Santa Clarita City Council
April 22, 2025

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

PLANNING COMMISSION

REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, March 18, 2025
6:00 PM
City Council Chambers
23920 Valencia Blvd.

Santa Clarita, CA 91355

AMENDED AGENDA
______________________________________________________________________________ In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact thePlanning Division at (661) 255-4330. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II) Any writings or documents distributed to a majority of the members of the Planning Commission regarding any open session item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 120, during normal business hours. These writings or documents will also be available for review at the meeting. ______________________________________________________________________________

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

FLAG SALUTE

COMMISSION SECRETARY ANNOUNCEMENT
APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES – The minutes of the Planning Commission are submitted for approval.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Planning Commission approve the minutes of the February 18, 2025 Regular Meeting.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134) - A request for a new five-story mixed-use building with 78 units and approximately 5,200 square-feet of commercial on the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Planning Commission:

1. Conduct the public hearing;

2. Determine that the project is exempt from additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act as the project was contemplated under the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and will comply with all mitigation measures established by the FEIR;

3. Adopt Resolution P25-03, recommending that the City Council approve Master Case 24-134 (Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012) for the construction of a new five-story mixed-use building and demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A); and

4. Take additional, related action that may be desirable.

2. 2025 MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATES (MASTER 24-112) - Updates to the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, Old Town Newhall Specific Plan; the Lyons Corridor Plan; and the Soledad Canyon Road Corridor Plan for 2025.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Planning Commission:

1. Conduct the public hearing;

2. Determine that the project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the common sense exemption;

3. Adopt Resolution P25-04, recommending the City Council approve Master Case 24-112, consisting of Unified Development Code Amendment 24-001 (UDC24- 001) and Specific Plan Amendment 24-001 (SP24-001); and

4. Take additional, related action that may be desirable.

PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSIONERS' REPORT

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Pursuant to Government Code section 54954.3 members of the public are afforded the opportunity to address the Commission. This time has been set aside for the public to address the Commission on items NOT listed on the agenda. The Commission will not act upon these items at this meeting other than to review and/or provide direction to staff. All speakers must submit a speaker’s card to the Commission Secretary PRIOR to the beginning of this portion of the meeting, and prepare a presentation not to exceed three minutes (with double the time allotted to non-English speakers using a translator).

ADJOURNMENT

CERTIFICATION
On March 14, 2025, I, Patrick Leclair, do hereby certify that I am the duly appointed and qualified Planning Manager for the City of Santa Clarita and that the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall.
_____________________________
Patrick Leclair
Planning Manager
Santa Clarita, California

Agenda Item: 1

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

PLANNING COMMISSION

AGENDA REPORT

PUBLIC HEARINGS
PLANNING MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: March 18, 2025
SUBJECT: NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)
APPLICANT: Serrano Development Group
LOCATION: 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street And 22505 Market Street CASE PLANNER: Emily Rubalcava

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Planning Commission:

1. Conduct the public hearing;

2. Determine that the project is exempt from additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act as the project was contemplated under the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and will comply with all mitigation measures established by the FEIR;

3. Adopt Resolution P25-03, recommending that the City Council approve Master Case 24- 134 (Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24- 005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012) for the construction of a new five-story mixed-use building and demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A); and

4. Take additional, related action that may be desirable.

REQUEST
The applicant, Serrano Development Group, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit (ADJ), Architectural Design Review (ADR), and Development Review (DR) for the redevelopment of the project site into a new five-story mixed1 Packet Pg. 8

use project and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building located at 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 2831-012-022 through -026), within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP).

BACKGROUND
Project Setting
The project site consists of five parcels within the OTNSP area, totaling three-quarters of an acre. It is located on the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, across the street from the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station. There are three existing buildings on-site:

1. Mac’s Pool Supply commercial building – 24316 Main Street (APNs 2831-012-025 and - 026). The existing pool supply business occupied the building in 2016.

2. Horseshoe on Main commercial building – 24300 and 24308 Main Street (APNs 2831- 012-023 and -024). On May 21, 2023, the property was entitled for the construction of a new outdoor food court use, but halted its progress for the proposed project. The property is currently being used seasonally for holiday events. Before this, the property was known as Soundsations, a car stereo installation shop.

3. Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building – 22505 Market Street (APN 2831-012-022). This building is identified on the Historic Preservation list of potentially historic structures located in the OTNSP. The existing building was constructed using repurposed material from the Mayhue building, a former dance hall dating back to the late 1800s. In 1932, the ground floor was occupied as the Courthouse, while the second floor was occupied by the Masonic Lodge. In 1968, the Court relocated to Valencia and the building has been used as offices since then.

Project Submittal
On April 17, 2024, the applicant submitted a One Stop Preliminary Plan Review to the Planning Division for a new five-story mixed-use building on the Mac’s Pool Supply and Horseshoe on Main properties. The review was completed on June 6, 2024.

On June 28, 2024, the applicant submitted an application to develop the project, including 51 units, 3,400 square feet of ground floor commercial space, and two levels of parking, one subterranean and one at street level. In response to the One Stop comments, the application identified the proposed architectural style for the building as Western Victorian, and included architectural elements in line with this style. The project was deemed complete on August 12, 2024.

On November 27, 2024, the applicant revised the project scope, expanding the project site footprint to include the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse property and incorporating additional architectural enhancements in response to comments from City of Santa Clarita (City) staff and the City’s architectural consultant. The revised project included additional units, for a total of 78, and additional commercial floor area, for a total of 5,223 square feet. 1 Packet Pg. 9

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Development Proposal
The applicant is proposing the demolition of the Mac’s Pool Supply, Horseshoe on Main, and Masonic Lodge/Courthouse buildings for the full-block development of a new mixed-use building consisting of 78 apartments and approximately 5,200 square feet of commercial. The proposed building would be five-stories, 52 feet in height, over one subterranean level of parking. Commercial store fronts are located at the ground level facing Main Street, with groundlevel parking behind, within the building footprint. Apartment units are located on the upper levels and oriented around an internal courtyard located on the second floor. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via two new driveways from both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. In addition, one existing driveway on Main Street would be closed, allowing for the addition of three public parking spaces on Main Street.

The project site and surrounding areas are shown in the attached Aerial and Zoning Map.

Entitlement Summary
Implementation of the project will require the approval of the following entitlements:

Conditional Use Permit 24-007
Required to increase the allowable floor area ratio (FAR) above 200 percent of the structure’s first floor footprint for the Stacked Dwelling building type of the OTNSP.

Minor Use Permit 24-015
Required for the delisting and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building with City Council approval; and required for the export of 18,972 cubic yards of dirt.

Adjustment Permit 24-005
Required to reduce the shared residential amenity space requirement up to 20 percent from OTNSP standards, from 13,650 square feet to 10,929 square feet.

Development Review 24-012 and Architectural Design Review 24-017 Required to ensure that the project, site plan, and architecture complies with all of the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC), the General Plan, and OTNSP.

Amenity Areas
Each unit has a balcony to provide private outdoor space. Balconies range in size from 75 square feet to 100 square feet. In addition, the proposal includes 10,929 square feet of shared residential amenity space, providing an outdoor courtyard with pool and spa, a residential clubhouse/lounge, lobby, garden corridor, and a bike room for residents to do bike maintenance. 1 Packet Pg. 10

Architecture
The OTNSP prescribes Craftsman, Main Street Commercial, Mediterranean, Monterey, and Western Victorian as appropriate architectural styles. The proposed project is designed in the Western Victorian architectural style and draws inspiration from both the historic and newer buildings in Old Town Newhall, including the Southern Hotel building and the Old Town Newhall Library. Through the design process, the project was reviewed for compliance by the City’s architectural consultant, and City staff worked with the applicant through multiple iterations to refine key architectural elements. This included emphasizing the building’s corners and enhancing the roofline to diversify the building’s massing. The Western Victorian architectural style is accomplished through features such as cornices with decorative brackets, wood siding on the building’s entrance and corner towers, and awnings along the commercial storefronts. Additionally, the applicant has proposed to incorporate two murals along the North Elevation; the murals would pay homage to the Western character of Old Town Newhall. The proposed architecture would be complementary to the existing surrounding architecture and is consistent with the OTNSP.

Parking
A total of 122 parking stalls for the residential units are provided on-site, within ground floor and subterranean parking levels. Residential guest parking will use public parking stalls, and the applicant will utilize the OTNSP Parking In-Lieu fee program to meet the commercial parking requirement. Changes to California law (AB 2097) limits the City’s ability to impose minimum parking requirements within one-half mile of transit stations unless there is a negative impact on residential and commercial parking within one-half mile of the project site. A parking demand study was prepared by the applicant demonstrating parking will be adequate as proposed in compliance with AB 2097. Additional discussion is provided in the Analysis portion of this report.

Removal of Masonic Lodge/Courthouse
The project proposal includes the demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building. The City Council, in the adoption of the OTNSP and the Historic Preservation Ordinance, designated a list of structures, including this building as historic resources. Section 17.64.090 of the UDC empowers the City Council to approve, approve with modifications and/or conditions, or deny a request for demolition of a historic resource. The applicant has requested an MUP to delist the building as a historic resource and to demolish it. The Planning Commission will hear the request for the MUP, and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council has the ultimate decision-making authority for the MUP to delist and demolish the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse.

To address potential impacts to historic resources, the OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) includes mitigation measures related to the demolition of historic resources.

Mitigation measure (MM) CUL-1 provides a path forward to remove any City Council designated historic structures. The applicant has provided a letter from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, finding that the historical integrity of the building was severely compromised by a remodel in 1968, that no interior features remain from its use as a County Courthouse, and that it would be infeasible to relocate the building to another location. In addition, to fulfill MM1 Packet Pg. 11

CUL-1, the applicant has been conditioned to commemorate the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse by:
(1) recording the building in accordance with Historic Architectural Building Survey, (2) installing a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, (3) placing a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and (4) making a monetary contribution of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts.

GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USES
The project site is located within the OTNSP and has a General Plan designation of Specific Plan. The project site has a zoning designation of AE under the OTNSP, which is the zoning designation applied to the central portions of Old Town Newhall generally aligned with Main Street. This zone contemplates commercial uses, arts and entertainment uses, and mixed-use development with housing. Ground floor uses are intended to accommodate art galleries, theaters, performance venues, specialty retail and restaurants, while upper floors accommodate offices or housing (OTNSP Table 4.2-4). The zone intends to promote a mixed-use walkable neighborhood and activation of Main Street as a lively and engaging public space. The project site is surrounded by commercial uses to the north, west, and south, and the Metrolink station to the east.

Table 1 summarizes the Specific Plan designations, zoning, and land uses for the project site and adjacent properties.

