ITEM STATUS:
APPROVED:
DENIED:
TABLED:
DIRECTION GIVEN:
ANALYSIS
The Local CEQA Guidelines incorporate the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Code of California Regulations, Division 6, Chapter 3 §§ 15000 -15387) and provide procedural details and requirements for adhering to CEQA at the City level. These Local Guidelines delineate the procedural steps for the City, applicants, and the public, to follow. The Local CEQA Guidelines play a pivotal role in balancing environmental protection with local development needs, all while promoting public engagement and adherence to legal standards.
ENVIRONMENTAL
Adoption of the Local CEQA Guidelines is categorically exempt from the provisions of the CEQA per CEQA Guidelines Section 15308 (Class 8 – Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment) because it involves an adoption of Local CEQA Guidelines. It does not involve a specific site, development project, or focused geographic area, does not change permitted land use or density, and does not otherwise result in a physical change that could cause an impact to the environment.
DISCUSSION
The adoption of the proposed Resolution implements Local CEQA Guidelines, mandated by State Law.
SUMMARY/NEXT STEPS
The Planning Commission is recommending that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 9904 to adopt the City of Santa Fe Springs Local Guidelines Implementing CEQA.
ATTACHMENT(S):
A. Attachment A – Resolution No. 9904
a. Exhibit A – Local CEQA Guidelines
B. Attachment B – Planning Commission Staff Report – April 8, 2024 APPROVED:
ITEM NO.:
RESOLUTION NO. 9904
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS
ADOPTING LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
WHEREAS, State Law requires each city to adopt guidelines outlining its administrative review process used to implement the rules and regulations contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. and CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Code of California Regulations, Division 6, Chapter 3 §§ 15000 -15387); and
WHEREAS, the Local CEQA Guidelines supplement the States CEQA Guidelines and provide a structure and process for City specific implementation of the rules and regulations contained in CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its meeting on April 8, 2024, reviewed the proposed Local CEQA Guidelines and recommended that the City Council approve their adoption.
WHEREAS, the City Council, at its meeting on May 7, 2024, approved the proposed Local CEQA Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. FINDINGS
The Local CEQA Guidelines play a pivotal role in balancing environmental protection with local development needs, all while promoting public engagement and adherence to legal standards.
SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION
Adoption of the Local CEQA Guidelines is categorically exempt from the provisions of the CEQA per CEQA Guidelines Section 15308 (Class 8 – Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment) because it involves an adoption of Local CEQA Guidelines. It does not involve a specific site, development project, or focused geographic area, does not change permitted land use or density, and does not otherwise result in a physical change that could cause an impact on the environment.
SECTION 3. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning Commission hereby adopts Resolution No. 261-2024 recommending to the City Council to find that the Local CEQA Guidelines are exempt pursuant to CEQA APPROVED:
ITEM NO.:
2 Guidelines, Section 15308 (Class 8 – Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment), and to adopt the City of Santa Fe Springs Local Guidelines Implementing CEQA.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7
th day of May, 2024 by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Jay Sarno, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Fernando Muñoz, Deputy City Clerk
Exhibit A – Local CEQA Guidelines
EXHIBIT A – LOCAL CEQA GUIDELINES
GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR
IMPLEMENTING THE PROVISIONS OF THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
FOR PROJECTS IN THE CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS
SECTION 1 PURPOSE
These Guidelines and Procedures (“Guidelines”) are adopted to implement the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines (“State Guidelines”), 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq., and may be referred to as the Santa Fe Springs CEQA Procedures.
SECTION 2 RELATIONSHIP TO STATE GUIDELINES
The State Guidelines are hereby incorporated by reference. These Guidelines are not meant to replace the State Guidelines but to implement, supplement and tailor the general provisions of the State Guidelines to the specific operations of the City of Santa Fe Springs (“City”). The City Council is the governing board of the City. The City may administer its responsibilities under CEQA in any manner which meets the requirements of CEQA, notwithstanding the specific procedures and provisions set forth in these Guidelines; provided, however, that when such procedures and provision are not followed, the City Council, shall, by minute action, find that extraordinary circumstances exist and that such procedures and provisions are waived. The City Council shall be the only CEQA decisionmaking body as specified in these Guidelines with the ability to waive the procedures and provisions contained herein. If any Sections of these Guidelines are in conflict with or contrary to any provision of the State Guidelines as they now exist or may be amended hereafter, the State Guidelines shall control.
SECTION 3 DEFINITIONS
The definitions set forth in the Public Resources Code section 21060 et. seq. and the State Guidelines shall govern and are the applicable definitions except as modified and/or supplemented herein.
Advisory Body - The person, committee, or commission, which has authority by law or ordinance to comment upon or give an advisory decision on the Project at issue. For the City the Advisory Body may include but is not limited to a Director and the City Planning Commission.
