Cities Index.
Agenda packet, special meeting, first session

Santa Fe Springs City Council
January 11, 2024

Document
Agenda packet, special meeting, first session
Meeting
January 11, 2024
Body
Santa Fe Springs City Council
Pages
25
Original file
15.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.santafesprings.gov. That file is the official record.

Agenda
2024.1.11 - AGENDA - SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING.PDF
Meeting Materials
2024.1.11 - AGENDA PACKET - SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING.PDF

1. Documents:

2. Documents:

CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS

SPECIAL MEETINGS OF THE HOUSING SUCCESSOR,

SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
THURSDAY, JANUARY 11, 2024
AT 6:00 P.M.

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11710 TELEGRAPH ROAD
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670

CITY COUNCIL
Jay Sarno, Mayor
William K. Rounds, Mayor Pro Tem
Juanita Martin, Councilmember
Annette Rodriguez, Councilmember
Joe Angel Zamora, Councilmember

CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY
René Bobadilla, P.E. Ivy M. Tsai

CITY STAFF
Assistant City Manager Nicholas Razo
Fire Chief Chad Van Meeteren
Police Chief Aviv Bar
Director of Community Services Maricela Balderas
Director of Finance Lana Dich
Director of Planning Wayne Morrell
Director of Police Services Dino Torres
Director of Public Works James Enriquez
City Clerk Janet Martinez
January 11, 2024: Special City Council Meeting Page 2 of 7

NOTICES
This City Council Meeting (“Council”) will be held in person and will meet at City Hall – City Council Chambers, 11710 E. Telegraph Road, Santa Fe Springs, California. The meeting will be live streamed on the City’s YouTube Channel and can be accessed on the City’s website via the following link:
https://santafesprings.org/city_council/city_council_meetings/index.php Americans with Disabilities Act: In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Clerk’s Office. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

SB 1439: Effective January 1, 2023, City Council Members are subject to SB 1439 and cannot participate in certain decisions for a year after accepting campaign contributions of more than $250 from an interested person. The Council Member would need to disclose the donation and abstain from voting.

Public Comments: The public is encouraged to address City Council on any matter listed on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the City Council on the day of the meeting, please fill out a speaker card provided at the door and submit it to City Clerk staff. You may also submit comments in writing by sending them to the City Clerk's Office at [email protected]. All written comments received by 12:00 p.m. the day of the City Council Meeting will be distributed to the City Council and made a part of the official record of the meeting. Written comments will not be read at the meeting, only the name of the person submitting the comment will be announced. Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future City Council meeting.

Please Note: Staff reports and supplemental attachments are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk in City Hall, during regular business hours 7:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m., Monday – Thursday. Telephone: (562) 868-0511.

January 11, 2024: Special City Council Meeting Page 3 of 7

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

INVOCATION

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

INTRODUCTIONS

PRESENTATIONS

1. 2023 HOLIDAY HOME DECORATING CONTEST WINNERS (COMMUNITY

SERVICES)

2. TREE LIGHTING & SANTA FLOAT PROGRAMS RECAP (COMMUNITY

SERVICES)

3. HOLIDAY BASKET PROGRAMS RECAP (COMMUNITY SERVICES)

4. 2023 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT END OF YEAR RECAP OF

EVENTS (COMMUNITY SERVICES)

CHANGES TO AGENDA

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA AND AGENDA ITEMS
At this time, the general public may address the City Council on both non-agenda and agenda items. Please be aware that the maximum time allotted for members of the public to speak shall not exceed three (3) minutes per speaker. State Law prohibits the City Council from taking action or entertaining extended discussion on a topic not listed on the agenda.

Please show courtesy to others and direct all of your comments to the Mayor.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS ON ITEMS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENDA – NONE

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

PUBLIC HEARING

5. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED ZONE TEXT AMENDMENTS TO ENSURE THAT THE CITY’S ZONING ORDINANCE IS ALIGNED WITH THE STATE’S ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNIT (JADU) STATUTES AND FIND THAT THE AMENDMENTS ARE

EXEMPT FROM CEQA (PLANNING)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:

January 11, 2024: Special City Council Meeting Page 4 of 7 1) Open the Public Hearing and receive the written and oral staff report and any comments from the public regarding the proposed zone text amendments related to ADU and JADU regulations; and
2) Find and determine that the proposed zone text amendments are consistent with the goals, policies, and program of the City’s General Plan; and 3) Find and determine that the proposed zone text amendments are consistent with the State’s ADU and JADU regulations; and
4) Find and determine that this Project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 21080.17 which provides an exemption for the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (the state ADU law); and
5) Waive further reading and introduce Ordinance No. 1134 by title, adopting Zone Text Amendments to ensure that the City’s Zoning Ordinance is aligned with the State’s Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU) statutes; and
6) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

6. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DECISION TO APPROVE ZONE DETERMINATION CASE NO. 2023-01: A REQUEST TO DETERMINE THAT A BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE

SYSTEM USE WITH DIRECT CONNECTION TO A PUBLIC UTILITY GRID IS A

SIMILAR AND COMPATIBLE USE WITH OTHER SIMILARLY PRINCIPALLY PERMITTED USES LISTED IN THE M-2, HEAVY MANUFACTURING, ZONE; AND ADOPT A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA SECTION 15061(B)(3) (COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION) (PLANNING)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Open the public hearing, receive public testimony from anyone in the audience or on Zoom wishing to speak; and
2) Consider the information presented in the written and oral staff reports, in combination with the November 13, 2023 Planning Commission staff report and summary, which collectively provides the necessary background and context; and 3) Deny the appeal by Bridgeland Resources LLC; and
4) Find and determine that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) and;
January 11, 2024: Special City Council Meeting Page 5 of 7 5) Adopt City Council Resolution No. 9892, which incorporates the City Council’s findings and actions regarding the matter, which include to ratify the Planning Commission’s decision and to approve Zone Determination Case No. 2023-01 determining that a battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid is similar to and compatible with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone and will not be inconsistent with the purpose of the M-2 Zone; and
6) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

OLD BUSINESS

7. APPOINTMENTS TO CITY COMMISSIONS/COMMITTEES AND EXTERNAL

ORGANIZATIONS (CITY CLERK)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Review and make appointments to City commissions and committees as desired; and
2) Review and make appointments to City Council liaisons to advisory committees as desired; and
3) Review and make appointments to City Council subcommittees as desired; and 4) Review and make appointments to external organizations as desired; and 5) Take such additional, related action that might be desirable.

REGULAR BUSINESS

8. AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE COOPERATIVE AND FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH

METRO FOR THE ROSECRANS/MARQUARDT GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT (PUBLIC WORKS)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 2 to the Cooperative and Funding Agreement for the Rosecrans/Marquardt Grade Separation Project between the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the City of Santa Fe Springs; and
2) Approve a Professional Services Agreement with RailPros, Inc. to provide rail road flagging services for the Rosecrans Marquardt Grade Separation Project; and 3) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

January 11, 2024: Special City Council Meeting Page 6 of 7

CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine. Any items a Councilmember wishes to discuss should be designated at this time. All other items may be approved in a single motion. Such approval will also waive the reading of any Ordinance.

SUCCESSOR AGENCY

9. ADOPT RESOLUTION SA-2024-001 APPROVING THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY’S RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE (ROPS 24-25) AND ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2024 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2025 (FINANCE)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Successor Agency:
1) Adopt Resolution SA-2024-001 Approving the Successor Agency’s Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 24-25) and Administrative Budget for the Period July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025.

CITY COUNCIL

10. LISTING AGREEMENT TO APPOINT COLLIER INTERNATIONAL GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC., THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE THE RENEWAL OF A GROUND LEASE WITH THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE AT 11760

TELEGRAPH ROAD (PLANNING)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Approve the Listing Agreement appointing Colliers International Greater Los Angeles, Inc. (“Colliers”) as the City’s sole agent and granting to Colliers the exclusive right to negotiate the renewal of a ground lease with the United States Postal Services (USPS) for the real property located at 11760 Telegraph Road; and
2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Listing Agreement; and 3) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

11. TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY

PATROL SANTA FE SPRINGS AREA (CHP) (POLICE SERVICES)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Authorize the Director of Police Services to enter into an agreement with the California Highway Patrol Santa Fe Springs Area (CHP) for traffic enforcement in an amount not to exceed $50,000 on a recurring fiscal year basis.

January 11, 2024: Special City Council Meeting Page 7 of 7

12. REVISION TO PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL, SECTION 6-3.7 HOURLY NON-BENEFITTED SICK LEAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE HEALTHY WORKPLACE/HEALTHY FAMILIES ACT OF 2014 (PAID SICK LEAVE) (HUMAN RESOURCES)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Approve the revision to Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual (PPPM), Section 6-3.7 Hourly Non-Benefitted Sick Leave to comply with the Healthy Workplace/Healthy Families Act of 2014 (Paid Sick Leave).

13. CLARKE ESTATE PARKING LOT PAVING IMPROVEMENTS – AWARD OF

CONTRACT (PUBLIC WORKS)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Accept the bids; and
2) Award a contract to Prestige Paving Company, Inc. of La Mirada, California in the amount of $129,197.81; and
3) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

14. CALRECYCLE GRANT AND PAYMENT PROGRAMS (CITY MANAGER) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Adopt a resolution authorizing the submittal of application(s) for all CalRecycle Grant and Payment Programs for which the City is eligible.

COUNCIL COMMENTS/AB1234 COUNCIL CONFERENCE REPORTING
Council member announcements; requests for future agenda items; conference/meetings reports. Members of the City Council will provide a brief report on meetings attended at the expense of the local agency as required by Government Code Section 53232.3(d).

ADJOURNMENT
I, Fernando N. Muñoz, Deputy City Clerk for the City of Santa Fe Springs hereby certify that a copy of this agenda has been posted no less than 24 hours at the following locations; City’s website at www.santafesprings.org; Santa Fe Springs City Hall, 11710 Telegraph Road; Santa Fe Springs City Library, 11700 Telegraph Road; and the Town Center Plaza (Kiosk), 11740 Telegraph Road.
_____________________________________________
Fernando N. Muñoz, CMC, Deputy City Clerk

CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS

SPECIAL MEETINGS OF THE HOUSING SUCCESSOR,

SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
THURSDAY, JANUARY 11, 2024
AT 6:00 P.M.

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11710 TELEGRAPH ROAD
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670

CITY COUNCIL
Jay Sarno, Mayor
William K. Rounds, Mayor Pro Tem
Juanita Martin, Councilmember
Annette Rodriguez, Councilmember
Joe Angel Zamora, Councilmember

CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY
René Bobadilla, P.E. Ivy M. Tsai

CITY STAFF
Assistant City Manager Nicholas Razo
Fire Chief Chad Van Meeteren
Police Chief Aviv Bar
Director of Community Services Maricela Balderas
Director of Finance Lana Dich
Director of Planning Wayne Morrell
Director of Police Services Dino Torres
Director of Public Works James Enriquez
City Clerk Janet Martinez
January 11, 2024: Special City Council Meeting Page 2 of 7

NOTICES
This City Council Meeting (“Council”) will be held in person and will meet at City Hall – City Council Chambers, 11710 E. Telegraph Road, Santa Fe Springs, California. The meeting will be live streamed on the City’s YouTube Channel and can be accessed on the City’s website via the following link:
https://santafesprings.org/city_council/city_council_meetings/index.php Americans with Disabilities Act: In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Clerk’s Office. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

SB 1439: Effective January 1, 2023, City Council Members are subject to SB 1439 and cannot participate in certain decisions for a year after accepting campaign contributions of more than $250 from an interested person. The Council Member would need to disclose the donation and abstain from voting.

Public Comments: The public is encouraged to address City Council on any matter listed on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the City Council on the day of the meeting, please fill out a speaker card provided at the door and submit it to City Clerk staff. You may also submit comments in writing by sending them to the City Clerk's Office at [email protected]. All written comments received by 12:00 p.m. the day of the City Council Meeting will be distributed to the City Council and made a part of the official record of the meeting. Written comments will not be read at the meeting, only the name of the person submitting the comment will be announced. Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future City Council meeting.

Please Note: Staff reports and supplemental attachments are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk in City Hall, during regular business hours 7:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m., Monday – Thursday. Telephone: (562) 868-0511.

January 11, 2024: Special City Council Meeting Page 3 of 7

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

INVOCATION

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

INTRODUCTIONS

PRESENTATIONS

1. 2023 HOLIDAY HOME DECORATING CONTEST WINNERS (COMMUNITY

SERVICES)

2. TREE LIGHTING & SANTA FLOAT PROGRAMS RECAP (COMMUNITY

SERVICES)

3. HOLIDAY BASKET PROGRAMS RECAP (COMMUNITY SERVICES)

4. 2023 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT END OF YEAR RECAP OF

EVENTS (COMMUNITY SERVICES)

CHANGES TO AGENDA

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA AND AGENDA ITEMS
At this time, the general public may address the City Council on both non-agenda and agenda items. Please be aware that the maximum time allotted for members of the public to speak shall not exceed three (3) minutes per speaker. State Law prohibits the City Council from taking action or entertaining extended discussion on a topic not listed on the agenda.

Please show courtesy to others and direct all of your comments to the Mayor.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS ON ITEMS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENDA – NONE

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

PUBLIC HEARING

5. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED ZONE TEXT AMENDMENTS TO ENSURE THAT THE CITY’S ZONING ORDINANCE IS ALIGNED WITH THE STATE’S ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNIT (JADU) STATUTES AND FIND THAT THE AMENDMENTS ARE

EXEMPT FROM CEQA (PLANNING)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:

January 11, 2024: Special City Council Meeting Page 4 of 7 1) Open the Public Hearing and receive the written and oral staff report and any comments from the public regarding the proposed zone text amendments related to ADU and JADU regulations; and
2) Find and determine that the proposed zone text amendments are consistent with the goals, policies, and program of the City’s General Plan; and 3) Find and determine that the proposed zone text amendments are consistent with the State’s ADU and JADU regulations; and
4) Find and determine that this Project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 21080.17 which provides an exemption for the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (the state ADU law); and
5) Waive further reading and introduce Ordinance No. 1134 by title, adopting Zone Text Amendments to ensure that the City’s Zoning Ordinance is aligned with the State’s Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU) statutes; and
6) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

6. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DECISION TO APPROVE ZONE DETERMINATION CASE NO. 2023-01: A REQUEST TO DETERMINE THAT A BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE

SYSTEM USE WITH DIRECT CONNECTION TO A PUBLIC UTILITY GRID IS A

SIMILAR AND COMPATIBLE USE WITH OTHER SIMILARLY PRINCIPALLY PERMITTED USES LISTED IN THE M-2, HEAVY MANUFACTURING, ZONE; AND ADOPT A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA SECTION 15061(B)(3) (COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION) (PLANNING)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Open the public hearing, receive public testimony from anyone in the audience or on Zoom wishing to speak; and
2) Consider the information presented in the written and oral staff reports, in combination with the November 13, 2023 Planning Commission staff report and summary, which collectively provides the necessary background and context; and 3) Deny the appeal by Bridgeland Resources LLC; and
4) Find and determine that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) and;
January 11, 2024: Special City Council Meeting Page 5 of 7 5) Adopt City Council Resolution No. 9892, which incorporates the City Council’s findings and actions regarding the matter, which include to ratify the Planning Commission’s decision and to approve Zone Determination Case No. 2023-01 determining that a battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid is similar to and compatible with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone and will not be inconsistent with the purpose of the M-2 Zone; and
6) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

OLD BUSINESS

7. APPOINTMENTS TO CITY COMMISSIONS/COMMITTEES AND EXTERNAL

ORGANIZATIONS (CITY CLERK)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Review and make appointments to City commissions and committees as desired; and
2) Review and make appointments to City Council liaisons to advisory committees as desired; and
3) Review and make appointments to City Council subcommittees as desired; and 4) Review and make appointments to external organizations as desired; and 5) Take such additional, related action that might be desirable.

REGULAR BUSINESS

8. AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE COOPERATIVE AND FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH

METRO FOR THE ROSECRANS/MARQUARDT GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT (PUBLIC WORKS)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 2 to the Cooperative and Funding Agreement for the Rosecrans/Marquardt Grade Separation Project between the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the City of Santa Fe Springs; and
2) Approve a Professional Services Agreement with RailPros, Inc. to provide rail road flagging services for the Rosecrans Marquardt Grade Separation Project; and 3) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

January 11, 2024: Special City Council Meeting Page 6 of 7

CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine. Any items a Councilmember wishes to discuss should be designated at this time. All other items may be approved in a single motion. Such approval will also waive the reading of any Ordinance.

SUCCESSOR AGENCY

9. ADOPT RESOLUTION SA-2024-001 APPROVING THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY’S RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE (ROPS 24-25) AND ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2024 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2025 (FINANCE)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Successor Agency:
1) Adopt Resolution SA-2024-001 Approving the Successor Agency’s Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 24-25) and Administrative Budget for the Period July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025.

CITY COUNCIL

10. LISTING AGREEMENT TO APPOINT COLLIER INTERNATIONAL GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC., THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE THE RENEWAL OF A GROUND LEASE WITH THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE AT 11760

TELEGRAPH ROAD (PLANNING)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Approve the Listing Agreement appointing Colliers International Greater Los Angeles, Inc. (“Colliers”) as the City’s sole agent and granting to Colliers the exclusive right to negotiate the renewal of a ground lease with the United States Postal Services (USPS) for the real property located at 11760 Telegraph Road; and
2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Listing Agreement; and 3) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

11. TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY

PATROL SANTA FE SPRINGS AREA (CHP) (POLICE SERVICES)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Authorize the Director of Police Services to enter into an agreement with the California Highway Patrol Santa Fe Springs Area (CHP) for traffic enforcement in an amount not to exceed $50,000 on a recurring fiscal year basis.

January 11, 2024: Special City Council Meeting Page 7 of 7

12. REVISION TO PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL, SECTION 6-3.7 HOURLY NON-BENEFITTED SICK LEAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE HEALTHY WORKPLACE/HEALTHY FAMILIES ACT OF 2014 (PAID SICK LEAVE) (HUMAN RESOURCES)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Approve the revision to Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual (PPPM), Section 6-3.7 Hourly Non-Benefitted Sick Leave to comply with the Healthy Workplace/Healthy Families Act of 2014 (Paid Sick Leave).

13. CLARKE ESTATE PARKING LOT PAVING IMPROVEMENTS – AWARD OF

CONTRACT (PUBLIC WORKS)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Accept the bids; and
2) Award a contract to Prestige Paving Company, Inc. of La Mirada, California in the amount of $129,197.81; and
3) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

14. CALRECYCLE GRANT AND PAYMENT PROGRAMS (CITY MANAGER) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Adopt a resolution authorizing the submittal of application(s) for all CalRecycle Grant and Payment Programs for which the City is eligible.

COUNCIL COMMENTS/AB1234 COUNCIL CONFERENCE REPORTING
Council member announcements; requests for future agenda items; conference/meetings reports. Members of the City Council will provide a brief report on meetings attended at the expense of the local agency as required by Government Code Section 53232.3(d).

ADJOURNMENT
I, Fernando N. Muñoz, Deputy City Clerk for the City of Santa Fe Springs hereby certify that a copy of this agenda has been posted no less than 24 hours at the following locations; City’s website at www.santafesprings.org; Santa Fe Springs City Hall, 11710 Telegraph Road; Santa Fe Springs City Library, 11700 Telegraph Road; and the Town Center Plaza (Kiosk), 11740 Telegraph Road.
_____________________________________________
Fernando N. Muñoz, CMC, Deputy City Clerk
ITEM # 5

CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: René Bobadilla, P.E., City Manager
BY: Wayne Morrell, Director of Planning and Development SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED ZONE TEXT AMENDMENTS TO ENSURE THAT THE CITY’S ZONING ORDINANCE
IS ALIGNED WITH THE STATE’S ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU)

AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (JADU) STATUTES AND

FIND THAT THE AMENDMENTS ARE EXEMPT FROM CEQA
DATE: January 11, 2024
RECOMMENDATION(S):

It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Open the Public Hearing and receive the written and oral staff report and any comments from the public regarding the proposed zone text amendments related to ADU and JADU regulations; and
2) Find and determine that the proposed zone text amendments are consistent with the goals, policies, and program of the City’s General Plan; and 3) Find and determine that the proposed zone text amendments are consistent with the State’s ADU and JADU regulations; and
4) Find and determine that this Project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 21080.17 which provides an exemption for the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (the state ADU law); and
5) Waive further reading and introduce Ordinance No. 1134 by title, adopting Zone Text Amendments to ensure that the City’s Zoning Ordinance is aligned with the State’s Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU) statutes; and
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2024

Page 2 of 4 ends

6) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the proposed Ordinance No. 1134, which implement zoning text amendments to the City’s Zoning Ordinance is not expected to have any immediate fiscal impact.

PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AND RECOMMENDATION
On November 13, 2023, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to review and consider the proposed Zone Text Amendment (ZTA). The purpose of the amendment was to align the City’s Zoning Ordinance with the State’s Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU) statutes. Following a thorough evaluation of written and oral reports, input from the Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) ADU consultant, and public discussions during the Planning Commission meeting on November 13, 2023, the Commissioners voted 4-1, with Commissioner Flores voting ‘nay’, to approve and adopt Resolution No. 252-2023.

This resolution recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Ordinance No. 1134 to effectuate the proposed amendments to the text of the City’s Zoning Ordinance; and determined that the proposed ZTA is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 21080.17. (See Attachment E)

BACKGROUND
On March 9, 2017, in response to changes in the State's ADU and JADU regulations, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1084, which updated the City's Zoning Ordinance to comply with the State's regulations at that time.

Since the adoption of Ordinance No. 1084 in March of 2017, a new set of State ADU laws (SB-897, AB-2221, and AB-916) took effect on January 1, 2023, as well as AB 1033 which took effect on January 1, 2024, which invalidated certain provisions of the City's Zoning Ordinance related to ADUs and JADUs.

In 2021, the City of Santa Fe Springs the City was selected to participate in Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) Regional Early Action Program (REAP) for Advanced ADU Implementation. City staff collaborated closely with SCAG consultant, Woodsong Associates, and the City Attorney’s Office to develop a proposed ZTA that aligns the City's Zoning Ordinance regulations for ADUs and JADUs with recent State Laws. This update will amend the City's Zoning Ordinance regulations for both ADUs and JADUs.

ANALYSIS
According to California Government Code Section 65852.2, local ordinances failing to meet the requirements of State ADU/JADU Laws may be deemed null and void in their CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2024

Page 3 of 4 ends

entirety. Subsequently, the local jurisdiction will be limited to applying only State Law standards without local refinements to all local ADU and JADU development projects.

The proposed ZTA will establish updated City procedures and development standards for ADUs and JADUs that align with recent State Laws. This serves to protect the City from legal challenges to the validity of its ADU ordinance while maintaining local control in regulating these projects. For a detailed analysis, please refer to the November 13, 2023, Planning Commission staff report’s analysis section (see Attachment B).

ENVIRONMENTAL
Pursuant to California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21080.17, adoption of the Zone Text Amendment and Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Under PRC Section 21080.17, CEQA does not apply to the adoption of an Ordinance by a city or county to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (State ADU law). The ZTA implements California Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 within the City of Santa Fe Springs in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of State ADU/JADU Laws. As such, the proposed ZTA and Ordinance is exempt from CEQA.

DISCUSSION
As mentioned previously, the City was selected to participate in SCAG REAP for Advanced ADU Implementation. City staff collaborated closely with SCAG consultant, Woodsong Associates, and the City Attorney’s Office to develop a proposed Zone Text Amendment aligning the City's Zoning Ordinance regulations for ADUs and JADUs with recent State Laws. This update will enhance the City's Zoning Ordinance regulations for both ADUs and JADUs.

In addition to the essential updates mandated by State Laws, Woodsong Associates proposed further amendments to the City’s Zoning Ordinance to promote the production of ADUs and JADUs. After careful review, City staff determined that certain amendments proposed by Woodsong Associates did not align with the goals and policies of the residential land-use designations in Santa Fe Springs. Consequently, these changes were not included in the final draft Zone Text Amendment recommended by staff and the Planning Commission. Detailed descriptions of the proposed ZTA can be found in the November 13, 2023, Planning Commission staff report (see Attachment D).

LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Legal notice was posted at Santa Fe Springs City Hall, the City’s Town Center Kiosk, the City’s Library, and also published in a newspaper of general circulation (Whittier Daily News) on December 21, 2023, as required by the State Zoning and Development Laws.

As of the date of this report, staff has not received any further inquiry regarding the proposed project.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2024

Page 4 of 4 ends

SUMMARY
Staff and the Planning Commission are therefore recommending that the City Council approve and adopt Ordinance No. 1134 to effectuate the proposed amendments to the text of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and determined that the proposed ZTA is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 21080.17.

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Public Hearing Notice
B. November 13, 2023 Planning Commission Staff Report
C. Planning Commission Resolution No. 252-2023
D. Ordinance No. 1134
a. Exhibit A – Definitions Text Amendment
b. Exhibit B – Accessory Dwelling Unit Text Amendment
Attachment A: Public Hearing Notice
PUB HEARING - INTRODUCE ORD NO. 1134 - Page 1 of 1
181 W. Huntington Drive Suite#209
Monrovia, California 91016
(626) 544-0885
[email protected]
City of Santa Fe Springs
Attn: Linda Guerrero
Santa Fe Springs, California 90670
Account Number: 5007848
Ad Order Number: 0011638176
Customer's Reference/PO Number:

Publication: Whittier Daily News
Publication Dates: 12/21/2023
Total Amount: $612.96
Payment Amount: $0.00
Amount Due: $612.96
Notice ID: dRbpaGU3AWQr0A5kj6YO
Invoice Text: CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT TO ENSURE THAT THE CITY’S ZONING ORDINANCE IS ALIGNED WITH THE STATE’S ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) AND JUNIOR

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (JADU) REGULATIONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Santa Fe Springs will hold a Public Hearing to consider the following: PROJECT: The City of Santa Fe Springs is proposing a Zone Text Amendment (ZTA) related to Section 155.003 (Definitions), Section 155.644 (Accessory Dwelling Unit), and Section 155.644.1 (Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit) of the City's Zoning Ordinance to align it with the State's ADU and JADU Regulations. CEQA STATUS: Pursuant to California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21080.17, adoption of the subject ZTA and Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Under PRC Section 21080.17, CEQA does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (State ADU law). The ZTA implements California Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 within the City of Santa Fe Springs in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of State ADU/JADU Laws. As such, the proposed ZTA and Ordinance is exempt from CEQA. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMENDATION: After receiving the written and oral reports, input from the Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) ADU consultant, and public discussions during the Planning Commission meeting on November 13, 2023, the Commissioners voted 4-1, with Commissioner Flores voting ‘nay’, to approve and adopt Resolution No. 252-2023.