Table 1:

Specific Plan
and Zoning
Designation
Land Use
Project Site OTNSP-AE Proposed Mixed Use Building
North OTNSP-AE Specialty Retail (Earth Baby Boutique)
and KHTS Radio Station
South OTNSP-AE Restaurant (El Trocadero), Indoor
Entertainment (The Main)
West OTNSP-AE Liquor Store (Bonanza Liquor Market)
East OTNSP-N Jan Heidt Metrolink Station
Key: AE = Arts & Entertainment; N = Neighborhood

ANALYSIS
General Plan Compliance
The proposed project would be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, including, without limitation:

Objective LU 2.1: Provide adequate, suitable sites for housing, employment, business, shopping, public facilities, public utility facilities, and community services to meet current needs and the anticipated needs of future growth. 1 Packet Pg. 12

Objective LU 2.3: Increase mixed-use development where appropriate to create more livable neighborhoods, walkable business districts, and to reduce vehicle trips, while ensuring land use compatibility, through mixed-use zoning.

Policy LU 3.1.2: Provide a mix of housing types within neighborhoods that accommodate households with varied income levels.

The development proposal is consistent with the intent and goals of the General Plan. The project would provide a combination of residential and commercial spaces, helping to meet the housing and business needs of both current and future residents. The project would add a mixed-use building in a walkable and transit-friendly area. The development includes a variety of unit mixes, ensuring accessibility for households of different sizes.

OTNSP Compliance
New developments within the OTNSP area must comply with the design standards of the zone and building type. The proposed project is a Stacked Dwelling building type combined with a Commercial building type, which is defined as a vertically stacked structure that accommodates housing above commercial uses. The Stacked Dwelling building type includes thresholds for building massing by establishing a certain allowable FAR for the upper floors of the building.

The total square footage of a building may exceed 200 percent, or an FAR of 2.0, of the structure’s first-floor footprint, with the approval of a CUP. The proposed project would have a FAR of 4.76. The proposed project is consistent with this standard as a CUP has been requested to increase the FAR of the project as allowed by the OTNSP.

The Stacked Dwelling building type has private outdoor space requirements for the residential portion of projects. Projects must provide private residential outdoor space, which is defined as a balcony, yard, or other private space. The private outdoor space requirement is 75 square feet for one-bedroom units, and 100 square feet for two or three-bedroom units. As proposed, each unit provides the required balcony space in compliance with the OTNSP standard for private outdoor space.

In addition, there are requirements for shared residential amenity space, which is defined as shared recreational facilities such as a park, pool, fitness facility, etc. The requirement for shared residential amenity space is 150 square feet for one-bedroom units and 200 square feet for two or three-bedroom units. As proposed, the project would require 13,650 square feet of shared residential amenity space; the applicant is seeking an ADJ to reduce the shared amenity space requirement by 20 percent, and would provide a total of 10,929 square feet of shared residential amenities, including a pool and spa within a central courtyard, clubhouse/lounge, and garden corridor with herb garden.

As discussed in the project description above, the applicant has invoked AB 2097, which prohibits the City from requiring parking minimums on projects within a half mile of transit, unless the project would have a negative impact on the existing parking supply. While the OTNSP development standards would require two parking spaces per residential unit, half a space per unit of guest parking, and one parking space for the first 1,500 square feet of new commercial development, plus one space per every additional 350 square feet, the parking demand study prepared by the applicant demonstrates that sufficient parking would be provided 1 Packet Pg. 13

by the project to avoid a substantially negative impact on existing parking.

Table 2 shows the required parking under the OTNSP, the proposed parking to be provided by the project, and the state baseline per AB 2097.

Table 2:

OTNSP Requirement Proposed State Baseline
Residential 156 spaces 122 on-site spaces 0 spaces
Guest 39 spaces 20 public spaces 10 spaces
Commercial 12 spaces (OTNSP
in-lieu fee) OTNSP in-lieu fee 0 spaces
1 e.g. street or public garage parking
The OTNSP identifies five architectural styles that define the character of Old Town Newhall.

As outlined in the project description above, the project has been reviewed by the City’s architectural consultant and is consistent with the Western Victorian architectural style of the OTNSP. In addition, the project meets all other design standards of the OTNSP for the Stacked Dwelling building type, including requirements for setbacks and height. The height of the project is consistent with existing buildings in Old Town Newhall, such as Newhall Crossings and the Old Town Newhall Library.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The project was contemplated under the OTNSP FEIR. As described, the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. No further action under the California Environmental Quality Act is required.

NOTICING
All notices as required by law were completed. Property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site were notified of the public hearing by mail (106 notices). A public notice was placed in The Signal on February 25, 2025, and a sign was posted on the project site on March 4, 2025.

As of the publishing of this agenda, the Planning Division has received one letter of support in regards to the project (attached).

CONCLUSION
The Newhall Mixed-Use Project is consistent with the provisions outlined in the General Plan, SCMC, and OTNSP. Therefore, City staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution P25-03, recommending that the City Council approve Master Case 24-134 (CUP24- 007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012) for the construction of a new fivestory mixed-use building and demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse 1 Packet Pg. 14

building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A);

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution P25-03
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134)
Exhibit A Attachment #1 (Market Street Striping)
Exhibit A Attachment #2 (Parks Planning Fee Estimate)
Aerial and Zoning Map
Site & Floor Plans
Elevations & Renderings
Notice of Determination
Public Hearing Notice
Letter From Historical Society
Comment Letters
1 Packet Pg. 15

RESOLUTION P25-03

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE MASTER CASE 24-134, CONSISTING OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 24-007, MINOR USE PERMIT 24-015, ADJUSTMENT PERMIT 24-005, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 24-017, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 24-012,

FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW FIVE-STORY MIXED USE BUILDING AND

DEMOLITION AND DELISTING OF THE MASONIC LODGE/COURTHOUSE BUILDING LOCATED AT 24300, 24308, 24316 MAIN STREET AND 22505 MARKET STREET (ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS: 2831-012-022 THROUGH -026), IN THE CITY OF

SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (EXHIBIT A).

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR MASTER CASE 24-134. The Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact:

A. On June 28, 2024, the applicant (Serrano Development Group) initiated Master Case 24-134, consisting of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-007, Minor Use Permit (MUP) 24-015), Adjustment Permit (ADJ) 24-005, Architectural Design Review (ADR) 24-017, and Development Review (DR) 24-012. The properties affected by the initial application were Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 2831-012-023 through -026; B. On November 27, 2024, the application was revised to include an additional property which is APN 2831-012-022;
C. The application was deemed complete on November 27, 2024; D. The project site consists of five parcels totaling three-quarters of an acre. It is located at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, across the street from the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station. The project proposes to demolish three existing buildings on-site: Mac’s Pool Supply (24316 Main Street), Soundsations (24300 and 24308 Main Street), and the City Council designated historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse (22505 Market Street);
E. The project site is located within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP);
F. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structures on-site to construct a new fivestory mixed-use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area and 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and first-floor parking level. The project includes the closure of one driveway on Main Street and would allow for the addition of three public parking spaces on Main Street. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via new driveways from both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requests relief from the

1.a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
requirements of the OTNSP to include a 20-percent reduction from the shared residential amenity space and to increase the allowable floor area ratio (FAR) above 200 percent of the structure’s first floor footprint;
G. In compliance with AB 2097, the applicant is proposing to provide residential and on-street guest parking to avoid a negative impact on commercial and residential parking within onehalf mile of the project site, as demonstrated in the parking demand study on file with the Planning Division. Specifically, the study proposes to provide a 1.56 residential parking ratio on-site instead of the 2.0 ratio required by the OTNSP. The study also proposes a 0.25 per unit ratio for guest parking to be accommodated on-street instead of the required 0.5 per unit ratio. The proposed development is utilizing the OTNSP Parking In-Lieu fee program to meet the commercial parking requirement;
H. The project proposes to demolish a building included on the OTNSP’s Historic Preservation list and designated as historic by the City Council under the Historic Preservation Ordinance.

The OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) includes mitigation measure CUL-1, which governs the demolition of historical structures. The applicant has submitted a letter from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, which states that this structure is no longer historically significant, and would fulfill the requirements of mitigation measure CUL-1 by recording the building in accordance with Historic Architectural Building Survey, installing a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, placing a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and making a monetary contribution of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts;
I. On March 18, 2025, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City of Santa Clarita (City) Planning Commission at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita;
J. At this public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the staff report, staff presentation, applicant’s presentation, and public testimony; and K. This Resolution and its findings are made based upon the entire administrative record including, without limitation, testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at its March 18, 2025, public hearing including, without limitation, the staff report.

SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF MASTER CASE 24-134. Based upon the foregoing facts and findings, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows:

A. The project was contemplated under the OTNSP FEIR and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. In particular, the applicant would fulfill the requirements of mitigation measure CUL-1. As demonstrated by the letter on file from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse has been substantially altered and no further action under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is required. Consequently, a Notice of Determination was prepared for this project in compliance with CEQA;

1.a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
B. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the Planning Commission is based is the Master Case 24-134 project file. This project file is located within the Community Development Department in the custody of the Director of Community Development; and
C. Based upon the findings set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby finds the Notice of Determination for this Project has been prepared in compliance with CEQA.

SECTION 3. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE 24-134. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the Planning Commission determines as follows:

A. That the proposal is consistent with the General Plan; The proposed project would be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, including, without limitation:

The proposed project would be consistent with the following policies of the General Plan:

Objective LU 2.1: Provide adequate, suitable sites for housing, employment, business, shopping, public facilities, public utility facilities, and community services to meet current needs and the anticipated needs of future growth.

Objective LU 2.3: Increase mixed-use development where appropriate to create more livable neighborhoods, walkable business districts, and to reduce vehicle trips, while ensuring land use compatibility, through mixed-use zoning.

Policy LU 3.1.2: Provide a mix of housing types within neighborhoods that accommodate households with varied income levels.

The development proposal is consistent with the intent and goals of the General Plan. The project would provide a combination of residential and commercial spaces, helping to meet the housing and business needs of both current and future residents. The project would add a mixed-use building in a walkable and transit-friendly area. The development includes a variety of unit mixes, ensuring accessibility for households of different sizes.

B. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP);
The proposed project would be consistent with the following findings of the OTNSP:

OTNSP-1: That the proposed use or project is consistent with the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan.

OTNSP-2: That the proposed use or project meets the development requirements for the

1.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
Zone within which it is located including parking, architecture, and ground-floor uses.

A Stacked Dwelling building type is permitted by right in the AE zone of the OTNSP only as part of a vertical mixed-use project with upper floor residential. Any future tenants in the new commercial spaces constructed by the project will be subject to the requirements of OTNSP Table 4.2-1, the permitted use chart for the AE zone. A CUP is requested to increase the allowable FAR above 200 percent of the structure’s first floor footprint for the Stacked Dwelling building type of the OTNSP. An ADJ is requested to reduce the shared residential amenity space requirement up to 20-percent from OTNSP standards. The building is consistent with the Western Victorian architectural style of the OTNSP. The proposed project complies with all other development standards for the AE zone and Stacked Dwelling building type. With the conditions of approval, the project will with Title 16 and 17 of the SCMC and the OTNSP
C. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and
The proposed project is not located on a hazardous site and would not include any hazardous materials. Standard construction materials and methods would be utilized to ensure safety during construction. The applicant will be required to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations, including, without limitation: the California Building Standards Code and Fire Code. Sufficient access for firefighting purposes has been provided and verified by the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (LACFD), and the applicant must comply with all LACFD requirements.

