Agenda packet, joint meeting — Santa Clarita City Council, May 12, 2026

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING

Tuesday, May 12, 2026
6:00 PM
City Council Chambers
23920 Valencia Blvd.

Santa Clarita, CA 91355

AGENDA

Joint Meeting with
Board of Library Trustees

How to Address the City Council
Pursuant to Government Code section 54954.3 members of the public are afforded the opportunities to address the City Council. You may address the Council once per meeting during Public Participation on any matter within the Council's jurisdiction that is not listed on the agenda. Public Participation speaker's cards must be submitted to the City Clerk BEFORE this portion of the meeting begins. To address the Council regarding an item on the agenda, please fill out a speaker's card and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor announces the item.

Each person addressing the Council is given three minutes to speak (with double the time allotted to non-English speakers using a translator) indicated by a colored light system on the Council dais. If you wish to provide information to the Council, please present the City Clerk with 10 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record. Please note use of City Council Chamber technology equipment to present electronic material during meetings is not allowed.
______________________________________________________________________________

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office, (661) 255-4391. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II)

Pursuant to Government Code 54957.5 any writings or documents distributed to a majority of the members of the City Council regarding any open session item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 120, during normal business hours. View public meeting agendas here, inclusive of all attachments and reading file material.
______________________________________________________________________________

Page 2 ends

INVOCATION
Ayala

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

FLAG SALUTE

EXECUTIVE MEETING
This time has been set aside for Councilmembers to review the agenda and obtain any further information that may be needed. Council will also discuss each individual item during the course of the meeting with the exception of the Consent Calendar, which may be approved in its entirety by one motion, unless there is a request to pull an item for discussion. No action will be taken on public agenda items during the Executive Meeting.

AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS
Youth In Government Recognition
Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month Proclamation Mental Health Awareness Month Proclamation

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
This time has been set aside for the public to address the City Council on items NOT listed on the agenda. The City Council will not act upon these items at this meeting other than to review and/or provide direction to staff. All speakers must submit a speaker’s card to the City Clerk PRIOR to the beginning of this portion of the meeting. Thirty minutes are allotted for public input at this time. The FIRST TEN people to submit a speaker card prior to the beginning of Public Participation will be heard.

STAFF COMMENTS

COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS

PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. 2026-27 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE 2024-25 AND 2025-26 ANNUAL ACTION PLANS - Public Hearing regarding the approval of the 2026-27 Annual Action Plan and Substantial Amendment to the 2024-25 and 2025-26 Annual Action Plans for the Community Development Block Grant and Home Investment Partnerships Act Program.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council approve the 2026-27 Annual Action Plan and Substantial Amendment to the 2024-25 and 2025-26 Annual Action Plans for the Community Development Block Grant

Page 3 ends

and Home Investment Partnerships Act Programs.

NEW BUSINESS

2. MEASURE ER: THE ESSENTIAL SERVICES RESTORATION ACT FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY - The Essential Services Restoration Act for Los Angeles County (Measure ER) is a one-half percent (0.5%) general sales tax that will appear on the June 2, 2026, ballot.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council discuss and provide direction to staff.

3. SANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOURTH OF JULY PARADE - This item considers the transfer of responsibility for administering the Santa Clarita Valley Fourth of July Parade to the City of Santa Clarita. This item also authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute an agreement with SCVTV whereby SCVTV retains responsibility to determine the line-up order, designate the grant and division marshals, develop the script for the television broadcast, and administer the judging process.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. Approve the transfer of ownership and responsibility for administering the Santa Clarita Valley Fourth of July Parade from SCVTV to the City of Santa Clarita, effective with the 2026 Parade and continuing thereafter.

2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to enter into an agreement with SCVTV whereby SCVTV retains responsibility to determine the line-up order, designate the grand and division marshals, develop the script for the television broadcast, and administer the judging process, at no cost to the City.

CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council. The items are not individually discussed by the City Council unless a request is made by a member of the public or the Council, in which case, the item(s) will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately.

4. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES – The minutes of the City Council are submitted for approval.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council approve the minutes of the April 28, 2026 Special Meeting.

5. APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES – The minutes of the City Council are submitted for approval.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council approve the minutes of the April 28, 2026 Regular Meeting.

Page 4 ends

6. CHECK REGISTER NO. 10 - Check Register No. 10 for Period 04/03/26 through 04/16/26 and 04/23/26. Electronic Funds Transfers for the Period 04/06/26 through 04/17/26.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council approve and ratify for payment the demands presented in Check Register No. 10.

7. STATE LEGISLATION: ASSEMBLY BILL 748 AND ASSEMBLY BILL 1621 - The following state legislative items were presented to the City Council Legislative Committee on April 28, 2026, and are being presented to the City Council for consideration to adopt a position: AB 748 (Harbedian) and AB 1621 (Wilson).

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Oppose AB 748 (Harabedian), and AB 1621 (Wilson).

2. Transmit position statements to the authors of the bills, Santa Clarita’s state legislative delegation, appropriate legislative committees, Governor Newsom, and other stakeholder organizations.

8. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AFFORDABLE HOUSING SOLUTIONS AGENCY FOR SUPPORT OF SECTOR REPRESENTATIVE - This item considers approval of a Memorandum of Understanding with the Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency to enable the City of Santa Clarita to receive and utilize sector representative support funds.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Authorize City Manager or designee to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with the Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency for the use of sector representative support funds, subject to approval of any further minor modifications by the City Manager and City Attorney.

2. Appropriate grant funding from Measure A LACAHSA Sector Support to Miscellaneous Revenue Account 277-462101 in the amount of $75,000 and appropriate the same amount to Expenditure Account 2773209-500201 for Fiscal Year 2025-26, $155,000 for Fiscal Year 2026-27, and $160,000 to Fiscal Year 2027-

28. 9. GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - NOVEMBER 3, 2026 - The City of Santa Clarita will hold its General Municipal Election on November 3, 2026, to elect three members of the City Council for four-year terms: one seat in District 2, one seat in District 4, and one seat in District 5.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

Page 5 ends

1. Adopt a resolution calling and giving notice of the General Municipal Election to be held November 3, 2026, and requesting consolidation with Los Angeles County’s General Election.

2. Adopt a resolution for candidate statement regulations.

3. Authorize the City Manager to reimburse Los Angeles County for costs of services performed.

10. RECREATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACT - City Council consideration to award a new contract to CivicPlus, LLC to continue using the CivicRec Recreation Management System to provide reliable online customer registration service, leverage existing user data and configurations, and ensure continuity of recreational programming.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Approve the use of a cooperative agreement through The Interlocal Purchasing System (TIPS) Contract #220105.

2. Award a three-year contract to CivicPlus, LLC for the use of its CivicRec Recreation Management System in the amount of $157,193; authorize a contingency in the amount of $15,719 for additional Point of Sale devices and related service costs; and approve credit card processing fees in the amount of $640,991 based on estimated transaction revenue increasing ten percent each fiscal year, for a total amount not to exceed $813,903.

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute up to two additional one-year renewal options beginning in year four, each not to exceed the annual contract amount, inclusive of contingency and credit card processing fees, and contingent upon the appropriation of funds by the City Council in the annual budget for such fiscal year.

4. Authorize a net decrease in appropriations within the General Fund (Fund 100), consisting of a decrease of $155,151 from Expenditure Account 1002200-516101 in Fiscal Year 2026-27 and a corresponding increase of $7,753 to Expenditure Account 1002102-516132; beginning in Fiscal Year 2027-28, increase the ongoing base budget in Expenditure Account 1002200-516101 by five percent annually for the Recreation Management System and increase the ongoing base budget in Expenditure Account 1002102-516132 by ten percent annually for credit card processing fees, contingent upon the appropriation of funds in the annual budget for such fiscal years, as detailed in Exhibit A.

5. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney review.

Page 6 ends

11. VALENCIA HERITAGE PARK TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURT
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT P1021-PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - This item considers awarding a construction contract for the Valencia Heritage Park Tennis/Pickleball Court Improvements project.

Improvements include resurfacing the three existing tennis courts and construction of an additional tennis court with pickleball overlay.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Valencia Heritage Park Tennis/Pickleball Court Improvement Project P1021.

2. Award a construction contract to R.C. Becker, Inc., for the Valencia Heritage Tennis/Pickleball Court Improvement Project P1021 in the amount of $637,853 and authorize a contingency of $63,786, for a total contract amount not to exceed $701,639.

3. Award a professional services contract to Hirsch & Associates, Inc., to provide construction support services in the amount of $15,510 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $1,550, for a total contract amount not to exceed $17,060.

4. Authorize the transfer of project savings in the amount of $134,865 from the General Fund Capital Projects (Fund 601) in the North Oaks Sewer Replacement Project P3038, expenditure account P3038601-516101, to the Valencia Heritage Tennis/Pickleball Court Improvements Project P1021, expenditure account P1021601-516101.

5. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney review.

6. Find the Valencia Heritage Park Tennis/Pickleball Court Improvement Project P1021 exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Article 19, Section 15301 and 15303.

12. LEASE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT WITH SANTA CLARITA STUDIOS CORPORATION - Lease Agreement Amendment with Santa Clarita Studios Corporation for the purpose of parking.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Authorize an amendment to the existing lease agreement with Santa Clarita Studios Corporation to provide a three-month rent deduction during the first year of the five- year renewal term.

2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated

Page 7 ends

documents, subject to City Attorney review.

13. CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH DRILTEK, INC. - This item considers amending the current contract for the Needham Ranch Open Space Oil Wells Plugging and Abandonment Project.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Authorize an amendment to the existing contract with Driltek, Inc., for the plugging and abandonment of six oil wells at Needham Ranch Open Space, increasing expenditure authority in the amount of $98,000 for a total contract amount not to exceed $1,893,690.

2. Authorize the transfer of project savings in the amount of $98,000 from the North Oaks Park Sewer Project P3038 (Fund 601), expenditure account P3038601-516101, to the Needham Ranch Oil Wells Plug and Abandonment Project P2025, expenditure account P2025601-516101.

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney review.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
This time has been set aside for any speakers that have turned in speaker cards and were not heard in the first thirty minutes allotted to address the City Council on items that are NOT on the agenda. Speaker cards may not be submitted relating to any items listed on the agenda.

STAFF COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

FUTURE MEETINGS
The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held May 26, 2026, at 6:00 PM in the Council Chambers, 1st floor of City Hall, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Santa Clarita, CA.

CERTIFICATION
On May 7, 2026, I, Melody Bartlette, do hereby certify that I am the duly appointed and qualified City Clerk for the City of Santa Clarita and that the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall.

_____________________________
Melody Bartlette
Santa Clarita, California

PROCLAMATION
Asian American and Pacific Islander
Heritage Month

May 2026
WHEREAS, Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month is observed during the month of May to celebrate and acknowledge Asian American and Pacific Islander history, culture, and achievements; and

WHEREAS, the month of May was chosen for Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month to commemorate the
immigration of the first Japanese people to the United States on May 7, 1843; and

WHEREAS, May also marks the completion of the
Transcontinental Railroad in 1869, constructed by the labor of mostly Chinese immigrants; and

WHEREAS, today more than 20 million Asian American and
Pacific Islanders live in the United States and through their actions, make America a more vibrant, prosperous, and secure nation; and

WHEREAS, generations of AAPIs of all backgrounds have been inspirational examples of leaders and trailblazers and have a longstanding history of making esteemed, significant, cultural, economic, and community contributions across the United States; and

NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Clarita does hereby
proclaim May 2026, as Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month.

Signed this 12th day of May, 2026.

Laurene Weste, Mayor
Santa Clarita, California
a
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month Proclamation 2026(Letter Size) (Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage

PROCLAMATION

Mental Health Awareness
Month

May 2026

WHEREAS, mental health is essential to the overall well-being of individuals, families, and communities, and it is crucial to recognize the importance of early intervention, access to care, and reducing stigma associated with mental health challenges; and

WHEREAS, Mental Health Awareness Month serves as a vital opportunity to educate the public, encourage open conversations, and advocate for continued support and resources for mental health services; and

WHEREAS, the mental health and well-being of our children, youth, and families is directly tied to the strength and resilience of our community, and investing in accessible, high-quality mental health care leads to safer schools, stronger families, and a healthier Santa Clarita Valley; and

WHEREAS, the Child & Family Center has been the cornerstone of the Santa Clarita Valley since 1976, providing comprehensive mental health services, crisis intervention, and supportive resources to children, youth, and families facing emotional and behavioral health challenges; and

WHEREAS, the Child & Family Center is committed to breaking down barriers to mental health care, fostering hope, and ensuring that no one in our community has to struggle alone.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Clarita does hereby
proclaim May 2026, as Mental Health Awareness Month.

Signed this 12th day of May, 2026.

Laurene Weste, Mayor
Santa Clarita, California
a
Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: Mental Health Awareness Month Proclamation 2026 (Letter Size) (Mental Health Awareness Month Proclamation)

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 1

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: 2026-27 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND SUBSTANTIAL
AMENDMENT TO THE 2024-25 AND 2025-26 ANNUAL ACTION
PLANS
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
PRESENTER: Tracy Sullivan

RECOMMENDED ACTION

City Council approve the 2026-27 Annual Action Plan and Substantial Amendment to the 2024- 25 and 2025-26 Annual Action Plans for the Community Development Block Grant and Home Investment Partnerships Act Programs.

BACKGROUND

Since 1992, the City of Santa Clarita (City) has received an annual allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Entitlement funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). These funds are intended to benefit low- to moderate-income individuals and families through programs that support housing, public services, and community improvements. The City also participates in the Home Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) Program and receives an annual allocation to support affordable housing development.

Each year, the City develops an Annual Action Plan (AAP) that outlines how CDBG and HOME funds will be used. The AAP is guided by the City’s Consolidated Plan (Con Plan), which identifies local priorities and is updated every five years. The current Con Plan, approved by the City Council in May 2024, covers the period of July 2024 through June 2029 and prioritizes the following areas: affordable housing, improvements to public infrastructure in low-income areas, services addressing homelessness and prevention, supportive human services, impacts of COVID-19 on lower-income residents, and program administration.

For Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27, the City has been allocated $1,418,917 in CDBG Entitlement funds and $472,514 in HOME Entitlement funds. Additionally, the City is requesting to amend its 2024-25 and 2025-26 Annual Action Plans to modify its intended use of $1,444,430 in CDBG Entitlement funds through a Substantial Amendment. The City’s plans for a Substantial 1 Packet Pg. 10

Page 2 ends

Amendment are detailed at the end of this report.

Community Needs and Application Process

To ensure the AAP reflects current community needs, the City conducted its annual Community Needs Assessment (CNA) from September to November 2025. Outreach included online surveys, in-person engagement at community events, and distribution of informational fliers at public facilities. A total of 314 residents participated, and the results were provided to the City Council in February 2026, as part of a public hearing.

In conjunction with the CNA, the City issued a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) in November 2025, inviting nonprofit organizations to apply for funding for FY 2026-27. Over 200 organizations were notified of the opportunity. A total of 20 organizations submitted applications for 25 public service programs, requesting a combined total of $1,377,986 in CDBG funding. A panel of City staff evaluated all applications based on eligibility, alignment with Con Plan priorities, and community impact.

Per HUD requirements, no more than 15 percent of the annual CDBG allocation may be used for public service programs. For FY 2026-27, this equates to $212,837 available for public services.

Additionally, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in FY 2020-21, the City received a one- time CDBG-CV allocation to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the pandemic. Since receiving its CDBG-CV allocation, the City has funded qualifying programs which have supported a variety of successful public service programs helping low-income residents recover from the impacts of the pandemic. To qualify for CDBG-CV, programs must directly address pandemic- related needs, such as rental assistance, learning loss, and household support. The City has $807,172 in remaining CDBG-CV funds which are set to expire in September 2027.

X
Recommended Programs and Use of Funds

Based on the evaluation of applications and estimated funding levels, staff is recommending 19 programs for funding. Seven programs are recommended for funding through the City’s Fiscal Year 2026-27 CDBG allocation, while the remaining twelve are recommended to be funded using CDBG-CV funds.

The recommended programs support a range of services, including mental health support for single-parent households, employment training for youth with disabilities, services for individuals experiencing homelessness, and senior outreach. These services are expected to benefit primarily low-income individuals throughout the City.

In accordance with HUD requirements, a minimum of 65 percent of the City’s CDBG funds must be allocated to capital improvement activities. Staff recommends using this allocation in addition to the total funds available through the Substantial Amendment to fund Creekview Park Improvements, which serves low-and moderate-income residents in the surrounding area. Staff also recommends continued support for the Handyworker Program administered by the Santa Clarita Valley Senior Center, which provides minor home repairs and accessibility improvements for low-income residents.

1 Packet Pg. 11

Page 3 ends

The City’s HOME allocation of $472,514 will be committed to a future affordable housing development, consistent with the priorities identified in the Con Plan and HUD requirements.

Substantial Amendment to the 2024-25 and 2025-26 Annual Action Plans

Through the City’s 2024-25 and 2025-26 CDBG Annual Action Plans, a total of $1,448,452 has been allocated toward Playground and Facility Improvements at the Newhall Community Center.

However, the project was deemed ineligible in 2025 after initiating an Environmental Review and consultation with HUD.

After necessary costs to perform a professional Environmental Review, the City has a total of $1,444,430 in funds applicable for use of funding toward an eligible capital project. In order to allocate the available funds toward another project, a Substantial Amendment is needed. A Substantial Amendment modifies the previously approved Annual Action Plans for the program year in which the project was originally approved to include any additional funding. Effectively, the 2024-25 and 2025-26 Annual Action Plans are being amended as part of the City Council action to include additional funding for the Creekview Park Improvement project.

Annual Action Plan and Public Comment

All proposed funding allocations are detailed in the attached 2026-27 Funding Recommendations document. As required by HUD, information regarding the proposed funding was available for public review and comment for a 30-day period ending May 8, 2026. All proposed activities will be subject to a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental review prior to funding approval. The 2026-27 AAP can be found in the City Clerk’s Reading File.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION

Other action as determined by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT

The funding to support the recommended action is provided by the Department of Housing and Urban Develoment (HUD), has no impact on the General Fund, and will be appropriated as part of the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Budget.

ATTACHMENTS
2026-27 City of Santa Clarita Community Block Grant Public Hearing Notice 2026-2027 Funding Recommendations
2026-27 Not Recommended for CDBG Funding
2026-2027 Annual Action Plan (available in City Clerk's Reading File) 1 Packet Pg. 12

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT DRAFT 2026-2027 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND DRAFT SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 ANNUAL

ACTION PLANS

City of Santa Clarita – City Council Meeting

Notice is hereby given that the City of Santa Clarita (City) will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, May 12, 2026, at or after 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers at Santa Clarita City Hall, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, California, 91355.

The purpose of this public hearing is to solicit public comment on the draft Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-2027 Community Development Annual Action Plan (Plan) and a draft Substantial Amendment (SA) to the FY 2024- 2025 Plan and FY 2025- 2026 Plan. The Plan and SA are financial and progr ammatic documents that provide information on the number, type, and funding of program s and activities to be undertaken with federal CDBG and HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) funds received from the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development ( HUD). The City encourages citizens to participate.

In FY 2026- 2027, t he City anticipates receiving an allocation of approximately $1.4 million in CDBG Entitlement funds and $530,000 in HOME funds . The draft SA to the FY 2024-2025 and FY 2025-2026 Plans identifies a total of $1,444,430 in CDBG Entitlement funds to be reallocated to a future capital project in FY 2026-2027.

The City invites public comment regarding the draft documents during the thirty (30) day public comment period beginning April 9, 2026, and ending May 8, 2026. Copies of the draft AAP are available for review on the City’s website at https://santaclarita.gov/, and available in print, upon re quest, during normal business hours at the City Clerk’s Office, Santa Clarita City Hall, 23920 Valencia Blvd, Suite 120, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. The public may submit comments in the following ways: in person, by email to Administrative Analyst Julia Rodriguez at [email protected], or by U.S. Mail to Julia Rodriguez, City of Santa Clarita, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, CA 91355 no later than May 8, 2026, by 5:00 p.m., or at the public hearing on May 12, 2026.

Copies of the City Council meeting agendas will be available 72 hours prior to the meeting date at the City Clerk’s Office , or online at https://santaclarita.gov/. For additional information, please contact Administrative Analyst Julia Rodriguez at 661.286.4174, or by email at [email protected].

If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council, at or prior to, the public hearing.

Para los que hablan español, si usted tiene preguntas o desea más información sobre este producto, por favor póngase en contacto con Julia Rodriguez al 661.286.4174 o por correo electrónico a [email protected]. Gracias.

1.a
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: 2026-27 City of Santa Clarita Community Block Grant Public Hearing Notice (2026-27 CDBG Annual Action Plan and Substantial

Dated: March 17, 2026

Mary Cusick, MMC
City Clerk

Published: The Signal – Wednesday, March 25, 2026

1.a
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: 2026-27 City of Santa Clarita Community Block Grant Public Hearing Notice (2026-27 CDBG Annual Action Plan and Substantial Agency Activity
1 City of Santa Clarita Personnel and O&M $258,783 $30,000 2 Housing Rights Center Fair Housing Services $25,000
Administration Subtotal $283,783 $30,000
3 Child & Family Center Domestic Violence Shelter $39,666 4 Senior Center Community Access Services $39,250
5 Family Promise Low/Mod Income Household Support $39,046 6 Single Mothers Outreach Moving to Thrive $39,046
7 Action Parent and Teen Program At Risk Youth and Family Impact Project $30,586 8 Carousel Ranch Ready to Work $13,208
9 Carousel Ranch Project SCV $12,036
10 Bridge to Home Homeless Intake Specialist $59,920
11 Fostering Youth Independence Case Management $50,200 12 Salvation Army Rent and Utility Assistance $50,000
13 YMCA Childcare Scholarships $42,000
14 Single Mothers Outreach Hope to Home $40,000
15 Family Promise Low/Mod Income Household Support $40,000 16 Finally Family Homes Oasis Resource Center $30,000
17 Avenues Supported Living Services Transportation Services $30,000 18 YMCA Youth & Government $28,000
19 Fostering Youth Independence The Study Place $27,492 20 Boys and Girls Club Scholarship Program $26,500
21 R.M. Pyles Camp Camp and Mentorship Program $3,500
Public Services Subtotal $212,837 $427,612
22 Senior Center Handyworker Program $450,000
23 City of Santa Clarita Creekview Park Improvements $472,297 $240,533 24 City of Santa Clarita Affordable Housing $472,514
Capital Subtotal $922,297 $240,533 $472,514
GRAND TOTAL ALLOCATED $1,418,917 $240,533 $457,612 $472,514 CDBG-CV Funds
2026-27 AAP
HOME Funds
2026-27 AAP
2026-27 Entitlement
Funds Prior Year Savings 2026-27 Recommended 2026-27 Funds

ADMINISTRATION

PUBLIC SERVICES

CAPITAL
FY 2026-27 Annual Action Plan Recommendations
CDBG Funds
2026-27 AAP

1.b
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: 2026-2027 Funding Recommendations (2026-27 CDBG Annual Action Plan and Substantial Applicant Proposed Program Requested
1 NAACP
Youth Civic Education and Literacy Scholarship
Program 14,000
2 God's Glorious Praise Ministries Low/Mod Income People Affected by COVID 500,000 3 Greater Los Angeles Agency on Deafness, Inc. SCV Deaf Equity and Access Facilitation (SCV DEAF) 107,150
4 Santa Clarita Music and Dance Collaborative Innovation Show Choir 25,000 Total 646,150
Not Recommended for 2026-2027 CDBG and CDBG-CV Funding

1.c
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: 2026-27 Not Recommended for CDBG Funding (2026-27 CDBG Annual Action Plan and Substantial Amendment)

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 2

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

NEW BUSINESS
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: MEASURE ER: THE ESSENTIAL SERVICES RESTORATION ACT

FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office
PRESENTER: Masis Hagobian

RECOMMENDED ACTION

City Council discuss and provide direction to staff.

