CITY OF SANTA CRUZ
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, California 95060
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Regular Meeting – April 12, 2022
Updated April 8, 2022 – see item 27.
10:30 A.M. CLOSED SESSION, ZOOM
1:00 P.M. CONSENT, CONSENT PUBLIC HEARINGS, PUBLIC HEARINGS, AND
GENERAL BUSINESS, ZOOM
6:00 P.M. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PUBLIC HEARING, ZOOM
COVID-19 ANNOUNCEMENT: Due to the Omicron variant, this meeting will be held via teleconference ONLY.
In order to minimize exposure to COVID-19 and to comply with the social distancing suggestion, the meeting may be viewed remotely, using any of the following sources:
Click on Zoom link (no time delay): https://zoom.us/j/94684401344 Online at http://www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-council/council-meetings Online at Watch – Community Television of Santa Cruz County Comcast Channel 25
Or: Call any of the numbers below. If one is busy, try the next one. 1-833-548-0276 (Toll Free)
1-833-548-0282 (Toll Free)
1-877-853-5247 (Toll Free)
1-669-900-9128
Enter the meeting ID number: 946 8440 1344
When prompted for a Participant ID, press #.
Press *9 on your phone to “raise your hand” when the Mayor calls for public comment. It will be your turn to speak when the Mayor calls on you. Press *6 to unmute yourself.
The timer will then be set to 2 minutes.
Correspondence to be included in the agenda packet must be received by 5:00 pm on Monday, April 11th.
April 12, 2022 City Council 2
PLEASE NOTE:
Requests for extra speaking time on items other than Oral Communications must be made by 5:00 p.m. on Sunday, April 10th by emailing the Mayor and the City Clerk.
Approval will be confirmed via email.
[email protected] [email protected]
The City of Santa Cruz does not discriminate against persons with disabilities. Out of consideration for people with chemical sensitivities we ask that you attend fragrance free. Upon request, the agenda can be provided in a format to accommodate special needs. Additionally, if you wish to attend this public meeting and will require assistance such as an interpreter for American Sign Language, Spanish, or other special equipment, please call the City Clerk’s Department at 420-5030 at least five days in advance so that we can arrange for such special assistance, or email [email protected]. The CalRelay system number: 1-800-735-2922.
Si desea asistir a esta reunión pública y necesita ayuda - como un intérprete de lenguaje de señas americano, español u otro equipo especial - favor de llamar al Departamento de la Secretaría de la Ciudad al 420-5030 al menos cinco días antes para que podamos coordinar dicha asistencia especial o envié un correo electrónico a [email protected]. El número del sistema Cal-Relay es: 1-800-735-2922.
Closed Session
10:30 AM
Closed Session
1. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code §54957.6) SEIU Temporary Employees
SEIU Service Employees
Mid Managers, OE3
Supervisors, OE3
Fire Management
Fire, IAFF
Police Management
Police Officers Association
Executives
City Negotiator - Lisa Murphy
2. Conference With Legal Counsel – Liability Claims (Government Code §54956.95)
Claimant: Chris and Scott Pinheiro
Claim against the City of Santa Cruz
April 12, 2022 City Council 3
Closed Session (continued)
3. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Government Code §54956.9(d)(1))
1) Dervishian v. Mott, Konzen, Gieringer, City of Santa Cruz, et al. (Santa Cruz Superior Court, Case No. 18CV01510)
2) Regents of the University of California, et al. v. City of Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz County Superior Court Case No. 20CV02152)
3) City of Santa Cruz v. Regents of the University of California, et al. (Santa Cruz County Superior Court Case No. 22CV00373)
April 12, 2022 City Council 4
City Council
1:00 PM
Call to Order
Roll Call
Presentations
4. Small Business Development Center Presentation
5. Jane Mio - Service Award of Excellence Awardee
6. Mayoral Proclamation Declaring March 15, 2022 as Equal Pay Day for Women
Presiding Officer's Announcements
Statements of Disqualification
Additions and Deletions
City Attorney Report on Closed Session
City Manager Report
7. The City Manager will report and provide updates on the City's business, COVID-19 response, and events.
April 12, 2022 City Council 5
Council Meeting Calendar
8. The City Council will review the meeting calendar attached to the agenda and revise it as necessary.
Consent Agenda
9. Resolution Authorizing the City to Continue Teleconferenced Public Meetings Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361 (CA)
Resolution authorizing legislative bodies of the City of Santa Cruz to continue the use of teleconferenced meetings pursuant to Assembly Bill 361.
10. Minutes of the March 22, 2022 City Council Meeting (CC) Motion to accept as submitted.
11. Minutes of the March 29, 2022 City Council Study Session (CC) Motion to accept as submitted.
12. Minutes of the March 29, 2022 City Council Special Meeting (CC) Motion to accept as submitted.
13. Resolution Declaring the City Council’s Intent Regarding Possible Proceeds from Measure F, a Sales and Use Tax Ballot Item on the June 2022 California Statewide Primary Election (CN)
Resolution declaring the City Council’s intent regarding the use of potential revenues generated by Measure F, a sales and use tax ballot item on the June 2022 California Statewide Primary Election.
14. Resolution Condemning Antisemitism (CN)
Resolution condemning antisemitism and expressing solidarity with the Jewish people in the community, in the United States, and around the globe.
April 12, 2022 City Council 6
Consent Agenda (continued)
15. Council Support of the Establishment of a New CalVet Veterans Home in Monterey County in Order to Provide Skilled Nursing and Memory Care Services for Aging, Disabled, and Homeless Veterans Living in the Central Coast Region of California (CN)
Motion to direct the Mayor to write a letter to the Monterey County Board of Supervisors and to California State Legislators in support of the establishment of a new CalVet Veterans Home in Monterey County.
16. Loan Consolidation and Affordability Term Extension for Sycamore Street Commons and La Playa Residential – Affordable Housing (ED) Motion to approve loan terms for the consolidation and extension of City of Santa Cruz loans for Sycamore Street Commons and La Playa Residential and authorize the City Manager to execute the loan documents in a form to be approved by the City Attorney for the purpose of rehabbing this affordable housing and extending the affordability period.
17. Expiration of Statewide Evictions Moratorium – Authorization to Enter into an Agreement with the Community Action Board for $150,000 for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance through December 31, 2022 (ED) Resolution appropriating $150,000 from the CA state funding for homelessness response and authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Community Action Board, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to provide tenant-based rental assistance through December 31, 2022.
April 12, 2022 City Council 7
Consent Agenda (continued)
18. Amend Lease with 1200 Pacific, LLC. to Include Conference Space at 1200 Pacific Avenue for use by the City’s Finance Department and Appropriate $442,827 for Conference Space, Space Improvements and Infrastructure, Lease Deposit, Office Furniture Move, Rental, and Purchase (FN)
Motion to:
1) Adopt a resolution amending the FY 2022 budget to increase appropriation in the amount of $442,827 for conference space, space improvements and infrastructure, deposit rental, office furniture move, rental, and purchase.
2) Authorize and direct the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Lease Agreement with 1200 Pacific, LLC., and any amendments thereto, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for premises located at 1200 Pacific Avenue to serve as office space for the Finance Department.
19. UV Bypass Valve Repair (m409659) – Notice of Completion (PW) Motion to accept the work of Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction Inc., (Santa Clara, CA) and to authorize the filing of the Notice of Completion for the UV Bypass Valve Repair Project (m409659).
April 12, 2022 City Council 8
Consent Agenda (continued)
20. High Voltage Portable Battery Charger for First All Electric Refuse Truck (g402205) – Budget Adjustment (PW)
Motion to:
1) Adopt a resolution amending the FY 2022 budget and appropriate funds in the amount of $179,552.38 to fully fund the high voltage portable battery; and
2) Adopt a resolution to authorize the City Manager to apply, accept, and appropriate funding from California Energy Commission’s grant programs that the City is eligible for a five-year term; and 3) Authorize the City Manager to apply, accept, and appropriate grant funds from California Energy Commission (CEC) Energy Infrastructure Incentives for Zero-Emission Commercial Vehicles (EnergIIZE Commercial Vehicles) and authorize FreeWire Technologies to apply for funds on the behalf of the City for the Ultrafast EV Charger with Integrated Storage (g402205).
21. 3 Water Cogeneration Cooling Line Replacement (c401407) – Authorization to Advertise and Award (PW)
Motion to approve the plans and specifications for 3 Water Cogeneration Cooling Line Replacement (c401407), authorize staff to advertise for bids, and award the contract. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Director of Public Works is authorized to execute changes orders within the approved project budget.
22. T2 Systems Parking Pay Stations - Award Contract (PW) Motion to award a contract for the purchase of 10 Luke II Parking Pay Stations from T2 Systems (Burnaby, BC) in the amount not to exceed $148,009.04.
End Consent Agenda
April 12, 2022 City Council 9
Consent Public Hearings
23. Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act Hearing for Approval of the California Municipal Finance Authority for Issuance of Tax-Exempt Bonds for the Benefit of the Sycamore Street Commons and La Playa Residential Affordable Housing Projects (ED)
1) Conduct the public hearing under the requirements of Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
2) Resolution approving the issuance of Tax-Exempt Revenue Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority (“CMFA”) for the benefit of Mercy Housing California 72, L.P., a California limited partnership, or another entity to be established by Mercy Housing California or an affiliate thereof (collectively, the “Borrower”), in an amount not to exceed $28 million dollars to provide financing for Sycamore Street Commons and La Playa Residential (the “Project”), such adoption is solely for the purposes of satisfying the requirements of TEFRA, the Code and the California Government Code Section 6500.
24. 2nd Reading and Final Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-03 Repealing Santa Cruz Municipal Code ("SCMC") Chapter 5.81 ("Vending and Display Devices on City Property") and Adding SCMC Chapter 5.82 (CM) Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-03 repealing Santa Cruz Municipal Code (“SCMC”) Chapter 5.81 (“Vending and Display Devices on City Property”) and adding SCMC Chapter 5.82 (“Sidewalk Vending”).
Public Hearings
25. Municipal Code Amendments Relating to Small Cell Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Responding to Modifications Requested by the California Coastal Commission (PL)
This item is continued to the April 26, 2022 Council meeting.
26. Slope Regulation Ordinance Amendments to Chapters 18.45, 24.04,
24.08, 24.14, and 24.22 of the Santa Cruz Municipal Code (PL) This item is continued to the April 26, 2022 Council meeting.
April 12, 2022 City Council 10
Public Hearings (continued)
The below item was updated to amend the recommendation and the resolution attachment.
27. Green Building Program Proposed Fee Increase (PL)
Motion to:
1) Introduce for publication an amendment to Chapter 24.15, (Green Building Regulations), to specify that the fee associated with the Green Building Educational Resource Fund will be established by resolution of the City Council; and
2) Adopt a resolution to increase the Green Building Fee from 0.0025 to
0.0100 times the overall valuation of a project to retain the $50,000 fee cap, and to incorporate said fee increase into the City Unified Master Fee Schedule with a footnote that annual Consumer Price Index increases do not apply to the fee; and
3) Direct staff to update all associated fee schedules, such as userfriendly fee schedules developed by staff and post them online, where applicable, for the public.
General Business
28. Transportation and Public Works Commission (TPWC) Appointment (CC) This item is continued to the May 10, 2022 Council meeting.
29. Parks and Recreation Annual Report (PR)
This item is continued to the April 26, 2022 Council meeting.
30. Public Gathering and Expression Events Ordinance Amendment (CA) Introduce for publication an ordinance amending City of Santa Cruz Municipal Code (“SCMC”) Chapter 10.65 – Public Gathering and Expression Events.
Recess - The City Council will recess to the 6:00 p.m. session.
April 12, 2022 City Council 11
City Council
6:00 PM
Call to Order
Roll Call
Oral Communications Announcement – Community members may address the Council for three minutes or less about any matter not on the agenda. 30 minutes is allocated for Oral Communications. No extra time for groups will be granted.
Oral Communications
Public Hearing
31. City Council Review of the Planning Commission’s Approval of the Coastal and Design Permits to Authorize the Development Associated with the Amended Municipal Code Pertaining to the Parking of Oversized Vehicles and to Implement City-wide Safe Parking Programs for Unhoused City Residents Living in Oversized Vehicles in the City of Santa Cruz (PL)
Resolution acknowledging the environmental determination and approving the Coastal Permit and Design Permit based on the findings listed in the draft resolution and the Conditions of Approval attached as Exhibit “A”.
Adjournment
April 12, 2022 City Council 12
INFORMATION ITEMS PREVIOUSLY DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCILMEMBERS ADDENDUM TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – APRIL 12, 2022
32. City Manager: Quarterly Grant Report – Fiscal Year 2022 as of December 31, 2021 - 3/17/22 (CMFYI 260)
33. Finance Department: Portfolio Management Report – Pooled Cash and Investments as of February 28, 2022 - 3/21/22 (FNFYI 352)
MAYOR'S PROCLAMATIONS
ADDENDUM TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – APRIL 12, 2022
34. Proclaiming the month of March 2022 as “Red Cross Month” and encouraging all citizens to reach out and support its humanitarian mission.
35. Proclaiming March 22, 2022 as “Jane Mio Day” in recognition of the past five years and countless hours that she has volunteered her time, while also engaging with numerous organizations and volunteers, to improve the community and habitat along the San Lorenzo River; for her ongoing dedication to the environment, parks, and people of Santa Cruz; for her work as a Parks and Recreation Commissioner and Chair; and for her special service creating the Benchlands Environmental Stewardship Team—she is truly a champion of the community.
36. Proclaiming March 23, 2022 as “Madelyn McCaul Day” and encouraging all local residents to join in recognizing this extraordinary resident of our local community.
April 12, 2022 City Council 13
Advisory Body Appointments
The following positions are vacant. Council will make the appointments at a future meeting.
Historic Preservation Commission One opening
Sister Cities Committee Two openings
Transportation and Public Works Commission One opening
County Latino Affairs Commission One opening
Public Hearing
If, in the future, you wish to challenge in court any of the matters on this agenda for which a public hearing is to be conducted, you may be limited to raising only those issues which you (or someone else) raised orally at the public hearing or in written correspondence received by the City at or before the hearing.
Any person seeking to challenge a City Council decision made as a result of a proceeding in which, by law, a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action either 60 days or 90 days following the date on which the decision becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 Please refer to code of Civil Procedure 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes “final.” The 60-day rule applies to all public hearings conducted pursuant to the City’s Zoning Ordinance, Title 24, Santa Cruz Municipal Code. The 90-day rule applies to all other public hearings.
April 12, 2022 City Council 14
City Council Agenda Legislative History Addendum
No information was submitted.
City staff is responsible for providing the City Clerk with such documentation and information for the Legislative History Addendum. The information will be on file in the City Clerk’s Department.
The Addendum is a listing of information specific to City Council business, but which does not appear on a Council meeting agenda. Such entities would include, but not be limited to: Court decisions, Coastal Commission Appeals of City Council actions, Closed Session Agreements/Settlements, which are public record, Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments, Local Agency Formation Commission.
Santacruzsbdc.org 831-479-6136 [email protected]
Where Businesses Start, Grow and Prosper! 4.1
What is the SBDC?
Santa Cruz County Small Business Development Center is a premier hub of experts experienced in mainstreet, techstreet, and agriculture business.
Business owners and aspiring entrepreneurs receive in-depth advising and training to obtain capital, launch businesses, grow sales, and create jobs. 4.2 Small Business Ecosystem
4.3 Services Offered: Trainings
4.4 Services Offered: Advising
4.5 Services Offered: Relationships
4.6 Economic Impact in the City of Santa Cruz 2021
4.7 4.8
4.9 4.10
1 City Manager’s Report
April 12, 2022
7.1 2
Homelessness Response
● Citywide Action Plan
implementation under way
● Contract with Salvation
Army for the Armory in
place
● Benchlands closure slated
for July
7.2 3
Upcoming Community Meetings
Open House for Downtown
Expansion South of Laurel
Wednesday, April 20, 5-8 p.m.
Kaiser Permanente Arena
at 140 Front Street
cityofsantacruz.com/downtown
Library Mixed Use Project
Community Workshop
Thursday, April 21, 6 p.m.
cityofsantacruz.com/mixeduselibrary
7.3 4
Hybrid Meetings Begin April 26
● In-person: 809 Center St.
● Online: cityofsantacruz.com/councilmeetings
7.4 5 7.5
2022 Final Water Supply Outlook
Santa Cruz City Council
April 12, 2022
7.6 Monthly Rainfall 1.43 3.79 5.716.29 6.50 4.56 1.99
0.91 0.24
0.02 0.04
0.24 0.46
3.80 2.63
1.75 1.55
2.24 0.21
0.74 0.07
0.01 0.00
1.35 5.6
2.21 9.81
0.73 0.01
1.19 0
2 4
6 8
10 12
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Inches
Monthly Rainfall, City of Santa Cruz 3/31/22
Long-Term Average (1981-2010) Water Year 1977 Water Year 2022 Season to date: 19.52 in
Normal season to date: 27.70 in
Percent of average: 70.3%
7.7 Reservoir Draw Down Chart
7.8 Annual GPCD
7.9 Questions
7.10 Meeting Type
Holiday
Jewish Holiday
Regular Meeting
Special Meeting
Study Session (will be added as scheduled)
Budget Hearing
DATE Location Meeting Type
April 15/16
April 19 Zoom 3:30 p.m. Special Meeting ‐ Open to the Public TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
May 24 and 25 TBD Budget Hearings
May 30
June 7 TBD 4:30 p.m. Council Special Meeting ‐ Open to the Public TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
July 4
TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
September 5
TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
September 25/26
TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
October 4/5
TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
November 11
TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
November 24
November 25
December 18/19
TBD Closed Session ‐ Closed to the Public
TBD Council Regular Meeting ‐ Open to the Public
December 25
December 27 Meeting Cancelled ‐ CITY COUNCIL DARK
City Hall Closure ‐ Christmas Day
Hanukkah (City observed ‐ sundown to sundown)
Yom Kippur (City observed ‐ sundown to sundown)
Rosh Hashanah (City observed ‐ sundown to sundown)
November 8
October 11
October 25
City Hall Closure ‐ Veteran's Day (observed)
May 24
City Hall Closure ‐ Memorial Day
City Hall Closure ‐ Labor Day
August 23
July 12 and 26 Meetings Cancelled ‐ CITY COUNCIL DARK
August 9
City Hall Closure ‐ Independence Day
June 14
May 10
Passover (City observed ‐ sundown to sundown)
April 26
City Council Meeting Calendar for 2022
November 22
December 13
City Hall Closure ‐ Thanksgiving Day
City Hall Closure ‐ Day After Thanksgiving Day
June 28
September 13
September 27
Please note: Meeting times are not final and are likely to change
8.1 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 03/31/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: City Attorney
SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing the City to Continue Teleconferenced Public Meetings Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361 (CA)
RECOMMENDATION: Resolution authorizing legislative bodies of the City of Santa Cruz to continue the use of teleconferenced meetings pursuant to Assembly Bill 361.
BACKGROUND: On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom issued a proclamation of State of Emergency in response to the developing COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the continued spread of the virus, the Governor issued Executive Order N-29-20 on March 17, 2020, which included a provision authorizing suspensions to the Ralph M. Brown Act’s (“Brown Act”) teleconferencing rules in order to facilitate virtual meetings while public health orders were in place.
On June 11, 2021, the Governor issued Executive Order N-08-21, which provided that the Brown Act teleconferencing suspensions would expire after September 30, 2021. On September 16, 2021, the Governor signed Assembly Bill 361 (“AB 361”), an urgency measure taking effect immediately, which amended the Brown Act to allow local legislative bodies to continue using teleconferencing and virtual meeting technology provided certain conditions are met.
DISCUSSION: AB 361 allows for teleconferenced meetings during a declared State of Emergency, as defined under the California Emergency Services Act, if one of the following circumstances apply: (1) State or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; (2) The legislative body is meeting to determine whether, as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; or (3) The legislative body has determined that, as a result of the emergency, meeting in person presents imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.1 The Governor’s March 4, 2020 proclamation of State of Emergency is still in effect. Measures continue to exist that impose and recommend measures to promote social distancing. The California Department of Public Health (“CDPH”) requires that all individuals wear masks indoors in specific, high-risk settings.2 Further, the CDPH and the Santa Cruz County Health 1 Cal. Gov’t Code § 54953(e)(1)(A)-(C)
2 See CDPH, Guidance for the Use of Face Coverings (Updated February 28, 2022), https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/COVID-19/guidance-for-face-coverings.aspx.
9.1 Officer strongly recommend that all individuals continue to wear masks in indoor public settings.3
Moreover, in recent months, the highly transmissible omicron variant has caused increases in positive cases and hospitalizations locally and throughout the State. Although positive case rates have recently decreased, the nature of the pandemic is unpredictable and transmission rates have the potential to rise quickly. As such, holding meetings in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees due to the continued spread of COVID-19.
To continue teleconferenced meetings under AB 361, the City Council will need to declare every thirty (30) days that it has reconsidered the circumstances of the State of Emergency and either (1) the State of Emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person; or (2) State or local health officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing.4
This declaration is needed for any use of teleconferenced meetings pursuant to AB 361, including for two City meeting models: (1) A City Council hybrid model that uses the City Council Chambers as an in person venue along with teleconference attendance; and (2) Continued use of teleconferencing for City Council and Brown Act City boards, commissions and committees.
At its regular meeting of October 12, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. NS-29,877, authorizing legislative bodies of the City of Santa Cruz to continue using teleconferenced meetings pursuant to AB 361. At its regular meetings of November 9, 2021, November 23, December 14, 2021, January 11, 2022, February 8, 2022, March 8, 2022, and March 22, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. NS-29,886, NS-29,894, NS-29,900, NS-29,915, NS29,923, NS-29,933, and NS-29,942, further authorizing legislative bodies of the City of Santa Cruz to continue using teleconferenced meetings pursuant to AB 361.
This Resolution would re-authorize the legislative bodies of the City of Santa Cruz to continue to use teleconferenced meetings for an additional thirty (30) days from the date of its adoption.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
Prepared By:
Mary-Haley Ousley
Deputy City Attorney
Submitted By:
Tony Condotti
City Attorney
Approved By:
Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. RESOLUTION.DOCX
3 See Press Release, Twelve Bay Area Health Officers to Life Most Indoor Mask Mandates on February 16 (Feb. 9, 2022), https://www.santacruzhealth.org/Portals/7/pdfs/Coronavirus/02.09.22%20ABAHO%20Masking_FINAL.pdf. 4 Cal. Gov’t Code § 54953(e)(3).
9.2 RESOLUTION NO. NS-XX,XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA AUTHORIZING THE
CONTINUED USE OF TELECONFERENCED MEETINGS PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency, as defined under the California Emergency Services Act, due to the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, due to the threat of COVID-19, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20, which suspended certain requirements of Government Code section 54950 et seq., the Ralph M. Brown Act (“Brown Act”), in order to allow local legislative bodies to conduct meetings telephonically or electronically without a physical meeting place; and
WHEREAS, on June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21, which stated that the provision suspending requirements of the Brown Act in Executive Order N-29-20 would remain in effect through September 30, 2021, at which point the suspensions would expire; and
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 361 into law, an urgency measure effective upon adoption, amending the Brown Act to allow legislative bodies to continue to meet remotely during a proclaimed State of Emergency, and either state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, or the legislative body determines that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees;
WHEREAS, on October 12, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. NS-29, 877, making its initial finding that the requisite conditions exist for the legislative bodies of the City of Santa Cruz to conduct remote teleconference meetings; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2021, November 23, 2021, December 14, 2021, January 11, 2022, February 8, 2022, March 8, 2022, and March 22, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. NS-29,886, NS-29,894, NS-29,900, NS-29,915, NS-29,923, NS-29,933, and NS-29,942, each making a subsequent finding that the requisite conditions exist for the legislative bodies of the City of Santa Cruz to conduct remote teleconference meetings; and WHEREAS, as a condition of authorizing the continued use of teleconferenced meetings, the City Council must, every 30 days, reconsider the circumstances of the State of Emergency that exists in the City and the City Council has done so; and WHEREAS, the State of Emergency proclaimed by the Governor on March 4, 2020, remains in effect; and
9.3 2
WHEREAS, the California Department of Public Health and the Santa Cruz County Health Officer require that all individuals wear face coverings indoors in specified high-risk settings, and continue to strongly recommend that all individuals wear face coverings in indoor public settings; and
WHEREAS, in recent months, the highly contagious omicron variant has caused an increase in positive cases and hospitalizations locally and throughout the State of California, and although positive case rates have recently decreased, the nature of the pandemic is unpredictable, and transmission rates have the potential to rise quickly; and WHEREAS, due to the continued impact of COVID-19, the City continues to be concerned about the health and safety of attendees at public meetings should they be held in person and in a shared indoor public meeting space, as such, the City Council desires to take the actions necessary to comply with AB 361 and to continue to hold its meetings remotely.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz (City Council) as follows:
A. The City Council hereby acknowledges that the Governor’s State of Emergency proclamation issued on March 4, 2020 remains in effect; and B. The City Council finds that due to the emergence of the omicron variant and the continued threat of COVID-19, holding in person meetings for the City Council, City Commissions, and City Committees continues to present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.
C. The legislative bodies of the City of Santa Cruz are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution, including continuing to conduct open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act.
D. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective until the earlier of (i) thirty days from the adoption of this Resolution, or (ii) such time the City Council adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which the legislative bodies of the City of Santa Cruz may continue teleconferencing without compliance with the Brown Act’s prior rules regarding teleconferencing.
9.4 3
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
APPROVED: ______________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
9.5 MINUTES ARE UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED BY COUNCIL
City of Santa Cruz
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, California 95060
MINUTES OF A CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 22, 2022
10:30 AM
Mayor Brunner opened the City Council Closed Session at 10:32 a.m. in a public meeting via Zoom, for the purpose of announcing the agenda, and receiving public testimony.
Roll Call
Present: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson (via Zoom), Cummings (via Zoom), Brown (arrived at 10:38 a.m. via Zoom), Meyers (via Zoom); Vice Mayor Watkins (via Zoom); Mayor Brunner (via Zoom).
Absent: Councilmember Golder.
Staff: City Manager M. Huffaker (via Zoom), Assistant City Manager L. Schmidt (via Zoom), City Attorney T. Condotti (via Zoom), Human Resources Director L. Murphy (via Zoom), Interim Finance Director B. Magee (via Zoom), Deputy City Clerk Administrator J. Wood, City Clerk Administrator B. Bush (via Zoom).
Public Comment
Mayor Brunner opened the public comment period at 10:34 a.m. There were no speakers. Mayor Brunner closed the public comment period at 10:35 a.m.
Closed Session
1. Conference With Legal Counsel – Liability Claims (Government Code §54956.95) 1) Claimant: Neil Bernardi-Wright
2) Claimant: Armand Joseph Tiano
Claims against the City of Santa Cruz
10.1 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6000
Closed Session (continued)
2. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code §54957.6) SEIU Temporary Employees
SEIU Service Employees
Mid Managers, OE3
Supervisors, OE3
Fire Management
Fire, IAFF
Police Management
Police Officers Association
Executives
City Negotiator - Lisa Murphy
At this time, the meeting was closed to the public. (See page 6002 for a report on Closed Session.)
10.2 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6001
City of Santa Cruz
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, California 95060
MINUTES OF A CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 22, 2022
12:00 PM
Call to Order – Mayor Brunner called the meeting to order at 12:02 p.m. via Zoom.
Roll Call
Present: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson (via Zoom), Golder (arrived at 4:17 p.m. via Zoom), Cummings (via Zoom), Brown (via Zoom), Meyers (via Zoom); Vice Mayor Watkins (via Zoom); Mayor Brunner (via Zoom).
Absent: None.
Staff: City Manager M. Huffaker (via Zoom), Assistant City Manager L. Schmidt (via Zoom), City Attorney T. Condotti (via Zoom), Director of Public Works M. Dettle (via Zoom), Interim Chief of Police B. Escalante (via Zoom), Director of Planning and Community Development L. Butler (via Zoom), Interim Director of Finance B. Magee (via Zoom), Director of Economic Development B. Lipscomb (via Zoom), Director of Information Technology K. Morgan (via Zoom), Human Resources Director L. Murphy (via Zoom), Interim Fire Chief R. Oatey (via Zoom), Director of Parks and Recreation T. Elliot (via Zoom), Principal Management Analyst T. Lake (via Zoom), Senior Planner S. Neuse (via Zoom), Principal Planner M.
VanHua (via Zoom), Housing and Community Development Manager J. de Wit (via Zoom), Deputy City Clerk Administrator J. Wood, City Clerk Administrator B. Bush (via Zoom).
Presentations
3. Mayoral Proclamation Declaring March 2022 as Red Cross Month Mayor Brunner read a proclamation declaring March, 2022 as Red Cross Month.
American Red Cross Board members Anita Clerisse and Dan Ripke spoke.
4. Library Mixed-Use Project Update
Director of Economic Development B. Lipscomb provided an update on the Library Mixed-Use Project.
10.3 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6002
Presentations (continued)
5. Mayoral Proclamation Declaring March 22, 2022 as Jane Mio Day Mayor Brunner read from a proclamation declaring March 22, 2022 as Jane Mio Day. Jane Mio spoke.
Presiding Officer's Announcements
Statements of Disqualification – None.
Additions and Deletions – None.
City Attorney Report on Closed Session
Conference With Legal Counsel – Liability Claims (Government Code §54956.95) 1) Claimant: Neil Bernardi-Wright
2) Claimant: Armand Joseph Tiano
Claims against the City of Santa Cruz
Council received a status report, took up under agenda item 18, and no reportable action was taken.
Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code §54957.6) SEIU Temporary Employees
SEIU Service Employees
Mid Managers, OE3
Supervisors, OE3
Fire Management
Fire, IAFF
Police Management
Police Officers Association
Executives
City Negotiator - Lisa Murphy
Council received a status report from the City Negotiator, and took no reportable action.
10.4 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6003
Council Meeting Calendar
6. The City Council reviewed and did not revise the meeting calendar attached to the agenda.
Council Memberships in City Groups and Outside Agencies
7. The Presiding Officer provided Councilmembers with the opportunity to update Council on any external committee meetings that occurred since the last Council meeting
Councilmember Brown: Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC), Monterey Bay Air Resources District.
Councilmember Meyers: Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District Board (METRO), Santa Cruz Mid-County Groundwater Agency, Cowell Working Group.
Councilmember Cummings: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO).
Councilmember Kalantari-Johnson: Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District Board (METRO), Santa Cruz City Schools Committee, Community Action Board.
Vice Mayor Watkins: Santa Cruz City Schools Committee, Santa Cruz Community Farmers’ Market, Housing for Health Partnership.
Mayor Brunner: Ad Hoc Budget and Revenue Committee, Homelessness 2x2 Committee.
Consent Agenda
Councilmember Cummings pulled item 12 for further discussion.
Councilmembers Cummings and Brown made a comment on item 15.
Vice Mayor Watkins and Councilmember Cummings made a comment on item 16.
Councilmember Cummings made a comment on item 19.
Mayor Brunner opened the public comment period. The following people spoke via teleconference:
Sibley Simon spoke regarding item 20.
Unidentified person spoke regarding item 15.
10.5 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6004
Consent Agenda (continued)
Unidentified person spoke regarding item 14.
Mayor Brunner closed the public comment period.
MOTION: Councilmember Meyers moved, seconded by Councilmember Brown, to approve the remaining Consent Agenda.
ACTION: The motion carried with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Cummings, Brown, Meyers (with the exception of item 15); Vice Mayor Watkins; Mayor Brunner.
NOES: Councilmember Meyers (item 15).
ABSENT: Councilmember Golder.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
8. Resolution Extending the Emergency Declaration in Connection with the CZU August Lightning Complex Fire by Sixty (60) Days (CA)
Resolution No. NS-29,940 was adopted extending by sixty days the Local Emergency Declaration in connection with the CZU August Lightning Complex Fire.
9. Resolution Extending the Emergency Declaration in Connection with COVID-19 Pandemic by Sixty (60) Days (CA)
Resolution No. NS-29,941 was adopted extending by sixty days the Declaration of Emergency in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic.
10. Resolution Authorizing the City to Continue Teleconferenced Public Meetings Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361 (CA)
Resolution No. NS-29,942 was adopted authorizing legislative bodies of the City of Santa Cruz to continue the use of teleconferenced meetings pursuant to Assembly Bill 361.
11. Resolution Amending the FY 2022 Budget to Prepare for the Cost of the June 2022 Statewide Primary Election (CC)
Resolution No. NS-29,943 was adopted amending the FY 2022 budget to appropriate funds to cover the cost of the election to be held on June 7, 2022.
10.6 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6005
Consent Agenda (continued)
12. Minutes of the March 8, 2022 City Council Meeting (CC) City Clerk Administrator B. Bush responded to Councilmember questions.
Mayor Brunner opened the public comment period. There were no speakers.
Mayor Brunner closed the public comment period.
MOTION: Councilmember Meyers moved, seconded by Councilmember Brown, to approve as submitted.
ACTION: The motion carried with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Cummings, Brown, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins; Mayor Brunner.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilmember Golder.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
13. U.S. Department of State U.S. Mission Italy, Public Diplomacy Section, Public Diplomacy Grants Program - Grant Acceptance, Authorization, and Appropriation (CM)
Resolution No. NS-29,944 was adopted authorizing the City Manager to apply for, accept, and appropriate funds from the U.S. Department of State U.S.
Mission Italy, Public Diplomacy Section, Public Diplomacy Grants Program to complete a year-long academic and cultural Sister Cities exchange program with Sestri Levante, Italy to focus on art, climate change, and tourism.
14. Urban Sustainability Directors Network Emergent Learning Fund Proposal - Grant Acceptance, Authorization, and Appropriation (CM) Resolution No. NS-29,945 was adopted authorizing the City Manager to apply for, accept, and appropriate funds from the Urban Sustainability Directors Network Emergent Learning Fund to complete a six-month collaborative regional project entitled Centering Justice: Monterey Bay Climate Response.
10.7 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6006
Consent Agenda (continued)
15. A Resolution of Support for Workers at Starbucks in Santa Cruz (CN) Motion carried to:
Adopt Resolution No. NS-29,946 expressing the Santa Cruz City Council’s support for workers at Starbucks in Santa Cruz who are attempting to form a union, and urging Starbucks to accept card check neutrality or allow these workers to hold a free and fair election so they can vote to form a union. Authorize the Mayor to send a letter on behalf of the City Council to the Starbucks Chief Executive Officer in support of the rights of Starbucks workers to form a union.
16. AB 1690 (Rivas) Smoking Waste Pollution Prevention Act (CN) Motion carried to direct the Mayor to send a letter of support urging State Legislators to pass AB 1690, the California Smoking Waste Pollution Prevention Act.
17. City Art of Recovery Design (CARD) Pilot Grant Program Dancing Waters Project (ED)
Motion carried to approve funding the City Art of Recovery Design (CARD) Pilot Grant Project Dancing Waters in the amount of $117,120 from the Water Percent for Art Fund and authorize the City Manager to execute a Sponsorship Agreement for the project, in a form approved by the City Attorney.
18. Liability Claims Filed Against the City of Santa Cruz (FN) Motion carried to reject the liability claims of a) Neil Bernardi-Wright, and b) Armand Joseph Tiano, based on staff recommendation.
19. Establishing Juneteenth as a Citywide Holiday (HR)
Resolution No. NS-29,947 was adopted declaring Juneteenth (June 19) a holiday for all City employees in the City of Santa Cruz.
10.8 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6007
Consent Agenda (continued)
20. Encroachment Permit – Accessibility Improvements for 261 Evergreen Street (APN 001-101-06) (PW)
Resolution No. NS-29,948 was adopted granting an encroachment permit to Sibley Simon for construction and maintenance of ADA accessible parking, hardscape paths, and curb ramp adjacent to 261 Evergreen Street (APN 001- 101-06).
21. Rising Prices for City Vehicle and Equipment Tires and Fuel – Budget Adjustment (PW)
Resolution No. NS-29,949 was adopted amending the FY 2022 budget to appropriate funds in the amount of $365,000 to fund rising fuel expenses and tire purchases.
22. Resource Recovery Facility Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility Upgrade (c402202) – Advertise for Bids and Award Contract (PW) Motion carried to approve the plans and specifications for the Resource Recovery Facility Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility Upgrade (c402202) and authorize staff to advertise for bids and award the contract. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract, in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Public Works Director is authorized to execute change orders within the approved budget.
23. Library Lane Sewer Improvement Project (c402206) – Notice of Completion (PW)
Motion carried to accept the work of Precision Grade, Inc. (San Juan Bautista, CA) and authorize the filling of the Notice of Completion for the Library Lane Sewer Improvement Project (c402206).
10.9 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6008
Consent Agenda (continued)
24. 3rd Quarter FY 2022 Water Department Capital Investment Program Transfer – Budget Adjustment (WT)
Resolution No. NS-29,950 was adopted amending the FY 2022 budget and transferring budget appropriations within the Water Department Capital Investment Program (CIP) to update various project budgets with current cost forecasts.
End Consent Agenda
Public Hearings
25. 2022-2023 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Action Plan (ED)
Principal Management Analyst T. Lake gave a presentation and responded to Councilmember questions.
Mayor Brunner opened the public comment period. There were no speakers.
Mayor Brunner closed the public comment period.
MOTION: Councilmember Meyers moved, seconded by Councilmember Cummings, to make initial funding awards for the 2022-2023 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Annual Action Plan for both Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME).
ACTION: The motion carried with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Cummings, Brown, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins; Mayor Brunner (with the
exception of the application for the Natural Bridges single room occupancy project).
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilmember Golder.
DISQUALIFIED: Mayor Brunner, regarding the application for the Natural Bridges single room occupancy project.
10.10 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6009
Public Hearings (continued)
26. 2nd Reading and Final Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-02 Small Housing Units General Plan, Downtown Plan, Local Coastal Plan, and Zoning Ordinance Updates – Single Room Occupancy, Small Ownership Units, and a New Use Called Flexible Density Units (PL)
Senior Planner S. Neuse gave a presentation and responded to Councilmember questions.
Director of Planning and Community Development L. Butler responded to Councilmember questions.
Mayor Brunner opened the public comment period. The following people spoke.
SPEAKING VIA TELECONFERENCE:
Lira Filippini, Santa Cruz Tomorrow
Rafa Sonnenfeld
Kyle Kelley
Jonah Paten
Unidentified person
Unidentified person
Unidentified person
Candace
Ed Porter
Zennon Ulyate-Crow
Patrick Cady
Unidentified person
Mayor Brunner closed the public comment period.
MOTION: Councilmember Cummings moved, seconded by Councilmember Brown, to table this item to further explore increasing inclusionary deed restricted affordability in these units and until there is clarity on the objective standards, revised corridors plan, and a better understanding of the impacts of the new housing legislation related to density bonus and other housing production measures that will impact neighborhoods and the community.
10.11 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6010
Public Hearings (continued)
26. 2nd Reading and Final Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-02 Small Housing Units General Plan, Downtown Plan, Local Coastal Plan, and Zoning Ordinance Updates – Single Room Occupancy, Small Ownership Units, and a New Use Called Flexible Density Units (PL) (continued)
ACTION: The motion failed with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Cummings, Brown.
NOES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins; Mayor Brunner.
ABSENT: Councilmember Golder.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember Cummings, to direct staff to return to Council at the earliest possible meeting with:
An introduction and first reading of an amendment of Ordinance No. 2022- 02 Title 24 of the Municipal Code regulating small housing units including replacing Small Ownership Units with Flexible Density Units and making minor clarifying amendments to the Single Room Occupancy regulations, with the following revision: increase the inclusionary requirement from 20% to 25% deed restricted affordable units, with the additional 5% dedicated to very low-or extremely low-income units;
An amended resolution authorizing and directing the City Manager to submit Ordinance No. 2022-02 and changes to the Downtown Plan as Local Coastal Implementation Plan Amendments to the California Coastal Commission for final certification, with the increased inclusionary percentages for Flexible Density Units (FDU); and
Any requisite changes to the City's inclusionary ordinance to reflect the percentage increase for the newly established Flexible Density Units housing type.
MOTION: Councilmember Meyers moved, seconded by Councilmember Kalantari-Johnson, to call the question.
10.12 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6011
Public Hearings (continued)
26. 2nd Reading and Final Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-02 Small Housing Units General Plan, Downtown Plan, Local Coastal Plan, and Zoning Ordinance Updates – Single Room Occupancy, Small Ownership Units, and a New Use Called Flexible Density Units (PL) (continued)
ACTION: The motion to call the question carried with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins; Mayor Brunner.
NOES: Councilmembers Cummings, Brown.
ABSENT: Councilmember Golder.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
ACTION: Councilmember Brown’s motion failed with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Cummings, Brown.
NOES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins; Mayor Brunner.
ABSENT: Councilmember Golder.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
MOTION: Councilmember Meyers moved, seconded by Councilmember Kalantari-Johnson, to:
Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-02 amending Title 24 of the Municipal Code regulating small housing units including replacing Small Ownership Units with Flexible Density Units and making minor clarifying amendments to the Single Room Occupancy regulations.
Adopt Resolution No. NS-29,951 authorizing and directing the City Manager to submit Ordinance No. 2022-02 and changes to the Downtown Plan as Local Coastal Implementation Plan Amendments to the California Coastal Commission for final certification.
ACTION: The motion carried with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins; Mayor Brunner.
NOES: Councilmembers Cummings, Brown.
ABSENT: Councilmember Golder.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
10.13 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6012
Public Hearings (continued)
27. Municipal Code Amendments Relating to Small Cell Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Responding to Modifications Requested by the California Coastal Commission (PL)
MOTION: Councilmember Watkins moved, seconded by Councilmember Kalantari-Johnson, to continue this item to the meeting of April 12, 2022.
ACTION: The motion carried with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Cummings, Brown, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins; Mayor Brunner.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilmember Golder.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
28. Review and Accept the Final Parks and Recreation Department FY 2021 Annual Report (PR)
MOTION: Councilmember Watkins moved, seconded by Councilmember Kalantari-Johnson, to continue this item to the meeting of April 12, 2022.
ACTION: The motion carried with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Cummings, Brown, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins; Mayor Brunner.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilmember Golder.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
10.14 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6013
General Business (continued)
29. Expiration of Statewide Evictions Moratorium – Additional Legal Aid and Support for Tenants Affected by COVID-19 (CM/CA)
City Attorney T. Condotti spoke and responded to Councilmember questions.
Housing and Community Development Manager J. de Wit responded to Councilmember questions.
Mayor Brunner opened the public comment period. The following people spoke.
SPEAKING VIA TELECONFERENCE:
Barbara Meisler, COPA
Elizabeth, COPA
Raymon Cancino
Unidentified person
Tonje Wold-Switzer
Mayor Brunner closed the public comment period.
MOTION: Councilmember Meyers moved, seconded by Councilmember Cummings, to:
Direct the City Manager to engage in a regional eviction protection effort with the County and other jurisdictions regarding preventing people from being evicted and bring back to Council monetary contribution on those efforts.
Request an update from State legislatures as soon as possible on efforts related to March 31st deadline.
FRIENDLY AMENDMENT: Councilmember Cummings requested to add direction for the Mayor to write a letter to Assemblymember Stone, Senator Laird, and Governor Newsom expressing the need to extend the COVID-19 eviction protection for individuals who have applied for state rental assistance and urge them to do what is within their power to urge the State Assembly and Senate to take this up as an emergency item during session to extend the eviction protections until the applications have been completed and funds have been distributed. Councilmember Meyers accepted.
10.15 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6014
General Business (continued)
29. Expiration of Statewide Evictions Moratorium – Additional Legal Aid and Support for Tenants Affected by COVID-19 (CM/CA) (continued) ACTION: The motion carried with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Golder, Cummings, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins; Mayor Brunner.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilmember Brown.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
MOTION: Councilmember Cummings moved, seconded by Councilmember Brown, to direct staff to bring back an emergency ordinance to provide eviction protections for individuals who have applied for COVID-19 rental assistance and have not yet received their assistance on or before the first meeting in April that would be retroactive to April 1, 2022 and bring back an item to determine whether an extension or sunset is necessary at the first meeting in August and change the eviction notice period from 3 days to 15 days to allow more time for tenants who have submitted applications for COVID-19 rental assistance to learn their options and reduce mental stress.
ACTION: The motion failed with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Cummings, Brown.
NOES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Golder, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins; Mayor Brunner.
ABSENT: None.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
Councilmember Kalantari-Johnson stated for the record her no vote is due to the legal constraints that Council heard from the City Attorney.
MOTION: Councilmember Cummings moved, seconded by Councilmember Brown, to direct the Mayor to write a letter to the presiding judge of the County Courts to promote and recommend mediation services prior to submitting an Unlawful Detainer (UD) with the goal of resolving disputes and avoiding evictions.
10.16 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6015
General Business (continued)
29. Expiration of Statewide Evictions Moratorium – Additional Legal Aid and Support for Tenants Affected by COVID-19 (CM/CA) (continued) ACTION: The motion carried unanimously with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Golder, Cummings, Brown, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins; Mayor Brunner.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
Closed Session
30. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Government Code §54956.9(d)(1))
Don’t Morph the Wharf! v. City of Santa Cruz et al.
(Santa Cruz County Superior Court Case No. 20CV02731)
Recess - The City Council recessed at 5:38 p.m. to the 6:30 p.m. session.
10.17 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6016
City Council
6:30 PM
Call to Order – Mayor Brunner called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m. via Zoom.
Roll Call
Present: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson (via Zoom), Golder (arrived at 6:38 p.m. via Zoom), Cummings (via Zoom), Brown (via Zoom), Meyers (via Zoom); Vice Mayor Watkins (via Zoom); Mayor Brunner (via Zoom).
Absent: None.
Staff: City Manager M. Huffaker (via Zoom), Assistant City Manager L. Schmidt (via Zoom), City Attorney T. Condotti (via Zoom), Interim Director of Finance B. Magee (via Zoom), Director of Information Technology K.
Morgan (via Zoom), Director of Planning and Community Development L. Butler (via Zoom), Human Resources Director L. Murphy (via Zoom), Interim Fire Chief R. Oatey (via Zoom), Director of Parks and Recreation T. Elliot (via Zoom), Interim Chief of Police B. Escalante (via Zoom), Assistant Director of Public Works and City Engineer N. Nguyen (via Zoom), Senior Planner K. Donovan (via Zoom), Principal Planner M.
VanHua (via Zoom), Communications Manager E. Smith (via Zoom), Deputy City Attorney C. Bronson (via Zoom), Deputy City Clerk Administrator J. Wood, City Clerk Administrator B. Bush (via Zoom).
Oral Communications Announcement - The Mayor provided a brief announcement about Oral Communications.
Oral Communications
At 6:34 p.m. Mayor Brunner opened Oral Communications for members of the public who wished to speak regarding items not listed on the City Council agenda.
Unidentified person spoke regarding private business labor relations relating to union formation, water budget revenue, and the Black Lives Matter movement.
At 6:38 p.m. Mayor Brunner closed Oral Communications.
10.18 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6017
General Business
31. Annual Housing Element and General Plan Progress Reports (PL) Senior Planner K. Donovan gave a presentation and responded to Councilmember questions.
Principal Planner M. VanHua responded to Councilmember questions.
Mayor Brunner opened the public comment period. There were no speakers.
Mayor Brunner closed the public comment period.
MOTION: Councilmember Cummings moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Watkins, to accept the 2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Reports and direct staff to submit the reports to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research and the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
ACTION: The motion carried unanimously with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Golder, Cummings, Brown, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins; Mayor Brunner.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
32. Sidewalk Vending Ordinance, Program, and Resource Request (CM) Communications Manager E. Smith, Director of Parks and Recreation T. Elliot, and Deputy City Attorney C. Bronson gave a presentation and responded to Councilmember questions.
Interim Chief of Police B. Escalante, Assistant Director of Public Works and City Engineer N. Nguyen, and Director of Planning and Community Development L.
Butler responded to Councilmember questions.
Mayor Brunner opened the public comment period. The following person spoke.
SPEAKING VIA TELECONFERENCE:
Unidentified person
Mayor Brunner closed the public comment period.
10.19 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6018
General Business (continued)
32. Sidewalk Vending Ordinance, Program, and Resource Request (CM) (continued) MOTION: Councilmember Cummings moved, seconded by Councilmember Brown, to:
Introduce for publication Ordinance No. 2022-03 repealing Santa Cruz Municipal Code (“SCMC”) Chapter 5.81 (“Vending and Display Devices on City Property”) and adding SCMC Chapter 5.82 (“Sidewalk Vending”), with the following changes related to restricted vending times and locations under 5.82.080:
5.82.080(a)(4) Year round, on public property in areas that are zoned exclusively residential, including within residentially zoned parks; and 5.82.080(b)(1) From April 1 until October 31, on the streets and sidewalks of Beach Street between the Municipal Wharf and Third Street without a permit and outside demarcated areas and display zones as set out by the Parks and Recreation Department. 5.82.080(b)(4) Year round, on the Beach Street Promenade Deck without a permit and outside demarcated areas and display zones as set out by the Parks and Recreation Department.
5.82.090(a) An additional parks vending permit is required for sidewalk vendors who wish to operate in a City park, beach, or other facility within the jurisdiction of the Parks and Recreation Department, including that portion of the Beach Street sidewalk operated by the Parks and Recreation Department, between the Municipal Wharf and Third St. No person may vend in a City park, City beach, or facility within the jurisdiction of the Parks and Recreation Department without first obtaining a parks vending permit.”
5.82.110 One hundred dollars ($100) for a first violation, after warning.
Adopt Resolution No. NS-29,952 creating a new sidewalk vending permit fee required upon issuance of a sidewalk vending permit; and Adopt Resolution No. NS-29,953 to amend the FY 2022 budget to appropriate funds and authorize the City Manager or their designee to complete necessary actions for the resources requested per costs associated with an e-citation platform and devices, permit materials, contract Code Compliance and security staff, and other expenditures; and
10.20 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6019
General Business (continued)
32. Sidewalk Vending Ordinance, Program, and Resource Request (CM) (continued) MOTION (continued):
Direct staff to return to Council with FY 2023 requests, as part of the regular budget and personnel complement change process, to support operational needs for one Senior Code Compliance Specialist, contract Code Compliance staff, contract security staff, and other expenditures. Direct the Parks and Recreation Department to draft a resolution establishing a limited vending zone and/or City-demarcated vending and display zones on the sidewalks of Beach Street and Beach Street Promenade Deck between the Municipal Wharf and Third Street and provide free permits to vendors who paid in 2021 due to program failures.
After discussion with staff, the motion was amended as follows:
MOTION: Councilmember Cummings moved, seconded by Councilmember Brown, to:
Introduce for publication Ordinance No. 2022-03 repealing Santa Cruz Municipal Code (“SCMC”) Chapter 5.81 (“Vending and Display Devices on City Property”) and adding SCMC Chapter 5.82 (“Sidewalk Vending”), with the following changes related to restricted vending times and locations under 5.82.080:
5.82.080(a)(4) Year round, on public property in areas that are zoned exclusively residential, including within residentially zoned parks; and
5.82.080(b)(1) From April 1 until October 31, on the streets and sidewalks of Beach Street between the Municipal Wharf and Third Street without a permit and outside demarcated areas and display zones as set out the by the Parks and Recreation Department. 5.82.080(b)(4) Year round, on the Beach Street Promenade Deck without a permit and outside demarcated areas and display zones as set out by the Parks and Recreation Department.
10.21 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6020
General Business (continued)
32. Sidewalk Vending Ordinance, Program, and Resource Request (CM) (continued) MOTION (continued):
5.82.090(a) An additional parks vending permit is required for sidewalk vendors who wish to operate in a City park, beach, or other facility within the jurisdiction of the Parks and Recreation Department, including that portion of the Beach Street sidewalk operated by the Parks and Recreation Department, between the Municipal Wharf and Third St. No person may vend in a City park, City beach, or facility within the jurisdiction of the Parks and Recreation Department without first obtaining a parks vending permit.”
5.82.110 One hundred dollars ($100) for a first violation. Adopt Resolution No. NS-29,952 creating a new sidewalk vending permit fee required upon issuance of a sidewalk vending permit; and Adopt Resolution No. NS-29,953 to amend the FY 2022 budget to appropriate funds and authorize the City Manager or their designee to complete necessary actions for the resources requested per costs associated with an e-citation platform and devices, permit materials, contract Code Compliance and security staff, and other expenditures; and Direct staff to return to Council with FY 2023 requests, as part of the regular budget and personnel complement change process, to support operational needs for one Senior Code Compliance Specialist, contract Code Compliance staff, contract security staff, and other expenditures. Direct the Parks and Recreation Department to draft a resolution establishing a limited vending zone and/or City-demarcated vending and display zones on the sidewalks of Beach Street and Beach Street Promenade Deck between the Municipal Wharf and Third Street.
10.22 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6021
General Business (continued)
32. Sidewalk Vending Ordinance, Program, and Resource Request (CM) (continued) SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Councilmember Golder moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Watkins, to:
Introduce for publication Ordinance No. 2022-03 repealing Santa Cruz Municipal Code (“SCMC”) Chapter 5.81 (“Vending and Display Devices on City Property”) and adding SCMC Chapter 5.82 (“Sidewalk Vending”); with the following change:
5.82.090(a): “An additional parks vending permit is required for sidewalk vendors who wish to operate in a City park, beach, or other facility within the jurisdiction of the Parks and Recreation Department, including that portion of the Beach Street sidewalk operated by the Parks and Recreation Department, between the Municipal Wharf and Third St. No person may vend in a City park, City beach, or facility within the jurisdiction of the Parks and Recreation Department without first obtaining a parks vending permit.”
Adopt Resolution No. NS-29,952 creating a new sidewalk vending permit fee required upon issuance of a sidewalk vending permit; and Adopt Resolution No. NS-29,953 to amend the FY 2022 budget to appropriate funds and authorize the City Manager or their designee to complete necessary actions for the resources requested per costs associated with an e-citation platform and devices, permit materials, contract Code Compliance and security staff, and other expenditures; and Direct staff to return to Council with FY 2023 requests, as part of the regular budget and personnel complement change process, to support operational needs for one Senior Code Compliance Specialist, contract Code Compliance staff, contract security staff, and other expenditures.
ACTION: The motion to accept the substitute motion carried with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Golder, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins.
NOES: Councilmembers Cummings, Brown; Mayor Brunner.
ABSENT: None.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
10.23 March 22, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6022
General Business (continued)
32. Sidewalk Vending Ordinance, Program, and Resource Request (CM) (continued) ACTION: The substitute motion carried with the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Golder, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins.
NOES: Councilmembers Cummings, Brown; Mayor Brunner.
ABSENT: None.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
Councilmember Cummings stated for the record he’s been in conversation with staff about the language of the motion, and stated it is the role as Councilmembers to hear from the public and to make changes to staff recommendations when it’s appropriate, and the language of the motion he made is based on input from the public and the community.
Councilmember Brown stated for the record that it is her understanding that the role of City Council is to legislate and deliberate and do Council’s business in public. Sometimes it is messy, and sometimes it takes a long time. But deliberating and sometimes wordsmithing agenda items is common practice. It has never been questioned if Council has a right to do it; it’s always been their responsibility.
Adjournment - The City Council adjourned at 9:05 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted:
Julia Wood, Deputy City Clerk Administrator
Attest:
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
Approved:
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
10.24 MINUTES ARE UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED BY COUNCIL
City of Santa Cruz
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, California 95060
MINUTES OF A CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
March 29, 2022
3:00 PM
Call to Order – Mayor Brunner called the meeting to order at 3:02 p.m. via Zoom.
Roll Call
Present: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson (via Zoom), Golder (via Zoom), Cummings (via Zoom), Brown (via Zoom); Vice Mayor Watkins (arrived at 3:32 p.m. via Zoom); Mayor Brunner (via Zoom).
Absent: Councilmember Meyers.
Staff: City Manager M. Huffaker (via Zoom), Assistant City Manager L. Schmidt (via Zoom), City Attorney T. Condotti (via Zoom), Interim Chief of Police B. Escalante (via Zoom), Director of Planning and Community Development L. Butler (via Zoom), Interim Fire Chief R. Oatey (via Zoom), Water Director R. Menard (via Zoom), Director of Parks and Recreation T. Elliot (via Zoom), Sustainability and Climate Action Manager T. Wise-West (via Zoom) Deputy City Clerk Administrator J.
Wood, City Clerk Administrator B. Bush (via Zoom).
General Business
1. Climate Action Plan 2030 (CM)
Sustainability and Climate Action Manager T. Wise-West gave a presentation and responded to Councilmember questions.
Mayor Brunner opened the public comment period. The following people spoke.
SPEAKING VIA TELECONFERENCE:
Unidentified person
Unidentified person
Kyle Kelley
Mayor Brunner closed the public comment period.
11.1 March 29, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6024
Adjournment - The City Council adjourned at 4:08 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted:
Julia Wood, Deputy City Clerk Administrator
Attest:
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
Approved:
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
11.2 MINUTES ARE UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED BY COUNCIL
City of Santa Cruz
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, California 95060
MINUTES OF A CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
March 29, 2022
4:30 PM
Call to Order – Mayor Brunner called the meeting to order at 4:31 p.m. via Zoom.
Roll Call
Present: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson (via Zoom), Golder (via Zoom), Cummings (via Zoom), Brown (via Zoom), Meyers (left at 6:02 p.m. via Zoom); Vice Mayor Watkins (via Zoom); Mayor Brunner (via Zoom).
Absent: None.
Staff: City Manager M. Huffaker (via Zoom), Assistant City Manager L. Schmidt (via Zoom), City Attorney T. Condotti (via Zoom), Interim Finance Director B. Magee (via Zoom), Director of Information Technology K.
Morgan (via Zoom), Interim Fire Chief R. Oatey (via Zoom), Director of Parks and Recreation T. Elliot (via Zoom), Principal Management Analyst C. Hemard (via Zoom), Deputy City Clerk Administrator J. Wood, City Clerk Administrator B. Bush (via Zoom).
Public Hearings
1. Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Selection of a Six-District Map and Election Sequence (CN)
Principal Management Analyst C. Hemard introduced the item and responded to Councilmember questions.
Doug Johnson, Demographer with National Demographics Corporation, gave a presentation and responded to Councilmember questions.
City Attorney T. Condotti responded to Councilmember questions.
12.1 March 29, 2022 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES 6026 Public Hearings (continued)
1. Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Selection of a Six-District Map and Election Sequence (CN) (continued) Mayor Brunner opened the public comment period. The following people spoke.
SPEAKING VIA TELECONFERENCE:
Unidentified person
Rafa Sonnenfeld
Unidentified person
[unintelligible]
Unidentified person
Unidentified person
Unidentified person
Katherine
Unidentified person
Unidentified person.
Mayor Brunner closed the public comment period.
2. Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Selection of a Seven-District Map and Election Sequence (CN)
Doug Johnson, Demographer with National Demographics Corporation, gave a presentation and responded to Councilmember questions.
Mayor Brunner opened the public comment period. The following people spoke.
SPEAKING VIA TELECONFERENCE:
Unidentified person
[unintelligible]
Unidentified person
Mayor Brunner closed the public comment period.
Principal Management Analyst C. Hemard responded to Councilmember questions.
City Attorney T. Condotti responded to Councilmember questions.
12.2 March 29, 2022 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES 6027 Adjournment - The City Council adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted:
Julia Wood, Deputy City Clerk Administrator
Attest:
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
Approved:
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
12.3 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: City Council
SUBJECT: Resolution Declaring the City Council’s Intent Regarding Possible Proceeds from Measure F, a Sales and Use Tax Ballot Item on the June 2022 California Statewide Primary Election (CN)
RECOMMENDATION: Resolution declaring the City Council’s intent regarding the use of potential revenues generated by Measure F, a sales and use tax ballot item on the June 2022 California Statewide Primary Election.
BACKGROUND: On March 8, 2022, the City Council declared a fiscal emergency and requested that that the consolidated June 2022 California statewide primary election include a general purpose one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax measure to move from the City’s current 9.25 percent sales tax rate to 9.75 should the measure pass. Subsequently, the measure was designated as Measure F.
Under Article XIII-A of the California Constitution (Propositions 13 and 218), if a local tax is limited for a specific purpose, it can only be levied if approved by a two-thirds vote. The sales and use tax measure (Measure F) being proposed on the June 2022 California Statewide Primary has been submitted to the voters as a general tax with revenues therefore legally available for general governmental purposes. Under these circumstances the ballot measure could be adopted by a majority vote of City electors.
To provide general, non-binding guidelines to the voters as to possible uses of the revenues generated by Measure F should it be adopted, the Council Ad Hoc Budget and Revenue Committee (Committee) is recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution of intent.
DISCUSSION: To align with the January 2022 community poll results, the Committee is recommending that the resolution of intent focuses on the following: mitigating the impacts of homelessness; the need for more affordable and workforce housing; downtown and business support; actions to help address the high cost of housing in Santa Cruz; reduction of wildfire risk; maintenance of City facilities and essential infrastructure such as streets, transit, parks and recreation facilities for youth and seniors; and prevention of reduction to important city services.
Health in All Policies (HiAP) – This potential ballot measure supports the City’s ability to positively impact Santa Cruz’s integral values of equity, public health, and sustainability (from the City’s Health in All Policies program). Critically important existing services, potential new services, and capital programs can all offer equity, health, and sustainability value to community
13.1 members. Examples include: housing for low and very low income levels, as well as workforce housing; homelessness services for care and sheltering; preventative maintenance of natural resources; environmental clean-up and remediation; integrated outreach and assistance across the City and within Downtown specifically; wildfire prevention education and implementation.
FISCAL IMPACT: While the proposed sales and use tax ballot measure would generate additional revenue for City’s General Fund if it passes, the resolution of intent is not binding and has no fiscal impact.
Submitted By:
Sonja Brunner
Mayor
Submitted By:
Sandy Brown
Councilmember
Submitted By:
Martine Watkins
Vice Mayor
ATTACHMENTS:
1. RESOLUTION OF INTENT.DOCX
13.2 RESOLUTION NO. NSRESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL’S GOALS AND INTENT REGARDING USE OF REVENUES POTENTIALLY GENERATED BY THE JUNE 2022 RETAIL TRANSACTIONS AND USE
TAX BALLOT MEASURE (NON-BINDING)
WHEREAS, the City has experienced revenue disruption and significant increases in expenses due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the CZU Lightning Complex Fire; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Cruz faces a daunting fiscal picture that requires major structural changes in the way that the City finances and provides services; and WHEREAS, given the City’s financial difficulties, the City Council created the Ad Hoc Budget and Revenue Committee comprising Mayor Brunner, Vice Mayor Watkins, and Councilmember Brown to ascertain the City’s most pressing financial needs, and to propose measures by which the revenue necessary to address those needs might be generated; and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2022, the City Council, by unanimous vote:
Accepted a report regarding the recent work of the City Council Ad Hoc Budget and Revenue Committee; and
Adopted a resolution making emergency findings for placing a general purpose one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax measure on the June 7, 2022 election; and Adopted a resolution requesting that the consolidated June 2022 California statewide primary election include a general purpose one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax measure; and
Supported the measure for the purpose of authorizing arguments; provide direction regarding the authors; directing the City Attorney to prepare the impartial analysis; and providing direction to the City Manager regarding the preparation of the fiscal analysis, as appropriate.
WHEREAS, per Resolution No. NS-29,939, the City has placed the ballot item, now named Measure F, on the June 7, 2022 California Statewide Primary so that the current City retail transactions and use tax be increased by one-half of one percent should the voters adopt it; and WHEREAS, the retail transactions and use tax increase proposed to City voters in the June 2022 are “general taxes” for purposed of the California Constitution meaning that revenues generated by those tax measures must be deposited in the City’s General Fund and be legally available to underwrite all of the City’s general operations, services, and programs and that said revenues cannot be legally restricted to particular earmarked operations, services, or programs; and
13.3 RESOLUTION NO. NSWHEREAS, the revenue generated by this measure may help with: mitigating the impacts of homelessness; the need for more affordable and workforce housing; downtown and business support; actions to help address the high cost of housing in Santa Cruz; reduction of wildfire risk; maintenance of City facilities and essential infrastructure such as streets, transit, parks and recreation facilities for youth and seniors; and prevention of reduction to important city services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz that this City Council hereby states that it is its intent and goal, and it hereby strongly encourages all future City Councils which it cannot bind by adoption of this Resolution, that upon adoption of the June 2022 retail transactions and use tax measure, the City will use the revenue generated by Measure F for general City operations, services and programs, and as outlined above.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
APPROVED: __________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: ______________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
13.4 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Gillian Greensite <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 1:21 PM
To: City Council; Sonja Brunner; Martine Watkins; Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson; Sandy Brown; [email protected]; Donna Meyers; Renee Golder Subject: Consent Agenda Item #13
Dear Mayor and City Council members,
This letter refers to Consent Agenda item, #13: Resolution declaring the city council’s intent regarding the use of potential revenues generated by Measure F, a sales and use tax ballot item on the June 2022 California Statewide Primary Election.
Many in the community, including myself as one of the signatories on the ballot opposing this sales tax increase, have noticed an attempt by its supporters to deceive the public into believing that, if passed, the sales tax monies will be spent on specific programs deemed popular in the polls. You are well aware that this is not legal without a two thirds vote in support of Measure F.
This Resolution furthers the deception and is unbecoming for an elected body. The Resolution states its intent:
”to provide general non-binding guidelines to the voters as to possible uses of the revenue generated by Measure F should it be adopted.”
The only guideline the voters need is honesty from its elected officials. As voting day draws closer, the operative words, "non-binding" and “possible uses" will be overshadowed by the list of popular programs that an unsuspecting public will believe are going to be funded if they vote yes.
The last paragraph in the Resolution, under Discussion, drawing on Health in all Policies furthers the manipulation. Not only is a regressive sales tax by definition the opposite of equity, which is supposedly a cornerstone of HiAP, but the list of popular programs is repeated as “guidelines” to the voters.
Abraham Lincoln’s quote about “fooling people” seems to apply here.
Regards,
Gillian Greensite
13.5 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Ron Pomerantz <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 1:47 PM
To: City Council
Subject: April 12, 2022 Council Agenda item #13: Resolution declaring the City Council’s intent regarding the use of potential revenues generated by Measure F, a sales and use tax ballot item on the June 2022 California Statewide Primary Election Re. April 12, 2022 Council Agenda item #13: Resolution declaring the City Council’s intent regarding the use of potential revenues generated by Measure F, a sales and use tax ballot item on the June 2022 California Statewide Primary Election.
Good day Councilmembers and Mayor Brunner.
Your previous Council action regarding a sales tax increase falsely declared a fiscal emergency in order to put this sales tax increase as Measure F on this June ballot. The current on-going situation is not an emergency. The fiscal emergency started years ago when staff said the City’s pension fund costs would severely harm the budget. Little was done in the intervening years to fully correct this situation. There’s nothing in this resolution of intent that addresses the pension issue. Was this crying wolf, or do not intend to address this financial problem?
This agenda item appears as yet another ploy to fool voters that the .5% sales tax increase will be used for the delineated purposes based on a poll you commissioned. If the Council truly wanted to specify and lock-in how the sales tax increase would be used, you would have clearly and honestly spelled it out on the ballot. As the staff report says the problem with this approach is State law requires the sales tax increase would have needed a 2/3’s vote from the electorate. The City’s own polling showed a 2/3’s vote would not pass. This agenda seems to say you are worried that getting a simple majority vote may be problem.
The sales tax increase will predominantly harm poor students, low wage workers, and the struggling families because it’s a regressive tax. These folks will receive minimal benefits yet pay a disproportionate part of their income for this sales tax increase as opposed the higher income and wealthier folks. This sales tax increase goes hand-in-hand with the highest inflation rate in some 40 years further compounding harm to their well-being. This is a clear violation of the Health in all Policies that values and requires EQUITY as a cornerstone.
This agenda item was not even placed on the agenda as a General Business agenda item, rather it was placed as a Consent Item. Was this an attempt to slide it thorough without public scrutiny? To quote your staff report: “... the resolution of intent is not binding...” So why the pretense? Thank you for your time and consideration.
Ron Pomerantz
13.6 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Jennie Munster
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 2:43 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Resolution of intent related to revenue measure (Item#13) Importance: High
Hello Council Members,
As a member of OE3 Supervisory Unit and a City Employee for the past 12 years I want to suggest that language be included that allocates revenue to not only to keep essential services operational but also that City workers are fairly compensated at wages that are competitive with other agencies across our region. The City can’t function without employees. We have made sacrifices during 2020 and continue to make them in response to COVID related issues. We do this even though our workloads keep increasing with little compensation to show for it. We do this because we care about our jobs and we care about the City of Santa Cruz. If we don’t do the work, who will.
Jennie Munster
President, OE3 Supervisors
QA/QC Chemists/Wastewater Treatment Plant/Public Works
831‐420‐6040 (Office)
13.7 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Amanda R. Bird
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 2:59 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Resolution of intent related to revenue measure (Item#13) TO: Council Members
SUBJECT: Resolution of intent related to revenue measure (Item#13) As a member of OE3 Supervisory Unit and a City Employee for the past 2.5 years I want to suggest that language be included that allocates revenue to not only to keep essential services operational but also that City workers are fairly compensated at wages that are competitive with other agencies across our region. The City cannot function without employees. We have made sacrifices during 2020 and continue to make them in response to COVID related issues. We do this even though our workloads keep increasing with little compensation to show for it. We do this because we care about our jobs and we care about the City of Santa Cruz. If we do not do the work, who will.