CEQA Document – The CEQA Document prepared for a particular Project which can include but is not limited to a Notice of Exemption, a Negative Declaration, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, or an Environmental Impact Report.
City - The City of Santa Fe Springs, a California municipal corporation. 2 City Council – The Legislative Body for the City of Santa Fe Springs and the final Decision-Making Body as set forth in these Guidelines.
City Planning Commission – A Commission of the City Council created pursuant to the Chapter 32 of the Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code and governed by Chapter 155 of the Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code.
Decision-Making Body – The person, commission, or council which has the authority by law or ordinance to make a final decision to approve or disapprove a Project at issue. The Decision-Making Body, depending on the CEQA document, is a Director, the City Planning Commission, and/or the City Council.
Department – The department in the City that is carrying out a Project.
Director – The director of the department in the City, or his/her designee, responsible for CEQA functions on a particular Project.
Lead Agency – The City of Santa Fe Springs.
Project – Any action as defined by State Guidelines §15378.
SECTION 4 RESPONSIBILITY OF DEPARTMENTS AND DEPARTMENT
DIRECTORS
A. Private Projects. For all private Projects the Community Development Department (“CDD”) shall be responsible for the handling and processing of all CEQA Documents as follows:
1. Prepare the CEQA documents or retain, at the applicants expense, outside consultants to prepare the CEQA document.
2. Upon completion of the CEQA Document submit to the appropriate Decision-Making Body for final action.
B. Public Agency Projects. Each Department shall each be responsible for the preparation, review and/or processing of CEQA Documents as follows:
1. The Directors of the Department for which a Project is undertaken shall:
a. Conduct the environmental review process in conjunction with these Guidelines and CDD, including the preparation of the CEQA Documents; or
b. Retain the services of an outside consultant to perform the environmental review, subject to these Guidelines.
3 2. Upon completion of the CEQA Document, submit to the appropriate Decision-Making Body as set forth in these Guidelines.
SECTION 5 INITIAL PROCESS
A. Purpose. The CEQA process is an informational process involving a series of procedural and substantive steps to determine if CEQA applies to a given activity, and if CEQA applies, to identify potential environmental impacts and methods of mitigating such impacts.
B. Steps.
1. Determine if an activity, proposal, or action meets the definition of a “Project” pursuant to CEQA (Guidelines §15378). If it does not meet the definition of a Project no further action under CEQA is required.
2. If the activity is a Project, determine if the Project is either statutorily or categorically exempt from further CEQA review, or is deemed ministerial and not subject to further CEQA review.
3. If the Project is exempt, no further CEQA review is required and a Notice of Exemption is prepared and filed pursuant to State Guidelines (Guidelines §15062).
4. If a Project is not exempt then an Initial Study shall be prepared to describe and evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the Project.
5. The Initial Study will lead to either the preparation of a Negative Declaration, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, or an Environmental Impact Report.
SECTION 6. EXEMPTIONS
A. Exemptions Generally. Projects that are ministerial in nature, meet general rule findings, are statutorily exempt, are categorically exempt, or are denied do not require the preparation of an Initial Study, Negative/Mitigated Negative Declaration, or an Environmental Impact Report.
B. Ministerial Projects. A ministerial Project involves little or no personal judgement by the City and involves only the use of fixed standards or objective measurements and no personal, subjective judgement can be used in deciding if a Project can be carried out (State CEQA Guidelines §15269). Appendix A contains the list of Projects in the City that the City Council has found to be ministerial in nature. However, when a Project involves elements, some of which are ministerial in nature and some of which are discretionary, the overall Project will be deemed discretionary and subject to CEQA review. 4 C. General Rule. CEQA does not apply to a Project where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment (State Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).
D. Statutory Exemptions. Those exemptions granted by the State legislature and are listed in State Guidelines §§ 15260 through 15285, as may be amended from time to time.
E. Categorical Exemptions. Those classes of Projects which the State Guidelines have determined typically do not have a significant impact on the environment (State Guidelines §§ 15300-15333). In addition, pursuant to § 15300.4 of the State Guidelines, the City hereby adds the activities and permits listed in Appendix B to the list of Class Numbers 1, 3, 4, and 5 activities that are categorically exempt in the City.
F. Categorical Exemption Limitation. A categorical exemption shall not be used if the conditions in State Guidelines § 15300.2 apply.
G. Notice of Exemption. If a Project is exempt under one of the categories listed above, then a Notice of Exemption may be filed following the procedures and requirements of California Public Resources Code § 21152 and State Guidelines § 15062 as follows:
1. The Notice shall include a brief description of the Project, the location of the Project, a finding that the Project is exempt citing to the sections or statutes of the exemptions and the justifications for the exemptions, the applicant’s name and the identity of the person undertaking the Project.