BACKGROUND
The Essential Services Restoration Act for Los Angeles County (Measure ER) is a one-half percent (0.5%) general sales tax that was placed on the June 2, 2026, ballot by the Los Angeles County (County) Board of Supervisors. The motion to place the measure on the ballot was introduced by Supervisors Holly Mitchell and Hilda Solis and was approved (4-1), with Supervisor Kathryn Barger voting no. If approved by a simple majority of County voters, Measure ER would go into effect on October 1, 2026, and sunset on October 1, 2031.

Measure ER was presented to the City Council Legislative Committee on April 28, 2026. The City Council Legislative Committee expressed concerns related to the proposed increase to the sales tax rate and potential impacts to overall affordability throughout the County.

As described in the motion, the intent of the measure is to support County healthcare services that have recently lost federal funding as a result of the passage of House Resolution 1 (2025) (H.R. 1), also known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.”

The County projects a revenue loss of approximately $2.4 billion over the next three years due to a cumulative fiscal impact of federal laws and policies imposed since January 2025, including H.R. 1, Executive Orders on grant oversight, and new federal terms and conditions restrictions.

The County Department of Health Services is projecting federal revenue loss exceeding $700 million per year by 2028-29 as a result of the federal impact of H.R. 1. Additionally, the County Department of Public Health is forecasting a $42 million deficit in fiscal year 2025-26 and anticipates losing $200-300 million in the next three years due to H.R. 1. 2 Packet Pg. 17

Page 2 ends

This measure establishes a nine-member citizens oversight committee and requires an independent auditor to prepare a report for each year until all funds are expended. The County anticipates the measure to generate $1 billion, annually.

The current sales tax in the City of Santa Clarita (City) is 9.75 percent. If this measure were to pass, the City’s sales tax would become 10.25 percent. A higher sales tax rate, especially in comparison to neighboring cities in other counties with a significantly lower sales tax rate, may create a competitive disadvantage for Santa Clarita businesses. Currently, the City of Fillmore has a sales tax rate of 7.25 percent and the sales tax rate in the City of Bakersfield is 8.25 percent.

Supporters:

Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County
SEIU 721 and 2015
St. John’s Community Health
Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project LA County
Health Justice Action Fund

Opponents:

California Contract Cities Association
City of Palmdale
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Los Angeles County Taxpayers Association

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no fiscal impact as a result of this item.

ATTACHMENTS
Measure ER - Resolution Text
2 Packet Pg. 18
HOA.105763538.16

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF

LOS ANGELES PROVIDING FOR AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION ON A

GENERAL COUNTYWIDE TRANSACTIONS AND USE (SALES) TAX MEASURE TO BE HELD IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ON JUNE 2, 2026, AND

CONSOLIDATING THE SPECIAL ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE PRIMARY ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JUNE 2, 2026

WHEREAS, the County of Los Angeles (County) relies on federal funding to support the delivery of vital services to the public, including health care, food assistance, social services, public health programs, child welfare services, housing, public safety, and other services critical for the health and safety of the public.

WHEREAS, 3.3 million County residents (one in three) rely on Medi-Cal for healthcare coverage and almost 1.5 million County residents rely on the Supplemental Nutrition and Assistance Program (SNAP) (called CalFresh in California) for nutritional needs.

WHEREAS, on July 4, 2025, H.R. 1, also known as the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," was signed into federal law. This law imposes, among other cuts to public services, extensive reductions in federal support for Medicaid and SNAP and may cause hundreds of thousands of County residents who rely on Medi-Cal to lose coverage and face reduced access to care. It could result in overcrowding of emergency rooms when residents are unable to get any health care until they are experiencing a life-threatening crisis.

WHEREAS, the cumulative fiscal impact of federal laws and policies imposed since January 20, 2025, including H.R. 1, Executive Orders on grant oversight, and new federal terms and conditions restrictions, has led the County's most impacted departments to project revenue losses totaling $2.4 billion over the next three years, which may result in hiring freezes, service reductions, potential layoffs of 5,000 staff, and facility closures in the coming years.

WHEREAS, federal funding cuts could affect public health services like chronic disease prevention, disease tracking, and water safety, as well as the health care provided at the County's four public hospitals, numerous clinics, partner non-profit safety net hospitals and community health centers, and these cuts will disproportionately affect low-income families and target health care and public health providers.

WHEREAS, proposed reductions at both the federal and State levels are expected to significantly affect Medicaid (Medi-Cal), which is a primary revenue source for the Department of Health Services (DHS). In just four months following H.R. 1's signing, the County lost an average of 1,000 people per day from Medi-Cal enrollment — over 120,000 people between July and November 2025. During the same four-month period, more than 27,000 children under 18 lost their Medi-Cal coverage, equating to nearly 200 children per day.

2.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Measure ER - Resolution Text (Measure ER)
HOA.105763538.16
WHEREAS, from July 2025 to November 2025, since H.R. 1's signing, over 70,000 County residents were dropped from CalFresh enrollment — including almost 27,000 children under 18.

WHEREAS, this funding and coverage loss will cause a serious threat to the long-term sustainability of critical safety net services relied upon by County residents.

DHS, for example, needs to absorb a projected federal revenue loss exceeding $700 million per year.

WHEREAS, the Department of Public Health (DPH) is projecting a $200-300 million loss in federal and State funds. DPH is forecasting a minimum $42 million deficit in fiscal year 2025-26, requiring various clinic closures, service reductions, personnel reassignments, and possible terminations. This deficit will likely worsen given cuts to federal revenue.

WHEREAS, Medicaid is the single largest source of revenue for Los Angeles County's health departments, including the 23 health centers and four acute care hospitals run by the County and many non-profit safety-net facilities that provide irreplaceable life-saving services for residents of Los Angeles County.

WHEREAS, many key provisions of H.R. 1 took effect immediately, including the prohibition on new provider taxes, which effectively negates Proposition 35 that voters approved in November 2024 and that would have extended the State's managed care organization (MCO) tax and provided needed support to the Medi-Cal program while also providing dedicated funding to public hospitals which was assumed in the current State and County budgets for the current fiscal year.

WHEREAS, H.R. 1 immediately freezes supplemental Medicaid funding and prevents the Los Angeles County health departments from being able to draw down expected and needed supplemental Medicaid payments causing a significant negative impact on the County budget immediately and escalating over time.

WHEREAS, the County will be required to provide certain health care and human services funded with revenue from the County's General Fund which will directly impact the County's ability to provide other vital services to County residents, including, but not limited to, social services, supportive services for unhoused residents, and public safety.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Parts 1.6 and 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the County is authorized to impose a retail transactions and use (sales) tax in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County for general purposes, including health care and human services, at a rate of one-half percent (0.5%).

WHEREAS, section 2 of article XIIIC of the California Constitution, sections 53721-53724 of the California Government Code, and Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code authorize the County of Los Angeles to levy,

2.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Measure ER - Resolution Text (Measure ER)
HOA.105763538.16
increase, or extend a general sales tax upon two-thirds vote of the Board of Supervisors and a majority vote of the electorate.

WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to levy a general sales tax at the rate of one-half percent (0.5 %), effective as of October 1, 2026, to continue for a period of five years.

WHEREAS, pursuant to article XIII C, section 2(b) of the Constitution and California Government Code section 53724(c), an election for the approval of a temporary general sales tax must be consolidated with a regularly scheduled general election for members of the governing body of the local government.

WHEREAS, the County's regularly scheduled elections are held on the same day as the statewide primary election in each even-numbered year, and the next regularly scheduled election for members of the Board of Supervisors and the next statewide primary election will be held on Tuesday, June 2, 2026.

WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors deems it necessary, essential, and in the public interest to submit the sales tax measure to the qualified voters within the County at an election to be held on June 2, 2026, and to consolidate such election with the other elections to be held on that date.

WHEREAS, the tax revenues from this general sales tax levy would partly offset reductions in federal support imposed by H.R. 1 and help the County to continue to provide vital services, including health care and human services to the public.

WHEREAS, voter approval of this ordinance will not affect the County's existing sales taxes, which will continue to be levied.

WHEREAS, to promote accountability and transparency, this ordinance provides for the creation of a citizens' oversight committee that will review the receipt and expenditures of the revenues from the general sales tax and provide annual reporting of the committee's review at a public meeting.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles that:

Section 1. Call of the Election and Purpose. An election shall be held and the same is hereby called and ordered to be held in the County on the 2nd day of June 2026, for the purpose of submitting to the voters: (1) the ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein (Ordinance) by this reference, which was approved by two-thirds vote of the Board of Supervisors. The Ordinance shall become effective if a majority of the qualified voters of the County of Los Angeles voting on the Ordinance measure set forth in Section 2, below, vote in favor of the measure.

2.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Measure ER - Resolution Text (Measure ER)
HOA.105763538.16
Section 2. Ballot Measure. Pursuant to Elections Code section 10403, the measure shall appear on the ballot substantially as follows:

Essential Services Restoration Act for Los Angeles County General Sales Tax Measure
Shall the measure to help our community address severe federal cuts enacted by the President and Congress; reduce the loss of essential services, including healthcare for County residents; reduce the risk of closing the County's four public hospitals and numerous clinics, and significant healthcare provider layoffs and other service cuts by enacting a 1/2 percent (0.5%) general sales tax for 5 years, generating approximately $1 billion annually, with independent audits, be adopted?

Yes

Section 3. Proclamation. Pursuant to section 12001 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles hereby PROCLAIMS that an election shall be held in the County on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, to vote upon the measure.

Section 4. Election Procedure. All qualified voters residing within the County shall be permitted to vote in the election and in all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the elections shall be held as nearly as practicable in conformity with the Elections Code of the State of California. The votes cast for and against the measure shall be separately counted, and if the measure receives a majority of the votes cast by the qualified electors voting on the measure, the general sales tax in the amount stated in the Ordinance shall be effective and ratified. Should another proposed measure with conflicting provisions appear on the same ballot, and each proposed measure receives a majority of votes, the proposed measure with the highest number of affirmative votes shall prevail, in conformity with section 9123 of the Elections Code.

Section 5. Sample Ballot. The Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk is instructed to print the entire proposed Ordinance in the sample ballot.

Section 6. Consolidation. The election called by this Resolution shall be consolidated with the other elections conducted by the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk to be held in the County of Los Angeles on June 2, 2026, and the measure shall be placed on the same ballot in the order set forth in this Resolution. The precincts, polling places, vote centers, precinct board members, election workers, and facilities shall be the same as provided for the June 2, 2026, statewide primary election.

Section 7. Authority. This Resolution is adopted pursuant to sections 10403 and 12001 of the Elections Code and section 25201 of the Government Code. The Executive Officer-Clerk of the Board of Supervisors is ordered to file a copy of this Resolution with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk at least eighty-eight (88) days prior to the day of the election. The Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk is authorized,

2.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Measure ER - Resolution Text (Measure ER)
HOA.105763538.16
instructed, and directed to prepare any documents and take any additional actions that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.

Section 8. California Environment Quality Act. Based upon all of the facts before it on this matter, the Board of Supervisors finds that the submission of the measure to the voters is not subject to, or is exempt from, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Submission of the measure is not a project as defined by California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 15378(b)(4) because it relates to the creation of government funding mechanisms, which do not involve commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:

The foregoing resolution was on the ___ day of _____ 2026, adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles and ex officio the governing body of all other special assessment and taxing districts, agencies, and authorities for which said Board so acts.

EDWARD YEN
Executive Officer
Board of Supervisors
By: __________________________
Deputy
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

DAWYN R. HARRISON
County Counsel
By: _________________________

EVA CHU
Senior Deputy County Counsel

2.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Measure ER - Resolution Text (Measure ER)

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 3

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

NEW BUSINESS
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: SANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOURTH OF JULY PARADE
DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office
PRESENTER: Tracy Sullivan

RECOMMENDED ACTION

BACKGROUND

The Santa Clarita Valley Fourth of July Parade (Parade) is a longstanding community tradition dating back to 1932. Over its history, responsibility for organizing and producing the Parade has transitioned among various lead agencies, including the Newhall Saugus Kiwanis, American Legion Post 507, Downtown Newhall Merchants Association, and most recently, SCVTV, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. While these entities have served as the formal organizers, the majority of planning and logistics has historically been carried out by a volunteer committee.

EVOLVING SCOPE AND OPERATIONAL NEEDS

The volunteer-driven model served the community well for many years; however, the volunteer base has diminished over time, and City staff has increasingly provided operational support to ensure the Parade's continued success, inclusive of staff time to plan and execute the event, equipment rentals, and supplies.

The scope and scale of the Parade have also evolved significantly. What was once a smaller, community-led event has grown into a large-scale production requiring a higher level of 3 Packet Pg. 24

Page 2 ends

coordination, technical expertise, and professional oversight. This includes logistics, such as road closures, traffic control, emergency plans, public safety coordination, and compliance with applicable safety regulations. Furthermore, ensuring appropriate liability coverage and risk management protocols have become increasingly resource-intensive and beyond what can reasonably be sustained through a volunteer-led structure.

RECOMMENDED TRANSFER AND SCVTV’S CONTINUED ROLE

Given these factors, SCVTV, the current lead agency of the Parade, has submitted a letter (attached) expressing its desire to transfer ownership of the Parade to the City, pending City Council approval. SCVTV has additionally expressed a desire to retain responsibility for certain production-related parade functions, including:

• Determination of Parade line-up order,
• Designation of the grand and division marshals,
• Development of the script for the television broadcast, and • Administration of the judging process.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed transfer of ownership, under which the City would assume ownership and operational responsibility for the Parade, while SCVTV would continue to provide the production-related services identified above.

Upon approval, the Parade would be incorporated into the City's portfolio of special events, beginning with the 2026 Parade and continuing thereafter. City administration would provide centralized oversight of Parade logistics, including permitting, route coordination, marketing, and compliance with applicable safety and risk management requirements.

In addition, the City would assume responsibility for Parade registration processes and the collection and management of any associated revenues. The Parade generates approximately $7,000 in annual revenues from participant registration fees, which would continue under City oversight and be used to offset costs associated with existing City event logistics and operations currently contained within the Arts and Events division base budget.

The recommended approach will help ensure the continued success, safety, and long-term stability of this longstanding community tradition.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION

Other actions as determined by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT

The City currently provides operational support to the Parade, including staff resources for traffic control and event operations, which is covered within the Arts and Events division's base budget.

Any incremental costs associated with enhanced safety measures and full City administration of the Parade will be incorporated into the City's annual budget development process for consideration and appropriation.
3 Packet Pg. 25

Page 3 ends

ATTACHMENTS
SCVTV Letter Regarding Parade Ownership
3 Packet Pg. 26

Ken Striplin, City Manager
City of Santa Clarita
23920 W. Valencia Boulevard
Santa Clarita, California 91355
By email
May 4, 2026
Dear Mr. Striplin:

The Santa Clarita Valley (originally “Newhall”) Fourth of July Parade has been an annual tradition since 1932. It has been an honor and a privilege to help keep this tradition alive since 1996, when I took over the parade from Bob Martin and Virgil Saunders of the Downtown Newhall Merchants Association (DNMA). Over these past 30 years, the legal owner of the parade has been DNMA, followed by an independent not-for-profit commit- tee, and most recently SCVTV , a 501(c)(3) nonprofit public benefit corporation.

Much has changed in 30 years. In 1996, our city had not yet seen its tenth birthday. There were no cell phones, no social media, and email use wasn’t universal. We had a robust volunteer committee that organized all aspects of the parade. A dozen subcommittee chairs were responsible for discrete parade functions and came together year after year to perform their duties.

Today, many longtime parade volunteers are no longer with us; most organizing functions are automated and/or handled by City staff; and the dramatically increased cost of insur- ing a huge community event that draws an estimated 25,000 spectators annually exceeds the means of a small nonprofit organization.

For these reasons, I wish to relinquish our ownership interest in the Santa Clarita Valley Fourth of July Parade to the City of Santa Clarita, both personally and on behalf of SCVTV per SCVTV Board Resolution 2026-2 (attached).

Since its inception, the parade has been a whole-community celebration. As it changed incrementally through the years, one thing remained constant: It has reflected who we are as a community. All are welcome to participate, regardless of political, religious, or other affiliation. While commercial entries have always been welcome – from the Newhall Ice Company in 1932 to the SCV Farmers Markets in 2025 – the parade itself is unaffiliated and noncommercial. Maintaining a level playing field has been our guiding principle.

3.a
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: SCVTV Letter Regarding Parade Ownership (Santa Clarita Valley 4th of July Parade) The City of Santa Clarita is the logical entity to own and manage the parade. Upon the transfer of ownership, parade entry fees, if any, would be collected and managed by the City of Santa Clarita. Historically, entry fees have covered the cost of incidentals such as trophies, signage, portable toilets, and stipends for contracted musical entries. Ownership of current operational resources including the parade website (SCVParade.com) would transfer to the City.

Our City is the one local entity with the capacity and intention to operate the parade in a nondiscriminatory manner. I hope the City will retain “Valley” in the Santa Clarita Valley Fourth of July Parade name, as the parade has always been for everyone without regard to municipal boundaries.

SCVTV has provided live and tape-delayed coverage of the parade for many years. In re- cent times, SCVTV has utilized a minimum of 6 cameras and approximately two dozen crew members to provide this coverage. In doing so, SCVTV has provided the means for the rest of the community – those who aren’t among the 25,000 spectators – to enjoy the parade, and SCVTV’s coverage has enabled participants to see themselves and share their experiences with out-of-town friends and relatives. It is the intention of SCVTV to con- tinue to provide this coverage.

Certain aspects of the parade are part and parcel of the television production. The televi- sion production requires an orderly lineup, usually with a grand marshal and division marshals; a script; and judged entries insofar as the telecast includes the identification of trophy winners. Thus, we propose that SCVTV continue to coordinate with the City staff and take responsibility for the following parade functions:
•
Lineup
, including designation of grand and division marshals
• S
cript
• Judging
of entries (but not trophies)
The transfer of ownership and management of the parade and its operational resources would take immediate effect upon approval by the City. SCVTV’s decision to transfer ownership is not contingent upon the City’s acceptance of any or all of the recommenda- tions outlined above.

Thank you for your consideration.

Leon
Worden
Secretary, SCVTV

3.a
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: SCVTV Letter Regarding Parade Ownership (Santa Clarita Valley 4th of July Parade) RESOLUTION NO. 2026-02

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SCVTV APPROVING

THE TRANSFER OF ALL RIGHT, TITLE, AND INTEREST IN THE

SANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOURTH OF JULY PARADE TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,

SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE SANTA CLARITA CITY COUNCIL
WHEREAS, SCVTV has held certain rights, title, ownership, or other interest in and to the Santa Clarita Valley Fourth of July Parade; and
WHEREAS, SCVTV has used or held the name "SCV Fourth of July Parade" as a ﬁctitious business name, trade name, or related organizational designation in connection with the operation of the parade; and
WHEREAS, the Santa Clarita Valley Fourth of July Parade is a long-standing community event serving the residents of the Santa Clarita Valley; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined that it is in the best interest of SCVTV and the community for SCVTV to transfer all of its right, title, and interest in and to the Santa Clarita Valley Fourth of July Parade to the City of Santa Clarita; and WHEREAS, such transfer is subject to approval by the Santa Clarita City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of SCVTV hereby approves the transfer, assignment, and conveyance to the City of Santa Clarita and/or abandonment of all of SCVTV's right, title, and interest in and to the Santa Clarita Valley Fourth of July Parade, including any rights associated with the name "SCV Fourth of July Parade, " any ﬁctitious business name, trade name, goodwill, records, and other related interests, subject to approval by the Santa Clarita City Council;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon approval by the Santa Clarita City Council, the President or Secretary of SCVTV is authorized to execute any documents and take any actions reasonably necessary to effectuate this resolution.

ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of SCVTV on May 1, 2026. ________________________________

Leon Worden, Secretary
SCVTV

3.a
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: SCVTV Letter Regarding Parade Ownership (Santa Clarita Valley 4th of July Parade)

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
City Council
Special Meeting
~Minutes~
Tuesday, April 28, 2026 5:45 PM City Council Chambers

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Weste called to order the Special Meeting of the City Council at 5:45 p.m.

ROLL CALL
All Councilmembers were present.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION FOR AGENDIZED ITEMS
No requests to speak were received.

CLOSED SESSION
Joseph Montes, City Attorney, advised of the need to conduct a Closed Session for the purpose of holding a:

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Government Code Section 54956.8
Property Location: Sierra Highway and Dockweiler Drive
Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 2848-018-020 and 2848-018-016 (94+/- acres) Negotiating Parties: Watt Land Inc.

City’s Authorized Negotiator: City Manager
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
Property Location: End of Wistaria Valley Road
Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 2854-004-017 and 2854-004-018 (82+/- acres) Negotiating Parties: WP Canyon Country Associates
City’s Authorized Negotiator: City Manager
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
Property Location: Shadow Pines Boulevard and Tick Canyon Road Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 2853-007-003, 3211-018-058, 3211-019-017, 2854-003-005, 2854-003-006, 2854-021-004, 2854-021-005, 2854-021-006, 2854-021-007, 2854-021- 022, 2854-021-023, 2854-021-024, 2854-021-025, 2854-021-026, 2853-006-005, and 2853-007-002 (500+/- acres)
Negotiating Parties: WH Park Place 492 LLC
City’s Authorized Negotiator: City Manager
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
4 Packet Pg. 30
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 28, 2026 5:45 PM (Consent Calendar)

Page 2 ends

RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION - TO BE HELD IN THE CARL BOYER ROOM Mayor Weste recessed the meeting to Closed Session at 5:45 p.m.

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
Mayor Weste reconvened the meeting to Open Session at 6:00 p.m.

CITY ATTORNEY ANNOUNCEMENT
City Attorney Joseph Montes announced that no action was taken in Closed Session that was required to be reported.

ADJOURN
Mayor Weste adjourned the Special Meeting at 6:04 p.m.
______________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________

CITY CLERK
4 Packet Pg. 31
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 28, 2026 5:45 PM (Consent Calendar)

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
City Council
Regular Meeting
Joint Meeting with
Board of Library Trustees
Hereinafter the titles Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, Councilmember, City Manager, City Attorney, and City Clerk may be used also to indicate Mayor/Chair/President, Mayor Pro Tem/Vice-Chair/Vice President, City Manager/Executive Director, City Attorney/Counsel, and City Clerk/Secretary ~Minutes~
Tuesday, April 28, 2026 6:00 PM City Council Chambers

INVOCATION
Councilmember Miranda delivered the invocation.

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Weste called to order the Joint Regular Meeting of the City Council and Board of Library Trustees at 6:06 p.m.

ROLL CALL
All Councilmembers were present.

FLAG SALUTE
Councilmember Miranda led the flag salute.

Councilwoman McLean pulled item 4 for a separate vote.

AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS
Mayor Weste and Councilmember Miranda recognized retiring City Clerk Mary Cusick for more than three decades of service to the City of Santa Clarita and highlighted her work with the City during her tenure. Mayor Weste thanked Ms. Cusick for her dedication, presented her with a certificate, and invited her family and friends to the dais to take a commemorative photo. 5 Packet Pg. 32
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 28, 2026 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)

Page 2 ends

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Addressing the Council were Mike PrajaPati regarding the business impacts of the Bouquet Canyon Road closure; Sonny Morper, a member of the Belcaro senior community, regarding fire prevention; and Amy Hovsepian regarding resident complaints in the Bridgeport community.

STAFF COMMENTS
City Manager Ken Striplin stated that staff will reach out to the Ms. Hovsepian to discuss ideas to help address Bridgeport residents’ concerns. Regarding fire prevention concerns, City Manager Striplin stated that the City has responded to Mr. Morper and that Councilmember Gibbs offered to follow up. Regarding business concerns due to the Bouquet Canyon Road closure, City Manager Striplin stated that staff has attempted to address the issues as best as possible, including posting signage, and is happy to maintain an ongoing dialogue with Mr.

PrajaPati, as well as other business owners in the area, to explore ways to support those businesses.

Mayor Pro Tem Ayala asked how many businesses in the area have been affected and suggested the City make additional efforts to help provide exposure for those impacted businesses.

Mayor Weste requested to visit Bouquet Canyon with staff and thanked the Bridgeport resident for bringing awareness to community concerns.

Councilwoman McLean commented on the businesses impacted by the Bouquet Canyon Road closure and stated she would like a list of businesses affected. She thanked Mr. Morper for working with the Firewise group, noted concerns regarding fire insurance issues, and highlighted that the Bridgeport area needs assistance.

COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
Councilmember Miranda expressed appreciation for City Clerk Mary Cusick and acknowledged her upcoming retirement.

Mayor Pro Tem Ayala commented on the success of the Cowboy Festival and announced the inaugural “May the 4th Be With You” celebration at Central Park. She thanked City Clerk Mary Cusick for her service, recognized Legacy Christian Academy, noted a Sanitation District meeting with Supervisor Barger, congratulated Councilmember Miranda on his presentation and book, acknowledged the Southland Regional Association of Realtors, highlighted the Senior Center Golden Gala, and mentioned attending the Home and Garden Show.

Councilmember Gibbs commented on recent events he attended, including the Cowboy Festival and the Senior Center Golden Gala. He recognized the Senior Center’s service to the community, thanked Kevin MacDonald and the board, congratulated Legacy Christian Academy, and thanked City Clerk Mary Cusick for her service.

Councilwoman McLean noted that several Councilmembers attended the same events and highlighted the Homeless Task Force’s April 15 meeting and its ongoing efforts to educate the public and address homelessness in partnership with nonprofit organizations and legislators, as well as efforts to improve attendance and engagement at future meetings. Councilwoman 5 Packet Pg. 33
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 28, 2026 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)

Page 3 ends

McLean recognized the Walk of Western Stars ceremony honoring Gary Combs and the Happy Family, and praised City staff and volunteers for their work at the Cowboy Festival. She also referenced the California High-Speed Rail Ad Hoc Committee letter regarding concerns with the 2026 Business Plan, the successful Senior Center Gala, and the Legislative Committee’s discussion regarding a proposed 0.5 percent county sales tax increase. She encouraged the public to review the proposal and thanked City Clerk Mary Cusick for her service.

Mayor Weste commented on staff and volunteers supporting approximately 10,000 attendees per day at the Cowboy Festival and highlighted family activities including dancers, blacksmithing demonstrations, and horse petting. She also discussed Friends of Hart Park and the new movie theater in Hart Hall, noting $65,000 was raised for equipment and potential future uses. She congratulated Liz Caddow of Trinity Classical Academy and commented on the Senior Center Gala, noting the Bella Vida building is available for rental.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar was approved with the exception of Item 4.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Jason Gibbs, Councilmember
SECONDER: Patsy Ayala, Mayor Pro Tem
AYES: Weste, Ayala, Gibbs, McLean, Miranda
ITEM 1
APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES – The minutes are submitted for approval.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council approve the minutes of the April 14, 2026, Regular Meeting.

ITEM 2
CHECK REGISTER NO. 09
Check Register No. 09 for Period 03/20/26 through 04/02/26 and 04/09/26. Electronic Funds Transfers for the Period 03/23/26 through 04/03/26.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council approve and ratify for payment the demands presented in Check Register No. 09.

ITEM 3

SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING COUNCILMEMBER COMPENSATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 36516
Government Code Section 36516(a) allows regular adjustments to the City Council compensation. The second reading of the ordinance increases Councilmember compensation by a total of 5 percent effective 2027. The last increase of Councilmember compensation was effective in 2025.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council conduct a second reading and adopt an ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.04.048 OF THE SANTA CLARITA MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING CITY COUNCIL SALARY."
5 Packet Pg. 34
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 28, 2026 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)

Page 4 ends

Adopted Ordinance No. 26-1
ITEM 4 WAS MOVED TO ITEMS PULLED FOR A SEPARATE VOTE
ITEM 5

AGENDA MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SOFTWARE CONTRACTS The software for the City's agenda management platform will sunset in the near term. This item requests City Council consideration of a new agenda management system and public engagement platform.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Approve the use of a cooperative agreement through OMNIA Partners contract #23-6692-01 and award a three-year contract to Carahsoft Technology Corp. for the eScribe Agenda Management software platform in the amount of $160,025, and authorize a five percent contingency in the amount of $8,001 for potential additional services or unforeseen costs, for a total contract amount not to exceed $168,026.

2. Approve the use of a cooperative agreement through NASPO contract #AR2472 and award a one-year contract to Carahsoft Technology Corp. for the PublicInput public engagement software platform in the amount of $25,568, and authorize a five percent contingency in the amount of $1,278 for potential additional services or unforeseen costs, for a total contract amount not to exceed $26,846.

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute up to two additional one-year renewal options for both contracts, each not to exceed the annual contract amount, inclusive of contingency and any approved price escalations, and subject to annual appropriation by the City Council.

4. Appropriate a one-time appropriation of $16,783 from the Computer Replacement (Fund 720) to Expenditure Account 720220-516101, and $74,482 from the General Fund (Fund 100) to Expenditure Account 1002200-516101.

5. Appropriate $51,039 and $52,570 from the General Fund (Fund 100) to Expenditure Account 1002200-516101 for FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28 respectively, subject to City Council appropriation through the annual budget process.

6. Contingent upon execution of the renewal options for both contracts, appropriate additional funds from the General Fund (Fund 100) to Expenditure Account 1002200-516101 in the amount of $23,268 for FY 2026-27, $24,198 for FY 2027-28, $54,149 for FY 2028-29, and $55,773 for FY 2029-30, subject to City Council appropriation through the annual budget process.

7. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney review.
5 Packet Pg. 35
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 28, 2026 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)

Page 5 ends

ITEM 6
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LMD ZONE 29 VILLA METRO, ZONE 30 PENLON, AND ZONE 31 RIVER VILLAGE
City Council consideration to award a contract to Stay Green, Inc., to provide recurring landscape maintenance services for Landscape Maintenance District Zone 29 (Villa Metro), Zone 30 (Penlon) and Zone 31 (Five Knolls).

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Award a five-year contract to Stay Green, Inc., to provide landscape maintenance services for Landscape Maintenance District Zone 29 (Villa Metro), Zone 30 (Penlon), and Zone 31 (Five Knolls), for a total contract amount not to exceed $733,370.

2. Appropriate an ongoing budget increase, beginning in Fiscal Year 2026-27, from the Landscape Maintenance District Fund Balance (Fund 357) in the amount of $2,100 to expenditure account 3572460-516110 and $21,758 to expenditure account 3572461-516110, contingent upon appropriation of funds by the City Council in each fiscal year.

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney review.

4. Find that the award of contract is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Article 19 – Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, (h) Maintenance of Existing Landscaping.

ITEM 7

BUS SERVICES FOR USE BY RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES

PROGRAMS CONTRACT
Transportation services are needed for several Recreation and Community Services programs including Camp Clarita, Junior Lifeguards, and offerings available at the Canyon Country and Newhall Community Centers. In order to provide for the transportation of program participants, bids were solicited from bus service providers.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Award a one-year contract to Zūm Services, Inc., to provide bus services for the Recreation and Community Services Division in the amount of $93,775, and authorize a contingency of $9,378, for a total contract not to exceed $103,153.

2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute up to two additional one-year renewal options, each not to exceed the annual contract amount, plus any adjustments consistent with the appropriate Consumer Price Index, upon request of the contractor, and contingent upon the appropriation of funds by the City Council in the annual budget for such fiscal year.

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, 5 Packet Pg. 36
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 28, 2026 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)

Page 6 ends

subject to City Attorney review.

ITEM 8
VALENCIA GLEN PARK POOL RE-PLASTER P0026 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
This item considers awarding a construction contract for the Valencia Glen Park Pool Re-Plaster.

The improvements include re-plastering of the pool, and replacement of the underwater lights, skimmers, lane line anchors, main drain covers, and depth markers.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Valencia Glen Park Pool Re-Plaster Project P0026.

2. Award a construction contract to National Pools Inc. for pool re-plaster services in the amount of $277,160 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $27,716, for a total contract amount not to exceed $304,876.

3. Find the Valencia Glen Park Pool Re-Plaster Project P0026 exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Article 19, Section 15301.

4. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney review.

ITEM 9

HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE AND EMERGENCY REPAIR

CONTRACT
The City of Santa Clarita Neighborhood Services Department administers maintenance operations for all City-owned facilities. This item is to secure contracted services for ongoing heating and air conditioning maintenance and emergency repairs to ensure reliable and efficient operation of City facilities.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Approve the use of a cooperative agreement through Sourcewell contract #080824-JHN and award a five-year contract to Johnson Controls, Inc., for heating and air conditioning maintenance and emergency repair services for all City-owned facilities for a total contract amount not to exceed $1,986,786.

2. Authorize an ongoing appropriation to the Contractual Services accounts listed on Exhibit A for a total amount of $4,753 in Fiscal Year 2027-28, $4,849 for Fiscal Year 2028-29, $4,946 for Fiscal Year 2029-30, and $5,045 for Fiscal Year 2030-31, contingent upon the appropriation of funds in the annual budget for such fiscal years.

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, 5 Packet Pg. 37
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 28, 2026 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)

Page 7 ends

and to modify the awardees in the event of project withdrawal or abandonment, subject to City Attorney review.

ITEM 10
2025-26 FEDERAL CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, PHASE IV, PROJECT C1018 - PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS This item considers awarding a construction contract for the 2025-26 Federal Circulation Improvement Program, Phase IV project. The improvements will enhance traffic circulation at the intersection of Valencia Boulevard and McBean Parkway. Improvements include construction of triple left-turn lanes on eastbound and westbound Valencia Boulevard, improvements to the existing traffic signal, street lighting adjustments, hardscape installation, roadway widening, traffic signage and striping, and landscaping improvements.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the 2025-26 Federal Circulation Improvement Program, Phase IV, Project C1018.

2. Find and determine that the 2025-26 Federal Circulation Improvement Program, Phase IV project was identified as a traffic mitigation measure (TR-5) and previously analyzed within the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the Valencia Town Center by the City of Santa Clarita’s Planning Commission (Resolution P20-01), and that no further environmental review is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15162.

3. Award a construction contract to C.A. Rasmussen, Inc., for the 2025-26 Federal Circulation Improvement Program, Phase IV project in the amount of $2,263,315 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $339,497, for a total contract amount not to exceed $2,602,812.

4. Award a professional services contract to Dokken Engineering, to provide construction support services for the 2025-26 Federal Circulation Improvement Program, Phase IV project in the amount of $67,920 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $6,792, for a total contract amount not to exceed $74,712.

5. Award a professional services contract to Allan E. Seward Engineering Geology, Inc., for the 2025-26 Federal Circulation Improvement Program, Phase IV project to provide materials testing and geotechnical inspection services in the amount of $70,874 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $7,087, for a total contract amount not to exceed $77,961.

6. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney review.
5 Packet Pg. 38
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 28, 2026 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)

Page 8 ends

ITEM 11

SUMMARY VACATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES AT

SHAPELL - PLUM CANYON APARTMENTS (WHITES CANYON ROAD)
Approval of this resolution would provide for the summary vacation of a sanitary sewer easement at the Plum Canyon Apartments, located at 19300 Maybrook Lane.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution for the summary vacation of an easement for sanitary sewer purposes, as described in Exhibit “A” Legal Description and shown on Exhibit “B” Exhibit Map, of the attached resolution.

2. Direct the City Clerk to record the certified original resolution in the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder's office.

Adopted Resolution No. 26-11

ITEMS PULLED FOR A SEPARATE VOTE
ITEM 4

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ORDINANCE AND HOUSING LAW UPDATE - SECOND

READING
Second reading of amendments to the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, regarding the City of Santa Clarita's accessory dwelling unit ordinance, the two-unit development ordinance, and Housing Element Policy HP-2.1.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council:

1. Find the Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance and Housing Law Updates project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as adoption of an ADU ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.17, adoption of a Senate Bill 9 ordinance is exempt from CEQA under Government Code § 66411.7(n), and implementation of Housing Element Program HP-2.1 is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code of Regs. § 15000, et seq.) Section 15061(b)(3), the common-sense exemption.

2. Adopt an ordinance entitled: “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MASTER CASE 26-011 (UDC26- 001), AMENDING THE SANTA CLARITA MUNICIPAL CODE.”
Mayor Pro Tem Ayala inquired and City Manager Ken Striplin responded to questions regarding tracking long-term impacts of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs).

Mayor Weste noted that the Sanitation District is also monitoring ADUs due to potential impacts on sewage infrastructure.
5 Packet Pg. 39
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 28, 2026 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)

Page 9 ends

Adopted Ordinance No. 26-2
RESULT: APPROVED [4 TO 1]
MOVER: Jason Gibbs, Councilmember
SECONDER: Patsy Ayala, Mayor Pro Tem
AYES: Laurene Weste, Patsy Ayala, Jason Gibbs, Bill Miranda NAYS: Marsha McLean

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION II
No additional requests to speak were received.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Weste adjourned the Regular Meeting at 6:53 p.m.
______________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________

CITY CLERK
5 Packet Pg. 40
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 28, 2026 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar)

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 6

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: CHECK REGISTER NO. 10
DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services
PRESENTER: Brittany Houston

RECOMMENDED ACTION

City Council approve and ratify for payment the demands presented in Check Register No. 10.

BACKGROUND

Check Register No. 10 for the Period 04/03/26 through 04/16/26 and 04/23/26 in the aggregate amount of $7,254,064.02 inclusive of Electronic Funds Transfers for the Period 04/06/26 through 04/17/26 in the aggregate amount of $743,203.75.

FISCAL IMPACT

Adequate funds are available in the budgeted expenditure accounts to support the Check Register payments.

ATTACHMENTS
Memo - Check Register No. 10
Check Register No. 10 (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) 6 Packet Pg. 41

6.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Memo - Check Register No. 10 (Check Register No. 10)

6.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Memo - Check Register No. 10 (Check Register No. 10)

6.a
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Memo - Check Register No. 10 (Check Register No. 10)

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 7

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: STATE LEGISLATION: ASSEMBLY BILL 748 AND ASSEMBLY BILL 1621
DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office
PRESENTER: Masis Hagobian

RECOMMENDED ACTION

City Council:

1. Oppose AB 748 (Harabedian), and AB 1621 (Wilson).

2. Transmit position statements to the authors of the bills, Santa Clarita’s state legislative delegation, appropriate legislative committees, Governor Newsom, and other stakeholder organizations.

BACKGROUND

The following items were presented to the City Council Legislative Committee on April 28, 2026. Included as part of this report is a brief summary of each item and its current status in the legislative process.

The recommendation to oppose Assembly Bill 748 and Assembly Bill 1621 and the feedback received by the City Council Legislative Committee on these two bills is consistent with the City of Santa Clarita 2026 Executive and Legislative Platform. Specifically, Component 1 under the “State” section advises that the City Council, “Oppose legislation that would interfere with, limit, or eliminate the decision-making authority of municipalities in the area of local land use.”

Assembly Bill 748

Introduced by Assembly Member John Harabedian (D-41-Pasadena), Assembly Bill 748 requires cities and counties to develop a program for the preapproval of a single-family or multifamily residential housing plan by July 1, 2027, for large jurisdictions and January 1, 2029, for small jurisdictions.
7 Packet Pg. 45

Page 2 ends

The bill would require cities and counties to post preapproved plans on the local government’s website and ministerially - without discretionary review - approve or deny a housing project application that utilizes a preapproved plan within 30 days. The lot of the proposed project must meet the soil conditions, topography, flood zone, zoning regulations, and design review standards for which the preapproved housing plan was designed and the application is consistent with the current triennial California Building Standards Code rulemaking cycle.

The City currently has policies and standards in reviewing housing projects to ensure that the use of the project, when considered on the basis of the suitability of the proposed site, is arranged to ensure the protection of public health, safety, and general welfare. The City’s review is also intended to facilitate the provision of utility services and other public facilities, commensurate with anticipated population and dwelling unit densities, promote the City’s historical and natural resources such as oak trees, river areas, and ridgelines, is in conformity with good zoning practice, and prevent adverse effects on neighboring property.

In requiring local governments to accept preapproved plans and approve or deny project applications within 30 days, Assembly Bill 748 upends the City’s ability to maintain due diligence when reviewing a housing project application and determining the suitability of the project as it relates to the desired project location. The City, not unlike areas within the author’s district, is predominantly located within California’s Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ). As the legislation lacks an exemption to areas within an FHSZ, Assembly Bill 748 poses significant constraints to the City’s review in determining project suitability and taking into consideration potential risk to health and safety in these areas.

This is the author’s second attempt at this legislation. Assembly Bill 1206, failed to pass last year, as it was held in the Senate Appropriations Committee’s suspense file. The City Council voted on April 22, 2025, to oppose Assembly Bill 1206.

Assembly Bill 748 passed the Assembly (75-0-5) on January 26, 2026, and is pending committee assignment in the Senate. Assembly Member Schiavo voted in favor of the bill on the Assembly Floor.

Supporters:

California Home Building Alliance

Opponents:

Unknown at this time.

Assembly Bill 1621

Introduced by Assembly Member Lori Wilson (D-11-Suisin City), Assembly Bill 1621 establishes new requirements for the review and appeal of local building permit applications for residential projects.

Specifically, Assembly Bill 1621 limits the number of plan-checks to two rounds for a local building permit related to a residential project, unless written findings are made based on 7 Packet Pg. 46

Page 3 ends

substantial evidence in the record that additional reviews are necessary to address an adverse impact on public health or safety.

Additionally, this bill prohibits a local government from requiring corrective action following an inspection if the findings were not required as part the original or previously approved plan, unless written findings are made based on substantial evidence in the record that both (a) a reasonable person could not interpret the previously approved plan as being compliant with the applicable building standards and (b) the deviation is necessary to address an adverse impact on public health or safety.

Assembly Bill 1621 also makes the following changes to the process and requirements that apply if a postentitlement phase building permit is determined to be incomplete or denied, or determined to be noncompliant:

• Removes the authority of a state or local agency to provide that the right of appeal is to the director of the agency and for the local agency to provide the option to appeal to the Planning Commission; and

• Reduces the amount of time within which a local agency must provide a final written determination after receipt of an applicant’s written appeal, as follows:

o With respect to a post-entitlement phase building permit concerning a residential project with 25 units or fewer, a local agency must provide a final written determination no later than 30 business days (instead of 60 business days) after receipt of the applicant’s written appeal; and

o With respect to a postentitlement phase building permit concerning a residential project with 26 units or more, a local agency shall provide a final written determination no later than 45 business days (instead of 90 business days) after receipt of the applicant’s written appeal.

The City’s plan check review is conducted in an effort to ensure that construction is done in compliance with state building codes and local ordinances. These standards are intended to protect the integrity of buildings and the welfare of the community.

Typically, building permits go through an extensive review process, assessing the viability of the plans and the project’s impact to public health and safety, in addition to other goals, including air quality regulations, capacity of public utilities, and parking. This affords the City’s Building & Safety division the ability to review residential projects based on unique community circumstances and needs, and ensures that a site has adequate access to services and resources to support residential use and sustain the proposed residential density.

Assembly Bill 1621 passed the Assembly Committee on Appropriations (13-0-2) on April 22, 2026, and is pending a vote on the Assembly Floor, as of the development of this report.

Supporters:

California Building Industry Association (Sponsor)
7 Packet Pg. 47

Page 4 ends

California Apartment Association
California Association of Realtors
California Business Roundtable
California Chamber of Commerce
California YIMBY

Opponents:

California State Association of Counties (Unless Amended) League of California Cities (Unless Amended)
Rural County Representatives of California (Unless Amended)

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no fiscal impact as a result of this item.

ATTACHMENTS
Assembly BIll 748 - Bill Text
Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text
7 Packet Pg. 48
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JANUARY 5, 2026
california legislature—2025–26 regular session
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 748
Introduced by Assembly Member Harabedian
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Haney and Ward)
February 18, 2025
An act to amend Section 90018 of the Financial Code, relating to financial institutions. An act to add Section 65852.29 to the Government Code, relating to housing.
legislative counsel’s digest
AB 748, as amended, Harabedian. Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation: annual report. Single-family and multifamily housing units: preapproved plans.

Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, or dinances, rules and r egulations by counties and cities and the implementation of those g eneral plans as may be in ef fect in those counties or cities. In that r egard, existing law r equires eac h local a gency, by J anuary 1, 2025, to de velop a program for the preapproval of accessory dwelling unit plans.

This bill would r equire each local agency, as defined, to de velop a program for the preapproval of single-family and multifamily residential housing plans, wher eby the local a gency accepts single-family and multifamily plan submissions for preapproval and approves or denies the preapproval applications, as specified. The bill would r equire a large jurisdiction, as defined, to develop this program by July 1, 2027, and a small jurisdiction, as defined, to develop a program by January 1, 2029. The bill would r equire the local a gency to post pr eapproved

Revised 1-22-26—See last page. 98

7.a
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Assembly BIll 748 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) single-family or multifamily residential housing plans and the contact information of the applicant on the local agency’s internet website.

This bill would r equire a local a gency to either appr ove or deny ministerially an application for a single-family or multifamily residential housing unit within 30 days if the lot meets certain conditions and the application utilizes specified plans that have been preapproved by the local a gency or that ar e identical to a plan used in an application approved by the local agency. The bill would prohibit the preapproval program fr om applying to single-family or multifamily r esidential housing plans intended for use in certain communities and developments, as specified.

Existing law r equires eac h county and eac h city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term g eneral plan for the physical de velopment of the county or city , and specified land outside its boundaries, that includes, among other specified mandatory elements, a housing element.

That law requires the planning a gency of a city or county to pr ovide by April 1 of each year an annual report to, among other entities, the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation. Existing law requires the annual report to include , among other things, the city’ s or county’ s progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs, as specified.

Existing law , the California En vironmental Quality Act (CEQA), requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of , an en vironmental impact r eport on a project that it pr oposes to carry out or appr ove that may have a significant ef fect on the en vironment. CEQA does not apply to the approval of ministerial projects.

To the e xtent that the ministerial r eview process established by the bill would apply to final, discretionary approval of an application for a single-family or multifamily housing unit, the bill would exempt those projects from CEQA.

This bill, be ginning on April 1, 2028, for lar ge jurisdictions and beginning on April 1, 2030, for small jurisdictions, would r equire the local a gency to include in its annual r eport the number of units of residential housing that ar e approved using a pr eapproved housing plan pursuant to this act.

By imposing new duties on local agencies with regard to developing a preapproval program and its annual r eport, the bill would cr eate a state-mandated local program.
98 — 2 — AB 748

7.a
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Assembly BIll 748 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) The bill would include findings that c hanges proposed by this bill address a matter of state wide concern rather than a municipal af fair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.

The California Constitution r equires the state to r eimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state .

Statutory pr ovisions establish pr ocedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

The California Consumer Financial Protection La w requires the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Inno vation to prepare and publish on the Department of Financial Protection and Inno vation’s internet website an annual report detailing actions taken during the prior year under the la w and requires the report to include information on specified actions, as provided.

This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to these provisions.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no yes. State-mandated local program: no yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
line 1 SECTION 1. Section 65852.29 is added to the Government line 2 Code, to read:
line 3 65852.29. (a)  Each local agency shall, by July 1, 2027, develop line 4 a program for the pr eapproval of single-family and multifamily line 5 residential housing plans. The program shall comply with all of line 6 the following:
line 7 (1)  The local agency shall accept single-family and multifamily line 8 residential housing plan submissions for preapproval. line 9 (2)  (A)  The local agency shall approve or deny the application line 10 for preapproval pursuant to the standards established in applicable line 11 state and local housing regulations.
line 12 (B)  The local a gency may c harge the applicant the same line 13 permitting fees that the local a gency would charge an applicant line 14 seeking approval for the same-sized single-family or multifamily line 15 residential housing unit in reviewing and approving a preapproved line 16 housing plan submission.
line 17 (C)  An application for pr eapproval under this section shall line 18 include a statement by the applicant that the applicant has line 19 sufficient authority, license, or owner ship interest in the plan to 98 AB 748 — 3 —

7.a
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Assembly BIll 748 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 submit the plan for preapproval and, if approved, posted pursuant line 2 to clause (i) of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (3). line 3 (3)  (A)  (i)  Single-family and multifamily r esidential housing line 4 plans that are preapproved pursuant to this subdivision shall be line 5 posted on the local agency’s internet website.
line 6 (ii)  The posting of a pr eapproved housing plan pur suant to line 7 clause (i) shall not be considered an endorsement of the applicant line 8 or approval of the applicant’ s application for a single-family or line 9 multifamily residential housing unit by the local agency. line 10 (B)  (i)  The local agency shall also post the contact information line 11 of the applicant of a pr eapproved housing plan, as pr ovided by line 12 the applicant.
line 13 (ii)  The local agency shall not be responsible for the accuracy line 14 of the contact information posted pursuant to clause (i). line 15 (C)  A local a gency shall remove a preapproved housing plan line 16 from their internet website within 30 days of r eceiving a request line 17 for removal from the applicant.
line 18 (4)  (A)  A local a gency may also admit plans that have been line 19 developed and preapproved by the local agency for single-family line 20 and multifamily residential housing plans into the program. line 21 (B)  This section shall not r equire a local a gency to post a line 22 preapproved single-family or multifamily residential housing plan line 23 that is not submitted by an applicant.
line 24 (5)  This section shall not prevent a local agency from voluntarily line 25 accepting or admitting additional plans at higher densities in line 26 additional zoning districts into the pr eapproved housing plan line 27 program, at the local agency’s discretion.
line 28 (b)  The pr eapproval pr ogram established pur suant to this line 29 section shall not apply to single-family or multifamily residential line 30 housing plans intended for use in a master-planned community, a line 31 planned unit development, or a similar lar ge-scale development line 32 that includes the subdivision of land for the construction of multiple line 33 new housing units.
line 34 (c)  A local agency shall approve or deny an application for a line 35 single-family or multifamily r esidential housing unit that uses a line 36 preapproved housing plan ministerially without discr etionary line 37 review. The local a gency shall either appr ove or deny the line 38 application within 30 days from the date the local agency receives line 39 a completed application, if the lot for whic h the application is line 40 proposed meets the soil conditions, topography, flood zone, zoning 98 — 4 — AB 748

7.a
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Assembly BIll 748 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 regulations, and design r eview standar ds for whic h the line 2 preapproved housing plan was designed and the application utilizes line 3 either of the following:
line 4 (1)  A plan for a single-family or multifamily residential housing line 5 unit that has been pr eapproved by the local a gency within the line 6 current triennial California Building Standards Code rulemaking line 7 cycle.
line 8 (2)  A plan that is identical to a plan used in an application for line 9 a single- or multifamily residential housing unit approved by the line 10 local a gency within the curr ent triennial California Building line 11 Standards Code rulemaking cycle.
line 12 (d)  (1)  Beginning on April 1, 2028, lar ge jurisdictions shall line 13 include in their annual report required pursuant to Section 65400 line 14 the number of units of residential housing that are approved using line 15 a preapproved housing plan pursuant to this section. line 16 (2)  Beginning on April 1, 2030, small jurisdictions shall include line 17 in their annual r eport r equired pur suant to Section 65400 the line 18 number of units of residential housing that are approved using a line 19 preapproved housing plan pursuant to this section. line 20 (e)  This section shall not apply to a small jurisdiction until line 21 January 1, 2029.
line 22 (f)  For purposes of this section:
line 23 (1)  “Large jurisdiction” means a county that is not a small line 24 jurisdiction or any city with a population with 25,000 or more as line 25 of January 1, 2019, within that county.
line 26 (2)  “Local agency” means a city, county, or city and county. line 27 (3)  “Multifamily r esidential housing” means a b uilding line 28 containing 2 to 10 residential units.
line 29 (4)  “Single-family residential housing” has the same meaning line 30 as defined in applicable housing regulations.
line 31 (5)  “Small jurisdiction” means a county with a population of line 32 less than 250,000 as of J anuary 1, 2019, any city within that line 33 county, or a city with a population of less than 25,000 as of line 34 January 1, 2019.
line 35 (g)  The Legislature finds and declares that the lack of housing line 36 is a matter of state wide concern and is not a municipal af fair as line 37 that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California line 38 Constitution. Therefore, this section applies to all cities, including line 39 charter cities.
98 AB 748 — 5 —

7.a
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Assembly BIll 748 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to line 2 Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because line 3 a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service line 4 charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or line 5 level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section line 6 17556 of the Government Code.
line 7 SECTION 1. Section 90018 of the Financial Code is amended line 8 to read:
line 9 90018. (a)  The commissioner shall prepare and publish on the line 10 department’s internet website an annual report detailing the actions line 11 taken during the prior year under this law.
line 12 (b)  The report described in subdi vision (a) shall include, b ut line 13 not be limited to, information on actions taken with respect to all line 14 of the following:
line 15 (1)  Rulemaking, enforcement, oversight, consumer complaints line 16 and resolutions, education, and research.
line 17 (2)  The activities of the Financial Technology Innovation Office. line 18 (c)  The report may include recommendations, including those line 19 intended to result in improved oversight, greater transparency, or line 20 increased availability of beneficial financial products and services line 21 in the marketplace.
line 22
line 23
REVISIONS: line 24
Heading—Line 2. line 25
line 26
O
98 — 6 — AB 748

7.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Assembly BIll 748 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 4, 2026
california legislature—2025–26 regular session
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1621
Introduced by Assembly Member Wilson
(Coauthor: (Coauthors: Assembly Member Members Blanca Rubio and Wicks)
January 22, 2026
An act to amend Sections 65589.5 and 65913.3 of the Go vernment Code, relating to planning and zoning.
legislative counsel’s digest
AB 1621, as amended, Wilson. Planning and Zoning La w:
postentitlement phase permits: Housing Accountability Act. (1) The Planning and Zoning La w requires a local agenc y or state agency to compile one or more lists that specify in detail the information required from an y applicant for a postentitlement phase permit, as defined. Existing law also establishes time limits for completing reviews regarding whether an application for a postentitlement phase permit is complete and compliant, and whether to approve or deny an application.

Existing law requires the time limits to be tolled, if the local agency or state agency requires re view of the application by an outside entity , until the outside entity completes the review and returns the application, as specified.

This bill would prohibit a local agency or state agency from requiring or requesting more than 2 plan check and specification re views in connection with an application for a b uilding permit, as part of its review, except as specified. The bill would authorize a local agency or state agency to deny an application that is not compliant with the permit standards following 2 plan check and specification re views. The bill

98 7.b
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) would also authorize an applicant to request additional submittals of applications that are not compliant with the permit standards. The bill, if a local agenc y or state agenc y finds that a complete application is noncompliant, w ould prohibit a local agenc y or state agenc y from requesting or requiring any action or inaction as a result of a b uilding inspection undertaken to assess compliance with the applicable building permit standards that w ould represent a de viation from a pre viously approved b uilding plan or similar appro val for the b uilding permit, except as specified.

This bill w ould remo ve the abo ve-described tolling requirements relating to outside entity reviews and, instead, would require, if federal or state law requires review of the application by another public agency that is independent of the local agency or state agency before the local agency or state agency is authorized to act on the application, the time limits to be tolled for the application until the public agency completes the review and returns the application to the local agency or state agency.

The bill w ould require the local agenc y or state agenc y to notify the applicant of the tolling, as specified.
(2) Existing law, if a postentitlement phase permit is determined to be incomplete or noncompliant, requires a local agency or state agency to provide a process for an applicant to appeal that decision in writing to the governing body of the agency or, if there is no governing body, to the director of the agency, as provided by that agency. Existing law requires the city or county to pro vide that the right of appeal is to the governing body or, at their option, the planning commission, or both.

Existing law requires a local agency or state agency to provide a final written determination on the appeal not later than 60 business days after receipt of the applicant’ s written appeal, for housing de velopment projects with 25 units or fewer, and not later than 90 business days for a housing de velopment projects with 26 units or more. Existing la w also specifies that the f act that an appeal is permitted to both the planning commission and to the go verning body does not e xtend the specified time period.

This bill w ould revise those timelines to not later than 30 b usiness days for housing development projects with 25 units or fe wer and 45 business days for housing development projects with 26 units or more.

The bill would remove the specification that the f act that an appeal is permitted to both the planning commission and to the governing body does not extend the specified time period. The bill would remove the requirement that, if a postentitlement phase permit is determined to be 98 — 2 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) incomplete or noncompliant, a local agenc y or state agency provide a process for an applicant to appeal that decision to the director of the agency if there is no governing body, as provided by that agency. The bill would remove the requirement that a city or county pro vide that the right of appeal is to the go verning body or , at their option, the planning commission, or both.

This bill would authorize the applicant to seek a writ of mandate to compel approval of the application, if the applicant’s appeal is denied, or a decision on the appeal is not made within the timelines pro vided, or an appeals process is not provided as required.

By imposing additional duties on local agencies re garding postentitlement phase permits, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3) Existing law, the Housing Accountability Act, among other things, prohibits a local agenc y from disapproving, or conditioning appro val in a manner that renders infeasible, a housing development project for very low, low-, or moderate-income households unless the local agency makes written findings as to one of certain sets of conditions, as specified. The act also requires, when a proposed housing development project complies with applicable, objecti ve general plan, zoning, and subdivision standards and criteria in effect at the time that the application was deemed complete, but the local agency proposes to disapprove the project or to impose a condition that the project be developed at a lower density, that the local agency base its decision regarding the proposed housing de velopment project upon written findings supported by a preponderance of the evidence on the record that 2 specified conditions exist. Existing la w defines the term “disappro ve the housing development project” for these purposes to include an y instance in which a local agency takes certain actions or fails to comply with certain requirements, including the time limits described abo ve. Existing law makes a local agency’s failure to meet the above-described time limits relating to postentitlement phase permits a violation of the Housing Accountability Act.

This bill w ould, instead, mak e a violation of the abo ve-described provisions relating to postentitlement phase permits, among others, a violation of the Housing Accountability Act. The bill would also revise the definition of “disapprove the housing development project” under the Housing Accountability Act to include any instance in which a local agency f ails to comply with an y of the pro visions described abo ve relating to postentitlement phase permits. By requiring local agencies 98 AB 1621 — 3 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) to take certain actions, this bill w ould impose a state-mandated local program.
(4) The bill would make other conforming changes and would provide that certain changes are declaratory of existing law.
(5) The bill w ould include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.

Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
line 1 SECTION 1. Section 65589.5 of the Government Code is line 2 amended to read:
line 3 65589.5. (a)  (1)  The Legislature finds and declares all of the line 4 following:
line 5 (A)  The lack of housing, including emer gency shelters, is a line 6 critical problem that threatens the economic, en vironmental, and line 7 social quality of life in California.
line 8 (B)  California housing has become the most e xpensive in the line 9 nation. The excessive cost of the state’s housing supply is partially line 10 caused by activities and policies of many local governments that line 11 limit the approval of housing, increase the cost of land for housing, line 12 and require that high fees and e xactions be paid by producers of line 13 housing.
line 14 (C)  Among the consequences of those actions are discrimination line 15 against low-income and minority households, lack of housing to line 16 support emplo yment gro wth, imbalance in jobs and housing, line 17 reduced mobility, urban spra wl, e xcessive commuting, and air line 18 quality deterioration.
line 19 (D)  Many local governments do not give adequate attention to line 20 the economic, en vironmental, and social costs of decisions that line 21 result in disapproval of housing development projects, reduction line 22 in density of housing projects, and excessive standards for housing line 23 development projects.
98 — 4 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (2)  In enacting the amendments made to this section by the act line 2 adding this paragraph, the Le gislature further finds and declares line 3 the following:
line 4 (A)  California has a housing supply and af fordability crisis of line 5 historic proportions. The consequences of f ailing to ef fectively line 6 and aggressi vely confront this crisis are hurting millions of line 7 Californians, robbing future generations of the chance to call line 8 California home, stifling economic opportunities for workers and line 9 businesses, worsening poverty and homelessness, and undermining line 10 the state’s environmental and climate objectives. line 11 (B)  While the causes of this crisis are multiple and comple x, line 12 the absence of meaningful and ef fective polic y reforms to line 13 significantly enhance the approval and supply of housing affordable line 14 to Californians of all income levels is a key factor. line 15 (C)  The crisis has gro wn so acute in California that supply , line 16 demand, and affordability fundamentals are characterized in the line 17 negative: underserved demands, constrained supply, and protracted line 18 unaffordability.
line 19 (D)  According to reports and data, California has accumulated line 20 an unmet housing backlog of nearly 2,000,000 units and must line 21 provide for at least 180,000 new units annually to keep pace with line 22 growth through 2025.
line 23 (E)  California’s o verall home o wnership rate is at its lo west line 24 level since the 1940s. The state ranks 49th out of the 50 states in line 25 home ownership rates as well as in the supply of housing per capita. line 26 Only one-half of California’ s households are able to af ford the line 27 cost of housing in their local regions.
line 28 (F)  Lack of supply and rising costs are compounding inequality line 29 and limiting advancement opportunities for many Californians. line 30 (G)  The majority of California renters, more than 3,000,000 line 31 households, pay more than 30 percent of their income toward rent line 32 and nearly one-third, more than 1,500,000 households, pay more line 33 than 50 percent of their income toward rent.
line 34 (H)  When Californians ha ve access to safe and af fordable line 35 housing, they have more money for food and health care; they are line 36 less lik ely to become homeless and in need of
line 37 government-subsidized services; their children do better in school; line 38 and b usinesses ha ve an easier time recruiting and retaining line 39 employees.
98 AB 1621 — 5 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (I)  An additional consequence of the state’s cumulative housing line 2 shortage is a significant increase in greenhouse g as emissions line 3 caused by the displacement and redirection of populations to states line 4 with greater housing opportunities, particularly w orking- and line 5 middle-class households. California’s cumulative housing shortfall line 6 therefore has not only national b ut international en vironmental line 7 consequences.
line 8 (J)  California’s housing picture has reached a crisis of historic line 9 proportions despite the fact that, for decades, the Legislature has line 10 enacted numerous statutes intended to significantly increase the line 11 approval, development, and affordability of housing for all income line 12 levels, including this section.
line 13 (K)  The Legislature’s intent in enacting this section in 1982 and line 14 in expanding its provisions since then was to significantly increase line 15 the approval and construction of ne w housing for all economic line 16 segments of California’ s communities by meaningfully and line 17 effectively curbing the capability of local go vernments to den y, line 18 reduce the density for, or render infeasible housing de velopment line 19 projects and emergency shelters. That intent has not been fulfilled. line 20 (L)  It is the polic y of the state that this section be interpreted line 21 and implemented in a manner to afford the fullest possible weight line 22 to the interest of, and the approval and provision of, housing. line 23 (3)  It is the intent of the Le gislature that the conditions that line 24 would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and line 25 safety, as described in paragraph (2) of subdi vision (d) and line 26 paragraph (1) of subdivision (j), arise infrequently. line 27 (4)  It is the intent of the Le gislature that the amendments line 28 removing provisions from subparagraphs (D) and (E) of paragraph line 29 (6) of subdi vision (h) and adding those pro visions to Sections line 30 65589.5.1 and 65589.5.2 by Assembly Bill 1413 (2023), insof ar line 31 as the y are substantially the same as e xisting la w, shall be line 32 considered restatements and continuations of existing law, and not line 33 new enactments.
line 34 (b)  It is the policy of the state that a local government not reject line 35 or mak e infeasible housing de velopment projects, including line 36 emergency shelters, that contribute to meeting the need determined line 37 pursuant to this article without a thorough analysis of the economic, line 38 social, and en vironmental ef fects of the action and without line 39 complying with subdivision (d).
98 — 6 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (c) The Le gislature also recognizes that premature and line 2 unnecessary de velopment of agricultural lands for urban uses line 3 continues to have adverse effects on the availability of those lands line 4 for food and fiber production and on the economy of the state. line 5 Furthermore, it is the policy of the state that development should line 6 be guided a way from prime agricultural lands; therefore, in line 7 implementing this section, local jurisdictions should encourage, line 8 to the maximum extent practicable, in filling existing urban areas. line 9 (d) For a housing de velopment project for v ery low, low-, or line 10 moderate-income households, or an emer gency shelter, a local line 11 agency shall not disappro ve the housing de velopment project or line 12 emergency shelter, or condition approval in a manner that renders line 13 the housing development project or emergency shelter infeasible, line 14 including through the use of design re view standards, unless it line 15 makes written findings, based upon a preponderance of the line 16 evidence in the record, as to one of the following:
line 17 (1) The jurisdiction has adopted a housing element pursuant to line 18 this article that has been revised in accordance with Section 65588, line 19 is in substantial compliance with this article, and the jurisdiction line 20 has met or e xceeded its share of the re gional housing need line 21 allocation pursuant to Section 65584 for the planning period for line 22 the income category proposed for the housing development project, line 23 provided that any disapproval or conditional approval shall not be line 24 based on any of the reasons prohibited by Section 65008. If the line 25 housing development project includes a mix of income categories, line 26 and the jurisdiction has not met or exceeded its share of the regional line 27 housing need for one or more of those cate gories, then this line 28 paragraph shall not be used to disapprove or conditionally approve line 29 the housing development project. The share of the regional housing line 30 need met by the jurisdiction shall be calculated consistently with line 31 the forms and definitions that may be adopted by the Department line 32 of Housing and Community De velopment pursuant to Section line 33 65400. In the case of an emer gency shelter, the jurisdiction shall line 34 have met or exceeded the need for emergency shelter, as identified line 35 pursuant to paragraph (7) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583. Any line 36 disapproval or conditional appro val pursuant to this paragraph line 37 shall be in accordance with applicable law, rule, or standards. line 38 (2) The housing development project or emer gency shelter as line 39 proposed would have a specific, adv erse impact upon the public line 40 health or safety, and there is no feasible method to satisf actorily 98 AB 1621 — 7 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 mitigate or avoid the specific, adv erse impact without rendering line 2 the de velopment unaf fordable to lo w- and moderate-income line 3 households or rendering the development of the emergency shelter line 4 financially infeasible. As used in this paragraph, a “specific, line 5 adverse impact” means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and line 6 unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public line 7 health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as the y existed line 8 on the date the application was deemed complete. The following line 9 shall not constitute a specific, adv erse impact upon the public line 10 health or safety:
line 11 (A)  Inconsistency with the zoning ordinance or general plan line 12 land use designation.
line 13 (B)  The eligibility to claim a welf are e xemption under line 14 subdivision (g) of Section 214 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. line 15 (3)  The denial of the housing development project or imposition line 16 of conditions is required in order to comply with specific state or line 17 federal law, and there is no feasible method to comply without line 18 rendering the de velopment unaf fordable to lo w- and line 19 moderate-income households or rendering the development of the line 20 emergency shelter financially infeasible.
line 21 (4)  The housing de velopment project or emer gency shelter is line 22 proposed on land zoned for agriculture or resource preserv ation line 23 that is surrounded on at least tw o sides by land being used for line 24 agricultural or resource preservation purposes, or which does not line 25 have adequate water or wastewater facilities to serve the project. line 26 (5)  On the date an application for the housing de velopment line 27 project or emergency shelter was deemed complete, the jurisdiction line 28 had adopted a re vised housing element that w as in substantial line 29 compliance with this article, and the housing development project line 30 or emergency shelter was inconsistent with both the jurisdiction’s line 31 zoning ordinance and general plan land use designation as specified line 32 in any element of the general plan.
line 33 (A)  This paragraph shall not be utilized to disappro ve or line 34 conditionally approve a housing development project proposed on line 35 a site, including a candidate site for rezoning, that is identified as line 36 suitable or a vailable for v ery lo w, lo w-, or moderate-income line 37 households in the jurisdiction’ s housing element if the housing line 38 development project is consistent with the density specified in the line 39 housing element, e ven though the housing de velopment project line 40 was inconsistent with both the jurisdiction’s zoning ordinance and 98 — 8 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 general plan land use designation on the date the application was line 2 deemed complete.
line 3 (B) If the local agenc y has f ailed to identify a zone or zones line 4 where emergency shelters are allowed as a permitted use without line 5 a conditional use or other discretionary permit, has f ailed to line 6 demonstrate that the identified zone or zones include sufficient line 7 capacity to accommodate the need for emergency shelter identified line 8 in paragraph (7) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, or has failed line 9 to demonstrate that the identified zone or zones can accommodate line 10 at least one emer gency shelter, as required by paragraph (4) of line 11 subdivision (a) of Section 65583, then this paragraph shall not be line 12 utilized to disappro ve or conditionally appro ve an emer gency line 13 shelter proposed for a site designated in any element of the general line 14 plan for industrial, commercial, or multifamily residential uses. In line 15 any action in court, the burden of proof shall be on the local agency line 16 to show that its housing element does satisfy the requirements of line 17 paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583. line 18 (6) On the date an application for the housing de velopment line 19 project or emergency shelter was deemed complete, the jurisdiction line 20 did not ha ve an adopted re vised housing element that w as in line 21 substantial compliance with this article and the housing line 22 development project is not a builder’s remedy project. line 23 (e) Nothing in this section shall be construed to relieve the local line 24 agency from complying with the congestion management program line 25 required by Chapter 2.6 (commencing with Section 65088) or the line 26 California Coastal Act of 1976 (Di vision 20 (commencing with line 27 Section 30000) of the Public Resources Code). Neither shall line 28 anything in this section be construed to relie ve the local agenc y line 29 from making one or more of the findings required pursuant to line 30 Section 21081 of the Public Resources Code or otherwise line 31 complying with the California Environmental Quality Act (Division line 32 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources line 33 Code).
line 34 (f) (1) Except as pro vided in paragraphs (6) and (8), and line 35 subdivision (o), nothing in this section shall be construed to line 36 prohibit a local agenc y from requiring the housing de velopment line 37 project to comply with objective, quantifiable, written development line 38 standards, conditions, and policies appropriate to, and consistent line 39 with, meeting the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need line 40 pursuant to Section 65584. However, the development standards, 98 AB 1621 — 9 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 conditions, and policies shall be applied to f acilitate and line 2 accommodate development at the density permitted on the site and line 3 proposed by the development. Nothing in this section shall limit line 4 a project’s eligibility for a density bonus, incentive, or concession, line 5 or waiver or reduction of development standards and parking ratios, line 6 pursuant to Section 65915.
line 7 (2)  Except as provided in subdivision (o), nothing in this section line 8 shall be construed to prohibit a local agenc y from requiring an line 9 emergency shelter project to comply with objective, quantifiable, line 10 written development standards, conditions, and policies that are line 11 consistent with paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583 line 12 and appropriate to, and consistent with, meeting the jurisdiction’s line 13 need for emer gency shelter, as identified pursuant to paragraph line 14 (7) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583. However, the development line 15 standards, conditions, and policies shall be applied by the local line 16 agency to f acilitate and accommodate the de velopment of the line 17 emergency shelter project.
line 18 (3)  Except as provided in subdivision (o), nothing in this section line 19 shall be construed to prohibit a local agenc y from imposing fees line 20 and other exactions otherwise authorized by law that are essential line 21 to provide necessary public services and f acilities to the housing line 22 development project or emergency shelter.
line 23 (4)  For purposes of this section, a housing development project line 24 or emergency shelter shall be deemed consistent, compliant, and line 25 in conformity with an applicable plan, program, policy, ordinance, line 26 standard, requirement, or other similar pro vision if there is line 27 substantial e vidence that w ould allo w a reasonable person to line 28 conclude that the housing de velopment project or emer gency line 29 shelter is consistent, compliant, or in conformity. line 30 (5)  For purposes of this section, a change to the zoning ordinance line 31 or general plan land use designation subsequent to the date the line 32 application was deemed complete shall not constitute a valid basis line 33 to disapprove or condition appro val of the housing de velopment line 34 project or emergency shelter.
line 35 (6)  Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive, all of the line 36 following apply to a housing development project that is a builder’s line 37 remedy project:
line 38 (A)  A local agency may only require the project to comply with line 39 the objecti ve, quantifiable, written de velopment standards, line 40 conditions, and policies that would have applied to the project had 98 — 10 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 it been proposed on a site with a general plan designation and line 2 zoning classification that allow the density and unit type proposed line 3 by the applicant. If the local agency has no general plan designation line 4 or zoning classification that w ould have allowed the density and line 5 unit type proposed by the applicant, the de velopment proponent line 6 may identify an y objecti ve, quantifiable, written de velopment line 7 standards, conditions, and policies associated with a dif ferent line 8 general plan designation or zoning classification within that line 9 jurisdiction, that facilitate the project’s density and unit type, and line 10 those shall apply.
line 11 (B)  (i)  Except as authorized by paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, line 12 of subdivision (d), a local agenc y shall not apply an y individual line 13 or combination of objecti ve, quantifiable, written de velopment line 14 standards, conditions, and policies to the project that do any of the line 15 following:
line 16 (I)  Render the project infeasible.
line 17 (II)  Preclude a project that meets the requirements allo wed to line 18 be imposed by subparagraph (A), as modified by any density bonus, line 19 incentive, or concession, or w aiver or reduction of de velopment line 20 standards and parking ratios, pursuant to Section 65915, from line 21 being constructed as proposed by the applicant. line 22 (ii)  The local agency shall bear the burden of proof of complying line 23 with clause (i).
line 24 (C)  (i)  A project applicant that qualifies for a density bonus line 25 pursuant to Section 65915 shall recei ve tw o incenti ves or line 26 concessions in addition to those granted pursuant to paragraph (2) line 27 of subdivision (d) of Section 65915.
line 28 (ii)  For a project seeking density bonuses, incenti ves, line 29 concessions, or any other benefits pursuant to Section 65915, and line 30 notwithstanding paragraph (6) of subdivision (o) of Section 65915, line 31 for purposes of this paragraph, maximum allo wable residential line 32 density or base density means the density permitted for a builder’s line 33 remedy project pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (11) of line 34 subdivision (h).
line 35 (iii)  A local agency shall grant an y density bonus pursuant to line 36 Section 65915 based on the number of units proposed and line 37 allowable pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (11) of line 38 subdivision (h).
line 39 (iv)  A project that dedicates units to e xtremely lo w income line 40 households pursuant to subclause (I) of clause (i) of subparagraph 98 AB 1621 — 11 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (C) of paragraph (3) of subdi vision (h) shall be eligible for the line 2 same density bonus, incenti ves or concessions, and w aivers or line 3 reductions of de velopment standards as pro vided to a housing line 4 development project that dedicates three percentage points more line 5 units to very low income households pursuant to paragraph (2) of line 6 subdivision (f) of Section 65915.
line 7 (v)  All units dedicated to e xtremely lo w income, v ery lo w line 8 income, low-income, and moderate-income households pursuant line 9 to paragraph (11) of subdivision (h) shall be counted as affordable line 10 units in determining whether the applicant qualifies for a density line 11 bonus pursuant to Section 65915.
line 12 (D)  (i)  The project shall not be required to apply for, or receive line 13 approval of, a general plan amendment, specific plan amendment, line 14 rezoning, or other legislative approval.
line 15 (ii)  The project shall not be required to apply for , or recei ve, line 16 any approval or permit not generally required of a project of the line 17 same type and density proposed by the applicant. line 18 (iii)  Any project that complies with this paragraph shall be line 19 deemed consistent, compliant, and in conformity with an applicable line 20 plan, program, polic y, ordinance, standard, requirement, line 21 redevelopment plan and implementing instruments, or other similar line 22 provision for all purposes, and shall not be considered or treated line 23 as a nonconforming lot, use, or structure for any purpose. line 24 (E)  A local agency shall not adopt or impose any requirement, line 25 process, practice, or procedure or undertake any course of conduct, line 26 including, but not limited to, increased fees or inclusionary housing line 27 requirements, that applies to a project solely or partially on the line 28 basis that the project is a builder’s remedy project. line 29 (F)  (i)  A b uilder’s remedy project shall be deemed to be in line 30 compliance with the residential density standards for the purposes line 31 of complying with subdivision (b) of Section 65912.123. line 32 (ii)  A b uilder’s remedy project shall be deemed to be in line 33 compliance with the objecti ve zoning standards, objecti ve line 34 subdivision standards, and objective design review standards for line 35 the purposes of complying with paragraph (5) of subdi vision (a) line 36 of Section 65913.4.
line 37 (G)  (i)  (I)  If the local agenc y had a local af fordable housing line 38 requirement, as defined in Section 65912.101, that on January 1, line 39 2024, required a greater percentage of af fordable units than line 40 required under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (11) of subdivision 98 — 12 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (h), or required an affordability level deeper than what is required line 2 under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (11) of subdivision (h), then, line 3 except as pro vided in subclauses (II) and (III), the local agenc y line 4 may require a housing development for mixed-income households line 5 to comply with an otherwise lawfully applicable local affordability line 6 percentage or affordability level. The local agency shall not require line 7 housing for mixed-income households to comply with an y other line 8 aspect of the local affordable housing requirement. line 9 (II)  Notwithstanding subclause (I), the local affordable housing line 10 requirements shall not be applied to require housing for line 11 mixed-income households to dedicate more than 20 percent of the line 12 units to affordable units of any kind.
line 13 (III)  Housing for mixed-income households that is required to line 14 dedicate 20 percent of the units to af fordable units shall not be line 15 required to dedicate any of the affordable units at an income level line 16 deeper than lo wer income households, as defined in Section line 17 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
line 18 (IV)  A local agency may only require housing for mixed-income line 19 households to comply with the local percentage requirement or line 20 affordability level described in subclause (I) if it first makes written line 21 findings, supported by a preponderance of e vidence, that line 22 compliance with the local percentage requirement or the line 23 affordability le vel, or both, w ould not render the housing line 24 development project infeasible. If a reasonable person could find line 25 compliance with either requirement, either alone or in combination, line 26 would render the project infeasible, the project shall not be required line 27 to comply with that requirement.
line 28 (ii)  Affordable units in the de velopment project shall ha ve a line 29 comparable bedroom and bathroom count as the market rate units. line 30 (iii)  Each affordable unit dedicated pursuant to this subparagraph line 31 shall count to ward satisfying a local af fordable housing line 32 requirement. Each af fordable unit dedicated pursuant to a local line 33 affordable housing requirement that meets the criteria established line 34 in this subparagraph shall count towards satisfying the requirements line 35 of this subparagraph. This is declaratory of existing law. line 36 (7)  (A)  For a housing de velopment project application that is line 37 deemed complete before January 1, 2025, the de velopment line 38 proponent for the project may choose to be subject to the provisions line 39 of this section that were in place on the date the preliminary line 40 application was submitted, or, if the project meets the definition 98 AB 1621 — 13 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 of a builder’s remedy project, it may choose to be subject to an y line 2 or all of the provisions of this section applicable as of January 1, line 3 2025.
line 4 (B)  Notwithstanding subdivision (c) of Section 65941.1, for a line 5 housing development project deemed complete before January 1, line 6 2025, the de velopment proponent may choose to re vise their line 7 application so that the project is a builder’s remedy project, without line 8 being required to resubmit a preliminary application, e ven if the line 9 revision results in the number of residential units or square footage line 10 of construction changing by 20 percent or more. line 11 (8)  A housing de velopment project proposed on a site that is line 12 identified as suitable or a vailable for v ery lo w, lo w-, or line 13 moderate-income households in the jurisdiction’s housing element, line 14 that is consistent with the density specified in the most recently line 15 updated and adopted housing element, and that is inconsistent with line 16 both the jurisdiction’s zoning ordinance and general plan land use line 17 designation on the date the application was deemed complete, shall line 18 be subject to the provisions of subparagraphs (A), (B), and (D) of line 19 paragraph (6) and paragraph (9).
line 20 (9)  For purposes of this subdi vision, “objective, quantifiable, line 21 written development standards, conditions, and policies” means line 22 criteria that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public line 23 official and are uniformly v erifiable by reference to an e xternal line 24 and uniform benchmark or criterion a vailable and kno wable by line 25 both the development applicant or proponent and the public official line 26 before submittal, including, b ut not limited to, an y standard, line 27 ordinance, or policy described in paragraph (4) of subdivision (o). line 28 Nothing herein shall af fect the oblig ation of the housing line 29 development project to comply with the minimum b uilding line 30 standards appro ved by the California Building Standards line 31 Commission as pro vided in P art 2.5 (commencing with Section line 32 18901) of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code. In the event line 33 that applicable objecti ve, quantifiable, written de velopment line 34 standards, conditions, and policies are mutually inconsistent, a line 35 development shall be deemed consistent with the criteria that line 36 permits the density and unit type closest to that of the proposed line 37 project.
line 38 (g)  This section shall be applicable to charter cities because the line 39 Legislature finds that the lack of housing, including emer gency line 40 shelter, is a critical statewide problem.
98 — 14 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (h)  The follo wing definitions apply for the purposes of this line 2 section:
line 3 (1)  “Feasible” means capable of being accomplished in a line 4 successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into line 5 account economic, environmental, social, and technological factors. line 6 (2)  “Housing development project” means a use consisting of line 7 any of the following:
line 8 (A)  Residential units only.
line 9 (B)  Mixed-use de velopments consisting of residential and line 10 nonresidential uses that meet any of the following conditions:
line 11 (i)  A mixed-use development that meets both of the following:
line 12 (I)  At least two-thirds of the ne w or converted square footage line 13 is designated for residential use.
line 14 (II)  (ia)  No portion of the project is designated for use as a line 15 hotel, motel, bed and breakfast inn, or other transient lodging. line 16 (ib)  (Ia)  Notwithstanding sub-subclause (ia), if a mix ed-use line 17 project as defined in this paragraph includes a hotel, motel, bed line 18 and breakfast inn, or other transient lodging, the portion of the line 19 mixed-use project which does not include a hotel, motel, bed and line 20 breakfast inn, or other transient lodging shall be considered a line 21 housing development project.
line 22 (Ib)  The local agency may separately approve the portion of the line 23 project that includes a hotel, motel, bed and breakfast inn, or other line 24 transient lodging, which shall not be eligible for an y benefits line 25 conferred on a housing development project by state law, including, line 26 but not limited to, those available to a development under Section line 27 65913.4.
line 28 (ic)  For purposes of this subclause, the term “other transient line 29 lodging” does not include either of the following:
line 30 (Ia)  A residential hotel, as defined in Section 50519 of the Health line 31 and Safety Code.
line 32 (Ib)  After the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, a resident’s line 33 use or mark eting of a unit as short-term lodging, as defined in line 34 Section 17568.8 of the Business and Professions Code, in a manner line 35 consistent with local law.
line 36 (ii)  At least 50 percent of the new or converted square footage line 37 is designated for residential use and the project meets both of the line 38 following:
line 39 (I)  The project includes at least 500 net new residential units. 98 AB 1621 — 15 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (II)  No portion of the project is designated for use as a hotel, line 2 motel, bed and breakfast inn, or other transient lodging, except a line 3 portion of the project may be designated for use as a residential line 4 hotel, as defined in Section 50519 of the Health and Safety Code. line 5 (iii)  At least 50 percent of the net ne w or con verted square line 6 footage is designated for residential use and the project meets all line 7 of the following:
line 8 (I)  The project includes at least 500 net new residential units. line 9 (II)  The project involves the demolition or conversion of at least line 10 100,000 square feet of nonresidential use.
line 11 (III)  The project demolishes at least 50 percent of the e xisting line 12 nonresidential uses on the site.
line 13 (IV)  No portion of the project is designated for use as a hotel, line 14 motel, bed and breakfast inn, or other transient lodging, except a line 15 portion of the project may be designated for use as a residential line 16 hotel, as defined in Section 50519 of the Health and Safety Code. line 17 (C)  Transitional housing or supportive housing. line 18 (D)  Farmworker housing, as defined in subdi vision (h) of line 19 Section 50199.7 of the Health and Safety Code.
line 20 (3)  (A)  “Housing for v ery lo w, lo w-, or moderate-income line 21 households” means housing for lo wer income households, line 22 mixed-income households, or moderate-income households. line 23 (B)  “Housing for lower income households” means a housing line 24 development project in which 100 percent of the units, excluding line 25 managers’ units, are dedicated to lo wer income households, as line 26 defined in Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code, at an line 27 affordable cost, as defined by Section 50052.5 of the Health and line 28 Safety Code, or an affordable rent set in an amount consistent with line 29 the rent limits established by the California Tax Credit Allocation line 30 Committee. The units shall be subject to a recorded deed restriction line 31 for a period of 55 years for rental units and 45 years for line 32 owner-occupied units.
line 33 (C)  (i)  “Housing for mixed-income households” means any of line 34 the following:
line 35 (I)  A housing development project in which at least 7 percent line 36 of the total units, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (9) line 37 of subdivision (o) of Section 65915, are dedicated to e xtremely line 38 low income households, as defined in Section 50106 of the Health line 39 and Safety Code.
98 — 16 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (II)  A housing development project in which at least 10 percent line 2 of the total units, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (9) line 3 of subdivision (o) of Section 65915, are dedicated to v ery low line 4 income households, as defined in Section 50105 of the Health and line 5 Safety Code.
line 6 (III)  A housing development project in which at least 13 percent line 7 of the total units, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (9) line 8 of subdivision (o) of Section 65915, are dedicated to lower income line 9 households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety line 10 Code.
line 11 (IV)  A housing development project in which there are 10 or line 12 fewer total units, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (9) line 13 of subdivision (o) of Section 65915, that is on a site that is smaller line 14 than one acre, and that is proposed for development at a minimum line 15 density of 10 units per acre.
line 16 (ii)  All units dedicated to e xtremely lo w income, v ery lo w line 17 income, and low-income households pursuant to clause (i) shall line 18 meet both of the following:
line 19 (I)  The units shall have an affordable housing cost, as defined line 20 in Section 50052.5 of the Health and Safety Code, or an affordable line 21 rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the Health and Safety Code. line 22 (II)  The development proponent shall agree to, and the local line 23 agency shall ensure, the continued af fordability of all affordable line 24 rental units included pursuant to this section for 55 years and all line 25 affordable ownership units included pursuant to this section for a line 26 period of 45 years.
line 27 (D)  “Housing for moderate-income households” means a line 28 housing development project in which 100 percent of the units are line 29 sold or rented to moderate-income households, as defined in line 30 Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, at an af fordable line 31 housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the Health and line 32 Safety Code, or an affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of line 33 the Health and Safety Code. The units shall be subject to a recorded line 34 deed restriction for a period of 55 years for rental units and 45 line 35 years for owner-occupied units.
line 36 (4)  “Area median income” means area median income as line 37 periodically established by the Department of Housing and line 38 Community Development pursuant to Section 50093 of the Health line 39 and Safety Code.
98 AB 1621 — 17 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (5)  Notwithstanding any other law, “deemed complete” means line 2 that the applicant has submitted a preliminary application pursuant line 3 to Section 65941.1 or , if the applicant has not submitted a line 4 preliminary application, has submitted a complete application line 5 pursuant to Section 65943. The local agency shall bear the burden line 6 of proof in establishing that the application is not complete. line 7 (6)  “Disapprove the housing development project” includes any line 8 instance in which a local agency does any of the following:
line 9 (A)  Votes or tak es final administrati ve action on a proposed line 10 housing development project application and the application is line 11 disapproved, including an y required land use appro vals or line 12 entitlements necessary for the issuance of a building permit. line 13 (B)  Fails to comply with the time periods specified in line 14 subdivision (a) of Section 65950. An extension of time pursuant line 15 to Article 5 (commencing with Section 65950) of Chapter 4.5 shall line 16 be deemed to be an extension of time pursuant to this paragraph. line 17 (C)  Fails to comply with subdi visions (b) to (e), inclusi ve, of line 18 Section 65913.3.
line 19 (D)  Fails to meet the time limit specified in Section 17970.3 of line 20 the Health and Safety Code.
line 21 (E)  Fails to cease a course of conduct undertak en for an line 22 improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay line 23 or needless increases in the cost of the proposed housing line 24 development project, that ef fectively disappro ves the proposed line 25 housing development without taking final administrative action if line 26 all of the following conditions are met:
line 27 (i)  The project applicant pro vides written notice detailing the line 28 challenged conduct and why it constitutes disapproval to the local line 29 agency established under Section 65100.
line 30 (ii)  Within five working days of receiving the applicant’s written line 31 notice described in clause (i), the local agency shall post the notice line 32 on the local agency’s internet website, provide a copy of the notice line 33 to any person who has made a written request for notices pursuant line 34 to subdivision (f) of Section 21167 of the Public Resources Code, line 35 and file the notice with the county clerk of each county in which line 36 the project will be located. The county clerk shall post the notice line 37 and make it available for public inspection in the manner set forth line 38 in subdivision (c) of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. line 39 (iii)  The local agency shall consider all objections, comments, line 40 evidence, and concerns about the project or the applicant’s written 98 — 18 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 notice and shall not mak e a determination until at least 60 days line 2 after the applicant has gi ven written notice to the local agenc y line 3 pursuant to clause (i).
line 4 (iv)  Within 90 days of receipt of the applicant’s written notice line 5 described in clause (i), the local agenc y shall issue a written line 6 statement that it will immediately cease the challenged conduct or line 7 issue written findings that comply with both of the follo wing line 8 requirements:
line 9 (I)  The findings articulate an objecti ve basis for wh y the line 10 challenged course of conduct is necessary.
line 11 (II)  The findings provide clear instructions on what the applicant line 12 must submit or supplement so that the local agenc y can mak e a line 13 final determination re garding the ne xt necessary appro val or set line 14 the date and time of the next hearing.
line 15 (v)  (I)  If a local agenc y continues the challenged course of line 16 conduct described in the applicant’ s written notice and f ails to line 17 issue the written findings described in clause (iv), the local agency line 18 shall bear the burden of establishing that its course of conduct does line 19 not constitute a disappro val of the housing de velopment project line 20 under this subparagraph in an action taken by the applicant. line 21 (II)  If an applicant challenges a local agency’s course of conduct line 22 as a disapproval under this subparagraph, the local agency’s written line 23 findings described in clause (i v) shall be incorporated into the line 24 administrative record and be deemed to be the final administrative line 25 action for purposes of adjudicating whether the local agenc y’s line 26 course of conduct constitutes a disappro val of the housing line 27 development project under this subparagraph.
line 28 (vi)  A local agency’s action in furtherance of complying with line 29 the California En vironmental Quality Act (Di vision 13 line 30 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code), line 31 including, but not limited to, imposing mitigating measures, shall line 32 not constitute project disapproval under this subparagraph. line 33 (F)  Fails to comply with Section 65905.5. For purposes of this line 34 subparagraph, a b uilder’s remedy project shall be deemed to line 35 comply with the applicable, objecti ve general plan and zoning line 36 standards in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. line 37 (G)  (i)  Determines that an application for a housing line 38 development project is incomplete pursuant to subdi vision (a) or line 39 (b) of Section 65943 and includes in the determination an item line 40 that is not required on the local agenc y’s submittal requirement 98 AB 1621 — 19 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 checklist. The local agency shall bear the burden of proof that the line 2 required item is listed on the submittal requirement checklist. line 3 (ii)  In a subsequent review of an application pursuant to Section line 4 65943, requests the applicant pro vide new information that w as line 5 not identified in the initial determination and upholds this line 6 determination in the final written determination on an appeal filed line 7 pursuant to subdi vision (c) of Section 65943. The local agenc y line 8 shall bear the burden of proof that the required item was identified line 9 in the initial determination.
line 10 (iii)  Determines that an application for a housing development line 11 project is incomplete pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) of Section line 12 65943, a reasonable person would conclude that the applicant has line 13 submitted all of the items required on the local agency’s submittal line 14 requirement checklist, and the local agenc y upholds this line 15 determination in the final written determination on an appeal filed line 16 pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 65943.
line 17 (iv)  If a local agenc y determines that an application is line 18 incomplete under Section 65943 after tw o resubmittals of the line 19 application by the applicant, the local agency shall bear the burden line 20 of establishing that the determination is not an effective disapproval line 21 of a housing development project under this section. line 22 (H)  Violates subparagraph (D) or (E) of paragraph (6) of line 23 subdivision (f).
line 24 (I)  Makes a written determination that a preliminary application line 25 described in subdivision (a) of Section 65941.1 has expired or that line 26 the applicant has otherwise lost its v ested rights under the line 27 preliminary application for any reason other than those described line 28 in subdivisions (d) and (e) of Section 65941.1. line 29 (J)  (i)  Fails to make a determination of whether the project is line 30 exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Division line 31 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources line 32 Code), or commits an abuse of discretion, as defined in subdivision line 33 (b) of Section 65589.5.1 if all of the conditions in Section line 34 65589.5.1 are satisfied.
line 35 (ii)  This subparagraph shall become inoperative on January 1, line 36 2031.
line 37 (K)  (i)  Fails to adopt a ne gative declaration or addendum for line 38 the project, to certify an en vironmental impact report for the line 39 project, or to approve another comparable environmental document, line 40 such as a sustainable communities en vironmental assessment 98 — 20 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 pursuant to Section 21155.2 of the Public Resources Code, as line 2 required pursuant to the California En vironmental Quality Act line 3 (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public line 4 Resources Code), if all of the conditions in Section 65589.5.2 are line 5 satisfied.
line 6 (ii)  This subparagraph shall become inoperative on January 1, line 7 2031.
line 8 (7)  (A)  For purposes of this section and Sections 65589.5.1 and line 9 65589.5.2, “lawful determination” means any final decision about line 10 whether to appro ve or disappro ve a statutory or cate gorical line 11 exemption or a ne gative declaration, addendum, en vironmental line 12 impact report, or comparable en vironmental re view document line 13 under the California En vironmental Quality Act (Di vision 13 line 14 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code) line 15 that is not an abuse of discretion, as defined in subdivision (b) of line 16 Section 65589.5.1 or subdivision (b) of Section 65589.5.2. line 17 (B)  This paragraph shall become inoperative on January 1, 2031. line 18 (8)  “Lower density” includes any conditions that have the same line 19 effect or impact on the ability of the project to provide housing. line 20 (9)  “Objective” means in volving no personal or subjecti ve line 21 judgment by a public official and being uniformly v erifiable by line 22 reference to an e xternal and uniform benchmark or criterion line 23 available and kno wable by both the de velopment applicant or line 24 proponent and the public official.
line 25 (10)  Notwithstanding an y other la w, “determined to be line 26 complete” means that the applicant has submitted a complete line 27 application pursuant to Section 65943.
line 28 (11)  “Builder’s remedy project” means a project that meets all line 29 of the following criteria:
line 30 (A)  The project is a housing development project that provides line 31 housing for very low, low-, or moderate-income households. line 32 (B)  On or after the date an application for the housing line 33 development project or emergency shelter was deemed complete, line 34 the jurisdiction did not ha ve a housing element that w as in line 35 substantial compliance with this article.
line 36 (C)  The project has a density such that the number of units, as line 37 calculated before the application of a density bonus pursuant to line 38 Section 65915, complies with all of the following conditions:
line 39 (i)  The density does not e xceed the greatest of the follo wing line 40 densities:
98 AB 1621 — 21 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (I)  Fifty percent greater than the minimum density deemed line 2 appropriate to accommodate housing for that jurisdiction as line 3 specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) line 4 of Section 65583.2.
line 5 (II)  Three times the density allowed by the general plan, zoning line 6 ordinance, or state law, whichever is greater.
line 7 (III)  The density that is consistent with the density specified in line 8 the housing element.
line 9 (ii)  Notwithstanding clause (i), the greatest allo wable density line 10 shall be 35 units per acre more than the amount allowable pursuant line 11 to clause (i), if any portion of the site is located within any of the line 12 following:
line 13 (I)  One-half mile of a major transit stop, as defined in Section line 14 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code.
line 15 (II)  A very low vehicle travel area, as defined in subdi vision line 16 (b) of Section 65589.5.1.
line 17 (III)  A high or highest resource census tract, as identified by line 18 the latest edition of the “CTCA C/HCD Opportunity Map” line 19 published by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee and line 20 the Department of Housing and Community Development. line 21 (D)  (i)  On sites that have a minimum density requirement and line 22 are located within one-half mile of a commuter rail station or a line 23 heavy rail station, the density of the project shall not be less than line 24 the minimum density required on the site.
line 25 (I)  For purposes of this subparagraph, “commuter rail” means line 26 a railway that is not a light rail, streetcar, trolley, or tramway and line 27 that is for urban passenger train service consisting of local short line 28 distance travel operating between a central city and adjacent suburb line 29 with service operated on a regular basis by or under contract with line 30 a transit operator for the purpose of transporting passengers within line 31 urbanized areas, or between urbanized areas and outlying areas, line 32 using either locomotive-hauled or self-propelled railroad passenger line 33 cars, with multitrip tickets and specific station-to-station fares. line 34 (II)  For purposes of this subparagraph, “hea vy rail” means an line 35 electric railway with the capacity for a hea vy volume of traffic line 36 using high speed and rapid acceleration passenger rail cars line 37 operating singly or in multicar trains on fix ed rails, separate line 38 rights-of-way from which all other v ehicular and foot traffic are line 39 excluded, and high platform loading.
98 — 22 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (ii)  On all other sites with a minimum density requirement, the line 2 density of the project shall not be less than the local agenc y’s line 3 minimum density or one-half of the minimum density deemed line 4 appropriate to accommodate housing for that jurisdiction as line 5 specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) line 6 of Section 65583.2, whichever is lower.
line 7 (E)  The project site does not ab ut a site where more than line 8 one-third of the square footage on the site has been used, within line 9 the past three years, by a hea vy industrial use, or a Title V line 10 industrial use, as those terms are defined in Section 65913.16. line 11 (12)  “Condition approval” includes imposing on the housing line 12 development project, or attempting to subject it to, de velopment line 13 standards, conditions, or policies.
line 14 (13)  “Unit type” means the form of ownership and the kind of line 15 residential unit, including, b ut not limited to, single-f amily line 16 detached, single-f amily attached, for -sale, rental, multif amily, line 17 townhouse, condominium, apartment, manuf actured homes and line 18 mobilehomes, factory-built housing, and residential hotel. line 19 (14)  “Proposed by the applicant” means the plans and designs line 20 as submitted by the applicant, including, but not limited to, density, line 21 unit size, unit type, site plan, b uilding massing, floor area ratio, line 22 amenity areas, open space, parking, and ancillary commercial uses. line 23 (i)  If any city, county, or city and county denies appro val or line 24 imposes conditions, including design changes, lo wer density, or line 25 a reduction of the percentage of a lot that may be occupied by a line 26 building or structure under the applicable planning and zoning in line 27 force at the time the housing development project’s application is line 28 complete, that have a substantial adverse effect on the viability or line 29 affordability of a housing de velopment for v ery lo w, lo w-, or line 30 moderate-income households, and the denial of the de velopment line 31 or the imposition of conditions on the development is the subject line 32 of a court action which challenges the denial or the imposition of line 33 conditions, then the burden of proof shall be on the local legislative line 34 body to sho w that its decision is consistent with the findings as line 35 described in subdivision (d), and that the findings are supported line 36 by a preponderance of the e vidence in the record, and with the line 37 requirements of subdivision (o).
line 38 (j)  (1)  When a proposed housing development project complies line 39 with applicable, objecti ve general plan, zoning, and subdi vision line 40 standards and criteria, including design review standards, in effect 98 AB 1621 — 23 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 at the time that the application was deemed complete, but the local line 2 agency proposes to disapprove the project or to impose a condition line 3 that the project be developed at a lower density, the local agency line 4 shall base its decision regarding the proposed housing development line 5 project upon written findings supported by a preponderance of the line 6 evidence on the record that both of the following conditions exist:
line 7 (A)  The housing de velopment project w ould have a specific, line 8 adverse impact upon the public health or safety unless the project line 9 is disapproved or approved upon the condition that the project be line 10 developed at a lower density. As used in this paragraph, a “specific, line 11 adverse impact” means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and line 12 unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public line 13 health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as the y existed line 14 on the date the application was deemed complete. line 15 (B)  There is no feasible method to satisf actorily mitig ate or line 16 avoid the adverse impact identified pursuant to paragraph (1), other line 17 than the disappro val of the housing de velopment project or the line 18 approval of the project upon the condition that it be de veloped at line 19 a lower density.
line 20 (2)  (A)  If the local agenc y considers a proposed housing line 21 development project to be inconsistent, not in compliance, or not line 22 in conformity with an applicable plan, program, policy, ordinance, line 23 standard, requirement, or other similar pro vision as specified in line 24 this subdi vision, it shall pro vide the applicant with written line 25 documentation identifying the pro vision or pro visions, and an line 26 explanation of the reason or reasons it considers the housing line 27 development to be inconsistent, not in compliance, or not in line 28 conformity as follows:
line 29 (i)  Within 30 days of the date that the application for the housing line 30 development project is determined to be complete, if the housing line 31 development project contains 150 or fewer housing units. line 32 (ii)  Within 60 days of the date that the application for the line 33 housing development project is determined to be complete, if the line 34 housing development project contains more than 150 units. line 35 (B)  If the local agenc y f ails to pro vide the required line 36 documentation pursuant to subparagraph (A), the housing line 37 development project shall be deemed consistent, compliant, and line 38 in conformity with the applicable plan, program, policy, ordinance, line 39 standard, requirement, or other similar provision. 98 — 24 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (3)  For purposes of this section, the receipt of a density bonus, line 2 incentive, concession, w aiver, or reduction of de velopment line 3 standards pursuant to Section 65915 shall not constitute a v alid line 4 basis on which to find a proposed housing development project is line 5 inconsistent, not in compliance, or not in conformity , with an line 6 applicable plan, program, policy, ordinance, standard, requirement, line 7 or other similar provision specified in this subdivision. line 8 (4)  For purposes of this section, a proposed housing development line 9 project is not inconsistent with the applicable zoning standards line 10 and criteria, and shall not require a rezoning, if the housing line 11 development project is consistent with the objective general plan line 12 standards and criteria b ut the zoning for the project site is line 13 inconsistent with the general plan. If the local agency has complied line 14 with paragraph (2), the local agenc y may require the proposed line 15 housing de velopment project to comply with the objecti ve line 16 standards and criteria of the zoning which is consistent with the line 17 general plan, however, the standards and criteria shall be applied line 18 to facilitate and accommodate development at the density allowed line 19 on the site by the general plan and proposed by the proposed line 20 housing development project.
line 21 (k)  (1)  (A)  (i)  The applicant, a person who would be eligible line 22 to apply for residenc y in the housing de velopment project or line 23 emergency shelter, or a housing organization may bring an action line 24 to enforce this section. If, in an y action brought to enforce this line 25 section, a court finds that any of the following are met, the court line 26 shall issue an order pursuant to clause (ii):
line 27 (I)  The local agency, in violation of subdivision (d), disapproved line 28 a housing de velopment project or conditioned its appro val in a line 29 manner rendering it infeasible for the development of an emergency line 30 shelter, or housing for v ery lo w, lo w-, or moderate-income line 31 households, including f armworker housing, without making the line 32 findings required by this section.
line 33 (II)  The local agency, in violation of subdivision (j), disapproved line 34 a housing de velopment project complying with applicable, line 35 objective general plan and zoning standards and criteria, or imposed line 36 a condition that the project be developed at a lower density, without line 37 making the findings required by this section.
line 38 (III)  The local agency, in violation of subdivision (o), required line 39 or attempted to require a housing development project to comply 98 AB 1621 — 25 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 with an ordinance, polic y, or standard not adopted and in ef fect line 2 when a preliminary application was submitted.
line 3 (IV)  The local agenc y violated a pro vision of this section line 4 applicable to a builder’s remedy project.
line 5 (ii)  If the court finds that one of the conditions in clause (i) is line 6 met, the court shall issue an order or judgment compelling line 7 compliance with this section within a time period not to e xceed line 8 60 days, including, but not limited to, an order that the local agency line 9 take action on the housing de velopment project or emer gency line 10 shelter. The court may issue an order or judgment directing the line 11 local agenc y to appro ve the housing de velopment project or line 12 emergency shelter if the court finds that the local agency acted in line 13 bad f aith when it disappro ved or conditionally appro ved the line 14 housing de velopment or emer gency shelter in violation of this line 15 section. The court shall retain jurisdiction to ensure that its order line 16 or judgment is carried out and shall a ward reasonable attorney’s line 17 fees and costs of suit to the plaintif f or petitioner , pro vided, line 18 however, that the court shall not award attorney’s fees in either of line 19 the following instances:
line 20 (I)  The court finds, under e xtraordinary circumstances, that line 21 awarding fees would not further the purposes of this section. line 22 (II)  (ia)  In a case concerning a disapproval within the meaning line 23 of subparagraph (J) or (K) of paragraph (6) of subdivision (h), the line 24 court finds that the local agenc y acted in good f aith and had line 25 reasonable cause to disapprove the housing development project line 26 due to the e xistence of a controlling question of la w about the line 27 application of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division line 28 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources line 29 Code) or implementing guidelines as to which there w as a line 30 substantial ground for dif ference of opinion at the time of the line 31 disapproval.
line 32 (ib)  This subclause shall become inoperative on January 1, 2031. line 33 (B)  Upon a determination that the local agenc y has f ailed to line 34 comply with the order or judgment compelling compliance with line 35 this section within the time period prescribed by the court, the line 36 court shall impose fines on a local agenc y that has violated this line 37 section and require the local agenc y to deposit an y fine le vied line 38 pursuant to this subdi vision into a local housing trust fund. The line 39 local agency may elect to instead deposit the fine into the Building line 40 Homes and Jobs Trust Fund. The fine shall be in a minimum 98 — 26 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per housing unit in the line 2 housing de velopment project on the date the application w as line 3 deemed complete pursuant to Section 65943. In determining the line 4 amount of the fine to impose, the court shall consider the local line 5 agency’s progress in attaining its target allocation of the regional line 6 housing need pursuant to Section 65584 and an y prior violations line 7 of this section. Fines shall not be paid out of funds already line 8 dedicated to affordable housing, including, but not limited to, Low line 9 and Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds, funds dedicated to line 10 housing for very low, low-, and moderate-income households, and line 11 federal HOME Investment Partnerships Program and Community line 12 Development Block Grant Program funds. The local agency shall line 13 commit and e xpend the mone y in the local housing trust fund line 14 within fiv e years for the sole purpose of financing ne wly line 15 constructed housing units affordable to extremely low, very low, line 16 or low-income households. After five years, if the funds have not line 17 been expended, the money shall revert to the state and be deposited line 18 in the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund for the sole purpose line 19 of financing ne wly constructed housing units af fordable to line 20 extremely low, very low, or low-income households. line 21 (C) If the court determines that its order or judgment has not line 22 been carried out within 60 days, the court may issue further orders line 23 as provided by law to ensure that the purposes and policies of this line 24 section are fulfilled, including, but not limited to, an order to vacate line 25 the decision of the local agenc y and to appro ve the housing line 26 development project, in which case the application for the housing line 27 development project, as proposed by the applicant at the time the line 28 local agency took the initial action determined to be in violation line 29 of this section, along with any standard conditions determined by line 30 the court to be generally imposed by the local agenc y on similar line 31 projects, shall be deemed to be appro ved unless the applicant line 32 consents to a different decision or action by the local agency. line 33 (D) Nothing in this section shall limit the court’ s inherent line 34 authority to mak e an y other orders to compel the immediate line 35 enforcement of any writ brought under this section, including the line 36 imposition of fees and other sanctions set forth under Section 1097 line 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
line 38 (2) For purposes of this subdi vision, “housing or ganization” line 39 means a trade or industry group whose local members are primarily line 40 engaged in the construction or management of housing units or a 98 AB 1621 — 27 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 nonprofit or ganization whose mission includes pro viding or line 2 advocating for increased access to housing for lo w-income line 3 households and have filed written or oral comments with the local line 4 agency prior to action on the housing de velopment project. A line 5 housing or ganization may only file an action pursuant to this line 6 section to challenge the disapproval of a housing development by line 7 a local agenc y. A housing or ganization shall be entitled to line 8 reasonable attorney’s fees and costs if it is the prevailing party in line 9 an action to enforce this section.
line 10 (l) If the court finds that the local agency (1) acted in bad faith line 11 when it violated this section and (2) failed to carry out the court’s line 12 order or judgment within the time period prescribed by the court, line 13 the court, in addition to an y other remedies pro vided by this line 14 section, shall multiply the fine determined pursuant to subparagraph line 15 (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (k) by a factor of five. If a court line 16 has previously found that the local agenc y violated this section line 17 within the same planning period, the court shall multiply the fines line 18 by an additional factor for each previous violation. For purposes line 19 of this section, “bad faith” includes, but is not limited to, an action line 20 or inaction that is fri volous, prete xtual, intended to cause line 21 unnecessary delay, or entirely without merit.
line 22 (m) (1) Any action brought to enforce the pro visions of this line 23 section shall be brought pursuant to Section 1094.5 of the Code line 24 of Civil Procedure, and the local agency shall prepare and certify line 25 the record of proceedings in accordance with subdi vision (c) of line 26 Section 1094.6 of the Code of Ci vil Procedure no later than 30 line 27 days after the petition is serv ed, pro vided that the cost of line 28 preparation of the record shall be borne by the local agency, unless line 29 the petitioner elects to prepare the record as provided in subdivision line 30 (n) of this section. A petition to enforce the pro visions of this line 31 section shall be filed and serv ed no later than 90 days from the line 32 later of (1) the ef fective date of a decision of the local agenc y line 33 imposing conditions on, disapproving, or any other final action on line 34 a housing de velopment project or (2) the e xpiration of the time line 35 periods specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (6) of line 36 subdivision (h). Upon entry of the trial court’s order, a party may, line 37 in order to obtain appellate re view of the order , file a petition line 38 within 20 days after service upon it of a written notice of the entry line 39 of the order, or within such further time not exceeding an additional line 40 20 days as the trial court may for good cause allow, or may appeal 98 — 28 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 the judgment or order of the trial court under Section 904.1 of the line 2 Code of Civil Procedure. If the local agency appeals the judgment line 3 of the trial court, the local agency shall post a bond, in an amount line 4 to be determined by the court, to the benefit of the plaintiff if the line 5 plaintiff is the project applicant.
line 6 (2)  (A)  A disapproval within the meaning of subparagraph (J) line 7 of paragraph (6) of subdi vision (h) shall be final for purposes of line 8 this subdi vision, if the local agenc y did not mak e a la wful line 9 determination within the time period set forth in paragraph (5) of line 10 subdivision (a) of Section 65589.5.1 after the applicant’ s timely line 11 written notice.
line 12 (B)  This paragraph shall become inoperative on January 1, 2031. line 13 (3)  (A)  A disapproval within the meaning of subparagraph (K) line 14 of paragraph (6) of subdi vision (h) shall be final for purposes of line 15 this subdi vision, if the local agenc y did not mak e a la wful line 16 determination within 90 days of the applicant’ s timely written line 17 notice.
line 18 (B)  This paragraph shall become inoperative on January 1, 2031. line 19 (n)  In any action, the record of the proceedings before the local line 20 agency shall be filed as e xpeditiously as possible and, line 21 notwithstanding Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure or line 22 subdivision (m), all or part of the record may be prepared (1) by line 23 the petitioner with the petition or petitioner’s points and authorities, line 24 (2) by the respondent with respondent’s points and authorities, (3) line 25 after payment of costs by the petitioner, or (4) as otherwise directed line 26 by the court. If the expense of preparing the record has been borne line 27 by the petitioner and the petitioner is the pre vailing party, the line 28 expense shall be taxable as costs.
line 29 (o)  (1)  Subject to paragraphs (2), (6), and (7), and subdivision line 30 (d) of Section 65941.1, a housing de velopment project shall be line 31 subject only to the ordinances, policies, and standards adopted and line 32 in ef fect when a preliminary application including all of the line 33 information required by subdi vision (a) of Section 65941.1 w as line 34 submitted.
line 35 (2)  Paragraph (1) shall not prohibit a housing de velopment line 36 project from being subject to ordinances, policies, and standards line 37 adopted after the preliminary application was submitted pursuant line 38 to Section 65941.1 in the following circumstances:
line 39 (A)  In the case of a fee, charge, or other monetary exaction, to line 40 an increase resulting from an automatic annual adjustment based 98 AB 1621 — 29 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 on an independently published cost index that is referenced in the line 2 ordinance or resolution establishing the fee or other monetary line 3 exaction.
line 4 (B)  A preponderance of the evidence in the record establishes line 5 that subjecting the housing development project to an ordinance, line 6 policy, or standard be yond those in ef fect when a preliminary line 7 application w as submitted is necessary to mitig ate or a void a line 8 specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety, as defined line 9 in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (j), and there line 10 is no feasible alternative method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid line 11 the adverse impact.
line 12 (C)  Subjecting the housing development project to an ordinance, line 13 policy, standard, or any other measure, beyond those in effect when line 14 a preliminary application was submitted is necessary to a void or line 15 substantially lessen an impact of the project under the California line 16 Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section line 17 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
line 18 (D)  The housing de velopment project has not commenced line 19 construction within two and one-half years, or three and one-half line 20 years for an affordable housing project, following the date that the line 21 project received final approval. For purposes of this subparagraph:
line 22 (i)  “Affordable housing project” means a housing development line 23 that satisfies both of the following requirements:
line 24 (I)  Units within the de velopment are subject to a recorded line 25 affordability restriction for at least 55 years for rental housing and line 26 45 years for owner-occupied housing, or the first purchaser of each line 27 unit participates in an equity sharing agreement as described in line 28 subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdi vision (c) of Section line 29 65915.
line 30 (II)  All of the units within the development, excluding managers’ line 31 units, are dedicated to lo wer income households, as defined by line 32 Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
line 33 (ii)  “Final approval” means that the housing development project line 34 has received all necessary appro vals to be eligible to apply for , line 35 and obtain, a building permit or permits and either of the following line 36 is met:
line 37 (I)  The e xpiration of all applicable appeal periods, petition line 38 periods, reconsideration periods, or statute of limitations for line 39 challenging that final approval without an appeal, petition, request line 40 for reconsideration, or legal challenge having been filed. 98 — 30 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (II)  If a challenge is filed, that challenge is fully resolv ed or line 2 settled in favor of the housing development project. line 3 (E)  The housing de velopment project is re vised follo wing line 4 submittal of a preliminary application pursuant to Section 65941.1 line 5 such that the number of residential units or square footage of line 6 construction changes by 20 percent or more, e xclusive of an y line 7 increase resulting from the receipt of a density bonus, incenti ve, line 8 concession, waiver, or similar provision, including any other locally line 9 authorized program that of fers additional density or other line 10 development bonuses when af fordable housing is pro vided. For line 11 purposes of this subdi vision, “square footage of construction” line 12 means the b uilding area, as defined by the California Building line 13 Standards Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations). line 14 (3)  This subdi vision does not pre vent a local agenc y from line 15 subjecting the additional units or square footage of construction line 16 that result from project re visions occurring after a preliminary line 17 application is submitted pursuant to Section 65941.1 to the line 18 ordinances, policies, and standards adopted and in effect when the line 19 preliminary application was submitted.
line 20 (4)  For purposes of this subdivision, “ordinances, policies, and line 21 standards” includes general plan, community plan, specific plan, line 22 zoning, design review standards and criteria, subdivision standards line 23 and criteria, and an y other rules, re gulations, requirements, and line 24 policies of a local agency, as defined in Section 66000, including line 25 those relating to development impact fees, capacity or connection line 26 fees or charges, permit or processing fees, and other exactions. line 27 (5)  This subdivision shall not be construed in a manner that line 28 would lessen the restrictions imposed on a local agency, or lessen line 29 the protections afforded to a housing development project, that are line 30 established by an y other la w, including an y other part of this line 31 section.
line 32 (6)  This subdivision shall not restrict the authority of a public line 33 agency or local agenc y to require mitig ation measures to lessen line 34 the impacts of a housing development project under the California line 35 Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section line 36 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
line 37 (7)  With respect to completed residential units for which the line 38 project approval process is complete and a certificate of occupancy line 39 has been issued, nothing in this subdi vision shall limit the line 40 application of later enacted ordinances, policies, and standards 98 AB 1621 — 31 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 that regulate the use and occupancy of those residential units, such line 2 as ordinances relating to rental housing inspection, rent line 3 stabilization, restrictions on short-term renting, and b usiness line 4 licensing requirements for owners of rental housing. line 5 (p)  (1)  Upon an y motion for an a ward of attorne y’s fees line 6 pursuant to Section 1021.5 of the Code of Ci vil Procedure, in a line 7 case challenging a local agenc y’s appro val of a housing line 8 development project, a court, in weighing whether a significant line 9 benefit has been conferred on the general public or a lar ge class line 10 of persons and whether the necessity of private enforcement makes line 11 the award appropriate, shall give due weight to the degree to which line 12 the local agenc y’s appro val furthers policies of this section, line 13 including, but not limited to, subdi visions (a), (b), and (c), the line 14 suitability of the site for a housing de velopment, and the line 15 reasonableness of the decision of the local agency. It is the intent line 16 of the Legislature that attorney’s fees and costs shall rarely, if ever, line 17 be awarded if a local agenc y, acting in good f aith, approved a line 18 housing development project that satisfies conditions established line 19 in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 65589.5.1 line 20 or paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 65589.5.2. line 21 (2)  This subdi vision shall become inoperati ve on January 1, line 22 2031.
line 23 (q)  This section shall be kno wn, and may be cited, as the line 24 Housing Accountability Act.
line 25 (r)  The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision line 26 of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall line 27 not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect line 28 without the invalid provision or application.
line 29 SEC. 2. Section 65913.3 of the Government Code is amended line 30 to read:
line 31 65913.3. (a)  (1)  A local agency or state agency shall compile line 32 one or more lists that shall specify in detail the information that line 33 will be required from an y applicant for a postentitlement phase line 34 permit. The local agenc y or state agenc y may re vise the lists of line 35 information required from an applicant. Any revised list shall not line 36 apply to any permit pending review.
line 37 (2)  A local agency or state agenc y shall post an e xample of a line 38 complete, approved application and an example of a complete set line 39 of postentitlement phase permits. A local agenc y shall post line 40 examples for at least fiv e types of housing development projects 98 — 32 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 in the jurisdiction, including, but not limited to, accessory dwelling line 2 unit, duplex, multifamily, mixed use, and townhome. line 3 (3)  (A)  A local agenc y shall mak e the items required by line 4 paragraphs (1) and (2) available on the agency’s internet website line 5 no later than January 1, 2024.
line 6 (B)  A state agency shall make the items required by paragraphs line 7 (1) and (2) available on the agency’s internet website no later than line 8 January 1, 2026.
line 9 (b)  (1)  (A)  A local agenc y or state agenc y shall determine line 10 whether an application for a postentitlement phase permit is line 11 complete and provide written notice of this determination to the line 12 applicant not later than 15 business days after the local agency or line 13 state agency received the application.
line 14 (B)  If the local agency or state agency determines an application line 15 is incomplete, the local agenc y or state agenc y shall provide the line 16 applicant with a list of incomplete items and a description of how line 17 the application can be made complete. The list shall be limited to line 18 incomplete items that are included on the lists required by line 19 paragraph (1) of subdivision (a). The list and description shall be line 20 provided with the written notice required by subparagraph (A). line 21 (2)  (A)  After recei ving a notice that the application w as line 22 incomplete, an applicant may cure and address the items that are line 23 deemed to be incomplete by the local agency or state agency. line 24 (B)  In the re view of an application submitted pursuant to line 25 subparagraph (A), the local agency or state agency shall not require line 26 the application to include an item that was not included in the list line 27 required by subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1).
line 28 (C)  If an applicant submits an application pursuant to line 29 subparagraph (A), the local agency or state agency shall determine line 30 whether the additional application has remedied all incomplete line 31 items listed in the determination issued pursuant to subparagraph line 32 (B) of paragraph (1). This additional application is subject to the line 33 timelines and requirements specified in subparagraph (A) of line 34 paragraph (1).
line 35 (3)  If a local agenc y or state agenc y does not mak e a timely line 36 determination as required by paragraph (1) or (2) and the line 37 application or resubmitted application states that it is for a line 38 postentitlement phase permit, the application or resubmitted line 39 application shall be deemed to be complete for the purposes of line 40 this chapter.
98 AB 1621 — 33 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (c)  (1)  (A)  For housing development projects with 25 units or line 2 fewer, a local agenc y or state agenc y shall complete the re view line 3 and do either of the following:
line 4 (i)  If the local agenc y or state agenc y determines that the line 5 complete application is not compliant with the permit standards, line 6 return in writing a full set of comments to the applicant with a line 7 comprehensive request for revisions.
line 8 (ii)  If the local agenc y or state agenc y determines that the line 9 complete application is compliant with the permit standards, return line 10 the appro ved permit application on each postentitlement phase line 11 permit requested.
line 12 (B)  The local agency or state agency shall immediately transmit line 13 that determination to the applicant by electronic mail and, if line 14 applicable, by posting the response on its internet website in the line 15 manner prescribed in subdivision (b) of Section 65913.3.5 not later line 16 than 30 b usiness days after the local agenc y or state agenc y line 17 determines that an application for a postentitlement phase permit line 18 is complete pursuant to subdivision (b).
line 19 (C)  (i)  As part of its re view, the local agenc y or state agenc y line 20 shall not require or request more than tw o plan check and line 21 specification re views in connection with an application for a line 22 building permit, unless the local agenc y’s or state agenc y’s line 23 requirement or request for additional re view is accompanied by line 24 written findings based on substantial e vidence in the record that line 25 the additional re view is necessary to address a specific, adv erse line 26 impact on public health or safety.
line 27 (ii)  Notwithstanding clause (i), a local agenc y or state agenc y line 28 may den y an application that is not compliant with the permit line 29 standards following two plan check and specification reviews. line 30 (iii)  An applicant may request additional submittals of line 31 applications that are not compliant with the permit standards. line 32 (iv)  This subparagraph shall not be construed to af fect the line 33 number of submittals that a local agenc y or state agenc y may line 34 require or request for any postentitlement phase permit other than line 35 a building permit.
line 36 (2)  (A)  For housing development projects with 26 units or more, line 37 a local agency or state agenc y shall complete the re view and do line 38 either of the following:
line 39 (i)  If the local agenc y or state agenc y determines that the line 40 complete application is not compliant with the permit standards, 98 — 34 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 return in writing a full set of comments to the applicant with a line 2 comprehensive request for revisions.
line 3 (ii)  If the local agenc y or state agenc y determines that the line 4 complete application is compliant with the permit standards, return line 5 the appro ved permit application on each postentitlement phase line 6 permit requested.
line 7 (B)  The local agency or state agency shall immediately transmit line 8 that determination to the applicant by electronic mail and, if line 9 applicable, by posting the response on its internet website in the line 10 manner prescribed in subdivision (b) of Section 65913.3.5 not later line 11 than 60 b usiness days after the local agenc y or state agenc y line 12 determines that an application for a postentitlement phase permit line 13 is complete pursuant to subdivision (b).
line 14 (C)  (i)  As part of its re view, the local agenc y or state agenc y line 15 shall not require or request more than tw o plan check and line 16 specification re views in connection with an application for a line 17 building permit, unless the local agenc y’s or state agenc y’s line 18 requirement or request for additional re view is accompanied by line 19 written findings based on substantial e vidence in the record that line 20 the additional re view is necessary to address a specific, adv erse line 21 impact on public health or safety.
line 22 (ii)  Notwithstanding clause (i), a local agenc y or state agenc y line 23 may den y an application that is not compliant with the permit line 24 standards following two plan check and specification reviews. line 25 (iii)  An applicant may request additional submittals of line 26 applications that are not compliant with the permit standards. line 27 (iv)  This subparagraph shall not be construed to af fect the line 28 number of submittals that a local agenc y or state agenc y may line 29 require or request for any postentitlement phase permit other than line 30 a building permit.
line 31 (3)  Once a local agenc y or state agenc y determines that a line 32 postentitlement phase permit is compliant with applicable permit line 33 standards pursuant to paragraph (1) or (2), the local agency or state line 34 agency shall not subject the postentitlement phase permit to an y line 35 appeals or additional hearing requirements.
line 36 (4)  The time limits in this subdivision shall not apply if the local line 37 agency or state agenc y mak es written findings within the time line 38 limits specified in paragraph (1) or (2) based on substantial line 39 evidence in the record that the proposed postentitlement phase line 40 permit might have a specific, adverse impact on public health or 98 AB 1621 — 35 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 safety and that additional time is necessary to process the line 2 application.
line 3 (5)  (A)  If federal or state law requires review of the application line 4 by another public agency that is independent of the local agenc y line 5 or state agency before the local agency or state agency is authorized line 6 to act on the application, the time limits in this subdi vision shall line 7 be tolled for the application until the public agency completes the line 8 review and returns the application to the local agenc y or state line 9 agency.
line 10 (B)  After the public agency returns the application to the local line 11 agency or state agenc y, the local agenc y or state agenc y shall line 12 complete the re view within the time remaining under the time line 13 limit, subject to subparagraph (C).
line 14 (C)  Within three b usiness days of the start of the tolling and line 15 within three business days of the resumption of the time limit, the line 16 local agency or state agency shall notify the applicant of the tolling line 17 and the resumption of the time limit, respecti vely, by electronic line 18 mail and, if applicable, by posting the notification on its internet line 19 website in the manner prescribed in subdi vision (b) of Section line 20 65913.3.5.
line 21 (d)  (1)  If a local agency or state agency finds that a complete line 22 application is noncompliant, the local agency or state agency shall line 23 provide the applicant with a list of items that are noncompliant line 24 and a description of ho w the application can be remedied by the line 25 applicant within the time limits specified in subdivision (c). line 26 (2)  The local agency or state agency shall provide the list and line 27 description authorized by paragraph (1) when it transmits its line 28 determination to the applicant as required by subdivision (c). line 29 (3)  If a local agenc y or state agenc y denies a postentitlement line 30 phase permit application based on a determination that the line 31 application is noncompliant, the applicant may attempt to remedy line 32 the application.
line 33 (4)  If an applicant submits an application pursuant to paragraph line 34 (3), the additional application is subject to the timelines of a new line 35 application as specified in subdivision (c).
line 36 (5)  The local agency or state agency shall not request or require line 37 any action or inaction as a result of a b uilding inspection line 38 undertaken to assess compliance with the applicable b uilding line 39 permit standards that would represent a deviation from a previously line 40 approved building plan or similar approval for the building permit, 98 — 36 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 unless the local agency’s or state agency’s requirement or request line 2 is accompanied by written findings based on substantial evidence line 3 in the record that both of the following apply:
line 4 (A)  A reasonable person could not interpret the b uilding plan line 5 or similar approval that was approved by the local agency or state line 6 agency as being compliant with the applicable standards for the line 7 building permit.
line 8 (B)  The deviation is necessary to address a specific, adv erse line 9 impact on public health or safety.
line 10 (e)  (1)  If a postentitlement phase permit is determined to be line 11 incomplete under subdi vision (b) or denied or determined to be line 12 noncompliant under subdivision (c) or (d), the local agency or state line 13 agency shall pro vide a process for the applicant to appeal that line 14 decision in writing to the governing body of the agency. line 15 (2)  (A)  With respect to a postentitlement phase permit line 16 concerning housing development projects with 25 units or fewer, line 17 a local agency or state agency on the appeal shall provide a final line 18 written determination by not later than 30 b usiness days after line 19 receipt of the applicant’s written appeal.
line 20 (B)  With respect to a postentitlement phase permit concerning line 21 housing development projects with 26 units or more, a local agency line 22 or state agenc y on the appeal shall pro vide a final written line 23 determination by not later than 45 b usiness days after receipt of line 24 the applicant’s written appeal.
line 25 (3)  If the applicant’ s appeal pursuant to this subdi vision is line 26 denied, or a decision on the appeal is not made within the timelines line 27 provided, or an appeals process is not pro vided as required, the line 28 applicant may seek a writ of mandate to compel appro val of the line 29 application.
line 30 (f)  If a local agency violates subdivisions (b) to (e), inclusive, line 31 it shall be in violation of Section 65589.5.
line 32 (g)  If a state agency violates subdivisions (b) to (e), inclusive, line 33 the permit shall be deemed approved and any related reviews shall line 34 be deemed complete.
line 35 (h)  Except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of, line 36 and subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of, subdi vision (c), this line 37 section does not place limitations on the amount of feedback that line 38 a local agency or state agency may provide or revisions that a local line 39 agency or state agency may request of an applicant. 98 AB 1621 — 37 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (i)  For residential or residential mix ed-use developments that line 2 are subject to the requirements set forth in Section 65913.4, the line 3 provisions of paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 65913.4 line 4 shall apply. Permits for these de velopments that are subject to line 5 paragraph (2) of subdi vision (h) of Section 65913.4 shall not be line 6 in conflict with the requirements of this section. The local agency line 7 or state agency shall comply with both sets of standards. line 8 (j)  This section does not preclude an applicant and a local agency line 9 or state agency from mutually agreeing to an extension of any time line 10 limit provided by this section. Ho wever, a local agenc y or state line 11 agency shall not require an agreement as a condition of accepting line 12 the application for, or processing of, a postentitlement phase permit, line 13 unless the agreement is obtained for the purpose of permitting line 14 concurrent processing of related appro vals or an en vironmental line 15 review on the same housing development project. line 16 (k)  For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
line 17 (1)  “Housing development project” has the same meaning as in line 18 paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 65905.5. line 19 (2)  “Local agency” means any county, city, or city and county. line 20 (3)  (A)  “Postentitlement phase permit” includes all of the line 21 following:
line 22 (i)  All nondiscretionary permits and re views that are required line 23 or issued by the local agency after the entitlement process has been line 24 completed to begin construction of a development that is intended line 25 to be at least tw o-thirds residential, e xcluding discretionary and line 26 ministerial planning permits, entitlements, and other permits and line 27 reviews that are co vered under Chapter 4.5 (commencing with line 28 Section 65920). A postentitlement phase permit includes, b ut is line 29 not limited to, all of the following:
line 30 (I)  Building permits, and all interdepartmental reviews required line 31 for the issuance of a building permit, including plan checking and line 32 building inspection.
line 33 (II)  Permits for minor or standard offsite improvements. line 34 (III)  Permits for demolition.
line 35 (IV)  Permits for minor or standard excavation and grading. line 36 (ii)  All b uilding permits and other permits issued under the line 37 California Building Standards Code (T itle 24 of the California line 38 Code of Regulations) or any applicable local building code for the line 39 construction, demolition, or alteration of b uildings, whether line 40 discretionary or nondiscretionary.
98 — 38 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 (iii)  (I)  Except as provided in subclause (II), any postentitlement line 2 review by a state agency that is necessary to begin construction of line 3 a development that is intended to be at least two-thirds residential, line 4 excluding discretionary and ministerial planning permits, line 5 entitlements, and other permits and reviews that are covered under line 6 Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 65920).
line 7 (II)  Notwithstanding subclause (I), a postentitlement phase line 8 permit does not include either of the following:
line 9 (ia)  A permit issued by a state agenc y acting pursuant to line 10 delegated federal permitting or enforcement authority under the line 11 federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.) or the federal line 12 Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 300f et seq.). line 13 (ib)  A permit authorizing discharges of waste to waters of the line 14 state.
line 15 (B)  A local agency or state agency may identify a threshold for line 16 determining whether a permit constitutes a “minor” or “standard” line 17 permit for the purposes of this paragraph, which shall be supported line 18 by written findings. A local agenc y that identifies a threshold line 19 pursuant to this subparagraph shall adopt the threshold by line 20 ordinance.
line 21 (C)  A postentitlement phase permit does not include a permit line 22 required and issued by the California Coastal Commission, a line 23 special district, or a utility that is not o wned and operated by a line 24 local agency.
line 25 (4)  “Specific, adverse impact” means a significant, quantifiable, line 26 direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified, and line 27 written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions line 28 as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete. line 29 (5)  “State agency” has the same meaning as that term is defined line 30 in Section 11000.
line 31 SEC. 3. The amendments of subclause (I) of clause (i) of line 32 subparagraph (A) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (j) (k) of Section line 33 65913.3 of the Government Code made by this act do not constitute line 34 a change in, but are declaratory of, existing law. line 35 SEC. 4. The Legislature finds and declares that Section 2 of line 36 this act amending Section 65913.3 of the Go vernment Code line 37 addresses a matter of state wide concern rather than a municipal line 38 affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the line 39 California Constitution. Therefore, Section 2 of this act applies to line 40 all cities, including charter cities.
98 AB 1621 — 39 —

7.b
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621) line 1 SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to line 2 Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because line 3 a local agency or school district has the authority to le vy service line 4 charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or line 5 level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section line 6 17556 of the Government Code.

O
98 — 40 — AB 1621

7.b
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Assembly Bill 1621 - Bill Text (State Legislation: AB 748 and AB 1621)

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 8

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE LOS

ANGELES COUNTY AFFORDABLE HOUSING SOLUTIONS

AGENCY FOR SUPPORT OF SECTOR REPRESENTATIVE
DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office
PRESENTER: Masis Hagobian

RECOMMENDED ACTION

City Council:

BACKGROUND

The Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency (LACAHSA) was established through Senate Bill (SB) 679 (Chapter 557, Statutes of 2024) as a regional entity responsible for administering voter-approved funding to support affordable housing solutions throughout Los Angeles County (County).

Funding for LACAHSA is provided through Measure A, a permanent one-half cent countywide sales tax approved by County voters in November 2024. Measure A revenues are intended to support the production and preservation of affordable housing, renter protections, and homelessness prevention efforts across the County.

Of the 21 members serving on the LACAHSA Board of Directors, four are sector 8 Packet Pg. 95

Page 2 ends

representatives, each representing a subregion of Los Angeles County. As a member of the LACAHSA Board of Directors, Councilmember Gibbs serves as the North Sector representative.

In an effort to establish administrative support and intergovernmental coordination for the sector representatives, the LACAHSA Board of Directors approved grant funding of $75,000 for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2025-26, $155,000 for Fiscal Year 2026-27, and $160,000 for Fiscal Year 2027-28 to each sector.

Prior to receiving any funding, the City of Santa Clarita (City) is required to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with LACAHSA. The MOU is a binding commitment of the City to comply with all requirements of SB 679 and Measure A in the use of the funding and to comply with all policies and guidelines of LACAHSA. If approved, the MOU will remain in effect until June 30, 2026, unless earlier terminated or extended by written mutual agreement between the City and LACAHSA. Subsequent renewal terms will be on the same terms and conditions provided in the attached MOU, except that payment provided under this MOU shall be automatically updated to reflect the allocations set forth in the Annual Expenditure and Strategy Plan adopted by the LACAHSA Board of Directors.

After the MOU is fully executed, the City will use the funding towards administrative support and sector coordination conducted by City staff.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION

Other action, as directed by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT

Upon approval of the recommended actions, revenue account Measure A LACAHSA Miscellaneous Revenue (277-462101) and expenditure account LACAHSA Contractual Services (2773209-516101) will be increased by $75,000 each starting in Fiscal Year 2025-26, $155,000 in Fiscal Year 2026-27, and $160,000 in Fiscal Year 2027-28.

ATTACHMENTS
LACAHSA Sector Support Grant Funding MOU (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) 8 Packet Pg. 96

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 9

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - NOVEMBER 3, 2026
DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services
PRESENTER: Melody Bartlette

RECOMMENDED ACTION

City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution calling and giving notice of the General Municipal Election to be held November 3, 2026, and requesting consolidation with Los Angeles County’s General Election.

2. Adopt a resolution for candidate statement regulations.

3. Authorize the City Manager to reimburse Los Angeles County for costs of services performed.

BACKGROUND

The procedures for conducting a General Municipal Election are established by state law.

Pursuant to these requirements, the attached resolution calls and gives notice of a General Municipal Election to be held on November 3, 2026, for the purpose of electing three City of Santa Clarita (City) Councilmembers for a term of four years each.

As the result of a settlement agreement, on April 22, 2014, the City Council adopted Ordinance 14-03 moving the date of the City's General Municipal Election from April of even-numbered years to November of even-numbered years and requesting that the County of Los Angeles (County) approve consolidation with the Statewide General Election conducted by the County in November of even-numbered years. On March 24, 2015, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (BOS) approved the City’s request. Therefore, whenever an election is called by the City, Section 10403 of the Elections Code requires that the City Council adopt and file a resolution requesting consolidation with the Statewide General Election, and file a copy of the resolution with the BOS and the County Elections Official (Los Angeles County Registrar- 9 Packet Pg. 97

Page 2 ends

Recorder/County Clerk).

Pursuant to a second settlement agreement, the City Council adopted Ordinance 23-4 on June 13, 2023, creating a by-district election system and dividing the City of Santa Clarita into five districts. The City continues to operate staggered elections, and regular elections continue to be consolidated with Statewide General Elections in November of even-numbered years to fill expired City Council terms. The City’s first districted election was held on November 5, 2024, when Districts 1 and 3 seats were elected; therefore, three seats will be up for election on November 3, 2026: District 2, District 4, and District 5. In the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election, registered voters within District 2, District 4, and District 5 may cast one vote for an eligible candidate residing within their same district. Following the County’s certification and the City Council's ratification of election results, expected in December 2026, the City will be fully districted.

Candidates in the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election will file nomination papers with the Local Elections Official (City Clerk). The Candidate Filing Period will open on Monday, July 13, and close on Thursday, August 7. If an eligible incumbent whose term expires in 2026 does not file by this deadline, the filing period is extended until Thursday, August 12, when candidates, other than incumbents, may file within that district. The extension does not apply where there is no incumbent eligible to be elected.

Section 13307 et seq. of the Elections Code sets out regulations for the preparation and form of candidate statements. As such, each candidate may prepare an optional candidate statement. This optional statement may be printed in the Official Sample Ballot Booklet for a fee as set by the County. This section of the Elections Code also authorizes the City Clerk to estimate the cost of candidate statements and require each candidate filing a statement to pay a deposit in advance for his or her pro-rata share as a condition of having the statement included in the Official Sample Ballot Booklet. Any overpayment shall be refunded within 30 days following the election. In the event of underpayment, the candidate will be billed for his or her pro-rata share of actual costs.

The County-set fees were not available at the time of the posting of this agenda, but will be made available to candidates when pulling nomination papers.

Based on the Election Cost Estimate Calculator provided by the Los Angeles County Registrar- Recorder/County Clerk, the estimated cost of services to be provided by the County for the consolidated election is $392,253.99 (as of April 20, 2026). The estimated cost is based on certain factors, including, but not limited to, the number of seats being voted upon, the number of measures, and the number of registered voters at the time of the election. This cost estimate includes three seats and no measures.

Section 10262 requires that the County Elections Official conducting the election shall also conduct the canvass, and Section 15372 requires the Elections Official to prepare a certified statement of the results of the election and submit it to each jurisdiction within 30 days of the election. The Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk is tentatively scheduled to certify the election results on December 3, 2026. The City Clerk shall certify the results to the City Council no later than the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting, or at a special meeting called for this purpose, to declare the results and to install the newly elected councilmembers.

9 Packet Pg. 98

Page 3 ends

ALTERNATIVE ACTION

No alternative actions have been identified by staff.

FISCAL IMPACT

Upon adoption of the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget, adequate funds will be appropriated to conduct the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election.

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution Calling the Election and Requesting Consolidation Resolution Adopting Regulations for Candidates Pertaining to Statements 9 Packet Pg. 99

Page 1 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 26-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,

CALIFORNIA, CALLING FOR AND REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF

THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO ORDER THE CONSOLIDATION OF A GENERAL

MUNICIPAL ELECTION FOR THE ELECTION OF THREE BY-DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL SEATS TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2026, WITH THE STATEWIDE

GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES THE SAME DAY; TO AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO CANVASS THE RETURNS OF SAID GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION;

AND TO REQUEST THAT THE REGISTRAR-RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK OF SAID

COUNTY BE PERMITTED TO RENDER ELECTION SERVICES TO THE CITY OF

SANTA CLARITA RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF SAID GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 10403

WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to general law cities in the State of California, a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 3, 2026, for the election of Municipal Officers in the City of Santa Clarita (City); and

WHEREAS, a Statewide General Election to be held in the County of Los Angeles has been or will be called to be held on November 3, 2026; and

WHEREAS, it is desired, pursuant to the authority found in California Elections Code section 10403, to consolidate said General Municipal Election with said Statewide General Election to be held in the County of Los Angeles (County).

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Santa Clarita, California, on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing one member of the City Council to District 2 for the full term of four years, one member of the City Council to District 4 for the full term of four years, and one member of the City Council to District 5 for the full term of four years.

SECTION 2. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles is hereby respectfully requested to order the consolidation of said General Municipal Election to be held on November 3, 2026, with the Statewide General Election to be held in the County of Los Angeles on November 3, 2026.

SECTION 3. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles is hereby further respectfully requested to place upon the same ballot as that provided for said Statewide General Election to be held in the County of Los Angeles on November 3, 2026, the names of

9.a
Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: Resolution Calling the Election and Requesting Consolidation (GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - NOVEMBER 3, 2026)

Page 2 of 3 ends

the candidates for three districted offices of Councilmember for full terms to be submitted to the electors of the City of Santa Clarita at said General Municipal Election.

SECTION 4. The City of Santa Clarita acknowledges that the consolidated election will be held and conducted in the manner prescribed in Section 10418 of the California Elections Code.

SECTION 5. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles is hereby authorized and respectfully requested to issue instructions to the County Election Department to take any and all steps necessary, with the exception of candidate filing services, for the holding of the consolidated election.

SECTION 6. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles is hereby authorized and respectfully requested to authorize and permit the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk of the County of Los Angeles to:

a) Print and supply ballots for said City of Santa Clarita General Municipal Election;

b) Mail the City’s sample ballots and candidate statements of qualifications to the electors of the City of Santa Clarita as part of the same material that will be mailed to the voters of the Statewide General Election to be held in the County of Los Angeles;

c) Perform such other services as may be required for the consolidation and conduct of said City of Santa Clarita General Municipal Election with said Statewide General Election to be held in the County of Los Angeles.

SECTION 7. The Vote Centers for the election shall be open as required during the identified voting period pursuant to California Elections Code sections 4005 and 14401.

SECTION 8. The City shall reimburse the County of Los Angeles in full for the services performed on behalf of the City upon the presentation of a bill by the County.

SECTION 9. The City Clerk is hereby directed to deliver a certified copy of this resolution to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles and to transmit an electronic copy to the Board of Supervisors and the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk of the County of Los Angeles.

SECTION 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 12th day of May 2026.

9.a
Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: Resolution Calling the Election and Requesting Consolidation (GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - NOVEMBER 3, 2026)

Page 3 of 3 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )

______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

_______________________________

CITY CLERK

DATE:__________________________

I, Melody Bartlette, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 26- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 12th day of May 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________

CITY CLERK

9.a
Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: Resolution Calling the Election and Requesting Consolidation (GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - NOVEMBER 3, 2026)

Page 1 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 26-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE

PERTAINING TO CANDIDATE STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2026

WHEREAS, Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any local agency shall adopt regulations pertaining to material prepared by any candidate for a municipal election, including costs of the optional candidate statement.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. That pursuant to Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at an election to be held in the City of Santa Clarita (City) on November 3, 2026, may prepare a candidate’s statement in the form and format designated by the Local Elections Official/City Clerk. For candidates submitting the optional candidate statement, the following applies:

A. The statement may include the name, age, occupation of the candidate, and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate’s education and qualifications, expressed by the candidate themselves.

B. The statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations.

C. The statement shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk/Local Elections Official at the time the candidate nomination papers are filed.

D. Except as provided for in Section 13309, the candidate statement cannot be changed or revised once filed; a candidate statement may be withdrawn by 5 p.m. of the next business day after the last day to file the statement.

SECTION 2. LANGUAGE POLICY. Pursuant to Elections Code sections 13307 and 14201 and Federal Voting Rights Act provisions, the County of Los Angeles (County) will translate and make available candidate statements in all languages as required.

A. The County will print English or English and Spanish language candidate statements in the English language version of the Official Sample Ballot Booklet at a candidate’s request and the candidate’s own expense.

B. The County will mail separate voter information guides and candidates’ statements to only those voters who are on the County voter file as having requested a voter information guide in a particular language.

9.b
Packet Pg. 103
Attachment: Resolution Adopting Regulations for Candidates Pertaining to Statements (GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - NOVEMBER 3,

Page 2 of 3 ends

SECTION 3. CANDIDATE FEES AND PAYMENT. The City Clerk shall estimate the total cost of the candidates’ statements filed pursuant to Section 13307 of the Elections Code, including costs incurred as a result of complying with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (as amended), and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance to the City his or her estimated pro rata share as a condition of having his or her statement included in the Official Sample Ballot. The estimated fee is an approximation of the actual cost that varies from one election to another and may be significantly more or less than the estimate, depending on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the actual number of candidates filing statements, registered voters, language choices, and formatting. Accordingly, the City Clerk is not bound by the estimate and may, on a pro rata basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expense or refund any excess paid, depending on the final actual cost. In the event of underpayment, the City Clerk shall invoice the candidate for the balance of the cost incurred. In the event of overpayment, the City Clerk shall process a refund of the excess amount paid upon receipt of the County of Los Angeles invoice.

A. Translations:

1. The candidate shall not be required to pay for the cost of translating the candidate’s statement into any required language as specified in Section 2 above pursuant to federal and/or state law.

2. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of translating the candidate’s statement into any language that is not required as specified in Section 2 above, pursuant to federal and/or state law, but is requested as an option by the candidate.

B. Printing:

1. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate’s statement in English in the Official Sample Ballot Booklet.

2. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate’s statement in Spanish in the Official Sample Ballot Booklet.

C. Publishing:

1. Candidates who choose to print a statement in the Official Sample Ballot will have their statements published on the Los Angeles County lavote.net website.

2. Candidates may elect online publishing exclusively, at a fee set by the Los Angeles County Registrar/Recorder County Clerk.

SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS. The City Clerk shall comply with all recommendations and standards set forth by the California Secretary of State regarding ballot designations and other matters relating to elections.

9.b
Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: Resolution Adopting Regulations for Candidates Pertaining to Statements (GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - NOVEMBER 3,

Page 3 of 3 ends

SECTION 5. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS. No candidate will be permitted to include additional material in the Official Sample Ballot Booklet.

SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate’s representative a copy of this resolution at the time nominating petitions are issued.

SECTION 7. That this resolution shall apply only to the election to be held on November 3, 2026, and then shall be of no further force and effect.

SECTION 8. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 12th day of May 2026.

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

_______________________________

CITY CLERK

DATE:__________________________

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )

I, Melody Bartlette, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 26-___ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 12th day of May 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________

CITY CLERK

9.b
Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: Resolution Adopting Regulations for Candidates Pertaining to Statements (GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - NOVEMBER 3,

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 10

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: RECREATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACT
DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services
PRESENTER: Ryan Drake

RECOMMENDED ACTION

City Council:

1. Approve the use of a cooperative agreement through The Interlocal Purchasing System (TIPS) Contract #220105.

4. Authorize a net decrease in appropriations within the General Fund (Fund 100), consisting of a decrease of $155,151 from Expenditure Account 1002200-516101 in Fiscal Year 2026-27 and a corresponding increase of $7,753 to Expenditure Account 1002102-516132; beginning in Fiscal Year 2027-28, increase the ongoing base budget in Expenditure Account 1002200- 516101 by five percent annually for the Recreation Management System and increase the ongoing base budget in Expenditure Account 1002102-516132 by ten percent annually for credit card processing fees, contingent upon the appropriation of funds in the annual budget for such fiscal years, as detailed in Exhibit A.

5. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney review.
10 Packet Pg. 106

Page 2 ends

BACKGROUND

The City of Santa Clarita (City) is recognized for delivering high-quality recreation programs that are very popular and sought after by residents of all ages. The CivicRec Recreation Management System (RMS) is the operational platform that supports these services, processing more than 90,000 annual transactions over the last three years, while generating significant revenue. Residents depend on the RMS to register for classes, sports leagues, and other programs, making it a mission-critical system for both public access and internal operations.

The CivicRec RMS provides several established capabilities that are essential to the City’s operations, including proven financial system and general ledger integration to support accurate revenue tracking and reconciliation, advanced facility reservation functionality with multi-day booking capabilities, and a demonstrated track record of stability and long-term use within the municipal market. These features directly align with the City’s operational requirements and reduce the risk of service disruption.

Additionally, CivicRec RMS offers a modern, mobile-friendly interface and enhanced functionality that support both staff efficiency and improved customer experience. Continued use of this platform ensures operational continuity and service reliability for Santa Clarita residents.

Based on research and cost analysis, staff recommends using the City’s cooperative purchasing option for this procurement. The use of cooperative purchasing allows the City to place orders against a competitively awarded public agency contract. The City is using the cooperative purchasing contract with The Interlocal Purchasing System (TIPS) Contract #220105, which allows the City to take advantage of an existing competitive process. This contract, which was awarded on February 14, 2022, was solicited through a competitive bid process and is valid through February 28, 2027.

CivicRec will collect a fixed rate of $0.30 per transaction, plus a processing fee of 3 percent for standard credit card transactions and 3.5 percent for American Express transactions. The total amount collected will fluctuate depending on the number of transactions processed, as reflected in Recommended Action No. 2.

Given the critical nature of recreation services, approaching program cycles, and the need for uninterrupted service delivery, City staff recommend awarding a new contract for continued use of the CivicRec RMS. The platform represents the most practical, cost-competitive, and time- sensitive solution to meet the City’s current needs.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION

Other action as determined by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT

Authorize a net decrease in appropriations within the General Fund (Fund 100), consisting of a decrease of $155,151 from Expenditure Account 1002200-516101 in Fiscal Year 2026-27 and a 10 Packet Pg. 107

Page 3 ends

corresponding increase of $7,753 to Expenditure Account 1002102-516132; beginning in Fiscal Year 2027-28, increase the ongoing base budget in Expenditure Account 1002200-516101 by five percent annually for the Recreation Management System and increase the ongoing base budget in Expenditure Account 1002102-516132 by ten percent annually for credit card processing fees, contingent upon the appropriation of funds in the annual budget for such fiscal years, as detailed in Exhibit A

ATTACHMENTS
Civic Plus Exhibit-A
TIPS Contract 220105 (available in the City Clerk's File) 10 Packet Pg. 108
Fund Name General Fund
KeyOrg / Object Code Technology / Contractual Services
Account 1002200-516101
Optional Year 2
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Year 4 Year 5
Current Budget 210,000$ 210,000$ 210,000$ 630,000$ 210,000$ 210,000$ Budget Adjustment (155,151)$ (152,408)$ (149,529)$ (457,088)$ (146,505)$ (143,330)$ CivicPlus Cost 49,863$ 52,356$ 54,974$ 157,193$ 57,723$ 60,609$ 10% Contingency 4,986$ 5,236$ 5,497$ 15,719$ 5,772$ 6,061$ Final Budget - CivicPlus Cost 54,849$ 57,592$ 60,471$ 172,912$ 63,495$ 66,670$ Fund Name General Fund
KeyOrg / Object Code Treasury / Card Processing Fee
Account 1002102-516132
Optional Year 2
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Year 4 Year 5
Current Budget 185,900$ 185,900$ 185,900$ 557,700$ 185,900$ 185,900$ Budget Adjustment 7,753$ 27,118$ 48,420$ 83,291$ 71,852$ 97,627$ Final Budget - CivicPlus Cost 193,653$ 213,018$ 234,320$ 640,991$ 257,752$ 283,527$ Net Budget Impact (147,398)$ (125,290)$ (101,109)$ (373,796)$ (74,653)$ (45,703)$ Exhibit A
Fiscal Impact - Budget Adjustments
Technology
Finance
Optional Year 1
Optional Year 1

10.a
Packet Pg. 109
Attachment: Civic Plus Exhibit-A (RECREATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACT AWARD)

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 11

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: VALENCIA HERITAGE PARK TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT P1021-PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
DEPARTMENT: Neighborhood Services
PRESENTER: Susan Nelson

RECOMMENDED ACTION

City Council:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Valencia Heritage Park Tennis/Pickleball Court Improvement Project P1021.

5. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney review.

11 Packet Pg. 110

Page 2 ends

BACKGROUND

Valencia Heritage Park was constructed in 2004 and consists of three tennis courts, two multi- use sports fields, a playground, a restroom building, and a picnic gazebo.

The tennis court facility hosts various programming activities for the City of Santa Clarita’s (City) Recreation Division and is heavily used by the tennis community. Over the years, the demand for tennis use at this site has increased significantly. By constructing an additional tennis court, the City will expand its programming capability, meet the growing demand for additional tennis play, and provide the capacity to host sanctioned tennis tournaments, as most tournaments require four tennis courts. In addition, refurbishment of the existing courts is necessary to ensure quality and consistency between all courts.

The new tennis court will be constructed adjacent to the existing tennis courts, on the northeast side, and is designed to flow seamlessly with the existing park landscape. The new tennis court amenities include lighting, fencing, windscreen, and seating areas. Additionally, the new tennis court will also include pickleball striping, maximizing the use of space. Four pickleball overlays will be added to the court, using a contrasting color for ease of play. This project will also include improvements to the existing three tennis courts, including resurfacing, striping, new netting, and replacement of the existing windscreen. Construction is anticipated to have a duration of approximately 20 weeks.

Supporting the theme of Sustainable Public Infrastructure in Santa Clarita Pathway Forward, the City’s five-year strategic plan, the proposed contract will provide vital repairs to the existing tennis courts at Valencia Heritage Park and will provide an additional amenity for community enjoyment.

Solicitation Process - Construction Contract
An invitation to bid was published and circulated on the City’s e-procurement system, Bid Net, on February 24, 2026. The City transmitted the solicitation to 2,821 vendors on BidNet, of which 107 vendors downloaded the materials. A total of six bids were submitted and opened on March 24, 2026. The results are shown below.

Company Location Bid Amount
Estate Design and Construction Los Angeles, CA $573,240 R.C. Becker, Inc. Santa Clarita, CA $637,853
All-American Construction Solutions Chino, CA $655,379
Western States Builders Escondido, CA $724,250
E&M Constructors Inc. San Fernando, CA $800,038
Angeles Contractor, Inc. City of Industry, CA $1,239,000

Upon reviewing the bids, staff determined the response from the apparent low bidder, Estate Design and Construction, to be non-responsive for failure to provide required documentation at the time of bid submission, as specified in the solicitation. Therefore, staff recommends awarding the project to R.C. Becker, Inc., the second lowest bidder. This contractor possesses a valid contractor’s license and is in good standing with the Contractor’s State License Board. The 11 Packet Pg. 111

Page 3 ends

contractor’s bid was reviewed for accuracy and conformance to the contract documents and was found to be complete. The bid proposal adheres to the project’s plans and specifications and is available in the City Clerk’s reading file.

The requested contingency will cover the cost of unforeseen site conditions, field adjustments, additional work requested by the City or other permitting agencies, and field investigations.

Solicitation Process - Design Services & Construction Support Contract The City conducted a Request for Proposal (RFP) to solicit proposals from qualified consulting firms to provide design services for the Valencia Heritage Park Tennis/Pickleball Court Improvement Project. The RFP was published and circulated via the City’s e-procurement system, BidNet, on August 15, 2024. The City transmitted the solicitation to 1,733 vendors on BidNet, of which 55 vendors downloaded the RFP; however, no proposals were received.

Pursuant to City of Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) Section 3.12.215, when no formal solicitation responses are received, the Purchasing Officer or designee is authorized to proceed with direct negotiations. Accordingly, staff contacted qualified consultants and solicited informal proposals for the project's design. Hirsch & Associates, Inc., (Hirsch & Associates) submitted a proposal that met the City’s needs and was determined to be fair and reasonable in cost and consistent with the project budget. On November 11, 2024, the City Council awarded a design contract for the Valencia Heritage Park Tennis/Pickleball Court Improvement Project to Hirsch & Associates based on their technical expertise and design experience with similar projects.

As the original design consultant, Hirsch & Associates possesses in-depth knowledge of the project and its technical requirements. Accordingly, staff determined that Hirsch & Associates represents the most efficient and cost-effective option to provide construction support services.

As the project advances into the construction phase, City staff recommends awarding a professional services contract to Hirsch & Associates in the amount of $17,060, inclusive of contingency, to provide construction support, necessary design modifications, and related services during the project construction phase. Pricing for these services was requested as part of the original RFP process, and Hirsch & Associates will maintain the same pricing as originally proposed.

Utilizing the original design consultant for construction support maintains continuity, promotes efficiency, and ensures appropriate technical oversight throughout project delivery. The proposal is available in the City Clerk’s reading file.

The City Council appropriated $695,076 for this project upon adoption of the Fiscal Year 2025- 26 budget. The requested transfer of savings in the amount of $134,865 brings the total project budget to $829,941, representing $701,639 in construction costs and $128,302 in project administrative costs. Project administrative costs include project management, materials testing, and construction support.

The Valencia Heritage Park Tennis/Pickleball Court Improvements Project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Article 19, Sections 15301 and 15303. These sections exempt 11 Packet Pg. 112

Page 4 ends

projects involving repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use, as well as the construction of limited small facilities not using significant amounts of hazardous substances and having all necessary public services available. This project meets the criteria for these exemptions because the Valencia Heritage Park Tennis/Pickleball Court Improvement Project will be performing repairs and maintenance to existing tennis court facilities, as well as constructing one new tennis court facility which will not be using significant amounts of hazardous substances and will have necessary public services available.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT

Upon approval of the recommended actions, $134,865 project savings from the North Oaks Sewer Replacement Project (P3038601-516101), will be transferred to the Valencia Heritage Tennis/Pickleball Court Improvements Project (P1021601-516101). The total project budget in the amount of $826,941 will adequately fund the construction and project administration.

ATTACHMENTS
P1021 Location Map
IFB PPOS-25-26-P1021 (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) RC Becker (available in the City Clerk's Reading File)
11 Packet Pg. 113

11.a
Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: P1021 Location Map (VALENCIA HERITAGE PARK TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURT

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 12

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: LEASE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT WITH SANTA CLARITA

STUDIOS CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT: Neighborhood Services
PRESENTER: Mariela Delgado

RECOMMENDED ACTION

City Council:

1. Authorize an amendment to the existing lease agreement with Santa Clarita Studios Corporation to provide a three-month rent deduction during the first year of the five-year renewal term.

2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney review.

BACKGROUND

In 2016, the City of Santa Clarita (City) entered into a public-private partnership with Santa Clarita Studios Corporation (Tenant) for the use of approximately 3.5 acres located in the Round Mountain Property for parking purposes. This arrangement was established to meet the parking needs of the film studio at the time. The original lease term commenced on July 1, 2016, for a period of ten years, with provisions allowing for two additional five-year extensions at the City’s sole discretion.

The Tenant has requested to exercise its first five-year extension option, subject to an annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustment, in accordance with the lease terms. Additionally, the Tenant shared how changes in the film industry have impacted the company. The City is aware of these industry trends and their local impact. Since 2022, film permits issued in the City have decreased by more than 34 percent. For these reasons, staff finds it fair and prudent to amend the agreement to provide a temporary rent waiver in the form of a three-month deduction during the first year of the renewal term. This approach allows for flexibility at the outset of the extension period while maintaining the City’s commitment to supporting the partnership and a local 12 Packet Pg. 115

Page 2 ends

business that has remained committed to boosting the Santa Clarita economy.

Staff recommends this temporary rent waiver as it supports tenant retention and promotes continuity of operations at the site.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION

Other actions as recommended by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT

An estimated amount of $66,810 will be received in Fiscal Year 2026-27, reflecting the first year of the renewal and accounting for the three-month deduction to the General Fund (100-431107).

Revenue in subsequent years will be adjusted annually in accordance with the Consumer Price Index (CPI), as specified in the lease agreement.
12 Packet Pg. 116

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 13

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH DRILTEK, INC.

DEPARTMENT: Neighborhood Services
PRESENTER: Susan Nelson

RECOMMENDED ACTION

City Council:

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all contracts and associated documents, subject to City Attorney review.

BACKGROUND

On October 28, 2025, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Driltek, Inc., for the plugging and abandonment of six idle oil wells located within the Needham Ranch Open Space.

The project was initiated to bring the wells into compliance with regulations overseen by the California Department of Conservation Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) and to eliminate future idle well fees associated with inactive wells on property owned by the City of Santa Clarita (City).

The work involves specialized plugging and abandonment procedures designed to permanently seal the wells and restore the site in accordance with CalGEM standards. Due to the wells having been drilled decades ago and left idle for an extended period, certain subsurface conditions could not be fully verified prior to commencing field operations. 13 Packet Pg. 117

Page 2 ends

During abandonment activities at one of the wells, the contractor encountered site conditions that differed from the permitting records on file with CalGEM. Specifically, subsurface conditions within the wellbore required additional remedial work to properly seal the well and ensure compliance with CalGEM requirements. These conditions were not observable through standard pre-construction investigation methods and could only be identified upon physical access to the wellbore, as a result of inaccuracies in the well’s historical data.

As part of the procurement process, the City negotiated an all-inclusive contract price intended to encompass the work necessary to complete the well abandonment activities and obtain final approval from CalGEM. However, the conditions encountered at the well represent a significant change from those reasonably anticipated at the time the contract was executed.

To address these unforeseen conditions and complete the plugging process in accordance with regulatory requirements, additional work is necessary. The contractor submitted a change order request outlining the required modifications to the abandonment procedure and associated costs.

City staff reviewed the request, evaluated the justification for the additional work, and determined that the change in conditions was legitimate and the proposed costs are consistent with industry standards for similar specialized well abandonment work.

Approval of the proposed contract amendment will allow the contractor to complete the additional work necessary to properly plug the affected well and obtain final regulatory clearance from CalGEM. Completion of this work is essential to ensure the wells are permanently abandoned in accordance with state regulations and to protect the City from future environmental liability and regulatory penalties.

Staff recommends amending the existing construction contract with Driltek, Inc., to incorporate the additional costs associated with the unforeseen site conditions encountered during the well abandonment process.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT

Upon approval of the recommended actions, project savings from the North Oaks Park Sewer Project account P3038601-516101 in the amount of $98,000 will be transferred to the Needham Ranch Oil Wells Project account P2025601-516101 to support the amended contract. 13 Packet Pg. 118

Santa Clarita City CouncilMay 12, 2026

Santa Clarita City Council
May 12, 2026