Amanda Bird
Senior Wastewater Treatment Operator IV/Public Works
Amanda Bird, MSEM
Senior Wastewater Treatment Operator IV
Interim Operations Supervisor
City of Santa Cruz
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Email – [email protected]
Phone – 831-420-6043
13.8 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Victor Albers
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 3:10 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Resolution of intent related to revenue measure (Item#13) TO: Council Members, [email protected]
SUBJECT: Resolution of intent related to revenue measure (Item#13) As a member of OE3 Supervisory Unit and a City Employee for the past five and a half years, I want to suggest that language be included that allocates revenue to not only to keep essential services operational but also that City workers are fairly compensated at wages that are competitive with other agencies across our region. The City can’t function without employees and the City is experiencing difficulty in attracting and retaining good employees. Additionally we made sacrifices during 2020, e.g. a 10% pay cut, and continue to make them in response to COVID related issues. We do this even though our workloads keep increasing with little compensation to show for it. We do this because we care about our jobs and we care about the City of Santa Cruz. If we don’t do the work, who will.
Sincerely,
Victor L. Albers
Crew Lead
Open Space Team (OST)
City of Santa Cruz
Parks and Recreation Department
335 Evergreen St.
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
831‐420‐6208 (Office)
831‐212‐8688 (Mobile)
[email protected]
13.9 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Dominic Gullo
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 3:26 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Resolution of intent related to revenue measure (Item#13) SUBJECT: Resolution of intent related to revenue measure (Item#13) As a member of OE3 Supervisory Unit and a City Employee for the past 7 years, I want to suggest that language be included that allocates revenue to not only to keep essential services operational but also that City workers are fairly compensated at wages that are competitive with other agencies across our region. The City can’t function without employees. We have made sacrifices during 2020 and continue to make them in response to COVID related issues. We do this even though our workloads keep increasing with little compensation to show for it. We do this because we care about our jobs and we care about the City of Santa Cruz. If we don’t do the work, who will.
Thank you,
Dominic Gullo
Service Field Crew Leader
Santa Cruz Civic Auditorium
City of Santa Cruz Parks & Recreation
Maintenance office: 831-420-5244
Work Cell: 831-212-5303
13.10 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Dominic Gullo
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 3:26 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Resolution of intent related to revenue measure (Item#13) SUBJECT: Resolution of intent related to revenue measure (Item#13) As a member of OE3 Supervisory Unit and a City Employee for the past 7 years, I want to suggest that language be included that allocates revenue to not only to keep essential services operational but also that City workers are fairly compensated at wages that are competitive with other agencies across our region. The City can’t function without employees. We have made sacrifices during 2020 and continue to make them in response to COVID related issues. We do this even though our workloads keep increasing with little compensation to show for it. We do this because we care about our jobs and we care about the City of Santa Cruz. If we don’t do the work, who will.
Thank you,
Dominic Gullo
Service Field Crew Leader
Santa Cruz Civic Auditorium
City of Santa Cruz Parks & Recreation
Maintenance office: 831-420-5244
Work Cell: 831-212-5303
13.11 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Daniel Lawson-Thomas
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 4:26 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Resolution of Intent Related to Revenue Measure (4/12/22 meeting Item 13) Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,
As a member of OE3 Supervisory Unit and a City Employee for nearly 15 years, I want to suggest that language be included that allocates revenue to not only to keep essential services operational but also that City workers are fairly compensated at wages that are competitive with other agencies across our region. The City can’t function without employees. We have made sacrifices during 2020 and continue to make them in response to COVID related issues. We do this even though our workloads keep increasing with little compensation to show for it. We do this because we care about our jobs and we care about the City of Santa Cruz. If we don’t do the work, who will.
It is disheartening that this language isn’t already included when Matt has implied it would be: “The City will need to expand our resources to provide compensation increases in the future, as well as the growing cost to provide city services which is why the revenue measure is so important to the City.” –Matt Huffaker, Response to City‐Wide meeting from 3/7/22.
I would like to further point out that when comparing compensation studies (2018 & 2022), SEIU received a 2% improvement, OE3 Supervisors a 5% improvement however mid‐managers and executives received a 14% & 9% improvement respectively. While looking at the tax measure objectives, it is clear that SEIU and OE3 Supervisory employees will be doing the bulk of the work that has been promised to our community should the tax measure be passed. We’ve received multiple emails regarding how we’ve improved our compensation when compared to 2018, but this is solely due to the increases made at the Executive and Mid‐Manager level: “The council is committed to maintaining the City’s ability to recruit and retain high‐quality employees as demonstrated in our recent compensation survey, which shows an overall improvement since the previous compensation study in 2018, the City moved from ‐14.6% below the market median to ‐7% below the market median in total compensation.” –Matt Huffaker, Response to City‐ Wide meeting from 3/7/22.
I would like to see the language modified to indicate that the proposed tax funds will go to increasing the salaries of SEIU & OE3 Supervisory employees.
Thank you for all for your service to our City!
Respectfully,
DC Lawson‐Thomas
Daniel Lawson-Thomas
Recreation Supervisor – Sports & Beaches
City of Santa Cruz
Parks & Recreation Mission:
To provide quality public spaces and experiences that build a healthy community, foster equity, and better the environment
13.12 2
13.13 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Heather Pereira <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 4:32 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Resolution of intent related to revenue measure (Item#13) TO: Council Members
SUBJECT: Resolution of intent related to revenue measure (Item#13) As a member of OE3 Supervisory Unit and a City Employee for the past eight years I want to suggest that language be included that allocates revenue to not only to keep essential services operational but also that City workers are fairly compensated at wages that are competitive with other agencies across our region. The City can’t function without employees. We have made sacrifices during 2020 and continue to make them in response to COVID related issues. We do this even though our workloads keep increasing with little compensation to show for it. We do this because we care about our jobs and we care about the City of Santa Cruz. If we don’t do the work, who will?
Heather Pereira
Branch Manager, Library Assistant lll
Santa Cruz Public Library
--
Heather Pereira
SCPL Training Coordinator
Branch Manager, Aptos Branch Library
831-427-7700, x7721
Library Headquarters on Monday, Wednesday & Friday.
Working remotely on Tuesday & Thursday.
Thank you
13.14 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: City Council
SUBJECT: Resolution Condemning Antisemitism (CN)
RECOMMENDATION: Resolution condemning antisemitism and expressing solidarity with the Jewish people in the community, in the United States, and around the globe.
BACKGROUND: Antisemitism is a growing threat around the world. Communities from Colleyville, Texas to Santa Cruz County have witnessed troubling incidents of antisemitism this year. Members of our Jewish community are fearful of the current uptick in hateful incidents and rhetoric. As such we believe the Santa Cruz City Council should strongly condemn all forms of discrimination and hate, including antisemitism.
DISCUSSION: Antisemitism is a form of hate faced by Jews simply because they are Jewish, often involving the use of stereotypes, tropes, and myths. According to a study released in October by the American Jewish Committee, nearly one in four Jewish Americans said they experienced antisemitism in the past year. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has stated that more than 50 percent of religious-based hate crimes in 2020 targeted Jewish Americans, who make up no more than 2 percent of the U.S. population.
According to the Anti-Defamation League, 2,024 antisemitic incidents were reported nationwide in 2020 – the third highest year on record – and 289 incidents occurred in California. In the past month, the college campuses of UC Santa Cruz and Cabrillo College’s Watsonville campus have both experienced acts of antisemitic vandalism.
These issues extend well beyond Santa Cruz County. On January 15, 2022, in Colleyville, Texas, a man with a gun entered Congregation Beth Israel during services and took three congregants and a rabbi as hostages. Other recent antisemitic incidents have included fliers at Santa Monica elementary schools linking Jewish people to the COVID-19 pandemic and the anti-vaccine movement and, in Santa Rosa, vandalism of a Holocaust Memorial statue. Last year in Los Angeles, two Jewish diners were assaulted outside a restaurant after the assailants asked who among the diners was Jewish.
The Santa Cruz community is home to a number of storied Jewish organizations and institutions.
Jewish neighbors in our own community are fearful of the current uptick in antisemitic incidents and hateful rhetoric. Our community draws strength from its diverse population, including many who self-identify as Jewish. The documented increase in antisemitism is troubling and we
14.1 believe our City Council should speak out against all forms of discrimination and hate, including antisemitism.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
Submitted By:
Sonja Brunner
Mayor
Submitted By:
Martine Watkins
Vice Mayor
Submitted By:
Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson
Councilmember
ATTACHMENTS:
1. RESOLUTION.DOCX
14.2 RESOLUTION NO. NS-29,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ
CONDEMNING ANTISEMITISM
WHEREAS, according to an Anti-Defamation League report, 2,024 antisemitic incidents were reported nationwide in 2020 – the third highest year on record – and 289 incidents occurred in California, a known undercount as most antisemitic incidents go unreported; and WHEREAS recent antisemitic incidents in California have included fliers at Santa Monica elementary schools linking Jewish people to the COVID-19 pandemic and the anti-vaccine movement (January 13, 2022), in Santa Rosa, vandalism of a Holocaust Memorial statue (January 7th, 2022), and in Los Angeles, two Jewish diners being assaulted outside a restaurant after the assailants asked who was Jewish (May 18, 2021); and
WHEREAS, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, more than 50 percent of religious-biased hate crimes in 2020 targeted Jewish Americans, who comprise less than two percent of the U.S. population; and
WHEREAS, nearly one in four Jewish Americans said they experienced antisemitism in the past year according to a study released on October 25, 2021, by the American Jewish Committee; and
WHEREAS, in the past month, the college campuses of UC Santa Cruz and Cabrillo College’s Watsonville campus, as well as local high school campuses, have all experienced hate crimes, including acts of antisemitic vandalism; and
WHEREAS, antisemitism, like racism, remains a serious danger for Jewish people, consisting of centuries-old bigotry and hate directed toward Jews simply because they are Jewish, often involving the use of stereotypes, tropes, and myths; and WHEREAS, the Santa Cruz community is home to a number of storied Jewish organizations and institutions; and
WHEREAS, the recent rise in antisemitic incidents and hateful rhetoric has left our Jewish neighbors feeling fearful and we must work together to create community centered solutions that stop the violence in all communities; and
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Cruz has a duty to speak out against all forms of discrimination and hate, and draws its strength from its diverse population, many of which selfidentify as Jewish; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Santa Cruz City Council calls on all residents and leaders to join in condemning antisemitism in all forms and renewing our commitment to speak out against such attacks, defend and protect those targeted, and seek justice and accountability against those who commit hate crimes against Jewish members of our community; and
14.3 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Santa Cruz City Council, on behalf of the people of the City of Santa Cruz, denounces hate crimes, hateful rhetoric, and hateful acts against Jewish people, and works to ensure that Jewish community members and visitors feel safe and welcome.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
APPROVED: ______________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
14.4 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: City Council
SUBJECT: Council Support of the Establishment of a New CalVet Veterans Home in Monterey County in Order to Provide Skilled Nursing and Memory Care Services for Aging, Disabled, and Homeless Veterans Living in the Central Coast Region of California (CN)
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to direct the Mayor to write a letter to the Monterey County Board of Supervisors and to California State Legislators in support of the establishment of a new CalVet Veterans Home in Monterey County.
BACKGROUND: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) promotes the care and treatment of veterans in State Veterans Homes as an important means to attain its goal of developing, providing, and maintaining the highest quality of care for eligible veterans.
In California, the closest CalVet Veterans Homes communities to Santa Cruz are in Fresno and Yountville (Napa) at 2.5 hours away, followed by Ventura at 4 hours away. A new Veterans Homes community hasn't been built in California in over 10 years and it's been 20 years since the last State legislation to build the last two in Fresno and Redding (SB 1234 by State Senator Johanessen in 2002).
California has the largest Veteran population in the U.S. of over 1.8 million - of which 21,000 reside in Monterey County, 10,000 in Santa Cruz County, 57,000 in Santa Clara County, 17,800 in San Luis Obispo County, and 2,500 in San Benito County.
DISCUSSION: Monterey County Board of Supervisors is requesting regional support to bring a new Veterans Home community to Monterey County. Veterans Homes provide skilled nursing and memory care services for aging, disabled and homeless veterans. It could possibly serve the 108,300 veterans in the regions of Monterey, Santa Cruz, San Luis Obispo, San Benito and Santa Clara Counties.
There are only eight other existing Veterans Homes throughout the state, and the waitlist is long for vacancies.
To date, letters of support have been submitted from the cities of Monterey, Watsonville, King City, Salinas, Greenfield, Carmel, and Pacific Grove, as well as from the counties of Santa Cruz, Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, San Luis Obispo, and San Mateo.
15.1 FISCAL IMPACT: None.
Submitted By:
Justin Cummings
Councilmember
Submitted By:
Sonja Brunner
Mayor
Submitted By:
Sandy Brown
Councilmember
ATTACHMENTS:
1. DRAFT LETTER TO MONTEREY COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.PDF
2. DRAFT LETTER TO STATE LEGISLATORS.PDF
15.2 15.3
15.4 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: Economic Development
SUBJECT: Loan Consolidation and Affordability Term Extension for Sycamore Street Commons and La Playa Residential – Affordable Housing (ED) RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve loan terms for the consolidation and extension of City of Santa Cruz loans for Sycamore Street Commons and La Playa Residential and authorize the City Manager to execute the loan documents in a form to be approved by the City Attorney for the purpose of rehabbing this affordable housing and extending the affordability period.
BACKGROUND: The Sycamore Street Commons apartment complex is located at 125 Sycamore Street and consists of 60 rental apartments for low-income households. La Playa Residential is located at 216 Leibrandt Avenue and consists of eight 1-bedroom apartments as well as commercial space. The properties were built in 1998 and 1994 respectively and are owned and operated by an affiliate of Mercy Housing California, a non-profit affordable housing provider founded in 1981 (“Mercy Housing”). The City of Santa Cruz has provided various loans for the construction and maintenance of the properties including funding from the City’s former Redevelopment Agency, Housing Reconstruction Fund, In-Lieu Fees, HOME Investment Partnerships Program, and Community Development Block Grant to name a few.
In 2018 the properties were awarded Low Income Housing Tax Credits and Tax-Exempt Bonds to fund more extensive renovation and modernization of the properties. At the time Mercy Housing and the City were working together to consolidate the City’s loans on the property.
However, the process was put on hold due to an unforeseen issue resulting in the rescission of the tax credit and bond awards. Since that time Mercy Housing has been awarded another allocation of tax credits and bonds and is expected to close on the construction financing for the projects in May 2022, hence the need to resume the consolidation of the City’s loans on the properties.
DISCUSSION: Sycamore Street Commons and La Playa Residential provide housing for households earning between 35% and 60% of Area Median Income. The consolidation of the City’s loans on the properties will streamline the affordability restrictions as well as provide continued long-term affordability for residents. In discussion with Mercy Housing, staff recommends that the loan consolidation include the following provisions:
• Reconveyance and consolidation of existing loans into one new loan and extending the term to 57 years from the construction closing date (estimated May 2022) to match the tax credit regulatory period;
16.1 • Reset the loan interest rate to AFR with interest compounding annually; • New consolidated City loan will be subordinate to senior lenders including US Bank and State HCD the same as it has always been in the existing loan structure; and • Release of any existing regulatory and/or participation agreements that have expired and release any remaining regulatory and/or participation agreements contingent on each funder’s regulations and replace with a new consolidated regulatory agreement for each property.
The renovation scope of work includes life safety and accessibility upgrades, repairs to building systems, installation of laundry facilities (La Playa), interior unit improvements, and energy efficiency upgrades. The improvements will extend the physical viability of the existing buildings to better support the everyday needs of residents and management as well as allow the properties to operate more efficiently.
FISCAL IMPACT: Mercy Housing will be responsible for all rehab improvement costs and there is no cost to the City and no additional City funding requested.
Prepared By:
Jessica de Wit
Housing and Community
Development Manager
Jessica Mellor
Management Analyst
Submitted By:
Bonnie Lipscomb
Director of Economic
Development
Approved By:
Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. RESOLUTION.DOCX
16.2 RESOLUTION NO. NSRESOLUTION FOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ APPROVING
LOAN TERMS FOR THE CONSOLIDATION AND EXTENSION OF CITY OF SANTA
CRUZ LOANS FOR SYCAMORE STREET COMMONS AND LA PLAYA RESIDENTIAL (PROJECT) AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE LOAN
DOCUMENTS AND ANY AMENDMENTS OR DOCUMENTS NEEDED THERETO OF A
NON-SUBSTANTIVE NATURE, IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY
FOR THE PROJECT
All or a necessary quorum and majority of the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz, a California Municipal Corporation, (“City”) hereby consents to, adopts and ratifies the following resolution:
WHEREAS, between 1988 and 1994, the City made a series of loans totaling approximately Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Forty-Three Dollars ($477,843) (the “La Playa Loans”) for the development of eight (8) affordable housing units called La Playa Residential, located at 216 Leibrandt Avenue in the City of Santa Cruz, California. The promissory notes for the La Playa Loans were each secured by deeds of trust recorded against the La Playa Residential Project.
WHEREAS, between 1994 and 1996, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Cruz, a public body, corporate and politic (the “Redevelopment Agency”), made a series of loans totaling approximately Eight Hundred Forty-Two Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars ($842,240) (the “Sycamore Street Loans”) for the development of sixty (60) affordable residential units called Sycamore Street Commons, located at 125 Sycamore Street in the City of Santa Cruz, California. The promissory notes for the Sycamore Street Loans were secured by deeds of trust recorded against the Sycamore Street Commons Project.
WHEREAS, in 1998, the City made a grant under the federal HOME Investment Partnership Program totaling approximately One Hundred Four Thousand Nine Hundred FiftyFour Dollars ($104,954) (the “City HOME Grant”) to maintain sixty (60) affordable rental residential units at Sycamore Street Commons as assisted units for low-income households. The City HOME Grant is secured by the HOME Investment Partnerships Program Regulatory Agreement and Grant of Interest in Real Property, dated June 5, 1998, and recorded on September 3, 1998 as Instrument No. 19998-0052126 in the Official Records of Santa Cruz County, California. Said regulatory agreement expired on September 3, 2018.
WHEREAS, the City’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund is authorized to act as the trustee/manager in connection with the above-described Project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz as follows:
SECTION 1. That the City’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund is hereby authorized to act as the
16.3 RESOLUTION NO. NS2
trustee/manager in connection with the Project pursuant to the above-described City Council approval.
SECTION 2. The City, acting with the City’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund, shall reconvey and consolidate all of the existing City loans for this Project into one new loan with the Borrower Mercy Housing California 72, L.P. or another entity to be established by Mercy Housing California and extend the term to 57 years from the construction closing date to match the tax credit regulatory period; reset the loan interest rate to AFR with interest compounding annually; subordinate to senior lenders including US Bank and State HCD the same as it has always been in the existing loan structure; and release of any existing regulatory and/or participation agreements that have expired and release any remaining regulatory and/or participation agreements contingent on each funder’s regulations and replace with a new consolidated regulatory agreement for each property.
SECTION 3. City Manager or Economic Development Director are authorized to execute the Project’s loan documents, any subsequent amendments or modifications thereto, as well as any other related documents.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
APPROVED: ______________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
16.4 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Garrett <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2022 8:30 PM
To: City Council
Subject: 4.12.22 Agenda Item # 16 Loan Consolidation
4.12.22 Agenda Item # 16 Loan Consolidation
Dear Council,
No where in this do you actually explain terms of the loan consolidation.
Do you really think that meets transparency considerations? Did you really explain the need to consolidate the previous loans? (no) Whatsamatter, the old loans didn't work out? 57 years also seems like a long time. You think the investment will sill be viable until then? This reeks of the government flushing money, but that's just my impression (I hope I'm wrong).
Garrett Philipp - Westsdise
16.5 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: Economic Development
SUBJECT: Expiration of Statewide Evictions Moratorium – Authorization to Enter into an Agreement with the Community Action Board for $150,000 for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance through December 31, 2022 (ED) RECOMMENDATION: Resolution appropriating $150,000 from the CA state funding for homelessness response and authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Community Action Board, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to provide tenant-based rental assistance through December 31, 2022.
BACKGROUND: At the regular meeting of March 8, 2022, the City Council requested a report concerning the status of statewide eviction protections and potential local actions to assist tenants continuing to experience financial distress due to the impacts of COVID-19. At the following regular meeting of March 22, 2022, staff provided a presentation to the Council on the expiration of the statewide eviction protections and current efforts underway to provide tenant based resources and support to community members in Santa Cruz needing rental assistance. Following the staff presentation and discussion, the City Council directed the City Manager to engage in a regional eviction protection effort with the County and other jurisdictions regarding preventing period from being evicted and to bring back a recommendation to Council for consideration for a monetary contribution to these efforts.
DISCUSSION: Over the last several weeks, staff from the City Manager’s Office have been meeting with staff from the County, as well as the cities of Capitola and Watsonville, to develop a coordinated plan for addressing the local rental assistance and needs. Based on these regional conversations, the County has committed $500,000 to contract with Community Bridges to provide the following case management and rental assistance services: 1) Follow-up with state and local applicants with pending Housing Is Key applications; 2) Provide support to households to sustain housing after back-rent/utilities are paid; and 3) Work with households and the courts to minimize the number of formal evictions and to maintain stable housing.
In addition to the County’s efforts, the cities of Santa Cruz, Capitola and Watsonville have all agreed to commit funding towards a centralized local rental payment assistance program administered by the Community Action Board (CAB). Throughout the course of the pandemic, Santa Cruz supplemented its existing contract for tenant based rental assistance with supplemental federal funding received during the pandemic through the City’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME programs. The City provided CAB with $200,000 of HOME funds and $30,000 of CDBG-CV funding which assisted approximately 75
17.1 households. The supplemental funding and contract was completed in June of 2021 and coincided with the beginning of the Housing is Key statewide program which allocated $16M of funding for the County of Santa Cruz.
Staff is recommending the City enter into a new agreement with CAB, similar to Emergency Eviction Prevention Program (EEPP) funded at the beginning of the pandemic with an additional appropriation of $150,000 as the statewide program will no longer be taking applications after March 31, 2022. Expansion and continuation of this program will provide much needed flexible financial assistance for those households that were unable or ineligible to access the state’s Housing is Key funding.
The City Manager’s Office will continue regular communication with the County to coordinate the broader tenant assistance resources. Additionally, as referenced previously, there are multiple resources available to tenants in the City of Santa Cruz including assistance understanding local, State and Federal housing laws, financial assistance and information resources. Tenants interested in State laws pertaining to landlords and tenants may find the State of California Landlord/Tenants Handbook (https://landlordtenant.dre.ca.gov/resources/guidebook/index.html) helpful in understanding fundamental aspects of rental housing laws in California. When facing issues or questions related to rental tenancy, tenants may find Tenant Sanctuary (https://tenantsanctuary.org/) and California Rural Legal Assistance (CRLA) ( https://crla.org/) helpful resources. Lastly, tenants who need assistance with Security Deposits (https://hacosantacruz.org/security-deposit-program/) can contact the Housing Authority of Santa Cruz County (https://hacosantacruz.org/.)
• Tenant Sanctuary works to empower tenants by educating them on their rights and providing the tools to pursue those rights. For more information contact Tenant Sanctuary directly:
https://tenantsanctuary.org/ ; (831) 200-0740, [email protected] • California Rural Legal Assistance, Inc. (CRLA) is a nonprofit law firm founded in 1966 to provide free civil legal services to low-income residents of California's rural counties. For information on legal assistance please contact them directly: https://crla.org/ ; 831-724-2253 from 8:30 am -12 pm and 1-5pm.
• The State of California Landlord/Tenants Handbook is designed to educate landlords and tenants on the fundamental aspects of rental housing laws in California. This booklet is not a legal authority, and individuals should contact legal counsel to ensure conformance to the law:
https://landlordtenant.dre.ca.gov/resources/guidebook/index.html • Community Action Board (CAB) Emergency Housing Assistance Program:
https://cabinc.org/2020/07/14/city-of-santa-cruz-emergency-eviction-prevention-program/; waitlist is currently closed, for questions on previously submitted application please call CAB 831.457.1741
• The Security Deposit Program is administered by the Housing Authority of Santa Cruz County.
Low income tenants are eligible for assistance with required rental deposits. The security deposit program assists tenants with the deposit required at initial occupancy. For assistance with this program please contact the Housing Authority of Santa Cruz County.
Specifically, the City of Santa Cruz provides funding directly to the following organizations for the programs outlined below.
Housing Authority - The Housing Authority administers several Security Deposit Programs for jurisdictions in Santa Cruz County. These Security Deposit Programs offer eligible individuals
17.2 and families assistance with a security deposit paid directly to the landlord. The Security Deposit Program has been allocated over $200,000 from the City of Santa Cruz in relocation funds during the 2021 program year which is slated to last through June 30, 2023. Staff confirmed that over $140,000 of available funding remains for Santa Cruz residents in the City program while there is no funding for programs elsewhere in the County of Santa Cruz.
Community Action Board (CAB) – The Housing Division of the Economic Development Department partnered with CAB to administer the Emergency Eviction Prevention Program (EEPP) which was funded with $230,000 in HOME and CDBG-CV funds, as referenced above.
These funds helped approximately 75 households including families and individuals with up to 2 months of rent assistance. These funds were used to assist with payment of past due rent, incurred after April 1, 2020. The waitlist for this program is currently closed and all funds were utilized prior to June 30, 2021. CAB is additionally funded with $11,000 of Red Cross funds for eviction services in the Beach Flats area.
California Rural Legal Assistance (CRLA) - The City maintains a formal contract with CRLA to help low income residents with fair housing complaints. As the primary fair housing assistance provider in the Santa Cruz area, CRLA provides a variety of consultation services through its hotline service and consultations. During the 2020 and 2021 program years, CRLA received $45,000 and $50,000 in combined CDBG and CORE funding for each respective year.
Tenant Sanctuary - The City has provided funding to Tenant Sanctuary for the last 2.5 fiscal years, with $30,000 in each of the last two fiscal years (including FY 2022) to provide tenants’ rights education services.
Additionally, the County is considering approximately $500,000 to support extension of current emergency rental assistance and eviction protection including mediation and legal representation.
The staff recommendation to fund the EEPP with additional funding of $150,000 would allow the program to re-open, coinciding with the end of Housing is Key. Funding at this level would allow the program to re-open through December 31, 2022. The program funding would cover $112,000 in direct financial assistance to landlords on behalf of eligible clients and the remaining funding would cover staff/personnel time for outreach, intake, assistance with applications, translation services and case management and other indirect costs. As part of a pending CORE application, if awarded, CAB will be administering an additional $25,000 of direct rental assistance for City residents which will renew annually.
In addition to the recommendation above, CAB has indicated that if additional funding were available it could scale the program at a future date from the base ask of $150,000 and extend the program through June 30, 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT: $150,000 of the $14M awarded to the City from the state funding for homelessness response would be utilized to re-open the tenant based rental assistance program through December 31, 2022.
Staff is continuing to coordinate efforts with the County to secure additional funding to provide rent assistance to tenants, help landlords avoid foreclosure, and provide additional resources for tenant counseling and legal representation. Periodic reports to the Council regarding those efforts will be forthcoming.
17.3 Prepared By:
Tiffany Lake
Principal Management
Analyst
Submitted By:
Bonnie Lipscomb
Director of Economic
Development
Approved By:
Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. BUDGET ADJUSTMENT.PDF
17.4 City of Santa Cruz
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
3XUSRVH
ACCOUNT REVENUE EDEN ACCOUNT TITLE
TOTALREVENUE
ACCOUNT EXPENDITURE EDENACCOUNT TITLE
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
NET: $
REQUESTED BY
DEPARTMENT HEAD
APPROVAL
BUDGET/ACCOUNTING
5(9,(:('
FINANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVAL
CITYMANAGER
APPROVAL
&0)18VH2QO\
5HVR
%$5HI
352-(&7
352-(&7
$02817
$02817
)LVFDO<HDU
'DWH
&RXQFLO$SSURYDO
$GPLQLVWUDWLYH$SSURYDO
Clear Form
2022
04/04/2022
Appropriate $150,000 to implement the Emergency Eviction Prevention Program and re-open the tenant based rental assistance program through December 31, 2022. 101-00-00-0000-49178 p102212-912-0-0 Transfer In 150,000 150,000
101-10-03-1116-52199 p102212-100-2020-0 Other Professional and Technical 150,000 293-00-00-0000-59101 Transfer Out 150,000
300,000
-150,000
Lupita
Alamos
Digitally signed by Lupita Alamos
DN: cn=Lupita Alamos, o=City of
Santa Cruz, ou=Finance,
[email protected]
om, c=US
Date: 2022.04.04 13:05:15 -07'00'
Bonnie
Lipscomb
Digitally signed by Bonnie Lipscomb
DN: cn=Bonnie Lipscomb, o=City of
Santa Cruz, ou=Economic
Development,
[email protected]
om, c=US
Date: 2022.04.05 09:46:55 -07'00'
Nicholas
Gong
Digitally signed by Nicholas Gong
DN: cn=Nicholas Gong, o=City of
Santa Cruz, ou=Finance,
[email protected],
c=US
Date: 2022.04.04 14:42:12 -07'00'
Bobby
Magee
Digitally signed by Bobby Magee
DN: cn=Bobby Magee, o=City of
Santa Cruz, ou=Finance,
[email protected]
m, c=US
Date: 2022.04.04 14:45:11 -07'00'
17.5 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Garrett <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2022 8:09 PM
To: City Council
Subject: 4.12.22 Agenda Item #17 Free money for tenants
4.12.22 Agenda Item #17 Free money for tenants
Dear Council,
The state, which is a most too progressive and free spending of the public monies state, had determined the eviction moratorium needs to end as the Covid emergency is over as far as that is concerned.
YOU, don't really care about whether any such emergency exists anyway, if it still existed which is doesn't; you just don't like the idea of people who don't live up to their obligations having to get real and make adjustments to live honorably in a just society. Homeless money is for HOMELESS people, wait until they are homeless, maybe they will fix their situation before that happens.
YOU, don't say how this money exactly will be spent. ARE YOU GIVING IT AWAY??? Say, how about giving me some? In an environment where YOU are asking the people to increase taxes on themselves to the maximum allowable in the nation, not temporarily, but permanently even though the stated emergencies will not last that long tell me that YOU are not people of principal.
A bigger and bigger government we do not need or want or think will be a good thingy. More and more government dependent people are not what we need.
Maybe they should WORK for this money at least so that the people may benefit from the peoples money.
Garrett Philipp - Westside
17.6 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/04/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: Finance
SUBJECT: Amend Lease with 1200 Pacific, LLC. to Include Conference Space at 1200 Pacific Avenue for use by the City’s Finance Department and Appropriate $442,827 for Conference Space, Space Improvements and Infrastructure, Lease Deposit, Office Furniture Move, Rental, and Purchase (FN)
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Adopt a resolution amending the FY 2022 budget to increase appropriation in the amount of $442,827 for conference space, space improvements and infrastructure, deposit rental, office furniture move, rental, and purchase.
2) Authorize and direct the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Lease Agreement with 1200 Pacific, LLC., and any amendments thereto, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for premises located at 1200 Pacific Avenue to serve as office space for the Finance Department.
BACKGROUND: In 2014, as part of a general evaluation and reorganization of City space, the Finance Department (Department) moved from City Hall into space rented from Ecology Action at 877 Cedar Street. It was anticipated that the move would be interim until a remodeling process at City Hall allowed the Department to move back. However, given additional space needs for City staff, it was not feasible for the Department to do so, and the occupancy of the Cedar Street premises continued.
In November 2019 Ecology Action provided the Department a Notice to Vacate by March 1, 2020. A search of available space in the vicinity of downtown Santa Cruz was conducted and it was determined that the Department would temporarily move into the City-owned building at 333 Front Street (the “NIAC” building), which had been purchased with housing funds in 2017.
The property is planned for affordable housing as part of the redevelopment of the METRO Pacific Station site, and Economic Development oversees the property as part of its opportunity site portfolio. The Pacific Station South Project is expected to break ground in early 2023.
Extensive construction next to the NIAC building is already underway, and the NIAC building is current scheduled to be demolished sometime in late 2022 or early 2023 to make way for the new development. As such, the Department will again be required to relocate.
On January 11, 2022 the Council authorized the City Manager to execute a lease agreement with Redtree Partners for premises located at 1200 Pacific Avenue to serve as office space for the
18.1 Department (Consent Agenda Item #11). Subsequently, it was discovered that the lease will actually be signed by 1200 Pacific, LLC instead of Redtree Partners, however all other terms and conditions will remain exactly the same. The lease term is for seven years, with an option held by the City to extend an additional two years at the City’s sole discretion.
DISCUSSION: Upon receiving approval from the Council to lease the space at 1200 Pacific Avenue, the Department began working with space planners to properly configure offices and cubicles for existing staff. As this work progressed it became apparent that in order to achieve full Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance, additional space would be needed to fit all existing staff into the current space and further provide for a departmental conference room.
The building has an available conference room immediately next to the suite that the Department will be occupying. The existing lease includes 5,131 square feet at a monthly cost of $7,953 per month, for an annual cost of $95,437. The 198 square foot conference room carries an additional annual cost of $6,600.
As disclosed in the January staff report, in addition to rent, NNN (triple net lease) expenses (shared building costs) of $0.66 per square foot, excluding the additional conference room, per month will be paid. Costs for the space will still be less than the NNN’s for the currently leased larger NIAC building. Furthermore, a security deposit as written into the lease in the amount of $9,496.36, will need to be appropriated in FY 2022.
The space requires minimal buildout, which will be partially covered by the owner, however additional changes were needed to comply with ADA ingress and egress around the planned cubicle space for which the Department will need to cover. Those additional charges will amount to $6,730, and will need to be appropriated in FY 2022. Estimates for wireless setup, fiber connectivity and network installation will cost $30,000 and estimates for electrical needs are $30,000. Both will need to be appropriated in FY 2022.
Most of the furniture and fixtures at the current NIAC building are anchored to the building and cannot be removed and repurposed. As such, the department will need to purchase new office furniture to accommodate the staff at the new location. As a preliminary review with Palace Business Solutions, with whom the City has a cooperative contract with, new furniture and installation will cost approximately $300,000. Because of supply chain concerns identified by the contractor, the Department is recommending to rent office furniture so that staff may be able to function in the new space as soon as possible. An estimate with CORT Workplace to deliver, install and remove rented office furniture for 3 months use will be $20,000, which will need to be appropriated in FY 2022.
Lastly, the Department needs to budget for moving expenses. Current estimates are $20,000 to complete the move and $20,000 for moving contingencies. This will include moving filing cabinets to the new location and documents to storage in accordance with the City’s retention policy, and other items associated with the move.
FISCAL IMPACT: The request to appropriate funds in FY22 as discussed above, and outlined below, total $442,827:
Additional lease space $6,600
Lease deposit $9,497
Space buildout $6,730
18.2 Cabling $30,000
Electrical $30,000
Purchase/installation office furniture $300,000
Rental interim office furniture $20,000
Moving services $20,000
Contingency $20,000
Grand Total $-442,827
Prepared By:
Marisol Gómez
Assistant Finance Director
Submitted By:
Bobby Magee
Interim Finance Director
Approved By:
Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. BUDGET ADJUSTMENT.PDF
18.3 City of Santa Cruz
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
3XUSRVH
ACCOUNT REVENUE EDEN ACCOUNT TITLE
TOTALREVENUE
ACCOUNT EXPENDITURE EDENACCOUNT TITLE
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
NET: $
REQUESTED BY
DEPARTMENT HEAD
APPROVAL
BUDGET/ACCOUNTING
5(9,(:('
FINANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVAL
CITYMANAGER
APPROVAL
&0)18VH2QO\
5HVR
%$5HI
352-(&7
352-(&7
$02817
$02817
)LVFDO<HDU
'DWH
&RXQFLO$SSURYDO
$GPLQLVWUDWLYH$SSURYDO
Clear Form
2022
03/21/2022
Increase appropriation for the new building lease and additional expenditures associated with the relocation of the Finance Department.
0 101-14-11-1241-52261 Equipment, building and land rentals 442,827 442,827
-442,827
Marisol
Gomez
Digitally signed by Marisol Gomez
DN: cn=Marisol Gomez, o=City of
Santa Cruz, ou=Finance
Department,
email=mgomez@cityofsantacruz.
com, c=US
Date: 2022.03.31 09:04:26 -07'00'
Bobby
Magee
Digitally signed by Bobby Magee
DN: cn=Bobby Magee, o=City of Santa Cruz,
ou=Finance, [email protected],
c=US
Date: 2022.03.31 09:07:33 -07'00'
Tracy
Cole
Digitally signed by Tracy Cole
DN: cn=Tracy Cole, o=City of Santa
Cruz, ou=Finance Department,
[email protected],
c=US
Date: 2022.03.31 09:15:25 -07'00'
Bobby
Magee
Digitally signed by Bobby Magee
DN: cn=Bobby Magee, o=City of
Santa Cruz, ou=Finance,
[email protected]
m, c=US
Date: 2022.03.31 09:07:47 -07'00'
18.4 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: UV Bypass Valve Repair (m409659) – Notice of Completion (PW) RECOMMENDATION: Motion to accept the work of Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction Inc., (Santa Clara, CA) and to authorize the filing of the Notice of Completion for the UV Bypass Valve Repair Project (m409659).
BACKGROUND: At its June 23, 2020 meeting, City Council approved the authorization to execute a change order of a sole source purchase and authorized the City Manager to execute the change order. The original contract was awarded to Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction based on ability and availability for the amount of $97,000 in January of 2020. Construction began in June 2020. After significant work was performed, it was determined that a 21,000 volt electrical duct bank was in conflict and an additional $100,000 was required to complete the work.
DISCUSSION: The work for this project is now complete. The project has been inspected by staff and found to be constructed in accordance with the direction of the on-site engineers.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total project cost was $197,000. This project was funded by the Wastewater Fund Capital Investment Project (CIP) Wastewater Collections Division Storage Shed (m409659). The County Sanitation District pays 8/17ths of the cost based on wastewater treatment facility capacity dedicated to the County. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Prepared By:
Ryan Haley
Assistant Engineer II
Submitted By:
Mark R. Dettle
Director of Public Works
Approved By:
Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. NOTICE OF COMPLETION.DOCX
19.1 UV Bypass Valve Notice of Completion
(Space above for Recorder’s use only)
This instrument is being recorded for the benefit of the City of Santa Cruz.
No recording fee is required pursuant to Government Code § 27383.
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(CA Civil Code Sections 8102 and 9204)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
The undersigned is an authorized representative of the owner of the interest or estate stated below.
1. The Owner’s Name and Address. The Project owner is the City of Santa Cruz, a municipal corporation (the “City”). The City’s mailing address is 809 Center Street, Santa Cruz, California 95060. The City of Santa Cruz has the following interest in the subject Property described below: City Property
2. Project Title and Number. The full name of the work of improvement/public works project (the “Project”) which is the subject of this Notice of Completion is: UV Bypass Valve Repair (m409659)
3. Nature of Work Performed on the Property or Materials Furnished for the City. The Project consisted of work described as: Repair broken actuator and valve for the UV bypass system at the Wastewater Treatment Facility
4. The general site location description or address (the “Property”) of the public improvement is located at: 110 California Street.
5. Name and Address of Contractor. The Contractor on the Project is: Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction Inc. 1390 Norman Ave, Santa Clara, CA 95054
6. Date of Completion. The Project on the Property was completed on: July 15, 2020
7. The filing of this Notice of Completion was authorized by the Santa Cruz City Council Minute Order on Tuesday, April 12, 2022
DATE: ___________________
Mark Dettle
Director of Public Works, City of Santa Cruz
RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF:
City of Santa Cruz, Public Works
Attn: Ryan Haley
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City Clerk’s Department
809 Center Street, Room 9
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
19.2 UV Bypass Valve Notice of Completion
VERIFICATION FOR THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ
I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof, and I certify that the same is true of my own knowledge, except as to those matters which are therein stated upon my information or belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on ____________________at Santa Cruz, CA
Ryan Haley
Assistant Engineer II, City of Santa Cruz
19.3 Notice of Completion (Revised Oct 2021)
PROOF OF SERVICE DECLARATION
(California Civil Code § 8118)
I, Ryan Haley, declare that I served copies of the above NOTICE OF COMPLETION on the interested parties, in the manner and at the date and place set forth below (Check One):
Direct Contractor: Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction 1390 Norman Ave
Santa Clara, CA95054
☐ REGISTERED, CERTIFIED, OR EXPRESS MAIL: by placing the Notice in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid and depositing the envelope in the United States mail by registered, certified, or express mail. Documentation of such service is attached herein. ☐ OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: by causing the Notice to be picked up for overnight delivery by an express service carrier. Documentation of such service is attached herein. ☐ PERSONAL DELIVERY: by causing the Notice to be personally delivered to each of the addresses above stated on the date below.
☐ CODE OF CIV. PROC. § 415.20: by leaving the Notice and mailing a copy of the Notice in the manner provided under California Code of Civil Procedure § 415.20 for service of a summons and complaint in a civil action.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on April 12, 2022 at Santa Cruz, California.
Ryan Haley
19.4 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: High Voltage Portable Battery Charger for First All Electric Refuse Truck (g402205) – Budget Adjustment (PW)
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Adopt a resolution amending the FY 2022 budget and appropriate funds in the amount of $179,552.38 to fully fund the high voltage portable battery; and 2) Adopt a resolution to authorize the City Manager to apply, accept, and appropriate funding from California Energy Commission’s grant programs that the City is eligible for a five-year term; and
3) Authorize the City Manager to apply, accept, and appropriate grant funds from California Energy Commission (CEC) Energy Infrastructure Incentives for Zero-Emission Commercial Vehicles (EnergIIZE Commercial Vehicles) and authorize FreeWire Technologies to apply for funds on the behalf of the City for the Ultrafast EV Charger with Integrated Storage (g402205).
BACKGROUND: In 2020, the City of Santa Cruz (City) applied for and was awarded grant funding to purchase an all-electric refuse hauler. Those solicitations consisted of $400,000 from Monterey Bay Air Resource District (MBARD) and $200,000 from the VW Mitigation Fund, which cover the entire cost of the vehicle purchase after grant reimbursements are received.
The new EV refuse truck is set to arrive during the spring of 2022. At this time there is no compatible charger for the vehicle. In anticipation of its arrival, the Sanitation Division identified a charger that works on the current electrical system and has a battery backup, making it portable. The location of the EV refuse hauler, the Corporation Yard (Corp Yard), is undergoing major electrical upgrades to bring in the necessary infrastructure to charge medium/heavy duty EVs but those upgrades will be not be completed until 2023. As of now, the Corp Yard uses a 208V transformer but the chargers that work with larger vehicles require a 480V transformer.
The FreeWire charger works on 208V and provides the proper voltage (unlike the existing chargers) to the new EV refuse hauler.
The CEC EnergIIZE program, administered by CALSTART, was created to speed up the deployment and installations of medium duty/heavy duty zero-emission vehicle (MD/HD ZEV) infrastructure in order to provide more accessible and reliable electric charging and hydrogen refueling options, which are critical for accommodating future MD/HD ZEV fleets. EnergIIZE
20.1 Commercial Vehicles will help achieve the ambitious goals set by the State of California’s Executive Order N-79-20, signed in September 2020, which requires 100% of MD/HD vehicles in the state to be zero-emission by 2045, where feasible.
EnergIIZE Commercial Vehicles will address gaps and reduce barriers to the deployment of MD/HD ZEV infrastructure throughout the state, speed up the deployment and installations of necessary electric vehicle charging and hydrogen refueling stations for fleet use, and will enable targeted infrastructure incentive deployment to disadvantaged communities.
DISCUSSION: The EnergIIZE program will cover half the cost but the remainder will need to be made up through the Sanitation Division and a portion from the Energy Division. This is the only charger that will work with the current electrical system at the Corp Yard. The charger also has significant battery backup and is portable, which will allow the City to bring it anywhere necessary for charging an electric vehicle. Another benefit of this charger is the Corp Yard’s solar system overproduces electricity and this charger/battery system can store that energy to be used to fuel electric vehicles.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Refuse Fund will need to appropriate $179,552.38 to cover the purchase of the battery (g402205). The General Fund Energy Efficiency Projects Division will contribute $10,000 toward the purchase. The EnergIIZE program provides grant opportunities and, if awarded, would reimburse the City half of the amount of the portable battery charger, which will go back into the Refuse Fund. The impact to the General Fund is minimal and will be an investment to the City’s transition to a more electric fleet.
Prepared By:
Christina Alberti
Management Analyst
Andy Shatney
Energy Projects Coordinator
Submitted By:
Mark R. Dettle
Director of Public Works
Approved By:
Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. RESOLUTION.DOCX
2. BUDGET ADJUSTMENT.PDF
3. FREEWIRE QUOTE.PDF
20.2 RESOLUTION NO. NSRESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ AUTHORING
SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION(S) FOR ALL CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
GRANTS FOR WHICH CITY OF SANTA CRUZ IS ELIGIBLE
WHEREAS, the California Energy Commission (CEC) plays a critical role in an energy system that thrives. The CEC also plays a key role in developing and implementing policies and programs that create a low-carbon economy; and
WHEREAS, the California Energy Commission announced approval of a first-of-its-kind project to accelerate the deployment of infrastructure needed to fuel zero-emission trucks, buses and equipment, under the Clean Transportation Program; and WHEREAS, administered by CALSTART, the EnergIIZE Commercial Vehicles (Energy Infrastructure Incentives for Zero-Emission Commercial Vehicles) project will use a conciergelike model working directly with eligible applicants to help plan and fund the purchase of charging and hydrogen fueling infrastructure.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz authorizes the submittal of application(s) to the California Energy Commission for all grants which the City if Santa Cruz is eligible; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or his/her designee, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Santa Cruz all grant documents, including but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these authorizations are effective for five (5) years from the date of adoption of this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
APPROVED: ______________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
20.3 City of Santa Cruz
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
3XUSRVH
ACCOUNT REVENUE EDEN ACCOUNT TITLE
TOTALREVENUE
ACCOUNT EXPENDITURE EDENACCOUNT TITLE
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
NET: $
REQUESTED BY
DEPARTMENT HEAD
APPROVAL
BUDGET/ACCOUNTING
5(9,(:('
FINANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVAL
CITYMANAGER
APPROVAL
&0)18VH2QO\
5HVR
%$5HI
352-(&7
352-(&7
$02817
$02817
)LVFDO<HDU
'DWH
&RXQFLO$SSURYDO
$GPLQLVWUDWLYH$SSURYDO
Clear Form
2022
03/22/2022
A portable battery is necessary in order to charge the City's first heavy duty ZEV, a refuse truck, which will be delivered estimated in May 2022. The Corp Yard will be upgrading the infrastructure in order to charge all medium and heavy duty ZEVs but the work will not be d i ti b f i i th f hi l 3CE ill i b h lf f th b tt i
731-40-63-7302-43210 g402205-205-2100-0156 State operating grants and contributions 89,776 Freewire Boost Charger for Citywide EVs
731-00-00-0000-49101 g402205-912-0-0 Transfer from General Fund 10,000 Freewire Boost Charger for Citywide EVs
99,776
731-40-63-7302-57402 g402205-100-2020-0 Vehicle Equipment 179,552 Freewire Boost Charger for Citywide EVs
101-40-66-4111-54315 Maintenance - building remodeling -10,000 101-00-00-0000-59111 Transfer to Refuse Fund 10,000
179,552
-79,776
Christin
a Alberti
Digitally signed by Christina Alberti
DN: cn=Christina Alberti, o=City of Santa
Cruz, ou=Public Works,
[email protected],
c=US
Date: 2022.03.22 12:17:32 -07'00'
Mark
Dettle
Digitally signed
by Mark Dettle
Date: 2022.03.29
16:49:38 -07'00'
Nicholas
Gong
Digitally signed by Nicholas Gong
DN: cn=Nicholas Gong, o=City of
Santa Cruz, ou=Finance,
[email protected],
c=US
Date: 2022.04.04 08:30:14 -07'00'
Bobby
Magee
Digitally signed by Bobby Magee
DN: cn=Bobby Magee, o=City of
Santa Cruz, ou=Finance,
[email protected]
m, c=US
Date: 2022.04.04 08:46:31 -07'00'
20.4 City of Santa Cruz - TEC Electric Refuse Truck
Pilot
Reference: 20220307-114823789
Quote created: March 7, 2022
Quote expires: April 6, 2022
Quote created by: Jordan Baroody
Sales Director, State & Local Gov't
[email protected]
Products & Services
Item & Description Quantity Unit Price Total
Boost Max 150kW/1000V
Ultrafast EV Charger with Integrated Storage
160kWh capacity, 150kW 1000V Output
Dual-Port CHAdeMO and CCS Combo
1 $135,000.00 $135,000.00
3-Year On-Site Warranty, Maintenance,
and Connectivity
Limited Warranty for 3 Years
- Battery will be replaced within 3 years or 2,000
cycles if Energy Retention falls below 70%
- Includes Parts and Workmanship
Annual Preventative Maintenance and Over-theAir Software Updates Proactive Monitoring, Performance Data Analysis
& Reporting
1 $27,350.00 $27,350.00
Subtotals
One-time subtotal $162,350.00
Other Fees
shipping $2,000.00
9.25% Santa Cruz Sales Tax $15,202.38
City of Santa Cruz
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
United States
Andy Shatney
Energy Project Coordinator
[email protected]
(831) 251-5665 (Mobile)
20.5 Total $179,552.38
Purchase Terms
Terms Per FreeWire MSA
Questions? Contact me
Jordan Baroody
Sales Director, State & Local Gov't
[email protected]
FreeWire Technologies
7200 Gateway Blvd
Newark, CA 94560
US
20.6 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: 3 Water Cogeneration Cooling Line Replacement (c401407) – Authorization to Advertise and Award (PW)
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the plans and specifications for 3 Water Cogeneration Cooling Line Replacement (c401407), authorize staff to advertise for bids, and award the contract. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Director of Public Works is authorized to execute changes orders within the approved project budget.
BACKGROUND: The City of Santa Cruz Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) utilizes its own secondary effluent water (3 Water) to provide various on-site maintenance functions. One crucial function of 3 Water is generator cooling at the Cogeneration Building, a facility that processes sludge gas to produce power.
The Cogeneration Building is an integral part of the WWTF as it generates a significant portion of the WWTF’s power, contributing to the goal of efficient energy at Santa Cruz’s awardwinning treatment plant. The current ductile iron piping supplying 3 Water to the Cogeneration Building was constructed in 1988 and has experienced significant calcification and deterioration since. The current configuration of piping also lacks any convenient access points for pipe maintenance. Public Works staff propose to replace and improve a critical section of the existing piping system which connects directly to the Cogeneration Building.
DISCUSSION: The 3 Water Cogeneration Cooling Line Rehabilitation project will, at the critical section, replace the existing 4” 3 Water ductile iron pipe with a modern and more robust 6” C900 pipe. The project will include new valves and cleanouts to allow for efficient maintenance moving forward.
Plans and specifications can be found online at:
https://www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-departments/public-works/engineering/publicworks-projects.
FISCAL IMPACT: The project is estimated to be $250,000. The project is funded in the FY 2022 Capital Investment Program as WWTF Water Piping Rehab (c401709). There is no impact to the General Fund.
21.1 Prepared By:
Tim Wong
Assistant Engineer I
Submitted By:
Mark R. Dettle
Director of Public Works
Approved By:
Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
21.2 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: T2 Systems Parking Pay Stations - Award Contract (PW) RECOMMENDATION: Motion to award a contract for the purchase of 10 Luke II Parking Pay Stations from T2 Systems (Burnaby, BC) in the amount not to exceed $148,009.04.
BACKGROUND: The City of Santa Cruz (City) currently has 17 T2 Systems Parking Pay Stations in our off street surface lots. Ten of those units were installed in 2010 and have reached end of life as of March 31, 2021. T2 Systems is no longer able to support the hardware and software of these older versions and as such, are not PCI compliant, plus the recent lack of replacement parts has taken a couple of the units completely out of service.
DISCUSSION: Section 3.08.150 of the Purchasing Ordinance allows the Purchasing Manager to award a contract without competition when there is only one source for the required item/service. The Purchasing Manager concurs that T2 Systems is the only company able to provide comparable parking management systems equipment.
The ten outdated T2 Parking Pay Stations need to be replaced with newer versions of T2 Systems Parking Pay Stations. Utilizing our current vendor allows for equipment and maintenance consistency and continuity in customer service. An RFP process would not provide this need since these particular pay stations can only be purchased and supported through T2 Systems.
They are able to provide a five year lease to own program, which would begin in the current FY 2022 and installation could be implemented six to eight weeks from approval date.
T2 Systems has had a long successful relationship with the City’s Parking Services division, providing reliable service in the field for over 12 years. They are integrated with our Parkmobile parking app and our Parkcard payment systems. Most parking equipment vendors are not able to provide these integrations due to proprietary conflicts, however, T2 Systems has continued working relationships with our Parkmobile and Parkcard vendors, providing many options in one pay station for our customer base.
FISCAL IMPACT: The five year cost of this lease to own program is $148,009.04, with equipment lease 60 payments totaling $130,473.60 plus one time installation, software costs of $17,535.44. The FY 2022 costs can be absorbed by the existing FY 2022 Parking District Enterprise budget. The remaining annual costs shall also be paid by the Parking District Enterprise budget, with an option to purchase in full early. Staff will review at each budget cycle
22.1 if purchase option will be exercised for additional costs savings. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Prepared By:
Heather Sawyer
Superintendent of Parking
Services
Submitted By:
Mark R. Dettle
Director of Public Works
Approved By:
Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. LEASE PAYMENT SCHDULE.PDF
22.2 22.3
22.4 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: Economic Development
SUBJECT: Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act Hearing for Approval of the California Municipal Finance Authority for Issuance of Tax-Exempt Bonds for the Benefit of the Sycamore Street Commons and La Playa Residential Affordable Housing Projects (ED)
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Conduct the public hearing under the requirements of Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). 2) Resolution approving the issuance of Tax-Exempt Revenue Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority (“CMFA”) for the benefit of Mercy Housing California 72, L.P., a California limited partnership, or another entity to be established by Mercy Housing California or an affiliate thereof (collectively, the “Borrower”), in an amount not to exceed $28 million dollars to provide financing for Sycamore Street Commons and La Playa Residential (the “Project”), such adoption is solely for the purposes of satisfying the requirements of TEFRA, the Code and the California Government Code Section 6500.
BACKGROUND: Mercy Housing California 72, L.P. (the “Borrower”) is proposing to acquire, rehabilitate, improve and equip the Sycamore Street Commons property located at 125 Sycamore Street (the “Sycamore Project”) and the La Playa property located at 216 Leibrandt Avenue (the “La Playa Project”, and together with the Sycamore Project, the “Project”), both in the City of Santa Cruz using tax-exempt bonds as financing. The Sycamore Project includes 60 rental housing units providing housing to large-family households and the La Playa Project includes 8 rental housing units for low-income families. The Project will be income and rent restricted for tenants between 35% and 60% of the Area Median Income. The proposed Project will both improve the quality of housing provided by the properties and protect residents most vulnerable from displacement. The Sycamore Project was built in 1996-1998 and the La Playa Project was built in 1994 and both properties are in need of material upgrades to systems and unit interiors.
The major source of funding will be from the federal Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program which involves issuance of bonds. (The Owner has not asked for any City assistance.) The Owner has requested that the California Municipal Finance Authority (“CMFA”) act as its issuer of the tax exempt revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $28,000,000. As part of this transaction, ownership will be under Mercy Housing California 72, L.P., a California
23.1 limited partnership (the “Borrower”). The Sycamore Project will be allocated no more than $24,640,000 and the La Playa Project will be allocated no more than $3,360,000.
Following a similar process as the 100% affordable Water Street Apartments, CMFA would issue the tax-exempt revenue bonds. The CMFA was created on January 1, 2004 pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement to promote economic, cultural and community development, through the financing of economic development and charitable activities throughout California.
To date, over 300 municipalities, including the City of Santa Cruz, have become members of CMFA. The CMFA was formed to assist local governments, non-profit organizations and businesses with the issuance of taxable and tax-exempt bonds aimed at improving the standard of living in California. The CMFA’s representatives and its Board of Directors have considerable experience in bond financings. No liability for debt repayment is attributed to the City as the local government agency.
Mercy Housing California (“MHC”) is an affordable housing developer who provides “service enriched” housing programs to over 20,000 low income residents across the state. MHC will serve as the manager of Mercy Housing California 72 LLC, the general partner of Borrower, and provide access to resources for residents at the Project. This housing model is based on the concept of providing programs and services that meet the diverse but specific needs of resident populations. These services provide the resources and support necessary for extremely low-, very low-, and low-income residents to improve their lives. Sample programs include health and wellness programs, after school enrichment, financial stability resources and community empowerment opportunities. The apartments will be managed post-closing by MHC, with experience managing 155 rental properties with over 20,000 residents in California.
The Borrower, will acquire and rehabilitate the Project, which will remain as two 100% deed restricted affordable housing properties reserving homes for low-, very low- and extremely-low income residents. There will be a regulatory agreement for each property recorded at closing which will be in place for at least a 57-year term.
The City currently has multiple ongoing agreements for both properties. The Sycamore Project currently has over ~$900,000 in outstanding loans, including accrued interest, with the City of Santa Cruz. Borrower is requesting the outstanding loans be consolidated and the terms be extended beyond current anticipated due dates (some in 2025 and 2026). The La Playa Project has over ~$840,000 in outstanding loans, including accrued interest, with the City. Borrower is requesting the outstanding loans for the La Playa Project be consolidated as able and the terms be extended past current anticipated due dates (some occurring this year, others in 2024). City is also being requested to subordinate the outstanding loans to senior lenders (same as the existing loan structure) to accommodate the issuance of the bond funds. By utilizing the tax-exempt bonds the buyer will be able to substantially rehab the Project with much needed improvements.
DISCUSSION: In order for all or a portion of the Bonds to qualify as tax-exempt bonds, the City of Santa Cruz must conduct a public hearing (the “TEFRA Hearing”) providing for the members of the community an opportunity to speak in favor of or against the use of tax-exempt bonds for the financing of the Project. Prior to such TEFRA Hearing, reasonable notice must be provided to the members of the community. Following the close of the TEFRA Hearing, an “applicable elected representative” of the governmental unit hosting the Project must provide its approval of the issuance of the Bonds for the financing of the Project. This April 12, 2022 City Council meeting has been duly noticed as that TEFRA hearing.
23.2 Staff is making the recommendation for Council to adopt a resolution approving the issuance of tax-exempt revenue bonds of up to $28,000,000 by CMFA for the purpose of assisting in the implementation of the Project. The Bonds to be issued by the CMFA for the Project will be the sole responsibility of the Borrower, and the City will have no financial, legal, moral obligation, liability or responsibility for the Project or the repayment of the Bonds for the financing of the Project. All financing documents with respect to the issuance of the Bonds will contain clear disclaimers that the Bonds are not obligations of the City or the State of California but are to be paid for solely from funds provided by the Borrower.
The Board of Directors of the California Foundation for Stronger Communities, a California non-profit public benefit corporation (the “Foundation”), acts as the Board of Directors for the CMFA. Through its conduit issuance activities, the CMFA shares a portion of the issuance fees it receives with its member communities and donates a portion of these issuance fees to the Foundation for the support of local charities. With respect to the City of Santa Cruz, it is expected that a portion of the issuance fee attributable to the City will be granted by the CMFA to the City’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund. Such grant may be used for any lawful purpose of the City.
As noted above, Borrower is requesting the outstanding loans for the Sycamore Project and the La Playa Project be consolidated and the terms be extended past current anticipated due dates (ranging from 2022 to 2025). City is also being requested to subordinate the outstanding loans to senior lenders (same as the existing loan structure) to accommodate the issuance of the bond funds.
FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no negative fiscal impact to the City. As stated above, the bonds to be issued by the CMFA for the Project will be the sole responsibility of the Borrower, and the City will have no financial, legal, moral obligation, liability or responsibility for the Project or the repayment of the bonds for the financing of the Project. The City Affordable Housing Trust Fund is expected to receive a portion of the issuance fee to be granted by CMFA.
Prepared By:
Jessica de Wit
Housing and Community
Development Manager
Jessica Mellor
Management Analyst
Submitted By:
Bonnie Lipscomb
Director of Economic
Development
Approved By:
Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. RESOLUTION.DOCX
23.3 RESOLUTION NO. NSRESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ APPROVING
THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY OF
REVENUE BONDS IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $28,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING TWO AFFORDABLE MULTIFAMILY
RENTAL HOUSING FACILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA 72, L.P. AND/OR MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA (OR AN AFFILIATE OF
EITHER), AND CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO
WHEREAS, Mercy Housing California 72, L.P., a California limited partnership, or another entity to be established by Mercy Housing California or an affiliate thereof (collectively, the “Borrower”), has requested that California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”) issue one or more series of revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $28,000,000 (the “Bonds”) for the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvement and equipping of two separate affordable multifamily rental housing facilities located in the City of Santa Cruz, California (the “City”), including (i) a 60-unit rental facility providing housing to large-family households at 125 Sycamore Street, for which Bonds in an amount not to exceed $24,640,000 will be allocated, and (ii) an eight-unit rental facility providing housing to low-income families at 216 Leibrandt Avenue, for which Bonds in an amount not to exceed $3,360,000 will be allocated, both to be owned and/or operated by the Borrower (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Cruz is a member of the Authority; and WHERAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority must be approved by the City because the Project is located within the territorial limits of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) is the elected legislative body of the City and is one of the “applicable elected representatives” required to approve the issuance of the Bonds under Section 147(f) of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Authority has requested that the City Council approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority in order to satisfy the public approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Code and the requirements of Section 4 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the California Municipal Finance Authority, dated as of January 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”), among certain local agencies, including the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, the City Council has, following notice duly given, held a public hearing regarding the issuance of the Bonds, and now desires to approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority; and WHEREAS, the City Council understands that its actions in holding this public hearing and in approving this Resolution do not obligate the City in any manner for payment of the
23.4 RESOLUTION NO. NS2
principal, interest, fees or any other costs associated with the issuance of the Bonds, and said City Council expressly conditions its approval of this Resolution on that understanding.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz as follows:
Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority in an amount not to exceed $28,000,000, to be allocated among the Project sites as provided above.
It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this resolution constitute approval of the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority, for the purposes of (a) Section 147(f) of the Code by the applicable elected representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is located, in accordance with said Section 147(f) and (b) Section 4 of the Agreement.
Section 3. The officers of the City Council are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and execute and deliver any and all documents, certificates and other instruments which they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this Resolution and the financing transaction approved hereby. Any actions heretofore taken by such officers are hereby ratified and approved.
Section 4. The City Council expressly conditions its approval of this Resolution on its understanding that the City shall have no obligation whatsoever to pay any principal, interest, fees or any other costs associated with the Authority's issuance of the Loan for the financing of the Project.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the Authority in care of its counsel:
Ronald E. Lee, Esq.
Jones Hall, APLC
475 Sansome Street. Suite 1700
San Francisco, CA 94111
Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its passage and approval.
23.5 RESOLUTION NO. NS3
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
APPROVED: ______________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
23.6 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ REPEALING CHAPTER 5.81 OF THE SANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING CHAPTER 5.82 - SIDEWALK
VENDING - TO THE SANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, in 2016, the City adopted Santa Cruz Municipal Code (“SCMC”) Chapter
5.81, which was intended to regulate display devices on City property, in a way that permitted First Amendment expressive activity, but did not, in some areas of the City, allow for purely commercial sidewalk vending.
WHEREAS, in 2019, California Senate Bill (“SB”) 946 (Sidewalk Vendors) became law, decriminalizing commercial sidewalk vending and limiting local governments’ ability to restrict sidewalk vending.
WHEREAS, in 2020, the City made limited changes to SCMC Chapter 5.81, with the goal of bringing that section into compliance with SB 946.
WHEREAS, since 2020, it has become clear that, in order to promote public health, safety, and welfare, the City requires a comprehensive City-wide dedicated sidewalk vending permitting and regulation scheme that both complies with state law and is effective at regulating sidewalk vending in public spaces.
WHEREAS, the intent of this ordinance is to effectively regulate sidewalk vending in a way that: (a) complies with state law; (b) addresses objective public health, safety, and welfare concerns; (c) promotes the public’s use and enjoyment of natural resources and recreational opportunities; and (d) prevents an undue concentration of commercial activity that unreasonably interferes with the scenic and natural character of City parks and open spaces.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz as follows:
Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 5.81 is hereby repealed.
Chapter 5.82 (Sidewalk Vending) is hereby added to the Santa Cruz Municipal Code, and it shall read as follows:
“CHAPTER 5.82 - SIDEWALK VENDING
5.82.010 - INTENT AND PURPOSE.
(a) The City Council of the City of Santa Cruz declares that:
(1) If properly regulated, sidewalk vending can foster vibrant public spaces, promote a diverse and inclusive local economy, and create economic opportunities for lowincome and immigrant communities.
24.1 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
2 (2) At the same time, inadequately regulated sidewalk vending has presented unintended negative consequences for the City. For example, sidewalk vending has caused or been associated with unsafe overcrowding; decreased accessibility for persons with disabilities; a lack of adequate access for first responder and emergency personnel; the monopolization of public spaces for private commercial use; traffic safety concerns for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians; diversion of pedestrians into bike lanes or vehicular lanes; parking congestion; accumulation of trash and pollution in public spaces; violent altercations arising from vending “turf wars”; foodborne illnesses; the sale of counterfeit goods; and a lack of sales tax being collected by sidewalk vendors.
(3) Because the City is densely populated by residents and visitors, its public spaces often become extremely crowded. Many of the City’s parks, beaches, the Wharf, Beach St. and the Beach St. Promenade, Pacific Avenue and its side streets, and pedestrian paths are heavily trafficked by the public, and heavy congestion in these places can be constant.
(4) Sidewalk vending must be regulated to address the concerns discussed above. (b) The purpose of this chapter is, therefore, to promote the public peace, safety, health, and welfare by, among other outcomes, ensuring rapid access for first responder and emergency personnel; improving sidewalk accessibility for persons with disabilities; facilitating ingress into and egress from vehicles, rights-of-way, buildings, and public spaces; maximizing use and promoting maintenance of public rights-of-way, parks, beaches, and other public spaces; and reducing the City’s exposure to civil liability. (c) The City desires to accomplish all of the foregoing public health, safety, and welfare policy objectives while simultaneously providing ample public access to desired goods, including culturally significant food and merchandise, and providing ample opportunity for underrepresented community members, including low-income and immigrant communities, to access the formal economy through entrepreneurial sidewalk vending.
5.82.020 - DEFINITIONS.
For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and phrases are defined as follows:
(a) “City demarcated vending and display zones” means those areas specifically set aside for sidewalk vending, operating vending display devices, operating other display devices, and/or conducting first amendment activities. The City demarcated vending and display zones on Pacific Avenue are rectangles marked with brass markers on the sidewalk, and an up-to-date, accurate copy of the map of Pacific Avenue City demarcated vending and display zones shall be posted on the City’s website. The City demarcated vending and display zones on Pacific Avenue must permit a reasonable amount of sidewalk vending on Pacific Avenue, but also must limit vending on Pacific Avenue solely based on objective health, safety, or welfare concerns.
(b) “Director” means the Director of the Planning & Community Development department or their designee.
24.2 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
3 (c) “Farmers’ market” or “certified farmers’ market” means a location operated in accordance with Chapter 10.5 (commencing with Section 47000) of Division 17 of the Food and Agricultural Code and any regulations adopted pursuant to that Chapter. (d) “Food” means raw, cooked, or processed edible substance, ice, beverage, an ingredient used or intended for use or for sale in whole or in part for human consumptions, chewing gum and/or any other items defined as food by the California Retail Food Code. (e) “Food sidewalk vendor” means any type of sidewalk vendor offering products defined as food.
(f) “Mobile vendor” means any person in charge of or driving any motorized mobile vending vehicle requiring a state driver’s license to operate, either as an agent, employee, or otherwise under the direction of the owner.
(g) “No vending or limited vending zone” means an area where sidewalk vending is prohibited or limited due to objective public health, safety, or welfare concerns. The city council may establish no vending or limited vending zones by resolution, as set forth in Section 5.82.080(c).
(h) “Roaming sidewalk vendor” means a sidewalk vendor who moves from place to place and stops only to complete a transaction.
(i) “Sidewalk vending” means to sell, offer for sale, expose or display for sale, solicit offers to purchase, or to barter food, goods, or merchandise on any public sidewalk, pedestrian path, park, or other public property, with or without the assistance of a vending display device, or to require someone to pay a fee or to set, negotiate, or establish a fee before providing any such food, goods, or merchandise, even if characterized by the sidewalk vendor as a donation.
(j) “Sidewalk vending permit” means a permit or card issued by the City to a sidewalk vendor pursuant to Section 5.82.040.
(k) “Sidewalk vendor” means a person who sells food or merchandise from a vending display device or from one’s person, upon a public sidewalk, pedestrian path, park, or other public property. This term is inclusive of both roaming and stationary sidewalk vendors. (l) “Stationary sidewalk vendor” means a sidewalk vendor who vends from a fixed location. (m)“Swap meet” means a location operated in accordance with Article 6 (commencing with Section 21660) of Chapter 9 of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code and any regulations adopted pursuant to that Article.
