Cities Index.
2025-08-19 Planning Commission (available in the City Clerk's Reading File)

Santa Clarita City Council
November 25, 2025

Document
2025-08-19 Planning Commission (available in the City Clerk's Reading File)
Meeting
November 25, 2025
Body
Santa Clarita City Council
Pages
8
Original file
40.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santaclaritacityca.iqm2.com. That file is the official record.
Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 1

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

PLANNING COMMISSION

AGENDA REPORT

PUBLIC HEARINGS
PLANNING MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: August 19, 2025
SUBJECT: Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use Project (Master Case 20-238) APPLICANT: Wiley Canyon, LLC
LOCATION: West side of Wiley Canyon Road, between Calgrove Boulevard and Hawkbryn Avenue
CASE PLANNER: Erika Iverson

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Planning Commission:

1. Receive the staff presentation in response to Planning Commission direction;

2. Open the continued public hearing to receive testimony from the applicant and the public;

3. Provide direction to staff on the hearing schedule; and

4. Continue the public hearing to a date certain.

REQUEST
The applicant, Wiley Canyon, LLC, is requesting approval of an Architectural Design Review, Conditional Use Permit, Development Review, Minor Use Permit, Oak Tree Permit, and Tentative Map to allow for the development of a mixed-use project consisting of a senior-living facility with 130 independent-living units, 61 assisted-living units, and 26 memory-care beds; 8,914 square feet of commercial floor area; and 379 multi-family apartment units (Project).

BACKGROUND
To date, the City of Santa Clarita’s (City) Planning Commission has conducted two public hearings on the proposed Project. On March 19, 2024, the Project was introduced, and an overview of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) was provided. At that meeting City 1 Packet Pg. 11

Page 2 ends

staff received comments on the DEIR and direction from the Planning Commission to bring back information on various topics at the June 18, 2024, meeting. On June 18, 2024, during the last public hearing held for the Project, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing to a date uncertain, with direction for City staff and the applicant to bring back additional information on various topics before considering a recommendation on the Project. The intent of this meeting is to respond to the Planning Commission’s direction from the June 2024 public hearing, to receive direction from the Planning Commission on the public hearing schedule, and direct staff to prepare a recommendation and all associated documents for action on the Project.

City staff proposes the following dates for the Project hearing schedule:

March 19, 2024 Project introduction, summary of Draft Environmental Impact Report, and public comments

June 18, 2024 Applicant Response to Planning Commission and public comments

August 19, 2025 Response to Planning Commission and public comments

Tentatively
September 16, 2025 Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Project determination

JUNE 18, 2024, PLANNING COMMISSION FOLLOW-UP

At the June 2024 meeting, City staff provided an overview of the applicant responses to Planning Commission comments made at the March 2024 hearing. The Planning Commission requested clarification and additional information on a number of topics from City staff and the applicant as follows:

• Traffic Circulation on Wiley Canyon Road/Traffic Simulations • Timing of Roadway Improvements/Right-of-Way Acquisition • Emergency Plans for the Senior Living Facility
• Parking Operations Plan
• On-site Construction Phasing Plan/Noise Mitigation
• Additional Renderings
• Consider Community Outreach with Spanish Translation

Following the June 2024 meeting, the applicant submitted an Alternative Project for Planning Commission consideration. The Alternative conceptual plan is provided as an attachment and will be discussed in the applicant presentation at the August 19 public hearing. Additional discussion on the Alternative Project and topics above is provided as follows:

Alternative Concept Plan

In preparing an EIR, alternative projects are required to be analyzed to determine if a revision to the Project could result in an environmentally superior project that meets the Project objectives. The DEIR identified and analyzed four Alternative projects including: (1) No Project/No Build Alternative; (2) Affordable Housing Alternative; (3) Private Recreation 1 Packet Pg. 12

Page 3 ends

Facility Alternative; and (4) Construction Noise Setback Alternative. While, the Construction Noise Setback Alternative would reduce the number of overall units, it still includes a four- story apartment component, and it would eliminate the commercial component entirely.

The applicant provided an additional Alternative concept (Fifth Alternative) for consideration that would reduce the overall density and floor area of the Project as shown in the table below.

Specifically, it would eliminate the four-story, for-rent apartment component and replace it with two-story, detached single-family condominiums, and two-story townhomes. The Fifth Alternative would consist of 45 detached single-family units, eight of which would include an attached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU); and 179 townhome units. In total, 232 residential units would be provided. In addition, the Fifth Alternative would eliminate the independent senior living units. The senior living facility would be reduced to 120 rooms for assisted-living residents. The project would also retain a commercial component of approximately 9,000 square feet, an increase of approximately 86 square feet.

Original Project Fifth Alternative
Residential Units 379 232
Independent Senior Units 130 0
Assisted Living Units 87 120
Commercial 8,914 sq. ft. 9,000 sq. ft.

Under the Fifth Alternative, all site grading, bank stabilization, oak tree removals, site access, and off-site roadway and infrastructure improvements remain the same.

As it relates to development standards of the Mixed-Use Neighborhood (MXN) zone and development limitations established for the Calgrove Corridor/Smiser Ranch Special Development Area (Smiser Ranch Area) of the General Plan, the Fifth Alternative meets the objective development regulations. The General Plan establishes a limitation on the overall allowable floor area of 830,000 square feet of total residential and commercial combined development (excluding parking facilities) in the Smiser Ranch Area. The combined floor area of the Fifth Alternative is 523,890 square feet, a reduction from the 677,280 square feet proposed under the original project request, and still within the allowable floor area for the Smiser Ranch Area.

Height is limited to 50 feet in the MXN zone. Under the Fifth Alternative, the assisted-living facility would remain at a maximum height of four stories, not to exceed 50 feet. The single- family detached condominiums and townhomes would be reduced to two stories, with a maximum height of 35 feet.

Parking would exceed the City’s mixed-use development standards by 50 parking stalls as shown in the table below. Each single-family condominium and each townhome would provide a two-car garage. Each ADU would have one surface parking space. Guest parking would be accommodated along the private street. The parking for the commercial and senior-living facility would be provided in surface parking spaces around the building.

1 Packet Pg. 13

Page 4 ends

Land Use Parking Ratio Units Required
Spaces
Provided
Spaces
Single-Family Condominium 2/Unit 45 90 90
Townhome 2/Unit 179 358 358
ADU 0/Unit 8 0 8
Residential Guest 0.5/Unit 224 112 129
Senior Living Facility 0.5/Bed or Unit 120 60 66
Commercial 1/200 sq. ft. 9,000 sq. ft. 45 64
TOTAL 665 Spaces 715 Spaces

Traffic Circulation and Traffic Simulations

Roadway improvements associated with the Project include the installation of three new roundabout intersections: 1) at the Project entrance on Wiley Canyon Road; 2) at Canerwell Street and Wiley Canyon Road; and 3) at Calgrove Boulevard and Wiley Canyon Road. In addition, a Class I trail (two-lane bicycle path and separated, five-foot wide pedestrian path) would be installed along the Project frontage on Wiley Canyon Road from the Project entrance to Calgrove Boulevard.

As discussed at the March and June 2024 meetings, Wiley Canyon Road is designated by the General Plan as a Secondary Highway, which is a four-lane road configuration. Along the Project frontage, the proposed Project improvements would maintain a two-lane roadway configuration. The design is based on the traffic analysis for the Project, which considers the traffic volumes, inclusive of the current and expected future traffic volumes, plus the traffic volumes for the Project, along portions of Wiley Canyon Road and Calgrove Boulevard. As discussed in the traffic assessment, vehicle trips would be between 9,000 and 10,000 vehicle trips per day, well below the maximum capacity of a two-lane roadway, of 16,000 to 18,000 vehicle trips per day. The Project does not change the General Plan Roadway designation. As discussed at the June 2024 meeting, City Traffic and Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the existing right- of-way width of Wiley Canyon Road and determined that, Wiley Canyon Road could be designed with four vehicle lanes and a sidewalk on either side of the roadway in the future if that was ever necessary. Based on the traffic analysis for the Project, it is not expected that four lanes will be necessary.

In the case of the Fifth Alternative, the daily trips for the Project would be further reduced than what was analyzed in the traffic assessment for the Project. However, the proposed roadway improvements would remain the same if the Fifth Alternative were selected.

The site access has been reviewed by City Traffic and Transportation Planning staff, as well as the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD). The site provides one vehicular access from Wiley Canyon Road. A secondary access is required by LACFD only for emergency service.

This is a gated access from Wabuska Street and will have a Fire Department knox box. There is no pedestrian or non-emergency vehicle access provided at this gate.

At the August 19 meeting, the applicant will present traffic simulations to demonstrate traffic 1 Packet Pg. 14

Page 5 ends

circulation on Wiley Canyon Road. Simulations include traffic operations at each of the proposed roundabouts, as well as the intersections of Wiley Canyon Road and Lyons Avenue; Wiley Canyon Road and La Glorita Circle; Wiley Canyon Road and Wabuska Street; and the Calgrove Boulevard interchange with Interstate 5 (I-5).

Timing of Roadway Improvement/Right-of-Way Acquisition

Before grading permits are issued, the Conditions of Approval would require approval of a street improvement plan. As part of the plan check process for street improvements, applicants are required to submit construction phasing and traffic control/detour plans for the roadway improvements. Conditions of Approval will also dictate the timing of required roadway improvements. In the case of the proposed Project, roadway improvements along the Project frontage of Wiley Canyon Road, from the Project entrance to Calgrove Boulevard, would be required to be in place before any certificate of occupancy is issued for the Project.

Separately, the timing for the right-of-way acquisitions is also outlined by Conditions of Approval. In the case of the proposed Project, any property acquisition required for the proposed roadway improvements would be required before approval of the Final Map or before a grading permit is issued, whichever occurs first. City staff has received letters with conceptual approval from the two property owners impacted by the proposed roundabout at Calgrove Boulevard. The applicant worked with City staff on the design and alignment of the roundabout at Canerwell Street to eliminate the need for any property acquisition at that location. The applicant also redesigned the access to the proposed recreation area, eliminating the need for a reciprocal access agreement with the gym property. The round about at the Project entrance does not require private property acquisition.

Emergency Operation Plan

An operator for the assisted living facility has not been identified at this time, so emergency operations specific to the proposed assisted living facility have not yet been outlined. However, the operation of the assisted living facility is regulated by and requires a state license from the Department of Health and Human Services. Part of the licensing requires the development of an Emergency and Disaster Plan. The plan must be prepared in conformance with requirements under the state Health and Safety Code and the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Section 87212), Emergency Disaster Plan. Elements of the plan include staff assignments during an emergency, evacuation procedures (including transportation plans), as well as sheltering in place considerations and procedures. The plans also require annual staff training, as well as staff practice drills. If recommended for approval by the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission could direct staff to include a Condition of Approval to require a copy of the state approval before building occupancy to ensure this requirement has been met.

Parking Operations Plan

As described above, the provided parking under the Fifth Alternative exceeds the mixed-use development parking requirements. Specific to the parking operation of the assisted living facility and the commercial space, a total of 105 parking spaces are required, and 130 are provided. Parking spaces are permitted to be shared between the commercial and assisted living 1 Packet Pg. 15

Page 6 ends

facility. The applicant has not identified an operator for the commercial tenant space(s) or the assisted living facility at this time, but parking operations would be up to the property owner/manager to manage. As noted above, overall provided parking exceeds the development standards by 50 stalls.

On-site Construction Phasing Plan/Construction Noise

The applicant provided a construction phasing plan for the Fifth Alternative, which is provided as an attachment. As indicated, Phase I of the construction would consist of all the site grading and infrastructure. Phase II would consist of the off-site roadway improvements and the single- family detached condominiums and townhome units. Phase III would consist of the construction of the assisted living facility and commercial building. Construction staging and parking are accommodated onsite within the assisted living/commercial lot. Over the course of the construction of Phase III, the construction parking and staging will shift at various stages of construction, but space will be maintained onsite to accommodate the construction workers and equipment staging. This will also be dictated by Conditions of Approval for the Project, which would require that all construction-related parking and equipment be staged on the Project site.

Construction-related noise impacts were analyzed in the DEIR. The Project would generate temporary construction noise at levels that exceed exterior daytime noise standards. However, not all construction activities would exceed the daytime noise levels. The temporary impacts are associated with the larger earth moving equipment, and the noise level does reduce as those activities move further from adjacent sensitive receptors. Regarding the adjacent Mulberry Mobile Home Park, there is approximately 30 feet between the existing wall along the Mulberry Mobile Home Park and the property line for the proposed Project. This separation creates a 30- foot buffer between the mobile home residences and the proposed construction for the Project.

There is no grading or structures associated with the Project within those 30 feet. In addition, the DEIR incorporates mitigation measures to reduce the impacts of construction noise on adjacent sensitive uses. Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-1 requires the use of noise-reduced construction equipment within 200 feet of adjacent sensitive receptors. Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-2 requires stand-alone construction noise barriers, sufficient in height to block the line of sight between the construction area and adjacent sensitive receptors. Adherence to these mitigation measures ensure that the temporary construction noise impacts are reduced for the nearest sensitive receptors.

Renderings

The applicant has provided one new Project rendering, representative of the Fifth Alternative, to highlight an interior view of the Project, which shows the townhome product, adjacent to the proposed Metro Sound Wall that will be constructed between the I-5 and the Project site. An additional visual simulation was prepared to highlight an exterior view taken from Carland Drive, in the Oakridge Estates neighborhood, looking west toward the Project site. The rendering and visual simulation are provided as attachments.

Community Outreach

At the June 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission asked the applicant to consider additional 1 Packet Pg. 16

Page 7 ends

outreach to the community with Spanish interpretation available. In August 2024, the applicant held a community meeting at the Mulberry Mobile Home Park with a Spanish interpreter.

Separately, in advance of the August 19 hearing, the applicant has conducted additional outreach in the community to present the Fifth Alternative concept. This included outreach to individual community members as well as conducting an informational community meeting on May 19, 2025.

NEXT STEPS

The Project is a housing development project in accordance with the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (Government Code section 66300). Accordingly, the Project must be reviewed and evaluated based on conformance with the City’s objective development standards, and the decision-making body cannot conduct more than five public hearings (including appeals). This meeting is the third public hearing on the Project, and a final decision would be required at a subsequent meeting to allow for an appeal to the City Council, if any were filed. Additionally, as a housing project, the Project cannot be denied if it is in compliance with the City’s objective design standards.

City staff seeks direction from the Planning Commission on a recommendation for the Project and the hearing schedule. The Planning Commission could recommend the Project as originally submitted, or one of the DEIR alternatives, including the Fifth Alternative presented by the applicant. If the Planning Commission decides the Fifth Alternative is the preferred Project for consideration, City staff will work with the City’s environmental consultant to analyze the Fifth Alternative, just as the other alternatives were analyzed in the DEIR, and incorporate into the Final EIR. The Final EIR, with responses to all comments, and any further alternative analysis, would be presented to the Planning Commission for consideration at the next meeting.

Additionally, if one of the conceptual Alternative scenarios is selected as the preferred Project for consideration, the Conditions of Approval for the Project would require a Development Review and Architectural Design Review approval before building permits can be issued.

Based on Planning Commission direction at the August 19 meeting, City staff anticipates returning to the Planning Commission on September 16, 2025, with a recommendation on the Project and Final EIR with responses to all comments.

NOTICING

All notices required by law were completed, which consisted of a legal advertisement in The Signal newspaper on July 29, 2025, and notification of public hearing by mail to all property owners and occupants within a 1,000-foot radius of the Project site. Two signs were also posted at the Project site on August 5, 2025. Following the publication of the public hearing notice, and as of the writing of this staff report, City staff has received three comments from the community in opposition to the Project.

ATTACHMENTS
Fifth Alternative Site Plan
1 Packet Pg. 17

Page 8 ends

Fifth Alternative Sound Wall Rendering
Fifth Alternative Visual Simulation
Construction Phasing
Public Notice
Public Comments
1 Packet Pg. 18

1.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Fifth Alternative Site Plan (Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use (MC20-238)) /0/1/2/3/4/5/i255/7/0/8/3/9/10/i255/i255/11/i255/i255/12/0/13/i255/2/3/4/5/12/5/13/i255/i255/11/i255/i255/14/2/10/i255/2/1/5/2/i255/i255/11/i255/i255/13/2/7/1/2/15/5/3/9/0/16/i255/i255/18/19/18/20/i255/21/22/23/23/22/24/25/i255/26/27/28/25/24/23/26/24/23/29/26/i255/24/30/29/26/22/31/27/29/31/32/33/i255/22/34/29/35/i255/36/37/24/i255/21/26/24/35 /34/38/31/27/39/i255/30/27/34/36/27/30/22/34/40/i255/22/32/i255/24/34/i255/24/30/31/22/32/31/41/32/i255/29/38/34/29/27/42/31/22/38/34/35/i255/32/43/37/44/27/29/31/i255/31/38/i255/29/26/24/34/40/27/35/i255 /18/19/18/20/19/45/46/i255/47/i255/20/48/49/50/48/18/20 /51/52/53/54/55/i255/57/58/59/55/60/59
/61/58/59/62/58/i255/57/53/58/63/52/62/58/64/i255/57/58 /51/52/53/54/55/i255/57/58/59/55/60/59/i255/53/53/57
/65/66/67/67/68/69/70/i255/72/73/74/75/76/68/69/77/77/i255/67/78/79/80/81/80/82/i255/i255

1.b
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Fifth Alternative Sound Wall Rendering (Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use (MC20-238))

1.c
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Fifth Alternative Visual Simulation (Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use (MC20-238))

STOPSTOP
STOP

BUS BAY

BUS BAY

BUS BAY
BLDG. E
OPEN SPACELOT 7
DRAINAGE BASINOPEN SPACELOT 6
OPEN SPACELOT 8
SENIOR LIVING FACILITY/LOT 1COMMERCIAL
RESIDENTIALLOT 2
RESIDENTIALLOT 3
RESIDENTIALLOT 4
RESIDENTIALLOT 5
OPEN SPACELOT 9CITY DEDICATION

BUS BAY
STOP
STOP
STOP

1.d
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Construction Phasing (Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use (MC20-238))

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302
Santa Clarita, CA 91355

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

APPLICATION: Master Case 20-238; Tentative Tract Map 83295, Architectural Design Review 20 -023, Conditional Use Permit 20- 005, Development Review 20-017, Minor Use Permit 20- 013, Oak Tree Permit (Class 4), and Environmental Impact Report 20-002

PROJECT APPLICANT: Wiley Canyon, LLC

PROJECT LOCATION: East of Interstate 5 and west of Wiley Canyon Road, between Hawkbryn Avenue and Calgrove Boulevard. Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 2825-012- 007, 2825-007-010, 2825-012-011, 2825-012-901, and 2825-012-902

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting entitlements for the development of the Wiley Canyon Mixed -Use Project, consisting of an approximately 277,108- square-foot senior living facility with 130 -independent living units, 61 a ssisted living units, and 26 memory care beds; approximately 8,914 square feet of ground floor commercial space; and 379 multi-family units. Buildings on-site would range from one- to four-stories, maximum of 50 feet in height. The Project also proposes to improve approximately 50,660 square feet for publicly accessible recreation space . The development of the Project would require several off -site improvements, which include a new roundabout at the Project entrance on Wiley Canyon Road, and at the intersec tions at Wiley Canyon Road with Canerwell Street, and Wiley Canyon Road with Calgrove Boulevard. The Project would also construct Class I, II, and III bicycle lanes along Wiley Canyon Road from north of Lyons Avenue to Calgrove Boulevard, and along Calgrove Boulevard to The Old Road. In addition, off-site improvements are necessary for the buildout of the project, including a new water line proposed within Old Wiley Canyon Road, a new storage tank and a new pump within an existing pump station. The Project would require grading for up to 44,000 cubic yards of cut and 59,000 cubic yards of fill, and the import of approximately 85,000 cubic yards of fill.

