Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.6406
0.3886
4.6439
0.0155
1.7884
0.0134
1.8018
0.4743
0.0123
0.4866
1,545.286
0 1,545.286
0 0.0376
1,546.226
2 Total
0.6406
0.3886
4.6439
0.0155
1.7884
0.0134
1.8018
0.4743
0.0123
0.4866
1,545.286
0 1,545.286
0 0.0376
1,546.226
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.6406
0.3886
4.6439
0.0155
1.7884
0.0134
1.8018
0.4743
0.0123
0.4866
1,545.286
0 1,545.286
0 0.0376
1,546.226
2 Total
0.6406
0.3886
4.6439
0.0155
1.7884
0.0134
1.8018
0.4743
0.0123
0.4866
1,545.286
0 1,545.286
0 0.0376
1,546.226
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 Unmitigated
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
145.75
154.25
154.00
506,227
506,227
Apartments Mid Rise
4,026.75
3,773.25
4075.50
13,660,065
13,660,065
General Office Building
288.45
62.55 31.05
706,812
706,812
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
2,368.80
2,873.52
2817.72
3,413,937
3,413,937
Hotel
192.00
187.50
160.00
445,703
445,703
Quality Restaurant
501.12
511.92
461.20
707,488
707,488
Regional Shopping Center
528.08
601.44
357.84
1,112,221
1,112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 General Office Building
16.60 8.40
6.90 33.00
48.00 19.00
77 19
4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40
6.90 8.50
72.50 19.00
37 20
43 Hotel
16.60 8.40
6.90 19.40
61.60 19.00
58 38
4 Quality Restaurant
16.60 8.40
6.90 12.00
69.00 19.00
38 18
44 Regional Shopping Center
16.60 8.40
6.90 16.30
64.70 19.00
54 35
11 5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Apartments Mid Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
General Office Building
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Hotel
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Quality Restaurant
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Regional Shopping Center
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4769.72
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5057.75
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
251.616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1.11916
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35.7843
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1.28342
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22.7599
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4.76972
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5.05775
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
0.251616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
45.00 1000sqft
1.03 45,000.00
0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
36.00 1000sqft
0.83 36,000.00
0 Hotel
50.00 Room
1.67 72,600.00
0 Quality Restaurant
8.00 1000sqft
0.18 8,000.00
0 Apartments Low Rise
25.00 Dwelling Unit
1.56 25,000.00
72 Apartments Mid Rise
975.00
Dwelling Unit
25.66 975,000.00
2789
Regional Shopping Center
56.00 1000sqft
1.29 56,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)
2.2 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2028
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44
0.029
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
NumberWood
1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
158.37
79.82 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
131.84
78.27 tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
127.15
65.80 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2021
0.1704
1.8234
1.1577
2.3800e-
003
0.4141
0.0817
0.4958
0.1788
0.0754
0.2542
0.0000
210.7654
210.7654
0.0600
0.0000
212.2661
2022
0.5865
4.0240
5.1546
0.0155
0.9509
0.1175
1.0683
0.2518
0.1103
0.3621
0.0000
1,418.655
4 1,418.655
4 0.1215
0.0000
1,421.692
5 2023
0.5190
3.2850
4.7678
0.0147
0.8497
0.0971
0.9468
0.2283
0.0912
0.3195
0.0000
1,342.441
2 1,342.441
2 0.1115
0.0000
1,345.229
1 2024
4.1592
0.1313
0.2557
5.0000e-
004
0.0221
6.3900e-
003
0.0285
5.8700e-
003
5.9700e-
003
0.0118
0.0000
44.6355
44.6355
7.8300e-
003
0.0000
44.8311
Maximum
4.1592
4.0240
5.1546
0.0155
0.9509
0.1175
1.0683
0.2518
0.1103
0.3621
0.0000
1,418.655
4 1,418.655
4 0.1215
0.0000
1,421.692
5 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2021
0.1704
1.8234
1.1577
2.3800e-
003
0.4141
0.0817
0.4958
0.1788
0.0754
0.2542
0.0000
210.7651
210.7651
0.0600
0.0000
212.2658
2022
0.5865
4.0240
5.1546
0.0155
0.9509
0.1175
1.0683
0.2518
0.1103
0.3621
0.0000
1,418.655
0 1,418.655
0 0.1215
0.0000
1,421.692
1 2023
0.5190
3.2850
4.7678
0.0147
0.8497
0.0971
0.9468
0.2283
0.0912
0.3195
0.0000
1,342.440
9 1,342.440
9 0.1115
0.0000
1,345.228
7 2024
4.1592
0.1313
0.2557
5.0000e-
004
0.0221
6.3900e-
003
0.0285
5.8700e-
003
5.9700e-
003
0.0118
0.0000
44.6354
44.6354
7.8300e-
003
0.0000
44.8311
Maximum
4.1592
4.0240
5.1546
0.0155
0.9509
0.1175
1.0683
0.2518
0.1103
0.3621
0.0000
1,418.655
0 1,418.655
0 0.1215
0.0000
1,421.692
1 Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 9-1-2021
11-30-2021
1.4091
1.4091
2 12-1-2021
2-28-2022
1.3329
1.3329
3 3-1-2022
5-31-2022
1.1499
1.1499
4 6-1-2022
8-31-2022
1.1457
1.1457
5 9-1-2022
11-30-2022
1.1415
1.1415
6 12-1-2022
2-28-2023
1.0278
1.0278
7 3-1-2023
5-31-2023
0.9868
0.9868
8 6-1-2023
8-31-2023
0.9831
0.9831
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6700e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Energy
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
3,896.073
2 3,896.073
2 0.1303
0.0468
3,913.283
3 Mobile
1.5857
7.9962
19.1834
0.0821
7.7979
0.0580
7.8559
2.0895
0.0539
2.1434
0.0000
7,620.498
6 7,620.498
6 0.3407
0.0000
7,629.016
2 Waste
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
207.8079
0.0000
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Water
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
29.1632
556.6420
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Total
6.8692
9.5223
30.3407
0.0914
7.7979
0.2260
8.0240
2.0895
0.2219
2.3114
236.9712
12,294.18
07 12,531.15
19 15.7904
0.1260
12,963.47
51 Unmitigated Operational
9 9-1-2023
11-30-2023
0.9798
0.9798
10 12-1-2023
2-29-2024
2.8757
2.8757
11 3-1-2024
5-31-2024
1.6188
1.6188
Highest
2.8757
2.8757
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6700e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Energy
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
3,896.073
2 3,896.073
2 0.1303
0.0468
3,913.283
3 Mobile
1.5857
7.9962
19.1834
0.0821
7.7979
0.0580
7.8559
2.0895
0.0539
2.1434
0.0000
7,620.498
6 7,620.498
6 0.3407
0.0000
7,629.016
2 Waste
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
207.8079
0.0000
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Water
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
29.1632
556.6420
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Total
6.8692
9.5223
30.3407
0.0914
7.7979
0.2260
8.0240
2.0895
0.2219
2.3114
236.9712
12,294.18
07 12,531.15
19 15.7904
0.1260
12,963.47
51 Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
9/1/2021
10/12/2021
5 30
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
10/13/2021
11/9/2021
5 20
3 Grading
Grading
11/10/2021
1/11/2022
5 45
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
1/12/2022
12/12/2023
5 500
5 Paving
Paving
12/13/2023
1/30/2024
5 35
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
1/31/2024
3/19/2024
5 35
OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
±
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158
0.38 Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158
0.38 Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187
0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247
0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367
0.48 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231
0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130
0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132
0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
0.0496
0.0000
0.0496
7.5100e-
003
0.0000
7.5100e-
003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.0475
0.4716
0.3235
5.8000e-
004
0.0233
0.0233
0.0216
0.0216
0.0000
51.0012
51.0012
0.0144
0.0000
51.3601
Total
0.0475
0.4716
0.3235
5.8000e-
004
0.0496
0.0233
0.0729
7.5100e-
003
0.0216
0.0291
0.0000
51.0012
51.0012
0.0144
0.0000
51.3601
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00
0.00 458.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 801.00
143.00
0.00 10.00
6.90 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 160.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
1.9300e-
003
0.0634
0.0148
1.8000e-
004
3.9400e-
003
1.9000e-
004
4.1300e-
003
1.0800e-
003
1.8000e-
004
1.2600e-
003
0.0000
17.4566
17.4566
1.2100e-
003
0.0000
17.4869
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
7.2000e-
004
5.3000e-
004
6.0900e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6900e-
003
4.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.6000e-
004
0.0000
1.5281
1.5281
5.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.5293
Total
2.6500e-
003
0.0639
0.0209
2.0000e-
004
5.6200e-
003
2.0000e-
004
5.8200e-
003
1.5300e-
003
1.9000e-
004
1.7200e-
003
0.0000
18.9847
18.9847
1.2600e-
003
0.0000
19.0161
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
0.0496
0.0000
0.0496
7.5100e-
003
0.0000
7.5100e-
003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.0475
0.4716
0.3235
5.8000e-
004
0.0233
0.0233
0.0216
0.0216
0.0000
51.0011
51.0011
0.0144
0.0000
51.3600
Total
0.0475
0.4716
0.3235
5.8000e-
004
0.0496
0.0233
0.0729
7.5100e-
003
0.0216
0.0291
0.0000
51.0011
51.0011
0.0144
0.0000
51.3600
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
1.9300e-
003
0.0634
0.0148
1.8000e-
004
3.9400e-
003
1.9000e-
004
4.1300e-
003
1.0800e-
003
1.8000e-
004
1.2600e-
003
0.0000
17.4566
17.4566
1.2100e-
003
0.0000
17.4869
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
7.2000e-
004
5.3000e-
004
6.0900e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6900e-
003
4.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.6000e-
004
0.0000
1.5281
1.5281
5.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.5293
Total
2.6500e-
003
0.0639
0.0209
2.0000e-
004
5.6200e-
003
2.0000e-
004
5.8200e-
003
1.5300e-
003
1.9000e-
004
1.7200e-
003
0.0000
18.9847
18.9847
1.2600e-
003
0.0000
19.0161
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
0.1807
0.0000
0.1807
0.0993
0.0000
0.0993
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.0389
0.4050
0.2115
3.8000e-
004
0.0204
0.0204
0.0188
0.0188
0.0000
33.4357
33.4357
0.0108
0.0000
33.7061
Total
0.0389
0.4050
0.2115
3.8000e-
004
0.1807
0.0204
0.2011
0.0993
0.0188
0.1181
0.0000
33.4357
33.4357
0.0108
0.0000
33.7061
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
5.8000e-
004
4.3000e-
004
4.8700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.3400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.3500e-
003
3.6000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.7000e-
004
0.0000
1.2225
1.2225
4.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.2234
Total
5.8000e-
004
4.3000e-
004
4.8700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.3400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.3500e-
003
3.6000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.7000e-
004
0.0000
1.2225
1.2225
4.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.2234
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
0.1807
0.0000
0.1807
0.0993
0.0000
0.0993
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.0389
0.4050
0.2115
3.8000e-
004
0.0204
0.0204
0.0188
0.0188
0.0000
33.4357
33.4357
0.0108
0.0000
33.7060
Total
0.0389
0.4050
0.2115
3.8000e-
004
0.1807
0.0204
0.2011
0.0993
0.0188
0.1181
0.0000
33.4357
33.4357
0.0108
0.0000
33.7060
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
5.8000e-
004
4.3000e-
004
4.8700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.3400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.3500e-
003
3.6000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.7000e-
004
0.0000
1.2225
1.2225
4.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.2234
Total
5.8000e-
004
4.3000e-
004
4.8700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.3400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.3500e-
003
3.6000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.7000e-
004
0.0000
1.2225
1.2225
4.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.2234
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
0.1741
0.0000
0.1741
0.0693
0.0000
0.0693
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.0796
0.8816
0.5867
1.1800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0347
0.0347
0.0000
103.5405
103.5405
0.0335
0.0000
104.3776
Total
0.0796
0.8816
0.5867
1.1800e-
003
0.1741
0.0377
0.2118
0.0693
0.0347
0.1040
0.0000
103.5405
103.5405
0.0335
0.0000
104.3776
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.2200e-
003
9.0000e-
004
0.0103
3.0000e-
005
2.8300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.8600e-
003
7.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
7.8000e-
004
0.0000
2.5808
2.5808
8.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.5828
Total
1.2200e-
003
9.0000e-
004
0.0103
3.0000e-
005
2.8300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.8600e-
003
7.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
7.8000e-
004
0.0000
2.5808
2.5808
8.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.5828
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
0.1741
0.0000
0.1741
0.0693
0.0000
0.0693
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.0796
0.8816
0.5867
1.1800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0347
0.0347
0.0000
103.5403
103.5403
0.0335
0.0000
104.3775
Total
0.0796
0.8816
0.5867
1.1800e-
003
0.1741
0.0377
0.2118
0.0693
0.0347
0.1040
0.0000
103.5403
103.5403
0.0335
0.0000
104.3775
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.2200e-
003
9.0000e-
004
0.0103
3.0000e-
005
2.8300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.8600e-
003
7.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
7.8000e-
004
0.0000
2.5808
2.5808
8.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.5828
Total
1.2200e-
003
9.0000e-
004
0.0103
3.0000e-
005
2.8300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.8600e-
003
7.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
7.8000e-
004
0.0000
2.5808
2.5808
8.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.5828
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
0.0807
0.0000
0.0807
0.0180
0.0000
0.0180
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.0127
0.1360
0.1017
2.2000e-
004
5.7200e-
003
5.7200e-
003
5.2600e-
003
5.2600e-
003
0.0000
19.0871
19.0871
6.1700e-
003
0.0000
19.2414
Total
0.0127
0.1360
0.1017
2.2000e-
004
0.0807
5.7200e-
003
0.0865
0.0180
5.2600e-
003
0.0233
0.0000
19.0871
19.0871
6.1700e-
003
0.0000
19.2414
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.1000e-
004
1.5000e-
004
1.7400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
5.2000e-
004
0.0000
5.3000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
0.4587
0.4587
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.4590
Total
2.1000e-
004
1.5000e-
004
1.7400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
5.2000e-
004
0.0000
5.3000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
0.4587
0.4587
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.4590
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
0.0807
0.0000
0.0807
0.0180
0.0000
0.0180
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.0127
0.1360
0.1017
2.2000e-
004
5.7200e-
003
5.7200e-
003
5.2600e-
003
5.2600e-
003
0.0000
19.0871
19.0871
6.1700e-
003
0.0000
19.2414
Total
0.0127
0.1360
0.1017
2.2000e-
004
0.0807
5.7200e-
003
0.0865
0.0180
5.2600e-
003
0.0233
0.0000
19.0871
19.0871
6.1700e-
003
0.0000
19.2414
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.1000e-
004
1.5000e-
004
1.7400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
5.2000e-
004
0.0000
5.3000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
0.4587
0.4587
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.4590
Total
2.1000e-
004
1.5000e-
004
1.7400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
5.2000e-
004
0.0000
5.3000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
0.4587
0.4587
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.4590
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.2158
1.9754
2.0700
3.4100e-
003
0.1023
0.1023
0.0963
0.0963
0.0000
293.1324
293.1324
0.0702
0.0000
294.8881
Total
0.2158
1.9754
2.0700
3.4100e-
003
0.1023
0.1023
0.0963
0.0963
0.0000
293.1324
293.1324
0.0702
0.0000
294.8881
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0527
1.6961
0.4580
4.5500e-
003
0.1140
3.1800e-
003
0.1171
0.0329
3.0400e-
003
0.0359
0.0000
441.9835
441.9835
0.0264
0.0000
442.6435
Worker
0.3051
0.2164
2.5233
7.3500e-
003
0.7557
6.2300e-
003
0.7619
0.2007
5.7400e-
003
0.2065
0.0000
663.9936
663.9936
0.0187
0.0000
664.4604
Total
0.3578
1.9125
2.9812
0.0119
0.8696
9.4100e-
003
0.8790
0.2336
8.7800e-
003
0.2424
0.0000
1,105.977
1 1,105.977
1 0.0451
0.0000
1,107.103
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.2158
1.9754
2.0700
3.4100e-
003
0.1023
0.1023
0.0963
0.0963
0.0000
293.1321
293.1321
0.0702
0.0000
294.8877
Total
0.2158
1.9754
2.0700
3.4100e-
003
0.1023
0.1023
0.0963
0.0963
0.0000
293.1321
293.1321
0.0702
0.0000
294.8877
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0527
1.6961
0.4580
4.5500e-
003
0.1140
3.1800e-
003
0.1171
0.0329
3.0400e-
003
0.0359
0.0000
441.9835
441.9835
0.0264
0.0000
442.6435
Worker
0.3051
0.2164
2.5233
7.3500e-
003
0.7557
6.2300e-
003
0.7619
0.2007
5.7400e-
003
0.2065
0.0000
663.9936
663.9936
0.0187
0.0000
664.4604
Total
0.3578
1.9125
2.9812
0.0119
0.8696
9.4100e-
003
0.8790
0.2336
8.7800e-
003
0.2424
0.0000
1,105.977
1 1,105.977
1 0.0451
0.0000
1,107.103
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.1942
1.7765
2.0061
3.3300e-
003
0.0864
0.0864
0.0813
0.0813
0.0000
286.2789
286.2789
0.0681
0.0000
287.9814
Total
0.1942
1.7765
2.0061
3.3300e-
003
0.0864
0.0864
0.0813
0.0813
0.0000
286.2789
286.2789
0.0681
0.0000
287.9814
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0382
1.2511
0.4011
4.3000e-
003
0.1113
1.4600e-
003
0.1127
0.0321
1.4000e-
003
0.0335
0.0000
417.9930
417.9930
0.0228
0.0000
418.5624
Worker
0.2795
0.1910
2.2635
6.9100e-
003
0.7377
5.9100e-
003
0.7436
0.1960
5.4500e-
003
0.2014
0.0000
624.5363
624.5363
0.0164
0.0000
624.9466
Total
0.3177
1.4420
2.6646
0.0112
0.8490
7.3700e-
003
0.8564
0.2281
6.8500e-
003
0.2349
0.0000
1,042.529
4 1,042.529
4 0.0392
0.0000
1,043.509
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.1942
1.7765
2.0061
3.3300e-
003
0.0864
0.0864
0.0813
0.0813
0.0000
286.2785
286.2785
0.0681
0.0000
287.9811
Total
0.1942
1.7765
2.0061
3.3300e-
003
0.0864
0.0864
0.0813
0.0813
0.0000
286.2785
286.2785
0.0681
0.0000
287.9811
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0382
1.2511
0.4011
4.3000e-
003
0.1113
1.4600e-
003
0.1127
0.0321
1.4000e-
003
0.0335
0.0000
417.9930
417.9930
0.0228
0.0000
418.5624
Worker
0.2795
0.1910
2.2635
6.9100e-
003
0.7377
5.9100e-
003
0.7436
0.1960
5.4500e-
003
0.2014
0.0000
624.5363
624.5363
0.0164
0.0000
624.9466
Total
0.3177
1.4420
2.6646
0.0112
0.8490
7.3700e-
003
0.8564
0.2281
6.8500e-
003
0.2349
0.0000
1,042.529
4 1,042.529
4 0.0392
0.0000
1,043.509
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
6.7100e-
003
0.0663
0.0948
1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000
13.0175
13.0175
4.2100e-
003
0.0000
13.1227
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
6.7100e-
003
0.0663
0.0948
1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000
13.0175
13.0175
4.2100e-
003
0.0000
13.1227
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.8000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.6156
0.6156
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.6160
Total
2.8000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.6156
0.6156
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.6160
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
6.7100e-
003
0.0663
0.0948
1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000
13.0175
13.0175
4.2100e-
003
0.0000
13.1227
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
6.7100e-
003
0.0663
0.0948
1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000
13.0175
13.0175
4.2100e-
003
0.0000
13.1227
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.8000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.6156
0.6156
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.6160
Total
2.8000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.6156
0.6156
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.6160
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Total
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Total
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating
4.1372
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1600e-
003
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Total
4.1404
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Total
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating
4.1372
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1600e-
003
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Total
4.1404
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Total
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
1.5857
7.9962
19.1834
0.0821
7.7979
0.0580
7.8559
2.0895
0.0539
2.1434
0.0000
7,620.498
6 7,620.498
6 0.3407
0.0000
7,629.016
2 Unmitigated
1.5857
7.9962
19.1834
0.0821
7.7979
0.0580
7.8559
2.0895
0.0539
2.1434
0.0000
7,620.498
6 7,620.498
6 0.3407
0.0000
7,629.016
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
145.75
154.25
154.00
506,227
506,227
Apartments Mid Rise
4,026.75
3,773.25
4075.50
13,660,065
13,660,065
General Office Building
288.45
62.55 31.05
706,812
706,812
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
2,368.80
2,873.52
2817.72
3,413,937
3,413,937
Hotel
192.00
187.50
160.00
445,703
445,703
Quality Restaurant
501.12
511.92
461.20
707,488
707,488
Regional Shopping Center
528.08
601.44
357.84
1,112,221
1,112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 General Office Building
16.60 8.40
6.90 33.00
48.00 19.00
77 19
4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40
6.90 8.50
72.50 19.00
37 20
43 Hotel
16.60 8.40
6.90 19.40
61.60 19.00
58 38
4 Quality Restaurant
16.60 8.40
6.90 12.00
69.00 19.00
38 18
44 Regional Shopping Center
16.60 8.40
6.90 16.30
64.70 19.00
54 35
11 5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Apartments Mid Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
General Office Building
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Hotel
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Quality Restaurant
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Regional Shopping Center
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494
2.2000e-
003
0.0188
8.0100e-
003
1.2000e-
004
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
0.0000
21.7988
21.7988
4.2000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704
0.6018
0.2561
3.8400e-
003
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0000
696.9989
696.9989
0.0134
0.0128
701.1408
General Office
Building
468450
2.5300e-
003
0.0230
0.0193
1.4000e-
004
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
0.0000
24.9983
24.9983
4.8000e-
004
4.6000e-
004
25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448
0.4072
0.3421
2.4400e-
003
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0000
443.3124
443.3124
8.5000e-
003
8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel
1.74095e
+006
9.3900e-
003
0.0853
0.0717
5.1000e-
004
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
0.0000
92.9036
92.9036
1.7800e-
003
1.7000e-
003
93.4557
Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e-
003
0.0905
0.0760
5.4000e-
004
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
0.0000
98.5139
98.5139
1.8900e-
003
1.8100e-
003
99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840
5.0000e-
004
4.5000e-
003
3.7800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
4.9009
4.9009
9.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
005
4.9301
Total
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494
2.2000e-
003
0.0188
8.0100e-
003
1.2000e-
004
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
0.0000
21.7988
21.7988
4.2000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704
0.6018
0.2561
3.8400e-
003
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0000
696.9989
696.9989
0.0134
0.0128
701.1408
General Office
Building
468450
2.5300e-
003
0.0230
0.0193
1.4000e-
004
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
0.0000
24.9983
24.9983
4.8000e-
004
4.6000e-
004
25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448
0.4072
0.3421
2.4400e-
003
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0000
443.3124
443.3124
8.5000e-
003
8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel
1.74095e
+006
9.3900e-
003
0.0853
0.0717
5.1000e-
004
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
0.0000
92.9036
92.9036
1.7800e-
003
1.7000e-
003
93.4557
Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e-
003
0.0905
0.0760
5.4000e-
004
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
0.0000
98.5139
98.5139
1.8900e-
003
1.8100e-
003
99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840
5.0000e-
004
4.5000e-
003
3.7800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
4.9009
4.9009
9.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
005
4.9301
Total
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010
33.7770
1.3900e-
003
2.9000e-
004
33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519
0.0107
1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550
186.2502
7.6900e-
003
1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022
0.0209
4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel
550308
175.3399
7.2400e-
003
1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120
112.5116
4.6500e-
003
9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000
240.8778
9.9400e-
003
2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total
2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010
33.7770
1.3900e-
003
2.9000e-
004
33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519
0.0107
1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550
186.2502
7.6900e-
003
1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022
0.0209
4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel
550308
175.3399
7.2400e-
003
1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120
112.5116
4.6500e-
003
9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000
240.8778
9.9400e-
003
2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total
2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6700e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Unmitigated
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6700e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.3998
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0206
0.1763
0.0750
1.1200e-
003
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0000
204.1166
204.1166
3.9100e-
003
3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping
0.3096
0.1187
10.3054
5.4000e-
004
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0000
16.8504
16.8504
0.0161
0.0000
17.2540
Total
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6600e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.3998
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0206
0.1763
0.0750
1.1200e-
003
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0000
204.1166
204.1166
3.9100e-
003
3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping
0.3096
0.1187
10.3054
5.4000e-
004
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0000
16.8504
16.8504
0.0161
0.0000
17.2540
Total
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6600e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Unmitigated
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095
0.0535
1.3400e-
003
12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719
2.0867
0.0523
493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719
0.2627
6.5900e-
003
61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702
0.3580
8.8200e-
003
62.8482
Hotel
1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633
0.0416
1.0300e-
003
7.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934
0.0796
1.9600e-
003
13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250
0.1363
3.4200e-
003
31.9490
Total
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095
0.0535
1.3400e-
003
12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719
2.0867
0.0523
493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719
0.2627
6.5900e-
003
61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702
0.3580
8.8200e-
003
62.8482
Hotel
1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633
0.0416
1.0300e-
003
7.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934
0.0796
1.9600e-
003
13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250
0.1363
3.4200e-
003
31.9490
Total
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Unmitigated
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344
0.1380
0.0000
5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5
91.0415
5.3804
0.0000
225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952
0.5021
0.0000
21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4
86.9613
5.1393
0.0000
215.4430
Hotel
27.38 5.5579
0.3285
0.0000
13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818
0.0876
0.0000
3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359
0.7054
0.0000
29.5706
Total
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344
0.1380
0.0000
5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5
91.0415
5.3804
0.0000
225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952
0.5021
0.0000
21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4
86.9613
5.1393
0.0000
215.4430
Hotel
27.38 5.5579
0.3285
0.0000
13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818
0.0876
0.0000
3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359
0.7054
0.0000
29.5706
Total
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
11.0 Vegetation
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
45.00 1000sqft
1.03 45,000.00
0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
36.00 1000sqft
0.83 36,000.00
0 Hotel
50.00 Room
1.67 72,600.00
0 Quality Restaurant
8.00 1000sqft
0.18 8,000.00
0 Apartments Low Rise
25.00 Dwelling Unit
1.56 25,000.00
72 Apartments Mid Rise
975.00
Dwelling Unit
25.66 975,000.00
2789
Regional Shopping Center
56.00 1000sqft
1.29 56,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)
2.2 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2028
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44
0.029
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
NumberWood
1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
158.37
79.82 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
131.84
78.27 tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
127.15
65.80 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2561
46.4415
31.4494
0.0636
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,163.416
6 6,163.416
6 1.9475
0.0000
6,212.103
9 2022
4.5441
38.8811
40.8776
0.1240
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 2023
4.1534
25.7658
38.7457
0.1206
7.0088
0.7592
7.7679
1.8799
0.7136
2.5935
0.0000
12,150.48
90 12,150.48
90 0.9589
0.0000
12,174.46
15 2024
237.0219
9.5478
14.9642
0.0239
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,313.180
8 2,313.180
8 0.7166
0.0000
2,331.095
6 Maximum
237.0219
46.4415
40.8776
0.1240
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2561
46.4415
31.4494
0.0636
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,163.416
6 6,163.416
6 1.9475
0.0000
6,212.103
9 2022
4.5441
38.8811
40.8776
0.1240
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 2023
4.1534
25.7658
38.7457
0.1206
7.0088
0.7592
7.7679
1.8799
0.7136
2.5935
0.0000
12,150.48
90 12,150.48
90 0.9589
0.0000
12,174.46
15 2024
237.0219
9.5478
14.9642
0.0239
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,313.180
8 2,313.180
8 0.7166
0.0000
2,331.095
5 Maximum
237.0219
46.4415
40.8776
0.1240
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 Total
41.1168
67.2262
207.5497
0.6278
45.9592
2.4626
48.4217
12.2950
2.4385
14.7336
0.0000
76,811.18
16 76,811.18
16 2.8282
0.4832
77,025.87
86 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 Total
41.1168
67.2262
207.5497
0.6278
45.9592
2.4626
48.4217
12.2950
2.4385
14.7336
0.0000
76,811.18
16 76,811.18
16 2.8282
0.4832
77,025.87
86 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
9/1/2021
10/12/2021
5 30
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
10/13/2021
11/9/2021
5 20
3 Grading
Grading
11/10/2021
1/11/2022
5 45
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
1/12/2022
12/12/2023
5 500
5 Paving
Paving
12/13/2023
1/30/2024
5 35
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
1/31/2024
3/19/2024
5 35
OffRoad Equipment
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
±
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158
0.38 Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158
0.38 Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187
0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247
0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367
0.48 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231
0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130
0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132
0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00
0.00 458.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 801.00
143.00
0.00 10.00
6.90 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 160.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1273
4.0952
0.9602
0.0119
0.2669
0.0126
0.2795
0.0732
0.0120
0.0852
1,292.241
3 1,292.241
3 0.0877
1,294.433
7 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0487
0.0313
0.4282
1.1800e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
117.2799
117.2799
3.5200e-
003
117.3678
Total
0.1760
4.1265
1.3884
0.0131
0.3810
0.0135
0.3946
0.1034
0.0129
0.1163
1,409.521
2 1,409.521
2 0.0912
1,411.801
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1273
4.0952
0.9602
0.0119
0.2669
0.0126
0.2795
0.0732
0.0120
0.0852
1,292.241
3 1,292.241
3 0.0877
1,294.433
7 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0487
0.0313
0.4282
1.1800e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
117.2799
117.2799
3.5200e-
003
117.3678
Total
0.1760
4.1265
1.3884
0.0131
0.3810
0.0135
0.3946
0.1034
0.0129
0.1163
1,409.521
2 1,409.521
2 0.0912
1,411.801
5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Total
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Total
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Total
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Total
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Total
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Total
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4079
13.2032
3.4341
0.0364
0.9155
0.0248
0.9404
0.2636
0.0237
0.2873
3,896.548
2 3,896.548
2 0.2236
3,902.138
4 Worker
2.4299
1.5074
21.0801
0.0607
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
6,042.558
5 6,042.558
5 0.1697
6,046.800
0 Total
2.8378
14.7106
24.5142
0.0971
7.0087
0.0741
7.0828
1.8799
0.0691
1.9490
9,939.106
7 9,939.106
7 0.3933
9,948.938
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4079
13.2032
3.4341
0.0364
0.9155
0.0248
0.9404
0.2636
0.0237
0.2873
3,896.548
2 3,896.548
2 0.2236
3,902.138
4 Worker
2.4299
1.5074
21.0801
0.0607
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
6,042.558
5 6,042.558
5 0.1697
6,046.800
0 Total
2.8378
14.7106
24.5142
0.0971
7.0087
0.0741
7.0828
1.8799
0.0691
1.9490
9,939.106
7 9,939.106
7 0.3933
9,948.938
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3027
10.0181
3.1014
0.0352
0.9156
0.0116
0.9271
0.2636
0.0111
0.2747
3,773.876
2 3,773.876
2 0.1982
3,778.830
0 Worker
2.2780
1.3628
19.4002
0.0584
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,821.402
8 5,821.402
8 0.1529
5,825.225
4 Total
2.5807
11.3809
22.5017
0.0936
7.0088
0.0595
7.0682
1.8799
0.0552
1.9350
9,595.279
0 9,595.279
0 0.3511
9,604.055
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3027
10.0181
3.1014
0.0352
0.9156
0.0116
0.9271
0.2636
0.0111
0.2747
3,773.876
2 3,773.876
2 0.1982
3,778.830
0 Worker
2.2780
1.3628
19.4002
0.0584
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,821.402
8 5,821.402
8 0.1529
5,825.225
4 Total
2.5807
11.3809
22.5017
0.0936
7.0088
0.0595
7.0682
1.8799
0.0552
1.9350
9,595.279
0 9,595.279
0 0.3511
9,604.055
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Total
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Total
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Total
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Total
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280
1,127.458
3 Total
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280
1,127.458
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280
1,127.458
3 Total
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280
1,127.458
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 Unmitigated
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
145.75
154.25
154.00
506,227
506,227
Apartments Mid Rise
4,026.75
3,773.25
4075.50
13,660,065
13,660,065
General Office Building
288.45
62.55 31.05
706,812
706,812
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
2,368.80
2,873.52
2817.72
3,413,937
3,413,937
Hotel
192.00
187.50
160.00
445,703
445,703
Quality Restaurant
501.12
511.92
461.20
707,488
707,488
Regional Shopping Center
528.08
601.44
357.84
1,112,221
1,112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 General Office Building
16.60 8.40
6.90 33.00
48.00 19.00
77 19
4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40
6.90 8.50
72.50 19.00
37 20
43 Hotel
16.60 8.40
6.90 19.40
61.60 19.00
58 38
4 Quality Restaurant
16.60 8.40
6.90 12.00
69.00 19.00
38 18
44 Regional Shopping Center
16.60 8.40
6.90 16.30
64.70 19.00
54 35
11 5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Apartments Mid Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
General Office Building
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Hotel
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Quality Restaurant
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Regional Shopping Center
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4769.72
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5057.75
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
251.616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1.11916
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35.7843
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1.28342
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22.7599
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4.76972
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5.05775
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
0.251616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
45.00 1000sqft
1.03 45,000.00
0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
36.00 1000sqft
0.83 36,000.00
0 Hotel
50.00 Room
1.67 72,600.00
0 Quality Restaurant
8.00 1000sqft
0.18 8,000.00
0 Apartments Low Rise
25.00 Dwelling Unit
1.56 25,000.00
72 Apartments Mid Rise
975.00
Dwelling Unit
25.66 975,000.00
2789
Regional Shopping Center
56.00 1000sqft
1.29 56,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)
2.2 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2028
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44
0.029
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
NumberWood
1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
158.37
79.82 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
131.84
78.27 tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
127.15
65.80 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2621
46.4460
31.4068
0.0635
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,154.337
7 6,154.337
7 1.9472
0.0000
6,203.018
6 2022
4.7966
38.8851
39.6338
0.1195
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 2023
4.3939
25.8648
37.5031
0.1162
7.0088
0.7598
7.7685
1.8799
0.7142
2.5940
0.0000
11,710.40
80 11,710.40
80 0.9617
0.0000
11,734.44
97 2024
237.0656
9.5503
14.9372
0.0238
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,307.051
7 2,307.051
7 0.7164
0.0000
2,324.962
7 Maximum
237.0656
46.4460
39.6338
0.1195
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2621
46.4460
31.4068
0.0635
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,154.337
7 6,154.337
7 1.9472
0.0000
6,203.018
6 2022
4.7966
38.8851
39.6338
0.1195
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 2023
4.3939
25.8648
37.5031
0.1162
7.0088
0.7598
7.7685
1.8799
0.7142
2.5940
0.0000
11,710.40
80 11,710.40
80 0.9617
0.0000
11,734.44
97 2024
237.0656
9.5503
14.9372
0.0238
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,307.051
7 2,307.051
7 0.7164
0.0000
2,324.962
7 Maximum
237.0656
46.4460
39.6338
0.1195
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 Total
40.7912
67.7872
202.7424
0.6043
45.9592
2.4640
48.4231
12.2950
2.4399
14.7349
0.0000
74,422.37
87 74,422.37
87 2.8429
0.4832
74,637.44
17 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 Total
40.7912
67.7872
202.7424
0.6043
45.9592
2.4640
48.4231
12.2950
2.4399
14.7349
0.0000
74,422.37
87 74,422.37
87 2.8429
0.4832
74,637.44
17 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
9/1/2021
10/12/2021
5 30
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
10/13/2021
11/9/2021
5 20
3 Grading
Grading
11/10/2021
1/11/2022
5 45
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
1/12/2022
12/12/2023
5 500
5 Paving
Paving
12/13/2023
1/30/2024
5 35
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
1/31/2024
3/19/2024
5 35
OffRoad Equipment
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
±
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158
0.38 Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158
0.38 Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187
0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247
0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367
0.48 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231
0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130
0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132
0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00
0.00 458.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 801.00
143.00
0.00 10.00
6.90 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 160.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1304
4.1454
1.0182
0.0117
0.2669
0.0128
0.2797
0.0732
0.0122
0.0854
1,269.855
5 1,269.855
5 0.0908
1,272.125
2 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0532
0.0346
0.3963
1.1100e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
110.4707
110.4707
3.3300e-
003
110.5539
Total
0.1835
4.1800
1.4144
0.0128
0.3810
0.0137
0.3948
0.1034
0.0131
0.1165
1,380.326
2 1,380.326
2 0.0941
1,382.679
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1304
4.1454
1.0182
0.0117
0.2669
0.0128
0.2797
0.0732
0.0122
0.0854
1,269.855
5 1,269.855
5 0.0908
1,272.125
2 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0532
0.0346
0.3963
1.1100e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
110.4707
110.4707
3.3300e-
003
110.5539
Total
0.1835
4.1800
1.4144
0.0128
0.3810
0.0137
0.3948
0.1034
0.0131
0.1165
1,380.326
2 1,380.326
2 0.0941
1,382.679
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Total
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Total
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Total
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Total
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Total
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Total
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4284
13.1673
3.8005
0.0354
0.9155
0.0256
0.9412
0.2636
0.0245
0.2881
3,789.075
0 3,789.075
0 0.2381
3,795.028
3 Worker
2.6620
1.6677
19.4699
0.0571
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
5,691.935
4 5,691.935
4 0.1602
5,695.940
8 Total
3.0904
14.8350
23.2704
0.0926
7.0087
0.0749
7.0836
1.8799
0.0699
1.9498
9,481.010
4 9,481.010
4 0.3984
9,490.969
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4284
13.1673
3.8005
0.0354
0.9155
0.0256
0.9412
0.2636
0.0245
0.2881
3,789.075
0 3,789.075
0 0.2381
3,795.028
3 Worker
2.6620
1.6677
19.4699
0.0571
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
5,691.935
4 5,691.935
4 0.1602
5,695.940
8 Total
3.0904
14.8350
23.2704
0.0926
7.0087
0.0749
7.0836
1.8799
0.0699
1.9498
9,481.010
4 9,481.010
4 0.3984
9,490.969
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3183
9.9726
3.3771
0.0343
0.9156
0.0122
0.9277
0.2636
0.0116
0.2752
3,671.400
7 3,671.400
7 0.2096
3,676.641
7 Worker
2.5029
1.5073
17.8820
0.0550
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,483.797
4 5,483.797
4 0.1442
5,487.402
0 Total
2.8211
11.4799
21.2591
0.0893
7.0088
0.0601
7.0688
1.8799
0.0557
1.9356
9,155.198
1 9,155.198
1 0.3538
9,164.043
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3183
9.9726
3.3771
0.0343
0.9156
0.0122
0.9277
0.2636
0.0116
0.2752
3,671.400
7 3,671.400
7 0.2096
3,676.641
7 Worker
2.5029
1.5073
17.8820
0.0550
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,483.797
4 5,483.797
4 0.1442
5,487.402
0 Total
2.8211
11.4799
21.2591
0.0893
7.0088
0.0601
7.0688
1.8799
0.0557
1.9356
9,155.198
1 9,155.198
1 0.3538
9,164.043
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Total
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Total
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Total
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Total
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Total
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Total
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 Unmitigated
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
145.75
154.25
154.00
506,227
506,227
Apartments Mid Rise
4,026.75
3,773.25
4075.50
13,660,065
13,660,065
General Office Building
288.45
62.55 31.05
706,812
706,812
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
2,368.80
2,873.52
2817.72
3,413,937
3,413,937
Hotel
192.00
187.50
160.00
445,703
445,703
Quality Restaurant
501.12
511.92
461.20
707,488
707,488
Regional Shopping Center
528.08
601.44
357.84
1,112,221
1,112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 General Office Building
16.60 8.40
6.90 33.00
48.00 19.00
77 19
4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40
6.90 8.50
72.50 19.00
37 20
43 Hotel
16.60 8.40
6.90 19.40
61.60 19.00
58 38
4 Quality Restaurant
16.60 8.40
6.90 12.00
69.00 19.00
38 18
44 Regional Shopping Center
16.60 8.40
6.90 16.30
64.70 19.00
54 35
11 5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Apartments Mid Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
General Office Building
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Hotel
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Quality Restaurant
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Regional Shopping Center
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4769.72
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5057.75
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
251.616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1.11916
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35.7843
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1.28342
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22.7599
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4.76972
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5.05775
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
0.251616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,623
Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 120.77
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,024
Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 100.80
% Decrease in Construction-related GHG Emissions 17%
Local Hire Provision Net Change
With Local Hire Provision
Without Local Hire Provision
Attachment C
EXHIBIT B
SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 June 2019
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist
Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.
M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.
B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.
Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years’ experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.
Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling operations, oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, and many other industrial and agricultural sources. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities.
Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at dozens of sites and has testified as an expert witness on more than ten cases involving exposure to air contaminants from industrial sources.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 June 2019
Professional History:
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist
Publications:
Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48
Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.
Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.
Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.
Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 June 2019
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.
Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.
Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.
Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.
Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.
Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.
Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.
Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 June 2019
Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.
Presentations:
Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.
Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.
Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 June 2019
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.
Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.
Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.
Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.
Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 June 2019
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.
Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.
Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 June 2019
Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.
Teaching Experience:
UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.
National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.
National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.
California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.
UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.
University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.
U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.
Academic Grants Awarded:
California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.
Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.
Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.
Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.
King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.
James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.
United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.
Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 June 2019
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.
Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case: No 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 June 2019
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Jerry Dovico, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Valley View Sine LLC, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Doug Pauls, et al.,, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.
Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana, New Mexico Betty Gonzalez, et al. Plaintiffs vs. Del Oro Dairy, Del Oro Real Estate LLC, Jerry Settles and Deward DeRuyter, Defendants
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.
Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma Tommy McCarty, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Oklahoma City Landfill, LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City Landfill, et al. Defendants.
Case No. 5:12-cv-01152-C
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2014
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 June 2019
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.
Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Kyle Cannon, Eugene Donovan, Genaro Ramirez, Carol Sassler, and Harvey Walton, each Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. BP Products North America, Inc., Defendant.
Case 3:10-cv-00622
Rosenfeld Deposition: February 2012
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2013
In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland
Philip E. Cvach, II et al., Plaintiffs vs. Two Farms, Inc. d/b/a Royal Farms, Defendants Case Number: 03-C-12-012487 OT
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013
EXHIBIT C
1640 5th St.., Suite 204 Santa
Santa Monica, California 90401
Tel: (949) 887‐9013
Email: [email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
G
eologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
CEQA Review
Education:
M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.
B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.
Professional Certifications:
California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:
Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring.
Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques.
Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2014; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003);
• Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).
Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:
With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. • Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA.
• Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.
• Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation. • Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. • Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant.
With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
2 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. 3 • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.
Executive Director:
As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.
Hydrogeology:
As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.
At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.
As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
4 • Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.
Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.
EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.
With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.
Policy:
Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 5 Geology:
With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.
As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.
Teaching:
From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.
Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014.
Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.
EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.
Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.
6 Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.
Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.
Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.
7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.
Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential Water Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.
Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.
Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.
Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.
Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.
Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.
Other Experience:
Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009‐ 2011.
9 News May 25, 2023
Rendering courtesy of The Vernon Group
REDEVELOPING AND REPURPOSING: This rendering shows what the new loft-style apartments would look like after The Vernon Group repurposes the old Fallas Building on West Broadway and Main Street.
After waiting for years for Santa Maria to develop its downtown, Ed Carcarey said he’s excited to nally see some investment and promise for more housing, restaurants, and businesses in the city.
Santa Maria makes headway on the decades-long Downtown
Speci c Plan, but residents are concerned about impacts on current neighborhoods and businesses
By Taylor O'Connor
“I’ve been involved with the downtown [area] since I’ve owned a business in the city for 25 years now, located on the northern part of Santa Maria, so the downtown to me is important,” Carcarey said.
Carcarey runs Santa Maria’s Downtown Fridays: a family-friendly event that happens every Friday until the last week in September, drawing in more than 2,500 people.
Now, Carcarey will have to look for a new location for Downtown Fridays. This year, the Santa Maria City Council approved converting the old Fallas building into 104 loft-style apartments as part of the city’s Downtown Speci c Plan—which aims to help make downtown a more pedestrian-friendly environment that brings vibrancy to the area with commercial and residential uses, open spaces, and plazas.
While some residents are concerned about what this might do to Downtown Fridays, and the community in general, Carcarey, along with city of cials and the developer, said that it would only bene t the city.
“I truly believe it’s only going to help Downtown Fridays because it brings more people to the downtown,” Carcarey said. “It’s going to bring more challenges. Eventually we are going to have to nd a new location. We’ve been doing it in the same spot for eight years.” But the challenges, he said, will be worth it if it means the decades-long Downtown Speci c Plan nally comes to fruition, giving Santa Maria a pedestrian friendly, more vibrant downtown area.
“We can debate how it looks, how many oors there are, and parking, but bottom line: we have to do something because we don’t have a downtown and the presentation is terrible,” Carcarey said. “We’ll gure it out as we go, but sitting back and continuing to debate it for a couple of more decades—that doesn’t work.”
In 2020, the city issued a request for proposal focused on underused, city-owned lots for potential redevelopment downtown. Community Development Director Chuen Wu—who recently legally changed his last name from Ng—said Santa Maria accepted proposals from Santa Barbara-based construction company The Vernon Group, which kickstarted new downtown development plans.
“We’re in the middle of the process where we have drawings, we have one development agreement for one of the parcels,” Wu said. “Ultimately, the city would dispose of these properties and the developer would develop a project that meets the city’s goal.” The Vernon Group got Santa Maria City Council’s approval to build the 104-unit apartment complex in the old Fallas Building during its March 7 meeting. Another proposal to convert the old Bradley Hotel into a mixed-use building with 80 apartments and a ground oor retail space is scheduled to go before the Planning Commission later this year, Wu said. About 25 percent of the units for the two projects will be for affordable housing with the rest at market rate.
Another mixed use development project, proposed by Mark Fugate, aims to develop 104 apartments on Cook Street with ground oor commercial. In April, it went before the Planning Commission for a study session.
“Downtown redevelopment takes a lot of focus, energy, and effort. We’re trying to facilitate change that otherwise probably wouldn’t occur if nobody took initiative,” Wu said. “Even if we do nothing, something happens. If we do nothing, it will continue to decline. This is a proactive effort to reverse those trends and to not just reverse economic trends, but literally transform the area.”
Downtown’s evolution came in three phases, Wu said. The rst was the original downtown that established a city center and a grid layout more than 100 years ago. That remained until the Santa Maria Mall opened in 1975, introducing “Santa Maria 2.0,” Wu said. “Now, it’s been 30 to 40 years past that time frame and we’re really looking at the third evolution of downtown, and it includes the mall, Main Street and Broadway, and in some ways it’s an attempt to bring everything together,” he said.
In 2004 and again in 2015, the city conducted public outreach for the Downtown Speci c Plan to de ne a vision and create a road map to achieve those goals. “It doesn’t dictate what it should look like, but there are some overarching goals for people to talk and gather in an environment that is going to feel comfortable, that would attract additional destinations like restaurants and bars and places that people can go on a
weekend. That’s really the larger vision,” Wu said. “I understand there’s a lot of housing proposed and people may feel it’s too dense or too congested, but you have to look at congestion as an indicator of success.”
Orcutt resident Cliff Solomon said that he isn’t sure who will be lling these new spaces. “I think Santa Maria has a real problem having work for professionals. Certainly we support agriculture and do a good job with that, but I’m not sure where all of these people are going to be working,” Solomon said.
While Solomon may live in Orcutt, he shops, works with nonpro ts, and attends a local Methodist church in Santa Maria. He said he has a stake in what happens to the city. While he’s voiced concerns during public comment at City Council meetings about parking at the Methodist church during construction and when the units are occupied, Solomon said the city also needs to address the bigger picture of the jobs-housing balance. “There wasn’t a lot of work for me as an educated professional so that’s one of the dilemmas Santa Maria has,” he said. “There’s this division of North County and South County, it is there.
Can we get work for professionals not associated with agriculture?” In his own experience looking to move to and nd employment in Santa Maria after working at the University of Washington, Solomon had dif culty nding a job as an educator who taught clinicians how to use a computer program.
When he and his wife moved, he interviewed at Cottage Hospital but didn’t get an offer, and looked at Allan Hancock College but couldn’t nd a job due to low turnover rates at the school, he said. Eventually, he found a job at Vandenberg Space Force Base and a hospital in Lompoc.
“Is this work, is this revitalization going to draw those people, those young professionals? Is that who they are targeting? Who is going to be living in those lofts? Who is going to pay market rate for the lofts? Where are those people going to be employed?” he asked.
David Alpern, a partner at The Vernon Group, said that the Fallas loft style apartments cater to a variety of people who are looking for a turnkey lifestyle that allows them to leave on a weekend and gives them an abundance of amenities.
“I tend to think it’s people that want a speci c lifestyle and there can be a bunch of different demographics that want a similar lifestyle,” Alpern said. “Everything from recent grads to empty nesters … active military, teachers, rst responders. We want to provide housing that will cater to a wide mix of people.”
Along with the the Fallas building and the Bradley Hotel, The Vernon Group acquired two additional city-owned parcels and three other privately owned properties within Santa Maria’s Downtown Speci c Plan area.
