Santa Cruz City Council
April 28, 2026

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Regular Meeting - April 28, 2026
Council Chambers
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz
11:30 A.M. CLOSED SESSION
11:45 A.M. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, CONSENT, CONSENT PUBLIC HEARING, GENERAL

BUSINESS
Council meetings are hybrid, and may be viewed remotely, using any of the following sources:
 Click on Zoom link (no time delay): https://zoom.us/j/94684401344  Online at http://www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-council/council-meetings  Online at Watch – Community Television of Santa Cruz County  Comcast Channel 25
Or: Call any of the numbers below. If one is busy, try the next one.  1-833-548-0276 (Toll Free)
 1-833-548-0282 (Toll Free)
 1-877-853-5247 (Toll Free)
 1-669-900-9128
 Enter the meeting ID number: 946 8440 1344
 When prompted for a Participant ID, press #.
 Press *9 on your phone to “raise your hand” when the Mayor calls for public comment.  It will be your turn to speak when the Mayor calls on you. Press *6 to unmute yourself. The timer will then be set.

Correspondence to be included in the agenda packet must be received by 5:00 pm on Monday, April 27th
PLEASE NOTE:
 Council may take a break(s) as needed.
 Requests for extra speaking time on items other than Oral Communications must be made by 5:00 p.m. on Sunday, April 26th by emailing the Mayor and the City Clerk.

Approval will be confirmed via email.
[email protected] [email protected]
April 28, 2026 City Council 2
The City of Santa Cruz does not discriminate against persons with disabilities. Out of consideration for people with chemical sensitivities we ask that you attend fragrance free. Upon request, the agenda can be provided in a format to accommodate special needs. Additionally, if you wish to attend this public meeting and will require assistance such as an interpreter for American Sign Language, Spanish, or other special equipment, please call the City Clerk’s Department at 420-5030 at least five days in advance so that we can arrange for such special assistance, or email [email protected]. The Cal-Relay system number: 1-800-735-2922.

Si desea asistir a esta reunión pública y necesita ayuda - como un intérprete de lenguaje de señas americano, español u otro equipo especial - favor de llamar al Departamento de la Secretaría de la Ciudad al 420-5030 al menos cinco días antes para que podamos coordinar dicha asistencia especial o envié un correo electrónico a [email protected]. El número del sistema Cal-Relay es: 1-800-735-2922.

Agenda and Agenda Packet Materials: The City Council agenda and the complete agenda packet containing public records, which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, are available for review on the City’s website: www.santacruzca.gov/councilmeetings and at the Office of the City Clerk located at 809 Center Street, Room 8, Santa Cruz, California, during normal business hours.

Agenda Materials Submitted after Publication of the Agenda Packet: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5, public records related to an open session agenda item submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available at the same time they are distributed or made available to the legislative body on the City’s website at: www.santacruzca.gov/councilmeetings and are also available for public inspection at the Office of the City Clerk, 809 Center Street Room 8, Santa Cruz, California, during normal business hours, and at the Council meeting.

Need more information? Contact the City Clerk’s office at 831-420-5030. 11:30 AM
Statements of Disqualification
Public Comment on Closed Session Items
Closed Session

1. Real Property Negotiations (Government Code §54956.8) Property: 17-D Municipal Wharf
APN: 007-331-08
Owner: City of Santa Cruz
City Negotiator: Bonnie Lipscomb
Negotiating Parties: City of Santa Cruz and Marshall Miller and Kathryn Miller
Under Negotiation: Price, terms of payment, or both
April 28, 2026 City Council 3
City Council
11:45 AM
Call to Order
Roll Call
Oral Communications - Members of the public may address Council on matters not on the agenda, but within the jurisdiction of the Council. 30 minutes is allocated for Oral Communications. No extra time for groups will be granted.

Presentations

2. Mayoral Proclamation Declaring the Week of May 3 - May 9, 2026, as Municipal Clerks Week

3. Mayoral Proclamation Declaring May 2026 as Affordable Housing Month Presiding Officer's Announcements
Statements of Disqualification
Additions and Deletions
City Attorney Report on Closed Session
Council Meeting Calendar

4. The City Council will review the meeting calendar attached to the agenda and revise it as necessary.

April 28, 2026 City Council 4
Consent Agenda

5. Minutes of the April 14, 2026 City Council Meeting (CC) LOCATION: None
Motion to approve as submitted.

6. Consideration of Permanent Display of the Progress Pride Flag and Transgender Pride Flag at the Council Dais (CN)
LOCATION: District 4
Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the permanent display of the Progress Pride Flag and the Transgender Pride Flag at the City Council dais, alongside the United States flag, the State of California flag, and any other regularly displayed flags.

7. Proposed Resolution Regarding Use of City-Owned Facilities for Civil Immigration Enforcement Activities, Emergency Preparedness, and SB 580 Compliance (CN)
LOCATION: Citywide
Motion to adopt a resolution to:
1) Prohibit the use of City-owned facilities for civil immigration enforcement activities;
2) Direct City staff to continue emergency preparedness and continuity planning related to potential impacts on City services and facilities; and
3) Direct staff to prepare for compliance with Senate Bill 580 (Government Code § 12532.5).

April 28, 2026 City Council 5
Consent Agenda (continued)

8. Third Amendment to the Municipal Wharf Lease Agreement with Marshall Miller and Kathryn Miller for City-Owned Commercial Space at 17-D Municipal Wharf (ED)
LOCATION: District 4
Motion to:
1) Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Third Amendment to the Municipal Wharf Lease Agreement with Marshall Miller and Kathryn Miller and any related documents in a form to be approved by the City Attorney, for the commercial retail space located at 17-D Municipal Wharf;
2) Authorize the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Lease, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to be recorded in the Santa Cruz County Recorder’s Office; and
3) Adopt a finding of categorical exemption pursuant to the following CEQA guidelines: 14 CCR 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 14 CCR 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption).

9. Application and Project Management Support for Information Technology Systems (IT)
LOCATION: Citywide
Motion authorizing the Information Technology Director to approve a contract change order or amendment, in a form to be approved by the City Attorney, increasing the expenditure limits set by Council at the September 30, 2025 City Council meeting with respect to the Vantagepoint Business Solutions, LLC (Vantagepoint) Professional Services Agreement, for application and project management support of critical information technology systems. The total contract value, inclusive of this amendment, shall not exceed $1,133,300.

April 28, 2026 City Council 6
Consent Agenda (continued)

10. Donation from the Community Foundation of Santa Cruz County to Support the Abbott Lighthouse (PR)
LOCATION: District 3
Motion to:
1) Accept a donor-funded light beacon from the Community Foundation of Santa Cruz County (CFSCC) for the Abbott Lighthouse; 2) Approve of the City accepting funds raised by the CFSCC to support long-term maintenance of the building;
3) Approve the maintenance of the Abbott Lighthouse as described in this agenda report; and
4) Adopt a CEQA finding of categorical exemption pursuant to 14 CCR 15301 (existing facilities) and 14 CCR 15061 (common sense exemption).

11. Santa Cruz Wharf Interim Repairs and Recovery (PR)
LOCATION: District 4
Motion to:
1) Authorize the Parks & Recreation Director to execute a final Change Order in the amount of $36,310.15 with Jilk Heavy Construction, Inc. for the 2025 SC Wharf End Interim Repair Project (c302612); and 2) Adopt a resolution amending the FY 2026 budget to appropriate $36,310.15 in California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) reimbursements and insurance proceeds to the 2025 SC Wharf End Interim Repair Project.

April 28, 2026 City Council 7
Consent Agenda (continued)

12. Laurent Street Sewer Rehabilitation (Sewer System Improvements c401511) – Authorize to Advertise and Award (PW)
LOCATION: Districts 3 and 4
Motion to:
1) Approve the plans and specifications for the Laurent Street Sewer Rehabilitation Project and authorize staff to advertise for bids and award the contract. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Public Works Director is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget; and
2) Find the Improvements Categorical Exempt under CEQA Guidelines 14 CCR section 15301(c) (existing facilities).

13. Advance Dilemma Zone Detection and Retroreflect Project (c402216) – Notice of Completion (PW)
LOCATION: Citywide
Motion to accept the work of DC Electric Group, Inc. (Cotati, CA) as completed per plans and specifications and authorize the filing of the Notice of Completion for the Advance Dilemma Zone Detection and Retroreflect Project (c402216) and authorize the Public Works Director to sign the Notice of Completion as the Owner’s Authorized Agent.

April 28, 2026 City Council 8
Consent Agenda (continued)

14. Fleet and Employee Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Infrastructure at City Hall Annex (c405606) - Authorization to Award Contract - Budget Adjustment (PW)
LOCATION: District 4
Motion to:
1) Award a contract to Varni Electric (Watsonville, CA) for installation of EV chargers in the amount of $156,649, and authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Director of Public Works is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget;
2)Adopt a resolution to amend the FY 2026 budget and appropriate funds in the amount of $84,000 of rebate incentives from Central Coast Community Energy (3CE) for the City Hall Campus Lot 13 – EV Charging Infrastructure (c402606); and
3)Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and Section 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

15. Union/Locust Backup Generator Project (c702107) – Notice of Completion (WT)
LOCATION: District 4
Motion to accept the work of unWired Broadband, LLC. (Fresno, CA) as complete per the plans and specifications, authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion for the Union/Locust Backup Generator Project (c702107), and authorizing the Water Director to sign the Notice of Completion as the Owner’s Authorized Agent.

End Consent Agenda
April 28, 2026 City Council 9
Consent Public Hearing

16. Approval of 2026 Program Year (PY) Annual Action Plan (AAP) (ED) LOCATION: Citywide
Motion to:
1) Adopt a resolution for the City’s 2026-2027 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Annual Action Plan (AAP); 2) Direct staff to submit the 2026-2027 AAP to HUD, and authorize the City Manager to sign an application for federal funding assistance for the 2026-2027 program year; and
3) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute program/project contracts, loan and grant agreements and related loan documents with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) sub-recipients and contractors in connection with Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) activities proposed in the 2026-2027 AAP and any subsequent revisions to the 2026-2027 AAP.

General Business

17. Report on City Wildfire Preparedness Ad Hoc Committee Deliverables and Proposed Next Steps (FD)
LOCATION: Citywide
Motion to:
1) Receive a report on the activities of the Wildfire Preparedness Ad Hoc Committee, summarizing the committee’s work over the past twelve months, including key findings, collaborative efforts, and final deliverables; and
2) Direct staff to proceed with the associated Wildfire Preparedness Communications Strategy.

April 28, 2026 City Council 10
General Business (continued)

18. Active Transportation Plan Adoption (PW)
LOCATION: Citywide
Motion to:
1) Adopt a resolution approving and adopting the recommendations of the 2026 updates to the City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan; and
2) Adopt a CEQA finding of Statutory Exemption under California Public Resources Code section 21080.20.

19. Receipt of AB 481 Annual Military Equipment Report, Amendment of Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 9.90, and Resolution Adopting a Policy Update Pertaining to AB 481 Military Equipment (PD) LOCATION: Citywide
Motion to:
1) Receive the Santa Cruz Police Department’s (SCPD) Annual Military Equipment Report;
2) Introduce for publication an ordinance amending Santa Cruz Municipal Code (SCMC) Chapter 9.90 “AB 481 Military Equipment Use” clarifying the procedure for amending the Military Equipment Use Policy in SCPD Policy 705; and
3) Adopt a resolution adopting an amended Military Equipment Use Policy (SCPD Policy 705), which (a) incorporates the acquisition of additional military equipment, and (b) modifies section 705.10 (“Use in Exigent Circumstances”) to more accurately capture the Council’s intent when this matter came before the Council in 2025.

20. 2026 Annual Update on Projects in the 5-year Roadmap for West Cliff to Advance the Community’s 50-year Community Vision for West Cliff (CM/PW)
LOCATION: Districts 3 and 6
Receive a status update on the five projects identified in the City Council adopted 5-year Roadmap for West Cliff along with an update on additional West Cliff related projects.

Adjournment
April 28, 2026 City Council 11

INFORMATION ITEMS PREVIOUSLY DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCILMEMBERS ADDENDUM TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – APRIL 28, 2026

21. City Manager - Equitable Community Engagement Guidelines APO 4/17/26 (CMFYI 272)

MAYOR'S PROCLAMATIONS
ADDENDUM TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – APRIL 28, 2026

22. Proclaiming the month of April 2026 as “Sexual Assault Awareness Month” and encouraging all residents to learn more about how to end sexual assault, sexual harassment, and violence against women in Santa Cruz through prevention, programs, and public policy.

23. Proclaiming the last week of March 2026 as “Government Finance Professionals Week” and encouraging all residents to recognize and appreciate the hard work and contributions of the finance professionals who serve our community.

24. Proclaiming the month of May 2026 as “ALS Awareness Month” and encouraging all citizens to join in supporting ALS research, advocating for increased funding, and standing in solidarity with those affected by this relentless disease.

Advisory Body Appointments
The following positions are either currently vacant or the terms are due to expire.

Council will make appointments at a future meeting.

Board of Building and Fire Appeals Two openings – at-large nominations Commission for the Prevention of
Violence Against Women
One opening – to be appointed by
Councilmember Trigueiro
Downtown Commission Two openings – to be appointed by
Councilmembers Golder and O’Hara
April 28, 2026 City Council 12
Public Hearing
If, in the future, you wish to challenge in court any of the matters on this agenda for which a public hearing is to be conducted, you may be limited to raising only those issues which you (or someone else) raised orally at the public hearing or in written correspondence received by the City at or before the hearing.

Any person seeking to challenge a City Council decision made as a result of a proceeding in which, by law, a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action either 60 days or 90 days following the date on which the decision becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 Please refer to code of Civil Procedure 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes “final.” The 60-day rule applies to all public hearings conducted pursuant to the City’s Zoning Ordinance, Title 24, Santa Cruz Municipal Code. The 90-day rule applies to all other public hearings.

Property Tax Presentation
May 1 @ 6:00 PM - View Event
June Primary Candidates Forum on Housing
May 4 @ 6:30 PM - View Event
Tenants' Protections Webinar
May 5 @ 2:00 PM - View Event
May Meeting: Affordable Housing
May 5 @ 6:30 PM - View Event

Together We Build: Creating Affordable
Homes and Stronger Communities
May 6 @ 10:30 AM - View Event
Resetar Residential Hotel - Open House
May 6 @ 11:00 AM - View Event
Introducing the *New* California Housing and
Homelessness Agency (CHHA)
May 7 @ 11:00 AM - View Event
Harvey West Studios Open House
May 7 @ 4:30 PM - View Event
Building Community Together:

Annual Landlord Celebration
May 7 @ 5:30 PM - View Event
Evan Circle Home Build Groundbreaking
May 8 @ 10:00 AM - View Event
Downtown Santa Cruz Housing Walking Tour
May 9 @ 10:00 AM - View Event
Housers Happy Hour
May 12 @ 5:00 PM - View Event
Who Gets to Live Here? Fair Housing & the
Bay's Future
May 13 @ 12:00 PM - View Event
Finding Flatmates: Where Shared Housing Meets
Community
May 14 @ 6:00 PM - View Event
Hope Village Ribbon-Cutting
May 18 @ 1:00 PM - View Event
Affordable Housing Finance 101
May 19 @ 1:00 PM - View Event
May Soiree Celebrating Affordable Housing Month
May 19 @ 4:00 PM - View Event
Housing Discrimination Forum
May 21 @ 5:00 PM - View Event
First-Time Homebuyer Forum
May 27 @ 6:00 PM - View Event
Renter Displacement Crisis Forum
May 27 @ 7:00 PM - View Event
Cabrillo/UCSC Affordable Housing Presentation
and Tour
May 28 @ 3:00 PM - View Event
Affordable Housing and Basic Needs for Graduate
Students
May 28 @ 4:00 PM - View Event
All About ADUs in Santa Cruz County
May 28 @ 6:30 PM - View Event
Housing Santa Cruz County’s 6th Anniversary
Celebration & Panel Discussion on State & Local
Housing Solutions
May 30 @ 2:00 PM - View Event
"5150: A Manic Depressive Adventure" Author
Visit with Tony del Zompo
May 30 @ 2:00 PM - View Event
AFFORDABLE HOUSING MONTH - MAY 2026
Affordable Housing Month Self-Guided Bike Tour
(Available all month long!) View Details
Schedule of Events - events are subject to change, check “View Event” links for details For more information on Affordable Housing Month, visit: 3.1 santacruzca.gov/affordablehousingmonth 2026 City Council Meeting Calendar
May 12 - Regular Meeting
May 25 - City Hall Closure - Memorial Day
May 26 - Regular Meeting/Budget Hearings
May 27 - Special Meeting - Budget Hearings
June 9 - Regular Meeting
June 19 - City Hall Closure - Juneteenth
June 23 - Regular Meeting
July 3 - City Hall Closure - Independence Day
July 14 and 28 Meetings Cancelled
August 11 - Regular Meeting
August 25 - Regular Meeting
September 7 - City Hall Closure - Labor Day
September 8 - Regular Meeting
September 11/12 - Rosh Hashanah (City observed - sundown to sundown) October 20/21 - Yom Kippur (City observed - sundown to sundown) September 22 - Regular Meeting
October 13 - Regular Meeting
October 27 - Regular Meeting
November 11 - City Hall Closure - Veteran's Day (observed) November 17 - Regular Meeting
November 26 - City Hall Closure - Thanksgiving Day
November 27 - City Hall Closure - Day After Thanksgiving Day December 4/5 - Hanukkah (City observed - sundown to sundown) December 8 - Regular Meeting
December 22 Meeting Cancelled
December 25

4.1 MINUTES ARE UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED BY COUNCIL
City of Santa Cruz
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, California 95060

MINUTES OF A CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 14, 2026
Closed Session
3:00 PM
Mayor Keeley opened the City Council Closed Session at 3:00 p.m. in a public meeting via Zoom and in Council Chambers, for the purpose of announcing the agenda, and receiving public testimony.

Roll Call

Present: Councilmembers Trigueiro, Brunner, Newsome, Golder, O’Hara; Vice Mayor Kalantari-Johnson; Mayor Keeley.

Absent: None.

Staff: City Manager M. Huffaker, Assistant City Attorney C. Bronson, Deputy City Manager/Director of Economic Development B. Lipscomb, Director of Finance E. Cabell, Deputy City Clerk Administrator J. Wood, City Clerk Administrator B. Bush.

Statements of Disqualification – None.

Public Comment on Closed Session Items
Mayor Keeley opened the public comment period at 3:01 p.m. The following person spoke:

Corbin Szabo made a comment on item 1.2.

Mayor Keeley closed the public comment period at 3:02 p.m., at which time the meeting was closed to the public and Council adjourned to the Courtyard Conference Room.

5.1 April 14, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8224
Closed Session

1. Conference With Legal Counsel – Liability Claims (Government Code §54956.95) 1) Claimant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
2) Claimant: Corbin James Szabo
3) Claimant: Marco A. Martinez Diaz
Claims against the City of Santa Cruz
Council received a status report, took up under agenda item 11, and no reportable action was taken.

2. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (Government Code §54956.9(d)(4))
Initiation of litigation (one potential case)
Council authorized the City to enter into a settlement agreement with six regional opioid distributors/dispensers - Associated Pharmacies, Inc., American Associated Pharmacies, JM Smith Corporation, Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Morris & Dickson Co., North Carolina Mutual Wholesale Drug Company, and United Natural Foods, including direct and indirect subsidiaries. The City is expected to receive no more than $15,359.49 related to the opioid crisis and needs to spend those funds on abating the impacts of the opioid crisis.

3. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Government Code §54956.9(d)(1))
1) Christina Olsen v. John Balquist, et al
(Santa Cruz County Superior Court Case No. 25CV04087)
2) Brent Michael Campagnolo v. County of Santa Cruz, et al (Santa Cruz County Superior Court Case No. 23CV02945)
Council received a status report, and took no reportable action.

5.2 April 14, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8225
City of Santa Cruz
809 Center Street
Santa Cruz, California 95060

MINUTES OF A CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 14, 2026
3:45 PM
Call to Order – Mayor Keeley called the meeting to order at 3:45 p.m. in Council Chambers.

Roll Call

Present: Councilmembers Trigueiro, Brunner, Newsome, Golder, O’Hara; Vice Mayor Kalantari-Johnson; Mayor Keeley.

Absent: None.

Staff: City Manager M. Huffaker, Assistant City Manager M. Templeton, City Attorney C. Bronson, Deputy City Manager/Director of Economic Development B. Lipscomb, Director of Community Development L.

Butler (via Zoom), Director of Finance E. Cabell, Chief of Fire R. Oatey (via Zoom), Chief People Officer S. De Leon, Director of Information Technology K. Morgan, Director of Water H. Luckenbach, Deputy City Clerk Administrator J. Wood, City Clerk Administrator B. Bush.

Oral Communications
At 3:46 p.m. Mayor Keeley opened Oral Communications for members of the public who wished to speak regarding items not listed on the City Council agenda.

Unidentified person spoke regarding water rates and stabilization fees, noting that $22 million in funds have been diverted from the water fund calling it greedy and abusive.

James Ewing-Whitman spoke regarding Dance Week happening this week in Santa Cruz and a phased array antennae on Pacific Avenue.

Steve Landau spoke regarding Dark Sky Week and thanked Council for the Mayoral Proclamation that was issued.

Athena spoke regarding bodies and what it means to be human, and requested more access be provided for bathrooms and clean water at parks.

5.3 April 14, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8226
Oral Communications (continued)
Venus spoke regarding traffic safety on High Street and would like to see a protected left turn lane at the Bay Street intersection. [Unintelligible name] spoke regarding immigrant rights as a basic human necessity.

Samir Ghosh spoke regarding Dance Week in Santa Cruz, expressed concerns with future permitting for Salsa by the Sea, and asked Council to direct the Parks and Recreation Department to work with its organizers.

At 4:01 p.m. Mayor Keeley closed Oral Communications.

Presentations

4. Mayoral Proclamation Declaring April, 2026, as Sexual Assault Awareness Month Councilmember Trigueiro read from a proclamation declaring April, 2026 as Sexual Assault Awareness Month. Karen Madura, Chair of the Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women, spoke.

5. Mayoral Proclamation Declaring March 23—27, 2026, as Government Finance Professionals Week
Vice Mayor Kalantari-Johnson read from a proclamation declaring March 23— 27, 2026 as Government Finance Professionals Week. Director of Finance E.

Cabell spoke.

Presiding Officer's Announcements – Mayor Keeley spoke regarding the passing of Rod Diridon. By consensus Council directed staff to write a letter to Rod’s family reflecting on Rod’s life and expressing Council’s condolences.

Statements of Disqualification – None.

Additions and Deletions – None.

City Attorney Report on Closed Session – See page 8224 for the report.

Council Meeting Calendar

6. The City Council reviewed and did not revise the meeting calendar attached to the agenda.

5.4 April 14, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8227
Consent Agenda
Councilmember O’Hara made a comment on items 8 and 9.

Vice Mayor Kalantari-Johnson made a comment on items 9, 10 and 12.

Councilmember Brunner made a comment on items 8, 9 and 20.

Councilmember Trigueiro made a comment on items 9 and 12.

Mayor Keeley opened the public comment period. The following people spoke:

James Ewing-Whitman made a comment on items 9, 10, 11, 19, and 20.

Unidentified person made a comment on items 22 and 12.

Rhonda Reyna made a comment on item 9.

Karen Madura made a comment on item 9.

Mayor Keeley closed the public comment period.

MOTION: Vice Mayor Kalantari-Johnson moved, seconded by Councilmember Brunner, to approve the Consent Agenda.

ACTION: The motion carried unanimously with the following vote.

AYES: Councilmembers Trigueiro, Brunner, Newsome, Golder, O’Hara; Vice Mayor Kalantari-Johnson; Mayor Keeley.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: None.

DISQUALIFIED: None.

5.5 April 14, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8228
Consent Agenda (continued)

7. Minutes of the March 24, 2026 City Council Meeting (CC) LOCATION: None
Motion carried to approve as submitted.

8. Evaluation of City Advisory Bodies (CM)
LOCATION: Citywide
Motion carried to:
 Direct staff to identify funding for and select a consultant from the City’s existing On-Call Business Consulting Services list and proceed with awarding a contract to conduct the evaluation of City advisory bodies and develop recommendations for City Council consideration; and
 Authorize and direct the City Manager to execute an agreement in a form to be approved by the City Attorney. The Assistant City Manager is authorized to execute contract amendments within the approved project budget.

9. Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women and Santa Cruz Police Department 2025 Joint Annual Report (CM)
LOCATION: Citywide
Motion carried to receive the Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women and Santa Cruz Police Department 2025 Joint Annual Report and provide direction as necessary.

5.6 April 14, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8229
Consent Agenda (continued)

10. Report on the City’s Operating Principles and Leverage Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Enhanced City Government Services (CN)
LOCATION: Citywide
Motion carried to:
 Recognize the attached Administrative Procedure Order (APO) I-82.4, Artificial Intelligence (AI) Appropriate Use Policy, which governs the use of artificial intelligence systems by City employees and City Council; and  Direct staff to:
1) Conduct an annual review and update of the I-82.4 AI Appropriate Use Policy, ensuring that governance structures, internal policies, and industry standards evolve in a measured and risk-aware manner; 2) Maintain and regularly update the City’s published AI Transparency webpage to ensure public access to current information regarding AI tools in use; and
3) Continue exploring practical AI applications while assessing organizational readiness, with a focus on staff training and development, infrastructure planning, and budget alignment to support responsible adoption.

11. Liability Claims Filed Against the City of Santa Cruz (FN) Motion carried to reject the liability claims of 1) State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 2) Corbin James Szabo, and 3) Marco A. Martinez Diaz, based on staff recommendation.

12. Workforce Housing Affordability Act of 2025 Financial Oversight Committee (FN)
Location: Citywide
Motion carried to appoint Finance Director Elizabeth Cabell, Carrie Birkhofer, CEO of Bay Federal Credit Union, and Elaine Johnson, NAACP, Housing Santa Cruz County Executive Director, to serve on the Financial Oversight Committee.

5.7 April 14, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8230
Consent Agenda (continued)

13. Amending the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations (HR) LOCATION: Citywide
Resolution No. NS-30,641 was adopted amending City Personnel Rule 5.6: Class of Appointments to Modify the Definition of Limited-Term Appointments.

14. 212 Locust Street/117 Union Street Roofing Restoration Project – Notice of Completion (PW)
LOCATION: District 4
Motion carried to accept the work of Weather Proofing Technologies (WTI) DBA Tremco (Beachwood, OH) as completed per plans and specifications, authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion for the Locust/Union Roofing Restoration Project (c701907) and authorizing the Public Works Director to sign the Notice of Completion as the Owner’s Authorized Agent.

15. Award Contract for Outside Repair Services to City Assets (TEC Equipment) – Budget Adjustment (PW)
LOCATION: Citywide
Motion carried to:
 Authorize a contract with TEC Equipment, Inc. (Los Angeles, CA) in the amount of $195,000 for outside repairs to City fleet assets; and  Adopt Resolution No. NS-30,642 amending the FY 2026 budget to appropriate funds in the amount of $100,000 for outside repairs to City fleet assets.

16. Contract for Wastewater Treatment Facility Purchase of Vapex Odor Control Units (PW)
LOCATION: Citywide
Motion carried to award the purchase of three Vapex Micro Odor Control Units from Govapex Guardian Ozone and Vapex Environmental, LLC (Cocoa, FL) in the amount of $461,587. The Public Works Director (or designee) is authorized to approve future Contract Amendments within the approved project budget.

5.8 April 14, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8231
Consent Agenda (continued)

17. Award Contract for Outside Repair Services to Citywide Assets (Kelley’s Services) – Budget Adjustment (PW)
LOCATION: Citywide
Motion carried to:
 Authorize a contract with Kelley’s Services, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA) in the amount of $155,000 for City fleet vehicle and machinery parts purchases; and
 Adopt Resolution No. NS-30,643 to amend the FY 2026 budget to appropriate funds in the amount of $55,000 for outside repairs to Citywide fleet assets.

18. Fleet Vehicle Tire Repairs and Purchases – Change Order (PW) LOCATION: Citywide
Motion carried to authorize a change order in the amount of $70,000 for City fleet vehicle tire repairs and purchases.

19. Purchase of Front Loader Refuse Truck (PW)
LOCATION: Citywide
Motion carried to authorize the purchase of one CNG Front Loader refuse truck from Western Truck Parts and Equipment (Sacramento, CA) in the amount of $630,000.

20. Murray Street Bridge Seismic and Barrier Rail Construction (c402519) – Budget Adjustment to Align Expenditures and Reimbursements Anticipated for the Current Fiscal Year (PW)
LOCATION: District 2
Resolution No. NS-30,644 was adopted amending the FY 2026 budget to appropriate funds in the amount of $39,865,571 for the Murray Street Bridge – Construction Phase Project (c402519).

5.9 April 14, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8232
Consent Agenda (continued)

21. Graham Hill Water Treatment Plant Concrete Tanks Replacement Project – Budget Adjustment (WT)
LOCATION: County
Resolution No. NS-30,645 was adopted amending the FY 2026 budget in the amount of $1,500,000 and authorizing the transfer of funds within the Water Department’s Capital Investment Program from Project C702304 (Branciforte Streambank Restoration) in the amount of $700,000 and Project C701806 (River Bank Filtration Study) in the amount of $800,000 to Project C701501 (GHWTP Concrete Tanks Replacement Project) to fund additional work necessary to complete the project.

22. Cooperative Water Transfer and Purchase Agreement Between the City of Santa Cruz and the Scotts Valley Water District (WT)
LOCATION: County
Motion carried to authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperative Water Transfer and Purchase Agreement between the City of Santa Cruz (the City) and the Scotts Valley Water District for the operation of the Intertie 1 Project.

End Consent Agenda

5.10 April 14, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8233
Public Hearings

23. 2nd Reading and Final Adoption of Ordinance No. 2026-09 Amending Section

16.15.050 of the Santa Cruz Municipal Code Pertaining to Cross-Connection Control and Backflow Protection (WT)
LOCATION: Citywide
Mayor Keeley opened the public comment period. There were no speakers.

Mayor Keeley closed the public comment period.

MOTION: Councilmember O’Hara moved, seconded by Councilmember Newsome, to adopt Ordinance No. 2026-09 amending 16.15.050 of the Santa Cruz Municipal Code pertaining to cross-connection control and backflow protection to replace reference to Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations with reference to the California Health and Safety Code.

ACTION: The motion carried unanimously with the following vote.

AYES: Councilmembers Trigueiro, Brunner, Newsome, Golder, O’Hara; Vice Mayor Kalantari-Johnson; Mayor Keeley.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: None.

DISQUALIFIED: None.

Council took a break at 4:45 p.m. and returned at 5:02 p.m.

5.11 April 14, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8234
General Business (continued)

24. Proposed City Charter Amendments (CC)
LOCATION: Citywide
City Clerk Administrator B. Bush gave a presentation and responded to Council questions.

Mayor Keeley opened the public comment period. The following people spoke.

James Ewing-Whitman
Garrett
Mayor Keeley closed the public comment period.

MOTION: Councilmember O’Hara moved, seconded by Councilmember Trigueiro, to direct staff to prepare a second public hearing on May 26, 2026.

ACTION: The motion carried unanimously with the following vote.

AYES: Councilmembers Trigueiro, Brunner, Newsome, Golder, O’Hara; Vice Mayor Kalantari-Johnson; Mayor Keeley.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: None.

DISQUALIFIED: None.

Adjournment – Councilmember Golder moved, seconded by Councilmember Trigueiro, to adjourn. By consensus City Council adjourned at 5:30 p.m.

5.12 April 14, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8235
Respectfully Submitted:

Julia Wood, Deputy City Clerk Administrator
Attest:

Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
Approved:

Fred Keeley, Mayor

5.13 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/02/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: City Council
SUBJECT: Consideration of Permanent Display of the Progress Pride Flag and Transgender Pride Flag at the Council Dais (CN)
LOCATION: District 4
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the permanent display of the Progress Pride Flag and the Transgender Pride Flag at the City Council dais, alongside the United States flag, the State of California flag, and any other regularly displayed flags.

BACKGROUND: Since Council approval in May 2020, the City has displayed the Progress Pride Flag and the Transgender Pride Flag during Pride Month. Their presence served as a visible affirmation of the City’s commitment to inclusion, dignity, and belonging for LGBTQIA+ community members.

Santa Cruz has long demonstrated leadership in advancing equity and embracing diversity. The temporary display of these flags was met with strong community support and reflected the lived values of many residents.

DISCUSSION: Symbols are important. The flags displayed at the Council dais communicate, both to those in the room and to those watching from afar, who is seen, valued, welcomed, and included in civic life.

Making the Progress Pride Flag and the Transgender Pride Flag a permanent part of the dais would:
 Affirm the City’s ongoing commitment to LGBTQIA+ inclusion and visibility  Signal to residents, especially youth, that they belong in this community  Align with the City’s broader equity and inclusion goals  Build on a precedent already established during Pride Month This action is simple, no-cost, and highly meaningful. It reflects not only a moment in time, but an enduring commitment to ensuring all members of the community feel recognized and respected.

6.1 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: This action is not a project under the CEQA because it will not “cause a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Public Resources Code § 21065.)
HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): Adoption of this resolution reiterates the City’s commitment to supporting the equity HiAP pillar by promoting inclusivity and diversity.

FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: No

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: None.

Submitted By:

Gabriela Trigueiro
Councilmember, District 1
Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson
Vice Mayor, District 3
Sonja Brunner
Councilmember, District 2
ATTACHMENTS:

1. RESOLUTION.DOCX

6.2 RESOLUTION NO. NS-XX,XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ

AUTHORIZING THE PERMANENT DISPLAY OF THE PROGRESS PRIDE FLAG AND

THE TRANSGENDER PRIDE FLAG AT THE CITY COUNCIL DAIS
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Cruz is committed to fostering a community that is inclusive, equitable, and welcoming to all residents; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes and values the diversity of its residents, including individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, nonbinary, and other identities within the LGBTQIA+ community; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously authorized the display of the Progress Pride Flag and the Transgender Pride Flag at the Council dais during Pride Month as a symbol of support, visibility, and belonging; and
WHEREAS, the display of these flags was met with community support and reflects the City’s long-standing commitment to inclusion, dignity, and respect for all people; and WHEREAS, symbols displayed in civic spaces communicate the values of the City and signal to residents and visitors alike who is recognized and welcomed in public life; and WHEREAS, making the display of the Progress Pride Flag and the Transgender Pride Flag permanent at the Council dais affirms the City’s ongoing commitment to LGBTQIA+ inclusion and the well-being of all community members, particularly youth; and WHEREAS, the cost associated with the procurement and maintenance of these flags is minimal and can be accommodated within existing City resources; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz as follows:

1. The City Council hereby authorizes the permanent display of the Progress Pride Flag and the Transgender Pride Flag at the City Council dais, alongside the United States flag, the State of California flag, and any other flags customarily displayed.

2. The City Manager, or their designee, is directed to ensure the appropriate placement, maintenance, and replacement of these flags as needed.

3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.

6.3 RESOLUTION NO. NS-XX,XXX
2 PASSED AND ADOPTED this XX day of April, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: ______________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

6.4 Brittany Inclan
From: Garrett <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2026 4:58 PM
To: City Council
Subject: 4.28.2026 Agenda Item #6 (could this idea be any dumber, I think not, item)

4.28.2026 Agenda Item #6 (could this idea be any dumber, I think not item) Dear so so brain damaged council,
This item is clear confirmation you have no idea what you are doing and apparently WAY too much time on your hands.

Permanent display of "progress", rainbow and trans flags in the council chamber is about the stupidest idea you have ever devised, and shows you are clueless as to the priorities of how you should be spending your time. What "progress" is still pending? Cutting off children's private parts in public? The MIA flag will never see any such respect from the likes of you and in fact if it was on a flag pole with the state flag it would fly higher by law.

You have never shown any respect for the American flag during pride month flag displays in the past because there is something called "flag protocol" where when flags are split across the dais or stage, the American flag is ALWAYS higher and LEFTMOST and flags then are displayed in descending priority left to right, are lower, and the flags you mention would have to be the furthest right and smaller. The except is for when flags are all together then different protocol exists.

You have always then placed the trans flag, when it is shown for reasons that escape me, in SUPERIOR position to the American flag (leftmost), so you show your TOTAL IGNORANCE and DISRESPECT for America and its symbols.

Kind of similar to never saying the pledge of Allegiance. Flag disrespect. Country disrespect.

I could write quite a bit about this, but it would be wasted on this crew. (However, it might draw a more colorful crowd than usual, might be worth attending just for that.) Just don't pass out any plugs for the kids to play with.

Garrett Philipp

6.5 Brittany Inclan
From: Judi Grunstra <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2026 5:22 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Consent agenda item 6
Dear Mayor and Council:

I believe in the civil rights of everyone.

I request that this item be pulled from the Consent Agenda because it deserves discussion. However, with two council members running for re-election, it is guaranteed to pass. A fairer plan would be to bring it back to Council after the November elections, so that there can be an honest discussion, not one constrained by fear of offending would-be voters.

The decision (or Resolution) to display these flags on a permanent basis opens up requests by any number of groups who feel marginalized who might have a flag and wish it displayed permanently in Council chambers, now and into the future. What was once Pride Day has expanded into Pride Month but apparently that was not enough. What matters far more are the city's many existing policies that reinforce respect and quality.

So allow those flags to appear during the month of June, Pride Month, as they did last year, but not permanently. This request is a step too far.

Thank you.

Judi Grunstra

6.6 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/16/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: City Council
SUBJECT: Proposed Resolution Regarding Use of City-Owned Facilities for Civil Immigration Enforcement Activities, Emergency Preparedness, and SB 580 Compliance (CN)
LOCATION: Citywide
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to adopt a resolution to:
1) Prohibit the use of City-owned facilities for civil immigration enforcement activities; 2) Direct City staff to continue emergency preparedness and continuity planning related to potential impacts on City services and facilities; and
3) Direct staff to prepare for compliance with Senate Bill 580 (Government Code § 12532.5).

BACKGROUND: The City of Santa Cruz (City) is home to a culturally rich and diverse immigrant community that plays a central role in the City's social fabric and economic vitality.

The City owns and manages a range of public facilities and buildings that are intended for community use and public services. The Council is aware of instances in other jurisdictions where publicly owned facilities have been considered for, or used in connection with, civil immigration enforcement activities, and seeks to clarify City policy on the use of its facilities to allow for consistent management and continued community access.

The City also maintains ongoing emergency preparedness and continuity planning to ensure that essential services can continue during unexpected events that may affect residents or access to City services and facilities.

In addition, Senate Bill 580 (SB 580), codified at Government Code § 12532.5, requires the California Attorney General to publish model policies by July 1, 2026, regarding local agency interaction with immigration authorities. Local agencies must implement the model policy or an equivalent by January 1, 2027.

DISCUSSION: The proposed resolution provides policy direction regarding the use of Cityowned facilities and directs staff to take appropriate steps to ensure preparedness and compliance

7.1 with state law. The resolution is intended to clarify City policy, support consistent management of City resources, and maintain continuity of public services.

The resolution addresses three primary areas:

1. Use of City-Owned Facilities
The resolution establishes that City-owned facilities – including parks, open space, parking lots, garages, and buildings – will not be used for civil immigration enforcement activities. This policy is intended to preserve City facilities for their primary community-serving purposes and to provide clear, consistent direction to City staff on the use of public property.

2. Emergency Preparedness and Continuity Planning
The resolution directs staff to continue emergency preparedness and continuity planning to address potential impacts on residents and public access to City services and facilities. This includes planning for situations where external activities may affect access to City facilities, disrupt services, or require a coordinated City response.

This direction is consistent with the City’s ongoing responsibility to maintain continuity of operations, support public access to services, and provide clear communication during periods of disruption.

3. SB 580 Compliance
The resolution directs staff to prepare for compliance with SB 580 (Government Code § 12532.5). This includes reviewing the California Attorney General’s forthcoming model policy, evaluating whether to adopt it or an equivalent policy, and assessing any necessary updates to City practices.

Staff will return to Council, as needed, with recommendations to ensure compliance with state law prior to the January 1, 2027 deadline.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: The proposed Council action is not a “project” under CEQA.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): The proposed resolution advances a Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach by recognizing that decisions about City property management and emergency preparedness can have downstream impacts on community safety and well-being, particularly for residents who may be disproportionately affected by civil immigration enforcement activity. By prohibiting the use of City-owned facilities as staging areas, bases of operation, or processing locations for federal civil immigration activities, the resolution preserves parks, open space, parking facilities, and City buildings for their intended communityserving purposes and supports the City's stated goal of maintaining community trust in public spaces and local government.

7.2 FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: No

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: No impact.

Submitted By:

Gabriela Trigueiro
Councilmember, District 1
Susie O'Hara
Councilmember, District 5
Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson
Vice Mayor, District 3
ATTACHMENTS:

1. RESOLUTION.DOCX

7.3 RESOLUTION NO. NS-XX,XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ

PROHIBITING THE USE OF CITY-OWNED FACILITIES FOR CIVIL IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES; DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO CONTINUE EMERGENCY PREPARATIONS; AND DIRECTING STAFF RELATED TO SB 580 COMPLIANCE WHEREAS, the City of Santa Cruz (“City”) is home to a culturally rich and diverse immigrant community, who play a central role in the social fabric and economic vitality of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City is also home to numerous and various City-owned and maintained facilities, including parks, open space, parking lots, garages, and buildings; and WHEREAS, these facilities are community assets, and the City owns and maintains these facilities for the benefit of our community, as spaces the community can and should be able to enjoy and use safely; and
WHEREAS, the Council is aware of reports that in recent months, agencies of the federal government have considered or attempted to use publicly owned facilities in other communities (such as Chicago and Minneapolis) for immigration enforcement, an activity that is solely the responsibility of the federal government; and
WHEREAS, the use of City-owned facilities for federal immigration enforcement activities, including as staging areas for operations, bases for operations, or processing locations, is not the intended use of these community assets and, as such, undermines the community’s ability to enjoy these assets, while also undermining the City’s authority over its own property; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to prohibit use of City-owned facilities for civil immigration activities, in order to preserve City resources for their intended purpose and enable consistent management of City-owned facilities and public property, and to preserve trust in our community; and
WHEREAS, the City has faced many emergencies in recent years and takes pride in its emergency preparedness and its ability to coordinate across departments and promptly respond to emergencies; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that, if large scale immigration enforcement activities were to be conducted in the City of Santa Cruz, an emergency could arise in the City, as that term is defined in Santa Cruz Municipal Code § 2.20.020; and WHEREAS, the Council desires for staff to continue preparing for all emergencies that could impact the City, including a potential emergency arising from large scale federal immigration enforcement activities; and

7.4 RESOLUTION NO. NS-XX,XXX
2 WHEREAS, SB 580 (codified at Gov. Code § 12532.5) requires the California Attorney General to “publish model policies for . . . local agencies relating to interaction with immigration authorities consistent with federal and state law” before July 1, 2026. (Gov. Code § 12532.5(a)(1).) From there, local agencies have until January 1, 2027 to “implement the model policy or an equivalent policy” (Gov. Code § 12532.5(a)(2)); and
WHEREAS, the Council desires for staff to review the Attorney General’s forthcoming model policy on interacting with immigration authorities when it is published and determine whether to implement the Attorney General’s model policy or a different, but equivalent, policy related to immigration authority interactions, as required by SB 580.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz as follows:

1. No City-owned public facilities may be used as staging areas, bases for operations, or processing locations for federal immigration activities.

2. The provisions of this Resolution shall not impair any lease, license, or any other property interest or contractual restriction in existence as of the date of adoption of this Resolution.

3. The City Council confirms its understanding that State law requires that federal immigration officials possess a judicial warrant prior to entering any area of a City owned facility that is not generally, or at the time of entry, open to the public. Nothing in this Resolution shall be construed as restricting or interfering with the execution of valid judicial warrants or court orders from federal or State judicial officers or with the enforcement of any provisions of criminal law, nor as limiting the rights of any person or entity under State or federal law.

4. Nothing in this Resolution is intended to limit or prohibit any City, County, State, or federal officer or employee from investigating suspected violations of criminal law.

5. Enforcement of this Resolution shall be via civil, rather than criminal, procedures.

6. Staff is directed to continue preparing for all emergencies that could impact the City, including a potential emergency arising from large scale federal immigration enforcement activities.

7. Staff is directed to: (a) review the Attorney General’s forthcoming model policy on interacting with immigration authorities when it is published, and (b) determine whether to implement the Attorney General’s model policy or a different, but equivalent, policy related to immigration authority interactions, as required by SB 580.

7.5 RESOLUTION NO. NS-XX,XXX
3 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of April, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: ______________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

7.6 RESOLUTION NO. NS-XX,XXX
4 7.7
Brittany Inclan
From: Garrett <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2026 8:22 PM
To: City Council
Subject: 4.28.2026 Agenda Item # 7, non-co-operation with Federal Law enforcement

4.28.2026 Agenda Item # 7, non-co-operation with Federal Law enforcement "Dear" Council,
I see the same 3 council members with little to do except wave pride/trans flags around is at it again sponsoring this item.

While SB580 has passed, there currently is no sample policy to evaluate. It will be required that the city adopt the sample policy or and equivalent policy (achieves the same outcome) by next year, but again I point out YOU DON'T REALLY KNOW AS OF NOW WHAT THOSE ARE, DO YOU??? So, what's the rush? The sample policies will be known by July, but the city does not have to have a policy or equivalent in place until next year.

Seems like you are operating on the false assumption you can foretell the future, but REALLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE DOING as of yet what the sample policy will be, or what is equivalent.

Sure you can guess and are guessing here. It's not your job to put guesses into law.

I would remind you who CLAIM to protect public health and welfare, note any illegal who commits a crime, or is arrested of a crime, or is in custody for that, and also has a valid deportation order, for the good and safety of the community should be deported and thus co-operate with ICE. To not do so means you don't really care about community safety, health or welfare.

If illegal aliens commit crimes, YOU are responsible for the injury to the community.

If illegal aliens such up city resources, YOU are responsible for this insult to hard working Americans.

Yes, you.

Deport them all. They are all criminals.

Garrett Philipp

7.8 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/09/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: Economic Development
SUBJECT: Third Amendment to the Municipal Wharf Lease Agreement with Marshall Miller and Kathryn Miller for City-Owned Commercial Space at 17-D Municipal Wharf (ED)
LOCATION: District 4
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Third Amendment to the Municipal Wharf Lease Agreement with Marshall Miller and Kathryn Miller and any related documents in a form to be approved by the City Attorney, for the commercial retail space located at 17-D Municipal Wharf;
2) Authorize the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Lease, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to be recorded in the Santa Cruz County Recorder’s Office; and 3) Adopt a finding of categorical exemption pursuant to the following CEQA guidelines: 14 CCR 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 14 CCR 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption).

BACKGROUND: On April 10, 1984, Marshall and Kathryn Miller and James and Nancy Thrasher entered into a Municipal Wharf Lease Agreement for the premises now known as 17-D Municipal Wharf. The lease provided for the operation of a 1,460 square-foot retail clothing and gift store known as Sunshops. After a series of partnership changes and dissolutions, the Millers entered a new lease on June 28, 1995 doing business as the Santa Cruz Bay Company. On February 1, 2022, the Millers entered into a new Municipal Wharf Lease Agreement extending the term to January 31, 2021, and later further extended the term to February 1, 2026. The tenant is now operating month-to-month.

DISCUSSION: In addition to operating the Santa Cruz Bay Company, the Millers own and operate the Surf Life retail gift store at 17-A Municipal Wharf. Both businesses contribute positively to the overall Wharf experience, and the Millers are responsible tenants. The Millers are now requesting a lease extension for Santa Cruz Bay Company. Staff recommends approving the third amendment to extend the term to January 31, 2031 and updating applicable terms and conditions to meet current City practices. The current rent is the greater of the minimum base rent or 10% of adjusted gross sales and 1% of adjusted gross sales towards the

8.1 capital improvement fund. The minimum base rent is subject to an annual adjustment of two percent (2%). The minimum base rent of $4,796.77 per month is expected to yield minimum annual revenues in the amount of $57,561.24. This amendment does not modify the rent terms.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: The proposed City Council action does not meet the definition of “project” under CEQA, as codified in Public Resources Code Section 21065.

To the extent any of the proposed City Council actions are deemed a project, they are exempt from CEQA under: (1) 14 CCR 15301 – Class 1 Categorical Exemption because the City Council action relates to the lease of an existing facility involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use; and (2) 14 CCR 15061 (b)(3) as an activity that, with certainty, does not have an effect on the environment.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): Promoting locally owned businesses helps support social and community bonds, improves community economic resilience, reduces commute times and pollution from owner operators, and generally aligns business activities with local culture and initiatives. While these factors may not in themselves influence public health, they have been shown to have a positive impact on the social determinants of health and support the overall well-being in the community.

FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: No

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: Lease revenue from the commercial space is maintained in Municipal Wharf Fund (Fund 104) and helps support ongoing maintenance operations of the Wharf. Should sales exceed the minimum base rent, the percentage rent would increase the revenue. Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 319) contributions are collected in the capital investment project, 17-D Municipal Wharf (w511101), dedicated to support ongoing property improvement and capital needs related to the premises.

Prepared By:

Jennifer Shelton
Principal Management
Analyst
Submitted By:

Bonnie Lipscomb
Deputy City Manager
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. THIRD AMENDMENT WITH THE MILLERS.PDF

8.2 THIRD AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL WHARF LEASE AGREEMENT
This Third Amendment (“Third Amendment”) to the February 1, 2011 Municipal Wharf Lease Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into on ___________ (the “Effective Date”), by and between the City of Santa Cruz (“Landlord”) and Marshall Miller and Kathryn Miller (“Tenant”). Landlord and Tenant are sometimes hereinafter referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, on February 1, 2011, Landlord and Tenant entered into a ten (10) year Agreement for the premises located at 17-D Municipal Wharf, Santa Cruz, CA 95060.

B. WHEREAS, on March 21, 2011, Landlord and Tenant entered into the First Amendment to the Agreement to delete all references to and occurrences of the term “License Area” from the Agreement.

C. WHEREAS, the Agreement expired on February 1, 2021 and Tenant operated on a month-tomonth basis until the date of the Second Amendment.

D. WHEREAS, on October 15, 2024, the Parties entered into a Second Amendment to the Agreement to extend the term, provide information regarding the status of a Certified Access Specialist inspection, and update the indemnification and insurance requirements and certain other provisions.

E. WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement expired on February 1, 2026 and Landlord acknowledges that Tenant remained in possession of the Premises following the expiration of the Agreement through the effective date of this Third Amendment (the “Holdover Period”).

Pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Agreement, Landlord hereby consents to Tenant’s possession of the Premises during the Holdover Period and agrees that the Minimum Annual Rent and Minimum Monthly Payments payable during the Holdover Period shall be at the rate in effect immediately prior to the expiration of the Agreement, and not at the holdover rate specified in Section 3.03.

F. WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Third Amendment to the Agreement to extend the term of the Agreement to January 31, 2031, as well as update provisions regarding reservations of leasehold rights, notices, Tenant’s maintenance obligations, and damage or destruction, and add new provisions regarding wharf closures, relocations and surrender of premises, and prevailing wage.

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES TO INCORPORATE THE ABOVE RECITALS HERETO, AND THE PARTIES FURTHER AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING:

1. Section 2.03 “Reservations” is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

2.03 Reservations of Leasehold Rights. This Agreement is subject to any and all exceptions, easements, rights, rights-of-way, and other matters of record affecting the Premises, structures or other improvements on the Premises, and land of which the Premises are a part, and such other matters as are apparent from an inspection of the Premises (including, but not limited to, existing easements, servitudes and right-of-ways for roads, telephone, and electric power lines and facilities, pipelines, and other purposes whether recorded or not). This Agreement confers no rights either with regard to the subsurface of the water or land below the ground level of the Premises or with

8.3 2
regard to airspace above the roof of the Premises. Easements for light and air are not granted in this Agreement. Tenant shall have no rights in, the Municipal Wharf of Santa Cruz (the “Wharf”), or the Wharf decking, pilings, substructure, and support elements underlying or surrounding the Premises.

Landlord reserves and shall at all times have the right to make inspections, alterations, repairs, improvements, and/or additions to the Premises and the Wharf and all associated structures, including, but not limited to, areas and structures under and/or affecting the Premises; and, to conduct or perform any obligations or duties assigned or assumed to be the responsibility under this Agreement or applicable law. Landlord also reserves the right to construct other buildings or improvements on the Wharf and to make alterations or additions thereto. Landlord further reserves the right to enter and access the roof of any buildings and/or structures on and/or comprising the Premises, or to repair and maintain the roof, and to use any space within the walls, above the ceiling finish, beneath the floor surface, and under the Premises for purposes including, but not limited to, inspections, utility lines and conduits, and/or Wharf operation and maintenance. Tenant hereby waives any claims for damage against Landlord (including, but not limited to, those arising from loss of business) by reason of Landlord’s entry onto the Wharf and/or removal of all of any portion of any structure or building on the Wharf for the purposes of making repairs, alterations, improvements and/or additions. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, when exercising the rights reserved under this Section, Landlord shall not unreasonably disturb or interfere with Tenant’s quiet enjoyment of the Premises.

2. Section 2.05 “Wharf Closure” is hereby added to the Agreement as follows:

2.05 Wharf Closure. Tenant acknowledges and understands that the Wharf may be subject to closure (either full or partial) due to conditions, events, or other public health, welfare, and safety reasons in Landlord’s sole discretion, including, but not limited to, ocean conditions (including, but not limited to, high surf), waterfront and/or weather related conditions, as well as Force Majeure events (as defined in Section 19.06 (Force Majeure)) (collectively “Closure Conditions”). Tenant enters into this Agreement with full knowledge of the existing conditions of the Wharf and Closure Conditions, and with the understanding that at any point during the Term (as defined in Article 3), Landlord may close the Wharf and/or Premises to public and Tenant access and use (including, but not limited to Tenant’s access and/or use) due to Closure Conditions, without any liability to Tenant by virtue of such closure and/or related actions. Notwithstanding the forgoing, Landlord reserves the right to establish policies for Tenant relief and compensation but in no event shall Landlord be obligated to do so. During any such period of Wharf closure where Tenant is completely unable to access and use the Premises, Tenant shall not be liable to Landlord for damages for failure to operate pursuant to Section 4.09 (Damages For Failure To Operate).

