Agenda packet — Santa Cruz City Council, April 9, 2024 (part 1 of 2)

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, California 95060

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Regular Meeting - April 9, 2024
11:00 A.M. CLOSED SESSION, ZOOM/COURTYARD CONFERENCE ROOM 11:45 A.M. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, CONSENT, AND GENERAL BUSINESS,

ZOOM/COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The meeting may be viewed remotely, using any of the following sources:
 Click on Zoom link (no time delay): https://zoom.us/j/94684401344  Online at http://www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-council/council-meetings  Online at Watch – Community Television of Santa Cruz County  Comcast Channel 25
Or: Call any of the numbers below. If one is busy, try the next one.  1-833-548-0276 (Toll Free)
 1-833-548-0282 (Toll Free)
 1-877-853-5247 (Toll Free)
 1-669-900-9128
 Enter the meeting ID number: 946 8440 1344
 When prompted for a Participant ID, press #.
 Press *9 on your phone to “raise your hand” when the Mayor calls for public comment.  It will be your turn to speak when the Mayor calls on you. Press *6 to unmute yourself. The timer will then be set.

Correspondence to be included in the agenda packet must be received by 5:00 pm on Monday, April 8th
PLEASE NOTE:
 Council may take a break(s) as needed.
 Requests for extra speaking time on items other than Oral Communications must be made by 5:00 p.m. on Sunday, April 7th by emailing the Mayor and the City Clerk.

Approval will be confirmed via email.
[email protected] [email protected]
April 9, 2024 City Council 2
The City of Santa Cruz does not discriminate against persons with disabilities. Out of consideration for people with chemical sensitivities we ask that you attend fragrance free. Upon request, the agenda can be provided in a format to accommodate special needs. Additionally, if you wish to attend this public meeting and will require assistance such as an interpreter for American Sign Language, Spanish, or other special equipment, please call the City Clerk’s Department at 420-5030 at least five days in advance so that we can arrange for such special assistance, or email [email protected]. The CalRelay system number: 1-800-735-2922.

Si desea asistir a esta reunión pública y necesita ayuda - como un intérprete de lenguaje de señas americano, español u otro equipo especial - favor de llamar al Departamento de la Secretaría de la Ciudad al 420-5030 al menos cinco días antes para que podamos coordinar dicha asistencia especial o envié un correo electrónico a [email protected]. El número del sistema Cal-Relay es: 1-800-735-2922.

Agenda and Agenda Packet Materials: The City Council agenda and the complete agenda packet containing public records, which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, are available for review on the City’s website:
www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-council-meetings and at the Office of the City Clerk located at 809 Center Street, Room 8, Santa Cruz, California, during normal business hours.

Agenda Materials Submitted after Publication of the Agenda Packet: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5, public records related to an open session agenda item submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available at the same time they are distributed or made available to the legislative body on the City’s website at: www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-councilmeetings and are also available for public inspection at the Office of the City Clerk, 809 Center Street Room 8, Santa Cruz, California, during normal business hours, and at the Council meeting.

Need more information? Contact the City Clerk’s office at 831-420-5030. 11:00 AM
Statements of Disqualification
Closed Session

1. Conference With Legal Counsel – Liability Claims (Government Code §54956.95)
1) Claimant: Sally Ann Laine
2) Claimant: Mark S. Anderson
Claims against the City of Santa Cruz
April 9, 2024 City Council 3
Closed Session (continued)

2. Real Property Negotiations (Government Code §54956.8) Property: Approximately 8.15 acres located on Mount Hermon Road in Scotts Valley, CA
APNs: 022-721-07, 022-721-08, 022-721-09
Owner: City of Santa Cruz
City Negotiator: Bonnie Lipscomb
Negotiating Parties: City of Santa Cruz and City of Scotts Valley Under Negotiation: Price, terms of payment, or both

3. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Government Code §54956.9(d)(1))
Alicia Lopez v. Mary McCoy, et al.
(Santa Cruz County Superior Court Case No. 18CV03301)
April 9, 2024 City Council 4
City Council
11:45 AM
Call to Order
Roll Call
Oral Communications Announcement – Members of the public may address Council on matters not on the agenda, but within the jurisdiction of the Council. 30 minutes is allocated for Oral Communications. No extra time for groups will be granted.

Oral Communications
Presentations

4. Mayoral Proclamation Declaring April 2024 as Sexual Assault Awareness Month

5. Mayoral Proclamation Declaring April 2024 as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month

6. Mayoral Proclamation Declaring April 14, 2024 as Senderos Vive Oaxaca Day
Presiding Officer's Announcements
Statements of Disqualification
Additions and Deletions
City Attorney Report on Closed Session
April 9, 2024 City Council 5
Council Meeting Calendar

7. The City Council will review the meeting calendar attached to the agenda and revise it as necessary.

Consent Agenda

8. Resolution Extending the Emergency Declaration in Connection with the December 2023 and January and February 2024 Winter Storms (CA/CM)
Resolution extending by sixty days the Local Emergency Declaration in connection with the December 2023 and January and February 2024 winter storms.

9. Minutes of the March 26, 2024 City Council Meeting (CC) Motion to approve as submitted.

10. Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women Appointment (CC)
Motion to approve Councilmember Watkins’ nomination of Courtney Barrett to the Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women.

April 9, 2024 City Council 6
Consent Agenda (continued)

11. Certification of the March 5, 2024 Primary Election (CC) Resolution confirming and approving the canvass of ballots and returns for the City of Santa Cruz Primary Election held on March 5, 2024, and declaring the results.

12. Resolution Authorizing Staff to Work with City's Municipal Advisor to Secure Financing of $20M for Construction of the Parking Garage Component of the Downtown Library Affordable Housing Project (DLAHP) and Direct Staff to Assist the Affordable Housing Developer Partner with its California Tax Credit Allocation Request Application (EDH/FN/PW)
Motion to:
1) Adopt a resolution authorizing staff to work with the City’s Municipal Advisor to secure financing for the estimated total capital need of $20M, and
2) Direct staff to assist the affordable housing developer partner with its California Tax Credit Allocation Committee for their request for the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program by providing letters of funding commitments as needed including the parking garage component.

13. Liability Claims Filed Against the City of Santa Cruz (FN) Motion to reject the liability claims of 1) Sally Ann Laine and 2) Mark S.

Anderson, based on staff recommendation.

14. Naming of San Lorenzo Park Lawn Bowling Green (PR)
Motion to officially name the lawn bowling green in San Lorenzo Park the “Harry Schoenfeld Bowling Green.”
April 9, 2024 City Council 7
Consent Agenda (continued)

15. 733 River Street (former River Street Shelter Site) Demolition and Paving – Authorization of Work (PW/CM)
Motion to approve post-demolition paving work of the City-owned parcel at 733 River Street (former River Street Shelter) through a purchase order with Atlantis Paving in the amount of $121,906. The Public Works Director is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget.

16. Recycling Center Storm Water Treatment System Project - Request for Proposals and Authorization to Advertise and Award (PW) Motion to approve the plans and specifications, authorize staff to advertise and award a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Design, Build, and Maintenance Services for the Recycling Center Storm Water Treatment System Project (c402111). The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney, as authorized by Resolution No. NS-27,563. The Public Works Director is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget.

17. Resource Recovery Facility Tank Pad Installation Project (c402111) – Authorization to Advertise and Award (PW)
Motion to approve the plans and specifications for the Resource Recovery Facility Tank Pad Installation Project (c402111), authorize staff to advertise for bids, and award the contract. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney, and as authorized by Resolution No. NS27,563. The Director of Public Works is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget.

April 9, 2024 City Council 8
Consent Agenda (continued)

18. Wastewater Treatment Facility Headworks Rehabilitation (c402204) – Authorization to Advertise and Award Contract (PW)
Motion to approve the plans and specifications for the Wastewater Treatment Facility Headworks Rehabilitation (c402204), authorize staff to advertise for bids, and award the contract. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney, and as authorized by Resolution No. NS27,563. The Director of Public Works is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget.

End Consent Agenda
General Business

19. CalPERS Contract Amendment (HR)
Motion to:
1) Adopt a resolution declaring the Council’s intention to approve an amendment to its contract with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) to provide for a new local ocean beach lifeguard member category with Section 7522.25(d) (2.7% @ 57 Full formula), and Section 21574 (Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) with 0% prior service, and
2) Introduce for publication an ordinance approving an amendment to the contract between the Board of Administration and California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) to provide a new local ocean beach lifeguard member category 2.7% at 57 full formula and Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits with 0% prior service.

April 9, 2024 City Council 9
General Business (continued)

20. West Cliff 50-year Vision, Grant Application for West Cliff Dr. Pilot (including One-way Vehicle with Dedicated Bike and Pedestrian Lanes), and Lighthouse Point Study (CM/PW)
Motion to:
1) Comment on and adopt the West Cliff 50-year Community Vision; 2) Receive updates on Public Works infrastructure projects related to West Cliff;
3) Adopt a resolution authorizing and directing staff to apply for, accept, and appropriate grant funds for a West Cliff Dr. pilot (Pilot) to test and explore a transportation option that includes one-way vehicle access with dedicated bike and pedestrian lanes and neighborhood traffic calming, in the amount not to exceed $3.5 million and from the California Active Transportation Program Quick Build Program, a grant program administered by the California Department of Transportation, and authorize the City Manager to execute, in forms approved by the City Attorney, any agreements or amendments necessary for the application and acceptance;
4) Direct staff to return to Council with quantitative and qualitative data from the Pilot at six months after Pilot begins, and every six months thereafter; and
5) Direct staff to complete a geologic hazard analysis and preliminary engineering study for Lighthouse Point.

21. Emergency Ordinance Imposing a Temporary Moratorium on the Establishment of New Commercial Cannabis Businesses in the City of Santa Cruz (CN)
Motion to adopt a temporary emergency ordinance to protect health, safety, and welfare by preventing the establishment of new cannabis businesses in the City of Santa Cruz to provide an opportunity to examine the City’s current system of licensing and permitting cannabis-related businesses and consider potential amendments to that system.

Adjournment
April 9, 2024 City Council 10

INFORMATION ITEMS PREVIOUSLY DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCILMEMBERS None issued.

MAYOR'S PROCLAMATIONS
ADDENDUM TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – APRIL 9, 2024

22. Proclaiming March 22, 2024 as “Your Future Is Our Business 30th Anniversary Day” and encouraging all citizens to join in congratulating it for its long history of linking students to careers and expressing heartfelt appreciation for its dedication to providing every Santa Cruz County student with the opportunity to forge a path to a fulfilling and successful career.

23. Proclaiming March 26, 2024 as “Santa Cruz Antique Faire Appreciation Day” and encouraging all citizens to join in honoring Bonnie Belcher with gratitude for keeping this Santa Cruz tradition going for two decades.

24. Proclaiming the month of March 2024 as “Procurement Month.”

25. Proclaiming the month of March as “Women’s History Month” and inviting all citizens to celebrate these ten local women on March 28, 2024 and thereafter for their contributions to improving our community.

Advisory Body Appointments
The following positions are either currently vacant or the terms are due to expire.

Council will make the appointments at a future meeting.

County Latino Affairs Commission One opening – at-large nomination April 9, 2024 City Council 11
Public Hearing
If, in the future, you wish to challenge in court any of the matters on this agenda for which a public hearing is to be conducted, you may be limited to raising only those issues which you (or someone else) raised orally at the public hearing or in written correspondence received by the City at or before the hearing.

Any person seeking to challenge a City Council decision made as a result of a proceeding in which, by law, a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action either 60 days or 90 days following the date on which the decision becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 Please refer to code of Civil Procedure 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes “final.” The 60-day rule applies to all public hearings conducted pursuant to the City’s Zoning Ordinance, Title 24, Santa Cruz Municipal Code. The 90-day rule applies to all other public hearings.

6.1 Meeting Type
Holiday
Jewish Holiday
Regular Meeting
Special Meeting (will be added as scheduled)
Study Session (will be added as scheduled)
Budget Hearing
DATE Location Meeting Type
April 22/23
Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public May 27
Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public May 29 Council Chambers Budget Hearing
Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public June 19
Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public July 4
Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public September 2
Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public October 2/3
Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public October 11/12
Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public November 11
Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public November 28
November 29
Courtyard Conf. Room Closed Session - Closed to the Public Council Chambers Council Regular Meeting - Open to the Public December 25/26
December 24 Meeting Cancelled - CITY COUNCIL DARK
Rosh Hashanah (City observed - sundown to sundown)
November 12
October 8
October 22
City Hall Closure - Veteran's Day (observed)
Hanukkah (City observed - sundown to sundown)
Yom Kippur (City observed - sundown to sundown)
City Hall Closure - Labor Day
August 27
July 9 and 23 Meetings Cancelled - CITY COUNCIL DARK
City Hall Closure - Independence Day
City Hall Closure - Memorial Day
Passover (City observed - sundown to sundown)
August 13
May 14
April 30
June 11
May 28
City Council Meeting Calendar for 2024
November 26
December 10
City Hall Closure - Thanksgiving Day
City Hall Closure - Day After Thanksgiving Day
June 25
September 10
September 24
City Hall Closure - Juneteenth
Please note: Meeting times are not final and are likely to change

7.1 Meeting Type
Holiday
Jewish Holiday
Regular Meeting
Special Meeting (will be added as scheduled)
Study Session (will be added as scheduled)
Budget Hearing
DATE Location Meeting Type

City Council Meeting Calendar for 2024
Please note: Meeting times are not final and are likely to change December 25 City Hall Closure - Christmas Day

7.2 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 03/21/2024
AGENDA OF: 04/09/2024
DEPARTMENT: City Attorney/City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution Extending the Emergency Declaration in Connection with the December 2023 and January and February 2024 Winter Storms (CA/CM) RECOMMENDATION: Resolution extending by sixty days the Local Emergency Declaration in connection with the December 2023 and January and February 2024 winter storms.

BACKGROUND: Storms in December 2023 and January and February 2024 have caused significant flooding and other storm impacts, including damage to property within the City of Santa Cruz, and impacts to persons experiencing homelessness. On February 6, 2024, the City Manager issued a “Proclamation of Existence of Local Emergency.” DISCUSSION: Government Code section 8630 authorizes a governing body of a city or an official designated by ordinance to proclaim the existence of a local emergency. Santa Cruz Municipal Code section 2.20.030 empowers the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City is affected or likely to be affected by a public calamity or disaster, subject to confirmation by the City Council at the “earliest practicable time.” During the existence of such emergency, the Director of Emergency Services is also authorized, pursuant to Section 2.20.040(1), to “[m]ake and issue rules and regulations on matters reasonably related to the protection of life and property as affected by such emergency,” also subject to confirmation by the City Council “at the earliest practicable time.”
In view of the facts and circumstances described above, on February 6, 2024, the City Manager declared the existence of a local emergency in the City of Santa Cruz. The City Council ratified the emergency declaration by Resolution No. NS-30,286 at its February 13, 2024 regular meeting.

The attached resolution, if adopted by the City Council, would extend the emergency declaration related to the December 2023 and January and February 2024 winter storms by an additional 60 days, to June 8, 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT: Actions taken by the City during a declared emergency are potentially recoverable from Cal OES (California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services) and FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency).

8.1 Prepared By:

Stephanie Duck
Deputy City Attorney
Submitted By:

Tony Condotti
City Attorney
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. RESOLUTION.DOCX

8.2 RESOLUTION NO. NS-XX,XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ EXTENDING

THE LOCAL EMERGENCY DECLARATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE DECEMBER 2023 AND JANUARY AND FEBRUARY 2024 WINTER STORMS
WHEREAS, Government Code section 8630 authorizes the City Council or an official designated by ordinance to proclaim the existence of a local emergency; and WHEREAS, Santa Cruz Municipal Code section 2.20.030 empowers the City Manager, as the director of emergency services, to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City is affected or likely to be affected by a public calamity, subject to confirmation by the City Council at the earliest practicable time; and WHEREAS, on December 28 and 30th, 2023, the City of Santa Cruz experienced a large winter swell event involving significant rain and hazardous ocean conditions, causing an estimate of $2.5 million in damage along West Cliff Drive and the Santa Cruz Wharf (the “December 2023 Winter Storm”); and
WHEREAS, the Santa Cruz region continued to experience heavy rainfall characterized as atmospheric river storms throughout January and February 2024 (January and February 2024 Winter Storms); and
WHEREAS, the January 2024 Winter Storms included significant rainfall on January 22, 2024 that contributed to flooding within the City of Santa Cruz and specifically to Cypress Point Apartments; and
WHEREAS, soil conditions in the City of Santa Cruz remain saturated as a result of the December 2023 Winter Storm and January and February 2024 Winter Storms, with rainfall expected to continue, increasing the potential for flooding and other storm impacts, including downed trees, power outages, mudslides, erosion, and impacts to persons experiencing homelessness; and
WHEREAS, on January 30, 2024, the County of Santa Cruz Board of Supervisors ratified Local Emergency for the December 2023 Coastal Storms, as proclaimed by the County Administrative Officer as the Director of Emergency Services on January 3, 2024; and WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing and pursuant to his authority as Emergency Services Director, on February 6, 2024, the City Manager declared the existence of a local emergency (the "Emergency Proclamation"); and
WHEREAS, at its February 6, 2024 meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No.

NS-30,286 declaring the existence of a State of Emergency in connection with the December 2023 and January and February 2024 winter storms, confirming the February 6, 2024 Emergency Proclamation by the Director of Emergency Services; and

8.3 2
WHEREAS, damage to City infrastructure from the December 2023 and January and February 2024 winter storms is extensive and as a result, the City’s emergency response to the December 2023 and January and February 2024 winter storms will likely be ongoing.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz (City Council) as follows:

A. That the City Council hereby declares that the local emergency declaration adopted at its February 6, 2024 regular meeting by Resolution No. February 6, 2024, shall be extended an additional sixty (60) days from its adoption pursuant to California Government Code Section 8630, et seq., by this Resolution; and
B. This Resolution shall remain in full force and effect and shall thereafter terminate on the sixtieth (60th) day after its adoption, unless earlier terminated or further extended by subsequent City Council action.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of April 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: __________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

8.4 MINUTES ARE UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED BY COUNCIL
City of Santa Cruz
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, California 95060

MINUTES OF A CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 26, 2024
12:00 PM
Mayor Keeley opened the City Council Closed Session at 12:02 p.m. in a public meeting via Zoom and in Council Chambers, for the purpose of announcing the agenda, and receiving public testimony.

Roll Call

Present: Councilmembers Newsome, Brown, Watkins, Kalantari-Johnson; Vice Mayor Golder; Mayor Keeley.

Absent: Councilmember Brunner.

Staff: City Manager M. Huffaker, Director of Economic Development and Housing B. Lipscomb, Finance Director E. Cabell, City Attorney T.

Condotti, Deputy City Clerk Administrator J. Wood, City Clerk Administrator B. Bush.

Statements of Disqualification – None.

Public Comment
Mayor Keeley opened the public comment period at 12:03 p.m. There were no speakers. Mayor Keeley closed the public comment period at 12:03 p.m., at which time the meeting was closed to the public and Council adjourned to the Courtyard Conference Room.

9.1 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6770
Closed Session

1. Conference With Legal Counsel – Liability Claims (Government Code §54956.95) 1) Claimant: Liberty Mutual
2) Claimant: CSAA Insurance Exchange
Claims against the City of Santa Cruz
Council received a status report, took up under agenda item 13, and no reportable action was taken.

2. Real Property Negotiations (Government Code §54956.8) 1) Property: Approximately 8.15 acres located on Mount Hermon Road in Scotts Valley, CA
APNs: 022-721-07, 022-721-08, 022-721-09
Owner: City of Santa Cruz
City Negotiator: Bonnie Lipscomb
Negotiating Parties: City of Santa Cruz and City of Scotts Valley Under Negotiation: Price, terms of payment, or both
2) Property: 302 and 326 Front Street
APNs: 005-151-48 and 005-151-35
Owner: City of Santa Cruz
City Negotiator: Bonnie Lipscomb
Negotiating Parties: City of Santa Cruz and SCFS Venture LLC Under Negotiation: Price, terms of payment, or both
Council received a status report from the City Negotiator, took up item 2.2 under agenda items 25.1 and 25.2, and no reportable action was taken.

9.2 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6771
Closed Session (continued)

4. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (Government Code §54956.9(d)(2))
Significant exposure to litigation (one potential case to be discussed) Council received a status report, and no reportable action was taken.

9.3 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6772
City of Santa Cruz
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, California 95060

MINUTES OF A CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 26, 2024
1:15 PM
Call to Order – Mayor Keeley called the meeting to order at 1:33 p.m. in Council Chambers.

Roll Call

Present: Councilmembers Newsome, Brown, Watkins, Kalantari-Johnson; Vice Mayor Golder; Mayor Keeley.

Absent: Councilmember Brunner.

Staff: City Manager M. Huffaker, City Attorney T. Condotti, Director of Parks and Recreation T. Elliot, Finance Director E. Cabell, Director of Economic Development and Housing B. Lipscomb, Director of Planning and Community Development L. Butler, Director of Information Technology K. Morgan, Director of Public Works N. Nguyen, Chief People Officer S. De Leon, Water Director H. Luckenbach (via Zoom), Deputy City Manager L. Murphy (via Zoom), Purchasing Manager E. Millwee, Recreation Superintendent T. Hedden-Jones, Senior Planner R. Bane, Deputy City Clerk Administrator J. Wood, City Clerk Administrator B.

Bush.

Oral Communications Announcement - The Mayor provided a brief announcement about Oral Communications.

Oral Communications
At 1:34 p.m. Mayor Keeley opened Oral Communications for members of the public who wished to speak regarding items not listed on the City Council agenda.

Unidentified person spoke regarding a fruit cart vendor in their neighborhood.

Unidentified person spoke regarding the measures on the March 2024 ballot and the use of tax funds in general.

9.4 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6773
Oral Communications (continued)
Bradley Snyder spoke regarding the acceptance rate at UCSC and the low rate of local students that are accepted.

At 1:42 p.m. Mayor Keeley closed Oral Communications.

Presentations

5. Mayoral Proclamation Declaring March 2024 as Procurement Month Councilmember Brown read from and presented a proclamation to Purchasing Manager E. Millwee and Buyer I L. Lane, declaring March 2024 as Procurement Month. Purchasing Manager E. Millwee spoke.

6. Mayoral Proclamation Declaring March 26, 2024, as Santa Cruz Antiques Faire Appreciation Day
Councilmember Newsome read from and presented a proclamation to Antiques Faire organizer Bonnie Belcher, declaring March 26, 2024, as Santa Cruz Antiques Fair Appreciation Day.

7. Clam Chowder Cook-off Update
Director of Parks and Recreation T. Elliot, Recreation Superintendent T.

Hedden-Jones, and Kris Reyes, Director of External Affairs at the Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk, provided an update on the Clam Chowder Cook-off.

Presiding Officer's Announcements
Statements of Disqualification – None.

Additions and Deletions – None.

City Attorney Report on Closed Session – See pages 6770-6771 for the report.

Council Meeting Calendar

8. The City Council reviewed and did not revise the meeting calendar attached to the agenda.

9.5 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6774
Consent Agenda
Councilmember Kalantari-Johnson made a comment on items 16 and 17.

Vice Mayor Golder made a comment on item 16.

Councilmember Watkins pulled item 15 for further discussion and made a comment on items 16 and 17.

Councilmember Brown pulled items 10 and 12 for further discussion.

Councilmember Newsome made a comment on items 16, 17, and 18.

Mayor Keeley opened the public comment period. The following people spoke:

Rachel Kippen spoke regarding item 17.

Sabrina Brennan spoke regarding item 17.

Mayor Keeley closed the public comment period.

MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember Watkins, to approve the remaining Consent Agenda.

ACTION: The motion carried with the following vote.

AYES: Councilmembers Newsome, Brown, Watkins, Kalantari-Johnson; Vice Mayor Golder; Mayor Keeley.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: Councilmember Brunner.

DISQUALIFIED: None.

Staff Assignments:

Publish a press release about how Santa Cruz is the second city to take action on supporting equal playing time, location, venue conditions, and prize compensation for sporting events, and hopefully inspire other jurisdictions to do the same.

9. Minutes of the March 12, 2024 City Council Meeting (CC) Motion carried to approve as submitted.

9.6 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6775
Consent Agenda (continued)

10. Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC), Infill Infrastructure Grant (IIG) and Set-Aside Administrative Approvals (EDH)
Director of Economic Development and Housing B. Lipscomb responded to Council questions.

Mayor Keeley opened the public comment period. The following people spoke.

John Hall
Alberto Lustre
Unidentified person
Mayor Keeley closed the public comment period.

MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember Watkins, to:
 Authorize the City Manager to execute project loan contracts, loan agreements and related loan and grant documents related to the City’s Federal Set-Aside for Pacific Station North and the Downtown Library Affordable Housing Project;
 Authorize the City Manager to execute program/project contracts, loan agreements and related loan documents with Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC) and Infill Infrastructure Grants (IIG) and related documents for distributions of funds to the projects and programs;  Adopt Resolution No. NS-30,303 approving the FY 2024 AHSC, IIG and SetAside budget adjustment allocating AHSC, IIG and Set-Aside funds and appropriating the funds in the FY 2024 budget; and
 Direct staff to return to Council with a comprehensive update for the Downtown Library Affordable Housing Project, including the current budget, funding sources and expenditures for all components of the project, including incorporating cost escalation, and revised project timeline.

ACTION: The motion carried with the following vote.

AYES: Councilmembers Newsome, Brown, Watkins, KalantariJohnson; Vice Mayor Golder; Mayor Keeley.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: Councilmember Brunner.

DISQUALIFIED: None.

9.7 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6776
Consent Agenda (continued)

11. Three-Month Extension of Lease for Central Home Supply (EDH) Motion carried authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Lease Agreement with Santee Corporation dba Central Home Supply, providing a three-month extension of the lease term for the property located at 744 and 808 River Street, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

12. Griffin Structures: Owner’s Representative for the Downtown Library Affordable Housing Project – Change Order (EDH)
Council questions were responded to, and public comment was heard during item 10.

MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember Watkins, to approve a purchase order change order with Griffin Structures, Inc. (Santa Clara, CA) for serving as the Owner’s Representative on the Downtown Library Affordable Housing Project (DLAHP) and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute a change order in the amount of $111,115 and any related documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Economic Development and Housing Director is further authorized to execute future change orders within the approved budget.

ACTION: The motion carried with the following vote.

AYES: Councilmembers Newsome, Brown, Watkins, KalantariJohnson; Vice Mayor Golder; Mayor Keeley.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: Councilmember Brunner.

DISQUALIFIED: None.

13. Liability Claims Filed Against the City of Santa Cruz (FN) Motion carried to reject the liability claims of 1) Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and 2) CSAA Insurance Exchange, based on staff recommendation.

14. Statement of Investment and Portfolio Policy (FN)
Motion carried to approve the Statement of Investment and Portfolio Policy.

9.8 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6777
Consent Agenda (continued)

15. 2021 Compensation Study, Phase III Follow-up (FN/HR) Chief People Officer S. De Leon responded to Council questions.

Mayor Keeley opened the public comment period. The following people spoke.

Ken Bare
Emilio Galvan
Mayor Keeley closed the public comment period.

MOTION: Councilmember Watkins moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Golder, to:
 Approve Phase III Compensation Study (Study) implementation, which includes classification compensation increases as identified in the 2021 Study, as part of FY 2024, effective April 13, 2024;
 Adopt Resolution No. NS-30,304 amending the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan for multiple departments, as identified in Exhibit A; and  Adopt Resolution No. NS-30,305 amending the FY 2024 budget allocating funding for Phase III as detailed in the Budget Adjustment Attachment 1-3- month and Annual Costs for Phase III.

ACTION: The motion carried with the following vote.

AYES: Councilmembers Newsome, Brown, Watkins, KalantariJohnson; Vice Mayor Golder; Mayor Keeley.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: Councilmember Brunner.

DISQUALIFIED: None.

16. Annual Housing Element and General Plan Progress Reports (PL) Motion carried to accept the 2023 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Reports, and direct staff to submit the reports to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research and the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

9.9 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6778
Consent Agenda (continued)

17. Pay and Play Equity in Sport Competition Permitting (PR) Motion carried to:
 Adopt Resolution No. NS-30,306 supporting equal playing time, location, venue conditions, and prize compensation for sporting events permitted by the City of Santa Cruz; and
 Direct staff to update the special event permit application language and event permit condition language for sports competition permits.

18. Beach Street Restrooms (c301913) – 2nd Amendment to Agreement for Architectural and Engineering Services for Beach Street Public Restroom and Budget Adjustment (PR)
Motion carried to:
 Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a second amendment for $15,000 to the Professional Services Agreement with Gelfand Partners Architects Inc. for architectural and engineering services to renovate the Beach Street Restroom at 120 Beach Street, in a form approved by the City Attorney, bringing the total amount to $112,900. The Director of Parks and Recreation is authorized to execute contract amendments within the approved project budget; and
 Adopt Resolution No. NS-30,307 amending the FY 2024 budget and appropriate $65,000 from the Parks Facilities Tax Fund account and amend the Parks and Recreation Capital Investment Program budget from $351,183 to $416,183 in c301913, Beach Street Restrooms.

19. West Cliff Drive Stabilization Project (c401501) – Contract Amendment (PW) Motion carried to approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract amendment with Pacific Crest Engineering (Watsonville, CA) for ongoing observation and testing services for the West Cliff Drive Stabilization Project (c401501), in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Public Works Director is authorized to execute contract amendments within the approved project budget.

9.10 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6779
Consent Agenda (continued)

20. Emergency San Lorenzo River Levee Repair (e602401) – Authorization of Emergency Work (PW)
Motion carried to ratify emergency work through a purchase order with Granite Rock Co. (Watsonville, CA) for repair of the San Lorenzo River Levee in the amount of $227,705. The Public Works Director is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget.

21. Emergency Hagemann Aerial Sewer Repair (c401511) – Authorization of Emergency Work (PW)
Motion carried to ratify emergency work through a purchase order with Precision Grade, Inc. (Salinas, CA) for inspection and repair of the Hagemann Aerial Sewer Main in the amount of $300,000. The Public Works Director is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget.

22. Retaining Wall Reconstruction Project - 141 Archer Drive (g402402) - Authorization to Advertise for Bids and Award Contract (PW) Motion carried to approve the plans and specifications for the Retaining Wall Reconstruction Project – 141 Archer Drive (g402402), authorize staff to advertise for bids, and award the contract. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Director of Public Works is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget.

9.11 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6780
Consent Agenda (continued)

23. Beltz 12 Phase II Ammonia Removal Improvements Project – Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Advertise for Bids and Award Contract – Budget Adjustment (WT)
Motion carried to:
 Approve the Plans and Specifications for the Beltz 12 Phase II Ammonia Removal Improvements Project (c702203) and authorize staff to advertise for bids and the Water Director to execute change orders within the approved project budget. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract as authorized by Resolution No. NS-27,563; and
 Adopt Resolution No. NS-30,308 transferring $215,000 within Water’s Capital Investment Program, from project c701606 for the Newell Creek Dam Inlet/Outlet Replacement Project to project c702203 for the Beltz 12 Phase II Ammonia Removal Improvements Project.

End Consent Agenda
Public Hearings

24. 2nd Reading and Final Adoption of Ordinance No. 2024-07 Amending Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 13.12 (CA/PR)
Mayor Keeley opened the public comment period. There were no speakers.

Mayor Keeley closed the public comment period.

MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember Kalantari-Johnson, to adopt Ordinance No. 2024-07 amending Chapter 13.12 of the Santa Cruz Municipal Code relating to City-owned parks and recreational facilities in response to amendments to Health and Safety Code section 115800.

ACTION: The motion carried with the following vote.

AYES: Councilmembers Newsome, Brown, Watkins, KalantariJohnson; Vice Mayor Golder; Mayor Keeley.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: Councilmember Brunner.

DISQUALIFIED: None.

9.12 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6781
Public Hearings (continued)

25. Cruz Hotel
Director of Planning and Community Development L. Butler introduced the item and responded to Council questions.

Senior Planner R. Bane gave a presentation.

Director of Economic Development and Housing B. Lipscomb gave a presentation and responded to Council questions.

Mayor Keeley opened the public comment period. The following people spoke.

Joaquin Benitez
Hector Azpilcueta
Unidentified person
Celica Valdez
Unidentified person
Nicholas Whitehead
Unidentified person
Josephine Garcia
Jordan Sisson
[Unintelligible name]
Nora Hochman
Alberto Lustre
Grant Wilson
Joy Schendledecker
Owen Lawlor
Mayor Keeley closed the public comment period.

Owen Lawlor, Co-GP Managing Member of SCFS Ventures, LLC, and Frank Petrilli, Partner with Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass LLP, responded to Council questions.

9.13 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6782
Public Hearings (continued)

25. Cruz Hotel (continued)

25.1 302, 310, 314, 322, 324, 326, 328 Front Street: CP21-0051 (APN 005-151-29, - 34, -35, -43, -48, -51) Coastal Permit, Non-Residential Demolition Authorization Permit, Design Permit, Boundary (Lot) Line Adjustments, Special Use Permit, Administrative Use Permit, Additional Height Request, Revocable License for Outdoor Extension Area, and a Heritage Tree Removal Permit, to Demolish a Commercial Building, Combine Five Parcels, and Construct a SixStory, 232-Room Hotel with Ground Floor Retail, Banquet and Conference Space, Restaurant, and Bar on Property Located within the CBD (Central Business District)/CZ-O (Coastal Zone Overlay)/ SP-O (Shoreline Protection Overlay)/ F-P (Floodplain)/FP-O (Floodplain Overlay) Zone District and within the Front Street/Riverfront Subarea of the Downtown Plan. The Project Requires Approval of a Section 408 Permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers to Allow for the Placement of Fill Between the Levee and the Proposed Building and to Allow for the Development of an Outdoor Extension Area Adjacent to the Riverway Path. The Project Also Includes a Finding that the Sale of the Exempt Surplus Properties is Consistent with the General Plan in Accordance with the Surplus Lands Act. (Environmental Determination: Categorical Exemption, Section 15332). Applicant: SCFS Venture LLC (PL)

9.14 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6783
Public Hearings (continued)

25. Cruz Hotel (continued)

25.1 302, 310, 314, 322, 324, 326, 328 Front Street (PL) (continued)

25.2 Consideration of an Option and Purchase Sale Agreement Between the City of Santa Cruz and SCFS Venture LLC for the City-owned Property, Located at 302 and 326 Front Street, North of the Intersection with Laurel Street, APNs 005- 151-48 and 005-151-35 (EDH) (continued)
MOTION (continued):
2) Adopt Resolution No. NS-30,310 authorizing and directing the City Manager to execute an Option Purchase and Sale Agreement between the City of Santa Cruz and SCFS Venture LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, for the purchase of City-owned property located at 302 and 326 Front Street, in a form approved by the City Attorney subject to any nonsubstantive changes, with the following amendments, and to take any further actions and authorize the City Manager to execute any other related documents necessary to conclude the sale:
 Amend Section 6(g) Conditions to Seller’s Obligations The Project shall have received "Final Entitlement Approval," which for purposes of this Agreement means the later of the following: (i) the date which is ninety (90) days after receipt of the Project Entitlements, as defined in the Recitals, (ii) if any appeal from the Project Entitlements is filed with the California Coastal Commission, the date which is ninety (90) days following the date on which the appeal is resolved in a manner acceptable to Buyer as determined by Buyer in Buyer’s sole discretion, or (iii) if litigation against the Project Entitlements is commenced within ninety (90) days following approval of the Project Entitlements or resolution of any appeal taken to the California Coastal Commission, the date on which the litigation is resolved in a manner reasonably acceptable to Seller as determined by Seller in Seller’s reasonable discretion. intentionally blank.

9.15 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6784
Public Hearings (continued)

25. Cruz Hotel (continued)

25.1 302, 310, 314, 322, 324, 326, 328 Front Street (PL) (continued)

Buyer acknowledges the protections in California Civil Code Section 1542 regarding the waiver and release provided herein, which states:
“A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT THE

CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO

EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE

AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER, WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY

AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY.”
By initialing below, Buyer knowingly and voluntarily waives the provisions of Section 1542 in connection the waiver and release of this Section 9(g)(ii). However, the foregoing provisions of this Section 9(g)(ii) shall not serve to release Seller from any claim for fraud against Seller.

9.16 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6785
Public Hearings (continued)

25. Cruz Hotel (continued)

25.1 302, 310, 314, 322, 324, 326, 328 Front Street (PL) (continued)

25.2 Consideration of an Option and Purchase Sale Agreement Between the City of Santa Cruz and SCFS Venture LLC for the City-owned Property, Located at 302 and 326 Front Street, North of the Intersection with Laurel Street, APNs 005- 151-48 and 005-151-35 (EDH) (continued)
MOTION (continued):
 Amend Section 13 Covenants of Seller and Buyer:
(b) Covenants of Buyer:
(iii) Prior to Closing, Buyer shall execute an enforceable commitment, secured by a performance bond or other security instrument approved by Seller in its reasonable discretion, to pay all applicable impact fees and other fees due and pull a building permit for construction of the Project within forty-five (45) days after Closing.
 Direct staff to deposit the sale proceeds and additional consideration into the Affordable Housing Trust Fund;
 Direct staff to explore options for designating a portion of the sale proceeds, additional consideration, and future Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenue from the hotel for the following three affordable housing programs funded by the City and administered by City partners: the Security Deposit Program, the Emergency Rental Assistance Program, and the Landlord incentive Program/Owner Assurance Program, with the goal of broadening the reach of the programs and the level of assistance received by recipients and to make such program changes, as necessary, in order to achieve these goals. Such changes may include, but not be limited to, the following:
 Conversion of program funding from loans to grants (Security Deposit Program);
 Increase term of assistance (Security Deposit Program);  Increased funding when needed to provide assistance for additional recipients (all programs); and
 Lowering the threshold to qualify for assistance (all programs).

9.17 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6786
Public Hearings (continued)

25. Cruz Hotel (continued)

25.1 302, 310, 314, 322, 324, 326, 328 Front Street (PL) (continued)

The applicant shall develop an employee parking plan in consultation with City staff that shall be finalized prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The plan shall permit the use of onsite parking spaces for hotel employees as capacity allows, and shall provide for low- or no-cost parking options for employees when onsite parking is not available; and  Amend Condition 77(c):

From:

Prior to final occupancy the applicant shall provide the City of Santa Cruz with a one-time contribution in the amount of $50,000 to the City’s “Santa Cruzer” downtown and beach shuttle program.

To:

The applicant shall provide an annual payment of $10,000 for a period of ten years to the City of Santa Cruz to fund the City’s “Santa Cruzer” downtown and beach shuttle program.

Councilmember Newsome accepted.

FRIENDLY AMENDMENT: Councilmember Brown requested to increase the affordable housing in-lieu fee from $5 per square-foot to $10 per square-foot to get one unit of affordable housing.

Councilmembers Newsome and Kalantari-Johnson did not accept.

9.18 March 26, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6787
Public Hearings (continued)

25. Cruz Hotel (continued)

25.1 302, 310, 314, 322, 324, 326, 328 Front Street (PL) (continued)

AYES: Councilmembers Newsome, Watkins, Kalantari-Johnson; Vice Mayor Golder; Mayor Keeley.

NOES: Councilmember Brown.

ABSENT: Councilmember Brunner.

DISQUALIFIED: None.

Adjournment – Vice Mayor Golder moved, seconded by Councilmember Watkins, to adjourn. By consensus City Council adjourned at 4:47 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted:

Julia Wood, Deputy City Clerk Administrator
Attest:

Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
Approved:

Fred Keeley, Mayor

9.19 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 03/27/2024
AGENDA OF: 04/09/2024
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
SUBJECT: Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women Appointment (CC)
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve Councilmember Watkins’ nomination of Courtney Barrett to the Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women.

BACKGROUND: The Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women is comprised of members who have been nominated by each Councilmember. When a new Councilmember is elected, or if there is a vacancy for any reason, new commissioners must be nominated.

DISCUSSION: Councilmember Watkins has a nomination to the Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women, which Council must vote to approve. Councilmember Watkins would like to nominate Courtney Barrett to a term ending January 31, 2025, eligible for reappointment.

FISCAL IMPACT: None.

Prepared By:

Bonnie Bush
City Clerk
Submitted By:

Laura Schmidt
Assistant City Manager
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. APPLICATION.PDF

10.1 10.2

10.3 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 03/19/2024
AGENDA OF: 04/09/2024
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
SUBJECT: Certification of the March 5, 2024 Primary Election (CC) RECOMMENDATION: Resolution confirming and approving the canvass of ballots and returns for the City of Santa Cruz Primary Election held on March 5, 2024, and declaring the results.
_________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND: At the meeting of August 8, 2023, Resolution No. NS-30,174 was adopted for the purpose of electing Councilmembers for Districts 1, 2, 3, and 5. At the meeting of November 8, 2023, Resolution No. NS-30,245 was adopted for the purpose of placing a measure on the ballot to impose a retail transactions and use tax. At the meeting of November 28, 2023, Resolution No. NS-30, 240 was adopted for the purpose of placing a citizen initiative measure on the ballot (Housing for People).

DISCUSSION: On March 5, 2024, the Primary Election was held in accordance with law and the votes were cast. The County Clerk certified the results of the election (Exhibit A – Statement of Vote).

The following candidates for Districts 1, 2, 3, and 5 were elected, receiving the higher number of votes.
• Gabriela Trigueiro, District 1
• Sonja Brunner, District 2
• Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson, District 3
• Susie O’Hara, District 5
Measure L, a Retail Transactions and Use Tax/Sales and Use Tax, passed, with a majority of the votes in support of the measure.

Measure M, a citizen initiative ballot measure, Housing for People, failed, with a majority of the votes against the measure.

FISCAL IMPACT: None.

Prepared By:

Bonnie Bush
City Clerk
Submitted By:

Laura Schmidt
Assistant City Manager
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager

11.1 ATTACHMENTS:

1. RESOLUTION.DOC

2. EXHIBIT A - STATEMENT OF VOTE.PDF

11.2 RESOLUTION NO. NSA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ

CONFIRMING AND APPROVING THE CANVASS OF BALLOTS AND RETURNS FOR THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ PRIMARY ELECTION HELD ON MARCH 5, 2024 AND

DECLARING THE RESULTS
WHEREAS, at the meeting of August 8, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. NS-30,174 calling for an election in the City of Santa Cruz for the purpose of electing Councilmembers for Districts 1, 2, 3, and 5; and
WHEREAS, at the meeting of November 28, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. NS-30,240 and NS-30,245 for the purpose of placing 1) a measure to enact a retail transactions and use tax, and 2) a citizen initiative entitled Housing for People, on the ballot, respectively; and
WHEREAS, on March 5, 2024, the election so called and ordered was held in accordance with law and the votes were counted; and
WHEREAS, the County Clerk has certified the results of the election.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz that it hereby certifies the following:

1. The Primary Election referred to above was held in the City of Santa Cruz on March 5, 2024.

2. The certified canvass of returns is set forth in Exhibit “A” and incorporated by reference.

3. A measure to enact a one-half percent sales tax was submitted to the voters and the votes were cast for and against the measure as follows:

L – Retail Transactions and Use Tax Vote Count Percent
No 6,993 38.22%
Yes 11,302 61.78%
A majority of the votes cast were in support of this ballot measure, therefore the measure (Measure L) passed.

4. A citizen initiative ballot measure proposing an ordinance amending the City’s Municipal Code to require prior voter approval for any amendment to the General Plan or Zoning regulations to increase height limits or floor area ratios, and increasing inclusionary housing requirements from 20% to at least 25% for developments with 30 or more

11.3 RESOLUTION NO. NShousing units was submitted to the voters and the votes were cast for and against the measure as follows:

M – Housing for People Vote Count Percent
No 10,977 60.59%
Yes 7,139 39.41%
A majority of the votes cast were against this ballot measure, therefore the measure (Measure M) failed.

5. Votes were cast for the candidates for the office of District 1 Councilmember as follows:

Name of Candidate Vote Count Percent
David Tannaci 1,663 47.03%
Gabriela Trigueiro 1,846 52.21%
Based on the official count by the County Elections Official, Gabriela Trigueiro was elected as District 1 Councilmember.

6. Votes were cast for the candidates for the office of District 2 Councilmember as follows:

Name of Candidate Vote Count Percent
Sonja Brunner 1,872 57.87%
Hector Marin 1,318 40.74%
Based on the official count by the County Elections Official, Sonja Brunner was elected as District 4 Councilmember.

7. Votes were cast for the candidates for the office of District 3 Councilmember as follows:

Name of Candidate Vote Count Percent
Shebreh-Kalantari-Johnson 2,270 69.00%
Joy Schendledecker 995 30.24%
Based on the official count by the County Elections Official, Renee Golder was elected as District 6 Councilmember.

8. Votes were cast for the candidates for the office of District 5 Councilmember as follows:

Name of Candidate Vote Count Percent
Susie O’Hara 859 57.81%
Joe Thompson 616 41.45%

11.4 RESOLUTION NO. NSBased on the official count by the County Elections Official, Susie O’Hara was elected as District 5 Councilmember.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of April, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: _________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: _______________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

11.5 Statement of Vote
March 5, 2024 Presidential Primary Election
Tricia Webber, Santa Cruz County Clerk
701 Ocean St., Room 310
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
831-454-2060 / 1-866-282-5900
831-454-2445 (FAX)
www.votescount.santacruzcountyca.gov

11.6 Certification of County Clerk of the Results of the Canvass of the March 5, 2024, Presidential Primary Election
I, Tricia Webber, County Clerk of the County of Santa Cruz, do hereby certify that, in pursuance to the provisions of Elections Code Section 15300, et. seq., I did canvass the results for the votes cast in the Presidential Primary Election held in Santa Cruz County on March 5, 2024, for measures and contests that were submitted to the vote of the voters, and that the Statement of Votes Cast to which this certificate is attached, is true and correct.

I hereby set my hand and official seal this 2nd day of March 2024 at the County of Santa Cruz.
_______________________
Tricia Webber
Santa Cruz County Clerk

11.7 1 City of Santa Cruz Councilmember -
District 1
1 1 1
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
David
Tannaci
Trigueiro
Gabriela
Write In
11100 In Person 2580 86 3.33 % 46 31
11100 Vote by Mail 2580 1432 55.50 % 508 697 8
11100 Total 2580 1518 58.84 % 554 728 8
31100 In Person 1911 82 4.29 % 39 33 1
31100 Vote by Mail 1911 945 49.45 % 413 438 5
31100 Total 1911 1027 53.74 % 452 471 6
31130 In Person 146 5 3.42 % 1 4
31130 Vote by Mail 146 69 47.26 % 28 32 1
31130 Total 146 74 50.68 % 29 36 1
51100 In Person 2942 100 3.40 % 44 38 3
51100 Vote by Mail 2942 1319 44.83 % 584 573 9
51100 Total 2942 1419 48.23 % 628 611 12
Electionwide In Person 7579 273 3.60 % 130 106 4
Electionwide Vote by Mail 7579 3765 49.68 % 1533 1740 23 Electionwide Total 7579 4038 53.28 % 1663 1846 27
Total - In Person 7579 273 3.60 % 130 106 4
Total - Vote by Mail 7579 3765 49.68 % 1533 1740 23
Contest Total 7579 4038 53.28 % 1663 1846 27
Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:28 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:28 PM Page 153 of 177 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District Canvass
March 5, 2024

11.8 1 City of Santa Cruz Councilmember -
District 1
1 1 1
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
David
Tannaci
Trigueiro
Gabriela
Write In
Electionwide Total 7579 273 3.60 % 130 106 4
19th Congressional District Total 7579 273 3.60 % 130 106 4 17th Senatorial District Total 7579 273 3.60 % 130 106 4 28th Assemby District Total 7579 273 3.60 % 130 106 4
State Board of Equalization -
District 2
Total 7579 273 3.60 % 130 106 4
1st Supervisorial District Total 2580 86 3.33 % 46 31
3rd Supervisorial District Total 2057 87 4.23 % 40 37 1 5th Supervisorial District Total 2942 100 3.40 % 44 38 3 City of Santa Cruz Total 7579 273 3.60 % 130 106 4
City of Santa Cruz-District 1 Total 7579 273 3.60 % 130 106 4 Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Page 33 of 43 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District In Person Results
Election Date: March 5, 2024

11.9 1 City of Santa Cruz Councilmember -
District 1
1 1 1
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
David
Tannaci
Trigueiro
Gabriela
Write In
Electionwide Total 7579 3765 49.68 % 1533 1740 23
19th Congressional District Total 7579 3765 49.68 % 1533 1740 23 17th Senatorial District Total 7579 3765 49.68 % 1533 1740 23 28th Assemby District Total 7579 3765 49.68 % 1533 1740 23 State Board of Equalization -
District 2
Total 7579 3765 49.68 % 1533 1740 23
1st Supervisorial District Total 2580 1432 55.50 % 508 697 8 3rd Supervisorial District Total 2057 1014 49.30 % 441 470 6 5th Supervisorial District Total 2942 1319 44.83 % 584 573 9 City of Santa Cruz Total 7579 3765 49.68 % 1533 1740 23 City of Santa Cruz-District 1 Total 7579 3765 49.68 % 1533 1740 23 Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Page 33 of 43 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District Vote By Mail Results
Election Date: March 5, 2024

11.10 1 City of Santa Cruz Councilmember -
District 2
1 1 1
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Sonja
Brunner
Hector Marin
Write In
31200 In Person 3128 113 3.61 % 50 45 3
31200 Vote by Mail 3128 1581 50.54 % 886 546 21
31200 Total 3128 1694 54.16 % 936 591 24
31201 In Person 3679 144 3.91 % 58 71 1
31201 Vote by Mail 3679 1579 42.92 % 807 600 20
31201 Total 3679 1723 46.83 % 865 671 21
51200 In Person 303 13 4.29 % 5 6
51200 Vote by Mail 303 126 41.58 % 66 50
51200 Total 303 139 45.87 % 71 56
Electionwide In Person 7110 270 3.80 % 113 122 4
Electionwide Vote by Mail 7110 3286 46.22 % 1759 1196 41 Electionwide Total 7110 3556 50.01 % 1872 1318 45
Total - In Person 7110 270 3.80 % 113 122 4
Total - Vote by Mail 7110 3286 46.22 % 1759 1196 41
Contest Total 7110 3556 50.01 % 1872 1318 45
Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:28 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:28 PM Page 154 of 177 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District Canvass
March 5, 2024

11.11 1 City of Santa Cruz Councilmember -
District 2
1 1 1
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Sonja
Brunner
Hector Marin
Write In
Electionwide Total 7110 270 3.80 % 113 122 4
19th Congressional District Total 7110 270 3.80 % 113 122 4 17th Senatorial District Total 7110 270 3.80 % 113 122 4 28th Assemby District Total 7110 270 3.80 % 113 122 4
State Board of Equalization -
District 2
Total 7110 270 3.80 % 113 122 4
3rd Supervisorial District Total 6807 257 3.78 % 108 116 4 5th Supervisorial District Total 303 13 4.29 % 5 6
City of Santa Cruz Total 7110 270 3.80 % 113 122 4
City of Santa Cruz-District 2 Total 7110 270 3.80 % 113 122 4 Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Page 34 of 43 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District In Person Results
Election Date: March 5, 2024

11.12 1 City of Santa Cruz Councilmember -
District 2
1 1 1
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Sonja
Brunner
Hector Marin
Write In
Electionwide Total 7110 3286 46.22 % 1759 1196 41
19th Congressional District Total 7110 3286 46.22 % 1759 1196 41 17th Senatorial District Total 7110 3286 46.22 % 1759 1196 41 28th Assemby District Total 7110 3286 46.22 % 1759 1196 41 State Board of Equalization -
District 2
Total 7110 3286 46.22 % 1759 1196 41
3rd Supervisorial District Total 6807 3160 46.42 % 1693 1146 41 5th Supervisorial District Total 303 126 41.58 % 66 50
City of Santa Cruz Total 7110 3286 46.22 % 1759 1196 41 City of Santa Cruz-District 2 Total 7110 3286 46.22 % 1759 1196 41 Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Page 34 of 43 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District Vote By Mail Results
Election Date: March 5, 2024

11.13 1 City of Santa Cruz Councilmember -
District 3
1 1 1
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Joy
Schendledecker
KalantariShebreh
Johnson
Write In
31300 In Person 3706 145 3.91 % 64 60 4
31300 Vote by Mail 3706 1785 48.17 % 500 1112 10
31300 Total 3706 1930 52.08 % 564 1172 14
31301 In Person 3161 122 3.86 % 57 50 1
31301 Vote by Mail 3161 1543 48.81 % 374 1048 10
31301 Total 3161 1665 52.67 % 431 1098 11
Electionwide In Person 6867 267 3.89 % 121 110 5
Electionwide Vote by Mail 6867 3328 48.46 % 874 2160 20 Electionwide Total 6867 3595 52.35 % 995 2270 25
Total - In Person 6867 267 3.89 % 121 110 5
Total - Vote by Mail 6867 3328 48.46 % 874 2160 20
Contest Total 6867 3595 52.35 % 995 2270 25
Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:28 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:28 PM Page 155 of 177 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District Canvass
March 5, 2024

11.14 1 City of Santa Cruz Councilmember -
District 3
1 1 1
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Joy
Schendledecker
KalantariShebreh
Johnson
Write In
Electionwide Total 6867 267 3.89 % 121 110 5
19th Congressional District Total 6867 267 3.89 % 121 110 5 17th Senatorial District Total 6867 267 3.89 % 121 110 5 28th Assemby District Total 6867 267 3.89 % 121 110 5
State Board of Equalization -
District 2
Total 6867 267 3.89 % 121 110 5
3rd Supervisorial District Total 6867 267 3.89 % 121 110 5 City of Santa Cruz Total 6867 267 3.89 % 121 110 5
City of Santa Cruz-District 3 Total 6867 267 3.89 % 121 110 5 Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Page 35 of 43 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District In Person Results
Election Date: March 5, 2024

11.15 1 City of Santa Cruz Councilmember -
District 3
1 1 1
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Joy
Schendledecker
KalantariShebreh
Johnson
Write In
Electionwide Total 6867 3328 48.46 % 874 2160 20
19th Congressional District Total 6867 3328 48.46 % 874 2160 20 17th Senatorial District Total 6867 3328 48.46 % 874 2160 20 28th Assemby District Total 6867 3328 48.46 % 874 2160 20 State Board of Equalization -
District 2
Total 6867 3328 48.46 % 874 2160 20
3rd Supervisorial District Total 6867 3328 48.46 % 874 2160 20 City of Santa Cruz Total 6867 3328 48.46 % 874 2160 20
City of Santa Cruz-District 3 Total 6867 3328 48.46 % 874 2160 20 Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Page 35 of 43 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District Vote By Mail Results
Election Date: March 5, 2024

11.16 1 City of Santa Cruz Councilmember -
District 5
1 1 1
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Joe
Thompson
O'Hara
Susie
Write In
31500 In Person 1250 210 16.80 % 160 29
31500 Vote by Mail 1250 488 39.04 % 92 366 4
31500 Total 1250 698 55.84 % 252 395 4
31501 In Person 22 0 0.00 %
31501 Vote by Mail 22 8 36.36 % 7
31501 Total 22 8 36.36 % 7
31550 In Person 253 80 31.62 % 58 16 1
31550 Vote by Mail 253 29 11.46 % 20 7
31550 Total 253 109 43.08 % 78 23 1
51500 In Person 1875 77 4.11 % 35 29 1
51500 Vote by Mail 1875 714 38.08 % 251 405 5
51500 Total 1875 791 42.19 % 286 434 6
Electionwide In Person 3400 367 10.79 % 253 74 2
Electionwide Vote by Mail 3400 1239 36.44 % 363 785 9
Electionwide Total 3400 1606 47.24 % 616 859 11
Total - In Person 3400 367 10.79 % 253 74 2
Total - Vote by Mail 3400 1239 36.44 % 363 785 9
Contest Total 3400 1606 47.24 % 616 859 11
Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:28 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:28 PM Page 156 of 177 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District Canvass
March 5, 2024