“Change can be extremely scary—the fear of the unknown that can grip locals when development is coming and I strongly encourage them to reach out, to go on the internet and read the speci c plan. It’s been a document that’s been there for a long time,” Alpern said. “It’s the unknown that can be scary, the good news is the framework is there.” Reach Staff Writer Taylor O’Connor at [email protected]. 11 / / 4040
READ MOREREAD MORE44SHARESHARE
1 794 Sawnee Bean RoadThetford Center VT 05075Norman Marshall, President(802) [email protected] 26, 2023Stephanie PapayanisMitchell M. Tsai, Attorney At Law139 South Hudson Avenue Suite 200Pasadena, CA 91101Subject: Comments on the Alvin Newton Apartments ProjectDear Ms. Payayanis, I have reviewed vehicle miles traveled (“VMT”) and traffic impacts of the proposed Alvin Newton Apartments in the City of Santa Maria as described in the Planning Commission Staff Report, dated August 16, 2023, the Traffic and Circulation Study, dated March 26, 2023, and the Trip Generation and VMT Analysis Addendum, dated August 31, 2023. I have questions and a finding:1)Previously, the residential portion of the proposed project was presented as exempt from VMT analysis because of inclusion of affordable housing that is no longer included in the project. Now, the Addendum states that City staff have applied the City’s VMT calculator and concluded that the project meets the City’s VMT threshold for residential development and that a full VMT analysis is unnecessary. The threshold given in the Addendum is much higher than given in City documents from 2020. Where is the documentation of this higher threshold? Is the City’s VMT calculator and documentation available for others to evaluate and use?2)The Traffic and Circulation Study assumes that 43% of the restaurant traffic will be pass-by traffic based on outdated data from Kentucky and Florida collected in the 1990s. Those outdated data are likely from suburban sites where the restaurant is in a sea of free parking – very different that this proposed restaurant. A more realistic pass-by rate for the restaurant component should be applied, and the traffic analysis should be revised. 2 The Applicant Fails to Quantify the Project’s VMT Impacts As Required The Traffic and Circulation Study states:Consistent with the recommendations in the OPR Technical Advisory, Section 4.3.1 of the City of Santa Maria’s CEQA Guidelines establishes screening criteria for certain projects that are exempt from performing a detailed VMT analysis and may be presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact. Section 4.3.1-A states that: “The following discretionary development projects are not subject to VMT analysis: 1. Affordable housing projects where a minimum of 20 percent of the units are deed restricted for low or very low income residents.” 25% of the residential portion of the Project consists of affordable housing. The residential portion of the Project therefore satisfies the screening criteria for affordable housing projects and may be presumed to result in less than significant VMT impacts in accordance with the City of Santa Maria thresholds.This VMT screening is inconsistent with the current definition of the project as the August 16, 2023, Planning Commission Staff Report describes all the housing as “82-market-rate rental apartment units” (p. 1).The August 31, 2023, Addendum addresses this deficiency. Excerpts from the Addendum state: … the City of Santa Maria has adopted the countywide baseline average of home-based VMT per population for residential projects and thresholds set at 85% of these countywide baseline averages for determining whether a project’s VMT will be significant…New residential projects (single family, multi-family, mobile home) are required to generate less than 12.2 VMT per person (two-way trips) City staff utilized the City’s VMT calculator to develop VMT estimates for the residential portion of the Project (results attached). The VMT calculator indicated that the residential portion of the Project would generate 8.8 VMT per person, which is less than the threshold of 12.2 VMT per person. (Planning Commission Agenda, September 6, 2023, p. 207 of 1302)The Addendum raises new questions. Where is the documentation that 12.2 VMT per person is 85% of the countywide average? A June 24, 2020, report prepared for the City by DKS entitled Tech Memo VMT Thresholds and Procedures1 gives home-based VMT per person averages of:countywide 7.26 (Figure 6, p. 22),areawide: 5.9 (Figure 7, p. 23), andcitywide: 5.25 (Figure 8, p. 24).These values are all significantly lower than the value of 12.2 given in the Addendum. These lower values also were presented by DKS to City staff on August 5, 2020 (see slide reproduced here as Figure 1.).1 https://cityofsantamaria.civicweb.net/document/52640/ 3 Figure 1: Home-Based VMT Per Population Thresholds Developed for the City of Santa Maria2 Is the City’s VMT calculator and documentation available for others to evaluate and use? (Santa Barbara County has posted a VMT calculator and documentation online, but this is applicable only to the unincorporated parts of the county).The Traffic Study Exaggerates Proportion of Restaurant Traffic That Would Be Pass-ByThe Traffic and Circulation Study characterizes the restaurant component of the project as a High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant. The ITE Trip Generation manual description of this land use type is:This land use consists of sit-down, full-service eating establishments with a typical duration of stay of 60 minutes or less. This type of restaurant is usually moderately priced, frequently belongs to a restaurant chain, and is commonly referred to as casual dining. Generally, these restaurants serve lunch and dinner; they may also be open for breakfast and are sometimes open 24 hours a day. These restaurants typically do not accept reservations. A patron commonly waits to be seated, is served by wait staff, orders from a menu, and pays after the meal.This category includes suburban restaurant chains such as Denny’s, Applebee’s, Chili’s and Olive Garden. 2 https://cityofsantamaria.civicweb.net/document/52681/ 4 The Traffic and Circulation Study states:Pursuant to ITE recommendations, the trip generation analysis also accounts for “Pass-By” trips and “Primary” trips that would be generated by the commercial uses. Pass-By trips are trips that would come from the existing traffic streams on Broadway and Main Street; and would not affect the study-area street network beyond the Project site. Primary trips are trips with the sole purpose of patronizing the commercial center (i.e., from home to the store and then return home). Based on the data presented in the ITE Trip Generation manual, the PassBy Trip percentage for the restaurant is approximately 43%. (p. 9)The source data for the 43% number is based solely on outdated data collection done between 1993 and 1996 at restaurants located only in Florida and Kentucky. These data are too old to be applicable to the proposed project. In addition, it is likely that the data collection was done at suburban locations where the restaurants were surrounded by a sea of free parking intended to attract pass-by traffic. In sharp contrast, the parking for the proposed restaurant would be in a neighboring parking garage and would not be obvious to passing traffic, as well as raising questions about possible parking cost. The pass-by percentage for this restaurant will likely be much lower than 43%.The Traffic and Circulation Study A more realistic pass-by rate for the restaurant component should be applied, and the traffic analysis should be revised.Sincerely, Norman L. Marshall
5 6
ResumeNORMAN L. MARSHALL, [email protected] EDUCATION:Master of Science in Engineering Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 1982Bachelor of Science in Mathematics, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, 1977PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: (32 Years, 18 at Smart Mobility, Inc.)Norm Marshall helped found Smart Mobility, Inc. in 2001. Prior to this, he was at RSG for 14 years where he developed a national practice in travel demand modeling. He specializes in analyzing the relationships between the built environment and travel behavior and doing planning that coordinates multi-modal transportation with land use and community needs. Regional Land Use/Transportation Scenario PlanningPortland Area Comprehensive Transportation System (PACTS) – the Portland Maine Metropolitan Planning Organization. Updating regional travel demand model with new data (including AirSage), adding a truck model, and multiclass assignment including differentiation between cash toll and transponder payments.Loudoun County Virginia Dynamic Traffic Assignment – Enhanced subarea travel demand model to include Dynamic Traffic Assignment (Cube). Model being used to better understand impacts of roadway expansion on induced travel.Vermont Agency of Transportation-Enhanced statewide travel demand model to evaluate travel impacts of closures and delays resulting from severe storm events. Model uses innovate Monte Carlo simulations process to account for combinations of failures.California Air Resources Board – Led team including the University of California in $250k project that reviewed the ability of the new generation of regional activity-based models and land use models to accurately account for greenhouse gas emissions from alternative scenarios including more compact walkable land use and roadway pricing. This work included hands-on testing of the most complex travel demand models in use in the U.S. today.Climate Plan (California statewide) – Assisted large coalition of groups in reviewing and participating in the target setting process required by Senate Bill 375 and administered by the California Air Resources Board to reduce future greenhouse gas emissions through land use measures and other regional initiatives. Chittenden County (2060 Land use and Transportation Vision Burlington Vermont region) – led extensive public visioning project as part of MPO’s long-range transportation plan update.Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization – Implemented walk, transit and bike models within regional travel demand model. The bike model includes skimming bike networks including on-road and off-road bicycle facilities with a bike level of service established for each segment.Chicago Metropolis Plan and Chicago Metropolis Freight Plan (6-county region)— developed alternative transportation scenarios, made enhancements in the regional travel demand model, and used the enhanced
7 model to evaluate alternative scenarios including development of alternative regional transit concepts. Developed multi-class assignment model and used it to analyze freight alternatives including congestion pricing and other peak shifting strategies. Municipal PlanningCity of Grand Rapids – Michigan Street Corridor – developed peak period subarea model including non-motorized trips based on urban form. Model is being used to develop traffic volumes for several alternatives that are being additional analyzed using the City’s Synchro model City of Omaha - Modified regional travel demand model to properly account for non-motorized trips, transit trips and shorter auto trips that would result from more compact mixed-use development. Scenarios with different roadway, transit, and land use alternatives were modeled.City of Dublin (Columbus region) – Modified regional travel demand model to properly account for non-motorized trips and shorter auto trips that would result from more compact mixed-use development. The model was applied in analyses for a new downtown to be constructed in the Bridge Street corridor on both sides of an historic village center.City of Portland, Maine – Implemented model improvements that better account for non-motorized trips and interactions between land use and transportation and applied the enhanced model to two subarea studies.City of Honolulu – Kaka’ako Transit Oriented Development (TOD) – applied regional travel demand model in estimating impacts of proposed TOD including estimating internal trip capture.City of Burlington (Vermont) Transportation Plan – Led team that developing Transportation Plan focused on supporting increased population and employment without increases in traffic by focusing investments and policies on transit, walking, biking and Transportation Demand Management.Transit PlanningRegional Transportation Authority (Chicago) and Chicago Metropolis 2020 – evaluated alternative 2020 and 2030 system-wide transit scenarios including deterioration and enhance/expand under alternative land use and energy pricing assumptions in support of initiatives for increased public funding. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Austin, TX) Transit Vision – analyzed the regional effects of implementing the transit vision in concert with an aggressive transit-oriented development plan developed by Calthorpe Associates. Transit vision includes commuter rail and BRT.Bus Rapid Transit for Northern Virginia HOT Lanes (Breakthrough Technologies, Inc and Environmental Defense.) – analyzed alternative Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) strategies for proposed privately-developing High Occupancy Toll lanes on I-95 and I-495 (Capital Beltway) including different service alternatives (point-to-point services, trunk lines intersecting connecting routes at in-line stations, and hybrid). Roadway Corridor PlanningI-30 Little Rock Arkansas – Developed enhanced version of regional travel demand model that integrates TransCAD with open source Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) software, and used to model I-30 alternatives. Freeway bottlenecks are modeled much more accurately than in the base TransCAD model. 8 South Evacuation Lifeline (SELL) – In work for the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, used Dynamic Travel Assignment (DTA) to estimate evaluation times with different transportation alternatives in coastal South Caroline including a new proposed freeway.Hudson River Crossing Study (Capital District Transportation Committee and NYSDOT) – Analyzing long term capacity needs for Hudson River bridges which a special focus on the I-90 Patroon Island Bridge where a microsimulation VISSIM model was developed and applied.PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS (partial list)DTA Love: Co-leader of workshop on Dynamic Traffic Assignment at the June 2019 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference.Forecasting the Impossible: The Status Quo of Estimating Traffic Flows with Static Traffic Assignment and the Future of Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Research in Transportation Business and Management 2018.Assessing Freeway Expansion Projects with Regional Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Presented at the August 2018 Transportation Research Board Tools of the Trade Conference on Transportation Planning for Small and Medium Sized Communities.Vermont Statewide Resilience Modeling. With Joseph Segale, James Sullivan and Roy Schiff. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference. Assessing Freeway Expansion Projects with Regional Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference. Pre-Destination Choice Walk Mode Choice Modeling. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference. A Statistical Model of Regional Traffic Congestion in the United States, presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. MEMBERSHIPS/AFFILIATIONSAssociate Member, Transportation Research Board (TRB)Member and Co-Leader Project for Transportation Modeling Reform, Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU)
0 TECH MEMO VMT THRESHOLDS AND PROCEDURES
DATE: July 24, 2020
TO: Ryan Hostetter | City of Santa Maria
FROM: Jim Damkowitch and Erin Vaca | DKS Associates
SUBJECT: City of Santa Maria SB 743 Impl ementation –Draft VMT Analysis Procedures
Project 19089-001
BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION
In accordance with Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) and the resulting chan ges to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines published by the Natural Resources Agency, local agencies may no longer use measures of vehicle delay such as Level of Service (LOS) to quantify transportation impacts on the environment. While agencies may continue to maintain LOS standards and similar measures as a matter of local policy and for project analysis, Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) has been codified in the CEQA Guidelines as the most appropriate measure for measuring transportation impacts under CEQA. This change applies statewide as of July 1, 2020.
The change from LOS to VMT for CEQA purposes requires the City to revise its process and guidelines, which now must address VMT thresholds of significance, screening, and mitigation procedures.
The purpose of this memorandum is to:
document guidance, options, resources, and an alytical methodologies for evaluating VMT in the City of Santa Maria; and,
recommend for the City’s cons ideration VMT thresholds, proj ect screening criteria, and mitigation strategies
The information and recommendations detailed in this memorandum draw s heavily on technical guidance published by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR ) and an evaluation of greenhouse gas and VMT mitigation strategies from the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). These documents are descri bed in the following section and listed in the References section.
1 LEGISLTATIVE BACKGROUND
SB 743 was signed into law in 2013, with the intent to better align California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) practices with statewide sustainability go als related to efficient land use, greater multi- modal choices, and greenhouse gas reductions. The provisions of SB 743 become effective Statewide on July 1, 2020. Under SB 743, au tomobile delay, traditionally meas ured as level of service (LOS) will no longer be considered an environmenta l impact under CEQA. Inst ead, impacts will be determined by changes to VMT.
VMT measures the number and length of vehicle trips made on a daily basis:
VMT is a systemic metric and is a useful indicator of overall land use and tr ansportation efficiency, where the most efficient system is one that mi nimizes VMT by encouraging shorter vehicle trip lengths, more walking and biking, or increased carpooling and transit. VMT is not a good indicator of congestion nor is it useful for identifying hot-spot locations or infrastructure deficiencies.
Measuring VMT requires estimating or measuring the full length of vehicle trips by purpose, such as commutes, deliveries, or shopping trips that often cross between cities, counties, or states. For this reason, regional travel demand models, “big data,” and household travel surveys that are less limited by local agency boundaries are the preferred tools to estimate VMT under SB 743.
GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH (OPR) TECHNICAL ADVISORY In December 2018, OPR released it s final Technical Advisory on Ev aluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. Generally, OPR recommends that a reduction of 15% or more in VMT should be the target.
Below is a summary of OPR’s recommended VMT impact thresholds and methodologies for land use projects:
Residential (VMT/capita) – A proposed project exceeding a level of 15% below existing regional VMT per capita may indicate a significant transportation impact.
2 Existing VMT per capita may be measured as regi onal VMT per capita or as city VMT per capita.
Proposed development referencing a threshold based on city VMT per capita (rather than regional VMT per capita) should not cumulatively exceed th e number of units specified in the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) for that city and should be consistent with the SCS.
Office (VMT/employee) - A proposed project exceeding a leve l of 15% below existing regional VMT per employee may indicate a significant transportation impact.
Retail (net VMT) – A proposed project that results in a net increase in total area VMT may indicate a significant transportation impact.
Mixed-Use - Evaluate each component independently using above thresholds.
Redevelopment Projects - Measured based on net change in VMT for total area.
Infrastructure Projects (net VMT) – A proposed project that results in a net increase in total area VMT may indicate a significant transportation impact.
The OPR recommended thresholds for residential and office are expressed on a per capita or service population basis (i.e., per resident or employee). For CEQA purposes, this essentially normalizes for development size. As an example, a 10,000 sq.ft. office development can generate the same VMT per employee result as a 100,000 sq.ft. office development. Though the absolute amount of VMT and traffic generated by the 100,000 sq.ft. office projec t will be significantly greater, it would be considered equally as efficient as the 10,000 sq.ft. development. Project size is partially addressed through OPR’s recommended screening thresholds described below.
OPR RECOMMENDED SCREENING THRESHOLDS
OPR’s Technical Advisory lists the following screening thresholds for land use projects. These types of development projects are presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT and therefore, a less than significant adverse impact on transportation. OPR’s Technical Advisory suggests that lead agencies may screen out VMT impacts using project size, maps, transit availability, and provision of affordable housing.
Projects that are consistent with the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) or General Plan and generate or attract fewer than 110 daily trips (per CEQA). Map-based screening for residential and office projects located in low VMT areas, and incorporate similar features (density, mix of uses, transit accessibility).
3 Certain projects within ½ mile of an existing major transit stop 1 or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor. Ho wever, this will not apply if information indicates that the project will still generate high levels of VMT.
Affordable Housing Development in infill locations.
Locally serving retail projects, typically less than 50,000 square feet.
CALTRANS DRAFT VMT-FOCUSED TRANSPOR TATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES Caltrans has published a draft update of their Tr ansportation Impact Study Guidelines (Draft TISG, February 28, 2020), 30-day informal review period ended on March 30th. The Caltrans’ Draft TISG is intended for use in preparing a transportation impa ct analysis of land use projects or plans they may impact or affect the State Highway System. It is not clear when Calt rans review of a CEQA document would be required under SB 743, since it was previously triggered by a project’s potential trip generation and impact to automobile delay on a State Highway.
The Draft TISG heavily references OPR’s Technical Advisory as a basis for its guidance. The Draft TISG recommends use of OPR’s recommended thresholds for land use projects (15% below existing city or regional VMT per capita or per employee). As each lead agency develops and adopts its own VMT thresholds for land use projects, Caltrans will review them for consistency with OPR’s recommendations, and with the state’s GHG emissions reduction targets and CARB Scoping Plan.
Caltrans identifies a possible mitigation framework for projects found to have a potentially significant impact on VMT. These include the following programmatic measures:
Impact fee programs that contain a demonstr ated nexus and proporti onality between a fee and capital projects that result in VMT reduction;
VMT mitigation bank programs; and,
VMT mitigation exchange programs.
Caltrans also indicates th at a future update to the Draft TISG will include the basis for requesting transportation impact analysis that is not base d on VMT (including multimodal conflict/access management issues).
1 “major transit stop” - A major transit stop is a "site containing an existing rail, a ferry terminal served by bus or rail transit service, or intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during morning and evening peak hour commute". (OPR 2018)
4 CALTRANS DRAFT TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS UNDER CEQA (TAC) AND
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK (TAF)
Caltrans has also published additional document s related to SB 743 implementation. The draft Transportation Analysis Under CEQA (TAC) identifies the State’s preferred approaches for analyzing VMT under CEQA for projects on the State Highway System. The draft Transportation Analysis Framework (TAF) is for transportation projects and addresses how to perform induced travel analysis.
The TAF refers to OPR’s Technical Advisory for the list of highway projects “that would not likely lead to a substantial or measurable increase in vehicle travel, and therefore generally should not require an induced travel analysis”. TAC Screening:
“The use of VMT as the CEQA transportation metric will, for the most part, impact only capacity increasing projects. For other types of transportation projects, CEQA does not require a VMT impacts analysis beyond the screening process. Generally, there are two reasons such an analysis is not warranted. The first is because the type of project is expected to decrease or have no impact on VMT. The second is because the project’s VMT impacts have already been analyzed and, when necessary, mitigated to the extent feasible in an earlier CEQA document; thus, the analysis may “tier” from or otherwise rely on that earlier analysis.”
ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
To develop the City of Santa Maria VMT Thresholds a number of data sources and modeling resources were utilized. The data sources and technical review includes the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments Regional Travel Demand Model (SBCAG RTDM), US Census’s Longitudinal Employer- Housing Dynamics (LEHD) data, and published data for the region. The results of the VMT analysis utilizing the SBCAG RTDM and the LEHD Shortest Path GIS analysis is summarized.
Project-level VMT is assessed against countywide, regional, or local averages, per capita or per employee depending on the project type. It is critical, therefore, that the City carefully consider and establish baseline averages that reflect the travel behavior of their residents and employees. This baseline will be the measuring stick that all future projects will be measured against, until baselines are updated.
SBCAG REGIONAL TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL (RTDM)
The regional SBCAG RTDM was utilized to estimate trip-based Work and Residential Baseline VMT for the incorporated areas of the City. The SBCAG model is a traditional 4-Step travel demand model that runs in the TransCAD software platform.
The model generates trips based on the land uses and where people will live, work, study and shop, taking into account forecasted population growth. The model generates and tracks all trip types by all modes originating or ending in each juri sdiction within Santa Barbara County (considered “internal” trips), as well as all trips (not separa ted by trip purpose) from or into Ventura and San Luis Obispo Counties (considered “External” trips), including specifically the Cities of Nipomo, Arroyo
5 Grande, San Luis Obispo, Ventura, Oxnard, Camar illo, Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks. The use of the SBCAG RTDM for evaluation of VMT and associated trip distances is limited to the boundary of the three counties.
The base year 2010 model was utilized to estimate baseline VMT for the City of Santa Maria. The SBCAG RTDM produces trips by different trip purp oses and modes and provides VMT as an output.
To estimate trips associated with Residential VMT, all Home-Based vehicular trips (HBx2) internal to Santa Barbara County, and extern al trips between Santa Barbara County and San Luis Obispo and Ventura Counties (“IX” trips in the below table), were selected for evaluation of VMT per capita. To estimate trips associated with Work VMT, only Home-Base-Work (HBW) vehicular trips and “IX” trips were selected for evaluation.
Although the SBCAG RTDM is validated to 2010 ba se year, current federal/state criteria for the validation of travel demand models does not addres s VMT or average trip lengths by trip purpose.
To gauge how well the SBCAG RTDM performs relative to this criterion, a comparison of home-based work trip (HBW) average trip lengths and VMT fr om the SBCAG RTDM was compared to empirically based journey to work data. This validation check is described in the following section.