The Project includes the removal of four non-heritage oak trees and the encroachment of 19 oak trees.

A public hearing on this item was previously conducted on March 19, 2024, where the Planning Commission continued the public hearing to the regularly scheduled meeting of June 18, 2024, to allow the applicant time to address outstanding items requested by the Planning Commission. At the meeting of June 18, 2024, the item was again continued to a date uncertain.

The City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission will conduct a continued public hearing on this matter on the following date:

DATE: Tuesday, August 19, 2025
TIME: At or after 6:00 p.m.

LOCATION: City Hall, Council Chambers
23920 Valencia Blvd., First Floor
Santa Clarita, CA 91355

The Planning Commission will re open the public hearing, receive testimony, and continue the public hearing to a future date. No formal action relative to this project will occur at this hearing.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) was prepared to identify the project's potential environmental . A Notice of Availability was posted and advertised to the public on March 1, 2024. The public DEIR for the Wiley Canyon project is available for review by appointment in the City Clerk’s Office at the following location:

City of Santa Clarita City Hall, City Clerk’s Office
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 120
Santa Clarita, CA 91355

1.e
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Public Notice (Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use (MC20-238))

The DEIR for the Wiley Canyon Project is also available for public review on the City of Santa Clarita website at: https://santaclarita.gov/planning/environmental-impact-reports-under-review/

If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearings described in this notice, or written correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clarita at, or prior to, the public hearings. If you wish to have written comments included in the materials the Planning Commission receives prior to the public hearing, it must be submitted to the Community Development Department by Friday, August 8, 2025.

For further information regarding this proposal, you may contact the project planner at the City of Santa Clarita, Permit Center, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 140, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Telephone: (661 ) 255- 4330. Website: www.santaclarita.gov/planning. Send written correspondence to: 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 302, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Project Planner: Erika Iverson, [email protected].

Patrick Leclair
Planning Manager

Published: The Signal, July 29, 2025

N
Project
i

1.e
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Public Notice (Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use (MC20-238)) From: Jason Crawford
To: Marie S
Cc: Erika Iverson; Patrick Leclair
Subject: Re: Planning Commission: Wiley Canyon Project Under Discussion on August 19, 2025 Date: Friday, August 8, 2025 1:16:55 PM
Hi
Thanks for your email. Wanted to acknowledge that it has been received, and I will make sure that it is included with the project packet when it goes back to planning commission for consideration.

Jason C
> On Aug 8, 2025, at 12:57 PM, Marie S <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments.
>
>
> Dear Mr. Crawford,
>
> I wish to press my concern that the City is again just playing manipulative games to push another development.

The Wiley Canyon Project has dragged along with obvious dissatisfaction from many community members, but the Developer and City keep proposing alternatives that come at everyone’s expense. The City needs to realize that several questionable events have occurred this year, likely headed by a city council member to the expense of the City’s overall reputation.
> My specific issues with this project:
>
> 1. Leave open land where it allows everyone to enjoy it, do not house every visible piece of land while picking up hiking trails and hard to build property sites. This is useful but not at the expense of loosing our rural feel. >
> 2. The transportation study not only was done as COVID-19 was waning, and people were starting to drive more normally, which is taken into account in the formula used for tales, but the study was conducted in July 2022, during school vacation, during a period traffic is always greatly reduced. The effect is numbers should be doubled and tripled. The figures for the assisted living facility are unusually high, as most traffic is staff on weekdays. >
> 3. Open up Calgrove to Valley. It is no longer, nor has it been for sometime, appropriate to allow for a private barricade on a public street. This project will force other communities to seek the same concessions which may have made sense at one time, but no longer due. The same is true of Placerita Canyon, these routes, which were public roads and were closed for vague political reasons need to be opened up to help traffic control. >
> 4. Smaller project is better in concept, but we do not need a project. This project is mirroring the questionable actions occurring at the Mall, where the City literally announced their plan as a concept, to avoid public opinion and distributing the plan to nearby residents. But the City is now assuming this is the approved direction, all determined with minimum public comment periods. Though, stakeholder meetings are often held, and referenced as occurring in City Council and City Planning meetings, The stakeholders are business entities, many who live outside of Santa Clarita. Stakeholder meetings, should contain a mix of business, education representatives, and homeowners who are not local business owners.
>
>
> Marie Scherb
> Resident since 1969
>

1.f
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Public Comments (Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use (MC20-238)) From: Annette Lucas
To: Erika Iverson
Subject: Final comments for 8/8/25 Wiley project
Date: Friday, August 8, 2025 4:43:52 PM
CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments.

The Village at Wiley Canyon proposed
project will impede the entire Santa Clarita
Valley.

Look carefully, the new proposal it may not
have lower density than the other
alternatives, it is still almost 6 homes per
acre.

Santa Clarita is a General Plan city and
needs to honor the current General Plan to
improve to Wiley Canyon Road to four
lanes between Wabuska and Calgrove. If
not, it may impede the cross valley
connector and the I-5 improvements to
the Calgrove on/ off ramps and make the
new improvements to the Calgrove on/off
ramps a mute improvement.

One City Traffic employee has said that
Wiley Canyon Road can comply to the

1.f
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Public Comments (Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use (MC20-238)) General Plan 4 lanes east of the creek.

To my knowledge no firm plans have
brought forward.

Can you imagine the future developments
and a 6-lane road funneling into a two-lane
road with 3 RoundAbouts within one mile?
The Village at Wiley proposed project
needs two access points not one
entrance/exit and an alley-way emergency
exit.

As planned, Mulberry Mobilehome
residents may lose parking and in turn use
the Kelton Estate neighborhood. The
Village at Wiley Canyon proposed
development only adds one extra parking
space within the development above the
city's requirement.

A fire station should be required in the
area since currently some neighborhoods
are out of the 8- minute response time and
especially since the County just approved

1.f
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Public Comments (Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use (MC20-238)) 510 units of homes across the I-5 freeway
near Calgrove Blvd.

There seems to be conflict of statements
in the way the “small land dedication” is
listed and mapped as a park”. This
dedicated area is almost behind the Santa
Clarita Athletic Club.

Who will the small park land be under and
what contract and have the accountability?
Will it be a vacant lot eventually be sold for
a home like they did in the Brittany Lane
neighborhood?
What about the new residents’ children
that need to be educated? Will the children
go to other schools or go to the already
overcrowded classrooms at Wiley Canyon
Elementary and other prospective Junior
and Senior high schools?
Our neighborhoods are requesting that
you look at the big picture of Santa Clarita
and the laws that govern it regarding

1.f
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Public Comments (Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use (MC20-238)) development.

Regards,
Annette Lucas
24618 Fourl Road
Newhall, CA
661-904-5208

Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

1.f
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Public Comments (Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use (MC20-238))

1.f
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Public Comments (Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use (MC20-238))

1.f
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Public Comments (Wiley Canyon Mixed-Use (MC20-238))

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 2

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

PLANNING COMMISSION

AGENDA REPORT

PUBLIC HEARINGS

PLANNING MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: August 19, 2025
SUBJECT: RUETHER SELF-STORAGE FACILITY (MASTER CASE 25-048) APPLICANT: LaTerra SS Investors III, LLC (c/o Allen Park and Bryan Miranda) LOCATION: 26477 Ruether Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 2836-017-030) CASE PLANNER: Marlene Mancia

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Planning Commission:

1. Receive staff’s presentation;

2. Open the public hearing to receive testimonial and written evidence;

3. After closing the public hearing, determine that Master Case 25-048 is categorically exempt from additional environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption;

4. Adopt Resolution No. P25-08, approving Master Case 25-048, including Conditional Use Permit 25-004 and Development Review 25-006, to allow the conversion of an existing one-story industrial building into a three-story self-storage facility and to permit its operation, all within an existing shell building located at 26477 Ruether Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 2836-017-030), subject to Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A); and

5. Take other action as determined by the Planning Commission.

REQUEST

The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Development Review (DR) to permit the conversion of an existing one-story industrial building into a three- story self-storage facility. The proposed self-storage facility would be located at 26477 Ruether Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 2836-017-030) within the Business Park (BP) zone and within the Homeless Shelter and Job Creation Overlay Zones in the community of Canyon 2 Packet Pg. 32

Page 2 ends

Country.

BACKGROUND

The project site was originally developed in the 1960s with an 18,720-square-foot industrial building. In 2013, approval was granted to demolish that structure and construct the existing approximately 39,840-square-foot industrial building for warehouse, manufacturing, and office uses (Master Case 12-144). On March 28, 2025, the City received an application for a CUP and DR to allow for the conversion of the current industrial building into a self-storage facility. The application was deemed complete on April 22, 2025.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Setting

The project site is a 2.002-acre lot, situated along Ruether Avenue and east of Centre Pointe commercial shopping center, within the Business Park (BP) zone and the Homeless Shelter and Job Creation Overlay Zone in the community of Canyon Country. Structures on surrounding properties were constructed between the 1970s and early 2000s. Surrounding parcels are zoned BP and include a mix of professional offices, supportive commercial uses, laboratories, manufacturing, warehousing, storage, auto repair, recreational facilities, and utility. An aerial map of the property and a site plan are attached for reference.

Project

The proposed Project would convert the currently existing approximately 39,840 square-foot industrial building into a 124,515 square-foot three-story self-storage facility within the existing shell building. The Project will not alter the existing building height of 38 feet. The Project also includes storage units across all levels; new vehicle loading and unloading spaces; a management office on the ground floor; replacement and relocation of the existing access gate; a new six-foot- tall perimeter wall; and refreshing the exterior paint and landscaping. Additionally, approximately 1,794 square feet of the existing loading dock area would be enclosed for additional square footage to accommodate a new lobby, two restrooms, and two elevators. The existing access gate would be relocated further back into the property, and would provide access to existing customers by private key/code.

Proposed operating hours are 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays. The facility will have at least one and no more than two employees on-site during business hours. After-hours security monitoring will be provided via surveillance cameras operated by a third-party security company. All associated activities would occur entirely within the building or be screened from public view.

GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING SETTING

Project Site & Zoning

The City’s General Plan and zoning designation for the subject property is BP. The BP land use 2 Packet Pg. 33

Page 3 ends

designation and zone provides for mixed-employment districts in areas accessible to transportation and visible from freeways and major arterials, and is intended to promote the development of master-planned environments with a high quality of design and construction.

Allowable uses in this designation include a variety of businesses such as self-storage facilities, offices, medical offices, research and development, laboratories, light assembly and fabrication, warehousing and distribution, supportive commercial uses, etc. Operation and storage activities in this zone are to be confined to enclosed buildings or otherwise screened from public view.

Self-storage facilities and self-storage facilities that exceed two stories or 35 feet in height are permitted in the BP zone with the approval of a CUP.

Surrounding Uses

Surrounding zones and land uses adjacent to the project site include: business park with the Saugus School District bus yard to the north; business park with auto repair uses to the east; business park with a laboratory use to the south; and business park with utility towers to the west.

Table 1
General Plan Zoning Land Use
Project
Site
BP BP Existing industrial building to remain (Proposed
Self-Storage Facility)
North BP BP Saugus School District bus yard
East BP BP Auto repair uses (Multitenant)
South BP BP Laboratory use
West BP BP Vacant lot with utility towers

ANALYSIS

General Plan Consistency

The Project was analyzed for compliance with the General Plan. The following portions of the General Plan are relevant to the Project:

Objective LU 1.1: Maintain an urban form for the Santa Clarita Valley that preserves an open space greenbelt around the developed portions of the Valley, protects significant resources from development, and directs growth to urbanized areas served with infrastructure.

Policy LU 1.1.5: Increase infill development and re-use of underutilized sites within and adjacent to developed urban areas to achieve maximum benefit from existing infrastructure and minimize loss of open space, through re- designation of vacant sites for higher density and mixed use, where appropriate.

Goal LU 2: A mix of land uses to accommodate growth, supported by adequate resources and maintaining community assets.
2 Packet Pg. 34

Page 4 ends

Objective LU 2.1: Provide adequate, suitable sites for housing, employment, business, shopping, public facilities, public utility facilities, and community services to meet current needs and the anticipated needs of future growth.

Policy LU 2.1.3: Provide a range of land use types and densities to reflect the special characteristics, lifestyles, and opportunities that differentiate various communities and villages in the Santa Clarita Valley, including urban, suburban, and rural living environments.

Goal LU 4: A diverse and healthy economy.

Objective LU 4.3: Enhance older commercial and industrial areas.

Objective LU 4.1: Promote creation of strong regional and local economies.

Policy LU 4.1.2: Promote creation of village commercial centers throughout the Santa Clarita Valley to meet the local and convenience needs of residents.

Policy LU 4.1.4: Promote economic opportunity for all segments of the community, including small businesses and new businesses.

Policy LU 4.3.4: Promote business development that upgrades and revitalizes older commercial corridors, including Lyons Avenue, Railroad Avenue/Newhall Avenue, Main Street and Soledad Canyon Road, in a manner that reflects each area’s character, architecture, and history.

Goal 2.5: Encourage the development of business park areas for future industrial/manufacturing land uses, with landscaping, employee recreation, pedestrian walkways, and other unified design standards.

The Project will revitalize an existing site and would promote economic opportunity in the area by providing an opportunity for a new business that would serve the local need for self-storage facilities within the City. Self-storage is a supportive commercial use that augments existing industries and residential growth with off-site storage options. The project site is zoned BP and is appropriately zoned for the proposed use. As the Project includes the repurposing of an existing building, it meets the goals of maintaining existing natural landforms, as it will not include any new construction on untouched or natural land. For these reasons, the Project meets the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan.

Municipal Code Consistency

The Project was also analyzed for compliance with the Santa Clarita Municipal Code. Within the BP zone, a self-storage use is permitted with the approval of a CUP. A CUP would also be required for a self-storage facility in excess of two stories or 35 feet in height. Additionally, a DR is required for the additional square footage and changes to the current site.

2 Packet Pg. 35

Page 5 ends

A CUP and DR require a comprehensive analysis to ensure compliance with all SCMC Chapter

17.53 Property Development Standards-Commercial and Industrial requirements. The proposed development complies with all parking standards, landscaping standards, and specific development standards for self-storage facilities.

The building was originally designed and developed in a manner compatible with and complementary to the existing development in the vicinity. The parking requirement for the original approval was more intensive than that required for the proposed new use; therefore, the existing parking was deemed to be sufficient with a surplus of 61 parking spaces. Landscaping was integrated into the original development to help complement the building. As part of the Project, the applicant is required to restore all landscaping as originally approved. Maintenance of the irrigation and landscaping will be conditioned to be maintained in perpetuity by the property owner.

As required by the SCMC, the Project complies with all specific development standards for self- storage facilities outlined in SCMC Section 17.66.110, including a CUP for facilities in excess of two stories or 35 feet in height and screening requirements. SCMC Section 17.66.110 requires self-storage facilities to be entirely enclosed and obscured from public view. Therefore, the Project includes a new six-foot-tall tube steel picket fence with a screen to obscure the facility and all associated activities from public view. As required by the specific development standards, the applicant has provided photo simulations of the proposed facility, which are attached for reference.

With the approval of a CUP for the self-storage facility use and an increased number of stories and a DR for additional square footage, the Project is consistent with the SCMC, subject to the attached conditions of approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS

The Project is categorically exempt from additional environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption for existing facilities. A Class 1 exemption includes the minor alteration of existing public or private structures and facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The Project consists of the revitalization of an underused site with additional square footage under the threshold identified in the CEQA Guidelines. The Project qualifies for this exemption, and a Notice of Exemption has been prepared for the proposed Project (attached).

NOTICING

As required by the SCMC, all property owners and residents within a 1,000-foot radius of the subject property were notified of the public hearing by mail. A public notice was placed in The Signal newspaper on July 29, 2025. A sign was posted at the site on July 30, 2025. To date, the Community Development Department has received no correspondence or concerns from the public regarding the Project.

CONCLUSION
2 Packet Pg. 36

Page 6 ends

The proposed self-storage facility is compatible with the types of uses envisioned for the BP zone and General Plan designation, and meets the requirements of the SCMC for commercial and self-storage facility development. Therefore, staff has drafted the necessary findings for approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Development Review, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A).

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution P25-08
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
Aerial and Zoning Map
Site Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevations
Photo Simulation
Public Noticing
Notice of Exemption
2 Packet Pg. 37
RESOLUTION P25-08

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MASTER CASE 25-048, CONSISTING OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 25-004 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 25-006 FOR A NEW

SELF-STORAGE FACILITY AFTER FINDING THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AS A CLASS 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 26477 RUETHER AVENUE (ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER: 2836-017-030) IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (EXHIBIT A).

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT. The Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact:

A. An application for Master Case 25-048 (Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 25-004 and Development Review (DR) 25-006) was filed by LaTerra SS Investors III, LLC (hereinafter “Applicant”) with the City of Santa Clarita (City) on March 28, 2025 . The property for which this application was filed is located at 26477 Ruether Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 2836-017-030) (hereinafter “Subject Site”);

B. The application was deemed complete on April 22, 2025;

C. The Applicant proposes to convert the currently existing approximately 39,840 square-foot industrial building into a 124,515 square foot three -story self-storage facility within the existing shell building. The Project also includes storage units across all levels; new vehicle loading and unloading spaces; a management office on the ground floor; replacement and relocation of the existing access gate; a new six -foot-tall perimeter fence; and refreshing the exterior paint and landscaping. Additionally, approximately 1,794 square feet of the existing loading dock area would be enclosed for additional square footage to accommodate a new lobby, two restrooms, and two elevators (the “Project”);

D. The zoning and General Plan designation for the subject site is Business Park (BP);

E. The subject site is within the Homeless Shelter and Job Creation Overlay Zone;

F. Surrounding zones and land uses adjacent to the subject site include: business park with the Saugus School District bus yard to the north; business park with auto repair uses to the east; business park with a laboratory use to the south; and business park with utility towers to the west;

G. On August 19, 2025, a duly noticed public hearing regarding the Project was held before the City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita; and

2.a
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Resolution P25-08 (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) Resolution P25-08
Master Case 25-048
August 19, 2025

Page 2 of 7 ends

H. At this public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the staff report, staff presentation, applicant’s presentation, and public testimony.

SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS. Based upon the foregoing facts and findings, the Planning Commission finds as follows:

A. The Project is categorically exempt from additional environmental review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption for existing facilities. A Class 1 includes the minor alteration of existing public or private structures and facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The Project consists of the revitalization of an underused site with additional square footage under the threshold identified in the CEQA guidelines. The proposed self -storage use is consistent with the applicable General Plan and zoning regulations;

B. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the Planning Commission is based on, is the Master Case 24-063 project file. This project file is located within the Community Development Department and is in the custody of the Director of Community Development; and

C. Based upon the findings set forth above, the Planning Commission finds that the Notice of Exemption for this project was prepared in compliance with CEQA.

SECTION 3. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE 25-048. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 25-048, the Planning Commission determines as follows:

A. That the proposal is consistent with the General Plan;

The proposal is consistent with the General Plan and its BP land use designation . The Project, consisting of the conversion of an existing industrial building to a self -storage facility within a n existing, developed business park, is consistent with the following General Plan goal, objective, and policies:

Objective LU 1.1: Maintain an urban form for the Santa Clarita Valley that preserves an open space greenbelt around the developed portions of the Valley, protects significant resources from development, and directs growth to urbanized areas served with infrastructure.

Policy LU 1.1.5: Increase infill development and re -use of underutilized sites within and adjacent to developed urban areas to achi eve maximum benefit from existing infrastructure and minimize loss of open space, through re-designation of vacant sites for higher density and mixed use, where appropriate.

2.a
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Resolution P25-08 (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) Resolution P25-08
Master Case 25-048
August 19, 2025

Page 3 of 7 ends

Goal LU 2: A mix of land uses to accommodate growth, supported by adequate resources and maintaining community assets.

Objective LU 2.1: Provide adequate, suitable sites for housing, employment, business, shopping, public facilities, public utility facilities, and community services to meet current needs and the anticipated needs of future growth.

Policy LU 2.1.3: Provide a range of land use types and densities to reflect the special characteristics, lifestyles, and opportunities that differentiate various communities and villages in the Santa Clarita Valley, including urban, suburban, and rural living environments.

Goal LU 4: A diverse and healthy economy.

Objective LU 4.3: Enhance older commercial and industrial areas.

Objective LU 4.1: Promote creation of strong regional and local economies.

Policy LU 4.1.2: Promote creation of village commercial centers throughout the Santa Clarita Valley to meet the local and convenience needs of residents.

Policy LU 4.1.4: Promote economic opportunity for all segments of the community, including small businesses and new businesses.

Policy LU 4.3.4: Promote business development that upgrades and revitalizes older commercial corridors, including Lyons Avenue, Railroad
Avenue/Newhall Avenue, Main Street and Soledad Canyon Road, in a manner that reflects each area’s character, architecture, and history.

Goal 2.5: Encourage the development of business park areas for future industrial/manufacturing land uses, with landscaping, employee recreation, pedestrian walkways, and other unified design standards.

The proposed Project will revit alize an existing site and would promote economic opportunity in the area by providing an opportunity for a new business that would serve the local need for self -storage facilities within the City. Self -storage is a supportive commercial use that augments existing industries and residential growth with off -site storage options. The subject site is zoned BP and is appropriately zoned for the proposed use. Surrounding businesses include a mix of professional offices, supportive commercial uses, laboratories, manufacturing, warehousing, storage, auto repair, recreational facilities, and utilities. The proposed Project would not interfere with adjacent uses and is appropriately zoned for self-storage, with approval of a CUP as conditioned.

2.a
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Resolution P25-08 (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) Resolution P25-08
Master Case 25-048
August 19, 2025

Page 4 of 7 ends

B. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of the SCMC;

The Project is contemplated within the BP zone , and with the conditions of approval associated with the CUP, the Project complies with all applicable sections of the SCMC.

Additionally, self -storage facilities , in excess of two stories or 35 feet in height , are permitted in the BP zone with the approval of a CUP. The Project was analyzed for compliance with the SCMC, and the Planning Commission determined that the Project complies with all SCMC Chapter 17.53 Property Development Standards-Commercial and Industrial requirements. The proposed development complies with all parking standards, landscaping standards, and specific development standards for self -storage facilities. The building was originally designed an d developed in a manner compatible with and complementary to the existing development in the vicinity. The parking requirement for the original approval was more intensive than that required for the proposed new use; therefore, the existing parking is found to be sufficient with a surplus of 61 parking spaces.

SCMC Section 17.66.110 requires self -storage facilities to be entirely enclosed and obscured from public view . Therefore, the Project includes a new six -foot-tall tube steel picket fence with a screen to obscure the facility and all associated activities from public view. Approval of the subject CUP , along with the conditions of approval, ensures compatibility of the proposed use with the surrounding developments and uses , in accordance with the applicable sections of the SCMC.

C. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and

The Project will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrime ntal or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity in which the property is located. The Project proposes to retain the existing industrial building on -site, originally designed to be compatible with surrounding land uses, and repurpose it as a self- storage facility. The proposed use and existing building are consistent with the types of uses and buildings envisioned by the General Plan and SCMC for the BP zone.

The Project is not anticipated to create any impacts to surrounding properties. The proposal was fully evaluated by regulatory agencies through the Development Review Committee process to ensure compliance with all applicable codes and regulations. The proposal was also subject to a public hearing process in which interested citizens in the vicinity were allowed to provide testimony before the Planning Commission. Through the application of conditions of approval, the Project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare and will not be materially injurious to the properties in the vicinity.

D. The proposal is physically suitable for the site. The factors related to the proposal’s physical suitability for the site shall include, but are not limited to, the following:

2.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Resolution P25-08 (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) Resolution P25-08
Master Case 25-048
August 19, 2025

Page 5 of 7 ends

1) The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for the proposed use;

The subject site is suitable for the proposal with respect to design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics. The existing building is within a developed business park area, in proximity to other similar industrial buildings. The Project would comply with the floor area ratio (FAR), setbacks, scale, bulk, coverage, and density required by the SCMC, and would further the development of the high -quality business park s envisioned by the General Plan and SCMC.

2) The highways or streets that provide access to the site are of sufficient width and are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such proposal would generate;

Ruether Avenue, which provides access to the subject site , is improved to a width of 65 feet. It includes a parking lane and two lanes for each of the north/south directions.

Ruether Avenue provides access to major thoroughfares, Golden Valley Road via Centre Point Parkway and Golden Triangle Road, and Soledad Canyon Road. As self- storage is a service where users access their storage units by moving items in and then visit the storage units infrequently, which does not generate daily traffic like a commercial office or industrial use. The access provided for the Project is sufficient to accommodate the traffic generated by the Project, which will be minimal. Therefore, the Planning Commission finds that the use would be suitable for the site and would have a similar or less impact than other possible uses for the subject site.

3) Public protection services (e.g., Fire protection, Sheriff protection, etc.) are readily available; and

The proposal is suitable for th e subject site with respect to public protection services.

The subject site is situated in an area that is predominantly developed with other business parks and industrial -like buildings , which are already receiving public protection services . The Project will convert an existing building, which is already adequately served by Fire, Police, and other public services ; therefore, i t will not include an increase in demand for such services. Additionally, the Project will provide on-site security monitoring by way of camera surveillance and support by a third-party security company. Therefore, the Project would not interfere with established public service operations.

4) The provision of utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.) is adequate to serve the site.

As the Project will convert an existing building already adequately served by water, sewer, power, and telecom utilities, it will not include an increase in demand for such

2.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Resolution P25-08 (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) Resolution P25-08
Master Case 25-048
August 19, 2025

Page 6 of 7 ends

services. Therefore, the Project would not interfere with established utility services.

SECTION 5. APPROVALS. The Planning Commission takes the following actions:

Adopt Resolution P 25-08, approving Master Case 25-048, includi ng Conditional Use Permit 25-004 and Development Review 25-006 to allow the conversion of an existing one-story industrial building into a three -story self -storage facility and to permit its operation, all within an existing shell building , after finding the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption, for a property located at 26477 Ruether Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 2836 -017- 030), subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A).

SECTION 6. RELIANCE ON RECORD.

Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the Planning Commission in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.

SECTION 7. SUMMARIES OF INFORMATION.

All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.

SECTION 8. NOTICE.

The Secretary is directed to provide a copy of this Resolution to the Planning Commission and any other person requesting a copy.

SECTION 9. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Resolution becomes effective immediately upon adoption and memorializes the Planning Commission’s final decision made on August 19, 2025.

2.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Resolution P25-08 (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) Resolution P25-08
Master Case 25-048
August 19, 2025

Page 7 of 7 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of August, 2025.

LISA EICHMAN, CHAIRPERSON

PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:

RACHEL CLARK, SECRETARY

PLANNING COMMISSION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )

I, Rachel Clark, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19th day of August, 2025, by the following vote of the Planning Commission:

AYES: COMMISSIONERS:

NOES: COMMISSIONERS:

ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:

PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY

2.a
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Resolution P25-08 (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048))

EXHIBIT A

MASTER CASE 25-048
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 25-004
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 25-006

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

In addition to all applicable provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC), the permittee agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of Santa Clarita’s (City) approval of Master Case 25-048.

GENERAL CONDITIONS
GC1. The project approvals expire if the use is not commenced within two years from the date of this Resolution, unless it is extended in accordance with the SCMC.

GC2. To the extent the use approved with this project is a different use than previously approved for the property, the prior approval is terminated along with any associated vested rights to such use, unless such prior approved use is still in operation, or is still within the initial pre-commencement approval period. Once commenced any discontinuation of the use approved with this project for a continuous period of two years or more terminates the approval of this use along with any associated vested rights to such use. The use may not be re-established or resumed after the two-year period.

Discontinuation includes cessation of a use regardless of intent to resume.

GC3. The permittee may file for an extension of the conditionally-approved project before the date of expiration. If such an extension is requested, it must be filed not later than 60 days before the date of expiration.

GC4. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, the term “permittee” includes the permittee and any other persons, corporation, or other entity making use of this grant. The permittee must defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Santa Clarita, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this project by the City, including any related environmental approvals. In the event the City becomes aware of any such claim, action, or proceeding, the City will promptly notify the permittee. If the City fails to notify the permittee or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee is not thereafter responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. Nothing contained in this condition prohibits the City from participating in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, if both of the following occur: 1) the City bears its own attorneys’ fees and costs; and 2) the City defends the action in good faith. The permittee is not required to pay or perform any settlement unless the settlement is approved by the permittee.

GC5. The permittee and property owner must comply with all inspections requirements as deemed necessary by the Director of Community Development.

GC6. The project site must be developed and/or used in the manner requested and must be in substantial conformity with the submitted plans date-stamped consistent with this approval, unless revisions and/or additional conditions are specifically required herein.

2.b
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) Resolution P25-08
Master Case 25-048
Conditions of Approval

Page 2 of 5 ends

GC7. This approval runs with the land. All rights and obligations of this approval, including the responsibility to comply with the Conditions of Approval, are binding upon permittee’s successors in interest. The Conditions of Approval may be modified, terminated, or abandoned in accordance with applicable law including, without limitation, the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC).

GC8. Any proposed deviations from the Exhibits, Project Description, or Conditions of Approval must be submitted to the Director for review and approval. Any unapproved deviations from the project approval will constitute a violation of the permit approval.

GC9. When exhibits and/or written Conditions of Approval are in conflict, the written Conditions of Approval prevail.

GC10. The effectiveness of this project will be suspended for the time period that any Condition of Approval is appealed whether administratively or as part of a legal action filed in a court of competent jurisdiction. If any Condition of Approval is invalidated by a court of law, the project must be reviewed by the City and substitute conditions may be imposed.

GC11. The permittee is responsible for ascertaining and paying all City fees as required by the SCMC. This condition serves as notice, pursuant to Government Code § 66020(d) that the City of Santa Clarita is imposing development impact fees (DIFs) upon the project in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000, et seq.) and the SCMC. The permittee is informed that it may protest DIFs in accordance with Government Code § 66020.

GC12. The permittee must sign these Conditions of Approval, as set forth below, to acknowledge acceptance, within 30 days from the date of approval.

GC13. The City will only issue permits for the development when the construction documents (e.g., building plans) substantially comply with the approved plans. Substantial conformity is determined by the Director.

GC14. This decision is not effective until permittee acknowledges acceptance of all project conditions and any appeal period has lapsed, or a waiver of right to appeal is filed or if there is an appeal, until a final decision has been made on the appeal. By use of the entitlements granted by a development application, the permittee acknowledges agreement with the Conditions of Approval.

GC15. Anything which is not shown on the application/plans, or which is not specifically approved, or which is not in compliance with this section, is not approved. Any application and/or plans which are defective as to, without limitation, omission, dimensions, scale, use, colors, materials, encroachments, easements, etc., will render any entitlements granted by this approval null and void. Construction must cease until all requirements of this approval are complied with. Development entitlements may be withheld until violations of the SCMC are abated.

GC16. The City will not issue a final Certificate of Occupancy until the permittee complies with all project conditions.

2.b
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) Resolution P25-08
Master Case 25-048
Conditions of Approval

Page 3 of 5 ends

GC17. The permittee must reimburse the City for all attorneys’ fees expended by the City that are directly related to the processing of this project. The City will not issue a Final Certificate of Occupancy or other final occupancy approval until all attorneys’ fees are paid by the permittee.

PLANNING DIVISION
PL1. The permittee is approved to convert the existing industrial building located at 26477 Ruether Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 2836-017-030) into a three-story self- storage facility within the existing shell building. The project consists of converting the existing approximately 39,840 square-foot industrial building into a 124,515 square-foot three-story self-storage facility within the existing shell building. Additionally, approximately 1,794 square feet of the existing loading dock area will be enclosed for additional square footage to accommodate a new lobby, two restrooms, and two elevators. The Project also includes new vehicle loading and unloading spaces; a management office on the ground floor; replacement and relocation of the existing access gate; a new six-foot-tall perimeter wall; and refreshing the exterior paint and landscaping.

All uses, construction, and operations must be in accordance with the approved plans on file with the Planning Division that constitute the Master Case 25-048 project file.

PL2. Any change to the site plan, building elevations, or landscaping (including color, material, and architectural treatments) must be approved by the Planning Division prior to installation.

PL3. Operating hours are permitted from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays.

PL4. The code required parking for the project is nine spaces, four of which are designated for delivery and moving vans. The project will retain the existing 70 on-site parking spaces associated with the previously approved use.

PL5. A perimeter fence must be installed as approved per the plans on file under Master Case 25-048. The perimeter fence must be a minimum of six feet in height and view- obscuring.

PL6. The relocation of the existing access gate must be no closer than 20 feet from the public right of way.

PL7. All associated activities, including parking and unloading, must be screened from public view.

PL8. Approval for this use must neither supersede nor supplant the required approval from other applicable City divisions or government agencies, and must comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations, including but not limited to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

2.b
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) Resolution P25-08
Master Case 25-048
Conditions of Approval

Page 4 of 5 ends

PL9. No signage is approved as part of this application. All proposed signage will be reviewed under a separate permit by the Planning Division and must conform to SCMC Section

17.51.080 or an approved sign program.

LANDSCAPE
LR1. Before the Building Official issues a final certificate of occupancy, the permittee must restore all landscaping as approved under landscaping plans associated with Master Case 12-144. The permittee is required to replace all dead trees and landscaping in kind.

However, the permittee may choose to replace any dead oak trees with a suitable replacement tree.

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION
TE1. Before the Building Official issues building permits, the permittee must pay the applicable Bridge and Thoroughfare (B&T) District Fee to implement the Circulation Element of the General Plan as a means of mitigating the traffic impact of this project.

This project is located in the Eastside B&T District. The current rate for this District is $21,530. The B&T rate is subject to change and is based on the rate at the time of payment.

B&T District fees for non-residential uses on an under-utilized parcel that does not include a land division is calculated as follows:

Retail Commercial = acres x the district rate x 5
= 2 acres x $21,530 x 5 = $215,300
= 2 acres x $21,530 x 3 = $129,180 (previously paid)
= Difference due = $86,120

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
ES1. Before the Building Official issues building permits, the permittee must submit a Construction and Demolition Materials Management Plan (CDMMP) and receive approval from the Environmental Services Manager or designee if the project meets SCMC §15.46.300.

TRANSIT DIVISION
TR1. At this time, the Transit Impact fee does not apply to commercial/industrial developments. However, this fee may apply in the future. Permittee must pay the fee in place at the time the Building Official issues a building permit.

SPECIAL DISTRICTS DIVISION
Landscape Maintenance District
SD1. This parcel is located within Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) Areawide Zone 2008-1. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the

2.b
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) Resolution P25-08
Master Case 25-048
Conditions of Approval

Page 5 of 5 ends

permittee will be required to financially contribute to the Areawide Zone in a manner reflective of this LMD zone’s assessment methodology.

SD2. Existing streetlights must be protected and preserved in place. Any existing streetlight which is proposed for removal and/or relocation must be approved by Special Districts, SMD (Streetlight Maintenance Districts).

Urban Forestry
UF1. All existing oak trees must be preserved. There is no requirement to obtain an oak tree permit to remove a dead oak tree. Additionally, there is no requirement to replace the dead oak tree.

