February 5, 2025
Tai Lane
Serrano Development Group
24 N. Marengo Avenue
Pasadena, CA 91101
LLG Reference No. 2.24.4807.1
Subject: Parking Demand Analysis for the
Downtown Newhall Mixed-Use Project
Santa Clarita, California
Dear Ms. Lane:
As requested, Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Parking Demand Analysis for the proposed mixed-used project development in the Downtown Newhall section of the City of Santa Clarita. The project is located on the north-east corner of Main Street and Market Street in Downtown Newhall, and is addressed at 24300, 24308 and 24316 Main Street and 24307 Railroad Avenue.
The Project proposes to demolish three existing retail buildings to construct a 78-unit multifamily development, inclusive of 5,223 square-feet (SF) of ground floor retail.
Parking will be provided via a gated basement level which would take access from Railroad Avenue and would consist of 67 spaces, inclusive of 26 tandem (second access) spaces. Additional at grade parking would be provided via gated access from Market Street consisting of 55 spaces, inclusive of 18 tandem (second access) spaces, for a combined parking total of 122 spaces.
Based on our understanding, a detailed parking assessment is needed to justify a reduced parking requirement for the site when compared to the City’s code parking requirements. As such, the following items have been considered.
Parking requirements documented in the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updated May 2022
Research of relevant parking reductions (i.e. Assembly Bill 2097, ITE, other comparable Cities, etc.)
Hourly off-site parking demand counts in the immediate area of the Project
Tai Lane
February 5, 2025
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Location and Description
The proposed Project is located on the north- east corner of Main Street and Market Street in Downtown Newhall, and is addressed at 24300, 24308 and 24316 Main Street and 24307 Railroad Avenue in the Downtown Newhall section of the City of Santa Clarita. Figure 1 , located at the rear of this letter report, presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the overall Project site in the context of the surrounding street system.
The proposed Project includes the development of a five -story building, with basement, consisting of 78 apartment units, above a two -level parking structure. The Project’s unit mix will consist of 39 one-bedroom units, 35 two-bedroom units, and 4 three-bedroom units, with 5,223 square-feet (SF) of ground floor retail space.
Parking will be provided via a gated basement level which would take access from Railroad Avenue and would consist of 67 spaces, inclusive of 26 tandem (second access) spaces. Additional at grade parking would be provided via gated access from Market Street consisting of 55 spaces, inclusive of 18 tandem (second access) spaces, for a combined parking total of 122 spaces. Table 1, attached to this letter, provides a summary of the Project development, inclusive of the Project’s proposed parking supply. Figure 2 presents the proposed Project site plan prepared by SAE Architecture Interiors . As shown on Figure 2 , with the closure of the existing driveway on Main Street, an additional 3 on-street parking spaces will be provided with the construction of the proposed Project.
PARKING ANALYSIS
Code Parking Requirements
The code parking calculation for the residential component of the Project is based on the City’s requirements as outlined in Chapter 17.42 – Residential Use Types of the City of Santa Clarita Municipal Code while the commercial component of the Project is based on the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updated May 2022. Based on the above the City’s Code specifies the following parking requirements:
Multifamily Residential: two (2) space per unit plus one-half (0.5) space per unit for guest parking
Retail: 1 space per first 1,500 SF, remaining square footage calculated at 1 space per 350 SF
Tai Lane
February 5, 2025
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc On that basis, Table 2 presents the code parking requirements for the proposed Project. Review of the upper portion of Table 2 presents the residential component which identifies a 195-space requirement. When compared to the proposed on- site parking supply of 122 spaces, a 73- space code-calculated shortfall is indicated . It should be noted that based on research of relevant parking reductions as well as actual demand studies for multifamily residential projects shows that the City code requirement is overstated. Later in the letter provides further justification and recommendations.
The lower portion of the Table 2 shows the commercial component which identifies that 12 spaces are required. The Old Town Newhall Specific Plan identifies a Parking In-Lieu Fee program for which the Project would be required to contribute to. The fee would be applied to the commercial parking component of the Project, as determined by the City. The fee shall be established by separate resolution of the City Council.
Funds collected by the City from fee payments may be used to finance the creation or expansion of public parking through the purchase of property and the construction of new facilities, including debt service and signage that identifies the location of parking within the business district. As such, the Project ’s retail parking requirements will be satisfied via its contribution towards this Parking In-Lieu Fee program.
