Cities Index.
Agenda

Santa Maria City Council
May 7, 2024

Document
Agenda
Meeting
May 7, 2024
Body
Santa Maria City Council
Pages
12
Original file
34.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-santamaria.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

Mayor Alice Patino
Mayor Pro-Tem Gloria Soto
Councilmember Mike Cordero
Councilmember Carlos Escobedo
Councilmember Maribel Aguilera-Hernandez

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

Tuesday, May 7, 2024
CLOSED SESSION - 4:30 P.M.

REGULAR SESSION - 5:30 P.M.

Oral Comments during the meeting:

In-person format. Attend the meeting in-person in the City Hall Council Chambers at 110 East Cook Street, Santa Maria, and submit a request to speak to the Clerk or City staff. •
Zoom Meeting Portal. Participate via Zoom to register to speak during the Public Comment portion of the meeting or on a particular Agenda Item. Use the Zoom link below or dial-in via telephone.
•
Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_fkWMfcLxTSy4ij21eH5lbA Dial Phone #: 1-669-900-9128**
Webinar ID #: 819 5556 5288
**Press *6 to un-mute your phone. Press *9 to raise your hand to speak.

Watch an instructional Video on Participating using Zoom.

Public Written Comments prior to the meeting (must be received by 2:00 p.m. in advance of the meeting*):

Email - Submit Comments via email to [email protected]. In the body of your email, please include the date of the meeting and the item number (if applicable). Emails will not be read aloud during the meeting.
•
Mail - Delivered by the U.S. Postal Service. Address letters to the City Council, Attn.: City Clerk's Office at 110 East Cook Street, Santa Maria, CA 93454. Letters will not be read aloud during the meeting.
•
*All written correspondence will be distributed to Councilmembers and attached to the associated meeting agenda (under Public Comment or Agenda Item); however, submissions received after the deadline will not be processed until the following day.

How to watch the meeting from home:

Comcast Channel 23 - Live during the meeting, and rebroadcast on Thursday at 9:00 a.m. after the meeting and again on Tuesday at 5:30 p.m. the following week.

1. Live Webcast - Online from the Agenda Center & Meetings Portal (select meeting date) or at https://video.isilive.ca/santamaria/live.html. Note - When no meeting is streaming, the window will read "Searching for live stream."

2. You Tube Live Stream - You Tube Webcast.

Note: Live Webcast and You Tube Live are typically available within 15 minutes before the start of the meeting. There is a delay of about 15-30 seconds with both the Live Webcast and You Tube Live Stream.

3. Zoom Meeting Portal - Registration is required (link above) even for observing the meeting.4.

American Disability Act Accommodations:

Any member of the public who needs accommodations should email the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected] or call 805-925-0951 x2306. The City Clerk’s Office will use its best efforts to provide reasonable accommodation by request at least 48 hours ahead of the meeting.

CLOSED SESSION

1. CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez, Councilmember Cordero, Councilmember Escobedo, Councilmember Soto, and Mayor Patino

2. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
In-person oral comments will be accepted during this time. There is no Zoom participation available for the Closed Session Public Comment period. Written comments may be submitted per the instructions above.

3. RECESS-CLOSED SESSION
The City Council will immediately recess to a closed session for the following:

3.a Conference with Labor Negotiators, Pursuant to California Government Code §54957.6
Agency Representative: Interim City Manager Alex Posada, Interim Human Resources Officer Dawn Jackson, and Negotiations Team.

Employee Organizations: All bargaining units, unrepresented employees, managers, and executives.

3.b Public Employee Recruitment - City Manager, Pursuant to California Government Code §54956.8

4. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
OPEN SESSION - 5:30 P.M.

5. INVOCATION

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

7. CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez, Councilmember Cordero, Councilmember Escobedo, Councilmember Soto, and Mayor Patino

8. REPORT BY THE CITY ATTORNEY FROM CLOSED SESSION

Page 2 of 147 ends

9. PROCLAMATIONS

9.a Proclamation - “Water Awareness Month” - May 2024
The City Council will consider declaring the month of May 2024 as “Water Awareness Month” in the City of Santa Maria.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

9.a.1 Presentation - Water Awareness Poster Contest Winners The City Council will receive a presentation of the 2024 water awareness poster contest winners.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

9.b Proclamation – “Fentanyl Awareness Day” – May 9, 2024 Present a Proclamation recognizing May 9th, 2024, as “Fentanyl Awareness Day” in the City of Santa Maria to raise awareness and prevent overdose caused by fentanyl.

9.c Proclamation – “Compost Awareness Week” – May 5 through 11, 2024 Present a Proclamation recognizing May 5th through 11th, 2024, as Compost Awareness Week in the City of Santa Maria.

9.d Proclamation - “National Police Week” - May 12 through May 18, 2024, and “Peace Officers’ Memorial Day” – May 15, 2024.

Present a Proclamation recognizing the week of May 12th through May 18th, 2024, as “National Police Week” and Wednesday, May 15th, 2024, be declared “Peace Officers’ Memorial Day” in the City of Santa Maria.

9.e Proclamation – “Go Rodeo Days” – May 7 through June 2 Present a Proclamation recognizing May 7th through June 2nd, 2024, as “Go Rodeo Days” in the City of Santa Maria.

9.f Proclamation – “National Bike Month” – May 2024
Present a Proclamation recognizing May 2024, as “National Bike Month” in the City of Santa Maria, and encourage people to join in celebrating bicycling.

10. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (Not to exceed 15 Minutes)
The City Council values your input. Instructions are provided above (page 1) for communicating with the City Council. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes or as directed by the Mayor.

11. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following routine items are presented for City Council approval without discussion as a single agenda item in order to expedite the meeting. The Consent Calendar is approved by roll call vote with one motion. These items are discussed only on request of Councilmembers. Members of the public may speak on Consent Calendar items during the Public Comment Period.

SHOULD A COUNCILMEMBER WISH TO DISCUSS OR DISAPPROVE ANY ITEM, it must be dropped from the blanket motion of approval and considered as a separate item.

Page 3 of 147 ends

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the Consent Calendar as submitted.

11.a CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT

11.a.1 Ordinances and Resolutions
RECOMMENDATION:

Waive the reading in full of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Ordinances on the Consent Agenda will be adopted by the same vote cast at the first meeting, unless City Council indicates otherwise.

11.a.2 Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the Minutes of the regular City Council meeting of April 16, 2024.

11.a.3 Adoption of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to Santa Barbara County Association of Governments Joint Powers Agreement
The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution approving an Amendment to Santa Barbara County Association of Governments Joint Powers Agreement.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution approving an amendment to the Joint Powers Authority Agreement for Santa Barbara County Association of Governments to add the role of coordination of broadband activities.

11.b COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

11.b.1 Employee Housing Resource Officer Annual Report
The City Council will receive, review, and file the Employee Housing Resource Officer annual report.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

11.c FINANCE DEPARTMENT

11.c.1 Payment of Warrants
RECOMMENDATION:

Order ratified subject to having been certified as being in conformity with the budget and having been approved for payment by the Director of Finance.

11.c.2 Payment of Payroll
RECOMMENDATION:

Order ratified subject to having been certified by the proper Department Directors, as shown on records on file in the Department of Finance, and having been approved for payment by the Director of Finance.

Page 4 of 147 ends

11.d PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

11.d.1 Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Establishment of Angle Parking on West Cypress Street
The City Council will consider approving the establishment of angle parking on West Cypress Street between South Depot Street and South Railroad Avenue.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution approving the establishment of angle parking on West Cypress Street.

11.d.2 Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Establishment of Limited-Time Parking Zone on Dal Porto Lane
The City Council will consider approving the establishment of limited-time parking on Dal Porto Lane.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing a limited-time parking zone on Dal Porto Lane.

11.d.3 Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Establishment of Limited-Time Parking Zone on Fairway Drive
The City Council will consider approving the establishment of a limited-time parking zone on Fairway Drive.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing a limited-time parking zone on Fairway Drive.

11.d.4 Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Establishment of Limited-Time Parking Zone on Thompson Way
The City Council will consider approving the establishment of a limited-time parking zone on Thompson Way.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

Page 5 of 147 ends

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing a limited-time parking zone on Thompson Way.

11.d.5 Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Establishment of Limited Time Parking Zone on South Thornburg Street
The City Council will consider approving establishing a limited-time parking zone on South Thornburg Street.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing a limited-time parking zone on South Thornburg Street.

11.d.6 Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Establishment of Preferential Parking Privileges in The Pacific Crest Estates Neighborhood
The City Council will consider approving the establishment of preferential parking privileges in the Pacific Crest Estates neighborhood.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution approving the establishment of preferential parking privileges to vehicles displaying a valid parking permit in the Pacific Crest Estates Neighborhood bounded by the southerly Right of Way of West Battles Road, easterly Right of Way of Biscayne Street, northerly Right of Way of Sonya Lane, westerly Right of Way of Pergola Street, and the existing pedestrian path.

12. REGULAR BUSINESS
ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS FOR REGULAR BUSINESS ITEMS:

Council Agenda Report to be given.

Questions from the City Council.

Written communications/Public input.

City Council discussion and action.

12.a The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution opposing Initiative No. 21- 0042A1, the “Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act”.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution opposing Ballot Initiative No 21-0042A1, the “Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act”.

Page 6 of 147 ends

12.b Conceptual Review of Proposed Downtown Redevelopment by the Vernon Group on City-Owned Parcels
The City Council will provide comments to address the applicant’s request and provide further direction to City staff regarding the proposed downtown redevelopment as part of a future sales and disposition agreement between Vernon Property Group, LLC and the City of Santa Maria.

12.c Review of the Financial Report for the Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024, and Adoption of Resolutions Approving Third Quarter Amendments to the 2023-24 Budget
The City Council will receive and file the 2023-24 Third Quarter Financial Report and consider the adoption of a Resolution approving amendments to the 2023-24 budget.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. Receive and file the Financial Report for the Third Quarter ending March 31, 2024; and
RECOMMENDATION:

2. Adopt a Resolution approving Third Quarter amendments to the 2023-24 Budget for personnel and operational changes.

13. REPORT BY INTERIM CITY MANAGER

14. ORAL REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS AND OFFICERS (INCLUDING AB1234

REPORTS)

15. ADJOURNMENT

PLEASE NOTE:

The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on May 21, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. The deadline for submitting items for the May 21st meeting is May 8th.

City Council Meetings are televised live on Comcast cable television channel 23 and are rebroadcast at 9:00 a.m. on the next Thursday and on the following Tuesday at 5:30 p.m.

Council Meeting videos are also available for viewing on the City’s website. Your attendance at this public meeting may result in the recording and broadcast of your image and/or voice.

If you challenge a determination made on a matter on this agenda in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described on this agenda, or in written correspondence to the city council at, or prior to, the public hearing.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION AND PROCESS:

This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2. By listing a topic on this agenda, the City Council has expressed its intent to discuss and act on

Page 7 of 147 ends

each item. In addition to any action identified in the summary description of each item, the action that may be taken by the City Council shall include: a referral to staff with specific requests for information; continuance; specific direction to staff concerning the policy or mission of the item; discontinuance of consideration; authorization to enter into negotiations and execute agreements pertaining to the item; adoption or approval; and disapproval. Items not on the agenda may not be discussed or acted upon except under emergency circumstances. (Government Code Section 54954.2).

Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the agenda are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and available for public inspection during City Hall business hours the Friday before the meeting. Any written correspondence or documents provided to a majority of the City Council after distribution of the Agenda will also be available for public inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. If requested, the agenda and supporting documents shall be made available in alternative formats to persons with a disability. The City Clerk’s Office will answer any questions regarding the agenda.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted after distribution of the agenda packet will also be available with the agenda material for public inspection during normal business hours in the City Clerk’s Office, 110 E. Cook Street, Santa Maria. Subject to the ability to post the documents prior to the meeting, such documents will also be available on the City’s meetings website portal for the current City Council meeting at https://cityofsantamaria.org/meetings.

The City of Santa Maria welcomes orderly participation at its meetings from all members of the public. Orderly participation means speaking only on items of City business or on subjects within the City’s control. Though the City Council wants to hear your concerns and values your input, it is inappropriate to defame, yell, use profane language, interrupt, or disrupt the meeting. All cellular telephones are to be turned off or set to vibrate, and signs are not to be displayed in a manner that violates the rights of others or prevents others from watching or fully participating in the Council meeting. Pursuant to Government Code Section 36813, the Mayor is authorized to prohibit such conduct, up to and including ordering anyone that disrupts the meeting to be removed from the City Council Chambers.

To receive reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act during the meeting, please notify the City Clerk’s office of your needs during business hours at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting (typically before 3 p.m. on the Thursday before the meeting). The Office of the City Clerk is located at 110 East Cook Street in Santa Maria; telephone (805) 925-0951, extension 2306. The City will give primary consideration to your request in providing assistance. Examples of assistance may include exhibits in large-sized format, use of assisted listening equipment, use of the California Relay Service, texting by cellular phone, or the services of a live interpreter.

Assisted listening equipment can also be used for interpretation by Spanish-only speaking persons. To allow the City to coordinate and request a Spanish interpreter from the volunteer corps, contact the Office of the City Clerk by 1:00 p.m. on Monday before the meeting.

Equipo también puede ser utilizado para la asistencia de interpretación para esas personas que solamente hablan español. Para permitirle a la Ciudad que coordine y solicite un interprete de un grupo de voluntarios, llame al (805) 925-0951 extensión 2307 a la 1:00 de la tarde el lunes antes de la junta.

Page 8 of 147 ends

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

BY: Director of Utilities Shad S. Springer

SUBJECT: Proclamation - “Water Awareness Month” - May 2024

Description:

The City Council will consider declaring the month of May 2024 as “Water Awareness Month” in the City of Santa Maria.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

BACKGROUND:

Each year, the Utilities Department, along with other water purveyors, observes the month of May as Water Awareness Month to educate the community and encourage the wise use of water.

DISCUSSION:

The Utilities Department maintains a robust water awareness and conservation program that includes community outreach, school education, complimentary home water visits, and suspected leak notifications. The objective of the City’s ongoing conservation campaign is to remind the community of the importance of conserving this natural resource.

Historically, water use increases in the month of May as summer approaches, especially for outdoor use. The community can help conserve over the summer by implementing the following tips outdoors:

Outdoor Conservation Tips
 Plant drought-tolerant or drought-resistant plants and trees.  Replace grass or turf with water-wise plants.
 Recycle indoor water to use on plants.
 Refrain from watering landscapes for 48 hours after rainfall.  Use a broom to clean driveways, patios, and sidewalks, instead of a hose.  Water outdoor landscapes in the early morning or late evening when temperatures are cooler (before 12:00 p.m. and after 4:00 p.m.).

On an ongoing basis, the following tips can also be implemented indoors:

2 Indoor Conservation Tips
 Install water-saving devices, such as low-flow showerheads, high-efficiency toilets, and kitchen and bathroom faucet aerators.
 Reduce showers by two minutes and save five gallons of water.  Turn water off while brushing teeth and save three gallons of water.  Fix leaky faucets and save up to 20 gallons of water per day.  Wash a full load of laundry (no partial loads) and save 15 to 50 gallons per load.

When funding is available, the State of California offers water rebates for turf replacements and toilet upgrades; that information is posted to the City website as it becomes available.

Fiscal Considerations
Costs for the conservation program are within the Utilities Department’s budget allocation for Fund 002 for the current fiscal year.

Impact to the Community
Reducing water use helps residents and businesses save money while preserving Earth’s natural resources.

City of Santa Maria
Santa Maria, California
Proclamation

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria maintains a robust water awareness and conservation program that includes community outreach, school education, complimentary home water visits, and suspected leak notifications to residential and commercial customers; and

WHEREAS, every industry, business, and resident can make a difference by conserving water at work, home, and school; and

WHEREAS, residents of all ages and businesses and industries of all types are invited and encouraged to implement just one of many tips and ideas to help conserve and save water in Santa Maria.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, ALICE M. PATINO, Mayor of the City of Santa Maria, hereby proclaim the month of May 2024 as

“WATER AWARENESS MONTH”

in the City of Santa Maria and urge everyone to do their part to conserve and preserve this precious resource.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and have caused the Seal of the City of Santa Maria to be affixed hereto this 7th day of May 2024.

______________________________________
Alice M. Patino, Mayor

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

BY: Director of Utilities Shad S. Springer

SUBJECT: Presentation of Water Awareness Poster Contest Winners

Description:

The City Council will receive a presentation of the 2024 water awareness poster contest winners.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

BACKGROUND:

The Utilities Department sponsors an annual water awareness poster contest for third- grade students in the Santa Maria -Bonita School District. Students compete by creating colorful posters symbolizing Water Awareness Month and the importance of water awareness and conservation.

DISCUSSION:

The Utilities Department will present the five winners of this year’s contest. Certificates and prizes will be awarded to students with winning posters in the following categories:
 Most Educational
 Most Colorful
 Most Original
 Most Water Aware
 Best Celebration of Water

Following the presentation, the winning posters will be displayed at City Hall, featured on the City’s website and social media, and highlighted in the Santa Maria Times and the Santa Maria Sun.

Fiscal Considerations
Costs associated with this annual contest are funded within the Utilities Department’s budget allocation for Fund 002 for the current fiscal year.

Impact to the Community
The Water Awareness Poster Contest is an extension of the classroom experience where students learn about conservation and the importance of using water wisely.

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

SUBJECT: Proclamation – “Fentanyl Awareness Day” – May 9, 2024

Present a Proclamation recognizing May 9 th, 2024, as “Fentanyl Awareness Day” in the City of Santa Maria to raise awareness and prevent overdose caused by fentanyl.

BACKGROUND:
“Fentanyl Awareness Day” is a day of education to raise public awareness that people are dying at alarming rates due to illicitly manufactured drugs mixed with fentanyl, a synthetic opioid, to increase potency, and pressed into pills made to look like legi timate pharmaceutical drugs.

DISCUSSION:

Fentanyl is odorless, tasteless, cheap, and extremely potent, 50 times more potent than heroin and 100 times more tenant than morphine. The number of opioid -related deaths involving fentanyl specifically increased from 12 in 2019 to 115 overdose deaths in 2022.

It is becoming more common for individuals to use drugs without knowing it contains fentanyl and overdose as a result.

Attachment: Proclamation

City of Santa Maria
Santa Maria, California
Proclamation

WHEREAS, “Fentanyl Awareness Day” is a day of education to raise public awareness that people are dying at alarming rates due to illicitly manufactured drugs mixed with fentanyl, a synthetic opioid, to increase potency, and pressed into pills made to look like legitimate pharmaceutical drugs; and

WHEREAS, the most common drugs involved in overdose deaths are fentanyl and other synthetic opioids, and over 150 people die every day from overdos es related to synthetic opioids like fentanyl; and

WHEREAS, fentanyl is odorless, tasteless, cheap, and extremely potent, 50 times more potent than heroin and 100 times more potent than morphine . The number of opioid -related deaths involving fentanyl spec ifically increased from 12 in 2019 to 115 overdose deaths in 2022; and

WHEREAS, it is becoming more common for individuals to use drugs without knowing it contains fentanyl and overdose as a result; and

WHEREAS, overdose deaths linked to synthetic opioids like fentanyl tripled nationally among teenagers in the last two years; and

WHEREAS, signed into law by Governor Newsom in October 2023, Assembly Bill 701 allows the penalties for fentanyl trafficking to mirror those of Schedule I drugs such as heroin and cocaine; and

WHEREAS, Fighting Back Santa Maria Valley Coalition will play an important role in highlighting the community-wide efforts to increase awareness and decrease the use of this highly addictive and dangerous drug; and

NOW, THEREFORE, I, ALICE M. PATINO, Mayor of the City of Santa Maria hereby proclaim May 9, 2024, as

“Fentanyl Awareness Day”

in the City of Santa Maria to raise awareness and prevent overdoses caused by fentanyl.

The City of Santa Maria, Fighting Back Santa Maria Valley Coalition, and many partners have come together to invite all residents to participate in Fentanyl Awareness Day.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and have caused the Seal of the City of Santa Maria to be affixed hereto this 7th day of May 2024.

______________________________
Alice M. Patino, Mayor

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

SUBJECT: Proclamation – “Compost Awareness Week” – May 5 through 11, 2024

Present a Proclamation recognizing May 5th through 11th, 2024, as Compost Awareness Week in the City of Santa Maria.

BACKGROUND:

The Compost Research & Education Foundation, along with Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and other countries have declared the first full week of May to be the annual International Compost Awareness Week.

DISCUSSION:

Organic materials suitable for composting represent a large percentage of materials that are landfilled and could be composted each year and composting is an effective form of waste reduction, reuse and r ecycling. Compost improves the soil structure, reduces erosion and run -off, supplies the soil with a variety of macro and micronutrients; and enables compost-amended soils to use less water.

The City of Santa Maria has initiated Greenwaste and Foodwaste collection programs to aid in the efforts of Environmental Sustainability. Engel & Gray Inc. Regional Composting Facility, Santa Maria, has been successfully composting organic material for sustainable agricultural practices since 1993, and the City has invested in collection programs to meet state requirements and save valuable landfill space.