PUB HEARING - INTRODUCE ORD NO. 1134 - Page 1 of 1
Whittier Daily News
181 W. Huntington Drive Suite#209
Monrovia, California 91016
(626) 544-0885
FILE NO. 0011638176

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Los Angeles County
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years,
and not party to or interested in the above-entitled
matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of
WHITTIER DAILY NEWS, a newspaper of general
circulation for the City of Whittier, by the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles County, State of California, on the date of October 10, 1960, Case Number 369393.

The notice, of which the annexed is a true printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of
said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to wit:
12/21/2023
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed at Monrovia, California
On this 21st day of December, 2023.
______________________________
Signature

CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT TO ENSURE THAT THE CITY’S ZONING ORDINANCE IS ALIGNED WITH THE STATE’S ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) AND JUNIOR

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (JADU) REGULATIONS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Santa Fe Springs will hold a Public Hearing to consider the following:

PROJECT: The City of Santa Fe Springs is proposing a Zone Text Amendment (ZTA) related to Section 155.003 (Definitions), Section 155.644 (Accessory Dwelling Unit), and Section 155.644.1 (Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit) of the City's Zoning Ordinance to align it with the State's ADU and JADU Regulations.

CEQA STATUS: Pursuant to California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21080.17, adoption of the subject ZTA and Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Under PRC Section 21080.17, CEQA does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (State ADU law). The ZTA implements California Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 within the City of Santa Fe Springs in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of State ADU/JADU Laws. As such, the proposed ZTA and Ordinance is exempt from CEQA.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMENDATION: After receiving the written and oral reports, input from the Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) ADU consultant, and public discussions during the Planning Commission meeting on November 13, 2023, the Commissioners voted 4-1, with Commissioner Flores voting ‘nay’, to approve and adopt Resolution No. 252-2023. This resolution recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Ordinance No. 1134 to effectuate the proposed amendments to the text of the City’s Zoning Ordinance; and determined that the proposed ZTA is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 21080.17.

PROJECT LOCATION: All parcels zoned residential or mixed-use within the City of Santa Fe Springs’ city boundaries.

THE HEARING will be held before the City Council of the City of Santa Fe Springs in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 11710 Telegraph Road, Santa Fe Springs, on Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 6:00 p.m.

ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to participate in the Public Hearing and express their opinion on the item listed above. Please note that if you challenge the aforementioned item in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk’s office, or prior to the Public Hearing.

PUBLIC COMMENTS may be submitted in writing to the City Clerk at [email protected]. Please submit your written comments by 12:00 p.m. on the day of the City Council meeting. You may also contact the City Clerk at: (562) 868- 0511.

FURTHER INFORMATION on this item may be obtained from Jimmy Wong, Associate Planner, via e-mail at: [email protected] or otherwise by phone at: (562) 868-0511 ext. 7451.

Attachment B: November 13, 2023 Planning Commission Staff Report ITEM #____

CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STAFF REPORT
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Wayne M. Morrell, Director of Planning
BY: Jimmy Wong, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED ZONE TEXT AMENDMENTS TO ENSURE THAT THE CITY’S ZONING ORDINANCE
IS ALIGNED WITH THE STATE’S ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (JADU) STATUTES.

DATE: November 13, 2023
RECOMMENDATION(S):

It is recommended that the Planning Commission:
1) Open the Public Hearing and receive the written and oral staff report and any comments from the public regarding the proposed zone text amendments related to ADU and JADU regulations; and
2) Find and determine that the proposed zone text amendments are consistent with the goals, policies, and program of the City’s General Plan; and 3) Find and determine that the proposed zone text amendments are consistent with the State’s ADU and JADU regulations; and
4) Find and determine that this Project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 21080.17 which provides an exemption for the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (the state ADU law); and
5) Adopt Resolution No. 252-2023, which incorporates the Planning Commission’s findings and actions regarding this matter; and
6) Recommend that the City Council approve and adopt Ordinance No. 1134 to effectuate the proposed amendments to the text of the City’s Zoning Ordinance; 3 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT– MEETING OF November 13, 2023

Page 2 of 10 ends

and
7) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the proposed Ordinance No. 1134 ,which implement zoning text amendments to the City’s Zoning Ordinance is not expected to have any immediate fiscal impact.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Background
On March 9, 2017, in response to changes in the State's ADU and JADU regulations, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1084, which updated the City's Zoning Ordinance to comply with the State's regulations at that time.

In 2021, the City of Santa Fe Springs applied for and was selected by the Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) and the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (CA HCD) to participate in the SCAG 2020/2021 Sustainable Communities Program (SCP) as part of the Regional Early Action Program (REAP). The SCP is a multi-year program designed to support and implement the policies and initiatives of Connect SoCal, the 2020 Regional Transportation Plan, and the Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and continues the themes of the previous round of funded projects.

The project type that the City had applied for was Advance Accessory Dwelling Unit Implementation. Its goal is to provide planning assistance to develop effective ADU implementation policies and programs, accelerating housing production and serving as best practices for other cities in the region. One of the project's primary deliverables is the update of the City's ADU and JADU ordinance to align with State laws and promote ADU and JADU productivity within the City.

Since the adoption of Ordinance No. 1084 in March of 2017, a new set of State ADU laws (SB-897, AB-2221, and AB-916) took effect on January 1, 2023, which invalidated certain provisions of the City's Zoning Ordinance related to ADUs and JADUs. (Attachment B) According to California Government Code Section 65852.2, local ordinances failing to meet the requirements of State ADU/JADU Laws may be deemed null and void in their entirety. Subsequently, the local jurisdiction will be limited to applying only State Law standards without local refinements to all local ADU and JADU development projects. The proposed Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) will establish updated City procedures and development standards for ADUs and JADUs that align with recent State Laws.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT– MEETING OF November 13, 2023

Page 3 of 10 ends

ANALYSIS
As previously mentioned, the City was selected to participate in SCAG REAP for Advanced ADU Implementation. City staff collaborated closely with SCAG consultant, Woodsong Associates, and the City Attorney’s Office to develop a proposed Zone Text Amendment that aligns the City's Zoning Ordinance regulations for ADUs and JADUs with recent State Laws. This update will update the City's Zoning Ordinance regulations for both ADUs and JADUs.

In addition to the essential updates mandated by State Laws, Woodsong Associates proposed further amendments to the City’s Zoning Ordinance, aimed at promoting the production of ADUs and JADUs. After careful review, City staff decided that certain amendments proposed by Woodsong Associates did not align with the goals and policies of the residential land-use designations in Santa Fe Springs. Consequently, these changes were not included in the final draft Zone Text Amendment (Attachment D) recommended by staff.

ZTA A (Attachment C) is proposed by the Woodsong Associates, and ZTA B (Attachment D) is proposed by staff. It should be noted that both proposed ZTAs align with State Law and have been reviewed by the City's attorney.

The table below provides a summary of both versions.

Category ZTA A (Woodsong Associates) ZTA B (Staff)
Section
155.003
(Definition)
Updated term related to Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) under Section
155.003 (Definition).

Here's the list of updated terms:

Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
Accessory Dwelling Unit, Junior (JADU)
Living Area
Staff recommends accepting all the
updates suggested by the consultant.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT– MEETING OF November 13, 2023

Page 4 of 10 ends

Category ZTA A (Woodsong Associates) ZTA B (Staff)
Section
155.003
(Definition)
Added several new terms associated
with ADUs to Section 155.003
(Definition). These terms will enhance
our understanding and communication
regarding ADU-related topics.

Here's the list of new terms:

Carriage House
Efficiency Kitchen
Impact Fee
Nonconforming Zoning Condition
Objective Standards
Permit Fees
Permitting Agency
Proposed Dwelling
Public Transit
Tandem Parking, Residential
Staff recommends accepting all of the new
terms.

Staff recommends editing the terms
'Permit Fee' and 'Impact Fee' to apply to
both homeowners and developers, rather
than exclusively to ADU projects.

Section
155.644.

Accessory
Dwelling Units
Updated the "Intent" subsection under
Section 155.644 to align more closely
with State ADUs and JADUs Law.

Staff recommends accepting all the
consultant's revisions. Additionally, the
'Applications' subsection has been updated
to align more closely with State Law.

Section
155.644 (D).

Accessory
Dwelling Unit
Standards
Updated the "Allowable zones"
subsection under Section 155.644 to
include single family residential,
multifamily residential and mixed use
zone
Staff recommends accepting all updates
suggested by the consultant
Updated the "Number of ADUs"
subsection under Section 155.644 to be
consistent with the State Law.

Furthermore, the consultant is
recommending allowing two ADUs per
parcel zoned for single-family residential
use instead of the State minimum of one
ADU per parcel.

Staff recommends accepting all other
revision suggested by the consultant
beside the number of ADU per parcel.

Staff recommends allowing only one ADU
and one JADU per parcel. This decision is
in response to the ongoing parking issues
raised by residents. Allowing an additional
ADU could exacerbate the existing parking
problem in the City. Furthermore, with the
passage of SB9, residents will have the
ability to construct one additional unit on
top of the allowable ADU and JADU.

Updated the "Allowable forms"
subsection under Section 155.644 to be
consistent with the State Law.

Staff recommends accepting all the
updates suggested by the consultant.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT– MEETING OF November 13, 2023

Page 5 of 10 ends

Category ZTA A (Woodsong Associates) ZTA B (Staff)
Section
155.644 (D).

Accessory
Dwelling Unit
Standards
Updated the "Floor area standards"
subsection under Section 155.644 by
increasing the allowable square footage
of an accessory dwelling unit with more
than one bedroom from 1,000 sf to 1,200
sf. Additionally, consultant suggest
eliminated the floor area restriction on
attached accessory dwelling units.

Staff recommends accepting all the
updates suggested by the consultant.

Section
155.644.1
Junior
Accessory
Dwelling Unit
Updated the "Setback standards"
subsection under Section 155.644 by:

1. Allowing accessory dwelling unit under
16' in height to have zero side and rear
setback.

2. Allow for carriage houses in the front
setback area

3. Accessory dwelling units can be
constructed within the front setback,
provided they are set back at least four
feet from the sidewalk line.

Staff recommends rejecting all proposed
updates from the consultant. Instead, we
recommend updating the setback
standards to meet the minimum
requirements of State Law:

1. Retain the applicable front setback
standard for the specific zone unless it
would prohibit the construction of at least
an 850 square foot accessory dwelling
unit.

2. Maintain the 4-foot setback from the
side and rear property lines.

3. Keep the existing setback requirement
for the conversion of an existing accessory
structure into an accessory dwelling
unit.Staff believes that encroaching into
the front yard should only be considered
as a last resort for constructing an
accessory dwelling unit. Additionally,
having no setback requirements for the
rear and sides could pose building health
and safety concerns to the neighboring
property.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT– MEETING OF November 13, 2023

Page 6 of 10 ends

Category ZTA A (Woodsong Associates) ZTA B (Staff)
Section
155.644.1
Junior
Accessory
Dwelling Unit
Updated the 'Height standards'
subsection under Section 155.644 as
follows:

1. Detached accessory dwelling units
can have a maximum height of 25 feet.

2. Attached accessory dwelling units
must not exceed the maximum allowable
height of the base zone.

Staff recommend rejecting all proposed
updates from the consultant. Instead, we
recommend updating the setback
standards to meet the minimum
requirements of State Law:

1. Retain the maximum 16 feet height for
detach accessory dwelling unit.

2. As required by State law, staff
recommends allowing detached accessory
dwelling units on a lot within one-half mile
walking distance of a major transit stop or
high-quality transit corridor, as defined in
Public Resources Code Section 21155,
are allowed a maximum height of 18 feet.

An additional two feet in height is permitted
to align with the roof pitch of the primary
dwelling unit.

3. As required by State law, staff
recommends allowing for an accessory
dwelling unit that is attached to a primary
dwelling to not exceed 25 feet in height or
the height of the primary dwelling,
whichever is lower.

Staff is concerned that allowing two-story
ADUs may result in privacy issues for
neighboring properties, particularly in light
of the minimum setback requirement of 4
feet from both side and rear property lines.

Consequently, staff recommends updating
the height standard to align with the State
law's minimum requirement.

Remove the 'Location' subsection under
Section 155.644.

Staff recommends retaining the 'Location'
subsection to clearly identify the preferred
location of the proposed ADU.

Updated the 'Manufacturing ADU'
subsection under Section 155.644 to
include factory-built ADUS, and modular
ADUs, as required by State laws.

Staff recommends accepted all updates
suggested by the consultant
Remove the 'Parking' subsection under
Section 155.644.

Staff recommends retaining the 'Parking'
subsection. This decision is in response to
the ongoing parking issues raised by
residents. By removing this section, no
parking will be required for any type of
ADU or JADU development.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT– MEETING OF November 13, 2023

Page 7 of 10 ends

Category ZTA A (Woodsong Associates) ZTA B (Staff)
Section
155.644.1
Junior
Accessory
Dwelling Unit
Combine and update the 'Replacement
parking' subsection with 'Parking'
subsection under Section 155.644 as
follows:

1. Remove the parking requirement for
ADUs and JADUs.

2. Eliminate the need for replacement
parking, irrespective of the parcel's
distance from a transit stop.

Staff recommends keeping the
'Replacement parking' subsection in
response to the parking issues raised by
residents. Without this section, no parking
would be required for any ADU or JADU
development, even when existing parking
is removed.

Updated the 'Owner occupancy'
subsection under Section 155.644 to not
require owner occupancy for any of the
unit in the parcel.

Staff recommends accepting all the
updates suggested by the consultant.

Updated the 'Rentals and separate sale
of ADUs' subsection under Section
155.644 to align with State Laws. This
update permits the sale of ADUs under
specific provisions and requirements.

Furthermore, the consultant
recommends allowing ADUs to be sold
or conveyed separately from the primary
home as condominiums, subject to the
following requirements listed Section
155.644 (D)(12)(b), irrespective of
income level.

Staff recommends accepting only the
updates mandated by State Laws and
rejecting updates that allow ADUs to be
sold separately, irrespective of income
level.

With the passage of SB9, residents
already have the ability to sell a second
dwelling through an urban lot split
irrespective of income level. Additionally,
the new condominium provision in state
law applies only if a city adopts an
ordinance allowing for it. Therefore, the
City is not required to adopt this provision.

Staff recommends updating the language
in the 'Utility connection or capacity
charges' subsection in accordance with the
City's attorney recommendations to be
consistent with State Laws.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT– MEETING OF November 13, 2023

Page 8 of 10 ends

Category ZTA A (Woodsong Associates) ZTA B (Staff)
Updated the 'Impact fee' subsection
under Section 155.644 to be consistent
with State law.

Staff recommends accepting all the
updates suggested by the consultant.

Removed the 'Deed restriction'
subsection and requirement under
Section 155.644.

Staff recommends accepting all the
updates suggested by the consultant.

Updated the 'Design standard'
subsection under Section 155.644 to
align with State law on objective design
standards.

Staff recommends accepting all the
updates suggested by the consultant.

Updated the 'Mandatory application
approvals' subsection under Section
155.644 to 'ADU application approvals'.

Updated the language to align the
language with State law regarding
application approval.

Staff recommends accepting most of the
updates proposed by the consultant.

However, we advise against adopting
subsection (2) at this time because the
City is still in the process of creating the
pre-approved ADU plans, and this
subsection is not required to be adopted
until 2025
Updated the 'Existing unit' subsection
under Section 155.644 to align with State
law on existing ADUs constructed prior to
2018.

Staff recommends accepting all the
updates suggested by the consultant.

Staff recommends updating the language
under the 'Intent' and 'Administrative
review' subsections, as recommended by
the City's attorney.

Section
155.644.1 (C)
Junior
Accessory
Dwelling Unit
Standards
Updated the 'Number allowed'
subsection to allow for two ADUs and
one JADU per residential parcel.

Staff recommends allowing only one ADU
and one JADU per parcel. As mentioned
previously, this decision is in response to
the ongoing parking issues raised by
residents. Allowing an additional ADU
could exacerbate the existing parking
problem in the City. Furthermore, with the
passage of SB9, residents will have the
ability to construct one additional unit on
top of the allowable ADU and JADU.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT– MEETING OF November 13, 2023

Page 9 of 10 ends

Category ZTA A (Woodsong Associates) ZTA B (Staff)
Section
155.644.1 (C)
Junior
Accessory
Dwelling Unit
Standards
Staff recommends updating the language
in the 'Allowable location' subsections to
clarify that residents can convert their
attached garage into a JADU.

Updated the 'Kitchen required'
subsection to provide a clearer definition
of what constitutes a kitchen within a
JADU.

Staff recommends accepting all the
updates suggested by the consultant.

Staff recommends updating the language
under the 'Enforcement' subsections, as
recommended by the City's attorney.

ENVIRONMENTAL
Pursuant to California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21080.17, adoption of the Zone Text Amendment and Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Under PRC Section 21080.17, CEQA does not apply to the adoption of an Ordinance by a city or county to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (State ADU law). The ZTA implements California Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 within the City of Santa Fe Springs in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of State ADU/JADU Laws. As such, the proposed ZTA and Ordinance is exempt from CEQA.

DISCUSSION
Authority of the Planning Commission
The Planning Commission hearing to consider the proposed Zone Text Amendment related to Section 155.003 (Definitions), Section 155.644 (Accessory Dwelling Unit), and Section 155.644.1 (Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit), are required by State Statute and provides an opportunity for the community and interested parties to provide their comments regarding the Project. Furthermore, because the Project is an amendment to the City’s Municipal Code, the Planning Commission’s recommendation regarding the proposed updates will be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration at a subsequent public hearing, tentatively scheduled for December 5, 2023.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT– MEETING OF November 13, 2023

Page 10 of 10 ends

SUMMARY
Reports Received
On August 31, 2023, the Planning Department staff submitted a draft Zone Text Amendment (ZTA) and the proposed ZTA by Woodsong Associates (Attachment C) to the City Attorney’s Office for review and comments. Staff has incorporated the City's Attorney's recommendations into the final proposed ZTA, as outlined in Attachment D.

Public Notification
This matter was set for Public Hearing in accordance with the requirements of Sections 65090 and 65091 of the State Planning, Zoning, and Development Laws and the requirements of Sections 155.860 through 155.864 of the City’s Municipal Code.

The legal notice was posted at Santa Fe Springs City Hall, the City’s Town Center Kiosk, the City’s Library, and also published in a newspaper of general circulation (Whittier Daily News) on November 2, 2023, as required by the State Zoning and Development Laws.

As of the date of this report, staff has not received any further inquiry regarding the proposed project.

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Attachment A – Public Hearing Notice
B. Attachment B – New ADU State Laws
C. Attachment C – ZTA A by Woodsong Associate
D. Attachment D – ZTA B by Staff
E. Attachment E – Resolution No. 252-2023
F. Attachment F – Draft Ordinance No. 1134

Please contact the Planning Department at (562) 868-0511, ext. 7550 or [email protected] for more information.

How tall of an ADU can be built under new State laws?
Attached ADUs that are affixed to the primary dwelling are allowed to be up to two stories with a height of up to 25 feet, or the height limit in the underlying zoning, whichever is lower. If there is an existing or proposed garage attached to the primary dwelling, this would allow for an ADU to be built above the attached garage.

Detached ADUs within ½ mile walking distance of transit are allowed up to 18 feet in height, plus an additional two feet in height allowance to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling.

Transit is defined as either a major transit stop or a HighQuality Transit Corridor (HQTC); however, currently, Santa Fe Springs is not served by any such qualifying transit service.

On a property with an existing or proposed multifamily, multi-story dwelling, an ADU height allowance is provided of 18 feet. This applies to all lots that allow multifamily residential uses, regardless of relative proximity to transit.

The existing height allowance of 16 feet is maintained for all ADUs not covered by one of the previous three exemption categories above. This height is generally considered
insufficient to allow for two-story ADUs.

What is the new ADU approval process, under State law? The new 2022 ADU bills clarify that within 60 days of receiving a completed application for an ADU, the local agency must approve or deny the permit application.

If the local agency denies the application, then it must, within the 60-day period, provide a full set of comments to the applicant with a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied by the applicant to be approved upon submittal. The 60-day clock is paused if the application is returned to the applicant with this set of comments. Once the applicant has submitted a corrected application, then the 60-day clock resumes.

If the local agency has not approved or denied the completed application within 60 days, then the application shall be deemed approved. This applies to all “Permitting Agencies” defined as “any entity that is involved in the review of a permit for an ADU”. Examples include, but are not limited to, the Planning Division, Building and Safety Division, Public Works Department, Los Angeles County Fire Department,
utilities, and special districts.

FAQS about new ADU Laws for 2023
On September 28, 2022, Governor Newsom signed new laws into effect impacting ADUs:

SB 897, AB 2221, and AB 916. Taking effect as of January 2023, these laws made changes to the statewide regulatory standards that apply to ADUs, including providing a height allowance for two-story ADUs statewide, and further clarified the expected processes for issuance of a building permit within 60 days of the submittal of an application to build an ADU.

How to construct an ADU
on YOUR property
ADUs are a rather unique homeownerinitiated housing type. You can expect that the ADU process will follow these general
steps:

SECURE FINANCING: Common sources of
financing for ADUs include home equity
loans, savings, second mortgages, and/or
funds from family members.

HIRE A DESIGNER: A full set of
professionally drawn site and floor plans by
an architect or design team are needed for
approval of ADUs.

APPLY FOR PERMITS: Site plans and floor
plans are preliminarily reviewed by the
Planning Division. A site visit is
conducted to evaluate the accuracy of
the submitted plans. Planning approval,
full-scale construction drawings, and an
administrative action form are submitted
to the Building and Safety Division for
plan check review. The application is
approved and a building permit is issued
or the applicant is given another list of
corrections to address before approval.

CONSTRUCTION: Once the building
permit is approved and issued, a licensed
contractor can execute the approved
ADU plans. Inspections will be
conducted and a Permit Final will be
issued.

The final step is to ENJOY YOUR ADU!
Can an attached ADU be built on the second story of
a home? Yes. Two-story attached ADUs are allowed
as part of the new height exemptions. Existing State
law already allowed livable space on the second floor
of a residence to be converted to an ADU or JADU.

With changes to the height allowance regulations,
can a detached garage be converted to a two-story
ADU? In most cases, yes, the conversion of an
existing accessory structure to a two-story ADU is
allowed. ADUs built within the footprint of existing
accessory structures are not required to comply
with several ADU regulations including maximum
size restrictions, setbacks, or lot coverage
requirements. However, the conversion of an
existing garage to an ADU is not always the most
quick, simple or cost-effective method to construct
an ADU on a property. Converting a single-story
garage to a two-story ADU will most likely require
deeper footings to reinforce the existing foundation.

Building a two-story ADU also may require approval
from Southern California Edison, as there may be
easements of up to 10 feet to accommodate power
lines. Even with an approved building permit,
homeowners are encouraged to delay construction
until final approval from Edison is granted.

Can an ADU be built within the front setback
between a house and the public street? In certain
situations, yes. The new legislation stressed that
every lot that allows residential uses has a right to
construct at least an 800 sf ADU. If such an ADU
does not fit within the rear or side yard, then the
ADU is allowed within the front setback.

If a property has a nonconforming building, should
the applicant be worried about applying to build an
ADU? This should no longer be a barrier to
constructing an ADU. AB-2221 and SB-897 clarify
that local agencies shall not deny a permit to create
an ADU due to the presence of nonconforming
zoning conditions, building code violations, or
unpermitted structures, as long as they do not
present a threat to public health or safety, and are
not affected by the construction of the ADU.

However, these conditions would need to be
corrected in the future, and most owners choose to
address them with the ADU project.

If the applicant wants to replace a detached garage
with an ADU, do any special processes need to be
followed? The 2023 updates to State law state that
local agencies must review and issue demolition
permits for detached garages to be replaced with an
ADU at the same time as the application to create the
ADU. Further, any requirement for the ADU applicant
to provide written notice or post a placard for the
demolition of a detached garage is prohibited, unless
the property is located within an architecturally and
historically significant historic district.

If a property has an unpermitted ADU built prior to
2018, can it be legalized? Yes. The updated State
ADU regulations state that local jurisdictions must
provide a pathway to legalization of unpermitted
ADUs constructed prior to 2018. Additionally, a local
agency must approve any permit to legalize an
unpermitted ADU built prior to 2018, even if it is in
violation of building standards, State ADU code, or
local ADU ordinances, unless the structure is deemed
substandard, or if the local agency finds that
correcting the violation is necessary to protect the
health and safety of the public or of occupants of the
structure. When a record of the issuance of a building
permit for the construction of an existing ADU does
not exist, the building official shall determine when
the residential unit was constructed, apply the
building standards in effect on that date, and issue a
retroactive building permit for that construction.

However, any new alteration, remodeling, and/ or
addition to the existing unpermitted work is required
to comply with the current California building codes,
and other regulations.

If the current home does not have fire sprinklers,
but fire sprinklers would now be required in a new
structure due to updates to the fire code, is there a
requirement to install sprinklers in a new ADU? No.

The updated State ADU regulations strengthened
language around this issue. Fire sprinklers are not
required in an ADU unless already installed in the
existing home. Also, the installation of fire
sprinklers cannot be required for the primary
dwelling as a condition of approval for an ADU.

Key:

Normal Text = Existing unmodified Code language
Strikethrough Text = Proposed language to be removed from existing Code Underline Text = Proposed language to be added to Code
***** = Existing unmodified Code language not included in exhibit for sake of brevity Code of Ordinances of the City of Santa Fe Springs Chapter 155, Section 155.003 DEFINITIONS is hereby amended as follows:
§ 155.003 DEFINITIONS.