Assembly Bill 2097
The City’s residential parking ratio of 2.0 spaces per unit is considered high when compared to ITE, other Cities and based on empirical data. As such, it is recommended that a reduced parking ratio be applied to the residential component of the P roject.
Further, given the location of the Project, which is across the street from the Metrolink Train Station, Assembly Bill 2097 (AB 2097), which states the following , would be applicable to the Project.
This bill would prohibit a public agency from imposing any minimum automobile parking requirement on any residential, commercial, or other development project, as defined, that is located within ½ mile of public transit, as defined.
Due to the project’s proximity to the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station, AB 2097 can be applied to the Project. However, per the City of Santa Claritia Director’s Policy:
Assembly Bill 2097 dated March 6, 2024, for AB 2097 to be applied to the Project it must demonstrate that the reduced parking requirement would not negatively impact existing residential or commercial parking within one-half mile of the project. As such, research of the following parking ratios was considered for the Project.
Tai Lane
February 5, 2025
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc TOD Multifamily Residential Parking Ratios
Research of multifamily residential code requirements has been conducted. Table 3 presents the parking requirements from ITE and other cities in the region. Review of the first column from Table 3 presents the residential parking requirements for Santa Clarita. The other columns presents the ITE parking requirements and other City parking requirements for Transit Oriented Developments (TOD’s).
Review of Table 3 shows that multiple sources have multifamily parking ratios well below the City of Santa Clarita code ratio. As such, it can be concluded that the City’s ratio is considered high and a reduced parking ratio would be appropriate. It should be noted that the City code parking requirement for resident guest of 0.5 spaces per unit is also considered high. As such, it is recommended that a ratio of 0.25 spaces per unit be applied to the resident guest component of the Project.
Empirical Parking Ratios For Multifamily Residential
Individual multifamily residential projects and local settings may have unique parking characteristics that may not be well represented in typical city code requirements.
There are increasing concerns among parking/traffic engineering and planning experts over City code parking ratios and parking minimums being outdated, causing multifamily developments to have either inadequate or excessive supply, and that the “one-size-fits-all” approach to estimating parking requirements inherent in city parking codes may not reflect actual, more current and realistic parking needs, operations, and management.
Notwithstanding the requirements of Santa Clarita’s City code, the actual parking requirements for multifamily residential uses have been found to be less than the City’s own Code requirement as illustrated by LLG’s previous field studies of actual parking demand at existing sites.
Table 4 presents a comparison of site development and parking ratios from the thirteen (13) apartment communities in southern California, inclusive of the source of parking survey data. Additional details for the comparable sites are also provided inclusive of the location, development summary, parking facility type, and parking supply. It should be noted that the ratios provided in Table 4 include demand related to resident and resident guest.
It should be noted that sites 12 and 13 in Table 4 were included per direction of the City to include additional comparable sites that are more aligned with the size of Project.
Tai Lane
February 5, 2025
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc Both Edgeway and Newhall Crossings provide subterranean gated parking for their residents. Appendix A presents the parking demand count sheets for these sites.
Review of the rightmost column of Table 4 presents the tenant and guest peak parking ratio (spaces per unit ) for each of the comparable sites. This array of peak parking rates yields an average ratio of 1.28 spaces per unit, an 85 th percentile ratio of 1.43
spaces per unit, and a 95 th percentile ratio of 1.46 spaces per unit. Direct comparison between the 95 th percentile ratio of 1.46 to what the Project is proposing, which is
1.56 spaces per unit shows the Project would exceed the 95 th percentile by 0.10 spaces per unit. It should be noted that the 95 th percentile ratio includes demand related to the resident guest component. Therefore, the projected surpluses in parking would be approximately 0.25 spaces per unit greater than what is identified. Given the above, LLG concludes that the parking ratios derived from the thirteen comparable sites are accurate representations for the unique parking characteristics of the proposed Project that are not reflected in the City code ratio and would be a good indicator of the parking demand of the proposed Project. It should also be noted that twelve (12) of the thirteen (13) sites observed were not directly across from a train station and as a result larger surpluses could occur. The thirteenth site observed is located approximately 650 feet north of the site along Main Street with in walking distance to the train station.
Closer inspection of the parking demand data shows that the resident component of that project is gated and does not allow for guest parking to occur within the gated areas. As such, the parking ratio for the residential component, excluding the resident guest component, of the Newhall Crossings apartment project is 1.07 spaces per units (gated demand 48 spaces divided by 4 5 occupied units = 1.07 spaces per unit). The ratio of
1.07 excludes any resident guest or commercial employee/guest since they park in the public parking structure. It should be noted that Newhall Crossing was approved at a ratio of 1.5 spaces per unit, but they provided 1.85 spaces per unit. The Newhall Crossings project is considered the most appropriate site for comparison since it has a similar number of units, is located in close proximity to the site, would likely have similar resident demographics and is located in walking distance to the Metrolink Station. As such, it can be concluded that the residential component of the Project is considered to have ample parking to support its needs.