11.17 1 City of Santa Cruz Councilmember -
District 5
1 1 1
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Joe
Thompson
O'Hara
Susie
Write In
Electionwide Total 3400 367 10.79 % 253 74 2
19th Congressional District Total 3400 367 10.79 % 253 74 2 17th Senatorial District Total 3400 367 10.79 % 253 74 2 28th Assemby District Total 3400 367 10.79 % 253 74 2
State Board of Equalization -
District 2
Total 3400 367 10.79 % 253 74 2
3rd Supervisorial District Total 1525 290 19.02 % 218 45 1 5th Supervisorial District Total 1875 77 4.11 % 35 29 1 City of Santa Cruz Total 3400 367 10.79 % 253 74 2
City of Santa Cruz-District 5 Total 3400 367 10.79 % 253 74 2 Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Page 36 of 43 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District In Person Results
Election Date: March 5, 2024

11.18 1 City of Santa Cruz Councilmember -
District 5
1 1 1
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Joe
Thompson
O'Hara
Susie
Write In
Electionwide Total 3400 1239 36.44 % 363 785 9
19th Congressional District Total 3400 1239 36.44 % 363 785 9 17th Senatorial District Total 3400 1239 36.44 % 363 785 9 28th Assemby District Total 3400 1239 36.44 % 363 785 9 State Board of Equalization -
District 2
Total 3400 1239 36.44 % 363 785 9
3rd Supervisorial District Total 1525 525 34.43 % 112 380 4 5th Supervisorial District Total 1875 714 38.08 % 251 405 5 City of Santa Cruz Total 3400 1239 36.44 % 363 785 9
City of Santa Cruz-District 5 Total 3400 1239 36.44 % 363 785 9 Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Page 36 of 43 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District Vote By Mail Results
Election Date: March 5, 2024

11.19 1 L - City of Santa Cruz Sales And Use Tax - Majority To Pass 2 M - City of Santa Cruz Housing For
People - Majority To Pass
1 1 2 2
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Yes
No
Yes
No
11100 In Person 2580 86 3.33 % 45 40 39 46
11100 Vote by Mail 2580 1432 55.50 % 722 671 451 936
11100 Total 2580 1518 58.84 % 767 711 490 982
31100 In Person 1911 82 4.29 % 35 43 39 40
31100 Vote by Mail 1911 945 49.45 % 540 367 421 493
31100 Total 1911 1027 53.74 % 575 410 460 533
31130 In Person 146 5 3.42 % 3 1 2 2
31130 Vote by Mail 146 69 47.26 % 48 18 27 39
31130 Total 146 74 50.68 % 51 19 29 41
31200 In Person 3128 113 3.61 % 64 49 56 56
31200 Vote by Mail 3128 1581 50.54 % 949 579 602 917
31200 Total 3128 1694 54.16 % 1013 628 658 973
31201 In Person 3679 144 3.91 % 82 55 65 74
31201 Vote by Mail 3679 1579 42.92 % 964 548 612 879
31201 Total 3679 1723 46.83 % 1046 603 677 953
31300 In Person 3706 145 3.91 % 89 52 56 87
31300 Vote by Mail 3706 1785 48.17 % 1054 687 714 1013
31300 Total 3706 1930 52.08 % 1143 739 770 1100
31301 In Person 3161 122 3.86 % 78 40 47 68
31301 Vote by Mail 3161 1543 48.81 % 917 571 547 954
31301 Total 3161 1665 52.67 % 995 611 594 1022
31400 In Person 2947 107 3.63 % 66 37 39 65
31400 Vote by Mail 2947 1582 53.68 % 954 589 593 908
31400 Total 2947 1689 57.31 % 1020 626 632 973
31402 In Person 3086 141 4.57 % 92 46 70 68
31402 Vote by Mail 3086 1066 34.54 % 686 342 451 556
31402 Total 3086 1207 39.11 % 778 388 521 624
31500 In Person 1250 210 16.80 % 161 31 76 121
31500 Vote by Mail 1250 488 39.04 % 271 201 136 329
31500 Total 1250 698 55.84 % 432 232 212 450
31501 In Person 22 0 0.00 %
31501 Vote by Mail 22 8 36.36 % 4 4 4 4
31501 Total 22 8 36.36 % 4 4 4 4
31550 In Person 253 80 31.62 % 53 23 22 53
31550 Vote by Mail 253 29 11.46 % 16 9 8 18
31550 Total 253 109 43.08 % 69 32 30 71
31600 In Person 1626 116 7.13 % 85 26 39 70
31600 Vote by Mail 1626 609 37.45 % 354 241 190 385
31600 Total 1626 725 44.59 % 439 267 229 455
31601 In Person 1452 54 3.72 % 33 19 24 26
31601 Vote by Mail 1452 617 42.49 % 374 223 237 345
31601 Total 1452 671 46.21 % 407 242 261 371
31612 In Person 3177 110 3.46 % 59 48 45 61
31612 Vote by Mail 3177 1692 53.26 % 983 670 589 1036
31612 Total 3177 1802 56.72 % 1042 718 634 1097
51100 In Person 2942 100 3.40 % 60 37 40 56
51100 Vote by Mail 2942 1319 44.83 % 798 472 536 732
51100 Total 2942 1419 48.23 % 858 509 576 788
51200 In Person 303 13 4.29 % 9 4 5 8
Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:28 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:28 PM Page 174 of 177 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District Canvass
March 5, 2024

11.20 1 L - City of Santa Cruz Sales And Use Tax - Majority To Pass 2 M - City of Santa Cruz Housing For
People - Majority To Pass
1 1 2 2
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Yes
No
Yes
No
51200 Vote by Mail 303 126 41.58 % 88 34 54 67
51200 Total 303 139 45.87 % 97 38 59 75
51440 In Person 30 1 3.33 % 1 1
51440 Vote by Mail 30 11 36.67 % 6 5 6 5
51440 Total 30 12 40.00 % 7 5 6 6
51500 In Person 1875 77 4.11 % 59 13 32 40
51500 Vote by Mail 1875 714 38.08 % 500 198 265 419
51500 Total 1875 791 42.19 % 559 211 297 459
Electionwide In Person 37274 1706 4.58 % 1074 564 696 942 Electionwide Vote by Mail 37274 17195 46.13 % 10228 6429 6443 10035 Electionwide Total 37274 18901 50.71 % 11302 6993 7139 10977 Total - In Person 37274 1706 4.58 % 1074 564 696 942
Total - Vote by Mail 37274 17195 46.13 % 10228 6429 6443 10035 Contest Total 37274 18901 50.71 % 11302 6993 7139 10977 Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:28 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:28 PM Page 175 of 177 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District Canvass
March 5, 2024

11.21 1 L - City of Santa Cruz Sales And Use Tax - Majority To Pass 2 M - City of Santa Cruz Housing For
People - Majority To Pass
1 1 2 2
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Yes
No
Yes
No
Electionwide Total 37274 1706 4.58 % 1074 564 696 942
19th Congressional District Total 37274 1706 4.58 % 1074 564 696 942 17th Senatorial District Total 37274 1706 4.58 % 1074 564 696 942 28th Assemby District Total 37274 1706 4.58 % 1074 564 696 942 State Board of Equalization -
District 2
Total 37274 1706 4.58 % 1074 564 696 942
1st Supervisorial District Total 2580 86 3.33 % 45 40 39 46 3rd Supervisorial District Total 29544 1429 4.84 % 900 470 580 791 5th Supervisorial District Total 5150 191 3.71 % 129 54 77 105 City of Santa Cruz Total 37274 1706 4.58 % 1074 564 696 942 City of Santa Cruz-District 1 Total 7579 273 3.60 % 143 121 120 144 City of Santa Cruz-District 2 Total 7110 270 3.80 % 155 108 126 138 City of Santa Cruz-District 3 Total 6867 267 3.89 % 167 92 103 155 City of Santa Cruz-District 4 Total 6063 249 4.11 % 159 83 109 134 City of Santa Cruz-District 5 Total 3400 367 10.79 % 273 67 130 214 City of Santa Cruz-District 6 Total 6255 280 4.48 % 177 93 108 157 Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Page 42 of 43 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District In Person Results
Election Date: March 5, 2024

11.22 1 L - City of Santa Cruz Sales And Use Tax - Majority To Pass 2 M - City of Santa Cruz Housing For
People - Majority To Pass
1 1 2 2
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Yes
No
Yes
No
Electionwide Total 37274 17195 46.13 % 10228 6429 6443 10035 19th Congressional District Total 37274 17195 46.13 % 10228 6429 6443 10035 17th Senatorial District Total 37274 17195 46.13 % 10228 6429 6443 10035 28th Assemby District Total 37274 17195 46.13 % 10228 6429 6443 10035 State Board of Equalization -
District 2
Total 37274 17195 46.13 % 10228 6429 6443 10035
1st Supervisorial District Total 2580 1432 55.50 % 722 671 451 936 3rd Supervisorial District Total 29544 13593 46.01 % 8114 5049 5131 7876 5th Supervisorial District Total 5150 2170 42.14 % 1392 709 861 1223 City of Santa Cruz Total 37274 17195 46.13 % 10228 6429 6443 10035 City of Santa Cruz-District 1 Total 7579 3765 49.68 % 2108 1528 1435 2200 City of Santa Cruz-District 2 Total 7110 3286 46.22 % 2001 1161 1268 1863 City of Santa Cruz-District 3 Total 6867 3328 48.46 % 1971 1258 1261 1967 City of Santa Cruz-District 4 Total 6063 2659 43.86 % 1646 936 1050 1469 City of Santa Cruz-District 5 Total 3400 1239 36.44 % 791 412 413 770 City of Santa Cruz-District 6 Total 6255 2918 46.65 % 1711 1134 1016 1766 Printed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Data Refreshed: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:40 PM Page 42 of 43 County of Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 2024 Presidential Primary
District Vote By Mail Results
Election Date: March 5, 2024

11.23 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 03/21/2024
AGENDA OF: 04/09/2024
DEPARTMENT: Economic Development and Housing/Finance/Public Works SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Staff to Work with City's Municipal Advisor to Secure Financing of $20M for Construction of the Parking Garage Component of the Downtown Library Affordable Housing Project (DLAHP) and Direct Staff to Assist the Affordable Housing Developer Partner with its California Tax Credit Allocation Request Application (EDH/FN/PW)
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Adopt a resolution authorizing staff to work with the City’s Municipal Advisor to secure financing for the estimated total capital need of $20M, and 2) Direct staff to assist the affordable housing developer partner with its California Tax Credit Allocation Committee for their request for the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program by providing letters of funding commitments as needed including the parking garage component.

BACKGROUND: The Downtown Library Affordable Housing Project (DLAHP) continues to make progress on construction ready documents following the approval of project entitlements by the City Council on March 14th, 2023. Congruently with the design efforts the project team has been working to secure the necessary funding sources associated with construction costs.

To date the team has secured funds from the HCD Local Housing Trust Fund (LHTF), Santa Cruz Affordable Housing Trust Fund (AHTF), Santa Cruz Economic Development Trust Fund, a Congressional Grant, an Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities Award, a Central Coast Community Energy Grant, a REAP Grant through the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments; with these funds totaling over $31.5M. Additionally, the project will be utilizing the $25M Measure S funds available for Library Construction.

At this time, there are two funding sources that are necessary to secure: the capital for the parking garage component being funded by the Downtown Parking District supported by the Public Works Department, and our Affordable Housing Developer Partners' application to the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC). This application for the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program to TCAC is due at the end of April 2024. Securing these two funding sources will allow for our construction to begin as anticipated in early 2025, following approval of building permits.

12.1 DISCUSSION: The project team will be making a submission/application for the required building permits in May of 2024 with anticipated approval by the end of the calendar year.

Preconstruction has continued to progress through 2024 and is anticipated to conclude in the first quarter of 2025, at which time construction will commence. The parking garage component is a critical aspect of the overall project, with these new parking stalls replacing an existing surface parking lot, the overall supply of vehicular parking stalls within the Downtown Parking District will decline due to existing, pending, and foreseeable future development.

The project team and City Council anticipated the need to issue Parking Revenue Bonds to provide the working capital necessary to construct the parking garage component of the Downtown Library Affordable Housing Project. In July of 2023, the new parking rates were implemented as part of the Council approved 5-year parking rate strategy. This strategy in part was established to help support the debt service associated with this capital project. The approximately 235 parking space garage is estimated to require a $20 million dollar Revenue Bond to cover the costs of construction which equals approximately $85,000 per parking space.

To date the Parking District has provided the necessary funds to cover preconstruction costs and bonding is only needed for the required capital for construction.

FISCAL IMPACT: Annual debt service payments are expected to start in FY 2025 and are estimated to be between $1.2M and 1.4M depending on rate and assumptions at the time issuance. This will be paid for by the Parking District Enterprise Fund. There is no impact to General Fund.

Prepared By:

Brian W. Borguno
Development Manager
Submitted By:

Elizabeth Cabell
Finance Director
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. RESOLUTION TO SECURE FINANCING FOR PARKING GARAGE FOR DLAHP.DOCX

12.2 RESOLUTION NO. NS-XX,XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SECURE FINANCING OF $20M FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PARKING

GARAGE COMPONENT OF THE DOWNTOWN LIBRARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING

PROJECT (DLAHP)
WHEREAS, the Downtown Library Affordable Housing Project (DLAHP) continues to make progress on construction ready documents following the approval of project entitlements by the City Council on March 14th, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the parking garage component is a critical aspect of the overall project; and WHEREAS, the Parking District has provided the necessary funds to cover preconstruction costs; financing of $20 million is only needed for the required construction capital of the approximately 235 parking space garage.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz as follows:
1) Adopt a resolution authorizing staff to work with the City’s Municipal Advisor to secure financing for the estimated total capital need of $20M for the new construction of a parking garage as part of the DLAHP.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of April, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: ______________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

12.3 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Rick Longinotti <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 9:47 AM
To: City Council
Cc: [email protected]; Sierra Club Transportation Committee Subject: clarification needed Item 12
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
Could you please clarify in your motion on the proposed resolution in Item 12, that City staff will return to the Council to seek approval of any bond for the parking garage? In other words, please clarify that the proposed resolution is not an authorization to commit the City to bonded indebtedness.

The reason for this clarification is to ensure that prior to approval of the bond, the Council has the information needed to understand the Parking District’s ability to make payments on the bond. Since the start of the pandemic four years ago, the Parking District’s income has not met its expenses. The Parking District’s reserves were exhausted in the second year of the pandemic. Since there is no track record of a surplus to pay bond debt, bond rating agencies such as Moody’s or Standard & Poors would give a very low rating to the City’s proposed bond. Such a low rating would require an excessively high rate of interest.

I trust that the Council will want to understand the terms of the bond before committing the City to 30 years of debt.

Thank you,
Rick
Rick Longinotti, Chair
Campaign for Sustainable Transportation

12.4 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Matt Farrell <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 9:53 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Support funding actions for Downtown Library Affordable Housing Project Mayor Keeley and City Councilmembers,
I am writing to encourage you to support the staff recommendation regarding the Downtown Library Affordable Housing project:

1. Adopt a resolution allowing the City Finance Director to work with the Municipal Advisor to secure Parking Revenue Bonds for the project supported by the Downtown Parking District, and

2. Provide funding commitment letters in support of the Developers’ application for state TCSC Affordable Housing tax credits for the affordable housing component.

This is a critical step forward in providing critically needed affordable housing in Downtown and creating shared parking which will replace shared parking lost as a result of this project and other infill projects approved in the Downtown. The funding commitment letters will help move forward an affordable housing project which is critical to Downtown and to meeting our city's affordable housing goals.

The voters clearly demonstrated their support for this project with the defeat of Measure M. There is no question about public opinion on this question.

Staff has worked diligently and creatively to pursue funding and improve the project's design. Please support them in continuing this work.

This much needed project addresses our community's need for affordable housing, a new 21st century library and shared car and bicycle parking for downtown visitors, customers, residents and workers.

Matt Farrell
922 Windsor St, Santa Cruz, CA 95062
831 331-7496

12.5 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: cindy jackson <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 12:24 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support funding actions for DLAH Project
Dear Members of the SC City Council:

As an individual who supported Measure S, all the private efforts to improve the other 9 city/county library projects, I urge you to now vote to continue the progress on the Downtown Library Affordable Housing Project by:

1. Allowing the City Finance Director to secure parking revenue bonds for the project supported by the Downtown Parking District
AND

2. Provide commitment letters to support the Developers' applications for state TCSC Affordable Housing tax credits.

These steps are critical for construction to begin in early 2025, following approval of the building permits.

Thank you for your support of this project.

Cindy Jackson
Friends of the SC Public Libraries
831-535-2548

12.6 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Judi Grunstra <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 12:49 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Consent Agenda Item 12
Dear Mayor and Council:

Every time I go downtown I specifically take note of the number of available parking spaces in several downtown garages. There are usually hundreds of empty spots, including times when there are events happening downtown. Surely this indicates that Parking District revenue is under-performing. Even after the feared loss of spaces at the Calvary Church parking lot, there is plentiful parking throughout downtown.

When the garage capacity was decreased from 400 to 200 (approximately), the cost estimate was $10 million. (I cannot find the exact document but I know I saw it a few years ago.) With inflation, it is now $20. (perhaps more, eventually)
The Downtown Library Advisory Commission in 2017 chose the option of relocating the library to a mixed-use project because they were led to believe that with the Measure S funds available ($23-27 million), the library would, in the words of Martin Bernal, get "more bang for the buck." Since the last estimate for the library was around $41 million, with no current news from the city as to how the funding gap for the library will be addressed, the final costs of this project remain up in the air.

Please do not commit our city to bond indebtedness to pay for a 5th downtown garage, when we have sufficient and even excess parking supply, and that could continue. Don't ask tax-payers to subsidize parking for future housing projects whose developers don't provide it, whether market-rate or "affordable" (i.e. subsidized).

And in the public correspondence from Matt Farrell, he states that the defeat of Measure M reflects the public's support for the garage/housing/library project. Measure M had nothing to do with this. Perhaps he meant Measure O of a few years ago.

Thank you.

Judi Grunstra

12.7 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Cynthia Mathews <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 11:09 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Support for DT Library/Housing project funding Dear Councilmembers
I’m writing as both a longtime library supporter and member of the city’s Downtown Commission to express my enthusiastic support for Item #12 on your upcoming agenda, recommending Council action in support of two important funding sources for components of the Library Affordable Housing project: the parking garage and affordable housing. This represents another key commitment on the part of the city to advance this longsought mixed-use project, by bringing together the funding available to individual components. While not included in this agenda action, the Library component is of course actively pursuing its own funding through various sources.

This project is an excellent example of the growing national trend for mixed use projects that meet current and future needs in a way that is both cost-effective and socially beneficial: investment in the interwoven goals of increased affordable housing, strong civic institutions and a healthy downtown city center.

Although the action before you on Item 12 may seem largely administrative, it is in fact a strong indication of how much good work is being done to sustain the momentum on the mixed use project. We are delighted to see the council’s affirmation of these next steps, and look forward to future reports.

Sincerely,
Cynthia Mathews

12.8 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Deborah Tracy-Proulx <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 2:44 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support funding actions for Downtown Library Affordable Housing Project Dear Councilmembers -
I am writing to you in support of adopting the resolution to allow the City Finance Director to work with the Municipal Advisor to secure Parking Revenue Bonds for the project supported by the Downtown Parking District, and in support of the Affordable Housing Developer Partners' application to the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) for participation in the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program. By taking these actions, the City can secure the funding needed to keep the DLAHP progress and momentum going.

Thank you for making this investment in our community,
Deb
--
Deb Tracy-Proulx
831.251.0943 mobile

12.9 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 03/21/2024
AGENDA OF: 04/09/2024
DEPARTMENT: Finance
SUBJECT: Liability Claims Filed Against the City of Santa Cruz (FN) RECOMMENDATION: Motion to reject the liability claims of 1) Sally Ann Laine and 2) Mark S. Anderson, based on staff recommendation.

BACKGROUND: N/A
DISCUSSION: I. Claims to be rejected:

1. Claimant: Sally Ann Laine
Date of occurrence: 02/07/2024
Date of claim: 03/06/2024
Amount of claim: $ 2,298.05
Claimant seeks reimbursement for alleged damages to her vehicle.

Self-Represented

2. Claimant: Mark S. Anderson
Date of occurrence: 01/12/2024
Date of claim: 03/08/2024
Amount of claim: $ 3,188.50
Claimant is seeking reimbursement for plumbing repairs allegedly caused by an improperly installed water meter.

Self-Represented
FISCAL IMPACT: None.

Prepared By:

Ross Brandon
Risk & Safety Manager
Submitted By:

Elizabeth Cabell
Finance Director
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

None.

13.1 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 03/20/2024
AGENDA OF: 04/09/2024
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Naming of San Lorenzo Park Lawn Bowling Green (PR) RECOMMENDATION: Motion to officially name the lawn bowling green in San Lorenzo Park the “Harry Schoenfeld Bowling Green.”
BACKGROUND: In September 2023, the Santa Cruz Lawn Bowls Club submitted a written request (Letter to Santa Cruz Parks & Recreation from Santa Cruz Bowls Club) to the Director of Parks & Recreation to name the San Lorenzo Park lawn bowling green in honor of long-standing club member Harry Schoenfeld.

The City of Santa Cruz’s City Council Policy 24.1 (City Council Policy 24.1), otherwise known by its policy title “Naming of City Parks, Facilities, and Facility Amenities” establishes criteria and procedures for the Parks & Recreation Department, the Parks & Recreation Commission, and the City Council to consider naming rights for various City park facilities and assets. In accordance with City Council Policy 24.1, the members of the lawn bowling community began by writing to the Director with a formal request for consideration. The second step for consideration of naming rights was to present the item to the Parks & Recreation Commission for a recommendation. The Parks & Recreation Commission voted unanimously at its meeting on February 12, 2024 to favorably recommend the proposal to City Council for final consideration and approval.

City Council Policy 24.1 includes the following language relevant to this specific request:

This policy intends to address the following naming situations:

3. Honoring individuals or organizations in recognition of their significant contributions to the community.

The criteria for naming rights will include the following:

1. The person or organization has a longstanding affiliation with the City

2. The name provides a sense of place, reflecting the geographic location, community, neighborhood or street where the park, facility or amenity is located

3. The name recognizes the historical significance of the area or reflects unique characteristics of the site

14.1 b. Contributing to the historical or cultural preservation of the City c. Contributing toward the acquisition, development or conveyance of land or building
d. Making exemplary or meritorious contributions to the City

5. If named in memorial, the individual must be deceased at least one (1) year, have been a resident of Santa Cruz, and/or have made a significant contribution to the community in terms of improvement of quality of life.

DISCUSSION: Harry Schoenfeld has been a member of the Santa Cruz Lawn Bowling Club for 24 years and was a key leader in partnership with the Parks & Recreation Department in the development of the first artificial turf lawn bowling green in Northern California at San Lorenzo Park. Harry led fundraising efforts, was instrumental in the construction process, and collaborated with key partners to ensure the facility would become successful for the community for years to come. Harry served as club president from 2006-07 and has continued to be an ambassador to the sport of lawn bowling in Santa Cruz and Northern California. Harry is 101 years old and, while he has already made a tremendous impact, his work continues as a member and leader within the club and as a welcoming ambassador to San Lorenzo Park.

As the request letter from the Lawn Bowling Club states, “If you translate Schoenfeld from German, you get ‘beautiful field’ – a perfect description of our bowling green!” Parks & Recreation Department staff acknowledge and greatly appreciate Harry’s commitment and impact to recreation, parks, and the community of Santa Cruz.

It is the perspective of staff that this request specifically meets the following criteria outlined in City Council Policy 24.1:

1. The person or organization has a longstanding affiliation with the City

4. The names of persons, organizations, corporations, foundations or families will be considered when they have made a significant contribution to the City by:
a. Enhancing the quality of life and well-being of the City c. Contributing toward the acquisition, development or conveyance of land or building
d. Making exemplary or meritorious contributions to the City Staff recommend approval of naming the lawn bowling green in a manner consistent with the request made by the Lawn Bowling Club – the “Harry Schoenfeld Bowling Green”.

Although the San Lorenzo Park redesign process is still underway, community members and Parks & Recreation Commission have made it clear that keeping the San Lorenzo Park lawn bowling green is a key element of the park for the future. Therefore, staff believe naming the bowling green is appropriate for the immediate future and as long as the green remains part of San Lorenzo Park. If at a future time, the lawn bowling green is no longer active, has fallen into disrepair, and has been replaced by a new amenity, the naming rights term would end. If that point is reached in the future, Parks & Recreation staff recommend that the Parks & Recreation Commission and City Council consider a memorial plaque or marker to acknowledge the historic lawn bowling use and the “Harry Schoenfeld Bowling Green” name.

FISCAL IMPACT: None.

14.2 Prepared and Submitted By:

Tony Elliot
Director of Parks &
Recreation
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. SANTA CRUZ BOWLS LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2023.PDF

2. CITY COUNCIL POLICY 24.1.PDF

14.3 Santa Cruz Bowls Club
c/o 227 Chico Ave
Santa Cruz CA 95060
Tony Elliot, Director
Santa Cruz Parks and Recreation
323 Church St.

Santa Cruz, CA 95060
September 14, 2023
Dear Tony,
Santa Cruz Bowls Club would like to request that the bowling green located in San Lorenzo Park be officially named the "Harry Schoenfeld Bowling Green". Harry has been a club member for 23 years joining in 2000 when the green was natural grass.

Since that day he has bowled regularly at least twice a week. The grass surface failed in 2004 and Harry led in holding the club together when there was no green on which to play. Working with Steve Hammack and Danette Shoemaker of Santa Cruz City Parks and Recreation Department, Harry was instrumental in fundraising and facilitating construction of the first artificial surface bowling green in Northern California. His vision was to create the San Lorenzo Park bowling green as a resource for the entire Santa Cruz community creating not only a place that would keep people active and socially connected, but would also promote Santa Cruz tourism through state, national and international tournaments and visitors. He worked with Granite Construction convincing them to donate labor and materials to create the subsurface and with the Australian firm of Berry Sport Surfaces who installed the carpet. As an avid woodworker, he made and installed the backboards surrounding the green to create superior playing conditions.

14.4 Harry served as club president 2006-2007. Since 2007, he has sponsored a scholarship for students covering their fees so that they could play the sport at no cost.

Harry continues to promote the sport which provides opportunity for young and old , men and women, and all abilities to compete while enjoying the beautiful San Lorenzo Park environment. He has donated generously of his time and money to improve the facility and associated equipment. He donated all materials and labor to build eight benches surrounding the green for use by club and community members. When the club house was remodeled in 2015, he provided materials and labor to manufacture and install all baseboard trim. He built and installed floor- to-ceiling storage shelving in 2016. He updated and installed the 5 ft wooden sign on the clubhouse exterior in 2019. He has regularly promoted the Santa Cruz green to other clubs throughout the bay area through competitive and social play and has promoted the sport to civic and social groups throughout Santa Cruz County.

In 2022, when the green was temporarily closed, Harry at age 99, tried surf fishing but fell and broke his hip. As soon as his doctor allowed, he returned to bowls and continues to play in spite of mobility limitations. With his motto of "Never Quit" he serves as an inspiration to others to enjoy life even after 101 trips around the sun. Quite incidentally, if you translate "schoenfeld" from German you get "beautiful field"- a perfect description of our bowling green! Thank you for your consideration.

Harry and his family have been contacted and they concur with the naming of the green.

Sincerely,
Christine Palochak, President
Santa Cruz Bowls Club

14.5 COUNCIL POLICY 24.1

POLICY TITLE NAMING OF CITY PARKS, FACILITIES AND FACILITY

AMENITIES
POLICY STATEMENT:

This policy intends to address the following naming situations:

1. The opening or reopening of parks, facilities, and facility amenities

2. Providing recognition of financial contributions

3. Honoring individuals or organizations in recognition of their significant contributions to the community.

The criteria for naming rights will include the following:

1. The person or organization has a longstanding affiliation with the City

2. The name provides a sense of place, reflecting the geographic location, community, neighborhood or street where the park, facility or amenity is located

3. The name recognizes the historical significance of the area or reflects unique characteristics of the site

4. The names of persons, organizations, corporations, foundations or families will be considered when they have made a significant contribution to the City by:
a. Enhancing the quality of life and well-being of the City b. Contributing to the historical or cultural preservation of the City c. Contributing toward the acquisition, development or conveyance of land or building
d. Making exemplary or meritorious contributions to the City

Names will not be chosen that:

1. Cause confusion due to duplication or names sounding similar to existing locations within the City of Santa Cruz

2. Are the name of companies whose business is substantially derived from the sale of alcohol, tobacco, firearms and/or pornography

3. Are discriminatory or derogatory considering race, gender, creed, religious or political affiliation, or other similar factors.

Where the name of an individual is recommended, consent shall be obtained from the individual or their next of kin prior to the City Council’s public consideration.

14.6 COUNCIL POLICY 24.1
Where the naming opportunity is the result of a financial contribution, the following factors must be considered:

1. The significance of the contribution made, relative to the construction and/or operating costs of the parks, facilities, and amenities within those facilities

2. The cost of establishing the naming option (costs to be determined by the responsible Department on an individual basis).

The duration of naming rights of parks, facilities, and amenities within those facilities shall be decided or negotiated on a case-by-case basis. Naming rights of parks, facilities, and amenities may be renewed by mutual agreement between the parties.

Existing names will not be changed without consideration of the historical significance of the existing name, the impact on the individual or organization previously named, the cost and impact of changing existing signs, rebuilding community recognition and updating records (i.e. letterhead, databases, and promotional materials).

Each application will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Applicant(s) shall submit a written request for naming rights to the corresponding Department Director, with justification to aid in considering the proposal. The proposed name shall be placed on the appropriate Commission agenda (if required), allowing appropriate time for review by the Commission, and to publicize and receive input from the public at the Commission meeting. The Commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for determination of the official name.

AUTHORIZATION: Council Policy Manual Update of November 17, 1998 Revised by motion May 23, 2006
M:\AGENDA\VIEW\POLICY\REVISED\24-01.DOC

14.7 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 03/21/2024
AGENDA OF: 04/09/2024
DEPARTMENT: Public Works/City Manager
SUBJECT: 733 River Street (former River Street Shelter Site) Demolition and Paving – Authorization of Work (PW/CM)
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve post-demolition paving work of the City-owned parcel at 733 River Street (former River Street Shelter) through a purchase order with Atlantis Paving in the amount of $121,906. The Public Works Director is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget.

BACKGROUND: The City of Santa Cruz (City) owns multiple parcels in the 100 block of Coral Street that are incorporated within the Housing Matters campus, including the site of the former River Street Shelter. The two buildings on the parcel were quite old and had fallen into further disrepair since they had not been utilized after Encompass Community Services ceased shelter operations on that property more than 3 years ago.

The City engaged in collaborative meetings with Housing Matters on how to best utilize this space on campus and considered options for both renovating the buildings and returning them to use as emergency shelter, and in demolishing the buildings to make space for new interim housing. The determination was made that it was not cost effective to renovate the existing structures, and that the more prudent approach was to demolish the structures to make way for additional non-congregate shelter or interim housing on the site. The Public Works Department awarded a contract for demolition in December 2023.

The demolition of the River Street Shelter building was completed in early January 2024. The next step in readying the property for future use for expanded non-congregate shelter or interim housing is to complete grading and paving of the parcel consistent with the surrounding campus.

DISCUSSION: On December 8, 2023, Public Works staff solicited informal bids for postdemolition paving of the approximately 10,200 sq. ft. parcel at 733 River St. The engineer’s estimate was $84,760. A Request for Quotes was sent to numerous local paving companies including Atlantis Paving, Santana Paving, Wenger Paving, Santa Cruz Underground & Paving, and Valley Paving. The only response by the December 22, 2023 deadline was Atlantis Paving, who’s initial bid was $167,049. After some correspondence with staff, the vendor was able to reduce this bid down to $121,905.52 and are holding this price for the City.

15.1 FISCAL IMPACT: Funds have been appropriated in FY 2024 for this work in City Manager’s Office Homelessness Response Division budget in the Navigation Center Phase II project (c102303). There is no impact to the General Fund.

Prepared By:

Larry Imwalle
Homelessness Response
Manager
Submitted By:

Nathan Nguyen, P.E.

Director of Public Works
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

None.

15.2 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 03/21/2024
AGENDA OF: 04/09/2024
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: Recycling Center Storm Water Treatment System Project - Request for Proposals and Authorization to Advertise and Award (PW) RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the plans and specifications, authorize staff to advertise and award a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Design, Build, and Maintenance Services for the Recycling Center Storm Water Treatment System Project (c402111). The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney, as authorized by Resolution No. NS-27,563. The Public Works Director is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget.

BACKGROUND: The Resource Recovery Facility (RRF) is regulated under the State Water Resources Control Board’s Industrial Storm Water General Permit (IGP). The RRF is divided into several drainage areas for compliance monitoring purposes, one of which is the Recycling Center. The IGP requires the implementation of storm water best management practices (BMPs) to reduce or prevent pollutants in storm water. In addition to various BMPs already implemented at the Recycling Center, the RRF has been renting a seasonal storm water treatment system in the past winters to capture and treat storm water coming from the Recycling Center as part of the RRF’s continuing effort to improve the site’s storm water quality.

DISCUSSION: The seasonal storm water treatment system is designed to convey captured storm water through a series of tanks to improve settlement. The storm water is treated further via sand filters before it is discharged back into the RRF’s storm drain system, where it flows into Lombardi Creek which flows to the Pacific Ocean. The rental period is usually for 6 months and costs around $130,000.

The seasonal system has been effective in reducing pollutants from the Recycling Center storm water. A more cost effective, long term solution, is to install a permanent treatment system that is modeled after the current rental system. The vendor’s scope will include completing design of a system similar to the current rental system, construction and installation of the new treatment system and provision of a one-year operating and maintenance agreement for as-needed service with an option to extend the contract annually.

Plans and specifications can be found online at:
https://www.cityofsantacruz.com/publicworksprojects
Schedule: The system must be operational in fall 2024.

16.1 Budget: The project is estimated to cost $390,000
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in in FY 2024 Refuse Fund Capital Investment Program (CIP) project Recycling Center Storm Water Treatment System (c402111). There is no impact to the General Fund.

Prepared By:

Hoi Yu
Associate Professional
Engineer
Submitted By:

Nathan Nguyen, P.E.

Director of Public Works
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Plans and specifications can be found online at:
https://www.cityofsantacruz.com/publicworksprojects

16.2 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 03/21/2024
AGENDA OF: 04/09/2024
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: Resource Recovery Facility Tank Pad Installation Project (c402111) – Authorization to Advertise and Award (PW)
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the plans and specifications for the Resource Recovery Facility Tank Pad Installation Project (c402111), authorize staff to advertise for bids, and award the contract. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney, and as authorized by Resolution No. NS27,563. The Director of Public Works is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget.

BACKGROUND: As part of the Resource Recovery Facility’s (RRF) continuing effort to meet the State Water Resources Control Board’s Industrial Storm Water General Permit (IGP) requirements and improve the site’s water quality, the RRF plans to install a permanent stormwater treatment system to treat runoff from the Recycling Center.

City staff has identified a location that would allow stormwater to gravity flow into the treatment system. The permanent Recycling Center Stormwater Treatment System will consist of three 20,000 gallon tanks to allow for settlement, an automated flocculant injection system to promote settling within the tanks, several pumps to convey stormwater through the system, and a sand filter to further remove stormwater pollutants before discharging into the RRF’s storm drain system, which flows into Lombardi Creek.

DISCUSSION: The Recycling Center Stormwater Treatment System will require a 25-ft by 135-ft pad for the placement of the treatment system components as described above. The location that was identified is slightly sloped, so it will require fill material to build a leveled asphalt pad. The construction of this pad will include a 12-ft wide access road and necessary erosion control.

Schedule: The project construction is estimated to start summer 2024.

Budget: The project is estimated to cost $100,000.

Plans and specifications can be found online at:
http://www.cityofsantacruz.com/publicworksprojects

17.1 FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in in FY 2024 Refuse Fund Capital Investment Program (CIP) project Resource Recovery Facility Tank Pad Installation (c402111). There is no impact to the General Fund.

Prepared By:

Hoi Yu
Associate Professional
Engineer
Submitted By:

Nathan Nguyen, P.E.

Director of Public Works
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Plans and specifications can be found online at:
http://www.cityofsantacruz.com/publicworksprojects

17.2 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 03/21/2024
AGENDA OF: 04/09/2024
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: Wastewater Treatment Facility Headworks Rehabilitation (c402204) – Authorization to Advertise and Award Contract (PW)
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the plans and specifications for the Wastewater Treatment Facility Headworks Rehabilitation (c402204), authorize staff to advertise for bids, and award the contract. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney, and as authorized by Resolution No. NS-27,563. The Director of Public Works is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget.

BACKGROUND: The City of Santa Cruz (City) Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) is located at 110 California Street in Santa Cruz, California. The City’s headworks structure was originally constructed in 1965, with major upgrades to the screens in 1988. The wastewater infrastructure assets installed during those upgrades are approaching the end of their service life and require rehabilitation and replacement.

The headworks system can be divided into two portions: the County’s force main and the City’s gravity sewers. This project focuses on the city-owned system, which takes in flows from the 54- inch and 30-inch diameter gravity sewer lines from the east side of the City, and the 42-inch diameter line from the west side. These gravity sewer lines enter the headworks vault, where flows are combined and conveyed to the influent box, along with the septage flow from the septage receiving stations. The combined flow is screened by the motorized bar screens and then pumped to the downstream treatment system by the influent pump station (IPS). The IPS consists of a sloped wet well and six horizontally mounted dry-pit centrifugal pumps, marking the end of the headworks system. The headworks structure is typically exposed to harsh environments, such as hydrogen sulfide and moist air, which can cause structural deterioration over time, thereby weakening the system’s integrity. Recently completed condition assessments prioritized the headworks project as a high priority project to ensure ongoing reliable 24/7 operation of the WWTF.

DISCUSSION: Design engineering firm, Brown & Caldwell, was contracted by Public Works to design and engineer the rehabilitation of the Headworks process. The headworks project consists of structural rehabilitation of the headworks vault, headwork box, influent box, meter vault, screens wet well, screen channels, and the IPS wet well. These concrete structures have internal corrosion damage that requires cleaning, rebuilding, and corrosion protection coating to prevent structural failure in the future. The isolation gates in this area have considerable

18.1 aluminum oxide corrosion build up, impacting the functionality of the gates, causing operational difficulties and leaks. The aluminum inlet gates in front of the mechanical bar screens are frozen in place and cannot be operated properly. These issues made the channel difficult for plant staff to access and perform maintenance activities. These aluminum gates have reached the end of their service life and will be replaced with stainless steel gates in this project. Stainless steel materials are highly resistant to the corrosive environment and offer an extended service lifespan.

Two influent pumps also need to be replaced due to age and wear. The pump and motors are in a horizontal configuration and the motors are situated in the dry well below the wet well water surface elevation. Given the extreme weather conditions the city has experienced in the last decade, if the dry well were to flood, the motors would be damaged, significantly impacting WWTF operations. To enhance system reliability, this project will involve replacing all pump penetrations (which were observed to be leaking during high water levels) and improve two pumps with submersible motors due to the potential flooding risks and the age of the existing equipment. Additionally, WWTF staff have reported cable failures in pump motors in the past, necessitating replacement. The project will also address the conduits and wiring for equipment and instruments in the pump station area. Most of these conduits and wires are 40 to 50 years old, and the conduits in the levels of the IPS located below grade are suffering from corrosion and are mostly at or beyond their operational life. This project will also upgrade the ventilation system at the headworks facility to improve the air quality within the screen room, which will improve worker comfort, health, and safety.

In general, the project focused on the City Headworks System and targets rehabilitation of several structures, process equipment, electrical and instrumentation, and ventilation of the influent pump station.

In order to employ a proficient contractor and to comply with the prerequisites of the Infrastructure State Revolving Fund loan, Public Works proceeded with prequalifying suitable contractors through a Request for Qualifications solicitation that was advertised on February 29, 2024. Public Works’ staff will evaluate contractors’ Statements of Qualifications and the top three to five contractors will be invited to bid on the WWTF Headworks Rehabilitation project.

The anticipated construction project schedule is as follows:

Prequalification: April 2024
Advertise for Bids: June 2024
Start Construction: April 2025
Complete Construction: November 2026
On October 24, 2023, Council passed a borrowers resolution authorizing Public Works to apply for and accept a loan from California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, Infrastructure State Revolving Fund (IBank) in the amount of $33,500,000. $23,500,000 of the loan is anticipated to fund the WWTF Headworks Rehabilitation project and associated cost. The balance of the I bank loan will fund a separate project (54” Liner project) which is scheduled to start construction in May 2024.

The Engineer’s estimate is $17,000,000. The project will be funded with “Pay as you go” funds and proceeds through the IBank loan.

18.2 Plans and specifications can be found online at:
https://www.cityofsantacruz.com/publicworksprojects
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Wastewater Capital Investment Program FY 2025 project Wastewater Treatment Facility Headworks Rehabilitation (c402204). There is no impact to the General Fund.

Prepared By:

Niao Yan, P.E.

Associate Professional
Engineer
Submitted By:

Nathan Nguyen, P.E.

Director of Public Works
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Plans and specifications can be found online at:
https://www.cityofsantacruz.com/publicworksprojects

18.3 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 03/21/2024
AGENDA OF: 04/09/2024
DEPARTMENT: Human Resources
SUBJECT: CalPERS Contract Amendment (HR)
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Adopt a resolution declaring the Council’s intention to approve an amendment to its contract with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) to provide for a new local ocean beach lifeguard member category with Section 7522.25(d) (2.7% @ 57 Full formula), and Section 21574 (Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) with 0% prior service, and 2) Introduce for publication an ordinance approving an amendment to the contract between the Board of Administration and California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) to provide a new local ocean beach lifeguard member category 2.7% at 57 full formula and Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits with 0% prior service.

BACKGROUND: The most recent Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with Supervisory Employees Operating Engineers, Local #3 (OE3), approved August 19, 2022, and Santa Cruz Firefighters, I.A.F.F Local 1716 (Fire), approved September 17, 2022, include a modification to move the Marine Safety Officer (MSO) from Supervisors OE3 representaion to Fire representation as the MSO classification is supervised by the Fire Department and the job duties are more closely aligned with the mission and functions of the fire service.

The MSO, who reports directly to the Santa Cruz Fire Marine Captain, provides continuity for the Marine Safety Division. Their responsibilities include responding to all emergencies in and along the Santa Cruz City coastline, training Santa Cruz Fire marine rescue personnel, recruiting and training lifeguards, ocean safety education, and general oversight of the Marine Safety Division.

Part of the movement of the MSO classification to fire includes amending the contract with CalPERS to provide the 2.7% @ 57 safety retirement benefit formula for MSO classification.

This amendment is contractually obligated with these bargaining units to take effect as soon as the City’s contract with CalPERS can be amended.

DISCUSSION: Monthly retirement allowances are determined by the employees’ age at retirement, the retirement plan formula, years of service, and final compensation. This new formula will provide 2.7% of final compensation (three (3) year average) for each year of credited service upon retirement at/after age 57.

19.1 The CalPERS contract amendment process requires the City to adopt the attached resolution of intention, as well as an ordinance that amends the CalPERS contract. The California Government Code requires a twenty-day (20) waiting period between adoption of the resolution of intention and the final adoption (second reading) of the ordinance. Therefore, it is proposed that the final adoption (second reading) of the ordinance be on April 30, 2024. The proposed ordinance will take effect on May 30, 2024 (thirty (30) days following adoption) and the amendment to the CalPERS contract will take effect on June 8, 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT: CalPERS has performed an actuarial study and requires the City to disclose the following information as a result of this contract amendment.

The annual increase to the General Fund will be approximately $5,656.00. This cost will increase/decrease in future years depending on CalPERS investment performance and on changes to the demography of the workforce.

Prepared By:

Debbie Levy
HR Analyst II
Submitted By:

Sara De Leon
Human Resources Director
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. RESOLUTION OF INTENT.DOC

2. EXHIBIT A.PDF

3. ORDINANCE.DOC

19.2 RESOLUTION NO. NS-30,XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ

OF INTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the Public Employees’ Retirement Law permits the participation of public agencies and their employees in the Public Employees’ Retirement System by the execution of a contract, and sets forth the procedure by which said public agencies may elect to subject themselves and their employees to amendments to said Law; and WHEREAS, one of the steps in the procedures to amend this contract is the adoption by the governing body of the public agency of a resolution giving notices of its intention to approve an amendment to said contract, which resolution shall contain a summary of the change proposed in said contract; and
WHEREAS, the following is a statement of the proposed change:

To provide for a new local ocean beach lifeguard member category with Section 7522.25(d) (2.7% @ 57 Full Formula) and Section 21574 (Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) with 0% prior service.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz does hereby give notice of intention to approve an amendment to the contract between said public agency and the Board of Administration of the Public Employees’ Retirement System, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, as an “Exhibit” and by this reference made a part hereof.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of April, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: __________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: ____________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

19.3 19.4

19.5 19.6

19.7 19.8

19.9 19.10
ORDINANCE NO. 2024-XX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO

THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION AND CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO PROVIDE A NEW LOCAL OCEAN BEACH LIFEGUARD MEMBER CATEGORY 2.7% @ 57 FULL FORMULA AND FOURTH LEVEL OF 1959 SURVIVOR BENEFITS WITH 0% PRIOR SERVICE
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz as follows:

SECTION 1. That an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, is hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked Exhibit, and by such reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full.

SECTION 2. The Mayor of the City of Santa Cruz is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of said Agency.

SECTION 3. The ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after final adoption.

PASSED FOR PUBLICATION this 9th day of April, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: __________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: ____________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

19.11 ORDINANCE NO.

PASSED FOR FINAL ADOPTION this XX day of XX, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: __________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: ____________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
This is to certify that the above
And foregoing document is the
original of Ordinance No. 2024-XX
and that it has been published or
posted in accordance with the
Charter of the City of Santa Cruz
_______________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

19.12 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 03/25/2024
AGENDA OF: 04/09/2024
DEPARTMENT: City Manager/Public Works
SUBJECT: West Cliff 50-year Vision, Grant Application for West Cliff Dr. Pilot (including One-way Vehicle with Dedicated Bike and Pedestrian Lanes), and Lighthouse Point Study (CM/PW)
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Comment on and adopt the West Cliff 50-year Community Vision; 2) Receive updates on Public Works infrastructure projects related to West Cliff; 3) Adopt a resolution authorizing and directing staff to apply for, accept, and appropriate grant funds for a West Cliff Dr. pilot (Pilot) to test and explore a transportation option that includes one-way vehicle access with dedicated bike and pedestrian lanes and neighborhood traffic calming, in the amount not to exceed $3.5 million and from the California Active Transportation Program Quick Build Program, a grant program administered by the California Department of Transportation, and authorize the City Manager to execute, in forms approved by the City Attorney, any agreements or amendments necessary for the application and acceptance; 4) Direct staff to return to Council with quantitative and qualitative data from the Pilot at six months after Pilot begins, and every six months thereafter; and 5) Direct staff to complete a geologic hazard analysis and preliminary engineering study for Lighthouse Point.

BACKGROUND: West Cliff Drive between Columbia Street and David Way was severely damaged by large swells during the January 2023 storms, causing portions of the roadway and path to fail, along with impacts to public access points, utility infrastructure, and the surrounding neighborhood. Initial work was focused on emergency protective measures geared toward safety and access. Additionally, community interest in support of accelerated decision-making regarding management of the West Cliff area was activated.

Post-disaster, the City assembled an integrated, citywide team (Team) to holistically address the damage, existing in process work, and development of adjusted next steps as West Cliff is a

20.1 cherished public amenity that should be accessible to all for a variety of uses.1 The extended
team also included consulting and engineering partners, regulatory agencies, funders, the community, and community groups.

Over the course of the past year, the Team has coordinated and delivered the following:
- Numerous and substantive “community conversations” (Conversations) including garage meetings, outreach along West Cliff Dr, in person and online community meetings, online surveys and feedback forums, a focus group, a public opinion research poll, a Council Study Session, and Council meeting discussions. - A three-year post-recover focused roadmap: “A Resilient West Cliff, Accessible to All Roadmap”.
- Funding and approval of infill walls along West Cliff Dr o Walls at 920, 932, 1016, and 1030 West Cliff Dr
o Construction began in September 2023 and is slated be completed in December 2024.
- Bethany Curve
o Final design anticipated end of April 2024
o Targeted complete construction by end of 2024
- 800 West Cliff
o Began coordination with State Parks on determining ownership o Began analysis of repairs options and funding mechanisms - 960 West Cliff
o 2024 sinkhole protection
o Qualifying for emergency grant funding
- Sacramento Outfall Repair
o Winter 2024 rainfall events decimated the storm drain outfall at Sacramento Ave. o Temporary repair to the pipe and plastic protection was installed to avoid further erosion
o Temporary closure of path section. Detour to sidewalk on northside of roadway o Qualifying for emergency grant funding
- Temporary Traffic Control Measures:
o Path closure and new crosswalks at Sacramento Ave and Auburn Ave o Path restrictions at 800 West Cliff Dr
o Striping and intersection improvements on Delaware Ave between Almar Ave and Surfside Ave
o Traffic calming improvements on Almar Ave between West Cliff and Delaware o Speed cushions on Plateau Ave between Woodrow and Almar will be installed in April 2024
o Speed bumps and residential access restrictions on Pelton and Clark o Roadway closures on Oxford and Alta between Woodrow and Almar o Intersection modifications at Woodrow Ave and Plateau Ave o Maintained pedestrian, cyclist, and resident access on West Cliff Dr between David Way and Columbia St during construction efforts
- Columbia St to Woodrow Ave One-Way Pilot and Evaluation 1 Project related information, related sites to link to, and community outreach information can be found at:
https://www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-departments/city-manager/west-cliff

20.2 At the May 23, 2023 Council meeting, Council directed staff to prepare a 50-year vision for West Cliff. This vision was to be community-based and bring to life its aspirations and future uses for West Cliff, considering long-term resource allocations and building disaster resilience. “Thinking 50 years into the future, and really when I was looking at the vision statement for the Army Corps of Engineers, and it says, ‘Engineering solutions to our nation’s toughest challenges.’ And so I feel like this is one of those things. This is maybe not our nation’s toughest challenge, but it is a local, tough challenge right now that I think is one that we have a sense of urgency to unite and address.” (emphasis added)
Vice Mayor Renee Golder at May 23, 2023 Council meeting Using an iterative, data-driven, intensive community outreach-based approach, the Team connected with the community via extensive citywide community meetings, community partner check-ins, Focus Group sessions, and community conversations at Council meetings (including one study session). Prior to March 20242, the City engaged approximately 2,160 touch points through in person and virtual meetings (540 people), surveys (500 people), and public opinion research (1,120 people).

Cover of February 23, 2024 Draft + Artwork to Show Possible Future West Cliff The full report can be found at:
https://www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-departments/city-manager/west-cliff/50-yearvision-draft 2 These connection statistics will significantly increase with comments and feedback for the draft 50-year Community Vision.

20.3 DISCUSSION:

I. 50-year Community Vision
The eight-month process to develop the 50-year Community Vision was community-based and informed by a broad base of informal and formal opinions, with engaged and passionate conversations amongst City community members, Council, neighborhoods, interest groups, funders, other agencies, City staff, and industry experts.

Artwork by Farallon Strategies
Community, Council, Neighborhood Groups, Local Interest Groups, Funders, Other Agencies, and City Staff Dynamic Coast Study Session
Process Overview
Initial Themes + Uses
Community Feedback - Ranking & Sharing
3-Year Postrecovery Roadmap
50-year Community Vision
Erosion Concepts
Categories – Habitat, Recreation, Mobility &
Transportation, Beaches
4 Scenarios with Categories – Habitat, Recreation, Mobility & Transportation, Beaches =>
Threads
Data Validation of Threads from
4 Scenarios
Public Opinion Research: West Cliff Awareness, Attitudes, Uses, Future Uses, Proposals, and Traffic Options
Data Crunching with Narratives =>
Draft 50-year Community Vision
15+ Community Conversations
640+ Touch Points
West Cliff Focus Group – 6 Meetings
16 Community Conversations 2,160 Touch Points 540 People 1, 120 Public Opinion Research Poll Respondents 500 Online Survey Takers Background and Process
Community-based Themes and Uses
Consecutive Drill-down on Concepts, Themes, and Uses => Categories , Scenarios =>
Threads of Vision
Weaving of Threads
February - August August 2023 - March 2024 => 2023
Process Steps to Develop 50-year Community Vision, with Highlights of Community Outreach Ultimately, the data from the community spoke volumes and drove the 50-year Community Vision.

A. Data Sources
As a shared expression of the City’s values for West Cliff, the 50-year Community Vision was woven from common themes that emerged throughout the project as well as the previous one for a Three-year Post-recovery Roadmap. The Team creatively engaged with a broad mix of community members to find common, underlying threads that would make up the woven product.

As interim options to aid in further exploration, the community voices were packaged in four possible scenarios:

1. Natural Feature Restoration

2. Hold the Line

3. Hybrid

4. Park Only

20.4 December 5, 2023 Scenarios
These scenarios were not intended to set four specific possibilities for the future. They were vehicles to package aspects of West Cliff – from the following categories:
 Mobility and Transportation
 Recreation
 Habitat Enhancement
 Beaches
Based upon feedback3 for the aspects under these categories and previous community conversations, the Team determined high priority threads from the community. In January, the data that drove the threads was summarized and presented in an online forum for further community feedback. Additionally, to ensure statistical significance, the City hired EMC Research, a full-service market research and data analytics firm who works with thousands of clients across the country, to do a public opinion research poll of City voters (Poll).

With participation from City Manager’s Office, Climate Action, Public Works, Farallon Strategies, Vice Mayor Golder and Councilmember Kalantari-Johnson, the Poll was drafted with EMC and ran from December 7, 2023 through January 10, 2024. Sent to City randomly selected registered voters via postcard, email, and text messaging, the Poll yielded 1,120 interviews (the Poll’s overall margin of error was ±2.93 percentage points). EMC required a minimum sample size of 350 registered voters (which the community far exceeded) for the results to be representative of the City and for results to be statistically significant.

The Poll was proportional to where voters reside in the City. The “impacted neighbors” area (see map) represents 12% of the responses because 12% of the City’s registered voters reside within 3 From in person participants at a December 5, 2023 in person community conversation and 200+ online survey respondents.

20.5 this area. Similarly, 88% of the responses came from those outside the “impacted neighbors” area because 88% of the City’s registered voters live outside of this area.

EMC Research Poll – Delineation of Map Boundaries for Impacted Neighbors and Rest of Santa Cruz Voting Community The Poll progressed through the following question areas:
 Issue Environment
 Past West Cliff Usage
 Current West Cliff Usage
 Future West Cliff – Usage and Proposals. The latter had questions areas around:
o All of West Cliff
o West Cliff Dr more specifically
 Future Traffic Patterns

20.6 Highlights of the EMC results are below, with the full presentation in the attachments (see URL above):

20.7 The uses and proposals then led to a Future Traffic Patterns section that enquired on two traffic concepts – one-way and two-way. The original questions about two-way vs. one-way concepts were then followed by open questions about likes and concerns, and a final forced choice yielded the following:

20.8 B. Top Threads and the Pillars of the 50-year Community Vision The most expressed thread from the community from the events and surveys was the prioritization of bike and pedestrian access, followed by beach access, environmental and habitat concerns given our dynamic coast, and the need for additional traffic control measures.

These community-based priorities became the 9 pillars for the 50-year Community Vision:

20.9 Details for each area are in the draft 50-year Community Vision.

C. Community Feedback for Draft 50-year Community Vision The City released the draft of the 50-year Community Vision on February 23, 2024, along with a corresponding online survey where the community was invited to share their feedback.

The community provided feedback via an in-person community conversation on February 29th.

Additionally, the City received 354 responses to the online survey when the survey closed on March 13, 2024. A few examples of feedback include:
 Desire for additional details on the Sustainability and Resilience Committee  Requests for additional traffic calming measures in specific areas  Requests for a commitment from the City to work with those residing on the Lower Westside
All of the above comments, along with many others, were reflected in the updated 50-year Community Vision or in this agenda report.

