division. He was responsible for starting, developing and managing the Building Safety Division for 11 years. During that time he served as building official in California and Washington jurisdictions and oversaw plan review services for more than one hundred client agencies. He also founded and served as President of Employment Systems Inc., which was a corporation dedicated to municipal staffing needs. Before his term with BSI, he spent 13 years working for the building divisions in the Cities of Newport Beach and Costa Mesa where he worked his way through all levels in the departments from clerk to permit technician, inspector and plan check engineer.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
A.I.A., I.C.C., CALBO -20-
Scott Fazekas & Associates, anc.
GANESH M. RAO
EDUCATION
Masters of Science in Civil Engineering
Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Bangalore University, India
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Registered Structural Engineer in California S4471
Registered Professional Engineer in California C52721
Certified Plans Examiner, I.C.C. 1136557-60
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Rao has been a building plan check engineer in SFA's Irvine office since 1998. He reviews both commercial and residential plans for compliance with model codes and local ordinances. He has a total of 29 years of progressively involved engineering experience.
Prior to his employment with SFA, Mr. Rao has spent eight years in the design field with experience in California, Nevada and Hawaii designing wood, steel concrete and post-tensioned low, mid and high-rise structures. Occupancies which he has performed design work for have included retail, medical, office resort, bridge, industrial, schools, parking structure and hanger facilities.
Mr. Rao has experience in a variety of geographic regions. His design experience includes projects in California, Nevada, Washington, Oregon, Hawaii and the Territory of Guam. His plan review experience has been in California, Nevada and Colorado. Mr. Rao has reviewed plans for code compliance, residential, tenant improvement, low to mid-rise, tilt-up warehouses, etc. Projects included a three-dimensional finite element analysis of space frame for a mall in the Territory of Guam, Disney Building in Burbank utilizing "Haunch" moment connections, seismic retrofit of Mattel Distribution Center, an aircraft hanger and Sony Technology Center in San Diego. Projects also included design and detailing of antenna structure ranging from 30 feet monopole to 400 foot latticed tower.
-21- Scott Fazelas f Associates, inc.
KYLE B. TONOKAWA
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, 1985
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Civil Engineer, CA
CERTIFICATION
Certified Access Specialist, (CASp), DSA CASp-0642
M. Tonkav is a plan check engineer in SA's Irvine office. He provides plan reviews ofall types of construction and occupancy groups. Through his 33 years of municipal building department career he has gained diverse experience in zoning reviews, testing of proprietary construction products and listing, grading reviews and geotechnical report reviews and management of plan check staff in addition to comprehensive plan review responsibilities.
Mr. Tonokawa began his career in 1985 as a plan check engineer with the City of Los Angeles where he worked for 13 years providing building, zoning and grading plan reviews. He then spent nine (9) years as Senior Plan Check Engineer with the City of Anaheim where he handled major projects, as well as code interpretation resolutions and project flow and scheduling. His most recent position before joining SFA was 11 years in the City of Irvine as Senior Plan Check Engineer where, in addition to complex plan reviews, he handled staff training, inter-departmental representation and interfacing with consultants in providing plan review services.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Calbo - Post Disaster Safety Assessment Evaluator
California Office of Emergency Services - Essential Engineering Duties I.C.C.
-22-
Sent Fanckas a Associates, Boc.
VICTOR A. PENERA
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering
California State University, San Diego 1968
Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering
University of Southern California, 1970
Supplementary Structural Course Work
California State University, Los Angeles, 1973-76
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Registered Structural Engineer, California 1976, 2083
Registered Professional Engineer, California 1971, 21629
EXPERIENCE
After completing 30 years of service with the City of Los Angeles, Mr. Penera retired in April, 2000 and immediately joined SFA as a member of its plan check engineering staff.
Having worked four years in the Department of Public Works and 26 years in Building and Safety with the City of Los Angeles, Mr. Penera has substantial experience in both design and plan checking of structural systems. In the 26 years he spent with LA Department of Building and Safety, he plan checked a wide spectrum of structural systems, occupancies and uses; from simple, wood- frame, single family room additions to complex, high-rise, steel office buildings.
During the last three years of his career with Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety, Mr.
Penera served as the Deputy Superintendent of Building in charge of the Engineering Bureau. As Chief of the Engineering Bureau, Mr. Penera oversaw a staff of 175 engineers, technicians and clerical staff responsible for the checking for compliance of state and local regulations related to building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical and zoning issues.
Mr. Penera was active in the development of the first International Building Code (IBC). For one year he served on the Steering Committee for the development of the first draft of the IBC and for two years served as Chairman of the Structural Subcommittee to draft the structural engineering chapters (Chapters 16-26) of the proposed IBC.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Structural Engineers Association of Southern California American Society of Civil Engineers
International Conference of Building Officials
-23- Scott Fazeras & Associates, inc.