D. The proposal is physically suitable for the site. The factors related to the proposal’s physical suitability for the site shall include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for the proposed use;
The subject site includes existing commercial development and surface parking. The parking demand study for the project demonstrates that sufficient parking is provided for the proposed building. The proposed building complies with the City’s standards for mixed-use development, including compliance with setbacks, building height, drive aisle width, and landscaping.

2. The highways or streets that provide access to the site are of sufficient width and are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such proposal would generate;
The project is accessed via Market Street and Railroad Avenue, and improvements to the roadway will be required for the proposed building. The applicant must comply with all

1.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
City-imposed engineering requirements when constructing any improvements in the right-of-way, such as sewer laterals, parkway tree installation, and ADA paths of travel at the driveways. The project will not have a significant effect on vehicle miles traveled or traffic, and existing driveway ingress and egress from the site will be maintained. With the proposed improvements along the project’s frontage, the project will be in compliance with all requirements of the City’s Department of Public Works.

3. Public protection services (e.g. Fire protection, Sheriff protection, etc.) are readily available; and
The project will have public protection services provided by both the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LASD) and Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD), and will not require any additional resources or services from those organizations as a result of its operation. The proposal would also be required to comply with all applicable requirements of the LACFD and LASD.

4. The provision of utilities (e.g. potable water, schools. Solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.) is adequate to serve the site.

The proposed use would be located within an existing commercial area, which is located within a developed urbanized area with available and adequate utilities to serve the site.

The proposed project would connect to this existing infrastructure on-site.

SECTION 4: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS FOR THE RELOCATION OR DEMOLITION OF A HISTORIC RESOURCE. As required by Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) Section

17.64.100, the City Council must approve the relocation or demolition of a property or structure that has been designated as a historic resource. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council determine as follows:

A. That the City Council must make findings to relocate a historic structure. Alternatively, upon completion of environmental review, if any, and upon making the determination that relocation is infeasible and there are no feasible alternatives to demolition, the Council may direct the Building Official to issue the permit for demolition.

As identified in the letter provided by the Santa Clarita Historical Society, relocation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building is not feasible. In addition, the historical integrity of the building has been severely compromised by a remodel in 1968. No interior features remain from its use as a County Courthouse. As described above, the project is consistent with the previously prepared EIR for the OTNSP, including MM-CUL-1. The applicant will record the building in accordance with Historic Architectural Building Survey, install a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, place a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and make a monetary contribution of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts. Therefore, the requirements of the SCMC and

1.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
the OTNSP for the delisting and demolition of a building designated as a historic resource have been met.

SECTION 5: FINDINGS FOR ADJUSTMENT PERMIT. As required by Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) Section 17.24.100, based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the Planning Commission determines as follows:

1. That the adjustment does not authorize a use or activity that is not allowed in the zone; The ADJ is consistent with the development standards of the OTNSP and will not authorize a use or activity that is prohibited under the zone. All proposed uses and activities remain within the scope of the OTNSP. The proposed project furthers the goal of creating a vibrant and active Main Street, and would further enliven the area by providing street-level retail space along with additional residential density in this urban environment.

2. That granting an adjustment is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone which would otherwise be denied to the property for which the adjustment is sought; and The proposed project meets the intent and goals of the OTNSP, as described above, and provides meaningful shared amenity space as required by the specific plan. The applicant is providing 10,929 square feet of amenity space, 20 percent less than the 13,560 square feet required by the OTNSP. The provided amenities include an outdoor courtyard with pool and spa, a residential clubhouse/lounge, lobby, garden corridor, and bike room for residents of the proposed development. The provided amenities meet the intent of the OTNSP and the provided square footage is appropriate given the compact, high-density nature of the development, while remaining within the height requirements of the OTNSP.

3. That the granting of the adjustment will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.

As described above, the development, including the grating of the ADJ, will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property as it is providing a reduction to a development standard that has been evaluated and reviewed and all appropriate agencies.

SECTION 6: DETERMINATION; APPROVALS. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council takes the following actions:

Adopt a resolution approving Master Case 24-134, Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24- 017, and Development Review 24-012, for the construction of a new five-story mixeduse building at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue and the delisting and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, subject to the conditions of approval (Exhibit A).

1.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
SECTION 7: RELIANCE ON RECORD. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the Planning Commission in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.

SECTION 8: SUMMARIES OF INFORMATION. All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.

SECTION 9: NOTICE. The Secretary is directed to provide a copy of this Resolution to the Planning Commission and any other person requesting a copy.

SECTION 10: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution becomes effective immediately upon adoption and memorializes the Planning Commission’s final decision made on March 18, 2025.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 2025.

LISA EICHMAN, CHAIRPERSON

PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:

RACHEL CLARK, SECRETARY

PLANNING COMMISSION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
I, Rachel Clark, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18
th day of March, 2025, by the following vote
of the Planning Commission:

AYES: COMMISSIONERS:

NOES: COMMISSIONERS:

1.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:

PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY

1.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION P25-03
MASTER CASE 24-134

DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
In addition to all applicable provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC), the permittee agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of Santa Clarita’s (City) approval of Master Case 24-134.

GENERAL CONDITIONS
GC1. The approval of this project will expire if the approved use is not commenced within two years from the date of this approval, unless it is extended in accordance with the SCMC.

GC2. To the extent the use approved with this project is a different use than previously approved for the property, the prior approval must be terminated along with any associated vested rights to such use, unless such prior approved use is still in operation, or is still within the initial pre-commencement approval period. Once commenced, any discontinuation of the use approved with this project for a continuous period of sixty (60) calendar days or more must terminate the approval of this use along with any associated vested rights to such use. The use must not be re-established or resumed after the sixty (60) day period. Discontinuation must include cessation of a use regardless of intent to resume.

GC3. The permittee may file for an extension of the conditionally-approved project before the date of expiration. If such an extension is requested, it must be filed not later than 60 days before the date of expiration.

GC4. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, the term “permittee” includes the permittee and any other persons, corporation, or other entity making use of this grant. The permittee must defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this project by the City, including any related environmental approvals. In the event the City becomes aware of any such claim, action, or proceeding, the City will promptly notify the permittee. If the City fails to notify the permittee or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee is not thereafter responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.

Nothing contained in this condition prohibits the City from participating in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, if both of the following occur: 1) the City bears its own attorneys’ fees and costs; and 2) the City defends the action in good faith. The permittee is not required to pay or perform any settlement unless the settlement is approved by the permittee.

GC5. The permittee and property owner must comply with all inspection requirements as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director (Director).

1.b
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

GC6. The project site must be developed and/or used in the manner requested and must be in substantial conformity with the plans date-stamped on file, unless revisions and/or additional conditions are specifically required herein.

GC7. This approval runs with the land. All rights and obligations of this approval, including the responsibility to comply with the Conditions of Approval, are binding upon permittee’s successors in interest. The Conditions of Approval may be modified, terminated, or abandoned in accordance with applicable law including, without limitation, the SCMC.

GC8. Any proposed deviations from the Exhibits, Project Description, or Conditions of Approval must be submitted to the Director for review and approval. Any unapproved deviations from the project approval will constitute a violation of the permit approval.

GC9. When Exhibits and/or written Conditions of Approval are in conflict, the written Conditions of Approval prevail.

GC10. The effectiveness of this project will be suspended for the time period that any Condition of Approval is appealed whether administratively or as part of a legal action filed in a court of competent jurisdiction. If any Condition of Approval is invalidated by a court of law, the project must be reviewed by the City and substitute conditions may be imposed.

GC11. The permittee is responsible for ascertaining and paying all City fees as required by the SCMC. This condition serves as notice, pursuant to Government Code § 66020(d) that the City is imposing development impact fees (DIFs) upon the project in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000, et seq.) and the SCMC. The permittee is informed that it may protest DIFs in accordance with Government Code § 66020.

GC12. The permittee must sign these Conditions of Approval, to acknowledge acceptance, within 30 days from the date of approval by the City Council.

GC13. The City will only issue permits for the development when the construction documents (e.g., building plans) substantially comply with the approved plans. Substantial conformity is determined by the Director.

GC14. This decision is not effective until permittee acknowledges acceptance of all project conditions and any appeal period has lapsed, or a waiver of right to appeal is filed or if there is an appeal, until a final decision has been made on the appeal. By use of the entitlements granted by a development application, the permittee acknowledges agreement with the Conditions of Approval.

GC15. Anything which is not shown on the application/plans, or which is not specifically approved, or which is not in compliance with this section, is not approved. Any application and/or plans which are defective as to, without limitation, omission, dimensions, scale, use, colors, materials, encroachments, easements, etc., will render any entitlements granted by this approval null and void. Construction must cease until all

1.b
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

requirements of this approval are complied with. Development entitlements may be withheld until violations of the SCMC are abated.

GC16. The City will not issue a final certificate of occupancy until the permittee complies with all project conditions.

GC17. Permittee must reimburse the City for all attorneys' fees expended by the City that are directly related to the processing of this project. The City will not issue a Final Certificate of Occupancy or other final occupancy approval until all attorneys' fees are paid by the permittee.

PLANNING DIVISION
PL1. The permittee is granted approval to construct the Newhall Mixed-Use Project, including a five-story mixed use building located on the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project includes 5,223 square feet of first-floor commercial space, 78 residential units on floors two through five, and subterranean and first floor garaged parking consistent with the approved plans on file for Master Case 24-134.

PL2. The construction of the project must be consistent with the approved plans, elevations, colors, materials, and other elements on file with the Planning Division. Any modification to the approved project and plans is subject to further review and approval of the Director.

PL3. The building is approved at the heights shown on the approved elevations and cannot exceed 55 feet in height. Architectural enhancements extending above the roofline are permitted only as shown on the approved plans and may not exceed an additional 12 feet in height.

PL4. The permittee is providing less parking than required by the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP) pursuant to Government Code § 65863.2. To address the potential for a substantially negative impact to residential and commercial parking within one-half mile of the project site, the permittee must provide a minimum of 122 parking stalls on-site (1.56 stalls per unit residential parking ratio). Tandem stalls are permitted as shown on the approved site plan. Guest parking is satisfied with 20 public on-street stalls (0.25 stalls per unit guest parking ratio).

PL5. In lieu of constructing 12 parking stalls for the commercial portion of the project, the permittee is required to pay $70,261.20 ($5,855.10 per required parking stall) into the OTNSP Parking In-Lieu Fee Program before the Building Official issues any building permit. This fee is subject to revision and the applicant will be responsible for the fee in place at the time the fee is paid
PL6. Before any permit is issued including, without limitation, a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, the permittee must complete all required recordation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, as required by the OTNSP Environmental Impact

1.b
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

Report Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and the permittee’s commitments to preserving the building’s history as approved by the City Council.

PL7. Before the Building Official issues a demolition permit, the permittee must donate $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts.

