Agenda Item: 3
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
DEVELOPER FEES
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
PRESENTER: Patrick Sprengel
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Conduct a public hearing.
2. Adopt a resolution to adjust the Consolidated Fire Protection District developer fee from $1.6176 per square foot to $1.6710 per square foot in accordance with the Developer Fee Agreement between the City of Santa Clarita and the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County.
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City of Santa Clarita’s (City) agreement with Los Angeles County (County) to be part of the Consolidated Fire Protection District (Fire District), the City is required to adopt the attached updated Developer Fee Detailed Fire Station Plan within a reasonable period. The fee is typically updated annually. The last Fire District developer fee increase became effective May 14, 2024.
Fire District developer fees finance the construction of new (and replacement) fire stations and related fire protection improvements within the City.
The proposed fee increase from $1.6176 per square foot to $1.6710 per square foot is consistent with the fee increase adopted by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on February 25, 2025. The proposed fee adjustment is primarily a result of cumulative fire station development financing costs as well as increased fire apparatus and equipment costs. The Fire District developer fee is charged on new residential buildings, new detached residential accessory structures, new commercial buildings, and residential or commercial additions over 2,000 square 3 Packet Pg. 207
feet. The fee is collected at the time of building permit issuance.
The increased fee amount will ensure the City’s Fire District developer fees are consistent with the fees collected by the County in the unincorporated areas of the Santa Clarita Valley and will satisfy the City’s agreement with the County.
Staff recommends conducting a public hearing and adopting a resolution to adjust the Consolidated Fire Protection District developer fee, which, if approved, will go into effect July 1, 2025.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the City as a result of this resolution. There are minor administrative costs for collecting and transmitting Fire District developer fees to the County.
These costs will not be affected by the fee adjustment.
ATTACHMENTS
2025 Fire Fees Public Hearing Notice
Resolution 2025
Notification Letter to City Manager
Total Developer Fees Collected 2025
3 Packet Pg. 208
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A PROPOSED INCREASE IN
CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
A public hearing will be held before the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita to consider an increase to Consolidated Fire Protection District developer fees from $1.6176 to $1.6710 per square foot of new development in the Santa Clarita Valley Area of Benefit. The proposed fee adjustment is largely a result of cumulative fire station development financing costs, as well as increased fire apparatus and equipment costs. In accordance with the City of Santa Clarita’s agreement with the County of Los Angeles to be part of the Consolidated Fire Protection District, the City of Santa Clarita is required to adopt the updated Developer Fee Detailed Fire Station Plan within a reasonable period of time. The proposed fee adjustment is consistent with the fee increase adopted by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on February 25, 2025.
The public hearing will be held by the City Council in the City Hall Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, first floor, the 13
th day of May 2025, at 6:00 p.m.
If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Proponents, opponents, and any interested persons may be heard on this matter at this time.
Further information regarding the proposed fee increase may be obtained by visiting www.santaclarita.gov/building, or by contacting John Caprarelli, Building Official, at (661) 2554935.
Dated: May 1, 2025
Mary Cusick, MMC
City Clerk
Published: The Signal, April 29, 2025 and May 6, 2025
3.a
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: 2025 Fire Fees Public Hearing Notice (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES)
RESOLUTION NO. 25-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO DEVELOPER FEES
FOR FUNDING OF FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES
WHEREAS, on July 14, 1992, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita adopted Resolution No. 92-152, which established a finance plan to fund fire protection facilities in the benefit area designated as the Santa Clarita Valley as part of the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County; and
WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 92-15, which authorized the establishment of a fee to fund fire protection facilities.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California, does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Repeal all fees set forth by prior resolutions for the Consolidation Fire Protections District of Los Angeles County as originally established in Resolution No. 92-152.
SECTION 2. Establish said Consolidated Fire Protection District fee of $1.6710 per square foot of new development in the Santa Clarita Valley Area of Benefit, calculated as provided for in Resolution No. 92-152.
SECTION 3. Except as herein modified, Resolution No. 92-152 shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. This resolution shall go into full force and effect on July 1, 2025.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of ________ 2025. ______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY CLERK
DATE:__________________________
3.b
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Resolution 2025 (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25-__was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the __ day of ________ 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
CITY CLERK
3.b
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Resolution 2025 (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES) ANTHONY C. MARRONE
FIRE CHIEF
FORESTER & FIRE WARDEN
“Proud Protectors of Life,
the Environment, and Property”
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
FIRE DEPARTMENT
1320 NORTH EASTERN AVENUE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90063-3294
(323) 881-2401
www.fire.lacounty.gov
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
KATHRYN BARGER, CHAIR
FIFTH DISTRICT
HILDA L. SOLIS
FIRST DISTRICT
HOLLY J. MITCHELL
SECOND DISTRICT
LINDSEY P. HORVATH
THIRD DISTRICT
JANICE HAHN
FOURTH DISTRICT
SERVING THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND THE CITIES OF:
AGOURA HILLS
ARTESIA
AZUSA
BALDWIN PARK
BELL
BELL GARDENS
BELLFLOWER
BRADBURY
CALABASAS
CARSON
CERRITOS
CLAREMONT
COMMERCE
COVINA
CUDAHY
DIAMOND BAR
DUARTE
EL MONTE
GARDENA
GLENDORA
HAWAIIAN GARDENS
HAWTHORNE
HERMOSA BEACH
HIDDEN HILLS
HUNTINGTON PARK
INDUSTRY
INGLEWOOD
IRWINDALE
LA CANADA-FLINTRIDGE
LA HABRA
LA MIRADA
LA PUENTE
LAKEWOOD
LANCASTER
LAWNDALE
LOMITA
LYNWOOD
MALIBU
MAYWOOD
NORWALK
PALMDALE
PALOS VERDES ESTATES
PARAMOUNT
PICO RIVERA
POMONA
RANCHO PALOS VERDES
ROLLING HILLS
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES
ROSEMEAD
SAN DIMAS
SANTA CLARITA
SIGNAL HILL
SOUTH EL MONTE
SOUTH GATE
TEMPLE CITY
VERNON
WALNUT
WEST HOLLYWOOD
WESTLAKE VILLAGE
WHITTIER
March 13, 2025
Mr. Kenneth Striplin, City Manager
City of Santa Clarita
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Dear Mr. Striplin:
On February 25, 2025, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles (Board) adopted a resolution to update the County of Los Angeles developer fee program for the benefit of the Consolidated Fire Protection District (District). This resolution adopted the updated Developer Fee Detailed Fire Station Plan, the Developer Fee Funds 2023-24 Fiscal Year-End Report, and the Developer Fee rate increase to $1.6710 per square foot of new development in the Santa Clarita Valley Area of Benefit (Area 2). This updated rate will be effective May 1, 2025, in the unincorporated areas within Area 2.
Pursuant to the Developer Fee Agreement between the District and the City of Santa Clarita (City), the City shall adopt the updated Fire Station Plan and developer fee rate subsequent to the Board's adoption. When completed, please have a copy of your City-approved resolution sent to the District.
Enclosed for your records is a copy of the Board-adopted resolution. If you have any questions, you may contact me at (213) 466-5596, or via email at [email protected].
Very truly yours,
MARCIA VELASQUEZ, HEAD OF PLANNING AND EXECUTIVE SUPPORT
PLANNING AND GRANTS DIVISION
MV:mb
Enclosures
c: Assistant Fire Chief Patrick Sprengel
3.c
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES) ANTHONY C. MARRONE
FIRE CHIEF
FORESTER & FIRE WARDEN
“Proud Protectors of Life,
the Environment, and Property”
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
FIRE DEPARTMENT
1320 NORTH EASTERN AVENUE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90063-3294
(323)881-2401
www.fire.lacounty.gov
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
KATHRYN BARGER, CHAIR
FIFTH DISTRICT
HILDA L. SOLIS
FIRST DISTRICT
HOLLY J. MITCHELL
SECOND DISTRICT
LINDSEY P. HORVATH
THIRD DISTRICT
JANICE HAHN
FOURTH DISTRICT
SERVING THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND THE CITIES OF:
AGOURA HILLS
ARTESIA
AZUSA
BALDWIN PARK
BELL
BELL GARDENS
BELLFLOWER
BRADBURY
CALABASAS
CARSON
CERRITOS
CLAREMONT
COMMERCE
COVINA
CUDAHY
DIAMOND BAR
DUARTE
EL MONTE
GARDENA
GLENDORA
HAWAIIAN GARDENS
HAWTHORNE
HERMOSA BEACH
HIDDEN HILLS
HUNTINGTON PARK
INDUSTRY
INGLEWOOD
IRWINDALE
LA CANADA-FLINTRIDGE
LA HABRA
LA MIRADA
LA PUENTE
LAKEWOOD
LANCASTER
LAWNDALE
LOMITA
LYNWOOD
MALIBU
MAYWOOD
NORWALK
PALMDALE
PALOS VERDES ESTATES
PARAMOUNT
PICO RIVERA
POMONA
RANCHO PALOS VERDES
ROLLING HILLS
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES
ROSEMEAD
SAN DIMAS
SANTA CLARITA
SIGNAL HILL
SOUTH EL MONTE
SOUTH GATE
TEMPLE CITY
VERNON
WALNUT
WEST HOLLYWOOD
WESTLAKE VILLAGE
WHITTIER
February 25, 2025
The Honorable Board of Supervisors
County of Los Angeles
383 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
Dear Supervisors:
APPROVE AND ADOPT THE RESOLUTION
TO INCREASE THE DEVELOPER FEE FOR THE CONSOLIDATED
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
(3RD AND 5TH DISTRICTS) (3 VOTES)
SUBJECT
The Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (District) has completed its annual review of the Developer Fee Program (DFP) and is making recommendations to increase the DFP rates in the three Areas of Benefit and the City of Calabasas.
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR BOARD, AFTER A PUBLIC HEARING:
Acting as the governing body of the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County, is recommended that your Board:
1. Approve and adopt the enclosed Resolution and the 2024 DFP rate increase for the three Areas of Benefit, Area 1 (Malibu/Santa Monica Mountains/City of Calabasas):
$1.1851 (+$0.0095) per square foot; Area 2 (Santa Clarita Valley): $1.6710 (+$0.0534) per square foot; and Area 3 (Antelope Valley): $1.1407 (+$0.0127) per square foot.
2. Find that updating the DFP is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a)(4) in that it involves the collection of fees for capital projects necessary to maintain services within the Areas of Benefit. 3 February 25, 2025
3.c
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES) The Honorable Board of Supervisors
February 25, 2025
PURPOSE/JUSTIFICATION OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
On July 12, 1990, your Honorable Board adopted a resolution establishing a County of Los Angeles DFP for the District. The DFP was implemented August 1, 1990, to fund the acquisition, construction, improvement, and equipping of fire station facilities in the highgrowth, urban-expansion areas of the District. The purpose of this program, as adopted by the Board, is to ensure these additional resources are made available to protect the lives of residents and maintain efficient fire protection and life-safety services in the Areas of Benefit where population is increasing based on urban expansion. The Developer Fee rate increase enables the District to fully fund the development of new fire stations using a cost component that utilizes the California Consumer Price Index (CPI) due to the rate of inflation that impacts the costs of construction, land, and equipment. Pursuant to Government Codes 66001 and 66002, the resolution instructs the District to conduct annual evaluations of the DFP and make appropriate recommendations to your Honorable Board.
Additionally, on September 4, 2007, your Honorable Board adopted a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between the County of Los Angeles and the City of Calabasas wherein the parties agreed to exercise the power to levy the DFP in the City of Calabasas and the City Council authorized your Honorable Board to conduct all proceedings in connection with the levy of the fee, and any modifications of the fee amount, within the city boundaries.
IMPLEMENTATION OF STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Approval of the recommended actions is consistent with the County’s Strategic Plan North Star Focus Area Goal A, Strategies i: Customer Service: Support departmental efforts to improve customer service and to enhance efficiency and responsiveness to meet the needs of all residents.
FISCAL IMPACT/FINANCING
The District is funded independently from the County’s General Fund and relies primarily on property tax revenue to provide essential fire protection and emergency medical services.
The DFP provides an additional revenue source to fund essential fire station facilities and equipment in the areas of urban growth. Increasing the fee rates in the unincorporated areas of the three Areas of Benefit and the City of Calabasas will enable the District to fund the development of new fire stations proportionate to the need necessitated by growth.
The DFP generates approximately $3.8 million in revenue annually and subject to change based on variability in the construction of homes and land acquisition in the Areas of Benefit.
These funds are deposited into the District’s Developer Fee Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund and can only be used to fund the development of new fire stations within specific geographic areas.
There is no impact to net County cost.
3.c
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES) The Honorable Board of Supervisors
February 25, 2025
FACTS AND PROVISIONS/LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 66000, 66001, 66002, 66006, and 66018, the District has prepared three enclosures to the Resolution. Enclosure A, Developer Fee Detailed Fire Station Plan to the Resolution depicts the status of completed and proposed fire stations, and helispots, as well as, costs, and funding sources. Enclosure B, Developer Fee for the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County Developer Fee Funds 2023-24 Fiscal Year (FY)-End Report, identifies the beginning DFP Fund balance for FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25, including variances due to interest, advertisement, refunds, etc. Enclosure C, Developer Fee for the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County 2024 Developer Fee Calculation Summary, breaks down the cost and finance (Area 2) associated with the construction of a fire station, purchase of apparatus, and administration cost. These costs are necessary to finalize the new DFP rate for the respective Areas of Benefit.
County Counsel has approved as to form the attached Resolution updating the DFP.
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
This project is statutorily exempt per Section 15273 (a)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines developed by the State Office of Planning Research in that it involves the collection of fees for capital projects necessary to maintain services within existing service areas.
IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (OR PROJECTS)
The updated rates will be imposed in the unincorporated areas in the three DFP Areas of Benefit and the City of Calabasas effective May 1, 2025. As a result, the updated Developer Fee rates will be imposed in the cities of Malibu, Santa Clarita, and Lancaster upon adoption of a resolution updating the fee amounts by each respective city.
CONCLUSION
Upon conclusion of the public hearing and approval by your Honorable Board, please instruct the Executive Officer to return an adopted stamped copy of this letter with the adopted Resolution to the following office:
Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County Marcia Velasquez, Head of Planning and Executive Support 1320 N. Eastern Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90063
[email protected]
The District’s contact can be reached at (213) 466-5596.
3.c
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES) The Honorable Board of Supervisors
February 25, 2025
Respectfully submitted,
ANTHONY C. MARRONE, FIRE CHIEF
ACM:mb
Enclosures
c: Chief Executive Officer
County Counsel
Auditor-Controller
3.c
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES)
ENCLOSURE A
DEVELOPER FEE FOR THE CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DEVELOPER FEE DETAILED FIRE STATION PLAN
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
OCTOBER 2024
3.c
Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Fire Station/Location In most cases a site has not yet been acquired; the locations are therefore approximate.
Anticipated Capital ∙ Project Costs
∙ Apparatus cost includes the full cost of the apparatus as well as outfitting and equipment costs. ∙ No District overhead costs nor an inflation factor have been applied; all figures are based on current costs.∙ Project Cost Estimate
Amount Budgeted
Equipment and StaffingFiscal Year The Fiscal Year period begins July 1 and ends June 30.
Initiating Priority Year Refers to the fiscal year that the land acquisition or construction of the fire station is anticipated to begin.Target Occupancy Target occupancy is approximately one to two years from the actual start of construction Where actual costs are not yet available, the anticipated capital projects costs are based upon the District's current cost experienced for construction, land and equipment.Developer Fee credit may be granted for the conveyance of a site, apparatus, or construction of a fire station to help offset the impact of development on the District.
Based on average costs for fire stations recently completed and stations under development; includes plans, specifications, consultant services, plan check, permit and inspection fees, construction, project management, furnishings, and equipment.The amount budgeted could be from Developer Fee funds collected or advanced from District general revenues or certificates of participation. All advances made and/or interest incurred by the District to finance station development are to be repaid when Developer Fee revenues are sufficient. If no amount is budgeted, the development of the fire station may be delayed until Developer Fee revenues are sufficient to fund the site acquisition and/or construction of the fire station.This plan reflects the proposed staffing and equipment to be implemented when each station and the development served by each station are built out in the respective areas of benefit. In many instances, a transitional staffing confirguration will be utilized until build out occurs.
DEVELOPER FEE DETAILED FIRE STATION PLAN
This Developer Fee Detailed Fire Station Plan (Plan) reflects the Consolidated Fire Protection District's (District) fire service requirements as of October 2024 based upon growth projections and contacts with cities and developers who have shared their development plans with the District.The Plan identifies 6 completed fire stations, 18 proposed fire stations, 1 expansion station, 4 helispots, and the necessary capital equipment that will be required in the Areas of Benefit as well as the anticipated costs and time frames provided that development occurs as expected. The anticipated costs identified in the Plan will be funded by Developer Fee revenues or funds which the District has advanced from other sources. These advances will be repaid to the District when sufficient Developer Fee revenue is generated.
Terms Used in Plan Explanation
Fiscal Year 2024-25
PREFACE
3.c
Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STATIONS OPERATIONAL: REIMBURSEMENT PENDING & IN-PROGRESS* Station Size, Equip.
Facility Funding Source* and Staffing Comments
Fire Station 128 Station Development Costs 9,066,972 $ Commercial Paper 9,976 sq. ft. The site was conveyed to the District by Shappell Industries 28450 Whites Canyon Rd. **Principal Paid (945,000) Proceeds Engine for developer fee credit. Partial funding totalling $3.6 million was Santa Clarita (City) Balance 8,121,972 $ provided by the American Recovery and Reimbursement Act.
The fire station was completed and operational March 1, 2012.
Fire Station 132 Station Development Costs 8,127,873 $ Commercial Paper 9,746 sq. ft. The site was conveyed to the District by K. HovnanianWes Thompson Ranch **Principal Paid (1,515,000) Proceeds Engine (VTTM 49621). Apparatus for this permanent station was 29310 Sand Canyon. Rd. Balance 6,612,873 $ transferred from temporary Fire Station 132. The permanentSanta Clarita (City) station was completed and operational March 12, 2012.
Fire Station 143 Station Development Costs 7,913,986 $ Commercial Paper 9,700 sq. ft. The land was conveyed by the developer, Newhall Land and 28580 Hasley Canyon Rd Principal Paid (380,000) Proceeds Engine Farming, for developer fee credit. The fire station was completedSanta Clarita Valley Balance 7,533,986 $ and operational in November 2016. (Unincorporated)Fire Station 150 Station Development Costs 11,483,583 $ Commercial Paper 19,935 sq. ft. The site was conveyed to the District by Pardee Homes for 19190 Golden Valley Rd. Prinicipal Paid (2,360,000) Proceeds Haz. Mat. Task Force developer fee credit. A Hazardous Materials Task Force Santa Clarita (City) Balance 9,123,583 $ (Engine and Squad) assigned to Fire Station 76 was reassigned to staff this station.
BC/AC HQ The fire station was completed and operational Feb. 1, 2013.
Fire Station 156 Station Development Costs 7,512,226 $ Commercial Paper 11,152 sq. ft. The site was conveyed to the District from Newhall Land and24505 Copper Hill Drive Prinicipal Paid (1,395,000) Proceeds Engine Farming for developer fee credit. Apparatus was transferredRye Canyon Area Balance 6,117,226 $ from temporary Fire Station 156. The station was completed and Santa Clarita (City) operational in 2011.
Fire Station 104 $ $234,000 11,450 sq. ft. 13,247,645 This station replaces temporary Fire Station 104. The land was 26901 Golden Valley Road Principal Paid $ 100% Commercial (315,000) Engine purchased by the District in Dec. 2010 and the station was completed (at Soledad Canyon) 1,191,053 Paper Proceeds in 2020.Santa Clarita (City) Total 14,123,698 $ Project cost est.
Apparatus
DEVELOPER FEE DETAILED FIRE STATION PLAN
Capital Project Costs
Fiscal Year 2024-25
*The District is financing costs that exceed the developer fee funds available within Area 2. The District will be reimbursed the costs it advanced, including interest and, administrativecharges from Area 2 as revenues are collected and from the City of Santa Clarita for the City's proportionate share of fire station facilities financing.**Based on Bond Debt Service provided by Financial Management Division, cumulative principal cost.
3.c
Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT EXPANSION FACILITY:
Station Size (Sq. Ft.)
Facility and Equipment
Fire Station 33 Expansion Land $ - This Fire Station will be removed from future Station Plans. 44947 Date Ave. Project cost est. $ -Lancaster Apparatus $ - (Unincorporated)
Total $ -
LAND ACQUISITION ONLY:
Station Size (Sq. Ft.)
Facility and Equipment
Fire Station O (formerly 138) Land $ 361,548 10,000 The City of Palmdale expressed interest in assisting with site acquisition. The Avenue S and Tierra Subida Project cost est.* $ 10,358,600 District will pursue City participation, however, fire station development will not (Unincorporated Palmdale Area) Total $ 10,720,148 commence until development in the area warrants additional coverage.
Fire Station P (formerly 195) Land $ 361,548 10,000 The City of Palmdale expressed interest in assisting with site acquisition. In addition, Pearblossom Hwy/47th St. E. Project cost est.* $ 10,358,600 there is a proposed development project within this location for which the Fire District (Unincorporated Palmdale Area) may negotiate a station site. Fire station development will not commence until Total $ 10,720,148 development in the area warrants additional coverage.
Capital Project Costs Comments/Status
Early land acquisition will ensure that the future fire stations will be optimally placed when these areas develop in the future. The progress of development in these areas will be monitored for timing of the future construction of these stations:
DEVELOPER FEE DETAILED FIRE STATION PLAN
Capital Project Costs
AnticipatedAnticipated
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Comments/Status
3.c
Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
PROPOSED FIRE STATIONS
Station Size (Sq. Ft.)
Facility and Equipment Comments/Status
Fire Station 46 (formerly 177) Land - 13,500 Newhall Land to construct and equip according to an MOU for the Newhall Ranch Project cost est.* 13,984,110 Engine (2) Newhall Ranch Specific Plan area. This station will be located in the Santa Clarita Valley (Unincorporated) Apparatus 3,146,474 Squad Mission Village. Newhall will also construct a smaller auxiliary building Total $ 17,130,584 on the same site of the Fire Station. (Tract No. 61105) Fire Station 113 (formerly 175) Land $ - 9,800 Newhall Land to construct and equip according to an MOU for the Newhall Ranch Project cost est.* 10,151,428 Engine Newhall Ranch Specific Plan area. This station will be located in the Santa Clarita Valley (Unincorporated) Apparatus 1,805,445 Squad Landmark Village. (Tract No. 53108) Total $ 11,956,873
Fire Station 109 (formerly 176) Land - $ 9,800 Newhall Land to construct and equip according to an MOU for the Newhall Ranch Project cost est.* 10,151,428 Engine Newhall Ranch Specific Plan area. This station will be located in Santa Clarita Valley (Unincorporated) Apparatus 1,341,029 Portrero/Homestead. (Tract No. 60678) Total $ 11,492,457
Fire Station A (formerly 179) Land $ - 10,000 The fire station site was reevaluated and is no longer required. This fire station will Lyons Ranch Project cost est.* 10,358,600 Engine be removed from future Station Plans.
Santa Clarita Valley (Unincorporated) Apparatus 1,341,029 Total $ 11,699,629
Fire Station B (formerly 109) Land $ 361,548 10,000 Fire station development will not begin until development in the area warrants Fox Field - vicinity of 40th St. W Station Dev. Costs* 10,358,600 Engine additional coverage. and Avenue G Apparatus 1,341,029
City of Lancaster (City) Total 12,061,177 $
Fire Station C (formerly 113) Land $ - 10,000 The developer is to provide a site within the Avanti South Project area to Avanti South Project Station Dev. Costs* 10,358,600 Engine the District for developer fee credits. (Tract No. 74312)70th Street West and Ave. K-8 Apparatus 1,341,029 City of Lancaster (City) Total 11,699,629 $
Fire Station D (formerly 133) Land $ 4,190,456 10,000 Agreement with developer, City of Santa Clarita for the site executed on Needham Ranch Parkwy Project cost est.* 10,858,600 ** Engine 9/9/2019. The site was conveyed to District by Needham Ranch for near Eternal Valley Mem. Park Apparatus 1,341,029 developer fee credit. (Tract No. 50283) Santa Clarita (City) Total 16,390,085 $ (Helispot) Helispot is completed and station construction will commence when significant development in the vicinity occurs.
Capital Project Costs
DEVELOPER FEE DETAILED FIRE STATION PLAN
Anticipated
Fiscal Year 2024-25
*Based on an average cost per square foot of $1,035.86.**Additional $500,000 added for cost of helispot preparation costs. ***Cost will be updated once project start date has been established.
3.c
Packet Pg. 221
Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
PROPOSED FIRE STATIONS
Station Size (Sq. Ft.)
Facility Capital Project Costs and Equipment Comments/Status
DEVELOPER FEE DETAILED FIRE STATION PLAN
Anticipated
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Fire Station E (formerly 600) Land $ - 10,000 The developer, Pardee Homes, is to convey a station site to the Valley Cyn. Road at Spring Canyon Project cost est.* 10,358,600 Engine District for developer fee credits (Tract No. 48086) Santa Clarita Valley (Unincorporated) Apparatus 1,341,029 Total $ 11,699,629
Fire Station F (formerly 174) Land $ 361,548 4,982 Fire station development will not begin until development in the area warrants Neenach Fire Station Project cost est.* 5,160,655 Engine additional coverage.
Antelope Valley (Unincorporated) Apparatus 1,341,029
Total $ 6,863,232
Fire Station G (formerly 142) Fire Station $ 1,365,288 10,000 Fire station development will not begin until development in the area warrantsSierra Highway/Clanfield Project cost est.* 10,858,600 ** Engine additional coverage.
Antelope Valley (Unincorporated) Apparatus 1,341,029 (Helispot) Total $ 13,564,917 Fire Station H (formerly 139) Land $ *** - 10,000 Per the developer agreement for the Anaverde/City Ranch Project, the Anaverde/City Ranch Project cost est. - *** Engine developer is required to provide land and construct a permanent firePalmdale (City) Apparatus 1,341,029 station to be conveyed to the District.
Total 1,341,029 $
Fire Station I (formerly 190) Land $ *** - 10,000 Under a 1992 developer agreement for the Ritter Ranch Project, the Ritter Ranch Project cost est. - *** Engine developer is required to provide land and construct a permanent firePalmdale (City) Apparatus 1,341,029 station to be conveyed to the District.
Total 1,341,029 $
Fire Station J (formerly Northlake/180) Land $ 1,306,800 10,000 Developer to construct the proposed project R2018-00408-(5) with a future North of Lake Hughes, East of I-5, West Project cost est.* 10,358,600 Engine fire station to be built as part of Phase 2 in future. FS is expected to have a of Castaic Lake Apparatus 1,341,029 1.4 acre pad. (Tract No. 73336) Castaic Canyon (Unincorporated) Total $ 13,006,429
*Based on an average cost per square foot of $1,035.86.**Additional $500,000 added for cost of helispot preparation costs.***Cost will be updated once project start date has been established.
3.c
Packet Pg. 222
Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
PROPOSED FIRE STATIONS
Station Size (Sq. Ft.)
Facility Capital Project Costs and Equipment Comments/Status
DEVELOPER FEE DETAILED FIRE STATION PLAN
Anticipated
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Centennial Fire Station K Land - $ *** 13,000 Developer to enter into a Development Impact Mitigation Agreement withCentennial Project Project cost est. - *** Engine the District to construct and equip up to four fire stations, as Gorman (City) Apparatus 1,341,029 determined by the District, to serve the Centennial Development Total 1,341,029 $ Project.
Centennial Fire Station L Land - $ *** 10,000 Developer to enter into a Development Impact Mitigation Agreement with Centennial Project Project cost est. - *** Engine the District to construct and equip up to four fire stations, as Gorman (City) Apparatus 1,341,029 determined by the District, to serve the Centennial Development Total 1,341,029 $ Project.
Centennial Fire Station M Land - $ *** 10,000 Developer to enter into a Development Impact Mitigation Agreement with Centennial Project Project cost est. - *** Engine the District to construct and equip up to four fire stations, as Gorman (City) Apparatus 1,341,029 determined by the District, to serve the Centennial Development Total 1,341,029 $ Project.
Centennial Fire Station N Land - $ *** 10,000 Developer to enter into a Development Impact Mitigation Agreement with Centennial Project Project cost est. - *** Engine the District to construct and equip up to four fire stations, as Gorman (City) Apparatus 1,341,029 determined by the District, to serve the Centennial Development Total $ 1,341,029 Project.
Fire Station TBD Land $ 1,306,800 10,000 Development in this area is limited at this time and construction East Calabasas area between Project cost est.* 10,358,600 Engine will not commence until substantial development occurs. Stations 68 and 69 Apparatus 1,341,029 Total $ 13,006,429
Fing\Developer Fee\2023-24 Update\2023 Five Year Plan Update.xls *Based on an average cost per square foot of $1,035.86.**Additional $500,000 added for cost of helispot preparation costs.***Cost will be updated once project start date has been established.
3.c
Packet Pg. 223
Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT HELISPOTS:
Station Size (Sq. Ft.)
Facility and Equipment Comments/Status
Completed HelispotFire Station D (formerly 133) Land $ 4,190,456 10,000 Agreement with developer, City of Santa Clarita for the site executed on Needham Ranch Parkwy Project cost est.* 10,868,600 ** Engine 9/9/2019. The site was conveyed to District by Needham Ranch for near Eternal Valley Mem. Park Apparatus 1,341,029 developer fee credit. (Tract No. 50283) Santa Clarita (City) Total 16,400,085 $
Helispot is completed and station construction delayed until development in the area warrants additional coverage needed.
Proposed HelispotFire Station G (formerly 142) Land $ 1,365,288 10,000 The land was acquired by the District in July 2010. A Sierra Highway/Clanfield Project cost est.* 10,868,600 ** Engine helispot is planned to be constructed at this station site.
Antelope Valley (Unincorporated) Apparatus 1,341,029
Total 13,574,917 $
Val Verde Land - $ The District has requested that a helispot be provided within the Santa Clarita Valley (Unincorporated) Helispot 590,000 Val Verde Development Project. (Tract No. 60665) Apparatus
Total $ 590,000
Tesoro Land $ - The District has requested that a helispot be provided within the Santa Clarita Valley (Unincorporated) Helispot 590,000 Tesoro Del Valle Development Project. (Tract No. 51644) Apparatus
Total 590,000 $
*Based on an average cost per square foot of $1,035.86.**Additional $500,000 added for cost of helispot preparation costs.
DEVELOPER FEE DETAILED FIRE STATION PLAN
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Anticipated
Capital Project Costs
3.c
Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
ENCLOSURE B
Area of Benefit 1 Area of Benefit 2 Area of Benefit 3
Malibu/Santa Monica Mtns. (a) Santa Clarita Valley (b) Antelope Valley (c) City of Calabasas
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Beginning Balance $5,550,551.26 $14,312,453.27 $32,910,933.48 Total Developer Fee Revenue Collected (d) 448,450.16 9,971,482.48 1,760,912.69 Interest Earned 203,104.45 683,827.33 1,199,519.04
Adjustment (3,642.05) (2,325,112.50) (h) -
Fund Expenditures (Advertisement) (46.77) (46.77) (46.77) NSF Checks - - -
Refunds - - -
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Ending Balance $6,198,417.05 (e) $22,642,603.81 (f) $35,871,318.44 (g) (a) Includes unincorporated areas within Area of Benefit 1 and the Cities of Calabasas and Malibu. (b) Includes unincorporated areas within Area of Benefit 2 and the City of Santa Clarita. (c) Includes unincorporated areas within Area of Benefit 3 and the City of Lancaster. (d) The developer fee rates during FY 2023-24 were as follows:
Area 1 = 1.1756
Area 2 = 1.6176
Area 3 = 1.1280
(h) Adjustment includes two (2) Type I pumpers and one (1) paramedic squad. (g) Funds to be used for land acquisition for Fire Stations 138 and 195 in the unincorporated Palmdale area, and and financing of fire stations 128, 132, 143, 150, and 156. construction of additional stations as detailed in the 2024 Fire Station Plan update.
DEVELOPER FEE FOR THE CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DEVELOPER FEE FUNDS
2023-24 FISCAL YEAR-END REPORT
(e) Funds to be used to develop a fire station in the East Calabasas area when development in the area warrants additional coverage needed. (f) Funds used to fund the construction of permanent Fire Station 104 and to reimburse the District for the costs incurred in the development
3.c
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
ENCLOSURE C
Proportionate Proportionate Proportionate
Developer Fee 2024 Fire Station 2024 Cost 2024 Fire Station 2024 Cost 2024 Fire Station 2024 Cost Cost Component Cost Share Applied Cost Share Applied Cost Share Applied Average Land Cost $ 1,306,800 100.00% $ 1,306,800 $ 1,646,568 100.00% $ 1,646,568 $ 361,548 100.00% $ 361,548 Station Development Costs $ 10,358,600 100.00% $ 10,358,600 $ 10,726,331 100.00% $ 10,726,331 $ 10,726,331 100.00% $ 10,726,331 Financing Costs N/A - - $ 23,810,495 20.00% $ 4,762,099 N/A - - Engine Cost $ 1,341,029 100.00% $ 1,341,029 $ 1,341,029 100.00% $ 1,341,029 $ 1,341,029 100.00% $ 1,341,029 Quint Cost $ 2,509,465 20.95% $ 525,733 $ 2,509,465 20.95% $ 525,733 $ 2,509,465 20.95% $ 525,733 Squad Cost $ 464,416 32.80% $ 152,328 $ 464,416 32.80% $ 152,328 $ 464,416 32.80% $ 152,328 Total Cost Per Station $ 13,684,490 Total Cost Per Station $ 19,154,088 Total Cost Per Station $ 13,106,969 Administrative Costs $ 102,395 Administrative Costs $ 285,369 Administrative Costs $ 163,392 Total Area 1 Costs $ 13,786,885 Total Area 2 Costs $ 19,439,457 Total Area 3 Costs $ 13,270,361 Total Square Feet of Total Square Feet of Total Square Feet of Development per Station 11,633,307 Development per Station 11,633,307 Development per Station 11,633,307 Developer Fee Amount Developer Fee Amount Developer Fee Amount Per Square Foot $ 1.1851 Per Square Foot $ 1.6710 Per Square Foot $ 1.1407 Note: The calculated costs for the apparatus listed above (Engine, Quint, Squad) are inclusive of the base unit purchase price plus outfitting, equipment, and communications costs.
CITY OF CALABASAS
MALIBU/SANTA MONICA MTNS., SANTA CLARITA VALLEY ANTELOPE VALLEY
DEVELOPER FEE FOR THE CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2024 DEVELOPER FEE CALCULATION SUMMARY
AREA OF BENEFIT 1 - AREA OF BENEFIT 2 - AREA OF BENEFIT 3 -
3.c
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO UPDATE THE
DEVELOPER FEE PROGRAM FOR THE BENEFIT OF
THE CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND TO CONSIDER THE DEVELOPER FEE FUNDS 2023-24 FISCAL YEAR-END REPORT
WHEREAS, on July 12, 1990, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles approved and adopted a County of Los Angeles Developer Fee Program (DFP) for the benefit of the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (District) in Area of Benefit 1, Malibu/Santa Monica Mountains, Area of Benefit 2, Santa Clarita Valley, and Area of Benefit 3, Antelope Valley (collectively, "Areas of Benefit") effective August 1, 1990, which DFP is to be updated annually thereafter; and WHEREAS, on September 4, 2007, the City of Calabasas, located in the Malibu/Santa Monica Mountains Area of Benefit, and the City Council of the City of Calabasas entered into a Joint Powers Agreement with the County of Los Angeles in which the City and County jointly agreed to exercise the power to levy the DFP in the City and to authorize the Board of Supervisors to conduct all proceedings in connection with the levy of fees and modifications of the fee amount within the City; and WHEREAS, the District desires to update the DFP rate in the three Areas of Benefit, in accordance with Government Code Section 66002; and WHEREAS, the rate increase is due to proposed developments in areas which are designated in the Los Angeles County General Plan as high-growth areas and require fire protection resources.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Supervisors, as the governing body of the District, resolves, finds, and determines that:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2. The DFP is for the purpose of generating funds for capital projects necessary to maintain fire protection services within the existing service areas of the District, and is statutorily exempt per Section 15273(a)(4) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines developed by the State Office of Planning and Research.
3. On February 25, 2025, a public hearing was held to update and consider:
Attachment A, the Developer Fee Detailed Fire Station Plan dated October 2024 attached hereto and incorporated herein, which serves as the DFP capital improvement plan and describes the acquisition, construction, installation, and equipping of fire stations to be funded with developer fee revenue; Attachment B, Developer Fee for the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County Developer Fee Funds 2023-24 Fiscal Year-End Report; and Attachment C, Developer Fee for the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County 2024 Developer Fee Calculation Summary attached hereto and incorporated herein, which imposes a separate fee calculation for each Area of Benefit based upon the actual fire station development costs experienced in each of the three areas;
3.c
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES)
4. The Board of Supervisors, as the governing body of the District, approves and adopts the updated DFP in the Areas of Benefit of the District as follows:
a. The updated DFP Detailed Fire Station Plan dated October 2024 is approved.
b. The DFP Funds 2023-24 Fiscal Year-End Report is approved. c. The updated DFP rates per square foot of new developments of $1.1851 in Area of Benefit 1 and the City of Calabasas, $1.6710 in Area of Benefit 2, and $1.1407 in Area of Benefit 3 are approved and shall become effective in the unincorporated areas within Areas of Benefit and the City of Calabasas on May 1, 2025.
d. The 2024 DFP Calculation Summary is approved.
e. All other terms and provisions of the DFP as previously adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
The foregoing resolution was adopted on the ________ day of _____________, 20__, by the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.
EDWARD YEN, Executive Officer
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By __________________________
Deputy
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DAWYN HARRISON, COUNTY COUNSEL
By ________________________________
Senior Deputy County Counsel
f\Planning\developer fee\2023-24 Update\2023 Developer Fee update Resolution Jenny Tam
Digitally signed by Jenny
Tam
Date: 2025.02.19
08:42:39 -08'00'
25th February 25
3.c
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Notification Letter to City Manager (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES)
TOTAL CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
DEVELOPER FEES
COLLECTED SINCE LAST ADJUSTMENT
The last adjustment to the Consolidated Fire Protection District developer fee occurred on May 1, 2025. The fee implemented on that date was $1.6710 per square foot of floor area of new buildings. The following fees were collected during the noted fiscal years:
Fiscal Year 2018-19 - $2,813,513
Fiscal Year 2019-20 - $1,389,163
Fiscal Year 2020-21 - $2,628,813
Fiscal Year 2021-22 - $1,163,527
Fiscal Year 2022-23 - $1,367,714
Fiscal Year 2023-24 - $3,359,128
Fiscal Year 2024-25 - $3,755,496
The Consolidated Fire Protection District developer fee is charged on new residential buildings, new detached residential accessory structures, new commercial buildings, and new commercial additions over 2,000 square feet at the time the building permit is issued.
3.d
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Total Developer Fees Collected 2025 (ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES)
Agenda Item: 4
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: METROWALK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (MASTER CASE 24-230)
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
PRESENTER: Erika Iverson
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council continue the item to their regularly scheduled meeting for May 27, 2025.
BACKGROUND
The applicant, BluMax Santa Clarita, LLC, is requesting amendments to the MetroWalk Specific Plan. On April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing regarding proposed amendments and the item was subsequently noticed for the City Council meeting on May 13, 2025. Staff is recommending this item be continued to May 27, 2025.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this recommended action. 4 Packet Pg. 230
Agenda Item: 5
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
NEW BUSINESS
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: FIRST RESPONDER TRIBUTE PROJECT
DEPARTMENT: Economic Development
PRESENTER: Phil Lantis
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council review and discuss the proposed concept for the First Responder Tribute Project, and provide direction to staff.
BACKGROUND
This item was moved from the meeting held on April 22, 2025, by a vote of the City Council.
At the regular City Council meeting on January 28, 2025, City of Santa Clarita (City) staff was directed to explore the development of a sculpture-based project honoring Santa Clarita's first responders for the sacrifices they have made in service to the community. As a result, City staff has developed a concept for a first responder tribute that would serve as a meaningful recognition of local heroes. This item outlines a proposed concept, site location, budget, and seeks the City Council's direction on the proposed First Responder Tribute Project (Project).
The proposed concept features life-size bronze sculptures of first responders, which may include firefighters, law enforcement, medical personnel, or other responders (see Attachment A). Each figure would be customized to reflect local uniforms, equipment, and other distinguishing features. The sculptures would be mounted on a raised cement platform and would include a descriptive plaque honoring Santa Clarita’s first responders, past, present, and future.
Staff recommends the George A. Caravalho Santa Clarita Sports Complex (Sports Complex) (see Attachment B), as the preferred site for the Project. Specifically, the tribute would be located across from the Skate Park, below the stairs leading to the second level of the park (see Attachment C). The site is visible from multiple directions and benefits from the high foot traffic generated by the surrounding amenities. As one of the City's designated regional parks, the Sports Complex serves as a central location for recreation, community events, and public gatherings, attracting a high volume of daily visitors. This location would allow both residents 5 Packet Pg. 231
and visitors to engage with the tribute, fostering community pride and appreciation for the individuals who serve and protect the Santa Clarita community.