Resident Guest Parking Requirements
As noted above, the project will not provide on-site parking to support the resident guest component of the project and will rely on public on-street parking within the vicinity of the project. The residential guest would require 20 spaces based on the assumption of
0.25 spaces per unit.
Tai Lane
February 5, 2025
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc To further assess the parking requirements of the Project and the potential for the Project to utilize “off -site” parking within public on- street parking areas, parking demand surveys were conducted hourly within the vicinity of the site from 9:00 AM through 9:00 PM by AimTD on Thursday and again on Saturday (April 25 and 27, 2024). All parked vehicles during each hourly survey round were counted and recorded. In addition, the parking counts were conducted on a weekend while shows were scheduled at the Canyon Theatre Guild which would be representative of an “active evening”. Figure 3 presents the key parking areas which would be available for use by the Project. Appendix B contains the weekday and weekend survey data.
Tables 5 and 6 present the weekday and weekend shared parking approach for the proposed Project and compares the forecasted hourly parking demand of the Project against the available parking surplus in off -site areas , respectively . Column (1) presents parking survey data collected along the on-street spaces within the vicinity of the site. Column (2) present s the ULI shared parking demand of the resident guest.
Column (3) presents the expected joint-use parking demand on an hourly basis, while Column ( 4) summarizes the hourly parking surplus/deficiency for the Project compared to the on -street parking supply of 135 based on the existing supply of 132 spaces plus 3 additional on-street spaces created by the project as a result of closing the driveway on Main Street. Appendix C presents the detailed shared parking table.
As indicated in Column (4) of Table 5, the weekday evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 112 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 23 spaces when compared to the proposed on-street parking supply of 135 spaces. As indicated in Column (4) of Table 6, the week end evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 131 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 4 spaces when compared to the proposed on-street parking supply of 135 spaces. As such, Tables 5 and 6 shows that based on the ULI shared parking profiles for the proposed Project, the parking demand for the resident guest can be accommodated by on- street parking within the area of the Project.
PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP)
To ensure adequate parking is provided for both tenants and guests of the Project, it is recommended that when the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company deems it necessary, the following key Parking Management Strategies be implemented by the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company:
The PMP should identify where location of short -term parking spaces for potential tenants and use by the leasing office.
Tai Lane
February 5, 2025
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc The PMP should restrict residents to parking in their assigned garage spaces. The PMP should provide rules of conduct for tenants and guest s to abide by.
Strict enforcement shall be adhered to.
PMP Measures
The following measures are available to the Project to mitigate any parking impacts or deficiencies in the event the proposed onsite parking supply is determined to be greater than what is provided.
Residential Component
1. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall assign one (1) parking space to every unit. Additional spaces may be assigned to any unit that requests additional assigned spaces dependent on the number of bedrooms provided within said unit. Residents may not park more than two (2) vehicles in the complex. The 2nd access/tandem spaces should be assigned to two- bedroom and three -bedroom units, however the Property Owner/Property Management Company has the flexibility to assign the 2 nd access/tandem spaces to one- bedroom units. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall determine the allocation of parking spaces for resident tenants, inclusive of spaces designated and signed for prospective resident tenants.
2. Residents will be provided a transponder or similar device (fob or key card, etc.) for remote access to the gated residential parking area within the Project’s apartment parking structure.
3. Every resident will be required to register their vehicle. The registered owner must be a lease holding resident. No permits will be issued to non- lease holders, or vehicles not registered to a lease holder. This registration will be updated annually at the time of recertification.
4. Vehicles lacking current registration will not be issued a permit. Vehicles that have lapsed registration will be towed by the Property Owner/Property Management Company. The storage of inoperable or unregistered vehicles is prohibited.
5. Vehicles may not occupy unassigned spaces for more than twenty-four (24) hours, without contacting the leasing office in advance. Violators are subject to towing at the vehicle owner’s expense.
Tai Lane
February 5, 2025
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc
6. If you obtain a new vehicle, you must provide new registration and will be given a new permit (transferring permits is not permissible).