SCOTT D. BEERY
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Architectural (Structural) Engineering, California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo, CA
Associate of Science-Fire Technology, Santa Ana College, Santa Ana, CA
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Licensed Professional Civil Engineer, California
CERTIFICATION
Certified Plans Examiner, I.C.C., C.B.C.
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Beery has worked in the private design sector for eight years and he has 15 years municipal plan review experience. His structural design experience has covered residential, schools and a variety of commercial structures including timber, steel, concrete and masonry construction materials.
Prior to Mr. Beery working at SFA, he was an Associate Engineer for over two years with the County of San Diego Building Department. He then worked at the City of Anaheim for seven years as a Senior Plans Examiner and Plan Check Supervisor. His latter experience involved management duties and public interface with applicants as well as hands-on plan review.
At SFA, Mr. Beery provides comprehensive plan review services for all types of construction types and occupancy groups.
-24-
Seen Fancis associates, Banc.
PETER K. TANG
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, 1994
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Licensed Civil Engineer, California, C-59691
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Tang has been a plan check engineer in SFA's Irvine office for 18 years. He reviews both residential and commercial plans for compliance with model codes and ordinances. With a background in forensic investigations on wood-framed structures, he is particularly well versed in wood structures.
Over an 18 year period, Mr. Tang has been exposed to a variety of engineering design assignments with three different structural design firms. He was employed by Seismic, Inc. in Pomona, Ficcadenti & Waggoner Structural Engineers in Irvine, and John A. Martin Structural Engineers in Los Angeles prior to his employment with SFA.
Mr. Tang has been an excellent supervisor to junior plan checkers in the area of wood framing. His expertise in rack design has also made him a valuable resource in the review of increasingly large rack systems.
Mr. Tang was a project designer on Fresno State's Savemart Center, a steel and concrete sports area; the Pacific Grand Resort, a steel conference center in Huntington Beach; the Westpart Tiempo Community in Irvine, a seismic retrofit of homes; and the Casa Gateway Condos in Pacific Palisades, a seismic evaluation of 3-story homes.
Scott lanzalras c associates, Bone.
-25-
BRETT ARCHIBALD
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, California State San Diego, 2002 Structural Emphasis in Course Work
CERTIFICATIONS
Registered Civil Engineer, California C69206
Certified Plans Examiner, I.C.C. 5114159-60
Certified Mechanical Inspector, I.C.C. 5114159-41
Build It Green Certification, CA
Certified Access Specialist, DSA CASP-122
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Archibald is one of SFA's professional staff in our Irvine office. He has 18 years of experience with SFA reviewing both residential and commercial projects. He is responsible for tracking changes in T-24 Energy Regulations and updating all staff.
Mr. Archibald has experience in plan checking a variety of projects including single and multi- family housing, tenant improvements, new commercial and industrial buildings, seismic retrofits, tilt-up warehouses, etc. These projects involved structural systems such as wood framing, light gauge steel, moment frames, cantilever columns, concrete and masonry.
Mr. Archibald has also been instrumental in helping to establish tailored documentation for some of SFA's newer clients or clients which are modifying procedures or policies. His computer skills have assisted in the coordination of SFA processing with the needs of our clients.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council
American Society of Civil Engineers
-26-
Scott Fancias & Associates, Ine.
RANDY BUCK
EDUCATION
California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo, CA 1978-1979, Electrical Engineering Whitworth College, Spokane WA, 1977-1978
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Buck works for SFA to provide electrical plan review services on large or complex projects and interfaces with all plan check staff as-needed on unique electrical code issues. He has worked for SFA since his retirement from Costa Mesa in 2017.
Mr. Buck has worked in the electrical industry for the past 40 years, starting as an electrician, lectrical contractor and then entering the Du
I sta sa. Factored the entering her i is sere an earlier a lane i e for Costa Mesa. He presently teaches electrical code and ordinances for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW).
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Past President, International Association of Electrical Inspectors (IAEI) IAEI Professional Member #6034372
-27- Scott Fazekas & Associates, inc.
CITY FORMS
NOTICE TO BIDDERS REGARDING CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSAL # BS-20-21-20
Contractual Services For The City Of Santa Clarita's Building & Safety Division
1. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
a. A contract is required for any service performed on behalf of the City of Santa Clarita (City). Contract language will be negotiated upon acceptance of proposal and prior to commencement of work. Work cannot begin until the contract has been fully executed by both parties.
2. SUMMARY OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
a. These are the Insurance Requirements for Contractors providing services or supplies to the City. By agreeing to perform the work or submitting a proposal, you verify that you comply with and agree to be bound by these requirements. When Contract documents are executed, the actual Contract language and Insurance Requirements may include additional provisions as deemed appropriate by City's Risk Manager. b. You should check with your Insurance advisors to verify compliance and determine if additional coverage or limits may be needed to adequately insure your obligations under this agreement. These are the minimum required and do not in any way represent or imply that such coverage is sufficient to adequately cover the Contractor's liability under this agreement. The full coverage and limits afforded under Contractor's policies of Insurance shall be available to Buyer and these Insurance Requirements shall not in any way act to reduce coverage that is broader or includes higher limits than those required. The Insurance obligations under this agreement shall be: 1-all the Insurance coverage and limits carried by or available to the Contractor; or 2-the minimum Insurance requirements shown in this agreement, whichever is greater. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits and coverage required, which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to City. c. Contractor shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to City before work begins. City reserves the right to require full-certified copies of all Insurance coverage and endorsements.
3. INSURANCE
a. General Insurance Requirements
i. All insurance shall be primary insurance and shall name City of Santa Clarita as an additional insured. The naming of an additional insured shall not affect any recovery to which such additional insured would be entitled under the policy if not named as an additional insured, and an additional insured shall not be held liable for any premium or expense of any nature on the policy or any extension thereof solely because they are an additional insured thereon. ii. If the operation under this Agreement results in an increased or decreased risk in the opinion of the City's Risk Manager, then Consultant agrees that the minimum limits hereinabove designated shall be changed accordingly upon written request by the Risk Manager.
ili. Consultant agrees that provisions of this Section as to maintenance of insurance shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for the payment of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's activities, the activities of its subconsultants, or the activities of any person or persons for which Consultant is otherwise responsible.
iv. A Certificate of Insurance, and an additional insured endorsement (for general and automobile liability), evidencing the above insurance coverage with a company acceptable to the City's Risk Manager shall be submitted to City prior to execution of this Agreement on behalf of the City.
v. The terms of the insurance policy or policies issued to provide the above insurance coverage shall provide that said insurance may not be amended or canceled by the carrier, for nonpayment of premiums otherwise, without 30 days prior written notice of amendment or cancellation to City. In the event the said insurance is canceled, Consultant shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in the amounts heretofore established. vi. All required insurance must be in effect prior to awarding this Agreement, and it or a successor policy must be in effect for the duration of this Agreement.
Maintenance of proper insurance coverage is a material requirement of this Agreement, and the failure to maintain and renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of contract.
If Consultant, at any time during the term of this Agreement, should fail to secure or maintain any insurance required under this Agreement, City shall be permitted to obtain such insurance in Consultant's name at Consultant's sole cost and expense, or may terminate this Agreement for material breach. vil. Without limiting any other Consultant obligation regarding insurance, should Consultant's insurance required by this Agreement be cancelled at any point prior to expiration of the policy, Consultant must notify City within 24 hours of receipt of notice of cancellation. Furthermore, Consultant must obtain replacement coverage that meets all contractual requirements within 10 days of the prior insurer's issuance of notice of cancellation. Consultant must ensure that there is no lapse in coverage.
b. General Liability and Property Damage Insurance
i. Consultant agrees to procure and maintain general liability and property damage insurance at its sole expense to protect against loss from liability imposed by law for damages on account of bodily injury, including death therefrom, and property damage, suffered or alleged to be suffered by any person or persons whomsoever, resulting directly from any act or activities of Consultant, its subconsultants, or any person acting for Consultant or under its control or direction, and also to protect against loss from liability imposed by law for damages to any property of any person caused directly or indirectly by or from acts or activities of Consultant, or its subconsultants, or any person acting for Consultant, or under its control or direction. Such public liability and property damage insurance shall also provide for and protect City against incurring any legal cost in defending claims for alleged loss. Such general liability and property damage insurance shall be maintained in the following minimum limits: A combined single-limit policy with coverage limits in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence will be considered equivalent to the required minimum limits.
c. Automotive Insurance
i. Consultant shall procure and maintain public liability and property damage insurance coverage for automotive equipment with coverage limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit. If Consultant does not use automobiles in performing its work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide a waiver releasing City from all liability resulting from Consultant's use of personal vehicles under this Agreement.
d. Worker's Compensation Insurance
i. Consultant shall procure and maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence or as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure, and provide legal defense for both Consultant and City against any loss, claim, or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases happening to any worker employed by Consultant in the course of carrying out this Agreement. ii. Waiver of Subrogation: The insurer(s) agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents, volunteers and employees for losses paid under the terms of the workers compensation policy which arise from work performed by Consultant for City.
Questions and requests for modification of these terms must be negotiated and approved prior to contract execution and are at the full discretion of the City.
I have read and understand the above requirements and agree to be bound by them for any work performed for the City.
Authorized Signature: Sutt Fil _ Date: _ 2-11-21
Printed Name: Scott R. Fazekas
DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS/SUBCONSULTANTS
PROPOSAL # BS-20-21-20
Contractual Services For The City Of Santa Clarita's Building & Safety Division Subcontractor DIR Registration No. Dollar Value of Work No subs
Age of firm: Annual Gross Receipts:
ĐBE: -Yes- -No
Certifying Agency:
Location and Place of Business
Bid Schedule Item No's: Description of Work
License No. Exp. Date: / 7 Phone (
Subcontractor DIR Registration No. Dollar Value of Work Age of firm: Annual Gross Receipts:
ABE:- YesNo
Certifying Agency:
Location and Place of Business
Bid Schedule Item No's: Description of Work
License No. Exp. Date: _/ / Phone ( )
Subcontractor DIR Registration No. Dollar Value of Work Age of firm: ĐBE: Yes No Annual Gross Receipts:
Gertifying Agency:
Location and Place of Business
Bid Schedule Item No's: Description of Work
License No. Exp. Date: Phone ( T
NOTE: A contractor or subcontractor shall not be qualified to propose on, be listed in a proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of 2222
contract is awarded.
REFERENCES
PROPOSAL # BS-20-21-20
Contractual Services For The City Of Santa Clarita's Building & Safety Division City of Santa Clarita, California
The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three public agencies for which proposer has performed work of a similar scope and size within the past 3 years. If the instructions on this form conflict with the references requested in the scope of work, the scope of work shall govern. Complete this form out accordingly. Fill out this form completely and upload it with your proposal. 1 city Pardon, Eriki sly 415 Nicartiall Ave.
Sarkis Nazerian, Builling Official, (626) 744-7087
Vame and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Projec #300,000 ук. Builde PlanCheck, Ongonn
Contract Amount ate Complete
Vame and Address of Owner / Agenc!
Justine Willkom, Comm. Devel. Dir. (114) 573-3115
Vame and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Projec 00000yr. Building an heck BO. ongoing
City of sadia, Building Division, 240M Huntingen Dr.
Vame and Address of Owner / Agency
Katie Billing Oflicial, (626)574-5420
$50.000/ уг. Bribling on check, Ongoing
Contract Amount
The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all brokers and sureties from whom Proposer intends to procure insurance bonds:
Insur Bonds NA-scape is regulatory consulting only
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT & ACCEPTANCE OF SCOPE OF WORK
PROPOSAL # BS-20-21-20
Contractual Services For The City Of Santa Clarita's Building & Safety Division By providing the three (3) required signatures below, the Contractor acknowledges full understanding, complete agreement to, and accepts in its entirety, all Scope of Work for the Contractual Services For The City Of Santa Clarita's Building & Safety Division. The Contractor will be expected to perform maintenance practices and uphold the standards herein to the established Scope of Work throughout the length of the _Date: 2-11-21
ernes one feath Figh Date: 2-11-21
_Date: 2-11-21
*All three signatures required
Addendum No.1
February 9, 2021
Addendum No. 1
PROPOSAL # BS-20-21-20
Contractual Services For The City Of Santa Clarita's Building & Safety Division This addendum must be acknowledged via BiNet and should be included with the proposal response.
The purpose of this addendum is to address the following for this Request for Proposals (RFP):
I. RENEWAL LANGUAGE UPDATE
The contract renewal language in Section A, RFP Information & Instructions, will be updated to the following in sub-section # 12 of Renewal and Pricing Adjustments:
RENEWAL AND PRICING ADJUSTMENT. Contracts entered into pursuant to this RFP may be renewed annually, up to four times, in accordance with the terms of the contract. If not otherwise stated, the contract may be renewed if the new pricing of the contract does not change more than the Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers (not seasonally adjusted), Los Angeles Area-Riverside-Orange county area and prevailing wage rates, if applicable. The index level for the month preceding the month of solicitation advertisement will become the beginning index. The price adjustment limit will be the percentage change based on the difference between the beginning level or the adjustment level last used and the index level for the period 90 days prior to the award anniversary. The final adjusted amount will be determined by purchasing staff. If a price adjustment is not requested prior to the award anniversary date, the previous year's rates will apply.
The contract for these professional services may be renewed up to four times annually.
END OF ADDENDUM
This addendum must be acknowledged via BidNet and should be included with the response.
Lette Fach 2-22-21
Contractor's Representative Date
Scott Fazelast Associates, Inc
Company Name
PROPOSAL # BS-20-21-20