PL8. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install a commemorative plaque on the building exterior and provide an art installation within the lobby to commemorate the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building.

PL9. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must obtain a Temporary Use Permit and install two murals on the North Elevation as shown on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division.

PL10. The uses in the commercial building are subject to the permitted use chart for the AE zone of the OTNSP.

PL11. All roof-mounted and ground-mounted equipment must be screened from public view.

PL12. No signage is approved by this permit. All future signage requires a sign permit application in accordance with the OTNSP. Exposed neon is not permitted.

Landscaping Conditions
LR1. Before the City Engineer issues grading permit(s), the permittee must provide final landscape, lighting and irrigation plans (Landscape Document Package) for the Director’s review and approval. The Landscape Document Package must be prepared by a California-registered landscape architect and must be designed with the plant palette suitable for Santa Clarita (Sunset Western Garden Book Zone 18, minimum winter night temperatures typically 20º to 30º F; maximum summer high temperatures typically 105º F to 110º F). The Landscape Document Package must meet the design criteria of the State Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance as well as all other SCMC requirements.

LR2. The permittee is required to pay all associated fees to the City before the release of the approved Landscape Document Package for the project.

LR3. The permittee must coordinate with the Director of Administrative Services regarding any landscaping installed on City right-of-way. The Director of Administrative Services must review the landscape and irrigation plans when submitted, and all such landscaping must be approved by the Director of Administrative Services before installation. The permittee must receive final approval for the installed landscape before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy.

LR4. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install all proposed irrigation and landscaping, including irrigation controllers, staking, mulching, etc., to the satisfaction of the Director. The Director may impose inspection fees for more than one landscape installation inspection.

1.b
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

LR5. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must submit to the Director a letter from the project landscape architect certifying that all landscape materials and irrigation were installed and function according to the approved Landscape Document Package.

ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION
General Requirements
EN1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must provide an approval letter from Southern California Edison (Distribution Division and/or Transmission Division, as appropriate) and from all other affected utilities for the proposed grading and improvements adjacent to their existing facilities, as required by the City Engineer.

EN2. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, all new and existing power lines and overhead cables less than 34 KV within or fronting the project site must be installed underground by the permittee.

Certificate of Compliance Requirements
EN3. Before the Building Official issues any building permit, a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment encompassing all parcels within the boundaries of this project prepared by or under the direction of a person licensed to practice land surveying in the State of California must be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder; in compliance with applicable law
Grading and Geology Requirements
EN4. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit a grading plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. The grading plan must be based on a detailed engineering geotechnical report specifically approved by the geologist and/or soils engineer that addresses all submitted recommendations, including seismic hazards associated with liquefaction.

EN5. Before the Building Official issues building permit, the permittee must construct all grading and drainage facilities within the project site, obtain rough grade certifications, and a compaction report approved by the City Engineer, or designee.

EN6. This project anticipates export of 18,972 CY of dirt. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit for this project, the permittee must submit a copy of the grading permit for the receiving site and an exhibit of the proposed haul route. The permittee is responsible to obtain approval from all applicable agencies for the dirt hauling operation.

A. The permittee must comply with the following requirements for the dirt hauling operation:
i. Obtain an encroachment permit for the work.

1.b
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

ii. The hours of operation must be between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm. iii. Provide non-stop street sweeping service on all City streets along the haul route during all hours of work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. iv. Provide traffic control and flagging personnel along the haul route to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

B. The permittee must pay a Haul Route Pavement Repair Security Cash Deposit (Deposit) of $75,000, which may be increased or decreased based upon an estimated cost to complete the repairs of streets damaged during the dirt hauling operation. The limits and scope of the repairs is determined by the City Engineer. To receive a refund of the Deposit, the permittee or subsequent property owners must complete the pavement repairs to the satisfaction of the City Engineer within one year from the completion of the dirt hauling operation. If the pavement repairs are not completed within one year, the City may use the Deposit to complete the repairs. Any funds remaining at the completion of the repairs will be refunded to the permittee. If the Deposit is insufficient to complete the repairs, the City will seek additional funds from the permittee.

C. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any pavement damaged by the dirt hauling operation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The limits of the road repairs must be consistent with the approved haul route.

EN7. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must obtain and submit to Engineering Services Division a notarized Letter of Permission for review and approval for grading over easements/outside of the property lines from the affected easement holder/adjacent property owner(s).

Drainage Requirements
EN8. Before the City Engineer, or designee issues a grading permit, the permittee must have the site drainage study approved by the City Engineer demonstrating that postdevelopment flows from the site will not be increased from pre-development flows, or mitigate for the increase.

Water Quality Requirements
EN9. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit to Engineering Services Division for review and approval an Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan.

Street Light Relocation Requirements
EN10. Before street plan approval, the permittee must submit a revised Street Light Plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must relocate the existing street light along Railroad Avenue per the approved revised plan, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

1.b
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

Street Improvement Requirements
EN11. Before the revised street plan approval and any construction within public street right-ofway, the permittee must submit to the City Engineer or designee a revised street improvement plan for review and approval to obtain encroachment permits from the City Engineer, or designee.

EN12. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee is required to dedicate a portion of its property to City for public right-of-way to meet the requirements of SCMC Section

17.55, creating a clear sight triangle ensuring unobstructed views for drivers. Permittee may, but is not required to, reserve property rights to include all projections, such as awnings, within the airspace of the dedicated public right-of-way. Such reservation must be approved as to form by the City Attorney.

EN13. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee must submit a street tree location plan to the Urban Forestry Administrator for review and approval. The plan must include proposed sewer lateral locations, storm drain infrastructure, and trees must not conflict with the proposed infrastructure.

EN14. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an Americans with Disability Act (ADA) compliant Curb Ramp (per the Standard Plans for Public Works Construction (SPPWC), Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) along the property frontage corner at the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street and dedicate necessary easement to the City, as directed by the City Engineer.

EN15. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an ADA compliance Curb Ramp (per SPPWC Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) at all three other corners of the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street per the State of California DOT Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 82-06 and as directed by the City Engineer. Railroad Avenue is designated as a State Route and any modification at the intersection, requires existing nonstandard curb ramps to be reconstructed to current standards per DIB 82-06.

EN16. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must dedicate sidewalk easements sufficient to encompass ADA requirements for sidewalks installed with drive approaches per the current SPPWC Standard Plan 110-2, Type C, or equivalent.

EN17. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must replace the abandoned driveway(s) with standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, and pavement in accordance with SPPWC standards and in compliance with OTNSP, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A revised street plan and encroachment permit is required.

1.b
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

EN18. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any broken or damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk, and refurbish the half section of pavement on streets abutting the project, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Sewer Improvement Requirements
EN19. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the proposed building(s) lateral line(s) must connect to the existing public sewer main in Market Street (8” sewer per PC CI2520), and the permittee must coordinate with the Building & Safety Division regarding payment of additional annexation fees, if required, to annex the property into the County Sanitation District.

EN20. The on-site sewer is a privately maintained. Before grading plan approval, the permittee must submit an “on-site sewer plan.” The “on-site sewer plan” are designed per the California Plumbing Code and approved by the Building Official before Grading Plan approval.

EN21. Before the Building Official issues Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct all sewer upgrades per the approved sewer area study, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

EN22. The permittee must also obtain a permit from LA County Building Official to install a new saddle on the existing public sewer by LA County Sewer Maintenance Division, if the wye does not exist on the existing public sewer.

Bond, Fees and Miscellaneous Requirements
EN23. Before City Engineer, or designee issue encroachment permits for public improvements (Street), the permittee, by agreement with the City Engineer, must guarantee installation of the improvements through faithful performance bonds, letters of credit or any other acceptable means in a form approved by the City Attorney. Certificate of Occupancy/Occupancies are withheld if the improvements are not completed.

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION
TE1. Before the City Engineer issues street plan approval, the permittee must show on the street plan drive approaches using a modified commercial driveway design (APWA 110- 2, Type C or equivalent) that will provide a street/drive approach transition with a maximum algebraic grade difference of 10%. Construction details will be shown on the street plan providing a transition no greater than this maximum.

TE2. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must modify the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street to eliminate the curb bulbout on the southbound (Railroad Avenue) approach.

1.b
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

TE3. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must restripe Market Street per the attached exhibit (Striping Exhibit – Market Street) to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.

TE4. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee will pay the applicable Bridge and Thoroughfare (B&T) District Fee to implement the Circulation Element of the General Plan as a means of mitigating the traffic impact of this project. This project is located in the Via Princessa B&T District. The current rate for this District is $22,710. The B&T rate is subject to change and is based on the rate at the time of payment.

Standard B&T Fee Calculation:

Apartments = the number of units (78) x the district rate ($22,710) x 0.7 = $1,239,966 B&T District fees for non-residential uses on an under-utilized parcel that does not include a land division must be calculated as follows:

Retail Commercial = 5,223 sf x $22,710 x 5 = $36,306
16,335

LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
FD1. All fire lanes must be clear of all encroachments and must be maintained in accordance with Section 503 of County of Los Angeles Fire Code, Title 32, as adopted by the SCMC, which requires all weather access. All weather access may require paving.

FD2. Main Street, Market Street & Railroad Avenue serve as the Fire Apparatus Access roads for this project. For buildings where the vertical distance between the access roadway and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet from the lowest level of the Fire Apparatus Access Road, provide a minimum unobstructed width of 28 feet, exclusive of shoulders and an unobstructed vertical clearance “clear to sky” Fire Apparatus Access Roads to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. At least one required access route meeting this condition must be located such that the edge of the Fire Apparatus Access Roadway, not including shoulders, that is closest to the building being served, is between 10 feet and 30 feet from the building, as determined by the fire code official, and must be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the Fire Apparatus Access Road is positioned must be approved by the fire code official (Fire Code 503.1.1; 503.2.1.2; 503.2.1.2.2 & 503.2.1.2.2.1).

FD3. The dimensions of the approved Fire Apparatus Access Roads must be maintained as originally approved by the fire code official (Fire Code 503.2.2.1).

FD4. Fire Apparatus Access Roads must be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing 75,000 pounds and must be surfaced to provide all1.b Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

weather driving capabilities (Fire Code 503.2.3).

FD5. A minimum 5-foot-wide approved firefighter access walkway leading from the Fire Department Access Road to all required openings in the building's exterior walls must be provided for firefighting and rescue purposes (Fire Code 504.1).

FD6. Security barriers, visual screen barriers or other obstructions must not be installed on the roof of any building in such a manner as to obstruct firefighter access or egress in the event of fire or other emergency. Parapets must not exceed 42 inches from the top of the parapet to the roof surface on more than two sides. These sides should face an access roadway or yard sufficient to accommodate ladder operations (Fire Code 504.5).

FD7. All fire hydrants must measure 6”x 4"x 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal, and must be installed in accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code, as adopted by the SCMC (Fire Code 501.4).

FD8. The required fire flow for the public fire hydrants for this project is 3500 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure for 3 hours. Three public fire hydrants flowing simultaneously may be used to achieve the required fire flow (Fire Code 507.3 & Appendix B).