7. Violation of the PMP strategies contained herein may result in the towing of the vehicle at the vehicle owner’s expense.
8. The enforcement of resident on-site parking requirements summarized herein will be handled by the Property Owner/Property Management Company to ensure compliance.
Through this monitoring and cooperation with the residents as a result of the annual review/monitoring, a partnership will be formed to ensure that residential tenants and retail employees and Management Company personnel on the property work together to ensure adequate parking is available.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on research of relevant parking reductions as well as actual demand studies for multifamily residential projects shows that the City code requirement is overstated.
Review of the data supports a reduced parking ratio. It can be concluded that the proposed residential ratio provided by the Project of 1.56 can adequately support the needs for the residential component. In addition, the commercial parking requirement of twelve (12) parking stalls will be waived via the parking in- lieu fee program identified in the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan.
Furthermore, the weekday evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 113 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 22 spaces when compared to the proposed on-street parking supply of 135 spaces. Additionally , the weekend evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 131 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 4 spaces when compared to the proposed on- street parking supply of 135 spaces. As such, the parking demand for the resident guest can be accommodated by on-street parking within the area of the Project.
To ensure adequate parking is provided, the Project has the ability to implement a PMP, inclusive of assignment of tandem stalls for specific units, to maintain adequate parking for all residents of the Project. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Project would adhere to the City of Santa Claritia Director’s Policy: Assembly Bill 2097 dated March 6, 2024 , and would not negatively impact existing residential or commercial parking within one-half mile of the project.
Tai Lane
February 5, 2025
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc * * * * * * * * * *
We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this analysis. Should you have any questions or need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to call us at (949) 825- 6175.
Very truly yours,
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
Richard E. Barretto, P.E.
Principal
cc: Shane S. Green, P.E., Senior Transportation Engineer
Attachments
TABLE 1
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY1
DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED-USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA
Land Use / Project Description Basement Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Total Project Development
Residential Component
1 Bedroom -- -- 9 units 10 units 10 units 10 units 39 units 2 Bedrooms -- -- 8 units 9 units 9 units 9 units 35 units 3 Bedrooms -- -- 1 unit 1 units 1 units 1 units 4 units Total Residential Units: -- -- 18 units 20 units 20 units 20 units 78 units Retail/Commercial Component
Retail Shop A -- 1,744 SF -- -- -- -- 1,744 SF
Retail Shop B -- 1,460 SF -- -- -- -- 1,460 SF
Retail Shop C -- 2,019 SF -- -- -- -- 2,019 SF
Total Retail/Commercial Space: -- 5,223 SF -- -- -- -- 5,223 SF Parking Structure Supply
1st Access Space 41 spaces 37 spaces -- -- -- -- 78 spaces 2nd Access (Tandem) Space 26 spaces 18 spaces -- -- -- -- 44 spaces Total Parking Supply 67 spaces 55 spaces -- -- -- -- 122 spaces
1 Source: SAE Architecture | Interiors, Site Plan dated November 4, 2024
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc TABLE 2
CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENT
DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED-USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA
Land Use / Project Description Size Parking Ratio2
Spaces
Required
Multifamily Apartments
One (1) Bedroom Units 39 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 78
Two (2) Bedroom Units 35 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 70
Three (3) Bedroom Units 4 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 8
Resident Guest 78 DU 0.5 spaces per unit 39
Total 78 units 195
A. Total Residential Parking Code Requirement: 195
B. Proposed Residential Parking Supply: 122
C. Residential Parking Surplus/Deficiency (+/-) [Row B – Row A]: -73 Retail Commercial
Retail 5,223 SF 1 space per first 1,500 SF, remaining square footage calculated at 1 space per 350 SF3 12
2 Source: City of Santa Clarita Municipal Code, Chapter 17.42 – Residential Use Types. 3 Source: Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updated May 2022.