(n) “Temporary special permit” is any permit issued by the City for the temporary use of, or encroachment on, the sidewalk or other public area, including, but not limited to, an
24.3 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
4 encroachment permit pursuant to Chapter 15.34, a major public special event permit pursuant to Chapter 10.64, or any other type of City-issued temporary event permit, for purposes including, but not limited to, filming, parades, or outdoor concerts. (o) “Vending display device” means a pushcart, stand, display, pedal-driven cart, wagon, showcase, rack, nonmotorized conveyance (including trailers), freestanding table, rack, chair, box, stand, or any container, structure, or other object used or capable of being used for holding, selling, advertising, or displaying tangible things, together with any associated seating facilities. “Vending display device” does not include any street furniture such as benches or planters, any other structure permanently installed by the city of Santa Cruz or with the consent of the city of Santa Cruz, or newsracks placed in conformity with the provisions of this code regulating newsracks.
5.82.030 - SIDEWALK VENDING CONDUCT.
(a) Sidewalk vendors shall comply with this section in order to prevent unreasonable pedestrian and vehicular traffic, improper disposal of trash, provide coastal access, assure that pedestrians (including pedestrians with disabilities) have adequate and accessible thoroughfares, minimize trip and fall hazards, address visibility concerns, prevent glare for drivers, and address other public health, safety, and welfare concerns:
(1) Vending display devices shall be at least eighteen inches in height. No person engaged in sidewalk vending may display or sell their wares on the ground, or on a cloth, tarp, or other similar material on the ground.
(2) No food sidewalk vendor may be accompanied by or in the custody or possession of a dog or any other animal. Merchandise sidewalk vendors may have one leashed animal. (3) To maintain accessibility standards, sidewalk vendors shall not place or allow any obstruction to be placed on the sidewalk that would reduce the width of the sidewalk to a minimum of forty-eight (48) inches excluding curb, except for the brief duration of time for a roaming sidewalk vendor to conduct a sale. Sidewalk vendors shall maintain their vending display devices at all times in a manner that provides sufficient access to the sidewalk and avoids impeding the flow of pedestrian traffic. At no time, may a sidewalk vendor operate in such a fashion that would violate the Americans with Disabilities Act or state law on accessibility, or cause the sidewalk to narrow in a fashion that violates the accessible path of travel for persons with disabilities, including persons who use wheelchairs or other mobility devices.
(4) Sidewalk vendors may not use easy-ups, tents, or similar shade structures unless their sidewalk vending permit specifically authorizes such use. Use of these types of structures may be requested in a sidewalk vending permit application. (See Section
5.82.050.)
(5) Sidewalk vendors shall not vend to occupants of motorized vehicles in operation.
24.4 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
5 (6) Sidewalk vendors may not engage in vending in such a manner as to cause onlookers, customers, or others to obstruct the accessible path of travel for persons with disabilities, or the free flow or view of pedestrian or vehicular traffic. (7) To maintain the free movement of pedestrians and/or vehicles, sidewalk vendors may not use signs in connection with the sale, display, or offering for sale of items, except for those signs affixed to or painted on a vending display device. (8) Vendors may not use generators unless their sidewalk vending permit explicitly allows for generator use. Use of generators may be requested in a sidewalk vending permit application. (See Section 5.82.050.)
(9) Sidewalk vendors must provide a trash receptacle for customers and employ good faith efforts to ensure proper disposal of customer trash. Prior to leaving any vending location, the sidewalk vendor shall pick up, remove, and dispose of all trash generated by the vending operations and/or the vendor’s customers within a fifteen-foot (15’) radius of the vending location. Sidewalk vendors are responsible for disposing of the trash associated with their business and may not use City receptacles for this purpose. (10) Sidewalk vendors must properly dispose of fats, grease, and oil as required in Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 16.19.
(11) At all times while vending, food sidewalk vendors shall possess and display in plain view on the vending display device a valid permit from the County of Santa Cruz Environmental Health Division.
(12) At all times while vending, sidewalk vendors shall possess and display in plain view on their person or on their vending display device a valid sidewalk vending permit issued pursuant to Section 5.82.040.
(13) Sidewalk vendors shall be responsible for their own compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, including without limitation state food preparation, handling, and labeling requirements; fire codes and regulations; noise standards; alcoholic beverages, tobacco products, cannabis, electronic cigarette, smoking devices and controlled substances regulations; sanitation and health standards set for in Title 6 and 16 including, but not limited to, the product regulations set forth in SCMC 6.48 (Environmentally Acceptable Food Packaging), SCMC 6.49 (City of Santa Cruz Bag Reduction Ordinance), and SCMC 16.19 (Storm Water and Urban Runoff Pollution Control); and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and other disability access standards (both state and federal).
(14) Vending display devices shall not be chained, fastened, or affixed at any time to any building or structure, including but not limited to, lampposts, parking meters, traffic signals, fire hydrants, benches, bus shelters, trash cans, street signs, trees, or other objects within the public right-of-way. No vending display device shall become
24.5 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
6 a permanent fixture on the vending site or be considered an improvement to real property.
(15) Vending display devices shall not be left or stored unattended on public property or within the public right-of-way.
(16) Sidewalk vendors shall not vend or distribute: (A) live animals, wildlife, fish, fowl, or insects; (B) items prohibited from being sold or distributed by SCMC 6.48 (Environmentally Accepted Food Packaging) or SCMC 6.49 (City of Santa Cruz Bag Reduction Ordinance), or (C) items that are otherwise illegal to sell or distribute under other laws (such as unlawful narcotics, weapons, and counterfeit merchandise). Note that the unlawful possession or distribution of items is punishable according to the terms of applicable federal, state, or local law making such possession or distribution illegal. See Section 5.82.140 (c).
(17) Sidewalk vendors shall not use sidewalks or public property as storage for extra inventory, merchandise, or personal belongings, except for: (A) vending display devices, items placed on or in vending display devices, and associated seating, (B) personal belongings wholly contained underneath or inside of a vending display device. (18) No person shall use any street furniture, including any bench, planter, utility cabinet, or other street furniture or structure permanently installed on public property, for the display, sale, or distribution of food, goods, or merchandise. (19) Sidewalk vendors shall not unreasonably interfere with access or use of City infrastructure, including City benches, bike racks, wheelchair access ramps, stairs, parking meters, trash receptacles, or recycling receptacles. (20) Sidewalk vendors shall not unreasonably block access to or create unreasonable congestion at: (A) a corner of any street intersection, (B) any fire hydrant, fire call box, emergency exit, or other emergency facility, (C) any curb which is designated as white, yellow, green, blue, or red zone, or a bus zone; (D) any building entrance or stairway access point; (E) any driveway or driveway apron; (F) upon or within any roadway, median strip, or dividing section; or (G) at any parking pay station. Vending or operating in a way that violates the accessible path of travel for persons with disabilities is per se unreasonable.
(21) Trailers are not permitted on the sidewalk pursuant to California Vehicle Code 22500(f). Violation of this rule is punishable in accordance with the terms of the California Vehicle Code.
(22) Sidewalk vendors shall not operate or vend in a way that violates the terms or conditions of their sidewalk vending permit or parks vending permit (if applicable). (b) The city manager or their designee may promulgate regulations governing sidewalk vending to effectuate the provisions of this chapter and to address objective health, safety
24.6 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
7 and welfare concerns. A violation of such regulations shall constitute a separate violation of this chapter.
5.82.040 - SIDEWALK VENDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
(a) No person may engage in sidewalk vending in the City without first obtaining: (1) a sidewalk vending permit issued pursuant to this section; (2) a business license issued pursuant to Chapter 5.04; (3) if applicable, a mobile vending permit issued pursuant to Chapter 5.22; and 4) if applicable, a parks vending permit, issued pursuant to Section
5.82.090 of this chapter.
(b) To apply for a sidewalk vending permit, the sidewalk vendor applicant must file an application with the Planning & Community Development Department, accompanied by an application fee in an amount established by resolution of the City Council. The application shall be in a form prescribed by the Director and shall contain the following:
(1) The legal name and current address, telephone number, and email address of the applicant, who must be a natural person (i.e., an individual human being and not a corporation, firm, partnership, etc.);
(2) If sidewalk vending as a representative of a firm, association, or partnership, the name and address thereof and the names and residences of partners or association members.
If sidewalk vending as a representative of a corporation, the name and address thereof and the names and residences of officers and a local manager; (3) If applicable, the vehicle identification number, make, model and engine number, and photograph of any mobile vending vehicles (as defined in SCMC Section 5.22.010(b)) proposed to be operated in conjunction with any proposed sidewalk vending operations, or so much of said information as is available at the time of application; (4) A description of the food or merchandise offered for sale; (5) A description of, along with the dimensions of, the vending display device that will be used;
(6) The hours per day and the days per week during which the applicant sidewalk vendor proposes to operate;
(7) A description of the area(s) where the applicant sidewalk vendor wishes to operate; (8) Whether the applicant intends to operate as a stationary sidewalk vendor or a roaming sidewalk vendor;
(9) A sidewalk vendor applicant must provide a copy of a valid business license issued pursuant to City of Santa Cruz Municipal Code 5.04 prior to issuance of a sidewalk vending permit;
24.7 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
8 (10) A copy of a valid California’s seller’s permit pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6067;
(11) A copy of the applicant’s California driver’s license, California identification card, US Passport, individual taxpayer identification number, federal identification number, or other identification number or card issued by a foreign government; (12) Certification by the applicant, under penalty of perjury that the information contained in the application is true to their knowledge and belief; (13) If a food sidewalk vendor, proof of all required approval(s) from the County of Santa Cruz Environmental Health Division and copies of any applicable discharge permits;
(14) An acknowledgement of having read and an agreement to abide by this SCMC Chapter 5.82 (Sidewalk Vending), SCMC Chapter 6.48 (Environmentally Acceptable Food Packaging), SCMC 6.49 (City of Santa Cruz Bag Reduction Ordinance), and SCMC Chapter 16.19 (Urban Runoff Pollution Control); and (15) The following release, indemnification, and acknowledgement requirements:
(A)An agreement by the applicant to waive and release the City and its officers, agents, employees, contractors, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, costs, liabilities, expenses, or judgments (including attorneys fees and court costs) related to or arising out of the applicant’s sidewalk vending activities. (B) An agreement by the applicant to, to the greatest extent allowed by law, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, and volunteers from and against any and all claims related to or arising out of the applicant’s sidewalk vending activities.
(C) An acknowledgement and agreement that the applicant’s use of the sidewalk or other City facilities is at the applicant’s own risk, and it is not the City’s responsibility to ensure that the vending location is safe or conducive to the vending activities.
5.82.050 - SIDEWALK VENDING PERMIT APPROVAL, CONDITIONS, DENIAL, OR REVOCATION.
(a) The Director or their designee shall approve the issuance of the sidewalk vending permit unless they determine that:
(1) Information contained in the application, or supplemental information requested from the applicant, is false in any material detail; or
24.8 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
9 (2) The proposed operations contained in the application are contrary to the provisions of this Chapter, or are contrary to any regulations promulgated pursuant to Section
5.82.030 (b); or
(3) The applicant has failed to provide a complete application, after having been notified of the requirement to produce additional information or documents; or (4) The applicant has failed to demonstrate an ability to conform to the operating standards set forth in this Chapter or any standards set forth in regulations promulgated pursuant to Section 5.82.030 (b); or
(5) The applicant has failed to pay or otherwise resolve any previous administrative citations associated with a previous violation of this chapter; or (6) The location of the proposed vending operations has already been approved for another use (including potentially other vending operations) at the time the applicant proposes to vend at the subject location; or
(7) The proposed vending operations are illegal, and/or the City’s approval of a sidewalk vending permit would be contrary to legal requirements applicable to the City.
(b) If the permit is denied, written notice of such denial and the reasons therefore shall be provided to the applicant.
(c) The Director or their designee may add reasonable sidewalk vending permit conditions, regulating the time, place, and manner of sidewalk vending. Such conditions must be (1) consistent with this Chapter and any regulations promulgated pursuant to Section 5.82.030 (b), and (2) directly related to objective public health, safety, welfare concerns, or directly related to legal requirements applicable to the City.
(d) Use of a shade structure may be requested in a sidewalk vending permit application, and such request will be granted if: (1) there is adequate space for the shade structure at the proposed vending location (including any space needed for pedestrians (including disabled pedestrians), vehicles, and bicyclists), (2) use of the shade structure at the proposed location would not adversely impact or put at risk public health, safety, or welfare, and (3) use of the shade structure at the proposed location would not be contrary to legal requirements applicable to the City.
(e) Use of a generator may be requested in a sidewalk vending permit application, and such request will be granted if the proposed generator use: (1) will not create unreasonable noise, trip and fall hazards, or other adverse risks or impacts to public health, safety, or welfare; (2) is not otherwise illegal or contrary to legal requirements applicable to the City; and (3) is approved by all appropriate regulating entities, such as the Monterey Bay Air Resources District (MBARD), if those appropriate regulating entities require generator use approval.
24.9 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
10 (f) The Director or their designee may revoke a sidewalk vending permit for a fourth or subsequent violation of this chapter. A sidewalk vendor whose permit is revoked may apply for a new sidewalk vending permit upon the expiration of the term of the rescinded permit. (g) Any person whose application for a sidewalk vending permit is denied, revoked, or conditioned in a way that the applicant believes is not in accordance with applicable legal requirements may appeal such decision to the City Manager by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Manager or their designee within 10 calendar days after receipt of the notice of denial, conditions, or revocation. The appeal hearing shall be conducted pursuant to the administrative enforcement hearing procedure contained in Title 4 of this Code.
5.82.060 - SIDEWALK VENDING PERMIT EXPIRATION AND RENEWAL.
A sidewalk vending permit shall be valid for twelve (12) months from the date of issuance, except that a City sidewalk vending permit shall be deemed null and void upon the revocation or expiration of: (a) the related City issued business license, (b) a required permit from the Santa Cruz County Department of Environmental Health, and/or (c) the California’s seller’s permit pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6067.
5.82.070 - PERMIT APPLICABILITY.
(a) A sidewalk vending permit shall only permit the operation of one vending display device at any one time.
(b) No permit granted pursuant to this chapter shall be transferable.
5.82.080 - RESTRICTED VENDING TIMES AND LOCATIONS.
(a) Unless specifically permitted by another provision of this municipal code, to ensure rapid access by first responder and emergency personnel; to improve sidewalk accessibility for persons with disabilities; to facilitate ingress into and egress from vehicles, rights-of-way, buildings, and public spaces; to maximize use and promote maintenance of public rightsof-way, parks, the beach, and other public spaces; to help preserve and protect sensitive habitats, community landmarks, natural and scenic areas and the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary; and to reduce the City’s exposure to civil liability, stationary sidewalk vending is not permitted in the following limited areas:
(1) Year round, in areas on Pacific Avenue that are outside of the City demarcated vending and display zones;
(2) Year round, in any City Park or beach where the City has entered into an agreement for concessions that exclusively permits the sale of food or merchandise by the concessionaire;
(3) Within five hundred feet (500’) of a permitted certified farmer’s market, a swap meet, or an area designated for a temporary special permit. This prohibition shall be limited to the operating hours of the farmer’s market or swap meet, or the limited duration of the temporary special permit;
24.10 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
11 (4) Year round, in areas that are zoned exclusively residential, including within residentially zoned parks; and
(5) Year round, within the City’s open space, natural, and scenic areas, which includes Arana Gulch, Pogonip, Moore Creek, the San Lorenzo Riverwalk, and the West Cliff Drive pedestrian / bike path.
(b) For the same reasons identified in subdivision (a) above, both stationary and roaming sidewalk vending shall not be permitted in the following limited areas:
(1) From April 1 until October 31, on the streets and sidewalks of Beach Street between the Municipal Wharf and Third Street;
(2) Year round, on the vehicle and pedestrian thoroughfares of the Santa Cruz Municipal Wharf;
(3) Year round, on that portion of Main Beach over which the city has an easement for recreation and beach purposes only pursuant to a 1933 superior court judgment quieting title to the Seaside Company, which mandates “that no peddling, soliciting or bartering shall be permitted thereon”;
(4) Year round, on the Beach Street Promenade Deck; and (5) Year round, on a bike path, a street (including within on-street parking spaces), within a driveway, or in a public parking lot.
(c) The city council, by resolution, may from time-to-time designate no vending or limited vending zones due to objective health, safety, or welfare concerns. In designating a no vending or limited vending zone, the city council shall first determine that vending without limitation in the area would impede or interfere with public health, safety, or welfare. (d) This section shall not be construed as prohibiting events that are conducted pursuant to, and in accordance with, Chapters 10.64, Major Special Events and 10.65, Public Gathering and Expression Events.
5.82.090 - VENDING IN CITY BEACHES AND PARKS.
(a) An additional parks vending permit is required for sidewalk vendors who wish to operate in a City park, beach, or other facility within the jurisdiction of the parks and recreation department. No person may vend in a City park, City beach, or facility within the jurisdiction of the parks and recreation department without first obtaining a parks vending permit.
(b) The director of parks and recreation, or their designee, may refuse to grant a parks vending permit if:
24.11 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
12 (1) the sidewalk vendor does not yet have a sidewalk vending permit; or (2) if granting the parks vending permit would negatively impact objective health, safety, or welfare concerns; or
(3) if denial is necessary to ensure the public’s use and enjoyment of natural resources or recreational opportunities; or
(4) if denial of the permit is necessary to prevent an undue concentration of commercial activity that unreasonably interferes with the scenic and natural character of the park or beach; or
(5) if the location of the proposed vending operations has already been approved for another use (including potentially other vending operations) at the time the applicant proposes to vend at the subject location; or
(6) if the vending operations are illegal, or the City’s approval of the permit would be contrary to legal requirements imposed on the City.
(c) If the permit is denied, written notice of such denial and the reasons therefore shall be provided to the applicant.
(d) The director of parks and recreation, or their designee, may attach conditions to a parks vending permit. All conditions must be: (1) directly related to objective health, safety, welfare concerns, or directly related to legal requirements imposed on the City; or (2) necessary to ensure the public’s use and enjoyment of natural resources and recreational opportunities; or (3) necessary to prevent an undue concentration of commercial activity that unreasonably interferes with the scenic and natural character of the park. (e) Any person aggrieved by a decision of the parks and recreation department to issue, deny issuance, condition, or rescind a parks vending permit may appeal the decision to the City Manager or their designee within 10 calendar days after receipt of the notice of denial, conditions, or revocation. The appeal hearing shall be conducted pursuant to the administrative enforcement hearing procedure contained in Title 4 of this Code. If the appeal is successful, the hearing officer shall order the City to return the fee paid for appeal.
5.82.100 - MOBILE VENDING PERMIT REQUIRED.
All mobile vendors require a mobile vending permit, issued pursuant to Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 5.22.
5.82.110 ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS.
(a) Unless otherwise provided, a violation of this chapter by a sidewalk vendor who has a valid sidewalk vending permit from the City is punishable only by an administrative citation pursuant to Chapter 4, in amounts not to exceed the following:
(1) One hundred dollars ($100.00) for a first violation.
24.12 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
13 (2) Two hundred dollars ($200.00) for a second violation within one (1) year of the first violation.
(3) Five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each additional violation within one (1) year of the first violation.
(b) Unless otherwise provided, person engaged in sidewalk vending without a valid City sidewalk vending permit (and/or a parks vending permit, if applicable) shall be issued an administrative citation pursuant to Chapter 4 in amounts not to exceed the following, in lieu of the amounts set forth in paragraph (a):
(1) Two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) for a first violation. (2) Five hundred dollars ($500.00) for a second violation within one (1) year of the first violation.
(3) One thousand dollars ($1,000) for each additional violation within one (1) year of the first violation.
(c) A person issued an administrative citation pursuant to subsection (b), upon submitting proof of a valid sidewalk vending permit issued by the City (and/or a parks vending permit, if applicable) within ten (10) calendar days of the date a citation is issued, may have the amount of their citation reduced to amounts set forth in paragraph (a). (d) Unless otherwise provided, a violation of this chapter shall not be punishable as an infraction or misdemeanor. No person alleged to have violated the provisions herein shall be subject to arrest except when otherwise permitted by law. (e) If an individual violates this chapter and is issued an administrative citation, that person is required to come into reasonably prompt compliance with this Chapter. If a cited individual continues to operate unlawfully and/or fails to come into reasonably prompt compliance with this Chapter, the individual may be issued a subsequent administrative citation on the same day, so long as at least one (1) hour has passed between each administrative citation. (f) In order to facilitate the administration of this chapter, City enforcement staff is authorized to ask sidewalk vendors who are reasonably believed to be vending in violation of this chapter for their identification card, or other identifying information, and said individuals are required to provide such information to the requesting enforcement staff. (g) A person who is issued an administrative citation(s) may appeal their administrative citation(s), within 10 calendar days of issuance. The appeal hearing shall be conducted pursuant to the administrative enforcement hearing procedure contained in Title 4 of this Code. If the appeal is successful, the hearing officer shall order the City to return the fee paid for appeal.
24.13 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
14 (h) The City shall also provide a person who receives a citation with notice of their right to request an ability-to-pay determination and shall make available instructions or other materials for requesting an ability-to-pay determination. The person may request an abilityto-pay determination at any time before the assessed fine is paid, including while a judgment remains unpaid, when a case is delinquent, or when a fine has been referred to a comprehensive collection program. There shall be no charge for an ability-to-pay determination.
(i) If the person meets the criteria described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Government Code Section 68632, the City shall accept, in full satisfaction, twenty percent (20%) of the fee assessed for an administrative citation imposed pursuant to this chapter. (j) The City may develop processes or regulations that would (1) allow for a person to complete community service in lieu of paying the total administrative fine; (2) provide for waivers of the administrative fine; or (3) provide for the offering of alternative dispositions. (k) Administrative citations issued under this section shall include the following notice: “You have a right to appeal this citation within 10 calendar days. If you do not appeal, you waive your right to appeal. You also have the right to request an ability-to-pay determination at any time before the assessed fine has been paid.”
(l) Failure to pay the assessed fine issued pursuant to this section shall not be punishable as an infraction or misdemeanor. Additional fines, fees, assessments, or any other financial conditions beyond those authorized herein shall not be assessed for failure to pay an administrative citation fine.
(m)No person shall willfully interfere with or obstruct any City code enforcement officer, CSO, or police officer in their enforcement of the provisions of this chapter. Willful (1) failure to properly identify oneself done for the purpose of attempting to evade an administrative citation, and/or (2) interference with or obstruction of an impoundment authorized pursuant to Section 5.82.120, shall constitute unlawful interference or obstruction under this subdivision. Violation of this subdivision is a misdemeanor.
5.82.120 – IMPOUNDMENT.
(a) The City may impound vending display devices, food, goods, and/or merchandise that:
(1) reasonably appear to be abandoned on public property; or (2) are displayed, offered, or made available for rent or sale by a sidewalk vendor who (A) operates in violation of this chapter; and (B) refuses or fails to provide identification, as required by Section 5.82.110(f); and (C) refuses to remove their vending display device, food for sale, and/or goods/merchandise for sale after being instructed to do so by a City enforcement official; or
(3) are displayed, offered, or made available for rent or sale by a sidewalk vendor who (A) does not possess a valid applicable sidewalk vending permit (and/or, if
24.14 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
15 applicable, a valid applicable parks vending permit); and (B) also refuses to remove their vending display device, food for sale, and/or goods/merchandise for sale after being instructed to do so by a City enforcement official; or (4) is (A) creating an imminent and substantial safety or environmental hazard by the location of the vending display device or the nature of the goods being offered for sale, and (B) refuses to remove their vending display device, food for sale, and/or goods/merchandise for sale after being instructed to do so by a City enforcement official; or
(5) are displayed, offered, or made available for rent or sale by a sidewalk vendor who has, within a 24-month period, been found responsible for violating this chapter four or more times.
(b) The City may immediately dispose of impounded materials that are perishable or cannot be safely stored.
(c) An aggrieved vendor may, within 10 days, appeal the impoundment of their property by requesting an administrative hearing before a hearing officer appointed by the City under Title 4, and if successful in their appeal, may have their property returned without paying an impound fee. The appeal hearing shall be conducted pursuant to the administrative enforcement hearing procedure contained in Title 4 of this Code. Any appeal fee paid by the sidewalk vendor shall be returned to the sidewalk vendor if they are successful on appeal.
(d) An individual may recover impounded materials upon paying applicable impound fees and demonstrating proper proof of ownership.
(e) The City Council may by resolution adopt impound fees, which shall reflect the City’s enforcement, investigation, storage, and impound costs. (f) Any unclaimed items will be considered abandoned and forfeited to the City after 90 days following impoundment.
5.82.130 - NON-APPLICABILITY.
The restrictions in this chapter do not apply to individuals or groups engaged solely in artistic performance, free speech, political or petitioning activities, or engaged solely in the free distribution of items constituting expressive activity protected by the First Amendment, such as newspapers, leaflets, and pamphlets.
5.82.140 INTERPRETATION OF CHAPTER.
(a) Unless otherwise stated, the rules set forth in this chapter shall apply citywide. (b) Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted as prohibiting properly licensed mobile vendors from operating in accordance with the terms of their mobile vending permit issued pursuant to SCMC Chapter 5.22.
24.15 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
16 (c) Nothing in this chapter is intended to preempt or replace federal, state, or local criminal or civil law on issues that are not wholly related to or arising from sidewalk vending (e.g, issues such as the sale of narcotics, copyright/trademark infringement, laws addressing unlawful dumping and littering, etc.).
(d) If any subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter. The city council hereby declares that it would have adopted this section, and each and every subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional, without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.
(e) Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted or applied so as to create any requirement, power, or duty in conflict with any federal or state law. (f) In enacting and implementing this chapter, the city is assuming an undertaking to promote the general welfare. It is not assuming, nor is it imposing on its officers and employees, an obligation for breach of which it is liable in money damages to any person who claims that such breach proximately caused injury.”
PASSED FOR PUBLICATION this 22nd day of March, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Kalantari-Johnson, Golder, Meyers; Vice Mayor Watkins.
NOES: Councilmembers Cummings, Brown; Mayor Brunner.
ABSENT: None.
DISQUALIFIED: None.
APPROVED: ______________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
24.16 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-03
17 PASSED FOR FINAL ADOPTION this __ day of _______ 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
APPROVED: ______________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
This is to certify that the above and
foregoing document is the original
of Ordinance No. 2022-03 and that
it has been published or posted in
accordance with the Charter of the
City of Santa Cruz.
________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
24.17 Proof of Publication
(2015 C.C.P.)
I, the undersigned, declare:
That I caused the attached legal notice/advertisement to be published in the Santa Cruz Good Times, a weekly newspaper published and circulated in the County of Santa Cruz, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of California in and for the County of Santa Cruz, under Proceeding No. 68833; and that the legal notice/advertisement was published in the above-named newspaper on the following date(s), to wit:
April 6, 2022
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
This 6th day of April, 2022, Santa Cruz, California
____________________________
Julia Wood
Deputy City Clerk Administrator
Julia Wood
24.18 DECLARATION OF POSTING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ )
On the 29th day of March, 2022, I posted conspicuously in three public places within the City of Santa Cruz, Ordinance No. 2022-03, to wit:
1. City Hall: 809 Center Street: Bulletin Board outside Room 9/10
2. City Hall: Bulletin Board outside Council Chambers
3. The City of Santa Cruz website
The document, posted in its entirety, consists of pages 1—17.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 29th day of March, 2022, in Santa Cruz, California.
_______________________________
Julia Wood
Deputy City Clerk Administrator
Julia Wood
24.19 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2022 4:44 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Unacceptable Conditions on Beach Street
Dear Santa Cruz City Council,
I hope you vote to put into law the sidewalk vending ordinance at your next city council meeting. Please view this street brawl that was filmed by a tourist from San Francisco and posted on Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/jakemclelan/videos/5076185732494441 I hope you are as alarmed as I am viewing this video. This is not acceptable or excusable in any way.
It is obvious turf wars for space on Beach Street is occurring. This video is just one incident being caught.
Many more have been witnessed and others have noticed the multiple booths all have the same colored tenting and style. This is not a grass roots movement of individual vendors trying to eek out a living on the street. It appears to be an organized "owner" who is setting up multiple booths selling unlicensed items and food items that have not been inspected or permitted by the county health department. I am concerned about the safety of the people working these booths as well. How many are earning at least a minimum wage? How many have any benefits afforded them by the state of California in regards to work place safety? Are any of these people being trafficked? The law that was passed by the state of California to limit a city's ability to regulate street vending may have been good intentioned, but it was seriously flawed and not well thought out. I am not opposed to a street vending program that truly empowers local residents, but it needs to be regulated, not involve street food unless the county has the time to do actual enforcement of food safety laws and permits need to be involved. We are moving into a dangerous situation where individuals see vending spaces as their territory and resort to physical violence to chase someone out who is not part of their crew.
Allowing unregulated street vending is not empowering or helpful. I want to lift people up in a way that doesn't require them to be exploited by a boss or gangster who resorts to physical violence to protect their ill-conceived notion that they own certain spots on public streets to sell what appears to be mostly crap to unsuspecting tourists. If these bosses are willing to beat people up in public, what do you think they are doing in private to the people working for them? Please pass the sidewalk vending ordinance and work with the California League of Cities to overturn the badly written bill by the California state legislature.
Sincerely,
Richelle Noroyan
24.20 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Dan and Rene' Denevan <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2022 4:05 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Beach Street Sidewalk Vendors
Last weekend I rode my bike down to watch beach volleyball at Main Beach.
There were no benches to sit on at the sidewalk level because the street vendors had co‐opted all of them.
The small portion of available sidewalk alongside the vendors was crushed with people who were then overflowing into the bike lanes and refusing to budge for riders who then had to go further into the roadway.
I personally witnessed people delivering alcohol to vendors to drink on the sidewalk at their stands.
I also saw a small boy wandering in the crowd alone all the way from the boardwalk to the pier (!) ‐ probably 6 or 7 years old ‐ and asked him where his parents were. He did not speak English so I asked passersby until I found one who could translate‐ and he pointed to the boardwalk and said his dad was down there selling stuff on the sidewalk. This child was left unattended and could suffer great harm down there (as has happened before)! I walked him back.
The sidewalk vendor issue is untenable because there is NO ROOM left for the taxpaying PUBLIC to enjoy the use of the sidewalk, bike lanes, and benches. There is nowhere for the elderly to sit, and children should not be milking about unattended while their caretakers are running businesses lease‐free, tax free, and fee free.
Thank you, Rene Denevan
Sent from my iPhone
24.21 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Peter Gelblum <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2022 5:17 PM
To: City Council; Bonnie Bush; Tony Condotti; Donna Meyers; Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson; Sonja Brunner; Sandy Brown; Renee Golder; Martine Watkins; Justin Cummings Subject: 4/12 CC meeting Agenda Item 24 - sidewalk vending At an absolute minimum, because of its enormous impact on, and targeting of, Latina/o vendors at the beach, this agenda item should be published immediately in Spanish. If the Ordinance is adopted, it should be widely published and distributed in Spanish.
Thank you for your consideration,
Peter Gelblum
24.22 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Philip Mekis <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 3:38 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Please support the sidewalk vending ordinance
Good afternoon Mayor and Council Members,
I wanted to write to again support passing the vendor ordinance for all of the reasons I wrote in my prior letter.
If you have been in the beach area since the first reading you will notice vendor carts left unattended overnight with exposed propane tanks and impeding the sidewalk, a fight last Saturday over turf, public trash cans and recycling blocked for use, and vendor carts parked in parking stalls.
This situation has only gotten worse and worse and should have been dealt with proactively however it has gone on and on and gotten worse every season. Unfortunately the situation is to the point based on the studies done that it will cost our already strapped city hundreds of thousands of dollars to deal with while at the same time the vendor presence do not pay into the local tax base that local business' do, currently vending is in its current state is nothing but a blight and outright disrespect to our city.
Please take action, I know the vendors are not low hanging fruit however their negative impact will continue to detriment the city from ecological, environmental to flat out monetary sales tax income. Beyond the small local vendors that have operated for decades with the surrounding business' these new vendors from out of the area have zero respect for our city nor their customers which can be seen in a number of ways. I have not seen one positive aspect to these vendors from out of town that have zero respect for our town.
Thank you for upholding the vending ordinance and creating a greener, safer, more environmentally and community focused city.
With all due respect,
Philip Mekis
24.23 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Chris Ferrante <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 4:47 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Street Vending
Dear Councilmembers,
When I bought the Beach Street Inn and Suites in 2010, formerly the Terrace Court Motel, I had a dream…..To renovate the hotel and begin to upgrade Beach Street to the highest level possible. I knew if I took the plunge it would be the catalyst for further improvements. I believe I accomplished my vision. I was so proud to own the Beach Street Inn and Suites and be part of something greater.
Unfortunately, due to the Vending on Beach Street my dream turned into a nightmare. I honestly feel that everything I’ve worked for, invested in, and was so proud to be a part of has fallen by the wayside. It is an embarrassment. We sold the hotel a few months back and when people ask me WHY, I site the Vending as the issue that I just can not overcome.
It is wrong on so many fronts. I did not want to be associated with Beach Street and the unwelcoming activity down there.
I no longer have the ability to influenced change on Beach Street, but you can. I ask that you send a strong message and support your Local, Tax Paying and Legally Employing Businesses by unanimously voting Yes on the ordinance to clean up our Beach area, once again.
If anyone would like to discuss it further, please feel free to call anytime at 831‐252‐1352.
Chris Ferrante
Former owner‐ Beach Street Inn and Suites
24.24 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Bonnie Bush
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 4:51 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Fwd: Item 24 Sidewalk Vending Ordinance (2nd reading) Bonnie Bush, CMC
City Clerk
831-420-5035
Begin forwarded message:
From: Casey Beyer <[email protected]>
Date: April 11, 2022 at 4:14:19 PM PDT
To: Sonja Brunner <[email protected]>, Martine Watkins <[email protected]>, Sandy Brown <[email protected]>, Justin Cummings <[email protected]>, Renee Golder <[email protected]>, Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson <[email protected]>, Donna Meyers <[email protected]>
Cc: Bonnie Bush <[email protected]>, Mark Dettle <[email protected]>, Bernie Escalante <[email protected]>
Subject: Item 24 Sidewalk Vending Ordinance (2nd reading)
Dear Mayor Brunner, Vice Mayor Watkins and Council members Brown, Cummings, Golder, Kalantari‐Johnson and Meyers:
I’m writing on behalf of the Santa Cruz County Chamber of Commerce to ask for your support of the sidewalk vendor ordinance previously approved in March. This ordinance is a necessary step in addressing the unintended consequences caused by street vending on a busy street in the heart of the Beach tourist section of Santa Cruz.
I understand that the intent of the state law, SB 946 was to decriminalize commercial sidewalk vending and limiting local government’s ability to restrict sidewalk, the law unfairly places locally established businesses in harms way as was the case recently when violent acts happened without regard to public health and safety.
Mayor Brunner and Council members Brown and Cummings: I respectfully ask that you support this important ordinance on 2nd reading. I am aware that you voted against the ordinance on the first reading but I assume it was because the amendment to allow some limited vending on Beach Street failed. Now that it has passed 1st reading and is back for final approval, I hope you will stand with the local business community in support of this ordinance.
While the ordinance may be imperfect the ordinance as written is necessary to help our community address the severe and habitual unintended consequences of street vending in a crowded area along our beach corridor and other public spaces such as the Wharf, Beach Stree
24.25 2
and Beach St.Promenade, Pacific Avenue and area side streets and pathways that are heavy traffic areas with pedestrians and vehicles.
Respectfully submitted,
Casey
Casey Beyer
Chief Executive Officer
Santa Cruz County
Chamber of Commerce
(831) 457-3713
24.26 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: Planning
SUBJECT: Municipal Code Amendments Relating to Small Cell Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Responding to Modifications Requested by the California Coastal Commission (PL)
RECOMMENDATION: This item is continued to the April 26, 2022 Council meeting.
25.1 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: Planning
SUBJECT: Slope Regulation Ordinance Amendments to Chapters 18.45, 24.04, 24.08,
24.14, and 24.22 of the Santa Cruz Municipal Code (PL)
RECOMMENDATION: This item is continued to the April 26, 2022 Council meeting.
26.1 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 4/4/2022
AGENDA OF: 4/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Community Development
SUBJECT: Green Building Program Proposed Fee Increase (PL) RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Introduce for publication an amendment to Chapter 24.15, (Green Building Regulations), to specify that the fee associated with the Green Building Educational Resource Fund will be established by resolution of the City Council; and
2) Adopt a resolution to increase the Green Building Fee from 0.0025 to 0.0100 times the overall valuation of a project, to retain the $50,000 fee cap, and to incorporate said fee increase into the City Unified Master Fee Schedule with a footnote that annual Consumer Price Index increases do not apply to the fee; and
3) Direct staff to update all associated fee schedules, such as user-friendly fee schedules developed by staff and post them online, where applicable, for the public.
BACKGROUND: City Municipal Code 24.15, Green Building Regulations, was adopted in 2005 and marked the start of the Green Building Program, a program managed by staff in the Building & Safety Division in the Planning & Community Development Department (Department). The program seeks to promote environmental sustainability including incentives for waste reduction, energy efficiency, water conservation, indoor air quality, and climate protection.
The program was developed and recommended by the Green Building Working Group and introduced by ordinance to Council on October 25, 2005. Section 24.15.080 of the City Municipal Code established a Green Building Education Fee (GBF) to support program costs.
The fee is codified as 0.0025 of project valuation and later included a cap on the fee of $50,000.
DISCUSSION: The GBF has not been increased since 2005, even though employee costs continued to climb and program components have changed. For example, one change was the approval of a full-time Green Building Specialist in 2017. Program expenses and revenues since the program was effective in 2006 are shown in the Green Building Fund Analysis. Based on accounting of the last few fiscal years (FY), revenue (FY 2019 – FY 2021) did not meet annual program expenses. Another deficit is expected for FY 2022 and the current fund balance will not
27.1 support FY 2023 needs. Staff recommends an increase to the Green Building Fee to continue to support the current program.
Current Green Building Program Costs
The Department Principal Management Analyst reviewed current positions allocated to the Green Building program, as well as current services and supplies. Attachment “Fee Increase Analysis” details staff, services, and supplies budgeted as of FY 2021, which was used as the current baseline. The current FY 2022 budget was not used as the baseline for the program because staff anticipated a deficit and reduced the FY 2022 budget to minimize use of dwindling fund reserves. In summary, current costs for the Green Building program include varying percentages of the following staff, and the expenses for the following services and supplies:
Personnel Current
Percent/Amount
Dedicated to GBF
Green Building Specialist 90%
Chief Building Official 20%
Deputy Building Official 30%
Supervising Building Inspector 5%
Senior Building Inspector 5%
Senior Building Inspector 5%
Senior Building/Building Inspector 5%
Management Analyst 5%
Supervising Plans Examiner 20%
Temporary Staff $6,000
Overtime $3,000
Total Personnel (FY 2022 Costs) $305,335
Services and Supplies (as of FY 2021 Budget) $46,285
Examples includes:
Program Services for Green Business Program
Travel and Training for One Individual
Dues & Membership for One Individual
Office Supplies, Small Tools, and Books for One Individual Baseline Program Costs: $351,620
A detailed list of the staff, services, and supply budget for FY 2021 and FY 2022 are in Attachments “Green Building Adopted Budget, FY 2021” and “Green Building Adopted Budget, FY 2022.”
Proposed Green Building Program Costs
In addition to bridging funding gaps for current staff due to employee cost increases over the past few fiscal years, staff reviewed and included costs for:
Adjusted current and considered time allocation of Building & Safety staff, who support the Green Building program.
Other staff who support the Green Building program. For example, the current program budget does not consider all staff support, such as administrative staff who support building inspection and plan review services, or costs for vehicles, services, and supplies
27.2 for other members of the Building & Safety Division who also provide support services for the Green Building Program.
Increased staff cost associated with cost of living increases, merit increases, liability costs, and insurance.
Adjusted supply costs by 3-5% per year to year from FY 2023 – FY 2027 to account for general price adjustments.
The table below includes baseline staffing, increases to current staff, and adds new staff and service supply costs that were not originally considered but support the Green Building program.
Italicized items are changes compared to the current fees.
Proposed:
Personnel Proposed
Percent/Amount
Dedicated to GBF
Green Building Specialist 90%
Chief Building Official 20%
Deputy Building Official 30%
Supervising Building Inspector 8%
Senior Building Inspector 8%
Senior Building Inspector 8%
Senior Building/Building Inspector 8%
Management Analyst 10%
Supervisory Plans Examiner 20%
Senior Plans Examiner 10%
Senior Plans Examiner 10%
Director of Planning & Community Development 0.50%
Assistant Director of Planning & Community Development 0.50% Principal Management Analyst 5%
Records Coordinator 10%
Climate Action Manager 5%
Temporary Staff $25,934
Overtime $3,483
Total Estimated Personnel $460,159
Services and Supplies (as of FY 2021 Budget) $159,897
Examples includes:
Program Services for Green Business Program
Travel and Training for One Individual
Dues & Membership for One Individual
Office Supplies, Small Tools, and Books for One Individual Engineering Fees – Outside
Vehicle Lease
Portion of Travel and Meetings for all other Staff Support Portion of Printing binding, other professional services for all other staff support
Portion of Office Supply, small tools, dues and memberships, and other misc. services and supplies for all other staff support FY 2023 Projected Program Costs: $620,056
27.3 Line item detail is shown in the attached Fee Increase Analysis document, which also shows anticipated costs for FY 2024 – FY 2027. Based on the proposed changes and adjusting to cover current staff cost, it is estimated the change will cost $620,056 to cover anticipated program costs for FY 2023, with increases through FY 2027.
Revenue Projections
The current GBF rate is 0.25% of project valuation and includes a cap of $50,000. To determine the necessary revenue to cover proposed cost of the Green Building program, staff compared what revenues might be raised in prior years had the rate been 0.75%, 1%, and 1.25%.
0.75% 1% 1.25%
FY 2018 $511,171 $648,228 $785.286
FY 2019 $506,100 $621,096 $726,370
FY 2020 $411,485 $571.980 $702,474
FY 2021 $388,941 $501,922 $614,902
Balancing the volatility of this revenue type with addressing cost recovery only, staff recommends increasing the rate to 1% of project valuation, and re-evaluating the fee in FY 2023.
Future Program Considerations: Proposed program changes consider the program as it stands currently and does not include future changes that may be considered by the Chief Building Official and Director of Planning & Community Development. Considerations presented focus on ensuring the current program is fiscally sustainable based on current program structure. If the scope of the program grows, is modified, or reduced in future years, then the fee should reflect such changes.
Amendment to Chapter 24.15
As indicated above, the current Green Building Fee is codified. Changing it requires a code amendment. Rather than codify the new fee, the proposed amendment would allow the City Council to modify the fee by resolution, as is typically the practice with other City fees and is typically the case for fees in other jurisdictions throughout the State. The proposed amendment in both clean and strikeout versions is attached.
The advantage of adopting fees by City Council resolution is that it involves a much more streamlined process than an ordinance amendment, which requires two readings and a recommendation from the Planning Commission (since the green building provisions are contained in the Zoning Ordinance), plus thirty days from the second reading before the ordinance is in effect. Not only will the proposed amendment reduce the amount of staff time devoted to report preparation and attendance at the additional hearings, but it will also reduce costs associated with public noticing.
On March 17, 2022, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the proposed amendment by making the following findings:
1. The proposed amendment serves and furthers public necessity and general community welfare by streamlining the process associated with updating fees to support the City’s Green Building Program; and
27.4 2. The proposed amendment serves and furthers good zoning practice by streamlining the process associated with updating fees to support the City’s Green Building Program; and
3. The proposed amendment is in general conformance with the principles, policies, and land use designations set forth in the General Plan as it is consistent with a variety of Policies and Actions in the General Plan, such as NRC 4.1.2, 4.3.2, 7.1, 7.2, and ED 6.2.2 of the General Plan. The Green Building Ordinance is not part of the Local Coastal Program.
For reference, the General Plan policies and actions noted above follow:
NRC4.1.2 Revise the Climate Action Plan to include projected General Plan 2030 growth to the year 2030, and implement municipal, community, and business sections of the Climate Action Plan on energy efficiency and expanded use of renewable energy. NRC4.3.2 Involve the public to identify additional City incentives necessary to improve community energy efficiency upgrades.
NRC7.1 Improve local energy efficiency and conservation. NRC7.2 Promote energy efficiency and innovation as an integral part of economic development.
ED6.2.2 Require commercial and industrial construction and facilities to incorporate green and sustainable building features and operating practices.
FISCAL IMPACT: Increasing the Green Building Fee from 0.0025 to 0.01 of total permit valuation aims to ensure there is no fiscal impact to the City’s general fund for FY 2023 as was the original intent of the Green Building Program. Because the GBF annual revenue is dependent on the quantity and valuation of building projects received, the fee should be reviewed and adjusted regularly given the volatility potential of building permit revenues. Additionally, it is important to note that if the increase is accepted as introduced on April 12, 2022 and formally adopted on April 26, 2022, the new effective date would be 60 days later (around June 27, 2022).
However, if a complete planning or building application is received prior to the effective date, the original Green Building Fee (0.0025 of project valuation, $50,000 cap) applies.
Prepared By:
Viviane Nguyen
Principal Management
Analyst
Submitted By:
Lee Butler
Director of Planning and
Community Development
Approved By:
Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed Green Building Ordinance Amendment, Clean Version Proposed Green Building Ordinance Amendment, Strikeout Version Resolution Amending Unified Master Fee Schedule
March 17, 2022 Planning Commission Action Summary
Green Building Fund Analysis, Fund 108, FY 2005 – FY 2022 Green Building Adopted Budget, FY 2021
Green Building Adopted Budget, FY 2022
Fee Increase Analysis
27.5 Proposed Green Building Ordinance Amendment, Clean Version ORDINANCE NO. 2022-XX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ AMENDING CHAPTER 24.15 OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL CODE TO
SPECIFY THAT THE FEE ASSOCIATED WITH THE GREEN BUILDING EDUCATIONAL
RESOURCE FUND WILL BE ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL BE IT ORDAINED By the City of Santa Cruz as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 24.15 “Green Building Regulations” of the City of Santa Cruz Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
Chapter 24.15 GREEN BUILDING REGULATIONS
24.15.010 through 24.15.070 – no change.
24.15.080 CREATION OF A GREEN BUILDING EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE FUND.
All permits issued by the city of Santa Cruz with the exception of sub-trade permits and permits issued in conjunction with a master permit shall be assessed a fee established by resolution of the City Council. Revenues collected shall be maintained by the finance department in a revolving green building education fund and shall be used only for program management, public educational purposes such as publications and local seminars.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after final adoption.
PASSED FOR PUBLICATION this 12th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
APPROVED: __________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
27.6
PASSED FOR FINAL ADOPTION this __th day of __, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
APPROVED: __________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
This is to certify that the above
and foregoing document is the
original of Ordinance No. 2022-XX
and that it has been published or
posted in accordance with the
Charter of the City of Santa Cruz.
________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
27.7 Proposed Green Building Ordinance Amendment, Strikeout Version ORDINANCE NO. 2022-XX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ AMENDING CHAPTER 24.15 OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL CODE TO
SPECIFY THAT THE FEE ASSOCIATED WITH THE GREEN BUILDING EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE FUND WILL BE ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
BE IT ORDAINED By the City of Santa Cruz as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 24.15 “Green Building Regulations” of the City of Santa Cruz Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
Chapter 24.15 GREEN BUILDING REGULATIONS
24.15.010 through 24.15.070 – no change.
24.15.080 CREATION OF A GREEN BUILDING EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE FUND.
All permits issued by the city of Santa Cruz with the exception of sub-trade permits and permits issued in conjunction with a master permit shall be assessed a fee equal to .0025 times the overall valuation of the project established by resolution of the City Council. Revenues collected shall be maintained by the finance department in a revolving green building education fund and shall be used only for program management, public educational purposes such as publications and local seminars.
27.8 RESOLUTION NO. NS-29,
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ INCREASING
THE GREEN BUILDING EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE FUND
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Cruz finds that green building design, construction and operation can have a significant positive effect on energy and resource efficiency, waste and pollution reduction, and the health and productivity of a building’s occupants over the life of the building; and
WHEREAS, green building design can help promote the environmental sustainability of natural resources and improve the interior environment by introducing recycled-content and materials created with low embodied energy materials in construction, and reducing the energy consumption needs of structures by making use of efficient construction methods; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz adopted the Green Building Regulations and established the Green Building Education Fee in the City Municipal Code section 24.15.080 to support the program management and educational outreach of the Green Building Program; and
WHEREAS, the Green Building Program oversees building permit applications subject to compliance with green building standards for non-residential and residential buildings the includes new construction, alterations, and remodels to promote environmental sustainability of natural resources including incentives for waste reduction, energy efficiency, water conservation, and climate protection; and
WHEREAS, the Green Building Education Fee has not been increased since 2005 and fee is codified as 0.0025 of project valuation and later included a cap on the fee of $50,000, even though program and employee costs continued to climb, resulting in actual and projected funding gaps to cover necessary program costs; and
WHEREAS, the Green Building Education Fee increase is based on the reasonable estimated cost of providing the services for which the fee is levied; and WHEREAS, adopting the Green Building Education Fee by City Council resolution will streamline the process associated with updating fees to support the City’s Green Building Program to serve the public and general community welfare; and
WHEREAS, the Green Building Fee schedule will be adjusted from 0.0025 to 0.0100 times the overall valuation of a project and incorporate said increase into the City Unified Master Fee Schedule with a footnote that annual Consumer Price Index increases do not apply to the fee; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz as follows:
In approving this implementing resolution, the City Council is increasing the Green Building Fee Program charges for new non-residential and residential development to be paid at issuance of
27.9 building permit as written in Exhibit A and is incorporating said fees in the City’s Unified Master Fee Schedule.
The Green Building Fee shall be effective sixty (60) days after final adoption of the ordinance amending Section 24.15.080 that authorizes the fee to be set by resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
APPROVED: __________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
27.10 City of Santa Cruz, Planning & Community Development Department – Building Permit Application Fees
Excerpt from City of Santa Cruz Unified Master Fee Schedule FY 2022 Effective January 1, 2022 per NS-29, 798
APPLICATION/FEE TYPE FEE AMOUNT
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FEES
Green Building Program Management12 0.25% of the overall project valuation, $50, 000 Maximum 1% of the overall project valuation, $50,000 Maximum13
ELECTRICAL
For the issuance of each electrical permit $53.50
$25.00 for the issuance of each supplemental permit for which the original permit has not expired, been cancelled, or finaled.
PLUMBING $53.50
$25.00 for the issuance of each supplemental permit for which the original permit has not expired, been cancelled, or finaled.
MECHANICAL $53.50
$25.00 for the issuance of each supplemental permit for which the original permit has not expired, been cancelled, or finaled.
GRADING PLAN REVIEWS
50 to 100 cubic yards $53.50
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards $80.25
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards $107 for the first 10,000 cubic yards plus $24.50 for each additional $10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards $327.50 for the first 100,000 cubic yards plus $13.25 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 200,001 cubic yards or more $446.75 for the first 200,000 cubic yards plus $7.25 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
GRADING PERMIT FEES
50 to 100 cubic yards $53.50
101 to 1,000 cubic yards $53.50 for the first 100 cubic yards plus $7.25 for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards $208.75 for the first 1,000 cubic yards plus $14.50 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards $339.25 for the first 10,000 cubic yards plus $66.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 100,001 cubic yards or more $933.25 for the first 100,000 cubic yards plus $36.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
INSPECTION AND PLAN CHECK FEES
Inspection outside of normal business hours, per hour
(Minimum charge – one hour)
$130
Reinspection fees assessed under the provisions of Section 305.8 (UAC)
$130
Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated, per hour (Minimum charge – one hour)
$130
Additional plan review required by changes, additions on revision to plans or to plans for which an initial review has been completed (Minimum charge – one hour)
$130
12 Green Building Fund created on 10/25/2005 per Ordinance 2005-29 and updated on April 26, 2022 per Ordinance 2022-XX. Cap set by Resolution NS-27,559 on 6/26/2006, and fee updated by Resolution NS-29 on April 12, 2022. 13 Annual Consumer Price Index increases do not apply to the fee.
RESOLUTION NO. NS-29,XXX
EXHIBIT A
27.11 March 17, 2022 Planning Commission Action Summary
CITY OF SANTA CRUZ
City Hall
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, California 95060
PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
ACTION SUMMARY
March 17, 2022
Call to Order-The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m.
Roll Call-Commissioners Conway, Greenberg, Kennedy, Maxwell, Mesiti-Miller, Schiffrin, and Dawson were present.
Absent w/notification-None.
Statements of Disqualification-Commissioner Schiffrin recused himself from hearing item 2 to avoid the appearance of a conflict due to his service on the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners.
Oral Communications-None.
Consent Public Hearing
1. City-Wide Project No. A22-0001 Green Building Zoning Ordinance Amendment Motion carried to recommend to City Council approval of the proposed amendment to Chapter 24.15 of the Municipal Code (Green Building Regulations) by making the findings referenced in the staff report dated March 11, 2022.
AYES: Conway, Greenberg, Kennedy, Maxwell, Mesiti-Miller, Schiffrin, and Dawson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
DISQUALIFIED: None.
27.12 Public Hearings
2. 415 Natural Bridges Drive Project No. CP21-0059 Lot Line Adjustment, Planned Development Permit, Design Permit, and Coastal Permit to transfer 4,054 square feet of land to/ from APN 003-011-10 and construct a 100% affordable, 20 unit SRO (Single Room Occupancy) project with a variation to allowed uses to allow an SRO use and variations to development standards for building height, side yard setback, and number of required parking spaces on a vacant lot in the R-L/CZ-O/SP-O (Multiple Residence - Low-Density/Coastal Zone Overlay/Shoreline Protection Overlay) zone district. This project involves the removal of four Heritage trees.
Motion carried to recommend approval of the Planned Development Permit, Design Permit, Coastal Permit, and Lot Line Adjustment to City Council based on the environmental determination, findings listed below, and the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit “A” in the staff report dated March 11, 2022.
AYES: Conway, Greenberg, Kennedy, Maxwell, Mesiti-Miller, and Dawson NOES: None
ABSENT: None.
DISQUALIFIED: Commissioner Schiffrin.
Information Items
Subcommittee/Advisory Body Oral Reports
Items Referred to Future Agendas
Adjournment-The meeting adjourned at 7:48 p.m.
27.13 P:\_Public\Division Managers\Budgets\FY2023\05 EXPENSE AND REVENUE REQUESTS\Special Fund Budget Workbook FY23.xlsx2/23/2022 Fund Balance Analysis - Fund 108 Green Building Educational Resource Fund Activity 2301 Inspection Services
FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY21 FY22Adopted Beginning Fund Balance - 29,647 193,450 458,345 454,578 398,349 291,155 238,973 282,531 258,253 252,906 334,024 265,960 279,662 240,075 172,683 127,667 Revenues
Charges for Services(Green Bldg fee) 29,514 187,640 320,951 115,338 94,309 114,516 120,920 185,006 144,350 205,750 284,893 152,478 208,457 205,485 165,732 162,246 125,000 Miscellaneous revenues* 133 4,226 15,376 13,505 4,893 3,103 2,338 1,958 1,954 2,947 2,046 2,631 19,160 4,741 3,102 730 3,133 Total Revenues 29,647 191,865 336,327 128,844 99,202 117,618 123,258 186,964 146,304 208,697 286,939 155,108 227,617 210,226 168,834 162,977 128,133 Expenditures
Personnel Services - 20,073 38,022 112,555 153,811 197,777 141,417 128,982 150,728 202,958 195,237 214,133 201,151 237,839 224,044 196,688 205,000 Services 11,838 11,304
Group Health Admin Chgs** - - - - - - - - 1,210 1,947 1,947 1,947 1,947 2,364 - Medical services - - - - - - - 282 277 282 891 289 577 284 - - - Program services - - - - - - 5,394 8,609 9,068 - - - - - - 2,981 Other Professional & Technical Services - 670 16,180 12,336 210 24,786 22,846 - - - - - - - - - - Travel and meetings - - - - - - - - - 738 - 22 411 - - - - Training - - 2,321 1,303 260 300 270 350 - - - 119 195 - - - - Liability insurance/surety bonds - - - - - - 4,045 4,045 6,530 6,439 6,439 6,439 8,884 8,880 - - - Dues & Memberships - 0 600 650 275 - 250 - - - - 0 0 0 - - - Printing and Binding - outside - 6,246 9,386 3,487 334 909 1,177 331 1,399 - - 92 666 - - - - Supplies - 75 115 125 63 42 - 215 - - - 53 - 133 - -
Other Materials and Services - 1,074 4,848 2,164 417 72 - 808 1,156 1,680 1,308 131 32 447 211 - - Interagency Transfers Out - - - - - 906 - - - - - - - - - - -
Total Expenditures - 28,063 71,432 132,610 155,431 224,813 175,440 143,406 170,582 214,044 205,821 223,172 213,915 249,813 236,226 207,992 207,981 Surplus/Deficit 29,647 163,803 264,895 (3,766) (56,229) (107,195) (52,182) 43,558 (24,278) (5,347) 81,118 (68,064) 13,702 (39,587) (67,393) (45,016) (79,848) Ending Fund Balance 29,647 193,450 458,345 454,578 398,349 291,155 238,973 282,531 258,253 252,906 334,024 265,960 279,662 240,075 172,683 127,667 47,819 Proof to Eden General Ledger 29,647 193,450 458,345 454,578 398,350 291,155 238,973 282,531 258,252 252,906 334,024 Difference - - (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 0 0 0 0
*Miscellaneous revenues are interest on pooled cash (46110, 46620) ** Finance journal entries to chg depts for Group Health Insurance *** Finance journal entries to chg depts for Liability insurance
27.14 Expenditure Balances Page 1 of 1
Criteria: Summarize By = Report,Department,Division,Activity,Object,Account; As Of = 2/23/2022; Period = 0,1..12; Fund = 108; Activity = 2301 Run: 2/23/2022 12:15 PM
Acct Title
Year-To-Date
Ado Budget
Year-To-Date
Adjustments
Year-To-Date
Adj Budget
Year-To-Date
Actual
Year-To-Date
Encumbrances
Bdgt. to Act.
Variance
Pct.
Spent
Department 50 -- Planning and Community Development
Division 74 -- Building & Safety
Activity 2301 -- Building & Safety
Object 51000 -- PERSONNEL SERVICES
51110 Regular full time 189,682.00 0.00 189,682.00 73,458.12 0.00 116,223.88 38.7% 51114 Overtime 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.31 0.00 (7.31) 0.0%
51132 Special vacation pay 0.00 0.00 0.00 291.97 0.00 (291.97) 0.0% 51201 Retirement contribution 12,227.00 0.00 12,227.00 4,999.04 0.00 7,227.96 40.9% 51203 PERS unfunded liability 31,904.00 0.00 31,904.00 12,337.37 0.00 19,566.63 38.7% 51210 Group health insurance 47,567.00 0.00 47,567.00 19,309.63 0.00 28,257.37 40.6% 51212 Group dental insurance 2,816.00 0.00 2,816.00 1,141.89 0.00 1,674.11 40.6% 51213 Vision insurance 416.00 0.00 416.00 168.97 0.00 247.03 40.6% 51214 Medicare insurance 2,706.00 0.00 2,706.00 1,054.49 0.00 1,651.51 39.0% 51215 Employee assistance program 79.00 0.00 79.00 30.35 0.00 48.65 38.4% 51220 Group life insurance 38.00 0.00 38.00 15.42 0.00 22.58 40.6% 51221 Disability insurance 1,397.00 0.00 1,397.00 435.98 0.00 961.02 31.2% 51222 SDI 1,115.00 0.00 1,115.00 639.84 0.00 475.16 57.4% 51230 Unemployment insurance 2,494.00 0.00 2,494.00 959.46 0.00 1,534.54 38.5% 51240 Workers' compensation 3,894.00 0.00 3,894.00 1,665.92 0.00 2,228.08 42.8% Total PERSONNEL SERVICES 296,335.00 0.00 296,335.00 116,515.76 0.00 179,819.24 Object 52000 -- SERVICES
52151 Program services 2,981.00 0.00 2,981.00 0.00 0.00 2,981.00 0.0% 52932 Liability insurance/surety bonds-interna 10,243.00 0.00 10,243.00 0.00 0.00 10,243.00 0.0% Total SERVICES 13,224.00 0.00 13,224.00 0.00 0.00 13,224.00 Total Building & Safety 309,559.00 0.00 309,559.00 116,515.76 0.00 193,043.24 Total Building & Safety 309,559.00 0.00 309,559.00 116,515.76 0.00 193,043.24 Total Planning and Community Development 309,559.00 0.00 309,559.00 116,515.76 0.00 193,043.24 Total 309,559.00 0.00 309,559.00 116,515.76 0.00 193,043.24 Green Building Adopted Budget, FY22
27.15 Expenditure Balances Page 1 of 2
Criteria: Summarize By = Report,Department,Division,Activity,Object,Account; As Of = 6/30/2021; Period = 0,1..12; Fund = 108; Activity = 2301 Run: 2/23/2022 12:15 PM
Acct Title
Year-To-Date
Ado Budget
Year-To-Date
Adjustments
Year-To-Date
Adj Budget
Year-To-Date
Actual
Year-To-Date
Encumbrances
Bdgt. to Act.
Variance
Pct.
Spent
Department 50 -- Planning and Community Development
Division 74 -- Building & Safety
Activity 2301 -- Building & Safety
Object 51000 -- PERSONNEL SERVICES
51110 Regular full time 188,995.00 0.00 188,995.00 116,190.17 0.00 72,804.83 61.5% 51114 Overtime 400.00 0.00 400.00 258.09 0.00 141.91 64.5% 51115 Termination pay 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,723.08 0.00 (5,723.08) 0.0% 51122 Temporary 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 6,000.00 0.0% 51130 Other pay 0.00 0.00 0.00 837.99 0.00 (837.99) 0.0% 51132 Special vacation pay 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,365.98 0.00 (1,365.98) 0.0% 51201 Retirement contribution 11,014.00 0.00 11,014.00 7,972.59 0.00 3,041.41 72.4% 51203 PERS unfunded liability 31,368.00 0.00 31,368.00 18,351.97 0.00 13,016.03 58.5% 51210 Group health insurance 45,457.00 0.00 45,457.00 35,502.41 0.00 9,954.59 78.1% 51212 Group dental insurance 2,531.00 0.00 2,531.00 2,171.64 0.00 359.36 85.8% 51213 Vision insurance 391.00 0.00 391.00 321.33 0.00 69.67 82.2% 51214 Medicare insurance 2,687.00 0.00 2,687.00 1,768.04 0.00 918.96 65.8% 51215 Employee assistance program 79.00 0.00 79.00 60.73 0.00 18.27 76.9% 51220 Group life insurance 40.00 0.00 40.00 28.89 0.00 11.11 72.2% 51221 Disability insurance 1,287.00 0.00 1,287.00 687.68 0.00 599.32 53.4% 51222 SDI 866.00 0.00 866.00 889.03 0.00 (23.03) 102.7% 51230 Unemployment insurance 2,486.00 0.00 2,486.00 1,623.83 0.00 862.17 65.3% 51240 Workers' compensation 4,306.00 0.00 4,306.00 2,934.93 0.00 1,371.07 68.2% Total PERSONNEL SERVICES 297,907.00 0.00 297,907.00 196,688.38 0.00 101,218.62 Object 52000 -- SERVICES
52119 Group Health admin charges - internal 2,420.00 0.00 2,420.00 2,420.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 52151 Program services 2,981.00 0.00 2,981.00 0.00 0.00 2,981.00 0.0% 52199 Other professional & technical services 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.0% 52302 Travel and meetings 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.0% 52304 Training 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.0% 52932 Liability insurance/surety bonds-interna 8,884.00 0.00 8,884.00 8,884.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 52961 Dues and memberships 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.0% 52972 Printing and binding-outside 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.0% Total SERVICES 39,285.00 0.00 39,285.00 11,304.00 0.00 27,981.00 Object 53000 -- SUPPLIES
53102 Office supplies 300.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.0% 53105 Small tools and equipment 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.0% 53106 Books and periodicals 700.00 0.00 700.00 0.00 0.00 700.00 0.0% Green Building Adopted Budget, FY21
27.16 Expenditure Balances Page 2 of 2
Criteria: Summarize By = Report,Department,Division,Activity,Object,Account; As Of = 6/30/2021; Period = 0,1..12; Fund = 108; Activity = 2301 Run: 2/23/2022 12:15 PM
Acct Title
Year-To-Date
Ado Budget
Year-To-Date
Adjustments
Year-To-Date
Adj Budget
Year-To-Date
Actual
Year-To-Date
Encumbrances
Bdgt. to Act.
Variance
Pct.
Spent
Department 50 -- Planning and Community Development
Division 74 -- Building & Safety
Activity 2301 -- Building & Safety
Object 53000 -- SUPPLIES
53108 Safety clothing and equipment 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.0% Total SUPPLIES 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 Object 54000 -- OTHER MATERIALS AND SERVICES
54990 Miscellaneous supplies and services 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.0% Total OTHER MATERIALS AND SERVICES 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 Total Building & Safety 344,192.00 0.00 344,192.00 207,992.38 0.00 136,199.62 Total Building & Safety 344,192.00 0.00 344,192.00 207,992.38 0.00 136,199.62 Total Planning and Community Development 344,192.00 0.00 344,192.00 207,992.38 0.00 136,199.62 Total 344,192.00 0.00 344,192.00 207,992.38 0.00 136,199.62
27.17 City Council: 3/8/22 GREEN BUILDING FEE INCREASE PROPOSAL FUND 108
Position No.
Top Step
As Of
12/25/21
Percent
Benefits
FY22
Adopted
Budget FY23 GF Costs FY24 GF Costs FY25 GF Costs FY26 GF Costs FY27 GF Costs Percent
to 108
108 Costs
FY23 108 Costs FY24
108 Costs
FY25 108 Costs FY26 108 Costs FY27 Cost Changes/Increase Explanation Current Staff as of FY22 All personnel costs increased 5% annually to cover COLA and other employee costs.
