Santa Clarita City Council
November 26, 2024

Former Senior Center Building Assessment
CIP-24-25-F0006
City of Santa Clarita
Request for Proposals
October 17, 2024
Photo: BioscienceLA, Culver City, CA Los Angeles County Internal Services Department 2120 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 210 Santa Monica, CA 90403 T 310.446.4664 F 310.446.4663 www.fremerarchitects.com October 17, 2024
City of Santa Clarita
23920 Valencia Blvd. Suite 300
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Reference: Fremer Architects Proposal for CIP=24-25-F0006 Former Senior Center Building Assessment Dear Members of the Evaluation Committee:

We HH Fremer Architects dba Fremer Architects, are honored to submit our proposal for property assessment services in response to the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Former Senior Center Building Assessment. We bring extensive experience in performing comprehensive assessments of existing buildings and their systems. With over 40 years of dedicated service in the field of architecture, we have developed a distinguished portfolio specializing in library renovations, adaptive reuse projects, and public facilities for both private and governmental clients and have successfully completed numerous projects of similar scope, assisting municipalities and organizations in understanding the condition and long-term needs of their properties.

Our expertise lies in the detailed evaluation of a property’s condition, which includes architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. We collaborate with a dedicated team of consultants who specialize in these areas and are familiar with the complexities of this type of work. Together, we offer a holistic approach to property assessments, ensuring that all critical systems are carefully evaluated to provide a comprehensive and accurate analysis.

Our team is experienced in producing reports that not only assess the current condition of a property but also project potential capital repair and replacement costs over the forecasted period. These reports assist cities like yours in making informed decisions regarding future capital planning and budgeting.

As part of our assessment process, we will provide:
• A detailed analysis of the building and site systems, evaluating them against industry standards. • An investigation into the presence of hazardous materials such as asbestos, lead-based paint, and mold, as well as any water intrusion issues.
• Identification of conspicuous deficiencies across all systems. • A life-cycle analysis, projecting remaining useful life and costs for repair or replacement of site and building systems.

We understand the importance of providing an accurate and reliable property assessment to help the City make well-informed decisions. Our goal is to support your team in understanding the current and future needs of the property, ensuring the ongoing safety, functionality, and efficiency of your facilities.

In light of the RFP requirements, we are confident in our ability to not only meet but exceed your expectations. We eagerly anticipate the opportunity to further discuss how Fremer Architects can help the City of Santa Clarita meet its needs for a comprehensive assessment report for the Former Senior Center Building. e look forward to the opportunity to contribute to the success of this project and are confident that our team is well-qualified to meet the expectations outlined in the RFP . Thank you for your consideration.

Again, we are excited about the opportunity to work with the City and we look forward to the potential collaboration and the chance to contribute our expertise and unique strategies/approach to your future projects. Should you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,
HH Fremer Architects, Inc.

Hal Fremer , AIA
Principal/Owner
T: (310) 464-4664 | E: [email protected]

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Santa Clarita
Former Senior Center Building Assessment RFP
CIP-24-25-F0006
page
Table of Contents
Cover Letter
Table of Contents
Section A Firm Introduction & References
Section B Plan of Study/Scope of Work
Section C Schedule & Program Management
Section D Personnel, Equipment & Facilities
Section E Subconsultants
Section F Forms
2 3
4 7
10 14
20 49
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section A. Firm Introduction & References

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section A. Firm Introduction & References
Firm Background & References
Since our founding, HH Fremer Architects (HHFA) dba
Fremer Architects has provided conscientious solutions to all of our clients’ architectural and planning needs. Operating independently since 1983, HHFA consistently delivers exceptional results which arise from careful consideration of our clients’ as - pirations. We believe that design is, at its most basic, an attempt to conform the dynamics of the physical world to our desire to inhabit it. As the world continues to evolve, so does our design – ever-changing, constantly re-thinking the aesthetics of architecture according to the unique project demands of each client’s vision.

At the same time, HHFA operates on the belief that the nature of architecture is in its details. The success of this approach is evident in our innovative design projects and strong reputation for quality renovation. In structures where functional elements are paramount, special attention must be paid to creating spaces where function can coexist with inspiration. Details elevate a project’s architectural impact – while never sacrificing accessibility and safety – and address the way in which it enriches the experience of its surrounding structures and its location as a whole.

HHFA never loses sight of our clients’ budgetary and scheduling concerns. Instead, our team is committed to partnering with the City of Santa Clarita to develop a tailored approach to each project assignment. Drawing on four decades of experience and employing the latest project management techniques, we will work closely with the City of Santa Clarita in support of the building assessment for the City’s Former Senior Center.

With a proven track record, we confidently assert that our team is the best-suited candidate to fulfill the requirements requested under this solicitation.

Overall Experience
With decades of combined experience, our team of architects and engineers brings a wealth of knowledge to every project.

We have successfully completed a diverse range of projects, from ground up libraries, library renovations and tenant im - provements to large-scale commercial complexes. Our portfolio speaks to our adaptability and expertise in handling projects of various sizes and complexities.

Within the last five years, HHFA has provided comprehensive building assessment services for a number of directly relevant projects, including prior experience with the County of Los Angeles Internal Services Department & County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. Services have ranged from
program and scoping reports, planning and feasibility studies, and conceptual through final design & final construction for projects of various size, levels of complexity, and delivery methods, with project valuations ranging from a few thousand dollars to $40,000,000 and greater.

The table on the following page showcases our project experience in relation to the City of Santa Claritas’s RFP scope of work:
• Architectural & engineering building assessments
• Architectural & engineering planning and programming studies
• Building code compliance studies
• Site planning studies
• Landscape design
• Construction cost estimating
• Sustainable design and CALGreen compliance
• As-built documentation
• Code research
• Project scheduling
• Waterproofing
Additionally, our subconsultants have experience in the following list in relation to the City of Santa Clarita’s RFP scope of work:
• Structural engineering
• Cost estimating
• Kitchen/foodservice design
• Landscape design
• Civil engineering & surveying
• MEP engineering
• Environmental engineering
We have also assisted clients extensively in developing project scope and assembling program studies for various building types. These studies have become the basis for the enduring value of the projects for which we provide full design and documentation services and solutions. HHFA possesses a
heightened understanding of the budget, schedule, and technical constraints common to public sector projects, and has proven successful in programming these typologies.

Years in Existence and Project Commitment
Having been established for 40 years, HHFA stands as a
testament to our enduring presence in the industry. Our longevity is a testament to our stability, reliability, and commitment to the field. We assure our prospective clients that we possess the resources, infrastructure, and financial stability to provide uninterrupted services throughout the pre-qualification period and the duration of the project.

Efficient Project Completion
Our current team of 4 full-time employees consists of experts in building components and anaylsis, ensuring that we have the capacity to handle multiple projects simultaneously without compromising quality. We prioritize effective project management and streamlined communication to ensure that assignments are completed in a timely and efficient manner.

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section A. Firm Introduction & References
Our established workflow methodologies, combined with our proficiency in project scheduling and resource allocation, enable us to consistently meet deadlines and exceed client expectations.

HHFA Relevant Expertise & Experience
Within the last five years, HHFA has provided planning and design services for a number of directly relevant projects, including prior experience with the County of Los Angeles Internal Services Department, County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works and the USC Medical Center, as well as at UCLA, San Diego State University, CSU Long Beach & the Boys & Girls Club of SFV .

Services have ranged from program and scoping reports,
planning and feasibility studies, and conceptual through final design for projects of various size, levels of complexity, and delivery methods. Additionally, we have also assisted clients extensively in developing project scope and assembling program studies for various building types. These studies have become the basis for the enduring value of the projects for which we provide full design and documentation services, in addition to those for which we provide design-build performance requirements. HHFA possesses a heightened understanding of the budget, schedule, and technical constraints common to public works projects, and has proven successful in programming these typologies.

The table above shows some of our recent and past
relevant projects.

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section B. Plan of Study/Scope of Work

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section B. Plan of Study/Scope of Work
Work Program
The following describes our proposed tehcnical approach addressing the specific issues identified in the RFP .

Review of City Provided Documents
Overview: Documents provided by the City will be reviewed by the Team as required by the RFP .

Subtasks: The team will begin by thoroughly reviewing
the existing as-built plans provided by the City, focusing on the accuracy of the provided drawings and identifying any discrepancies. Our technical approach includes cross-referencing the as-built plans with the current site conditions observed during the visual site survey. We will highlight key areas where modifications or additional documentation may be required to ensure proper alignment between the provided plans and the actual conditions.

The analysis report from the Landscape Architecture and Design Department will be reviewed to understand the existing site and landscaping conditions, including challenges and opportunities related to the current landscape design. Special attention will be paid to site drainage issues, which have been identified as a concern. We will assess whether the recommendations in the report align with the proposed renovation objectives and ensure that any site modifications, particularly regarding drainage, integrate smoothly into the overall project scope.

The provided as-built plans will be scrutinized in the absence of original building floor plans. Our team will compare the architectural designs provided with the current physical structure to ensure that any proposed work complies with the original design intent and modern construction practices. Where inconsistencies are noted, we will document areas of concern, suggesting alternatives or adjustments where necessary.

Output: Findings from this task will be incorporated into the overall anaylsis and assessment of the building in the Assessment report.

Review of Existing Conditions
Overview: A site and building walkthrough will be performed by the Team along side a City Representative to investigate the existing conditions.

Subtasks: A detailed visual site survey will be conducted to evaluate both external and accessible internal site components.

This will include a walkthrough of the building’s structural systems, building envelope, and critical internal elements such as mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems. Our Team will document conditions of all visible components, with attention to key systems that may require further evaluation or replacement.

Where destructive testing is needed, the Team will submit a formal request to the City, detailing the extent of proposed demolition and reasoning behind the need for invasive measures.

Specialty consultants (e.g., MEP , structural, and landscape, civil, environmental, waterproofing) will be involved as needed to provide expert insights into specific building systems. Their input will help guide decisions on the life expectancy, current condition, and replacement costs for key components.

The following specific areas will be surveyed by the Team in efforts to provide a comprehensive report:
• Site and Grounds: Comprehensive evaluation of pavement, parking, curbs, sidewalks, landscaping, irrigation, exterior lighting, walls, and drainage. Particular emphasis will be placed on resolving site drainage issues by conducting in- depth surveys to analyze existing drainage patterns, and identifying all underground drain pipe daylight outlets. • Structural Systems: Assessment of the building’s foundations and framing, including walls, columns, and roof systems.

This evaluation will help confirm the structural integrity and highlight areas requiring repair or reinforcement.
• Building Envelope: Visual inspection of roofing systems, flashings, exterior finishes, doors, and windows.

Recommendations for upgrades or replacements will be
provided to improve energy efficiency and weatherproofing. • Interior Building Components: Visual survey of finishes in all accessible areas, with recommendations for updates to meet current aesthetic and functional needs.
• Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Systems (MEP): A visual and operational assessment of MEP systems, including HVAC, plumbing, electrical wiring, and conveyance systems.

Specialty consultants may be required for more detailed inspections and recommendations for system upgrades or
replacements.
• Commercial Kitchen Components: Survey of the range,
exhaust hood, commercial sinks, freezers, dishwasher, and other kitchen components to ensure they meet current safety and operational standards.
• ADA Compliance Review: ADA compliance review will identify areas where “readily achievable” modifications can be made to meet accessibility standards.
• Fire and Life Safety: Review of fire suppression systems, alarms, exit signage, emergency lighting, and hydrants.

Recommendations will be made to enhance safety and meet code requirements.

In support of the findings from the visual inspection, interviews and research interviews will be conducted as necessary with maintenance personnel, City officials, and other stakeholders to gather historical data and maintenance records. Our research will focus on uncovering any undocumented issues or repairs that CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

may impact the current renovation project.

Output: Findings from this task will be incorporated into the overall anaylsis and assessment of the building in the Assessment report.

Environmental Survey
Overview: An environmental survey will be conducted
concurrently with the review of existing conditions by licensed professionals. Their appropriate certifications and licenses are included in the Sub-Consultant Section of this document.

Subtasks:
• Asbestos Survey: A pre-renovation asbestos survey will be conducted, adhering to the EPA’s Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) standards. Bulk material samples will be collected and analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy.

Where necessary, destructive access will be minimized but performed in areas requiring assessment.
• Lead-Based Paint Screening: Limited lead-based paint screening will be conducted through paint chip sampling to ensure safety during demolition activities. Follow-up testing will be recommended as needed.
• Mold and Water Intrusion Investigation: Moisture meter testing and visual inspections will be conducted to identify areas impacted by water intrusion. Where mold or other issues are identified, sampling will be performed, and a thorough analysis provided in the final report.

The approach ensures a thorough assessment of the property and building systems, aligning with project objectives and ensuring compliance with safety and regulatory standards.

Output: Findings from this task will be incorporated into the overall anaylsis and assessment of the building in the Assessment report.

Deliverables
Overview: A comprehensive report will be compiled to include all the findings from the aforementioned tasks.

Subtasks: The assessment report will be designed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the existing conditions of the facility, identify critical issues, and propose actionable solutions to enhance building performance and longevity. The report will encompasse a wide range of technical and functional aspects, all geared towards aligning the building with safety, operational efficiency, and modern standards.

Section B. Plan of Study/Scope of Work
Key Deliverables include:
• Executive Summary: A concise overview of the findings and key recommendations for building improvements.
• Site and Building Overview: Review of site conditions, including landscaping, parking, and accessibility.
• Structural Assessment: Evaluation of the building’s structural systems, including foundation, load-bearing elements,
and potential areas of deterioration, and identification of necessary repairs or reinforcements for structural integrity. • MEP Systems (Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing): Detailed analysis of the building’s HVAC, electrical, and plumbing systems with recommendations for upgrades or replacements to meet modern energy and efficiency standards.
• Code Compliance Review: Assessment of compliance with current building codes and ADA standards and identification of any deficiencies and corrective actions required.
• Interior and Exterior Condition: Evaluation of interior finishes, fixtures, and overall functionality of spaces and review of exterior materials, including façade, windows, doors, and roofing, with recommendations for repairs or replacements. • Energy Efficiency and Sustainability: Analysis of the building’s energy performance with recommendations for improving
sustainability through energy-efficient systems, materials, and potential for renewable energy integration.
• Fire-Life Safety: Review of safety systems, including egress, fire alarm and sprinkler systems and recommendations for code compliance.
• Conclusions and Recommendations: Summary of prioritized actions to address immediate concerns and long-term
improvements. Cost Estimate: A Rough Order of Magnitude for recommendations made.
• Photos and Visual Documentation: Comprehensive visual records of the building’s condition.
• Technical Data: Testing results and technical evaluations.

This structure ensures a clear and organized presentation of the deliverables, allowing stakeholders to quickly understand the current condition of the building and the proposed actions needed to address key issues.

Output: Upon delivery and review by the City of Santa Clarita, a presentation/Q&A session will be conducted by the T eam for any questions and clarification.

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section C. Schedule & Program Management

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section C. Schedule & Program Management
Schedule
The project schedule for the building assessment provides a clear timeline for evaluating the condition and performance of the existing structure. This schedule includes key phases such as initial site inspections, data collection, detailed analysis of building systems, and the preparation of the final assessment report. Each phase has been designed to ensure thorough evaluation while maintaining efficiency and minimizing disruption to building operations. Our team is committed to delivering a comprehensive assessment within the specified timeline, enabling informed decision-making for future renovations or improvements.

Phase 1: Initial Assessment (Week 1-4)
Objective: Gather all relevant data, including existing site conditions, documentation, and project scope details.

Activities include:
• Conduct site visits and field verifications
• Review architectural drawings, structural reports, and as-built conditions.
• Engage with key stakeholders to clarify objectives and project requirements.

Phase 2: Detailed Evaluation & Analysis (Week
5-8)
Objective: Perform in-depth analysis of the gathered data, identify potential challenges, and recommend solutions.

Activities include:
• Evaluate structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems for compliance and adequacy.
• Analyze any discrepancies between current conditions and proposed renovation needs.
• Collaborate with consultants (e.g., landscape, civil, environmental, etc.) to incorporate their assessments into the review.
• Delivery of final comprehensive Assessment Report with detailed findings, risks, and recommended solutions.

Phase 3: Final Review & Stakeholder Presentation
(Week 10)
Objective: Present findings to stakeholders, address any concerns, and finalize the assessment.

Activities include:
• Prepare a presentation summarizing the assessment and recommendations.
• Conduct a review meeting with the client and other key stakeholders for feedback.
• Incorporate any final changes or adjustments based on stakeholder input.

This timeline is designed to ensure a comprehensive and collaborative assessment process, with clear deliverables and sufficient time for review and feedback before finalizing the report.

Program Management
Our Team will be utilizing the Waterfall project management method, which is a linear, sequential approach to managing projects, where each phase must be completed before the next one begins. This method involves a step-by-step process to ensure thorough evaluation, documentation, and analysis.

1. Requirement Gathering and Analysis
The first phase focuses on defining the scope and objectives of the assessment project. All relevant data, client needs, and project constraints are gathered through interviews, research, or document review. A clear understanding of the project goals and expectations is established and documented. The deliverables from this phase include a project charter or assessment brief that outlines the project’s scope, timeline, and resources.