FD9. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system is required for the proposed buildings within this development. Submit design plans to the Fire Department Sprinkler Plan Check Unit for review and approval before installation.

FD10. Install 1 public fire hydrant as noted by the Fire Department. All required public fire hydrants must be installed, tested and accepted before beginning construction. All fire hydrants must measure 6”x 4"x 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal, and must be installed in accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code, as adopted by the SCMC (Fire Code 501.4).

FD11. A digital copy of the Water Plans for the required public fire hydrant must be submitted to the Fire Department's Land Development Unit for review and approval. Compliance is required before project construction. Submittal must be provided through EPIC-LA using the following Plan Type: Fire Land Development–Water Plan & System Review.

BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION
Plans and Permits
BS1. Construction drawings must be prepared and submitted to the Building & Safety Division for plan review and building permit issuance. Supporting documents; such as structural and energy calculations, and geotechnical reports must be included with the plan submittal.

BS2. The submitted site plan must show all parcel/lot lines, easements, fire separation distances, restricted use areas, etc. Any construction proposed in an easement must obtain the easement owner’s written permission or the easement must be removed. Parcel lines

1.b
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

that overlap any proposed buildings must be removed (lot line adjustment) before the Building Official issues a building permit.

BS3. Construction drawings must incorporate mitigation measures identified by a noise study prepared by a qualified noise engineer.

Electric Vehicle Parking Spaces for the residential portion of the project per CalGreen BS4. EV Ready parking spaces with receptacles for the multi-family portion of the project must be equipped with low power Level 2 EV charging receptacles at the rate of 40% of the total number of parking spaces provided for the residential use. For the receptacle power source and configuration see CalGreen 4.106.4.2.2.

BS5. Additionally, EV Ready parking spaces with EV chargers for the multi-family portion of the project must be equipped with Level 2 EV chargers at the rate of 10% of the total number of parking spaces provided for the residential use. At least 50% of these EV chargers must be equipped with J1772 connectors.

Accessibility for the residential portion of the project BS6. All applicable disabled access requirements of California Building Standards Code (CBSC) Chapter 11A, as adopted by the SCMC, must be shown on the architectural plans versus civil plans.

BS7. If the project receives any public funds such as tax credits, incentives or similar programs the multi-family project must comply with the public housing requirements of the California Building Code, Chapter 11B.

Soil Reports and Grading
BS8. A complete soils and geology investigation report will be required for this project. The report must be formally submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The recommendations of the report must be followed and incorporated into the plans for the project.

Hazard Zones
BS9. Indicate on the cover sheet of the plans this project IS NOT LOCATED in a Fire Hazard Zone, IS NOT LOCATED in the Flood Hazard Zone, and IS NOT LOCATED in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone.

Additional Information
BS10. Separate Demolition Permit will be required to raze any building to be removed on the site. Clearances from the City Planning Division, City Environmental Services (for construction demolition deposit) and AQMD will be required before the Building Official issues a demolition permit.

1.b
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
ES1. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must demonstrate appropriate, detailed safety measures for resident access to organics bins as well as to bins with chute connections.

ES2. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must provide confirmation to utilize “push-out” service provided by the waste hauler, to avoid the need for a bin staging area along Market Street.

ES3. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must provide elevations and/or site plans for the chute system that identify the correct location and placement of both chutes and corresponding bins within the trash rooms.

ES4. Before a building, demolition, or grading permit is issued, the permittee must submit a Construction and Demolition Materials Management Plan (CDMMP) and receive approval from the Environmental Services Manager or Designee if the project meets the parameters below (S.C.M.C.§15.46.300):

A. All demolition projects (regardless of valuation), all commercial projects of new construction or additions over 1,000 square feet and all tenant improvements, alterations or new construction valued greater than $200,000, all new residential construction projects and all residential additions and improvements that increase building area, volume, or size must comply with the City’s Construction and Demolition Materials (C&D) Recycling Ordinance. S.C.M.C.§15.46.200 B. A minimum of 65% of the entire project’s inert (dirt, rock, bricks, etc.) waste and 65% of the remaining C&D waste must be recycled or reused rather than disposing in a landfill. S.C.M.C.§15.46.610 and CALGreen sections 4.408, 5.408, 301.1.1 and 301.3
C. For renovation or tenant improvement projects and new construction projects, a deposit of 2% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. For demolition projects, a deposit of 10% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. The full deposit will be returned to the permittee upon proving that 65% of the inert and remaining C&D waste was recycled or reused. S.C.M.C.§15.46.400
ES5. All projects within the City that are not self-hauling waste materials must use one of the City’s franchised haulers for temporary and roll-off bin collection services.

S.C.M.C.§15.44.220

1.b
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION
PR1. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must pay the required Park Dedication Fee equal to the value of the amount of land established per the City’s General Plan, “Parks and Recreation Element.” The permittee may be required to provide a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the fair market value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project. Final Parkland dedication obligation calculation to be based on current density per dwelling and fair market value rates at time of payment. An estimate is attached.

TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DIVISION
TS1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a Grading Permit, the permittee must demonstrate compliance with SCMC Section 17.51.007 (Connected City Infrastructure Program) requiring conduit from a location to be determined in the public right-of-way to the Minimum Point of Entry (MPOE) or similar location within the project area that serves as the main telecommunications closet. Conduit for this condition must be reflected on development plans.

TRANSIT DIVISION
TR1. The current Transit Impact Fee is $216 per residential unit. Permittee must pay the fee in place at the time of building permit issuance.

SPECIAL DISTRICTS
SD1. This permittee is required to protect and preserve in place all existing Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) landscape located within the public right of way along Main Street and Market Street. For this project, landscape includes without limitation, trees, shrubs, irrigation, lighting, electrical outlets, pilasters with Trex / wood cross rails, decking, brick pavers, brick planters, raised planters, wrought iron, potted plants on city irrigation, and any other amenity items located within the existing landscape planters and walkways.

SD2. This project is located within the Downtown Newhall Corridor and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. As a result, all required landscape improvements must be consistent with the Old Town Newhall Specific Plans and design guidelines.

SD3. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to install full landscape improvements along Main Street where the current drive approach to Mac’s Pool supply is located. These improvements must close the gap, and connect the two existing planters located on opposite sides of the drive approach. The current preliminary plan is showing a Schinus molle “California pepper” tree as a proposed tree in this area. Schinus molle is not an approved tree and must be replaced with an approved species.

1.b
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

SD4. New landscape includes without limitation: connecting to and extending the brick pavers (walkway), existing planters, irrigation, and the installation of new planters consisting of trees shrubs, lighting and other landscape features similar to those in the existing planters.

SD5. Before the City Engineer issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit final landscape plans prepared by a licensed landscape architect and receive approval by LMD.

SD6. Existing parkway trees and landscape along Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue are required to be protected and preserved in place. This may include having to install approved temporary protective fencing around the edge of the planters to protect trees, shrubs, irrigation and other landscape amenities located within the planter during construction.

SD7. Unless waived by the Director of Administrative Services, the planter located at the back edge of the sidewalk shared by both Mac’s Pool Supply and the adjacent KHTS building must be protected and preserved in place. If this planter cannot be protected in place, the permittee will be required to repair and / or replace this planter to the satisfaction of the Director of Administrative Services.

SD8. Full parkway landscape improvements will be required along both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. These landscape improvements must be consistent with the improvements currently along Railroad Avenue and 5th Street fronting the Hotel Lexen. This includes installing amenities such as bollard / hitching post, and protected electrical outlets.

SD9. If at any time during the project, the irrigation to any existing landscape is turned off, the permittee and their contractors will be responsible to provide supplemental irrigation / water to all trees and shrubs throughout the duration of the project by any means necessary at no cost to the City. Trees and shrubs which die, or decline to a condition unacceptable by Director of Administrative Services, must be replaced by the permittee at no cost to the City.

SD10. The permittee is responsible for replacing any missing landscape shrubs in the planters fronting the project site.

SD11. The permittee is responsible for replacing or repairing any damaged or missing pavers or decking located within the public right-of-way fronting the project on both Main Street and Market Street.

SD12. The permittee is required to show all existing landscape which fronts the project on Main Street to scale on all future sets of site plans including, without limitation; demolition, grading, construction and landscape plans (preliminary and final).

SD13. At no time is any construction material, equipment or vehicles permitted to be stored or placed within a landscape planter where trees and shrubs exist. At no time is any form of hazardous material including runoff water from washing and cleaning of tools and equipment be permitted to enter any existing or proposed landscape planter.

1.b
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

SD14. The permittee is advised that parkway trees are maintained by the City’s LMD. At no time will any parkway tree be pruned for sign visibility. This information must be included with all paperwork for all future tenants.

SD15. Any impacts to root system of an existing City maintained tree must be approved by the City Arborist. Work completed within the “Tree Protected Zone” (TPZ) must be completed by hand in the presence of a qualified consulting arborist with documented experience with monitoring trees during construction. The permittee will be required to retain the services of a qualified consulting arborist to perform all required monitoring.

This will be completed at no cost to the City of Santa Clarita.

Landscape Maintenance Districts
SD16. These parcels are located within LMD Zone 28, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of landscapes located in the Newhall area. Before the Building Official issues a Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to financially contribute to LMD Zone 28 in a manner reflective of this zone’s assessment methodology.

SD17. These parcels are located within LMD Areawide Zone 2008-1, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of landscaped medians on major thoroughfares located throughout the City of Santa Clarita. Before the Building Official issues a Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to financially contribute to the Areawide Zone in a manner reflective of this zone’s assessment methodology.

Streetlight Maintenance District
SD18. These parcels were originally annexed by County of Los Angeles into a Lighting District with a maximum assessment of $12.38 per EBU (Equivalent Benefit Unit) without a cost of living index/escalator. The permittee will be required to annex all parcels into the Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District (SCLLD), Street-lighting Zone B. The District funds the operation and maintenance of various landscaping and lighting improvements throughout the City that provide special benefits to properties within the District.

SD19. As part of any required street improvements, the permittee may be required to add, relocate, or update streetlights along both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. All streetlights and their locations must be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Clarita Streetlight Maintenance District (SMD).