The fabrication and delivery timeline for each bronze sculpture is estimated at 12 to 14 months, with costs ranging from $50,000 to $60,000 per sculpture. Installation work can be completed inhouse by City staff, reducing the overall project costs. Funding in the amount of $124,936 has been identified from the Rink Sports Pavilion Civic Art Project, A3004602. This amount would cover the cost of two sculptures within the Project.
If the City Council wishes to proceed with the Project and include more than two sculptures, additional funds will need to be appropriated to support the expanded scope from City Council Contingency. As part of this item, the City Council may also authorize the City Manager to execute the purchase of the sculptures in an amount not to exceed the total budget allocated for the Project.
At this time staff is seeking 1) direction on the proposed sculptures; 2) approval of recommended site or alternative site location; 3) appropriation of funds based on final City Council project approval; and 4) authorization by the City Council for the City Manager to execute all agreements for the purchase of the Project.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds in the amount of $124,936 are available in expenditure account A3004602-516101 (The Rink Sports Pavilion Civic Art Project). Additional funds are available in the City Council Contingency account.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: First Responder Representatives
Attachment B: First Responder Proposed Location
Attachment C: First Responder Site with Statues
5 Packet Pg. 232
FIRST RESPONDER TRIBUTE PROJECT REPRESENTATIVES
Firefighter
Law Enforcement
Attachment A 5.a
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Attachment A: First Responder Representatives (FIRST RESPONDER TRIBUTE PROJECT) EMT
NURSE
5.a
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Attachment A: First Responder Representatives (FIRST RESPONDER TRIBUTE PROJECT)
FIRST RESPONDER TRIBUTE PROJECT
Proposed Location
Santa Clarita Sports Complex
20870 Centre Pointe Parkway
Attachment B
5.b
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Attachment B: First Responder Proposed Location (FIRST RESPONDER TRIBUTE PROJECT) Attachment C 5.c
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Attachment C: First Responder Site with Statues (FIRST RESPONDER TRIBUTE PROJECT)
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
City Council
Special Meeting
~Minutes~
Tuesday, April 22, 2025 5:30 PM City Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Miranda called to order the Special meeting of the City Council at 5:32 p.m.
ROLL CALL
All Councilmembers were present.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION FOR AGENDIZED ITEMS
Addressing the City Council was Douglas (no last name provided).
CLOSED SESSION
Joseph Montes, City Attorney, advised of the need to conduct a Closed Session for the purpose of holding a:
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Government Code Section 54956.8
Property Location: Sierra Highway & Remsen Street
Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 2827-009-008 and 2827-010-007, 008, 009, 011, 012, 013 and 2827-030-001 and 2827-032-001, 002
Negotiating Parties: Forum Engineering and Construction and the City of Santa Clarita City’s Authorized Negotiator: City Manager
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION - TO BE HELD IN THE CARL BOYER ROOM Mayor Miranda recessed the meeting to Closed Session at 5:34 p.m.
RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
Mayor Miranda reconvened the meeting to Open Session at 6:15 p.m.
CITY ATTORNEY ANNOUNCEMENT
City Attorney Joseph Montes announced that no action was taken in Closed Session that was required to be reported.
6 Packet Pg. 237 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 5:30 PM (Consent Calendar)
ADJOURN
Mayor Miranda adjourned the Special Meeting at 6:15 p.m. ______________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________
CITY CLERK
6 Packet Pg. 238 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 5:30 PM (Consent Calendar)
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
City Council
Regular Meeting
Joint Meeting with
Board of Library Trustees
Hereinafter the titles Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, Councilmember, City Manager, City Attorney, and City Clerk may be used also to indicate Mayor/Chair/President, Mayor Pro Tem/Vice-Chair/Vice President, City Manager/Executive Director, City Attorney/Counsel, and City Clerk/Secretary ~Minutes~
Tuesday, April 22, 2025 6:00 PM City Council Chambers
INVOCATION
Mayor Miranda delivered the invocation.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Miranda called to order the Joint Regular meeting of the City Council and Board of Library Trustees at 6:17 p.m.
ROLL CALL
All Councilmembers were present.
FLAG SALUTE
Councilmember Ayala led the flag salute.
EXECUTIVE MEETING
This time has been set aside for Councilmembers to review the agenda and obtain any further information that may be needed. Council will also discuss each individual item during the course of the meeting with the exception of the Consent Calendar, which may be approved in its entirety by one motion, unless there is a request to pull an item for discussion. No action will be taken on public agenda items during the Executive Meeting.
AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS
Mayor Miranda announced that the City proclaims the week of April 20 through the 26 as National Volunteer Week and invited the City’s volunteer team to the dais to accept the proclamation, as well as the President’s Volunteer Service Award recipients to take a photo.
Councilmember Gibbs recognized Girl Scout Troop 1912 for their achievement in earning the prestigious Gold President’s Volunteer Service Award and invited Girl Scouts Airi Mejia and Harper Woodworth to the dais to accept their recognitions and to take a photo. 7 Packet Pg. 239 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)
Mayor Miranda recognized the Community Court Volunteers and invited those present, as well as City staff, to the dais to accept their recognitions.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Mayor Pro Tem Weste addressed Agenda Item #1, sharing that out of an abundance of caution, she would not participate in the public hearing.
Addressing the City Council was Alan Ferdman regarding conflict of interest; Betsy Thatt thanking the City Council for their support to the Jewish community; Diane Zimmerman regarding lithium battery storage facilities; Nancy (no last name provided) regarding noise pollution; Tony Maldonado regarding lithium battery storage facilities; Spitfire Streets regarding a junkyard in Canyon Country; and Dr. Abruhan regarding a shooting at a short-term rental home in Santa Clarita.
STAFF COMMENTS
City Manager Ken Striplin commented that subsequent to the shooting, the City sent notices of violation to the property owner and letters to the property rental businesses where the property is listed. Mr. Striplin remarked that that property owner will be responsible for all associated costs to the Sheriff’s Department, further mentioning that City staff would reach out to Dr. Abruhan, gather more information, and address the concerns regarding the property. Mr. Striplin clarified that Los Angeles County authorized the junkyard off State Route 14 (SR-14).
Councilwoman McLean inquired who the responsibility would fall under for an evacuation plan within the vicinity of a lithium battery storage facility, and Mr. Striplin responded that City staff had met with the Fire Department and determined that based on the Fire Department’s training and understanding of the facility, there is no anticipated need for a specific evacuation plan due to the structure of the battery storage facility.
Councilwoman McLean, along with Councilmember Ayala and Mayor Pro Tem Weste, expressed concerns regarding the absence of an evacuation plan. Councilwoman McLean requested that staff help facilitate with the Fire Department a public education event with the residents of the surrounding community; Councilmember Ayala recommended that staff create and investigate an emergency plan; and Mayor Pro Tem Weste commented that residents could benefit from a Fire Department emergency plan.
COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
Councilmember Ayala commented on the organizations she had been working with and remarked on meeting with the Fire Department as well as attending City events including Arbor Day, Fostering Youth Independence, the Census Block Party, Cowboy Festival, Splash N' Dash, and the Neighborhood Clean-up.
Mayor Miranda remarked on the City Council attending the Arbor Day celebration held on April 19 at the Santa Clarita Sports Complex and thanked all those in attendance for honoring Arbor Day. He also spoke on honoring photographer Ken Lubas, a Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer 7 Packet Pg. 240 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)
at the 29th Annual Santa Clarita Cowboy Festival, and remarked on Mr. Lubas' donation of a collage of photographs depicting the City.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM 1
NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)
Public Hearing regarding a request for a new five-story mixed-use building with 78 units and approximately 5,200 square-feet of commercial on the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council:
1. Conduct the public hearing.
2. Determine that the project is exempt from additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act as the project was contemplated and will comply with all mitigation measures established under the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
3. Adopt a resolution approving Master Case 24-134 (Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012) for the construction of a new five-story, mixed-use building and demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A).
Mayor Pro Tem Weste read aloud a statement regarding her decision to not participate in the proceedings involving Agenda Item #1. Mayor Pro Tem Weste recused herself, left the dais for the duration of this item, and returned at 10:40 p.m. for the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Mayor Miranda opened the Public Hearing.
Senior Planner Erika Iverson provided the staff presentation and stated that all notices required by law have been provided.
Jason Tolleson representing Serrano Development Group provided the applicant presentation.
Addressing the City Council in support were R.L Younkin, investor on Main Street, regarding economic impact on Old Town Newhall (OTN); Lindsey Schlick, Chamber board member and small business owner, regarding economic revitalization of OTN; Laurie Randall regarding economic progress for OTN; Dean Cox regarding letter of intent for The Rafters Group to relocate; Joelle Danahy, board member of Old Town Newhall Association, regarding parking in OTN; Robert Younkin regarding lack of community involvement in OTN; Michael Miller regarding the need for investment in OTN; Josh Pitts, owner of The Break Room in OTN, regarding the need for community growth in OTN; Jeff Paul, representing Newhall Crossing, 7 Packet Pg. 241 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar) regarding the need for development in OTN; Ben Jarvis regarding the need for development in OTN; Jordan Pereyra, representing Hart and Main, regarding business challenges during the workweek; David Rendall, Broker/Owner of RE/MAX Santa Clarita Valencia Gateway, regarding the struggles businesses face in OTN; Travis Teel regarding the struggles businesses face in OTN; Kim McBride, representing Hart and Main, regarding the struggles businesses face in OTN; and Ashe Mahoney regarding economic opportunity for OTN.
Addressing the City Council in opposition were Mark Hershey regarding parking concerns; Jeri Seratti regarding environmental impacts on KHTS; Alan Ferdman regarding preservation of OTN; Jade Aubuchon reading a letter from Brad Keeler, an acoustic professional unable to attend; Cindy Josten regarding her concerns for KHTS; TimBen Boydston, representing the Canyon Theatre Guild, regarding concerns with the development’s plans; Diane Zimmerman regarding concerns about overspending; Felicia Grady regarding parking concerns in OTN; Nancy (no last name provided) regarding construction noise; Ted Tobin, board member of the Canyon Theater Guild, regarding parking concerns in OTN; Spitfire Streets regarding concerns about urbanization; Ingrid Boydston regarding parking concerns for seniors; Dr. Aakash Ahuja regarding construction impacts to KHTS; Cindy Russo regarding concerns on proposed development; unnamed speaker on behalf of Karen Frost regarding building requirements in the City; Marie Schab regarding historical preservation; and Emily Nuss regarding historical preservation.
Addressing the City Council in a neutral position were Carl Goldman, representing KHTS, regarding compromise between KHTS and developer; Fred Arnold regarding compromise between KHTS and developer; John Lauermann, representing The Rafters Group, regarding relocation assistance; David Doyle, Chairperson of The Rafters Group, regarding relocation assistance; Aireana Pierson, representing The Rafters Group, regarding relocation concerns; Del Ferguson, representing The Rafters Group, regarding relocation support for The Rafters Group; Tony Maldonado regarding the impact on Metrolink parking for commuters; and John K. regarding traffic lane safety concerns.
Thirty-six written comment cards were received; nine were in support of the item; eight were in opposition of the item; fourteen were neutral; and five did not indicate a position.
Mayor Miranda closed the public comment portion of the public hearing.
Mr. Tolleson exercised his time for rebuttal to the public comments, noting that there are ongoing negotiations with The Rafters Group; was amenable to a construction hours restriction; foresees a proposed reduction in the impact fee paid to the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society from $750,000 to $300,000 due to the reallocation of funds to provide noise mitigation elements; and noted that the developer is following the Specific Plan.
Councilmember Ayala commented that she would not want to remove access to parking spots currently available; would like to see the project be parking auto-sustainable; recommended to the developer that traffic safety and collision mitigation be incorporated into the project’s design; and inquired about the construction schedule for a secondary parking structure. City Manager Ken Striplin responded that a parking structure is envisioned as part of a larger development,
7 Packet Pg. 242 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)
with a Request for Proposal about to commence to seek a partnership with a developer.
Councilmember Ayala commented on parking concerns for commuters at the Newhall Metrolink Station; overall impacts of the project; and inquired whether a public hearing on the item took place at the Planning Commission review of the project, to which Mr. Striplin responded the hearing had previously taken place at City Hall. Councilmember Ayala inquired if the City could require a parking quota, to which City Attorney Joseph Montes stated AB 2097 prohibits the City from requiring parking on certain projects, unless the City determines that the lack of parking would have a substantially negative impact on existing residential and commercial parking.
Councilmember Gibbs requested to know if the project expands an entire city block under the OTN Specific Plan, to which Ms. Iverson noted that it did; to know when and why the number of parking spaces in the OTN Specific Plan grew from 1.53 to 2 per residential unit, to which Planning Manager Patrick Leclair responded that it happened in 2022 as an update to the Unified Development Code; to know if any portion of Railroad Avenue would be closed as a result of this project, to which Mr. Tolleson confirmed it would not; to know why the cost to relocate the historical building was not discussed at the Planning Commission meeting, to which Mr.
Tolleson responded that he thought it obvious that relocation would be cost prohibitive and that an impact fee would be paid as a compromise; and to know where in the historical ordinance it stated that an impact fee needed to be paid, to which Ms. Iverson responded it was not included in the ordinance, rather it would be included as a mitigation factor as determined by the Council.
Councilmember Gibbs also commented that the discussion over the project issues and details should have been brought up and deliberated at the Planning Commission.
Councilwoman McLean stated the Planning Commissioned failed to make a recommendation to the City Council; she would like to have more discussion and study over the details of the project; she was not convinced that the proposed development was consistent with the OTN theme; parking concerns had not yet been adequately addressed; and efforts to preserve historical elements were not being sufficiently undertaken. Councilwoman McLean inquired about the feasibility of a smaller-scale project and expressed the importance of preserving the historical materials of the location of The Rafters Group. Mr. Tolleson responded that a smaller-scale project would not be feasible option, and the project would not move forward with that modification.
Mayor Miranda commented he was in favor of the project; parking issues exist in OTN outside of the proposed project; discussion is underway between the developer and KHTS; and alternatives to the development may not be in the best interest of the City.
Councilwoman McLean asked what is the amount of the parking in lieu fee, to which Ms.
Iverson responded that it totals just over $70,000.
City Attorney Joe Montes recommended that the Council continue the hearing with public comment open in anticipation of new information being presented to the public at the next hearing on the item.
Upon further deliberation, Councilwoman McLean agreed with Mr. Tolleson to work together to address her issues with the project. Councilmember Ayala requested that there be a design 7 Packet Pg. 243 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)
proposal that included traffic safety mitigation elements. Councilmember Gibbs requested that staff present the proposed changes from the developer at the next Council meeting.
Mr. Striplin requested clarification from Council on direction to staff, to which the Council requested modifications to traffic safety elements and building design architectural elements.
Councilmember Gibbs made the motion to continue the Public Hearing with the public comment open to a date certain for the May 13 City Council Meeting. Councilmember Ayala seconded the motion.
RESULT: CONTINUED [4 TO 0]
Next: 5/13/2025 6:00 PM
MOVER: Jason Gibbs, Councilmember
SECONDER: Patsy Ayala, Councilmember
AYES: Miranda, McLean, Gibbs, Ayala
NAYS: None
RECUSED: Weste
ITEM 2
2025 MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATES - FIRST READING
Public Hearing regarding proposed amendments to the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, Old Town Newhall Specific Plan; the Lyons Corridor Plan; and the Soledad Canyon Road Corridor Plan for 2025.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council:
1. Conduct the public hearing.
2. Determine that the project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the common-sense exemption.
3. Introduce an ordinance entitled: “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MASTER CASE 24-112, CONSISTING OF UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 24-001 (UDC24- 001) AND SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 24-001 (SP24-001), AMENDING THE
SANTA CLARITA MUNICIPAL CODE, OLD TOWN NEWHALL SPECIFIC PLAN,
LYONS CORRIDOR PLAN, AND SOLEDAD CORRIDOR PLAN AS SHOWN IN EXHIBITS A-H,” waive reading of the text and consent to read by title only, as listed on the agenda, and pass to a second reading.
Councilmember Gibbs under one motion, moved to continue Agenda Items #2 and #3 to the May 13 City Council Meeting. Councilmember Ayala seconded the motion. 7 Packet Pg. 244 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)
RESULT: CONTINUED [4 TO 0]
Next: 5/13/2025 6:00 PM
MOVER: Jason Gibbs, Councilmember
SECONDER: Patsy Ayala, Councilmember
AYES: Miranda, McLean, Gibbs, Ayala
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Weste
NEW BUSINESS
ITEM 3
FIRST RESPONDER TRIBUTE PROJECT
City Council to receive a presentation sharing proposed location and approach to honor Santa Clarita's first responders.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council review and discuss the proposed concept for the First Responder Tribute Project, and provide direction to staff.
Councilmember Gibbs under one motion, moved to continue Agenda Items #2 and #3 to the May 13 City Council Meeting. Councilmember Ayala seconded the motion.
RESULT: CONTINUED [4 TO 0]
Next: 5/13/2025 6:00 PM
MOVER: Jason Gibbs, Councilmember
SECONDER: Patsy Ayala, Councilmember
AYES: Miranda, McLean, Gibbs, Ayala
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Weste
CONSENT CALENDAR
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Jason Gibbs, Councilmember
SECONDER: Laurene Weste, Mayor Pro Tem
AYES: Ayala, Miranda, Gibbs, McLean, Weste
ITEM 4
APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES – The minutes are submitted for approval.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council approve the minutes of the April 8, 2025, Regular Meeting
7 Packet Pg. 245 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)
ITEM 5
CHECK REGISTER NO. 08
Check Register No. 08 for the Period 03/07/25 through 03/20/25 and 03/27/25. Electronic Funds Transfers for the Period of 03/10/25 through 03/21/25.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council approve and ratify for payment the demands presented in Check Register No. 08.
ITEM 6
STATE LEGISLATION: AB 507, AB 893, AB 1154, AB 1206, AND SB 677 The following state legislative items were presented to the City Council Legislative Committee on March 27, 2025, and are being presented to the City Council for consideration to adopt a position: AB 507 (Haney), AB 893 (Fong), AB 1154 (Carrillo), AB 1206 (Harabedian), and SB 677 (Wiener).
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council:
1. Oppose AB 507 (Haney), AB 893 (Fong), AB 1154 (Carrillo), AB 1206 (Harabedian), and SB 677 (Wiener).
2. Transmit position statements to the authors of the bills, Santa Clarita’s state legislative delegation, appropriate legislative committees, Governor Newsom, and other stakeholder organizations.
ITEM 7
PURCHASE OF A SPECIALIZED EXCAVATOR
City Council consider the purchase of a Caterpillar Excavator Model 306 to support maintenance of the City's stormwater basins and outfalls.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council:
1. Approve the “piggyback” purchase of a new Caterpillar Excavator Model 306, using Sourcewell cooperative purchasing contract #020223-CAT in an amount not to exceed $153,762.
2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
ITEM 8
VISTA CANYON ROAD BRIDGE, PROJECT S3037 - DESIGN CONTRACT
MODIFICATION
This item considers approving a design contract modification for the Vista Canyon Road Bridge project. The modification will allow the design consultant to provide additional construction support services.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council:
7 Packet Pg. 246 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)
1. Extend the current design contract and authorize an increased expenditure authority for bridge engineering design services with Dokken Engineering, in the amount of $200,000, for a revised total contract amount not to exceed $1,058,000.
2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
Addressing the City Council was Tony Maldonado.
ITEM 9
RESOLUTION FOR THE APPLICATION AND RECEIPT OF STATE TRANSIT
ASSISTANCE FUNDS
City Council consideration to adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to submit an annual claim to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for State Transit Assistance funds.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council adopt a resolution allowing the City Manager or designee to submit an annual claim to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for State Transit Assistance funds.
Addressing the City Council was Tony Maldonado.
Adopted Resolution No. 25-11
ITEM 10
2024-25 OVERLAY AND SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - OVERLAY A AND B, PROJECT M0157 - PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS This item considers awarding construction contracts for the 2024-25 Overlay and Slurry Seal Program - Overlay A and Overlay B projects. The annual overlay and slurry seal projects are an integral part of the City of Santa Clarita’s pavement management program. Each year, streets are evaluated and identified for needed pavement preservation and rehabilitation treatments.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council:
1. Approve the plans and specifications for the 2024-25 Overlay and Slurry Seal Program – Overlay A, Project M0157.
2. Approve the plans and specifications for the 2024-25 Overlay and Slurry Seal Program – Overlay B, Project M0157.
3. Find the 2024-25 Overlay and Slurry Seal Program is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Article 19 Section 15301.
4. Award the construction contract for the 2024-25 Overlay and Slurry Seal Program – Overlay A project to Sully-Miller Contracting Company, in the amount of $1,816,805 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $272,520, for a total contract amount not to exceed $2,089,325. 7 Packet Pg. 247 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)
5. Award the construction contract for the 2024-25 Overlay and Slurry Seal Program – Overlay B project to Onyx Paving Company, Inc., in the amount of $5,826,000 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $873,900, for a total contract amount not to exceed $6,699,900.
6. Award the professional services contract to Twining, Inc., to provide project inspection, materials testing, and construction management support services for the 2024-25 Overlay and Slurry Seal Program, in the amount of $1,382,150 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $138,215, for a total contract amount not to exceed $1,520,365.
7. Award the professional services contract to Hunsaker and Associates, Los Angeles, Inc., to provide surveying and monument preservation services for the 2024-25 Overlay and Slurry Seal Program, in the amount of $746,464 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $74,646, for a total contract amount not to exceed $821,110.
8. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
ITEM 11
AGREEMENT WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE
DISTRICT FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF MEASURE A GRANT FUNDS AND PRESERVATION OF 457 +/- ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
VASQUEZ CANYON RANCH
The item considers the authorization to execute an agreement with Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District to accept Measure A grant funds and acquire Vasquez Canyon Ranch for the purpose of open space preservation.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council:
1. Approve and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute an agreement with the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District to accept Measure A grant funds for a total amount of $1,437,195, subject to City Attorney approval.
2. Approve the purchase of 457+/- acres of real property, Assessor Parcel Numbers 2813-013- 0032, 2813-013-033, 2813-014-003, 2813-015-008, 2813-015-010, 2813-015-014, 2813-015- 015, and 2813-016-011, at a total cost of $2,589,314, which includes property purchase price, escrow, title, due diligence costs, trail head improvements, and payment of annual property taxes.
3. Appropriate one-time funds of $1,437,195 from Measure A Fund (Fund 269) to Measure A Acquisition Grant Account R0037269-520104.
4. Appropriate one-time funds of $1,152,119 from Open Space Preservation District Fund (Fund 358) to Open Space Preservation District Expenditure Accounts 3587501-520104 ($1,141,719), 3587501-518503 ($8,400), and 3587501-511101 ($2,000) for the purchase of the property, property taxes, and maintenance fees.
7 Packet Pg. 248 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)
5. Appropriate ongoing funds beginning in Fiscal Year 2025-26 of $62,000 from the Open Space Preservation District Fund (Fund 358) to Open Space Expenditure Accounts 3587501- 518503 ($50,000) and 3587501-511101 ($12,000) for annual property taxes and ongoing maintenance.
6. Find this acquisition exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Article 19, Section 15313 (Class 13); Section 15317 (Class 17); and Section 15325 (Class 25).
7. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
ITEM 12
CONTRACTS FOR BUILDING PLAN REVIEW, BUILDING INSPECTION, AND PERMITRELATED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This item considers awarding contracts to Scott Fazekas & Associates, JAS Pacific, TRB and Associates, and Shums Coda Associates for building plan review, building inspection, and permit-related professional services.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council:
1. Award one-year contracts to Scott Fazekas & Associates, JAS Pacific, TRB and Associates, and Shums Coda Associates for building plan review, building inspection, and permit-related professional services for a combined total annual amount not to exceed $1,000,000, effective Fiscal Year 2025-26.
2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute up to four additional one-year renewal options beginning in Fiscal Year 2026-27, not to exceed the combined total annual contract amount and contingent upon the appropriation of funds by the City Council in the annual budget for such Fiscal Year.
3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
ITEM 13
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LMD ZONE 32 (VISTA CANYON RANCH)
City Council consideration to award a contract to Marina Landscape Services, Inc., to provide recurring landscape maintenance services for Landscape Maintenance District Zone 32 Vista Canyon Ranch.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council:
1. Award a five-year contract to Marina Landscape Services, Inc., to provide landscape maintenance services for Landscape Maintenance District Zone 32 (Vista Canyon Ranch), 7 Packet Pg. 249 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)
for a total contract amount not to exceed $99,580.
2. Appropriate ongoing funds in the amount of $2,916 from the Landscape Maintenance District Fund (Fund 357) to expenditure account 3572464-516110 beginning in Fiscal Year 2025-26.
3. Find that the award of contract is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Article 19 – Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, (h) Maintenance of Existing Landscaping.
4. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION II
No additional requests to speak were received.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Miranda adjourned the Regular Meeting in memory of Diana Cusumano at 10:48 p.m. ______________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________
CITY CLERK
7 Packet Pg. 250 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 22, 2025 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)
Agenda Item: 8
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: CHECK REGISTER NOS. 09 AND 10
DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services
PRESENTER: Brittany Houston
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council approve and ratify for payment the demands presented in Check Register No. 09 and Check Register No. 10.
BACKGROUND
Check Register No. 09 for the Period 03/21/25 through 04/03/25 and 04/10/25 in the aggregate amount of $4,940,774.93 inclusive of Electronic Funds Transfers for the Period 03/24/25 through 04/04/25 in the aggregate amount of $1,357,567.74.
Check Register No. 10 for the Period 04/04/25 through 04/17/25 and 04/24/25 in the aggregate amount of $10,353,127.41 inclusive of Electronic Funds Transfers for the Period 04/07/25 through 04/18/25 in the aggregate amount of $2,808,758.96.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adequate funds are available in the budgeted expenditure accounts to support the Check Register payments.
ATTACHMENTS
Memo - Check Register No. 09
Memo - Check Register No. 10
Check Register No. 09 (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Check Register No. 10 (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) 8 Packet Pg. 251
8.a
Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: Memo - Check Register No. 09 (Check Register No. 09 & No. 10)
8.a
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Memo - Check Register No. 09 (Check Register No. 09 & No. 10)
8.a
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Memo - Check Register No. 09 (Check Register No. 09 & No. 10)
8.b
Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: Memo - Check Register No. 10 (Check Register No. 09 & No. 10)
8.b
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Memo - Check Register No. 10 (Check Register No. 09 & No. 10)
8.b
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Memo - Check Register No. 10 (Check Register No. 09 & No. 10)
Agenda Item: 9
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: LIT FIBER TRANSPORT SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR THE
MASTER'S UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services
PRESENTER: Benny Ives
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Approve a three-year agreement, with two one-year renewal options, that will allow the City to provide lit transport service to The Master’s University.
2. Authorize an increase of $10,000 in Fiscal Year 2024-25 to revenue account 100-431111 Dark Fiber Lease.
3. Authorize an increase of $9,000 annually in Fiscal Year 2025-26 through Fiscal Year 2027- 28 to revenue account 100-431111 Dark Fiber Lease.
4. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
BACKGROUND
The City of Santa Clarita (City) has made significant progress in finding ways to utilize its vast fiber optic network (FON) to promote and facilitate high-speed internet access to local businesses. Key milestones in this endeavor include securing a middle-mile dark fiber connection from Santa Clarita to Downtown Los Angeles (DTLA), the procurement of highcapacity fiber equipment, and an agreement with at least one internet Service Provider (ISP) to provide high-speed internet service via fixed wireless.
Additionally, organizations with a need for Dedicated Internet Access (DIA) of 1 Gigabit per second (Gbps) or higher, who possess their own technical experts, and are within striking distance of the City's FON, may be a candidate to utilize the City's new connection and obtain 9 Packet Pg. 258
DIA from an ISP located in DTLA.
The Master's University (Master’s) is a prime example of such an organization. City staff approached Master’s to discuss the prospects of partnering on a project that would yield mutual benefits - cost savings and redundant, fault-tolerant internet access for Master’s and revenue generation for the City. However, in order to move forward, Master’s needs the City's robust FON and its physical connection to DTLA.
City staff recommends entering into a three-year agreement whereby the City would provide “lit” transport service of 2 Gbps to Master’s. This transport service will utilize the City’s active, also known as “lighted,” fiber equipment to enable Master’s to traverse the City’s FON to DTLA and access the resources it will need to achieve robust internet service for its campus. The “lit” service poses no security concerns to the City because Master’s connection will be designed as a virtual connection operating on its own unique optical wavelength, analogous to a private lane on a multi-lane highway.
The agreement will generate one-time revenue of $10,000 towards necessary fiber equipment plus $9,000 per year for “lit” service for each year of the three-year agreement, for a cumulative contract total of $37,000. It will also enable Master’s to obtain competitive prices for DIA while achieving a fault tolerant path to the internet. If approved, the City anticipates Master’s will be able to utilize the connection within six to eight weeks.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of the recommended action will increase Fiscal Year 2024-25 revenue account 100- 431111 by $10,000, and $9,000 annually from Fiscal Year 2025-26 through Fiscal Year 2027-
28. ATTACHMENTS
CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement
9 Packet Pg. 259
LIT SERVICES AGREEMENT
by and between
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
and
THE MASTER’S UNIVERSITY
9.a
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 1 of 24
LIT SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS LIT SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), made effective as of ____________________, 2024 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, a municipal corporation with primary offices at 23920 Valencia Blvd, Santa Clarita, CA 91355 (“City”), and THE MASTER’S UNIVERSITY, with primary offices at 21726 Placerita Canyon Rd, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 (“MASTER’S” or “Subscriber”) with respect to the following:
R E C I T A L S:
A. The City has constructed a fiber optic infrastructure, including but not limited to the dark fiber, conduit, handholes, manholes, equipment, and other dark fiber-related appurtenances and components (“Fiber Optic Network”) to facilitate the provision of high-speed, state-of-the-art telecommunications services by prospective users in both the public and private sectors.
B. City owns and operates fiber equipment and telecommunications facilities and is in the business of providing certain lit transport services (“Lit Services”) described herein.
C. Subscriber wishes to utilize City’s facilities to subscribe to Lit Services as more particularly described herein, between 22421 Market St, Newhall, CA 91321 (“Newhall Community Center”) and 624 S Grand Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90017 (“One Wilshire Building”) and along third party owned dark fiber (“Third Party Fiber”), subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
D. City and Subscriber seek to enter into this Agreement for Subscriber to subscribe to Lit Services, on the terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth below, the parties hereby agree as follows:
SECTION 1. LIT SERVICES.
1.1 Services Ordered.
City shall provide Lit Services ordered by Subscriber along the route set forth in Exhibit “A”. From time to time the parties may incorporate additional Lit service routes subject to City’s sole discretion. To the extent the City agrees to provide any additional Lit service routes, the parties may amend and replace Exhibit “A”. Lit Services consist of the following:
A. Lit Services are linear, bi-directional, point to point, optical transport circuits enabled by equipment between two (2) sites over a shared optical fiber infrastructure.
9.a
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 2 of 24
B. Lit services are offered at 2 Gbps, but may be upgraded, as mutually agreed upon in the future.
C. Lit Services will be dedicated to Subscriber’s sole use and will originate or terminate at the City’s points of presence at City owned or leased facilities.
D. Lit Services do not include any cross-connects, except to the extent required at the demarcation point in Santa Clarita. It is Subscriber’s responsibility to procure and pay for any cross-connects.
E. Lit Services do not include any physical space for equipment except as noted on Exhibit “A”.
1.2 Service Delivery and Acceptance.
Prior to delivering Lit Services to Subscriber, the City shall conduct acceptance testing (“Acceptance Testing”) to verify that the Lit Services conform with the specifications for the services ordered under this Agreement (the “Specifications”). The City shall notify Subscriber on the date when the Lit Services have been successfully installed and are performing in accordance with the applicable Specifications and are available for Subscriber’s use (“Service Date”).
Subscriber shall have seven (7) calendar days to verify the Lit Services are performing in accordance with the applicable Specifications (the “Verification Period”) and provide the City notice of any rejection of Lit Services to the City. Subscriber’s use of the Lit Services, other than for verification testing, or Subscriber’s failure to reject the Lit Services within the Verification Period shall be deemed an automatic acceptance of the Lit Services.
SECTION 2. TERM.
2.1 Initial Agreement Term.
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, shall continue in effect for a period of three (3) years (the “Initial Term”).
2.2 Extension Term.
Provided that Subscriber is in full compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the term of this Agreement shall be automatically extended for up to two (2) successive periods of one (1) year (each an “Extension Term”), on the same terms and conditions as in effect just before the then-current end of the term. Either Party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement after the Initial Term by providing the other Party with sixty (60) days advance notice of its intent to terminate the Agreement.
9.a
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 3 of 24
SECTION 3. LIT SERVICES FEES.
3.1 Lit Services Fee.
In exchange for a dedicated Lit Service, Subscriber shall pay to City the applicable Lit Services Fee (“Services Fee”) outlined in Exhibit “A.”
3.2 Fee During Any Extension Term, If Any.
In the event of an exercise of the Extension Term, the amount set forth in Exhibit A as “Annual Recurring Charge” (ARC) shall be subject to a five percent increase effective on the anniversary date of the Execution Date (“Adjustment Date”) for the Extension Term.
3.3 Rates and Form of Payments.
The Lit Services Fee (the “Services Fees”) shall be paid, without any prior demand, setoff, counterclaim or deduction for any reason, by check or money order payable to the CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, and shall be mailed or delivered to the following address:
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Attention: Finance Division - Accounts Receivable
23920 Valencia Blvd, Suite 295
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
3.4 Proration.
In the event any portion of the Lit Services is in effect for less than a full calendar year, Subscriber shall pay a pro rata portion of the Services Fee for the fraction of the calendar year that the Lit Services are in effect.
3.5 Payments and Invoices.
The Services Fees shall be paid in accordance with the following payment schedule:
A. Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Lit Service. During the Initial Term and any Extension Terms, the City shall invoice Subscriber on a monthly basis in advance for the Monthly Recurring Charge. The City will endeavor to invoice Subscriber within thirty (30) days following the Service Date and each anniversary thereof. Subscriber shall pay such invoiced amount within thirty (30) days of receipt of the City’s invoice.
B. Non-Recurring Charge (NRC). The City shall invoice Subscriber for the Non-Recurring Charge following the Service Date set forth in Section 1.2.
Subscriber shall pay such amount within thirty (30) days of receipt of the City’s invoice.
9.a
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 4 of 24
3.6 Nonpayment.
If Subscriber fails to pay the undisputed portion of the Fees when due, the City may exercise its remedies after compliance with the notice provision set forth in Section 16, below.
Additionally, the City may assess a late fee of five percent (5%) per month (or the maximum rate allowed under state law, whichever is less) on all amounts payable under this Agreement if not paid when due.
3.7 Payment Disputes.
In the event Subscriber disputes any invoice by City, Subscriber will (a) pay all charges not disputed, and (b) notify City of the dispute in writing, providing the invoice number and an explanation of the issue in dispute. Payment will not prejudice Subscriber’s right to dispute charges, so long as they are disputed in the manner specified in this Section. The parties will cooperate in good faith to resolve any such disputes within a sixty (60) day period after the dispute is submitted to City. If the dispute is not resolved during this period, then either party may seek dispute resolution in accordance with Section 13. If both parties agree that a disputed amount is a legitimate charge, Subscriber will pay such amount within ten (10) calendar days of such determination.
SECTION 4. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS
4.1 Definition of Taxes.
The term “Taxes” as used herein shall mean and refer to any and all taxes, fees, surcharges and other related charges that may be imposed or levied on Subscriber or City by any federal, state, county and local governmental agency, including, but not limited to, possessory interest tax, business or occupation tax (assessed on Subscriber), commercial, deaf, district, excise, high cost fund, lease, lifeline assistance, low income, occupational, privilege, Public Utility Commission, sales, telecommunications relay service, telephone assistance, universal service funding, use, utility user, value-added, 911, or other similar taxes, fees and surcharges as is or may be levied against City and passed through to its customers.
4.2 Obligation to Pay Taxes.
Subscriber shall be obligated to pay any all Taxes assessed, levied or imposed in connection with this Agreement and identified herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Subscriber is not responsible for the payment of any type of tax levied on City based upon (a) City’s net profit, net income or payroll, or (b) franchise taxes measured by City’s capital, capital stock or net worth, or (c) City’s property or assets not used in connection with this Agreement, or (d) right-of-way fees, or (e) any business or occupation tax assessed on the City.
9.a
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 5 of 24
4.3 Agreement to Cooperate.
Subscriber and City agree to make commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with each other and coordinate their mutual efforts concerning audits, or other such inquiries, filings, reports, etc., as may relate solely to the provision, sale or use of purchases, activities or transactions arising from or under this Agreement, which may be required or initiated from or by Subscriber, City or any duly authorized governmental authority relating to Taxes.
SECTION 5. REQUIRED RIGHTS.
City represents and warrants that it has secured the rights necessary for the installation and maintenance of the Fiber Optic Network (“Required Rights”). City shall maintain the Required Rights and will, at its cost, exercise any renewal right thereunder, and will use its best efforts to acquire extensions, additions or replacements as are necessary to cause the Required Rights to continue through the Initial Term and any Extension Terms.
SECTION 6. ACCESS AND USE OF THE FIBER OPTIC NETWORK.
6.1 Interconnection at the Demarcation Points.
Subscriber shall install, or cause to be installed, at its sole cost and expense, fiber optic cabling and any associated infrastructure from the Subscriber’s network (“Subscriber Fibers”) to the Demarcation Points. To the extent that the City is required to specially construct, relocate, or acquire from third parties any fiber optic cabling or associated infrastructure to provide the Lit Services for Subscriber, whether Subscriber cancels or terminates the Agreement prior to the Service Date, Subscriber shall be responsible for the actual and documented costs for such construction, relocation or acquisition.
6.2 No Access to Other Parts of Fiber Optic Network.
Except as required for the Lit Service, which is the subject of this Agreement, Subscriber shall not have access to any part of the Fiber Optic Network without the prior written consent of City, and then only subject to the terms and conditions specified by City.
6.3 Compliance with Applicable Law.
Subscriber warrants that its use of the Lit Services shall comply with all applicable governmental codes, ordinances, laws, rules, regulations, orders, policies and restrictions.
Subscriber may not (i) tamper with other accounts or commit unauthorized intrusion into the City’s Fiber Optic Network;(ii) use Lit Services with the intent to breach or evaluate the City’s network security; (iii) use Lit Services to make deliberate attempts to overload the Fiber Optic Network; or (iv) use Lit Services to transmit viruses, malware or other destructive programming code with the intent to interfere with the Fiber Optic Network or related services. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create a public forum and the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any Subscriber or third-party content or data transmitted over the Lit Services.
9.a
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 6 of 24
6.4 City Equipment.
The telecommunications devices, apparatus and associated equipment owned, leased, or otherwise obtained by City to provide Lit Services (“City Equipment”), shall remain the sole and exclusive property of the City notwithstanding that it may be or become attached or affixed to real property, and nothing contained herein grants or conveys to Subscriber any right, title or interest in any City Equipment. Subscriber may not, and may not permit others to, alter, adjust, encumber, tamper, repair, rearrange, change, remove, relocate, or damage any City Equipment or the Fiber Optic Network without the prior written consent of City. Subscriber may not cause any liens to be placed on any City Equipment or the Fiber Optic Network. Subscriber shall be liable to City for any loss or damage to City Equipment or Fiber Optic Network caused by Subscriber or Subscriber’s employees, contractors, agents or end users. Nothing herein shall prevent City from using the Fiber Optic Network and City Equipment to provide services or grant a license to other customers.
6.5 Subscriber Equipment.
Subscriber shall, at its sole cost and expense, procure any equipment necessary to implement or receive Lit Services (“Subscriber Equipment”). Subscriber Equipment shall be compatible with the City’s requirements and subject to the City’s approval prior to installation.
City shall have the right to inspect and approve the installation of all Subscriber Equipment prior to commencing any Lit Services. Subscriber shall coordinate with the City to install, maintain, or repair Subscriber Equipment. Promptly upon notice from City, Subscriber shall eliminate any hazard, interference or obstruction that any such Subscriber Equipment is causing or may cause as reasonably determined by City. Subject to the City’s consent, which the City may withhold in its sole discretion. Subscriber may install Subscriber Equipment in City owned or leased facilities.
6.6 Damage.
If Subscriber or any of its agents, invitees, employees, representatives, contractors, subcontractors or consultants damage the City’s Fiber Optic Network or any other property owned by the City, Subscriber shall reimburse the City for all of its reasonable and documented costs of repairing the Fiber Optic Network or other property. Total amounts City may be eligible for upon determination of fault caused by Subscriber is limited to 2 years of the ARC.
SECTION 7. MAINTENANCE.
7.1 Maintenance of Structural Aspects.
City shall maintain the Lit Services such that they at all times conform to the applicable specifications. The City’s maintenance responsibilities under this Agreement shall only apply to network elements under the City’s exclusive control and shall not apply beyond Subscriber’s demarcation points. Subscriber shall not perform or access the Fiber Optic Network to conduct maintenance or repairs without the express written authorization of the City.