Attachment: Proclamation

City of Santa Maria
Santa Maria, California
Proclamation

WHEREAS, the Compost Research & Education Foundation, along with Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and other countries have declared the first full week of May to be the annual International Compost Awareness Week;

WHEREAS, organic materials suitable for composting represent a large percentage of materials that are landfilled and could be composted each year and composting is an effective form of waste reduction, reuse and recycling. Compost improves the soil structure, reduces erosion and run-off, supplies the soil with a variety of macro and micronutrients; and enables compost-amended soils to use less water, and

WHEREAS, using sustainable soil-enriching composts helps prevent the erosion of valuable topsoil without depleting valuable wildlife habitats . Community Sustainability is enhanced by composting green waste, biosolids, and other organic materials and promoting the use of renewable resources in landscaping, horticulture, and agriculture; and

WHEREAS, returning composted organic resources to the soil is a method of decreasing the dependence on chemical fertilizers, decreasing erosion, reducing water consumption, and non point pollution; and

WHEREAS, The City of Santa Mar ia has initiated Greenwaste and Foodwaste collection programs to aid in the efforts of Environmental Sustainability . Engel & Gray Inc. Regional Composting Facility, Santa Maria, has been successfully composting organic material for sustainable agricultural practices since 1993, and the City has invested in collection programs to meet state requirements and save valuable landfill space; and

NOW, THEREFORE, I, ALICE M. PATINO , Mayor of the City of Santa Maria, hereby recognize the week of May 5th – 11th, 2024, as:

“COMPOST AWARENESS WEEK”

in the City of Santa Maria , as well as recognize the efforts of the Composting Councils, Extension Agents, householders, landscapers, farmers, recyclers, public workers, composters, gardeners, and plant growers everywhere, along with Engel & Gray Inc., and Harvest Blend Compost.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and have caused the Seal of the City of Santa Maria to be affixed hereto this 7th day of May 2024.

______________________________________
Alice M. Patino, Mayor

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

BY: Chief of Police Marc Schneider

SUBJECT: Proclamation - “National Police Week” - May 12 through May 18, 2024, and “Peace Officers’ Memorial Day” – May 15, 2024.

Present a Proclamation recognizing the week of May 12 th through May 18 th, 2024, as “National Police Week” and Wednesday, May 15 th, 2024, be declared “Peace Officers’ Memorial Day” in the City of Santa Maria.

BACKGROUND:

Every year, the week beginning on Mother’s Day is recognized as "National Police Week”.

This week is set aside in memory of the men and women in law enforcement agencies across the nation who lost their lives while performing their duties. Since 1995, the Santa Maria Police Officers’ Association has coordinated a memorial service and, in cooperation with the Santa Maria Police Department, has invited Northern Santa Barbara County law enforcement agencies, other public entities, and the general public to participate.

DISCUSSION:

In honor of our fallen officers, law enforcement agencies across the State of California will join agencies across the nation in setting aside a time to remember those officers and their contribution to the communities they served . Santa Maria will host a memorial service at the Santa Maria Police Department located at 1111 W est Betteravia Road, which will involve the Northern and Southern Santa Barbara County law enforcement agencies. The memorial service is open to other public agencies, as well as the general public.

The purpose of the memorial service has always been to educate the public as to the hazards faced by those sworn to protect them and to create an environment where the public can interact with their police departme nt. Although a formal environment exists, this is an alternative environment, different than what is created during an enforcement stop, or when a member of the public has been victimized. This type of ceremony has proven to generate civic pride and has provided a means for our officers to honor fallen kinsmen.

2 As part of the lead into National Police Week, a Proclamation has been prepared in recognition of May 12 th through May 18 th, 2024, as “National Police Week,” and proclaiming Wednesday, May 15th, 2024, as “Peace Officers’ Memorial Day” in the City of Santa Maria. Federal law requires the flag be flown at half -staff during this week in honor of law enforcement officers across the country who have died this past year in the performance of their duties.

Attachment: Proclamation

City of Santa Maria
Santa Maria, California
Proclamation

WHEREAS, of all the promises America offers, none is more precious or elusive than the right to be free from crime; and

WHEREAS, the dedicated men and women who have chosen law enforcement as a career face extraordinary risk and danger in preserving our freedom and security; and

WHEREAS, during the week of May 12 through May 18, 2024, “National Police Week” is observed to recognize the hazardous work, serious responsibility, and strong commitment of our Nation’s Peace Officers; and

WHEREAS, in conjunction with this important observance, the City of Santa Maria is observing May 15, 2024, as “Peace Officers’ Memorial Day ” in commemoration of those noble officers who have tragically sacrificed their lives in the line of duty; and

WHEREAS, four California Peace Officers are recognized as being killed in the line of duty during 2023; and

WHEREAS, these special observances provide all Santa Marians with the opportunity to appreciate the heroic men and women who have dedicated their lives to preserving public safety.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, ALICE M. PATINO, Mayor of the City of Santa Maria hereby recognize the week of May 12 through May 18, 2024, as:

“NATIONAL POLICE WEEK”

And proclaim Wednesday, May 15, 2024, as:

“PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL DAY”

in the City of Santa Maria , and encourage all residents to remember those individuals who gave their lives for our safety and express our appreciation to those who continue to dedicate themselves to making Santa Maria a safer place in which to live.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and have caused the Seal of the City of Santa Maria to be affixed hereto this 7th day of May 2024.

Mayor Alice M. Patino

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

SUBJECT: Proclamation – “Go Rodeo Days” – May 7 through June 2

Present a Proclamation recognizing May 7th through June 2nd, 2024, as “Go Rodeo Days” in the City of Santa Maria.

BACKGROUND:

Santa Maria will host the 81st annual Elks Rodeo and Parade, from May 30 through June 2, 2024. The first Santa Maria Elks Rodeo, held June 3 through 4, 1944, was referred to as the “Elks Recreational Foundation Benefit Wild West Show and Racing Meet.” The program included bronc riding, bareback riding, bulldogging, calf roping, steer stopping, and team roping, and had over 5,000 attendees.

DISCUSSION:

The first rodeo introduced a parade as part of the celebration. This year the parade will take place on Saturday, June 1 st, traversing down Broadway between Mill and Enos Streets. After the parade , a street fair will occur in the JCPenney parking lot, located at 1321 South Broadway. The City of Santa Maria will participate in Go Rodeo Days from May 7th through June 2nd, 2024.

The Rodeo will feature events including Team Roping, Bull Riding, Bronc Riding, Bareback Riding, Tie Down Roping, Steer Wrestling, and the WPRA Barrel Racing and Breakaway Roping. This year’s event will also include specialty acts, the Flying Cowboys, Junior Breakaway Roping, and Elks Team Roping.

Attachment: Proclamation

City of Santa Maria
Santa Maria, California
Proclamation

WHEREAS, the time is fast approaching for the 81st annual Elks Rodeo and Parade, May 30th through June 2nd, 2024, in the City of Santa Maria, considered by many to be the event of the year; and

WHEREAS, continuing the tradition of Clarence Minetti and Leland "Butch" Simas, hundreds of loyal Elks Lodge #1538 members have volunteered and have been drafted to make this rodeo a tremendous success and to cause Elks Lodge #1538 to be named "Number One" Elks Lodge in the United States numerous times over the last 35 years; and

WHEREAS, the Santa Maria Elks Rodeo Parade will begin at 10:00 a.m. on Saturday, June 1st, and continue down Broadway from Mill to Enos Streets; and

WHEREAS, it has been a long-standing tradition to begin wearing western clothes several weeks prior to the Elks Rodeo.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, ALICE M. PATINO, Mayor of the City of Santa Maria, hereby proclaim May 7th through June 2nd, 2024, as:

"GO RODEO DAYS"

in the City of Santa Maria and encourage all residents and businesses to enter the rodeo spirit by wearing western apparel.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and have caused the Seal of the City of Santa Maria to be affixed hereto this 7th day of May 2024.

____________________________________
Alice M. Patino, Mayor

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

SUBJECT: Proclamation – “National Bike Month” – May 2024

Present a Proclamatio n recognizing May 2024, as “National Bike Month” in the City of Santa Maria, and encourage people to join in celebrating bicycling.

BACKGROUND:

The bicycle is an economical, healthy, convenient, and environmentally sound form of transportation and an excellent tool for recreation and enjoyment of Santa Maria’s scenic beauty

DISCUSSION:

The City of Santa Maria facilitates and promotes bicycling through: our Public Works Department which creates and maintains bike lanes, paths, signs and signals, our utilities department which sweeps bicycle lanes clean, our GIS Department which facilitates reporting of needed maintenance, our Community Development Department which makes sure developments have adequate short and long -term bicycle parking, our Rec & Parks Department which maintains bicycle paths and trims City trees and bushes adjoining bicycle paths and lanes and facilitates bicycling events, our Code Enforcement Department which facilitates the trimming of trees and bushes on private property and the proper placement of garbage cans (not in bike lan es), our Police Department which enforces no parking in bicycle lanes and helps protect bicyclists from children to seniors as well as patrolling on bicycles themselves, our Public Library which lends books of how to repair and safely ride bicycles as well as books and movies of bicycle adventures, our schools which teach children to bicycle and the City Council which considers and passes budgets and ordinances to protect and regulate bicycling in our fair city.

Attachment: Proclamation

City of Santa Maria
Santa Maria, California
Proclamation

WHEREAS, the bicycle is an economical, healthy, convenient, and environmentally sound form of transportation and an excellent tool for recreation and enjoyment of Santa Maria’s scenic beauty; and

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria facilitates and promotes bicycling through: our Public Works Department which creates and maintains bike lanes, paths, signs and signals, our Utilities Department which sweeps bicycle lanes clean, our GIS Department wh ich facilitates reporting of needed maintenance, our Community Development Department which makes sure developments have adequate short and long -term bicycle parking, our Rec reation & Parks Department which maintains bicycle paths and trims City trees and bushes adjoining bicycle paths and lanes and facilitates bicycling events, our Code Enforcement Department which facilitates the trimming of trees and bushes on private property and the proper placement of garbage cans (not in bike lanes), our Police Depar tment which enforces no parking in bicycle lanes and helps protect bicyclists from children to seniors as well as patrolling on bicycles themselves, our Public Library which lends b ooks of how to repair and safely ride bicycles as well as books and movies of bicycle adventures, our schools which teach children to bicycle and the City Council which considers and passes budgets and ordinances to protect and regulate bicycling in our fair city; and

WHEREAS, creating a bicycling -friendly community has been sho wn to improve citizens’ health, well -being, and quality of life, grow the economy of Santa Maria, improve traffic safety, support student learning outcomes, and reduce pollution, collisions, congestion, and wear and tear on our streets and roads; and

WHEREAS, throughout May, the residents of Santa Maria and its visitors will experience the joys of bicycling through educational programs, commuting events, special bicycle rides, art, film and by simply getting out and going for a ride collectively known as CycleMAYnia; and

WHEREAS, CalBike, MOVE Santa Barbara County, the League of American Bicyclists, schools, our recreation and park department, Santa Maria Valley Chamber, companies , and civic groups will be promoting bicycling during May.

NOW, THEREFORE, I , ALICE M. PATINO, Mayor of the City of Santa Maria hereby proclaim the month of May 2024, as:

“NATIONAL BIKE MONTH”

in the City of Santa Maria, and urge all residents to join me in celebrating bicycling.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and have caused the Seal of the City of Santa Maria to be affixed hereto this 7th day of May 2024.

______________________________
Alice M. Patino, Mayor

1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

April 16, 2024, 5:30 p.m.

City Hall Council Chambers
110 East Cook Street
Santa Maria

Roll Call: Mayor Alice Patino, Councilmember Maribel Aguilera-Hernandez, Councilmember Mike Cordero (remotely), Councilmember Carlos Escobedo, Councilmember Gloria Soto

Staff Present: Interim City Manager Alex Posada, Assistant City Manager Chuen Wu, City Attorney Thomas Watson, Interim Chief Human Resources Officer Dawn Jackson, Director of Public Works Brett Fulgoni, Interim Director of Community Development Dana Eady, Chief Information Officer Jeffrey Marecic, Interim Director of Recreation and Parks Angela Oslund, Chief of Police Marc Schneider, Director of Utilities Shad Springer, Assistant City Clerk Alexandra Valadez, Deputy City Clerk Ashley Arciniega

_____________________________________________________________________

1. REMOTE PARTICIPATION UNDER ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 2449
Moved by: Mayor Patino
Seconded by: Councilmember Soto
The City Council considered a request from Councilmember Cordero to participate in the meeting (open and closed sessions) remotely via "emergency circumstances" due to a physical or family medical emergency that prevents him from attending in-person per Assembly Bill No. 2449.

The City Council also considered a request from Councilmember Aguilera -Hernandez to participate in the meeting (closed session) remotely via "Jus t Cause" due to a childcare need that prevents her from attending in-person per Assembly Bill No. 2449
For (2): Mayor Patino, and Councilmember Soto
Abstain (2): Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez, and Councilmember Cordero Absent (1): Councilmember Escobedo
Motion carried by a recorded vote (2 to 0)

CLOSED SESSION

2. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Patino called the meeting to order at 4:06 p.m.

ROLL CALL:

MEMBERS PRESENT:

Councilmembers Mike Cordero (remotely), Gloria Soto, and Mayor Alice Patino.

Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez did not activate her video during the Zoom session; however, she was physically present prior to the commencement of the Closed Session at 4:25 p.m.

Councilmember Escobedo joined the meeting during the public comment period at 4:19 p.m.

STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:

2 Interim City Manager Posada, City Attorney Watson, Assistant City Manager Wu, Director of Public Works Fulgoni, Director of Utilities Springer, and Assistant City Clerk Valadez (for roll call only).

3. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
Mayor Patino invited public comment. Speaking from the public was Jeremy Goldberg, Matt Luis, Andrew Kline, Matt Chircop, James Rainville, Charlie Martinez, and Jill Pontes.

4. RECESS-CLOSED SESSION

4.a Real Property Negotiators, Pursuant to California Government Code §54956.8

4.b Conference with Labor Negotiators, Pursuant to California Government Code §54957.6

4.c Public Employee Recruitment - City Manager, Pursuant to California Government Code §54956.8 Mayor Patino recessed to a Closed Session at 4:26 p.m.

5. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

OPEN SESSION

6. INVOCATION
Pastor Gonzalez with Central City Church gave the Invocation.

7. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez led the Pledge of Allegiance.

8. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Patino convened the meeting and called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.

9. REPORT BY THE CITY ATTORNEY FROM CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Watson reported that instructions were provided to the City's Labor Negotiator.

Instructions provided and direction given for items 4.a, 4.b, and 4.c.

10. PROCLAMATIONS

10.a Proclamation – “National Day of Prayer” – May 2, 2024 The City Council presented a Proclamation recognizing May 2 nd, 2024, as “National Day of Prayer” in the City of Santa Maria, and encouraged people of all faiths to participate in the “Day of Prayer” according to their own traditions. The Proclamation was accepted by Victoria Leach representing Santa Maria Valley Community of Prayer.

10.b Proclamation – “Public Service Recognition Week” - April 5 through May 11, 2024 The City Council presented a Proclamation recognizing the week of May 5 through May 11, 2024, as “Public Service Recognition Week” in the City of Santa Maria to honor public servants for the services they provide to residents in San ta Maria. The Proclamation was accepted by the Human Resources Division.

10.c Proclamation - “National Autism Awareness Month” - April 2024 The City Council presented a Proclamation recognizing the month of April 2024, as “National Autism Awareness Month” in the City of Santa Maria. The Proclamation was accepted by Edgar Gascon.

10.d Businesses of the Quarter – April to June 2024
The City Council presented certificates to the featured Businesses of the Quarter (April to June 2024) – Arrow Plumbing Drain & R epair Service and Trojan Petroleum, Inc. Accepting the certificate on behalf of Arrow Plumbing Drain & Repair Service was Kaniela and Jessica Keuma. Accepting the certificate on behalf of Trojan Petroleum, Inc. was Kathleen Brodie and Larry Schubert.

11. PRESENTATIONS

11.a Transit System Update

3 The City Council received a presentation regarding an update on Santa Maria Regional Transit system, growth, opportunities, and outlook. Staff report given by Transit Services Manager Gamaliel Anguiano.

12. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (Not to exceed 15 Minutes)
Mayor Patino invited public comment. Speaking from the public was Christian Soto, Benjamin Ortiz, Gary Hall, Colleen Murr, Cheryl Ausan, and Mona Schaefer for Elena Deparini.

13. CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar It ems 13.a.1 through 13.d.3 were approved as presented, including the adoption of Resolution Nos. 2024-52, 2024-53, and 2024-54. The recorded vote appears with each item below.

Mayor Patino pulled item 13.d.1 for comment. Speaking from the public on this item was Marjie Kirn and Geoff Straw.

Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Adopt the Consent Calendar as submitted.

For (5): Mayor Patino, Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez, Councilmember Cordero, Councilmember Escobedo, and Councilmember Soto
Motion carried by a recorded vote (5 to 0)

13.a CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT

13.a.1 Ordinances and Resolutions
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Waived the reading in full of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Ordinances on the Consent Agenda will be adopted by the same vote cast at the first meeting, unless City Council indicates otherwise.

Motion carried by a recorded vote

13.a.2 Approval of Minutes
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Approved the Minutes of the regular City Council meeting of April 2, 2024, and the Special City Council Meeting of April 6, 2024.

Motion carried by a recorded vote

13.b CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT

13.b.1 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2024-05 Technical Amendments – April 2024 Action: Adopted as Ordinance No. 2024-05.

Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Conducted the second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 2024 -05, amending various sections of the Santa Maria Municipal Code relating to general requirements of business taxes, licenses, and regulations, application for pub lic services, water service, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, refuse collection and recycling, cross connections, stormwater runoff pollution prevention, boards, commissions and committees, park rules, residential development tax, subdivision improvements, and personnel.

4 Motion carried by a recorded vote

13.c FINANCE DEPARTMENT

13.c.1 Payment of Warrants
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Order ratified subject to having been certified as being in conformity with the budget and having been approved for payment by the Director of Finance.

Motion carried by a recorded vote

13.c.2 Payment of Payroll
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Order ratified subject to having been certified by the proper Department Directors, as shown on records on file in the Department of Finance, and having been approved for payment by the Director of Finance.

Motion carried by a recorded vote

13.d PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

13.d.1 Federal Transit Administration 5307 Program of Projects for the Federal Fiscal Year 2024-2027 Federal Transportation Improvement Program
Action: Adopted as Resolution No. 2024-52.

Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Adopted a Resolution approving applications for Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 funds for Fiscal Year 2024 -25, Fiscal Year 2025 -2026, and Fiscal Year 2026 -27 for Santa Maria Urbanized Area.

Motion carried by a recorded vote

13.d.2 Santa Maria Regional Transit Fiscal Year 2023-24 Low Carbon Operations Program Grant Application, Solar Array Electric Vehicle Charger
Action: Adopted as Resolution No. 2024-53.

Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Adopted a Resolution authorizing the execution of the Certifications and Assurances and authorized agent forms for the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program, approve the grant application and receipt of Fis cal Year 2023 -24 Low Carbon Operations Program grant funding for $213,970 for the purchase of two Solar Array Electric Vehicle Chargers, designate representatives to act on City Council’s behalf, and amend the Transit Program’s Capital Maintenance Equipment Project Budget to reflect this project.

Motion carried by a recorded vote

13.d.3 Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Disposition of Older Transit Vehicles Action: Adopted as Resolution No. 2024-54.

Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez

5 Adopted a Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to sign sales agreements with a reputable auction company to surplus transit vehicles that have met the end of their Federal Transit Administration-defined useful life.

Motion carried by a recorded vote

14. APPOINTMENTS

14.a Measure U Citizens’ Oversight Committee and Recreation & Parks Commission Appointments Moved by: Mayor Patino
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Measure U Citizens' Oversight Committee
Councilmembers Aguilera -Hernandez and Soto considered appointments for a term of four years ending in January 2027. Councilmember Escobedo also has one nomination for the unexpired term ending in July 2025.

One application received from John Childers, Jr.

Councilmember Escobedo was absent from the room during the appointments and voting process.

Councilmembers Aguilera-Hernandez and Soto did not make appointments.

Recreation & Parks Commission
Councilmember Soto consi dered an appointment for a term of four years and/or coterminous with Councilmember Soto's term.

Four applications were received from Isaac Berumen, Anais Diaz, Benjamin Ortiz, and Jose Ramirez.

Councilmember Soto appointed Anais Diaz to serve a term of fo ur years and/or coterminous with Councilmember Soto's term.

For (4): Mayor Patino, Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez, Councilmember Cordero, and Councilmember Soto
Absent (1): Councilmember Escobedo
Motion carried by a recorded vote (4 to 0)

15. REGULAR BUSINESS

15.a Measure U Annual Report for the Period Ending June 30, 2023, as Submitted by the Measure U Citizens’ Oversight Committee
The City Council received a presentation from City staff and Vice -Chair of the Measure U Citizens’ Oversight Committee on the Measure U Annual Report for the period ending June 30, 2023; and received and filed the Measure U Citizens’ Oversight Committee 2022 -23 Annual Report. Assistant City Manager Wu gave the staff report, along with Measure U Citizens' Oversight Committee Vice Chair Owen.

Mayor Patino invited public comment. Speaking from the public was Matt Chircop.

16. REPORT BY INTERIM CITY MANAGER
Interim City Manager Posada shared the appointments of Cheun Wu as the official Assistant City Manager and Dana Eady as Interim Community Director.

Interim City Manager Posada reported that the next City Council Meeting would be May 7th. Items on the agenda would include closed -session meetings on Labor and City Manager Recruitment, a Proclamation for Water Awareness Month along with a presentation fo r the Poster Contest Winners, Proclamations for Go Rodeo Days, and Peace Officers' Memorial, Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act, 3rd Quarter Financial Report. Items on the agenda for the City Council Meeting on May 21st would include closed-session meetings on Labor and City Manager Recruitment (Tentative), a

6 Proclamation for Public Works Week, presentations by Santa Maria Community Television and Pavement Management, Engineer's Report, Encampment response and homeless services update.

17. ORAL REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS AND OFFICERS (INCLUDING AB1234 REPORTS) Councilmember Cordero had no report.