1.b
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.c
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Exhibit A Attachment #1 (Market Street Striping) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) City of Santa Clarita
Park Dedication Fee Requirement
Project Description: Old Town Newhall Mixed-Use
Tract/MC#: 24-134
Housing Density / 5 Acres **FMV Sub 20% Off Site In Lieu Units Dwelling Per 1000 Total Improvements Fee
78 2.870 0.005 $880,000 $984,984 $196,997 $1,181,981
Total Density 224
Total Acres due 1.11930
30% Max. Park Credit 0.33579
With Park Credit 0.78351 $689,489 $137,898 $827,387
TOTAL FEES DUE WITH 30% CREDIT= $827,387
TOTAL FEES DUE WITHOUT CREDIT= $1,181,981
Potential Private Park Total Total Max. Credit Katie Knybel Credit SQ. FT. Acres 30%
$354,594 14,627 0.33579 0.33579 Date: 2/6/2025
Method of calculation per the City of Santa Clarita General Plan - Parks and Recreation Element:

DU X Population X 5 acres per X **FMV = Subtotal X 1.2 = In Lieu Fee per DU 1000 people Buildable acre
Estimate Reviewed by:
**The applicant will be required to provide a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the Fair Market Value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project.
2/6/2025

1.d
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Exhibit A Attachment #2 (Parks Planning Fee Estimate) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER

AERIAL AND ZONING MAP
Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Development Review 24-012, and Architectural Design Review 24-017 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026)
Aerial Map

1.e
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Aerial and Zoning Map (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Zoning Map

ZONING KEY
– Old Town Newhall Specific Plan – Arts & Entertainment – Old Town Newhall Specific Plan – Neighborhood
S:\CD\!PLANNING DIVISION\CURRENT\!2024\MC24-134 (ADJ, ADR, DR, CUP, MUP Market & Main Mixed-Use)\5. Planning Commission\3. MC24-134 Aerial and Zoning Map.doc

AE (OTNSP)

N (OTNSP)
Project Site

1.e
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Aerial and Zoning Map (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

SITE & FLOOR PLANS
Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026)

1.f
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Site & Floor Plans (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) N
0' 15' 60' 30'
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"

RAMP UP

EXIT TO RAILROAD AVE
38B 40B 39B38A 40A 39A 41 42 43 44
45B45A
46B46A
47B47A
48B48A
50B50A
49B49A
51B 52B 53B 54B
54A 53A 52A 51A
55 56 57 58 29 60 61 62 63
78 77 76A
76B
75A75B
74A 73A
73B 74B
72A72B
71A 70A
70B 71B
69A69B
68A68B
67A67B
66A
66B
65A65B
64A64B

RESIDENTIAL PARKING
67 STALLS

UTILITIES

MECHANICAL
ROOM
STAIRS
STAIRS
ELEV. ELEV . RM

STORAGE

STORAGE

UTILITIES
Planning Submittal
Santa Clarita, CA
Copyright 2024 SAE
Old Town Newhall−Mixed Use Development
BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN A05

PROJECT INFORMATION

PARKING TABULATION
EV READY SPACES − 27
EV CHARGING SPACES − 7
ACCESSIBLE EVCS − 1
ACCESSIBLE SPACES − 1
VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES − 1
TANDAM SPACES − 52 (26)
SINGLE SPACE − 15
TOTAL BASEMENT PARKING − 67 STALLS

1.f
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Site & Floor Plans (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) N
0' 15' 30' 60'
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"





BIKE /

FLEX SPACE
348 SF



RAMP DN

FROM RAILROAD AVE

EXIT / ENTRYFROM MARKET ST
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
21 20 19 18 17 16
11A 12A
11B 12B
37A
37B
36A
35B 36B
35A 34A 32A 33A
32B 34B 33B
31A
31B
30A
30B
26A26B
23 25A
25B
ELEV.



RESIDENTIAL
LOBBY

MAILROOM

LEASING OFFICE


24 28A 29A
28B 29B
27A
27B

 22

MAIN STREET

MARKET STREET


RAILROAD AVENUE

13A 14A 15A
13B 14B 15B

PARKING SETBACK
35' - 9"
164' - 10 1/8"
40' - 0" MINIMUM STACKING DISTANCE
20' - 0"
MIN. STACKING DISTANCE




 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      

PARKING ENTRY/EXIT
(RIGHT IN, RIGHT

OUT ONLY)

1.f
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Site & Floor Plans (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) N
0' 15' 60' 30'
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"
POOL
SPA

CENTRAL

COURTYARD
(OPEN TO SKY)

GARDEN CORRIDOR

LOUNGE /

AMENITIES
1A
1A
1A
1A
1A
1A 1A 1A
2A
2B
2B
2E
2D 3A
2G
2F 2F
1B
Planning Submittal
Santa Clarita, CA
Copyright 2024 SAE
Old Town Newhall−Mixed Use Development
SECOND FLOOR PLAN A07

PROJECT INFORMATION
UNIT TABULATION (2ND FLOOR)
1 BEDROOM UNITS − 9
2 BEDROOM UNITS − 8
3 BEDROOM UNITS − 1
TOTAL UNITS − 18

1.f
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Site & Floor Plans (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) N
0' 15' 60' 30'
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"
1A 1A
1A
1A
1A
1A
1A 1A 1A 2A
2B
2B
2C
2E
2D 3A
2G
2F 2F
1B
Planning Submittal
Santa Clarita, CA
Copyright 2024 SAE
Old Town Newhall−Mixed Use Development
THIRD FLOOR PLAN A08

PROJECT INFORMATION
UNIT TABULATION (3RD FLOOR)
1 BEDROOM UNITS − 10
2 BEDROOM UNITS − 9
3 BEDROOM UNITS − 1
TOTAL UNITS − 20

1.f
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Site & Floor Plans (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) N
0' 15' 60' 30'
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"
1A 1A
1A
1A
1A
1A
1A 1A 1A
2A
2B
2B
2C
2E
2D 3A
2G
2F 2F
1B
Planning Submittal
Santa Clarita, CA
Copyright 2024 SAE
Old Town Newhall−Mixed Use Development
FOURTH FLOOR PLAN A09

PROJECT INFORMATION
UNIT TABULATION (4TH FLOOR)
1 BEDROOM UNITS − 10
2 BEDROOM UNITS − 9
3 BEDROOM UNITS − 1
TOTAL UNITS − 20

1.f
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Site & Floor Plans (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) N
0' 15' 60' 30'
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"
1A 1A
1A
1A
1A
1A
2A 1A 1A 1A
2B
2B
2C
2E
2D 3A
2G
2F 2F
1B
Planning Submittal
Santa Clarita, CA
Copyright 2024 SAE
Old Town Newhall−Mixed Use Development
FIFTH FLOOR PLAN A10

PROJECT INFORMATION
UNIT TABULATION (5TH FLOOR)
1 BEDROOM UNITS − 10
2 BEDROOM UNITS − 9
3 BEDROOM UNITS − 1
TOTAL UNITS − 20

1.f
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Site & Floor Plans (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

ELEVATIONS & RENDERINGS
Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026)

1.g
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Elevations & Renderings (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) 0' 10' 20' 40'
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5

ROOF LEVEL
MAX. HEIGHT
8' - 10" 51' - 2"
60' - 0"
9' - 4 7/8" 9' - 6 3/8" 9' - 6 3/8" 9' - 6 3/8" 13' - 2" 



 



          
 


























 























 

   


1.g
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Elevations & Renderings (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) 0' 10' 20' 40'
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5

ROOF LEVEL
MAX. HEIGHT
60' - 0"
8' - 10" 51' - 2"
9' - 4 7/8" 9' - 6 3/8" 9' - 6 3/8" 9' - 6 3/8" 13' - 2" 



 




 

  
  


























 























 

 


  
 


1.g
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Elevations & Renderings (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) 0' 10' 20' 40'
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5

ROOF LEVEL
MAX. HEIGHT
8' - 10" 51' - 2"
60' - 0"
9' - 4 7/8" 9' - 6 3/8" 9' - 6 3/8" 9' - 6 3/8" 13' - 2" 



 
   


  





























 























 


  
   


1.g
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Elevations & Renderings (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) 0' 10' 20' 40'
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5

ROOF LEVEL
MAX. HEIGHT
9' - 4 7/8" 9' - 6 3/8" 9' - 6 3/8" 9' - 6 3/8" 13' - 2" 8' - 10" 51' - 2"
60' - 0"
    




 





























 























 


     

1.g
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Elevations & Renderings (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) 0GYJCNN/KZGF7UG 'NGXCVKQPU
241,'%6%10%'26
/CKP5VTGGV0GYJCNN%#

SAE ARCHITECTURE

INTERIORS
/CKP5VTGGV'NGXCVKQP
Packet P
0GYJCNN/KZGF7UG 'NGXCVKQPU
241,'%6%10%'26
/CKP5VTGGV0GYJCNN%#

SAE ARCHITECTURE

INTERIORS
4CKNTQCF#XGPWG'NGCXVKQP
Packet P
 


SAE

ARCHITECTURE

INTERIORS

Packet P
 


SAE

ARCHITECTURE

INTERIORS

Packet P

NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
[X] County Clerk [ ] State Clearinghouse
County of Los Angeles 1400 Tenth Street
12400 E. Imperial Hwy., Rm. 1007 Sacramento, CA 95815
Norwalk, CA 90650

PROJECT
NAME:

Newhall Mixed-Use Project: Master Case 24-134

PROJECT
LOCATION:
24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 2831-012- 022 through -026)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:

The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit (ADJ), Development Review (DR), and Architectural Design Review (ADR) for the redevelopment of the Mac’s Pool Supply (24316 Main Street), Horseshoe on Main (24300 Main Street), and the potentially historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse (22505 Market Street) buildings located on the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project is a full-block development consisting of the demolition of the existing structures to construct a new five-story mixed-use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes approximately 5,300 square feet of commercial floor area and ground-level parking within the building footprint. The upper levels include 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and the first-floor levels. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided from Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requires a CUP to increase the allowable floor area ratio. An MUP with City Council approval is required to demolish the onsite potentially historic building. The applicant is requesting an ADJ for a 20-percent reduction in the amount of shared amenity space to be provided. The subject properties are located in the Arts & Entertainment zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP). The project was contemplated under the OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR.

PROJECT
APPLICANT:

Serrano Development Group
This is to advise that the City of Santa Clarita has made the following determinations regarding the project described above:
1) The project was approved by the [] Director of Community Development [ ] Planning Commission [X] Mayor and City Council on the following date: April 22, 2025.
2) [X] A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Section 15070 {a}). 3) [ ] A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Section 15070 {b}). 4) [ ] An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 5) [ ] An Addendum to the Final EIR was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 6) The project [ ] WILL [X] WILL NOT have a significant impact on the environment. 7) Mitigation measures [ ] WERE [X] WERE NOT made a condition of project approval. 8) A Statement of Overriding Considerations [ ] WAS [X] WAS NOT adopted for this project.

This is to certify that the [X] NEGATIVE DECLARATION [ ] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT [ ] ADDENDUM with record of project approval is available for public review at:

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302
Santa Clarita, California 91355
(661) 255-4330
Contact Person/Title: Emily Rubalcava, Assistant Planner I Signature: ________________________________________________

1.h
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Notice of Determination (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302
Santa Clarita, CA 91355

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPLICATION: Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Development Review 24-012, and Architectural Design Review 24-017
PROJECT APPLICANT: Serrano Development Group
PROJECT LOCATION: 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit (ADJ), Development Review (DR), and Architectural Design Review (ADR) for the redevelopment of the Mac’s Pool Supply (24316 Main Street), Horseshoe on Main (24300 Main Street), and the historical Masonic Lodge/Courthouse (22505 Market Street) buildings located on the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project is a full-block development consisting of the demolition of the existing structures to construct a new five-story mixed-use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes approximately 5,300 square feet of commercial floor area and ground-level parking within the building footprint. The upper levels include 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and the first-floor levels. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided from Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requires a CUP to increase the allowable floor area ratio. An MUP with City Council approval is required to demolish the on-site historic building. The applicant is requesting an ADJ for a 20- percent reduction in the amount of shared amenity space to be provided. The subject properties are located in the Arts & Entertainment zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP).