2.b
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) Aerial & Zoning Map
26477 Ruether Avenue
Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-017-030
Master Case 25-048; Conditional Use Permit 25-004; Development Review 25-006 Proposed Self-Storage Facility

Figure 1: Aerial Map

Project Site

2.c
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Aerial and Zoning Map (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048))

Figure 2: Zoning Map

Zoning Key

Business Park

Public/Institution (Santa Clarita Sports Complex)
Project Site

2.c
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Aerial and Zoning Map (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048))

Site Plan, Floor Plans, & Elevations
26477 Ruether Avenue
Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-017-030
Master Case 25-048; Conditional Use Permit 25-004; Development Review 25-006 Proposed Self-Storage Facility

2.d
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Site Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevations (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048))

NOPARKINGNOPARKING (E) TRASHENCLOSURE
R U E T H E R A V E N U E(65 FT.)
UP
K
K
UP
120'-0"
18'-0"9'-0"TYP.28'-6"
(N)LOBBY

ELEV(N)EMRJANITORUNISEXUNISEX
(E)STAIR 2
(N)DAS(E)STAIR 1ELECFIRE
ELEV
OFFICE
PROPOSED 3-STORY124,515 G.S.F.
44'-6"5'9' 5'12'9'
9'TYP. 9'TYP. 9'TYP.18'
18'
18'28'-6"
360'-0"
148'-4" 154'-4"51'-4"
94'-0"26'-0"
28'-6"(E) DRIVEWAY3 3
6 5 14 1
9 9
10 6
9'TYP.18'
28'-6"18'
(N)GATE
T
105'-0"
342'-5"'(N) 6' HIGH TUBE STEEL PICKET FENCE W/SCREEN AT EXISTING RETAINING WALL 200'-9"(N) 6' HIGH TUBE STEEL PICKET FENCE W/SCREEN AT EXISTING RETAINING WALL 455.73'
210.82'OFFICEENTRY

SELF-STORAGE ENTRY

PEDESTRIAN ROUTE
43'-6"(E) CURB CUT
105'-7"RETAINING WALL
6' HIGH TUBESTEEL PICKETFENCE W/SCREENVAN

RETAINING WALL

DELIVERYVANDELIVERYVAN
MOVING VAN12'-0"
REMOVE (E) FENCE AND INSTALLNEW 6' HIGH TUBE STEEL PICKETFENCE W/ SCREEN 20'-0"
NOPARKINGEVSEEVCHARGINGONLY18'-0"
EVSE EVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCS9'5'12'9' EVSE

EVCSEVCSEVCSEVCS
5'-6"
7'-0"

SPACE IS OPENTO SKY
SPACE ISOPEN TO SKY20'-0"26'-0"
24'-0"24'-0"
20'-0"MOVING VAN

LOADINGLOADINGNOPARKINGNOPARKING (E) TRASHENCLOSURE
R U E T H E R A V E N U E(65 FT.)
UP
K
K
UP
120'-0"
18'-0"9'-0"TYP.28'-6"
(N)LOBBY

ELEV(N)EMRJANITORUNISEXUNISEX
(E)STAIR 2
(N)DAS(E)STAIR 1ELECFIRE
ELEV
OFFICE
PROPOSED 3-STORY124,515 G.S.F.
44'-6"5'9' 5'12'9'
9'TYP. 9'TYP. 9'TYP.18'
18'
18'28'-6"
360'-0"
148'-4" 154'-4"51'-4"
94'-0"26'-0"
28'-6"(E) DRIVEWAY3 3
6 5 14 1
9 9
10 6
9'TYP.18'
28'-6"18'
(N)GATE
T
105'-0"
342'-5"'(N) 6' HIGH TUBE STEEL PICKET FENCE W/SCREEN AT EXISTING RETAINING WALL 200'-9"(N) 6' HIGH TUBE STEEL PICKET FENCE W/SCREEN AT EXISTING RETAINING WALL 455.73'
210.82'OFFICEENTRY

SELF-STORAGE ENTRY

PEDESTRIAN ROUTE
43'-6"(E) CURB CUT
105'-7"RETAINING WALL
6' HIGH TUBESTEEL PICKETFENCE W/SCREENVAN

RETAINING WALL

DELIVERYVANDELIVERYVAN
MOVING VAN12'-0"
REMOVE (E) FENCE AND INSTALLNEW 6' HIGH TUBE STEEL PICKETFENCE W/ SCREEN 20'-0"
NOPARKINGEVSEEVCHARGINGONLY18'-0"
EVSE EVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCS9'5'12'9' EVSE

EVCSEVCSEVCSEVCS
5'-6"
7'-0"

SPACE IS OPENTO SKY
SPACE ISOPEN TO SKY20'-0"26'-0"
24'-0"24'-0"
20'-0"MOVING VAN

LOADINGLOADINGNOPARKINGNOPARKING (E) TRASHENCLOSURE
R U E T H E R A V E N U E(65 FT.)
UP
K
K
UP
120'-0"
18'-0"9'-0"TYP.28'-6"
(N)LOBBY

ELEV(N)EMRJANITORUNISEXUNISEX
(E)STAIR 2
(N)DAS(E)STAIR 1ELECFIRE
ELEV
OFFICE
PROPOSED 3-STORY124,515 G.S.F.
44'-6"5'9' 5'12'9'
9'TYP. 9'TYP. 9'TYP.18'
18'
18'28'-6"
360'-0"
148'-4" 154'-4"51'-4"
94'-0"26'-0"
28'-6"(E) DRIVEWAY3 3
6 5 14 1
9 9
10 6
9'TYP.18'
28'-6"18'
(N)GATE
T
105'-0"
342'-5"'(N) 6' HIGH TUBE STEEL PICKET FENCE W/SCREEN AT EXISTING RETAINING WALL 200'-9"(N) 6' HIGH TUBE STEEL PICKET FENCE W/SCREEN AT EXISTING RETAINING WALL 455.73'
210.82'OFFICEENTRY

SELF-STORAGE ENTRY

PEDESTRIAN ROUTE
43'-6"(E) CURB CUT
105'-7"RETAINING WALL
6' HIGH TUBESTEEL PICKETFENCE W/SCREENVAN

RETAINING WALL

DELIVERYVANDELIVERYVAN
MOVING VAN12'-0"
REMOVE (E) FENCE AND INSTALLNEW 6' HIGH TUBE STEEL PICKETFENCE W/ SCREEN 20'-0"
NOPARKINGEVSEEVCHARGINGONLY18'-0"
EVSE EVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCS9'5'12'9' EVSE

EVCSEVCSEVCSEVCS
5'-6"
7'-0"

SPACE IS OPENTO SKY
SPACE ISOPEN TO SKY20'-0"26'-0"
24'-0"24'-0"
20'-0"MOVING VAN

LOADINGLOADING
S T U D I Oarchitecture + engineering23 ORCHARD ROAD, SUITE 200LAKE FOREST,CA 92630T 949.380.3970 F 949.380.3771 26477 RUETHER AVENUESANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA 91350DATE: 06-04-2025 SUBMITTAL 0103.24.2025SUBMITTAL 0206.04.2025
NORTH SITE PLANSHEET 2
(E) PARKING(E) PARKING (E) PARKING
(E) PARKING

FIRE ACCESS

FIRE ACCESS

FIRE ACCESS

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE LANDSCAPELANDSCAPE

LANDSCAPE
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
(E) PARKING
(E) PARKING
PROPOSED BUILDING124,515 G.S.F.TYPE III-B (3) STORY
020'10'40' 5'scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"
(E) EMPLOYEEBREAK AREAWITH BENCHTABLE
(N) SIDEWALK
(E) POWER POLE

TRASHRECEPTACLE

2.d
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Site Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevations (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) 12345678910111213141516171837

CDEFGHJ
AB
KLMN
192021222324252627282930313233343536 360' 10'-8"10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'3'-8"10'-8"10'10'10'10'-8"10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10' 1234567891011121314151617
10'-8"10'5'-4"10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'9' 120'
38 1837 19202122232425262728293031323334353638
10'7'-8"6'-8"
P

CDEFGHJ
AB
KLMNP 5'
STAIR 01UP

FIRE RISER
K
K
LOBBYUNISEX 01UNISEX 02
JANITORELEV 1ELEV 2
STAIR 02UP DASELECTRICROOM
EMR

STAIR ROOFACCESS TO BEDEMOLISHED
FIRST FLOOR41,505 G.S.F.

THE OPENINGSWILL BE CLOSED

THE OPENINGWILL BE CLOSEDTHE EXISTING OPENINGWILL BE REPLACED INFILL EXISTINGROLE UP & MANDOOR OFFICE

INFILL EXISTINGROLE UP & MANDOOR
5x5
5x55x55x5
10x1510x1510x15
10x10
10x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x15
5x5
10x8
10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x10 10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x105x10 10x10
10x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x5
10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x10 10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x10 5x105x105x105x10
5x5
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x2010x205x55x55x5 5x5
5x55x55x5
5x55x55x55x5
5x5
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x2010x20 10x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x813.6x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x8 7.6x8 5x55x55x5
5x55x55x55x5
5x510x8

13.6x1010x20
10x20

13.6x1013.6x1013.6x10
10x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x20

12.6x1012.6x1012.6x1012.6x10
10x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x20
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x205x55x55x5
5x55x55x55x5
5x5
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x20 10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x20
10x2010x20

12.6x10

12.6x1012.6x10
5x1010x1010x10
10x15 10x1510x155x510x510x1510x1510x1510x15 15x15

13.6x1013.6x1013.6x10
17x20 13x1511x15
5x55x55x5
5x55x55x55x5
5x510x1510x15
10x1010x10
10x1010x105x10
5x10 5x105x10228'
220'220'
S T U D I Oarchitecture + engineering23 ORCHARD ROAD, SUITE 200LAKE FOREST,CA 92630T 949.380.3970 F 949.380.3771 26477 RUETHER AVENUESANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA 91350DATE: 06-04-2025 SUBMITTAL 0103.24.2025SUBMITTAL 0206.04.2025 1ST FLOOR PLANSHEET 3.1NORTH012'6'24' 3'scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"

2.d
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Site Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevations (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) 12345678910111213141516171837

CDEFGHJ
AB
KLMN
192021222324252627282930313233343536 360' 10'-8"10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'3'-8"10'-8"10'10'10'10'-8"10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10' 1234567891011121314151617
10'-8"10'5'-4"10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'9' 120'
38 1837 19202122232425262728293031323334353638
10'7'-8"6'-8"
P

CDEFGHJ
AB
KLMNP 5'
(E)STAIR 02
(E)STAIR 01DNUP
DNUP
SECONDFLOOR41,505 G.S.F.
(N) LOBBYELEV 1ELEV 25x5
5x55x55x5
5x5
10x8
10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x10 10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x105x10 10x10
10x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x5
10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x10 10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x10 5x105x105x105x10
5x5
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x2010x205x55x55x5 5x5
5x55x55x5
5x55x55x55x5
5x5
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x2010x20 10x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x813.6x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x8 7.6x8 10x8 10x1510x1510x1510x1510x55x5
5x10 5x10
10x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1513x15
5x55x55x5
5x55x55x55x5
5x513.6x1010x20
10x20

13.6x1013.6x1013.6x10
10x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x20

12.6x1012.6x1012.6x1012.6x10
10x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x20
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x205x55x55x5
5x55x55x55x5
5x5
5x5 10x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x5 10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x105x10 10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x10 10x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x15 10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x10 10x1010x1010x10
5x10
5x55x55x5 12.6x1012.6x10

12.6x1012.6x10
10x1010x10
5x10
5x510x1510x15
10x1310x1310x1310x13

13.6x1013.6x1013.6x10

13.6x1010x1010x1010x10

12.6x510x2010x2010x1510x1510x155x5
7x10
S T U D I Oarchitecture + engineering23 ORCHARD ROAD, SUITE 200LAKE FOREST,CA 92630T 949.380.3970 F 949.380.3771 26477 RUETHER AVENUESANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA 91350DATE: 06-04-2025 SUBMITTAL 0103.24.2025SUBMITTAL 0206.04.2025 2ND FLOOR PLANSHEET 3.2NORTH012'6'24' 3'scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"

2.d
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Site Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevations (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) 12345678910111213141516171837

CDEFGHJ
AB
KLMN
192021222324252627282930313233343536 360' 10'-8"10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'3'-8"10'-8"10'10'10'10'-8"10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10' 1234567891011121314151617
10'-8"10'5'-4"10'10'10'10'10'10'10'10'9' 120'
38 1837 19202122232425262728293031323334353638
10'7'-8"6'-8"
P

CDEFGHJ
AB
KLMNP 5'
(E)STAIR 02
(E)STAIR 01DNUP
DNUP
THIRDFLOOR41,505 G.S.F.
(N)UNISEX 01FD
(N)LOBBYELEV 1ELEV 2
5x55x55x5
5x5
10x8
10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x105x10
10x10
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x2010x205x55x55x5 5x5
5x55x55x5
5x55x55x55x5
5x5
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x2010x20 10x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x813.6x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x810x8 7.6x8 10x8 5x55x55x5
5x55x55x55x5
5x513.6x1010x20
10x20

13.6x1013.6x1013.6x10
10x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x20

12.6x1012.6x1012.6x1012.6x10
10x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x20
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x2010x205x55x55x5
5x55x55x55x5
5x5
5x5 10x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x5 10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x105x10 10x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x15 5x10
5x55x55x5 12.6x1012.6x10

12.6x1012.6x10
10x1010x10
5x10
5x510x1510x15
10x1310x1310x1310x13

13.6x1013.6x1013.6x10

13.6x1010x1010x1010x10

12.6x510x2010x2010x1510x155x5
7x10 10x10
5x10
5x5 10x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x5 10x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x1010x105x10 10x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x15 5x10
5x55x55x5
5x55x10
5x10
5x55x55x55x55x5

13.6x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x10 5x105x105x105x105x105x1010x10 5x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x10 5x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x105x10 5x105x10 S T U D I Oarchitecture + engineering23 ORCHARD ROAD, SUITE 200LAKE FOREST,CA 92630T 949.380.3970 F 949.380.3771 26477 RUETHER AVENUESANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA 91350DATE: 06-04-2025 SUBMITTAL 0103.24.2025SUBMITTAL 0206.04.2025 3RD FLOOR PLANSHEET 3.3NORTH012'6'24' 3'scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"

2.d
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Site Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevations (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048)) LEVEL 10.000LEVEL 210'-4"LEVEL 320'-8"ROOF31'-0"PARAPET38'-0" 10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"7'38'

INFILL EXISTINGROLL UP & MANDOORINFILL EXISTINGROLL UP & MANDOOR LEVEL 10.000LEVEL 210'-4"LEVEL 320'-8"ROOF31'-0"PARAPET38'-0" 10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"7'38'
INFILL EXISTINGROLL UP & MANDOORLEVEL 10.000LEVEL 210'-4"LEVEL 320'-8"ROOF31'-0"PARAPET38'-0" 38'
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"7'38'
10'-4"10'-4"10'-4"7'
S T U D I Oarchitecture + engineering23 ORCHARD ROAD, SUITE 200LAKE FOREST,CA 92630T 949.380.3970 F 949.380.3771 26477 RUETHER AVENUESANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA 91350DATE: 03-27-2025 SUBMITTAL 0103.24.2025 PROPOSED ELEVATIONSSHEET 5.1

EAST ELEVATIONWEST ELEVATION

NORTH ELEVATION

SOUTH ELEVATION
020'10'40' 5'scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"
06-04-2025

2.d
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Site Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevations (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048))

Photo Simulation
26477 Ruether Avenue
Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-017-030
Master Case 25-048; Conditional Use Permit 25-004; Development Review 25-006 Proposed Self-Storage Facility

2.e
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Photo Simulation (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048))

2.e
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Photo Simulation (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048))

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302
Santa Clarita, CA 91355

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

APPLICATION: Master Case 25-048; Conditional Use Permit 25-004; Development Review 25-006

PROJECT APPLICANT: LaTerra SS Investors III, LLC (c/o Allen Park and Bryan Miranda)

PROJECT LOCATION: 26477 Ruether Avenue
(Assessor’s Parcel Number: 2836-017-030)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit and a Development Review for a new self-storage facility. The self-storage facility is proposed within an existing industrial building. The project proposes interior improvements to convert an existing one-story industrial building into a three-story, self-storage facility entirely within the existing building envelope. The project will not alter the existing building height; the building will remain 35 feet in height with a three-foot parapet.

The total floor area would increase from approximately 39,840 square feet to 124,515 square feet.

Additionally, approximately 1,794 square feet of the existing loading dock area would be enclosed to accommodate a new lobby, two restrooms, and two elevato rs. The site is zoned Business Park in the community of Canyon Country.

The City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on this matter on the following date:

DATE: Tuesday, August 19, 2025
TIME: At or after 6:00 p.m.

LOCATION: City Hall, Council Chambers
23920 Valencia Blvd., First Floor,
Santa Clarita, CA 91355

The Planning Commission agenda can be found at www.santaclarita.gov/agendas by August 15, 2025.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act as a Class 1 Existing Facilities exemption, pursuant to Article 19 Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301. A Class 1 exemption consists of the operation, repair, maint enance, or minor alterations of existing private structures or facilities.

If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearings described in this notice or written correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clarita at, or prior to, the public hearings. If you wish to have written comments included in the materials the Planning Commission receives prior to the public hearing, it must be submitted to the Community Development Department by Friday, August 8, 2025.

For further information regarding this proposal, you may contact the project planner at the City of Santa Clarita, Permit Center, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 140, Santa Clarita, CA 91355 . Telephone: (661) 255- 4330. Website: www.santaclarita.gov/planning . Send written correspondence to 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 302, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Project Planner: Marlene Mancia, Assistant Pl anner II, [email protected].

Patrick Leclair
Planning Manager

Published: The Signal, July 29, 2025

2.f
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Public Noticing (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048))

PROPOSED PROJECT SITE
26477 Ruether Avenue
Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-017-030
Master Case 25-048; Conditional Use Permit 25-004; Development Review 25-006 Proposed Self-Storage Facility

Project Site

2.f
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Public Noticing (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048))

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION

TO: FROM:
[X] County Clerk City of Santa Clarita
County of Los Angeles Community Development
12400 E. Imperial Hwy., Rm. 2001 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite #302 Norwalk, CA 90650 Santa Clarita, CA 91355

[ ] Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
DATE: August 20, 2025

PROJECT NAME: Master Case 2 5-048, Conditional Use Permit 2 5-004, and Development Review 25-006

PROJECT APPLICANT: LaTerra SS Investors III, LLC (c/o Allen Park and Bryan Miranda)

PROJECT LOCATION: 26477 Ruether Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-017-030)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The permittee is approved to convert the existing industrial building located at 26477 Ruether Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 2836-017-030) into a three-story self-storage facility within the existing shell building. The project consists of converting the existing approximately 39,840 square-foot industrial building into a 124,515 square-foot three-story self-storage facility within the existing shell building. Additionally, approximately 1,794 square feet of the existing loading dock area will be enclosed for additional square footage to accommodate a new lobby, two restrooms, and two elevators. The Project also includes new vehicle loading and unloading spaces; a management office on the ground floor; replacement and relocation of the existing access gate; a new six-foot-tall perimeter wall; and refreshing the exterior paint and landscaping.

This is to advise that the [ ] Director of Public Works [X] Planning Commission [ ] City Council of the City of Santa Clarita has approved the above project on August 19, 2025. Review of the project by the Department of Community Development found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.