Senior Building Inspector (Underfilled) 184-002 $ 50.22 Community Outreach $ 165,043 $ 173,295 $ 181,960 $ 191,058 $200,610.81 $ 210,641 8% $ 13,864 $ 14,557 $ 15,285 $ 16,049 $ 16,851 Increased by 3% Senior Building Inspector 184-004 $ 50.22 58% $ 165,043 $ 173,295 $ 181,960 $ 191,058 $200,610.81 $ 210,641 8% $ 13,864 $ 14,557 $ 15,285 $ 16,049 $ 16,851 Increased by 3% Senior Building Inspector 184-007 $ 50.22 58% $ 165,028 $ 173,279 $ 181,943 $ 191,040 $200,592.43 $ 210,622 8% $ 13,862 $ 14,555 $ 15,283 $ 16,047 $ 16,850 Increased by 3% Supervising Building Inspector 367-001 $ 56.97 58% $ 187,236 $ 196,597.87 $ 206,427.76 $ 216,749.15 $ 227,586.61 $ 238,965.94 8% $ 15,728 $ 16,514 $ 17,340 $ 18,207 $ 19,117 Increased by 3% Green Building Specialist 237-001 $ 38.25 58% $ 125,705 $ 131,990 $ 138,590 $ 145,519 $152,794.97 $ 160,435 90% $ 118,791 $ 124,731 $ 130,967 $ 137,515 $ 144,391 Chief Building Official 711-001 $ 85.34 32% $ 280,456 $ 294,479 $ 309,203 $ 324,663 $340,896.56 $ 357,941 20% $ 58,896 $ 61,841 $ 64,933 $ 68,179 $ 71,588 Deputy Building Official 764-001 $ 68.37 32% $ 224,676 $ 235,910 $ 247,705 $ 260,091 $273,095.14 $ 286,750 30% $ 70,773 $ 74,312 $ 78,027 $ 81,929 $ 86,025 Management Analyst 702-029 $ 41.56 32% $ 136,572 $ 143,401 $ 150,571 $ 158,099 $166,004.44 $ 174,305 10% $ 14,340 $ 15,057 $ 15,810 $ 16,600 $ 17,430 Increased by 5% Supervising Plans Examiner 362-001 $ 59.19 51% $ 194,512 $ 204,238 $ 214,450 $ 225,172 $236,430.74 $ 248,252 20% $ 40,848 $ 42,890 $ 45,034 $ 47,286 $ 49,650 Senior Plans Examiner 277-002 $ 53.37 58% $ 175,399 $ 184,169 $ 193,378 $ 203,046 $213,198.72 $ 223,859 10% $ 18,417 $ 19,338 $ 20,305 $ 21,320 $ 22,386 Increased by 10% Senior Plans Examiner 277-001 $ 53.37 58% $ 175,399 $ 184,169 $ 193,378 $ 203,046 $213,198.72 $ 223,859 10% $ 18,417 $ 19,338 $ 20,305 $ 21,320 $ 22,386 Increased by 10% Total Current Personnel Charged to 108 ######### $ 1,910,654 $ 2,006,187 $ 2,106,496 $ 2,211,821 $ 2,322,412 $ 397,799 $ 417,689 $ 438,573 $ 460,502 $ 483,527 Proposed Staff FY23
Director NEW $ 107 32% 0 $ 294,375.27 $309,094.03 $324,548.73 $340,776.17 $ 357,815 0.50% $ 1,471.88 $ 1,545 $ 1,622.74 $ 1,704 $ 1,789.07 Asst Director NEW $ 85 32% 0 $ 234,305.39 $246,020.65 $258,321.69 $271,237.77 $ 284,800 0.50% $ 1,171.53 $ 1,230 $ 1,291.61 $ 1,356 $ 1,424.00 Principal Management Analyst (Fund/Fee Management) NEW $ 61 32% 0 $ 166,589.28 $174,918.74 $183,664.68 $192,847.92 $ 202,490 5% $ 8,329.46 $ 8,746 $ 9,183 $ 9,642 $ 10,124.52 Administrative Assistant II (Scheduling+Transfers) NEW $ 28 58% 0 $ 92,752.40 $ 97,390.02 $102,259.52 $107,372.49 $ 112,741 5% $ 4,637.62 $ 4,870 $ 5,112.98 $ 5,369 $ 5,637.06 Records Coordinator NEW $ 34 58% 0 $ 112,830.99 $118,472.53 $124,396.16 $130,615.97 $ 137,147 10% ######### $ 11,847 $ 12,440 $ 13,062 $ 13,714.68 Climate Action Manager NEW $ 42 38% $ 120,987.36 $127,036.73 $133,388.56 $140,057.99 $ 147,061 5% $ 6,049.37 $ 6,352 $ 6,669 $ 7,003 $ 7,353.04 Total Proposed Personnel $ 32,943 $ 34,590 $ 36,320 $ 38,136 $ 40,042 Other Personnel
Overtime $ 3,000 $ 3,225 $ 3,467 $ 3,727 $ 4,006 $ 4,307 100% $ 3,225 $ 3,467 $ 3,727 $ 4,006 $ 4,307 Overtime (Building) NEW $ 2,000 $ 2,150 $ 2,311 $ 2,485 $ 2,671 $ 2,871 12% $ 258 $ 277.35 $ 298.15 $ 320.51 $ 344.55 Temporary $ 6,000 $ 6,450 $ 6,934 $ 7,454 $ 8,013 $ 8,614 $ 20,000 $ 20,200 $ 20,402 $ 20,606 $ 20,812 Increased from 6k to 20k based on capacity needs. Cost is top step of green building specialist salary. Added 5% of GF temp staff for retired inspectors also conducting green building work. Year to year Increase of 7.5% to cover employee cost increases
Temporary (Building) NEW $ 46,000 $ 49,450 $ 53,159 $ 57,146 $ 61,432 $ 66,039 12% $ 5,934 $ 6,379 $ 6,857 $ 7,372 $ 7,925 7.5% Year to year Increase for employee costs Total Other Personnel $ 29,417 $ 30,323 $ 31,285 $ 32,305 $ 33,388 Services and Supplies
Group Health (Green Building) $ 47,567 $ 51,202 $ 53,762 $ 56,450 $ 59,273 $ 62,236 100% $ 51,202 $ 53,762 $ 56,450 $ 59,273 $ 62,236 5% year to year increase for increasing employee costs Group Health Insurance (Building GF) NEW $ 230,763 $ 260,061 $ 273,064 $ 286,717 $ 301,053 $ 316,106 5% $ 13,003 $ 13,653 $ 14,336 $ 15,053 $ 15,805 5% year to year increase for increasing employee costs Group Health Insurance (Admin GF) NEW $ 51,745 $ 54,332 $ 57,048 $ 59,901 $ 62,896 $ 66,041 5% $ 2,717 $ 2,852 $ 2,995 $ 3,145 $ 3,302 5% year to year increase for increasing employee costs Engineering Fees - Outside $ 350,000 $ 360,500 $ 371,315 $ 382,454 $ 393,928 $ 405,746 5% $ 18,025 $ 18,565.75 $ 19,122.72 $ 19,696.40 $ 20,287.30 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Other Professional & Technical Services (Building GF) NEW $ 150,000 $ 154,500 $ 159,135 $ 163,909 $ 168,826 $ 173,891 10% $ 15,450 $ 15,913.50 $ 16,390.91 $ 16,882.63 $ 17,389.11 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Program Services $ 2,981 $ 3,070 $ 3,224 $ 3,385 $ 3,554 $ 3,732 100% $ 3,070 $ 3,224 $ 3,385 $ 3,554 $ 3,732 5% year to year increase for increasing employee and CPI costs Other Professional & Technical Services $ 15,000 $ 15,450 $ 15,914 $ 16,391 $ 16,883 $ 17,389 100% $ 15,450 $ 15,914 $ 16,391 $ 16,883 $ 17,389 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Vehicle Lease - Outside (Building GF) NEW $ 18,487 $ 19,411 $ 20,382 $ 21,401 $ 22,471 $ 23,595 25% $ 4,853 $ 5,095 $ 5,350 $ 5,617.77 $ 5,898.65 5% year to year increase to cover employee and CPI costs Travel and Meetings $ 1,500 $ 1,545 $ 1,591 $ 1,639 $ 1,688 $ 1,739 100% $ 1,545 $ 1,591 $ 1,639 $ 1,688 $ 1,739 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Travel and Meetings (Building GF) NEW $ 8,000 $ 8,240 $ 8,487 $ 8,742 $ 9,004 $ 9,274 12% $ 988.80 $ 1,018.46 $ 1,049.02 $ 1,080.49 $ 1,112.90 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Training $ 3,000 $ 3,090 $ 3,183 $ 3,278 $ 3,377 $ 3,478 100% $ 3,090 $ 3,183 $ 3,278 $ 3,377 $ 3,478 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Training (Building GF) NEW $ 7,750 $ 7,983 $ 8,222 $ 8,469 $ 8,723 $ 8,984 12% $ 958 $ 987 $ 1,016 $ 1,047 $ 1,078 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Telecommunications (Building GF) NEW $ 4,680 $ 4,820 $ 4,965 $ 5,114 $ 5,267 $ 5,425 12% $ 578 $ 596 $ 614 $ 632 $ 651 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Liability Insurance/surety bonds - internal $ 10,243 $ 10,550 $ 10,867 $ 11,193 $ 11,529 $ 11,874 100% $ 10,550 $ 10,867 $ 11,193 $ 11,529 $ 11,874.44 10% year to year costs covers increase liability Liability Insurance/Surety Bond-internal (BD) NEW $ 30,728 $ 33,801 $ 37,181 $ 40,899 $ 44,989 $ 49,488 5% $ 1,690 $ 1,859 $ 2,045 $ 2,249 $ 2,474 10% year to year costs covers increase liability Liability Insurance/Surety Bond-internal (admin) NEW $ 31,675 $ 34,843 $ 38,327 $ 42,160 $ 46,376 $ 51,014 5% $ 1,742.15 $ 1,916.36 $ 2,108.00 $ 2,318.80 $ 2,550.68 10% year to year costs covers increase liability Dues and Memberships $ 500 $ 515 $ 530 $ 546 $ 563 $ 580 100% $ 519 $ 530 $ 546 $ 563 $ 580 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Due and Memberships (Building GF) NEW $ 2,000 $ 2,060 $ 2,122 $ 2,185 $ 2,251 $ 2,319 12% $ 247 $ 255 $ 262 $ 270 $ 278 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Printing and Binding Internal (GRN BUILD) $ 5,000 $ 5,150 $ 5,305 $ 5,464 $ 5,628 $ 5,796 100% $ 5,105 $ 5,305 $ 5,464 $ 5,628 $ 5,796 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Printing and Binding Internal (Building GF) NEW $ 600 $ 618 $ 637 $ 656 $ 675 $ 696 12% $ 74.16 $ 76.38 $ 78.68 $ 81.04 $ 83.47 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Printing and Binding External (GB) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Printing and Binding External (Building GF) NEW $ 400 $ 412 $ 424 $ 437 $ 450 $ 464 12% $ 49 $ 51 $ 52 $ 54 $ 56 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Office Supplies $ 300 $ 309 $ 318 $ 328 $ 338 $ 348 100% $ 309 $ 318 $ 328 $ 338 $ 348 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Office Supplies (Building GF) NEW $ 3,900 $ 4,017 $ 4,138 $ 4,262 $ 4,389 $ 4,521 12% $ 482 $ 497 $ 511 $ 527 $ 543 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Small Tools and Equipment $ 500 $ 515 $ 530 $ 546 $ 563 $ 580 100% $ 515 $ 530 $ 546 $ 563 $ 580 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Small Tools and Equipment (Building GF) NEW $ 1,500 $ 1,545 $ 1,591 $ 1,639 $ 1,688 $ 1,739 12% $ 185 $ 191 $ 197 $ 203 $ 209 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Books and Periodicals $ 700 $ 721 $ 743 $ 765 $ 788 $ 811 100% $ 721 $ 743 $ 765 $ 788 $ 811 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Books and Periodicals (Building GF) NEW $ 6,000 $ 6,180 $ 6,365 $ 6,556 $ 6,753 $ 6,956 12% $ 742 $ 764 $ 787 $ 810 $ 835 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Safety Clothing and Equipment $ 500 $ 515 $ 530 $ 546 $ 563 $ 580 100% $ 515 $ 530 $ 546 $ 563 $ 580 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Safety Clothing and Equipment (Building GF) NEW $ 2,000 $ 2,060 $ 2,122 $ 2,185 $ 2,251 $ 2,319 12% $ 247 $ 255 $ 262 $ 270 $ 278 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Miscellaneous Supplies and Services $ 5,000 $ 5,150 $ 5,305 $ 5,464 $ 5,628 $ 5,796 100% $ 5,150 $ 5,305 $ 5,464 $ 5,628 $ 5,796 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Miscellaneous Supplies and Services (Building GF) NEW $ 1,000 $ 1,030 $ 1,061 $ 1,093 $ 1,126 $ 1,159 12% $ 124 $ 127 $ 131 $ 135 $ 139 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Total Serviecs and Supplies $ 159,897 $ 166,474 $ 173,303 $ 180,447 $ 187,910 3% year to year increase for CPI adjustment Total GREEN BUILDING, FUND 108, COSTS $ 620,056 $ 649,076 $ 679,481 $ 711,389 $ 744,867
GENERAL FUND (GF) EXPENSES GREEN BUILDING EXPENSES
Increased by 5% year to year to cover COLA and other employee costs GENERAL FUND (GF) EXPENSES GREEN BUILDING EXPENSES (FUND 108) As of FY 22, the Green Building program, Fund 108, has only supported a percent of select Building & Safety staff. However, administrative staff and supply and service needs used by Building staff who support the Green Building Program have not been charged to the Green Building Program. To cover all service and supply needs of the program including administrative costs, office supplies, vehicle needs, and other support services, a percent of existing general fund charges was calculated. This calculated amount (12%) is propposed to be funded by Fund 108 based on number of positions in Building & Safety Division (not including Green Building Specialist) that currenty support the Green Building Program. Ten (10) positions for a total percent total of 1000%. The percent of each of the ten positions currently allocated to Fund 108 was totaled, 115. 115 divided by the full percent possible (1000) and equals 11.5%.
11.5% was rounded to whole percent, so 12% of all current General Fund expenses is being moved to Green Building Fund 108.See See Column B marked "new" to understand charges proposed to move to the Green Building Progra and the percent of that cost allocated to the Green Building Program, Fund 108. COlumns L - P, notated n green, project new Green Building program costs from FY23 - FY27.
27.18 GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY22 YTD 2/21/22
Permit NumberAddress Valuation EXPECTED REVENUE (If
permits are similar to FY22
as of 2-21-22)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE (If
permits are similar to
FY22 as of 2-21-22)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE
(If permits are similar to
FY22 as of 2-21-22)
(.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
290 TOTAL PERMITS (2/21/22) $29,577,019.59 $ 221,828 $ 295,770 $ 369,713 B19-0679 418 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 1,351,728.72 $ 10,138 $ 13,517 $ 16,897 B21-0117 185 WESTVIEW CT 1,134,017.24 $ 8,505 $ 11,340 $ 14,175 B21-0135 125 PLATEAU AVE 879,440.24 $ 6,596 $ 8,794 $ 10,993 B21-0017 105 LONGVIEW DR 879,526.44 $ 6,596 $ 8,795 $ 10,994 B21-0391 121 OXFORD WAY 756,387.86 $ 5,673 $ 7,564 $ 9,455 B21-0192 637 HIGH ST 600,304.18 $ 4,502 $ 6,003 $ 7,504 B21-0082 1130 SOQUEL AVE 160,359.00 $ 1,203 $ 1,604 $ 2,004 B21-0137 345 OXFORD WAY 537,526.44 $ 4,031 $ 5,375 $ 6,719 B21-0102 180 ISBEL DR 535,387.30 $ 4,015 $ 5,354 $ 6,692 B19-0588 2608 MISSION ST A, C, D 455,928.75 $ 3,419 $ 4,559 $ 5,699 B20-0558 116 CURTIS ST 441,467.04 $ 3,311 $ 4,415 $ 5,518 B19-0150 215 BEACH ST 423,192.16 $ 3,174 $ 4,232 $ 5,290 B20-0040 104 RIVER ST 339,625.25 $ 2,547 $ 3,396 $ 4,245 B21-0101 325 VAN NESS AVE 332,248.80 $ 2,492 $ 3,322 $ 4,153 B21-0110 1507 LAUREL ST 331,320.00 $ 2,485 $ 3,313 $ 4,142 B19-0719 222 YOUNGLOVE AVE 316,005.74 $ 2,370 $ 3,160 $ 3,950 B21-0298 161 TRESCONY ST 304,676.04 $ 2,285 $ 3,047 $ 3,808 E21-0328 700 FRONT ST 300,000.00 $ 2,250 $ 3,000 $ 3,750 B20-0504 420 OXFORD WAY 297,634.24 $ 2,232 $ 2,976 $ 3,720 B21-0247 1122 WEST CLIFF DR 294,898.20 $ 2,212 $ 2,949 $ 3,686 B21-0316 706 MODESTO AVE 280,974.54 $ 2,107 $ 2,810 $ 3,512 B21-0334 101 CHURCH ST 278,284.50 $ 2,087 $ 2,783 $ 3,479 B20-0340 122 4TH AVE 256,433.82 $ 1,923 $ 2,564 $ 3,205 B21-0379 139 SCHOOL ST 1-4 244,070.40 $ 1,831 $ 2,441 $ 3,051 B19-0617 117 CARBONERA CT 238,020.12 $ 1,785 $ 2,380 $ 2,975 B21-0091 350 ENCINAL ST 900 235,468.74 $ 1,766 $ 2,355 $ 2,943 B21-0156 410 CALIFORNIA AVE 231,830.16 $ 1,739 $ 2,318 $ 2,898 B21-0159 118 ORTALON CIR 225,170.00 $ 1,689 $ 2,252 $ 2,815 B21-0450 1541 ESCALONA DR 222,948.30 $ 1,672 $ 2,229 $ 2,787 B21-0185 120 MASON ST 222,844.32 $ 1,671 $ 2,228 $ 2,786 B21-0434 1316 LAUREL ST 220,000.00 $ 1,650 $ 2,200 $ 2,750 B21-0372 106 MANOR AVE 217,358.40 $ 1,630 $ 2,174 $ 2,717 B21-0129 340 LA FONDA AVE 214,058.44 $ 1,605 $ 2,141 $ 2,676 B21-0458 341 LEE ST 210,000.00 $ 1,575 $ 2,100 $ 2,625
B21-0206 108 ESTATES DR 192,866.48 $ 1,446 $ 1,929 $ 2,411 B21-0199 212 MARNELL AVE 189,026.64 $ 1,418 $ 1,890 $ 2,363 B21-0274 1103 PROSPECT HTS 189,000.00 $ 1,418 $ 1,890 $ 2,363 B21-0213 113 PLATEAU AVE 187,000.00 $ 1,403 $ 1,870 $ 2,338 B21-0244 510 MODESTO AVE 184,800.00 $ 1,386 $ 1,848 $ 2,310 B20-0079 545 PACIFIC AVE 181,885.98 $ 1,364 $ 1,819 $ 2,274 B21-0479 1509 SEABRIGHT AVE B2 181,829.25 $ 1,364 $ 1,818 $ 2,273 B21-0026 218 SANTA CRUZ ST 181,103.44 $ 1,358 $ 1,811 $ 2,264 B21-0163 434 DUFOUR ST 175,120.00 $ 1,313 $ 1,751 $ 2,189 B21-0253 132 KENNETH ST 172,805.60 $ 1,296 $ 1,728 $ 2,160 B21-0530 2161 DELAWARE AVE A 171,009.50 $ 1,283 $ 1,710 $ 2,138 B20-0442 240 PEYTON ST 166,851.12 $ 1,251 $ 1,669 $ 2,086 B20-0487 215 HUBBARD ST 165,980.80 $ 1,245 $ 1,660 $ 2,075 B21-0023 203 SAN JUAN AVE 163,240.00 $ 1,224 $ 1,632 $ 2,041 B21-0131 105 ALLERTON ST 157,653.00 $ 1,182 $ 1,577 $ 1,971 B21-0195 35 CAMILLE LN 156,970.00 $ 1,177 $ 1,570 $ 1,962 B21-0388 1034 LAURENT ST A 154,967.36 $ 1,162 $ 1,550 $ 1,937 B21-0006 510 PACHECO AVE 154,588.12 $ 1,159 $ 1,546 $ 1,932 B20-0317 619 RIVERSIDE AVE 150,000.00 $ 1,125 $ 1,500 $ 1,875 B21-0174 101 SETON WAY 147,000.00 $ 1,103 $ 1,470 $ 1,838 B21-0327 144 SPRING ST 145,969.00 $ 1,095 $ 1,460 $ 1,825 B21-0468 225 PLATEAU AVE 142,422.32 $ 1,068 $ 1,424 $ 1,780 B20-0553 108 ALHAMBRA AVE 142,162.48 $ 1,066 $ 1,422 $ 1,777 27.19
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY22 YTD 2/21/22
Permit NumberAddress Valuation EXPECTED REVENUE (If
permits are similar to FY22
as of 2-21-22)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE (If
permits are similar to
FY22 as of 2-21-22)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE
(If permits are similar to
FY22 as of 2-21-22)
(.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
290 TOTAL PERMITS (2/21/22) $29,577,019.59 $ 221,828 $ 295,770 $ 369,713 B20-0457 137 WESTMOOR CT 141,240.00 $ 1,059 $ 1,412 $ 1,766 B20-0423 119 PROSPECT CT 140,711.04 $ 1,055 $ 1,407 $ 1,759 B20-0192 145 CALVIN PL 140,662.76 $ 1,055 $ 1,407 $ 1,758 B21-0066 123 PEYTON ST 138,600.00 $ 1,040 $ 1,386 $ 1,733 B21-0256 109 WOODSIDE AVE 136,180.00 $ 1,021 $ 1,362 $ 1,702 B21-0216 217 BERRY ST 1 132,000.00 $ 990 $ 1,320 $ 1,650 B21-0237 180 ISBEL DR 132,000.00 $ 990 $ 1,320 $ 1,650
B21-0262 1214 KING ST A 131,560.00 $ 987 $ 1,316 $ 1,645 B21-0245 120 DUBOIS ST 130,398.60 $ 978 $ 1,304 $ 1,630 B21-0150 121 MYRTLE ST 125,357.12 $ 940 $ 1,254 $ 1,567 B21-0227 408 CENTER ST 124,740.00 $ 936 $ 1,247 $ 1,559 B21-0158 429 VAN NESS AVE A 122,320.00 $ 917 $ 1,223 $ 1,529 B21-0203 135 LIBERTY ST 119,572.36 $ 897 $ 1,196 $ 1,495 B21-0080 410 LA FONDA AVE 117,742.08 $ 883 $ 1,177 $ 1,472 B20-0478 1122 PACIFIC AVE 116,265.60 $ 872 $ 1,163 $ 1,453 B21-0078 326 CALIFORNIA ST BLD 2 114,510.00 $ 859 $ 1,145 $ 1,431 B21-0387 125 ALTA AVE 112,401.28 $ 843 $ 1,124 $ 1,405
B21-0152 1820 MISSION ST 111,740.25 $ 838 $ 1,117 $ 1,397 B21-0268 326 PLATEAU AVE 110,220.00 $ 827 $ 1,102 $ 1,378 B21-0415 1315 WATER ST 109,909.80 $ 824 $ 1,099 $ 1,374 B21-0166 115 HIGHLAND AVE 109,890.00 $ 824 $ 1,099 $ 1,374 B21-0456 314 PACHECO AVE 109,670.00 $ 823 $ 1,097 $ 1,371 B20-0122 254 YOUNGLOVE AVE 106,494.92 $ 799 $ 1,065 $ 1,331 B20-0499 130 SCENIC ST 104,631.60 $ 785 $ 1,046 $ 1,308 B21-0119 125 WENDELL ST 104,000.00 $ 780 $ 1,040 $ 1,300 B21-0395 411 DUFOUR ST 100,650.00 $ 755 $ 1,007 $ 1,258 B21-0242 328 FAIRMOUNT AVE 97,020.00 $ 728 $ 970 $ 1,213 B21-0421 122 ALMENA ST 95,196.64 $ 714 $ 952 $ 1,190
B21-0417 1113 LAUREL ST 91,438.92 $ 686 $ 914 $ 1,143
B21-0309 611 WOODROW AVE 91,159.80 $ 684 $ 912 $ 1,139
B21-0252 210 SAN JUAN AVE 91,000.00 $ 683 $ 910 $ 1,138 B20-0101 124 GLENVIEW ST A 90,479.16 $ 679 $ 905 $ 1,131 B19-0739 144 JESSIE ST 89,991.90 $ 675 $ 900 $ 1,125
B21-0173 115 CORAL ST B 89,854.00 $ 674 $ 899 $ 1,123
B22-0012 710 PACHECO AVE 88,000.00 $ 660 $ 880 $ 1,100
B21-0402 2841 MISSION ST 87,698.00 $ 658 $ 877 $ 1,096
B20-0100 403 GRANT ST 87,041.36 $ 653 $ 870 $ 1,088
B21-0111 523 ARROYO SECO 85,800.00 $ 644 $ 858 $ 1,073
B21-0276 222 OLIVE ST 85,524.96 $ 641 $ 855 $ 1,069
B20-0420 712 ALMAR AVE 85,033.00 $ 638 $ 850 $ 1,063
E21-0149 700 FRONT ST 85,000.00 $ 638 $ 850 $ 1,063
B21-0325 131 LENNOX ST 84,477.60 $ 634 $ 845 $ 1,056
B21-0013 722 SEASIDE ST 83,738.98 $ 628 $ 837 $ 1,047
B21-0336 1411 SEABRIGHT AVE A 83,700.00 $ 628 $ 837 $ 1,046 B21-0144 222 JACKSON ST A 81,890.70 $ 614 $ 819 $ 1,024 B21-0294 707 CALIFORNIA ST 80,080.00 $ 601 $ 801 $ 1,001 B21-0615 698 MEDER ST 80,000.00 $ 600 $ 800 $ 1,000
B21-0328 550 SECOND ST 78,814.00 $ 591 $ 788 $ 985
B20-0397 1820 WEST CLIFF DR 77,249.92 $ 579 $ 772 $ 966 B21-0037 125 SYLVAR ST A 75,731.28 $ 568 $ 757 $ 947
B21-0467 810 PELTON AVE 75,447.76 $ 566 $ 754 $ 943
B21-0410 357 PARK WAY 75,000.00 $ 563 $ 750 $ 938
E21-0356 132 BENITO AVE 75,000.00 $ 563 $ 750 $ 938
B21-0220 124 COLOMA ST 8 74,642.50 $ 560 $ 746 $ 933
B21-0221 124 COLOMA ST 7 74,642.50 $ 560 $ 746 $ 933
B21-0577 505 CAYUGA ST 74,399.82 $ 558 $ 744 $ 930 27.20
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY22 YTD 2/21/22
Permit NumberAddress Valuation EXPECTED REVENUE (If
permits are similar to FY22
as of 2-21-22)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE (If
permits are similar to
FY22 as of 2-21-22)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE
(If permits are similar to
FY22 as of 2-21-22)
(.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
290 TOTAL PERMITS (2/21/22) $29,577,019.59 $ 221,828 $ 295,770 $ 369,713 B21-0217 217 BERRY ST 2 71,500.00 $ 536 $ 715 $ 894
B21-0218 217 BERRY ST 3 71,500.00 $ 536 $ 715 $ 894
B21-0219 217 BERRY ST 4 71,500.00 $ 536 $ 715 $ 894
B21-0466 810 PELTON AVE 70,932.52 $ 532 $ 709 $ 887
B21-0007 111 SURFSIDE AVE 70,620.00 $ 530 $ 706 $ 883
B21-0236 525 PACIFIC AVE 69,687.80 $ 523 $ 697 $ 871
B21-0229 532 WILKES CIR 67,000.00 $ 503 $ 670 $ 838
B21-0189 317 SEABRIGHT AVE 66,797.00 $ 501 $ 668 $ 835
B21-0393 307 OXFORD WAY A 66,721.60 $ 500 $ 667 $ 834
B21-0005 127 SEASIDE ST 65,660.12 $ 492 $ 657 $ 821
B21-0190 124 COLOMA ST 65,205.20 $ 489 $ 652 $ 815
B19-0317 231 MARNELL AVE 64,750.28 $ 486 $ 648 $ 809
B21-0411 911 SOQUEL AVE 64,140.00 $ 481 $ 641 $ 802
B21-0210 155 WENDELL ST 64,029.92 $ 480 $ 640 $ 800
B21-0390 201 QUARRY LN 63,800.00 $ 479 $ 638 $ 798
B21-0618 510 CENTER ST 63,360.00 $ 475 $ 634 $ 792
B21-0285 201 JOHN ST 62,920.00 $ 472 $ 629 $ 787
B21-0086 221 NEVADA ST 62,668.00 $ 470 $ 627 $ 783
B21-0438 120 LINDEN ST 62,590.00 $ 469 $ 626 $ 782
B21-0145 510 MARKET ST A 60,656.00 $ 455 $ 607 $ 758
B21-0270 64 ALTA VISTA DR 60,500.00 $ 454 $ 605 $ 756
B21-0481 714 BROADWAY 60,390.00 $ 453 $ 604 $ 755
B21-0473 542 BELLEVUE ST 60,290.32 $ 452 $ 603 $ 754
B21-0240 427 LA FONDA AVE 59,541.56 $ 447 $ 595 $ 744
B21-0079 328 CALIFORNIA ST BLD 3 58,740.00 $ 441 $ 587 $ 734 B21-0478 64 ALTA VISTA DR 58,422.00 $ 438 $ 584 $ 730
B21-0397 303 WALNUT AVE 57,574.00 $ 432 $ 576 $ 720
B21-0292 134 MERCED AVE 57,200.00 $ 429 $ 572 $ 715
B21-0076 324 CALIFORNIA ST BLD 1 55,770.00 $ 418 $ 558 $ 697 B20-0537 1114 LAUREL ST 55,000.00 $ 413 $ 550 $ 688
B21-0404 105 MOORE CREEK RD 55,000.00 $ 413 $ 550 $ 688 B21-0405 1425 LAURENT ST 55,000.00 $ 413 $ 550 $ 688
B21-0041 408 CENTER ST 55,000.00 $ 413 $ 550 $ 688
B21-0027 227 CHICO AVE 54,120.00 $ 406 $ 541 $ 677
B21-0123 514 OCEAN VIEW AVE 53,900.00 $ 404 $ 539 $ 674 B21-0040 415 PACHECO AVE A 50,041.20 $ 375 $ 500 $ 626
E21-0005 2250 MISSION ST 50,000.00 $ 375 $ 500 $ 625
E21-0036 525 OCEAN ST 50,000.00 $ 375 $ 500 $ 625
B21-0160 221 WINDHAM ST 49,150.84 $ 369 $ 492 $ 614
B21-0451 400 ESMERALDA DR 48,524.80 $ 364 $ 485 $ 607
B21-0590 119 SEABRIGHT AVE 48,070.00 $ 361 $ 481 $ 601
B21-0371 555 BETHANY CURV 47,809.44 $ 359 $ 478 $ 598
B21-0313 115 HALL ST A 46,705.12 $ 350 $ 467 $ 584
E21-0295 1204 MISSION ST 46,000.00 $ 345 $ 460 $ 575
B21-0369 117 LADERA DR 44,880.00 $ 337 $ 449 $ 561
B21-0118 145 RANKIN ST 44,440.00 $ 333 $ 444 $ 556
B20-0279 431 CLINTON ST 41,580.00 $ 312 $ 416 $ 520
E21-0238 401 UPPER PARK RD 39,000.00 $ 293 $ 390 $ 488
B21-0228 108 AVALON ST 36,342.08 $ 273 $ 363 $ 454
B21-0311 636 MARKET ST A 35,938.68 $ 270 $ 359 $ 449
B21-0482 114 BALDWIN ST 35,000.00 $ 263 $ 350 $ 438
B21-0254 345 ALTA AVE 34,453.44 $ 258 $ 345 $ 431
B21-0265 160 HARMONY CT B 34,270.64 $ 257 $ 343 $ 428
B21-0271 126 CENTENNIAL ST 34,100.00 $ 256 $ 341 $ 426
B21-0310 1131 WALK CIR 33,360.80 $ 250 $ 334 $ 417
B21-0519 116 ROCKRIDGE LN 32,010.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 27.21
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY22 YTD 2/21/22
Permit NumberAddress Valuation EXPECTED REVENUE (If
permits are similar to FY22
as of 2-21-22)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE (If
permits are similar to
FY22 as of 2-21-22)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE
(If permits are similar to
FY22 as of 2-21-22)
(.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
290 TOTAL PERMITS (2/21/22) $29,577,019.59 $ 221,828 $ 295,770 $ 369,713 B21-0329 214 UHDEN ST 32,000.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400
B21-0512 111 CARDIFF CT 32,000.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400
B21-0225 404 CALIFORNIA AVE 31,981.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 B21-0526 719 SWIFT ST 61 31,925.00 $ 239 $ 319 $ 399
B20-0454 1036 LAURENT ST 31,900.00 $ 239 $ 319 $ 399
B19-0539 231 MARNELL AVE 31,582.32 $ 237 $ 316 $ 395
B21-0544 103 NORTHROP PL 30,000.00 $ 225 $ 300 $ 375
B21-0406 119 LAGUNA ST 29,370.00 $ 220 $ 294 $ 367
B21-0175 101 SETON WAY 29,000.00 $ 218 $ 290 $ 363
B21-0243 515 PACIFIC AVE 28,967.18 $ 217 $ 290 $ 362
B21-0024 117 PEYTON ST 28,301.04 $ 212 $ 283 $ 354
B21-0238 180 ISBEL DR 27,070.56 $ 203 $ 271 $ 338
B21-0272 125 ROBINSON LN 27,000.00 $ 203 $ 270 $ 338
B21-0428 150 SACRAMENTO AVE 26,840.00 $ 201 $ 268 $ 336 B21-0257 1121 LAUREL ST 26,400.00 $ 198 $ 264 $ 330
B21-0429 209 LINDEN ST 26,400.00 $ 198 $ 264 $ 330
B21-0446 110 ROCKRIDGE LN 26,400.00 $ 198 $ 264 $ 330
B21-0226 423 HIGH ST 25,018.00 $ 188 $ 250 $ 313
B21-0269 400 HIGHLAND AVE 25,000.00 $ 188 $ 250 $ 313
B21-0250 526 SOQUEL AVE 25,000.00 $ 188 $ 250 $ 313
B21-0495 137 SOUTHAMPTON LN A 24,970.00 $ 187 $ 250 $ 312 B21-0261 204 QUARRY LN 24,640.00 $ 185 $ 246 $ 308
B21-0335 931 MISSION ST 24,000.00 $ 180 $ 240 $ 300
B21-0295 422 OXFORD WAY 23,100.00 $ 173 $ 231 $ 289
B21-0491 333 SOQUEL AVE 22,900.00 $ 172 $ 229 $ 286
B21-0266 900 HIGH ST APT 1 22,750.00 $ 171 $ 228 $ 284
B21-0087 221 NEVADA ST 22,182.82 $ 166 $ 222 $ 277
B21-0215 226 MIRA VISTA DR 22,000.00 $ 165 $ 220 $ 275
M21-0051 236 ENCINAL ST 21,707.00 $ 163 $ 217 $ 271
B21-0068 338 WALNUT AVE 21,560.00 $ 162 $ 216 $ 270
B21-0504 142 JAMES ST 21,560.00 $ 162 $ 216 $ 270
B21-0233 231 FAIR AVE 21,450.00 $ 161 $ 215 $ 268
B21-0248 422 GRANT ST 21,285.00 $ 160 $ 213 $ 266
B21-0127 141 VAN NESS AVE 20,460.00 $ 153 $ 205 $ 256
B22-0025 127 SOUTHAMPTON LN B 20,350.00 $ 153 $ 204 $ 254 B21-0070 216 BROADWAY 20,000.00 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250
B21-0546 145 LAGUNA ST 20,000.00 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250
B21-0534 202 CARBONERA DR 19,800.00 $ 149 $ 198 $ 248
B21-0483 1411 SEABRIGHT AVE 19,687.68 $ 148 $ 197 $ 246 B21-0460 304 FORBES ST 19,687.68 $ 148 $ 197 $ 246
B21-0055 201 FRONT ST 1,201,472.03 $ 9,011 $ 12,015 $ 15,018 B21-0418 423 BELLEVUE ST 18,920.00 $ 142 $ 189 $ 237
B21-0122 126 NATIONAL ST 18,700.00 $ 140 $ 187 $ 234
B20-0293 519 ESCALONA DR 17,977.22 $ 135 $ 180 $ 225
B20-0462 124 BROOKSIDE AVE 117,930.00 $ 884 $ 1,179 $ 1,474 B21-0324 202 S BRANCIFORTE AVE 17,820.00 $ 134 $ 178 $ 223 B21-0603 438 ROXAS ST 17,820.00 $ 134 $ 178 $ 223
B21-0241 427 LA FONDA AVE 17,737.50 $ 133 $ 177 $ 222
B21-0263 350 LEE ST 17,548.34 $ 132 $ 175 $ 219
B21-0562 638 ESCALONA DR 17,500.00 $ 131 $ 175 $ 219
B21-0487 117 PARK AVE 17,380.00 $ 130 $ 174 $ 217
B20-0389 310 CAYUGA ST A 17,050.00 $ 128 $ 171 $ 213
B21-0419 325 CHESTNUT ST 16,583.36 $ 124 $ 166 $ 207
B21-0416 227 VISTA BELLA DR 16,500.00 $ 124 $ 165 $ 206 B21-0104 108 HANDLEY ST 15,975.00 $ 120 $ 160 $ 200
E22-0011 841 ALMAR AVE 855 15,758.00 $ 118 $ 158 $ 197 27.22
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY22 YTD 2/21/22
Permit NumberAddress Valuation EXPECTED REVENUE (If
permits are similar to FY22
as of 2-21-22)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE (If
permits are similar to
FY22 as of 2-21-22)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE
(If permits are similar to
FY22 as of 2-21-22)
(.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
290 TOTAL PERMITS (2/21/22) $29,577,019.59 $ 221,828 $ 295,770 $ 369,713 B21-0232 550 SECOND ST 15,000.00 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188
B21-0176 101 SETON WAY 15,000.00 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188
B21-0299 209 WEEKS AVE 15,000.00 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188
B21-0551 103 NORTHROP PL 15,000.00 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188
B21-0616 320 SOQUEL AVE B2 15,000.00 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188
B21-0538 236 SUNSET AVE 14,300.00 $ 107 $ 143 $ 179
B21-0314 822 COLUMBIA ST 13,090.94 $ 98 $ 131 $ 164
B21-0212 260 HIGH ST 111 12,870.00 $ 97 $ 129 $ 161
B22-0030 516 WATER ST 12,000.00 $ 90 $ 120 $ 150
B22-0023 127 SEGRE PL 11,550.00 $ 87 $ 116 $ 144
B21-0401 121 MILES ST 11,000.00 $ 83 $ 110 $ 138
B21-0384 302 RIVERSIDE AVE 10,840.00 $ 81 $ 108 $ 136
B21-0436 1051 MORRISSEY BLVD 10,560.00 $ 79 $ 106 $ 132 B21-0164 1001 RIVER ST 10,000.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
B21-0048 2801 MISSION ST 10,000.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
B21-0505 125 GAULT ST 10,000.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
M21-0121 2841 MISSION ST 10,000.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
B21-0532 543 HIGH ST 10,000.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
B21-0141 407 CALIFORNIA AVE 10,000.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
B21-0385 1747 ESCALONA DR 9,900.00 $ 74 $ 99 $ 124
B21-0488 312 WILKES CIR 9,500.00 $ 71 $ 95 $ 119
B21-0148 102 COALINGA WAY 9,350.00 $ 70 $ 94 $ 117
B21-0513 1735 ESCALONA DR 8,910.00 $ 67 $ 89 $ 111
B21-0273 124 RIVER ST 8,500.00 $ 64 $ 85 $ 106
B21-0425 134 TOWNE TER 8,500.00 $ 64 $ 85 $ 106
B21-0493 525 PACIFIC AVE 8,000.00 $ 60 $ 80 $ 100
B21-0287 145 BEACHVIEW AVE 7,920.00 $ 59 $ 79 $ 99
B21-0432 121 MILES ST 7,687.50 $ 58 $ 77 $ 96
B21-0165 307 LAUREL ST 7,659.00 $ 57 $ 77 $ 96
B21-0582 208 SEABORG PL 7,150.00 $ 54 $ 72 $ 89
B20-0535 127 PLUM ST 7,148.40 $ 54 $ 71 $ 89
B21-0435 222 NEVADA ST 7,040.00 $ 53 $ 70 $ 88
B21-0448 96 GRANDVIEW ST 6,600.00 $ 50 $ 66 $ 83
B20-0461 707 WASHINGTON ST A 6,292.98 $ 47 $ 63 $ 79
B21-0284 521 WOODROW AVE 6,160.00 $ 46 $ 62 $ 77
B20-0363 2218 EAST CLIFF DR 6,126.60 $ 46 $ 61 $ 77
B21-0537 114 CARL AVE 6,000.00 $ 45 $ 60 $ 75
B21-0264 41 GRANDVIEW ST 1602 5,940.00 $ 45 $ 59 $ 74
B21-0540 111 NANNA CT 5,940.00 $ 45 $ 59 $ 74
B21-0112 215 HUBBARD ST 5,646.92 $ 42 $ 56 $ 71
B21-0074 124 FREDERICK ST 5,003.60 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B21-0394 304 CLIFF ST 11 5,000.00 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B21-0398 227 CATHCART ST 5,000.00 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B21-0484 175 WEST CLIFF DR 5,000.00 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B21-0200 304 KING ST 5,000.00 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B22-0016 1124 KING ST 4,013.00 $ 30 $ 40 $ 50
B21-0413 853 GHARKEY ST 3,967.14 $ 30 $ 40 $ 50
B21-0125 335 PACHECO AVE 3,880.56 $ 29 $ 39 $ 49
B21-0177 101 SETON WAY 3,574.00 $ 27 $ 36 $ 45
B20-0360 2218 EAST CLIFF DR 3,500.00 $ 26 $ 35 $ 44
B21-0286 806 OCEAN ST 3,500.00 $ 26 $ 35 $ 44
B21-0367 1550 PACIFIC AVE 3,500.00 $ 26 $ 35 $ 44
B21-0492 1012 1/2 COLUMBIA ST 2,680.50 $ 20 $ 27 $ 34
B21-0439 1812 BAY ST 2,600.00 $ 20 $ 26 $ 33
B21-0563 136 PHELAN CT 2,500.00 $ 19 $ 25 $ 31
B21-0197 405 LEIBRANDT AVE 2,358.84 $ 18 $ 24 $ 29 27.23
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY22 YTD 2/21/22
Permit NumberAddress Valuation EXPECTED REVENUE (If
permits are similar to FY22
as of 2-21-22)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE (If
permits are similar to
FY22 as of 2-21-22)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE
(If permits are similar to
FY22 as of 2-21-22)
(.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
290 TOTAL PERMITS (2/21/22) $29,577,019.59 $ 221,828 $ 295,770 $ 369,713 P21-0057 627 SAN JUAN AVE 2,000.00 $ 15 $ 20 $ 25
B21-0462 327 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE 2,000.00 $ 15 $ 20 $ 25
B21-0430 1017 MISSION ST 2,000.00 $ 15 $ 20 $ 25
B21-0383 141 JESSIE ST 1,929.96 $ 14 $ 19 $ 24
B21-0234 220 SOUTHVIEW TER 1,787.00 $ 13 $ 18 $ 22
B21-0330 226 GRANT ST 1,540.00 $ 12 $ 15 $ 19
B21-0457 310 MAIN ST 1,143.68 $ 9 $ 11 $ 14
B21-0146 121 MYRTLE ST 1,072.20 $ 8 $ 11 $ 13
B21-0422 203 MARKET ST 300.00 $ 2 $ 3 $ 4
27.24 GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY21
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED
REVENUES(If permits
similar to those of FY21)
(.0075x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES(If
permits similar to those of
FY21)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES(If
permits similar to those of
FY21)
(.0125 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
386 TOTAL PERMITS $104,465,986.90 $162,292.78 $ 388,941 $ 501,922 $ 614,902 B20-0433 100 LAUREL ST 59,273,816.88 50,000.00 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 B20-0166 202 PANETTA AVE 3,826,405.24 9,566.01 $ 28,698 $ 38,264 $ 47,830 B20-0344 110 COOPER ST 2,926,660.65 7,316.65 $ 21,950 $ 29,267 $ 36,583 B19-0444 200 HIGH RD 1,101,934.18 2,754.84 $ 8,265 $ 11,019 $ 13,774 B20-0404 448 MAY AVE 962,629.98 2,406.58 $ 7,220 $ 9,626 $ 12,033 B20-0151 2025 SOQUEL AVE 785,000.00 1,962.50 $ 5,888 $ 7,850 $ 9,813 B20-0391 230 GAULT ST 780,791.34 1,951.98 $ 5,856 $ 7,808 $ 9,760 B19-0429 724 DARWIN ST A & B 692,038.28 1,730.10 $ 5,190 $ 6,920 $ 8,650 B19-0430 724 DARWIN ST C & D 679,058.28 1,697.65 $ 5,093 $ 6,791 $ 8,488 B20-0414 114 OLIVE ST 663,929.44 1,659.82 $ 4,979 $ 6,639 $ 8,299 B20-0197 523 OCEAN VIEW AVE 597,189.92 1,492.97 $ 4,479 $ 5,972 $ 7,465 B19-0731 619 SUMNER ST 531,298.28 1,328.25 $ 3,985 $ 5,313 $ 6,641 B20-0273 137 SPRING ST 526,316.24 1,315.79 $ 3,947 $ 5,263 $ 6,579 B19-0734 113 LAURENT ST 457,902.16 1,144.76 $ 3,434 $ 4,579 $ 5,724 B21-0113 149 ALTA AVE 431,667.56 1,079.17 $ 3,238 $ 4,317 $ 5,396 B19-0729 619 SUMNER ST 403,078.20 1,007.70 $ 3,023 $ 4,031 $ 5,038 B19-0730 619 SUMNER ST 403,078.20 1,007.70 $ 3,023 $ 4,031 $ 5,038 B20-0247 133 MISSION ST 200 386,159.75 965.40 $ 2,896 $ 3,862 $ 4,827 B19-0726 207 BERKSHIRE AVE 377,644.52 944.11 $ 2,832 $ 3,776 $ 4,721 B20-0069 335 SOQUEL AVE 368,446.00 921.12 $ 2,763 $ 3,684 $ 4,606 B20-0276 916 SUMNER ST B 366,520.00 916.30 $ 2,749 $ 3,665 $ 4,582 B19-0697 358 FREDERICK ST 350,460.00 876.15 $ 2,628 $ 3,505 $ 4,381 B20-0413 141 TOLEDO ST 339,920.02 849.80 $ 2,549 $ 3,399 $ 4,249 B20-0515 135 VISTA BRANCIFORTE 329,120.00 822.80 $ 2,468 $ 3,291 $ 4,114 B19-0714 116 HARVARD ST 325,297.28 813.24 $ 2,440 $ 3,253 $ 4,066 B20-0146 801 RIVER ST 318,618.62 796.55 $ 2,390 $ 3,186 $ 3,983 B20-0232 148 BLAINE ST 155,175.00 775.88 $ 1,164 $ 1,552 $ 1,940 B20-0272 109 HILLCREST TER 303,164.60 757.91 $ 2,274 $ 3,032 $ 3,790 B19-0749 511 BELLEVUE ST 294,028.00 735.07 $ 2,205 $ 2,940 $ 3,675 B20-0251 1722 KING ST 282,700.32 706.75 $ 2,120 $ 2,827 $ 3,534 B19-0735 684 MEDER ST 278,071.65 695.18 $ 2,086 $ 2,781 $ 3,476 B19-0661 902 HANOVER ST 272,915.30 682.29 $ 2,047 $ 2,729 $ 3,411 B17-0699 715 THIRD ST 269,280.00 673.20 $ 2,020 $ 2,693 $ 3,366 B20-0257 310 NOBEL DR 266,101.98 665.26 $ 1,996 $ 2,661 $ 3,326 B20-0390 705 WOODROW AVE 264,582.36 661.46 $ 1,984 $ 2,646 $ 3,307 B20-0447 231 SURFSIDE AVE 263,770.40 659.43 $ 1,978 $ 2,638 $ 3,297 B20-0529 237 SURFSIDE AVE 256,789.72 641.97 $ 1,926 $ 2,568 $ 3,210 B20-0290 1141 N BRANCIFORTE AVE 255,860.00 639.65 $ 1,919 $ 2,559 $ 3,198 B20-0386 131 CLINTON ST 254,958.54 637.40 $ 1,912 $ 2,550 $ 3,187 B19-0086 335 GOLF CLUB DR 232,130.94 580.33 $ 1,741 $ 2,321 $ 2,902 B20-0561 227 OCEAN VIEW AVE 225,663.20 564.16 $ 1,692 $ 2,257 $ 2,821 B20-0241 148 BLAINE ST 219,000.00 547.50 $ 1,643 $ 2,190 $ 2,738 B20-0405 507 PARK WAY 217,454.50 543.64 $ 1,631 $ 2,175 $ 2,718 B20-0155 310 OLIVE ST A 217,016.00 542.54 $ 1,628 $ 2,170 $ 2,713 B20-0531 140 FAIRLAND WAY 215,186.20 537.97 $ 1,614 $ 2,152 $ 2,690 B20-0180 108 SYCAMORE ST 210,142.50 525.36 $ 1,576 $ 2,101 $ 2,627 B19-0625 820 PARK WAY A 203,940.00 509.85 $ 1,530 $ 2,039 $ 2,549 B20-0421 120 HEBARD ST 203,390.00 508.48 $ 1,525 $ 2,034 $ 2,542 B19-0693 212 TRESCONY ST 202,874.40 507.19 $ 1,522 $ 2,029 $ 2,536 B21-0073 221 OCEAN ST 209,277.10 502.70 $ 1,570 $ 2,093 $ 2,616 B20-0346 888 GHARKEY ST 200,939.80 502.35 $ 1,507 $ 2,009 $ 2,512 B19-0662 138 GOLF CLUB DR 200,000.00 500.00 $ 1,500 $ 2,000 $ 2,500 B19-0723 147 CAROL AVE 199,355.00 498.39 $ 1,495 $ 1,994 $ 2,492 B20-0305 235 CAYUGA ST 193,032.52 482.58 $ 1,448 $ 1,930 $ 2,413 B20-0265 610 LAURENT ST 192,828.44 482.07 $ 1,446 $ 1,928 $ 2,410 B20-0496 161 FAIRLAND WAY 192,425.56 481.06 $ 1,443 $ 1,924 $ 2,405 B20-0210 504 WOODROW AVE 190,986.78 477.47 $ 1,432 $ 1,910 $ 2,387 B20-0161 132 ACADIA AVE 190,080.00 475.20 $ 1,426 $ 1,901 $ 2,376 B20-0303 370 ENCINAL ST 189,600.00 474.00 $ 1,422 $ 1,896 $ 2,370 B20-0150 902 HANOVER ST A 187,466.18 468.67 $ 1,406 $ 1,875 $ 2,343 B20-0490 329 HIGH ST 183,505.06 458.76 $ 1,376 $ 1,835 $ 2,294 B20-0106 103 DOANE ST 179,152.66 447.88 $ 1,344 $ 1,792 $ 2,239 B20-0408 521 POPLAR AVE 178,209.12 445.52 $ 1,337 $ 1,782 $ 2,228 B20-0102 136 ANDERSON ST 177,980.00 444.95 $ 1,335 $ 1,780 $ 2,225 B20-0466 419 OLIVE ST 177,462.56 443.66 $ 1,331 $ 1,775 $ 2,218 B20-0379 830 KING ST 176,000.00 440.00 $ 1,320 $ 1,760 $ 2,200 B20-0359 121 LADERA DR 176,000.00 440.00 $ 1,320 $ 1,760 $ 2,200 B20-0331 603 SEABRIGHT AVE 175,780.00 439.45 $ 1,318 $ 1,758 $ 2,197 B20-0334 125 DAKE AVE 175,560.00 438.90 $ 1,317 $ 1,756 $ 2,195 B20-0222 147 MASON ST 175,005.90 437.51 $ 1,313 $ 1,750 $ 2,188 B19-0747 124 GRUNEWALD CT 174,810.62 437.03 27.25$ 1,311 $ 1,748 $ 2,185
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY21
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED
REVENUES(If permits
similar to those of FY21)
(.0075x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES(If
permits similar to those of
FY21)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES(If
permits similar to those of
FY21)
(.0125 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
386 TOTAL PERMITS $104,465,986.90 $162,292.78 $ 388,941 $ 501,922 $ 614,902 B21-0061 1031 CAYUGA ST A 171,600.00 429.00 $ 1,287 $ 1,716 $ 2,145 B20-0254 333 ALTA VISTA DR 171,083.76 427.71 $ 1,283 $ 1,711 $ 2,139 B20-0064 924 CAYUGA ST 169,840.00 424.60 $ 1,274 $ 1,698 $ 2,123 B20-0263 332 YOUNGLOVE AVE 168,236.32 420.59 $ 1,262 $ 1,682 $ 2,103 B19-0715 311 PINE ST 166,075.62 415.19 $ 1,246 $ 1,661 $ 2,076 B20-0094 206 JETER ST 165,303.51 413.26 $ 1,240 $ 1,653 $ 2,066 B20-0107 311 DUFOUR ST 164,560.00 411.40 $ 1,234 $ 1,646 $ 2,057 B20-0224 508 SECOND ST 163,272.00 408.18 $ 1,225 $ 1,633 $ 2,041 B21-0116 436 TREVETHAN AVE 162,470.00 406.18 $ 1,219 $ 1,625 $ 2,031 B20-0407 209 OCEAN VIEW AVE 161,799.88 404.50 $ 1,213 $ 1,618 $ 2,022 B20-0356 602 MIRAMAR DR A 161,700.00 404.25 $ 1,213 $ 1,617 $ 2,021 B20-0115 116 KEYSTONE AVE 157,982.46 394.96 $ 1,185 $ 1,580 $ 1,975 B20-0262 410 ALTA VISTA DR 157,098.22 392.75 $ 1,178 $ 1,571 $ 1,964 B20-0190 115 PROSPECT CT 156,874.38 392.19 $ 1,177 $ 1,569 $ 1,961 B20-0467 419 OLIVE ST 154,440.00 386.10 $ 1,158 $ 1,544 $ 1,931 B20-0336 565 WESTERN DR B 150,000.00 375.00 $ 1,125 $ 1,500 $ 1,875 B20-0217 137 SOUTHAMPTON LN C 146,174.96 365.44 $ 1,096 $ 1,462 $ 1,827 B20-0458 220 BERKELEY WAY 144,084.80 360.21 $ 1,081 $ 1,441 $ 1,801 B19-0684 232 CALEDONIA ST 140,596.36 351.49 $ 1,054 $ 1,406 $ 1,757 B21-0015 120 WESTMOOR CT 136,634.84 341.59 $ 1,025 $ 1,366 $ 1,708 B19-0471 168 PLATEAU AVE 136,400.00 341.00 $ 1,023 $ 1,364 $ 1,705 B19-0644 137 SPRING ST 125,400.00 313.50 $ 941 $ 1,254 $ 1,568 B20-0501 715 WINDHAM ST 125,000.00 312.50 $ 938 $ 1,250 $ 1,563 B21-0058 617 LAURENT ST 124,068.52 310.17 $ 931 $ 1,241 $ 1,551 B19-0037 101 FELIX ST 464,000.00 310.00 $ 3,480 $ 4,640 $ 5,800 B19-0593 312 COLUMBIA ST 122,168.10 305.42 $ 916 $ 1,222 $ 1,527 B20-0205 141 JESSIE ST 121,463.64 303.66 $ 911 $ 1,215 $ 1,518 B20-0516 1209 N BRANCIFORTE AVE 121,312.00 303.28 $ 910 $ 1,213 $ 1,516 B20-0148 616 HIGHLAND AVE 121,087.36 302.72 $ 908 $ 1,211 $ 1,514 B19-0721 428 KING ST 119,090.24 297.73 $ 893 $ 1,191 $ 1,489 B20-0448 206 GLOVER ST 117,918.40 294.80 $ 884 $ 1,179 $ 1,474 B20-0383 117 OAK WAY 117,521.00 293.80 $ 881 $ 1,175 $ 1,469 B20-0233 150 BLAINE ST 117,500.00 293.75 $ 881 $ 1,175 $ 1,469 B20-0234 152 BLAINE ST 117,500.00 293.75 $ 881 $ 1,175 $ 1,469 B20-0248 2117 MISSION ST 117,426.50 293.57 $ 881 $ 1,174 $ 1,468 B19-0640 212 LIBERTY ST 117,040.00 292.60 $ 878 $ 1,170 $ 1,463 B20-0187 783 N BRANCIFORTE AVE 116,600.00 291.50 $ 875 $ 1,166 $ 1,458 B20-0289 316 OTIS ST B 115,398.04 288.50 $ 865 $ 1,154 $ 1,442 B20-0220 518 EMELINE AVE 132,000.00 284.90 $ 990 $ 1,320 $ 1,650 B20-0428 205 HAMMOND AVE 113,578.36 283.95 $ 852 $ 1,136 $ 1,420 B20-0375 618 SAN JUAN AVE 112,857.12 282.14 $ 846 $ 1,129 $ 1,411 B20-0301 107 AVALON ST 111,656.35 279.14 $ 837 $ 1,117 $ 1,396 B20-0507 135 CAMINO DEL SOL 110,880.00 277.20 $ 832 $ 1,109 $ 1,386 B20-0348 888 GHARKEY ST 110,000.00 275.00 $ 825 $ 1,100 $ 1,375 B20-0418 104 RENO WAY 110,000.00 275.00 $ 825 $ 1,100 $ 1,375 B20-0333 125 DAKE AVE 109,560.00 273.90 $ 822 $ 1,096 $ 1,370 B20-0551 1402 BAY ST 108,047.30 270.12 $ 810 $ 1,080 $ 1,351 B20-0157 119 WESTMOOR PL 106,941.44 267.35 $ 802 $ 1,069 $ 1,337 B20-0083 91 HAGEMANN CT 105,407.00 263.52 $ 791 $ 1,054 $ 1,318 B20-0341 1206 BAY ST 104,720.00 261.80 $ 785 $ 1,047 $ 1,309 B20-0156 526 BELLEVUE ST 103,933.60 259.83 $ 780 $ 1,039 $ 1,299 B20-0526 438 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 103,933.60 259.83 $ 780 $ 1,039 $ 1,299 B20-0235 154 BLAINE ST 103,000.00 257.50 $ 773 $ 1,030 $ 1,288 B20-0462 124 BROOKSIDE AVE 117,930.00 250.00 $ 884 $ 1,179 $ 1,474 B21-0033 402 INGALLS ST 19 99,963.00 249.91 $ 750 $ 1,000 $ 1,250 B19-0752 236 COULSON AVE 99,000.00 247.50 $ 743 $ 990 $ 1,238 B20-0238 170 BLAINE ST 94,895.00 237.24 $ 712 $ 949 $ 1,186 B21-0038 118 IOWA DR 93,500.00 233.75 $ 701 $ 935 $ 1,169 B20-0512 1511 LAUREL ST 92,444.24 231.11 $ 693 $ 924 $ 1,156 B20-0165 435 LA FONDA AVE A 92,045.48 230.11 $ 690 $ 920 $ 1,151 B20-0110 134 DAKOTA AVE 90,682.56 226.71 $ 680 $ 907 $ 1,134 B19-0366 150 BALDWIN ST A 89,512.20 223.78 $ 671 $ 895 $ 1,119 B20-0231 146 BLAINE ST 88,400.00 221.00 $ 663 $ 884 $ 1,105 B20-0543 224 JOHN ST 87,850.00 219.63 $ 659 $ 879 $ 1,098 B20-0047 1112 EAST CLIFF DR A 87,344.64 218.36 $ 655 $ 873 $ 1,092 B19-0706 317 HIGH ST 83,450.00 208.63 $ 626 $ 835 $ 1,043 B20-0239 170 BLAINE ST 82,995.00 207.49 $ 622 $ 830 $ 1,037 B20-0485 327 JOHN ST 82,280.00 205.70 $ 617 $ 823 $ 1,029 B20-0328 339 GOSS AVE 81,364.80 203.41 $ 610 $ 814 $ 1,017 B20-0212 340 BERKELEY WAY 81,211.68 203.03 $ 609 $ 812 $ 1,015 B19-0088 503 BUENA VISTA AVE B 80,520.00 201.30 27.26$ 604 $ 805 $ 1,007
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY21
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED
REVENUES(If permits
similar to those of FY21)
(.0075x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES(If
permits similar to those of
FY21)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES(If
permits similar to those of
FY21)
(.0125 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
386 TOTAL PERMITS $104,465,986.90 $162,292.78 $ 388,941 $ 501,922 $ 614,902 B20-0280 2200 DELAWARE AVE 80,262.84 200.66 $ 602 $ 803 $ 1,003 B20-0352 132 LAGUNA ST 82,521.48 198.80 $ 619 $ 825 $ 1,032 B20-0092 258 WALK CIR 78,954.24 197.39 $ 592 $ 790 $ 987 B20-0422 260 HIGH ST 78,000.00 195.00 $ 585 $ 780 $ 975 B21-0095 313 CLINTON ST 76,450.00 191.13 $ 573 $ 765 $ 956 B20-0500 222 MIRA VISTA DR 75,460.00 188.65 $ 566 $ 755 $ 943 B19-0744 1100 FAIR AVE B 75,169.20 187.92 $ 564 $ 752 $ 940 B20-0313 82 BLACKBURN ST 111 75,000.00 187.50 $ 563 $ 750 $ 938 B20-0315 84 BLACKBURN ST 100 75,000.00 187.50 $ 563 $ 750 $ 938 B19-0711 215 CALEDONIA ST 74,455.24 186.14 $ 558 $ 745 $ 931 B19-0475 700 WESTERN DR 74,140.00 185.35 $ 556 $ 741 $ 927 B20-0128 421 BAY ST 73,545.40 183.86 $ 552 $ 735 $ 919
B19-0454 300 PIONEER ST 73,258.39 183.15 $ 549 $ 733 $ 916 B21-0032 120 JETER ST 71,060.00 177.65 $ 533 $ 711 $ 888 B21-0133 104 RENO WAY 70,536.60 176.34 $ 529 $ 705 $ 882 B21-0047 160 HARMONY CT A 69,783.12 174.46 $ 523 $ 698 $ 872 B20-0244 217 MISSION ST 69,754.40 174.39 $ 523 $ 698 $ 872 B21-0028 418 SAN JUAN AVE 69,497.52 173.74 $ 521 $ 695 $ 869 B19-0718 225 HIGHLAND AVE A 68,541.28 171.35 $ 514 $ 685 $ 857 B20-0191 620 HIGHLAND AVE 67,469.70 168.67 $ 506 $ 675 $ 843 B20-0377 324 LINDEN ST 67,000.00 167.50 $ 503 $ 670 $ 838 B19-0608 311 VAN NESS AVE 66,873.24 167.18 $ 502 $ 669 $ 836 B20-0199 116 SEASIDE ST 66,791.00 166.98 $ 501 $ 668 $ 835 B21-0035 418 CENTENNIAL ST 66,660.00 166.65 $ 500 $ 667 $ 833 B21-0059 110 COOPER ST FL 3 66,006.20 165.02 $ 495 $ 660 $ 825 B21-0060 110 COOPER ST FL 4 66,006.20 165.02 $ 495 $ 660 $ 825 B19-0544 1611 BAY ST 66,000.00 165.00 $ 495 $ 660 $ 825 B20-0296 1104 KING ST 66,000.00 165.00 $ 495 $ 660 $ 825 B20-0227 803 MORRISSEY BLVD 65,230.00 163.08 $ 489 $ 652 $ 815 B20-0286 236 PEYTON ST 65,152.56 162.88 $ 489 $ 652 $ 814 B19-0672 1642 MISSION ST 65,000.00 162.50 $ 488 $ 650 $ 813 B20-0298 317 LIGHTHOUSE AVE 64,598.64 161.50 $ 484 $ 646 $ 807 B20-0357 813 WINDSOR ST 63,385.52 158.46 $ 475 $ 634 $ 792 B20-0260 824 WESTERN DR 63,250.00 158.13 $ 474 $ 633 $ 791 B20-0154 514 CLIFF ST A-H 62,973.88 157.43 $ 472 $ 630 $ 787 B20-0506 1201 FAIR AVE 61,000.00 152.50 $ 458 $ 610 $ 763 B20-0316 111 DELLVIEW AVE 60,830.00 152.08 $ 456 $ 608 $ 760 B20-0170 253 4TH AVE 60,472.50 151.18 $ 454 $ 605 $ 756 B20-0382 335 SOQUEL AVE 60,000.00 150.00 $ 450 $ 600 $ 750 B20-0314 80 BLACKBURN ST 117 60,000.00 150.00 $ 450 $ 600 $ 750 B21-0044 147 STOCKTON AVE 59,000.00 147.50 $ 443 $ 590 $ 738 B19-0026 1044 ESCALONA DR 58,960.00 147.40 $ 442 $ 590 $ 737 B21-0167 1502 ESCALONA DR 58,515.00 146.29 $ 439 $ 585 $ 731 B20-0169 421 VAN NESS AVE 57,309.60 143.27 $ 430 $ 573 $ 716 B18-0012 1106 N BRANCIFORTE AVE 56,410.08 141.03 $ 423 $ 564 $ 705 B20-0188 101 CHURCH ST 56,256.00 140.64 $ 422 $ 563 $ 703 B20-0508 123 CRESPI CT 55,803.52 139.51 $ 419 $ 558 $ 698 B21-0134 226 ROSS ST 55,660.00 139.15 $ 417 $ 557 $ 696 B19-0624 625 MARNELL AVE 55,290.00 138.23 $ 415 $ 553 $ 691 B19-0710 535 PALM ST 55,231.80 138.08 $ 414 $ 552 $ 690 B20-0093 1007 SEABRIGHT AVE 55,000.00 137.50 $ 413 $ 550 $ 688 B20-0177 134 GREEN ST 55,000.00 137.50 $ 413 $ 550 $ 688 B20-0211 229 ALAMO AVE 54,670.00 136.68 $ 410 $ 547 $ 683 B20-0105 324 MAIN ST 54,438.76 136.10 $ 408 $ 544 $ 680 B20-0311 516 LIBERTY ST 54,120.00 135.30 $ 406 $ 541 $ 677 B20-0209 165 HAGEMANN AVE 53,833.28 134.58 $ 404 $ 538 $ 673 B21-0008 925 FAIR AVE 52,713.42 131.78 $ 395 $ 527 $ 659 B20-0143 200 HARVEY WEST BLVD 52,000.00 130.00 $ 390 $ 520 $ 650 B20-0269 814 CAYUGA ST 51,819.64 129.55 $ 389 $ 518 $ 648 B20-0460 2124 WEST CLIFF DR 51,357.40 128.39 $ 385 $ 514 $ 642 B20-0343 110 COOPER ST 50,741.20 126.85 $ 381 $ 507 $ 634 B20-0513 638 SAN JUAN AVE 63,710.00 126.78 $ 478 $ 637 $ 796 B20-0520 1124 KING ST 50,000.00 125.00 $ 375 $ 500 $ 625 B20-0432 433 EFFEY ST 50,000.00 125.00 $ 375 $ 500 $ 625 B19-0462 223 CHURCH ST 50,000.00 125.00 $ 375 $ 500 $ 625 B21-0085 121 BELVEDERE TER 49,848.44 124.62 $ 374 $ 498 $ 623 B21-0045 133 CENTENNIAL ST 48,910.80 122.28 $ 367 $ 489 $ 611 B20-0096 510 PACHECO AVE 47,630.00 119.08 $ 357 $ 476 $ 595 B20-0236 156 BLAINE ST Units A-D 47,500.00 118.75 $ 356 $ 475 $ 594 B20-0237 158 BLAINE ST Units A-D 47,500.00 118.75 $ 356 $ 475 $ 594 B17-0685 1053 ESCALONA DR 47,008.40 117.52 27.27$ 353 $ 470 $ 588
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY21
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED
REVENUES(If permits
similar to those of FY21)
(.0075x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES(If
permits similar to those of
FY21)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES(If
permits similar to those of
FY21)
(.0125 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
386 TOTAL PERMITS $104,465,986.90 $162,292.78 $ 388,941 $ 501,922 $ 614,902 B20-0001 1050 N BRANCIFORTE AVE 46,860.00 117.15 $ 351 $ 469 $ 586 B20-0488 543 CENTER ST 46,610.00 116.53 $ 350 $ 466 $ 583 B19-0629 1039 CAYUGA ST 45,850.00 114.63 $ 344 $ 459 $ 573 B20-0240 148 BLAINE ST 45,600.00 114.00 $ 342 $ 456 $ 570 B20-0266 140 BAY ST 44,510.00 111.28 $ 334 $ 445 $ 556
B20-0441 125 VAN NESS AVE 44,000.00 110.00 $ 330 $ 440 $ 550 B19-0753 133 WALK CIR 43,672.32 109.18 $ 328 $ 437 $ 546 B20-0144 120 RULOFSON ST 43,450.00 108.63 $ 326 $ 435 $ 543 B20-0245 623 SAN JUAN AVE A 42,900.00 107.25 $ 322 $ 429 $ 536 B19-0492 108 PROSPECT CT 41,200.00 103.00 $ 309 $ 412 $ 515 B20-0395 124 PLATEAU AVE 40,150.00 100.38 $ 301 $ 402 $ 502 B20-0401 142 LIBERTY ST 40,000.00 100.00 $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 B20-0548 134 MERCED AVE 39,710.00 99.28 $ 298 $ 397 $ 496 B20-0544 802 FAIR AVE 39,600.00 99.00 $ 297 $ 396 $ 495 B20-0398 1605 DELAWARE AVE 39,490.00 98.73 $ 296 $ 395 $ 494 B20-0179 105 CLARK AVE 38,920.86 97.30 $ 292 $ 389 $ 487 B20-0358 307 OXFORD WAY 38,670.00 96.68 $ 290 $ 387 $ 483 B21-0194 1011 PELTON AVE 38,500.00 96.25 $ 289 $ 385 $ 481 B20-0121 111 BAYONA DR 38,100.00 95.82 $ 286 $ 381 $ 476 B21-0042 180 CALIFORNIA ST 37,000.00 92.50 $ 278 $ 370 $ 463 B21-0004 402 LAURENT ST 36,914.40 92.29 $ 277 $ 369 $ 461 B21-0106 404 HARBOR DR 36,410.00 91.03 $ 273 $ 364 $ 455 B20-0465 111 CHILVERTON ST 36,393.60 90.98 $ 273 $ 364 $ 455 B20-0310 716 CALIFORNIA ST 35,784.84 89.46 $ 268 $ 358 $ 447 B20-0559 623 SWIFT ST 35,000.00 87.50 $ 263 $ 350 $ 438 B19-0615 2301 MISSION ST G 33,246.00 83.12 $ 249 $ 332 $ 416 B20-0469 405 OREGON ST 33,060.56 82.65 $ 248 $ 331 $ 413 B21-0009 122 BROOK AVE 31,671.66 79.18 $ 238 $ 317 $ 396 B21-0064 410 ESMERALDA DR 31,541.12 78.85 $ 237 $ 315 $ 394 B20-0522 150 BELVEDERE TER 30,800.00 77.00 $ 231 $ 308 $ 385 B20-0536 1715 BAY ST 30,673.18 76.68 $ 230 $ 307 $ 383
B20-0182 212 2ND AVE 30,000.00 75.00 $ 225 $ 300 $ 375
B20-0366 251 CHICO AVE 30,000.00 75.00 $ 225 $ 300 $ 375 B20-0270 2202 MISSION ST 30,000.00 75.00 $ 225 $ 300 $ 375 B20-0271 1319 OCEAN ST 30,000.00 75.00 $ 225 $ 300 $ 375 P20-0083 260 HIGH ST 29,985.00 74.96 $ 225 $ 300 $ 375