The City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on this matter on the following date:

DATE: Tuesday, March 18, 2025
TIME: At or after 6:00 p.m.

LOCATION: City Hall, Council Chambers
23920 Valencia Blvd., First Floor
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT: The project was contemplated under the OTNSP Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the EIR. No further action under the California Environmental Quality Act is required.

If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or written correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clarita at, or prior to, the public hearings. If you wish to have written comments included in the materials the Planning Commission receives prior to the public hearing, it must be submitted to the Community Development Department by Friday, March 7, 2025.

For further information regarding this proposal, you may contact the project planner at the City of Santa Clarita, Permit Center, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 140, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Telephone: (661) 255-4330. Website:
www.santaclarita.gov/planning. Send written correspondence to: 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 140, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Project Planner: Emily Rubalcava, Assistant Planner I, [email protected].

Patrick Leclair
Planning Manager
Published: The Signal, February 25, 2025

1.i
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Public Hearing Notice (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

PROJECT SITE
Request for a new mixed-use building
24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026)
N
Project Site

1.i
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Public Hearing Notice (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society | PO Box 221925, Newhall CA 91322-1925 | scvhs.org February 28, 2025
To whom it may concern:

As a longtime supporter of the goals of the City of Santa Clarita’s Downtown Newhall Specific Plan, and after careful consideration, the Board of Directors of the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society (“the Board”) voted unanimously on February 24, 2025, to support the redevelopment of the area of Newhall bounded by Railroad Avenue, Market Street, Main Street, and the building at 24316 Main Street (the former location of Mac’s Pool Supply).

To that end, the Board unanimously recorded its non-opposition to the removal of the building at 24307 Railroad Avenue/22505 Market Street, commonly known as “Ye Olde Courthouse.” The building is listed as one of the City of Santa Clarita’s Historic Resources. The City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance (17.03.145 UDC) states that upon a finding that the removal of a Historic Resource is necessary to proceed with a development project consistent with and supportive of identified goals and objectives of the General Plan,
… the City Council shall direct the property owner to relocate the designated historic structure to a site within the City of Santa Clarita and approved by the City Council. Such relocation may include the assistance of the developer, the City of Santa Clarita, the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society, or other entity as appropriate. Alternatively, upon completion of appropriate environmental review, if any, and upon making the determination that relocation is infeasible and there are no feasible alternatives to demolition, the City Council may direct the Building Official to issue the permit for demolition.

The Board suspects it would be infeasible to relocate the building, whose historical integrity was severely compromised by an unfortunate 1968 remodel. Upon review, the Board is aware that no interior features remain from its use as a County Courthouse (1932-1971). Should the City deem it necessary to issue a demolition permit, the Board believes it appropriate for the City to exact an impact fee from the applicant comparable in amount to the estimated cost of relocating and restoring the building to its original historical condition, such fee revenue to be restricted to the advancement of historical preservation goals within the City of Santa Clarita.

Further, the Board urges the City to require the developer to cooperate with the City and the Historical Society to add plaques in several locations throughout the project to identify the historical uses of the property.

Alan Pollack
President, Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society

1.j
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Letter From Historical Society (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Tuesday, March 11, 2025
City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission
23920 Valencia Blvd.

Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission,
As a citizen of Santa Clarita who cares about downtown Newhall as one of the centers of vitality in our city, I am thrilled to hear developers are going forward with proposing the mixed-use project on the corner of Market Street and Main Street.

This proposed project bears remarkable resemblance to Newhall Crossings a mere two blocks away, and Newhall Crossings is a staple in the fabric of downtown Newhall, providing foot traffic and vitality to the area as well as some very cool businesses and public spaces. Combining its proximity to all the attractions of Main Street and to the transit hub of the Metrolink station, it’s very much somewhere I and many others would love to live. I think more development of the same type could only possibly make downtown Newhall, and Santa Clarita as whole better, so I would love to see this project go through a smooth approval process.

Thank you for your consideration,
Ashe Mahoney

1.k
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) March 10, 2025
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed-use development at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita. As a longtime resident of this city, I have witnessed its remarkable growth and believe that well-planned projects like this one contribute significantly to our community’s economic and social prosperity.

I have lived in Santa Clarita for over 20 years, raising my family here and seeing firsthand the need for additional housing and commercial space. Newhall, in particular, holds historical and cultural significance within our city, and its continued development is essential for maintaining its vibrancy. This project presents an opportunity to enhance the neighborhood while preserving its charm.

The introduction of 78 apartment units will provide much-needed housing, addressing the growing demand for residential options. Additionally, the 5,300 square feet of retail space will attract new businesses, providing greater variety for shopping, dining, and essential services.

This is crucial in sustaining economic growth and creating a more self-sufficient local economy.

The aesthetic appeal of this project is another noteworthy aspect. The Western Victorian architectural style will complement the character of Newhall, maintaining its historical essence while incorporating modern functionality. This blend of old and new will ensure that the area remains an inviting and attractive destination.

We have seen the transformative effects of Newhall Crossings, where new businesses, restaurants, and retail shops have flourished, revitalizing the district. The increase in foot traffic and local engagement has proven that thoughtful development leads to positive economic and social outcomes. The proposed project will build on this momentum, further establishing Newhall as a central hub within Santa Clarita.

For all these reasons, I strongly encourage the approval of this project. The benefits of increased housing, economic stimulation, and enhanced community appeal cannot be overstated. I look forward to seeing this development come to fruition and the continued success of Newhall.

Sincerely,
Beth Wageman

1.k
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Friday, March 7, 2025
City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission
23920 Valencia Blvd.

Santa Clarita, CA 9135
Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission,
On behalf of Care Tucker Style House on Main Street, we are writing to express our support for the Proposed Mixed-Use Development on the Corner of Market St and Main St. We are a women’s fashion brand and retailer trying to bring contemporary fashion and elevated home and gifts to the Santa Clarita community.

As a growing community, Newhall needs continued revitalization and development to sustain its economic momentum. The addition of 78 residential units and 5,300 square feet of retail space will bring more residents and businesses to Old Town Newhall, increasing foot traffic and driving economic growth. This will directly benefit our business as well as the many other existing businesses along Main Street and the Newhall area by expanding their customer base while also providing opportunities for new businesses to establish
themselves in the area. In addition to the residential and retail space, the project includes two levels of parking, which will address the area's need for adequate parking and improve the overall functionality of the development, making it more accessible for residents. Parking remains one of the most talked about concerns among the community, and our clientele, this addition alone would be more than welcomed.

Sincerely,
Care and Jonny Tucker
Owners of Care Tucker Style House on Main St.

1.k
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Christine Munoz
Newhall Refinery
24258 Main st
Old Town Newhall, CA 91321
March 11, 2025
City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission
23920 Valencia Blvd.

Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission,
As a business owner in Old Town Newhall, I want to express my strong support for the proposed mixed-use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. This project represents an exciting opportunity to further establish Old Town Newhall as the premier entertainment and cultural destination within the City of Santa Clarita.

The continued growth and revitalization of Old Town Newhall are essential to attracting more visitors, increasing foot traffic, and supporting local businesses. The addition of new residential units and retail space will bring more activity to the area, creating a lively atmosphere that benefits restaurants, shops, and entertainment venues alike. More people living and spending time in the district means more economic success for the entire community.

Additionally, the inclusion of much-needed parking will improve accessibility and enhance the overall experience for visitors. As our district continues to grow, having convenient parking options will encourage more people to explore and enjoy everything Old Town Newhall has to offer.

With its thoughtful design that blends historic character with modern development, this project aligns perfectly with the vision of making Old Town Newhall a vibrant entertainment hub for Santa Clarita. More visitors, more businesses, and more opportunities for community engagement will help solidify our district as the go-to destination for dining, arts, and nightlife in the region.

I strongly encourage the approval of this project, as it will contribute to the long-term success of Old Town Newhall and further establish it as a thriving cultural and entertainment center for Santa Clarita.

Respectfully,
Christine Munoz
Newhall Refinery
[email protected]

1.k
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Florinda Delgado
Newhall Refinery
24258 Main st
Old Town Newhall, CA 91321
March 11, 2025
City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission
23920 Valencia Blvd.

Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission,
As a business owner in Old Town Newhall, I want to express my strong support for the proposed mixed-use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. This project represents an exciting opportunity to further establish Old Town Newhall as the premier entertainment and cultural destination within the City of Santa Clarita.

The continued growth and revitalization of Old Town Newhall are essential to attracting more visitors, increasing foot traffic, and supporting local businesses. The addition of new residential units and retail space will bring more activity to the area, creating a lively atmosphere that benefits restaurants, shops, and entertainment venues alike. More people living and spending time in the district means more economic success for the entire community.

Additionally, the inclusion of much-needed parking will improve accessibility and enhance the overall experience for visitors. As our district continues to grow, having convenient parking options will encourage more people to explore and enjoy everything Old Town Newhall has to offer.

With its thoughtful design that blends historic character with modern development, this project aligns perfectly with the vision of making Old Town Newhall a vibrant entertainment hub for Santa Clarita. More visitors, more businesses, and more opportunities for community engagement will help solidify our district as the go-to destination for dining, arts, and nightlife in the region.

I strongly encourage the approval of this project, as it will contribute to the long-term success of Old Town Newhall and further establish it as a thriving cultural and entertainment center for Santa Clarita.

Respectfully,
Florinda Delgado
Newhall Refinery
[email protected]

1.k
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Lindsay and Brian Schlick Letter of Support
Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff,
We are writing to offer our full support for the mixed-use development project on Main Street in Newhall. As local business owners in the area and residents living just a mile away from the development, we understand the importance of continued growth in ensuring our community remains vibrant and economically strong.

We have lived in Santa Clarita for over 15 years, and throughout that time, we have watched Newhall transform into a thriving area. The addition of 78 apartment units and 5,300 square feet of retail space will provide critical support to local businesses like ours by attracting more residents and visitors to the area. With more people living and working in Newhall, we will see an increase in foot traffic, which is essential for local businesses to succeed.

The retail spaces in this development offer incredible potential for new businesses, and we are excited to see what will open up in the area. Newhall has become a destination for dining, shopping, and entertainment, and this project will only enhance that appeal.

Moreover, the successful revitalization seen with Newhall Crossings shows that smart development can drive economic growth while maintaining the unique charm of the neighborhood.