3. Section 2.06 “Relocation of Premises” is hereby added to the Agreement as follows:

2.06 Relocation of Premises. Landlord shall have the right, at Landlord’s sole discretion, during the term of this Agreement and any extensions thereof, to relocate Tenant to other premises (“New Premises”) on the Wharf comparable to the Premises in accordance with the following:
(a) For the purposes of this Section “comparable” shall mean New Premises of reasonably similar size to the Premises to the extent that such alternate property is available or made available within the timeline described in Section 2.06(b). In the event that the New Premises varies in square footage, rent pursuant to Article 4 shall be adjusted by the same square footage rate. (b) Except in a case of an emergency, such as the destruction of the Premises, Landlord shall give Tenant at least one hundred eighty (180) days’ notice of Landlord’s intention to relocate the Premises (“Notice of Intent to Relocate”) and at least ninety (90) days’ notice (“Relocation

8.4 3
Notice”) of the estimated date of relocation (“Relocation Date”), and the location of the New Premises. Tenant shall have ten (10) days following the date of the Relocation Notice to accept in writing regarding the relocation to the New Premises. In the event that Tenant fails to so accept the New Premises within such ten-day period, this Agreement shall be terminated ninety (90) days following the date of the Relocation Notice to Tenant and Tenant shall have ninety (90) days following the date of the Relocation Notice to vacate and surrender the current Premises. Should Tenant accept the New Premises within such ten-day period, Tenant shall have ninety (90) days following the date of the Relocation Notice to complete the move to the New Premises. (c) Landlord shall not require Tenant to relocate during the period between May 15 through September 15 of each calendar year, except in a case of an emergency.

(d) Tenant shall be responsible for vacating the current Premises and relocating all of Tenant’s trade fixtures, furniture, equipment, inventory, and other personal property (collectively “Personal Property”) to the New Premises no later than the Relocation Date. Tenant shall submit to Landlord within sixty (60) days of Landlord’s issuance of the Notice of Intent to Relocate a schedule itemizing Tenant’s anticipated costs to relocate Tenant’s Personal Property. Landlord shall review said schedule and may provide Tenant a moving allowance (“Moving Allowance”), the amount of which shall be determined by Landlord at Landlord’s sole discretion. Such Moving Allowance shall cover the reasonable cost of relocating Tenant’s Personal Property to the New Premises, said payment to be made to Tenant following Landlord’s receipt of correct invoices for the expenses actually incurred by Tenant (in form satisfactory to Landlord), provided Tenant submits such invoices within sixty (60) days after completion of Tenant’s move to the New Premises. Landlord shall reimburse Tenant the lesser of (a) the approved Moving Allowance or (b) Tenant’s actual relocation costs within thirty (30) days of Landlord’s receipt of Tenant’s correct and substantiated invoices, not to exceed the specified Moving Allowance. (e) If Tenant does not accept Landlord’s determination of the Moving Allowance, Tenant shall rescind Tenant’s acceptance of the New Premises and shall vacate and surrender the Premises no later than ninety (90) days following the date of the Relocation Notice to Tenant. (f) Tenant shall be responsible for the transfer of all Utilities and Services (as defined in Article 11 below) to the New Premises.
(g) Tenant shall be solely responsible for all other costs of remodeling, outfitting and furnishing the New Premises. At no time shall Landlord be obligated for other out-of-pocket expenses over and above the Moving Allowance or for downtime incurred by the Tenant or Tenant’s employees, representatives, and agents in the event of a relocation. Except as set forth in this Section 2.06 (Relocation of Premises), Tenant hereby releases, indemnifies, and holds harmless Landlord (and its officials, officers, directors, employees, agents, attorneys, volunteers, representatives, successors and assigns) from any and all losses, claims, injuries, damages, costs, expenses, fines, penalties, or other liability, of every kind and nature, including, but not limited to, consequential damages, whether to persons or property, no matter how caused, resulting from or in any manner related to or incidental to the relocation of the Premises pursuant to this Section 2.06 (Relocation of Premises), and Tenant expressly waives any right to claim that such relocation constitutes grounds for a claim of abatement of rent, constructive eviction, or for termination of this Agreement. (h) Landlord shall transfer Tenant’s contributions to the Premises’ Capital Improvement Fund to the New Premises’ Capital Improvement Fund.
(i) Effective as of the Relocation Date, Minimum Base Rent for the New Premises shall be calculated in accordance with Article 4 (Rent).

8.5 4
(j) Landlord and Tenant shall execute an amendment to this Agreement in a writing signed by both Parties acknowledging the relocation of the Premises to the New Premises and the terms and conditions thereof. Upon the effective date of the amendment, the term “Premises” in this Agreement shall refer to the New Premises.

4. Section 3.02 is amended such that the Term of the Agreement is hereby extended for an additional five (5) years, through January 31, 2031 for the Second Extended Term.

5. Section 3.04 “Surrender of Premises” is hereby added to the Agreement as follows:

3.04 Surrender of Premises.
(a) Surrender. On the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement, Tenant shall, at Tenant’s sole expense:
(i) surrender and vacate the Premises to Landlord in a clean, safe, sanitized, and in good order and condition, except for ordinary wear and tear; and, (ii) abate and remove all of Tenant’s Personal Property in compliance with Applicable Requirements; and repair all damage caused by such removal subject to the provisions of Section

9.05 (Trade Fixtures), Section 9.06 (Restoration), and this Section; and, (iii) restore the Premises to the condition existing as of the first day of the Term or better, without removing approved Tenant alterations or additions, reasonable wear and tear excepted, unless Landlord expressly requested their removal at Tenant’s sole cost and expense; and, (iv) render the Premises safe and free from debris and hazards, and without any reduction in value resulting from any conduct in violation of this Agreement; and (v) surrender all keys to the Premises to Landlord.

Tenant’s abatement and removal of its Personal Property on the Premises pursuant to this section shall be in compliance with all applicable laws, permits, certifications, approvals, permissions, and authorizations.
(b) Landlord’s Property. Landlord may remove, store, and dispose of any items Tenant does not remove from the Premises as permitted or required under this Agreement. (c) No Implied Acceptance of Surrender. Landlord’s acceptance of Tenant's surrender of the Premises will be valid and binding only if it is in a writing signed by Landlord, and no act by Landlord will be deemed to be Landlord's acceptance of Tenant's surrender. (d) Indemnity. Tenant shall reimburse Landlord and indemnify and hold harmless Landlord, and Landlord’s officers, officials, employees, and agents against any and all damages that Landlord incurs from Tenant’s delay in vacating and/or surrendering the Premises, removing and abating Tenant’s Personal Property, and/or restoring the Premises. This indemnification and hold harmless provision extends to any and all damages, costs, and expenses incurred by Landlord as a result of Tenant’s breach of the covenants contained herein with respect to the condition of the Premises at the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as provided in this Agreement. (e) Survival of Surrender Obligations. Tenant’s obligations under this Section will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

6. Section 9.04 “Notices” shall be amended to add the following language:

At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Tenant shall keep the Premises and all improvements now or hereafter located on the Premises free and clear of all liens and claims of liens for labor, services, materials, supplies, and/or equipment performed on or furnished to the

8.6 5
Premises. Tenant shall not suffer or permit any mechanics’ or materialmen’s lien, attachment, execution or similar liens or stop notices to attach to, or to be filed or levied against the Premises (including, but not limited to, the equipment or improvements located thereon) or against Landlord’s interest therein. Subject to the provisions this Section, if any such liens, stop notices, or similar proceedings are filed or commenced, Tenant shall, within twenty (20) days after notice of the filing, cause the same to be discharged of record by payment, deposit, order of court or by bonding. Subject to the provisions of this Section, should Tenant fail to pay and discharge or cause the Premises (and improvements now or hereafter located on the Premises) to be released from any such lien or claim of lien within twenty (20) days after notice of the filing of such lien or claim, Landlord shall have, in addition to all other remedies provided under this Agreement and/or applicable Law, the right (but not the obligation) to cause the same to be released by such means as Landlord shall deem proper (including, but not limited to, paying, adjusting, compromising, and/or discharging any such lien or claim on any terms and in any manner that Landlord may deem appropriate on behalf of the Tenant) and charge Tenant the costs incurred by Landlord as additional rent. In that event, Tenant shall, on or before the first day of the next calendar month following any such payment by Landlord, reimburse Landlord for the full amount paid by Landlord in paying, adjusting, compromising, and/or discharging that lien or claim of lien, including, but not limited to, any attorneys' fees or other costs expended by Landlord, together with interest at the thenmaximum legal rate from the date of payment by Landlord to the date of repayment by Tenant.

If Tenant desires to contest any lien of the nature set forth above, it shall notify Landlord of its intention to do so within ten (10) days after the filing of such lien, and Tenant shall furnish the bond required in California Civil Code § 8424 (or any comparable statute hereafter enacted) or otherwise cause such lien to be removed within twenty (20) days after it has been recorded against the Premises. Within five (5) days after the final determination of the validity thereof, Tenant shall satisfy and discharge such lien and the amount owed to the extent held valid, and all penalties, interest and cost in connection therewith, as the case may be. In the event of any such contest, Tenant shall indemnify, defend, and protect Landlord (and Landlord’s officers, employees, representatives, and agents) and the Premises (and improvements located or to be located thereon) against all loss, cost, expense and damage (including, but not limited to, attorney’s fees and costs) resulting therefrom. If Tenant fails to comply with foregoing provisions, Landlord may (but is not obligated to) do so on behalf of Tenant and charge the Tenant the costs incurred by Landlord as additional rent.

Tenant shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend (with counsel reasonably satisfactory to Landlord) Landlord (and Landlord’s officers, employees, representatives, and agents) from and against any and all liens and encumbrances arising out of any work performed or materials furnished by or at the direction of Tenant, as well as any loss, damage, attorneys’ fees and all other costs and expenses on account of claims of lien of laborers or materialmen or others for work performed or materials or supplies furnished to Tenant or persons claiming under Tenant. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed in any way as giving Tenant any right, power or authority to contract for or permit, on Landlord’s behalf or as to Landlord’s interest, the rendering of any services or the furnishing of any materials.

7. Section 10.03 “Tenant’s Maintenance Obligations” is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

10.03 Tenant’s Maintenance Obligations.
(a) Except as provided elsewhere in this Agreement or as expressly assigned to Landlord, Tenant, at its sole cost and expense, shall clean and maintain the Premises and any improvements in good order, condition and repair and shall make all replacements necessary to keep all portions of the Premises (including inside and outside) in a safe, clean, neat, and sanitary condition, including, but not limited to, maintenance, repair, and replacement of interior plumbing and fixtures and HVAC

8.7 6
systems. For the purposes of this Section, the term “Improvements” shall be inclusive of any such improvements on, in, at, about, from, or under the Premises, that are not otherwise the responsibility of the Landlord and those specified in Section 10.01. Without limiting the foregoing, Tenant’s maintenance obligations shall include, without limitation, the following:
(1) Cleaning the building sewer main and the sewer distribution system related to the Premises and Improvements located (or to be located) thereon with a roto-rooter system as needed. (2) Maintaining, without limitation, all plumbing fixtures and the plumbing system in the Premises and Improvements located (or to be located) thereon. (3) Steam-cleaning or pressure washing the pedestrian sidewalk fronting the Premises on a quarterly basis or upon Landlord’s request.
(4) Keeping and maintaining the sidewalk, ramp, and railings fronting the Premises in good condition and repair, free and clear of all obstacles, stands, dirt, mud, water, debris, rubbish, filth, and other encumbrances or obstructions, and safe and convenient for the use of the public. (5) Washing windows inside and out on a regular basis; maintaining flags, awnings and signs in a good condition; keeping lights operable; washing any fabric awnings regularly and repairing immediately if ripped or torn; removing graffiti immediately; cleaning and polishing regularly any brass or metallic hardware.
(6) Handling, recycling and/or disposing of all waste on, in, at, about, from, or under the Premises consistent with City’s applicable rules and regulations. (7) In the event, Tenant chooses to paint the exterior of the Premises, Tenant shall endeavor to conduct all exterior painting activities during typically rain free months (April through September); and, Tenant shall thereafter be responsible for maintenance of any such painted surfaces, except if reverting to City specified color and motif, at Landlord’s sole discretion. Tenant shall address any paint issues, and repaint surfaces as needed, within ninety (90) days of any request by Landlord.

Any painting of the building exterior shall require Landlord’s approval of color, material, and motif.
(b) All replacement equipment shall be of a quality, value and use equal to or exceeding that of the original equipment or Improvements. Should Tenant fail to promptly and diligently make these repairs and replacements or otherwise maintain and/or repair the Premises and Improvements located (or to be located) thereon for a period of three (3) days after delivery of a written demand by Landlord, Landlord shall have the right (but not the obligation) to make such repairs or replacements without liability to Tenant for any loss or damage that may occur to Tenant’s stock or business, and Tenant shall pay for all costs and expenses incurred by Landlord in making such repairs and/or replacements, together with interest thereon at the maximum rate permitted by law from the date of commencement of the work through the date of payment. Tenant shall, at its sole cost and expense, promptly and diligently repair any damage to the Premises, building(s) and/or Improvements located (or to be located) on the Premises, and/or the Wharf caused by Tenant, its officers, directors, employees, representatives, agents, volunteers, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, customers, invitees, subtenants, assignees, concessionaires, or others acting on Tenant’s behalf or under Tenant’s authority or control, or caused by the installation or removal of Tenant’s personal property.

8. Section 16 “Damage or Destruction” is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following Section 16 titled “Damage or Destruction; Condemnation”:

8.8 7

16.01 Repair of Damage by Landlord. Tenant agrees to notify Landlord in writing promptly of any damage to the Premises resulting from fire, earthquake, or any other identifiable event of a sudden, unexpected, or unusual nature (“Casualty”). If the Premises are damaged by a Casualty or any adjacent or surrounding common areas providing access to the Premises are damaged by a Casualty, such as but not limited to a Wharf closure as provided in Section 2.05 (Wharf Closure), and such that the Premises are untenantable, or Tenant does not have reasonable access to the Premises, provided that the Casualty was not caused by the negligence, gross negligence or willful misconduct of any Tenant’s employee, contractor, invitee, guest, licensee, contractor or subtenant (“Tenant Party”), and if neither Landlord nor Tenant has elected to terminate this Agreement, Landlord will promptly and diligently restore the Premises to substantially the same condition as existed before the Casualty, or to a condition that satisfies required buildings codes and other laws, or to a condition that is desirable by Landlord in its sole discretion. In making these modifications, Landlord will not materially impair Tenant’s access to the Premises. Landlord’s obligation to restore is subject to reasonable delays for insurance adjustment and other matters beyond Landlord’s reasonable control and subject to the other clauses of this Article 16.

16.02 Repair Period Notice. Landlord will provide written notice to Tenant indicating the anticipated period for repairing the Casualty (“Repair Period Notice”), within the later of: (a) sixty (60) days after the date on which Landlord determines the full extent of the damage caused by the Casualty, or (b) thirty (30) days after Landlord has determined the extent of the insurance proceeds available to effectuate repairs. The Repair Period Notice will also state, if applicable, Landlord’s election either to repair or to terminate the Agreement under Section 16.03 (Landlord’s Option to Terminate or Repair).

16.03 Landlord’s Option to Terminate or Repair. Landlord may elect either to terminate this Agreement or to effectuate repairs if:
(a) The Repair Period Notice estimates that the period for repairing the Casualty exceeds one (1) year from the date of the commencement of the repair;
(b) The estimated repair cost exceeds the available insurance proceeds, if any, for such repair (not including the deductible), plus any amount that Tenant is obligated to pay for, or elects to pay for such repair;
(c) The estimated repair cost of the Premises, even though covered by insurance, exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the full replacement cost of the Premises; or (d) The Premises cannot be restored except in a substantially different structural or architectural form than existed before the Casualty.

Landlord’s election will be stated in the Repair Period Notice.

16.04 Tenant’s Option to Terminate. If all or a substantial part of the Premises are rendered untenantable or inaccessible by damage to all or any part of the Premises from a Casualty, and Landlord does not elect to terminate as provided above, then Tenant may elect to terminate this Agreement if the Repair Period Notice provided by Landlord indicates that the anticipated period for repairing the Casualty exceeds one (1) year from the date of commencement of the repairs.

Tenant may elect to terminate this Agreement by providing written notice (“Tenant’s Termination Notice”) to Landlord within thirty (30) days after receiving the Repair Period Notice from Landlord. If Tenant does not elect to terminate within this thirty-day (30-day) period, Tenant will be considered to have waived the option to terminate. Tenant will not have an option to terminate if Tenant is in default under this Agreement and the Casualty was caused in part or in whole by the

8.9 8
fault of any Tenant Party, including negligence, gross negligence or willful misconduct of any Tenant Party.

16.05 Rent Abatement Due to Casualty. Landlord and Tenant agree that, if the Casualty was not the result of the negligence, gross negligence, or willful misconduct of any Tenant Party, and provided that Tenant is not then in default under this Agreement, Tenant will be provided with a proportionate abatement of rent based on the rented square footage of the Premises rendered unusable (due to physical damage to the Premises or the unavailability of access to the Premises) and not used by Tenant. That proportional abatement, if any, will be provided during the period beginning on the later of: (a) the date of the Casualty, or (b) the date on which Tenant ceases to occupy the Premises and ending on the date of substantial completion of Landlord’s restoration obligations as provided in this Article 16. Subject to Section 16.04 (Tenant’s Option to Terminate), the rent abatement provided in this Section16.05 is Tenant’s sole remedy due to the occurrence of the Casualty. Landlord will not be liable to Tenant or any other person or entity for any direct, indirect, or consequential damage (including but not limited to lost profits of Tenant or loss of or interference with Tenant’s business), whether or not caused by the negligence of Landlord or Landlord’s employees, contractors, licensees, or invitees, due to, arising out of, or as a result of the Casualty (including but not limited to the termination of the Agreement in connection with the Casualty).

16.06 Damage Near End of Term. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article 16, if the Premises is destroyed or damaged by a Casualty during the last eighteen (18) months of the Term of this Agreement, Landlord has the option to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Tenant consistent with the Repair Period Notice.

16.07 Effective Date of Termination and Rent Apportionment. If Landlord or Tenant elects to terminate this Agreement under this Article 16 in connection with a Casualty, the termination will be effective thirty (30) days after delivery of notice of such election. Tenant must pay rent, properly apportioned up to the date of the Casualty or Tenant’s cessation of revenue generating business activities from the Premises, whichever is later. After the effective date of the termination, Landlord and Tenant will be discharged of all future obligations under this Agreement, except for those provisions that, by their terms, survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.

16.08 Waiver of Statutory Provisions. The provisions of this Agreement, including those in this Article 16, constitute an express agreement between Landlord and Tenant that applies in the event of any Casualty to the Premises. Landlord and Tenant, therefore, each fully waives the provisions of any statute or regulation, including California Civil Code §§1932(2) and 1933(4), or any successor statute, relating to any rights or obligations concerning a Casualty.

16.09 Condemnation. If the Premises or any portion thereof are taken under the power of eminent domain or sold under the threat of the exercise of said power (collectively "Condemnation"), this Agreement shall terminate as to the part taken as of the date the condemning authority takes title or possession, whichever first occurs. If more than twenty-five percent (25%) of that portion of the Premises is taken by Condemnation, Tenant may, at Tenant’s option, to be exercised in writing within ten (10) days after Landlord shall have given Tenant written notice of such taking (or in the absence of such notice, within ten (10) days after the condemning authority shall have taken possession) terminate this Agreement as of the date the condemning authority takes such possession. If Tenant does not terminate this Agreement in accordance with the foregoing, this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as to the portion of the Premises remaining, except that the Minimum Annual Rent shall be reduced in proportion to the reduction in utility of the Premises caused by such Condemnation. Except as provided herein, Landlord shall be entitled to receive all compensation and anything of value awarded, paid, or received in settlement or otherwise related to any Condemnation (“Award”) and Tenant irrevocably assigns and transfers to

8.10 9
Landlord all rights to and interests in the Award, including, without limitation, any amount attributable to any excess of the market value of the Premises for the remainder of the Term over the present value as of the termination date of the Rent payable for the remainder of the Term (commonly referred to as the “bonus value” of the Agreement). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant shall have the right to make a separate claim in the Condemnation proceeding, as long as the Award payable to Landlord is not reduced thereby, for: (a) the taking of the unamortized or undepreciated value of any leasehold improvements owned by Tenant that Landlord has the right to remove at the end of the Term and that Tenant elects not to remove; (b) reasonable removal and relocation costs for any leasehold improvements that Tenant has the right to remove and elects to remove (if condemner approves of the removal); and (c) relocation costs under California Government Code section 7262, the claim for which Tenant may pursue by separate action independent of this Agreement.

9. Section 19.18 “Prevailing Wage” is hereby added to the Agreement as follows:

It shall be the obligation of Tenant and/or any contractor or subcontractor under Tenant to comply with and conform to all State of California labor laws, rules and regulations and the Parties agree that the Landlord shall not be liable for any violation thereof. To the extent that the construction of any tenant improvements or any other work performed pursuant to this Agreement may be considered a “public work” (construction, alteration, demolition, or repair work) under and pursuant to the California Labor Code (see California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and Title 8, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 8, Subchapter 3, commencing with Section 16000) and subject to labor compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations, Tenant (and its contractor(s) and subcontractor(s) performing the work) shall conform to any and all prevailing wage requirements applicable to the work on the Premises under this Agreement.

Tenant (and its contractors and subcontractors) shall adhere to the prevailing wage determinations made by the Director of Industrial Relations pursuant to California Labor Code Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2, applicable to any tenant improvements or work performed pursuant to this Agreement.

All workers employed in the execution of a public works contract (as such term is defined California Labor Code Section 1720 et seq. and Section 1782(d)(1)) must be paid not less than the specified prevailing wage rates for the type of work performed. (Reference: California Labor Code Sections 1720, 1774 and 1782). Tenant shall ensure that its contractors and subcontractors also comply with and adhere to this prevailing wage provision. Tenant shall be responsible for any failure of Tenant’s contractors and/or subcontractors to comply with applicable prevailing wage and public works laws. If the Tenant is unsure whether the subject work is a “public work” as defined in the California Labor Code, it may wish to seek a timely determination from the California Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) or an appropriate court. Only the DIR and courts of competent jurisdiction have jurisdiction to issue legally binding determinations that a particular project is or is not a public work.

To the extent applicable to this Agreement, Tenant agrees to be bound by the state prevailing wage requirements, including, but not limited to, the following:
a. If a worker is paid less than the applicable prevailing wage rate owed for a calendar day (or any portion thereof), Tenant shall pay the worker the difference between the prevailing wage rate and the amount actually paid for each calendar day (or portion thereof) for which the worker(s) was paid less than the prevailing wage rate, as specified in California Labor Code section 1775; b. Tenant shall maintain and make available payroll and worker records in accordance with California Labor Code sections 1776 and 1812;
c. If Tenant employs (and/or is legally required to employ) apprentices in performing any work and/or services on the Premises under this Agreement, Tenant shall ensure compliance with California Labor Code section 1777.5;

8.11 10
d. Tenant is aware of the limitations imposed on overtime work by California Labor Code sections 1810 et seq. and shall be responsible for any penalties levied in accordance with California Labor Code section 1813 for failing to pay required overtime wages; e. Tenant shall post a copy of the applicable wage rates at each jobsite at a location readily available to its workers.
f. Any failure of Tenant and/or its subconsultant to comply with the above requirements relating to a public work project shall constitute a breach of this Agreement that excuses the Landlord’s performance of this Agreement at the Landlord’s sole and absolute option and shall be at the sole risk of Tenant. Tenant on behalf of itself and any subconsultant, agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Landlord and its officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, costs, expenses, attorney’s fees, damages, expenses, fines, financial consequences, interest, and penalties, of any kind or nature, arising from or relating to any failure (or alleged failure) of Tenant and any subconsultant to pay prevailing wages or to otherwise comply with the requirements of prevailing wage law relating to a public work. g. Tenant acknowledges that it and/or any subconsultant may not engage in the performance of any contract for public work unless currently registered with the DIR and qualified to perform public work pursuant to California Labor Code section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under California Labor Code section 1771.1(a)].

10. If more than one individual or entity comprises Tenant, the obligations and liabilities imposed on each individual or entity that comprises Tenant under this Agreement will be joint and several.

11. Except as amended by this Third Amendment, all other applicable terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The terms of this Third Amendment shall control if any conflict exists.

12. Each Party acknowledges that it has reviewed this Third Amendment and that the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Third Amendment.

13. The unenforceability, invalidity or illegality of any provision(s) of this Third Amendment shall not render the other provisions unenforceable, invalid or illegal.

14. The Parties agree to execute and record a short form Memorandum of the Lease in the form attached hereto as Attachment 1.

15. The Parties may execute this Third Amendment in two or more counterparts, which shall, in the aggregate, be deemed an original but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. A scanned, electronic, facsimile or other copy of a Party’s signature shall be accepted and valid as an original.

16. The signatories to this Third Amendment warrant and represent that each is authorized to execute this Third Amendment and that their respective signatures serve to legally obligate their respective representatives, agents, successors and assigns to comply with the provisions of this Third Amendment.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

8.12 11
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Third Amendment to the Agreement as of the Effective Date.

Dated: _________________________
Dated: _________________________
Dated: _________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
Office of the City Attorney
TENANT: Marshall Miller and Kathryn Miller
______________________________________
By: Marshall Miller
______________________________________
By: Kathryn Miller
LANDLORD: City Of Santa Cruz
______________________________________
By: Matt Huffaker, City Manager

8.13 12
ATTACHMENT 1

MEMORANDUM OF LEASE

8.14 MEMORANDUM OF LEASE

RECORDING REQUESTED BY )
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: )
)
City of Santa Cruz )
337 Locust Street )
Santa Cruz, CA 95060 )
Attn: Director of Economic Development )
)
Exempt from Recording Fees Pursuant to Government Code Section 27383

MEMORANDUM OF LEASE
This Memorandum of Lease (“Memorandum”) is hereby entered into as of ____________, 2026, by and between the City of Santa Cruz, a California municipal corporation and charter city, (“Landlord”), and Marshall Miller and Kathryn Miller (“Tenant”)(collectively the “Parties”).

RECITALS
A. Landlord and Tenant have entered into that certain Lease (the “Lease”) dated February 1, 2011, for the building designated as 17-D Municipal Wharf, Santa Cruz, California (the “Premises”). A copy of the Lease is available for public inspection upon request at Landlord's office at 337 Locust Street, Santa Cruz, California. The Lease is for a term of ten (10) years terminating on January 31, 2021, with the option to extend the term for two (2) additional five (5) year periods.

B. On March 21, 2021, the Parties entered into a First Amendment.

C. On October 15, 2024, the Parties entered into a Second Amendment to extend the term of the Lease to February 1, 2026.

D. On ________, 2026, the Parties entered into a Third Amendment to extend the term of the Lease to January 31, 2031.

E. Pursuant to Government Code section 37393, this Memorandum shall be executed and recorded in the Official Records of Santa Cruz County, California.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto certify as follows:

Landlord, pursuant to the Lease, hereby leases the Premises to the Tenant upon the terms and conditions provided for therein. The Lease imposes certain obligations, requirements on the Tenant, and limitations on the use of the Premises. This Memorandum is not a complete summary of the Lease and shall not be used to interpret the provisions of the Lease. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

8.15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Memorandum to be executed by their lawfully authorized representatives.

LANDLORD:

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, a California municipal corporation and charter city By:____________________________________ Date:___________ Matt Huffaker
City Manager
TENANT:

By: ________ Date:__________
Marshall Miller

By:________________________ Date:__________
Kathryn Miller
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: ___________________
Office of the City Attorney

8.16 CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NOTARY PUBLIC
State of California)
County of Santa Cruz)
On ______________________ before me, , Notary
Public, personally appeared __________________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

(This area for official notary seal)
Signature ______________________________
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

8.17 CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NOTARY PUBLIC
State of California)
County of Santa Cruz)
On ______________________ before me, , Notary
Public, personally appeared __________________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

(This area for official notary seal)
Signature ______________________________
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

8.18 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/09/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: Information Technology
SUBJECT: Application and Project Management Support for Information Technology Systems (IT)
LOCATION: Citywide
RECOMMENDATION: Motion authorizing the Information Technology Director to approve a contract change order or amendment, in a form to be approved by the City Attorney, increasing the expenditure limits set by Council at the September 30, 2025 City Council meeting with respect to the Vantagepoint Business Solutions, LLC (Vantagepoint) Professional Services Agreement, for application and project management support of critical information technology systems. The total contract value, inclusive of this amendment, shall not exceed $1,133,300.

BACKGROUND: The Information Technology (IT) Department is actively managing various application-related projects, strategically emphasizing the streamlining of the City’s technology landscape and the reduction of dependence on legacy applications. To address this, the department collaborates with professional services partners and leverages advanced knowledge of the City's unique application landscape.

These collaborations have proven particularly advantageous, enhancing the department's ability to provide targeted and effective support as needed. This support includes project management and assistance for applications serving key City systems such as:
 Utility billing system
 Financial management system
 Human resources management system
 Permitting and licensing system
 Asset management system
 Document management system
 Time management system
This strategic approach plays a crucial role in maintaining the operational sustainability of the City's technology systems, minimizing downtime, disruption, and risk.

DISCUSSION: Recognizing the ongoing need for additional operational and project management support through professional services, the IT Department sought to secure the most

9.1 qualified vendor. To ensure a thorough selection process, the staff initiated a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP). The objective of this evaluation was twofold: to identify a vendor capable of meeting the City’s specific requirements and to offer a competitive cost proposition.

Following a comprehensive evaluation, VantagePoint Business Solutions, LLC emerged as the most qualified vendor. Their selection was based on a combination of demonstrated expertise in addressing the City's unique requirements and providing a cost-effective solution. The competitive RFP was instrumental in thoroughly evaluating potential partners, emphasizing the importance of delivering exceptional value.

Vantagepoint resources are being leveraged for Citywide implementations of new Workday Enterprise Resource Planning, Teller Cashiering, and SpryPoint Utility Billing software. These large and complex implementations have been re-planned to extend timeline, increasing the resource hours needed for consistent coverage throughout the lifetime of the projects.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: This is not a project under CEQA.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): The City’s engagement with VantagePoint Business Solutions, LLC advances Health in All Policies (HiAP) by modernizing the software solutions residents and employees rely on daily. These improvements increase efficiency, expand digital access, and make essential services easier to use online-strengthening both equity and community well-being. The project also supports the 2022 Climate Action Plan by:
• Updating software to deliver modern, reliable online services. • Reducing trips by residents and City vehicles through expanded digital options. • Supporting technology solutions for hybrid work options.

By streamlining systems such as permitting, licensing, utility services, and payments, the City ensures that residents can more easily access services while reducing environmental impacts and promoting digital inclusion.

FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: No

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: There is no impact to the General Fund, and no budget adjustments are required. This amendment reflects an increase above the previously authorized contract amount.

The agreement with Vantagepoint spans three years, with an option to renew for an additional two years under identical terms and conditions. The total cost for application and project management support services during FY2026, FY2027, and FY2028.

9.2 Costs will be allocated across the following accounts:
• Information Technology Department - Professional and Technical Services (1251-52199) • Capital Improvement Plan Project Fund (C152002)
• Capital Improvement Plan Project Fund (C152301) - established for the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Replacement Project, which commenced in FY2025 The total contract value, inclusive of this amendment, shall not exceed $1,133,300.

Fiscal
Year
Resource Hourly
Rate
Total Amount (Not to Exceed)
FY26 Senior Solutions Architect $200
Solution Consultant $185
$308,500
FY27 Senior Solutions Architect $200
Solution Consultant $185
$577,400
FY28 Senior Solutions Architect $200
Solution Consultant $185
$307,400
Prepared By:

El Johnson
Program Analyst II
Submitted By:

Ken Morgan
IT Director
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - VANTAGEPOINT.PDF

2. CHANGE ORDER – VANTAGEPOINT.PDF

9.3 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support
October 2025 Page 1
Professional Services Agreement With

VANTAGEPOINT BUSINESS SOUTIONS, LLC
For APPLICATION AND PROJECT SUPPORT
THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) for professional services is made by and between the City of Santa Cruz (“City”) and VANTAGEPOINT BUSINESS SOUTIONS, LLC (“Consultant”) (each is referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively, as the “Parties”) as of October 1st, 2025 (the “Effective Date”).

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of each other’s mutual promises, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

SECTION 1: SCOPE OF WORK
Consultant will furnish services as defined and described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein.

SECTION 2: RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONSULTANT
All services performed by Consultant, or under Consultant’s direction, shall be rendered in accordance with the generally accepted practices, and to the standards of, Consultant's profession. Consultant represents and agrees that Consultant: (i) is fully experienced and properly qualified to perform the work and services provided for herein, (ii) has the financial capability required for the performance of the work and services, and (iii) is properly equipped and organized to perform the work and services in a competent, timely, and workmanlike/professional manner, in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement. All services performed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall conform to the specifications of the applicable Scope of Work for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of final acceptance by the City.

Consultant shall not undertake any work beyond the Scope of Work set forth in Exhibit A unless such additional work is approved in advance and in writing by City. City shall compensate Consultant for such additional work on the same basis as provided for in Section 4.

If, in performing the services, it is necessary to conduct field operations, security and safety of the job site will be the Consultant's responsibility excluding, the security and safety of any facility of City within the job site which is not under the Consultant’s control or authority.

Consultant shall meet with Michael Schmidt, IT Assistant Director of the City’s Information Technology Department, hereinafter called " IT Assistant Director", or other designated and authorized City personnel, and/ or third parties as necessary, on all matters connected with carrying out Consultant’s services described in Exhibit A.

Such meetings shall be held at the request of either Party. Consultant shall obtain City’s review and acceptance of completed work monthly, or at other intervals as may be mutually agreed upon during the term of this Agreement.

Review or acceptance of Consultant’s work by City or its designee shall not relieve Consultant from responsibility for errors and omissions in Consultant’s work.

SECTION 3: RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY
City shall make available to Consultant all data and information in the City’s possession necessary to carrying out and completing the services and shall actively assist Consultant in obtaining such information from other agencies and individuals as needed. Consultant is entitled to reasonably rely upon the accuracy and completeness of such data and information, and Consultant shall provide City prompt written notice of any known defects in such data and information.














 


9.4 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support
October 2025 Page 2
The IT Assistant Director may authorize a City staff person to serve as their representative with respect to this Agreement. Consultant’s work shall be reviewed at such intervals as may be mutually agreed upon between the Parties. The City will be the sole judge of acceptable work, provided that such approval will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. If the work is not acceptable, City will inform Consultant of the changes or revisions necessary to secure acceptance.

SECTION 4: FEES AND PAYMENT
For services actually performed, the City will compensate Consultant at the rates set forth in the Fee Schedule detailed in Exhibit B and in accordance with the terms set forth therein. Payment for Consultant's services in carrying out the entire Scope of Work shall be made within the budget limit, or limits shown, upon Exhibit B.

Consultant agrees that the payments to Consultant specified in this Section 4 will constitute full and complete compensation for all obligations assumed by Consultant under this Agreement. Such payments shall be considered the full compensation for all personnel, materials, supplies, and equipment used by Consultant in the Scope of Work. Where conflicts regarding compensation may occur, the provisions of this section shall apply.

Variations from the budget for each task which are justified by statements indicating personnel time expended and submittal of a revised budget are only allowed with prior written City approval; however, in no event shall the total fee charged for the Scope of Work set forth in Exhibit A exceed the Total Not to Exceed Amounts provided in the Exhibit B Fee Schedule without advance written City authorization in the form of an amendment or change order.

Invoices shall detail the time worked by each class of employee on each task and the expenses incurred for which billing is made. Unless otherwise specified in the fee schedule, payments shall be made monthly by the City within 30 days based on itemized invoices from the Consultant which list the actual costs and expenses.

All invoices shall contain the following affidavit signed by Consultant (if individual) or by an authorized representative of Consultant (if Consultant is an entity):
“[I] or [As an authorized representative of Consultant, I] hereby certify that the charge of (Insert invoice amount) as summarized above and shown in detail on the attachments is in accordance with the terms of the Agreement by and between the City of Santa Cruz and (Insert Party Name) dated (Insert Agreement Date), and has not been previously paid." This Agreement is contingent upon the appropriation of sufficient funding by the City for the Scope of Work covered by this Agreement. If funding is reduced or deleted for the Scope of Work covered by this Agreement, the City has the option without penalty or liability to either terminate this Agreement or to offer an amendment to this Agreement indicating any reduced amount.

SECTION 5: TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT POLICY
The City agrees to reimburse Consultant and Consultant’s employee(s) for only authorized travel expenses, as indicated by a mark below, and according to the City’s Travel Reimbursement Policy. It is expected that all travel expenses incurred by Consultant while conducting activities on behalf of the City will be at reasonable rates and that Consultant and Consultant’s employee(s) will exercise prudence in incurring these expenses. ܈ Meals: Meals are reimbursed at the current GSA Meals & Incidental per diem rate by county (www.gsa.gov/travel). The City does not reimburse for actual costs for meals. Reimbursement is based solely on per diem rates. Do not submit meal receipts.
x Travel before 8:00am qualifies for breakfast reimbursement. x Travel between 8:00am – 1:30pm qualifies for lunch reimbursement. x Travel between 1:30pm – 7:00pm (or later) qualifies for dinner reimbursement. 













 


9.5 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support
October 2025 Page 3
x Days between hotel stays and days starting before 8am and ending after 7pm, qualify for the full GSA Meals & Incidental per diem rate.
܈ Ground Transportation: Ground transportation is reimbursable when it is for travel between the Consultant’s place of business, an airport, or Santa Cruz hotel, as applicable, to the City work location.

1. Reasonable fees for taxis, shuttles, buses, trains, light rail, ride hailing services (Uber, Lyft or other), and similar modes of transportation will be reimbursed. Receipts are required for reimbursement.

2. When using vehicles owned by Consultant or Consultant’s employer:
x Mileage will be reimbursed at the current IRS mileage rate. x Evidence of automobile liability insurance meeting the City’s requirements must be provided. x Maps showing starting point, City work location, and total miles are required for reimbursement.

3. Use of car rentals are reimbursable when:
x Travel is necessary from an airport to the City work location. x The rental reservation is made as far in advance as is practical and the lowest possible price is obtained. x Insurance coverage is included, and the car is returned with a full tank of gas. x The smallest vehicle necessary is rented.
x Parking expenses are included in the GSA Meals & Incidental per diem rate. The City will not pay additionally for parking expenses.
x Receipts are required for reimbursement.
܈ Airfare: Airfare is reimbursable when the Consultant’s place of business, or Consultant’s employee’s home, is more than 250 miles away from Santa Cruz.
x Airfare must be lowest available coach class fare. Flights may be non-stop. x Airfare must be booked as far in advance as is practical. x Fees for one piece of checked luggage (and any equipment necessary for the work being done) will be reimbursed.
x Extra charges for seat assignments, refundable tickets, travel insurance/protection, and similar fees are not reimbursable.
x If the City cancels the need for travel and the ticket cannot be changed or refunded, the ticket cost will be reimbursable.
x Receipts are required for reimbursement.
܈ Lodging: Lodging is reimbursable when the Consultant must work on site for two or more consecutive days and the Consultant’s place of business or personal residence, is more than 60 miles away from Santa Cruz. x Lodging is reimbursed up to the current GSA rate by county (www.gsa.gov/travel). x Costs for hotel rooms above this rate are the responsibility of the traveler. x Receipts are required for reimbursement.

General Rule

1. Travel expenses not listed or checked above will not be reimbursed.

2. Travel reimbursements are paid after the completion of travel. There are no travel advances.

3. Exceptions to any of the above requirements require advance written permission from the IT Assistant Director or City’s designated agent contracting with the Consultant.

4. Tips and gratuities will not be reimbursed.

5. Alcoholic beverage purchases will not be reimbursed.

6. Consultants will exercise prudence in incurring reimbursable expenses.

7. The City of Santa Cruz has the sole discretion to deny any reimbursement request the City has determined to be excessive or an inappropriate use of public funds.














 


9.6 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support
October 2025 Page 4
SECTION 6: CHANGES IN WORK
City may negotiate changes to the Scope of Work. No changes to the Scope of Work shall be made without the prior written agreement between City and Consultant. Any change requiring compensation in excess of the sum specified in Exhibit B shall be approved in advance in writing by the City. Only City’s authorized representative(s) is authorized to approve changes to this Agreement on behalf of City.

SECTION 7: TERM AND SCHEDULE
The term of this Agreement shall be for three years and commence on the Effective Date of this Agreement and terminate on October 1st, 2028. At the option of the City, this Agreement may be renewed for up to two (2) additional years under the same contractual terms and conditions by letter agreement.

Consultant shall begin the Scope of Work as specified in a written authorization (e.g., Notice to Proceed) to perform services issued by the City. The written authorization to perform work shall not be issued until after this Agreement has been approved and executed by the City.

Neither party shall be held responsible for delay or default caused by declared emergencies, natural disasters, or any Force Majeure event which is beyond the party's reasonable control. Consultant will, however, make all reasonable efforts to remove or eliminate such a cause of delay or default and will, upon the cessation of the cause, diligently pursue performance of its obligations under this Agreement.

The City reserves the right to obtain the item(s) and/or services covered by this Agreement from another source during any on-going suspension of service due to the circumstances outlined above.

SECTION 8: TERMINATION
The City may terminate the Agreement for any reason by providing written notice to Consultant not less than 10 business days prior to an effective termination date.

The City may, at its option, allow Consultant to cure its failure to perform within 10 business days (or longer period authorized in writing by the City) from the date of the City’s termination notice. The termination shall be become effective if Consultant has not cured within the specified time period to the City’s satisfaction.

Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause if the City fails to cure a material default in performance of its obligations under this Agreement within a period of 30 calendar days (or such longer period agreed to by the Consultant), from the date of the Consultant’s written termination notice specifying the default in performance.

Consultant must provide a written notice of termination to the City not less than 60 calendar days of the effective termination date.

Upon notice of termination by either the City or Consultant, the Consultant will immediately act to not incur any additional obligations, costs or expenses, except as may be reasonably necessary to terminate its activities. The City’s only obligation to the Consultant will be just and equitable payment for services authorized by, and received to the satisfaction of, the City up to and including the effective date of termination less any amounts withheld. All finished or unfinished work or documents procured or produced under the Agreement will become property of the City upon the termination date. In the event of Consultant’s failure to perform pursuant to the Agreement, the City reserves the right to obtain services elsewhere and Consultant will be liable for the difference between the prices set forth in the terminated Agreement and the actual cost to the City. If the City decides to obtain services elsewhere, the City shall provide Consultant with a written estimate of the increased costs the City reasonably expects to incur as a result. Upon receiving such estimate from the City, the Consultant shall have ten (10) business days to provide a written response. A senior executive from each Party shall consult and negotiate to reach a solution. If an amicable 













 


9.7 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support
October 2025 Page 5
solution cannot be reached between the Parties within fifteen (15) days from Consultant’s response to the City, it will be referred to Dispute Resolution pursuant to Section 14, subsection 18 of this Agreement. Termination of the Agreement pursuant to this paragraph shall not relieve the Consultant of any liability to City for additional costs, expenses, or damages sustained by City due to failure of the Consultant to perform pursuant to the Agreement. City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due City from Consultant is determined. After the effective date of termination, Consultant will have no further claims against the City under the Agreement. No other compensation will be payable for anticipated profit on unperformed services.

SECTION 9: INSURANCE
Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of the Agreement, Consultant will maintain and comply with the Insurance Requirements as set forth in Exhibit C. Consultant will insure the City against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder. The insurance coverages required shall not in any way limit the liability of the Consultant.

SECTION 10: INDEMNIFICATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Consultant agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers (collectively, “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all liability, claim, action, loss, injury, damage, judgment, or expense, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs (“Losses”), arising out of or resulting from any claim, demand, or action made or brought by any third party to the extent caused by or resulting from the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, Consultant’s officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors in any way related to this Agreement. Consultant’s duty to indemnify and hold harmless Indemnitees shall not apply to the extent such Losses are caused by the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of Indemnitees. Consultant’s obligation to defend shall arise regardless of any claim or assertion that Indemnitees caused or contributed to the Losses.

In the event this Agreement involves the performance of design professional services by Consultant, Consultant’s officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors, Consultant’s costs to defend Indemnitees shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault per Civil Code §2782.8. This section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.
, IN NO EVENT OR CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL CONSULTANT’S TOTAL AGGREGATE LIABILITY TO

THE CITY, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT FOR ANY CAUSE OR

CLAIM WHATSOEVER, AND REGARDLESS OF THE FORM OF ACTION, WHETHER IN CONTRACT,

TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE AND STRICT LIABILITY), OR OTHERWISE, EXCEED TWO TIMES

THE CUMULATIVE AMOUNT PAID TO CONSULTANT BY THE CITY UNDER THAT SCOPE OF WORK WHICH GAVE RISE TO, OR UNDER WHICH THE CLAIM HAS ARISEN. THE FOREGOING CAP IS AN

AGGREGATE FOR ALL CLAIMS AND SHALL NOT BE INCREASED BY MULTIPLE CLAIMS SUBJECT TO THE SAME, OVERLAPPING, OR ENTIRELY SEPARATE LOOKBACK PERIODS. THIS LIMITATION ON LIABILTY SHALL NOT APPLY TO CONSULTANT’S INDEMNITY OBLIGATIONS HEREUNDER, OR CONSULTANT’S FRAUD, WILLFUL MISCONDUCT, OR VIOLATION OF LAW (WHETHER NEGLIGENT OR WILLFUL). EXCEPT FOR CONSULTANT’S INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS HEREIN, AND EXCEPT FOR LIABILITY CAUSED BY A PARTY’S FRAUD, WILLFUL MISCONDUCT, OR VIOLATION

OF LAW (WHETHER NEGLIGENT OR WILLFUL), IN NO EVENT OR CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL EITHER

PARTY BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOST PROFITS, LOST REVENUES, LOST DATA OR INDIRECT,

INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHETHER IN AN

ACTION, IN CONTRACT OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE AND STRICT LIABILITY), EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.














 


9.8 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support
October 2025 Page 6
SECTION 11: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY/NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICIES City’s policies promote a working environment free from abusive conduct, discrimination, harassment, and retaliation; and require equal opportunity in employment for all regardless of race, religious creed (including religious dress and grooming practices), color, national origin (including language use restrictions), ancestry, religion, disability (mental and physical), medical condition, sex, gender (including gender identity and gender expression), physical characteristics, marital status, age, sexual orientation, genetic information (including family health history and genetic test results), organizational affiliation, and military or veteran status, or any other consideration made unlawful by local, State or Federal law. City requires Consultant to comply with all applicable Federal and State and local equal employment opportunity laws and regulations, and Consultant is responsible for ensuring that effective policies and procedures concerning the prevention of abusive conduct, discrimination, harassment, and retaliation exist in Consultant’s business organization. The City’s current Equal Employment Opportunity and Non-Discrimination policies to which this Section applies may be viewed at http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/SantaCruz/?SantaCruz09/SantaCruz0983.html and http://www.cityofsantacruz.com/home/showdocument?id=59192.

SECTION 12: LEGAL ACTION/ATTORNEYS’ FEES
If any action at law or in equity is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to any other relief. The laws of the State of California, with jurisdiction in the Santa Cruz County Superior Court, shall govern all matters relating to the validity, interpretation, and effect of this Agreement and any authorized or alleged changes, the performance of any of its terms, as well as the rights and obligations of Consultant and the City.

SECTION 13: AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may not be amended in any respect except by way of a written instrument which expressly references and identifies this particular Agreement, which expressly states that its purpose is to amend this particular Agreement, and which is duly executed by the City and Consultant. Consultant acknowledges that no such amendment shall be effective until approved and authorized by the City’s authorized representative. No representative of the City is authorized to obligate the City to pay the cost or value of services beyond the scope of services set forth in Exhibit A.

Such authority is retained solely by the City Manager, IT Assistant Director, or their designee. Unless expressly authorized by the City Manager or IT Assistant Director, Consultant’s compensation shall be limited to that set forth in Exhibit B, Fee Schedule.

SECTION 14: MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

1. Project Manager/Key Staff. The IT Assistant Director reserves the right to evaluate and confer with Consultant regarding the project manager or other key staff assigned by Consultant to perform the work under this Agreement.

Consultant shall replace the project manager or key staff upon the IT Assistant Director’s request due to the IT Assistant Director’s concern about their performance. Otherwise, no change in assignment by the Consultant may occur without prior written approval of the City.

2. Consultant Services Only. Consultant is employed to render professional services only and any payments made to Consultant are compensation solely for such professional services.

3. Independent Contractor. In the performance of this Agreement, it is expressly understood that Consultant, including each of Consultant’s employees, agents, subcontractors or others under Consultant’s supervision or control, is an independent contractor solely responsible for its own acts and omissions, and shall not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, and agents against any claim or liability, including attorneys’ fees and costs, arising in any manner related to this Agreement that an employee, agent or others under Consultant’s supervision or control was misclassified.














 


9.9 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support
October 2025 Page 7
In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.

4. Consultant Not an Agent. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.

5. Subcontractors. Consultant shall obtain prior approval of the City prior to subcontracting of any work pursuant to this Agreement. If at any time, the City determines any subcontractor is incompetent or unqualified, Consultant will be notified and will be expected to immediately cancel the subcontract. Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all of the requirements stated herein, including naming the City of Santa Cruz, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds. Any modification to the insurance requirements for subcontractors must be agreed to by the City in writing.

Consultant shall be as fully responsible to the City for the negligent acts and omissions of its contractors and subcontractors or subconsultants, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, or acting on Consultant’s behalf pursuant to this Agreement, as it is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant. Consultant’s obligation to pay its subconsultants is an independent obligation from the City’s obligation to make payments to the Consultant.

6. Assignment. This Agreement shall not be assigned without first obtaining the express written consent of the IT Assistant Director or after approval of the City Council. Neither party may assign this Agreement unless this Agreement is amended in accordance with its terms.

7. Conflicts of Interest. Consultant agrees to comply with conflict of interest laws in performing the work and services under this Agreement. Consultant covenants (on behalf of Consultant and Consultant’s employees, agents, representatives, and subcontractors) that there is no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services required under this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges and agrees to comply with applicable provisions of conflict of interest law and regulations, including the CA Political Reform Act, (Gov’t. Code §§1090, 87100), Levine Act (Gov’t. Code §84308), and the City’s conflict of interest code. Consultant will immediately advise City if Consultant learns of a conflicting financial interest of Consultant during the term of this Agreement.

8. City Property. The work, or any portion, of Consultant in performing this Agreement shall become the property of City. The Consultant may be permitted to retain copies of such work for information and reference in connection only with the provision of services for the City. All materials and work product, whether finished or unfinished, shall be delivered to City upon completion of contract services or termination of this Agreement for any reason.

Consultant acknowledges and agrees that the work product shall be considered a work made for hire within the meaning of the patent and copyright laws of the United States; and Consultant agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of project-related documents and materials pursuant to this Agreement shall be vested in the City and Consultant waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or other intellectual property rights in favor of City. Any work product related to this Agreement shall be confidential, not to be used by the Consultant on other projects or disclosed to any third party, except by agreement in writing by the City, or except as otherwise provided herein.

Consultant’s final deliverables shall comply with Section 508 (29 U.S.C. Section 794d) accessibility requirements, as applicable. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, Consultant shall retain the 













 


9.10 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support October 2025 Page 8
rights in any pre-existing standard drawing details, designs, specifications, databases, computer software, proprietary information, documents, templates, and any other property owned by Consultant on the date of this Agreement or developed outside of this Agreement.

9. Intellectual Property and Indemnity.
a. Consultant represents to City that, to the best of Consultant’s knowledge, any Intellectual Property (including but not limited to: patent, patent application, trade secret, copyright and any applications or right to apply for registration, computer software programs or applications, tangible or intangible proprietary information, or any other intellectual property right) in connection with any services and/or products related to this Agreement does not violate or infringe upon any Intellectual Property rights of any other person or entity. b. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, its officials, officers, employees, and agents, from any and all claims, demands, actions, liabilities, damages, or expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs) arising out of a claim of infringement, actual or alleged, direct or contributory, of any Intellectual Property rights in any way related to Consultant’s performance under this Agreement or to the City’s authorized intended or actual use of Consultant’s product or service under this Agreement. This provision shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement. c. If any product or service becomes, or in the Consultant’s opinion is likely to become, the subject of a claim of infringement, the Consultant shall, at its sole expense: (i) provide the City the right to continue using the product or service; or (ii) replace or modify the product or service so that it becomes non-infringing; or (iii) if none of the foregoing alternatives are possible even after Consultant’s commercially reasonable efforts, in addition to other available legal remedies, City will have the right to return the product or service and receive a full or partial refund of an amount equal to the value of the returned product or service, less the unpaid portion of the purchase price and any other amounts, which may be due to the Consultant. City shall have the right to retrieve its data and proprietary information at no charge prior to any return of the product or termination of service.

10. Confidentiality.
a. Consultant shall not acquire any ownership interest in data and information (“City Data”) received by Consultant from City, which shall remain the property of the City. Certain information may be considered confidential (“Confidential Information”). Confidential Information shall mean all information or proprietary materials (in every form and media) not generally known to the public and which has been or is hereafter disclosed or made available directly or indirectly to Consultant through any means of communication, either verbally or in writing even if it has not been designated in writing as “Confidential” to Consultant in connection with this Agreement. Unless otherwise required by law, Consultant shall not, without City’s written permission, use or disclose City Data and/or Confidential Information other than in the performance of the obligations under this Agreement. As between Consultant and City, all City Confidential Information shall remain the property of the City. Consultant shall not acquire ownership interest in the City’s Confidential Information. b. Consultant shall be responsible for ensuring and maintaining the security and confidentiality of City Data and Confidential Information, protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of City Data and Confidential Information, protect against unauthorized access to or use of City Data and Confidential Information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to City or any end users; and ensure the proper return and/or disposal of City Data and Confidential Information upon termination of this Agreement with notice to the City.
c. Consultant shall take appropriate action to address any incident of unauthorized access to City Data and Confidential Information, including addressing and/or remedying the issue that resulted in such unauthorized 













 


9.11 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support October 2025 Page 9
access, notifying City as soon as possible of any incident of unauthorized access to City Data and Confidential Information, or any other breach in Consultant’s security that materially affects City or end users; and be responsible for ensuring compliance by its officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors with the confidentiality provisions hereof. Should confidential and/or legally protected City Data be divulged to unauthorized third parties, Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations, including but not limited to California Civil Code sections 1798.29 and 1798.82 at Consultant’s sole expense if Consultant was the cause of the breach. Consultant shall not charge City for any expenses associated with Consultant’s compliance with these obligations.

d. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its officials, officers, employees and agents against any claim, liability, loss, injury or damage (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs) arising out of, or in connection with, the unauthorized use, access, and/or disclosure of City Data and/or Confidential Information by Consultant and/or its agents, employees or subcontractors, excepting only loss, injury or damage caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. This provision shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.