LONGITUDINAL EMPLOYER-HOUSEHOLD DYNAMICS (LEHD)
Journey-to-work data is available from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) program. The primary source of data used in th e LEHD program is the enhanced Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) microdata fi les obtained from each participating Local Employment Dynamics (LED) state. The employer-b a s e d Q C E W d a t a i s m e r g e d w i t h a d d i t i o n a l worker-based administrative data collected by the US Census Bureau to create integrated employer- worker data, available through two different data bases, Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI) and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES).
Unlike sample-based surveys (such as the U.S. Census’s American Community Survey or CTPP), the LEHD data provides a nearly complete enumeration of home-to-work flows covering over 90% of all workers and employers in the United States. The LEHD data does not contain details on the work trips such as mode choice, route, or travel times. The LEHD data does not include federal workers, self-employed or the military, and workplace location is assigned algorithmically for people who work for a business with multiple locations in a City. Since the SBCAG model provides information on mode choice, and does its own assignment of trips, the additional commute and socio-economic data from CTPP is not needed to determine VMT. The LEHD da ta provides many more origin-destination pairs than collected through sampled data and provides data for home-to-work flows.
Work destination (the primary work location of Santa Maria residents) and Home destination (where workers who work in Santa Mari a reside) data were downloaded from Longitudinal Employer- Household Dynamics (LEHD) OnTheMap for year 2017 (most recent data available).
2 HBx refers to any “Home based” trip, including work, shop, K-12, college, and other.
6 Shortest path analysis was performed using the ‘S hortest path (point to layer)’ network analysis within GIS software, with the Santa Maria designated place as the start point (centroid of the City), and the path type set to ‘Shortest’. The trip ends were defined as all centroids of each census designated place within California, including both incorporated Cities and unincorporated communities. The network utilized included primary and secondary roads within the State, excluding local roadways. With these settings, the travel distances from Santa Maria based on the shortest path analysis was estimated for each census designated place.
The home-to-work flows from LEHD were then superimposed on the routes and resulting distances to calculate VMT for each CDP. The associated trav el distance of each path (in miles), was output and multiplied by the number of trips, based on the LEHD data, to each destination, and then aggregated to obtain the total VMT for Santa Maria residents by Work destination (Residential VMT) and workers who work in Santa Maria (Work VMT).
The primary work location reported by LEHD may not represent the actual physical location where workers work, therefore, the VMT per capita was also calculated utilizing only the trip paths within a 90-mile buffer, thus removing errant outliers in the LEHD data that inflate the average VMT per capita.
As shown in Table 1, the weighted average HBW trip lengths between the LEHD data relative to the SBCAG RTDM are relatively consistent. Based on th is correspondence, it can be concluded that the SBCAG RTDM validates to empirically based trip lengths and can be used with confidence to determine the City of Santa Maria VMT Thresholds.
Table 1. LEHD and SBCAG RTDM Home-Based-Work Average Trip Length Comparison
Table 2 below shows the places where residents of Santa Maria commute to work (places with less than 300 residents have been removed from the table but are included in the calculation of average VMT). Table 3 shows the locations where workers who work in Santa Maria live (locations with less than 300 workers are also removed). The 2017 population of Santa Maria was 107,018 according to 2017 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. The 2017 OnTheMap results estimated 44,063 jobs in Santa Maria.
All HB
Geography VMT Trips VMT1 Trips VMT Trips LEHD SBCAG SBCAG Santa Barbara City 28,395 441 3,614 59 19,044 310 64.4 60.9 61.5 Goleta City 12,020 202 2,653 45 12,057 200 59.5 58.7 60.2 Santa Maria City 741 16,516 53,145 20,806 158,285 69,831 0.0 2.6 2.3 Lompoc City 33,660 1,391 40,650 1,749 18,055 746 24.2 23.2 24.2 Orcutt CDP 32,236 4,874 31,665 6,509 38,515 7,506 6.6 4.9 5.1 SLO City 18,857 668 12,815 448 37,777 1,383 28.2 28.6 27.3 Arroyo Pismo 69,209 2,861 69,958 2,974 16‐21 24.2 23.5 Santa Ynez CDP 6,874 210 7,642 224 N/A 32.8 34.1 Nipomo 13,875 1,558 85,330 7,019 44,836 3,879 8.9 12.2 11.6 Guadalupe City 8,297 971 13,228 1,394 8,946 981 8.5 9.5 9.1 Inbound Work Trips ‐ Attract.=Santa Maria Outbound Residential Trips Avg. Trip Length
LEHD SBCAG SBCAG HBW
7 Table 2. Place of Work of Workers Who Live in Santa Maria, SBCAG RTDM
8 Table 3. Place of Residence of Workers Who Work in Santa Maria, SBCAG RTDM Daily Home Based+IXXI Tripends from SBCAG Model (2010 Baseline Scenario) ‐ PA Format Home (Prod. E n d ) 123456 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 Total
1S a n t a Barbara City 96,749 16,695 121 95 63,956 3,829 26 202 202 12 206 1 182,092 2G o l e t a City 20,140 19,120 95 76 21,184 408 21 139 66 6 34 0 61,290 3S a n t a Maria City 620 400 139,663 1,493 15,684 284 15,013 2,765 5,947 448 7,758 1,961 192,036 4L o m p o c City 1,732 1,078 4,082 50,540 18,856 33 1,094 393 388 473 340 28 79,038 5O t h e r SB County 59,093 25,189 13,026 13,961 118,543 4,507 3,280 691 714 5,548 638 136 245,328 6O u t s i d e SB County 24,117 2,778 84 54 17,565 ‐ 11 ‐ ‐ 22 ‐ 0 44,632 7O r c u t t CDP 358 232 34,242 1,215 8,038 78 17,381 847 1,452 294 1,315 360 65,812 8S a n Luis Obispo City 32 10 897 157 302 ‐ 97 ‐ ‐ 48 ‐ 2 1,544 9 Arroyo Grande‐Pismo Beach Area 138 42 5,723 420 985 ‐ 506 ‐ ‐ 128 ‐ 12 7,954 10 Santa Ynez CDP 821 254 521 201 3,280 5 128 54 56 4,983 33 3 10,340 11 Nipomo‐Callender Area 239 72 14,038 599 1,547 ‐ 901 ‐ ‐ 105 ‐ 224 17,725 12 Guadalupe City 39 25 6,688 154 2,217 1 823 12 30 23 449 3,663 14,126 Total 204,078 65,896 219,179 68,966 272,158 9,145 39,281 5,104 8,855 12,091 10,774 6,390 921,917 Daily Home Based+IXXI VMT from SBCAG Model (2010 Baseline Scenario) ‐ PA Format Home (Prod. E n d ) 123456 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 Total
1S a n t a Barbara City 246,971 143,044 7,360 5,027 426,681 124,163 1,503 17,732 17,009 361 14,991 37 1,004,880 2G o l e t a City 165,492 40,217 5,550 3,372 165,631 17,399 1,146 12,021 5,462 154 2,397 30 418,873 3S a n t a Maria City 38,088 24,113 316,571 36,110 195,352 23,438 77,031 75,553 139,915 15,283 89,673 17,893 1,049,021 4L o m p o c City 90,581 48,336 94,848 76,402 287,201 2,562 21,506 20,026 17,757 11,446 12,040 794 683,497 5O t h e r SB County 533,425 195,681 245,076 100,490 813,706 112,686 54,321 42,124 36,786 35,647 23,484 2,684 2,196,111 6O u t s i d e SB County 761,545 112,361 5,000 4,096 415,214 ‐ 656 ‐ ‐ 1,453 ‐ 16 1,300,341 7O r c u t t CDP 20,372 12,900 163,852 23,523 103,416 6,206 28,902 27,515 41,580 8,689 22,175 4,449 463,579 8S a n Luis Obispo City 2,847 842 25,630 8,048 15,734 ‐ 3,185 ‐ ‐ 2,914 ‐ 50 59,249 9 Arroyo Grande‐Pismo Beach Area 11,683 3,435 138,418 19,077 45,262 ‐ 14,429 ‐ ‐ 7,307 ‐ 215 239,825 10 Santa Ynez CDP 24,359 7,007 17,081 4,836 35,264 300 3,735 3,249 3,170 7,120 1,477 112 107,709 11 Nipomo‐Callender Area 17,361 5,093 170,660 20,939 47,580 ‐ 15,034 ‐ ‐ 4,730 ‐ 1,651 283,049 12 Guadalupe City 2,708 1,694 63,089 4,295 25,417 29 10,026 288 563 969 3,570 3,438 116,086 Total 1,915,432 594,723 1,253,134 306,216 2,576,456 286,784 231,475 198,508 262,241 96,073 169,808 31,370 7,922,221 updated VMT total adjusting for OD trips 3,961,110
Avg HB+IXXI Trip Length
Home (Prod. E n d ) 123456 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 Total
1S a n t a Barbara City 3 9 61 53 7 32 57 88 84 30 73 69 6 2G o l e t a City 8 2 59 44 8 43 55 86 82 26 70 67 7 3S a n t a Maria City 61 60 2 24 12 83 5 27 24 34 12 9 5 4L o m p o c City 52 45 23 2 15 77 20 51 46 24 35 28 9 5O t h e r SB County 9 8 19 7 7 25 17 61 52 6 37 20 9 6O u t s i d e SB County 32 40 59 76 24 ‐ 62 ‐ ‐ 65 ‐ 63 29 7O r c u t t CDP 57 56 5 19 13 79 2 32 29 30 17 12 7 8S a n Luis Obispo City 89 87 29 51 52 ‐ 33 ‐ ‐ 61 ‐ 24 38 9 Arroyo Grande‐Pismo Beach Area 85 82 24 45 46 ‐ 29 ‐ ‐ 57 ‐ 19 30 10 Santa Ynez CDP 30 28 33 24 11 65 29 60 56 1 44 41 10 11 Nipomo‐Callender Area 73 70 12 35 31 ‐ 17 ‐ ‐ 45 ‐ 7 16 12 Guadalupe City 69 67 9 28 11 50 12 24 19 41 8 1 8 Total 9 9 6 4 9 31 6 39 30 8 16 5 9 Source: C:\SBCAG\BaseYear ‐2010\Outputs\VMT_Analysis\Hbased_VMTbyCity2.MTX (With 85% IXXI trips)
Work (Attraction)
Work (Attraction)
Work (Attraction)
9 PROPOSED VMT THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE PROJECTS
It is recommended that a variation of the OPR Tech nical Advisory land use type criteria to account for uses commonly found in the City. It is recommended that the City of Santa Maria assess land development projects according to the primary proposed land use type, as follows:
Residential VMT – Establish baseline VMT and threshold on a per capita basis. “Residential” uses include, but are not limited to, single-family, multi-family, and mobile homes.
Work VMT – Establish baseline VMT and threshold on a per employee basis. “Work” uses include, but are not limited to, office, office parks, light industrial, industrial, warehousing, manufacturing, and business parks.
The proposed thresholds are 85 percent of the existing baseline VMT per land use unit, as calculated within the City of Santa Maria for work (office, commercial, manufacturing), and residential uses. These recommendations are consistent with OPR guidance.
OTHER PROJECT TYPES
Retail
The recommended threshold for retail projects is any increase in total VMT that occurs as a result of the project. The OPR technical advisory give s 50,000 square feet for an individual retail establishment as a general guideline to distinguishi ng local from regional serving retail. Projects consisting of multiple spaces totaling more than 50,000 square feet might also be considered local serving retail if no single establishment is larger. For example, neighborhood centers3 -convenience oriented centers of up to 125,000 square feet leasable area and typically anchored by a supermarket -could be considered local-serving.
Medical – While calculation of baseline VMT rates for medical land uses is possible using the model outputs, it is recommend that medical projects be analyzed in terms of net VMT impacts in a manner similar to retail projects. As with retail, providing additional opportunities for healthcare may reduce the lengths of trips made for this purpose. By this line of reasoning, most freestanding clinics, medical practices, and nursing homes could be assumed less than significant with respect to VMT impacts.
Larger or regional-serving facilities such as hospitals would likely require an environmental document that considers employee and patient VMT separately.
3 International Council of Shopping Centers, U.S Shopping Center Classification and Characteristics. (January 2017), https://www.icsc.com/uploads/research/general/US_CENTER_CLASSIFICATION.pdf.
10 Industrial – The CEQA guidelines specify that the VMT to be considered when analyzing transportation impacts is passenger vehicle VMT. Truck trips, often the predominant type at industrial facilities, would not come into play as a transpor tation impact (although they would be considered under noise or air quality). Instead, industrial land uses may have to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis to determine the net light-duty VMT impacts of proposed projects. If employee travel is the predominant source of light duty trips at a faci lity, this component might be assessed against the equivalent VMT per employee threshold for office land uses.
Mixed Use Projects
For mixed use projects, OPR recommends either analyzing each component of the proposed project separately or focusing on the predominant land use.
It is recommended that updating the baseline VM T estimates occur every 4-5 years, approximately concurrent with an update to the Regional Tran sportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and Santa Barbara County Association of Governments travel demand model. The SBCAG “Fast Forward 2040” is the current RTP/SCS, adopted in August 2017.
SCREENING PROCEDURES AND TRAFFI C IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES Screening procedures will play an important part in streamlining project analysis. First, projects may be presumed to have less than significant VMT impacts due to size, proximity to high quality transit, and housing affordability. Second, projects may be screened according to location. Projects located in areas that have been shown to generate VMT below the selected threshold of significance may be presumed to have less than significant impacts and no further analysis or mitigation would be required. The City of Santa Maria may have the desire to retain its existing LOS standards for consistency with the current General Plan. Therefore, projects may be screened out of requiring VMT analysis for CEQA purposes but still require analysis of LOS, safety, access, site circulation, and other topics to meet local requirements. These analyses, which will occur outside of or in addition to CEQA VMT analysis, can continue to inform conditions of project approval by the City.
Figure 1 illustrates how the screening process would work in conjunction with local transportation analysis required by the City. The various screening options are described below. Projects with fewer than 100 trips per day would fall under the recommended screening criterion for VMT impacts and no formal VMT analysis would be required for CEQA. Projects generating between 100 (50 for residential) but fewer than 110 trips per day would not need to prepare VMT analysis for CEQA but would need to prepare a local transportation analysis covering topics such as trip distribution, assignment, LOS, and site distance. Projects expected to generate more than 110 daily trips would need to be checked against the remaining VMT screening criteria to see if a formal VMT analysis would be required in addition to the more extensive local transportation analysis.
These additional VMT screening criteria are also described below.
11 Figure 1. Proposed Screening Process for Transportation Impacts
12 SMALL OR INFILL PROJECTS
OPR advises that projects generating fewer than 110 trips per day could be presumed to have less than significant VMT impacts. Table 4 shows the maximum project size that would correspond to this threshold based on average ITE trip generation rates for selected land uses. This criterion could be applied in conjunction with the City’s current guidelines that require only a trip generation memorandum for smaller projects.
TABLE 4 PROJECT SIZE THRESHOLDS FOR VMT SCREENING
(GENERATION OF 110 OR FEWER DAILY TRIPS)
LAND USE ITE CODE SIZE THRESHOLD DAILY TRIP
GENERATION
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
210 11 units 104
MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENTIAL - LOW
RISE
220 15 units 110
MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENTIAL - MID
RISE
221 20.0 units 109
MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENTIAL - HIGH
RISE
222 24 units 107
MID-RISE RESIDENTIAL
WITH 1ST FLOOR
COMMERCIAL
231 32 units 110
SMALL OFFICE
BUILDING
712 6,800 square feet 110
SINGLE TENANT OFFICE
BLDG.
715 9,750 square feet 110
Source: ITE Trip Generation 10th Edition (https://itetripgen.org/)
LOW INCOME HOUSING
As one of many strategies to address California’s housing crisis, OPR advises that residential projects consisting of 100 percent affordable units may be presumed to have less than significant VMT impacts. The City may wish to specify additional criteria such as a specific percentage of non-market rates units within an overall development proposal for application of this screening option. For instance, the City of Goleta recently adopted that if at least 20 percent of a housing development consists of non-market rate housing then the entire development proposal would satisfy this screen. The City of Santa Maria may want to consider a similar “percentage of total” low-income housing criteria. Additionally, given the importance of agriculture to the City’s economy, the City may want to consider specifically including farmworker housing.
13 LOCAL SERVING RETAIL
The OPR technical guidance recommends that retail projects be analyzed in terms of net VMT impacts (i.e. total VMT that would occur with and without the project). By increasing retail opportunities closer to homes and workplaces, local serving retail may decrease overall VMT if it substitutes for longer trips. OPR advises that projects of 50,000 or fewer square feet for an individual retail establishment may be used to distinguish local serving retail from more regional establishments that draw customers from greater distances. Although jurisdictions throughout California have considered a more stringent retail development threshold size (i.e., < 50,0000 sq.ft.), exceeding this threshold is not advised given OPR’s guidance. For jurisdictions who would like to attract more retail development it is advisable to adopt the 50,000 or fewer square feet size threshold recommended by OPR.
PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT
Section 15064.3 of the CEQA Guidelines specifies that residential or office projects within one- half mile of an existing major transit station or stop along an existing high-quality transit corridor can be presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact. OPR guidance and Public Resources Code § 21064.3, major transit stops are defined as a site containing an existing rail transit station or the intersection of at least two bus routes with a combined frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.
High-quality transit corridors are defined as having fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during the peak commute hours.
Santa Maria Area Transit (SMAT) & Breeze SMAT provides both fixed-route and demand- response service in the Santa Maria area, including Orcutt and Tanglewood, utilizing a fleet of 48 active vehicles (11 for ADA/demand response, 16 for commuter service, two for trolley service, and the remaining for fixed route service). SMAT provides service Monday through Friday between the hours of 5:30 AM and 10:30 PM, and Saturday and Sunday between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM. The City of Santa Maria manages the transit system and contracts with a private operator for operation of the service.