This new development is the kind of project that can bring positive change, not just for businesses, but for residents as well. We wholeheartedly support the project and look forward to the continued prosperity it will bring to Newhall.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Lindsay and Brian Schlick
SchlickArt - A Visual Marketing Company
661-313-3907 | [email protected]

1.k
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) March 10, 2025
Santa Clarita City Planning Commission
23920 Valencia Blvd
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Subject: Letter of Support for the Serrano Development Group Project Dear Santa Clarita City Planning Commission,
I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed-use development by Serrano Development Group. As a business owner and resident of Santa Clarita, I have seen firsthand how well-designed developments contribute to the vibrancy of our community, and I believe this project will be a tremendous asset to the Santa Clarita Valley.

Serrano Development Group has a proven track record of creating visually stunning, functional, and community-focused developments. Their projects enhance the character of our city and attract new businesses. This particular project, with its combination of residential living on the top four levels and commercial spaces on the ground level, is exactly the type of thoughtful urban planning that benefits our growing community.

One of the highlights of this development is the inclusion of the Horseshoe Bar on the ground level. The Horseshoe Bar has long been a cherished gathering place, bringing people together in a positive and lively environment. Its continued presence within this new development ensures that Santa Clarita retains a sense of familiarity and community while embracing growth and modernization.

This project not only meets the needs of residents by providing high-quality housing but also strengthens local commerce, drawing in both new businesses and visitors.

It promotes walkability, fosters a thriving local economy, and adds to the aesthetic appeal of the area. I firmly believe that approving this development would be a significant step forward for Santa Clarita’s future.

I urge the Planning Commission to support this project and allow Serrano Development Group to bring their vision to life in a way that benefits both current and future residents of our city. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Matthew Sutherland
Matrimony Films
818.262.5402
[email protected]
21774 Redwood Cyn Pl
Santa Clarita, CA 91390

1.k
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Rafael Gonzalez
Newhall Refinery
24258 Main st
Old Town Newhall, CA 91321
March 11, 2025
City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission
23920 Valencia Blvd.

Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission,
As a business owner in Old Town Newhall, I want to express my strong support for the proposed mixed-use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. This project represents an exciting opportunity to further establish Old Town Newhall as the premier entertainment and cultural destination within the City of Santa Clarita.

The continued growth and revitalization of Old Town Newhall are essential to attracting more visitors, increasing foot traffic, and supporting local businesses. The addition of new residential units and retail space will bring more activity to the area, creating a lively atmosphere that benefits restaurants, shops, and entertainment venues alike. More people living and spending time in the district means more economic success for the entire community.

Additionally, the inclusion of much-needed parking will improve accessibility and enhance the overall experience for visitors. As our district continues to grow, having convenient parking options will encourage more people to explore and enjoy everything Old Town Newhall has to offer.

With its thoughtful design that blends historic character with modern development, this project aligns perfectly with the vision of making Old Town Newhall a vibrant entertainment hub for Santa Clarita. More visitors, more businesses, and more opportunities for community engagement will help solidify our district as the go-to destination for dining, arts, and nightlife in the region.

I strongly encourage the approval of this project, as it will contribute to the long-term success of Old Town Newhall and further establish it as a thriving cultural and entertainment center for Santa Clarita.

Respectfully,
Rafael Gonzalez
Newhall Refinery
[email protected]

1.k
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) February 28, 2025
Dear City of Santa Clarita,
I am writing to express my strong support for the new mixed-use development in Newhall. As a longtime resident and local photographer, I have always been drawn to the charm and character of Old Town Newhall. The historic streets, unique storefronts, and vibrant community spaces make it one of my favorite places to capture the essence of Santa Clarita through my lens. I am excited to see this new development continue to support and enhance the culture and history that make Newhall so special.

Newhall has transformed in incredible ways over the years while staying true to its roots. The addition of Newhall Crossings has brought new life to the area, with locally owned shops, restaurants, and entertainment venues that celebrate our community’s creativity and entrepreneurial spirit. It’s become a place where artists, small business owners, and families gather—a place that tells the story of our city’s past while embracing its future.

What makes this new project so exciting is that it will build upon this momentum while maintaining the character that makes Newhall unique. With its Western Victorian design, this development will blend seamlessly with the historic aesthetic of Old Town Newhall, preserving the authenticity that so many of us cherish. The addition of new housing and retail space means more opportunities for residents and businesses to thrive, ensuring that Newhall continues to be a place where people want to live, work, and create.

As someone who has spent years capturing the beauty of this community, I am thrilled to see growth that respects the culture and history of Newhall while paving the way for new opportunities. For all these reasons, I fully support this development and encourage its approval. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best Regards,
Renee Bowen
Photographer, Life & Biz Coach
[email protected]

1.k
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) March 10, 2025
Dear City of Santa Clarita Building and Planning Commission, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed-use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for over 30 years, and it has been a wonderful place to raise my family and build lasting relationships within the community.

As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city’s prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community.

This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much-needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from.

Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I’ve seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in.

For these reasons, I fully support the mixed-use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Renee I. DeWolf
24262 Cross Street
Newhall, CA 91321

1.k
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Ruben Delgado
Newhall Refinery
24258 Main st
Old Town Newhall, CA 91321
March 11, 2025
City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission
23920 Valencia Blvd.

Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission,
As a business owner in Old Town Newhall, I want to express my strong support for the proposed mixed-use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. This project represents an exciting opportunity to further establish Old Town Newhall as the premier entertainment and cultural destination within the City of Santa Clarita.

The continued growth and revitalization of Old Town Newhall are essential to attracting more visitors, increasing foot traffic, and supporting local businesses. The addition of new residential units and retail space will bring more activity to the area, creating a lively atmosphere that benefits restaurants, shops, and entertainment venues alike. More people living and spending time in the district means more economic success for the entire community.

Additionally, the inclusion of much-needed parking will improve accessibility and enhance the overall experience for visitors. As our district continues to grow, having convenient parking options will encourage more people to explore and enjoy everything Old Town Newhall has to offer.

With its thoughtful design that blends historic character with modern development, this project aligns perfectly with the vision of making Old Town Newhall a vibrant entertainment hub for Santa Clarita. More visitors, more businesses, and more opportunities for community engagement will help solidify our district as the go-to destination for dining, arts, and nightlife in the region.

I strongly encourage the approval of this project, as it will contribute to the long-term success of Old Town Newhall and further establish it as a thriving cultural and entertainment center for Santa Clarita.

Respectfully,
Ruben Delgado
Newhall Refinery
[email protected]

1.k
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Thursday March 6, 2025
Santa Clarita City Council
23920 Valencia Blvd #120,
Valencia, CA 91355
Dear Santa Clarita Council Members,
I am writing to express my enthusiastic support for the upcoming mixed-use development project on Main Street in Newhall. As a young adult who grew up in Santa Clarita, I have always appreciated the charm of our city, but I’m especially excited to see Newhall continue to evolve into a lively and thriving destination.

Newhall Crossings was a game-changer for the area, bringing incredible restaurants and shops like Maginn’s Irish Pub that have made Main Street more vibrant and engaging. Seeing how that project transformed the neighborhood makes me even more excited about what this new development will bring. More housing options mean that people like me, who want to stay in Santa Clarita, will have better opportunities to find a place to live. The addition of 5,300 square feet of retail space will attract new businesses and entertainment options, making Newhall an even more exciting place to visit, shop, and hang out with friends.

It’s amazing to see our community embrace growth while still maintaining its unique character.

This project will help strengthen the local economy, create jobs, and give young professionals and families more reasons to stay and invest in the area.

I truly believe this development is a step in the right direction for Newhall, and I look forward to seeing the positive impact it will have. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Sydney Tow

1.k
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Tamara Moller
Newhall Refinery
Old Town Newhall, CA
March 11, 2025
City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission
23920 Valencia Blvd.

Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission,
As an employee in Old Town Newhall, I see every day how important it is to bring more people into our district to support local businesses. The proposed mixed-use development at Market St. and Main St. will do exactly that—attract more residents and visitors, increasing foot traffic and bringing more customers into the establishment where I work.

More people living and spending time in the area means more opportunities for businesses to grow and thrive. With additional retail space and improved parking, this project will make Old Town Newhall an even more inviting destination for dining, shopping, and entertainment.

I strongly support this development because it will help ensure the long-term success of businesses like the one I work for, while also making Old Town Newhall a more vibrant place for everyone to enjoy.

Sincerely,
Tamara Moller
Newhall Refinery

1.k
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

1.k
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) March 4, 2025
RE: Support for Proposed Mixed-Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321
Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff,
I am excited about the new proposed project in downtown Newhall and to offer my full support for the mixed-use development project on Main Street. As a resident of Santa Clarita for almost 30 years, I have seen firsthand how our city has grown evolved, and I believe this new development will play a crucial role in the next chapter of Newhall and in shaping its future.

Newhall has always been a central part of our community. With its rich history and charm, it serves as a cornerstone for Santa Clarita. That’s why it’s so important to invest in its growth. The addi�on of 78 new apartments will offer more housing for families, while the new retail space will inject vitality into our local economy, suppor�ng both new businesses and long-established ones.

The success of Newhall Crossings has already shown us the posi�ve impact that development can have. It’s drawn people back into the area, boosted business ac�vity, and transformed Old Town Newhall into a thriving hub. With more foot traffic, more residents will have greater access to restaurants, shops, and services—ul�mately benefi�ng everyone who calls Newhall home.

I would love to see and am excited to see this project move forward. I am confident that this project will bring con�nued prosperity and posi�ve growth to the neighborhood and ul�mately SCV as a whole. Thank you for considering my support.

Sincerely,
Cathy Craig
[email protected] / 310-710-3664

1.k
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Bre Johnson
Newhall Refinery
Old Town Newhall, CA
March 5, 2025
City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission
23920 Valencia Blvd.

Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission,
As an employee in Old Town Newhall, I see every day how important it is to bring more people into our district to support local businesses. The proposed mixed-use development at Market St. and Main St. will do exactly that—attract more residents and visitors, increasing foot traffic and bringing more customers into the establishment where I work.

More people living and spending time in the area means more opportunities for businesses to grow and thrive. With additional retail space and improved parking, this project will make Old Town Newhall an even more inviting destination for dining, shopping, and entertainment.

I strongly support this development because it will help ensure the long-term success of businesses like the one I work for, while also making Old Town Newhall a more vibrant place for everyone to enjoy.

Sincerely,
Bre Johnson
Newhall Refinery

1.k
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Michelina Payetta - Newhall Refinery
Old Town Newhall, CA
City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission
23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission,
As an employee in Old Town Newhall, I see every day how important it is to bring more people into our district to support local businesses. The proposed mixed-use development at Market St. and Main St. will do exactly that—attract more residents and visitors, increasing foot traffic and bringing more customers into the establishment where I work.

More people living and spending time in the area means more opportunities for businesses to grow and thrive. With additional retail space and improved parking, this project will make Old Town Newhall an even more inviting destination for dining, shopping, and entertainment.

I strongly support this development because it will help ensure the long-term success of businesses like the one I work for, while also making Old Town Newhall a more vibrant place for everyone to enjoy.

Sincerely,
Michelina Payetta - Newhall Refinery

1.k
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Comment Letters (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))