2. Design and Planning
Based on the requirements collected, the project team develops a detailed plan for executing the assessment. This includes defining the assessment criteria, methodologies, tools, and resources required. The design phase often produces assessment frameworks or questionnaires. The project schedule, milestones, and risk management strategies are outlined during this stage.

3. Execution (Data Collection and Assessment)
In this phase, the actual data collection and assessment take place according to the predefined methods. Site visits, surveys, interviews, or data analysis are conducted systematically. Each task is performed according to the plan, and any issues encountered are documented for later resolution. This phase culminates in gathering all necessary information and preparing it for analysis.

4. Verification and Analysis
Once the data is collected, it is analyzed to generate insights and identify trends, patterns, or issues. The analysis follows the framework set out in the design phase. The findings are verified for accuracy and completeness before moving to the next phase.

This step ensures that the information is reliable and aligned with project goals.

5. Reporting and Presentation
In this final phase, the results of the assessment are compiled into a comprehensive report. The report includes detailed findings, conclusions, and any recommendations based on the analysis.

This deliverable is typically presented to stakeholders in a formal CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

presentation. Any follow-up actions or further assessments required are also documented at this stage.

The diagram on the following page illustrates our
the proposed schedule for this assessment.

Section C. Schedule & Program Management
Section C. Schedule & Program Management
Former Senior Center Fremer Architects
Santa Clarita, CA 2120 Wilshire Blvd., Ste 210
Santa Monica, CA 90403
(310) 446-4664 Tel
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 57 58 59 60 57 58 59 60 1 Assessment
City of Santa Clarita Review (approx 2 weeks)
2 Presentation
April MayJanuary
2025
Feb March
Created On: 10/15/2024
Phase
April MayJanuary February March June July
2024
November DecemberAugust September October
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Note: Dates to change pending on issuance of NTP
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section D. Personnel, Equipment & Facilities

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

CITY OF SANTA

CLARITA
Project Management
Relevant Departmental
Stakeholders
Organizational Structure, Key Personnel &
Staff
The organization chart below illustrates the roles and reporting relationships of the key staff proposed to efficiently manage the City of Santa Clarita’s project and deliver high-quality architectural and engineering assessment services.

Details on HHFA’s team follow in this section. Additionally, we have included brief profiles on the engineering and specialty subconsultants HHFA is proposing for this RFP in the following section.

HH Fremer Architects
Principles
Harold Fremer , AIA, NCARB
Principal-in-Charge &
Principal Architect
(Santa Monica, CA)
Derrick Masulis, S.E.

Principal &
Structural Engineer
(Glendale, CA)
Grossman & Speer
Structural Engineering

HH Fremer Architects
Prime Consultant / Project Management / QA & QC / Waterproofing Architecture, Planning, Programming & Specialized Technical Services, Specifications (Certified LSBE / SBE)
Dan Puengprechawat
Associate Principal,
Senior Project Manager
(Santa Monica, CA)
KPJ Consulting
Cost Estimating
(LSBE / WBE / MBE)
Jacqueline Chan
Principal Estimator
(Los Angeles, CA)
Wilson Davis Associates
Landscape Architecture
Tim Davis, RLA
Landscape Architect
(Riverside, CA)
Joe C. Ablay, P .E., CEM, GBE
Owner-in-Charge &
Mechanical Engineer
(Walnut, CA)
ICI Engineers, Inc.

M&P Engineering
(DBE / SBE / MBE)
Jeff Chess, P. E .

Vice President &
Civil Engineer
(Santa Clarita, CA)
PSOMAS
Civil Engineering &
Surveying
Rolando Sotelo, P. E .

President &
Principal Engineer
(Santa Clarita, CA)
RES & Associates
Electrical Engineering
Section D. Personnel, Equipment & Facilities
Costel Coca
Principal
(Anaheim, CA)
Webb Foodservice
Design
Kitchen Consultant
(WBE / MBE)
Henry Moreno
President &
Program Manager
(La Mirada, CA)
Bainbridge Environmental
Consultants
Environmental Testing
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section D. Personnel, Equipment & Facilities
Education
Master of Architecture, University of Southern California Master of Business Administration, University of Southern California
Bachelor of Science, Architecture, University of Southern California
ProfEssional rEgistration
California Architects Board, License #C13638
ProfEssional affiliations
American Institute of Architects
AIA California Council
AIA Los Angeles
Board of Directors, Boys & Girls Club of San Fernando Valley National Council of Architectural Registration Boards
awards/Publications
2016 AIA San Fernando Valley Award of Excellence (Olive View UCLA Medical Day Care Center)
2006 AIA Design Excellence Award (Valley Plaza Branch Library) rElEvant ProjEct ExPEriEncE
LACDPW Olive View-UCLA Medical Center Child Care Facility, Sylmar, CA
LACDPW Olive View-UCLA Medical Center Master Plan,
Sylmar, CA
LADPW Valley Plaza Branch Library, North Hollywood, CA
LADPW/LABOE Denker Park Recreation Center, Los Angeles, CA LADPW/LABOE Y osemite Recreation Center , Los Angeles, CA LADPW/LABOE Y ucca Park Community and Y outh Centers,
Hollywood, CA
Boys & Girls Club of San Fernando Valley, Los Angeles, CA USC Health Science Campus Clinical Sciences Center Fire Protection & Accessibility Renovations, Los Angeles, CA LACCD/Los Angeles Southwest College, Accessibility Master Plan, Los Angeles, CA
LACCD/Los Angeles Mission College Student Services Center, Sylmar, CA
LACCD/Los Angeles City College, Replacement Facilities, Los Angeles, CA
UCSB West Campus Faculty Housing, Santa Barbara, CA
UCLA Lake Arrowhead Maintenance Building, Los Angeles, CA UCLA Faculty Levering Housing, Los Angeles, CA
UCLA Sunset Village/Courtside, Los Angeles, CA
UCLA Sproul Hall Modernization, Los Angeles, CA
UCLA Rieber Hall Modernization, Los Angeles, CA
UCLA Hedrick Hall Modernization, Los Angeles, CA
UCLA Patient Family Guest House, Los Angeles, CA
Aerospace Hall Museum Renovation, Los Angeles, CA
Valley Branch Library, North Hollywood, CA
OCSD Operations Center Renovation and Accessibility
Upgrades, Huntington Beach, CA
Orange County Sanitation District Purchasing & Contracts Administration Expansion, Fountain Valley, CA
Fourth Street Plaza, San Bernardino, CA
Mr. Fremer is the founding principal of HH
Fremer Architects, Inc., with more than 30 years
of professional practice experience. He has
committed his professional career to creating a
firm dedicated to architectural excellence while
serving the interests of clients and communities.

Over the course of his career, he has developed
particular expertise in the design of renovation
and modernization projects for municipal
and institutional clients, including the City of
Los Angeles Department of Public Works and
Bureau of Engineering, and the County of Los
Angeles Department of Public Works.

Mr. Fremer’s background in project finance
and the economics of development are central
to his success in planning, budgeting and on
time project delivery.

Examples of some of Mr. Fremer’s relevant
experience follow in this section.

For this RFP , he will be responsible for
overseeing the overall project & administrative
tasks.

Hal H. Fremer, AIA
Principal-in-Charge &
Project Architect

OUR TEAM

KEY STAFF

comPlEtion
2016
2014
2006
2004
2004
2000
2018
2012
2012
2012
2010
2009
2003
2004
2004
2008
2009
2010
2013
2001
2006
2014
2014
1996

OUR TEAM

KEY STAFF
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Mr. Puengprechawat has more than 20 years
of professional experience as a designer and
Project Manager for a wide range of project
types, including municipal/civic, healthcare,
institutional, hospitality and student/faculty
housing.

He is responsible for interfacing with clients
and leading design teams on multiple projects
simultaneously through entitlement, initial
design, technical development and construction.

Recently he has completed various projects with
both Los Angeles County ISD & DPW including
BioscienceLA (formerly Culver City Courthouse),
Centro Maravilla Service Center & East Los
Angeles Service Center.

For this RFP , he will be responsible for
overseeing the evaluation of the building’s
structural, mechanical, and architectural
components, coordinating with consultants and
stakeholders, managing schedules and budgets,
and ensuring that all findings are accurately
documented and aligned with project goals.

Dan Puengprechawat
Associate Principal
Education
Bachelor of Architecture, California State Polytechnic of Pomona ProjEct ExPEriEncE
Blacksmith.TV LA Office Assessment & T enant Improvement, Culver City, CA
LACISD Bioscience LA (formerly Culver City Courthouse), Culver City, CA
LACISD Camp Gonzales Building Upgrades and Campus
Modernization, Calabasas, CA
LACISD Olive View Psychiatric Urgent Care Center Renovation T enant Improvement, Sylmar , CA
LACISD Centro Maravilla Bathrooms ADA Upgrade, Roofing
and HVAC Replacement, Los Angeles, CA
LACISD VIctoria Park Roofing and HVAC Replacement,
Carson, CA
LACISD City T errace Park Roofing Replacement, East Los Angeles, CA
LACISD La Mirada Library Data Upgrade, La Mirada, CA
LACDPW T win T owers Correctional Facility Elevator , ADA & HVAC Assesment, Los Angeles, CA
LACDPW MLK South Support Building HVAC Replacement,
Compton, CA
LACDPW Rosemead Library Bathrooms ADA Upgrade,
Rosemead, CA
LACDPW El Monte Library Bathrooms ADA Upgrade,
El Monte, CA
LACDPW Hall of Administration Bathrooms ADA Upgrade,
Los Angeles, CA
LADPW/LABOE Denker Park Recreation Center, Los Angeles, CA LADPW/LABOE Y osemite Recreation Center , Los Angeles, CA LADPW Valley Plaza Branch Library, Los Angeles, CA
UCLA Faculty Levering Housing Retrofit & Renovation,
Westwood, CA
UCLA Courtside Housing Retrofit & Renovation, Westwood, CA UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference Facility Kitchen Renovation, Lake Arrowhead, CA
UCLA Patient Family Guesthouse Renovation, Los Angeles, CA Hilton Garden Inn Renovation, Hollywood, CA
The ‘Green Umbrella’ Renovation, Culver City, CA
AC Beverly Hills Adaptive Re-use, Beverly Hills, CA
AC Hotel, El Segundo, CA
Marriott Courtyard, Santa Ana, CA
Marriott Courtyard, Long Beach, CA
Marriott Residence Inn, Rowland Heights, CA
Marriott Residence Inn LAX Office Building to Hotel Conversion, Los Angeles, CA
Hampton Inn & Suites, Hollywood, CA
Home2Suites, Montebello, CA
Rowland Town Center, Rowland Heights, CA
Staybridge Suites, Long Beach, CA
The Source Retail & Hotel, Buena Park, CA
The ‘Beehive’, Culver City, CA

OUR TEAM

KEY STAFF
comPlEtion
In progress
2021
In progress
In progress
2022
2023
2023
2022
Permitted
2023
2023
2023
2004
2004
2006
2022
2003
2002
2003
2010
2001
2017
2019
2010
2013
Permitted
2013
2017
2018
In progress
2022
2016
1999
Section D. Personnel, Equipment & Facilities
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Ms. Ablay brings over 12 years of experience
in the architectural and engineering industry,
working on a variety of project types which
include hospitality, commercial, adaptive reuse,
as well as several projects within the healthcare
and military sectors.

Her breadth of experience has gained her
the knowledge and ability to proficiently lead
and oversee project development and its
team, spanning from conceptual design to
construction observation phases of work, and
through project completion.

Currently, Ms. Ablay is assisting in the
management of several County of Los Angeles
ISD and DPW projects, including the Camp
Gonzales Renovation and Campus Site
Improvements, UCLA Olive View Psychiatric
Urgent Care Center T enant Improvement, and
the MLK North Support Building and Facilities
Management Building projects.

For this RFP , she will be responsible for
assisting the associate principle with the
evaluation, coordination, correspondence &
documentation of the project.

Joni Ablay
Project Manager
Education
Doctorate of Architecture, University of Hawai’i at Manoa ProfEssional crEdEntials
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Associate
ProjEct ExPEriEncE
Blacksmith.TV LA Office Assessment & T enant Improvement, Culver City, CA
LACISD Camp Gonzales Building Upgrades and Campus
Modernization, Calabasas, CA
LACISD Olive View Psychiatric Urgent Care Center Renovation T enant Improvement, Sylmar , CA
LACDPW MLK South Support Building HVAC Replacement,
Compton, CA
Courtyard by Marriott LAX T enant Improvement,
Los Angeles, CA
6344 Arizona Circle, T enant Improvement & Exisitng
Warehouse to Open Office Space Conversion,
Los Angeles, CA
AC Marriott Beverly Hills Adaptive Re-use, Beverly Hills, CA Marriott Residence Inn, Rowland Heights, CA
Hampton Inn & Suites, Hollywood, CA
Home2Suites, Montebello, CA
Rowland Town Center, Rowland Heights, CA
Staybridge Suites, Long Beach, CA
The Source Retail & Hotel, Buena Park, CA
Springhill Suites, Anaheim, CA
AC Marriott Manhattan Beach Entitlement,
Manhattan Beach, CA
Hyatt Place Hyatt House Dual Hotel Entitlement, Ontario, CA March Air Force Base Fitness & T raining Center , Riverside, CA March Air Force Base T rack & Field Facility, Riverside, CA National Intelligence Campus, Kabul, Afghanistan
comPlEtion
In progress
In progress
In progress
In progress
2021
2019
2017
Permitted
2017
2018
In progress
2022
2016
2015
2021
In progress
2011
2011
2012
Section D. Personnel, Equipment & Facilities

OUR TEAM

KEY STAFF

OUR TEAM

KEY STAFF
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Mr. West has more than 40 years of roofing and
waterproofing experience brings deep expertise
in designing, assessing, and implementing
solutions for building envelopes.His extensive
background includes evaluating roof systems,
waterproofing methods, and material
performance in various climates and building
types. Over the decades, he has mastered
a range of techniques, from traditional
roofing methods to modern high-performance
waterproofing systems.

He is skilled at diagnosing complex issues,
such as leaks, water infiltration, and material
degradation, and recommending long-lasting
solutions.His experience also encompasses
coordinating with contractors, ensuring
compliance with industry standards, and
addressing both aesthetic and functional needs
in roofing and waterproofing projects.

For this RFP , he will be responsible for
overseeing the waterproofing and roofing
evaluation of the building, and ensuring that
all findings are accurately documented and
aligned with project goals.

James West
Roofing & Waterproofing
Education
1981-1983 Genesee Community College, Batavia, NY
1978-1981 Manchester High School, Chesterfield, VA
ProfEssional cErtifications & sEminars
1985-Present Attended various material manufacturer sponsored trade shows/seminars to include intensive tours of facilities where roofing/waterproofing products are manufactured.
1983-1985 New Y ork State Contractors’ License
1983-1984 ABC Supply Company, Buffalo, NY
U.S. Intec Corporation Certified Applicator Instructional Program
curriculm vitaE
James West Waterproofing Consultant, Long Beach, CA
November 1997 - Present
Expert Witness: Provide litigation support to include participation in mediation & trial proceedings; deposed numerous times as a designated expert in roofing and waterproofing issues. Consultant: Perform investigations of roofing/waterproofing and related flashings systems to determine current conditions in order to offer recommendations for repair, replacement and maintenance. Quality Control Inspector: Observe and document the step by step removal, replacement and repair of roofing, waterproofing and flashing systems to help ensure proper installation practices/specification compliance. Perform City of Beverly Hills 3rd Party Mandated inspections relating to weather-resistive barriers.

Orchard Roofing Consultants, Santa Ana, CA
May l995 - November 1997
Provided roofing/waterproofing consulting services to include: leak-solving, quality control, litigation support and expert witness testimony.

James West Consulting Services, Long Beach CA
October 1989 - May l994
Owned and operated small business providing roofing and waterproofing consulting to include remedial repairs and maintenance.

Twining Laboratories of Southern California, Inc., Long Beach, CA
November l988 - October l989
Consultant/Quality Control Inspector: Worked in the roofing and waterproofing division which provided consulting services; including investigation, analysis, and specification development/maintenance programs.

Independent Roofing Consultants, Newport Beach, CA
April 1985 - August l988
Quality Control Inspector: Responsible for documentation and coordination of extended and involved roofing and waterproofing projects to include high-end retail centers, high-rise construction and institutional complexes.

OUR TEAM

KEY STAFF
Section D. Personnel, Equipment & Facilities
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section E. Subconsultants

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section E. Subconsultants
ICI ENGINEERS, INC.

MEP Engineering,
Energy
Since 2000, ICI Engineers, Inc. has been providing expertise in mechanical, HVAC, plumbing, electrical and energy
engineering to commercial, healthcare, educational and
institutional sectors.

ICI’s engineers have expertise in the design of entertainment centers, theme parks, K-12 and higher education, healthcare facilities, tenant retrofits, data centers, retail, transportation and commercial buildings. ICI consistently delivers quality, on time, in budget services tailored to meet our clients’ needs.