TABLE 3
CITY CODE VS ITE AND DOWNTOWN/TOD PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIFAMILY IN MIXED-USE SETTING
DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED-USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA
Project Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio M ulti-Family Resid ential
Studio 1 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 0.5 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.25 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 2-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.75 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 3-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 2 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit Resident Guest Parking
Studio 0.5 sp/unit inc inc inc inc 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit inc 0.067 sp/ inc inc inc inc 1-Bedroom 0.5 sp/unit inc inc inc inc 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit inc 0.067 sp/ inc inc inc inc 2-Bedroom 0.5 sp/unit inc inc inc inc 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit inc 0.067 sp/ inc inc inc inc 3-Bedroom 0.5 sp/unit inc inc inc inc 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit inc 0.067 sp/ inc inc inc inc (Trad itional District)& Mixed U se) >10% low income) for TODs Code for TODs City of Sacramento
M unicip al Cod e (Av erage) (85th % ile) (Av erage) (85th % ile) Downtown Long Beach Blvd. City of San Diego Monica (for TODs Village Ctr & Gen Plan Redev elopment
AB 2345:amends CA
for TODs
TCRP Report 128 City of Los AngelesDowntown,
City of Santa
No Nearby Transit No Nearby Transit Near Transit Near Transit ITE Parking Generation (5th E d ) M ultifamily Housing (M id -Rise)City of Redlands City of Long Beach Density Bonus Law;City of Santa Clarita
TABLE 4
EMPIRICAL PARKING DEMAND RATIOS
DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED-USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA
Tenant & Tenant &
Peak Parking Saturday Peak
Ratio Ratio
Spaces per DU Spaces per DU
(Peak Hour) (Peak Hour)
1 580 Anton
Boulevard
Apartments [a]
Costa
Mesa
580 Anton
Blvd
250 Unit Apartments
• 5 Studio Units
• 168 1-Bedroom Units
• 77 2-Bedroom Units
Garage
440 Spaces
• Residents - 419 sp.
• Public/Guests - 21 sp.
Wednesday &
Saturday
6PM-3AM
1.28 (@ 2:00 AM)
1.24 (@ 3:00 AM)
2 Main Street
Village [b] Irvine 2555 Main
Street
481 Unit Apartments
• 265 1-Bedroom Units
• 200 2-Bedroom Units
• 16 3-Bedroom Units
Structure
1,020 Spaces
• Residents - 847 sp.
• Public/Guests - 173
sp.
Wednesday &
Thursday
10PM-12AM
1.42 (@ 12:00 AM) --
3 Paragon at Old
Town [b] Monrovia
700 S.
Myrtle
Avenue
163 Unit Apartments
• 82 1-Bedroom Units
• 81 3-Bedroom Units
Surface
Lot, On-
Street
Parking
404 Spaces
• Residents - 329 sp.
• Public/Guests - 75 sp.
Wednesday &
Thursday
6PM-12AM
1.48 (@ 11:00 PM) --
4 Trio
Apartments [b] Pasadena
44 N.
Madison
Avenue
304 Unit Apartments
• 46 Studio Units
• 141 1-Bedroom Units
• 117 2-Bedroom Units
Surface
Lot, On-
Street
Parking
480 Spaces
• Residents - 450 sp.
• Public/Guests - 30 sp.
Wednesday &
Thursday
10PM-12AM
1.22 (@12:00 AM) --
5 Adagio on the
Green [c]
Mission
Viejo
2660 Oso
Parkway 256 Unit Apartments
Garage,
Surface
Lot
512 Spaces
• Residents - 424 sp.
• Public/Guests - 88 sp.
Wednesday &
Thursday
7PM-2AM
Saturday: 12PM-3PM,
7PM-2AM
1.45 (@12:00 AM)
0.97 (@ 2:00 PM &
3:00 PM)
6 Apex Laguna
Niguel [c]
Laguna
Niguel
27960 Cabot
Road
284 Unit Apartments
• 32 Studio Units
• 161 1-Bedroom Units
• 91 2-Bedroom Units
Garage
539 Spaces
• Residents - 461 sp.
• Public/Guests - 78 sp.
Wednesday &
Thursday
7PM-2AM
Saturday: 12PM-3PM,
7PM-2AM
1.28 (@ 2:00 AM)
1.13 (@ 3:00 PM)
7 Nineteen01 [d] Santa Ana 1901 E First
St
254 Unit Apartments
• 123 1-Bedroom Units
• 125 2-Bedroom Units
• 6 3-Bedroom
Units
Gated
Residential
Structure
559 Spaces Thursday & Saturday
12AM-11:59PM
1.354
(@12:00 AM)
1.346
(@12:00 AM)
8 The Marke [d] Santa Ana
100 E
MacArthur
Blvd
300 Unit Apartments
• 155 1-Bedroom Units
• 131 2-Bedroom Units
• 14 3-Bedroom Units
Gated
Residential
Structure
660 Spaces
• Residents - 600 sp.
• Public/Guests - 60 sp.