B20-0545 143 GETCHELL ST 29,810.00 74.53 $ 224 $ 298 $ 373 B20-0436 1415 SEABRIGHT AVE 28,927.60 72.32 $ 217 $ 289 $ 362 B21-0120 130 CAYUGA ST 28,820.00 72.05 $ 216 $ 288 $ 360 B20-0374 140 FAIRLAND WAY 28,700.00 71.75 $ 215 $ 287 $ 359 B20-0431 114 ACADIA AVE 28,490.00 71.23 $ 214 $ 285 $ 356 B21-0014 144 PLATEAU AVE 28,380.00 70.95 $ 213 $ 284 $ 355 B20-0163 213 FRIDLEY DR 28,270.00 70.68 $ 212 $ 283 $ 353 B20-0292 824 WALNUT AVE 28,138.20 70.35 $ 211 $ 281 $ 352 M20-0098 1110 PACIFIC AVE 27,983.50 69.96 $ 210 $ 280 $ 350 B20-0476 1011 FAIR AVE 27,500.00 68.75 $ 206 $ 275 $ 344 B20-0540 1124 KING ST 27,500.00 68.75 $ 206 $ 275 $ 344 B20-0429 275 CHICO AVE 26,840.00 67.10 $ 201 $ 268 $ 336 B20-0140 520 LINCOLN ST 26,836.02 67.09 $ 201 $ 268 $ 335 B20-0302 903 EAST CLIFF DR 26,400.00 66.00 $ 198 $ 264 $ 330 B19-0018 642 ESCALONA DR 26,090.20 65.23 $ 196 $ 261 $ 326 B20-0542 256 CALVIN PL 26,070.00 65.18 $ 196 $ 261 $ 326 B20-0295 311 YOUNGLOVE AVE 24,310.00 60.78 $ 182 $ 243 $ 304 B20-0044 415 COLUMBIA ST 24,200.00 60.50 $ 182 $ 242 $ 303 B20-0521 944 PROSPECT HTS 23,840.00 59.60 $ 179 $ 238 $ 298 B20-0215 951 WINDSOR ST 22,968.96 57.42 $ 172 $ 230 $ 287 B20-0258 1802 KING ST 22,722.40 56.81 $ 170 $ 227 $ 284 B20-0470 405 OREGON ST 22,353.72 55.88 $ 168 $ 224 $ 279 B20-0274 1508 ESCALONA DR 22,212.41 55.53 $ 167 $ 222 $ 278 B20-0285 290 SWANTON BLVD 22,000.00 55.00 $ 165 $ 220 $ 275 B20-0321 101 HIAWATHA AVE 3 22,000.00 55.00 $ 165 $ 220 $ 275 B20-0104 320 ALAMO AVE 21,780.00 54.45 $ 163 $ 218 $ 272 B20-0351 137 SURFSIDE AVE 21,670.00 54.18 $ 163 $ 217 $ 271 B20-0410 345 GOSS AVE 21,450.00 53.63 $ 161 $ 215 $ 268 B20-0456 207 KALKAR DR 21,120.00 52.80 $ 158 $ 211 $ 264 B20-0403 210 CARBONERA DR 21,054.88 52.64 $ 158 $ 211 $ 263 B20-0463 626 WALNUT AVE 20,460.00 51.15 $ 153 $ 205 $ 256 B20-0399 1225 LAURENT ST 20,350.00 50.88 $ 153 $ 204 $ 254 B21-0143 1415 SEABRIGHT AVE B 20,350.00 50.88 $ 153 $ 204 $ 254 B20-0557 318 MORRISSEY BLVD 20,020.00 50.05 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250 B20-0278 1129 MISSION ST 20,000.00 50.00 27.28$ 150 $ 200 $ 250
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY21
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED
REVENUES(If permits
similar to those of FY21)
(.0075x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES(If
permits similar to those of
FY21)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES(If
permits similar to those of
FY21)
(.0125 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
386 TOTAL PERMITS $104,465,986.90 $162,292.78 $ 388,941 $ 501,922 $ 614,902 B20-0514 1319 OCEAN ST 20,000.00 50.00 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250 B20-0547 2202 MISSION ST 20,000.00 50.00 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250 B20-0225 1803 KING ST 19,550.96 48.88 $ 147 $ 196 $ 244 B20-0184 503 AVALON ST 19,470.00 48.68 $ 146 $ 195 $ 243 B20-0412 400 ESMERALDA DR 19,342.00 48.36 $ 145 $ 193 $ 242 B20-0253 2106 MISSION ST 18,830.00 47.08 $ 141 $ 188 $ 235 B20-0327 111 FREDERICK ST 18,700.00 46.75 $ 140 $ 187 $ 234 B20-0297 55 MUNICIPAL WHARF A, B & C 18,575.37 46.44 $ 139 $ 186 $ 232 B21-0088 401 UPPER PARK RD 18,226.00 45.57 $ 137 $ 182 $ 228 B21-0149 1411 SEABRIGHT AVE B 18,040.00 45.10 $ 135 $ 180 $ 226 B20-0364 233 FELIX ST 18,000.00 45.00 $ 135 $ 180 $ 225 B20-0065 820 SWIFT ST 18,000.00 45.00 $ 135 $ 180 $ 225 B20-0477 125 WESTMOOR DR 18,000.00 45.00 $ 135 $ 180 $ 225 B20-0024 41 GRANDVIEW ST 1101 17,870.00 44.68 $ 134 $ 179 $ 223 B21-0003 540 BELLEVUE ST 17,000.00 42.50 $ 128 $ 170 $ 213 B20-0451 402 INGALLS ST 17,738.20 42.43 $ 133 $ 177 $ 222 B20-0283 350 MISSION ST 16,164.96 40.41 $ 121 $ 162 $ 202 B20-0055 2611 MISSION ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B20-0168 2611 MISSION ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B20-0430 248 1ST AVE 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188
B20-0159 555 SOQUEL AVE 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B20-0384 701 BEACH ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B20-0256 318 PLYMOUTH ST 14,850.00 37.13 $ 111 $ 149 $ 186 B20-0329 109 LIBERTY ST 14,557.44 36.39 $ 109 $ 146 $ 182 B20-0362 534 BUENA VISTA AVE 14,300.00 35.75 $ 107 $ 143 $ 179 B20-0472 349 LEE ST 14,260.26 35.65 $ 107 $ 143 $ 178
B20-0126 409 MOTT AVE 14,000.00 35.00 $ 105 $ 140 $ 175 B20-0533 135 DUBOIS ST 14,000.00 35.00 $ 105 $ 140 $ 175 B21-0201 316 HIGH ST 13,673.26 34.18 $ 103 $ 137 $ 171
B20-0510 218 MISSION ST 13,530.00 33.83 $ 101 $ 135 $ 169 B20-0208 115 HIGHLAND AVE 13,200.00 33.00 $ 99 $ 132 $ 165 B21-0019 209 MIRA VISTA DR 12,650.00 31.63 $ 95 $ 127 $ 158 B20-0219 122 TAYLOR ST 12,646.60 31.62 $ 95 $ 126 $ 158 B20-0406 323 CLINTON ST 12,304.80 30.76 $ 92 $ 123 $ 154 B21-0109 231 WALNUT AVE 12,223.08 30.56 $ 92 $ 122 $ 153 B21-0029 409 COLUMBIA ST 12,035.00 30.09 $ 90 $ 120 $ 150 B20-0409 712 ALMAR AVE 12,000.00 30.00 $ 90 $ 120 $ 150 B21-0124 100 ENGLISH DR 11,550.00 28.88 $ 87 $ 116 $ 144 B20-0546 916 WINDSOR ST 11,472.54 28.68 $ 86 $ 115 $ 143 B20-0181 140 SWIFT ST 10,890.00 27.23 $ 82 $ 109 $ 136
B20-0528 110 PALO VERDE TER 10,560.00 26.40 $ 79 $ 106 $ 132 B20-0189 138 MERCED AVE 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B20-0380 1024 WATER ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B20-0185 1232 MISSION ST 9,837.00 24.59 $ 74 $ 98 $ 123 B20-0193 234 FAIRMOUNT AVE 9,790.00 24.48 $ 73 $ 98 $ 122 B20-0339 534 BUENA VISTA AVE 9,445.72 23.61 $ 71 $ 94 $ 118 D20-0029 1206 BAY ST 9,296.96 23.24 $ 70 $ 93 $ 116
B20-0218 533 ISBEL DR 8,800.00 22.00 $ 66 $ 88 $ 110
B20-0479 550 WATER ST F4 8,617.50 21.54 $ 65 $ 86 $ 108 B20-0133 706 PELTON AVE 8,577.60 21.44 $ 64 $ 86 $ 107
B20-0392 1011 FAIR AVE 11,800.00 21.25 $ 89 $ 118 $ 148 B21-0162 250 MEADOW RD 8,500.00 21.25 $ 64 $ 85 $ 106
B20-0481 699 NOBEL DR 4,145.00 20.72 $ 31 $ 41 $ 52
B20-0355 254 ALTA VISTA DR 8,159.00 20.40 $ 61 $ 82 $ 102 B20-0066 345 LEE ST 8,140.00 20.35 $ 61 $ 81 $ 102
B21-0067 145 VAN NESS AVE 8,082.66 20.21 $ 61 $ 81 $ 101 B20-0388 2210 WEST CLIFF DR 18,041.50 20.10 $ 135 $ 180 $ 226 B20-0525 201 MARNELL AVE 8,000.00 20.00 $ 60 $ 80 $ 100 B19-0035 130 GLENWOOD AVE 7,920.00 19.80 $ 59 $ 79 $ 99 B19-0736 684 MEDER ST 7,500.00 18.75 $ 56 $ 75 $ 94
B20-0440 115 WALTI ST 7,500.00 18.75 $ 56 $ 75 $ 94
B20-0482 449 ISBEL DR 7,500.00 18.75 $ 56 $ 75 $ 94
P20-0146 1030 RIVER ST COMMON 7,500.00 18.75 $ 56 $ 75 $ 94 B21-0094 124 MAGNOLIA ST 7,150.00 17.88 $ 54 $ 72 $ 89
B20-0365 340 ALTA VISTA DR 7,000.00 17.50 $ 53 $ 70 $ 88 B21-0090 190 WALNUT AVE CMN 7,000.00 17.50 $ 53 $ 70 $ 88 B20-0517 121 OAK WAY 6,930.00 17.33 $ 52 $ 69 $ 87
B20-0186 128 SHELTER LAGOON DR 6,710.00 16.78 $ 50 $ 67 $ 84 B20-0426 200 WEST CLIFF DR 24 6,600.00 16.50 $ 50 $ 66 $ 83 B21-0093 224 COULSON AVE 6,160.00 15.40 $ 46 $ 62 $ 77
B20-0367 520 WEST CLIFF DR 6,000.00 15.00 27.29$ 45 $ 60 $ 75
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY21
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED
REVENUES(If permits
similar to those of FY21)
(.0075x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES(If
permits similar to those of
FY21)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES(If
permits similar to those of
FY21)
(.0125 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
386 TOTAL PERMITS $104,465,986.90 $162,292.78 $ 388,941 $ 501,922 $ 614,902 B21-0052 901 SOQUEL AVE 6,000.00 15.00 $ 45 $ 60 $ 75
B21-0140 944 PROSPECT HTS 5,940.00 14.85 $ 45 $ 59 $ 74 B21-0021 435 BELLEVUE ST 5,500.00 13.75 $ 41 $ 55 $ 69
B21-0179 160 PARK PL 3 5,500.00 13.75 $ 41 $ 55 $ 69
B20-0381 814 WINDSOR ST 5,060.00 12.65 $ 38 $ 51 $ 63
E20-0494 227 BERKELEY WAY 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63 B21-0108 635 ESCALONA DR 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B21-0267 1702 DELAWARE AVE 25,000.00 11.25 $ 188 $ 250 $ 313 B20-0039 432 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 4,375.04 10.94 $ 33 $ 44 $ 55 B20-0523 1232 MISSION ST 4,350.00 10.88 $ 33 $ 44 $ 54
B20-0445 129 VAN NESS AVE 4,101.60 10.25 $ 31 $ 41 $ 51 B20-0046 138 HAGEMANN AVE 4,000.00 10.00 $ 30 $ 40 $ 50 B20-0524 403 ESMERALDA DR 4,000.00 10.00 $ 30 $ 40 $ 50 B20-0393 1339 PACIFIC AVE 4,000.00 10.00 $ 30 $ 40 $ 50 B21-0057 320 SOQUEL AVE B2 3,850.00 9.63 $ 29 $ 39 $ 48 B21-0012 567 ARROYO SECO 3,800.00 9.50 $ 29 $ 38 $ 48
B20-0291 98 FREDERICK ST D 3,502.52 8.76 $ 26 $ 35 $ 44 B20-0449 112 TORREY PINE TER 3,323.82 8.31 $ 25 $ 33 $ 42 B20-0326 342 OCEAN ST 2,871.12 7.18 $ 22 $ 29 $ 36
B20-0505 314 SUMNER ST 2,500.00 6.25 $ 19 $ 25 $ 31
B20-0176 119 HAGEMANN AVE 2,348.64 5.87 $ 18 $ 23 $ 29
E21-0212 115 MESA LN 2,200.00 5.50 $ 17 $ 22 $ 28
B19-0631 1712 WEST CLIFF DR 2,000.00 5.00 $ 15 $ 20 $ 25 B21-0214 229 LAUREL ST 2,000.00 5.00 $ 15 $ 20 $ 25
B20-0294 209 HIGH ST 1,914.08 4.79 $ 14 $ 19 $ 24
B20-0453 336 STANFORD AVE 1,760.00 4.40 $ 13 $ 18 $ 22
B20-0475 831 WATER ST 1,200.00 3.00 $ 9 $ 12 $ 15
B20-0534 134 GLENWOOD AVE 1,100.00 2.75 $ 8 $ 11 $ 14
B20-0438 217 COULSON AVE 1,000.00 2.50 $ 8 $ 10 $ 13
B21-0010 516 SOQUEL AVE 3 750.54 1.88 $ 6 $ 8 $ 9
B20-0495 1129 SOQUEL AVE 650.00 1.63 $ 5 $ 7 $ 8
27.30 GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY20
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation, $50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
369 TOTAL PERMITS $95,450,562.47 $166,162.09 $ 441,485 $ 571,980 $ 702,474 B19-0017 215 BEACH ST 43,252,609.88 50,000.00 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 B19-0112 2200 DELAWARE AVE 1,900,350.25 4,750.88 $ 14,253 $ 19,004 $ 23,754 B19-0313 1201 FAIR AVE 1,475,339.00 3,688.35 $ 11,065 $ 14,753 $ 18,442 B19-0153 189 BEACH ST 1,055,600.00 2,639.00 $ 7,917 $ 10,556 $ 13,195 B16-0186 301 BEACH ST 4,808,086.05 2,504.09 $ 36,061 $ 48,081 $ 60,101 B19-0147 2901 MISSION ST 932,509.25 2,331.27 $ 6,994 $ 9,325 $ 11,656 B19-0045 325 GOLF CLUB DR 843,547.40 2,108.87 $ 6,327 $ 8,435 $ 10,544 B19-0051 335 GOLF CLUB DR 843,547.40 2,108.87 $ 6,327 $ 8,435 $ 10,544 B19-0410 120 GHARKEY ST 709,936.24 1,774.84 $ 5,325 $ 7,099 $ 8,874 B18-0687 500 RIVERSIDE AVE 707,794.48 1,769.49 $ 5,308 $ 7,078 $ 8,847 B19-0682 340 OXFORD WAY 695,257.63 1,738.14 $ 5,214 $ 6,953 $ 8,691 B19-0408 116 GHARKEY ST 676,306.64 1,690.77 $ 5,072 $ 6,763 $ 8,454 B19-0301 226 SURFSIDE AVE 619,333.56 1,548.33 $ 4,645 $ 6,193 $ 7,742 B19-0469 510 ALMAR AVE 567,751.82 1,419.38 $ 4,258 $ 5,678 $ 7,097 B14-0333 131 BIXBY ST 542,780.00 1,356.95 $ 4,071 $ 5,428 $ 6,785 B18-0227 206 PLYMOUTH ST 532,638.66 1,331.60 $ 3,995 $ 5,326 $ 6,658 B19-0257 115 HEBARD ST 529,201.48 1,323.00 $ 3,969 $ 5,292 $ 6,615 B19-0272 169 ALTA AVE 519,745.66 1,299.36 $ 3,898 $ 5,197 $ 6,497 B19-0044 321 GOLF CLUB DR 514,687.12 1,286.72 $ 3,860 $ 5,147 $ 6,434 B19-0049 333 GOLF CLUB DR 514,687.12 1,286.72 $ 3,860 $ 5,147 $ 6,434 B19-0050 331 GOLF CLUB DR 514,687.12 1,286.72 $ 3,860 $ 5,147 $ 6,434 B19-0442 350 ENCINAL ST 400 490,048.50 1,225.12 $ 3,675 $ 4,900 $ 6,126 B19-0659 112 HALL ST 479,181.26 1,197.95 $ 3,594 $ 4,792 $ 5,990 B18-0716 711 PACIFIC AVE 476,784.44 1,191.96 $ 3,576 $ 4,768 $ 5,960 B19-0097 2236 WEST CLIFF DR 467,859.84 1,169.65 $ 3,509 $ 4,679 $ 5,848 B18-0226 202 PLYMOUTH ST 456,923.86 1,142.31 $ 3,427 $ 4,569 $ 5,712 B19-0043 319 GOLF CLUB DR 440,914.02 1,102.29 $ 3,307 $ 4,409 $ 5,511 B19-0046 323 GOLF CLUB DR 440,914.02 1,102.29 $ 3,307 $ 4,409 $ 5,511 B19-0047 329 GOLF CLUB DR 440,914.02 1,102.29 $ 3,307 $ 4,409 $ 5,511 B19-0048 327 GOLF CLUB DR 440,914.02 1,102.29 $ 3,307 $ 4,409 $ 5,511 B18-0228 210 PLYMOUTH ST 439,989.24 1,099.97 $ 3,300 $ 4,400 $ 5,500 B19-0372 437 EFFEY ST 433,718.59 1,084.30 $ 3,253 $ 4,337 $ 5,421 B19-0722 517 HIGH ST 430,305.58 1,075.76 $ 3,227 $ 4,303 $ 5,379 B19-0217 350 ENCINAL ST 700 427,633.00 1,069.08 $ 3,207 $ 4,276 $ 5,345 B19-0473 320 GRANT ST 408,934.64 1,022.34 $ 3,067 $ 4,089 $ 5,112 B19-0424 324 GRANT ST 406,844.16 1,017.11 $ 3,051 $ 4,068 $ 5,086 B20-0112 145 VISTA BRANCIFORTE 371,914.12 929.79 $ 2,789 $ 3,719 $ 4,649 B19-0319 346 ALAMO AVE 355,336.22 888.34 $ 2,665 $ 3,553 $ 4,442 B19-0472 146 HAMMOND AVE 343,860.76 859.65 $ 2,579 $ 3,439 $ 4,298 B19-0037 101 FELIX ST 464,000.00 850.00 $ 3,480 $ 4,640 $ 5,800 B19-0457 112-142 PALO VERDE TER CMN 340,000.00 850.00 $ 2,550 $ 3,400 $ 4,250 B19-0493 200 HIGH RD 323,840.00 809.60 $ 2,429 $ 3,238 $ 4,048 B19-0052 315 GOLF CLUB DR 315,741.62 789.35 $ 2,368 $ 3,157 $ 3,947 B19-0243 424 HARBOR DR 288,808.72 722.02 $ 2,166 $ 2,888 $ 3,610 B19-0357 111 RENO WAY 271,338.68 678.35 $ 2,035 $ 2,713 $ 3,392 B18-0582 232 GLENWOOD AVE 263,780.00 659.45 $ 1,978 $ 2,638 $ 3,297 B19-0555 333 GAULT ST 246,040.60 615.10 $ 1,845 $ 2,460 $ 3,076 B19-0695 1207 PACIFIC AVE 237,916.30 594.79 $ 1,784 $ 2,379 $ 2,974 B19-0381 148 TREVETHAN AVE 234,480.98 586.20 $ 1,759 $ 2,345 $ 2,931 B19-0570 912 CEDAR ST 229,578.00 573.95 $ 1,722 $ 2,296 $ 2,870 B19-0240 1531 PACIFIC AVE 225,504.64 563.76 $ 1,691 $ 2,255 $ 2,819 B19-0525 740 FRONT ST 380 224,916.75 562.29 $ 1,687 $ 2,249 $ 2,811 B19-0542 1775 KING ST A 220,642.52 551.61 $ 1,655 $ 2,206 $ 2,758 B19-0743 232 MAJORS ST 217,360.00 543.40 $ 1,630 $ 2,174 $ 2,717 B19-0309 542 SUMNER ST 209,605.60 524.01 $ 1,572 $ 2,096 $ 2,620 B19-0423 528 WINDHAM ST 207,320.20 518.30 $ 1,555 $ 2,073 $ 2,592 B19-0205 363 WESTERN DR OFC 200,000.00 500.00 $ 1,500 $ 2,000 $ 2,500 B19-0595 1104 KING ST 200,000.00 500.00 $ 1,500 $ 2,000 $ 2,500 B19-0737 129 DARWIN ST A 199,450.44 498.63 $ 1,496 $ 1,995 $ 2,493 B19-0224 212 WAVECREST AVE 195,360.00 488.40 $ 1,465 $ 1,954 $ 2,442 B17-0277 111 DUBOIS ST 193,934.00 484.84 $ 1,455 $ 1,939 $ 2,424 B19-0416 623 NATIONAL ST 193,391.72 483.48 $ 1,450 $ 1,934 $ 2,417 B19-0708 214 PLYMOUTH ST 193,380.00 483.45 $ 1,450 $ 1,934 $ 2,417 B19-0269 934 N BRANCIFORTE AVE 189,891.98 474.73 $ 1,424 $ 1,899 $ 2,374 B19-0331 205 MEADOW RD 187,000.00 467.50 $ 1,403 $ 1,870 $ 2,338 B19-0377 349 WESTERN DR 185,976.00 464.94 $ 1,395 $ 1,860 $ 2,325 B20-0124 314 CHACE ST 185,258.58 463.15 $ 1,389 $ 1,853 $ 2,316 B19-0258 115 HEBARD ST 184,831.20 462.08 $ 1,386 $ 1,848 $ 2,310 B19-0287 373 WESTERN DR 182,300.00 455.75 $ 1,367 $ 1,823 $ 2,279 B19-0378 355 WESTERN DR 182,300.00 455.75 $ 1,367 $ 1,823 $ 2,279 B19-0286 353 WESTERN DR 182,300.00 455.75 $ 1,367 $ 1,823 $ 2,279 B19-0728 257 SHELDON AVE 181,853.20 454.63 $ 1,364 $ 1,819 $ 2,273 B18-0464 327 MARKET ST 177,338.12 443.35 $ 1,330 $ 1,773 $ 2,217 B19-0183 1349 PACIFIC AVE 175,196.40 437.99 $ 1,314 $ 1,752 $ 2,190 B19-0182 120 HEBARD ST 174,900.00 437.25 $ 1,312 $ 1,749 $ 2,186 B17-0285 126 PENGUIN CT 1,487,077.50 422.01 $ 11,153 $ 14,871 $ 18,588 B19-0709 732 RIVERSIDE AVE 166,727.84 416.82 $ 1,250 $ 1,667 $ 2,084 B20-0164 1028 BROADWAY 165,345.44 413.36 $ 27.31 1,240 $ 1,653 $ 2,067
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY20
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation, $50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
369 TOTAL PERMITS $95,450,562.47 $166,162.09 $ 441,485 $ 571,980 $ 702,474 B19-0042 317 GOLF CLUB DR 160,554.62 401.39 $ 1,204 $ 1,606 $ 2,007 B19-0702 118 BROOK AVE 160,160.00 400.40 $ 1,201 $ 1,602 $ 2,002 B18-0648 319 PACHECO AVE 157,447.28 393.62 $ 1,181 $ 1,574 $ 1,968 B19-0324 119 SURFSIDE AVE 156,000.00 390.00 $ 1,170 $ 1,560 $ 1,950 B19-0445 947 DELAWARE AVE 154,550.00 386.38 $ 1,159 $ 1,546 $ 1,932 B19-0562 418 SAN JUAN AVE 154,268.00 385.67 $ 1,157 $ 1,543 $ 1,928 B19-0276 2015 MISSION ST 152,178.62 380.45 $ 1,141 $ 1,522 $ 1,902 B19-0409 116 GHARKEY ST 150,811.20 377.03 $ 1,131 $ 1,508 $ 1,885 B14-0254 936 WINDSOR ST 149,378.08 373.45 $ 1,120 $ 1,494 $ 1,867 B19-0550 108 MONTESANO ST 148,838.00 372.10 $ 1,116 $ 1,488 $ 1,860 B19-0359 442 PALM ST 146,118.49 365.30 $ 1,096 $ 1,461 $ 1,826 B19-0573 312 FAIR AVE 145,240.00 363.10 $ 1,089 $ 1,452 $ 1,816 B19-0411 120 GHARKEY ST 142,728.30 356.82 $ 1,070 $ 1,427 $ 1,784 B19-0322 1734 KING ST 140,770.72 351.93 $ 1,056 $ 1,408 $ 1,760 B18-0036 514 PACHECO AVE A 140,457.12 351.14 $ 1,053 $ 1,405 $ 1,756 B18-0714 333 GETCHELL ST 139,593.46 348.98 $ 1,047 $ 1,396 $ 1,745 B19-0250 145 HAGEMANN AVE 138,265.90 345.66 $ 1,037 $ 1,383 $ 1,728 B18-0502 109 SEABRIGHT AVE 577,202.60 342.65 $ 4,329 $ 5,772 $ 7,215 B19-0285 351 WESTERN DR 136,881.00 342.20 $ 1,027 $ 1,369 $ 1,711 B19-0379 375 WESTERN DR 136,881.00 342.20 $ 1,027 $ 1,369 $ 1,711 B19-0380 377 WESTERN DR 136,881.00 342.20 $ 1,027 $ 1,369 $ 1,711 B19-0705 230 SEAVIEW AVE 135,660.56 339.15 $ 1,017 $ 1,357 $ 1,696 B18-0677 125 WALK CIR 135,190.00 337.98 $ 1,014 $ 1,352 $ 1,690 B18-0215 140 FAIRMOUNT AVE 117,007.20 334.37 $ 878 $ 1,170 $ 1,463 B18-0466 216 DAKOTA AVE 133,222.32 333.06 $ 999 $ 1,332 $ 1,665 B19-0461 154 NATIONAL ST 129,045.64 322.61 $ 968 $ 1,290 $ 1,613 B19-0587 119 MADRONE ST 127,826.25 319.57 $ 959 $ 1,278 $ 1,598 B18-0468 130 MILES ST 123,640.00 309.10 $ 927 $ 1,236 $ 1,546 B20-0032 302 PACIFIC AVE 122,123.56 305.31 $ 916 $ 1,221 $ 1,527 B19-0612 203 VISTA BELLA DR 121,000.00 302.50 $ 908 $ 1,210 $ 1,513 B19-0206 363 WESTERN DR OFC 120,860.48 302.15 $ 906 $ 1,209 $ 1,511 B18-0242 311 OLIVE ST 120,421.00 301.05 $ 903 $ 1,204 $ 1,505 B19-0712 912 WESTERN DR 118,288.96 295.72 $ 887 $ 1,183 $ 1,479 B18-0443 105 HAGEMANN AVE 117,671.52 294.18 $ 883 $ 1,177 $ 1,471 B19-0738 322 PINE ST 117,065.50 292.66 $ 878 $ 1,171 $ 1,463 B19-0316 527 SUMNER ST 115,940.00 289.85 $ 870 $ 1,159 $ 1,449 B19-0486 125 MARNELL AVE 115,152.00 287.88 $ 864 $ 1,152 $ 1,439 B19-0564 654 SPRING ST 114,655.40 286.64 $ 860 $ 1,147 $ 1,433 B19-0223 300 THIRD ST 114,584.00 286.46 $ 859 $ 1,146 $ 1,432 B19-0620 1240 BAY ST 113,915.22 284.79 $ 854 $ 1,139 $ 1,424 B19-0610 345 ENCINAL ST 113,910.30 284.78 $ 854 $ 1,139 $ 1,424 B20-0026 430 CHILVERTON ST 112,640.00 281.60 $ 845 $ 1,126 $ 1,408 B19-0482 539 HIGHLAND AVE 112,310.00 280.78 $ 842 $ 1,123 $ 1,404 B19-0271 123 BRONSON ST 111,098.64 277.75 $ 833 $ 1,111 $ 1,389 B19-0720 118 PRINCETON ST 110,880.00 277.20 $ 832 $ 1,109 $ 1,386 B20-0098 1708 OCEAN ST 110,000.00 275.00 $ 825 $ 1,100 $ 1,375 B19-0598 101 MOORE ST 107,868.30 269.67 $ 809 $ 1,079 $ 1,348 B19-0350 131 LIBERTY ST 107,800.00 269.50 $ 809 $ 1,078 $ 1,348 B19-0435 152 BIXBY ST 106,815.56 267.04 $ 801 $ 1,068 $ 1,335 B19-0391 137 MILES ST A 102,485.88 256.21 $ 769 $ 1,025 $ 1,281 B19-0434 122 BRADLEY DR B 101,024.48 252.56 $ 758 $ 1,010 $ 1,263 B18-0631 319 PROSPECT HTS 100,640.06 251.60 $ 755 $ 1,006 $ 1,258 B19-0580 126 LIGHTHOUSE AVE 100,585.32 251.46 $ 754 $ 1,006 $ 1,257 B18-0590 230 3RD AVE 100,245.68 250.61 $ 752 $ 1,002 $ 1,253 B19-0365 914 MISSION ST 100,000.00 250.00 $ 750 $ 1,000 $ 1,250 B19-0417 135 BIXBY ST 99,000.00 247.50 $ 743 $ 990 $ 1,238 B19-0389 1735 DELAWARE AVE 98,340.00 245.85 $ 738 $ 983 $ 1,229 B18-0706 203 AUBURN AVE 97,318.22 243.30 $ 730 $ 973 $ 1,216 B19-0680 221 NORTHROP PL 95,260.00 238.15 $ 714 $ 953 $ 1,191 B19-0326 721 RIVERSIDE AVE A 93,610.00 234.03 $ 702 $ 936 $ 1,170 B19-0538 904 MISSION ST 93,547.75 233.87 $ 702 $ 935 $ 1,169 B19-0314 120 PHELAN CT 91,977.92 229.94 $ 690 $ 920 $ 1,150 B19-0637 2161 DELAWARE AVE A 91,920.00 229.80 $ 689 $ 919 $ 1,149 B19-0582 117 FERN ST 91,249.75 228.12 $ 684 $ 912 $ 1,141 B18-0684 2126 SOQUEL AVE 90,934.80 227.34 $ 682 $ 909 $ 1,137 B19-0581 244 TREVETHAN AVE 89,760.00 224.40 $ 673 $ 898 $ 1,122 B19-0508 133 ACADIA AVE 89,210.00 223.03 $ 669 $ 892 $ 1,115 B19-0254 800 SOQUEL AVE 88,377.25 220.94 $ 663 $ 884 $ 1,105 B19-0683 716 CALIFORNIA ST 88,000.00 220.00 $ 660 $ 880 $ 1,100 B19-0368 224 PACHECO AVE 86,879.40 217.20 $ 652 $ 869 $ 1,086 B19-0515 144 PROSPECT CT 86,268.32 215.67 $ 647 $ 863 $ 1,078 B19-0290 166 RANKIN ST 86,130.00 215.33 $ 646 $ 861 $ 1,077 B19-0436 415 RIVER ST B 84,367.36 210.92 $ 633 $ 844 $ 1,055 B19-0546 220 LAGUNA ST A 82,643.80 206.61 $ 620 $ 826 $ 1,033 B20-0099 403 GRANT ST 82,500.00 206.25 $ 619 $ 825 $ 1,031 B19-0215 116 MAJORS ST 104,500.00 200.75 $ 784 $ 1,045 $ 1,306 B19-0268 102 HILLCREST TER 79,750.00 199.38 $ 598 $ 798 $ 997 B19-0741 257 TREVETHAN AVE 79,200.00 198.00 $ 27.32 594 $ 792 $ 990
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY20
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation, $50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
369 TOTAL PERMITS $95,450,562.47 $166,162.09 $ 441,485 $ 571,980 $ 702,474 B19-0517 426 COLUMBIA ST 79,046.48 197.62 $ 593 $ 790 $ 988 B19-0089 711 HIGHLAND AVE 76,890.00 192.23 $ 577 $ 769 $ 961 B19-0302 220 SYLVANIA AVE 76,697.60 191.74 $ 575 $ 767 $ 959 B19-0565 1502 LAUREL ST A 75,516.72 188.79 $ 566 $ 755 $ 944 B19-0356 126 SEAVIEW AVE 75,020.00 187.55 $ 563 $ 750 $ 938 B19-0170 805 FAIR AVE 74,025.09 185.06 $ 555 $ 740 $ 925 B19-0312 213 2ND AVE 73,827.84 184.57 $ 554 $ 738 $ 923 B19-0700 325 CHESTNUT ST 72,388.68 180.97 $ 543 $ 724 $ 905 B19-0713 912 WESTERN DR 72,312.32 180.78 $ 542 $ 723 $ 904 B19-0146 333 GAULT ST 72,132.20 180.33 $ 541 $ 721 $ 902 B19-0459 2424 MISSION ST 70,000.00 175.00 $ 525 $ 700 $ 875 B18-0258 114 NEARY ST 69,602.76 174.01 $ 522 $ 696 $ 870 B19-0280 230 OXFORD WAY 68,004.22 170.01 $ 510 $ 680 $ 850 B18-0042 207 WAVECREST AVE 67,931.38 169.83 $ 509 $ 679 $ 849 B19-0534 304 CENTENNIAL ST A 67,729.36 169.32 $ 508 $ 677 $ 847 B19-0149 320 CONTINENTAL ST 66,721.60 166.80 $ 500 $ 667 $ 834 B19-0369 336 WILKES CIR 66,721.60 166.80 $ 500 $ 667 $ 834 B19-0419 118 ALLERTON ST 66,440.00 166.10 $ 498 $ 664 $ 831 B19-0509 117 RENO WAY 66,000.00 165.00 $ 495 $ 660 $ 825 B19-0561 311 CALEDONIA ST 65,890.00 164.73 $ 494 $ 659 $ 824 B20-0030 137 PALMETTA ST 65,072.74 162.68 $ 488 $ 651 $ 813 B19-0495 145 CENTENNIAL ST 65,000.00 162.50 $ 488 $ 650 $ 813 B19-0358 1025 BAY ST 63,690.00 159.23 $ 478 $ 637 $ 796 B19-0748 381 SOQUEL AVE 62,491.32 156.23 $ 469 $ 625 $ 781 B19-0651 504 KING ST 62,260.00 155.65 $ 467 $ 623 $ 778 B19-0210 206 PACIFIC AVE 61,869.12 154.67 $ 464 $ 619 $ 773 B19-0281 241 SACRAMENTO AVE 60,656.00 151.64 $ 455 $ 607 $ 758 B19-0176 312 BUENA VISTA AVE 60,000.00 150.00 $ 450 $ 600 $ 750 B19-0528 407 LAURENT ST 59,139.60 147.85 $ 444 $ 591 $ 739 B19-0181 139 CAYUGA ST 58,960.00 147.40 $ 442 $ 590 $ 737 B19-0489 203 LEONARD ST 58,520.00 146.30 $ 439 $ 585 $ 732 B19-0541 316 ELM ST 58,414.36 146.04 $ 438 $ 584 $ 730
B19-0626 811 CALIFORNIA ST 57,750.00 144.38 $ 433 $ 578 $ 722 B18-0679 326 YOUNGLOVE AVE 56,846.28 142.12 $ 426 $ 568 $ 711 B19-0618 139 MERCED AVE 57,813.90 141.07 $ 434 $ 578 $ 723 B19-0484 1124 LAUREL ST 56,100.00 140.25 $ 421 $ 561 $ 701 B19-0477 129 VAN NESS AVE 54,742.04 136.86 $ 411 $ 547 $ 684 B20-0130 122 PINE ST 54,362.94 135.91 $ 408 $ 544 $ 680 B19-0670 1209 PACIFIC AVE 54,132.75 135.33 $ 406 $ 541 $ 677 B19-0332 241 CALIFORNIA ST 52,467.44 131.17 $ 394 $ 525 $ 656 B19-0600 114 PEARL ALY 52,000.00 130.00 $ 390 $ 520 $ 650 B20-0145 1738 KING ST 50,656.62 126.64 $ 380 $ 507 $ 633 B19-0548 302 PLATEAU AVE 50,000.00 125.00 $ 375 $ 500 $ 625 B20-0049 116 BROOKWOOD DR 50,000.00 125.00 $ 375 $ 500 $ 625 B19-0553 130 GHARKEY ST 48,828.08 122.07 $ 366 $ 488 $ 610 B19-0616 1505 SOQUEL AVE 47,500.00 118.75 $ 356 $ 475 $ 594 B19-0173 102 WOODROW AVE 46,423.78 116.06 $ 348 $ 464 $ 580 B19-0394 610 PACIFIC AVE 45,675.72 114.19 $ 343 $ 457 $ 571 B20-0050 313 HIGH ST 45,119.00 112.80 $ 338 $ 451 $ 564 B19-0496 131 PRYCE ST 44,990.00 112.48 $ 337 $ 450 $ 562 B19-0725 431 ALTA VISTA DR 43,672.32 109.18 $ 328 $ 437 $ 546 B19-0499 1310 BAY ST 42,307.56 105.77 $ 317 $ 423 $ 529 B19-0650 318 ENCINAL ST 40,000.00 100.00 $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 B19-0516 1046 WEST CLIFF DR 40,000.00 100.00 $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 B20-0123 400 BEACH ST 40,000.00 100.00 $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 B19-0698 108 AVALON ST 38,000.00 95.00 $ 285 $ 380 $ 475 B19-0260 811 PINE ST 37,072.36 92.68 $ 278 $ 371 $ 463
B20-0045 125 OXFORD WAY 36,300.00 90.75 $ 272 $ 363 $ 454 B19-0274 1111 RIVER ST 3 36,002.00 90.01 $ 270 $ 360 $ 450 B19-0448 107 LISA CT 35,860.00 89.65 $ 269 $ 359 $ 448
B19-0607 604 LIGHTHOUSE AVE 35,750.00 89.38 $ 268 $ 358 $ 447 B19-0437 307 LAGUNA ST 71,030.00 88.83 $ 533 $ 710 $ 888 B19-0524 119 SEABRIGHT AVE 35,251.60 88.13 $ 264 $ 353 $ 441 B19-0746 835 RIVERSIDE AVE 34,884.02 87.21 $ 262 $ 349 $ 436 B19-0328 235 SURFSIDE AVE 34,111.64 85.28 $ 256 $ 341 $ 426 B19-0342 350 ENCINAL ST 33,227.20 83.07 $ 249 $ 332 $ 415 B19-0645 719 SWIFT ST 7 31,597.50 78.99 $ 237 $ 316 $ 395 B18-0718 232 PEYTON ST 31,460.00 78.65 $ 236 $ 315 $ 393 B19-0376 105 LOCUST ST 31,023.00 77.56 $ 233 $ 310 $ 388 B18-0543 126 ANITA ST 30,078.40 75.20 $ 226 $ 301 $ 376 B19-0470 510 ALMAR AVE 30,078.40 75.20 $ 226 $ 301 $ 376 B19-0433 130 GETCHELL ST 30,000.00 75.00 $ 225 $ 300 $ 375 B19-0398 322 CHILVERTON ST 29,920.00 74.80 $ 224 $ 299 $ 374 B19-0245 1309 HIGH ST 29,920.00 74.80 $ 224 $ 299 $ 374 B19-0455 439 MORRISSEY BLVD 29,150.00 72.88 $ 219 $ 292 $ 364 B20-0052 217 OCEAN VIEW AVE 28,050.00 70.13 $ 210 $ 281 $ 351 B19-0295 59 S BRANCIFORTE AVE 27,500.00 68.75 $ 206 $ 275 $ 344 B19-0619 503 BUENA VISTA AVE 27,500.00 68.75 $ 27.33 206 $ 275 $ 344
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY20
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation, $50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
369 TOTAL PERMITS $95,450,562.47 $166,162.09 $ 441,485 $ 571,980 $ 702,474 B19-0426 216 CURTIS ST 27,344.00 68.36 $ 205 $ 273 $ 342 B19-0490 603 WOODROW AVE 27,280.00 68.20 $ 205 $ 273 $ 341 B19-0467 321 BROADWAY A1 26,958.80 67.40 $ 202 $ 270 $ 337 B19-0638 533 ISBEL DR 26,950.00 67.38 $ 202 $ 270 $ 337 B19-0623 333 ENCINAL ST 26,750.00 66.88 $ 201 $ 268 $ 334 B19-0451 119 PROSPECT CT 26,400.00 66.00 $ 198 $ 264 $ 330 B20-0036 400 BEACH ST 26,000.00 65.00 $ 195 $ 260 $ 325 B19-0669 880 WEST CLIFF DR 2 25,960.00 64.90 $ 195 $ 260 $ 325 B19-0547 150 FREDERICK ST 24,530.00 61.33 $ 184 $ 245 $ 307 B19-0441 1140 EAST CLIFF DR 24,000.00 60.00 $ 180 $ 240 $ 300 B19-0464 318 SOQUEL AVE 23,027.40 57.57 $ 173 $ 230 $ 288 B19-0327 615 WINDHAM ST 22,291.08 55.73 $ 167 $ 223 $ 279 B19-0341 711 FREDERICK ST 22,000.00 55.00 $ 165 $ 220 $ 275 B19-0727 190 WALNUT AVE 302 22,000.00 55.00 $ 165 $ 220 $ 275 B19-0189 117 HARVARD ST 21,559.60 53.90 $ 162 $ 216 $ 269 B19-0498 246 MARNELL AVE 21,560.00 53.90 $ 162 $ 216 $ 270 B20-0113 404 ESCALONA DR 21,465.04 53.66 $ 161 $ 215 $ 268 B19-0336 933 DELAWARE AVE 21,340.00 53.35 $ 160 $ 213 $ 267 B20-0153 113 SCHOOL ST 20,900.00 52.25 $ 157 $ 209 $ 261 B20-0226 224 WOODS ST 20,000.00 50.00 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250 B20-0111 810 ISBEL CT 19,800.00 49.50 $ 149 $ 198 $ 248 B19-0463 1023 N BRANCIFORTE AVE 18,590.00 46.48 $ 139 $ 186 $ 232 B20-0109 2424 MISSION ST 18,000.00 45.00 $ 135 $ 180 $ 225 B19-0213 320 KEYSTONE AVE 17,600.00 44.00 $ 132 $ 176 $ 220 B19-0649 185 PALO VERDE TER 17,600.00 44.00 $ 132 $ 176 $ 220 B19-0745 125 RENO WAY 16,500.00 41.25 $ 124 $ 165 $ 206 B18-0616 660 NOBEL DR 3D 16,280.00 40.70 $ 122 $ 163 $ 204 B19-0576 117 CAYUGA ST 16,280.00 40.70 $ 122 $ 163 $ 204 B19-0609 314 JESSIE ST 1 16,000.00 40.00 $ 120 $ 160 $ 200 B20-0097 2020 N PACIFIC AVE 16,000.00 40.00 $ 120 $ 160 $ 200 B19-0560 1523 LAUREL ST 15,950.00 39.88 $ 120 $ 160 $ 199 B19-0458 1127 KING ST 15,840.00 39.60 $ 119 $ 158 $ 198 B19-0537 107 PHELAN CT 15,730.00 39.33 $ 118 $ 157 $ 197 B19-0716 149 SCHOOL ST 15,654.12 39.14 $ 117 $ 157 $ 196 B19-0671 911 CAYUGA ST 15,400.00 38.50 $ 116 $ 154 $ 193 B19-0420 2611 MISSION ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B18-0699 701 BEACH ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B19-0635 350 WASHINGTON ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B20-0086 1118 OCEAN ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B19-0220 127 OCEAN ST 3 14,520.00 36.30 $ 109 $ 145 $ 182 B19-0343 1351 HIGH ST 14,442.48 36.11 $ 108 $ 144 $ 181 B19-0578 117 CAYUGA ST A 14,410.00 36.03 $ 108 $ 144 $ 180 B19-0053 335 GOLF CLUB DR 14,082.16 35.21 $ 106 $ 141 $ 176 B19-0438 415 RIVER ST A 14,000.00 35.00 $ 105 $ 140 $ 175 B19-0468 323 BROADWAY A1 13,479.40 33.70 $ 101 $ 135 $ 168 B18-0651 301 VAN NESS AVE 13,247.20 33.12 $ 99 $ 132 $ 166 B20-0082 218 GRANDVIEW ST 13,200.00 33.00 $ 99 $ 132 $ 165 B18-0689 1913 DELAWARE AVE 13,125.12 32.81 $ 98 $ 131 $ 164 B19-0214 1218 BROADWAY 13,116.58 32.79 $ 98 $ 131 $ 164 B18-0448 310 ALTA VISTA DR 12,723.44 31.81 $ 95 $ 127 $ 159 B19-0611 1137 EAST CLIFF DR 12,292.76 30.73 $ 92 $ 123 $ 154 B20-0033 706 MONARCH WAY 11,659.00 29.15 $ 87 $ 117 $ 146 B19-0387 142 KENNAN ST 11,176.86 27.94 $ 84 $ 112 $ 140 B19-0597 75 ALTA VISTA DR 11,000.00 27.50 $ 83 $ 110 $ 138 B19-0397 307 RAYMOND ST 1 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B19-0406 257 SEGRE PL 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
B19-0559 223 JOHN ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
B19-0370 440 FREDERICK ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B19-0556 363 WESTERN DR OFC 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B20-0043 133 CORAL ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
B20-0252 143 MASON ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
B19-0522 665 HIGH ST 9,900.00 24.75 $ 74 $ 99 $ 124
B20-0057 224 JOHN ST 9,680.00 24.20 $ 73 $ 97 $ 121
B19-0453 810 BROADWAY 9,262.50 23.16 $ 69 $ 93 $ 116
B20-0162 200 WEST CLIFF DR 20 9,240.00 23.10 $ 69 $ 92 $ 116 B20-0023 123 CAMPBELL ST 8,800.00 22.00 $ 66 $ 88 $ 110 B19-0584 404 SOQUEL AVE 8,600.00 21.50 $ 65 $ 86 $ 108
B19-0673 229 VAN NESS AVE 8,476.64 21.19 $ 64 $ 85 $ 106 B19-0446 211 TREVETHAN AVE 8,262.00 20.66 $ 62 $ 83 $ 103 B19-0677 2 BERKELEY CT 8,250.00 20.63 $ 62 $ 83 $ 103
B19-0300 115 CEDAR ST 8,203.20 20.51 $ 62 $ 82 $ 103
B19-0478 129 VAN NESS AVE 8,203.20 20.51 $ 62 $ 82 $ 103 B19-0114 349 WESTERN DR 8,000.00 20.00 $ 60 $ 80 $ 100
B19-0115 353 WESTERN DR 8,000.00 20.00 $ 60 $ 80 $ 100
B19-0116 357 WESTERN DR 8,000.00 20.00 $ 60 $ 80 $ 100
B19-0117 359 WESTERN DR 8,000.00 20.00 $ 60 $ 80 $ 100
B19-0118 361 WESTERN DR 8,000.00 20.00 $ 60 $ 80 $ 100
B19-0636 809 ISBEL CT 8,000.00 20.00 $ 27.34 60 $ 80 $ 100
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY20
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation, $50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUES (If
permits similar to FY20)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
369 TOTAL PERMITS $95,450,562.47 $166,162.09 $ 441,485 $ 571,980 $ 702,474 B19-0480 119 MASON ST 8,000.00 20.00 $ 60 $ 80 $ 100
B20-0135 47 MUNICIPAL WHARF 8,000.00 20.00 $ 60 $ 80 $ 100 B19-0465 319 BROADWAY A1 7,862.80 19.66 $ 59 $ 79 $ 98
B19-0346 346 MARKET ST 7,812.18 19.53 $ 59 $ 78 $ 98
B19-0531 41 GRANDVIEW ST 303 7,700.00 19.25 $ 58 $ 77 $ 96 B20-0167 323 LIBERTY ST 7,500.00 18.75 $ 56 $ 75 $ 94
B19-0574 211 CYPRESS PARK 7,480.00 18.70 $ 56 $ 75 $ 94 B19-0219 127 OCEAN ST 2 7,260.00 18.15 $ 54 $ 73 $ 91
B20-0059 105 CLARK AVE 7,000.00 17.50 $ 53 $ 70 $ 88
B19-0452 404 SOQUEL AVE 6,800.00 17.00 $ 51 $ 68 $ 85
B20-0142 911 SOQUEL AVE 6,800.00 17.00 $ 51 $ 68 $ 85
B19-0520 929 WINDSOR ST 6,500.00 16.25 $ 49 $ 65 $ 81
B19-0041 302 VISTA BELLA DR 6,490.00 16.23 $ 49 $ 65 $ 81 B20-0116 116 CRESTVIEW TER 6,253.00 15.63 $ 47 $ 63 $ 78 B19-0460 519 HIGHLAND AVE 6,203.58 15.51 $ 47 $ 62 $ 78 B19-0543 315 GHARKEY ST 6,000.00 15.00 $ 45 $ 60 $ 75
B17-0197 143 SOUTHAMPTON LN C 6,000.00 15.00 $ 45 $ 60 $ 75 B20-0141 335 SOQUEL AVE 6,000.00 15.00 $ 45 $ 60 $ 75
B19-0218 127 OCEAN ST 1 5,500.00 13.75 $ 41 $ 55 $ 69
B20-0017 218 CARDIFF PL 5,500.00 13.75 $ 41 $ 55 $ 69
B19-0589 167 CYPRESS PARK 5,200.00 13.00 $ 39 $ 52 $ 65 B20-0042 824 WESTERN DR 5,170.00 12.93 $ 39 $ 52 $ 65
B19-0399 235 WOODS ST 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B19-0685 1537 PACIFIC AVE 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63 B20-0084 124 PHELAN CT 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B19-0540 707 CAYUGA ST 4,950.00 12.38 $ 37 $ 50 $ 62
B19-0653 1040 RIVER ST 4,700.00 11.75 $ 35 $ 47 $ 59
B18-0425 308 RIVER ST D30 4,500.00 11.25 $ 34 $ 45 $ 56 B20-0038 205 RIVER ST 4,000.00 10.00 $ 30 $ 40 $ 50
B20-0131 1531 PACIFIC AVE 4,000.00 10.00 $ 30 $ 40 $ 50 B19-0592 213 BLACKBURN ST 3,716.96 9.29 $ 28 $ 37 $ 46
B20-0003 1007 SEABRIGHT AVE 3,520.00 8.80 $ 26 $ 35 $ 44 B20-0031 209 MORRISSEY BLVD 3,500.00 8.75 $ 26 $ 35 $ 44 B20-0061 209 MORRISSEY BLVD A 3,500.00 8.75 $ 26 $ 35 $ 44 B19-0687 200 BUTTON ST 58 & 62 3,431.04 8.58 $ 26 $ 34 $ 43 B19-0689 200 BUTTON ST 10 & 14 3,431.04 8.58 $ 26 $ 34 $ 43 B19-0691 200 BUTTON ST 43 & 47 3,431.04 8.58 $ 26 $ 34 $ 43 B19-0692 200 BUTTON ST 116 & 120 3,431.04 8.58 $ 26 $ 34 $ 43 B19-0414 615 LIGHTHOUSE AVE 3,000.00 7.50 $ 23 $ 30 $ 38 B19-0371 1101 PACIFIC AVE B 3,000.00 7.50 $ 23 $ 30 $ 38 B19-0552 228 TRESCONY ST 3,000.00 7.50 $ 23 $ 30 $ 38
B19-0663 215 MAJORS ST 3,000.00 7.50 $ 23 $ 30 $ 38
B19-0606 322 CALIFORNIA ST B 2,750.00 6.88 $ 21 $ 28 $ 34 B19-0488 430 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 2,640.00 6.60 $ 20 $ 26 $ 33 B20-0108 1223 BROADWAY 1 2,573.28 6.43 $ 19 $ 26 $ 32
B19-0646 623 ARROYO SECO 2,500.00 6.25 $ 19 $ 25 $ 31
B19-0654 1030 RIVER ST COMMON 2,500.00 6.25 $ 19 $ 25 $ 31 B20-0062 216 ALTA AVE 2,420.00 6.05 $ 18 $ 24 $ 30
B19-0657 303 WALNUT AVE 2,298.00 5.75 $ 17 $ 23 $ 29
B19-0396 1521 MISSION ST 2,000.00 5.00 $ 15 $ 20 $ 25
B20-0114 713 RIVERSIDE AVE B 2,000.00 5.00 $ 15 $ 20 $ 25 B19-0425 219 ELM ST 1,787.00 4.47 $ 13 $ 18 $ 22
B19-0690 200 BUTTON ST 31 1,715.52 4.29 $ 13 $ 17 $ 21
B19-0400 532 CENTER ST 1,500.00 3.75 $ 11 $ 15 $ 19
B19-0392 765 CEDAR ST 103 1,350.00 3.38 $ 10 $ 14 $ 17
B19-0384 140 INGALLS ST 1,000.00 2.50 $ 8 $ 10 $ 13
B20-0048 149 FRANKLIN ST 770.00 1.93 $ 6 $ 8 $ 10
PERM139 $ - $ - $ -
27.35 GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY19
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (Current Rate .0025x Valuation, $50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED
REVNUES (If permits
were similar to FY19)
(.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
464 Permits $83,916,468.91 $205,988.32 $ 506,100 $ 621,096 $ 726,370 B18-0032 135 DUBOIS ST 16,001,175.52 40,002.94 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 B18-0302 550 SECOND ST 11,347,967.68 28,369.92 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 B17-0594 2424 MISSION ST 9,087,325.00 22,718.31 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 B18-0428 300 PANETTA AVE 5,370,380.40 13,425.95 $ 40,278 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 B18-0667 200 HIGH RD 1,632,352.32 4,080.88 $ 12,243 $ 16,324 $ 20,404 B17-0686 769 N BRANCIFORTE AVE A 897,775.44 2,244.44 $ 6,733 $ 8,978 $ 11,222 B19-0249 1720 WEST CLIFF DR 700,269.48 1,750.67 $ 5,252 $ 7,003 $ 8,753 B18-0507 437 HIGH ST 668,812.42 1,672.03 $ 5,016 $ 6,688 $ 8,360 B18-0287 145 BETHANY CURVE 601,391.82 1,503.48 $ 4,510 $ 6,014 $ 7,517 B19-0090 425 ENCINAL ST 610,943.00 1,403.28 $ 4,582 $ 6,109 $ 7,637 B17-0462 127 4TH AVE 497,090.86 1,242.73 $ 3,728 $ 4,971 $ 6,214 B18-0029 136 PLATEAU AVE 465,017.10 1,162.54 $ 3,488 $ 4,650 $ 5,813 B18-0673 139 WEST CLIFF DR 450,891.96 1,127.23 $ 3,382 $ 4,509 $ 5,636 B17-0463 416 ATLANTIC AVE 441,570.54 1,103.93 $ 3,312 $ 4,416 $ 5,520 B18-0502 109 SEABRIGHT AVE 577,202.60 1,100.36 $ 4,329 $ 5,772 $ 7,215 B19-0140 135 DUBOIS ST 440,000.00 1,100.00 $ 3,300 $ 4,400 $ 5,500 B18-0303 110 COOPER ST 201 433,054.55 1,082.64 $ 3,248 $ 4,331 $ 5,413 B18-0452 411 WOODROW AVE 423,940.00 1,059.85 $ 3,180 $ 4,239 $ 5,299 B18-0024 534 S BRANCIFORTE AVE unit 3 407,536.38 1,018.84 $ 3,057 $ 4,075 $ 5,094 B18-0023 532 S BRANCIFORTE AVE unit 2 366,273.62 915.68 $ 2,747 $ 3,663 $ 4,578 B18-0218 225 SUNSET AVE 362,670.00 906.68 $ 2,720 $ 3,627 $ 4,533 B18-0301 314 RIGG ST 352,825.48 882.06 $ 2,646 $ 3,528 $ 4,410 B18-0025 536 S BRANCIFORTE AVE unit 4 350,085.24 875.21 $ 2,626 $ 3,501 $ 4,376 B18-0514 706 PELTON AVE 328,276.42 820.69 $ 2,462 $ 3,283 $ 4,103 B19-0067 1318 EAST CLIFF DR 326,318.68 815.80 $ 2,447 $ 3,263 $ 4,079 B17-0554 401 UPPER PARK RD 321,748.61 804.37 $ 2,413 $ 3,217 $ 4,022 B18-0570 533 OCEAN ST 319,801.60 799.50 $ 2,399 $ 3,198 $ 3,998 B18-0417 345 ENCINAL ST 319,261.00 798.15 $ 2,394 $ 3,193 $ 3,991 B18-0597 303 WATER ST 313,066.50 782.67 $ 2,348 $ 3,131 $ 3,913 B18-0251 234 MARNELL AVE 310,344.36 775.86 $ 2,328 $ 3,103 $ 3,879 B18-0243 614 WALNUT AVE 297,810.30 744.53 $ 2,234 $ 2,978 $ 3,723 B19-0263 412 LOGAN ST 284,607.04 711.52 $ 2,135 $ 2,846 $ 3,558 B18-0362 2656 MISSION ST 277,036.08 692.59 $ 2,078 $ 2,770 $ 3,463 B19-0144 2929 MISSION ST 268,483.00 671.21 $ 2,014 $ 2,685 $ 3,356 B17-0660 1619 DELAWARE AVE 266,538.72 666.35 $ 1,999 $ 2,665 $ 3,332 B18-0297 125 RENO WAY 266,096.74 665.24 $ 1,996 $ 2,661 $ 3,326 B18-0356 201 LAURENT ST 262,368.16 655.92 $ 1,968 $ 2,624 $ 3,280 B19-0227 306 ANTHONY ST 257,300.56 643.25 $ 1,930 $ 2,573 $ 3,216 B18-0368 411 FAIR AVE 254,547.24 636.37 $ 1,909 $ 2,545 $ 3,182 B19-0244 915 WALNUT AVE 250,650.80 626.63 $ 1,880 $ 2,507 $ 3,133 B18-0469 719 SWIFT ST 56 250,379.02 625.95 $ 1,878 $ 2,504 $ 3,130 B18-0638 165 PLATEAU AVE 248,331.12 620.83 $ 1,862 $ 2,483 $ 3,104 B19-0064 251 3RD AVE 247,773.44 619.43 $ 1,858 $ 2,478 $ 3,097 B18-0312 1011 CEDAR ST 247,111.01 617.78 $ 1,853 $ 2,471 $ 3,089 B18-0052 123 JORDAN ST 243,320.00 608.30 $ 1,825 $ 2,433 $ 3,042 B18-0494 1141 EAST CLIFF DR 239,891.56 599.73 $ 1,799 $ 2,399 $ 2,999 B18-0454 507 MELROSE AVE 238,550.24 596.38 $ 1,789 $ 2,386 $ 2,982 B18-0357 203 YOUNGLOVE AVE 236,321.44 590.80 $ 1,772 $ 2,363 $ 2,954 B18-0470 3004 MISSION ST 234,853.00 587.13 $ 1,761 $ 2,349 $ 2,936 B18-0388 155 WALNUT AVE 229,441.17 573.60 $ 1,721 $ 2,294 $ 2,868 B18-0341 216 4TH AVE 221,351.34 553.38 $ 1,660 $ 2,214 $ 2,767 B18-0398 131 AVERITT ST 210,540.00 526.35 $ 1,579 $ 2,105 $ 2,632 B18-0244 721 SEABRIGHT AVE 207,559.68 518.90 $ 1,557 $ 2,076 $ 2,594 B18-0288 145 BETHANY CURVE 207,544.24 518.86 $ 1,557 $ 2,075 $ 2,594 B18-0355 902 WEST CLIFF DR 205,565.72 513.91 $ 1,542 $ 2,056 $ 2,570 B18-0410 1543 PACIFIC AVE 203,505.23 508.76 $ 1,526 $ 2,035 $ 2,544 B17-0537 350 ENCINAL ST 202,990.00 507.48 $ 1,522 $ 2,030 $ 2,537 B18-0291 324 OCEAN VIEW AVE A 200,295.64 500.74 $ 1,502 $ 2,003 $ 2,504 B18-0007 101 GRANDVIEW ST 199,980.00 499.95 $ 1,500 $ 2,000 $ 2,500 B18-0055 117 DELLVIEW AVE 198,990.00 497.48 $ 1,492 $ 1,990 $ 2,487 B18-0520 1141 EAST CLIFF DR 198,124.50 495.31 $ 1,486 $ 1,981 $ 2,477 B18-0396 211 FERN ST 197,308.40 493.27 $ 1,480 $ 1,973 $ 2,466 B18-0180 412 AVALON ST 194,040.00 485.10 $ 1,455 $ 1,940 $ 2,426 B19-0093 585 PACIFIC AVE 192,667.52 481.67 $ 1,445 $ 1,927 $ 2,408 B18-0505 216 BALDWIN ST 191,837.60 479.59 $ 1,439 $ 1,918 $ 2,398 B18-0693 350 ENCINAL ST 200 191,672.60 479.18 $ 1,438 $ 1,917 $ 2,396 B18-0315 1361 HIGH ST 190,960.00 477.40 $ 1,432 $ 1,910 $ 2,387 B18-0306 309 ISBEL DR 190,598.16 476.50 $ 1,429 $ 1,906 $ 2,382 B18-0535 136 JETER ST 189,200.00 473.00 $ 1,419 $ 1,892 $ 2,365 B19-0246 211 LADERA CT 187,000.00 467.50 $ 1,403 $ 1,870 $ 2,338 B18-0618 357 WESTERN DR 185,976.00 464.94 $ 1,395 $ 1,860 $ 2,325 B18-0510 220 SYLVANIA AVE 184,896.00 462.24 $ 1,387 $ 1,849 $ 2,311 B18-0295 335 HARRISON AVE 184,053.00 27.36460.13 $ 1,380 $ 1,841 $ 2,301
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY19
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (Current Rate .0025x Valuation, $50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED
REVNUES (If permits
were similar to FY19)
(.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
464 Permits $83,916,468.91 $205,988.32 $ 506,100 $ 621,096 $ 726,370 B18-0620 365 WESTERN DR 182,299.00 455.75 $ 1,367 $ 1,823 $ 2,279 B18-0621 367 WESTERN DR 182,299.00 455.75 $ 1,367 $ 1,823 $ 2,279 B18-0546 2801 MISSION ST 179,758.08 449.40 $ 1,348 $ 1,798 $ 2,247 B17-0225 716 POPLAR AVE 175,846.00 439.62 $ 1,319 $ 1,758 $ 2,198 B17-0581 709 LAUREL ST 175,016.96 437.54 $ 1,313 $ 1,750 $ 2,188 B18-0220 1762 KING ST 174,790.00 436.98 $ 1,311 $ 1,748 $ 2,185 B18-0134 425 CONTINENTAL ST 174,740.02 436.85 $ 1,311 $ 1,747 $ 2,184 B18-0700 192 HOLLYWOOD AVE 173,935.00 434.84 $ 1,305 $ 1,739 $ 2,174 B19-0034 134 BALDWIN ST 167,750.00 419.38 $ 1,258 $ 1,678 $ 2,097 B18-0263 117 MELROSE AVE 165,660.00 414.15 $ 1,242 $ 1,657 $ 2,071 B18-0339 114 PLUM ST 165,000.00 412.50 $ 1,238 $ 1,650 $ 2,063 B18-0602 123 SHERMAN ST 164,560.00 411.40 $ 1,234 $ 1,646 $ 2,057 B18-0367 1100 FAIR AVE 162,332.20 405.83 $ 1,217 $ 1,623 $ 2,029 B18-0606 243 VISTA BELLA DR 160,160.00 400.40 $ 1,201 $ 1,602 $ 2,002 B18-0399 316 ISBEL DR 160,000.00 400.00 $ 1,200 $ 1,600 $ 2,000 B18-0579 110 COOPER ST 100G 158,883.16 397.21 $ 1,192 $ 1,589 $ 1,986 B18-0325 246 CHICO AVE 158,703.75 396.76 $ 1,190 $ 1,587 $ 1,984 B17-0562 312 DAKOTA AVE 157,395.20 393.49 $ 1,180 $ 1,574 $ 1,967 B16-0523 228 MORRISSEY BLVD 154,545.30 386.36 $ 1,159 $ 1,545 $ 1,932 B19-0297 119 SHERMAN ST 151,140.00 377.85 $ 1,134 $ 1,511 $ 1,889 B18-0353 125 LIGHTHOUSE AVE 151,084.20 377.71 $ 1,133 $ 1,511 $ 1,889 B18-0634 100 Loch Lomond 150,000.00 375.00 $ 1,125 $ 1,500 $ 1,875 B17-0497 311 CENTENNIAL ST 149,600.00 374.00 $ 1,122 $ 1,496 $ 1,870 B18-0581 150 DUBOIS ST E 148,436.00 371.09 $ 1,113 $ 1,484 $ 1,855 B18-0021 102 BRADLEY DR 145,420.00 363.55 $ 1,091 $ 1,454 $ 1,818 B17-0457 318 LINDEN ST 145,119.48 362.80 $ 1,088 $ 1,451 $ 1,814 B19-0013 315 FAIR AVE 143,000.00 357.50 $ 1,073 $ 1,430 $ 1,788 B17-0557 902 MODESTO AVE 140,800.00 352.00 $ 1,056 $ 1,408 $ 1,760 B18-0359 441 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 140,217.96 350.55 $ 1,052 $ 1,402 $ 1,753 B18-0203 213 LEE ST 138,600.00 346.50 $ 1,040 $ 1,386 $ 1,733 B18-0622 369 WESTERN DR 136,881.00 342.20 $ 1,027 $ 1,369 $ 1,711 B18-0713 359 WESTERN DR 136,881.00 342.20 $ 1,027 $ 1,369 $ 1,711 B18-0532 232 ESMERALDA DR 134,823.46 337.06 $ 1,011 $ 1,348 $ 1,685 B18-0623 504 LOGAN ST 134,800.04 337.00 $ 1,011 $ 1,348 $ 1,685 B18-0126 1820 MISSION ST 134,785.20 336.96 $ 1,011 $ 1,348 $ 1,685 B18-0446 2155 DELAWARE AVE 100 134,050.00 335.13 $ 1,005 $ 1,341 $ 1,676 B18-0584 234 WAVECREST AVE 131,505.16 328.76 $ 986 $ 1,315 $ 1,644 B18-0530 129 SPRING ST 130,663.92 326.66 $ 980 $ 1,307 $ 1,633 B18-0583 104 RIVER ST 130,000.00 325.00 $ 975 $ 1,300 $ 1,625 B19-0158 912 WINDSOR ST 127,142.02 317.86 $ 954 $ 1,271 $ 1,589 B18-0640 361 WESTERN DR 127,099.00 317.75 $ 953 $ 1,271 $ 1,589 B18-0715 371 WESTERN DR 127,099.00 317.75 $ 953 $ 1,271 $ 1,589 B18-0017 404 SOQUEL AVE 124,976.00 312.44 $ 937 $ 1,250 $ 1,562 B19-0262 331 MISSION ST 124,960.00 312.40 $ 937 $ 1,250 $ 1,562 B18-0299 1025 BROADWAY 124,190.00 310.48 $ 931 $ 1,242 $ 1,552 B18-0661 229 PARK WAY 122,980.00 307.45 $ 922 $ 1,230 $ 1,537 B19-0160 1104 OCEAN ST 122,943.00 307.36 $ 922 $ 1,229 $ 1,537 B19-0221 1642 MISSION ST 122,130.75 305.33 $ 916 $ 1,221 $ 1,527 B18-0392 321 HARRISON AVE 118,580.00 296.45 $ 889 $ 1,186 $ 1,482 B18-0708 208 SUNSET AVE 118,000.00 295.00 $ 885 $ 1,180 $ 1,475 B18-0420 124 BERKSHIRE AVE 116,040.20 290.10 $ 870 $ 1,160 $ 1,451 B18-0712 141 TOWNE TER 115,197.00 283.53 $ 864 $ 1,152 $ 1,440 B18-0643 415 SEABRIGHT AVE 112,217.00 280.54 $ 842 $ 1,122 $ 1,403 B18-0236 222 COLUMBIA ST 110,000.00 275.00 $ 825 $ 1,100 $ 1,375 B18-0358 121 TRESCONY ST 109,081.08 272.70 $ 818 $ 1,091 $ 1,364 B18-0114 611 SEABRIGHT AVE 108,900.00 272.25 $ 817 $ 1,089 $ 1,361 B18-0320 313 RIVERSIDE AVE 108,595.00 271.49 $ 814 $ 1,086 $ 1,357 D19-0006 550 SECOND ST 108,000.00 270.00 $ 810 $ 1,080 $ 1,350 B18-0653 174 OXFORD WAY 100,990.32 252.48 $ 757 $ 1,010 $ 1,262 B18-0219 225 SUNSET AVE 105,061.86 251.40 $ 788 $ 1,051 $ 1,313 B18-0488 125 COULSON AVE 100,217.48 250.54 $ 752 $ 1,002 $ 1,253 B18-0006 101 GRANDVIEW ST 99,220.00 248.05 $ 744 $ 992 $ 1,240 B18-0462 523 ARROYO SECO 99,110.00 247.78 $ 743 $ 991 $ 1,239 B18-0373 115 MCCORNICK ST 99,000.00 247.50 $ 743 $ 990 $ 1,238 B18-0239 1927 OCEAN STREET EXT 98,438.40 246.10 $ 738 $ 984 $ 1,230 B18-0665 224 CHILVERTON ST 98,241.78 245.60 $ 737 $ 982 $ 1,228 B18-0326 516 LIBERTY ST 97,950.02 244.88 $ 735 $ 980 $ 1,224 B18-0523 407 OCEAN VIEW AVE 96,800.00 242.00 $ 726 $ 968 $ 1,210 B17-0006 429 GRANT ST 96,626.00 241.57 $ 725 $ 966 $ 1,208 B19-0110 519 WASHINGTON ST 94,775.00 236.94 $ 711 $ 948 $ 1,185 B18-0286 116 JAMES ST 93,843.10 234.61 $ 704 $ 938 $ 1,173 B18-0294 306 SPRING ST 91,300.00 228.25 $ 685 $ 913 $ 1,141 B19-0076 943 WINDSOR ST 91,135.64 27.37227.84 $ 684 $ 911 $ 1,139
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY19
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (Current Rate .0025x Valuation, $50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED
REVNUES (If permits
were similar to FY19)
(.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
464 Permits $83,916,468.91 $205,988.32 $ 506,100 $ 621,096 $ 726,370 B17-0411 200 CALIFORNIA ST 89,770.88 224.43 $ 673 $ 898 $ 1,122 B18-0121 120 MAGNOLIA ST 90,984.00 217.05 $ 682 $ 910 $ 1,137 B18-0230 243 YOUNGLOVE AVE 85,568.08 213.92 $ 642 $ 856 $ 1,070 B18-0333 404 SOQUEL AVE 85,000.00 212.50 $ 638 $ 850 $ 1,063 B18-0416 41 GRANDVIEW ST 85,000.00 212.50 $ 638 $ 850 $ 1,063 B17-0611 526 ISBEL DR 84,425.00 211.06 $ 633 $ 844 $ 1,055 B18-0404 116 ENGLISH DR 79,632.00 199.08 $ 597 $ 796 $ 995 B18-0346 201 ROSS ST 79,387.20 198.47 $ 595 $ 794 $ 992 B18-0234 225 MARNELL AVE 79,040.36 197.60 $ 593 $ 790 $ 988 B18-0293 430 ALTA AVE 78,036.40 195.09 $ 585 $ 780 $ 975 B18-0421 1627 KING ST 77,660.00 194.15 $ 582 $ 777 $ 971 B18-0460 306 ESMERALDA DR 77,000.00 192.50 $ 578 $ 770 $ 963 B18-0340 1017 THIRD ST 76,729.84 191.82 $ 575 $ 767 $ 959 B19-0027 318 ENCINAL ST 75,640.00 189.10 $ 567 $ 756 $ 946 B18-0229 440 OXFORD WAY 75,000.00 187.50 $ 563 $ 750 $ 938 B18-0040 125 BEACH ST 75,000.00 187.50 $ 563 $ 750 $ 938 B19-0073 101 CHURCH ST 74,682.30 186.71 $ 560 $ 747 $ 934 B18-0613 317 WANZER ST 74,458.88 186.15 $ 558 $ 745 $ 931 B19-0063 313 CLINTON ST 73,920.00 184.80 $ 554 $ 739 $ 924 B18-0044 1334 N BRANCIFORTE AVE A 73,150.00 182.88 $ 549 $ 732 $ 914 B19-0124 330 INGALLS ST B 72,928.80 182.32 $ 547 $ 729 $ 912 B18-0214 715 GHARKEY ST 72,787.20 181.97 $ 546 $ 728 $ 910 B18-0117 1143 EAST CLIFF DR 103,650.88 180.48 $ 777 $ 1,037 $ 1,296 B18-0506 350 ENCINAL ST 500 71,864.43 179.66 $ 539 $ 719 $ 898 B18-0566 112 ROSS ST 71,500.00 178.75 $ 536 $ 715 $ 894 B18-0164 214 SHERMAN ST 71,422.44 178.56 $ 536 $ 714 $ 893 B18-0501 224 LAUREL ST A101 71,222.16 178.06 $ 534 $ 712 $ 890 B18-0174 714 FAIRMOUNT AVE 71,119.16 177.80 $ 533 $ 711 $ 889 B18-0678 326 YOUNGLOVE AVE 71,060.00 177.65 $ 533 $ 711 $ 888 B17-0653 122 PARNELL ST 70,967.52 177.42 $ 532 $ 710 $ 887 B18-0267 107 ATLANTIC AVE A 70,967.52 177.42 $ 532 $ 710 $ 887 B15-0249 530 HIGH ST 637,626.96 175.16 $ 4,782 $ 6,376 $ 7,970 B19-0083 115 VISTA BRANCIFORTE 70,000.00 175.00 $ 525 $ 700 $ 875 B18-0683 2200 DELAWARE AVE 69,021.16 172.55 $ 518 $ 690 $ 863 B18-0668 309 RAYMOND ST 68,490.00 171.23 $ 514 $ 685 $ 856 B18-0629 1424 N BRANCIFORTE AVE 67,934.72 169.84 $ 510 $ 679 $ 849 B19-0132 270 SOQUEL AVE 65,241.90 163.10 $ 489 $ 652 $ 816 B18-0568 1010 PACIFIC AVE F 65,205.75 163.01 $ 489 $ 652 $ 815 B19-0127 2203 MISSION ST 65,000.00 162.50 $ 488 $ 650 $ 813 B17-0560 41 GRANDVIEW ST 63,438.08 158.60 $ 476 $ 634 $ 793 B18-0348 125 BEACH ST 61,758.72 154.40 $ 463 $ 618 $ 772 B19-0251 118 LADERA DR 60,060.00 150.15 $ 450 $ 601 $ 751 B18-0414 1311 KING ST 59,180.00 147.95 $ 444 $ 592 $ 740 B18-0650 720 FRONT ST 55,726.50 139.32 $ 418 $ 557 $ 697 B18-0493 225 PLATEAU AVE 54,865.40 137.16 $ 411 $ 549 $ 686 B18-0451 107 GREEN ST 53,790.00 134.48 $ 403 $ 538 $ 672 B17-0536 134 HUGUS AVE 53,225.64 133.06 $ 399 $ 532 $ 665 B18-0516 120 BAYMOUNT ST 52,800.00 132.00 $ 396 $ 528 $ 660 B18-0465 153 MARINE PARADE 52,315.80 130.79 $ 392 $ 523 $ 654 B18-0248 514 CLIFF ST 52,251.88 130.63 $ 392 $ 523 $ 653 B18-0476 660 ESCALONA DR 51,700.00 129.25 $ 388 $ 517 $ 646 B18-0533 215 ANITA ST 50,799.40 127.00 $ 381 $ 508 $ 635 B18-0656 1901 MISSION ST 50,000.00 125.00 $ 375 $ 500 $ 625 B18-0595 1225 N BRANCIFORTE AVE 49,737.92 124.34 $ 373 $ 497 $ 622 B18-0491 420 WESTERN DR 49,500.00 123.75 $ 371 $ 495 $ 619 B18-0413 128 MASON ST 49,283.00 123.21 $ 370 $ 493 $ 616 B18-0578 118 COOPER ST 49,119.75 122.80 $ 368 $ 491 $ 614 B18-0637 101 ROOSEVELT TER 48,828.08 122.07 $ 366 $ 488 $ 610 B19-0163 1014 SUMNER ST 48,070.00 120.18 $ 361 $ 481 $ 601 B18-0649 311 SECOND ST 48,000.00 120.00 $ 360 $ 480 $ 600 B19-0311 317 LIGHTHOUSE AVE 47,450.00 118.63 $ 356 $ 475 $ 593 B18-0389 704 MONARCH WAY 46,170.40 115.43 $ 346 $ 462 $ 577 B18-0580 418 CEDAR ST 45,000.00 112.50 $ 338 $ 450 $ 563 B18-0335 222 COLUMBIA ST 44,651.00 111.63 $ 335 $ 447 $ 558 B19-0187 220 BERKELEY WAY 42,888.00 107.22 $ 322 $ 429 $ 536 B17-0692 109 CYPRESS AVE 42,240.00 105.60 $ 317 $ 422 $ 528 B19-0133 400 BEACH ST 40,000.00 100.00 $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 B19-0119 236 ENCINAL ST 40,000.00 100.00 $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 B19-0191 349 WESTERN DR 40,000.00 100.00 $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 B19-0195 357 WESTERN DR 40,000.00 100.00 $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 B19-0200 369 WESTERN DR 40,000.00 100.00 $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 B19-0204 377 WESTERN DR 40,000.00 100.00 $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 B18-0370 219 CYPRESS AVE 39,621.84 27.3899.05 $ 297 $ 396 $ 495
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY19
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (Current Rate .0025x Valuation, $50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED
REVNUES (If permits
were similar to FY19)
(.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