D. Other Recommendations and Next Steps
Sustainability and Resilience Committee. The 50-year Community Vision work was very positively impacted and could not have been done without the combination of ad hoc community participation as well as the on-going, in-depth critical analysis and comment from the diverse West Cliff Focus Group (Focus Group). West Cliff and other climate impacted areas – beaches, San Lorenzo River, etc. – of the City would benefit greatly from such candid, consistent review of draft work.

Based upon this, the Team is recommending that an on-going group be formed to act as a advisory sounding board and review point for not just West Cliff, but broader City work in other areas impacted by resiliency and sustainability issues that require stewardship under the rapidly changing world of climate change.

Updates. Every ten years, the City must update its Local Costal Program (LCP). Knowing that the 50-year Community Vision needs to evolve under the changing conditions of the dynamic coast, the City should leverage the LCP update cadence to efficiently share resources and community conversations and make necessary content synchronizations. This does not preclude the need for more frequent updates for the 50-year Community Vision should conditions warrant them – be it impactful changes in jurisdictional, regulatory, environmental, or financial bounds.

Roadmap and Other Plans. The 50-year Community Vision guides decisions in all policy, program, and project documents. The City will engage the community and work across departments and partners to implement the Vision and improve resilience along West Cliff through A Resilient West Cliff Accessible to All Roadmap (Roadmap). Adopted in August 2023, the Roadmap will need to be further updated based upon the 50-year Community Vision, specifically beyond its first three-year post-recovery focus. Additionally, the City must continue to deliver on regulatory documents that impact West Cliff – the LCP, the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, and other coastal policies.

From Vision to Action. The Council and community jointly called on the City to take stances and actions to have hopes of saving a beloved and iconic part of Santa Cruz.

20.10 To re-iterate key direction for this project:
“Thinking 50 years into the future, and really when I was looking at the vision statement for the Army Corps of Engineers, and it says, ‘Engineering solutions to our nation’s toughest challenges.’ And so I feel like this is one of those things. This is maybe not our nation’s toughest challenge, but it is a local, tough challenge right now that I think is one that we have a sense of urgency to unite and address.” (emphasis added)
Vice Mayor Renee Golder at May 23, 2023 Council meeting In response to the draft document:
“The City’s 50-year vision for West Cliff Drive is a key visioning step towards advancing longer term adaptation planning for bicyclists, pedestrians, vehicles, beachgoers, and other users of this critical segment of the California Coastal Trail, beloved by residents and visitors from across California and the globe. We would like to commend this City for responding to the storms with momentum and drive, and for producing a draft “50-year Community Vision for West Cliff” that acknowledges the difficult choices and trade-offs integral to coastal adaptation and resiliency planning.” Kevin Kahn, Central Coast District Manager, California Coastal Commission March 15, 2024 Letter
Adopting the 50-year Community Vision is a critical action moving the City toward preserving a future West Cliff for generations to come. As was acknowledged in the feedback around the “Hold the Line” scenario, constant rebuilding West Cliff as it now stands is not sustainable.

Moving toward the changes that the community spoke about through the 50-year Community Vision moves the City toward a potentially sustainable future version of West Cliff.

Therefore, additional next steps in using the pillars of the 50-year Community Vision are recommended as follows:
 Implement a pilot to test a West Cliff transportation corridor with dedicated lanes for bicycles, pedestrians, and one-lane of vehicles.
 Study and develop mitigation recommendations for Lighthouse Point.

These tangible next steps align with the 50-year Community Vision in these ways:
50-year Community Vision Pillar
Dedicated Bike,
Pedestrian, One-way
Pilot
Engineering Study of
Lighthouse Point
Balancing Change and a Collective Future X X
Beauty, Resilience and Continued Uses X X
Prioritizing Pedestrian and Bicycle Access X X
One-way Vehicle Access and Additional
Traffic Control X
Limited Hard Armoring X
Exploring Nature-based Solutions and
Engineered Natural Feature Restoration X
Park Space as Recreation Area and Buffer X X
Planned Relocation X (Road)
Collaboration X X

20.11 II. Transportation and Grant Application
The Team seeks Council approval to submit a funding request to the Caltrans Active Transportation Quick Build program for a West Cliff One-way Pilot program (Pilot). The pilot approach is used when testing out a concept and calls for informed adjustments and better next steps in response to a pilot’s data collection.

Active Transportation refers to human forms of transportation - in particular, walking and bicycling. The Pilot aligns with other City Active Transportation work, and would bring many key aspects of the 2017 Active Transportation Plan to this area of the City. It would improve multimodal mobility, increase safety for people walking and biking, and increase the number of people using non-auto forms of travel.

The intent of this funding request is to construct a one-way transportation corridor as called for in the 50-year Community Vision by utilizing quick build materials designed to be able to be adjusted during a pilot period as needed. Quick build materials are designed to be temporary - a more flexible approach than traditional infrastructure.

The pilot period would run for a period of two years with programmed check in points every six months at Council at which time staff would provide analytical updates and potential options for improvement. At the end of the two-years, staff would seek Council direction to maintain or remove the Pilot.

A. Pilot Description and Duration
In order to collect, measure, and analyze empirical transportation and user data around the pillars of “Prioritizing Pedestrian and Bicycle Access” and “One-way Vehicle Access and Additional Traffic Controls”, the Team recommends pursuit of a grant via the Active Transportation Program Quick Build program (Quick Build). The application is due in June 2024 with award announcements anticipated in December 2024. The schedule for implementation would align with completion of the Bethany Culvert, anticipated by fall 2025, in order to allow for continuous travel along the entire West Cliff Dr corridor (Corridor).

The West Cliff Dr One-way Pilot grant application will request funding to implement a one-way westbound roadway between Bay Street and Swanton Boulevard. The existing eastbound automobile lane would be converted to a two-way protected bicycle facility. The existing multiuse path would become a pedestrian only facility.

In order to address the travel changes in the entire study area, this grant would also include traffic calming tools within the surrounding neighborhood. These tools would be from the adopted City of Santa Cruz Traffic Calming Toolbox. A preliminary plan of these elements is included as “West Cliff Drive – Initial Traffic Calming Features”.

The Quick Build grant program is designed to test projects similar to the West Cliff project.

Specific to this funding source, the intention is to allow for flexibility in implementing new ideas, recognizing that they may need to be modified during the pilot as data is gathered and new tools tested. During the two-year pilot time period, there will be regular touchpoints for engagement. The evaluation criteria set forth in the next section will inform pilot changes.

20.12 B. Pilot Evaluation Criteria
The grant application for the Pilot will include multiple avenues for evaluation and iteration.

These are planned to include vehicular volume and speed along the Corridor and within the study area, multimodal user counts on the Corridor, and public opinion poll research.

As part of the measurement and iterative nature of the funding source, staff would commit to addressing vehicular traffic volume concerns in the study area should local roads exceed 1,000 vehicles per day or if the 85th percentile speed exceeds 25 miles per hour on routes with substantial changes in traffic and prioritize implementation based on the measured impacts within the allowable funding. Tools used to address these impacts would come from the adopted Traffic Calming Toolkit.

III. Lighthouse Point Hazard Analysis and Engineering Study Zone 3 of West Cliff Dr includes Lighthouse Point and contains seven different coastal armoring structures and ten areas of erosion concern. Within the next ten years, three areas of erosion concern are identified as high-risk erosion likely to impact the Recreational Trail and/or West Cliff Dr. These include a substantial sea cave at Lighthouse Point that could affect the Lighthouse, existing seawall, access points, and surf break. In addition, several undercuts could likely undermine portions of the Recreational Trail. Four of the areas of erosion concern are deemed high hazard, and if they erode, would likely affect the Recreational Trail, parking, and potentially West Cliff Dr (Figure 3-3) below. In addition to the threats described above, recent dramatic bluff failures have occurred in popular access and use points to the Steamers Lane surf break, highlighting the unpredictable nature of coastal erosion.

Building on the work completed in 2021, the Lighthouse Point study would evaluate potential hazards and threats created by ongoing bluff erosion and undermining by the known sea cave, and explore potential mitigation strategies and engineering solutions. This would include the application of engineered and nature-based solutions to preserve and protect existing infrastructure, formal and informal recreational access and use areas, and address safety issues associated with bluff fracture and deposition into surf break areas. The study will also seek to define how ongoing encroachment of the existing sea cave will impact the Lighthouse/surfing museum, as well as associated surf breaks. The study area would focus on the segment of coastline from the eastern edge of ITs beach to the eastern end of the parking area by Lighthouse Point recreation area.

The estimated cost to complete the hazard analysis and preliminary design is $150,000. To proceed, a new general fund appropriation would be required. If directed to proceed with the study, Public Works will include a general fund request of $150,000 for an existing project West Cliff Resiliency and Accessibility (c402305) as part of the proposed FY 2025 Capital Investment Program budget. Professional services would be procured through a qualifications-based selection process, and the study would likely take 9-14 months to complete.

20.13 Source: Figure 3-3 West Cliff Drive Adaptation and Management Plan IV. Policy Applicability
In addition to the Active Transportation Plan and Climate Action 2030 relevancy, the 50-year Community Vision has strong ties the City’s 2019 Health in All Policies (HiAP) program. HiAP recognizes the City's role in supporting community well-being through policy and decision making by prioritizing three pillars: equity, public health, and sustainability. Delivering equitable access is critical to HiAP, as is continuing equitable community engagement. The 50-year Community Vision would also enact decision making parameters for sustainability via its focus on balancing change, resilience, limited hard armoring, and exploration of nature-based solutions and natural feature restoration. Active transportation (pedestrian and bicycle use) in the 50-year Community Vision further epitomizes sustainability and public health.

FISCAL IMPACT:
 Adoption of 50-year Community Vision - none.
 For the Pilot to test a West Cliff transportation corridor with dedicated lanes for bicycles, pedestrians, and one-lane of vehicles, the grant budget is in process and anticipated not to exceed $3,500,000. No match is required for this fund source and there would be no impact to the General Fund.
 The Lighthouse Point Hazard Analysis and Engineering Study would be $150,000 from the General Fund’s Capital Investment Program in FY 2025.

20.14 Prepared By:

Kevin Crossley, P.E.

Assistant Director of Public
Works
Matt Starkey, P.E.

Transportation Manager
Laura Schmidt
Assistant City Manager
Submitted By:

Nathan Nguyen, P.E.

Director of Public Works
Laura Schmidt
Assistant City Manager
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. WEST CLIFF ONE-WAY PILOT RESOLUTION

2. PILOT SAMPLE APPLICATION

3. INITIAL TRAFFIC CALMING FEATURES

4. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION COMMENT LETTER

20.15 RESOLUTION NO. NSRESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ AUTHORIZING

AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE, IN FORMS APPROVED BY THE

CITY ATTORNEY, ANY AGREEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE

APPLICATION, ACCEPTANCE, AND APPROPRIATION OF THE CALIFORNIA ACTIVE

TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM QUICK BUILD PROGRAM, A GRANT PROGRAM

ADMINISTERED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FOR A

WEST CLIFF DRIVE ONE-WAY VEHICLE PILOT
WHEREAS, the City Council has initiated the West Cliff 50-year Community Vision (Vision); and
WHEREAS, in order to test and explore a transportation option from the Vision that includes one-way vehicle access with dedicated bike and pedestrian lanes and neighborhood traffic calming; and
WHEREAS, to collect, measure, and analyze empirical transportation and user data around the pillars of “Prioritizing Pedestrian and Bicycle Access” and “One-way Vehicle Access and Additional Traffic Controls”
WHEREAS, authorize and direct staff to apply for, accept, and appropriate grant funds, in the amount not to exceed $3.5 million; and
WHEREAS, direct staff to return to Council with quantitative and qualitative data from the two-year Pilot at six months after Pilot begins, and every six months thereafter.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz that the City Manager is authorized and directed to execute any agreements or amendments necessary, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for the application and acceptance of the California Active Transportation Program Quick Build Program for a West Cliff Drive one-way vehicle pilot.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of April 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: __________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: ________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

20.16 DRAFT Active Transportation Program
Quickbuild Pilot - City of Santa Cruz
West Cliff Drive One Way Pilot
Project Summary: The City of Santa Cruz will construct a new 2.5 mile two-way separated bike lane on West Cliff Drive between Bay Street and Swanton Boulevard utilizing a quick-build method of delivery.

This will be achieved by converting the existing eastbound lane of vehicular traffic to the new bike facility and changing the travel pattern for vehicles to one way westbound. The existing multiuse path will become a pedestrian only facility. The resulting configuration will include one lane of westbound automobile traffic, a two way bicycle facility, and a wide pedestrian facility the entire 2.5 miles of West Cliff Drive. In order to manage the change in vehicular transportation patterns in the study area, this will also include quickbuild neighborhood traffic management installations. This quick-build pilot will be in place for a period of two years at which point City Council will determine if the project should remain and seek further funding for a more permeant installation or if the project should be removed.

Primary objectives: In reducing automobile traffic to one lane, the additional space created for people walking and biking will result in more people using active transportation on a facility that feels safer and more comfortable for people walking and biking. This pilot project will measure the change in volume of people using active transportation on the West Cliff Drive Corridor as well as qualitative measures of how people feel about the change to the corridor.

What will it look like:

In order to implement the pilot, signage, striping, and vertical barriers will be installed along corridor to define a new two-way separated bike facility and a change to a one-way westbound roadway. Stirping and signage will follow MUTCD standards. Vertical barriers will be chosen from the Caltrans Quick-Build Supplemental Guidance and focus on durability, aesthetics, utility, and maintenance. Preferred features for the vertical elements include curb and post.

How we got here:

West Cliff Drive is a gem of the California Coast. The 2.5 mile roadway hugs the coast and offers some of the most iconic vistas in central California. Currently, West Cliff Drive has two lanes of automobile traffic and a multiuse pathway. Users of all modes have long loved spending time on West Cliff, but a widely

20.17 held community sentiment is that the existing multiuse path is overloved and therefore overcrowded by the volume of people walking and biking who want to enjoy it, leading to crowding and user conflicts.

Conversations about how to allocate space for various modes of transportation have been ongoing for years, but in 2023, our community was forced to address this friction head on.

In January 2023, the City of Santa Cruz experienced a bomb cyclone storm event and subsequent severe weather events. As part of this, portions of the iconic West Cliff Drive multiuse path failed, leading to collapse in to the ocean and the full loss of use of portions of the active transportation facility. This required a portion of the corridor to transition to one way vehicular traffic in order to maintain access for people walking and biking and kickstarted a year long outreach and engagement effort to garner feedback on the future of West Cliff Drive.

The resulting 50 Year Vision for West Cliff included nine key pillars. Two of these pillars form the basis of this funding application: Prioritizing bike and pedestrian access and One way vehicular access and additional traffic control.

Public Engagement: Extensive public engagement on this project has been completed to gain community input in support of this funding application. Using an iterative, data-driven, intensive community outreach-based approach, the Team connected with the community via extensive citywide community meetings, community partner check-ins, Focus Group sessions, and community conversations at Council meetings (including one study session). Prior to March 2024, the City engaged approximately 2,160 touch points through in person and virtual meetings (540 people), surveys (500 people), and public opinion research (1,120 people).

All data from the above are available at:
https://www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-departments/city-manager/westcliff/community-conversations-resources During the pilot program, staff will continue to engage with the community. This will be achieved via keeping a project webpage up to date, regular updates in the weekly City Manager Newsletter, social media updates, posters and flyers within the study area with a QR code to access the webpage, and a minimum of three community engagement events. In addition to this outreach, project updates will be provided to City Council every 6 months during the pilot period.

Project Delivery: The City of Santa Cruz plans to utilize a design-build process to implement this quick build. In order to augment the capacity of a small internal staff, the City will contract with a transportation engineering consulting firm to complete the quick-build design for the roadway and proposed neighborhood transportation management quick-build installations. This firm will remain on the team throughout the project in order to document any changes to design to comply with all required reporting elements of the funding program.

20.18 After designs have been completed, implementation of the quick-build pilot will commence as soon as possible. This timing will be after the completion of the Bethany Culvert in order to ensure smooth implementation and orderly transportation patterns in the study area.

How Would We Measure Impact:

This project will include multiple avenues for evaluation. Primary questions this project seeks to answer are:

1. Do bicyclist volumes increase with the addition of a two-way separated bike lane on the entire corridor?

2. Do pedestrian volumes increase with the change from a multimodal path to a pedestrian only path?

3. Do vehicular speeds and volumes within the study area remain within acceptable thresholds?

4. Does public sentiment support the conversion of an existing vehicular lane to a two-way protected bike lane and the resulting change in vehicular access to the corridor and within the study area?
For bicyclist and pedestrian data, the City of Santa Cruz has collected baseline counts. An additional preproject count will be conducted prior to project implementation. In order to measure the change in bicyclist and pedestrian volumes along the corridor, the City will utilize bike and pedestrian counts via installed counters HYPERLINK "mailto:[email protected]"during the pilot project. These findings will be reported to the funding program as part of the regular reporting process.

Vehicular volumes will be measured by utilizing big data to measure monthly changes along the corridor and within the study area during the pilot. As part of the measurement and iterative nature of the funding source, staff would commit to addressing vehicular traffic concerns in the study area should local roads exceed 1,000 vehicles per day or if the 85th percentile speed exceeds 25 miles per hour. Tools used to address these impacts would come from the adopted Traffic Calming Toolkit In order to measure public sentiment about the multimodal changes to the corridor and within the study area, the City of Santa Cruz would conduct two follow-up statistically valid polsl to the poll conducted in 2024. This poll would include questions about the user experience of walking, biking, and driving in the area, questions about safety and accessibility, and questions about overall feeling about the pilot quickbuild project.

Duration of pilot: This pilot would run for a minimum of two years. After two years, staff will return to Council for direction to maintain or remove the quickbuild pilot.

20.19 Beach St
Baldwin St
Modesto Ave
Delaware Ave
Berkshire Ave
Palm St
Western Dr
2nd St
Laurel St Extension
Grandview St
Weeks Ave
Bay St
Rankin St
Mission St
Maple St
McMillan Dr
Front St
ContinentalSt
Mission St
Graham Ave
Cowell St
Trescony St
Eucalyptus Ave
W Ave
EscalonaDr
California
St
Echo St
Main St
Toledo St
Scenic St
Jenne St
Younger Way
1st St
Cedar St
PalmettaSt
Southview Terrace
Redwood St
Clark Ave
Donna Ct
WoodlandWay
Arroyo
S
e
c
o
Bayona Dr
Handley St
Almar Ave
Delaware Ave
Oxford Wy
De la Costa Ave
Cascade
Acadia Ave
Hebard St
Anderson St
Naglee Ave
Ingalls St
Lennox St
Liberty St
Mason St
Anita St
Wave cre st Ave
Seaside St
LaderaDr
MiramarDr
Laguna St
Sunset Ave
Se
ot
n
Way
Wanzer St
W Cliff Dr
W Cliff Dr
W Cliff Dr
W Cliff Dr
W Cliff Dr
W Cliff Dr
Jeter St
Merced Ave
Heath St
Spruce St
Chico Ave
Chace St
Kenneth St
Beachview Ave
Stockton Ave
Au
b
urn
Ave
Municipal Wharf
Nevada St
Surfside Ave
Bellevue St
Separated Bike Lane in 2024
Separated Bike Lane in 2024
Multiuse Path in 2024
Multiuse Path in 2024
Separated Bike Lane in 2024
Myrtle St
Anthony St
Laurel St
Oregon St
Chestnut
St
3rd St
Younglove Ave
Natural Bridges Dr
Bay St
Getchell St
Swanton
Blvd
Fair Ave
VanNessAve
John St
Swift St
Walk Circle
LaurentSt
Centennial St
National St
Lighthouse Ave
Santa Cruz St
Wilkes Circle
AltaVistaDr
Columbia St
Gharkey St
Alta Ave
Pelton Ave
Plateau Ave
Woodrow Ave
King St
Dufour St
Traffic Calming Feature
Complete Streets Improvements Parking Lots Along West Cliff Drive All Way Stop Intersection W Cliff Dr - One Way Vehicle Circulation Planned Two-way Bike Facility Planned Pedestrian Facility Speed Humps Slow Turn Wedges Traffic Circles Bulb-Out/Curb Extension Two Lane Pinchpoints Medians Partial Closure Full Closure/ Cul - de Sacs Signal 2023 Speed Hump
West Cliff Drive: One-Way Access
P West Cliff Drive One-Way Rendering
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P P
P P
N
0 0.25 0.5 Mile
Hybrid; One-way traffic, improved bicycle and pedestrians West Cliff 2073

20.20 STATE OF CALIFORNIA — NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR

CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION

CENTRAL COAST DISTRICT
725 FRONT STREET, SUITE 300
SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060
PHONE: (831) 427-4863
WEB: WWW.COASTAL.CA.GOV
March 15, 2024
Sent Electronically
Honorable Mayor Keeley & Santa Cruz City Council
c/o Laura Schmidt, Assistant City Manager
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
[email protected]
Subject: West Cliff 50-Year Community Vision
Dear Mayor Keeley and City Councilmembers,
We want to take this opportunity to recognize the City’s effort over the last year since the January 2023 storms. The City sprang into action, addressing the immediate emergency and safety needs of damaged physical infrastructure, and then set to work on an ambitious plan to rethink the status quo and develop a long-term vision for this iconic corridor. The City’s 50-year vision for West Cliff Drive is a key visioning step towards advancing longer term adaptation planning for bicyclists, pedestrians, vehicles, beachgoers, and other users of this critical segment of the California Coastal Trail, beloved by residents and visitors from across California and the globe. We would like to commend this City for responding to the storms with momentum and drive, and for producing a draft “50-year Community Vision for West Cliff” that acknowledges the difficult choices and trade-offs integral to coastal adaptation and resiliency planning. We believe that many of the concepts articulated in this vision, including ultimately converting the corridor to one lane of travel with a dedicated bike and pedestrian space, with the idea of moving areas of the corridor slightly inland to help reduce the need for shoreline armoring and provide for natural beach and bluff functions to occur, makes sense in this context. We look forward to continuing to work with City staff and the public to further flesh out these ideas and concepts, and to effectuate them via the City’s ongoing Local Coastal Program work. We have a strong working relationship with your staff, and are confident that we will cooperatively develop a model adaptation program for this corridor that other coastal communities in California can emulate.

Thank you for your consideration, and please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions moving forward.

Sincerely,
Kevin Kahn
Central Coast District Manager
California Coastal Commission

20.21 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Don Iglesias <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2024 2:58 PM
To: City Council
Subject: [CAUTION: Verify Sender Before Opening!] Comments on Draft 50-Year Community Vision for West Cliff and a Proposal for a Tenth Pillar of the Plan
Attachments: 10th-Pillar-Coalition-Letter-Mar-8-2024.docx Please see attached letter and distribute to City Council Members and appropriate Staff.

Thank you

20.22 April 4, 2024
Santa Cruz City Council Members
809 Center Street, Room 10
City of Santa Cruz, CA 95060
RE: Comments on Draft 50-Year Community Vision for West CliƯ and a Proposal for a Tenth Pillar
Dear City Council Members,

Congratulations to the city of Santa Cruz for completing the draft of the 50-year vision.

In the Draft Fifty-Year Community Vision for West CliƯ, there are nine pillars identified that will be used as a guide, for city planning and decision making. As lower westside neighbors, we believe there is an essential need for a tenth pillar that connects the neighborhoods to the long-term vision, strategy and programs related to the future of West CliƯ, so that neighbors can coexist in safety and harmony with future plans.

Tenth Pillar Suggested Language: Westside Neighborhoods:

West CliƯ and the surrounding westside neighborhoods have coexisted for over one hundred and fifty years. They are intimately intertwined, and both are essential, to preserve the future and celebrate the unique community lifestyle that attracts residents and visitors alike.

Just as we must adapt to the changing coastline and demographic shifts, our 50-year vision needs to include the neighborhoods that are part of West CliƯ, and we need to manage how this critical element of the West CliƯ ecosystem adapts over time.

West CliƯ Neighbors are a passionate community who love West CliƯ and want to be an integral part of its evolving future.

It’s been this community that erected the Surfer Statue at the end of Pelton Street overlooking Indicators and Monterey Bay. This community opened the Surf Museum in the Lighthouse which is the symbol of our city. Additionally, neighbors have advocated for the preservation of the Monarch Butterfly Sanctuary, both at Lighthouse Field and Natural Bridges State Park. These are examples of how the neighborhood has enriched the experiences for everyone who uses West CliƯ.

Access to West CliƯ for community members and visitors will necessitate a collaborative eƯort among city planning staƯ and neighbors on the lower westside. Creative solutions to infrastructure, including, traƯic and parking, will need to be developed prior to the

20.23 implementation of any programs and action plans that arise out of the 50-year vision. As we look at the West CliƯ neighborhood in the next fifty years, we envision the lower westside neighbors enjoying a safe and desirable place for families to thrive and children to play and grow. Working hand in hand with WestcliƯ planners, we will seek pathways for a harmonious interaction between visitors and neighbors, enabling all to enjoy the beauty and resiliency of West CliƯ for future generations.

Facilities on West CliƯ should also serve neighbors and visitors alike. The success of Steamer Lane Supply and the Surf Museum are indicators that there is demand for unique experiences and services on West CliƯ. The community bootstrapped these services and wants to be part of a grander vision for what we could do with West CliƯ and how these facilities and experiences could adapt and grow in sync with the changing coastline and access methods.

Many of the West CliƯ neighborhood schools use West CliƯ in their formal curriculum.

Middle School and High School surf teams train and compete at Steamer Lane and Cowells. The Junior Guards train and compete on Cowell Beach and in the Cowell surf.

Many of the high school and university marine biology classes study tide pools and the ocean environment at our coastline. Most of these students live in the West CliƯ neighborhood and want to be part of its evolving future and become the future stewards of this vibrant coastal community.

Preserving the safety and quality of the neighborhoods abutting West CliƯ Drive needs to be a 10th pillar of the 50-year vision just as important as separate bicycling and walking pathways.

We ask that you add this 10th pillar to the 50-year vision for West CliƯ.

Thank you,
The active community members of the Lower West Side who have participated in the development of these comments and recommendations include.

Don Iglesias
Cathy Stefanki
Al Ramadan
Christine Hahn-Ramadan
Bruce Dykaar
Ginger Dykaar
Nancy Steward
Megan Dawson
James Dawson
Barbara Weigel
Tom Powers

20.24 Nadia Al-lami
Glenn Seiler
Pam Seiler

20.25 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Garrett <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2024 9:17 PM
To: City Council
Subject: 4.9.24 Agenda Item # 20 West CLiff 50 year vision

4.9.24 Agenda Item # 20 West Cliff 50 year vision
Dear Council,
I cannot reject in any stronger terms the 50 year vision for West Cliff if it involves one way car traffic. As a resident of the area (Plateau), ever since the detour started the traffic is much worse and as a ped, watch both ways. Crossing Delaware is sketchy now and long trains of cars now pass without stopping for Peds at intersections.

Your traffic calming measures on Almar/Delaware actually make it quite difficult to pass between the barriers which are getting creamed (some of them), especially so for large trucks, and actually leave LESS room for turns making it LESS safe to me. Pluse we lost parking with a lot of corner red striping where in reality, ANY parked cars make it hard to see. All those intersections are difficult to cross, and MORE TRAFFIC MAKES IT HARDER than before.

I also normally drive mostly East, not West, to the wharf, or take the "scenic drive from Natural Bridges back to my house from the north.

What really bothers me, is the illegitimacy of your methods of mass persuasion. The "workshops" were a farce. It was all "we talk", you select from our biased propositions and those workshops, as usual, were attended by special interest (like bike groups who don't live there).

Did you take attendance at those workshops. Did you allow some people to attend more than once and essentially "vote twice"?
Are your survey questions fair? Having seen a lot of your surveys they many times are multiple choice , with most choices the ones YOU want people to vote for.

Did you ever think about general questions where people just write their own answers? Like "How do you see West Cliff in 50 years?"
WHY a 50 year vision now.

I can tell you. It was because there was TOOMUCH OPPOSTION to the staffs original one-way plan, so it's "try, try, again", but this time with mas persuasion workshops spending money on special consultants that are hired to produce the results you want.

Then you filtered those responses through a hand picked special interest group meeting in secret who ere already aligned with the staff's one-way decision.

Those members of the focus group were not even all residents, and one was a BLM activist (like what does that have to do with West Cliff? NOTHING. It is political leftist affirmative action bullshit. How many focus group members were West Cliff home owners? one?

20.26 2
Your workshop methods work like this
a) the consultant does all the talking
b) no questions (unless somebody insists, and those are cut short) c) Lots of staff around giving people LOTS, and LOTS of choices that appeal to special interest, only ONE of which is then "keep it like it is" which is downplayed d) don't take roll
e) divide people into groups where minority opinion is not recorded, only some fake "consensus" which is not consensus. consensus by definition is 100%, not what some "leader of the group writes down as majority opinion (maybe majority opinion, or is it just larger plurality opinion? f) Record the watered down results.

I have no idea about random polling, all I know is polls can vary according to the questions asked, and are easily manipulated.

I sure know you didn't poll me.

As far as treating the local residents as "equal votes" with the city, ABSURD. Many of the people polled maybe don't even use West Cliff.

These methods have been used over and over for Climate change, or bogus "citizen initiative bond measure meetings" that were dropped like a hot rock when the manipulation failed.

My level of respect for these methods is zero. They are all about "plausibly making it seem like all this was the public idea.

Of course it wasn't. It came from you!! and you pushed it hard.

The LIE of all this is over 2000 signatures were signed on a petition within 10 day or so of this announcement of a one-way plan.

You have wasted enough, and I mean wasted, enough taxpayer money one this, and disgrace yourselves with what looks like mass persuasion deceit.

PLENTY of people don't want it. You give them the finger by your actions.

Garrett Philipp - Lower Westside

20.27 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: DK <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2024 11:37 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Traffic calming measures on Oxford Way need to stay in place As a 62 year resident of Santa Cruz , and my father being a homeowner near the corner of Oxford and David Way, we would both like to comment on the proposed one way West Cliff Drive.

At the age of 10 my Main Coon cat was hit and killed 10 feet from me as we crossed the street from a car making the corner at David Way onto Oxford Way . It could have been me , and the driver just kept going. Before the traffic calming measures it was no different. Cars would ( and still do) routinely run the three way stop sign at David Way and Oxford way . I can only imagine what it would be like if West Cliff is made one way and there are no traffic calming devices left in place at Bethany Curve.

The vast majority of people (I would venture to say) are in favor of keeping West Cliff drive a two way street . I know my Father and do hope it remains that way.

John Knoll Jr
John Knoll Sr.
310 Oxford Way

20.28 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Dustin Mulvaney <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 9:35 AM
To: City Council; dl_CityPW; Erika Smart; Save West Cliff Subject: Comments on 50 year vision
To whom it may concern,
I am writing about the west cliff 50 year vision which is on the agenda before City Council Tuesday April 9th. I'll start by saying this last part feels rushed. We had two weeks (+3 days) to comment on 50 year vision plan when released. This after a year of work collecting feedback. The City should have posted a timeline to communicate to the public what this process would look like. The draft should have been released with appropriate review time, and then the published a final draft with this feedback incorporated should also have been released for public consideration for adequate time before coming before City Counsel. Here we are less than a month after comments were submitted and we are voting on authorizing public funds. The final report was just updated and released yesterday, and you are voting on it Tuesday?
This process did not collect meaningful public feedback. The review period process should mirror the ways the Coastal Commission solicits and incorporates public feedback.

I participated in as many of the public meetings as possible, but unfortunately was not invited to and did not know about some of the early "garage sessions" that sound like they were more open forums. The meetings I did go to were very narrow and focused on getting feedback on pre-decided scenarios. The only way to interact was via third party software on preselected scenarios. There was no way to voice ideas in addition to those scenarios chosen by the consultants. As a result we have these monolithic one size-fits-all scenarios that are focused on automobiles and how many lanes they get.

The scenarios presented were overly narrow and did not surface the best 50 year vision for west cliff. The City needs to be presented with more options and break away from this car-centered mold of one and two lanes for the entire length.

There were no mixed ideas, for example that have one way in some places, two way in others, no cars in others. For example, the City could close westcliff to all cars between lighthouse and Columbia Ave. apartments. That's a scenario the City explored in the 1980s, but never surfaced in this conversation/public process because the city process was not able to collect feedback from the city given the tools the consultants used.

The City should draw on old ideas considered in the past planning efforts to inform the westcliff vision instead of starting from scratch.

Several times during meetings I asked if consultants or staff from City had looked at plans from past which included full road closures along parts of west cliff. These are from the early 1980s. No one ever replied, so I suspect these are lost, or maybe not worthwhile for other reasons. Either way, the comment was never addressed.

20.29 2
The City should consider retreating to let natural erosion occur between the lighthouse and Columbia apartments. This would help dissipate some of the wave energy action on lighthouse point.

I do not have a strong opinion on the outcome, but I am pretty certain this process did not review enough good ideas, and did not appreciably incorporate feedback during the public meetings.

The City should not spend any money until it further explores how best to spend it.

In the meantime, the City needs to get a handle on the surface runoff that is compromising the integrity of the bluffs. Funds should be appropriated to parks or public works, whoever manages the bluff top.

Erosion from surface runoff given these coastal dynamics is just unacceptable and easy to fix.

The City needs to immediately address the surface runoff issues which is the primary source of erosion in several spots on westcliff. This is a jurisdictional problem with public works pointing fingers at parks and rec, and vice versa on whose problem it is. This issue is something City Council seems in a good position to resolve.

Thank you for your consideration,
Dustin Mulvaney
116 Harvard St.

20.30 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Lee Taiz <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 9:08 AM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff
One way West Cliff will be very bad for neighbors who live near West Cliff. People who don’t live nearby might like it, or at least tolerate it, but local neighbors will suffer. Please do not implement the two-year one way pilot plan.

Lee Taiz
328 Oxford Way
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

20.31 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Lincoln Taiz <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 10:45 AM
To: City Council
Subject: RESTORE Two-Way Traffic on West Cliff!
I am shocked to learn that the city is actually considering diverting the full flow of West Cliff traffic, which is frequently horrendous--especially in the summer, into adjoining neighborhood streets (Oxford Way, Alta, and Plateau), in order to satisfy certain parties with obvious vested interests in converting our once freely accessible bidirectional coastal corridor into an awkward and inconvenient one-way street and bike path. This is being done in a very undemocratic fashion, with minimal consultation and communication with the people most likely to be affected, the people who live there. Council members should have been holding neighborhood meetings in order to get feedback at earlier stages of this plan, so we could have voiced our concerns about the huge negative impacts, including automobile or motorcycle accidents invo;ving children and pedestrians, that are likely to result should the plan be adopted. Up until now I had been assuming, based on official signage posted on West Cliff, that the plan was to restore two-way traffic. Now, without warning, and without insufficient lead time to mount a protest, you are springing this on us, as if you were trying to minimize any obstacles to implementation.

Don't sell out our neighborhood in order to placate the vested interests of people who don't even live here.

Sincerely,
Lincoln Taiz

20.32 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Elliott Campbell <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 10:48 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Support for two-way bike lanes
Dear Santa Cruz Councilmembers,
I am writing to express my highest support for two-way protected bike lanes on West Cliff (item 20 on agenda to adopt 50yr Vision for West Cliff).

My children bike on West Cliff and my elderly mom walks there. I am worried for both of their safety and urge you to consider making a safe space for pedestrian, bikes, and cars to be separated.

I believe your two-bike lane design will transform West Cliff into a nationally renowned recreation and transport corridor.

Thank you for your consideration.
best,
Elliott Campbell

20.33 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Linda Werner <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 10:53 AM
To: City Council
Subject: I support separate lanes for biking, walking, and vehicles on West Cliff Drive. Please join me in your support.

Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
I support separate lanes for biking, walking, and vehicles on West Cliff Drive. Please join me in your support. Please approve the staff recommendation for agenda Item 20 and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff. Please direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes to determine the feasibility and desirability of this decision.

I drive on West Cliff with out-of-town guests to show them the beauty of our coastline. For those who enjoy walking, we typically will forgo the car and walk. Unfortunately, the current situation does not allow people walking and biking to safely and comfortably enjoy West Cliff Drive. Conflicts between people walking, biking, and driving are common.

A pilot of one-way traffic for cars, a two-way bike lanek, and a separate pedestrian walkway on West Cliff would provide dedicated space for everyone on West Cliff, and allow us to collect data on traffic patterns and community feedback. A one-year pilot of this suggested plan for West Cliff is the best way to see how this would work in practice and allow us to make informed decisions about how to move forward and to do it as a community. An added benefit of this design is that it allows us to be more flexible in responding to future climate impacts to our coast.

I love biking on West Cliff Drive. I bicycle on West Cliff in the vehicle lanes because I'm a fast rider, wear a rear-view mirror on my helmet, and since retirement I ride along the ocean about three days every week. Increasing space for walking and biking is very important to me. Creating safe, welcoming spaces for walking and biking helps the City achieve our climate action goals and makes West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

Please adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Linda Werner

20.34 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Jonathan Kaufman Scher <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 10:56 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

West Cliff Drive is so much more than a way to get from point A to point B - it is a destination for people from across our city, region, and world to enjoy our beautiful coastline. The current configuration does not allow people walking and biking to safely and comfortably enjoy West Cliff Drive, and conflicts between people walking, biking, and driving are common.

A pilot of one-way traffic for cars and a two-way bike lane on West Cliff would provide dedicated space for everyone on West Cliff, and allow us to collect data on traffic patterns and community feedback. A pilot is the best way to see how this would work in practice and allow us to make informed decisions as a community on how to move forward. This design also allows us to be more flexible in responding to future climate impacts to our coast.

I love walking and biking on West Cliff Drive because…. and increasing space for walking and biking is very important to me. Creating safe, welcoming spaces for walking and biking helps the City achieve our climate action goals and makes West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Jonathan Scher
(sent from my phone)

20.35 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: lisa ortiz <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 10:59 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Please support access for all on West Cliff
Marvelous City Council!
I am a neighbor on West Cliff— I live on Laguna Street at the corner of Pelton, behind Lighthouse Field, what a great neighborhood!— and I support one way car traffic and two-way bike and pedestrian lanes on West Cliff.

Even though my street may be more congested? Yes!
Why? Because my city is a progressive, pro-child, pro-family, pro-everybody city, and we know how to build safe, happy communities! Also: check out East Cliff! It’s way better than than it was back in the day!
I want my kids and grand kids to be able to walk and bike safely on West Cliff. The town is growing whether we like it or not, and we need to make room for everyone in the next decades. Climate change is changing our coast whether we want to accept that fact or not, and a big part of facing climate change is building resilient communities. Let’s do it!
Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Lisa Allen Orti
“Someone reading a book is the sign of order in the world.” —Mary Ruefle www.lisaallenortiz.com

20.36 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Nairi Azaryan <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 11:01 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Increasing space for walking and biking is very important to me. Creating safe, welcoming spaces for walking and biking helps the City achieve our climate action goals and makes West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Nairi

20.37 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Steve Lustgarden <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 11:03 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20: Please support more space for walking and cycling on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

This design also allows us to be more flexible in responding to future climate impacts to our coast.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Steve Lustgarden, Santa Cruz

20.38 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 11:15 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Support West Cliff Pilot
Dear Council Member, It would be lovely for people to be able to walk on West Cliff without fear of collisions with bicyclists. This is all the more urgent with the prevalence of electric bikes. Please support the pilot program for separating bicyclists and pedestrians. Thank you,

20.39 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Nita nita <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 11:48 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Support West Cliff Pilot
Dear Council Member,
It would be lovely for people to be able to walk on West Cliff without fear of collisions with bicyclists. This is all the more urgent with the prevalence of electric bikes. Please support the pilot program for separating bicyclists and pedestrians.
and make West Cliff Drive one way, one lane.

Thank you,
Nita Hertel

20.40 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Dana Bagshaw <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 11:23 AM
To: City Council
Subject: We support West Cliff Pilot
Dear Council Member, We would love for people to be able to walk on West Cliff without fear of collisions with bicyclists, and for us as we're cycling to not constantly worry about hitting them. This is all the more urgent with the prevalence of electric bikes. Please support the pilot program for separating bicyclists and pedestrians. Thank you, Clive and Dana Bagshaw

20.41 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Corrina Dilloughery <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 12:08 PM
To: City Council; Fred Keeley; Renee Golder; Sandy Brown; Sonja Brunner; Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson; Scott Newsome; Martine Watkins
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 50-year Vision: Preserving Two-Way Traffic on West Cliff Drive Dear City Council Members,
As a lifelong resident of Santa Cruz County, I am deeply invested in the future of our area, particularly West Cliff Drive. I believe maintaining two-way traffic on this route is crucial for access, convenience, and support for diverse needs, including those with mobility challenges.

A shift to a one-way system will significantly alter traffic patterns leading to congestion in surrounding neighborhoods. West Cliff Drive serves multiple functions - a scenic route, a pathway for walkers and cyclists, and a destination in itself. It's essential to preserve this multipurpose nature without causing unnecessary disruption in our community.

Therefore, I advocate for a plan that retains two-way traffic on West Cliff Drive, supporting access and mobility for all, while minimizing community impact. Prioritizing pedestrian and cycling lanes is commendable, but balance is key. Strategic adjustments to problematic parking areas and pedestrian paths can provide a solution that caters to everyone's needs.

In striving for a sustainable future for West Cliff Drive, I trust the Council will consider these aspects.

Regular ongoing maintenance of the route should also be a priority. I am confident that a solution can be reached that reflects the best interests of our community.

Thank you for considering my viewpoint.

Sincerely,
Corrina Dilloughery
W/S Santa Cruz Homeowner/Taxpayer

20.42 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Richard Marlais <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 12:02 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support West Cliff Pilot
Dear Council Member, It would be lovely for people to be able to walk on West Cliff without fear of collisions with bicyclists. This is all the more urgent with the prevalence of electric bikes. Please support the pilot program for separating bicyclists and pedestrians.

Thank you,
Richard Marlais

20.43 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Andrea Ratto <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 12:16 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support West Cliff Pilot
Dear Council Member,
It would be lovely for people to be able to walk on West Cliff without fear of collisions with bicyclists. This is all the more urgent with the prevalence of electric bikes. Please support the pilot program for separating bicyclists and pedestrians.

Thank you,
Please prioritize the pedestrians as bikers can ride on all the streets and this would be an opportunity for the majority of us to enjoy this walking path without getting run over by bicyclists Sent from my iPhone

20.44 April 3, 2024
The Seymour Marine Discovery Center at UC Santa Cruz urges the Council to approve the 50-year Community Vision for West Cliff.

Seymour Marine Discovery Center is dedicated to educating the public about the role scientific research plays in the understanding and conservation of the ocean and coast. The preparators of the vision leveraged science and community-driven input to formulate the vision. As such, we particularly support the following components:
● Beauty, Resilience, and Continued Uses
“The City is committed to exploring and developing additional management options for West Cliff to lessen the impacts of erosion, such as living shorelines or nature-based solutions, limited engineered natural feature restoration.” ● Limited Hard Armoring
“The City can conserve the natural cliff-ocean interface which allows for some sand from natural erosion to replenish beaches. Hard armoring to preserve access does have consequences as it results in less sand from the cliffs moving to pocket beaches because there is a barrier between the natural coastline and the ocean.” ● Exploring Nature-based Solutions and Engineered Natural Feature Restoration “the City will explore nature-based solutions and engineered natural feature restoration management strategies. These strategies can have benefits like retaining sand (reducing beach erosion) and protecting the cliffs by reducing the strength of waves impacting the coastline.”
The plan is designed to be adaptive and dynamic, which inherently demands regular review and iteration. We concur with other proponents that the Council codifies a frequent revisiting of the plan using the same community-engaged approach that was used to formulate this first step.

We are committed to partnering with the city to continue sharing this story with our community in the decades to come.

Sincerely,
Jonathan Hicken
Executive Director
Seymour Marine Discovery Center | UC Santa Cruz

20.45 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Pauline Seales <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 12:21 PM
To: City Council; SC CAN discussion; Tiffany Wise-West; Claire Gallogly Subject: West Cliff Future
I'm writing on behalf of Santa Cruz Climate Action Network - over 1800 local members.

Having read the full report we endorse the community supported one way for cars with separate bike and pedestrian paths.

For the neighborhoods which are concerned about more traffic we suggest establishing Low Traffic Neighborhoods (LTNs) which can be done quite inexpensively with bollards, planters etc and community group inputs.

Pauline Seales
Santa Cruz Climate Action network

20.46 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Tara Leonard <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 12:24 PM
To: City Council
Subject: I support the 50-year vision for Westcliff
Dear Council Members,
Please approve staff recommendations for Item 20 on your April 9th agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for Westcliff and apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes and one-way car traffic. To put it simply, we cannot continue to cede our public spaces to automobiles and their drivers at the cost of every other user! Safe, welcoming spaces for walking and cycling encourage exercise, help us to achieve the city’s climate action goals, and make West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

It would be fiscally irresponsible to ignore the ongoing impacts from climate change and simply rebuild this coveted stretch of roadway as it previously existed. Now is the time to not just build back, but build forward. Please do not miss the opportunity to make West Cliff a model of shared public space that prioritizes humans, not cars.

Thank you,
Tara Leonard, Westside Resident

20.47 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Tiffany Wise-West
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 10:17 AM
To: Laura Schmidt
Cc: Erika Smart
Subject: Fw: LTE: Support for City's 50-Year Community Vision for West Cliff FYI

Tiffany Wise-West, PE, PhD (she, her)
Sustainability + Resiliency Officer
City of Santa Cruz | City Manager’s Office
809 Center St., Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Phone: 831-420-5433
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.cityofsantacruz.com

From: Rachel Kippen <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 10:00 AM
To: Editorial Santacruzsentinel <[email protected]> Subject: LTE: Support for City's 50-Year Community Vision for West Cliff

Greetings,
Please find my letter to the editor below. Thank you!
Rachel Kippen
808-721-1136
1140 Callas Lane Unit 1, Capitola 95010
Letter Subject: Support for City's 50-Year Community Vision for West Cliff Letter Text: While I'll never have a beach front home address, having access to West Cliff has made me rich beyond my bank account. Santa Cruz's proposed 50-Year Community Vision for West Cliff is a testament to City staff's thoughtful, strategic, and inclusive efforts to preserve West Cliff for the community's greatest good while adapting to a rising sea and increasing storms. The vision is wise in an economic sense - business as usual with storm damage repair quickly tallies into the tens of millions.

Changing West Cliff to one-way, separating bike and pedestrian lanes, and utilizing nature-based solutions to decrease issues caused by hard armoring ensures that our community can access the coast in an improved fashion while still providing homeowner access. It also creates room to retreat and adapt.

Rather than fighting with nature, it works with it.

20.48 2
Band-aids can no longer be used in the place of surgery. This vision is transformative, equity-oriented, and gives me hope that West Cliff will continue to be a gathering place for Santa Cruz's public for decades to come.
--
Rachel Kippen
she/her/hers
Ocean Educator/Sustainability Advocate/Nonprofit Professional Columnist: Our Ocean Backyard
@singleuseplanet

20.49 March 8, 2024
To Santa Cruz City Council,
As a long-standing, local marine conservation nonprofit, Save Our Shores is committed to fostering thriving and sustainable ecosystems in the Monterey Bay and surrounding habitats through equitable environmental action.

Due to accelerated coastal changes we are experiencing in our communities, we are in support of a dynamic and adaptive management approach that the City of Santa Cruz is proposing in their 50-year Community Vision for West Cliff – with the emphasis on the timeline. The timeline needs to remain proactive and shortened as much as possible to ensure solutions do not become obsolete or are less effective due to delay in implementation. We strongly suggest the 50-year plan should be revisited and update the adaptation strategy and LCP at least every ten years or more frequently as may be required by changing conditions.

Save Our Shores is in support of this new plan that will work to implement nature-based restoration and solutions to be prioritized over hard armoring solutions, when feasible, to ensure our coastal ecosystems are considered. We suggest that the definition of living shorelines be clarified for the community and that the types of interventions tried, like sand replenishment, be more clearly identified for transparency.

Save Our shores vision is a resilient coastline uplifted by the responsible action of an engaged network of communities. This includes ensuring that areas of the coast that are accessible to all community members; areas remain clean, safe, thriving ecologically. We highly encourage and support adaptation strategies that maintain and protect this delicate balance between all these variables, while simultaneously considering the rights of private property owners and necessary public functions. Save Our Shores is committed to remain engaged, as plans for the vision solidify – we look forward to seeing the formation and execution of equitable plans, that ensure all community members are considered and that clearly outline who benefits from each of the options proposed.

We also support the optimization of pedestrian and bicycle use, reduction to one-way car traffic, and assurance that the beach access remains open and accessible for community members and visitors, alike. We appreciate this community-centric approach to address the enviable coastal changes that are occurring and ensures that West Cliff can be enjoyed by generations to come.

Sincerely,
Erica Donnelly-Greenan, M.Sc, Save Our Shores Executive Director

20.50 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Rick Longinotti <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 12:30 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support West Cliff Pilot
Dear Council Member,
It would be lovely for people to be able to walk on West Cliff without fear of collisions with bicyclists. This is all the more urgent with the prevalence of electric bikes. Please support the pilot program for separating bicyclists and pedestrians.

Thank you,
Rick
Rick Longinotti, MFT
https://ricklonginotti.com/
My book is available to order:

That Loving Feeling: A Couples Guide to Transform Hurt & Criticism into Kindness & Gratitude
at your local independent bookstore,
Amazon or GroktheWorld

20.51 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Roland Saher <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 12:41 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support West Cliff Pilot
Dear Council Member,
It would be lovely for people to be able to walk on West Cliff without fear of collisions with bicyclists. This is all the more urgent with the prevalence of electric bikes. Please support the pilot program for separating bicyclists and pedestrians.

Thank you,
Roland Saher

20.52 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Paul Hempstead <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 12:48 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support for one-way vehicle traffic on West Cliff Drive Hello City Council,
As a longtime Santa Cruz resident I would like to voice my support for the one direction car lane and two direction bike lane proposal. A single direction of car traffic works great on East Cliff Dr, I see no reason why it would be inadequate for the west side.

More importantly, this would increase coastal resiliency long term by decreasing motor vehicle reliance on West Cliff as a transportation thoroughfare. When coastal erosion or storms close down West Cliff drive in the future, it will be much less disruptive to everyone (motorists, neighbors, etc.) if alternative routes on the west side are already established. Keeping drivers dependent on West Cliff two-way as a major transportation corridor will only make that future disruption more severe.

Change isn't always easy, but I think it's clear this is the best long term compromise for the city.

Respectfully,
Paul Hempstead

20.53 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: David Zweig <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 1:08 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff
I support one way vehicle flow on West Cliff to allow for pedestrian AND bike lanes.

20.54 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Martha Graham Waldon <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 1:09 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Subject line: Item 20: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,

Martha Graham-Waldon

20.55 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: jfbergs <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 2:06 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Westcliff 50 year vision
Subject line: Item 20: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Joel Steinberg, MD

20.56 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: JRE <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 2:15 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Please Implement the West Cliff Bike Path Pilot Dear Council Members,
I would like to be able to ride my bike on Westcliff without the worry of being hit by a car or the worry and difficulty of navigation around and between pedestrians, children, strollers dogs, etc. I usually ride in the street, not the path, to give pedestrians that space.

But it's also stressful to be sharing space with cars. This is why most cyclists use the sidewalk path.

Please support the pilot program for creating a dedicated separated and protected 2-way bike path next to the sidewalk, to separate bicyclists from both vehicles and and pedestrians.

The multi-use path works very well on the rail trail, which is mostly used as a transportation route. It doesn't work as well on Westcliff, which is a scenic destination. Wescliff is really just a victim of its own success: since it's such a lovely facility it is oversubscribed. I hope you will support the pilot program to expand active transportation on Westcliff.

This is what we want, right? For more people to get out of their cars. So let's give people the space to do that.

Thank you, Jessica

20.57 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Teresa Fukuda <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 2:18 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
As a lower Westside resident, I request that you please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

I love walking and biking on West Cliff Drive. It's a great motivator for me to get off the couch, enjoy the beauty that Santa Cruz has to offer, and to get away from so many cars on other streets. Increasing space for walking and biking is very important to me. Creating safe, welcoming spaces for walking and biking helps the City achieve our climate action goals and makes West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Teresa Fukuda

20.58 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: James Reichmuth <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 2:33 PM
To: City Council
Subject: I support West Cliff Dr. Transportation Pilot
Dear City Council,
I support the proposed resolution authorizing and directing staff to apply for, accept, and appropriate grant funds for a West Cliff Dr. pilot (Pilot) to test and explore a transportation option that includes one-way vehicle access with dedicated bike and pedestrian lanes and neighborhood traffic calming. • Community outreach has been extensive.
• Traffic calming and mitigation that truly works for all affected Lower West Side neighbors can only be determined if West Cliff is operated as One-Way for enough time to gather data on which to guide the traffic calming/mitigation.
• While this is a change from the Sep 2023 Newsletter that indicated West Cliff Dr. would be reopened as Two-Way traffic, since global warming will likely force One-Way or No-Way traffic at some point within the 50 year plan window we, at a minimum, should be prepared for this inevitability so we can so we can plan effectively. Furthermore, a dedicated pedestrian/bike lane between the cliff and One-Way thoroughfare will provide a buffer that will keep West Cliff Dr. open to allow uninterrupted passage for City services and first responder, and more time to figure out the most effective means to effect repairs when further damage occurs. • Since a significant section of West Cliff Dr. has been closed or One-Way for 15 months already, now is the best time to move forward with the proposed Pilot as it will be the least change from its current state, and therefore be of minimum impact to Lower West Side neighbors and all users.
• I applaud the City for taking action to approve the Pilot resolution sooner than later. Since a majority of responding stakeholders are in favor of One-Way traffic on West Cliff Dr., there is no reason to delay the proposed Pilot.

20.59 2
• While the City has done its best to get input from all stakeholders, and done so over an extended period of time, One-Way (any change, for that matter) will not please all constituents. But referring to my first bullet point above, undertaking the Pilot to find a real-world One-Way traffic plan that works best for all, is the only way to derive the best solution should the Pilot ultimately recommend changing permanently to One-Way.
• Finally, the City has rebuilt West Cliff Dr. to its original Two-Way configuration to obtain matching Federal Funds for the repairs. This is the closest, easiest configuration from which to launch the proposed Pilot, and to change West Cliff Dr. to permanent One-Way traffic should the Pilot recommend that.

Thank you for your consideration of the above, and for what I hope will be your approval of the proposed Pilot resolution.

Sincerely & Regards,
James Reichmuth
944 West Cliff Drive
Mobile: 408.234.1321
[email protected]

20.60 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Roland Saher <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 4:01 PM
To: City Council
Subject: walk & bike on West cliff
Dear mayor and council members, I strongly urge you to pass legislation to make Westcliff Drive the most walkable and bicycle friendly space in our town. Help people to get out of their cars! A pilot one-way driveway and a two-way bike lane next to a walkway for pedestrians is my ideal plan.

Roland Saher

20.61 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Kathy Haber <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 4:15 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support West Cliff Pilot
Dear Council Member,
It would be lovely for people to be able to walk on West Cliff without fear of collisions with bicyclists. This is all the more urgent with the prevalence of electric bikes. Please support the pilot program for separating bicyclists and pedestrians.

Thank you,
Kathy Haber

20.62 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Philip Boutelle <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 4:15 PM
To: City Council
Subject: 20: West Cliff 50-Year Vision
Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please move forward with the staff recommendation to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff Drive, and direct staff to apply for funding for a pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Based on previous Council direction, Public Works staff has taken a slow and measured approach to this effort. This is a great time to acknowledge their great work, by following their recommendation to adopt the Vision plan.

The traffic calming pilot is a great step as well. During the storm damage closures, the pilot closures were limited by Council in scope, so the results were underwhelming. The whole neighborhood will be affected, and this traffic calming plan will be able to address everything. And as a CalTrans ATP Quick Build project, there is room to iterate on the design.

Thank you again for supporting this process and moving this forward by adopting the Vision and applying for funds for the pilot program.
-Phil Boutelle
Santa Cruz

20.63 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Bruce Dau <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 4:28 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

This design also allows us to be more flexible in responding to future climate impacts to our coast.