2. The Notice shall be filled with the State Clearinghouse and County Clerk, after approval of the Project
SECTION 7. INITIAL STUDIES
A. Determination that an Initial Study should be Prepared. If a Project is subject to the requirements of CEQA and not exempt under the State Guidelines, the Director shall initiate an Initial Study to determine if the Project may have a significant effect on the environment. If the Director determines that an Environmental Impact Report will be required for the Project, an Initial Study is not required but may still be made if determined to be desirable. If it is determined that an Initial Study is required for a Project, all phases of Project planning, implementation, and operation shall be considered. An Initial Study or similar analysis prepared pursuant to NEPA may be used to meet the requirements of this Section.
B. Elements. The elements of an Initial Study shall follow Appendix G of the State Guidelines.
5 C. Results of Initial Study. The Initial Study shall be used to provide a written determination of whether a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared for a Project.
SECTION 8 NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS OR MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATIONS
A. Determination to Prepare a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Director shall direct the preparation of a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Project based on the following circumstances.
1. Negative Declaration. The Initial Study, in light of the whole record, shows there is no substantial evidence that the Project may have a significant effect on the environment.
2. Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but revisions in the Project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is released for public review would avoid or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and there is no substantial evidence before the Director that the Project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment.
B. Procedures. A Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration shall follow the State Guidelines as to required content (State Guidelines §15071).
C. Notice of Intent to Adopt. Prior to the adoption of a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, a Notice of Intent to Adopt shall be filed pursuant to State Guidelines §15072. The Notice shall be mailed to responsible agencies, trustee agencies and to those organizations and individuals who have requested, in writing, to receive such notice. In addition, the Notice shall also be given pursuant to § 155.860 thru § 155.863 of the Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code for Projects requiring a public hearing and in one of the following manners:
1. Publication at least once in the in the paper of general circulation within the project area.
2. Posting the notice on and off the site in the area where the Project is located.
3. Direct mailing to the owners and occupants of property contiguous to the Project. The owners are identified by the latest equalized assessment roll.
In addition, the Notice shall be filed with the County Clerk. For a Project of statewide, regional or areawide significance, notice is provided to transportation planning agencies and public agencies which have transportation facilities within the jurisdiction which could 6 be affected by the Project. Public transit agencies with facilities within one-half mile of the Project should also receive notice.
If the City has received a written notification by the U.S. Department of Defense or any branch of the U.S. Armed forces of the specific boundaries of a low-level flight path, military impact zone, or special use airspace and they have provided the City with the military contact office and address, then that military office shall be included in the list of organizations to receive notice (State Guideline §15190.5).
D. Public Review. For Projects that do not require submittal to the State Clearinghouse, there is a minimum of 20-day public review and comment period. If submitted to the State Clearinghouse, then there is a minimum of 30-day public review and comment period (State Guidelines § 15073).
E. Adoption of a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration (Private Projects). Prior to approval of a Project, the Planning Commission shall consider the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process. After review by the Planning Commission, the Project and the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, and any recommendation thereto, may be adopted, approved or disapproved.
F. Public Agency Projects. For all Public Agency Projects the process shall be the same as above for a private Project.
G. Mitigation Monitoring Program/Plan. In conjunction with adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Planning Commission shall adopt a program of monitoring to ensure that the required mitigation measures are implemented (State Guidelines § 15074).
H. Notice of Determination. Within five working days after the Planning Commission has made a decision to carry out or approve a Project, the Director shall cause to be prepared and filed a Notice of Determination pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21152 and State Guidelines § 15075. The Notice of Determination shall be filed with the State Clearinghouse and the County Clerk.
I. Federal Projects - For Projects where federal involvement might require the preparation of a finding of no significant effect, the State Guidelines shall be followed in addition to the procedures set forth in this Section.
SECTION 9 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS
A. Significant Impacts. When the Director determines that a Project may have a significant impact on the environment, the Director shall direct the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Project. The Project applicant shall provide any information requested for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. In connection with the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report, the procedures contained in this Section and the State Guidelines shall be followed (§§15120 – 15132). 7 B. Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report
1. One of the following methods or a combination of them may be used for preparing an Environmental Impact Report:
a. Contracting with another entity, public or private, to prepare the Environmental Impact Report.
b. Accepting an Environmental Impact Report prepared by a consultant, and paid by the applicant, or any other person. c. Using a previously prepared Environmental Impact Report.
2. The Environmental Impact Report shall be reviewed and analyzed by CDD before it is sent out for public review to ensure its accuracy, objectivity and completeness. The Environmental Impact Report shall also reflect the independent judgment of the City.