9.a
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 7 of 24
7.2 Delegation of Maintenance Services.
City may subcontract for testing, maintenance, repair, restoration, relocation, or other operational and technical services for the maintenance of the Fiber Optic Network; however, any delegation or subcontracting by City shall not operate to relieve City of its responsibilities under this Agreement.
7.3 Notification of Problems.
Subscriber shall promptly notify City of any matters pertaining to any damage or impending damage to or loss of the use of Lit Services that are known to it and that could reasonably be expected to adversely affect the Fiber Optic Network. City shall promptly notify Subscriber of any matters pertaining to any damage or impending damage to or loss of Lit Services that are known to it and that could reasonably be expected to adversely affect Subscriber’s use thereof.
7.4 Third Party Fiber Problems.
Subscriber acknowledges that Lit Services will traverse across the Fiber Optic Network and Third Party Fiber that the City possesses the legal right to use, the latter of which shall be subject to the availability and maintenance terms set forth by the owner of the Third Party Fiber.
The City does not warrant or guarantee any particular data distortion rate along Third Party Fiber. Subscriber shall promptly notify City of any matters pertaining to any loss of Lit Services that are known to it and that could reasonably be expected to adversely affect Lit Services. City shall promptly notify Subscriber of any matters pertaining to any damage or impending damage to or loss of Lit Services that are known to it and that could reasonably be expected to adversely affect the Lit Services or Subscriber’s use thereof.
SECTION 8. WARRANTY.
8.1 City warrants and represents that it possesses and will maintain all applicable licenses, approvals, registrations and certifications required under all applicable governmental laws, codes, ordinances, statutes and regulations in order to perform its obligations under this Agreement.
8.2 Subscriber warrants and represents that all network traffic handled by the City is compliant with applicable governmental laws, codes, ordinances, statues and regulations and those established in this Agreement.
8.3 EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED HEREIN, THE SERVICES ARE
PROVIDED AS-IS AND THE CITY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED WARRANTY WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. THE WARRANTIES AND REMEDIES SET FORTH ABOVE CONSTITUTE
THE ONLY WARRANTIES AND REMEDIES WITH RESPECT TO THIS AGREEMENT
AND ARE IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, WRITTEN OR ORAL, STATUTORY,
9.a
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 8 of 24
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. THE CITY
FURTHER DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTENT
OF ANY COMMUNICATION TRANSMITTED BY SUBSCRIBER OR OTHERS AND
DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNAUTHORIZED USE OR MISUSE OF THE LIT SERVICES.
SECTION 9. INDEMNIFICATION.
Subscriber shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council, boards and commissions, employees, and agents from and against all third-party liability, loss, cost, damage, expense, claims or cause of action of any nature whatsoever, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from Subscriber’s use of Lit Services under this Agreement; provided, however, that Subscriber shall not have any obligation to indemnify, defend or hold harmless for any claims arising from the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the City.
SECTION 10. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY.
10.1. IN NO EVENT WILL EITHER PARTY BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER PARTY
FOR ANY INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, RELIANCE, OR
PUNITIVE DAMAGES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING BUT
NOT LIMITED TO ANY LOST PROFITS, LOST REVENUES, LOST SAVINGS, OR HARM TO SUBSCRIBER’S BUSINESS OR SUBSCRIBER’S CUSTOMERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OF LIT SERVICES OR THIS AGREEMENT. EACH PARTY HEREBY RELEASES THE OTHER PARTY FROM ANY SUCH CLAIM.
10.2. Disclaimer of Internet Performance. City does not and cannot control the flow of data to and from the City via the internet. Such flow depends in large part on the performance of internet services provided or controlled by third parties. At times, actions or inactions of third parties can impair and disrupt the Lit Services. City will use commercially reasonable efforts to remedy and avoid such events but cannot guarantee that such events will not occur.
Accordingly, City disclaims any and all liability resulting from or relating to such events.
10.3. Limitation of Damages. In addition to the limitations set forth above, Subscriber agrees that in the event of any claim or cause of action by Subscriber arising out of connected with this Agreement, the maximum amount of City’s liability of loss to Subscriber, regardless of the amount of loss Subscriber may have suffered, shall be the amount of Fees paid by Subscriber to City within the prior year.
10.4. No Personal Liability for City Personnel. In no event will any City board, agency, member, officer, employee, agent, director, contractor, subcontractor or representative be personally liable to Subscriber, its successors or assigns, for any default, breach, other nonperformance or sum unpaid sum by the City. The provisions in this Section 10.4 shall survive this Agreement’s revocation, termination or expiration.
9.a
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 9 of 24
SECTION 11. INSURANCE.
Upon the Execution Date, Subscriber shall maintain insurance in compliance with the terms set forth in the Insurance Requirements attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and shall provide evidence of such coverage to the City upon written request. In addition, throughout the Term of this Agreement, Subscriber shall also maintain sufficient property insurance to cover any Subscriber Equipment and that Subscriber shall look solely to its own insurance policies for any recovery of damages to Subscriber’s Equipment.
SECTION 12. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION.
12.1 Notice of Breach.
In the event either party fails to perform the obligations set forth in this Agreement, the nondefaulting party must provide written notice of such default including reasonable detail of the default, and thirty (30) days to cure the default.
12.2 Remedies Available Upon Default.
Upon the failure by the defaulting party to cure any default in accordance with Section
12.1, the nondefaulting party may do any or all of the following:
A. Terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice of its desire to terminate;
B. Subject to Section 10.3 as applied to Subscriber, pursue any legal remedies it may have under this Agreement, as well as applicable law or principles of equity.
12.3 Survival of Remedies.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no termination of this Agreement shall affect the rights or obligations of any party hereto with respect to any payment hereunder for services rendered prior to the date of termination.
12.4 Obligation to Remove Subscriber Equipment Upon Termination.
Upon termination, Subscriber will promptly disconnect and remove the Subscriber Equipment in a neat and orderly manner, and repair all damage directly caused by such removal at Subscriber’s sole expense, excluding normal wear and tear.
12.5 Survival of Terms.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section, the expiration or termination of this Agreement shall not affect the rights or obligations of either party hereto with respect to any payment for services rendered prior to the date of termination, or pursuant to the Sections of this
9.a
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 10 of 24
Agreement entitled Indemnification, Limitation of Liability, Insurance and Taxes with respect to matters or claims arising or accruing prior to expiration or termination hereof, or pursuant to any other provisions of this Agreement that, by their sense and context, are intended to survive termination of this Agreement.
SECTION 13. DISPUTE RESOLUTION.
Any claim, dispute or controversy arising from or relating to this Agreement, which would otherwise require or allow resort to any court, shall be determined exclusively by final and binding arbitration as set forth in this Section. This Section shall apply to all claims and disputes, whether the disputes or claims arise in tort, contract, or pursuant to a statute, regulation, or ordinance now in existence or which may in the future be enacted or recognized. The aggrieved party must submit a written demand for arbitration to the other party within the time prescribed by the state or federal statute of limitations applicable to the claim asserted. Failure to submit and serve a written demand for arbitration within the applicable statutory period shall constitute a waiver and an absolute bar to the raising or prosecution of that claim in any form. The arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the California Arbitration Act (as set forth in Title 9 of the California Code of Civil Procedure (sections 1280 et seq.) and the rules and procedures for employment disputes set forth by the Employment Arbitration Rules and Procedures (the “Rules”) of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (“JAMS”). The arbitration shall take place before a single arbitrator selected in accordance with the Rules. The final decision of the arbitrator shall be binding on the parties and shall not be subject to appellate review.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party shall be entitled to obtain immediate equitable relief, such as by temporary restraining order or injunction, in Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles to prevent any violation of any covenants, conditions or provisions contained in this Agreement.
SECTION 14. GOVERNING LAWS.
Any action related to this Agreement will be governed the laws of the State of California without regard to choice of laws principles and exclusive venue for any action involving this Agreement must be in accordance with Section 13.
SECTION 15. RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES.
The relationship between the parties shall not be that of partners, agents or joint venturers for one another, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a partnership or agency agreement between them for any purposes, including, but not limited to federal income tax purposes. In performing any of their obligations hereunder, the parties shall be independent contractors or independent parties and shall discharge their contractual obligations at their own risk. Subscriber acknowledges that the City enters into and performs its obligations under this Agreement solely in its proprietary capacity, and that the City cannot and shall not in any manner guarantee the granting of any regulatory approvals or entitlements pertaining to this Agreement.
9.a
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 11 of 24
SECTION 16. NOTICES.
Any notice, demand or other correspondence required to be given in connection with or pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered by personal service or by United States certified or registered mail, with postage prepaid, or by facsimile addressed as follows:
To the City:
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Attention: City Manager
23920 VALENCIA BLVD
SANTA CLARITA, CA 91355
With a copy to (which copy shall not constitute notice):
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Attention: Technology Services Division - Manager
23920 VALENCIA BLVD
SANTA CLARITA, CA 91355
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Attention: City Attorney
23920 VALENCIA BLVD
SANTA CLARITA, CA 91355
To THE MASTER’S UNIVERSITY:
THE MASTER’S UNIVERSITY
Attention: XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Either party, by similar written notice, may change the address to which notices shall be sent.
SECTION 17. WAIVER.
No failure, forbearance, neglect, or delay by either party in regard to enforcing this Agreement or exercising any rights contained in this Agreement shall affect or limit such party’s right to strictly enforce same, and shall not constitute or be implied as a waiver of any right to enforce same in the future.
9.a
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 12 of 24
SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT.
Subscriber shall not resell or redistribute access to the Lit Services in any manner, or assign or transfer its rights and obligations under this Agreement or any interest therein, directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior written consent of City which may be withheld in the City’s sole discretion. Any attempt to do so without the City’s consent shall be null and void and be a material default by Subscriber under this Agreement without a requirement for notice and a right to cure. Any assignee or transferee, shall acquire no right by reason of such attempted assignment or transfer. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions to the contrary, Subscriber may, without City’s consent but with notice to the City, assign this Agreement to any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, Subscriber, or to a successor by merger or the purchaser of substantially all of the assets of Subscriber (each a “Permitted Assignment”). Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, a Permitted Assignment will be subject to all the following conditions: (i) the assignee may use the Lit Services only for the uses permitted under this Agreement and for no other purpose whatsoever; (ii) Subscriber provides the City with notice as soon as reasonably practicable before the effective date of such Permitted Assignment, stating the contact information for the proposed assignee and providing financial information establishing that the proposed assignee has the capital and fiscal qualifications greater than or equal to Subscriber’s as it existed on the Effective Date; (iii) Subscriber is in good standing under this Agreement; (iv) the assignee shall covenant to perform all Subscriber’s obligations under this Agreement and Subscriber will be and remain liable jointly and severally with the assignee for all obligations to be performed by assignee; and (v) within 30 days after Subscriber receives a written demand from the City, Subscriber shall reimburse the City for all reasonable and documented costs incurred by the City in connection with the Permitted Assignment.
SECTION 19. FORCE MAJEURE.
If either City, Subscriber or third party under Section 7.4 is delayed in or prevented from the performance of any act required under this Agreement by reason of acts of God, severe weather and storms, earthquakes or other natural occurrences, strikes or other labor unrest, power failures, nuclear or other civil or military emergencies, or acts of legislative, judicial, executive or administrative authorities, then the performance of that act will be excused for the period of the delay, and the period for the performance of that act will be extended for a period equivalent to the period of that delay; provided, however, that the party claiming such delay notifies the other party in writing of such cause of delay within ten (10) days of the commencement of the delay. Nothing in this section shall excuse Subscriber from the prompt payment of any installation costs, license and maintenance fees, taxes, or any other charges that are required of Subscriber under this Agreement.
SECTION 20. MISCELLANEOUS.
20.1 The covenants, undertakings, and agreements set forth in this Agreement are solely for the benefit of and enforceable by the parties or their respective successors or permitted assigns.
9.a
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 13 of 24
20.2 Except as otherwise expressly provided, the rights and remedies set forth in this Agreement are in addition to, and cumulative of, all other rights and remedies at law or in equity.
20.3 The headings in this Agreement are strictly for convenience and do not amplify or limit any of the terms, provisions or conditions hereof.
20.4 In the event any term of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, in whole or in part, neither the validity of the remaining part of such term nor the validity of the remaining terms of this Agreement will be in any way affected.
20.5 This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument executed by the parties.
20.6 No failure to exercise and no delay in exercising, on the part of either party, any right, power or privilege hereunder will operate as a waiver, except as expressly provided herein.
20.7 This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, all of which taken together constitute one and the same instrument
20.8 If any conflict or contradiction exists between the Agreement and an Addendum, the terms of the Addendum shall control.
20.9 The language of each part of this Agreement will be construed simply and according to its fair meaning, and this Agreement will never be construed either for or against either party.
20.10 This Agreement is not intended to (and shall not be construed to) give any third party, which includes without limitation Subscriber’s customers or any other third-party beneficiaries, any right, title or interest in this Agreement or the real or personal property(ies) that may be affected by the same.
SECTION 21. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES.
The Parties agree that agreements ancillary to this Agreement and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission. Such facsimile signature will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
9.a
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 14 of 24
SECTION 22. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.
This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements and representations respecting the subject matter contained herein and contains all the terms, conditions and obligations of the parties with respect to this Agreement. This Agreement may only be amended or modified in a writing signed by both parties. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 23. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION.
The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written agreement. City’s City Manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of City.
SECTION 24. CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
Subscriber will comply with all applicable conflict of interest laws and regulations including, without limitation, City’s Purchasing Standards of Conduct to the extent applicable to this Agreement.
SECTION 25. RECITALS AND EXHIBITS.
The Recitals set forth above and the following Exhibits are incorporated as a term of this Agreement:
Exhibit “A” Lit Services Addendum
Exhibit “B” Maintenance and Operations Specifications
Exhibit “C” Insurance Requirements
In the event of any conflict between or among the provisions of this Agreement or the Exhibits to the Agreement, such conflict shall be resolved in the following order of precedence: (i) Lit Services Addendum; (ii) the Agreement; and (iii) Insurance Requirements; and (iv) remaining Exhibits.
9.a
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 15 of 24
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party has caused this Agreement to be executed on the date set above by its duly authorized representative.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
a municipal corporation
By: ______________________ Date: ___________
Ken Striplin
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________ Date: ___________
Joseph Montes
City Attorney
THE MASTER’S UNIVERSITY
By: ______________________ Date: ___________
Name __________________
Title: __________________
9.a
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 16 of 24
EXHIBIT “A”
LIT SERVICES ADDENDUM
LIT SERVICES ADDENDUM – LIT FEE
Service
Demarcation Points
Non-Recurring
Charge
(NRC)
Monthly Recurring
Charge
(MRC)
Annual Recurring
Charge
A (ARC)-Location Z-Location
Lit Services
2 Gbps
22421 Market St,
Santa Clarita, CA
91321
624 S Grand Ave,
16th Floor,
Los Angeles, CA
90017
$10,000 $750
$9,000
(12 x $750)
NRC Total: $10,000
MRC Total: $750
ARC Total: $9,000
INITIAL 3 YEAR TERM AGREEMENT TOTALS
Annual Fees Total Three (3) Year
Annual Recurring
Charge
(ARC)
Total
NonRecurring
Charge
(NRC)
Three (3) Year
Agreement
Lit Services Fee Total:
$9,000 $27,000 $10,000 $37,000
NOTES
1. Non-recurring charge shall consist of fees necessary to conduct all fiber splices, inspection, device procurement and configuration, and setup.
2. ARC = Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) x 12 months.
3. Invoices shall be payable for MRC each month.
9.a
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 17 of 24
EXHIBIT “B”
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS SPECIFICATIONS AND PROCEDURES
1. Defined Terms
a. “Routine Maintenance” is all preventive maintenance activities, upgrades and repairs, including but not limited to those activities outlined in this Exhibit. b. “Non-Routine Maintenance” is all efforts and activities in response to an emergency circumstance which requires restoration.
2. General
a. City shall provide a means for Subscriber to report trouble with Lit Services to trained and qualified personnel on a twenty-four (24) hours a day, (7) seven days a week basis, which may include a City contractor or consultant (“Technician”). Subscriber shall report trouble to the City at 661-255-4388. Helpdesk during normal business hours as defined herein and outside normal business hours in accordance with the escalation list “City Escalation List” described in this Section 2(c). The normal business hours shall mean and refer to the hours between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time, Mondays through Fridays, except for City observed holidays. The City shall dispatch a Technician along the Fiber Optic Network to handle and repair problems reported by Subscriber or otherwise discovered by the City. b. The Technician shall be available for dispatch twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week. City shall use best efforts to have its Technician at the site requiring a nonroutine maintenance activity within four (4) hours from notification by Subscriber or other discovery by the City, whichever occurs first. In the event that the non-routine maintenance activity involves third party networks, response times and remediation will depend on the third party and the City provides no representation or warranty as to third party response times; provided, however, that the City will provide Subscriber notice as soon as reasonably practicable that the non-routine maintenance activity involves a third party and whether such party has responded to the issue.
c. Subscriber shall utilize the City Escalation List provided by City, to report and seek immediate initial redress of exceptions noted in the performance of City in meeting maintenance service objectives. City may update the Operations Escalation List from time to time.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA Escalation Contact List
Tier Contact Title Tel. # Email Address
1 City Helpdesk 661-255-4388 [email protected] 2 City Fiber Team 661-286-4070 [email protected] 3 Information Services Manager 661-373-1616 [email protected]
9.a
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 18 of 24
d. City shall take workmanlike care to prevent impairment to the signal continuity and performance of the Lit Services. The precautions to be taken by City shall include notification to Subscriber. In addition, City shall reasonably cooperate with Subscriber in sharing information and analyzing the disturbances regarding the Lit Services. e. City shall notify Subscriber at least seven (7) days prior to the date of any planned routine maintenance activity. In the event that a City-planned activity is canceled or delayed for any reason as previously notified, City shall notify Subscriber at City’s earliest opportunity and will comply with the provisions of the previous sentence to reschedule any delayed activity. f. Routine maintenance work that is reasonably expected to produce any signal discontinuity must be coordinated between the parties, and performed in accordance with Scheduled Maintenance Procedures. “Scheduled Maintenance Procedures” or “SMP” means a pre-arranged period of time reserved for performing certain work on City’s Fiber Optic Network that may impact communication services. Unless otherwise agreed by Subscriber, SMP will be completed after 10:00 p.m. and before 6:00 a.m., local time. Major Fiber Optic Network work such as fiber rolls, relocations, and hot cuts will also be scheduled utilizing SMP. g. Subscriber shall provide and maintain titles and telephone numbers of primary and secondary contact personnel “The Master’s University” who are trained in trouble-shooting network problems. These personnel will diagnose potential problems with Subscriber’s equipment and determine there are no problems with such equipment prior to making a NonRoutine Maintenance request to City.
THE MASTER’s UNIVERSITY Escalation Contact List
Tier Contact Title Tel. # Email Address
1 Brian Pam – Director of IT
Operations 661-362-2345 [email protected]
2 Gianna Bisares – Director of
IT Service Management and
Security 661-362-2206 [email protected]
3 Paul Sedy – Chief
Information Officer 661-362-2340 [email protected]
3. Fiber Optic Network.
a. City shall maintain the Fiber Optic Network in good and operable condition and shall repair the fiber in workmanlike manner to the extent necessary to provide Lit Services.
b. City shall perform appropriate routine maintenance on the Fiber Optic Network in accordance with City’s then current preventative maintenance procedures to the
9.a
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 19 of 24
extent necessary to provide Lit Services. City’s maintenance procedures shall not substantially deviate from industry practice.
c. City responsibility ends at demarcation point. Testing would take place from demarcation point A to demarcation location Z.
4. Restoration
a. When restoring a cut fiber, the parties agree to work together to restore all traffic as quickly as possible. City, upon arriving on the site of the cut, shall determine the best course of action to be taken to restore the fiber and shall begin restoration efforts as required in the Agreement.
b. It will be the responsibility of City and Subscriber to report to one another respectively of any known environmental hazards that would restrict or jeopardize any maintenance work activities in shelters or right of way areas of operations. c. Upon notification of interruption of fiber service, disrepair, impairment or other need for repair or restoration of the Lit Services, City shall pursue commercially reasonable efforts to mobilize technicians to achieve necessary repair or restoration, including, but without limitation, to have maintenance personnel at the affected site within four (4) hours after receipt of such notice with the required restoration material and equipment. If Subscriber’s use of the Lit Services is interrupted due to the occurrence of a Force Majeure event, repairs and restoration will be made as expeditiously as possible under the circumstances. d. For purposes of this section, “commercially reasonable efforts” means activities and performances consistent with prudent utility practice, existing contract provisions for City hourly employees, preserving Fiber Optic Network integrity, and response times that do not jeopardize the health and safety of the employees and agents of City and Subscriber. e. City maintenance employees or contractors shall be responsible for correcting or repairing fiber discontinuity or damage, including, but not limited to, the non-routine repair necessary to provide the Lit Services. City shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resume Lit Services after traffic-affecting discontinuity as soon as possible after learning of the discontinuity or the service affecting situation.
5. Network Availability
a. City will, to the best of its ability, provide uninterrupted service to Subscriber. b. Network availability of Lit services will be available to Subscriber 99.9% of the available time each month.
9.a
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 20 of 24
c. Network availability is the number of minutes in a calendar month during which the service is available to exchange data between the two (2) demarcs and shall be determined as follows:
(Total Minutes in Calendar month – Total Minutes of Non-Availability) / Total Minutes in Calendar Month
d. Total Minutes in Calendar Month means 30 days x 24 hours x 60 minutes = 43,200 minutes, which equates to 100% Availability
e. Total Minutes of Non-Availability means the total of all minutes of network nonavailability in a calendar month. This shall be measured from the time Subscriber’s report of service trouble is determined to constitute a service outage until the time service is restored.
6. Credit Allowances
a. Service Outage Credit - If Lit Service suffers an outage exhibiting less than 99.9% Network Availability (Service Outage), Subscriber will be entitled to a credit as follows, calculated as a percentage of MRC, which is simply ARC / 12 months; and is subject to the requirements and limitations of this agreement:
Network Availability in a Month
From To Service Outage Credit Amount
100% 99.9% 0% of the MRC
<99.9% 99.7% 5% of the MRC
<99.7% 99.2% 10% of the MRC
<99.2% 98.2% 15% of the MRC
<98.2% 0% 25% of the MRC
b. Subscriber’s total service outage credit(s) in any one (1) month will not exceed one (1) month’s MRC and no credits will be applied to future MRC’s.
Subscriber must notify City and request credit within thirty (30) days after the Service Outage, or will waive its right to such credit allowance for such event. Additionally, to be eligible for service outage credits, Subscriber must be in good standing with the City and current in all of its obligations.
c. Chronic Trouble (as defined below) Subscriber may disconnect Lit Services with thirty (30) days’ prior written notice without incurring early termination fees and is released from all contract liability. “Chronic Trouble” is defined as: (i) a single
9.a
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 21 of 24
service outage in excess of twenty-four (24) hours; or (ii) more than four (4) outages of less than 98.2% Network Availability in any consecutive thirty (30) day period. d. Events Excepted from Service Outage Credit - Subscriber shall not receive any Service Outage Credit for any Service Outage, arising from or caused, in whole or in part, by any of the following events:
i. Subscriber’s (including its agents, contractors and vendors) acts or omissions;
ii. Failure on the part of Subscriber’s equipment,
iii. Failure of electrical power at the Newhall Community Center iv. City’s inability to obtain access required to remedy a defect due to any safety restrictions;
v. Scheduled, routine maintenance periods;
vi. Scheduled upgrade of Lit Services;
vii. Third-party fiber problems
viii. Force Majeure Event; or
ix. Disconnection or suspension of Lit Services by City pursuant to a right provided under this Agreement.
9.a
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 22 of 24
EXHIBIT “C”
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Contractor’s Insurance
Prior to commencing work, the Contractor shall procure and maintain at Contractor’s own cost and expense for the duration of the Contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work or services hereunder by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. The cost of such insurance shall be included in Contractor’s bid.
Without in any way affecting the indemnity provided, the Contractor shall secure before commencement of the work and throughout the contract the following types and amounts of insurance:
Minimum Limits of Insurance
Contractor shall obtain insurance of the types and in the amounts described below:
1) Commercial General Liability Insurance
Contractor shall maintain commercial general liability (CGL) with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence/$2,000,000 in the annual aggregate. 2) Business Auto and Umbrella Liability Insurance
Contractor shall maintain business auto liability with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each accident.
3) Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance Contractor shall maintain workers’ compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
Minimum Scope of Insurance
1) CGL insurance shall be written on Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors, products-completed operations, personal injury and advertising injury liability assumed under an insured contract (including the tort liability of another assumed in a business contract), and explosion, collapse and underground hazards.
2) Business Auto Insurance shall cover liability arising out of any auto (including owned, hired, and non-owned autos). Coverage shall be written on Insurance
9.a
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 23 of 24
Services Office form CA 00 01, CA 00 05, CA 00 12, CA 00 20, or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage equivalent to that provided in the 1990 and later editions of CA 00 01.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to the CITY OF SANTA CLARITA. Contractor shall guarantee that their deductibles do not limit their liability (if any) under this agreement.
Other Insurance Provisions
The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1) CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by or on behalf of the contractor; and with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. Under the CGL policy, using the Insurance Services Office additional insured endorsement form CG 20 10 or a substitute providing equivalent coverage, and under the commercial umbrella, if any. City and other additional insureds mentioned in this paragraph shall not, by reason of their inclusion as additional insureds, become liable for any payment of premiums to carriers for such coverage.
2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary as respects the CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Coverage shall not extend to any indemnity coverage for the active negligence of the additional insured in any case where an agreement to indemnify the additional insured would be invalid under subdivision (b) of Section 2782 of the Civil Code.
General Liability, Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from activities and operations of Contractor in the performance of services under the contract.
9.a
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University) 24 of 24
All Coverages
1) Each insurance required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given (add user department and specify specific individual and title) to the City.
2) If Contractor, for any reason, fails to maintain insurance coverage which is required pursuant to this Contract, the same shall be deemed a material breach of contract.
City, at its sole option, may terminate this Contract and obtain damages from the Contractor resulting from said breach. Alternatively, City may purchase such coverage (but has no special obligation to do so), and without further notice to the Contractor, City may deduct from sums due to the Contractor any premium costs advanced by the City for such insurance.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:6 unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager.
Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the CITY OF SANTA CLARITA with original certificates and amendatory endorsements effecting coverage required by this section. The certificates and endorsements for each policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements should be on forms approved by the CITY OF SANTA CLARITA. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the CITY OF SANTA CLARITA before work commences. The CITY OF SANTA CLARITA reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications at any time.
Subcontractors
Contractor shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.
Contractor will have the right to select the contractors/subcontractors who will perform work for Contractor under the Agreement, subject to the prior approval of City, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld.
9.a
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: CoSC MASTERS LitSvcs Agreement (Lit Fiber Service - The Masters University)
Agenda Item: 10
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: MICROSOFT ENTERPRISE LICENSE AGREEMENT
DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services
PRESENTER: Ryan James
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Approve the use of a “piggyback” agreement using Riverside County Master Agreement #ITARC-00934 with Dell Inc. to enter into a three-year contract for the continued use of Microsoft products in the amount of $179,923, and authorize a ten percent contingency in the amount of $17,992 for potential new licenses, for a total contract amount not to exceed $197,915.
2. Appropriate funds from the General Fund (Fund 100) to Expenditure Account 1002200- 516101 in the annual ongoing amount of $18,000 beginning in Fiscal Year 2025-26, contingent upon the appropriation of funds in the annual budget for such fiscal years.
3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
BACKGROUND
The City of Santa Clarita (City) utilizes Microsoft (MS) software to operate desktop computers, servers, databases, applications, and email. The contractual agreement between the City and MS, known as an Enterprise Agreement (EA), grants licensed use of MS products and authorizes the City to use, connect, and receive support for Windows computers, Windows servers, SQL Server, Exchange email, Systems Center and Configuration Manager, Remote Desktop, and the Microsoft Developer Network. A typical EA lasts for three years, at which time the agreement is re-entered to allow the continued use and support of MS software. The existing agreement is set to expire on June 30, 2025, and was last approved by the City Council on June 28, 2022.
For over 16 years, the City has utilized an MS EA to ensure proper licensing of MS software as 10 Packet Pg. 285
well as the flexibility for growth as the organization expands. Through the EA, City computers are licensed to connect to Windows servers from desktop computers to share network resources, including storage, email, printers, as well as a centralized repository for managing user access and computer configurations.
In January 2024, the City Council approved an amendment to the EA to add licenses for the City’s part-time/temporary/seasonal staff (PTS), and account for the growth in full-time employees (FTE). In doing so, the number of EA licenses increased from 575 to 885. In doing so, FTE and PTS staff were properly licensed to be compliant with Microsoft’s licensing terms.
This item seeks City Council’s authorization to enter into a new MS Enterprise Agreement for three years for a contract total not to exceed $197,915, inclusive of a ten percent contingency for growth in potential new software licenses. There are several benefits of an MS Enterprise Agreement, such as Software Assurance that allows the City to upgrade to the latest version of any of the products managed under the agreement’s term. This allows the City to be on the latest versions of the covered MS software and benefit from the feature and security enhancements at no additional cost. Software Assurance also provides City staff with support, tools, training, and the ability to demo and test software prior to deployment.
The use of "piggyback" purchasing allows the City to place orders against a competitively awarded public agency contract. The City is using Riverside County Master Agreement #ITARC-00934, which was competitively solicited and awarded to Dell on September 10, 2024, allowing the City to license MS software. City staff finds this contract provides the most competitive pricing for licensing of MS products.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
Upon the approval of the recommended action, additional annual ongoing budget in expenditure account 1002200-516101 (General Fund 100) in the amount of $18,000 will be appropriated beginning in Fiscal Year 2025-26, contingent upon the appropriation of funds in the annual budget for such fiscal years.
ATTACHMENTS
Santa Clarita EA Renewal
10 Packet Pg. 286
Sam Andrews
[email protected]
512.720.4469
Customer: City of Santa Clarita
Contract: Riverside County Master Agreement - ITARC-00934 (8084445) Date of Issue: 4/9/2025 Renewal estimate for EA# xxxxx (expires 6/30/2025) Quote Expires: 5/31/2025 Product Description Mfg# Quantity Unit Price Ext. Price Core CAL ALng SA UCAL W06-00446 885 $50.41 $44,612.85
Exchange Server Standard ALng SA 312-02257 4 $130.79 $523.16 SQL Server Standard Core ALng SA 2L 7NQ-00292 4 $662.43 $2,649.72 Visual Studio Ent with GitHub ALng SA QEJ-00003 1 $1,101.36 $1,101.36 Visio Standard ALng SA D86-01253 1 $58.03 $58.03
Win Remote Desktop Services CAL ALng SA UCAL 6VC-01254 40 $26.70 $1,068.00 Win Server DC Core ALng SA 2L 9EA-00278 60 $142.27 $8,536.20 Win Server External Connector ALng SA R39-00396 3 $373.02 $1,119.06 Win Server Standard Core ALng SA 2L 9EM-00270 14 $21.84 $305.76 $0.00
Annual Payment Section 1: $59,974.14
Product Description Mfg# Quantity Months Unit Price Ext. Price $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Annual Payment Section 2: $0.00
Notes: Total Annual Payment Yr 1 $59,974.14
Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) Master#: 8084445 Total Annual Payment Yr 2 $59,974.14 Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) Enrollment#: Future/TBD 7/1/2025 Total Annual Payment Yr 3 $59,974.14 Riverside County Master Agreement - ITARC-00934 Total of 3 years of Payments $179,922.42 Notes:
Quote prepared by: Chris A Johnson
Section 1- Licenses and Software Assurance
Section 2- Monthly Subscriptions
10.a
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Santa Clarita EA Renewal (MICROSOFT ENTERPRISE LICENSE AGREEMENT)
Agenda Item: 11
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR VIRTUALIZATION SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services
PRESENTER: Benny Ives
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Approve the use of a “piggyback” agreement using Sourcewell contract #121923-CDW with CDW Government, LLC for a total three-year contract amount not to exceed $136,000 for VMware software and support services.
2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
BACKGROUND
The City of Santa Clarita (City) has been utilizing datacenter virtualization software, known as VMware, since 2007 to manage and administer all of the computer servers operating at the City Hall and Transit Maintenance Facility (TMF) datacenters.
VMware is the market leader in virtualization software, which allows a single, physical computer server to house upwards of 20 virtual servers. This technology was first introduced in the datacenter marketplace in 2001 and initiated a paradigm shift in the way datacenters are designed and managed due to the cost and management savings achieved by reducing the quantity of physical servers traditionally required. When first introduced, VMware was essentially free with an ongoing commitment only necessary for technical support.
Over the years, the cost of VMware’s technical support increased gradually. However, in November 2023 the cost of VMware increased exponentially, when it was acquired by Broadcom, which proceeded to change its licensing model and transitioned it to a subscription service. As a result of this acquisition, VMware’s associated licensing and technical support fees have increased by more than 200 percent.
11 Packet Pg. 288
In light of the significant cost increase, City staff began exploring alternative virtualization platforms; however, none of them have the breadth of features, most notably, automated failover capabilities to support a mirrored datacenter in the event of a disaster. Thus, until such time that alternative solutions develop this feature, VMware remains essential to the City’s datacenter operations.
The use of "piggyback" purchasing allows the City to place orders against a competitively awarded public agency contract. The City is utilizing Sourcewell Contract #121923-CDW, which was competitively solicited and awarded on March 13, 2024. This approach allows the City to leverage the terms and pricing of an existing agreement that satisfies procurement requirements.
City staff finds this Sourcewell contract awarded to CDW Government, LLC provides the most advantageous pricing to subscribe to three years of VMware's virtualization software and technical support for a total amount not to exceed $136,000.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
The annual cost to support this contract will be available in expenditure accounts 1002200- 516101 (General Fund 100) in the amount of $25,000 and 7003700-518203 (Transit Fund 700) in the amount of $15,000 beginning in Fiscal Year 2025-26, contingent upon the appropriation of funds in the annual budget for such fiscal years.
ATTACHMENTS
Sourcewell Contract 121923-CDW (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) 11 Packet Pg. 289
Agenda Item: 12
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: HYDROPOINT DATA SYSTEMS LMD SUBSCRIPTION
AGREEMENT RENEWAL
DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services
PRESENTER: Andrew Adams
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Award a seven-year service agreement to HydroPoint Data Systems, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $2,294,349 for wireless, data management, and warranty services to support the existing weather-based irrigation controller system.
2. Appropriate funds in the amount of $1,897,548 from the Landscape Maintenance District Fund Balance (Fund 357), $381,361 from Areawide Fund Balance (Fund 367), and $15,440 from Transit Fund Balance (Fund 700), for a total of $2,294,349, to the operational accounts identified in Attachment 1, effective July 1, 2025.
3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
BACKGROUND
In 2009, the City of Santa Clarita (City) initiated efforts to replace outdated irrigation controllers in the Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMD) with state-of-the-art, weather-based irrigation controllers (WBICs) to support its high standards for water conservation. In Fiscal Year 2009-10, the City conducted a competitive procurement process that resulted in the award of a contract to HydroPoint Data Systems, Inc., (HPDS) for the purchase and installation of the WeatherTRAK system.
The WeatherTRAK system centralizes irrigation management and provides real-time diagnostics and automated rain pause functionality through wireless connectivity across the City’s WBIC network. This system has eliminated the need for the City to maintain standalone weather 12 Packet Pg. 290
devices, communication networks, or customer service systems necessary to support irrigation services to manage over 2,700 acres of irrigated landscaped areas. The City Council previously renewed the contract with HPDS in 2013 and 2018.
WeatherTRAK has since become the standardized irrigation controller for the City’s LMD operations. Over the past five years, through new development and annexations, the system has expanded to include a total of 743 individual controllers deployed throughout the City. Since integrating this technology, the City has achieved substantial water savings and operational efficiencies across its irrigated landscape areas. Santa Clarita was also the first municipality in the United States to implement the largest single deployment of WBICs at the time, helping establish the City as a recognized leader in water conservation and sustainable landscape management practices.
The subscription renewal includes real-time weather data access, advanced reporting tools for monitoring and benchmarking water performance, and integration with meter-based billing systems. These tools allow staff to evaluate irrigation efficiency at the individual controller level and provide access to dedicated technical support and training resources.
A wireless and data management platform is required to operate the WBICs and enable real-time data access that drives the City’s water savings. In 2019, the City Council approved an upgrade from legacy 2G cellular controllers to an LTE platform, which extended cellular service and replacement warranties through June 30, 2025.
Earlier this year, staff engaged HPDS to explore pricing for various multi-year subscription options, including associated warranty coverage for all existing smart controllers. Multiple term lengths were considered to evaluate overall value and potential cost savings. The table below outlines the proposed multi-year subscription options, including discounted pricing for longerterm agreements and inclusive of all communication and warranty services for 743 controllers:
Term
(Years)
Multi-Year
Discount
Annual
Cost/
Controller
Monthly
Cost/
Controller
Daily
Cost/
Controller
Common
End Date
Proposed
Renewal
Amount
1 00.00% $572.43 $47.70 $1.57 6/30/2026 $425,316
3 10.00% $507.28 $42.27 $1.39 6/30/2028 $1,130,725
5 20.00% $469.79 $39.15 $1.29 6/30/2030 $1,745,252
7 23.00% $441.14 $36.76 $1.21 6/30/2032 $2,294,349
Due to the savings associated with the seven-year agreement, staff recommends approval of a seven-year agreement with HPDS, in the amount of $2,294,349, to continue providing wireless and data management services for the City’s WeatherTRAK WBIC system. The proposed agreement secures a favorable rate for any new controllers added during the term and includes an extended seven-year parts warranty on all existing controllers - regardless of age - through June 30, 2032. Unlike prior renewals, where warranties came standard due to the newer age of equipment, this renewal includes the proactive purchase of an extended warranty. Staff evaluated the historical cost of repairs previously covered under warranty and determined that purchasing extended coverage is a cost-effective strategy. Notably, HPDS initially declined to offer a 12 Packet Pg. 291
warranty term beyond five years, but staff successfully negotiated a seven-year warranty at the cost of a five-year term. The value of this extended warranty is approximately $764,803 of the total $2,294,349 agreement amount.
The proposed pricing reflects a 23 percent multi-year discount offered by HPDS for long-term commitments as part of its standard subscription model. The agreement includes prepayment for the seven-year subscription service, extended warranty, and performance management services.
While the annual per-controller subscription cost reflects an approximate 16 percent increase over the previous renewal, this amount was negotiated down from HPDS’s original proposal and accounts for broader cost escalations in technology, labor, and wireless communications over the past five years. The inclusion of extended warranty protection and pricing stability over the seven-year term ensures continued operational efficiencies and safeguards the City’s investment in water-saving technology.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
Upon approval of the recommended actions, appropriations from the Landscape Maintenance District Fund (Fund 357), the Areawide Fund (Fund 367), and the Transit Fund (Fund 700) will be made available to the expenditure accounts identified in Attachment 1; appropriations effective Fiscal Year 2025-26.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I: Appropriations
HydroPoint Service Renewal Proposal (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) 12 Packet Pg. 292
Zone/Facility Fund Key Object
Single Zone
Controllers
Shared
Controllers Total
Z T01 357 3572411 516128 1 0 $ 3,087.95
Z T02 357 3572412 516128 14 5 $ 48,635.28
Z T03 357 3572413 516128 12 3 $ 39,371.42
Z T04 357 3572414 516128 10 3 $ 34,739.49
Z T05 357 3572415 516128 18 2 $ 57,899.14
Z T06 357 3572416 516128 4 1 $ 13,895.79
Z T07 357 3572417 516128 16 1 $ 50,951.24
Z T08 357 3572418 516128 36 1 $ 112,710.33
Z T17 357 3572419 516128 3 0 $ 9,263.86
Z T23 357 3572420 516128 41 1 $ 128,150.10
Z T23A 357 3572421 516128 31 0 $ 95,726.58
Z T23B 357 3572422 516128 9 0 $ 27,791.59
Z T29 357 3572423 516128 2 0 $ 6,175.91
Z T31 357 3572424 516128 12 0 $ 37,055.45
Z T46 357 3572425 516128 83 1 $ 257,072.19
Z T47 357 3572426 516128 41 0 $ 126,606.12
Z T52 357 3572427 516128 19 1 $ 60,215.11
Z 03 357 3572430 516128 1 1 $ 4,631.93
Z 04 357 3572431 516128 2 1 $ 9,263.86
Z 05 357 3572432 516128 8 0 $ 24,703.63
Z 06 357 3572433 516128 2 0 $ 6,175.91
Z 07 357 3572434 516128 8 0 $ 24,703.63
Z 15 357 3572435 516128 10 1 $ 31,651.53
Z 16 357 3572436 516128 5 4 $ 21,615.68
Z 17 357 3572437 516128 1 0 $ 3,087.95
Z 18 357 3572438 516128 14 3 $ 50,951.24
Z 19 357 3572439 516128 5 2 $ 17,755.74
Z 20 357 3572440 516128 4 1 $ 13,895.79
Z 21 357 3572441 516128 9 2 $ 30,879.54
Z 24 357 3572444 516128 1 2 $ 6,175.91
Z 25 357 3572445 516128 1 0 $ 3,087.95
Z 26 357 3572446 516128 9 1 $ 28,563.58
Z 27 357 3572447 516128 16 2 $ 52,495.22
Z 28 357 3572448 516128 13 2 $ 43,231.36
Z T51 357 3572449 516128 28 0 $ 86,462.72
Z T65 357 3572450 516128 5 0 $ 15,439.77
Z T65A 357 3572451 516128 5 2 $ 18,527.73
Z T33 357 3572452 516128 4 0 $ 12,351.82
Z T20 357 3572453 516128 15 2 $ 49,407.27
Z T44 357 3572454 516128 11 0 $ 33,967.50
Z T48 357 3572455 516128 7 0 $ 21,615.68
Z T62 357 3572456 516128 5 0 $ 15,439.77
Z T67 357 3572457 516128 9 0 $ 27,791.59
Z T71 357 3572458 516128 4 0 $ 12,351.82
Z 29 357 3572459 516128 2 0 $ 6,175.91
Z 30 357 3572460 516128 1 0 $ 3,087.95
Z 31 357 3572461 516128 6 0 $ 18,527.73
Z T69 357 3572462 516128 20 0 $ 61,759.08
Z T68 357 3572463 516128 6 0 $ 18,527.73
Z 32 357 3572464 516128 2 0 $ 6,175.91
Z T2A 357 3572465 516128 0 5 $ 7,719.89
Areawide 367 3672400 516128 102 40 $ 381,361.35
Metro SC & Jan Heidt 700 7002407 516128 2 0 $ 6,175.91
Transit/TMF 700 7003701 516128 2 0 $ 6,175.91
Vista Canyon Metro 700 7007407 516128 1 0 $ 3,087.95
$ 2,294,349.00
Recommended Appropriations by Account
July 1, 2025
12.a
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Attachment I: Appropriations [Revision 1] (HYDROPOINT DATA SYSTEMS SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL)
Agenda Item: 13
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: RESOLUTIONS INITIATING THE ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services
PRESENTER: Andrew Adams
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council adopt resolutions initiating proceedings for the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2025-26 for the Landscape and Lighting District, Drainage Benefit Assessment Areas, the Golden Valley Ranch Open Space Maintenance District, and the Open Space Preservation District.