I love walking and biking on West Cliff Drive because it reminds me of why I love living here. Creating safe, welcoming spaces for walking and biking helps the City achieve our climate action goals and makes West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Bruce Dau

20.64 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Rachel Kippen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2024 10:07 AM
To: City Council; Fred Keeley; Renee Golder; Sandy Brown; Martine Watkins; Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson; Scott Newsome; Sonja Brunner
Subject: Gratitude and Request to Approve 50-Year Community Vision for West Cliff Greetings Mayor Keeley, Vice Mayor Golder, and honorable council members Watkins, Brown, Brunner, Newsome, and Kalantari-Johnson,
My name is Rachel Kippen and I am writing to you in support of the 50-Year Community Vision for West Cliff.

I have been a resident of Santa Cruz County for nearly 12 years, the majority of my time as a renter on the City's west side. West Cliff has been a fixture in my personal life. It has allowed me access to the activities I hold most dearly, the reason that I spend the majority of my income on rent: tide pooling, birding, coastal stairs for paddle boarding in kelp forests that hug the coast, exercise in the form of walking the pedestrian path and biking - for many years West Cliff was part of my daily walking commute to work before I could afford my own car. When I first moved to this town I would go to West Cliff and congratulate myself by sitting on a bench and staring out at Monterey Bay - I made it here, what more could one want? While I'll never have a beach front home address, having access to West Cliff has made me rich beyond my bank account. One of my first dates with my now husband was sitting on a concrete slab on West Cliff and watching cormorants. Everyone I know has special memories like mine.

I have known West Cliff's challenges, too. I have personally cleaned out its caves of hypodermic needles and hazardous wastes. At the time, these issues were divisive. I remember the viral videos made by surfers about the caves and those experiencing addiction and homelessness, I remember the insults and the rage-filled town halls. There was a lot of valuable time wasted by pointing fingers and not simply acknowledging the reality of the moment, and taking action to help.

Most recently, I have watched parts of West Cliff crumble into the ocean. I have seen some similar pointing of fingers, some similar lack of acknowledgement of reality. West Cliff is changing because the climate is changing. This is an undeniable fact.

The proposed 50 year vision is a testament to City staff's thoughtful, strategic, and inclusive efforts to preserve West Cliff for the community's greatest good while adapting to a rising sea and increasing storms. The vision is wise in an economic sense - business as usual with storm damage repair quickly tallies into the tens of millions. Changing West Cliff to one-way, separating bike and pedestrian lanes, and utilizing nature-based solutions to decrease issues caused by hard armoring ensures that our community can access the coast in an improved fashion, that homeowners may still access their residences - it also creates room to retreat and adapt. Rather than fighting with nature, it works with it.

Band aids can no longer be used in the place of surgery. This vision is transformative, equity-oriented, and gives me hope that West Cliff will continue to be a gathering place for Santa Cruz's public for decades to come.

20.65 2
Kudos to the City's Sustainability and Climate team and your City Manager's office for creating this comprehensive strategy. I encourage you to approve the 50-Year West Cliff Vision at your next council meeting.

Thank you for your consideration.

Kindly,
Rachel Kippen
--
Rachel Kippen
she/her/hers
Ocean Educator/Sustainability Advocate/Nonprofit Professional Columnist: Our Ocean Backyard
@singleuseplanet

20.66 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Mike Dilloughery <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 7:57 AM
To: City Council; Fred Keeley; Renee Golder; Sandy Brown; Sonja Brunner; Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson; Scott Newsome; Martine Watkins; Cc:

Subject: 50-year Vision: Preserving Two-Way Traffic on West Cliff Drive Dear City Council Members,
As a lifelong resident of Santa Cruz Westside, I am deeply invested in the future of our area, particularly West Cliff Drive. I believe maintaining two-way traffic on this route is crucial for access, convenience, and support for diverse needs, including those with mobility challenges.

As a passionate life long surfer who frequents, daily, the waves accessed by West Cliff Drive I am deeply invested in maintaining 2-way vehicle access to this vital route. West Cliff Drive not only provides crucial access to some of the best surfing spots but also fosters a sense of community among fellow local and visiting surfers. Preserving 2-way access to this road is not just about convenience; it's about preserving a way of life and the connection that surfing brings.

A shift to a one-way system will significantly alter traffic patterns leading to congestion in surrounding neighborhoods, more time spent in vehicle traffic, repetitive circles hunting for the already slim parking spots. West Cliff Drive serves multiple functions - a scenic vehicle route, a pathway for walkers and cyclists, and the gateway to Santa Cruz surfing. It's essential to preserve this multipurpose nature without causing unnecessary disruption in our community.

Therefore, I advocate for a plan that retains two-way traffic on West Cliff Drive, supporting access and mobility for all, while minimizing community impact. Strategic adjustments to problematic parking areas and pedestrian paths can provide a solution that caters to everyone's needs.

In striving for a sustainable future for West Cliff Drive, I trust the Council will consider these aspects.

Regular ongoing maintenance of the route should also be a priority. I am confident that a solution can be reached that reflects the best interests of our community.

Thank you for considering my viewpoint. I await the Council's decision optimistically.

Sincerely,
Mike Dilloughery

20.67 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Natasha Flechsig <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 5:38 PM
To: City Council
Subject: One-way Westcliff
No!
1) You are jerking residents around by changing the 50-year plan on very short notice. 2) There has been little to no outreach with lower Westside residents. 3) There hasn’t been a traffic and parking plan presented to lower Westside residents. 4) You promised to reopen Westcliff to 2-way traffic.
5) The loudest voice advocating for one-way is the biking coalition. They are not going to be adversely affected the way local residents will be.
6) Pelton, for instance has become very unsafe for pedestrians, cyclists, dog-walkers and children because of speeding traffic. It used to be a quiet street.

Please stop jerking around from one plan to another without considering all the implications.

Natasha Flechsig

20.68 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Garrett <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 6:06 PM
To: City Council
Subject: 4.9.24 Agenda Item # 20 West Cliff 50 year vision

4.9.24 Agenda Item # 20 West Cliff 50 year vision
Dear Council,
This is worth another letter.

I was wondering why the city is so determined to go with one-way on West Cliff to the extent of spending a ton of money to hire mass persuasion consultants to convince the public it is all their idea.

It isn't. It's yours.

I toyed with the idea maybe it was a diversion from the real reasons. Maybe the allure of huge grants to do development to put the city workers to work and create a bigger government is the real reason. Certainly that seems to be the motivation for almost everything the city does. More money for, and then a bigger government.

It could also be a diversion from the essential main issue is "WHAT is the city going to do about erosion and protecting the coast against loss of private property and public property" using a diversion of attention to a "one-way", less cars idea. Certainly the focus of the resolution is that. I see nothing about protecting West Cliff at this meeting from loss of coast. The reason .. cost. Anything that costs money the city has to come up with that isn't "free money" grants (no matter the strings attached) is LESS FOR THEM, and is to be avoided, no matter what the people want or need.

There is also the non-stop incessant "let's get rid of cars" mantra of the climate change as existential threat globalist nonsense. Yeah , maybe that garbage.

I would remind you that most of this is not about safety, not about health, it's about selfishness with total disregard for what this country stands for.

Cars represent freedom to travel. You don't care abut that.

Right now, anyone can travel in any direction, representing individual liberty and freedom. You don't care about that.

Right now, Peds share the trail with bikes, Bikes share that and the road with cars, cars share the road with both.

There are a LOT of selfish people who don't want to share, and would prefer taking individual liberties away from some people (cars), so they can have MORE room for themselves, or Peds who don't want to share the trail with anyone, and have no problem depriving others of freedom to travel by their means.

20.69 2
I don't really care a hoot what happens on East Cliff. They shouldn't care all that much what happens on West Cliff. Your surveys don't respect usage is heavily lower West side people, or out of town-ers who don't get a vote (and I'm not sure they deserve one).

Do you think you are fooling anyone for one second? There is ZERO chance you are going to do anything except go forward no matter what the results of any analysis are every 6 months. It hasn't stopped you so far from continuing more and more and more studies to promote the one-way idea, your idea from the very beginning.

I don't suppose the thousands of opposition petition change.org signatures mean anything? Nope, you could care less. I see 2,239 signatures as of this date.

Sign the Petition
To help pr
privacy, M
prevented
download
from the In Sign the Petition
Keep West Cliff Drive open to two-way car traffic!

There are other petitions also with less signatures.

I suspect if we have western direction one-way, all the return traffic will be on Woodrow, Pelton, Almar, and some on Fair, or Swift, and finally natural bridges, but nearly all of it from there will be on Delaware and Mission, and some winding through neighborhoods.

The minuscule detour is bad enough. 2.5 mile one-way will make Woodrow and Almar much worse.

If you are going to do this unnecessary coercive change, let's make intersections of Plateau, Alta with both Wood row and Almar 4 say stops. The "calming measures" are a joke.

Garrett Philipp - Plateau lower Westside

20.70 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: David Hartley <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 7:08 PM
To: City Council
Cc: David Hartley
Subject: West Cliff Drive: 50-Year Vision Document feedback Hello
As a resident of the lower Westside and who has been subjected to huge volumes of diverted traffic though Pelton Ave, I was dismayed to hear that the City Council have added a two year pilot program for one way traffic. This completely goes against what was promised to West side residents by the City Council 9/12/23 newsletter.

We were promised that West Cliff drive would be restored to two way traffic after the repairs were made.

In addition, the City Council opted not to do any of the traffic mitigation promised to Pelton Ave as West Cliff was going to be restored to two way traffic.

Pelton Ave and the surrounding roads have been subjected to huge traffic volumes. This has made the road unsafe to walk and cycle on. Previously it was very safe.

Why is the City Council pushing for such a quick move to single lane traffic? From our attendance at meetings, it is obvious that the Bike Coalition has attended in large numbers to promote their agenda. Why is the City Council not getting the true feeling of residents, tax payers and voters of the entire lower West Side on this matter? Shouldn’t we have more of a voice than the Bike Coalition? Note that I am also a cyclist, but the bike coalition agenda will not make it safer for cyclists … what about the adjacent roads that will now have substantially more traffic, making it more dangerous for cyclists and pedestrians?
The City council needs to engage the entire lower West Side on this matter. For sure, the majority of residents who have not been affected by the current closures do not know about these plans. They will probably be as mad current residents who have had to endure the traffic over the last year.

What has also been evident for residents that have been affected by the current closures has been the total lack of planing for traffic mitigation in the area. Instead, roads have been blocked ad hoc making matters even worse. Santa Cruz City Council need to do a full investigation of the impacts of these new traffic in this area. They need to work with the residents.

Why does the City Council feel it is necessary to make quick implementations wrt the 50 year plan? It is a FIFTY year plan, not one year plan. You need to do more due diligence before making these decisions.

20.71 2
It feels the entire decision is being rushed. Most people either won’t be able to attend the meeting (as they have to work) or they aren’t aware of it. This is not the right way to be making these decisions.

What we have seen over the last year has been a huge increase of traffic, huge amounts of noise, pollution, and dangerous driving. You are going to push this onto the entire West Side if you go ahead of your actions.

Please do your proper due diligence and involve the entire lower west side community in your decisions.

Thanks
Dr David Hartley
910 Pelton Ave, Santa Cruz
Resident, tax payer, voter.

20.72 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Mary Lynn Simons <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 7:24 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support West Cliff Pilot
Dear Council Member,
It would be lovely for people to be able to walk on West Cliff without fear of collisions with bicyclists. This is all the more urgent with the prevalence of electric bikes. Please support the pilot program for separating bicyclists and pedestrians.

Thank you,

20.73 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Ren Tawil <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 7:46 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support West Cliff Pilot
Dear Council Member,
It would be lovely for people to be able to walk on West Cliff without fear of collisions with bicyclists. This is all the more urgent with the prevalence of electric bikes. Please support the pilot program for separating bicyclists and pedestrians.

Thank you,
Ren Tawil
Santa Cruz
Virus-free.www.avast.com

20.74 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Pamela Stearns Stearns <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 9:07 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support West Cliff Pilot
Dear Council Member,
It would be lovely for people to be able to walk on West Cliff without fear of collisions with bicyclists. This is all the more urgent with the prevalence of electric bikes. Please support the pilot program for separating bicyclists and pedestrians.

Thank you,
Pam Stearns and Family

20.75 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Kitty Hansen <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 9:21 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff Drive
Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

I love walking and biking on West Cliff Drive because it is so vibrant, and so close to the ocean, and increasing space for walking and biking is very important to me. Creating safe, welcoming spaces for walking and biking helps the City achieve our climate action goals and makes West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Kitty Hansen

20.76 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Connie <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 9:52 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support West Cliff Pilot
Dear Council Member,
It would be lovely for people to be able to walk on West Cliff without fear of collisions with bicyclists. This is all the more urgent with the prevalence of electric bikes. Please support the pilot program for separating bicyclists and pedestrians.

Thank you,
Connie Wilson
Sent from my iPhone

20.77 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Aphrodite Mitropoulos <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 7:37 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Best regards,
Aphrodite Mitropoulos
Avid Santa Cruz Cyclist

20.78 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Lee Taiz <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 8:55 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Barriers
Removal of barriers to car traffic soon Oxford and Alta Streets will be a disaster to the people who live on those streets. We’ve already experienced what that’s like. It’s horrible. Please don’t remove traffic barriers on Alta and Oxford!
Remember the traffic jams? Have mercy on the residents here.

Lee Taiz
328 Oxford Way
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

20.79 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Michelle Nicely <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 9:12 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Bike Lane WC
To city council,
West Cliff and any cliffs around the beaches:

Only Bikes and Walking with a soft Running lane, please.

Vibration Alone will cause those homes to be less stable on the cliffs over time. **Also, expect electric power to be out during major natural disasters.

Sincerely,
Michelle and Dan Nicely
Sent from my iPhone

20.80 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Brendan Quirk <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 10:27 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20 - More Space for Walking and Biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
While I’m using the form letter below to express my opinion on the matter, please don’t disregard my passion for this subject. As a citizen of this city, a parent of a young child and a bicycle commuter and enthusiast, I urge you to make west cliff a safe and inviting community space.

Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Get Outlook for iOS

20.81 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Walter Ward <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 11:09 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Keep West Cliff Traffic Flow 2 Way
Dear City Council Members,
The residents of Pelton Ave. were told that the rerounting of traffic off of West Cliff to repair it to a 2-way was only temporary for Pelton Ave. The increased volume of traffic on Pelton since the winter 2023 storms has been a burden and a safety hazard for Pelton residents and other side street residents. The rerouting situation was only bearable on a temporary basis, but in the upcoming City Council meeting you are considering a permanent 1-way on West Cliff causing a permanent use of Pelton as the 2-way main thoroughfare.

Pelton Ave. does not have complete side walks to protect pedestrians. Pelton has terrible rainwater drainage that makes residents walk unsafely into the street and to have rain water sprayed on them from passing cars.

The intersection of Columbia and Pelton is a traffic hazard and the site of numerous accidents since sight clearance is not sufficient.

Entering and exiting driveways has become increasing dangerous with increased traffic flow on Pelton due from West Cliff repair work. Continuing to have Pelton Ave. as a main thoroughfare for West Cliff traffic is unconscionable given its unsafe conditions for those that live on Pelton and neighboring residents crossing or using Pelton Ave.

Myself and senior family members as well as neighbors used to enjoy taking walks using Pelton Ave., but can no longer do so, due to increased traffic and associated safety hazards. We thought our sacrifice was warranted for the greater good when the repair work was being done on West Cliff to restore it to 2-way traffic flow. We were told repeatedly that the situation was temporary and after the West Cliff repair work, it would return to 2-way.

Keep your promise and return West Cliff to 2 way traffic. Keep Pelton a residential street not a thoroughfare for West Cliff traffic!
- Pamela Downing & Candace Ward
816 Pelton Ave.

Santa Cruz, CA 95060

20.82 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Brent Haddad <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 12:23 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support for one car lane West Cliff
I live on the upper west side of Santa Cruz and consider West Cliff Drive to be one of the city’s greatest amenities. Expanding the safe passage of bikers and pedestrians will preserve public access to the drive as coastal processes reduce the width of the drive over time. It will increase opportunities for outdoor exercise and community events in the form of walks and bike rides. And it will reduce the risk of bikepedestrian accidents in light of the growing speed of e-bikes.

Thank you,
Brent Haddad, resident of Santa Cruz
Brent M. Haddad, MBA, Ph.D.

Professor of Environmental Studies
University of California, Santa Cruz

20.83 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Margaret Nelson <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 2:05 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Westcliff
Your proposal to make west cliff one way is a horrible idea for the neighborhoods. You need to survey ,at a minimum the people living in the blocks from Delaware to westcliff. We have had enough of the people parking all over to get to westcliff, racing through our streets when they are ready to leave Westcliff. DO NOT make our lives harder.

Margaret Nelson

20.84 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Robin McDuff <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 2:08 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20 - More Space for Walking and Biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

I have wanted this change for, at least, twenty years! It will make the area nicer, safer and more resilient.

Robin McDuff
210 Miramar Drive
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

20.85 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Robin Cunningham <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 2:10 PM
To: City Council
Subject: STOP until all Lower Westside neighbors have had a say/re West Cliff Please. Until all Lower Westside neighbors have had a chance to weigh in on proposed one way vehicular traffic on West Cliff do not set anything in stone.

Reducing traffic flow in one direction puts insane burdens on formerly calm neighborhood streets. The traffic does not magically disappear. It is a BAD idea and I can attest, as living on one of the streets impacted, that it will cause a severe decrease in the quality of numerous neighborhoods in terms of increased traffic, noise and chaos when all the drivers really want is to see the ocean.

Please do the right thing and make West Cliff a 2 way street. So many things fall into place with this strategy.

Thank you,
Robin Cunningham

20.86 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Katherine Moore <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 2:15 PM
To: City Council
Subject: One way west cliff!
Yes!!!! Totally for it.

Sent from my iPhone

20.87 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Cory <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 2:22 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20 - More Space for Walking and Biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
I'm writing to request that you approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

The current configuration of West Cliff Drive does not allow people walking and biking to safely and comfortably enjoy it, and conflicts between people walking, biking, and driving are common. A pilot of one-way traffic for cars and a two-way bike lane on West Cliff would provide dedicated space for everyone on West Cliff, and allow us to collect data on traffic patterns and community feedback. This design also allows us to be more flexible in responding to future climate impacts to our coast, and reinforces Santa Cruz as a walkable and bikeable city.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Regards,
Cory Matsui

20.88 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Malka Nagel <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 2:35 PM
To: City Council
Subject: One way pilot
Are there not more important issues to deal with !? How much will this cost the city. Why do we need it? There are streets in Santa Cruz which have potholes. Need paving. We have areas that flood when it rains.

We have a homeless issue. Why are we going to spend money on this ? Malka Nagel

20.89 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Henry Hooker <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 3:17 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20 - More Space for Walking and Biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff.

Westcliff will become safer and more enjoyable for all involved, including pedestrians, dogs, bikes, skateboards, even the one way drivers and residents!
Thanks for your consideration.

Henry Hooker
walker, biker, driver

20.90 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Connor Dilloughery <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 1:14 PM
To: City Council; Fred Keeley; Renee Golder; Sandy Brown; Sonja Brunner; Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson; Scott Newsome; Martine Watkins
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 50-year Vision: Preserving Two-Way Traffic on West Cliff Drive Dear City Council Members,
As a lifelong resident of Santa Cruz Westside with a deep connection to West Cliff Drive, I implore you to maintain two-way traffic on this route. This is not just for convenience, but to support diverse needs, including those with mobility challenges.

As a daily surfer and paddler, I can attest to West Cliff Drive’s significance. It provides access to prime surfing spots and fosters community among local and visiting surfers. A shift to a one-way system would disrupt traffic patterns, causing congestion in surrounding neighborhoods and increased time spent in traffic.

West Cliff Drive serves multiple purposes - a scenic vehicle route, a pathway for walkers and cyclists, and a gateway to Santa Cruz surfing. Retaining two-way traffic would preserve this multipurpose nature without causing unnecessary disruption. Therefore, I advocate for strategic adjustments to problematic parking areas and pedestrian paths instead of a one-way system.

Having spent my summers with the Santa Cruz Junior Lifeguard program growing up, I am concerned about the potential stress a one-way system would bring. Two-way traffic allows for better traffic control and assists first responders in reaching potential victims swiftly.

I would also like to question the accuracy of the “public polls” suggestion in favor of a one-way system. These polls only considered a small group, not the Santa Cruz public. As Santa Cruz continues to attract more tourists and residents, especially during the summer months, a one-way system would not be favorable.

I trust that the Council will consider these points while planning for a sustainable future for West Cliff Drive.

Regular maintenance of the route should also be a priority. I am confident that a solution that best serves our community can be found.

I appreciate your consideration. I look forward to the Council’s decision.

Sincerely,
Connor Dilloughery

20.91 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 4:51 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Please don't make West Cliff one way until doing a more full resident survey Dear City Council,
Please don't make West Cliff one way until doing a more full resident survey, and don't to a 2 year trial run first either.

Get more complete input from the neighborhoods that it will effect.

I am very curious - do you really think there are enough bikes that don't already have places to ride in the previous configuration to make it worth this change?
Think about how many cars this will effect in comparison and what that will do to the neighborhoods in this area.

What was wrong with how it was before? It seemed to work pretty well for everyone.

If there was truly no space left for 2 lanes then I would understand a change, but all the pictures show a bike lane plus extra curb that take as much space as the 2 lane system would.

This does not seem like a good idea to me and I don't understand why we would break so many other parts of the traffic pattern to fix something that was not a problem before.

I live in the area and I ride a bike and drive a car through this area and it was fine how it was.

Thank you for your consideration,
David Go

20.92 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Cas Shulman-Mora <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 6:24 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Westcliff one-way pilot program
I am writing to express my outrage that the proposal to begin a pilot program for one-way traffic on Westcliff Dr.

As a resident of Sunset Ave I have been suffering from the current massive increase in traffic on Almar Ave from Westcliff to Delaware and Mission. We have been anxiously awaiting the finalization of the repairs to Westcliff so we can once again have safe and calm traffic in our neighborhood.

While I understand the desire for a widened bike and pedestrian path, moving to one-way traffic on Westcliff with all of the repercussions to neighbors CANNOT be the solution.

Please halt this pilot until ALL neighbors in the affected area have been made aware and had their voices heard.

Sincerely,
Carol Shulman-Mora

20.93 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Gregory Kolar <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 7:08 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Bike path meeting set for Tuesday April 9
The meeting that covers whether west cliff drive should be one lane has not been publicized, and that perhaps that meeting has a vote scheduled to try that one lane situation out for 2 (years!!!) is ludicrous…..I am a resident on Monterey Street and have NOT been informed such an action or discussion to vote is underway…..publicize such activity….and since you did not publicize……you should cancel any vote on any action to try a one lane test on west cliff drive…..you need to publicize and not let some group which is pro.

Bicycle make major city decisions on their own ….thanks for stopping such a takeover by bike interest people in government positions….Greg Kolar

20.94 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Anthony ruffo <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2024 7:32 PM
To: City Council
Subject: westcliff
my name is Anthony Ruffo. I live on 1414 Laurel St., I’m an ex pro surfer and a lifelong resident of Santa Cruz for 60 years. I have a high school education but I am been lucky enough to have traveled around the world through my surfing career.

I’ve had my issues with drug addiction and not being the person I should be in this community and in that moment, I’ve turned my life around and understand that the community wanted more for me and so I Took responsibility of my life and my actions and turn it around. I I work with Operation Surf and the Mauli Ola foundation which are two nonprofits that serve the military community as well as cystic fibrosis community. my friend shane skeleton ,my friend, Darrel virostko and myself starting at surfing club in 2017 called Santa Cruz Board riders. It’s taken off with over 200 active members yearly and it’s been a great club and one of our things besides competing against other cities is also getting involved in doing stuff for the community .we just gave away thousand dollar scholarships within our club to four club members, thousand dollars each towards school as an example .

I’m telling you this just so whomever might be reading this understand who I am because I never get involved with this kind of stuff but this one is hitting the heart of the surfing community, and the residence of area on the west side of Santa Cruz between natural bridges and Bay Street and the negative effective this would do to the neighborhoods and for residence of Santa Cruz as well as visitors who come here. I’d like to say this wholeheartedly and truthfully to you that I’ve gone to these meetings down at lou Nelson, and from day one they had an agenda, and it was clearly visible, missed two meetings because I was out of town but I’ve been there and watched how they operate the Farlon strategy people and surveys they were sending out and how one-sided and direct traction driven they were to get what they wanted, which obvious. there was a lot of people at these meetings, who were against the one-way and wanted a two Lane road like always ,wanted also to make it work for bikes and pedestrians. and it’s all possible so when they say there’s not enough room , thats not true!! we’ve gone and looked and there’s plenty of room. We’ve measured with measuring tapes and have done our own homework !!and the vision that their goin to say and their draft is going to charts, graphs, and opinions that are not correct at all ! I was in shock with some of the stuff that they were saying and misconceptions they were showing ?it was just mind-boggling to me, and even after people spoke up like myself, we weren’t heard. They just didn’t care or it seemed like they didn’t care at these meetings ?using the closure to push an agenda which now I’ve been finding out doing some homework that’s been on the table for a while ..,is not cool at all to make up stuff which they have and honestly not informing the neighborhoods that will affected by this is mind-boggling. The people those neighborhoods have no idea when talking to a lot of them that this was even on the table they thought Westcliff was going to be fixed and it would have It’s two lanes like it’s always had and maybe repairing and making bike path bigger or the walk path or doing something like that they had no idea that this one-way thing was gonna go down. And they were upset over the fact that they do not want the traffic and more street closures in their neighborhood and rerouting and roundabouts and etc. etc. it’s just a ridiculous proposal people use that not only to enjoy the scenery but also to go up and down to get downtown people who live on the west side it’s part of the daily life .It’s crazy to think other than that there’s been no traffic survey at all about this proposal at all zero !!
they tell you who uses the Cliff more and they say pedestrians it is not true at all. It’s the biggest misconception? as a matter fact cars use Westcliff a lot and not only that in the cars there’s multiple

20.95 2
passengers, multiple people and a lot of the cars so if you were to count the people in the cars and just the cars they out number bike and walking tremendously but they’ll tell you otherwise. We’ve even challenged them to come down stand look ..There are different times different days and do some counting and they never showed Bob Pearson will tell you that you could go down there and just stand in Westcliff and count the cars even with the cliff closed the people or the bikes and you’ll see what is used more by cars and to have a lane taken away for bikes that are hardly even there , it’s crazy the worst idea I I’ve watched reroute Westcliff Drive in the 80s near its beach twice but every time they got West cliffe up and running for everybody to enjoy!
inclusion is the big word here
inclusion means including everybody and not taking something away. That is important driving east on Westcliff Drive is one of the best views you could have not going north. People use it for wellness ,elderly and physically challenged people who can’t walk or ride a bike. in their car just to see the view, people who are going through bad days you hear story after story and how West cliff changes their attitude and being able to drive up and down it is a big deal residence on the west side again use it to downtown.downtown. I don’t think this was thought out at all. I think there’s an agenda being pushed by a certain group of people and it’s not cool.. I never thought I would have to be fighting for access to Westcliff Drive freedom to drive my dog and my surfboards down to the lane whatever direction I wanna come from ,that’s in jeopardy because they want to have a few bikes and have their own bike. Lane ?doesn’t make sense to me. I think we all can coexist together walking biking and driving. It’s not a big deal it all work with a little engineering and fixing and putting some love back into Westcliff that has been neglected for at least 20 years and we all can get what we want out of it. Total access for everybody !!!it’s one of the iconic jewels of this town. With all the change going on, and all the buildings and all that stuff ,we do not want to turn our town into a one-way city which is happening everywhere. Please consider these thoughts and I’m hoping you will consider not to approve the one-way grant proposal please thank you.

Give it time and let’s work this out and make this work for everybody. There’s no reason why It can’t. Thank you.

Sent from my iPhone

20.96 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Marion Shonick <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 3:35 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Public Input on Agenda Item #20 on the April 9 City Council Meeting • There has been no direct outreach to the neighborhoods adjacent to West Cliff Drive regarding this proposal. The majority of residents found out about the proposed one-way pilot program after the Council agenda packet was posted. These are the very people who will be the most impacted by changing traffic conditions on the lower westside. We are asking that City Council postpone the decision on a one-way pilot program and direct staff to conduct a robust outreach program to impacted neighborhoods prior to moving forward on profound changes to West Cliff Drive.

Sincerely, Marion & Jeremy Shonick, 222 Sunset Ave., Santa Cruz, CA 95060

20.97 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Cristina Lupano <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 6:48 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Supporting TWO LANES on Westcliff drive
To Santa Cruz City Counsel,
Unfortunately the study that was done by the city to collect the community opinions on one way or two ways for Westcliff was not transparent.

Specifically, the page that listed a selection of elements for a future vision, should have included a Two Lanes checkbox and allow the user to explore a new and improved set up that maintains the current elements.

Instead the questionnaire only allowed for a one way selection and forced the user to a one way scenario if choosing to include a bike lane and walking path.

Regardless of the study results which was costly and disappointing given the lack of clarity, I believe that Westcliff should remain two lanes and we should improve the current set up. With some adjustments to the current setup, we can carve out space for cars, bicycles and pedestrians. Some of the planting, green areas, and parking areas can be reduced to widen the road to accommodate a designated bike lane and an improved the walking path on the current two lanes setup.

Thank you for your service,
Cristina Lupano
Westside resident

20.98 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Ellen Sevy <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 8:09 AM
To: City Council
Subject: westclif one way vs 2 ways
Dear council,
I believe you are having a vote on April 9th related to One way traffic on west cliff.

There is plenty of room for 2 way traffic on west cliff.

The westside neighborhoods have not been properly involved in the plan for one traffic. I for one cant find a map of the reroute.

Santa Cruz has a responsibility to protect the residents of the westside . Please do not reroute all that traffic into our neighborhoods.

I bike and enjoy west cliff but we do not need a 2 way bike bath in the street. We need to keep the traffic out of the neighborhoods which increased with the cliff failures.

Thank you
Ellen Sevy
westside 47 years

20.99 1
Rosemary Balsley
From: Addison Jacobs <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 8:31 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Agenda Item #20 April 9, 2024 Council Agenda
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
We are writing to express our disappointment and confusion regarding proposed plans for West Cliff Drive, particularly in regard to the section between Woodrow and Almar avenues. Our home is on Oxford Way between Almar and David Way.

While we understand the dilemmas presented with the erosion and damage along West Cliff, we are puzzled and alarmed by the recommendations made by staff regarding traffic flow in the adjacent neighborhood. We have been active in following progress and engagement activities regarding the West Cliff 50-Year Plan and are surprised that there has been no outreach to our neighborhood regarding the new proposals for traffic flow and abatement.

We ask City Council to postpone this important decision until adequate outreach has been conducted in the impacted neighborhoods, especially those adjacent to West Cliff with temporary traffic calming measures currently in place. We have worked through the original changes and would like to be included in the designs for the new traffic impacts and plans.

Sincerely,
Don and Addison Jacobs

20.100
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Shane Skelton <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 8:40 AM
To: City Council
Cc: Richie Schmidt; Anthony Ruffo; Brian Waters; Bob Pearson Subject: Keep West Cliff Two-Way Petition Results
Attachments: Keep West Cliff Drive Two-Way_Petition.xls; petition_comments_jobs_37915597_20240407092934.xls Hi Santa Cruz Council Members,
I wanted to share the petition and a couple of key takeaways with this group:
• Petition link HERE
• Signature list attached
• 2,255 signatures with only five duplicate signatures that would like to see West Cliff Drive remain two-way. This means our sample size is currently 2,250
• 46% (1,035 signatures) live in the 95060 or 95062 area codes (see Santa Cruz County zip code map below)
• 50% of signatures listed living in Santa Cruz City
• 86 people took the time to comment on why they signed and why they would like to see WCD remain two-way (see attached comments file)
• I have sent an update email to all 2,250 people who signed. The email that went out via Change.org is attached.

20.101
2 Best,
Shane Skelton

20.102
B. Ricca Taga-an Philippines 4/6/2024

20.103
Name City State Postal Code Country Signed On
Bonnie Salter Santa Cruz CA 945 US 3/11/2024
Lucy Mars Ohio 1000 US 3/24/2024
Jaz Flanagan South Hadley MA 1075 US 3/7/2024
Jack MacDonald-Hilton Worcester MA 1609 US 3/9/2024
Danielle ChaceWorcester MA 1610 US 3/13/2024
Henry Thibodeau Dracut MA 1826 US 3/12/2024
Carolyn leasonWakefield MA 1880 US 3/31/2024
Nathaniel Boustani Roxbury Crossing MA 2120 US 3/11/2024 Daniel Abreu Everett MA 2121 US 3/29/2024
Brenna Pre Jamaica Plain MA 2130 US 3/19/2024
John A. Copeland IV Malden MA 2148 US 3/6/2024
Angelica L Chelsea MA 2150 US 3/6/2024
Milva Smith Medford MA 2155 US 3/26/2024
Elta Cavius Whitman MA 2382 US 3/13/2024
Prince Abad Warwick RI 2888 US 3/18/2024
scott Bradley Bristol VT 5443 US 3/11/2024
Caitlin Rogers Storrs CT 6269 US 3/20/2024
steven NicholsMexico City 6840 Mexico 3/4/2024
Victoria Dimitrova Hoboken NJ 7030 US 3/10/2024
justin ali Springfield Township NJ 7081 US 3/5/2024
Angela Concepcion Jersey City NJ 7305 US 3/28/2024
Anthony GiglioLong branch NJ 7750 US 3/8/2024
Alana PreziosiSwedesboro NJ 8085 US 3/16/2024
Edward Peterson Cape May NJ 8204 US 4/1/2024
Brian Carney Middle Township NJ 8210 US 3/6/2024
Rosa CabrerizoHospitalet de Llobregat 8905 Spain 3/26/2024 Post Malone New York NY 10004 US 3/7/2024
Monique Boudreaux Santa Cruz CA 10016 US 3/7/2024
Consuelo Serena Velasco Strambino Fr Cerone 10019 Italy 3/27/2024 isisblu Tumasonsanta cruz CA 10118 US 3/8/2024
Bella Dunbar Brooklyn NY 11201 US 3/10/2024
Christoff EricsonBrooklyn NY 11207 US 3/21/2024
Aristea Palma Riccio Fisher Brooklyn NY 11219 US 3/18/2024 Jon Inwood Brooklyn NY 11226 US 3/9/2024
Annmarie Corkett Richmond HillNY 11418 US 3/25/2024
Jennifer SantanaWoodhaven NY 11421 US 3/28/2024
Eileen Huber East Meadow NY 11554 US 3/31/2024
Carol BushelonCoram NY 11727 US 3/13/2024
Jake Schafer Huntington NY 11743 US 3/6/2024
Liza Shapiro Walden NY 12586 US 3/10/2024

20.104
Aaron EmersonDiamond pointNY 12824 US 3/28/2024
Samane Paya Binghamton NY 13905 US 3/30/2024
Julie Knapp Palmyra NY 14522 US 3/17/2024
N R Rochester NY 14620 US 4/4/2024
Fatemeh Rahimi Ithaca NY 14850 US 4/2/2024
Edwin CisnerosPittsburgh PA 15220 US 3/23/2024
Darcie AndradeSanta Cruz CA 16406 US 3/11/2024
candy davenport Booklyn NY 17622 US 4/2/2024
alicia dobre Philadelphia PA 19111 US 3/28/2024
Kamo Leda New Castle DE 19720 US 4/3/2024
Christopher Adams Washington DC 20011 US 3/7/2024
Sullivan HawkeyNokesville VA 20181 US 3/30/2024
Mohra Ali Laurel MD 20723 US 3/15/2024
Valentina Vanos Silver Spring MD 20910 US 3/8/2024
Stefano Fuschetto Gallarate 21013 Italy 3/22/2024
Claire Davitt Annapolis MD 21037 US 3/11/2024
Olumide Fagbohunka Baltimore MD 21218 US 3/5/2024
mason martinCentreville MD 21617 US 3/21/2024
Deborah Eileen Kirby Alexandria VA 22304 US 3/7/2024
glory clark Stafford VA 22554 US 3/24/2024
[email protected] Richmond VA Webb 23223 US 3/6/2024 Suezette MonteFrankford WV 24938 US 3/29/2024
Rachel Kerns Charleston WV 25302 US 4/3/2024
John Hutton Winston-salemNC 27104 US 3/16/2024
jill angelichio charlotte NC 28204 US 3/4/2024
Foxy.will.furry Wii Charlotte NC 28205 US 3/31/2024
Kaitlyn Taylor Charlotte NC 28208 US 3/16/2024
Gianna McCloudCharlotte NC 28227 US 3/18/2024
Peter Smith Wilmington NC 28403 US 3/26/2024
Austin Oliver Richlands NC 28574 US 3/9/2024
Anna Sasser Burnsville NC 28714 US 3/6/2024
Todd SchroederMoncks CornerSC 29461 US 3/26/2024
Lynn Thomas Bluffton SC 29910 US 3/7/2024
James Rice Acworth GA 30101 US 3/12/2024
Micheal NubenTemple GA 30179 US 3/14/2024
Molly Crivelli Atlanta GA 30301 US 3/5/2024
Jim Parsons Atlanta GA 30338 US 3/7/2024
Karen ShinsatoAtlanta GA 30340 US 3/7/2024
Jordan simpkinsAtlanta GA 30342 US 3/8/2024
jorian welch Winder GA 30680 US 3/16/2024
Chaylee Rush Columbus GA 31904 US 3/18/2024

20.105
Cory Lopez Daytona BeachFL 32118 US 3/6/2024
Karen Haich Edgewater FL 32141 US 3/18/2024
Chris Boening Jacksonville FL 32209 US 3/4/2024
Susset Lopes Orlando FL 32801 US 4/5/2024
Margie FloresOrlando FL 32828 US 3/21/2024
Victoria BolanosMelbourne 32901 US 3/18/2024
Ron Kirk Palm Bay FL 32909 US 3/8/2024
Zoe Chait Cape Canaveral FL 32920 US 3/8/2024
Rosalia MorrazHialeah 33018 US 3/21/2024
Maria MorenoFl. FL 33018 US 3/29/2024
Robert MaderaHollywood FL 33021 US 3/9/2024
A D Hollywood FL 33026 US 4/5/2024
LeeAnn Sherwood Pompano BeachFL 33064 US 3/6/2024
Bryan CaprilesMiami FL 33129 US 3/7/2024
Victor Saccotelli miami FL 33132 US 3/6/2024
Colin Proctor Miami FL 33162 US 3/11/2024
Gladys GonzalezMiami FL 33169 US 4/5/2024
Michelle Ramirez Miami FL 33179 US 4/4/2024
Patty Quan Miami FL 33197 US 3/7/2024
nathaly debs wellington FL 33414 US 4/5/2024
April Hinton Tampa FL 33613 US 3/6/2024
Brandon Melkonian Brighton CO 33647 US 3/5/2024
shelley VickeryLargo FL 33774 US 3/5/2024
Christopher Joseph CHALMERS Spring Hill FL 34609 US 3/22/2024 Todd Poth Holiday FL 34610 US 4/5/2024
Erika RikhiramClermont FL 34711 US 3/5/2024
Annie Zhang Winter GardenFL 34787 US 3/10/2024
Darrell JohnsonStuart FL 34997 US 4/1/2024
Hannah MillerRed Bay AL 35582 US 3/19/2024
Mark Wilkins Rainbow City AL 35906 US 3/4/2024
Brody Wilks Henagar AL 35978 US 3/27/2024
Brooklyn Guy Ooltewah TN 37363 US 3/28/2024
Lisa Brent Bristol TN 37620 US 3/27/2024
Jeramine Glover Clinton MS 39056 US 4/3/2024
Christina YoakumLouisville KY 40207 US 3/7/2024
Nathan Baker Louisville KY 40207 US 4/6/2024
Rosendo Alvarez Louisville KY 40215 US 3/13/2024
Kurt McCombsBrownsville KY 42210 US 3/13/2024
Raquel Ryan Washington Court House OH 43160 US 3/22/2024 Sondra Richardson Cleveland OH 44132 US 3/5/2024
Audrey Davenport Cleveland OH 44137 US 3/9/2024

20.106
Emmett CorbyCincinnati OH 45223 US 3/26/2024
Robin Goff Fishers IN 46037 US 3/11/2024
Laurie KomlancIndianapolis IN 46221 US 4/6/2024
BALL SCOTT Indianapolis IN 46234 US 3/16/2024
Frances Volpi La Porte IN 46350 US 3/8/2024
Jonathan MillerFort Wayne IN 46808 US 3/28/2024
Daniel Story Bloomington IN 47403 US 3/11/2024
Robert PalmerWarren MI 48092 US 3/15/2024
Michelle Candler Farmington Hills MI 48334 US 3/27/2024 Paul Markillie Grand Blanc Township MI 48439 US 3/30/2024 Austin Smith Watervliet MI 49098 US 4/1/2024
Quinn HodgesHudson WI 54016 US 3/7/2024
David Scott Northfield MN 55057 US 3/29/2024
Li Harve Minneapolis MN 55418 US 3/29/2024
Stacia KingslandMinneapolis MN 55454 US 3/6/2024
Merlia Maldonado Mountain LakeMN 56159 US 3/31/2024
Rachel Bivins Hamilton MT 59840 US 3/7/2024
Jessica GodinezMelrose Park IL 60160 US 3/8/2024
Diya Patel Chicago IL 60602 US 3/27/2024
Jacob Broers Chicago IL 60602 US 4/5/2024
Maria Beury Chicago IL 60605 US 3/24/2024
Steve Fish Chicago IL 60614 US 3/10/2024
Michael ErhartChicago IL 60626 US 3/8/2024
Getachew Alemu Chicago IL 60637 US 3/31/2024
Clarence Williams Chicago IL 60644 US 3/28/2024
Michael LyonsCarlock IL 61725 US 3/7/2024
Natasha VanMeter St Louis MO 63114 US 3/12/2024
Ariana CannionBlue Springs MO 64015 US 3/20/2024
Autumn NewtonOzark MO 65721 US 3/7/2024
Isabelle SeeverAtchison KS 66002 US 3/13/2024
Christopher Walker Dighton KS 67839 US 3/7/2024
Arnoldo Hernández Galván 68000 Mexico 3/9/2024
Delaney OdomKenner LA 70065 US 3/13/2024
Samuel ToledoSalina Cruz 70610 Mexico 3/9/2024
Chasity BraudNatchitoches LA 71457 US 3/19/2024
Casey Van Meter Mena AR 71953 US 3/12/2024
Angela SpiegleOklahoma CityOK 73114 US 3/6/2024
Victor Ramos Frisco TX 75034 US 3/26/2024
Hebert Legorreta Dallas TX 75231 US 3/8/2024
Sandy GuzmanDallas TX 75234 US 3/25/2024
Tobey BonakerDallas TX 75270 US 3/7/2024

20.107
Brian NewtonDallas TX 75270 US 3/7/2024
Xochi Pineda Dallas TX 75270 US 3/7/2024
Seyed alireza Arami Dallas TX 75270 US 4/2/2024
Jeremy BattleArlington TX 76011 US 3/8/2024
Adam Kaluba Burleson TX 76028 US 3/9/2024
JD Shaver Fort Worth TX 76112 US 4/3/2024
khalib Day Argyle TX 76226 US 3/10/2024
Carmen CastilloHouston TX 77006 US 3/8/2024
leslie woodingHouston TX 77057 US 4/7/2024
Nelly PRESTATMouroux 77120 France 3/27/2024
silly goose Spring TX 77388 US 3/20/2024
Sofia Caulier Katy TX 77450 US 3/19/2024
Jack Allen New BraunfelsTX 78130 US 3/7/2024
Tyler Walker San Antonio TX 78254 US 3/13/2024
Edgardo Bobadilla Edinburg TX 78542 US 3/31/2024
Christina Feurtado Cedar park TX 78613 US 3/27/2024
Desta Baker Austin TX 78745 US 3/12/2024
Stephan PalmerAustin TX 78748 US 3/6/2024
Jessica Olson Englewood 80110 US 3/16/2024
Kevin Lewis Denver CO 80207 US 3/13/2024
Z Haas Denver CO 80214 US 3/4/2024
Clark Codiga Denver CO 80219 US 3/8/2024
Emily Hightower Lakewood CO 80226 US 3/7/2024
John BertolucciLakewood CO 80228 US 3/7/2024
Bobby Gere Denver CO 80229 US 3/6/2024
Ashleigh CarlsonDenver CO 80247 US 3/12/2024
Ousmane Soanga Denver CO 80252 US 4/1/2024
Patricia Whitlock Longmont CO 80501 US 3/14/2024
Laken RutledgeLongmont CO 80504 US 3/6/2024
Francesca Barelli Fort Collins CO 80521 US 3/7/2024
Ashley Lewis Fort Collins CO 80521 US 3/7/2024
Linda Richardson Clifton CO 81520 US 3/8/2024
Robin Vance Rifle CO 81650 US 4/2/2024
Kellee Boese Emmett ID 83617 US 3/5/2024
Karen WeldonHomedale ID 83628 US 3/8/2024
Dave Brockmann Star ID 83664 US 3/7/2024
Jocelyn DohertyBoise ID 83706 US 3/12/2024
Michael Marshall Boise ID 83716 US 3/5/2024
Amaya BrownLayton UT 84041 US 3/6/2024
koa depuydt Salt Lake City UT 84107 US 3/6/2024
Mariah Hicks Salt Lake City UT 84129 US 3/6/2024

20.108
Campbell BethPhoenix AZ 85018 US 3/4/2024
Elen Duenas Phoenix AZ 85028 US 3/29/2024
Melissa Morales Chandler AZ 85224 US 3/6/2024
Ashley WeibelChandler AZ 85248 US 3/26/2024
Jazalyn Piña Tempe AZ 85281 US 3/11/2024
️N Laws Peoria AZ 85383 US 3/27/2024
Mark Garrett Cottonwood AZ 86326 US 3/4/2024
Beverley PearceAlbuquerque NM 87114 US 3/8/2024
Chris Otto Santa Fe NM 87507 US 3/12/2024
Denisha WarrenHenderson NV 89074 US 3/7/2024
Jo Ann FontesLas Vegas NV 89107 US 3/8/2024
Carl Spruiel Las Vegas NV 89110 US 3/30/2024
Wesley ChisholmReno NV 89502 US 3/15/2024
Jack McCombieReno NV 89512 US 3/7/2024
Tanja SchachtHeidenheim 89522 US 4/1/2024
Steve Lamoreaux Carson City NV 89706 US 3/9/2024
Becky SullivanLos Angeles CA 90001 US 3/7/2024
David Okeefe Los Angeles CA 90006 US 3/6/2024
Yahel TownsendLos Angeles CA 90027 US 3/7/2024
Wani Ali Los Angeles CA 90027 US 3/10/2024
Ashy Sipl Los Angeles CA 90031 US 3/24/2024
Lily Harowitz Los Angeles CA 90034 US 3/6/2024
Kristen Alire Los Angeles CA 90034 US 3/10/2024
Kyla Couch Los Angeles CA 90036 US 3/7/2024
Connor Dilloughery Los Angeles CA 90044 US 3/6/2024
Rose Frates Los Angeles CA 90060 US 3/6/2024
Emma Antonetti Los Angeles CA 90060 US 3/6/2024
Mark Collins Los Angeles CA 90060 US 3/7/2024
David Foxx Los Angeles CA 90060 US 3/7/2024
Giosefine SapinoLos Angeles CA 90060 US 3/7/2024
Josh mahony Los Angeles CA 90060 US 3/8/2024
Nery Garcia Los Angeles CA 90060 US 3/8/2024
Kathy Colt Los Angeles CA 90060 US 3/9/2024
Randa Ashley Culver City CA 90230 US 3/6/2024
Alexander spear Hawthorne CA 90250 US 3/7/2024
Arden GillbergLynwood CA 90262 US 3/12/2024
Max MalamedSanta Monica CA 90403 US 3/6/2024
Sonia Servin Lakewood CA 90713 US 3/15/2024
Lesley Baker Long Beach CA 90803 US 3/6/2024
Lucas Neves Duarte CA 91010 US 3/7/2024
ROSE MARIE SMITH TUJUNGA CA 91042 US 3/12/2024

20.109
Kent Courter North Hills CA 91343 US 3/6/2024
Justin Jewell Mission Hills CA 91345 US 3/5/2024
peggy judson nelson Panrama CityCA 91402 US 3/6/2024
Richard ReyesVan Nuys CA 91405 US 3/6/2024
Carlie Davis Diamond Bar CA 91765 US 3/8/2024
Blake PearsonCarlsbad CA 92008 US 3/6/2024
Robert LeonelliCarlsbad CA 92009 US 3/8/2024
Nancy Wilder Carlsbad CA 92009 US 3/8/2024
Bryce Burk Escondido CA 92029 US 3/7/2024
Roger M Oceanside CA 92056 US 3/6/2024
macy waters Carlsbad CA 92069 US 3/12/2024
Scott Nelson San Marcos CA 92078 US 3/6/2024
Laura Frank Vista CA 92084 US 3/8/2024
Heather Isaac Vista 92084 US 3/19/2024
Kai Abel La Jolla CA 92092 US 3/7/2024
Greta MitchellLa Jolla CA 92092 US 3/7/2024
Tyler GottsegenSan Diego CA 92101 US 3/7/2024
Kymberly Lee San Diego CA 92103 US 3/6/2024
Michael BolognaSan Diego CA 92106 US 3/8/2024
tera hall San Diego CA 92107 US 3/11/2024
Itai Benisty San Diego CA 92107 US 3/11/2024
Kayly MoriartySan Diego CA 92109 US 3/7/2024
JohnAngelo Pezzini San Diego CA 92109 US 3/7/2024
Spencer Mill San Diego CA 92109 US 3/18/2024
Gustavo JacoboSan Diego CA 92110 US 3/8/2024
Sebastian Joseph San Diego CA 92111 US 3/6/2024
Bryden Montgomery San Diego CA 92115 US 3/7/2024
carson robersonSan Diego CA 92115 US 3/7/2024
Lucy b San Diego CA 92115 US 3/7/2024
Evan AnsgariusSan Diego CA 92115 US 3/8/2024
Kim Kishi San Diego CA 92120 US 3/8/2024
Mark Taku Indio CA 92201 US 3/8/2024
Dylan KamleiterFontana CA 92335 US 3/6/2024
Nichole CorpuzFontana CA 92335 US 3/29/2024
Ronald Hart Loma Linda CA 92354 US 3/31/2024
Aidan M. Irvine CA 92617 US 3/8/2024
Alex Sands HB CA 92646 US 3/6/2024
Keohen SmithHuntington Beach CA 92648 US 3/15/2024
Darren BrilhartHuntington Beach CA 92649 US 3/6/2024
James DunlopLaguna BeachCA 92651 US 3/11/2024
Gavin Faridi Aliso Viejo CA 92656 US 3/6/2024

20.110
Kolohe AndinoSan ClementeCA 92672 US 3/6/2024
Jean Coe San ClementeCA 92672 US 3/6/2024
Ian Crane San ClementeCA 92673 US 3/6/2024
Gwyneth LYONSan Juan Capistrano CA 92675 US 3/6/2024
Milana Gorobchenko Mission Viejo CA 92691 US 3/7/2024
Donna Shine Ladera Ranch CA 92694 US 3/20/2024
Nathan Byers Santa Ana CA 92701 US 3/7/2024
Anika Young Dana Point CA 92724 US 3/7/2024
Takumi Nishikawa Anheim CA 92808 US 3/7/2024
Lisa Sturgill Fullerton CA 92831 US 3/7/2024
Veronica Farquhar Ornge CA 92868 US 3/8/2024
isabella birkhofer Orange CA 92869 US 3/7/2024
Braeden SteeleCorona CA 92879 US 3/6/2024
Bryan HerbertCorona CA 92879 US 3/6/2024
Pat Ecker Ventura CA 93001 US 3/8/2024
Marcus YoungVentura CA 93001 US 3/11/2024
Terrence RedingVentura CA 93003 US 3/7/2024
John SummersVentura CA 93003 US 3/8/2024
Rym PartridgeVentura CA 93003 US 3/11/2024
Amy Blair Santa BarbaraCA 93109 US 3/13/2024
Eden Burnett Goleta CA 93117 US 3/6/2024
Alex Teves Goleta CA 93117 US 3/7/2024
bella simmontGoleta CA 93117 US 3/7/2024
rafaela putnamGoleta CA 93117 US 3/7/2024
Indi Whittick Goleta CA 93117 US 3/7/2024
Chloe HillearyGoleta CA 93117 US 3/8/2024
Morgan Roth Goleta CA 93117 US 3/8/2024
Brooke Henderson Goleta CA 93117 US 3/8/2024
Payton WrightSanta BarbaraCA 93120 US 3/6/2024
Benjy Darrow Ducor CA 93218 US 3/7/2024
Bethany OliveiraLemoore CA 93245 US 3/10/2024
Thatgirl TwentyBakersfield CA 93304 US 4/3/2024
Kayla MendozaBakersfield CA 93312 US 3/7/2024
Brian Espy San Luis ObispoCA 93401 US 3/6/2024
Ryan Smith San Luis ObispoCA 93401 US 3/12/2024
Faith Bartlett San Luis ObispoCA 93405 US 3/6/2024
Colton Christ San Luis ObispoCA 93405 US 3/6/2024
Noelle SaltikovSan Luis ObispoCA 93405 US 3/7/2024
Makena KeaneSan Luis ObispoCA 93405 US 3/7/2024
Mairin MullenSan Luis ObispoCA 93410 US 3/7/2024
Ashley Renda San Luis ObispoCA 93410 US 3/8/2024

20.111
Madison KudskArroyo GrandeCA 93420 US 3/6/2024
Kevin CampionAtascadero CA 93422 US 3/8/2024
Nancy Bright Morro Bay CA 93442 US 3/7/2024
j niccoli kevin Santa Maria CA 93455 US 3/7/2024
Darin Collins Clovis CA 93613 US 3/30/2024
Shelly Rader Clovis CA 93619 US 3/7/2024
Mia Hunt Dos Palos CA 93620 US 3/10/2024
Joey RodriguezMadera CA 93637 US 3/7/2024
angelina Guerrero Fresno CA 93703 US 3/7/2024
Johanna KinterFresno CA 93711 US 3/11/2024
Lily Herbert Fresno CA 93720 US 3/4/2024
Betty Caster Fresno CA 93726 US 3/6/2024
kimberly slevinSalinas CA 93901 US 3/11/2024
Alexander Gutierrez Salinas CA 93905 US 3/8/2024
Mike Ferrin Salinas CA 93905 US 3/8/2024
bella vargas Salinas CA 93906 US 3/7/2024
Edna Brown Salinas CA 93906 US 3/11/2024
Belene Rodriguez Salinas CA 93907 US 3/8/2024
Tara Roach Salinas CA 93907 US 3/11/2024
Cole Sjoblom Salinas CA 93908 US 3/6/2024
Elise Soto Salinas CA 93908 US 3/7/2024
Natalia LapioliSalinas CA 93908 US 3/8/2024
celeste frye Salinas CA 93908 US 3/10/2024
Thomas De MeoSanta Cruz CA 93912 US 3/6/2024
Michael Kolar Salinas CA 93912 US 3/11/2024
William CornickCarmel CA 93923 US 3/12/2024
Christina Crumpton Greenfield CA 93927 US 3/7/2024
Sandy Rojas Lockwood CA 93932 US 3/10/2024
Nancy Cox Lepesh Monterey CA 93933 US 3/7/2024
Bruce GarrisonMarina CA 93933 US 3/7/2024
Phoebe Liermann Marina CA 93933 US 3/9/2024
Meredith Nohrden Moterey CA 93940 US 3/6/2024
Tim G Monterey CA 93940 US 3/6/2024
Heidi Green Monterey CA 93940 US 3/8/2024
Alicia Suits Monterey CA 93940 US 3/8/2024
Lilian Lane Monterey CA 93940 US 3/12/2024
Kelly SorensenMonterey CA 93940 US 3/16/2024
Jason AndersonMonterey CA 93940 US 3/30/2024
Frank Ono Pacific Grove CA 93950 US 3/7/2024
Josh Loya Seaside CA 93955 US 3/5/2024
Erika MoncayoSeaside CA 93955 US 3/7/2024