464 Permits $83,916,468.91 $205,988.32 $ 506,100 $ 621,096 $ 726,370 B19-0029 518 S BRANCIFORTE AVE 39,380.00 98.45 $ 295 $ 394 $ 492 B18-0351 134 DAKOTA AVE 50,549.40 98.29 $ 379 $ 505 $ 632 B18-0321 118 BALDWIN ST 39,049.20 97.62 $ 293 $ 390 $ 488 B19-0141 440 ESCALONA DR 56,540.00 96.80 $ 424 $ 565 $ 707 B18-0674 2929 MISSION ST 38,531.50 96.33 $ 289 $ 385 $ 482 B18-0682 400 ESMERALDA DR 38,449.76 96.12 $ 288 $ 384 $ 481 B18-0459 1540 PACIFIC AVE 38,300.00 95.75 $ 287 $ 383 $ 479 B19-0151 1040 WEST CLIFF DR 38,075.48 95.19 $ 286 $ 381 $ 476 B19-0226 414 ROXAS ST A 38,000.00 95.00 $ 285 $ 380 $ 475 B19-0278 414 ROXAS ST 73,000.00 95.00 $ 548 $ 730 $ 913 B18-0471 910 MODESTO AVE 39,990.00 93.23 $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 B18-0633 810 BROADWAY 37,000.16 92.50 $ 278 $ 370 $ 463 B18-0405 320 STANFORD AVE 36,850.00 92.13 $ 276 $ 369 $ 461 B18-0619 363 WESTERN DR 36,661.00 91.65 $ 275 $ 367 $ 458 B18-0478 310 ALTA VISTA DR 36,300.00 90.75 $ 272 $ 363 $ 454 B18-0671 401 OCEAN VIEW AVE 36,300.00 90.75 $ 272 $ 363 $ 454 B18-0252 234 MARNELL AVE 36,230.80 90.58 $ 272 $ 362 $ 453 B17-0542 1531 ESCALONA DR 49,060.00 89.65 $ 368 $ 491 $ 613 B19-0024 213 WILKES CIR 35,640.00 89.10 $ 267 $ 356 $ 446 B19-0291 1511 BAY ST 35,420.00 88.55 $ 266 $ 354 $ 443
B18-0672 1003 CEDAR ST 35,330.06 88.33 $ 265 $ 353 $ 442 B19-0020 204 KAYE ST D 35,200.00 88.00 $ 264 $ 352 $ 440 B19-0161 153 SUBURBIA AVE 35,200.00 88.00 $ 264 $ 352 $ 440 B18-0485 1642 MISSION ST 35,000.00 87.50 $ 263 $ 350 $ 438 B19-0120 347 CORAL ST 35,000.00 87.50 $ 263 $ 350 $ 438 B18-0503 119 NATIONAL ST 45,220.00 83.05 $ 339 $ 452 $ 565 B19-0021 235 MAY AVE 33,040.50 82.60 $ 248 $ 330 $ 413
B18-0524 1010 FAIR AVE H 32,938.00 82.35 $ 247 $ 329 $ 412 B18-0572 114 KIRBY ST 32,676.08 81.69 $ 245 $ 327 $ 408 B19-0075 1108 PACIFIC AVE 32,025.00 80.06 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 B19-0192 351 WESTERN DR 32,000.00 80.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 B19-0193 353 WESTERN DR 32,000.00 80.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 B19-0194 355 WESTERN DR 32,000.00 80.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 B19-0196 359 WESTERN DR 32,000.00 80.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 B19-0197 361 WESTERN DR 32,000.00 80.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 B19-0198 365 WESTERN DR 32,000.00 80.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 B19-0199 367 WESTERN DR 32,000.00 80.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 B19-0201 371 WESTERN DR 32,000.00 80.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 B19-0202 373 WESTERN DR 32,000.00 80.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 B19-0203 375 WESTERN DR 32,000.00 80.00 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 B18-0205 320 KING ST 31,754.36 79.39 $ 238 $ 318 $ 397
B16-0471 320 BROADWAY 106,920.00 76.45 $ 802 $ 1,069 $ 1,337 B18-0573 113 TRESCONY ST 30,215.12 75.54 $ 227 $ 302 $ 378 B18-0562 230 MISSION ST 30,000.00 75.00 $ 225 $ 300 $ 375 B18-0148 604 SECOND ST 30,000.00 75.00 $ 225 $ 300 $ 375 B18-0691 1040 WEST CLIFF DR 30,000.00 75.00 $ 225 $ 300 $ 375 B19-0015 150 SUNNYSIDE AVE 29,700.00 74.25 $ 223 $ 297 $ 371 B19-0156 309 ISBEL DR 29,700.00 74.25 $ 223 $ 297 $ 371 B18-0538 118 COOPER ST 29,108.00 72.77 $ 218 $ 291 $ 364 B18-0495 911 SOQUEL AVE 29,000.00 72.50 $ 218 $ 290 $ 363 B18-0101 101 COOPER ST B 28,725.00 71.81 $ 215 $ 287 $ 359 B18-0257 202 BERKSHIRE AVE 28,600.00 71.50 $ 215 $ 286 $ 358 B19-0094 112 HARVARD ST 28,600.00 71.50 $ 215 $ 286 $ 358 B18-0604 611 SEABRIGHT AVE 28,000.00 70.00 $ 210 $ 280 $ 350 B19-0318 434 ROXAS ST 27,720.00 69.30 $ 208 $ 277 $ 347 B18-0598 104 FREDERICK ST 27,500.00 68.75 $ 206 $ 275 $ 344 B18-0481 928 WEST CLIFF DR 27,252.50 68.13 $ 204 $ 273 $ 341 B18-0395 559 HIGH ST 26,983.70 67.46 $ 202 $ 270 $ 337
B18-0284 340 PLYMOUTH ST 26,250.24 65.63 $ 197 $ 263 $ 328 B18-0365 114 ARROYO CT 25,300.00 63.25 $ 190 $ 253 $ 316 B18-0539 2238 MISSION ST 25,086.50 62.72 $ 188 $ 251 $ 314 B18-0329 350 ENCINAL ST 25,000.00 62.50 $ 188 $ 250 $ 313 B19-0179 136 ENCINAL ST 25,000.00 62.50 $ 188 $ 250 $ 313 B19-0339 508 CALEDONIA ST 25,000.00 62.50 $ 188 $ 250 $ 313 B19-0344 1712 DELAWARE AVE 24,750.00 61.88 $ 186 $ 248 $ 309 B19-0157 85 S BRANCIFORTE AVE 24,640.00 61.60 $ 185 $ 246 $ 308 B19-0215 116 MAJORS ST 104,500.00 60.50 $ 784 $ 1,045 $ 1,306 B19-0096 338 RIVERSIDE AVE 24,000.00 60.00 $ 180 $ 240 $ 300 B18-0496 1001 COLUMBIA ST 23,994.36 59.99 $ 180 $ 240 $ 300 B18-0498 1003 COLUMBIA ST 23,994.36 59.99 $ 180 $ 240 $ 300 B18-0675 165 PLATEAU AVE 23,720.92 59.30 $ 178 $ 237 $ 297 B18-0529 116 ENGLISH DR 23,540.00 58.85 $ 177 $ 235 $ 294 B18-0666 117 QUARRY CT 23,100.00 27.3957.75 $ 173 $ 231 $ 289
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY19
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (Current Rate .0025x Valuation, $50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED
REVNUES (If permits
were similar to FY19)
(.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
464 Permits $83,916,468.91 $205,988.32 $ 506,100 $ 621,096 $ 726,370 B18-0364 1718 SOQUEL AVE 23,000.00 57.50 $ 173 $ 230 $ 288 B18-0608 110 CARDIFF CT 22,880.00 57.20 $ 172 $ 229 $ 286 B18-0647 301 PACIFIC AVE 22,756.00 56.89 $ 171 $ 228 $ 284 B18-0639 501 SOQUEL AVE 22,000.00 55.00 $ 165 $ 220 $ 275 B19-0098 208 OCEAN ST 22,000.00 55.00 $ 165 $ 220 $ 275 B18-0350 341 DUFOUR ST 20,900.00 52.25 $ 157 $ 209 $ 261 B18-0433 402 LAURENT ST 20,887.20 52.22 $ 157 $ 209 $ 261 B18-0517 1824 SOQUEL AVE 20,490.50 51.23 $ 154 $ 205 $ 256 B18-0445 331 MAIN ST 20,240.00 50.60 $ 152 $ 202 $ 253
B19-0092 100 NORTHROP PL 20,180.86 50.45 $ 151 $ 202 $ 252 B18-0178 3004 MISSION ST 20,000.00 50.00 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250 B18-0569 299 SAN JOSE AVE 20,000.00 50.00 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250 E16-0259 1001 RIVER ST 20,000.00 50.00 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250 B18-0576 1007 FAIR AVE 19,580.00 48.95 $ 147 $ 196 $ 245 B19-0135 611 SEABRIGHT AVE 19,402.80 48.51 $ 146 $ 194 $ 243 B18-0657 526 CALIFORNIA AVE 19,360.00 48.40 $ 145 $ 194 $ 242 B18-0658 528 CALIFORNIA AVE 19,360.00 48.40 $ 145 $ 194 $ 242 B18-0486 709 CENTER ST 19,200.00 48.00 $ 144 $ 192 $ 240 B19-0303 1016 WEST CLIFF DR 18,047.04 45.12 $ 135 $ 180 $ 226 B18-0440 720 HANOVER ST 8,986.56 44.93 $ 67 $ 90 $ 112
B19-0099 110 ARROYO CT 17,600.00 44.00 $ 132 $ 176 $ 220 B19-0164 207 CHURCH ST 17,235.00 43.09 $ 129 $ 172 $ 215 B18-0564 219 CLINTON ST 17,160.00 42.90 $ 129 $ 172 $ 215 B18-0455 519 PARK WAY 17,050.00 42.63 $ 128 $ 171 $ 213 B18-0390 111 OCEAN ST 17,000.00 42.50 $ 128 $ 170 $ 213 B19-0361 2030 N PACIFIC AVE 124 17,000.00 42.50 $ 128 $ 170 $ 213 B19-0072 726 SAN JUAN AVE 16,687.50 41.72 $ 125 $ 167 $ 209 B19-0296 713 WOODROW AVE 16,500.00 41.25 $ 124 $ 165 $ 206 B19-0162 241 MAIN ST 16,500.00 41.25 $ 124 $ 165 $ 206
B19-0264 147 CAROL AVE 16,440.40 41.10 $ 123 $ 164 $ 206 B18-0698 353 ALAMO AVE 15,400.00 38.50 $ 116 $ 154 $ 193 B16-0400 122 FAIRMOUNT AVE 177,198.44 37.91 $ 1,329 $ 1,772 $ 2,215 B18-0483 820 SWIFT ST B 15,119.52 37.80 $ 113 $ 151 $ 189 B18-0246 204 UNION ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B18-0659 110 QUINTANA CT 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B18-0686 153 CLAY ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188
B19-0012 115 CALCITA DR 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B18-0492 555 SOQUEL AVE 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 E18-0282 2801 MISSION ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B19-0123 303 WATER ST 100 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B17-0531 224 WOODROW AVE 14,765.76 36.91 $ 111 $ 148 $ 185 B19-0113 409 LINDEN ST 14,581.92 36.45 $ 109 $ 146 $ 182 B18-0644 346 CHESTNUT ST 42,570.00 36.03 $ 319 $ 426 $ 532 B19-0298 215 OREGON ST 14,405.80 36.01 $ 108 $ 144 $ 180 B19-0077 211 CYPRESS PARK 14,080.00 35.20 $ 106 $ 141 $ 176 B19-0211 315 GHARKEY ST 24,904.48 33.55 $ 187 $ 249 $ 311 B19-0059 132 CLAY ST COMMON 13,396.87 33.49 $ 100 $ 134 $ 167 B18-0556 709 MISSION ST 13,200.00 33.00 $ 99 $ 132 $ 165 B19-0284 925 FAIR AVE 13,200.00 33.00 $ 99 $ 132 $ 165
B19-0279 113 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE 13,090.00 32.73 $ 98 $ 131 $ 164 B18-0434 230 SEAVIEW AVE 13,000.00 32.50 $ 98 $ 130 $ 163 B19-0174 602 MIRAMAR DR 12,980.00 32.45 $ 97 $ 130 $ 162 B18-0430 133 MISSION ST 1 12,351.75 30.88 $ 93 $ 124 $ 154 B18-0511 132 PROSPECT CT 12,320.00 30.80 $ 92 $ 123 $ 154 B19-0143 324 LINDEN ST 12,320.00 30.80 $ 92 $ 123 $ 154 B18-0274 308 CAYUGA ST 12,304.80 30.76 $ 92 $ 123 $ 154 B18-0409 400 BEACH ST 12,000.00 30.00 $ 90 $ 120 $ 150
B18-0444 217 RAYMOND ST A 12,000.00 30.00 $ 90 $ 120 $ 150 B19-0071 132 JETER ST 12,000.00 30.00 $ 90 $ 120 $ 150
B18-0654 203 KALKAR DR 11,990.00 29.98 $ 90 $ 120 $ 150 B19-0209 219 WAVECREST AVE 11,860.00 29.65 $ 89 $ 119 $ 148 B18-0255 647 ALMAR AVE 11,000.00 27.50 $ 83 $ 110 $ 138 B19-0011 232 BAYONA DR 11,000.00 27.50 $ 83 $ 110 $ 138 B19-0306 97 FREDERICK ST A 10,560.00 26.40 $ 79 $ 106 $ 132 B16-0281 1804 OCEAN ST 10,390.72 25.98 $ 78 $ 104 $ 130 B18-0279 1901 MISSION ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B18-0324 335 MISSION ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B17-0213 126 PLYMOUTH ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B18-0463 75 RIVER ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
B18-0209 119 SEABRIGHT AVE 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B18-0663 322 PLATEAU AVE 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B18-0709 1324 MISSION ST B 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B18-0660 509 CENTER ST 10,000.00 27.4025.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY19
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (Current Rate .0025x Valuation, $50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED
REVNUES (If permits
were similar to FY19)
(.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
464 Permits $83,916,468.91 $205,988.32 $ 506,100 $ 621,096 $ 726,370 B19-0122 214 VISTA BELLA DR 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B19-0006 400 BEACH ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
B19-0109 400 BEACH ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125
B19-0155 127 OCEAN ST 4 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B19-0212 112 EUCALYPTUS AVE 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B19-0159 175 WEST CLIFF DR 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B19-0259 2202 WEST CLIFF DR 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B19-0288 412 CENTER ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B17-0489 335 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 157,366.72 24.34 $ 1,180 $ 1,574 $ 1,967 B18-0118 518 OCEAN ST 9,200.00 23.00 $ 69 $ 92 $ 115
B17-0561 716 MONTEREY ST 9,000.00 22.50 $ 68 $ 90 $ 113 B19-0111 533 OCEAN ST 9,000.00 22.50 $ 68 $ 90 $ 113
B19-0265 228 SEASIDE ST 9,000.00 22.50 $ 68 $ 90 $ 113
B18-0594 502 FREDERICK ST 8,613.36 21.53 $ 65 $ 86 $ 108 B18-0473 200 WEST CLIFF DR 8 8,506.12 21.27 $ 64 $ 85 $ 106 B18-0438 431 CLINTON ST 8,203.20 20.51 $ 62 $ 82 $ 103
B18-0458 2116 WEST CLIFF DR 8,000.00 20.00 $ 60 $ 80 $ 100 B18-0298 101 ALLEGRO DR 8,000.00 20.00 $ 60 $ 80 $ 100
B18-0408 904 MISSION ST 8,000.00 20.00 $ 60 $ 80 $ 100
B18-0574 922 WINDSOR ST 7,505.82 18.76 $ 56 $ 75 $ 94
B18-0237 442 OXFORD WAY 7,326.70 18.32 $ 55 $ 73 $ 92
B18-0676 121 TREE FROG LN 7,260.00 18.15 $ 54 $ 73 $ 91 B19-0126 302 CYPRESS AVE 7,176.60 17.94 $ 54 $ 72 $ 90
B19-0385 236 DARWIN ST 7,148.00 17.87 $ 54 $ 71 $ 89
B19-0121 152 PECK TER 7,040.00 17.60 $ 53 $ 70 $ 88
B19-0222 233 FELIX ST 6,933.56 17.33 $ 52 $ 69 $ 87
B18-0563 103 WINDHAM ST 6,836.00 17.09 $ 51 $ 68 $ 85
B19-0282 126 LIBERTY ST 6,836.00 17.09 $ 51 $ 68 $ 85
B18-0607 150 PECK TER 6,600.00 16.50 $ 50 $ 66 $ 83
P19-0074 708 RIVERSIDE AVE 6,400.00 16.00 $ 48 $ 64 $ 80 B18-0422 416 CENTER ST 6,289.12 15.72 $ 47 $ 63 $ 79
B18-0641 1007 CEDAR ST 6,223.75 15.56 $ 47 $ 62 $ 78
B19-0166 115 CORAL ST 6,143.33 15.36 $ 46 $ 61 $ 77
B18-0400 347 CORAL ST 6,000.00 15.00 $ 45 $ 60 $ 75
B19-0074 1010 PACIFIC AVE F 6,000.00 15.00 $ 45 $ 60 $ 75 B19-0060 132 CLAY ST COMMON 5,769.78 14.42 $ 43 $ 58 $ 72 B18-0695 904 MISSION ST 5,757.48 14.39 $ 43 $ 58 $ 72
B19-0022 720 FRONT ST 5,600.00 14.00 $ 42 $ 56 $ 70
B18-0587 402 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 5,500.00 13.75 $ 41 $ 55 $ 69 B18-0268 207 OCEAN ST B 5,500.00 13.75 $ 41 $ 55 $ 69
B18-0424 698 FRONT ST 5,400.00 13.50 $ 41 $ 54 $ 68
B18-0480 930 WEST CLIFF DR 5,280.00 13.20 $ 40 $ 53 $ 66 B19-0033 1803 KING ST 5,235.52 13.09 $ 39 $ 52 $ 65
B18-0182 1266 SOQUEL AVE 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B18-0610 826 PELTON AVE 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B18-0611 207 ALHAMBRA AVE 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63 B19-0178 550 SECOND ST 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B19-0139 625 WATER ST 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B19-0145 324 FRONT ST 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B18-0525 242 ALTA AVE 4,950.00 12.38 $ 37 $ 50 $ 62
B18-0515 413 WESTERN DR 3 4,950.00 12.38 $ 37 $ 50 $ 62 B19-0057 272 SWANTON BLVD 4,950.00 12.38 $ 37 $ 50 $ 62 B19-0184 1133 PACIFIC AVE 4,800.00 12.00 $ 36 $ 48 $ 60 B18-0456 129 GRANT ST 5 4,500.00 11.25 $ 34 $ 45 $ 56
B18-0655 420 RIVER ST 4,400.00 11.00 $ 33 $ 44 $ 55
B18-0423 122 BLACKBURN ST 4,288.80 10.72 $ 32 $ 43 $ 54 B18-0432 510 KING ST 4,288.80 10.72 $ 32 $ 43 $ 54
B18-0609 41 GRANDVIEW ST 906 4,262.50 10.66 $ 32 $ 43 $ 53 B18-0436 1203 MISSION ST 17 4,140.00 10.35 $ 31 $ 41 $ 52 B18-0544 126 ANITA ST 4,135.86 10.34 $ 31 $ 41 $ 52
B18-0670 120 RATHBURN WAY 4,101.60 10.25 $ 31 $ 41 $ 51 B18-0345 129 BULKHEAD ST 4,000.00 10.00 $ 30 $ 40 $ 50
B18-0198 1528 PACIFIC AVE 4,000.00 10.00 $ 30 $ 40 $ 50 B19-0340 1104 OCEAN ST 4,000.00 10.00 $ 30 $ 40 $ 50
B18-0591 611 SEABRIGHT AVE 3,681.22 9.20 $ 28 $ 37 $ 46 B19-0337 110 KAYE ST 3,369.96 8.43 $ 25 $ 34 $ 42
B18-0577 843 GHARKEY ST 12,818.90 8.30 $ 96 $ 128 $ 160 B19-0036 110 SHELTER LAGOON DR 3,300.00 8.25 $ 25 $ 33 $ 41 B18-0083 126 GRANT ST 3,267.84 8.17 $ 25 $ 33 $ 41
B18-0084 128 GRANT ST 3,267.84 8.17 $ 25 $ 33 $ 41
B18-0085 130 GRANT ST 3,267.84 8.17 $ 25 $ 33 $ 41
B18-0086 132 GRANT ST 3,267.84 8.17 $ 25 $ 33 $ 41
B18-0087 134 GRANT ST 3,267.84 27.41 8.17 $ 25 $ 33 $ 41
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY19
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (Current Rate .0025x Valuation, $50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.0075 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED REVNUES (If
permits were similar to
FY19)
(.01 x Valuation, $50,000
cap)
EXPECTED
REVNUES (If permits
were similar to FY19)
(.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
464 Permits $83,916,468.91 $205,988.32 $ 506,100 $ 621,096 $ 726,370 B18-0088 136 GRANT ST 3,267.84 8.17 $ 25 $ 33 $ 41
B18-0096 138 GRANT ST 3,267.84 8.17 $ 25 $ 33 $ 41
B18-0097 140 GRANT ST 3,267.84 8.17 $ 25 $ 33 $ 41
B18-0518 219 LEONARD ST A 3,252.34 8.13 $ 24 $ 33 $ 41
B19-0058 132 CLAY ST COMMON 3,095.51 7.74 $ 23 $ 31 $ 39 B19-0225 55 MUNICIPAL WHARF 3,000.00 7.50 $ 23 $ 30 $ 38 B18-0406 214 KING ST 2,948.55 7.37 $ 22 $ 29 $ 37
B18-0680 1030 RIVER ST 101 2,800.00 7.00 $ 21 $ 28 $ 35 B18-0245 1411 PACIFIC AVE 2,500.00 6.25 $ 19 $ 25 $ 31
B18-0704 2310 WEST CLIFF DR 2,500.00 6.25 $ 19 $ 25 $ 31 B18-0662 501 RIVER ST A 2,500.00 6.25 $ 19 $ 25 $ 31
B18-0636 720 HANOVER ST 2,395.00 5.99 $ 18 $ 24 $ 30
B19-0169 209 WEEKS AVE 2,037.18 5.09 $ 15 $ 20 $ 25
B18-0589 1820 MISSION ST 2,000.00 5.00 $ 15 $ 20 $ 25
B19-0165 115 CORAL ST 2,000.00 5.00 $ 15 $ 20 $ 25
B19-0360 119 ALGEA ST 1,953.05 4.88 $ 15 $ 20 $ 24
B18-0317 610 PACIFIC AVE 1 1,929.96 4.83 $ 14 $ 19 $ 24 B18-0318 610 PACIFIC AVE 5 1,929.96 4.83 $ 14 $ 19 $ 24 B18-0472 200 WEST CLIFF DR 14 1,715.52 4.29 $ 13 $ 17 $ 21 B18-0363 1314 OCEAN ST 1A 1,700.00 4.25 $ 13 $ 17 $ 21
B19-0261 1323 LAUREL ST 1,650.00 4.13 $ 12 $ 17 $ 21
B19-0061 110 YOUNGER WAY 1,531.80 3.83 $ 11 $ 15 $ 19
B18-0519 217 OTIS ST 1,500.00 3.75 $ 11 $ 15 $ 19
B19-0228 1543 PACIFIC AVE 1,200.00 3.00 $ 9 $ 12 $ 15
B16-0583 714 THIRD ST 127,780.16 2.86 $ 958 $ 1,278 $ 1,597 B18-0550 71 FRONT ST 2 450.00 1.13 $ 3 $ 5 $ 6
27.42 GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY18
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation,
$50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0075 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.01 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
482 TOTAL PERMITS $84,806,173.75 $207,704.62 $ 511,171 $ 648,228 $ 785,286 B16-0589 1547 PACIFIC AVE 21,332,460.09 50,000.00 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 B17-0596 708 WATER ST 8,650,864.84 21,627.16 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 B16-0685 108 SYCAMORE ST 3,438,569.10 8,596.42 $ 25,789 $ 34,386 $ 42,982 B17-0330 630 WATER ST 2,087,974.62 5,219.94 $ 15,660 $ 20,880 $ 26,100 B17-0285 126 PENGUIN CT 1,487,077.50 3,295.68 $ 11,153 $ 14,871 $ 18,588 B17-0528 111 MADRONE ST CMN-10 1,279,986.00 3,199.97 $ 9,600 $ 12,800 $ 16,000 B17-0163 2656 MISSION ST 1,243,819.13 3,109.55 $ 9,329 $ 12,438 $ 15,548 B17-0400 106 LARS WAY 926,372.48 2,315.93 $ 6,948 $ 9,264 $ 11,580 B18-0043 120 TOLEDO ST 857,307.84 2,143.27 $ 6,430 $ 8,573 $ 10,716 B18-0054 124 PHELAN CT 828,815.66 2,072.04 $ 6,216 $ 8,288 $ 10,360 B18-0282 101 CHURCH ST 785,676.84 1,964.19 $ 5,893 $ 7,857 $ 9,821 B17-0600 1046 WEST CLIFF DR 783,361.18 1,958.40 $ 5,875 $ 7,834 $ 9,792 B17-0657 239 POPLAR AVE 779,683.20 1,949.21 $ 5,848 $ 7,797 $ 9,746 B17-0672 515 FAIR AVE 770,627.08 1,926.57 $ 5,780 $ 7,706 $ 9,633 B18-0207 75 RIVER ST 661,850.00 1,654.63 $ 4,964 $ 6,619 $ 8,273 B17-0317 111 LAGUNA ST 633,861.58 1,584.65 $ 4,754 $ 6,339 $ 7,923 B16-0689 141 HAGEMANN AVE 615,976.64 1,539.94 $ 4,620 $ 6,160 $ 7,700 B17-0516 138 DAKE AVE 571,853.38 1,429.63 $ 4,289 $ 5,719 $ 7,148 B15-0249 530 HIGH ST 637,626.96 1,418.91 $ 4,782 $ 6,376 $ 7,970 B17-0526 123 PRINCETON ST 553,300.00 1,383.25 $ 4,150 $ 5,533 $ 6,916 B17-0373 710 PELTON AVE 547,812.70 1,369.53 $ 4,109 $ 5,478 $ 6,848 B16-0695 221 LAGUNA ST 530,362.40 1,325.91 $ 3,978 $ 5,304 $ 6,630 B17-0567 960 WEST CLIFF DR 522,720.00 1,306.80 $ 3,920 $ 5,227 $ 6,534 B17-0347 769 WESTERN DR 519,501.88 1,298.75 $ 3,896 $ 5,195 $ 6,494 B17-0390 148 SUNNYSIDE AVE 506,337.75 1,265.84 $ 3,798 $ 5,063 $ 6,329 B17-0296 321 ALTA AVE 486,637.58 1,216.59 $ 3,650 $ 4,866 $ 6,083 B17-0312 1541 PACIFIC AVE A 469,113.90 1,172.78 $ 3,518 $ 4,691 $ 5,864 B17-0401 102 LARS WAY 451,234.08 1,128.09 $ 3,384 $ 4,512 $ 5,640 B17-0402 100 LARS WAY 451,234.08 1,128.09 $ 3,384 $ 4,512 $ 5,640 B17-0443 204 PROSPECT HTS 448,844.92 1,122.11 $ 3,366 $ 4,488 $ 5,611 B17-0186 132 MONTEREY ST 430,590.00 1,076.48 $ 3,229 $ 4,306 $ 5,382 B18-0217 208 PROSPECT HTS 400,662.32 1,001.66 $ 3,005 $ 4,007 $ 5,008 B16-0678 324 PENNSYLVANIA AVE TO 326 395,780.00 989.45 $ 2,968 $ 3,958 $ 4,947 B16-0478 115 FAIR AVE 394,990.08 987.48 $ 2,962 $ 3,950 $ 4,937 B17-0356 220 SYLVANIA AVE 384,994.56 962.49 $ 2,887 $ 3,850 $ 4,812 B16-0398 828 WALNUT AVE 374,988.80 937.47 $ 2,812 $ 3,750 $ 4,687 B17-0324 113 WOODS ST 372,492.56 931.23 $ 2,794 $ 3,725 $ 4,656 B17-0365 242 BERKELEY WAY 365,067.00 912.67 $ 2,738 $ 3,651 $ 4,563 B17-0511 324 ENCINAL ST 364,279.72 910.70 $ 2,732 $ 3,643 $ 4,553 B18-0137 630 MEDER ST 360,938.76 902.35 $ 2,707 $ 3,609 $ 4,512 B17-0133 146 OXFORD WAY 336,160.00 840.40 $ 2,521 $ 3,362 $ 4,202 B17-0671 1901 MISSION ST 327,191.14 817.98 $ 2,454 $ 3,272 $ 4,090 B17-0552 2841 MISSION ST 312,685.16 781.71 $ 2,345 $ 3,127 $ 3,909 B17-0278 224 OREGON ST 310,254.56 775.64 $ 2,327 $ 3,103 $ 3,878 B18-0129 220 MERCED AVE 290,400.00 726.00 $ 2,178 $ 2,904 $ 3,630 B17-0535 1203 MISSION ST 17 288,460.75 721.15 $ 2,163 $ 2,885 $ 3,606 B18-0165 347 CORAL ST 280,164.50 700.41 $ 2,101 $ 2,802 $ 3,502 B17-0577 212 LOCUST ST 273,845.00 684.61 $ 2,054 $ 2,738 $ 3,423 B17-0479 231 OREGON ST 257,886.00 644.72 $ 1,934 $ 2,579 $ 3,224 B16-0539 1005 COLUMBIA ST 255,071.46 637.68 $ 1,913 $ 2,551 $ 3,188 B17-0646 1901 MISSION ST 254,618.74 636.55 $ 1,910 $ 2,546 $ 3,183 B17-0545 434 ALTA AVE 276,153.66 633.47 $ 2,071 $ 2,762 $ 3,452 B17-0218 356 ALTA AVE 251,117.68 627.79 $ 1,883 $ 2,511 $ 3,139 B18-0018 420 RIVER ST 247,035.00 617.59 $ 1,853 $ 2,470 $ 3,088 B17-0694 110 4TH AVE 244,174.54 610.44 $ 1,831 $ 2,442 $ 3,052 B17-0368 115 HALL ST 240,801.38 602.00 $ 1,806 $ 2,408 $ 3,010 B17-0321 413 LAUREL ST 240,596.99 601.49 $ 1,804 $ 2,406 $ 3,007 B17-0391 148 SUNNYSIDE AVE B 238,089.51 595.22 $ 1,786 $ 2,381 $ 2,976 B17-0480 102 MOORE ST 232,320.00 580.80 $ 1,742 $ 2,323 $ 2,904 B17-0482 817 MODESTO AVE 230,094.58 575.24 $ 1,726 $ 2,301 $ 2,876 B16-0002 1547 PACIFIC AVE 223,375.00 558.44 $ 1,675 $ 2,234 $ 2,792 B17-0117 919 SUMNER ST 220,347.20 550.87 $ 1,653 $ 2,203 $ 2,754 B17-0313 303 AUBURN AVE 212,630.00 531.58 $ 1,595 $ 2,126 $ 2,658 B18-0231 250 NATURAL BRIDGES DR 210,650.00 526.63 $ 1,580 $ 2,107 $ 2,633 B17-0206 527 S BRANCIFORTE AVE 204,380.00 510.95 $ 1,533 $ 2,044 $ 2,555 B17-0343 1314 OCEAN ST 203,198.90 508.00 $ 1,524 $ 2,032 $ 2,540 B17-0367 1135 N BRANCIFORTE AVE 198,000.00 495.00 $ 1,485 $ 1,980 $ 2,475 B17-0541 1901 MISSION ST 196,500.00 491.25 $ 1,474 $ 1,965 $ 2,456 B17-0256 215 SEASIDE ST 194,579.32 486.45 $ 1,459 $ 1,946 $ 2,432 B17-0244 136 MORRISSEY BLVD 193,113.34 482.78 $ 1,448 $ 1,931 $ 2,414 B17-0676 236 ENCINAL ST 190,309.44 475.7727.43 $ 1,427 $ 1,903 $ 2,379
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY18
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation,
$50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0075 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.01 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
482 TOTAL PERMITS $84,806,173.75 $207,704.62 $ 511,171 $ 648,228 $ 785,286 B18-0064 722 SEASIDE ST 188,614.06 471.54 $ 1,415 $ 1,886 $ 2,358 B16-0620 353 FAIRMOUNT AVE 185,277.16 463.19 $ 1,390 $ 1,853 $ 2,316 B18-0183 108 MAGNOLIA ST 180,776.00 451.94 $ 1,356 $ 1,808 $ 2,260 B17-0471 307 ELM ST A 179,960.00 449.90 $ 1,350 $ 1,800 $ 2,250 B17-0363 140 DUBOIS ST B 176,640.36 441.60 $ 1,325 $ 1,766 $ 2,208 B18-0247 113 PLATEAU AVE 170,280.00 425.70 $ 1,277 $ 1,703 $ 2,129 B17-0248 101 SETON WAY 167,750.76 419.38 $ 1,258 $ 1,678 $ 2,097 B17-0298 338 FREDERICK ST 165,498.90 413.75 $ 1,241 $ 1,655 $ 2,069 B17-0606 425 FAIR AVE 162,979.48 407.45 $ 1,222 $ 1,630 $ 2,037 B16-0400 122 FAIRMOUNT AVE 177,198.44 405.09 $ 1,329 $ 1,772 $ 2,215 B17-0669 211 AUBURN AVE 158,528.64 396.32 $ 1,189 $ 1,585 $ 1,982 B16-0686 122 TAYLOR ST 154,115.00 385.29 $ 1,156 $ 1,541 $ 1,926 B17-0648 1101 PACIFIC AVE D 149,698.80 374.25 $ 1,123 $ 1,497 $ 1,871 B17-0318 111 LAGUNA ST 148,748.76 371.87 $ 1,116 $ 1,487 $ 1,859 B17-0489 335 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 157,366.72 369.10 $ 1,180 $ 1,574 $ 1,967 B17-0673 515 FAIR AVE 145,804.32 364.51 $ 1,094 $ 1,458 $ 1,823 B17-0640 314 FREDERICK ST 145,794.08 364.49 $ 1,093 $ 1,458 $ 1,822 B16-0272 544 WEST CLIFF DR 145,710.97 364.28 $ 1,093 $ 1,457 $ 1,821 B18-0049 2656 MISSION ST 145,000.00 362.50 $ 1,088 $ 1,450 $ 1,813 B17-0214 222 COLUMBIA ST 141,530.40 353.83 $ 1,061 $ 1,415 $ 1,769 B17-0215 707 PELTON AVE 141,530.40 353.83 $ 1,061 $ 1,415 $ 1,769 B18-0221 740 FRONT ST 110 140,236.80 350.59 $ 1,052 $ 1,402 $ 1,753 B17-0519 339 ALTA VISTA DR 139,700.00 349.25 $ 1,048 $ 1,397 $ 1,746 B18-0120 402 ARROYO SECO 139,279.72 348.20 $ 1,045 $ 1,393 $ 1,741 B18-0266 330 OXFORD WAY 137,407.64 343.52 $ 1,031 $ 1,374 $ 1,718 B16-0657 142 LIBERTY ST 136,858.18 342.15 $ 1,026 $ 1,369 $ 1,711 B17-0341 140 AVERITT ST 135,922.56 339.81 $ 1,019 $ 1,359 $ 1,699 B17-0487 1325 LAUREL ST A 135,402.14 338.51 $ 1,016 $ 1,354 $ 1,693 B17-0452 1306 MISSION ST 134,505.00 336.26 $ 1,009 $ 1,345 $ 1,681 B16-0626 113 MCCORNICK ST 133,540.00 333.85 $ 1,002 $ 1,335 $ 1,669 B18-0150 216 TREVETHAN AVE 133,443.20 333.61 $ 1,001 $ 1,334 $ 1,668 B17-0523 1028 WESTERN DR 133,407.12 333.52 $ 1,001 $ 1,334 $ 1,668 B18-0232 312 BUENA VISTA AVE 130,841.16 327.10 $ 981 $ 1,308 $ 1,636 B18-0115 225 BROOKSIDE AVE 130,730.02 326.83 $ 980 $ 1,307 $ 1,634 B16-0518 813 N BRANCIFORTE AVE 130,000.00 325.00 $ 975 $ 1,300 $ 1,625 B16-0561 120 BELVEDERE TER 129,877.84 324.69 $ 974 $ 1,299 $ 1,623 B17-0097 730 OCEAN ST 128,058.00 320.15 $ 960 $ 1,281 $ 1,601 B17-0498 1210 OCEAN ST 126,825.30 317.06 $ 951 $ 1,268 $ 1,585 B16-0583 714 THIRD ST 127,780.16 316.59 $ 958 $ 1,278 $ 1,597 B16-0046 129 GLENWOOD AVE A 126,430.00 316.08 $ 948 $ 1,264 $ 1,580 B17-0210 1310 WEST CLIFF DR 124,484.72 311.21 $ 934 $ 1,245 $ 1,556 B17-0309 539 PALM ST 118,910.00 297.28 $ 892 $ 1,189 $ 1,486 B17-0238 1406 WEST CLIFF DR 117,480.00 293.70 $ 881 $ 1,175 $ 1,469 B17-0505 150 DUBOIS ST B 114,900.00 287.25 $ 862 $ 1,149 $ 1,436 B18-0124 116 ANDERSON ST 113,960.00 284.90 $ 855 $ 1,140 $ 1,425 B17-0509 125 BEACH ST 113,881.60 284.70 $ 854 $ 1,139 $ 1,424 B061475 1107 ESCALONA DR 112,966.42 283.00 $ 847 $ 1,130 $ 1,412 B18-0125 125 COWELL ST 112,750.00 281.88 $ 846 $ 1,128 $ 1,409 B17-0331 116 KENNETH ST 111,375.60 278.44 $ 835 $ 1,114 $ 1,392 B16-0675 121 CAMPBELL ST 110,398.80 276.00 $ 828 $ 1,104 $ 1,380 EST17-0042 809 CENTER ST 206 110,000.00 275.00 $ 825 $ 1,100 $ 1,375 B17-0575 303 LINDEN ST 109,630.00 274.08 $ 822 $ 1,096 $ 1,370 B17-0375 710 PELTON AVE 109,560.00 273.90 $ 822 $ 1,096 $ 1,370 B18-0053 123 JORDAN ST 108,680.00 271.70 $ 815 $ 1,087 $ 1,359 B18-0271 129 ALTA AVE 106,700.00 266.75 $ 800 $ 1,067 $ 1,334 B17-0680 106 CRESTVIEW TER 105,600.00 264.00 $ 792 $ 1,056 $ 1,320 B17-0433 1614 MISSION ST 105,379.60 263.45 $ 790 $ 1,054 $ 1,317 B16-0475 130 SCENIC ST 104,631.60 261.58 $ 785 $ 1,046 $ 1,308 B16-0457 215 CALEDONIA ST 104,500.00 261.25 $ 784 $ 1,045 $ 1,306 B16-0684 316 PELTON AVE 102,614.12 256.54 $ 770 $ 1,026 $ 1,283 B16-0673 121 CAMPBELL ST A 101,598.80 254.00 $ 762 $ 1,016 $ 1,270 B17-0195 1515 KING ST 101,582.48 253.96 $ 762 $ 1,016 $ 1,270 B17-0568 440 FREDERICK ST 101,159.52 252.90 $ 759 $ 1,012 $ 1,264 B17-0144 430 PACHECO AVE 100,840.60 252.10 $ 756 $ 1,008 $ 1,261 B17-0221 110 COOPER ST FL 4 100,000.00 250.00 $ 750 $ 1,000 $ 1,250 B17-0476 329 TRESCONY ST A 99,660.00 249.15 $ 747 $ 997 $ 1,246 B16-0682 111 MCCORNICK ST 99,000.00 247.50 $ 743 $ 990 $ 1,238 B17-0556 415 WINDSOR ST 97,900.00 244.75 $ 734 $ 979 $ 1,224 B15-0472 232 OCEAN VIEW AVE 97,478.20 243.70 $ 731 $ 975 $ 1,218 B17-0393 413 SAN JUAN AVE A 97,049.60 242.62 $ 728 $ 970 $ 1,213 B17-0612 347 CORAL ST 96,659.70 241.6527.44 $ 725 $ 967 $ 1,208
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY18
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation,
$50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0075 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.01 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
482 TOTAL PERMITS $84,806,173.75 $207,704.62 $ 511,171 $ 648,228 $ 785,286 B17-0494 104 RIVER ST 92,780.00 231.95 $ 696 $ 928 $ 1,160 B17-0670 714 WINDHAM ST 91,520.00 228.80 $ 686 $ 915 $ 1,144 B17-0379 1130 MISSION ST 91,193.00 227.98 $ 684 $ 912 $ 1,140 B17-0700 2841 MISSION ST 91,000.00 227.50 $ 683 $ 910 $ 1,138 B17-0266 212 TREVETHAN AVE 87,500.80 218.75 $ 656 $ 875 $ 1,094 B17-0362 1226 SEABRIGHT AVE 108,900.00 217.25 $ 817 $ 1,089 $ 1,361 B17-0147 250 MOORE ST 86,240.00 215.60 $ 647 $ 862 $ 1,078 B18-0185 839 WALNUT AVE 86,131.98 215.33 $ 646 $ 861 $ 1,077 B17-0423 140 FRONT ST 85,463.12 213.66 $ 641 $ 855 $ 1,068 B18-0179 332 MORRISSEY BLVD 83,724.80 209.31 $ 628 $ 837 $ 1,047 G17-0005 304 TANNER HEIGHTS DR 82,777.00 206.94 $ 621 $ 828 $ 1,035 B17-0643 231 ALTA AVE 82,656.00 206.64 $ 620 $ 827 $ 1,033 B16-0534 1011 FAIR AVE 82,340.52 205.85 $ 618 $ 823 $ 1,029 B17-0326 155 NATIONAL ST 82,188.88 205.47 $ 616 $ 822 $ 1,027 B17-0430 120 FERNSIDE ST 81,290.00 203.23 $ 610 $ 813 $ 1,016 B17-0588 41 GRANDVIEW ST COMMON 80,000.00 200.00 $ 600 $ 800 $ 1,000 B17-0589 41 GRANDVIEW ST COMMON 80,000.00 200.00 $ 600 $ 800 $ 1,000 B17-0590 41 GRANDVIEW ST COMMON 80,000.00 200.00 $ 600 $ 800 $ 1,000 B18-0099 1011 DELAWARE AVE 79,200.00 198.00 $ 594 $ 792 $ 990 B16-0411 126 CLINTON ST 79,200.00 198.00 $ 594 $ 792 $ 990 B17-0288 140 SYLVANIA AVE 79,185.25 197.96 $ 594 $ 792 $ 990 B17-0469 119 MADRONE ST 79,154.40 197.89 $ 594 $ 792 $ 989 B17-0650 151 LADERA DR 78,925.00 197.31 $ 592 $ 789 $ 987 B17-0357 519 DUFOUR ST 78,852.80 197.13 $ 591 $ 789 $ 986 B18-0147 525 PALM ST 77,192.08 192.98 $ 579 $ 772 $ 965 B17-0417 340 MYRTLE ST 76,098.00 190.25 $ 571 $ 761 $ 951 B16-0544 503 CALEDONIA ST 75,820.00 189.55 $ 569 $ 758 $ 948 B18-0254 189 HOLLYWOOD AVE 74,800.00 187.00 $ 561 $ 748 $ 935 B18-0204 230 SEAVIEW AVE 74,360.00 185.90 $ 558 $ 744 $ 930 B17-0125 105 ESMERALDA DR 73,731.62 184.33 $ 553 $ 737 $ 922 B17-0665 416 CALEDONIA ST 73,040.00 182.60 $ 548 $ 730 $ 913 B18-0135 319 YOUNGLOVE AVE 69,960.00 174.90 $ 525 $ 700 $ 875 B17-0449 301 CENTER ST 69,706.00 174.27 $ 523 $ 697 $ 871 B17-0269 319 STANFORD AVE 69,561.40 173.90 $ 522 $ 696 $ 870 B17-0431 137 SOUTHAMPTON LN A 68,533.00 171.33 $ 514 $ 685 $ 857 B17-0198 814 WINDSOR ST 66,721.60 166.80 $ 500 $ 667 $ 834 B17-0165 175 WEST CLIFF DR 32,933.70 164.66 $ 247 $ 329 $ 412 B18-0102 103 PARK AVE 65,510.64 163.78 $ 491 $ 655 $ 819 B18-0296 106 CARBONERA DR 65,390.14 163.48 $ 490 $ 654 $ 817 B18-0146 321 MAIN ST 65,340.00 163.35 $ 490 $ 653 $ 817 B16-0265 414 OLIVE ST 65,053.56 162.63 $ 488 $ 651 $ 813 B17-0249 218 CHICO AVE 64,790.00 161.98 $ 486 $ 648 $ 810 B18-0047 702 PARK WAY 61,168.02 161.17 $ 459 $ 612 $ 765 B16-0651 139 CATALPA ST 63,814.80 159.54 $ 479 $ 638 $ 798 B17-0387 165 DUBOIS ST 63,769.50 159.42 $ 478 $ 638 $ 797 B17-0532 139 AVERITT ST 63,688.80 159.22 $ 478 $ 637 $ 796 B17-0289 140 ECHO ST 63,580.00 158.95 $ 477 $ 636 $ 795 B17-0666 120 CEDAR ST 63,387.50 158.47 $ 475 $ 634 $ 792 B18-0223 140 INGALLS ST 63,243.50 158.11 $ 474 $ 632 $ 791 B17-0336 111 GRANT ST 63,030.00 157.58 $ 473 $ 630 $ 788 B17-0364 112 ALAMO AVE 62,700.00 156.75 $ 470 $ 627 $ 784 B17-0265 1322 RIVER ST 62,324.04 155.81 $ 467 $ 623 $ 779 B17-0329 520 MAPLE ST 62,266.74 155.67 $ 467 $ 623 $ 778 B18-0065 104 RENO WAY 62,000.00 155.00 $ 465 $ 620 $ 775 B17-0690 1001 OCEAN ST 20 61,632.00 154.08 $ 462 $ 616 $ 770 B18-0212 110 PINE PL 1 61,600.00 154.00 $ 462 $ 616 $ 770 B18-0213 110 PINE PL 3 61,600.00 154.00 $ 462 $ 616 $ 770 B17-0222 2025 SOQUEL AVE 61,564.56 153.91 $ 462 $ 616 $ 770 B17-0350 144 DELACOSTA AVE 60,280.00 150.70 $ 452 $ 603 $ 754 B17-0569 411 WOODROW AVE 59,442.88 148.61 $ 446 $ 594 $ 743 B17-0698 75 RIVER ST 59,225.00 148.06 $ 444 $ 592 $ 740 B17-0272 138 STONEY CREEK RD 59,000.00 147.50 $ 443 $ 590 $ 738 B18-0062 212 LADERA CT 58,673.28 146.68 $ 440 $ 587 $ 733 B17-0493 214 KING ST 58,500.00 146.25 $ 439 $ 585 $ 731 B17-0366 114 LENNOX ST 56,182.62 140.46 $ 421 $ 562 $ 702 B17-0193 739 ESCALONA DR 55,985.80 139.96 $ 420 $ 560 $ 700 B17-0604 126 CLINTON ST 55,651.88 139.13 $ 417 $ 557 $ 696 B18-0197 711 PACIFIC AVE 54,893.05 137.23 $ 412 $ 549 $ 686 B16-0105 1100 FAIR AVE 53,111.70 132.78 $ 398 $ 531 $ 664 B17-0077 120 RATHBURN WAY 52,827.68 132.07 $ 396 $ 528 $ 660 B17-0413 550 SECOND ST 52,800.00 132.0027.45 $ 396 $ 528 $ 660
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY18
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation,
$50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0075 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.01 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
482 TOTAL PERMITS $84,806,173.75 $207,704.62 $ 511,171 $ 648,228 $ 785,286 B18-0050 204 UNION ST 52,457.04 131.14 $ 393 $ 525 $ 656 B18-0138 119 LAURENT ST 52,085.00 130.21 $ 391 $ 521 $ 651 B17-0211 831 WALNUT AVE 51,133.28 127.83 $ 383 $ 511 $ 639 B18-0225 1102 PACIFIC AVE 51,055.00 127.64 $ 383 $ 511 $ 638 B17-0662 135 LIBERTY ST 50,600.00 126.50 $ 380 $ 506 $ 633 B17-0609 109 LEE ST 50,041.20 125.10 $ 375 $ 500 $ 626
B17-0610 132 BENITO AVE 50,000.00 125.00 $ 375 $ 500 $ 625 B17-0416 150 MERCED AVE 49,741.44 124.35 $ 373 $ 497 $ 622 B17-0263 137 GRUNEWALD CT 49,170.00 122.93 $ 369 $ 492 $ 615 B17-0422 124 CONTINENTAL ST 48,770.00 121.93 $ 366 $ 488 $ 610 B17-0200 117 HANDLEY ST 48,400.00 121.00 $ 363 $ 484 $ 605 B17-0668 116 MARKET ST 47,833.60 119.58 $ 359 $ 478 $ 598 B17-0521 1200 PACIFIC AVE 47,522.00 118.81 $ 356 $ 475 $ 594 B17-0246 123 LENNOX ST 46,912.96 117.28 $ 352 $ 469 $ 586 B17-0297 732 RIVERSIDE AVE 46,750.00 116.88 $ 351 $ 468 $ 584 B17-0483 220 LEIBRANDT AVE 45,000.00 112.50 $ 338 $ 450 $ 563 B17-0292 111 HIGHLAND AVE 45,000.00 112.50 $ 338 $ 450 $ 563 B17-0294 504 LOGAN ST 44,880.00 112.20 $ 337 $ 449 $ 561 B16-0425 109 ALHAMBRA AVE 44,000.00 110.00 $ 330 $ 440 $ 550 B18-0283 223 CALIFORNIA ST 43,230.00 108.08 $ 324 $ 432 $ 540 B17-0158 220 SYLVANIA AVE 43,142.40 107.86 $ 324 $ 431 $ 539 B17-0308 140 SWIFT ST 42,348.64 105.87 $ 318 $ 423 $ 529 B17-0499 740 FRONT ST 380 42,130.00 105.33 $ 316 $ 421 $ 527 B17-0299 1242 WEST CLIFF DR 41,690.00 104.23 $ 313 $ 417 $ 521 B18-0200 121 CAMINO DEL SOL 41,690.00 104.23 $ 313 $ 417 $ 521 B17-0695 924 SEASIDE ST 41,426.88 103.57 $ 311 $ 414 $ 518 B17-0369 342 OCEAN ST 41,149.30 102.87 $ 309 $ 411 $ 514 B17-0500 144 SAN JUAN AVE 40,920.00 102.30 $ 307 $ 409 $ 512 B17-0137 231 EVERGREEN ST 40,336.24 100.84 $ 303 $ 403 $ 504 B18-0187 111 MISSION ST 40,215.00 100.54 $ 302 $ 402 $ 503 B17-0027 400 BEACH ST 40,000.00 100.00 $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 B18-0171 400 BEACH ST 40,000.00 100.00 $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 B18-0222 157 FRANKLIN ST 38,737.50 96.84 $ 291 $ 387 $ 484 B17-0399 328 INGALLS ST D 38,714.62 96.79 $ 290 $ 387 $ 484 B18-0194 123 BURTON DR 38,500.00 96.25 $ 289 $ 385 $ 481 B18-0100 116 FRANCIS CT 38,060.00 95.15 $ 285 $ 381 $ 476 B18-0141 1307 DELAWARE AVE 37,400.00 93.50 $ 281 $ 374 $ 468 B18-0136 404 ESCALONA DR 36,850.00 92.13 $ 276 $ 369 $ 461 B17-0538 203 RAVENSWOOD CT 36,550.00 91.38 $ 274 $ 366 $ 457 B17-0677 1430 LAUREL ST 36,549.88 91.37 $ 274 $ 365 $ 457 B18-0104 121 HUGUS AVE 36,500.00 91.25 $ 274 $ 365 $ 456 B17-0270 709 SPRING ST 36,080.00 90.20 $ 271 $ 361 $ 451 B18-0112 214 HIGHLAND AVE 68,996.20 89.47 $ 517 $ 690 $ 862 B17-0687 139 ROONEY ST 34,930.16 87.33 $ 262 $ 349 $ 437 B17-0517 539 ISBEL DR 34,320.00 85.80 $ 257 $ 343 $ 429 B18-0334 336 FREDERICK ST 33,769.84 84.42 $ 253 $ 338 $ 422 B17-0641 0 LORAN ST CMN 32,949.52 82.37 $ 247 $ 329 $ 412 B17-0242 729 BAY ST 32,812.80 82.03 $ 246 $ 328 $ 410
B18-0116 30 BELLA ROSE TER 32,010.00 80.03 $ 240 $ 320 $ 400 B18-0117 1143 EAST CLIFF DR 103,650.88 78.65 $ 777 $ 1,037 $ 1,296 B17-0495 118 2ND AVE 31,349.76 78.37 $ 235 $ 313 $ 392
B18-0208 1601 DELAWARE AVE 31,172.16 77.93 $ 234 $ 312 $ 390 B18-0211 218 PLATEAU AVE 31,000.00 77.50 $ 233 $ 310 $ 388 B18-0262 148 PACHECO AVE 30,980.00 77.45 $ 232 $ 310 $ 387 B17-0383 514 ISBEL DR 30,915.10 77.29 $ 232 $ 309 $ 386 B17-0620 435 LOGAN ST 30,800.00 77.00 $ 231 $ 308 $ 385 B17-0011 1424 N BRANCIFORTE AVE 30,625.28 76.56 $ 230 $ 306 $ 383 B17-0601 1046 WEST CLIFF DR 30,146.76 75.37 $ 226 $ 301 $ 377 B17-0161 407 BROADWAY 30,000.00 75.00 $ 225 $ 300 $ 375 B17-0458 115 CORAL ST B 30,000.00 75.00 $ 225 $ 300 $ 375 B18-0163 423 HIGHLAND AVE 30,000.00 75.00 $ 225 $ 300 $ 375 B17-0658 140 AVERITT ST 29,380.00 73.45 $ 220 $ 294 $ 367 B18-0259 212 WALK CIR 29,150.00 72.88 $ 219 $ 292 $ 364 B16-0454 113 BERKELEY WAY 29,132.70 72.83 $ 218 $ 291 $ 364 B17-0376 710 PELTON AVE 28,916.28 72.29 $ 217 $ 289 $ 361 B17-0550 322 ESCALONA DR 28,710.00 71.78 $ 215 $ 287 $ 359 B18-0069 225 BUENA VISTA AVE 27,769.98 69.43 $ 208 $ 278 $ 347 B18-0394 115 BERKELEY WAY 27,090.96 67.73 $ 203 $ 271 $ 339 B17-0302 118 ANNIE LN 26,620.00 66.55 $ 200 $ 266 $ 333 B18-0027 550 WATER ST L2 26,427.00 66.07 $ 198 $ 264 $ 330 B18-0144 512 CENTENNIAL ST 26,180.00 65.4527.46 $ 196 $ 262 $ 327
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY18
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation,
$50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0075 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.01 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
482 TOTAL PERMITS $84,806,173.75 $207,704.62 $ 511,171 $ 648,228 $ 785,286 B18-0156 84 BLACKBURN ST 100 26,000.00 65.00 $ 195 $ 260 $ 325 B18-0157 84 BLACKBURN ST 100 26,000.00 65.00 $ 195 $ 260 $ 325 B18-0158 84 BLACKBURN ST 100 26,000.00 65.00 $ 195 $ 260 $ 325 B17-0394 117 PHELAN CT 25,850.00 64.63 $ 194 $ 259 $ 323 B17-0396 924 WEST CLIFF DR 25,300.00 63.25 $ 190 $ 253 $ 316 B17-0304 711 WESTERN DR 25,274.70 63.19 $ 190 $ 253 $ 316 B18-0159 1534 PACIFIC AVE 25,000.00 62.50 $ 188 $ 250 $ 313 B17-0441 2611 MISSION ST 25,000.00 62.50 $ 188 $ 250 $ 313 B18-0210 200 BUTTON ST 25,000.00 62.50 $ 188 $ 250 $ 313 B17-0333 146 ENCINAL ST 24,756.98 61.89 $ 186 $ 248 $ 309 B18-0354 678 SPRING ST 24,640.00 61.60 $ 185 $ 246 $ 308 B18-0276 208 KALKAR DR 24,640.00 61.60 $ 185 $ 246 $ 308 B18-0188 227 YOUNGLOVE AVE 24,035.00 60.09 $ 180 $ 240 $ 300 B17-0435 422 RIGG ST 23,760.00 59.40 $ 178 $ 238 $ 297
B17-0339 137 GLENWOOD AVE 23,650.00 59.13 $ 177 $ 237 $ 296 E17-0190 555 SOQUEL AVE 23,500.00 58.75 $ 176 $ 235 $ 294 B18-0152 716 POPLAR AVE 23,465.00 58.66 $ 176 $ 235 $ 293 B17-0258 905 PROSPECT HTS 23,400.00 58.50 $ 176 $ 234 $ 293 B17-0485 1016 WEST CLIFF DR 23,345.40 58.36 $ 175 $ 233 $ 292 B18-0336 117 MOORE CREEK RD 23,210.00 58.03 $ 174 $ 232 $ 290 B17-0624 329 TRESCONY ST B 23,100.00 57.75 $ 173 $ 231 $ 289 B17-0623 1029 ESCALONA DR 23,100.00 57.75 $ 173 $ 231 $ 289 B17-0530 226 CAYUGA ST 23,100.00 57.75 $ 173 $ 231 $ 289 B17-0057 324 MAIN ST 22,313.22 55.78 $ 167 $ 223 $ 279
B17-0637 323 BROADWAY E2 22,220.00 55.55 $ 167 $ 222 $ 278 B17-0322 745 OCEAN ST 22,000.00 55.00 $ 165 $ 220 $ 275 B17-0453 628 ESCALONA DR 22,000.00 55.00 $ 165 $ 220 $ 275 B18-0005 312 KING ST 22,000.00 55.00 $ 165 $ 220 $ 275
B18-0314 209 MOTT AVE 22,000.00 55.00 $ 165 $ 220 $ 275 B17-0415 339 WALNUT AVE 21,670.00 54.18 $ 163 $ 217 $ 271 B18-0009 251 HIGH ST J 21,215.54 53.04 $ 159 $ 212 $ 265 B18-0010 251 HIGH ST B 21,215.54 53.04 $ 159 $ 212 $ 265 B17-0418 340 MYRTLE ST 21,054.88 52.64 $ 158 $ 211 $ 263 B17-0524 101 FELIX ST 21,000.00 52.50 $ 158 $ 210 $ 263 B18-0176 360 MOORE ST 20,570.00 51.43 $ 154 $ 206 $ 257 B18-0140 211 STOCKTON AVE 20,460.00 51.15 $ 153 $ 205 $ 256 B18-0038 101 CHURCH ST 20,299.00 50.75 $ 152 $ 203 $ 254 B14-0519 400 BEACH ST 20,000.00 50.00 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250 B16-0652 500 OCEAN ST 20,000.00 50.00 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250 B18-0273 111 CENTENNIAL ST 20,000.00 50.00 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250 B18-0265 740 FRONT ST 20,000.00 50.00 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250 B18-0058 1520 PACIFIC AVE 19,920.00 49.80 $ 149 $ 199 $ 249 B17-0428 234 WOODS ST 19,800.00 49.50 $ 149 $ 198 $ 248 B17-0644 131 MASON ST 19,687.68 49.22 $ 148 $ 197 $ 246 B17-0636 210 CHACE ST 19,140.00 47.85 $ 144 $ 191 $ 239 B17-0508 1346 RIVER ST 1 18,870.72 47.18 $ 142 $ 189 $ 236 B16-0330 1406 ESCALONA DR 18,656.28 46.64 $ 140 $ 187 $ 233 B18-0068 347 FAIRMOUNT AVE 18,260.00 45.65 $ 137 $ 183 $ 228 B18-0343 321 OXFORD WAY 18,040.00 45.10 $ 135 $ 180 $ 226 B17-0219 335 RIGG ST 18,012.96 45.03 $ 135 $ 180 $ 225
B17-0385 308 CYPRESS AVE 18,000.00 45.00 $ 135 $ 180 $ 225 B17-0512 1003 PROSPECT HTS 18,000.00 45.00 $ 135 $ 180 $ 225 B17-0534 1411 BROADWAY 18,000.00 45.00 $ 135 $ 180 $ 225 B17-0126 119 CARDIFF CT 17,873.22 44.68 $ 134 $ 179 $ 223 B18-0037 907 CEDAR ST 17,426.50 43.57 $ 131 $ 174 $ 218 B18-0238 249 GETCHELL ST 17,000.00 42.50 $ 128 $ 170 $ 213 B17-0635 127 OCEAN ST 8 16,800.00 42.00 $ 126 $ 168 $ 210 B17-0113 423 GRANT ST 16,600.00 41.50 $ 125 $ 166 $ 208 B18-0233 1224 ESCALONA DR 16,461.00 41.15 $ 123 $ 165 $ 206 B18-0016 244 SHELDON AVE 15,840.00 39.60 $ 119 $ 158 $ 198 B17-0597 720 WATER ST D 15,620.00 39.05 $ 117 $ 156 $ 195 B18-0195 220 SYLVANIA AVE 15,313.00 38.28 $ 115 $ 153 $ 191 B16-0636 615 SEABRIGHT AVE 15,290.00 38.23 $ 115 $ 153 $ 191 B17-0199 151 LADERA DR 15,039.20 37.60 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B17-0351 511 DUFOUR ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B17-0377 411 WOODROW AVE 22,920.00 37.50 $ 172 $ 229 $ 287 B17-0681 602 LAUREL ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B18-0031 805 OCEAN ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B18-0127 740 FRONT ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B18-0270 425 LINDEN ST 15,000.00 37.50 $ 113 $ 150 $ 188 B17-0603 228 OCEAN VIEW AVE 14,838.46 37.1027.47 $ 111 $ 148 $ 185
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY18
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation,
$50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0075 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.01 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
482 TOTAL PERMITS $84,806,173.75 $207,704.62 $ 511,171 $ 648,228 $ 785,286 B17-0607 425 FAIR AVE 14,697.40 36.74 $ 110 $ 147 $ 184 B18-0224 422 PARK WAY 14,300.00 35.75 $ 107 $ 143 $ 179 B18-0039 119 HEATHER CT 13,939.38 34.85 $ 105 $ 139 $ 174 B17-0419 101 HIAWATHA AVE 1 13,860.00 34.65 $ 104 $ 139 $ 173 B17-0565 136 ALAMO AVE 13,759.90 34.40 $ 103 $ 138 $ 172 B17-0450 230 ALTA VISTA DR 13,652.68 34.13 $ 102 $ 137 $ 171 B17-0502 2111 MISSION ST 13,633.20 34.08 $ 102 $ 136 $ 170 B18-0304 1551 PACIFIC AVE 13,500.00 33.75 $ 101 $ 135 $ 169 B17-0608 723 FREDERICK ST 13,402.50 33.51 $ 101 $ 134 $ 168 B17-0397 1124 KING ST 13,280.00 33.20 $ 100 $ 133 $ 166 B18-0001 1804 MISSION ST 204 13,185.62 32.96 $ 99 $ 132 $ 165 B17-0615 136 MORRISSEY BLVD 13,125.12 32.81 $ 98 $ 131 $ 164 B18-0151 328 MAIN ST 14 13,090.00 32.73 $ 98 $ 131 $ 164 B17-0627 1901 MISSION ST 13,000.00 32.50 $ 98 $ 130 $ 163 B18-0060 740 FRONT ST 380 13,000.00 32.50 $ 98 $ 130 $ 163 B17-0231 175 WEST CLIFF DR 12,962.86 32.41 $ 97 $ 130 $ 162 B17-0361 411 WOODROW AVE 12,866.40 32.17 $ 96 $ 129 $ 161 B17-0459 1121 SOQUEL AVE 12,734.75 31.84 $ 96 $ 127 $ 159 B17-0571 530 S BRANCIFORTE AVE 12,304.80 30.76 $ 92 $ 123 $ 154 B17-0682 1319 OCEAN ST 12,000.00 30.00 $ 90 $ 120 $ 150 B17-0404 218 GOSS AVE 11,880.00 29.70 $ 89 $ 119 $ 149
B18-0033 519 BELLEVUE ST 11,880.00 29.70 $ 89 $ 119 $ 149 B17-0579 340 ALTA VISTA DR 11,579.76 28.95 $ 87 $ 116 $ 145 B17-0464 208 SEABORG PL 11,440.00 28.60 $ 86 $ 114 $ 143 B18-0278 326 COLUMBIA ST 10,471.82 26.18 $ 79 $ 105 $ 131 B17-0628 127 OCEAN ST 1 10,200.00 25.50 $ 77 $ 102 $ 128 B17-0629 127 OCEAN ST 2 10,200.00 25.50 $ 77 $ 102 $ 128 B17-0630 127 OCEAN ST 3 10,200.00 25.50 $ 77 $ 102 $ 128 B16-0629 627 SEABRIGHT AVE 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B17-0398 1314 OCEAN ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B17-0374 302 OCEAN VIEW AVE 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B17-0507 234 MARKET ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B17-0655 520 WESTERN DR 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B17-0647 1420 BROADWAY 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B18-0190 123 ALAMO AVE 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B17-0529 1314 OCEAN ST 1B 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B18-0153 111 MADRONE ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B18-0130 1001 RIVER ST 10,000.00 25.00 $ 75 $ 100 $ 125 B17-0409 255 VISTA BELLA DR 9,900.00 24.75 $ 74 $ 99 $ 124 B18-0316 250 RIVER ST 9,783.00 24.46 $ 73 $ 98 $ 122
B18-0216 247 WALK CIR 5,400.00 24.00 $ 41 $ 54 $ 68
B17-0539 163 PEACH TER 9,500.00 23.75 $ 71 $ 95 $ 119
B18-0192 147 CLAREMONT TER 9,487.50 23.72 $ 71 $ 95 $ 119 B17-0701 515 FAIR AVE 9,405.00 23.51 $ 71 $ 94 $ 118
B17-0632 127 OCEAN ST 5 9,300.00 23.25 $ 70 $ 93 $ 116
B17-0633 127 OCEAN ST 6 9,300.00 23.25 $ 70 $ 93 $ 116
B17-0634 127 OCEAN ST 7 9,300.00 23.25 $ 70 $ 93 $ 116
B17-0201 120 RULOFSON ST 9,240.00 23.10 $ 69 $ 92 $ 116 B17-0465 201 QUARRY LN 9,130.00 22.83 $ 68 $ 91 $ 114
B17-0381 228 OXFORD WAY 9,000.00 22.50 $ 68 $ 90 $ 113
B17-0478 114 MAPLE ST TO 116 9,000.00 22.50 $ 68 $ 90 $ 113 B18-0235 1000 WESTERN DR 8,899.26 22.25 $ 67 $ 89 $ 111 B17-0370 337 STANFORD AVE 8,800.00 22.00 $ 66 $ 88 $ 110 B17-0573 204 CENTER ST 8,800.00 22.00 $ 66 $ 88 $ 110
B17-0566 224 OCEAN ST 8,800.00 22.00 $ 66 $ 88 $ 110
B17-0691 200 WEST CLIFF DR 19 8,800.00 22.00 $ 66 $ 88 $ 110 M17-0057 110 COOPER ST FL 5 8,500.00 21.25 $ 64 $ 85 $ 106 B16-0176 1705 SOQUEL AVE 8,203.20 20.51 $ 62 $ 82 $ 103 B18-0131 131 SOUTHAMPTON LN C 8,000.00 20.00 $ 60 $ 80 $ 100 B17-0472 919 SUMNER ST 7,793.04 19.48 $ 58 $ 78 $ 97
B17-0466 223 CHURCH ST 7,500.00 18.75 $ 56 $ 75 $ 94
B18-0256 69 ROONEY ST 7,400.00 18.50 $ 56 $ 74 $ 93
B17-0638 301 ARROYO SECO 7,040.00 17.60 $ 53 $ 70 $ 88
B17-0445 502 MAPLE ST 8,041.50 17.60 $ 60 $ 80 $ 101
B17-0446 504 MAPLE ST 8,041.50 17.60 $ 60 $ 80 $ 101
B17-0447 507 MAPLE ST 8,041.50 17.60 $ 60 $ 80 $ 101
B17-0448 509 MAPLE ST 8,041.50 17.60 $ 60 $ 80 $ 101
B18-0122 1318 OCEAN ST 7,000.00 17.50 $ 53 $ 70 $ 88
B17-0477 100 PIONEER ST E 6,606.75 16.52 $ 50 $ 66 $ 83 B17-0616 410 FREDERICK ST 6,562.56 16.41 $ 49 $ 66 $ 82 B17-0645 1717 MISSION ST 6,500.00 16.2527.48 $ 49 $ 65 $ 81
GREEN BUILDING REVENUES
VARYING RATES
FY18
Permit NumberAddress Valuation Fee Paid (.0025 x
Valuation,
$50,000 CAP)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0075 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.01 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
EXPECTED REVENUE AT
NEW RATE
(If projects were similar to
FY18) (.0125 x Valuation,
$50,000 cap)
482 TOTAL PERMITS $84,806,173.75 $207,704.62 $ 511,171 $ 648,228 $ 785,286 B17-0496 1411 PACIFIC AVE 6,500.00 16.25 $ 49 $ 65 $ 81 B18-0107 841 ALMAR AVE B 6,500.00 16.25 $ 49 $ 65 $ 81
B17-0440 228 2ND AVE 6,160.00 15.40 $ 46 $ 62 $ 77
B17-0062 815 OCEAN ST 6,000.00 15.00 $ 45 $ 60 $ 75
B17-0619 210 CHACE ST 6,000.00 15.00 $ 45 $ 60 $ 75
B18-0026 166 RANKIN ST 6,000.00 15.00 $ 45 $ 60 $ 75
B17-0546 303 BEACH ST 6,000.00 15.00 $ 45 $ 60 $ 75
B18-0161 329 TRESCONY ST C 6,000.00 15.00 $ 45 $ 60 $ 75 B18-0290 214 KING ST 6,000.00 15.00 $ 45 $ 60 $ 75
B17-0697 607 MIRAMAR DR 5,940.00 14.85 $ 45 $ 59 $ 74
B17-0454 240 OCEAN VIEW AVE 5,800.00 14.50 $ 44 $ 58 $ 73 B17-0652 224 SUNSET AVE 5,673.88 14.18 $ 43 $ 57 $ 71
B17-0564 1547 PACIFIC AVE 5,500.00 13.75 $ 41 $ 55 $ 69 B17-0639 722 MODESTO AVE 5,500.00 13.75 $ 41 $ 55 $ 69
B17-0642 200 WEST CLIFF DR 22 5,500.00 13.75 $ 41 $ 55 $ 69 B18-0313 925 FAIR AVE 5,500.00 13.75 $ 41 $ 55 $ 69
B17-0455 1516 SOQUEL AVE 5,500.00 13.75 $ 41 $ 55 $ 69
B17-0631 127 OCEAN ST 4 5,400.00 13.50 $ 41 $ 54 $ 68
B18-0046 550 WATER ST 5,341.00 13.35 $ 40 $ 53 $ 67
B17-0432 210 PEARL ST D 5,003.60 12.51 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B17-0678 165 DUBOIS ST 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B18-0034 309 BEACH ST 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B18-0035 313 BEACH ST 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B17-0683 367 OCEAN ST 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B18-0186 600 OCEAN ST 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B18-0269 824 MISSION ST 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B18-0275 719 SWIFT ST 65 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63
B17-0570 41 MUNICIPAL WHARF 5,000.00 12.50 $ 38 $ 50 $ 63 B17-0654 139 MERCED AVE 4,400.00 11.00 $ 33 $ 44 $ 55
B18-0109 322 HIGHLAND AVE 4,400.00 11.00 $ 33 $ 44 $ 55 B17-0518 1209 PACIFIC AVE 4,320.00 10.80 $ 32 $ 43 $ 54 B17-0408 221 CATHCART ST 4,211.12 10.53 $ 32 $ 42 $ 53
B18-0110 1002 SOQUEL AVE 4,000.00 10.00 $ 30 $ 40 $ 50
B17-0271 219 RIGG ST 3,960.00 9.90 $ 30 $ 40 $ 50
B17-0605 117 WALTI ST 3,574.00 8.94 $ 27 $ 36 $ 45
B18-0019 108 TORRY PINE TER 3,574.20 8.94 $ 27 $ 36 $ 45 B18-0330 1102 PACIFIC AVE 3,500.00 8.75 $ 26 $ 35 $ 44
B18-0240 125 OAK WAY 2,751.98 6.88 $ 21 $ 28 $ 34
B17-0467 122 ANITA ST 2,500.00 6.25 $ 19 $ 25 $ 31
B16-0692 121 CLARK AVE 2,500.00 6.25 $ 19 $ 25 $ 31
B18-0331 1306 PACIFIC AVE 2,500.00 6.25 $ 19 $ 25 $ 31
B17-0599 2161 DELAWARE AVE 2,298.00 5.75 $ 17 $ 23 $ 29 B17-0460 131 LINDEN ST 2,000.00 5.00 $ 15 $ 20 $ 25
B18-0327 109 QUARRY LN 1,980.00 4.95 $ 15 $ 20 $ 25
B17-0167 503 LAGUNA ST 1,709.00 4.27 $ 13 $ 17 $ 21
B17-0470 112 LINDEN ST 1,650.00 4.13 $ 12 $ 17 $ 21
B17-0622 110 COOPER ST 100A 1,500.00 3.75 $ 11 $ 15 $ 19 B17-0140 35 PACIFIC AVE 1,500.00 3.75 $ 11 $ 15 $ 19
B18-0249 142 SHELTER LAGOON DR 7,040.00 3.54 $ 53 $ 70 $ 88 B18-0277 100 NANNA CT 1,400.00 3.50 $ 11 $ 14 $ 18
B18-0272 338 WILKES CIR 1,320.00 3.30 $ 10 $ 13 $ 17
B17-0548 135 CATALPA ST 1,143.68 2.86 $ 9 $ 11 $ 14
B17-0675 1143 EAST CLIFF DR 1,000.00 2.50 $ 8 $ 10 $ 13 B18-0002 1804 MISSION ST 304 1,000.00 2.50 $ 8 $ 10 $ 13 B17-0392 161 BELMONT ST 990.00 2.48 $ 7 $ 10 $ 12
B17-0689 303 POTRERO ST 43-106 500.00 1.25 $ 4 $ 5 $ 6
27.49 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Garrett <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2022 9:03 PM
To: City Council
Subject: 4.12.22 Agenda Item #27 Green Building Fee Increases
4.12.22 Agenda Item #27 Green Building Fee Increases
It doesn't take a math wizard to see this is a HUGE increase in fees. I can see more staff will be hired, but nowhere does it actually state the benefit of such actions.
Green building regulation is regulation. You need to almost double the fees to do what more exactly? I note with dismay a change to allow the city to council to increase fees at whim without public approval of a codification change.
POWER MONEY HUNGRY ARE YOU? (yoda would say)
Education fund you say. (yoda again) Does regulation require education? Only notice and debate, not a double of expenses.
Very strange this. Bumping the budget I see any way possible. Bigger government, lots of people on the payroll.
Garrett Philipp - Westside
27.50 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Ron Pomerantz <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 12:48 PM
To: City Council
Subject: April 12, 2022 Council Agenda item #27: Green Building Program Proposed Fee Increase (PL)
Re April 12, 2022 Council Agenda item #27: Green Building Program Proposed Fee Increase (PL) Good afternoon Mayor and Councilmembers.
The Green Building Program is essential to meet our Climate Action Plan goals. Keeping housing development fees as low as possible is another objective. With this in mind the proposed increases appear somewhat high based on past practices. These new rates are a big jump. Can they be phased in? The Planning Commission approved the 1% fee based on the project’s value and the $50K cap removed. The cap has been put back in without the Planning Commission’s review and approval. Why was this done and by whom? Shouldn’t the Planning Commission review and weigh-in on such a significant change. A 3/4% seems more than adequate especially if the cap is removed. A 1/2% fee may be adequate by removing the cap. The $50K cap would benefit any project over $5M with a 1% fee basis. With $100M developments looming a $50K cap would reduce the development’s fee obligation some $950K. Clearly such a low cap would significantly subsidize these large developments by smaller, less well funded projects. Where’s the issue of fairness and equity?
I’d encourage the Council to send this issue back to the Planning commission for their review. If there’s a time factor make sure the Planning Commission’s approval of removing the $50K cap is part of the Council motion. Also consider a 3/4% fee on a test basis and/or phasing in fee increases over time.
Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration.
Ron Pomerantz
27.51 Planning and Community Development
City Council
April 12, 2022
Green Building
Program Proposed
Fee Increase
27.52 2
Green Building Program Adopted by City
Council in October 2005
• Established a Green Building Education Fee (GBF) to support program cost, codified as 0.0025 of project valuation and later included a cap of $50,000
• Promotes environmental sustainability, including incentives for:
Waste Reduction Energy Efficiency Water Conservation
27.53 3
Green Building Program Overview
• Applies to most new construction
o Residential additions & remodels >350 sq. ft.
o Non-residential additions & remodels >1,000 sq. ft.
o Various other exceptions
• Permit applicants choose from checklist of Green Building measures o Each measure has assigned point value
o Need minimum number of points for receipt of building permit o Compliance measured by total points applicants selected o Building inspectors verify points
• Residential & non-residential (mixed use)
o Each use is considered separately
27.54 4
Fee levels the same since 2005, need to bridge
funding gaps for staffing & program costs
Deficits
• Revenue for FY 2019-21 did
not meet program expenses
• Deficit expected for FY 2022
• Current fund balance will not
support FY 2023 needs
Adjustments Needed
• Increasing baseline percentage
of select staff time
• Adding new staff to capture
true cost
• Adjusting service supply costs
FY 2021 Budget – Baseline
Personnel
As of FY 2022 Costs
$305,335
Services & Supplies
As of FY 2021 Budget
$46,285
Program Costs $351,620
FY 23 Budget – Proposed
Personnel $460,159
Services & Supplies $159,897
Projected $620,056
27.55 5
Fund 108 – Analysis of Surplus/Deficit from
FY 2016 to FY 2022
-$100,000
-$80,000
-$60,000
-$40,000
-$20,000
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22
27.56 6
Fee Comparison of Current vs. Proposed –
Examples by Development Type
New Residential
Development Type
Valuation
Estimates
Fee Paid at
Existing
GBF at 0.25%
(0.0025 x Valuation,
50,000 cap)
Fee Paid at
Proposed
GBF at 1%
(0.01 x Valuation,
50,000 cap)
650 sq. ft. Accessory
Dwelling Unit
$143,000 $358 $1,430
1,600 sq. ft. single
family home
$352,000 $880 $3,520
10 unit project $1,431,000 Total $3,578
Per Unit $358
Total $14,310
Per Unit $1,431
27.57 7
Next Steps
Approval of Recommendations
• First Reading today
• Second reading on April 26th
• Fee effective 60 days later
Future Program Considerations
• Potential future changes, e.g., existing building electrification • Adjust fee based on future analysis by modification of fee by resolution
• Ensure program is fiscally sustainable & cost recovery
27.58 8
Recommendation
Motion to:
1) Introduce for publication an amendment to Chapter 24.15, (Green Building Regulations), to specify that the fee associated with the Green Building Educational Resource Fund will be established by resolution of the City Council; and 2) Adopt a resolution to increase the Green Building Fee from 0.0025 to 0.0100 times the overall valuation of a project, to retain the $50,000 fee cap, and to incorporate said fee increase into the City Unified Master Fee Schedule with a footnote that annual Consumer Price Index increases do not apply to the fee; and
3) Direct staff to update all associated fee schedules, such as user-friendly fee schedules developed by staff and post them online, where applicable, for the public.
27.59 Questions
27.60 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
SUBJECT: Transportation and Public Works Commission (TPWC) Appointment (CC) RECOMMENDATION: This item is continued to the May 10, 2022 Council meeting.
28.1 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/04/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Annual Report (PR)
RECOMMENDATION: This item is continued to the April 26, 2022 Council meeting.
29.1 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: April 7, 2022
AGENDA OF: April 12, 2022
DEPARTMENT: City Attorney
SUBJECT: Public Gathering and Expression Events Ordinance Amendment (CA) RECOMMENDATION: Introduce for publication an ordinance amending City of Santa Cruz Municipal Code (“SCMC”) Chapter 10.65 – Public Gathering and Expression Events.
BACKGROUND: In January 2020, the role of Special Event Permit Coordinator transitioned from the City Manager’s Office to the Parks and Recreation Department. The position was subsequently eliminated in FY 2021 in response to the city budget crisis, and various department staff currently oversee the review and issuance of a variety of permits, namely: Major Public Special Events; Minor Public Events; Neighborhood Block Party; Public Gathering and Expression; and Filming.
In June of 2021, the City Council approved amendments to two municipal code chapters which outline the standards for the issuance of the following permits:
10.64 Public Major Special Events
10.65 Public Gathering and Expression Events
The June 2021 amendments to Chapters 10.64 and 10.65 were intended to ensure the ordinance and associated revenue for permit issuance fully reflected the transition of this role from the City Manager’s Office to the Parks and Recreation Department. Since that transition, the City Attorney’s Office has undertaken a more in-depth analysis of Chapter 10.65, which regulates public gatherings and expression events that, under established legal precedent, are entitled to protection under the First Amendment. The amendments proposed in the attached draft ordinance are intended to clarify and more closely align the City’s regulations with established legal precedent.
DISCUSSION: Under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, while the government is limited in its ability to regulate speech and the right of people to peaceably assemble, reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on public gathering and expression events are generally permissible so long as they are content-neutral.1 A content-neutral restriction is one which is based on something other than the content of the speech.2 1 Clark v. Cmty. For Creative Non-Violence, 468 U.S. 288, 293 (1984). 2 Long Beach Area Peace Network v. City of Long Beach, 574 F.3d 1011, 1024 (9th Cir. 2009).
30.1 A content neutral time, place, and manner regulation will generally be found to be permissible if the following four criteria are satisfied: (1) the government interest in adopting the regulation is substantial; (2) the regulation is narrowly tailored to meet that government interest; (3) the regulation leaves open ample alternatives for communication; and (4) the regulation does not confer “unbridled discretion” on the permitting official.3 Applying these standards, as further refined in case law, the draft ordinance proposes to amend Chapter 10.65 as follows:
1. Updating Section 10.65.030 – Violations to add subsection (g) clarifying that, in addition to infraction or misdemeanor citations, violations may be abated in accordance with remedies specified in SCMC Title 4 – General Municipal Code Enforcement.4
2. Simplifying the definition of “public gathering and expression” in Section 10.65.040(b).
3. Updating Section 10.65.050 and 10.65.060 to more clearly and narrowly define the types of events that require permits under the Ordinance.
4. Amending Section 10.65.070 – The previous exceptions listed were confusing to apply.
An exception was added for spontaneous events, which is required under First Amendment caselaw.
5. Amending Section 10.65.080 – Application to change the time period within which a permit application must be submitted before an event from five days to three business days.
6. Amending Section 10.65.100 – Minor modification of subsection (h) to remove outdated reference to Chapter 9.40 – Sound Amplification Equipment.
7. Changing heading of Section 10.65.150 to more accurately reflect its content.
8. Amending Section 10.65.190 – Grounds for Denial to reflect the change in deadline to apply for permit to match amendment to Section 10.65.080.
9. Amending Section 10.65.200 - Minor linguistic modification to clarify that a different permit is required under Section 10.64, if the event is a major public special event.
10. Amending Section 10.65.210 – Minor updates intended to remove subjective criteria and clarify the types of conditions that can be applied.
11. Amending Section 10.65.230 to clarify that appeals can be made to the Parks & Recreation Commission.
Health in All Policies.
Health in All Policies (HiAP) is a collaborative approach to improving the health of all people by incorporating health considerations into decision-making across sectors and policy areas. This approach is based on three pillars: equity, public health, and sustainability. HiAP aims to ensure 3 Long Beach, supra, 574 F.3d at 1024-25.
4 This is declarative of the current Municipal Code.
30.2 that decision-makers are informed about the health, equity, and sustainability impacts of various policy options during the policy development process. The ordinance amendments are consistent with the three pillars in that its purpose is to promote public safety and welfare, to provide the city with a minimum amount of time to logistically accommodate public gathering and expression events, to assure that the First Amendment rights of those who wish to peacefully participate in public gathering and expression events on city of Santa Cruz public property are preserved and protected, and to assure reasonable access to public property by other community members not involved in the event.
FISCAL IMPACT: No significant fiscal impact is anticipated as the proposed ordinance would not substantially modify the existing permit program for public gatherings and expression events.
Prepared By:
Cassie Bronson
Deputy City Attorney
Mary Haley Ousley
Deputy City Attorney
Submitted By:
Tony Condotti
City Attorney
Approved By:
Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Draft Ordinance Amending Chapter 10.65 – Public Gathering and Expression Events – track changes
2) Draft Ordinance Amending Chapter 10.65 – Public Gathering and Expression Events - clean
30.3 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-XX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ AMENDING SANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 10.65 - PUBLIC GATHERING AND
EXPRESSION EVENTS
WHEREAS, Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 10.65 regulates Public Gathering and Expression Events; and
WHEREAS, under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, the government may impose content-neutral, reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on public gathering and expression events; and
WHEREAS, content neutral time, place, and manner regulations will generally be found to be permissible if the following four criteria are satisfied: (1) the government interest in adopting the regulation is substantial; (2) the regulation is narrowly tailored to meet that government interest; (3) the regulation leaves open ample alternatives for communication; and (4) the regulation does not confer “unbridled discretion” on the permitting official; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney’s office, in collaboration with the Parks & Recreation Department which administers permits under Chapter 10.65, has reviewed Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 10.65 and recommends limited changes, in order to clarify and more closely align the City’s regulations with established legal precedent; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz as follows:
Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 10.65 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“10.65.010 TITLE.
This chapter shall be known as the city of Santa Cruz public gathering and expression events ordinance.
10.65.020 PURPOSE AND INTENT.
This chapter establishes the standards for the issuance of a permit for public gathering and expression events on public property in the city of Santa Cruz. Its purpose is to promote public safety and welfare, to provide the city with a minimum amount of time to logistically accommodate public gathering and expression events, to assure that the First Amendment rights of those who wish to peacefully participate in public gathering and expression events on city of Santa Cruz public property are preserved and protected, and to assure reasonable access to public property by other community members not involved in the event.
10.65.030 VIOLATIONS.
30.4 (a) It shall be an infraction for any person to conduct a public gathering and expression event, as defined in Section 10.65.050, unless a permit required under this chapter has been issued for the event.
(b) It shall be an infraction for any person to participate in a public gathering and expression event, as defined in Section 10.65.050, with the knowledge that a permit has not been issued for the event.
(c) It shall be an infraction for a public gathering and expression event permittee to willfully violate the terms and conditions of the event’s permit, or for any event participant to knowingly and willfully violate the terms or conditions of the permit. (d) It shall be an infraction for any person to hamper, interfere with, obstruct or impede any public gathering and expression event which has been permitted under this chapter. (e) When the public gathering and expression event permitted is a march on sidewalks, it shall be an infraction to knowingly drive any vehicle, including bicycles and skateboards, between the persons participating in the march unless it is done at the direction of a police officer, or an authorized security person or monitor.
(f) It shall be a misdemeanor for a public gathering and expression event participant to fail or refuse to comply with a revocation order made pursuant to Section 10.65.240, 10.65.270, or
10.65.280.
(g) Any violation of this Chapter, in addition to the penalties set forth in this section, is hereby declared a public nuisance and may be abated by any method authorized under Title 4 of this Code including, but not limited to, by civil injunction in accordance with Section 4.04.020.
10.65.040 DEFINITIONS.
As used in this chapter, the following terms and phrases shall have the following definitions:
(a) “Applicant” or “organizer” shall mean any person who, or organization which, seeks a public gathering and expression event permit to conduct, hold, plan, promote, produce, or sponsor an event governed by this chapter.
(b) “Public gathering and expression” means and denotes any political, civic, religious or other public activity intended primarily for the communication of ideas, as opposed to the generation of monetary profit by the applicant or participants of the event of a commercial nature, including the advertisement or promotion of products, goods or services. Fundraising and/or donations are permissible secondary objectives for a public gathering and expression event. Events which are primarily ventures for monetary profit and/or require a street closure are subject to Chapter
10.64..
30.5 (c) “Permittee” shall mean any person or organization issued a public gathering and expression event permit.
(d) “Sponsor” shall mean any person who, or organization which, furnishes some or all of the costs associated with a public gathering and expression event. An event sponsored or cosponsored by the city is not exempt from the provisions of this chapter. (e) “Permit officer” shall refer to the city employee designated by the director of parks and recreation.
(f) “Permit” shall refer to a public gathering and expression event permit. (g) “Event” shall refer to a public gathering and expression event. (h) “Director” shall refer to the director of parks and recreation, unless specified otherwise. (i) “Commission” shall refer to the parks and recreation commission. (j) “Secretary” shall refer to the secretary of the parks and recreation commission.
10.65.050 PUBLIC GATHERING AND EXPRESSION EVENT.
(a) Permits are generally not required for public gathering and expression events, except a permit issued pursuant to this chapter is required for public gathering and expression events thatis required for events that: As used in this chapter, a “public gathering and expression event,” consistent with the definition in Section 10.65.040, is a noncommercial public assembly, the primary purpose of which is the exercise of the participants’ constitutional rights of free speech and assembly:
(a) (1) Which isare scheduled to take place on public property; on a city sidewalk, alley or other right-of-way; within a city park, city beach, or other City-owned open space; and/or at a city facility; that and/or
(2) will last for more than an hour in duration; and
(3) meet at least one of the following criteria below. The event:
(b) Which isA) Is likely to obstruct, delay or interfere with the normal flow of vehicular or pedestrian traffic; and/or
(c) Which, dueB) Due to the crowd it generates, restricts access to or use of sidewalks, parks, beaches or other public areas; and/or
30.6 (d) Which will C) Will result in the placement of structures or objects on streets or, sidewalks, or other pedestrian walkways exceeding twelve square feet in size or six feet in height; and/or
(e) Which inmay result in donations for nonprofit organizations; and/or D) Is conducted on a regularly scheduled basis at a single location for more than two consecutive days per week; and/or
(f) Which E) Will have more than fifty participantsseventy-five participants; and/or
(g) Which may requiresF) Will require additional temporary toilet and sanitary facilities if such facilities already available will be inadequate to meet; and/or G) Will occupy areas that are marked as by reservation only in a city park, beach, or open space.
(H) Will occupy or negatively impact sensitive habitats of a city park, beach, or open space.
(I) Event organizers and attendees will occupy more than twenty-five percent of a usable area of a city park, beach, or open space.
(h) Which will be scheduled for longer than one hour; and/or (i)
(b) Displays and/or gatherings that are scheduled for longer than one day, which are scheduled overnight, or which require a street closure shall be governed by Chapter 10.64; and/or. (jc) Rallies and/or marches to be conducted on a city street rather than a city sidewalk require a street closure and are subject to the conditions of Chapter 10.64. (d) Events of a commercial nature, including the advertisement or promotion of products, goods, or services are subject to the conditions of Chapter 10.64.
10.65.060 Repealed. PERMIT REQUIRED.
Any person or organization intending to conduct a public gathering and expression event in the city of Santa Cruz shall first obtain a permit from the permit officer.
10.65.070 EXCEPTION FOR SPONTANEOUS EVENTS.
A permit is not required for the following events spontaneous events which are occasioned by news or affairs coming into public knowledge less than forty-eight hours prior to such event may be conducted in the City Hall courtyard or at the Town Clock without the organizers first having to obtain a permit. If practicable, the organizers should give notice to the permit officer at least
30.7 four hours prior to the event, informing the City of the date and time of the event and providing an estimate of the approximate number of persons who will be participating. Events which require advance planning such as recreation events, competition/contests/spectator sports, fairs, festivals, carnivals, ticketed events, sales/trade shows, recurring events, or events which require a permit from Building and Safety or the Fire Department for the placement of structures are not considered “spontaneous events” under this subsection.
(a) An event held exclusively within a city park: :
1) Which does not have the potential to cause or is not anticipated to cause an impact as described in Section 10.65.050. Although a permit under this chapter may not be needed, applications, reservations, fees, and other conditions may be required by the city’s parks and recreation department in order to use a city park, beach, facility, and/or other areas within the parks and recreation department’s jurisdiction.
2) The permit officer shall determine if the proposed event nonetheless has the potential to cause an impact such as that described in Section 10.65.050 to require a permit. The permit officer shall make this determination and inform the event organizer as soon as reasonably practicable from the time the permit officer is notified of the proposed event so as not to frustrate the purpose or timing of the event when time is of the essence. The permit officer may then require the event organizer to comply with the provisions of this chapter or to submit an application pursuant to Chapter 10.64.
(b) A public gathering and expression event which, in the estimation of the permit officer, and for which the event organizer makes the following guarantees to the satisfaction of the permit officer that the event:
1) Involves less than fifty participants;
2) Participants will assemble and/or march only on sidewalks; 3) Participants will cross streets only at crosswalks in units of twenty-five or less allowing vehicles to pass between each unit;
4) Participants will provide adult monitors who will assist in crossings as needed; 5) Participants will obey all traffic controls and regulations; 6) Participants will not obstruct sidewalks or otherwise impede the orderly flow of foot traffic on sidewalks;
7) Participants will not place structures or objects on sidewalks exceeding twelve square feet in size or six feet in height between sunset and sunrise; 8) Participants will obey all applicable laws, statutes and ordinances; 9) Participants will not obstruct necessary maintenance and cleaning of streets, sidewalks, or other public facilities;
10) Adequate toilet and sanitary facilities are available. If in the estimation of the permit officer toilet or sanitary facilities will be inadequate to meet the need for such facilities created by event participants, the organizer of the event shall meet with the city department responsible for the public facility where the event is to take place and reach
30.8 an agreement for the provision of additional temporary toilet and sanitary facilities, or otherwise provide for adequate facilities;
11) Any signage used will not be of such a dimension or used in such a manner that such signage may impede or obstruct pedestrians on sidewalks or vehicles on streets.(c) Any activity as defined in Chapter 5.81, typically known as street performers.
10.65.080 APPLICATION.
Any person desiring to conduct an event for which a permit is required pursuant to this chapter shall apply for a permit by filing a verified application with the permit officer on a form as approved by the director, which may be updated from time to time to comply with this chapter, city policies, and applicable rules. All applications shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of this chapter at least five three business days but not more than six months prior to the commencement date of the event. Applicable fees related to the event may be required in an amount established by the director consistent with the resolution and policy of the city council.
10.65.090 LATE APPLICATION.
Upon a showing of good cause, the permit officer shall consider a late application if there is sufficient time to process and investigate the application and possible impact on city services for the event. The permit officer shall make the determination of good cause and, in doing so, shall resolve all doubts in favor of allowing application to be made.
10.65.100 CONTENTS OF APPLICATION.
The event permit application may require the following information in addition to other information deemed necessary in the interest of public health, safety, and welfare:
(a) Name, address, home, mobile phone and business telephone numbers of the applicant and the person who will be present and in charge of the event; (b) If the event is to be sponsored by an organization, the name, address and telephone number of the organization and representative of the organization. If requested by the permit officer, written authorization to apply for the permit by an officer of the organization may also be required;
(c) Nature or purpose of the event;
(d) Date and estimated starting and ending time of the event; (e) Location of the event, including its boundaries, and/or assembly and disbanding locations for walks/marches;
30.9 (f) Estimated number of participants in the event; (g) Type and estimated number of vehicles or structures which will be used at the event and information as to whether there will be sponsor-provided water or emergency aid stations at the event;
(h) Description of any sound amplification equipment which will be used at the event. A sound amplification permit may entail payment of an associated fee, as required by Chapter 9.40; (i) Whether any food or beverages, including alcoholic beverages, will be sold at the event; (j) Whether monitors will be deployed at the event;
(k) Anticipated parking needed for participants, including accessible parking for disabled persons;
(l) Anticipated security and/or police requirements necessitated by the event; (m) Anticipated toilet and sanitary requirements necessitated by the event; (n) Anticipated road closures or barriers necessitated by the event; and (o) Additional information to comply with city rules, policies, and all other applicable local, state, and federal statutes and regulations.
10.65.110 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC GATHERING AND
EXPRESSION EVENTS OCCURRING ALONG A PLANNED ROUTE, AND/OR ENTAILING A MARCH OR A RALLY.
When the event is a rally and/or march on city sidewalks, the application shall contain the following information:
(a) The assembly point for the event and the time when participants will begin to assemble; (b) The proposed sidewalk route to be traveled;
(c) Material and maximum size of any signs or banners to be carried along the route; and (d) Anticipated number of adult monitors.
10.65.120 ACTION ON APPLICATION.
The city’s permit officer shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny an event permit application on the grounds specified in Section 10.65.190, and consistent with this chapter.
10.65.130 TIME FOR ACTION.
30.10 Action on the permit application shall be expeditious and in no case later than five business days after the permit officer receives a completed event application form. The maximum five business days action period may be extended by agreement between the applicant and the permit officer.
As used in this section the term “action” means approval, conditional approval, or denial of the permit.
10.65.140 CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS.
Prior to approving, conditionally approving or denying the permit application, the city’s permit officer shall consult with all city departments which may be impacted by the proposed event.
10.65.150 NOTIFICATION OF GROUNDS FOR DENIAL OR CONDITIONS.
If the permit officer decides to deny or conditionally approve the permit application, the permit officer shall inform the applicant in writing of the grounds for denial or the conditions of approval. The permit officer shall further inform the applicant of his or her right to appeal. This information shall be provided at the time of the decision. If the permit officer relied on information about the event other than that contained in the application, the permit officer shall inform the applicant of the additional information considered.
10.65.160 NOTICE OF INTENDED ACTION.
Prior to notifying the permit applicant of the action to be taken on the applicant’s permit, the permit officer shall advise the impacted departments or divisions or their designees, as necessary, of the intended action.
10.65.170 DENIAL OF LATE APPLICATION.
If the permit officer determines that good cause to consider a late application does not exist under Section 10.65.090, within two business days of receipt of the late application, the permit officer shall inform the applicant of the reason for the determination regarding lack of good cause and of the applicant’s right of appeal.
10.65.180 EXPEDITED ACTION ON APPLICATION.
The time limitations for action set forth in this chapter are not to be construed as absolute when time is of the essence. To that end, when it is apparent that the purpose of the demonstration would be frustrated if not conducted at or before a certain date and time, the permit officer, if possible, shall expedite the action required by this chapter so as to assure that the action is taken prior to the date and time of the proposed event.
10.65.190 GROUNDS FOR DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR A PUBLIC GATHERING AND EXPRESSION EVENT PERMIT.
30.11 An event permit application may be denied only if it is determined from a consideration of the application and other pertinent information that one or more of the following circumstances exist:
(a) The application was submitted less than five three business days prior to the event date; (b) Information contained in the application is found to be materially false or misleading; (c) The applicant failed to complete the application form after having been notified of the need to do so;
(d) The permit officer has already received an application for another event at the same time and place as that requested by the applicant, or is so close in time or proximity as to cause undue traffic congestion, and/or the police department or any other city department to be unable to meet the needs for services at both with the normal complement of staff; (e) The time, route, or size of the event is likely to substantially interrupt the safe and orderly movement of traffic in the vicinity of the event site or route, or to disrupt the use of a street at a time when it is usually subject to traffic congestion;
(f) The concentration of persons, vehicles and/or structures at the site of the event, or its assembly and disbanding areas, is reasonably likely to prevent proper police, fire, or ambulance service to areas in the vicinity of the event;
(g) The event is reasonably likely to require diversion of so many city police officers to ensure that participants stay within the boundaries or route of the event, or to protect participants and spectators, that normal protection to the rest of the city will be unreasonably compromised.
Nothing herein authorizes denial of a permit because of the need to protect participants from the conduct of others, if reasonable permit conditions can be imposed to allow for adequate protection of participants with the number of police officers normally assigned to the requested area;
(h) The location of the event is likely to substantially interfere with construction or maintenance work previously scheduled to take place upon or along city streets, or to interfere with the exercise of a previously granted encroachment permit; (i) The event is likely to occur at a time when a school is in session and at a route or location in the vicinity of a school, and the noise created by the event will substantially disrupt the educational activities of the school;
(j) The event will occur on a route or location in the vicinity of a hospital or extended care facility and the noise created by the event will substantially disrupt the operation of the hospital or extended care facility or disturb the patients within; (k) Event participants did not comply with conditions imposed in connection with similar prior events; or
30.12 (l) The event will conflict with an event permitted under Chapter 10.64.
In determining whether or not the permit application should be granted or denied, the permit officer shall resolve all doubts in favor of granting the application.
10.65.200 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL.
When the grounds for denial of an application for a permit can be obviated by altering the date, time, duration, route or location of the event, the permit officer, instead of denying the application, shall conditionally approve the application pursuant to Section 10.65.210. The city permit officer shall conditionally approve a permit application rather than deny the application whenever conditional approval is possible. Depending upon the time, place, and manner ofIf the event, the permit officer may request is a major public special event as defined by Chapter 10.64, the applicant will be required to apply for and obtain a permit under Chapter 10.64.
10.65.210 PERMIT CONDITIONS.
TheWhen necessary to protect the safety of persons or property, or to provide for adequate traffic control, or provide reasonable public access to or use of sidewalks, parks, beaches, or other public areas, the permit officer may condition the issuance of a permit by imposing reasonable requirements concerning the time, place, and manner of the event, any other requirements which are necessary to protect the safety of persons and property, and to provide for adequate traffic control.. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) AlterationReasonable alteration of the date, time, duration, route or location of the event; (b) When the event is a march, conditions pertaining to:
1) The area of participant assembly and disbanding;
2) Conditions concerning accommodation of pedestrian or vehicular traffic, including restricting the event to the sidewalk or designated public area, or allowing for intermittent safe traffic flow through an event site;
(c) Requirements for provision of first aid, sanitary or emergency facilities; (d) Requirements for use of event monitors and method for providing notice of permit conditions to event participants;
(e) Restrictions on the number or type of structures for fire safety as required by the Santa Cruz fire department;
(f) Requirements for use of garbage containers, cleanup and restoration of public property;
30.13 (g) Reasonable restrictions on the use of amplified sound necessary to achieve compliance with SCMC 9.40 and SCMC 9.36;
(h) Compliance with any other applicable ordinances or laws; (i) Restrictions on the service or sale of alcoholic beverages and any other edible or nonedible goods;
(j) Requirements for security personnel to be present when deemed necessary; and (k) Requirement for the applicant to provide advance written notification to those residents residing along the event route or within the immediate vicinity of the event, including notification of parking restrictions necessitated by the event.
10.65.220 PERMIT ISSUANCE.
The event permit shall be issued when:
(a) The application has been approved;
(b) The applicant has agreed in writing to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit; and
(c) All other applicable requirements of this chapter have been satisfied.
The permit is not assignable or transferable. The permit does not entitle the permittee to any vested property rights.
10.65.230 APPEAL PROCEDURE.
(a) To the Parks and Recreation Commission. Any applicant may appeal any decision or action taken pursuant to the authority of this chapter by the permit officer to the commission according to the following rules and regulations:
1) A written notice of appeal, together with the appropriate appeal fee as set by city council resolution, must be received by the secretary of the commission not later than ten calendar days following the date of the decision or action from which such appeal is being taken. If the final day for filing an appeal occurs on a weekend day or holiday, the final filing date shall be extended to the next following business day. 2) The appellant shall state the basis for the appeal and shall specifically cite the provision of this chapter which is relied upon to appeal the action or decision of the permit officer. The appeal must be signed by the appellant or appellant’s legal representative, and must set forth the mailing address to which the secretary of the commission may direct the notice of a hearing.
30.14 3) Upon receipt of the appeal the secretary of the commission shall schedule the matter for a public hearing at the next regularly scheduled business meeting, but not sooner than ten business days after receipt.
4) Notice of the public hearing shall be sent by first class mail to the permit applicant and appellant at least ten calendar days prior to the hearing. All notices shall include:
i. The time, place and date of the public hearing;
ii. A brief description of the matter to be considered including a concise description of the event in question, its location and public impacts being proposed;
iii. A brief description of the general procedure for submission of comments; iv. The date of the filing of the permit application and the name of the applicant. 5) The commission shall consider the appeal de novo at a hearing. The appellant shall bear the burden of proof to establish the basis for seeking a reversal of the action or decision by the permit officer.
6) The commission shall make findings of fact on which it bases its action. The commission may grant the appeal, including requiring conditions, mitigations, or modifications to the permit, or deny the appeal; or issue other appropriate decision or relief.
7) The decision of the commission shall be final unless appealed to the city council by the permit applicant or permittee under Chapter 1.16.
(b) To City Council. An applicant or permittee may appeal any decision or action taken pursuant to the authority of this chapter by the commission to the city council pursuant to Chapter 1.16. Members of the city council shall be exempt from the appeal fee specified in Chapter 1.16 when acting in their official capacity. The city council’s decision shall be final. (c) To City Manager. If there is insufficient time for a timely appeal to be heard by the parks and recreation commission or city council prior to the date on which the event is scheduled, the applicant may, at the applicant’s option, request that the city clerk schedule the appeal before the city manager. The city manager or designee shall hold a hearing no later than two business days prior to the time the event is scheduled to commence and will render a decision as soon as practicable and in no case later than the time the event is scheduled to commence. The city manager’s decision shall be final.
The time limitations set forth in this section are not to be construed as absolute when time is of the essence. To that end, when it is apparent that the purpose of the event would be frustrated if not conducted at a certain date and time, the director or city manager, if possible, shall expedite the appellate process so as to assure a ruling on the appeal prior to the date and time of the proposed event.
30.15 10.65.240 REVOCATION BY PERMIT OFFICER.
The permit officer may revoke a permit at any time if:
(a) An emergency arises making it impossible to assign sufficient or appropriate personnel to the event so as to assure public safety; or
(b) Information is obtained after the permit is issued from which it may be reasonably concluded that the permit should have been denied under Section 10.65.190.
10.65.250 REASONS FOR REVOCATION STATED.
If the permit officer revokes a permit the applicant shall be informed in writing of the grounds for revocation.
10.65.260 APPEAL OF PERMIT REVOCATION.
The applicant may appeal a revocation in the manner provided for in Section 10.65.230 in all cases except where the revocation is based on an emergency and there is insufficient time available to present or schedule an appeal.
10.65.270 REVOCATION DURING PUBLIC GATHERING AND EXPRESSION EVENT.
A police officer or city staff may revoke the event permit during the event if he or she finds either:
(a) That the event has deviated from or will deviate from its approved route or area; or (b) Event participants are violating the law or permit conditions. City staff shall not revoke the permit for either of these reasons unless the city staff first advises the participants of their route deviation, law violation or permit condition violation and provides them with an opportunity to correct same.
10.65.280 EMERGENCY REVOCATION.
A police officer or city staff may revoke an event permit during the event if fire or another emergency requires the event to be terminated to assure public safety. When a permit is revoked for this reason, all event participants must immediately comply with the city staff instructions.
10.65.290 DOUBTS RESOLVED AGAINST REVOCATION.
In determining whether or not a permit should be revoked, all doubts shall be resolved in favor of allowing the event to proceed.
10.65.300 COMPATIBILITY WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAW AND CONSTITUTIONS.
30.16 It is the intention of the city council and the people of the city of Santa Cruz that this chapter shall be interpreted in a manner compatible with the State of California Constitution and the United States Constitution and the statutory and decisional law of the state of California and the United States.
10.65.310 SEVERABILITY.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter. The city council hereby declares that it would have passed this chapter and every section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases might be declared unconstitutional or invalid.”
PASSED FOR PUBLICATION this ______ day of April 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
APPROVED: ______________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
PASSED FOR FINAL ADOPTION this _____ day of _______, 2022, by the following vote:
30.17 AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
APPROVED: ______________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
This is to certify that the above and foregoing document is the original of Ordinance No. 202x-xx and that it has been published or posted in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz. ________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
30.18 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-XX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ AMENDING SANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 10.65 - PUBLIC GATHERING AND
EXPRESSION EVENTS
WHEREAS, Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 10.65 regulates Public Gathering and Expression Events; and
WHEREAS, under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, the government may impose content-neutral, reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on public gathering and expression events; and
WHEREAS, content neutral time, place, and manner regulations will generally be found to be permissible if the following four criteria are satisfied: (1) the government interest in adopting the regulation is substantial; (2) the regulation is narrowly tailored to meet that government interest; (3) the regulation leaves open ample alternatives for communication; and (4) the regulation does not confer “unbridled discretion” on the permitting official; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney’s office, in collaboration with the Parks & Recreation Department which administers permits under Chapter 10.65, has reviewed Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 10.65 and recommends limited changes, in order to clarify and more closely align the City’s regulations with established legal precedent; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz as follows:
Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 10.65 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“10.65.010 TITLE.
This chapter shall be known as the city of Santa Cruz public gathering and expression events ordinance.
10.65.020 PURPOSE AND INTENT.
This chapter establishes the standards for the issuance of a permit for public gathering and expression events on public property in the city of Santa Cruz. Its purpose is to promote public safety and welfare, to provide the city with a minimum amount of time to logistically accommodate public gathering and expression events, to assure that the First Amendment rights of those who wish to peacefully participate in public gathering and expression events on city of Santa Cruz public property are preserved and protected, and to assure reasonable access to public property by other community members not involved in the event.
30.19 10.65.030 VIOLATIONS.
(a) It shall be an infraction for any person to conduct a public gathering and expression event, as defined in Section 10.65.050, unless a permit required under this chapter has been issued for the event.
(b) It shall be an infraction for any person to participate in a public gathering and expression event, as defined in Section 10.65.050, with the knowledge that a permit has not been issued for the event.
(c) It shall be an infraction for a public gathering and expression event permittee to willfully violate the terms and conditions of the event’s permit, or for any event participant to knowingly and willfully violate the terms or conditions of the permit. (d) It shall be an infraction for any person to hamper, interfere with, obstruct or impede any public gathering and expression event which has been permitted under this chapter. (e) When the public gathering and expression event permitted is a march on sidewalks, it shall be an infraction to knowingly drive any vehicle, including bicycles and skateboards, between the persons participating in the march unless it is done at the direction of a police officer, or an authorized security person or monitor.
(f) It shall be a misdemeanor for a public gathering and expression event participant to fail or refuse to comply with a revocation order made pursuant to Section 10.65.240, 10.65.270, or
10.65.280.
(g) Any violation of this Chapter, in addition to the penalties set forth in this section, is hereby declared a public nuisance and may be abated by any method authorized under Title 4 of this Code including, but not limited to, by civil injunction in accordance with Section 4.04.020.
10.65.040 DEFINITIONS.
As used in this chapter, the following terms and phrases shall have the following definitions:
(a) “Applicant” or “organizer” shall mean any person who, or organization which, seeks a public gathering and expression event permit to conduct, hold, plan, promote, produce, or sponsor an event governed by this chapter.
(b) “Public gathering and expression” means and denotes any political, civic, religious or other public activity intended primarily for the communication of ideas.. (c) “Permittee” shall mean any person or organization issued a public gathering and expression event permit.
30.20 (d) “Sponsor” shall mean any person who, or organization which, furnishes some or all of the costs associated with a public gathering and expression event. An event sponsored or cosponsored by the city is not exempt from the provisions of this chapter. (e) “Permit officer” shall refer to the city employee designated by the director of parks and recreation.
(f) “Permit” shall refer to a public gathering and expression event permit. (g) “Event” shall refer to a public gathering and expression event. (h) “Director” shall refer to the director of parks and recreation, unless specified otherwise. (i) “Commission” shall refer to the parks and recreation commission. (j) “Secretary” shall refer to the secretary of the parks and recreation commission.
10.65.050 PUBLIC GATHERING AND EXPRESSION EVENT.
(a) Permits are generally not required for public gathering and expression events, except a permit issued pursuant to this chapter is required for public gathering and expression events that:
(1) are scheduled to take place on public property; on a city sidewalk, alley or other right-of-way; within a city park, city beach, or other City-owned open space; and/or at a city facility;
(2) will last for more than an hour in duration; and
(3) meet at least one of the following criteria below. The event:
A) Is likely to obstruct, delay or interfere with the normal flow of vehicular or pedestrian traffic; and/or
B) Due to the crowd it generates, restricts access to or use of sidewalks, parks, beaches or other public areas; and/or
C) Will result in the placement of structures or objects on streets, sidewalks, or other pedestrian walkways exceeding twelve square feet in size or six feet in height; and/or
D) Is conducted on a regularly scheduled basis at a single location for more than two consecutive days per week; and/or
E) Will have more than seventy-five participants; and/or
30.21 F) Will require additional temporary toilet and sanitary facilities; and/or G) Will occupy areas that are marked as by reservation only in a city park, beach, or open space.
(H) Will occupy or negatively impact sensitive habitats of a city park, beach, or open space.
(I) Event organizers and attendees will occupy more than twenty-five percent of a usable area of a city park, beach, or open space.
(b) Displays and/or gatherings that are scheduled for longer than one day, which are scheduled overnight, or which require a street closure shall be governed by Chapter 10.64. (c) Rallies and/or marches to be conducted on a city street rather than a city sidewalk require a street closure and are subject to the conditions of Chapter 10.64. (d) Events of a commercial nature, including the advertisement or promotion of products, goods, or services are subject to the conditions of Chapter 10.64.
10.65.060 Repealed.
10.65.070 EXCEPTION FOR SPONTANEOUS EVENTS.
A permit is not required for spontaneous events which are occasioned by news or affairs coming into public knowledge less than forty-eight hours prior to such event may be conducted in the City Hall courtyard or at the Town Clock without the organizers first having to obtain a permit.
If practicable, the organizers should give notice to the permit officer at least four hours prior to the event, informing the City of the date and time of the event and providing an estimate of the approximate number of persons who will be participating. Events which require advance planning such as recreation events, competition/contests/spectator sports, fairs, festivals, carnivals, ticketed events, sales/trade shows, recurring events, or events which require a permit from Building and Safety or the Fire Department for the placement of structures are not considered “spontaneous events” under this subsection.
10.65.080 APPLICATION.
Any person desiring to conduct an event for which a permit is required pursuant to this chapter shall apply for a permit by filing a verified application with the permit officer on a form as approved by the director, which may be updated from time to time to comply with this chapter, city policies, and applicable rules. All applications shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of this chapter at least three business days but not more than six months prior to the commencement date of the event. Applicable fees related to the event may be required in an amount established by the director consistent with the resolution and policy of the city council.
30.22 10.65.090 LATE APPLICATION.
Upon a showing of good cause, the permit officer shall consider a late application if there is sufficient time to process and investigate the application and possible impact on city services for the event. The permit officer shall make the determination of good cause and, in doing so, shall resolve all doubts in favor of allowing application to be made.
10.65.100 CONTENTS OF APPLICATION.
The event permit application may require the following information in addition to other information deemed necessary in the interest of public health, safety, and welfare:
(a) Name, address, home, mobile phone and business telephone numbers of the applicant and the person who will be present and in charge of the event; (b) If the event is to be sponsored by an organization, the name, address and telephone number of the organization and representative of the organization. If requested by the permit officer, written authorization to apply for the permit by an officer of the organization may also be required;
(c) Nature or purpose of the event;
(d) Date and estimated starting and ending time of the event; (e) Location of the event, including its boundaries, and/or assembly and disbanding locations for walks/marches;
(f) Estimated number of participants in the event;
(g) Type and estimated number of vehicles or structures which will be used at the event and information as to whether there will be sponsor-provided water or emergency aid stations at the event;
(h) Description of any sound amplification equipment which will be used at the event; (i) Whether any food or beverages, including alcoholic beverages, will be sold at the event; (j) Whether monitors will be deployed at the event;
(k) Anticipated parking needed for participants, including accessible parking for disabled persons;
(l) Anticipated security and/or police requirements necessitated by the event; (m) Anticipated toilet and sanitary requirements necessitated by the event;
30.23 (n) Anticipated road closures or barriers necessitated by the event; and (o) Additional information to comply with city rules, policies, and all other applicable local, state, and federal statutes and regulations.
10.65.110 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC GATHERING AND
EXPRESSION EVENTS OCCURRING ALONG A PLANNED ROUTE, AND/OR ENTAILING A MARCH OR A RALLY.
When the event is a rally and/or march on city sidewalks, the application shall contain the following information:
(a) The assembly point for the event and the time when participants will begin to assemble; (b) The proposed sidewalk route to be traveled;
(c) Material and maximum size of any signs or banners to be carried along the route; and (d) Anticipated number of adult monitors.
10.65.120 ACTION ON APPLICATION.
The city’s permit officer shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny an event permit application on the grounds specified in Section 10.65.190, and consistent with this chapter.
10.65.130 TIME FOR ACTION.
Action on the permit application shall be expeditious and in no case later than five business days after the permit officer receives a completed event application form. The maximum five business days action period may be extended by agreement between the applicant and the permit officer.
As used in this section the term “action” means approval, conditional approval, or denial of the permit.
10.65.140 CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS.
Prior to approving, conditionally approving or denying the permit application, the city’s permit officer shall consult with all city departments which may be impacted by the proposed event.
10.65.150 NOTIFICATION OF GROUNDS FOR DENIAL OR CONDITIONS.
If the permit officer decides to deny or conditionally approve the permit application, the permit officer shall inform the applicant in writing of the grounds for denial or the conditions of approval. The permit officer shall further inform the applicant of his or her right to appeal. This information shall be provided at the time of the decision. If the permit officer relied on information about the event other than that contained in the application, the permit officer shall inform the applicant of the additional information considered.
30.24 10.65.160 NOTICE OF INTENDED ACTION.
Prior to notifying the permit applicant of the action to be taken on the applicant’s permit, the permit officer shall advise the impacted departments or divisions or their designees, as necessary, of the intended action.
10.65.170 DENIAL OF LATE APPLICATION.
If the permit officer determines that good cause to consider a late application does not exist under Section 10.65.090, within two business days of receipt of the late application, the permit officer shall inform the applicant of the reason for the determination regarding lack of good cause and of the applicant’s right of appeal.
10.65.180 EXPEDITED ACTION ON APPLICATION.
The time limitations for action set forth in this chapter are not to be construed as absolute when time is of the essence. To that end, when it is apparent that the purpose of the demonstration would be frustrated if not conducted at or before a certain date and time, the permit officer, if possible, shall expedite the action required by this chapter so as to assure that the action is taken prior to the date and time of the proposed event.
10.65.190 GROUNDS FOR DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR A PUBLIC GATHERING AND EXPRESSION EVENT PERMIT.
An event permit application may be denied only if it is determined from a consideration of the application and other pertinent information that one or more of the following circumstances exist:
(a) The application was submitted less than three business days prior to the event date; (b) Information contained in the application is found to be materially false or misleading; (c) The applicant failed to complete the application form after having been notified of the need to do so;
(d) The permit officer has already received an application for another event at the same time and place as that requested by the applicant, or is so close in time or proximity as to cause undue traffic congestion, and/or the police department or any other city department to be unable to meet the needs for services at both with the normal complement of staff; (e) The time, route, or size of the event is likely to substantially interrupt the safe and orderly movement of traffic in the vicinity of the event site or route, or to disrupt the use of a street at a time when it is usually subject to traffic congestion;
30.25 (f) The concentration of persons, vehicles and/or structures at the site of the event, or its assembly and disbanding areas, is reasonably likely to prevent proper police, fire, or ambulance service to areas in the vicinity of the event;
(g) The event is reasonably likely to require diversion of so many city police officers to ensure that participants stay within the boundaries or route of the event, or to protect participants and spectators, that normal protection to the rest of the city will be unreasonably compromised.
Nothing herein authorizes denial of a permit because of the need to protect participants from the conduct of others, if reasonable permit conditions can be imposed to allow for adequate protection of participants with the number of police officers normally assigned to the requested area;
(h) The location of the event is likely to substantially interfere with construction or maintenance work previously scheduled to take place upon or along city streets, or to interfere with the exercise of a previously granted encroachment permit; (i) The event is likely to occur at a time when a school is in session and at a route or location in the vicinity of a school, and the noise created by the event will substantially disrupt the educational activities of the school;
(j) The event will occur on a route or location in the vicinity of a hospital or extended care facility and the noise created by the event will substantially disrupt the operation of the hospital or extended care facility or disturb the patients within; (k) Event participants did not comply with conditions imposed in connection with similar prior events; or
(l) The event will conflict with an event permitted under Chapter 10.64.
In determining whether or not the permit application should be granted or denied, the permit officer shall resolve all doubts in favor of granting the application.
10.65.200 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL.
When the grounds for denial of an application for a permit can be obviated by altering the date, time, duration, route or location of the event, the permit officer, instead of denying the application, shall conditionally approve the application pursuant to Section 10.65.210. The city permit officer shall conditionally approve a permit application rather than deny the application whenever conditional approval is possible. If the event is a major public special event as defined by Chapter 10.64, the applicant will be required to apply for and obtain a permit under Chapter
10.64. 10.65.210 PERMIT CONDITIONS.
When necessary to protect the safety of persons or property, or to provide for adequate traffic control, or provide reasonable public access to or use of sidewalks, parks, beaches, or other
30.26 public areas, the permit officer may condition the issuance of a permit by imposing reasonable requirements concerning the time, place, and manner of the event. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) Reasonable alteration of the date, time, duration, route or location of the event; (b) When the event is a march, conditions pertaining to:
1) The area of participant assembly and disbanding;
2) Conditions concerning accommodation of pedestrian or vehicular traffic, including restricting the event to the sidewalk or designated public area, or allowing for intermittent safe traffic flow through an event site;
(c) Requirements for provision of first aid, sanitary or emergency facilities; (d) Requirements for use of event monitors and method for providing notice of permit conditions to event participants;
(e) Restrictions on the number or type of structures;
(f) Requirements for use of garbage containers, cleanup and restoration of public property; (g) Reasonable restrictions on the use of amplified sound necessary to achieve compliance with SCMC 9.40 and SCMC 9.36;
(h) Compliance with any other applicable ordinances or laws; (i) Restrictions on the service or sale of alcoholic beverages and any other edible or nonedible goods;
(j) Requirements for security personnel to be present when deemed necessary; and (k) Requirement for the applicant to provide advance written notification to those residents residing along the event route or within the immediate vicinity of the event, including notification of parking restrictions necessitated by the event.
10.65.220 PERMIT ISSUANCE.
The event permit shall be issued when:
(a) The application has been approved;
(b) The applicant has agreed in writing to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit; and
30.27 (c) All other applicable requirements of this chapter have been satisfied.
The permit is not assignable or transferable. The permit does not entitle the permittee to any vested property rights.
10.65.230 APPEAL PROCEDURE.
(a) To the Parks and Recreation Commission. Any applicant may appeal any decision or action taken pursuant to the authority of this chapter by the permit officer to the commission according to the following rules and regulations:
1) A written notice of appeal, together with the appropriate appeal fee as set by city council resolution, must be received by the secretary of the commission not later than ten calendar days following the date of the decision or action from which such appeal is being taken. If the final day for filing an appeal occurs on a weekend day or holiday, the final filing date shall be extended to the next following business day. 2) The appellant shall state the basis for the appeal and shall specifically cite the provision of this chapter which is relied upon to appeal the action or decision of the permit officer. The appeal must be signed by the appellant or appellant’s legal representative, and must set forth the mailing address to which the secretary of the commission may direct the notice of a hearing.
3) Upon receipt of the appeal the secretary of the commission shall schedule the matter for a public hearing at the next regularly scheduled business meeting, but not sooner than ten business days after receipt.
4) Notice of the public hearing shall be sent by first class mail to the permit applicant and appellant at least ten calendar days prior to the hearing. All notices shall include:
i. The time, place and date of the public hearing;
ii. A brief description of the matter to be considered including a concise description of the event in question, its location and public impacts being proposed;
iii. A brief description of the general procedure for submission of comments; iv. The date of the filing of the permit application and the name of the applicant. 5) The commission shall consider the appeal de novo at a hearing. The appellant shall bear the burden of proof to establish the basis for seeking a reversal of the action or decision by the permit officer.
6) The commission shall make findings of fact on which it bases its action. The commission may grant the appeal, including requiring conditions, mitigations, or modifications to the permit, or deny the appeal; or issue other appropriate decision or relief.
30.28 7) The decision of the commission shall be final unless appealed to the city council by the permit applicant or permittee under Chapter 1.16.
(b) To City Council. An applicant or permittee may appeal any decision or action taken pursuant to the authority of this chapter by the commission to the city council pursuant to Chapter 1.16. Members of the city council shall be exempt from the appeal fee specified in Chapter 1.16 when acting in their official capacity. The city council’s decision shall be final. (c) To City Manager. If there is insufficient time for a timely appeal to be heard by the parks and recreation commission or city council prior to the date on which the event is scheduled, the applicant may, at the applicant’s option, request that the city clerk schedule the appeal before the city manager. The city manager or designee shall hold a hearing no later than two business days prior to the time the event is scheduled to commence and will render a decision as soon as practicable and in no case later than the time the event is scheduled to commence. The city manager’s decision shall be final.
The time limitations set forth in this section are not to be construed as absolute when time is of the essence. To that end, when it is apparent that the purpose of the event would be frustrated if not conducted at a certain date and time, the director or city manager, if possible, shall expedite the appellate process so as to assure a ruling on the appeal prior to the date and time of the proposed event.
10.65.240 REVOCATION BY PERMIT OFFICER.
The permit officer may revoke a permit at any time if:
(a) An emergency arises making it impossible to assign sufficient or appropriate personnel to the event so as to assure public safety; or
(b) Information is obtained after the permit is issued from which it may be reasonably concluded that the permit should have been denied under Section 10.65.190.
10.65.250 REASONS FOR REVOCATION STATED.
If the permit officer revokes a permit the applicant shall be informed in writing of the grounds for revocation.
10.65.260 APPEAL OF PERMIT REVOCATION.
The applicant may appeal a revocation in the manner provided for in Section 10.65.230 in all cases except where the revocation is based on an emergency and there is insufficient time available to present or schedule an appeal.
10.65.270 REVOCATION DURING PUBLIC GATHERING AND EXPRESSION EVENT.
A police officer or city staff may revoke the event permit during the event if he or she finds either:
30.29 (a) That the event has deviated from or will deviate from its approved route or area; or (b) Event participants are violating the law or permit conditions. City staff shall not revoke the permit for either of these reasons unless the city staff first advises the participants of their route deviation, law violation or permit condition violation and provides them with an opportunity to correct same.
10.65.280 EMERGENCY REVOCATION.
A police officer or city staff may revoke an event permit during the event if fire or another emergency requires the event to be terminated to assure public safety. When a permit is revoked for this reason, all event participants must immediately comply with the city staff instructions.
10.65.290 DOUBTS RESOLVED AGAINST REVOCATION.
In determining whether or not a permit should be revoked, all doubts shall be resolved in favor of allowing the event to proceed.
10.65.300 COMPATIBILITY WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAW AND CONSTITUTIONS.
It is the intention of the city council and the people of the city of Santa Cruz that this chapter shall be interpreted in a manner compatible with the State of California Constitution and the United States Constitution and the statutory and decisional law of the state of California and the United States.
10.65.310 SEVERABILITY.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter. The city council hereby declares that it would have passed this chapter and every section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases might be declared unconstitutional or invalid.”
PASSED FOR PUBLICATION this 12th day of April 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
30.30 APPROVED: ______________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
PASSED FOR FINAL ADOPTION this _____ day of _______, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
APPROVED: ______________________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
This is to certify that the above and
foregoing document is the original
of Ordinance No. 2022-XX and
that it has been published or posted
in accordance with the Charter of
the City of Santa Cruz.
________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
30.31 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Garrett <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2022 9:14 PM
To: City Council
Subject: 4.12.22 Agenda Item #30 Public Gathering
4.12.22 Agenda Item #30 Public Gathering
Dear Council,
I see a mere 9 months after passing an ordinance savaging the right to free speech requiring permits your city attorney has reviewed the ordinance and councils it should be changed as to not infringe on individual rights granted by the creator codified in the US constitution.
That's real "nice" of you. Really. I could say I told you so, and did at the time, but OH well.
That the people don't need the approval of government to express ideas in speech doesn't even need an ordinance.
Nope.
Never did and still don't.
Garrett Philipp
30.32 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Peter Gelblum <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2022 4:45 PM
To: City Council; Bonnie Bush; Tony Condotti; Donna Meyers; Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson; Sonja Brunner; Sandy Brown; Renee Golder; Martine Watkins; Justin Cummings Subject: April 12 CC meeting, Agenda Item 30
Comments on proposed amendments to SCMC 10.65:
10.65.030(g): " Any violation of this Chapter, in addition to the penalties set forth in this section, is hereby declared a public nuisance and may be abated by any method authorized under Title 4 of this Code including, but not limited to, by civil injunction in accordance with Section 4.04.020." Contrary to the statement in footnote 4 of the Agenda Report aka Summary Sheet for this item, this addition is not "declarative of the current Municipal Code." SCMC section 4.04.020 simply says that violations of the code may be enjoined by a court. A court would have to first find that the violation constituted a public nuisance before issuing an injunction under section 4.04.020. This new section attempts to short circuit that process by declaring in advance that all violations of this Chapter are public nuisances. That determination should be left to a court,
10.65.040(b): The following sentence is important and should not be deleted: "Fundraising and/or donations are permissible secondary objectives for a public gathering and expression event."
10.65.050(a)(3)(D): What is the First Amendment justification for adding this new criterion for events that require a permit: " Is conducted on a regularly scheduled basis at a single location for more than two consecutive days per week"? It seems like a blatant attempt to target the public feedings by Food Not Bombs. Is there some other reason for adding it?
10.65.050(a)(3)(G) and (H) need "and/or" added at the end.
Thank you for your consideration,
Peter Gelblum
30.33 PUBLIC GATHERING
AND EXPRESSION
EVENTS
ORDINANCE
UPDATES Presented by Cassie Bronson, Atchison, Barisone & Condotti April 12, 2022
30.34 Public Gathering and Expression Events
• Events and activities primarily
intended for the communication of
ideas.
• Activities that the courts have
determined are entitled to a high
degree of First Amendment
protection.
• Examples: marches, rallies, political
demonstrations.
30.35 Rationale and Goals for Proposed Code Updates
• With the prior language, it was difficult to
determine when a permit was required.
• GOAL => Simplify language. Make sure
citizens and employees can easily determine
when a permit is required.
• By nature, this subject matter will require
updates from time to time, as First Amendment
caselaw develops and changes.
• GOAL => Make sure ordinance is in line with
latest First Amendment caselaw.
30.36 Specifics of the Proposed Update
Default is no permit is required for public gathering and expression events. (10.65.050(a)).
A permit will be required if specific criteria are met. E.g.: interference with traffic, access restricted to public areas, use of structures on public property, repeat events at the same location, more than 75 participants, certain impacts to parks, more toilets needed. (10.65.050(a)(3)).