BACKGROUND
This agenda item addresses the required procedural steps for adopting resolutions that initiate proceedings for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Annual Levy of Special Districts, ensuring the continued provision of essential services across various zones.
The City of Santa Clarita (City), under the authority granted by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (1972 Act) and Proposition 218 of the California Constitution, annually levies and collects special assessments for the following Special Districts:
1. Landscape and Lighting District (LLD), encompassing various zones;
2. Drainage Benefit Assessment Areas (DBAA), including specified areas;
3. Golden Valley Ranch Open Space Maintenance District (GVROSMD); and
4. Open Space Preservation District (OSPD).
The City has retained Willdan Financial Services (Willdan) for the purpose of assisting with the annual levy of assessments for these districts. Pending the adoption of these resolutions, Willdan is directed to prepare an Engineer’s Report concerning the installation, construction, or 13 Packet Pg. 294
maintenance of any authorized improvements in accordance with Article 4, commencing with Section 22565, of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act.
Subsequent to this action, the City Council will consider the adoption of resolutions declaring the City’s intention to levy assessments for FY 2025-26 at their regular meeting of May 27, 2025. At that time, the City Council will also consider preliminary approval of all Engineer’s Reports prepared by Willdan. If approved, a public hearing will be scheduled, ordering the FY 2025-26 levies.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
Special Districts assessments are budgeted, assessed, and collected annually for the provision of various services to the community.
ATTACHMENTS
FY 2026 LLD Initiation Resolution
FY 2026 DBAA Initiation Resolution
FY 2026 GVROSMD Initiation Resolution
FY 2026 OSPD Initiation Resolution
13 Packet Pg. 295
RESOLUTION 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE SANTA CLARITA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF
ASSESSMENTS FOR EACH ZONE WITHIN THE SANTA CLARITA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
WHEREAS, the City Council of Santa Clarita (City Council), California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (Act), desires to initiate proceedings for the Santa Clarita Landscape and Lighting District (District) inclusive of Streetlighting Zones A and B, and Landscaping Zones 1, 2, 3, 3A, 4, 5, 5A, 6, 7, 7A, 8, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, T1, T1B, T2, T2A, T3, T3B, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T17, T20, T23, T23-1, T23-2, T23A, T23B, T29, T31-1, T31-1A, T31-2, T33, T44, T46, T47, T48, T51, T52, T62, T65, T65A, T65B, T67, T68, T69, T71, T76, T77, and 2008-1 (Area-wide Beautification), for the levy and collection of assessments within the District for Fiscal Year 2025-26, and for the purposes provided therefore in the Act; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the annual levy of assessments for the District and to prepare and file a report with the City Clerk in accordance with Article 4, commencing with Section 22565, of Chapter 1 of the Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California, does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Annual Levy Report: The City Council hereby orders Willdan Financial Services, acting as Assessment Engineer, to prepare and file with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Report concerning the installation, construction, or maintenance of any authorized improvements under the Act, any proposed new improvements or any substantial changes in existing improvements, and the levy and collection of the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessments for the District as required by the provisions of the Act.
SECTION 2. Improvements: The installation, construction, or maintenance of any authorized improvements under the Act, including, but not limited to, streetlighting, traffic signals, landscape and irrigation improvements, and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof.
SECTION 3. Adoption: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
13.a
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: FY 2026 LLD Initiation Resolution (FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS (RESOLUTIONS OF INITIATION))
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ____ 2025. ______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
CITY CLERK
DATE: ______________________
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25-___ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the ____ day of ___ 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
CITY CLERK
13.a
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: FY 2026 LLD Initiation Resolution (FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS (RESOLUTIONS OF INITIATION))
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DRAINAGE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT AREA NOS. 3, 6, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24, 33, 35, 2008-1, 2008-2, 2013-1, 2014-1, 2015-1, 2017-1, AND 2017-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 WHEREAS, the City Council of Santa Clarita (City Council), California, formed special maintenance districts pursuant to the terms of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Chapter 6.4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code commencing with Section 54703 (Act), desires to initiate proceedings for Santa Clarita Drainage Benefit Assessment Area Nos. 3, 6, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24, 33, 35, 2008-1, 2008-2, 2013-1, 2014-1, 2015-1, 2017-1, and 2017- 2 (Areas) for the levy and collection of assessment within the proposed Areas for Fiscal Year 2025-26, for the purposes provided therefore in the Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the Area, and to prepare and file a report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California, does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Annual Levy Report: The City Council hereby orders Willdan Financial Services, acting as Assessment Engineer, to prepare and file with the City Clerk the Assessment Engineer’s Annual Levy Report concerning drainage improvements proposed to be installed and maintained, and the levy and collection of assessments for the Areas as required by provisions of the Assessment Law.
SECTION 2. Areas Improvements: The maintenance of drainage improvements shall include the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of the improvements.
SECTION 3. Adoption: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ____ 2025.
13.b
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: FY 2026 DBAA Initiation Resolution (FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS (RESOLUTIONS OF
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
CITY CLERK
DATE:______________________
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25- __ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the ____ day of ____ 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
CITY CLERK
13.b
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: FY 2026 DBAA Initiation Resolution (FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS (RESOLUTIONS OF
RESOLUTION NO. 25-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE GOLDEN VALLEY RANCH
OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 WHEREAS, the City Council of Santa Clarita (City Council), California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (Act), desires to initiate proceedings for the Golden Valley Ranch Open Space Maintenance District (District) and for the levy and collection of assessments within the proposed District for Fiscal Year 2025-26, for the purposes provided therefore in the Act; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District and to prepare and file a report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California, does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Annual Levy Report: The City Council hereby orders Willdan Financial Services, acting as Assessment Engineer, to prepare and file with the City Clerk the Assessment Engineer’s Annual Levy Report concerning the installation, construction, or maintenance of any authorized improvements under the Act, and the levy and collection of assessments for the District as required by the provisions of the Assessment Law.
SECTION 2. District Improvements: The installation, construction, or maintenance of any authorized improvements under the Act, including, but not limited to, landscape and irrigation improvements and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof.
SECTION 3. Adoption: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ____ 2025.
13.c
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: FY 2026 GVROSMD Initiation Resolution (FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS (RESOLUTIONS OF
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
CITY CLERK
DATE: ______________________
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25-____ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the ____ day of ____ 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
CITY CLERK
13.c
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: FY 2026 GVROSMD Initiation Resolution (FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS (RESOLUTIONS OF
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF
ASSESSMENTS FOR ALL ZONES WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
WHEREAS, the City Council of Santa Clarita (City Council), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (Act), desires to initiate proceedings for the Open Space Preservation District (District) and for the levy and collection of assessments within the proposed District for Fiscal Year 2025-26, for the purposes provided therefore in the Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District and to prepare and file a report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California, does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Annual Levy Report: The City Council hereby directs Willdan Financial Services, acting as Assessment Engineer, to prepare and file with the City Clerk the Assessment Engineer’s Annual Levy Report concerning the installation, construction, or maintenance of any authorized improvements under the Act, and the levy and collection of assessments for the District as required by the provisions of the Assessment Law.
SECTION 2. District Improvements: The installation, construction, or maintenance of any authorized improvements under the Act, including, but not limited to, landscape and irrigation improvements and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary, or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ____ 2025.
13.d
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: FY 2026 OSPD Initiation Resolution (FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS (RESOLUTIONS OF
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
CITY CLERK
DATE: _____________________
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25-__ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the ____ day of ____ 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
CITY CLERK
13.d
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: FY 2026 OSPD Initiation Resolution (FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS (RESOLUTIONS OF
Agenda Item: 14
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO INCORPORATE SENATE BILL 1, ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017, LOCAL STREETS AND
ROADS, ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION FUNDS
INTO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PRESENTER: Shannon Pickett
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution declaring the incorporation of a list of projects proposed to be funded by Senate Bill 1, Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, Local Streets and Roads, Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation for Fiscal Year 2025-26 into the Capital Improvement Program.
2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
BACKGROUND
On April 28, 2017, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) to address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety needs for California state highways, local streets, and road systems. Funds provided by SB 1 are available to the City of Santa Clarita (City) in the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). The percentage of funds allocated to the City are predetermined by Streets and Highways Code Section 2034(a)(1). The estimated allocation of funds for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 is $6,045,690.
Local Streets and Roads funding is supported by RMRA funding, which includes portions of revenues pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2031 from the following sources:
• An additional 12 cents per gallon increase to the gasoline excise tax effective November 1, 2017.
14 Packet Pg. 304
• An additional 20 cents per gallon increase to the diesel fuel excise tax effective November 1, 2017.
• An additional vehicle registration tax, called “Transportation Improvement Fee,” with rates based on the value of the motor vehicle effective January 1, 2018. • An additional $100 vehicle registration tax on zero emissions vehicles (ZEV) of model year 2020 or later effective July 1, 2020.
• Annual rate increases to these taxes beginning on July 1, 2020, (July 1, 2021, for the ZEV fee) and every July 1 thereafter equal to the change in the California Consumer Price Index.
Senate Bill 1 emphasizes the importance of accountability and transparency. For this reason, California Transportation Commission (CTC) staff, in collaboration with stakeholders, developed Local Streets and Roads Funding Annual Reporting Guidelines. To be eligible for SB 1 and RMRA funding, the guidelines require the City to provide annual project reporting to the CTC, including a list of project(s) proposed to be funded. All proposed projects must be adopted by a resolution of the City Council at a regular public meeting prior to the July 1, 2025, submission deadline.
The 2025-26 Overlay and Slurry Seal Program Design and Construction Project was selected to receive the SB 1 RMRA funds. This project reflects the City's commitment to roadway infrastructure and supports the Santa Clarita 2025 theme of Sustaining Public Infrastructure. The Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 SB 1 Project List is subject to change, as specific roadway segments will be finalized during the design process. Staff anticipates construction will begin in June 2026.
The 2024-25 Overlay and Slurry Seal Program Design and Construction Project list was previously approved by the CTC in 2024 and will continue to utilize SB 1 RMRA funds for FY 2025-26. The project will be in construction this summer and is projected to be completed by the end of 2025.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
Upon approval of the recommended actions, estimated allocations of SB 1 RMRA funds (Fund 267) will be earmarked for the 2025-26 Overlay and Slurry Seal Program. Appropriation of SB 1 RMRA funds will be part of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
14 Packet Pg. 305
1 RESOLUTION NO. 25-_____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THAT IT HAS ADOPTED A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 FUNDED BY SENATE BILL 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017, LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS, ROAD
MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION FUNDS INTO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City of Santa Clarita (City) are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and WHEREAS, the City, will receive an estimated $6,045,690 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2025-26 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the ninth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and WHEREAS, the City has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities/the project list; and WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community’s priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate numerous streets, roads, and bridges, and add active transportation infrastructure throughout the City this year and hundreds of similar projects into the future; and WHEREAS, the 2023 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City streets and roads are in an “at-risk” condition and this revenue will help increase the overall quality of the road system and over the next decade will bring streets and roads into a “good” condition; and
14.a
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Resolution (RESOLUTION TO INCORPORATE SENATE BILL 1 IN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) 2 WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California, does hereby resolve as as follows:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2. The following list of newly proposed projects will be funded in-part or solely with Fiscal Year 2025-26 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:
Project Title: 2025-26 Overlay and Slurry Seal Program Design and Construction; Project Description: Generally, the scope of work to be performed includes, but is not limited to, asphalt resurfacing of various streets Citywide;
Project Location: Citywide. Specific streets were selected from locations identified through the City’s Five-Year Pavement Preservation Program and are identified in the attached Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 SB 1 Project List;
Estimated Project Schedule: Pre-construction: July 2025 – May 2026, Construction: June 2026 – June 2027 based on the component being funded with RMRA funds; and Estimated Project Useful Life: Streets selected for preventative maintenance will have a pavement life expectancy of 3-7 years, and streets selected for rehabilitation will have a life expectancy of 10-15 years.
SECTION 3. The following previously proposed and adopted projects may also utilize Fiscal Year 2025-26 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues in their delivery.
With the relisting of these projects in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund these projects with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:
Project Title: 2024-25 Overlay and Slurry Seal Program Design and Construction; Project Description: Generally, the scope of work to be performed includes, but is not limited to, asphalt resurfacing of various streets Citywide;
Project Location: Citywide. Specific streets were selected from locations identified through the City’s Five-Year Pavement Preservation Program and are identified in the attached Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 SB 1 Project List;
14.a
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Resolution (RESOLUTION TO INCORPORATE SENATE BILL 1 IN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) 3 Estimated Project Schedule: Pre-construction: July 2024 – May 2025, Construction: June 2025 – June 2026 based on the component being funded with RMRA funds; and Estimated Project Useful Life: Streets selected for preventative maintenance will have a pavement life expectancy of 3-7 years, and streets selected for rehabilitation will have a life expectancy of 10-15 years.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of ________ 2025. _____________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
CITY CLERK
DATE:____________________
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25-__ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
14.a
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Resolution (RESOLUTION TO INCORPORATE SENATE BILL 1 IN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) 4 City of Santa Clarita
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 SB 1 Project List
Project Title Project Description
Project
Road Name
(Locations
listed are
projected
estimates
and have
yet to be
finalized)
Project
Location
PreConstruction
Start
Construction
Start
Proposed
Schedule of
Completion
Useful
Life
Min
Useful
Life
Max
2025-26 Overlay
and Slurry Seal
Program Design
and Construction
The Annual Overlay
and Slurry Seal
Program reflects the
City's commitment
to roadway
infrastructure by
resurfacing streets in
need of attention.
Avenue
Scott
From Rye
Canyon
Road to
McBean
Parkway
Jul-25 Jun-26 Jun-27 3 15
2025-26 Overlay
and Slurry Seal
Program Design
and Construction
The Annual Overlay
and Slurry Seal
Program reflects the
City's commitment
to roadway
infrastructure by
resurfacing streets in
need of attention.
McBean
Parkway
From Alegro
Drive to Ave
Navarre
Jul-25 Jun-26 Jun-27 3 15
2025-26 Overlay
and Slurry Seal
Program Design
and Construction
The Annual Overlay
and Slurry Seal
Program reflects the
City's commitment
to roadway
infrastructure by
resurfacing streets in
need of attention.
Rye Canyon
Road
From
Avenue
Stanford to
Avenue
Scott
Jul-25 Jun-26 Jun-27 3 15
2025-26 Overlay
and Slurry Seal
Program Design
and Construction
The Annual Overlay
and Slurry Seal
Program reflects the
City's commitment
to roadway
infrastructure by
resurfacing streets in
need of attention.
Via
Princessa
Sierra
Highway to
Lost Canyon
Road
Jul-25 Jun-26 Jun-27 3 15
2024-25 Overlay
and Slurry Seal
Program Design
and Construction
The Annual Overlay
and Slurry Seal
Program reflects the
City's commitment
to roadway
infrastructure by
resurfacing streets in
need of attention.
Copper Hill
Drive
From
Newhall
Ranch Road
to Avenida
Rancho
Tesoro
Jul-24 Jun-25 Jun-26 3 15
2024-25 Overlay
and Slurry Seal
Program Design
and Construction
The Annual Overlay
and Slurry Seal
Program reflects the
City's commitment
to roadway
infrastructure by
resurfacing streets in
need of attention.
Sierra
Highway
From
Soledad
Canyon
Road to
Skyline
Ranch Road
Jul-24 Jun-25 Jun-26 3 15
14.a
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Resolution (RESOLUTION TO INCORPORATE SENATE BILL 1 IN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM)
Agenda Item: 15
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR SANITATION DISTRICT, ANNEXATION NOS. 1139 AND 1141
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PRESENTER: Amalia Marreh
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Adopt the Santa Clarita Valley Sanitation District's resolutions approving and accepting the negotiated exchange of property tax revenues resulting from Santa Clarita Valley Sanitation District Annexation Nos. 1139 and 1141.
2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
BACKGROUND
The Santa Clarita Valley Sanitation District (District) provides wastewater treatment services within the District’s service area. To provide wastewater treatment service to properties located outside the District’s service area, the boundary must be expanded through the annexation process. As part of this process, a tax-sharing resolution to provide the required funding to the District is adopted by the public agency responsible for providing services to the subject property.
Local agencies receiving an apportionment of the property tax from the annexing area, including cities and utility districts, must determine the percentage of tax revenues to be exchanged between the affected agencies. Listed below are the annual tax increment percentages attributable to the land area involved in the corresponding annexation and to be transferred to the District:
0.9814896 percent for Annexation No. 1139
0.9439545 percent for Annexation No. 1141
15 Packet Pg. 310
For this total, the City of Santa Clarita is contributing the following percentage of its revenues from the annual tax increment for each annexation area:
For the City of Santa Clarita:
Annexation No. 1139: 0.0994096 percent
Annexation No. 1141: 0.0976268 percent
There is a separate tax-sharing resolution for the Santa Clarita Library for each annexation. The following is percentage of revenues from the annual tax increment for each annexation area:
For the Santa Clarita Library:
Annexation No. 1139: 0.0389431 percent
Annexation No. 1141: 0.0392694 percent
The annexations consist of the following (see attached resolutions with corresponding maps):
Annexation No. 1139 – A proposed park identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 2836-002-922 and 2864-003-923, located north of Via Princessa, southeast of Whites Canyon Road (Via Princessa Park).
Annexation No. 1141 – One existing single-family home identified by APN 2840-011-024, located at 27829 Sand Canyon Road.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
x
FISCAL IMPACT
Tax-sharing resolutions direct a small portion of property tax revenue to the service-providing agency. The associated revenue does not impact the City's budget.
ATTACHMENTS
Sanitation District Resolution and Map for City of Santa Clarita - Annexation SCV-1139 Sanitation District Resolution and Map for City of Santa Clarita - Annexation SCV-1141 Sanitation District Resolution and Map for Santa Clarita Library - Annexation SCV-1139 Sanitation District Resolution and Map for Santa Clarita Library - Annexation SCV-1141 15 Packet Pg. 311
15.a
Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for City of Santa Clarita - Annexation SCV-1139 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.a
Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for City of Santa Clarita - Annexation SCV-1139 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.a
Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for City of Santa Clarita - Annexation SCV-1139 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.a
Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for City of Santa Clarita - Annexation SCV-1139 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.a
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for City of Santa Clarita - Annexation SCV-1139 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.b
Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for City of Santa Clarita - Annexation SCV-1141 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.b
Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for City of Santa Clarita - Annexation SCV-1141 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.b
Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for City of Santa Clarita - Annexation SCV-1141 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.b
Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for City of Santa Clarita - Annexation SCV-1141 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.b
Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for City of Santa Clarita - Annexation SCV-1141 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.c
Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for Santa Clarita Library - Annexation SCV-1139 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.c
Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for Santa Clarita Library - Annexation SCV-1139 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.c
Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for Santa Clarita Library - Annexation SCV-1139 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.c
Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for Santa Clarita Library - Annexation SCV-1139 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.c
Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for Santa Clarita Library - Annexation SCV-1139 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.d
Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for Santa Clarita Library - Annexation SCV-1141 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.d
Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for Santa Clarita Library - Annexation SCV-1141 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.d
Packet Pg. 329
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for Santa Clarita Library - Annexation SCV-1141 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.d
Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for Santa Clarita Library - Annexation SCV-1141 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
15.d
Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: Sanitation District Resolution and Map for Santa Clarita Library - Annexation SCV-1141 (TAX-SHARING RESOLUTIONS FOR
Agenda Item: 16
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: PARKS MAINTENANCE YARD IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT P4028 - DESIGN CONTRACT
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PRESENTER: Shannon Pickett
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Extend the current design contract and authorize an increased expenditure authority for design services with Psomas, in the amount of $1,007,695 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $100,770, for a total additional contract amount not to exceed $1,108,465.
2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
BACKGROUND
This design project will provide site improvements and additional amenities to support the Parks and Facility Maintenance operations at the Central Park Yard (Yard), located on a 5.25-acre area in the eastern portion of Central Park. The Yard is the hub for the City of Santa Clarita (City) Parks and Facilities Maintenance divisions. The facility includes staff offices and parking, storage for equipment and supplies, City vehicle parking, and space for maintenance operations.
The existing building was built as part of the initial construction of the Central Park development in 2000. Interior tenant improvements were completed in 2010 to expand office space for the supervisory team, and a portable classroom was transformed into a locker room for field staff.
With the continued growth of staff, City facilities, parks, trails, and open space, the Yard and building spaces need to be expanded to accommodate the current needs.
This design project includes improvements identified through site studies and close engagement with the Parks and Facilities Maintenance divisions. The improvements include a new maintenance building containing workspaces for staff, meeting rooms, maintenance facilities, 16 Packet Pg. 332
gym and locker room facilities, one vehicle and equipment wash bay, and technology upgrades.
Additional site enhancements include improvements to the parking and storage areas, circulation, and drainage. The project site is shown on the attached location map.
This project supports the Sustaining Public Infrastructure theme of the City’s five-year strategic plan, Santa Clarita 2025.
The City conducted a Request for Proposal (RFP) to solicit proposals from qualified firms to provide professional engineering services to design the Parks Maintenance Yard Improvements project, including concept design, final design, and construction support. The RFP was published and circulated via the City’s e-procurement system BidNet on January 31, 2023. Firms were evaluated based on the entire scope of services. The City Council awarded a design contract for concept design and studies for a total amount not to exceed $298,447 to Psomas at the May 9, 2023, City Council meeting. Psomas is the Engineer of Record for the project.
In order to provide appropriate final design and bid support, it is recommended that the existing contract with Psomas be increased by a total of $1,108,465, including contingency. This increase will allow Psomas to provide architectural, engineering, and landscape design services required to prepare construction documents, technical specifications, and detailed cost estimates and provide bid assistance to support the proposed site improvements based on previously completed site investigations and concept studies. The proposal is available in the City Clerk’s Reading File.
The requested contingency will cover the costs of unforeseen design constraints and account for potential design modifications requested by the City and other permitting agencies during the design of the project. This includes potential adjustments to the civil drawings, engineering and landscape drawings, architectural drawings, engineered grades, and change orders for additional work requested by the City.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adequate funds are available in project expenditure account P4028723-516101 (Facilities Fund) to support the recommended contract.
ATTACHMENTS
Location Map
Proposal for Psomas (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) 16 Packet Pg. 333
Site Location
Proposed Building
Existing Building
16.a
Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: Location Map (PARKS MAINTENANCE YARD IMPROVEMENTS - DESIGN CONTRACT)
Agenda Item: 17
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: 2025 ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING SERVICES
CONTRACTS
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
PRESENTER: Andy Olson
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Award three-year contracts to Chambers Group, Inc.; Dudek; EcoTierra Consulting; HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc.; Kimley-Horn; Michael Baker International, Inc.; PlaceWorks, Inc.; and SWCA Environmental Consultants to provide on-call California Environmental Quality Act services, for a combined total contract amount not to exceed $1,500,000.
2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute up to two additional one-year renewal options, for a total contract amount not to exceed $500,000 between all contactors per year.
3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
BACKGROUND
EXISTING CONTRACTS
On May 26, 2020, the City Council awarded on-call contracts to five consulting firms to provide on-call California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) services for the City of Santa Clarita (City). The Planning division regularly manages development projects, which require CEQA review, and these contracts were established to streamline the procurement process for these services. This allows staff to work with pre-approved consultants rather than going through a procurement process each time a project requires environmental services that do not necessitate an environmental impact report (EIR).
17 Packet Pg. 335
The City Council originally authorized $500,000 in expenditure authority over three years, with the option for two one-year extensions, to be utilized as necessary for as-needed environmental work. The City Council subsequently authorized two increases in expenditure authority, on June 8, 2021, and September 27, 2022, for a final total of $2,500,000 of expenditure authority over the life of the contracts.
The 2020-2025 on-call CEQA services program was highly successful, resulting in substantial time and process savings for City staff, City projects, and development projects. To date, the oncall program has been used in support of 25 entitlement applications and implementation projects managed by the Planning division, including projects such as the MetroWalk Specific Plan, Riverview Mixed-Use Project, Golden Triangle Multifamily Project, Pacific Industrial Project, Creekside Commons Affordable Housing Project, and Vista Canyon habitat mitigation.
In addition, several City projects have utilized the on-call program to expedite the procurement process and receive necessary environmental planning services and expert advice. These projects include the West Creek Park Playground, Central Park Expansion and Mitigation Monitoring, Via Princessa Park, Blue Cloud Bike Park, Valencia Glen Park Play Area, and Old Orchard Park. 2025 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
The existing on-call program has provided a streamlined contracting process and enhanced customer service. In order to continue to provide these benefits, the City conducted a Request for Proposal (RFP) to solicit proposals from qualified consulting firms. The RFP was published and circulated via the City's e-procurement system, BidNet, on February 13, 2025. The City transmitted the solicitation to 3,988 vendors on BidNet, of which 115 vendors downloaded the RFP. Twenty-one companies provided proposals for consideration.
These proposals were reviewed and evaluated based on each company's ability to meet the specific needs of the City. An evaluation panel comprised of staff from Public Works and Community Development scored the responses using the following categories of weighted criteria:
• Contractor qualifications to provide services described in scope of work • Experience on similar projects
• Thoroughness of proposal, approach to providing sound services, including Program Management and Quality Assurance/Quality Control, and ability to provide services to meet objectives and standards
• Project manager and team's ability to complete scope of services, including adequate technical expertise and workload capacity
The evaluation team scored the responses based on a 100-point system, with the results outlined below:
17 Packet Pg. 336
RANK FIRM LOCATION SCORE
1 Michael Baker International, Inc. Long Beach, CA 95
1 Dudek Pasadena, CA 95
3 SWCA Environmental Consultants Pasadena, CA 94
4 HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. La Mesa, CA 93
5 Chambers Group, Inc. Costa Mesa, CA 87
6 PlaceWorks, Inc. Los Angeles, CA 86
7 EcoTierra Consulting Los Angeles, CA 83
8 Kimley-Horn Santa Clarita, CA 82
9 Impact Sciences Los Angeles, CA 79
10 LSA Associates, Inc. Irvine, CA 78
11 Psomas Pasadena, CA 77
11 EPD Solutions Irvine, CA 77
13 CSG Consultants, Inc. Orange, CA 76
14 Tetra Tech Pasadena, CA 74
15 ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. San Francisco, CA 74
16 Stantec Pasadena, CA 72
16 UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. Irvine, CA 72
18 Interwest Consulting Group Irvine, CA 69
19 Precision Civil Engineering Fresno, CA 68
19 Willdan Engineering Anaheim, CA 68
21 SummitWest Environmental, Inc. Bend, OR 67
Based on the quality of the comprehensive proposals, prior CEQA experience, technical expertise, experience with similar projects, and references, staff recommends the following firms as the most qualified to provide on-call CEQA consulting services:
• Chambers Group, Inc. • Kimley-Horn
• Dudek • Michael Baker International, Inc.
• EcoTierra Consulting • PlaceWorks, Inc.
• HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. • SWCA Environmental Consultants All selected firms scored 80 or higher in City staff's review of proposals. The proposals from these eight firms are available in the City Clerk's Reading File.
Work will be assigned on a project-by-project basis under this on-call contract. The scope of services under the proposed contracts include:
17 Packet Pg. 337
• Preparation and peer review of technical reports and studies; • Preparation and peer review of environmental documents; • Mitigation monitoring and reporting services;
• Field monitoring services; and
• Expert consultation and agency coordination.
Projects requiring Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) are not reviewed under this contract.
Any project requiring an EIR continues to go through a project-specific RFP process, and the EIR contract would require separate review and approval of the City Council.
The aggregate amount to be awarded to the new on-call program would be $1,500,000 over three years. In addition, the new on-call program would be eligible for two optional one-year, $500,000 renewals.
Staff is recommending awarding contracts to eight firms, an increase from five firms under the existing contracts. This provides staff with additional options for contracting CEQA services.
This larger program will ensure sufficient consulting firms are available to meet the City's needs on the City's timelines. This will also provide a greater selection of options for City projects, ensure a competitive selection process, and flexibility to avoid conflicts of interest.
The actual amount to be awarded to each firm is determined by the number and scope of contracted projects. All CEQA work performed under this contract for developer-submitted projects is paid for by the applicants as part of the standard development process. The on-call contracts may also be used to support City projects, including capital improvement projects that require environmental planning services.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of the on-call contracts would have no fiscal impact. All costs associated with the preparation of environmental documents for development projects requiring CEQA review will be the responsibility of the project applicant. The cost associated with environmental planning services for any City projects will be separately funded through the budget process.
ATTACHMENTS
Request for Proposals for On-Call Environmental Planning Services (available in the City Clerk's Reading File)
Chambers Group Inc. Proposal (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Dudek Proposal (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) EcoTierra Proposal (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) HELIX Proposal (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) 17 Packet Pg. 338
Kimley-Horn Proposal (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Michael Baker International Inc. Proposal (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) PlaceWorks Proposal (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) SWCA Proposal (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) 17 Packet Pg. 339
Agenda Item: 18
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
PRESENTER: Mikaela Manion
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Award a two-year contract to RRM Design Group to create objective design and development standards for multifamily and mixed-use residential projects for a total contract amount not to exceed $250,000.
2. Appropriate funds in the amount of $250,000 to Miscellaneous Grant Fund (Fund 259) Planning Grant expenditure account 2593110-516101 and increase Miscellaneous Grant Fund (Fund 259) revenue account 259-462101 by $250,000.
3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
BACKGROUND
On October 8, 2024, the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), in a form approved by the City Attorney between Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and the City of Santa Clarita (City) for a Subregional Partnership Program (SRP 2.0) for the purposes of receiving Regional Early Action Planning Grants of 2021 (REAP 2.0) funding in the amount of $250,000, to prepare objective design and development standards for multifamily and mixed-use residential projects (Project). The MOU was executed on April 1, 2025, with a minor change described below.
When initially presented to the City Council, the intent was to utilize SCAG’s consultant procurement process and SCAG would administer the contract, while the City would work 18 Packet Pg. 340
directly with the consultant. However, SCAG was unable to procure a consultant. Therefore, the City proceeded with its own procurement process, will administer the contract, and submit costs to SCAG for reimbursement. The contract budget is $250,000 and will be entirely funded by the REAP 2.0 Grant established by SCAG.
This effort will support the implementation of Program HP-2.1 from the City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element, which addresses recent changes in state law aimed at streamlining the review process for housing developments. The Project will establish clear, measurable development standards for housing projects with the goal of eliminating subjective design standards, establish objective design standards for multifamily and mixed-use housing projects, and create predictable outcomes for housing developments per state requirements.
The City conducted a Request for Proposal (RFP) to solicit proposals from qualified consulting firms to create objective design and development standards for multifamily and mixed-use residential development projects. The RFP was published and circulated via the City’s eprocurement system, BidNet, on February 24, 2025. The City transmitted the solicitation to 2,503 vendors on BidNet, of which 101 vendors downloaded the RFP. Six companies provided proposals for consideration.
These proposals were reviewed and evaluated based on each company’s ability to meet the specific needs of the City. An evaluation panel comprised of staff from the Planning division scored the responses using the following categories of weighted criteria:
• Scope of Work and Program Management: thoroughness of proposal, approach to providing sound services, and ability to provide services to meet objectives and standards;
• Experience on similar projects/references;
• Responsiveness to the RFP; and
• Cost.
The evaluation team scored the responses based on a 100-point system, with the results outlined below:
Rank Company Location Score
1 RRM Design Group San Juan Capistrano, CA 100.00
2 Mintier Harnish LP Sacramento, CA 83.00
3 Interwest Consulting Group Irvine, CA 75.00
4 Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. Fresno, CA 70.00
5 Mobius Planning Anaheim, CA 65.00
6 Harmonie Park Development Group LLC Los Gatos, CA 65.00 In reviewing proposals, the evaluation team awarded the highest score to RRM Design Group (RRM). Based on the quality of RRM’s comprehensive proposal, related experience, in-house technical expertise, and professional references, City staff recommends RRM as the firm most qualified to complete the Project. RRM Design Group has written objective design and development standards for over ten cities within California, including Alhambra, Encinitas, and 18 Packet Pg. 341
La Mirada, and has experience implementing them and ensuring these standards are buildable.
RRM Design Group is familiar with the City’s review and development processes, and with the City’s current Community Character & Design Guidelines/architectural requirements, which will be the foundation for the objective design and development standards.
The contract services include:
• Preparation of project management plan and schedule;
• Monthly invoicing and reporting;
• Data collection and preparation of associated technical documents; • Preparing for and conducting stakeholder workshops;
• Preparation of the final Objective Design Standards (including up to four draft versions); • Preparation/refinement of housing development permit applications and checklists; and • Attending public meetings.
Staff has completed a due-diligence review of RRM’s professional references and determined its work history meets the City’s standards. Based on the above, staff recommends awarding the contract to RRM. Adoption of the objective design and development standards will require approval by the City Council and will be presented to the City Council for consideration at a future meeting.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
Upon approval of the recommended actions, budget for the Miscellaneous Grant Planning Expenditure Account (2593110-516101) will increase by $250,000 and Miscellaneous Grant Revenue Account (259-462101) will increase by $250,000.
ATTACHMENTS
RRM Design Group RFP Response File
18 Packet Pg. 342
Santa Clarita
SCAG REAP 2.0 Project
Submitted by RRM Design Group on March 25, 2025
18.a
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
18.a
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) Graphics & Photographs:
This document features images of RRM Design Group and its subconsultant partners' projects, the graphics and photos of which are ŽǁŶĞĚ͕ĐŽƉLJƌŝŐŚƚĞĚ͕ĂŶĚͬŽƌůŝĐĞŶƐĞĚďLJŽƵƌƌĞƐƉĞĐƟǀĞĮƌŵƐ͘^ŽŵĞŝŵĂŐĞƐŵĂLJďĞŵŽĚŝĮĞĚĚƵĞƚŽƉƌŝǀĂĐLJĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐ͘ About RRM Design Group:
ϯϮϯϯϮĂŵŝŶŽĂƉŝƐƚƌĂŶŽ͕^ƚĞ͘ϮϬϱͻ^ĂŶ:ƵĂŶĂƉŝƐƚƌĂŶŽ͕ϵϮϲϳϱͻ;ϵϰϵͿϯϲϭͲϳϵϱϬͻƌƌŵĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘ĐŽŵͻĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƟŽŶͻ >ĞŽŶĂƌĚ'ƌĂŶƚ͕ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚϮϲϵϳϯͻZŽďĞƌƚĂŵĂĐŚŽ͕W
ϳϲϱϵϳͻ^ƚĞǀĞŶtĞďƐƚĞƌ͕>^ϳϱϲϭͻ:Ğī&ĞƌďĞƌ͕W>Ϯϴϰϰ dŚĞǁƌŝƩĞŶĂŶĚŐƌĂƉŚŝĐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĂůĂƌĞƚŚĞĞdžĐůƵƐŝǀĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŽĨZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉ͘dŚĞƵŶĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĞĚƵƐĞŽĨ ĂŶLJƉŽƌƟŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƐĞƚĞdžƚŽƌŐƌĂƉŚŝĐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐǁŝƚŚŽƵƚZZD͛ƐƉƌŝŽƌǁƌŝƩĞŶĐŽŶƐĞŶƚŝƐĞdžƉƌĞƐƐůLJƉƌŽŚŝďŝƚĞĚ͘ΞϮϬϮϱZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉ Proposal For SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................1 References ................................................................. 5 Plan of Study/Scope of Work ........................................ 9 Schedule .................................................................. 19 Program Management ............................................... 23 Personnel, Equipment, and Facilities ............................ 25 Subconsultants .......................................................... 31 Experience on Similar Projects .................................... 33 Statement of Offer and Signature ................................ 49 Appendix - Forms....................................................... 51
18.a
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
18.a
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 1 1
Section One:
Introduction
Proposal for
SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
Rendering:
ŶĂĐĂƉĂŽƵƌƚƐDŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕
sĞŶƚƵƌĂ͕
18.a
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 2 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
18.a
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) /ŶƚƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ | Section 1 3
Re: SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
Dear Ms. Abston,
The City of Santa Clarita has long set a high standard for quality design, and RRM Design Group is proud to have supported that vision for the past twenty years. I was honored to assist in the development of the City’s original design guidelines document in 2001 and the current Community Character and Design Guidelines revised in 2008. Our team has also worked ĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƟǀĞůLJǁŝƚŚŝƚLJƐƚĂīƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶĨŽƌŶĞǁĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĚĞƐŝŐŶ ƌĞǀŝĞǁƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͘tŚŝůĞƚŚĞƐĞƚŽŽůƐŚĂǀĞƐĞƌǀĞĚƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJǁĞůů͕ƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƟǀĞŶĂƚƵƌĞŽĨ guidelines can only go so far.
/ƚŝƐƟŵĞƚŽƚĂŬĞƚŚŝƐĐŽŵŵŝƚŵĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞŶĞdžƚůĞǀĞůƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨŽďũĞĐƟǀĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘KďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚƋƵĂŶƟĮĂďůĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚĞŶƐƵƌĞ ĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŚĂƚĨŽƐƚĞƌĚĞƐŝŐŶĞdžĐĞůůĞŶĐĞ͘tĞƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚƚŚĞƉƌŝŵĂƌLJŐŽĂůƐĨŽƌ this project are to:
• Establish clear, measurable design standards for housing projects to create predictable ŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐĨŽƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚƌĞĚƵĐĞŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐƚŽŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ • Implement streamlined and ministerial review processes for qualifying housing projects ;ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚ^ƚĂƚĞůĂǁĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛Ɛ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ůĞŵĞŶƚͿƚŽĂĐĐĞůĞƌĂƚĞŝŶĮůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
•
ŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚƋƵĂůŝĨLJŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂůŝŐŶǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐĞdžƉĞĐƚĂƟŽŶƐĨŽƌŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐƚŚĞ character of the City
tĞĂƌĞĐŽŶĮĚĞŶƚǁĞĐĂŶĞīĞĐƟǀĞůLJĐƌĂŌŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŽŵĞĞƚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐŐŽĂůƐ ĨŽƌĐƌĞĂƟŶŐĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůŚĞůƉƚŽƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĐůĂƌŝƚLJƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐƚŚĞŐƌŽǁŝŶŐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐĂŶĚƌĞĐĞŶƚůĞŐŝƐůĂƟǀĞ ĐŚĂŶŐĞƐ͘DŽƌĞŽǀĞƌ͕ǁĞŚĂǀĞǁƌŝƩĞŶĂǁĂƌĚͲǁŝŶŶŝŶŐŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌĂŶƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ͘tĞŚĂǀĞŚĞůƉĞĚĐŝƟĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐWĂƐĂĚĞŶĂĂŶĚtĞƐƚ,ŽůůLJǁŽŽĚ ĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞ͕ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞ͕ĂŶĚƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞƚŚĞŝƌĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶĂŶĚƉĞƌŵŝƫŶŐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͘tĞŚĂǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚ ĂŶĚĞŶƟƚůĞĚŚƵŶĚƌĞĚƐŽĨĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞĂŶĚŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƵŶŝƚƐƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶďƵŝůƚŝŶ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͘tĞƐŚĂƌĞŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐĚĞƐŝƌĞƚŽƉƌŽŵŽƚĞŚŝŐŚͲƋƵĂůŝƚLJĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞǁŚŝůĞďĞŝŶŐ ƐĞŶƐŝƟǀĞƚŽƚŚĞŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ͛ƐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐĂŶĚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͘KƵƌ work will provide clear standards that will be easy for applicants to understand and apply to ƚŚĞŝƌƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĨŽƌƐƚĂīƚŽƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĞ͕ǁŚŝĐŚǁŝůůƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶ added certainty and transparency in the process.