11. Consultant's Records/Audits. Consultant shall maintain accurate accounting records and other written documentation pertaining to the costs incurred relating to this Agreement for examination and audit by the City, State, or federal government, as applicable, in compliance with Gov. Code §8546.7 for a contract in excess of $10,000, or in compliance with other applicable federal laws (e.g. 48 CFR 31) or regulations for a period of three (3) years from: the date of the final City payment for Consultant's services, or from the date of final disposition of real property or equipment acquired with federal funds, or date of the termination of this Agreement, whichever is later. If Consultant engages a subcontractor to perform work related to this Agreement with a cost of $10,000 or more over a 12-month period, such subcontract shall contain these same requirements. This provision shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

12. California Public Records Act. City is a public agency subject to the disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act (“CPRA”). If Consultant’s proprietary information is contained in documents or information submitted to City, and Consultant claims that such information falls within one or more CPRA exemptions, Consultant must clearly mark such information “Confidential and Proprietary,” and identify the specific lines containing the information. In the event of a request for such information, City will make best efforts to provide notice to Consultant prior to such disclosure. If Consultant contends that any documents are exempt from the CPRA and wishes to prevent disclosure, it is required to obtain a protective order, injunctive relief, or other appropriate remedy from a court of law in Santa Cruz County before the City is required to respond to the CPRA request. If Consultant fails to obtain such remedy within the time the City is required to respond to the CPRA request, City may disclose the requested information without any liability. Consultant further agrees that it shall defend, indemnify and hold City harmless against any claim, action or litigation (including but not limited to all judgments, costs, and attorney’s fees) that may result from denial by City of a CPRA request for information arising from any representation, or any action (or inaction), by the Consultant.

13. Compliance with Laws. All activities of Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and/or agents will be carried out in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Consultant further agrees to comply with the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and other provisions of Santa Cruz Municipal Ordinance chapter 3.09, or otherwise Consultant may be subject to penalties including being declared an irresponsible contractor.

14. Licensure. Consultant agrees that Consultant, its subcontractors and/or agents (if any) has/have complied with all applicable federal, state, and local licensing requirements and agrees to provide proof of a current City of Santa Cruz Business Tax Certificate if:
x Consultant, its subcontractor(s) and agent(s) or its business is/are located in the City of Santa Cruz; 













 


9.12 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support October 2025 Page 10
x Will perform actual work in the City of Santa Cruz for 6 or more days annually; or x Will use company vehicles to deliver within the City of Santa Cruz for 6 or more days annually.

For additional information and licensing requirements, view the City’s Business Licenses and Permits webpage or call the Revenue and Taxation division at 831/420-5070.

15. Living Wage. Every contract for services to the City for $10,000 or more, is subject to City of Santa Cruz Living Wage Ordinance number 2000-25. If applicable, Consultant agrees to comply with the requirements of the Living Wage ordinance as provided in Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 5.10.

16. Prevailing Wages for Public Work. To the extent that the work or services to be performed under this Agreement may be considered a “public work” (construction, alteration, demolition, or repair work) pursuant and subject to Labor Code section 1720 et seq., Consultant (and any subconsultant performing the work or services) shall conform to any and all prevailing wage requirements applicable to such work/and or services under this Agreement. Consultant (and any subconsultant) shall adhere to the prevailing wage determinations made by the Director of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to California Labor Code Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2, applicable to the work, if any. All workers employed in the execution of a public works contract (as such term is defined California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and section 1782(d)(1)) must be paid not less than the specified prevailing wage rates for the type of work performed. (CA Labor Code sections 1720, 1774 and 1782.) To the extent applicable to the scope of work and services under this Agreement, Consultant agrees to be bound by the state prevailing wage requirements, including, but not limited to, the following:
a. If a worker is paid less than the applicable prevailing wage rate owed for a calendar day (or any portion thereof), Consultant shall pay the worker the difference between the prevailing wage rate and the amount actually paid for each calendar day (or portion thereof) for which the worker(s) was paid less than the prevailing wage rate, as specified in Labor Code section 1775; b. Consultant shall maintain and make available payroll and worker records in accordance with Labor Code sections 1776 and 1812;
c. If Consultant employs (and/or is legally required to employ) apprentices in performing the work and/or services under this Agreement, Consultant shall ensure compliance with Labor Code section 1777.5; d. Consultant is aware of the limitations imposed on overtime work by Labor Code sections 1810 et seq. and shall be responsible for any penalties levied in accordance with Labor Code section 1813 for failing to pay required overtime wages;
e. Consultant shall post a copy of the applicable wage rates at each jobsite at a location readily available to its workers.
f. Any failure of Consultant and/or its subconsultant to comply with the above requirements relating to a public work project shall constitute a breach of this Agreement that excuses the City’s performance of this Agreement at the City’s sole and absolute option and shall be at the sole risk of Consultant. Consultant on behalf of itself and any subconsultant, agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, costs, expenses, attorney’s fees, damages, expenses, fines, financial consequences, interest, and penalties, of any kind or nature, arising from or relating to any failure (or alleged failure) of the Consultant and any subconsultant to pay prevailing wages or to otherwise comply with the requirements of prevailing wage law relating to a public work.
g. Consultant acknowledges that it and/or any subconsultant may not engage in the performance of any contract for public work unless currently registered with the DIR and qualified to perform public work 













 


9.13 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support October 2025 Page 11
pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)].

17. Storm Water Requirements. To the extent applicable to the Scope of Work under this Agreement, Consultant, Consultant’s employees, subcontractors, and agents are required to abide by the applicable City of Santa Cruz Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the duration of the work. The City’s mandatory Storm Water BMPs, which are listed according to the type of work, operations, or business, are located on the City website at: https://www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-departments/public-works/stormwater/bestmanagement-practices

18. Dispute Resolution. The Parties agree to attempt in good faith to resolve through negotiation any dispute, claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement. Either party may initiate negotiations by providing written notice in letter form to the other party, setting forth the subject of the dispute and the relief requested.

Promptly upon such notification, the Parties shall meet at a mutually agreeable time and place in order to exchange relevant information and perspective, and to attempt to resolve the dispute. In the event that no resolution is achieved, and if, but only if, the parties mutually agree, then prior to pursuing formal legal action, the parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve the dispute by non-binding mediation or negotiations between representatives with decision-making power, who, to the extent possible, shall not have had substantive involvement in the matters of the dispute. To the extent that the dispute involves or relates to a public works project, the Parties agree to attempt to resolve the dispute by complying with the claims process as set forth in Public Contract Code sections 9204(e), 20104-20104.6, but without waiving the requirements of the California Tort Claims Act, Gov’t Code section 800 et seq. unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties.

19. Force Majeure. Neither party hereto shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligation hereunder to the extent that the performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed by an act of God, natural disaster, pandemic, acts of terrorism, war, a strike, lockout or other labor difficulty, or other peril, which is beyond the reasonable control of the affected party and without the negligence of the respective Parties. Each party hereto shall give notice promptly to the other of the nature and extent of any Force Majeure claimed to delay, hinder or prevent performance of the services under this Agreement. Each Party will, however, make all reasonable efforts to remove or eliminate such a cause of delay or default and will, upon the cessation of the cause, diligently pursue performance of its obligations in this Agreement. In the event either party is prevented or delayed in the performance of its respective obligation by reason of such Force Majeure, the only remedy is that there may be an equitable adjustment of the schedule based on City’s sole discretion.

20. Complete Agreement. This Agreement, along with any attachments, is the full and complete integration of the Parties’ agreement with respect to the matters addressed herein, and that this Agreement supersedes any previous written or oral agreements between the Parties with respect to the matters addressed herein. Unless otherwise stated, to the extent there is any conflict between this Agreement and any other agreement (written or oral), the terms of this Agreement shall control.

21. Severability. The unenforceability, invalidity or illegality of any provision(s) of this Agreement shall not render the other provisions unenforceable, invalid or illegal.

22. Waiver. Waiver by any party of any portion of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the same or any other portion hereof.

23. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with California law. 













 


9.14 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support October 2025 Page 12

24. Contract Interpretation. Each party acknowledges that it has reviewed this Agreement and that the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement.

25. MacBride Principles/Peace Charter. City of Santa Cruz Resolution NS-19,378 (7/24/90) encourages all companies doing business in Northern Ireland to abide by the MacBride Principles and Peace Charter.

26. Notices. If either party shall desire or is required to give notice to the other, such notice shall be given in writing, via email, and concurrently delivered by: (a) personal delivery, in which case notice is effective upon delivery; (b) overnight courier (i.e., Federal Express) with charges prepaid or charged to the sender’s account, in which case notice is effective when delivered; (c) priority U.S. Mail, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered on the second business day after the deposit thereof with the U.S. Postal Service. Notices shall be addressed to recipient as follows:

To CITY:

Information Technology
Michael Schmidt
809 Center Street, Room 8
Santa Cruz, CA, 95060
[email protected]
831-420-5003
To CONSULTANT:

VantagePoint Business Solutions, LLC
Greg Wright
16410 Waxmyrtle Road
Alpharetta, GA 30004
[email protected]
770-354-3997
The Parties must provide notice of any changes to the above information in writing at least ten (10) business days before the change is effective.

27. Counterparts. The Parties may execute this Agreement in two or more counterparts, which shall, in the aggregate, be deemed an original but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. A scanned, electronic, facsimile or other copy of a party’s signature shall be accepted and valid as an original.

28. Warranty of Authority. The signatories to this Agreement warrant and represent that each is authorized to execute this Agreement and that their respective signatures serve to legally obligate their respective representatives, agents, successors and assigns to comply with the provisions of this Agreement. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]














 


9.15 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support October 2025 Page 13
Approved As To Form:

By: _____________________________ Date: __________________ Stephanie Hall, Office of the City Attorney

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ
By: ______________________________ Date: _________________ Matt Huffaker, City Manager

CONSULTANT
By: _____________________________ Date: __________________ Printed: ___________________________ Title: __________________ By: _____________________________ Date: __________________ Printed: ___________________________ Title: __________________ ____________________
h i H ll Offi f t
9/10/25














 


Gregory Wright CEO
10/1/2025
10/1/2025

9.16 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support October 2025 Page 14
EXHIBIT A: SCOPE OF WORK
The Scope of Work entails the provision of ad hoc support services for application and project-related support to the City of Santa Cruz Information Technology Department. Assistance will be delivered on an hourly rate basis, rather than by project, covering various applications and interfaces. Interactions are scheduled during regular business hours, with the possibility of occasional off-hours support as necessary, which will be mutually agreed upon in writing by both Parties. The scope of work is not confined to the specifics outlined below, and its evolution into project-oriented tasks will be determined by the needs articulated by the City of Santa Cruz.

Services will be performed remotely, unless agreed to otherwise by both Parties. Should the Consultant be required to be onsite, the City of Santa Cruz agrees to reimburse the Consultant as per rates described in Section 5: Travel Reimbursement Policy. The City of Santa Cruz will provide the Consultant with timely remote access to the necessary systems and applications of the City.

Details for the support of various applications are outlined but not limited to the following support needs below:

Eden Enterprise Resource Planning Application Support:
x Offer ad hoc support and enhancement services as requested. x Address recurring processes for HR data from Eden to AD and AD data to Eden. x Assist with loading position data from xlsx into Eden. x Provide ad hoc support during Calendar Year-End as required. x Address ad hoc needs for UB enhancements and reports.

Tyler Cashiering Application Upgrade:
x Provide ad hoc support for the upgrade of Tyler Cashiering and respond to interface issues. x Address ad hoc interface support for Eden to Cashiering, CRW TrakIT to Eden, etc.

CRW TrakIT Land Use Management Application Support:
x Offer ad hoc support for Tech Fee and enhancements.
x Conduct ad hoc data cleansing, including extraction and evaluation of data quality for master data fixes.

Hylands – OnBase Document Management Application Support and Upgrade:
x Provide ad hoc support for the Public Request Module.

Gasboy (EKOS) Application Support:
x Offer ad hoc support and enhancements.
x Beacon and AMI Integrations:
x Provide ad hoc support and enhancements.

MyCity of Santa Cruz Application Support:
x Address ad hoc interface support and enhancements.














 


9.17 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support October 2025 Page 15
General IT Support:
x Assist City IT with ad hoc support for various applications and interfaces.

AIMS Parking Application Support and Upgrade:
x Implement AIMS upgrade as needed.
x Implement LPR solution as needed.
x Provide ad hoc support for current AIMS.
x Provide ad hoc support for upgraded AIMS and LPR.

Tyler Enterprise Permitting and Licensing (EPL)
x Data Mapping/Conversion from TrakIT to Tyler EPL
x Data Cleanup assistance
x Cashiering migration to next generation system (Can/AM Teller and Workday) Data Migration Support
x Support the efforts to move from Tyler Eden and Cashiering to Workday and Can/AM Teller Cityworks Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) Application Implementation:
x Implement Cityworks and address ad hoc needs for migrating remaining departments (Fleet and Wharf) from CMMS.















 


9.18 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support October 2025 Page 16
EXHIBIT B: FEE SCHEDULE
Fiscal
Year Resource
Hourly
Rate
Total
Hours Total Not to Exceed Amount
FY26 Senior Solutions Architect $200 1000 $205,500 Solution Consultant $185 30 FY27 Senior Solutions Architect $200 1500 $307,400 Solution Consultant $185 40 FY28 Senior Solutions Architect $200 1500 $307,400 Solution Consultant $185 40 All fees and actual business expenses incurred will be billed to the City twice a month. The City will pay thirty (30) days after receipt of a correct and undisputed invoice.














 


9.19 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support October 2025 Page 17
EXHIBIT C: INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Consultant shall procure and maintain insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property and otherwise which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work under this Agreement and the results of that work by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors.

A. CERTIFICATE REQUIREMENTS
The City will be issued a Certificate of Insurance (a Memorandum of Understanding will not be accepted) with the following minimum requirements:
x Certificate(s) will show current policy number(s) and effective dates, x Coverage and policy limits will meet, or exceed, requirements below, x The Certificate Holder will be City of Santa Cruz, Risk Management, 1200 Pacific Ave., Suite 290, Santa Cruz, CA 95060,
x Certificate will be signed by an authorized representative, x An endorsement, if required below, will be provided to show the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds, and
x Coverages must be maintained during the term of the Agreement with the City, unless a longer duration is required as specified below.

B. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMITS OF INSURANCE
Consultant acknowledges that the insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this section constitute the minimum amount of coverage required. If Consultant maintains broader insurance coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown below, the City of Santa Cruz requires and shall be entitled to the broader insurance coverage and/or higher limits maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City of Santa Cruz.

Coverage will be at least as broad as:
x COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY (CGL): $1,000,000 PER OCCURRENCE; $2,000,000 AGGREGATE Proof of coverage for $1 Million per occurrence and $2 Million in the aggregate including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury, personal and advertising injury will be provided on Insurance Services Office (ISO) Form CG 00 01 covering CGL. x PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (ERRORS AND OMISSIONS): $2,000,000 PER OCCURRENCE OR CLAIM, $2,000,000 AGGREGATE.

Consultant will maintain insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession; with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate. Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after date of completion of the services under this Agreement. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date or start of work date, Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. x AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY:

Proof of coverage for $1,000,000 provided on ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Consultant has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non-owned autos (Code 9), per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
x WORKERS’ COMPENSATION AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WITH STATUTORY LIMITS, AND EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY INSURANCE: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

The Worker’s Compensation policy must be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City for all work performed by the Consultant and its employees.














 


9.20 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support October 2025 Page 18
(Not required if Consultant provides written verification it has no employees) - If Consultant has no employees, Consultant shall complete and sign a Workers’ Compensation Exemption Declaration and Release of Liability.
x For Data Security and Privacy Liability

1. Consultant shall maintain one or more insurance policies - Privacy, Technology and Data Security Liability, Cyber Liability, or Technology Professional Liability Insurance coverage in the amount of $3,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $3,000,000 aggregate.

Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations undertaken by Consultant in this contract.

2. The policy(ies) shall include coverage for claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, business interruption, cyber extortion, social engineering, infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information.

3. The policy(ies) shall provide coverage for breach response costs as well as regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations.

4. The policy(ies) shall include, or be endorsed to include, property damage liability coverage for damage to, alteration of, loss of, or destruction of electronic data and/or information “property” of the City in the care, custody, or control of the Consultant.

C. OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS
The insurance policies are to comply with the following provisions:
x ADDITIONAL INSURED STATUS
The City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations, products and completed operations. General liability coverage will be provided in the form of an endorsement to Consultant’s insurance at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85, or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 (if a later edition is used). x PRIMARY COVERAGE
For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant’s and all subcontractor’s insurance coverage will be primary and non-contributory as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers.

Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers will be excess of Consultant’s and all subcontractor’s insurance and will not contribute with it. x NOTICE OF CANCELLATION
Each insurance policy required above shall state that the coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.
x WAIVER OF SUBROGATION
Consultant hereby grants to the City a waiver of any right to subrogation, except as otherwise not applicable, which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss, including attorney’s fees under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to effectuate this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
x EXCESS LIABILITY/UMBRELLA INSURANCE POLICIES
Consultant may use excess liability/umbrella policies to meet the required liability limits on the condition that they provide all of the insurance coverages required herein, including, but not limited to, primary and noncontributory, additional insured, Self-Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The 













 


9.21 City of Santa Cruz Application and Project Support October 2025 Page 19
excess liability/umbrella insurance policies shall be provided on a true “following form” or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying CGL insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the additional insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the Consultant’s primary and excess liability policies are exhausted.
x SELF-INSURED RETENTIONS (SIR)
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. City may require Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related expenses. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City.
x ACCEPTABILITY OF INSURERS
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A: VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
x CLAIMS MADE POLICIES
If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:

1. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.

2. Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided, for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work. x VERIFICATION OF COVERAGE
Consultant will furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy (and CPL, automobile and any Excess Liability/Umbrella policies, as applicable) listing all policy endorsements to be approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning will not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

D. SUBCONTRACTORS
Consultant shall include their subcontractor(s) as additional insured(s) under the policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each contractor and subcontractor. Consultant shall require and verify that all contractors and subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are named as additional insureds on insurance required from its contractor(s) and subcontractor(s).

E. SPECIAL RISKS/CIRCUMSTANCES
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances and provide notice to Consultant. 













 


9.22 Change Order
Change Order: CO001
Submittal Date: 4/7/2026

1. Reason for Change:

In accordance with the Scope of Work (SOW) in the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) executed 10/01/2025, Vantagepoint resources have been leveraged to assist in project- related support services and tasks. This includes providing support for the implementation of new Workday Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Tyler Enterprise Land Management (EPL), Teller Cashiering, and SpryPoint Utility Billing software.

The implementation of the Workday ERP, Teller Cashiering, and SpryPoint Utility Billing software have been re-planned to extend timeline, increasing the resource hours needed for consistent coverage throughout the lifetime of the projects.

These high-lift projects have also necessitated provisioning additional Vantagepoint resources for project and application support, leveraging Workday specific expertise in targeted areas.

Increased need for VantagePoint support hours and resources will result in surpassing the previously defined “not to exceed” amounts set in the original PSA’s Exhibit B.

2. Description of Impact:

This Change Order (Change Order 1) amends Exhibit B in the current Professional Services agreement to the below amounts, effective as of date of execution.

Fiscal
Year
Resource Hourly
Rate
Total Amount (Not to Exceed)
FY26 Senior Solutions Architect $200 $308,500
Solution Consultant $185
FY27 Senior Solutions Architect $200 $577,400
Solution Consultant $185
FY28 Senior Solutions Architect $200 $307,400
Solution Consultant $185
Signatures on the following page

9.23 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Change Order to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the date set forth below.

Change Approval

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ
By: ________________________________
Date: _________
Ken Morgan
Director of IT

VANTAGEPOINT
By: _____________________________
Date: _________
Greg Wright
CEO

9.24 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/02/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Donation from the Community Foundation of Santa Cruz County to Support the Abbott Lighthouse (PR)
LOCATION: District 3
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Accept a donor-funded light beacon from the Community Foundation of Santa Cruz County (CFSCC) for the Abbott Lighthouse;
2) Approve of the City accepting funds raised by the CFSCC to support long-term maintenance of the building;
3) Approve the maintenance of the Abbott Lighthouse as described in this agenda report; and 4) Adopt a CEQA finding of categorical exemption pursuant to 14 CCR 15301 (existing facilities) and 14 CCR 15061 (common sense exemption).

BACKGROUND: Perched above Lighthouse Point, along West Cliff Drive, the Mark Abbott Memorial Lighthouse has long served as both a navigational beacon and a symbol of Santa Cruz’s coastal identity. As a historic structure exposed to harsh marine conditions, the lighthouse requires specialized care. Replacement parts are often difficult to source and come at a significant cost. The lighthouse’s beacon light is nearing the end of its lifespan. The cost to replace the light is approximately $25,000, reflecting both the specialized equipment required and the complexity of installation.

The lighthouse is operated by the Parks and Recreation Department, and facility maintenance is provided by Public Works. In addition to serving as a lighthouse, the building is the home of the Santa Cruz Surfing Museum, which is run by the Parks and Recreation Department in partnership with the Santa Cruz Surfing Club Preservation Society.

DISCUSSION: A community-led effort is underway to support the Abbott Memorial Lighthouse. Resident and longtime lighthouse steward Bill Simpkins, in partnership with community members, has established the Keepers of the Light Fund through the Community Foundation of Santa Cruz County (CFSCC) to support ongoing maintenance and restoration of

10.1 the beacon at Abbott Memorial Lighthouse. The Santa Cruz Museum of Art and History (MAH) is also a key stakeholder in assisting the City and CFSCC with outreach and creation of a plaque to be installed on the lighthouse to recognize donors and memorialize the Keepers of the Light Fund.

The new lighthouse beacon was purchased by Mr. Simpkins with community-raised funds in coordination with CFSCC, and pending City Council approval, will be donated to the City and installed in the lighthouse. The Keepers of the Light Fund will be an ongoing fund through CFSCC for future maintenance of the Abbott Memorial Lighthouse. Funds will be accessible by the Parks and Recreation Department in coordination with Public Works to support maintenance of the building into the future.

City Council Policy 12.10 (attached) states, “Monetary donations greater than $50,000 per individual donation, and any donation for a project or program that is not part of a department’s ongoing operations, or that has not otherwise been approved by the City Council, shall be placed on a City Council agenda for review.” Because the combined value of the lighthouse beacon ($25,000) and the funds raised by the Community Foundation (at least $25,000), City staff seek approval from the City Council to accept these donations to support maintenance, upkeep, and long-term vibrancy of the Abbott Memorial Lighthouse.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: The proposed Council action is exempt from CEQA under the following:
1) Class 1 Categorical Exemption (14 CCR 15301) because the Council action consists of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing structures and facilities involving no expansion of use.
2) Common Sense exemption (14 CCR 15061) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): The funding provided through CFSCC will support important maintenance of the Abbott Memorial Lighthouse, which is one of numerous facilities operated by the Parks and Recreation Department. The Department’s mission is to provide quality public space and experiences that build a healthy community, foster equity, and better the environment. These components of the Department’s mission align with those key pillars of HiAP – health, sustainability, and equity.

FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: No

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: None.

Prepared and Submitted By:

Tony Elliot
Parks and Recreation Director
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. CITY COUNCIL POLICY 12.10.PDF

10.2 COUNCIL POLICY 12.10
POLICY TITLE: DONATIONS AND CONTRIBUTIONS
POLICY STATEMENT:

From time to time, the City receives donations and contributions to support City projects and programs. This policy establishes the procedures for accepting such donations.

I. Authority to Accept Donations.

A. For monetary donations less than $50,000 per individual donation, including cash donations from non-profit organizations established to support City projects and programs, the City Manager shall have the administrative authority to accept and appropriate such donation to be used for the donor’s intended purpose, for projects and programs previously approved by the City Council. No formal acceptance by the City Council is necessary.

B. For non-monetary donations, the Department Head shall have the administrative authority to accept such donation to be used for the donor’s intended purpose, for projects and programs previously approved by the City Council. If the value of the donation is greater than $50,000, the department shall give the Council an information report describing the donation and its use.

C. The Department Head shall have the authority to approve the use of monetary donations received and spent by non-profit organizations established to support City projects and programs previously approved by the City Council.

D. Monetary donations greater than $50,000 per individual donation, and any donation for a project or program that is not part of a department’s ongoing operations, or that has not otherwise been approved by the City Council, shall be placed on a City Council agenda for review.

II. It shall be the responsibility of the receiving department to send a thank you letter to the donor and to ensure that the donation is used only for its intended official City use.

III. Departments shall prepare an annual report with information about donations received.

More specific detail is found in Administrative Procedure Order I-76.

AUTHORIZATION: Motion December 13, 2005
Revised November 14, 2006
FN 861 POL Donations Policy 50K

10.3 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/09/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Santa Cruz Wharf Interim Repairs and Recovery (PR) LOCATION: District 4
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Authorize the Parks & Recreation Director to execute a final Change Order in the amount of $36,310.15 with Jilk Heavy Construction, Inc. for the 2025 SC Wharf End Interim Repair Project (c302612); and
2) Adopt a resolution amending the FY 2026 budget to appropriate $36,310.15 in California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) reimbursements and insurance proceeds to the 2025 SC Wharf End Interim Repair Project.

BACKGROUND: On December 23, 2024, 180 feet on the end of the Santa Cruz Municipal Wharf collapsed into the ocean following a historic wave event. The collapsed area had been damaged in the Winter 2023-24 storms and was under construction for repairs at the time of the collapse. The City responded swiftly to assess the structural integrity of the Wharf, coordinate with federal, state, and local partners, cleanup debris from the collapse, and initiate recovery planning for the future.

In February 2025, the Santa Cruz City Council (City Council) formed an ad hoc sub-committee to work with City staff on a near-term proposal to address the damaged end of the Wharf. The mission of the sub-committee was to review data and options and make recommendations to the full City Council on themes and topics related to Wharf recovery and resiliency. The subcommittee membership was composed of Vice Mayor Kalantari-Johnson, Councilmember Newsome, and Councilmember Golder. The scope of the sub-committee included making recommendations to the full City Council for near-term repairs for the damaged end of the Wharf. The sub-committee met with City staff from Parks and Recreation, Economic Development and Housing, Fire Department, Public Works, and the City Manager’s Office. The City Council ad hoc sub-committee reviewed five (5) alternatives to address the damaged end of the Wharf in the near-term that included a range of options for repair (Attachment) The subcommittee considered several factors including near-term costs and financial viability, structural integrity and resiliency, consistency with the Wharf Master Plan, and options that would allow for future visioning and potential reconstruction of the collapsed end of the Wharf.

11.1 After thorough review and discussion, the ad hoc sub-committee recommended alternative #5, which would restore the damaged end of the Wharf to Bent 171. Alternative #5 allowed for one sea lion viewing hole to be reconstructed in the near-term. This alternative also allowed for future visioning toward Wharf Master Plan implementation or opportunities to rebuild the end of the Wharf to its pre-collapse condition, if desired by the community and City Council.

On April 22, 2025 the City Council approved by motion the ad-hoc subcommittee’s recommended Alternative #5 to perform near-term Wharf restoration, directed staff to move forward with solicitation of bids to implement the construction of Alternative #5, authorized the City Manager to award the bid to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder and execute contract for Alternative 5 in a form approved by the City Attorney, and authorized the Parks and Recreation Director to execute change orders within the approved project budget.

The City subsequently awarded a contract to Jilk Heavy Construction (Jilk) of Brea, CA to construct Alternative #5. Work began on Alternative #5 in November 2025 and is expected to be completed in late April 2026.

DISCUSSION: A purchase order was issued to Jilk on October 28, 2025 in the amount of $1,357,275 plus a 10% contingency of $135,725.50 for a total contract amount of $1,493,002.51.

A series of change orders to the contract have been executed for unexpected work discovered during construction. This is not uncommon in complex construction projects, particularly those within the marine environment. A final change order is required to complete the contract, and requires increasing the contingency budget by $36,310.15, bringing the final approved project budget to $1,529,313.15.

Staff recommends a budget adjustment to increase the 2025 SC Wharf End Interim Repair Project (c302612) by $36,310.15. This appropriation will fund the final change order with the primary vendor; the required budget adjustment is attached for reference.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: The project has already been deemed exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080(b)(2); along with CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities (Class 1 Exemption); Section 15302, Replacement or Reconstruction (Class 2 Exemption); and Section 15303, New Construction or Conversion of New Structures (Class 3 Exemption). The project involves the repair, maintenance, and minor alteration of an existing facility. It consists of replacement and reconstruction of existing structures where the new ones will be located on the same site and will have the same purpose.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): The Santa Cruz Wharf is the longest timber Wharf in the western hemisphere and is a historic asset in the City of Santa Cruz. The Wharf is overseen and managed by the Parks and Recreation Department in close coordination with Public Works, Fire, and Economic Development and Housing. Together, the City not only maintains the Wharf but also activates it through numerous annual events and activities ranging from Woodies on the Wharf to the Tuesday Night Live summer concert series and much more. Beyond these events, the Wharf provides unique public access to experience the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary and is home to roughly twenty (20) local businesses. The Parks and Recreation Department’s mission is to “provide quality public spaces and experiences that build a healthy

11.2 community, foster equity, and better the environment.” Through the implementation of this mission, the Parks and Recreation Department seeks to advance the core pillars of HiAP – health, equity, and sustainability. The work of the Ad Hoc Wharf Recovery Subcommittee will ensure that the Wharf remains vibrant well into the future and able to serve the community through both the Parks and Recreation Department mission and pillars of Health in All Policies.

Restoration of damaged sections of the Wharf will help avert public health and safety risks.

FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: Yes

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: The 2025 SC Wharf End Interim Repair Project (c302612) has been budgeted as follows:

Revenues $1,493,003.00
State Office of Emergency Services $1,119,752.00
Insurance Proceeds $373,251.00
Expenditures $1,493,003.00
With the requested adjustment, the project budget would be:

Revenues $1,529,313.15
State Office of Emergency Services $1,146,984.61
Insurance Proceeds $382,328.54
Expenditures $1,529,313.15
Insurance proceeds associated with this project have been received, and an application to receive California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA) funds has been submitted to receive reimbursement for the losses incurred by the City for the Wharf damage.

Prepared By:

Norm Daly
Development Manager
Lindsay Bass
Principal Management
Analyst
Submitted By:

Tony Elliot
Parks and Recreation Director
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. BUDGET ADJUSTMENT.PDF

2. APRIL 22, 2025 AGENDA REPORT.PDF

3. SC WHARF CONCEPT END ALTS WITH ROM COSTS.PDF

11.3 City of Santa Cruz

BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
$GPLQLVWUDWLYH$SSURYDO
)LVFDO<HDU

ACCOUNT 352-(&71$0(
LIDSSOLFDEOH
255(9(18($&&28177,7/(
ACCOUNT 352-(&71$0(
LIDSSOLFDEOH
25EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT TITLE
NET: $

REQUESTED BY DEPARTMENT HEAD

APPROVAL

BUDGET/ACCOUNTING
5(9,(:('

FINANCE DIRECTOR

APPROVAL

CITYMANAGER

APPROVAL
5HVR

352-(&7
352-(&7
$02817
$02817
&RXQFLO$SSURYDO

TOTAL EXPENDITURE

TOTALREVENUE
'DWH

1VSQPTF
3FWJTFE
/PWFNCFS


 Clear Form
2026
04/07/2026 NS-30,XXX
This budget adjustment will increase the 2025 SC Wharf End Interim Repair Project (c302612) by $36,310.15. This appropriation will fund the final change order with the primary vendor; the required budget adjustment is attached for reference. 311-30-00-0000-46923 c302612-493-5025-0 2025 SC Wharf End Interim Repair Project (Insurance Proceeds) 36,310 36,310
311-30-41-9220-57303 c302612-100-2020-0 2025 SC Wharf End Interim Repair Project (Wharf Facilities) 36,310 36,310
0 Lindsay
Bass
Digitally signed
by Lindsay Bass
Date: 2026.04.13
14:43:46 -07'00'
Lindsay Bass
(For Tony
Elliot)
Digitally signed by
Lindsay Bass (For
Tony Elliot)
Date: 2026.04.13
14:44:00 -07'00'
Digitally signed
by Emily Burton
Date: 2026.04.20
'11:04:21 -07'00
Elizabet
h Cabell
Digitally signed by
Elizabeth Cabell
Date: 2026.04.20
11:05:57 -07'00' 11.4
City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/03/2025
AGENDA OF: 04/22/2025
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Santa Cruz Wharf Interim Repairs and Recovery (PR) LOCATION: District 4
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Approve Council ad-hoc subcommittee’s recommended alternative #5 to perform near-term Wharf restoration, and award a contract to Moffat and Nichol Engineering in an amount not to exceed $100,000 Moffat and Nichol to develop plans and specifications; 2) Direct staff to move forward with solicitation of bids to implement near term Wharf restoration consistent with alternative #5 which would restore the damaged end of the Wharf to bent 171;
3) If sufficient funding from CalOES continues to be confirmed, authorize the City Manager to award bid to lowest responsive and responsible bidder and execute contract for Wharf restoration construction in a form approved by the City Attorney;
4) Authorize the Parks and Recreation Director to execute change orders within the approved project budget; and
5) Approve of the CEQA determination contained in this agenda report, including the application of the following statutory and categorical exemptions: Public Resources Code Section 21080, subd. (b)(2) relating to emergency repairs to public service facilities necessary to maintain service; CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities); Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction); and Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of New Structures).

BACKGROUND: On December 23, 2024, approximately 180 ft. at the southernmost end of the Santa Cruz Municipal Wharf collapsed into the ocean following a historic wave event. The collapsed section was previously the site of the Dolphin Restaurant and one of three public restroom facilities on the Wharf, which had been damaged in the Winter 2023-24 storms and was under construction for repairs at the time of the collapse. Following the collapse, the City responded swiftly to assess the structural integrity of the Wharf, coordinated with federal, state, and local partners, cleared debris from the collapse, and initiated recovery planning for the future. Unfortunately, forced closure of the Wharf through the holidays also heavily impacted

11.5 wharf businesses and employees, as well as restricted public access for visitors. The City reopened the Wharf to the public on January 4.

In February 2025, the City Council formed an ad hoc sub-committee to work with staff on a near-term proposal to address the damaged end of the Wharf. The mission of the sub-committee is to review data and options and make recommendations to the full City Council on Wharf recovery and resiliency. The sub-committee membership includes Vice Mayor KalantariJohnson, Councilmember Newsome, and Councilmember Golder. The scope of the subcommittee includes making recommendations to the full City Council for near-term repairs for the damaged end of the Wharf. The sub-committee met twice in March 2025 with City staff from Parks and Recreation, Economic Development and Housing, Fire Department, Public Works, and the City Manager’s Office.

The Wharf is over 110 years old and requires regular maintenance and repair to ensure its safety.

This work is performed by a dedicated team of 15 full-time staff as well as multiple temporary and seasonal staff who maintain the structure and perform maintenance at Main and Cowell Beaches, including beach area public restrooms and the San Lorenzo River mouth lagoon. The Wharf is one of the longest pile-supported timber structures in the western hemisphere and, due to the on-going maintenance by Wharf staff, it continues to be in serviceable and sound condition.

Future planning for the Wharf structure is guided by the adopted Wharf Master Plan (Plan). The Plan, which was approved by City Council in January 2024, includes design concepts, structural reinforcement, public access and recreation enhancements, and enhanced opportunities for economic resilience. The Plan also considers the future effects of climate change, including stronger storms, coastal erosion, and up to 68 inches of sea level rise; to which the Plan responds with strategies for the long-term sustainability of the structure. More detailed information on the Wharf, sea level rise, and future planning considerations are outlined in Sea-Level Rise Assessment – Santa Cruz Municipal Wharf (attached). The full Wharf Master Plan and Engineering Report (bit.ly/4iU6Raz) is available on the City’s website.

In response to the immediate need for restoration of the damaged section of the Wharf, the City Council ad hoc sub-committee reviewed several alternatives and considered how each fit into implementation of the Wharf Master Plan and, specifically, how the near-term repairs may influence or restrict long-term options and opportunities for the end of the Wharf.

DISCUSSION: The ad hoc sub-committee reviewed five (5) alternatives to address the damaged end of the Wharf in the near-term (see Wharf End Repair Alternates). The sub-committee considered several factors including near-term costs and financial viability, structural integrity and resiliency, consistency with the Wharf Master Plan, and options that would allow for future visioning and potential reconstruction of the collapsed end of the Wharf.

After thorough review and discussion, the ad hoc sub-committee recommends alternative #5, which would restore the damaged end of the Wharf to bent 171 (see Wharf End Repair Alternates, p. 5) as a near-term measure needed to repair the Wharf. This alternative also allows for future visioning toward Wharf Master Plan implementation or opportunities to rebuild the end of the Wharf to its pre-collapse condition, if desired by the community and City Council.

Alternative #5 would also allow for one sea lion viewing hole to be reconstructed in the nearterm. Community outreach and decision making related to the long-term vision and strategy for

11.6 the Wharf will be discussed in more detail in the coming months with additional input from the Council ad hoc sub-committee. Ultimately, the choice of whether to or how to rebuild forward from Alternative #5 will be driven by community desire and the availability of future funding.

The estimated cost to implement Alternative #5 is approximately $870,000 plus project support costs, including permitting, plans, specifications, and engineering support, bringing the total estimated project cost to around $1,000,000. On February 14, 2025, and in accordance with the California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA), a Governor's Proclamation was issued to secure funding to help Santa Cruz County respond to and recover from the December 2024 Coastal Storm (CDAA-2025-03). Staff applied for CDAA assistance in March and are awaiting further direction and follow-up from California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES).

The primary goal of staff and the ad hoc sub-committee is to design and implement the repair project ahead of the 2025-26 winter season to avoid any further deterioration of the damaged section of the Wharf. To that end, efficiency in the City’s internal processes will be critical. The Parks and Recreation Department currently has most of the necessary building materials on hand, including decking, ledgers, stringers, and pilings, which will be used for structural repairs.

Engineering design will determine whether additional materials or timber pilings are needed, and this will influence the timing of project. City staff will also work with the California Coastal Commission to ensure that construction can take place under the City’s Wharf Maintenance Plan or emergency coastal development permit and other regulatory permits; all in a manner that balances environmental considerations with project implementation.

If Alternative #5 is approved by the City Council, the estimated timeline for completion is as follows (note: this timeline is speculative and may vary depending on a range of factors including supply chain, design and bidding process, permitting requirements, and/or weather conditions):
• Engineering plans and specs for bidding: Complete by July 1, 2025 • Bids Received: September 16, 2025 (30-day bid period). • Notice of Intent to Award Bid: September 24, 2025.
• Contract Award: October 1, 2025.
• Notice to Proceed: October 20, 2025.
• Contractor mobilization complete, ready to start construction: November 15, 2025. • Substantial Completion: March 15, 2026
In the event the City and its contractors are unable to initiate construction ahead of the 2025/26 winter season and end up in construction during less-than-favorable conditions, staff may need to delay commencing construction until spring 2026 to avoid the risks and hazards associated with winter construction. The goal is to facilitate an efficient process in 2025 to allow for construction to begin and end prior to spring of 2026.

The recommendation of the City Council ad hoc sub-committee and City staff is to approve Alternative #5. The ad hoc sub-committee will return to the City Council to provide more information and recommendations in the coming months related to broader implementation of the Wharf Master Plan, community outreach efforts for longer-term planning and implementation, and Wharf operational and policy items.

11.7 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION:

CEQA provides several statutory and “categorical exemptions” which are applicable to categories of projects and activities that the Lead Agency has determined generally do not pose a risk of significant impacts on the environment. The project consists of repairs of the damaged end of the Santa Cruz Municipal Wharf. The project is exempt from CEQA under Public Resources Code Section 21080, subd. (b)(2) relating to emergency repairs to public service facilities necessary to maintain service. CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities (Class 1 Exemption); Section 15302, Replacement or Reconstruction (Class 2 Exemption); and Section 15303, New Construction or Conversion of New Structures (Class 3 Exemption). The project involves the repair, maintenance, and minor alteration of an existing facility and consists of replacement and reconstruction of existing structures where the new ones will be located on the same site with the same purpose and no expansion of use. None of the exceptions to exemptions listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): The Santa Cruz Wharf is the longest timber Wharf in the western hemisphere and is a historic asset in the City of Santa Cruz. The Wharf is overseen and managed by the Parks and Recreation Department in close coordination with Public Works, Fire, and Economic Development and Housing. Together, the City not only maintains the Wharf but also activates it through numerous annual events and activities ranging from Woodies on the Wharf to the Tuesday Night Live summer concert series and much more. Beyond these events, the Wharf provides unique recreation opportunities and public access to experience the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary and is home to roughly 20 local businesses. The Parks and Recreation Department’s mission is to “provide quality public spaces and experiences that build a healthy community, foster equity, and better the environment.” Through the implementation of this mission, the Parks and Recreation Department seeks to advance the core pillars of HiAP – health, equity, and sustainability.

FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: No

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: The emergency project, e302501- Wharf Repair Project 2025, was created in the Disaster Cost Recovery Fund, Fund 170, and is being used to track expenses and secure disaster reimbursement.

This project has been budgeted to date as follows:

RevenuesInsurance Proceeds: $1,000,000.00
ExpendituresMiscellaneous supplies and services- $1,019,812 An application to receive California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA) funds has been submitted to receive reimbursement for the losses incurred by the City for the Wharf damage. After receiving the alternative approved by City Council, staff will return in a future meeting with a recommendation for amending the FY 2025 budget that presents and funds the remaining project costs.

11.8 Prepared and Submitted By:

Tony Elliot
Director of Parks and
Recreation
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. SEA-LEVEL RISE ASSESSMENT - SANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL WHARF.PDF

2. SANTA CRUZ WHARF CONCEPT END ALTS WITH ROM COSTS.PDF

3. WHARF RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES.PDF

11.9 2185 N. California Blvd., Suite 500
Walnut Creek, CA 94596

SANTA CRUZ WHARF - END
JOB NO. 7416/11 27 FEBRUARY 2025
20' 0' 20' 40'
1"=20'
160
165
167
170
ALT 1 - REBUILD EXISTING

REBUILD END TO ORIGINAL
APPROXIMATELY 15,200 SF
80' 190'
183
BENT NO., TYP
Alt. 1
Rough Order of Magnitude Cost
High: $11,000,000
Low: $ 8,500,000
Notes:

1. ROM costs are early estimates,
without much detail, occurring
early in the project life cycle.

Actual costs can vary +/- 50%.

2. Costs shown are based upon
the 2023 Capitola Wharf
Widening project bid results,
escalated to 2025 including
recent import tariffs.

11.10 2185 N. California Blvd., Suite 500
Walnut Creek, CA 94596

SANTA CRUZ WHARF - END
JOB NO. 7416/11 27 FEBRUARY 2025
20' 0' 20' 40'
1"=20'
160
165
167
170
ALT 2 - CUTOFF AT BENT 169

CUTOFF BEYOND
BENT 169
OPTION: REMOVE

DECKING AND LEAVE

PILES AND CAPS AS

INTERPRETIVE

ELEMENT

PEDESTRIAN AREA
END OF
WHARF
BENT NO., TYP
Alt. 2
Rough Order of Magnitude Cost
High: $310,000
Low: $240,000
Notes:

1. ROM costs are early estimates,
without much detail, occurring
early in the project life cycle.

Actual costs can vary +/- 50%.

2. Costs shown are based upon
the 2023 Capitola Wharf
Widening project bid results,
escalated to 2025 including
recent import tariffs.

11.11 2185 N. California Blvd., Suite 500
Walnut Creek, CA 94596

SANTA CRUZ WHARF - END
JOB NO. 7416/11 27 FEBRUARY 2025
20' 0' 20' 40'
1"=20'
160
165
167
170
ALT 3 - CUTOFF AT BENT 167 DEMO 60'
END OF
WHARF
BENT NO., TYP
Alt. 3
Rough Order of Magnitude Cost
High: $840,000
Low: $650,000
Notes:

1. ROM costs are early estimates,
without much detail, occurring
early in the project life cycle.

Actual costs can vary +/- 50%.

2. Costs shown are based upon
the 2023 Capitola Wharf
Widening project bid results,
escalated to 2025 including
recent import tariffs.

11.12 2185 N. California Blvd., Suite 500
Walnut Creek, CA 94596

SANTA CRUZ WHARF - END
JOB NO. 7416/11 27 FEBRUARY 2025
20' 0' 20' 40'
1"=20'
160
165
167
170
ALT 4 - TEE END
55' 80' 60' 45'

BUILD TEE END
5,200 SF
END OF
WHARF
BENT NO., TYP
Alt. 4
Rough Order of Magnitude Cost
High: $4,000,000
Low: $3,100,000
Notes:

1. ROM costs are early estimates,
without much detail, occurring
early in the project life cycle.

Actual costs can vary +/- 50%.

2. Costs shown are based upon
the 2023 Capitola Wharf
Widening project bid results,
escalated to 2025 including
recent import tariffs.

11.13 2185 N. California Blvd., Suite 500
Walnut Creek, CA 94596

SANTA CRUZ WHARF - END
JOB NO. 7416/11 27 FEBRUARY 2025
20' 0' 20' 40'
1"=20'
160
165
167
170
ALT 5 - RESTORE TO BENT 171
REBUILD END TO BENT 171
APPROXIMATELY 1,100 SF
171
END OF
WHARF
BENT NO., TYP
Alt. 5
Rough Order of Magnitude Cost
High: $870,000
Low: $670,000
Notes:

1. ROM costs are early estimates,
without much detail, occurring
early in the project life cycle.

Actual costs can vary +/- 50%.

2. Costs shown are based upon
the 2023 Capitola Wharf
Widening project bid results,
escalated to 2025 including
recent import tariffs.

11.14 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/09/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: Laurent Street Sewer Rehabilitation (Sewer System Improvements c401511) – Authorize to Advertise and Award (PW)
LOCATION: Districts 3 and 4
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Approve the plans and specifications for the Laurent Street Sewer Rehabilitation Project and authorize staff to advertise for bids and award the contract. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Public Works Director is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget; and
2) Find the Improvements Categorical Exempt under CEQA Guidelines 14 CCR section 15301(c) (existing facilities).

BACKGROUND: The City-owned sanitary sewer main on Laurent Street from Mission Street to California Street consists of 6-inch diameter vitrified clay pipes originally installed in 1926.

The sewer mains have reached near the end of their service life. A damaged section was detected in January 2026 by City Wastewater Collections crews following a storm.

DISCUSSION: This project will replace 961 linear feet of deteriorated and damaged clay sewer main with new 8-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride pipe on Laurent Street between Mission Street and California Street. Four sanitary sewer brick manholes will be removed and replaced with new concrete manholes. Cracked concrete pavement at a section of the intersection of Laurent Street and Seaside Street intersection that overlaps with the sewer main line will be replaced.

The Laurent Street Sewer Project will reduce sewage backups, improve maintenance and operations, implement permanent repairs to damaged sections of the sewer main, and will improve existing street conditions in the area.

Plans and specifications can be found on the Public Works Projects webpage:
https://www.santacruzca.gov/Government/City-Departments/Public-Works/Projects CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: This project is exempt from CEQA under Section 15301(c) Existing Facilities. Class 1 exemption

12.1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. Rehabilitation of existing sewer qualifies within this exemption.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): This project promotes the following Health in All Policies Conditions: Healthy Environments by repairing and improving sanitary sewer infrastructure to ensure raw sewage is contained within sewer pipes and to ensure capacity of pipes is sufficient to handle flows.

FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: No

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: The project is estimated to cost $730,000.00 and is funded in the FY 2026 Wastewater Capital Investment Program project c401511. There is no impact to the general fund. The project will include sewer lateral replacements for property owners interested in including their lateral replacements as part of this project effort, who will reimburse the City $4,500 per lateral for the work.

Prepared By:

Tim Wong
Assistant Engineer II
Submitted By:

Nathan Nguyen, P.E.

Director of Public Works
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

None.

12.2 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/09/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: Advance Dilemma Zone Detection and Retroreflect Project (c402216) – Notice of Completion (PW)
LOCATION: Citywide
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to accept the work of DC Electric Group, Inc. (Cotati, CA) as completed per plans and specifications and authorize the filing of the Notice of Completion for the Advance Dilemma Zone Detection and Retroreflect Project (c402216) and authorize the Public Works Director to sign the Notice of Completion as the Owner’s Authorized Agent.

BACKGROUND: At its January 14, 2025, meeting, City Council approved the authorization to advertise and award a contract for Advance Dilemma Zone Detection and Retroreflect Project.

On March 6, 2025, the project was awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, DC Electric Group, Inc. in the amount of $1,198,833.91 (including 10% contingency).

The project installed Econolite EVO radar detection systems at 26 signalized intersections along Ocean Street, Water Street, Soquel Avenue, and Laurel Street. The radar detection system tracks speed as a vehicle passes through the dilemma zone and adjusts the signal timing accordingly, which helps drivers who have difficulty deciding whether to stop or proceed during the yellow phase of a traffic signal.

The project also installed yellow retroreflective borders on traffic signal head backplates at all 41 traffic signal intersections. The retroreflective border improves the visibility of the traffic signal by providing controlled-contrast background.

DISCUSSION: The Advance Dilemma Zone Detection and Retroreflect project is now complete. Staff have inspected the work and found it to be completed in accordance with the plans and specifications. Staff recommend accepting the work of DC Electric Group, Inc. and authorizing the filing of the Notice of Completion for the project.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: The City Council found this project exempt from CEQA at the January 14, 2025 meeting. The Council applied the existing facilities Categorical Exemption in CEQA Guidelines 14 CCR section 15301(c) (Class 1 categorical exemption), which consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private

13.1 structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. Maintenance of existing streets and other alterations, such as transit improvements and pedestrian crossings that do not create additional automobile lanes, qualify within this exemption.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): Implementation of signalized intersection improvements from the HSIP10 project is in alignment with and assists in implementing the Healthy Environments component of the Health in All Policies and components of the General Plan, which include the following goals:
 M2.5.1 - Promote the use of new technologies for transportation and other community services
 M3.1.12 - Update and maintain coordinated signal timing on traffic corridors.  M3.2.2 - Ensure safe and efficient arterial operations.  M3.2.5 - Improve traffic safety at high collision locations, in residential areas, and in congested areas through speed enforcement programs, improved street design, improvements needed to reduce accidents, and by offering traffic safety educational programs in coordination with other local agencies.

The project is also aligned with and assists in implementing components of Vision Zero, which is a policy that supports the elimination of all traffic fatalities and severe injuries and supports increasing safe, healthy and equitable mobility for all.

FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: No

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: The Advance Dilemma Zone Detection and Retroreflect Project was completed with a total cost of $1,187,205.00. The project was fully funded by the HSIP Cycle 10 grant. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Prepared By:

Dan Estranero
Associate Engineer
Submitted By:

Nathan Nguyen, P.E.

Director of Public Works
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. NOTICE OF COMPLETION.DOCX

13.2 Notice of Completion (Revised Oct 2021)
(Space above for Recorder’s use only)
This instrument is being recorded for the benefit of the City of Santa Cruz.

No recording fee is required pursuant to Government Code § 27383.

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(CA Civil Code Sections 8102 and 9204)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

The undersigned is an authorized representative of the owner of the interest or estate stated below.

1. The Owner’s Name and Address. The Project owner is the City of Santa Cruz, a municipal corporation (the “City”). The City’s mailing address is 809 Center Street, Santa Cruz, California 95060. The City of Santa Cruz has the following interest in the subject Property described below: City Right-Of-Way

2. Project Title and Number. The full name of the work of improvement/public works project (the “Project”) which is the subject of this Notice of Completion is: HSIP10: Advance Dilemma Zones and Retroreflective Borders Project (c402216).

3. Nature of Work Performed on the Property or Materials Furnished for the City. The Project consisted of work described as: Installation of radar detection system at twenty-six (26) signalized intersections and retroreflective borders on traffic signal backplates at forty-one (41) signalized intersections.

4. The general site location description or address (the “Property”) of the public improvement is located at: forty-one (41) traffic signal intersections citywide

5. Name and Address of Contractor. The Contractor on the Project is: DC Electric Group, Inc. 605 W.

Sierra Ave., Cotati, CA 94931

6. Date of Completion. The Project on the Property was completed on: December 31, 2025

7. The filing of this Notice of Completion was authorized by the Santa Cruz City Council Minute Order on Tuesday, April 28, 2026
DATE: ___________________
Nathan Nguyen
Director of Public Works, City of Santa Cruz
RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF:

City of Santa Cruz, Public Works
Attn: Dan Estranero
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk’s Department
809 Center Street, Room 9
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

13.3 Notice of Completion (Revised Oct 2021)

VERIFICATION FOR THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ
I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof, and I certify that the same is true of my own knowledge, except as to those matters which are therein stated upon my information or belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on ____________________at Santa Cruz, CA
Nathan Nguyen
Director of Public Works, City of Santa Cruz

13.4 Notice of Completion (Revised Oct 2021) 13.5
City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/09/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: Fleet and Employee Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Infrastructure at City Hall Annex (c405606) - Authorization to Award Contract – Budget Adjustment (PW)
LOCATION: District 4
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Award a contract to Varni Electric (Watsonville, CA) for installation of EV chargers in the amount of $156,649, and authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Director of Public Works is authorized to execute change orders within the approved project budget;
2)Adopt a resolution to amend the FY 2026 budget and appropriate funds in the amount of $84,000 of rebate incentives from Central Coast Community Energy (3CE) for the City Hall Campus Lot 13 – EV Charging Infrastructure (c402606); and 3)Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and Section 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: In accordance with California State Law (CARB’s Advanced Clean Fleet) and the Climate Action Plan 2030 the City of Santa Cruz (City) continues to make substantial progress towards carbon neutrality. The City has made significant efforts to transition fleet vehicles from internal combustion engines (ICE) to zero-emission vehicles (ZEV). The City owns and operates a wide array of EVs, ranging from the first-generation Nissan Leaf to a 66,000 lbs. all-electric Mack garbage truck. The City also owns and operates 46 Level II EV chargers and 22 DCFC chargers.