Spontaneous events may be held at the City Hall Courtyard or Town Clock without a prior permit. (10.65.070.)
Option for enjoining violations of the chapter in court. (10.65.030(g)).
30.37 Response to Public Comment
• 10.65.030(g) – request that violations not be specifically identified as public nuisance.
• 10.65.040(b) – request to not delete a sentence about fundraising at public gathering and expression events.
• 10.65.050(a)(3)(D) – question about the rationale for this subsection • 10.65.050(a)(3)(G) and (H) need "and/or“ and the end. Agreed! Good catch, and thank you!
30.38 Thank you!
Questions or discussion?
30.39 City Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/05/2022
AGENDA OF: 04/12/2022
DEPARTMENT: Planning
SUBJECT: City Council Review of the Planning Commission’s Approval of the Coastal and Design Permits to Authorize the Development Associated with the Amended Municipal Code Pertaining to the Parking of Oversized Vehicles and to Implement City-wide Safe Parking Programs for Unhoused City Residents Living in Oversized Vehicles in the City of Santa Cruz (PL)
RECOMMENDATION: Resolution acknowledging the environmental determination and approving the Coastal Permit and Design Permit based on the findings listed in the draft resolution and the Conditions of Approval attached as Exhibit “A”.
BACKGROUND: On November 9, 2021, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2021-20 amending Santa Cruz Municipal Code (SCMC) Title 10 amending “Vehicles and Traffic” at Chapter 10.04 “Definitions” and Chapter 10.40 “Stopping, Standing and Parking” and Chapter
10.41 “City-Wide Parking Permit” pertaining to the parking of oversized vehicles and Chapter
16.19 “Storm Water and Urban Runoff Pollution Control” at Section 16.19.070.
The Council also approved a motion to direct staff to implement City-operated and sponsored safe parking programs for unhoused City residents living in oversized vehicles licensed and registered in the City of Santa Cruz. Council directed staff to return with draft-ready contracts and associated costs within four months of the passing of the ordinance. Safe parking programs would include a three-tiered approach that consists of the following:
a) Emergency overnight safe parking on City-owned parcels for a minimum of three vehicles to be implemented immediately. (This has been implemented.) b) Safe overnight parking on City-owned parcels or other non-residential approved spaces for a minimum of thirty vehicles throughout the City to be implemented within four months of the passing of the above listed ordinance. (The initial pilot for this has been implemented, and capacity will be expanded in the near future.) c) A robust safe parking program in partnership with service providers, health providers, and County partners. The following subpopulations will be prioritized:
Families with children; seniors; transition age youth; veterans; and those with a valid disabled placard or license plate issued pursuant to the California Vehicle Code. (Responses to a Request for Qualifications to conduct this work have been received and are being evaluated.)
31.1 Section 24.08.210 of the Zoning Ordinance requires approval of a Coastal Permit for “development” within the Coastal Zone that is not specifically exempted. This ordinance revision is defined in the Local Coastal Plan (LCP) as “development” because it could change the intensity of the use of the ocean or access thereto through the modified parking regulations, and parking restrictions are not specifically exempted in the LCP. Section 24.08.410.9 of the Zoning Ordinance calls for approval of a Design Permit for public projects located in the Coastal Zone, and Section 24.08.410 calls for a Design Permit for projects where the applicant is a public agency over which the City can exercise land use controls. Thus, the Design Permit can authorize safe parking locations on public and private properties inside and outside the Coastal Zone. Arguably, the use of parking lots for safe parking purposes would not trigger a Design Permit, as safe parking is essentially the intended and planned use of the property – parking.
However, some locations could call for a Design Permit for such uses based on locationalspecific requirements, such as a parks plan. The Design Permit and Coastal Permit considered herein are intentionally structured broadly so that they can cover a variety of circumstances where such permits may be necessary for implementation of the ordinance or the associated safe parking facilities.
On January 5, 2022, the Zoning Administrator heard this item and was notified by a member of the public that one of the Zoom links was not functioning, and the item was continued to a special meeting on January 12, 2020. At the January 5th, hearing two people spoke to the item – one in favor and one opposed. Staff received nine comments with two in favor of the ordinance and the rest opposed. The January 12th hearing included eight speakers and 23 written comments in opposition. The minutes to those hearings and comments submitted are attached to the staff report. On January 12, 2022, the Zoning Administrator approved Coastal and Design Permits to authorize the development associated with the amended municipal code pertaining to the parking of oversized vehicles (e.g., parking signage, time of use restrictions, etc.) and to implement Citywide safe parking programs for unhoused City residents living in oversized vehicles. On January 14th, an appeal was filed by Reggie Meisler on behalf of Santa Cruz Cares, and the item was subsequently scheduled for the February 17th Planning Commission meeting. On January 25th, a second appeal was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which raised a number of issues that required more analysis than was originally envisioned following receipt of the first appeal.
Planning staff and the City Attorney’s office comprehensively addressed the various issues raised in both appeals, as discussed in the analysis section of the Planning Commission report (attached), with some information also included in the analysis section of this report. The appeal hearing was noticed in a one-eighth page newspaper advertisement in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the City 14 days prior to the scheduled February 17, 2022 Planning Commission hearing where it was continued to a time certain of March 3, 2022. On March 3, 2022, the Planning Commission heard this item at a noticed public hearing. Seventeen members of the public spoke to the item with a majority of speakers opposed. Commissioner Shiffrin recommended approval of the Coastal and Design Permits with numerous amendments to the conditions of approval, and the Commission voted 4-3 to approve the permits with the revised conditions.
Kevin Grigsby, in partnership with Santa Cruz Cares and HUFF (Homeless United for Friendship and Freedom), submitted a letter and expressed a desire to appeal the Planning Commission’s approval to the Council, however, he did not pay the appeal fee, and his appeal
31.2 was not acted upon. Although not a valid appeal, staff has responded to select points in his letter in the analysis section of this report.
On March 14, 2022, Councilmember Golder called this item up for review (see attached email) due to the feasibility of implementing the revised conditions of approval and their potential impact on the effectiveness of the ordinance and potential fiscal impacts. Section 24.04.175 of the Zoning Ordinance allows any city council member to call up for city council review the final action taken by the Planning Commission. All matters are heard by the City Council in their entirety (de novo) meaning that the applications are considered anew.
The City Council action for this item will be to consider all previous testimony and materials from the Zoning Administrator Hearings, the Planning Commission hearing, and to consider public comments at the City Council hearing and either approve, deny or continue the hearing on the Coastal and Design Permits to authorize the development associated with the amended municipal code pertaining to the parking of oversized vehicles and to implement City-wide safe parking programs for unhoused City residents living in oversized vehicles in the City of Santa Cruz.
Planning staff and the City Attorney’s office have addressed the amended conditions of approval in the discussion section of this report. The staff report and attachments that went to the Zoning Administrator and Planning Commission are attached to this staff report. That staff report contains a substantial amount of information related to the description and analysis of the project, including additional background information and analysis beyond what is contained in this report. Additional information is also contained in the findings included with the attached draft resolution of approval.
DISCUSSION: This section evaluates the statements in the letter from Kevin Grigsby and goes on to evaluate and make recommendations regarding the conditions of approval from the Planning Commission.
Kevin Grigsby Comments. Excerpts of Kevin Grigsby’s comments are evaluated in this section.
Kevin Grigsby, in partnership with Santa Cruz Cares and HUFF, states:
Similar to the issues noted in Robert Norse’s LCP analysis of 2016, OVO specifically limits public access to open space lands and the coastline to oversized vehicles, and thus violates all of the above goals which suggest “enhancement” and “maximization” of public access. As noted in provisions below, the OVO did not properly solicit public opinion from our unhoused neighbors living in vehicles in determining how the OVO serves their diverse set of needs and interests, thus violating PR2.1.1 and PR2.1.2.
In canvassing people living in oversized vehicles on Delaware Ave, neighborhood group Santa Cruz Cares has found that a significant portion of the population would be excluded from both receiving a permit, as well as qualifying for the large majority of safe parking vacancies that the city is promising to create, due to restrictions placed on vehicle registration, tags, and more.
The City has also undertaken extensive efforts to conduct research and engage community members, including those experiencing or having previously experienced homelessness, on the
31.3 topics of homelessness. In 2016 – 2017, the City Council appointed a Homelessness Coordinating Committee that researched and prepared recommendations related to homelessness (https://www.cityofsantacruz.com/home/showdocument?id=63292). The City Council established a Community Advisory Committee on Homelessness (CACH) in June of 2019 to engage with the community and consider various policy options related to homelessness. The CACH membership included people with a wide range of experience and knowledge, including a number of individuals who either were or had been unhoused. Over the course of a year, the CACH held approximately 16 public meetings1 and made a range of recommendations to the City Council, including expansion of parking capacity at faith-based parking lots, which the City Council subsequently approved. The CACH also had a number of subcommittees that met on a regular basis to explore certain topics in more detail.
These efforts have also been informed by substantial outreach and engagement led by the County of Santa Cruz on the topic of homelessness, including the 2015 “All-In Toward a Home for Every County Resident: The Santa Cruz County Community Strategic Plan to Prevent, Reduce, and Eventually End Homelessness,” the 2021 “Housing for a Healthy Santa Cruz: A Strategic Framework for Addressing Homelessness in Santa Cruz County” (which the City Council endorsed in 2021), and the regular Point In Time homelessness census data.
The community input regarding the challenges and impacts of oversized vehicle parking have been substantial since the 2016 California Coastal Commission hearing2 at which the Commission found “substantial issue” with a prior iteration of the Oversized Vehicle Ordinance.
In February 2019, after a prior city council member's proposal to permit overnight oversized vehicle camping on Delaware Avenue on the lower Westside, over 400 letters in opposition were sent to the city council. Community input concerns cited included environmental impacts, neighborhood safety, increased crime, garbage, human excrement, fire danger, drug dealing, and other illegal and nuisance behaviors. One recent example in which the community provided input regarding impacts from illegally parked oversized vehicles was on a one-block section of Olive Street, a residential street off Mission Street. Many community members contacted council to request that oversized vehicles not be permitted to park in this area due to public health and safety impacts and ultimately their request was honored by Council. A petition with over 1,000 signatures, urging city staff and council to address the public health and safety impacts of oversized vehicle parking was created on Change.org and sent to City staff and council.
Information was gathered on similar ordinances in other cities and counties throughout California, including coastal areas, in order to explore existing practices and options the City of Santa Cruz may have in addressing the ongoing oversized vehicle parking challenges in Santa Cruz. Commonalities in impacts of oversized vehicles in like communities were reviewed. The draft ordinance is similar to ordinances passed in other coastal cities, such as Santa Monica.
On September 21, 2021, three Councilmembers brought forth a draft ordinance concept as an introduction to the topic of managing oversized vehicles on city streets. The purpose of this introduction was for other Councilmembers and the community to have the opportunity to provide direct feedback about the ordinance language as well as the safe parking framework.
The Council voted for the Mayor to form an ad hoc Council committee to discuss a safe parking 1 See https://www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-council-subcommittees/community-advisory-committeeon-homelessness-cach 2 https://www.coastal.ca.gov/meetings/mtg-mm16-8.html
31.4 program. Two subsequent Council meetings were held – on October 26 and November 9, 2021 – where additional public comment was considered.
The Mayor subsequently appointed then-Vice Mayor Brunner, Councilmember Golder, and Councilmember Kalantari-Johnson to the ad hoc committee to continue to work with staff and the community in development of recommendations to the Council for the ordinance and safe parking framework. The ad-hoc committee engaged community members, public health/homeless service providers, members of the Association of Faith Communities, county staff and members of the Board of Supervisors to receive direct feedback and engage in thought partnership to explore opportunities. This community engagement took the form of emails, phone calls, one-on-one and group meetings. The ad hoc committee members also walked areas of the City where individuals often reside in oversized vehicles, and they conversed with vehicle dwellers in the area. The ad hoc committee also gathered research on existing efforts in similar communities, both with regard to the ordinance enforcement approach and the safe parking program approach. City staff also gathered research and met with county staff to promote alignment and explore collaboration and partnership, and the pilot safe parking program is also being used to hear directly from participants, potential participants, and nearby neighbors and businesses to adjust the safe parking program to meet diverse needs.
Kevin Grigsby, in partnership with Santa Cruz Cares and HUFF, goes on to state:
The city staff did not adequately address our concern regarding fiscal impacts in their response to our appeal. It has always been the case that the threat of constitutionality lawsuit against OVO would apply only after it has been enforced– and because the primary zone in which the city would like to enforce OVO is in the Coastal Zone, it makes sense that this concern be brought forward as a fiscal impact at this stage of its development.
The direction provided by the City Council considered fiscal implications of the ordinance and its implementation. City staff and the Planning Commission are charged with implementing direction set forth by the City Council, and the proposed Coastal Permit and Design Permit facilitate implementation of the ordinance. As part of its actions on December 14, 2021 and March 8, 2022, the Council provided funding from the American Rescue Plan Act and the $14 million provided to the City from the state for homelessness response efforts, respectively, that will support the City’s safe parking program and the implementation of the Oversize Vehicle Ordinance. However, it is not the ordinance that is under consideration with these actions.
Rather, it is the Coastal and Design Permits to implement the ordinance. Thus, the key question at hand for the Coastal Permit is whether the implementation of the parking regulations adversely impacts coastal access in a manner inconsistent with the LCP, whereas the key question for the Design Permit relates to issues of physical design of the facilities.
Kevin Grigsby, in partnership with Santa Cruz Cares and HUFF, goes on to state:
Diversity includes economic diversity (which itself often falls along racial lines).
Providing community services and facilities with changing and growing needs of a diverse group of people means actually providing those services- greywater, blackwater, and trash pick up, utilities hook ups, at extremely low or no cost for those who require it. Implementing a permitting system that only applies to people who don't have access to driveways (like those who live in apartments or
31.5 on the street) is discriminatory. Those who live in their vehicles who aren't able to participate in the city's limited services will have their homes towed and wind up experiencing unsheltered homelessness.
Making a policy that prioritizes ticketing and towing makes it more likely that people who are ineligible for city safe parking programs will have insufficient resources to appropriately dump their gray/black water. Additionally, the unsheltered homelessness that this policy will undoubtedly cause will even further decrease the access people have to restrooms. This can potentially lead to lower water standards. The solution is creating equitable access to restroom facilities and black water dumping stations/mobile collection, regardless as to whether someone can access a safe parking site.
The proposed Coastal and Design Permits will allow the City to serve, at no cost, unhoused City residents living in oversized vehicles through provision of safe overnight parking places where no such City-sponsored places previously existed (though a limited number of City-owned parking spaces have and are being offered to non-profits for their use in private safe parking programs, and a pilot project for safe parking has now been implemented for approximately five weeks, as of the drafting of this report). The safe parking locations would offer, at a minimum, trash, restroom, and hand washing services. Per Section 10.40.120(m) of the SCMC, in addition to the private property allowances authorized through Chapter 6.36.030(a), the City may operate, sponsor, or authorize safe parking programs for vehicles on any City owned or leased properties in the City, or any City-sanctioned private parking lots, and the City Manager shall develop a policy that establishes operational criteria for safe parking programs. The subject Coastal and Design Permits facilitate implementation of these provisions of the code, and in doing so, some of the ancillary impacts associated with oversized vehicles that negatively affect neighborhood quality will be addressed. For example, despite a dumpster being made available free of charge, indiscriminate dumping of trash from oversized vehicles still commonly occurs, and that conduct negatively impacts neighborhood quality. Trash services at safe parking sites will help to minimize littering in neighborhoods. Dumping of wastewater from oversized vehicles has also been a concern, and staff is exploring how best to assist oversized vehicle owners with dumping services, either through mobile services, a new facility, or vouchers for existing facilities (such as the 76 gas station at the northeast corner of Soquel Drive and Highway 1).
Kevin Grigsby’s letter made statements about the safe parking program spurring harassment or intimidation. His assertion about the effect of affixing a sticker or placard to one’s vehicle appear to be largely speculative, inasmuch as the vehicle parking program called for in the has not yet been implemented. And the Police Department disputes the characterization of its activities in ticketing vehicles for parking or other violations.
Kevin Grigsby’s letter lists numerous General Plan Policies found in Parks and Recreation Element as well as Community Design, Land Use, Economic Development Elements that either relate to the Oversize Vehicle Ordinance that has already been approved by the City Council or that neither relate to the Oversized Vehicle Ordinance nor its implementation. As detailed throughout the Planning Commission report and other documentation, the implementation of the ordinance does not adversely affect recreational access to the coast given its limited time duration, applicability, and alternative options. This report and associated attachments, including but not limited to the Coastal and Design Permit findings in the attached resolution, include numerous General Plan and Local Coastal Plan Policies that support the approval of the Coastal
31.6 and Design Permits that will allow the implementation of the safe parking program for unhoused City residents in the Coastal Zone.
Planning Commission Conditions. The revised conditions of approval show the Planning Commission’s changes underlined and in bold (as compared to those recommended by staff at the Planning Commission hearing). Staff’s responses to the changes follow, along with recommended revisions. To help distinguish between Planning Commission conditions and staff-recommended conditions, the Planning Commission conditions are in italics and are indented from both left and right margins. Staff recommendations are not italicized, and a clean version of staff’s recommended conditions of approval is attached for easier reading.
1. If one or more of the following conditions related to the safe parking program is not met with respect to all its terms, the enforcement of the Section 10.40.120(a) will not be allowed and then the approval of a safe parking program at a specified location may be revoked.
Staff’s response: Simple re-wording shown below is recommended. The tie between the safe parking program and enforcement of Section 10.40.120(a) is discussed below in more detail.
1. If one or more of the following conditions related to the safe parking program is not met with respect to all its terms, Section 10.40.120(a) will not be enforced and then the approval of a safe parking program at a specified location may be revoked.
The Planning Commission made no changes to the next condition.
2. If, upon exercise of this permit, any developed safe parking site within the coastal zone is at any time determined by the Zoning Administrator to be incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood, revocation of, or amendment to, this permit by the Planning Commission could occur. Outside of the coastal zone the Design Permit can be revoked or amended in accordance with the Santa Cruz Municipal Code.
Staff’s response: No changes were made by the Planning Commission, and staff has one additional suggested edit that clarifies that a Design Permit may not be required – and therefore is not revocable – for all locations.
2. If, upon exercise of this permit, any developed safe parking site within the coastal zone is at any time determined by the Zoning Administrator to be incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood, revocation of, or amendment to, this permit by the Planning Commission could occur. Outside of the coastal zone the Design Permit, where required for a particular location, can be revoked or amended in accordance with the Santa Cruz Municipal Code.
The Planning Commission approved the following changes:
3. The use shall meet the standards and shall be developed within limits established by Chapter 24.14 of the Santa Cruz Municipal Code as to the emission of noise, odor, smoke, dust, vibration, wastes, fumes or any public nuisance arising or occurring incidental to its establishment or operation. Mitigation measures may
31.7 be applied when proposed by Safe Parking Program participants to bring them into compliance. City of Santa Cruz will actively seek funding to provide mobile mechanics to assist participants as needed.
Staff’s response: This language regarding mitigation measures is vague. The condition is not speaking to operational criteria, rather it speaks to potential impacts. Operational criteria and rules will be addressed separately by staff, and the conditions of approval need to allow flexibility to allow for changes in how facilities are managed.
The language regarding actively seeking funding to provide mobile mechanics is not direction that Council provided, nor is such policy direction within the purview of the Planning Commission. Providing funding towards mechanics to fix oversized vehicles could quickly become a costly endeavor for the City, particularly given the costly repairs that some vehicles require to meet smog or other standards. That said, the Council subcommittee did indicate that community members have expressed a desire to assist with such services. Staff’s recommendation is to delete the language added by the Planning Commission, as shown below.
3. The use shall meet the standards and shall be developed within limits established by Chapter 24.14 of the Santa Cruz Municipal Code as to the emission of noise, odor, smoke, dust, vibration, wastes, fumes or any public nuisance arising or occurring incidental to its establishment or operation. Mitigation measures may be applied when proposed by Safe Parking Program participants to bring them into compliance. City of Santa Cruz will actively seek funding to provide mobile mechanics to assist participants as needed.
The Planning Commission approved the following changes:
4. The Safe Parking Program. As part of its consideration of the proposed development, a safe parking program as described in Section 10.40.120(m) of the Vehicles and Traffic Section of the Municipal Code framework shall be implemented by the City and remain in effect for the life of these permits. Site locations shall be in the City of Santa Cruz, and will include basic sanitation services, at a minimum toilet, handwashing stations and trash containers, and detailed information would be provided with an up to date list of and options for sanitation and black water dumping. City of Santa Cruz will actively seek funding to provide vouchers for black water dumping and fuel to offset costs for relocation and waste management for participants in the Safe Parking Program.
General parameters for the safe parking sites include:
Staff’s response: Council provided direction to establish safe parking programs, but the Council did not initially tie the provision of a safe parking program to the enforcement of the ordinance’s midnight to 5:00 a.m. parking restrictions. However, a prior condition of approval of the Coastal Permit did tie together these aspects together, as the Coastal Commission saw this as an important factor in their consideration of whether a substantial issue exists with the Coastal Permit. Thus, staff does not have a problem with retaining this portion of the language, even though it is redundant with a later condition.
31.8 Some safe parking facilities could be located just outside of the City limits, and those locations could involve City services. The text saying these facilities must be in the City limits is recommended for deletion.
Sanitation services are outlined in the bullet points below this same condition, so the added language regarding toilets, hand washing stations, and trash containers is recommended for deletion. As noted above and in prior reports, the City is seeking options for blackwater dumping, including mobile services, vouchers for use of existing facilities, and construction of a new facility. The condition calling for the City to “actively seek funding” to address the blackwater issue is not necessary, and staff’s recommendation is to delete language as shown below.
4. The Safe Parking Program. As part of its consideration of the proposed development, A safe parking program as described in Section 10.40.120(m) of the Vehicles and Traffic Section of the Municipal Code framework shall be implemented by the City and remain in effect for the life of these permits. Site locations, shall be in the City of Santa Cruz and will include basic sanitation services, at a minimum toilet, handwashing stations and trash containers, and detailed information would be provided with an up to date list of and options for sanitation and black water dumping.
City of Santa Cruz will actively seek funding to provide vouchers for black water dumping and fuel to offset costs for relocation and waste management for participants in the Safe Parking Program. General parameters for the safe parking sites include:
The Planning Commission modified sub-bullets under Condition 4, as follows:
● Off street locations (i.e. public/private parking lots). New signage shall be small-scale and designed to be incorporated into other signage in existing parking facilities. Existing sign post shall be used when possible. ● Hours generally shall be from 8:00 PM – 8:00 AM time frame. o Within the Coastal Zone, hours of operation shall be within this time frame, except that occasional, minor deviations from the 8:00 PM to 8:00 AM hours within the Coastal Zone may be allowed to facilitate provision of services to the program participants, so long as the additional hours are of a frequency, duration, and/or location such that they do not adversely interfere with coastal access.
o Outside the Coastal Zone, Facilities (for example, Tier 3 facilities where enhanced services are provided) may be operated with extended hours, including on a 24/7 basis, so long as plans adequately address required parking for other uses. If not operated on a 24/7 bases office of operation would at a minimum be 8:00PM – 8:00AM.
Staff’s response: The proposed modifications here are problematic for a number of reasons.
First, the Coastal Commission staff do not support 24/7 facilities inside the Coastal Zone, as they expressed concerns that such facilities could impact recreational coastal access by occupying parking spaces that would be used by visitors to the coast. Thus, staff recommends retaining the “Outside the Coastal Zone” qualifier in the condition.
31.9 The condition language that says the Tier 3 facilities must be operated from 8:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. at a minimum is also problematic. Flexibility is important for these facilities, and if a location were identified that, due to its normal uses, could operate from, for example, 9:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m., retaining the ability to utilize that site is important. Another example is that certain days could have limitations, such as our current pilot project that typically has a morning departure of 8:00 a.m. but requires a 7:00 a.m. departure on farmers’ market days. Similar events or unique circumstances could apply to different locations, so flexibility is important.
Staff generally anticipates a larger number of safe parking facilities with fewer numbers of vehicles per facility. The safe parking locations are intended to be located at a variety of locations in the City so as to provide dispersed options for vehicle dwellers and to promote ease of access. Staff’s recommendation is to delete the proposed language, as follows. ● Outside the Coastal Zone, Facilities (for example, Tier 3 facilities where enhanced services are provided) may be operated with extended hours, including on a 24/7 basis, so long as plans adequately address required parking for other uses. If not operated on a 24/7 bases office of operation would at a minimum be 8:00PM – 8:00AM.
The Planning Commission modified additional sub-bullets under Condition 4, as follows:
● Sanitation will be provided at all locations (i.e., porta-potties, hand washing stations, and garbage cans). Black water dumping facilities may be provided at some locations. All facilities shall, whenever possible, be located where no impacts to public vehicular or bike parking occur. When that is not possible, all facilities shall be located or operated in a manner so as to minimize vehicular and bike parking impacts to the greatest extent feasible. Locations of portapotties, hand washing stations, and trash receptacles, as well as the locations of overnight parking on the site, will also take into account the adjacent uses, visibility, maintenance of views, on- and off-site circulation, and accessibility. ● Safe Parking sites will not be sited in mapped “high impact parking areas” within the Coastal Zone.
● There will be no cost to participants in the Safe Parking Program. ● The prohibitions in Section 10.40.120(a) of the Vehicles and Traffic Section of the Municipal Code shall not be applied to any person and oversized vehicle, collectively, that does not have free and unrestricted access to a Safe Parking Program parking space and there shall be no registration or eligibility requirements to participate in the program.
Staff’s response: City staff must have a sign up and tracking system for the program. A code of conduct and sign-up procedure are needed to manage parking at the locations. To date, staff’s understanding is that the City Council has contemplated a low barrier program but not a zero barrier program. A sign-up system allows staff to direct people to the right locations where they can maneuver a large vehicle, track the numbers and use of facilities, and designate a specific lot or lots for subpopulations, like families with children. Staff’s recommendation is to delete the proposed added language, and staff does not have comments on the prior three bullets that were unchanged by the Planning Commission.
The prohibitions in Section 10.40.120(a) of the Vehicles and Traffic Section of the Municipal Code shall not be applied to any person and oversized vehicle, collectively, that
31.10 does not have free and unrestricted access to a Safe Parking Program parking space and there shall be no registration or eligibility requirements to participate in the program.
The Planning Commission further modified sub-bullets under Condition 4, as follows:
● An Operations and Management Plan for the Safe Parking Program shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator within three months from the effective date of the permits and shall contain the following:
Staff’s response: Section 10.40.2120(m) directs the City Manager to develop a policy that establishes operational criteria for safe parking programs. This has been delegated to staff who will evaluate operations and establish regulations in a way to allow flexibility to easily modify the program administratively as conditions evolve and as staff hears more from program participants and nearby residents and businesses. Participant agreements will be included as part of the operations and management plan, and draft agreements for Tier 1 and Tier 2 programs are attached. Staff’s recommendation is to modify the proposed language as shown below, which eliminates the need for a Zoning Administrator approval. ● An Operations and Management Plan for the Safe Parking Program shall be developed by staff and shall contain, at a minimum, the following: (See further below for staff’s recommended contents, which differ from that of the Planning Commission conditions noted immediately below.)
The Planning Commission further modified sub-bullets under Condition 4, as follows, with the following text revisions falling under the Commission’s condition related to the operations and management plan:
o Procedures for informing law enforcement personnel in real time of the availability of Safe Parking Program parking spaces. This procedure shall be in place prior to enforcement of the Section 10.40.120(a).
Staff’s response: Real time can be interpreted in numerous ways. Staff’s recommendation is to modify the proposed language as shown below, which represents one item to be included in the operations and management plan.
o Procedures for informing law enforcement personnel of nightly availability of Safe Parking Program parking spaces. This procedure shall be in place prior to enforcement of the Section 10.40.120(a).
The Planning Commission further modified sub-bullets under Condition 4, as follows, with the following text revisions falling under the Commission’s condition related to the operations and management plan:
o Procedures for the filing and resolving of complaints.
Staff’s response: Staff recommends minor clarifying language for this component of the operations and management plan, as follows.
31.11 o Procedures for the filing and resolving of complaints from participants and nearby residents and businesses.
The Planning Commission further modified sub-bullets under Condition 4, as follows, with the following text revisions falling under the Commission’s condition related to the operations and management plan:
o Procedures to ensure that potential participants of the Safe Parking Program will confront no barriers to their participation. Good neighbor rules of behavior may be applied.
Staffs response: To date, staff’s understanding is that the Council has contemplated a low barrier program but not a zero barrier program. The Safe Parking Program will include low barrier signup requirements including a code of conduct and associated agreements. Issuing permits will allow staff to assign and track locations. Size of a vehicle will dictate where a vehicle can maneuver. Staff’s recommendation is to delete the proposed language and add language calling for the operations and management plan to include a code of conduct and participant agreement. o Procedures to ensure that potential participants of the Safe Parking Program will confront no barriers to their participation. Good neighbor rules of behavior may be applied. Code of conduct and participant agreement.
The Planning Commission further modified sub-bullets under Condition 4, as follows, with the following text revisions falling under the Commission’s condition related to the operations and management plan:
o Details regarding the funding and management of Safe Parking Program locations.
Staff’s response: Budgetary considerations are handled through the regular process – either through authorization/use of existing budget or requesting funding from the City Council. Staff’s recommendation is to delete the proposed language.
o Details regarding the funding and management of Safe Parking Program locations.
The Planning Commission did not modify the final sub-bullet related to the operations and management plan.
● Additional operational criteria may be applied by the City Manager, pursuant to Section 10.40.120(m) of the SCMC.
Staff’s response: No comment.
The Planning Commission approved the following changes:
5. Notwithstanding the exceptions noted in Section 10.40.120(g) of the Vehicles and Traffic Section of the Municipal Code and, in particular, the exception noted in Section
31.12 10.40.120(g)(7), the parking restrictions contained in Section 10.40.120(a) shall not be implemented until and unless at least one safe parking location is in operation a safe space is available. If all available safe parking spaces are filled, Section 10.40.120(a) shall not be enforced.
Staff’s response: Per Section 10.40.120(g)(7), Section 10.40.120(a) (the midnight to 5:00 a.m. parking restrictions) shall not be enforced against a person and oversized vehicle that are, collectively, registered and participating in a safe parking program or other safe sleeping or transitional shelter program operated or sanctioned by the City, but do not have access to a safe parking space or other shelter options under such programs due to a lack of capacity. Staff recommends using the language that was proposed to the Planning Commission, as shown below.
5. Notwithstanding the exceptions noted in Section 10.40.120(g) of the Vehicles and Traffic Section of the Municipal Code and, in particular, the exception noted in Section
10.40.120(g)(7), the parking restrictions contained in Section 10.40.120(a) shall not be implemented until and unless at least one safe parking location is in operation.
The Planning Commission approved the following changes:
6. If a vehicle cannot relocate to a Safe Parking Location due a mechanical issue, lack or fuel or physical, mental or emotional difficulties of the vehicle operator that prevents safe operation of the vehicle the parking restrictions will not be enforced for up to 72 hours and the right to sleep at the current location will be observed. The City shall notify the occupant of any resources available to assist in remedying whatever is preventing them from moving their vehicle to an available safe parking spot.
Staff’s response: Section 10.40.120(g)(3) provides accommodations for oversized vehicles involved in an emergency or being repaired under emergency conditions. Emergency parking may be allowed for twenty-four consecutive hours where an oversized vehicle is left standing at the roadside because of mechanical breakdown or because of the driver’s physical incapacity to proceed. Staff’s recommendation is to delete this condition in favor of the existing ordinance language.
6. If a vehicle cannot relocate to a Safe Parking Location due a mechanical issue, lack or fuel or physical, mental or emotional difficulties of the vehicle operator that prevents safe operation of the vehicle the parking restrictions will not be enforced for up to 72 hours and the right to sleep at the current location will be observed. The City shall notify the occupant of any resources available to assist in remedying whatever is preventing them from moving their vehicle to an available safe parking spot.
The Planning Commission did not make any changes to the final condition.
7. At the end of the first year of operation, City staff will prepare a report that outlines the program operations in the Coastal Zone, its usage, the number of parking stalls affected, and complaints received regarding the program. If it is determined that any of the standards applicable in the Coastal Zone and identified in conditions above have not been met or if it is
31.13 determined that a use has impacted availability of public parking spaces such that public parking is not otherwise available in the location where the safe parking program is being operated, then the City shall propose modifications to operations so as to remedy those situations. A copy of the report shall be submitted to the Executive Director of the Coastal Commission for review and approval. If the Executive Director determines that the safe parking program is negatively impacting public access, then the program shall be modified to eliminate such impacts, or mitigate them to the maximum extent feasible as directed by the Executive Director, including but not limited to elimination of the safe parking program location(s) in the Coastal Zone.
Staff’s response: No comment, except to note that this condition was developed in coordination with Coastal Commission staff.
The City is directly establishing or facilitating the establishment of safe parking locations.
Staff’s proposed conditions of approval tie enforcement of the midnight to 5:00 a.m. parking restrictions to the implementation of the safe parking facilities. The OVO specifies that the midnight to 5:00 a.m. parking restrictions cannot be enforced if a person and vehicle are registered to participate in a safe parking program but insufficient capacity exists. This provides individuals who are forced to live in their vehicles by circumstances beyond their control an alternative to unregulated parking on any City street.
The oversized vehicle ordinance revision was the result of the impacts that oversized/recreational vehicles (RVs) have had on the community, public safety and environment. In July 2021, a survey found an average of 65 oversized vehicles parked on city streets primarily within the Coastal Zone and raising many issues. The types of issues are reflected in the calls for service include: the illegal dumping of trash, debris and human waste onto City streets, sidewalks, and waterways; fires associated with oversized vehicles; lack of access to neighborhood and coastal parking; and increased criminal activities in areas where oversized vehicles are parked, including theft of bicycles and other property, private water connections being used, and gasoline thefts.
The City has responded by facilitating safe parking locations, allowing them to operate without the need for any City permits or oversight in religious assembly and business parking lots and expanding the number of vehicles allowed at said locations to six and three, respectively, at any such locations. The City has, in the past, incurred direct costs for provision of safe parking spaces on City-owned lots. For example, the City has allowed the Association of Faith Communities to manage safe parking facilities on City parking lots, and the City has paid for trash removal, portable restroom, and handwashing facilities to be located and serviced for said parking. The AFC currently manages 20 safe parking spaces in the City limits and has five new safe parking spaces coming on line in the near future. AFC also has 25 safe parking spaces in the County, for a total of 45 spaces. It is unknown how many safe parking spaces are operated at businesses or at religious institutions not affiliated with the AFC, because, as mentioned above, the City does not require any permits or oversight of said facilities. However, it is known that business and religious assembly uses do participate or at least have participated in such allowances, above and beyond those facilities operated by AFC, as complaints are received regarding such uses or such uses are observed from time to time.
As of the end of February 2022, the City is operating three safe parking locations that allow for nine vehicles to park as part of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 parking programs directed by the Council.
Two of these locations have additional off-street expansion capacity. The City also provides the
31.14 AFC one parking spot at a public lot that they have used intermittently and has offered another public parking lot for them to use; however, they have indicated that they do not currently have the staffing to expand into another additional lot and have concerns about the location of the lot.
The City has established these programs as pilots so that lessons can be learned from them in advance of expanding to accommodate larger numbers of vehicles.
The controlling of oversized vehicle parking during the hours of midnight to 5:00 a.m. does not unreasonably limit access to the coast. Other areas of the coast also have limited uses between the hours of midnight and 5:00 a.m., such as Main Beach and Cowell Beach, and in 2008, the Coastal Commission approved parking restrictions on West Cliff Drive between the hours of midnight and 5:00 a.m. The State also closes and locks its own parking areas – both free and paid lots. For example, hours posted on the California Parks and Recreation website for Lighthouse State Beach are 7:00 a.m. to sunset and for Natural Bridges State Park are 8:00 a.m. to sunset. Both areas have gates that are locked during closed hours.
It is also worth noting here that one goal of the City’s OSV ordinance is to increase access to the coast for all. OSVs are, by definition, oversized, and take up a large share of coastal parking. It is common for large OSVs to remain in coastal areas for long periods of time, without significantly moving, thus, greatly reducing the amount of coastal parking available to those who wish to visit the coast. The City’s OSV ordinance facilitates the daily movement of OSVs, with one aim being an increase in the total number of parking spaces available for those who wish to visit the coast.
The proposed midnight to 5:00 a.m. parking restrictions are narrowly tailored to only address the late night/early morning hours. And, there are exceptions to the 12:00 a.m. – 5:00 a.m. rule which further limit its applicability. See Section 10.40.120(g). By having the oversized vehicles access safe parking facilities in the evenings and into morning and by offering both trash services and restroom facilities at said locations, the proposed approach contemplated with the ordinance and the implementing Coastal and Design Permits directly addresses two of the most problematic issues with oversized vehicles – trash disposal and wastewater disposal. Additionally, the exceptions contained later in Section 10.40.120 further narrow the applicability of the parking restrictions contained in Section 10.40.120(a).
The proposed conditions of approval tie the implementation of the safe parking facilities to the enforcement of the midnight to 5:00 a.m. parking restrictions, so that condition, coupled with the fact that the midnight to 5:00 a.m. parking restrictions cannot be enforced if a person and vehicle are participating in a safe parking program but insufficient capacity exists, ensures that the act of sleeping in a vehicle is not criminalized.
The ordinance and associated permits provide more options for those living in vehicles than are currently available. A safe place to park overnight with trash and sanitation services – all free of charge – is being offered with implementation of the ordinance, and the conditions of approval previously did and still, as recommended, continue to require that at least one safe parking facility be established before overnight restrictions are enforced, while the ordinance states that nighttime restrictions cannot be enforced against a person and vehicle that are participating in the safe parking programs but are unable to access them due to lack of capacity.
Nothing in the ordinance or the implementing permits are discriminatory. Parking lots, including those where safe parking facilities will be operated, are designed to meet accessibility
31.15 requirements. Accessible restrooms will be provided in select safe parking facilities, and those with disabilities will be directed to those locations.
Ample daytime oversize vehicle parking options remain available throughout the Coastal Zone and throughout the City, even with the prohibition of oversized vehicle parking within 100 feet of an intersection, which is in place to promote safety by providing line of sight around oversized vehicles. Aside from the limitation of not parking within 100 feet of an intersection, access to recreate at the coast is otherwise unaffected between the hours of 5:00 a.m. and midnight.
Local Coastal Plan (LCP) Consistency
The oversized vehicles permitting system will provide access with limited hours while trying to address many of the LCP policies listed below.
- 2.1 Meet or exceed State Water Resources Control Board standards for discharge of sewage and storm waters to the Monterey Bay.
- 2.3 Ensure that new development or land uses near surface water and groundwater recharge areas do not degrade water quality.
- 4.1.5 Protect the quality of water discharged into the Bay and allow no dumping of materials into the Monterey Bay.
- 2.1.3 Protect the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary and the shoreline and views to and along the ocean, recognizing their value as natural and recreational resources. - 2.2 Preserve important public views and viewsheds by ensuring that the scale, bulk and setback of new development does not impede or disrupt them. - 2.6.5 Protect neighborhood quality through improvement of blighted areas, traffic management, design guidelines, adequate buffers and other development techniques. - 3.5 Protect coastal recreation areas, maintain all existing coastal access points open to the public, and enhance public access, open space quality and recreational enjoyment in a manner that is consistent with the California Coastal Act. - 3.5.4 Wherever feasible and appropriate, distribute public facilities (including parking areas) throughout the coastal recreation area to mitigate the impacts of overcrowding or over-use by the public of any single area.
- 3.5.5 Develop and implement plans to maximize public access and enjoyment of recreations areas along the coastline.
- 1.7 Recognize and protect the Pacific Ocean and Monterey Bay as a valuable open space, natural resource, and National Marine Sanctuary.
- 1.7 Develop plans to repair, maintain and maximize public access and enjoyment of recreational areas along the coastline consistent with sound resource conservation principle, safety, and rights of private property owners. - 2.1 The dramatic views from West Cliff Drive shall remain unimpaired and unobstructed by vegetation, structures or accumulated refuse.
Health in All Policies.
Health. The health and well-being of all Santa Cruz residents and the environment are of utmost importance. The public health impacts of extended oversized vehicle parking include dumping of trash, debris, and human waste onto City streets, sidewalks, and waterways. The proposed implementation of the ordinance will provide safe parking facilities that include restrooms and trash services to minimize the need for illegal dumping.
31.16 The provision of restrooms and trash services will be provided to those living in oversize vehicles within the City, and there will be no cost to participants in Safe Parking Programs. The City Manager’s office, Public Works, and Homelessness Response teams will continue to work closely with County partners including the Human Services and Health Departments and service providers to either expand the existing, non-profit-run program or establish a new safe parking program. This program will include case management support to assist individuals in directly engaging in pathways to housing. Families with children, seniors, transition aged youth, veterans, and individuals with disabilities will be prioritized.
Equity. An appointed Council ad-hoc committee will continue to work with City staff and community partners to further develop and ensure implementation of the above described safe parking framework in a manner that is widely accessible and will report to the Council with additional recommended actions. The safe parking operation will include low barrier spaces and participation will be free.
Sustainability. Environmental sustainability is a core value of the City of Santa Cruz and informs all City operations. Prohibiting the use of public right-of-way for oversized vehicle parking throughout the City of Santa Cruz, coupled with safe parking options that provide trash and bathroom services, would reduce the likelihood of human waste entering the storm drain system or contaminating the nearby environment.
Environmental Review. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides several “categorical exemptions” which are applicable to categories of projects and activities that the Natural Resource Agency has determined generally do not pose a risk of significant impacts on the environment. Section 15307 of the CEQA Guidelines “consists of actions taken by regulatory agencies... to assure the maintenance, restoration, or enhancement of a natural resource where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment.” Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines “consists of actions taken by regulatory agencies… to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for the protection of the environment.” The proposed ordinance and its implementation are not anticipated to result in any new construction, including but not limited to any construction of new facilities for public services such as police, parks, or fire. Many individuals already park oversized vehicles in the City, and the ordinance and its implementation are not anticipated to result in any additional impacts associated with parking of oversized vehicles. By providing safe parking locations where sanitation facilities would be present and by prohibiting overnight parking elsewhere, the proposed ordinance and its implementation are expected to result in significantly fewer instances of overnight parking on City streets where sanitation facilities, including restrooms and trash services, are unavailable. That change, in and of itself, will create beneficial impacts to the environment through an increase in the proper disposal of waste compared to existing conditions and allowances, where the City itself has historically hosted no designated safe parking locations. Further, the City’s experience has been that the most significant environmental degradation associated with oversized vehicle overnight parking occurs in places where groups of oversized vehicles congregate and become entrenched in an area and remain in that area for an extended period of time. As such, the ordinance will reduce environmental impacts when comparing its outcomes to the status quo. As the majority of environmental impacts resulting from the ordinance will be beneficial rather than detrimental and with the other potential environmental effects being de minimis, the project is also exempt under
31.17 Code of Regulations Section 15061(b), the “common sense exemption,” since it can be seen with certainty that no significant effect on the environment will occur.
Section 15282-(j) is for projects restriping streets to relieve traffic congestion while Section 15301Class 1-c allows for alterations of existing streets, sidewalks, gutters and similar facilities that do not create additional automobile lanes. The City’s experience has shown overnight parking occurs in places where groups of oversized vehicles congregate and become entrenched in an area causing congestion and degradation of the environment. The ordinance will reduce these impacts by proving safe parking in a controlled environment.
SUMMARY
In response to community concerns about oversized vehicle parking impacts to neighborhoods and the environment, the City Council approved amendments of existing codes to prohibit oversized vehicles parking for extended periods of time as well as establishment of an oversized vehicles permitting system that limits the total amount of time that any oversized vehicle parks on the City’s right-of-way, streets, and off-street parking lots while simultaneously directing implementation of a three-tiered safe parking program for individuals who reside in their vehicles, from emergency parking to low barrier parking to a robust safe parking program that will provide service support and opportunities for pathways to permanent housing.
While no single and simple solution exists that adequately mitigates the noted impacts, the ordinance revision and its implementation are an attempt to balance the needs of parking access with the community’s quality of life and environmental resources that are being affected by oversized vehicles.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
Prepared By:
Michael Ferry
Senior Planner
Submitted By:
Lee Butler
Planning and Community
Development Director
Approved By:
Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution
2) Conditions of Approval
3) Email from Councilmember Golder Calling Item up for Review 4) Planning Commission Action Summary of March 3, 2020
5) Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 3, 2022 6) Draft Participation Agreement Tier 1
7) Draft Participation Agreement Tier 2
31.18 RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ
ACKNOWLEDGING THE CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND APPROVING A COASTAL
PERMIT AND DESIGN PERMIT TO AUTHORIZE THE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATED
WITH THE AMENDED MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PARKING OF
OVERSIZED VEHICLES AND TO IMPLEMENT CITY-WIDE SAFE PARKING PROGRAMS
FOR UNHOUSED CITY RESIDENTS LIVING IN OVERSIZED VEHICLES IN THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ.
(APPLICATION NO. CP21-0174)
WHEREAS, On November 9, 2021, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2021-20 amending Santa Cruz Municipal Code (SCMC) Title 10 amending “Vehicles and Traffic” at Chapter 10.04 “Definitions” and Chapter 10.40 “Stopping, Standing and Parking” and Chapter
10.41 “City-Wide Parking Permit” pertaining to the parking of oversized vehicles and Chapter
16.19 “Storm Water and Urban Runoff Pollution Control” at Section 16.19.070; and WHEREAS, On November 9, 2021, The City Council approved a motion to direct staff to implement City-operated and sponsored safe parking programs for unhoused City residents living in oversized vehicles licensed and registered in the City of Santa Cruz. Council directed staff to return with draft-ready contracts and associated costs within four months of the passing of the ordinance. Safe parking programs would include a three-tiered approach that consists of the following:
a) Emergency overnight safe parking on City-owned parcels for a minimum of three vehicles to be implemented immediately.
b) Safe overnight parking on City-owned parcels or other non-residential approved spaces for a minimum of thirty vehicles throughout the City to be implemented within four months of the passing of the above listed ordinance. c) A robust safe parking program in partnership with service providers, health providers, and County partners. The following subpopulations will be prioritized:
Families with children; seniors; transition age youth; veterans; and those with a valid disabled placard or license plate issued pursuant to the California Vehicle Code; and
WHEREAS, the project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption in State CEQA Guidelines Categorical Exemption: 15282-(j); 15301 Class 1-c, g; 15307; 15308 and 15061(b), as discussed in full in the staff report; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator conducted a public hearing on January 12, 2022 and, after hearing public testimony, acknowledge the environmental determination and approved the Coastal Permit, and Design Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrators approval was appealed to the Planning Commission on January 14, 2022 by Santa Cruz Cares via representative Reggie Meisler; and
31.19 RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrators approval was also appealed to the Planning Commission on January 25, 2022 by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) via representative William S. Freeman; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on February 17, 2022, which was continued to March 3, 2022 and, after hearing public testimony, acknowledged the environmental determination and approved the Coastal Permit, and Design Permit with revised Conditions of Approval; and
WHEREAS, On March 14, 2022 Council member Golder called this item up for review due to the timing and feasibility of implementing the revised Conditions of Approval and their potential impact on the effectiveness of the ordinance and potential fiscal impacts; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on April 12, 2022 to consider the application and the full public record; and WHEREAS, the City Council now makes the following findings:
Coastal Permit, Section 24.08.250
1. Maintain views between the sea and the first public roadway parallel to the sea.
The implementation of the ordinance revision will not affect coastal views. This ordinance and its implementation are expected to enhance views by regulating parking of oversized vehicles adjacent to the coast, because no oversize vehicle parking is allowed within 100 feet of an intersection. The intent of this is to promote visibility for people driving, thereby enhancing safety; however, a benefit is also that views from roadways intersecting the first public roadway parallel to the sea will be less obstructed.
No safe parking facilities will be located in the high-impact parking zones identified by the Coastal Commission.
2. Protect vegetation, natural habitats and natural resources consistent with the Local Coastal Land Use Plan.
The ordinance and its implementation are designed to discourage illegal dumping of sewage and grey-water from RVs that may contribute to the high bacteria levels at Cowell Beach and other coastal areas. Free trash and restroom services will be provided at safe parking locations to discourage illegal dumping and littering. The project has been evaluated for potential environmental impacts in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s environmental review procedures. No vegetation, natural habitats or natural resources will be disturbed.
One of the issues that is most often raised with regard to extended oversized vehicle parking is the discharge of raw sewage onto City streets and into storm drains. Runoff
31.20 RESOLUTION NO.
from the City’s storm drain system is periodically tested as part of regional testing efforts, but not at a scale that would be able to quantify the environmental impacts under discussion. Any verified discharge of human waste into the storm sewer system is considered a violation of the City’s Municipal Code (Section 16.19.090); if left unaddressed, the City is at risk of violating its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Regional Permit, which could lead to enforcement actions by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
3. Be consistent with any applicable design plans and/or area plans incorporated into the Local Coastal Land Use Plan, in that it implements policies therein.
The ordinance revision and its implementation, including safe parking facilities, are consistent with the General Plan, all Area Plans and Local Coastal Plan in that they further and implement many of the public safety and environmental protection policies from those plans. The oversized vehicles permitting system will provide access with limited hours while trying to address many of the LCP policies below. 2.1 Meet or exceed State Water Resources Control Board standards for discharge of sewage and storm waters to the Monterey Bay. 2.3 Ensure that new development or land uses near surface water and groundwater recharge areas do not degrade water quality.
4.1.5 Protect the quality of water discharged into the Bay and allow no dumping of materials into the Monterey Bay. 2.1.3 Protect the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary and the shoreline and views to and along the ocean, recognizing their value as natural and recreational resources. 2.2 Preserve important public views and viewsheds by ensuring that the scale, bulk and setback of new development does not impede or disrupt them. 2.6.5 Protect neighborhood quality through improvement of blighted areas, traffic management, design guidelines, adequate buffers and other development techniques. 3.5 Protect coastal recreation areas, maintain all existing coastal access points open to the public, and enhance public access, open space quality and recreational enjoyment in a manner that is consistent with the California Coastal Act. 3.5.4 Wherever feasible and appropriate, distribute public facilities (including parking areas) throughout the coastal recreation area to mitigate the impacts of overcrowding or over-use by the public of any single area. 3.5.5 Develop and implement plans to maximize public access and enjoyment of recreations areas along the coastline. 3.7 Recognize and protect the Pacific Ocean and Monterey Bay as a valuable open space, natural resource, and National Marine Sanctuary. 1.7 Develop plans to repair, maintain and maximize public access and enjoyment of recreational areas along the coastline consistent with sound resource conservation principle, safety, and rights of private property owners. 2.1 The dramatic views from West Cliff Drive shall remain unimpaired and unobstructed by vegetation, structures or accumulated refuse. The ordinance is designed to discourage illegal dumping of sewage and grey-water from RVs that may contribute to the high bacteria levels at Cowell Beach and other coastal areas. No vegetation, natural habitats or natural resources will be disturbed with implementation of the ordinance. Safe Parking will be located outside of the mapped “high impact” parking areas which will enhance coastal access by increasing the available parking that used to be occupied by oversized vehicles. The project has been evaluated for potential environmental impacts
31.21 RESOLUTION NO.
in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s environmental review procedures.
4. Maintain public access to the coast along any coastline as set forth in the Local Coastal Land Use Plan.
The parking restriction will increase coastal access by making the coast cleaner and safer for the general public, in part by minimizing litter and black water dumping, and thereby more attractive as well. There are numerous locations in the area that provide overnight facilities for oversize vehicle camping. The Upper Harbor has RV camping facilities as well as Forest of Nisene Marks, Manresa, New Brighton, San Andres KOA, Seacliff and Sunset State Beaches. These are appropriate overnight camping areas designed to accommodate large vehicles that are seeking coastal access. The oversized vehicle parking restrictions are in effect from midnight to 5:00 AM, so recreational access to the beach will not be impacted. Permit processes will provide additional options for parking oversized vehicles on-street overnight, including for visitors to the coast.
The City Manager’s office, and the City Homelessness Response teams will identify and make available safe parking spaces on city owned land and/or other non-residential approved spaces for a minimum of thirty oversized vehicles. The city will either partner with outside providers or directly provide overnight monitoring. Individuals in these parking spaces will be connected and linked to other transitional sheltering options that are available throughout the county. The safe parking facilities located within the Coastal Zone will have locational, hourly, and other operational criteria that ensure public access is maintained. Staff will prepare an analysis at the end of the first year of operation that details the safe parking operations in the Coastal Zone and offers an opportunity for collaboration with Coastal Commission staff to address any public access issues that may arise as part of the operations.
5. Be consistent with the Local Coastal Land Use Plan goal of providing visitorserving needs as appropriate.
There are numerous appropriate locations in the area that provide overnight facilities for RV camping. The Upper Harbor has RV camping facilities as well as Forest of Nisene Marks, Manresa, New Brighton, San Andres KOA, Seacliff and Sunset State Beaches.
These are appropriate overnight camping areas designed to accommodate large vehicles that are seeking coastal access. Recreational access to the beach will not be impacted during the hours of 5:00 a.m. to midnight, and permit processes are available for visitors to the coast to temporarily park their oversized vehicles on City streets from midnight to 5:00 a.m.
The City Manager’s office, and the City Homelessness Response teams will identify and make available safe parking spaces on city owned land and/or other non-residential approved spaces for a minimum of thirty oversized vehicles. The city will either partner with outside providers or directly provide overnight monitoring. Individuals in these parking spaces will be connected and linked to other transitional sheltering options that
31.22 RESOLUTION NO.
are available throughout the county. Permit processes will provide additional options for parking oversized vehicles on-street overnight, including for visitors to the coast.
As part of its consideration of implementing the proposed ordinance, a safe parking framework is proposed. All site locations will be outside of the mapped high impact parking areas within the coastal zone. The sites will include information and options for sanitation and black water dumping. General parameters for the safe parking sites include off street locations (i.e. public/private parking lots) with hours that will generally be from 8:00 PM to 8:00 AM in the Coastal Zone. Sanitation will be provided at these locations such as porta-potties, washing stations, garbage cans and potentially blackwater pumping facilities or vouchers. All sanitation facilities will be located to minimize parking impacts. There will be no cost to participants in Safe Parking Program.
6. Be consistent with the Local Coastal Land Use Plan goal of encouraging coastal development uses as appropriate.
The revised ordinance and its implementation will enhance coastal access by providing a cleaner and safer environment for the general public, in part by minimizing litter and black water dumping through provision of free trash and restroom facilities for those living in oversized vehicles. Recreational access to the beach will not be impacted.
Permit processes will provide additional options for parking oversized vehicles on-street overnight, including for visitors to the coast.
All safe parking sites to be developed will be located outside of the mapped high impact parking areas within the coastal zone.
Shoreline Protection Overlay District, Section 24.10.2430
7. The project protects trees and vegetation and sensitive wildlife habitat.
The ordinance revisions and safe parking facilities will not affect trees, vegetation or sensitive wildlife habitat.
8. The project is consistent with the following criteria for bluff or cliff development:
a. The development is sited and designed to assure stability and structural integrity of its expected economic life span and minimize alterations to natural landforms.
b. The development will not create or contribute significantly to problems of erosion or geologic instability on the site or on surrounding geologically hazardous areas.
31.23 RESOLUTION NO.
c. The development minimizes alteration of cliffs, bluff tops, faces or bases, and will not interfere with sand movement.
d. The development which proposes use of retaining walls shall be allowed only to stabilize slopes. Sea walls at the toe of sea cliffs to check marine erosion shall be allowed only where there is no less environmentally damaging alternative.
e. The development within one hundred feet of any cliff or bluff line shall follow the recommendations of an approved geologic report by a registered geologist. The area where such a report is required may be increased where the issue of slope stability requires a greater distance from any cliff or bluff line.
The ordinance revisions and implementation of them, including safe parking facilities, will not affect any cliff or bluff.
9. The project provides maximum erosion protection, using accepted engineering practices and other methods and specifications set forth in this title.
The ordinance revisions and implementation of them, including safe parking facilities, will not affect any cliff or bluff.
10. The project maintains public view corridors between the sea and the first public roadway parallel to the sea and maintain natural views of the coastline.
The ordinance revisions and implementation of them will not adversely affect views of the coastline. Oversize vehicle parking limitations within 100 feet of an intersection will enhance views, though their primary intent is to provide safe line of sight for drivers.
Signage will predominantly be placed on existing sign-posts. All safe parking sites will be located outside of the mapped “high impact” parking areas within the coastal zone and generally 300 feet from the bluff.
11. The project protects paleontological resources as prescribed in the Land Use Plan.
The ordinance revisions and implementation of them, including safe parking facilities, are not expected to create any land disturbances that would affect any paleontological resources.
12. The project protects and enhances free public access to or along the beach, and sign such access when necessary.
31.24 RESOLUTION NO.
The ordinance revision will not take away any free public parking or bona fide beach access. The revised ordinance will enhance coastal access by providing a cleaner and safer environment for the general public, in part by minimizing litter and black water dumping through the provision of free, safe, oversized vehicle parking facilities that include trash and restroom services. Recreational access to the beach will not be impacted. Permit processes will provide additional options for parking oversized vehicles on-street overnight, including for visitors to the coast. Any new signage required will predominantly use existing sign-posts.
13. The project includes mitigation measures prescribed in any applicable environmental document.
There are no mitigation measures required; however, various conditions have been included that protect the environment, such as provision of trash receptacles and portapotties at the safe parking facilities.
14. The project is compatible with the established physical scale of the area.
The ordinance revisions and their implementation will not adversely affect the physical scale of any area, and any signage will be placed predominantly on existing sign-posts.
Safe parking facilities will have restroom facilities, hand washing stations, and trash receptacles that, by their nature, would not be incompatible with the scale of the area.
15. The project is consistent with the design review guidelines of this title and the policies of any applicable area plan.
The signage will be consistent with the Public Works and Police sign criteria.
16. The project is consistent with the policies of the Local Coastal Program, the General Plan, and the California Coastal Act.
The proposed ordinance revision and their implementation are consistent with the policies of the Local Coastal Program, the General Plan and the California Coastal Act in that the ordinance amendment and their implementation will result will benefit the community along stretches of the coast that are currently impacted by black water dumping, littering, and other nuisance issues. The oversized vehicles permitting system will provide access with limited hours while trying to address many of the LCP policies below. 2.1 Meet or exceed State Water Resources Control Board standards for discharge of sewage and storm waters to the Monterey Bay. 2.3 Ensure that new development or land uses near surface water and groundwater recharge areas do not degrade water quality. 4.1.5 Protect the quality of water discharged into the Bay and allow no dumping of materials into the Monterey Bay. 2.1.3 Protect the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary and the shoreline and views to and along the ocean, recognizing their value as natural and recreational resources. 2.2 Preserve important public views and viewsheds by ensuring that the scale, bulk and setback of new development does not impede or disrupt them. 2.6.5 Protect neighborhood quality through improvement of
31.25 RESOLUTION NO.
blighted areas, traffic management, design guidelines, adequate buffers and other development techniques. 3.5 Protect coastal recreation areas, maintain all existing coastal access points open to the public, and enhance public access, open space quality and recreational enjoyment in a manner that is consistent with the California Coastal Act.
3.5.4 Wherever feasible and appropriate, distribute public facilities (including parking areas) throughout the coastal recreation area to mitigate the impacts of overcrowding or over-use by the public of any single area. 3.5.5 Develop and implement plans to maximize public access and enjoyment of recreations areas along the coastline. 3.7 Recognize and protect the Pacific Ocean and Monterey Bay as a valuable open space, natural resource, and National Marine Sanctuary. 1.7 Develop plans to repair, maintain and maximize public access and enjoyment of recreational areas along the coastline consistent with sound resource conservation principle, safety, and rights of private property owners. 2.1 The dramatic views from West Cliff Drive shall remain unimpaired and unobstructed by vegetation, structures or accumulated refuse.
Recreational access to the beach will not be impacted and it will not adversely affect free public parking or beach access. All safe parking sites to be developed will be located outside of the mapped high impact parking areas within the Coastal Zone.
Design Permit, Section 24.08.430 (Applicable to the safe parking locations)
17. The site plan shall be consistent with physical development policies of the General Plan, any required or optional element of the General Plan, any area plan or specific plan or other city policy for physical development. If located in the Coastal Zone, a site plan shall also be consistent with policies of the Local Coastal Program.
The project is consistent with the General Plan, the Beach South of Laurel Plan and the Seabright Area Plan in that the ordinance amendment and its implementation will benefit the community along stretches of the coast that are currently impacted by black water dumping, littering, and other nuisance issues, thus the proposal will support a variety of environmental goals and policies of the General Plan, such as protection of riparian and natural habitats (General Plan Goals NRC 1 & 2). The safe parking facilities will promote protection of open spaces that provide scenic, recreational, educational, and environmental benefits by encouraging proper disposal of trash and waste, thereby supporting General Plan Policies LU3.11, LU3.11.1, LU3.11.2, and LU3.11.3. Safe parking facilities will be organized so as to provide locations where unhoused vehicle dwellers in the City can legally park overnight while at the same time minimizing parking and aesthetic impacts. Recreational access to the beach will not be impacted and it will not adversely affect free public parking or beach access. All safe parking sites to be developed will be located outside of the mapped high impact parking areas within the coastal zone.
18. The exterior design and appearance of buildings and structures and the design of the site plan shall be compatible with design and appearance of other existing
31.26 RESOLUTION NO.
buildings and structures in neighborhoods which have established architectural character worthy of preservation.
A condition of approval requires that locations of porta-potties, hand washing stations, and trash receptacles will take into account the adjacent uses, visibility, maintenance of views, accessibility, and maintenance of public parking spaces.
19. Design of the site plan shall respect design principles in terms of maintaining a balance of scale, form and proportion, using design components, which are harmonious, materials and colors that blend with elements of the site plan and surrounding areas. Location of structures should take into account maintenance of view; rooftop mechanical equipment shall be incorporated into roof design or screened from adjacent properties. Utility installations such as trash enclosures, storage units, traffic-control devices, transformer vaults and electrical meters shall be accessible and screened.
A condition of approval requires that locations of porta-potties, hand washing stations, and trash receptacles will take into account the adjacent uses, visibility, maintenance of views, accessibility, and maintenance of public parking spaces.
20. Where a site plan abuts, or is in close proximity to, uses other than that proposed, the plan should take into account its effect on other land uses. Where a nonresidential use abuts or is in close proximity to a residential use, the effect of the site plan should maintain the residential quality of adjacent or nearby areas.
A condition of approval requires that locations of porta-potties, hand washing stations, and trash receptacles will take into account the adjacent uses, visibility, maintenance of views, accessibility, and maintenance of public parking spaces.
21. The orientation and location of buildings, structures, open spaces and other features of the site plan shall be such as to maintain natural resources including significant trees and shrubs to the extent feasible, maintain a compatible relationship to and preserve solar access of adjacent properties, and minimize alteration of natural land forms, building profiles, location, and orientation must relate to natural land forms.
A condition of approval requires that locations of porta-potties, hand washing stations, and trash receptacles will take into account the adjacent uses, visibility, maintenance of views, accessibility, and maintenance of public parking spaces.
22. The site plan shall be situated and designed to protect views along the ocean and of scenic coastal areas. Where appropriate and feasible, the site plan shall restore and enhance visual quality of visually degraded areas.
The view of the ocean will remain unchained.
31.27 RESOLUTION NO.
23. The site plan shall minimize the effect of traffic conditions on abutting streets through careful layout of the site with respect to location, dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian entrances, exit drives and walkways; through the adequate provision of off-street parking and loading facilities; through an adequate circulation pattern within the boundaries of the development; and through the surfacing and lighting of off-street parking facilities.
A condition of approval requires that locations of porta-potties, hand washing stations, and trash receptacles, as well as locations of overnight parking on the site, will take into account the adjacent uses, visibility, maintenance of views, accessibility, on- and off-site circulation, and maintenance of public parking spaces.
24. The site plan shall encourage alternatives to travel by automobile where appropriate, through the provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists, including covered parking for bicycles and motorcycles where appropriate. Public transit stops and facilities shall be accommodated as appropriate, and other incentive provisions considered which encourage non-auto travel.
The conditions of approval seek to preserve access to bike parking. .
25. The site shall provide open space and landscaping which complement buildings and structures. Open space should be useful to residents, employees, or other visitors to the site. Landscaping shall be used to separate and/or screen service and storage areas, separate and/or screen parking areas from other areas, break up expanses of paved area, and define open space for usability and privacy.
A condition of approval requires that locations of porta-potties, hand washing stations, and trash receptacles, as well as locations of overnight parking on the site, will take into account the adjacent uses, visibility, maintenance of views, accessibility, and maintenance of public parking spaces.
26. The site plan shall reasonably protect against external and internal noise, vibration and other factors, which may tend to make the environment less desirable.
The site plan should respect the need for privacy of adjacent residents.
The safe parking program has limited hours of operation and will generally be located in existing parking facilities within the City. Conditions of approval require adherence to established standards related to noise and other nuisance activities.
27. Signs shall complement the site plan and avoid dominating the site and/or existing buildings on the site or overwhelming the buildings or structures to which they are attached. Multiple signs on a given site should be of a consistent theme.
Conditions of approval require that new signage shall be small-scale and blend with other signage in existing parking facilities. Existing sign post shall be used when possible.
31.28 RESOLUTION NO.
28. Building and structures shall be so designed and oriented to make use of natural elements such as solar radiation, wind, and landscaping for heating, cooling and ventilation.
This finding does not apply, as no conditioned space will be constructed.
29. The site plan shall incorporate water-conservation features where possible, including in the design of types of landscaping and in the design of water-using fixtures. In addition, water restricting showerheads and faucets shall be used, as well as water-saving toilets utilizing less than three gallons per flush.
It is anticipated that portable restroom facilities will be provided at most safe parking locations, and such facilities minimize water use. Should permanent facilities be provided, water using fixtures will meet all applicable standards for minimizing water use.
30. In all projects in Industrial (I) Zones, all buildings and structures shall be so designed and oriented to make use of natural lighting wherever possible.
This finding does not apply, as new structures are not anticipated. If restroom structures are constructed in Industrial Zones, natural lighting will be considered in the design and orientation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz that it hereby acknowledges the Categorical Exemption and approves the Coastal Permit, and Design Permit to authorize the development associated with the amended municipal code pertaining to the parking of oversized vehicles and to implement City-wide safe parking programs for unhoused City residents living in oversized vehicles in the City of Santa Cruz subject to the Findings listed above and the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
31.29 RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVED: ______________________
Sonja Brunner, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
31.30 31.31
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR APPLICATION NO. CP21-0174
Coastal and Design Permits to authorize the development associated with amended municipal code pertaining to the parking of oversized vehicles (e.g., parking signage, time of use restrictions, etc.) and to implement City-wide safe parking programs for unhoused City residents living in oversized vehicles in the City of Santa Cruz.
1. If one or more of the following conditions related to the safe parking program is not met with respect to all its terms, Section 10.40.120(a) will not be enforced and then the approval of a safe parking program at a specified location may be revoked.
2. If, upon exercise of this permit, any developed safe parking site within the coastal zone is at any time determined by the Zoning Administrator to be incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood, revocation of, or amendment to, this permit by the Planning Commission could occur. Outside of the coastal zone the Design Permit, where required for a particular location, can be revoked or amended in accordance with the Santa Cruz Municipal Code.
1. The use shall meet the standards and shall be developed within limits established by Chapter
24.14 of the Santa Cruz Municipal Code as to the emission of noise, odor, smoke, dust, vibration, wastes, fumes or any public nuisance arising or occurring incidental to its establishment or operation.
2. The Safe Parking Program. As part of its consideration of the proposed development, a safe parking program as described in Section 10.40.120(m) of the Vehicles and Traffic Section of the Municipal Code framework shall be implemented by the City and remain in effect for the life of these permits. Site locations will include an up to date list of and options for sanitation and black water dumping. General parameters for the safe parking sites include:
● Off street locations (i.e. public/private parking lots). New signage shall be small-scale and designed to be incorporated into other signage in existing parking facilities. Existing sign post shall be used when possible.
● Hours generally shall be from 8:00 PM – 8:00 AM time frame. o Within the Coastal Zone, hours of operation shall be within this time frame, except that occasional, minor deviations from the 8:00 PM to 8:00 AM hours within the Coastal Zone may be allowed to facilitate provision of services to the program participants, so long as the additional hours are of a frequency, duration, and/or location such that they do not adversely interfere with coastal access. o Outside the Coastal Zone, facilities (for example, Tier 3 facilities where enhanced services are provided) may be operated with extended hours, including on a 24/7 basis, so long as plans adequately address required parking for other uses. ● Sanitation will be provided at all locations (i.e., porta-potties, hand washing stations, and garbage cans). Black water dumping facilities may be provided at some locations. All facilities shall, whenever possible, be located where no impacts to public vehicular or bike parking occur. When that is not possible, all facilities shall be located or operated in a manner so as to minimize vehicular and bike parking impacts to the greatest extent feasible. Locations of porta-potties, hand washing stations, and trash receptacles, as well as the locations of overnight parking on the site, will also take into account the adjacent uses, visibility, maintenance of views, on- and off-site circulation, and accessibility. ● Safe Parking sites will not be sited in mapped “high impact parking areas” within the Coastal Zone.
31.32 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Commission Meeting of March 3, 2022
SUBJECT: Oversized Vehicle Ordinance Implementation – Coastal Permit & Design Permit – Application No. CP21-0174