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU). Either a detached or attached dwelling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing primary residence. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. An ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADU may also be located within an existing or proposed primary dwelling unit. An ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADU also includes the following:
(1) An efficiency unit, as defined in Cal. Health and Safety Code § 17958.1. (2) A manufactured home, as defined in California Health and Safety Code § 18007. A factory-built ADU, such as manufactured homes as defined in California Health and Safety Code § 18007, or in the Code of Federal Regulations governing manufactured homes: Code of Federal Regulations Title 24, Housing and Urban Development, Part 3280, Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, Subsection 3280.2, “Definitions."
(3) A factory-built modular ADU that complies with the standards of Chapter 155.644 (D).

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT, JUNIOR (JADU). A junior accessory dwelling unit is a unit that is no more than 500 square feet in size and contained entirely within a singlefamily residence (1) Is no more than 500 square feet in size;
(2) Is contained entirely within an existing or proposed single-family structure; (3) Has or shares sanitation facilities within the existing or proposed single-familty structure;
(4) Includes an efficiency kitchen.
*****
CARRIAGE HOUSE. An ADU that is located above a detached garage. *****
EFFICIENCY KITCHEN. A kitchen that includes each of the following:
(1) An area used for cooking, with kitchen appliances;
(2) A food preparation counter that is adequate for the size of the unit; and (3) Food storage cabinets that are adequate for the size of the unit. *****
IMPACT FEE. A monetary exaction that is charged by the City to a homeowner in connection with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities, public improvements, public services, and community amenities; this does not include fees for processing applications for governmental regulatory actions or approvals or any connection fee or capacity charge charged by a local agency, special district, or water corporation. *****
LIVING AREA. The interior habitable area of a dwelling unit including basements and attics meeting habitable space requirements of the California Building Code with Los Angeles County amendments but not including a garage or any accessory structure. *****
NONCONFORMING ZONING CONDITION. A physical improvement on a property that does not conform with current zoning standards.
*****
OBJECTIVE STANDARDS. Standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal.
*****
PERMIT FEES. A monetary exaction charged to a homeowner in connection with an application for a permit for the reimbursement of expenses incurred during the processing and review of the application, but not fees otherwise classified as impact fees.

PERMITTING AGENCY. Any entity that is involved in the review of a permit for an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit and for which there is no substitute, including, but not limited to, applicable planning departments, building departments, fire departments, utilities, and special districts. *****
PROPOSED DWELLING. A dwelling that is the subject of a permit application and that meets the requirements for permitting.
*****
PUBLIC TRANSIT. A location, including, but not limited to, a bus stop or train station, where the public may access buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, run on fixed routes, and are available to the public. *****
TANDEM PARKING, RESIDENTIAL. Two or more automobiles parked on a permitted parking are lined up behind one another.

Key:

Normal Text = Existing unmodified Code language
Strikethrough Text = Proposed language to be removed from existing Code Underline Text = Proposed language to be added to Code
***** = Existing unmodified Code language not included in exhibit for sake of brevity Code of Ordinances of the City of Santa Fe Springs Chapter 155, Section 155.644 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS is hereby amended as follows:
§ 155.644 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.
(A) Intent. In enacting this section, it is the intent of the city to encourage the provision of accessory dwelling units to meet a variety of economic needs within the city and to implement the goals, objectives, and policies of the housing element of the generalplan.

Accessory dwelling units provide housing for extended family members, students, the elderly in-home health care providers, the disabled, and others, additional housing at below market prices within existing neighborhoods. Homeowners who create accessory dwelling units can benefit from added income, and an increased sense of security.

Allowing accessory dwelling units in residential zones provides needed additional rental housing. This section provides the requirements for the establishment of accessory dwelling units consistent with Cal. Government Code § 65852.2. (B) Interpretation. In cases of conflict between this section and any other provision of this title, the provisions of this section shall prevail. To the extent that any provision of this section is in conflict with State law, the mandatory requirement of State law shall control, but only to the extent legally required.
(C)Applications.
(1) Administrative Review. All accessory dwelling unit applications shall be ministerially approved by the Director of Planning and Development and a permit issued within 60 days upon presentation of a complete application to build an accessory dwelling unit if the plans conform to the standards and criteria provided in subsection (D) and (E) of this section. If the accessory dwelling unit is being proposed in conjunction with a new single-family dwelling, the Director may delay acting on the permit application until the City acts on the permit application for the new single-family dwelling. The City shall grant a delay if requested by the applicant.
(2) Fees. Applications for an accessory dwelling unit shall be accompanied by an application fee and shall be subject to applicable inspection and permit fees. (D) Accessory dwelling unit standards. The following standards and criteria shall apply to the creation of an accessory dwelling unit:
(1) Allowable zones. The accessory dwelling unit shall be allowed only on a lot or parcel that is zoned for single family residential, multifamily residential or mixed use with an existing or proposed residential dwelling.
(2) Number of ADUs. There shall not be more than one accessory dwelling unit per lot or parcel, except as provided for in § 155.644(F)(1)(a). (a) There shall not be more than two ADUs, and one JADU within the walls of the existing or proposed residence, per lot or parcel that is zoned for single family residential use.
(b) On a lot with existing multifamily dwelling structures, at least one unit and up to 25% of the total multifamily dwelling units are allowed within the portions of the existing structure that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, provided that each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings.
(c) On a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling, not more than two detached units, subject to the height limitation set forth in subsection (D)(7), and at least a four-foot side and rear yard setback. The maximum square footage shall comply with the limits set forth in § 155.644(D)(5). The city shall not require any modifications to an existing multifamily dwelling that has a rear or side yard setback of less than four feet if the proposed accessory dwelling unit satisfies the provisions of this subsection. (3) Conformance with zoning and General Plan. An accessory dwelling unit that conforms to the development standards of this section is deemed to be an accessory use and/or structure and will not be considered to exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which it is located and shall be deemed to conform to the zoning and General Plan. (4) Allowable forms. The accessory dwelling unit may be attached to or detached from the primary residential dwelling or located within an existing or proposed singlefamily residence, including a garage, or within an accessory structure. (5) Floor area standards.
(a)The detached or attached accessory dwelling unit with one or less bedroom shall not exceed a total floor area of 850 square feet. (b)The detached or attached accessory dwelling unit with more than one bedroom shall not exceed a total floor area of 1,000 1,200 square feet. (c)If there is an existing primary dwelling, the total floor area of an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 50% of the existing primary dwelling. (dc) The minimum floor area for an accessory dwelling unit shall be 150 square feet.
(6) Setback standards.
(a) The accessory dwelling unit shall comply with the front setback standard applicable to the specific zone in which it is located, unless otherwise modified by this section.
(b) Any portion of tThe accessory dwelling unit that is above 16 feet in height shall be set back no less than four feet from the side and rear property line. (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, no setback shall be required for an existing permitted living area or accessory structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure that is converted to an accessory dwelling unit or to a portion of an accessory dwelling unit. A setback of no more than four feet from the side and rear lot lines shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit that is not converted from an existing structure or a new structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. (d) Carriage houses are allowed in the front setback.
(e) An ADU may be constructed within the front setback, provided it is set back at least four feet from the sidewalk line.
(7) The accessory dwelling unit shall not be greater than 16 feet in height.Allowable ADU Height. Detached accessory dwelling units shall not be greater than 25 feet in height; attached ADUs shall not exceed the maximum allowable height of the base zone. (8) The attached or detached accessory dwelling unit shall be located within, to the rear, or to the side of the existing or proposed primary residence unless the accessory dwelling unit is being constructed in the exact location and to the same dimensions as a previously existing approved accessory structure, including an attached or detached garage.
(98) Regulating code. The accessory dwelling unit shall comply with all building, safety, fire and health codes, and all other applicable laws and regulations. Accessory dwelling units are not required to provide fire sprinklers if sprinklers are not required for the primary dwelling unit.
(109) Manufactured ADUs. Manufactured housing, factory-built accessory dwelling units, and modular accessory dwelling units is are allowed in compliance with the provisions herein and Health and Safety Code § 18007; however, mobile homes, trailers and recreational vehicles shall not be used as accessory dwelling units. (1110) Parking. In addition to all other required off-street parking, parking requirements for accessory dwelling units shall not exceed one space per unit. Parking may also be located in setback areas in locations determined by the city or through tandem parking, unless specific findings are made that such parking is infeasible based upon specific site or regional topographical or fire and life safety conditions, or that it is not permitted anywhere else in the city. Mechanical parking lifts may also be used for replacement parking.
(12) When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of or conversion to an accessory dwelling unit, no replacement parking shall be required. Additionally, no parking shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit in any of the following instances:
(a) Off-street parking is not required for an ADU or JADU. The accessory dwelling unit is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit. (b) When a garage, carport or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of or conversion to an ADU, no replacement parking shall be required. The accessory dwelling unit is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district.
(c) If an applicant chooses to add parking when adding an ADU, parking may be located in setback areas, or through tandem parking, unless specific findings are made that such parking is infeasible based upon specific site or regional topographical or fire and life safety conditions. Mechanical parking lifts may also be used. The accessory dwelling unit is part of the existing primary residence or an existing permitted accessory structure.
(d) When on-street parking permits are required but has not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit.
(e) When there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the accessory dwelling unit.
(1311) The owner of the property on which the accessory dwelling unit is located shall reside in either of the dwelling units on the property as his/her/their principal residence. This is a perpetual requirement that runs with the land, and a restrictive covenant establishing this requirement shall be recorded prior to occupancy of the accessory dwelling unit. This provision shall not apply to an accessory dwelling unit approved between January 1, 2020, and January 1, 2025. Owner occupancy. Owner- occupancy is not required of the primary residence with an attached or detached ADU, or the ADU on the same lot as the primary residence.
(1412)Rentals and separate sale of ADUs. The accessory dwelling unit and the primary residential dwelling may be rented concurrently, provided that the term of the rental is at least 31 days or more. , but the accessory dwelling unit shall not be sold or owned separately from the primary dwelling, An accessory dwelling unit may be sold or conveyed separately from the primary residence, only if:
(a) The accessory dwelling unit is sold to a qualified buyer, including persons and families of low or moderate income, as that term is defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, and all of the following apply:
(I) The accessory dwelling unit or the primary dwelling was built or developed by a qualified nonprofit corporation, one that is organized pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that has received a welfare exemption under Section 214.15 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for properties intended to be sold to low-income families who participate in a special no-interest loan program. (II) There is an enforceable restriction on the use of the land pursuant to a recorded contract between the qualified buyer and the qualified nonprofit corporation that satisfies all of the requirements specified in paragraph (10) of subdivision (a) of Section 402.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(III)The property is held pursuant to a recorded tenancy in common agreement that includes all of the following:
(A) The agreement allocates to each qualified buyer an undivided, unequal interest in the property based on the size of the dwelling that each qualified buyer occupies.
(B) A repurchase option that requires the qualified buyer to first offer the qualified nonprofit corporation to buy the accessory dwelling unit or primary dwelling if the buyer desires to sell or convey the property.
(C) A requirement that the qualified buyer occupy the accessory dwelling unit or primary dwelling as the buyer’s principal residence. (D)Affordability restrictions on the sale and conveyance of the accessory dwelling unit or primary dwelling that ensure the accessory dwelling unit and primary dwelling will be preserved for low-income housing for 45 years for owneroccupied housing units and will be sold or resold to a qualified buyer. (E) The tenancy in common agreement shall include all of the following:
(i) Delineation of all areas of the property that are for the exclusive use of a cotenant. Each cotenant shall agree not to claim a right of occupancy to an area delineated for the exclusive use of another cotenant, provided that the latter cotenant’s obligations to each of the other cotenants have been satisfied. (ii) Delineation of each cotenant’s responsibility for the costs of taxes, insurance, utilities, general maintenance and repair, improvements, and any other costs, obligations, or liabilities associated with the property. This delineation shall only be binding on the parties to the agreement, and shall not supersede or obviate the liability, whether joint and several or otherwise, of the parties for any cost, obligation, or liability associated with the property where such liability is otherwise established by law or by agreement with a third party.
(iii) Procedures for dispute resolution among the parties before resorting to legal action.
(IV) A grant deed naming the grantor, grantee, and describing the property interests being transferred shall be recorded in the county in which the property is located.

A Preliminary Change of Ownership Report shall be filed concurrently with this grant deed pursuant to Section 480.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. (V) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (f) of Section 65852.2, if requested by a utility providing service to the primary residence, the accessory dwelling unit has a separate water, sewer, or electrical connection to that utility. (b) An ADU may be sold or conveyed separately from the primary home as a condominium, subject to the following requirements:
(I) The condominiums shall be created pursuant to the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Part 5 (commencing with Section 4000) of Division 4 of the Civil Code).
(II) The condominiums shall be created in conformance with all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410)) and all objective requirements of a local subdivision ordinance. (III)Before recordation of the condominium plan, a safety inspection of the accessory dwelling unit shall be conducted, as evidenced either through a certificate of occupancy from the local agency, or a housing quality standards report from a building inspector certified by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. (IV)The following requirements must be met prior to recordation of the condominium plan with the county recorder:
(A) Neither a subdivision map nor a condominium plan shall be recorded with the county recorder in the county where the real property is located without each lienholder’s consent. The following shall apply to the consent of a lienholder:
(i) A lienholder may refuse to give consent.
(ii) A lienholder may consent, provided that any terms and conditions required by the lienholder are satisfied.
(B) Prior to recordation of the initial or any subsequent modifications to the condominium plan, written evidence of the lienholder’s consent shall be provided to the county recorder, along with a signed statement from each lienholder that states as follows:
(i) (Name of lienholder) hereby consents to the recording of this condominium plan in their sole and absolute discretion, and the borrower has or will satisfy any additional terms and conditions the lienholder may have.” (C)The lienholder’s consent shall be included on the condominium plan, or on a separate form attached to the condominium plan, that includes the following information:
(i) The lienholder’s signature.
(ii) The name of the record owner or ground lessee.
(iii) The legal description of the real property.
(iv) The identities of all parties with an interest in the real property, as reflected in the real property records.
(D)The lienholder’s consent shall be recorded in the office of the county recorder of the county in which the real property is located. (c) An ADU on a property that is zoned for single family residential may be conveyed separately from the primary unit using a lot split, subject to the provisions of Senate Bill 9.
(1513) Utility connection or capacity charges. Accessory dwelling units shall not be considered new residential uses for the purposes of calculating local agency connection fees or capacity charges for utilities, including water and sewer service. (a) For attached units or units located within the living area of proposed or the existing single-family dwelling and meeting the definition of § 155.644(F)(1)(a) below, the city shall not require the applicant to install a new or separate utility connection between the accessory dwelling unit and the utility or impose a related connection fee or capacity charge. Such requirements and charges may be imposed when the accessory dwelling unit is being constructed in connection with a proposed singlefamily residential dwelling. (b) For all other accessory dwelling units other than those described in § 155.644(D)(1614)(a) below, the city may require a new or separate utility connection directly between the accessory dwelling unit and the utility. The connection fee or capacity charge shall be proportionate to the burden of the proposed ADU upon the water or sewer system based upon either its size or the number of its plumbing fixtures, and may not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the water or sewer service.
(1614) Impact fees.
(a) No impact fee shall be imposed on any accessory dwelling unit less than 750 square feet in size, except for impact fees used to fund schools, which shall not be imposed on any ADU of or less than 500 square feet in size. (b) For accessory dwelling units 750 square feet or greater, impact fees shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling. (c) All applicable public service and recreation impact fees shall be paid prior to occupancy in accordance with Cal. Government Code §§ 66000 et seq. and 66012 et seq.
(d) For purposes of this section, "impact fee" shall have the same meaning as set forth in Cal. Government Code § 65852.2(f).
(1715) Prior approvals. The provisions of this section shall not apply to any accessory dwelling units for which the city issued conditional use permits prior to the effective date of this section.
(18) Prior to obtaining a building permit for the accessory dwelling unit, a deed restriction, in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the County Recorder to evidence and give notice of the requirements of this section. (E) Design standards.
(1) The accessory dwelling unit shall be designed to be architecturally compatible with the primary dwelling. A site plan, elevations and floor plan depicting said architectural compatibility shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Development for ministerial review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. A site plan, elevations and floor plan depicting the location of the accessory dwelling unit in relation to the primary dwelling shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Development for ministerial review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. (2) When feasible, windows facing an adjoining residential property shall be designed to protect the privacy of neighbors. If window placement does not protect privacy, then fencing or landscaping might be used to provide screening. Windows and doors of an ADU shall not have a direct line of sight to an adjoining residential property.

Fencing, landscaping, or privacy glass may be used to provide screening and prevent a direct line of sight. Windows and glass doors that face an adjoining property and are within fifteen (15) feet of a property line that is not a right-of-way line must either be (for windows) clerestory with the bottom of the glass at least six (6) feet above the finished floor, or (for windows and for doors) utilize frosted or obscure glass. (3) An accessory dwelling unit shall have a separate exterior entrance from the primary dwelling unit.
(4) To the maximum extent feasible, the accessory dwelling unit shall not alter the appearance of the primary single-family dwelling unit.
(5) When feasible, no more than one exterior entrance on the front or on any streetfacing side of the primary dwelling unit and accessory dwelling unit combined. (64) No exterior stairway shall be located on the front or on any street-facing side of the accessory dwelling unit.
(F) Mandatory ADU Application Approvals.
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the city shall ministerially approve an application for any of the following accessory dwelling units within a residential or mixed-use zone:
(a) A junior or accessory dwelling unit within the existing or proposed space of a single-family dwelling or accessory structure subject to the following requirements:

1. An expansion of up to 150 square feet shall be allowed in an accessory structure that is converted to an ADU solely for the purposes of accommodating ingress and egress.

2. The junior or accessory dwelling unit shall have exterior access separate from the existing or proposed single-family dwelling.

3. The side and rear setbacks shall be sufficient for fire and building and safety.

4. If the unit is a junior accessory dwelling unit, it shall comply with the requirements of § 155.644.1 below.
(b) One detached or attached accessory dwelling unit subject to the following requirements:

1. The accessory dwelling unit shall be set back no less than four feet from the side and rear property line.

2. The accessory dwelling unit shall be on a lot or parcel with an existing or proposed single-family dwelling.

3. The accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 800 square feet in size.

4. The accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 16 feet in height.

5. A junior accessory dwelling unit may be developed with this type of detached accessory dwelling unit, it shall comply with all requirements of § 155.644.1 below.
(c) On a lot with a multifamily dwelling structure, up to 25% of the total multifamily dwelling units, but no less than one unit, shall be allowed within the portions of the existing structure that are not used as livable space, including, but no limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, provided that each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings.
(d) On a lot with a multifamily dwelling structure, up to two detached units, provided that neither unit is greater than 16 feet in height, is provided with at least a four foot side and rear yard setback. The maximum square footage shall comply with the limits set forth in § 155.644(D)(5).
(2) For those accessory dwelling units which require mandatory approval, the city shall not require the correction of legal, nonconforming zoning conditions. (1) A permit application for an ADU or a JADU shall be considered and approved ministerially without discretionary review or a hearing. The City and any associated permitting agencies including, but not limited to, applicable planning departments, building departments, consultants or contractors working as agents of the City, utilities, and special districts, shall approve and issue a building permit or deny the application to create or serve an ADU or a JADU within 60 calendar days after receiving a completed application if there is an existing primary dwelling on the lot and if it meets the minimum ADU and/or JADU standards of this chapter.
(a) If the City and any associated permitting agencies has not approved or denied the completed application within 60 days, the application shall be deemed approved and a building permit issued for its construction.
(b) If the City or any associated permitting agencies denies an application for an ADU or JADU pursuant to paragraph (a), the City and any associated permitting agencies shall, within the 60 day time period, transmit to the applicant a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied. (c) If the permit application to create an ADU or a JADU is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family or multifamily dwelling on the lot, the City and any associated permitting agencies may delay approving or denying the permit application for the ADU or JADU until the City approves or denies the permit application to create the new dwelling, but the application to create the ADU or JADU shall be considered without discretionary review or hearing.
(d) If the applicant requests a delay, the 60-day time period shall be paused for the period of the delay. If the permit application is returned to the applicant with a list of corrections requested to comply with applicable codes and regulations, any accounting of the 60-day time period shall be paused for the period of time until the applicant resubmits a corrected application. (e) A demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU shall be reviewed with the application for the ADU, and a building permit for the ADU shall be issued at the same time as the demolition permit; the applicant shall not be required to provide written notice or post a placard for the demolition of a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU.
(2) The City and any associated permitting agencies including, but not limited to, applicable planning departments, building departments, consultants or contractors working as agents of the City, utilities, and special districts, shall approve and issue a building permit or deny the application to create or serve an accessory dwelling unit plan within 30 calendar days after receiving a completed application, if:
(a) The plan been pre-approved by the City within the current triennial California Building Standards Code rulemaking cycle, or (b) The plan is identical to a plan used in an application for a detached accessory dwelling unit approved by the City within the current triennial California Building Standards Code rulemaking cycle.
(3) The City shall not require the correction of existing legal, nonconforming zoning conditions prior to issuing a permit for an ADU.
(G)Enforcement. Until January 1, 2030, the city shall issue a statement along with a notice to correct a violation of any provision of any building standard relating to an accessory dwelling unit that substantially provides as follows: Existing Units. (1) You have been issued an order to correct violations or abate nuisances relating to your accessory dwelling unit. If you believe that this correction or abatement is not necessary to protect the public health and safety you may file an application with the City Planning Department. If the city determines that enforcement is not required to protect the health and safety, enforcement shall be delayed for a period of five years from the date of the original notice. Existing ADUs that have not been approved by the City are required to obtain approval in order to be considered a lawful use. An application for an unpermitted ADU that was constructed before January 1, 2018 shall not be denied due to violations of building standards, or if the unpermitted ADU does not comply with Chapter 155 of the Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code, unless it is found that correcting the violation is necessary to protect the health and safety of the public or occupants of the structure pursuant to Section 17920.3 of the Health and Safety Code. An application for an unpermitted ADU for which a building permit does not exist shall be approved based the version of the applicable Building Standards Code in effect when the residential unit was determined to be constructed for the purposes of issuing a building permit; the appropriate enforcement official may make a determination of the date of construction, and issue a retroactive building permit for that construction. (2) This provision shall only apply if the accessory dwelling unit was built before January 1, 2020 and after July 25, 2020. The City shall delay enforcement of building standards that are not a matter of public health and safety for existing ADUs upon request of the ADU owner, as follows:
(a) ADUs built prior to January 1, 2020 are eligible, or ADUs built on or after January 1, 2020 at a time that the City had a noncompliant ADU ordinance. (b) Until January 1, 2030, the City shall issue a statement along with a notice to correct a violation of any provision of any building standard relating to an ADU that substantially provides as follows:
(i) You have been issued an order to correct violations or abate nuisances relating to your ADU. If you believe that this correction or abatement is not necessary to protect the public health and safety you may file an application with the City Planning Department. If the city determines that enforcement is not required to protect the health and safety, enforcement shall be delayed for a period of five years from the date of the original notice.
*****
Key:

Normal Text = Existing unmodified Code language
Strikethrough Text = Proposed language to be removed from existing Code Underline Text = Proposed language to be added to Code
***** = Existing unmodified Code language not included in exhibit for sake of brevity Code of Ordinances of the City of Santa Fe Springs Chapter 155, Section 155.644.1 JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS is hereby amended as follows:
§ 155.644.1 JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.
(A) Intent. In enacting this section, it is the intent of the city to encourage the provision of junior accessory dwelling units to meet a variety of economic needs within the city and to implement the goals, objectives, and policies of the housing element of the general plan. Junior accessory dwelling units provide housing for extended family members, students, the elderly in-home health care providers, the disabled, and others, at below market prices within existing neighborhoods. Homeowners who create junior accessory dwelling units can benefit from added income, and an increased sense of security.

Allowing junior accessory dwelling units in residential zones provides needed additional rental housing. This section provides the requirements for the establishment of junior accessory dwelling units consistent with Cal. Government Code § 65852.22. (B) Administrative review. All junior accessory dwelling unit applications shall be ministerially approved by the Director of Planning and Development and a permit issued within 60 days upon presentation of a complete application to provide a junior accessory dwelling unit if the plans conform to the standards and criteria provided in § 155.644.1(C) and (D). If the junior accessory dwelling unit is being proposed in conjunction with a new single-family dwelling, the Director may delay acting on the permit application until the city acts on the permit application for the new single-family dwelling. The city shall grant a delay if requested by the applicant.
(C)Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards. The following standards and criteria shall apply to the creation of a junior accessory dwelling unit:
(1) Number allowed. A maximum of one junior accessory dwelling unit shall be permitted No more than two ADUs, and one JADU within the wall of the existing or proposed residence, are allowed per residential lot containing an existing or proposed single-family dwelling. Junior accessory dwelling units do not count towards the density requirements of the general plan or zoning ordinance.
(2) Owner occupancy. The property owner shall occupy either the main singlefamily dwelling or the junior accessory dwelling unit. (3) Tenure. The junior accessory dwelling unit or the main single-family dwelling may be rented, provided the rental term is at least 31 days or more, but the junior accessory dwelling unit shall not be sold or owned separately from the single-family dwelling
(4) Allowable location. The junior accessory dwelling unit must be created within the existing walls of an existing single-family dwelling. (5) Size. The junior accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 500 square feet in size.
(6) Entrance. The junior accessory dwelling unit shall include a separate exterior entrance from the main entrance to the single-family home. An interior entry to the main living area shall be required if the junior accessory dwelling unit shares sanitary facilities with the single-family home. The junior accessory dwelling unit may include a second interior doorway for sound attenuation.
(7) Kitchen required. The junior accessory dwelling unit shall include a food preparation area, requiring and limited to the following components:
(a) A cooking facility with appliancesAn area used for cooking, with kitchen appliance; and
(b) A food preparation counter and storage cabinets, which may not be required to exceed six feet in length.
(8) Parking. No additional off-street parking is required beyond that required for the main single-family dwelling.
(9) Utility service. A separate water connection or meter, and a separate sewer service connection are not required for a junior accessory dwelling unit. Water and sewer service for the junior accessory dwelling unit is shared with the main single-family dwelling unit.
(10) Applicable codes. The junior accessory dwelling unit shall comply with all applicable building standards and shall be subject to permit and inspection fees to ensure such compliance. Fire sprinklers shall only be required if they are required in the existing or proposed single-family residence.
(11) Regulations and connection fees. For the purposes of applying any fire or life protection ordinance or regulation, or providing service water, sewer, or power, including a connection fee, a junior accessory dwelling unit shall not be considered to be a separate or new dwelling unit.
(12) Deed restriction. Prior to obtaining a building permit for the junior accessory dwelling unit, a deed restriction, in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the County Recorder to evidence and give notice of the requirements of this section.
(D)Enforcement. The city shall not require the correction of a legal, nonconforming zoning conditions for approval of a junior accessory dwelling unit.