3. CDD may require the applicant to supply data, technical studies, and information to assist in preparing the Environmental Impact Report. The applicant shall also be required to identify any other public agencies that will have jurisdiction by law over the Project.
4. The applicant shall pay an Environmental Impact Report processing fee established by City Council resolution and shall pay the actual costs of preparing and printing the Environmental Impact Report.
C. Notice of Preparation. A Notice of Preparation (NOP) (State Guidelines § 15082) notifying responsible and interested agencies about the Project and soliciting their comments on the scope and content of the Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared by CDD. This notice shall be sent by certified mail to the applicant, all responsible and trustee agencies, and all federal agencies involved in approving or funding the Project. The NOP shall also be sent to the State Clearinghouse and the County Clerk. Those receiving the NOP have 30 days in which to provide comments regarding the Environmental Impact Report preparation for the Project.
If the City has received a written notification by the U.S. Department of Defense or any branch of the U.S. Armed forces of the specific boundaries of a low-level flight path, military impact zone, or special use airspace and they have provided the City with the military contact office and address, then that military office shall receive notice the NOP (State Guideline §15190.5).
D. Scoping Meeting. The City may decide to hold a scoping meeting prior to the preparation of an Environment Impact Report. However, for Projects of statewide, regional 8 or areawide significance, or that may affect a highway or other facility under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation, at least one scoping meeting shall occur.
Notice for a scoping meeting shall be given as follows:
1. Any county or city that borders the City.
2. Any responsible agency.
3. Any public agency that has jurisdiction by law with respect to the Project.
4. Any organization or individual who has filed a written request for the notice.
E. Form and Content of an Environmental Impact Report - The required contents of an Environmental Impact Report as set forth in the State Guidelines §§ 15120 - 15132 shall be followed.
F. Notice of Completion. As soon as an Environmental Impact Report is completed, the Director shall file a Notice of Completion in printed form or electronically with the Office of Planning and Research. The Notice of Completion shall include all required information and be filed pursuant to State Guidelines § 15085. The Notice of Completion shall include:
1. A brief description of the Project.
2. The location of the Project either by street address and cross street for urban areas, or by attaching a map, as set forth in State Guidelines § 15085.
3. Address where copies of the draft Environmental Impact Report are available.
4. The review period during which comments will be received.
G. Notice of Availability. A Notice of Availability of a completed Environmental Impact Report shall be provided at the same time as the Notice of Completion is sent to the Office of Planning and Research. The Notice of Availability shall be prepared and posted as prescribed in the State Guidelines (§ 15087), shall be mailed to the last known address of all organizations and individuals who had previously requested such notice and shall be provided and in one of the following manners:
1. Publication at least once in the paper of general circulation within the project area.
2. Posting the notice on and off the site in the area where the Project is located.
3. Direct mailing to the owners and occupants of property contiguous to the Project. The owners are identified by the latest equalized assessment roll. 9 The Notice of Availability shall include:
1. Brief description of the Project.
2. Starting and ending dates of the review period.
3. The date, time, and place of any scheduled public meetings or hearings to be held by the lead agency.
4. A list of the significant environmental effects anticipated as a result of the Project.
5. The address where copies of the Environmental Impact Report and all documents incorporated by reference will be available for public review.
The location shall be readily accessible during the lead agency’s normal working hours. Copies of the draft Environmental Impact Report should be provided to the public library serving the area involved.
6. The presence of the Project site on any lists enumerated under Government Code §65962.5 (hazardous waste sites).
H. Public Review of an Environmental Impact Report. Upon the filing of a Notice of Completion, CDD shall submit copies of the Draft Environmental Impact Report to each responsible agency, trustee agency and any other public agency having jurisdiction by law with respect to the Project. Copies of the Environmental Impact Report shall also be made available for purchase by members of the general public. Any person obtaining a copy of the Draft Environmental Impact Report shall reimburse the Public Agency for its reproduction pursuant to the fees established by City Council resolution. Copies of the Draft Environmental Impact Report shall also be available at the Santa Fe Springs City Library and at City Hall.
The public review period for an Environmental Impact Report shall not be less than 30 days nor should it be longer than 60 days except under unusual circumstances. If the Environmental Impact Report is submitted to the State Clearinghouse for review, the review period shall not be less than 45 days.
I. Responses to Comments. In addition to any and all requirements of the State Guidelines, CDD shall ensure that all comments received regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report ae evaluated and responded to. The CDD shall provide a written proposed response to any public agency on comments made by that public agency at least 10 days prior to certifying the Environmental Impact Report (State Guidelines § 15088).