Thursday & Saturday
12AM-11:59PM
0.767
(@12:00 AM)
0.643
(@ 2:00 PM &
3:00 PM)
9 Core
Apartments
[d][e]
Anaheim
1815
Westside
Drive
222 Unit Apartments
• 328 Bedrooms Structure 726 Spaces
Thursday, Friday &
Saturday
5PM-12AM
1.38 (@12:00 AM)
1.33 (@12:00 AM)
10 Baker Block [d] Costa
Mesa
125 Baker
Street
240 Unit Apartments
• 349 Bedrooms Structure 466 Spaces
Thursday, Friday &
Saturday
5PM-12AM
1.30 (@12:00 AM)
1.24 (@12:00 AM)
11 Rize [d] Irvine 1100
Synergy
363 Unit Apartments
• 511 Bedrooms Structure 564 Spaces Tuesday & Saturday
5PM-12AM
1.18 (Peak Hour N/A)
1.22 (Peak Hour N/A)
12 Edgeway [f] Bellflower 9735 Oak
Street
91 Unit Apartments
• 52 1-Bedroom Units
• 31 2-Bedroom Units
• 8 3-Bedroom Units
Structure
137 Spaces
• Residents - 129 sp.
• Guests - 8 sp.
Thursday
12AM
1.28 (@12:00 AM) --
13 Newhall
Crossings [g]
Santa
Clarita
22551 9th
Street
47 Unit Apartments
• 5 1-Bedroom Units
• 32 2-Bedroom Units
• 10 3-Bedroom Units
Structure 99 Spaces Thursday
12AM
1.27 (@12:00 AM) --
Average: 1.28 --
85th Percentile: 1.43 --
95th Percentile: 1.46 --
Notes:
[a] Source: Counts collected by Counts Unlimited on May 2023. [b] Source: Parking Demand Analysis for the Proposed Fifth Avenue/Huntington Drive Mixed-Use Project City of Monrovia, California, prepared by LLG, Oct. 2012 [c] Source: Counts collected by LLG on December 2016.
[d] Source: Revised Parking Study for Brea Plaza Shopping Center, prepared by LSA, January 2022. [e] At the time of the surveys, 222 of the 400 units were occupied. [f] At the time of the surveys, 89 of the 91 units were occupied. [g] At the time of the surveys, 45 of the 47 units were occupied.
Comparable Site City Address Development
Summary
Parking
Facility Parking Supply Survey Period
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc TABLE 5
WEEKDAY SURVEY PLUS SHARED PARKING [1]
DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED-USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA
Land Us e Resident Guest
Size 78 DU Total
Pkg Rate 0.25 /DU Spaces = Comparison w/
Gros s 20 S pc. 32 Park i ng S uppl y
Spaces Shared 135 Spaces [2]
Number of Number of Parking Surplus
Time of Day Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency)
9:00 AM 53 57 78
10:00 AM 58 62 73
11:00 AM 58 62 73
12:00 PM 68 72 63
1:00 PM 81 85 50
2:00 PM 69 73 62
3:00 PM 62 66 69
4:00 PM 68 72 63
5:00 PM 75 83 52
6:00 PM 85 96 39
7:00 PM 92 111 24
8:00 PM 94 113 22
9:00 PM 68 87 48
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.
Existing On-
Street Demand
4 4
4 4
4 4
8 11
19 19
19 [2] There is an ex isting on-street parking supply of 132 spaces. With the closure of the driveway along Main Street that will occur with the construction of the Project an additional 3 on-street parking spaces will be provided.
4 4
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc TABLE 6
WEEKEND SURVEY PLUS SHARED PARKING [1]
DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED-USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA
Land Us e Resident Guest
Size 78 DU Total
Pkg Rate 0.25 /DU Spaces = Comparison w/
Gros s 20 S pc. 32 Park i ng S uppl y
Spaces Shared 135 Spaces [2]
Number of Number of Parking Surplus
Time of Day Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency)
9:00 AM 77 81 54
10:00 AM 85 89 46
11:00 AM 86 90 45
12:00 PM 87 91 44
1:00 PM 91 95 40
2:00 PM 96 100 35
3:00 PM 95 99 36
4:00 PM 95 99 36
5:00 PM 99 107 28
6:00 PM 103 115 20
7:00 PM 104 124 11
8:00 PM 111 131 4
9:00 PM 95 115 20
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020. [2] There is an ex isting on-street parking supply of 132 spaces. With the closure of the driveway along Main Street that will occur with the construction of the Project an additional 3 on-street parking spaces will be provided.