20.112
kirra brrnardi Seaside CA 93955 US 3/8/2024
Jamison MaidenSeaside CA 93955 US 3/8/2024
Linda Minor Seaside CA 93955 US 4/7/2024
Ian HepworthBurlingame CA 94010 US 3/6/2024
Sheryl Calson Burlingame CA 94010 US 3/12/2024
Sean Amick Daly City CA 94015 US 3/7/2024
Koa Cortina Daly City CA 94015 US 3/8/2024
Jack Hage Daly City CA 94015 US 3/8/2024
Enzo PalomataDaly City CA 94015 US 3/9/2024
Lorenzo Palomata Daly City CA 94015 US 3/27/2024
Gavin TomberlinHalf moon bayCA 94018 New Zealand 3/8/2024 Bryan CussinsHalf Moon BayCA 94019 US 3/4/2024
Dan OBrien Half Moon BayCA 94019 US 3/7/2024
Justin D'Orio Half Moon BayCA 94019 US 3/7/2024
Robert Adam Half Moon BayCA 94019 US 3/8/2024
Dominic Spinardi Half Moon BayCA 94019 US 3/8/2024
Brian OverfeltHalf Moon BayCA 94019 US 3/9/2024
Oliver KeetonHalf Moon BayCA 94019 US 3/11/2024
Gail NotmeyerHalf Moon BayCA 94019 US 3/11/2024
Дмитрий Никитин Menlo Park CA 94025 US 3/8/2024
Andre Yarme Atherton CA 94027 US 3/11/2024
Ragnar JohnsonMoss Beach CA 94038 US 3/8/2024
Doris JohnsonMoss Beach CA 94038 US 3/8/2024
Tony CanadasMoss Beach CA 94038 US 3/9/2024
Mark Hochstetler Moss Beach CA 94038 US 3/27/2024
Cristina LupanoMountain ViewCA 94040 US 3/6/2024
Teresa van Osdol Mountain ViewCA 94041 US 3/6/2024
Steve FreemanMountain ViewCA 94043 US 3/6/2024
Ivan Gavric Pacifica CA 94044 US 3/5/2024
Derek Gomez Pacifica CA 94044 US 3/7/2024
Shawn RhodesPacifica CA 94044 US 3/8/2024
Camille KeatingPacifica CA 94044 US 3/8/2024
Clinton EnglerPacifica CA 94044 US 3/8/2024
Jacqueline Auerbach Pacifica CA 94044 US 3/8/2024
Koby Savin Pacifica CA 94044 US 3/8/2024
Aleia AndersonPacific CA 94044 US 3/8/2024
Shona KeatingPacifica CA 94044 US 3/8/2024
April SchneiderPacifica CA 94044 US 3/8/2024
Mary Dussell Pescadero CA 94060 US 3/10/2024
Tom Sargis Redwood CityCA 94061 US 3/5/2024
Mark RutherfordSan Carlos CA 94062 US 3/7/2024

20.113
Shaunti QuiliciRedwood CityCA 94063 US 3/6/2024
Mohamad Zandkarimi Redwood CityCA 94063 US 3/7/2024
Randall FrenchRedwood CityCA 94063 US 3/7/2024
Natalie HofkinsRedwood CityCA 94063 US 3/7/2024
Nichole EvansSanta Cruz CA 94063 US 3/8/2024
lexie fiorenza Santa Cruz CA 94063 US 3/8/2024
Maya Snyder Redwood CityCA 94063 US 3/8/2024
Ella Catalano-Dockins San Bruno CA 94066 US 3/8/2024
Jason Kadilak San Carlos CA 94070 US 3/8/2024
Melissa PelaezSouth San Francisco CA 94080 US 3/4/2024
Michael OfieshSouth San Francisco CA 94080 US 3/5/2024
MacKenzie Santiago South San Francisco CA 94080 US 3/11/2024 Paul Artau Sunnyvale CA 94086 US 3/7/2024
Jade Harris Sunnyvale CA 94086 US 3/7/2024
Cristian AlvarezSunnyvale CA 94087 US 3/6/2024
Chris Sheerer Nadi CA 94087 Fiji 3/7/2024
Li Soskic Santa Cruz CA 94087 US 3/7/2024
Kellie Fortes San Francisco CA 94102 US 3/6/2024
Tori Coffer San Francisco CA 94102 US 3/8/2024
Kami MontanezSan Francisco CA 94102 US 3/8/2024
Tricia kirby San Francisco CA 94102 US 4/4/2024
Natasha GunionSan Francisco CA 94103 US 3/7/2024
Kaden WaltripSan Francisco CA 94103 US 3/9/2024
Dennis Smith San Francisco CA 94105 US 3/12/2024
David SchwartzSan Francisco CA 94105 US 4/6/2024
John Little-Wolf San Francisco CA 94107 US 3/7/2024
Vaughn WhiteSan Francisco CA 94109 US 3/7/2024
Griffin Tietz San Francisco CA 94109 US 3/11/2024
Chris DunhamSan Francisco CA 94110 US 3/6/2024
Nichole SultanaSan Francisco CA 94110 US 3/6/2024
Robin Lopez San Francisco CA 94110 US 3/11/2024
nancy HoughtbySan Francisco CA 94110 US 3/13/2024
Janet Loehr San Francisco CA 94112 US 3/11/2024
Tess Reedy San Francisco CA 94114 US 3/8/2024
Jai Grace San Francisco CA 94117 US 3/7/2024
Jarrod Ryan Baumann San Francisco CA 94117 US 3/12/2024 marcello tomasini San Francisco CA 94118 US 3/10/2024
Nathan Solomon Kalab San Francisco CA 94118 US 3/11/2024 Victor Tran San Francisco CA 94121 US 3/6/2024
Brent Morris San Francisco CA 94121 US 3/6/2024
Hunter BuemanSan Francisco CA 94121 US 3/7/2024

20.114
C H San Francisco CA 94122 US 3/4/2024
Bobby Burge San Francisco CA 94122 US 3/6/2024
Emilie Mullin San Francisco CA 94122 US 3/7/2024
Addison BakerSan Francisco CA 94122 US 3/8/2024
Riki Kim San francisco CA 94122 US 3/8/2024
Nick EnthovenSan Francisco CA 94122 US 3/8/2024
James LahartySan Francisco CA 94122 US 3/11/2024
Camilo Arana San Francisco CA 94122 US 3/12/2024
Michelle OuseSan Francisco CA 94123 US 3/6/2024
Nathan LindsaySan Francisco CA 94123 US 3/7/2024
Arun Frances San Francisco CA 94123 US 3/8/2024
jordan engler San Francisco CA 94123 US 3/8/2024
Barbara WrightSan Francisco CA 94124 US 3/6/2024
Mark Adams San Francisco CA 94124 US 3/8/2024
Deana RabiahSan Francisco CA 94130 US 3/7/2024
Joseph StagnaroSan Francisco CA 94133 US 3/7/2024
Barbara ThornSan Francisco CA 94134 US 3/4/2024
John ManningSan Francisco CA 94134 US 3/4/2024
Robert Diaz San Francisco CA 94134 US 3/5/2024
Jeff Blanton San Francisco CA 94134 US 3/7/2024
quinn turowskiSan Francisco CA 94134 US 3/8/2024
Dean CoppolaSan Francisco CA 94142 US 3/8/2024
doug kantor San Francisco CA 94142 US 3/11/2024
Jeff Moise San Francisco CA 94142 US 3/12/2024
Jalyn Rich Sacramento CA 94203 US 3/7/2024
Zoie Prince Sacramento CA 94204 US 3/8/2024
Julie Butler Sacramento CA 94230 US 3/29/2024
Bob Philepe Palo Alto CA 94303 US 3/6/2024
Margaret CohenStanford CA 94305 US 3/5/2024
Seth Rhodes Stanford CA 94305 US 3/8/2024
STEPHEN Iverson San Mateo CA 94401 US 3/5/2024
Bordy Obrien San Mateo CA 94401 US 3/7/2024
Kristen O'BrienSan Mateo CA 94401 US 3/7/2024
Jason Gasser San Mateo CA 94401 US 3/8/2024
Donald Sakai San Mateo CA 94402 US 3/4/2024
Clint Hallsted San Mateo CA 94402 US 3/5/2024
Shaun Walter San Mateo CA 94402 US 3/8/2024
Nathan Bear San Mateo CA 94403 US 3/8/2024
Elias Richter Benicia CA 94510 US 3/11/2024
Antonio Monter Bentwood CA 94513 US 3/7/2024
Janet Waters Brentwood CA 94513 US 3/11/2024

20.115
John Gibbons Antioch CA 94531 US 3/8/2024
Yanina SorensonFremont CA 94536 US 3/6/2024
Ashley CarnigliaFremont CA 94536 US 3/7/2024
Nick Nollen Fremont CA 94538 US 3/7/2024
Destanie SmithFremont CA 94538 US 3/11/2024
lex Sutton Hayward CA 94541 US 3/7/2024
Amber Yale Hayward CA 94541 US 3/8/2024
franny Timar Hayward CA 94541 US 3/8/2024
Amaya MooreHayward CA 94541 US 3/9/2024
Claire Wirt Hayward CA 94543 US 3/6/2024
Irene Rinaldi Hayward CA 94544 US 3/5/2024
Kari Jordan Hayward CA 94544 US 3/6/2024
Christian DeansHayward CA 94544 US 3/7/2024
mika rosen Hayward CA 94544 US 3/7/2024
LeeRoy BowlesHayward CA 94544 US 3/7/2024
Cathryn PerryHayward CA 94544 US 3/9/2024
Christina TopeHayward CA 94544 US 3/10/2024
Hugo Barthelmess Castro Valley CA 94546 US 3/6/2024
Jacob AuldridgeCastro Valley CA 94546 US 3/6/2024
Josh Frates Livermore CA 94550 US 3/6/2024
Yoshi Kim Livermore CA 94550 US 3/7/2024
Utkarsh Nath Fremont CA 94555 US 3/13/2024
Andrew BurgerRedwood CityCA 94556 US 3/6/2024
Alex Patel Newark CA 94560 US 3/12/2024
Mike ArmstrongOrinda CA 94563 US 3/6/2024
athena chahinDublin CA 94568 US 3/8/2024
Dennis Rae Terra Hills CA 94572 US 3/6/2024
Gary Bayless Rodeo CA 94572 US 3/6/2024
Wesley Riccabona San Leandro CA 94577 US 3/5/2024
Lionel GoodmanSan Leandro CA 94578 US 3/7/2024
Katie Conley San Leandro CA 94578 US 3/7/2024
sammy valenciaSan Leandro CA 94578 US 3/8/2024
Max St. Denis Aptos CA 94580 US 3/6/2024
Spencer Kern San Lorenzo CA 94580 US 3/6/2024
Robert Terris Suisun CA 94585 US 3/11/2024
Mireya Villarreal Union City CA 94587 US 3/6/2024
kayla freibergUnion City CA 94587 US 3/7/2024
Victoria Vialpando Union City CA 94587 US 3/7/2024
Wyatt Estes Union City CA 94587 US 3/7/2024
Balam LetonaUnion City CA 94587 US 3/7/2024
ruby brown Union City CA 94587 US 3/7/2024

20.116
Octavia JarrettUnion City CA 94587 US 3/8/2024
Vince Cuccia Union City CA 94587 US 3/8/2024
Miles Mcdermott Union City CA 94587 US 3/8/2024
Milah GammonOakland 94601 US 3/6/2024
Steven GrahamSanta Cruz CA 94602 US 3/8/2024
Chris BuonocoreOakland CA 94603 US 3/6/2024
Laura Findlay Oakland CA 94603 US 3/6/2024
Luke Maura Oakland CA 94603 US 3/6/2024
Jonah ChizinskyOakland CA 94603 US 3/6/2024
Joe Haebe Oakland CA 94603 US 3/6/2024
Kory Kvenild Oakland CA 94603 US 3/6/2024
Saul Palacios Oakland CA 94603 US 3/6/2024
Anna Miller Oakland CA 94603 US 3/6/2024
Becky Nutt Oakland CA 94603 US 3/6/2024
Dylan Lamb Oakland CA 94603 US 3/6/2024
Frosty HessonSanta Cruz CA 94603 US 3/6/2024
Darian TinsleyOakland CA 94603 US 3/7/2024
brett Gourvennec Oakland CA 94603 US 3/7/2024
Bruce CalderonOakland CA 94603 US 3/7/2024
Owen Glass Oakland CA 94603 US 3/7/2024
Nolan Mehl Oakland CA 94603 US 3/7/2024
Josie Valby Oakland CA 94603 US 3/7/2024
Randy Gray Oakland CA 94603 US 3/7/2024
sofia bottini Oakland CA 94603 US 3/7/2024
Jasmine FaberOakland CA 94603 US 3/7/2024
Jennifer Ruiz Oakland CA 94603 US 3/7/2024
Luke Salem Oakland CA 94603 US 3/7/2024
Pat Howard Oakland CA 94603 US 3/7/2024
Ella Walls Oakland CA 94603 US 3/8/2024
michelle zomerOakland CA 94603 US 3/8/2024
Ion Banner Oakland CA 94603 US 3/8/2024
Sindi Siler Oakland CA 94603 US 3/8/2024
Chloe ClarksonOakland CA 94603 US 3/8/2024
jeri limon Oakland CA 94603 US 3/8/2024
Zuzu Gaston Oakland CA 94603 US 3/9/2024
connor whitingOakland CA 94603 US 3/11/2024
Seth Taylor Oakland CA 94603 US 3/11/2024
Austin Snead Oakland CA 94603 US 3/11/2024
Max Falconer Oakland CA 94605 US 3/7/2024
Israel Diaz Oakland CA 94605 US 3/8/2024
Danika RogersOakland CA 94606 US 3/7/2024

20.117
tori cardinale Oakland CA 94606 US 3/7/2024
Bonnie FolkinsOakland CA 94606 US 3/8/2024
Jesse FreebairnOakland CA 94607 US 3/11/2024
Tina Collins Oakland CA 94607 US 3/11/2024
Narayana Dawson Emeryville CA 94608 US 3/7/2024
cassidy beck-watts Oakland CA 94610 US 3/8/2024
Judith Vlassis SANTA CRUZ CA 94610 US 3/12/2024
Susan BassanoOakland CA 94612 US 3/6/2024
Preston Pillsbury Santa Cruz CA 94612 US 3/6/2024
gina jones Oakland CA 94612 US 3/6/2024
Mei Greene Oakland CA 94612 US 3/7/2024
Ace Crane Oakland CA 94612 US 3/9/2024
Sky Zucker Oakland CA 94621 US 3/6/2024
Michael SaganOakland CA 94621 US 3/8/2024
Danielle Sion Oakland CA 94621 US 3/8/2024
Matt Riese Berkeley CA 94703 US 3/9/2024
savannah tumaBerkeley CA 94703 US 3/19/2024
ella ullrich Berkeley CA 94704 US 3/7/2024
Jessica Grey Berkeley CA 94707 US 4/4/2024
John WeaversCoffee San Rafael CA 94901 US 3/8/2024
Gage OconnorRohnert Park CA 94928 US 3/7/2024
Lincoln MosesRohnert Park CA 94928 US 3/7/2024
Parker Smith Rohnert Park CA 94928 US 3/7/2024
Joe McGough Rohnert Park CA 94928 US 3/12/2024
Karen SandovalRohnert Park CA 94928 US 3/14/2024
Jason BanisterMill Valley CA 94941 US 3/6/2024
Peyton Eberhardt Mill Valley CA 94941 US 3/11/2024
Julianne NorthNovato CA 94947 US 3/11/2024
Jason Glavis Petaluma CA 94954 US 3/30/2024
Hannah JacksonSan Anselmo CA 94960 US 3/6/2024
Pat Farley Aptos CA 95003 US 3/4/2024
Noah Dillman Aptos CA 95003 US 3/5/2024
Xiaoxia Feng Aptos CA 95003 US 3/5/2024
Elena Longsworth Aptos CA 95003 US 3/6/2024
Sean PoudrierAptos CA 95003 US 3/6/2024
Nate Tall Aptos CA 95003 US 3/6/2024
Zach Harrison-Evans Aptos CA 95003 US 3/6/2024
Grace SpangrudAptos CA 95003 US 3/6/2024
Morgan HainesSanta Cruz CA 95003 US 3/6/2024
Bridgette Quartararo Aptos CA 95003 US 3/6/2024
Don Faia Aptos CA 95003 US 3/6/2024

20.118
Chandler Escobar Aptos CA 95003 US 3/6/2024
Greg Heath Aptos CA 95003 US 3/6/2024
Julie Lindenberger Aptos CA 95003 US 3/6/2024
Frank VerdugoLSB CA 95003 US 3/6/2024
Sal Morales Aptos CA 95003 US 3/6/2024
Mikal Cuellar Aptos CA 95003 US 3/6/2024
Connor Spangrud Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
RIcardo uRbinaAptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Halo Stanger Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
John Ray Thomas Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Aidan Miele Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Jake Lanagan aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Jill GoodenoughAptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Josh Mattson Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Aaron BiermanAptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Todd GoudbergAptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Marji Sines Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
jeremy fentonSanta Cruz CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Arielle OrzechAptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Christina DerschAptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Ben Dotten Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Eric Farber Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Pamela Gonzalez Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Pauline Shumake Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Keira JamisonAptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Carlie Belville Santa Cruz CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Summer PlettAptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
kaitlyn taylor Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Vivienne Barrett Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Natasha RiberaAptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Nicole Diaz Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024
Etta Tyler Aptos CA 95003 US 3/8/2024
Dylan Weiler Aptos CA 95003 US 3/8/2024
Elijah Galster Santa Cruz CA 95003 US 3/8/2024
Tawnya SowdenAptos CA 95003 US 3/8/2024
Shelly Mesa Aptos CA 95003 US 3/8/2024
sophie walsh Aptos CA 95003 US 3/8/2024
Jocelyn SanchezAptos CA 95003 US 3/8/2024
Roseann Scrivens Santa Cruz CA 95003 US 3/8/2024
grace denningAptos CA 95003 US 3/8/2024
Jamari Didier Aptos CA 95003 US 3/8/2024

20.119
Randy Louis Aptos CA 95003 US 3/9/2024
Sebastian RoyerAptos CA 95003 US 3/9/2024
Gianna ImmelAptos CA 95003 US 3/9/2024
Laila Jaferian Aptos CA 95003 US 3/9/2024
Aubriana Williams Aptos CA 95003 US 3/9/2024
Kate WolsfeldAptos CA 95003 US 3/10/2024
Maryellen McNair Aptos CA 95003 US 3/10/2024
Mikka Luke Aptos CA 95003 US 3/10/2024
Anne Birch Aptos CA 95003 US 3/10/2024
Angelina Scoffone Aptos CA 95003 US 3/11/2024
Melissa Cramblet Aptos CA 95003 US 3/11/2024
Dave Huntley Aptos CA 95003 US 3/12/2024
Julie Kline Aptos CA 95003 US 3/14/2024
Claudia Slane Aptos CA 95003 US 3/16/2024
Gy Rubottom Aptos CA 95003 US 3/16/2024
Michele Reed Aptos CA 95003 US 3/17/2024
Tina Gomez Aptos CA 95003 US 3/17/2024
John DibartoloAptos CA 95003 US 3/17/2024
Christopher Chandler Aptos CA 95003 US 3/18/2024
Julia Knebel Aptos CA 95003 US 3/27/2024
Cindy Garay Ben Lomond CA 95005 US 3/6/2024
Jeff Barton Ben lomond CA 95005 US 3/6/2024
Collins Kristal Ben Lomond CA 95005 US 3/7/2024
mickey riciglianoFelton CA 95005 US 3/7/2024
Christy ReederBen lomond CA 95005 US 3/7/2024
Tram Joyce Ben Lomond CA 95005 US 3/7/2024
Jill Miller Ben Lomond CA 95005 US 3/7/2024
Nick Gibson Ben Lomond CA 95005 US 3/8/2024
Malea DobsonBen Lomond CA 95005 US 3/8/2024
Jonathan Stowers Ben Lomond CA 95005 US 3/10/2024
Hannah Pratt Ben Lomond CA 95005 US 3/11/2024
David McGuireBoulder CreekCA 95006 US 3/7/2024
Kirsten Mehl Boulder CreekCA 95006 US 3/7/2024
Emilee Harris Santa Cruz CA 95006 US 3/7/2024
Bella LeverenzSanta Cruz CA 95006 US 3/8/2024
Allyson YeagerBoulder CreekCA 95006 US 3/8/2024
Hailey Miller Scott’s valley CA 95006 US 3/9/2024
Jacob GrahamBoulder creekCA 95006 US 3/11/2024
Emma GipsonBoulder CreekCA 95006 US 3/11/2024
David SullivanBoulder CreekCA 95006 US 3/12/2024
Kevin McDonaldSan Jose CA 95008 US 3/7/2024

20.120
Charlotte Landis Capitola CA 95010 US 3/5/2024
Mary Hernandez Capitola CA 95010 US 3/6/2024
Lorena Miller Capitola CA 95010 US 3/6/2024
mckenzie dilloughery Capitola CA 95010 US 3/6/2024
Sue Seely Capitola CA 95010 US 3/6/2024
Peter Degnan Capitola CA 95010 US 3/6/2024
Mikayla KraatzSanta Cruz CA 95010 US 3/6/2024
Kit Hein Capitola CA 95010 US 3/6/2024
Nancy Thoennes Capitola CA 95010 US 3/7/2024
Jessica Birch Capitola CA 95010 US 3/7/2024
Jasmine BahouCapitola CA 95010 US 3/7/2024
Zachary SohnsCapitola CA 95010 US 3/7/2024
Wayne South Capitola CA 95010 US 3/7/2024
madison maclaughlin capitola CA 95010 US 3/8/2024
Deborah TaylorCapitola CA 95010 US 3/8/2024
Madeleine Molanchon Santa Cruz CA 95010 US 3/8/2024
Tim RubalcabaCapitola CA 95010 US 3/9/2024
Kerrie McCaffrey Capitola CA 95010 US 3/9/2024
Dane Young Capitola CA 95010 US 3/11/2024
Hailey DomichCapitola CA 95010 US 3/12/2024
Nico Marino Capitola CA 95010 US 3/12/2024
Dee Larson Rudin Capitola CA 95010 US 3/19/2024
Karole Longbrake Capitola CA 95010 US 3/27/2024
Nick Krest Cupertino CA 95014 US 3/11/2024
Carol ElsworthyDavenport CA 95017 US 3/7/2024
Deanna Hartley-LeBarre Davenport CA 95017 US 3/12/2024
Acacia Smith Davenport CA 95017 US 3/14/2024
Taryn RamlowFelton CA 95018 US 3/5/2024
Mateo KoehlerFelton CA 95018 US 3/6/2024
Holly Christiansen Felton CA 95018 US 3/6/2024
Cole SandmanFelton CA 95018 US 3/6/2024
Christopher Estep Felton CA 95018 US 3/6/2024
Skye Holmes Felton CA 95018 US 3/7/2024
Jayda DoulingerBlair St CA 95018 US 3/7/2024
poppy owens Santa Cruz CA 95018 US 3/7/2024
Cienna O’HaganFelton CA 95018 US 3/7/2024
John Griffin Felton CA 95018 US 3/7/2024
Chanel Lopez Mount HermonCA 95018 US 3/7/2024
Jake CartwrightSanta cruz CA 95018 US 3/7/2024
April CadenceFelton CA 95018 US 3/7/2024
Matt FinkelsteinFelton CA 95018 US 3/7/2024

20.121
Jonny ChestnutFelton CA 95018 US 3/7/2024
marcus smolanovich felton CA 95018 US 3/7/2024
Tessa Escott Felton CA 95018 US 3/7/2024
Brian Smith Felton CA 95018 US 3/7/2024
Ry Hamdy Felton CA 95018 US 3/8/2024
Lauri Lewis Felton CA 95018 US 3/8/2024
Heather MolloyFelton CA 95018 US 3/8/2024
Cindy Drage Felton CA 95018 US 3/17/2024
Karri ThygersenGilroy CA 95020 US 3/4/2024
joanne lewis gilroy CA 95020 US 3/7/2024
Ryan Resler Santa cruz CA 95023 US 3/7/2024
Adam Kagel Los Gatos CA 95030 US 3/8/2024
Kayla KentzellLos Gatos CA 95032 US 3/6/2024
Ashley ReardonLos Gatos CA 95032 US 3/6/2024
Gabriel Sandoval Los Gatos CA 95032 Netherlands 3/7/2024 Marcel Soros Los Gatos CA 95032 US 3/8/2024
Joseph Inch Los Gatos CA 95032 US 3/11/2024
erin rodenbaughLos Gatos CA 95033 US 3/7/2024
Mark Messa Los Gatos CA 95033 US 3/7/2024
Guido GraziosiSanta Cruz CA 95033 US 3/9/2024
Richard BeckerMorgan Hill CA 95037 US 3/7/2024
Doug FletcherSan Martin CA 95046 US 3/6/2024
Laura ColemanSan Martin CA 95046 US 3/13/2024
Sara Roach Santa Clara CA 95050 US 3/7/2024
Jess Ferrick Santa Clara CA 95051 US 3/11/2024
Bruno Proal Santa Clara CA 95052 US 3/7/2024
Nina Arrigoni Santa Clara CA 95052 US 3/7/2024
Michael Pitt Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/4/2024
Rigo Torkos Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/4/2024
penny tenorioSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/4/2024
Corrina Dilloughery Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/4/2024
Corrina Dilloughery Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/4/2024
Michael Dilloughery Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/4/2024
Tim Loomis Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/4/2024
Jason LoGiudiceSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/4/2024
Julie SkrommeSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/4/2024
Mike Nolte Santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/4/2024
Sheri Baxter Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Virginia Hartman Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Vince Broglio Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Ryan Doherty Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024

20.122
Shane Lewis Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Andrew Gere Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Georgann Caponigro Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Cori Elward Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Danny Santa Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Chad UnderhillSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Frederick Bensusan Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Douglas DeitchSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Richard Rodriguez Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Darryl VirostkoSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
zach wormhoudt Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Anthony RuffoSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
William MarottaSnta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Tom Powers Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Glenn Seiler Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Sara RidgewaySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Alex Viera Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Donna Karst Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Annette Lefever Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
geralddine Kaspar Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Troy Tenorio Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Kelli HirayamaSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Terri Baker Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Melissa MobleySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
MAGDALENA RAMIREZ Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Jim Meyer Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Logan Wells Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024
Robert WilliamsSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
maria cater Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Dash McElroy Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Carol Turner Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
john aird Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
kathy reimer-pearson santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
John Harker Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Kyle Costamagna Costamagna Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024 siobhan careysanta cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Carol Shulman-Mora Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Ulysses Marquez Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Sean CroghanSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
James DinsmoreSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Barbara Polhamius Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024

20.123
Andrew Lenz Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Antoinette Costa Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Daniel Coyro Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Willie Palmer JrSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Sarah Pippo Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Brandi Lombardi Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Peggy OverbeckSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Naomi strettonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Jazleen JacoboSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Roylene Champeaux Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Mahmoud Alnahlawi SANTA CRUZ CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Erica Spiegel Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Eden Bartlett Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Brian Waters Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Jeanette RicheySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Ginny MitchellSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
cody dumont Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Vivian St Shepard Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Annie Barrett Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Maureen Gallagher Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Kim Stoner Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
theresa tucciarelli Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Margaret Crawford Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Brad Bissell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Garrett LandonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Andrea Avila Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
mikey crimminsSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
James NakaharaSnta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
johanna seib Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Steve Ragatz Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Tom BrandowSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Derek Mori santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Robert MarioloSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Jake FitzpatrickSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Ian AbernathySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Caitlin GigliottiSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Reece Reber Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Kyla Reber Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Jacob Owings Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
John MathewsSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Myles Reber Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024

20.124
121 John Street Crocker Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024 Steve Lovell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Jeanine LovettSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Kathrine MauraSanta cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Keshia Fusari Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
shana BartlettSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Fisher Baxter Santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Katrina PorterSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Houston Roberts Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Sydney Scott Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Nick Bailey Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
David Hartley Santa Ceruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Patrick Hardcastle Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Alo Slebir Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Gayle Fitzsimmons Sata Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
taya henton santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Nancy Levan Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Merritt Hays Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Stephen Steward Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Keith Quilici Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Jill Fusari Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Sara Auble Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Michael Mcdermott Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Natasha reberSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Kate MathesonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Derek Cahill Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Gayle BensusanSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Giovanni caviglia Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Ryan Reber Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Emily Abend Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Ryan Miller Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Mike Attolico Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Kiera GormanSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Dana RayfieldSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Jay Fowler Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Ali Skander Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Benedikt Pongratz Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Malka Nagel Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Beverly TraceySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Samantha SinesSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Nicholas Silga Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024

20.125
Nicholas Thiemann Sta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Sarah DeWorkenSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
David Tambellini Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Miles Kern Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Erik Mullis Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Barbara Gallo Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Judy Chu Santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Janet Henton Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Lisa Orsini Koenig Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Garrit Brady Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Amy Zavala Miller Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
August swansonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Joe Jacob Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Timothy PearsonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Doug Haut Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Andrew Rivas Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
patrick montejano Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Rosemary Spitalny Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Apgar, Julia E Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Arturo Ayala Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
LEONARD RIMICCI Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
LOUIS CAVIGLIASanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Alden Brill Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Kathryn Downey Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Daniel Nutt Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Natalia FlechsigSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Paige Nutt Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Sunny Manzo Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
David Devries Seattle CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Lilly Dickens Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Peter Ogilvie Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Shane Crosby Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Gabe BalassoneSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Quentin Saludes Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Max Jones Santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Vincent JonesSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
brooke crumpton sata cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Kyle PedersonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Mark WightmanSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Cody EdgemonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Neil PearlbergSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024

20.126
Steve Tracey Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Erika Bell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Nick Farinsky Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Jennifer OateySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Alison ReasonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Blanca AlvarezSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
boden whittickSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Mark Demos Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
John Lindsay Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Brittney SnavelySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Dawn Fassio Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Emiliano Villarreal Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Macy Merrell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Steven M Hansmann Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
michael jolsonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
lillian smith Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
JD St. Denis Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Hermes Ferreirasnta cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Amelie StotlandSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Whitney Paul Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Dalton ZanettiSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Alex BirkhoferSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Parker Wood Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Daniel Hildebrand Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
susan elliott Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
scott williams Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
George Workman Sta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Sydney Harmount Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Erin Oneto Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Benjamin Worthen Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Kyla Scott Oakland CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Owen Lynch Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Madison Mitchell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Atzin Galmez-Marquez Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024
Brad Freitas Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Todd Skelton Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
cierra fielding Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Jami Foster Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Kim Brouse Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Rufus Hui Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Josh Flores Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024

20.127
Doug PearsonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Dominic De Salvo Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Linda Getz Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Shaya Craig Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Emily Kramer Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Kim Hallford Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Milan Golder Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
James Sclar Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
maile taylor Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
JF Dionne Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Phyllis Bonds Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
marissa lovellsanta cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Kaitlyn Wave Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Kevin Sueksdorf Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Hayden Mandell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Gigi Goldeen Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Jim Hunsaker Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Malia ManakoSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Omar Omar Padilla Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Evan Foy Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Martha SanchezSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Leilah Quilici Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Kai van Huyssteen Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
brooke mackellar Snta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Matthew O’Brien Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Brahm Sibley Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
zadie stack Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Maya KingsleySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Kaiti Ohmann Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Julio EcheverriaSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Kyle RaymondSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Marz FormentiSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Vince Golder Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Josh PedersonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Erin Lewis Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Jonathan Parker Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Brendan Bowman Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Julia Vandervoort Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Rumi Karimzadeh Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Michelle BlightSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
sarah lane Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024

20.128
Izabella ToledoSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
kai hoornbeckSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
poppy courseySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Carrie Brooks Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
lukas Adams Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Alejandro Mendoza Sant Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Jade Young Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Kristen YoungSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Catherine Brennan Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Jason WhitleySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Michael CooverSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Fredericka Hanson Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Joe Carlisle Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Lindy LombardiSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
summer Pederson Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Cristian Salas San Jose CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Connor Maliesky Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Jimmy HerrickSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Aaron MarquezSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Zachary Hill Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Gil Duran Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Scott Martini Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Charlotte Bell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Christian HarrisSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
stephen howells Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Lado Adlakha Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Judy Garrison Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Matt Parslow Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Ned Hearn Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Dahlia HavemanSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Garth Lewis Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Michael SullivanSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Elizabeth Sanders Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Jack HendersonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Julianna Mireles Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Barbie PalmerSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Logan Vanderpool Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Nicholas Demetras Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Kate DeGrasseSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Ana Krulec Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Natalie WengerSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024

20.129
Kaila Pearson Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Jacqueline Espinoza Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
mara charron Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Elinora BriscoeSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Acacia Ziai Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Franklin King Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Ed Guzman Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Peter Mel Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Becca Vaca Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Ryan Craig Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Kaia Myall Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Joey Scurich Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Zach McKay Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Sarah Shaughnessy Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Benjamin Lucchesi Santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Lyndzi MarinesSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Lilyana Ayala Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Kyle Kiff Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Lisa Banks Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Mary Beth Campbell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Penny StinsonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Paul Paul Pietryka Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Vanessa CuevasSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Hazel ChadwickSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Megan Lee Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Kelsey RudolphSanta cruZ CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Noel Laroche Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Caleb Strobel Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Jason WilliamsSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Marie Otis Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Dylan Linde Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Alivia Sutton-Ramerman Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Katie McCourtSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Charles BenhamSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Randy Quilici Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Eric Chin Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
shea main Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Greg Testorff Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Nick Meyer Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Maya Jensen Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Melissa Sobieraj Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024

20.130
peggy trish Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
nevada espinozaSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
kylee brixner santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Keely Green Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Valerie Wells Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
isla rosenthal Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Suzanne Flanders Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
amalia terrazasSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Adelina Waymire Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Robin Cunningham Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Cody Rupp Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
lucy bresler Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Briana Kaslin Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Priscilla FisherSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
marlee mayfieldSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Lauren Wills Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Tanner WalkerSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
ella lheureux Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Talyn Buell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Daniel Evert Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Josephine Aspromonte Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Zaina Alnahlawi Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Carolyn Williams Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Melanie MeyerSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Marcy Adams Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
kate lane Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Arianna Cart Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Mike Golder Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Matt BergdahlSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Maddie KirwanSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Sophie CanadySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Debbie GravesSanta cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Eduardo ToledoSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Jessica SomersSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Adela Puretz Santa Cruz 95060 US 3/7/2024
Aldo GIACCHINOSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Lisa Burdick Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Koa Collins Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
John Tinetti Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Megan DawsonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Lynn Alberti Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024

20.131
Tryntje YoungSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Roger BernsteinSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Ken Collins Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Margaret Liberatore Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
andrew bashawSanta Cruz 95060 Indonesia 3/7/2024
john knoll santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Isabela TerrazasSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Luis Miranda Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Lacie HirayamaSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Cristiano WillisSanta cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Riley PetersonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
shelby Leonardich Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Johana Cruz Esqueda Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Melanie LybrandSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Alexandr MillerSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Lorenzo CallaciSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Nina Berger Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Elizabeth GodoySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Brooke Bosinger Santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
cooper comstock Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Raji Fink Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Olivia Moore Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Zoe Ann WatsonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Samantha Wenger Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Antonia WilsonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Siena Koenig Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Caitlin Mullin Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Nohora Diaz Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Nate Smith Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Mia PedemonteSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Judy Cox Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Inez D'Souza Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Brody NewmanSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Manzanita AllenSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Chelle Catt Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Patrick HerrickSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Nicole BeddowSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Alexandra Gitomer Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
violet palmer Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Daniel Wojtowicz Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024
Nan Steward Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024

20.132
Fred Geiger Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Jesse Jacobs Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Christine Stelling Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Homer HenardSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Robin Cross Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Jessica GilholmSant cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Jennifer Goldbeck Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Noelle Baxter Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Elizabeth Farrar Mandranis Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024 Jim Ferguson Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Leslie Ingram Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Miriam HannaSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Aurora TershySanta cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Taly Strubing Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Bob FoxworthySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Cheyanne donald Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Jillian Gere Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Kyle HirayamaSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Nathan Bianchini Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
taylor timucinSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Liana Steller-Croll Santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Sophia Mandranis Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
lauren lazarottiSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Thomas Hamilton Sata Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Emma Rial Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Emma Sigala Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Healey SkeltonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Anita GrunwaldSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Denise Jones Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Alexa Starr Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Maureen Niehaus Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Grace SchiebelSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Kees van der Meer Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Robyn Lee Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
sage rodger Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Maddie McGrath Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Amy Hedberg Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Riley Auble Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Joe Moses Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Julie Miritz Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Sterling JacksonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024

20.133
Benjamin EvertSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Leo Gutierrez Santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Dallis Kidd Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Chloe Prior Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Peyton Westjohn Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Victoria Zumaya Long Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Caitlyn LeBlancSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Matt Becker Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Bruce Dykaar Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Virginia DykaarSanta cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Smaranda’s Proca Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Rush BolenderSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Matisse SaleriSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Susan MartinezSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Story CholdenSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Noah Hester Santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Maura Devlin-Buchinski Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Jenna LucchesiSanta cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Garrett FisherSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Irie Butler Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
shasta butler Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Olive Beck-watts Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Benji FarquharSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
claire campbellSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Peter Davis Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Matthew Mitchell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Kaylah BelvoirSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Joseph HutsonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Andrea Plascencia Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Ozzy Palacio Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Gillian GreensiteSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Joseph JacobsSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Brent EdwardsSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Makaela Beckwith Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Macie Sturm Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Ignacio Lopez Riverside CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
H Dowling Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
eugene panelliSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Alysha GreshamSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Kit Larter Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Ameyalli JuarezSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024

20.134
ann e. rauen Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Mark SamuelsonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Lee Taiz Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Anne MurphySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
Luke Tanguay Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024
robert backertSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
ava mcmahonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Valeria Avila Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Lori Arena Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Russell SmythSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Zoe Watson Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Dan Jones Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Hailey BranaganSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Jane Forbes Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Elijah Hunter Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
ava pedregon Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Joanne HutsonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Jennifer HutsonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Danny CortazzoSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Heather Cortazzo Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Max Brinegar Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Steven PappasSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Angel CamarenaSnta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
danielle henrySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Isla Hawkins Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Roxanna Star Santa cruz OR 95060 US 3/9/2024
Sunny McFadden Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Jessie Lopez Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Carolyn Hill Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Marisa Valdezschmidt Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
ayanna palmerSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Abby AndersonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Lindsey WadeSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Jacqueline Gouge Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Max Homel Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/9/2024
Judy Ward Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Maria Neeley Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Karen Mokrzycki Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Terra Hangen Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Lena Dreszer Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Raman Virk Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024

20.135
Martha CollinsSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Carmel BabichSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Carol Hanna Hanna Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Carol Epstein Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Brynne HobergSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Douglas Hellinger Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Debby Ham Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Christine SwanSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Val Leoffler Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/10/2024
Jason GingerySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Becky Cooper Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Forrest Hollingsworth Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Colby Steven'sSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
John Slebir Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Dylan Loquist Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Josh Hilger Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Jon Gilbert Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Catherine Nguyen Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
James Crutchfield Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Sean Hyslop Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Kevin Walsh Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
ISABELLE BRIGHTMAN Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Sean Feeney Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Andrew Hartmann Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Phoenix Rose Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Jack Snyder Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Britten Miles Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Ron Whittle Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Traci Whittle Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Justin KraemerSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Kirsten Pohlmann Sata Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
clayton burnamSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Lukas Shaw Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Jackie MullarkySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Annaleah Fraser Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Alice Shaw Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Sarah Tuosto Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Diane LeonardSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Aimee ManganSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Sarah Dahel Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Nathan WestrupSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024

20.136
Todd AndersonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Dustin TorchioSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Sharon Agorastos Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Perry Pollard Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Nathan HenrySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Brenda MartinSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Jim Mekis Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Tanmay MittalSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Steve Tracy Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Jared Basye Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Ali Pierson Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Jessica Hilger Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Brody RobbinsSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Oystein SaeboSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Karen Magranet Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Bob GoldbeckSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Julie Phillips Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Cynthia HilgerSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Emanuel KesterSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
Kelly Yurasek santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024
David Hooks Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Kathleen Kalahiki Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Lisa Bagnall Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Maria Cole Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Anne Elder Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Darci Hodder Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Lauren Cloar Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Aaron Garcia Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Judy Baldwin Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Don Iglesias Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Cathy StefankiSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Madhavi NaikSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Gabrielle SallesSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Adela GuerreroSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Elizabeth ZueckSnoqualmie CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Jeff MCcrackenSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Casey Smith Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Roger VortmanSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Erick Becerril Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Zinnia Hutchinson Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Jake Wormhoudt Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024

20.137
Jill Simmons Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Colleen Clark Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
James KreppelSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Dyan Welch Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
tam welch SANTA CRUZ CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Sean Meyer Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Gregory LewisSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Rob Wills Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Annette Kypreos Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Ashley FrenchSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Susan M Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/12/2024
Megan Nutt Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/13/2024
Kevin MurphySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/13/2024
Linda Harris Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/13/2024
Marjorie Way Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/13/2024
ellen sevy santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/13/2024
Hovita JohnsonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/13/2024
Paul Gabriel Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/13/2024
Mary Anne Gabay Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/13/2024
Va Draper Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/13/2024
Joseph Papa Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/13/2024
Mark. GillbertSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Matthew QuinnSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Karen Blight Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Steve Belcher Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Michael HansonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Sisi Belcher Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Tim Henton Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Donna Sarkes Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Scott SimmonsSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
David Cox Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Janet Windt Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Jeffey AndersonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Amy Bissell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
kathy goldmanSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Garrett PhilippSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Brenton KranichSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024
Judith Allan Brothers Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/15/2024
Tyerell NewtonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/15/2024
Kira Bissell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/15/2024
Melanie Vizzusi Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/15/2024

20.138
Jeffrey Ferrell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/15/2024
Rosemari Reimers-Rice Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/16/2024
Ulisses Terriquez Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/17/2024
Frank Barron Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/17/2024
Stephen Pasquini Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/18/2024
Bob Pearson Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/18/2024
Josefina O’SheaSacramento CA 95060 US 3/18/2024
Violy Burns Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/19/2024
Audrey Cornwell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/19/2024
Leighann CurciSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/19/2024
Rosalyn Chatt Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/19/2024
Ronald ForsytheSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/20/2024
Patti Kelley Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/22/2024
Kathleen Gleitsmann Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/23/2024
Hannah HamilSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/24/2024
Cole Wilson Santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/24/2024
Cambria KratenSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/27/2024
Kieran O’LearySanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/27/2024
D. Go Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/27/2024
Stephanie Pillars Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/27/2024
Kathy Ready Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/28/2024
Mallory Mae Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/30/2024
Diane Preite Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 4/3/2024
Troy Virostko Santa Cruz 95060 US 4/4/2024
Marilyn TrimbleSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 4/4/2024
Stephen Virostko Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 4/5/2024
Clarke ShultesSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 4/5/2024
Cathleen Shultes Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 4/5/2024
Lise Getoor Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 4/6/2024
Lori Marquez Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 4/6/2024
Pam AckermanSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 4/6/2024
Gabriela Arredondo Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 4/6/2024
Colleen BowmanSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 4/6/2024
Jonathan Bowman Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 4/6/2024
Vera Brown Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 4/6/2024
Terry Reed Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 4/7/2024
margaret dalbesio Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 4/7/2024
Kilpatrick BrianSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/4/2024
Ramiro GarciaSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/4/2024
Ronald Goad Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/4/2024
Karla Oliveira Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/4/2024

20.139
Stanley Prolo Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/4/2024
Stephanie Dekking Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/4/2024
Michael LauferSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/5/2024
Elai dankner Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/5/2024
Jens Williford Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/5/2024
Mark Agnello Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/5/2024
Ryan CaponigroSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/5/2024
Kelley SolbergSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/5/2024
graydon ross Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/5/2024
Don waddell Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/5/2024
Leta Vandenheuvel Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/5/2024
Peg Foster Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/5/2024
Brian Spear Salinas CA 95062 US 3/5/2024
Paula FeinbergSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/5/2024
Jerome WallaceSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/5/2024
Layla Hollingsworth Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Kirk Bierach Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Jim Koenig Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Bethany GarciaSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Jesse Corona Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
David Gray Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Kt Borch Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Jennifer GrahamSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Nora Lopez Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Elizabeth Sanoff Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Jessica MonteiroSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Theresa PerrySanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Mary MastersSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Aislyn WeinfeldSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Virginia Vazquez Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Sue Helm Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Terri Warden Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Autumn Hays Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Cooper WhiteSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Nicholas Sanchez Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Carolyn SouthSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Chris Wagner-Jauregg Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Nicholas LynnSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Scott Lupo Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Nico Hilger Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Cortland Peterson Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024

20.140
Ella Harley Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Jesse Reid Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Emily Mason Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Carly Wilson Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Samantha Henton Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Michaela Thornton Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Derek Myers Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Rachel Farris Aptos CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Agostino Sargenti Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Brad Fox Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Sierra Wallen Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Kyla Young Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Kinan Acosta-Marquez Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Xander Mehl Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Lisa Cabral Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Patricia Ryan Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Alicia Davis Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Dan Beckman Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Nohemi Kawasaki Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Santiago Hart Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
John McKelveySanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Daniel Kingsbook Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Carson Adam Santa Crus CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Leo Isla Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Emily MorganSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Charles RidgwaySanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Jenny Oneto Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Bryan Larson Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Garret Licon Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Louis Barnes JrSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Jason Hdez Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Hudson Black Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Shannon MahonSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Mara Palandrani Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Lindsey Bosshard Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Al Rose Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Renn RobinsonSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Tyler Sled Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Kathryn JurackaSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Ayla Paratore Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Pat Elliott Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024

20.141
Naomi Harris Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Mark GuluarteSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Amanda Mcknight Sana Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Joseph DwyerSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Brendan KlaverSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
savv v Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024
Tamara NorrisSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Adam ReplogleSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Kaiya Evans Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Casey Davis Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Jax Huckle Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Nancy Brown Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Aloe Driscoll Fremont CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Brooke Travissanta cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Hannah HerringSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Kyla JubinvilleSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Hannah CardozaSnta cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Preslley Replogle Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Kaitlin Hunsaker Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Liam Spirer Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Reed Ellis Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Maaya HensmanSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Mireya GomezSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Fletcher Cranston Sata Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
ryanna florez Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Sofia Hernandez Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Mirian Chi Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Mia Lavelle Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Kaylee HowserSanta Cruz OR 95062 US 3/7/2024
Dashiell Hart Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Mckay Eyre Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Michael Matthes Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Trevor MartinSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Keanna MillerSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Lucas Garthwaite Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Rohnan O’Riordan Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Gervis Ochoa Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Lexie Noble Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Noah Cole Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Ariana Castro Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
jayden johnsonSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024

20.142
Christiane dos Santos Tamarindo CA 95062 Costa Rica 3/7/2024 Abigail Shi Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Marc Bartlett Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Julian Sekon Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
simeon ratliff santa cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Bobby Sporl Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Kathy CrockerSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Connor Tracy Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Chloe Das Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Kiley Vogel Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Greg Martin Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Christina Agnone Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Kyle Jouras Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Benjamin Pinksanta cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Jocelyn MorenoSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Graeme TanakaSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Sierra Jones Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Brian HamiltonSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Shawn Yanez Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Charlie BrighamSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Anthony Castaneda Sant Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Chris Husted Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Alex Siu Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Wyatt BarrabeeSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Reef Bennett Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Kevin Lewis Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Brooke Bond Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Dusty Alreck Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Lindsay StoverSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Jacqui FreggerSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Aimee HambySanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
joe nama Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Izzy Olson Sanford Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
chris manss Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Delaney PucelikSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Kianna KimuraSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Chris Aluffi Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Amy Jensen Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Lola EvenhouseSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Kente Dorsey Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Brianna CortesSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024

20.143
Nora Smith Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Ruby HammerSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Andrew Whitmeyer Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Alli McGuffey Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Dakota OsborneSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Evan BomangoSanta cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
alyssa g santa cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Chelsea HarmanSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Ella Konishi Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Jack Hays Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Ernest Brown Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
ava wade Santa cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Josh b Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Kalani Riveira Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Taylor Capozziello Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Alyssa Larsen Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Dakotah Johnson Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Irma Vega Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Vijay Kamath Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Miles Holmes Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Briana Cox Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
M Nicholson Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Emma Welch Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Daniel Kent Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Kyle Palma Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024
Pam Swain Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Joshua MulcoySanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Ellis Conover Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
ytzel chavez Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
MaryJane DowSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Krista Canton Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
David Moore Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Dokken Boyd Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Quinn SandbergSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
dee hooker Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Ria DhamejaniSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Tyler ClevelandSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Mackenzie Gomes Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Justin Burns Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Melayna LopezSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Pilar Milot Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024

20.144
gabriela ruelasSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
ayla hymes Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Maya Stryker Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Tisha Briscoe Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Merrick Gonzales Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Alexis Mathis Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Thomas PhamSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Joann PedrozaSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Sofia Carlos Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Anaia CM Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Nayeli Serna Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Natalie SalernoSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
hannah martellSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Ella McGuire Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Julie Miritz Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
mason lange Santa cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Ava Lord Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Luke JohnstonSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Olivia RobinsonSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Emma BarsantiSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Austin Reed Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Chris Hosmer Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
kiki burke Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Irene Miller Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Andrea Mura Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Jacob MontoyaSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Denise LawsonSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Emi Roberts Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Larkin WarnekeSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Katy FarquharSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Elleotte Hart San Jose CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Ella Kuechle Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Brandon Leonardich Leonardich Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024 Temujin KuechleSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Barney Langner Jr. Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Kylie Bauer Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Nayeli Dorf-Cardenas Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Maya Howse Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
ella douglas Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Sasha Harper Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024
Sofia Rosas Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024

20.145
Makenna McIntyre santa cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
Ava DarbonneSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
Naia Cantor-Baker Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
Autumn ParksSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
Grey Flores Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
ashby weeks Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
naomi krull Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
Nolan Crane Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
Kat Fanni Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
Hannah YanniSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
ava gray Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
Christina LarsonSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
Cory hansen Cory hansen Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024 Sidney Rose Mancini Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
Amelia Schelhorse Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
Vanessa MullinsSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024
Tina Johnson Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/10/2024
Julio Briceno Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/10/2024
Lorrie Palmos-Malley Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Julian DeLongSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Tanya MachnickSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Janiya SanchezSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Zack DonoghueSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Sienna PickardSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Emily TurnbullSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Evan MattiasenSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Sam PondolfinoSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Chris MaddoxSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Christina LoFranco Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
pete mungai Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
LORIANNE VIERRA Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Matt Kiernan Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Owen de CossySanta cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Nicki Clover Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Racheal MurphySanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Nikki Loehr Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Shayla HowserSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
John Waldorf Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Callie McLarenSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Trinity BarnardSanta cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Tim Grasso Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024

20.146
Gavin Haight Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Margaret NelsonSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Mike Mizer Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/11/2024
Olmeca GamboaSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/12/2024
Mike Bennett Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/12/2024
Niki Weller San Leandro CA 95062 US 3/12/2024
Tom Shields Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/12/2024
Arianna PadillaSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/12/2024
Manuel FerrerSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/12/2024
Maia Maltese Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/12/2024
Deva Kane Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/12/2024
Ana M Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/12/2024
Susan Husted Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/12/2024
Kris MachnickSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/12/2024
Ryan Myers Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/12/2024
Kit Sherman Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/12/2024
Margo Montgomery Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/13/2024
Colleen McNally-Murphy Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/13/2024 Linda HutchisonSanta cruz CA 95062 US 3/13/2024
Charlie Gonzalez Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/13/2024
Chris RodriguezSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/13/2024
Nancy ManningSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/14/2024
George McCombie Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/14/2024
Monica NevinSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/16/2024
Ruth StricklandSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/16/2024
Kelly Frank Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/18/2024
Daren toschi Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/18/2024
Jason Stuart Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/19/2024
Will D Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/21/2024
Leslie MaggettiSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/28/2024
Ty Prosser Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/30/2024
Vicki Guinn Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/30/2024
Emily CaballeroSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 4/1/2024
Pete FeurtadoSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 4/3/2024
Deborah ElstonSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 4/6/2024
Matthew Sorensen Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 4/7/2024
Lucas Grove Santa Cruz CA 95063 US 3/6/2024
Jason BordelonSanta cruz CA 95063 US 3/6/2024
Sofia K Santa Cruz CA 95064 US 3/6/2024
Jaden CastellonSanta Cruz CA 95064 US 3/6/2024
Luke Willis Santa Cruz CA 95064 US 3/7/2024

20.147
Ander Camps-McCaffrey Santa Cruz CA 95064 US 3/7/2024
Bridgid O’HaraSanta Cruz CA 95064 US 3/8/2024
Stacy PinkhamSanta Cruz CA 95065 US 3/5/2024
Tyler Trevor Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/6/2024
Mollie Brown Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/6/2024
Reed Smith Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/6/2024
Tina May Santa Cruz, CACA 95065 US 3/6/2024
adam price Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
Dahlia Hardin Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
aiyana Welch Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
Gonzo Gutierrez Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
Jerry Fusari Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
Thomas Neel Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
Cameron ClarkSanta Cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
Aliyah BowersSanta Cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
Mea Vasquez Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
Heather RitzmanSanta Cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
Stella Cottini Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
nova DeRooy Santa cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
Susan Smith Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
molly pisciottaSanta Cruz CA 95065 US 3/7/2024
Elizabeth PennySanta Cruz CA 95065 US 3/8/2024
Aumar DuryeaSanta Cruz CA 95065 US 3/8/2024
Anissa ChildersSanta Cruz CA 95065 US 3/8/2024
Biggs CameronRiverside CA 95065 US 3/8/2024
Allison Dandurand Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/8/2024
Ethan OkamuraSanta Cruz CA 95065 US 3/8/2024
Audrey Lambidakis Snta cruz CA 95065 US 3/8/2024
Isabella Manriquez Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/8/2024
Kaili Frey Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/9/2024
nick f Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/9/2024
Aurora Smith Santa cruz CA 95065 US 3/9/2024
Kathryn Buckholdt Sana Cruz CA 95065 US 3/11/2024
Joseph gallo Santa Cruz CA 95065 US 3/11/2024
Jessie Spears Santa cruz CA 95065 US 3/12/2024
logan osbornesanta cruz CA 95065 US 3/31/2024
Javaneh Soto Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/4/2024
Sara Kiesby Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/5/2024
Rebecca CefaluScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/5/2024
Lorna Torkos Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024
W Scott Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024

20.148
Steve Smith Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024
lauren shay Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024
T Rodgers Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024
Kassi Jo SchillingScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024
Ryan Inlow Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024
Germain CefaluScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024
Patrick Shaughnessy Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024
Eric Reyes Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024
Kelly Keane Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024
Michael Kirby Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024
Don DitlevsenScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Gurrett LeonardScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Bryanna Wagner Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
karly KamleiterScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Sean ReynoldsScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Jeremy Goodrich Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Grace Brown Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Ella Desmond Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Melina SinclairScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Ireland DanielsScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Lisa abel Santa Cruz CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
kayse martinovsky Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Cloe Hubbard Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Ryan Biaggi Santa Cruz CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Sara Martinovsky Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Holly BergersonScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Tim Degrasse Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Sophie O’RourkeScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Caroline OliverScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Alysa HarringtonScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Noa HirshbeinScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Sara Stroud Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
K D Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Joshua EarnestScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Sophia McPherson Sctts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
asha hudson Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Haanya AkhtarScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Laura Quick Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Julia Hunter Santa Cruz CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Ryan Linn Santa Cruz CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Terri Bullock Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024

20.149
kali mendez Scott’s Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Mercedes Lopez Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Betwixt Jones-Cruz Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Keira Miller Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Emma Kreer Scott’s Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Sadie AmadeoScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Michelle Swanson Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Alyssa RebbertScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024
Bryce JacobsenScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
kyla falcone Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Nelly Aquino Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Aurelia padillaScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Giuliana PeuseScott’s Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Elly Brennan Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Niccolo PetriniSanta cruz CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Chiara ChatfieldScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Nina G Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Maya Bensen Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Juliette McLaughlin Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Jacob Brazil Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Parker Hite Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
shelby chace Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Laura RockowScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Matty Taylor-Saba Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Braiden Bennett Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Kaylee Marsh Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Sydney BarnesScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
David Collins Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Brandi Henderson Scotts valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Kalea Bright Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Max Moznett Santa Cruz CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Thalia Garcia Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Amber Green Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
clarissa osorioScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024
Nathalie Dion Scott’s valley CA 95066 US 3/9/2024
Kelly Rainey Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/9/2024
Hans havemanScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/9/2024
Zachery Hill Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/9/2024
Lars Gilbert Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/10/2024
Eric SchottgenScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/11/2024
Maddy WhittleScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/11/2024