In a continued effort to expand the EV network, staff contracted Central Pacific Engineering to design a charging system for the City Hall complex. Efforts focused on expanding charging capacity in the existing EV fleet area on Locust Street (Lot 13), as well as providing access and charging capacity for use by City staff vehicles. The proposed project has 18 Level II chargers, with a maximum output of 15 kW, which is double the speed of other comparable chargers.

There are 10 chargers for fleet, and 8 for employee parking. The chargers are located in the

14.1 secure section of the City Hall parking lot, and charging access will be managed with an existing employee badge or RFID card. These units will not be visible on public maps (like PlugShare or Google Maps), which will prevent unauthorized public parking in spaces reserved for fleet and City staff vehicles.

DISCUSSION: The project was organized into three charging subareas to allow for phased implementation based on available budget. The installation portion of the project was informally bid with three bids received. The low bid was submitted by Varni Electric ($142,408), followed by Mynt Systems ($194,800) and Triad Electric ($210,976). Based on the available budget, two subareas can be implemented at this time, totaling 18 Level II chargers.

Quotes above excluded charger equipment as staff chose to procure equipment directly to save on costs. The City received a bid from Wesco, a Sourcewell distributor, for $70,607 for 18 chargers and associated equipment. Section 3.08.170 of the Municipal Code allows the City to buy from cooperative purchasing agreements when it is in the best interest of the City to do so.

Cooperative purchasing is "Procurement conducted by, or on behalf of, one or more Public Procurement Units" as defined by the American Bar Association Model Procurement Code for State and Local Governments. Sourcewell's analysts streamline this process by developing RFPs and IFBs for national, competitive solicitations, allowing the City to "piggyback" on a pre-vetted bidding process instead of running a local RFP. By utilizing the Wesco #091422-WES the City is accessing bulk-discounted pricing on the IQ EV Charger 2 and mounting components.

The total cost to procure and install 18 EV charger ports for municipal fleet and City staff is estimated at $234,000 which includes equipment, installation, 10% contingency, permit fees, restriping, and signage. To offset costs, 3CE will provide a $5,000/port rebate, totaling $90,000 upon project completion. The increased electrical load will be tracked, with any increases noted in future budget cycles. Requests for data will be directed to the Public Works Energy Project Coordinator.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: The proposed Council action is categorically exempt from CEQA under the following categorical exemptions: Class 1 Categorical Exemption (14 CCR 15301 for Existing Facilities) and Class 4 Categorical Exemption (14 CCR 15304) for Minor Alterations to Land.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): This project directly supports the sustainability pillar of Health in All Policies and implements the Climate Action Plan (CAP) 2030 Measure T-4 to increase passenger electric vehicle (EV) adoption, Measure M-5 to electrify or otherwise decarbonize municipal fleet, and Measure M-9 in supporting climate action planning to reduce the City’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: Yes

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: The total cost of the project is estimated at $234,000.

Capital Project c402606 currently has $150,000. With approval of the attached budget adjustment to incorporate a $90,000 rebate from 3CE, there will be sufficient funds to install 18 Level II chargers at Lot 13 with no additional impact to the General Fund.

14.2 Prepared By:

Andy Shatney
Energy Projects Coordinator
Filipina Warren
Public Works Operations
Manager
Submitted By:

Nathan Nguyen, P.E.

Director of Public Works
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. BUDGET ADJUSTMENT.PDF

14.3 City of Santa Cruz

BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
$GPLQLVWUDWLYH$SSURYDO
)LVFDO<HDU

ACCOUNT 352-(&71$0(
LIDSSOLFDEOH
255(9(18($&&28177,7/(
ACCOUNT 352-(&71$0(
LIDSSOLFDEOH
25EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT TITLE
NET: $

REQUESTED BY DEPARTMENT HEAD

APPROVAL

BUDGET/ACCOUNTING
5(9,(:('

FINANCE DIRECTOR

APPROVAL

CITYMANAGER

APPROVAL
5HVR

352-(&7
352-(&7
$02817
$02817
&RXQFLO$SSURYDO

TOTAL EXPENDITURE

TOTALREVENUE
'DWH

1VSQPTF
3FWJTFE
/PWFNCFS


 Clear Form
2026
03/30/2026
Budget adjustment to appropriate $90,000 to fund the construction of electric vehicle charging infrastructure upon the City Hall campus and to accept a rebate of $90,000 from 3CE upon project completion. 311-40-00-9410-46927 c402606-703-2272-0 City Hall Campus Lot 13 EV Charging Infrastructure 90,000 Energy rebates/incentives
90,000
311-40-00-9410-57390 c402606-100-2020-0 City Hall Campus Lot 13 EV Charging Infrastructure 90,000 Other Infrastructure
90,000
0 Jenna
Wilson
Digitally signed
by Jenna Wilson
Date: 2026.03.30
11:51:24 -07'00'
Nathan N.

Nguyen
Digitally signed by
Nathan N. Nguyen
Date: 2026.04.08
18:06:10 -07'00'
Digitally signed
by Emily Burton
Date: 2026.04.15
'14:30:48 -07'00
Elizabet
h Cabell
Digitally signed by
Elizabeth Cabell
Date: 2026.04.15
17:18:04 -07'00' 14.4
City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/09/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: Water
SUBJECT: Union/Locust Backup Generator Project (c702107) – Notice of Completion (WT)
LOCATION: District 4
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to accept the work of unWired Broadband, LLC. (Fresno, CA) as complete per the plans and specifications, authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion for the Union/Locust Backup Generator Project (c702107), and authorizing the Water Director to sign the Notice of Completion as the Owner’s Authorized Agent.

BACKGROUND: The Santa Cruz Water Department (Department) and Santa Cruz Public Libraries (Library) share an office building, the Union/Locust Building, that is divided into two addresses 212 Locust Street (Water) and 117 Union Street (Library). The building was susceptible to prolonged and often unplanned power outages that disrupted regular operations of both Library and Water Department staff. In 2022, the Department investigated options for a backup power supply and after evaluating the feasibility of alternative power sources, decided that a natural gas generator would best fit the needs of both departments. Department staff procured a repurposed 100-kW natural gas generator from the City-owned Nonprofits Insurance Alliance of California (NIAC) office building at 333 Front Street that was scheduled for demolition in December 2024.

At its meeting on November 19, 2024, City Council approved the plans, specifications, and contract documents for the Union/Locust Backup Generator Project (Project) and authorized staff to advertise the Project for bids and award the contract. On February 21, 2025, the City Manager executed an agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney with unWired Broadband, LLC, for the Project. The total contract amount, including a 10% contingency, was $253,000.00. Work for the Project included:
1) Installation of a repurposed 100-kw natural gas generator with new electrical conduits and gas piping
2) Installation of a new concrete pad and pathway
3) Modifications to the existing fencing
4) Installation of a new exhaust system from the generator

15.1 DISCUSSION: All services required under the contract have been completed, inspected by City of Santa Cruz Water Department staff, and found to be constructed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and City building permit. Two change orders were issued during construction totaling $13,520.00 and remained within the previously approved 10% contingency.

The contractor made a good-faith effort to meet the requirements of the City’s Local Hire Ordinance and to employ apprentices on the Project.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: City Council found the Project to be exempt under CEQA at its meeting on November 19, 2024.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): This Project aligned with the sustainability pillar of the City’s HiAP policy by reducing waste and saving the City’s financial resources.

FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: No

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: The final cost of all work under this contract was $253,000. Project costs were shared between the Water Department, with funds from the Water Department’s Capital Investment Program budget (project c702107), and funds from the Library.

Prepared By:

Isidro Rivera
Deputy Water
Director/Engineering Manager
Submitted By:

Heidi Luckenbach
Water Director
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. NOTICE OF COMPLETION.DOCX

15.2 Notice of Completion (Revised Oct 2021)
(Space above for Recorder’s use only)
This instrument is being recorded for the benefit of the City of Santa Cruz.

No recording fee is required pursuant to Government Code § 27383.

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(CA Civil Code Sections 8102 and 9204)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

The undersigned is an authorized representative of the owner of the interest or estate stated below.

1. The Owner’s Name and Address. The Project owner is the City of Santa Cruz, a municipal corporation (the “City”). The City’s mailing address is 809 Center Street, Santa Cruz, California 95060. The City of Santa Cruz has the following interest in the subject Property described below: City Property

2. Project Title and Number. The full name of the work of improvement/public works project (the “Project”) which is the subject of this Notice of Completion is: Union Locust Backup Generator Project, c702107.

3. Nature of Work Performed on the Property or Materials Furnished for the City. The Project consisted of work described as: Installation of a repurposed 100-kw natural gas generator with new electrical conduits, and gas piping; installation of a new concrete pad and pathway; and installation of an exhaust system for the generator.

4. The general site location description or address (the “Property”) of the public improvement is located at: 212 Locust Street/117 Union Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060.

5. Name and Address of Contractor. The Contractor on the Project is: unWired Broadband, LLC. 215 W Fallbrook Ave, Fresno, CA 93711.

6. Construction Lender. The name and address of the construction lender, if any, is: None.

7. Date of Completion. The Project on the Property was completed on: February 24, 2026.

8. The filing of this Notice of Completion was authorized by the Santa Cruz City Council Minute Order on Tuesday, April 28, 2026.

DATE: ___________________
Heidi Luckenbach, P.E.

RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF:

City of Santa Cruz, Water
Attn: Jason Segal
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk’s Department
809 Center Street, Room 9
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

15.3 Notice of Completion (Revised Oct 2021)
Water Director, City of Santa Cruz

15.4 Notice of Completion (Revised Oct 2021) 15.5
City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/09/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: Economic Development
SUBJECT: Approval of 2026 Program Year (PY) Annual Action Plan (AAP) (ED) LOCATION: Citywide
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Adopt a resolution for the City’s 2026-2027 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Annual Action Plan (AAP);
2) Direct staff to submit the 2026-2027 AAP to HUD, and authorize the City Manager to sign an application for federal funding assistance for the 2026-2027 program year; and 3) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute program/project contracts, loan and grant agreements and related loan documents with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) sub-recipients and contractors in connection with Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) activities proposed in the 2026-2027 AAP and any subsequent revisions to the 2026-2027 AAP.

BACKGROUND: For extensive background information on the history and context of the federal Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, and the HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) program, please see attachment titled AAP Supplemental Information.

A draft of the Annual Action Plan (AAP) has been available online for public review since March 28, 2026 (see link below). To date, no comments have been received. To meet established HUD deadlines, final awards cannot be pushed beyond this second public hearing on April 28, 2026. Staff recommends the City Council finalize the recommendations made at the March 10, 2026 meeting by adopting the attached resolution. Staff will update the AAP based on the outcome of today’s public hearing, and the AAP will be available for review and public comment for another 15 days before submitting to HUD in May. https://www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-departments/economic-development/housingassistance-information/hud-programs/hud-consolidated-plan-documents

16.1 DISCUSSION: HUD released the annual awards for Program Year (PY) 2026 on April 7, 2026.

For the 2026 PY, the City will receive $497,393 in CDBG funds from HUD which is a 6% decrease from last year and from earlier estimated totals. Combined with Program Income estimated at $15,000, and an anticipated $160 in prior year funding being available for reprogramming, the total CDBG budget is $512,553. The City will receive $237,080.42 in HOME funds from HUD which is a 7% decrease from last year, but a slight increase from earlier estimated totals. Combined with an additional estimated $100,000 of Program Income and $456,761 in reprogrammable funds from prior years, the total amount available is $793,841. The activity award amounts listed below are conditional upon receiving funds from HUD and the activities meeting the requirements set forth by HUD.

CDBG PROGRAM BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
Funding recommendations include $102,479 of the total available funds budgeted for Program Administration costs. Administration funding is set by HUD formula to 20% of the HUD grant plus estimated Program Income. The City is required to maintain prior rehabilitation programs’ debt servicing, and it is recommended to fund this activity at $4,000. The Housing Authority of Santa Cruz County (Housing Authority) administers the HOME Security Deposit Program for City residents and incurs certain delivery costs while administering the program, therefore it is recommended the delivery costs are funded at $6,900. As mentioned above, the CDBG award is 6% lower than last year, therefore funding award recommendations must be adjusted from prior estimates. The 150 Felker St. Affordable Housing Project (150 Felker St. Project) can absorb most of this reduction as there are other funds that can potentially fill this gap. As to the Public Services (PS), the Teen Center initial request has already been reduced, therefore, to meet the PS cap, based on the reduced award, it is proposed that Second Harvest Food Bank absorb the required decrease.

Public Services are recommended to be funded at the following levels: the Teen Center ($35,000), Nueva Vista ($150,000) and Second Harvest Food Bank ($39,609). Nueva Vista has previously received CDBG funding and is certified as a Community Based Development Organization (CBDO) in the City of Santa Cruz. The Teen Center and Second Harvest Food Bank are also previous CDBG program fund recipients. These recommendations would fund Public Services within the 15% cap of $74,609 set by HUD. Although it appears that funds are exceeding the HUD mandated Public Service cap by approximately $150,000, the $150,000 awarded to Nueva Vista for Public Services can be excluded from this category while they maintain their status as a CBDO as described in the attached AAP Supplemental Information, so this category can be funded for a total of $224,609.

Project funding includes recommendations to fund the Monarch Services ADA Renovation Project for $104,155 and the 150 Felker St. Project for $70,410. The Monarch Services project proposes building an ADA ramp, updating the aging bathroom which currently is not fully ADA compliant, and replacing a wheelchair lift. The Felker St. Affordable Housing project includes infrastructure improvements and the new construction of 44 rental apartments, 43 of which will be affordable to households earning 30-50% AMI.

HOME PROGRAM BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
The HOME Program also sets aside a portion of awarded funds for the administration of the HOME Program which is $33,708. Project funding recommendations include the 150 Felker St.

Project which is recommended to be funded at $660,113. This project aligns with the Con Plan goals as it proposes long-term housing affordability through the new construction of 44 rental

16.2 apartments, 43 of which will be affordable to households earning 30-50% AMI. Of these affordable units, 22 units will be reserved for homeless veteran households receiving Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) rental assistance. An additional 2 units will receive general Project Based Voucher (PBV) assistance. The Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) portion of the HOME award is contingent on the Felker project meeting HUD requirements. If the applicant is not eligible for CHDO status or not able to meet Build America Buy America (BABA) requirements or provide an official BABA waiver, the CHDO portion of the HOME funding award will be reallocated to another project requestor or set aside for future allocation by the City Council.

Program funding includes recommendations to fund the Security Deposit Program at $100,000.

This program has been funded by multiple sources since its inception in 1997. During the current PY, 22 households have been assisted to date. The Housing Authority has seen increases in prior program years and is anticipating the demand to continue through the next program year.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: At its meeting on March 10, 2026, the City Council adopted a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to sections 15301 (existing facilities), 15332 (infill development), and 15061 (common sense) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines for this action.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): Funding for the Public Service activities is consistent with the HiAP framework, especially the pillars of equity, and sustainability. The external CDBG Public Service programs support the goal of investing in local organizations.

Additionally, because the NRSA allows the City to fund public services at levels above the 15% cap, the City can provide additional funding to Nueva Vista Community Resources, located in the City's lowest income neighborhoods. The HOME program and project recommendations are also consistent with the HiAP framework, directly fulfilling the "Stable, Affordable Housing & Shelter" Collective of Results and Evidence-based (CORE) condition. Equity will be positively impacted with the future creation of more affordable housing units for all members of the community as well as access to the HOME Security Deposit Program that helps households attain and retain housing.

FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: No

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: No General Funds are included in the proposed draft budget. Until funds are committed by HUD, there is no fiscal impact for the City from the proposed actions. Under the final proposed budget, approximately $512,553 in CDBG and $793,8419 in HOME Program funds will be appropriated in the City’s FY 2027 budget as part of the annual budget cycle.

16.3 Prepared By:

Jess Mellor
Principal Management
Analyst
Jessica de Wit
Housing & Community
Development Manager
Submitted By:

Bonnie Lipscomb
Deputy City Manager
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. AAP SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION.PDF

2. RESOLUTION – 2026 HUD AAP.DOCX

3. 2026 AAP BUDGET.PDF

16.4 City of Santa Cruz Affordable Housing Division
Annual Action Plan Supplemental Information
The City of Santa Cruz (City) receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) entitlement funding annually from the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). To obtain these funds, the City must develop and adopt a five-year Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) which identifies and analyzes strategies for addressing specific community needs. The five-year Con Plan provides strategic direction for housing and community development activities carried out in the City.

The 2025-2030 Con Plan was drafted by consultant firm Grow America with input from City staff and is effective as of the beginning of Program Year (PY) 2025 which began on July 1, 2025 and runs through PY 2029 which ends on June 30, 2030. The Con Plan was prepared in accordance with HUD’s eCon Planning Suite which provides a standardized template through HUD’s nationwide database.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN PROCESS
The Con Plan is divided into six sections.

1. Executive Summary

2. The Process

3. Needs Assessment

4. Market Analysis

5. Strategic Plan

6. First-Year Action Plan
An Annual Action Plan (AAP) is approved for each year covered by the Con Plan as the vehicle to implement Con Plan strategies. AAPs set the annual budget, allocating funds from that year’s CDBG and HOME funding entitlement, any unused or uncommitted funds from prior years, and any Program Income (PI) received during the preceding year. The City must annually approve an AAP which specifies activities that will be undertaken during that PY. A core component of the AAP is the budget which determines CDBG and HOME Program funding. Final funding numbers from HUD are typically provided by mid-March each year barring any delays from Congress; therefore, staff typically prepare a draft budget based on estimated funding for the first public hearing.

During the AAP preparation period, staff completed a technical review of CDBG and HOME applications based on regulatory requirements, best practices suggested by HUD, analysis of HUD

16.5 audit risks, current Con Plan priority needs and associated needs, and program knowledge.

Funding recommendations are based on the CDBG and HOME application requests reviewed by the Health in All Policies Committee (HiAP) annually in February at the first of two public hearings for the AAP. City Council (Council) then receives an update with HiAP recommendations in March and directs staff to prepare and post a draft of the AAP for a 30-day public review. Once the review period is concluded, Council receives the final funding recommendations based on final CDBG and HOME awards from HUD and approves the submittal of the AAP to HUD at a second public hearing.

The Con Plan and AAP are normally due to HUD by mid-May.

CDBG PROGRAM OVERVIEW
CDBG funds can be used for a wide range of community development activities including but not limited to neighborhood revitalization and improved community facilities and services. Examples of activities that can be funded with CDBG dollars include but are not limited to: acquisition of real property, acquisition and construction of public works and facilities, reconstruction and rehabilitation of residential and nonresidential properties, homeownership assistance, and the provision of public services such as employment, food banks, crime prevention, childcare, health, drug abuse, education, and fair housing counseling. The primary beneficiaries of CDBG funded projects or programs must be very-low, low, and moderate-income person(s) and household(s).

Other beneficiaries of CDBG funded projects can include seniors, homeless persons, and disabled adults.

HUD regulations limit how CDBG funds are used. The City is only allowed to spend up to 15% of the annual award and PI on Public Service activities (also sometimes referred to as Programs).

The remaining award is divided between physical projects and administration. The City’s CDBG funded programs or projects must either benefit low-income areas (Area Benefit) or low-income individuals (Limited Clientele). The City is limited by HUD in the total amount of funding that can be awarded to Area Benefit projects and programs in any given PY and HUD requires a minimum of 70% of CDBG funds directly benefit low- and moderate-income persons which would be under the Limited Clientele benefit. Programs receiving funding under Limited Clientele requirements must document that at least 51% of their clientele are low-income. To qualify under Area Benefit, an activity must be located in and serve a low-income neighborhood.

The City’s primary low-income neighborhoods in the Beach Flats and Lower Ocean make up the City’s HUD Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (NRSA). This area is a priority for CDBG funding. HUD approves NRSA designations with the expectation that there will be increased CDBG funding utilized in these areas, therefore ensuring that these areas are improving.

Community Based Development Organizations (CBDOs) must be located within the NRSA and must maintain a governing board of directors comprised of a mix of at least 51%: low-income residents, executive level entrepreneurs in the neighborhood and governing members of neighborhood groups. CBDOs located within a HUD approved NRSA can receive funding for Public Services over the usual 15% cap on this category of funding. The City currently has one qualified CBDO - Nueva Vista Community Resources (Nueva Vista). The NRSA designation is required for a CBDO to be exempt from the Public Services 15% maximum funding cap and facilitates providing additional funding to the NRSA.

16.6 When considering programs and projects to fund with CDBG, a subgrantee’s ability to expend funds in a timely manner is an important consideration. HUD requires that the City as a grantee adhere to timely spending practices, which means the City needs to review program and project progress and adjust as needed to ensure timely spending of CDBG funds. When HUD CDBG timeliness requirements are not met, the City can face negative consequences such as increased HUD oversight in funding allocations, the City needing to formulate a HUD approved remediation plan to spend program funds more quickly and, ultimately,a reduction of funds available to spend in the jurisdiction.

HOME PROGRAM OVERVIEW
HOME Program funds are exclusively used to help provide housing for low-income households.

This can be done in two ways. Funding assistance can be provided to: (1) help develop or rehabilitate income restricted housing units or (2) support programs that provide financial assistance directly to low-income renters or home buyers enabling them to then access or retain housing. To oversee programs and projects using HOME Program funding, HUD sets the administration levels at 10% of the combined grant allocation plus PI.

The City must set aside 15% of each grant to be used only by a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO). Habitat for Humanity Santa Cruz County, Mid-Peninsula the Farm, Inc., and Eden South Bay, Inc. have all qualified as CHDOs in the past and are currently operating in the region.

APPLICATION PROCESS AND RANKING
The City accepts applications for CDBG and HOME funds between mid-October to midDecember each year and reviews applications for completeness and eligibility before ranking projects using a set rubric of scoring criteria. The criteria include funding leveraging, program or project readiness, focus area of the project (City vs. Countywide), alignment with the City’s Consolidated Plan goals and priorities, and CDBG or HOME grant experience. Depending on how an application scores, it is then ranked against other applications in its category (Programs or Projects).

HUD restricts City CDBG funding that can be awarded to Public Services. City best practices have been to limit the number of Public Service programs and physical Projects funded each year, as splitting the pool of available funds too many ways can limit the benefits of the funded programs or projects or could cause the program or project to not be able to move forward at all causing a loss of services to the community. The City incurs significantly more costs to administer multiple smaller programs and projects and risks to cause timeliness issues due to the burden of administrative work to support them.

Projects or programs not awarded in the current AAP are able to submit applications in future AAP years for review and ranking.

16.7 RESOLUTION NO. NS-30,XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ ADOPTING THE CITY’S 2026-2027 HUD ANNUAL ACTION PLAN, ALLOCATING CDBG AND

HOME FUNDING, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AN

APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL FUNDING AND EXECUTE ALL CONTRACTS AND DOCUMENTS FOR THE 2026-2027 PROGRAM YEAR AND SUBMIT DOCUMENTS TO HUD
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Cruz is a designated U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) entitlement grantee that annually receives federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) grant funds from HUD; and
WHEREAS, HUD requires that any jurisdiction receiving federal CDBG and HOME grant funds from HUD prepare an Annual Action Plan (AAP) to allocate grant funds; and WHEREAS, HUD requires that any jurisdiction receiving federal CDBG and HOME grant funds from HUD prepare an AAP to identify the activities that will be undertaken in the coming 2026-2027 Program Year (PY) and requires noticing of and a public comment period for adoption of current AAPs or amendments to prior AAPs, Consolidated Plans, and Community Participation Plan in accordance with the City’s Community Participation Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council, in accordance with its approved Community Participation Plan, held public hearings on February 4, 2026 and April 28, 2026, for the purpose of soliciting input from the public on the proposed 2026-2027 AAP; and WHEREAS, the City Council directed the preparation of an AAP and an application to HUD for funding for the 2026-2027 PY, following consideration of comments and recommendations following a publicly noticed 30 day public review period for the 2026-2027 AAP; and
WHEREAS, the City Council certifies that it has fulfilled the requirements for, decisionmaking and action pertaining to development of the federal funding application for the 2026-2027 PY; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz adopted a program of activities to be funded under the federal 2025-2030 Con Plan for the 2026-2027 PY as the 2026-2027 HUD AAP; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on March 10, 2026, the City Council adopted a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to sections 15301 (existing facilities), 15332 (infill development), and 15061 (common sense) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines for this action; and

16.8 WHEREAS, allocations have been made to various non-profit and public subrecipient organizations, to provide funding for public services, facilities, housing and other projects; and WHEREAS, the approved sub-grantee organizations are profit, nonprofit or public agencies created and operated for the purpose of providing public services, facilities, housing and other projects.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz as follows:

Section 1. The foregoing resolutions are true and correct.

Section 2. The City Council hereby adopts a resolution for the City’s 2026-2027 HUD Annual Action Plan (AAP), direct staff to submit the 2026-2027 AAP, and authorize the City Manager to sign an application for federal funding assistance for the 2026-2027 program year.

Section 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute program/project contracts, loan agreements and related loan documents with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) subrecipients and contractors in connection with Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) activities proposed in the 2026-2027 AAP and any subsequent revisions to the 2026-2027 AAP.

Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of April, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: ______________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

16.9 $497,393 2026 CDBG Entitlement Grant (Estimated)
$15,000 Estimated 2026 Program Income (PI)
$160 Prior Years' CDBG Funds Available for Reprogramming $512,553 Total CDBG Program Budget
$102,479 City Program Administration Funding for CDBG (by formula) $410,074 CDBG Funding Available for Allocation
$237,080 2026 HOME Program Entitlement Grant (Estimated) $100,000 Estimated 2026 Year Program Income (PI)
$456,761 Prior Years' HOME Funds Available for Reprogramming $793,841 Total HOME Program Budget
$33,708 City Program Administration Funding for HOME (by formula) $760,133 HOME Program Funding Available for Allocation

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)

HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM (HOME)
2026 PROGRAM YEAR (PY) BUDGET

HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (HCD) PROGRAM

16.10 ADMINISTRATION (FORMULA: 20% of total Entitlement and Program Income) Activity: Grant Administration $102,479
Applicant: City of Santa Cruz (By Formula)
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION FUNDING AVAILABLE $102,479
Requested
Funding
Prior Year
Funding
Recommended
Funding
Activity: Rehabilitation Program Delivery Costs $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 Applicant: City of Santa Cruz
Activity: HOME Security Deposit Program Delivery Costs $6,900 $6,900 $6,900 Applicant: Housing Authority of Santa Cruz County
TOTAL ONGOING CITY PROGRAMS $10,900
Requested
Funding
Prior Year
Funding
Recommended
Funding
Activity: Teen Center $45,000 $45,000 $35,000
Applicant: City of Santa Cruz
Activity: Food Banks $55,000 $25,000 $39,609
Applicant: Second Harvest Food Banks
TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICES SUBJECT TO 15% CAP $74,609
Activity: Nueva Vista & Beach Flats Community Centers (CBDO) $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Applicant: Nueva Vista Resources
TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICE FUNDING (INCLUDING CBDO) $224,609
Requested
Funding
Prior Year
Funding
Recommended
Funding
Activity: Monarch Services ADA Renovation Project
Applicant: Monarch Services $104,155 $0 $104,155
Activity: Felker St Affordable Housing Project
Applicant: Linc Housing $500,000 $0 $70,410
TOTAL PROJECTS FUNDING $174,565
GRAND TOTAL CDBG FUNDING $512,553
PUBLIC SERVICES (Subject to 15% CAP)*

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
* Public Services Cap is calculated by adding estimated allocation with actual received PI for prior program year 2026 PY CDBG BUDGET

CDBG PROGRAM BUDGET
2026 PROGRAM YEAR
$102,479

CITY PROGRAMS

16.11 ADMINISTRATION (Formula: 10% of total Entitlement and Program Income) Activity: Grant Administration & Planning $33,708
Applicant: City of Santa Cruz Economic Development
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION $33,708
CITY PROGRAMS Requested
Funding
Prior Year
Funding
Recommended
Funding

TOTAL NEW HOME FUNDING
Activity: HOME Security Deposit Program $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Applicant: Housing Authority of Santa Cruz County
PROJECTS & PROGRAMS Requested
Funding
Prior Year
Funding
Recommended
Funding
Activity: CHDO Set-Aside (by formula) $35,562 $0.00 $35,562 Applicant: Linc Housing (if eligible )
Activity: Felker St Affordable Housing Project $200,000 $0 $624,571 Applicant: Linc Housing
$760,133
TOTAL HOME FUNDING BUDGETED AMOUNT $793,841
2026 PY HOME BUDGET

HOME PROGRAM BUDGET
2026 PROGRAM YEAR

TOTAL NEW HOME FUNDING

TOTAL PROJECT/PROGRAM FUNDING

16.12 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/06/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: Fire
SUBJECT: Report on City Wildfire Preparedness Ad Hoc Committee Deliverables and Proposed Next Steps (FD)
LOCATION: Citywide
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Receive a report on the activities of the Wildfire Preparedness Ad Hoc Committee, summarizing the committee’s work over the past twelve months, including key findings, collaborative efforts, and final deliverables; and
2) Direct staff to proceed with the associated Wildfire Preparedness Communications Strategy.

BACKGROUND: On February 11, 2025, the City Council directed staff to initiate a Comprehensive Wildfire Preparedness and Safety Program and to form a City Council Wildfire Preparedness Ad Hoc Committee (Committee) composed of Councilmembers O’Hara, Trigueiro, and Golder. Over the past year, the Committee met regularly to review wildfire risk, evaluate existing preparedness efforts, identify opportunities to strengthen citywide internal and stakeholder coordination, and build out a clear public-facing communication strategy. The Committee focused on practical, actionable steps to improve how wildfire information is organized, communicated, and shared with the community, City staff, and elected officials.

Through this work, the Committee also identified opportunities to improve communication and coordination between staff and the City Council regarding ongoing wildfire preparedness initiatives and community engagement.

DISCUSSION: Over the past year, the Committee developed two deliverables:
• A Communications Strategy including an Emergency Preparedness Portal and a public wildfire preparedness campaign, Ready, Prep, Go SC!, and; • A matrix of wildfire preparedness plans and initiatives that provides a living inventory of wildfire-related plans and regulations.

These documents align with the City Council’s direction to initiate a Comprehensive Wildfire Preparedness and Safety Program and to support community engagement and education efforts.

17.1 The two deliverables work together to bridge the emergency preparedness, planning, and mitigation work done by staff (organized in the matrix) with City Council and staff -led community action and engagement (through the Communications Strategy). These efforts, particularly the Communications Strategy, apply to all natural disasters that could impact the community and can therefore be used as a transferable strategy for emergency preparedness across various topics. Any additional funding needs to support these efforts will be explored moving forward.

The process of documenting existing wildfire preparedness efforts through a matrix of projects and initiatives, and then using this matrix as a communication tool to identify opportunities to partner more effectively with the City Council and the community, is a replicable strategy that the emergency management program will use going forward.

The Communications Strategy includes an emergency preparedness portal and the Ready, Prep, Go SC! outreach campaign. The elements of this Communications Strategy offer public-facing wildfire messaging, tools, and resources to ensure that the community is aware of City work in the Wildfire Preparedness and Response space, and activates the community to do their part to be prepared as well. This strategy bridges the emergency planning documents and program elements into accessible, actionable guidance for residents, businesses, and community partners, supporting awareness and preparedness before wildfire events occur.

The matrix of wildfire preparedness plans and initiatives supports these efforts by organizing existing City and partner activities into a centralized, transparent reference document. This matrix improves internal coordination by clarifying how plans, policies, and initiatives relate to one another and by improving access to information for staff and elected officials.

The development of both the planning matrix and the Communications Strategy strengthen coordination and reinforce a unified City approach to wildfire preparedness while also providing a template for other seasonally relevant strategic emergency preparedness messages critical to the safety of our community.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: This action is not a “project” under CEQA because it does not meet all of the requirements set out in Pub. Resources Code § 21605. See also CEQA Guidelines (§ 15378(b)(2) and § 15378(b)(5).

The Council action is not a project because it falls under “general policy and procedure making” and/or “organizational or administrative activities” that do not result in physical changes to the environment.

In the alternative, if the Council action is considered a CEQA “project”, it is exempt from further CEQA review under the following exceptions:
• CEQA Guidelines § 15061(b)(3) – The commonsense exemption, because it can be shown with certainty that the proposed Council action will have no effect or a positive effect on the environment.
• CEQA Guidelines § 15306 – data collection and information gathering.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): The work of the Wildfire Preparedness Ad Hoc Committee supports the City’s Health in All Policies (HiAP) framework by advancing coordinated, community-centered approaches to wildfire preparedness, risk communication, and mitigation. The committee’s focus on improving how wildfire information is organized,

17.2 communicated, and shared across the community directly supports the public health and equity pillars of HiAP by increasing awareness of wildfire risk among residents, staff, and vulnerable populations, and by promoting accessible, understandable preparedness guidance that can be acted upon before an emergency occurs.

FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: No

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: None.

Prepared By:

Meredith Albert
Principal Management
Analyst
Submitted By:

Rob Oatey
Fire Chief
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY.PDF

17.3 City of Santa Cruz
READY, PREP, GO SC!
Wildfire safety starts with all of us
Communications Strategy
1 17.4
Contents
Purpose
Goals
Core Campaign Messages
Campaign Elements
Campaign Platforms / Information Platforms
Timeline
Evaluation
2 17.5
Ready, Prep, Go SC!
The City of Santa Cruz Ready, Prep, Go SC! campaign
is designed as a multi-hazard emergencypreparedness communications initiative.

The campaign offers a way to share information about
the City of Santa Cruzʼs emergency preparedness
and hazard mitigation efforts through a public
information plan focused on partnering with the
community to build resilience.
3 17.6
The Purpose
Ready, Prep, Go SC! is designed to apply to all hazards Wildfire
Winter storms
Earthquakes
Tsunami
Coastal hazards
Extreme heat
Power outages
Flooding
Seasonal and emerging risks
4 17.7
Overall Campaign Goals:

Communicate existing City efforts to mitigate the risk of hazards and prepare for disasters.

Empower community members to prepare for disasters.

Strengthen partnerships with community groups and partner agencies such as Firewise groups, Federal and State agencies, UCSC, and County partners such as the Office of Resilience, Response, and Recovery, as well as Animal Services, and any others.

Normalize disaster preparedness as part of everyday life in Santa Cruz, similar to recycling, water conservation, and neighborhood safety.

Social Media Goals:

Centralize information about natural hazards for City residents.

Offer clear actions for residents to prepare for a range of hazards.

Create a sense of urgency and shared responsibility before seasonal risks.

Promote campaign events and preparedness resources.

Drive traffic to the Cityʼs Preparedness Portal.

Create a platform for dialogue and feedback between the community and City around disaster preparedness.

Reinforce official sources of emergency public information.

17.8 5
Core Campaign Messages
Ready, Prep, GO SC!
Preparedness is a shared responsibility
The City prepares for emergencies, and residents must prepare too. The Cityʼs resilience- its ability to recover from natural disasters- depends on this partnership.

Prepare now
Small steps save lives. Build a go-bag, make a family plan, and plan to receive and act upon emergency information.

Preparedness can be practical and engaging
Community events like a community preparedness run make readiness visible, family-friendly, and action-focused.

Ready, Prep, GO SC!
Ready, Prep, GO SC! offers the community tools and guidance.

The campaign helps people know what to do before, during, and after emergencies.
6 17.9
Campaign Elements:

READY — Understand the Risk
What hazards affect Santa Cruz
What seasonal risks lay ahead
What warning information looks like
Where to get official info
Register for alert systems (CruzAware / Genasys
Protect)
PREP — Take Specific Actions
Talk to neighbors
Plan for emergencies in different settings (school,
work, home)
Build Go-bags / Shelter-in-place Kits
Prepare a list of necessary critical documents to take
(DMV records, birth certificates, social security cards, house insurance, tax and investment documents)
Family plans
Evacuation routes
Pet planning
Home mitigation
Planning for community members with access and
functional needs
Backup power and communications plans
Go SC — Act Early
Evacuate early
Follow official guidance
Plan to share resources such as vehicles
Know multiple routes and zones
Bring go-bag + pets + meds
Check in with family, neighbors, and community
7 17.10
Campaign Platforms
City Preparedness Portal (Website)
Translates information from City emergency plans
and programs into accessible public messaging
that prompts community action.

Provides downloadable planning documents such
as checklists (family evacuation plans, pet
readiness, defensible space guides).

Provides a way for residents to submit questions
and share preparedness ideas
(www.santacruzca.gov/prepfeedbackform).

Social Media
Focus on the seasonal interpretation of:
“Readyˮ: Understand the risks (infographics).
“Prepˮ: Steps residents can take (checklists,
short how-to videos).
“GOˮ: Evacuation readiness (go-bag photos,
drills, pet plans, and more).

Outreach Events
Race the Flame (with UCSC) 2026: A community run/walk simulating a wildfire evacuation route and emergency preparedness fair. The goal is to raise awareness of wildfire risk while building City coordination with public-safety partner agencies and organizations.
8 www.santacruzca.gov/prepare

17.11 Seasonal Campaign Focus
This Communications Strategy recognizes that the best outreach practice is to ensure messaging is audience-driven, timely, and relevant to local factors. Ensuring that the City communicates at strategic times without oversaturating communications channels is key to optimizing community receptiveness to critical messages such as wildfire preparedness.

Seasonal Risks / Calendar Integration
The annual calendar of preparedness themes provides a guiding framework for aligning outreach with seasonal risks and nationally recognized preparedness months. It is intended as a reference tool to support consistent, timely messaging, not as a requirement or commitment to produce new messaging each month. The calendar offers structure and flexibility, allowing the City to scale communications based on capacity, emerging risks, and operational priorities.
9 17.12
MONTH

JANUARY

FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER
THEME
Winter Weather Preparedness
Coastal Safety & Beach Hazards
Flood Safety
Extreme Weather
Wildfire – National Wildfire Awareness Month
Heat Safety & Evacuation Readiness
Heat Safety & Fireworks Safety
Back to School – Youth Preparedness
National Preparedness Month
Earthquake, Cybersecurity
Tsunami Awareness + Winter
Readiness International Tsunami Awareness Day —
Nov 5
Power Outage + Holiday Preparedness
Seasonal Campaign Calendar
10 17.13
Finalize materials and set up
Preparedness Portal, draft social media
calendar to guide outreach.

January- February (Pre-launch)
Integrate Ready, Prep, Go SC! Into ongoing
coordination with agency partners as we plan
coordination with partner agencies to plan
outreach events.

Continue to align social media outreach,
community engagement and events with
Ready, Prep, Go SC! Campaign goals.

Integrate Ready, Prep, Go SC! message into
orders of printed outreach materials
Continuing Campaign
Timeline
11 Campaign presentation to council + first
wave of social posts focused on
preparedness themes aligned with the
outreach calendar.

April 2026

17.14 Evaluation
Website metrics: Page views, downloads from Preparedness Portal.

Social media analytics: Engagement rates, shares, impressions- rates and trends overtime.

Event success: Attendance numbers, partner participation, and earned media coverage.

Community feedback: Survey results on preparedness confidence levels. www.santacruzca.gov/prepfeedbackform
12 17.15
City of Santa Cruz
READY, PREP, GO SC!
Wildfire safety starts with all of us
Communications Strategy
www.santacruzca.gov/prepare
13 17.16
Brittany Inclan
From: Judi Grunstra <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2026 8:42 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Agenda item 17
Dear Mayor and Council,
In reading the Ad Hoc committee’s report, the item that stood out as being of great importance is the Race the Flame event, which would demonstrate the reality of a large scale community evacuation in the event of a spreading wildfire. The report recommends a 2026 date but I don’t see any more mention.

I suggest you determine a date, because much coordination will be needed. Will it be after tourist season? Only by having a large scale city-wide evacuation practice will city leaders and residents be able to evaluate the capacities of our roadways, and need for assistance for people who don’t have cars. As you know, there are limited routes out of the city, especially the west side, with bike lanes creating even fewer lanes for cars. Will this exercise be chaotic or orderly? We need to learn and apply what we learn, should a real evacuation be needed.

With dense housing being added, future planning should be based on our city’s capacity to assure safety for ourselves and to communicate this with state legislators.

Thank you.

Judi Grunstra

17.17 READY, PREP, GO SC!
Communications Strategy
City of Santa Cruz
Wildfire safety starts with all of us

17.18 PREPAREDNESS

RECOVERY RESPONSE

MITIGATION

EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT
CYCLE
Local Hazard Mitigation- Wildfire Preparedness
Climate Adaptation Plan
Community Wildfire Resiliency Plan
Emergency Operations Plan
Alert and Warning Annex
Heat Emergency Annex
Parks and Open Space Master Plans
Care and Shelter Annex
Wildfire Annex
Earthquake Annex
Tsunami Annex
Extreme Weather Annex
Neighborhood Sustainability and
Resilience Workshops
Sustainability and Resiliency Committee
Public Safety Committee
Water Commission
Transportation and Public Works Commission
Planning Commission
Safe Beach Day Planning
Community Preparedness Events
Health in All Policies
Risk Management Policy
Forest Management of Water Department Watershed Lands
Citywide Strategic Plan 2023-2028
Evacuation Annex
Flood Annex
City 2030 General Plan
County Emergency Management Council
SCZFD Standards of Cover Survey Santa Cruz FireWise
City Schools Annual Coordination
UCSC Quarterly Fire Safety Mtg
UCSC Monthly EM mtg

17.19 What the Committee produced
COMMITTEE OUTCOMES:

From Fragmentation to a Whole Community Approach
Why it matters…
What the Committee learned

17.20 Communicate
existing City
efforts focused
on hazard
mitigation /
emergency
management
Empower residents to take
responsibility
Normalize hazard
mitigation and
preparedness
Build community partnerships around
hazard mitigation and preparedness

OUR CAMPAIGN GOALS

17.21 CORE CAMPAIGN MESSAGES —READY, PREP, GO SC!

1. Preparedness is a shared
responsibility

3. Preparedness can be
practical and engaging
The City is preparing, but
residents must also prepare;
safety depends on both.

4. Ready, Prep, GO SC!
The campaign helps people
know what to do before,
during, and after
emergencies.

Community events can make
readiness visible, familyfriendly, and action-focused.

2. Prepare now
Small steps (like creating a
go-bag, drafting a family
plan) can make a life-saving
difference.

17.22 City emergency preparedness plans
Downloadable checklists
Community feedback form
Get to know your evacuation zone

PREPAREDNESS PORTAL

17.23 Family evacuation
plans
Pet preparedness
guide
Distributed via
Firewise, libraries,
schools
Spanish Translated
Materials

OUTREACH MATERIALS

17.24 SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN

17.25 SEASONAL FOCUS TO ADDRESS CYCLE OF RISK
• Seasonal risks
• Calendar for community engagement
• Perennial partnership for
preparedness

17.26 • 226 people registered
• Distributed 220 NOAA weather radios
• 12 community organizations and 28 representatives
who tabled at the Emergency Preparedness Fair

17.27 • Community run/walk evacuation
route.
• Preparedness Event: Fire Dept,
County, UCSC, Red Cross, CERT.

Swag: “GO Bag” sample kits.
• Neighborhood Resiliency
Workshops
• High media interest

OUTREACH EVENTS

17.28 • Website metrics: views, downloads
• Social media analytics: engagement
• Event success: attendance, media, # of NOAA Weather Radios • Community and partner feedback: feedback form

MEASURING SUCCESS

17.29 Community
City
RECOMMENDATIONS: SUSTAIN & GROW READY, PREP, GO S
•Take Action
•Stay Engaged
•Get Information & Share Information
•Keep It Simple
•Meet People Where They Are
•High Visibility
•Adapt and iterate- Keep learning

17.30 READY, PREP, GO SC!
City of Santa Cruz
Wildfire safety starts with all of us
QUESTIONS?

17.31 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/09/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: Active Transportation Plan Adoption (PW)
LOCATION: Citywide
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Adopt a resolution approving and adopting the recommendations of the 2026 updates to the City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan; and
2) Adopt a CEQA finding of Statutory Exemption under California Public Resources Code section 21080.20.

BACKGROUND: The City of Santa Cruz (City) was awarded funding from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant program to update the current Active Transportation Plan (ATP) which Council adopted in February 2017.

The updated ATP will be the guide for implementing active transportation projects, programs, and policies within the City to advance multimodal mobility.

The City was one of the first in the state to complete an ATP in 2017. That planning document was used to help secure over $56 million in outside grant funding to implement active transportation projects. The updates build on that plan and utilize a Vision Zero and Safe Systems framework to assess, recommend, and determine an implementation framework for active transportation programs and projects within the City. Adopting the updated ATP both provides a vision for future investments and continues to help the City compete for outside grant funding.

The goal of the ATP is to create an updated framework for active transportation investments that will enhance safety and mobility for all roadway users, increase the livability in neighborhoods, and increase connectivity and access to schools, parks, housing, and other multimodal facilities.

DISCUSSION: The ATP update is complete and available for public review and comment. The 2026 update included an existing conditions assessment, three phases of public outreach and engagement, three Technical Advisory Committee meetings, an evaluation of active transportation needs, and development of the project list and prioritization framework.

18.1 The project was divided into three phases: existing conditions and needs identification, draft recommendations and prioritization, and draft and final plan.

In the first phase, the major work was a review of existing conditions and preliminary community engagement. Through robust stakeholder and community engagement, the project team established four goals to guide the updated ATP. These are:
1) Build and maintain comprehensive bicycle and transportation networks 2) Enhance safety and security for active transportation users 3) Continue progress and investments in active transportation 4) Provide education and encouragement
In the second project phase, the team did additional outreach work with the community, stakeholder groups, the Technical Advisory Committee, and Transportation and Public Works Commission (TPWC). Preliminary findings were presented at a public ATP Open House at London Nelson on August 12, 2025, followed by an update to the Transportation and Public Works Commission (TPWC) on September 15, 2025. The second phase of the project synthesized the community and stakeholder feedback and informed the development draft recommendations and project prioritization.

The third and final phase of the project utilized research, engagement, and best practices to develop the recommended programs, policies, and projects. These were then prioritized using a three-prong prioritization framework. Safety was the highest weighted, followed by access and equity. The prioritization framework was modified for greater clarity based on feedback received by TPWC at their November 17, 2025 meeting.

After the November TPWC meeting, the project team updated the project list and created the first draft of the plan. An ATP Open House was hosted on January 28th, 2026 at Gault Elementary to receive feedback on the draft plan. The event was attended by over 80 community members. Following the Open House, the team hosted the third Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting. The plan was released for public review on January 28, 2026, and comments were accepted through February 27, 2026. Comments were consolidated and considered in the final ATP. The ATP and project website can be accessed here: https://letsmodo.org/planningsafe-streets/scatp-2/ The plan results in a prioritized network of bike and pedestrian facilities in the City. These include new separated multiuse paths, protected bike lanes, sidewalks, crossing improvements, and low traffic neighborhood connectors. In Santa Cruz today, an estimated 34% of all daily trips are taken by people walking and biking. Not only does this exceed the 2030 goal in the Climate Action Plan, but it shows that we already have an extensive number of people who will benefit from improved infrastructure and programs. Implementing the programs, policies, and projects in the ATP will grow this number and ensure a safe, connected network for people of all ages and abilities.

The vision for Santa Cruz is a place where people of all ages and physical abilities can access safe, convenient, and enjoyable ways of getting around. When we talk about “all ages and abilities”, we are talking about types of infrastructure that research shows that supports everyone from youth to seniors not only being able to use, but being comfortable and likely to use.

Implementing this type of infrastructure makes the City of Santa Cruz more:

18.2  Child friendly - a place where kids can walk and bike to school, the park, a friend’s house, and around their neighborhoods.
 Senior friendly - a place where people can age in their communities and still be able to access their community without a car.
 Mobility inclusive– a place where people of all abilities can move around whether they use a mobility device, have a guide dog, need a stroller, or a walker.

A major difference of this plan is that it is centered on making mobility and transportation accessible for everyone, not just for those who are already confident bikers and walkers.

This is not a plan that will sit on a shelf when adopted. This is a plan that is intended to be a blueprint pursuing funding to implement projects, a plan to guide policy development brought to Council, and a plan to inform the programs that we build and fund to support people being able to walk, bike, and roll in our community. The 2017 Active Transportation Plan was leveraged to secure over $56 million in outside funding to implement the listed projects. The 2026 Active Transportation Plan will be used in the same way- to guide our planned active transportation network and make our local dollars go further.

TPWC received a final update on the Active Transportation Plan at the February 23, 2026 meeting. After the February 23, 2026 meeting, the Transportation and Public Works Commission recommended that City Council approve the Active Transportation Plan with the addition of a project to add rail trail crossings at Almar, Swift, and California, to review and consider for addition the public comments received, and to consider a different naming convention for Neighborhood Greenways. These changes have been incorporated into the final document presented today.

The Active Transportation Plan can be accessed on the project website here:
https://letsmodo.org/planning-safe-streets/scatp-2/
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: The proposed Council action is statutorily exempt from CEQA under Public Resources Code § 21080.20, which contains a specific exemption for active transportations plans. A notice of exemption will be filed with the California Office of Planning and Research and Santa Cruz County.

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): This project promotes the following Health in All Policies Conditions: Health and Wellness and Healthy Environments by improving active transportation (biking and walking) conditions in the city. By encouraging active transportation, people may increase their physical activity and wellness and reduce negative environmental impacts of automobile use like greenhouse gas emissions, or noise.

FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: No

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: Funds are available in the Active Transportation Plan Update project (c402408) to complete this plan. This project is funded by Caltrans at a rate of

88.53%, with a required 11.47% local match. The local match is funded by direct staff time.

There is no impact to the General Fund.

18.3 Prepared By:

Claire Gallogly
Principal Transportation
Planner
Submitted By:

Nathan Nguyen, P.E.

Director of Public Works
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. RESOLUTION.DOCX

2. PUBLIC COMMENT RESPONSE LOG.PDF

3. CEQA NOTICE OF EXEMPTION.PDF

18.4 RESOLUTION NO. NS-XX,XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ APPROVING

AND ADOPTING THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

PLAN UPDATE
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Cruz General Plan 2030 supports a citywide system of safe, inviting, and accessible pedestrian ways and bikeways and the Climate Action Plan calls for increasing the number of people walking and biking to 30% of all trips by 2035; and WHEREAS, on April 11, 2023, the City Council authorized staff to apply for funds to update the City’s Active Transportation Plan, which was completed in 2017; and WHEREAS, the Active Transportation Plan Update is consistent with the General Plan since the General Plan calls for the implementation of a network of non-motorized transportation facilities to enhance multi-modal transportation options; and WHEREAS, an Active Transportation Plan Update has been prepared consistent with the State’s Active Transportation Program Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the 2026 update included an existing conditions assessment, three phases of public outreach and engagement, three Technical Advisory Committee meetings, an evaluation of active transportation needs, and development of the project list and prioritization framework; and WHEREAS, the updated Active Transportation Plan is a planning-level document that will guide future actions by the City Council, and as such it does not authorize any projects, nor does it commit funding to any project or activity contained in the Plan. Each future project and activity will be subject to its own environmental review. This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code § 21080.20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz as follows: that the City Council approves and adopts the 2026 update to the City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of April, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

18.5 RESOLUTION NO. NS-XX,XXX
APPROVED: ______________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

18.6 # PUBLIC COMMENT RESPONSE
1 Maybe this is already part of the plan and I overlooked it, but after the event I found myself thinking that I would like to see planning changes across the board aimed at reducing car speeds, not only in the high-priority corridors identified in the ATP. So if road repairs or upgrades are to be made whatever the reason, it would be ideal if narrower travel lanes, wider sidewalks, raised crossings, sidewalk extensions, etc were part of the design standard.

I’d also like to ask: what’s being done to control costs? Lowering costs seems critical in light of both political and fiscal realities.

Streets identified as Neighborhood Streets in the plan are recommended for traffic calming treatments. City staff also work to narrow travel lanes in all repaving projects, which helps to reduce speeds.

Costs are always a challenge to implementation, and inflation has led to dramatic cost increases in the last few years. City staff prioritize projects that can be funded through grants and look for opportunities to reduce costs, like implementing ATP recommendations during regular road maintenance.
2 I am excited that the city and county are making improvements to ensure the safety of cyclists on the road, but I want to caution you that part of bike safety is the road surface. Recently the county "improved" the bike lane separation along Soquel Dr. between State Park Drive and La Fonda. As part of this work they resurfaced the road way to improve its durability. The result was degradation of the bike lane surface in numerous spots where the work trucks impacted the surface during the operation. The result is cracking, buckling and washboard where there was previously none. The worst is between the Hwy 1 N on-ramp and La Fonda if you are curious. It is especially dangerous at night.

The standard for pavement should be held to qualities we see on Water street between Branciforte and Ocean, Laguna/Delaware Ave from Bay Ave to Swift St. and River St between Water and Hwy 1.

We appreciate the efforts to keeping us safe. If there is any way I can help, let me know. As I ride 150-200+ miles a week in the county, I see a lot of the issues. I submit hazard reports, but I am not sure if they are ever addressed.

The approach the City has used on Water, Branciforte, Bay, and other streets is the intended approach for future separated bike facilities. The City continues to prioritize pavement improvements as part of complete streets implementation. 3 One thing I forgot to bring up as a bike project is installation of rubber flangeway gap fillers in areas where cyclists encounter train tracks at a less than ideal angle. Chestnut/Lincoln, Chestnut/Walnut, most of Beach St, etc.

