Cities Index.
Comment Letter

Santa Clarita City Council
May 13, 2025

Document
Comment Letter
Meeting
May 13, 2025
Body
Santa Clarita City Council
Original file
73 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santaclaritacityca.iqm2.com. That file is the official record.

Mindy Bish, Esq 22505 Market St Suite 104 Newhall, CA 91321 (213) 392 - 3385 [email protected] April 28, 2025 The City Council of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Blvd #120 Valencia, CA 91355 Honorable Members of the City Council of Santa Clarita: My name is Mindy Bish. I am the owner of the building on Market Street and Railroad Avenue

that

houses

both

my

law

firm

and

the

Rafter’s.

Firstly,

thank

you

all

for

doing

the

due

diligence

expected

of

you

by

the

good

people

of

Santa

Clarita.

As

a

resident

of

Santa

Clarita

since

1993,

I

appreciate

the

work

to

ensure

the

city

grows

responsibly

and

respectfully.

I

wanted

to

take

the

time

to

address

your

concerns

about

the

inclusion

of

the

building

in

the

work

being

proposed

by

Serrano

development:

the

historic

nature

of

the

building,

the

issue

of

parking,

and

the

relocation

of

the

Rafter’s

clubhouse.

I

thank

you

in

advance

for

your

time

reviewing

this

letter.

In regard to the historic nature of the building; unfortunately what remains is tenuous at best.

Nothing

exists

documenting

the

original

form

of

the

building

to

determine

if

the

building

in

its

current

form

is,

in

any

way,

the

same

as

it

was.

There

is

nothing

to

see

on

the

exterior

of

the

building.

The

building

attracts

no

visitors

based

on

its

alleged

historic

value.

No

one

showed

any

interest

in

the

building

as

a

historic

landmark

until

the

time

it

was

up

for

inclusion

by

Serrano

in

their

development

plans.

While

I

respect

people’s

desire

to

keep

important

landmarks

of

the

past,

especially

as

a

History

major

myself,

this

building

simply

is

not

the

landmark,

in

any

way,

it’s

being

ascribed

to

be.

Parking is a major issue in Downtown Newhall. No one refutes this as an issue. However, that problem

exists

whether

or

not

this

development

goes

forward.

Parking

is

a

problem

that

needs

to

be

resolved

regardless

of

this

development.

That

resolution

should

come

quickly

in

the

form

of

another

parking

structure.

Placing

the

burden

on

Serrano

to

build

much

needed

and

required

housing

and

fix

a

long-standing

problem

is

an

undue

burden

that

will

result

in

less

housing

not

more

parking.

I

would

ask

the

council

allow

the

parking

to

go

forward

as

specified

and

move

forward

with

a

new

parking

structure

to

fix

the

current

parking

problem

in

the

area.

The Rafters has found a new place for its clubhouse. While the Rafters does good work in the community

they

have

not

been

good

tenants.

They

did

not

respond

timely

to

requests

to

keep

common

areas

clean

or

to

ask

their

members

to

avoid

loitering

for

prolonged

periods.

As

such,

they

were

asked

to

find

a

new

place

regardless

of

the

building’s

inclusion

in

this

development.

Further, the Rafters stands to get an incredible amount of help for their move if the development proceeds.

In

that

situation

they’ll

be

able

to

remove

as

much

of

the

interior

of

their

clubhouse

as

they’d

like

and

get

$25,000

in

assistance

to

renovate

their

new

space

plus

they’ll

also

be

provided

with

discounted

contractor

work

from

Hahn

Contractors.

Rafters

stands

to

gain

if

the

development

is

allowed

to

proceed.

Lastly, while I have enjoyed my time in Santa Clarita, I have relocated to Florida for the past three

years

to

help

an

elderly

colleague

transition

to

retirement.

As

such,

I

will

be

moving

to

sell

the

building

regardless

of

the

outcome

of

the

development.

In

doing

so,

the

building

will

likely,

as

the

Mayor

indicated,

be

sold

to

someone

else

trying

to

develop

it.

Someone

who

might

not

have

the

same

kind

of

interest

as

Serrano

in

building

something

as

mutually

beneficial.

And

someone

who

may

adhere

to

the

letter

of

the

law

when

it

comes

to

what

is

required

of

them.

I

believe

it

will

result

in

the

best

possible

outcome

for

this

building

and

the

city

for

Serrano

to

take

ownership,

a

known

partner

to

the

city,

as

opposed

to

leaving

this

work

for

someone

else.

← All documents from this meeting