Councilmember Escobedo reported that he attended the American Riviera Spring Mixer, Closed Session Meeting, Elks Rodeo Queens Kick-Off, and Breakfast with the President at Marian Hospital.

Councilmember Aguilera -Hernandez reported that she attended the Close Session Meeting, Kite Festival, Elks Rodeo Queen Kick Off, and the Women Lawyers Association Meeting.

Councilmember Soto reported that she att ended the Closed Session Meeting and the Ben Heighes Show.

Mayor Patino reported that she attended the Ben Heighes Show, American Riviera Spring Mixer, LAFCO Meeting, First Friday At My Place, City Manager Recruitment Interviews, Elks Rodeo Queen Kick Off, Cal Cities Mayors and Councilmembers Department Roundtable, Marian Psychiatric Outpatient Tour, 63rd Annual California Square Dance Convention, Santa Maria Valley Senior Citizens Club Event, and California Alliance of Local Electeds.

18. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Patino encouraged the community to attend the Serve Santa Maria Meeting on April 20th at 8:00 a.m. at the Abel Maldonado Center.

Mayor Patino announced the adjournment of the City Council meeting to continue the Closed Session at 7:24 p.m. Subsequently, following the conclusion of the Closed Session, Mayor Patino adjourned the meeting at 8:26 p.m.

_________________________
Chief Deputy City Clerk

_________________________
Alice M. Patino, Mayor

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to Santa Barbara County Association of Governments Joint Powers Agreement

Description:

The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution approving an Amendment to Santa Barbara County Association of Governments Joint Powers Agreement.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution approving an amendment to the Joint Powers Authority Agreement for Santa Barbara County Association of Governments to add the role of coordination of broadband activities.

BACKGROUND:

During 2020, at the outset of the COVID -19 pandemic and increased stay-at-home activities, access to affordable , reliable, high -speed internet was exposed as needing much improvement. As such, legislative actions occurred at both the State and Federal levels. In June 2020, California Senate Bill 1462 was approved establishing the California Broadband Council to pr omote broadband deployment in unserved and underserved areas as defined by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). In August 2020, Governor Newsom signed Executive Order N -73-20 which required the development of a Broadband Action Plan for Calif ornia. Furthermore, in July 2021 California Senate Bill 156 authorized Joint Powers Authorities (JPAs) to issue revenue bonds for broadband infrastructure implementation under the Broadband Loan Loss Reserve Fund.

Building upon this momentum at a local level, in October 2021 the Broadband Alliance (Alliance) for Santa Barbara County was formed. The Alliance was comprised of membership for all member agencies of Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG), additionally including the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians, the Broadband Consortium of the Pacific Coast , and regional economic development organizations. Contributions were made from American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding to develop a countywide Broadband Strategic Plan (BSP). Work on the BSP began in late 2021 and in December 2022, the SBCAG Board approved the BSP as a framework plan for which to initiate broadband implementation in the County. Prior to the adoption of the BSP, SBCAG received approvals from member agencies.

2 DISCUSSION:

The BSP included several recommendations, one of which was forming a Joint Power Authority (JPA) by member agencies for administering regional broadband to improve the broadband.s. To further explore options for development of the regional broadband, SBCAG and the County of Santa Barbara received grant funding from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) under the Local Agency Technical Assistance (LATA) program. Under the grant, SBCAG initiated work o n JPA options with an initial presentation to its board in October 2023. The SBCAG board approved an option that would have its counsel amend SBCAG’s JPA agreement to include broadband activities.

Members of SBCAG supported this as the simplest approach, not requiring the development of a new JPA, and maintaining local control for broadband implementation and permitting. Following the approval of the JPA amendment language by the SBCAG board, SBCAG counsel was directed to commence seeking input from the me mber agencies. That process has been completed and now the final language is ready for approval by each of the member agencies.

Alternative(s)
The City Council could choose not to adopt the Resolution approving the amendment. If the City Council decides n ot to adopt the Resolution, SBCAG will not be able to move forward with the addition of coordination of broadband activities.

Fiscal Considerations
There is no immediate or direct fiscal impact on the City.

Impact to the Community
The amendment is a positive impact on the community as it is the simplest , most beneficial approach to coordinating broadband activities within the community. It will include bringing in broadband to unserved and underserved residents in our community.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Second Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement for SBCAG Attachment B: Redlined – Second Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement for SBCAG

Page 1 of 11 ends

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT

FOR THE

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS

THIS SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made by and among the incorporated cities of Buellton, Carpinteria, Goleta, Guadalupe, Lompoc, Santa Barbara, Santa Maria, and Solvang, all being municipal corporations of the State of California within the County of Santa Barbara; and, the County of Santa Barbara, a body politic and corporate and subdivision of the State of California, as follows:

WHEREAS, Sections 6500 et seq . of the California Government Code (Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 5, Article 1), provides for agreements between two or more public agencies to jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties; and

WHEREAS, in 1966, the County of Santa Barbara, and the Cities of Santa Barbara, Santa Maria, Lompoc, Carpinteria, and Guadalupe e stablished the Santa Barbara County and Cities Area Planning Council through an initial Joint Powers Agreement; and

WHEREAS, beginning in 1990, the member agencies of the Santa Barbara County and Cities Area Planning Council executed an amendment to the initial Joint Powers Agreement to rebrand the agency as the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments which is considered the first amendment to the initial Joint Powers Agreement; and

WHEREAS, through the following resolutions each governing body entered into the first amended Joint Powers Agreement approved in 1990 and replaced by this Second Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement:

1. By the City of Buellton, Council Resolution R92-44, on February 27, 1992;

Page 2 of 11 ends

2. By the City of Carpinteria, Council Resolution 1937, on July 23, 1990;

3. By the City of Goleta, Council Resolution 02-32, on February 1, 2002;

4. By the City of Guadalupe, Council Resolution 90-933, on August 27, 1990;

5. By the City of Lompoc, Council Resolution 3994(90), on September 18, 1990;

6. By the City of Santa Barbara, Council Resolution 90-163, on October 2, 1990;

7. By the City of Santa Maria, Council Resolution 90-104, on August 7, 1990;

8. By the City of Solvang, Council Resolution 90-173, on August 13, 1990; and

9. By the County of Santa Barbara, Board Resolution 90-744, on July 24, 1990.

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Barbara by virtue of its charter, and the other incorporated cities and the county, parties hereto have the joint and mutual powers, to address regional planning and program concerns, pursuant to various sections of the California Government Code; to designate an appropriate body to assume the planning responsibilities of an airport land use commission pursuant to Section 21670.1 of the California Public Utilities Code; to participate in regional planning within the meaning of title 42 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) section 3334; to designate a representative organization as the metropolitan planning organization pursuant to title 23 of the U.S.C. section 134(b); and to designate an appropriate body to assume the responsibilities for facilitating regional broadband internet access service or related telecommunications services consistent with, but not limited to, California Senate Bill 156 (2021) (excluding broadband and telecommunication permitting to which each incorporated city and the county shall retain its jurisdictional responsibility); and

WHEREAS, prior to 1990, a joint powers agency known as the Santa Barbara County and Cities Area Planning Council had been designated as the Local Transportation Authority for Santa Barbara County pursuant to California Public Utilities Code section 180000 et seq.,
and as the transportation planning agency pursuant to California Government Code section 29532; and

WHEREAS, prior to 1990, the parties hereto recognized that the County of Santa Barbara with its included incorporated cities had been designated by the Bureau of the Census as

Page 3 of 11 ends

a standard metropolitan area, and was changing from a rural to an urban area with continuing expansion of it s incorporated cities and development of the formerly undeveloped areas; and

WHEREAS, all parties to said joint powers agency wish to reapprove, ratify, and include all of said functions, powers and designations in said agency and approve and give effect to the resolution adopted by said joint powers agency for it to continue to be known hereafter as the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:

1. The Santa Barbara County and Cities Area Planning Council that existed prior to 1990 consisting of the five members of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara from time to time in office and of one additional member from each incorporated city within the boundaries of the County of Santa Barbara w hich is a party to this agreement, shall continue to be known and designated hereafter as the Santa Barbara County Association o f Governments and is ratified, confirmed and
continued to exercise the powers and fulfill the responsibilities referred to above and by any and all past action, assignment, designation and commitment as has heretofore been conferred upon said Santa Barbara County and Cities Area Planning Council in all aspects of its function and under all designations that it has been subject to. Duly elected members of the State Legislature representing Santa Barbara County shall continue ex officio status with said agency. The representatives from each city may be the mayor or any member of the City Council and shall serve so long as he or she shall hold office or until resignation or removal by majority vote of the City Council represented. Vacancies among representatives from the incorporated cities shall be filled in the same manner as the first appointment.

County Supervisors shall serve so long as he or she shall hold office.

2. The Santa Barbara County Association of Governments shall serve as a transportation planning agency pursuant to Section 29532 of the Government Code;

Page 4 of 11 ends

as the Transportation authority pursuant to California Public Utilities Code section 180000 et seq.; as the metropolitan planning organization responsible for carrying out the provisions of title 23 of the U.S.C. section 134; as the airport land use commission pursuant to Section 21670.1 of the Publ ic Utilities Code ; as a metropolitan clearinghouse pursuant to Section 204 of Public Law 89-754 (42 U.S.C. § 3334); and, as the local agency responsible for facilitating regional broadband internet access service or related telecommunications services consistent with, but not limited to, California Senate Bill 156 (2021) (excluding broadband and telecommunication permitting to which each incorporated city and the county s hall retain its jurisdictional responsibility) . The Santa Barbara County Association of Governments may by resolution consent to serve as lead planning organization for air quality pursuant to Section 174 of Public Law 95-95 (42 U.S.C. § 7504) in the event the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County relinquishes its designation as lead planning organization.

3. In addition to the incorporated cities mentioned in this Agreement, any other city which may hereafter be incorporated within the boundaries of the County of Santa Barbara and which may desire to participate in the activities of this Santa Barbara County Association of Governments may do so by executing this Agreement without prior approval or ratification of the named parties to this Agreement an d shall thereafter be bound by all of the terms and provisions of this Agreement as of the date of execution.

4. The time, place and dates of regular meetings, the method of calling special meetings, the election of such officers and the employment of such personnel as are deemed necessary and appropriate, arrangements for financing, and rules of procedures all be as provided in Bylaws adopted by the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments, or in the absence of Bylaws by majority vote of the governing board of said agency. In any event, regular meetings shall be held not less often than quarterly.

Page 5 of 11 ends

5. Officers and employees, including an Executive Director shall be employed by the· Council, as provided in the Ordinances adopted by said Transportation Authority.

6. The Santa Barbara County Treasurer shall be the depositary and have custody of all the money of the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments.

7. The undersigned parties to this Agreement pledge full cooperation and agree to assign representati ves to serve as official members of this organization or any committee or subcommittee.

8. This Agreement shall take effect upon its execution by the Chairmen and Clerks of the legislative bodies of all of the parties authorized pursuant to resolutions of such legislative bodies authorizing such execution as indicated below.

9. The Santa Barbara County Association of Governments shall have the powers provided by the acts, ordinances and designations referred to above, and such powers as are necessary to enable it to fulfill and carry out its functions as described herein, including, but not by way of limitation, the following powers:

a. to make and enter into contracts;
b. to apply for and accept grants, advances, and contributions from any source including member Jurisdictions;
c. to employ or contract for the services of agents, employees, consultants and such other persons or firms as it deems necessary;
d. to make plans and conduct studies;
e. to sue and be sued in its own name;
f. to incur debts, liabilities, or obligations, subject to the limitations herein set forth; and
g. to adopt annually a budget setting forth all administrative, operational and capital expenses.

Page 6 of 11 ends

10. Nothing herein shall be construed as limiting in any manner the power of any of the respective parties to initiate and complete a local project within their respective jurisdictions with their own funds. It is understood, however, that the recommendations of the agency may have the effe ct of precluding any favorable action by an agency of the state or federal governments in support of such a project if other than local financing is sought, as determined by the respective state or federal agency under laws, regulations and policies applicable to them.

11. This Agreement shall be effective for a period of five years but shall be deemed automatically renewed by each party hereto for additional five -year periods unless a notice of non-renewal adopted by resolution of the governing body of such a party is given to the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments.

12. If any one or more of the provisions contained herein shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, then such provision or provisions shall be deemed severable from the remaining provisions hereof, and such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof, and this Agreement shall b e construed as if such invalid, illegal , or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein.

13. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original; and all su ch counterparts, or as many of them as the parties shall preserve undestroyed, shall together constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement to be effective on the date when fully executed by all parties.

[Signatures on following pages.]

Page 7 of 11 ends

CITY OF BUELLTON

Dave King Date:

Mayor

ATTEST:

Scott Wolfe
City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Greg Murphy
City Attorney

CITY OF CARPINTERIA

Al Clark Date:

Mayor

ATTEST:

Michael Ramirez
City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Jena Shoaf Acos
City Attorney

Page 8 of 11 ends

CITY OF GOLETA

Paula Perotte Date:

Mayor

ATTEST:

Robert Nisbet
City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Megan Garibaldi
City Attorney

CITY OF GUADALUPE

Ariston Julian Date:

Mayor

ATTEST:

Todd Bodem
City Administrator

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Philip F. Sinco
City Attorney

Page 9 of 11 ends

CITY OF LOMPOC

Jenelle Osborne Date:

Mayor

ATTEST:

Dean Albro
City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Jeff Malawy
City Attorney

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

Paul Casey Date:

City Administrator

ATTEST:

Sarah Gorman
City Clerk Services Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Ariel P. Calonne
City Attorney

Daniel S. Hentschke,
Assistant City Attorney

Page 10 of 11 ends

CITY OF SANTA MARIA

Alice Patino Date:

Mayor

ATTEST:

Sarah Gorman
City Administrator

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Thomas T. Watson
City Attorney

Jeffrey Patrick
Assistant City Attorney

CITY OF SOLVANG

Mark Infanti Date:

Mayor

ATTEST:

Randy Murphy
City Manager

���������������������
������������������
�������������

Page 11 of 11 ends

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA

Steve Lavagnino Date:

Chair, Board of Supervisors

ATTEST:

Mona Miyasato
County Executive Officer
Clerk of the Board

Deputy Clerk

APPROVED AS TO ACCOUNTING FORM:

Betsy M. Schaffer, CPA
Auditor-Controller

Deputy

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Rachel Van Mullem
County Counsel

Deputy County Counsel

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Greg Milligan
Risk Manager

Page 1 of 12 ends

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT

FOR THE

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
THIS SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made by and among the incorporated cities of Buellton, Carpinteria, Goleta, Guadalupe, Lompoc, Santa Barbara, Santa Maria, Lompoc, Carpinteria, Guadalupe, and Solvang, all being municipal corporations of the State of California within the County of Santa Barbara;, and, the County of Santa Barbara, a body politic and corporate and subdivision of the State of California, as follows:

WHEREAS, Sections 6500 et seq. of the California Government Code (Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 5, Article 1), provides for agreements between two or more public agencies to jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties; and WHEREAS, in 1966, the County of Santa Barbara, and the Cities of Santa Barbara, Santa Maria, Lompoc, Carpinteria, and Guadalupe established the Santa Barbara County and Cities Area Planning Council through an initial Joint Powers Agreement; and WHEREAS, beginning in 1990, the member agencies of the Santa Barbara County and Cities Area Planning Council executed an amendment to the initial Joint Powers Agreement to rebrand the agency as the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments which is considered the first amendment to the initial Joint Powers Agreement; and WHEREAS, through the following resolutions each governing body entered into the first amended Joint Powers Agreement approved in 1990 and replaced by this Second Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement:

Page 2 of 12 ends

1. By the City of Buellton, Council Resolution R92-44, on February 27, 1992;

2. By the City of Carpinteria, Council Resolution 1937, on July 23, 1990;

3. By the City of Goleta, Council Resolution 02-32, on February 1, 2002;

4. By the City of Guadalupe, Council Resolution 90-933, on August 27, 1990;

5. By the City of Lompoc, Council Resolution 3994(90), on September 18, 1990;

6. By the City of Santa Barbara, Council Resolution 90-163, on October 2, 1990;

7. By the City of Santa Maria, Council Resolution 90-104, on August 7, 1990;

8. By the City of Solvang, Council Resolution 90-173, on August 13, 1990; and

9. By the County of Santa Barbara, Board Resolution 90-744, on July 24, 1990.

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Barbara by virtue of its charter, and the other incorporated cities and the county, parties hereto have the joint and mutual powers, to address area regional planning and program concerns, pursuant to various sections of the California Government Code; to designate an appropriate body to assume the planning responsibilities of an airport land use commission pursuant to Section 21670.1 of the California Government Public Utilities Code; to participate in regional planning within the meaning of title 42 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) section U.S.C. § 3334; and to designate a representative organization as the metropolitan planning organization pursuant to title 23 of the U.S.C. §section 134(b); and to designate an appropriate body to assume the responsibilities for facilitating regional broadband internet access service or related telecommunications services consistent with, but not limited to, California Senate Bill 156 (2021) (excluding broadband and telecommunication permitting to which each incorporated city and the county shall retain its jurisdictional responsibility); and

WHEREAS, prior to 1990, a joint powers agency known as the Santa Barbara County and Cities Area Planning Council has been exercising such powers for such purposes, and has had been designated as the Local Transportation Authority for Santa Barbara County pursuant to California Public Utilities Code section 180000 et seq., and as the transportation planning agency pursuant to California Government Code section 29532; and

Page 3 of 12 ends

WHEREAS, prior to 1990, the parties hereto recognized that the County of Santa Barbara with its included incorporated cities has had been designated by the Bureau of the Census as a standard metropolitan area, and iswas changing from a rural to an urban area with continuing expansion of its incorporated cities and development of the formerly undeveloped areas; and

WHEREAS, all parties to said joint powers agency wish to reapprove, ratify, and include all of said functions, powers and designations in said agency and approve and give effect to the resolution adopted by said joint powers agency for it to continue to be known hereafter as the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:

1. The Santa Barbara County and Cities Area Planning Council that existed prior to 1990 consisting of the five members of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara from time to time in office and of one additional member from each incorporated city within the boundaries of the County of Santa Barbara which is a party to this agreement, shall continue to be known and designated hereafter as the Santa Barbara County Association o f Governments and is ratified, confirmed and continued to exercise the powers and fulfill the responsibilities referred to above and by any and all past action, assignment, designation and commitment as has heretofore been conferred upon said Santa Barbara County and Cities Area Planning Council in all aspects of its function and under all designations that it has been subject to. Duly elected members of the State Legislature representing Santa Barbara County shall continue ex officio status with said agency. The representatives from each city may be the mayor or any member of the City Council and shall serve so long as he or she shall hold office or until resignation or removal by majority vote of the City Council represented. Vacancies among representatives from the incorporated cities shall be filled in the same manner as the first appointment. County Supervisors shall serve so long as he or she shall hold office.

Page 4 of 12 ends

2. The Santa Barbara County Association of Governments shall serve as a transportation planning agency pursuant to § Section 29532 of the Government Code;, as the Transportation authority pursuant to California Public Utilities Code section 180000 et Sseq.;, as the metropolitan planning organization responsible for carrying out the provisions of title 23 of the U.S.C. §section 134,; as the airport land use commission pursuant to § Section 21670.1 of the Public Utilities Code ,; and as a metropolitan clearinghouse pursuant to § Section 204 of Public Law 89-754 (42 U.S.C. § 3334); and, as the local agency responsible for facilitating regional broadband internet access service or related telecommunications services consistent with, but not limited to, California Senate Bill 156 (2021) (excluding broadband and telecommunication permitting to which each incorporated city and the county shall retain its jurisdictional responsibility) . The Santa Barbara County Association of Governments may by resolution consent to serve as lead planning organization for air quality pursuant to Section 174 of Public Law 95-95 (42 U.S.C. § 7504) in the event the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County relinquishes its designation as lead planning organization.

3. In addition to the incorporated cities mentioned in this Agreement, any other city which may hereafter be incorporated within the boundaries of the County of Santa Barbara and which may desire to participate in the activities of this Santa Barbara County Association of Governments may do so by executing this Agreement without prior approval or ratification of the named parties to this Agreement and shall thereafter be bound by all of the terms and provisions of this Agreement as of the date of execution.

4. The time, place and dates of regular meetings, the method of calling special meetings, the election of such officers and the employment of such personnel as are deemed necessary and appropriate, arrangements for financing, and rules of procedures all be as provided in Bylaws adopted by the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments, or in the absence of Bylaws by majority vote of the governing board of said agency. In any event, regular meetings shall be held not less

Page 5 of 12 ends

often than quarterly.

5. Officers and employees, including an Executive Director shall be employed by the· Council, as provided in the Ordinances adopted by said Transportation Authority.

6. The Santa Barbara County Treasurer shall be the depositary and have custody of all the money of the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments.

7. The undersigned parties to this Agreement pledge full cooperation and agree to assign representatives to serve as official members of this organization or any committee or subcommittee.

8. This Agreement shall take effect upon its execution by the Chairmen and Clerks of the legislative bodies of all of the parties authorized pursuant to resolutions of such legislative bodies authorizing such execution as indicated below.

9. The Santa Barbara County Association of Governments shall have the powers provided by the acts, ordinances and designations referred to above, and such powers as are necessary to enable it to fulfill and carry out its functions as described herein, including, but not by way of limitation, the following powers:

a. to make and enter into contracts;
b. to apply for and accept grants, advances, and contributions from any source including member Jurisdictions;
c. to employ or contract for the services of agents, employees, consultants and such other persons or firms as it deems necessary;
d. to make plans and conduct studies;
e. to sue and be sued in its own name;
f. to incur debts, liabilities, or obligations, subject to the limitations herein set forth; and
g. to adopt annually a budget setting forth all administrative, operational and

Page 6 of 12 ends

capital expenses.

10. Nothing herein shall be construed as limiting in any manner the power of any of the respective parties to initiate and complete a local project within their respective jurisdictions with their own funds. It is understood, however, that the recommendations of the agency may have the effect of precluding any favorable action by an agency of the state or federal governments in support of such a project if other than local financing is sought, as determined by the respective state or federal agency under laws, regulations and policies applicable to them.

11. This Agreement shall be effective for a period of five years but shall be deemed automatically renewed by each party hereto for additional five-year periods unless a notice of non-renewal adopted by resolution of the governing body of such a party is given to the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments.

12. If any one or more of the provisions contained herein shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, then such provision or provisions shall be deemed severable from the remaining provisions hereof, and such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein.

11.13. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original; and all such counterparts, or as many of them as the parties shall preserve undestroyed, shall together constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement to be effective on the date when fully executed by all parties.

Page 7 of 12 ends

[Signatures on following pages.]

Page 8 of 12 ends

CITY OF BUELLTON

Dave King Date:

Mayor

ATTEST:

Scott Wolfe
City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Greg Murphy
City Attorney

CITY OF CARPINTERIA

Al Clark Date:

Mayor

ATTEST:

Michael Ramirez
City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Jena Shoaf Acos
City Attorney

Page 9 of 12 ends

CITY OF GOLETA
Paula Perotte Date:

Mayor
ATTEST:

Robert Nisbet
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Megan Garibaldi
City Attorney

CITY OF GUADALUPE
Ariston Julian Date:

Mayor
ATTEST:

Todd Bodem
City Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Philip F. Sinco
City Attorney

Page 10 of 12 ends

CITY OF LOMPOC
Jenelle Osborne Date:

Mayor
ATTEST:

Dean Albro
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Jeff Malawy
City Attorney

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Paul Casey Date:

City Administrator
ATTEST:

Sarah Gorman
City Clerk Services Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Ariel P. Calonne
City Attorney
Daniel S. Hentschke,
Assistant City Attorney

Page 11 of 12 ends

CITY OF SANTA MARIA
Alice Patino Date:

Mayor
ATTEST:

Sarah Gorman
City Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Thomas T. Watson
City Attorney
Jeffrey Patrick
Assistant City Attorney

CITY OF SOLVANG
Mark Infanti Date:

Mayor
ATTEST:

Randy Murphy
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Chelsea O’Sullivan
City Attorney

Page 12 of 12 ends

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA
Steve Lavagnino Date:

Chair, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:

Mona Miyasato
County Executive Officer
Clerk of the Board
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED AS TO ACCOUNTING FORM:

Betsy M. Schaffer, CPA
Auditor-Controller
Deputy
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Rachel Van Mullem
County Counsel
Deputy County Counsel
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Greg Milligan
Risk Manager

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN

AMENDMENT TO SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ASSOCIATION

OF GOVERNMENTS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT

WHEREAS, California Senate Bill 1462 was approved establishing the California Broadband Council to promote broadband deployment in unserved and underserved areas as defined by the California Public Utilities Commission. In August 2020, Governor Newsom signed Executive Order N-73-20 which required the development of a Broadband Action Plan for California. Furthermore, in July 2021 , California Senate Bill 156 authorized Joint Powers Authorities to issue revenue bonds for broadband infrastructure implementation under the Broadband Loan Loss Reserve Fund; and

WHEREAS, The Broadband Alliance for Santa Barbara County was formed.

Contributions were made from American Rescue Plan Act funding to develop a countywide Broadband Strategic Plan (BSP). Work on the BSP began in late 2021 and in December 2022, the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) Board approved the BSP as a framework plan for which to initiate broadband implementation in the County. Prior to the adoption of the BSP, SBCAG received approvals from membe r agencies.; and

WHEREAS, The SBCAG board approved an option that would have its coun sel amend SBCAG’s Joint Powers Authority (JPA) agreement to include broadband activities.

Members of SBCAG supported this as the simplest approach, did not require the development of a new JPA , and maintained local control for broadband implementation and permitting. That process has now been completed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. The City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor, or designee, to execute the amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement for SBCAG; and

2. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make m inor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance to the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 7th day of May 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
Interim City Manager

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

BY: Interim Director of Community Development Dana Eady

SUBJECT: Employee Housing Resource Officer Annual Report

Description:

The City Council will receive, review, and file the Employee Housing Resource Officer annual report.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

BACKGROUND:

On July 15, 2021, the City of Santa Maria entered into a Voluntary Compliance Agreement (Agreement) with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. The Agreement is a result of an investigation of the City’s Employee Housing Ordinance completed by HUD in 2021. The Agreement required the City to repeal its Employee Housing Ordinance d ue to its potential to result in the restriction of housing for people from a specific country or national origin, defined as a Federally protected class. The Ordinance was repealed on July 20, 2021, and the Agreement between HUD and the City of Santa Mari a is in effect for five years. This annual report presents a summary of the performance/trends/lessons learned resulting from the implementation of the Agreement.

DISCUSSION:

The Agreement specifies timelines for the completion of requirements such as t he development of a Language Access Plan (LAP) and a work plan that implements the plan and includes the creation of a “complaint reporting system” for any alleged housing discrimination. A Fair Housing Training/Symposium is conducted annually, and the City has also established an Employee Housing working group to meet periodically to discuss Employee Housing and any challenges or items to review.

The City has continued implementation of the L AP and all staff are trained in its procedures. Employees have a ccess to the list of City employees certified to translate and interpret in the workplace and have access to translated documents, forms, and brochures for printing and distribution to those who need them . The City’s website provides a Google translate function to ensure that all notices, programs, and other City documents can be translated into any language. The work plan to implement the L AP 2 includes procedures for the E mployee Housing Resources Officer (EHRO) to follow if a complaint regarding Employee Housing is filed. This process has been provided on the City’s website along with the EHRO’s contact information. To date, the EHRO has not received any complaints regarding housing discrimination in the City or regarding the quality and/or safety of occupied Employee Housing Units.

To encourage coordination between the City and owners, operators, and residents of Employee Housing, the Agreement requires the EHRO to establish an Employee Housing working group, inviting the owners/operator s of Employee Housing, farm owners/operators, and advocates for H2A visa-holders to participate. The working group has been established and most recently met on April 17, 2024. Topics of discussion have included housing inventory, fiscal challenges, and th e overall needs of H2A workers.

Additional meetings with the working group will be conducted throughout 2024. The Agreement also requires the City to plan an annual Fair Housing Training/Symposium.

On April 14, 2023, training was provided by the Legal Aid Foundation on tenants’ rights.

The Legal Aid Foundation will be providing the next training in June 2024.

The EHRO will continue to facilitate the implementation of the requirements of the Agreement and provide the City Council with a report annually. This report is intended to provide the City Council with an update as to the status of compliance with the Agreement and any resulting performance/trends/lessons learned. At this time, the City is in compliance with the Agreement and has been coordinating wit h HUD to complete all requirements.

Fiscal Considerations
The implementation of the terms of the Agreement by the EHRO has some fiscal impact on the City with work hours covered by the Interim Director of Community Development, and other City staff and training consultants. There could be punitive fiscal impacts to the City if HUD were to find that there is a failure to carry out the terms of the Agreement resulting in a material breach. This may result in a suspension, termination, or refusal to grant or to continue Federal financial assistance to the City. This is a determination that would be made by HUD, and the city would have seven days to cure any breach following notice by HUD before any enforcement actions were initiated.

Impact to the Community
The continued implementation of the Agreement by the EHRO will have a positive impact to the Community. The implementation of the terms of the Agreement will continue the City of Santa Maria’s efforts to ensure meaningful access to City programs and activities by all Santa Maria residents.

ATTACHMENTS

A. Spanish - Report - Employee Housing Resource Officer 2024 B. Executed Voluntary Compliance Agreement

ATTACHMENT B
PARA LA REUNIÓN DEL CONSEJO DE 7 DE MAYO DE 2024

INFORME DE LA AGENDA DEL CONSEJO

PARA: El Consejo Municipal

DE: El Administrador Interino de la Ciudad, Alex Posada

POR: La Directora Interina de Desarrollo Comunitario, Dana Eady

SUJETO: Informe Anual del Oficial de Recursos de Vivienda para Empleados

Descripción:

El Concejo Municipal recibirá, revisará y archivará el informe anual del Oficial de Recursos de Vivienda para Empleados.

Aviso Ambiental: La actividad no es un "Proyecto" según se define en la Sección 15378 de las Pautas Estatales de la Ley de Calidad Ambiental de California ; por lo tanto, de conformidad con la Sección 15060 (c)(3) de las Pautas Estatales, no se requiere una revisión ambiental.

HISTORIAL:

El 15 de julio de 2021, la Ciudad de Santa María entró a un Acuerdo de Cumplimiento Voluntario (Acuerdo) con la Oficina de Vivienda Justa e Igualdad de Oportunidades del Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano de los Estados Unidos (HUD, por sus siglas en inglés). El Acuerdo es el resultado de una investigación de la Ordenanza de Vivienda para Empleados de la Ciudad completada por HUD en el 2021. El Acuerdo requería que la Ciudad revocara su Ordenanza de Vivienda para Empleados debido a su potencial para resultar en la restricción de vivienda para personas de un país u origen nacional específico, definido como una clase protegida por el Gobierno Federal. La Ordenanza fue revocada el 20 de julio de 2021, y el Acuerdo entre HUD y la Ciudad de Santa María está vigente por cinco años. Este informe anual presenta un resumen de las realizaciones y las lecciones aprendidas resultantes de la aplicación del Acuerdo.

DISCUSIÓN:

El Acuerdo especifica los plazos para el cumplimiento de r equisitos tales como el desarrollo de un Plan de Acceso Lingüístico (LAP, por sus siglas en inglés) y un plan de trabajo que implemente el LAP incluyendo la creación de un "sistema de denuncia de quejas" para cualquier presunta discriminación en la vivienda. Anualmente se lleva a cabo un Simposio/Capacitación sobre la Vivienda Justa , y la Ciudad también ha establecido un grupo de trabajo que se reúne periódicamente para discutir la Vivienda para Empleados y cualquier desafío o tema a revisar.

La Ciudad ha continuado implementando el LAP y todo el personal está capacitado en sus procedimientos. Los empleados tienen acceso a la lista de empleados municipales certificados para traducir e interpretar en el lugar de trabajo y tienen acceso a

2 documentos, formularios y folletos traducidos para imprimir y distribuir a quienes los necesiten. El sitio web de la Ciudad proporciona una función de traducción de Google para garantizar que todos los avisos, programas y otros documentos de la Ciudad se puedan traducir a cualquier idioma. El plan de trabajo para implementar el LAP incluye procedimientos que el Oficial de Recursos de Vivienda para Empleados (EHRO, por sus siglas en inglés) debe seguir si se presenta una queja relacionada con la Vivienda para Empleados. Este proceso se ha proporcionado en el sitio web de la Ciudad junto con la información de contacto de la EHRO. Hasta la fecha, la EHRO no ha recibido ninguna queja con respecto a la discriminación en la vivienda en la Ciudad o con respecto a la calidad y/o seguridad de las unidades de vivienda para empleados ocupadas.

Para fomentar la coordinación entre la Ciudad y los propietarios, operadores y residentes de Viviendas para Empleados, el Acuerdo requiere que la EHRO establezca un grupo de trabajo de Viviendas para Empleados, invitando a los propietarios/operadores de viviendas para empleados, propietarios/operadores de negocios agrícolas y defensores de los titulares de visas H2A a participar. El grupo de trabajo se ha establecido y se reunió el 17 de abril de 2024. Los temas de discusión han incluido el inventario de viviendas, los desafíos fiscales y las necesidades generales de los tra bajadores H2A. A lo largo de 2024 se llevarán a cabo reuniones adicionales con el grupo de trabajo. El Acuerdo también requiere q ue la Ciudad planifique un Simposio/Capacitación sobre la Vivienda Justa anualmente. El 14 de abril de 2023, la Fundación de As istencia Legal brindó capacitación sobre los derechos de los inquilinos. La Fundación de Asistencia Legal proporcionara la próxima capacitación en junio de 2024.

La EHRO continuará facilitando la implementación de los requisitos del Acuerdo y proporcionará al Concejo Municipal un informe anual. Este informe tiene como objetivo proporcionar al Concejo Municipal una actualización sobre el estado de cumplimiento del Acuerdo y cualquier desempeño / tendencias / lecciones aprendidas resultantes. En este momento, la Ciudad está cumpliendo con el Acuerdo y ha estado coordinando con HUD para completar todos los requisitos.

Consideraciones Fiscales
La implementación de los términos del Acuerdo por parte de la EHRO tiene cierto s impactos fiscales a la Ciudad, ya que las horas de trabajo son cubiertas por la Directora Interina del Departamento de Desarrollo Comunitario, personal adicional de la Ciudad y otros consultores de capacitación. P odría haber impactos fiscales punitivos para la Ciudad si HUD encontrara que hay un incumplimiento de los términos del Acuerdo que resultan en un incumplimiento material. Esto puede resultar en una suspensión, terminación o negativa a otorgar o continuar con la asistencia financiera federal a la Ciudad. Esta es una determinación que tomaría HUD, y la Ciudad tendría siete días para subsanar cualquier incumplimiento después de la notificación de HUD antes de que se iniciaran acciones punitivas.

Impacto a la Comunidad
La continuación de la aplicación del Acuerdo por parte de la EHRO tendrá un impacto positivo en la Comunidad. La implementación de los términos del Acuerdo continuará los

3 esfuerzos de la Ciudad de Santa María para garantizar un acceso significativo a los programas y actividades de la Ciudad para todos los residentes de Santa María.

ARCHIVOS ADJUNTOS

A. Acuerdo de Cumplimiento Voluntario Ejecutado

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity – Region IX One Sansome Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104-4430
Voice: (800) 347-3739 (415) 489-6400
TTY: (415) 489-6564 Fax: (415) 489-6560
www.hud.gov espanol.hud.gov
July 15, 2021
Mayor Alice Patino
City of Santa Maria
City Hall, 110 East Cook Street
Santa Maria, CA 93454-5190
Mayor Patino:

SUBJECT: Return of Fully Executed Voluntary Compliance Agreement and Conciliation Agreement
Recipient: City of Santa Maria
Case Numbers: 09-20-R004-6 (Title VI Compliance Review) 09-20-R001-9 (Section 109 Compliance Review)
09-20-2105-8 (Title VIII Secretary-Initiated Complaint) Attached please find the fully executed Voluntary Compliance Agreement (VCA) and Conciliation Agreement between our Department and The City of Santa Maria. The date of execution for this VCA for purposes of computing milestone and reporting dates is the date of my signature. This agreement shall remain in effect, as noted in provision III, for a period of five (5) years from the date of my signature.

The primary point-of-contact for matters related to Recipient’s compliance with the terms of this VCA is Lead Equal Opportunity Specialist Nathanael Hill, in our San Francisco Office, who can be reached by telephone at (415) 489-6541, or by e-mail at: [email protected]. All monitoring reports identified in the VCA should be addressed to Mr. Nathanael Hill at this email address, or at:

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity
One Sansome Street Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94104-4430
We appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,
Anné Quesada
Director
Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity
Region IX
Attachment A: Executed VCA

7/14/2021
7/14/21

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

BY: Director of Public Works Brett Fulgoni

SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Establishment of Angle Parking on West Cypress Street

Description:

The City Council will consider approving the establishment of angle parking on West Cypress Street between South Depot Street and South Railroad Avenue.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution approving the establishment of angle parking on West Cypress Street.

BACKGROUND:

City of Santa Maria Parks and Recreation Supervisor, Scott Christian, requested the establishment of an angled parking zone on Cypress Street between Depot Street and Railroad Avenue. This request highlights the necessity for off -site parking for employee vehicles at the new Parks Operations location.

The proposed angled parking zone prioritizes the needs of City crew members who begin their day at 6:15 AM, ensuring they have access to parking before most me mbers of the public.

DISCUSSION:

Per City Council Resolution No. 2061 and CAM 63 -15, a Traffic Committee was formed to “be responsible for the review, approval or denial, and recommendations to City Council on all matters and requests relating to traffic circulation and safety within the public right-of-way.” The Traffic Committee has reviewed the request for the angle parking zone and recommends the establishment of the angle parking zone. The City Council has the authority to locate, establish, or eliminate parking zones within the City.

The angled parking zone recommended to be established is described as follows:

2 1. Cypress Street, along the northerly curb face, beginning 20 linear feet west of the easterly driveway and continuing 120 linear feet west.

2. Cypress Street, along the southerly curb face, beginning 90 linear feet west of the driveway and continuing 120 linear feet west.

Alternative
City Council may elect to deny or modify the proposed angled parking zone.

Fiscal Considerations
The parking on West Cypress Street betwee n South Depot Street and South Railroad Avenue currently is not striped. Staff has estimated that striping the angled parking stalls on West Cypress Street between South Depot Street and South Railroad Avenue will cost $1,000. Additionally, signs will need to be posted on each side of the street, at the beginning, middle, and end of each block, which is estimated to require the installation of six signs at a cost of approximately $600. The total cost of striping and sign installation is estimated at $1,400.

Impact to the Community
The existing parallel parking on West Cypress Street between South Depot Street and South Railroad Avenue is approximately fourteen parking spots.

Angle parking on West Cypress Street between South Depot Street and South Railroad Avenue will provide an approximate increase of three additional on -street parking spots for a total of seventeen angled parking spots.

ATTACHMENTS

A. Proposed Angle Parking on West Cypress Street between South Depot Street and South Railroad Avenue

STOPSTOPS. Depot Street
W. Cypress Street
S. Railroad Avenue
Luis A. MagallónProposed Angled Parking ZoneW. Cypress StreetTitle Drawing No.Scale:Sheet:

City of Santa MariaDepartment of Public Works110 South Pine StreetSanta Maria, CA 93458Drawn By:Approved By:NTS1 of 1 N David BeasAttachment ATC-24-01
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE

ESTABLISHMENT OF ANGLE PARKING ON WEST

CYPRESS STREET

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Santa Maria to establish angle parking on certain streets within the City; and

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria Traffic Committee has reviewed and is recommending the establishment of angle parking at the location described below;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 7-5.24 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, angle parking shall be established at the following location:

1. Cypress Street, along the northerly curb face, beginning 20 linear feet west of the easterly driveway and continuing 120 linear feet west.

2. Cypress Street, along the southerly curb face, beginning 90 linear feet west of the driveway and continuing 120 linear feet west.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. The foregoing shall constitute traffic regulations pursuant to City Ordinance.

2. All work is to be accomplished using the standards and methods approved by the Director of Public Works . This shall be in accordance with standard City specifications, and the prov isions of this resolution are to be carried out by erecting signs and poles , painting marks and temporary markers, and by such other indicators or devices as may be under provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of California and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.

///

///

///

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, held this 7th of May 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
Interim City Manager

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

BY: Director of Public Works Brett Fulgoni

SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Establishment of Limited - Time Parking Zone on Dal Porto Lane

Description:

The City Council will consider approving the establishment of limited-time parking on Dal Porto Lane.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing a limited-time parking zone on Dal Porto Lane.

BACKGROUND:

Staff received a request to implement a limited -time parking zone along Dal Porto Lane.

This request stems from public safety concerns associated with vehicles parking for an extended period of time. The proposed measure entails an overnight parking restr iction, aimed at prompting vehicle owners to seek alternative overnight parking arrangements.

DISCUSSION:

Per City Council Resolution No. 2061 and CAM 63 -15, a Traffic Committee was formed to “be responsible for the review, approval or denial, and recommendations to City Council on all matters and requests relating to traffic circulation and safety within the public right-of-way.” The Traffic Committee has reviewed the request for the limited -time parking zone and recommends the establishment of the limited-time parking zone to address safety concerns for the adjacent businesses. The City Council has the author ity to locate, establish, or eliminate limited-time parking zones within the City.

The limited-time parking zone recommended to be established is described as follows:

1. Dal Porto Lane, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the northerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the northeasterly curb ramp of the 2 intersection of Dal Porto Lane and South Thornburg Street and continuing 325 linear feet west.

2. Dal Porto Lane, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the southerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southeasterly curb ramp of the intersection of Dal Porto Lane and South Thornburg Street and continuing 425 linear feet west.

Alternative
City Council may elect to deny or modify the proposed limited-time parking restriction.

Fiscal Considerations
The proposed parking restriction will require the installation of approximately six street poles and signs. The Public Works Department has estimated the cost of the poles and signs to be approximately $1,500 in staff time and materials.

Impact to the Community
Approximately 50 parking spaces will be limited during overnight hours. This parking restriction may cause any illegal camping and large vehicle parking to occur in another area of the City.

ATTACHMENTS

A. Proposed Limited Time Parking Zone to be Established on Dal Porto Lane

±

CITY OF SANTA MARIA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
110 SOUTH PINE STREET
SANTA MARIA, CA 93458

PROPOSED LIMITED TIME PARKING ZONE

DAL PORTO LANE
DRAWN BY: LUIS A. MAGALLON APPROVED BY: DAVID BEAS DRAWING NO.: TC23-33 SCALE: NTS SHEET: 1 OF 1 10PM 6AM

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA

MARIA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A LIMITED TIME PARKING

ZONE ON DAL PORTO LANE

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Santa Maria to establish limited- time parking zones at certain locations within the City; and

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria Traffic Committee has reviewed and is recommending the establishment of a limited-time parking zone at the location described below;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 7-5.14 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, a limited time parking zone shall be established on the following street, incorporated herein by reference, at the following locations by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. Dal Porto Lane, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the northerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the northeasterly curb ramp of the intersection of Dal Porto Lane and South Thornburg Street and continuing 325 linear feet west.

2. Dal Porto Lane, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the southerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southeasterly curb ramp of the intersection of Dal Porto Lane and South Thornburg Street and continuing 425 linear feet west.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. The foregoing shall constitute traffic regulations pursuant to ordinance.

2. All work is to be accomplished using the standards and methods approved by the Director of Public Works. This shall be in accordance with standard City specifications, and the provisions of this resolution are to be carried out by erecting signs, painting marks and temporary markers and barricades required, and by such other indicators or devices as may be under provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of California and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.

3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 7th day of May 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
Interim City Manager

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

BY: Director of Public Works Brett Fulgoni

SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Establishment of Limited - Time Parking Zone on Fairway Drive

Description:

The City Council will consider approving the establishment of a limited-time parking zone on Fairway Drive.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing a limited-time parking zone on Fairway Drive.

BACKGROUND:

Staff received a request to implement a limited -time parking zone along Fairway Drive.

This request stems from public safety concerns associated with vehicles parking for an extended period of time. The proposed measure entails an overnight parking restric tion, aimed at prompting vehicle owners to seek alternative overnight parking arrangements.

DISCUSSION:

Per City Council Resolution No. 2061 and CAM 63 -15, a Traffic Committee was formed to “be responsible for the review, approval or denial, and recommendations to City Council on all matters and requests relating to traffic circulation and safety within the public right-of-way.” The Traffic Committee has reviewed the request for the limited-time parking zone and recommends the establishment of the limited -time parking zone to address safety concerns for the adjacent businesses. The City Council has the author ity to locate, establish, or eliminate limited-time parking zones within the City.

The limited-time parking zone recommended to be established is described as follows:

1. Fairway Drive, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the northerly curb face, beginning 1,200 linear feet west of the intersection of Skyway Drive and Fairway Drive, and continuing west for a length of 1,700 linear feet ending at the 2 curb return of the easterly curb ramp of the intersection of Fairway Drive and A Street.

2. Fairway Drive, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the southerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southwesterly curb ramp of the intersection of Skyway Drive and Fairway Drive , and continuing west for a length of 600 linear feet ending at the curb return of the easterly curb ramp of the intersection of Fairway Drive and Airpark Drive.

3. Fairway Drive, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the southerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the westerly curb ramp at the intersection of Fairway Drive and Airpark Drive , and continuing west 2,100 linear feet west to the intersection of Fairway Drive and A Street.

Alternative
City Council may elect to deny or modify the proposed limited-time parking restriction.

Fiscal Considerations
The proposed parking restriction will require the installation of approximately 18 street poles and signs. The Public Works Department has estimated the cost of the poles and signs to be approximately $5,000 in staff time and materials.

Impact to the Community
Approximately 290 parking spaces will be limited during overnight hours. This parking restriction may cause any illegal camping and large vehicle parking to occur in another area of the City.

ATTACHMENTS

A. Proposed Limited Time Parking Zone to be Established on Fairway Drive

±

CITY OF SANTA MARIA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
110 SOUTH PINE STREET
SANTA MARIA, CA 93458

PROPOSED NO STOPPING ZONE

FAIRWAY DRIVE BETWEEN A-STREET AND SKYWAY DRIVE
DRAWN BY: LUIS A. MAGALLON APPROVED BY: DAVID BEAS DRAWING NO.: TC23-29 SCALE: NTS SHEET: 1 OF 1 10PM 6AM

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA

MARIA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A LIMITED-TIME PARKING

ZONE ON FAIRWAY DRIVE

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Santa Maria to establish limited- time parking zones at certain locations within the City; and

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria Traffic Committee has reviewed and is recommending the establishment of a limited-time zone at the location described below;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 7-5.14 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, a limited-time parking zone shall be established on the following street, incorporated herein by reference, at the following locations by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. Fairway Drive, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the northerly curb face, beginning 1,200 linear feet west of the intersection of Skyway Drive and Fairway Drive, and continuing west for a length of 1,700 linear feet ending at the curb return of the easterly curb ramp of the intersection of Fairway Drive and A Street.

2. Fairway Drive, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the southerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southwesterly curb ramp of the intersection of Skyway Drive and Fairway Drive, and continuing west for a length of 600 linear feet ending at the curb return of the easterly curb ramp of th e intersection of Fairway Drive and Airpark Drive.

3. Fairway Drive, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the southerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the westerly curb ramp at the intersection of Fairway Drive and Airpark Drive , and continuing west 2,100 linear feet west to the intersection of Fairway Drive and A Street.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. The foregoing shall constitute traffic regulations pursuant to ordinance.

2. All work is to be accomplished using the standards and methods approved by the Director of Public Works. This shall be in accordance with standard City specifications, and the provisions of this resolution are to be carried out by erecting signs, p ainting marks and temporary markers and barricades required, and by such other indicators or devices as may be under provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of California and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.

3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 7th day of May 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
Interim City Manager

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

BY: Director of Public Works Brett Fulgoni

SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Establishment of Limite d- Time Parking Zone on Thompson Way

Description:

The City Council will consider approving the establishment of a limited-time parking zone on Thompson Way.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing a limited-time parking zone on Thompson Way.

BACKGROUND:

Staff received a request to implement a limited-time parking zone along Thompson Way.

This request stems from prolonged vehicle parking in front of neighboring businesses, raising safety concerns. The proposed measure entails an overnight parking restricti on, aimed at prompting vehicle owners to seek alternative overnight parking arrangements.

DISCUSSION:

Per City Council Resolution No. 2061 and CAM 63 -15, a Traffic Committee was formed to “be responsible for the review, approval or denial, and recommenda tions to City Council on all matters and requests relating to traffic circulation and safety within the public right-of-way.” The Traffic Committee has reviewed the request for the limited-time parking zone and recommends the establishment of the limited-time parking zone to address safety concerns for the adjacent businesses. The City Council has the authority to locate, establish, or eliminate limited-time parking zones within the City.

The limited-time parking zone recommended to be established is described as follows:

1. Thompson Way, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the easterly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the easterly curb ramp at the easterly intersection of Thompson Way and West McCoy Lane, and continuing north for a 2 length of 600 linear feet then continuing west for 500 linear feet then continuing south 675 linear feet ending at the curb return of the westerly curb ramp at the westerly intersection of Thompson Way and West McCoy Lane.

2. Thompson Way, 7 days a week, from 1 0:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the westerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the westerly curb ramp at the easterly intersection of Thompson Way and West McCoy Lane, and continuing north for a length of 550 linear feet then continuing west for 400 lin ear feet then continuing south 560 linear feet ending at the curb return of the easterly curb ramp at the westerly intersection of Thompson Way and West McCoy Lane.

Alternative
City Council may elect to deny or modify the proposed limited-time parking restriction.

Fiscal Considerations
The proposed parking restriction will require the installation of approximately 12 street poles and signs. The Public Works Department has estimated the cost of the poles and signs to be approximately $1,000 in staff time and materials.

Impact to the Community
Approximately 80 parking spaces will be limited during overnight hours. However, adjacent streets have a surplus of on-street parking available.

ATTACHMENTS

A. Proposed Limited Time Parking Zone to be Established on Thompson Way

CITY OF SANTA MARIA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
110 SOUTH PINE STREET
SANTA MARIA, CA 93458

PROPOSED NO STOPPING ZONE

THOMPSON WAY
DRAWN BY: APPROVED BY:

LUIS A. MAGALLON DAVID BEAS
DRAWING NO: SCALE:

TC23-28 NTS
SHEET NO:
1 OF 1
10PM 6AM

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA

MARIA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A LIMITED TIME PARKING

ZONE ON THOMPSON WAY

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Santa Maria to establish limited- time parking zones at certain locations within the City; and

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria Traffic Committee has reviewed and is recommending the establishment of a limited-time parking zone at the location described below;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 7-5.14 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, a limited time parking zone shall be established on the following streets, incorporated herein by reference, at the following locations by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. Thompson Way, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the easterly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the easterly curb ramp at the easterly intersection of Thompson Way and West McCoy Lane, and continuing north for a length of 600 linear feet then continuing west for 500 linear feet then continuing south 675 linear feet ending at the curb return of the westerly curb ramp at the westerly intersection of Thompson Way and West McCoy Lane.

2. Thompson Way, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the westerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the westerly curb ramp at the easterly intersection of Thompson Way and West McCoy Lane, and continuing north for a length of 550 linear feet then continuing west for 400 linear feet then continuing south 560 linear feet ending at the curb return of the easterly curb ramp at the westerly intersection of Thompson Way and West McCoy Lane.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. The foregoing shall constitute traffic regulations pursuant to ordinance.

2. All work is to be accomplished using the standards and methods approved by the Director of Public Works . This shall be in accordance with standard City specifications, and the provisions of th is resolution are to be carried out by erecting signs, painting marks and temporary markers and barricades required, and by such other indicators or devices as may be under provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of California and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.

3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 7th day of May 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
Interim City Manager

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

BY: Director of Public Works Brett Fulgoni

SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Establishment of Limited Time Parking Zone on South Thornburg Street

Description:

The City Council will consider approving establishing a limited-time parking zone on South Thornburg Street.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing a limited-time parking zone on South Thornburg Street.

BACKGROUND:

Staff received a request to implement a limited-time parking zone along South Thornburg Street. This request stems from public safety concerns associated with vehicles parking for an extended period of time. The proposed measure entails an overnight parking restriction, aimed at prompting vehicle owners to seek alternative overnight parking arrangements.

DISCUSSION:

Per City Council Resolution No. 2061 and CAM 63 -15, a Traffic Committee was formed to “be responsible for the review, approval or denial, and recommendations to City Council on all matters and requests relating to traffic circulation and safety within the public right-of-way.” The Traffic Committee has reviewed the request for the limited-time parking zone and recommends the establishment of the limited-time parking zone to address safety concerns for the adjacent businesses. The City Council has the author ity to locate, establish, or eliminate limited-time parking zones within the City.

The limited-time parking zone recommended to be established is described as follows:

1. South Thornburg Street, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the easterly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southeasterly curb ramp of 2 the intersection of West Carmen Lane and South Thornburg Street, and continuing 1,550 linear feet south ending at the curb return of the easterly curb ramp of the intersection of South Thornburg Street and Betteravia Road.

2. South Thornburg Street, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the westerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southwesterly curb ramp of the intersection of West Carmen Lane and South Thornburg Street, and continuing 1,550 linear feet south ending at the curb return of the westerly curb ramp of the intersection of South Thornburg Street and Betteravia Road.

Alternative
City Council may elect to deny or modify the proposed permitted parking restriction.

Fiscal Considerations
The proposed parking restriction will require the installation of approximately 12 street poles and signs. The Public Works Department has estimated the cost of the poles and signs to be approximately $3,000 in staff time and materials.

Impact to the Community
Approximately 200 parking spaces will be limited during overnight hours. This parking restriction may cause any illegal camping and large vehicle parking to occur in another area of the City.

ATTACHMENTS

A. Proposed Limited Time Parking Zone to be Established on South Thornburg Street

CITY OF SANTA MARIA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
110 SOUTH PINE STREET
SANTA MARIA, CA 93458

PROPOSED LIMITED TIME PARKING ZONE

SOUTH THORNBURG STREET
DRAWN BY: APPROVED BY:

LUIS A. MAGALLON DAVID BEAS
DRAWING NO: SCALE:

TC23-33 NTS
SHEET NO:
1 OF 1

SOUTH THORNBURG STREET
10PM 6AM

DAL PORTO LANE

BETTERAVIA ROAD

WEST CARMEN LANE

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA

MARIA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A LIMITED-TIME PARKING

ZONE ON SOUTH THORNBURG STREET

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Santa Maria to establish limited- time parking zones at certain locations within the City; and

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria Traffic Committee has reviewed and is recommending the establishment of a limited-time parking zone at the location described below;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 7-5.14 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, a limited time parking zone shall be established on the following street, incorporated herein by reference, at the following locations by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. South Thornburg Street, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the easterly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southeasterly curb ramp of the intersection of West Carmen Lane and South Thornburg Street, and continuing 1,550 linear feet south ending at the curb return of the easterly curb ramp of the intersection of South Thornburg Street and Betteravia Road.

2. South Thornburg Street, 7 days a week, from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM, along the westerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southwesterly curb ramp of the intersection of West Carmen Lane and South Thornburg Street, and continuing 1,550 linear feet south ending at the curb return of the westerly curb ramp of the intersection of South Thornburg Street and Betteravia Road.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. The foregoing shall constitute traffic regulations pursuant to ordinance.

2. All work is to be accomplished using the standards and methods approved by the Director of Public Works . This shall be in accordance with standard City specifications, and the provisions of this resolution are to be carried out by erecting signs, painting marks and temporary markers and barricades required, and by such other indicators or devices as may be under provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of California and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.

3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 7th day of May 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
Interim City Manager

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

BY: Director of Public Works Brett Fulgoni

SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Establishment of Preferential Parking Privileges in The Pacific Crest Estates Neighborhood

Description:

The City Council will consider approving the establishment of preferential parking privileges in the Pacific Crest Estates neighborhood.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolutio n approving the establishment of preferential parking privileges to vehicles displaying a valid parking permit in the Pacific Crest Estates Neighborhood bounded by the southerly Right of Way of West Battles Road, easterly R ight of Way of Biscayne Street, northerly Right of Way of Sonya Lane, westerly Right of Way of Pergola Street, and the existing pedestrian path.

BACKGROUND:

Various residents of the Pacific Crest Estates neighborhood have requested preferential parking privileges (permit parking) be established in the Pacific Crest Estates neighborhood between the southerly Right of Way (ROW) of West Battles Road, easterly ROW of Biscayne Street, northerly ROW of Sonya Lane, westerly ROW of Pergola Street, and the existing pedestrian path. The residents have requested this parking restriction be established because residents of the Pacific Crest Estates neighborhood are being negatively impacted by residents from the adjacent apartment complexes. The residents of the Pacific Crest Estates neighborhood have had issues with blight and illicit activity, and the permit parking is anticipated to deter future nuisances. The existing No-Stopping Zones along Western Avenue will remain.

DISCUSSION:

To confirm resident support for preferential permit parking, s taff sent questionnaires to residents with property frontage in the area bounded by the streets previously identified.

The proposed parking district includes 291 properties. 253 of the 291 properties 2 responded to the questionnaire, with 249 responses in su pport of the proposed parking changes. The results of the questionnaire achieved the 85 percent approval rate requirement, as is required by the City’s Traffic Committee policy.

Per City Council Resolution No. 2061 and CAM 63 -15, a Traffic Committee was formed to “be responsible for the review, approval or denial, and recommendations to City Council on all matters and requests relating to traffic circulation and safety within the public right-of-way.” City staff brought the request to the Traffic Committe e with various neighborhood residents in attendance. The Traffic Committee discussed the issue regarding nuisance vehicles and the impacts on the Pacific Crest Estates Neighborhood residents. The Traffic Committee recommends the establishment of preferenti al permit parking between the southerly ROW of West Battles Road, the easterly ROW of Biscayne Street, the northerly ROW of Sonya Lane, the westerly ROW of Pergola Street, and the existing pedestrian path, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The existing No-Stopping Zones along Western Avenue will remain.

The Santa Maria Municipal Code, Section 7 -5.14, provides the authority to the City Council, by Resolution, to locate and designate certain areas where parking is limited or prohibited during certain hours.

Noted below are guidelines related to the proposed parking restriction:

 The proposed preferential parking privileges shall become effective at midnight on June 4, 2024. The permits expire at midnight on December 31, 2025.  Vehicles displaying a valid permit are exempt from the parking restrictions in the permit area.
 By showing proof of residency, residents may obtain a maximum of five permits per house from the Finance Department.
 The placards are displayed in the vehicles where they are visible to enforcement officers.
 The residents pay $7 per permit for the cost to print and issue the permits. This fee excludes enforcement and program maintenance costs such as pole and sign installation.

The guidelines noted above are identical for all areas throughout t he City with permitted parking. The requested restriction covers approximately 0.08 square miles of the Pacific Crest Estates Neighborhood encompassed by the southerly ROW of West Battles Road, easterly ROW of Biscayne Street, northerly ROW of Sonya Lane, westerly ROW of Pergola Street, and the existing pedestrian path. The proposed parking restriction lies along the single-family residential frontage. Additionally, the requested restriction covers approximately 11,500 linear feet, excluding driveways. This will result in the restricted use of approximately 760 parking spaces. Unrestricted on -street parking is available on the northerly right -of-way of Provance Avenue fronting the apartment complex and the easterly right-of-way of Pergola Street.

Alternative(s)
3 City Council may elect to deny or modify the proposed permitted parking restriction.

Fiscal Considerations
The proposed parking restriction will require the installation of approximately 50 street poles and signs, as well as printed parking permits. The Public Works Department has estimated the cost of the poles and signs to be approximately $5,000 in staff time and materials.

Impact to the Community
When implemented, it is anticipated that non -residents will be less likely to park in the subject area. The adjacent surrounding roadways, such as the easterly ROW of Pergola Street may experience an increase in parked vehicles that do not belong to the pr operty owner. Residents and non -residents who park in the permitted parking district may receive parking citations for parking without a permit.

ATTACHMENTS

A. Proposed Preferential Parking Privileges for the Pacific Crest Estates Neighborhood

Western Avenue
Biscayne Street
Proposed No Stopping ZoneProposed No Stopping Zone
2020
120150
2525
STOPSTOP2020Proposed No Stopping ZoneProposed No Stopping Zone

STOP STOP STOP STOP

STOPSTOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP

STOPSTOPSTOPSTOP STOPSTOP
STOP3030
30 30

R RR R

R RR R
40 STOP STOP STOP STOP

STOPSTOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP

STOPSTOPSTOPSTOP STOPSTOP
STOP3030
30 30

R RR R

R RR R
40 Sonya Lane
Damask Court
Provance Avenue
Anabelle StreetBelmont Court
Paraiso Drive
Capitola StreetBiscayne Street
Battles Road
Rimes Court
Capitola Street
Adler Court
Paraiso Drive
Granada Street
Western Avenue
Menusa Court
Janelle LaneNartatez Court
Pedestrian Path
Provance AvenueSonya LaneBurgundy CourtAlba Court
Pergola Street
Luis A. MagallónProposed Permit Parking DistrictPacific Crest EstatesTitle Drawing No.Scale:Sheet:

City of Santa MariaDepartment of Public Works110 South Pine StreetSanta Maria, CA 93458Drawn By:Approved By:NTS1 of 1 N David BeasTC-24-04Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA

MARIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF

PREFERENTIAL PARKING PRIVILEGES TO VEHICLES DISPLAYING A

VALID PARKING PERMIT IN THE PACIFIC CREST ESTATES

NEIGHBORHOOD BOUNDED BY THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF

WEST BATTLES ROAD, EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF BISCAYNE

STREET, NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SONYA LANE, WESTERLY

RIGHT OF WAY OF PERGOLA STREET, AND THE EXISTING
PEDESTRIAN PATH.

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Santa Maria to establish permit parking zones at certain locations within the City; and

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria Traffic Committee has reviewed the issue and recommended the establishment of permit parking zones at the locations described below.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. Pursuant to Section 7-5.14 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, a permit parking zone is to be established effective 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at the following locations:

Capitola Street - along the westerly right-of-way of Capitola Street, the permit parking zone shall begin at the northerly right-of-way of Anabelle Street and end at the southerly right-of-way of Granada Street.

Capitola Street - along the easterly right-of-way of Capitola Street, the permit parking zone shall begin at the southerly right-of-way of Anabelle Street and end at the northerly right-of-way of Granada Street.

Anabelle Street - along the northerly right -of-way of Anabelle Street, the permit parking zone shall begin at the westerly right-of-way of Capitola Street and end at the easterly right-of-way of Paraiso Drive.

Anabelle Street - along the southerly right -of-way of Anabelle Street, the permit parking zone shall begin at the easterly right-of-way of Capitola Street and end at the westerly right-of-way of Paraiso Drive.

Belmont Court - along the westerly right-of-way of Belmont Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the southerly right-of-way of Anabelle Street and end at the cul-de-sac of Belmont Court.

Belmont Court - along the easterly right-of-way of Belmont Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the southerly right-of-way of Anabelle Street and end at the cul-de-sac of Belmont Court.

2 Paraiso Drive - along the westerly right-of-way of Paraiso Drive, the permit parking zone shall begin at the southerly right-of-way of Anabelle Street and end at the northerly right-of-way of Granada Street.

Paraiso Drive - along the easterly right-of-way of Paraiso Drive, the permit parking zone shall begin at the northerly right-of-way of Anabelle Street and end at the southerly right-of-way of Granada Street.

Granada Street - along the northerly right -of-way of Granada Street, the permit parking zone shall begin at the easterly right-of-way of Capitola Street and end at the westerly right-of-way of Paraiso Drive.

Granada Street - along the southerly right-of-way of Granada Street, the permit parking zone shall begin at the westerly right-of-way of Capitola Street and end at the easterly right-of-way of Paraiso Drive.

Adler Court - along the westerly right -of-way of Adler Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the northerly right-of-way of Granada Street and end at the cul-de-sac of Adler Court.

Adler Court - along the easterly right-of-way of Adler Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the northerly right-of-way of Granada Street and end at the cul-de-sac of Adler Court.

Burgundy Court - along the northerly right-of-way of Burgundy Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the easterly right-of-way of Western Avenue and end at the cul-de-sac of Burgundy Court.

Burgundy Court - along the southerly right-of-way of Burgundy Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the easterly right-of-way of Western Avenue and end at the cul-de-sac of Burgundy Court.

Alba Court - along the northerly right-of-way of Alba Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the easterly right-of-way of Western Avenue and end at the cul-de-sac of Alba Court.

Alba Court - along the southerly right-of-way of Alba Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the easterly right-of-way of Western Avenue and end at the cul-de-sac of Alba Court.

Damask Court - along the northerly right-of-way of Damask Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the westerly right-of-way of Pergola Street and end at the cul-de-sac of Damask Court.

Damask Court - along the southerly right-of-way of Damask Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the westerly right-of-way of Pegola Street and end at the cul-de-sac of Damask Court.
3 Rimes Court - along the northerly right-of-way of Rimes Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the westerly right-of-way of Pergola Street and end at the cul-de-sac of Rimes Court.

Rimes Court - along the southerly right-of-way of Rimes Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the westerly right-of-way of Pergola Street and end at the cul-de-sac of Rimes Court.

Nartatez Court - along the northerly right-of-way of Nartatez Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the easterly right-of-way of Western Avenue and end at the cul-de-sac of Nartatez Court.

Nartatez Court - along the southerly right-of-way of Nartatez Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the easterly right-of-way of Western Avenue and end at the cul-de-sac of Nartatez Court.

Janelle Lane - along the westerly right-of-way of Janelle Lane, the permit parking zone shall begin at the northerly right-of-way of Nartatez Court and end at the northerly right-of-way of Menusa Court.

Janelle Lane - along the easterly right-of-way of Janelle Lane, the permit parking zone shall begin at the northerly right-of-way of Nartatez Court and end at the southerly right-of-way of Menusa Court.

Menusa Court - along the northerly right-of-way of Menusa Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the westerly right-of-way of Janelle Lane and end at the cul-de-sac of Menusa Court.

Menusa Court - along the southerly right-of-way of Menusa Court, the permit parking zone shall begin at the easterly right-of-way of Janella Lane and end at the cul-de-sac of Menusa Court.

Provance Avenue - along the northerly right-of-way of Provance Avenue, the permit parking zone shall begin at the easterly right-of-way of Biscayne Street and end at the existing pedestrian path.

Provance Avenue - along the southerly right-of-way of Provance Avenue, the permit parking zone shall begin at the easterly right-of-way of Biscayne Street and end at the westerly right-of-way of Pergola Street.

Pergola Street - along the westerly right-of-way of Pergola Street, the permit parking zone shall begin at the southerly right-of-way of Provance Avenue and end at the northerly right-of-way of Sonya Lane.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. The foregoing shall constitute traffic regulations pursuant to the City's Ordinance. 4 2. All work is to be accomplished using the standards and methods approved by the Director of Public Works. This shall be in accordance with standard City specifications, and the provisions of this Resolution are to be carried out by erecting signs, and by such other indicators or devices as may be under provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of California and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.

3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorn ey concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 7th day of May 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
Interim City Manager

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

SUBJECT: The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act

Description:

The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution opposing Initiative No. 21 -0042A1, the “Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act”.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution opposing Ballot Initiative No 21 -0042A1, the “Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act”.

BACKGROUND:

In February 2023, the “Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act,” or Initiative No. 21 -0042A1, sponsored by the California Business Roundtable, the Commercial Real Estate Development Association , and others, qualified for the November 5, 2024, General Election ballot. This measure would amend the California Constitution with provisions that limit voters’ authority and input, adopt new and stricter rules for raising taxes and fees, and may make it more difficult to impose fines and penalties for violation of State and local laws.

DISCUSSION:

This initiative would affect any new or increased tax or fee adopted by the Legislature, a city council, or the local voters after January 1, 2022. It would require that any tax or fee adopted after that date must comply with the measure’s new rules or be void unless readopted in compliance. Failure to readopt a tax measure in compliance with the initiative would result in voiding of the original tax measure, one year after the effective date of the initiative.

If passed, the initiative would impact the hundreds of fees charged by the City, from rentals, licenses, permits, user fees , and the Utility Department’s water and wastewater rates – all of which recover operational costs. The City already does not recover the full cost of services per the City Council's direction to raise user fees incrementally.

Fortunately, the City’s Measure U sales tax is exempt from this initiative because Santa Maria voters passed that the local measure in November 2018. 2 Reductions in local government tax and fee revenues have impacts on core services and infrastructure including fire and emergency response, law enforcement, streets and roads, drinking water, sewer sanitation, parks, and libraries.

Additionally, the initiative would amend the State Constitution to expand and define all State and local levies, charges, and fees as tax or exempt charges; increase the requirement for voter approval of new or increased state and local taxes; include a sunset date for new or increased taxes adopted after January 1, 2022; expressly prohibit local advisory measures (no measure may appear on the ballot allowing local voters to express a preference for how local general tax dollars should be spent); and require voter approval to expand existing taxes to new territory (e.g., annexations) or to expand the tax base (e.g. new utility service).

The changes to the State Constitution would include defining how a charge could be calculated for providing a service. An “Actual Co st” of providing a service or product means the minimum amount necessary to reimburse the government for the cost of providing the service or product to the payor. In computing the “actual cost” the maximum amount that may be imposed is the actual cost less all other sources of revenue including, but not limited to taxes, other exempt charges, grants, and state or federal funds received to provide such service or product.

The City Council will receive a presentation by the League of California Cities’ Regi onal Public Affairs Manager, Dave Mullinax, about the negative financial impact on Santa Maria and other cities.

Fiscal Considerations
If approved by the voters, the initiative would significantly limit the City’s ability to recover costs incurred to provide necessary and in -demand public services and to maintain current levels of service. City fees are necessary to cover operational costs and outstanding funding obligations such as core services and infrastructure including fire and emergency response, law enforcement, streets and roads, drinking water, sewer sanitation, parks and libraries. The City, like many other governments, is struggling to maintain services as rising expenses exceed revenues. The City projects a $20 million gap in its 2024 -26 budget.

ATTACHMENTS

A. Initiative No. 21-0042A1

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING BALLOT
INITIATIVE NO 21-0042A1 THE “TAXPAYER PROTECTION AND
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY ACT”

WHEREAS, Initiative 21 -0042A1, “Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act”, a ballot measure currently eligible for the November 2024 statewide ballot, includes provisions that would make it more difficult for local voters to pass measures needed to fund local services and infrastructure;

WHEREAS, this measure includes provisions that retroact ively cancel measures recently passed by voters and would limit voter input by prohibiting local advisory measures where voters provide direction on how they want their local tax dollars spent ; and

WHEREAS, the measure would make it much more difficult for State and local regulators to issue fines and levies on corporations that violate laws intended to protect our environment, public health and safety, and our neighborhoods, and

WHEREAS, the measure contains language that would require voter approval to expand any existing taxes (e.g. utility, transient occupancy) to annexations, creating an additional financial cost to the City for the annexation of property; and

WHEREAS, due to the City Council raising fees incrementally the full cost of services is not currently recovered, and this initiative would significantly affect those revenue sources; and

WHEREAS, this measure, if enacted, would require a fine or penalty, including any applicable interest for nonpayment, imposed by a local government administrative enforcement agency pursuant to adjudicatory due process to punish a violation of a law.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. The City Council opposes Initiative #21-0042A1, the “Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act”; and

2. The City Council will join the “ Stop the Corporate Tax Trick” coalition, a growing coalition of public safety, education, labor, local government, and infrastructure groups throughout the State; and

3. The City Council opposes Initiative #21 -0042A1, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act; and

4. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 7th day of May 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
Interim City Manager

BELL, MCANDREWS & HILTACHK, LLP
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSEI..ORS AT l..AW
455 CAPlTOL MALL, SUITE 600
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814
(916) 442-7757
FAX (916) 442-7759
www.bmhlaw.com
January 4, 2022
Anabel Renteria
Initiative Coordinator
2 1 - 0 0 4 2

RECEIVED
JAN O 4 2022
Arndt# I
Office of the Attorney General
State of California

INITIATIVE COORDINATOR

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
PO Box 994255
Sacramento, CA 94244-25550
Re: Initiative 21-0042 - Amendment Number One
Dear Initiative Coordinator:

Pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 9002 of the Elections Code, enclosed please find Amendment #1 to Initiative No. 21-0042 "The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act." The amendments are reasonably germane to the theme, purpose or subject of the initiative measure as originally proposed.

I am the proponent of the measure and request that the Attorney General prepare a circulating title and summary of the measure as provided by law, using the amended language.

Thank you for your time and attention processing my request.

Sincere
tp,,,
Thomas W. Hiltachk
Attachment A
2 1 - 0 0 4 2 Arndt. # /
The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act [Deleted codified text is denoted in strikeout. Added codified text is denoted by italics and underline.] Section 1. Title
This Act shall be known, and may be cited as, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act.

Section 2. Findings and Declarations
(a) Californians are overtaxed. We pay the nation's highest state income tax, sales tax, and gasoline tax. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, California's combined state and local tax burden is the highest in the nation. Despite this, and despite two consecutive years of obscene revenue surpluses, state politicians in 2021 alone introduced legislation to raise more than $234 billion in new and higher taxes and fees.
(b) Taxes are only part of the reason for California's rising cost-of-living crisis. Californians pay billions more in hidden "fees" passed through to consumers in the price they pay for products, services, food, fuel, utilities and housing. Since 2010, government revenue from state and local "fees" has more than doubled.
(c) California's high cost of living not only contributes to the state's skyrocketing rates of poverty and homelessness, they are the pushing working families and job-providing businesses out of the state. The most recent Census showed that California's population dropped for the first time in history, costing us a seat in Congress. In the past four years, nearly 300 major corporations relocated to other states, not counting thousands more small businesses that were forced to move, sell or close. (d) California voters have tried repeatedly, at great expense, to assert control over whether and how taxes and fees are raised. We have enacted a series of measures to make taxes more predictable, to limit what passes as a "fee," to require voter approval, and to guarantee transparency and accountability. These measures include Proposition 13 (1978), Proposition 62 (1986), Proposition 218 (1996), and Proposition 26 (2010).
(e) Contrary to the voters' intent, these measures that were designed to control taxes, spending and accountability , have been weakened and hamstrung by the Legislature, government lawyers, and the courts, making it necessary to pass yet another initiative to close loopholes and reverse hostile court decisions.

Section 3. Statement of Purpose
(a) In enacting this measure, the voters reassert their right to a voice and a vote on new and higher taxes by requiring any new or higher tax to be put before voters for approval. Voters also intend that all fees and other charges are passed or rejected by the voters themselves or a governing body elected by voters and not unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats.
(b) Furthermore, the purpose and intent of the voters in enacting this measure is to increase transparency and accountability over higher taxes and charges by requiring any tax measure placed on the ballot- 1 either at the state or local level-to clearly state the type and rate of any tax, how long it will be in effect , and the use of the revenue generated by the tax.
(c) Furthermore, the purpose and intent of the voters in enacting this measure is to clarify that any new or increased form of state government revenue, by any name or manner of extraction paid directly or indirectly by Californians, shall be authorized only by a vote of the Legislature and signature of the Governor to ensure that the purposes for such charges are broadly supported and transparently debated. (d) Furthermore, the purpose and intent of the voters in enacting this measure is also to ensure that taxpayers have the right and ability to effectively balance new or increased taxes and other charges with the rapidly increasing costs Californians are already paying for housing, food, childcare, gasoline, energy , healthcare, education, and other basic costs of living, and to further protect the existing constitutional limit on property taxes and ensure that the revenue from such taxes remains local, without changing or superseding existing constitutional provisions contained in Section 1{c) of Article XIII A. (e) In enacting this measure, the voters also additionally intend to reverse loopholes in the legislative two­ thirds vote and voter approval requirements for government revenue increases created by the courts includin g, but not limited to, Cannabis Coalition v. City of Upland, Chamber of Commerce v. Air Resources Board, Schmeer v. Los Angeles County, Johnson v. County of Mendocino, Citizens Assn. of Sunset Beach v.

Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission, and Wilde v. City of Dunsmuir.

Section 4. Section 3 of Article XIII A of the California Constitution is amended to read:

Sec. 3(a} Every levy, charge. or exaction of any kind imposed by state law is either a tax or an exempt charge.
illlJ1l ~ Any change in state statute Jaw which results in any taxpayer paying a new or higher tax must be imposed by an act passed by not less than two-thirds of all members elected to each of the two houses of the Legislature , and submitted to the electorate and approved by a maiority vote, except that no new ad valorem taxes on real property, or sales or transaction taxes on the sales of real property, may be imposed. Each Act shall include:
(A) A specific duration of time that the tax will be imposed and an estimate of the annual amount expected to be derived from the tax.
(BJ A specific and legally binding and enforceable limitation on how the revenue from the tax can be spent.

If the revenue from the tax can be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes. then a statement that the tax revenue can be spent for "unrestricted general revenue purposes" shall be included in a separate, stand-alone section. Any proposed change to the use of the revenue from the tax shall be adopted by a separate act that is passed by not less than two-thirds of all members elected to each of the two houses of the Legislature and submitted to the electorate and approved by a maiority vote. (2) The title and summary and ballot label or question required for a measure pursuant to the Elections Code shall. for each measure providing for the imposition of a tax, including a measure proposed by an elector pursuant to Article II, include:
{A) The type and amount or rate of the tax;
(BJ The duration of the tax: and
2 (CJ The use of the revenue derived from the tax.
(c} Any change in state law which results in any taxpayer paying a new or higher exempt charge must be imposed by an act passed by each of the two houses of the Legislature. Each act shall specify the type of exempt charge as provided in subdivision (e ), and the amount or rate of the exempt charge to be imposed.

Ml._fbt As used in this section and in Section 9 of Article II, "tax" means every aA1f levy, charge, or exaction of any kind imposed by the State state law that is not an exempt charge. e1<eept the follo•Ning:
(e) As used in this section. "exempt charge" means only the following:
(1) a el:iarge imposes fer a s1=1eeifie eenefit eonferreEl or pri'+'ilege granteEl aireetly to tl:ie 13ayor tl:iat is not 1=1ro>viaeEl to tl:iose not et:iargeEI, anEI whiel:i aoes not e1<ceeEl tl:ie reasonal3Ie costs to tl:ie State of eonferring the benefit or granting the pri¥ilege to the 1=1a¥OF.
ill {-2+ A reasonable charge irnposeEl for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the rnasonable actual costs to the State of providing the service or product to the payor. f.11 ~ A charge in,poseEl for the reasonable regulatory costs to the State incident to issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof. (3) A levy, charge. or exaction collected from local units of government. health care providers or health care service plans that is primarily used by the State of California for the purposes of increasing reimbursement rates or payments under the Medi-Cal program, and the revenues of which are primarily used to finance the non-federal portion of Medi-Cal medical assistance expenditures. (4) A reasonable charge iR'l13oseEl for entrance to or use of state property, or the purchase. rental, or lease of state property, except charges governed by Section 15 of Article XI. (5} A fine, or penalty, or other monetary el:large including any applicable interest for nonpayment thereot imposed by the judicial branch of government or the State, as a result of a state administrative enforcement agency pursuant to adiudicatorv due process, to punish a violation of law. (6} A levy, charge, assessment, or exaction collected for the promotion of California tourism pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 13995) of Part 4.7 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. flL~Any tax or exempt charge adopted after January 1, 2022 ~, but prior to the effective date of this act, that was not adopted in compliance with the requirements of this section is void 12 months after the effective date of this act unless the tax or exempt charge is reenacted B'l the begislatuFe anel signea into law ey tl:ie <iio¥ernoF in compliance with the requirements of this section. [gl[.JlJG:} The State bears the burden of proving by a preponEleranee oftl:le clear and convincing evidence that a levy, charge, or other exaction is an exempt charge and not a tax. The State bears the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the amount of the exempt charge is reasonable and that the amount charged does not exceed the actual cost of providing the service or product to the payor. ,tR-a-t tl:ie amouRt is RO n,ore tl:ian neeessary to cover the reasonable costs of the go•.•emn,ental actii,•i:t>,• ane 3 that the manner in •Nhiel.:i these cests are allecated ts a pa·1er bear a fair er reasenable relatienshi13 ts the 13a·1or's b1:1relens on, or benefits reeei11eel from, the go•.ieFRmental actit.iit'( (2) The retention ofrevenue by, or the payment to. a non-governmental entity ofa levv. charge, or exaction of any kind imposed by state law, shall not be a factor in determining whether the levy. charge, or exaction is a tax or exempt charge.
(3) The characterization of a levy, charge, or exaction of any kind as being voluntary, or paid in exchange for a benefit, privilege, allowance, authorization, or asset, shall not be a factor in determining whether the levy, charge, or exaction is a tax or an exempt charge. /4} The use of revenue derived from the levy, charge or exaction shall be a factor in determining whether the levy, charge, or exaction is a tax or exempt charge. (h) As used in this section:
(1) "Actual cost" of providing a service or product means: (i) the minimum amount necessary to reimburse the government for the cost of providing the service or product to the payor, and {ii) where the amount charged is not used by the government for any purpose other than reimbursing that cost. In computing "actual cost" the maximum amount that may be imposed is the actual cost less all other sources of revenue including, but not limited to taxes, other exempt charges, grants, and state or federal funds received to provide such service or product.
(2) "Extend" includes, but is not limited to, doing any of the following with respect to a tax or exempt charge: lengthening its duration. delaying or eliminating its expiration, expanding its application to a new territory or class ofpayor, or expanding the base to which its rate is applied. (3) "Impose" means adopt, enact, reenact, create, establish, collect, increase or extend. (4) "State law" includes, but is not limited to. any state statute, state regulation, state executive order. state resolution, state ruling, state opinion Jetter, or other legal authority or interpretation adopted, enacted. enforced, issued, or implemented by the legislative or executive branches of state government. "State law" does not include actions taken by the Regents of the University of California, Trustees of the California State University, or the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges.

Section 5. Section 1 of Article XIII C of the California Constitution is amended, to read:

Sec. 1. Definitions. As used in this article:
{a) "Actual cost" of providing a service or product means: (i) the minimum amount necessary to reimburse the government for the cost of providing the service or product to the payor. and {ii) where the amount charged is not used by the government for any purpose other than reimbursing that cost. In computing "actual cost" the maximum amount that may be imposed is the actual cost less all other sources of revenue including, but not limited to taxes. other exempt charges, grants, and state or federal funds received to provide such service or product.
(b) "Extend" includes, but is not limited to. doing any of the following with respect to a tax. exempt charge, or Article XIII D assessment. fee, or charge: lengthening its duration, delaying or eliminating its expiration. expanding its application to a new territory or class of payor, or expanding the base to which its rate is applied.
4 .lfl..W
11 General tax" means any tax imposed for general governmental purposes. (d} "Impose" means adopt, enact, reenact, create, establish, collect, increase, or extend. {clJb} "Local government" means any county, city, city and county, including a charter city or county, any special district, or any other local or regional governmental entity, or an elector pursuant to Article fl or the initiative power provided by a charter or statute . (f) "Local law" includes. but is not limited to, any ordinance, resolution, regulation. ruling, opinion letter, or other legal authority or interpretation adopted, enacted, enforced, issued, or implemented by a local government.
{gl_{t} "Special district" means an agency of the State, formed pursuant to general law or a special act, for the local performance of governmental or proprietary functions with limited geographic boundaries including, but not limited to, school districts and redevelopment agencies. f11L{d} "Special tax" means any tax imposed for specific purposes, including a tax imposed for specific purposes, which is placed into a general fund.
111 i@} As used in this article, and in Section 9 of Article II, "tax" means every aRV-levy, charge, or exaction of any kind, imposed by a local go,;ernmeRt law that is not an exempt charge., exeept tl=le fellowiRg:
(i) As used in this section, "exempt charge" means only the following:
(1) A cl=large imposeel fer a speeifie beAefit eoAferreel or pri,;ilege graAteel eliFeetl')' to tl=le pa1,ior tl=lat is Rot pre1,•ieleel to these Rot ehargea, aA£l which £lees Rot exeeeel tl=le reaseAable costs to tl=le loeal gm,·ernFAeAt of conferriAg the beAefit or graAting tl:1e pri¥ilege.
ill R} A reasonable charge imposes for a specific local government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasoAable actual costs to the local government of providing the service or product. fl1 WA charge im13ose£l for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof.

W {4t A reasonable charge imposeel for entrance to or use of local government property, or the purchase, rental, or lease of local government property.

Ml. fSt A fine, or penalty, or other FAOA@tar,· eharge including any applicable interest for nonpayment thereat imposed by the judicial branch of government or a local government administrative enforcement agency pursuant to adiudicatorv due process, as a res1,1lt of to punish a violation of law. ill -f6t A charge imposed as a condition of property development. No levv, charge, or exaction regulating or related to vehicle miles traveled may be imposed as a condition of property development or occupancy. f.i1 f7t An AssessFAeRts a Rel property relate el fees assessment. fee. or charge imJ;1oseel iA aeeoraanee witl=l the pro¥isio A5 of subject to Article XI 11 D, or an assessment imposed upon a business in a tourism marketing district, a parking and business improvement area, or a property and business improvement district. 5 (7) A charge imposed for a specific health care service provided directly to the payor and that is not provided to those not charged. and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the health care service. As used in this paragraph, a "health care service" means a service licensed or exempt from licensure by the state pursuant to Chapters 1. 1.3, or 2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code.

The local government bears the b1:1rden of proving by a preponderance of the e .. ·ielence that a lew, charge, or other exaction is not a ta1<, that the amo1:1nt is no more than necessaPJ' to cover the reasonable costs of the go•,ernfflental acti•.«ity anel that tJ:ie manner in which those costs are allocateel to a pa•ror bear a fair or reasonable relationship to the pa•ror's blslrdens on, or bene:fits receiveel from, the go1a1ernmental acfa•ity.

Section 6. Section 2 of Article XIII C of the California Constitution is amended to read :

Sec. 2. Local Government Tax Limitation. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Constitution:
(a) Every levy. charge. or exaction of any kind imposed by local law is either a tax or an exempt charge. All taxes imposed by any local government shall be deemed to be either general taxes or special taxes. Special purpose districts or agencies, including school districts, shall have no power to levy general taxes. (b) No local Jaw go,.·ernment whether proposed by the governing body or by an elector, may impose, extend, or increase any general tax unless and until that tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by a majority vote. A general tax shall not be deemed to have been increased if it is imposed at a rate not higher than the maximum rate so approved. The election required by this subdivision shall be consolidated with a regularly scheduled general election for members of the governing body of the local government, except in cases of emergency declared by a unanimous vote of the governing body. (c) An•r general tax imposed, el<tended, or increaseel, •.-.iitho1:1t •.·oter approval, lay any local go,.·ernment on or after Janlslary 1, 1995, ana prior ta the effecti,.·e date of this article, shall contin1:1e to be imposed only if appro,.·ea b1• a majority vote of the voters voting in an election OR the issye of the in:iposition, whicl::i election sl::iall be l::ield witl::iin t•Ne 1•ears ef the effectii.ie date of this article and in com13liance with slslbdi\·isien (b}. {El) No local law government. whether proposed by the governing body or by an elector. may impose, eMteRd, er increase any special tax unless and until that tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by a two-thirds vote. A special tax shall not be deemed to have been increased if it is imposed at a rate not higher than the maximum rate so approved. {d) The title and summary and ballot label or question required for a measure pursuant to the Elections Code shall. for each measure providing for the imposition of a tax, include:
(1) The type and amount or rate of the tax;
(2) the duration of the tax; and
(3) The use of the revenue derived from the tax. If the proposed tax is a general tax. the phrase "for general government use" shall be required, and no advisory measure may appear on the same ballot that would indicate that the revenue from the general tax will. could. or should be used for a specific purpose. (e) Only the governing body of a local government. other than an elector pursuant to Article II or the initiative power provided by a charter or statute. shall have the authority to impose any exempt charge.

The governing body shall impose an exempt charge by an ordinance specifying the type of exempt charge 6 as provided in Section l(i) and the amount or rate of the exempt charge to be imposed. and passed by the governing body. This subdivision shall not apply to charges specified in paragraph (7) of subdivision (i) of Section 1.
ff) No amendment to a Charter which provides for the imposition, extension, or increase of a tax or exempt charge shall be submitted to or approved by the electors. nor shall any such amendment to a Charter hereafter submitted to or approved by the electors become effective for any purpose. (q) Any tax or exempt charge adopted after January 1, 2022, but prior to the effective date of this act, that was not adopted in compliance with the requirements of this section is void 12 months after the effective date of this act unless the tax or exempt charge is reenacted in compliance with the requirements of this section.
{h)(1) The focal government bears the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that a levy, charge or exaction is an exempt charge and not a tax. The local government bears the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the amount of the exempt charge is reasonable and that the amount charged does not exceed the actual cost of providing the service or product to the payor. (2} The retention of revenue by, or the payment to, a non-governmental entity of a levy. charge, or exaction of any kind imposed by a local law, shall not be a factor in determining whether the levy, charge, or exaction is a tax or exempt charge.
(3) The characterization of a levy. charge. or exaction of any kind imposed by a local law as being paid in exchange for a benefit. privilege, allowance, authorization, or asset, shall not be factors in determining whether the levy, charge, or exaction is a tax or an exempt charge. (4) The use of revenue derived from the levy, charge or exaction shall be a factor in determining whether the levy, charge, or exaction is a tax or exempt charge.

Section 7. Section 3 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution is amended, to read:

Sec. 3. Property Taxes, Assessments, Fees and Charges Limited (a) No tax, assessment, fee, 6f charge, or surcharge, including a surcharge based on the value ofpropertv, shall be assessed 13y a Ry ageRC'f upon any parcel of property or upon any person as an incident of property ownership except:
(1) The ad valorem property tax impeseEI p1::1rsYaRt te described in Section 1(a) of Article XIII and Section 1/a) of Article XIII A, and described and enacted pursuant to the voter approval requirement in Section 1/b) Q[Article XII I A.
(2) Any special non-ad valorem tax receiving a two-thirds vote of qualified electors pursuant to Section 4 of Article XIII A, or after receiving a two-thirds vote of those authorized to vote in a community facilities district by the Legislature pursuant to statute as it existed on December 31, 2021. (3) Assessments as provided by this article.
(4) Fees or charges for property related services as provided by this article. 7 (b) For purposes of this article, fees for the provision of electrical or gas service shall not be deemed charges or fees imposed as an incident of property ownership.

Section 8. Sections 1 and 14 of Article XIII are amended to read:

Sec. 1 Unless otherwise provided by this Constitution or the laws of the United States:
(a) All property is taxable and shall be assessed at the same percentage of fair market value. When a value standard other than fair market value is prescribed by this Constitution or by statute authorized by this Constitution, the same percentage shall be applied to determine the assessed value. The value to which the percentage is applied, whether it be the fair market value or not, shall be known for property tax purposes as the full value.
(b) All property so assessed shall be taxed in proportion to its full value. (c) All proceeds from the taxation of property shall be apportioned according to law to the districts within the counties.

Sec. 14. All property taxed by state or local government shall be assessed in the county, city, and district in which it is situated. Notwithstanding any other provision of/aw, such state or local property taxes shall be apportioned according to law to the districts within the counties.

Section 9. General Provisions
A. This Act shall be liberally construed in order to effectuate its purposes.

B. (1) In the event that this initiative measure and another initiative measure or measures relating to state or local requirements for the imposition, adoption, creation, or establishment of taxes, charges, and other revenue measures shall appear on the same statewide election ballot, the other initiative measure or measures shall be deemed to be in conflict with this measure. In the event that this initiative measure receives a greater number of affirmative votes, the provisions of this measure shall prevail in their entirety, and the provisions ofthe other initiative measure or measures shall be null and void. (2) In furtherance of this provision, the voters hereby declare that this measure conflicts with the provisions of the "Housing Affordabili ty and Tax Cut Act of 2022" and "The Tax Cut and Housing Affordability Act," both of which would impose a new state property tax (called a "surcharge") on certain real property, and where the revenue derived from the tax is provided to the State, rather than retained in the county in which the property is situated and for the use of the county and cities and districts within the county, in direct violation of the provisions of this initiative. (3) If this initiative measure is approved by the voters, but superseded in whole or in part by any other conflicting initiative measure approved by the voters at the same election, and such conflicting initiative is later held invalid, this measure shall be self-executing and given full force and effect.

C. The provisions of this Act are severable. If any portion, section, subdivision, paragraph, clause, sentence, phrase, word, or application of this Act is for any reason held to be invalid by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Act. The People of the State of California hereby declare that they would have adopted this Act and each and every portion, section, subdivision, paragraph, clause, sentence, phrase, word, and application not 8 declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of this Act or application thereof would be subsequently declared invalid.

D. If this Act is approved by the voters of the State of California and thereafter subjected to a legal challenge alleging a violation of state or federal law, and both the Governor and Attorney General refuse to defend this Act, then the following actions shall be taken:
(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Chapter 6 of Part 2 of Division 3 ofTitle 2 of the Government Code or any other law, the Attorney General shall appoint independent counsel to faithfully and vigorously defend this Act on behalf of the State of California. (2) Before appointing or thereafter substituting independent counsel, the Attorney General shall exercise due diligence in determining the qualifications of independent counsel and shall obtain written affirmation from independent counsel that independent counsel will faithfully and vigorously defend this Act. The written affirmation shall be made publicly available upon request. (3) A continuous appropriation is hereby made from the General Fund to the Controller, without regard to fiscal years, in an amount necessary to cover the costs of retaining independent counsel to faithfully and vigorously defend this Act on behalf of the State of California. (4) Nothing in this section shall prohibit the proponents of this Act, or a bona fide taxpayers association, from intervening to defend this Act.
9 FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

BY: Assistant City Manager Chuen Wu

SUBJECT: Conceptual Review of Proposed Downtown Redevelopment by the Vernon Group on City-Owned Parcels

The City Council will provide comments to address the applicant’s request and provide further direction to City staff regarding the proposed downtown redevelopment as part of a future sales and disposition agreement between Vernon Pro perty Group, LLC and the City of Santa Maria.

BACKGROUND:

The City Council has consistently identified the revitalization and redevelopment of Santa Maria’s downtown as a goal and priority. The City has adopted plans to establish a vision and to facilitate the redevelopment of downtown, including an update to the Downtown Specific Plan in 2015 and the adoption of the Downtown Streetscape Plan in 2019.

To further stimulate Downtown redevelopment, the City identified specific City -owned parcels for development, including the northerly parking lot adjacent to the old Fallas/Mervyn’s building and Broadway (Lot 1), the northeast and southeast corners of Main and Broadway (Lot 2 and 3, respectively), and the parking lot east of the Ruffoni building adjacent to Lincoln (Lot 4). The City and the Chamber of Commerce worked together to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) in September 2020, and four proposals were received in response to the RFP. In January 2021, the City selected the Vernon Property Group, LLC (Vernon Group) based on their submitted project design and team qualifications. The proposed project design included several hundred multi-family housing units, ground-floor commercial retail, and other public amenities, including plazas and open spaces (see Attachment A). This mix of housing, commercial, and gathering spaces, within close proximity to each other, meets the vision of a vibrant and pedestrian-friendly downtown.

In the summer of 2021, the City completed State Surplus Lands Act requirements , including all required notifications and good -faith negotiations. In 2022 and 2023, City staff and Vernon Group continued to work together toward a global sales and disposition agreement that includes all four identified City -owned lots. The City and Ver non Group also discussed Surplus Lands Act requirements with State Housing and Community Development (HCD), including the requirement of setting aside 25 percent of all proposed housing units as income -restricted affordable housing. State HCD had initially communicated to the City that each City-owned lot would need a 25 percent housing set 2 aside, but after additional discussion, HCD agreed that the requirement for affordable housing could be achieved through consolidation by building one affordable housing development on Lot 2 (see Attachment B). While Lot 2 will include affordable units, Lot 1 will include most of the community amenities of commercial uses, plazas and open spaces, thereby mitigating the displacement of open space at Perlman Park.

During th e past two years, Downtown Permits were approved for other projects in downtown, including Heritage Walk Lofts (former Fallas/Mervyn’s), Alvin Newton Apartments (Lot 3), and Cook Street Apartments. The construction plans for Heritage Walk Lofts are current ly in review by the City, while the construction plans for Alvin Newton Apartments are currently being drafted for submittal to the City later this year.

Both projects could break ground later in 2024.

DISCUSSION:

City staff invites comments on the overall project design and for the drawings drafted for Lot 1 and Lot 2. As mentioned, Lot 3 includes the previously approved project of Alvin Newton Apartments. Lot 4 is considered as a future option after progress on Lots 1, 2, and 3. The overall project des ign also includes new parking spaces, but at a reduced count, compared to what is typically required in the City’s development standards. The Downtown Specific Plan allows for reduced parking if the project is located within close proximity to the City’s e xisting parking garages located at Town Center. The City also recognizes the necessary tradeoffs for achieving the stated downtown vision of a pedestrian-friendly city center. This tradeoff includes the addition of housing, commercial uses, and gathering s paces in exchange for land and spaces that would otherwise be used for creating parking spaces. The development proposal incorporates an approach that maximizes the value and potential of a limited infill land area.

Staff is working with the Vernon Group on finishing the draft sales and disposition agreement to include the four City -owned parcels. This agreement will include project descriptions, design expectations, affordability components, and performance measures for completion. This agreement will be presented to the City Council for action at a future meeting.

Attachment:

Attachment A: Overall Site Map
Attachment B: Lot 2 Plans
3 4
2 4
a2

TOWN CENTER

PLACEMAKING

AMENITIES
overall site plan

EXISTING BUILDING
(maya restaurant)

EXISTING

BUILDING

SPANISH
STEPS

EXISTING
parking
structure

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

HERITAGE WALK
Lobby/Amenity
Commercial Space
Flex Space
Vertical Circulation
1 EXISTING

BUILDING
S. BROADWAY
E. MAIN STREET
67 5
lincoln street
church street
town center
plaza
town center
plaza
1 2
5 3
6 4
7 LOT 1
LOT 2 - Affordable
LOT 3 - Alvin Newton Apts.

LOT 4
The Lofts
Boot Barn
222 W Main St

EXISTING BRIDGE CONNECTION
Attachment A
4 4
1 2
5 3
6 4
7 LOT 1
LOT 2 - Affordable
LOT 3 - Alvin Newton Apts.

LOT 4
The Lofts
Boot Barn
222 W Main St
2 3
6 S. BROADWAY
5 1
town center
plaza
lot 1
podium
level
podium
level
public
courtyard
Public Lot Imp.

Private Lot Imp.

Building Area
216,500

25,900

229,600

46%

5%

49%
a3

TOWN CENTER

PLACEMAKING

AMENITIES

W. MAIN STREET
improvements area
lincoln street
heritage walk
7 church street
public
courtyard
1 EXISTING BRIDGE CONNECTION
spanish
steps
public
courtyard
Date01-30-2024
Job No.

Scale
2023-0592
Date
Job No.

Scale
100 N BROADWAY
Santa Maria, CA
Conceptual 3D ViewAX.X
1" = 20'
20'40'60' 080'
Southwest Corner - E. Main Street and N. Broadway
Attachment B
Date01-30-2024
Job No.

Scale
2023-0592
Date
Job No.

Scale
100 N BROADWAY
Santa Maria, CA
Conceptual 3D ViewAX.X
1" = 20'
20'40'60' 080'
South Elevation - E. Main Street
8'-1"
10'-2"
9'-6"
8'-2"
8'-1"
7'-10"
7'-7"
10'-2"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
UP
DN
BOILER
ROOM

LEASING
OFFICE

PARKING
ENTRY5 STORY OVER 1 LEVEL OF PODIUM
±76 STALLS
MAIL

ELECTRICAL

ROOM ELEV
ROOM

STORAGE
STRG.

TRASH

COLLECTION
ELEV
ROOM

MAINTENANCE
ROOM
MPOE
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"

PASSAGEWAY
6'-6"
150'-0"
77'-7"
75'-11"
5' DIA.
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"
###
0 000
10'-0" x 20'-0"

N BROADWAY

E MAIN STREET

PROJECT DATA
LOCATION:100 N. BROADWAY
SANTA MARIA, CA 93454
EXISTING USE: PARK
5-STORY RESIDENTIAL OVER 1 LEVEL OF RAISED PODIUM
SITE AREA: ± 1.2 ACRE
DENSITY: ± 125.8 DU/AC
OVERALL FAR:± 3.84
TOTAL UNIT COUNT: ± 151 UNITS
STUDIOS:± 15 UNITS (10%)
1-BDRM:± 54 UNITS (36%)
2-BDRM:± 37 UNITS (25%)
± 1 UNIT (MANAGER'S
UNIT)
3-BDRM:± 43 UNITS (29%)
± 1 UNIT (MANAGER'S
UNIT)
PARKING PROVIDED : ± 76 STALLS
PARKING RATIO :0.5 STALLS/DU
RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA:± 159,288 SF
NON-RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA*: ± 41,400 SF
TOTAL FLOOR AREA:± 200,688 SF
*NON-RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA INCLUDES PODIUM
PARKING, MAIL ROOM, AND LEASING OFFICE.

Date01-30-2024
Job No.

Scale
2023-0592
Date
Job No.

Scale
100 N BROADWAY
Santa Maria, CA
Conceptual Site PlanA1.0
1" = 20'
20' 40'60' 080'
NORTH

PROJECT

LOCATION

E MAIN STREET

N BROADWAY
HWY
101
VICINITY MAP (N.T.S.)
NORTH
5' DIA.
48'-10"
71'-8"
61'-5"
42'-5"
8'-1"
13'-10"
16'-6"
6'-2"
7'-1"
6'-0"
7'-6"
6'-0"
11'-10"
11'-1"
6'-6"

E MAIN STREET

N BROADWAY
A2 B1
A2
A2
A2

COURTYARD
A2
A1
A1
B1

COURTYARD

LAUNDRY
A1
C1
S1 S1
C1
B1

PASSAGEWAY
C2
C2

PASSAGEWAY
A1
B1
C2
A2
A1
JAN
S1
C2 C2
B1
C1
B1
C1
B1

AMENITIES
B1

AMENITIES
Date01-30-2024
Job No.

Scale
2023-0592
Date
Job No.

Scale
100 N BROADWAY
Santa Maria, CA
Conceptual
Typical Upper Plan
A1.1
1" = 20'
20'40'60' 080'
NORTH

PROJECT

LOCATION

E MAIN STREET

N BROADWAY
HWY
101
VICINITY MAP (N.T.S.)
NORTH

PROJECT DATA
LOCATION:100 N. BROADWAY
SANTA MARIA, CA 93454
EXISTING USE: PARK
5-STORY RESIDENTIAL OVER 1 LEVEL OF RAISED PODIUM
SITE AREA: ± 1.2 ACRE
DENSITY: ± 125.8 DU/AC
OVERALL FAR:± 3.84
TOTAL UNIT COUNT: ± 151 UNITS
STUDIOS:± 15 UNITS (10%)
1-BDRM:± 54 UNITS (36%)
2-BDRM:± 37 UNITS (25%)
± 1 UNIT (MANAGER'S
UNIT)
3-BDRM:± 43 UNITS (29%)
± 1 UNIT (MANAGER'S
UNIT)
PARKING PROVIDED : ± 76 STALLS
PARKING RATIO :0.5 STALLS/DU
RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA:± 159,288 SF
NON-RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA*: ± 41,400 SF
TOTAL FLOOR AREA:± 200,688 SF
*NON-RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA INCLUDES PODIUM
PARKING, MAIL ROOM, AND LEASING OFFICE.

LEVEL 1
(+0")
13'-2" 10'-11" 10'-11" 10'-11" 10'-11"
LEVEL 2
(+13'-2")
LEVEL 3
(+24'-1")
LEVEL 4
(+35'-0")
LEVEL 5
(+45'-11")
T.O. ROOF
(+67'-9")
78'-6"
AVG. PARAPET
(+71'-9")
4'-0"
T.O. STAIR
(+78'-6")
10'-11" LEVEL 5
(+56'-10")
10 6126617 1513 91 95
LEVEL 1
(+0")
13'-2" 10'-11" 10'-11" 10'-11" 10'-11"
LEVEL 2
(+13'-2")
LEVEL 3
(+24'-1")
LEVEL 4
(+35'-0")
LEVEL 5
(+45'-11")
T.O. ROOF
(+67'-9")
78'-6"
AVG. PARAPET
(+71'-9")
4'-0"
T.O. STAIR
(+78'-6")
10'-11" LEVEL 5
(+56'-10")
10 361287107 1143 15 9 3
LEVEL 1
(+0")
13'-2" 10'-11" 10'-11" 10'-11" 10'-11"
LEVEL 2
(+13'-2")
LEVEL 3
(+24'-1")
LEVEL 4
(+35'-0")
LEVEL 5
(+45'-11")
T.O. ROOF
(+67'-9")
78'-6"
AVG. PARAPET
(+71'-9")
4'-0"
T.O. STAIR
(+78'-6")
10'-11" LEVEL 5
(+56'-10")
8 9632797 10235 51 110 1
LEVEL 1
(+0")
13'-2" 10'-11" 10'-11" 10'-11" 10'-11"
LEVEL 2
(+13'-2")
LEVEL 3
(+24'-1")
LEVEL 4
(+35'-0")
LEVEL 5
(+45'-11")
T.O. ROOF
(+67'-9")
78'-6"
AVG. PARAPET
(+71'-9")
4'-0"
T.O. STAIR
(+78'-6")
10'-11" LEVEL 5
(+56'-10")
9 611691165 51 15 5
1STUCCO - SAND FINISH
2STOREFRONT
3METAL RAILING
4WOOD RAILING
5ARCHITECTURAL TRIM
6VINYL WINDOWS
7CERAMIC TILE
8METAL AWNING
9ROOF TILE
10MURAL (TBD)
Date01-30-2024
Job No.

Scale
2023-0592
Date
Job No.

Scale
100 N BROADWAY
Santa Maria, CA
Conceptual
Building Elevations
A2.0
1" = 20'

1. South Elevation - Main St
20' 40'60' 080'

KEY MAP

MAIN STREET

N BROADWAY

BUILDING

2. East Elevation
1 2
3 4

3. North Elevation

4. West Elevation - Broadway
LEGEND
FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada

BY: Interim Finance Director Xenia Bradford

SUBJECT: Review of the Financial Report for the Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024, and Adoption of Resolutions Approving Third Quarter Amendments to the 2023-24 Budget

Description:

The City Council will receive and file the 2023-24 Third Quarter Financial Report and consider the adoption of a Resolution approving amendments to the 2023-24 budget.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. Receive and file the Financial Report for the Third Quarter ending March 31, 2024; and

2. Adopt a Resolution approving Third Quarter amendments to the 2023 -24 Budget for personnel and operational changes.

BACKGROUND:

Four times each year, City staff completes a comprehensive analysis of City finances, including projected fund balances, revenues to date, departmental expenditures, encumbrances, and potential adjustments. This financial report summarizes the Third Quarter financial analysis.

Additionally, as part of the City’s budget process, staff presents to the City Council various operational changes in conjunction with the quarterly financial report.

DISCUSSION:

The Quarterly Financial Report for the Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024 (Attachment A) provides an overview of the current economic outlook at the State and National levels; General Fund revenues, expenditures, projected fund balances; Measure U activity; and activity in the three Enterprise Funds. Though this information is not audited and does not 2 contain all the usual year-end adjustments, accruals, or disclosures, the information does provide a general picture of the City’s activity and the developing financial trends.

The Proposed Budget Amen dments (Attachment B) discuss the budget amendment requests for incorporation into the 2023-24 Budget.

Alternative(s)
A decision not to approve the budget amendments is an alternative to this recommendation. However, doing so will limit the ability to maintain required operational services.

Fiscal Considerations
If approved, the total fiscal impact of the proposed budget adjustments through the remainder of F iscal Year 2023-24 is $100,000 for the one -time equipment purchase allocation. In addition, there will be an ongoing annual cost for the Confidential Technician position of $97,700 per year. Both expenditures are funded by the General Fund.

Impact to the Community
The interim financial statement provides the community with an understanding of the financial activity of the City’s primary funds. The requested budget amendments will enable staff to maintain operations.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Quarterly Financial Report Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024

Quarterly Financial Report: Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024 1 QUARTERLY

FINANCIAL
REPORT

THIRD QUARTER ENDING
MARCH 31, 2024

ATTACHMENT A

1 MAYOR
Alice Patino

MAYOR PRO TEM
Gloria Soto

COUNCIL
Carlos Escobedo
Maribel Aguilera-Hernandez
Mike Cordero

INTERIM CITY MANAGER
Alex Posada

REPORT PREPARED BY
Xenia Bradford
Interim Director of Finance
206 East Cook Street
Santa Maria, CA 93454
(805)925-0951 Ext. 2215
www.cityofsantamaria.org

QUARTERLY

FINANCIAL
REPORT

CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CA
V

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ECONOMIC INDICATORS ................................................... 1 GENERAL FUND ................................................................ 2 MEASURE U FUND ............................................................. 5 ENTERPRISE FUNDS ............................................................ 6

WATER/WASTEWATER FUND

SOLID WASTE FUNDS

PUBLIC TRANSIT FUNDS
FY 2024-26 BIENNIAL BUDGET DEVELOPMENT ..................... 7 FUND BALANCE ................................................................ 8

GENERAL FUND

MEASURE U FUND
Quarterly Financial Report: Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024

1 ECONOMIC INDICATORS
Nationally, economic growth slowed to 1.6 percent in the first three months of the year, following robust growth of 4.9 and 3.4 percent in the third and fourth quarters of 2023. There was a sharp increase in imports and a slowdown in government spending. Consumer spending grew a solid 2.5 percent in the first quarter. Inflation is hotter than expected, up th ree months in a row. Gasoline, insurance, and rent are among the top culprits. Inflation has surged again, according to the March consumer price index report. Overall prices for everyday goods increased 3.5 percent from a year ago.

Gas prices are climbing, which they do in the spring. The national average in mid-April climbed to $3.56 per gallon. The average in California was $5.45, and it was $5.58 in Santa Barbara County. Insurers have been hiking premiums, and refusing to renew policies, to offset their rising costs due to extreme weather and the higher cost of new cars.

The US economy added 303,000 jobs in March, higher than the average monthly gain of 231,000 over the prior 12 months. The unemployment rate changed little at 3.8 percent. Job gains occurred in health care, government, and construction. The jobless rate has been in a narrow range of 3.7 to 3.9 percent since August 2023. One big reason why the labor market continues to defy expectations is the result of a surge in immigration over the past year. That population boom is supporting thousands more jobs that otherwise would not be sustainable, according to a recent report from the Brookings Institution. At the same time, it has not caused there to be fewer jobs available.

California’s unemployment rate of 5.3 percent in February was the highest in the nation. This is the first year since 1994 the state ranked last in the nation for job growth on a percentage point basis. California has large numbers of workers in businesses with big seasonal swings – hospitality, agriculture, and retail.

Other economically volatile industries, major employ ers in California, include technology, real estate, and entertainment.

California’s job market expansion turned 46 months old in February, according to the Employment Development Department which reported a gain of 3 million jobs since the pre-pandemic peak in February 2020.

California-based fast-food workers for chains with 60 or more locations around the nation now earn at least $20 an hour beginning in April, $4 higher than the overall State minimum wage of $16 that took effect January 1st. This affects about half a million workers. The objective is to elevate the standard and ensure that workers are better equipped financially to meet their household expenses.

The State budget outlook continues to evolve as va rious tax payments came in significantly weaker than expected and economic headwinds slow re venues. In mid-April the Legislature reduced spending by about $17 billion. The true size of the deficit has been difficult to pin down. In January, Governor Newsom insisted it was about $38 billion. Th e nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office said it was actually $58 billion because Newsom did not include some reductions in public education spending. Then in February – after State revenues continued to come in below expectations – the LAO revised its estimate to as much as $73 billion. Th e governor will announce an updated deficit number in May – in the “May Revise” after Californians have filed their tax returns and officials have a better idea of revenues.

People want to live in Santa Maria. The local home market remains strong, according to the Santa Maria Association of Realtors. The sale to list price ratio was at or even a couple percent above asking price much of the past year, meaning sellers typically get asking price. Over the past year, the median selling price was consistently in the range of $550,000 to $600,000 and touched $650,00in mid-February 2024. Inventory remains constrained with fewer properties for sale now than a year ago. Homes are on Quarterly Financial Report: Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024

2 ECONOMIC INDICATORS (CONTINUED)
average staying on the market for about one or two weeks, compared to a month a couple years ago. The existing Santa Maria house median sales price in February was $675,000 up 11.6 percent from a year earlier, according to the California Association of Realtors.

Across the County, there were 132 existing home sale s in February, up 23.4 percent, according to the California Association of Realtors. The median days on the market was 12, and the median price was $976,000, up 13.5 percent from a year earlier. Statewide, February’s median home price was $806,490, up 9.7 percent from a year ago. It was the tenth time in the last 11 months that the median price was above $800,000.

California’s insurance crisis reac hed new heights in April when leading insurer State Farm General announced it will not renew 72,000 property owner po licies statewide, joining Farmers, Allstate, and other companies in either not writing or limiting new policies or tightening underwriting standards.

GENERAL FUND
Current Budget
The current fiscal year General Fund appropriations as of the third quarter are $94.5 million compared to budgeted sources of $91.3 million, which includ es $2.02 million draw from the Local Economic Augmentation Fund (LEAF). At the end of FY 2022- 23 there were several projects, contracts, and transactions that were not yet completed. The re maining appropriations for those have been carried forward into FY 2023-24. A discussion of the chan ges in each category follows in the “Revenue Variances” and “Expenditure” sections of this report.

Year-Over-Year Comparison
The chart below compares revenue receipts, expenditures, and transfers for the third quarter ending March 31, 2024, versus the third quarter ending March 31, 2023.

KEY STATISTICS

Quarterly Financial Report: Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024

3 GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED)
Major Revenues
Through the third quarter, revenue receipts are at 63. 2 percent of projections. Receipts from the four major General Fund revenue sources (Sales tax, Proper ty tax, Hotel Tax, Licenses, Permits, & Fees), as shown in the top chart on the right, account fo r approximately 74 percent of total General Fund revenues. Revenues are less than the third quarter rece ipts from prior year primarily due to sales tax and hotel tax relative declines reflecting cons umers’ concern about the economy. Additionally, community development fees for services show a decline compared to prior year.

Expenditures
Through the third quarter,
expenditures are at 67.2 percent of
total budget. The Expenditures
chart to the right presents shows
that each type of operating cost is
trending within budget. Staffing is
under budget by 6.7 percent
through the third quarter, due to
vacancies mostly experienced in
the Police Department.

Recruitment of lateral and entry
positions will continue to be the
Department’s focus to fill 30
vacancies. Contracts & Services is
under budget by 17.4 percent, or
$2.2 million due to timing of the
General Plan Update project,
which will be carried forward into
the next year. Capital Outlay is under budget by 17. 5 percent, or $119,300, due to the timing of some planned capital purchases for the Fire Department.

Revenue Variances
Property Tax is the only key revenue experiencing an increase over last year. Here are the highlights of what is driving the variances in these individual revenue sources received through the third quarter.

Key variances include:
 Property Tax: The bulk of these payments are received through Santa Barbara County in December, January, April, and May of each year . Property Tax received is 7.5 percent, or $988,600, more than last fiscal year.
 Sales Tax: Receipts are 5.8 percent, or $1.4 million, less than last year. With concerns about the economy still looming, consumers
continue to reduce spending in the
categories of general consumer
goods in discount stores, home
furnishings, and electronics, as well
as autos-transportation because of

Quarterly Financial Report: Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024

4 GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED)
the challenges posed by elevated Auto prices, escalating financing expenses, and diminished access to credit.
 Hotel/Bed Tax: Through March, Transient Occupa ncy Tax (TOT) receipts are 7.2 percent, or $200,000, less than last fiscal year and behind es timates by 14.5 percent, or $620,900. The year- over-year decline is reflective of broader travel options opening up post-pandemic.  Licenses, Permits, & Fees: Revenue of $2.8 m illion exceeds projections by 14.7 percent, or $456,700, but is 10.5 percent, or $325,700, less than first nine months of FY 2022-23. This year’s revenue has included the issuance of 1,919 building permits including 19 permits for the Skyview Estates single family residential neighborhood, wh ich is planned for the construction of 58 new single-family homes on Santa Maria Way, a new veterinary clinic located on Miller Street, and 331 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). This is a slight decline compared to the first nine months of FY 2022-23, which included the issuance of 1,950 building permits; however, permit activity has continued to exceed projections due to ADU permit applications and overall development activity in Santa Maria.

Expenditures
For the third quarter, ending March 31, 2024, operating expenditures are 67.2 percent of total budget.

The chart below presents the percentage of expenditures by department:

Key variances include:
 Community Development: Under budget by 17.7 pe rcent, or $1.2 million, is primarily due to timing of expenditures for contractual servic es. The contract for the General Plan Update extended into the current fiscal year and will be carried forward into the next fiscal year as the work continues.

Sales in various retail sectors, including family apparel, electronics, and appliances, declined as consumer spending shifted towards travel and entertainment. The downturn extended to business-industrial returns, paralleling the contraction of the US Purchasing Manufacturing Index from November 2022 through November 2023, indicating a nationwide d e c r e a s e i n i n d u s t r i a l a c t i v i t i e s . - HdL, the City’s sales tax consultant

Quarterly Financial Report: Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024

5 GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED)
 Fire: Under budget by 12.2 percent, or $1.5 m illion, due to vacancies and fewer mutual aid responses resulting in lower overtime costs, as well as timing of some capital purchases. Fire has recently hired multiple Firefighters and is nearing full-staffing level. A promotional recruitment to fill vacant Battalion Chief, Captain, and Engineer position is scheduled for July 2024.  Recreation & Parks: Under budget by 12.1 percent, or $1.7 million, due to vacancies in Administration, Recreation and Parks divisions, as well as timing of contractual services.  Public Works: Under budget by 9.2 percent, or $446,100, due to vacancies as well as timing of contract service agreements and operating and maintenance expenses.  Police: Under budget by 5.1 percent, or $1.9 million, due to vacant positions which have resulted in salary (and benefits) savings of $1.7 million as recruitment of lateral and entry positions continues to be a focus for the department. For reference, salary savings through December were $1.5 million. There are currently 14 Police Of ficer vacancies, which is six fewer than were vacant last quarter; however, eight trainees are poised to complete the academy.  Other General Fund Departments: The remaining General Fund departments are under budget by between 2.5 to 6.7 percent.

MEASURE U FUND
The following table shows that revenues received through March are at 74.5 percent of budget, or $20.0 million. Expenditures are 55.8 percent of budget, or $7.8 million under budget.

MEASURE U FUND

(in millions)
FY 2023-24
Budget

3Q 2024

Percent
Revenue $ 26,886 $ 20,036 74.5%

Expenses
Community Development $ 963 632 65.6%
City Manager’s Office 189 129 68.3%
Finance 3 - -
Library 1,232 851 69.0%
Recreation & Parks 3,692 2,135 57.8%
Fire 21,449 9,807 45.7%
Police 13,090 9,092 55.8%
Total Expenses $ 40,618 $ 22,646 55.8%

Most of the budget underrun, $6.3 million, is in the Fire Department and is primarily due to the timing of $9.4 million of capital projects, including the desi gn and construction of a training center, the renovation design of the Fire administration buildin g, and the purchase of a second ladder truck. The Police Department is under budget by about $725,200 due to capital purchases, including tasers and the body camera system that will be paid by usin g other available funds. Recreation & Parks is under budget by $634,200 due to vacancies in various stages of recruitment and timing of capital purchases.

Community Development is under budget by $90,700 due to Code Enforcement vacancies. The Library On February 12, the Santa Maria Fire Department started its own in-house Lateral Recruit Fire Academy with five lateral hires. This academy is put together by the Santa Maria Fire Department CADRE team.

Quarterly Financial Report: Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024

6 MEASURE U FUND (CONTINUED)
is under budget by $73,500 primarily due to timing of
capital projects.

The budget in the City Manager’s Office is for the costs associated with maintaining the City’s mass notification system database and the Public, Education, and
Government (PEG) Production Manager position, which
was restored to full-time through adoption of the 2023-24 budget. The Finance budget is for the annual
independent audit of Measure U financial activity.

Through March, Measure U expended 89 percent on
Public Safety, 6 percent on Youth Services, and 5 percent on Quality of Life.

ENTERPRISE FUNDS
The Statement of Revenues and Expenses through th e second quarter ending March 31, 2024, for the three enterprise funds, are shown in the table below.

ENTERPRISE FUNDS

(in millions)
Water /
Wastewater
Solid
Waste
Public
Transit
Revenues
Charges for Service $ 40,297 $ 25,256 $ 446
Interest Income 1,376 513 196
Other Revenue 4,616 112 10,636
Total Revenues $ 46,289 $ 25,881 $ 11,278

Expenses
Operating $ 12,006 $ 22,068 $ 4,762
Capital 2,951 2,509 6,320
State Water Payment 17,625 - -
Debt Service 3,623 - -
Total Expenses $ 36,205 $ 24,577 $ 11,082
Revenues/Expenses $ 10,084 $ 1,304 $ 196

Water/Wastewater Funds
Revenues exceeded expenditures by $10.1 million, which is $3.5 million more than last year. Revenues increased 16.0 percent, or $6.4 million, compared to the prior year due to higher revenues generated through sales of metered water. Expenses ar e $2.9 million more than last year primarily due to an increase in debt service payments as well as payments to the Central Coast Water Authority. Through the third quarter, Water and Wastewater operational expenses are under budget by 17.0 percent due to personnel savings from vacant positions and timing of maintenance and contractual agreements.

Quarterly Financial Report: Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024

7 ENTERPRISE FUNDS (CONTINUED)
Solid Waste Funds
The Solid Waste Fund reports refuse collection and disposal activities. Through the third quarter, Solid Waste revenues exceeded expenditures by $1.3 million because operational costs are under budget by 10.7 percent, or $3.7 million. Budget of $10.8 million was carried forward to 2023-24 to complete several capital projects, including $6.1 million towards development of the In tegrated Waste Management Facility at Los Flores and $2.3 million for the landfill collection gas system expansion project.

Public Transit Funds
The City operates the Santa Maria Regional Transit (SMRT) and Breeze Transit systems, which are funded by a combination of Federal grants, State transportation funds, and user fares. Fare revenue through the third quarter is approximately $446,500, which is about $22,100 more than fares earned through the third quarter of the prior year. This difference is attributed to an increase in ridership. The farebox ratio through March 31, 2024, is 9.4 percent based on fares received and operating expenses recorded to date.

FY 2024-26 BIENNIAL BUDGET
The City is currently developing the FY 2024-2 6 biennial budget. Public engagement will be encouraged at the City Council’s meetings in May and June, during which budget presentations and discussion will be conducted and feedback received. The final budget will be presented with a public hearing at the City Council meeting. Get the latest information on public meetings related to the development of the FY 2024-26 biennial bu dget by visiting the City’s website at:
https://www.cityofsantamaria.org/services/departments/city-clerk-records/agendas-reports- meeting-videos.

JUNE:

Final Proposed
budget
hearing
MAY:

Preliminary
budget
presented to
City Council
APRIL:

Preliminary
budget
updated
MAR‐APR:

Budget Team
decides on
new initiatives
FEB‐MAR:

Budget Team
reviews and
adjusts
requests
DEC‐FEB:

Depts. prepare
operating and
capital
requests
OCT‐NOV:

Baseline
budget
developed for
depts.

Quarterly Financial Report: Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024

8 FUND BALANCE
General Fund
The table below shows, with 75 percent of the ye ar complete, revenues are at 63.2 percent of projections while expenditures are at 67.2 percent of appropriations. The beginning fund balance is an estimate because the City’s annual audit is not finalized.

GENERAL FUND
(in millions) Budget 3 rd Quarter Percent
Beg. Fund Bal. $ 10,072 $ 10,072
Revenues* 91,309 57,675 63.2%
Expenditures* 94,477 63,452 67.2%
Rev/Exp $ (3,168) $ (5,777)
Avail. Bal. $ 6,904 $ 4,295
*Includes Transfers
Measure U Fund
The table below shows, with 75 percent of the ye ar complete, revenues are at 74.5 percent of projections while expenditures are at 55.8 percent of appropriations. The beginning fund balance is an estimate because the City’s annual audit is not finalized.

MEASURE U FUND
(in millions) Budget 2 nd Quarter Percent
Beg. Fund Bal. $ 17,060 $ 17,060
Revenues* 26,886 20,036 74.5%
Expenditures* 40,618 22,646 55.8%
Rev/Exp $ (13,732) $ (2,610)
Avail. Bal. $ 3,328 $ 14,450
*Includes Transfers

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL

Gloria Soto
Councilmember
District 3

Maribel
Aguilera-
Hernandez
Councilmember
District 4

Alice Patino
Mayor
At-Large

Carlos
Escobedo
Councilmember
District 1

Mike Cordero
Councilmember
District 2

City of Santa Maria, California
110 E. Cook Street
Santa Maria, CA 93454
cityofsantamaria.org

EXPLORE
the City’s budget online at
www.cityofsantamaria.org/services/departments/city-manager-s-office/city-budget

CITY OF SANTA MARIA DISTRICTS
DISTRICT 2
Mike Cordero
DISTRICT 1
Carlos Escobedo
DISTRICT 3
Gloria Soto
DISTRICT 4
Maribel Aguilera-Hernandez

ATTACHMENT B
CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED BUDGET AMENDMENTS:

CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE / GENERAL FUND

Increase allocation of 1.0 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Confidential Technician I/II position.

The City Manager’s Office seeks to add a 1.0 FTE Confidential Technician I/II position to assist the Information Technology (IT) Department with handling the procurement, deployment, disposal, and monitoring of technology assets Citywide. The IT division manages over 3,200 technology assets using an asset lifecycle replacement schedule. Approximately 535 devices and peripherals are scheduled to be replaced by the end of the fiscal year. The assets being deployed include 82 laptops, 195 desktops, 25 tablets, 101 monitors, and all the additional accessories that accompany a workstation (i.e., keyboards, mice, docking stations, carrying cases, etc.). Each item being deployed needs to be inventoried, asset -tagged, and the asset number needs to be entered into the Help Desk system and the City’s financial system, Eden.

The items being replaced need to be properly retired out of Eden and disposed of in an appropriate location. The deployment of assets is an annual assignment, with laptops and desktops having a lifecycle of five years. Assets have been placed on a staggered replacement cycle, causing an ongoing need for administrative assistance to process the replacement cycle for that year.

To recover the full cost of replacing the assets from the departments receiving the item, the item must be deployed this Fiscal Year. A delay would cause an insufficient amount to be collected within the five -year lifecycle, forcing the City to further delay the replacement of assets in the future, resu lting in City staff using out -of-date technology, potential equipment failures, and paying more for future replacements, which would result in a larger impact to the General Fund.

Should this position not be approved, City staff and officials may experie nce a delay in assistance with solving technology issues, which could in turn delay the conduct of official business. Delaying any official meeting would impact the residents of the City of Santa Maria.

A Confidential Technician I/II position will assist the analysts in this deployment allowing Information Technology staff to spend their time on the installation of the equipment. There is no fiscal impact of this addition through the remainder of Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24. The annualized fiscal impact beginning in FY 2024 -25 is estimated at $94,700 for a 1.0 FTE Confidential Technician I/II.

CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE / BUSINESS EQUIPMENT FUND

Increase appropriation by $ 100,000 to purchase a Crime Lab F ull Spectrum Imaging System (FSIS) Color Lab Camera.

The Crime Lab FSIS Color Lab Camera purchased in 2018 and anticipated to have a ten -year life is not functioning properly and is out of warranty, thereby necessitating escalation of its replacement. This equipment is used daily to triage and process items of physical evidence for latent fingerprints. The total cost to replace this asset is $100,000. $41,693 has been collected for the replacement of the asset within the Business Equipment Fund. Additional appropriations in the General Fund of $ 58,307 are available for this purchase from salary savings within the

Police Department. The Budget Amendment requests the transfer of $58,307 from the General Fund into the Business Equipment Fund, appropriation of reserves from the Business Equipment Fund in the amount of $41,693, and appropriation of $100,000 in expenditure from these two funding sources for the purchase.

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THIRD-QUARTER AMENDMENTS TO THE 2023-24 BUDGET FOR

PERSONNEL AND OPERATIONAL CHANGES

WHEREAS, certain personnel and operational issues are brought forward for the City Council’s consideration in conjunction with the quarterly financial report; and

WHEREAS, it is recommended to amend the 2023-24 budget for subsequent appropriations, actions, and costs as determined to be in the public’s best interest.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. Increase allocation of one (1) Full-Time Confidential Technician I/II position in the City Manager’s Information Technology Division, and

2. Increase expenditure appropriations by $100,000 in the Business Equipment Fund by drawing $41,693 from the Business Equipment Fund reserve and transferring $58,307 from the General Fund into the Business Equipment Fund.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 7th day of May 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Interim Department Director
_______________________________
Interim City Manager

← All documents from this meeting