As professional engineers, our team proactively works with facility owners, architects, developers, design-build groups, energy services organizations and State agencies such as California OSHPD/HCAI and DSA. ICI Engineers is composed of senior professional engineers each with a more than fifteen years of design and staff engineers that have more than five years’ experience.

ICI Engineers also provides peer review, commissioning and value engineering services to insure project code compliance and design integrity. ICI supports project construction with supplemental services of cost estimating, constructability reviews, QA/QC support, MEP coordination, scope
development.

ICI Engineers provides mechanical, electrical and plumbing engineering design work that includes chiller plant and distributions, air handling units, electrical power and lighting, fire alarms, low voltage data services. We also have assisted building facility owners and architects in the development of effective and energy efficient building system projects.

ICI is a graduate US SBA 8(a) program participant since 2018 (cert #303120). Currently certified by the LA MTA, LAUSD separately as a DBE, SBE and MBE.

GROSSMAN & SPEER
ASSOCIATES, INC.

Structural Engineering
Since the firm’s founding
in 1979, we have
successfully completed
over 4,000 projects
that have ranged from
isolated, low budget, cost efficient designs to engineering for large multi-building facilities. Most projects have required conformance with the California Building Code.

Our personnel are experienced in all phases of the design process from initial conception through plan checking and construction. The firm maintains an up-to-date library and current Building Codes, including the Title 24 regulations.

As active design engineers, we are familiar with a wide variety of design requirements and construction practices, which is invaluable when performing constructability reviews, structural evaluations or modernization of existing buildings.

OUR TEAM

SUBCONSULTANTS
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section E. Subconsultants

OUR TEAM

SUBCONSULTANTS

WEBB FOODSERVICE
DESIGN
Kitchen/Food Service
Design
Headquartered in Anaheim, California, Webb Foodservice
Design creates immersive kitchen and dining experiences for civic environments. Since 1989 our team of planners and designers has partnered with clients to bring culinary visions to life; our expertise spans from feasibility studies, concept design, and programming services to market research,
design documentation, and construction administration.

Projects range from small cafes to large, centralized kitchens, with each combining strategy and spectacle to produce
efficient, emotionally engaging front- and back-of-the-house design. Webb excels in solutions that are sustainable and energy-efficient. SBE- and WBENC- certified, the firm has the largest and most diverse team on the West Coast. Senior staff shepherd projects through all phases, including the stringent health and safety protocols of local Environmental Health and DSA.

Our approach to civic projects is rooted in our belief that foodservice plays an important role in affecting social change.

Through our civic practice, we have designed foodservice spaces that range in use from a kitchen supporting the blind enterprise program, to developing a culinary arts program for correctional rehabilitation. Our approach to Food Banks and Transitional Housing focuses on supporting the local community with an emphasis in improving equitable access to food.

PSOMAS
Civil Engineering & Surveying
Dedicated to balancing the natural
and built environment, Psomas
provides sustainably engineered
solutions to public and private sector
clients. As a full-service consulting
firm, we help our clients create value by planning, designing, and delivering complex projects.

Markets served include transportation, water, land
development, and energy with the following services offered:
• Civil engineering
• Survey and geospatial services including the use of
drones, 3D laser scanning, and subsurface utility locating • Site development engineering
• T ransportation and traffic engineering
• Structural engineering
• Water and wastewater engineering
• Environmental planning and resource management
• Land planning and urban design
• Land use entitlements
• Construction management
• GIS consulting
Psomas is a recognized leader and longtime proponent of environmental, social, and economic sustainability and brings a truly holistic approach to our practice and our projects. A founding member of the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure (ISI), Psomas is committed to promoting a progressive standard of sustainability in both design and through company policy.

We currently have over 100 staff who are ENV SPs (Envision Sustainability Professionals through ISI) and/or LEED APs.

The cornerstone of our business approach is to first focus on our client’s long-term needs and then direct our strategic growth accordingly. Our core strength is our multi-disciplined teams of experts—top-notch staff who produce award-
winning projects for our clients through innovation, creativity, and cutting-edge technical expertise.

Founded in 1946, Psomas provides services from offices
throughout California, Arizona, Utah, and Washington.

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

WILSON DAVIS

ASSOCIATES
Landscape Architecture
& Urban Design
Wilson Davis Associates
(Wda!) was founded in
2019 and is a Landscape Architectural Design Firm preparing Conceptual Landscape drawings for project entitlements, Construction Documents for bidding and construction and Construction Administration during construction. Wda! has two licensed Landscape Architects and two staff members that help with production drawings and an Office Manager.

Wda! has designed projects in Northern California / Bay Area to San Diego County and east to Las Vegas and Phoenix areas. The projects include both the Public and Private sectors involving Parks, Plazas, Streetscapes, Commercial Retail, Office, Single Family detached housing, High Density Housing / Apartments, Industrial and Institutional.

Wilson Davis Associates (Wda!) prides itself on the ability to consistently provide quality landscape design. What is of equal importance to us is the capacity to give our clients a creative product; “on time and within budget.”
The Wda! approach unites concerned and talented
professionals who work together to ensure quality at
every stage of the project, from research and analysis to design development, from construction documents to field observation. Every consideration is given to all of those who may be involved with the project: investors, municipalities, other consultants, and the ultimate user. The result is a product that meets each of our client’s unique requirements in terms of budget, schedule and marketability...and, of course, meets our goal of providing quality landscape design services.

KPJ CONSULTING
Cost Estimating
Founded in 2014,
KPJ Consulting, an S
Corporation is LSBE/MBE/
WBE certified. KPJ Consulting is especially skilled in providing accurate budgets at the early programming and conceptual phases of a project when that accuracy is critical to a project’s ultimate success. KPJ Consulting achieves this with early advice during the design phase by creating functional solutions to meet budget expectations.

KPJ has firsthand experience to analyze and understand the design solutions researched by design teams and user groups.

KPJ can forecast the “unforeseen” cost implications for each design solution. KPJ finally appraises the solutions are measured, evaluated, and presented in easy to comprehend format. KPJ understands the critical current market conditions in the project location is an essential factor in providing an accurate estimate. At the early design phase, KPJ obtains key quotes from vendors for uniquely specified items. When a current event impacts the construction industry, KPJ will often research the dynamics of that impact to determine the cost considerations for your project.

KPJ Consulting
Section E. Subconsultants

OUR TEAM

SUBCONSULTANTS
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section E. Subconsultants

OUR TEAM

SUBCONSULTANTS

RES & ASSOCIATES

CONSULTING ENGINEERS,
INC.

Electrical Engineering
RES & Associates Consulting
Engineers, Inc., has responded to
the demands of the construction
community for more than 15 years. We are a professional engineering firm capable of providing
the highest quality of full-scope electrical engineering services. Our firm is built upon the strength
of its principals and goes beyond merely providing quality documents. Our services are provided
with an exceptional amount of personal detail and attention.

Our consulting design services include
new construction, renovations, and property condition
reports.

RES & Associates strives to provide the best services available to efficiently and reliably serve the
needs of our clients. Providing engineering services is an integral aspect of this goal as today’s
technological advancements and design criteria demand an ever-increasing standard of excellence.

All projects receive hands-on contact from our principal. All resources of the firm and its
consultants are always at our client’s disposal. We have been providing such services since our
formation and take pride in our ability to offer a dependable and knowledgeable staff with the
necessary expertise and experience to meet the challenges of our varied projects.

RES & Associates provides a means to a well-coordinated team effort. From the first interview,
until job completion, a senior member of the firm is totally involved. We are proud to offer you
the unique combination of expertise, experience and
approach that have brought us the success
that was the target of our initial goals.

BAINBRIDGE
ENVIRONMENTAL Inc.

Electrical Engineering
Founded in 1992, for over
thirty-three (33) years,
Bainbridge has been providing
environmental consulting services to Public Agencies,
Educational Institutions, Cities, and private industries throughout Southern California. Bainbridge has diligently provided hazardous materials consulting services, including but not limited to asbestos containing materials (ACM), and lead-based paint (LBP). Our services have included
inspections, surveys, sampling, abatement plan specifications, and other indoor air quality (IAQ) inspections, abatement/ remediation monitoring and clearances.

Our Specific Consulting Services include but not limited to:
• Asbestos Bulk Sampling
• Lead Paint Chip Sampling
• Lead X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) T esting
• SCAQMD Procedure 5 clean-up plans
• Cost Estimates, Working Drawings and CAD
• Construction/Abatement /Remediation Monitoring
• On-Site laboratory asbestos analysis NIOSH 582
• Mold/Fungi Studies and Assessments
• Humidity- Moisture Studies and Mapping
• Water Intrusion Studies
• Remediation Work Plans and Project Design
• Building/Degradation Studies for Mold Amplification
• Mold Prevention Building Design (Non-Architectural)
• Operations and Maintenance Programs
• Concrete Moisture T esting
• Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments (ESA)
• Bacteria - Water Assessments and Management
Bainbridge has completed thousands of projects related to modernization, renovation, maintenance and
operations and repair of structure facilities and institutions.

Projects completed have included occupied and
vacant/abandoned buildings such as historical parks,
recreational centers, senior citizen and assisted living communities, libraries, k-12 public schools, college
campuses, universities, and government offices.

1 Psomas

Jeff Chess has 31 years of design and
management experience covering civil,
structural, and environmental engineering.

He has managed services for numerous
public clients, including municipalities
leading design efforts involving critical public outreach support. He has overseen, prepared, and managed civil engineering design and studies involving stormwater, wastewater, roadway, and site civil for numerous public and institutional projects and programs. Jeff has extensive experience in dealing with land development’s environmental aspects, encompassing hazardous waste mitigation, BMP implementation, and environmental report contribution. He also has ample experience in permitting and approvals with most Southern California cities and counties and many state and local agencies. Also, Jeff leads our Engineering Group’s Quality Initiative.

Responsibilities include chairing our Culture of Quality Committee, responsible for developing and implementing quality enhancement policies and procedures for Psomas’ Engineering Group company- wide.

Experience
Los Angeles Community College District, Measure J Utility Master Plan – Los Angeles, CA: Project Manager for providing professional services for the utility and infrastructure master plan in support of the Proposition A/AA and Measure J development programs and followed on with complete design of campus-wide utility systems, parking lots, and roadways. Civil engineering services included campuswide utility infrastructure analysis for the domestic/fire water system, storm drain/stormwater management system, and sanitary sewer system. Campuses included: Los Angeles Mission College, Los Angeles Pierce College, and Los Angeles Valley College.

Los Angeles Pierce College, Utility Master Plan Update – Woodland Hills, CA: Project Manager for providing professional services to update the campus-wide Utility Master plan which considered several new projects not included in the previous plan. The scope of services included a utility capacity study with recommendations for utility construction documents. The utility systems included storm drains, sanitary sewer, domestic water, fire/water, and irrigation systems.

REGISTRATION
2001/CA/Professional
Engineer/Civil/61632

EDUCATION
1993/BS/Civil
Engineering/University of Southern
California

CERTIFICATIONS
Envision Sustainability
Professional/Institute for
Sustainable Infrastructure
Qualified SWPPP
Developer/Stormwater Multiple
Application and Report Tracking
System/C61632

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers,
Los Angeles Section
Construction Management
Association of America, Southern
California Chapter
University of Southern California,
Architectural Guild
Asian American
Architects/Engineers Association

EXPERIENCE
With Psomas for 22 years; with
other firms for 9 years

Jeff Chess, PE, QSD, ENV
SP
Principal-in-Charge – Psomas

2 JEFF CHESS, PE, QSD,
ENV SP
(continued)

2 Psomas
El Camino College, Shops, Stadium, and Industry Technology Utility Mapping Update – Torrance, CA: Project Manager
responsible for civil engineering and survey services, including preparation of utility mapping for three project sites, subsurface investigation, and engineering analysis of field data collected compared and reconciled with record data.

Los Angeles Mission College, Measure J Stormwater Master Plan Master Plan – Los Angeles, CA: Project Manager provided a comprehensive Storm Water Master Plan document to assess stormwater quality, quantity, and drainage patterns as related to the college’s programmed build-out and phasing. The plan outlined prescriptive temporary and permanent BMP measures to ensure compliance with NPDES requirements through all phases of the campus build-out.

City of Los Angeles, Proposition O Implementation, Imperial Highway Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP) – Los Angeles, CA: Team Leader provided civil engineering services retrofitting approximately 1.3 miles of Imperial the Highway, a watershed area between Pershing Drive to California Street, with a sunken median infiltration system. These stormwater best management practices (BMPs) remove soluble and particulate pollutants from runoff before they flow onto Dockweiler State Beach.

City of Beverly Hills, Beverly Gardens Park – Beverly Hills, CA:

Team Leader for providing civil engineering design services and construction support for the reconstruction of 21 blocks of the existing historic linear park. The scope of services focused on grading and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance.

Historic pergolas were analyzed for the structural condition and repairs were recommended. The park is tied into new biofiltration swales built for an adjacent roadway project.

City of Santa Clarita, Central Park Build Out – Santa Clarita, CA:

Principal-in-Charge for this project which includes eight acres of area development to include four additional multi-purpose fields, complete with lighting, restrooms, concessions, and additional passive and active recreational opportunities. Psomas was responsible for civil engineering services of the existing field, existing dog park and walkways, surrounding asphalt parking areas, and hillside areas for future park installations.

David March Park Phase II Improvements – Santa Clarita, CA:

Project Manager for this project which included a baseball field, basketball court, restroom building, community
gathering area, and an additional parking lot. The
development area is just over six acres, and a majority of the project is adjacent to the existing park. Psomas successfully

3 JEFF CHESS, PE, QSD,
ENV SP
(continued)

3 Psomas
integrated the existing park with additional parking, walking paths, trails, upgrades to the existing park, landscaping, and site furnishing.

Psomas was also responsible for establishing survey controls, calculating the record boundary, collecting existing ground visible utilities, and a topographical design survey of the existing park and field, including the surrounding hillside areas.

Milton Street Park – Los Angeles, CA: Project Manager for providing civil engineering design for a new 1.2-acre urban park alongside the Ballona Creek Bike Trail. The park includes native plantings, bird-watching platforms, bike trail enhancements, seating areas, outdoor picnic areas, and an onsite stormwater capture and treatment system. Public improvements included green street measures within the Milton Street right-of-way abutting the park site, including new landscape, hardscape, and stormwater management facilities.

1 Psomas

Daniel Rahe has 23 years of professional
land surveying experience on projects
ranging in size from parking garages to large
master-planned communities. In his current
role as Senior Project Surveyor , Dan is responsible for survey project management, agency and field survey coordination, proposal writing and estimating, as well as preparing tentative, final, and parcel maps.

Experience
Chaffey Community College District, Campuswide Design Survey – Rancho Cucamonga Campus and Chino Campus, CA: Project Manager providing campus-wide design survey services including aerial topographic survey map, boundary survey, encumbrance mapping, utility mapping, and accessibility design survey. ) California Department of General Services, Fairview
Developmental Center – Costa Mesa, CA: Project Manager
providing civil engineering and surveying services in support of DGS’s evaluation of future uses of the facility. Scope of services included aerial topographic mapping, ALTA survey, record of survey, review of available record drawings, traffic studies, hydrology study, evaluation of projected demands and available capacity of existing facilities to serve them, and preparation of land use and infrastructure master plans. As part of the project, modeling of the proposed backbone domestic/fire and sanitary system was completed. The sanitary sewer modeling used the Costa Mesa Sanitary District methodology.

Downey Unified School District, Topographic Design Surveys – Downey, CA: Survey Manager for conducting design surveying services under the current Bond program to fund repairs, upgrades, and new construction on Downey Unified School District campuses including Sussman Middle School, Columbus High School, and Warren High School.

East Whittier School District, Campuswide Design Surveys – Whittier, CA: Project Manager for design surveys for the 2020 Summer Modernization project at several elementary and middle schools in the East Whittier City School District. The schools included Hillview, Granada, and East Whittier Middle Schools, and

REGISTRATION
2017/CA/Professional Land
Surveyor/9425

EDUCATION
2001/Coursework/Political
Science/University of Northern
Colorado

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Land Surveyors Association of
California

EXPERIENCE
With Psomas for 8 years; with other
firms for 16 years

Daniel Rahe, PLS
Project Manager, Senior Project Surveyor – Psomas

2 DANIEL RAHE, PLS
(continued)

2 Psomas
Mulberry, Evergreen, Ocean View, Orchard Dale, Ceres, and Leffingwell Elementary Schools.

El Camino College, New Music Building (Music Building
Replacement) Survey Service – Torrance, CA: Project Manager provided land surveying service for the new 66,580 GSF Music Building with an estimated construction budget of $35.5 million.

Psomas’ scope of services included the preparation of a design survey and substructure utility detecting (SUE) services.

Los Angeles Unified School District, Vanalden Early Education Center – Tarzana, CA: Project Manager provided land surveying services for the facility that serves as a daycare center for those in the Los Angeles Unified School District, serving up to 115 children each. The Vanalden Early Education project includes a limited design survey for underground utility locations. Psomas provided a survey map, streets right of way, easements, utility detection, several upgrades, and a color-coded subsurface utility deliverable provided to the client.

Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center Campus Renovation – Downey, CA: Project Manager for providing
professional services for Rancho Los Amigos, a 187-acre campus, expanding from 40 acres to 70 acres, shifting 3,000 jobs, and accommodating various county services within one private campus.

The campus also provides publicly accessible open space for the neighboring community and end-users. Psomas provided survey and civil engineering services on the Design-Build contract for Phase 1 of this campus development. Services included the construction of three new buildings, the realignment and improvement of the entry drive known as Leeds Street, stormwater quality treatment, and a large central public park. Additional survey services included construction staking for buildings, building additions, structural footings, wet and dry utilities, and finish grades.

City of LA, Civil Engineering and Design Support Services for StreetsLA (TOS 702) – Los Angeles, CA: Survey Manager for this StreetLA project to provide improvements to over 250 ramps. As a subconsultant to MGE, Psomas’ scope includes surveying 250 ramps, utility coordination, curb ramp design, design services during construction, and construction management support services. The Psomas team services included 35%, 65%, 95%, and 100% PS&E plans for all LADOT curb ramps. The team follows a timely schedule and continues to remain within budget.

GROSSMAN & SPEER ASSOCIATES, INC.

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS

RESUME: Derrick Masulis, S.E.

License # SE 6228
EDUCATION:
2008-2009 University of California at Los Angeles
M.S. Degree, Structural Engineering
2003-2008 University of California at Los Angeles
B.S. Degree, Civil Engineering
EMPLOYMENT:
2020-Present Grossman & Speer Associates, Inc., Glendale, California President
2015-2020 Grossman & Speer Associates, Inc., Glendale, California Principal
2010-2015 Grossman & Speer Associates, Inc., Glendale, California Project Engineer
2008 Murray Engineers, Palo Alto, California – Lab Tech 2007 City of Milpitas Permit Center, Milpitas, California – Intern

EXPERTISE:

Seismic analysis and design of concrete, masonry, steel and wood structures, seismic evaluation studies, seismic rehabilitation, engineering reports, multi-story, retaining walls, pile foundations, commercial, governmental, industrial, manufacturing, and schools. Mr. Masulis has been Project Engineer and Engineer of Record on public school and college projects. He has experience working with the Division of State Architect on public school projects including design approval, addenda, change orders and closeout. Mr. Masulis’ structural engineering career spans over 14 years and is focused on providing quality structural engineering consulting with an emphasis on seeing projects through to completion.

ASSOCIATIONS:
2015-Present Structural Engineers Association of Southern California, Member 2019-Present American Society of Civil Engineers, Member 2019-Present International Code Council, Member
LICENSES:
2015 Structural Engineer, California
2015 Civil Engineer, Washington
2011 Civil Engineer, California
GROSSMAN & SPEER ASSOCIATES, INC.

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS

RESUME: Andrew Schluter, S.E.

License # SE 7200

EDUCATION:
2010-2014 University of California at Los Angeles
B.S. Degree, Civil Engineering

EMPLOYMENT:
2019-Present Grossman & Speer Associates, Inc., Glendale, California Principal
2014-2019 Grossman & Speer Associates, Inc., Glendale, California Project Engineer
2013 University of California at Los Angeles
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering - Course Reader

EXPERTISE:

Seismic analysis and design of concrete, masonry, steel and wood structures, seismic evaluation studies, seismic rehabilitation, value engineering, cost studies, preliminary engineering reports, multi-story, retaining walls, pile foundations, commercial, governmental, industrial, manufacturing, and schools. Mr. Schluter has worked on many public school and college projects requiring Division of State Architect approval which included design approval, construction change documents and closeout. Mr. Schluter’s career spans over 10 years and aims to uphold the quality of work provided by Grossman & Speer since its founding.

ASSOCIATIONS:
2013-Present American Society of Civil Engineers
Member

LICENSES:
2023 Structural Engineer, California
2017 Civil Engineer, California

City of Santa Clarita RFP – Former Senior Center Building Assessment Individual Resume-Joe C. Ablay

Joe C. Ablay, P.E., CEM, CEA, GBE
Senior Mechanical/Plumbing Engineer
Office: (909) 967-0236
E-mail: [email protected]

Mr. Ablay has more than 3 5 years of extensive engineering design and commissioning experience that involves large and complex projects in transportation, commercial, institutional, industrial, and government facilities. He is the founding president of ICI Engineers, Inc. Pr ior to founding ICI, he spearheaded major performance contracting organizations and developed several state facilities project programs that ha ve been very successful in energy savings , infrastructure assessment, modernization, and upgrades. He has profound experience in comprehensive facility energy audit, commissioning process development, energy conservation measures development, system design, energy analysis and modelling. He has established a good working relationship with authority jurisdiction such as OSHPD, DSA, AFCEE Title 1& 2, counties and cities.

One of his most outstanding project with LA Metro is the recently awarded LEED Gold certified Division 20 Location 64 Project, as the responsible Commissioning Authority (CxA).

Some other engineering design that he had successfully built and fully operational include, Aquarium of the Pacific in Long Beach, Caesar’s Palace Central Cooling and Heating Plant in Nevada, K -12 of LAUSD, UCLA Healthcare buildings, LA Metro Transportation facilities, and US -Air Force Base facilities.

Registrations/Certifications
• Registered Professional Engineer and NCEES record holder in the states of California, Nevada, Utah, Iowa, Washington, Tea, and Florida.
• Certified Energy Manager, Certified Energy Auditor, Green Building Engineer and Certified Sustainable Development Professional
Affiliations
• Los Angeles County Metro Transportation Authority (LA Metro) Sustainability Council - Board Member, June 2019-2020
• American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), Past Director of Southern California Chapter
• Member: Society of American Engineers, Association of Energy Engineers, American Society of Plumbing Engineers, American Society of Healthcare Engineers, California Society of Healthcare Engineers, US Green Building Council, IAPMO

Education
• B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, 1978, University of the East, Manila, Philippines • HVAC & Plumbing Systems Designs, 1986, UCLA
• Fire Protection System Design, 1989, NFPA
• Cogeneration Design, University of Wisconsin, 2000
• Graduate, Executive Program in Management, 2003, The Anderson School of Business, UCLA

Individual Resume-Joe C. Ablay

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

Los Angeles County MTA Division 20 Westside Subway Extension Location 64-LEED Enhanced Commissioning Authority (CxA)

LEED Enhanced CxA for the construction of new 80,000 SF Location 64 rail support and maintenance facility. The facility had achieved LEED Gold certification. The commissioning included design phase and construction phase.

Reviewed design documents to ensure Owner’s Project Requirement was fully complied with incorporated into design documents. Developed commissioning plans and specifications.

Developed commissioning pre -functional checklists and functional performance tests. Reviewed contractor submittal and work plan. Developed close out reports for final submission to owner.

Los Angeles County LAC-USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 7 Building Campus Energy Audit and Assessment

Performed comprehensive site building facility assessment and energy audit on 7 buildings with estimated total area of 1.10 -Million square feet. The scop e of work is for complete field visit, assessment of all the HVAC equipment, lighting and controls. It was discovered that the existing steam and chilled water piping underground/tunnel utilities has deteriorated insulations and leakages.

A. Central cooling and heating plant – modeled new steam plant and chilled water plant equipment. The assessment report was the basis of the bid documents for construction.

B. Old Main Hospital Building – 1929 built (replaced with new CHAI compliant building) C. Medical office building and Old Women’s Children Hospital D. Out-Patient Building, Medical Examiner and Pharmacy Shops

Eva Care Inc. Rehab & Services, Fillmore, CA
Greenfield Care Center MEP/S Feasibility Study

The existing skilled nursing facility building was built in 1972. The facility is a single-story building, 99-beds, 1-2 occupancy and V -A fully sprinklered construction type. The building cooling and heating system is served by one chiller and one hot water heating boiler mounted on the roof. Each patient room is served by a fan coil with control thermostat. The fan coil unit cooling and heating is served by a 2 -pipe system configuration. This configuration means that cooling and heating can only happen one at a time and cannot be simultaneous. ICI performed a feasibility study to use packaged roof top gas -electric air conditioning units in lieu of the chiller and boiler plant as well as replacement of the 40 existing old fan coils with single coil to new fa n coils with 2 coils for 4 -pipe system use. The feasibility report was based on all applicable CA and local codes, provided comparative review of the operations maintenance cost and Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimate for two (2) alternatives.

Blacksmith.TV – Culver, CA
Los Angeles Office Architectural, Engineering & Structural Assessment The building was designed and constructed in 1952 as a single -story brick masonry & wood framing building. Project scope includes a comprehensive mechanical/HVAC, and plumbing evaluation of the existing conditions for code compliance.

The building evaluation consists of (1) review of existing mechanical and plumbing systems and provide recommendations for upgrades and replacements of analyzed systems; (2) a Rough Order of Magnitude cost estimate describing the recommended remediation to use in budgeting remediation scope for the proposed improvements.

Resume

Rolando Sotelo, P.E.

Principal
Electrical Engineer
RES & Associates Consulting
Engineers Inc.

Tel: (661) 373-0584
E-mail:[email protected]

Mr. Sotelo has nearlu 35 years of professional electrical engineering, project management, and construction experience relating to the electrical building industry. Over the years, he has designed electrical systems for low and high rise buildings, tenant improvement projects, manufacturing facilities,
computer centers, airport operations, colleges, elementary and high schools, industrial facilities, healthcare and
telecommunication facilities.

Mr. Sotelo has practical electrical construction, construction management and construction administration experience. Over the years, Mr. Sotelo developed electrical load studies, design criteria, due diligence reports, cost estimates, schedules, construction bid drawings, specifications and peer review.

Mr. Sotelo was been involved in educational master planning of infrastructure systems for several K-12 school districts and community colleges. His more recent work also includes electrical designs for several multi-family and adaptive reuse projects. Mr.

Sotelo previously designed new healthcare, government, institutional, correctional and municipal facilities.

Mr. Sotelo has managed an electrical department of 15 engineers, designers, and drafters. He has also designed infrastructure high voltage power systems for hospitals and community colleges.

Education
UCLA: Electrical Engineering
CSULB: BSEE & Graduate Courses
in Electrical Engineering 1989

PE Registration
EE, California – E17229
EE, Arizona – E48795
NCEES Record

Membership
National Society of Professional Engineers
(NSPE)
California Society of Professional Engineers
(CSPE)
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
(IEEE)
RES & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.
21821 Denise Lane, Santa Clarita, CA 91390

RES & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Relevant & Current Projects

Senior Center/Skilled Nursing Facilities
Alhambra Healthcare and Wellness Center,
Alhambra, CA
Manor Senior Apartments, Pasadena, CA
Park Anaheim Wellness Center, Anaheim, CA
HCR Manorcare, Fountain Valley, CA
Manorcare Hemet, Hemet, CA
HCR Manorcare, Palm Desert, CA

SCV Bridge to Home | Homeless Shelter
(2022-2024)
23031 Drayton Street
Santa Clarita, California 2022-2024
Size: 25KSF: 2 story 16 rooms

Front Porch Sunny View Manor |
Retirement Home (2020-Present)
Nurse Call Replacement
Dining Room Interior Renovation
Cupertino, California 2023-Present
Size: 5KSF: 1 story Dining Room

Recent & Current Projects

Ronald Reagan University MC (2022-
2024)
6505 PET/CT
2nd Floor Cath Lab 3
2nd Floor Cath Lab 1
P-8 IDF Receptacles Upgrade
Helipad Replacement
Temp Sewage Pump Ejector
MP200 6th Floor OR Room Upgrade
MP200 Battery Replacement

Santa Monica University MC (2022-2024)
MNP AHU-8 Replacement
A544 ED Digital X-ray Replacement
Magnetom Avanto 2350 MRI Upgrade
Room 2115 EOS Bone Density Replacement
MNP 1478 Spec CT
MNP AH-5 Replacement P1 Level
AH-1 and AH-2 Replacement
AH-4 Replacement

Amoretti - Noushib, Inc.

Oxnard, California 2019-Present
Size: 23KSF: Warehouse and Cold Storage Build
Out with new offices, main electrical service,
lighting, 35° 88 KFt3 cooler, and -10° 47 KFt3
Freezer.

Alhambra Healthcare & Wellness Centre
Alhambra, California 2019-Present
Size: 20KSF: Emergency Generator Replacement
& Sub-Acute Project.

Plum Canyon Retail Center
Santa Clarita, California 2018-Present
Size: 485KSF: Retail Center with 5 multi-tenant buildings.

Main services, Grey shell services and site lighting and power.

Oasis Ave K & 10th St.

Lancaster, California 2018
Size: 200KSF: Retail Center with 4 multi-tenant buildings.

Main services, Grey shell services and site lighting and power.

La Sierra Retail Center
Riverside, California 2018
Size: 25KSF: Retail Building with 4 tenants. Main service, Grey shell services and site lighting and power.

LA Turbine
Santa Clarita, California 2018 Size: 20KSF:

Manufacturing machine shop.

Valencia Travel Village
Santa Clarita, California 2018 Size: 2000A Service
upgrade and RVspace distribution.

NTS
Santa Clarita, California 2018 Size: 5KSF: New
shaker building 2000 amp 480/477V. Documenting
existing site electrical system.

Gratitude Charter School
Los Angeles, California 2018-Present
Size: 25KSF: 2 story 16 Classrooms

Grit Charter School
Los Angeles, California 2018-Present
Size: 25KSF: 2 story 16 Classrooms

Fillmore Care Center
Fillmore, California 2018
Size: 25KSF: 1 story HVAC upgrade

Whole Foods
Santa Clarita, California 2018 Bakery area remodel.

Chef Toys
Pasadena, California 2018 Size: 20KSF: Retail
space renovation.

Car Wash and Auto Shop
Lakewood, California 2018 Size: 20KSF: 2 single
story buildings.

Reyes Winery
Newhall, California 2018-Present
Size: 15KSF: 3 story restaurant, and bar.

RES & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.

LAPO/FOLA Mall
Carson, California 2017-2019
Size: 800KSF new retail mall; Currently in
permitting process. Partnered with another
mechanical engineer. High voltage design
with 16KV system, 4- 3750kva
12kV/480V transformers and 480/277V
5000A services. All site lighting, common
area and shell design to tenants. Design
done in Revit. Cost $1B

LAX – MSC Midfield Satellite Concourse
Los Angeles, California 2017
Size: 750KSF: Provide building standards
based on LAWA facility engineer’s
interviews. Review design engineer’s
documents for compliance. Cost $1B

Marina Market Place
Marina Del Rey, California 2018
New 2000A 480/277V Service Addition.

Grace Baptist Church
Santa Clarita, California 2018
Size: 20KSF: 2 story building JR/HS Center

Higher Ground Day Care
Santa Clarita, California 2018
Size: 10KSF: 1- story Daycare Center.

Master’s University
Santa Clarita, California 2018
Size: 15KSF: 3 one story building
renovations Teachers Buildings.

Canyon Plastics
Santa Clarita, California 2018
Size: 20KSF: 2000 amp 480/277V
service upgrade and machine shop.

808 Broadway
Downtown LA, California 2017
Size: 40KSF: 8 story building renovated
live/work spaces.

Copper Hill Medical Office Building
Los Angeles, California 2018
Size: 30KSF: 2 two-story buildings Shell and TI’s.

Magic Mountain Blvd. & McBean
Santa Clarita, California 2018
Size: 20KSF: 1 story buildings Shell and TI’s.

RES & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Recent Project Experience K-12

Simi Valley Unified School District
HVAC Equipment Replacement
White Oak ES, Mountain View ES, Madera ES,
Crestview ES, Garden Grove ES, Knolls Ave ES,
Park View ES, Valley View MS
Simi Valley, California 2017
Size: Various SF; The scope of work including replacing the existing HVAC units with new ones.

The electrical engineering design for power included
providing new branch circuits from existing panels and load calcs. The low voltage systems design included the conduits for the HVAC controls and the integration with the existing Fire Alarm system. The HVAC shut-down method varied by
school depending on the existing Fire Alarm system and the new HVAC controls design.

Trinity Classical Academy
2-Story Classroom and Multi-purpose Room
Renovation for K thru HS
Santa Clarita, California 2017
Size: 15,000 SF Cost: $1M Remodel to the existing space in a 2-story classroom and worship building. The project scope included addition of new partitions to create 17 new
classrooms and remodel of existing multi-purpose room with Theatrical Lighting. Demolition of some existing partitions, re-appropriation of existing HVAC and reuse of existing lighting fixtures. The school serves students from K through grade 12. The electrical engineering design included power and low voltage systems. Signal and communication systems designs included public address, corrective clock, television, security, public address, and fire alarm. This remodel is phase 1 of a larger scope of work that includes a new 73KSF $10M school building with a multi-purpose building. We are currently working on the design of the new school building.

Additional Projects:

Educational
 West Covina Unified School District
Merced and Orangewood ES Modernizations
 Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District
Relocatable Classrooms
 Rosemead Unified School District
Master Planning Infrastructure
 El Monte Unified School District
District Maintenance Facilities
 Pasadena Unified School District
Sierra Madre ES
 Los Angeles Unified School District
New Schools
Central LA Learning Complex #1
Gratts Elementary School
Safety & Technology Projects
Gulf St. ES,Eshelman Ave. ES,Park Western
Ave. ES,Locke Ave. SHS,Gompers Ave. MS
Harbor City ES,Carson St. ES,Leland St. ES
Annalee Ave. ES,Chapman St. ES,Purche St.