Humboldt County recently used ones on their Humboldt Bay Trail that are flush with the pavement surface. It'd help reduce tripping hazard for pedestrians as well.

Plan does not identify individual crossing improvements, but rather a menu of treatment options. Staff will consider flangeways fillers and other methods to insure a flush crossing of railroad facilities.
4 Here's some further feedback, now that I've had a chance to gather my thoughts. Let me know if I should register my feedback some other way.

More prominent/accessible cycling connections to the levee. Currently, the most prominent connection on the downtown side at the dragon gate is behind the TJ's parking lot on a one way street. Other connections are in neglected and/or car-infested spots (I'm thinking of Riverfront plaza by Petsmart, and Laurel Street extension behind the tire shop by KP arena). Even the connections at Laurel, Soquel, and Water are pretty low-key.

Fully pedestrianise some or all of the Pacific Garden Mall.

Prioritize pedestrians at signalized intersections wherever possible by automatically showing a 'walk' signal, without pressing the "beg" button. Consider extending minimum traffic signal intervals where feasible, to allow pedestrians to cross without pressing a button.

Make the whole thing cheaper and faster! :-) Seriously, though, it's painful to note how many high-priority, highimpact parts of the plan are in the Medium (5-10 year) time frame. And some of the price tags are pretty eyewatering... which I expect makes them both fiscally and politically more challenging.

Most of all, THANK YOU for the thoughtful plan and presentation, and for the opportunity to review and comment on it.

Policy added to explore methods to increase accessible connections to Riverwalk as city sponsored projects.

The idea of a pedestrianized Pacific Ave has been discussed for many years. It is not included in the ATP because it is more than a transportation project - successful street closures require activation in order to be successful. If this project were to be considered in the future, it would likely be led by the City's Economic Development Department rather than Public Works.

Staff will evaluate automatic walk signal at signalized intersections.

Costs are always a challenge to implementation, and inflation has led to dramatic cost increases in the last few years. City staff prioritize projects that can be funded through grants and look for opportunities to reduce costs, like implementing ATP recommendations during regular road maintenance.
5A
(Part 1) I’ve had a chance to review the updated Active Transportation Plan and wanted to share some feedback from the perspective of a daily cyclist and a parent raising young riders in Santa Cruz. I appreciate the tremendous amount of work that went into the plan and the City’s continued commitment to expanding active transportation options.

Santa Cruz has so many natural advantages for biking and walking. Much of the city—especially on the Westside—benefits from a connected grid layout, relatively short travel distances, and mild weather year-round.

These qualities make our community an ideal place to prioritize cycling, walking, and transit. That potential is one of the things I love most about living here.

At the same time, I remain very concerned about safety. For a city of our size, Santa Cruz continues to experience an unusually high number of serious and fatal crashes. Any plan to increase active transportation use needs to directly confront this reality with stronger education, enforcement, and infrastructure changes.

Over the past several years I’ve noticed a dramatic rise in distracted driving—people on cell phones at stop signs, at intersections, and even while moving through traffic. This behavior cuts across all age groups and creates constant danger for cyclists and pedestrians. I believe the City needs a much more visible and proactive approach that includes public education campaigns and targeted police enforcement to make it clear that distracted driving is unacceptable, illegal and punishable.

I’ve also experienced, with increasing frequency, drivers failing to pass cyclists safely. Even in clearly marked bike lanes with solid white lines, many drivers speed by without slowing down or providing the legally required three feet of space. When there are obstacles such as parked cars or trash cans that force a cyclist to move left within the lane, drivers often refuse to yield or adjust at all. This is especially common on California Street, Delaware, Bay, West Cliff Drive, and Woodrow.

In addition to the Active Transportation Plan, the City is working on a Safety Action Plan that will analyze collision data throughout the City and make recommendations to improve safety for people walking, biking, and driving. The Safety Action Plan will include a recommendation for an awareness campaign focused at all road users targeting distracted driving and reminders to pass cyclists safely.

18.7 5B
(Part 2) As someone teaching my children to ride independently, this behavior is one of the biggest barriers to feeling safe letting them bike around town along with reluctance by motor vehicles to stop for kids, bikes, pedestrian crossings - even at marked crosswalks.

Another area that deserves greater attention is e-bike use. I was surprised that the plan does not include clearer rules or expectations. Education for students and parents is a good start, but it is not sufficient on its own. As manufacturers continue to introduce increasingly powerful devices, it is the city’s responsibility to establish clear guidelines and best practices that define how residents can safely use personal mobility devices — from Class 2 and 3 e-bikes and mini-bikes to one-wheels — on public land. Thoughtful regulation can help minimize safety risks while maximizing the benefits these devices offer as viable active transportation options.

I strongly encourage the City to establish posted speed limits on the Rail Trail, Westcliff and other protected paths, along with clear signage outlining expectations for Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 e-bikes. Without clear structure and guidance, increased e-bike use is likely to create avoidable conflicts on shared facilities. At the same time, we should actively support their responsible growth, as they are a valuable tool for active transportation and for reducing reliance on single-occupancy vehicles as our community continues to grow and densify. Waiting for state or federal regulations — or failing to act proactively — would not reflect the leadership Santa Cruz should demonstrate, particularly given the high local adoption of these devices.

Many rules regarding e-bikes are set at the state level. Current legislation does not allow local jurisdictions to set speed limits on bicycle paths or multi-use trails.

Legislation was recently introduced (AB 2346) that would allow local jurisdictions to set those speed limits, and the Santa Cruz City Council voted to endorse that legislation at their February 24th meeting.
5C
(Part 3) Related to that, there is a growing problem with higher-powered e-bikes—particularly Class 2 and Class 3 models—being ridden in natural areas such as Wilder Ranch on single track paths. I’ve personally seen a noticeable increase in what are essentially small electric motorcycles traveling at high speed on single track trails meant for pedestrians, horses, and conventional bikes. This creates real safety and environmental concerns. The City and County should work together to improve trailhead signage, increase education about where different e-bike classes are allowed, and conduct periodic enforcement so these areas remain safe and enjoyable for everyone.

The condition and management of the West Cliff mixed-use path is another issue that needs attention. Sections of the concrete around Gharkey and Santa Cruz Streets and elsewhere are crumbling and uneven, and the usable surface does not extend fully to the guardrail. The path lacks consistent or attention grabbing clear “keep right / pass left” guidance for residents and tourists, which leads to constant conflicts between walkers, dogs on long leashes, and cyclists. If this is truly meant to be an effective multi-use corridor, it needs better maintenance, clearer markings, improved signage, and in some areas physical widening. If we can have signs about a poop fairy we can have signs about a short dog leash, remaining alert on the path for other users and giving wildlife 50m legal space.

Long term, I hope the City will reconsider dedicating a portion of West Cliff Drive to protected active transportation space. That kind of bold action would have enormous benefits for our geology, ecology, residents and visitors alike.

Wilder Ranch is outside of City of Santa Cruz jurisdiction, and is beyond the scope of this plan. Comments have been shared with State Parks.

There is a recommendation on pg 34 for an awareness campaign to develop norms and expectations for users of shared use paths within the City of Santa Cruz. Initial messaging focuses on e-bike users, but additional messages directed at dogwalkers etc. can be considered in the future.

Long-term plans for the West Cliff Drive path can be found in the 50-year Community Vision for West Cliff:
https://www.santacruzca.gov/files/assets/city/v/1/cmo/documents/climate/50- year-community-vision-for-west-cliff-with-appendices-2024-05-07.pdf 5D
(Part 4) Finally, I want to highlight an issue that often gets overlooked: improperly parked cars. On the Westside in particular, vehicles are routinely parked right up to corners and crosswalks, blocking sightlines and forcing cyclists to merge into traffic unexpectedly. California’s daylighting laws exist to prevent exactly this kind of hazard, yet they seem to be rarely enforced in Santa Cruz unless someone files a complaint. More proactive parking enforcement, curb markings, and public education—especially in tourist-heavy areas—would make an immediate difference. The current lack of enforcement directly undermines the safety goals of the Active Transportation Plan.

I share all of this because I genuinely want Santa Cruz to succeed. We have the climate, the culture, and the geography to be a national leader in active transportation, but getting there will require stronger action around driver behavior, clearer e-bike policies, better maintained infrastructure, a willingness to make bold policy changes, and more consistent enforcement.

Thank you for your openness to community input and for the hard work you do on behalf of our city. I’d be happy to discuss any of this further if it would be helpful.

City staff are currently working to daylight 88 intersections with red curb, bollards, and curb extensions and will continue to seek funding for daylighting treatments.

The City accepts requests for daylighting and will continue to implement citywide.

Parking enforcement will respond to requests for specific enforcement areas where parking in the daylighting zone is an issue.
6A
(Part 1) Congratulations on a sharp looking, methodologically solid planning tool. And thanks for the opportunity to serve on the technical advisory committee to provide support and input. Here are my comments on the plan.

1. Figure 20. Recommended and Existing Network: I suggest extending the Neighborhood Greenway on Modesto Avenue eastward, across Swift Street along Wanzer Street to Fair Avenue. This is a common walking and cycling route in the lower westside and would connect the Greenway to two rather than just one, north-south arterials that connect Mission Street to West Cliff Drive.

2. Figure 21. Recommended Sidewalk Projects: Would suggest identifying Delaware Avenue to be included for sidewalk improvements west of Swift Street on the south side of the street. This high-speed vehicle corridor is planned for significant new housing, including the city school’s employee housing project and ongoing development of the old Santa Cruz Lumber site (Venus Spirits). This corridor is being planned for active transportation improvements to link west to the UCSC coastal science campus. It needs a robust pedestrian design to safely handle the heavy and increasing use. There are several gaps in the continuity of the sidewalk on the south side of the arterial, including right at the corner where Berdel’s outlet store and a surfboard shaping workshop operate.

The Neighborhood Greenway on Modesto Ave has been extended to Wanzer Ave between Swift St and Fair Ave.

Sidewalk will be constructed on Delaware Ave between Shaffer Rd and Swanton Blvd as part of the funded multi-use path project. Sidewalk on Delaware between Swanton Blvd and Swift St has been added to the project list to ensure that arterial streets have sidewalk on at least one side of the street, per the policy outlined in the ATP.

18.8 6B
(Part 2) 3. Table 6. Policies - Bike Parking category
I recommend enhancing bike parking policies as follows:

Retrofit city parks and public spaces with current-practice inverted U bike parking infrastructure. The West Cliff Drive linear multipurpose trail and beach access points have no bike parking west of the Lighthouse, despite being one of the most popular recreational destinations in the city. Derby Park tennis/pickleball courts have inadequate and outdated bike parking racks, despite being a major cycling end-user destination.

I recommend adding a policy that requires special events of a certain type and scale to provide bike valet services.

4. Figure 25. Prioritized bike projects: I recommend extending the Modesto Ave Greenway eastward across Swift onto Wanzer to its terminus at Fair Avenue (see number 1 above).

5. Table 10: I recommend adding a category to ‘Provide Education and Encouragement’ related to bike valet services. Monitor and record the use of valet services over time, creating a snapshot of carbon reduction benefits, bike miles travelled, and use of valet sites as education dissemination locations.

The City's adopted Standard Detail for bike parking is an inverted U. As bike racks are replaced, they will be replaced or added in this style. City staff continues to seek funding to add bike parking at high-use public facilities. In 2026, new inverted U bike parking will be added at the Lighthouse, Harvey West Pool, and the Wharf.

Seprate from the ATP, valet bike parking is being considered as a requirement of the City's Special Event Permit. Tracking of metrics related to valet bike parking would take place through the City's Special Event Permit.
7A
(Part 1) We are profoundly concerned with omissions from the Draft Active Transportation Plan. We are looking forward to inclusion of these missing issues/projects as changes are made before the final document is written.

Pedestrian project/improvements are severely underrepresented in the document. We are very happy for the inclusion of 74 bicycle projects in the report. In contrast there are only one third the number of pedestrian projects (23), and the pedestrian projects are very limited in scope and deal only with missing sidewalk segments "along park frontages and within .25 miles of equity destinations/schools . . . ." It appears that the dearth of pedestrian projects is related to the equity-destination proximity requirement. We did not note any such requirement for bicycle projects.

There are no construction projects listed to increase the safety of pedestrian crossings. Examples of such projects include elimination of free right turns such as at Ocean & Water where pedestrians are forced to stand in tiny islands with vehicles rushing by them on all sides including from behind. The example given is not a complete list of sites where safer crossing designs are needed.

Analyzing each intersection in order to identify crossing improvements at specific intersections was beyond the scope of this plan. Instead, the Plan includes guidance on appropriate intersection design treatments based on the number of lanes, posted speed limit, and daily traffic volume on a given street. 7B
(Part 2) No mention is made of completing sidewalks on arterial streets or other dangerous spots despite the finding that arterial roads felt unsafe for all users. For example, a project is listed for completing missing sidewalk segments on Almar (an arterial street) between Delaware and West Cliff. There are missing sidewalk segments on Almar between Mission Street and Delaware which force pedestrians to walk in the arterial street. Filling in these gaps was a high priority project for the previous ATP. It is baffling that this high priority safety project is omitted from the
current revision. Other dangerous sidewalk gaps that expose high numbers of pedestrians to danger include Alta Vista Drive, Delaware Avenue between Swift and Surfside and between Woodrow and Columbia, Spring Street leading to the Pogonip (Park) between High Street and the park (no continuous sidewalk), Escalona between Walnut Avenue and Bay, parts of Highland Avenue, and the short, no visibility section at the top of Bayona hill. The named examples are not an exhaustive list of priority sidewalk gaps.

No discussion/project list is noted for intersections with excessive curb radii. Examples include major intersections such as Soquel & Ocean and almost all the intersections with Nobel Drive. The residential areas such as Nobel Drive could be made safer by the simple installation of bollards such as were used to mitigate speeding through neighborhoods off Woodrow when West Cliff Drive was under construction and closed to through traffic.

Major intersections such as Soquel & Ocean would need to be listed as a project and would require serious construction
and redesign. The examples named are not a comprehensive list of excessive curb radii needing remedy.

The Active Transportation Plan has a 10-year planning horizon, which requires prioritizing between the many sidewalk needs in our city. The methodology developed for prioritizing sidewalks identified segments along park frontages or within 1/4 mile of equity destinations and schools. Additional sidewalk segments will be prioritized as funding allows.

Missing sidewalk segements on arterial streets were reviewed for inclusion in the ATP. Most of the few remaining sidewalk gaps on arterial streets are high-cost projects that are beyond the scope of this 10-year plan. Almar Ave is defined as a collector street according to Caltrans roadway classifications, and sidewalk is present on at least one side of the street between Mission and Delaware per the proposed standard.

Reduced curb radii has been added to the menu of pedestrian crossing options on page 30 of the plan.
7C
(Part 3) Choice of wording does not indicate a strong commitment to pedestrian safety. For example "strive [emphasis added] to decrease level of stress . . . " This quote is under Policies in the Projects/Programs section under Pedestrian Crossings. A new ATP policy should do more than "strive."  A specific action should be called out that is a proven countermeasure that reduces stress for pedestrians. Such measures should be identified and listed as projects for existing intersections and not have to wait for another reason to "upgrade" the intersection.

For example, elimination of free right turns (slip lanes) that create unnecessary exposure of pedestrians to vehicle traffic on all sides as they wait for the walk signal. Other examples of waffle wording include: Quote: "In locations with high pedestrian volumes and few right turns on red, post No Right Turn . . ." Comment: There are many locations with latent high pedestrian volumes where the volume is suppressed because of car-centric street design. Better wording might be "in business districts/school routes/near parks and playgrounds. . . ."
Language in Table 6: Recommended Policies on page 31: "Use the guidelines in this Plan, including the toolkit, to reduce the level of traffic stress at all new and upgraded crossings."
Analyzing each intersection in order to identify crossing improvements at specific locations was beyond the scope of this plan. Instead, the Plan includes guidance on appropriate intersection design treatments based on the number of lanes, posted speed limit, and daily traffic volume on a given street.

Re: No Right on Red: the overarching policy is to "Prohibit Right Turn on Red at signalized intersections." Each intersection will require study, and nearby pedestrian destinations such as schools, parks, and business districts will be taken into account.
7D
(Part 4) We did not see any traffic calming measures listed as projects to reduce speeding. Many such projects are low cost such as the creation of median islands and/or reduction of curb radii with bollards or bulbouts and would make walking safer on busy collector and neighborhood streets.

Although the intersection of Highways 1 and 9 and Mission Street/Hwy 1 are controlled by Caltrans, we believe they should be mentioned since they are the source of many of the fatalities which occur in the city. Perhaps recommending stronger collaboration or communication between the city and Caltrans is warranted. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this important draft document. We invite the consultants and City Council Members to stand on the tiny traffic islands at Ocean & Water and experience the stress of crossing intersections like this. Now imagine crossing there using a walker, after your 70th birthday, or holding the hand of a three-year-old.

Traffic calming measures are part of Neighborhood Route toolkit. On streets planned for Neighborhood Routes, it is anticipated that traffic calming will be included.

Highway 1/9: Policy has been added to "Work with Caltrans to prioritize improvements to and around the 1/9 intersection that improve safety for people walking and biking."

18.9 8A
(Part 1) The ATP’s project prioritization reflects a very narrow approach with its emphasis of eliminating bike lanes in favor of separated or offroad bikeways. Given these factors, the principles enunciated can be achieved, in addition to the Implementation measures already included in the draft ATP, by:
- Changing the recommended criteria for new and modified bicycle facilities on page 31 from must be low-stress level 1 or 2 to should lower the current stress level aiming for level 1 or 2. - Not exclusively mandating separated bikeways on or multi-use pathways adjacent to arterials or collectors (p. 31), but rather favoring location-specific improvements and facilities that lessen stress. - Deferring any additional two-way bikeways substituting for existing bike lanes until those slated for Delaware Ave. and Bay St. can be evaluated.
- Prioritizing closing gaps in the bikeway system on arterial and collector streets.

The City seeks to reduce stress on all new or modified bike facilities to LTS 1 or 2 in order to achieve the goals of this plan. Language on pg 24 outlines bike facility selection criteria. Trade-offs will be considered in the design of specific facilities.

Professional guidance is used to determine whether a 1-way or 2-way bikeway is appropriate. This is informed by roadway context, desired locations, available right of way, presence of parking, and other factors.
8B
(Part 2) - Identifying one or two difficult, expensive connecting projects for pursuing grant funding. (While completing as many projects or components as rapidly as possible relies on economical designs, some worthy projects are going to be complex and expensive, namely those that require work, such as land acquisition, grading, retaining walls, etc. outside of the current roadway.)
- Segmenting lengthier projects on the list into more site-specific components, offering alternative designs, identifying timeframes for each component and alternative. [Note: assuming this exercise goes beyond the scope of the grant for preparing this ATP, then include in the ATP Implementation section a commitment to such a process and offer a few examples, such as how improvements for Soquel Ave. could be segmented and staged.] Although the City has performed admirably in expanding and improving bicycle facilities over the years, there remain an overwhelming number of projects still needed to complete a stress-free network. The comments in this letter and my list of specific recommended revisions and additions are intended to help you craft a final ATP that can lead to fulfilling this vision.

The City of Santa Cruz will select a subset of projects to seek outside grant funding to implement. Projects are selected based on competitiveness for various funding sources. Analyzing each project to identify those most competitive for funding is outside the scope of this plan.

Segmentation of larger projects is likely for project delivery. Designs and timeframes of individual projects is outside the scope of this plan and will be done in the future on a project-by-project basis.
8C
(Part 3) 1. Specific Recommended Revisions and Additions [shown as underlined] to the February 2026 Draft City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan Update and to the Implementation Action Plan p. 12: “The comfort of bicycle facilities can vary widely depending on their context, condition, and level of separation from vehicular traffic and parking…”

2. p. 12: “Designing and maintaining bike facilities that are comfortable…” [the best designed facility will be uncomfortable to ride in and avoided if the pavement becomes uneven, debris collects, etc.]

3. p. 24 Figure 17: “Most separation from cars moving parallel to cyclists; least separation from cars moving parallel to cyclists;”

4. p. 24: “As posted speed limits and motor vehicle volumes increase, bikeways must offer greater separation from traffic to provide low-stress conditions. However, existing speed and speed limits should not be taken as a given – speed reduction efforts should first be explored because there will be increased safety and less expense needed for the bike facility. The separation differences between different bicycle facility types are described in Figure 17. However, separation from parallel motorists alone is not a guarantee of low stress. Other factors include intersecting traffic, width of bikeway, presence and volume of on-coming bikes (on two-way paths), unresponsive or excessive traffic controls, pavement condition, presence of drainage grates, other obstructions, or debris.

1. Language updated

2. Language updated

3. Language not updated.

4. Language not updated. Staff looks for ways to reduce speed limits in all repaving projects. Bicycle level of traffic stress is defined on page 12. 8D
(Part 4) 1. The recommended bicycle facility for each corridor was informed by the FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide matrix shown in Figure 18. It is crucial that each facility type be adequately designed (e.g., follows California Highway Design Manual and MUTCD standards) and maintained. Additionally However, not every facility recommendation can or should strictly adhere to these guidelines and many tradeoffs must be considered when selecting the recommended facility…”
Policies and Programs:

2. p. 31 Bike Parking: “Update City code to add:
- in the case of a large residential or partial residential project with internal parking, bike rooms should be located as close as possible to residential entrances [e.g., stairs, elevators]; such bike rooms may exceed 16 spaces provided that where there are multiple such entrances, there should be multiple corresponding bike rooms. • Bike rooms should be located where there is optimal safe and convenient access from the streets and then onto residential entrances:
o access routes from neighboring and nearby streets should be analyzed to determine the best location to enter the building [this may differ from the motor vehicle entrance; i.e., from a side or rear less trafficked street, from a street where there is a bike lane, from an alley, from a bike path, e.g., the river levee]; o motor vehicle circulation into and through a parking garage should be analyzed to determine the safest path for bicycles to access a common bike room and its optimal location [following from the above, continuing a separate lane from a separate bike entrance to the bike room might be safer than comingling bikes and motor vehicles within a garage];
• Residents who park their bikes in common areas should be afforded access to any security video surveillance that may show the bike room.
• No restrictions should be placed on bikes in elevators, residences, or private residential spaces. [some residents may want to bring their bikes into their dwellings or onto their balconies for security, maintenance or admiration purposes].

1. Staff follows all applicable standards in the design of bike and pedestrian facilities.

2. Bike parking requirements are housed in municipal code and are not being updated through the Active Transportation Plan. Code language is updated periodically and comments will be considered at that time.

18.10 8E
(Part 5) 1. Allow private developers to pay a fee in lieu of providing required bike parking in constrained sites… “ [This recommended policy should be deleted because I can not think of any site that cannot accommodate bicycle parking, which can be indoor or outdoor. Possibly allow some in lieu fee for a small portion of the required parking if the amount exceeds 50 or more spaces and there is also a lot of bike parking on adjacent sites or the fee is used on adjacent sites or public walkways or plazas.]

2. p. 31: “Prohibit Right Turn on Red at signalized intersections with an exception for bicycles. In locations with high pedestrian volumes and few right turns on red, post No Right turn on Red signs (MUTCD R10-11a). At other locations, further study will be required to assess vehicle queuing and signal timing. Add stop signs and more visible crosswalks to free right turn lanes, do not add any more free right turn lanes in the city, and gradually convert free right turn lanes into 90 degree turns.”

1. Wording of bike parking policy changed to: Allow private developers to pay a fee in lieu of providing required Class II bike parking in constrained sites. Class I bike parking for employees or residents is not eligible for an in-lieu fee. In some cases the City can provide more useable bike parking in the public right-of-way than developers can provide on their site.

2. The 2026 CA MUTCD does allow the use of 'Except Bikes' sign with 'No Right on Red'. Staff will evaluate whether 'Except Bikes' signs can be added as 'No Right on Red' is implemented. Analyzing each intersection in order to identify crossing improvements at specific locations was beyond the scope of this plan. Instead, the Plan includes guidance on appropriate intersection design treatments based on the number of lanes, posted speed limit, and daily traffic volume on a given street. 8F
(Part 6) 1. p. 31 Crossings and Intersections: “Implement a nighttime “Rest in Red” policy. This means that traffic signals will automatically be red until a vehicle, including a bicycle, is detected. Assuming no cross-traffic is approaching, the light will then turn green. In the daytime, use traffic sensor or video data to adjust signal timing to better align green times with actual traffic flow. Adjust synchronized or other fixed time traffic signals so they don’t stay red for long periods of time when there is no more cross-traffic but there is approaching traffic. [I have experienced many instances waiting at red lights after there is no more oncoming traffic – e.g., at Water and River Streets and at Center and Mission Streets – which hinders bicycle travel and leads to driver impatience and hence a tendency to beat or disobey the signal or then speed up when the signal finally turns green and thus placing cyclists in danger]

2. Adequately sign locations where left turns are allowed in front of opposing through traffic that has a green light (e.g., northbound Pacific Ave. at Laurel St; northbound Front St. at Soquel Ave.); or adjust signal cycles to eliminate this from happening if there has been a crash history at that location. Where there are signalized left turn only lanes but not much opposing through traffic (e.g., left onto Water Street from southbound North Branciforte Ave.) allow resuming left turns after stopping while the opposing direction has a green light by using a flashing yellow left turn arrow and signing for ‘Left Turn Yield on Flashing Yellow Arrow’ or similar signaling and signing.” [at this intersection I often have to wait through an entire signal cycle to turn left if the left arrow has turned red and there is no opposing traffic, but there remains a long green time for the through or opposing left turning traffic.]

1. "Including a bicycle" language added. Signal timing at individual intersections is beyond the scope of this plan. Comments will be shared with engineering staff for review.

2. Signage and signal timing at individual intersections is beyond the scope of this plan. Comments will be shared with engineering staff for review. 8G
(Part 7) 1.p. 32 Maintenance: “Continue operating, utilizing, and improving the City’s and RTC’s road hazard reporting systems. Promptly respond to those reports that can be quickly addressed in the normal course of business, such as pothole filling and debris clearing. If more longer-term fixes are not already encompassed in this ATP or other public works program, add them to future project list updates. Keep reporters of hazards apprised of their disposition. Prioritize pavement rehabilitation and maintenance projects that (a) implement ATP projects, (b) add Complete Streets Elements, or (c) add missing sidewalk and ramps to the network.”

2. p. 32 Riverwalk: “... those connections shall be upgraded to publicly access, active modes connections (including for bicycles, including the one proposed just north of the planned Cruz Hotel) that utilize best practices in environmental design and accessibility. Stripe pathway through the Royal Taj India Cuisine parking lot in order to leave a clear pathway for bikes and pedestrians. Install bicycle routing signs to and from nearby streets to connect to the Riverwalk. Allow bicyclists 24-hour access to the Riverwalk. Allow bicycle riding on the San Lorenzo River bridge that connects San Lorenzo Park to River Street. Add signs, bollards, and other devices at the end of County Building driveways to prevent drivers from entering the San Lorenzo Riverwalk.”

3. p. 34: “… develop norms and expectations across the various groups who use these [multiuse path] facilities, especially e-bike users.”

4. Add: “Develop, support, and encourage participation in give-away and discount programs for bikes and accessories.”

1. This comment reflects the City's current practices.

2. Policy added to explore methods to increase accessible connections to Riverwalk as city sponsored projects. Bicyclists are allowed to use the Riverwalk 24-hours per day, though some access ramps are on private property and may have restrictions on access.

3. Awareness campaign will target various user groups, including people on e-bikes.

4. The GO Santa Cruz Downtown and GO Santa Cruz County programs currently provide incentives and rebates for free or discounted bikes and bike accessories, including helmets and lights.
8H
(Part 8) 1. Add: “When adding or restriping bike lanes and room or funding is unavailable for buffering, install 6” wide separation stripes.”

2. Add: “Once a street segment has a bike lane, it shall not be removed. Maintain bicycle access on existing streets by not altering roadway configurations in manners that would impede bicycle travel, such as not adding on-street parking where it does not exist unless there is room to add a bicycle lane too, and it is added along with the parking; not installing diagonal parking; not changing two-way streets to one-way travel unless contraflow bicycle lanes are included; allowing for through bicycle travel if a roadway is closed to through traffic. Maintain current bike lanes and paths by not reducing their width; not removing them; not closing them; not restricting their hours of use; not allowing parking within them; and not obstructing them.”

3. Add: “Separated bikeways can be designed with various barriers ranging from widely spaced to solid, low to high, narrow to wide. While a more solid, higher, or wider separation may elicit a safer feeling for some, it constrains bicyclists from maneuvering out of the bikeway if the need arises. In selecting the design to use, the default should be one that allows ample escape opportunities for the cyclist. Also, in this regard and to allow awareness of any erratic or turning motor vehicles, the separation should not obstruct the cyclist’s view of the travel lane.”

4. Add: “Install traffic calming devices in a manner that does not interfere with bicycle travel (e.g., don’t install bulb outs that intrude into a bicyclist’s pathway, either shorten them or employ a substitute traffic calming measure).”

1. Striping will be installed in accordance with current MUTCD standards

2. Plan includes policy to allow 2-way bike travel on one-way streets. Additional policy suggestions do not provide flexibility to account for all future scenarios on public roadways. In general staff does not remove bike lanes or add additional onstreet parking.

3. Design details for separated bike lanes, including barrier types, are included in the Active Transportation Toolkit, which is an appendix to this plan. Barrier designs will be determined on a project by project basis with consideration of roadway and land use context.

4. Active Transportation Toolkit updated to clarify that curb extensions shall not be installed in locations where they will interfere with bike lanes.

18.11 8I
(Part 9) 1. Add: “Ensure that there is a passable detour for bicyclists and pedestrians through any construction site on or that disrupts a bikeway or portion of the roadway a cyclist would typically ride on or a sidewalk; also ensure that construction measures, such as signs, are not placed in such locations. Follow the CA MUTCD 2026, especially Part 9 Traffic Control for Bicycle Facilities, and the Traffic Safety Coalition’s ‘Recommended Guidelines to Protect the Safety of Bicyclists and Pedestrians, Including Those with Disabilities During Road Construction, Maintenance or Encroachment,” actively monitor roadway work, and promptly respond to any complaints.”

2. Add: “Install a bike lane stripe or at least a dashed stripe delineating where bicyclists travel through intersections, with priority implementation to those intersections that do not line up directly (e.g., Soquel Ave. at Frederick St., Trevathan onto westbound Soquel Ave, southbound Front at Soquel, eastbound Laurel St. at Pacific Ave.); or where there are opposing left turn signals operating coincidentally (e.g., Water St. onto Ocean St. at certain times).”

3. Add: “Better mark or where possible remove drainage grates in the path of bicyclists’ turning movements (e.g., from Soquel Ave. westbound onto Doyle St.)”

4. Add: “Install signing and pavement marking for bicycle travel where it is allowed but motor vehicles are not (e.g., across Beach Street from Cliff Street; at east end of Broadway indicating bicyclists can proceed straight through to Arana Gulch trail).”

1. This plan does not include traffic control guidelines for construction projects.

2. Policy added to include bike lane striping through intersections on arterial roadways

3. Drainage grates have been retrofitted with bike-friendly design.

4. Individual signage and striping projects are beyond the scope of this plan.

Comments have been shared with City staff to review for potential implementation. 8J
(Part 10) 1. Add: “Evaluate traffic speeds and any collisions or near misses on Laurel Street, especially from California Ave. to Chestnut St., one year after the current round of improvements are completed to determine if additional or revised traffic calming measures or bicycle or pedestrian facilities are still needed.” [based on public concerns that the currently approved plan either will not be sufficient or will have unintended adverse consequences]

2. Add: “Evaluate bus timing and crashes on Front St. one year after the combined bus/bike lane is installed, and return to a bike only lane if bus travel efficiency hasn’t improved or crashes have increased.”

3. Add: “Ensure bicyclists can ride on Downtown alleyways, such as Pearl Alley.”

4. Add: “Install signs sufficiently ahead of intersections where the travel lanes expand into turn lanes warning of this change (e.g., northbound Pacific Ave. toward Laurel St. splitting into one lane for left turns, the other for both straightthrough traffic and right turns).” [often at such intersections queued vehicles obscure the pavement lane direction markings and the warning signs are not placed far enough in advance. This and the following two recommendations are not exclusive bicycle programs or policies but will lead to safer and more convenient cycling].

5. Add: “Add or improve signing, pavement marking, speed bumps or other traffic calming measures to somewhat curving routes without stop signs and with restrictive vision (e.g., Curtis St. and Coulson Ave., east end of Button St.)”

6. Add: “Install more frequent speed limit signs where there are several intersections or actual speeds are higher than the limits.”

1. The City of Santa Cruz consistently evaluates roadway safety. Project specific evaluation is beyond the scope of this plan.

2. The City of Santa Cruz consistently evaluates roadway safety. Project specific evaluation is beyond the scope of this plan.

3. Bicyclists may currently ride on Downtown alleyways.

4. Staff follows MUTCD guidelines regarding installation of signs and pavement markings.

5. CA AB 413 prohibits parking within 20' of an intersection to improve visibility. The City is working to stripe red curb at intersections throughout the City and stripes red curb in response to requests or safety concerns.

6. Individual signage and striping projects are beyond the scope of this plan. 8K
(Part 11) Implementation Action Plan
Reclassify as high priority the noted portions of the following projects:
#14 King Street: Bay St. to Kirby St.
#22 Delaware Avenue: Woodrow to Columbia
#35 Pacific Avenue: Laurel St to Front St. [this segment needs bike lanes and there is room for bike lanes, it has Downtown traffic and businesses, it is not a neighborhood greenway] #46 Ocean Street: Soquel Ave. to Barson St.
#51 Market Street (misidentified as Branciforte Drive): Avalon St. to Goss Ave. #56 Seabright Ave: Soquel Ave. to Pine St.
#57 Soquel Avenue westbound: No. Branciforte Ave. to Ocean St. #63 Frederick Street: Soquel Ave. to Broadway
[These are major portions of arterial and collector streets without bike lanes and have been slated for bike lanes for decades.]
Project prioritization was data-driven and based on scoring criteria which were shaped by public engagement and the Technical Advisory Committee.

18.12 8L
(Part 12) How:

Add the following as recommended bicycle facilities:

1. “Add bike lanes on Graham Hill to City limits, with priority to an uphill bike lane or as wide as shoulder as possible, short term extend the northbound bike lane past the intersection with Ocean St Extension. Southbound on this downhill curve add signing, add pavement markings (such as sharrows), and modify traffic islands and travel lanes to help prevent motor vehicle/bike conflicts.”

2. “Improve connecting Grant St. and Felker St. Mid-term modify some roadway and island configurations (such as relocating the traffic light island that is right in the path of westbound cyclists across Ocean St., adding raised crossings). Long term add a bridge over or tunnel under Highway 17.” [The recent restriping through these intersections improved the situation for cyclists, but did not adequately reduce the potential for conflicts, especially for cyclists attempting to turn left on Felker St. or right from Felker St onto Ocean St.]

3. “Install bike lanes on Third Street between Beach St. and Uhden St.”

4. “Complete the rail trail from Natural Bridges Dr. to Shaffer Rd.”

5. “Add bike route through parking lot of former gym connecting Water Street with Branciforte Creek pathway.”

6. “Install a pathway connection between pathway on east side of the Harbor and the future rail trail and Murray Street.”

7. “Install a pathway connection between pathway on west side of the Harbor and the future rail trail and Eaton Street.”

8. “Ensure that the Paseo extension of Maple Street between Pacific Ave and Front St is multi-use, i.e., bicyclists can ride on it.”

1. Constrained space, retaining wall required. Low benefit to cost ratio.

2. Design of individual intersections is beyond the scope of this plan

3. High volumes of visitor traffic on Third Street and good alternative route on Santa Cruz Riverwalk.

4. Project is beyond the scope of this 10-year plan.

5. Private property. Policy added to Explore methods to increase accessible connections to Riverwalk as city-sponsored projects
6&7. City will continue communication with SCCRTC and port district to pursue connections between the rail trail and the Santa Cruz Harbor.

8. Paseo is already in construction.
8M
(Part 13) 1. “Extend East Cliff Drive blufftop path from its western end to 4th Ave.”

2. “Build a Market St. to Lee St. bike path along the north side of Highway One.”

3. “Improve East Cliff Drive blufftop path from intersection with Seabright Ave. to 3rd Ave. to be more ridable by bicyclists. (option for intersection with Seabright Ave to 1st: allow contraflow (westbound) bicycle use of one-way East Cliff Dr.”

4. “Improve sidewalk between East Cliff Dr./Murray St. intersection and entrance to ramp from East Cliff Dr. to rail trail to better facilitate bicyclist usage (e.g., adjust guardrail positioning).”

5. “Install contraflow bike lane on northbound Riverside Ave. from Beach St. to 3rd St. (or option for a similar contraflow route from the main Boardwalk entrance to 3rd St., such as through the Boardwalk parking lot or on Raymond St).”

6. “Install a formal railroad track crossing from the rail trail to the pathway to Depot Park.”

7. “Install a left turn bike lane only at end of northernmost Harbor driveway onto Lake St. [this allows northbound cyclists to turn onto the pathway because currently there is only a right turn exit lane] and Install a curb cut to Murray St. at the southeast end of the bridge over the Harbor” [this allows northbound cyclists on the harbor pathway to access Murray St. and not have to ride on the sidewalk]

8. “Install a southbound bike lane on River St South when transit center moves out.”

9. “Install a separated bike lane through the eastbound Harvey West intersection with Sylvania” [this will allow cyclists not having to stop riding downhill; this is a T-intersection so there is no crossing traffic and there is no sidewalk on that side of Harvey West Blvd; there are marked crosswalks so cyclists would still be required to stop for pedestrians]
[the above all add connectivity to bicycle routes]

1. Project is environmentally complex and cost prohibitive, and is beyond the scope of this 10-year plan.

2. Project is on Caltrans ROW and is beyond the scope of this 10-year plan.

Comment has been shared with Caltrans.

3. Path is too narrow for bicycle use and is cost prohibitive to widen.

4. Improved access to rail trail will be addressed in Segments 8/9 of Coastal Rail Trail

5. High volumes of visitor traffic and constrained right-of-way create safety concerns with a contraflow design

6. Project requires CPUC approval and is beyond the scope of this 10-year plan

7. This location is private property and outside of City jurisdiction. Safety concerns about left turns onto Murray from Harbor parking lot.

8. Staff will evaluate when transit center relocates.

9. Design of individual intersections is beyond the scope of this plan 8N

1. (Part 14) “Install an ‘except for bicyclists’ sign under the ‘Do Not Enter Sign’ on Reed Way at Concepcion Way to allow bicyclists to travel northbound on Reed Way.”

2. “Improve connection at north end of Harbor Drive to Arana Gulch trail.”

3. “Convert Stop to Yield signs on the rail trail where it crosses streets mid-block.”

4. “Connect northbound Chestnut St. bike lane between Locust St. and Chestnut St. Extension.”

5. “Install bike lanes on Sylvania St.” [a busy access street to Costco and Harvey West Park ; in the current ATP; there is enough width for 11 foot wide travel lanes, bike lanes, and retained on-street parking; bike lanes would help with traffic calming as well]

6. “Ensure continued bicycle use of Spruce Street after it becomes a plaza, except possibly at times when there are actual events there that completely close the street. Consider a painted pathway or other method of delineating a strip of the pavement that would stay clear of physical objects and direct bikes where to ride so they won’t conflict with pedestrians and seating.”

7. “Allow bicycle riding on the High St bridge over Highway One.” [the above are additional simple, inexpensive measures to add connectivity to bicycle routes that could be placed into a very short-term implementation category]

1. Minor signage and striping changes are outside the scope of this plan. Comments have been shared with City staff to review for potential implementation.

2. Harbor Dr connector added

3. Minor signage and striping changes are outside the scope of this plan. Comments have been shared with City staff to review for potential implementation.

4. Minor signage and striping changes are outside the scope of this plan. Chestnut St to Chestnut St Ext is a left turning movement, cyclists should merge into lane

5. City considers bike improvements in all repaving projects. Sylvanie has low bike volumes and is not a high priority for bike lanes.

6. Design of Spruce Street Plaza was established in Downtown Expansion Plan.

Design of plaza is beyond the scope of this plan.

7. Bridge is not wide enough to allow shared use. Plan includes future project to reconstruct the bridge as multi-modal.

18.13 8O
(Part 15) “Widen downhill Water Street bike lane at Josefa Way, or if not possible install a speed hump or similar measure to slow motorists.”
“Eliminate blind corner at the top of bike path from Evergreen to High St.” [this might require moving the way, cutting back landscaping, slightly relocating the path]
“Install bike box eastbound San Lorenzo Blvd at Ocean St.” “Shorten traffic control arms at Wharf entrance so bicyclists can pass alongside them.” “Install bike path pavement markings across Shaffer Rd from Mission St. to Wilder path entrance; install signs on southbound Shaffer Rd ahead of crossing warning of bicycles and pedestrians (e.g., crosswalk ahead, speed limit signs, etc..”
“Install one way tiger teeth or equivalent measures at City limits end of Brookwood Dr. to further implement ‘Do Not Enter’ pavement markings and signing and actually prevent wrong way traffic.” “Install Bike Lane and End signs on westbound Soquel Ave. approaching to So. Branciforte Ave. intersection.” [an interim measure until the bike lane is continued across the intersection] “Remove parking space on Soquel Ave. adjacent to Staff of Life parking lot entrance” [current bike lane is substandard width at that location].
“Reconfigure the King Street at Miramar intersection and sidewalk bulb out to maintain northbound bike lane continuity; reconfigure traffic islands at Miramar at West Street to other traffic calming devices to maintain bike lane continuity.”
[the above correct deficiencies in the bikeway system or roadway system that accommodates bikes] Minor signage and striping changes are outside the scope of this plan. Comments have been shared with City staff to review for potential implementation. 8P
(Part 16) “Improve bicycle parking at Seabright Beach entrance across from Mott Ave. (State Parks)” “Improve and expand bicycle parking at various Boardwalk locations. (Seaside Co.)” “Add secure bicycle parking at Santa Cruz High School – and other schools where current racks are overflowing. (Santa Cruz School District)”
“Install bike racks at Market Street Senior Center. (City Parks)” “Install bike lanes along Mission St/Highway One from King St (western intersection) to the City limits; install future bike lanes, sharrows or other bike-friendly treatments along Mission St between the two King St intersections.” (Caltrans)
“Improve Morrissey Avenue bridge over Highway One or construct a new bridge in the vicinity of Trevathan designed for bicyclists and pedestrians or with bike lanes.” (Caltrans) [this would be the last of three promised bike/ped Highway One crossings – Chanticleer is completed and Mar Vista is coming] “Reconfigure/restripe the eastbound Highway 1 intersection with Shaffer Rd to tighten the curve and slow motorists turning onto Shaffer Rd.” (Caltrans)
[the above are recommended projects within City limits that other entities would undertake; a bridge over or tunnel under Highway 17 and a bike path adjacent to Highway One from Lee St. to Market St. recommended earlier may also be Caltrans projects.]
Projects that are outside of City jurisdiction are outside the scope of this plan.

Comments have been forwarded to the appropriate jurisdiction/agency.

Re: bike parking in City parks: staff continues to seek funding to add bike parking at high-use public facilities. In 2026, new inverted U bike parking will be added at the Lighthouse, Harvey West Pool, and the Wharf.
9A

p j y p y p j
list or addressed through other means. I’m available to talk through these should you have any questions, and I look forward to hearing how and whether these ideas may come to fruition. 1) Santa Cruz Riverwalk undercrossing at Water Street on the eastern side of the levee: The low point is prone to collecting mud in the wet season and the downhill portion travelling north (away from the County building) is prone to erosion and gravel year-round, both of which make for challenging and sometimes dangerous conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists alike. Ideally, a long-term solution would entail enhanced drainage and vegetation/slope stabilization accompanied by slightly elevating the path. In the near term, if something can be done to prevent erosion and gravel specifically from the eastern hill as you’re travelling along the undercrossing, it would significantly enhance pedestrian and cyclist safety.
2) River Street South/Front Street (Temporary Bus Station): This area has served as the interim bus station. The current configuration has created extremely unsafe conditions for cyclists, and I ask that the area ultimately enhance multi-modal conditions compared to pre-interim bus station conditions. In terms of the unsafe conditions at present, when travelling north on Front Street, cyclists and buses share space which leads to conflict between cyclists and the buses. In addition, with buses parked on Front Street, there is very poor visibility for cyclists and car users alike when exiting the shopping complex onto Front Street. For cyclists traveling south along Front Street, it is not uncommon to see cars use the right-hand turn lane onto Cooper as a passing lane and/or to use the bike lane (which is already narrow and impacted by parked cars) to pass cars waiting to turn left into the complex. Finally, just this week I was travelling along River South and using the whole lane as directed. A car exited the Trader’s parking lot but did not see me (as it is not uncommon for cars to see right through cyclists). To avoid being hit by the car, I had to veer left into the plastic protective barrier for cyclists travelling in the opposite direction. I crashed and the car never saw me, nor did they stop. I have a swollen knee and bruises, scrapes, and scratches all over my body in addition to damage to my bicycle and bike gear. I’m not sure if any improvements can be made here in the short term, but I would strongly urge multi-modal enhancements once the bus station is partially reopened that eliminate all situations where cyclists are forced to share the road with either cars or buses and that visibility for all users is enhanced whether it is at the expense of parking or through other means.

1. Maintenance of individual facilities is beyond the scope of the Active Transportation Plan.

2. Front Street and River Street South will be redesigned once the new Metro station is open.

18.14 9B
3) Soquel Avenue at Mentel: This is a common intersection crossing after leaving Arana Gulch. A push signal for cyclists (like what exists at the intersection of California and Laurel) at the southeast corner (which could also be accompanied by moving the crosswalk to the eastern side of the intersection) would significantly improve the transition from Arana to Soquel for cyclists and pedestrians alike. This is a difficult four-lane crossing. In addition, Mentel does not have a sidewalk connecting all the way to Arana on the western side of Mentel, so moving the crosswalk to the eastern side creates a more fluid transition, especially for ADA users. 4) Market Street and Berkeley Way/Hubbard Crossing: Similar to the comments directly above, this area is designated part of the “bike way”; however, this crossing has very poor visibility and cars travelling along Market oftentimes drive over the speed limit. Adding a flashing push for cyclists traveling from Berkeley to Hubbard (and perhaps accompanied by relocating the sidewalk to the southern end of the intersection) in addition to perhaps eliminating some parking nearest to the entrance to the Branciforte Creek Path to enhance visibility would significantly improve safety.
5) Market Street/Branciforte Separated Bike Lane and Sidewalk: There is a bike lane and sidewalk along a good chunk of Market Street, but then it ends. Cars often drive over the speed limit and pass too close to cyclists, and you’ll also see pedestrians walking in the roadway. Ideally, a sidewalk and separated bike lane would be constructed in both directions along this stretch to separate cars from bicyclists and pedestrians to allow for safe travel through to the dirt entrance to DeLaveaga. If the area is too constrained, then prioritizing a sidewalk/bike lane as one travels towards Goss and DeLaveaga would still be a significant improvement compared to the existing conditions.

3. Design of individual intersections is beyond the scope of this plan. Sidewalk segment on Mentel has been added to ATP project list.

4. Berkeley Way at Market Street has been added to the plan as a 'Connector' project.

5. Complete bike lanes on Market Street are identified as a project in the Active Transportation Plan. Staff have evaluated the addition of sidewalks on Market Street, and the project is cost prohibitive due to constrained right-of-way and challenging topography.

18.15 Statutory Exemptions. State code number:

_______________________________________________
Print Form
Notice of Exemption Appendix E
To: Office of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency): ____________________________ P.O. Box 3044, Room 113 _______________________________________________ Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 County Clerk
(Address)
___________________________
___________________________
County of: __________________
Project Title: ____________________________________________________________________________ Project Applicant: ________________________________________________________________________ Project Location - Specific:

Project Location - City: ______________________ Project Location - County:

Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:
_____________________
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: _____________________________________________________ Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: ________________________________________________ Exempt Status: (check one):

Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
Reasons why project is exempt:

Lead Agency
Contact Person: ____________________________ Area Code/Telephone/Extension: _______________ If filed by applicant:

1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.

2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Signature: ____________________________ Date:

Signed by Lead Agency Signed by Applicant
Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code. Date Received for filing at OPR:

Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. _______________
Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: ____________________________________ ______________________________________________
______________ Title: _______________________
Revised 2011

18.16 Brittany Inclan
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2026 5:23 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 18: I Support the 2026 Updates of the City of Santa Cruz ATP Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
I support staff recommendations to update the Active Transportation Plan.

Well-designed walking and bicycling infrastructure makes our streets better for everyone, reduces traffic injuries and creates easier and safer daily travel. Complete Streets support public health through physical activity, improved air quality and reduced noise pollution.

An active transportation network is a cost-effective investment that strengthens our economy and lowers commuting costs while expanding mobility options for those who are unable to or choose not to drive including youth, older people and lower-income people.

By prioritizing safer, more accessible streets, The City can reduce motor vehicle traffic, improve neighborhoods and build more resilient transportation.

Please move forward with the proposed Active Transportation Plan.

Thank you,
Karsten Mueller MS, PhD

18.17 Brittany Inclan
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2026 7:39 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 18: I Support the 2026 Updates of the City of Santa Cruz ATP Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
I’m writing to express strong support for adopting the recommendations presented by the Transportation and Public Works Staff in regards to the 2026 updates of the City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan.

I am an avid cyclist in our community. I commute to work from Pleasure Point to the UCSC coastal science campus and I also ride for errands and exercise. Well-designed walking and biking infrastructure makes our streets better for everyone, reducing traffic injuries while creating more comfortable and safer routes for daily travel. Complete streets support public health by encouraging physical activity and improving air quality through reduced vehicle-generated carbon emissions.

An active transportation network is a cost-effective investment that strengthens our local economy - bringing more customers to local businesses and lowering transportation costs for city residents. Just as importantly, it expands mobility options for those who cannot or choose not to drive (this includes my partner, who cannot drive due to a visual impairment - biking is his primary form of transportation), including youth, older adults, and lower-income community members.

By prioritizing safer, more accessible streets, the city can reduce vehicle traffic, enhance neighborhood livability, and build a more resilient transportation system for the future.

I urge you to move forward with the proposed City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan that reflects these benefits and meets the needs of all City of Santa Cruz residents.

Thank you for your time and leadership.

Sincerely,
Colleen Young
Sent from my iPhone

18.18 Brittany Inclan
From: Lilast <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2026 7:35 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Bike safety
Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
I’m writing to express strong support for adopting the recommendations presented by the Transportation and Public Works Staff in regards to the 2026 updates of the City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan.

Well-designed walking and biking infrastructure makes our streets better for everyone, reducing traffic injuries while creating more comfortable and safer routes for daily travel. Complete streets support public health by encouraging physical activity and improving air quality through reduced vehicle-generated carbon emissions.

An active transportation network is a cost-effective investment that strengthens our local economy - bringing more customers to local businesses and lowering transportation costs for city residents. Just as importantly, it expands mobility options for those who cannot or choose not to drive, including youth, older adults, and lower-income community members.

By prioritizing safer, more accessible streets, the city can reduce vehicle traffic, enhance neighborhood livability, and build a more resilient transportation system for the future.

I urge you to move forward with the proposed City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan that reflects these benefits and meets the needs of all City of Santa Cruz residents.

Thank you for your time and leadership.

Sincerely,
Lila Steiner
Aptos
Sent from AOL on Android

18.19 Brittany Inclan
From: Pauline Seales <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2026 8:39 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Active Transportation Plan
Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
I am writing on behalf of over 2000 members of Santa Cruz Climate Action Network in support of the Active Transportation Plan updates.

As a cyclist I am aware of many improvements already made to bike lanes but we need more. On a recent trip to Sacramento I noticed some streets where the bike line was next to the curb and the parking lane was next to the busy traffic.

Overall we need to strongly encourage walkers and bikers and reduce climate polluting vehicles. We also need to greatly improve the bus system, not reduce it. We need to expedite the plan for speeding bus trips along Soquel Ave, extend the rail trail and provide more positive encouragement for switching to electric bikes and vehicles.

Thanks for all your work for a better future.

Pauline Seales

18.20 Brittany Inclan
From: Steve Lustgarden <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2026 12:25 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 18: I Support the 2026 Updates of the City of Santa Cruz ATP Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
I’m writing to express strong support for adopting the recommendations presented by the Transportation and Public Works Staff in regards to the 2026 updates of the City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan.

Well-designed walking and biking infrastructure makes our streets better for everyone, reducing traffic injuries while creating more comfortable and safer routes for daily travel. Complete streets support public health by encouraging physical activity and improving air quality through reduced vehicle-generated carbon emissions.

An active transportation network is a cost-effective investment that strengthens our local economy - bringing more customers to local businesses and lowering transportation costs for city residents. Just as importantly, it expands mobility options for those who cannot or choose not to drive, including youth, older adults, and lower-income community members.

By prioritizing safer, more accessible streets, the city can reduce vehicle traffic, enhance neighborhood livability, and build a more resilient transportation system for the future.

I urge you to move forward with the proposed City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan that reflects these benefits and meets the needs of all City of Santa Cruz residents.

Thank you for your time and leadership.

Steve Lustgarden
Susan Kauffman
Seabright, Santa Cruz

18.21 Brittany Inclan
From: Alyssa Steiner <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2026 4:17 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Item 18: Support for the 2026 Updates of the City of Santa Cruz ATP Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
As a Santa Cruz local who loves to bike and teaches public health, I’m writing to express strong support for adopting the recommendations presented by the Transportation and Public Works Staff in regards to the 2026 updates of the City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan.

Well-designed walking and biking infrastructure makes our streets better for everyone, reducing traffic injuries while creating more comfortable and safer routes for daily travel. Complete streets support public health by encouraging physical activity and improving air quality through reduced vehicle-generated carbon emissions.

An active transportation network is a cost-effective investment that strengthens our local economy - bringing more customers to local businesses and lowering transportation costs for city residents. Just as importantly, it expands mobility options for those who cannot or choose not to drive, including youth, older adults, and lower-income community members.

By prioritizing safer, more accessible streets, the city can reduce vehicle traffic, enhance neighborhood livability, and build a more resilient transportation system for the future.

I urge you to move forward with the proposed City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan that reflects these benefits and meets the needs of all City of Santa Cruz residents.

Thank you for your time and leadership.