Guadalupe Transit – Guadalupe Shuttle and Guadalupe Flyer The City of Guadalupe provides both fixed-route and demand-response service in Guadalupe and to Santa Maria. The Guadalupe Shuttle is a deviated fixed-route service that operates in the City of Guadalupe, Monday through Friday, from 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM, utilizing one bus. The Guadalupe Flyer is a fixed-route service that operates between Guadalupe and Santa Maria, 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM Monday through Friday, 8:15 AM - 5:15 PM on Saturday, and 8:45 AM – 6:35 PM on Sunday. The City also owns one ADA van. The City of Guadalupe manages the transit system and contracts with SMOOTH (Santa Maria Organization of Transportation Helpers) for operation of the service. In FY 2014/15, Guadalupe Transit had 105,572 boardings system-wide and achieved a farebox recovery ratio of 24 percent.
14 Clean Air Express The Clean Air Express provides fixed-route commuter service from Lompoc, Santa Maria, Buellton, and Solvang to the South Coast. The Clean Air Express operates Monday through Friday with thirteen southbound trips in the morning and thirteen northbound trips in the late afternoon. Bi-directional Saturday service was recently implemented between Buellton, Solvang, and the South Coast.
The Clean Air Express has been administered by the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, SBCAG, the City of Lompoc, and the City of Santa Maria. In November 2012, administration of the service was transferred from the City of Santa Maria back to the City of Lompoc. The Clean Air Express is funded solely by Measure A and SBCAG is the Clean Air Express policy board. In FY 2014/15, the Clean Air Express had 227,770 boardings and achieved a farebox recovery ratio of 79 percent.
San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA) Route 10 SLORTA Route 10 is operated by the San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority. It provides bi-directional, fixed-route, inter-county service between San Luis Obispo County and the City of Santa Maria. Route 10 operates Monday through Friday from 6:00 AM to 9:45 PM, Saturday from 8:00 AM to 7:45 PM, and Sunday from 8:00 AM to 6:45 PM. In Santa Maria, it serves the SMAT Transit Center, the Amtrak station, the Greyhound station, Allan Hancock College, and Marian Medical Center. It also serves Cal Poly (California Polytechnic State University) in San Luis Obispo As a public entity that provides non-commuter, fixed-route transit service, SMAT is required by the ADA to provide complementary paratransit service for persons who are unable to use the fixed- route service. SMAT provides its own complementary paratransit service.
SMAT also currently administers the Breeze Bus, which provides service between Santa Maria, Orcutt, Lompoc, Vandenberg Village, and Vandenberg Air Force Base from 5:45 AM to 6:30 PM Monday through Friday and on Saturday. The Breeze also began providing service between Santa Maria, Los Alamos, Buellton, and Solvang in January 2013, as a pilot project.
In FY 2014/15, SMAT had 889,456 boardings system-wide and achieved a farebox recovery ratio of 22 percent.
Transit Priority Areas and High-Quality Transit Corridors No areas in the City of Santa Maria currently have the required bus headways or rail stations to qualify as planning and transit priority areas. Provided they meet all other requirements, projects with the minimum residential densities within these areas can qualify as “transit priority projects” as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21155(b) that would be eligible for streamlined environmental review under CEQA.
To inform future transit investments, and with an eye to future application of Senate Bill 743’s CEQA streamlining provisions, designates certain areas possessing the requisite residential densities, but not yet the minimum transit frequencies, as future planning and transit priority areas. At such time as future transit enhancements increase bus frequencies sufficiently along
15 these routes to meet the definition of “major transit stop” or “high-quality transit corridor” and requisite, additional programmatic environmental review has been completed, these areas would also eligible for consideration as planning and transit priority areas. Areas within the vicinity of rail stations meet the definition of transit priority areas and improvements to rail services will not result in changes.
Figures 2 shows parcels with at least 25 percent of their area falling within one-half mile of a future planning and transit priority areas (i.e., passenger rail transit station and/or a high-quality transit corridor). Office or residential projects located within these parcels may be presumed to have less than significant VMT impacts. The City may wish to set additional criteria such as provision or availability of active transportation infrastructure for application of this screening option.
Figure 2. Half Mile Buffer of Potential Future Santa Maria Transit Priority Area
16 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
Infrastructure projects that would not likely lead to a substantial or measurable increase in vehicle travel, and therefore generally should not require an induced travel analysis, include:
Rehabilitation, maintenance, replacement, safety, and repair projects including ITS field elements such as cameras, message signs, detection, or signals; tunnels; transit systems; and assets that serve bicycle and pedestrian facilities and that do not add additional motor vehicle capacity
Roadside safety devices or hardware installation such as median barriers and guardrails Roadway shoulder enhancements to provide “refuge area,” dedicated space for use only by transit vehicles, to provide bicycle access, or to otherwise improve safety, but which will not be used as automobile vehicle travel lanes
Addition of an auxiliary lane of less than one mile in length Intersection channelization (installation, removal, or reconfiguration of traffic lanes that are not for through traffic, such as turn pockets, turn lanes, or emergency breakdown lanes) Addition of roadway capacity on local or collector streets provided the project also substantially improves conditions for pedestrians, cyclists, and, if applicable, transit Conversion of existing general purpose lanes (including ramps) to managed lanes or transit lanes, or changing lane management in a manner that would not substantially increase vehicle travel
Addition of a new lane that is permanently restricted to use only by transit vehicles Reduction in number of through lanes
Grade separation to separate vehicles from rail, transit, pedestrians or bicycles, or to replace a lane in order to separate preferential vehicles (e.g., HOV, HOT, or trucks) from general vehicles
Installation, removal, or reconfiguration of traffic control devices, including Transit Signal Priority (TSP) features
Installation of traffic metering systems, detection systems, cameras, changeable message signs and other electronics designed to optimize vehicle, bicycle, or pedestrian flow Timing of signals to optimize vehicle, bicycle, or pedestrian flow Installation of roundabouts or traffic circles
Installation or reconfiguration of traffic calming devices Adoption of or increase in tolls
Addition of tolled lanes, where tolls are sufficient to mitigate VMT increase Initiation of new transit service
Conversion of streets from one-way to two-way operation with no net increase in number of traffic lanes
17 Removal or relocation of off-street or on-street parking spaces Adoption or modification of on-street parking or loading restrictions (including meters, time limits, accessible spaces, and preferential/reserved parking permit programs) Addition of traffic wayfinding signage
Addition of new or enhanced bike or pedestrian facilities on existing streets/highways or within existing public rights-of-way
Addition of Class I bike paths, trails, multi-use paths, or other off-road facilities Installation of publicly available alternative fuel/charging infrastructure Addition of passing lanes, truck climbing lanes, or truck brake-check lanes in rural areas
PROJECT LOCATION SCREENING
The OPR technical guidance discusses screening of residential and office projects based on location.
Residential and office projects that locate in areas with low VMT, and that incorporate similar features will also tend to generate similarly low VMT. Maps showing areas of the City that exhibit “low” VMT characteristics can be used to screen residential and office projects from needing to prepare a CEQA VMT analysis.
Project-level VMT is assessed against statewide, regional, or local averages, per capita or per employee depending on the Project type. It is critical, therefore, that the City carefully considers and establishes baseline averages that reflect the travel behavior of their residents and employees.
This baseline will be the measuring stick that all future projects will be measured against, until baselines are updated.
The regional SBCAG RTDM was utilized to estimate trip-based Work and Residential Baseline VMT for the incorporated areas of the City. The SBCAG model runs in the TransCAD software platform and has a base year of 2010 and a forecast year of 2040. The model generates trips based on the land uses and where people will live, work, study and shop, taking into account forecasted population growth. The model generates and tracks all trip types by all modes originating or ending in each jurisdiction within Santa Barbara County (considered “internal” trips), as well as all trips (not separated by trip purpose) from or into Ventura and San Luis Obispo Counties (considered “External” trips). The use of the SBCAG RTDM for evaluation of VMT and associated trip distances is limited to the boundary of the three counties.
The base year 2010 model was utilized to estimate baseline VMT for the City of Santa Maria. The SBCAG RTDM produces trips by different trip purposes and modes and provides VMT as an output.
To estimate trips associated with Residential VMT, all Home-Based vehicular trips (HBx) internal to Santa Barbara County, and external trips between Santa Barbara County and San Luis Obispo and Ventura Counties (“IX” trips in the below table), were selected for evaluation of VMT per capita. To estimate trips associated with Work VMT, only Home-Base-Work (HBW) vehicular trips and “IX” trips were selected for evaluation.
18 Baseline VMT maps have been prepared for the City of Santa Maria using the SBCAG travel demand model. Figures 2, 3, and 4 show the VMT generation rates for non-residential uses across the City of Santa Maria relative to three potential baseline average geographies: Countywide Average Baseline; Areawide Average Baseline (includes Orcutt Area); and, Citywide Average Baseline.
Figures 5, 6, and 7 show the VMT generation rates for residential uses across the City of Santa Maria relative to the same three baseline geographies. The figures are based on the proposed VMT per service population metrics identified in Table 5. Table 6 shows the number of TAZs that meet a given baseline geography threshold for residential and non-residential uses.
The maps show the VMT generation rates for each land use type by Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ). Projects located in TAZs that are shown in green would be presumed to generate VMT at 85 percent or less of the baseline average rate and have less than significant transportation impacts and would require no further VMT analysis. Projects located in the TAZs shown in yellow would be presumed to generate VMT at more than 85 percent but less than the baseline average rate (i.e. above the recommended threshold) and would require VMT mitigation analysis. Projects located in the TAZs shown in red would be presumed to generate VMT above the regional baseline average rate and would require a VMT analysis. Projects located in the “red” TAZs, especially those in suburban greenfield sites, would be the most challenging to mitigate.
Table 5. Threshold of Significance by Baseline Geography
Table 6. Number of TAZs Below Thresholds
Area for Average Threshold
No. TAZs
Below
Threshold
Home Based Work (VMT per Employee)
County 9.41 41
Santa Maria Area 10.20 46
City 9.90 44
Home‐Based (VMT per Population)
County 6.17 56
Santa Maria Area 5.02 29
City 4.47 19
19 Figure 3. Countywide Average: HBW VMT/employee (for Non-Residential Land uses)
20 Figure 4. Areawide Average: HBW VMT/employee (for Non-Residential Land uses)
21 Figure 5. Citywide Average: HBW VMT/employee (for Non-Residential Land uses)
22 Figure 6. Countywide Average: Home-Based Trips VMT/Population (for Residential uses)
23 Figure 7. Areawide Average: Home-Based Trips VMT/Population (for Residential uses)
24 Figure 8. Citywide Average: Home-Based Trips VMT/Population (for Residential uses)
25 PROPOSED VMT EVALUATION CRITERIA
DKS recommends a variation on the OPR Technical Advisory land use type criteria to account for uses commonly found in the City. DKS proposes that the City of Santa Maria assess land development projects according to the primary proposed land use type, as follows:
Residential VMT – Establish baseline VMT and threshold on a per capita basis. “Residential” uses include, but are not limited to, single-family, multi-family, and mobile homes.
Work VMT – Establish baseline VMT and threshold on a per employee basis. “Work” uses include, but are not limited to, office, office parks, light industrial, industrial, warehousing, manufacturing, and business parks.
Retail VMT – Measure net VMT within boundary, and determine threshold based on net change. “Retail” uses include, but are not limited to, supermarkets, restaurants, gas stations, wineries, agriculture tourism, and hotels. Public and recreational uses such as parks, hospitals, libraries, and public services may also be assessed in this way, if needed.
Mixed-Use Projects – Evaluate each component independently using the above thresholds, considering credit for internal capture, OR evaluate dominant use.
Redevelopment Projects - Measured based on net change in VMT for total area.
Infrastructure Projects - Measured based on net change in VMT for total area.
Screening Criteria – DKS recommends OPR’s proposed screening criteria. Decision points that the City needs to weigh in on include:
Baseline Geography
Countywide
Areawide
Citywide
Low Income Housing
100% or;
A portion defined as Low Income Housing
Local serving retail
OPR’s < 50,000 sq.ft. or,
Choose more restrictive project size.
26 VMT ANALYSIS AND MITIGATION
VMT ANALYSIS
Projects that are not screened out using one of the methods described previously will require a formal VMT analysis. Project VMT rates based on location may be taken directly from the screening maps or tables, requiring no additional VMT calculations. Larger projects or those that would significantly alter existing or planned land uses will require project specific VMT calculations. Such projects may be analyzed by inputting the project land uses into a companion VMT Sketch Planning Tool being developed as part of this study. The VMT Sketch Planning Tool will be informed through numerous independent select zone analyses using the SBCAG RTDM. This tool will be available to City staff to aid in this process.
While the VMT data is only available for a base year, SB 743 VMT analysis may require the development of VMT estimates for a ‘future’ year. Baseline is a CEQA term that generally refers to the year when a project’s notice of preparation (NOP) is released. Hence, it may be necessary to interpolate between base and future year VMT estimates to create a specific baseline year value.
Spreadsheets containing the base and future year data, and where interpolation calculations can be performed, will be transmitted separately to the City of Santa Maria.
VMT MITIGATION
The California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) report on the effectiveness of various VMT mitigation strategies was used as the operable resource document for identifying the most suitable project level VMT mitigation strategies for the City of Santa Maria. Table 7 summarizes the recommended measures and their documented range of effectiveness. Additional detail on calculation methods for each method may be found in Appendix A.
Although the effect of multiple mitigation strategies is additive, CAPCOA establishes overall caps on maximum effectiveness when more than one mitigation strategy is applied. The recommended caps vary by land use context as follows:
Urban settings – 75 percent maximum VMT reduction
Compact infill settings – 35 percent maximum VMT reduction Suburban settings – 15 percent maximum VMT reduction
Consequently, for some very high VMT locations (see forthcoming screening maps), projects could potentially be unmitigable if located within suburban and/or greenfield settings.
27 CASE STUDY CALCULATIONS
Table 8 provides generic example projects subject to VMT mitigation under the proposed thresholds. As shown, two of the four example projects are not mitigatable with the candidate strategies and would result in a significant and unavoidable impact under CEQA. The examples illustrate the challenges of mitigating VMT at the project site level. This can have the intended effect for applicants to modify their projects by size, type or location to generate less VMT and align with state objectives for greenhouse gas reduction, land use efficiency, energy efficiency, and less overall reliance on the automobile.
MITIGATION FEE PROGRAMS
VMT mitigation banks or exchanges would provide an alternative to mitigating VMT impacts at the project site level. With a mitigation bank, developers would pay a fee in lieu of specific on-site mitigation measures. The combined fees would then be used to pay for mitigation projects across the City. With a mitigation exchange, developers would select from a pre-approved list of mitigation projects throughout the City.
Any such mitigation fee program or exchange would need to support its mitigation estimates with rigorous analysis and would be subject to the legal requirements of CEQA (i.e., CEQA mitigation monitoring requirements) and the California Mitigation Fee Act. As such, this option would not be a quick or easy undertaking. However, if the City finds over the first few years of adopting VMT thresholds that desirable projects are consistently difficult to mitigate, it may wish to pursue this option. This could be done in conjunction with the next general plan or transportation impact fee update.
28 TABLE 7. MITIGATION STRATEGIES
STRATEGY
DESCRIPTION
REPORTED
RANGE OF
EFFECTIVENESS
NOTES
LAND USE MEASURES
INCREASE DENSITY This measure involves increasing the density of the proposed project. 0.8-30%
Project density will be
somewhat determined by
zoning. Also, increased project
densities may result in LOS or
other effects during local
transportation analysis.
INCREASE DIVERSITY OF
URBAN AND SUBURBAN
DEVELOPMENTS (MIXED USE)
Involves including more than a single land
use(s) in the proposed project. 9-30%
INTEGRATE AFFORDABLE AND
BELOW MARKET RATE
HOUSING
While housing developments that are 100
percent affordable may be presumed less than
significant, this method provides credit for
partially affordable developments.
0.04-1.2%
Literature supports only a
modest VMT reduction for
partially affordable
developments.
IMPROVE DESIGN OF
DEVELOPMENT (INCREASING
NETWORK CONNECTIVITY)
This measure is only appropriate for larger
developments and should be implemented in
conjunction with complete sidewalk coverage,
pedestrian crossings, street trees and other
design elements that support a pedestrian-
oriented environment
3-21% Based on intersections per
square mile.
NEIGHBORHOOD/SITE ENHANCEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN NETWORK
IMPROVEMENTS
Provide a pedestrian access network that
internally links all uses and connects to all
existing or planned external streets and
1-2% Would need to develop set of
standards for pedestrian
29 TABLE 7. MITIGATION STRATEGIES
STRATEGY
DESCRIPTION
REPORTED
RANGE OF
EFFECTIVENESS
NOTES
pedestrian facilities contiguous with the project
site, minimize barriers to pedestrian access and
interconnectivity, eliminate physical barriers
such as walls, landscaping, and slopes that
impede pedestrian circulation.
connections that go "above and
beyond" existing requirements.
PROVIDE TRAFFIC CALMING
MEASURES
Project design will include pedestrian/bicycle
safety and traffic calming measures in excess
of jurisdiction requirements.
0.25-1%
Depends on percent of project
intersections and streets where
improvements are provided.
PROVIDE BIKE PARKING IN
NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
A non-residential project will provide short-
term and long-term bicycle parking facilities to
meet peak season maximum demand.
0.63%
Not recommended as a stand-
alone strategy in the CAPCOA
report but alternative literature
cites a modest 0.625%
reduction.
PARKING POLICY/PRICING
LIMIT PARKING SUPPLY
The project will change parking requirements
and types of supply within the project site to
encourage “smart growth” development and
alternative transportation choices by project
residents and employees.
5-12.5% May conflict with existing
parking requirements.
UNBUNDLE PARKING COSTS
This project will unbundle parking costs from
property costs. Unbundling separates parking
from property costs, requiring those who wish
to purchase parking spaces to do so at an
additional cost from the property cost.
2.6-13%
Unbundle costs for parking
from building rent. Santa Maria
market may not support this
measure.
30 TABLE 7. MITIGATION STRATEGIES
STRATEGY
DESCRIPTION
REPORTED
RANGE OF
EFFECTIVENESS
NOTES
VOLUNTARY PARTICIPATION
IN COMMUTE TRIP
REDUCTION PROGRAM
Sites participating in a commute trip reduction
program apply strategies such as preferential
carpool parking and subsidized transit passes.
1-6.2%
Source: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, August 2010.
30 TABLE 8. SAMPLE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS
PROJECT (SEE BELOW FOR DESCRIPTION): 1 2 3 4
BASELINE VMT PER UNIT 44.5 86.9 71.8 47.7
THRESHOLD 44.0 64.8 61.6 44.0
VMT REDUCTIONS (PERCENT):
INCORPORATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING 0.083
IMPROVE NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIVITY 0.013
PEDESTRIAN NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS 0.020 0.006 0.020
PROVIDE TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES 0.008 0.010
PROVIDE BIKE PARKING 0.006
UNBUNDLED PARKING COSTS 1 0.136
VOLUNTARY TRIP REDUCTION PROGRAM 2 0.054
TOTAL VMT REDUCTION 3 0.02 0.20 (0.15) 0.04 0.09
VMT AFTER MITIGATION 43.61 69.30 68.87 43.26
MITIGATED IMPACT? Yes No No Yes
Projects: A) Multifamily Residential; B) Office Building, C) 100 Unit Single Family Residential Project; D) 200 Unit Apartment Complex
Notes:
a) Assumes $200 monthly parking charge and $6,000 annual ownership cost b) Assumes suburban center effectiveness rate and 100% eligibility c) CAPCOA report recommends capping total reductions at 15% for suburban locations
31 REFERENCES
Office of Planning and Research. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, December 2018.
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, August 2010.
SANTA MARIA SB 743 IMPLEMENTATION • DRAFT PROCEDURES • JUNE 2020 A-1
APPENDIX – VMT MITIGATION CALCULATION
METHODS
SANTA MARIA SB 743 IMPLEMENTATION • DRAFT PROCEDURES • JUNE 2020 A-2
This appendix presents calculation methods for the VMT mitigation strategies proposed for use in Santa Maria. The calculation methods may be implanted in standardized spreadsheet templates.
LAND USE MEASURES
INCREASE DENSITY
Inputs: Number of housing units or jobs per acre for development site Calculation: Percent VMT reduction (capped at 30 percent) = A*B where A is the percent increase in jobs or housing units per acre for the site and B is the elasticity of VMT with respect to density.
A is calculated as
(Housing units per acre-7.6)/7.6 or
(Jobs per acre-20/20)
The CAPCOA report recommends that A be capped at 500 percent and the overall VMT reduction be capped at 30 percent. The factor for B recommended by CAPCOA is 0.07.
INCREASE DIVERSITY (ADD MIXED USE TO PROJECT)
Inputs: Percentage of each land use type in the project (building floor area) Calculation: Percent VMT reduction = Land Use Change * B where:
𝐿𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑈𝑠𝑒 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑥 ሺ𝐿𝑈𝐼ሻ ൌ െ𝑎
lnሺ6ሻ
𝑎ൌ 𝑎 lnሺ𝑎 ሻ
ୀଵ
𝐿𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑈𝑠𝑒 𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 ൌ 𝐿𝑈𝐼 െ 0.15
0.15 ai = building floor area of land use/total square feet of area considered a1 = single family residential
a2= multifamily residential
SANTA MARIA SB 743 IMPLEMENTATION • DRAFT PROCEDURES • JUNE 2020 A-3
a3 = commercial
a4 = industrial
a5 = institutional
a6 = park
If land use is not present, set ai equal to 0.01
B is the elasticity of VMT with respect to land use index (LUI) and 0.09 is the recommended value.
Note that the OPR guidance recommends analyzing the residential and employment land uses of a mixed-use project separately. However, this method could be applied to reduce the VMT of each use in cases where mitigation is required.
INTEGRATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING
While housing developments that are 100 percent affordable may be presumed less than significant with respect to VMT, this method provides credit for partially affordable developments.
Inputs: Percent of residential units that are deed-restricted for extremely low income (ELI), very low income (VLI), and low-income households (LI).
Method: Percent VMT Reduction = (Percent ELI Units) (32.5) + (%VLI Units)(25.2) + (% LI Units)(10.2)
IMPROVE DESIGN OF DEVELOPMENT (INCREASE NETWORK CONNECTIVITY) Inputs: Number of intersections per square mile
Method: Percent VMT Reduction = Intersections *B
Where Intersections = Percent increase in intersections versus a typical suburban development = (Project Intersections per Square Mile-36)/36
B=elasticity of VMT with respect to intersections (0.12 is recommended value from literature).
This measure is only appropriate for larger developments and should be implemented in conjunction with complete sidewalk coverage, pedestrian crossings, street trees and other design elements that support a pedestrian-oriented environment. Note that the value of the Intersections factor should be capped at 500 percent.
SANTA MARIA SB 743 IMPLEMENTATION • DRAFT PROCEDURES • JUNE 2020 A-4
NEIGHBORHOOD AND SITE ENHANCEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS
Inputs: Information about pedestrian access and connectivity within the project site and connecting to off-site destinations.
Method: The VMT reduction is applied according to the table below.
ESTIMATED VMT REDUCTION EXTENT OF PEDESTRIAN
ACCOMMODATIONS CONTEXT
2% Within Project Site and
Connecting Off-Site Urban/Suburban
1% Within Project Site Urban/Suburban
<1% Within Project Site and
Connecting Off-Site Rural
Source: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, August 2010.
PROVIDE TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES
This measure is applicable for larger developments and where improvements extend beyond the project frontage.
Inputs: Percent of streets and intersections within project site with traffic calming improvements.
Method: The VMT reduction is applied according to the table below.
% STREETS WITH IMPROVEMENTS
25% 50% 75% 100%
PERCENT VMT REDUCTION
%
INTERSECTION
S WITH
IMPROVEMENT
S
25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.5% 0.5%
50% 0.25% 0.5% 0.5% 0.75%
75% 0.5% 0.5% 0.75% 0.75%
100% 0.5% 0.75% 0.75% 1%
Source: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, August 2010.
SANTA MARIA SB 743 IMPLEMENTATION • DRAFT PROCEDURES • JUNE 2020 A-5
PROVIDE BIKE PARKING IN NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
This strategy has minimal impact as a stand-alone measure and should be implemented in conjunction with enhanced street network characteristics and bicycle facilities.
Inputs: Information on short term and long terms bicycle parking facilities sized to meet peak maximum demand.
Method: VMT is reduced by 0.625%.
PARKING PRICING AND POLICY
LIMIT PARKING SUPPLY
This mitigation strategy involves providing less parking than required by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual. This strategy may conflict with municipal code parking requirements.
Inputs: ITE parking generate rate for project site and actual parking provision rate for project site.
Method: 𝑃𝑐𝑡 𝑉𝑀𝑇 𝑅𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ൌ
ሺ௧௨ ௩௦ିூ்ா ீ௧ ோ௧ሻ
ூ்ா ீ௧ ோ௧ ∗ 0.5
UNBUNDLE PARKING COSTS FROM PROPERTY COST
This strategy involves charging for parking on a separate basis from other property costs. For example, apartment or office rent would be separate from parking space rental. This strategy would involve ongoing monitoring to make sure it continues to be enforced.
Inputs: Monthly parking cost for project site.
Method: Percent VMT Reduction = Change in vehicle ownership cost * elasticity * A Where
elasticity of vehicle ownership with respect to total vehicle costs = -0.4 Change in vehicle ownership cost = Monthly parking cost*12/annual vehicle ownership cost A = 85% (adjustment from vehicle ownership to VMT)
COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION PROGRAMS
This VMT mitigation strategy would expand participation in this TDM program to all sites requiring VMT mitigation. The research cited for this strategy assumes that the TDM program will include
SANTA MARIA SB 743 IMPLEMENTATION • DRAFT PROCEDURES • JUNE 2020 A-6
carpooling, ride matching, preferential carpool parking, flexible work schedules for carpools, a half- time transportation coordinator, vanpool assistance, bicycle parking, showers, and locker facilities.
Inputs: Percentage of employees eligible for program and location of project site (low density suburb, suburban center, or urban location).
Method:
Percent VMT Reduction = Percent reduction in commute VMT * Percent employees eligible Where percent reduction in commute VMT is 5.2% (low density suburb), 5.4% (suburban center), or 6.2% (urban).
CITY OF SANTA MARIA
SB 743 & Vehicle Miles of Travel Policy Options
City of Santa Maria Planning Commission
August 5, 2020
Jim Damkowitch and Erin Vaca, DKS Associates
[email protected]
[email protected]
Kari Zajac, Rincon Consultants, Inc
[email protected]
1/ BACKGROUND
• Legislative and Regulatory Changes
• VMT as an Impact
• Measurement Tools
• LOS vs VMT
• Mitigation and Screening Criteria
2/ DECISIONS
• Establishment of baselines
• Thresholds of Significance
• Retention of LOS as Local Policy
3/ NEXT STEPS
• Adopt baselines and thresholds of
significance
• Refine screening procedures
• Develop sketch planning tool
• Revise transportation impact analysis
guidelines
BACKGROUND:
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT AND VEHICLE MILES
TRAVELLED (VMT) AS A MEASURE
OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACT
LEGISLATIVE TIMELINE
• State Bill (SB) 743 was signed into law in 2013, with the intent to better align California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) practices with statewide sustainability goals related to efficient land use, greater multi-modal choices, and greenhouse gas reductions • Governor’s Office of Planning and Research published technical guidance on implementation in December 2018.
• Natural Resources Agency adopted changes to CEQA Guidelines in December 2019 specifying Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) as the metric for quantifying transportation impacts under CEQA. • As of July 1, 2020, delay-based metrics such as Level of Service (LOS) may no longer be used to quantify transportation impacts under CEQA.
CEQA SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLD
ABOVE BASED ON OPR GUIDANCE
• CEQA Impacts determined relative to Thresholds
• Mitigation – specific measure(s) to avoid or reduce impacts to below the significance threshold
• Impact determinations:
> Less than significant
> Less than significant with mitigation
> Significant and unavoidable
LOS VMT
Housing Development
Project
SOURCE: GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF PLANNING & RESEARCH, FEBRUARY 2016 Housing Development
Project
Relatively fewer vehicle
tripstaken(lowVMT)
SOURCE: GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF PLANNING & RESEARCH, FEBRUARY 2016 Housing
Development Project
Relatively little vehicle
travel loaded onto the
network(lowVMT)
…but numerous LOS
impacts
SOURCE: GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF PLANNING & RESEARCH, FEBRUARY 2016 Housing
Development Project
SOURCE: GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF PLANNING & RESEARCH, FEBRUARY 2016 Housing Development
Project
More and longer vehicle
trips relative toinfill
development (more VMT)
SOURCE: GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF PLANNING & RESEARCH, FEBRUARY 2016 Housing
Development Project
More and longer vehicle
trips relative to infill
development (more VMT)
…but relatively few
LOS impacts
SOURCE: GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF PLANNING & RESEARCH, FEBRUARY 2016 LEVEL OF SERVICE (PRE JULY 1, 2020)
TRAFFIC
COUNTS
ESTABLISH
BASELINE
LOCATION
SPECIFIC
MITIGATION
TYPICALLY
INVOLVES
ADDING
ROADWAY
CAPACITY
MEASURING VMT
VMT
BASELINE
MODELED
SYSTEMWIDE
ASSESSMENT
MUST REFLECT
THE FULL TRIP
LENGTH
MITIGATION FOCUSED ON LAND USE
AND PROGRAMS THAT REDUCE VMT
MEASURING VMT: TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS
MEASURING VMT
• SBCAG TRAVEL DEMAND
MODEL – CALCULATE VMT
EFFICIENCY METRICS
• SKETCH PLANNING TOOLS –
EMULATE TRAVEL DEMAND
MODEL OUTPUT AND CAN
QUICKLY CALCULATE VMT
MITIGATION EFFECTS
SETTING THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
• Residential uses – 15% below existing baseline
• Office/Service/Manufacturing/Industrial uses – 15% below existing baseline
• Retail uses – net VMT impact
• Other uses – net VMT impact
• Infrastructure – net VMT impact
Net VMT Change
• Roadway Maintenance and Rehab Projects
• Signal Timing / Synchronization / Adaptive Signal Control /Signal Preemption
• Intersection Control Type and Turn Lane Channelization • Widening for Local or Local Collector Streets
• Transit/Bicycle/Pedestrian Infrastructure
POTENTIAL VMT SCREENING CRITERIA – INFRASTRUCTURE
PROJECTS
POTENTIAL VMT SCREENING CRITERIA – LAND USE
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
ABOVE BASED ON OPR RECOMMENDATIONS
• Proximity (1/2 mile) to high quality transit (not currently applicable to Santa Maria)
• Small projects (<110 daily trips)
• Affordable housing developments
• Local serving retail (<50,000 sq.ft. for individual establishment) • Location in low VMT generating area (development of screening maps)
COUNTYWIDE
AVERAGE
• HOME-BASED WORK
VMT/EMPLOYEE*
• APPLICABLE TO
NON-RESIDENTIAL
LAND USES
*Plus portion of travel into and out of County
AREA AVERAGE
• HOME-BASED WORK
VMT/EMPLOYEE*
• APPLICABLE TO
NON-RESIDENTIAL
LAND USES
*Plus portion of travel into and out of County
CITY AVERAGE
• HOME-BASED WORK
VMT/EMPLOYEE*
• APPLICABLE TO NON-
RESIDENTIAL LAND USES
*Plus portion of travel into and out of County
COUNTYWIDE
AVERAGE
• HOME-BASED TRIPS
VMT/POPULATION
• APPLICABLE TO
RESIDENTIAL USES
*Plus portion of travel into and out of County
AREA AVERAGE
HOME-BASED TRIPS
VMT/POPULATION
• APPLICABLE TO
RESIDENTIAL USES
*Plus portion of travel into and out of County
CITY AVERAGE
• HOME-BASED TRIPS
VMT/POPULATION
• APPLICABLE TO
RESIDENTIAL USES
*Plus portion of travel into and out of County
VMT MITIGATION
• Programmatic mitigation
> Ongoing actions project occupants have to do over the life of the entitlement (e.g. TDM programs, subsidized transit passes)
• Non-programmatic mitigation
> Changes to project that inherently reduces VMT production (e.g. locate near transit, include affordable housing, add active transportation infrastructure) • Banks and Exchanges
> Low VMT projects sell or exchange VMT credits to high VMT projects Example Projects
Project Description Screened
? Mitigatable? Notes
1. Maxco Agricultural Box
Center
Industrial project at
1550 West Stowell
Rd
No Possibly (requires
separate analysis)
Need to focus on
employee VMT (light
duty vehicles)
2. Rancho Harvest
Zoning change
from industrial to
commercial mixed
use (C-2)
No Employment uses – yes.
Residential uses – no (but
requires separate
analysis)
3. California Truck Center
Expansion of facility
for commercial
vehicle sales, parts,
and repair (40 KSF)
Possibly Employment use will be
difficult to mitigate at site
level
Same TAZ as
Project #1
(additional analysis
required to remove
potential truck
VMT).
4. Refugio Townhomes
125 multifamily
units at 237 W
McCoy
Yes N/A Located in low VMT
TAZ – no further
analysis required.
Note: Least restrictive screening thresholds used in example assessments.
Example Projects – with “Countywide” Map
Note: Least restrictive screening thresholds used in example assessments.
DECISIONS
ESTABLISHMENT OF BASELINE GEOGRAPHY
The City must select a baseline to establish thresholds of significance for residential and employment land uses.
SOURCE: DKS ASSOCIATES, 2020
BASELINE CHOICE (COUNTYWIDE; AREA WIDE; CITYWIDE)
• Residential Uses: Citywide Average Most Restrictive
• Residential Uses: Countywide Average Least Restrictive • Non-Residential Uses: All Baselines are Similar
ESTABLISHMENT OF THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
The City must select a VMT baseline (efficiency metric) and threshold of significance for residential and employment land uses.
SOURCE: DKS ASSOCIATES, 2020
AVERAGE VMT PER SERVICE POPULATION BY GEOGRAPHIC AREA (2010 BASELINE SCENARIO) Geographic Area Average 85% Average
Home Based Work (VMT per Employee )
Santa Barbara County 11.08 9.41
Santa Maria Area (+Orcutt) 12.00 10.20
Santa Maria City 11.65 9.50
Home Based (VMT per Population)
Santa Barbara County 7.26 6.17
Santa Maria Area (+Orcutt) 5.90 5.02
Santa Maria City 5.25 4.47
SOURCE: DKS ASSOCIATES, 2020
• Low Income Housing
• 100% or;
• Consistent with Density Bonus Law
• Senior Housing
• Farmworker Housing
• Local serving retail
• Go with OPR’s < 50,000 sq.ft. or,
• Choose more restrictive project size.
ADDITIONAL SCREENING CRITERIA
RETENTION OF LOS AS LOCAL POLICY
• Can City retain as local policy? – Yes, but it will no longer be considered an impact under CEQA
• General Plan Circulation Element Policy C.1.a:
LOS “D” shall be maintained
Conditions of Approval
• City’s Traffic Impact Fee will not change.