ƚZZD͕ƚŚŝƐũŽďŵĂƩĞƌƐ͘/ƚŝƐƚŚĞƚLJƉĞŽĨƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĂƚŐĞƚƐƵƐŽƵƚŽĨďĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŵŽƌŶŝŶŐ͘ īŽƌĚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJĂŶĚŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͕ĂŶĚ ĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƟŽŶǁŝƚŚŝƚLJƐƚĂīĂƌĞǁŚĂƚŬĞĞƉƵƐŝŶƐƉŝƌĞĚĂŶĚĞdžĐŝƚĞĚĂďŽƵƚƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘ KƵƌƚĞĂŵŝƐĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞƚŽďĞŐŝŶǁŽƌŬŝŵŵĞĚŝĂƚĞůLJĂŶĚŝƐĨƵůůLJĐŽŵŵŝƩĞĚƚŽĚĞĚŝĐĂƟŶŐƟŵĞ͕ŬĞLJ ƉĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů͕ĂŶĚƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͛ƐĚƵƌĂƟŽŶ͘/ĨLJŽƵŶĞĞĚŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶŽƌŚĂǀĞĂŶLJ ƋƵĞƐƟŽŶƐƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐŽƵƌĐĂƉĂďŝůŝƟĞƐŽƌƚŚĞĐŽŶƚĞŶƚƐŽĨƚŚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĂů͕ƉůĞĂƐĞƌĞĂĐŚŽƵƚƚŽ:Ăŵŝ tŝůůŝĂŵƐĂƚ:tŝůůŝĂŵƐΛƌƌŵĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘ĐŽŵ
Sincerely,
RRM Design Group
:ĂŵŝtŝůůŝĂŵƐ <ĂƚũĂŝůůŵĂŶŶ͕/W͕:
WƌŝŶĐŝƉĂůͲŝŶͲŚĂƌŐĞ WƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ
March 25, 2025
Jaclyn Abston
City of Santa Clarita
23920 Valencia Blvd.,
Suite 300
Santa Clarita, CA, 91355
RRM Design Group
32332 Camino Capistrano,
Ste 205
San Juan Capistrano, CA
92675
p: (949) 361-7950
18.a
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
18.a
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 5 2
Section Two:
References
Proposal for
SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
Rendering:
&ƌŽŶƚ^ƚƌĞĞƚDŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕
sĞŶƚƵƌĂ͕
18.a
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 6 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project RRM’s Relevant Experience
&ŽƌϱϬLJĞĂƌƐ͕ZZDŚĂƐƐĞƌǀĞĚůŽĐĂůũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƟŽŶƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͕ƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐƉŽůŝĐLJƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕ƵƌďĂŶ ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚůĂŶĚƵƐĞƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞĂĚǀĂŶĐĞĚƵƐĞĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕ƐƚĂƚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐůĂǁƐ͕ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝŶĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŶĞĞĚƐĂŶĚĚĞƐŝƌĞƐ͘KƵƌŐĞŶĞƌĂů ƉůĂŶĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƉůĂŶƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĮĐĂŶĚŵĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶƐ͕ƵƌďĂŶĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚƵĚŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐĂŶĚŽǀĞƌůĂLJ njŽŶĞƐĚƌĂǁĨƌŽŵůŽĐĂůĂŶĚƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůĐŽŶƚĞdžƚĂŶĚŝŶŇƵĞŶĐĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĐŽŶƚĞdžƚͲƐĞŶƐŝƟǀĞƵƌďĂŶĂŶĚƌƵƌĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶ ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐĂŶĚŐƵŝĚĂŶĐĞ͘dŚĞLJĨŽƐƚĞƌŝŶĮůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ƌĞĚƵĐĞǀĞŚŝĐůĞŵŝůĞƐƚƌĂǀĞůĞĚ͕ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĂīŽƌĚĂďŝůŝƚLJ͕ĂŶĚĂĚǀĂŶĐĞĞƋƵŝƚLJ͘
ZZD͛ƐŵƵůƟͲĚŝƐĐŝƉůŝŶĞƚĞĂŵ͛ƐĞdžƚĞŶƐŝǀĞĂŶĚŽŶŐŽŝŶŐǁŽƌŬŝŶďŽƚŚƚŚĞƉƌŝǀĂƚĞĂŶĚƉƵďůŝĐƐĞĐƚŽƌƐ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂďĂůĂŶĐĞŽĨƉƌĂĐƟĐĞƚŚĂƚŵĂŬĞƐŽƵƌƉůĂŶƐĐƌĞĂƟǀĞLJĞƚƌĞĂůŝƐƟĐĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶͲŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚ͘ ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶƐĂƌĞƚƌƵƚŚƚĞƐƚĞĚŝŶͲŚŽƵƐĞďLJŽƵƌĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůƉƌĂĐƟĐĞĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƌƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐŽĨĚĞƐŝŐŶ ĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ͕ĂŶĚŽƵƌƉƌĂĐƟƟŽŶĞƌƐĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚ͞ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ͟ĐĂŶŵĂŬĞŝƚ͞ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ͘͟dŚŝƐƐĞƚƐZZDĂƉĂƌƚ ĨƌŽŵŽƚŚĞƌĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚƐĂŶĚǁŝůůƐĞƌǀĞLJŽƵǁĞůůŝŶƚŚĞĚĞƐŝƌĞƚŽĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƚĞǁŝƚŚĂĮƌŵƚŚĂƚǁŝůů͙ • Establish clear, measurable design standards for housing projects to create predictable outcomes for ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚƌĞĚƵĐĞŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐƚŽŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ • Implement streamlined and ministerial review processes for qualifying housing projects (consistent with ^ƚĂƚĞůĂǁĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛Ɛ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ůĞŵĞŶƚͿƚŽĂĐĐĞůĞƌĂƚĞŝŶĮůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
•
ŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚƋƵĂůŝĨLJŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂůŝŐŶǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐĞdžƉĞĐƚĂƟŽŶƐĨŽƌŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐƚŚĞĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŽĨƚŚĞŝƚLJ • >ĞǀĞƌĂŐĞĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŽĨĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌŽǀĞƌϮϬĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ KƵƌƉůĂŶŶĞƌƐĂŶĚƵƌďĂŶĚĞƐŝŐŶĞƌƐĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƚĞŝŶƚĞƌŶĂůůLJǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝŶͲŚŽƵƐĞƚĞĂŵŽĨĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƐ͕ĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚ ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƐƚŽŐŝǀĞƵƐĂŶĂĚǀĂŶƚĂŐĞŝŶǁƌŝƟŶŐƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚƉůĂŶƐƚŚĂƚŐŽďĞLJŽŶĚƐŚĞůĨĂƌƚ͖ƚŚĞLJĂƌĞ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂďůĞĂŶĚƉƌŽĚƵĐĞƌĞƐƵůƚƐ͘ďŽǀĞĂůů͕ŽƵƌƉůĂŶƐĂƌĞƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚŝŶĂƚƌƵůLJŝŶĐůƵƐŝǀĞĂŶĚĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƟǀĞ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͕ĞŵďƌĂĐŝŶŐƚŚĞƵŶŝƋƵĞĂƩƌŝďƵƚĞƐƚŚĂƚƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƚŚĞǀĂůƵĞƐĂŶĚĐƵůƚƵƌĞŽĨĞĂĐŚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ Affordable Housing Policy, Analysis, and Program Development ZZD͛ƐƚĞĂŵŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĞdžƉĞƌƚƐŝŶŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉŽůŝĐLJ͕ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ͘tĞŬŶŽǁǁŚĂƚŝƐ ĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ͕ĂŶĚǁĞƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚƚŚĞƌĞĂůŝƟĞƐƚŚĂƚĐĂŶŝŵƉĞĚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ͘&ƌŽŵĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐĞĂƐLJͲƚŽͲ ƵƐĞĂŶĚĞĂƐLJͲƚŽͲĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚĞƌĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŽĚĞƐŝŐŶŝŶŐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐƚŚĂƚĨƵůĮůůLJŽƵƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ŶĞĞĚƐ͕ŽƵƌƚĞĂŵŝƐĚƌŝǀĞŶďLJƚŚĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŽĨƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĨŽƌĂůů͘KƵƌĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŽŶďŽƚŚƐŝĚĞƐŽĨƚŚĞ counter gives us unique insight into how standards and the necessary developer requirements can yield quality housing projects. This unique ability ĂůůŽǁƐƵƐƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƚƌƵƚŚͲƚĞƐƚĞĚďLJ architects.
tĞŚĂǀĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚŚƵŶĚƌĞĚƐŽĨĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ͕
ŵƵůƟͲĨĂŵŝůLJ͕ƐĞŶŝŽƌ͕ĂŶĚŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƵŶŝƚƐĂŶĚ
ŚĂǀĞƉĂƌƚŶĞƌĞĚǁŝƚŚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ͕ĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚ
ŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƟŽŶƐƚŽĐƌĂŌKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚ
ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌĨƵƚƵƌĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
throughout the state. In a state where housing is scarce, ZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉŽīĞƌƐƚŚĞŝĚĞĂƐĂŶĚƋƵĂůŝĮĐĂƟŽŶƐƚŽ
ĐƌĞĂƚĞƚƌƵůLJĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ͕ůŝǀĂďůĞ͕ĂŶĚƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘ KƵƌŵƵůƟͲĚŝƐĐŝƉůŝŶĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚŵĞĂŶƐŽƵƌĚĞƐŝŐŶƐĂƌĞ
ĨƵŶĐƟŽŶĂůĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂďůĞ͕ƚƌĂŶƐĨŽƌŵŝŶŐĐůŝĞŶƚĚƌĞĂŵƐ into wonderfully livable places.
18.a
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) References | Section 2 7
We love being a 100% employee-owned design firm,
and we plan on doing this for the next 50 years
ůůŽĨƵƐĂƚZZDƚŚƌŝǀĞŽŶŽƵƌƉĂƐƐŝŽŶĨŽƌĐƌĂŌŝŶŐĞŶũŽLJĂďůĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚƐ͕Ă ĐŽŵŵŝƚŵĞŶƚƚŚĂƚŚĂƐĨƵĞůĞĚŽƵƌƐƵĐĐĞƐƐĨŽƌĮŌLJLJĞĂƌƐ͘&ƌŽŵƚŚĞŝŶĐĞƉƟŽŶ ŽĨ ŽƵƌ ũŽƵƌŶĞLJ ƚŽ ŽƵƌ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ƐƚĂƚĞ ŽĨ ĞdžƉĂŶƐŝŽŶ͕ ŽƵƌ ƚĞĂŵ ŽĨ ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƐ͕ landscape architects, engineers, surveyors, and planners collaborates closely ǁŝƚŚ ĐůŝĞŶƚƐ ƚŽ ƐŚĂƉĞ ŽƵƌ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ͘ tŚĞƚŚĞƌ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ŝƐ ƉƵďůŝĐ Žƌ ƉƌŝǀĂƚĞ͕ĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůŽƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů͕ǁĞĞdžĐĞůŝŶĂƩĞŶƟǀĞůŝƐƚĞŶŝŶŐ͕ƚŚŽƵŐŚƞƵů ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ ĂŶĚ ƟŵĞůLJ͕ ďƵĚŐĞƚͲĐŽŶƐĐŝŽƵƐ ĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJͶǀĂůƵĞƐǁĞ͛ǀĞ ƵƉŚĞůĚ ƐŝŶĐĞ our establishment in 1974.
We want to be known as friendly, helpful, and
collaborative design professionals
tĞĨĞĞůƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐĐůŝĞŶƚƋƵŽƚĞƐƵŵƐƵƉƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŽĨǁŽƌŬŝŶŐǁŝƚŚZZD͗ ͞ZZDǁĂƐĞƋƵĂůůLJĂƩĞŶƟǀĞĂŶĚƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝǀĞƚŽŝƐƐƵĞƐďŽƚŚůĂƌŐĞĂŶĚ ƐŵĂůů͕ƌĞĂůĂŶĚŝŵĂŐŝŶĞĚ͘/ǁĂƐĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚůLJŝŵƉƌĞƐƐĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƌĐĂůŵ͕ ŝŶĨŽƌŵĞĚŵĂŶŶĞƌĂŶĚĂƩĞŶƟŽŶƚŽĚĞƚĂŝůƐ͘͟
tĞ͛ƌĞĚŽŝŶŐ
an incredible
amount of work:
2,300+
ZZDƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝŶ
ƚŚĞůĂƐƚĚĞĐĂĚĞ
Our clients enjoy
ƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŽĨ
working with us:
8.5 NPS
;KǀĞƌĂůůEĞƚ
WƌŽŵŽƚĞƌ^ĐŽƌĞͿ
ǁĞůůĂďŽǀĞ
ŝŶĚƵƐƚƌLJĂǀĞƌĂŐĞ
ŽĨϳ͘Ϯ
Our employees like their
careers at RRM:
“Best Firm
to Work for”
ϮϬϮϮ͕ϮϬϮϯ͕ϮϬϮϰ
ͲǁĞŝŐ'ƌŽƵƉ
7 RRM Offices
Our headquarters are located at:
3765 South Higuera St., Ste. 102
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
p: (805) 543-1794
All offices: San Luis Obispo,
Santa Barbara, San Juan
Capistrano, San Leandro, Ventura,
San Diego, and Seattle
200+ Employees
in 6 Disciplines
• Architects
• Civil Engineers
• Landscape Architects
• Planners & Urban Designers
• Structural Engineers
• Surveyors
100% EmployeeOwned Firm
RRM Design Group is a California
corporation and a 100%
employee-owned company (ESOP),
incorporated November 26, 1974
RRM Design Group Firm Profile
50 Years of Creating Environments People Enjoy
RRM by the Numbers
18.a
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
18.a
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 9 Section Three:
Plan of Study/Scope of Work
Proposal for
SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
WŝĐƚƵƌĞĚ͗
ĂƐĂĚĞůĂƐ&ƵĞŶƚĞƐīŽƌĚĂďůĞ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕
^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂ͕
3 18.a
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 10 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Plan of Study/Scope of Work
ZZDƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŝƚLJĚĞƐŝƌĞƐƚŽĐŽŶƟŶƵĞƌĞĮŶŝŶŐĂŶĚƚĂŝůŽƌŝŶŐŝƚƐĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚ ƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂŶĂƩƌĂĐƟǀĞĂŶĚĂĞƐƚŚĞƟĐĂůůLJƉůĞĂƐŝŶŐĐŝƚLJĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͘tĞƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚƚŚĞƉƌŝŵĂƌLJŐŽĂůƐĨŽƌƚŚŝƐ project are:
• Establish clear, measurable design standards for housing projects to create predictable outcomes for ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚƌĞĚƵĐĞŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐƚŽŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ • Implement streamlined and ministerial review processes for qualifying housing projects (consistent with ^ƚĂƚĞůĂǁĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛Ɛ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ůĞŵĞŶƚͿƚŽĂĐĐĞůĞƌĂƚĞŝŶĮůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
•
ŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚƋƵĂůŝĨLJŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂůŝŐŶǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐĞdžƉĞĐƚĂƟŽŶƐĨŽƌŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐƚŚĞĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŽĨƚŚĞŝƚLJ dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐĐŽƉĞĚĞůŝǀĞƌƐŽŶǁŚĂƚƚŚĞŝƚLJŚĂƐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚŝŶŝƚƐZ&WĂŶĚŽƵƚůŝŶĞƐŚŽǁǁĞǁŝůůĂĐŚŝĞǀĞ ƚŚĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚƚĂƐŬƐ͘tĞŚĂǀĞĨŽůůŽǁĞĚƚŚĞƐĐŽƉĞĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŝƐƐƵĞĚZ&W͕ĂƚƟŵĞƐ͕ůŝƚĞƌĂůůLJ͕ďLJ ďƌŝŶŐŝŶŐĨŽƌǁĂƌĚƚŚĞŽƌŝŐŝŶĂůůĂŶŐƵĂŐĞŝŶŝƚƐĞŶƟƌĞƚLJĂŶĚ͕ĂƚƟŵĞƐ͕ŝŶƐƉŝƌŝƚ͕ďLJƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚĞƐƚŚĂƚ ǁĞŚĂǀĞĨŽƵŶĚƐƵĐĐĞƐƐĨƵůŝŶŽƚŚĞƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐƚŽƉƌŽĚƵĐĞŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂďůĞĂŶĚƵƐĞĨƵůƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘KƵƌ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐǁŝůůĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĐŽŵƉůLJǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝŶƚĞŶƚŽĨ^ƚĂƚĞůĞŐŝƐůĂƟŽŶƚŽĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ƌĞƐƵůƟŶŐŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞĐŽŵƉĂƟďůĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐĂŶĚƌĂŝƐĞƚŚĞ bar on community design. RRM Design Group (RRM) will perform the following Tasks:
Task 1: Project Management and Coordination
Task 1.1: Project Kick-Off Meeting
tŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĮƌƐƚŵŽŶƚŚŽĨƚŚĞEŽƟĐĞƚŽWƌŽĐĞĞĚŝƐƐƵĂŶĐĞ͕ZZDǁŝůůŚŽůĚĂǀŝƌƚƵĂůŬŝĐŬͲŽīŵĞĞƟŶŐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ WƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚdĞĂŵ;WDdͿ͘dŚĞWDdǁŝůůĐŽŶƐŝƐƚŽĨƚŚĞ^'WƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌĂŶĚĞƉƵƚLJWƌŽũĞĐƚ DĂŶĂŐĞƌ͕ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚƐƚĂīƚŽƌĞǀŝĞǁƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǀŝƐŝŽŶĂŶĚŐŽĂůƐ ĂŶĚƚŽĐŽŶĮƌŵƚŚĞĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚĂŶĚĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĞīŽƌƚƐ͘ dŚĞŬŝĐŬͲŽīŵĞĞƟŶŐǁŝůůďĞƵƐĞĚƚŽƌĞǀŝĞǁƚŚĞĚƌĂŌWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶ;WDW͕dĂƐŬϭ͘ϮͿ͕ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĐŽƉĞ ŽĨǁŽƌŬ͕ƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞ͕ĂŶĚďƵĚŐĞƚ͖ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĂƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞĨŽƌƚŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚdĞĂŵŵĞĞƟŶŐƐ;WDd͕dĂƐŬ ϭ͘ϯͿ͖ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJƉŽƚĞŶƟĂůƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌƐƚŽĞŶŐĂŐĞ;dĂƐŬϮ͘ϭͿ͖ĂŶĚĐŽŶĮƌŵĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƟŽŶƉƌŽƚŽĐŽůƐ͘ZZDǁŝůůĂůƐŽ ůĞĂĚĂĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶŽŶĚĂƚĂĐŽůůĞĐƟŽŶĂŶĚŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ;dĂƐŬϭ͘ϲͿ͘ ZZDǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚŚĞŬŝĐŬŽīŵĞĞƟŶŐĂŐĞŶĚĂƚŽŵĞĞƟŶŐĂƩĞŶĚĞĞƐĂƚůĞĂƐƚϰϴŚŽƵƌƐŝŶĂĚǀĂŶĐĞƚŽĂůůŽǁƟŵĞ ƚŽƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚƌĞǀŝƐĞŝƚ͘&ŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞŬŝĐŬͲŽīŵĞĞƟŶŐ͕ZZDǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŵĞĞƟŶŐŶŽƚĞƐĂŶĚŶĞdžƚƐƚĞƉƐ͘ZZD ǁŝůůďĞƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌƉƌĞƉĂƌŝŶŐĂŶĂŐĞŶĚĂ͕ƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕ĂŶĚĂŶLJŚĂŶĚŽƵƚƐĂŚĞĂĚŽĨƚŚĞŬŝĐŬŽī ŵĞĞƟŶŐĂŶĚŵĂŬŝŶŐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞƚŽĂůů͘
Task 1.1 Deliverables:
• ϭ͘ϭ͘ϭ͘WƌŽũĞĐƚŬŝĐŬͲŽīŵĞĞƟŶŐĂŐĞŶĚĂ
• ϭ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘WƌŽũĞĐƚŬŝĐŬͲŽīŵĞĞƟŶŐŶŽƚĞƐĂŶĚůŝƐƚŽĨĂƩĞŶĚĞĞƐ • ϭ͘ϭ͘ϯ͘WƌŽũĞĐƚŬŝĐŬͲŽīƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶĂŶĚĂŶLJŚĂŶĚŽƵƚƐŽƌĂŶLJŽƚŚĞƌƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŽŶĞ ƌĞǀŝƐŝŽŶďĂƐĞĚŽŶĂƐŝŶŐůĞƌĞĚůŝŶĞĚĚƌĂŌŽĨŝƚLJͬ^'ĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ Task 1.2: Project Management Plan and Schedule
dŚĞĨŽƵŶĚĂƟŽŶŽĨZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉ͛ƐƉƌĂĐƟĐĞƌĞůŝĞƐŽŶĞdžƉĞƌƚĂŶĚƉƌŽĂĐƟǀĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ͘ƐƉĂƌƚ ŽĨƚŚŝƐƚĂƐŬ͕ZZDǁŝůůƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶ;WDWͿ͕ǁŚŝĐŚǁŝůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĐŽŶƚĂĐƚŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶ ĨŽƌƚŚĞŬĞLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚĞĂŵ͕ƚŚĞƐĐŽƉĞŽĨǁŽƌŬ͕ƚŚĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞ͕ƚŚĞďƵĚŐĞƚ͕ŝŶǀŽŝĐŝŶŐƉƌŽŐƌĞƐƐ͕ƌĞƉŽƌƟŶŐĚĞƚĂŝůƐ͕ ĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĐŽŶƚƌŽůĂŶĚYͬYƉƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐ͘dŚĞWDWǁŝůůĂůƐŽŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐĂŶĚƟŵĞůŝŶĞƐ͘ dŚĞWDWǁŝůůŝĚĞŶƟĨLJĂƐLJƐƚĞŵĨŽƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŽŶƚƌŽů͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJƉƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐĨŽƌĐŽŶĚƵĐƟŶŐƚŚĞ ǁŽƌŬ͕ŵĂŶĂŐŝŶŐƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕ďƵĚŐĞƚ͕ƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞ͕ŵŽŶŝƚŽƌŝŶŐĂŶĚƌĞƉŽƌƟŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚĂƚƵƐ ĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĞƐƐ͕ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĐŽŶƚƌŽů͕ĂŶĚƋƵĂůŝƚLJĂƐƐƵƌĂŶĐĞͬƋƵĂůŝƚLJĐŽŶƚƌŽů͘dŚĞWDWǁŝůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĂĨĞŐƵĂƌĚƐĨŽƌ ƚŚĞĞĂƌůLJŝĚĞŶƟĮĐĂƟŽŶŽĨŝƐƐƵĞƐĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƌĞīĞĐƟǀĞƌĞƐŽůƵƟŽŶ͘hƉŽŶĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůďLJ^'͕ƚŚĞWDWǁŝůůďĞƚŚĞ
18.a
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) WůĂŶŽĨ^ƚƵĚLJͬ^ĐŽƉĞŽĨtŽƌŬ | Section 3 11
ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚŐƵŝĚŝŶŐƚŚŝƐǁŽƌŬĞīŽƌƚΖƐƉƌŽŐƌĞƐƐ͘ZZDǁŝůůŶŽƟĨLJ^'ĂƐƐǁŝŌůLJĂƐƉŽƐƐŝďůĞĂďŽƵƚĂŶLJƉŽƚĞŶƟĂů ŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJƵƉĚĂƚĞƐƚŽƚŚĞWDW͘ŶLJƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƚŽƚŚĞŽǀĞƌĂůůWDWŵƵƐƚďĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚďLJ^'͘ZZDǁŝůů ĚĞůŝǀĞƌƚŚĞĮƌƐƚĚƌĂŌŽĨƚŚĞWDWƉƌŝŽƌƚŽƚŚĞ<ŝĐŬͲKīDĞĞƟŶŐ͘ZZDǁŝůůƚŚĞŶƵƐĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶŐĂŝŶĞĚĚƵƌŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ<ŝĐŬͲKīŵĞĞƟŶŐƚŽĐĂƉƚƵƌĞĂĐůĞĂƌĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶŽŶĮŶĂůĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐĂŶĚĞŶĚƉƌŽĚƵĐƚƐ͕ƚŽĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĂƐŚĂƌĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJĂŶĚĂůůƚĞĂŵŵĞŵďĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚƌĞĮŶĞƚŚĞWDWĂƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJďĂƐĞĚŽŶ ƚŚĞƐĞĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶƐĂŶĚĂŶLJǁƌŝƩĞŶĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďLJĞŝƚŚĞƌ^'ŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘ ZZDǁŝůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞƐŚŽǁŝŶŐĂůůǁŽƌŬƚĂƐŬƐ͕ƐƵďƚĂƐŬƐ͕ƐƚĂƌƚĚĂƚĞƐ͕ĂĐƟǀŝƚLJĚƵƌĂƟŽŶƐ͕ƉƌŽĚƵĐƚƐƵďŵŝƩĂů ĚĂƚĞƐ͕ŬĞLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚŵŝůĞƐƚŽŶĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƌĞůĂƟŽŶƐŚŝƉƐĂŵŽŶŐǁŽƌŬƚĂƐŬƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĐƌŝƟĐĂůƉĂƚŚŝƚĞŵƐ͘ ĂĐŚƚĂƐŬĂŶĚ
ƐƵďƚĂƐŬĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞǁŝůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚdĞĂŵ;WDdͿĂƐŝƚŝƐĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ͕ĂĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐƚŽ ƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞ͘dŚĞWDdǁŝůůŚĂǀĞĂƚǁŽͲǁĞĞŬƌĞǀŝĞǁƉĞƌŝŽĚĨŽƌĂůůĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐ͘ůůĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĞĚŝƚƐ͕ ƐƵŐŐĞƐƟŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚƋƵĞƐƟŽŶƐƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐƚŚĞWDdǁŝůůďĞƐƵďŵŝƩĞĚƚŽZZDĂƐŽŶĞĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚĞĚƐĞƚŽĨƌĞĚůŝŶĞ edits. RRM will then incorporate the edits into a revised deliverable.
ZZDĞŵƉůŽLJƐĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĚĐƌŝƟĐĂůƉĂƚŚƉƌŽũĞĐƚŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚ͖ƚŚĞƟŵĞůŝŶĞƐŚŽǁŶŽŶƉĂŐĞϮϬ illustrates our structured approach:
• DĂƉƉŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉŚĂƐĞƐĂŶĚŬĞLJĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐŝŶĂĐůĞĂƌ͕ƐĞƋƵĞŶƟĂůŽƌĚĞƌ • ĞĮŶŝŶŐĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶĐŝĞƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞĐƌŝƟĐĂůƉĂƚŚĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐĂƌĞƉƌŝŽƌŝƟnjĞĚ • Including review points and approvals to align with our quality control process dŚŝƐƟŵĞůŝŶĞŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞƐǁŝƚŚŽƵƌŝŶƚĞƌŶĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬ͕ĞŶƐƵƌŝŶŐĞĸĐŝĞŶƚĞdžĞĐƵƟŽŶĂŶĚ adaptability to client needs.
Task 1.2 Deliverables:
• ϭ͘Ϯ͘ϭ͘ƌĂŌĂŶĚ&ŝŶĂůWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶ;WDWͿ
• ϭ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ͘WƌŽũĞĐƚƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞ
Task 1.3: Project Management Meeting
dŚĞZZDWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌǁŝůůĐŽŶĚƵĐƚŵŽŶƚŚůLJĐŚĞĐŬͲŝŶŵĞĞƟŶŐƐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚdĞĂŵ;WDdͿ͕ ǁŚŝĐŚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƚŚĞ^'WD͕ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂWD͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƚĞĂŵŵĞŵďĞƌƐ͕ĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚ͘dŚĞŵĞĞƟŶŐƐ ǁŝůůďĞƵƐĞĚƚŽƵƉĚĂƚĞƚŚĞWDdŽŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉƌŽŐƌĞƐƐ͕ƚŽŝĚĞŶƟĨLJĂŶĚƉůĂŶĨŽƌƵƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƚĂƐŬƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŽĂŶƟĐŝƉĂƚĞ ĂŶLJĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐŽƌĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐ͘ƚƚŚĞďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚŝƐǁŽƌŬĞīŽƌƚ͕ĂƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐĚĂƚĞĂŶĚƟŵĞǁŝůůďĞŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ ďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞWDd͛ƐĂǀĂŝůĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽƐŝŵƉůŝĨLJƚŚĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŵŽŶƚŚůLJŵĞĞƟŶŐƐ͘ZZDǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŵĞĞƟŶŐ ĂŐĞŶĚĂƐĂƚůĞĂƐƚϰϴŚŽƵƌƐ;ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJƚǁŽĚĂLJƐͿŝŶĂĚǀĂŶĐĞĂŶĚĨŽůůŽǁƵƉŵĞĞƟŶŐŶŽƚĞƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞ ƚŚĞŶĞdžƚƐƚĞƉƐĂƌĞĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĞĚ͘KŶŐŽŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƟŽŶŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƚĞůĞĐŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ ŵĞĞƟŶŐƐ͕ĐŽƌƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞŶĐĞ͕ƌĞĐŽƌĚŬĞĞƉŝŶŐ͕ĞůĞĐƚƌŽŶŝĐĮůĞŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƟŽŶĂƐ ŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚΖƐĚƵƌĂƟŽŶ͘
Task 1.3 Deliverables:
• ϭ͘ϯ͘ϭ͘DĞĞƟŶŐĂŐĞŶĚĂƐĨŽƌŵŽŶƚŚůLJWDdŵĞĞƟŶŐƐ
• ϭ͘ϯ͘Ϯ͘DĞĞƟŶŐŶŽƚĞƐǁŝƚŚůŝƐƚŽĨĂƩĞŶĚĞĞƐ
• ϭ͘ϯ͘ϯ͘DĞĞƟŶŐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶƐŽƌĂŶLJŚĂŶĚŽƵƚƐĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚ • ϭ͘ϯ͘ϰ͘KŶŐŽŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƟŽŶĂŶĚŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ͘dŚŝƐĂƐƐƵŵĞƐĂŶĂǀĞƌĂŐĞŽĨĞŝŐŚƚ;ϴͿŚŽƵƌƐƉĞƌ month for eighteen (18) months.
Task 1.4: Monthly Invoicing and Reporting
ZZDǁŝůůƉƌĞƉĂƌĞŵŽŶƚŚůLJŝŶǀŽŝĐĞƐĂŶĚƌĞƉŽƌƚƐŝŶĂĐĐŽƌĚĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚ^'ŝŶǀŽŝĐŝŶŐĂŶĚƌĞƉŽƌƟŶŐ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐŝĞƐ͘
ĂĐŚƌĞƉŽƌƚǁŝůůĨŽůůŽǁĂĨŽƌŵĂƚĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚďLJƚŚĞ^'WƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ͘ZZDǁŝůůƚƌĂĐŬĂŶĚ ƌĞƉŽƌƚĐƌŝƟĐĂůƉĂƚŚĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐĂŶĚŵŝůĞƐƚŽŶĞƐĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂŶĚƐƵďŵŝƚŵŽŶƚŚůLJƉƌŽŐƌĞƐƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐƚŽ^'͘ Monthly progress reports will highlight the work performed and deliverables completed during the previous ŵŽŶƚŚ͕ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJĂŶLJŝƐƐƵĞƐĞŶĐŽƵŶƚĞƌĞĚ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐŽůƵƟŽŶ;ƐͿƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐƐĂŝĚĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐ͘/Ĩ^' ŚĂƐĂŶĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚĨŽƌŵĂƚŽƌƚĞŵƉůĂƚĞƚŚĂƚƐŚŽƵůĚďĞƵƐĞĚ͕ZZDǁŝůůĨŽůůŽǁƚŚĂƚĨŽƌŵĂƫŶŐ͘
18.a
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 12 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Each monthly progress report will, at a minimum, include:
• Summary
• WƌŽŐƌĞƐƐŶĂƌƌĂƟǀĞ
• ĞƐĐƌŝƉƟŽŶŽĨƚĂƐŬƐĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ
• WƌŽũĞĐƚƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞĚĞƐĐƌŝďŝŶŐƚŚĞƉĞƌĐĞŶƚĂŐĞŽĨĞĂĐŚƚĂƐŬͬĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞͬŵŝůĞƐƚŽŶĞ • ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJŽĨĐŽƐƚƐŝŶĐƵƌƌĞĚƉĞƌƚĂƐŬͬŵŝůĞƐƚŽŶĞǁŝƚŚŝŶĨŽŽŶƌĞŵĂŝŶŝŶŐĨƵŶĚŝŶŐďLJƚĂƐŬ • ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞĂŶĚƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞƚƌĂĐŬŝŶŐŶĂƌƌĂƟǀĞ
• List of deliverable items
• Management issues
• EĞĞĚĞĚĐŽƌƌĞĐƟǀĞĂĐƟŽŶƐ
• ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƌĞƐŽůƵƟŽŶŽĨƉƌŽďůĞŵƐ
• ϯϬͲĚĂLJůŽŽŬĂŚĞĂĚ
Task 1.4 Deliverables:
• 1.4.1. Monthly invoices
• ϭ͘ϰ͘Ϯ͘WƌŽŐƌĞƐƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐ
Task 1.5: Project Close-Out Files
At the end of the project, RRM will document and assemble all project deliverables and provide them in ĂĐĐŽƌĚĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚ^'͛ƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐůŽƐĞͲŽƵƚƉƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐ͘ůůĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐǁŝůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŝŶĂĐĐŽƌĚĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ WƌŽũĞĐƚ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞ͖ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ŝŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ZZDǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂůůƉƌŽũĞĐƚĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐŝŶĂŶŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĞĚĨĂƐŚŝŽŶĂƚƚŚĞ ĞŶĚŽĨƚŚĞǁŽƌŬĞīŽƌƚ͕ĚĞůŝǀĞƌĞĚŝŶĂŶĞůĞĐƚƌŽŶŝĐĨŽƌŵĂƚ͕ĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚĂŶ džĐĞůĮůĞĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƟŶŐƚŚĞůŽĐĂƟŽŶ
ĂŶĚĐŽŵƉůĞƟŽŶŽĨĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐ͘
ĂĐŚƚĂƐŬǁŝůůŚĂǀĞŝƚƐŽǁŶĨŽůĚĞƌ͘tŝƚŚŝŶĞĂĐŚƚĂƐŬƚŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞĂĨŽůĚĞƌǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞŶĂŵĞŽĨƚŚĞĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞĂŶĚƚŚĞĮŶĂůǀĞƌƐŝŽŶŽĨĞĂĐŚĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞǁŝƚŚŝŶŝƚ͘ ĂĐŚŵĞĞƟŶŐŚĞůĚǁŝůůŚĂǀĞĂ
ĨŽůĚĞƌŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂŐĞŶĚĂƐ͕ŶŽƚĞƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĂƚŵĞĞƟŶŐ͘ Task 1.5 Deliverables:
• ϭ͘ϱ͘ϭ͘WƌŽũĞĐƚĐůŽƐĞͲŽƵƚĮůĞƐǁŝƚŚĂĐĐŽŵƉĂŶLJŝŶŐ
džĐĞůĮůĞ
Task 1.6: REAP Metrics Data Collection and Reporting
ZZDǁŝůůǁŽƌŬǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ^'WDƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂŐƌĞĞĚͲƵƉŽŶƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚŵĞĂƐƵƌĂďůĞŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐĂŶĚŵĞƚƌŝĐƐĂƐ ƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚƚŽƚŚŝƐǁŽƌŬĞīŽƌƚ͘dŚĞƐĞŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐǁŝůůďĞƚŚĞďĂƐŝƐĨŽƌŵŽŶƚŚůLJƌĞƉŽƌƟŶŐŽĨƉƌŽŐƌĞƐƐĂŶĚŵĞĂƐƵƌĞĚ outcomes.
Task 1.6 Deliverables:
• ϭ͘ϲ͘ϭZ
WŵĞƚƌŝĐƐĚĂƚĂĐŽůůĞĐƟŽŶĂŶĚƌĞƉŽƌƟŶŐ
Task 2: Stakeholder Outreach
tĞďĞůŝĞǀĞĂŶĞīĞĐƟǀĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵĐƌĞĂƚĞƐĐŽŶĮĚĞŶĐĞŝŶƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͕ƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƐ ďƌŽĂĚͲďĂƐĞĚƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚƌĞŇĞĐƚƐƚŚĞŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƚƐĂŶĚŶĞĞĚƐŽĨƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘tĞĂůƐŽďĞůŝĞǀĞƚŚĂƚ ĞǀĞƌLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂŶĚĞǀĞƌLJĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĚĞƐĞƌǀĞƐĂĐƵƐƚŽŵŝnjĞĚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽŵĂdžŝŵŝnjĞƐƵĐĐĞƐƐ͘dŚŝƐƚĂƐŬŽƵƚůŝŶĞƐ ĂƐĞƌŝĞƐŽĨĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƚŽĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞĚŝĂůŽŐƵĞĂŶĚŐĞŶĞƌĂƚĞďƵLJͲŝŶĨŽƌƚŚŝƐ ĞīŽƌƚ͘ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚĂĞƐƚŚĞƟĐƐĐĂŶďĞĂƐƚƌŽŶŐƐŽƵƌĐĞŽĨƉƌŝĚĞĂŶĚŝĚĞŶƟƚLJĨŽƌƚŚĞůŽĐĂůĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ ^ŝŶĐĞƚŚŝƐǁŽƌŬĞīŽƌƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌďŽƚŚŵƵůƟͲĨĂŵŝůLJĂŶĚŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ͕ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ engagement on this topic provides a unique opportunity to build bridges and create trust through the public process.
/ŶŽƵƌĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ͕ǁĞŚĂǀĞĂůƐŽŽďƐĞƌǀĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŝƐŵŽƌĞ ƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůŝŶŶĂƚƵƌĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŌĞŶďĞŶĞĮƚƐŵŽƐƚĨƌŽŵĂƌŽďƵƐƚĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĨŽĐƵƐŝŶŐŽŶ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŶƚĞŶƚĂŶĚĚĞƐŝƌĞĚŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐ͘&ĞĞĚďĂĐŬŝƐŵŽƐƚĞīĞĐƟǀĞǁŚĞŶĨŽĐƵƐĞĚŽŶŐĂŝŶŝŶŐĂŶƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐ ĨƌŽŵŝƚLJƐƚĂī͕ĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŶĐŽŵŵŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ
18.a
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) WůĂŶŽĨ^ƚƵĚLJͬ^ĐŽƉĞŽĨtŽƌŬ | Section 3 13
City policy, standards, and the development review process. With this in mind, we have tailored the following ĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽďƵŝůĚƵƉŽŶƚŚŝƐĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞǁŚŝůĞĂůŝŐŶŝŶŐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚĂƐŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚŝŶƚŚĞZ&W͘ Task 2.1: Stakeholder Outreach and Vision
ZZDǁŝůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂWƵďůŝĐ/ŶǀŽůǀĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶ;W/WͿƚŚĂƚǁŝůůƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂŶĚǁŝůůďĞ ĐůŽƐĞůLJĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůǁŽƌŬ͘dŚĞW/WǁŝůůƐƵĐĐŝŶĐƚůLJƐƵŵŵĂƌŝnjĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŽďũĞĐƟǀĞƐ͕ŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚ components, and schedules linked to the technical process. ĞƐŝŐŶŽĨƚŚĞW/WǁŝůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞďƵƚŝƐŶŽƚůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚŽ͗
• Building on the City’s current procedures and outreach as described in this work program • WƌŽŵŽƟŶŐĂŶƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŶĞĞĚĨŽƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĂŶĚƚŚĞƌŽůĞŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŚĂǀĞ ŝŶƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨŝŶĮůůŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĂƐĞŝƚŚĞƌŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJŽƌĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨĂŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ • ƌĂǁŝŶŐĐůĞĂƌĐŽŶŶĞĐƟŽŶƐǁŝƚŚŽƚŚĞƌŝƚLJƉƌŝŽƌŝƟĞƐŽƌĞīŽƌƚƐ • &ŽĐƵƐŝŶŐĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶŽŶƐƉĞĐŝĮĐďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ • ĂůŝďƌĂƟŶŐƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶĂŶĚĨĞĞĚďĂĐŬŵĞƚŚŽĚƐƚŽĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŵĞŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌƐ • /ĚĞŶƟĨLJŝŶŐŵĂƌŬĞƟŶŐƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐĨŽƌǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉƐĂŶĚƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĚŝŐŝƚĂůĞͲďůĂƐƚƐ͕ƐŽĐŝĂůŵĞĚŝĂ ƉŽƐƚƐ͕ǁĞďƐŝƚĞƉŽƐƟŶŐƐ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŝŶƚĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƟŽŶŵĞƚŚŽĚƐ
dŚĞW/WǁŝůůĂůŝŐŶǁŝƚŚƚŚĞWDWĂŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞĂŶĚŝĚĞŶƟĨLJƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŵĞĂŶƐĂŶĚŵĞƚŚŽĚƐŽĨĐŽŶĚƵĐƟŶŐ ŝŶƚĞƌĂĐƟǀĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚƌŽŽƚĞĚŝŶĞƋƵŝƚLJĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶƉƌŝŶĐŝƉůĞƐ͘dŚĞW/WǁŝůůďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽ inform community members and stakeholders of the need for housing and educate them in a dialogue ĂďŽƵƚƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚŝnjĞĚĂŶĚƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞĚĞŶƟƚůĞŵĞŶƚͬƉĞƌŵŝƫŶŐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŐŽĂůŽĨ ĂĐĐĞůĞƌĂƟŶŐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ͘
Task 2.1 Deliverables:
• Ϯ͘ϭ͘ϭ͘ƌĂŌĂŶĚ&ŝŶĂůW/W͕ďĂƐĞĚŽŶĂƐŝŶŐůĞƌĞĚůŝŶĞĚĚƌĂŌŽĨŝƚLJͬ^'ĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ƟŵĞůŝŶĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŝŶ
ŶŐůŝƐŚĂŶĚ^ƉĂŶŝƐŚ͕ŝĨƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ
Task 2.2: Stakeholder Workshops
dŚŝƐƚĂƐŬŽƵƚůŝŶĞƐĂƐĞƌŝĞƐŽĨĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƚŽĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞĚŝĂůŽŐƵĞĂŶĚŐĞŶĞƌĂƚĞ ďƵLJͲŝŶĨŽƌƚŚŝƐĞīŽƌƚ͘ƐŵĞŶƟŽŶĞĚĂďŽǀĞ͕ŝŶŽƵƌĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ͕ǁĞŚĂǀĞĂůƐŽŽďƐĞƌǀĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨ ŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŝƐŵŽƌĞƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůŝŶŶĂƚƵƌĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŌĞŶďĞŶĞĮƚƐŵŽƐƚĨƌŽŵĂƌŽďƵƐƚ ĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĨŽĐƵƐŝŶŐŽŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŶƚĞŶƚĂŶĚĚĞƐŝƌĞĚŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐ͘&ĞĞĚďĂĐŬŝƐŵŽƐƚĞīĞĐƟǀĞǁŚĞŶĨŽĐƵƐĞĚ ŽŶŐĂŝŶŝŶŐĂŶƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐĨƌŽŵŝƚLJƐƚĂī͕ĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŶĐŽŵŵŽŶ ŝƐƐƵĞƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĞdžŝƐƟŶŐŝƚLJƉŽůŝĐLJ͕ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƌĞǀŝĞǁƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͘tŝƚŚƚŚŝƐŝŶŵŝŶĚ͕ we have structured our outreach process to align with the City’s recommended approach as outlined in the Z&WǁŝƚŚĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůŽƉƟŽŶƐ͘
tĞƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐĚĞƐŝƌĞƚŽĐŚŽŽƐĞƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉƐͶǀŝƌƚƵĂůŽƌŝŶͲƉĞƌƐŽŶͶŽŶĐĞ ƚŚŝƐǁŽƌŬĞīŽƌƚƌĞĂĐŚĞƐƚŚĞƐĞŵŝůĞƐƚŽŶĞƐ͘tĞǁŽƵůĚůŝŬĞƚŽŽīĞƌƚŚĞŇĞdžŝďŝůŝƚLJƚŽĐŚŽŽƐĞƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚŽƌ ŵŝdžͲĂŶĚͲŵĂƚĐŚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂǀĂƌŝĞƚLJŽĨĨŽƌŵĂƚƐĨŽƌĞĂƐĞŽĨƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŽŶ͘ZZDŚĂƐďƵĚŐĞƚĞĚƚŚŝƐƚĂƐŬĨŽƌďĞŝŶŐ ŝŶͲƉĞƌƐŽŶ͕ďƵƚƚŚĞƌĞŵĂLJďĞĐŽƐƚĞĸĐŝĞŶĐŝĞƐŝĨĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚǀŝƌƚƵĂůůLJ͘dŚĞďƵĚŐĞƚĂƐƐƵŵĞƐĂƚŽƚĂůŽĨƵƉƚŽƚǁŽ (2) workshops.
ZĞŐĂƌĚůĞƐƐŽĨƚŚĞĨŽƌŵĂƚʹŝŶͲƉĞƌƐŽŶŽƌǀŝƌƚƵĂůʹtŽƌŬƐŚŽƉηϭǁŝůůĨŽĐƵƐŽŶƚŚĞĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨůŽĐĂů ƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌŐƌŽƵƉƐ͘tŽƌŬƐŚŽƉηϮǁŝůůĨŽĐƵƐŽŶůŽĐĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌŐƌŽƵƉƐ͘ ĂĐŚƐĞƚŽĨǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉƐǁŝůůĨŽĐƵƐŽŶ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘dŚŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĂŶĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶĂůŽǀĞƌǀŝĞǁŽĨƚŚĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐŝŶƚŚĞ^'ƌĞŐŝŽŶĂŶĚƚŚŽƐĞƐƉĞĐŝĮĐƚŽ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ^ƚĂƚĞůĂǁƐĂƌŽƵŶĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ͕ĂŶĚ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ͛ƐĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐĂŶĚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͘ĞƐƚƉƌĂĐƟĐĞƐǁŝůůĂůƐŽďĞŚŝŐŚůŝŐŚƚĞĚƚŽƐŚŽǁ ƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐǁŚĞƌĞƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐĐŽƵůĚďĞŚĞĂĚĞĚ͘ĞƉĞŶĚŝŶŐŽŶĐŽŶƚĞŶƚĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚŝŶ ĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƟŽŶǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͕ĂĚŝŐŝƚĂůƐƵƌǀĞLJŵĂLJďĞĐŽŵďŝŶĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉĂƐĂƐŝŵƉůĞŵĞƚŚŽĚĨŽƌƚŚĞ stakeholders and developers to provide feedback. All comments or survey results received will be provided in a Feedback Survey Memo.
18.a
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 14 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project RRM will develop accessible, comprehensible, and appealing outreach materials to support the outreach plan.
RRM will develop content for up to four social media posts and announcements for the City to distribute on its ƉůĂƞŽƌŵƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂůŵĞĚŝĂ͕ŶĞǁƐůĞƩĞƌƐ͕ǁĞďƉĂŐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĞͲďůĂƐƚƐ͘ ZZDǁŝůůĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJWDƚŽŐĂƵŐĞŬĞLJĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐŽƌŬŶŽǁŶƌĞůĂƚĞĚŝƐƐƵĞƐ͕ĂƌĞĂƐŽĨƐĞŶƐŝƟǀŝƚLJ͕ and preferred engagement methods. All engagement conducted will be designed through a lens of equity ĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJƚŽƐĞƌǀĞƚŚĞƌĂŶŐĞŽĨƉĞŽƉůĞůŝǀŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘dŚĞƐĐŽƉĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƟŽŶŚŽƵƌƐ͕ĞǀĞŶƚ ĂƩĞŶĚĂŶĐĞ͕ĂŶĚĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƟŽŶ͘>ŽŽŬŝŶŐĂƚƚŚĞĚĞŵŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐƐŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ͕ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJŽŶĞͲƚŚŝƌĚŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂ ůĂƌŝƚĂŝƐ,ŝƐƉĂŶŝĐ͘tŚŝůĞƚŚŝƐĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƚŚĞůĞǀĞůŽĨ^ƉĂŶŝƐŚůĂŶŐƵĂŐĞƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŽŶ͕ŝƚŝƐĂƐƐƵŵĞĚ ƚŚĂƚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůǁŝůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŝŶ^ƉĂŶŝƐŚďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚŝƐ͘^ŝŵƵůƚĂŶĞŽƵƐŝŶƚĞƌƉƌĞƚĂƟŽŶŝƐŶŽƚĂƐƐƵŵĞĚďƵƚĐĂŶ ďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚǁŝƚŚĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĞĚƐĐŽƉĞĂŶĚĨĞĞ͘/ĨƚŚĞŝƚLJĚĞƐŝƌĞƐƚŚĞŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƚŽďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŝŶĂ ůĂŶŐƵĂŐĞŽƚŚĞƌƚŚĂŶ^ƉĂŶŝƐŚ͕ŝƚĐĂŶďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďLJŽƵƌƚĞĂŵĂƐĂŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂŶĚĨĞĞ͘ ƚƚŚĞŽŶƐĞƚŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͕ZZDǁŝůůǁŽƌŬǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ^'WD͕ǁŚŽŝƐƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƟŶŐǁŝƚŚ^'͛Ɛ DĂŶĂŐĞƌŽĨDĞĚŝĂΘWƵďůŝĐīĂŝƌƐŽƌĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞƉĞƌƐŽŶ͕ĂŶĚĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚƚŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĐŽŶƚĞŶƚ͕ĨŽƌŵĂƫŶŐ͕ ĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽƉƵďůŝĐͲĨĂĐŝŶŐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐǁŽƌŬĞīŽƌƚ͘ZZDǁŝůůĐƌĞĚŝƚ^'ĂƐĂĨƵŶĚĞƌŽĨƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚǀŝĂĂůŽŐŽŽƌƚĞdžƚ͘
Task 2.2 Deliverables:
• Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϭ͘dǁŽ;ϮͿĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞĚƉƵďůŝĐǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉƐʹŝŶͲƉĞƌƐŽŶŽƌǀŝƌƚƵĂůĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚďLJƚŚĞŝƚLJ • 2.2.2. Two (2) workshop feedback summary memos
Task 3: Technical Work
Task 3.1: Existing Local Policies and Regulations Review ZZDǁŝůůĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĂƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐĞdžŝƐƟŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƌĞǀŝĞǁƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĂŵĞŵŽƚŚĂƚ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƐƵƉĚĂƚĞƐƚŽƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞƚŚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͘dŚĞƌĞǀŝĞǁǁŝůůĂŶĂůLJnjĞĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƉŽůŝĐLJ ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ͕ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚƉĞƌŵŝƚƉƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐ͘dŚŝƐŵĂLJ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐĨŽƌďŽƚŚƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐ;ĞŶƟƚůĞŵĞŶƚƐͿĂŶĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐͬƉĞƌŵŝƚ ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌĞƐŝŐŶ'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐĂŶĚhŶŝĮĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽĚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŽĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽƌĞĮŶŝŶŐĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŝŶƚŽŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͘ ^ŝŵŝůĂƌƚŽŽƵƌŵƵůƟͲĚŝƐĐŝƉůŝŶĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƚƌƵƚŚͲƚĞƐƚĞĚďLJĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƐǁŚŽ ŚĂǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚŵƵůƟͲĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů͕ĂŶĚŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ŽƵƌƚĞĂŵƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚƐƚŚĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƌĞǀŝĞǁƉƌŽĐĞƐƐƐŝŶĐĞǁĞŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶŽŶďŽƚŚƐŝĚĞƐŽĨƚŚĞĐŽƵŶƚĞƌ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶƚŽǁŽƌŬŝŶŐĐůŽƐĞůLJ ǁŝƚŚĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƐŽŶŝŶĮůůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ǁĞŚĂǀĞƐĞĞŶŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ͕ŐŝǀŝŶŐƵƐĂƉƌĂĐƟĐĂů ƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐŽĨŚŽǁƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐƚƌĂŶƐůĂƚĞŝŶƚŽďƵŝůƚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚĞŶƐƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĂƚŽƵƌƉůĂŶƐĨŽƐƚĞƌƉƌŝǀĂƚĞ ŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚ͘dŚŝƐƚĂƐŬǁŝůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞƵƉƚŽĞŝŐŚƚŚŽƵƌƐŽĨǀŝƌƚƵĂůŝŶƚĞƌǀŝĞǁƐǁŝƚŚŝƚLJƐƚĂīĂŶĚůŽĐĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƐƚŽ ŐĂŝŶŝŶƐŝŐŚƚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĂŶĚƉŽƚĞŶƟĂůŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐĨŽƌŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚ͘ dŚĞƌĞǀŝĞǁǁŝůůĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌ,ƉƌŽͲŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ͕ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͕ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ĂŶĚĮǀĞ;ϱͿƚŽƚĞŶ;ϭϬͿƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚďLJƚŚĞŝƚLJ͕ĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚĂŶLJŽƚŚĞƌƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĞīŽƌƚƐ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƵŶĚĞƌǁĂLJďLJƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘dŚŝƐĞdžĞƌĐŝƐĞǁŝůůƐĞƌǀĞƚŽƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŚŽǁƚŚĞŝƚLJĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐĂŶĚŚŽǁůŽŶŐƚŚĞĞŶƟƚůĞŵĞŶƚƐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐƚLJƉŝĐĂůůLJƚĂŬĞƐ͘ZZDǁŝůůƐƵŵŵĂƌŝnjĞŬĞLJĮŶĚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶƐƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶĂĚƌĂŌƐƵŵŵĂƌLJĂŶĚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶŵĞŵŽ͘ ĂƐĞĚŽŶĨĞĞĚďĂĐŬƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďLJŝƚLJƐƚĂī͕ZZDǁŝůůƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĮŶĂůƐƵŵŵĂƌLJĂŶĚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶŵĞŵŽ͘ The review will assess the following for the City:
•
džŝƐƟŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐĂŶĚƌĞǀŝĞǁƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĞdžŝƐƟŶŐĞŶƟƚůĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉĞƌŵŝƚ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐĂŶĚƌĞĐĞŶƚĚĞƐŝŐŶƌĞǀŝĞǁŵĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵƐ
• dLJƉŝĐĂůƉĞƌŵŝƫŶŐƟŵĞůŝŶĞƐĂŶĚĨĂĐƚŽƌƐƚŚĂƚƚĞŶĚƚŽĞdžƚĞŶĚƚŚĞƉĞƌŵŝƫŶŐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĂƐĂŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚ makes its way through the City’s design review and approval process • dLJƉŝĐĂůƟŵĞůŝŶĞĨŽƌŝŶŝƟĂůĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞŶĞƐƐĐŚĞĐŬĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚďLJĂůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚŝƚLJĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ;Ğ͘Ő͘
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕WůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕WƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ
18.a
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) WůĂŶŽĨ^ƚƵĚLJͬ^ĐŽƉĞŽĨtŽƌŬ | Section 3 15
• dŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞŶĞƐƐĐŚĞĐŬƐĂƚLJƉŝĐĂůƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐďĞĨŽƌĞĂƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐ͞ĚĞĞŵĞĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͟
• ĐŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐŵĞŶƚĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶƚŚĂƚƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶŝŶŐƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŵĂLJƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶĂƌĞĚƵĐƟŽŶŽĨ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĐŽƐƚƐďLJƌĞƋƵŝƌŝŶŐůĞƐƐƟŵĞƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕ƚŚƵƐŵĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJŽĨŵŽƌĞ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƵŶŝƚƐŵŽƌĞĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĂůůLJĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ
• ŶĂůLJƐŝƐŽĨĮǀĞ;ϱͿƚŽƚĞŶ;ϭϬͿƌĞĐĞŶƚŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJĂŶĚŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉĞƌŵŝƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐͬĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐ Task 3.1 Deliverables:
• ϯ͘ϭ͘ϭ͘ƌĂŌ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJĂŶĚZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶDĞŵŽ
• ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘&ŝŶĂů^ƵŵŵĂƌLJĂŶĚZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶDĞŵŽďĂƐĞĚŽŶĂƐŝŶŐůĞƌĞĚůŝŶĞĚĚƌĂŌŽĨŝƚLJͬ^' comments
Task 3.2: Objective Design Standards
dŚĞŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂƌĞŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚƚŽďĞĂƉƉůŝĞĚƚŽĐŝƚLJǁŝĚĞŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĂŶĚŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ͘
īŽƌƚƐŝŶdĂƐŬϯ͘ϭǁŝůůŝĚĞŶƟĨLJƚŚŽƐĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŚĂƚŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞŵŽĚŝĮĞĚŽƌƌĞƉůĂĐĞĚƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞ ŽďũĞĐƟǀŝƚLJĂŶĚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƋƵĂůŝƚLJĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘ĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚŝƐĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ͕ZZDǁŝůůƉƌĞƉĂƌĞŵƵůƟͲĨĂŵŝůLJͬŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ ŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘dŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐǁŝůůďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽŝŶĐůƵĚĞďƵƚŶŽƚďĞůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚŽ͗ • ^ƵƉƉůĞŵĞŶƚ͕ƌĞƉůĂĐĞ͕ĂŶĚŝŶƐŽŵĞĐĂƐĞƐƚƌĂŶƐůĂƚĞĞdžŝƐƟŶŐnjŽŶŝŶŐĐŽĚĞƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐĂŶĚŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌĞƐŝŐŶ'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐŝŶƚŽĐůĞĂƌ͕ŽďũĞĐƟǀĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐǁŝƚŚĚŝƐĐƌĞƚĞĞdžƉůĂŶĂƚŽƌLJŐƌĂƉŚŝĐƐĂƐ appropriate
• ĂůŝďƌĂƚĞŽďũĞĐƟǀĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŽĞŶĂďůĞƚŚĞŵĂdžŝŵƵŵĚĞŶƐŝƚLJĂůůŽǁĞĚĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚ^ĞŶĂƚĞŝůůϯϯϬǁŝƚŚ ĂƐĞŶƐŝƟǀŝƚLJƚŽĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌ
• ĚĚƌĞƐƐŝƐƐƵĞƐŽƌĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐĂƌŝƐŝŶŐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŚŝŐŚĞƐƚǀŽůƵŵĞƉŽƚĞŶƟĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƚLJƉĞŽƌůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐŽĨ greatest concern
• ĚĚƌĞƐƐĨŽƌŵĂŶĚƐŝƚĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͖ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ĂůƐŽĐůĂƌŝĨLJƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐĨŽƌĚĞŶƐŝƚLJŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĚĞŶƐŝƚLJďŽŶƵƐ͕ ŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞ͕ĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƐͬŽƌŝĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ͕ƐŝƚĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĂƐĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ͕ŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂůĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ • ůůŽǁ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂƚŽŝĚĞŶƟĨLJƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞŵŽƐƚŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚ;ŽƌĐŚĂůůĞŶŐŝŶŐͿůŽĐĂůůLJƚŽĨŽĐƵƐŽŶ clarifying standards
dŚĞŽďũĞĐƟǀĞŝƐƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂŶĞĂƐLJͲƚŽͲƵƐĞĂŶĚĞĂƐLJͲƚŽͲĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚĞƌĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƌĞĚƵŶĚĂŶĐLJ ĂŶĚƵŶŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJŽƌƐƵďũĞĐƟǀĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŽƚŚĞƌǁŝƐĞĐŽǀĞƌĞĚďLJĞdžŝƐƟŶŐĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͘dŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ ǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶŽŶƚŽƉŝĐƐƐƵĐŚĂƐƐŝƚĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŵĂƐƐŝŶŐĂŶĚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƐ͕ ĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƐ͕ƵƟůŝƚĂƌŝĂŶͬŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂůĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐŽĨďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ĞƚĐ͘dŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐǁŝůůďĞĐůĞĂƌůLJǁƌŝƩĞŶĂŶĚ ƚĂŝůŽƌĞĚƚŽƚŚĞƵůƟŵĂƚĞƵƐĞƌƐ͗ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͕ĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƐ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƉƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůƐ͕ŝƚLJƐƚĂī͕ĂŶĚĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬĞƌƐ͘ ZZDǁŝůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉƵƉƚŽĮǀĞƐĂŵƉůĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚŐƌĂƉŚŝĐƐ;ƉƌŽƚŽƚLJƉĞƐͿƚŽŝůůƵƐƚƌĂƚĞƚŚĞĞīĞĐƟǀĞƵƐĞ ŽĨƚŚĞŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘ZZDǁŝůůĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƚĞǁŝƚŚŝƚLJƐƚĂīƚŽŝĚĞŶƟĨLJƚLJƉŝĐĂůƉĂƌĐĞůĚŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶƐƚŽ ƐĞƌǀĞƚŚĞŚŝŐŚĞƐƚǀŽůƵŵĞƉŽƚĞŶƟĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƚLJƉĞŽƌůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐŽĨŐƌĞĂƚĞƐƚĐŽŶĐĞƌŶ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƚŽƚLJƉĞƐǁŝůů ĐŽǀĞƌĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞnjŽŶŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƟŽŶƐĨŽƌŵƵůƟͲĨĂŵŝůLJƵƐĞƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŵƵůƟͲĨĂŵŝůLJ͕ŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů njŽŶĞƐ͘KďũĞĐƟǀĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚĞdžƚǁŝůůďĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚďLJĞdžƉůĂŶĂƚŽƌLJĚŝĂŐƌĂŵƐƚŚĂƚŵĂŬĞƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĞĂƐLJƚŽ ƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚĂŶĚƐŝŵƉůĞƚŽŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚ͘dŚŝƐƐĐŽƉĞĂƐƐƵŵĞƐƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨƵƉƚŽƚĞŶ;ϭϬͿĚŝĂŐƌĂŵƐƵƟůŝnjŝŶŐ ƉƌŽƚŽƚLJƉĞŐƌĂƉŚŝĐƐƚŽŝůůƵƐƚƌĂƚĞŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƚŽƉŝĐƐĂŶĚǁŝůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞǀĂƌLJŝŶŐĐŽůŽƌƐ͕ĚŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚĐĂůůͲ outs to ensure readability.
tŚŝůĞƚŚŝƐƐĐŽƉĞŽĨǁŽƌŬĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨŶĞǁnjŽŶŝŶŐƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐ͕ZZDǁŝůůƌĞǀŝĞǁ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞĐŽŵƉĂƟďŝůŝƚLJĂŶĚŵĂLJƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶƐǁŚĞƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞŽŶŚŽǁ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĐĂŶďĞĂĚũƵƐƚĞĚƚŽƌĞŇĞĐƚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƐƚĂƚĞĂŶĚůŽĐĂůĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ͘&ŽƌĞdžĂŵƉůĞ͕ĂĚũƵƐƚŵĞŶƚŽĨ ĚĞŶƐŝƚLJůĂŶŐƵĂŐĞƚŽĞŶĂďůĞŵĂdžŝŵƵŵĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƵŶĚĞƌƚŚĞ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶůĂŶĚƵƐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƟŽŶ͕ŽƌƐĞƚďĂĐŬ ŵŽĚŝĮĐĂƟŽŶƐƚŚĂƚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŵŝŶŝŵƵŵƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬǁŝĚƚŚƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞƐƉĂĐĞĨŽƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŵŽďŝůŝƚLJĂŶĚƚŽ ĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞƚŚĞĚĞŵĂŶĚĨŽƌŽƚŚĞƌĂŵĞŶŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJ͘
18.a
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 16 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project RRM will create a digital template for the standards. This will allow the City and SCAG to provide comments ŽŶƚŚĞůĂLJŽƵƚĂŶĚŐƌĂƉŚŝĐĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƉƌŝŽƌƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞĮƌƐƚĚƌĂŌŽĨƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ͘KŶĐĞǁĞŚĂǀĞƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚ ŽŶĞƐĞƚŽĨĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚĞĚƌĞĚůŝŶĞĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƚŚĞƚĞŵƉůĂƚĞǁŝůůďĞĮŶĂůŝnjĞĚĂŶĚƵƐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞ ŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚ͘ZZDǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƚŚĂƚĐĂŶďĞƵƐĞĚďLJŝƚLJƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƐƚĂī͕ ĞĂƐŝůLJƐŚĂƌĞĚǁŝƚŚĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚƐ͕ƚŽĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚĐŽĚŝĮĞĚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞŵƵŶŝĐŝƉĂůĐŽĚĞĂƐĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ͘ dŚŝƐƚĂƐŬŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĨŽƵƌ;ϰͿĚƌĂŌƐŽĨƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͕ĂŶĚĞĂĐŚĚƌĂŌǁŝůůďĞŵŽĚŝĮĞĚďĂƐĞĚŽŶĂƐŝŶŐůĞ ĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚĞĚƌĞĚůŝŶĞƐĞƚŽĨ^'ͬŝƚLJĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗
• ƌĂŌϭͶWƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌLJ͘dŽƉŝĐƐƚŽďĞĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚĂƐĂŵƉůĞŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƟŽŶ ǁŝůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŝŶĂƐůŝĚĞĚĞĐŬƚŚĂƚĐĂŶďĞƵƐĞĚŝŶĂĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶǁŝƚŚƐƚĂīĂŶĚĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨĂǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉ ƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ͘dŚŝƐǀĞƌƐŝŽŶǁŝůůďĞƌĞǀŝĞǁĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͖ĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐǁŝůůďĞŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĚƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂĨƵůů version of the standards.
• ƌĂŌϮͶ^ƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌͬŝƚLJZĞǀŝĞǁ͘dŚŝƐǀĞƌƐŝŽŶǁŝůůďĞƌĞǀŝĞǁĞĚŝŶƚĞƌŶĂůůLJďLJƐƚĂīĂŶĚƉŽƚĞŶƟĂůůLJŬĞLJ ƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌƐ͘ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶƐǁŝůůďĞŵĂĚĞƉƌŝŽƌƚŽƌĞůĞĂƐŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌĞǀŝĞǁĚƌĂŌ͘ • ƌĂŌϯͶ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƐƐŝŽŶ͘dŚŝƐǀĞƌƐŝŽŶǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĂŶĚĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬĞƌƐƚŽ ĐŽŵŵĞŶƚŽŶƚŚĞĚƌĂŌƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘&ĞĞĚďĂĐŬǁŝůůďĞŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĚƚŽĮŶĂůŝnjĞƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘ • ƌĂŌϰͶ&ŝŶĂů͘dŚŝƐǀĞƌƐŝŽŶǁŝůůďĞĮŶĂůŝnjĞĚĂŌĞƌĂĚŽƉƟŽŶ͕ǁŝƚŚĂŽŶĞͲƉĂŐĞĞdžĞĐƵƟǀĞƐƵŵŵĂƌLJ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďŝŶŐƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐΖƉƵƌƉŽƐĞƚƌĂŶƐůĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŽ^ƉĂŶŝƐŚ͕ĂƐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚďLJŝƚLJƐƚĂī͘ Task 3.2 Deliverables:
• hƉƚŽĨŽƵƌ;ϰͿĚƌĂŌƐŽĨƚŚĞŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚĂďŽǀĞ͘ Task 3.3: Housing Development Permit Application
ZZDǁŝůůĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞǁŝƚŚŝƚLJƐƚĂīƚŽŵĂŬĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶƐĨŽƌƌĞǀŝƐŝŶŐƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐƉĞƌŵŝƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶ ĨŽƌŵƐĂŶĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚďĂƐĞĚŽŶǁŽƌŬĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƵŶĚĞƌdĂƐŬϯ͘ϭĂŶĚϯ͘Ϯ͘dŚŝƐŵĂLJŝŶĐůƵĚĞƉĞƌŵŝƚ ĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƟŽŶ͕ƐŝŵƉůŝĮĐĂƟŽŶŽĨĨŽƌŵƐ͕ŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽƌƌĞǀŝƐŝŽŶŽĨĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ;ƐͿƚŽĨŽƐƚĞƌĂŶ ĞdžƉĞĚŝƚĞĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶĂŶĚƌĞǀŝĞǁƐŝŵƉůĞƌ͘/ŵƉƌŽǀĞĚĂŶĚƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞĚƉĞƌŵŝƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐǁŝůůŚĞůƉ ĞdžƉĞĚŝƚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂīŽƌĚĂďŝůŝƚLJďĞLJŽŶĚŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŝŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶĂƌLJƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ KŶĞ;ϭͿƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚƌĞǀŝƐĞĚƉĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌŵĂŶĚŽŶĞ;ϭͿĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚǁŝůůďĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐƚŚĞ ƵŶŝƋƵĞŝƚLJŶĞĞĚƐ͖ƚŚĞĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞǁŝůůďĞƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚŝŶĂĚŝŐŝƚĂůĨŽƌŵĂƚƚŚĂƚĂůůŽǁƐƚŚĞŝƚLJƚŽĚŝŐŝƚĂůůLJƉŽƐƚŽƌ ƉƌŝŶƚƚŚĞĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞ͘dŚĞƌĞǀŝƐĞĚƉĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌŵĂŶĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚǁŝůůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJƵƉĚĂƚĞƐĨŽƌ ^ƚĂƚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚůĂǁĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐ͕ƐŝŵƉůŝĮĐĂƟŽŶŽĨƐƵďŵŝƩĂůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚƵƉĚĂƚĞƐĨŽƌ ŵŝŶŝƐƚĞƌŝĂůƌĞǀŝĞǁ͘ŝƚLJƐƚĂī;ĂŶĚĚĞůŝďĞƌĂƟǀĞďŽĚLJŝĨŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJͿǁŝůůƌĞǀŝĞǁƚŚĞĚƌĂŌĚŝŐŝƚĂůĨŽƌŵĂƚƌĞǀŝƐĞĚ ƉĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌŵĂŶĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďLJZZDĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĨĞĞĚďĂĐŬ͘ZZDǁŝůůƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĮŶĂůƉĞƌŵŝƚ ĨŽƌŵĂŶĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚďĂƐĞĚŽŶĂƐŝŶŐůĞĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚĞĚƌĞĚůŝŶĞĚƌĂŌŽĨŝƚLJƐƚĂīĨĞĞĚďĂĐŬ͘ Task 3.3 Deliverables:
• ϯ͘ϯ͘ϭ͘ƌĂŌĚŝŐŝƚĂůĨŽƌŵĂƚƌĞǀŝƐĞĚƉĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌŵĂŶĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ • ϯ͘ϯ͘Ϯ͘&ŝŶĂůĚŝŐŝƚĂůĨŽƌŵĂƚƌĞǀŝƐĞĚƉĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌŵĂŶĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ Task 4: Public Hearings
Task 4.1: Development Committee
ZZDǁŝůůǁŽƌŬĐůŽƐĞůLJǁŝƚŚŝƚLJƐƚĂīƚŽƉƌĞƉĂƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽŵŵŝƩĞĞ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƟŽŶƚŽƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘dŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶĐŽŶƚĞŶƚǁŝůůĨŽĐƵƐŽŶƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ changes to the City’s development policies and programs and provide background, analysis, and summary of ƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘ůůŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐǁŝůůďĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞůLJĐĂůŝďƌĂƚĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƋƵĂůŝĮĞĚ ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶŽŶŬĞLJĮŶĚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐĐƌĞĂƚĞĚĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘>ĂŶŐƵĂŐĞĂŶĚŐƌĂƉŚŝĐƐǁŝůůďĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽďĞĞĂƐŝůLJĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞƚŽƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĂŶĚĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬĞƌƐ͘ZZDǁŝůůƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƌĂŌϯʹ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƐƐŝŽŶ ĚƌĂŌƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŽƐŽůŝĐŝƚĨĞĞĚďĂĐŬĨŽƌŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƟŽŶ͘
18.a
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) WůĂŶŽĨ^ƚƵĚLJͬ^ĐŽƉĞŽĨtŽƌŬ | Section 3 17
ZZDǁŝůůƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĚƌĂŌŽĨƚŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĨŽƌŝƚLJƐƚĂīƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐƚŽ ƉƌŽĚƵĐĞƚŚĞĮŶĂůǀĞƌƐŝŽŶ͘ZZDǁŝůůĂůƐŽƉƌĞƉĂƌĞƐƵŵŵĂƌLJŶŽƚĞƐŽĨƚŚĞŵĞĞƟŶŐ͘dŚŝƐƚĂƐŬĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ǁƌŝƟŶŐƐƚĂīƌĞƉŽƌƚƐ͕ĂƐZZDǁŝůůĂƐƐƵŵĞŝƚLJƐƚĂīǁŝůůƉƌĞƉĂƌĞƐƚĂīƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĂŶĚĂŶLJƌĞƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐŶĞĞĚĞĚĨŽƌ ĐŽĚŝĮĐĂƟŽŶŽĨŶĞǁŽƌƌĞǀŝƐĞĚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘
Task 4.1 Deliverables:
• ϰ͘ϭ͘ϭ͘ƌĂŌWƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ
• ϰ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘&ŝŶĂůWƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ
• ϰ͘ϭ͘ϯ͘^ƵŵŵĂƌLJŵĞĞƟŶŐŶŽƚĞƐ
Task 4.2: Planning Commission
ZZDǁŝůůŵŽĚŝĨLJƚŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕ŝĨŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJ͕ĂŶĚƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƚŚĞŵĂƚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ ŵĞĞƟŶŐƚŽƐŽůŝĐŝƚĨĞĞĚďĂĐŬĨŽƌŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƟŽŶ͘ZZDǁŝůůƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĚƌĂŌǀĞƌƐŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĨŽƌ ŝƚLJƐƚĂīƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐƚŽƉƌŽĚƵĐĞƚŚĞĮŶĂůǀĞƌƐŝŽŶ͘ZZDǁŝůůƉƌĞƉĂƌĞƐƵŵŵĂƌLJŶŽƚĞƐ ŽĨƚŚĞŵĞĞƟŶŐ͘dŚŝƐƚĂƐŬĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞǁƌŝƟŶŐƐƚĂīƌĞƉŽƌƚƐ͕ĂƐZZDǁŝůůĂƐƐƵŵĞŝƚLJƐƚĂīǁŝůůƉƌĞƉĂƌĞ ƐƚĂīƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĂŶĚĂŶLJƌĞƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽĐŽĚŝĨLJŶĞǁŽƌƌĞǀŝƐĞĚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘ŶĞƌƌĂƚĂƐŚĞĞƚŵĂLJďĞƵƐĞĚƚŽ ĐĂƉƚƵƌĞƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ͛ƐƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚƌĞǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŽďĞƐŚĂƌĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝů͘ Task 4.2 Deliverables:
• ϰ͘Ϯ͘ϭ͘ƌĂŌWƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ
• ϰ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ͘&ŝŶĂůWƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ
• ϰ͘Ϯ͘ϯ͘^ƵŵŵĂƌLJŵĞĞƟŶŐŶŽƚĞƐ
Task 4.3: City Council
ZZDǁŝůůǁŽƌŬĐůŽƐĞůLJǁŝƚŚŝƚLJƐƚĂīƚŽƌĞĮŶĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝůĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƌ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƟŽŶƚŽĂƉƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ůůŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐǁŝůůďĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞůLJĐĂůŝďƌĂƚĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƋƵĂůŝĮĞĚ ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶŽŶŬĞLJĮŶĚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐĐƌĞĂƚĞĚĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘>ĂŶŐƵĂŐĞĂŶĚŐƌĂƉŚŝĐƐǁŝůůďĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽďĞĞĂƐŝůLJĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞƚŽƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĂŶĚĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬĞƌƐ͘ZZDǁŝůůƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĚƌĂŌǀĞƌƐŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ ƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĨŽƌŝƚLJƐƚĂīƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐƚŽƉƌŽĚƵĐĞƚŚĞĮŶĂůǀĞƌƐŝŽŶ͘ZZDǁŝůů ƉƌĞƉĂƌĞƐƵŵŵĂƌLJŶŽƚĞƐŽĨƚŚĞŵĞĞƟŶŐ͘ZZDǁŝůůŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝůŽŵŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉƌĂŌϰʹ&ŝŶĂů ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌĂĚŽƉƟŽŶͬĐŽĚŝĮĐĂƟŽŶďLJƚŚĞŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝůĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞŵĞĞƟŶŐ͘dŚŝƐƚĂƐŬĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ǁƌŝƟŶŐƐƚĂīƌĞƉŽƌƚƐ͕ĂƐZZDǁŝůůĂƐƐƵŵĞŝƚLJƐƚĂīǁŝůůƉƌĞƉĂƌĞƐƚĂīƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĂŶĚĂŶLJƌĞƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽ codify new or revised standards.
Task 4.3 Deliverables:
• ϰ͘ϯ͘ϭ͘ƌĂŌWƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ
• ϰ͘ϯ͘Ϯ͘&ŝŶĂůWƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ
• ϰ͘ϯ͘ϯ͘^ƵŵŵĂƌLJŵĞĞƟŶŐŶŽƚĞƐ
Task 5: Final Package
Task 5.1: Executive Summary Report
ZZDǁŝůůƵƉůŽĂĚĂůůĚƌĂŌĂŶĚĮŶĂůĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĨŽůĚĞƌĂƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďLJƚŚĞ^'WD͘ZZDǁŝůůĂůƐŽ ƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĂďƌŝĞĨĮŶĂůĞdžĞĐƵƟǀĞƌĞƉŽƌƚƚŚĂƚƐƵŵŵĂƌŝnjĞƐŬĞLJƚĂŬĞĂǁĂLJƐ͕ůĞƐƐŽŶƐůĞĂƌŶĞĚ͕ďĞƐƚƉƌĂĐƟĐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚ ĨƵƚƵƌĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƟŽŶƐ͘
Task 5.1 Deliverables:
• ϱ͘ϭ͘ϭ͘
džĞĐƵƟǀĞ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJZĞƉŽƌƚ
18.a
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 18 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Work Program Assumptions
dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚǁŽƌŬƉƌŽŐƌĂŵĂŶĚĐŽƌƌĞƐƉŽŶĚŝŶŐďƵĚŐĞƚĂƌĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĂƐƐƵŵƉƟŽŶƐ͗ • DĞĞƟŶŐƩĞŶĚĂŶĐĞ͘dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚďƵĚŐĞƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĂƩĞŶĚĂŶĐĞĂƚŵĞĞƟŶŐƐͬǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉƐŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ ƐĐŽƉĞŽĨǁŽƌŬ͘dŚĞĐŽƐƚƐŽĨĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůŵĞĞƟŶŐĂƩĞŶĚĂŶĐĞ͕ŽƌŝŶͲƉĞƌƐŽŶŵĞĞƟŶŐƐ͕ǁŝůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂů ďƵĚŐĞƚŝĨƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ͘dĞůĞĐŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐĂŶĚŵĞĞƟŶŐƐǁŝƚŚƐƚĂīǁŝůůďĞŚĞůĚĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂŶĚĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚďƵĚŐĞƚ͘/ĨƚŚĞ^ĐŽƉĞŝƐƐŝůĞŶƚ͕ƚŚŝƐĂƐƐƵŵĞƐĂǀŝƌƚƵĂůŵĞĞƟŶŐ͘ • ŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚĞĚŽŵŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶ͘ŝƚLJƐƚĂīǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂƐŝŶŐůĞƐĞƚŽĨŶŽŶͲĐŽŶŇŝĐƟŶŐ͕ĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚĞĚ ĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐŽŶƚŚĞƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨĚƌĂŌƐŽĨĂůůĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͘
•
ůĞĐƚƌŽŶŝĐŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͘tĞǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŝŐŝƚĂůĮůĞƐŽĨĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐŝŶD^tŽƌĚŽƌ/ŶĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚŝŶĂǁĞďͲ ƌĞĂĚLJW&ĨŽƌŵĂƚ͘
• WƌŝŶƟŶŐ͘ŝƚLJƐƚĂīǁŝůůďĞƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌƉƌŝŶƟŶŐĂŶĚĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƟŽŶŽĨĐŽƉŝĞƐŽĨƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĂĚƌĂŌĂŶĚ ĮŶĂůĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŝŶƟŶŐŽĨĂůůŵĞĞƟŶŐŶŽƟĐĞŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͘ • DƵůƟƉůĞ>ĂŶŐƵĂŐĞƐ͘DƵůƟůŝŶŐƵĂůƚƌĂŶƐůĂƟŽŶĂŶĚŝŶƚĞƌƉƌĞƚĂƟŽŶŝƐĂƐƐƵŵĞĚƚŽďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďLJƚŚĞŝƚLJ unless otherwise stated.
• ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůYƵĂůŝƚLJĐƚŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞ͘
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶǁĂƐŶŽƚ
ƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŝƐƐƵĞĚZ&WĂŶĚ͕ŝĨŶĞĞĚĞĚ͕ŝƐĂƐƐƵŵĞĚƚŽďĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚďLJŽƚŚĞƌƐ͘ • ĚĚŝƟŽŶĂů^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͘ĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐďĞLJŽŶĚƚŚŽƐĞŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƐĐŽƉĞŽĨǁŽƌŬǁŝůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĂƚ ƚŚĞŵĂƌŬĞƚďŝůůŝŶŐƌĂƚĞƐŽĨƚŚĞĮƌŵĂƚƚŚĞƟŵĞƚŚĞĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂƌĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ͘
18.a
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 19 Section Four:
Schedule
Proposal For SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
WŝĐƚƵƌĞĚ͗ǀŝůĂKĂŬƐDƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ǀŝůĂĞĂĐŚ͕
18.a
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 20 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Task 1: Project Management and Coordination
Subtask 1.1: Project Kick Off Meeting
Subtask 1.2: Project Management Plan and Schedule
Subtask 1.3: Project Management Meetings
Subtask 1.4: Monthly Invoicing and Reporting
Subtask 1.5: Project Close-Out Files
Subtask 1.6: REAP Metrics Data Collection and Reporting Task 2: Stakeholder Outreach
Subtask 2.1: Stakeholder Outreach and Vision
Subtask 2.2: Stakeholder Workshops
Task 3: Technical Work
Subtask 3.1: Existing Local Policies and Regulations Review Subtask 3.2: Objective Development and Design Standards Subtask 3.3: Housing Development Permit Application
Task 4: Public Hearings
Subtask 4.1: Development Committee
Subtask 4.2: Planning Commission
Subtask 4.3: City Council
Task 5: Final Package
Subtask 5.1: Executive Summary Report
Meeting Deliverable
67 Santa Clarita SCAG Grant REAP 2.0
Project Schedule
March 25, 2025 12345
Project Schedule
18.a
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞ | Section 4 21
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
4$)&%6-&3&7*4&%
4&&"55"$).&/5
1"(&
4$)&%6-&3&7*4&%
4&&"55"$).&/5
1"(&
18.a
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
18.a
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 23 5
Section Five:
Program Management
Proposal for
SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
WŝĐƚƵƌĞĚ͗
DŽLJůĂŶdĞƌƌĂĐĞDƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕
^ĂŶ>ƵŝƐKďŝƐƉŽ͕
18.a
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 24 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Program Management Approach
ZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉĞŵƉůŽLJƐĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĚĐƌŝƟĐĂůƉĂƚŚƉƌŽũĞĐƚŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚ͕ĞŶƐƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĂƚŬĞLJ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚŵŝůĞƐƚŽŶĞƐ͕ĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶĐŝĞƐĂƌĞĐůĞĂƌůLJŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŽƵƚƐĞƚ͘KƵƌƚĞĂŵƵƟůŝnjĞƐ ĞůƚĞŬsŝƐŝŽŶĨŽƌďƵĚŐĞƚŵŽŶŝƚŽƌŝŶŐĂŶĚDŝĐƌŽƐŽŌWƌŽũĞĐƚĨŽƌƚĂƐŬƐĐŚĞĚƵůŝŶŐ͕ĂůůŽǁŝŶŐƵƐƚŽƚƌĂĐŬƚĂƐŬ ƌĞůĂƟŽŶƐŚŝƉƐĂŶĚƟŵŝŶŐĞīĞĐƟǀĞůLJ͘ZĞŐƵůĂƌĐŚĞĐŬͲŝŶƐ͕ŝŶƚĞƌŶĂůƋƵĂůŝƚLJĐŽŶƚƌŽůƌĞǀŝĞǁƐ͕ĂŶĚŵŝůĞƐƚŽŶĞ approvals ensure that each phase progresses smoothly.
Project Schedule
dŚĞƟŵĞůŝŶĞƐŚŽǁŶŽŶƉĂŐĞϮϬŝůůƵƐƚƌĂƚĞƐŽƵƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚďLJ͗ • DĂƉƉŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉŚĂƐĞƐĂŶĚŬĞLJĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐŝŶĂĐůĞĂƌ͕ƐĞƋƵĞŶƟĂůŽƌĚĞƌ͘ • ĞĮŶŝŶŐĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶĐŝĞƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞĐƌŝƟĐĂůƉĂƚŚĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐĂƌĞƉƌŝŽƌŝƟnjĞĚ͘ • Including review points and approvals to align with our quality control process. dŚŝƐƟŵĞůŝŶĞŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞƐǁŝƚŚŽƵƌŝŶƚĞƌŶĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬ͕ĞŶƐƵƌŝŶŐĞĸĐŝĞŶƚĞdžĞĐƵƟŽŶĂŶĚ adaptability to client needs.
WŝĐƚƵƌĞĚ͗WĂƐĞŽsŽůƵŶƚĂƌŝŽīŽƌĚĂďůĞ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂ͕
18.a
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 25 Section Six:
Personnel, Equipment, and Facilities
Proposal For SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
WŝĐƚƵƌĞĚ͗ǀĞŶŝĚĂ^ĞƌƌĂ>ĂƐWĂůŵĂƐīŽƌĚĂďůĞ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕^ĂŶůĞŵĞŶƚĞ͕
18.a
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 26 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Our Team for Santa Clarita
ZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉƚŚƌŝǀĞƐŽŶƐƵĐĐĞƐƐĨƵůůLJƐĞƌǀŝŶŐĂƐĂŶĞdžƚĞŶƐŝŽŶŽĨƐƚĂīĨŽƌĂǀĂƌŝĞƚLJŽĨĂƐƐŝŐŶŵĞŶƚƐ͕ ůĞǀĞƌĂŐŝŶŐĚĞĐĂĚĞƐŽĨĐŽůůĞĐƟǀĞƉƵďůŝĐĂŐĞŶĐLJĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ͘tĞǀĂůƵĞĞĂĐŚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͛ƐƵŶŝƋƵĞŶĞƐƐĂŶĚĞŶƐƵƌĞ ƚŚĂƚƚŚĞKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĮƚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐŶĞĞĚƐ͕ƉŽůŝƟĐĂůĐŽŶƚĞdžƚ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJǀĂůƵĞƐ͘tĞůŝƐƚĞŶ͕ ĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƚĞ͕ĂŶĚďƌŝŶŐƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐƚŽƚŚĞƚĂďůĞƚŚĂƚƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶĂŚŝŐŚƋƵĂůŝƚLJ͕ďƵŝůƚƉƌŽĚƵĐƚ͘ Jami Williams
Principal-in-Charge
DĂŶĂŐŝŶŐWĂƌƚŶĞƌ
Katja Dillmann, AICP, JD
Project Manager
^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌŝŶWůĂŶŶŝŶŐΘ
hƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
RRM Design Group
Architecture Landscape Architecture
Scott Martin,
AIA, LEED AP, CNU-A
Architect + Urban Designer
DĂŶĂŐŝŶŐWĂƌƚŶĞƌ
Debbie Jewell, PLA
Landscape Architect +
Urban Design
^ĞŶŝŽƌhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶĞƌ
18.a
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) WĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů͕
ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚ&ĂĐŝůŝƟĞƐ | Section 7 27
Managing Partner with
28 years of experience
Education
• Master of Business
ĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƟŽŶ͕ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
Management Track, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, San Luis
Obispo, CA
• Bachelor of Architecture,
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo,
San Luis Obispo, CA
• Semester Design Program,
Ecole Des Beaux Art
Americaines
De Fontainebleau, France
• Associate of Science, Cuyamaca
College, San Diego, CA
California, Davis, CA
Licenses and more
• ŵĞƌŝĐĂŶWůĂŶŶŝŶŐƐƐŽĐŝĂƟŽŶ
(APA), Member
• hƌďĂŶ>ĂŶĚ/ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞ;h>/Ϳ͕
Associate Member
Jami Williams
Project Role: Principal-in-Charge
ƐĂůĞĂĚŝŶŐƵƌďĂŶƉůĂŶŶĞƌĂŶĚDĂŶĂŐŝŶŐWĂƌƚŶĞƌĂƚZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉ͕ :ĂŵŝtŝůůŝĂŵƐďƌŝŶŐƐĂǁĞĂůƚŚŽĨĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞƚŽĞĂĐŚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŚĞ͛ƐŝŶǀŽůǀĞĚ in. With a bachelor’s degree in architecture, a master’s in business ĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƟŽŶ͕ĂŶĚŽǀĞƌϮϱLJĞĂƌƐĂƐĂŶƵƌďĂŶƉůĂŶŶĞƌ͕:ĂŵŝďƌŝŶŐƐĂ ƵŶŝƋƵĞƉĞƌƐƉĞĐƟǀĞƚŚĂƚĞŶĂďůĞƐŚĞƌƚŽĂĚǀĂŶĐĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĞĂƌůLJ visioning and policy stages through a process that builds consensus ĂŶĚƌĞƐƵůƚƐŝŶƐƵĐĐĞƐƐĨƵůŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ͘dŚŝƐĐŽŵďŝŶĞĚǁŝƚŚŚĞƌǀĂƐƚ ĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŝŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚǁŽƌŬƉƌŽĚƵĐƚƌĞƐƵůƟŶŐŝŶŝŶĮůůĂŶĚ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐ͕ŵƵůƟŵŽĚĂůƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů ũƵƐƟĐĞ͕ĞƋƵŝƚLJ͕ƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJ͕ĂŶĚƐŵĂƌƚŐƌŽǁƚŚŝŶŝƟĂƟǀĞƐŚĂƐďĞŶĞĮƚĞĚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͘:Ăŵŝ͛ƐĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĐůŝĞŶƚƐ͛ ǀŝƐŝŽŶƐĂŶĚŶĞĞĚƐŝŶƚŽĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJďĞŶĞĮĐŝĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶŵĂŬĞƐŚĞƌŽŶĞŽĨ RRM’s most trusted urban planners.
Featured project experience
• Santa Clarita Community
Character and Design
Guidelines (2001 and 2008)
• Santa Clarita Community
Center Feasibility Study
• Santa Clarita Design Review
ϭϵϵϵͲϮϬϮϮ
• Santa Clarita Landscape
Maintenance Districts
ĞĂƵƟĮĐĂƟŽŶ
• ůŚĂŵďƌĂKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards and Design
Guidelines
• ƌĐĂĚŝĂEĞǁKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
and Development Standards
• ĂƌůƐďĂĚKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards
• ƵƉĞƌƟŶŽZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůͬDŝdžĞĚͲ
hƐĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
• ƵďůŝŶŝƚLJǁŝĚĞDƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ
Design Standards
• El Cajon Housing Element
ZĞnjŽŶŝŶŐWƌŽŐƌĂŵDŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞ
ŽŶĞdĞƐƟŶŐ
• El Monte Zoning Code and
ĞƐŝŐŶ'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐhƉĚĂƚĞ
•
ŶĐŝŶŝƚĂƐ^ϮWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ'ƌĂŶƚ
;KďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐͿ
• 'ŽůĞƚĂKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌDƵůƟƉůĞǁĞůůŝŶŐ
ĂŶĚDŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ
• >ĂDŝƌĂĚĂKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards
• Morro Bay Housing Element
/ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶWƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ;^Ϯ
ĂŶĚZ
WWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ'ƌĂŶƚͿ
• WĂƐĂĚĞŶĂhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
ŽŶƐƵůƟŶŐ
• dĞŵƉůĞŝƚLJZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards
• sŝƐƚĂKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards and Zoning Code
Amendments
• tĞƐƚ,ŽůůLJǁŽŽĚhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
WƌŽŐƌĂŵ
• Yucaipa Citywide Design
'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐͬKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards
18.a
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 28 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Supervisor in Planning
& Urban Design with 11
years of experience
Education
• Masters in City Planning,
San Diego State University,
San Diego, CA
• Juris Doctor, Lewis & Clark Law
School, OR
• Bachelor of Arts, English
and German,University of
California, Davis, CA
• Minor in Environmental Policy
and Planning, University of
California, Davis, CA
Licenses and more
• ŵĞƌŝĐĂŶ/ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨĞƌƟĮĞĚ
Planners (AICP), CA, 33721
*Work performed prior to joining
RRM Design Group
Katja Dillmann, AICP, JD
Project Role: Project Manager
<ĂƚũĂŝůůŵĂŶŶ͕ĂƚƌĂŝŶĞĚůĂǁLJĞƌĂŶĚĐŝƚLJƉůĂŶŶĞƌ͕ďƌŝŶŐƐĂŶĞŶƌŝĐŚŝŶŐ ƉĞƌƐƉĞĐƟǀĞƚŽZZD͛ƐWůĂŶŶŝŶŐƚĞĂŵ͘,ĞƌĐŽŵŵŝƚŵĞŶƚƚŽĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ impact and inclusivity informs much of her work. As an avid traveler, ĂŶĚŚĂǀŝŶŐŐƌŽǁŶƵƉĂƐĂƚŚŝƌĚĐƵůƚƵƌĞŬŝĚ͕<ĂƚũĂ͛ƐǁŽƌŬŝƐĐƌĞĂƟǀĞůLJ ŝŶŇƵĞŶĐĞĚďLJƚŚĞƐƵĐĐĞƐƐĨƵůŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶƐŽĨhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶŝŶŽƚŚĞƌ ĐŽƵŶƚƌŝĞƐ͘ƌĂǁŝŶŐŽŶŚĞƌĞdžƚĞŶƐŝǀĞďĂĐŬŐƌŽƵŶĚĂŶĚƵŶŝƋƵĞƉĞƌƐƉĞĐƟǀĞ͕ ŝŶŚĞƌƌŽůĞĂƐWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ͕<ĂƚũĂǁŝůůƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞŝƚ ƐƚĂLJƐŽŶƟŵĞĂŶĚŽŶďƵĚŐĞƚ͘
Featured project experience
• ůŚĂŵďƌĂKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards and Design
Guidelines
• ĂƌůƐďĂĚKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards
• Carson Economic Development
^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐWůĂŶ
• ŚƵůĂsŝƐƚĂĐƟǀĞ
dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶWůĂŶΎ
• ŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞĐƟǀĞ
dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶWůĂŶ͕ŽƌŽŶĂĚŽΎ
• ƵůǀĞƌŝƚLJh,ĂŶĚŬ
•
ůĂũŽŶĐƟǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ
WůĂŶΎ
• ƵƉĞƌƟŶŽZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůͬDŝdžĞĚͲ
hƐĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
• ĂŶĂWŽŝŶƚ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ
Outreach
•
ŶĐŝŶŝƚĂƐ^ϮWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ'ƌĂŶƚ
;KďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐͿ
•
ƐĐŽŶĚŝĚŽWƵďůŝĐƌƚDĂƐƚĞƌ
WůĂŶ
• :ƵƌƵƉĂsĂůůĞLJh,ĂŶĚŬ
• La Mesa Boulevard Complete
^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ͕>ĂDĞĂƐΎ
• >ĂDŝƌĂĚĂKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards and Design
Guidelines
• >ĂŶĐĂƐƚĞƌWƵďůŝĐƌƚƐDĂƐƚĞƌ
WůĂŶ
• WĂƩĞƌƐŽŶŽǁŶƚŽǁŶDĂƐƚĞƌ
WůĂŶ
• ^ĂŶƚĞĞDŽďŝůŝƚLJ
ůĞŵĞŶƚΎ
• San Marcos Richmar Senior
Village
• Torrance Housing Element
/ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ
• tŝůĚŽŵĂƌDŽďŝůŝƚLJWůĂŶΎ
18.a
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) WĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů͕
ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚ&ĂĐŝůŝƟĞƐ | Section 7 29
Managing Partner with
23 years of experience
Education
• Bachelor of Architecture,
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo, CA
Licenses and more
• Architect, CA, C32348
• Architect, CO, 00405508
• Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design
Accredited Professional
(LEED AP)
• Congress for the New Urbanism
Accredited (CNU-A)
• ŵĞƌŝĐĂŶ/ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƐ
(AIA)
• San Luis Obispo Chamber
of Commerce Economic
ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽŵŵŝƩĞĞ
Scott Martin, AIA, LEED AP, CNU-A
Project Role: Architect + Urban Designer
ƐDĂŶĂŐŝŶŐWĂƌƚŶĞƌ͕^ĐŽƩDĂƌƟŶďƌŝŶŐƐŽǀĞƌƚǁĞŶƚLJLJĞĂƌƐŽĨǀĂůƵĂďůĞ ĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞƚŽZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉ͘&ƌŽŵƵƌďĂŶĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƚŽ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ͕^ĐŽƩ͛ƐĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞƌĂŶŐĞƐĨĂƌĂŶĚ ǁŝĚĞ͘Ŷ>
ĐĐƌĞĚŝƚĞĚWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů͕ŚŝƐĚĞƐŝŐŶƐŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĐƌĞĂƟǀĞ ĂŶĚƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶƚŽŚŝƐƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞ͕^ĐŽƩ ŝƐĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƚŽŵĞĞƟŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŝŽƌŝƟĞƐĂŶĚŶĞĞĚƐŽĨƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ ,ŝƐĐůŽƐĞƌĞůĂƟŽŶƐŚŝƉǁŝƚŚďŽƚŚƉƵďůŝĐĂŶĚƉƌŝǀĂƚĞĐůŝĞŶƚƐŽīĞƌƐŚŝŵĂ ĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞǀŝĞǁŽĨĞĂĐŚƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ƚŚŽƵŐŚƞƵůůĞĂĚĞƌĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶĞƌ͕ ^ĐŽƩDĂƌƟŶďƌŝŶŐƐĂŶĂůůͲĞŶĐŽŵƉĂƐƐŝŶŐƉĞƌƐƉĞĐƟǀĞƚŽƚŚĞĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ team at RRM.
Featured project experience
• Santa Clarita Community
Center Feasibility Study
• Santa Clarita Design Review
(2010 and 2013)
• ůŚĂŵďƌĂKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards and Design
Guidelines
• ƌĐĂĚŝĂEĞǁKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
and Development Standards
• Balboa Village Design
Guidelines, Streetscape
/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶ͕ĂŶĚ
tĂLJĮŶĚŝŶŐ^ŝŐŶWƌŽŐƌĂŵ^ĂŶ
Diego
• ĂƌůƐďĂĚKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards
• ĞƌƌŝƚŽƐZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĞƐŝŐŶ
Manual
• ƵďůŝŶŝƚLJǁŝĚĞDƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ
Design Standards
• El Cajon Housing Element
ZĞnjŽŶŝŶŐWƌŽŐƌĂŵDŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞ
ŽŶĞdĞƐƟŶŐ
•
ŶĐŝŶŝƚĂƐ^ϮWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ'ƌĂŶƚ
;KďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐͿ
• 'ŽůĞƚĂKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌDƵůƟƉůĞǁĞůůŝŶŐ
ĂŶĚDŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ
• >ĂDŝƌĂĚĂKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards
• >ŽŶŐĞĂĐŚhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚKŶͲĂůůWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
Services
• DŝƐƐŝŽŶŽǀĞDŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞ
ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚīŽƌĚĂďůĞ
Housing, San Diego
• WĂƐĂĚĞŶĂhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
ŽŶƐƵůƟŶŐ
• WŽƌƚĞƌǀŝůůĞĐĐĞƐƐŽƌLJǁĞůůŝŶŐ
hŶŝƚĂŶĚDƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJǁĞůůŝŶŐ
hŶŝƚWůĂŶƐ
• dĞŵƉůĞŝƚLJhƐĞƌ'ƵŝĚĞ&Žƌ
DƵůƟͲ&ĂŵŝůLJWƌŽƚŽƚLJƉĞƐ
• Thousand Oaks Boulevard
^ƉĞĐŝĮĐWůĂŶDŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞ
Feasibility Analysis
• tĞƐƚ,ŽůůLJǁŽŽĚhƌďĂŶ
ĞƐŝŐŶWƌŽŐƌĂŵ
• Yorba Linda Housing Element
/ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶWƌŽŐƌĂŵ
;DƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJĞƐŝŐŶ'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐͿ
• Yucaipa Citywide Design
'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐͬKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards
18.a
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 30 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Senior Urban Designer
with 30 years of
experience
Education
• Bachelor of Landscape
Architecture, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, CA
• Associate of Arts, Fine Arts,
ƌĂǁŝŶŐĂŶĚWĂŝŶƟŶŐ͕
Academy of Art College, San
Francisco, CA
Licenses and more
• Professional Landscape
Architect, CA, 5308
Debbie Jewell, PLA
Project Role: Landscape Architect + Urban Designer
tŝƚŚŽǀĞƌƚǁŽĚĞĐĂĚĞƐŽĨĚĞƐŝŐŶĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ͕ĞďďŝĞ:ĞǁĞůďƌŝŶŐƐĂŶ ĂƌƟƐƟĐĞLJĞƚŽZZD͛ƐhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶƚĞĂŵ͘ŽƚŚŚĞƌůŽǀĞŽĨƚŚĞŽƵƚĚŽŽƌƐ ĂŶĚƐŚĂƌƉĂƌƟƐƟĐƐĞŶƐĞĐƵůŵŝŶĂƚĞŝŶĨƵŶĐƟŽŶĂůĂŶĚĂĞƐƚŚĞƟĐĂůůLJ ďĞĂƵƟĨƵůĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘ƐĂůŝĐĞŶƐĞĚůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚ͕ĞďďŝĞŚĂƐĂ ĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞǀŝĞǁŽĨĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘,ĞƌǁŽƌŬĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞƐƉĂŶƐĨƌŽŵƵƚŽ ŵĂƉƉŝŶŐĂŶĚƚƌĂŝůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƚŽƐƉĞĐŝĮĐĂŶĚŵĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ She’s worked on streetscape master plans and provided design review ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŝƟĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞƐƚĂƚĞ͘tŝƚŚĂŶĞdžƉĂŶƐŝǀĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞ ĂŶĚĂŬĞĞŶĂƩĞŶƟŽŶƚŽĚĞƚĂŝů͕ĞďďŝĞĞŶƐƵƌĞƐƌĞůŝĂďůĞĂŶĚĞLJĞͲĐĂƚĐŚŝŶŐ results for each project she works.
Featured project experience
• Santa Clarita Community
Character and Design
Guidelines
• Santa Clarita Design Review
Services
• Santa Clarita Community
Center Feasibility Study
• ůŚĂŵďƌĂEĞǁŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ
Zoning Code
• ƌĐĂĚŝĂEĞǁKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
and Development Standards
• Brentwood Zoning Ordinance
hƉĚĂƚĞ
• ĂƌůƐďĂĚKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Standards
• Carpinteria Downtown Design
KǀĞƌůĂLJWƌŽŐƌĂŵ
• Carson Economic Development
^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐWůĂŶ
• ĂƌƐŽŶKŶͲĂůůĞƐŝŐŶZĞǀŝĞǁ
• ƵƉĞƌƟŶŽZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůͬDŝdžĞĚͲ
hƐĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
• ƵďůŝŶŝƚLJǁŝĚĞDƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ
Design Standards
•
ůDŽŶƚĞKŶͲĂůůƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů
ĂŶĚ>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞZĞǀŝĞǁ;ϮϬϮϭͲ
2024)
•
ů^ĞŐƵŶĚŽŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ^ƉĞĐŝĮĐ
WůĂŶhƉĚĂƚĞ
•
ŶĐŝŶŝƚĂƐ^ϮWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ'ƌĂŶƚ
;KďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐͿ
• 'ŽůĞƚĂKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ
^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌDƵůƟƉůĞǁĞůůŝŶŐ
ĂŶĚDŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ
• Goleta Zoning Ordinance and
>ŽĐĂůŽĂƐƚĂůWƌŽŐƌĂŵhƉĚĂƚĞ
;ϮϬϭϳͲϮϬϭϵͿ
• Hermosa Beach Zoning and
^ƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞhƉĚĂƚĞ
• Morro Bay Housing Element
/ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶWƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ;^Ϯ
ĂŶĚZ
WWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ'ƌĂŶƚͿ
• EĞǁĂƌŬŽŶŝŶŐKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ
hƉĚĂƚĞ
• EĞǁŵĂŶ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJϯϯ^ƉĞĐŝĮĐ
WůĂŶhƉĚĂƚĞ
• WĂƩĞƌƐŽŶŽǁŶƚŽǁŶDĂƐƚĞƌ
WůĂŶ
• WŽƌƚ,ƵĞŶĞŵĞ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ
hƉĚĂƚĞ
• Rosemead Freeway Corridor
DŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞKǀĞƌůĂLJŽŶĞ
• Ventura Main Street Moves
Design Guidelines
• Vista Zoning Code
Amendments
18.a
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 31 Section Seven:
Subconsultants
Proposal For SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
WŝĐƚƵƌĞĚ͗DŝƐƐŝŽŶŽǀĞDŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚīŽƌĚĂďůĞ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕^ĂŶŝĞŐŽ͕ Please note: RRM does not intend to team with any subconsultants for the SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project. All services will be provided by our in-house planners, urban designers, architects, and landscape architects.
18.a
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
18.a
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 33 8
Section Eight:
Experience on Similar Projects
Proposal for
SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
WŝĐƚƵƌĞĚ͗
WĂƐĞŽŚĂƉĂůĂDŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕
^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂ͕
18.a
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 34 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
PRECAST CONCRETE
POINTED CAP
PAINT SIMULATED
BRUSHED
BRONZE FINISH
DECORATIVE
PLANTING AT BASE
CONTEMPORARY
LEDGER STONE
RAISED
BLACK METAL
ILLUMINATED
LETTERING
Valencia Town Center
Valencia Auto Center
City Hall
V
V
C
We Know Santa Clarita
&ŽƌŽǀĞƌƚǁŽĚĞĐĂĚĞƐ͕ǁĞŚĂǀĞǁŽƌŬĞĚĂůŽŶŐƐŝĚĞƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂƚŽƐŚĂƉĞĂŶĚƌĞĮŶĞŝƚƐĚĞƐŝŐŶ ǀŝƐŝŽŶ͕ĞŶƐƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĂƚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƌĞŇĞĐƚƐƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͛ƐĞǀŽůǀŝŶŐĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌ͕ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĂƐƉŝƌĂƟŽŶƐ͘ dŚƌŽƵŐŚĐŽŶƟŶƵŽƵƐĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƟŽŶ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƌĞǀŝĞǁƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĞīŽƌƚƐ͕ǁĞŚĂǀĞŚĞůƉĞĚĞůĞǀĂƚĞƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͛ƐĂĞƐƚŚĞƟĐĂŶĚĨƵŶĐƟŽŶĂůƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐǁŚŝůĞƐƚĂLJŝŶŐĂƩƵŶĞĚƚŽŝƚƐŐƌŽǁƚŚĂŶĚĐŚĂŶŐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐ͘Ɛ^ĂŶƚĂ ůĂƌŝƚĂĐŽŶƟŶƵĞƐƚŽŵĂƚƵƌĞ͕ƚŚĞŝŶƚƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶŽĨŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂŶĞǁƚŽŽůƚŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŝƚƐ ŝĚĞŶƟƚLJ͕ĞŶŚĂŶĐĞĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶĐLJ͕ĂŶĚŐƵŝĚĞŚŝŐŚͲƋƵĂůŝƚLJĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘KƵƌůŽŶŐͲƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƌĞŇĞĐƚƐĂ ƐŚĂƌĞĚĐŽŵŵŝƚŵĞŶƚƚŽƚŚŽƵŐŚƞƵů͕ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJͲĚƌŝǀĞŶĚĞƐŝŐŶƚŚĂƚďĂůĂŶĐĞƐƉƌŽŐƌĞƐƐǁŝƚŚƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƟŽŶ͘ 1 4
ϭ͘ ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂĞƐŝŐŶ'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ;ϮϬϬϭͿ
Ϯ͘ ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌĂŶĚ
ĞƐŝŐŶ'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ;ϮϬϬϴͿ
ϯ͘ ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂĞĂƵƟĮĐĂƟŽŶWůĂŶ
ϰ͘ ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂĞƐŝŐŶZĞǀŝĞǁ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ϱ͘ ƌŽƐƐsĂůůĞLJŽŶŶĞĐƚŽƌĞƐƚŚĞƟĐƐWůĂŶ
Santa Clarita Projects
2 3 5
18.a
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
džƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŽŶ^ŝŵŝůĂƌWƌŽũĞĐƚƐ | Section 8 35
Objective Design Standards
ZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉŚĂƐǁŽƌŬĞĚŽŶƉƌĞƉĂƌŝŶŐƚŚĞŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŚĂƚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞŚŝŐŚͲƋƵĂůŝƚLJĚĞƐŝŐŶ ĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚĂŶĚƋƵĂŶƟƚĂƟǀĞĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶƚŽŐƵŝĚĞƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶŽĨĨƵƚƵƌĞŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJĂŶĚŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͘ Unit Type #1 - Front Elevation Unit Type #3 - Front Elevation Massing elements at entries appear “tacked on”.
Revise to make massing appear more integral or
UH¿QHHQWU\PDVVLQJGHVLJQ
Cantilevered elements appear
supported by rafters/corbels.
Entry integrated into design
and highlighted through
appropriately attached
elements.
Third-story setback alternated
to provide appearance of twoand three-story elements.
Third-story recessed behind
Front Elevation to minimize
appearance and emphasize
pedestrian scale.
Example Three-Story Residential
City of Carlsbad
Multifamily Housing and
Mixed-Use Development
Objective Design
Standards Manual
ϭ͘ ƵƉĞƌƟŶŽZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůͬDŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞĞƐŝŐŶ
^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
Ϯ͘ Yucaipa Citywide Design Guidelines
ϯ͘ DŽƌƌŽĂLJ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ
/ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶWƌŽŐƌĂŵ
ϰ͘ njƵƐĂdK^ƉĞĐŝĮĐWůĂŶ
ϱ͘ ƵďůŝŶKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚ
hWƌŽƚŽƚLJƉĞƐ
ϲ͘ ĂƌůƐďĂĚDƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJΘDŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞ
ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
Objective Design Standard Projects
1 3
6 2
4 5
18.a
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 36 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Mixed-Use and Multifamily Development
KŶĞŽĨƚŚĞŵŽƐƚŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚĚŝƐƟŶŐƵŝƐŚŝŶŐĨĂĐƚŽƌƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶZZDĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚƐŝƐŽƵƌƉŽƌƞŽůŝŽŽĨ architectural projects that we bring to the assignment. We not only know how to write design standards and guidelines, but we implement them. We know how to get things built. 1 2
ϭ͘ ĂƐĂƐ>ĂƐ'ƌĂŶĂĚĂƐīŽƌĚĂďůĞ
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂ
Ϯ͘ DŽLJůĂŶdĞƌƌĂĐĞDƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕^ĂŶ>ƵŝƐKďŝƐƉŽ
ϯ͘ DĂƌƐŚ^ƚƌĞĞƚDŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞ͕^ĂŶ>ƵŝƐ
Obispo
ϰ͘ ǀŝůĂKĂŬƐDƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕
ǀŝůĂĞĂĐŚ
ϱ͘ :ĂƌĚŝŶĚĞůĂZŽƐĂƐīŽƌĚĂďůĞ
DƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂ
Mixed-Use & Multifamily Projects
3 4 5
18.a
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
džƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŽŶ^ŝŵŝůĂƌWƌŽũĞĐƚƐ | Section 8 37
Goleta Multiple-Unit and Mixed-Use
Objective Design Standards
The City of Goleta, with support from RRM Design Group, developed ŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŽŵĞĞƚ^ϯϱƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘dŚĞŝƚLJĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚ thorough outreach with the community and with the City’s Design Review ŽĂƌĚƚŽƐƵĐĐĞƐƐĨƵůůLJŐƵŝĚĞƚŚĞƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘'ŝǀĞŶƚŚĞ ƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůŶĂƚƵƌĞŽĨnjŽŶŝŶŐĐŽĚĞƐĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƚŚĞƚĞĂŵƉƌŝŽƌŝƟnjĞĚ ĞĚƵĐĂƟŶŐƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŽŶŚŽǁĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂīĞĐƚƚŚĞůŽŽŬĂŶĚĨĞĞůŽĨ the community and how they can raise the bar of development for local designers and applicants.
dŽĐƌĂŌ͞ĐůĞĂƌĂŶĚŵĞĂƐƵƌĂďůĞ͟ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŚĂƚƵƉŚŽůĚƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶǀĂůƵĞƐĂŶĚ ŚĞƌŝƚĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͕ZZDĚƌĞǁƵƉŽŶĞdžŝƐƟŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐĂŶĚ ǀŝƐƵĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͘dŚĞƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶǀŽůǀĞĚĂ͞ƚƌĂŶƐůĂƟŽŶ͟ŽĨďƌŽĂĚĂŶĚ ƐƵďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶŝŶƚŽƐƉĞĐŝĮĐĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘dŚĞƚĞĂŵ ĐƌĞĂƚĞĚŐƌĂƉŚŝĐƐƚŚĂƚŝůůƵŵŝŶĂƚĞĚďĂƐŝĐĚĞƐŝŐŶĐŽŶĐĞƉƚƐĂŶĚĐůĂƌŝĮĞĚĐŽŵŵŽŶ ƋƵĞƐƟŽŶƐ͘dŚĞKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐǁĞƌĞĂĚŽƉƚĞĚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛Ɛ DƵŶŝĐŝƉĂůŽĚĞŝŶEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϬϮϮ͘
Client & Location
ŝƚLJŽĨ'ŽůĞƚĂ͕
The RRM Teams Involved
ͻ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐΘhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
ͻ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
ͻ >ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
Key Features & Elements
ͻ KďũĞĐƚŝǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
ͻ DƵůƚŝƉůĞͲhŶŝƚ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ͻ hƐĞƌDĂŶƵĂů
Project Timeline
ϮϬϮϭͲϮϬϮϯ
OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS
ƵŝůĚŝŶŐĞƐŝŐŶdŽƉŝĐƐ͗
• &Žƌŵ͕ŵĂƐƐŝŶŐĂŶĚĂƌƟĐƵůĂƟŽŶ
• tĂůůƉůĂŶĞĂŶĚƌŽŽŇŝŶĞǀĂƌŝĂƟŽŶ
• ƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂŶĚĚǁĞůůŝŶŐƵŶŝƚĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƐ
• tŝŶĚŽǁƐĂŶĚĚŽŽƌƐ
• DĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂŶĚĐŽůŽƌƐ
• WĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ͕ŐĂƌĂŐĞƐ
ĂŶĚĐĂƌƉŽƌƚƐ
^ŝƚĞĞƐŝŐŶdŽƉŝĐƐ͗
• ƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚŽƌŝĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ
• sĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐ
• >ŽĂĚŝŶŐĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƌĞĂƐ
• WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĐŝƌĐƵůĂƟŽŶĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐ
• ŽŵŵŽŶĂŶĚƌĞƐƚƌŝĐƚĞĚ
ŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞ
• >ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ
DŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞĞƐŝŐŶdŽƉŝĐƐ͗
• 'ƌŽƵŶĚŇŽŽƌŚĞŝŐŚƚĂŶĚ
ƚƌĂŶƐƉĂƌĞŶĐLJ
• ^ƚƌĞĞƚͲĨĂĐŝŶŐƐĞƚďĂĐŬƐĂŶĚ
ĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƐ
hƟůŝƚĂƌŝĂŶĞƐŝŐŶdŽƉŝĐƐ͗
• ŝĐLJĐůĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ
• dƌĂƐŚƌĞĐLJĐůŝŶŐĂŶĚŐƌĞĞŶ
ǁĂƐƚĞĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĞƌƐ
• &ĞŶĐŝŶŐĂŶĚǁĂůůƐ
• >ŝŐŚƟŶŐ
CHAPTER 17.44 REQUIREMENTS
ĞƐŝŐŶƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐĨŽƌŶĞǁŵƵůƟƉůĞͲƵŶŝƚ
ĂŶĚŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
Best Practices Award, City
of Goleta, Multiple-Unit and
Mixed-Use Objective Design
Standards
WĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͕ĞŶƚƌĂůŽĂƐƚ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ
18.a
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 38 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Client & Location
ŝƚLJŽĨĂƌůƐďĂĚ͕
The RRM Teams Involved
ͻ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐΘhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
ͻ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
ͻ >ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
Key Features & Elements
ͻ KďũĞĐƚŝǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
ͻ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ
ĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶ
ͻ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ
ŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ
ͻ ^ƚĂĨĨdƌĂŝŶŝŶŐ
ͻ tĞďƐŝƚĞŽŶƚĞŶƚ
Project Timeline
ϮϬϮϭͲϮϬϮϰ
Carlsbad Objective Design Standards
dŽĐŽŵƉůLJǁŝƚŚƌĞĐĞŶƚ^ƚĂƚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐůĞŐŝƐůĂƟŽŶŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ^ĞŶĂƚĞŝůůϯϱĂŶĚ ^ĞŶĂƚĞŝůůϯϯϬ͕ƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨĂƌůƐďĂĚŝŶŝƟĂƚĞĚĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐƚŽŝƚƐŽŶŝŶŐ KƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ͘/ŶǀĞŶƟǀĞƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐǁĞƌĞŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐƚŚĞƐŚŽƌƚĂŐĞŽĨ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ĂůůǁŚŝůĞƉƌĞƐĞƌǀŝŶŐƚŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨĞdžŝƐƟŶŐŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͘ ZZDĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŚĂƚƐĂƟƐĮĞĚƚŚĞƐĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĨŽƌŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJĂŶĚŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐǁŚŝůĞŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƟŶŐĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĚĞƐŝŐŶŐƵŝĚĂŶĐĞĨŽƵŶĚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐϮϬнƐƉĞĐŝĮĐƉůĂŶƐĂŶĚŵĂƐƚĞƌ plans.
ZZDƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚƚŚĞŝƚLJǁŝƚŚƌŽďƵƐƚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶĞīŽƌƚƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ĂŶŽŶůŝŶĞƐƵƌǀĞLJ͕ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĂůǀŝĚĞŽ͕ƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌŝŶƚĞƌǀŝĞǁƐ͕WůĂŶŶŝŶŐ Commission study session, and open house to gather input on the standards. dŽĞŶƐƵƌĞĞīĞĐƟǀĞŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ͕ZZDĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞĚĂĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ ƚƌĂŝŶŝŶŐƐĞƐƐŝŽŶǁŝƚŚŝƚLJƐƚĂī͕ƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐƚŽŽůƐĨŽƌĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƌĞǀŝĞǁ ĂŶĚƉƵďůŝĐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƟŽŶ͘&ƌĞƋƵĞŶƚůLJƐŬĞĚYƵĞƐƟŽŶƐŚĂŶĚŽƵƚǁĂƐĂůƐŽ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶ͘
dŚĞĞŶĚƉƌŽĚƵĐƚǁĂƐĂŐƌĂƉŚŝĐĂůůLJƌŝĐŚ͕ƵƐĞƌͲĨƌŝĞŶĚůLJĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ document intended to provide the public, building, and design professionals, ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬĞƌƐ͕ǁŝƚŚĐůĞĂƌĚĞƐŝŐŶĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶƚŚĂƚƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĞƐ character and sense of place while ensuring predictable and consistent ĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶŽĨĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘
Variation/
projection in
the wall plane
Variation in
fenestration
size/pattern
Property Line
6 Feet Min
Examples of private
recreational space
18.a
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
džƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŽŶ^ŝŵŝůĂƌWƌŽũĞĐƚƐ | Section 8 39
Vista Objective Design Standards and
Zoning Code Amendments
The City of Vista Community Development Department retained RRM to ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĐŽŶƐƵůƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƚŽĮŶĚƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐĨŽƌĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͛ƐŐƌŽǁŝŶŐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĐƌŝƐŝƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶŽĨĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐƚŽƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽĚĞĂŶĚƚŚĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶŽĨŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŚĂƚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞŚŝŐŚͲ ƋƵĂůŝƚLJĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚĂŶĚƋƵĂŶƟƚĂƟǀĞĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶƚŽŐƵŝĚĞƚŚĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶŽĨĨƵƚƵƌĞŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJĂŶĚŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ͘ The project also includes updates to the City’s ordinances related to ĐĐĞƐƐŽƌLJǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚƐĂŶĚĞŶƐŝƚLJŽŶƵƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐŶĞǁ ƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶŝŶŐƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶƐĂŶĚĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƟǀĞƉƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐ͘ZZDǁŽƌŬĞĚǁŝƚŚ ƐƚĂīƚŽƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂŶĞǁ͚ƉƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌLJĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶ͛ĨŽƌŵͬĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚĨŽƌƋƵĂůŝĨLJŝŶŐ housing development projects.