10 J. City Planning Commission Recommendations on Draft EIR. At a public hearing, the City Planning Commission shall review the Draft EIR for all Projects (private and public) and shall make recommendations to the City Council regarding the following items:
1. Whether the Draft EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and
2. Whether the EIR should be certified.
K. Preparation of Final Environmental Impact Report. Prior to the public hearing before the City Council, it shall be the responsibility of CDD to cause to be prepared a Final Environmental Impact Report. The contents of a Final Environmental Impact Report shall consist of:
1. The Draft Environmental Impact Report or a revision of the draft.
2. Comments and recommendations received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report either verbatim or in summary.
3. A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft Environmental Impact Report.
4. The responses of the City to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process.
5. Responses to comments received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report.
6. Any other information added by the City (State Guidelines § 15132).
L. Certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report. The City Council shall review the Final Environmental Impact Report. The Final Environmental Impact Report shall be presented to the City Council, together with the Draft Environmental Impact Report.
Prior to approving the Project, the City Council shall certify that:
1. The Final Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with CEQA;
2. The Final Environmental Impact Report was presented to them, and that they reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report prior to approving the Project; and,
3. The Final Environmental Impact Report reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis.
11 M. Findings. The City Council, in the certification of the Environmental Impact Report, shall identify one or more significant environmental effects of the Project unless it makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings set forth in the State Guidelines § 15091 include:
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report.
2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the Public Agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency.
3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or Project alternatives identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report.
N. Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program - In conjunction with adoption of an Environmental Impact Report, the City Council shall adopt a program of monitoring to ensure that the required mitigation measures are implemented (State Guidelines § 15097).
O. Statement of Overriding Considerations. For any impact that cannot be reduced to less than significant, a Statement of Overriding Consideration shall be adopted pursuant to the State Guidelines § 15093. The City Council shall balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including region-wide or statewide environmental benefits, of a Project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the Project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including region-wide or statewide environmental benefits, of a Project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered acceptable. The findings shall be in writing and set forth the specific reasons to support its action based on the Final Environmental Impact Report and/or other information in the record.
P. Notice of Determination - When the City has decided to carry out or approve a Project, the Director shall cause to be prepared a Notice of Determination and within five working days, shall file the Notice of Determination with the State Clearinghouse and County Clerk. The Notice of Determination shall include those items specified in the State Guidelines § 15094 as follows:
1. Identification of the Project including any Project title used in the Draft Environmental Impact Report.
12 2. Location of the Project either by street address and cross street for urban areas, or by attaching a map as set forth in State Guidelines § 15085.
3. The State Clearing Housing identification number.
4. A brief description of the Project.
5. The City as the lead agency.
6. The date on which the City approved the Project.
7. The applicant’s name.
8. The determination of the lead agency whether the Project, as approved, will have a significant effect on the environment.
9. A statement that the Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
10. Whether mitigation measures were made a condition of approval and whether a mitigation monitoring program was adopted.
11. Whether findings were made pursuant to State Guidelines §15091.
12. Whether a statement of overriding considerations was adopted.
13. The address where a copy of the Final Environmental Impact Report and record of Project approval may be examined.
14. If different from the applicant, the identity of the person undertraining the Project.
SECTION 10 APPEALS
A. Appeals. - Any decision by the Director or City Planning Commission on a Negative Declaration, or Mitigated Negative Declaration, may be appealed as set forth in Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code §§ 155.865-155.866. All actions of the City Council shall be final.
SECTION 11 AMENDMENTS TO THESE GUIDELINES
These Guidelines may be administratively amended by the City Attorney’s Office of the City of Santa Fe Springs without any further approval by the City Council, so as to conform to any changes in CEQA and/or the State Guidelines.
13 APPENDICES
Appendix A – Ministerially Exempt Projects
Appendix B – Additional Categorical Exempt Projects
14 APPENDIX A
MINISTERIALLY EXEMPT PROJECTS IN THE CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS Pursuant to Sections 15022 and 15268 of the State Guidelines issuance/approval of the following permits in the City shall be conclusively presumed to be ministerially exempt from the requirements of the CEQA and thus preparation of an environmental document is not required. However, where a project involves an approval that contains elements of both a ministerial action and a discretionary action, the project will be deemed discretionary and will be subject to the requirements of the CEQA.
Building and Related Permits:
1. Building and related permits, including driveways up to 300 feet (e.g., demolition, plumbing, electrical, solar panels, swimming pool).
2. Any permits for historic structures, as defined by the Secretary of Interior, are exempt only if the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings are met.
3. Any permits for a single-family residence, accessory dwelling unit, accessory structures, wall/fences or similar uses under Chapter 155 of the Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code.
Grading and Related Earth Disturbing Permits:
4. A grading permit that meets the following criteria:
(a) Is not located in an environmentally sensitive area; (b) Involves grading for construction of a single-family residence; and, (c) Does not result in a new driveway over 300 feet in length.