Existing On-
Street Demand
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
20 20
20 8
12 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Appendix Cover.doc
APPENDIX A
EDGEWAY AND NEWHALL CROSSINGS PARKING
COUNTS
Bellflower
Edgeway Bellflower
9735 Oak Street, Bellflower, CA 90706
Friday, November 8th , 2024
Supply Demand
Regular 110 88
Handicap 3 2
Electric Vehicle 16 12
Subtotal 129 102
Total Occupancy 129 102
Total Percent 79%
Supply Demand
Handicap 1 1
Guest [a] 8
Leasing / Guest 3 3
Subtotal -- 12
Total Occupancy -- 12
Notes
[a] Parking supply consists of guest parking provided in alleyway to the west of the building and on-street parking to the north and south of the building.
Garage
Guests
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
951-268-6268
Santa Clarita
Newhall Crossings
22551 9th Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321
Friday, November 8th , 2024
Supply Demand
Regular 97 48
Handicap 2 0
Subtotal 99 48
Total Occupancy 99 48
Total Percent 48%
Supply Demand
Street Parking [a] 9
Subtotal -- 9
Total Occupancy -- 9
[a] Parking supply consists of spaces in the public portion of the parking structure and on-street parking along Main Street, 9th Street, and Railroad Avenue.
Garage
Guests
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
951-268-6268
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Appendix Cover.doc
APPENDIX B
EXISTING COUNTS
Thursday 4/25/2024
2A 2B 4 6A 6B 8 10A 10A 10B 7B 7B 3B 3B 1A 1B 3A 3A 3A 5A 5B 7A 7A 9A 9B Total Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Yellow Reg Reg Disabled Reg Disabled Reg Reg Reg Moto Disabled Reg Reg Reg Disabled Reg Reg 9:00 AM 7 4 4 3 4 0 0 1 0 5 0 9 0 1 2 9 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 53 10:00 AM 6 3 5 3 4 0 0 1 1 6 0 8 0 1 2 8 0 0 3 1 6 0 0 0 58 11:00 AM 7 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 4 2 1 7 1 1 3 9 0 0 5 2 4 0 0 2 58 12:00 PM 7 3 4 0 3 1 0 0 4 1 0 9 0 1 4 12 0 1 7 2 8 1 0 0 68 1:00 PM 6 3 4 1 4 0 2 0 5 9 0 8 0 1 4 12 0 0 6 2 12 1 0 1 81 2:00 PM 6 3 1 2 3 0 2 0 4 4 0 8 0 1 5 12 0 0 7 2 8 0 1 0 69 3:00 PM 4 3 2 2 2 0 1 0 2 4 0 9 0 1 4 12 0 1 6 2 5 0 1 1 62 4:00 PM 7 3 1 2 3 0 2 0 2 5 1 9 1 1 4 12 0 0 5 1 7 0 1 1 68 5:00 PM 6 3 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 7 1 8 1 1 3 12 0 1 6 3 12 0 3 2 75 6:00 PM 7 2 1 1 5 0 3 0 4 11 1 9 0 1 2 12 0 1 7 2 12 1 0 3 85 7:00 PM 6 4 1 2 5 0 3 0 6 10 1 10 0 1 3 12 0 1 6 2 12 1 1 5 92 8:00 PM 7 4 1 2 5 0 2 0 7 11 1 7 1 1 5 11 0 1 6 3 11 1 2 5 94 9:00 PM 7 4 0 1 3 0 2 0 2 8 0 6 0 1 5 8 0 0 5 3 10 1 0 2 68 Inventory 8 4 6 3 5 9 6 8 11 1 9 1 3 5 12 2 1 8 3 12 1 4 10 132 Available Parking1 0 1 0 0 8 3 -1 1 0 0 -1 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 38 Santa Clarita Parking Study
Prepared by AimTD LLC [email protected]
Saturday 4/27/2024
2A 2B 4 6A 6B 8 10A 10A 10B 7B 7B 3B 3B 1A 1B 3A 3A 3A 5A 5B 7A 7A 9A 9B Total Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Yellow Reg Reg Disabled Reg Disabled Reg Reg Reg Moto Disabled Reg Reg Reg Disabled Reg Reg 9:00 AM 7 3 3 3 5 2 2 1 2 11 0 9 0 2 2 12 0 1 4 2 6 0 0 0 77 10:00 AM 7 3 4 3 5 0 3 1 3 11 0 8 0 3 4 12 0 1 5 2 10 0 0 0 85 11:00 AM 7 4 4 3 5 0 3 0 4 11 1 9 1 2 4 12 0 1 4 2 9 0 0 0 86 12:00 PM 6 4 2 1 5 1 2 0 7 10 0 9 0 1 4 12 0 1 5 3 12 1 0 1 87 1:00 PM 5 3 1 2 5 0 4 0 7 11 0 9 0 1 3 12 0 1 5 2 12 1 2 5 91 2:00 PM 7 4 2 2 5 0 4 0 6 11 0 9 0 1 3 12 0 1 5 2 12 0 3 7 96 3:00 PM 8 4 1 1 5 0 4 0 7 11 0 8 0 1 4 12 0 1 6 2 12 0 1 7 95 4:00 PM 7 4 0 1 5 0 5 0 7 10 1 8 1 1 4 12 0 1 5 2 11 0 4 6 95 5:00 PM 7 3 1 3 5 1 4 0 7 11 1 8 1 1 4 12 0 1 6 2 12 0 3 6 99 6:00 PM 7 4 1 2 5 2 4 0 7 11 1 9 0 2 4 12 1 0 6 2 12 1 3 7 103 7:00 PM 6 3 0 0 5 5 5 0 7 11 1 9 0 2 4 12 0 1 6 2 12 1 4 8 104 8:00 PM 6 4 1 1 5 7 5 0 7 11 1 9 1 2 4 11 0 1 6 2 12 1 4 10 111 9:00 PM 6 4 0 1 5 5 4 0 7 9 0 8 0 1 4 10 0 0 6 2 11 1 3 8 95 Inventory 8 4 6 3 5 9 6 8 11 1 9 1 3 5 12 2 1 8 3 12 1 4 10 132 Available Parking0 0 2 0 0 2 1 -1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 21 Santa Clarita Parking Study
Prepared by AimTD LLC [email protected]
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Appendix Cover.doc
APPENDIX C
SHARED PARKING DEMAND
Land Use
Size 78 DU
Pkg Rate[2] 0.25 /DU
Mode Adjust
Non-Captive Ratio
Gross
Spaces
Time % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of # Of % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec of Day Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces 6:00 AM 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% 0 90% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 AM 10% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 100% 0 76% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8:00 AM 19% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 64% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 9:00 AM 19% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 52% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 10:00 AM 19% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 48% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 11:00 AM 19% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 43% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 12:00 PM 19% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 38% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1:00 PM 19% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 38% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2:00 PM 19% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 38% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3:00 PM 19% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 38% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4:00 PM 19% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 43% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5:00 PM 38% 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 100% 0 48% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6:00 PM 57% 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 100% 0 57% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 7:00 PM 95% 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 100% 0 67% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 8:00 PM 95% 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 100% 0 76% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 9:00 PM 95% 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 100% 0 81% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 10:00 PM 95% 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 100% 0 90% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 11:00 PM 76% 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 100% 0 92% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 12:00 AM 48% 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 100% 0 95% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020. [2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code. [3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.
Guest Spc. Resid. Spc. Total Spaces20 0 Reserv Spc. 0 20 Appendix C
RESIDENTIAL (Studio)
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
Reserved Parking DemandGuest Parking Demand Resident Parking Demand Residential (Studio)
Shared Parking Demand
Land Use
Size 78 DU
Pkg Rate[2] 0.25 /DU
Mode Adjust
Non-Captive Ratio
Gross
Spaces
Time % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of # Of % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec of Day Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces 6:00 AM 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% 0 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 AM 20% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 95% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8:00 AM 20% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 88% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 9:00 AM 20% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 80% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 10:00 AM 20% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 75% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 11:00 AM 20% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 70% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 12:00 PM 20% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 68% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1:00 PM 20% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 65% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2:00 PM 20% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 65% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3:00 PM 20% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 68% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4:00 PM 20% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 0 71% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5:00 PM 40% 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 100% 0 74% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6:00 PM 60% 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 100% 0 77% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 7:00 PM 100% 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 100% 0 80% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 8:00 PM 100% 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 100% 0 83% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 9:00 PM 100% 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 100% 0 86% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 10:00 PM 100% 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 100% 0 89% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 11:00 PM 80% 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 100% 0 92% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 12:00 AM 50% 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 100% 0 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.
Appendix C
Reserved Parking Demand
Residential (Studio)
Shared Parking DemandGuest Parking Demand Resident Parking Demand WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
RESIDENTIAL (Studio)
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
20 [2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code. [3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. 20 0 Reserv Spc. 0 Total SpacesResid. Spc.Guest Spc.