Key:

Normal Text = Existing unmodified Code language
Strikethrough Text = Proposed language to be removed from existing Code Underline Text = Proposed language to be added to Code
***** = Existing unmodified Code language not included in exhibit for sake of brevity Code of Ordinances of the City of Santa Fe Springs Chapter 155, Section 155.003 DEFINITIONS is hereby amended as follows:
§ 155.003 DEFINITIONS.

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU). Either a detached or attached dwelling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing primary residence. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. An ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADU may also be located within an existing or proposed primary dwelling unit. An ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADU also includes the following:
(1) An efficiency unit, as defined in Cal. Health and Safety Code § 17958.1. (2) A manufactured home, as defined in California Health and Safety Code § 18007. A factory-built ADU, such as manufactured homes as defined in California Health and Safety Code § 18007, or in the Code of Federal Regulations governing manufactured homes: Code of Federal Regulations Title 24, Housing and Urban Development, Part 3280, Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, Subsection 3280.2, “Definitions."
(3) A factory-built modular ADU that complies with the standards of Chapter 155.644 (D).

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT, JUNIOR (JADU). A junior accessory dwelling unit is a unit that is no more than 500 square feet in size and contained entirely within a singlefamily residence (1) Is no more than 500 square feet in size;
(2) Is contained entirely within an existing or proposed single-family structure; (3) Has or shares sanitation facilities within the existing or proposed single-familty structure;
(4) Includes an efficiency kitchen.
*****
CARRIAGE HOUSE. An ADU that is located above a detached garage. *****
EFFICIENCY KITCHEN. A kitchen that includes each of the following:
(1) An area used for cooking, with kitchen appliances;
(2) A food preparation counter that is adequate for the size of the unit; and (3) Food storage cabinets that are adequate for the size of the unit. *****
IMPACT FEES. A monetary exaction that is charged by the City to a property owner and/or project applicant in connection with approval of a project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities, public improvements, public services, and community amenities; this does not include fees for processing applications for governmental regulatory actions or approvals or any connection fee or capacity charge charged by a local agency, special district, or water corporation. *****
LIVING AREA. The interior habitable area of a dwelling unit including basements and attics meeting habitable space requirements of the California Building Code with Los Angeles County amendments but not including a garage or any accessory structure. *****
OBJECTIVE STANDARDS. Standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal.
*****
PERMIT FEES. A monetary exaction charged to a property owner and/or project applicant in connection with an application for a permit for the reimbursement of expenses incurred during the processing and review of the application, but not fees otherwise classified as impact fees.

PERMITTING AGENCY. Any entity that is involved in the review of a permit and for which there is no substitute, including, but not limited to, applicable planning departments, building departments, fire departments, utilities, and special districts. *****
PROPOSED DWELLING. A dwelling that is the subject of a permit application and that meets the requirements for permitting.
*****
PUBLIC TRANSIT. A location, including, but not limited to, a bus stop or train station, where the public may access buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, run on fixed routes, and are available to the public. *****
TANDEM PARKING, RESIDENTIAL. Two or more automobiles parked on a permitted parking are lined up behind one another.

Key:

Normal Text = Existing unmodified Code language
Strikethrough Text = Proposed language to be removed from existing Code Underline Text = Proposed language to be added to Code
***** = Existing unmodified Code language not included in exhibit for sake of brevity Code of Ordinances of the City of Santa Fe Springs Chapter 155, Section 155.644 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS is hereby amended as follows:
§ 155.644 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.
(A) Intent. In enacting this section, it is the intent of the city to encourage the provision of accessory dwelling units to meet a variety of economic needs within the city and to implement the goals, objectives, and policies of the housing element of the general plan.

Accessory dwelling units provide housing for extended family members, students, the elderly in-home health care providers, the disabled, and others, additional housing at below market prices within existing neighborhoods. Homeowners who create accessory dwelling units can benefit from added income, and an increased sense of security.

Allowing accessory dwelling units in residential zones provides needed additional rental housing. This section provides the requirements for the establishment of accessory dwelling units consistent with Cal. Government Code § 65852.2. (B) Interpretation. In cases of conflict between this section and any other provision of this title, the provisions of this section shall prevail. To the extent that any provision of this section is in conflict with State law, the mandatory requirement of State law shall control, but only to the extent legally required.
(C) Applications.
(1) Administrative Review. All accessory dwelling unit applications shall be ministerially approved by the Director of Planning and Development, or his/her designee, and a permit issued within 60 days upon presentation receipt of a completed application to build an accessory dwelling unit if the plans conform to the complying with the standards and criteria provided set forth in § 155.644(D) and (E) this section. If an application for accessory dwelling unit is denied within those 60 days, the applicant will be provided with a list of defective items and description of how the deficiencies can be remedied. If the application is neither approved nor denied within the 60 days after a complete application is submitted, the application is deemed approved. If the accessory dwelling unit is being proposed in conjunction with a new single-family dwelling, the Director may delay acting on the accessory dwelling unit permit application until the city acts on the permit application for the new single-family dwelling. If the applicant requests a delay, Tthe city shall grant a delay if requested by the applicant andand the the city’s 60-day period for consideration will be tolled during thatfor the period of the requested delay.
(2) Fees. Applications for an accessory dwelling unit shall be accompanied by an application fee and shall be subject to applicable inspection and permit fees. (D) Accessory dwelling unit standards. The following standards and criteria shall apply to the creation of an accessory dwelling unit:
(1) Allowable zones. The accessory dwelling unit shall be allowed only on a lot or parcel that is zoned for single family residential, multifamily residential or mixed use with an existing or proposed residential dwelling.
(2) Number of ADUs. There shall not be more than one accessory dwelling unit per lot or parcel, except as provided for in § 155.644(F)(1)(a). (a) There shall not be more than one ADU, and one JADU within the walls of the existing or proposed residence, per lot or parcel that is zoned for single family residential use.
(b) On a lot with existing multifamily dwelling structures, at least one unit and up to 25% of the total multifamily dwelling units are allowed within the portions of the existing structure that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, provided that each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings.
(c) On a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling, not more than two detached units, subject to the height limitation set forth in subsection (D)(7), and at least a four-foot side and rear yard setback. The maximum square footage shall comply with the limits set forth in § 155.644(D)(5). The city shall not require any modifications to an existing multifamily dwelling that has a rear or side yard setback of less than four feet if the proposed accessory dwelling unit satisfies the provisions of this subsection. (3) Conformance with zoning and General Plan. An accessory dwelling unit that conforms to the development standards of this section is deemed to be an accessory use and/or structure and will not be considered to exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which it is located and shall be deemed to conform to the zoning and General Plan. (4) Allowable forms. The accessory dwelling unit may be attached to or detached from the primary residential dwelling or located within an existing or proposed singlefamily residence, including a garage, or within an accessory structure. (5) Floor area standards.
(a) The detached or attached accessory dwelling unit with one or less bedroom shall not exceed a total floor area of 850 square feet. (b) The detached or attached accessory dwelling unit with more than one bedroom shall not exceed a total floor area of 1,000 1,200 square feet. (c) If there is an existing primary dwelling, the total floor area of an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 50% of the existing primary dwelling. (dc) The minimum floor area for an accessory dwelling unit shall be 150 square feet.
(6) Setback standards.
(a) The accessory dwelling unit shall comply with the front setback standard applicable to the specific zone in which it is located, unless doing so would prohibit the construction of at least an 850 square foot accessory dwelling unit. The first priority placement shall be in the rear of a property, developed in compliance with the required setbacks. If proposed at the front of a property, the front setback shall be maximized to the extent allowed within these requirements. Notwithstanding any other provision in this section, an accessory dwelling unit that encroaches into the front yard setback shall be limited to a total of eight hundred square feet otherwise modified by this section. (b) The accessory dwelling unit shall be set back no less than four feet from the side and rear property lines.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, no setback shall be required for an existing permitted living area or accessory structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure that is converted to an accessory dwelling unit or to a portion of an accessory dwelling unit. A setback of no more than four feet from the side and rear lot lines shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit that is not converted from an existing structure or a new structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. (7) The accessory dwelling unit shall not be greater than 16 feet in height The height of an accessory dwelling unit shall be as follows:
(a) A detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit shall not be greater than 16 feet in height. (b) A detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21155, shall not be greater than 18 feet in height. Two additional feet in height is allowed to accommodate roof pitch of the accessory dwelling unit to align with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit.
(c) A detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily multistory dwelling shall not be greater than 18 feet in height. (d) For an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling, an accessory dwelling unit shall not be higher than 25 feet or the height of the primary dwelling, whichever is lower.
(e) An accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed two stories. (8) Location. The attached or detached accessory dwelling unit shall be located within, or if outside of the existing walls of the existing or proposed primary residence, preferably to the rear, or to the side of the existing or proposed primary residence unless the accessory dwelling unit is being constructed in the exact location and to the same dimensions as an previously existing approved accessory structure, including an attached or detached garage.
(9) Regulating code. The accessory dwelling unit shall comply with all building, safety, fire and health codes, and all other applicable laws and regulations. Accessory dwelling units are not required to provide fire sprinklers if sprinklers are not required for the primary dwelling unit.
(10) Manufacturing ADUs. Manufactured housing, factory-built ADUS, and modular ADUs is are allowed in compliance with the provisions herein and Cal. Health and Safety Code § 18007; however, mobile homes, trailers and recreational vehicles shall not be used as accessory dwelling units.
(11) Parking. In addition to all other required off-street parking, parking requirements for accessory dwelling units shall not exceed one space per unit. Parking may also be located in setback areas in locations determined by the city or through tandem parking, unless specific findings are made that such parking is infeasible based upon specific site or regional topographical or fire and life safety conditions, or that it is not permitted anywhere else in the city. Mechanical parking lifts may also be used for replacement parking.
(12) Replacement parking. When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of or conversion to an accessory dwelling unit, no replacement parking shall be required. Additionally, no parking shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit in any of the following instances:
(a) The accessory dwelling unit is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit.
(b) The accessory dwelling unit is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district.
(c) The accessory dwelling unit is part of the proposed or existing primary residence or an existing permitted accessory structure. (d) When on-street parking permits are required but has not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit.
(e) When there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the accessory dwelling unit.
(f) When a permit application for an accessory dwelling unit is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family dwelling or a new multifamily dwelling on the same lot, provided that the accessory dwelling unit or the parcel satisfies any other criteria listed in this subsection.
(13) Rentals and separate sale of ADUs. The accessory dwelling unit and the primary residential dwelling may be rented concurrently, provided that the term of the rental is at least 31 days or more. , but the accessory dwelling unit shall not be sold or owned separately from the primary dwelling, An accessory dwelling unit may be sold or conveyed separately from the primary residence, only if:
(a) The accessory dwelling unit is sold to a qualified buyer, including persons and families of low or moderate income, as that term is defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, and all of the following apply:
(I) The accessory dwelling unit or the primary dwelling was built or developed by a qualified nonprofit corporation, one that is organized pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that has received a welfare exemption under Section 214.15 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for properties intended to be sold to low-income families who participate in a special no-interest loan program. (II) There is an enforceable restriction on the use of the land pursuant to a recorded contract between the qualified buyer and the qualified nonprofit corporation that satisfies all of the requirements specified in paragraph (10) of subdivision (a) of Section 402.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(III)The property is held pursuant to a recorded tenancy in common agreement that includes all of the following:
(A) The agreement allocates to each qualified buyer an undivided, unequal interest in the property based on the size of the dwelling that each qualified buyer occupies.
(B) A repurchase option that requires the qualified buyer to first offer the qualified nonprofit corporation to buy the accessory dwelling unit or primary dwelling if the buyer desires to sell or convey the property.
(C) A requirement that the qualified buyer occupy the accessory dwelling unit or primary dwelling as the buyer’s principal residence. (D) Affordability restrictions on the sale and conveyance of the accessory dwelling unit or primary dwelling that ensure the accessory dwelling unit and primary dwelling will be preserved for low-income housing for 45 years for owneroccupied housing units and will be sold or resold to a qualified buyer. (E) The tenancy in common agreement shall include all of the following:
(i) Delineation of all areas of the property that are for the exclusive use of a cotenant. Each cotenant shall agree not to claim a right of occupancy to an area delineated for the exclusive use of another cotenant, provided that the latter cotenant’s obligations to each of the other cotenants have been satisfied. (ii) Delineation of each cotenant’s responsibility for the costs of taxes, insurance, utilities, general maintenance and repair, improvements, and any other costs, obligations, or liabilities associated with the property. This delineation shall only be binding on the parties to the agreement, and shall not supersede or obviate the liability, whether joint and several or otherwise, of the parties for any cost, obligation, or liability associated with the property where such liability is otherwise established by law or by agreement with a third party.
(iii) Procedures for dispute resolution among the parties before resorting to legal action.
(IV) A grant deed naming the grantor, grantee, and describing the property interests being transferred shall be recorded in the county in which the property is located.

A Preliminary Change of Ownership Report shall be filed concurrently with this grant deed pursuant to Section 480.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. (V) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (f) of Section 65852.2, if requested by a utility providing service to the primary residence, the accessory dwelling unit has a separate water, sewer, or electrical connection to that utility. (14) Rentals and tenure. The accessory dwelling unit and the primary residential dwelling may be rented concurrently provided that the term of the rental is at least 31 days or more, but the accessory dwelling unit shall not be sold or owned separately from the primary dwelling, unless the owner is another governmental agency, land trust, housing organization, or qualified non-profit.
(15) Utility connection or capacity charges. Accessory dwelling units shall not be considered new residential uses for the purposes of calculating local agency connection fees or capacity charges for utilities, including water and sewer service. (a) For attached units or units located within the living area of proposed or the existing single-family dwelling and meeting the definition of § 155.644(F)(1)(a) below, the city shall not require the applicant to install a new or separate utility connection between the accessory dwelling unit and the utility or impose a related connection fee or capacity charge. Such requirements and charges may be imposed when the accessory dwelling unit is being constructed in connection with a proposed new single-family residential dwelling.
(b) For all other accessory dwelling units other than those described in § 155.644(D)(15)(a) above, the city may require a new or separate utility connection directly between the accessory dwelling unit and the utility. The connection fee or capacity charge shall be proportionate in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. burden of the proposed accessory dwelling unit upon the water or sewer system based upon either its size or the number of its plumbing fixtures, and may not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the water or sewer service.
(16) Impact fees.
(a) No impact fee shall be imposed on any accessory dwelling unit less than 750 square feet in size, except for impact fees used to fund school, which shall not be imposed on any ADU of or less than 500 square feet in size. (b) For accessory dwelling units 750 square feet or greater, impact fees shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling. (c) All applicable public service and recreation impact fees shall be paid prior to occupancy in accordance with Cal. Government Code §§ 66000 et seq. and 66012 et seq.
(d) For purposes of this section, "impact fee" shall have the same meaning as set forth in Cal. Government Code § 65852.2(f).
(1716) Prior approvals. The provisions of this section shall not apply to any accessory dwelling units for which the city issued conditional use permits prior to the effective date of this section.
(18) Prior to obtaining a building permit for the accessory dwelling unit, a deed restriction, in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the County Recorder to evidence and give notice of the requirements of this section. (E) Design standards.
(1) The accessory dwelling unit shall be designed to be architecturally compatible with the primary dwelling. A site plan, elevations and floor plan depicting said architectural compatibility shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Development for ministerial review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. A site plan, elevations and floor plan depicting the location of the ADU in relation to the primary dwelling shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Development for ministerial review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. (2) When feasible, windows facing an adjoining residential property shall be designed to protect the privacy of neighbors. If window placement does not protect privacy, then fencing or landscaping might be used to provide screening. Windows and doors of an ADU shall not have a direct line of sight to an adjoining residential property.

Fencing, landscaping, or privacy glass may be used to provide screening and prevent a direct line of sight. Windows and glass doors that face an adjoining property and are within fifteen (15) feet of a property line that is not a right-of-way line must either be (for windows) clerestory with the bottom of the glass at least six (6) feet above the finished floor, or (for windows and for doors) utilize frosted or obscure glass. (3) An accessory dwelling unit shall have a separate exterior entrance from the primary dwelling unit.
(4) To the maximum extent feasible, the accessory dwelling unit shall not alter the appearance of the primary single-family dwelling unit.
(5) When feasible, no more than one exterior entrance on the front or on any streetfacing side of the primary dwelling unit and accessory dwelling unit combined. (64) No exterior stairway shall be located on the front or on any street-facing side of the accessory dwelling unit.
(F) Mandatory ADU application approvals.
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the city shall ministerially approve an application for any of the following accessory dwelling units within a residential or mixed-use zone:
(a) A junior or accessory dwelling unit within the existing or proposed space of a single-family dwelling or accessory structure subject to the following requirements:

1. An expansion of up to 150 square feet shall be allowed in an accessory structure that is converted to an ADU solely for the purposes of accommodating ingress and egress.

2. The junior or accessory dwelling unit shall have exterior access separate from the existing or proposed single-family dwelling.

3. The side and rear setbacks shall be sufficient for fire and building and safety.

4. If the unit is a junior accessory dwelling unit, it shall comply with the requirements of § 155.644.1 below.
(b) One detached or attached accessory dwelling unit subject to the following requirements:

1. The accessory dwelling unit shall be set back no less than four feet from the side and rear property line.

2. The accessory dwelling unit shall be on a lot or parcel with an existing or proposed single-family dwelling.

3. The accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 800 square feet in size.

4. The accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 16 feet in height.

5. A junior accessory dwelling unit may be developed with this type of detached accessory dwelling unit, it shall comply with all requirements of § 155.644.1 below.
(c) On a lot with a multifamily dwelling structure, up to 25% of the total multifamily dwelling units, but no less than one unit, shall be allowed within the portions of the existing structure that are not used as livable space, including, but no limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, provided that each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings.
(d) On a lot with a multifamily dwelling structure, up to two detached units, provided that neither unit is greater than 16 feet in height, is provided with at least a four foot side and rear yard setback. The maximum square footage shall comply with the limits set forth in § 155.644(D)(5).
(2) For those accessory dwelling units which require mandatory approval, the city shall not require the correction of legal, nonconforming zoning conditions. (1) A permit application for an ADU or a JADU shall be considered and approved ministerially without discretionary review or a hearing. The City and any associated permitting agencies including, but not limited to, applicable planning departments, building departments, consultants or contractors working as agents of the City, utilities, and special districts, shall approve and issue a building permit or deny the application to create or serve an ADU or a JADU within 60 calendar days after receiving a completed application if there is an existing primary dwelling on the lot and if it meets the minimum ADU and/or JADU standards of this chapter.
(a) If the City and any associated permitting agencies has not approved or denied the completed application within 60 days, the application shall be deemed approved and a building permit issued for its construction.
(b) If the City or any associated permitting agencies denies an application for an ADU or JADU pursuant to paragraph (a), the City and any associated permitting agencies shall, within the 60 day time period, transmit to the applicant a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied. (c) If the permit application to create an ADU or a JADU is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family or multifamily dwelling on the lot, the City and any associated permitting agencies may delay approving or denying the permit application for the ADU or JADU until the City approves or denies the permit application to create the new dwelling, but the application to create the ADU or JADU shall be considered without discretionary review or hearing.
(d) If the applicant requests a delay, the 60-day time period shall be paused for the period of the delay. If the permit application is returned to the applicant with a list of corrections requested to comply with applicable codes and regulations, any accounting of the 60-day time period shall be paused for the period of time until the applicant resubmits a corrected application. (e) A demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU shall be reviewed with the application for the ADU, and a building permit for the ADU shall be issued at the same time as the demolition permit; the applicant shall not be required to provide written notice or post a placard for the demolition of a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU.
(2) The City shall not require the correction of existing legal, nonconforming zoning conditions prior to issuing a permit for an ADU.
(G) Enforcement. Until January 1, 2030, the city shall issue a statement along with a notice to correct a violation of any provision of any building standard relating to an accessory dwelling unit that substantially provides as follows: Existing Units. (1) You have been issued an order to correct violations or abate nuisances relating to your accessory dwelling unit. If you believe that this correction or abatement is not necessary to protect the public health and safety you may file an application with the City Planning Department. If the city determines that enforcement is not required to protect the health and safety, enforcement shall be delayed for a period of five years from the date of the original notice. Existing ADUs that have not been approved by the City are required to obtain approval in order to be considered a lawful use. An application for an unpermitted ADU that was constructed before January 1, 2018 shall not be denied due to violations of building standards, or if the unpermitted ADU does not comply with Chapter 155 of the Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code, unless it is found that correcting the violation is necessary to protect the health and safety of the public or occupants of the structure pursuant to Section 17920.3 of the Health and Safety Code. An application for an unpermitted ADU for which a building permit does not exist shall be approved based the version of the applicable Building Standards Code in effect when the residential unit was determined to be constructed for the purposes of issuing a building permit; the appropriate enforcement official may make a determination of the date of construction, and issue a retroactive building permit for that construction. (2) This provision shall only apply if the accessory dwelling unit was built before January 1, 2020 and after July 25, 2020. The City shall delay enforcement of building standards that are not a matter of public health and safety for existing ADUs upon request of the ADU owner, as follows:
(a) ADUs built prior to January 1, 2020 are eligible, or ADUs built on or after January 1, 2020 at a time that the City had a noncompliant ADU ordinance. (b) Until January 1, 2030, the City shall issue a statement along with a notice to correct a violation of any provision of any building standard relating to an ADU that substantially provides as follows:
(i) You have been issued an order to correct violations or abate nuisances relating to your ADU. If you believe that this correction or abatement is not necessary to protect the public health and safety you may file an application with the City Planning Department. If the city determines that enforcement is not required to protect the health and safety, enforcement shall be delayed for a period of five years from the date of the original notice.
*****
Key:

Normal Text = Existing unmodified Code language
Strikethrough Text = Proposed language to be removed from existing Code Underline Text = Proposed language to be added to Code
***** = Existing unmodified Code language not included in exhibit for sake of brevity Code of Ordinances of the City of Santa Fe Springs Chapter 155, Section 155.644.1 JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS is hereby amended as follows:
§ 155.644.1 JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.
(A) Intent. In enacting this section, it is the intent of the city to encourage the provision of junior accessory dwelling units to meet a variety of economic needs within the city and to implement the goals, objectives, and policies of the housing element of the general plan. Junior accessory dwelling units provide housing for extended family members, students, the elderly in-home health care providers, the disabled, and others at below market prices within existing neighborhoods. Homeowners who create junior accessory dwelling units can benefit from added income, and an increased sense of security.

Allowing junior accessory dwelling units in single-family residential zones provides needed additional rental housing. This section provides the requirements for the establishment of junior accessory dwelling units consistent with Cal. Government Code § 65852.22.
(B) Administrative review. All junior accessory dwelling unit applications shall be ministerially approved by the Director of Planning and Development, or his/her designee, and a permit issued within 60 days upon presentation receipt of a completed application to provide a junior accessory dwelling unit if the plans conform to complying with the standards and criteria provided in § 155.644.1(C) and (D)this section. If an application for a junior accessory dwelling unit is denied within those 60 days, the applicant will be provided with a list of defective items and description of how the deficiencies can be remedied. If the application is neither approved nor denied within the 60 days after a complete application is submitted, the application is deemed approved. If the junior accessory dwelling unit is being proposed in conjunction with a new single-family dwelling, the Director may delay acting on the permit application until the city acts on the permit application for the new single-family dwelling. If the applicant requests a delay, The the city shall grant a delay if requested by the applicant and the city’s60-day period will be tolled for the period of the requested delay for consideration will be tolled during that requested delay.
(C) Junior accessory dwelling unit standards. The following standards and criteria shall apply to the creation of a junior accessory dwelling unit:
(1) Number Allowed. A maximum of one junior accessory dwelling unit shall be permitted per residential lot containing an existing or proposed single-family dwelling.

Junior accessory dwelling units do not count towards the density requirements of the general plan or zoning ordinance.
(2) Owner occupancy. The property owner shall occupy either the main singlefamily dwelling or the junior accessory dwelling unit. (3) Tenure. The junior accessory dwelling unit or the main single-family dwelling may be rented, provided the rental term is at least 31 days or more, but the junior accessory dwelling unit shall not be sold or owned separately from the single-family dwelling
(4) Allowable location. The junior accessory dwelling unit must be created within the existing walls of an existing single-family dwelling, which includes an attached garage. (5) Size. The junior accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 500 square feet in size.
(6) Entrance. The junior accessory dwelling unit shall include a separate exterior entrance from the main entrance to the single-family home. An interior entry to the main living area shall be required if the junior accessory dwelling unit shares sanitary facilities with the single-family home. The junior accessory dwelling unit may include a second interior doorway for sound attenuation.
(7) Kitchen required. The junior accessory dwelling unit shall include a food preparation area, requiring and limited to the following components:
(a) A cooking facility with appliancesAn area used for cooking, with kitchen appliance; and
(b) A food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in relation to the size of the junior accessory dwellingwhich do not exceed six feet in length.
(8) Parking. No additional off-street parking is required beyond that required for the main single-family dwelling.
(9) Utility service. A separate water connection or meter, and a separate sewer service connection are not required for a junior accessory dwelling unit. Water and sewer service for the junior accessory dwelling unit is shared with the main single-family dwelling unit.
(10) Applicable codes. The junior accessory dwelling unit shall comply with all applicable building standards and shall be subject to permit and inspection fees to ensure such compliance. Fire sprinklers shall be required if they are required in the existing or proposed single-family residence.
(11) Regulations and connection fees. For the purposes of applying any fire or life protection ordinance or regulation, or providing service water, sewer, or power, including a connection fee, a junior accessory dwelling unit shall not be considered to be a separate or new dwelling unit.
(12) Deed restriction. Prior to obtaining a building permit for the junior accessory dwelling unit, a deed restriction, in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the County Recorder to evidence and give notice of the requirements of this section.
(D) Enforcement. The city shall not require the correction of a legal, nonconforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures that do not present a threat to public health and safety and that are not affect by the construction of the junior accessory dwelling unit in the for approval of a junior accessory dwelling unit.

Attachment C: Planning Commission Resolution 252-2023

CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS
RESOLUTION NO. 252-2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

SANTA FE SPRINGS RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL

APPROVE AND ADOPT ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT TO ENSURE THAT
THE CITY’S ZONING ORDINANCE IS ALIGNED WITH THE STATE’S

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNIT (JADU) STATUTES
WHEREAS, on March 9, 2017, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1084, which updated the City's Zoning Ordinance to comply with the State's statutes in connection with Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADU); and
WHEREAS, in 2021, the City of Santa Fe Springs applied for and was selected by the Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) and the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (CA HCD) to participate in the SCAG 2020/2021 Sustainable Communities Program (SCP) as part of the Regional Early Action Program (REAP) for Advance Accessory Dwelling Unit Implementation; and WHEREAS, one of the project's primary deliverables is the update of the City's ADU and JADU ordinance to align with State Laws and promote ADU and JADU productivity within the City; and
WHEREAS, new State ADU Laws (SB-897 and AB-2221) amending Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 became effective on January 1, 2023, amending the existing requirement for the development of ADUs and JADUs; and WHEREAS, an additional new law (AB 1033) amending Government Code Section 65852.2, which will go into effect on January 1, 2024, eliminates the owner occupancy requirements for ADUs; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.2, if a local ordinance conflicts with state law, state law supersedes the conflicting local ordinance; and WHEREAS, SCAG consultant Woodsong Associates assisted the City with developing a Zone Text Amendment to align with the State ADUs and JADUs statutes; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared a Zone Text Amendment to the City's Zoning Ordinance, as codified in Title 15 of the Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code, which updates Section 155.003 (Definitions), Section 155.644 (Accessory Dwelling Unit), and Section 155.644.1 (Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21080.17, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (State ADU Law); and
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2023, the City of Santa Fe Springs Department of Planning and Development published a legal notice in the Whitter Daily News, a local paper of general circulation, indicating the date and time of the public hearing; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2023, a public hearing notice was also posted in the Santa Fe Springs City Hall window, the City’s Town Center kiosk, and the City’s Library; and
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Fe Springs Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the written and oral staff report, the testimony, written comments, and other materials presented at the public hearing on November 13, 2023; and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2023, the City of Santa Fe Springs Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing and considered public testimony concerning amendments to the text of the City’s Zoning Regulations.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF

THE CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION I: The Planning Commission recommends that the following findings be made by the City Council regarding the Zone Text Amendment:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantial part of this Resolution.

2. The Exhibits attached to this Resolution are each incorporated by reference and made a part of this Resolution.

3. The proposed Zone Text Amendment meets or exceeds the minimum provisions outlined in Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (State ADU Law).

4. The proposed Zone Text Amendment is consistent with the Santa Fe Springs General Plan.

5. That pursuant to California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21080.17, CEQA does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (State ADU Law).

6. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Ordinance No. 1134, amending the text of the City’s Zoning Ordinance.

CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS
ORDINANCE NO. 1134

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA FE

SPRINGS ADOPTING ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT TO ENSURE THAT
THE CITY’S ZONING ORDINANCE IS ALIGNED WITH THE STATE’S

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNIT (JADU) STATUTES
WHEREAS, on March 9, 2017, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1084, which updated the City's Zoning Ordinance to comply with the State's statutes in connection with Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADU); and
WHEREAS, in 2021, the City of Santa Fe Springs applied for and was selected by the Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) and the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (CA HCD) to participate in the SCAG 2020/2021 Sustainable Communities Program (SCP) as part of the Regional Early Action Program (REAP) for Advance Accessory Dwelling Unit Implementation; and WHEREAS, one of the project's primary deliverables is the update of the City's ADU and JADU ordinance to align with State Laws and promote ADU and JADU productivity within the City; and
WHEREAS, new State ADU Laws (SB-897 and AB-2221) amending Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 became effective on January 1, 2023, amending the existing requirements for the development of ADUs and JADUs; and WHEREAS, an additional new law (AB 1033) amending Government Code Section 65852.2, which will go into effect on January 1, 2024, eliminates the owner occupancy requirements for ADUs; and
WHEREAS, according to Government Code Section 65852.2, if a local ordinances conflicts with state law, state law supersedes the conflicting local ordinance; and WHEREAS, SCAG consultant Woodsong Associates assisted the City with developing a Zone Text Amendment to align with the State ADUs and JADUs statutes; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared a Zone Text Amendment to the City's Zoning Ordinance, as codified in Title 15 of the Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code, which updates Section 155.003 (Definitions), Section 155.644 (Accessory Dwelling Unit), and Section 155.644.1 (Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21080.17, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (State ADU Law); and
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2023, the City of Santa Fe Springs Department of Planning and Development published a legal notice in the Whitter Daily News, a local paper of general circulation, indicating the date and time of the public hearing; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2023, a public hearing notice was also posted in the Santa Fe Springs City Hall window, the City’s Town Center kiosk, and the City’s Library; and
WHEREAS, on November 13, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Fe Springs adopted Resolution 252-2023 recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance amending the Zoning Code in relation to ADUs and JADUs; and WHEREAS, on December 4, 2023, the City Council of the City of Santa Fe Springs considered the Zone Text Amendment, the staff report, and all testimony, written and spoken, at a duly noticed public hearing.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA FE SPRINGS DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION I. Findings:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantial part of this Ordinance.

2. The Exhibits attached to this Ordinance are each incorporated by reference and made a part of this Ordinance.

3. The proposed Zone Text Amendment meets or exceeds the minimum provisions outlined in Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (State ADU Law).

4. The proposed Zone Text Amendment is consistent with the Santa Fe Springs General Plan.

5. The Zone Text Amendment meets the requirements as contained in Planning and Zoning Law (Government Code sections 65800-65912).

6. The Zone Text Amendment has been prepared and will be adopted in accordance with the requirements of Planning and Zoning Law (Government Code sections 65853-65860).

SECTION II. The City Council hereby finds with respect to CEQA:

Pursuant to California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21080.17, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to the adoption of an Ordinance by a city or county to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (State ADU Law). The ZTA implements California Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22, as amended, within the City of Santa Fe Springs in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of State ADU/JADU Laws. As such, the proposed ZTA and Ordinance is exempt from CEQA.

SECTION III. Amendments:

1. Code of Ordinances of the City of Santa Fe Springs Chapter 155, Section 155.003 DEFINITIONS is hereby amended as provided in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

2. Code of Ordinances of the City of Santa Fe Springs Chapter 155, Sections 155.644 (Accessory Dwelling Unit) and 155.644.1 (Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit) is hereby amended as provided in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by referenc.

Section IV. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in this Ordinance, or any part thereof, is held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections or portions of this Ordinance or of Chapter 155, or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section V. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City, such posting to be completed not later than fifteen (15) days after passage thereof.

PASSED and ADOPTED this ____ day of ________________________, 2023, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
________________________________
Jay Sarno, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Janet Martinez, CMC, City Clerk
Exhibit A – Definitions Text Amendments
Exhibit B – Accessory Dwelling Unit and Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit Text Amendments
Key:

Normal Text = Existing unmodified Code language
Strikethrough Text = Proposed language to be removed from existing Code Underline Text = Proposed language to be added to Code
***** = Existing unmodified Code language not included in exhibit for sake of brevity Code of Ordinances of the City of Santa Fe Springs Chapter 155, Section 155.003 DEFINITIONS is hereby amended as follows:
§ 155.003 DEFINITIONS.

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU). Either a detached or attached dwelling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing primary residence. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. An ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADU may also be located within an existing or proposed primary dwelling unit. An ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADU also includes the following:
(1) An efficiency unit, as defined in Cal. Health and Safety Code § 17958.1. (2) A manufactured home, as defined in California Health and Safety Code § 18007.A factory-built ADU, such as manufactured homes as defined in California Health and Safety Code § 18007, or in the Code of Federal Regulations governing manufactured homes: Code of Federal Regulations Title 24, Housing and Urban Development, Part 3280, Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, Subsection 3280.2, “Definitions."
(3) A factory-built modular ADU that complies with the standards of Chapter 155.644 (D).

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT, JUNIOR (JADU). A junior accessory dwelling unit is a unit that is no more than 500 square feet in size and contained entirely within a singlefamily residence (1) Is no more than 500 square feet in size;
(2) Is contained entirely within an existing or proposed single-family structure; (3) Has or shares sanitation facilities within the existing or proposed single-familty structure;
(4) Includes an efficiency kitchen.
*****
CARRIAGE HOUSE. An ADU that is located above a detached garage. *****
EFFICIENCY KITCHEN. A kitchen that includes each of the following:
(1) An area used for cooking, with kitchen appliances;
(2) A food preparation counter that is adequate for the size of the unit; and (3) Food storage cabinets that are adequate for the size of the unit. *****
IMPACT FEES. A monetary exaction that is charged by the City to a property owner and/or project applicant in connection with approval of a project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities, public improvements, public services, and community amenities; this does not include fees for processing applications for governmental regulatory actions or approvals or any connection fee or capacity charge charged by a local agency, special district, or water corporation. *****
LIVING AREA. The interior habitable area of a dwelling unit including basements and attics meeting habitable space requirements of the California Building Code with Los Angeles County amendments but not including a garage or any accessory structure. *****
NONCONFORMING ZONING CONDITION. A physical improvement on a property that does not conform with current zoning standards.
*****
OBJECTIVE STANDARDS. Standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal.
*****
PERMIT FEES. A monetary exaction charged to a property owner and/or project applicant in connection with an application for a permit for the reimbursement of expenses incurred during the processing and review of the application, but not fees otherwise classified as impact fees.

PERMITTING AGENCY. Any entity that is involved in the review of a permit and for which there is no substitute, including, but not limited to, applicable planning departments, building departments, fire departments, utilities, and special districts. *****
PROPOSED DWELLING. A dwelling that is the subject of a permit application and that meets the requirements for permitting.
*****
PUBLIC TRANSIT. A location, including, but not limited to, a bus stop or train station, where the public may access buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, run on fixed routes, and are available to the public. *****
TANDEM PARKING, RESIDENTIAL. Two or more automobiles parked on a permitted parking are lined up behind one another.

Key:

Normal Text = Existing unmodified Code language
Strikethrough Text = Proposed language to be removed from existing Code Underline Text = Proposed language to be added to Code
***** = Existing unmodified Code language not included in exhibit for sake of brevity Code of Ordinances of the City of Santa Fe Springs Chapter 155, Section 155.644 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS is hereby amended as follows:
§ 155.644 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.
(A) Intent. In enacting this section, it is the intent of the city to encourage the provision of accessory dwelling units to meet a variety of economic needs within the city and to implement the goals, objectives, and policies of the housing element of the generalplan.

Accessory dwelling units provide housing for extended family members, students, the elderly in-home health care providers, the disabled, and others, additional housing at below market prices within existing neighborhoods. Homeowners who create accessory dwelling units can benefit from added income, and an increased sense of security.

Allowing accessory dwelling units in residential zones provides needed additional rental housing. This section provides the requirements for the establishment of accessory dwelling units consistent with Cal. Government Code § 65852.2. (B) Interpretation. In cases of conflict between this section and any other provision of this title, the provisions of this section shall prevail. To the extent that any provision of this section is in conflict with State law, the mandatory requirement of State law shall control, but only to the extent legally required.
(C)Applications.
(1) Administrative Review. All accessory dwelling unit applications shall be ministerially approved by the Director of Planning and Development, or his/her designee, and a permit issued within 60 days upon presentation receipt of a completed application to build an accessory dwelling unit if the plans conform to the complying with the standards and criteria provided set forth in § 155.644(D) and (E) this section. If an application for accessory dwelling unit is denied within those 60 days, the applicant will be provided with a list of defective items and description of how the deficiencies can be remedied. If the application is neither approved nor denied within the 60 days after a complete application is submitted, the application is deemed approved. If the accessory dwelling unit is being proposed in conjunction with a new single-family dwelling, the Director may delay acting on the accessory dwelling unit permit application until the city acts on the permit application for the new single-family dwelling. If the applicant requests a delay, Tthe city shall grant a delay if requested by the applicant andand the the city’s 60-day period for consideration will be tolled during thatfor the period of the requested delay.
(2) Fees. Applications for an accessory dwelling unit shall be accompanied by an application fee and shall be subject to applicable inspection and permit fees. (D)Accessory dwelling unit standards. The following standards and criteria shall apply to the creation of an accessory dwelling unit:
(1) Allowable zones. The accessory dwelling unit shall be allowed only on a lot or parcel that is zoned for single family residential, multifamily residential or mixed use with an existing or proposed residential dwelling.
(2) Number of ADUs. There shall not be more than one accessory dwelling unit per lot or parcel, except as provided for in § 155.644(F)(1)(a). (a) There shall not be more than one ADU, and one JADU within the walls of the existing or proposed residence, per lot or parcel that is zoned for single family residential use.
(b) On a lot with existing multifamily dwelling structures, at least one unit and up to 25% of the total multifamily dwelling units are allowed within the portions of the existing structure that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, provided that each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings.
(c) On a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling, not more than two detached units, subject to the height limitation set forth in subsection (D)(7), and at least a four-foot side and rear yard setback. The maximum square footage shall comply with the limits set forth in § 155.644(D)(5). The city shall not require any modifications to an existing multifamily dwelling that has a rear or side yard setback of less than four feet if the proposed accessory dwelling unit satisfies the provisions of this subsection. (3) Conformance with zoning and General Plan. An accessory dwelling unit that conforms to the development standards of this section is deemed to be an accessory use and/or structure and will not be considered to exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which it is located and shall be deemed to conform to the zoning and General Plan. (4) Allowable forms. The accessory dwelling unit may be attached to or detached from the primary residential dwelling or located within an existing or proposed singlefamily residence, including a garage, or within an accessory structure. (5) Floor area standards.
(a) The detached or attached accessory dwelling unit with one or less bedroom shall not exceed a total floor area of 850 square feet. (b) The detached or attached accessory dwelling unit with more than one bedroom shall not exceed a total floor area of 1,000 1,200 square feet. (c) If there is an existing primary dwelling, the total floor area of an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 50% of the existing primary dwelling. (dc) The minimum floor area for an accessory dwelling unit shall be 150 square feet.
(6) Setback standards.
(a) The accessory dwelling unit shall comply with the front setback standard applicable to the specific zone in which it is located, unless doing so would prohibit the construction of at least an 850 square foot accessory dwelling unit. The first priority placement shall be in the rear of a property, developed in compliance with the required setbacks. If proposed at the front of a property, the front setback shall be maximized to the extent allowed within these requirements. Notwithstanding any other provision in this section, an accessory dwelling unit that encroaches into the front yard setback shall be limited to a total of eight hundred square feet otherwise modified by this section. (b) The accessory dwelling unit shall be set back no less than four feet from the side and rear property lines.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, no setback shall be required for an existing permitted living area or accessory structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure that is converted to an accessory dwelling unit or to a portion of an accessory dwelling unit. A setback of no more than four feet from the side and rear lot lines shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit that is not converted from an existing structure or a new structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. (7) The accessory dwelling unit shall not be greater than 16 feet in height The height of an accessory dwelling unit shall be as follows:
(a) A detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit shall not be greater than 16 feet in height. (b) A detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21155, shall not be greater than 18 feet in height. Two additional feet in height is allowed to accommodate roof pitch of the accessory dwelling unit to align with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit.
(c) A detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily multistory dwelling shall not be greater than 18 feet in height. (d) For an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling, an accessory dwelling unit shall not be higher than 25 feet or the height of the primary dwelling, whichever is lower.
(e) An accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed two stories. (8) Location. The attached or detached accessory dwelling unit shall be located within, or if outside of the existing walls of the existing or proposed primary residence, preferably to the rear, or to the side of the existing or proposed primaryresidence unless the accessory dwelling unit is being constructed in the exact location and to the same dimensions as an previously existing approved accessory structure, including an attached or detached garage.
(9) Regulating code. The accessory dwelling unit shall comply with all building, safety, fire and health codes, and all other applicable laws and regulations. Accessory dwelling units are not required to provide fire sprinklers if sprinklers are not required for the primary dwelling unit.
(10) Manufacturing ADUs. Manufactured housing, factory-built ADUS, and modular ADUs is are allowed in compliance with the provisions herein and Cal. Health and Safety Code § 18007; however, mobile homes, trailers and recreational vehicles shall not be used as accessory dwelling units.
(11) Parking. In addition to all other required off-street parking, parking requirements for accessory dwelling units shall not exceed one space per unit. Parking may also be located in setback areas in locations determined by the city or through tandem parking, unless specific findings are made that such parking is infeasible based upon specific site or regional topographical or fire and life safety conditions, or that it is not permitted anywhere else in the city. Mechanical parking lifts may also be used for replacement parking.
(12) Replacement parking. When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of or conversion to an accessory dwelling unit, no replacement parking shall be required. Additionally, no parking shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit in any of the following instances:
(a) The accessory dwelling unit is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit.
(b) The accessory dwelling unit is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district.
(c) The accessory dwelling unit is part of the proposed or existing primary residence or an existing permitted accessory structure. (d) When on-street parking permits are required but has not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit.
(e) When there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the accessory dwelling unit.
(f) When a permit application for an accessory dwelling unit is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family dwelling or a new multifamily dwelling on the same lot, provided that the accessory dwelling unit or the parcel satisfies any other criteria listed in this subsection.
(13) Rentals and separate sale of ADUs. The accessory dwelling unit and the primary residential dwelling may be rented concurrently, provided that the term of the rental is at least 31 days or more. , but the accessory dwelling unit shall not be sold or owned separately from the primary dwelling, An accessory dwelling unit may be sold or conveyed separately from the primary residence, only if:
(a) The accessory dwelling unit is sold to a qualified buyer, including persons and families of low or moderate income, as that term is defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, and all of the following apply:
(I) The accessory dwelling unit or the primary dwelling was built or developed by a qualified nonprofit corporation, one that is organized pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that has received a welfare exemption under Section 214.15 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for properties intended to be sold to low-income families who participate in a special no-interest loan program. (II) There is an enforceable restriction on the use of the land pursuant to a recorded contract between the qualified buyer and the qualified nonprofit corporation that satisfies all of the requirements specified in paragraph (10) of subdivision (a) of Section 402.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(III)The property is held pursuant to a recorded tenancy in common agreement that includes all of the following:
(A) The agreement allocates to each qualified buyer an undivided, unequal interest in the property based on the size of the dwelling that each qualified buyer occupies.
(B) A repurchase option that requires the qualified buyer to first offer the qualified nonprofit corporation to buy the accessory dwelling unit or primary dwelling if the buyer desires to sell or convey the property.
(C)A requirement that the qualified buyer occupy the accessory dwelling unit or primary dwelling as the buyer’s principal residence. (D)Affordability restrictions on the sale and conveyance of the accessory dwelling unit or primary dwelling that ensure the accessory dwelling unit and primary dwelling will be preserved for low-income housing for 45 years for owneroccupied housing units and will be sold or resold to a qualified buyer. (E) The tenancy in common agreement shall include all of the following:
(i) Delineation of all areas of the property that are for the exclusive use of a cotenant. Each cotenant shall agree not to claim a right of occupancy to an area delineated for the exclusive use of another cotenant, provided that the latter cotenant’s obligations to each of the other cotenants have been satisfied. (ii) Delineation of each cotenant’s responsibility for the costs of taxes, insurance, utilities, general maintenance and repair, improvements, and any other costs, obligations, or liabilities associated with the property. This delineation shall only be binding on the parties to the agreement, and shall not supersede or obviate the liability, whether joint and several or otherwise, of the parties for any cost, obligation, or liability associated with the property where such liability is otherwise established by law or by agreement with a third party.
(iii) Procedures for dispute resolution among the parties before resorting to legal action.
(IV) A grant deed naming the grantor, grantee, and describing the property interests being transferred shall be recorded in the county in which the property is located.

A Preliminary Change of Ownership Report shall be filed concurrently with this grant deed pursuant to Section 480.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. (V) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (f) of Section 65852.2, if requested by a utility providing service to the primary residence, the accessory dwelling unit has a separate water, sewer, or electrical connection to that utility. (14) Rentals and tenure. The accessory dwelling unit and the primary residential dwelling may be rented concurrently provided that the term of the rental is at least 31 days or more, but the accessory dwelling unit shall not be sold or owned separately from the primary dwelling, unless the owner is another governmental agency, land trust, housing organization, or qualified non-profit.
(15) Utility connection or capacity charges. Accessory dwelling units shall not be considered new residential uses for the purposes of calculating local agency connection fees or capacity charges for utilities, including water and sewer service. (a) For attached units or units located within the living area of proposed or the existing single-family dwelling and meeting the definition of § 155.644(F)(1)(a) below, the city shall not require the applicant to install a new or separate utility connection between the accessory dwelling unit and the utility or impose a related connection fee or capacity charge. Such requirements and charges may be imposed when the accessory dwelling unit is being constructed in connection with a proposed new single-family residential dwelling.
(b) For all other accessory dwelling units other than those described in § 155.644(D)(15)(a) above, the city may require a new or separate utility connection directly between the accessory dwelling unit and the utility. The connection fee or capacity charge shall be proportionate in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. burden of the proposed accessory dwelling unit upon the water or sewer system based upon either its size or the number of its plumbing fixtures, and may not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the water or sewer service.
(16) Impact fees.
(a) No impact fee shall be imposed on any accessory dwelling unit less than 750 square feet in size, except for impact fees used to fund school, which shall not be imposed on any ADU of or less than 500 square feet in size. (b) For accessory dwelling units 750 square feet or greater, impact fees shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling. (c) All applicable public service and recreation impact fees shall be paid prior to occupancy in accordance with Cal. Government Code §§ 66000 et seq. and 66012 et seq.
(d) For purposes of this section, "impact fee" shall have the same meaning as set forth in Cal. Government Code § 65852.2(f).
(1716) Prior approvals. The provisions of this section shall not apply to any accessory dwelling units for which the city issued conditional use permits prior to the effective date of this section.
(18) Prior to obtaining a building permit for the accessory dwelling unit, a deed restriction, in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the County Recorder to evidence and give notice of the requirements of this section. (E) Design standards.
(1) The accessory dwelling unit shall be designed to be architecturally compatible with the primary dwelling. A site plan, elevations and floor plan depicting said architectural compatibility shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Development for ministerial review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. A site plan, elevations and floor plan depicting the location of the ADU in relation to the primary dwelling shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Development for ministerial review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. (2) When feasible, windows facing an adjoining residential property shall be designed to protect the privacy of neighbors. If window placement does not protect privacy, then fencing or landscaping might be used to provide screening. Windows and doors of an ADU shall not have a direct line of sight to an adjoining residential property.

Fencing, landscaping, or privacy glass may be used to provide screening and prevent a direct line of sight. Windows and glass doors that face an adjoining property and are within fifteen (15) feet of a property line that is not a right-of-way line must either be (for windows) clerestory with the bottom of the glass at least six (6) feet above the finished floor, or (for windows and for doors) utilize frosted or obscure glass. (3) An accessory dwelling unit shall have a separate exterior entrance from the primary dwelling unit.
(4) To the maximum extent feasible, the accessory dwelling unit shall not alter the appearance of the primary single-family dwelling unit.
(5) When feasible, no more than one exterior entrance on the front or on any streetfacing side of the primary dwelling unit and accessory dwelling unit combined. (64) No exterior stairway shall be located on the front or on any street-facing side of the accessory dwelling unit.
(F) Mandatory ADU application approvals.
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the city shall ministerially approve an application for any of the following accessory dwelling units within a residential or mixed-use zone:
(a) A junior or accessory dwelling unit within the existing or proposed space of a single-family dwelling or accessory structure subject to the following requirements:

1. An expansion of up to 150 square feet shall be allowed in an accessory structure that is converted to an ADU solely for the purposes of accommodating ingress and egress.

2. The junior or accessory dwelling unit shall have exterior access separate from the existing or proposed single-family dwelling.

3. The side and rear setbacks shall be sufficient for fire and building and safety.

4. If the unit is a junior accessory dwelling unit, it shall comply with the requirements of § 155.644.1 below.
(b) One detached or attached accessory dwelling unit subject to the following requirements:

1. The accessory dwelling unit shall be set back no less than four feet from the side and rear property line.

2. The accessory dwelling unit shall be on a lot or parcel with an existing or proposed single-family dwelling.

3. The accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 800 square feet in size.

4. The accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 16 feet in height.

5. A junior accessory dwelling unit may be developed with this type of detached accessory dwelling unit, it shall comply with all requirements of § 155.644.1 below.
(c) On a lot with a multifamily dwelling structure, up to 25% of the total multifamily dwelling units, but no less than one unit, shall be allowed within the portions of the existing structure that are not used as livable space, including, but no limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, provided that each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings.
(d) On a lot with a multifamily dwelling structure, up to two detached units, provided that neither unit is greater than 16 feet in height, is provided with at least a four foot side and rear yard setback. The maximum square footage shall comply with the limits set forth in § 155.644(D)(5).
(2) For those accessory dwelling units which require mandatory approval, the city shall not require the correction of legal, nonconforming zoning conditions. (1) A permit application for an ADU or a JADU shall be considered and approved ministerially without discretionary review or a hearing. The City and any associated permitting agencies including, but not limited to, applicable planning departments, building departments, consultants or contractors working as agents of the City, utilities, and special districts, shall approve and issue a building permit or deny the application to create or serve an ADU or a JADU within 60 calendar days after receiving a completed application if there is an existing primary dwelling on the lot and if it meets the minimum ADU and/or JADU standards of this chapter.
(a) If the City and any associated permitting agencies has not approved or denied the completed application within 60 days, the application shall be deemed approved and a building permit issued for its construction.
(b) If the City or any associated permitting agencies denies an application for an ADU or JADU pursuant to paragraph (a), the City and any associated permitting agencies shall, within the 60 day time period, transmit to the applicant a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied. (c) If the permit application to create an ADU or a JADU is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family or multifamily dwelling on the lot, the City and any associated permitting agencies may delay approving or denying the permit application for the ADU or JADU until the City approves or denies the permit application to create the new dwelling, but the application to create the ADU or JADU shall be considered without discretionary review or hearing.
(d) If the applicant requests a delay, the 60-day time period shall be paused for the period of the delay. If the permit application is returned to the applicant with a list of corrections requested to comply with applicable codes and regulations, any accounting of the 60-day time period shall be paused for the period of time until the applicant resubmits a corrected application. (e) A demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU shall be reviewed with the application for the ADU, and a building permit for the ADU shall be issued at the same time as the demolition permit; the applicant shall not be required to provide written notice or post a placard for the demolition of a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU.
(2) The City shall not require the correction of existing legal, nonconforming zoning conditions prior to issuing a permit for an ADU.
(G) Enforcement. Until January 1, 2030, the city shall issue a statement along with a notice to correct a violation of any provision of any building standard relating to an accessory dwelling unit that substantially provides as follows: Existing Units. (1) You have been issued an order to correct violations or abate nuisances relating to your accessory dwelling unit. If you believe that this correction or abatement is not necessary to protect the public health and safety you may file an application with the City Planning Department. If the city determines that enforcement is not required to protect the health and safety, enforcement shall be delayed for a period of five years from the date of the original notice. Existing ADUs that have not been approved by the City are required to obtain approval in order to be considered a lawful use. An application for an unpermitted ADU that was constructed before January 1, 2018 shall not be denied due to violations of building standards, or if the unpermitted ADU does not comply with Chapter 155 of the Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code, unless it is found that correcting the violation is necessary to protect the health and safety of the public or occupants of the structure pursuant to Section 17920.3 of the Health and Safety Code. An application for an unpermitted ADU for which a building permit does not exist shall be approved based the version of the applicable Building Standards Code in effect when the residential unit was determined to be constructed for the purposes of issuing a building permit; the appropriate enforcement official may make a determination of the date of construction, and issue a retroactive building permit for that construction. (2) This provision shall only apply if the accessory dwelling unit was built before January 1, 2020 and after July 25, 2020. The City shall delay enforcement of building standards that are not a matter of public health and safety for existing ADUs upon request of the ADU owner, as follows:
(a) ADUs built prior to January 1, 2020 are eligible, or ADUs built on or after January 1, 2020 at a time that the City had a noncompliant ADU ordinance. (b) Until January 1, 2030, the City shall issue a statement along with a notice to correct a violation of any provision of any building standard relating to an ADU that substantially provides as follows:
(i) You have been issued an order to correct violations or abate nuisances relating to your ADU. If you believe that this correction or abatement is not necessary to protect the public health and safety you may file an application with the City Planning Department. If the city determines that enforcement is not required to protect the health and safety, enforcement shall be delayed for a period of five years from the date of the original notice.
*****
Key:

Normal Text = Existing unmodified Code language
Strikethrough Text = Proposed language to be removed from existing Code Underline Text = Proposed language to be added to Code
***** = Existing unmodified Code language not included in exhibit for sake of brevity Code of Ordinances of the City of Santa Fe Springs Chapter 155, Section 155.644.1 JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS is hereby amended as follows:
§ 155.644.1 JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.
(A) Intent. In enacting this section, it is the intent of the city to encourage the provision of junior accessory dwelling units to meet a variety of economic needs within the city and to implement the goals, objectives, and policies of the housing element of the general plan. Junior accessory dwelling units provide housing for extended family members, students, the elderly in-home health care providers, the disabled, and others at below market prices within existing neighborhoods. Homeowners who create junior accessory dwelling units can benefit from added income, and an increased sense of security.

Allowing junior accessory dwelling units in single-family residential zones provides needed additional rental housing. This section provides the requirements for the establishment of junior accessory dwelling units consistent with Cal. Government Code § 65852.22.
(B) Administrative review. All junior accessory dwelling unit applications shall be ministerially approved by the Director of Planning and Development, or his/her designee, and a permit issued within 60 days upon presentation receipt of a completed application to provide a junior accessory dwelling unit if the plans conform to complying with the standards and criteria provided in § 155.644.1(C) and (D)this section. If an application for a junior accessory dwelling unit is denied within those 60 days, the applicant will be provided with a list of defective items and description of how the deficiencies can be remedied. If the application is neither approved nor denied within the 60 days after a complete application is submitted, the application is deemed approved. If the junior accessory dwelling unit is being proposed in conjunction with a new single-family dwelling, the Director may delay acting on the permit application until the city acts on the permit application for the new single-family dwelling. If the applicant requests a delay, The the city shall grant a delay if requested by the applicant and the city’s60-day period will be tolled for the period of the requested delay for consideration will be tolled during that requested delay.
(C)Junior accessory dwelling unit standards. The following standards and criteria shall apply to the creation of a junior accessory dwelling unit:
(1) Number Allowed. A maximum of one junior accessory dwelling unit shall be permitted per residential lot containing an existing or proposed single-family dwelling.

Junior accessory dwelling units do not count towards the density requirements of the general plan or zoning ordinance.
(2) Owner occupancy. The property owner shall occupy either the main singlefamily dwelling or the junior accessory dwelling unit. (3) Tenure. The junior accessory dwelling unit or the main single-family dwelling may be rented, provided the rental term is at least 31 days or more, but the junior accessory dwelling unit shall not be sold or owned separately from the single-family dwelling
(4) Allowable location. The junior accessory dwelling unit must be created within the existing walls of an existing single-family dwelling, which includes an attached garage. (5) Size. The junior accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 500 square feet in size.
(6) Entrance. The junior accessory dwelling unit shall include a separate exterior entrance from the main entrance to the single-family home. An interior entry to the main living area shall be required if the junior accessory dwelling unit shares sanitary facilities with the single-family home. The junior accessory dwelling unit may include a second interior doorway for sound attenuation.
(7) Kitchen required. The junior accessory dwelling unit shall include a food preparation area, requiring and limited to the following components:
(a) A cooking facility with appliancesAn area used for cooking, with kitchen appliance; and
(b) A food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in relation to the size of the junior accessory dwellingwhich do not exceed six feet in length.
(8) Parking. No additional off-street parking is required beyond that required for the main single-family dwelling.
(9) Utility service. A separate water connection or meter, and a separate sewer service connection are not required for a junior accessory dwelling unit. Water and sewer service for the junior accessory dwelling unit is shared with the main single-family dwelling unit.
(10) Applicable codes. The junior accessory dwelling unit shall comply with all applicable building standards and shall be subject to permit and inspection fees to ensure such compliance. Fire sprinklers shall be required if they are required in the existing or proposed single-family residence.
(11) Regulations and connection fees. For the purposes of applying any fire or life protection ordinance or regulation, or providing service water, sewer, or power, including a connection fee, a junior accessory dwelling unit shall not be considered to be a separate or new dwelling unit.
(12) Deed restriction. Prior to obtaining a building permit for the junior accessory dwelling unit, a deed restriction, in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the County Recorder to evidence and give notice of the requirements of this section.
(D)Enforcement. The city shall not require the correction of a legal, nonconforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures that do not present a threat to public health and safety and that are not affect by the construction of the junior accessory dwelling unit in the for approval of a junior accessory dwelling unit.

ITEM # 6

CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: René Bobadilla, P.E., City Manager
BY: Wayne M. Morrell, Director of Planning
Alejandro De Loera, AICP, Contract Planner
SUBJECT: A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DECISION TO APPROVE ZONE DETERMINATION
CASE NO. 2023-01: A REQUEST TO DETERMINE THAT A BATTERY

ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM USE WITH DIRECT CONNECTION TO A

PUBLIC UTILITY GRID IS A SIMILAR AND COMPATIBLE USE WITH

OTHER SIMILARLY PRINCIPALLY PERMITTED USES LISTED IN THE M-2, HEAVY MANUFACTURING, ZONE; AND ADOPT A NOTICE OF
EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA SECTION 15061(B)(3) (COMMON SENSE

EXEMPTION)
DATE: January 11, 2024
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Open the public hearing, receive public testimony from anyone in the audience or on Zoom wishing to speak; and
2) Consider the information presented in the written and oral staff reports, in combination with the November 13, 2023 Planning Commission staff report and summary, which collectively provides the necessary background and context; and 3) Deny the appeal by Bridgeland Resources LLC; and
4) Find and determine that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) and;
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2024 Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to approve Zone Determination Case No. 2023-01

Page 2 of 9 ends

5) Adopt City Council Resolution No. 9892 , which incorporates the City Council’s findings and actions regarding the matter, which include to ratify the Planning Commission’s decision and to approve Zone Determination Case No. 2023-01 determining that a battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid is similar to and compatible with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone and will not be inconsistent with the purpose of the M-2 Zone; and
6) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

FISCAL IMPACT
N/A

BACKGROUND
On November 13, 2023, after receiving the written and oral staff reports and considering the public testimony, the Planning Commission took action to approve Zone Determination Case No. 2023-01 (ZD 2023-01). This determination concluded that a battery energy storage system use, with direct connection to a public utility grid, is similar to and compatible with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone and will not be inconsistent with the purpose of the M-2 Zone.

Additionally, the Planning Commission determined that ZD 2023-01 was exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under the CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(B)(3)(Common Sense Exemption). The findings and actions of the Planning Commission are incorporated within Resolution No. 250-2023, which passed and was adopted with a 3-2 vote.

On November 21, 2023, in accordance with Section 155.865 of the Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code, the City Clerk’s office received a formal appeal from Bridgeland Resources LLC, represented by the law firm Elkins Kalt, regarding the Planning Commission’s decision to approve ZD 2023-01 and adopt the related CEQA determination. The appeal outlined the reasons why the appellant is in opposition to the Planning Commission’s approval of ZD 2023-01 and the related CEQA Determination (see Attachment D).

The subject appeal was noticed in the Whittier Daily News on December 26, 2023 in anticipation of presenting the matter to the City Council at the adjourned meeting on Thursday, January 11, 2024. Legal notice of the public hearing was also posted at Santa Fe Springs City Hall, the City Library and City’s Town Center Kiosk, and sent to the appellant.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2024 Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to approve Zone Determination Case No. 2023-01

Page 3 of 9 ends

To assist the City Council in its deliberation, this report includes the city’s response to comments presented by the appellant. Since the subject appeal was publicly noticed, it is recommended that the City Council receive comments from any members of the public wishing to speak on the matter and subsequently take action.

November 13, 2023 Planning Commission Public Hearing Summary Project Planner, Alejandro De Loera delivered an oral presentation to the Planning Commission regarding the Zone Determination. De Loera presented staff’s recommendation to approve the Zone Determination and determine that the project be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The Planning Commission proceeded to open public comment.

Jackson McNeil of Elkins Kalt, representing Bridgeland Resources LLC, stated concerns about staff’s recommendation to liken battery energy storage system uses to electrical distribution substation uses. McNeil expressed concern about the size of the battery energy storage systems and the scale of potential future developments. McNeil stated that there are safety risks that are unique to batteries that are not present within a typical substation. McNeil acknowledged other jurisdiction in Southern California that have made a similar determination to liken battery energy storage uses to substations and then cited examples of cities in New York and Tennessee that have banned or put a moratorium on the use. McNeil suggested that the Planning Commission deny the Zone Determination.

Justin Trujillo of Elkins Kalt, representing Bridgeland Resources LLC, disagreed with the staff’s recommendation to find the Zone Determination exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Trujillo stated that the CEQA Common Sense Exemption should not apply because the Planning Commission would not be interpreting the Zoning Code, but rather making a discretionary action to allow or not allow battery energy storage system uses, which would have a foreseeable impact on the environment.

Justin stated battery energy storage systems uses are a safety risk citing that the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has created additional guidelines and regulation for energy storage uses that are not found within their regulations for a substation.

Ernest Guadiana of Elkins Kalt, representing Bridgeland Resources LLC noted that there had been 21 letters in support of denying the Zone Determination, from residents of the Heritage Springs community. Guidiana stated that by approving the Zone Determination, that the Planning Commission would effectively be approving a prospective project site by the applicant and other potential projects, without further discretionary review.

Guidiana questioned the benefits of battery energy storage system uses to the city.

Guidiana stated that the property owner of the prospective project site would not be affected by the determination, since there are other uses that could be permitted on the CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2024 Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to approve Zone Determination Case No. 2023-01

Page 4 of 9 ends

site. Guidiana then requested that the Planning Commission deny the Zone Determination.

Phillip Bachich of Reed Smith, representing the applicant, GridStor, stated that the benefits to the City include being a contributor to the of development green energy projects and California’s goal in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Babich stated that Bridgeland’s safety concerns were not as extreme as they were portraying.

Babich cites the Valley Vista battery energy storage system fire that Bridgeland had previously referenced in a comment letter as an example of the system properly utilizing its built in safety measures to contain the fire within the individual units, with no injuries.

Babich stated that several City departments, including the Planning, Fire and Building Departments would need to review and approve any future projects.

The Planning Commission then closed the public hearing.

Kristi Smith of the City Attorney’s office reminded the Planning Commission that it was not reviewing a specific project or location, but rather making an interpretation of the Zoning Code and as such staff’s recommended CEQA exemption is appropriate.

Commissioner John Mora expressed concern about bringing a potential safety risk to the City. Mora stated that he acknowledges that clean energy is important for the future, but that such clean energy projects should be located away from people.

The Planning Commission then took action to approve the Zone Determination and find the project exempt from CEQA, according to staff’s recommendation by a vote of 3-2 in favor of approving the Zone Determination.

ANALYSIS
N/A

ENVIRONMENTAL
The Zone Determination is an activity not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under the CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) as it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Specifically, the Zone Determination will fall under the exemption provided by Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines. The Common Sense Exemption affirms that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. If it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question will have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. A zone determination that a battery energy storage system with a direct connection to a public utility grid is a similar and compatible use with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone will not have a CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2024 Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to approve Zone Determination Case No. 2023-01

Page 5 of 9 ends

significant effect on the environment. This determination is solely an interpretation of the Zoning Code and lacks the site specificity or detailed aspects of any future project for analysis. No project is being approved with the zoning determination. Therefore, with certainty, this Zone Determination cannot have a significant effect on the environment.

Any proposed projects meeting the criteria of a battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid will undergo individual CEQA review based on the site and components of that particular project. Any analysis for a potential project at this stage would be speculative as to the location, size, specific components, etc. such that a meaningful environmental evaluation as to a project would not occur.

DISCUSSION
The requested appeal identifies five (5) key areas of concern, which can be found in further detail in the appeal letter. The five points have been listed below with staff responses indicated beneath each point:

1. Staff has indicated battery storage uses would be allowed by right without a development plan or any discretionary review.

Response: Battery energy storage system uses with a direct connection to a public utility grid are being likened to the “electrical distribution substation” use listed in the Zoning Ordinance, which is principally permitted in the M-2 Zone. Consequently, if battery energy storage system uses were deemed analogous to other principally permitted uses within the M-2 zone, they would be allowed by right. However, any future developments proposed under this use would still be required to go through the City’s plan check process. This process includes comprehensive reviews from the City’s Planning, Building, Fire, and Engineering Departments, along with approval from the California Public Utilities Commission.

It is worth noting that various jurisdictions within Los Angeles County, including the County of Los Angeles and the City of Lancaster, allow battery energy storage system projects by-right in Industrial zones. These projects require only a ministerial (nondiscretionary) site plan review, which aligns with the recent determination made by the City’s Planning Commission.

2. Battery Storage Facilities are not similar to electric distribution substations.

Response: The proposed battery energy storage system use shares substantial similarities with a typical electrical distribution substation. These similarities are based on the following features and operations:

1. Receiving transmission of electricity from transmission towers; and

2. Distributing received electricity into a public utility grid; and CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2024 Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to approve Zone Determination Case No. 2023-01

Page 6 of 9 ends

3. Require on-site supplemental equipment for operational control (i.e. circuit breakers, disconnects, safety systems, etc.); and

4. Being equipped with advanced safety features to prevent and mitigate high voltage electricity risks; and

5. Operating as unmanned and unattended operations, with the exception of occasional maintenance.

A battery energy storage system necessitates connection to electrical transmission lines for energy and subsequent distribution back into a public utility grid. This process is identical to that of a typical electric substation, with the exception that the received energy may also be stored temporarily in batteries before redistribution into the public utility grid.

Moreover, the emergence of energy storage projects in California is tied to an energy storage mandate outlined in Assembly Bill 2868. This mandate compelled certain electricity providers, including Southern California Edison, to construct energy storage projects to support their substations and provide clean, renewable energy to consumers.

These battery storage systems serve as a modern extension to substations and contribute to the overall electrical grid.

The Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning prepared and published a memorandum titled “Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance Interpretation No. 2021-03 – Battery Electric Storage Systems,” dated October 18, 2021. Within this memorandum, it stated that, for the land use purposes, battery energy storage systems are most akin to electric distribution substations – a conclusion consistent with the determination made in ZD 2023-01.

3. At a minimum, battery storage uses should require a Conditional Use Permit.

Response: Reiterating the points made earlier in items 1 and 2, a battery energy storage use with a direct connection to a public utility grid aligns with the classification of an “electrical distribution substation” as listed in the City’s Zoning Ordinance. This classification falls under the principal permitted uses in the M-2 Zone. The use demonstrates similarity and compatibility to other principal permitted uses in the M-2 zone; therefore, it would not be required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) or any further discretionary approval.

However, it is important to note that any proposed development involving this use must comply with all requirements set by the City’s Planning, Building, Fire, and Engineering Departments. Additionally, it requires approval from the California Public Utilities Commission.

4. The community opposes the battery storage projects.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2024 Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to approve Zone Determination Case No. 2023-01

Page 7 of 9 ends

Response: Staff received 21 signed petition letters from residents of the nearby Villages at Heritage Springs, all sharing identical content emphasizing safety concerns associated with battery energy storage projects. While acknowledging the inherent risks involved in battery technologies and the transmission of high-voltage electricity, it is crucial to highlight the rigorous safety measures mandated for a battery energy storage system before it becomes operational.

Outlined below are some key safety reviews that are standard practice:
 Each battery must be thoroughly tested and certified before deployment; and  Approval from the California Public Utilities Commission is mandatory for any storage project connected to the grid; and
 The local electrical provider’s endorsement and approval is necessary to connect the project to the grid; and
 Comprehensive reviews by City Staff, including Planning, Building Fire, and Engineering departments, are requisite for project approval.

The safety technology encompassing battery energy storage systems is continually advancing, particularly in addressing the risks associated with lithium-ion batteries. These safety measures primarily focus on fire prevention and mitigation, particularly in cases of thermal runaway. Battery energy storage systems are meticulously monitored down to the level of individual battery cells. If any irregular behavior is detected, the system is designed to automatically disconnect the affected battery from the system and pass an inspection before reconnection. Additionally, in the unlikely event of a fire risk, entire sections of battery storage units can be deactivated to prevent further spread.

Moreover, battery energy storage systems are equipped with standard fire prevention and suppression mechanisms within every battery storage unit. For example, each unit is equipped with air conditioning to regulate temperatures, while the enclosure structures themselves are engineered to contain any potential fires that might occur within the individual unit. The built-in fire suppression systems within each unit means that even in the rare event of isolated fires, they can typically be effectively contained within a single battery storage unit.

The attached Planning Commission staff report further details the standard safety protocols and precautions that would need to be adhered to before any battery energy storage project may operate.

In addition to these standard protocols, GridStor LLC intends to partner with the City’s Fire Department to provide specialized training to first responders as they have done for other agencies where their battery energy storage systems have been installed. The training aims to educate first responders on appropriate procedures during battery energy storage system emergencies, including fire or thermal events mitigation.

5. The project violates the California Environmental Quality Act.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2024 Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to approve Zone Determination Case No. 2023-01

Page 8 of 9 ends

Response: A zone determination that a battery energy storage system with direct connection to a public utility grid is a similar and compatible use with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone, will not significantly impact the environment. This determination solely involves interpreting the Zoning Ordinance and is not site specific to any site, nor does it include details of any future projects for analysis. Further, no project is being approved with this zoning determination. Therefore, ZD 2023-01, with certainty, cannot have a significant effect on the environment.

Any proposed projects meeting the criteria of a battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid will be individually subject to CEQA review concerning the specific site and components of that particular project. Any analysis for a potential project would be speculative as to the location, size, specific components, etc. such that the any potential project would not be well defined thus preventing a meaningful environmental evaluation.

Please note that further details on each of these points can be found in the Staff’s report and presentation to the Planning Commission (Attachments B and C).

SUMMARY
Public Notification
This matter was set for a Public Hearing in accordance with the requirements of Sections 65090 through 65096 of the State Planning, Zoning, and Development Laws and the requirements of Sections 155.861 through 155.862 and 155.864 through 155.866 of the City’s Municipal Code.

The subject appeal was published in a newspaper of general circulation (Whittier Daily News) on December 26, 2023 in anticipation of presenting the matter to the City Council at its adjourned meeting on Thursday, January 11, 2024. In addition, legal notice of the public hearing was also posted at Santa Fe Springs City Hall, the City Library and City’s Town Center Kiosk as required by the State Zoning and Development Laws and by the City’s Zoning Ordinance. The appellant was also sent notice of this public hearing. As of the date of this report, no inquiries regarding the appeal has been received by staff.

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Attachment A – Planning Commission Agenda – November 13, 2023 B. Attachment B – Planning Commission Staff Report with Attachments C. Attachment C – Staff PowerPoint Presentation to the Planning Commission D. Attachment D – Appeal Letter from Bridgeland Resources LLC E. Attachment E – November 21st E-mail from Elkins Kalt to City Clerk and Planning Staff F. Attachment F – City Council Resolution No. 9892
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2024 Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to approve Zone Determination Case No. 2023-01

Page 9 of 9 ends

ITEM STATUS:

APPROVED:

DENIED:

TABLED:

DIRECTION GIVEN:

CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS

REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2023
AT 6:00 P.M.

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11710 TELEGRAPH ROAD
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670

PLANNING COMMISSION
Francis Carbajal, Chairperson
David Ayala, Vice Chairperson
Joseph Flores, Commissioner
Gabriel Jimenez, Commissioner
John Mora, Commissioner

PLANNING DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY
Wayne M. Morrell Kristi J. Smith

CITY STAFF
Assistant Director of Planning Cuong Nguyen
Associate Planner Vince Velasco
Associate Planner Jimmy Wong
Assistant Planner Claudia Jimenez
Planning Intern Rudy Lopez
Planning Intern Pablo Castilla
Planning Consultant Laurel Reimer
Planning Consultant Alejandro De Loera
Planning Secretary Teresa Cavallo
November 13, 2023: Planning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 8

NOTICES
Public Comment: The public is encouraged to address Planning Commission on any matter listed on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the
Planning Commission, please use the "Raise Hand" function via Zoom once the Chairperson opens Public Comment during the meeting. You may also submit comments in writing by sending them to
the Planning Secretary's Office at
[email protected]. All written comments received by 12:00 p.m. the day of the Planning Commission Meeting will be distributed to the Planning Commission and made a part of the official record of the meeting. Written comments will not
be read at the meeting, only the name of
the person submitting the comment will
be announced.

Americans with Disabilities Act: In
compliance with the ADA, if you need
special assistance to participate in a City
meeting or other services offered by this
City, please contact the Planning Secretary’s Office. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time
when services are needed will assist the
City staff in assuring that reasonable
arrangements can be made to provide
accessibility to the meeting or service.

SB 1439: Effective January 1, 2023 Planning Commission Members are subject to SB 1439 and cannot participate
in certain decisions for a year after accepting campaign contributions of more than $250 from an interested
person. The Planning Commission would
need to disclose the donation and abstain
from voting.

Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act,
no action may be taken on a matter
unless it is listed on the agenda, or
unless certain emergency or special
circumstances exist. The Planning Commission may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future
Planning Commission meeting.

Please Note: Staff reports, and supplemental attachments, are available for inspection at the office of the Planning Secretary, City Hall, 11710 E. Telegraph Road during regular business hours 7:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m., Monday-Thursday and every other Friday. Telephone: (562) 868-0511.

You may attend the Planning Commission meeting telephonically or electronically using the following means:

Electronically using Zoom: Go to Zoom.us and click on “Join A Meeting” or use the following link:
https://zoom.us/j/558333944?pwd=b0FqbkV2aDZneVRnQ3BjYU12SmJlQT09 Zoom Meeting ID: 558 333 944 Password: 554545
Telephonically: Dial: 888-475-4499 Meeting ID: 558 333 944 November 13, 2023: Planning Commission Meeting Page 3 of 8

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA AND AGENDA ITEMS
At this time, the general public may address the Planning Commission on both non-agenda and agenda items. Please be aware that the maximum time allotted for members of the public to speak shall not exceed three (3) minutes per speaker. State Law prohibits the Planning Commission from taking action or entertaining extended discussion on a topic not listed on the agenda. Please show courtesy to others and direct all of your comments to the Chairperson.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

PUBLIC HEARING

1. PUBLIC HEARING (Continued from September 11, 2023)
ZONE DETERMINATION (“ZD”) CASE NO. 2023-01 – TO DETERMINE THAT A

BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM WITH DIRECT CONNECTION TO A

PUBLIC UTILITY GRID IS A SIMILAR AND COMPATIBLE USE WITH OTHER

SIMILARLY PRINCIPALLY PERMITTED USES LISTED IN THE M-L, LIMITED

MANUFACTURING, ZONE, AND ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA SECTION 15061(B)(3) (COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION). (GRIDSTOR LLC) RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission:
1) Continue with the Public Hearing and receive the written and oral staff report and any comments from the public regarding ZD Case No. 2023-01, related Environmental Exemption, and thereafter, close the Public Hearing; and 2) Find and determine that a battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid is similar to and compatible with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone and will not be inconsistent with the purpose of the M-2 Zone; and 3) Find and determine that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption); and
4) Approve ZD Case No. 2023-01, determining that a battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid is similar to and compatible with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone and will not be inconsistent with the purpose of the M-2 Zone; and November 13, 2023: Planning Commission Meeting Page 4 of 8 5) Adopt Resolution No. 250-2023, which incorporates the Planning Commission’s findings and actions regarding the matter; and
6) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

2. PUBLIC HEARING
ALCOHOL SALES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 86 AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 251-2023: A REQUEST TO ALLOW THE OPERATION AND

MAINTENANCE OF THE STORAGE, WHOLESALE SALES, AND DISTRIBUTION OF ALCOHOL BEVERAGES.

RECOMMENDATION(S): That the Planning Commission:
1) Open the Public Hearing and receive the written and oral report and any comments from the public regarding Alcohol Sales Conditional Use Permit (ASCUP) Case No. 86, and thereafter, close the Public Hearing; and 2) Find that the applicant’s ASCUP request meets the criteria set forth in §§155.628 and 155.716 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, for the granting of a Conditional Use Permit; and
3) Find and determine that pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facility) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the project Categorically Exempt; and
4) Recommend to the City Council the approval of Alcohol Sales Conditional Use Permit Case No. 86 subject to the conditions of approval as contained within Resolution No. 251-2023; and
5) Adopt Resolution No. 251-2023, which incorporates the Planning Commission’s findings and actions regarding this matter.

3. PUBLIC HEARING

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED ZONE TEXT AMENDMENTS TO ENSURE THAT THE CITY’S ZONING ORDINANCE IS ALIGNED WITH THE STATE’S ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (JADU) STATUTES.

RECOMMENDATION(S): That the Planning Commission:
1) Open the Public Hearing and receive the written and oral staff report and any comments from the public regarding the proposed zone text amendments related to ADU and JADU regulations; and
2) Find and determine that the proposed zone text amendments are consistent with the goals, policies, and program of the City’s General Plan; and November 13, 2023: Planning Commission Meeting Page 5 of 8 3) Find and determine that the proposed zone text amendments are consistent with the State’s ADU and JADU regulations; and
4) Find and determine that this Project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 21080.17 which provides an exemption for the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the Government Code (the state ADU law); and
5) Adopt Resolution No. 252-2023, which incorporates the Planning Commission’s findings and actions regarding this matter; and
6) Recommend that the City Council approve and adopt Ordinance No. 1134 to effectuate the proposed amendments to the text of the City’s Zoning Ordinance; and
7) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

OLD BUSINESS

4. PARKWAY TREE REMOVAL APPEAL DECISION - RESIDENT REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF PARKWAY TREE AT 10318 HARVEST AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission:
1) Reaffirm the decision of the Director of Public Works to deny the request by the property owner to have the City remove the parkway tree in front of 10318 Harvest Avenue; and
2) Deny the property owner at 10318 Harvest Avenue a permit to remove the parkway tree at his or her own expense.

CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine. Any items a Planning Commissioner wishes to discuss should be designated at this time. All other items may be approved in a single motion. Such approval will also waive the reading of any ordinance.

5. COMPLIANCE REVIEW REPORT FOR ALCOHOL SALES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 31 – FANTIS FOODS CALIFORNIA, INC.

RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission:
1) That the Planning Commission, based on staff’s findings provided within this report, find that the subject use is in compliance with all of the conditions of approval set forth in the initial approval of Alcohol Sales Conditional Use Permit Case No. 31; and
November 13, 2023: Planning Commission Meeting Page 6 of 8 2) Request that this matter be brought back before November 13, 2028, for another compliance review report. The Planning Commission shall note that this matter may be brought back to the Commission at any time should the applicant violate any conditions of approval or any City Codes, or should there be a need to modify, add, or remove a condition of approval.

6. COMPLIANCE REVIEW REPORT FOR ALCOHOL SALES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 57 – CHIPOTLE GRILL
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission:
1) That the Planning Commission, based on staff’s findings provided within this report, find that the subject use is in compliance with all of the conditions of approval set forth in the initial approval of Alcohol Sales Conditional Use Permit Case No. 57; and
2) Request that this matter be brought back before November 13, 2028, for another compliance review report. The Planning Commission shall note that this matter may be brought back to the Commission at any time should the applicant violate any conditions of approval or any City Codes, or should there be a need to modify, add, or remove a condition of approval.

7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (“CUP”) CASE NO. 542-5 - A COMPLIANCE REVIEW OF A CHURCH USE AT 12227 FLORENCE AVENUE, WITHIN THE M-2- PD, HEAVY MANUFACTURING – PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ZONE. (CALVARY

CHAPEL SANTA FE SPRINGS)
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission:
1) Find that the continued operation and maintenance of the subject church use, if conducted in strict compliance with the conditions of approval, will be harmonious with adjoining properties and surrounding uses in the area and will be in conformance with the overall purposes and objectives of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and consistent with the goals, policies, and programs of the City’s General Plan; and
2) Require that CUP Case No. 542-5 be subject to a compliance review in five (5) years on, or before, November 13, 2028, to ensure that the use is still operating in strict compliance with the conditions of approval as contained within this staff report.
3) Take such additional, relation action that may be desirable.

8. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (“CUP”) CASE NO. 730-3 - A COMPLIANCE

REVIEW TO ALLOW THE CONTINUED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A RESIDENTIAL-TREATMENT FACILITY LOCATED AT 11121 BLOOMFIELD November 13, 2023: Planning Commission Meeting Page 7 of 8 AVENUE, WITHIN THE M-2-BP, HEAVY MANUFACTURING – BUFFER PARKING, ZONE. (LA CADA)
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission:
1) Find that the continued operation and maintenance of the subject residentialtreatment facility, if conducted in strict compliance with the conditions of approval, will be harmonious with adjoining properties and surrounding uses in the area and will be in conformance with the overall purposes and objectives of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and consistent with the goals, policies, and programs of the City’s General Plan; and
2) Require that CUP Case No. 730-3 be subject to a compliance review in five (5) years on, or before, November 13, 2028, to ensure that the use is still operating in strict compliance with the conditions of approval as contained within this staff report.
3) Take such additional, relation action that may be desirable.

9. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (“CUP”) CASE NO. 775-3 – A COMPLIANCE REVIEW OF A DIRECT TRANSFER FACILITY AT 12739 LAKELAND ROAD, WITHIN THE M-2, HEAVY MANUFACTURING, ZONE. (CR & R, INC.) RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission:
1) Find that the continued operation and maintenance of the subject direct transfer facility, if conducted in strict compliance with the conditions of approval, will be harmonious with adjoining properties and surrounding uses in the area and will be in conformance with the overall purposes and objectives of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and consistent with the goals, policies, and programs of the City’s General Plan; and
2) Require that CUP Case No. 775 be subject to a compliance review in five (5) years on, or before, November 13, 2028, to ensure that the use is still operating in strict compliance with the conditions of approval as contained within this staff report. 3) Take such additional, relation action that may be desirable.

10. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (“CUP”) CASE NO. 797-2 - A COMPLIANCE REVIEW OF AN INDOOR BADMINTON FACILITY AT 11323 SHOEMAKER AVENUE, WITHIN THE M-1-PD, LIGHT MANUFACTURING – PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ZONE. (SFS BADMINTON CLUB)
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission:

1) Find that the continued operation and maintenance of the subject indoor badminton facility, if conducted in strict compliance with the conditions of approval, November 13, 2023: Planning Commission Meeting Page 8 of 8 will be harmonious with adjoining properties and surrounding uses in the area and will be in conformance with the overall purposes and objectives of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and consistent with the goals, policies, and programs of the City’s General Plan; and
2) Require that CUP Case No. 797-2 be subject to a compliance review in five (5) years on, or before, November 13, 2028, to ensure that the use is still operating in strict compliance with the conditions of approval as contained within this staff report.
3) Take such additional, relation action that may be desirable.

STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/AB1234 COUNCIL CONFERENCE REPORTING Commissioner announcements; requests for future agenda items; conference/meetings reports. Members of the Planning Commission will provide a brief report on meetings attended at the expense of the local agency as required by Government Code Section 53232.3(d).

ADJOURNMENT
I, Teresa Cavallo, Planning Secetary Clerk for the City of Santa Fe Springs hereby certify that a copy of this agenda has been posted no less than 72 hours at the following locations; City’s website at www.santafesprings.org; Santa Fe Springs City Hall, 11710 Telegraph Road; Santa Fe Springs City Library, 11700 Telegraph Road; and the Town Center Plaza (Kiosk), 11740 Telegraph Road.

ITEM #____

CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STAFF REPORT
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Wayne M. Morrell, Director of Planning

BY: Alejandro De Loera, Contract Planner

SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING (Continued from the September 11, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting) – ZONE DETERMINATION (“ZD”) CASE NO. 2023-01 – TO DETERMINE THAT A BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE

SYSTEM USE WITH DIRECT CONNECTION TO A PUBLIC UTILITY GRID

IS A SIMILAR AND COMPATIBLE USE WITH OTHER SIMILARLY
PRINCIPALLY PERMITTED USES LISTED IN THE M-2, HEAVY

MANUFACTURING, ZONE, AND ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA SECTION 15061(B)(3) (COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION). (GRIDSTOR LLC)
DATE: November 13, 2023
RECOMMENDATION(S):

It is recommended that the Planning Commission:
1) Continue with the Public Hearing and receive the written and oral staff report and any comments from the public regarding ZD Case No. 2023-01, related Environmental Exemption, and thereafter, close the Public Hearing; and 2) Find and determine that a battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid is similar to and compatible with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone and will not be inconsistent with the purpose of the M-2 Zone; and 3) Find and determine that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption); and
4) Approve ZD Case No. 2023-01, determining that a battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid is similar to and compatible with 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 2 of 25 ends

other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone and will not be inconsistent with the purpose of the M-2 Zone; and 5) Adopt Resolution No. 250-2023, which incorporates the Planning Commission’s findings and actions regarding the matter; and
6) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
BACKGROUND:

On July 24, 2023, GridStor LLC submitted a request for a Zone Determination for the Planning Commission review and determination that a battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid is a similar and compatible use with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M-L, Limited Manufacturing, Zone. It should be noted that following an in-depth review of the proposed use, staff is recommending that the proposed battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid be considered similar to and compatible with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone, in which all uses principally permitted in the M-L, Limited Manufacturing, Zone are also principally permitted uses.

Project/Applicant Information
Project Location: Citywide
Project Applicant: GridStor LLC
GridStor is a battery energy storage developer, owner, and operator backed by the Sustainability and Infrastructure Investing groups within Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Goldman Sachs), a leading clean energy investor. GridStor has assembled a team of experienced professionals with over 125 years of combined energy experience to develop, design, construct and operate battery energy storage systems at scale.

GridStor’s portfolio consists of multiple projects representing over 500 megawatts/2,000 megawatt hours of capacity, or enough to power approximately 375,000 California homes, with proposed on-line dates between 2024-2026.

Project Description
The Zone Determination request requires the review and determination of whether or not a battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid is a similar and compatible use with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone. A finding that the subject use is not inconsistent with the purpose of the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone is also required.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 3 of 25 ends

Previous Planning Commission Public Hearings
The subject Zone Determination was scheduled and duly noticed to be considered by the Planning Commission on September 11, 2023 (Attachment A & B).

On September 7, 2023, a comment letter (Attachment D) from Bridgeland Resources LLC, in opposition of the Project, was received by city staff.

On September 8, 2023, the Applicant submitted a request (Attachment E) to defer the Planning Commission’s consideration of the Project to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting on October 9, 2023.

On September 22, 2023, the Applicant submitted a response letter to staff addressing the concerns that were raised by Bridgeland Resources LLC’s comment letter.

Upon staff recommendation, the Planning Commission granted a continuance of the subject Zone Determination to the next regularly held Planning Commission meeting on October 9, 2023.

On October 5, 2023 the Applicant submitted a subsequent request to defer the Planning Commission consideration of the project to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting on November 13, 2023.

Upon staff recommendation, the Planning Commission granted a continuance of the subject Zone Determination to the next regularly held Planning Commission meeting on November 13, 2023. The continuances provided Staff and the Applicant time to properly respond to and conduct additional research necessary to address any concerns raised within Attachment D before they were provided to the Planning Commission for consideration with the requested Zone Determination.

ANALYSIS:

Battery Energy Storage
A utility scaled battery energy storage system is comprised of lithium ion batteries and control equipment housed in a series of purpose-built, free standing enclosure units. The batteries, together with related control equipment, including inverters, transformers, and onsite substation, would connect to a public utility grid. The system would receive electricity from transmission towers, store the energy in batteries and distribute the electricity back into the grid.

California Senate Bill 100 (SB 100) “The 100 Percent Clean Energy Act of 2018” outlines the state’s goal of powering all retail electricity sold in California with renewable and zerocarbon resources by 2045. SB100 mandates that electrical utility providers must have 100% of their energy generation from renewable sources by 2045. These electricity PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 4 of 25 ends

providers are faced with the challenge of making a variable resource consistent, dependable, and predictable to meet energy users’ needs. Battery energy storage systems provide critical infrastructure for reliable energy as the grid becomes increasingly dependent on intermittent renewable energy sources such as solar and wind. A 2021 assessment regarding SB100 progress identified energy storage systems as crucial in providing flexibility to the electrical grid. The report suggested that battery storage build rates need to increase by nearly eightfold to achieve 100% clean energy by the target year. Currently, peak renewable energy generation and peak demand for that energy occur at different times of the day. This disconnect between renewable energy generation and demand means that fossil fuels are used to supply the grid, rather than renewable sources. By storing generated renewable energy during peak times and distributing the energy back into the grid when and where needed, these systems help bridge the gap between peak clean energy generation and peak demand.

These systems are also key in building energy resiliency in the instances of power outages or rolling blackouts. By storing already generated energy, a battery energy storage system can be used as part of a backup plan to continue providing electricity to key users during a blackout. The energy storage systems can also help to stabilize demand (time of use) based electricity prices. By storing energy when there is overgeneration (when generation exceeds demand) of energy and distributing when the demand is higher, utility providers can pull from the stored energy rather than charge for energy being generated during off-peak generation times.

Site Design
As new battery storage projects are submitted, staff will review each project to ensure that the battery enclosures are arranged in an array along with inverters and transformers to convert voltage and current between the batteries and the onsite substation. Electrical equipment would be mounted on concrete foundations accessible by aggregate-base roads, which will be reviewed to ensure that they meet the Department of Fire-Rescue’s access requirements. Other areas on-site, not dedicated to electrical equipment or access roads, would be finished with an approved gravel or other groundcover as approved by the Planning Department.

Since the Zone Determination specifically identifies these battery storage systems as having a direct connect to a utility grid, an on-site substation in conjunction with the battery system with a switchyard and step-up transformer would be required to convert medium voltage power to the compatible voltage to be distributed to the electric grid. For added safety and security, staff will ensure that the substation area is securely fenced.

There is no site currently associated with this Zone Determination. One was originally shown as a potential location, however, until it is finally determined under this case as to the similar use and proper zone determination, a specific site is not being analyzed. If the Planning Commission approves this Zone Determination case, then any subsequent application will go through the standard process and review as to a specific site development.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 5 of 25 ends

Similarity to Electric Distribution Substation
All principally permitted uses in the M-L Zone and the M-1 Zone are also principally permitted uses in the M-2 Zone per SFSMC Sections 155.211(A) and 155.241(A).

After a thorough review of the proposed battery storage use and researching how they are classified in other cities, Staff finds that a battery energy storage system with direct connection to a public utility grid is similar to the following principally permitted use currently listed within the City’s M-L Zone:

Code Section: Principal Permitted Uses
155.181 (N) Electric Distribution substation, electric transmission substation and public utility buildings.

The proposed use is similar to a typical electrical distribution substation in that they both involve the following features and operations:

1. Receiving transmission of electricity from transmission towers; and

2. Distributing received electricity into a public utility grid; and

3. Require supplemental equipment on-site to monitor and control the use’s operation (i.e. circuit breakers, disconnects, safety systems, etc.); and

4. Are equipped with advanced safety features to prevent and mitigate the risk associated with high voltage electricity; and

5. Are unmanned and unattended operations with the exception of occasional maintenance.

A battery energy storage system use would be required to be connected to electrical transmission lines and then distribute the received energy back into a public utility grid.

This process is identical to that of a typical electric substation with the exception that the received energy may also be stored for a period of time in the batteries prior to being distributed back into the public utility grid.

Jurisdictions within Los Angeles County, including the County of Los Angeles and the City of Lancaster, permit battery energy storage system projects by-right in Industrial zones with only a ministerial (non-discretionary) site plan review. This means that approvals are granted without significant discretionary review.

The Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning prepared and posted a memorandum titled “Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance Interpretation No. 2021-03 – Battery Electric Storage Systems,” dated October 18, 2021. In this memorandum, it stated that for the purposes of land use, battery energy storage systems are most similar to electric distribution substations.

In addition to jurisdictions making the determination that energy storage systems are likened to electric distribution substations, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) recognizes that energy storage systems distribute energy, much like an electrical PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 6 of 25 ends

distribution substation would. The CPUC is the regulatory agency that oversees privately owned public utilities in the state of California.

To clarify, California Public Utilities Code section 2835(a)(1) defines an “energy storage system” to mean a commercially available technology that is capable of absorbing energy, storing it for a period of time, and thereafter dispatching the energy (Cal. Pub. Util. Code, § 2835(a)(1)). In other words, an energy storage system is designed to absorb, store, and release energy, which aligns with the functionality of a batter energy storage system.

Because a proposed battery energy storage system use is similar to an electric distribution substation, which is a permitted use in the M-2 Zone with other heavy industrial uses, it should be principally permitted in the M-2 Zone without a CUP.

Compatibility with uses listed as permitted in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone A proposed battery energy storage system use is not any more intense than a typical electric distribution substation. There are several other electrical distribution substations currently within the City including at 14127 Carmenita Road, 12714 Los Nietos Road, and another at the southeast corner of Pioneer Boulevard and Rivera Road. The battery energy storage system process is similar to that of a typical electric substation with the exception that the received energy may also be stored for a period of time in the batteries prior to being distributed back into the public utility grid.

Screening, setbacks, landscaping and other development standards typical with an electrical distribution substation will be required for any battery energy storage system.

Strict compliance to the development standards and state regulatory procedures will ensure that battery energy storage system uses with direct connection to a public utility grid will be compatible with other uses permitted in the zone.

Noise and visual impacts associated with the use will be minimized by utilizing enclosure units and proper screening throughout the site. All construction and permitting related to the project will be reviewed by the Planning, Building, and Fire Department. As such, all Zoning, Building, and Fire safety codes will be met. Additionally, the battery energy storage system will be monitored and controlled at a level similar to a typical electric substation.

Not inconsistent with the purpose of the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone The purpose of the M-2, Heaving Manufacturing, Zone as stated in Section 155.240 of the City of Santa Fe Springs Zoning Ordinance is for heavy industrial uses and, among other things, to promote uniform and orderly industrial development. A proposed battery energy storage system use is not inconsistent with other industrial uses permitted in the M-2 Zone such as an electrical distribution substation. A battery storage system use is no more intense than other principally permitted uses in the M-2 Zone and is compatible with the uses of that zone. The subject use is not expected to interfere with any portion of the purpose of the M-2 Zone to create an aesthetically pleasing and desirable industrial PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 7 of 25 ends

environment. Battery energy storage system uses with direct connection to a public utility grid are well suited to comply with the aesthetic and operational requirements to fulfill and further the purpose of the M-2 Zone.

Safety of Battery Energy Storage Systems
Even though safety issues are not part of the similar use analysis and this Zone Determination, because a public comment letter raised some concerns, Staff would like to address them in the report.

Battery energy storage systems and their associated safety technology continue to evolve rapidly. Understanding the risk of lithium-ion batteries, safety technologies primarily revolve around fire prevention and mitigation, particularly in the context of thermal runaway. Battery energy storage systems are meticulously monitored down to an individual battery cell level. If a battery exhibits irregular behavior, it is designed to automatically disconnect from the system and pass an inspection before reconnection. In the unlikely event of a fire risk, entire sections of battery storage units can be turned off to prevent further spread.

Furthermore, the design of each individual battery storage unit includes measures to ensure that fires are contained within the individual units. For example, an incident on September 19, 2023, when a battery storage facility in San Diego, California, caught on fire, the facility’s fire suppression systems successfully contained the fire within a specific battery storage unit, as designed, and it did not spread to other parts of the facility or the surrounding area.

In addition, battery energy storage systems are equipped with standard fire prevention and suppression systems within each battery storage unit. Each unit is equipped with air conditioning to regulate temperatures, and the enclosure units themselves are engineered to contain any fires that might occur within the unit. Having built in fire repression systems within each unit means that even in the rare event of isolated fires, they can typically be effectively contained within a single battery storage unit.

In addition to the safety monitoring, detection, prevention and suppression systems discussed above, the following are typical battery energy storage system development and operation protocols:
• Engineering Standards and Testing: Batteries are rigorously designed, manufactured, tested, and certified to adhere with the highest safety standards.

They must pass large-scale fire testing under Underwriters Laboratory certification. • Proper Temperature Management: Projects are equipped with thermal management systems including ventilation, heating equipment, and cooling equipment, to maintain safe operating temperatures and humidity for the batteries. • Battery Health Sensors: Projects are equipped with sensors that monitor battery voltage, current, temperatures and health to ensure early detection and mitigation of issues.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 8 of 25 ends

• Fire Safety Equipment: Energy storage facilities include equipment and systems designed to detect thermal events, vent gasses, and mitigate propagation of any fire or thermal event.
• 24/7 Monitoring by Trained Personnel: Energy storage facilities are continuously monitored 24/7 by trained personnel prepared to ensure safety and respond to emergency events.
• Protected Access: Access to these facilities is restricted to authorized personnel only, similar to the practices of local utilities for their facilities. • Emergency Response Plans: A project-specific emergency response plan is created to ensure that, if there is an emergency, it is handled safely and in accordance with best practices.

The following are standard codes and requirements for battery energy storage systems:

Built Environment
• International Fire Code (IFC) and the International Building Code (IBC) • The IFC and IBC reference other codes including National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) codes
• The California Fire and Building codes are based on the IFC and IBC Battery Energy Storage System (BESS)
• Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 9540 – Energy Storage System Safety Standards • NFPA 855 - Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems Installation
• NFPA 70 - National Electrical Code (NEC)
• UL 9540A - Battery Energy Storage System Test Method
BESS Components
• UL 1973 - Standard for Batteries for Use in Stationary, Vehicle Auxiliary Power and Light Electric Rail(LER) Applications
• UL 1741 - Standard for Safety Inverters, Converters, Controllers and Interconnection System Equipment for Use With Distributed Energy Resources These standard codes and requirements, along with reviews by the City’s Planning, Building, and Fire Departments will ensure that all future battery energy storage systems proposed within the City will be will be in full compliance with all applicable city, state, and federal regulations. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) would also be required to provide approval of a commissioning and decommissioning plan for each battery storage project with direct connection to the public utility grid prior to operation.

In addition to these standard protocols, GridStor LLC intends to partner with the City’s Fire Department to provide specialized training to first responders. The training will cover appropriate responses to battery energy storage system emergencies, including the mitigation of any fire or thermal event.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 9 of 25 ends

Concerns Raised by Bridgeland Comment Letter
The following table consists of collaborative responses to specific issues raised by Bridgeland’s Comment Letter (Attachment D). For GridStor LLC’s specific responses to the concerns, please see Exhibit A of Attachment F.

Concern Response
1 Battery storage uses create a
unique and well-documented
hazard that includes the risk of
fires, toxic gas releases, and
explosions.

While there are potential hazards
associated with battery storage systems,
these risks are effectively mitigated through
industry standards for battery energy
storage systems, as detailed in the “Safety
of Battery Energy Storage Systems”
section of this report.
2 [I]f the City determines that battery
storage uses should be allowed
anywhere in the M-2 zone, then the
City should, at the very least,
require a conditional use permit
(“CUP”) to ensure that battery
storage uses remain safe, suitably
located, and appropriately
conditioned to protect the
community.

Battery energy storage with a direct
connection to a public utility grid are being
likened to an “electrical distribution
substation,” which is principally permitted in
the M-2 zone. Safety concerns regarding
the use are appropriately addressed within
the required review of City Departments,
the industry standards of such a use, and
the California Public Utilities Commission.

Further, if deemed similar to other
permitted uses within the M-2 zone, it
would be permitted and a CUP would not
be required. As this is also being equated
to an electrical substation, which is
permitted in the M-2 zone without a CUP,
this similar use would also be permitted
without a CUP.
3 GridStor proposes siting battery
facilities directly on top of portions
of the Romandel Site on which
Bridgeland has surface rights for
future oil extraction. If constructed,
the Project will both endanger
Bridgeland’s existing operations
and interfere with Bridgeland’s
surface rights.

Though this concern is site-specific, any
site proposed to be developed with a
battery energy storage system would be
required to identify and be compliant with
any and all easements and surface rights.
4 Battery storage uses are not similar
to the other principally permitted
uses in the M-2 zone. Notably, the
code fails to list any other energy
storage-type use as a principally
permitted or even conditionally
Battery energy storage systems with direct
connection to a public utility grid uses are
being likened to an electrical distribution
substation use, which is principally
permitted within the M-2 zone, as detailed
in the “Similarity to Electric Distribution
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 10 of 25 ends

permitted use. At best, the code
allows “public utility service yards.”
See SFSMC § 155.241(X).

Substation” section of this report. Further,
based on analysis in this staff report, such
use is not inconsistent with the purpose of
the M-2 zone and, as staff has stated, fits
best with the other such permitted uses in
the M-2 zone.
5 The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (“FEMA”)
states that the “lithium cells in
[battery storage projects] can
experience thermal runaway which
causes them to release very hot
flammable, toxic gases. In large
storage systems, failure of one
lithium cell can cascade to include
hundreds of individual cells. The
hot flammable gases can result in
an explosion, or a very difficult to
extinguish fire.”
Though there are potential hazards to
battery storage systems, these hazards are
properly mitigated through industry
standards for battery energy storage
systems, as detailed in the “Safety of
Battery Energy Storage Systems” section
of this report. Further information is
provided in Exhibit A of Attachment F.
6 A recent American Chemical
Society publication, for instance,
states that “[l]ithium ion batteries
are prone to overheating, swelling,
electrolyte leakage venting, fires,
smoke, and explosions in worstcases scenarios involving thermal runaway…. [T]the gases produced
as a result of a fire, smoke, and/or
thermal runaway can accumulate to
a combustible level in the
installation location and cause an
explosion (detonation).”
The prevention and mitigation of potential
hazards including thermal runaway and
detonation are appropriately addressed
within the required review of City
Departments, the industry standards of
such a use, and the California Public
Utilities Commission. Further information is
provided in Exhibit A of Attachment F.
7 This risk is not theoretical. Consider
the following news articles detailing
recent battery storage fires and firerelated injuries in California, Arizona, and New York, among
others [.]” Bridgeland cites seven
articles.

The articles detail isolated incidents of
failure in battery energy storage projects.

The California example listed includes a
fire that was actually effectively contained
within the battery storage unit that caught
fire. The articles also detail how Fire Codes
are being updated to adequately address
concerns that have come from earlier
issues of battery storage technology.

Though there are potential hazards to
battery storage systems, these hazards are
properly mitigated through industry
standards for battery energy storage
systems, as detailed in the “Safety of
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 11 of 25 ends

Battery Energy Storage Systems” section
of this report. Further information is
provided in Exhibit A of Attachment F.
8 [I]f the City believes that some
battery storage uses should be
allowed in the M-2 zone, such use
that should not be permitted by
right. At minimum, the City should
require a CUP for battery storage
uses in the M-2 zone.

Battery energy storage system with direct
connection to a public utility grid uses are
being likened to an electrical distribution
substation use, which is principally
permitted, without a CUP, within the M-2
zone, as detailed in the “Similarity to
Electric Distribution Substation” section of
this report. As stated above, such use is
not inconsistent with the purpose of the M2 zone and, fits best with the other such permitted uses in the M-2 zone.
9 The City already requires various
potentially hazardous uses to
obtain a CUP, including the
manufacture of chlorine and other
chemicals (see SFSMC §
155.243(A)(1-31), the storage of
large quantities of oil, flammable
gases, or flammable liquids (see
SFSMC § 155.243(B)(1), (3)), the
storage of explosives or black
powder (SFSMC § 155.243(B)(5)),
and petroleum refining (SFSMC §
155.243(F)(1)). In fact, the City also
requires a CUP in the M-2 zone for
a variety of mostly benign activities,
such as ambulance services
(SFSMC § 155.243(J)(1), dog
kennels (SFSMC § 155.243(J)(11),
and motorcycle sales (SFSMC §
155.243(J)(16)). High-risk battery
storage should not escape the
same scrutiny.

Though there are potential hazards to
battery storage systems, these hazards are
properly mitigated through industry
standards for battery energy storage
systems, as detailed in the “Safety of
Battery Energy Storage Systems” section
of this report.
10 Conditional use permits … explicitly
require the Commission to
determine whether the use would
“be detrimental to persons or
property in the immediate vicinity”
or would “adversely affect the city in
general.” SFSMC § 155.716. And
conditional use permits specifically
allow the Commission to condition
the project to ensure “proper
A site-specific project for a battery energy
storage system with direct connection to a
public utility grid is not under consideration
by the Planning Commission nor is an
application for a Conditional Use Permit
(CUP), therefore the findings for granting a
CUP are not required as part of this
request. However, to grant the Zone
Determination, the Planning Commission is
still required to find that a battery energy
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 12 of 25 ends

integration of the [use] into the
community, which may only be
suitable in specific locations….”
SFSMC § 155.711; see also
SFSMC § 155.718 (allowing for
conditions of approval). Given the
clear risks presented by battery
storage uses, the City should
require a CUP in order to ensure
that any proposed battery storage
project will be safe, suitably
located, and appropriately
conditioned to protect the
community.
storage system use is not inconsistent with
the purpose of the M-2 Zone, is similar to
other permitted uses in that zone, and is
compatible with those uses.
11 Allowing battery storage uses by
CUP is a legislative task for the
City Council, not the Commission.

A site-specific battery energy storage
system project with direct connection to a
public utility grid is not under consideration
by the Planning Commission or other
approving or advisory body for a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The action
under this ZD case is to determine whether
it is a use similar to an electrical substation
and the appropriate zone, which is within
the Planning Commission’s authority.
12 The Romandel Site’s extremely
close proximity to Bridgeland’s oil
operations and facilities not only
increases the inherent risks
associated with battery storage
uses but also adds additional risks
to Bridgeland’s oil operations. A
fire, explosion, or expulsion of toxic
gas at the Project could cause
additional fires or dangers at
Bridgeland’s oil facilities. Although
Bridgeland takes all precautions in
operating its oil facilities, and
although oil and gas operations are
dramatically less risky that battery
storage uses, oil and gas
operations nevertheless present
their own risks; and these should
not be compounded by locating a
battery storage use at the
Romandel Site.

Though this is a site specific questions, any
battery energy storage system with
direction connection to a public utility grid
would be required to comply with fire,
health, and safety laws and regulation and
industry standards which means the use
would not pose a risk to adjacent
operations.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 13 of 25 ends

13 In addition to Bridgeland’s existing
operations and facilities, pursuant
to the Unit Agreement and
Bridgeland’s role as unit operator,
Bridgeland holds rights that allow it
to expand its oil production
operations and construct new
facilities on the Bridgeland-owned
parcel, the Romandel Site, and
other lands in the vicinity. Should
Bridgeland choose to exercise
these rights, the Project’s
associated risks would be
increased even further by close
proximity to additional oil operations
and facilities. For example,
Bridgeland may redrill or rework the
existing idle oil well so that it
actively produces oil. Moreover, the
Project would significantly impede
and interfere with Bridgeland’s
rights to use portions of the surface
of the Romandel Site for oil
operations and facilities.

Consequently, the Project could
increase the danger associated
with Bridgeland’s oil operations in
the event use of portions of the
Romandel Site becomes
necessary.

Though this concern is site specific, any
site proposed to be developed with a
battery energy storage system would be
required to identify and be compliant with
any and all easements and surface rights.

Additionally, any battery energy storage
system with direction connection to a public
utility grid would be required to comply with
fire, health, and safety laws and regulation
and industry standards which means the
use would not pose a risk to adjacent
operations.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The proposed Zone Determination is an activity, but not subject to CEQA under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15060(c)(2), because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The Zone Determination is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines. The Common Sense Exemption affirms that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. If it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question will have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. A zone determination that a battery energy storage system with direct connection to a public utility grid is a similar and compatible use with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone will not have a significant effect on the environment in that the only action being taken is an interpretation of the Zoning Code. It is not site specific, nor is there any aspect or details of the future project PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 14 of 25 ends

to be analyzed. Thus, with certainty this Zone Determination cannot possibly have a significant effect on the environment.

Any proposed projects that meet the criteria of a battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid will be individually subject to CEQA review as to the site and the components of that individual project.

DISCUSSION:

Criteria for a Zone Determination
Pursuant to Section 155.241(Y) of the City of Santa Fe Springs Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission may, after study and deliberation, allow other similar uses as a principally permitted use if they are found not to be inconsistent with the purpose of the M-2 zone, they are similar to the uses listed as permitted uses, and they would be compatible with those uses.

It is therefore recommended that, before approving a Zone Determination, the Commission shall find that all of the following apply:
(A) That the subject use is not inconsistent with the purpose of the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone.
(B) That the subject use would be similar to the uses listed as permitted in the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone.
(C)That the subject use would be compatible with the uses listed as permitted in the M2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone.

Upon review of the proposed use and background materials provided along with the application, staff finds the applicant’s request meets the criteria set forth in the City’s Zoning Ordinance. Recommended findings to support this conclusion may be found in the attached Resolution No. 250-2023 (see Attachment I). Staff is therefore recommending that the Planning Commission approve ZD Case No. 2023-01.

SUMMARY
Public Notification
This matter was set for Public Hearing in accordance with the requirements of Sections 65090 through 65096 of the State Planning, Zoning, and Development Laws and the requirements of Sections 155.860 through 155.864 of the City’s Municipal Code.

Legal notice of the Public Hearing for the proposed project was sent by first class mail to all property owners whose names and addresses appear on the latest County Assessor's Roll within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of what was used as a subject property on PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 15 of 25 ends

August 31, 2023. The legal notice was also posted at City Hall and the City’s Town Center kiosk on August 31, 2023. Said notice was also published in a newspaper of general circulation (Whittier Daily News) on August 31, 2023 as required by the State Zoning and Development Laws and by the City’s Zoning Ordinance. On September 7, 2023 a comment letter submitted by Bridgeland (Attachment D) in opposition of the project was submitted to Staff. On September 11, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Fe Springs opened the public hearing for this item and continued the item to the next scheduled public hearing. Responses to the comments raised by the letter have been included as part of this report. On October 9, 2023, six (6) petition letters were sent to staff from residents of the Villages at Heritage Springs in opposition of the project. As of the date of this report, staff has not received any further inquiry regarding the proposed project.

As previously stated, there is no specific site proposed, however, notice was provided to property owners surrounding the potential site out of an abundance of caution.

ATTACHMENT(S):

1. Attachment A – Public Hearing Notice

2. Attachment B – Radius Map for Public Hearing

3. Attachment C – GridStor Fact Sheet

4. Attachment D – Bridgeland Comment Letter dated September 7, 2023

5. Attachment E – GridStor LLC Request for Continuation dated September 8, 2023

6. Attachment F – GridStor LLC Response Letter dated September 22, 2023 a. Exhibit A – Table of GridStor LLC Responses

7. Attachment G – Resident Opposition Letters

8. Attachment H – CEQA Notice of Exemption

9. Attachment I – Resolution No. 250-2023
ITEM STATUS:

APPROVED:

DENIED:

TABLED:

DIRECTION GIVEN:

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 16 of 25 ends

ATTACHMENT A:

PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 17 of 25 ends

ATTACHMENT B:

RADIUS MAP FOR PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 18 of 25 ends

ATTACHMENT C:

GRIDSTOR FACT SHEET
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 19 of 25 ends

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 20 of 25 ends

ATTACHMENT D:

BRIDGELAND COMMENT LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 21 of 25 ends

ATTACHMENT E:

GRIDSTOR LLC REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 22 of 25 ends

ATTACHMENT F:

GRIDSTOR LLC RESPONSE LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 22, 2023
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 23 of 25 ends

ATTACHMENT G:

RESIDENT OPPOSITION LETTERS
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 24 of 25 ends

ATTACHMENT H:

CEQA NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Page 25 of 25 ends

ATTACHMENT I:

RESOLUTION NO. 250-2023

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NOVEMBER 13, 2023
By: Alejandro De Loera
Zone Determination 2023-01
Use to be Determined: Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Location: Citywide (M-2 Zone)
Applicant: GridStor LLC
Purpose of Request: Battery energy storage systems are not currently a listed use in the Zoning Ordinance. As a result, a determination as to which zone they shall be allowed
Zone Determination
 This Zone Determination allows the Planning
Commission to make a decision of where a battery energy storage system shall be allowed
 Similar uses are generally examined to show how the
proposed use is similar to other uses currently listed
within the Zoning Ordinance.
 Based on existing listed uses, a BESS use is most similar to an electric distribution substation use
Request
A request to determine that a Battery Energy
Storage System with direct connection to a public
utility grid is a similar and compatible use with
other similarly principally permitted uses listed in
the M-2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone.

Battery Energy Storage System
SB 100: California goal to achieve 100
percent of electricity retail sales and
state loads from renewable and zerocarbon resources in California by 2045.

Includes 48,600 MW new battery
storage installed in 2020–2045
Public good: Utility scaled operation
Blackouts: Energy and grid resilience
Pricing: Long term stabilization of
demand based electricity
Battery Energy Storage System
• A utility scaled BESS is comprised of lithium ion batteries within enclosure units
• The batteries, together with
related equipment and onsite
substation, would connect to a
public utility grid
• BESS receive electricity from
transmission towers, store the
energy in batteries and
distribute the electricity back
into the grid
Similarity to Substation

1. Transmission

2. Distribution

3. Equipment on-site to
monitor and control the use’s
operation

4. Safety features for high
voltage electricity

5. Unmanned and unattended
• Modern substation
• AB 2868
Substation Interpretation
Los Angeles County: “For purposes of defining energy
storage devices as a land use, energy storage devices shall be considered most similar to EDS [Electric Distribution Substation.]”
City of Lancaster: BESS is permitted by-right in
Industrial zones
California Public Utilities Commission: Defines an
“energy storage system” to mean a commercially available technology that is capable of absorbing energy, storing it for a period of time, and thereafter dispatching the energy, California Public Utilities Code section 2835(a)(1)
Public Hearing
• Published in the Whittier Daily News on August 31, 2023 • Posted in City Hall, Town Center Kiosk, and the City
Library
• Noticed to property owners in 500’ radius
• Opposition letters were received on September 8, October 9, and November 13
• The item was continued on the September 11 and October 9 Planning Commission meetings to allow staff additional time to respond to comment letters that were received by the public
Public Comments
Bridgeland Letter

1. Battery Energy Storage Uses are dissimilar
and incompatible to other principally permitted
uses in the M-2 Zone

2. The use should require a CUP at a minimum

3. Proposed project highlights risk of allowing battery storage systems Resident Opposition Letters

4. Battery energy storage uses present a unique risk – a full safety and environmental review should be completed
There were several site specific questions, however this project is only a zone determination and no specific site is under review at this time Public Comments
I. Similar and Compatible
II. Principally Permitted
III. Safety – Typical BESS
I. Similar and Compatible
• Similar to substation with the exception that BESS can store received energy for a period of time
• There are currently several substations in the City
including 14127 Carmenita Rd and 12714 Los Nietos Rd
• Proven compatibility within the M-2 Zone
 Substation is listed as a permitted use in the M-L Zone  Substations are permitted in the ML, M-1, and M-2
Zones by right
II. Principally Permitted
• Electrical distribution substations are permitted by right in the ML Zone and are also therefore permitted by right in the M-1 and M-2 Zones
• In addition to a substation, a BESS use could be found similar to a public utilities service yard, which is
permitted by right within the M-2 Zone
• These similar uses would indicate that BESS uses should also be permitted by right
III. Safety – Typical BESS
• BESS are remotely monitored at an individual battery
cell level
• Should a battery exhibit irregular behavior, it is designed to automatically disconnect from the system
 Must pass an inspection before reconnection
• Enclosures are designed to ensure that fires are
contained within the individual units
• Enclosures, batteries, installation and equipment must meet state and local safety standards
• All future BESS projects will be required to be reviewed by the City’s Planning, Building, and Fire Departments
Environmental
• The Zone Determination is exempt from CEQA pursuant
to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the
CEQA Guidelines.
• This Zone Determination will not have a significant effect on the environment in that the only action being taken is an interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance
• Any future projects would be individually subject to CEQA CEQA

CALIFORNIA ENVIORNMENTAL

QUALITY ACT
Considerations
• Zone Determination – not a site specific review
• BESS is part of the public utility grid
• Meet California renewable energy goals
• Similarity to substation and public utility service
yards, both of which are permitted by right
• Proposed to be permitted by right in the M-2 Zone, as per 155.241(Y)
• Safety measures associated with BESS uses will be
reviewed by the City for all future projects
Recommendations
• Approve ZD Case No. 2023-01, determining that a
battery energy storage system use with direct connection to a public utility grid is similar to and compatible with other similarly principally permitted uses listed in the M2, Heavy Manufacturing, Zone and will not be inconsistent with the purpose of the M-2 Zone; and
• Find and determine that the project is exempt from
the CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common
Sense Exemption); and
• Adopt Resolution No. 250-2023, which incorporates the Planning Commission’s findings and actions regarding
the matter
5229795.3
Ernest J. Guadiana
D: 310.746.4425
[email protected]
Ref: 14355-0003
November 21, 2023

VIA E-MAIL & FEDEX
Santa Fe Springs
City Council
11710 E. Telegraph Road
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Re: Battery Storage Uses in M-2 Zone; Appeal of Zone Determination Case No. 2023-01.

Dear Councilmembers:

We start with two news excerpts from two real-world battery storage fires:

Santa Fe Springs could be next.

Our client, Bridgeland Resources LLC (“Bridgeland”) owns a number of properties throughout Sante Fe Springs (“City”) and has surface rights for oil operations at several others.

Through this letter, Bridgeland appeals the Planning Commission’s contested, 3-2 approval of Zone Determination No. 2023-01 establishing that a “battery energy storage system” constitutes a principally permitted use in the M-2 zone.

Make no mistake: Staff has indicated that no other discretionary approvals would be required for battery storage uses. Applicant GridStor, Inc. (“Grisdstor”), meanwhile, seeks to construct an enormous, 9.3-acre, 10-parcel, 90-megawatt battery storage use surrounding Bridgeland’s property (“Project’). Accordingly, if this Council approves the Zone City of Santa Fe Springs
City Council
November 21, 2023

Page 2 ends

5229795.3
Determination, this and other even larger battery storage uses would be allowed in Santa Fe Springs without any discretionary review whatsoever.

As explained below, the findings for a Zone Determination cannot be made because battery storage uses are not similar or compatible with the other principally permitted uses in the M-2 zone. At the Planning Commission hearing, City staff and GridStor, disagreed, arguing that battery storage uses are sufficiently analogous to electrical distribution substations, which are permitted in the M-2 zone. This analogy fails. Besides being physically and conceptually dissimilar, battery storage uses present unique dangers that electric distribution substations do not. Notably, battery storage uses present an unacceptable risk of fire, toxic gas release, and explosion—a risk borne out by recent fires and explosions at battery storage facilities in California, Arizona, and New York, among others.

Over twenty-one community members have submitted letters opposing the Zone Determination; respectfully, this Council should too. While the Council should prohibit battery storage uses in the M-2 zone altogether, at minimum, the City should not authorize battery storage uses by right. Instead, if the Council determines that battery storage uses should be allowed anywhere in the M-2 Zone, then the City should, at the very least, require a conditional use permit (“CUP”) to ensure that battery storage uses remain safe, suitably located, and appropriately conditioned to protect the community.

I. Staff Has Indicated Battery Storage Uses Would Be Allowed By Right Without a Development Plan or Any Discretionary Review.

Staff has stated that it has no intention of requiring a development plan approval or any other discretionary review (e.g., CUP) for battery storage uses in the City. We understand that this is because the City has sometimes historically not required development plan approvals for electric distribution substations. The below email from City Planner Alejandro De Loera to GridStor representative Matrell Everett confirms that “No Development Plan Approval is required” for GridStor’s proposed 9.3-acre battery storage use:

City of Santa Fe Springs
City Council
November 21, 2023

Page 3 ends

5229795.3
During the Planning Commission hearing, Staff and GridStor downplayed this result, noting that any project will still have to go through the plan check process, which requires projects to be reviewed by the City’s planning, fire, building & safety, and other departments.

This Council should not be misled: Plan check review is, by definition, ministerial— meaning that the City has no discretion to deny a project (i.e., it must approve the project and issue a building permit) as long as the project complies with the building code, development standards, etc. But City and State codes do not address or discuss or mitigate the potential impacts of battery storage uses. More importantly, the City would not have the ability to deny a project due to the type of use, the dangerousness of the use, the incompatibility with surrounding uses, concerns about the operator, or any of the other factors normally considered as part of the development plan and/or CUP process.

City of Santa Fe Springs
City Council
November 21, 2023

Page 4 ends

5229795.3
This result makes no sense: The City requires a CUP for dangerous uses (e.g., ammunition storage) or potentially incompatible uses (e.g., dog kennels), even in the M-2 zone. And it requires a development plan approval for nearly all development in the City. The purpose of the discretionary review process is to allow the Planning Commission (and City Council on appeal) to craft conditions of approval in order to ensure that all such uses are appropriate and pose no risk to the community. Here, no conditions of approval would be allowed.

The City Attorney and Planning Director further attempted to downplay this result by stating that the Zone Determination would not approve any particular project, such as the GridStor project (which the Planning Commissioners clearly opposed). But again, this ignores the fact that a future project will be subject only to ministerial, by-right review. Which means that approving the Zone Determination does effectively approve the GridStor project—and any other battery storage use sited in the M-2 Zone, no matter how large. This City Council knows better. The City should not allow battery storage uses without a discretionary review process.

II. Battery Storage Facilities are Not Similar to Electric Distribution Substations.

When the Zone Determination came before the Planning Commission, GridStor and Staff argued that the City could approve the Zone Determination because battery storage uses are similar to electric distribution substations, which are permitted in the M-2 zone. SFSMC, § 155.181(N); see Reed Smith’s September 22, 2023, letter sent on behalf of GridStor (“GridStor Letter”), p. 2; Staff Report, p. 5. A battery storage use, they argued, is similar to an electric distribution substation “in size, bulk, and components including: switchgears, breakers, transformers, meters, circuits, and SCADA equipment.” GridStor Letter, p. 2; see also Staff Report, p. 5 (making similar claims).

This argument makes no sense. While electric substations and battery storage share a handful of superficially similar physical components (e.g., transformers, circuits, etc.), they are not remotely comparable in size or bulk. A small distribution substation, for example, may be as little as 500 square feet and may contain little more than a transformer and associated switches.

While exceptions exist, even the largest distribution substations typically do not occupy more than a couple of acres. (And on larger parcels, setbacks and unoccupied space make up the majority of the parcel—indeed, this is the case for substations in Santa Fe Springs.) GridStor, by contrast, proposes a 9.3-acre, 10-parcel project with edge-to-edge battery energy storage system (BESS) units. Further, battery storage uses and electric distribution substations remain physically and conceptually distinct uses. To state the obvious: Battery storage uses use batteries to store electricity; electric distribution substations do not. Distribution substations transform electric voltages from high to low in order to distribute electricity for use by City of Santa Fe Springs
City Council
November 21, 2023

Page 5 ends

5229795.3
end use customers. Indeed, the Project requires distribution substations to work, highlighting the conceptually distinct purposes of these uses. See Plans, Sheets C-01 and C-02.

More importantly, these superficial physical similarities have little bearing on whether uses are “similar” or “compatible.” By GridStor’s logic, an adult entertainment store and a Barnes & Noble are analogous because they both sell magazines to customers within a brick and mortar retail space. In reality, having similar physical components or being similar in size or bulk does not mean that two uses are compatible or have similar impacts.

Here, battery storage uses present unique and undeniable hazards virtually unseen at electrical substations, including the high risk of fires, explosions, and the release of toxic gases.

See Emerging Hazards of Battery Energy System Fires, FEMA, October 27, 2020 (available at:
https://www.fema.gov/case-study/emerging-hazards-battery-energy-storage-system-fires). A multitude of scientific literature and trade publications agree. A recent American Chemical Society publication, for instance, states that “[l]ithium ion batteries are prone to overheating, swelling, electrolyte leakage venting, fires, smoke, and explosions in worst-cases scenarios involving thermal runaway…. [T]the gases produced as a result of a fire, smoke, and/or thermal runaway can accumulate to a combustible level in the installation location and cause an explosion (detonation).” Battery Hazards for Large Energy Storage Systems, ACS Energy Letters 2022 7 (8), 2725-2733, p. 2726.

GridStor has attempted to evade these risks by pointing to the safety measures they will employ to reduce these risks. See GridStor September 22, 2023 Letter, pp. 4-5. Staff likewise noted in its staff report to the Planning Commission that battery storage uses may be “equipped with advanced safety features to prevent and mitigate the risk associated with high voltage electricity….” Staff Report, p . 5; see also Staff Report, pp. 9-13 (discussing safety issues). We question these measure’s effectiveness. While Bridgeland appreciates the safety measures outlined in GridStor’s letter and the Planning Commission’s Staff Report, respectfully, this position fundamentally ignores that catastrophic battery storage failure can occur and have frequently occurred—including by well-meaning operators taking similar safety precautions—in a way basically unheard of in electric distribution substations, the purportedly similar use.

Further, even assuming GridStor’s project would be perfectly safe, this Zone Determination would authorize battery storage uses throughout the M-2 zone without the need (in Staff’s opinion) for any other discretionary review at all; no guarantee exists that other operators will be as prudent or cautious.

City of Santa Fe Springs
City Council
November 21, 2023

Page 6 ends

5229795.3
This risk remains real. Consider the following news articles detailing recent battery storage fires and fire-related injuries in California, Arizona, and New York, among others:
• Recent California Energy Storage Battery Fire Draws Renewed Attention to Storage Safety Issues, American Public Power Association, October 17, 2022 (available at: https://www.publicpower.org/periodical/article/recent-californiaenergy-storage-battery-fire-draws-renewed-attention-storage-safety-issues):
• Four Firefighters Injured in Lithium-Ion Battery Energy Storage System Explosion—Arizona, Fire Safety Research Institute, July 29, 2020 (available at:
https://fsri.org/research-update/report-four-firefighters-injured-lithium-ionbattery-energy-storage-system). • Fire Smolders at Chandler Battery Storage Facility Nearly Two Weeks Later, Arizona Family, April 29, 2022 (available at:
https://www.azfamily.com/2022/04/30/fire-smolders-chandler-battery-storagefacility-nearly-two-weeks-later/). • Burning Concern: Energy Storage Industry Battles Battery Fires, S&P Global Market Intelligence, May 24, 2019 (available at:
https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-newsheadlines/burning-concern-energy-storage-industry-battles-battery-fires51900636). • Fires at New York Battery Energy Storage System Facilities Ignite State Response, JDSupra, August 14, 2023 (available at:
https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/fires-at-new-york-battery-energy-2554545/).

Given these distinct risks, the City cannot find that battery storage uses are “similar to the uses listed as permitted uses and … compatible to those uses.” As such, it cannot permit them by right.

III. At Minimum, Battery Storage Uses Should Require a Conditional Use Permit Battery storage uses present unique risks, including the risk of fire, explosion, and the expulsion of toxic gases. For these reasons, the City should prohibit battery storage uses in the M-2 zone. However, if the City believes that some battery storage uses should be allowed in the M-2 zone, such uses should not be permitted by right. At minimum, the City should require a CUP for battery storage uses in the M-2 Zone.

City of Santa Fe Springs
City Council
November 21, 2023

Page 7 ends
← All documents from this meeting