EXEMPT STATUS: The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Article 19 Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Class 1. A Class 1 includes the minor alteration of existing public or private structures and facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The Project consists of the revitalization of an underused site with additional square footage under the threshold identified in the CEQA guidelines.

Person or agency carrying out the project: City of Santa Clarita, Community Development Department

This is to certify that the Notice of Exemption with comments/responses and record of project approval is available for public review at:

City of Santa Clarita
Community Development Department
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302
Santa Clarita, California 91355
(661) 255-4330

Contact Person/Title: Marlene Mancia, Assistant Planner II

Signature:

S:\CD\!PLANNING DIVISION\CURRENT\!2025\MC25-048 (CUP for Self Storage on Ruether)\10. NOE\Notice of Exemption.doc

2.g
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Notice of Exemption (Ruether Self-Storage Facility (MC25-048))

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 3

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

PLANNING COMMISSION

AGENDA REPORT

PUBLIC HEARINGS

PLANNING MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: August 19, 2025
SUBJECT: Marathon Trucks (Master Case 24-104)
APPLICANT: Marathon Trucking (Chad Hess)
LOCATION: 20950 Centre Pointe Parkway
CASE PLANNER: Emily Rubalcava

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Planning Commission:

1. Conduct the public hearing;

2. Determine that the project is exempt from additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code of Regs. § 15000, et seq.) Section 15301 as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption;

3. Adopt Resolution P25-10 approving Master Case 24-104 (Conditional Use Permit 24-005 and Development Review 24-009) to retroactively permit the operation of an auto body repair and painting use, Marathon Trucks, in an existing industrial building at the southeast intersection of Centre Pointe Parkway and Golden Valley Road (Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-018-047), subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A); and

4. Take other action as determined by the Planning Commission.

REQUEST
The applicant, Marathon Trucks, is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Development Review (DR) to occupy an existing 78,000 square-foot industrial building for the operation of a new auto body repair and painting use within the Business Park (BP) zone. The project includes the installation of two interior spray booths, along with new landscaping and paving improvements in the existing parking lot areas.
3 Packet Pg. 63

Page 2 ends

BACKGROUND
On May 8, 2024, the City of Santa Clarita (City) received an application for a new auto body repair and painting use within an existing industrial building in the BP zone and within the community of Canyon Country.

In 2007, Marathon Trucks began operations within the City at 25597 Springbrook Avenue, located adjacent to Railroad Avenue and south of Drayton Street. Marathon Trucks manufactures, assembles, installs and repairs truck bodies, trailers and transportation equipment.

The business moved locations to the project site in early 2024.

On April 25, 2024, Marathon Trucks was cited by the City’s Community Preservation Division for the operation of an auto body repair and painting use in the BP zone without a CUP. On July 22, 2024, Marathon Trucks was issued a Stop Work Order by the City’s Building & Safety Division for construction related to a tenant improvement project which was being constructed without building permits. The applicant has submitted this application for a CUP in order to retroactively permit Marathon Trucks’ operations on site. If approved, the code case would be resolved and built out accordingly.

Before Marathon Trucks, the building at 20950 Centre Pointe Parkway was occupied by a pharmaceutical company, Blue Cross Laboratories.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SETTING
Site Setting
The project site is located at the southeast intersection of Centre Pointe Parkway and Golden Valley Road, adjacent to the Santa Clarita Sports Complex. There is one industrial building in the center of the approximately six-acre site. Two parking areas serve the building, one positioned at the front of the building and one at the rear. Access is taken from Centre Pointe Parkway through an existing fire access road that spans the west perimeter of the site.

The project site and surrounding area is shown in the attached Aerial and Zoning Map.

Development Proposal

The applicant proposes to permit the auto body repair and painting use in an existing 78,000 square foot industrial building on site. The project includes the installation of two interior spray booths, along with new landscaping and paving improvements to the two existing parking lot areas. Additionally, the project will demolish one existing unpermitted structure attached to the rear of the building, install one roll-up door, and a new trash enclosure. There are 140 parking spaces provided on site. An auto body repair and painting use is permitted in the BP zone with the approval of a CUP.

Entitlement Summary

Implementation of the project will require the approval of the following entitlements:
3 Packet Pg. 64

Page 3 ends

Conditional Use Permit 24-005
Required to allow for an auto body repair and painting use within the BP zone.

Development Review 24-009
Required to ensure that the on-site improvements comply with all of the provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC), the General Plan, and other applicable requirements.

GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USES

The General Plan and zoning designation for the subject property is BP. The BP zoning designation “provides for mixed employment districts in areas accessible to transportation and visible from freeways and major arterials and is intended to promote the development of master- planned environments with a high quality of design and construction” (SCMC § 17.34.040). The subject site is surrounded by commercial development to the north, industrial development to the south and west, and the Santa Clarita Sports Complex to the east.

Table 1 summarizes the General Plan designations, zoning, and land uses for the project site and adjacent properties.

Table 1 - General Plan, Zoning, and Land Uses
General Plan Zoning Land Use
Project Site BP BP Proposed auto body repair and
painting use
North BP BP Vacant Land (LADWP transmission
lines), LA Fitness
South BP BP Element U.S Space and Defense
Laboratory
East BP BP, PI Vacant Land (LADWP transmission
lines), Santa Clarita Sports Complex
West BP BP Pacific Industrial building (under
construction)
Key: PI = Public/Institutional

ANALYSIS
General Plan Compliance
The project is consistent with the General Plan. The City’s Land Use Element addresses the new auto body repair and painting use in the policies below:

Policy LU 4.1.4: Promote economic opportunity for all segments of the community, including small businesses and new businesses.

Policy LU 4.2.3: Encourage businesses to locate in all appropriate areas of the community to encourage job creation in closer proximity to 3 Packet Pg. 65

Page 4 ends

workforce housing.

Policy LU 7.1.1: Require shade trees within parking lots and adjacent to buildings to reduce the heat island effect, in consideration of Fire Department fuel modification restrictions.

The project would reuse an existing industrial building within a designated Business Park zone, promoting economic activity and job creation within the community. The proposed auto body repair and painting facility would activate an underutilized property with a use compatible with surrounding industrial operations. The project includes improvements to the existing parking lot layout, new paving, and upgraded landscaping. The proposed landscape plan includes planting of shade trees, as required by the SCMC, throughout the parking areas and the site’s perimeter, enhancing the visual appeal and reducing the heat island effect of the site.

SCMC Code Compliance
Based on the City’s SCMC, a CUP is required for an auto body repair and painting use in the BP zone. With approval of a CUP, the applicant would be able to address the existing violations and apply for the appropriate building permits. The project is consistent with all development standards for the proposed use and SCMC section 17.63.050, “Vehicle Repair Garages.” This includes conducting all truck repair operations and storage of goods and equipment within the existing building. Parking is sufficient for the proposed use and meets the standards required by SCMC Section 17.51.060. The project meets the design standards of SCMC section 17.51.030, “Landscaping and Irrigation Standards.” With the implementation of the Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is consistent with all applicable standards outlined in the SCMC.

ENVIRONMENTAL

The project is exempt from additional environmental review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1. A Class 1 exemption consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures. Accordingly, a Notice of Exemption was prepared for this project and is included as an attachment.

NOTICING

All notices as required by law were completed. Property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site were notified of the public hearing by mail (32 notices). A public notice was placed in The Signal on July 29, 2025 and a sign was posted on the project site on August 5, 2025. As of the publishing of this agenda, the Planning Division has received no comment letters in regards to the project.

CONCLUSION

The retroactive approval of the proposed auto body repair and painting project would be consistent with the provisions outlined in the General Plan and SCMC. Therefore, staff has drafted the necessary findings for approval of the CUP and associated entitlements, as set forth in 3 Packet Pg. 66

Page 5 ends

SCMC section 17.25.100, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A).

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution P25-10
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
Aerial and Zoning Map
Site, Floor, & Elevation Plans
Landscape Plans
Notice of Exemption
Public Notice
3 Packet Pg. 67
RESOLUTION P25-10

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING MASTER CASE 24-104, CONSISTING OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 24-005 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 24-009 FOR THE RETROACTIVE APPROVAL OF AN AUTO BODY REPAIR

AND PAINTING USE, MARATHON TRUCKS, IN AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 20950 CENTRE POINTE PARKWAY (ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER: 2836-018-047), IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (EXHIBIT A).

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR MASTER CASE 24-104. The Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact:

A. An application for Master Case 24-104 (Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-005 and Development Review (DR) 24-009) was filed by Chad Hess, representing Marathon Trucks (applicant), with the City of Santa Clarita (City) on May 8, 2024 (project). The property for which this application was filed is Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-018-047 (subject site); B. The applicant proposes to retroactively permit an auto body repair and painting use within an existing 78,000 square-foot industrial building on site. The project includes the installation of two interior spray booths, along with new landscaping and paving improvements to the two existing parking lot areas. Additionally, the project will demolish one existing unpermitted structure attached to the rear of the building, install one roll-up door, and a new trash enclosure. There are 140 parking spaces provided on site; C. The zoning and General Plan designation for the subject site are Business Park (BP); D. The subject site is surrounded by commercial development to the north, industrial development to the south and west, and the Santa Clarita Sports Complex to the east.

E. The City reviewed the project’s environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”);
F. The applicant was cited by the City’s Community Preservation Division for the operation of an auto body repair and painting use in the BP zone without a CUP on April 25, 2024; G. A Stop Work Order by the City’s Building & Safety Division was issued for construction related to a tenant improvement project without building permits on July 22, 2024; H. This application for a CUP was submitted in order to retroactively permit Marathon Trucks’ operations on site, and was deemed complete on May 14, 2025; I. On August 19, 2025, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City of Santa Clarita

3.a
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Resolution P25-10 (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks) Resolution No. P25-10
Master Case 24-104
August 19, 2025

Page 2 of 5 ends

Planning Commission at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita;
J. At this public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the staff report, staff presentation, applicant’s presentation, and public testimony; and K. This Resolution and its findings are made based upon the entire administrative record including, without limitation, testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at its August 19, 2025, public hearing including, without limitation, the staff report.

SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF MASTER CASE 24-104. Based upon the foregoing facts and findings, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows:

A. The project was reviewed pursuant to CEQA (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations §§15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). Based upon that review, this action is exempt from further review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), since none of the circumstances listed in CEQA Guidelines § 15300.2 exist; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. A Class 1 exemption consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures. The auto body repair and painting use qualifies as a Class 1 exemption for the operation of a new business within an existing building; B. A Notice of Exemption for this project was prepared in compliance with CEQA; C. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the Planning Commission is based is the Master Case 24-104 project file, located within the Community Development Department and in the custody of the Director of Community Development; and
D. Based upon the findings set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby finds the Notice of Exemption for this project has been prepared in compliance with CEQA.

SECTION 3. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE 24-104. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-104, the Planning Commission determines as follows:

A. That the proposal is consistent with the General Plan;

The project is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan and the underlying land use designation of BP for the subject site.

The proposed project would be consistent with the following policies of the General Plan:

3.a
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Resolution P25-10 (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks) Resolution No. P25-10
Master Case 24-104
August 19, 2025

Page 3 of 5 ends

Policy LU 4.1.4: Promote economic opportunity for all segments of the community, including small businesses and new businesses.

Policy LU 4.2.3: Encourage businesses to locate in all appropriate areas of the community to encourage job creation in closer proximity to workforce housing.

Policy LU 7.1.1: Require shade trees within parking lots and adjacent to buildings to reduce the heat island effect, in consideration of Fire Department fuel modification restrictions.

The project supports the reuse of an existing industrial building within a designated Business Park zone, promoting economic activity and job creation within the community.

The proposed auto body repair and painting facility activates an underutilized property with a use that is compatible with surrounding industrial operations. The project includes improvements to the parking lot layout, new paving, and upgraded landscaping. The provided landscape plan incorporates additional shade trees throughout the parking areas and the site’s perimeter, enhancing the visual appeal and reducing the heat island effect of the site.

B. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC);

Based on the SCMC, a CUP is required for an auto body repair and painting use in the BP zone. With approval of a CUP, the applicant would be able to address the existing violations and apply for the appropriate building permits. The project is consistent with all development standards for the proposed use and SCMC section 17.63.050, “Vehicle Repair Garages.” This includes conducting all truck repair operations and storage of goods and equipment within the existing building. Parking is sufficient for the proposed use and meets the standards required by SCMC Section 17.51.060. The project meets the design standards of SCMC section 17.51.030, “Landscaping and Irrigation Standards.” With the implementation of the Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is consistent with all applicable standards outlined in the SCMC.

C. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and
The proposed project is located on a developed site surrounded by existing business park and commercial development and would comply with all of the City’s Building & Safety requirements and all requirements of the Los Angeles County Consolidated Fire Protection District (Fire Department). The project would include all appropriate access routes for pedestrians and vehicles. Therefore, the project would not be detrimental to the public’s

3.a
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Resolution P25-10 (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks) Resolution No. P25-10
Master Case 24-104
August 19, 2025

Page 4 of 5 ends

health, safety, or welfare, nor would it be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.

D. The proposal is physically suitable for the site. The factors related to the proposal’s physical suitability for the site shall include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for the proposed use;

2. The highways or streets that provide access to the site are of sufficient width and are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such proposal would generate;

3. Public protection services (e.g. Fire protection, Sheriff protection, etc.) are readily available; and

4. The provision of utilities (e.g. potable water, schools. Solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.) is adequate to serve the site.

The subject site and existing building can accommodate the proposed auto body repair and painting use. The building is located in the center of the overall property and is accessed through an existing fire access lane from Centre Pointe Parkway with sufficient space along the project’s perimeter for large trucks and vehicles. Additionally, the project is required to comply with the SCMC which establishes requirements for drive aisle widths, driveway widths and lengths, landscape, site circulation, etc. The subject site is located on a developed site that contains all needed utilities and facilities for connection. The area is already served by public protection services and has utility service. Therefore, the project is physically suitable for the subject site.

SECTION 4: DETERMINATION; APPROVALS. Subject to the conditions of approval attached as Exhibit “A,” and incorporated by reference, Master Case 24-104, Conditional Use Permit 24-005 and Development Review 24-009, is approved for the retroactive operation of an auto body repair and painting use in an existing industrial building at 20950 Centre Pointe Parkway (Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-018-047).

SECTION 5: RELIANCE ON RECORD. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the Planning Commission in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.

SECTION 6: SUMMARIES OF INFORMATION. All summaries of information in the

3.a
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Resolution P25-10 (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks) Resolution No. P25-10
Master Case 24-104
August 19, 2025

Page 5 of 5 ends

findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.

SECTION 7: NOTICE. The Secretary is directed to provide a copy of this Resolution to the Planning Commission and any other person requesting a copy.

SECTION 8: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution becomes effective immediately upon adoption and memorializes the Planning Commission’s final decision made on August 19, 2025.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of August, 2025.

LISA EICHMAN, CHAIRPERSON

PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:

RACHEL CLARK, SECRETARY

PLANNING COMMISSION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

I, Rachel Clark, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19th day of August, 2025, by the following vote of the Planning Commission:

AYES: COMMISSIONERS:

NOES: COMMISSIONERS:

ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:

PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY

3.a
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Resolution P25-10 (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks)

EXHIBIT A

DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RESOLUTION P25-10
MASTER CASE 24-104:

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 24-005 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 24-009

In addition to all applicable provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC), Marathon Industries, Inc. (permittee) agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of Santa Clarita’s approval of Master Case 24-104.

GENERAL CONDITIONS
GC1. The approval of this project will expire if the approved use is not commenced within two years from the date of this approval, unless it is extended in accordance with the terms and provisions of the SCMC
GC2. To the extent the use approved with this project is a different use than previously approved for the property, the prior approval is terminated along with any associated vested rights to such use, unless such prior approved use is still in operation, or is still within the initial pre-commencement approval period. Once commenced, any discontinuation of the use approved with this project for a continuous period of two years or more terminates the approval of this use along with any associated vested rights to such use. The use may not be re-established or resumed after the two-year period.

Discontinuation includes cessation of a use regardless of intent to resume.

GC3. The permittee may file for an extension of the CUP before the date of expiration. If such an extension is requested, it must be filed not later than 60 days before the date of expiration.

GC4. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, the term “permittee” includes the permittee and any other persons, corporation, or other entity making use of this grant. The permittee must defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Santa Clarita, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this project by the City, including any related environmental approvals. In the event the City becomes aware of any such claim, action, or proceeding, the City will promptly notify the permittee. If the City fails to notify the permittee or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee is not thereafter responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. Nothing contained in this condition prohibits the City from participating in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, if both of the following occur: 1) the City bears its own attorneys’ fees and costs; and 2) the City defends the action in good faith. The permittee is not required to pay or perform any settlement unless the settlement is approved by the permittee.

GC5. The permittee and property owner must comply with all inspections requirements as deemed necessary by the Director.

3.b
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks)

Master Case 24-104, Conditional Use Permit 24-005 and Development Review 24-009 Conditions of Approval
August 19, 2025

Page 2 of 6 ends

GC6. The project site must be developed and/or used in the manner requested and must be in substantial conformity with the submitted plans date-stamped unless revisions and/or additional conditions are specifically required herein.

GC7. This approval runs with the land. All rights and obligations of this approval, including the responsibility to comply with the Conditions of Approval, are binding upon Permittee’s successors in interest. The Conditions of Approval may be modified, terminated, or abandoned in accordance with applicable law including, without limitation, the SCMC.

GC8. Any proposed deviations from the Exhibits, Project Description, or Conditions of Approval must be submitted to the Director for review and approval. Any unapproved deviations from the project approval will constitute a violation of the permit approval.

GC9. When exhibits and/or written Conditions of Approval are in conflict, the written Conditions of Approval prevail.

GC10. The effectiveness of this project will be suspended for the time period that any Condition of Approval is appealed whether administratively or as part of a legal action filed in a court of competent jurisdiction. If any Condition of Approval is invalidated by a court of law, the project must be reviewed by the City and substitute conditions may be imposed.

GC11. The Permittee is responsible for ascertaining and paying all City fees as required by the SCMC. This condition serves as notice, pursuant to Government Code § 66020(d) that the City is imposing development impact fees (DIFs) upon the project in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000, et seq.) and the SCMC. The permittee is informed that it may protest DIFs in accordance with Government Code § 66020.

GC12. The Permittee must sign these Conditions of Approval, as set forth below, to acknowledge acceptance, within 30 days from the date of approval by the Planning Commission.

GC13. The City will only issue permits for the development when the construction documents (e.g., building plans) substantially comply with the approved plans. Substantial conformity is determined by the Director.