NEXT STEPS
NEXT STEPS
1. Adopt baselines and thresholds of significance
2. Adopt screening criteria
3. Develop and implement sketch planning tool
4. Modify City Traffic Model to be sensitive to SB 743 VMT Analysis
5. Revise transportation impact analysis guidelines
34 PC ACTIONS – STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Recommend the “Countywide” baseline mapping
2. Set Thresholds of Significance (recommending state minimums) a. Residential uses – 15% below existing baseline
b. Office/Service/Manufacturing/Industrial uses – 15% below existing baseline c. Retail uses – net VMT impact
d. Other uses – net VMT impact
e. Infrastructure – net VMT impact
3. Recommend Screening Criteria:
a. Affordable projects based on State Density Bonus Law b. Farmworker Housing
c. Local Retail (less than 50k sq ft)
d. Small projects (less than 110 trips)
e. Map Screening for low VMT areas
THANK YOU
JIM DAMKOWITCH AND ERIN VACA
MANAGING DIRECTOR DKS SACRAMENTO, CA
[email protected]
916.889.7201
8/13/23, 10:11 AM Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney At Law Mail - SWMSRCC [City of Santa Maria, Broadway & Main Street Alvin Newton Mixed-Use] https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=2ceb1c44d7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r2874335392882698255&simpl=msg-a:r-921270714153991800&simpl… 1/6 Stephanie Papayanis <[email protected]>
SWMSRCC [City of Santa Maria, Broadway & Main Street Alvin Newton Mixed-Use] 6 messages
Stephanie Papayanis <[email protected]> Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 1:00 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: Mitchell Tsai <[email protected]>, "Mitchell M. Tsai Attorney at Law, P.C." <[email protected]>, Naira Soghbatyan <[email protected]>
Good afternoon Dana,
I hope you are well. I wanted to touch base with you about the Broadway & Main Street Alvin Newton Mixed-Use Project that will be coming before the Planning Commission on August 16.
Can you advise what the CEQA clearance is for the proposed Project approvals (e.g., EIR, MND, ND, categorical exemption)?
Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
--
Stephanie Papayanis, Esq.
Associate Attorney
Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney At Law
139 South Hudson Avenue Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91101
Phone: (626) 314-3821
Fax: (626) 389-5414
Email: [email protected]
Website: http://www.mitchtsailaw.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages accompanying it, may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (626) 381-9248 and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading them or saving them to disk. Thank you.
Dana Eady <[email protected]> Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 1:57 PM To: Stephanie Papayanis <[email protected]>
Cc: Mitchell Tsai <[email protected]>, "Mitchell M. Tsai Attorney at Law, P.C." <[email protected]>, Naira Soghbatyan <[email protected]>
Hi Stephanie,
We are still working on the final recommendation and details in the staff report regarding environmental review. We will have that completed next week and can provide it to you then.
Thanks so much,
Dana
Cover
Image
Dana Eady
Planning Division Manager
City of Santa Maria
8/13/23, 10:11 AM Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney At Law Mail - SWMSRCC [City of Santa Maria, Broadway & Main Street Alvin Newton Mixed-Use] https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=2ceb1c44d7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r2874335392882698255&simpl=msg-a:r-921270714153991800&simpl… 2/6 110 South Pine Street Suite 101
Santa Maria, CA 93458
Ph: (805) 925 -0951 Ext. 2444
E-mail: [email protected]
The City is updating the General Plan, please see the website for more information and how to get involved!
From: Stephanie Papayanis <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 1:00 PM
To: Dana Eady <[email protected]>
Cc: Mitchell Tsai <[email protected]>; Mitchell M. Tsai Attorney at Law, P.C. <[email protected]>; Naira Soghbatyan <[email protected]> Subject: SWMSRCC [City of Santa Maria, Broadway & Main Street Alvin Newton Mixed-Use]
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please use caution when opening links or attachments.*** Good afternoon Dana,
I hope you are well. I wanted to touch base with you about the Broadway & Main Street Alvin Newton Mixed-Use Project that will be coming before the Planning Commission on August 16.
Can you advise what the CEQA clearance is for the proposed Project approvals (e.g., EIR, MND, ND, categorical exemption)?
Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
--
Stephanie Papayanis, Esq.
Associate Attorney
Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney At Law
139 South Hudson Avenue Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91101
Phone: (626) 314-3821
Fax: (626) 389-5414
Email: [email protected]
Website: http://www.mitchtsailaw.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages accompanying it, may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (626) 381-9248 and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading them or saving them to disk. Thank you.
Stephanie Papayanis <[email protected]> Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 4:07 PM To: Dana Eady <[email protected]>
Cc: Mitchell Tsai <[email protected]>, "Mitchell M. Tsai Attorney at Law, P.C." <[email protected]>, Naira Soghbatyan <[email protected]>
8/13/23, 10:11 AM Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney At Law Mail - SWMSRCC [City of Santa Maria, Broadway & Main Street Alvin Newton Mixed-Use] https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=2ceb1c44d7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r2874335392882698255&simpl=msg-a:r-921270714153991800&simpl… 3/6 Hi Dana,
Thank you for your response. It is my understanding that the Planning Commission (PC), and then the City Council (CC), will be considering a Downtown Permit application for the Project. Will these be the final hearings before the Project gets fully approved and entitled? And will both of these hearings entail an environmental clearance? If so, we would like to have sufficient opportunity to review any environmental documentation on the project and provide comments. Could you provide us with any additional information prior to the 11th on what environmental document is being considered by the Planning Commission and City Council? Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Best,
Stephanie
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 1:58 PM Dana Eady <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Stephanie,
We are still working on the final recommendation and details in the staff report regarding environmental review. We will have that completed next week and can provide it to you then.
Thanks so much,
Dana
Cover
Image
Dana Eady
Planning Division Manager
City of Santa Maria
110 South Pine Street Suite 101
Santa Maria, CA 93458
Ph: (805) 925 -0951 Ext. 2444
E-mail: [email protected]
The City is updating the General Plan, please see the website for more information and how to get involved!
From: Stephanie Papayanis <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 1:00 PM
To: Dana Eady <[email protected]>
Cc: Mitchell Tsai <[email protected]>; Mitchell M. Tsai Attorney at Law, P.C. <[email protected]>; Naira Soghbatyan <[email protected]> Subject: SWMSRCC [City of Santa Maria, Broadway & Main Street Alvin Newton Mixed-Use]
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please use caution when opening links or attachments.*** [Quoted text hidden]
Stephanie Papayanis <[email protected]> Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 12:47 PM To: Dana Eady <[email protected]>
Cc: Mitchell Tsai <[email protected]>, "Mitchell M. Tsai Attorney at Law, P.C." <[email protected]>, Naira Soghbatyan <[email protected]>
8/13/23, 10:11 AM Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney At Law Mail - SWMSRCC [City of Santa Maria, Broadway & Main Street Alvin Newton Mixed-Use] https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=2ceb1c44d7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r2874335392882698255&simpl=msg-a:r-921270714153991800&simpl… 4/6 Hi Dana,
Following up on my email below.
In addition to my questions below, could you advise whether the Project will be providing any affordable housing units? And if so, how many?
Thank you.
Stephanie
[Quoted text hidden]
Dana Eady <[email protected]> Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 2:12 PM To: Stephanie Papayanis <[email protected]>
Cc: Mitchell Tsai <[email protected]>, "Mitchell M. Tsai Attorney at Law, P.C." <[email protected]>, Naira Soghbatyan <[email protected]>, Carol Ziesenhenne <[email protected]>, Chuen Wu <[email protected]>
Hello Stephanie,
Thanks for checking back in, the staff report will be posted this Friday, 8/11 at this link: https://cityofsantamaria.prod. govaccess.org/services/departments/city-clerk-records/agendas-reports-meeting-videos/-fsiteid-1
The PC will be reviewing the project and making a recommendation to the CC, who is the final decision maker on the project. The CC hearing is the final hearing on the project. The CEQA determination is part of the PC and CC review and the recommendation is that the project can be found exempt from CEQA based on the Class 32 (In-Fill Development Projects) Categorical Exemption under Section 15332 of the CEQA guidelines. At this time no affordable units are proposed with this project.
Thanks,
Dana
Dana Eady
Planning Division Manager
City of Santa Maria
110 South Pine Street Suite 101
Santa Maria, CA 93458
Ph: (805) 925 -0951 Ext. 2444
E-mail: [email protected]
8/13/23, 10:11 AM Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney At Law Mail - SWMSRCC [City of Santa Maria, Broadway & Main Street Alvin Newton Mixed-Use] https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=2ceb1c44d7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r2874335392882698255&simpl=msg-a:r-921270714153991800&simpl… 5/6
From: Stephanie Papayanis <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 12:48 PM
To: Dana Eady <[email protected]>
Cc: Mitchell Tsai <[email protected]>; Mitchell M. Tsai Attorney at Law, P.C. <[email protected]>; Naira Soghbatyan <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: SWMSRCC [City of Santa Maria, Broadway & Main Street Alvin Newton Mixed-Use]
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please use caution when opening links or attachments.*** Hi Dana,
Following up on my email below.
In addition to my questions below, could you advise whether the Project will be providing any affordable housing units? And if so, how many?
Thank you.
Stephanie
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 4:07 PM Stephanie Papayanis <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Dana,
Thank you for your response. It is my understanding that the Planning Commission (PC), and then the City Council (CC), will be considering a Downtown Permit application for the Project. Will these be the final hearings before the Project gets fully approved and entitled? And will both of these hearings entail an environmental clearance?
If so, we would like to have sufficient opportunity to review any environmental documentation on the project and provide comments. Could you provide us with any additional information prior to the 11th on what environmental document is being considered by the Planning Commission and City Council?
Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Best,
Stephanie
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 1:58 PM Dana Eady <[email protected]> wrote:
8/13/23, 10:11 AM Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney At Law Mail - SWMSRCC [City of Santa Maria, Broadway & Main Street Alvin Newton Mixed-Use] https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=2ceb1c44d7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r2874335392882698255&simpl=msg-a:r-921270714153991800&simpl… 6/6 Hi Stephanie,
We are still working on the final recommendation and details in the staff report regarding environmental review. We will have that completed next week and can provide it to you then.
Thanks so much,
Dana
Dana Eady
Planning Division Manager
City of Santa Maria
110 South Pine Street Suite 101
Santa Maria, CA 93458
Ph: (805) 925 -0951 Ext. 2444
E-mail: [email protected]
The City is updating the General Plan, please see the website for more information and how to get involved!
[Quoted text hidden]
Stephanie Papayanis <[email protected]> Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 3:14 PM To: Dana Eady <[email protected]>
Cc: Mitchell Tsai <[email protected]>, "Mitchell M. Tsai Attorney at Law, P.C." <[email protected]>, Naira Soghbatyan <[email protected]>, Carol Ziesenhenne <[email protected]>, Chuen Wu <[email protected]>
Thank you for providing this information Dana.
Best regards,
Stephanie
[Quoted text hidden]
EXHIBIT D
-1-
125.320.050
Unknown
Open memorial area
Unknown
Unknown
Mostly hardscape. Minimal trees + shrubs.
0 8,322 (ground floor ) 0 10.6
16,300 17,276 70 22.0
16,300 25,598 70 32.6
1,409 1.8
0 0
* 27,007 29.6
*Total Area = 1.8, however, affected area of work is 0.62. Percentages are based on 0.62ac.
1.8 acres
Public Park,
Parking Structure
Alvin Newton Apartments
SP-Gateway
SE corner Main St & Broadway
Mixed-Use building with ground floor commercial, 4 stories of apartments with a roof top deck. Site to include outdoor plazas, firefighters memorial and parking.
The Vernon Group
706 East Haley Street, Santa Barbara, CA
805.626.0022 [email protected]
X
-2-
Describe the surrounding land uses:
NORTH
SOUTH
EAST
WEST
Is the project located on filled land or on a slope ofl0 percent or more? Are there any cultural, historical or scenic aspects with the project site? Yes
Yes
No
No
Unknown
Unknown
If yes, describe them:
INFORMATION FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS ONLY
Total number of dwelling units: _
Size of dwelling units:
#of Units # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Square Footage
Number of parking spaces provided: covered uncovered
total
INFORMATION FOR LAND DIVISION PROJECTS ONLY
Type of land division: Residential Commercial Industrial Lot Line Adjustment
Number of lots proposed:
Size of lots (indicate range):
INFORMATION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS ONLY
Square footage of the proposed structures: Existing structures (to remain}. _ Days and hours of operation:
Number of total employees and employees per shift:
Daily expected patronage or capacity of the use:
Describe the basic operations/procedures of the proposed use:
Public Park
Bank, parking and shopping mall
Public Parking Structure
Retail shops
X
X
The Firefighters Memorial and Founding Fathers monuments are located on site and will be incorporated into the project 97 53 Studio Units 1 480-560 sf
34 1-bed Units 1 660 sf
10 2-bed Units 2 960 sf
5 79 84
-3-
The proejct has been designed in a manner to be complementary to the Town Center West Redevelopment occuring to the southwest.
This projest is part of, and was analyzed in, the adopted Downtown Specific Plan and subsequent Final Environmental Impact Report.
02.17.23 SAME
-4-
N/A
N/A
N/A
Revised December 2015
8/14/23, 3:38 PM In Memory of William Alvin Newton Historical Marker https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=162079 1/3
Photographed By Andrew Ruppenstein, November 30, 2020
1. In Memory of William Alvin Newton Marker
HMdb.org THE HISTORICAL
MARKER DATABASE “Bite-Size Bits of Local, National, and Global History” Santa Maria in Santa Barbara County, California — The American West (Pacific Coastal) In Memory of William Alvin Newton
Inscription.
In memory of William Alvin Newton
Father, Husband and Firefighter
On April 25, 1970, on this site,
Firefighter Newton made the ultimate
sacrifice to the community,
giving his life fighting the Bradley Hotel
fire.
Fireman's Prayer
When am called to duty, God
wherever flames my rage,
give me strength to save some life
whatever be its age,
help me embrace a little child
before it is too late
or save an older person from
the horror of that fate.
Enable me to be alert and hear the weakest shout
and quickly and efficiently
to put the fire out.
I want to fill my calling and
to give the best in me,
to guard my every neighbor and
protect his property
and if according to my fate
I am to lose my life,
please bless with your protecting hand
my children and my wife.
Topics. This historical marker is listed in this topic list: Heroes. A significant historical date for this entry is April 25, 1970.
Aug. 14, 2023
8/14/23, 3:38 PM In Memory of William Alvin Newton Historical Marker https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=162079 2/3
Click or scan to seethis page online
Photographed By Andrew Ruppenstein, November 30, 2020
2. In Memory of William Alvin Newton Marker -wide view
Location. 34° 57.161′ N, 120° 26.122′ W. Marker is in Santa Maria, California, in Santa Barbara County
. Marker can be reached from the intersection of East Main Street and South Broadway. Touch for map. Marker is in this post office area: Santa Maria CA 93454, United States of America. Touch for directions.
Other nearby markers. At least 8 other markers are within walking distance of this marker. Historical Site of the First Masonic Temple in the County of Santa Barbara (about 300 feet away, measured in a direct line); Santa Maria's Oldest Building (about 400 feet away); IOOF Temple (about 600 feet away); Santa Maria Libraries (approx. ¼ mile away); Reuben Hart Residence (approx. ¼ mile away); Original Masonic Cornerstone of Carnegie Library (approx. ¼ mile away); Santa Maria Valley World War II Memorial (approx. 0.4 miles away); The American Woman Veteran (approx. 0.4 miles away). Touch for a list and map of all markers in Santa Maria.
More about this marker. The marker is mounted to a cement monument in the small plaza at the corner of Cook and Broadway. It would be difficult to see it from the street.
Also see . . . Firefighter Alvin Newton Memorial... (City of Santa Maria press release, June 6, 2013). "Alvin Newton was a 35-year-old father of three and a seven-year veteran of the SMFD, known for being at the center of the action at the fire calls in which he participated. At the Bradley Hotel fire, a large wooden structure which was vacant and scheduled to be demolished, Firefighter Newton was on the top of a retaining wall adjacent to the structure, directing water down on the flames, when the building imploded and he was pulled into the fire. Mr. Newton was also a reserve Santa Maria Police
Officer, and was employed by the City’s
Water Division." (Submitted on December 8, 2020.)
8/14/23, 3:38 PM In Memory of William Alvin Newton Historical Marker https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=162079 3/3
m=162079
Credits. This page was last revised on December 8, 2020. It was originally submitted on December 8, 2020, by Andrew Ruppenstein of Lamorinda, California. This page has been viewed 316 times since then and 57 times this year. Photos: 1, 2. submitted on December 8, 2020, by Andrew Ruppenstein of Lamorinda, California.
Copyright © 2006–2023, Some rights reserved.
NEWS RELEASE
June 6, 2013
Firefighter Alvin Newton Memorial to Air on Santa Maria Community Television
Alvin Newton, a Reserve Firefi ghter with the City of Santa Maria Fire Department, died fighting the Bradley Hotel fire on the evening of April 25, 1970. On the 43 rd anniversary
of this tragic loss, a memorial service in his honor was held at t he site of the former hotel, on the southeast corner of Broadway and Main streets in Santa Maria, as part of the year-long 100 th anniversary observance of the f ounding of the Santa Maria Fire Department.
Santa Maria Community Television videotaped the service and will be broadcasting the program starting Monday, June 10 on the Government Channe l, Comcast Cable 23, in the Santa Maria/Orcutt service area. Pl ayback times will be 7:30 p.m. on Mondays, 1:00 p.m. on Wednesdays, and 6:00 p.m. on Sundays through July 8.
Alvin Newton was a 35-year-old father of th ree and a seven-year veteran of the SMFD, known for being at the center of the action at the fire calls in which he participated. At the Bradley Hotel fire, a large wooden struct ure which was vacant and scheduled to be demolished, Firefighter Newton was on the t op of a retaining wall adjacent to the structure, directing water dow n on the flames, when the building imploded and he was pulled into the fire. Mr. Ne wton was also a reserve Santa Maria Police Officer, and was employed by the City’s Water Division.
Speakers included Mayor Alice Patino, SMFD Fire Chief Dan Orr, and Randy Newton, son of Alvin Newton, as well as several retired and current members of the SMFD. The Santa Maria Police Department Honor Guard and the Centra l Coast Pipes and Drums also participated.
Questions may be directed to Santa Maria Community Television, 925-0951 ext. 501.
Department: Santa Maria Community Television
Contact Person: Alan Sutterfield, Station Manager
Telephone Number: (805) 925-0951 ext. 501
E-mail Address: [email protected]