5. A stockpiling/grading permit up to four feet in height.
6. Structural Erosion Control measures and Best Management Plan (BMPs) processed in accordance with the requirements of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program and the Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code.
7. Revegetation plans.
Planning Permits:
8. Zone clearance application.
9. Fence permit.
10. Home occupation permit.
11. Sign permit (including directional, identification, temporary off-site and /or agricultural signs, and comprehensive sign plans).
12. Telecommunication facility minor modification application. 13 . Time Extension
15 Land Divisions:
14. Final subdivision maps.
15. A parcel map created pursuant to an Urban Lot Split.
16. Minor modifications and amendments to tentative tract and parcel maps.
17. Recorded map technical corrections.
18. Lot line adjustments involving four or fewer parcels, except when processed concurrently with a related application that is discretionary (e.g. variance, use permit).
19. Unconditional certificate of compliance.
20. Voluntary merger of parcels.
21. Record of survey map recording.
16 APPENDIX B
ADDITIONAL CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT PROJECTS IN THE CITY OF SANTA
FE SPRINGS
In addition to the exemptions contained in the State Guidelines, pursuant to Sections 15022(a)(1)(C) and 15300.4 of the State Guidelines the City has found that the following types of projects typically do not have a significant effect on the environment and therefore qualify for a categorical exemption under the class of categorical exemptions listed below:
Class 1: Existing Facilities [State Guidelines §15301]
1. Existing roads, streets, highways, bicycle and pedestrian paths, and appurtenant facilities. Repair, maintenance, reconstruction, replacement and minor expansion including, but not limited to:
(a) Reconstructing, resurfacing and/or seal coating of the pavement; (b) Paving existing unpaved shoulders;
(c) Widening the paved roadway by less than 10 feet or adding up to 4-footwide unpaved shoulders; (d) Adding short auxiliary lanes when required for localized purposes such as weaving, turning, lane changing or accelerating or decelerating; (e) Adding non-motorized trails and walkways parallel to the existing roadway to separate such non-motorized uses from motorized traffic; (f) Installing landscaping within road rights-of-way that involves minimal earth disturbing activities;
(g) Working on clear-span bridge structures, reconstructing existing stream crossings and making minor operational improvements to drainage facilities, provided that the construction of temporary stream bypasses is not involved;
(h) Modifying to improve existing roadside safety features such as curbs, pikes, headwalls, slopes and ditches within the right of way, adding or replacing devices such as fencing, guardrails, safety barriers, guideposts, and markers, or installing, removing, or modifying regulatory, warning, or informational signs;
(i) Adding, removing and/or replacing distinctive roadway, runway, or taxiway markings such as painted stripes, raised pavement markers thermoplastic, tape or raised bars; OR
(j) Abandoning dead-end roads when provisions for ongoing, long-term maintenance have been made or the road right-of-way has been returned to a natural state from a hydrologic standpoint.
2. Existing telecommunication facilities: Modification and renewal of the permits thereof.
17 3. Minor modifications to approved plans pursuant that do not require Planning Commission review.
4. Existing erosion control plans: Modification thereof when:
(a) The footprint of the area disturbed is not expanded; (b) The amount of sediment delivered from the site as calculated by a qualified professional is not increased; AND
(c) Groundwater use is not increased.
5. Tentative map revisions: Revisions to approved maps, including minor adjustments to access roads, that do not affect existing buildings.
6. Existing wells: Temporary cessation thereof.
Class 3: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures [State Guidelines §15303]
7. Construction and operation of small public/emergency service facilities, including public safety communication towers and power generators and buildings of less than 5,000 feet on less than 30% slopes involving less than 2,000 cubic yards of grading/excavation.
8. Wells: Installation and/or operation thereof pursuant to a groundwater permit when the amount of groundwater proposed to be used in total on the parcel is less than or equal to the amount of groundwater historically used (i.e., during the last 3 years).
Class 4: Minor Alterations to Land [State Guidelines §15304]
9. Park Facilities: Installation and operation of new or modification to existing park facilities that would:
(a) Disturb less than 5½ acres of land and have an average slope of 15% or less; AND
(b) Do not increase overall groundwater use on the parcel.
10. New access roads and driveways (longer than 300 feet and resulting in less than 2,000 cubic yards of grading) that would:
(a) Not disturb more than 2 acres of land;
(b) Not traverse slopes that are steeper than 29.9%; AND (c) Not discharge concentrated runoff within a stream setback area. 18 Class 5: Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations [State Guidelines §15305]
11. Zone Changes and General Plan Amendments: Implementation of Zone Changes and General Plan Amendments that do not increase the maximum intensity of land use allowed.
12. Parcel mergers: Implementation of parcel mergers pursuant to Chapter 154 of the Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code implementing the Subdivision Map Act.