ES
Fire Alarm System Upgrade Projects
Gulf St. ES,Locke Ave. SHS,Gompers Ave.

MS,Harbor City ES,Carson St. ES,Annalee Ave.

ES,Chapman St. ES,Purche St. ES, LeConte MS

Building Renovation Projects
 The Westwood Center Westwood, Ca.
 535 N. Brand, Glendale Ca.
 333 South Hope St., LA Ca.

Tenant Improvements
 California Plaza 2A
350 S. Grand Ave.
 1999 Avenue of the Stars
Century City CA
 California Plaza 1A
300 S. Grand Ave.
 Martin Luther King Drew Medical Center
Women’s Clinic

Commercial Construction Projects
 407 N. Maple Office Building Beverly Hills, Ca.
 Burbank Empire Office Building Burbank, Ca.
 Farmers & Merchants Bank Long Beach, Ca.
 Chipotle Restaurants Various Locations
 Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation
Adventure Park Multipurpose Bldg.

Aerospace and Aviation
 Airborne Express Inc., Maintenance & Operations
Long Beach Airport
Ontario Airport
LAX
San Diego Airport
San Jose Airport
 Lockheed Martin Skunkworks, Palmdale, Ca.
 Hughes Aircraft, El Segundo, Ca.
 LAX Terminals T4, T5, T6 Renovation
 LAX New Baggage Facility
 LAX Tom Bradley International Terminal Renovation

Fire Stations
 FS#65 Los Angeles, CA
 FS#21 Los Angeles, CA
 FS#89 Los Angeles, CA
 FS#62 Los Angeles, CA
 FS#4 Los Angeles, CA
 Lompoc Sheriff/Fire Station
 Lakewood Sheriff Station

Correctional
 Metro Detention Center Los Angeles, CA
 Los Angeles Police Headquarters Los Angeles, CA
RES & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Higher Education
 El Camino College Infrastructure Design Torrance, CA  Los Angeles Valley College Building Renovation
 Pierce College New Science Building
 Occidental College , Eagle Rock, CA
Library Building Improvement
 California State University, Northridge, CA
Engineering Building Improvements
 Maxine Waters, LA, CA
Employment Preparation Center
 Long Beach City College, Long Beach CA
Peer Review for Academic Bldg. Renovation
 Los Angeles City College, Solar Power Installation

Government (California Dept. of General Serv. -DGS)
 Veteran’s Admin. Nursing Home Ventura, CA
 Veteran’s Admin. Nursing Home Lancaster, CA
 Veteran’s Admin. Main Nursing Home West Los
Angeles, CA
 Seymore Johnson AFB, Raleigh, NC (2010)
 Laughlin AFB, Del Rio, TX (2010)
Retail
 Promenade Mall Woodland Hills Building Renovation
 American Girl Place The Grove Los Angeles CA
 West Covina Mall Renovation, West Covina, CA
 Metreon Mall, San Francisco, CA (2010)

Healthcare
 Sharp Memorial Hospital, San Diego, CA
 Glendale Adventist Hospital, Glendale, CA
 Simi Valley Hospital, Simi Valley, CA
 Cedars Sinai Medical Center (2010)
 UCLA Santa Monica & Ronald Reagan MC’s
(2010,2022)

Religious & Worship
 New Life Church, Oxnard, CA
 New Life Church, Newhall, CA
 Real Life Church, Newhall , CA
 Higher Vision Church, Valencia, CA
 Grace Baptist Church

Historical Landmarks
 The Walker House, San Dimas, CA

Senior Centers/Skilled Nursing Facilities
 Alhambra Healthcare and Wellness Center, Alhambra, CA  Manor Senior Apartments, Pasadena, CA
 Park Anaheim Wellness Center, Anaheim, CA
 HCR Manorcare, Fountain Valley, CA
 Manorcare Hemet, Hemet, CA
 HCR Manorcare, Palm Desert, CA
 Magnolia Gardens Skilled Nursing Facility, Granada Hills, CA  Lakewood Park Healthcenter, Downey, CA
 Fresno Rehabilitation Center of Fresno, Fresno,CA

KEY PERSONELL

TIM DAVIS, PRINCIPAL

EDUCATION:

BS, Landscape Architecture - 1984
School of Environmental Design
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

EXPERIENCE:

Tim is a Licensed Landscape Architect with 38 years of experience. Tim oversees all aspects of the landscape design process, business development, proposal development, marketing assistance, staff training and project reviews, Computer Aided Drafting and Design (CADD) which encompasses a comprehensive scope of services such as: preliminary design concepts, construction documents, and on the job site observation duties of evaluating of the landscape contractors installation practices of irrigation mainline pressure tests, irrigation system coverage test, plant material selection and placement in compliance with public agency and landscape industry standards to minor grading adjustments due to site constraints and limitations and necessary construction observation reports.

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION

CA LIC #3353

PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS:

American Society of Landscape Architects, Past Chairperson Design Review Board Member, City of Riverside, Unforgettables Foundation, City of Riverside Chamber of Commerce

BENJAMIN MONTRELLA, PRINCIPAL/PROJECT MANAGER

EDUCATION:

Utah State University - 2003
Bachelor of Landscape Architecture
Department Landscape Architecture/Environmental Planning

EXPERIENCE:

Ben is a Self-Employed landscape architect offering design services and continuing as consulting landscape architect for a variety of clients and projects in Southern California, Utah and Nevada.

Typical work includes Construction Documents, Concept Plans. Projects range from large and small scale single and multi-family residential, live/work, mixed-use, commercial/retail, high-end estates, urban infill, various types of affordable housing, and landscape maintenance districts/R.O.W.

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LICENSURE: CA, NV, UT & AZ

STEVEN SANHAMEL, PROJECT MANAGER

EDUCATION:

BS, Landscape Architecture - 1993
School of Environmental Design
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

EXPERIENCE:

Steven is a Licensed Landscape Architect with over 25 years of experience. Steven oversees all aspects of the landscape design process which encompasses a comprehensive scope of services such as: preliminary design concepts, construction documents, and on the job site observation duties of evaluating of the landscape contractors installation practices of irrigation mainline pressure tests, irrigation system coverage test, plant material selection and placement in compliance with public agency and landscape industry standards to minor grading adjustments due to site constraints and limitations and necessary construction observation reports.

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION

CA LIC #4352

City of Santa Clarita Bainbridge Environmental Consultants, Inc.

RFP CIP-24-25-F0006 Former Senior Center Building Assessment October 8, 2024 For Fremer Architects
14251 Firestone Blvd., Suite 140, La Mirada, CA 90638 • Tel (213) 921-4884 • Fax (714) 247-0025

PROPOSED PERSONNEL/FIRM TEAM

HENRY
MORENO

PRINCIPAL | PROGRAM MANGER

CERTIFICATIONS
• State of California Certified Asbestos
Consultant No. 92-0618/03-3494

• State of California Department of
Public Health Lead Related
Inspector/Assessor No. LRC-00000118

• Council-certified Indoor
Environmental Consultant I (CIEC) No.
1806006

• Bachelor of Architecture – University
of Miami 1983

EXPERIENCE:
• L.A. Dept of Public Works
• L.A. County Internal Services Division
• Guidewire/Golden Living Center
• University of California, L.A. (UCLA)
• City of Los Angeles
• City of Santa Monica
• City of San Jacinto
• U.S. General Services Administration
(GSA)
• Long Beach Unified School District
• Los Angeles Unified School District
• San Bernardino City Unified School
District
• Irvine Unified School District
• Los Alamitos Unified School District
• Mt. San Antonio Community College
• Garden Grove Unified School District
• Santa Ana Unified School District
• Irvine Company
• Sunstone Investment Properties

EXPERIENCE

Founder and Principal/Program Manager of Bainbridge Environmental Consultants Inc. (Bainbridge). With a career spanning over four decades, he possesses a unique blend of knowledge and expertise in both the architectural/construction fields and industrial hygiene/environmental fields. Mr. Moreno's leadership has been instrumental in successfully overseeing numerous projects involving inspections, abatement/remediation design, and project
management. He has also provided invaluable expert testimony, offering support to clients facing regulatory, legal, and contractual business litigation related to indoor air quality concerns, such as asbestos, lead, mold, and other regulated materials. Notably, Mr.

Moreno's input has been sought in cases involving change orde rs, RFI's, and contractual disputes for large -scale renovation, repair, and demolition projects. His unwavering dedication to each project has fostered enduring relationships with clients.

Areas of expertise include:
• Survey, Investigation and Contract Specifications for Asbestos, Lead-based Paint, Mold, and other contaminants.
• Review Abatement Contractor submitted Plans and Cost
Estimates for Abatement Work.
• Abatement Monitoring during Construction

Mr. Moreno holds a Bachelor of Architecture from the University of Miami. He is a graduate alumnus of the Goldman Sachs 10,000 Small Business National Program and is an active board member of the Southern California Indoor Air Quality Association (IAQA).

ROLE FOR THIS PROJECT

Mr. Moreno will be the primary contact for this contract. He will provide management, technical and administrative support and review of all services proposed and performed for this contract.

City of Santa Clarita Bainbridge Environmental Consultants, Inc.

RFP CIP-24-25-F0006 Former Senior Center Building Assessment October 8, 2024 For Fremer Architects
14251 Firestone Blvd., Suite 140, La Mirada, CA 90638 • Tel (213) 921-4884 • Fax (714) 247-0025

GAGE

THOMPSON

DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS |
SR. PROJECT MANAGER

CERTIFICATIONS
• State of California Certified Asbestos
Consultant No. 92-6730
• State of California Department of
Public Health Lead Related
Inspector/Assessor No. LRC-00002718
• State of California Department of
Public Health Lead Related Project
Monitor No. LRC-00011294
• Council-certified Microbial Consultant
(CMC) No. 2306028
• NIOSH 582 Certified Microscopist
• OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER No. 115309
• Bachelor of Science in Criminal
Justice Administration – University of
Phoenix 2020

EXPERIENCE:
• ECC / NAVFAC
• L.A. County Dept. of Public Works
• L.A. County Internal Services Division
(ISD)
• University of California, L.A. (UCLA)
• Cal State L.A.
• U.S. General Service Administration
GSA
• U.S. Department of Interior
• California Highway Patrol (CHP)
• Long Beach Unified School District
• Los Angeles Unified School District
• Fullerton Joint Union High School
District
• San Bernardino City Unified School
District
• Irvine Unified School District
• Garden Grove Unified School District

EXPERIENCE

Mr. Thompson is a California Certified Asbestos Consultant and a Lead Related Construction Inspector/Assessor and Project Monitor. He is NIOSH 582 Certified, a Council -certified Microbial Consultant and holds a 40 -Hr HAZWOPER Certificate. He has been with Bainbridge Environmental Consultants for eight (8) years. During his time at Bainbridge, Mr. Thompson has demonstrated ability in leadership and discipline skills to carry out complex projects. Mr. Thompson has performed and overseen numerous surveys as we ll as monitoring projects related to asbestos, lead -based paint, mold and other hazardous materials.

Areas of expertise include:
• Survey, Investigation and Contract Specifications for Asbestos, Lead-based Paint, Mold, and other contaminants.
• Review Abatement Contractor submitted Plans and Cost
Estimates for Abatement Work.
• Abatement Monitoring during Construction

Mr. Thompson holds a degree in Bachelor of Science in Criminal Justice Administration from the University of Phoenix. He is a former United States Marine Sergeant (Rank E -5) and MOS: MILITARY POLICE (5811).

ROLE FOR THIS PROJECT

Mr. Thompson will be the Sr. Project Manager for this project. He will supervise field personnel, oversees project timelines, keep schedules, attend meetings, and ensure projects are performed in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and local regulations.

City of Santa Clarita Bainbridge Environmental Consultants, Inc.

RFP CIP-24-25-F0006 Former Senior Center Building Assessment October 8, 2024 For Fremer Architects
14251 Firestone Blvd., Suite 140, La Mirada, CA 90638 • Tel (213) 921-4884 • Fax (714) 247-0025

Henry Moreno Certifications

City of Santa Clarita Bainbridge Environmental Consultants, Inc.

RFP CIP-24-25-F0006 Former Senior Center Building Assessment October 8, 2024 For Fremer Architects
14251 Firestone Blvd., Suite 140, La Mirada, CA 90638 • Tel (213) 921-4884 • Fax (714) 247-0025

Gage Thompson Certifications

City of Santa Clarita Bainbridge Environmental Consultants, Inc.

RFP CIP-24-25-F0006 Former Senior Center Building Assessment October 8, 2024 For Fremer Architects
14251 Firestone Blvd., Suite 140, La Mirada, CA 90638 • Tel (213) 921-4884 • Fax (714) 247-0025

Anthony Norelli Certifications

Renewal certificate is in the mail.

City of Santa Clarita Bainbridge Environmental Consultants, Inc.

RFP CIP-24-25-F0006 Former Senior Center Building Assessment October 8, 2024 For Fremer Architects
14251 Firestone Blvd., Suite 140, La Mirada, CA 90638 • Tel (213) 921-4884 • Fax (714) 247-0025

City of Santa Clarita Bainbridge Environmental Consultants, Inc.

RFP CIP-24-25-F0006 Former Senior Center Building Assessment October 8, 2024 For Fremer Architects
14251 Firestone Blvd., Suite 140, La Mirada, CA 90638 • Tel (213) 921-4884 • Fax (714) 247-0025

JACQUELINE CHAN
President | Cost Estimator

Founded in 2014, KPJ consulting is MBE/WBE /SBE certified. Jacqueline, the President of KPJ Consulting, has more than 21 years of experience in the construction industry. She has worked on a variety of project types, including historical buildings, higher education, government, hospitals, laboratories, K -12 schools, hospitality, residential, zoological and theme parks with budgets ranging in value from less than $1 million to more than $200 million.

In her role as a Senior Cost Manager, Jacqueline is especially skilled providing accurate budgets at the early programming and conceptual phases of a project when that accuracy is critical to a project’s ultimate success. She achieves that through early advice during design phase and create functional solutions to meet budget expectations.

Cities/Counties Project Experience
City of Baldwin Park, Zocalo Civic Plaza, Baldwin Park, CA

City of Burbank, Starlight Bowl, Amphitheatre Transformation, Burbank, CA

City of Claremont, the Claremont Museum of Art At The Depot, Claremont, CA

City of El Segundo, Recreational Pool Study, El Segundo, CA

City of Los Angeles, Hollywood Recreation Center, Los Angeles, CA

City of Los Angeles, Algin Sutton Pool Replacement, Los Angeles, CA

City of Los Angeles, LA/G WRP Personnel Buildings, Los Angeles, CA

City of Los Angeles, Civil and Human Rights Department Tenant Improvement, Los Angeles, CA

City of Los Angeles, Madrid Theatre Renovation, Los Angeles, CA

City of Los Angeles, Aetna Bridge Home Program, Los Angeles, CA

City of Los Angeles, Washington Irving Library Rehabilitation , Los Angeles, CA

City of Long Beach, Center for Inclusive Business & Workforce Development, Long Beach, CA

City of Santa Ana, Giant River Otter and Howler Exhibits Santa Ana Zoo at Prentice Park, Santa Ana, CA

City of San Clemente, Ole Hanson Beach Club & Pool Rehabilitation, San Clemente, CA

City of Santa Fe Springs, Aquatic Center, Santa Fe Springs, CA

City of Santa Monica, Fire Station 5 Dormitory Tenant Improvements, Santa Monica, CA

City of Whittier, Whittier City Hall East Wing Assessment, Whittier, CA

City of West Hollywood, Log Cabin Refurbishment & Expansion, West Hollywood, CA

Position in Firm
President

Role on Project
Senior Cost Estimator

Length of Association/Total
Years in Field
8 years / 22 years

Level of Education
Master of Business Administration,
Royal Melbourne Institute of
Technology University
Grenoble School of Management,
Innovation Management
UCLA Extension, Award in General
Business Studies
Bachelor of Science, Construction
Quantity Surveying, Royal
Melbourne Institute of Technology
University

Professional Certifications/
Licenses/Registrations
NA

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006

Section F . Forms

NOTICE TO PROPOSERS REGARDING CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS

PROPOSAL # CIP‐24‐25‐F0006
Former Senior Center Building Assessment
City Project No. F0006
City of Santa Clarita, California

1. SUMMARY OF CONTRACTUAL REQUIRMENTS
a. A contract is required for any service performed on behalf of the City of Santa Clarita (City).

b. By submitting a proposal, you have reviewed the sample contract documents contained within this request for proposals and agree to be bound by the requirements set forth.

c. Questions and requests for modification of these terms must be negotiated and approved prior to proposal submission and are at the full discretion of the City.

2. SUMMARY OF INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
a. These are the Indemnity and Insurance Requirements for Contractors providing services or supplies to City of Santa Clarita (City). By agreeing to perform the work or submitting a proposal, you verify that you comply  with  and  agree  to  be  bound  by  these  requirements.  If  any  additional  Contract  documents  are executed, the actual Indemnity language and Insurance Requirements may include additional provisions as deemed appropriate by City’s Purchasing Agent.

b. You  should  check  with  your  Insurance  advisors  to  verify  compliance  and  determine  if  additional coverage or limits may be needed to adequately insure your obligations under this agreement. These are the  minimum  required  and  do  not  in  any  way  represent  or  imply  that  such  coverage  is  sufficient  to adequately cover the Contractor’s liability under this agreement. The full coverage and limits afforded under Contractor’s policies of Insurance shall be available to Buyer and these Insurance Requirements shall not in any way act to reduce coverage that is broader or includes higher limits than those required.

The Insurance obligations under this agreement shall be: 1—all  the Insurance coverage and limits carried by or available to the Contractor; or 2—the  minimum Insurance requirements shown in this agreement, whichever  is  greater.  Any  insurance  proceeds  in  excess  of  the  specified  minimum  limits  and  coverage required, which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to City.

c. Contractor shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements  to  City  before  work  begins.  City  reserves  the  right  to  require  full‐certified  copies  of  all Insurance coverage and endorsements.

3. INDEMNIFICATION
a. To  the  fullest  extent  permitted  by  law,  CONSULTANT  shall  defend  (with  legal  counsel  reasonably acceptable  to  CITY),  indemnify  and  hold  harmless  CITY  and  its  officers,  agents,  departments,  officials, representatives and employees (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all claims, loss, cost, damage,  injury  (including,  without  limitation,  economic  harm,  injury  to  or  death  of  an  employee  of

CONSULTANT or its subconsultants), expense and liability of every kind, nature and description that arise from  or  relate  to  (including,  without  limitation,  incidental  and  consequential  damages,  court  costs, attorneys’  fees,  litigation  expenses  and  fees  of  expert  consultants  or  expert  witnesses  incurred  in connection therewith and costs of investigation) that arise from or relate to, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, from:  (1) CONSULTANT’s performance of Services under this Agreement, or any part thereof; (2)  any  negligent  act  or  omission  of  CONSULTANT,  any  subconsultant,  anyone  directly  or  indirectly employed by them, or anyone that they control; (3) any actual or alleged infringement of the patent rights, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, service mark or any other intellectual or proprietary right of  any  person  or  persons  in  consequence  of  the  use  by  CITY,  or  any  other  Indemnitee,  of  articles  or Services  to  be  supplied  in  the  performance  of  this  Agreement;  or  (4)  any  breach  of  this  Agreement (collectively “Liabilities”).  Such obligations to defend, hold harmless and indemnify any Indemnitee shall not apply to the extent such Liabilities are caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of such Indemnitee,  but shall apply to all other Liabilities.   The foregoing shall be subject to the limitations of California Civil Code section 2782.8 as to any design professional services performed by CONSULTANT and in particular the limitation on CONSULTANT’s duty to defend whereby such duty only arises for claims relating to the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT  as well as the limitation on the  cost  to  defend  whereby  CONSULTANT  will  only  bear  such  cost  in  proportion  to  CONSULTANT’s proportionate percentage of fault (except as otherwise provided in section 2782.8).

b. The  foregoing  indemnification  provisions  will  not  reduce  or  affect  other  rights  or  obligations  which would otherwise exist in favor of the CITY and other Indemnitees.

c. CONSULTANT  shall  place  in  its  subconsulting  agreements  and  cause  its  subconsultants  to  agree  to indemnities  and  insurance  obligations  in  favor  of  CITY  and  other  Indemnitees  in  the  exact  form  and substance of those contained in this Agreement.

4. INSURANCE
a. Before  commencing  performance  under  this  Agreement,  and  at  all  other  times  this  Agreement  is effective, CONSULTANT will procure and maintain the following types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum, with the limits set forth below:

Type of Insurance     Limits
Commercial general liability:   $1,000,000
Professional liability     $1,000,000
Business automobile liability   $1,000,000
Workers compensation     Statutory requirement

b. Commercial general liability insurance will meet or exceed the requirements of ISO‐CGL Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.  The amount of insurance set forth above will be a combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage for the policy coverage.   Automobile coverage will be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01 06 92, including symbol 1 (Any Auto).  Liability policies will be endorsed to name CITY, its officials, and employees as “additional insureds” under said insurance  coverage  and  to  state  that  such  insurance  will  be  deemed  “primary”  such  that  any  other insurance that may be carried by CITY will be excess thereto.  Such endorsement must be reflected on ISO

DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS/SUBCONSULTANTS

PROPOSAL # CIP‐24‐25‐F0006
Former Senior Center Building Assessment
City Project No. F0006
City of Santa Clarita, California

Listed below are the names and locations of the places of business of each subcontractor, supplier, and vendor who will perform work or labor or render service in excess of ½ of 1 percent, or $10,000 (whichever is greater) of the prime contractor's total bid. If no Subcontractors will be used fill out the form with NA.   Please add additional sheets if needed.

Subcontractor

DIR Registration No.  Dollar Value of Work

Location and Place of Business

Bid Schedule Item No’s:  Description of Work
License No.

Exp. Date:       /       /  Phone (     )
Subcontractor

DIR Registration No.  Dollar Value of Work

Location and Place of Business

Bid Schedule Item No’s:

Description of Work
License No.

Exp. Date:       /       /  Phone (     )
Subcontractor

DIR Registration No.  Dollar Value of Work

Location and Place of Business

Bid Schedule Item No’s:  Description of Work
License No.

Exp. Date:       /       /  Phone (     )

NOTE:  A contractor or subcontractor shall not be qualified to propose on, be listed in a proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in this chapter, unless currently registered and  qualified  to  perform  public  work  pursuant  to  Section  1725.5  of  the  Labor  Code.  It  is  not  a  violation  of  this  section  for  an  unregistered contractor to submit a proposal that is authorized by Section 7029.1 of the Business and Professions Code or by Section 10164 or 20103.5 of the Public Contract Code, provided the contractor is registered to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 of the Labor Code at the time the contract is awarded.

Grossman & Speer Associates, Inc.

PW-LR-1000779841
$5,800
529 Hahn Avenue, Suite 200, Glendale, CA 91203
Structural Engineering Services
Derrick Masulis - S 6228
03/31/26
(818) 507-1020
ICI Engineers, Inc.

PW-LR-1000366242
$23,666.90
4000 Valley Blvd. Ste. 105, Walnut, CA 91789
Provide mechanical and plumbing assessment report to provide recommendations on future capital repair and replacement costs.
00127697
09/30/25
(909) 444-1800
Psomas
PW-LR-100010904
$36,300
27200 Tourney Road, Suite 120, Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Engineering services
N/A
N/A
(661) 705-4412

DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS/SUBCONSULTANTS

PROPOSAL # CIP‐24‐25‐F0006
Former Senior Center Building Assessment
City Project No. F0006
City of Santa Clarita, California

Listed below are the names and locations of the places of business of each subcontractor, supplier, and vendor who will perform work or labor or render service in excess of ½ of 1 percent, or $10,000 (whichever is greater) of the prime contractor's total bid. If no Subcontractors will be used fill out the form with NA.   Please add additional sheets if needed.

Subcontractor

DIR Registration No.  Dollar Value of Work

Location and Place of Business

Bid Schedule Item No’s:  Description of Work
License No.

Exp. Date:       /       /  Phone (     )
Subcontractor

DIR Registration No.  Dollar Value of Work

Location and Place of Business

Bid Schedule Item No’s:

Description of Work
License No.

Exp. Date:       /       /  Phone (     )
Subcontractor

DIR Registration No.  Dollar Value of Work

Location and Place of Business

Bid Schedule Item No’s:  Description of Work
License No.

Exp. Date:       /       /  Phone (     )

NOTE:  A contractor or subcontractor shall not be qualified to propose on, be listed in a proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in this chapter, unless currently registered and  qualified  to  perform  public  work  pursuant  to  Section  1725.5  of  the  Labor  Code.  It  is  not  a  violation  of  this  section  for  an  unregistered contractor to submit a proposal that is authorized by Section 7029.1 of the Business and Professions Code or by Section 10164 or 20103.5 of the Public Contract Code, provided the contractor is registered to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 of the Labor Code at the time the contract is awarded.

Bainbridge Environmental
Consultants, Inc.

PW-LR-100011422
$11,198
14251 Firestone Blvd., Suite 140, La Mirada, CA 90638
Asbestos, Lead-based Paint, and Mold Testing
CAC #92-0618/03-3494
Lead #LRC-00000118
12/12/24
06/19/25
(213) 921-4884 or (714) 247-0024
RES Associates Consultants, Inc.
$5,500
21821 Denise Lane, Santa Clarita, CA 91390
Provide electrical assessment report to provide recommendations on future capital repair and replacement costs.

E 17229
06/30/26
(661) 373-0584
Webb Foodservice Design
PW-LR-100058597
$7,000
1530 S Lewis St, Anaheim, CA 92805
Kitchen assessment
N/A
N/A
(714) 244-5690
$6,000

DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS/SUBCONSULTANTS

PROPOSAL # CIP‐24‐25‐F0006
Former Senior Center Building Assessment
City Project No. F0006
City of Santa Clarita, California

Listed below are the names and locations of the places of business of each subcontractor, supplier, and vendor who will perform work or labor or render service in excess of ½ of 1 percent, or $10,000 (whichever is greater) of the prime contractor's total bid. If no Subcontractors will be used fill out the form with NA.   Please add additional sheets if needed.

Subcontractor

DIR Registration No.  Dollar Value of Work

Location and Place of Business

Bid Schedule Item No’s:  Description of Work
License No.

Exp. Date:       /       /  Phone (     )
Subcontractor

DIR Registration No.  Dollar Value of Work

Location and Place of Business

Bid Schedule Item No’s:

Description of Work
License No.

Exp. Date:       /       /  Phone (     )
Subcontractor

DIR Registration No.  Dollar Value of Work

Location and Place of Business

Bid Schedule Item No’s:  Description of Work
License No.

Exp. Date:       /       /  Phone (     )

NOTE:  A contractor or subcontractor shall not be qualified to propose on, be listed in a proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in this chapter, unless currently registered and  qualified  to  perform  public  work  pursuant  to  Section  1725.5  of  the  Labor  Code.  It  is  not  a  violation  of  this  section  for  an  unregistered contractor to submit a proposal that is authorized by Section 7029.1 of the Business and Professions Code or by Section 10164 or 20103.5 of the Public Contract Code, provided the contractor is registered to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 of the Labor Code at the time the contract is awarded.

Wilson Davis Associates
PW-LR-1000779841
$5,880
2825 Litchfield Dr., Riverside, CA 92503
Landscape assessment services
3353
07/31/25
(951) 353-2436
KPJ Consulting
PW-LR-1000366242
$8,500
3461 Rosewood Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90066
Cost estimating services
00127697
09/30/25
(213) 800-1568

REFERENCES

PROPOSAL # CIP‐24‐25‐F0006
Former Senior Center Building Assessment
City Project No. F0006
City of Santa Clarita, California

The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three public agencies for which proposer has performed work of a similar scope and size within the past 3 years. If the instructions on this form conflict with the references requested in the scope of work, the scope of work shall govern. Complete this form out accordingly. Fill out this form completely and upload it with your proposal.

1.  __________________________________________________________________________________ Name and Address of Owner / Agency

__________________________________________________________________________________

Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project

__________________________________________________________________________________ Contract Amount  Type of Work  Date Completed

2.  __________________________________________________________________________________ Name and Address of Owner / Agency

__________________________________________________________________________________ Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project

__________________________________________________________________________________ Contract Amount  Type of Work  Date Completed

3.  __________________________________________________________________________________ Name and Address of Owner / Agency

__________________________________________________________________________________ Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project

__________________________________________________________________________________ Contract Amount  Type of Work  Date Completed

The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all brokers and sureties from whom Proposer intends to procure insurance bonds:
_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

County of Los Angeles, Internal Services Department (ISD) 1100 N Eastern Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90063
$110,000
Bahram Solhjou (310) 598-8454
Andre Attai (213) 547-3725
Alioune Dioum (949) 648-0456
Bioscience LA (formerly Culver City Courthouse
MEP & ADA Building Assessment
10/14/2019
$440,000
Camp David Gonzales
Campus Buildings & Site Assessment
1/15/2023
$110,000
LA County Health Services Building
Water Intrusion, MEP & ADA Assessment
7/17/2023
County of Los Angeles, Internal Services Department (ISD) 1100 N Eastern Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90063
County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works (DPW) 900 S. Fremont Ave., Alhambra, CA 91803

Hal Fremer, AIA
N/A
N/A
N/A

Addendum No. 1
September 17, 2024
PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006
Addendum No. 1
PROPOSAL # CIP-24-25-F0006
Former Senior Center Building Assessment
City of Santa Clarita, California
This addendum must be acknowledged via BidNet and should be included with the proposal response.

There was a non-mandatory, pre-proposal meeting on September 17, 2024 beginning at 10:00 AM (PT).

The meeting was located at 22900 Market Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91355.

Attending Staff:
• Michele Arima – Buyer, Administrative Services
• Alan Stump – Senior Engineer, Public Works
• Cassidy Skelton – Facilities Administrator, Neighborhood Services • Amber Rodriguez - Senior Management Analyst, Neighborhood Services • Patricia Lacsamana – PTS Office Clerk, Administrative Services Attending Vendors:
• Dan Puengprechawat, Fremer Architects
• Joni Ablay, Fremer Architects
The following questions were asked and answered:

Q1) Will you be keeping the building the same as it is now? A1) There is a possibility that it will be a Cultural Center but for now, we will be keeping it the same as it is.

Q2) Will another department be taking over the parking in the rear? A2) We may be using that for a maintenance easement.

Q3) Is there a retaining wall at the rear of the building? A3) Yes
Q4) Do you want us to survey the drainage on the hillside behind the building? A4) We would like you to analyze the drainage around the building and give us your assessment.

Q5) Is there any water damage?
A5) Yes, in the room at the back and on the outside of that room (Logistics room). We are looking for recommendations to fix water damages and drainage issues.

Q6) Is the building 10,000 square feet?
A6) Approximately 11,400 square feet.

City of Santa Clarita Pre-Bid Meeting Sign-In Sheet
Pre-Bid Meeting September 17, 2024 at 10:00 AM (PT)
BID/RFP #CIP-24-25-F0006
Former Senior Center Assessment Report
Bid Closing: October 15, 2024 BEFORE 11:00 AM (PT)
Questions Due by October 1, 2024 BEFORE 11:00 AM (PT)
I hereb y waive, release , and hold harmless from any liability or claims for damage s for personal injur y, including negligence, as well as from claim s for property damage which may arise in connection with the above-named activit y, again st the supervi sors, the City of Santa Clarita , and its elected and appointed officials, agents, and employees. My signature below indicates that I have read, understand, and agree to all of the above .

Company First & Last Name
Must Print Clearl
Signature Contact Information
Or Business Card Prov·ded (write yes)
I{ I I ,, Jo;r1 A
Fremer A rchitect s
arc h itecture I interiors I planni n g
Company First & Last Name Signature Contact Information /Must Print Clearlv\ Or Business Card Provided (write yes)

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1
CON-6
Cou ncil Approval Date:________
Agenda Item: ________
Contract Amount:________

REVISED SAMPLE CONTRACT

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT BETWEEN
T

HE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA AND
FOR
Th
is AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, a municipal corporation and general law city (“CITY”) and _______________________________________, a ________________________________________________________ (“CONSULTANT”), and is dated ________________________.

1. CONSIDERATION.

A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the Services listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, below; and
B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement; and
C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a sum not to exceed ($ ) for CONSULTANT’s Services. CITY may modify this amount as set forth below.

Unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement, CITY will pay this sum as specified in the attached Exhibit(s) “ ” which is/are incorporated by reference.

2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.

A. CONSULTANT will perform Services listed in the attached Exhibit(s) “ ” which is/are incorporated by reference.

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

B. CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space and facilities, and all tests, testing and analyses, calculation, and all other means whatsoever, except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, necessary or proper to perform and com plete the Services and provide the professional Services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement.

3. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.

A. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and cap acity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY . CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public CITY.

B. CONSULTANT will perform its Services in a skillful manner, comply fully with all City established criteria, and with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, and professional standards.

C. CONSULTANT agrees to comply with all applicable federal and state employment laws regulations and rules including those that relate to minimum hours and wages, occupational health and safety, workers compensation insurance and state, county and local orders.

D. CONSULTANT will staff this Agreement with personnel qualified to adequately and professionally perform the Services.

E. CONSULTANT will not subcontract any portion of these Services without the CITY’s prior written approval.

F. CITY’s approval of any payment, or conducting of any inspection, reviews, approvals, or oral statements, or any governmental entity’s certification, will in no way limit the CONSULTANT ’s obligations under this Agreement or CONSULTANT’s complete responsibility for all Services hereunder.

4. PAYMENTS.

A. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Ag reement and as provided in attached Exhibit(s) “ ” , CONSULTANT must submit a detailed invoice to CITY which lists the hours worked and hourly rates for each personnel category and reimbursable costs (all as set forth in Exhibit(s) “ ” ) the tasks performed, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period, the cumulative percentage completed for each task, the total cost of that Services during

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

the preceding billing month and a cumulative cash flow curve show ing projected and actual expenditures versus time to date.

B. CITY may withhold all or a portion of payment otherwise due in the event that Services are either improperly or not performed.

5. PROJECT COORDINATION AND SUPERVISION.

A. CONSULTANT will assign as CONSULTANT’s Project Manager and will be responsible for job performance, negotiations, contractual matters, and coordination with CITY’s Project Manager.

CONSULTANT may change its Project Manager only with CITY consent.

B. CITY will assign as CITY’s Project Manager, will be personally in charge of and personally supervise or perform the technical execution of the project on a day-to-day basis on behalf of CITY, and will maintain direct communication with CO NSULTANT’s Project Manager. CITY may change its Project Manager at any time with notice to CONSULTANT.

6. NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments due and payable to CONSULTANT for current Services are within the current budget and within an available, unexhausted and unencumbered appropriation of the CITY. In the event the CITY has not appropriated sufficient funds for payment of CONSULTANT Services beyond the current fiscal year, this Agreement will cover only those costs incurred up to the conclusion of the current fiscal year.

7. FAMILIARITY WITH SERVICES AND SITE.

A. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has:
i. Carefully investigated and considered the scope of Services to be performed; and
ii. Carefully considered how the Services should be performed; and iii. Understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement.

B. If the Services under this Agreement are to be performed upon any site, or otherwise require CONSULTANT to access a site, by executing this Agreement CONSULTANT represents that it has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, before commencing the Services under this Agreement.

8. TERM.

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

A. The term of this Agreement will be from ________ _ to _________ .

Unless otherwise determined by written amendment between the parties, this Agreement will terminate in the following instances:
i. Completion of the Services specified in Exhibit(s) “ ”, or ii. Termination pursuant to Section 17 TERMINATION.

B. Except as otherwise separately and expressly provided by the CITY in writing, the provisions of this Agreement shall survive any expiration, breach, or termination of this Agreement, and any completion of the Services.

9. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. CONSULTANT will not perform any Services under this Agreement until:

A. CONSULTANT furnishes proof of insurance as required under Section 2 4 INSURANCE; and
B. CITY gives CONSULTANT a written notice to proceed.

Should CONSULTANT begin Services on any phase in advance of receiving written authorization to proceed, any such professional Services are at CONSULTANT’s own risk.

10. SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE AND EXTENSIONS.

A. Should the progress of the Services under this Agreement at any time fall behind schedule for any rea son other than excusable delays CONSULTANT shall apply such additional manpower and resources as necessary to bring progress of the Services under this Agreement back on schedule and consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

B. Should CONSULTANT be delayed by causes beyond CONSULTANT ’s control, CITY may grant a time extension for the completion of the contracted Services. If delay occurs, CONSULTANT must notify the CITY’s designated representative within forty-eight hours (48 hours), in writing, of the cause and the extent of the delay and how such delay interferes with the Agreement ’s schedule. The CITY will extend the completion time , when appropriate, for the completion of the contracted Services.

11. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the Services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract ti me will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the Services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties.

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

12. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.

A. The CITY may request CONSULTANT to provide Services in addition to Scope of Services, called “Additional Services”. Additional Services that incur additional costs (contingency) of up to 15% of the total contract amount must be aut horized by CITY by change order or other documented means. Costs beyond this amount must first be approved by CITY in accordance with applicable thresholds and procedures. Additional Services must be authorized by CITY in writing prior to performance. CONSULTANT shall be compensated for Additional Services as set forth in Exhibit(s) “ ” or as specified in the written authorization.

B. If CONSULTANT believes Additional Services are needed to complete the Scope of Services, CONSULTANT will provide the CITY with written notification that contains a specific description of the proposed additional Services, reasons for such additional Servic es, and a detailed proposal regarding cost. CITY is under no obligation to approve any increase in the agreed-upon costs for the performance of this Agreement.

13. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT, at its sole expense, will obtain and maintain during the t erm of this Agreement, all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement.

14. SITE INSPECTION; DISCOVERY OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OR LATENT CONDITIONS. The discovery, presence, handling or removal of hazardous substances is outside of CONSULTANT’s expertise, unless otherwise specified in Exhibit(s) “ ” , and is not included in the scope of Services. Should CONSULTANT discover any hazardous material, or latent or unknown conditions that may materially affect the performance of the Services, CONSULTANT will immediately inform CITY of such fact and will not proceed except at CONSULTANT’s own risk until written instructions are received from CITY.

15. PREVAILING WAGES. CONSULTANT shall comply with the California Prevailing Wage Law to the extent it applies to work performed under this Agreement. If applicable, CONSULTANT shall pay prevailing wages to its employees and shall comply with the additional provisions set forth below:

A. CONSULTANT shall pay prevailing wages to its employees on any agreement when required by applicable law. Copies of the general prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the Agreement, as determined by the Director of the State of California Department of Industrial Relations, are on file at the County’s Capital Projects Office and may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations website http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/DPreWageDetermination.htm. CONSULTANT shall comply with the 8-hours per day/40 hours per week/overtime/working hours restrictions for all employees, pursuant to the California Labor Code. CONSULTANT and all subconsultants shall keep and maintain accurate employee payroll records for Work performed under the Agreement. The payroll records shall be certified and submitted as required by law, including Labor Code

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

Sections 1771.4 (if applicable) and 1776, including to the Labor Commissioner no less frequently than monthly. CONSULTANT shall comply fully with Labor Code Section 1777.5 in the hiring of apprentices for work relating to the Agreement.

B. CONSULTANT acknowledges and agrees that it will comply with AB 1768 (effective January 1, 2020), which amended and expanded the definition of “construction” for which prevailing wages must be paid to include “ work performed during the design, site assessment, feasibility study, and other pre - construction phases of construction…regardless of whether any further construction work is conducted…”
C. CONSULTANT shall forfeit, as a penalty to Owner, the penalty or penalties as provided by the California Labor Code, for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in performing labor in and about the Work provided for in the Agreement for each day, or portion thereof, that such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the said stipulated rates for any work done under the Agreement by him or her or by any Subconsultant under him or her, in violation of Articles 1 and 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 7 of Division II of the California Labor Code. The sums and amounts which shall be forfeited pursuant to this Paragraph and the terms of the California Labor Code shall be withheld and retained from payments due to CONSULTANT the California Labor Code, but no sum shall be so withheld, retained or forfeited except from the final payment without a full investigation by either the State Department of Industrial Relations or by Owner. The Labor Commissioner pursuant to Californ ia Labor Code §1775 shall determine the final amount of forfeiture.

D. CONSULTANT shall insert in every subcontract or other arrangement which CONSULTANT may make for performance of Work or labor on Work provided for in the Agreement provision that Subconsult ant shall pay persons performing labor or rendering service under subcontract or other arrangement not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the Work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work fixed in the California Labor Code.

E. CONSULTANT and Subconsultants must keep accurate payroll records, showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, strai ght time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by him or her in connection with the Work of the Agreement Documents. Each payroll record shall cont ain or be verified by a written declaration as required by Labor Code Section 1776. The payroll records enumerated above must be certified and shall be available for inspection at all reasonable hours at the principal office of CONSULTANT as required by Labor Code Section 1776. This Project is subject to prevailing wage compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

16. WAIVER. CITY’s review or acceptance of, or payment for, Services or product prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement will not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights CITY may have under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising from CONSULTANT ’s performance. A waiver by CITY of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement will not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement, whether of the same or different character.

17. TERMINATION.

A. Termination for Convenience . CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause by written notice to CONSULTANT.
i. CONSULTANT will be entitled to recover its costs expended up to the termination plus reasonable profit thereon to the termination date not to exceed the total costs under Section 1(C), but may recover no other loss, cost, damage, or expense.

B. Termination for Cause. CITY may terminate this Agreement in whole or part for default should CONSULTANT commit a material breach of this Agreement, and such breach has not been cured within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of CITY’s written notice to CONSULTANT demanding such cure. In the event CITY terminates this Agreement for default, CONSULTANT will be liable to CITY for all costs to cure the deficiencies, and all loss, cost, expense, damage, and liability resulting from such breach and termination.

C. Upon receiving a termination notice, CONSULTANT will immediately cease performance under this Agreement unless otherwise provided in the termination notice. Except as otherwise provided in the termination notice, any Services performed by CONSULTANT a fter receiving a termination notice will be performed at CONSULTANT ’S own cost; CITY will not be obligated to compensate CONSULTANT for such Services.

D. Upon a termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT will become CITY’s property and CONSULTANT will deliver any such items in its possession to CITY within thirty (30) days of termination.

E. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms Services similar to those terminated.

18. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement are CITY’s property.

CONSULTANT may retain copies of said documents and materials as desired, but will deliver all original materials to CITY upon CITY ’s written notice. CITY a grees that use of CONSULTANT’s Services for purposes other than identified in this Agreement is at CITY’s own risk.

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

19. PUBLICATION O F DOCUMENTS . Except as necessary for performance under this Agreement, CONSULTANT will not release copies, sketches, or graphs of materials, including graphic art services, prepared pursuant to this Agreement to any other person or public entity without CITY’s prior written approval. All press releases, including graphic display information to be published in newspapers or magazines, will be approved and distributed solely by CITY, unless otherwise provided by written agreement between the parties.

20. INDEMNIFICATION AND LIABILITY.

A. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall defend (with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to CITY), and selected from CONSULTANT’S insurance carriers’ panel counsel, indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers, agents, departments, officials, representatives and employees (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all claims, loss, cost, damage, injury (including, without limitation, economic harm, injury to or death of an employee of CONSULTANT or its subconsultants), expense and liability of every kind, nature and description to the extent that they arise from or relate to (including, without limitation, direct damages, court costs, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation) (1) CONSULTANT’s negligent performance of Services under this Agreement, or any part thereof; (including any additional services authorized by CITY in writing) (2) any negligent act or omission of CONSULTANT, any subconsultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, or anyone that they control; (3) any actual or alleged infringement of the patent rights, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, service mark or any other intellectual or proprietary right of any person or persons in consequence of the use by CITY, or any other Indemnitee, of articles or Services to be supplied in the performance of this Agreement; or (4) any breach of this Agreement (collectively “Liabilities”). Such obligations to defend, hold harmless and indemnify any Indemnitee shall not apply to the extent such Liabilities are caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of such Indemnitee, but shall apply to all other Liabilities. The foregoing shall be subject to the limitations of California Civil Code section 2782.8 as to any design professional services performed by CONSULTANT and in particular the limitation on CONSULTANT’s duty to defend whereby such duty only arises for claims relating to the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT as well as the limitation on the cost to defend whereby CONSULTANT will only bear such cost in proportion to CONSULTANT’s proportionate percentage of fault (except as othe rwise provided in section 2782.8).

B. The foregoing indemnification provisions will not reduce or affect other rights or obligations which would otherwise exist in favor of the CITY and other Indemnitees.

C. CONSULTANT shall place in its subconsulting agreements and cause its subconsultants to agree to indemnities and insurance obligations in favor of CITY

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

and other Indemnitees in the exact form and substance of those contained in this Agreement.

21. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT ’s professional ser vices.

CONSULTANT or any subconsultant’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s written approval are prohibited and will be null and void.

22. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CONSULTANT shall at all times be deemed an independent contractor wholly responsible for the manner in which it performs the Services, and fully liable for the acts and omissions of its employees, sub consultants and agents. Under no circumstances shall this Agreement be construed as creating an employment, agency, joint venture or partnership relationship between CITY and CONSULTANT, and no such relationship shall be implied from performance of this Agreement. Terms in this Agreement referring to direction from CITY shall be construed as providing for direction as to policy and the result of Services only, and not as to means and methods by which such a result is obtained. CONSULTANT shall pay all taxes (including California sales and use taxes) levied upon this Agreement, the transaction, or the Services and/or goods delivered pursuant hereto without additional compensation, regardless of which party has liability for such tax under applicable law, and any deficiency, interest or penalty asserted with respect thereto. CONSULTANT shall pay all other taxes in cluding but not limited to any applicable City business tax, not explicitly assumed in writing by CITY hereunder.

CONSULTANT shall comply with all valid administrative regulations respecting the assumption of liability for the payment of payroll taxes and contributions as above described and to provide any necessary information with respect thereto to proper authorities. CONSULTANT has no authority to bind the CITY.

23. AUDIT OF RECORDS. CONSULTANT will maintain full and accurate records with respect to all Services and matters covered under this Agreement. Those records include, without limitation, correspondence, internal memoranda, calculations, books and accounts, accounting records documenting its services under its Agreement, and invoices, payrolls, records and all other data related to matters covered by this Agreement. CITY and its designees will have free access at all reasonable times to such records, including the right to audit, examine, and make copies, excerpts, and transcripts from such records, and to inspect all program data, documents, proceedings and activities. If CITY receives funds from another governmental entity for the payment in whole or part of the Services, that governmental entity will have all rights the CITY has under this Section. CONSULTANT will retain all records subject to this Section for at least three (3) years after termination or final payment under this Agreement.

24. INSURANCE. [All insurance terms subject to review and approval of City Risk Manager] A. Before commencing performance under this Agreement, and at all other times this Agreement is effective, CONSULTANT will procure and maintain the following types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum, with the limits set forth below:

Type of Insurance Limits
Commercial general liability: $1,000,000/$2,000,000 (aggregate)

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

Professional liability $1,000,000
Business automobile liability $1,000,000
Workers compensation Statutory requirement
B. Commercial general liability insurance will meet or exceed the requirements of ISO-CGL Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. The amount of insurance set forth above will be a combined single limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage for the policy coverage. Automobile coverage will be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01 06 92, including symbol 1 (Any Auto). Liability policies will be endorsed to name CITY, its officials, and employees as “additional insureds” under said insurance coverage and to state that such insurance will be deemed “primary” such that any other insurance that may be carried by CITY will be excess thereto. Such endorsement must be reflected on ISO Form No. CG 20 10 11 85 or 88, or equivalent. Such insurance will be on an “occurrence,” not a “claims made,” basis and will not be cancelable or subject to reduction except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY.

C. Professional liability coverage will be on an “occurrence basis” if such coverage is available, or on a “claims made” basis if not available. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of at least three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect.

D. CONSULTANT will furnish to CITY duly authenticated Certificates of Insurance evidencing maintenance of the insurance required under this Agreement, including endorsements, and such other evidence of insurance or copies of policies as may be reasonably required by CITY from time to time. Insurance must be placed with California-admitted insurers with (other than workers compensation) a current A.M. Best Company Rating of at least “A:VII.” E. Waiver of Subrogation: The insurer(s) agree to waive all rights of subrogation against CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents, volunteers and employees for losses paid under the terms of the workers compensation policy which arise from work performed by CONSULTANT for CITY.

F. Should CONSULTANT, for any reason, fail to obtain and maintain the insurance required by this Agreement, CITY may obtain such coverage at CONSULTANT’s expense and deduct the cost of such insurance from payments due to CONSULTANT under this Agreement or terminate pursuant to contract language. In the alternative, should CONSULTANT fail to meet any of the

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

insurance requirements under the Agreement, City may terminate this Agreement immediately with no penalty.

G. Should CONSULTANT’S insurance required by this Agreement be cancelled at any point prior to expiration of the policy, CONSULTANT must notify City within 24 hours of receipt of notice of cancellation. Furthermore, CONSULTANT must obtain replacement coverage that meets all contractual requirements within 10 days of the prior insurer’s issuance of notice of cancellation. CONSULTANT must ensure that there is no lapse in coverage.

H. The CITY shall be entitled to any coverage in excess of the minimums required herein.

I. Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by Agency shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of Agency before the Agency’s own insurance or self- insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

J. Additional insured status. General liability, automobile liability, and umbrella/excess liability insurance policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that Agency and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies.

25. INCIDENTAL TASKS. CONSULTANT will meet with CITY monthly to provide the status on the Services, which will include a schedule update and a short narrative description of progress during the past month for each major task, a description of the Services remaining and a description of the Services to be done before the next schedule update.

26. DISPUTE RESOLUTION.

A. In the event of any dispute between CONSULTANT and CITY regarding any claim, demand or request by CONSULTANT for time, money, or additional compensation for any reason whatsoever CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, within 21 days of CONSULTANT’ s first knowledge of the dispute, a written description of CONSULTANT’s claim, demand or request that provides a narrative of the pertinent events, the contractual basis of the CONSULTANT’ s position, pricing calculations (if applicable) and attaches supporting documentation. CITY will then review the issue and make a decision thereon. If CONSULTANT shall fail to provide timely notice of any such claim, demand or request, then CONSULTANT shall waive is rights to such claim, demand or request, unless CONSULTANT can demonstrate a manifest lack of prejudice to CITY resulting from such late notice. CONSULTANT shall continue its work throughout the

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

course of any dispute, and CONSULTANT’ s failure to continue work during a dispute shall be a material breach of this Agreement.