Client & Location
ŝƚLJŽĨsŝƐƚĂ͕
The RRM Teams Involved
ͻ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐΘhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
ͻ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
Key Features & Elements
ͻ KďũĞĐƚŝǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
ͻ DƵůƚŝĨĂŵŝůLJ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ͻ DŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
ͻ ĐĐĞƐƐŽƌLJǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚƐ
Project Timeline
ϮϬϮϭͲWƌĞƐĞŶƚ
18.a
Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 40 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Client & Location:
ŝƚLJŽĨůŚĂŵďƌĂ͕
The RRM Teams Involved
ͻ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ͻ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
ͻ >ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
Key Features & Elements
ͻ KďũĞĐƚŝǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚ
Design Guidelines
ͻ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ
ŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ
Project Timeline
ϮϬϮϰͲWƌĞƐĞŶƚ
Alhambra Objective Design Standards
and Design Guidelines
dŚĞŝƚLJŽĨůŚĂŵďƌĂƌĞĂĐŚĞĚƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚŵŝůĞƐƚŽŶĞƐŝŶĂƉƉƌŽǀŝŶŐĂŶĚĂĚŽƉƟŶŐ ƚŚĞϮϬϰϬ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶŝŶϮϬϭϵĂŶĚƚŚĞŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞŽŶŝŶŐŽĚĞŝŶϮϬϮϰ͘ ZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉǁĂƐĂƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŽƌƚŽďŽƚŚŽĨƚŚĞƐĞĞīŽƌƚƐĂŶĚ ǁĂƐƌĞĐĞŶƚůLJƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘ƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJ͕ƚŚĞ ŝƚLJƐĞĞŬƐŐƌĞĂƚĞƌĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶĐLJĂŶĚĐŽŵƉĂƟďŝůŝƚLJŝŶƵƌďĂŶĚĞƐŝŐŶƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚ ƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘ZZDǁŝůůǁŽƌŬǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJƚŽƌĞĮŶĞĂŶĚƚĂŝůŽƌƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽ ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞĂŶĂƩƌĂĐƟǀĞĂŶĚĂĞƐƚŚĞƟĐĂůůLJ ƉůĞĂƐŝŶŐĐŝƚLJĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͘dŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚǁŽƌŬĞīŽƌƚĞŶƚĂŝůƐĨŽƵƌĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐ͗ ;ϭͿƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚƵƉĚĂƚĞƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƟŶŐĐŝƚLJǁŝĚĞŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŝŶ ůŚĂŵďƌĂDƵŶŝĐŝƉĂůŽĚĞ;͞D͟Ϳ͕;ϮͿĞǀĞůŽƉƐƉĞĐŝĮĐŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌƚǁŽĚŝƐƟŶĐƚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůͬďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐnjŽŶĞƐ͕;ϯͿWƌŽǀŝĚĞĂƵƐĞƌŐƵŝĚĞ ĨŽƌĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ͕ĂŶĚ;ϰͿĞǀĞůŽƉĚĞƐŝŐŶ ŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů͕ŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ͕ĂŶĚŵƵůƟͲĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘
džŝƐƟŶŐ'ƌĂĚĞ
ϮϬŌ͘
&ƌŽŶƚ^ĞƚďĂĐŬ
ϰϬΣ
ĂŶŐůĞ
18.a
Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
džƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŽŶ^ŝŵŝůĂƌWƌŽũĞĐƚƐ | Section 8 41
La Mirada Objective Design Standards
dŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ>ĂDŝƌĂĚĂŚŝƌĞĚZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ;K^ͿĨŽƌŵƵůƟͲĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝǀĞƚŽ^ƚĂƚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ RRM also developed graphics embedded in the code to clarify the standards ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ƚŚĞŝƚLJŚŝƌĞĚZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉƚŽĚƌĂŌĂhƐĞƌ'ƵŝĚĞ ĨŽƌŝƚƐĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůK^ƚŽĂƐƐŝƐƚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĂƐƚŚĞLJ ŶĂǀŝŐĂƚĞƌŽŽŵĂĚĚŝƟŽŶƐŽƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĐĐĞƐƐŽƌLJǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚƐ͘ Client & Location
ŝƚLJŽĨ>ĂDŝƌĂĚĂ͕
The RRM Teams Involved
ͻ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐΘhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
ͻ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
ͻ >ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
Key Features & Elements
ͻ KďũĞĐƚŝǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
Integrated Into Code
ͻ hƐĞƌDĂŶƵĂů
ͻ ^ŝƚĞdŽƵƌtŝƚŚ^ƚĂĨĨ
ͻ
džƉĞĚŝƚĞĚdŝŵĞůŝŶĞ
Project Timeline
ϮϬϮϰͲWƌĞƐĞŶƚ
RECESSED
BALCONY
ROOF HEIGHT
VARIATION
DECORATIVE
DETAIL
BASE FINISH
FACADE
21.080.030 Building Design
A. Building Form, Massing, and Articulation.
1. Building Form and Vertical Hierarchy. Buildings that are three stories or more in height shall be designed WRGLႇHUHQWLDWHEHWZHHQDGH¿QHGEDVH
DPLGGOHRUERG\
DQGDWRSFRUQLFHRUSDUDSHWFDS%XLOGLQJVWZR
VWRULHVRUOHVVVKDOOLQFOXGHDGH¿QHGEDVHDQGDWRSFRUQLFHRUSDUDSHWFDS$OOEXLOGLQJVVKDOODFKLHYHWKLV HႇHFWWKURXJKDWOHDVWWZRRIWKHIROORZLQJ
D&RORUWH[WXUHRUPDWHULDOFKDQJHV
E9DULDWLRQVSURMHFWLRQVRUUHYHDOVLQWKHZDOOSODQH F9DULDWLRQVLQIHQHVWUDWLRQVL]HRUSDWWHUQ
G'HFRUDWLYHDUFKLWHFWXUDOGHWDLOVVXFKDVFRUQLFHVDQGFROXPQV TOP
BASE
MIDDLE
Single-Family Design Criteria User Guide
Ensure that design features, proportions,
and details are consistent with the
architectural style of the primary
residence and complementary to
surrounding neighborhood character.
Acknowledging sensitivity to a budget,
it is expected that the highest level
of articulation will occur on the front
facade and facades visible from public
streets, however some level of varied
texture, relief, and design accents shall
be incorporated into every side of the
building or addition.
Integrate architectural elements that add
visual interest, scale, and character, such
as recessed or projecting balconies,
trellises, recessed windows, insets,
verandas, porches, and changes in
materials and textures to create shadow
patterns that contribute to a building or
addition’s character.
Articulate building facades with windows,
moldings, pilasters, exposed chimneys,
variation of building materials, etc. For
additions and attached ADUs use the
same details as on the primary structure
to create a unified building design.
Section C: Design Direction
ARTICULATION &
ARCHITECTURAL
DETAILING
Articulation and architectural detailing provide human scale by expressing building massing through smaller parts like proportion, ornamentation, and wall plane changes. Additions, remodels to residences, and attached ADUs should be designed to complement the articulation and architectural detailing of the primary residence to ensure an appearance that is integrated with the original structure. 1 1
2 3
4 4
ADDITION
18.a
Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 42 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Dublin Objective Design Standards
and ADU Prototypes
dŚĞŝƚLJŽĨƵďůŝŶŚŝƌĞĚZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĐůĞĂƌůLJĚĞĮŶĞĚ ŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĞŶĚŽƌƐĞĚďLJƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬĞƌƐ ƚŚĂƚĐĂŶďĞĂƉƉůŝĞĚƚŽŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJĂŶĚŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘ dŚĞŝŶƚĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚŶĞǁƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŝƐĐŽŵƉĂƟďůĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͕ƚŚĂƚƋƵĂůŝƚLJŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ are used, that building form and scale are appropriate to the site, and ƚŚĂƚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĐŽŵƉůŝĞƐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝŶƚĞŶƚŽĨ^ĞŶĂƚĞŝůů;^Ϳϯϱ͘dŚĞĮŶĂů ƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĐůĞĂƌůLJǁƌŝƩĞŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐǁŝƚŚĞĂƐLJͲƚŽͲƵƐĞŐƌĂƉŚŝĐƐ͘ZZD͕ ŝŶƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͕ĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐƚƵĚLJƐĞƐƐŝŽŶ ŽŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐĚƌĂŌDƵůƟͲ&ĂŵŝůLJZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů;D&ZͿKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ ƚŽŐĂŝŶĨĞĞĚďĂĐŬŽŶƚŚĞĚƌĂŌƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƉƌŝŽƌƚŽĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬĞƌƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƟŽŶŽĨĂĚŽƉƟŽŶ͘
'ŝǀĞŶƚŚĞůĂĐŬŽĨůĂƌŐĞƐŝƚĞƐĨŽƌŶĞǁŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ƚŚĞŝƚLJŝƐƉƌŽŵŽƟŶŐ ƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨĐĐĞƐƐŽƌLJǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚƐ;hͿ͘dŽĂƐƐŝƐƚŝŶƚŚŝƐĞīŽƌƚ͕ ZZDĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƉƌŽƚŽƚLJƉĞƉůĂŶƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶƐ͕ŇŽŽƌƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌŐĂƌĂŐĞ ĐŽŶǀĞƌƐŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉĞƌŵŝƚƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌhƐƚŽƐĂǀĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŽǁŶĞƌƐ ŵŽŶĞLJ͕ĞdžƉĞĚŝƚĞƚŚĞƉĞƌŵŝƚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͕ĂŶĚŚĞůƉĞŶƐƵƌĞǁĞůůͲĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚhƐĂƌĞ ďƵŝůƚ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ĂŶhƵƐĞƌŐƵŝĚĞǁĂƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĐůĞĂƌƌŽĂĚ ŵĂƉƚŽŝŶĐĞŶƟǀŝnjĞhĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘
Client & Location
ŝƚLJŽĨƵďůŝŶ͕
The RRM Teams Involved
ͻ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐΘhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
ͻ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
ͻ >ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
Key Features & Elements
ͻ KďũĞĐƚŝǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
ͻ DƵůƚŝĨĂŵŝůLJ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ͻ DŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
ͻ ^ϯϱĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞ
ͻ ĐĐĞƐƐŽƌLJǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚƐ
Project Timeline
ϮϬϮϬͲϮϬϮϯ
18.a
Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
džƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŽŶ^ŝŵŝůĂƌWƌŽũĞĐƚƐ | Section 8 43
Cupertino Residential/Mixed-Use
Design Standards and Design
Review Services
/ŶƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞƚŽ^ƚĂƚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐůĞŐŝƐůĂƟŽŶ͕ƚŚĞŝƚLJ
ŽĨƵƉĞƌƟŶŽŚŝƌĞĚZZDƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉŽďũĞĐƟǀĞ
ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů
ĂŶĚŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘ZZD
ĐƌĞĂƚĞĚŽďũĞĐƟǀĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŚĂƚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞ
overall quality for projects built within the
ŝƚLJŽĨƵƉĞƌƟŶŽ͕ĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚƚŚŽƵŐŚƞƵůĂŶĚ
appropriate community outreach, and prepared
environmental documents.
ZZDĂůƐŽĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨƵƉĞƌƟŶŽ
ƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŽŶͲĚĞŵĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƵůƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌ
the architectural review of various development
plans. The goal is to improve the overall quality of the projects built within ƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨƵƉĞƌƟŶŽƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶďLJƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐ ŽďƐĞƌǀĂƟŽŶƐ͕ĐŽŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶƐƚŽĞůĞǀĂƚĞƚŚĞƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨ proposed projects.
Client & Location
ŝƚLJŽĨƵƉĞƌƚŝŶŽ͕
The RRM Teams Involved
ͻ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐΘhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
ͻ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
Key Features & Elements
ͻ KďũĞĐƚŝǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
ͻ DƵůƚŝĨĂŵŝůLJ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ͻ DŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
Project Timeline
ϮϬϮϭͲϮϬϮϯ
Cantilevered elements appear
supported by rafters/corbels.
Entry integrated into design
and highlighted through
appropriately attached
elements.
Third-story setback alternated
to provide appearance of twoand three-story elements.
Third-story recessed behind
Front Elevation to minimize
appearance and emphasize
pedestrian scale.
Example Three-Story Residential
Unit Type #1 - Front Elevation Unit Type #3 - Front Elevation Massing elements at entries appear “tacked on”.
Revise to make massing appear more integral or
5 UH¿QHHQWU\PDVVLQJGHVLJQ
7KHSURMHFWSURSRVHVWZREDOFRQ\DUHDVZLWKLQWKHGHVLJQRQHDWWKHIURQWDQGRQHDW WKHUHDURIWKHVHFRQGVWRU\DQGLQFOXGHVERWKFRYHUHGDQGXQFRYHUHGSRUWLRQV:KLOH EDOFRQLHVDUHSUHVHQWZLWKLQWKHQHLJKERUKRRGDQGDSSURSULDWHWRWKHVHOHFWHG DUFKLWHFWXUDOVW\OHLQFOXGLQJKDOIKHLJKWZDOOZLWKZURXJKWLURQUDLOLQJDWWRSZHKDYH FRQFHUQVZLWKWKHGHVLJQVDVFXUUHQWO\SURSRVHG,QFRPSDULQJ1HZ8SSHU)ORRU3ODQ 6KHHWWRSURMHFWIORRUSODQVXQFOHDUZKHWKHURUQRWIXOOZDOOSURSRVHGDWVRXWKHDVW FRUQHUEDOFRQ\DVSODQVDSSHDUWRVKRZIXOOKHLJKWZDOO0RUHRYHUWKHEDOFRQ\DW VRXWKHDVWFRUQHULVFORVHVWWRH[LVWLQJVLQJOHVWRU\UHVLGHQFHWRWKHVRXWKDQGPD\ SURYLGHXQREVWUXFWHGYLHZVWRSULYDWH\DUGVSDFH$SSOLFDQWVKRXOGUHYLVHEDOFRQ\ GHVLJQDWVRXWKHDVWFRUQHURIEXLOGLQJWRPLQLPL]HYLHZVWRVRXWK7KLVFRXOGLQFOXGH H[WHQGLQJORZZDOOWRILOWHUYLHZVLQWURGXFLQJZRRGWUHOOLVHOHPHQWSRWWHGSODQWVZLWK YHUWLFDOHYHUJUHHQODQGVFDSLQJDQGRUUHGXFLQJVL]HRIEDOFRQ\DPRQJRWKHUSRWHQWLDO GHVLJQLQWHUYHQWLRQV
Upper Floor Plan
Example of tile detailing applied
at front entry door surround.
Pursue integration of addition stylistic appropriate detailing to enhance architectural style.
Heavy wood
elements
with wrought
iron railing.
Decorative Wood corbels.
Shutters.
Gable end detail.
Clarify balcony design at southeast corner.
Appears to show full height wall.
Revise balcony design to minimize views to
VRXWK7KLVFRXOGLQFOXGHORZZDOOWR¿OWHUYLHZV
LQWURGXFLQJZRRGWUHOOLVHOHPHQWSRWWHGSODQWZLWK
YHUWLFDOHYHUJUHHQODQGVFDSLQJDQGRUUHGXFLQJ
VL]HRIEDOFRQ\DPRQJRWKHURSWLRQV
SEPTEMBER 2021 DRAFT
CITY OF CUPERTINO
CITYWIDE OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS
18.a
Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 44 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Encinitas Objective Design Standards
and Streamline Permit Processing
dŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ
ŶĐŝŶŝƚĂƐƌĞƚĂŝŶĞĚZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞŽďũĞĐƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƉĞƌŵŝƫŶŐƚŽĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽĨĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJĂŶĚŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘ZZDĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚĂŶĞīĞĐƟǀĞ community outreach program employing a variety of public engagement tools, including stakeholder interviews, online surveys, a project website, ǀŝĚĞŽĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĚŝŐŝƚĂůŵĞĚŝĂ͘dŚĞŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ ĞdžƚĞŶƐŝǀĞĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƟŽŶǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚĂŶĚĂƉƉŽŝŶƚĞĚŽĸĐŝĂůƐƚŽ ĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐǁĞƌĞƚĂŝůŽƌĞĚƚŽƚŚĞůŽĐĂůĐŽŶƚĞdžƚ͘dŚĞĮŶĂůƉƌŽĚƵĐƚ ƌĞƐƵůƚĞĚŝŶĞĂƐLJͲƚŽͲƵƐĞĂŶĚĞĂƐLJͲƚŽͲĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌŶĞǁŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĐůĞĂƌĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶŽŶƐŝƚĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŵĂƐƐŝŶŐĂŶĚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚƵƟůŝƚĂƌŝĂŶͬŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂůĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ RRM also developed internal training tools, which established a baseline of ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĂŶĚƋƵĂůŝƚLJĨŽƌŝƚLJƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƐƚĂīĂŶĚĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĞĚŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚƉĞƌŵŝƚ ŵŝůĞƐƚŽŶĞƐĂŶĚŝŶƚĞƌĂĐƟŽŶƐǁŝƚŚŽƚŚĞƌĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘
Client & Location
ŝƚLJŽĨ
ŶĐŝŶŝƚĂƐ͕
The RRM Teams Involved
ͻ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐΘhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
ͻ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
ͻ >ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
Key Features & Elements
ͻ KďũĞĐƚŝǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
ͻ Community Outreach
ͻ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ
ĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶ
ͻ ^ƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞĚWƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐ
ͻ Z
ŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ
ͻ ^ƚĂĨĨdƌĂŝŶŝŶŐƐͬ'ƵŝĚĞƐ
Project Timeline
ϮϬϮϬͲϮϬϮϯ
HOW are the Objective
Development Standards different
than the current standards?
Will
objective
development
standards
replace the
zoning code
or other
policy
documents?
• Zoning Code includes development
standards which regulate the
building envelope, such as:
¾ Height
¾ Setbacks
¾ Density/Intensity
¾ Parking Requirements
¾ Signage
City of Encinitas
Multiple-Family & Mixed-Use Residential
Objective Design and Development
Standards
Building
Height
Setback from Street
352-(&72%-(&7,9(6
Create clear and objective development standards to facilitate construction of new housing Update the review and permitting process for new housing, per State law Ensure design of new housing reflects the uniqueness of the existing communities
CITY OF
ENCINITAS
MULTIPLE FAMILY AND
MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL
OBJECTIVE DESIGN AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
WHAT IS AN OBJECTIVE STANDARD?
Objective standards are those that involve no person judgment by a public official or decision maker.
Subjective guidelines demonstrate preferences while allowing discretion and flexibility.
WHAT IS THE PROJECT TIMELINE?
HOW CAN I PARTICIPATE?
There are many ways you can express your ideas and concerns:
Sign up to receive updates
Attend the Virtual Public Workshop and participate in a future survey(s)
Attend/view Planning Commission and City Council Public Hearings
)RUTXHVWLRQV SOHDVHFRQWDFW
-HQQLIHU*DWHV 3ULQFLSDO3ODQQHU
P: (760) 633-2714 E: [email protected]
City of Encinitas,Advanced Planning Division
505 S.Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, CA 92024
Visit the Project website at: www. encinitasca.gov/Housing-Element-Implementation Initiate Project and
Conduct Research
APR 2020
6XEMHFWLYH6WDQGDUGV3ROLF\$QDO\VLV
Draft Objective Design & Development Standards Public Hearings Approval and Adoption
$8*WKURXJK0$<
Existing Subjective Guidelines
Where buffers are desirable between land
uses and to aid in the creation of public
and private space definition, they should
consist primarily of physical space enhanced
by landscaping, or physical barriers such as
walls and fences. (Encinitas Design Guidelines
2.6.1)
Building forms should be designed to create
visual interest. Changes in form accomplished
by varying levels and planes can create a
visually interesting structure while minimizing
the appearance of bulk. (Encinitas Design
Guidelines 5.3.3)
Sample Objective Standards
New residential projects abutting an
existing residential use shall provide native
California drought tolerant landscaping
which will reach a height of 8 ft within
years and/or a wall or fence at least 8 ft.
tall to provide a buffer next to the
property line between the properties.
No building façade (wall) visible
from a public street shall extend
50IW in length without a 5IW minimum
variation in the wall plane
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
California recently adopted legislation to address the State-wide housing shortage. New state laws require the City to review proposed housing primarily based on objective standards, such as specific design requirements, rather than on subjective standards, such as neighborhood character. Subjective design guidelines demonstrate preferences while allowing discretion and flexibility and objective standards are those that involve no personal judgment by a public official or decision maker.
To develop objective standards, the City applied for and received grant funding from the State in early 2020.
With assistance from consultant team RRM Design Group, the City has started the process of translating existing subjective design guidelines into objective development standards.The objective development standards will be utilized in reviewing future multi-family and mixed-use development proposals. Existing zoning will continue to regulate building height, setbacks, density, etc., while the new objective design standards will regulate such criteria as site layout, building orientation, architectural elements, pedestrian connections, etc. to ensure that new housing maintains a design quality reflective of the community.
VS
-8/< 2021
Public Education and Feedback
18.a
Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
džƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŽŶ^ŝŵŝůĂƌWƌŽũĞĐƚƐ | Section 8 45
Pasadena Urban Design Consulting
dŚƌŽƵŐŚĂĐŽŵƉĞƟƟǀĞZ&WƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͕:ĂŵŝtŝůůŝĂŵƐǁĂƐƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚƚŽƐĞƌǀĞ ĂƐĂŶƵƌďĂŶĚĞƐŝŐŶĞƌĨŽƌ ƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨWĂƐĂĚĞŶĂ͛ƐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ͘ƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚŵĂŶĂŐĞƌ͕ƐŚĞĂƐƐŝƐƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĞǀĂůƵĂƟŶŐƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ĞƐŝŐŶZĞǀŝĞǁƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶƐƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞ ĞĸĐŝĞŶĐLJ͕ĞůĞǀĂƚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ĂŶĚĞŶƐƵƌĞĂĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐ͘,Ğƌ ĚƵƟĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ͗
• WƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƟŽŶ;ŝŶĂŶƵƌďĂŶĐŽŶƚĞdžƚͿƌĞůĂƚĞĚ ĂĚǀŝĐĞĂŶĚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶƐ
• 'ƵŝĚŝŶŐƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶŽĨŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ͕ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚ ƉƵďůŝĐŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƌĞůĂƟŶŐƚŽƚŚĞĐŝƚLJǁŝĚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶǀŝƐŝŽŶĂŶĚ ĐŽŶĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛Ɛ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶĂŶĚĂĚŽƉƚĞĚĚĞƐŝŐŶŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ • EĞŐŽƟĂƟŶŐǁŝƚŚĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚƐƚŽĂƐƐƵƌĞĂĞƐƚŚĞƟĐĂŶĚƵƌďĂŶĚĞƐŝŐŶĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ comply with the City’s design guidelines
• Analyzing and developing a new development review process and associated pubic facing and internal department materials Client & Location
ŝƚLJŽĨWĂƐĂĚĞŶĂ͕
The RRM Teams Involved
ͻ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐΘhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
ͻ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
ͻ >ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
“Working with the
professional and talented
firm RRM has been a
pleasure and I would not
hesitate to hire them again
should the City of Pasadena
need their services.”
Ͳ>ĞŽŶtŚŝƚĞ͕WƌŝŶĐŝƉĂůWůĂŶŶĞƌ
ŝƚLJŽĨWĂƐĂĚĞŶĂ
18.a
Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 46 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project West Hollywood Urban
Design Program
/ŶĂŶĞīŽƌƚƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ ƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨtĞƐƚ,ŽůůLJǁŽŽĚ ŚŝƌĞĚZZDĞƐŝŐŶ'ƌŽƵƉƚŽǁŽƌŬĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƟǀĞůLJ ǁŝƚŚƐƚĂīŝŶŽǀĞƌƐĞĞŝŶŐŬĞLJĂƐƉĞĐƚƐŽĨƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐƵƌďĂŶĚĞƐŝŐŶƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ͘ ZZDƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƐƵƉƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂůĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ƵƌďĂŶ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ĂŶĚůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĨŽƌĂĨĞǁĐŚĂůůĞŶŐŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘dŚĞĞīŽƌƚǁĂƐ to ensure that the proposed projects were consistent and architecturally ƐĞŶƐŝƟǀĞƚŽŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ ƚŽƚŚĞŝƌŐĞŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐ ƐĞƫŶŐ͘ƐƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚŝƐǁŽƌŬĞīŽƌƚ͕ZZDƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĂƉĞĞƌƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨƚŚĞtĞƐƚ Hollywood West Overlay Zone and Design Guidelines documents. Our team ĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞĚ͕ĞĚŝƚĞĚ͕ĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞĮŶĂůĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚ͘ Client & Location
ŝƚLJŽĨtĞƐƚ,ŽůůLJǁŽŽĚ͕
The RRM Teams Involved
ͻ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐΘhƌďĂŶĞƐŝŐŶ
ͻ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
Project Timeline
ϮϬϭϰͲϮϬϭϱ
Dark, un-articulated mass draws attention to second
story and feels looming over neighboring properties.
Rendering appears to have a difference in Finished Floor from one house to the other of 4’. Is that true? If the proposed house is actually 4’ taller, the difference between height is being understated and view should be updated.
18.a
Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
džƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŽŶ^ŝŵŝůĂƌWƌŽũĞĐƚƐ | Section 8 47
REFERENCES
PROPOSAL # CD-24-25-22
SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
City of Santa Clarita, California
The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three public agencies for which proposer has performed work of a similar scope and size within the past 3 years. If the instructions on this form conflict with the references requested in the scope of work, the scope of work shall govern. Complete this form out accordingly. Fill out this form completely and upload it with your proposal.
1. __________________________________________________________________________________ Name and Address of Owner / Agency
__________________________________________________________________________________ Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project __________________________________________________________________________________ Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed
2. __________________________________________________________________________________ Name and Address of Owner / Agency
__________________________________________________________________________________ Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project __________________________________________________________________________________ Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed
3. __________________________________________________________________________________ Name and Address of Owner / Agency
__________________________________________________________________________________ Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project __________________________________________________________________________________ Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed
City of *ROHWD&UHPRQD'ULYH6XLWH%*ROHWD&$
City of Dublin, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, CA 94568
Michael Cass (currently with the City of Martinez), (925) 372-3524 $227,130 Multifamily Design Standards 10/30/2023
Andy Newkirk, (805) 961-7500
$170,000 Objective Design Standards 10/30/2023
City of Alhambra, 111 S. First Street, Alhambra, CA 91801 Vanessa Reynoso, (626) 570-5034
$417,450 Objective Design Standards and Design Guidelines In progress
REVISED
SCHEDULE
18.a
Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
18.a
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 49 9
Section Nine:
Statement of Offer and Signature
Proposal for
SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
18.a
Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) Statement of Offer
dŚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĂůŝƐƐƵďŵŝƩĞĚďLJ:ĂŵŝtŝůůŝĂŵƐ͕DĂŶĂŐŝŶŐWĂƌƚŶĞƌ͕ǁŚŽŝƐĚƵůLJĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĞĚƚŽďŝŶĚƚŚĞĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚ ƚŽƚŚĞƚĞƌŵƐĂŶĚĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚŚĞƌĞŝŶ͘dŚĞƵŶĚĞƌƐŝŐŶĞĚĂĸƌŵƐƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĂůĐŽŶƐƟƚƵƚĞƐĂĮƌŵ ŽīĞƌĂŶĚƐŚĂůůƌĞŵĂŝŶǀĂůŝĚĨŽƌĂƉĞƌŝŽĚŽĨϭϮϬĚĂLJƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĚĂƚĞŽĨƐƵďŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ͘&ƵƌƚŚĞƌŵŽƌĞ͕ZZDĂŐƌĞĞƐ ƚŽƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂůůǁŽƌŬĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƐĐŽƉĞŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĂŶŽƚͲƚŽͲĞdžĐĞĞĚƉƌŝĐĞ͕ŝŶĐůƵƐŝǀĞŽĨĂůůĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐ ĂŶĚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚŵĞĞƟŶŐĂƩĞŶĚĂŶĐĞ͘dŚŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ͕ďƵƚŝƐŶŽƚůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚŽ͕ƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŽŶŝŶĂŬŝĐŬͲŽīŵĞĞƟŶŐ͕Ă ƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐ͕ƐƚĂīŵĞĞƟŶŐƐ͕ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŵĞĞƟŶŐƐ͕ĂŶĚƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶƐƚŽƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĂŶĚ City Council, as outlined in the scope of work.
Signature of authorized individual Date
March 25, 2025
50 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
18.a
Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 51 Section Ten:
Appendix - Forms
Proposal For SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
WŝĐƚƵƌĞĚ͗tĞƐƚǀŝĞǁsŝůůĂŐĞ^ĞŶŝŽƌ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕sĞŶƚƵƌĂ͕
18.a
Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 52 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS/SUBCONSULTANTS
PROPOSAL # CD-24-25-22
CD-24-25-22 SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
City of Santa Clarita, California
Listed below are the names and locations of the places of business of each subcontractor, supplier, and vendor who will perform work or labor or render service in excess of ½ of 1 percent, or $10,000 (whichever is greater) of the prime contractor's total bid. If no Subcontractors will be used fill out the form with NA. Please add additional sheets if needed.
Subcontractor DIR Registration No. Dollar Value of Work Location and Place of Business
Bid Schedule Item No’s: Description of Work
License No. Exp. Date: / / Phone ( )
Subcontractor DIR Registration No. Dollar Value of Work Location and Place of Business
Bid Schedule Item No’s: Description of Work
License No. Exp. Date: / / Phone ( )
Subcontractor DIR Registration No. Dollar Value of Work Location and Place of Business
Bid Schedule Item No’s: Description of Work
License No. Exp. Date: / / Phone ( )
NOTE: A contractor or subcontractor shall not be qualified to propose on, be listed in a proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in this chapter, unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 of the Labor Code. It is not a violation of this section for an unregistered contractor to submit a proposal that is authorized by Section 7029.1 of the Business and Professions Code or by Section 10164 or 20103.5 of the Public Contract Code, provided the contractor is registered to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 of the Labor Code at the time the contract is awarded.
N/A N/A N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
18.a
Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) ƉƉĞŶĚŝdžͲ&ŽƌŵƐ | Section 10 53
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT & ACCEPTANCE OF SCOPE OF WORK
PROPOSAL # CD-24-25-22
SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
City of Santa Clarita, California
By providing the three (3) required signatures below, the Contractor acknowledges full understanding, complete agreement to, and accepts in its entirety, all Scope of Work for the SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project.
The Contractor will be expected to perform maintenance practices and uphold the standards herein to the established Scope of Work throughout the length of the contract. *Supervisor’s Signature:___________________________________________Date:__________ *Estimator’s Signature:____________________________________________Date:__________ *Owner’s Signature:______________________________________________Date:__________ *All three signatures required
03/21/2025
03/21/2025
03/21/2025
18.a
Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 54 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
PROPOSAL # CD-24-25-22
SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
City of Santa Clarita, California
The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the Request for Proposals.
2. If any person identified pursuant to No. 1 above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than ten percent of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
3. If any person identified pursuant to No. 1 above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any persons serving as a director of the non-profit organization or as a trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
4. Has the offeror had more than $250.00 worth of business transacted with any member of the City of Santa Clarita staff, boards, commissions, committees, and Council within the past twelve months? If yes, please indicate the person(s) with whom you have conducted business.
NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.
_________________________________
Signature of Offeror
_________________________________
Print or Type Name of Offeror
_________________________________
Date
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Jami Williams
03/21/2025
18.a
Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD)
NOTICE TO PROPOSERS REGARDING CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSAL # CD-24-25-22
SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
City of Santa Clarita, California
1. SUMMARY OF CONTRACTUAL REQUIRMENTS
a. A contract is required for any service performed on behalf of the City of Santa Clarita (City). b. By submitting a proposal, you have reviewed the sample contract documents contained within this request for proposals and agree to be bound by the requirements set forth. c. Questions and requests for modification of these terms must be negotiated and approved prior to proposal submission and are at the full discretion of the City. Requests should be submitted via the Q&A portal on BidNet prior to the deadline for questions and answers.
2. SUMMARY OF INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
a. These are the Indemnity and Insurance Requirements for Contractors providing services or supplies to City of Santa Clarita (City). By agreeing to perform the work or submitting a proposal, you verify that you comply with and agree to be bound by these requirements. If any additional Contract documents are executed, the actual Indemnity language and Insurance Requirements may include additional provisions as deemed appropriate by City’s Purchasing Agent.
b. You should check with your Insurance advisors to verify compliance and determine if additional coverage or limits may be needed to adequately insure your obligations under this agreement. These are the minimum required and do not in any way represent or imply that such coverage is sufficient to adequately cover the Contractor’s liability under this agreement. The full coverage and limits afforded under Contractor’s policies of Insurance shall be available to Buyer and these Insurance Requirements shall not in any way act to reduce coverage that is broader or includes higher limits than those required.
The Insurance obligations under this agreement shall be: 1—all the Insurance coverage and limits carried by or available to the Contractor; or 2—the minimum Insurance requirements shown in this agreement, whichever is greater. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits and coverage required, which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to City. c. Contractor shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to City before work begins. City reserves the right to require full-certified copies of all Insurance coverage and endorsements.
3. INDEMNIFICATION
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall defend (with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to CITY), indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers, agents, departments, officials, representatives and employees (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all claims, loss, cost, damage, injury (including, without limitation, economic harm, injury to or death of an employee of CONSULTANT or its subconsultants), expense and liability of every kind, nature and description that arise ƉƉĞŶĚŝdžͲ&ŽƌŵƐ | Section 10 55
18.a
Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) from or relate to (including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation) that arise from or relate to, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, from: (1) CONSULTANT’s performance of Services under this Agreement, or any part thereof; (2) any negligent act or omission of CONSULTANT, any subconsultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, or anyone that they control; (3) any actual or alleged infringement of the patent rights, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, service mark or any other intellectual or proprietary right of any person or persons in consequence of the use by CITY, or any other Indemnitee, of articles or Services to be supplied in the performance of this Agreement; or (4) any breach of this Agreement (collectively “Liabilities”). Such obligations to defend, hold harmless and indemnify any Indemnitee shall not apply to the extent such Liabilities are caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of such Indemnitee, but shall apply to all other Liabilities. The foregoing shall be subject to the limitations of California Civil Code section 2782.8 as to any design professional services performed by CONSULTANT and in particular the limitation on CONSULTANT’s duty to defend whereby such duty only arises for claims relating to the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT as well as the limitation on the cost to defend whereby CONSULTANT will only bear such cost in proportion to CONSULTANT’s proportionate percentage of fault (except as otherwise provided in section 2782.8). b. The foregoing indemnification provisions will not reduce or affect other rights or obligations which would otherwise exist in favor of the CITY and other Indemnitees. c. CONSULTANT shall place in its subconsulting agreements and cause its subconsultants to agree to indemnities and insurance obligations in favor of CITY and other Indemnitees in the exact form and substance of those contained in this Agreement.
4. INSURANCE
a. Before commencing performance under this Agreement, and at all other times this Agreement is effective, CONSULTANT will procure and maintain the following types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum, with the limits set forth below:
Type of Insurance Limits
Commercial general liability: $1,000,000
Professional liability $1,000,000
Business automobile liability $1,000,000
Workers compensation Statutory requirement
b. Commercial general liability insurance will meet or exceed the requirements of ISO-CGL Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. The amount of insurance set forth above will be a combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage for the policy coverage. Automobile coverage will be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01 06 92, including symbol 1 (Any Auto). Liability policies will be endorsed to name CITY, its officials, and employees as “additional insureds” under said insurance coverage and to state that such insurance will be deemed “primary” such that any other insurance that may be carried by CITY will be excess thereto. Such endorsement must be reflected on ISO Form No. CG 20 10 11 85 or 88, or equivalent. Such insurance will be on an “occurrence,” not a “claims 56 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
18.a
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) made,” basis and will not be cancelable or subject to reduction except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY.
c. Professional liability coverage will be on an “occurrence basis” if such coverage is available, or on a “claims made” basis if not available. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of at least three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect.
d. CONSULTANT will furnish to CITY duly authenticated Certificates of Insurance evidencing maintenance of the insurance required under this Agreement, including endorsements, and such other evidence of insurance or copies of policies as may be reasonably required by CITY from time to time. Insurance must be placed with California-admitted insurers with (other than workers compensation) a current A.M. Best Company Rating of at least “A:VII.”
e. Waiver of Subrogation: The insurer(s) agree to waive all rights of subrogation against CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents, volunteers and employees for losses paid under the terms of the workers compensation policy which arise from work performed by CONSULTANT for CITY. f. Should CONSULTANT, for any reason, fail to obtain and maintain the insurance required by this Agreement, CITY may obtain such coverage at CONSULTANT’s expense and deduct the cost of such insurance from payments due to CONSULTANT under this Agreement or terminate pursuant to TERMINATION section. In the alternative, should CONSULTANT fail to meet any of the insurance requirements under this Agreement, City may terminate this Agreement immediately with no penalty. g. Should CONSULTANT’S insurance required by this Agreement be cancelled at any point prior to expiration of the policy, CONSULTANT must notify City within 24 hours of receipt of notice of cancellation.
Furthermore, CONSULTANT must obtain replacement coverage that meets all contractual requirements within 10 days of the prior insurer’s issuance of notice of cancellation. CONSULTANT must ensure that there is no lapse in coverage.
h. The CITY shall be entitled to any coverage in excess of the minimums required herein.
I have read and understand the above requirements and agree to be bound by them for any work performed for the City.
Authorized Signature: ______________________________ Date: ___________________ Printed Name: ____________________________________ Jami Williams 03/25/2025
ƉƉĞŶĚŝdžͲ&ŽƌŵƐ | Section 10 57
18.a
Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) 58 ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ | Proposal for SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project Addendum No. 1
March 10, 2025
PROPOSAL # CD-24-25-22
Addendum No. 1
PROPOSAL # CD-24-25-22
SCAG Grant REAP 2.0 Project
ŝƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌŝƚĂ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ
dŚŝƐĂĚĚĞŶĚƵŵŵƵƐƚďĞĂĐŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞĚǀŝĂŝĚEĞƚĂŶĚƐŚŽƵůĚďĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĂůƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ͘ The purpose of this addendum is to address the following for this Request for Proposals (RFP):
I. PROPOSAL EXPIRATION
Please note proposals and subsequent offers shall be effective/valid for a period of 120 days after the RFP due date.
END OF ADDENDUM
This addendum must be acknowledged via BidNet and should be included with the response. ____________
ĂƚĞ
____________________________________
ŽŵƉĂŶLJEĂŵĞ
____________________
ŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌ͛ƐZĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞ
RRM Design Group
03/25/2025
18.a
Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT AWARD) Task 1: Project Management and Coordination
Subtask 1.1: Project Kick Off Meeting
Subtask 1.2: Project Management Plan and Schedule
Subtask 1.3: Project Management Meetings
Subtask 1.4: Monthly Invoicing and Reporting
Subtask 1.5: Project Close-Out Files
Subtask 1.6: REAP Metrics Data Collection and Reporting Task 2: Stakeholder Outreach
Subtask 2.1: Stakeholder Outreach and Vision
Subtask 2.2: Stakeholder Workshops
Task 3: Technical Work
Subtask 3.1: Existing Local Policies and Regulations Review Subtask 3.2: Objective Development and Design Standards Subtask 3.3: Housing Development Permit Application
Task 4: Public Hearings
Subtask 4.1: Development Committee
Subtask 4.2: Planning Commission
Subtask 4.3: City Council
Task 5: Final Package
Subtask 5.1: Executive Summary Report
Meeting Deliverable
456 7 8 9 10 11 12
Santa Clarita SCAG Grant REAP 2.0Project ScheduleMarch 25, 2025 rev. 123 59 REVISED SCHEDULE
18.a
Packet Pg. 405
Attachment: RRM Design Group RFP Response File (OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CONTRACT