20.150
Kayle RoesnerScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/11/2024
Laura WaldorfScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/11/2024
Dennis WilsonScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/11/2024
Faith MacDonald Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/12/2024
Stevie Dean Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/12/2024
Mark Chambers-Bray Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/13/2024
Carol Culp Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/13/2024
Jon Hanson Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/13/2024
Daisy Baxter Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/14/2024
Kevin Barnett Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/20/2024
Sharlene AmesScotts Valley CA 95066 US 4/1/2024
Jahmai DouyonSanta Cruz CA 95069 US 3/6/2024
Bo Lopez Santa Cruz CA 95073 US 3/6/2024
Marcos Gandulfo Soquel CA 95073 US 3/6/2024
Anna Hattis Soquel CA 95073 US 3/6/2024
Madalyn PriceSoquel CA 95073 US 3/6/2024
Richard BradySoquel GA 95073 US 3/6/2024
Sean Horton Soquel CA 95073 US 3/6/2024
Emma Dilloughery Soquel CA 95073 US 3/6/2024
David Goss Soquel CA 95073 US 3/7/2024
Jason Merrell Soquel CA 95073 US 3/7/2024
Lauren Winterburn santa cruz CA 95073 US 3/7/2024
Jenny Chiaramonte Soquel CA 95073 US 3/7/2024
Lexy Benitez-Fanslow Soquel CA 95073 US 3/7/2024
Zac Proctor Soquel 95073 US 3/7/2024
Maddy Couvillion Santa Cruz CA 95073 US 3/8/2024
sage kelly Soquel CA 95073 US 3/8/2024
Makiah Dexel Soquel CA 95073 US 3/8/2024
karsta jensen Soquel CA 95073 US 3/8/2024
Vicki Dodson Soquel CA 95073 US 3/8/2024
Mikaela Minoggi Soquel CA 95073 US 3/8/2024
thea luini soquel CA 95073 US 3/8/2024
Jon Olson Soquel CA 95073 US 3/11/2024
Michael ThornWatsonville CA 95076 US 3/4/2024
Rachel Thorn Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/4/2024
Natascha Roberts Santa Cruz CA 95076 US 3/6/2024
John Ferreira Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/6/2024
Craig Grant Corralitos CA 95076 US 3/6/2024
Ron Miller LaSelva BeachCA 95076 US 3/6/2024
Michael CastroWatsonville CA 95076 US 3/6/2024
leilani yasin Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/6/2024

20.151
Andrea MerrillWatsonville CA 95076 US 3/6/2024
William Locke-Paddon Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/6/2024
Jason Tovani Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/6/2024
Mark BojorquezWatsonville CA 95076 US 3/6/2024
Tom Regan Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Deanna AlexisWatsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Jason HackforthWatsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Al Pa Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Tim Lochner Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Matt Barraza Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Ja La Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Beatrice L Watsomville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Michelle FluentWatsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Jacqueline LeighWatsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Kayln Pascal Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Jessi Parra Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Jas M Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Michelle Ellis Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Cayla FedermanWatsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Sarah Pizarro Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024
Karl Bischoff Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/8/2024
Eve Nichols Santa Cruz CA 95076 US 3/8/2024
Daniela Villarreal Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/8/2024
Anthony Macedo Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/8/2024
Simon Silver Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/8/2024
Amber Roccaforte Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/8/2024
marianna mendez Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/8/2024
mariana Figueroa Wtsonville CA 95076 US 3/9/2024
Caleb Torres Santa Cruz CA 95076 US 3/9/2024
Cheryl Ganly Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/9/2024
Samantha Fox Settler Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/11/2024
Ricky Parra Sr Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/11/2024
Lance LubarsyWatsonville CA 95076 US 3/11/2024
Lacey Dent Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/12/2024
Rebecca WalkerWatsonville CA 95076 US 3/12/2024
Emily Suarez Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/12/2024
TOM ABBOTT Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/19/2024
Logan McCollumAromas CA 95076 US 3/19/2024
Vivian LondonSanta Cruz CA 95090 US 3/8/2024
Thomas SakodaSan Jose CA 95110 US 3/11/2024
Brad Davies San Jose CA 95112 US 3/6/2024

20.152
Bryan Hallett San Jose CA 95112 US 3/7/2024
alyssa FlowersSan Jose CA 95112 US 3/7/2024
Mary Morici San Jose CA 95112 US 3/7/2024
Evi Miller San Jose CA 95112 US 3/8/2024
Patty JimenesSan Jose CA 95116 US 3/6/2024
Joe Gregory San Jose CA 95116 US 3/6/2024
audrey baxtersanta cruz CA 95116 US 3/7/2024
Milo Muniz San Jose CA 95116 US 3/7/2024
Emma Faszer San Jose CA 95116 US 3/8/2024
Kala Foster San Jose CA 95116 US 3/27/2024
Sophie Feduk San Jose CA 95117 US 3/7/2024
Mark Jansen San Jose CA 95117 US 3/8/2024
Steven VaughnSan Jose CA 95118 US 3/6/2024
Natalie Lopez San Jose CA 95119 US 3/7/2024
Deborah Lauriguet-Kolar San Jose CA 95119 US 3/12/2024
Devina QueenSan Jose CA 95120 US 3/9/2024
Cody MattsonSan jose CA 95121 US 3/14/2024
Jaquelin Magdaleno San Jose CA 95122 US 3/7/2024
Brett Melton San Jose CA 95123 US 3/7/2024
Elise Rockey Santa Cruz CA 95123 US 3/8/2024
William AnallaSan Jose CA 95123 US 3/12/2024
Holly Riley-Davis San Jose CA 95123 US 3/12/2024
AmY Green San Jose CA 95124 US 3/5/2024
Christian Cipollini San Jose CA 95124 US 3/5/2024
Sammy Cai San Jose CA 95124 US 3/6/2024
Bradley DouglasSan Jose CA 95124 US 3/7/2024
Megan Hightower San Jose CA 95124 US 3/7/2024
Chris Marr San Jose CA 95125 US 3/7/2024
Cece Giguere San Jose CA 95125 US 3/8/2024
Emily Hill San Jose CA 95125 US 3/8/2024
Sarah ConwaySan Jose CA 95125 US 3/11/2024
Ian Babcock San Jose CA 95126 US 3/4/2024
Lisa Azalea San Jose CA 95126 US 3/5/2024
Maria AguirreSan Jose CA 95126 US 3/6/2024
Tyler Martin San Jose CA 95126 US 3/6/2024
Bracken Christopher San Jose CA 95126 US 3/6/2024
Cody MorrisonSan Jose CA 95126 US 3/6/2024
Lucas sousa San Jose CA 95126 US 3/7/2024
Angie DillmanSan Jose CA 95126 US 3/7/2024
Lukas MurphySan Jose CA 95126 US 3/7/2024
Ezra Cohen San Jose CA 95126 US 3/7/2024

20.153
Candi Walker San Jose CA 95126 US 3/7/2024
Christina GattiSan Jose CA 95126 US 3/8/2024
Rodney WalchaSan Jose CA 95126 US 3/8/2024
Gwynne Corrigan San Jose CA 95126 US 3/10/2024
Jake Fusari San Jose CA 95127 US 3/6/2024
Noah MccellonSan Jose CA 95127 US 3/7/2024
Amelia Price San Jose CA 95127 US 3/8/2024
DESTANEE FREITAS San Jose CA 95127 US 3/10/2024
Pedro Henrique Cruz Lehner San Jose CA 95127 US 3/11/2024 Cam White San Jose CA 95127 US 3/11/2024
Brett Srange San Jose CA 95128 US 3/4/2024
Brent Elder San Jose CA 95129 US 3/6/2024
Ulysses Gutierrez San Jose CA 95129 US 3/6/2024
Christy Dally Santa Cruz CA 95129 US 3/27/2024
kaiana hardingSan Jose CA 95131 US 3/6/2024
Shannon Shaffer San Jose CA 95131 US 3/6/2024
Alena karagiannopoulos Santa Cruz CA 95131 US 3/6/2024
Jalen Porter San Jose CA 95131 US 3/6/2024
James RivelandSan Jose CA 95131 US 3/7/2024
Shannon LoilerSan Jose CA 95131 US 3/7/2024
leila roh San Jose CA 95131 US 3/7/2024
Melanie CorrellSan Jose CA 95131 US 3/8/2024
Nat Young San Jose CA 95132 US 3/5/2024
Perry Kent San Jose CA 95132 US 3/15/2024
Josie Warren San Jose CA 95133 US 3/6/2024
Tom Johnson San Jose CA 95133 US 3/11/2024
Evan jordan San Jose CA 95134 US 3/6/2024
Stephanie FelixSan Jose CA 95134 US 3/7/2024
Michael Martinez San Jose CA 95134 US 3/7/2024
naomi maxwellSanta Cruz CA 95134 US 3/7/2024
Ellen Durst San Jose CA 95134 US 3/7/2024
Braden BrooksSan Jose CA 95134 US 3/7/2024
Aaron SimpsonSan Jose CA 95134 US 3/7/2024
Amy DeMartiniSan Jose CA 95134 US 3/7/2024
Logan Bodi San Jose CA 95134 US 3/8/2024
Jonathan VillarSan Jose CA 95134 US 3/8/2024
Freya MagnanteSan Jose CA 95134 US 3/8/2024
Vicki Robles San Jose CA 95135 US 3/7/2024
manika brockenbrough San Jose CA 95138 US 3/9/2024
Laura-Lee Feurtado San Jose CA 95141 US 3/27/2024
Azucena Gonzalez San Jose CA 95148 US 3/7/2024

20.154
Christina Cafarelli San Jose CA 95148 US 3/17/2024
Maly Xiong Stockton CA 95209 US 3/30/2024
Angela ScalphDenair CA 95316 US 3/6/2024
Douglas RidgleyGroveland CA 95321 US 3/6/2024
diane bouley La Grange CA 95329 US 3/7/2024
Kim Richards Mariposa CA 95338 US 3/14/2024
Ashley Wolfe Modesto CA 95351 US 3/7/2024
sierra arnett Modesto CA 95351 US 3/7/2024
Brindley Barchas Modesto CA 95351 US 3/8/2024
Scott Guthrie Modesto CA 95356 US 3/11/2024
Aimee GuthrieModesto CA 95356 US 3/11/2024
David MetzgerPatterson CA 95363 US 3/7/2024
Gio L Riverbank CA 95367 US 3/31/2024
Peter Pfotenhauer Pfotenhauer Snelling CA 95369 US 3/7/2024 Taylor Burns Sonora CA 95370 US 3/8/2024
Tom Ralston Mountain HouseCA 95391 US 3/14/2024
Bryon O’Neal Santa Rosa CA 95401 US 3/7/2024
Kyriea GiegerichSanta Rosa CA 95407 US 3/8/2024
Aki Ransome Forestville CA 95436 US 3/14/2024
Joaquin Sherman Point Arena CA 95468 US 3/6/2024
Ashraya RiggioSanta Cruz CA 95472 US 3/7/2024
Regina Rollin Sonoma CA 95476 US 3/7/2024
Phillip HooverWillits CA 95490 US 3/8/2024
Jacob AguileraEureka CA 95501 US 3/8/2024
Christopher Davis Eureka CA 95501 US 3/9/2024
Mason RothmanEureka CA 95503 US 3/6/2024
Skyler Nilsen Eureka CA 95503 US 3/7/2024
Jessica hill-roddick Arata CA 95521 US 3/7/2024
Joiya Ford Arcata CA 95521 US 3/12/2024
Natalie AcunaSanta Cruz CA 95602 US 3/7/2024
Jacquelyn EarleyCarmichael CA 95608 US 3/11/2024
Timothy SmithCarmichael CA 95608 US 3/11/2024
Daya Noel Davis CA 95616 US 3/7/2024
Ed Kinney Fair Oaks CA 95628 US 3/11/2024
Drew Reid Folsom CA 95630 US 3/6/2024
Josie Wilson Folsom CA 95630 US 3/7/2024
Denise OwingsLincoln CA 95648 US 3/6/2024
Ned Simpson Rocklin CA 95677 US 3/5/2024
Lucas BroskeyRocklin CA 95677 US 3/6/2024
Courtney Owings Rocklin CA 95677 US 3/6/2024
Alex Zazueta Roseville CA 95678 US 3/9/2024

20.155
Lexie Shanks Sutter Creek CA 95685 US 3/7/2024
Tracey Evans Sacramento CA 95817 US 3/13/2024
Amanda PolissoSacramento CA 95817 US 3/14/2024
Joseph Gonzales Sacramento CA 95818 US 3/8/2024
Van Clow Sacramento CA 95819 US 3/8/2024
Shirley Liu Sacramento CA 95819 US 3/9/2024
Dave HerndonCapitola CA 95821 US 3/6/2024
Jeremy SpencerSacramento CA 95822 US 3/7/2024
Omar RamirezSacramento CA 95823 US 3/10/2024
Sean Byram Sacramento CA 95823 US 3/11/2024
Joe De Meo Sacramento CA 95825 US 3/6/2024
Paulina Reinoldson Sacramento CA 95825 US 3/7/2024
nina schmidt Sacramento CA 95825 US 3/7/2024
Luke Shellen Sacramento CA 95825 US 3/7/2024
Cooper Marquez Sacramento CA 95825 US 3/7/2024
jackie baires Sacramento CA 95825 US 3/7/2024
Annie Moon Sacramento CA 95825 US 3/8/2024
Makayla Schneider Santa Cruz CA 95825 US 3/8/2024
Clara Weaver Sacramento CA 95825 US 3/8/2024
Juan Lara Sacramento CA 95825 US 3/8/2024
Annouschka Collins Sacramento CA 95827 US 3/7/2024
George ClampSacramento CA 95838 US 3/4/2024
Matt Simas Sacramento CA 95864 US 3/6/2024
Jude Carabetta-Goncalves Sacramento CA 95864 US 3/7/2024 Colleen Fitzpatrick Chico CA 95926 US 3/7/2024
Madeline Heitman Grass Valley CA 95949 US 3/8/2024
August DavidsonNevada City CA 95959 US 3/19/2024
Rodney TaylorSanta Cruz CA 95960 US 3/6/2024
Pete Rode Santa Cruz CA 95960 US 3/8/2024
Richard Minkner Chico CA 95973 US 3/8/2024
collin wolff chico CA 95988 US 3/21/2024
Mark Glendinning Yuba City CA 95991 US 3/7/2024
Lily Stinson Santa Cruz CA 96050 US 3/8/2024
Naiya Samios-McQuain Santa Cruz CA 96060 US 3/8/2024
Jamie Carucci Green Santa Cruz CA 96062 US 3/27/2024
Jen Nicol Red Bluff CA 96080 US 3/28/2024
Eli Ledwith South Lake Tahoe CA 96150 US 3/7/2024
Casey White South Lake Tahoe CA 96150 US 3/7/2024
Brian Carlson Truckee CA 96161 US 3/6/2024
Skip & Keiko Armstrong Haiku HI 96708 US 3/7/2024
Karen GallagherHaleiwa HI 96712 US 3/8/2024

20.156
David Jay Haleiwa HI 96712 US 3/27/2024
Cathie JenkinsKaneohe HI 96744 US 3/13/2024
barton harperKapaa HI 96746 US 3/6/2024
Tatiana AlvaradoKapaa HI 96746 US 3/6/2024
Sochi HendersonKihei HI 96753 US 3/11/2024
Angela MorelliLahaina HI 96761 US 3/8/2024
Jaxson DuncanNaalehu HI 96772 US 3/8/2024
Libby forrest Wahiawa HI 96786 US 3/7/2024
Rick Brooke Waialua HI 96789 US 3/9/2024
Devin MurphyHonolulu HI 96816 US 3/7/2024
Maya Gipson Honolulu HI 96816 US 3/7/2024
Janet Barnes Honolulu HI 96816 US 3/12/2024
Brian Cope Honolulu HI 96817 US 3/7/2024
Charles WhiteHonolulu HI 96817 US 3/9/2024
David Gonsalves Honolulu HI 96819 US 3/11/2024
Naomi ForemanHonolulu HI 96822 US 3/6/2024
Ben Kohmescher Welches OR 97067 US 3/7/2024
Justin Buford Cloverdale OR 97112 US 3/8/2024
Madison Snyder Forest Grove OR 97116 US 3/11/2024
Aidan Shoote Portland OR 97202 US 3/30/2024
Fiona McDonough Portland OR 97203 US 3/7/2024
Jeffrey Sweet Portland OR 97203 US 3/7/2024
Geoff McCormack Portland OR 97217 US 3/7/2024
Julie Christopher Portland OR 97231 US 4/2/2024
David Merritt Portland OR 97266 US 3/6/2024
Grace Shipp Salem OR 97301 US 3/8/2024
Lindsay BryanCorvallis OR 97330 US 3/6/2024
kalindi dydo Corvallis OR 97330 US 3/7/2024
Axl Harila Halsey OR 97348 US 4/4/2024
Claudia NiemanLebanon OR 97355 US 3/8/2024
Kim Schlotterbeck Eugene OR 97402 US 3/7/2024
Sara Bowin Eugene OR 97403 US 3/7/2024
Vivian TousseauEugene OR 97404 US 3/13/2024
Joseph PrudellSoquel CA 97408 US 3/8/2024
Eric Lucas Springfield OR 97477 US 3/4/2024
Neil Rose Medford OR 97504 US 3/11/2024
Amanda Bertuccelli Ashand OR 97520 US 3/10/2024
Rachael Rodriguez Eagle Point OR 97524 US 3/5/2024
Gary COOPER Shady Cove OR 97539 US 3/4/2024
Hayden LarsenBend OR 97701 US 3/12/2024
Anais AndrewsBend OR 97702 US 3/6/2024

20.157
Cheryl GallegosOR OR 97760 US 4/2/2024
Patrick Perry Federal Way WA 98023 US 3/11/2024
emily strassmanSeattle WA 98105 US 3/7/2024
Zachary Ceballos Seattle WA 98117 US 3/13/2024
Sydney ManierSeattle WA 98160 US 3/26/2024
Paula Celeste Seattle WA 98237 US 3/18/2024
Talon SorensenBonney Lake WA 98391 US 3/8/2024
Jason ForouharOlympia WA 98501 US 4/5/2024
Deanna Wiederhold Vancouver WA 98662 US 3/10/2024
Jessica Lunceford Woodland WA 98674 US 3/15/2024
Jennica DownerSpokane WA 99203 US 3/8/2024
Mimi Pepper Day Seattle WA 99212 US 3/7/2024
Jordyn Cane Aptos CA 9501795003 US 3/11/2024
Janet DuBeauIrmo SC 29063-2048 US 3/8/2024
David CronwallSanta Cruz CA 95060-6237 US 3/11/2024
Sami Elward Santa Cruz CA 9506o US 3/7/2024
Joshua CurpheyPeterborough PE7 US 3/6/2024
Shane SkeltonSanta Cruz CA US 3/2/2024
Lillian Nemiroff US 3/5/2024
georgia jones Guernsey 3/7/2024
Olivia Dabrowski Lebanon MO US 3/11/2024
Betty Casteel Santa Cruz CA US 3/11/2024
AUSTIN SMITH MI US 3/13/2024
Andrew Floyd US 3/15/2024
Jesse Faries US 3/16/2024
Taylor Ure US 3/21/2024
Carly Lakes US 3/22/2024
Marty DworkisNew York NY US 3/23/2024
b h TX US 3/24/2024
Sean Baker Los Angeles CA US 3/25/2024
Roxana Moya Santiago Chile 3/27/2024
Jeremiah Ronduelas US 3/29/2024
Dr Beverly Griffin PhD CA US 4/1/2024
Jowell Romero US 4/3/2024
Alexcy CayananPangasinan Philippines 4/4/2024
Kurt russell Pilar General Trias Philippines 4/4/2024
Wency Maestro Philippines 4/4/2024
Jovy Maestro Philippines 4/4/2024
Glyn Leones Balbin Ilocos sur Philippines 4/4/2024
Miguel PantonManila Philippines 4/5/2024
Ashley SumangGeneral Trias City Philippines 4/5/2024

20.158
Name City State Postal Code Country Commented Date Comment Corrina Dilloughery Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/4/2024 "The overflow traffic to neigh Stacy PinkhamSanta Cruz CA 95065 US 3/5/2024 "West Cliff Drive should NEVE Ivan Gavric Pacifica CA 94044 US 3/5/2024 "I love driving beautiful west c Anthony RuffoSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/5/2024 "going up Westcliff and comin Alex Viera Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/5/2024 "Keep tourist traffic out of the john aird Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024 "This is a spectacular drive in kathy reimer-pearson santa cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024 "One way traffic on Westcliff w Brad Bissell Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024 "Two way traffic will keep cars Jake Schafer Huntington NY 11743 US 3/6/2024 "Preserve west cliff" Steve Ragatz Livermore CA 94550 US 3/6/2024 "I like driving down the cliff" T Rodgers Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024 "I was born and raised here, 5 Caitlin GigliottiWatsonville CA 95076 US 3/6/2024 "One way traffic will impact th Steve Lovell Scotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/6/2024 "West Cliff needs to stay as a David Okeefe Los Angeles CA 90006 US 3/6/2024 "Keep traffic flowing not a inc Mike Attolico Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024 "To keep the car traffic out of West CLIFF Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024 "down the cliff? lol" Lilly Dickens Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024 "I live on the Westside and wa Shane Crosby Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024 "i want 2 way road" David Merritt Bend OR 97701 US 3/6/2024 "{"videoUrl":"https://custome Gabe BalassoneSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/6/2024 "First we had to teach tourists Garret Licon Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024 "Driving west cliff is one of the Anthony RuffoSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/6/2024 "{"videoUrl":"https://custome Sebastian Joseph San Diego CA 92111 US 3/6/2024 "Growing up on the west side Tina May Concord CA 94518 US 3/6/2024 "It was fine before. Let's keep George Workman US 3/6/2024 "This will create a traffic disas Jason Tovani Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/6/2024 "The down and back surf chec Jaquelin Magdaleno San Jose CA 95122 US 3/7/2024 "West Cliff drive should stay a Don DitlevsenScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/7/2024 "It should stay 2 lanes." Skye Holmes Felton CA 95018 US 3/7/2024 "I go to westcliff everyday and Jayda DoulingerBlair St CA 95018 US 3/7/2024 "I am at west cliff every day, a Kaitlyn Wave Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024 "i want to drive west cliff free Natasha GunionSan Francisco CA 94103 US 3/7/2024 "One lane is stupidddddddddd Keanna MillerSanta Cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024 "West cliff should stay a two w Jason HackforthWatsonville CA 95076 US 3/7/2024 "The fact that the residents liv mickey riciglianoFelton CA 95005 US 3/7/2024 "I’m a huge fan of west cliff, n Narayana Dawson Emeryville CA 94608 US 3/7/2024 "Waste of money" Brett Melton San Jose CA 95123 US 3/7/2024 "Because it is a magical drive" Jenny Chiaramonte Aptos CA 95003 US 3/7/2024 "Keep West Cliff a two-way ro greg martin santa cruz CA 95062 US 3/7/2024 "The Coastal Commission is re Keely Green Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024 "Wc is part of sc that should n

20.159
joanne lewis gilroy CA 95020 US 3/7/2024 "I live in Santa Cruz, and I don Tanner WalkerSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024 "West cliff should stay two lan Matt BergdahlSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024 "I'd like to maintain two way t Zac Proctor Soquel 95073 US 3/7/2024 "2 way is the only way" Adela Puretz Santa Cruz 95060 US 3/7/2024 "It will cause sooo much unne Megan DawsonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024 "West Cliff Drive provides two Luis Miranda Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/7/2024 "I lived in sc 4 years and it nee John Knoll Santa Cruz CA 95062-1852 US 3/7/2024 "Signing again at my Dad's req Jalyn Rich Sacramento CA 94203 US 3/7/2024 "I was born and raised in SC a Beverley PearceSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024 "Surf City and the world class Krista Canton Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/8/2024 "It has been a staple to drive o Etta Tyler Aptos CA 95003 US 3/8/2024 "I live nearby and have been v Jennifer Goldbeck Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024 "Santa Cruz does not have the Elise Rockey Santa Cruz CA 95123 US 3/8/2024 "Mission Street is already bog Jamison MaidenSeaside CA 93955 US 3/8/2024 "Cruising west cliff is a staple Elizabeth PennySanta Cruz CA 95065 US 3/8/2024 "I want to save westcliff!" Maureen Niehaus Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024 "I think we need to keep west Kim Stoner Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024 "West Cliff Drive is a DRIVE an Sterling JacksonSanta Monica CA 90406 US 3/8/2024 "{"videoUrl":"https://custome Laura RockowScotts Valley CA 95066 US 3/8/2024 "Absolutely keep 2 way!! This karsta jensen Soquel CA 95073 US 3/8/2024 "I want 2 lanes on Westcliff dr Adam Kagel Los Gatos CA 95030 US 3/8/2024 "I love the ability to drive bac Tess Reedy San Francisco CA 94114 US 3/8/2024 "I want to drive both ways" amber yale Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024 "what a really bad idea...this d eugene panelliSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024 "eugene panelli ( corky)" Lee Taiz Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/8/2024 "Lee Taiz Two way traffic will Makenna McIntyre santa cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024 "I agree! Theres no way to ma Tony CanadasMoss Beach CA 94038 US 3/9/2024 "We pay the Property Tax, We Cory Hansen Watsonville CA 95076 US 3/9/2024 "Since I was 16 I'd drive this ro Amelia Schelhorse Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/9/2024 "I want to continue appreciati Arnoldo Hernández Galván 68000 Mexico 3/9/2024 "You gotta keep the environm celeste frye Salinas CA 93908 US 3/10/2024 "Santa Cruz is a beautiful plac Elias Richter Long Beach NY 11561 US 3/11/2024 "There’s plenty of room for bi Sarah Dahel San Jose 95134 US 3/11/2024 "I live near west cliff and don’ Sochi HendersonKihei HI 96753 US 3/11/2024 "One way makes it much hard Julie Phillips Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/11/2024 "West Cliff Drive and Bay Stre tam welch SANTA CRUZ CA 95060 US 3/12/2024 "We need to keep beach acce Sheri Baxter Santa Cruz CA 95060 US 3/13/2024 "Cruising the cliffs is life. We r Jeffey AndersonSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024 "Providing more access for wa Garrett PhilippSanta Cruz CA 95060 US 3/14/2024 "I drive east mostly and live 3 Z Haas Pittsburgh 15212 US 3/27/2024 "Two way traffic is vital for res

20.160
Jamie Green Lahaina HI 96761 US 3/27/2024 "“The Cruz” is just that, keep Aaron EmersonDiamond pointNY 12824 US 3/28/2024 "Driving along West Cliff and w Julie Butler Sacramento CA 94230 US 3/29/2024 "I grew up on West Cliff" Vicki Guinn Santa Cruz CA 95062 US 3/30/2024 "I'm all in for two way car traf Pam AckermanScotts Valley CA 95066 US 4/6/2024 "Access is important for reside

20.161
he overflow traffic to neighborhoods would be terrible. Keep it the way it is. Remove a tweaker parking lot if needed." West Cliff Drive should NEVER be shut down to two-way traffic unless it becomes physically impossible to repair the erosion! T oing up Westcliff and coming back down. Westcliff has been a staple Santa Cruz forever. Two ways must one of the great thin his is a spectacular drive in Santa Cruz and the idea to restrict it to one way effectively limits the different views one would ge was born and raised here, 5th generation, and I’m tired of what we all knew and loved about SC disappearing and changing - n West Cliff needs to stay as a two way street to maintain its amazing views and relieve all of the traffic in the nearby streets." "videoUrl":"https://customer-g2wndu9j9b1p498o.cloudflarestream.com/bf4b8f339d07bc8f2430b8608e5d35cc/downloads/d irst we had to teach tourists about roundabouts and now one ways! What's next make them follow speed limits on Delaware! riving west cliff is one of the most relaxing things you can do. It sets the tone for the town and is a huge part of what makes th "videoUrl":"https://customer-g2wndu9j9b1p498o.cloudflarestream.com/b93cb274c83be542100253492c086dbe/downloads/ rowing up on the west side, West Cliff is a core part of life. I vote to have west Cliff stay a 2way street as it’s been. It’s never b he down and back surf check on West Cliff is one of the best in the world. Why would we want to change that to be lame like go to westcliff everyday and this would make it very hard to access and to get places I need to go plus it would ruin the vibe o am at west cliff every day, and it would be really sad if u could only drive it one way. I also feel like it would create so much mo want to drive west cliff freely, THIS IS AMERICA. also i walk there and there is plenty of room already!!!!!! xoxo" he fact that the residents living on Oxford and Alta have blocked their streets to through traffic should tell you everything you he Coastal Commission is responsible for pushing this onto the City and the City is accepting it. There’s an upcoming US Supre Wc is part of sc that should never be taken or changed .We're already dealing with all the new apartment housing and the met

20.162
West cliff should stay two lanes because it offers multiple ways to see the cliff and not have to drive all the way around just to d like to maintain two way traffic and avoid negatively impacting the immediate lower westside neighborhood" West Cliff Drive provides two completely different view experiences, depending on which direction you are traveling. Future tr igning again at my Dad's request ( He is 88, resident since 1945) . Traffic impact's his street bad without West Cliff open both urf City and the world class Steamer’s Lane should be left as is on a two way street. People who have no interest in surfing or has been a staple to drive on west cliff, sometimes I can’t stop for a walk. So being able to drive to work on it really is rejuven anta Cruz does not have the infrastructure to accommodate West Cliff becoming one-way. The current closure has demonstr Mission Street is already bogged down with traffic. With the temporary closure, drivers and weaving through all the neighborh ruising west cliff is a staple part of every time i come home to Santa Cruz. This last year has been so hard to have to go blocks West Cliff Drive is a DRIVE and an arterial connector street. It was accepted as a federal highway back in the 1920's by a former "videoUrl":"https://customer-g2wndu9j9b1p498o.cloudflarestream.com/2fc264b93884beddc91cc2540aced95d/downloads/d bsolutely keep 2 way!! This is a route I drive some elderly people who cannot walk and it’s the best part of their life !! (Mine, love the ability to drive back and forth on west cliff. Having to drive through the neighbors is inconvenient and a nuisance to t what a really bad idea...this drive was created a long time ago by people who planned ahead. Please keep it 2 ways it will be a o agree! Theres no way to make westcliff logical with only one lane. There will be an insane amount of folks going through neigh We pay the Property Tax, We pay the Sales Tax, We pay the Income Tax, We say REPAIR THE ROAD!" ince I was 16 I'd drive this route everyday to check the waves and recite how grateful I am to have a such a beautiful place as want to continue appreciating the beautiful scenery with out having to go wack ass ways to get there pls!" anta Cruz is a beautiful place and it should stay the way its always been. Taking two lanes away would be detrimental." here’s plenty of room for bikers and walkers already. Gonna cost a lot of money to change the road. If it ain’t broke don’t fix it West Cliff Drive and Bay Street intersection is already backed up during peak hours!! This pattern change will greatly impact th We need to keep beach access free and open to the public. As soon as you "limit" then only those who "can" pay can play." ruising the cliffs is life. We request car use, pedestrian and bike for the quality of life we all are accustomed to for our amity a roviding more access for walkers and cyclists is a noble aspiration, but in reality, West Cliff is used, and will continue to be use drive east mostly and live 3 blocks away. One-way would increase side street traffic a lot and cars are people too, sometimes wo way traffic is vital for residents of the westside to get to and from downtown. One way traffic would be a disaster for the r

20.163
The Cruz” is just that, keep it flowing both directions. No other route would benefit neighborhoods or drivers" riving along West Cliff and watching the sunset there with my girlfriend is my favorite memory of visiting Santa Cruz"

20.164
s must one of the great things we have in this town is being able to go up and down the cliff and enjoy the scenery both direct fferent views one would get in each direction. Additionally, it would sure seem that the impact of making it restricted to one sappearing and changing - not for the better. West Cliff needs to stay the way it’s always been" 8608e5d35cc/downloads/default.mp4","cloudflareUid":"bf4b8f339d07bc8f2430b8608e5d35cc"}" 53492c086dbe/downloads/default.mp4","cloudflareUid":"b93cb274c83be542100253492c086dbe"}" eet as it’s been. It’s never been a problem for anyone to get around and see the coastline easily. Walk bike drive whatever , w it would create so much more unnecessary traffic. Pls keep it the same. It is my favorite place ever" ould tell you everything you need to know about how that area feels about having West Cliff traffic diverted through that neig ere’s an upcoming US Supreme Court case that could restore property owners (including the City) rights to protect their prope tment housing and the metro being completely changed .. the traffic and tourists are going to completely ruin west cliff if it be

20.165
you are traveling. Future traffic plans MUST include vehicle lanes that provide the option to drive in either direction." ithout West Cliff open both directions: it's bad enough they ran a stop sign in 1972 and killed my cat 15 feet from me , don't le ve no interest in surfing or the beach life want to change it. We must fight for our rights against the poor decision makers who rrent closure has demonstrated huge negative impacts on safety and quality of life in the Westside neighborhoods as the thou g through all the neighborhoods trying to find a way through. Total neighborhood chaos. Keep West Cliff open 2 ways to save o hard to have to go blocks off the ocean to get around. Two way traffic should be a must in west cliff" ck in the 1920's by a former Mayor of Santa Cruz. At that time Delaware Ave. was a railroad track called the Ocean Shore RR a 2540aced95d/downloads/default.mp4","cloudflareUid":"2fc264b93884beddc91cc2540aced95d"}" hange will greatly impact this key intersection as well as throughout surrounding neighborhoods! It will add driving time for m ustomed to for our amity and serenity. Also cars on West Cliff are best for elders or people who may not be able to access We and will continue to be used, primarily by drivers. If people with cars can’t use West Cliff for two way traffic and parking, they would be a disaster for the residents pushing thousands of cars to residential streets and endangering children, pedestrians an

20.166
njoy the scenery both directions. Especially as you come past the lane towards cows, in that view of the mountains and everyt ights to protect their property. If that case is successful, the City should be able to keep road and path as is without meddling

20.167
e neighborhoods as the thousands of daily vehicles have been "temporarily" diverted into our neighborhoods for over a year d called the Ocean Shore RR and not a street. That is why Delaware Ave. is so straight. When the RR went bankrupt the city took ay not be able to access West Cliff due to limitations that don’t allow them to walk or bike. Two way traffic is preferred to not way traffic and parking, they have to go somewhere, and the neighborhoods will bear the full brunt of this. The City is not liste ing children, pedestrians and bicyclists. We have had to manage erosion for 100’s of years on west cliff and have proven cost

20.168
f the mountains and everything and having one way going the other way, would be ridiculous." path as is without meddling by the Coastal Commission. The City should drag their feet on this, the character of West Side will

20.169
hborhoods for over a year during Wrst Cliff repairs and will continue to be for another year between Woodrow and Almar sinc went bankrupt the city took it over and made it a public street. West Cliff Dr. is our crown jewel. Protect it, maintain it, and do t of this. The City is not listening to residents of aall impacted streets (only a very limited number of blocks) on the Westside a

20.170
en Woodrow and Almar since the bridge is still "in design". The neighborhood streets are not built to accommodate the high v rotect it, maintain it, and do not neglect it. 2-way access on West Cliff Dr. is important to keep traffic out of the surrounding ne

20.171
to accommodate the high volume, speed and extreme noise (in particular of increasing numbers of motorcycles) of traffic We

20.172
of motorcycles) of traffic West Cliff previously handled as both a major tourist attraction and daily local commuter and recreat

20.173
local commuter and recreation route between the East and West sides of town. Limiting traffic to westbound only would be a

20.174
westbound only would be a significantly cultural, recreational and economic loss to Santa Cruz. The most scenic way to drive

20.175
he most scenic way to drive WC is also actually Eastbound which would sadly no longer be an option."

20.176
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Josh Loya <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 8:59 AM
To: City Council
Subject: W.cliff Dr.

The proposed change to a single lane of traffic will negatively impact the immediate, and surrounding communities. I’ve already seen the effects of the temporary closures on West Cliff, with our streets being used as high-speed thoroughfares, and our own street becoming a dead end. The current two lanes have been working for 80 years, and the change is unnecessary.

Sent from my iPad

20.177
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Cindy <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 9:07 AM
To: Addison Jacobs
Cc: City Council
Subject: Re: Agenda Item #20 April 9, 2024 Council Agenda Good job!
On Apr 7, 2024, at 8:31 AM, Addison Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Mayor and Council Members,
We are writing to express our disappointment and confusion regarding proposed plans for West Cliff Drive, particularly in regard to the section between Woodrow and Almar avenues. Our home is on Oxford Way between Almar and David Way.

Sincerely,
Don and Addison Jacobs

20.178
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Addison Jacobs <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 9:16 AM
To: Cindy
Cc: City Council
Subject: Re: Agenda Item #20 April 9, 2024 Council Agenda We need a lot more!
On Apr 7, 2024, at 9:07 AM, Cindy <[email protected]> wrote:

Good job!
On Apr 7, 2024, at 8:31 AM, Addison Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote:

Sincerely,
Don and Addison Jacobs

20.179
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Marie Gabrielle Otis <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 10:02 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Agenda item #20
Please consider the facts
City staff repeatedly stated that once storm damage was repaired, West Cliff would reopen to a 2 way traffic.

Living on Oxford Way, I can vouch that the signage and measures taken to slow traffic during Westcliff repair are insufficient.

People are making U turns in front of my house. My car, parked in front of the house, was victim of a Hit and Run with considerable damage.

All day, cars go thru the barrier, and it is a risk to pedestrians The proposition of a one way traffic on Westcliff has not be reviewed by the Public Works and Transportation Commission, and no change should be put in place until all issues regarding the neighborhoods impacted are looked at and resolved.

We are being blindsided.

Clearly, the map issued by the 50 year proposal does not show anything for Oxford Way, or Alta? Staff should meet with neighborhoods and get input with what has and has not worked using the current traffic measures. City council should send postcards to all households impacted and give them a chance to have an input
Jack and Marie Gabrielle Otis
302 Oxford Way
Santa Cruz

20.180
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: jason gasser <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 11:21 AM
To: City Council
Subject: west cliff 1 way traffic proposal
I strongly object to a 'one way' proposal of west cliff dr do not install 'one way' traffic direction to one of the most popular scenic drives in California thank you Jason Gasser

20.181
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Rachel Kliger <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 11:52 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Stop 1 way on West Cliff DRIVE
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
All the residents of the lower Westside deserve to be notified of the two year proposal for 1 way on West Cliff Drive, and given a chance to comment. I do not believe that the council has given the residents there a fair chance to be part of this decision.

Traffic has been a nightmare in the lower Westside and the city council has not taken into consideration the burden this has placed on the residents.

Rachel Kliger
546 Arroyo Seco
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
831-426-7059
[email protected]

20.182
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Connie <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 12:20 PM
To: City Council
Subject: 1 way on West Cliff DRIVE
Dear Mayor and City Council Members
I totally support the pilot plan for one-way traffic on West Cliff. Realizing it is at least a year off the city can work on viable responsible and sustainable traffic plans for the streets that will be impacted at this point West Cliff is totally closed at Woodrow and people have survived one-way traffic will allow people to drive along Westcliff, and then return via alternative routes.

We are all playing with nature. How long will the cliff last Big Sur is an example of how much erosion can happen with storms and none of us really know about the future we need to be visionary and plan ahead.

Honestly, at this point, it is so congested for pedestrians and cyclists. It will be a breath of fresh air to have enough room for both to enjoy Westcliff without running into each other. It will also allow more people to feel safe, walking and biking and maybe they will get out of their cars to enjoy the area.

A pilot trial is a great way to see if things work and how we can improve things and make it best for everyone.

Please consider this Sincerely Connie Wilson
Sent from my iPhone

20.183
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Maggie Ramirez <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 12:22 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Stop 1 way on West Cliff DRIVE
Dear Mayor and City Council Members
I am against the 2 year pilot program for 1 way on W Cliff. We bought our home away from W Cliff due to traffic concerns many years ago. The people that purchased homes on W Cliff obviously understood that there would always be traffic. I have watched how the traffic that’s been diverted from W Cliff has really affected the surrounding neighborhoods. It would be non democratic to force this on our neighborhoods! Maggie

20.184
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 1:36 PM
To: City Council
Subject: PLEASE !! STOP 1 way on West Cliff DRIVE
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:

I just found out about the proposal vote coming up April 9th to end two-way traffic on Westcliff. I am deeply concerned because that drive (both ways) is the JEWEL of Santa Cruz, what really sets it apart and makes it so special. It is where people go to view our most treasured feature, this exquisite Monterey Bay, and there is nothing like it except down by Asilomar in Monterey. Taking away this beautiful drive - which is SO different each direction, is really sad. And worse, it is being done without thorough input from local residents who will be affected by all the traffic changes and by ALL residents who love and drive Westcliff . Why is this being done without PUBLIC HEARINGS? Why had there not been a complete survey of ALL residents being affect by the cut through traffic that will occur for certain, wherever the traffic calming devices stop. Thousands of people use Westcliff regularly. Clearly, moving forward with this pilot program is NOT in the best interest of residents if you do not get their input! This has every appearance of the City trying to sneak through a ruling that will have many detrimental effects on neighborhoods and on people who use Westcliff, without considering the will of the people. I am informed that less than 20% of people who live in that area have been surveyed as to their opinions. Why have there been NO PUBLIC HEARINGS on this huge proposed change? Since so many people LOVE to drive along the ocean and view our greatest treasure- tourists as well as locals-this will create, as is always the case, many traffic issues, and will be taking away a beautiful drive (which looks very different when driving the two different directions).

I live on King St, near Bay, and have seen how much more DRIVING people now have to do to get to local places since the “traffic calming” was put in on a few of the side streets on King (when Longs Drugs came in there). It means more cars on King St, and for residents of King, MORE driving to get where we need to go, more sitting in Mission St traffic, which is polluting and a waste of gas but now necessary to reach your destination. This happened on Seabright many years ago, and had to be changed back, because no matter where you push traffic IT WILL NOT GO AWAY, but is just be shoved somewhere else. Residents have the right to know what is going to happen and have a voice in the process. Again-why have there been no Public Hearings on this? Why have not ALL residence on lower Westside been informed and surveyed, and truly ALL residents of the city?
Traffic calming will not stop people from driving along Westcliff, because it is the most beautiful drive in Santa Cruz County, but will cause cutting through whatever place IS available (thereby making those people who live on that street endure more traffic). I LOVE to drive along Westcliff and stop at a beach and watch the sun going down on my way home from work. We should be preserving 2-way traffic, to make Westcliff, which is so beloved by locals and tourists both, easy and safe to traverse. Bikes are also a concern. If it is one way, electric bikes will also go against traffic on the pedestrian walkways, and they now go at such high speeds that if they cannot go on the road, added safety issues will pop up. I, my children, and dogs have been nearly hit many times by fast bikes on the walkway out there.

20.185
2 I urge you to hold Public Hearings, and to let all city’s residents’ have a voice in this decision, before you just decide on your own what you want to do. We elected you and you need to listen to our voices and not just try and push things through that will be cheaper for the city, at the expense of the residents.

More and more the council seems to just do its own thing, and not seek diligently to hear what people feel about proposed projects. This is a HUGE change and will affect many, many people for years to come. Please use a PUBLIC HEARING/SURVEY PROCESS and honor its results in your decision.

Yours truly,
Elizabeth

20.186
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 1:59 PM
To: City Council
Subject: 1 way on West Cliff DRIVE
Dear Mayor and City Council Members
I totally support the trial plan for one-way traffic on West Cliff.

It is an opportunity to make it safer for both cyclists and pedestrians. And to see what works the best for all of in the neighborhood as well. Traffic flow off of Westcliff is critical in the planning for the neighborhoods.

Please support the one way trial.

Thank you.

Sincerely
Tom Wilson
Sent from my iPhone

20.187
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 2:22 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Opposed to making west cliff one way!!!
Horrible idea, I am completley opposed to turning West Cliff into a one way drive.

Thnak you,
Keith
Keith Meek I Creative Vigilante Design Studio
Logos I Advertising I Brand Identity I Print Collateral I Illustration 831.818.1705 | [email protected]
creativevigilante.com

20.188
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Jack Bowers <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 2:34 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff Vision
I fully support the West Cliff Vision. Lower West Cliff residents should accept the positive change this will bring
Jack Bowers
522 Windsor Street
Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

20.189
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Russell Smyth <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 3:20 PM
To: City Council
Cc: Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson
Subject: Pelton Ave Detour
Dear City Counsel,
My name is Russ Smyth. I have lived on 824 Pelton Ave. since !988 hence I still live here though it is a struggle.

I am a WORKING CLASS individual, I cut every corner I can to stay in Santa Cruz, I am crest-fallen to hear consideration to make West Cliff one-way when we were told two way traffic would return after repairs were completed, In the last last year I have been screamed at by motorist to get out of the f-ing road. I was physically attacked (police report filed) I spend hours in front of my house gardening on the weekends. I see lots of poor behavior.I don’t ever see any Police. I urge any council member to spend some meaningful time on Pelton Ave. on any weekend to witness the mayhem. I just want relative peace to not expect conflict as I leave my home. PLEASE keep to your word and return two-way traffic. Suggestion: close all of West Cliff once a month to traffic. I am so tired of this that and that collation here in Santa Cruz, I am just one of many on this street who are exhausted by this situation. Thank you for reading my. statement, at least I hope it is read.

Russ Smyth

20.190
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Luke Kammann <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 3:22 PM
To: City Council
Subject: One-way Traffic West Cliff Negatvie Effects on the Circles Neighborhood Dear City Council members,
I am concerned that most neighbors in the "impacted neighbors region" do not know about the proposal to change West Cliff drive to a one-way system and are inadequately informed of how that change will negatively affect our neighborhoods by bringing a huge influx of traffic to the neighborhood.

My wife and I reside in this area, are registered to vote at our home, and were not notified of a public hearing by the city, nor were we contacted by the research firm which conducted constituent surveys. I write to you today to ask for a delay until a) a thorough survey of traffic impacts to the "impacted neighbors region" has been conducted and appropriate traffic calming measures have been identified for the circles neighborhood, and b) neighbors have been informed of the results of the traffic analysis.

Of specific concern to us is the fact that, to our knowledge, no analysis of the traffic impacts has been conducted. In "The 50-year Community Vision For West Cliff," surveys indicate that the greatest concerns of all city residents associated with the change to a one-way system are associated with traffic, road safety, and parking. The plan states that the change will be "supported by traffic control measures in the surrounding neighborhood." Yet without an adequate study of those impacts, how can you put in place adequate traffic control measures? Of particular concern, as a resident of the Circles neighborhood, is that there are currently no traffic control measures contemplated beyond Delaware Avenue going toward Errett Circle. According to the city's "initial traffic calming features" map, Woodrow is the first point of egress off West Cliff back toward San Jose, downtown and all points East after Steamer Lane. It is my impression that this will significantly increase traffic through a quiet residential area that does not have the infrastructure in place to support such a heavy flow of tourist traffic.

If one stands at Woodrow and Westcliff and types "San Jose" into Google Maps, the suggested route takes one up Woodrow, around Errett Circle, along California, to Bay, and eventually to Mission, yet no traffic calming is planned for Errett Circle.

Additionally, why is Woodrow the only street on this plan without a slow turn wedge after Steamer Lane with no traffic calming measures beyond Delaware?
I encourage you to read this article by 20+ year city council member Mike Rotkin who mirrors my concerns in "Lookout."
We are deeply concerned that this is going to be approved before nearby residents of the "impacted neighbors region" are fully informed of projected impacts and have the opportunity to give their input on how their quality of life may change as a result.

20.191
2 Will there be an opportunity for public comment at Tuesday's (April 9th, 11:45 am), city council meeting either in person or on Zoom? How should concerned residents stay informed on this oneway traffic decision? Please DELAY this decision and take the time to fully ASSESS traffic impacts so that "impacted neighbors region" residents can be informed of where the proposed traffic flows are expected to go and how many more vehicles they can expect to pass in front of their homes.

Sincerely,
Luke Kammann
Circles neighborhood resident

20.192
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Leonard Rimicci <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 3:45 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff Drive
Please keep it two ways. It belongs to the public, not just a few. I live in nearby and this would negatively impact my mobility. It already has, Delaware Street is much too crowded now.

I think there is enough room for two bike lanes and two lanes of car traffic. This would be with a standard size sidewalk for pedestrians only, as it always should have been.

I have felt in danger walking my dog with all the wheeled traffic on the current walkway. Wheeled traffic needs to be separated from pedestrians.

Thank you.

20.193
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Gary Niblock <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 4:00 PM
To: City Council
Cc: Mariposa Kercheval; Nicole Napiltonia; Mike Russak
Subject: WCD Traffic Proposals re April 9 Meeting
Dear Council Members,
I live at the corner of WCD and Columbia in the three story condos that were recently rebuilt. There are about 50 or 60 people who live in the building and I’m guessing about the same is true for the residents of 880 WCD our next door neighbors. We are able to access our only driveway on WCD from both WCD and Columbia at this time. If the one-way plan is implemented we will no longer have access from Columbia which will severely limit the use of our property. The negative affects will be increased travel and driving time due to the one-way restriction, increased vehicle pollution from longer travel times and being stuck in traffic which will be inevitable during high impact visitor days, as well as extended public safety (police, fire, ambulance) response concerns due to a longer response route, to name only three things.

I’m asking you to delay a vote on this plan until more information can be provided regarding this issue. As residents of 890/880 WCD we are already denied full use our our driveway for the many events the City allows on WCD during the year. When those events occur we residents are directed to park off-site, either on Columbia or another surface street in the neighborhood which further exacerbates the parking issue in the neighborhoods. One-way travel would deny us multiple access points 100% of the time. This situation perhaps impacts us more than any other residents on WCD from Bay to Swanton.

Is there an alternative? I would like to see this thoroughly researched and discussed before moving ahead with the plan. To be specific I am adamantly opposed to restricting access to our homes by closing off WCD at Columbia.

Finally, I have been following this issue since the beginning. I have kept up with the information emails (thank you for that), and the zoom meetings and I thought I was on top of things. But I feel completely blindsided by the rush to adopt the plan. I know others do also. I refer you to former Councilman Rotkin’s piece in the Lookout that articulates what many of us are thinking.

Thank you,
Gary Niblock
890 West Cliff Drive unit 9
Santa Cruz CA 95060
831-325-1932

20.194
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Val Leoffler <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 4:01 PM
To: City Council
Cc: Val Leoffler
Subject: POSTPONE or WITHDRAW GRANT APPLICATION PROPOSAL for one way WESTCLIFF traffic on Westcliff
As a long time home owner and resident of the lower Westside Santa Cruz, I was shocked that the proposal for the grant 2 year “pilot” program to make WC one way was to appear at the Council. The needs and interests of the people who live in the impacted neighborhoods haven’t even been informed or taken into consideration. Myself and my husband are one of the few Oxford Way residents who actually received the 50 year plan “survey” and responded with questions about how such a skewed, flawed survey would adequately cover the inquiry. Never a mention of how traffic would be diverted or impacted the surrounding neighborhoods (and we both made additional comments to the writers of the survey, but no response.) We neighbors on Oxford way were severely impacted by WC closure and worked diligently with the City last year to get barricades put in place as a traffic calming measure. And now with this so called “plan” those barricades disappear and thousands (yes thousands, the official counters counted last year) of confused vehicular traffic will make their way down our streets.

PLEASE POSTPONE OR WITHDRAW this incomplete poorly written proposal till every resident who lives in the neighborhoods impacted has been notified and has an opportunity to give input.

Thank you all for your work,
Val Leoffler
Oxford Way
Santa Cruz resident

20.195
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Tom Hamilton <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 4:30 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Stop 1 way on West Cliff DRIVE
Dear Mayor and City Council Members
Please STOP until ALL NEIGHBORS on the Lower West Side have been notified and have input or rebuttal to 1 way.

Thank you, Tom Hamilton

20.196
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Pete Pappas <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 4:40 PM
To: City Council
Subject: west cliff
2 way forever.

20.197
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: barbara tyger <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 4:48 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Stop 1 way on West Cliff DRIVE I live in the trailer court on wcd. On weekends it can be impossible to get in or out in any reasonable time the roundabout is hell. Removing a bay left turn will make things worse. Please reconsider
Dear Mayor and City Council Members

20.198
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: A Webb <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 4:50 PM
To: Fred Keeley; City Council
Subject: 4/9/24 Agenda Item #20 - W. Cliff Dr one-way plans Mayor Keely and City Council members,
Both the map, and the DRAFT Pilot program, indicates the ENTIRE W. Cliff Dr would eliminate eastbound vehicle traffic. W. Cliff Dr begins at Depot Park traffic circle, and while that is one way up the hill and over the trestle bridge heading west, it is two-way between Beach St & W. Cliff intersection on the other side of the trestle bridge to Bay St, and onward.

Are we to understand then that eastbound or turning LEFT from Bay St towards Beach St intersection and down the hill towards wharf/beaches/downtown is to be eliminated?
That would be unacceptable for not only the approximatley 200 residents that live off that short section of W. Cliff Dr which includes ClearView Court MH Park and the Westcliff Townhomes, but also the main entrance to the West Cliff Inn - all share that one main W. Cliff driveway entrance with a left turn lane for eastbound and uphill Beach St traffic.

Traffic is extremely congested and backed up during the 6-8 months of "tourist" season, so many residents try to avoid the main routes to the beach/wharf from downtown areas and use Bay St if possible, then turn left (or right) on W. Cliff Dr (this can save up to 30 mins on an otherwise 45 min experience from downtown especially on weekends/holidays). Of course, that alternative will be moot with this one-way Plan with all the traffic that will connect back up with Bay St if heading towards the beach areas and downtown, assuming that will even be possible (language and maps need to clarify this in plans if this short section will still have eastbound!).

Deeply concerning is emergency and first responder delays that will come with this plan impacting all of W. Cliff Dr. and any evacuation plans which don't seem to be considered.

In the first couple of years of general community meetings pre-pandemic re:climate change and impacts to W Cliff Dr, only a very small portion of W. Cliff had been identified as being one-way westbound, and that was clearly indicated by the community to be secondary to managed retreat. I'm very surprised to see ALL of W. Cliff now included, and that is unreasonable.

20.199
2 delivery trucks, etc, back to W. Cliff Dr so they can return eastbound. This was to help reduce the glaring vehicle light impacts to the Monarch butterfly Grove on the border of Pelton near that location, particularly in Winter when it gets dark very early and Monarch migration is roosting there. This one-way W. Cliff change will cause even greater impacts to these highly sensitive and important protected wildlife species, not only from the project property, but also added cut-through traffic. Not acceptable at all!
Also concerning is that this major change did not have a Notice for a Public Hearing issued, so many residents to be impacted are likely not aware of this Project/Plan impacting ALL of W. Cliff Dr. That's never a good thing.

Sincerely,
Anita Webb
170 W. Cliff Dr.

20.200
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 5:02 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Please POSTPONE or WITHDRAW the Grant Application and proposal to make West Cliff Drive oneway for vehicle traffic Please POSTPONE or WITHDRAW the Grant Application and
proposal to make West Cliff Drive one-way for vehicle traffic As a homeowner and resident of the City of Santa Cruz for over 40 years I’m deeply troubled by the prospect of Agenda #20 motions being decided upon this Tuesday, April 9th, with insufficient information, public outreach, and meaningful public consensus (I challenge the validity and utility of the survey, which appeared biased and disingenuous to me). I implore the City Council to POSTPONE the Grant Application and proposal to make West Cliff Drive one-way for vehicle traffic and moving forward with plans that at this point have extremely uncertain outcomes and may prove very costly, counterproductive, and divisive without further refinement and involvement of the community. This is a major infrastructure project that profoundly affects thousands of people, and the City Council cannot possibly be well enough informed to make a responsible decision. All of us have a vested interest in improving Santa Cruz, but it’s ludicrous to rush a “50-year Vision.” We should work hard to define and create the best possible, achievable, long-term vision. Shouldn’t we proceed intelligently, cooperatively, and methodically, possibly (but, not necessarily) struggling for funding, rather than hastily accept funding for a project that in its current form is highly contentious and too incompletely planned and analyzed to succeed in its intentions?
Thanks very much for your work and dedication to the City of Santa Cruz.

Sincerely,
Doug Hellinger

20.201
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: barbara tyger <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 5:10 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Fwd: 4/9/24 Agenda Item #20 - W. Cliff Dr one-way plans I agree wholly with this, especially about the butterflies ---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: A Webb <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, Apr 7, 2024, 4:56 PM
Subject: Fwd: 4/9/24 Agenda Item #20 - W. Cliff Dr one-way plans To:

FYI, for what it's worth.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: A Webb <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 4:49 PM
Subject: 4/9/24 Agenda Item #20 - W. Cliff Dr one-way plans To: Mayor Keely <[email protected]>, Santa Cruz City Council <[email protected]>
Mayor Keely and City Council members,
Both the map, and the DRAFT Pilot program, indicates the ENTIRE W. Cliff Dr would eliminate eastbound vehicle traffic. W. Cliff Dr begins at Depot Park traffic circle, and while that is one way up the hill and over the trestle bridge heading west, it is two-way between Beach St & W. Cliff intersection on the other side of the trestle bridge to Bay St, and onward.

20.202
2 mins on an otherwise 45 min experience from downtown especially on weekends/holidays). Of course, that alternative will be moot with this one-way Plan with all the traffic that will connect back up with Bay St if heading towards the beach areas and downtown, assuming that will even be possible (language and maps need to clarify this in plans if this short section will still have eastbound!).

Deeply concerning is emergency and first responder delays that will come with this plan impacting all of W. Cliff Dr. and any evacuation plans which don't seem to be considered.

This appears a real DISCONNECT with the large assisted living project recently approved for W. Cliff Dr and Pelton St on the church property which very specifically has a LEFTTURN ONLY onto Pelton from the project to route traffic, including daily delivery trucks, etc, back to W. Cliff Dr so they can return eastbound. This was to help reduce the glaring vehicle light impacts to the Monarch butterfly Grove on the border of Pelton near that location, particularly in Winter when it gets dark very early and Monarch migration is roosting there. This one-way W. Cliff change will cause even greater impacts to these highly sensitive and important protected wildlife species, not only from the project property, but also added cut-through traffic. Not acceptable at all!
Also concerning is that this major change did not have a Notice for a Public Hearing issued, so many residents to be impacted are likely not aware of this Project/Plan impacting ALL of W. Cliff Dr. That's never a good thing.

Sincerely,
Anita Webb
170 W. Cliff Dr.

20.203
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Lee Taiz <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 5:11 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West cliff
One-way traffic for West Cliff will be a great hardship for the lower Westside, especially for the neighborhoods adjacent to West Cliff. We have not had an opportunity to weigh-in on this plan. Every resident in our area should have the right to speak to this issue before it is rushed through. We haven’t had that opportunity. Instead, we were told that West Cliff Drive would be restored to what it was formerly.

A “temporary" one-way two year pilot project means that West Cliff will remain on-way. The two-year plan is just a stalking horse for permanence.

And we have in fact already found out what it’s like when traffic is diverted onto our streets. We had three-way traffic jams on at Almar, David and Woodrow, and cars lined up waiting day after day, until barriers were installed. I don’t want to go back to that. We don’t need another trial to figure out what will happen.

Lee Taiz
328 Oxford Way
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

20.204
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Gregory Kolar <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 5:42 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Tuesday April 9 meeting, Subject- West Cliff Drive bike path proposals Dear city council members.

It is nice that you are considering the subject of bicycle traffic in the future of West Cliff Drive. However, being a resident of the West side I wish myself and my neighbors had been contacted on the issue of possible voting??? for some type of action on this bicycle issue on West Cliff drive topic at this very meeting on Tuesday April 9.. I received no notice of this action or discussion and it was only through the vigilant action of a neighbor that I heard of such a meeting and possible voting??? on the bicycle subject. That in itself is a grave mistake by the council….voting and discussing without the input of an informed neighborhood….a great mistake!!!! You should cancel action on this subject until you inform the people it will directly effect before discussion or voting on such action. Please do so….

Thank you…Greg Kolar 120 Monterey Street , westside, Santa Cruz CA However, since public input is important…and needed on the subject of bicycle traffic on West Cliff Drive here is my input, which I hope will be considered.(please let me know it it will or will not be considered, as well as providing me with the time and place of public comment on this issue.

Concerning some action to test ways of including bike traffic on West Cliff Drive, here are my thoughts…..certainly making West Cliff Drive one way to vehicle traffic is TOO radical and approach to be tested out for any length of time as a first choice to the solution to the problem of bicycles on West Cliff Drive.

Here is a simpler, easier, more friendly, less imposing course of action…..

1.Since the present West Cliff Drive ocean side, continuous sidewalk is approximately 11 to 12 feet wide in all places from Bay Street to Swift street. (The most popular walking and biking area, approximately two miles in length) 2. And considering that the non ocean side side walks on West Cliff Drive non ocean side are 3 to 4 feet wide in all places from Bay Street to Swift Street (The most popular and biking area, approximately two miles in length) 3. One Solution to the Bicycle traffic inclusion on West Cliff Drive is to create at 3 to 4 foot bicycle lane Marked and labeled clearly with a yellow line on the outside (traffic side) of the present 10 to 12 foot sidewalk. This way, pedestrian traffic can be politely guided onto the non traffic, view side of the 11 to 12 foot sidewalk, and bike traffic can be gently guided onto the remaining 3 to 4 feet section on the West Cliff walkway. This 8 foot wide pedestian walkway would comfortably serve and protect two (2)people walking abreast on the view side of the side walk ( which describes the majority of the foot traffic numbers, e.g. one or two people enjoying the walk and view that West Cliff Drive is noted for, at the same time bicycle traffic would not be a consideration for the walking pedestrian because the 3 to 4 foot bicycle lane would safe passage of a singe bicycled its rider in the 3-4 foot bicycle lane also enjoying the views and fresh air West Cliff Drive provides. This option could be tested without the tremendously disturbing effects, for example, that a complete shut down of one lane of two way roadway in favor of a bicycle single traffic lane size area as an option would have on the community of people who enjoy walking, driving, and biking West Cliff Drive. Any problems like meeting pedestrians AND/OR bike traffic going in the opposite direction ( which sometimes happens on the present 11 to 12 foot wide West Cliff drive seaside walkway, would be handled like it is usually done by polite passing that might involve using a larger than directed side of the walkway for a short, but convenient, moment of sharing the roadway. Surely this is not as disruptive as any other pedestrian/bike

20.205
2 traffic solutions such as the the !00% of the public who would be forced and effected by the driving and parking problems afforded by a one way restriction to traffic flow on West Cliff Drive.

Thank you for considering these simple ideas
Greg Kolar
120 Monterey Streets
Westside resident
Santa Cruz CA

20.206
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Patti U <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 6:08 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff Drive
Dear City Council,
we are in support of having West Cliff become a one-way street like it is on East Cliff. That way a wider pedestrian and bike lane can be created and it will make it safer for other forms of transportation which will make West Cliff more enjoyable for residents and tourists.

Please move forward with creating a one-way street on West Cliff.

Thanks,
Trish & Drew
Laurel St, Santa Cruz

20.207
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Dorinda Parker <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 6:25 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Agenda Item 20, City Council Meeting on April 9 - West Cliff Drive Congratulations on the incredible amount of work City Council and staff has done over the past months to respond quickly and thoughtfully to the storm damage on West Cliff Drive beginning in January of 2023. Much good work has been done to respond for the long term to the current damage problem, as it is very apparent this is not a one-time event, but part one of a new future. We live quite close to West Cliff Drive on Woodrow, and are impacted greatly by the additional traffic in the area due to the closures and it has been so encouraging to see the City Staff responding with traffic calming helps over the past year.

We noticed agenda item #20 on the City Council meeting agenda for April 9 with a grant to be voted on for a 2 year pilot of one way traffic on West Cliff Drive. This was puzzling to us as in September of last year, City Staff told us traffic wd be two way once construction was done. We certainly understand that over time, WCD may need to go one way or no way as the cliffs are constantly changing, but we were surprised to see this come up on the agenda with no community outreach, especially at the Planning Commission open house we attended just a month or so ago.

We note there are no new traffic mitigations in the one-way plan; we see a map with the initial traffic mitigations in the packet, but nothing new due to the one-way traffic pilot. We are hoping that part of the grant money will be used for additional traffic mitigations as we will certainly need them. We wd like to request that additional "no right turn" signs by implemented along West Cliff Drive, so cars that do travel on West Cliff Drive westbound, one-way, will travel for the duration rather than turning right into the impacted streets around the neighborhood that will now be contending with permanent traffic impacts. We live on Woodrow, which is now impacted with many more loud and speeding cars and motorcycles coming up Woodrow from Pelton (soon to be West Cliff Drive) toward the Circles, without stopping at the stopsign at Pelton and Woodrow.

West Cliff Drive is a well-known and well-loved cruising spot (and loud cars and motorcycles do like to cruise) so cruising uphill on Woodrow, coming off of West Cliff Drive involves speed and additional noise, which is dangerous for pedestrians and disturbing to everyone. This is a traffic problem that will need to be mitigated as part of the two year study and we sincerely hope this will be studied and mitigated as part of the grant.

We recall that FHWA funds were procured and used by the City of Santa Cruz to fix the damage on West Cliff Drive because West Cliff Drive is a main thoroughfare. We look forward to seeing the next chapter of West Cliff Drive serving our community as a main thoroughfare with safe car, motorcycle, pedestrian, bike, surfer, and all manner of traffic for the future. This will require additional traffic mitigations that will be thoughtful responses to the changes needed on West Cliff Drive.

Thank you,
Jonathan Parker
Dorinda Parker

20.208
2 20.209
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 6:53 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support West Cliff Pilot
Dear Council Member,
It would be lovely for people to be able to walk on West Cliff without fear of collisions with bicyclists. This is all the more urgent with the prevalence of electric bikes. Please support the pilot program for separating bicyclists and pedestrians.

Thank you,Mark Alexander 33 year resident of SC

20.210
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Rob Butterfield <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 6:31 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Opposing west cliff drive one way grant
We oppose the one way grant proposal and ask that they remove one way from the vision statement. From Rob Butterfield at 1234 west cliff drive Sent from my iPhone

20.211
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Anthony Loero <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 7:00 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Opposing the one way west cliff drive proposal.

Dear Council members, it concerns me that you all are going forward with changing West Cliff drive from two way to one way. I really think you all have not been given enough information and feed back from the residents of the lower westside of Santa Cruz In making a decision that would greatly change the feel and magic of our peaceful, friendly and safe community.

Since the repairs of West cliff drive and traffic diversion the peacefulness and safety of the west side community has been a nightmare. People are speeding down Gharkey and Laguna trying to find short cuts through all the bottlenecks.

I've been riding bikes and walking west cliff for 65 plus years and in my opinion is that there is not enough maintenance, Enforcement or signage on West cliff.

There are many roads in Santa Cruz with signage that cars and bikes share the road. When there is a lot of traffic on the West Cliff bike path I ride in the road with no problem. Remember the bike path has always been the bike path. Long time Locals know this visitors do not.

I was a small child when my Father and I watched the rip wrap put in between Gharkey and Manor street looks like it's working. Most of the areas where rip wrap was installed on west cliff is working. West Cliff can be fixed, the peacefulness of the lower West Side can be saved.

If it wasn't for the locals of the West Side, Lighthouse Field would have been destroyed by development.

Listen to the Locals, save West Cliff, learn from our neighbors at Pleasure Point, making it one way was a big mistake. Trying to make Portola Ave one way both direction with a bike path lasted a week before it was changed back.

Put your money In maintenance, signage and enforcement problem solved.

Thank you
Sent from my iPad

20.212
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: wende sharrock <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 7:13 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Purposal for 20 year plan for West Cliff
This a rush job? Seems like those with an agenda are running policies that may be of exceeding interest to all of us here on the west side and perhaps we should be notified in case we need to express our needs. Can we just slow down a minute and make decisions that include us all ? Sincerely,
Wende Sharrock
West side resident for 50 years
Sent from my iPhone

20.213
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Tyler Wilmoth <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 7:13 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Stop 1 way on West Cliff DRIVE
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
STOP the West Cliff Drive 1 way proposal until ALL Lower Westside residents have been notified. This will create a traffic and parking nightmare for residents.

Thank you,
Tyler Wilmoth
Lifetime Santa Cruz resident

20.214
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Gregory Kolar <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 8:06 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Bicycle lane West Cliff drive
Begin forwarded message:

From: Gregory Kolar <[email protected]>
Subject: Tuesday April 9 meeting, Subject- West Cliff Drive bike path proposals Date: April 7, 2024 at 5:41:45 PM PDT
To: [email protected]
Dear city council members.

Here is a simpler, easier, more friendly, less imposing course of action…..

2. And considering that the non ocean side side walks on West Cliff Drive non ocean side are 3 to 4 feet wide in all places from Bay Street to Swift Street (The most popular and biking area, approximately two miles in length)

3. One Solution to the Bicycle traffic inclusion on West Cliff Drive is to create at 3 to 4 foot

20.215
2 bicycle lane Marked and labeled clearly with a yellow line on the outside (traffic side) of the present 10 to 12 foot sidewalk. This way, pedestrian traffic can be politely guided onto the non traffic, view side of the 11 to 12 foot sidewalk, and bike traffic can be gently guided onto the remaining 3 to 4 feet section on the West Cliff walkway. This 8 foot wide pedestian walkway would comfortably serve and protect two (2)people walking abreast on the view side of the side walk ( which describes the majority of the foot traffic numbers, e.g. one or two people enjoying the walk and view that West Cliff Drive is noted for, at the same time bicycle traffic would not be a consideration for the walking pedestrian because the 3 to 4 foot bicycle lane would provide safe passage for a singe bicycled rider in the 3-4 foot bicycle lane also enjoying the views and fresh air West Cliff Drive provides. This option could be tested without the tremendously disturbing effects, for example, that a complete shut down of one lane of two way roadway in favor of a bicycle single traffic lane size area as an option would have on the community of people who enjoy walking, driving, and biking West Cliff Drive. Any problems like meeting pedestrians AND/OR bike traffic going in the opposite direction ( which sometimes happens on the present 11 to 12 foot wide West Cliff drive seaside walkway, would be handled like it is usually done by polite passing that might involve using a larger than directed side of the walkway for a short, but convenient, moment of sharing the roadway. Surely this is not as disruptive as any other pedestrian/bike traffic solutions such as the the !00% of the public who would be forced and effected by the driving and parking problems afforded by a one way restriction to traffic flow on West Cliff Drive.

Thank you for considering these simple ideas
Greg Kolar
120 Monterey Streets
Westside resident
Santa Cruz CA

20.216
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Maywa Montenegro <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 8:40 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff planning
Greetings City Councilmembers of Santa Cruz,
My name is Maywa Montenegro, and I'm writing in support of the proposal to make West Cliff a one-way road for vehicle traffic, enabling the construction of a protected bike lane. As a professor in the department of Environmental Studies at UC Santa Cruz, I hear frequently from students who travel back and forth from the Coastal Campus to the main campus. A bike lane offers a much safer alternative to Delaware for students (and faculty) commuting between our campuses. In addition, the coastal adaptation benefits of moving to one-lane traffic cannot be overemphasized. This plan aligns with the city's stepwise, evidence-based adaptation approach in the Resilience Coast Santa Cruz initiative, which involved several years of community engagement. It also appears in line with public opinion during the research recap 50-year Vision meetings, which I have followed with great interest.

I strongly support a bike path for safety, coastal adaptation, climate mitigation, and community health benefits all around.

Thank you for your time and attention.

Sincerely yours,
Maywa Montenegro
--
Maywa Montenegro | [email protected]
Assistant Professor | Environmental Studies
University of California, Santa Cruz
Unceded territory of the Awaswas-speaking Uypi Tribe
New Publications
2023. Feeding the World Byte by Byte. The Emergent Imaginaries of Data Productivism, Journal of Peasant Studies
2021. Can Agroecology and CRISPR Mix? The politics of complementarity and moving toward technology sovereignty, Agriculture and Human Values
2021. Resetting Power in Global Food Governance: The UN Food Systems Summit, Development 2021. Woke Science and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Development 2020. What grows from a pandemic? Toward an abolitionist agroecology, Journal of Peasant Studies "Why people hope enough to resist,
and why they resist enough to persist,
depends, in large measure,
on the past that is their present." - V. Nazarea (2013)

20.217
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Kevin Samson <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2024 9:22 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff Drive pilot
Council members,
I understand that a pilot program is about to begin for a two-year, one-way motor vehicle lane on West Cliff Dr. As a neighbor in the impact area, I highly disagree with this proposal. The rush to one-way needs more thought and consideration of those who live here and pay property taxes to do so. This is an affront to the citizens you supposedly represent who will experience an unnecessary influx of traffic, noise and fumes on and around our streets to satisfy visitors and others who do not live here. Please take more time to consider options that allow a two-way road, as we face an eroding shoreline. Let’s be more creative and not shut the door on our Westside neighbors.

Kevin Samson
130 Gharkey St.

Sent from my iPhone

20.218
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: TOM VLASSIS <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 7:18 AM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff Drive Proposal
Council Members, 4-8-24
My wife and I are born and raised in our fair city. As such we have seen a lot of changes. Some good and some not so good.

We have lived on the lower west side of town (off Fair Ave) for the last 50 years and we feel we have earned the right to express our feelings about the current proposal.

First of all, trust us when we tell you vehicles travel high rates of speed (45+ mph) when driving on Fair Ave in both directions. We even had a car loose control, jump the sidewalk and strike the side of our home several years ago.

Due to the large number of commercial developments on Ingall’s and McPherson streets the number of cars and motorcycles driving on Fair Ave. has increased dramatically as well. This is extremely concerning to us as our street has a lot of younger children growing up and they are constantly playing on our street or crossing Fair Ave and going over to the park on Almar. The vehicles are a real threat to their safety that’s for sure.

I mention this because in reviewing your current West Cliff Drive proposal I saw all the streets except Fair Ave that run off West Cliff Drive showed traffic calming measures being added. These included speed bumps, roundabouts, curb outs and other measures. Fair Ave. appears to be the one and only street where no such calming measures were included in the current proposal. We have talked with the city street dept. about getting a roundabout installed on Fair at Hebbard streets or speed bumps along Fair Ave running from West Cliff Drive to Mission St. They told us that it be possible for that to happen, but again the proposal doesn’t include any such protective measures being added on Fair Ave. All we have is a 4 way stop sign at Delaware and Fair and pedestrian lights at the railroad tracks up by New Leaf Market.

Lastly, as natives Santa Cruz we strongly oppose the concept of changing West Cliff Drive to a one way street.

We feel very strongly that it should remain a two way street in order to better facilitate the current and future volume of traffic. Channeling all the vehicles out towards Swanton St. will definitely have an extremely adverse effect on all the homes off West Cliff Drive as well as Delaware and even Mission Street. We don’t need, or want, it to be a one way street. Period! What ever benefit may or may not come from making it a one way street will only be at the cost to all the residents living on the lower west side. The safety of our children and our quality of life are at stake here and are definitely being jeopardized if the proposal is implemented.

As the saying goes-“you can’t put 10 pounds of potatoes in a 5 pound sack”.

Thank you for listening to our concerns and please deny any motions of accepting/implementing any motions to make West Cliff Drive a one-way street. Leave it as its always been.

Respectfully,

20.219
2 Tom and Judith Vlassis
101 Heath St.

Santa Cruz, CA

20.220
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Tammy Rogers <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 7:36 AM
To: City Council
Subject: City Council Meeting 4/9/24
I am unable to attend the City Council meeting on 4/9/24 due to work, however, I wanted to express my feelings / concerns about the city voting on one way Westbound Traffic on West Cliff Drive so soon.

I am concerned as there are no traffic mitigation plans in the proposal. I support a traffic study and additional community input especially those who live in the area surrounding West Cliff Drive.

Thank you,
Tammy Rogers
Lower Westside Resident

20.221
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Sophia Mandranis <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 8:09 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Stop 1 way on West Cliff DRIVE
Dear Mayor and City Council Members
Please keep West Cliff Dr open both ways. This road is an iconic part of Santa Cruz.

Thank you.

Sent from my iPhone

20.222
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Lola Quiroga <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 8:13 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Support for Item 20 -- April 9, 2024
Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

West Cliff Drive is so much more than a thoroughfare - it’s a destination for people from across our city, region, and world to enjoy our beautiful coastline. The current configuration does not allow people walking and biking to safely and comfortably enjoy West Cliff Drive, and conflicts between people walking, biking, and driving are common.

I love walking on West Cliff Drive because I get to enjoy the beauty of our coast, connect with my community, move my body, experience nature. I wish I could feel the same way when I bike on West Cliff, but all the positive effects are crowded out by anxiety around cars speeding past me when I bike on the road or the anxiety around passing pedestrians safely when I bike on the multi-use path. If cyclists had their own path on West Cliff, there would be less anxiety and we would be able to bike freely and experience the positive impacts of West Cliff.

The city has done a great job at taking in the impacted neighbors concerns while also respecting the results of the statistically significant surveys they conducted and supporting a one way plan. Please give city staff the green light to apply for funding for a pilot so we’ll be able to study traffic impacts and see if this is something worth pursuing long term. The grant funding will also go to traffic calming efforts on neighboring streets like Delaware, Pelton, and Woodrow, but if those are not effective, city staff and council can adjust the plans as needed, the beauty of a pilot. This approach will be the best way to collect data on traffic patterns in the surrounding neighborhoods and be able to give one way a shot before investing in any permanent changes. We’ll never know until we try.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Best,
Lola Quiroga (she/her)
Transportation and Public Works Commissioner
City of Santa Cruz
(818) 813-2541 | [email protected]

20.223
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Ryan Meckel <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 8:17 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Support for Item 20 - April 09 2024
Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

A pilot of one-way traffic for cars and a two-way bike lane on West Cliff would provide dedicated space for everyone on West Cliff, and allow us to collect data on traffic patterns and community feedback before a permanent decision is made. A pilot is the best way to see how this would work in practice and allow us to make informed decisions as a community on how to move forward. This design also allows us to be more flexible in responding to future climate impacts to our coast.

Increasing space for walking and biking to make both safe and viable options in our city is very important to me. Creating safe, welcoming spaces for walking and biking helps Santa Cruz achieve our climate action goals and makes West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Ryan Meckel

20.224
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 8:21 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20 - More Space for Walking and Biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

I love biking on West Cliff Drive because it allows me to easily get around the westside while enjoying amazing views of the Pacific Ocean and increasing space for walking and biking is very important to me. Creating safe, welcoming spaces for walking and biking helps the Santa Cruz achieve our climate action goals and makes West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a oneyear pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Thank you for your time,
Gavin Roth

20.225
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Bill Kocher <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 8:33 AM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff 50-year plan
I live on the far west side at 511 Woodland Way. I’ve read the plan and I will admit that if I was only a visitor to West Cliff, I think the artist rendering of how it could look is appealing. However, I am not a visitor and like many other west side residents I have experienced firsthand the impacts of the closure of West Cliff following the storm damage.

It is obvious that City staff also are well aware of the impacts of cut-through traffic in neighborhoods as all of the speed bumps (some apparently temporary), traffic line painting, channeling “Paddles”, closed streets (Alta), etc, are obviously an attempt to slow down or discourage speeding traffic from using neighborhoods to find a faster way around the closures, It hasn’t worked.

From experience, I am going to say that closing one lane of West Cliff will continue or likely exacerbate this problem for west side residents. I lived in Live Oak when East Cliff was made one-way and many bikers and hikers rejoiced. The Pleasure Point residents most certainly did not as the cut-through traffic was a huge impact. East Cliff, BTW, does not carry a fraction of the traffic that West Cliff does as tourism seems far more interested in West Cliff than East Cliff.

I would respectfully request no action be taken on this item without more consideration for the traffic impacts to the west side residents. Traffic calming did not work for the recent road closures and they will not work if West Cliff is made one-way.

Respectfully,
Bill Kocher

20.226
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Ann Pelletier <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 8:44 AM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff Drive
Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
I am writing to ask you to adopt the 50-year vision for West Cliff Drive.

The slide and temporary re-configuration has let us get a sense of what the road can be like with one-way traffic for cars and a two-way bike lane and it's been wonderful, giving both cyclists and pedestrians more leeway.

Though I think it's one of the most beautiful stretches of road anywhere I've ever lived or traveled, and one of my favorite walks, I used to avoid cycling along it at times, in order to avoid having to negotiate with cars.

Now I ride it every chance I get, for recreating and commuting. It's a special place and the Vision helps to ensure it will remain so.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Ann Pelletier Eatinger

20.227
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: fred geiger <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 8:53 AM
To: City Council
Subject: W Cliff
There is sufficient width for separate bike and pedestrian paths as well as two way traffic! A slight narrowing of the roadway( which would cause traffic calming) and elimination of seldom used on street parking would allow this needed space.

Such a plan was presented to the City Transportation Committee in 1999 and was complete down to the scaled blueprints , ready for bidding!
This can be a win for all interested parties !
Fred G.

20.228
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Peter Cook <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 8:57 AM
To: City Council; Matt Huffaker
Subject: West Cliff One Way WEST to EAST PLEASE!!!!
Dear Council and City Manager,
While I’m not thrilled with West Cliff being one way, if it does end up being one way, please run the traffic West to East!!! The lower westside neighborhood does not want a bunch of traffic routed into our area with no obvious return route. If you are going to one way, then it makes sense that the expectation is for visitors to walk/bike West Cliff to experience our beautiful coastline. If you are expecting visitors to drive West Cliff, then you need to figure out a way to keep the road two way. You can observe at Pleasure Point how they did not run all of 41st traffic out to pleasure point, but instead put a parking area when visitors can park and then walk/bike out to enjoy Pleasure Point. We want to be West to East like Pleasure Point if we need to go to one way on West Cliff Drive.

What a messy topic; please go slowly and get as much input and information as possible out there ahead of making any permanent changes.

Sincerely,

20.229
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Gabriel Wolff <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 9:01 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Council Members,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes and neighborhood traffic calming.

I love walking and biking on West Cliff Drive because, at this stage in my life, it provides one of my only opportunities to get outdoors and exercise. Increasing space for walking and biking is very important to me. Creating safe, welcoming spaces for walking and biking helps the City achieve our climate action goals and makes West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Gabriel Wolff
Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer

20.230
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Richard Schmidt <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 9:05 AM
To: City Council
Subject: One way Versus two way on West Cliff Drive
Dear Council members,
I am emailing to share my thoughts and concerns on changing West Cliff Drive from a two way to a one way. I have grown up on the lower West Side and surfed off of West Cliff Drive for over 50 years. I have a surf school and have taught at Cowell's since 1978.

How did we get here?
In the 50 year vision plan City staff have suggested the current usage of West Cliff Drive is not possible in the future. In the 50 year vision it states accommodating 2 way, bikes and pedestrians into the future is simply not feasible. I heartily disagree as I ride my bike on West Cliff Dr. daily and it seems to be working just fine. Most of the time I cruise the "bike path" (It's original name) and weave my way around the pedestrians. I have a bell to notify when I need to pass someone if they are obstructing the whole path. It is a minor inconvenience. If I am in a hurry I will share the road with cars who always give me plenty of space when passing me. My opinion is, why fix it if it isn't broken? It is functioning fine for all users presently. I know the City probably gets lots of complaints by walkers who say a bike whizzed by them too close. I have never witnessed a biker running into a pedestrian and I have spent my whole life around West Cliff Drive. I think our present culture in America is to blame someone else for our woes which contributes to this friction of users which is more complaining compared to actual incidents between users. I know the coast is eroding as it always has. Climate change could be accelerating the pace. However, we have the technology to suppress and slow down the erosion of West Cliff Drive in order to keep the current configuration. The City staff in their vision plan has done a great job outlining potential creative ways to do this. If nature forces our hand and eliminates parts of the road and it becomes un repairable then we can make the hard decision of eliminating a lane of traffic. It seems way premature to eliminate a lane of traffic at this point in time.

I have witnessed the increased traffic through the lower west side due to re-routed traffic from the erosion on West Cliff Drive which occurred last year. A lot of westbound cars on West Cliff Drive now prefer to exit the area and go back East on Delaware Ave rather than go back to West Cliff due to all the "calming" measure road blocks. I have a friend, Tom Powers, who lives on Delaware Ave. and he said it took him 5 minutes while he waited for roughly 80 cars before he was able to pull out from his driveway.

Bay St. has experienced extreme bottlenecking at the West Cliff Dr. stop sign due to all the rerouted traffic. Just last Friday April 5 in the afternoon I witnessed Bay St. traffic backed 2 blocks all the way to Laguna St. I know the City has attempted "calming" measures rerouting traffic but it has created anything but calm. When you reroute traffic down certain corridors it creates bottlenecks such as Bay St. What happens is drivers will become aggressive and erratic when trying to circumvent the back ups which is a huge safety concern which impacts the integrity of the neighborhoods. Have you ever driven southbound on Hwy 1 during rush hour and tried to somehow get around the bottleneck and pick an alternate route? I have and it's not good when you see how drivers behave in this situation.

Around 6 months ago my son was a victim of bottleneck traffic aggressiveness.

20.231
2 It was in the afternoon so cars were again literally backed up from Bay to Laguna. He was driving up Bay and was turning left on Laguna. There was a car parked in the red zone on the corner of Laguna and Bay heading toward West Cliff (Probably pulled over to look at their phone to figure out how to get around the bottleneck) that suddenly pulled out in front of him. He braked to avoid t-boning the car and was rear ended by the car behind him. Fortunately, no injuries occurred.

San Francisco decided to close the Great Hwy along Ocean Beach to cars on weekends since Covid.

Colin Dwyer, a frequent surfer at Ocean Beach made a comment on social media that said it has "created a traffic nightmare on the adjacent residential streets, feels less safe..." There is no doubt that making West Cliff Drive into a one way will increase bottleneck traffic aggressiveness into the lower Westside neighborhoods more than what we are now experiencing already.

I am fortunate to be a lifelong resident of Santa Cruz. I love living here now more than ever despite the population growth. The main negative aspect of population growth is definitely sitting in traffic jams. We need to do all we can to keep traffic flowing in the future. Population is still growing exponentially especially with the high rises downtown, not to mention the development which is planned on the corner of Bay St. and West Cliff Drive. West Cliff Drive is a traffic corridor which needs to stay open both ways to ease congestion and to preserve the Santa Cruz experience for future generations as it has always been.

Climate change and emissions from cars
It is great that Santa Cruz is a leader on policies related to climate change. April is Earth month and in Fred Keeley's article in the Sentinel April 7 he stated "our target is clear, achieve a 40% reduction in emissions by 2030". I am very concerned about all the extra emissions spewing from cars due to making West Cliff Drive one way.

With my Surf School I interact a lot with our tourists. Many of them are on road trips coming down Highway One from San Francisco. Presently they can exit to Natural Bridges and take the scenic route on West Cliff Drive.

Driving East and gazing across the spectacular Monterey Bay towards the Santa Lucia mountains is an incredible experience for our visitors. They can even pull over in one of the parking lots (keep all the little parking lots without parking meters!) and enjoy a picnic with their family. If West Cliff Drive becomes one way in order for them to experience West Cliff Drive they will have to go all the way to Bay St., loopback on West Cliff Drive and then loopback East again to continue their journey. Rather than a 2.5 mile drive on West Cliff Drive they have instead driven 7.5 miles just to see West Cliff Drive, our crown jewel of Santa Cruz.

Another scenario is a group of surfers coming from the east side to surf off of West Cliff Drive. They drive from Cowell's to Natural Bridges checking all the spots. They realize Mitchell's cove is the place they want to surf. They now have to loop back through the neighborhood navigating a maze of traffic calming roundabouts, one ways, stop signs and speed bumps to access their desired destination.

On my way to Sea Ranch north of San Francisco recently I became a victim of rerouted traffic. I always cruise down the Great Ocean Hwy to check out the surf on my way to the golden gate. I know they close the road on weekends but this was a Friday. For some reason it was closed so I went inland to connect to 19th ave. and continue North. I ended up driving in circles at one point as I wasn't familiar with the route. Tourists will definitely be getting lost in our neighborhoods if the one way scenario happens on West Cliff Drive.

These are just a few scenarios and there are many more that are going to increase mileage driven due to rerouting traffic. Cars idling in the bottleneck at Bay St. will also greatly increase emissions. This doesn't seem at all to be in line with our goal of reducing emissions 40% by 2030.

20.232
3 I know one way advocates think it will be better for the planet but if you think it through it will create the opposite effect. What's more concerning is Santa Cruz has been a leader in addressing climate change and other jurisdictions are looking at us. Imagine if all the scenic routes up and down the coast become one way streets. I for one always select the scenic routes so I will be driving in circles up and down our coast spewing extra emissions to experience them if more Cities adopt this policy.

Inclusion
We should make West Cliff Drive inclusive for all users.

Bob Pearson has done surveys on who uses West Cliff Drive. I won't go into the details of how he conducted his surveys but he will. They are definitely legit. 80% of users drive their cars,16% are walkers or joggers, 4% are on bikes. By making West Cliff Drive one way you are excluding the experience for drivers which are the majority of users on West Cliff Drive. Anybody with an ounce of common sense can see that it makes no sense to prioritize a smaller group of users over another. However, by making it one way that is exactly what is happening. You can make the argument that you can still drive on West Cliff Drive in one direction which is true. However it won't be the same. Coming Eastbound from Natural Bridges is an incredible perspective looking across the bay. It will be a much different experience cruising West Cliff Drive West bound and then having to navigate the speed bumps, stop signs, roundabouts and bottlenecks when they are redirected through the neighborhoods. In a dystopian future we are all riding our bikes walking, and jogging along like in the graphic used in the 50 year vision. However a lot of elderly or disabled people or just people who don't like to ride a bike or walk or jog prefer to be in their comfortable car with the heater on, maybe a little music playing on the radio. I know lots of folks who drive up and down West Cliff Drive daily for their mental well being. It is my understanding that the future one way vision with a separate bike path needs the same real estate as the current configuration. What is being proposed is one lane of traffic is eliminated and a lane for bicycles will take that place.This is not inclusion and doesn't adhere to the health in all policy the council adopted in 2019.

Survey
The survey results are flawed. 12% of Impacted neighbors were polled, but that did not include neighborhoods closer to Bay Street.

The survey also told respondents that the proposal to divert traffic off of West Cliff Drive would include "various traffic control measures" to address the negative impacts of increased traffic in their neighborhood streets. However, it is fairly vague and residents have no idea how negative the impact is going to be on their neighborhood. Before you vote on such an important issue. We need to clarify the traffic measures and the neighborhood impacts to the community and get their response.

Pause
I encourage you all to please put a pause on this process. If you vote for the resolution turning West Cliff into a one way for two years it will have serious negative impacts on our community. If you have to do a pilot plan do it for 3 months in the summer months and we will all have a good idea on what the impacts will be. We can then do a more accurate survey when the community understands the impacts of what's being proposed. Unfortunately, a lot of folks have no idea city council is voting on a 2 year one way pilot program and what the impacts are going to be.

Since the bike path was put in there have been no improvements. We can mitigate the conflict between pedestrians and walkers on West Cliff Drive besides turning into a one way. Getting rid of all the ice plant

20.233
4 and widening the path where we can. Putting a line down the middle and some signage saying share the path where it has to be narrow would be a start.

Sincerely,
Richard Schmidt

20.234
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Johnathon Turner <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 9:20 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Financing West Cliff Drive changes
Honorable Council MembersI have looked at the 50 year plan for West Cliff Drive, and clearly some changes will happen as we move forward to protect and preserve this wonderful asset of our small city.

With the one-way plan, it seems the north-south aligned streets will provide an exit from West Cliff. I can imagine that Swift St will be a popular route due to the quick access to other amenities just south of Mission St.

And here lies the a golden opportunity for the city to quickly finance the whole retrofit of West Cliff.

Placing a permanent traffic officer at the corner of Swift St and Chace Street will provide the city with excess amounts of revenue. You see, only about 20% of drivers actually stop at the Stop Signs at Swift and Chace. I know because I live nearby. The big deal is that is a School Zone (Gateway) so I believe fines are doubled there.

A permanent traffic officer placed at the intersection could write a myriad of tickets daily for the city, and the whole 50 year West Cliff project could be paid off with the proceeds from these moving violations in less than a year.

Thank you very much.

Johnathon Turner
Chace St.

Santa Cruz, CA

20.235
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Curt Simmons <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 9:21 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Support one way traffic on West Cliff
Please make more room for people, not cars.

Curt

20.236
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Peter Whitford <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 9:33 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes and neighborhood traffic calming.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Peter Whitford

20.237
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Brittany Cole <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 9:37 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes and neighborhood traffic calming.

This design also allows us to be more flexible in responding to future climate impacts to our coast.

I love walking and biking on West Cliff Drive because of the beauty and the activity of people out and about enjoying themselves on foot and bike. Increasing space for walking and biking is very important to me. Creating safe, welcoming spaces for walking and biking helps the City achieve our climate action goals and makes West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Brittany

20.238
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Clark Shultes <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 9:38 AM
To: City Council
Cc: Lynn Robinson; [email protected]; Peter Ellis Subject: West Cliff Drive proposal
Hello City Council members, I’ve been a resident of the lower westside since 1975, we live at 307 National Street. Our backyard is 50 ft from the intersection of Delaware and Columbia Streets, and here’s a stop sign there. Over the years , Delaware has become increasingly used and become exceedingly noisy and has changed our experience in our backyard and even in our house. If West Cliff Drive were to become one way, the resulting east bound traffic would surely be funneled thru the westside residential neighborhoods, impacting local residents in an unbalanced and unacceptable way. It would more than likely concentrate on Delaware Ave cycling back to the Dream inn and the boardwalk.

West Cliff Drive is, and has always been, a landmark for Santa Cruz. The extensive work that has been done to restore it in its present form will accommodate the historic 2 way traffic. It should be maintained in that way to protect our National Treasure in its present form and respect the peace and tranquility of the westside residents.

Please honor these genuine concerns from the ones that would be impacted most.

Respectfully, Clarke and Cathey Shultes
(831) 429 1088
Sent from my iPhone

20.239
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Geraldine Kaspar <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 10:16 AM
To: City Council
Cc: geraldine kaspar
Subject: Community Feedback - West Cliff Vision
Dear Council Members,
I am writing to express my deep dismay that an action item has been placed on this weeks agenda regarding the West Cliff Vision with such limited notice to residence of this action item and the weakness of the process that has been used to address this major action.

Only 12% of respondents are from impacted neighborhoods. Data is not sufficient to approve anything in this report other than the community agrees that West Cliff should be saved from erosion and impacts of climate change. All the rest of this report is insufficient to make any of the decisions recommended in this report.

It does not clearly outline all of the problems that it is trying to solve.

It does not list the standards by which the options/recommendations will be measured.

It does not analyze the benefits or negative consequences of their recommendations against all the options that have been inadequately explored.

The impacted area is shown on a map but it does not include the entire lower west side that will be impacted, some areas more then others.

It does not adequately discuss/ investigate what those impacts, positive and negative, are other than mentioning the "Leaseback Program” for the government to make money by letting government " lease acquired properties to original owners to generate revenue” or "to third parties to reduce maintenance costs.” The implications of those statements are hugh yet completely left to ones imagination.

This is a major decision that deserves a much more rigorous and inclusive examination by people with well tested expertise. It deserves a much more extensive process to include the residences most impacted by the options. It deserves a much higher standard of excellence in the work product that mandates fuller exploration of consequences to the impacted neighborhoods. These are the people who will suffer the negative consequences and these are the people who have the best information because of living with West Cliff 24/7.

I urge Council Members to vote NO on the West Cliff 50-year Community Vision recommendations; I urge the Council Members to direct the establishment of a new Representative Oversight Board with members who have the expertise and independence to develop and thoroughly explore all identifiable options with substantiating data before authorizing grant funds for any option; I urge the Council Members to ensure the community understands the implications of the options being studied , especially those residents living in the identified impact area, by holding regular Community Study sessions at intervals and at variable times/places convenient to the residents. Notification of such

20.240
2 meetings should be sent to all residents in impacted area , by mail and phone tree with clear items to be discussed.

In conclusion, West Cliff Dr. is one of only 2 thoroughfares that provides direct access into and out of the lower west side. The other is Mission St.which is already overcrowded. Other roads used to exit from westside , ie California, Delaware, ultimately feed cars back into either WestCliff or Mission/Hyw 1 or move traffic threw residential streets, often too narrow for the traffic and intrusive to the neighborhoods. And the other road block is Bay st, regularly backed up since the roundabout was put in at the wharf. California feeds into Bay at the intersection/overcrossing for the rail trail which will be a major congestion point when the next segment to the wharf area is opened. And at the other end of Bay at West Cliff, added traffic and pedestrian crossings from the approved multistory building across from the Dream Inn will only be exacerbated by a one-way option.

Thank you for your thoughtful consideration. We need your strong and rigorous leadership before any action is taken on West Cliff Dr. except the continuation of efforts to protect against erosion and climate change. We can do better than this report reflects.

20.241
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Roland Saher <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 10:34 AM
To: City Council
Subject: westcliff drive
Dear Mayor, dear council members,
I strongly urge you to vote for installing a walkway, a bike path and a one way roadway for cars on Westcliff. This would give Santa Cruz a jewel of an attraction for both residents and tourists! Roland Saher

20.242
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: joseph herbert <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 11:51 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Prioritizing Active Transport on West Cliff
Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes and neighborhood traffic calming.

This design also allows us to be more flexible in responding to future climate impacts to our coast.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Joseph Herbert
Sent from my iPhone

20.243
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Rob Franks <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 12:10 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Comment on 50 Year Plan for West Cliff, City Council Meeting Agenda #20 My initial concern with the plan is that the pedestrian and bike paths on West Cliff wold be on the opposite (inland) side of 14 parking lots, so cars will be crossing both paths to park. I don’t know if there will be room in the lots for the cars to turn around, or if they will then need to back up across both paths to exit the lots.

I’ve had personal experience with a similar design in other cities and it creates a major point of conflict.

Rob Franks

20.244
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Jennifer G <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 12:10 PM
To: City Council
Subject: No one way
I'm a taxpayer and SantaCruz native born and raised on the WS.

Please don't pass one way.

Rebuild our roads and keep our community original for everyone to enjoy.

Jenny Sturgill-Garroutte
Sent from my iPhone

20.245
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Peter Mel <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 12:14 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Community concern West Cliff drive pilot proposal City Council members,
I oppose the proposed one-way pilot program.

As a user of West Cliff Dr. everyday and a city tax payer (live on Wavecrest Ave.). The idea of not having access to West Cliff drive in both directions is inconceivable.

Please do not allow this program to move forward.

Thank you,

PETER MEL

20.246
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Mirian Chi <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 12:15 PM
To: City Council
Subject: I disapprove
I do not approve of the one-way grant proposal. Thanks for listening Mirian Chi Sent from my iPhone

20.247
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Darryl Virostko <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 12:17 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Two way traffic support
Hello my name is Darryl Virostko I was born in Santa Cruz and lived here for 52 years on the westside.

Please do not approve of the grant proposal for one way on west cliff drive.

This is the worst thing that could happen for our community. Sending all the traffic into the neighborhoods will be dangerous for kids and everyone. My dad lives on plateau ave and he is seeing this now since west cliff has been closed. Speeding down the side streets ext.

Fix West cliff keep two way traffic. Please!꽷꽸꽹꾋꽻꽼꾍꾌꽾꽿꾀꾁꾂꾃꾄꾅꾆꾇꾈꾎 The people that should be deciding this is the people that live just in from west cliff who will be affected.

Thanks sincerely Darryl Virostko

20.248
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Robert Vorce <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 12:23 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff Drive
Walking, running, biking and cars.

Consider one way traffic and two lane bike path with a sidewalk for pedestrians.

Cars are a menace to all who enjoy the West Cliffs.

Please
Bobvorce
318 Everson

20.249
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Sarah Deworken <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 12:34 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Stop 1 way on West Cliff DRIVE
Dear Mayor and City Council Members
I am writing to ask that the city council not to vote on something so important without letting the neighborhoods that will be most impacted know.

It is shocking to me that the city council has not informed us and I had to hear it from a neighbor two days before the meeting.

I live on Monterey Street and my home has been in my family for almost 60 years and I think we deserve to know from the council when something so big is being voted on.

Sincerely,
Sarah Deworken
Monterey Street
Sent from my iPad

20.250
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Sharon Agorastos <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 12:39 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Notification
Please be sure that all families on lower Westside are notified about any West Cliff Drive proposals. We tried oneway several years ago and it was a disaster. So much speeding on Oxford Way that a stop sign had to be erected on David Way and Oxford Way. It did not help much. The sign is still there.

Sent from my iPhone

20.251
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Nancy Manning <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 12:40 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West side traffic
What are the plans for Delaware traffic. I would like to have a day of what is done before it is done. Way too much traffic in Delaware- it’s like a freeway!
Nancy Manning
508 Bethany Curve
Santa Cruz
Sent from my iPhone

20.252
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: andy goldberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 12:41 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Public Input on Agenda Item #20 on the April 9 City Council Meeting Hello,
I am writing to express my concern at the proposal to launch a two-year trial program of a one-way traffic system along West Cliff Drive.

As a resident of the lower West Side, I fear that this program is being undertaken hastily without proper consultation with the neighbors whom it will most affect, without proper analysis of the impact on traffic flows, and without planning for mitigation of the increased traffic on the streets adjacent to West Cliff. In short, it is clear to me and to many neighbors I have spoken with that the proposal elevates the needs of non-residents and tourists above the very legitimate quality-of-life concerns of those living on the lower West Side.

It therefore seems reasonable to ask the city council to postpone this decision until a number of actions can be taken:
• Conduct outreach to every resident in the impacted neighborhoods by mailing postcards to every household and providing meaningful opportunities for input and dialogue. • Direct staff to study traffic impacts of the plan and meet with residents of the affected streets to propose appropriate traffic calming measures
• Incorporate the current cul-de sac solutions along Bethany Curve into a permanent solution that would allow the greenbelt to run uninterrupted from Delaware to West Cliff thereby enhancing the city's walkable infrastructure, increasing resident safety and providing an improved experience for families.

Given these factors, it would make sense for the council to postpone its decision until a more thoughtful proposal that respects the rights of residents can be implemented.

Respectfully,
Andy Goldberg
[email protected]
831 440 8283

20.253
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Jonathan poore <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 12:44 PM
To: City Council
Subject: make West cliff two way again
I Long term resident of Santa Cruz and unfortunately can't make it to the meeting tomorrow. I would like to show support for bringing west cliff back to its two way flow of traffic. With the current setup I'm Forced to drive through neighborhoods, over speed bumps, leading to more interaction with pedestrians and increasing the wear and tear on my vehicle. It increases the number of intersections that I have to drive which has been proven to be one of the most dangerous aspects of driving.

I personally have altered my driving habits to avoid going to westcliff. I would strongly recommend having two way traffic again.

Jonathan Poore

20.254
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Jennifer Young <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 12:56 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Please no one way on West Cliff
As native Santa Cruzans we feel the impact of a one way on West Cliff would be detrimental to both locals and tourists alike. The traffic that would flood the neighborhoods would be too much for the locals to have to bear, and the loss of a touristy two way would cause both local surfers and visiting tourists much frustration and loss of access to the viewing pleasure and enjoyment of the ocean.

Please do not pass this proposal. We need a beautiful scenic two way on West Cliff Drive to exist for many years to come!
Sincerely,
Jennifer and Greg Young
521 41st. Avenue #2
Santa Cruz, CA 95062
831-818-3745
Sent from my iPhone

20.255
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Piet Canin <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 12:58 PM
To: City Council; Bonnie Bush; Fred Keeley
Cc: Kirsten Liske; Jennifer Lape
Subject: Ecology Action Letter of Support for 2-way protected bike lane on W Cliff Attachments: EA W Cliff letter 2waybike.pdf
Dear Mayor & City Council members,
Please see attached Ecology Action’s letter of support for the City staƯ proposed pilot 2-way protected bike lane on West CliƯ Drive to make biking and walking safer, more comfortable and accessible for all healthy, sustainable and aƯordable mobility. This letter is regarding the W CliƯ agenda item for your April 8, 2024 meeting.

Thank you.

Piet Canin (he/him)
Strategic Development Director
Mobile (831) 227-8987
877 Cedar St. Suite 240 Santa Cruz, CA 95060
ecoact.org

20.256
Mayor Fred Keeley & City Council April 6, 2024
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Dear Mayor Keeley,
Ecology Action strongly supports City staff’s request to apply for funding for a pilot 2-way protected bike lane on West Cliff Drive.

Ecology Action is a local environmental non-profit who has served Santa Cruz County since 1970. We develop community driven, equitable energy, water and transportation programs that build community resilience to climate change. Climate change is the existential issue of our lifetime, and we applaud the City’s efforts to reduce GHG emissions while meeting the diversity of community needs.

The City of Santa Cruz’s Climate Action Plan states that 69% of all GHG emissions in the City are generated by transportation! That means over 2/3 of our carbon pollution is largely generated from our local car trips. If our community wants to fight climate change then affordable, accessible, and safe means of non-gasoline powered vehicles are essential. To that end City staff proposed 2-way protected bike way will provide a safe and convenient place to bike/ebike separated from pedestrians and cars.

The staff-initiated 2-way protected bike lane pilot is one impactful way to reduce our carbon footprint. Their recommendation is based on significant community input generated from an inclusive and comprehensive 50-year community West Cliff Vision planning process. The West Cliff vision process included numerous interactive public workshops, surveys, mailers, and other forms of outreach. The Community has spoken, and they prioritize making W Cliff more accessible and comfortable for those walking, biking and using micro mobility devices. The results indicate that 85% of those surveyed city-wide wanted a walking path separate from cars and bikes and 74% wanted a bike lane separated from cars and other vehicles. Those are convincing numbers.

Based on national and local studies, the number one reason many people don’t bike is because they don’t feel comfortable or safe riding in car traffic. This pilot project will provide a physical barrier between people on bikes and cars on a heavily traveled route. This robust infrastructure will reduce bike crashesin a city with high bike crash rates.

Over the past 10 years there has been an average of 78 reported bike crashes annually or one at least every 5 days.

Please take proactive action to make our streets safer for healthy and climate friendly mobility. Climate change solutions require immediate and decisive action.

Sincerely,
Kirsten Liske
Vice President Community Programs

20.257
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Laurus Myth <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 1:11 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Disapproval
Hello,
I disapprove of the one way grant proposal for west cliff drive, it is essential for us to keep this road two way access.

Sincerely
Sent from my mobile device. Please pardon any typos.

Sincerely,
L
Hello

20.258
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Alyssa S <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 1:15 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes and neighborhood traffic calming.

This design also allows us to be more flexible in responding to future climate impacts to our coast.

I love walking and biking on West Cliff Drive because it is great exercise, I feel connected to my community, and it's beautiful! Increasing space for walking and biking is very important to me. Creating safe, welcoming spaces for walking and biking helps the City achieve our climate action goals and makes West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Alyssa Steiner
Santa Cruz Resident and Health Educator
--
Alyssa Steiner, MPH
Health Science/Community Health Instructor and Department Chair Cabrillo College
[email protected]
Pronouns: she, her, hers, ella

20.259
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Annette LeFever <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 1:18 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Proposed west cliff one way
I do not approve in any way of the proposal to make west cliff a one way. Just to be clear , I do not approve of the one way proposal

20.260
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 1:32 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20: Please support an increased space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes and neighborhood traffic calming.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Magi Amma
for
The Climate Alliance of Santa Cruz County

20.261
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: amelia conlen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 1:32 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20 on 4/9 agenda - support the West Cliff 50-year vision Attachments: 4.9.24 BikeSantaCruzCounty_West Cliff.pdf
Dear Mayor Keeley and Council members,
Please see attached for a letter from Bike Santa Cruz County on item 20 on tomorrow's agenda.

Thank you,
Amelia Conlen

20.262
April 8th, 2024
Re: Item 20, April 9th agenda
Dear Mayor Keeley and Council members,
West Cliff Drive is a cherished corridor and an iconic Santa Cruz landmark, and the public input process since last winter’s storms has naturally generated a lot of community conversation. We urge you to continue that conversation by approving the staff recommendation to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff Drive and pursue funding for a pilot project for two-way bike lanes and neighborhood traffic calming. We believe that the pilot would result in a West Cliff that works better for everyone, and that it is the best way to gather the necessary data on traffic impacts and public opinion before moving forward with any permanent changes.

We have heard from people throughout this process who avoid biking on West Cliff. It is uncomfortable for many cyclists to share the lane with cars, and the path is often so busy that biking is challenging or even dangerous. We also hear from people who walk on West Cliff who have had bad experiences sharing the path with people on bikes, especially as e-bikes become more prevalent. Bike Santa Cruz County has organized Open Streets West Cliff since 2016, and we have seen the joy that occurs when people have space to enjoy West Cliff and meet their neighbors without the stress of car traffic.

We hear the concerns about additional traffic in neighborhoods, and we encourage a pilot only after West Cliff has re-opened at Bethany Curve to encourage drivers to go all the way to Natural Bridges and return to town on Mission Street. We strongly support the addition of neighborhood traffic calming in a pilot project, and in fact grant funding would be the fastest way for Westside neighbors to get more traffic calming, since the City’s recent Traffic Calming program received an overwhelming number of requests.

While we know that there are many who want West Cliff to stay the same, we urge you to take bold action to explore our options. West Cliff is more than a neighborhood street - it is a destination for people across our county, our region, and the world. A pilot allows us to test a new design without investing City resources or making a permanent commitment, and it might just result in a West Cliff that is safer, more inviting, and more joyful for everyone.

Sincerely,
Amelia Conlen
Bike Santa Cruz County Board Chair

20.263
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Shane Desmond <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 1:37 PM
To: City Council
Subject: One way proposal on Westcliff
Please reconsider the one-way proposal on Westcliff. This will impact the neighborhoods off West Cliff.

Creating more traffic in the neighborhoods.

Thanks,
Shane Desmond

20.264
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: DANIEL KNOLL <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 1:37 PM
To: City Council
Subject: trial program of a one-way traffic system along West Cliff Drive Hello,
I am writing to express my concern at the proposal to launch a twoyear trial program of a one-way traffic system along West Cliff Drive.

It therefore seems reasonable to ask the city council to postpone this decision until a number of actions can be taken:
• Conduct outreach to every resident in the impacted
neighborhoods by mailing postcards to every household and providing meaningful opportunities for input and dialogue. • Direct staff to study traffic impacts of the plan and meet with residents of the affected streets to propose appropriate traffic calming measures
• Incorporate the current cul-de sac solutions along Bethany Curve into a permanent solution that would allow the greenbelt to run uninterrupted from Delaware to West Cliff thereby

20.265
2 enhancing the city's walkable infrastructure, increasing resident safety and providing an improved experience for families.

Given these factors, it would make sense for the council to postpone its decision until a more thoughtful proposal that respects the rights of residents can be implemented.

John Knoll Jr.

John Knoll Sr.
310 Oxford Way

20.266
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Clarice Owens <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 1:38 PM
To: City Council
Subject: 2 Way Please
Hello, We are long term residents of the Westside and would very much appreciate WestCliff remaining a 2 way street. Unfortunately many visitors to Santa Cruz do not maintain the same community values when coming to the city and I've many times witnessed dangerous driving and other disorderly conduct. It is simply easier to manage the ant trail of West Cliff, the Boardwalk and Bay rather than sending this chaos into the middle of the Westside communities.

Thank you, and we appreciate you allowing us to put forward our opinion on this matter.

Clarice Owens
Co-Founder
Healthy Oceans Seafood Company, Inc
(858) 922-0564
[email protected]
https://pescavoreseafood.com/
497 Lake Avenue, Santa Cruz, CA 95062
Take the Pledge To Eat #Seafood2XWk

20.267
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Adam Kagel <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 1:41 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff 1-way plan
Hello,
City’s plan to reconstruct West Cliff Drive as a one-way road will have drastic negative implications on the West Side as a whole.

With the construction taking place on West Cliff between Woodrow and Almar, we have already been provided a glimpse into what the West Side will look like if West Cliff is a one-way. West Cliff will be 50% less accessible, and the remaining 50% of traffic will be directed towards the neighborhoods between Delaware Ave and West Cliff Drive.

Residents in the affected area are fed up with their once quiet roads being turned into high volume traffic areas. Not only is it simply a nuisance, it has increased the chances of car accidents. It is no longer safe for the children to play in the streets with driver’s recklessly speeding their way down the side streets to quickly get to West Cliff. This is very uncharacteristic of the Santa Cruz us residents cherish.

It is time to put this silly idea to rest and return West Cliff to the beautiful scenic roadway it once was.

Sincerely,
Adam Kagel
408-605-5577

20.268
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Jake Fitzpatrick <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 1:50 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West cliff
Please work to ensure west cliff stays 2 way for car traffic! Jake

20.269
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: caitlin deworken <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 1:53 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Stop 1 way traffic on West Cliff DRIVE
Dear Mayor and City Council Members
I was recently informed by a neighbor that the city is going to do a trial one way traffic on W. Cliff Dr. I live on the 100 block of Monterey Street and will be directly impacted by this decision. I was never notified of this change but the city. I was never given the opportunity to voice my opinion or vote on this decision. I am 100% against the 1-way traffic and I’m requesting that the city put a stop to this. If not, at least give the neighborhoods that are directly affected a chance to vote.

I have two young children that enjoy playing in our neighborhood. With the one-way traffic, the amount of cars coming down our street will increase dramatically. Our front yard will no longer be a safe place for my children to play. Anyone that lives in our neighborhood, has seen my sons in the front yard playing street hockey, basketball, wiffleball, and more. It will be tragic to see these opportunities taken away from children.

There is no need to make Westcliffe a one-way road. By shutting down the parking lots and increasing “greenery“ is just going to attract more drug use and homeless camping. The parts of Westcliff Drive that were impacted by the storms is so small in comparison to the length of Westcliff. There is no need to make Bay Street to the lighthouse one way. That is a completely functioning road and would be a shame to see it shut down from two ways.

Please consider putting an end to this one way traffic on Westcliff Drive nonsense. The people of Santa Cruz should not have to be punished because rich people from out of town who bought houses on West Cliff in front of parking lots no longer want the parking lots in front of their house. We all know who is backing and pushing this. It’s a joke.

Caitlin Gigliotti

20.270
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Nicole Napiltonia <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 2:02 PM
To: City Council
Cc: Gary Niblock; Mariposa Kercheval; Mike Russak
Subject: Re: WCD Traffic Proposals re April 9 Meeting
City CouncilI too have major concerns and not enough information to vote as currently scheduled. My concerns are numerous and Gary outlined some, but here are a few additional:
- How will a one-way street impact our property value at The Monterey (890 West Cliff Dr). Most residents are relying on the value of their property for income at some point and if the impact is negative, this could be a life altering impact.
- If we reduce to one lane, will that allow the city to let more of the land erode? We are already dangerously close to the cliff and again, this could impact property value. - Traffic behavior is already crazy. When cars figure out the street is closed and one-way for construction, they do a lot of dangerous maneuvers to turn around. Including driving up on the sidewalk putting walkers, runners, bicyclist at risk. How will they behave when the whole thing is one-way. It a diverse and unique group that drives WCD. We’re not talking about business traffic or people who know the route.

I have been following the issues since the beginning, but likely have missed some of the data that would help inform me. I appreciate all the work you do and know this is a big issue and you’re working to solve.

Eager to make sure we have all the necessary information as we are literally on the west cliff.

Thank you for the consideration.

Nicole
Nicole Napiltonia
890 West Cliff Dr #2
1-408-307-4745
On Apr 7, 2024, at 4:00 PM, Gary Niblock <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Council Members,
I live at the corner of WCD and Columbia in the three story condos that were recently rebuilt. There are about 50 or 60 people who live in the building and I’m guessing about the same is true for the residents of 880 WCD our next door neighbors. We are able to access our only driveway on WCD from both WCD and Columbia at this time. If the one-way plan is implemented we will no longer have access from Columbia which will severely limit the

20.271
2 use of our property. The negative affects will be increased travel and driving time due to the one-way restriction, increased vehicle pollution from longer travel times and being stuck in traffic which will be inevitable during high impact visitor days, as well as extended public safety (police, fire, ambulance) response concerns due to a longer response route, to name only three things.

Thank you,
Gary Niblock
890 West Cliff Drive unit 9
Santa Cruz CA 95060
831-325-1932

20.272
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Yvonne Ajwa <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 2:17 PM
To: City Council
Subject: One-Way Westcliff
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to you to express my disapproval of and objection to the proposal of making Westcliff Drive a one-way street. This will worsen traffic for residents and will cause delays in local traffic due to an increase in coastal traffic by non-residents as well.

I urge you not to approve the one-way grant proposal and hope you follow through on respecting our community's wishes.

Sincerely,
Yvonne Ajwa
Resident of Santa Cruz, Westside

20.273
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: John Walker <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 2:28 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff Drive One Way Pilot
I strongly object to this pilot because the majority has already made it clear that they do not want a one way West Cliff Drive.

One way will reduce the general public's access to view our coastline. Monterey's 17 Mile Drive is a good example of maximizing the general public's access. Capitola's East Cliff Drive is an good example of reducing public access.

And, a one way West Cliff Drive will also reduce parking, which will negatively impact neighborhood parking and negatively impact public access to our coastline.

Sincerely,
John W Walker

20.274
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: brynne hoberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 2:54 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Agenda Item #20
Dear Council,
I am writing to express my alarm and objection to start a pilot program making West Cliff Dr. one way for cars.

I am a home owner on Oxford Way, a street and neighborhood already highly impacted by the present closure on West Cliff Dr.

One way traffic may eventually be a necessary compromise at some point in the future, but for now, two way traffic is the most practical solution for handling the heavy volume of traffic along our beautiful coastline.

In addition, I implore the city to reach out to every household in the "impacted area" before moving ahead on a plan to change traffic direction.

Please postpone this decision until that has been done.

Brynne Hoberg
320 Oxford Way

20.275
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Comcast Mail <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 2:57 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Westcliff one way proposal
Well said Andy,
As a resident near the corner of Oxford and Woodrow, I can attest to the fact that the diverted traffic from West Cliff since the storm damage has been a serious compromise to the quality of life for myself and my neighbors.

With the completion of the two retaining walls just around the corner, West Cliff is now better than it was before the storms with plenty of room for two way traffic and bikes and walking, just like it was before the storm.

There's no need to make it one way, it's an unneeded compromise and will significantly increase the traffic in bordering neighborhoods to the point of complete disruption, as it is now. All you need to do is spend a weekend at my house and listen to the roaring motorcycles and disgruntled tourists trying to navigate their way through our neighborhoods in their speeding cars. What these people want is to be able to drive along beautiful West Cliff Drive that's the cornerstone of our tourist industry and what's baffling to me is we've fixed it better than it was before and now we're going to make it half of what it could be? Some people may say " no we need to make it one way because inevitably the cliff will erode and we might as well start now ", but the thing is, we are not there yet. The hard armoring/ retaining walls we have just completed will last well into our children's lives. I'm completely blown away that this temporary one-way road vote that's about to take place before our city Council even got to where it is. Did anyone even ask anyone who lives on the west side of Santa Cruz what they thought, I'll bet you whoever pulled the trigger on this does not live in my neighborhood.

And I'm not just being selfish here or NIMBY, what we paid Farallon strategies to find out is that all the people who pay into our largest industry here(tourism) want is to come to the beach and see it! And most of those people do not wanna have to get out of their cars to do it, they're not going to hop on a bike or go walking, we want West Cliff put back the way it was because it can happen very easily.

Thanks for listening,
Chris Hosmer / Westside resident

20.276
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Cathy B <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 3:04 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Dr.

Dear City Council Members,
I am a recent transplant to Santa Cruz since moving here in 2020. We love this community and appreciate all the positive things that the city has to offer. We moved here from Park City, UT and have lived in several other places in the USA and in Europe. I feel like we have adopted a very broad understanding of what helps make a community thrive. One of things is, absolutely, pedestrian and cycling accessibility. Having safe and effective nonvehicular travel methods truly makes the culture happy and healthy, which is always a positive thing. The Bcycle program is an incredible start and now focusing on the connectivity of safe throughfares would make the circle complete. By doing this, you would find the members of this community more connected to their environment, their neighbors, positive mental outlook, and a healthy lifestyle. Santa Cruz is a place that one would rarely have to drive. The terrain is mostly flat, the weather is extremely mild, and it always beats driving in traffic. I personally go weeks on end without getting in my car, and that is such a gift. But, at times and in areas around town, I feel quite concerned for my safety. I have noticed with the forced changes to West Cliff, because of the storms, there have been more people enjoying it in a less stressed manor. The space to walk, bike, and drive without the concern for your safety. It has been an incredible year experiencing the possibilities of what it could be like on West Cliff and how much it would benefit everyone. I really hope you consider making West Cliff a one way for cars while making the other lane for bikes and the sidewalk for walking, and sooner rather than later. Let's not miss out on making this an even better place to experience the beautiful environment that surrounds us. A one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes would be the best possible way to get started with this wonderful mission. I highly recommend watching this film if you haven't seen it already. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbtffWmMppI
All the best,
Cathy Batten
541 6th Ave
435-640-4575

20.277
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Kerri Lanzarotto <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 1:25 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Please do not make west cliff a one way petition Please do not make west cliff a one-way. It is fine how it is. Let's not fix something that isn't broken. All the neighborhoods there rely on using that road. This will really impact all of the long term residents. I think it will make traffic worse there to be honest, cars will be backed up because there is nowhere to turn around. This is not a great idea. For so many reasons. Please do not make west cliff a one way.

All my best,
Kerri

20.278
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Elena Dreszer <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 3:18 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Request re: Public Input on Agenda Item #20 on the April 9 City Council Meeting Regarding the proposal to launch a two-year trial program of a one-way traffic system along West Cliff Drive, I request that the city council postpones this decision until the following actions have been taken:
• Outreach to every resident in the impacted neighborhoods is conducted by mailing postcards to every household and providing meaningful opportunities for input and dialogue. • The staff is directed to study traffic impacts of the plan and meet with residents of the affected streets to propose appropriate traffic calming measures • The current cul-de sac solutions along Bethany Curve are incorporated into a permanent solution that would allow the greenbelt to run uninterrupted from Delaware to West Cliff thereby enhancing the city's walkable infrastructure, increasing resident safety and providing an improved experience for families.

Respectfully,
Lena Dreszer
230 Oxford Way

20.279
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Julia A <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 3:20 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West cliff drive 2way
Hi,
Please keep West Cliff Drive a two-way street. We don't need a bike lane. A one way street would negatively impact the neighborhoods on West Cliff.

A $3 million "pilot project" is a huge waste. The "short term" plan is a frivilous waste.

Keep West Cliff two way.

Thank you.

Julia Apgar
116 Sadi St
Santa Cruz
95060
Sent from my iPhone

20.280
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Beverley Pearce <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 3:24 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Stop 1 way on West Cliff DRIVE
Dear Mayor and City Council Members
Please consider not making West Cliff Dr. a one way street. I live at 412 Lighthouse Ave. and will be directly affected by one way traffic on West Cliff. Cars will move slower with back ups for most of the road. I believe that moving traffic is better than cars sitting and polluting with motors running. I am also concerned about traffic and noise on our street. The 400 block of Lighthouse Ave. does not have permit parking, and consequently my family wants to park near our home. With the thousands of visitors year round, I have concern about the heavy traffic in our neighborhood. As it is now, cars speed down the street despite the speed bumps. Please let us keep the cars moving in both directions the same as it is now, and consider the residents who live here. I see no point in changing traffic flow for the sake of an experiment that can cause grief for residents who live off West Cliff.

Thank you for reading my email as a concerned citizen.

Beverley Pearce

20.281
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Roberta Marinelli <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 3:52 PM
To: City Council
Cc: Phillip Taylor; Roberta Marinelli
Subject: Proposed one-way traffic on West Cliff
Dear City Council
I was recently made aware of the possibility of a pilot effort to have West Cliff become one way, with traffic flowing from Bay St toward Natural Bridges.

As a resident of Bay St in the heavily impacted area (229 Bay St, between Delaware and Lighthouse), I am deeply concerned. On most afternoons, and particularly during the summer, it can be extremely difficult to get out of our driveway, as the southeast-flowing traffic (going toward West Cliff) is often backed up as far as California St. If this very same thoroughfare becomes the main artery to enter West Cliff, the traffic will worsen considerably.

I understand the rationale and generally support the conversion of West Cliff to be one-way. However, I suggest the direction be the opposite of what is proposed. If traffic flows from West Cliff onto Bay, then the northwest-flowing traffic exiting West Cliff will abut Barranca Park, where generally, no one will need to enter or exit in a car. People on the other side of Bay St will have a much time getting out of their driveways and into traffic.

Thank you in advance
Roberta Marinelli

20.282
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Pearce Hendrigsman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 3:55 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Do not turn Westcliff drive 1 way!
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
I live at 412 Lighthouse Ave. and was not notified of any public hearing about this major change to our neighborhood. I know for a fact that many of my neighbors have no idea of this initiative being pushed in such a short time. We already have a huge problem with weekend parking and throughways through the neighborhood. What does this supposed to solve?
You need to stop this proposal until all West Cliff Dr. neighbors are notified! Pearce Hendrigsman

20.283
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Carol Polhamus <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 3:57 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20.3 - Please pause the decision on this item until you have further public input Dear Mayor Keeley and Council Members:

I am writing regarding the portion of the West Cliff 50 Year Vision and grant application listed as 20.3.

As I have followed along with the information regarding West Cliff as a community member, it has become very clear to me in discussion with my neighbors that a lot of people in my neighborhood (listed in the "impacted neighbors" area on the city's map) are completely unaware that this is happening. The city's report states that only 12% of the poll responses have been from the "impacted neighborhood", and 88% of the responses have been from "outside the impacted neighborhood". I find this very concerning. There are many older people in our neighborhood, and social media may not be the most effective option for communicating with them to insure their input.

Next, on the map showing the “West Cliff Drive – Initial Traffic Calming Features”. (see below), although there are traffic calming measures listed on other streets, there are none shown on Oxford, Alta, Plateau as they connect to Bethany Curve Park. As you know, during the repairs there have been temporary traffic control measures in place on these streets to ensure the safety of pedestrians, bikes, kids and dogs on the well traveled Bethany Curve Park to West Cliff. To my knowledge there have been no outreach attempts by the city to discuss what will happen to these "temporary" measures--will they be removed, replaced with something else, left there indefinitely? As someone who uses the Bethany Park path daily, I can testify that there are many people using this path to get to West Cliff, and without some kind of protection at the crossing areas on the above mentioned streets, there will likely be accidents and incidents between cars and bikes, kids and dogs. Even with the current barriers in place, I am aware of several incidents including a hit and run accident that occurred at Oxford/Bethany.

I respectfully ask you to pause this important decision until these two issues are better addressed. My suggestions would be:

20.284
2 1) To send a postcard to ALL households in the "impacted neighborhoods" and let them know what is happening and a way to provide their input by a given deadline. You have to do better than have a 12% input from the impacted neighbors in order to have a valid result and prevent future upset. 2) To meet with neighborhoods that have had temporary traffic calming measures in place to let them know what the plan is going forward and to get input about what has/hasn't worked using the current measures.

Please pause the decision to allow for more public input and a discussion of these two issues. If this vision is really to be "community based", we need to insure that the community has substantially been involved, especially those likely to be the most impacted, and that any decision factors in their concerns.

Thank you for your consideration and for your service to the city. Traffic screenshot below.

Yours,
Carol Polhamus

20.285
3 20.286
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Paul <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 3:58 PM
To: City Council
Subject: West Cliff 50 year plan
Council members,
I’m absolutely against turning West Cliff into a one-way road. As a resident on Plateau Ave between Almar and Woodrow this past year has brought nothing but an increase in traffic, noise and speeding vehicles at all times of day and night and has diminished the pedestrian safety in our neighborhood.

How will you address that? How will you convince the neighbors you’re making the streets better and safer.

Most residents think the planning department is already a joke and unreliable yet you expect us to buy what they’re selling when they’re in no way held accountable. Get real.

Paul Pietryka

20.287
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Susan Cavalieri <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 4:08 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Draft 50-Year Vision for West Cliff
Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes and neighborhood traffic calming.

A pilot of one-way traffic for cars and a two-way bike lane on West Cliff would provide dedicated space for everyone on West Cliff, and allow the city to collect data on traffic patterns and community feedback. A pilot is the best way to see how this would work in practice and allow us to make informed decisions as a community on how to move forward. This design allows more flexibility in responding to the future climate impacts along this beautiful roadway.

I enjoy walking and biking on West Cliff Drive in the early morning, but would feel safer and have a more enjoyable experience if bikes and pedestrians were separated from cars. I would also appreciate less car and motorcycle noise and pollution in order to enjoy the beauty of the coast. Creating safe, welcoming spaces for walking and biking helps the City achieve its climate action goals and makes West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a oneyear pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Thank you,
Susan Cavalieri
City of Santa Cruz

20.288
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Mike Pitt <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 4:20 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Westcliff Dr remain 2-way
Members of the Santa Cruz City Council:

I strongly believe that Westcliff Drive should remain a two-lane road due to the current traffic flow and the safety of pedestrians and cyclists in the area. Converting it into a one-way street would disrupt the balance and efficiency of the road, potentially causing congestion and hazards for all users. Therefore, I urge the council to consider the negative implications of such a change and to prioritize the well-being of the community. In light of these concerns, please do not approve the one-way grant proposal. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Mike Pitt
MOTIV, Süda, Ulterior & Castaways
Ph 831.818.2020
Fx 831.475.5975
[email protected]

20.289
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Brooke <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 4:27 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Stop 1 way on West Cliff DRIVE
Dear Mayor and City Council MembersI was unaware of this until today and I would like for you to delay the vote until all people in the neighborhood have had time to learn about this proposal.

Thank you

20.290
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: ken arconti <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 4:36 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Stop 1 way on West Cliff DRIVE
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
I was just informed of the proposed West Cliff Drive One Way, two year pilot program. Please stop this until all residents of the lower west side are notified of the proposal and public hearing. This is something that will effect parking, traffic and quality of life of those living on the lower west side.

Thank you,
Ken Arconti
561 Bethany Curve
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

20.291
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Nicolas Robles <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 4:37 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

This design also allows us to be more flexible in responding to future climate impacts to our coast.

I love walking and biking on West Cliff Drive because it encapsulates the spirit of Santa Cruz and the preserved enjoyment of nature mixed into our everyday lives. Being able to bike around when the breeze is out and smell the brisk ocean air, and be able to really enjoy the scenary without the fear of getting hit by a car either on foot or on a bike would be really comforting. Looking to increase space for walking and biking is very important to me. Creating safe, welcoming spaces for walking and biking helps the City achieve our climate action goals and makes West Cliff Drive accessible to everyone in our community.

Please move forward and adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Sincerely,
Nicolas Robles | He/Him/His
Transportation Affairs Officer
UC Santa Cruz
Email: [email protected]
Let's Meet: Calendly

20.292
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Sarah Ryon <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 4:45 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Don’t approve the one-way grant proposal
There is a better solution that works in harmony for all.

Sent from my iPhone

20.293
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Bob Goldbeck <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 4:45 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Agenda item #20, One-way pilot program for West Cliff Drive April 8, 2024

Dear City Council,

We are surprised and concerned by the sudden appearance of item #20 on the April 9 council meeting agenda, which would direct staff to seek funding to reduce West Cliff Drive to one way traffic. Whether you call it a “pilot program” or not, this plan would cause an enormous shift in traffic flow through West Cliff neighborhoods that would cause long term, if not eventually permanent, harm to the safety and quality of life for residents here. We experienced firsthand the overwhelming traffic chaos created by the emergency closure of the Bethany Creek bridge/culvert after last year’s January storms. That experience gave us an appreciation for just how important West Cliff Drive is as an arterial for the lower west side, accommodating resident, visitor, service, delivery, and emergency first responder vehicles that add up to thousands of trips a day. When the city finally relieved our piece of the chaos by closing the side streets parallel to the storm closure (Oxford Way and Alta Avenue), we were thankful for this temporary traffic calming measure. But now, the city is proposing to make traffic restrictions on West Cliff permanent once the Bethany closure is reopened, while removing calming measures. The map attached to agenda item #20 unfortunately shows little in the way of traffic calming measures proposed for the great expanse of lower west side neighborhoods that lie along West Cliff Drive west of the Lighthouse Field area while removing the side street cul-de-sac closures currently in place.

We question the need to rush now into a one-way pilot without first reaching out to the residents of the affected neighborhoods, who are widely expecting an imminent return to two-way traffic as described in previous communications from the city. The proposed pilot is part of a 50-year plan, not an emergency response. The city first needs to get meaningful input from the residents who will actually be impacted by such a plan and address their concerns about how to calm the traffic disruptions that will ensue.

We therefore respectfully ask the city council to postpone this decision until the followings actions are taken:

• Reach out to every resident in the impacted neighborhoods by mailing postcards to every household and provide meaningful opportunities for input and dialogue.

20.294
2 • Direct staff to study the traffic impacts of the plan and meet with residents of the affected streets to propose appropriate traffic calming measures.

• Direct staff to consider how to Incorporate the current cul-de sac traffic calming measures along Bethany Curve into a permanent solution that would allow the greenbelt to run uninterrupted from Delaware to West Cliff and so enhance the city's walkable infrastructure, increase resident safety, and provide an improved experience for families.

Respectfully,

Bob and Jennifer Goldbeck

20.295
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: osh bartlett <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 4:46 PM
To: City Council
Subject: One way on West Cliff
To whom it may concern,
I’m a longtime west side resident that enjoys west cliff daily. I’ve lived in the circles at the end of Woodrow pretty much my whole life.I am writing as i believe West Cliff Drive being turned into a one-way road would impact the neighborhood with extensive traffic that it would not be able to handle. I would highly recommend doing a test by turning west cliff into a one way road on a busy summer week or two.

That way we can see how it affects the neighborhoods before doing anything permanent. I am definitely in favor of making the bike path wider for cyclists and pedestrians. I do love a lot of what the 50 year plan has in it as far as protecting west cliff and making it a safer nicer place for future generations to enjoy.

Thank you for your time and all you do for our awesome community.

Thank,
Osh Bartlett

Oakley Sales Representative

OPTICAL & SUN SPECIALTY CHANNEL

CELL: (831) 809-3953

Fast, easy, 24/7 online ordering: My.Luxottica.com. Take advantage of FREE shipping for any order placed—No minimums to qualify, and you’ll never miss out on sales in between my rep visits.

Luxottica Dealer Services: 1-800-422-2020, Monday-Friday 8am-8pm EST All Things Oakley Rx: Patient Calculator

20.296
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 4:48 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 20: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
Please approve the staff recommendation for Item 20 on your agenda to adopt the 50- year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of twoway bike lanes and neighborhood traffic calming.

I am a 40-year resident of the Westside and frequently use West Cliff for walking, biking, and surfing. I have walked with my small children to the beach and with my parents and grandmother (when they were in their 80s and 90s) along this beautiful path. I walk or bike to the beach with my surfboard.

However, I have been concerned for decades about the danger of walkers sharing space with bikes, especially when heavy, fast E-bikes arrived. In fact, at that point I no longer felt safe taking my elderly parents on West Cliff. Being hit by an E-bike could have resulted in them being hospitalized and losing their mobility long-term. I am aware of other walkers being injured due to sharing a bike lane.

It’s not right for walkers to feel unsafe using West Cliff and thus decide not to use the path. And as a cyclist, I feel unsafe sharing those narrow streets with vehicles-- I was nearly hit by a truck’s side mirror while riding on West Cliff! Council members’ first priority is safety of residents (and visitors).

All users deserve to use West Cliff for exercise and enjoyment safely. That’s the bottom line. The plan that’s adopted must prioritize safety as a core value.

Please adopt the 50-year Vision for West Cliff and direct staff to apply for funding for a one-year pilot of two-way bike lanes.

Thank you for your service.

20.297
2 Sincerely,
Karen Warren, Santa Cruz

20.298
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Leslie Crowell <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 4:53 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Vote No on West Cliff one way pilot

20.299
1 Rosemary Balsley
From: Anna Yamauchi <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2024 4:54 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Please support more space for walking and biking on West Cliff Drive Dear Mayor Keely and Council members,
I am a professional bike racer, who along with my partner who competed in the 2021 Tokyo Olympics and is on his journey to qualify for Paris, chose Santa Cruz as a place to reside and train on the bicycle 25+ hours a week. We experience the joys (and terrors) of bike commuting, recreational riding, sharing roads with high speed car traffic, navigating mixed use streets with pedestrians and cars, and can attest to the need for the West Cliff vision.

Please approve the staff recommendation for item 20 on your agenda and adopt the 50-year video on for West Cilgf and apply the pilot program.

Cheers,
Anna

20.300

20.301

20.302

20.303

20.304

20.305

20.306

20.307

20.308

20.309

20.310

20.311

20.312

20.313

20.314

20.315

20.316

20.317

20.318

20.319

20.320

20.321

20.322

20.323

20.324

20.325

20.326
West Cliff
50-year Community Vision
City Council
April 9, 2024
1 20.327
Agenda
● West Cliff 50-year Community Vision
 Process
 Data
 Components
 Next Steps
● Infrastructure Updates
● Lighthouse Point Study
● Active Transportation Grant Application
Artwork by Farallon Strategies 2

20.328
Introduction
3 Appreciation
Resilience and Access
Creativity and Possibility
Perspective
From Idea to Action

20.329
“Through a multi
-agency approach,
utilize the policy concepts named in
the dynamic coast section of the
draft roadmap,
including nature-based solutions,
to develop the
‘Beyond the Three Years’ section to
include a 50-year plan
by end of 2023.”
iStock
May 2023 Direction
4 20.330
Why Did West Cliff
Need a Vision?
• Community
• Aspirations
• Uses
• Long-term Resource Allocations
• Building Disaster Resilience
Our Dynamic Coast
Artwork by Farallon Strategies 5

20.331
Artwork by Farallon Strategies
Community, Council, Neighborhood Groups, Local Interest Groups, Funders, Other Agencies, and City Staff Dynamic Coast
Study Session
Process Overview
Initial Themes +
Uses
Community
Feedback - Ranking
& Sharing
3-Year Postrecovery Roadmap
50-year Community Vision
Erosion Concepts
Categories –
Habitat,
Recreation,
Mobility &
Transportation,
Beaches
4 Scenarios with
Categories –
Habitat,
Recreation,
Mobility &
Transportation,
Beaches =>
Threads
Data Validation of
Threads from
4 Scenarios
Public Opinion
Research: West
Cliff Awareness,
Attitudes, Uses,
Future Uses,
Proposals, and
Traffic Options
Data Crunching
with Narratives =>
Draft 50-year
Community Vision
15+ Community
Conversations
640+ Touch Points
West Cliff Focus Group – 6 Meetings
16 Community Conversations 2,160 Touch Points 540 People 1, 120 Public Opinion Research Poll Respondents 500 Online Survey Takers Background and Process
Community-based Themes and Uses
Consecutive Drill-down on Concepts, Themes, and Uses => Categories , Scenarios =>
Threads of Vision
Weaving of
Threads
February - August 2023 - March 2024 =>
August 2023
The Process
6 20.332
Working with Our Community => Data, Data, Data
16 Community
Conversations in
10 Months
2,160
Touch Points
540
People
500
Online Survey Takers
1,120
Public Opinion
Research Poll
Respondents
7 20.333
Who is EMC Research?
8 1989
National Public Opinion Research Founded
Public Agencies
Non-profit Organizations
Political Candidates
Corporations
Clients
Issue and Revenue Measures
Community Research, Satisfaction,
and Priorities
Public Agency Spotlight

20.334
Understanding
Understand
community
attitudes
around issues
and priorities
Representative
Sampling
Access a
representative
sample with a
known margin of
error to allow
projecting
findings from
survey
respondents to
population as a
whole
Objectivity
Provide an
objective basis
to evaluate
competing
ideas, priorities,
or approaches
Completeness
Combined with
other methods
of hearing from
the public, can
help yield a
more complete
understanding
of community
sentiment
Role of Survey Research
9 20.335
• Online survey of Santa Cruz voters -
geographically and demographically
representative sample
• Survey invitations sent to registered voters via
postcard, email, and text messages:
 Postcards included link and QR code to
survey along with a unique survey ID code for
each voter
 Email and text invites and reminders also
included a unique link to the survey
Survey Methodology
10 20.336
Survey Methodology continued
11 Dec 6, 2023 Jan 10, 2024
English and Spanish
1,120 interviews
392 from postcards
114 from email
614 from text message
(12% of respondents were identified as Impacted Neighbors based on their proximity to West Cliff)
Overall Margin of Error ±2.93 Percentage Points

20.337
Overall
Overall direction and
quality of life in Santa
Cruz and general
awareness of West
Cliff
Future Uses
Importance of future
uses of West Cliff (e.g.,
bicycling, driving,
surfing)
Future Components
Interest in potential
future components of
West Cliff area (e.g.,
types of parking,
maintaining beaches
and beach access)
Survey Structure
12 20.338
Survey Structure continued
13 Roadway Preferences Demographics
Specific questions about preference for oneway vehicle traffic vs two-way vehicle traffic • Initial preference without additional context
• Preference following argument for and
against both options
• Visuals of each
• Open ended questions asking what
respondents liked and were concerned
about for each concept
• Final preference ask

20.339
50-year Community Vision Themes
Artwork by Farallon Strategies 14

WEST CLIFF
Iconic
Equitable, Safe Access -
Pedestrians, Bicycles, and
Vehicles
Integral to Quality of Life
Resilience, Sustainability, and Habitat -
Balanced with Other Priorities Such as
Critical Infrastructure

20.340
50-year Community Vision Overview
• Balancing Change and a Collective Future
• Beauty, Resilience and Continued Use
• Prioritizing Pedestrian and Bicycle Access
• One-way Vehicle Access and Additional
Traffic Control
• Limited Hard Armoring
• Exploring Nature-based Solutions and
Engineered Natural Feature Restoration
• Park Space as Recreation Area and Buffer
• Planned Relocation
• Collaboration
Artwork by Farallon Strategies 15

20.341
Beauty, Resilience and
Continued Use • Over the next 50 years,
the community pictures
a resilient and accessible
West Cliff for all –
celebrating the beauty
and awe of the coast,
while balancing the
varied uses of residents
and visitors and keeping
the community safe
16 Artwork by Farallon Strategies 20.342
Balancing Change and a
Collective Future • Change is a constant
along West Cliff
• The community will
need to come together
to solve problems and
build a collective future
together
17 Artwork by Farallon Strategies 20.343
• Converting one lane of
traffic to separated
pedestrian and bicycle
lanes
• Additional traffic control
measures to manage new
movement and parking
patterns
Artwork by Farallon Strategies
Prioritizing Pedestrian and Bicycle
Access, plus One-way Vehicle Access
and Additional Traffic Control
18 20.344
Limited Hard Armoring • Prior community engagement suggests the community wants to
prioritize other
interventions first
• City to limit armoring to protect critical
infrastructure and
maintain access
Artwork by Farallon Strategies 19

20.345
Exploring Nature-based
Solutions and Engineered
Natural Feature Restoration
• Explore nature-based solutions and
engineered natural feature
restoration
• Potential benefits include reducing
beach erosion and protecting cliffs by
reducing wave impacts
• City to consider potential impacts like
changes to surf breaks or erosion
patterns
Carrie Drew, The Drew Creative 20

20.346
Park Space as Recreation
Area and Buffer • Ensuring park and
coastal access and
minimizing built
infrastructure
• Maintaining cliff top
space to
accommodate
changes over time
21 20.347
Planned Relocation • Explore partnerships to develop a program for public and private
landowners to engage in
optional buyout, transfer
and/or lease back programs
• Would allow space for
natural amenities for the
community to enjoy
22 20.348
● Working with the community as a whole,
and neighborhood communities
● Collaboration with the community,
public partners, research institutions,
non-profit, and private partners
Collaboration
23 Artwork by Farallon Strategies 20.349
24 Artwork by Farallon Strategies
Next Steps - Implementation
• Updates to the West Cliff
Accessible for All Roadmap to
align with the Vision
• Explore developing a
Resilience and Sustainability
Committee
• Vision updated every five
years for the first two updates,
and then every 10 years

20.350
Public Works
25 Infrastructure Updates
Lighthouse Point Study

20.351
Sites Damaged in High Swell
Event December 28, 2023
Sites Damaged by West Cliff Damages January 2023 Storms - April 2024 2116: 60” Storm Drain Damage
Funding TBD
800 Block: Path Damaged
Funding TBD
923/920: Infill Walls
Est. Construction May 2024
Bethany Culvert
Est. Construction May –Dec 2024
1030: Infill Wall
Est. Construction May –Dec 2024
9 Sites: Repair Armoring
Funding TBD (FEMA)
944/960: Sinkhole Damages
Funding TBD
2024 Bluff Erosion
26 20.352
Lighthouse Point
Hazard Analysis and
Engineering Study • Evaluate potential hazards and threats from erosion and
undermining sea
caves
• Explore mitigations
including Nature
Based-Solutions and
Engineered Natural
Feature Restoration
27 20.353
Nature-Based Solutions vs. Engineered Natural Feature Restoration 28 20.354
Public Works – Transportation
Engineering
29 Transportation and Roadway Options
Active Transportation Grant – Pilot for
Dedicated Pedestrian and Bicycle Paths +
One-Way Vehicle

20.355
Erosion Ahead
30 • West Cliff Adaptation
Plan estimated 5.6 – 7.0
feet of erosion by 2100
north of Lighthouse Field.
• Without intervention, will
likely lose the shared-
used path.

Images show possible erosion with existing
roadway as-is.

Artwork by Farallon Strategies 30 20.356
58 FT – Public Right of Way for Two-way Vehicle Traffic 46 FT – Public Right of Way for One-way Vehicle Traffic Transportation Options
(with Associated 50-year Community Vision Pillars)
• Prioritize
Pedestrian and
Bicycle Access
• Prioritize One-way
Vehicle Access
• Limit Hard
Armoring (Account
for Erosion)
• Planned Relocation
31 20.357
32 Example Two-way Roadway
One-way *PILOT* Roadway

20.358
Comparing Each Option
Owned by City
Property acquisition required
House unaffected
House impacted
Estimated Boundary of Bluff in 2100
Video will take you along the travel path to show you
routes and impacts.
33 20.359
Let’s Explore Each Option - Video
Link:
34 20.360
0 10
20 30
40 50
One-way Two-way
Impacted Homes
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4
Transportation - Future Roadway
Potential Impact to Homes
• We’re constrained between the
ocean and private property.
• Regulations, costs, and
community direction limit hard
armoring options.
• A wider roadway means more
private property impact.
• A narrower roadway means
less private property impact. (Zones are constructs of the City’s West Cliff Dr Adaptation and Management Plan)
35 20.361
The Time to Act is Now
36 • More damage will occur.
• Rebuilding again is financially unrealistic
and contrary to many City policies.
• We should create room for safe access for
all, retreat, and adaptation.

Big Sur Example
Let’s Be
Strategic
and
Proactive

20.362
One-way Pilot – Active Transportation Grant Application 37 • Active Transportation Program – Cycle 7: Quick Build • Pilot one-way vehicle traffic, with separated pedestrian and bicycle lanes, and neighborhood traffic calming from Bay to Swanton.
• Parameters:
 Two-year Pilot
 Return to Council with Pilot Design + Every 6 Months
 Implement Traffic Calming Before and During Pilot

20.363
Key Terms
• Pilot = experiment, test, proof of concepts
• Quick Build = easy to put in, adjust, and take out
38 20.364
One-way Pilot – Active Transportation Grant
39 Year 1 Year 2
Pilot Design
Outreach
Status Rptg Status Rptg Status Rptg Status Rptg
Procurement
Monitoring, Adjusting, and Evaluation (Qualitative and Quantitative) Deployment
(Est Sept 2025) Adjustments as Needed
Design
Community Conversations - Pilot Feedback
Return to Council for Next Steps
Return to Council w/ Design

20.365
Initial Features of One-way Pilot
40 Legend
Traffic Circle
Turn Wedge
Speed Hump/Cushion
Partial Closure
Turn Restriction
Key Roadways

WEST CLIFF DR

20.366
Monitor and Evaluate
• Bike and pedestrian volumes
• Vehicular volumes on corridor and
within study area
• Trip time and distance to key
destinations
• Mitigated traffic conditions –
achieve 75%:
 Local roads under 1000 VPD
 Collector/arterial roads speeds
 Critical intersection operations
• Repeat polling
• Evaluate summer/peak and off-peak
41 20.367
Procure Monitor Evaluate Install
Iterative Traffic Calming Process
42 20.368
43 Transportation Summary
• Considering the future bluff, a two-way roadway is much more impactful than a one-way roadway to adjacent properties.
• The Vision supports enhancing walking and biking over a two-way roadway. • A two-year pilot provides the opportunity to test the walking, biking and driving option, and make adjustments.
• The pilot can be modified, kept, or removed.
• Key city direction and Council policies supported: Active Transportation Plan, Climate Action 2030, and Health in All Policies.

20.369
Artwork by Farallon Strategies
Recommendations
44 Motion to:
1) Comment on and adopt the West Cliff 50-year Community Vision; 2) Receive updates on Public Works infrastructure projects related to West Cliff; 3) Adopt a resolution authorizing and directing staff to apply for, accept and appropriate grant funds for a West Cliff Dr pilot (Pilot) to test and explore a transportation option that includes one-way vehicle access with dedicated bike and pedestrian lanes and neighborhood traffic calming, in the amount not to exceed $3.5 million and from the California Active Transportation Program Quick Build Program, a grant program administered by the California Department of Transportation, and authorize the City Manager to execute, in forms approved by the City Attorney, any agreements or amendments necessary for the application and acceptance; 4) Direct staff to return to Council with quantitative and qualitative data from the Pilot at six months after Pilot begins, and every six months thereafter; and 5) Direct staff to complete a geologic hazard analysis and preliminary engineering study for Lighthouse Point.

20.370
What Questions
Do You Have?
45 20.371
City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/01/2024
AGENDA OF: 04/09/2024
DEPARTMENT: City Council
SUBJECT: Emergency Ordinance Imposing a Temporary Moratorium on the Establishment of New Commercial Cannabis Businesses in the City of Santa Cruz (CN)
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to adopt a temporary emergency ordinance to protect health, safety, and welfare by preventing the establishment of new cannabis businesses in the City of Santa Cruz to provide an opportunity to examine the City’s current system of licensing and permitting cannabis-related businesses and consider potential amendments to that system.

BACKGROUND: The State of California decriminalized the use of medical marijuana under the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, and the adult use of nonmedical marijuana was approved by the voters in the state in 2016 through the passage of the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA), modified and updated in 2017 by Senate Bill No. 94 and Assembly Bill No. 133. Based on this statutory authorization, on November 28, 2017, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2017-21 which, in part, added Part 14 – Commercial Medical and Adult Use Cannabis Regulations of Chapter 24.12 – Community Design of Title 24 – Zoning to the City of Santa Cruz Municipal Code, authorizing commercial cannabis uses, including cultivation, distribution and warehousing, testing laboratories, manufacturing and retail sales with approval of an administrative use permit. Part 14 was further amended in 2019 and 2022 by Ordinance Nos. 2019-07 and 2022-17, respectively. Part 14 authorizes the establishment of cannabis retail sales in the Community Commercial (C-C), Thoroughfare Commercial (C-T), General Industrial (I-G), and General Industrial Performance (IG/PER-2) Districts with approval of an administrative use permit and city cannabis retailer license per Chapter 6.91, and the obtaining of a state cannabis retailer or nonprofit license.

Also on November 28, 2017, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 2017-22, amending Chapter

5.07 “Cannabis Business Tax” and adding Chapter 6.91 “Cannabis Retailer Licenses” of the City of Santa Cruz Municipal Code. Chapter 5.07 was further amended in 2018 and 2019 by Ordinance Nos. 2018-16 and 2019-10, respectively. Chapter 6.91 was amended in 2020 by Ordinance No. 2020-13. As originally adopted, section 6.91.120 of Chapter 6.91 declared cannabis retailer licenses non-transferable. Ordinance No. 2020-13 amended this requirement to allow a licensee to transfer ownership of a license with approval by the Planning Department by meeting specified criteria and paying a fee based on the cost of processing.

DISCUSSION: When retail cannabis sales became available to the general public with the passage of these measures, Santa Cruz, like many jurisdictions throughout California, made

21.1 policy decisions based on the best available information regarding a wide variety of issues, including standards for licensing and permitting, zoning criteria, taxation, and law enforcement concerns. As demonstrated by the number of amendments noted above, the City’s overall regulatory scheme for cannabis-related businesses is very much a work in progress.

In the intervening years, the City has accumulated data and experience on these matters, has monitored the experiences of other jurisdictions, and has received valuable communications from all segments of the community, including residents, property owners, neighbors, cannabis business operators, school administrators and community leaders (attached). In order to give these issues due consideration, we believe and are recommending that the Council take a step back and focus on the City’s current policies and regulations concerning cannabis business operations before it considers approval of any new commercial cannabis businesses in the City of Santa Cruz. Some topics that bear further analysis could include, but would not be limited to:
 Adjustments to the commercial business tax (CBT) rate and imposition of a flat annual licensing fee for cannabis retail, distribution and cultivation/manufacturing sectors;
 Adjustments to allocations to the Children’s Fund, addition of allocations to support law enforcement related to cannabis businesses, and percentage allocated to the General Fund;
 Increases in the number of cannabis retail licenses available in the City;  Given the market value of cannabis retailer licenses created by the City’s restrictions on the number of licenses issued, exploring City’s ability to use license issuance or transfer as an opportunity to generate additional City revenue;  Modifications to the City’s regulations on cannabis retail operating conditions and delivery services; and
 Amendments to the City’s Zoning Code criteria for commercial cannabis businesses.

Pursuant to California Government Code section 65858, without following the procedures otherwise required prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance, the City Council, to protect public safety, health, and welfare, may adopt as an urgency measure an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. Per state law, the ordinance shall expire forty-five (45) days after adoption, unless it is further extended by subsequent Council action. In addition, pursuant to City Charter section 612, any ordinance declared by the City Council to be necessary as an emergency measure for preserving the public peace, health, safety or property, and containing a statement of the reasons for its urgency, may be introduced and adopted at one and the same meeting if passed by at least five (5) affirmative votes.

Based on the foregoing we believe it is in the best interest of public health, safety and welfare to pause on the issuance of any new commercial cannabis businesses to provide staff and the City Council time to adequately study the land use and other issues associated with commercial cannabis businesses.

CEQA: This proposed interim ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060(c) (2) – the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and Section 15060(c) (3) –

21.2 the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES: The proposed action aligns directly with the City’s commitment to “Health in All Policies,” by ensuring that the City’s policies for evaluating, regulating, permitting and supporting commercial cannabis businesses are aligned with the community’s values, consistent with all applicable legal requirements, and promote and enhance public health, safety and general welfare.

FISCAL IMPACT: This action is not anticipated to have any direct, significant fiscal impact on the City. Future decisions relating to possible amendments to the City’s licensing, permitting or taxation of commercial cannabis businesses could have significant fiscal impacts that should be analyzed before adopting.

Submitted By:

Fred Keeley
Mayor
Submitted By:

Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson
Councilmember
ATTACHMENTS:

1. ORDINANCE.DOC

2. JANUARY 2024 CORRESPONDENCE.PDF

21.3 ORDINANCE NO.

AN UNCODIFIED INTERIM EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA

CRUZ IMPOSING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW

COMMERCIAL CANNABIS BUSINESES IN THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ WHEREAS, the State of California decriminalized the use of medical marijuana under the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, and the adult use of nonmedical marijuana was approved by the voters in the state in 2016 through the passage of the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA), modified and updated in 2017 by Senate Bill No. 94 and Assembly Bill No. 133; and
WHEREAS, on November 28, 2017, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2017-21 which, in part, added Part 14 – Commercial Medical and Adult Use Cannabis Regulations of Chapter 24.12 – Community Design of Title 24 – Zoning to the City of Santa Cruz Municipal Code, authorizing commercial cannabis uses, including cultivation, distribution and warehousing, testing laboratories, manufacturing and retail sales with approval of an administrative use permit; and
WHEREAS, Part 14 authorizes the establishment of cannabis retail sales in the Community Commercial (C-C), Thoroughfare Commercial (C-T), General Industrial (I-G), and General Industrial Performance (IG/PER-2) Districts with approval of an administrative use permit and city cannabis retailer license per Chapter 6.91, and the obtaining of a state cannabis retailer or nonprofit license; and
WHEREAS, when retail cannabis sales became available to the general public with the passage of these measures, Santa Cruz, like many jurisdictions throughout California, made policy decisions based on the best available information regarding a wide variety of issues, including standards for licensing and permitting, zoning criteria, taxation, and law enforcement; and
WHEREAS, in the ensuing years, the City has accumulated data and experience on these matters, and has received valuable communications from all segments of the community, including residents, property owners, neighbors, cannabis business operators, school administrators and community leaders; and
WHEREAS, in order to take the necessary time and focus on these cannabis related items, the City Council finds that additional planning and research is necessary before the City considers approval of any new commercial cannabis businesses in the City of Santa Cruz; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code section 65858, without following the procedures otherwise required prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance, the City Council, to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, may adopt as an urgency measure an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time; and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Charter section 612, any ordinance declared by the City Council to be necessary as an emergency measure for preserving the public peace, health, safety

21.4 ORDINANCE NO.
or property, and containing a statement of the reasons for its urgency, may be introduced and adopted at one and the same meeting if passed by at least five (5) affirmative votes; and WHEREAS, based on the foregoing it is in the best interest of public health, safety and welfare to allow the staff and the City Council time to adequately study the land use and other issues associated with commercial cannabis businesses; and WHEREAS, based upon the foregoing, and in accordance with Government Code section 65858, the City Council finds that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare associated with the approval of additional use permits, variances, building permits or any other applicable entitlement for the establishment of any new commercial cannabis businesses while staff and the City conduct the aforementioned study; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Charter section 612, the City Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the ordinance is necessary as an emergency measure for preserving the public peace, health, safety or property for the reasons specified above.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz as follows:

Section 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 65858, from and after the date of this Ordinance, a moratorium against the establishment of any new commercial cannabis business, or the issuance of any new administrative use permit, building permit, variance or any other applicable land use entitlement for such business, is hereby enacted for a period of 45 days pending further study by City Council and staff and development of appropriate regulations. This moratorium shall apply to any use which has not yet been lawfully established in accordance will all applicable requirements of the City of Santa Cruz Municipal Code including, but not limited to, Part 14 – Commercial Medical and Adult Use Cannabis Regulations of Chapter 24.12 – Community Design of Title 24 – Zoning of the City of Santa Cruz Municipal Code, and which has not yet obtained substantial vested rights as defined by the California Supreme Court in Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional Com. (1976) 17 Cal.3d 785.

Section 2. This interim ordinance is necessary in that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, and that the approval of any applicable entitlement for any new commercial cannabis business in order to comply with a zoning ordinance would result in that threat to public health, safety, or welfare as discussed above.

Section 3. This interim ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060(c) (2) – the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and Section 15060(c) (3) – the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.

Section 4. This interim ordinance shall be of no further force and effect upon the expiration 45 days after the date of adoption, unless extended in accordance with Government Code Section 65858.

Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its adoption.

21.5 ORDINANCE NO.

PASSED FOR ADOPTION as an interim emergency ordinance this XX day of April, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED:__________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST:________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
This is to certify that the above
and foregoing document is the
original of Ordinance No.
and that it has been published or
posted in accordance with the
Charter of the City of Santa Cruz.
_____________________
City Clerk

21.6 ĞĂƌDĂǇŽƌ<ĞĞůĞǇ͕
,ĂƉƉǇEĞǁzĞĂƌĂŶĚƚŚĂŶŬǇŽƵƚŽǇŽƵƌƐĞůĨ͕ŽƵŶĐŝůtŽŵĂŶƌƵŶŶĞƌ͕ŝƚǇDĂŶĂŐĞƌ,ƵīĂŬĞƌ͕ĂŶĚ ŚŝĞĨ
ƐĐĂůĂŶƚĞĨŽƌǇŽƵƌƟŵĞŽŶĞĐĞŵďĞƌϭϵƚŚ͘tĞŚŽƉĞƚŚĂƚǇŽƵ͛ǀĞĂůůŚĂĚĂŶĞŶũŽǇĂďůĞ ŚŽůŝĚĂǇƐĞĂƐŽŶ͘tĞǀĞƌǇŵƵĐŚĂƉƉƌĞĐŝĂƚĞǇŽƵƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƟŵĞƚŽĚŝƐĐƵƐƐƚŚĞĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐǁĞĂůů ĨĂĐĞŝŶƚŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƐŝƚƵĂƟŽŶ͘dŚĂŶŬǇŽƵĨŽƌǇŽƵƌĂĐŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐŵĞŶƚƚŚĂƚǁĞĂƌĞĂŶŝŶĚƵƐƚƌǇŝŶ ĐƌŝƐŝƐĨƌŽŵĂƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚǇĂŶĚƐĞĐƵƌŝƚǇƉĞƌƐƉĞĐƟǀĞĂŶĚǇŽƵƌǁŝůůŝŶŐŶĞƐƐƚŽǁŽƌŬƚŽŐĞƚŚĞƌƚŽ ŚĞůƉĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĞǀŝĂďŝůŝƚǇŽĨůŽĐĂůůǇŽǁŶĞĚĂŶĚŽƉĞƌĂƚĞĚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͘ tĞůŽŽŬĨŽƌǁĂƌĚƚŽǁŽƌŬŝŶŐƚŽŐĞƚŚĞƌƚŽďƵŝůĚĂƐƚƌŽŶŐĞƌĂŶĚƐĂĨĞƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇŝŶ ^ĂŶƚĂƌƵǌ͘ ƐƉĞƌǇŽƵƌƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĨŽƌƵƐƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽŽƵƌĐŽůůĞĂŐƵĞƐĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉƉƌŽƉŽƐĂůƐŽŶŚŽǁƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐ ƚŚĞŝŶĚƵƐƚƌǇ͛ƐŶĞĞĚƐĨŽƌƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚǇĂŶĚƐĞĐƵƌŝƚǇ͕ǁĞǁŽƵůĚůŝŬĞƚŽƉƌŽƉŽƐĞƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ ĂĐƟŽŶƐ͘
/ƚǁŽƵůĚďĞŝĚĞĂůĨŽƌŽƵƌďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐƚŽŚĂǀĞĂǌĞƌŽĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐƚĂǆ;dͿƌĂƚĞ͕ƐŝŵŝůĂƌƚŽ ǁŚĂƚǁĞΖǀĞĞǆƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞĚŝŶŽƚŚĞƌƌĞŐŝŽŶƐǁŚĞƌĞǁĞǁĞƌĞƚƌĞĂƚĞĚƚŚĞƐĂŵĞĂƐĂŶǇŽƚŚĞƌƐŵĂůů ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐŝŶƚŚĞĐŝƚǇ͘,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ǁĞƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚƚŚĞĐŝƚǇΖƐĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐŵŝŐŚƚŵĂŬĞƚŚŝƐ ĚŝĸĐƵůƚ͘dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ǁĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞƚŚĂƚƚĂǆĂĚũƵƐƚŵĞŶƚƐďĞŵĂĚĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞƚǇƉĞŽĨůŝĐĞŶƐĞ ŚĞůĚ͕ǁŝƚŚƐƉĞĐŝĮĐĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƚŽƚŚĞdĂŶĚ'ƌŽƐƐZĞĐĞŝƉƚƚĂǆĞƐĂƉƉůŝĞĚƚŽZĞƚĂŝů͕ŝƐƚƌŝďƵƟŽŶ͕ ĂŶĚƵůƟǀĂƟŽŶͬDĂŶƵĨĂĐƚƵƌŝŶŐƐĞĐƚŽƌƐ͘
ZĞƚĂŝůͲtĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞƌĞĚƵĐŝŶŐƚŚĞŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůƵƐŝŶĞƐƐdĂǆ;dͿŽŶZĞƚĂŝůĨƌŽŵϳйƚŽϯй͕ ĂĐĐŽŵƉĂŶŝĞĚďǇĂĮǆĞĚĂŶŶƵĂůĐĂŶŶĂďŝƐůŝĐĞŶƐŝŶŐĨĞĞŽĨΨϰ͕ϬϬϬ͕ dŚŝƐǁŽƵůĚŵĂƚĐŚƚŚĞĐŽƵŶƚǇΖƐ ĂŶŶƵĂůůŝĐĞŶƐŝŶŐƌĂƚĞ͘ƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇ͕ĂŶŶĂďŝƐďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐŝŶƚŚĞĐŝƚǇĂƌĞŶŽƚĐŚĂƌŐĞĚĂŶĂŶŶƵĂů ƌĞŶĞǁĂůĨĞĞ͘dŚŝƐǁŽƵůĚďĞĂŶĞǁƚĂǆͬůŝĐĞŶƐŝŶŐĨĞĞ͘
dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚϯйdƌĂƚĞŝƐĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝŶƚĞŶƚƚŽĂůůŽĐĂƚĞϭйĨŽƌƚŚĞĂŶŶĂďŝƐ ŚŝůĚƌĞŶΖƐ &ƵŶĚ͕ϭйĨŽƌWŽůŝĐĞĂŶĚ^ĞĐƵƌŝƚǇƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĐĂŶŶĂďŝƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚŶĞĞĚƐ͕ĂŶĚϭйĨŽƌƚŚĞ 'ĞŶĞƌĂů&ƵŶĚ͘ dŚŝƐƌĞĚƵĐƟŽŶǁŽƵůĚŐŝǀĞ ^ĂŶƚĂƌƵǌŝƚǇĐĂŶŶĂďŝƐƌĞƚĂŝůĞƌƐĂĐŽŵƉĞƟƟǀĞĞĚŐĞ ŽǀĞƌŽƚŚĞƌƐŝŶƚŚĞĐŽƵŶƚǇ͕ĂƩƌĂĐƟŶŐŵŽƌĞĐƵƐƚŽŵĞƌƐƚŽƚŚĞĐŝƚǇΖƐĐĂŶŶĂďŝƐƐƚŽƌĞƐǁŝƚŚĂŶĞƚ ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŝŶŐƌŽƐƐƌĞǀĞŶƵĞ͘ dŚŝƐĐŽƵůĚĂůƐŽƉƌŽŵŽƚĞĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůƌĞƚĂŝůĂŶĚĚŝŶŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŝŶĐŝƚǇůŝŵŝƚƐ͘ &ƵƌƚŚĞƌŵŽƌĞ͕ǁĞƐƵŐŐĞƐƚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞdƐŚŽƵůĚďĞůĞǀŝĞĚƐŽůĞůǇŽŶĐĂŶŶĂďŝƐƉƌŽĚƵĐƚƐĂŶĚŶŽƚŽŶ ŶŽŶͲĐĂŶŶĂďŝƐŵĞƌĐŚĂŶĚŝƐĞĂƐŝƐƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚŝŶŵĂŶǇũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƟŽŶƐĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞƐƚĂƚĞ͘ƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇ͕ǁĞ ŚĂǀĞƚŽƉĂǇdŽŶŝƚĞŵƐƐƵĐŚĂƐĐĂŶŶĂďŝƐĂĐĐĞƐƐŽƌŝĞƐ͕ĂƉƉĂƌĞů͕ŽƌĞǀĞŶǁŚĞŶǁĞƌĂŝƐĞĨƵŶĚƐ ĨŽƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇĞǀĞŶƚƐĂŶĚƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐ͘ &ŽƌĐŽŶƚĞǆƚ͕ƐŵŽŬĞƐŚŽƉƐĂƌĞŶŽƚƐƵďũĞĐƚĞĚƚŽdŽŶ ƚŚĞŝƌƉƌŽĚƵĐƚƐĚĞƐƉŝƚĞƐĞůůŝŶŐƉƐǇĐŚŽĂĐƟǀĞĐĂŶŶĂďŝŶŽŝĚŝƚĞŵƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞŶŽƚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚďǇd͕ ƚĞƐƟŶŐƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͕ŽƌĐŚŝůĚͲƐĂĨĞƉĂĐŬĂŐŝŶŐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ ŝƐƚƌŝďƵƟŽŶͲtĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĞůŝŵŝŶĂƟŶŐƚŚĞŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůƵƐŝŶĞƐƐdĂǆ;dͿĨŽƌ ŝƐƚƌŝďƵƟŽŶ͕ ƌĞĚƵĐŝŶŐŝƚĨƌŽŵϮйƚŽϬй͘'ŝǀĞŶƚŚĞŵŝŶŝŵĂůƉƌŽĮƚŵĂƌŐŝŶƐŝŶŝƐƚƌŝďƵƟŽŶĂŶĚƚŚĞĂďƐĞŶĐĞŽĨĂ

Santa Cruz City CouncilApril 9, 2024

Santa Cruz City Council
April 9, 2024