GC14. This decision is not effective until Permittee acknowledges acceptance of all project conditions and any appeal period has lapsed, or a waiver of right to appeal is filed or if there is an appeal, until a final decision has been made on the appeal. By use of the entitlements granted by a development application, the Permittee acknowledges agreement with the Conditions of Approval.

GC15. Anything which is not shown on the application/plans, or which is not specifically approved, or which is not in compliance with this section, is not approved. Any application and/or plans which are defective as to, without limitation, omission, dimensions, scale, use, colors, materials, encroachments, easements, etc., will render any entitlements granted by this approval null and void. Construction must cease until all

3.b
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks)

Master Case 24-104, Conditional Use Permit 24-005 and Development Review 24-009 Conditions of Approval
August 19, 2025

Page 3 of 6 ends

requirements of this approval are complied with. Development entitlements may be withheld until violations of the SCMC are abated.

GC16. The Building Official will not issue a final certificate of occupancy until the Permittee complies with all project conditions.

GC17. Permittee must reimburse the City for all attorneys' fees expended by the City that are directly related to the processing of this project. The City will not issue a Final Certificate of Occupancy or other final occupancy approval until all attorneys' fees are paid by the Permittee.

PLANNING DIVISION
PL1. The permittee is granted approval to occupy an existing 78,000 square foot industrial building on site for a new auto body repair and painting use with the installation of two interior spray booths and new landscaping and paving improvements to the two parking lot areas. The construction of the project must be consistent with the approved plans on file with the Planning Division under MC24-104. Any modification to the approved plans is subject to further review and approval of the Director.

PL2. Outdoor storage of materials and equipment is prohibited. Any loading, unloading, or temporary staging of such items must occur only as part of active operations within the designated truck parking areas and/or loading bays. All truck repair, painting, and maintenance activities must occur within the existing structure.

PL3. All unpermitted structures and uses must be removed prior to certificate of occupancy for the approved use. Any future accessory structures or other site improvements must be separately reviewed and approved by the Director.

PL4. All roof-mounted and ground-mounted equipment must be adequately screened from surrounding properties and must be enclosed within a building where possible.

PL5. All light sources must be directed downward and shielded to prevent glare and spillover from adjacent streets and properties.

PL6. Before the Building Official issues a building permits, the permittee must comply with all applicable regulations and fees of affected agencies including but not limited to the Los Angeles County Fire Department and the Air Quality Management District (AQMD).

Landscaping Conditions
LR1. Before the City Engineer issues a grading permit, the permittee must provide final landscape, lighting and irrigation plans (Landscape Document Package) for Director review and approval. The plan must be prepared by a California-registered landscape architect and must be designed with the plant palette suitable for Santa Clarita (Sunset Western Garden Book Zone 18, minimum winter night temperatures typically 20º to 30º F; maximum summer high temperatures typically 105º F to 110º F). The landscape

3.b
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks)

Master Case 24-104, Conditional Use Permit 24-005 and Development Review 24-009 Conditions of Approval
August 19, 2025

Page 4 of 6 ends

design plan must meet the design criteria of the State Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance and the SCMC.

LR2. The permittee is advised that additional fees will be required to be paid by the permittee for the review of required landscape and irrigation plans by the City’s landscape consultant based on an hourly rate. An invoice will be provided to the permittee at the completion of the review of the plans. The permittee will be required to pay all associated fees to the City before to the release of the approved landscape and irrigation plans for the project.

LR3. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install all proposed irrigation and landscaping, including irrigation controllers, staking, mulching, etc., to the satisfaction of the Director. The Director may impose inspection fees for more than one landscape installation inspection.

LR4. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must submit to the Director a letter from the project landscape architect certifying that all landscape materials and irrigation were installed and function according to the approved landscape plans.

ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION
General Requirements
EN1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit a precise grading and drainage plan to the City Engineer for review and approval. The plan must be based on a geotechnical report specifically approved by the soils engineer addresses all submitted recommendations, including pavement for parking lot.

EN2. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must construct all grading and drainage facilities within the project site, obtain final grade certifications, and a compaction report approved by the City Engineer, or designee.

Drainage Requirements
EN3. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must obtain and submit to Engineering Services Division a notarized Acceptance of Drainage Form from adjacent property owners.

Water Quality Requirements
EN4. This project will disturb less than one acre of land. Therefore, an Erosion Control Plan is required before the City Engineer issues a grading permit and the project is subject to the following minimum construction requirements:

A. Sediments from areas disturbed by construction are retained on site, using structural drainage controls to the maximum extent practicable, and stockpiles of soil are properly contained to minimize sediment transport from the site to streets, drainage facilities, or adjacent properties via runoff, vehicle tracking, or wind.

3.b
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks)

Master Case 24-104, Conditional Use Permit 24-005 and Development Review 24-009 Conditions of Approval
August 19, 2025

Page 5 of 6 ends

B. Construction-related materials, wastes, spills or residues are retained on site to minimize transport from the site to streets, drainage facilities, or adjoining properties by wind or runoff.

C. Runoff from equipment and vehicle washing are contained at construction sites unless treated to remove sediments and pollutants.

EN5. This re-development project is a development planning priority project under the City’s NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit as a development that results in the creation, addition, or replacement of 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface area on an already developed site. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit to Engineering Services Division for review and approval an Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (USMP) that incorporates appropriate post construction Best Management Practices (BMPs), maximizes pervious surfaces, and includes infiltration into the design of the project. Refer to the Low Impact Development ordinance and the County of Los Angeles Low Impact Development manual for details.

BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
Plans and Permits
BS1. Construction drawings submitted to Building & Safety must include a complete building code analysis and floor area justification for the proposed building per Chapters 5 and 6 of the California Building Standards Code. Previous building permits indicate a “Yard Agreement” to maintain a 60-foot wide clear and unobstructed open space around the entire building, to obtain unlimited building area. Any new structures within this 60-foot width are prohibited without further building area justification. CBC 507 BS2. Construction drawings must include a demolition plan of any existing facilities to be removed that will be included with the tenant improvement work.

Accessibility
BS3. All new work within the scope of this project must be fully accessible. Areas outside the scope of this project that serves the area of improvement or alteration, must be upgraded (if needed) to comply with the current accessibility requirements. Upgrades needed may include items such as a fully accessible parking space(s), rest rooms, main entrance and a path-of-travel from the public way and accessible parking space(s) to the area of improvement.

Occupancy Requirements
BS4. Projects with a change of use that results in an increased number of occupants; additional lavatories, toilets, urinals, and/or drinking fountain (Hi-Lo design) may be required. The California Plumbing Code (CPC) will be used to determine the minimum number of plumbing fixtures. (CPC Section 422, Table 422.1, and Table 4-1). Provide calculations on the plans to justify the number of plumbing fixtures proposed.

3.b
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks)

Master Case 24-104, Conditional Use Permit 24-005 and Development Review 24-009 Conditions of Approval
August 19, 2025

Page 6 of 6 ends

BS5. For projects with new storage or fixture racks over 6-ft in height, or where High-Pile Storage racks are installed, structural calculations must be provided with the plan submittal. Structural calculations must comply with the Rack Manufacturers Institute (RMI) specifications. Drilled-in anchors for rack installations must have a Statement of Special Inspection on the submitted plans.

BS6. The indoor auto-body repair facility will require an additional mechanical ventilation system per the California Mechanical Code. Any hazardous material types and quantities must be listed on the plans and indicated if any are in excess of the quantities listed in CBC Table 307.1(1). If any hazardous materials exceed the limits in the CBC Table indicated, the rooms/spaces must be designed as a group ‘H’ Occupancy with control areas shown as necessary.

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
ES1. Provide sufficient trash enclosures to house at least eight 3-yard bins. Four of the bins must be reserved for recyclable materials only. In addition, one 3-yard bin per enclosure must be added for organics recycling per SB1383.

The enclosure(s) must be shown on the site plan with dimensions and bin layout/floor plan, consistent with the surrounding architecture and must be constructed with a solid roof. Elevations for the enclosures(s) must be provided. The enclosure(s) must be located to provide convenient pedestrian and collection vehicle access.

TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
TS1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a Grading Permit, the permittee must demonstrate compliance with UDC Section 17.51.007 (Connected City Infrastructure Program) requiring conduit from a location to be determined in the public right-of-way to the Minimum Point of Entry (MPOE) or similar location within the project area that serves as the main telecommunications closet. Conduit for this condition must be reflected on development plans.

3.b
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks) ATTACHMENT A: AERIAL AND ZONING MAP
Master Case 24-104: Conditional Use Permit 24-005 and Development Review 24-009 20950 Centre Pointe Parkway
(Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-018-047)

Aerial Map

3.c
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Aerial and Zoning Map (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks) Zoning Map

ZONING KEY
– Public/Institutional
– Business Park

PI
BP
Project Site
PI
BP

3.c
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Aerial and Zoning Map (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks)

SITE, FLOOR, & ELEVATION PLANS
Master Case 24-104: Conditional Use Permit 24-005 and Development Review 24-009 20950
Centre Pointe Parkway
(Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-018-047)

3.d
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Site, Floor, & Elevation Plans (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks) 22 8
7 18
1 16 16
6 15
10 2
8 13
14 PROPOSED FIRE LANE

EXISTING PAVING

AREA TO BE RESTRIPED
7 PL
PL
PL

PLPLPLPLPL
PLPL
PL
PL

EXTEND AS
NEEDED

HOPE CANYON ROAD
HOPE CANYON ROAD1
1 2
2 2
2 2
3 3 34
5 12

PROPOSED FIRE LANE ALONG HOPE CANYON ROAD
11 8

HOPE CANYON ROAD

HOPE CANYON ROAD
22' - 5 3/8" 24' - 11 1/32"

EXISTING RETAINING WALL

EXISTING TEMPORARY RETAINING

WALL TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING CONC.

DRAINAGE SWALE
26' - 0"
2 2
12' - 0"
12' - 0"
6 9
16 60' - 0"
60' - 0"
60' - 0"
60' - 0"
60' - 0"
60' WIDE CLEAR YARD AGREEMENT

LANDSCAPED AREA

PAVED AREA

PROPOSED FIRE LANE
A003
2 LEGEND:

NEW ACCESSIBLE ENTRY DOOR +
30" ABOVE PARKING; FIELD VERIFY
26' - 0"
32' - 11 25/32"
26' - 0"
1 1
1 8
8 8
15 A005
1 Sim
17 EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE 4 - 6

YARD BINS TO BE DEMOLISHED TO

BE COMPLIANT WITH CBC SECTION
506.3.3.1
42' - 6 29/32"
21' - 0"
26' - 0"
R 40' - 0"
A0054
A005 3
A005
2 EXISTING SHED TO BE

DEMOLISHED TO BE COMPLIANT
WITH CBC SECTION 506.3.3.1;

REPLACE WITH DELIVERY SPACES
18 4
19, TYPICAL
20 WATER CONTROL FOR

LAWN WATERING SYSTEM
30' - 2 7/8"
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck truck

PROPOSED PAINTED STRIPES

FINGER SIZE EXPANDED

TO ALLOW FOR TREE GROWTH
27' - 5 3/4"
26' - 1 15/16"
Minimum Heigth of Signage
6' - 8"
11B-502.8 ADDITIONAL SIGNS
AN ADDITIONAL SIGN SHALL BE POSTED EITHER; 1) IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE AT EACH ENTRANCE TO AN OFF- STREET PARKING FACILITY OR 2) IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO ON-SITE ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND VISIBLE FROM EACH PARKING SPACE.
11B-502.8.1 SIZE
THE ADDITIONAL SIGN SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 17 INCHES (432 MM) WIDE BY 22 INCHES (559 MM) HIGH. 11B-502.8.2 - THE ADDITIONAL SIGN SHALL CLEARLY STATE IN LETTERS WITH A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 1 INCH (25 MM) THE FOLLOWING:
"UNAUTHORIZED VEHICLES PARKED IN DESIGNATED ACCESSIBLE SPACES NOT DISPLAYING DISTINGUISHING

PLACARDS OR SPECIAL LICENSE PLATES ISSUED FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES WILL BE TOWED AWAY AT THE OWNER'S EXPENSE. TOWED VEHICLES MAY BE RECLAIMED AT: _________________________ OR BY TELEPHONING _______________________."
BLANK SPACES SHALL BE FILLED IN WITH APPROPRIATE INFORMATION AS A PERMANENT PART OF THE SIGN. 1' - 5" MIN.
1' - 10" MIN.

SIGN TO BE MIN. 17" WIDE
SIGN TO BE MIN. 22" HIGH
LETTERS TO BE MIN, 1" HIGH
18 9
2 8
2 26' - 0"
12 11
5' - 0"
15 7' - 8 23/32"
A004
10 Sim
A004
7 Sim
Scale
Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project Number
Copyright Information:

These documents and images, designs, and other materials of service included in this drawing set are the sole and exclusive property of Grizzly Bear Architecture and Design, Inc., and license to use the Architect's drawings is grangted to the client on a confidential and exclusive basis solely for use in connection with the construction of the project contained herein.

Federal law prohibits the reproduction, display, sale, or other distribution, dispersion, or disposition of this document and its specific use of images and content without the written consent of Grizzly Bear Architecture and Design, Inc.'s President, Charles A. Matthews, as may be seen in the contract between the property owner and the architecture firm. This drawing can not be used for construction unless approved by governmental agencies, a building permit, and the wet signature of the Architect of Record.

Charles A. Matthews,
Architect
License: #C-32567
Grizzly Bear Architecture and Design, Inc.
28043 Smyth Drive, Suite 102
Valencia, CA 91355
1-800-745-6973 | (661) 713-0599
[email protected]
http://GrizzlyBearArchitecture.com
As indicated
7/29/2025 6:49:54 PM
A003

SITE PLAN

MARATHON INDUSTRIES
20950 Centre Pointe Pkwy
Santa Clarita, CA 91350-2975
CAM
CAM
07/21/2025
Project Number

TENANT IMPROVEMENT
Project Status
No. Description Date
1" = 50'-0"1 SITE PLAN
NORTH

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

15. 16.

17. 18.

19. 20.

FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD / ROAD FOR FIRE ACCESS
TWO-WAY DRIVE AISLES, MIN. 26'

ASPHALT SURFACING, ROLLED TO A SMOOTH, HARD SURFACE HAVING A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF

THREE AND ONE-HALF INCHES AFTER COMPACTION, AND LAID OVER A BASE OF CRUSHED ROCK,

GRAVEL OR OTHER SIMILAR MATERIAL COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF FIVE INCHES (UDC SECTION 17.51.060.E.1). GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THESE CONDITIONS.

THERE WILL BE ONLY ONE LOADING DOCK USED. ALL OTHERS WILL NOT BE USED. THIS LOCATION IS THE SEMI-TRUCK DELIVERY SPACE AT 12' X 50' X 14'.

DELIVERY VAN SPACE AT 12' X 20' X 14'.

FINISHED VEHICLE STAGING AREA. 10 TRUCK CAPACITY NEEDED. EACH SPACE REQUIRED MAXIMUM 10'X40'. THESE ARE NOT TYPICAL PARKING SPACES WITH CIRCULATION REQUIREMENTS.

ACCESSIBLE PARKING

EXISTING TREE

BUILDING ENTRANCE

PATH OF TRAVEL TO THE PUBLIC WAY

VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING

DETECTABLE WARNING

PROPOSED SIDEWALK
EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE REMOVED; NO REPLACEMENT AS IT IS UNNEEDED.

SITE ACCESSIBLE WARNING SIGN

NEW RAMP

NEW SIDEWALK TERMINATES

NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE
NEW TREE; SEE LANDSCAPING DESIGN FOR MORE INFORMATION
3' TALL HEADLIGHT HEDGE, TYP.

KEYNOTE LEGEND:

AUTO BODY REPAIR AND PAINTING: 1,153 SF / 400 = 3 PARKING SPACES PROFESSIONAL OFFICES: 4,557 SF / 250 = 18 PARKING SPACES WAREHOUSING: 40,942 SF / 1,000 = 41 PARKING SPACES
MANUFACTURING: 38,318 SF / 500 = 77 PARKING SPACES
TOTAL REQUIRED 139 PARKING SPACES
TOTAL PROVIDED: 144 PARKING SPACES THEREFORE COMPLIES
PARKING CALCULATION:
3/4" = 1'-0"3 SITE ACCESSIBILITY PARKING SIGNAGE
A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

G.

H.

I.

REQUIRED PARKING = 139; PROVIDED = 143
ALL CURRENT STRIPING IN NORTH PARKING AREA TO BE REMOVED.

EXISTING TEMPORARY RETAINING WALL TO BE REMOVED.

NORTH PARKING LOT EXISTING CURBS AT EXISTING PLANTERS TO BE DEMOLISHED

ALL LANDSCAPING TO COMPLY WITH CITY OF SANTA CLARITA STANDARDS / DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS.

ALL LAND USED FOR PARKING MUST BE PAVED WITH CONCRETE SURFACING TO A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF THREE AND ONE-HALF INCHES, WITH EXPANSION JOINTS AS NECESSARY; OR

ASPHALT SURFACING, ROLLED TO A SMOOTH, HARD SURFACE HAVING A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF

THREE AND ONE-HALF INCHES AFTER COMPACTION, AND LAID OVER A BASE OF CRUSHED ROCK,

GRAVEL OR OTHER SIMILAR MATERIAL COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF FIVE INCHES (UDC SECTION 17.51.060.E.1).

TENANT TO REMOVE PARKING SUBSTANCES PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED OVER THE PROPERTY LINE.

FOR NEW PAVING, ESPECIALLY IN THE NORTH PARKING LOT, THE PAVING CONTRACTOR IS TO

REPAIR AND SUPPLEMENT ANY EXISTING NON-PAVED AREAS OR AREAS NOT CONFORMING TO

TYPICAL INDUSTRY-WIDE STANDARDS WITH THOSE MEANS NEEDED IN ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE

PAVED SURFACE TO FUNCTION IN A CONSISTENT AND COHERENT MANNER, INCLUSIVE OF ADDING SUB BASE LAYER(S), BASE LAYER(S) AND ASPHALT IN AN AS-NEEDED MANNER.

PROVIDE SUFFICIENT TRASH ENCLOSURES TO HOUSE AT LEAST EIGHT 3-YARD BINS. FOUR OF THE BINS MUST BE RESERVED FOR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS ONLY. IN ADDITION, ONE 3-YARD BIN PER ENCLOSURE MUST BE ADDED FOR ORGANICS RECYCLING PER SB1383 SITE RELATED BREAKDOWN:
1" = 10'-0"2 ENLARGED ACCESSIBLE PARKING
FOR REVIEW ONLY;

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION

3.d
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Site, Floor, & Elevation Plans (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks) UP
UPUP

A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
1 2
3 4
5 32947 SF
(E) WAREHOUSE
130
398 SF
(E) PRINTING /

REPRODUCTION
114

ELECTRICAL

POWER PANELS
285 SF
(E) LOBBY
100
250 SF
(E) FILE STORAGE
101
406 SF
(E) I.T.
116
279 SF
(E) STORAGE
115
130 SF
(E) OFFICE
102
160 SF
(E) OFFICE
103
144 SF
(E) I.T.
104
97 SF
(E) OFFICE
112
145 SF
(E) OFFICE
105
145 SF
(E) STAFF BREAK
ROOM
106
166 SF
MEN'S

RESTROOM
107
500 SF

HALLWAY
110
84 SF
(E) OFFICE
113
452 SF
(E) LAB
111
1367 SF
(E) WORKSHOP
137
195 SF
(E) MENS

RESTROOM
138
195 SF
(E) WOMENS

RESTROOM
139
929 SF

BREAK ROOM
143

LIFTGATE AND ELECTRICAL

WELDING (FABRICATION)
GROUP 'F-2'
APPROX. 6,380 SF
NORTH
413 SF
(E) COMPRESSOR
ROOM
144
(E) EXTERIOR

SHED FOR PAINT
BOOTHS
122
29' - 6"
4' - 0"
(N) ROLL UP
DOOR: 18' WIDE X
16' HIGH
(E) ROLL UP DOOR
18' - 6"
SPRAY
BOOTH #2

UNDERCOAT SPRAY
BOOTH #1
5' - 0"
5' - 0"
F.E.
1 1 2 2
EXIT
2 2

NEW STAIR

REEFER PRESS JIG
(FABRICATION)

GROUP 'F'
APPROX. 525 SF

CLEAN -

GROUP 'F'
APPROX.
1,926 SF

SERVICE - GROUP 'F'
APPROX. 6,477 SF

PANEL JIGS - GROUP 'F'
APPROX. 329 SF WALL JIG - GROUP 'F'
APPROX. 676 SF

SUBFRAME JIGS -

GROUP 'F'
APPROX. 676 SF

FRAME DOLLY -

GROUP 'F'
APPROX. 76 SF

PORTAL JIG - GROUP 'F'
APPROX. 247 SF

CARTS - GROUP 'F'
APPROX. 115 SF

ALUMINUM SAW -

GROUP 'F'
APPROX. 351 SF

ASSEMBLY LINE -

GROUP 'F'
APPROX. 6,685 SF
2 2 2 2 2
2F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E.

F.E. F.E.F.E.

F.E.

F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E.

F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E.

F.E.

F.E.

F.E.

F.E.

F.E. F.E.
2 F.E. F.E.
3 3
3 CG COMPRESSED GASSES LOCATIONS
LEGEND:

F.E. FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATION

CG CG CG CG CG

CG CGCG CG

STORAGE
51' - 9"
4 200' - 0"
5 6376 SF

LIFTGATE AND

ELECTRICAL

WELDING
120
525 SF

REEFER PRESS
JIG
117

STORAGE
108
19 SF
CLOSET
109
A102
1 A101
1 436' - 7 15/16"
2693 SF
REEFER
119
8138 SF

CLEAN SPECIALS

AND ELECTRICAL
134

UNDERCOAT
SPRAY BOOTH #1
136FRAME DOLLY
135

SUBFRAME JIGS
124

WALL JIG
125

PORTAL JIG
123

ALUMINUM SAW
121
CARTS
132

SERVICE
127CLEAN
128
1667 SF

MOUNTING
131
1 HOUR FIRE RATED WALL
KEYNOTE LEGEND:

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. SIGNAGE: "NO WELDING. THE USE OF WELDING OR CUTTING EQUIPMENT IN OR NEAR THIS AREA IS DANGEROUS BECAUSE OF FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS.

WELDING AND CUTTING SHALL BE DONE ONLY UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE PERSON IN CHARGE"
SIGNAGE: "CAUTION: HOT WORKS IN PROGRESS", TYPICAL

FIRE HOSE
COMPLETE CRANE ASSEMBLY; SEE CRANE DESIGNS AT THE END OF THIS SHEET SET.

HIGH PILE RACK STORAGE; SEE SHEET S1 OF 1, TYP.

PER TABLE 1017.2
B 300' MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE FOR SPRINKLERED BUILDINGS S-2 400' MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE FOR SPRINKLERED BUILDINGS F-1 250' MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE FOR SPRINKLERED BUILDINGS; PER 1017.2.2, 400' MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE: INTERIOR FINISHED FLOOR TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF IS APPROX. 25'-6"
Scale
Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project Number
Copyright Information:

These documents and images, designs, and other materials of service included in this drawing set are the sole and exclusive property of Grizzly Bear Architecture and Design, Inc., and license to use the Architect's drawings is grangted to the client on a confidential and exclusive basis solely for use in connection with the construction of the project contained herein.

Federal law prohibits the reproduction, display, sale, or other distribution, dispersion, or disposition of this document and its specific use of images and content without the written consent of Grizzly Bear Architecture and Design, Inc.'s President, Charles A. Matthews, as may be seen in the contract between the property owner and the architecture firm. This drawing can not be used for construction unless approved by governmental agencies, a building permit, and the wet signature of the Architect of Record.

Charles A. Matthews,
Architect
License: #C-32567
Grizzly Bear Architecture and Design, Inc.
28043 Smyth Drive, Suite 102
Valencia, CA 91355
1-800-745-6973 | (661) 713-0599
[email protected]
http://GrizzlyBearArchitecture.com
NOTE: ALL WORK DEPICTED IN THESE DRAWINGS IS BELIEVED TO BE ACCURATE AT THE TIME OF THE ORIGINAL DRAFTING, DESIGN & SUBMITTAL OF THE WORK. IF CONDITIONS IN

THE FIELD HAVE CHANGED IN THE INTERVENING TIME TO BE OTHER THAN AS DEPICTED IN

THESE DRAWINGS, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CLIENT AND THE GENERAL

CONTRACTOR TO BRING THOSE TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT AND / OR TO THE

BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT OF THE GOVERNING AUTHORITIES SO THAT THE DRAWINGS MAY BE CHANGED IN A TIMELY FASHION. THE ARCHITECT DOES NOT WARRANT

THAT THESE DRAWINGS REFLECT CHANGES UNCOMMUNICATED TO THE ARCHITECT

DURING ANY INTERVENING TIME PERIOD, INCLUDING THAT BETWEEN SITE VISITS, BUILDING AND SAFETY SUBMITTAL OR OTHER RELATED MILESTONE FOR ANY REASON. IF IN THE

PROCESS OF BUILDING AND SAFETY REVIEW AND APPROVAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS

REQUIRED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, IT IS ADDED TO THE DRAWINGS FOR THE PURPOSE

OF CLARIFICATION OF AREAS AND ELEMENTS THAT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL HAS DEEMED

NECESSARY AND DOES NOT REFLECT AN UPDATE IN ALL CONDITIONS AS MAY HAVE BEEN

CHANGED OUTSIDE OF THE ARCHITECT'S KNOWLEDGE AND RESPONSIBLE CONTROL OF THE DESIGNED WORK CONTAINED IN THESE DRAWINGS. IN SUCH A CASE, THE ARCHITECT

IS DEPENDENT UPON THE CLIENT AND THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO MAKE KNOWN TO

HIM SUCH CONDITIONS AS THEY OCCUR IN A TIMELY WAY SO THAT THE ELEMENTS IN

QUESTION CAN BE ASSESSED AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THESE

DRAWINGS MAY BE UPDATED / CHANGED AND APPROVAL CAN BE EITHER GRANTED OR DENIED AT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL'S DISCRETION. THE ARCHITECT AT TIMES MUST RELY

ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO HIM BY THE OWNER AND / OR THE OWNER'S

REPRESENTATIVES AND AGENTS AND COMMUNICATED TO THE ARCHITECT AS BEING TRUE AND CONSISTENT WITH CONDITIONS AS THEY EXIST IN THE FIELD. IT IS THE

RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OR OWNER TO FIELD VERIFY ALL

RELEVANT CONDITIONS AND COMMUNICATE THOSE TO THE ARCHITECT IF THEY SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFER FROM THOSE SHOWN IN THESE PLANS.

As indicated
1/16/2025 8:46:29 AM
A100

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

MARATHON INDUSTRIES
20950 Centre Pointe Pkwy
Santa Clarita, CA 91350
Checker
Author
01/16/2025
0912201601

TENANT IMPROVEMENT
HW
No. Description Date
1" = 20'-0"1 LIFE SAFETY AND EGRESS
Egress Occupancy
No. Name Occupancy
Occupancy
Factor Area # Occupants Comments
100 (E) LOBBY BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 285 SF 1.9
101 (E) FILE STORAGE BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 250 SF 1.7
102 (E) OFFICE BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 130 SF 0.9
103 (E) OFFICE BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 160 SF 1.1
104 (E) I.T. BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 144 SF 1.0
105 (E) OFFICE BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 145 SF 1.0
106 (E) STAFF BREAK ROOM BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 145 SF 1.0 107 MEN'S RESTROOM ACCESSORY 0 SF 166 SF
108 STORAGE BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 68 SF 0.5
109 CLOSET ACCESSORY 0 SF 19 SF
110 HALLWAY ACCESSORY 0 SF 500 SF
111 (E) LAB BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 452 SF 3.0
112 (E) OFFICE BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 97 SF 0.6
113 (E) OFFICE BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 84 SF 0.6
114 (E) PRINTING / REPRODUCTION BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 398 SF 2.7 115 (E) STORAGE WAREHOUSES (S-2) 500 SF 279 SF 0.6
116 (E) I.T. BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 406 SF 2.7
117 REEFER PRESS JIG FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 525 SF 5.2 118 ASSEMBLY LINE FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 6685 SF 66.8 119 REEFER FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 2693 SF 26.9
120 LIFTGATE AND ELECTRICAL WELDING FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 6376 SF 63.8 121 ALUMINUM SAW FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 351 SF 3.5
122 (E) EXTERIOR SHED FOR PAINT BOOTHS FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 2650 SF 26.5 123 PORTAL JIG FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 247 SF 2.5
124 SUBFRAME JIGS FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 668 SF 6.7
125 WALL JIG FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 676 SF 6.8
126 SPRAY BOOTH #2 BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 576 SF 3.8
Egress Occupancy
No. Name Occupancy
Occupancy
Factor Area # Occupants Comments
127 SERVICE FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 6026 SF 60.3
128 CLEAN FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 1926 SF 19.3
130 (E) WAREHOUSE WAREHOUSES (S-2) 500 SF 32947 SF 65.9 131 MOUNTING FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 1667 SF 16.7
132 CARTS FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 115 SF 1.1
133 PANEL JIGS FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 329 SF 3.3
134 CLEAN SPECIALS AND ELECTRICAL FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 8138 SF 81.4 135 FRAME DOLLY FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 75 SF 0.8
136 UNDERCOAT SPRAY BOOTH #1 FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 576 SF 5.8 137 (E) WORKSHOP BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 1367 SF 9.1
138 (E) MENS RESTROOM ACCESSORY 0 SF 195 SF
139 (E) WOMENS RESTROOM ACCESSORY 0 SF 195 SF
143 BREAK ROOM BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 929 SF 6.2
144 (E) COMPRESSOR ROOM FABRICATION (F-1) 100 SF 413 SF 4.1 200 (E) OFFICE BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 204 SF 1.4
201 (E) OFFICE BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 139 SF 0.9
202 OFFICE BUSINESS (B) 150 SF 283 SF 1.9
203 STORAGE WAREHOUSES (S-2) 500 SF 1081 SF 2.2
204 STORAGE WAREHOUSES (S-2) 500 SF 3856 SF 7.7
519.4

3.d
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Site, Floor, & Elevation Plans (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks) DN

A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
1 2
3 4
5 204 SF
(E) OFFICE
200 139 SF
(E) OFFICE
201
283 SF
OFFICE
202
14' - 6"
10' - 0"
15' - 0"
15' - 0"

PROPOSED SPRAY BOOTH, BELOW

PROPOSED SPRAY BOOTH, BELOW
1081 SF

STORAGE
203
3856 SF

STORAGE
204
Scale
Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project Number
Copyright Information:

These documents and images, designs, and other materials of service included in this drawing set are the sole and exclusive property of Grizzly Bear Architecture and Design, Inc., and license to use the Architect's drawings is grangted to the client on a confidential and exclusive basis solely for use in connection with the construction of the project contained herein.

Federal law prohibits the reproduction, display, sale, or other distribution, dispersion, or disposition of this document and its specific use of images and content without the written consent of Grizzly Bear Architecture and Design, Inc.'s President, Charles A. Matthews, as may be seen in the contract between the property owner and the architecture firm. This drawing can not be used for construction unless approved by governmental agencies, a building permit, and the wet signature of the Architect of Record.

Charles A. Matthews,
Architect
License: #C-32567
Grizzly Bear Architecture and Design, Inc.
28043 Smyth Drive, Suite 102
Valencia, CA 91355
1-800-745-6973 | (661) 713-0599
[email protected]
http://GrizzlyBearArchitecture.com
NOTE: ALL WORK DEPICTED IN THESE DRAWINGS IS BELIEVED TO BE ACCURATE AT THE TIME OF THE ORIGINAL DRAFTING, DESIGN & SUBMITTAL OF THE WORK. IF CONDITIONS IN

THE FIELD HAVE CHANGED IN THE INTERVENING TIME TO BE OTHER THAN AS DEPICTED IN

THESE DRAWINGS, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CLIENT AND THE GENERAL

CONTRACTOR TO BRING THOSE TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT AND / OR TO THE

BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT OF THE GOVERNING AUTHORITIES SO THAT THE DRAWINGS MAY BE CHANGED IN A TIMELY FASHION. THE ARCHITECT DOES NOT WARRANT

THAT THESE DRAWINGS REFLECT CHANGES UNCOMMUNICATED TO THE ARCHITECT

DURING ANY INTERVENING TIME PERIOD, INCLUDING THAT BETWEEN SITE VISITS, BUILDING AND SAFETY SUBMITTAL OR OTHER RELATED MILESTONE FOR ANY REASON. IF IN THE

PROCESS OF BUILDING AND SAFETY REVIEW AND APPROVAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS

REQUIRED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, IT IS ADDED TO THE DRAWINGS FOR THE PURPOSE

OF CLARIFICATION OF AREAS AND ELEMENTS THAT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL HAS DEEMED

NECESSARY AND DOES NOT REFLECT AN UPDATE IN ALL CONDITIONS AS MAY HAVE BEEN

CHANGED OUTSIDE OF THE ARCHITECT'S KNOWLEDGE AND RESPONSIBLE CONTROL OF THE DESIGNED WORK CONTAINED IN THESE DRAWINGS. IN SUCH A CASE, THE ARCHITECT

IS DEPENDENT UPON THE CLIENT AND THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO MAKE KNOWN TO

HIM SUCH CONDITIONS AS THEY OCCUR IN A TIMELY WAY SO THAT THE ELEMENTS IN

QUESTION CAN BE ASSESSED AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THESE

DRAWINGS MAY BE UPDATED / CHANGED AND APPROVAL CAN BE EITHER GRANTED OR DENIED AT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL'S DISCRETION. THE ARCHITECT AT TIMES MUST RELY

ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO HIM BY THE OWNER AND / OR THE OWNER'S

REPRESENTATIVES AND AGENTS AND COMMUNICATED TO THE ARCHITECT AS BEING TRUE AND CONSISTENT WITH CONDITIONS AS THEY EXIST IN THE FIELD. IT IS THE

RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OR OWNER TO FIELD VERIFY ALL

RELEVANT CONDITIONS AND COMMUNICATE THOSE TO THE ARCHITECT IF THEY SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFER FROM THOSE SHOWN IN THESE PLANS.
3/64" = 1'-0"
1/16/2025 8:46:31 AM
A110

FLOOR PLAN - MEZZANINE
LEVEL

MARATHON INDUSTRIES
20950 Centre Pointe Pkwy
Santa Clarita, CA 91350
CAM
CAM
01/16/2025
0912201601

TENANT IMPROVEMENT
HW
3/64" = 1'-0"2 MEZZANINE LEVEL

THE BUILDING INSPECTOR MAY INSPECT ALL
AREAS. IF ANY WORK APPEARS TO BE NOT

PERMITTED, THE INSPECTOR MAY REQUIRE

ADDITIONAL BUILDING PERMITS
AUTO BODY REPAIR AND PAINTING: 1,153 SF / 400 = 3 PARKING SPACES PROFESSIONAL OFFICES: 4,557 SF / 250 = 18 PARKING SPACES WAREHOUSING: 40,942 SF / 1,000 = 41 PARKING SPACES
MANUFACTURING: 38,318 SF / 500 = 77 PARKING SPACES
TOTAL 139 PARKING SPACES
No. Description Date

3.d
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Site, Floor, & Elevation Plans (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks) (E) TILT-UP

CONCRETE
PANELS, TYP.

VERIFY IN FIELD
24' - 0"
(E) TILT-UP

CONCRETE
PANELS, TYP.

VERIFY IN FIELD
24' - 0"
(E) ROLL UP
DOOR

PROPOSED ROLL-UP GARAGE

DOOR OPENING - (TO BE

INCREASED IN HEIGHT)
(E) ROLL UP
DOOR
(E) TILT-UP WALL
PANELS, TYP.
(E) SHED
24' - 0" VERIFY IN FIELD

PROPOSED LOCATION

OF NEW SPRAY
BOOTH
(E) ROLL-UP
DOORS, TYP.
(E) TILT-UP

CONCRETE
PANELS, TYP.

VERIFY IN FIELD
27' - 0"

VERIFY IN FIELD
24' - 0"
Scale
Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project Number
Copyright Information:

These documents and images, designs, and other materials of service included in this drawing set are the sole and exclusive property of Grizzly Bear Architecture and Design, Inc., and license to use the Architect's drawings is grangted to the client on a confidential and exclusive basis solely for use in connection with the construction of the project contained herein.

Federal law prohibits the reproduction, display, sale, or other distribution, dispersion, or disposition of this document and its specific use of images and content without the written consent of Grizzly Bear Architecture and Design, Inc.'s President, Charles A. Matthews, as may be seen in the contract between the property owner and the architecture firm. This drawing can not be used for construction unless approved by governmental agencies, a building permit, and the wet signature of the Architect of Record.

Charles A. Matthews,
Architect
License: #C-32567
Grizzly Bear Architecture and Design, Inc.
28043 Smyth Drive, Suite 102
Valencia, CA 91355
1-800-745-6973 | (661) 713-0599
[email protected]
http://GrizzlyBearArchitecture.com
NOTE: ALL WORK DEPICTED IN THESE DRAWINGS IS BELIEVED TO BE ACCURATE AT THE TIME OF THE ORIGINAL DRAFTING, DESIGN & SUBMITTAL OF THE WORK. IF CONDITIONS IN

THE FIELD HAVE CHANGED IN THE INTERVENING TIME TO BE OTHER THAN AS DEPICTED IN

THESE DRAWINGS, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CLIENT AND THE GENERAL

CONTRACTOR TO BRING THOSE TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT AND / OR TO THE

BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT OF THE GOVERNING AUTHORITIES SO THAT THE DRAWINGS MAY BE CHANGED IN A TIMELY FASHION. THE ARCHITECT DOES NOT WARRANT

THAT THESE DRAWINGS REFLECT CHANGES UNCOMMUNICATED TO THE ARCHITECT

DURING ANY INTERVENING TIME PERIOD, INCLUDING THAT BETWEEN SITE VISITS, BUILDING AND SAFETY SUBMITTAL OR OTHER RELATED MILESTONE FOR ANY REASON. IF IN THE

PROCESS OF BUILDING AND SAFETY REVIEW AND APPROVAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS

REQUIRED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, IT IS ADDED TO THE DRAWINGS FOR THE PURPOSE

OF CLARIFICATION OF AREAS AND ELEMENTS THAT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL HAS DEEMED

NECESSARY AND DOES NOT REFLECT AN UPDATE IN ALL CONDITIONS AS MAY HAVE BEEN

CHANGED OUTSIDE OF THE ARCHITECT'S KNOWLEDGE AND RESPONSIBLE CONTROL OF THE DESIGNED WORK CONTAINED IN THESE DRAWINGS. IN SUCH A CASE, THE ARCHITECT

IS DEPENDENT UPON THE CLIENT AND THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO MAKE KNOWN TO

HIM SUCH CONDITIONS AS THEY OCCUR IN A TIMELY WAY SO THAT THE ELEMENTS IN

QUESTION CAN BE ASSESSED AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THESE

DRAWINGS MAY BE UPDATED / CHANGED AND APPROVAL CAN BE EITHER GRANTED OR DENIED AT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL'S DISCRETION. THE ARCHITECT AT TIMES MUST RELY

ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO HIM BY THE OWNER AND / OR THE OWNER'S

REPRESENTATIVES AND AGENTS AND COMMUNICATED TO THE ARCHITECT AS BEING TRUE AND CONSISTENT WITH CONDITIONS AS THEY EXIST IN THE FIELD. IT IS THE

RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OR OWNER TO FIELD VERIFY ALL

RELEVANT CONDITIONS AND COMMUNICATE THOSE TO THE ARCHITECT IF THEY SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFER FROM THOSE SHOWN IN THESE PLANS.

As indicated
7/21/2025 6:19:33 PM
A103

ELEVATIONS

MARATHON INDUSTRIES
20950 Centre Pointe Pkwy
Santa Clarita, CA 91350
CAM
CAM
9/26/2024
0912201601

TENANT IMPROVEMENT
BLD23-02787
1/16" = 1'-0"1 North
1/16" = 1'-0"2 South
1/8" = 1'-0"3 East
1/8" = 1'-0"4 West No. Description Date

3.d
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Site, Floor, & Elevation Plans (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks)

LANDSCAPE PLANS
Master Case 24-104: Conditional Use Permit 24-005 and Development Review 24-009 20950 Centre Pointe Parkway
(Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-018-047)

3.e
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Landscape Plans (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks) MARATHON INDUSTRIES, INC.

HOPE CANYON ROAD

HOPE CANYON ROAD
(N) TRASH
(E) TRASH

NEW LOW WALL TO

BLOCK HEADLIGHTS
ONTO STREET.

PROTECT IN PLACE ALL

EXISTING TREES ALONG
STREET. PRUNE TO
SHAPE.
(EXISTING BUILDING)

PROTECT IN PLACE ALL

EXISTING TREES ALONG
STREET. PRUNE TO
SHAPE.

PROTECT IN PLACE ALL

EXISTING TREES ALONG
STREET. PRUNE TO
SHAPE.
6" CURB

PLANT KEY

SHRUBS TREES
QTY: 8
36" BOX
Qty: 305 Gallon5 Gallon
5 Gallon
5 Gallon
TOTAL TREES: 28TOTAL SHRUBS: 239

GROUNDCOVER
QTY: 10
15 GAL.

QTY: 9
24" BOX
16,977
SQ. FT.

Qty: 12
Qty: 44
Qty: 63
TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA (SQ. FT.): 16,977

STANDARD TREE
Qty: 275 Gallon5 Gallon
Qty: 63
(4) Established trees
in parking lot

OF SHEETS
SHEET
1 APN: 2836-018-047

MARATHON
INDUSTRIES, INC.
20950 CENTRE POINTE PARKWAY
SANTA CLARITA, CA 91350
963-Marathon Ind.
7-22-2025
PMT 25-

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CA #4223, OR #683

SUE MATHISLANDSCAPE
DESIGN
16340 LOWER HARBOR ROAD
SUITE 1 #337
BROOKINGS, OR 97415
MOBILE: (661) 256-4261
EMAIL: [email protected]
7-22-2025
LC
1 CONCEPTUAL

LANDSCAPE
PLAN
LANDSCAPE DESIGN CONCEPTSCALE: 1"=40'-0"
20' 0
FEET
40'80'120'160'

GRAPHIC BAR SCALE

PARKING LOT TREE SHADE
5% SHADE REQUIRED FOR PARKING SPACES.

TOTAL PARKING SPACE AREA = 21,208 SQ'
5% OF 21,208 SQ' = 1,060 SQ' SHADE REQUIRED
TREES SHADE PROVIDED = 5,960 SQ'
FINAL LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS:

ALL WORK SHALL MEET OR EXCEED CITY
LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT.

TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA : 16,977 SQ. FT.

3.e
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Landscape Plans (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks)

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION

TO: FROM:

[X] County Clerk City of Santa Clarita
County of Los Angeles Community Development
12400 E. Imperial Hwy., Rm. 2001 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite #302 Norwalk, CA 90650 Santa Clarita, CA 91355

[ ] Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
DATE: August 19, 2025

PROJECT NAME: Master Case 24-104: Conditional Use Permit 2 4-005 and Development Review 24-009

PROJECT APPLICANT: Chad Hess, Marathon Industries, Inc.

PROJECT LOCATION: 20950 Centre Pointe Parkway (Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-018-047)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit and Development Review to occupy an existing 78,000 square foot industrial warehouse for the operation of an auto bo dy repair and painting use, Marathon Trucks, at the southeast intersection of Centre Pointe Parkway and Golden Valley Road. The project includes the installation of two interior spray booths, along with new landscaping and paving improvements to the parkin g lot areas. The subject property is located in the Business Park zone within the community of Canyon Country.

This is to advise that the [ ] Director of Public Works [X] Planning Commission [ ] City Council of the City of Santa Clarita has approved t he above project on August 19, 2025 . Review of the project by the Department of Community Development found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.

EXEMPT STATUS: California Environmental Quality Act und er Article 19 Section 15301, the project is exempt under Class 1. A Class 1 exemption consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alterations of existing private structures or facilities with no expansion of existing use. This includes the subdivision of existing commercial buildings/properties where no physical changes occur.

Person or agency carrying out the project: City of Santa Clarita, Community Development Department

This is to certify that the Notice of Exemption with comments/respons es and record of project approval is available for public review at:

City of Santa Clarita
Community Development Department
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302
Santa Clarita, California 91355
(661) 255-4330

Contact Person/Title: Emily Rubalcava, Assistant Planner I

Signature:

S:\CD\!PLANNING DIVISION\CURRENT\!2024\MC24-104 (ADR, DR, and CUP for Marathon Trucks)\5. Planning Commission\6. Public Notice (MC24-104).docx

3.f
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Notice of Exemption (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks)

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302
Santa Clarita, CA 91355

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

APPLICATION: Master Case 24-104: Conditional Use Permit 24-005; Development Review 24-009
PROJECT APPLICANT: Chad Hess, Marathon Industries, Inc.

PROJECT LOCATION: 20950 Centre Pointe Parkway (Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-018-047)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit and Development Review to occupy an existing 78,000 square foot industrial warehouse for the operation of an auto body repair and painting use, Marathon Trucks, at the southeast intersection of Centre Pointe Parkway and Golden Valley Road. The project includes the installation of two interior spray booths, along with new landscaping and paving improvements to the parking lot areas. The subject property is located in the Business Park zone within the community of Canyon Country.

The City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on this matter on the following date:

DATE: Tuesday, August 19, 2025
TIME: At or after 6:00 p.m.

LOCATION: City Hall, Council Chambers
23920 Valencia Blvd., First Floor
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Article 19 Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Class 1. A. Class 1 Existing Facilities exemption consists of the operation, permitting, leasing or minor alteration of existing public or private structures.

If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or written correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clarita at, or prior to, the public hearings . If you wish to have written comments included in the materials the Planning Commission receives prior to the public hearing, it must be submitted to the Community Development Department by Friday, August 8, 2025.

For further information regarding this proposal, you may contact the project planner at the City of Santa Clarita, Permit Center, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 140, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Telephone:
(661) 255-4330. Website: www.santaclarita.gov/planning. Send written correspondence to: 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 140, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Project Planner: Emily Rubalcava, Assistant Planner I, [email protected].

Patrick Leclair
Planning Manager

Published: The Signal, July 29, 2025

3.g
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Public Notice (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks)

PROJECT SITE
Request for a new auto body and painting use
20950 Centre Pointe Parkway
(Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-018-047)

Golden Valley Road
N
Project Site
Santa Clarita Sports
Complex

3.g
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Public Notice (MC24-104 Marathon Trucks)

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

PLANNING COMMISSION

Regular Meeting
~ Minutes ~

Tuesday, August 19, 2025 6:00 PM City Council Chambers

CALL TO ORDER
Chair Eichman called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL
Chair Eichman, Commissioner Burkhart, Commissioner Keith, and Commissioner Verner were all present.

FLAG SALUTE
Commissioner Verner led the flag salute.

COMMISSION SECRETARY ANNOUNCEMENT
Rachel Clark gave the Secretary Announcement.

Chair Eichman acknowledged the absence of former Planning Commissioner Denise Lite.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A motion was made by Commissioner Burkhart and seconded by Commissioner Verner to approve the minutes from the June 17, 2025, regular Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried by a 4-0 voice vote.

CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING

ITEM 1
WILEY CANYON MIXED-USE PROJECT (MASTER CASE 20-238)
A request to allow for the development of a mixed-use project consisting of a senior-living facility with 130 independent living units, 61 assisted-living units, and 26 memory care beds; 8,914 square feet of commercial floor area; and 379 multi-family apartment units.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Planning Commission:

1. Receive the staff presentation in response to Planning Commission direction;

2. Open the continued public hearing to receive testimony from the applicant and the public;

3. Provide direction to staff on the hearing schedule; and

4. Continue the public hearing to a date certain.

Page 2 ends

R. Weston Monroe objected to the proceeding of the continued public hearing based on the claim of inadequate on-site public notice.

Erika Iverson, Senior Planner, presented on the item.

The public comment portion of the continued public hearing was opened at 6:24 p.m.

Tom Clark, the applicant, and his team presented on behalf of the item.

There were 15 public speakers, four in support, six in opposition, and five that were neutral or did not disclose their position.

Additionally, there were six written comments in opposition, noting concerns regarding traffic, emergency response, and project design.

The applicant team exercised their right to rebuttal, responding to the public comments.

Commissioner Burkhart asked to clarify the legal public noticing requirements and the risk of proceeding with the public hearing. Assistant City Attorney Karl Berger provided clarification that the City provides reasonable notice to the public, noting the large number of attendees, and that the City was in compliance.

Chair Eichman asked if a public notice was provided in Spanish. Mr. Berger noted that there is no legal requirement to do so. Patrick Leclair, Planning Manager, confirmed that a public notice in Spanish was not provided.

Commissioner Keith asked the applicant team to clarify whether the parking for the park was included in the required parking for the residential and commercial portions of the project. Glenn Adamick, of the applicant team, responded that the parking spaces for the park were counted separately from the rest of the project. Mr. Keith asked about the property lines with the adjacent property to the south, which currently has a parking lot. Mr. Adamick noted that discussions are taking place regarding a potential lot line adjustment.

Chair Eichman asked about the amenities that would be provided at the park. Mr. Adamick stated that it has not been planned at this stage. Chair Eichman also asked if the gap between the Metro wall, along the Interstate-5 freeway, and the Project’s wall has been fixed. Mr. Adamick noted that it has not, but it would be landscaped and include a wrought-iron fence. Chair Eichman asked if the applicant would accept a Condition of Approval requiring the assisted- living facility to submit an emergency disaster plan. The applicant agreed. She also asked about the location of the fire exit. Mr. Adamick responded.

Commissioner Verner asked about the height of the Metro wall and berm wall by the assisted living facility. Mr. Adamick and Ms. Iverson responded.

The public comment portion of the continued public hearing was closed at 7:20 p.m.

Page 3 ends

Chair Eichman noted that she liked the proposed alternative project. Commissioner Burkhart agreed that it is a substantial improvement and commented on the benefit of a locally based developer.

Commissioner Keith asked City Planning staff for confirmation that City staff have reviewed the right-of-way access in response to the potential for the future widening of Wiley Canyon Road.

Ms. Iverson confirmed. Mr. Keith asked if additional Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) would be allowed per State law. Ms. Iverson stated that per the City's ADU Ordinance, no additional ADUs would be allowed and it is in conformance with State law. Commissioner Keith asked about the next steps in the public hearing process. Ms. Iverson noted that if the Planning Commission selected the proposed alternative as the preferred alternative, the Final Environmental Impact Report would be circulated with the preferred alternative and brought back to the Planning Commission for review and approval.

Commissioner Verner asked that the applicant fix the on-site public noticing sign prior to the next public hearing date.

Commissioner Keith asked if public notices could be provided in Spanish for the next hearing.

Mr. Leclair stated that no public notices would be required if the item were continued to a date certain, as proposed.

A motion was made by Commissioner Verner and seconded by Commissioner Burkhart to continue the item to the September 16, 2025, regular meeting, selecting the proposed Alternative 5 be the preferred alternative project, including a Condition of Approval that would require proof of State approval of the assisted living facility before building occupancy, and the aforementioned Condition of Approval. Said motion was carried by a roll-call vote of 4-0.

RESULT: APPROVED AS AMENDED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Pamela Verner, Commissioner
SECONDER: Timothy Burkhart, Chair
AYES: Eichman, Burkhart, Keith, Verner

PUBLIC HEARINGS

ITEM 2
RUETHER SELF-STORAGE FACILITY (MASTER CASE 25-048)
A request for approval of Conditional Use Permit 25-004 and Development Review 25-006, to allow the conversion of an existing one-story industrial building into a three-story, self-storage facility and to permit its operation, all within an existing shell building located on Ruether Avenue.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Planning Commission:

1. Receive staff’s presentation;

Page 4 ends

2. Open the public hearing to receive testimonial and written evidence;

3. After closing the public hearing, determine that Master Case 25-048 is categorically exempt from additional environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption;

4. Adopt Resolution No. P25-08, approving Master Case 25-048, including Conditional Use Permit 25-004 and Development Review 25-006, to allow the conversion of an existing one-story industrial building into a three-story self-storage facility and to permit its operation, all within an existing shell building located at 26477 Ruether Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 2836-017-030), subject to Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A); and

5. Take other action as determined by the Planning Commission.

Marlene Mancia, Assistant Planner II, presented on the item.

There were no public speakers on the item.

Commissioner Burkhart asked to clarify the need for a Conditional Use Permit if the height of the building would not change. Ms. Mancia responded.

The public comment portion of the public hearing was opened and closed at 7:37 p.m.

A motion was made by Commissioner Burkhart and seconded by Commissioner Keith, determining that Master Case 25-048 is categorically exempt from additional environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption and adopting Resolution No. P25-08, approving Master Case 25- 048, including Conditional Use Permit 25-004 and Development Review 25-006, to allow the conversion of an existing one-story industrial building into a three-story self-storage facility and to permit its operation, all within an existing shell building located at 26477 Ruether Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 2836-017-030), subject to Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). Said motion was carried by a roll-call vote of 4-0.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Timothy Burkhart, Chair
SECONDER: Nathan Keith, Commissioner
AYES: Eichman, Burkhart, Keith, Verner

Page 5 ends

ITEM 3
MARATHON TRUCKS (MASTER CASE 24-104)
A request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Development Review (DR) to retroactively permit the operation of an auto body repair and painting use, Marathon Trucks, in an existing industrial building at the southeast intersection of Centre Pointe Parkway and Golden Valley Road.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Planning Commission:

1. Conduct the public hearing;

2. Determine that the project is exempt from additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code of Regs. § 15000, et seq.) Section 15301 as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption;

3. Adopt Resolution P25-10 approving Master Case 24-104 (Conditional Use Permit 24-005 and Development Review 24-009) to retroactively permit the operation of an auto body repair and painting use, Marathon Trucks, in an existing industrial building at the southeast intersection of Centre Pointe Parkway and Golden Valley Road (Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-018-047), subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A); and

4. Take other action as determined by the Planning Commission.

Emily Rubalcava, Assistant Planner I, presented on the item.

There were no public speakers on the item.

The public comment portion of the public hearing was opened and closed at 7:43 p.m.

A motion was made by Commissioner Keith and seconded by Commissioner Burkhart, determining that the project is exempt from additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code of Regs. § 15000, et seq.) Section 15301 as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption and adopting Resolution P25- 10 approving Master Case 24-104 (Conditional Use Permit 24-005 and Development Review 24- 009) to retroactively permit the operation of an auto body repair and painting use, Marathon Trucks, in an existing industrial building at the southeast intersection of Centre Pointe Parkway and Golden Valley Road (Assessor’s Parcel Number 2836-018-047), subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). Said motion was carried by a roll-call vote of 4-0.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Nathan Keith, Commissioner
SECONDER: Timothy Burkhart, Chair
AYES: Eichman, Burkhart, Keith, Verner

PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
Patrick Leclair gave a forecast of the upcoming Planning Commission meetings.

Page 6 ends

PLANNING COMMISSIONERS' REPORT
There were no reports made by the Planning Commission.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
There were two speaker cards submitted for Public Participation, but they were not present at the time that they were called.

ADJOURNMENT
A motion was made by Commissioner Burkhart and seconded by Commissioner Verner to adjourn the meeting at 7:45 p.m.

______________________________________
ATTEST: PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIR

______________________________________

PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY

← All documents from this meeting