Sincerely,
Alyssa Steiner
221 Baldwin Street, SC 95060

18.22 Brittany Inclan
From: Susan Cavalieri <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2026 8:46 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Active Transportation Plan
Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
I’m writing to express strong support for adopting the recommendations presented by the Transportation and Public Works Staff in regards to the 2026 updates of the City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan. We face a very serious climate crisis and must drastically reduce all emissions, especially those from the heavily polluting Transportation Sector.

Well-designed walking and biking infrastructure makes our streets better for everyone, reducing traffic injuries while creating more comfortable and safer routes for daily travel.

Complete streets support public health by encouraging physical activity and improving air quality through reduced vehicle-generated carbon emissions.

An active transportation network strengthens our local economy - bringing more customers to local businesses and lowering transportation costs for city residents. Just as importantly, it expands mobility options for those who cannot or choose not to drive, including youth, older adults, and lower-income community members.

By prioritizing safer, more accessible streets, the city can reduce vehicle traffic, enhance neighborhood livability, especially for those of us living downtown, and build a more resilient and climate oriented transportation system.

I sincerely hope you will approve the proposed City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan that prioritizes the benefits and needs of all City of Santa Cruz residents.

Thank you,
Susan Cavalieri
190 Walnut Ave.

Santa Cruz

18.23 Brittany Inclan
From: Rachel Grad <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2026 5:57 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Use General Fund for street safety this year (Voter request) Dear City Council
I’m a Santa Cruz taxpayer. I support the Active Transportation Plan, but it needs funding to matter.

Please use General Fund dollars this year for quick-build safety for bikes and pedestrians, and cars:
protected bike lanes, safer crossings, and traffic calming devices. We’ve been waiting on projects like the Bay Corridor for too long, and grants aren’t reliable. Santa Cruz's lack of bike safety is astounding. This is one of our most pressing needs that is also fixable. Please act now, and quickly.

Thank you,
Rachel Grad
131 Claremont Terrace
Santa Cruz, CA

18.24 Brittany Inclan
From: Steve J. Jonsson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 7:47 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Santa Cruz ATP
City of Santa Cruz ATP
Dear Mayor Keeley and Councilmembers,
I’m writing to express strong support for adopting the recommendations presented by the Transportation and Public Works Staff in regards to the 2026 updates of the City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan.

Well-designed walking and biking infrastructure makes our streets better for everyone, reducing traffic injuries while creating more comfortable and safer routes for daily travel. Complete streets support public health by encouraging physical activity and improving air quality through reduced vehicle-generated carbon emissions.

An active transportation network is a cost-effective investment that strengthens our local economy - bringing more customers to local businesses and lowering transportation costs for city residents. Just as importantly, it expands mobility options for those who cannot or choose not to drive, including youth, older adults, and lower-income community members.

By prioritizing safer, more accessible streets, the city can reduce vehicle traffic, enhance neighborhood livability, and build a more resilient transportation system for the future.

I urge you to move forward with the proposed City of Santa Cruz Active Transportation Plan that reflects these benefits and meets the needs of all City of Santa Cruz residents.

Thank you for your time and leadership.

Sincerely,
Steven Jönsson
QBP. SF Bay Area Rep
408-672-7690
[email protected]

18.25 Brittany Inclan
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 9:52 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Agenda item 18
 I support the Active Transportation Plan updates.
 But plans alone won't save lives.
 Fund quick-build safety projects now using General Fund dollars.  We cannot wait.
 We are consistently one of the very most dangerous cities to ride and walk in California for over 15 years.  Over 100 individuals reported falling from their bike while crossing RR tracks on Beach st. in a recent nextdoor post.
 We spent over 800k on 3 studies last year. None of them considered the hazard of RR tracks or cited any incidents.

We can do better.

Thank you
Bill Cook

18.26 Brittany Inclan
From: Connie <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 2:37 PM
To: City Council
Subject: CIP
Sent from my iPhone
Dear Mayor and members of the Santa Cruz city council
Please prioritize street safety in the CIP. The City should commit to meeting Vision Zero by 2030, including funding a connected network of protected bike lanes.

I also urge you to allocate General Fund dollars toward street safety—this is a core public safety responsibility.

I also urge you to continue to keep market Street in the future plans. Many people bike there and there are also pedestrians and it is extremely unsafe. The speed of traffic is not under control. We have had multiple incidences along the hillside of cars going up onto the hillside and crashing. I will try to include some photos of a recent event. I realize it is an extremely challenging project, but safety is a huge concern.

Sincerely
Connie Wilson

18.27 Brittany Inclan
From: K Groppi <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 3:11 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Support for the Active Transportation Plan updates Honorable Council Members,
I am writing in support of completing the 2017 Active Transportation Plan projects whether or not grant funds are secured.

As a biker for over 40 years in Santa Cruz, I'm grateful for all of the bike infrastructure improvements over time. Their cost benefit ratio is favorable since walking and biking have a higher risk factor that traveling in cars, and the projects often cost less than other projects.

Projects that make our transportation network safer for bikers and pedestrians make it more accessible, normalize sustainable low carbon transportation and promote healthy activity for citizens of all ages. According to the data in the plan, dollars spent on bike and pedestrian infrastructure will have larger impacts on safety and usability. I urge you to find funding to complete the listed projects even if grants are not available.

Gratefully,
K. Groppi
214 Mission St, Santa Cruz, CA 95060

18.28 Santa Cruz
Active Transportation
Plan Update
City Council Adoption
April 28, 2026

18.29 Agenda
 Planning Process
 Plan Overview
 Next Steps
Call to Action:

Adopt the ATP Update

18.30 Planning Process
Engagement Pop-ups, online map, focus
groups
Open House,
bike-ped focus group Open House
Advisory
Committee January 2025 July 2025 January 2026
TPWC Meetings November 2025,
February 2026
City Council April 2026
Draft and Final Plan

18.31 January 28
Open House
84 attendees!

18.32 What We
Heard at
Open House
Received 49
comment
cards with
feedback
“I can see improvements all
over town I love! Thank you!”
“I'm excited about the Spring
Street project for cycling and
the pedestrian network
recommendations near
Westlake Pond”
“Soquel Ave desperately needs
more separated bike
infrastructure. Nothing else
comes close to making it
safe.”
Generally, there was strong support for the plan. Concerns brought up included:
• Removal of on-street parking
• E-bikes and lack of enforcement
• Vehicle speeding, especially on Broadway

18.33 What We
Heard at
Open House
Received 49
comment
cards with
feedback
Question
Average score
1= strongly disagree to
5 = strongly agree
Overall, the plan is headed in the right
direction 4
The recommended projects show a balance
across neighborhoods 3.78
Implementation of the plan will increase my
mobility 3.79
On all arterials and collectors,
implementation of active transportation
infrastructure shall have a higher priority
than on-street parking

3.84 Are the sidewalk priorities correct filling gaps
near schools, parks, key destinations? 4.02
The City should install sidewalk on at least
one side of every street, excluding short,
dead-end streets.

3.9 18.34
Final
Plan is
live!
https://letsmodo.org/
planning-safestreets/scatp-2/

18.35 The ATP Update is the City of Santa Cruz’s 10-year playbook to make walking and biking safe, easy, and joyful for everyone.

What the ATP Covers
Proposed Bike Facilities
and Sidewalks
Policies and Programs
42 miles of new or upgrades bike
facilities, including 6 miles of
multiuse paths
7 miles of new sidewalks, filling in
gaps within a ¼ mile of schools,
parks, and equity destinations
E-bikes
Sustainable funding for sidewalk
improvements
Topics addressed include:

Operational changes at signalized
intersections
Ongoing education and enforcement
programs
78% of respondents at the Open House
agreed or strongly agreed the plan is headed
in the right direction. 18.36

18.37 Goal 1: Safety &
Security

18.38 Safety Action Plan
Based on TAC feedback, ATP
includes a list of priority
intersections for pedestrian
safety improvements

18.39 Safety Action Plan FSI = crashes that result
in fatality or serious injury
City is also working on a Safety Action Plan to further address traffic safety for all modes.

Draft Safety Action Plan will be presented to TPWC in
August 2026.

18.40 Riverwalk & Roadway Lighting

18.41 Goal 2:

Networks

18.42 Existing
Bicycle
Network

18.43 Recommended
Bicycle
Network
DRAFT
No facility
recommendations
shown on Mission St,
but plan includes a
section noting the
corridor’s challenges
for walking and
bicycling and need for
continued
coordination with
Caltrans

18.44 Priority
Sidewalks
DRAFT
Based on TAC
feedback, additional
sidewalk
recommendations
were added.
54 7

18.45 Crossing Recommendations
• Improve asset management / data on crossing characteristics • Establish crossing spacing guidelines – Recommend 800’ (or approximately every two blocks)
• Standardize use of safe and comfortable crossing treatments • Improve Rail Trail crossings at California Ave, Almar Ave and Swift St
• Prioritize improvements at top pedestrian crash locations: US 1/US 9, Ocean St/Hubbard St, Water St/Pacific St/Front St, Front St/Laurel St

18.46 Policy Recommendations
• Low-stress bike facilities: Bike facilities must be low-stress (LTS 1 or 2), separated from motor vehicles on arterials, prioritized over parking on arterials and collectors, and should be neighborhood collectors or bike lanes on local streets
• Continuous sidewalks: Ensure continuous sidewalk exists on at least one side of the street (excluding cul-de-sacs), prioritizing sidewalks within 0.25 mi of schools, parks, and equity destinations • Sidewalk-upon-sale: Expand existing policy requiring property owners to maintain sidewalks along property frontages to include that the owner must fix or install sidewalk to meet city standards at time of sale. If sidewalk cannot be installed then, owners may pay fee towards dedicated sidewalk fund. • Sidewalk financing: Explore financing to build out sidewalk network, including parcel tax to fund sidewalk maintenance and crosswalk improvements. To minimize burden on moderate-to-low-income households, a sidewalk maintenance loan program should be established to provide a matching grant or free financing repayment plan for those who qualify.

18.47 Goal 3:

Continued
Investment

18.48 Prioritization Framework
Updated based on TPWC
feedback to clarify scoring
process

18.49 Prioritized
Bike Projects

18.50 Cost Estimate

18.51 Implementation

18.52 Measuring Progress

18.53 Goal 4:

Education &
Encouragement

18.54 Programs
State bill
under
review to
require e-
bike
permits at
all K-12
schools

18.55 Adopt plan
Finish
Safety
Action
Plan
Seek
funding
The ATP Update is the City of Santa Cruz’s 10-year playbook to make walking and biking safe, easy, and joyful for everyone.

Next Steps

18.56 Thank
you!

18.57 City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/10/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: Police
SUBJECT: Receipt of AB 481 Annual Military Equipment Report, Amendment of Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 9.90, and Resolution Adopting a Policy Update Pertaining to AB 481 Military Equipment (PD) LOCATION: Citywide
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to:
1) Receive the Santa Cruz Police Department’s (SCPD) Annual Military Equipment Report; 2) Introduce for publication an ordinance amending Santa Cruz Municipal Code (SCMC) Chapter 9.90 “AB 481 Military Equipment Use” clarifying the procedure for amending the Military Equipment Use Policy in SCPD Policy 705; and
3) Adopt a resolution adopting an amended Military Equipment Use Policy (SCPD Policy 705), which (a) incorporates the acquisition of additional military equipment, and (b) modifies section 705.10 (“Use in Exigent Circumstances”) to more accurately capture the Council’s intent when this matter came before the Council in 2025.

BACKGROUND: AB 481 establishes requirements for the funding, acquisition, and use of items deemed “military equipment” (Gov’t Code § 7070(c)) in law enforcement and state agencies. AB 481 requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval from their governing body, via ordinance, to adopt a military equipment use policy before purchasing, raising funds for, or acquiring military equipment. (Gov’t Code § 7071(a)(1).) A law enforcement agency that receives approval for a military equipment policy must submit an annual military equipment report to its governing body for each type of military equipment approved by the governing body within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment remains available for use. (Gov’t Code § 7072(a).) The law enforcement agency is also required to hold a community engagement meeting within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual military equipment report. (Gov’t Code § 7072(b).) AB 481 also requires the governing body to review the ordinance adopting a military equipment use policy at least annually and vote on whether to renew the ordinance at a regular meeting held pursuant to the Brown Act. (Gov’t Code § 7071(e)(1).) The governing body must determine, based on the annual military equipment report, whether each type of military equipment

19.1 identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval set forth in Government Code § 7071(d), including the following:

A. The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

B. The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.

C. If purchasing the equipment, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

D. Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

If the governing body determines that certain military equipment identified in the annual military equipment report has not complied with the above standards, the governing body must either disapprove a renewal of the authorization for that type of military equipment or require modifications to the military equipment use policy in a manner that will resolve the lack of compliance. (Gov’t Code § 7071(e)(2).)
In addition to presenting the 2025 Annual Report, SCPD proposes amending SCMC Chapter

9.90 (“AB 481 Military Equipment Use”) to clarify the procedure for amending the Military Equipment Use Policy (SCPD Policy 705) going forward. In the proposed resolution, SCPD asks Council to approve the acquisition of two (2) Skydio R10 Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), and SCPD also proposes a revision to Policy 705 to more accurately capture the Council’s intent regarding use of military equipment during exigent circumstances.

DISCUSSION: The attached 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report provides available data for each type of military equipment approved by the Santa Cruz City Council for the 2025 calendar year (January 1, 2025 – December 31, 2025), and includes:
1) A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use. 2) A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment. 3) The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response. 4) The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report. 5) The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment. 6) If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.

SCPD publicly released the 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report on its website on March 23, 2026, and provided the City Council a copy on March 25, 2026. SCPD hosted a virtual community meeting on April 1, 2026 via Zoom to present the Department’s 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report pursuant to AB 481 and to answer questions from community members. In total, eight (8) members of the community joined the virtual meeting. At the

19.2 conclusion of the presentation, SCPD staff answered a variety of questions from the community that included, but were not limited to:
 Details requested on specific uses of the UAS and armored patrol vehicle during calls for service and select mass gatherings.
 Why are personnel, transportation, and storage costs not captured in the 2025 annual report?
 Why is the Category 12 (flashbang, teargas, and pepper balls) inventory so large?  Why does the SCPD need interior UASs?
 Details requested around a specific domestic violence case where police used a UAS, 40mm ammo, and requested support from the Santa Cruz Sheriff’s Office.  Do UAS deployments from vehicles require the use of Category 5 command and control vehicles?
 How are patrol rifles accounted for during deployments?  Why do officers use large quantities of training ammunition?  Requests to provide specific costs and amounts for replenishing consumable equipment.

The proposed amendments to SCMC Chapter 9.90 clarify that future amendments to the Military Equipment Use Policy in SCPD Policy 705 may be approved by the City Council via resolution.

By way of the attached resolution, the SCPD proposes two amendments to the Military Equipment Use Policy in Policy 705 Military Equipment.

The first amendment modifies the language in section 705.10 “Use in Exigent Circumstances” to more accurately reflect the City Council’s direction from its April 22, 2025 meeting, relating to the use of military equipment not included in the policy in exigent circumstances.

The second amendment seeks the City Council’s approval to acquire and add to the Military Equipment Use Policy in SCPD Policy 705 two (2) Skydio R10 interior UASs. The compact, highly maneuverable UAS is designed for safe and effective operations in confined or indoor environments during high-risk incidents such as active shooters, barricade subjects, hostage rescues, building searches, and other operations where larger drones or ground-based teams cannot support officer and civilian safety. The Skydio R10 UAS is the only reasonable solution that meets this critical need while remaining cost effective, as it integrates seamlessly with the Department’s existing Skydio X10 fleet and Axon Evidence platform, eliminating the need for additional training or software systems.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) DETERMINATION: The proposed Council action is not a “Project” under the CEQA because it will not cause physical change in the environment directly or indirectly. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21065.) HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP): The proposed Council action supports the City’s HiAP pillars of public health and equity, which emphasizes integrating health, well-being, and equity into policymaking to create safer, more supportive communities. By providing a detailed account of equipment usage and compliance with oversight measures, the AB 481 Military Equipment Annual Report and SCPD Policy 705 ensure that public safety strategies are data-driven and community-informed. This approach helps build trust between law enforcement and residents, ensuring that policies governing public safety resources contribute to a community environment that prioritizes equity, security, and overall public health.

19.3 FISCAL IMPACT:

1. The recommendation in this report impacts the General Fund: No

2. This recommendation requires a budget adjustment: No

3. The recommendation creates an on-going expenditure commitment: No FISCAL IMPACT DESCRIPTION: The two (2) Skydio X10 UAS units, warranty, licensing and software costs are incorporated into the proposed General Fund budget for FY 2027, with $58,353 in funding transferred from the Police Asset Seizure 214 Fund. Training costs are estimated at $1,366 and will be supported by the proposed SCPD operating budget in FY 2027.

Prepared By:

Catherine Brothers
Principal Management
Analyst
Submitted By:

Bernie Escalante
Chief of Police
Approved By:

Matt Huffaker
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. ORDINANCE - CLEAN.DOCX

2. ORDINANCE - TRACK CHANGES.DOCX

3. RESOLUTION.DOCX

4. EXHIBIT A – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT REPORT.PDF

5. EXHIBIT B – SCPD POLICY 705 MILITARY EQUIPMENT – CLEAN.DOCX

6. SCPD POLICY 705 MILITARY EQUIPMENT – TRACK CHANGES.DOCX

19.4 ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ AMENDING CHAPTER 9.90 OF THE SANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO AB 481 MILITARY EQUIPMENT WHEREAS, on September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481, creating Government Code Section 7070, et seq., relating to the use of military equipment by California law enforcement agencies;
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2022, the Santa Cruz City Council (“City Council”) adopted Ordinance 2022-09, adding Chapter 9.90 to the Santa Cruz Municipal Code (“SCMC”) and adopting a Military Equipment Use Policy (“Policy”);
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to SCMC Chapter 9.90 clarify that future amendments to the Policy may be approved by the City Council via resolution; WHEREAS, it is the intent of this ordinance to clarify the procedure for introducing amendments to the Policy while maintaining the public transparency required by Assembly Bill 481.

BE IT ORDAINED by the City of Santa Cruz as follows:

SECTION 1. Chapter 9.90 of the Santa Cruz Municipal Code is amended as follows:
“9.90.010 MILITARY EQUIPMENT POLICY.
(a) On May 10, 2022, the city council adopted Ordinance 2022-09 approving the military equipment use policy (“policy”) set forth in Santa Cruz Police Department Policy 705 after having made the following determinations:
(1) The military equipment inventoried and presented in the policy is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety;
(2) The proposed policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties;
(3) The equipment identified in the policy is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety, if any;
(4) Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or, if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

19.5 (b) Prior to approval, the police department submitted the proposed policy to the city council and made those documents available on the police department’s website for at least thirty days prior to the public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue. (c) The policy was considered by the city council as an agenda item in an open session of a regular meeting, noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, at which public comment was permitted.
(d) The city council may approve amendments to the policy via resolution as an agenda item in an open session of a regular meeting, noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act.
(e) Prior to amending the policy, the police department shall submit the proposed amendments to the city council and shall make those proposed amendments available on the police department’s website for at least thirty days prior to the public hearing concerning the amendments at issue. As part of any council action amending the policy, the city council shall make the findings set forth in subsections (a)(1) through (4). (f) The policy and amendments thereto shall be made publicly available on the police department’s website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. (g) The police department shall submit an annual military equipment report to the city council, containing the information required in Government Code Section 7072, and the city council shall determine whether each type of military equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval set forth in subsections (a)(1) through (4).
(h) The city council shall review this chapter and vote on whether to renew it, on an annual basis at a regular meeting, in accordance with Government Code Section 7071(e)(2). (i) The city council approves the use of the policy and finds that it satisfies the requirements of Government Code Section 7070(d).”
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after final adoption.

19.6 PASSED FOR PUBLICATION this 28th of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: ______________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
PASSED FOR FINAL ADOPTION this 12th of May, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: ______________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
This is to certify that the above and
foregoing document is the original
of Ordinance No. 2026-xx and that
it has been published or posted in
accordance with the Charter of the
City of Santa Cruz.
________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

19.7 ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ AMENDING CHAPTER 9.90 OF THE SANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO AB 481 MILITARY EQUIPMENT WHEREAS, on September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481, creating Government Code Section 7070, et seq., relating to the use of military equipment by California law enforcement agencies;
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2022, the Santa Cruz City Council (“City Council”) adopted Ordinance 2022-09, adding Chapter 9.90 to the Santa Cruz Municipal Code (“SCMC”) and adopting a Military Equipment Use Policy (“Policy”);
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to SCMC Chapter 9.90 clarify that future amendments to the Policy may be approved by the City Council via resolution; WHEREAS, it is the intent of this ordinance to clarify the procedure for introducing amendments to the Policy while maintaining the public transparency required by Assembly Bill 481.

BE IT ORDAINED by the City of Santa Cruz as follows:

SECTION 1. Chapter 9.90 of the Santa Cruz Municipal Code is amended as follows:
“9.90.010 MILITARY EQUIPMENT POLICY.
(a) On May 10, 2022, the city council adopted Ordinance 2022-09 approving the The city council hereby adopts the April 2025 military equipment use policy (“policy”) set forth in Santa Cruz Police Department Policy 705 after having made the following determinations:
(1) The military equipment inventoried and presented in the policy is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety;
(2) The proposed policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties;
(3) The equipment identified in the policy is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety, if any;
(4) Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or, if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

19.8 (b) Prior to approval, tThe police department has submitted thea proposed policy to the city council and has made those documents available on the police department’s website for at least thirty days prior to the public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue. (c) The policy was considered by the city council as an agenda item in an open session of a regular meeting, noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, at which public comment was permitted.
(d) The city council may approve amendments to the policy via resolution as an agenda item in an open session of a regular meeting, noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act.
(c)(e) Prior to amending the policy, the police department shall submit the proposed amendments to the city council and shall make those proposed amendments available on the police department’s website for at least thirty days prior to the public hearing concerning the amendments at issue. As part of any council action amending the policy, the city council shall make the findings set forth in subsections (a)(1) through (4). (d)(f) The policy and amendments thereto shall be made publicly available on the police department’s website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. (e)(g) The police department shall submit an annual military equipment report to the city council, containing the information required in Government Code Section 7072, and the city council shall determine whether each type of military equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval set forth in subsections (a)(1) through (4).
(f)(h) The city council shall review this chapter and vote on whether to renew it, on an annual basis at a regular meeting, in accordance with Government Code Section 7071(e)(2).
(g)(i) The city council approves the use of the policy and finds that it satisfies the requirements of Government Code Section 7070(d).”
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after final adoption.
//
//
//
//

19.9 PASSED FOR PUBLICATION this 28th of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: ______________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
PASSED FOR FINAL ADOPTION this 12th of May, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: ______________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator
This is to certify that the above and
foregoing document is the original
of Ordinance No. 2026-xx and that
it has been published or posted in
accordance with the Charter of the
City of Santa Cruz.
________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

19.10 RESOLUTION NO. NS-XX,XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ RENEWING CHAPTER 9.90 OF THE SANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO AB 481

MILITARY EQUIPMENT, AS AMENDED, AND APPROVING A REVISED MILITARY

EQUIPMENT USE POLICY
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2022, the Santa Cruz City Council (“City Council”) adopted Ordinance 2022-09, adding Chapter 9.90 to the Santa Cruz Municipal Code (“SCMC”) and adopting a Military Equipment Use Policy pursuant to Assembly Bill (“AB”) 481; and WHEREAS, consistent with Government Code section 7072, the City Council received and reviewed the Santa Cruz Police Department (“Department”) 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report on March 25, 2026 for each type of military equipment approved by the City Council (“2025 Annual Military Equipment Report”) attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. The 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report was also posted on the Department’s website; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 7071(e)(1), the City Council has reviewed SCMC Chapter 9.90, which is part of the Council packet for the meeting when this Resolution was considered; and
WHEREAS, the Council has also reviewed the Department’s Military Equipment Use Policy with proposed amendments, which is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 7071(a)(1)(C), the Department is requesting approval, via proposed amendments the Military Equipment Use Policy, to acquire two (2) Skydio R10 Unmanned Aerial Systems (“UASs”); and
WHEREAS, the addition of the Skydio R10 UASs to the Department’s inventory will enable the Department to respond to a variety of service calls, specifically those involving confined or indoor environments and high-risk incidents, and will support officer and civilian safety that no other reasonable alternative equipment can provide; and WHEREAS, the Skydio R10 UASs will integrate with the Department’s existing Skydio X10 UASs, Axon evidence storage platform, and UAS policy to support safeguards to protect public welfare, safety, civil rights and civil liberties; and WHEREAS, the proposed additional amendments to the Military Equipment Use Policy clarify the City Council’s prior direction regarding use of military equipment not included in the Military Equipment Use Policy during exigent circumstances; and WHEREAS, the Department posted proposed amendments to the Military Equipment Use Policy on the Department’s website at least thirty (30) days prior to the public hearing concerning the amendments; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Santa Cruz as follows:

19.11 A. The City Council finds that the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference as findings.

B. The City Council desires to and hereby confirms the renewal of the AB 481 Military Equipment Ordinance, which shall remain in effect until the next reporting period required under AB 481.

C. The City of Santa Cruz adopts Exhibit B as the Department’s new Military Equipment Use Policy (Policy 705). The attached Exhibit B adds two (2) Skydio R10 Unmanned Aerial Systems to the equipment list contained within the Military Equipment Use Policy and also has revised language in Section 705.10 “Use in Exigent Circumstances” that is more consistent with the City Council’s prior direction.

D. The City Council finds that the Military Equipment Use Policy (Policy 705) (Exhibit B) complies with the standards for approval set forth in Government Code section 7071(d)(1).

The City Council further finds that each type of military equipment identified in the 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report has complied with the following standards for approval set forth in Government Code section 7071(d)(1) in that:
(a) The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. (b) The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.
(c) The military equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. (d) Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th of April, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DISQUALIFIED:

APPROVED: ______________________________
Fred Keeley, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Bonnie Bush, City Clerk Administrator

19.12 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
1 OVERVIEW
California State Assembly Bill (AB) 481, effective January 1, 2022, establishes requirements for the funding, acquisition, and use of items deemed “military equipment” (Gov’t Code § 7070(c)) in law enforcement and state agencies. The bill’s intent installs enforceable safeguards, including transparency, accountability, and oversight to protect the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties. AB 481 requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval from their governing body via ordinance adopting a military equipment use policy prior to purchasing, raising funds for, or acquiring military equipment. Gov’t Code § 7071(a)(1).

On May 10, 2022, the City of Santa Cruz City Council adopted Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 9.90, approving the military equipment use policy set forth in Santa Cruz Police Department Policy 705. Pursuant to AB 481, the Santa Cruz Police Department (“Department”) will publish an annual report for each type of military equipment approved by the Santa Cruz City Council within one year of approval and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use. Gov’t Code § 7072(a). The annual military equipment report must include the following information for the immediately preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment:
(1) A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use. (2) A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment. (3) The results of any internal audits, information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken inresponse. (4) The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report.
(5) The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment. (6) If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.

Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual military equipment report, the Department will hold a well/publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting. Gov’t Code § 7072(b). The community engagement meeting will allow the public to discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the law enforcement agency’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

This Annual Report provides available data for each type of military equipment approved by the Santa Cruz City Council for the 2025 calendar year (January 1, 2025 - December 31, 2025). Consistent with Government Code section 7071(d)(1), the Department finds that the equipment listed in this Annual Report is necessary and there is no reasonable alternative to achieve the same officer and civilian safety; Department Policy 705 includes strict safeguards to protect public welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties; the equipment contained in this Annual Report and proposed additional purchases, are reasonably cost-effective compared to available alternatives; and, all prior use has complied with Department Policy 705 that was in effect at the time of said use.

EXHIBIT A

19.13 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
2 CATEGORY 1 / Robot
Inventory
Recon Robotics “Throw bot”; Quantity: 1
Recon Robotics “Throw bot II”; Quantity: 1
Robotex AVITAR II; Quantity: 0 (the Department has access to two AVITAR II robots maintained by the Santa Cruz Sheriff’s Office) Use Reporting
Intended Acquisition in 2026
The Department does not intend to acquire additional robots in 2026.

Total Annual Cost
Training personnel costs ($8,404).

No annual cost to the Department for the Robotex AVITAR II.

Annual costs for personnel, transportation, and storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget.

Use
Number Date Incident Type Agency Assist? Use Summary Complaint Summary Audit
1 2/2/25 Training N/A Throw bot II used during Emergency Services Unit training.

N/A N/A
2 6/24/25 Training N/A
Throw bot II used during Emergency Services Unit
training. N/A N/A
3 11/5/25 Training N/A Throw bot II used during Emergency Service Unit tactical Team training.

N/A N/A

19.14 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
3 CATEGORY 1 / Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Inventory
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs); Quantity: 3
Use Reporting
Use
Number Date Incident Type Agency Assist? Use Summary Location Complaint Summary Audit/Shared with
Outside Agency
1 12/31/25 Fire Santa Cruz Fire Department
(“SCFD”) Confirmed structure fire.

Ingalls Street, Santa
Cruz N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCFD
2 12/31/25 Fire SCFD Confirmed structure fire.

Heath Street, Santa
Cruz N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCFD
3 12/31/25 Crime in
progress
No Restraining order violation.

Jackson Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
4 12/25/25 Crime in
progress
No Suspect actively
trespassing/prowling.

Sylvania Avenue,
Santa Cruz N/A No
5 12/20/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject in possession of a
firearm.

Poplar Avenue, Santa
Cruz N/A No
6 12/19/25 Crime in
progress
No Residential burglary in
progress.

Pennsylvania Avenue,
Santa Cruz N/A No
7 12/16/25 Search warrant No Search warrant service
operation.

Moon Alley, Santa
Cruz N/A No

19.15 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
4 8 12/12/25 Crime in
progress
No Violent crime in progress.

Pryce Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
9 12/10/25
Search and
rescue/Water
rescue
SCFD Water search and rescue.

West Cliff Drive,
Santa Cruz N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCFD
10 12/7/25 Crime in
progress
No Suspect brandishing machete.

River Street and Water
Street, Santa Cruz N/A No
11 12/7/25 Crime in
progress
No Theft of high valued e-bike in
progress.

Brommer Street,
Santa Cruz N/A No
12 12/7/25
Search and
rescue/Water
rescue
No Subject threatening to jump off
high elevation to rocks below.

Steamers Lane, Santa
Cruz N/A No
13 12/7/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject acting erratically and
accosting people.

Lighthouse, Santa
Cruz N/A No
14 12/2/25 Department
training No Department training.
155 Center Street,
Santa Cruz N/A No
15 12/2/25 Department
training No Department training.
155 Center Street,
Santa Cruz N/A No
16 11/24/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject acting erratically and
accosting people.

Pacific Avenue and
Cooper Street, Santa
Cruz
N/A No
17 11/24/25 Crime in
progress
No Violent crime in progress.

River Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No

19.16 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
5 18 11/20/25 Crime in
progress
No Violent crime in progress.

River Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
19 11/19/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject brandishing knife.

Soquel Avenue, Santa
Cruz N/A No
20 11/17/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject screaming threats near
school.

Cabrillo Highway,
Santa Cruz N/A No
21 11/5/25 Search Warrant No Search warrant service
operation.

Broadway and Darwin
Street, Santa Cruz N/A No
22 11/5/25 Search Warrant No Search warrant service
operation.

Broadway and Darwin
Street, Santa Cruz N/A No
23 11/2/25 Crime in
progress
No Stolen vehicle recovery.

Emmet Street and
Mission Street, Santa
Cruz
N/A No
24 10/31/25 Crime in
progress
No Halloween downtown
deployment operation.

Downtown Pacific
Avenue, Santa Cruz N/A No
25 10/29/25 Crime in
progress
No Commercial burglary in
progress.

River Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
26 10/28/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject in possession of a
firearm.

Golf Club Drive,
Santa Cruz N/A No
27 10/28/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject in possession of a
firearm.

Market Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
28 10/27/25 Crime in
progress
No Felony crime in progress.

Front Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No

19.17 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
6 29 10/27/25 Crime in
progress
No Robbery in progress.

River Street and Front
Street, Santa Cruz N/A No
30 10/26/25 Search Warrant No Search warrant service
operation.

Raymond Street,
Santa Cruz N/A No
31 10/26/25
Search and
rescue/Water
rescue
SCFD Water search and rescue.
55 Municipal Wharf,
Santa Cruz N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCFD
32 10/26/25 Crime in
progress
No Robbery in progress.

Mission Street and Fair
Avenue, Santa Cruz N/A No
33 10/24/25 Crime in
progress
No Stolen vehicle recovery.

Blackburn Street,
Santa Cruz N/A No
34 10/21/25 Traffic collision
documentation No Traffic collision scene documentation.

Frederick Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
35 10/21/25 Lost or missing
person
No Search for missing person.

Chico Avenue, Santa
Cruz N/A No
36 10/20/25 Lost or missing
person
No Search for missing person.

West Cliff Drive,
Santa Cruz N/A No
37 10/20/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject brandishing knife.

Soquel Avenue, Santa
Cruz N/A No
38 10/19/25 Search and
rescue
SCFD Search for reported injured
person.

Empire Grade, Santa
Cruz N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCFD

19.18 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
7 39 10/18/25 Crime in
progress
No Residential burglary in
progress.

King Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
40 10/17/25 Crime in
progress
No Residential burglary in
progress.

King Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
41 10/15/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Subject smashing car
windows.

San Lorenzo Park,
Santa Cruz N/A No
42 10/14/25 Crime in
progress
No Stolen vehicle recovery and
reported firearm.

Laurent Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
43 10/12/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject engaging in lewd
activity.

Harbor Drive, Santa
Cruz N/A No
44 10/12/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Theft suspect fled the area.

River Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
45 10/11/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Restraining order violation.

Bayona Drive, Santa
Cruz N/A No
46 10/10/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Subject trespassing/prowling.

Water Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
47 10/9/25 Lost or missing
person
No Search for missing person.

Golf Club Drive,
Santa Cruz N/A No
48 10/9/25 Lost or missing
person
No Search for missing person.

Encinal Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
49 10/8/25 Traffic collision
documentation No Traffic collision scene documentation.

Ingalls Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No

19.19 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
8 50 10/7/25 Department
training No Department training.
200 Washington
Street, Santa Cruz N/A No
51 10/6/25 Department
training No Department training.
155 Center Street,
Santa Cruz N/A No
52 10/3/25 Search Warrant No Search warrant service
operation.

Cedar Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
53 10/1/25 Search Warrant No Search warrant service
operation.

Capitola Road, Santa
Cruz N/A No
54 9/29/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Felony crime in progress.

Lighthouse Avenue,
Santa Cruz N/A No
55 9/29/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Felony crime in progress.

Lighthouse Avenue,
Santa Cruz N/A No
56 9/29/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject trespassing/prowling.

Bethany Curve, Santa
Cruz N/A No
57 9/28/25 Crime in
progress
No Fight in progress.

Center Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
58 9/28/25 Crime in
progress
Santa Cruz County Sheriff’s
Office (“SCSO”) Reported gunshot at residence.

Sea Ridge Court,
Aptos N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCSO
59 9/28/25 Crime in
progress
No Violent crime in progress.

Encinal Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No

19.20 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
9 60 9/26/25 Crime in
progress
No Brandishing of a firearm.

River Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
61 9/24/25 Crime in
progress
No Intoxicated subject near cliff's
edge.

W Cliff, Santa Cruz N/A No
62 9/24/25 Crime in
progress
No
Subject disrupting business
operations tampering with
vehicles.

River Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
63 9/23/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject acting erratically
running in and out of roadway.

SR/1 and River Street,
Santa Cruz N/A N
64 9/23/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject acting erratically
running in and out of roadway.

Branciforte and Water,
Santa Cruz N/A No
65 9/23/25 Crime in
progress
No Domestic violence incident in
progress.

Escalona Drive, Santa
Cruz N/A No
66 9/22/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Assault with a deadly weapon.

Riverside Avenue,
Santa Cruz N/A No
67 9/16/25 Department
training No Department training.

Cottonwood Street,
Santa Cruz N/A No
68 9/16/25 Crime in
progress
No Residential burglary in
progress.

Center Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
69 9/15/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Grand theft in progress.

Dakota Avenue, Santa
Cruz N/A No
70 9/14/25 Lost or missing
person
No Missing person at risk.

Harvey West
Boulevard, Santa Cruz N/A No

19.21 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
10 71 9/13/25 Crime in
progress
No Domestic violence incident
firearm involved.

San Jose Avenue,
Santa Cruz
N/A No
72 9/13/25 Crime in
progress
No Domestic violence incident
firearm involved.

San Jose Avenue,
Santa Cruz N/A No
73 9/13/25 Community
event
No Race the Wave city event.
55 Municipal Wharf,
Santa Cruz N/A No
74 9/13/25 Community
Event No Race the Wave city event.
55 Municipal Wharf,
Santa Cruz N/A No
75 9/8/25 Search Warrant No Subject with a felony warrant.

Soquel Avenue, Santa
Cruz N/A No
76 9/7/25 Crime in
progress
No Violent felony crime in
progress.

Wilkes Circle, Santa
Cruz N/A No
77 9/5/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Violent felony suspect fleeing.

Water Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
78 9/5/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Violent felony suspect fleeing.

Water Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
79 9/3/25 Crime in
progress
No Bike sting operation.

Soquel Avenue, Santa
Cruz N/A No
80 9/2/25 Lost or missing
person
No Missing person at risk.

Cabrillo Highway,
Santa Cruz N/A No
81 9/2/25 Crime in
progress
No Theft in progress.

Front Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No

19.22 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
11 82 9/1/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject trespassing/prowling.

Jackson Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
83 9/1/25 Crime in
progress
No Felony crime in progress.

N Pacific Avenue,
Santa Cruz N/A No
84 9/1/25 Search warrant No Felony wanted subject.

Municipal Wharf,
Santa Cruz N/A No
85 8/31/25 Search warrant No Felony wanted subject.

Center Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
86 8/27/25 Crime in
progress
No Felony theft suspect.

River Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
87 8/27/25 Search warrant No Wanted subject.

Agnes Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
88 8/27/25 Crime in
progress
No Subjects trespassing.

Agnes Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
89 8/26/25 Crime in
progress
No Felony wanted subject.

Ocean Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
90 8/26/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject in possession of a
firearm.
300 block Ocean
Street, Santa Cruz N/A No
91 8/26/25 Fire SCFD Smoke investigation.

Coast Vista Trail,
Santa Cruz N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCFD

19.23 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
12 92 8/26/25 Fire SCFD Smoke investigation.

Cypress Park, Santa
Cruz N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCFD
93 8/25/25 Department
training No Department training.
155 Center Street,
Santa Cruz N/A No
94 08/17/25 Crime in
progress
No Restraining order violation.

Cabrillo Highway,
Santa Cruz N/A No
95 8/17/25 Crime in
progress
No Restraining order violation.

Cabrillo Highway,
Santa Cruz N/A No
96 8/12/25 Crime in
progress
Watsonville Police
Department (“WPD”)
Commercial burglary in
progress.

West Beach Street,
Watsonville N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with WPD
97 8/2/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Vehicle pursuit and fleeing
suspect.

Palomino Way, Santa
Cruz N/A No
98 7/31/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject in possession of a
firearm.

Cedar Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
99 7/30/25 Crime in
progress
No Restraining order violation.

Golf Club Drive,
Santa Cruz N/A No
100 7/28/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject in possession of a
firearm.

Mission Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
101 7/27/25 Community
event
SCSO/Capitola Police
Department (“CPD”)
Wharf to Wharf event.
7th Avenue, Santa
Cruz N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCSO & CPD

19.24 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
13 102 7/23/25 Crime in
progress
No Vehicle pursuit.
55 Cabrillo Highway,
Santa Cruz N/A No
103 7/10/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject in possession of a
firearm.

Walk Circle, Santa
Cruz N/A No
104 7/2/25 Search warrant No Search warrant service
operation.

Seabright Avenue,
Santa Cruz N/A No
105 7/2/25 Search warrant No Search warrant service
operation.

Seabright Avenue,
Santa Cruz N/A No
106 6/26/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject in possession of a
firearm.

Pennsylvania Avenue,
Santa Cruz N/A No
107 6/20/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Robbery suspects fled in the
area.

Beach Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
108 6/16/25 Department
training No Department training.

Evergreen Street,
Santa Cruz N/A No
109 6/15/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
SCSO Stolen vehicle recovery and
suspect fled.

Soquel Avenue, Santa
Cruz N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCSO
110 6/12/25 Department
training No Department training.

Spring Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
111 6/12/25 Department
training No Department training.

Golf Club Drive,
Santa Cruz N/A No

19.25 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
14 112 6/7/25 Crime in
progress
No Stolen vehicle recovery.

Cedar and Cathcart,
Santa Cruz N/A No
113 5/30/25 Lost or missing
person
No Search for missing person.

Beach Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
114 5/28/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject armed with machete.

Market Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
115 5/23/25 Crime in
progress
No Report of gunshots heard in
the area.

La Fonda Avenue,
Santa Cruz N/A No
116 5/16/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Robbery suspect fled in the
area.

Golf Club Drive,
Santa Cruz N/A No
117 5/12/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject in possession of a
firearm.

Front Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
118 5/4/25 Lost or missing
person
SCFD Search for missing person.

West Cliff Drive,
Santa Cruz N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCFD
119 5/2/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
California Highway Patrol
(“CHP”) Felony suspect fled on foot.

South Green Valley
Road, Watsonville N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with CHP
120 5/2/25 Locate fleeing
suspect CHP Felony suspect fled on foot.

Riverside Road,
Watsonville N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with CHP
121 4/29/25 Crime in
progress
No Assault with a deadly weapon
/ firearm.

Chestnut Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No

19.26 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
15 122 4/26/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Assault with a deadly weapon
/ knife.

River Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
123 4/5/25 Lost or missing
person
No Search for missing person.
1 Municipal Wharf,
Santa Cruz N/A No
124 4/4/25 Search warrant No Felony arrest warrant
operation.

Delaware Avenue,
Santa Cruz N/A No
125 3/31/25 Traffic collision
documentation No Traffic collision scene documentation.

River Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
126 3/2/25
Search and
rescue/Water
rescue
SCFD Water rescue operation.

West Cliff Drive,
Santa Cruz N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCFD
127 3/20/25 Crime in
progress
No Residential burglary in
progress.

Campbell Street,
Santa Cruz N/A No
128 3/8/25 Search warrant No Arrest warrant service
operation.

Elm Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
129 3/5/25 Crime in
progress
No Gunshots heard in the area.

Shaffer Road, Santa
Cruz N/A No
130 2/22/25 Crime in
progress
No Residential burglary in
progress.

Nobel Drive, Santa
Cruz N/A No
131 2/20/25 Traffic collision
documentation No Traffic collision scene documentation.

Cabrillo Highway,
Santa Cruz N/A No

19.27 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
16 132 2/10/25 Crime in
progress
No Brandishing of a firearm.

Barson Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
133 1/25/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No
Felony crime suspect fled the
area. (SCSO also used their
interior drone.)
Delaware Avenue,
Santa Cruz N/A No
134 1/16/25 Locate fleeing
suspect SCSO Felony crime suspect fled the area.
7th Avenue, Santa
Cruz N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCSO
135 1/15/25 Locate fleeing
suspect
No Felony crime suspect fled the
area.

Harvey West
Boulevard, Santa Cruz N/A No
136 1/15/25 Crime in
progress
No Residential burglary in
progress.

Anna Street,
Watsonville N/A No
137 1/13/25 Crime in
progress
No Residential burglary in
progress.

Barson Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No
138 1/13/25 Crime in
progress
No Subject in possession of a
firearm.

Tannery Arts Center,
Santa Cruz N/A No
139 1/8/25 Department
training No Department training. Boardwalk, Santa Cruz N/A No 140 1/8/25 Department
training No Department training.

East Cliff Drive, Santa
Cruz N/A No
141 1/7/25 Department
training No Department training.

Frederick Street, Santa
Cruz N/A No

19.28 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
17 142 1/5/25 Crime in
progress
SCSO Commercial burglary in
progress.

Soquel Avenue, Santa
Cruz N/A
No audit
Shared incident data
with SCSO
Intended Acquisition in 2026
The Department acquired two (2) additional X10 UAS units in February 2026 as per Santa Cruz City Council approval on February 13, 2024. Pending Council approval, the Department intends on purchasing two (2) R10 UAS units.

Total Annual Cost
Software and hardware ($21,424.12).

Training personnel costs ($45,176.83).

Annual costs for personnel, transportation, and storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget.

19.29 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
18 CATEGORY 2&3 / Armored PersonnelCarrier
Inventory
Lenco Armored Rescue Vehicle (ARV); Quantity: 1
Use Reporting
Use
Number Date Incident
Type
Agency
Assist? Use Summary ComplaintSummary Audit
1 1/15/25 Barricaded
subject WPD
The ARV was used to assist WPD in detaining a subject who was alleged to have committed a residential burglary and then broken into and barricaded himself in another residence.

N/A N/A
2 1/16/25 Fuel N/A The ARV taken to the City Corporation Yard for fuel. N/A N/A 3 2/5/25 Maintenance N/A The ARV was taken to the City Corporation Yard to have a battery replaced.

N/A N/A
4 4/2/25 High risk
warrant service WPD
The ARV was used to serve a high-risk warrant in the city of Greenfield at the request of WPD. Warrants were related to homicides. SCPD officers drove the ARV.

N/A N/A
5 4/13/25 Fuel N/A The ARV was taken to the City Corporation Yard for fuel. N/A N/A 6 5/1/25 Department
event N/A The ARV was used during the production of a Department recruiting video.

N/A N/A
7 5/2/25 High risk
warrant service
Reno Police
Department
The ARV was used in the arrest of a subject wanted for a homicide committed in Reno, Nevada. The suspect was located in Santa Cruz County at the time of the arrest.

N/A N/A
8 5/14/25 Training N/A The ARV was taken to the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s range for Department training.

N/A N/A

19.30 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
19 9 5/21/25 Training N/A The ARV was taken to the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s range for Department training.

N/A N/A
10 7/27/25 Security
deployment N/A The ARV was deployed in support of a security operation for the Wharf to Wharf event N/A N/A
11 10/15/25 Warrant
service WPD
The ARV was used in the service of a high-risk warrant for an attempted murder in the city of Watsonville. N/A N/A
Intended Acquisition in 2026
The Department does not intend to acquire additional armored personnel carriers in 2026.

Total Annual Cost
Parts and labor costs ($1,451.93).

Refuel costs ($331.96).

Annual costs for personnel, training, and storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget.

19.31 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
20 CATEGORY 5 / Transport Vehicles
Inventory1
2008 Ford F350 Transport Vehicle; Quantity: 1
Use Reporting
Use
Number
Date Incident
Type
Agency
Assist? Use Summary ComplaintSummary Audit

N/A N/A N/A N/A
This vehicle is used as a transport vehicle
for all manner of Department activities and
transports personnel and equipment for
training and law enforcement operations.

N/A N/A
Intended Acquisition in 2026
The Department does not intend to acquire a new transport vehicle in 2026.

Total Annual Cost
Parts and labor costs ($480.00).

Fuel costs ($366.66).

Annual costs for personnel, training, and storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget.

1 Use of this vehicle is not tracked or categorized every time it is used.

19.32 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
21 CATEGORY 5 / Command & Control Vehicles
Inventory
2018 Chevy Tahoe Patrol Vehicle; Quantity: 1 2018 Dodge Charger; Quantity: 1 2022 Ford Explorer; Quantity: 2 2019 Chevy Tahoe Patrol Vehicle; Quantity: 2 2021 Ford Explorer; Quantity: 1 2022 Ford Explorer (UAS); Quantity: 2 Use Reporting
Use
Number Date IncidentType
Agency
Assist? Use Summary ComplaintSummary Audit

N/A N/A N/A N/A
These vehicles are patrol vehicles assigned
to the Sergeants and Lieutenants. In addition
to their use during calls for service, they
would operate as a command/and/control
vehicle if the situation required it.

N/A N/A
Intended Acquisition in 2026
Any acquisition of new command and control vehicles will comply with established City protocol.

Total Annual Cost
2018 Chevy Tahoe: Parts and labor costs ($7,770.19); Fuel costs ($2,331.53). 2019 Chevy Tahoe: Parts and labor costs ($3,790.42); Fuel costs ($4,976.57). 2019 Chevy Tahoe: Parts and labor costs ($29,240.57); Fuel costs ($4,375.00). 2021 Ford Explorer: Parts and labor costs ($1,064.56); Fuel costs ($358.99). 2022 Ford Explorer: Parts and labor costs ($9,779.37); Fuel costs ($2,520.04). 2022 Ford Explorer: Parts and labor costs ($1,982.61); Fuel costs ($806.36). 2018 Dodge Charger: Parts and labor costs ($804.50); Fuel costs ($466.09). 2022 Ford Explorer (UAS): Parts and labor costs ($10,895.92); Fuel costs ($4,495.82). 2022 Ford Explorer (UAS): Parts and labor costs ($1,084.74); Fuel costs ($1,344.14).

Annual costs for personnel, training, and storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget.

19.33 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
22 CATEGORY 8 / Firearms Greater than .50 Caliber
Inventory
Mossberg 590 12 Gauge Pump Action Shotguns; Quantity: 2 Remington 870 12 Gauge Pump Action Chemical Agent Launching Shotgun; Quantity 1 Use Reporting
Use
Number Date
Incident
Type
Agency
Assist? Use Summary
Complaint
Summary Audit
N/A N/A N/A N/A The Breaching Shotguns were not used during the reporting period. N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A The Chemical Agent Launching Shotgun was not used during the reporting period. N/A N/A
Intended Acquisition in 2026
The Department does not intend to acquire additional firearms greater than .50 caliber in 2026.

Total Annual Cost
Annual costs for storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget.

19.34 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
23 CATEGORY 9 / Ammunition of .50 Caliber or Greater
Inventory2

12. Gauge launching Cartridges Defense Technologies Part Number 1210; Quantity:55 Use Reporting
Use
Number Date
Incident
Type
Agency
Assist? Use Summary
Complaint
Summary Audit
N/A N/A N/A N/A No breaching ammunition was used during the reporting period. N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A No launching cartridges were used during the reporting period. N/A N/A
Intended Acquisition in 2026
The Department does not intend to acquire ammunition of .50 caliber or greater in 2026.

Total Annual Cost
Annual costs for storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget. 2 The inventory of consumable equipment such as ammunition, diversionary devices, chemical agents, etc. may fluctuate throughout the year due to operational usage, training usage, operational wear, and/or manufacturer recommended replacement guidelines. Quantities provided represent quantity possessed by Department as of the time of issuing this Annual Report.

19.35 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
24 CATEGORY 10 / Specialized Firearms & Ammunition of less than .50 Caliber Inventory3
Defiance Bolt Action Precision Rifle; Quantity: 3
Accuracy International AT Series Bolt Action Rifle; Quantity:1 Hornady .308 155 Grain ELD Match TAP Ammunition; Quantity: 1,600 Use Reporting
Use
Number Date IncidentType
Agency
Assist? Use Summary
Complaint
Summary Audit
N/A 2025 N/A N/A No Precision Rifles were used outside of training purposes.

N/A N/A
1 2025 Training N/A Precision Rifles used monthly during the year for mandated training. N/A N/A
Intended Acquisition in 2026
The Department does not intend to acquire additional specialized firearms in 2026.

Consumable equipment acquisitions for 2026 will restore quantities previously approved by the City Council.

Total Annual Cost
Hornady .308 155 Grain ELD Match TAP Ammunition purchased 8/7/25; Quantity 2,000: ($2,853.00).

Defiance Bolt Action Precision rifles were re/barreled in 2025, total cost ($3,870.35) Accuracy International Precision Rifle was re/barreled in 2025, total cost ($1,110.00) Precision rifle Peace Officer Standards and Training mandated monthly training ($28,016.64). 3 The inventory of consumable equipment such as ammunition, diversionary devices, chemical agents, etc. may fluctuate throughout the year due to operational usage, training usage, operational wear, and/or manufacturer recommended replacement guidelines. Quantities provided represent quantity possessed by Department as of the time of issuing this Annual Report.

19.36 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
25 Annual costs for personnel, transportation, and storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget.

19.37 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
26 CATEGORY 12 / Flashbang, Teargas & Pepper Balls
Inventory4
892NR 12 Gram Low Roll NFDD; Quantity: 49
7007 4 Gram NFDD Training Reloads; Quantity: 22
1090 Stinger Grenades; Quantity: 0
1082 Riot Control CS Canister; Quantity: 12
1032 Tri/Chamber Flameless CS canister; Quantity: 14
5230B Baffled Launchable CS canister; Quantity: 10
126 Triple Chaser Separating Canister; Quantity: 10
56854 Aerosol OC Fogger; Quantity: 7
2260 40mm OC Liquid Ferret Projectile; Quantity: 0
2262 40mm CS Liquid Ferret Projectile; Quantity: 53
Pepper Ball Guns; Quantity: 4
Pepper Balls; Quantity: 4 (containers of 375 pepper balls) (expired) Use Reporting
Use
Number Date
Incident
Type
Agency
Assist? Use Summary
Complaint
Summary Audit
1 N/A N/A N/A
No chemical agent munitions were used outside of
training during the reporting period.

N/A N/A
2 4/2/25 Training N/A CS canisters used in Emergency Service Unit training. N/A N/A 3 4/2/25 Training N/A
Stinger Grenades used in monthly Emergency Service
Unit training.

N/A N/A
4 4/2/25 Training N/A
Triple Chaser munitions used in monthly Emergency
Service Unit training.

N/A N/A
4 The inventory of consumable equipment, such as ammunition, diversionary devices, chemical agents, etc., may fluctuate throughout the year due to operational usage, training usage, operational wear, and/or manufacturer/recommended replacement guidelines. Quantities provided represent quantities possessed by the Department as of the time of issuing this Annual Report

19.38 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
27 Intended Acquisition in 2026
Consumable equipment acquisitions for 2026 will restore quantities previously approved by the City Council.

Total Annual Cost
Training personnel costs ($9,338.88).

Annual costs for personnel, transportation, and storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget.

19.39 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
28 CATEGORY 13 / Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD)
Inventory
GENASYS Inc. LRAD/100X; Quantity: 1
Use Reporting
Use
Number Date
Incident
Type
Agency
Assist? Use Summary
Complaint
Summary Audit
N/A N/A N/A N/A The LRAD was not used during the reporting period. N/A N/A Intended Acquisition in 2026
The Department does not intend to acquire additional long-range acoustic devices in 2026.

Total Annual Cost
Annual costs for storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget.

19.40 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
29 CATEGORY 14 / 40mm Projectile Launchers
Inventory
Defense Technologies DT1325 40mm/Single Barrel Launchers; Quantity: 14 Lewis Machine and Tool 1425 40mm/Single Barrel Launchers; Quantity: 15 Lewis Machine and Tool 1440 40mm/4/shot Multi/Launchers; Quantity: 2 Penn Arms PGL65/40 40mm/ 6 shot Multi/Launcher; Quantity: 1 Use Reporting
Use
Number Date
Incident
Type Agency Assist? Use Summary
Complaint
Summary Audit
N/A N/A Training N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launchers were used for
ongoing training and qualifications during the
reporting period.

N/A N/A
1 1/25/25 Domestic violence N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
investigation of a domestic violence incident.

Nine (9) eXact impact rounds used to break a
window for a drone.

N/A N/A
2 2/6/25 Stolen vehicle N/A 40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the contact of a reported stolen vehicle.

N/A N/A
3 2/26/25 Brandishing of a
firearm N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
arrest of a subject. An illegal firearm was
recovered.

N/A N/A

19.41 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
30 4 3/6/25 Brandishing of a
weapon
N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
contact and arrest of subject armed with a knife
who had also made criminal threats.

N/A N/A
5 3/21/25 Burglary N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
investigation of a burglary of an occupied
residence.

N/A N/A
6 3/25/25 Brandishing of a
weapon
N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
contact and detention of a subject armed with a
knife.

N/A N/A
7 4/4/25 Gang activity N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during a
vehicle stop of subject involved in gang activity
and resisting arrest.

N/A N/A
8 4/4/25 Disturbance N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
arrest of a subject who had an outstanding felony
warrant for elder abuse.

N/A N/A
9 4/18/25 Disturbance N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed while
contacting a subject in a theater threating gun
violence.

N/A N/A
10 4/29/25 Firearm possession N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed while
contacting a subject seen with a firearm (later
determined to be a pellet gun).

N/A N/A
11 5/8/25 Prowling N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
contact and detention of a subject prowling at a
residence.

N/A N/A

19.42 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
31 12 5/16/25 Criminal threats N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
arrest of a subject who committed criminal threats
using a firearm.

N/A N/A
13 5/25/25 Vehicle pursuit CHP 40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the detention of subject pursued by CHP.

N/A N/A
14 5/28/25 Assault with a
deadly weapon N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
arrest of a subject in possession of a machete
during an assault.

N/A N/A
15 6/12/25 Assault with a
deadly weapon
N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
arrest of a subject wanted for committing an
assault with a deadly weapon.

N/A N/A
16 6/26/25 Brandishing of a
firearm N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
detention of a subject reported to have brandished
a firearm.

N/A N/A
17 7/10/25 Firearm possession N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
search for subject reported to be in possession of a
firearm.

N/A N/A
18 8/5/25 Firearm possession N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
contact and detention of a subject reported to be
in possession of a firearm.

N/A N/A
19 8/13/25 Mental health
crisis N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed while
contacting a subject who self-reported being in
possession of a firearm and being in crisis.

N/A N/A
20 9/4/25 Subject with a
knife N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
detention of a subject armed with a knife during a
mental health crisis.

N/A N/A

19.43 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
32 21 9/22/25 Subject with a
knife N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
contact of a subject armed with pepper spray and
a knife during a mental health crisis.

N/A N/A
22 9/23/25 Subject with a
firearm N/A
40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during the
contact of a subject reported to be armed with a
firearm.

N/A N/A
23 10/05/25 Wanted Subject N/A
A 40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during
the contact and arrest of a subject known to be
violent with officers.

N/A N/A
24 10/17/25 Residential
burglary N/A
A 40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during
the search of a residence believed to have been
broken into.

N/A N/A
25 10/20/25 Brandishing of a
knife N/A
A 40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during
the contact and arrest of a subject who had
brandished a knife.

N/A N/A
26 11/1/25 Trespassing N/A
A 40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during
the contact and the arrest of a subject trespassing,
who then resisted arrest.

N/A N/A
27 11/12/25 Burglary N/A
A 40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during
the arrest of a subject who had broken into a
residence.

N/A N/A
28 11/25/25 Disturbance N/A
A 40mm Less Lethal Launcher displayed during
the detention of a subject who had reportedly
struck a person with a vehicle.

N/A N/A
Intended Acquisition in 2026
The Department does not intend to acquire additional 40mm launchers in 2026.

19.44 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
33 Total Annual Cost
Training personnel costs ($4,669.44).

Annual costs for personnel, transportation, and storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget.

19.45 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
34 CATEGORY 14 / 40mm Ammunition
Inventory5
eXact Impact 40mm; Quantity 126
Direct Impact 40mm OC; Quantity:20
Direct Impact Marking; Quantity 53
Training Sponge Ammunition 24 Round Kit; Quantity: 5 complete, 2 partial Use Reporting
Use
Number Date
Incident
Type
Agency
Assist? Use Summary Complaint
Summary Audit

N/A N/A N/A N/A
40mm ammunition and 40mm training
ammunition used in training during the
reporting period.

N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A
No Direct Impact 40mm OC, Direct Impact
Markings were used during the reporting
period.

N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A
See CATEGORY 14 / 40mm Projectile
Launchers Use Reporting Summary above for
summary of use of eXact Impact 40mm
ammunition.

N/A N/A
5 The inventory of consumable equipment such as ammunition, diversionary devices, chemical agents, etc. may fluctuate throughout the year due to operational usage, training usage, operational wear, and/or manufacturer recommended replacement guidelines. Quantities provided represent quantity possessed by Department as of the time of issuing this Annual Report.

19.46 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
35 Intended Acquisition in 2026
Consumable equipment acquisitions for 2026 will restore quantities previously approved by the City Council.

Total Annual Cost
No 40mm eXact impact ammunition was purchased in 2025.

No 40mm training ammunition kits were purchased in 2025.

Annual costs for personnel, transportation, and storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget.

19.47 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
36 CATEGORY 15 / Other Specified Items/Equipment
Inventory6
Colt LE6920 Carbines; Quantity: 33
Colt Sporter Carbines; Quantity: 2
LMT Defender 2000 Carbines; Quantity: 35
Hornady 5.56x45mm NATO, 75/grain BTHP TAP; Quantity: 2

0.223/5.56x45 Training Ammunition7; Quantity: 38,500
Use Reporting
Use
Number Date
Incident
Type
Agency
Assist? Use Summary
Complaint
Summary
Audit

N/A N/A N/A N/A
No AR/15 patrol rifles were used in lethal force
situations during the reporting period. N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A
Duty ammunition used in ongoing accuracy
verification and maintenance of the rifles during the
reporting period.

N/A N/A
N/A Monthly N/A N/A Monthly Emergency Services Unit training. Live fire used in 25% of the trainings. N/A N/A
6 The inventory of consumable equipment, such as ammunition, diversionary devices, chemical agents, etc., may fluctuate throughout the year due to operational usage, training usage, operational wear, and/or manufacturer/recommended replacement guidelines. The quantities provided represent the quantity possessed by the Department as of the time of issuing this Annual Report.
7 The Department's standard training round is .223/5.56 55/grain full metal jacket. The manufacturer of the ammunition varies depending on what is available when the Department needs to make an order.

19.48 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
37 1 1/15/25 Barricaded
subject WPD
AR-15 patrol rifles displayed during an operation
where the Emergency Services Unit team assisted
WPD with a barricaded subject alleged to have
committed a residential burglary.

N/A N/A
2 1/30/25 Training N/A AR-15 patrol rifles used during the 16-hour mandatory Peace Officer Standards and Training. N/A N/A 3 2/22/25 Training N/A AR-15 patrol rifles used during the 16-hour mandatory Peace Officer Standards and Training. N/A N/A 4 4/4/25 Disturbance N/A
AR-15 patrol rifle displayed during the arrest of a
subject with outstanding felony warrant for elder
abuse.

N/A N/A
5 4/29/25 Firearm
possession N/A
AR-15 patrol rifle displayed during contact with a
subject reported to be in possession of a firearm and
involved in gang activity.

N/A N/A
6 5/2/25 Homicide
warrant
Reno Police
Department
AR-15 patrol rifles displayed when the Emergency
Services Unit team was deployed to arrest a subject
wanted for homicide committed in Reno, NV.

N/A N/A
7 5/14/21 Training N/A AR-15 patrol rifles used during Department firearms training and qualification. N/A N/A

19.49 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
38 8 5/16/25 Criminal
threats N/A AR-15 patrol rifle displayed during a response to a call of a subject threatening to shoot another person. N/A N/A 9 5/18/25
Assault
with a
deadly
weapon
N/A
AR-15 patrol rifles displayed during contact and
arrest of a subject who allegedly pistol whipped
another person, a firearm was recovered while
responding to the incident.

N/A N/A
10 5/21/25 Training N/A AR-15 patrol rifles used during Department firearms training and qualifications. N/A N/A
11 6/26/25
Brandishing
of a firearm N/A
AR-15 patrol rifles displayed during contact and
detention of a subject who had allegedly brandished
a firearm after exiting a metro bus.

N/A N/A
12 7/10/25
Possession
of a firearm N/A
AR-15 patrol rifles displayed during response to
report of a known prohibited person in possession of
a firearm.

N/A N/A
13 8/18/25 Training N/A AR-15 patrol rifles used during the 16-hour mandatory Peace Officer Standards and Training. N/A N/A 14 10/17/25 Residential
burglary N/A AR-15 Patrol rifles displayed during response to a burglary of a private residence. N/A N/A

19.50 Santa Cruz Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
2025 Report
39 15 11/10/25 Training N/A AR-15 patrol rifles used during the 16-hour mandatory Peace Officer Standards and Training. N/A N/A 16 11/25/25
Assault
with a
deadly
weapon
N/A
AR-15 Patrol rifles displayed during arrest of a
subject who allegedly committed an assault with a
deadly weapon via vehicle.

N/A N/A
Intended Acquisition in 2026
The Department does not intend to acquire additional AR-15 patrol rifles in 2026.

Consumable equipment acquisitions for 2026 will restore quantities previously approved by the City Council.

Total Annual Cost
Ammunition cost ($8,504.00).

Miscellaneous parts cost ($730.47).

Department wide firearms training personnel cost ($23,347.20).

Emergency Services Unit Tactical Team training personnel costs (approximately $28,016.64).

Colt Armorers Training (approximately $3,630.00).

Annual costs for personnel, transportation, and storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget.

19.51 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 1
Military Equipment
705.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of military equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
705.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):

Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Department.

Military equipment – Includes but is not limited to the following:
 Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles.  Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers.  High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached.  Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants.  Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.  Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind.  Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
 Firearms and ammunition of_.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
 Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than_.50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code §30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.
 Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.  Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools.  Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
 TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs).

Policy
705

19.52 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 2
 Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
 Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
705.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Santa Cruz Police Department that, with respect to military equipment, members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071, Penal Code § 13652 (AB 48), City of Santa Cruz Resolution No. NS-29,862, and Council Policy No. 29-16.
705.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of this department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of Santa Cruz Police Department (Government Code § 7071). e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department’s funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner.
705.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying equipment for the Department:

See attachment: 2026 03 Santa Cruz Police AB 481 Equipment List_FINAL.pdf

19.53 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 3
705.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the governing body by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the governing body and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The military equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):
a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.
f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. 705.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Absent exigent circumstances, as further discussed in Section 705.10, military equipment should not be used by any other law enforcement agency or member in this jurisdiction unless the military equipment is approved for use in accordance with this policy. 705.7 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the governing body for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).

The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in department inventory.

19.54 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 4
705.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.
705.9 PUBLIC SUBMITTAL OF COMPLAINTS, CONCERNS AND/OR QUESTIONS Any member of the public wishing to submit a complaint, concern, or question regarding the Department's use of each specific type of military equipment, should contact the Department's Professional Standards Unit, call (831) 420-5800, or visit the Department's website at https:// www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-departments/police and select the "Community Feed Back Form." Complaints, concerns, or questions can be submitted in any form (i.e., in person, telephone, email, etc.). The Department will work diligently to timely respond to the public submittal of complaints, concerns, and/or questions regarding the Department's use of each specific type of military equipment.
705.10 USE IN EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES
In exigent circumstances and with the approval of the Chief of Police or his/her designee, the Police Department may utilize military equipment that is not included in this policy to promote the safety and security of community members. If the Department utilizes military equipment not included in this policy in such exigent circumstances, it must take all of the following actions:
 The Chief of Police or his/her designee shall notify the City Manager or his/her designee of said use as soon as circumstantially feasible.
 Immediately cease use of the military equipment once the exigent circumstances necessitating such use cease to exist.
 Report to Council information about the use and the military equipment used, consistent with Government Code section 7072, within 30 days of the use of the military equipment.

19.55 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 5
Santa Cruz Police Department Military Use Equipment List Pursuant to AB481.

1. Robot (Category 1)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

I. Recon Robotics “Throw bot.” Purchase cost: $9,000 in 2013. Quantity: 1.

This equipment is a battery powered, remote operated device. It is equipped with a color camera as well as infrared capabilities that allow for use in low or no light situations. It does not have audio capabilities, nor is it capable of creating audio or video recordings. The Throw Bot is designed to be carried and operated by one person and can be thrown a significant distance without damage. It cannot traverse stairs on its own and it does not have any arm, claw or other type of manipulation attachment. The Throw Bot has no ability to have a weapon or other device affixed to it, nor is the Throw Bot capable of delivering a weapon or other device. This equipment is for use during high-risk incidents or incidents where its use may enhance officer or civilian safety. These include but are not limited to:
a high-risk search warrant, barricaded subject or hostage negotiation/rescue. This equipment can provide officers with the location of a subject inside of a structure or room. It can assist officers in locating suspects, determining whether the suspect armed, and can provide the locations of injured persons or hostages. This equipment can provide critical tactical information without placing officers at undue risk. This equipment has been used in numerous high risk and dangerous incidents.

II. Recon Robotics “Throw bot 2.” Purchase cost: $16,270. Quantity: 1. This equipment is a battery powered, remote operated device. It is equipped with a color camera as well as infrared capabilities that allow for use in low or no light situations. It is capable of one-way audio (Listening only). The audio and video captured by the Throw Bot 2 can be recorded onto an SD card via the remote device. The Throw Bot 2 is designed to be carried and operated by one person and can be thrown a significant distance without damage. It cannot traverse stairs on its own and it does not have any arm, claw, or other type of manipulation attachment. The Throw Bot 2 has no ability to have a weapon or other device affixed to it, the Throw Bot 2 is incapable of delivering a weapon or other device. This equipment is for use during high-risk incidents or incidents where its use may enhance officer or civilian safety. These include but are not limited to: a high-risk search warrant, barricaded subject or hostage negotiation/rescue. This equipment can provide officers with the location of a subject inside of a structure or room. It can assist officers in locating suspects, determining whether the suspect is armed, and can provide the locations of injured persons or hostages. This equipment can provide critical tactical information without placing officers at undue risk. This equipment has been used in numerous high risk and dangerous incidents.

III. AVITAR II by Robotex. SCPD has access to two AVITAR II robots maintained by the Santa Cruz Sheriff’s Office. The AVITAR II is a heavyduty robot, controlled by remote operation with a camera attachment owned by the Santa Cruz Sheriff’s Office.
b. Purpose:

19.56 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 6
To be used to remotely search areas and gain visual data. c. Authorized Use:

The SCPD Emergency Service Unit (ESU) Tactical team has primary control over the Throw Bot. It is available for use by any SCPD officer in any situation where it would enhance officer or civilian safety. The AVITAR II Robots are entirely owned and operated by Santa Cruz Sheriff’s Office personnel. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable SCPD policies, including but not limited to, Search and Seizure312, Missing Persons-316, Emergency Services Unit-404 and Recordings 426.5.

Any use of SCPD robots will be for official law enforcement purposes, pursuant to State and Federal law, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community.
e. Required Training:

I. The SCPD conducts department specified training for personnel to use the Throw Bot. This includes set up, deployment, safe and effective use of the Throw Bot and Throw Bot 2. This includes set up, deployment, safe and effective use of the Throw Bots.

II. Training required for the use of the AVITAR II robots is in accordance with the Santa Cruz County Sherriff’s policy.
f. Expected Lifespan:

I. Throw Bot: The Throw Bot is designed to be in service 8-10 years. The Throw Bot will be used until repairs are no longer supported by the manufacturer, the Throw Bot has been in service since 2013. It has been repaired by the manufacturer once.

II. Throw Bot 2: The Throw Bot 2 is designed to be in service 8-10 years.

The Throw Bot 2 is covered under the manufacturer’s warranty for one year. Once the warranty expires any repairs required will be done by the manufacturer at SCPD’s cost.

III. AVITAR II: Not a consideration for SCPD.
g. Fiscal Impact
I. Throw Bot: No known annual maintenance costs.

II. Throw Bot 2: $16,270 (Homeland Security grant funded). No known annual maintenance costs.

III. AVITAR II: No fiscal impact for SCPD.

2. Unmanned Aerial Systems UAS (Category 1)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

I. Skydio Drone X10 Unmanned Aerial Drone with Skydio, spare propellers and batteries, NightSense, Visible Light for X10, Skydio Spotlight for X10, and Skydio Speaker/Mic for X10, 5G Connectivity. Purchase cost:
$21,706.88 each. Quantity sought: 5. This equipment is a batterypowered remote operated Unmanned Aerial Drone. It is equipped with a camera that is capable of audio and video recording. The camera has low light capabilities and can be used in darkness. The camera has thermal capabilities, meaning that it can detect heat signatures of substances, objects, or persons that are warmer than their surrounding environment.

The camera has zoom capabilities that enable it to read the license plate

19.57 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 7
of a vehicle up to 800 yards away. The drone is capable of mapping crime scenes and major collisions scenes. When used in conjunction with software, 3 dimensional renderings of these scenes can be created for investigative purposes. The UAS has a 40-minute flight time per battery, it can fly at speeds of up to 45 miles per hour and it can be deployed by a trained operator in less than 40 seconds. The UAS cannot be weaponized and is not designed to carry or deploy any type of weapon or device. While versions of the UAS software has facial recognition capacities, the UAS will not be used for facial recognition and the Department will not purchase software that supports facial recognition.

II. Skydio Drone R10 Unmanned Aerial Drone with Skydio, designed for indoor and confined-space operations, batteries, 5G Connectivity, obstacle avoidance, onboard LED lighting, two-way audio, livestreaming, and NightSense. Purchase cost: $ 4,998 each. Quantity sought: 2. This equipment is a battery-powered remote operated Unmanned Aerial Drone.

It is equipped with a camera that is capable of audio and video recording.

The camera has low light capabilities and can be used in darkness. The UAS has a 20-minute flight time per battery, it has a maximum perch time of 3-hours, it can fly at horizontal speeds of up to 27 miles per hour. The UAS cannot be weaponized and is not designed to carry or deploy any type of weapon or device. The UAS has no facial recognition capabilities, it will not be used for facial recognition, and the Department will not purchase software that supports facial recognition.
b. Purpose
To support authorized law enforcement activity by providing aerial visual and audio capabilities.
c. Authorized Use:

Only officers who are licensed and have completed the required training may deploy and operate the UAS. The UAS will be operated in compliance with all applicable local, State and Federal laws and in accordance with constitutional and privacy rights. Authorized uses of the UAS include, but are not limited to, the following:

I. Public safety emergency
II. Search and Rescue/Water Rescue
III. Lost or missing persons
IV. Investigation of suspicious or explosive devices
V. Natural disaster response and management
VI. Crime scene documentation (X10 UAS only)
VII. Traffic collision documentation (X10 UAS only)
VIII. Recovery of decedent
IX. Qualifying law enforcement or fire department mutual aid X. Pursuant to a valid search and/or arrest warrant
XI. To assist in the service of a valid search and/or arrest warrant XII. Crime in progress
XIII. Locating a fleeing suspect (X10 UAS only)

19.58 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 8
XIV. Departmental videos including but not limited to recruitment and public relations
XV. Educational demonstrations
XVI. Department training
d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable SCPD policies, including but not limited to, Unmanned Aerial System607, Search and Seizure-312, Missing Persons-316, Emergency Services Unit-404 and Recordings 426.5; Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 9.85. Use of UAS will be for official law enforcement purposes, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to local, State and Federal law, and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations.
e. Required Training:

The Department will maintain a current FAA Certificate of Waiver or Authorization.

All operators must be licensed pursuant to FAA Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate.

All UAS operators will complete additional training as may be required by department policy and/or State and Federal regulations. f. Expected Lifespan:

I. Skydio Drone X10: Each UAS has a 1-year limited manufacturer’s warranty. The Department will purchase an additional 3-year care package for each UAS. This provides for one non-cost replacement of an inoperable UAS and reduced costs for any subsequent replacements.

The Department intends to operate these UAS until they become obsolete and are no longer supported by the manufacturer.

II. Skydio Drone R10: Each UAS has a 1-year limited manufacturer’s warranty. The Department will purchase an additional 3-year care package for each UAS. This provides for one non-cost replacement of an inoperable UAS and reduced costs for any subsequent replacements.

The Department intends to operate these UAS until they become obsolete and are no longer supported by the manufacturer. g. Fiscal Impact
I. Skydio Drone X10: The Department will be required to modify two marked SCPD vehicles with specific equipment to operate the UAS. This equipment will be used to store and transport drones, display monitors, power inverter systems, spare batteries, and solar charging equipment.

The estimated purchase and installation cost for this equipment is $27,708.

In addition to the purchase cost of the UAS, and operational equipment, the Department will purchase software and licensing. These costs are estimated at $80,516.45 over the course of five years and include the software required to operate the UAS and to integrate the UAS with the Department’s Axon evidence system.

Initial training costs for the first year are estimated at $6,926 and will include all required training and licensing costs for the UAS operators, including FAA licensing.

19.59 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 9
The Department will also purchase warranty and support service subscriptions over the course of five years for a total of $26,245.

II. Skydio Drone R10: The Department will utilize existing modified marked SCPD vehicles with specific equipment to operate the UAS. This equipment will be used to store and transport drones, display monitors, power inverter systems, spare batteries, and solar charging equipment.

In addition to the purchase cost of the UAS and operational equipment, the Department will purchase software and licensing. These costs are estimated at $18,011 over the course of five years and include the software required to operate the UAS and to integrate the UAS with the Department’s Axon evidence system.

Initial training costs for the first year are estimated at $1,366 and will include all required training and licensing costs for the UAS operators, including FAA licensing.

The Department will also purchase warranty and support service subscriptions over the course of five years for a total of $6,168.

3. Armored Personnel Carrier, vehicle with entry apparatus attached (Category 2&3) a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

Lenco Armored Rescue Vehicle (ARV). Purchase cost $230,378. Quantity: 1. The ARV is designed to provide ballistic protection during tactical events, and is designed to withstand multiple bullet strikes from small arms fire and low level explosions. The ARV is equipped with remote operated spotlights, emergency lights, siren and a public address system. Common uses for the ARV include citizen and officer rescues, evacuations and the deployment of officers and chemical munitions. The ARV has been used in numerous high-risk and critical incidents including use by allied agencies in Santa Clara County, Santa Cruz County and San Mateo County.
b. Purpose:

To be used in response to high-risk or critical incidents to enhance officer and community safety, assist in scene containment and to assist in resolving critical incidents.
c. Authorized Use:

Only the Watch Commander or the ESU commander may authorize the use of the ARV. Deployment must be based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident. The ARV was purchased through a BUASI grant. The terms of this grant require that SCPD make the ARV available to any allied agency with the BUASI area as long as the situation the ARV is requested for meets the criteria for deployment set forth in SCPD Policy 702. SCPD generally sends at least one member of the ESU tactical team with the ARV if one is available. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable SCPD policies including but not limited to Vehicle Use -702, ESU Tactical Team-404. It is the policy of the Department to utilize armored vehicles

19.60 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 10
only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law.
e. Required Training:

Members of the ESU team train officers in the use of the ARV. This training includes capabilities of the ARV, safety considerations, conducting civilian and officer rescues as well as other deployment considerations. f. Expected Lifespan:
20 years.
g. Fiscal Impact
$4,312 per year (parts, labor, and fuel).

4. Ford F350 transport vehicle (ESU Truck, category 5)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost. 2008 Ford F350 transport vehicle. A standard Ford F350 truck chassis with a large box type compartment attached to the chassis from the cab back. Purchase cost: $65,000. Quantity: 1. The interior of the compartment is fitted with shelving and seats. The outsides of the compartment are fitted with multiple storage boxes.

The vehicle contains various equipment, spare ballistic shields, breeching tools, small tools, medical supplies, pens, writing tablets, power inverters etc. b. Purpose:

The Ford F350 is deployed during critical incidents or any other instance where it can be utilized to transport personnel and equipment.
c. Authorized Use:

Any member of the SCPD is authorized to drive the vehicle if directed to do so.

The vehicle is used primarily by the ESU team.
d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable SCPD policies including but not limited to Vehicle Use -702 and Emergency Services Unit-404. It is the policy of the SCPD to use the vehicle only for official law enforcement purposes, and in accordance with California State law regarding the operation of motor vehicles.
e. Required Training:

All driver/operators shall receive training in the safe operation of the vehicle. f. Expected lifespan:
20 Years.
g. Fiscal Impact:
$1,158 per year (parts, labor, and fuel).

5. Command and Control Vehicles (Category 5)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

Chevy Tahoe Patrol Vehicle. Purchase cost: $60,000 each.

Quantity: (1) 2017 Model (Lieutenant), (3) 2018 models (Sergeants). These vehicles can act as a Mobile Command Center. The vehicle is equipped with file cabinets, dry erase board, medical supplies and additional mapping equipment. b. Purpose:

The Mobile Command Center is commonly utilized during incidents which involve the use of the Incident Command System (ICS). The Mobile Command Center assists with creating a set of objectives and overall goals, developing appropriate

19.61 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 11
tactics, ensuring the allocation of appropriate resources, reviewing plans, communicating goals, tactics, expectations, and establishing accountability. c. Authorized Use:

The Mobile Command Center is used when deemed appropriate by the field supervisor or Watch Commander.
d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable SCPD policies including but not limited to Vehicle Use -702. It is the policy of the SCPD to use the vehicle only for official law enforcement purposes, and in accordance with California State law regarding the operation of motor vehicles.
e. Required Training:

All driver/operators shall receive training in the safe operation of the vehicle. f. Expected Lifespan:

I. Chevy Patrol Vehicle: 10 years.

II. The Mobile Command Center does not have a minimum or maximum lifespan and can be transferred to other vehicles.
g. Fiscal Impact:

I. There is no annual maintenance cost for The Mobile Command Center.

II. Vehicle maintenance cost is approximately $1,575 per year, per vehicle (parts, labor, and fuel).

6. Firearms of Greater than .50 caliber (Category 8)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

Mossberg 590 12 gauge pump action shotguns. Purchase cost, approximately $1,400 each. Quantity: 2. These shotguns are built on a standard Mossberg 590 action. They have a 13.5 inch barrel with a breaching muzzle brake affixed to the end of the barrel.
b. Purpose:

These shotguns are specifically designed to be used as breaching tools in situations where rapid entry into a structure is required, such as a hostage situation. They are used to defeat the locking mechanism or the hinges of door by firing a breaching shotgun round into these areas.
c. Authorized Use:

Only members of the ESU Tactical team who have completed a breaching school and are trained in the use of these weapons are authorized to use them. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable department policies, including but not limited to Use of Force-300, Firearms-306, Search and Siezure-312 and Emergency Services Unit-404. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize firearms and ammunition only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
e. Required Training:

Only officers who have completed a department authorized breaching school may use these shotguns. The school must include specific training related to the breaching shotgun.
f. Expected Lifespan:

No expiration date. The shotguns may need replacement parts when serviced or

19.62 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 12
replaced if they break.
g. Fiscal Impact:
$0-$1,400 per year.

7. Firearms of Greater than .50 Caliber (Category 8)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

Remington 870 12 Gauge pump action chemical agent launching shotgun.

Purchase cost: $700. Quantity: 1.This shotgun was repurposed from an out of service shotgun that SCPD already had in inventory. This shotgun is specifically designed to launch a specific type of chemical munition. Though based on a standard 12 gauge shotgun, it is not designed or capable of firing lethal shotgun rounds. The buttstock and fore-end are bright orange and it is marked as a “Less Lethal” weapon. It has a purpose built launching cup permanently affixed to the muzzle.
b. Purpose:

This shotgun is designed to launch a specific type of launchable CS (2- chlorobenzylidene malononitrile) chemical agent canisters approximately 25 yards away. It allows officers to deploy chemical agents during critical incidents from behind cover or in a situation where hand delivering the agents would be unsafe.

It allows officers the ability to deploy chemical agents in second and third floors of structures where it would be impossible for officers to hand deliver the agents. c. Authorized Use:

Only officers assigned to the ESU Tactical team are currently authorized to use this launching shotgun.
d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable policies including but not limited to Use of Force-300, Firearms306, Control Devices and Techniqies-302, Search and Seizure- 312 and ESU Tactical team -404. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize firearms and ammunition only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
e. Required Training:

Officers must attend department training regarding the use of these items. This training includes SCPD policy, legal obligations and reporting requirements.

Instructors must attend a 40 hour POST certified instructor course regarding the use of chemical agents, noise, flash, diversionary devices (NFDD) and deployment platforms, in addition to manufacture specific instructor certifications.

The SCPD maintains officers who are POST certified as instructors of chemical munitions, NFDD and launching platforms. These officers in turn train other members of the department.
f. Expected Lifespan:

No expiration. The shotgun may need parts when serviced or replacement if it breaks.
g. Fiscal Impact:
$0-$700 per year.

8. Ammunition of .50 caliber or greater (Category 9).
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

19.63 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 13

12. Gauge launching Cartridges Defense Technologies part number 1210.

Purchase cost: $371.25. Quantity: 55. These are blank shotgun cartridges that utilize black powder as the propellant.
b. Purpose:

When used with launching shotgun, the pressure created in the barrel by the expanding gasses of the black powder propellant provide enough force to launch the chemical agent canister from the shotgun. Though this ammunition is designed and is advertised for other uses, the SCPD only uses it as a launching cartridge for the launching shotgun.
c. Authorized Use:

Only officers assigned to the ESU team who are trained in the use of the launching shotgun are permitted to use these shotgun-launching rounds. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable policies including but not limited to Use of Force-300, Firearms- 306, Control Devices and Techniqies-302, Search and Seizure- 312 and ESU Tactical team -404. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize firearms and ammunition only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
e. Required Training:

Officers must attend department training regarding the use of these items. This training includes SCPD policy, legal obligations and reporting requirements.

Instructors must attend a 40 hour POST certified instructor course regarding the use of chemical agents, NFDD and deployment platforms, in addition to manufacture specific instructor certifications. The SCPD maintains officers who are POST certified as instructors of chemical munitions, NFDD and launching platforms. These officers in turn train other members of the department. f. Expected Lifespan:
5 years.
g. Fiscal Impact:
$0-$500 per year.

9. Specialized Firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber (Category 10) a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

The department maintains a Precision Rifle team within the ESU Tactical team.

These officers are trained in the use of precision rifles that are specifically designed to stop lethal threats at various distances and through barrier mediums that a carbine rifle would not. These rifles are chambered in .308 Winchester.

This is a .30 caliber round that is highly accurate and used during potentially lethal encounters. The .308 is capable of defeating soft body armor at greater distances.

I. Defiance bolt action precision rifles. Purchase cost: $15,609. Quantity: 3.

II. Accuracy International AT series bolt action rifle. Purchase cost: $4,462.

Quantity: 1.

III. Hornady .308 155 grain ELD Match TAP ammunition. Purchase cost:
$6,720. Quantity: 3,200.
b. Purpose:

19.64 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 14
To provide officers with the ability to address lethal threats with more precision, at greater distances than a Carbine rifle or handgun are capable. c. Authorized Use:

Only those officers assigned to the ESU Tactical team, and who have been selected as members of the Precision Rifle team may use these weapons. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable department policies, including but not limited to, Use of Force-300, Firearms-306 and ESU Tactical Team-404. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize firearms and ammunition only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force. e. Required Training:

Officers assigned to the Precision Rifle Team are required to attend and pass a POST certified basic Precision Rifle course before they are permitted to use these weapons.
f. Expected Lifespan:

I. Defiance Precision Rifles, no expiration date. They will need parts and service as they become worn or break.

II. Accuracy International AT Series Rifle, no expiration date. It will need parts and service as they become worn or break.

III. Hornady 155 grain ELD Match TAP, no expiration date. g. Fiscal Impact:

I. Precision rifles, $0-$1,000 per fiscal year.

II. Hornady Ammunition, $0-$6,720 per fiscal year.

10. Flashbang, Teargas and Pepper balls (Category 12)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

Noise, Flash, Diversionary Devices (NFDD) commonly referred to as “flashbangs” are single use devices that emits a loud bang and a very bright flash. They are designed to disorient and distract dangerous subjects by overwhelming their senses and provide a window of time, approximately 6-8 seconds, for officers to take control of dangerous or high-risk situations.

Additionally, the SCPD possess “Stinger Grenades.” This device is a rubber ball that contains a small NFDD in addition to 60 .32 caliber rubber balls. When used, the grenade separates along its hemisphere and expels the balls while simultaneously giving a loud bang and bright flash. These are useful in crowd control or riot situations as a means to disperse groups of violent individuals in addition to the disorienting effect of the NFDD component to mitigate dangerous behavior. These can be purchased in configurations that include OC/CS (2chlorobenzylidene malononitrile/Oleoresin Capsicum) agent dispersing capabilities, inert powders or simply the .32 caliber balls.

I. 8902NR 12 gram low roll NFDD. Purchase cost: $2,426. Quantity: 40.

II. 7007 4 gram NFDD training reloads. Purchase cost $955. Quantity: 26.

III. 1090 Stinger Grenades. Purchase cost $523. Quantity: 10. b. Purpose:

To produce a loud noise, overpressure and a very bright flash, that can cause temporary psychological and physiological deprivation and give officers an advantage in high-risk tactical situations. Generally, NFDD (not including stinger

19.65 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 15
grenades) are not a primary device used in riot situations, however there are narrow instances requiring authorization of the incident commander where they could be used.
c. Authorized Use:

Only those officers who are trained in the use of the devices are authorized to use them. Currently the only officers trained in the use of these devices are members of the ESU Tactical team. Use of NFDD is controlled by SCPD policy and best practice. Situations where an NFDD may be used include but are not limited to: hostage or barricaded subject situations, high-risk warrant service (arrest/search) where risk to officers is extremely high; during any other high risk situation where use of an NFDD may increase officer safety or training. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable department policies, including but not limited to Use of Force-300, ESU tactical Team-404, Control Devices and Techniques-302. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize these devices only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force. e. Required Training:

Officers must attend department training regarding the use of these items. This training includes SCPD policy, legal obligations and reporting requirements.

Instructors must attend a 40 hour POST certified instructor course regarding the use of chemical agents, NFDD and deployment platforms, in addition to manufacture specific instructor certifications. The SCPD maintains officers who are POST certified as instructors of chemical munitions, NFDD and launching platforms. These officers in turn train other members of the department. f. Expected Lifespan:

I. 8902NR 12 gram low roll NFDD- 5 years.

II. 7007 4 gram NFDD training reloads- 5 years.
g. Fiscal Impact:

I. 8902NR 12 gram low roll NFDD-$0-$2000 per year.

II. 7007 4 gram NFDD training reloads $0-$832 per year.

11. Chemical Agents “Teargas” (Category 12)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

The SCPD uses chemical agents, commonly referred to as “teargas” as less lethal tools to disperse rioting subjects or on barricaded subjects. The two agents the SCPD uses are CS (2-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile) and OC (Oleoresin Capsicum). CS is an irritating agent and a lachrymator. It irritates the eyes and causes tearing while also irritating the respiratory system causing coughing.

These reactions are temporary and quickly subside especially if the subjects remove themselves from the area where the chemical agent has been deployed.

The U.S Army has tested CS extensively. There are no known allergic reactions to CS. OC is an, inflammatory agent. It causes a burning sensation, involuntary closure of the eyes and tightness in the chest. These symptoms generally subside within an hour or less of exposure. OC is legal for civilians to possess in certain quantities.

I. 1082 Riot Control CS Canister. Purchase cost: $352. Quantity: 12.

Pyrotechnic device used in outdoor situations to disperse rioting crowds,

19.66 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 16
should not be used indoors due to risk of fire. Releases 75.6 grams of CS in 20-40 seconds.

II. 1032 Tri-Chamber Flameless CS Canister. Purchase cost: $647. Quantity:

14. Pyrotechnic device designed to be used indoors and presents a minimal risk of fire. Hand delivered only. Releases 20 grams of agent in 20- 30 seconds.

III. 5230B Baffled Launchable CS canister. Purchase cost: $416. Quantity:

10. Pyrotechnic device, designed to be launched from the launching shotgun. For use indoors and presents minimal risk of fire. Releases 25 grams of agent in 20-40 seconds.

IV. 1026 Triple Chaser separating canister. Purchase cost: $1,047. Quantity:

20. Pyrotechnic device, designed to be used outdoors in riot control situations. It is a canister, that when deployed separates into three smaller canisters. It allows officers to deploy chemical agents over a larger area with less munitions. Releases 92 grams of agent between three separate smaller canisters over 20-30 seconds.

V. 56854 Aerosol OC Fogger. Purchase cost: $89. Quantity: 4. Nonpyrotechnic canister. This canister sprays OC with the aid of compressed air. It is designed to be used indoors or in vehicles. It has no risk of fire. It will release a 1.3% OC spray over 15-25 seconds.

VI. 2262 40mm CS Liquid Ferret projectile. Purchase cost: $1,238. Quantity:

44. Non-pyrotechnic launched projectile. This munition is fired from a 40mm less lethal launcher. It is a hardened projectile intended to be used to defeat barriers such as glass and thin wooden barriers. When it penetrates or impacts a hard surface, it disperses liquid CS agent into the area. These are not for use against people.

VII. 2260 40mm OC Liquid Ferret projectile. Purchase cost: $289. Quantity:

10. Non-pyrotechnic launched projectile. This munition is fired from a 40mm less lethal launcher. It is a hardened projectile intended to be used to defeat barriers such as glass and thin wooden barriers. When it penetrates or impacts a hard surface, it disperses liquid OC agent into the area. These are not for use against people.
b. Purpose:

To limit escalating situations where lethal force is prohibited or undesirable.

Situations where these munitions would be deployed include, but are not limited to: self-destructive, dangerous or combative individuals; riot or crowd control situations or other violent civil unrest; situations where use of the munitions would provide a tactical advantage; training or authorized demonstration. A “tactical advantage” could include but is not limited to: deployment into a structure or vehicle where an armed violent/self-destructive subject is barricaded; or a riot situation where, deployment can either create an environment that causes violent persons to disperse or leave the area or limit the advance of a violent group or deny a violent group access to specific areas or law enforcement. c. Authorized Use:

Only officers trained in the use of these munitions may use them. This includes officers assigned to the ESU Tactical team and officers assigned as “grenadiers” during a crowd control or violent civil unrest situation.

19.67 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 17
d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

To be used in accordance with Penal Code section 13652 (AB 48). All applicable policies, including but not limited to Use of Force-300, ESU Tactical team-404 and Control Devices and techniques-302. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force. e. Required Training:

Officers must attend department training regarding the use of these items. This training includes SCPD policy, legal obligations and reporting requirements.

Instructors must attend a 40 hour POST certified instructor course regarding the use of chemical agents, NFDD and deployment platforms, in addition to manufacture specific instructor certifications. The SCPD maintains officers who are POST certified as instructors of chemical munitions, NFDD and launching platforms. These officers in turn train the other members of the department. f. Expected Lifespan:

I. 1082 Riot Control CS Canister-5 years.

II. 1032 Tri-Chamber Flameless CS Canister-5 years.

III. 5230B Baffled Launchable CS canister-5 years.

IV. 1026 Triple Chaser separating canister-5 years.

V. 56854 Aerosol OC Fogger-5 years.

VI. 2262 40mm CS Liquid Ferret projectile-5 years.

VII. 2260 40mm OC Liquid Ferret projectile-5 years.
g. Fiscal Impact:

All chemical munitions $0-$5,000 per fiscal year based on fiscal budgeting.

12. Pepper Ball Guns and Pepper Balls (Category 12)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost.

I. Pepper ball guns. Purchase cost. $1,399. Quantity: 4. Pepper ball guns are a compressed air powered launcher, almost identical in manufacture to a common paintball gun. It fires .68 caliber plastic balls that contain an irritant powder. The pepper ball gun can fire pepper balls up to 60 feet and can launch pepper balls farther to saturate an area.

II. Pepper Balls. Purchase cost: $967 (per container). Quantity: 4 (containers of 375 pepper balls). Pepper Balls are .68 caliber projectiles.

They are a plastic shell that contains an irritant powder that consists of PAVA, a pepper derivative. This powder causes a burning sensation and involuntary eye closure when coupled with the impact of the projectile. It is used for pain compliance and disorientation.
b. Purpose:

To limit escalating situations where lethal force is prohibited or undesirable.

Situations where these munitions would be deployed, include: Self destructive, dangerous or combative individuals; riot or crowd control situations or other violent civil unrest; situations where use of the munitions would provide a tactical advantage; training or authorized demonstration. A “tactical advantage” could include but is not limited to: deployment into a structure or vehicle where an armed violent/self-destructive subject is barricaded, or a riot situation where, deployment can either create an environment that causes violent persons to

19.68 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 18
disperse or leave the area or limit the advance of a violent group or deny a violent group access to specific areas or law enforcement.
c. Authorized Use:

Only officers who are certified to use the pepper ball system. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

To be used in accordance with Penal Code section 13652 (AB 48). All applicable policies including but not limited to Use of Force-300, Control Devices and Techniques-302. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize pepper ball guns and pepper balls only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force. e. Required Training:

Officers must attend a manufacturer specific training course to be certified to use the pepper ball systems.
f. Expected Lifespan:

I. Pepper ball guns, no expiration. They will need parts and service as they wear out or break.

II. Pepper Balls, 2 years.
g. Fiscal Impact
Pepper ball guns, $0-$500 per year. Pepper
Balls $0-$500 per year.

13. Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) (Category 13)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

GENASYS Inc. LRAD-100X. Purchase cost: $8,179.77. Quantity: 1. This device is a self-contained, lightweight, battery operated hailer that communicates with great intelligibility up to 600 meters. It emits acoustic sound pressure levels up to 140db. It provides clear unmistakable, intelligible communications and stunning alert tones and can play pre-recorded audio messages, mp3 audio files and live broadcasting via a handheld microphone. It can broadcast tones at a volume that causes discomfort to those who hear the tones. The device provides directional sound capabilities allowing the user to direct the uncomfortable tones at a specific person or group of persons.
b. Purpose:

To serve as a notification/communication system during critical incidents, where the user is conveying a message to a person or persons. To be used during violent or riotous situations as a means to advise participants that they are involved in legally prohibited activities. To be used to broadcast alert tones in a directed manner at persons involved in riotous or destructive behavior as a means of dispersing the crowd and stopping the behavior. This device provides the SCPD with the ability to address violent persons or groups of persons during a riot or other violent crowd control situation without the use of kinetic less lethal weapons such 40mm launchers or chemical agents, allowing SCPD to attempt de-escalation via less forceful means.
c. Authorized Use:

Only officers who are trained in its use, with the authorization of an incident commander, may use this device.

19.69 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 19
d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable policies including but not limited to Use of Force-300, Control Devices and Techniques-302. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize the LRAD only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law.
e. Required Training:

Officers must attend a department specified training to use this device. f. Expected Lifespan:
20-25 years. Repairs completed as needed.
g. Fiscal Impact:

No known fiscal impact, the device is new.

14. 40mm Projectile Launchers (Category 14)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

The 40mm projectile launcher is a Less Lethal platform. It is not a firearm and is not capable of firing any military grade explosive projectile. It is designed to fire a projectile designed to be used against persons in situations where lethal force is prohibited. It allows officers to use Less Lethal Direct Impact spins stabilized munitions at distances up to 120 feet. The munitions cause pain compliance via blunt force impact. They can incapacitate violent subjects armed with weapons that are not firearms, allowing officers to safely take a subject into custody. The standoff capabilities allow officers to apply force via the impact rounds and assess if further application of force is required. This mitigates the need for officers to approach a violent/armed subject, reducing the chances of a lethal force scenario.

I. Defense Technologies DT1325 40mm-single barrel launchers. Purchase cost: $11,620. Quantity: 14. (No longer manufactured)
II. Lewis Machine and Tool (LMT) 1425 40mm single barrel launchers.

Purchase cost: $12,450. Quantity: 15.

III. Lewis Machine and Tool (LMT) 1440 40mm 4 shot multi launchers.

Purchase cost: $3,798. Quantity: 2.

IV. Penn Arms PGL65-40 40mm 6 shot multi launcher. Purchase cost:

Approximately $3,000. Quantity: 1.
b. Purpose:

To be used as a less lethal tool, to apply pain compliance to self-destructive, armed or combative/resistive persons, to prevent the person from causing harm to themselves or others. Also used during violent riots or large crowd control disturbances. They can be used to mark persons engaged in the above activity making the person(s) identifiable for arrest.
c. Authorized Use:

Only officers who have completed a department training course may deploy these less lethal tools. Every patrol vehicle has a single launcher in it for use by patrol officers. Only officers specifically trained in the use and application during a crowd control or riotous situation may use them in those instances. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

To be used in accordance with Penal Code section 13652 (AB 48). All applicable policies, including but not limited to, Use of Force-300, Control Devices and Techniques-302 and Emergency services Tactical Team-404. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize these devices only for official law enforcement purposes, and

19.70 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 20
pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force. e. Required Training:

Officers must attend department training regarding the use of these items. This training includes SCPD policy, legal obligations and reporting requirements.

Instructors must attend a 40 hour POST certified instructor course regarding the use of chemical agents, NFDD and deployment platforms, in addition to manufacture specific instructor certifications. The SCPD maintains officers who are POST certified as instructors of chemical munitions, NFDD and launching platforms. These officers in turn train other members of the department. f. Expected Lifespan:

I. Defense Technologies DT1325 40mm-single barrel launchers: No expiration. No longer manufactured. Will be serviced or repaired as long as viable.

II. Lewis Machine and Tool (LMT) 1425 40mm single barrel launchers: No expiration. Will need parts and service when they wear out or break.

III. Lewis Machine and Tool (LMT) 1440 40mm 4 shot multi launchers: No expiration. Will need parts and service when they wear out or break.

IV. Penn Arms PGL65-40 40mm 6 shot multi launcher: No expiration. Will need parts and service when it wears out or breaks.
g. Fiscal Impact:

For all of the listed launchers: $0-500 per year.

15. 40mm ammunition: (Category 14)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:
40mm ammunition meant to be used in 40mm Projectile Launchers described above. All of the 40mm rounds in this section are approved for use against people if the force is justified. SCPD has three impact munitions, the Exact Impact is a less lethal projectile made of a foam rubber often called a “sponge round” with a consistency similar to a sponge. It is fired using smokeless powder and is designed to incapacitate people through pain compliance and impact. It is blue in color and can be fired from ranges between 5’ and 120’. The Direct Impact round is an impact munition that carries a powder payload within the projectile.

The payload can be a chemical agent powder or it can contain an inert marking powder. These munitions provide the same less lethal pain compliance/deescalation/violence mitigation functions as the Exact Impact munitions, with the added benefit of an irritant powder, or the ability to make a riotous subject identifiable for arrest. The SCPD also uses reusable training ammunition that allow true to real training at lower cost.

I. eXact Impact 40mm: Purchase cost: $4,011. Quantity: 140.

II. Direct Impact 40mm OC. Purchase cost: $732. Quantity: 24.

III. Direct Impact 40mm Marking. Purchase cost: $970. Quantity: 32.

IV. Training Sponge ammunition 24 round kit. Purchase cost: $2,537.

Quantity: 7.
b. Purpose:

To be used as a less lethal tool in situations where lethal force is prohibited. To

19.71 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 21
assist officers in intervening in violent or potentially violent situations by use of pain compliance. To allow officers the ability to apply less lethal force from distance or behind cover, which provides time to assess the effect of the force used and re-apply or discontinue force as the situation allows. c. Authorized Use:

Only officers who are trained in the use of these projectiles are authorized to use them. Situations where use may be authorized include but are not limited to:
armed self-destructive individuals, violent resistive individuals, violent riotous individuals, situations where use would increase safety and mitigate the need for higher uses of force, authorized training or demonstrations. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

To be used in accordance with Penal Code section 13652 (AB 48). All applicable policies including but not limited to Use of Force-300, Control Devices and Techniques-302. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize these devices only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
e. Required Training:

Officers must attend department training regarding the use of these items. This training includes SCPD policy, legal obligations and reporting requirements.

Instructors must attend a 40 hour POST certified instructor course regarding the use of chemical agents, NFDD and deployment platforms, in addition to manufacture specific instructor certifications. The SCPD maintains officers who are POST certified as instructors of chemical munitions, NFDD and launching platforms. These officers in turn train other members of the department. f. Expected Lifespan:

I. eXact Impact 40mm-5 years.

II. Direct Impact 40mm OC-5 years.

III. Direct Impact 40mm Marking-5 years.

IV. Training Sponge ammunition 24 round kit-5 years.
g. Fiscal Impact:
$0- 5,000 per year. Given the 5 year life span of these munitions, the SCPD may not need to purchase more every fiscal year.

16. Other Specified Items/Equipment (Category 15)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

The department currently issues AR-15/M4 style Carbine rifles to its officers as a means of addressing potential lethal force situations. The department issues two brands, Colt and Lewis Machine and Tool (LMT). The Carbine rifle is a lightweight, gas operated, air-cooled, shoulder fired, semi-automatic, magazine fed weapon. It is capable at providing accurate fire at various distances. The Hornady 5.56x45mm NATO, 75 grain BTHP (Boat Tail Hollow Point) TAP (Tactical Application Police) is the current standard issue rifle ammunition for all carbines in the department. This ammunition type is a medium caliber rifle round.

It is capable of defeating soft body armor a subject may be wearing, as well as other intermediate barriers. The duty round is specifically designed to limit over

19.72 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 2026 Military Equipment - 22
penetration thus mitigating danger to innocent persons or other officers. SCPD uses ammunition of the same caliber ammunition for training purposes.

Generally, the training ammunition is 55 grain full metal jacket ammunition. This type of ammunition is solely for training purposes. The cost of the training ammunition is less than that of the duty ammunition.

I. Colt LE6920 Carbines. Purchase cost: $31,350. Quantity: 33.

II. Colt Sporter Carbines. Purchase cost: $1,900. Quantity 2.

III. LMT Carbines. Purchase cost: $49,000. Quantity: 35.

IV. Hornady 5.56x45mm NATO, 75 grain BTHP TAP. Purchase cost:
$4,560. Quantity: 5,700. SCPD does not have to order duty ammunition every fiscal year.

V. .223/5.56 55 grain full metal jacket is the standard training round the department uses. The manufacturer of the ammunition varies based on what is available at the time the department needs to make an order. Quantity: 35,500. Cost: $12,070.
b. Purpose:

The Carbine rifle provides officers the ability to employ a more precise weapon in potential lethal force encounters. It provides officers the ability address armed violent subjects at a greater distance than with a handgun. It provides officers with the ability to defeat soft body armor and intermediate barriers when addressing armed violent subjects.
c. Authorized Use:

Only officers who have completed a POST required 16 hour training course are authorized to use the carbine rifle and associated ammunition. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable department policies, including but not limited to, Use of Force-300, Firearms-306. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize firearms and ammunition only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
e. Required Training:

All officers are required to attend a POST required 16 hour Patrol Rifle course before they are permitted to use these weapons. Currently this course is mandatory for all officers after graduating the Academy, before beginning the Field Training Program
f. Expected Lifespan:

Carbine Rifles, approximately 20 years. Service is performed as needed and parts are replaced as they become worn or break.

Hornady TAP 75 grain 5.56x45mm NATO, no expiration.
.223/5.56x45 training ammunition, no expiration.
g. Fiscal Impact:

Carbine Rifles: $0-$12,000 per fiscal year.

Ammunition: $0-$40,000 per fiscal year.

19.73 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 1
Military Equipment
705.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of military equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
705.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):

Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Department.

Military equipment – Includes but is not limited to the following:
 Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles.  Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers.  High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached.  Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants.  Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.  Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind.  Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
 Firearms and ammunition of_.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
 Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than_.50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code §30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.
 Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.  Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools.  Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
 TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs).

Policy
705

19.74 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 2
 Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
 Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
705.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Santa Cruz Police Department that, with respect to military equipment, members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071, Penal Code § 13652 (AB 48), City of Santa Cruz Resolution No. NS-29,862, and Council Policy No. 29-16.
705.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of this department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of Santa Cruz Police Department (Government Code § 7071). e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department’s funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner.
705.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying equipment for the Department:

See attachment: 2026 03 Santa Cruz Police AB 481 Equipment List_FINAL.pdf

19.75 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 3
705.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the governing body by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the governing body and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The military equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):
a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.
f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. 705.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Absent exigent circumstances, as further discussed in Section 705.10, military equipment should not be used by any other law enforcement agency or member in this jurisdiction unless the military equipment is approved for use in accordance with this policy. 705.7 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the governing body for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).

The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in department inventory.

19.76 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 4
705.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.
705.9 PUBLIC SUBMITTAL OF COMPLAINTS, CONCERNS AND/OR QUESTIONS Any member of the public wishing to submit a complaint, concern, or question regarding the Department's use of each specific type of military equipment, should contact the Department's Professional Standards Unit, call (831) 420-5800, or visit the Department's website at https:// www.cityofsantacruz.com/government/city-departments/police and select the "Community Feed Back Form." Complaints, concerns, or questions can be submitted in any form (i.e., in person, telephone, email, etc.). The Department will work diligently to timely respond to the public submittal of complaints, concerns, and/or questions regarding the Department's use of each specific type of military equipment.
705.10 USE IN EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES
In exigent circumstances and with the approval of the Chief of Police or his/her designee, the Police Department may utilize military equipment that is not included in this policy to promote the safety and security of community members. shall notify the City Manager or his/her designee as soon as circumstantially feasible. If the Department utilizes military equipment not included in this policy in such exigent circumstances, it must take all of the following actions:
 The Chief of Police or his/her designee shall notify the City Manager or his/her designee of said use as soon as circumstantially feasible.
 Immediately cease use of the military equipment once the exigent circumstances necessitating such use cease to exist.
 Include Report to Council information about the use and the military equipment used, consistent with Government Code section 7072, within 30 days of the use of the military equipmentin the Department’s next annual military equipment report.

19.77 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 5
Santa Cruz Police Department Military Use Equipment List Pursuant to AB481.

1. Robot (Category 1)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

I. Recon Robotics “Throw bot.” Purchase cost: $9,000 in 2013. Quantity: 1.

This equipment is a battery powered, remote operated device. It is equipped with a color camera as well as infrared capabilities that allow for use in low or no light situations. It does not have audio capabilities, nor is it capable of creating audio or video recordings. The Throw Bot is designed to be carried and operated by one person and can be thrown a significant distance without damage. It cannot traverse stairs on its own and it does not have any arm, claw or other type of manipulation attachment. The Throw Bot has no ability to have a weapon or other device affixed to it, nor is the Throw Bot capable of delivering a weapon or other device. This equipment is for use during high-risk incidents or incidents where its use may enhance officer or civilian safety. These include but are not limited to:
a high-risk search warrant, barricaded subject or hostage negotiation/rescue. This equipment can provide officers with the location of a subject inside of a structure or room. It can assist officers in locating suspects, determining whether the suspect armed, and can provide the locations of injured persons or hostages. This equipment can provide critical tactical information without placing officers at undue risk. This equipment has been used in numerous high risk and dangerous incidents.

II. Recon Robotics “Throw bot 2.” Purchase cost: $16,270. Quantity: 1. This equipment is a battery powered, remote operated device. It is equipped with a color camera as well as infrared capabilities that allow for use in low or no light situations. It is capable of one-way audio (Listening only). The audio and video captured by the Throw Bot 2 can be recorded onto an SD card via the remote device. The Throw Bot 2 is designed to be carried and operated by one person and can be thrown a significant distance without damage. It cannot traverse stairs on its own and it does not have any arm, claw, or other type of manipulation attachment. The Throw Bot 2 has no ability to have a weapon or other device affixed to it, the Throw Bot 2 is incapable of delivering a weapon or other device. This equipment is for use during high-risk incidents or incidents where its use may enhance officer or civilian safety. These include but are not limited to: a high-risk search warrant, barricaded subject or hostage negotiation/rescue. This equipment can provide officers with the location of a subject inside of a structure or room. It can assist officers in locating suspects, determining whether the suspect is armed, and can provide the locations of injured persons or hostages. This equipment can provide critical tactical information without placing officers at undue risk. This equipment has been used in numerous high risk and dangerous incidents.

III. AVITAR II by Robotex. SCPD has access to two AVITAR II robots maintained by the Santa Cruz Sheriff’s Office. The AVITAR II is a heavyduty robot, controlled by remote operation with a camera attachment owned by the Santa Cruz Sheriff’s Office.
b. Purpose:

19.78 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 6
To be used to remotely search areas and gain visual data. c. Authorized Use:

The SCPD Emergency Service Unit (ESU) Tactical team has primary control over the Throw Bot. It is available for use by any SCPD officer in any situation where it would enhance officer or civilian safety. The AVITAR II Robots are entirely owned and operated by Santa Cruz Sheriff’s Office personnel. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable SCPD policies, including but not limited to, Search and Seizure312, Missing Persons-316, Emergency Services Unit-404 and Recordings 426.5.

Any use of SCPD robots will be for official law enforcement purposes, pursuant to State and Federal law, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community.
e. Required Training:

I. The SCPD conducts department specified training for personnel to use the Throw Bot. This includes set up, deployment, safe and effective use of the Throw Bot and Throw Bot 2. This includes set up, deployment, safe and effective use of the Throw Bots.

II. Training required for the use of the AVITAR II robots is in accordance with the Santa Cruz County Sherriff’s policy.
f. Expected Lifespan:

I. Throw Bot: The Throw Bot is designed to be in service 8-10 years. The Throw Bot will be used until repairs are no longer supported by the manufacturer, the Throw Bot has been in service since 2013. It has been repaired by the manufacturer once.

II. Throw Bot 2: The Throw Bot 2 is designed to be in service 8-10 years.

The Throw Bot 2 is covered under the manufacturer’s warranty for one year. Once the warranty expires any repairs required will be done by the manufacturer at SCPD’s cost.

III. AVITAR II: Not a consideration for SCPD.
g. Fiscal Impact
I. Throw Bot: No known annual maintenance costs.

II. Throw Bot 2: $16,270 (Homeland Security grant funded). No known annual maintenance costs.

III. AVITAR II: No fiscal impact for SCPD.

2. Unmanned Aerial Systems UAS (Category 1)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

I. Skydio Drone X10 Unmanned Aerial Drone with Skydio, spare propellers and batteries, NightSense, Visible Light for X10, Skydio Spotlight for X10, and Skydio Speaker/Mic for X10, 5G Connectivity. Purchase cost:
$21,706.88 each. Quantity sought: 5. This equipment is a batterypowered remote operated Unmanned Aerial Drone. It is equipped with a camera that is capable of audio and video recording. The camera has low light capabilities and can be used in darkness. The camera has thermal capabilities, meaning that it can detect heat signatures of substances, objects, or persons that are warmer than their surrounding environment.

The camera has zoom capabilities that enable it to read the license plate

19.79 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 7
of a vehicle up to 800 yards away. The drone is capable of mapping crime scenes and major collisions scenes. When used in conjunction with software, 3 dimensional renderings of these scenes can be created for investigative purposes. The UAS has a 40-minute flight time per battery, it can fly at speeds of up to 45 miles per hour and it can be deployed by a trained operator in less than 40 seconds. The UAS cannot be weaponized and is not designed to carry or deploy any type of weapon or device. While versions of the UAS software has facial recognition capacities, the UAS will not be used for facial recognition and the Department will not purchase software that supports facial recognition.

II. Skydio Drone R10 Unmanned Aerial Drone with Skydio, designed for indoor and confined-space operations, batteries, 5G Connectivity, obstacle avoidance, onboard LED lighting, two-way audio, livestreaming, and NightSense. Purchase cost: $ 4,998 each. Quantity sought: 2. This equipment is a battery-powered remote operated Unmanned Aerial Drone.

It is equipped with a camera that is capable of audio and video recording.

The camera has low light capabilities and can be used in darkness. The UAS has a 20-minute flight time per battery, it has a maximum perch time of 3-hours, it can fly at horizontal speeds of up to 27 miles per hour. The UAS cannot be weaponized and is not designed to carry or deploy any type of weapon or device. The UAS has no facial recognition capabilities, it will not be used for facial recognition, and the Department will not purchase software that supports facial recognition.
b. Purpose
To support authorized law enforcement activity by providing aerial visual and audio capabilities.
c. Authorized Use:

Only officers who are licensed and have completed the required training may deploy and operate the UAS. The UAS will be operated in compliance with all applicable local, State and Federal laws and in accordance with constitutional and privacy rights. Authorized uses of the UAS include, but are not limited to, the following:

I. Public safety emergency
II. Search and Rescue/Water Rescue
III. Lost or missing persons
IV. Investigation of suspicious or explosive devices
V. Natural disaster response and management
VI. Crime scene documentation (X10 UAS only)
VII. Traffic collision documentation (X10 UAS only)
VIII. Recovery of decedent
IX. Qualifying law enforcement or fire department mutual aid X. Pursuant to a valid search and/or arrest warrant
XI. To assist in the service of a valid search and/or arrest warrant XII. Crime in progress
XIII. Locating a fleeing suspect (X10 UAS only)

19.80 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 8
XIV. Departmental videos including but not limited to recruitment and public relations
XV. Educational demonstrations
XVI. Department training
d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable SCPD policies, including but not limited to, Unmanned Aerial System607, Search and Seizure-312, Missing Persons-316, Emergency Services Unit-404 and Recordings 426.5; Santa Cruz Municipal Code Chapter 9.85. Use of UAS will be for official law enforcement purposes, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to local, State and Federal law, and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations.
e. Required Training:

The Department will maintain a current FAA Certificate of Waiver or Authorization.

All operators must be licensed pursuant to FAA Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate.

All UAS operators will complete additional training as may be required by department policy and/or State and Federal regulations. f. Expected Lifespan:

I. Skydio Drone X10: Each UAS has a 1-year limited manufacturer’s warranty. The Department will purchase an additional 3-year care package for each UAS. This provides for one non-cost replacement of an inoperable UAS and reduced costs for any subsequent replacements.

The Department intends to operate these UAS until they become obsolete and are no longer supported by the manufacturer.

I.II. Skydio Drone R10: Each UAS has a 1-year limited manufacturer’s warranty. The Department will purchase an additional 3-year care package for each UAS. This provides for one non-cost replacement of an inoperable UAS and reduced costs for any subsequent replacements.

The Department intends to operate these UAS until they become obsolete and are no longer supported by the manufacturer. g. Fiscal Impact
I. Skydio Drone X10: The Department will be required to modify two marked SCPD vehicles with specific equipment to operate the UAS. This equipment will be used to store and transport drones, display monitors, power inverter systems, spare batteries, and solar charging equipment.

The estimated purchase and installation cost for this equipment is $27,708.

In addition to the purchase cost of the UAS, and operational equipment, the Department will purchase software and licensing. These costs are estimated at $80,516.45 over the course of five years and include the software required to operate the UAS and to integrate the UAS with the Department’s Axon evidence system.

Initial training costs for the first year are estimated at $6,926 and will include all required training and licensing costs for the UAS operators, including FAA licensing.

19.81 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 9
The Department will also purchase warranty and support service subscriptions over the course of five years for a total of $26,245.

II. Skydio Drone R10: The Department will utilize existing modified marked SCPD vehicles with specific equipment to operate the UAS. This equipment will be used to store and transport drones, display monitors, power inverter systems, spare batteries, and solar charging equipment.

In addition to the purchase cost of the UAS and operational equipment, the Department will purchase software and licensing. These costs are estimated at $18,011 over the course of five years and include the software required to operate the UAS and to integrate the UAS with the Department’s Axon evidence system.

Initial training costs for the first year are estimated at $1,366 and will include all required training and licensing costs for the UAS operators, including FAA licensing.

The Department will also purchase warranty and support service subscriptions over the course of five years for a total of $6,168.

3. Armored Personnel Carrier, vehicle with entry apparatus attached (Category 2&3) a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

Lenco Armored Rescue Vehicle (ARV). Purchase cost $230,378. Quantity: 1. The ARV is designed to provide ballistic protection during tactical events, and is designed to withstand multiple bullet strikes from small arms fire and low level explosions. The ARV is equipped with remote operated spotlights, emergency lights, siren and a public address system. Common uses for the ARV include citizen and officer rescues, evacuations and the deployment of officers and chemical munitions. The ARV has been used in numerous high-risk and critical incidents including use by allied agencies in Santa Clara County, Santa Cruz County and San Mateo County.
b. Purpose:

To be used in response to high-risk or critical incidents to enhance officer and community safety, assist in scene containment and to assist in resolving critical incidents.
c. Authorized Use:

Only the Watch Commander or the ESU commander may authorize the use of the ARV. Deployment must be based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident. The ARV was purchased through a BUASI grant. The terms of this grant require that SCPD make the ARV available to any allied agency with the BUASI area as long as the situation the ARV is requested for meets the criteria for deployment set forth in SCPD Policy 702. SCPD generally sends at least one member of the ESU tactical team with the ARV if one is available. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable SCPD policies including but not limited to Vehicle Use -702, ESU Tactical Team-404. It is the policy of the Department to utilize armored vehicles

19.82 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 10
only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law.
e. Required Training:

Members of the ESU team train officers in the use of the ARV. This training includes capabilities of the ARV, safety considerations, conducting civilian and officer rescues as well as other deployment considerations. f. Expected Lifespan:
20 years.
g. Fiscal Impact
$4,312 per year (parts, labor, and fuel).

4. Ford F350 transport vehicle (ESU Truck, category 5)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost. 2008 Ford F350 transport vehicle. A standard Ford F350 truck chassis with a large box type compartment attached to the chassis from the cab back. Purchase cost: $65,000. Quantity: 1. The interior of the compartment is fitted with shelving and seats. The outsides of the compartment are fitted with multiple storage boxes.

The vehicle contains various equipment, spare ballistic shields, breeching tools, small tools, medical supplies, pens, writing tablets, power inverters etc. b. Purpose:

The Ford F350 is deployed during critical incidents or any other instance where it can be utilized to transport personnel and equipment.
c. Authorized Use:

Any member of the SCPD is authorized to drive the vehicle if directed to do so.

The vehicle is used primarily by the ESU team.
d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable SCPD policies including but not limited to Vehicle Use -702 and Emergency Services Unit-404. It is the policy of the SCPD to use the vehicle only for official law enforcement purposes, and in accordance with California State law regarding the operation of motor vehicles.
e. Required Training:

All driver/operators shall receive training in the safe operation of the vehicle. f. Expected lifespan:
20 Years.
g. Fiscal Impact:
$1,158 per year (parts, labor, and fuel).

5. Command and Control Vehicles (Category 5)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

Chevy Tahoe Patrol Vehicle. Purchase cost: $60,000 each.

Quantity: (1) 2017 Model (Lieutenant), (3) 2018 models (Sergeants). These vehicles can act as a Mobile Command Center. The vehicle is equipped with file cabinets, dry erase board, medical supplies and additional mapping equipment. b. Purpose:

The Mobile Command Center is commonly utilized during incidents which involve the use of the Incident Command System (ICS). The Mobile Command Center assists with creating a set of objectives and overall goals, developing appropriate

19.83 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 11
tactics, ensuring the allocation of appropriate resources, reviewing plans, communicating goals, tactics, expectations, and establishing accountability. c. Authorized Use:

The Mobile Command Center is used when deemed appropriate by the field supervisor or Watch Commander.
d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable SCPD policies including but not limited to Vehicle Use -702. It is the policy of the SCPD to use the vehicle only for official law enforcement purposes, and in accordance with California State law regarding the operation of motor vehicles.
e. Required Training:

All driver/operators shall receive training in the safe operation of the vehicle. f. Expected Lifespan:

I. Chevy Patrol Vehicle: 10 years.

II. The Mobile Command Center does not have a minimum or maximum lifespan and can be transferred to other vehicles.
g. Fiscal Impact:

I. There is no annual maintenance cost for The Mobile Command Center.

II. Vehicle maintenance cost is approximately $1,575 per year, per vehicle (parts, labor, and fuel).

6. Firearms of Greater than .50 caliber (Category 8)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

Mossberg 590 12 gauge pump action shotguns. Purchase cost, approximately $1,400 each. Quantity: 2. These shotguns are built on a standard Mossberg 590 action. They have a 13.5 inch barrel with a breaching muzzle brake affixed to the end of the barrel.
b. Purpose:

These shotguns are specifically designed to be used as breaching tools in situations where rapid entry into a structure is required, such as a hostage situation. They are used to defeat the locking mechanism or the hinges of door by firing a breaching shotgun round into these areas.
c. Authorized Use:

Only members of the ESU Tactical team who have completed a breaching school and are trained in the use of these weapons are authorized to use them. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable department policies, including but not limited to Use of Force-300, Firearms-306, Search and Siezure-312 and Emergency Services Unit-404. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize firearms and ammunition only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
e. Required Training:

Only officers who have completed a department authorized breaching school may use these shotguns. The school must include specific training related to the breaching shotgun.
f. Expected Lifespan:

No expiration date. The shotguns may need replacement parts when serviced or

19.84 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 12
replaced if they break.
g. Fiscal Impact:
$0-$1,400 per year.

7. Firearms of Greater than .50 Caliber (Category 8)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

Remington 870 12 Gauge pump action chemical agent launching shotgun.

Purchase cost: $700. Quantity: 1.This shotgun was repurposed from an out of service shotgun that SCPD already had in inventory. This shotgun is specifically designed to launch a specific type of chemical munition. Though based on a standard 12 gauge shotgun, it is not designed or capable of firing lethal shotgun rounds. The buttstock and fore-end are bright orange and it is marked as a “Less Lethal” weapon. It has a purpose built launching cup permanently affixed to the muzzle.
b. Purpose:

This shotgun is designed to launch a specific type of launchable CS (2- chlorobenzylidene malononitrile) chemical agent canisters approximately 25 yards away. It allows officers to deploy chemical agents during critical incidents from behind cover or in a situation where hand delivering the agents would be unsafe.

It allows officers the ability to deploy chemical agents in second and third floors of structures where it would be impossible for officers to hand deliver the agents. c. Authorized Use:

Only officers assigned to the ESU Tactical team are currently authorized to use this launching shotgun.
d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable policies including but not limited to Use of Force-300, Firearms306, Control Devices and Techniqies-302, Search and Seizure- 312 and ESU Tactical team -404. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize firearms and ammunition only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
e. Required Training:

Officers must attend department training regarding the use of these items. This training includes SCPD policy, legal obligations and reporting requirements.

Instructors must attend a 40 hour POST certified instructor course regarding the use of chemical agents, noise, flash, diversionary devices (NFDD) and deployment platforms, in addition to manufacture specific instructor certifications.

The SCPD maintains officers who are POST certified as instructors of chemical munitions, NFDD and launching platforms. These officers in turn train other members of the department.
f. Expected Lifespan:

No expiration. The shotgun may need parts when serviced or replacement if it breaks.
g. Fiscal Impact:
$0-$700 per year.

8. Ammunition of .50 caliber or greater (Category 9).
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

19.85 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 13

12. Gauge launching Cartridges Defense Technologies part number 1210.

Purchase cost: $371.25. Quantity: 55. These are blank shotgun cartridges that utilize black powder as the propellant.
b. Purpose:

When used with launching shotgun, the pressure created in the barrel by the expanding gasses of the black powder propellant provide enough force to launch the chemical agent canister from the shotgun. Though this ammunition is designed and is advertised for other uses, the SCPD only uses it as a launching cartridge for the launching shotgun.
c. Authorized Use:

Only officers assigned to the ESU team who are trained in the use of the launching shotgun are permitted to use these shotgun-launching rounds. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable policies including but not limited to Use of Force-300, Firearms- 306, Control Devices and Techniqies-302, Search and Seizure- 312 and ESU Tactical team -404. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize firearms and ammunition only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
e. Required Training:

Officers must attend department training regarding the use of these items. This training includes SCPD policy, legal obligations and reporting requirements.

Instructors must attend a 40 hour POST certified instructor course regarding the use of chemical agents, NFDD and deployment platforms, in addition to manufacture specific instructor certifications. The SCPD maintains officers who are POST certified as instructors of chemical munitions, NFDD and launching platforms. These officers in turn train other members of the department. f. Expected Lifespan:
5 years.
g. Fiscal Impact:
$0-$500 per year.

9. Specialized Firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber (Category 10) a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

The department maintains a Precision Rifle team within the ESU Tactical team.

These officers are trained in the use of precision rifles that are specifically designed to stop lethal threats at various distances and through barrier mediums that a carbine rifle would not. These rifles are chambered in .308 Winchester.

This is a .30 caliber round that is highly accurate and used during potentially lethal encounters. The .308 is capable of defeating soft body armor at greater distances.

I. Defiance bolt action precision rifles. Purchase cost: $15,609. Quantity: 3.

II. Accuracy International AT series bolt action rifle. Purchase cost: $4,462.

Quantity: 1.

III. Hornady .308 155 grain ELD Match TAP ammunition. Purchase cost:
$6,720. Quantity: 3,200.
b. Purpose:

19.86 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 14
To provide officers with the ability to address lethal threats with more precision, at greater distances than a Carbine rifle or handgun are capable. c. Authorized Use:

Only those officers assigned to the ESU Tactical team, and who have been selected as members of the Precision Rifle team may use these weapons. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable department policies, including but not limited to, Use of Force-300, Firearms-306 and ESU Tactical Team-404. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize firearms and ammunition only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force. e. Required Training:

Officers assigned to the Precision Rifle Team are required to attend and pass a POST certified basic Precision Rifle course before they are permitted to use these weapons.
f. Expected Lifespan:

I. Defiance Precision Rifles, no expiration date. They will need parts and service as they become worn or break.

II. Accuracy International AT Series Rifle, no expiration date. It will need parts and service as they become worn or break.

III. Hornady 155 grain ELD Match TAP, no expiration date. g. Fiscal Impact:

I. Precision rifles, $0-$1,000 per fiscal year.

II. Hornady Ammunition, $0-$6,720 per fiscal year.

10. Flashbang, Teargas and Pepper balls (Category 12)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

Noise, Flash, Diversionary Devices (NFDD) commonly referred to as “flashbangs” are single use devices that emits a loud bang and a very bright flash. They are designed to disorient and distract dangerous subjects by overwhelming their senses and provide a window of time, approximately 6-8 seconds, for officers to take control of dangerous or high-risk situations.

Additionally, the SCPD possess “Stinger Grenades.” This device is a rubber ball that contains a small NFDD in addition to 60 .32 caliber rubber balls. When used, the grenade separates along its hemisphere and expels the balls while simultaneously giving a loud bang and bright flash. These are useful in crowd control or riot situations as a means to disperse groups of violent individuals in addition to the disorienting effect of the NFDD component to mitigate dangerous behavior. These can be purchased in configurations that include OC/CS (2chlorobenzylidene malononitrile/Oleoresin Capsicum) agent dispersing capabilities, inert powders or simply the .32 caliber balls.

I. 8902NR 12 gram low roll NFDD. Purchase cost: $2,426. Quantity: 40.

II. 7007 4 gram NFDD training reloads. Purchase cost $955. Quantity: 26.

III. 1090 Stinger Grenades. Purchase cost $523. Quantity: 10. b. Purpose:

To produce a loud noise, overpressure and a very bright flash, that can cause temporary psychological and physiological deprivation and give officers an advantage in high-risk tactical situations. Generally, NFDD (not including stinger

19.87 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 15
grenades) are not a primary device used in riot situations, however there are narrow instances requiring authorization of the incident commander where they could be used.
c. Authorized Use:

Only those officers who are trained in the use of the devices are authorized to use them. Currently the only officers trained in the use of these devices are members of the ESU Tactical team. Use of NFDD is controlled by SCPD policy and best practice. Situations where an NFDD may be used include but are not limited to: hostage or barricaded subject situations, high-risk warrant service (arrest/search) where risk to officers is extremely high; during any other high risk situation where use of an NFDD may increase officer safety or training. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable department policies, including but not limited to Use of Force-300, ESU tactical Team-404, Control Devices and Techniques-302. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize these devices only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force. e. Required Training:

Officers must attend department training regarding the use of these items. This training includes SCPD policy, legal obligations and reporting requirements.

Instructors must attend a 40 hour POST certified instructor course regarding the use of chemical agents, NFDD and deployment platforms, in addition to manufacture specific instructor certifications. The SCPD maintains officers who are POST certified as instructors of chemical munitions, NFDD and launching platforms. These officers in turn train other members of the department. f. Expected Lifespan:

I. 8902NR 12 gram low roll NFDD- 5 years.

II. 7007 4 gram NFDD training reloads- 5 years.
g. Fiscal Impact:

I. 8902NR 12 gram low roll NFDD-$0-$2000 per year.

II. 7007 4 gram NFDD training reloads $0-$832 per year.

11. Chemical Agents “Teargas” (Category 12)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

The SCPD uses chemical agents, commonly referred to as “teargas” as less lethal tools to disperse rioting subjects or on barricaded subjects. The two agents the SCPD uses are CS (2-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile) and OC (Oleoresin Capsicum). CS is an irritating agent and a lachrymator. It irritates the eyes and causes tearing while also irritating the respiratory system causing coughing.

These reactions are temporary and quickly subside especially if the subjects remove themselves from the area where the chemical agent has been deployed.

The U.S Army has tested CS extensively. There are no known allergic reactions to CS. OC is an, inflammatory agent. It causes a burning sensation, involuntary closure of the eyes and tightness in the chest. These symptoms generally subside within an hour or less of exposure. OC is legal for civilians to possess in certain quantities.

I. 1082 Riot Control CS Canister. Purchase cost: $352. Quantity: 12.

Pyrotechnic device used in outdoor situations to disperse rioting crowds,

19.88 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 16
should not be used indoors due to risk of fire. Releases 75.6 grams of CS in 20-40 seconds.

II. 1032 Tri-Chamber Flameless CS Canister. Purchase cost: $647. Quantity:

14. Pyrotechnic device designed to be used indoors and presents a minimal risk of fire. Hand delivered only. Releases 20 grams of agent in 20- 30 seconds.

III. 5230B Baffled Launchable CS canister. Purchase cost: $416. Quantity:

10. Pyrotechnic device, designed to be launched from the launching shotgun. For use indoors and presents minimal risk of fire. Releases 25 grams of agent in 20-40 seconds.

IV. 1026 Triple Chaser separating canister. Purchase cost: $1,047. Quantity:

20. Pyrotechnic device, designed to be used outdoors in riot control situations. It is a canister, that when deployed separates into three smaller canisters. It allows officers to deploy chemical agents over a larger area with less munitions. Releases 92 grams of agent between three separate smaller canisters over 20-30 seconds.

V. 56854 Aerosol OC Fogger. Purchase cost: $89. Quantity: 4. Nonpyrotechnic canister. This canister sprays OC with the aid of compressed air. It is designed to be used indoors or in vehicles. It has no risk of fire. It will release a 1.3% OC spray over 15-25 seconds.

VI. 2262 40mm CS Liquid Ferret projectile. Purchase cost: $1,238. Quantity:

44. Non-pyrotechnic launched projectile. This munition is fired from a 40mm less lethal launcher. It is a hardened projectile intended to be used to defeat barriers such as glass and thin wooden barriers. When it penetrates or impacts a hard surface, it disperses liquid CS agent into the area. These are not for use against people.

VII. 2260 40mm OC Liquid Ferret projectile. Purchase cost: $289. Quantity:

10. Non-pyrotechnic launched projectile. This munition is fired from a 40mm less lethal launcher. It is a hardened projectile intended to be used to defeat barriers such as glass and thin wooden barriers. When it penetrates or impacts a hard surface, it disperses liquid OC agent into the area. These are not for use against people.
b. Purpose:

To limit escalating situations where lethal force is prohibited or undesirable.

Situations where these munitions would be deployed include, but are not limited to: self-destructive, dangerous or combative individuals; riot or crowd control situations or other violent civil unrest; situations where use of the munitions would provide a tactical advantage; training or authorized demonstration. A “tactical advantage” could include but is not limited to: deployment into a structure or vehicle where an armed violent/self-destructive subject is barricaded; or a riot situation where, deployment can either create an environment that causes violent persons to disperse or leave the area or limit the advance of a violent group or deny a violent group access to specific areas or law enforcement. c. Authorized Use:

Only officers trained in the use of these munitions may use them. This includes officers assigned to the ESU Tactical team and officers assigned as “grenadiers” during a crowd control or violent civil unrest situation.

19.89 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 17
d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

To be used in accordance with Penal Code section 13652 (AB 48). All applicable policies, including but not limited to Use of Force-300, ESU Tactical team-404 and Control Devices and techniques-302. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force. e. Required Training:

Officers must attend department training regarding the use of these items. This training includes SCPD policy, legal obligations and reporting requirements.

Instructors must attend a 40 hour POST certified instructor course regarding the use of chemical agents, NFDD and deployment platforms, in addition to manufacture specific instructor certifications. The SCPD maintains officers who are POST certified as instructors of chemical munitions, NFDD and launching platforms. These officers in turn train the other members of the department. f. Expected Lifespan:

I. 1082 Riot Control CS Canister-5 years.

II. 1032 Tri-Chamber Flameless CS Canister-5 years.

III. 5230B Baffled Launchable CS canister-5 years.

IV. 1026 Triple Chaser separating canister-5 years.

V. 56854 Aerosol OC Fogger-5 years.

VI. 2262 40mm CS Liquid Ferret projectile-5 years.

VII. 2260 40mm OC Liquid Ferret projectile-5 years.
g. Fiscal Impact:

All chemical munitions $0-$5,000 per fiscal year based on fiscal budgeting.

12. Pepper Ball Guns and Pepper Balls (Category 12)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost.

I. Pepper ball guns. Purchase cost. $1,399. Quantity: 4. Pepper ball guns are a compressed air powered launcher, almost identical in manufacture to a common paintball gun. It fires .68 caliber plastic balls that contain an irritant powder. The pepper ball gun can fire pepper balls up to 60 feet and can launch pepper balls farther to saturate an area.

II. Pepper Balls. Purchase cost: $967 (per container). Quantity: 4 (containers of 375 pepper balls). Pepper Balls are .68 caliber projectiles.

They are a plastic shell that contains an irritant powder that consists of PAVA, a pepper derivative. This powder causes a burning sensation and involuntary eye closure when coupled with the impact of the projectile. It is used for pain compliance and disorientation.
b. Purpose:

To limit escalating situations where lethal force is prohibited or undesirable.

Situations where these munitions would be deployed, include: Self destructive, dangerous or combative individuals; riot or crowd control situations or other violent civil unrest; situations where use of the munitions would provide a tactical advantage; training or authorized demonstration. A “tactical advantage” could include but is not limited to: deployment into a structure or vehicle where an armed violent/self-destructive subject is barricaded, or a riot situation where, deployment can either create an environment that causes violent persons to

19.90 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 18
disperse or leave the area or limit the advance of a violent group or deny a violent group access to specific areas or law enforcement.
c. Authorized Use:

Only officers who are certified to use the pepper ball system. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

To be used in accordance with Penal Code section 13652 (AB 48). All applicable policies including but not limited to Use of Force-300, Control Devices and Techniques-302. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize pepper ball guns and pepper balls only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force. e. Required Training:

Officers must attend a manufacturer specific training course to be certified to use the pepper ball systems.
f. Expected Lifespan:

I. Pepper ball guns, no expiration. They will need parts and service as they wear out or break.

II. Pepper Balls, 2 years.
g. Fiscal Impact
Pepper ball guns, $0-$500 per year. Pepper
Balls $0-$500 per year.

13. Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) (Category 13)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

GENASYS Inc. LRAD-100X. Purchase cost: $8,179.77. Quantity: 1. This device is a self-contained, lightweight, battery operated hailer that communicates with great intelligibility up to 600 meters. It emits acoustic sound pressure levels up to 140db. It provides clear unmistakable, intelligible communications and stunning alert tones and can play pre-recorded audio messages, mp3 audio files and live broadcasting via a handheld microphone. It can broadcast tones at a volume that causes discomfort to those who hear the tones. The device provides directional sound capabilities allowing the user to direct the uncomfortable tones at a specific person or group of persons.
b. Purpose:

To serve as a notification/communication system during critical incidents, where the user is conveying a message to a person or persons. To be used during violent or riotous situations as a means to advise participants that they are involved in legally prohibited activities. To be used to broadcast alert tones in a directed manner at persons involved in riotous or destructive behavior as a means of dispersing the crowd and stopping the behavior. This device provides the SCPD with the ability to address violent persons or groups of persons during a riot or other violent crowd control situation without the use of kinetic less lethal weapons such 40mm launchers or chemical agents, allowing SCPD to attempt de-escalation via less forceful means.
c. Authorized Use:

Only officers who are trained in its use, with the authorization of an incident commander, may use this device.

19.91 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 19
d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable policies including but not limited to Use of Force-300, Control Devices and Techniques-302. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize the LRAD only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law.
e. Required Training:

Officers must attend a department specified training to use this device. f. Expected Lifespan:
20-25 years. Repairs completed as needed.
g. Fiscal Impact:

No known fiscal impact, the device is new.

14. 40mm Projectile Launchers (Category 14)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

The 40mm projectile launcher is a Less Lethal platform. It is not a firearm and is not capable of firing any military grade explosive projectile. It is designed to fire a projectile designed to be used against persons in situations where lethal force is prohibited. It allows officers to use Less Lethal Direct Impact spins stabilized munitions at distances up to 120 feet. The munitions cause pain compliance via blunt force impact. They can incapacitate violent subjects armed with weapons that are not firearms, allowing officers to safely take a subject into custody. The standoff capabilities allow officers to apply force via the impact rounds and assess if further application of force is required. This mitigates the need for officers to approach a violent/armed subject, reducing the chances of a lethal force scenario.

I. Defense Technologies DT1325 40mm-single barrel launchers. Purchase cost: $11,620. Quantity: 14. (No longer manufactured)
II. Lewis Machine and Tool (LMT) 1425 40mm single barrel launchers.

Purchase cost: $12,450. Quantity: 15.

III. Lewis Machine and Tool (LMT) 1440 40mm 4 shot multi launchers.

Purchase cost: $3,798. Quantity: 2.

IV. Penn Arms PGL65-40 40mm 6 shot multi launcher. Purchase cost:

Approximately $3,000. Quantity: 1.
b. Purpose:

To be used as a less lethal tool, to apply pain compliance to self-destructive, armed or combative/resistive persons, to prevent the person from causing harm to themselves or others. Also used during violent riots or large crowd control disturbances. They can be used to mark persons engaged in the above activity making the person(s) identifiable for arrest.
c. Authorized Use:

Only officers who have completed a department training course may deploy these less lethal tools. Every patrol vehicle has a single launcher in it for use by patrol officers. Only officers specifically trained in the use and application during a crowd control or riotous situation may use them in those instances. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

To be used in accordance with Penal Code section 13652 (AB 48). All applicable policies, including but not limited to, Use of Force-300, Control Devices and Techniques-302 and Emergency services Tactical Team-404. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize these devices only for official law enforcement purposes, and

19.92 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 20
pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force. e. Required Training:

Officers must attend department training regarding the use of these items. This training includes SCPD policy, legal obligations and reporting requirements.

Instructors must attend a 40 hour POST certified instructor course regarding the use of chemical agents, NFDD and deployment platforms, in addition to manufacture specific instructor certifications. The SCPD maintains officers who are POST certified as instructors of chemical munitions, NFDD and launching platforms. These officers in turn train other members of the department. f. Expected Lifespan:

I. Defense Technologies DT1325 40mm-single barrel launchers: No expiration. No longer manufactured. Will be serviced or repaired as long as viable.

II. Lewis Machine and Tool (LMT) 1425 40mm single barrel launchers: No expiration. Will need parts and service when they wear out or break.

III. Lewis Machine and Tool (LMT) 1440 40mm 4 shot multi launchers: No expiration. Will need parts and service when they wear out or break.

IV. Penn Arms PGL65-40 40mm 6 shot multi launcher: No expiration. Will need parts and service when it wears out or breaks.
g. Fiscal Impact:

For all of the listed launchers: $0-500 per year.

15. 40mm ammunition: (Category 14)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:
40mm ammunition meant to be used in 40mm Projectile Launchers described above. All of the 40mm rounds in this section are approved for use against people if the force is justified. SCPD has three impact munitions, the Exact Impact is a less lethal projectile made of a foam rubber often called a “sponge round” with a consistency similar to a sponge. It is fired using smokeless powder and is designed to incapacitate people through pain compliance and impact. It is blue in color and can be fired from ranges between 5’ and 120’. The Direct Impact round is an impact munition that carries a powder payload within the projectile.

The payload can be a chemical agent powder or it can contain an inert marking powder. These munitions provide the same less lethal pain compliance/deescalation/violence mitigation functions as the Exact Impact munitions, with the added benefit of an irritant powder, or the ability to make a riotous subject identifiable for arrest. The SCPD also uses reusable training ammunition that allow true to real training at lower cost.

I. eXact Impact 40mm: Purchase cost: $4,011. Quantity: 140.

II. Direct Impact 40mm OC. Purchase cost: $732. Quantity: 24.

III. Direct Impact 40mm Marking. Purchase cost: $970. Quantity: 32.

IV. Training Sponge ammunition 24 round kit. Purchase cost: $2,537.

Quantity: 7.
b. Purpose:

To be used as a less lethal tool in situations where lethal force is prohibited. To

19.93 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 21
assist officers in intervening in violent or potentially violent situations by use of pain compliance. To allow officers the ability to apply less lethal force from distance or behind cover, which provides time to assess the effect of the force used and re-apply or discontinue force as the situation allows. c. Authorized Use:

Only officers who are trained in the use of these projectiles are authorized to use them. Situations where use may be authorized include but are not limited to:
armed self-destructive individuals, violent resistive individuals, violent riotous individuals, situations where use would increase safety and mitigate the need for higher uses of force, authorized training or demonstrations. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

To be used in accordance with Penal Code section 13652 (AB 48). All applicable policies including but not limited to Use of Force-300, Control Devices and Techniques-302. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize these devices only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
e. Required Training:

Officers must attend department training regarding the use of these items. This training includes SCPD policy, legal obligations and reporting requirements.

Instructors must attend a 40 hour POST certified instructor course regarding the use of chemical agents, NFDD and deployment platforms, in addition to manufacture specific instructor certifications. The SCPD maintains officers who are POST certified as instructors of chemical munitions, NFDD and launching platforms. These officers in turn train other members of the department. f. Expected Lifespan:

I. eXact Impact 40mm-5 years.

II. Direct Impact 40mm OC-5 years.

III. Direct Impact 40mm Marking-5 years.

IV. Training Sponge ammunition 24 round kit-5 years.
g. Fiscal Impact:
$0- 5,000 per year. Given the 5 year life span of these munitions, the SCPD may not need to purchase more every fiscal year.

16. Other Specified Items/Equipment (Category 15)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities and purchase cost:

The department currently issues AR-15/M4 style Carbine rifles to its officers as a means of addressing potential lethal force situations. The department issues two brands, Colt and Lewis Machine and Tool (LMT). The Carbine rifle is a lightweight, gas operated, air-cooled, shoulder fired, semi-automatic, magazine fed weapon. It is capable at providing accurate fire at various distances. The Hornady 5.56x45mm NATO, 75 grain BTHP (Boat Tail Hollow Point) TAP (Tactical Application Police) is the current standard issue rifle ammunition for all carbines in the department. This ammunition type is a medium caliber rifle round.

It is capable of defeating soft body armor a subject may be wearing, as well as other intermediate barriers. The duty round is specifically designed to limit over

19.94 Santa Cruz Police Department
Santa Cruz PD-CA, Policy Manual
April 20265 Military Equipment - 22
penetration thus mitigating danger to innocent persons or other officers. SCPD uses ammunition of the same caliber ammunition for training purposes.

Generally, the training ammunition is 55 grain full metal jacket ammunition. This type of ammunition is solely for training purposes. The cost of the training ammunition is less than that of the duty ammunition.

I. Colt LE6920 Carbines. Purchase cost: $31,350. Quantity: 33.

II. Colt Sporter Carbines. Purchase cost: $1,900. Quantity 2.

III. LMT Carbines. Purchase cost: $49,000. Quantity: 35.

IV. Hornady 5.56x45mm NATO, 75 grain BTHP TAP. Purchase cost:
$4,560. Quantity: 5,700. SCPD does not have to order duty ammunition every fiscal year.

V. .223/5.56 55 grain full metal jacket is the standard training round the department uses. The manufacturer of the ammunition varies based on what is available at the time the department needs to make an order. Quantity: 35,500. Cost: $12,070.
b. Purpose:

The Carbine rifle provides officers the ability to employ a more precise weapon in potential lethal force encounters. It provides officers the ability address armed violent subjects at a greater distance than with a handgun. It provides officers with the ability to defeat soft body armor and intermediate barriers when addressing armed violent subjects.
c. Authorized Use:

Only officers who have completed a POST required 16 hour training course are authorized to use the carbine rifle and associated ammunition. d. Legal and Procedural Rules:

All applicable department policies, including but not limited to, Use of Force-300, Firearms-306. It is the policy of the SCPD to utilize firearms and ammunition only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
e. Required Training:

All officers are required to attend a POST required 16 hour Patrol Rifle course before they are permitted to use these weapons. Currently this course is mandatory for all officers after graduating the Academy, before beginning the Field Training Program
f. Expected Lifespan:

Carbine Rifles, approximately 20 years. Service is performed as needed and parts are replaced as they become worn or break.

Hornady TAP 75 grain 5.56x45mm NATO, no expiration.
.223/5.56x45 training ammunition, no expiration.
g. Fiscal Impact:

Carbine Rifles: $0-$12,000 per fiscal year.

Ammunition: $0-$40,000 per fiscal year.

19.95 Brittany Inclan
From: Peter Gelblum <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2026 1:45 PM
To: City Council; Bonnie Bush; Scott Newsome; Renee Golder; Sonja Brunner; Gabriela Trigueiro; Fred Keeley; Susie O'Hara; Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson Subject: Item 19 on Agenda for April 28, 2026 City Council meeting - SCPD AB 481 Annual Report
Dear Mayor and Council members:

I have the following comments regarding SCPD's 2025 AB 481 Annual Report, after reviewing the report, attending the community meeting, and listening to the April 22 Public Safety Committee meeting:

Categories 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, and 15:

AB 481 (Govt Code Section 7072(a)(4)) requires SCPD to include in its Annual Report "(4) The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report."
In direct violation of this provision, SCPD's Annual Report for Categories 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, and 15 states in one form or another, "Annual costs for personnel, transportation, and storage are absorbed into the Department’s operating budget."
The Council should direct the SCPD to comply with State law and provide the requested detailed information. The statements in the report provide no clue as to the costs that AB 481 requires SCPD to report. The source of the funds is irrelevant.

Category 12 - Flashbang, Teargas, and Pepper Balls:

The report states: " Intended Acquisition in 2026 - Consumable equipment acquisitions for 2026 will restore quantities previously approved by the City Council." This is not appropriate. AB 481 requires each and every acquisition of listed equipment to be approved before acquisition, and the report must list the quantity and cost for the intended acquisition. SCPD cannot use a prior approval. Govt Code Section 7072(a)(4) and (6). Among other things, the Council and the public need to know the cost of the new acquisition, which may not be the same as the prior acquisition.

Category 14/40 mm Ammunition:

The report states: " Intended Acquisition in 2026 Consumable equipment acquisitions for 2026 will restore quantities previously approved by the City Council."

19.96 Again, for the reasons stated above, this is not appropriate. AB 481 requires each and every acquisition of listed equipment to be approved before acquisition, and the report must list the quantity and cost for the intended acquisition. SCPD cannot use a prior approval. Govt Code Section 7072(a)(4) and (6).

Category 15 (Other):

The report states: " No AR/15 patrol rifles were used in lethal force situations during the reporting period."
AB 481 requires reporting of every use, lethal or otherwise. At the PSC meeting, a SCPD representative explained that every time an assault rifle is displayed, this action is recorded by the officer on a form. Thus, SCPD has the information it needs to report on all uses of the rifles, not just in lethal situations, and the AB 481 report must include those uses.

The report also states: " Consumable equipment acquisitions for 2026 will restore quantities previously approved by the City Council."
Again, for the reasons stated above, this is not appropriate. AB 481 requires each and every acquisition of listed equipment to be approved before acquisition, and the report must list the quantity and cost for the intended acquisition. SCPD cannot use a prior approval more than once. Govt Code Section 7072(a)(4) and (6).

Thank you for your considered attention to these important issues. --
Peter Gelblum
Chair, Santa Cruz County Chapter
ACLU of Northern California

19.97 2025 AB 481 Military
Equipment Report
City Council

19.98 Policy
May 10, 2022, City of Santa Cruz
City Council adopted SCMC Chapter

9.90, approving the SCPD Military
Equipment Use Policy (705)
(Gov't Code § 7071)
• Authorized Use
• Fiscal Impact
• Legal & Procedural
Rules
• Training
• Description
• Quantity
• Capabilities
• Lifespan
• Purpose
Reporting
A law enforcement agency must
submit to their governing body an
annual military equipment report for
each type of military equipment
approved by the governing body
w ithin one year of approval, and
annually thereafter for as long as
the military equipment is available
for use. (Gov't Code § 7072(a))
Approval
AB 481 requires a governing body to
review the ordinance adopting a
military equipment use policy at least
annually and to vote on whether to
renew the ordinance at a regular
meeting; and shall determine, based
on the annual military equipment
report w hether each type of military
equipment identified in that report
complies w ith the standards for
approval (Gov’t Code § 7071(e)(1,2))
Safeguard
Establishes legally enforceable
safeguards, including transparency,
oversight, and accountability
measures to protect the public’s
w elfare, safety, civil rights, and civil
liberties before military equipment
is funded, acquired, or used. (Gov’t
Code § 7071(d)(1))
Effective January 1, 2022, establishes
requirements for the funding, acquisition and use
of items deemed "military equipment" (Gov't Code
§ 7070(c)) in law enforcement and state agencies.

Assem bly Bill 481

19.99 Gov't Code § 7070(c)
01 Robot & Unmanned
Aerial Vehicle (UAS)
02 & 03 Armored
Personnel Carrier
05 Command &
Control and Transport
Vehicles
Santa Cruz Police Department Military Equipment

19.100
Gov't Code § 7070(c)
10 Specialized Firearms
and Ammunition Less
than .50 Caliber
08 & 09 Firearms and
Ammunition Greater
than .50 Caliber
12 Flashbang, Teargas
& Pepper Balls
Santa Cruz Police Department Military Equipment

19.101
Gov't Code § 7070(c)
14 40mm Launchers &
Ammunition
13 Long Range Acoustic
Device
15 Other Specified
Items/Equipment
Santa Cruz Police Department Military Equipment

19.102
Gov't Code § 7072(a)(1)
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
1 - Robot
1 - UAS
2&3 - Armored Personnel Carrier
5 - Transport Vehicle
5 - Command & Control Vehicle
8 - Firearms Greater than .50
9 - Ammunition Greater than .50 Caliber
10 -Firearms & Ammunition less than .50 caliber
12- Flashbang, Teargas and Pepper Balls
13 -Long Range Acoustic Device
14 - 40 MM Projectile Launcher & Ammunition
15 - Other Specified Items/Equipment
Field (Use & Display)
Demonstration
Training
Assist Other Department
Refueling
Maintenance
Reporting Period: January 1, 2025-December 31, 2025
Santa Cruz Police Department Military Equipment Use

19.103
Assist W atsonville PD (3)
Refuel (2)
Training (2)
Maintenance (1)
Armored Personnel Carrier BearCat
Department EventRecruitment Video (1) Assist Reno PD (1) Security Detail –
W harf to W harf (1)
Gov't Code § 7072(a)(1)

19.104
Santa Cruz Police Department Military Equipment Costs
Gov't Code § 7072(a)(4)
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
$22,014.11
$72,891.07
$150,599.99
$32,781.12

19.105
Costs
Gov't Code § 7072(a)(4)
Throw Bot, $8,404.00 , 3%
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle,
$66,600.95 , 24%
Armored Personnel
Carrier, $1,783.89 , 1%
Transport Vehicles,
$846.60 , 0%
Command & Control
Vehicles, $86,663.87 , 31%
Specialized Firearms &
Ammunition < .50 Caliber,
$35,750.35 , 13%
Flashbang, Teargas, Pepper
Balls, $9,338.88 , 3%
40mm Launchers &
Ammunition, $4,669.44 , 2%
Other Specified
Items/Equipment,
$64,228.31 , 23%
Santa Cruz Police Department Military Equipment Costs

19.106
Policy 705, section 705.10
– Use in Exigent
Circumstances (Page 4)
Proposed
Revision
Revised language that is more consistent with the City Council’s prior direction on April 22, 2025
Santa Cruz Police Department Policy Update
Gov't Code § 7072(a)
Policy 705, Military Use
Equipment List, Category 1
– Unmanned Aerial System
(Page 7-9)
Proposed
Addition
Two (2) Skydio R10 Interior UAS Units – Description, quantity, capabilities, authorized uses, lifespan, and fiscal impact

19.107
Intended Acquisition in 2026
Gov't Code § 7072(a)
Object Avoidance Technology
Built-in Lighting and Two-Way
Communication
Up to Three (3) Hours of Battery Life
Rugged with Turtle Mode
Santa Cruz Police Department Military Equipment
No Payload or Attached Equipment

19.108
Intended Acquisition in 2026
Gov't Code § 7071(d)(1)
Safeguards
Fourth Amendment Protections
(Search & Seizure),
Policy #705 (Military Equipment),
Policy #607 (Unmanned Aerial System)
Uses
Search & Rescue, Warrant, AOD,
Barricaded Subject, Training, etc.

Cost
Five Year Contract for $29,177 per UAS
Santa Cruz Police Department Military Equipment

19.109
2025 AB 481 Military
Equipment Report
City Council

19.110
City Council

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: 04/16/2026
AGENDA OF: 04/28/2026
DEPARTMENT: City Manager/Public Works
SUBJECT: 2026 Annual Update on Projects in the 5-year Roadmap for West Cliff to Advance the Community’s 50-year Community Vision for West Cliff (CM/PW)
LOCATION: Districts 3 and 6
RECOMMENDATION: Receive a status update on the five projects identified in the City Council adopted 5-year Roadmap for West Cliff along with an update on additional West Cliff related projects.

BACKGROUND: During the January 2023 storms, West Cliff Drive and areas of coastline along that corridor were severely damaged by large swells, causing portions of the roadway and path to fail, and impacting public access points, utility infrastructure, and the surrounding neighborhoods. In response, the City Council directed staff to prepare a 50-year Community Vision for West Cliff. This Vision was co-created with the community to capture aspirations and future uses for West Cliff, considering long-term resource allocations and building disaster resilience.
50-year Community Vision for West Cliff - The City Council approved the 50-year Community Vision for West Cliff (Vision) on April 9, 2024 after robust staff engagement with approximately 2,160 community touch points through in person and virtual meetings (540), surveys (500), and public opinion research including responses from 1,120 individuals. 5-year Roadmap for West Cliff - In August 2024, the City began developing a 5-year Roadmap for West Cliff (Roadmap) to identify and prioritize projects to begin implementation of the Vision. This included months of community engagement, public meetings, and surveys that informed how projects were prioritized for inclusion in the Roadmap. The City also established the West Cliff Implementation Committee (WCIC) which provided regular guidance throughout the Roadmap development process. After extensive community feedback on project prioritization, collected both in person and online, priority projects were reviewed by the WCIC.

With guidance from the WCIC and the community, along with discussions with regulatory agencies, the City considered the capacity of each department to begin and complete projects within the 5-year Roadmap timeframe. This resulted in the launch of the Vision through the Council approval of the following five projects over the course of the 5-year Roadmap:

20.1 1. Revetment Repair Project

2. Lighthouse Field Roadway Relocation

3. Santa Cruz Coastal Change Monitoring Network

4. West Cliff Infrastructure Financing Feasibility Study

5. Corridor-wide Master Signage Plan and Design Standards The City had conversations with regulatory and resource agencies regarding the permitting feasibility of some of the project concepts along West Cliff. It is important to note that while these agencies are open to hybrid approaches (e.g., grey/green solutions), the City does not have assurance that a project will be permitted by these agencies until the agencies have reviewed a fully formed project proposal resulting from a robust alternatives analysis.

DISCUSSION: With guidance from the community and direction from the City Council, the City has been able to make progress on key Roadmap projects that both advance the Vision while being nimble and responsive to the changing needs of the West Cliff corridor. Since approval of the Roadmap, additional storm related damages have been added to the greater management of the area as staff prioritize time and funding resources. To provide a full picture of the investments being made to this important community resource, the 5-Year Roadmap for West Cliff 2026 Annual Update (attached) provides a status of the Roadmap specific projects along with highlights from other planned projects and new emergency work being implemented along the West Cliff corridor over the past year.

While the 5-year Roadmap identifies five priority projects for implementation, it is important to note that the unpredictability of Santa Cruz’s dynamic coastline may require the City to reassess priorities as needed. Additionally, the five Roadmap projects are not necessarily the only efforts that will be advanced in this timeline. The City has and will continue to manage any emerging needs as projects arise due to changing conditions balancing them with the existing Roadmap projects.

The 5-Year Roadmap for West Cliff 2026 Annual Update provides a summary of the project status for the both the Roadmap specific projects, as well as other investments and improvements throughout the West Cliff area. Detailed descriptions of each Roadmap project, including estimated costs, timelines, and their associated alignment with the Vision are included in the 2025 Council approved 5-year Roadmap for West Cliff (Attached).

The status of the five projects approved as part of the 5-year Roadmap is summarized below and in the 5-year Roadmap for West Cliff 2026 Annual Update (attached):

1. Revetment Repair Project
 Advanced planning and coordination for revetment repairs, including funding strategy, design scoping, and priority site assessments. Additional State funding opportunities are being actively pursued to support next phases of work (estimated completion: 2030).

2. Lighthouse Field Roadway Relocation
 Completed 30% design and under review, with CEQA process underway and Coastal Permit submittal planned for 2026. Right-of-way acquisition in progress, and the project remains on track for 2027 construction (estimated completion: 2027).

20.2 3. Santa Cruz Coastal Change Monitoring Network
 Refining cost-effective methods and piloting new technologies such as drone mapping and camera-based analysis. Regional coordination through the California Coastal Accelerator is underway, with initial monitoring, pursuant to new Local Coastal Program (LCP) requirements, anticipated to begin in spring 2026 (ongoing).

4. West Cliff Infrastructure Financing Feasibility Study  Through the California Coastal Accelerator, baseline data has been compiled.

Currently scoping the study to assess asset risk, project costs, and funding strategies across three coastal areas. Initial analysis is underway with recommendations anticipated by 2027 (estimated completion: 2028).

5. Corridor-wide Master Signage Plan and Design Standards  Project scope and priorities have been defined to support cohesive design standards for the West Cliff corridor. Staff are preparing for consultant support and public engagement, with funding now targeted for FY28 (estimated completion: 2028).

In addition to the five proposed projects identified in the 5-year Roadmap, the City has made significant progress on existing projects along the West Cliff corridor.

Additional projects completed:
 West Cliff - Bethany Curve Culvert Project (2024 – 2026) – Completed  West Cliff Drive Stabilization Project (2024-2026) - Completed  Living shorelines, Nature-Based Solutions, and Sand Management Feasibility Study (2024 –2025) Completed, now moving into furthering recommended concepts.