13. Temporary public road closures: Closures for authorized temporary uses and special events.
14. Variances to standards for projects that are allowed by right under zoning.
15. Lot line adjustments involving four or fewer parcels, except when processed with a concurrent discretionary action under Chapter 155 of the Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code.
ITEM #_2__
CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STAFF REPORT
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Cuong Nguyen, Acting Director of Planning
BY: Vince Velasco, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA).
DATE: April 8, 2024
RECOMMENDATION(S):
It is recommended that the Planning Commission:
1) Find and determine that the project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15308 (Class 8 – Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 261-2024 to recommend that the City Council approve and adopt the City of Santa Fe Springs Local Guidelines Implementing CEQA; and
3) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the proposed Resolution, which implements local guidelines for implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), will not have any fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), enacted in 1970, is a landmark environmental law that mandates state and local agencies to assess the environmental impacts of proposed projects before approval. CEQA operates on the principle that informed decision-making requires a thorough understanding of a project's potential environmental impacts. As such, the act mandates that state and local agencies assess PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT– MEETING OF APRIL 8, 2024
the environmental effects of proposed projects before approving them. This evaluation process involves identifying significant environmental impacts, exploring alternatives and mitigation measures, and disclosing findings to the public. CEQA also requires local agencies to adopt their own set of policies and procedures to implement CEQA and its guidelines.
ANALYSIS
The Local CEQA Guidelines incorporate the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Code of California Regulations, Division 6, Chapter 3 §§ 15000 -15387) and provide procedural details and requirements for adhering to CEQA at the City level. These Local Guidelines delineate the procedural steps for the City, applicants, and the public, to follow. The Local CEQA Guidelines play a pivotal role in balancing environmental protection with local development needs, all while promoting public engagement and adherence to legal standards.
ENVIRONMENTAL
Adoption of the Local CEQA Guidelines is categorically exempt from the provisions of the CEQA per CEQA Guidelines Section 15308 (Class 8 – Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment) because it involves an adoption of Local CEQA Guidelines. It does not involve a specific site, development project, or focused geographic area, does not change permitted land use or density and does not otherwise result in a physical change that could cause an impact to the environment.
DISCUSSION
Authority of the Planning Commission
The adoption of the proposed Resolution implements Local CEQA Guidelines, mandated by State Law. The Planning Commission’s recommendations will be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration at a subsequent public meeting, tentatively scheduled for May 7, 2024.
SUMMARY
Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 261-2024 to recommend that the City Council adopt the City of Santa Fe Springs Local Guidelines Implementing CEQA.
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT– MEETING OF APRIL 8, 2024
ATTACHMENT(S):
A. Attachment A – Resolution No. 261-2024
Exhibit A – Local CEQA Guidelines
ITEM # 15
CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: René Bobadilla, P.E., City Manager
BY: James Enriquez, P.E., Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: POLICE SERVICES STAGING FACILITY STORM DAMAGE –
EMERGENCY REPAIRS UPDATE
DATE: May 7, 2024
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Pursuant to Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code Section 34.23 and California Public Contract Code Section 22050, by a four-fifths vote authorize continuing the repairs without competitive bidding; and
2) Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.
FISCAL IMPACT
Although the extent of the storm damage has been assessed, the total cost of the repair is not known at this time. Staff continues to solicit contractor proposals to complete the repair work as needed and as more information is gathered with respect to the needed repairs. The purchase orders executed to date are listed below. Staff will report at a future City Council meeting as further information develops and the complete scope of the repairs is determined and priced.
Expenses encumbered to date related to this emergency repair include:
Purchase Order #2240222: $43,610.60 for testing and construction demolition with Restoration Unlimited (Santa Fe Springs, CA)
Purchase Order #2240262: $115,680 for waterproofing with Innovative Painting & Waterproofing (Santa Fe Springs, CA)
BACKGROUND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024
Police Services Staging Facility Storm Damage – Emergency Repairs Update
The severe storms that hit Southern California the week of February 4, 2024, resulted in historic rainfall totals throughout the region, prompting Governor Newsom to proclaim a state of emergency in various counties, including Los Angeles. The County of Los Angeles followed with the proclamation of a local state of emergency.
The intense and prolonged rainfall caused significant flooding of the City’s Police Services Staging Facility located adjacent to the Municipal Services Yard. Flooding was experienced in both the Men’s and Women’s Locker Rooms and Restroom/Showers as well as the adjacent gym. The flooding rendered these areas uninhabitable and in need of repairs before the space can be reoccupied.
Public Works maintenance staff worked throughout the storms to sweep and vacuum the water to minimize the extent of the flooding, but were ultimately unable to keep up with the volume of water entering the building from the rear wall adjacent to the railroad rightof-way. Eventually, maintenance crews ceased water removal and began removing gym equipment and mats so that the source of the flooding could be more easily identified.