B. If the CITY denies CONSULTANT ’s claim, demand, or request in whole or part and CONSULTANT disagrees, and the claim, demand or request exceeds $50,000 then the parties shall, as a precondition to initiating litigation, submit the dispute claim, demand, or request to the Los Angeles JAMS office for non- binding mediation under the appropriate rules. The parties may agree to any other dispute resolution process. Nothing herein will limit CONSULTANT ’s obligation to timely submit to CITY a st atutory Government Code Claim, in accordance with Government Code sections 910 et seq.

27. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows:

If to CONSULTANT:

If to CITY:

City of Santa Clarita
ATTN: Kenneth W. Striplin, City Manager
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300
ATTN: Santa Clarita, CA 91355

Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee three days after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this Section.

28. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONSULTANT will comply with all conflict of interest laws and regulations including, without limitation, CITY’s Conflict of Interest Code (on file in the City Clerk’s Office). It is incumbent upon the CONSULTANT or CONSULTING FIRM to notify the CITY pursuant to Section 27 NOTICES of any staff changes relating to this Agreement.

A. In accomplishing the Scope of Services of this Agreement, all officers, employees and/or agents of CONSULTANT(S), unless as indicated in Subsection (B), will be performing a very limited and closely supervised function, and, therefore, unlikely to have a conflict of interest arise. No disclos ures are required for any officers, employees, and/or agents of CONSULTANT, except as indicated in Subsection (B).
__________________
Initials of Consultant
B. In accomplishing the Scope of Services of this Agreement, CONSULTANT will be performing a specialized or general service for the CITY, and there is substantial likelihood that the CONSULTANT ’s Services product will be presented, either written or orally, for the purpose of influencing a governmental decision . As a

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

result, the following CONSULTANT personnel shall be subject to the Disclosure Category “1” of the CITY’s Conflict of Interest Code:

______________________ ______________________

______________________ ______________________

C. CONSULTANT’S duties and services under this agreement shall not i nclude preparing or assisting the public entity with any portion of the public entity’s preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with the public entity. The public entity entering this agreement shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project.

D. CONSULTANT’s participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. CONSULTANT shall cooperate with the public entity to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by contractor pursuant to this agreement.

29. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT ’s bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT ’s bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulti ng from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability.

30. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES . CONSULTANT’ s subconsultants shall agree to be bound to the terms of the Agreem ent to the extent of their scope of services, including but not limited to, terms regarding indemnity and dispute resolution, and shall agree that CITY is deemed an express third party beneficiaries of their subconsultant agreement. Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall operate to confer such or similar rights or benefits on persons or entities not party to this Agreement.

31. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California . The exclusive venue for any action involving this Agreement will be in Los Angeles County.

32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written.

There is/are ( ) Exhibits (s) to this Agreement. To the extent of a conflict between this Agreement and one of the Exhibits, the terms of the Agree ment shall take precedence. This

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

Agreement will bind and inure to the benefit of the parties to this Agreement and any subsequent successors and assigns.

33. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with le gal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either party.

34. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a cour t of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and, as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect.

35. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein . To the extent of any contingency above the original Agreement amount previously approved by the CITY’s City Council, additional Services may be added to this Agreement by an additional authorization executed by both parties. This Agreement may be other wise modified by written amendment , which generally requires approval of the CITY’s City Council. CITY’s City Manager, or designee, may execute any such authorization or amendment on behalf of CITY.

36. CAPTIONS. The captions of the sections and paragraphs of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and will not affect the interpretation of this Agreement.

37. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

38. DELAY. CONSULTANT shall complete all Services required by this Agreement within the times specified in the Agreement, except where (1 ) an event outside of CONSULTANT’ s reasonable control causes a delay and ( 2) CONSULTANT promptly advises CITY of such delay (such prompt notice to occur no more than 15 days after the first occurrence of the delay). Such events shall be limited to: acts of neglect by CITY or CITY’s agents or by consultants when acting at CITY’s direction; breaches of this Agreement by CITY; Acts of God such as fire and flood; explosion, acts of terrorism, war and embargo; and other similar causes beyond the Parties’ reasonable control. In the event of an excusable delay the City may elect whether to terminate this Agreement or extend the time for performance.

39. FORCE MAJEURE. Except for defaults of subcontractors at any tier, CONSULTANT shall not be liable for any excess costs if the failure to perform the Agreement arises from causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of CONSULTANT, including without limitation failure to reasonably mitigate any adverse impacts (Force Majeure).

Force Majeure events include the following: Acts of God, fires, floods, ea rthquake, other natural disasters, epidemics and pandemics (other than COVID -19 or variants), abnormal weather conditions beyond the parameters otherwise set forth in this Article, nuclear accidents, strikes, lockouts, freight embargos, interruptions in service by a regulated utility, or governmental statutes or regulations enacted or imposed after the fact (together, “force majeure events”).

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

40. PROTECTION OF RESIDENT WORKERS. The CITY actively supports the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) which includes provisions addressing employment eligibility, employment verification, and nondiscrimination. Under the INA, employers may hire only persons who may legally work in the United States (i.e., citizens and nationals of the U.S., and aliens authorized to work in the U.S .). The employer must verify the identity and employment eligibility of anyone to be hired, which includes completing the Employment Eligibility Verification Form (Form I-9), reviewing required proofs of both identify and employment authorization, and retaining the Form I-9 for the required period. Updated form I-9 information is available at www.uscis.gov. The CONSULTANT shall establish appropriate procedures and controls so no Services or products under the Agreement will be performed or manufactured by any worker who is not legally eligible to perform such Services or employment.

41. SAFETY OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY. CONSULTANT shall comply with, and give notices required by applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and lawful orders of public authorities, bearing on safety of persons or property or their protection from damage, injury, or loss, including without limitation the County Order and all other governmental requirements or regulations regarding COVID-19, all as may be amended from time to time.

42. FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CONTRACT AND SIGNATURE. The parties agree that this Agreement may be transmitted and signed by facsimile or electronic mail by either/any or both/all parties , and that such signatures shall have the same force and effect as original signatures, in accordance with California Government Code section

16.5 and Civil Code section 1633.7.

43. STANDARD S UPPLEMENTAL PROVISIONS . Notwithstanding Section 32 ENTIRE AGREEMENT above, the following Standard Supplemental Provision(s), attached to this Agreement, is(are) incorporated herein by this reference and takes precedence over any conflicting provision of this Agreement : [Insert name of any applicable SSP(s), and attach only that SSP(s)—omit remaining SSP(s). Insert “None” if applicable.]___________________. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]

OAK #4884-4099-0727 v1

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this contract on the date set forth below.
.

FOR CONSULTANT: IF CORPORATION:

By: By:

Print Name & Title Print Name & Title

Date: Date:

FOR CITY OF SANTA CLARITA:

KENNETH W. STRIPLIN, CITY MANAGER

By:

City Manager

Date:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

JOSEPH M. MONTES, CITY ATTORNEY

By:

City Attorney

Date:

2120 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 210
Santa Monica, California 90403
T 310 446 4664
F 310 446 4663
www.fremerarchitects.com
Hal Fremer , AIA, Principal-in-Charge
[email protected]
Contact us.

2120 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 210 Santa Monica, CA 90403 O: 310.446.4664 F: 310.446.4663 www.fremerarchitects.com

November 7, 2024 Revision 2

Ms. Michele Arima
Buyer
City of Santa Clarita
23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 300
Santa Clarita, CA 91355

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

Subject: HH Fremer Architects Proposal for Architectural, Structural & Engineering Services for a Limited Assessment Study at the City of Santa Clarita’s Former Senior Center Building at 22900 Market Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91355 (Rev. 2)

Proposal no.: CIP-24-25-F0006
City project no.: F0006
Project Name: Former Senior Center Limited Building Assessment

Dear Ms. Arima:

We are pleased to submit a revised proposal for the Forensic Assessment Services for the Former Senior Center Building at 22900 Market Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91355.

This proposal has been revised as a result of several conversations with the City of Santa Clarita’s representative, Alan Stump. The purpose of the revision is to acknowledge a reduction of the scope of services agreed to with Mr. Stump.

The proposal has been revised and reflects the deletion of Landscape Architecture , Kitchen Consultant and reduction of the Civil Engineering scope of services. In addition, a general reduction of the proposed fee has been reduced.

In addition, HHFA submits this proposal with the understanding that if the City of Santa Clarita chooses to continue with the renovation of the former Senior Center, HHFA will be eligible to submit a proposal for consideration for that phase of the project.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE SUMMARY:

The Former Senior Center Building was designed and constructed in 1963 at the above-mentioned location. It is a single-story wood framed building.

We have been provided with the following documentation from the City of Santa Clarita:

• Current “As Built” Plans dated June 12, 2020, prepared by the City of Santa Clarita for reference only
• Analysis Report prepared by Landscape Architecture & Design Department of Parks and Recreation, dated June 2019
• Existing “as‐built” Activity Rooms Addition to the Main Building, dated March 4, 2007

2120 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 210 Santa Monica, CA 90403 O: 310.446.4664 F: 310.446.4663 www.fremerarchitects.com

Page | 2

• Existing “as‐built” Parking Expansion, Dated March 1986 • Existing “as‐built” Market Street Drain
• Existing “as‐built” Sr. Center Landscape
• Existing “as‐built” Sr. Center Bath Rms Ventilation, Dated January 22, 1998

The proposed scope of services for this Project includes the following:

• Review of all existing as-builts, reports and information provided by the City of Santa Clarita • Review the existing Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Fire Protection and Low Voltage Systems and provide recommendations for upgrades and replacements of analyzed systems. • A full ADA evaluation of the existing conditions including restrooms, plumbing fixture count and requirement, path of travel to the ADA restrooms, approaches and door hardware, ADA parking. • Building envelope evaluation including water intrusion on vertical surfaces, exterior finishes, roof, door and window systems and recommendations for the same will be provided. • Interior building component evaluation including interior finishes of all viewable areas • Site and grounds evaluation and visual survey including site drainage, pavement, parking, curbs, walks, fencing/railing, exterior lighting, retaining walls, signage & exterior amenities and provide recommendations for upgrades and replacements of analyzed systems. If an actual survey deemed necessary by the City, survey to be conducted at additional fee. Fee has been broken out of the assessment fee in the Fee Schedule.
• Review and evaluation of existing structural systems including foundations, structural framing, columns, floors & roofs and provide recommendations for upgrades and replacements of analyzed systems.
• If necessary, interviews and research to be conducted with individuals and public agencies familiar with the property to gather additional information. • Conduct a full environmental survey and investigation to identify presence of asbestos, lead - based paint & mold/water intrusion both interior and exterior and roof of the building and provide recommendations for remediation.

The scope of services described herein include the preparation of an Assessment Report and Cost Study that will set forth the requirements for the upgrading of the subject structures as described above.

DETAILED SCOPE OF ARCHITECT’S SERVICES:

In the section that follows, we have outlined the approach to the scope of work and deliverables associated with this Project:

Phase 1: Project Protocol
• Review methodology, scope and constraints.
• Establish project protocol for decision making, based on client processes & procedures. • Specify logical points for city review of project procedures.

Phase 2: Data Gathering Phase
▪ Review available information provided by the City of Santa Clarita. ▪ Inspect/Observe the buildings and facilities at pre-investigative site visit and compare with existing drawings.

2120 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 210 Santa Monica, CA 90403 O: 310.446.4664 F: 310.446.4663 www.fremerarchitects.com

Page | 3

▪ Perform site and environmental surveys as delineated above and in the RFP. ▪ Analyze conditions of existing mechanical, electrical & plumbing systems. ▪ Identify areas of destructive testing required to complete study. ▪ Compile a list of deficiencies identified.

Phase 3: Assessment Report Preparation
▪ Provide recommendations for a repair and code compliance. ▪ Submit Assessment Report and Cost Study to the City of Santa Clarita for review and comments.
▪ Provide recommended second-generation use of building. ▪ Suggest growth limitations for site.

Assessment Report Presentation
▪ One online meeting to present report findings to the City of Santa Clarita. (Limited to One (1) online Meeting)

FEE PROPOSAL:

For the purposes of this proposal the fee budget is based upon our experience with projects of similar size and scope. Our proposed fee for the scope of services described herein is as follows:

Assessment Study:

Service Package Duration Fee Budget Assessment Study 8 weeks $133,000.00 Survey (if deemed TBD $8,000.00 (T&M)
necessary by the City)
Reimbursable Expenses TBD $2500 (Not to Exceed)

CONSULTANT FEES

The fees for professional consultants necessary for the completion of the work are included in the above fee budget and shall be a part of the Architect’s design team.

Basic Consultants:

1. Civil Engineer & Survey (PSOMAS)

2. Structural Engineer (Grossman & Speer)

3. M & P Engineers (ICI Engineers)

4. Electrical Engineer (RES Associates)

5. Cost Consultant (KPJ Consulting)

6. Environmental Engineer (Bainbridge)

7. Waterproofing Consultant (part of Architect’s scope of services)

ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS:

1. Cost of all professional consultants other than that mentioned above that are required complete this scope of work is not a part of this fee proposal.

2. As Built Drawings of the(E) Building are not a part of this proposal.

3. Destructive testing, patching or repairing is not a part of this proposal.

4. Agency submissions are not a part of this proposal.

5. If destructive testing is required, to be performed and coordinated by the City of Santa Clarita .

2120 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 210 Santa Monica, CA 90403 O: 310.446.4664 F: 310.446.4663 www.fremerarchitects.com

Page | 4

6. Design changes or scope modifications to incorporate Value Engineering proposed by Contractor is not a part of this proposal.

7. Record or As Built drawings or further studies are not a part of this proposal.

8. Reproduction/printing of existing drawings or any report/presentation related materials are not part of this fee proposal and shall be reimbursable. All submissions will be in electronic format.

REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES:

All direct project related expenses, incurred during the performance of basic or additional services, by us or our consultants under this agreement, including but not limited to drawing reproduction & plotting, long distance telephone & faxes, travel & lodging, messenger, postage & overnight delivery service will be invoiced at cost plus fifteen (15%) and are in addition to the compensation for basic services.

Reimbursable expenses will be invoiced monthly as charges are incurred, based upon the following schedule of charges:
▪ Automobile Travel: at prevailing allowable IRS rate ($.67 per mile) ▪ Other travel expenses (hotels, airlines fares, parking fees, etc.): at cost ▪ Large format plots (excludes internal coordination plots): $4.25 per square foot ▪ Digital bond copies, Digital Color (outsourced): at cost + 10% ▪ Small Format color output, in house, 11x17 bond: $4.00 each. ▪ Postage, Couriers, Overnight Shipping: at cost + 15%
▪ Reproduction services: cost + 15%
▪ Owner required reimbursable expenses.

ADDITIONAL SERVICES:

HH Fremer Architects will provide Additional Services as authorized in writing by the City of Santa Clarita and they shall be paid by the City of Santa Clarita as provided for in the “Hourly Fee Schedule.”

Additional Services shall be any other services not otherwise included in this proposal or not customarily furnished in accordance with generally accepted architectural practice.

HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE:

For Basic and Additional Services, the compensation provided for in this proposal is based on hours expended applied to the rate schedule as indicated below -

HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
Principal $300/hr.

Project Architect $280/hr.

Project Manager $250/hr.

Project Designer $185/hr.

2120 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 210 Santa Monica, CA 90403 O: 310.446.4664 F: 310.446.4663 www.fremerarchitects.com

Page | 5

FEE NEGOTIATIONS

Total professional fees shall be based directly upon the final agreed scope of work resulting from the Owner supplied requirements for the Project. Fees may be renegotiated by either party at any time the approved scope or timing of the Project is materially changed.

PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE

ACTIVITY

DURATION

REVIEW
50%
Pre-Investigative Detailed Building
Evaluation & Assessment
Data Gathering, Surveys
Report Preparation

4 weeks

N/A
100%
Report Preparation
Report Delivery
Follow Up Presentation

4 weeks

2 weeks

Qualifications to Preliminary Schedule

1. Schedule for Architect’s deliverables shall not be compressed should the City of Santa Clarita exceed scheduled time for review periods.

2. The amount of time required by the City of Santa Clarita for their review and approval of this Project shall be in addition to the schedule of deliverables noted above.

Forensic Analyst $180/hr.

Senior Technical $175/hr.

Roofing/Waterproofing $150/hr.

CADD / BIM $135/hr.

Intermediate Designer $165/hr.

Intermediate Technical $155/hr.

Technical Support $105/hr.

Administrative / Accounting $ 85/hr

2120 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 210 Santa Monica, CA 90403 O: 310.446.4664 F: 310.446.4663 www.fremerarchitects.com

Page | 6

3. Additional services and changes to project scope shall require time expansion.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

All terms, conditions and fees quoted herein shall be valid for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of this proposal at which time this proposal will become subject to renegotiation.

We look forward to working with you on this exciting Project. If you have any questions or require any further clarifications to this proposal, please contact my office at your earliest convenience.

Should you require additional information regarding this matter please contact our offices at your earliest convenience.

Respectfully,
HH Fremer Architects

Harold H. Fremer, AIA
Principal