Although one location was identified where the majority of the water was entering the building, the extent of the flooding has saturated the walls in a significant portion of the facility. Under the City Manager’s authority pursuant to Santa Fe Springs Municipal Code Section 34.23, staff continues to negotiate with contractors to provide various services to repair the damage.
The first step in the repair process required demolition work to assess the full extent of the damage and expose the source of the flooding in order to develop a repairs to prevent future flooding.
Staff contracted with Restoration Unlimited (Santa Fe Springs, CA) for the initial testing and demolition work. Sampling for preconstruction testing was conducted on March 6.
Based on testing results, demolition was started on March 18, exposing the likely source of the rainwater intrusion. Staff solicited proposals from two waterproofing contractors.
Waterproofing must be completed before restoration work to prevent further water damage. The proposal from Innovative Painting & Waterproofing, LLC (Santa Fe Springs) was selected and a purchase order was executed.
A Right-of-Entry permit is required from BNSF Rail Road in order to complete the waterproofing work. The permit application is currently under review by BNSF. The waterproofing work will be scheduled once the permit is issued and is anticipated to be completed within two weeks following permit issuance. The restoration of the interior finishes will commence once the waterproofing is completed.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024
Police Services Staging Facility Storm Damage – Emergency Repairs Update
ENVIRONMENTAL
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION
Staff has been in close communication with the City Manager of the City of Whittier and police administration since the flooding began. Given the extent of the flooding, the City of Whittier provided notice on February 7, 2024, that they would temporarily vacate the facility until permanent repairs are completed. Limited staff and equipment was temporarily relocated to the City’s Police Services Building on Jersey Avenue and the majority of the patrol operations were moved to the Whittier Police Station. The Police Staging building was vacated on February 26, 2024.
Repairs are currently estimated to be completed in 2 to 3 months. It should also be noted that this assumes all repairs are completed as an emergency, without competitive bidding.
Competitive bidding would require the solicitation of services by an architect to develop plans and specifications. The solicitation process and the time to develop documents could add an additional 9 to 12 months to the schedule.
SUMMARY/NEXT STEPS
Upon the approval of the City Council of the recommended actions, City staff will continue to coordinate the emergency repairs of the facility. Pursuant to the Public Contract Code Section 22050, staff will provide updated reports at subsequent City Council meetings as the situation develops, more information is gathered, and a plan of action for the repairs is determined and scheduled.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
ITEM # 16
CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: René Bobadilla, P.E., City Manager
BY: Chad Van Meeteren, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL FOR FIRE-RESCUE
APPARATUS COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO EVALUATE A POTENTIAL
APPARATUS REPLACEMENT VENDOR
DATE: May 7, 2024
RECOMMENDATION(S):
It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Approve out-of-state travel in the month of May for four Fire – Rescue staff members to travel to SVI Trucks located in Fort Collins, Colorado; and 2) Take such additional, related, action that may be desirable.
FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact to the City. SVI Trucks will cover 100% of the travel expenses, including airfare, accommodations, and meals for the duration of the visit. As such, there is no financial impact to the City for this travel.
BACKGROUND
The City of Santa Fe Springs Fire - Rescue Department is currently operating with a 1997 Spartan, Super Vac hazardous materials emergency response apparatus. This critical piece of equipment has served our community effectively; however, it is aging and nearing the end of its operational lifecycle. In anticipation of future needs and in alignment with our commitment to maintaining high standards of safety and efficiency, it has become necessary to explore options for its replacement.
To ensure the selection of the most suitable and technologically advanced replacement, the department proposes a visit to SVI Trucks in Fort Collins, Colorado. SVI Trucks is CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024
Request for Out-Of-State Travel for Fire – Rescue Apparatus Committee Members to Evaluate a Potential Apparatus Replacement Vendor
renowned for its specialization in custom-built emergency response vehicles, including those equipped for hazardous materials handling. The visit will allow our apparatus committee members to assess the capabilities and features of potential replacements firsthand and to discuss customization options that would meet our specific operational needs.
The objective of this visit is to conduct a thorough evaluation of SVI Trucks’ offerings to determine if they align with our operational requirements and safety standards. This proactive approach ensures that our Fire - Rescue Department continues to operate with the best possible equipment, thereby enhancing our ability to respond to hazardous material incidents effectively and safely.
ANALYSIS
N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL
N/A
DISCUSSION
N/A
SUMMARY/NEXT STEPS
Upon the approval of the City Council of the recommended action, Fire – Rescue staff will initiate coordination with SVI Trucks to arrange all aspects of the planned visit to their facilities in Fort Collins, Colorado.
ATTACHMENT(S):
None.
ITEM STATUS:
APPROVED:
DENIED:
TABLED:
DIRECTION GIVEN: