Mayor Alice Patino
Mayor Pro-Tem Gloria Soto
Councilmember Mike Cordero
Councilmember Carlos Escobedo
Councilmember Maribel Aguilera-Hernandez
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA
Tuesday, May 21, 2024
REGULAR SESSION - 5:30 P.M.
Oral Comments during the meeting:
In-person format. Attend the meeting in-person in the City Hall Council Chambers at 110 East Cook Street, Santa Maria, and submit a request to speak to the Clerk or City staff. •
Zoom Meeting Portal. Participate via Zoom to register to speak during the Public Comment portion of the meeting or on a particular Agenda Item. Use the Zoom link below or dial-in via telephone.
•
Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_VWb9Lw9mR76XWEMFoIHFlg Dial Phone #: 1-669-900-9128**
Webinar ID #: 886 7506 9372
**Press *6 to un-mute your phone. Press *9 to raise your hand to speak.
Watch an instructional Video on Participating using Zoom.
Public Written Comments prior to the meeting (must be received by 2:00 p.m. in advance of the meeting*):
Email - Submit Comments via email to [email protected]. In the body of your email, please include the date of the meeting and the item number (if applicable). Emails will not be read aloud during the meeting.
•
Mail - Delivered by the U.S. Postal Service. Address letters to the City Council, Attn.: City Clerk's Office at 110 East Cook Street, Santa Maria, CA 93454. Letters will not be read aloud during the meeting.
•
*All written correspondence will be distributed to Councilmembers and attached to the associated meeting agenda (under Public Comment or Agenda Item); however, submissions received after the deadline will not be processed until the following day.
How to watch the meeting from home:
Comcast Channel 23 - Live during the meeting, and rebroadcast on Thursday at 9:00 a.m. after the meeting and again on Tuesday at 5:30 p.m. the following week.
1. Live Webcast - Online from the Agenda Center & Meetings Portal (select meeting date) or at https://video.isilive.ca/santamaria/live.html . Note - When no meeting is streaming, the window will read "Searching for live stream."
2. You Tube Live Stream - You Tube Webcast.
Note: Live Webcast and You Tube Live are typically available within 15 minutes before the start of the meeting. There is a delay of about 15-30 seconds with both the Live Webcast and You Tube Live Stream.
3. Zoom Meeting Portal - Registration is required (link above) even for observing the meeting.4.
American Disability Act Accommodations:
Any member of the public who needs accommodations should email the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected] or call 805-925-0951 x2306. The City Clerk’s Office will use its best efforts to provide reasonable accommodation by request at least 48 hours ahead of the meeting.
1.INVOCATION
2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3.CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez, Councilmember Cordero, Councilmember Escobedo, Councilmember Soto, and Mayor Patino
4.PROCLAMATIONS
4.a Proclamation – “National Public Works Week” – May 19 through May 25, 2024 Present a Proclamation to recognize May 19 through 25, 2024, as “National Public Works Week” in the City of Santa Maria.
5.PRESENTATIONS
5.a Pavement Management Update 2024
The City Council will receive a presentation on City roadway condition and maintenance programs.
Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.
5.b Santa Maria Community Television
The City Council will receive a presentation about Santa Maria Community Television.
6.PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (Not to exceed 15 Minutes)
The City Council values your input. Instructions are provided above (page 1) for communicating with the City Council. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes or as directed by the Mayor.
7.CONSENT CALENDAR
The following routine items are presented for City Council approval without discussion as a single agenda item in order to expedite the meeting. The Consent Calendar is approved by roll call vote with one motion. These items are discussed only on request of Councilmembers. Members of the public may speak on Consent Calendar items during the Public Comment Period.
SHOULD A COUNCILMEMBER WISH TO DISCUSS OR DISAPPROVE ANY ITEM, it must be dropped from the blanket motion of approval and considered as a separate item.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Consent Calendar as submitted.
7.a CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT
7.a.1 Ordinances and Resolutions
RECOMMENDATION:
Waive the reading in full of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Ordinances on the Consent Agenda will be adopted by the same vote cast at the first meeting, unless City Council indicates otherwise.
7.a.2 Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Minutes of the special City Council meeting of May 6, 2024, and regular City Council meeting of May 7, 2024.
7.a.3 Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Comprehensive Schematic Pay Schedule for Full-Time and Part-Time Employees in Compliance with the Requirements of California Public Employees’ Retirement System The City Council will consider approving the single Comprehensive Schematic Pay Schedule in compliance with the requirements of California Public Employees’ Retirement System to incorporate the addition of the Electrician I/II Flex Series classification.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution approving a Comprehensive Schematic Pay Schedule for all full-time and part-time employees in accordance with California Public Employees’ Retirement System guidelines.
7.a.4 Bond Release for Carpenter’s Local 1800, Tract 6016 The City Council will consider authorizing the bond release for Carpenter’s Local 1800, Tract 6016.
Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.
RECOMMENDATION:
By motion, accept as complete the public improvements associated with Carpenter’s Local 1800, Tract 6016, and authorize the release of Faithful Performance Bond [#36K000069] in the full amount of $136,910 posted in the
form of a Surety to guarantee the construction and installation of public improvements off-site; and order that the Labor and Material Bond in the amount of $68,455 and the Guarantee and Defective Material bond in the amount of $13,691, and Tree Bond [#36K000070] in the amount of $4,125 be retained for six months, one year, and one year, respectively, from the date of the release of the Faithful Performance Bond for public improvements.
7.b FINANCE DEPARTMENT
7.b.1 Payment of Warrants
RECOMMENDATION:
Order ratified subject to having been certified as being in conformity with the budget and having been approved for payment by the Director of Finance.
7.b.2 Payment of Payroll
RECOMMENDATION:
Order ratified subject to having been certified by the proper Department Directors, as shown on records on file in the Department of Finance, and having been approved for payment by the Director of Finance.
7.c PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
7.c.1 Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Project List For Senate Bill 1
The City Council will consider approving a Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Project List for Fiscal Year 2024-2025.
Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution approving a Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Project List to be funded by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, Senate Bill 1, and incorporated into the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 budget.
7.d RECREATION & PARKS DEPARTMENT
7.d.1 Adoption of Resolutions Approving the Engineer’s Reports and Intent to Levy and Collect the 2024 – 2025 Landscape Assessments
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution approving the engineer’s reports for the 2024-25 landscape maintenance districts and special benefit zones assessment proceedings; and
1. Adopt a Resolution declaring its intention to levy and collect landscape maintenance assessments for fiscal year 2024-25 and setting a time and place for a public hearing for June 4, 2024 to consider the proposed assessments for the landscape maintenance districts and the 19 special benefit zones.
2.
8.REGULAR BUSINESS
ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS FOR REGULAR BUSINESS ITEMS:
Council Agenda Report to be given.
Questions from the City Council.
Written communications/Public input.
City Council discussion and action.
8.a Preliminary Fiscal Year 2024-26 Budget Development
The City Council will receive an update on the Fiscal Year 2024-26 Budget Development; provide input on its development, including a General Fund and Measure U overview; and provide input on preliminary budget proposals.
Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Receive and provide input on the Preliminary Budget and fund analysis; and 2) Receive and provide input on the preliminary budget proposals of City departments; and
3) Receive and provide input on the proposed financial policies changes; and 4) Receive and provide input on the proposed fee increases and direct staff to return with the fee update for adoption on June 18, 2024, and
5) Set a public hearing date for adoption of the proposed Fiscal Year 2024-26 Biennial Budget on June 18, 2024.
9.REPORT BY INTERIM CITY MANAGER
10.ORAL REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS AND OFFICERS (INCLUDING AB1234
REPORTS)
11.ADJOURNMENT
PLEASE NOTE:
The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on June 4, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. The deadline for submitting items for the June 4th meeting is May 22nd.
City Council Meetings are televised live on Comcast cable television channel 23 and are rebroadcast at 9:00 a.m. on the next Thursday and on the following Tuesday at 5:30 p.m.
Council Meeting videos are also available for viewing on the City’s website. Your attendance at this public meeting may result in the recording and broadcast of your image and/or voice.
If you challenge a determination made on a matter on this agenda in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described on this agenda, or in written correspondence to the city council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION AND PROCESS:
This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2. By listing a topic on this agenda, the City Council has expressed its intent to discuss and act on each item. In addition to any action identified in the summary description of each item, the action that may be taken by the City Council shall include: a referral to staff with specific requests for information; continuance; specific direction to staff concerning the policy or mission of the item; discontinuance of consideration; authorization to enter into negotiations and execute agreements pertaining to the item; adoption or approval; and disapproval. Items not on the agenda may not be discussed or acted upon except under emergency circumstances. (Government Code Section 54954.2).
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the agenda are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and available for public inspection during City Hall business hours the Friday before the meeting. Any written correspondence or documents provided to a majority of the City Council after distribution of the Agenda will also be available for public inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. If requested, the agenda and supporting documents shall be made available in alternative formats to persons with a disability. The City Clerk’s Office will answer any questions regarding the agenda.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted after distribution of the agenda packet will also be available with the agenda material for public inspection during normal business hours in the City Clerk’s Office, 110 E. Cook Street, Santa Maria. Subject to the ability to post the documents prior to the meeting, such documents will also be available on the City’s m e e t i n g s w e b s i t e p o r t a l f o r t h e c u r r e n t C i t y C o u n c i l m e e t i n g a t https://cityofsantamaria.org/meetings .
The City of Santa Maria welcomes orderly participation at its meetings from all members of the public. Orderly participation means speaking only on items of City business or on subjects within the City’s control. Though the City Council wants to hear your concerns and values your input, it is inappropriate to defame, yell, use profane language, interrupt, or disrupt the meeting. All cellular telephones are to be turned off or set to vibrate, and signs are not to be displayed in a manner that violates the rights of others or prevents others from watching or fully participating in the Council meeting. Pursuant to Government Code Section 36813, the Mayor is authorized to prohibit such conduct, up to and including ordering anyone that disrupts the meeting to be removed from the City Council Chambers.
To receive reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act during the meeting, please notify the City Clerk’s office of your needs during business hours at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting (typically before 3 p.m. on the Thursday before the meeting). The Office of the City Clerk is located at 110 East Cook Street in Santa Maria; telephone (805) 925-0951, extension 2306. The City will give primary consideration to your request in providing assistance. Examples of assistance may include exhibits in large-sized format, use of assisted listening equipment, use of the California Relay Service, texting by cellular phone, or the services of a live interpreter.
Assisted listening equipment can also be used for interpretation by Spanish-only speaking persons. To allow the City to coordinate and request a Spanish interpreter from the volunteer corps, contact the Office of the City Clerk by 1:00 p.m. on Monday before the meeting.
Equipo también puede ser utilizado para la asistencia de interpretación para esas personas que solamente hablan español. Para permitirle a la Ciudad que coordine y solicite un
interprete de un grupo de voluntarios, llame al (805) 925-0951 extensión 2307 a la 1:00 de la tarde el lunes antes de la junta.
FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 21, 2024
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada
BY: Director of Public Works Brett Fulgoni
SUBJECT: Proclamation – “National Public Works Week” – May 19 through May 25, 2024
Present a Proclamation to recognize May 19 through 25, 2024, as “National Public Works Week” in the City of Santa Maria.
BACKGROUND:
President John F. Kennedy proclaimed “National Public Works Week” as an annual reminder of the many ways public works contribute to the quality of life. Public Works professionals include those who maintain and improve the systems and services vital to a community’s health, safety, and comfort. In Santa Maria, the Public Works and Utilities Departments provide the production and delivery of clean water; wastewater collection and treatment; stormwater collection, treatment, and control, solid waste collection and disposal, streets and highways, public transit, public buildings, and fleet services.
For many years, public works professionals across North America have applauded and shared the accomplishments of those in their profession. During this celebration, professionals take part in events and activities to increase pu blic awareness of, and appreciation for, the public works profession.
DISCUSSION:
The American Public Works Association (APWA) sponsors “National Public Works Week,” which is being observed this year from May 19 th through 25th, 2024. Since public works projects are vital to the growth and quality of life in any community, this year's theme “Advancing Quality of Life for All," promotes the efforts of public works professionals. The City of Santa Maria is a charter member of the Central Coast Chapter of the APWA. The Santa Maria City Council has long supported the public works profession.
Attachment: Proclamation
City of Santa Maria
Santa Maria, California
Proclamation
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Maria has supported the role of the Public Works and Utilities Departments to provide vital services to the community which are an integral part of the City’s residents’ everyday lives; and
WHEREAS, the support of an informed community is vital to the operation of public works systems and programs, such as the production and delivery of clean water; wastewater collection and treatment; stormwater collection, treatment, and control; solid waste collection and disposal; streets and highways; public transit; public buildings; and fleet services; and
WHEREAS, the health, safety, and comfort of the community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and
WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these services and facilities, as well as their planning, design, and construction are vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill s of public works officials; and
WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff the Public Works and Utilities Departments is materially influenced by the residents’ attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform; and
NOW, THEREFORE, I, ALICE M. PATINO, Mayor of the City of Santa Maria, hereby recognize the week of May 19 through 25, 2024, as:
“NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK”
in the City of Santa Maria and call upon all residents and civic organizations to recognize the contributions public works officials make every day for better health, safety, and quality of life.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and have caused the Seal of the City of Santa Maria to be affixed hereto this 21st day of May 2024.
_____________________________________
Alice M. Patino, Mayor
FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 21, 2024
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada
BY: Director of Public Works Brett Fulgoni
SUBJECT: Pavement Management Update 2024
Description:
The City Council will receive a presentation on City roadway condition and maintenance programs.
Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council will receive a presentation from Public Works Engineering staff on pavement management and the City’s Pavement Condition Index (PCI), roadway treatment strategy, budget, and financial needs. Staff will also review various standards, policies, and procedures used to extend the useful life of the City infrastructure and make the most effective use of available funding.
There are 230 centerline miles (533 lane miles) (1.9 square miles) of asphalt concrete roadways in the City limits valued at over $1 billion in replacement cost. The current overall PCI for the City is 69, which is “At-Risk” on a scale of 0-100. Annual expenditures on pavement preservation do not meet the level needed to maintain pavement condition.
Staff estimates the current overall PCI rating will drop by approximately one point per year. This drop in the City’s PCI rating will accelerate as costs compound exponentially each year.
DISCUSSION:
The City receives funding from various sources for pavement preservation. Senate Bill 1 (SB-1) Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Gas Tax, along with Gas Tax Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA), Measure A, Local Surface Transportation Program (LSTP), and General Fund combined provide the City approximately $7 million a year to use on pavement projects. Even with these significant funding sources, the needs analysis generated by the City’s pavement management system shows, that with updated cost models, there is a funding shortfall of $4 million annually to keep the PCI constant without further decline.
2 To increase the PCI by one point per year, the City will require an additional $13 million annually. Therefore, over the next five years to achieve a PCI of 75, the City will require $10 million annually.
Staff recommends the continued use of a multi-prong approach to address the issue.
Innovation, standard updates, and development conditions will all be used to help mitigate the funding shortfall.
Innovation
The City has been exploring innovative ways to maximize funding dollars for pavement maintenance to utilize funding in the most cost -effective manner. In Fiscal Year 24/25, Engineering, in coordination with Streets Staff, will utilize an on -call contractor to focus on the maintenance of primary and secondary arterials. These types of roadways carry the highest volumes of traffic in the City. In general, the roadways exhibit a sa tisfactory level of overall health. Therefore, proposed maintenance will be location specific. This strategy will raise the overall integrity of the roadway, extend its useful life, and raise the arterial PCI.
With a contractor focusing on the more heavily travelled roadways, City’s Street Staff will address distressed collectors and local residential roadways segments. This strategy will increase staff productivity, increase pavement maintenance areas, and raise the residential PCI.
Our pavement management approach has “hyper focused” our efforts to only pave areas that are critical. In the example of Suey Road, which is 60’ wide, Public Works paved 24’ of the roadway. The difference in cost between paving the entire 60’ width, versus 24’ is $2,200,000 vs $800,000 respectively. This was also the strategy used on Depot Street.
The City is looking at other roadways such as North College. Roadways with relatively low traffic volumes are candidates for “diets” reducing a roadway from four lanes to two lanes. This strategy reduces speeds, improves pedestrian, car, and bike safety, and substantially reduces our cost to maintain.
Fiscal Considerations
No fiscal considerations. The pavement management update provides the City Council a status of City’s roadway PCI and overview of Staff’s plan for roadway maintenance for fiscal year 24/25. The City Council may receive the update and provide guidance for future consideration.
Impact to the Community
The pavement management update proposes to provide insight to th e residents of the City of Santa Maria regarding Staff’s approach to pavement maintenance; strategies utilized to expend public funds in the most cost -effective and efficient way possible.
FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 21, 2024
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada
SUBJECT: Santa Maria Community Television
The City Council will receive a presentation about Santa Maria Community Television.
BACKGROUND:
Thousands of hours of original videos made by the community and the City have been viewed on the City’s three public access television channels and via web streaming since the City launched television operations nearly 20 years ago. Staff’s presentation highlights just some of the work already undertaken and the efforts that are underway by Santa Maria Community Television (SMCTV).
DISCUSSION:
As part of its commitment to excellence in communication s internally and externally, the City Manager’s Office operates SMCTV, a Public, Education, and Government (PEG) access television offering community members, non-profit organizations, educational institutions, and the City with the tools to produce local programs for airing on three Comcast channels. The City began PEG operations in August 2004, taking over from Comcast.
SMCTV covers City Council, Planning Commission, and Recreation and Parks Commission meetings, provides audio-video production for all 10 City departments, produces content in English and Spanish, and coordinates live closed captioning (subtitles) in both languages for City public meetings across cable and digital channels.
Last year, the City upgraded its audio-visual system in the Council Chambers and the control room. The superior quality is appreciated by viewers, and we now also provide meeting coverage for the 3CE.
Channel 23, the government channel, is reserved for programming supplied by the City.
Channel 24, the educational access channel, is reserved for programming supplied by or produced by local schools, Allan Hancock College, and the City.
Channel 25 is reserved for public access — programs that originate with local residents and nonprofit organizations.
2 IMPACT TO THE COMMUNITY:
This service provides valuable public education and engagement with local government.
City videos explain in English and Spanish how and where the City departments are serving the community. City public meetings and local school board meetings are shown on Channel 23. The public makes TV programming on a wide variety of topics. This is another communication commitment the City provides to ensure meaningful access and transparency.
1 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2024, 10:00 a.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
110 East Cook Street
Santa Maria
Roll Call: Mayor Alice Patino, Councilmember Maribel Aguilera-Hernandez, Councilmember Mike Cordero, Councilmember Carlos Escobedo, Councilmember Gloria Soto
Staff Present: Interim City Manager Alex Posada, City Attorney Thomas Watson, Assistant City Clerk Alexandra Valadez
_____________________________________________________________________
CLOSED SESSION
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Patino called the meeting to order at 10:02 a.m.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Councilmembers Maribel Aguilera-Hernandez, Mike Cordero, Carlos Escobedo, Gloria Soto, and Mayor Alice Patino
Councilmember Escobedo was not present for roll call. He arrived at 10:06 a.m.
Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez was not present for roll call. She arrived at 10:08 a.m.
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
Interim City Manager Posada, City Attorney Watson, and Assistant City Clerk Valadez (for roll call only).
2. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
Mayor Patino invited public comment. Speaking from the public was Matt Chircop.
3. RECESS-CLOSED SESSION
3.a Public Employee Recruitment - City Manager, Pursuant to California Government Code §54956.8 Mayor Patino recessed to a Closed Session at 10:09 a.m.
2 4. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
Mayor Patino reconvened to open session at 11:36 a.m.
5. REPORT BY THE CITY ATTORNEY FROM CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Watson reported that direction was provided to staff to proceed with the recruitment process, with details forthcoming.
6. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Patino declared the City Council meeting adjourned at 11:38 a.m.
_________________________
Chief Deputy City Clerk
_________________________
Alice M. Patino, Mayor
1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2024, 5:30 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
110 East Cook Street
Santa Maria
Roll Call: Mayor Alice Patino, Councilmember Maribel Aguilera-Hernandez, Councilmember Mike Cordero, Councilmember Carlos Escobedo, Councilmember Gloria Soto
Staff Present: Interim City Manager Alex Posada, City Attorney Thomas Watson, Fire Chief Bradley Dandridge, Director of Public Works Brett Fulgoni, Interim Chief Human Resources Officer Dawn Jackson, Chief Information Officer Jeffrey Marecic, Interim Director of Recreation and Parks Angela Oslund, Commander Jesse Silva, Director of Utilities Shad Springer, Interim Assistant City Manager Chuen Wu, Assistant City Clerk Alexandra Valadez, Deputy City Clerk Ashley Arciniega
_____________________________________________________________________
CLOSED SESSION
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Patino called the meeting to order at 4:31 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Councilmembers Maribel Aguilera-Hernandez, Mike Cordero, Carlos Escobedo, Gloria Soto, and Mayor Alice Patino.
Councilmember Escobedo was not present for roll call; he arrived at 4:32 p.m.
Councilmember Soto was not present for roll call; she arrived at 4:35 p.m.
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
Interim City Manager Posada, City Attorney Watson, and Assistant City Clerk Valadez (for roll call only).
2. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
Mayor Patino invited public comment. Speaking from the public was Herbert Bolton, Fermin Barbosa, Jeff Lee, Cory Pascolla, Matt Chircop, and Becka Ruebsamen.
3. RECESS-CLOSED SESSION
3.a Conference with Labor Negotiators, Pursuant to California Government Code §54957.6
3.b Public Employee Recruitment - City Manager, Pursuant to California Government Code §54956.8 Mayor Patino recessed to a Closed Session at 4:51 p.m.
4. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
OPEN SESSION - 5:30 P.M.
5. INVOCATION
Pastor Daniel Cassels from Life Way Fellowship Church gave the Invocation.
6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2 Councilmember Escobedo led the Pledge of Allegiance.
7. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Patino convened the meeting and called the meeting to order at 5:38 p.m.
8. REPORT BY THE CITY ATTORNEY FROM CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Watson reported that instructions provided and direction given for items 3.a and 3.b.
9. PROCLAMATIONS
9.a Proclamation - “Water Awareness Month” - May 2024
The City Council declared the month of May 2024 as “Water Awareness Month” in the City of Santa Maria. The Proclamation was accepted by Water Conservation Specialist Myra Ritchie.
9.a.1 Presentation - Water Awareness Poster Contest Winners Water Conservation Specialist Myra Ritchie presented the 2024 Water Awareness School Poster Contest winners. This year's winners are Janice Ochoa Jaramillo, Alvin Elementary School (Most Educational); Luz Vitervo, Sanchez Elementary School (Best Celebration of Water); Dal eyza Coxcahua-Mata, Sanchez Elementary School (Most Artistic); Enrique Andrade, Rice Elementary School (Most Colorful); and Javet Lopez, Alvin Elementary School (Most Water Aware).
9.b Proclamation – “Fentanyl Awareness Day” – May 9, 2024 The City Council presented a Proclamation recognizing May 9th, 2024, as “Fentanyl Awareness Day” in the City of Santa Maria to raise awareness and prevent overdose caused by fentanyl. The Proclamation was accepted by Fighting Back Santa Maria Valley.
9.c Proclamation – “Compost Awareness Week” – May 5 through 11, 2024 The City Council presented a Proclamation recognizing May 5th through 11th, 2024, as Compost Awareness Week in the City of Santa Maria. The Proclamation was accepted by Bob Engel of Engel & Gray.
9.d Proclamation - “National Police Week” - May 12 through May 18, 2024, and “Peace Officers’ Memorial Day” – May 15, 2024.
The City Council presented a Proclamation recognizing the week of May 12 th through May 18th, 2024, as “National Police Week” and Wednesday, May 15th, 2024, be declared “Peace Officers’ Memorial Day” in the City of Santa Maria. The Proclamation was accepted by Lieutenant Daniel Rios of the Santa Maria Police Department.
9.e Proclamation – “Go Rodeo Days” – May 7 through June 2 The City Council presented a Proclamation recognizing May 7th through June 2nd, 2024, as “Go Rodeo Days” in the City of Santa Maria. The Proclamation was accepted by Scott Parsons and Peter Sterling of the Santa Maria Elks Lodge.
9.f Proclamation – “National Bike Month” – May 2024
The City Council presented a Proclamation recognizing May 2024, as “National Bike Month” in the City of Santa Maria, and encourage people to join in celebrating bicycling. The Proclamation was accepted by Aaron Bonfilio the Director of Multimodal Programs of SBCAG.
10. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (Not to exceed 15 Minutes)
Mayor Patino invited public comment. Speaking from the public was Benjamin Ortiz, Mavis Deparini, Dr. Tami Waterman, and Andy Davis.
Mayor Patino requested Interim City Manager Posada follow up with Ms. Depaini and Assistant City Manager Chuen Wu follow up with Mr. Davis.
11. CONSENT CALENDAR
3 Consent Calendar Items 11.a.1 through 11.d.6 were approved as presented, including the adoption of Resolution Nos. 2024-55, 2024-56, 2024-57, 2024-58, 2024-59, 2024-60, and 2024-61. The recorded vote appears with each item below.
Mayor Patino invited public comment. Speaking from the public was Lourdes Luna on item 11.d.6.
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Adopt the Consent Calendar as submitted.
For (5): Mayor Patino, Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez, Councilmember Cordero, Councilmember Escobedo, and Councilmember Soto
Motion carried by a recorded vote (5 to 0)
11.a CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT
11.a.1 Ordinances and Resolutions
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Waive the reading in full of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Ordinances on the Consent Agenda will be adopted by the same vote cast at the first meeting, unless City Council indicates otherwise.
Motion carried by a recorded vote
11.a.2 Approval of Minutes
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Approved the Minutes of the regular City Council meeting of April 16, 2024.
Motion carried by a recorded vote
11.a.3 Adoption of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to Santa Barbara County Association of Governments Joint Powers Agreement
Action: Adopted as Resolution No. 2024-55.
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Adopted a Resolution approving an amendment to the Joint Powers Authority Agreement for Santa Barbara County Association of Governments to add the role of coordination of broadb and activities.
Motion carried by a recorded vote
11.b COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
11.b.1 Employee Housing Resource Officer Annual Report
The City Council received, reviewed, and filed the Employee Housing Resource Officer annual report.
11.c FINANCE DEPARTMENT
11.c.1 Payment of Warrants
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
4 Order ratified subject to having been certified as being in conformity with the budget and having been approved for payment by the Director of Finance.
Motion carried by a recorded vote
11.c.2 Payment of Payroll
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Order ratified subject to having been certified by the proper Department Directors, as shown on records on file in the Department of Finance, and having been approved for payment by the Director of Finance.
Motion carried by a recorded vote
11.d PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
11.d.1 Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Establishment of Angle Parking on West Cy press Street
Action: Adopted as Resolution No. 2024-56.
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Adopted a Resolution approving the establishment of angle parking on West Cypress Street.
Motion carried by a recorded vote
11.d.2 Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Establishment of Limited -Time Parking Zone on Dal Porto Lane
Action: Adopted as Resolution No. 2024-57.
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Adopted a Resolution establishing a limited-time parking zone on Dal Porto Lane.
Motion carried by a recorded vote
11.d.3 Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Establishment of Limited-Time Parking Zone on Fairway Drive
Action: Adopted as Resolution No. 2024-58.
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Adopted a Resolution establishing a limited-time parking zone on Fairway Drive.
Motion carried by a recorded vote
11.d.4 Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Establishment of Limited-Time Parking Zone on Thompson Way
Action: Adopted as Resolution No. 2024-59.
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Adopted a Resolution establishing a limited-time parking zone on Thompson Way.
5 Motion carried by a recorded vote
11.d.5 Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Establishment of Limited Time Parking Zone on South Thornburg Street
Action: Adopted as Resolution No. 2024-60.
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Adopted a Resolution establishing a limited-time parking zone on South Thornburg Street.
Motion carried by a recorded vote
11.d.6 Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Establishment of Prefere ntial Parking Privileges in The Pacific Crest Estates Neighborhood
Action: Adopted as Resolution No. 2024-61.
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Adopted a Resolution approving the establishment of preferential pa rking privileges to vehicles displaying a valid parking permit in the Pacific Crest Estates Neighborhood bounded by the southerly Right of Way of West Battles Road, easterly Right of Way of Biscayne Street, northerly Right of Way of Sonya Lane, westerly Right of Way of Pergola Street, and the existing pedestrian path.
Motion carried by a recorded vote
12. REGULAR BUSINESS
12.a The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act The City Council considered adopting a Resolution opposing Initiative No. 21-0042A1, the “Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act”. The Presentation was given by League of California Cities' Regional Public Affairs Manager Dave Mullinax.
Action: Adopted as Resolution No. 2024-62.
Moved by: Councilmember Soto
Seconded by: Councilmember Escobedo
Adopted a Resolution opposing Ballot Initiative No 21-0042A1, the “Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act”.
For (5): Mayor Patino, Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez, Councilmember Cordero, Councilmember Escobedo, and Councilmember Soto
Motion carried by a recorded vote (5 to 0)
12.b Conceptual Review of Proposed Downtown Redevelopment by the Vernon Group on City -Owned Parcels
The City Council received a presentation from Assistant City Manager Chuen Wu and representatives from RRM Design Group and The Vernon Group. Direction was provided to staff.
One written public comment was received from Teresa Paredes of the Maya Restaurant.
Councilmember Soto left the meeting at 7:50 p.m. prior to the beginning of item 12.c.
12.c Review of the Financial Report for the Third Quarter Ending March 31, 2024, and Adoption of Resolutions Approving Third Quarter Amendments to the 2023 -24 Budget
6 The City Council received a presentation from Interim Finance Director Xenia Bradford. The Financial Report for the Third Quarter ending March 31, 2024, was received by the City Council and filed.
Mayor Patino invited public comment. Speaking from the public was Matt Chircop.
Councilmember Escobedo made a motion to approve the Resolution with an amendment to remove the Confidential Technician position in the City Manager's Office from the Resolution.
Action: Adopted as Resolution No. 2024-63
Moved by: Councilmember Escobedo
Seconded by: Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez
Adopted a Resolution approving Third Quarter amendments to the 2023 -24 Budget for personnel and operational changes, as amended.
For (4): Mayor Patino, Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez, Councilmember Cordero, and Councilmember Escobedo
Absent (1): Councilmember Soto
Motion carried by a recorded vote (4 to 0)
13. REPORT BY INTERIM CITY MANAGER
Interim City Manager Posada reported that the next City Council Meeting would be May 21st. Ite ms on the upcoming agenda would include a potential closed session, a Proclamation for Public Works Week, a Presentations regarding Santa Maria Community Television, Homeless Encampment Response, Pavement Management, a Public Safety Managers Resolution Upd ate, an Engineer's Report, and the Preliminary Budget. Items on the agenda for the City Council Meeting on June 4th would include a Proclamation for Pride Month, a Presentation for the Annual 3CE Update, a Presentation on the Waste Water Treatment Plans and Water Discharge Requirements Program Management Project, a Consent item on Elections Consolidation, Final Approval of CDBG Action Plan, Annual Report for Military Use Equipment Policy, Limited Time Parking on Airpark Drive, Storm Water Basin Policy, Park Assessment, and the Urban Forest Management Plan. Items on the agenda for the City Council Meeting on June 18th would include a Proclamation for Juneteenth, a Consent item on the 2024 Investment Policy, and a Budget Hearing. Interim City Manager Posada further recommended that the council explore the option of rescheduling the July 2nd City Council meeting.
14. ORAL REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS AND OFFICERS (INCLUDING AB1234 REPORTS) Councilmember Cordero reported that he attended the Student of the Year for the Elks Lodge.
Councilmember Escobedo reported that he attended the Santa Maria Valley Housing Summit, Let's Get Loud by CALM, 2024 Annual Strawberry Industry Appreciation Dinner, and Festival Ñuu Savi.
Councilmember Aguilera-Hernandez reported that she attended the EconAlliance Board Meeting, the Santa Maria Valley Housing Summit, the Annual Strawberry Industry Appreciation Dinner, the Women Lawyer Association, the Strawberry Festival, and the (COLAB) Coalition Labor of Agriculture and Business Event.
Councilmember Soto was not present to report.
Mayor Patino reported that she attended the SBCAG Monthly Board Meeting, the Santa Maria Valley Housing Summit, the Annual Strawberry Industry Appreciation Dinner, SERVE Santa Maria, the Space X Tour, the Mayor's Forum at Vandenberg, Santa Barbara County Economic Roundtable, Joint Cities - County Affordable Housing Task Group, the Strawberry Festival, Friends of Waller Park, the California Alliance of Local Electeds Meeting, the Mayor's Teen Council Southern Calif ornia Museums & Universities Excursion, LAFCO Meeting, the 27th Annual National Day of Prayer, Rotary Fundraiser, and West Coast Kustoms Meeting.
15. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Patino declared the City Counc il meeting adjourned at 8:18 p.m.
7 _________________________
Chief Deputy City Clerk
_________________________
Alice M. Patino, Mayor
FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 21, 2024
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada
BY: Interim Chief Human Resources Officer Dawn Jackson
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Comprehensive Schematic Pay Schedule for Full-Time and Part-Time Employees in Compliance with the Requirements of California Public Employees’ Retirement System
Description:
The City Council will consider approving the single Comprehensive Schematic Pay Schedule in compliance with the requirements of California Public Employees’ Retirement System to incorporate the addition of the Electrician I/II Flex Series classification.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution approving a Comprehensive Schematic Pay Schedule for all full-time and part-time employees in accordance with California Public Employees’ Retirement System guidelines.
BACKGROUND:
Resolution No. 2023-103 delegated the authority to the City Manager to approve the recommended new job classification and respective job descriptions as presented in the Mid-Cycle Budget. On June 20, 2023, the creation of the Electrician I/II Flex Series classification was approved.
DISCUSSION:
A Comprehensive Salary Schematic Pay (“Schedule”) for the City of Santa Maria is created and presented in accordance with California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) regulations intended to ensure consistency when reporting compensation for City employees. The Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL) Government Code Section 20636(b)(1) requires pay amounts to be paid pursuant to publicly available pay schedules. The Schedule includes pay rate information for all full - time and part-time employees. The Schedule enhances the disclosure and transparency of public employee compensation by requiring that the pay rates be listed on a single -pay schedule as per CalPERS’ requirements. The Schedule (Attachment A) incorporates the change reflected in the Electrician I/II Flex Series classifications. Upon adoption of the Resolution by the City Council, the Schedule will be posted on the City of Santa Maria’s website.
2 Alternative(s)
A decision by the City Council not to approve the Comprehensive Schematic Pay Schedule would result in being out of compliance with California Public Employees’ Retirement System.
Fiscal Considerations
None
Impact to the Community
The requested schedule change will enhance service to the community and maintain compliance with California Public Employees’ Retirement System.
ATTACHMENTS
A: FT_PT_LS_Salary Schematic
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE
SCHEMATIC PAY SCHEDULE FOR ALL FULL-TIME AND PART-TIME
EMPLOYEES IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM GUIDELINES
WHEREAS, job classification takes into account the content and scope of a job; employee knowledge, skills, and abilities; and employee performance; and
WHEREAS, Section 2-20.04.1 (a) Job Description (Specifications) states in part, “The specifications, when approved by the City Council, shall constitute the official class specifications for the City service”; and
WHEREAS, Section 2-20.04.1 (b) Job Description (Specifications) states in part, “Each specification shall include, but not be limited to, the class title, a brief description of the scope, nature, and responsibility of the class; a description of the tasks or essential duties ordinarily performed in the positions allocated to the class; a statement of the minimum qualifications considered necessary for proficient performance of the work, including education, experience, training, knowledge and abilities, skills, physical characteristics, and any additional factors considered pertinent.”; and
WHEREAS Resolution No. 2023-103 authorized the City Manager to approve the new job classifications and respective job descriptions as presented in the 2023 -24 Mid- Cycle City Budget; and
WHEREAS, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) limits “compensation earnable” for retirement purposes to amounts listed on a Comprehensive Schematic Pay Schedule meeting requirements set forth in section 570.5 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations, including that government agency employers provide and make available to the public the salary of all full-time and part-time employees in a single salary format specified by CalPERS; and
WHEREAS, the City has compiled the necessary salary data to create a single comprehensive schematic pay schedule in compliance with the requirement s of CalPERS, attached to the Council Agenda Report as Attachment A, dated May 21, 2024.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:
1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein.
2. The Comprehensive Schematic Pay Schedule for all full-time and part-time employees attached to the City Council Agenda Report as Attachment A, dated May 21, 2024, incorporated herein by reference, is hereby authorized and approved; and
3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 21st May 2024.
ATTEST:
Chief Deputy City Clerk
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_________________________
Interim Department Director
_________________________
Interim City Manager
City of Santa Maria
Schematic Full-Time Bi-Weekly Rates
Effective 05-21-2024
Grade Description Assoc.Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step F Step G Step H 322 ACCOUNT CLERK - SCALE HOUSE g 1,792.84 1,882.48 1,976.60 2,075.43 2,179.20 324 ACCOUNT CLERK I g 1,749.07 1,836.52 1,928.35 2,024.77 2,126.01 323 ACCOUNT CLERK II g 1,934.36 2,031.08 2,132.63 2,239.26 2,351.22 370 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN I g 2,124.16 2,230.37 2,341.89 2,458.98 2,581.93 371 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN II g 2,342.40 2,459.52 2,582.50 2,711.63 2,847.21 374 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN III g 2,459.51 2,582.49 2,711.61 2,847.19 2,989.55 367 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT g 2,331.53 2,448.11 2,570.52 2,699.05 2,834.00 436 ADMINISTRATIVE LEADER m 3,458.64 3,614.28 3,776.92 3,946.88 4,124.49 4,310.09 4,504.04 4,706.72 447 ARFF SPECIALIST I f 2,660.59 2,793.62 2,933.30 3,079.97 3,233.97 448 ARFF SPECIALIST II f 2,926.60 3,072.93 3,226.58 3,387.91 3,557.31 176 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY (Org Leader
Broadband - Non Safety)m 6,209.15 ---10,348.58
146 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER (Corp Leader
Broadband - Non Safety)m 7,864.91 ---12,004.34
203 ASSISTANT PLANNER g 2,386.39 2,505.71 2,631.00 2,762.55 2,900.68 008 ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER m 4,472.45 4,696.07 4,930.87 5,177.41 5,436.28 204 ASSOCIATE PLANNER g 3,010.89 3,161.43 3,319.50 3,485.48 3,659.75 176 ASST DIR OF RECREATION & PARKS (Org Leader
Broadband - Non Safety)m 6,209.15 ---10,348.58
388 AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE WRITER g 2,533.34 2,660.01 2,793.01 2,932.66 3,079.29 140 BUILDING DIVISION MANAGER m 4,867.99 5,111.39 5,366.96 5,635.31 5,917.08 217 BUILDING INSPECTOR I g 2,517.25 2,643.11 2,775.27 2,914.03 3,059.73 220 BUILDING INSPECTOR II g 2,775.92 2,914.72 3,060.46 3,213.48 3,374.15 347 BUILDING PERMIT TECHNICIAN I g 2,156.35 2,264.17 2,377.38 2,496.25 2,621.06 348 BUILDING PERMIT TECHNICIAN II g 2,386.65 2,505.98 2,631.28 2,762.84 2,900.98 438 BUSINESS LEADER m 4,918.53 5,139.86 5,371.16 5,612.86 5,865.44 6,129.38 6,405.21 6,693.44 173/174/
175/181 BUSINESS PROGRAM LEADER (Broadband)m 3,458.64 ---6,295.25 164 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST m 3,843.08 4,035.23 4,236.99 4,448.84 4,671.28 230 CAD TECHNICIAN g 2,643.52 2,775.70 2,914.49 3,060.21 3,213.22 264 CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR g 3,059.46 3,212.43 3,373.05 3,541.70 3,718.79 130 CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK m 4,330.10 4,546.61 4,773.94 5,012.64 5,263.27 146 CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER (Corp Leader
Broadband - Non Safety)m 7,864.91 ---12,004.34
146 CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (Corp Leader
Broadband - Non Safety)m 7,864.91 ---12,004.34
150 CHIEF OF POLICE (Corp Leader Broadband - Safety)psmp 8,319.23 ---12,478.85 226 CHIEF PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR g 2,680.06 2,814.06 2,954.76 3,102.50 3,257.63 146 CITY ATTORNEY (Corp Leader Broadband - Non
Safety)m 7,864.91 ---12,004.34
179 CITY MANAGER (Broadband)m 9,766.02 ---13,906.52
166 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I g 2,327.73 2,444.12 2,566.33 2,694.65 2,829.38 167 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II g 2,541.92 2,669.02 2,802.47 2,942.59 3,089.72 165 CODE ENFORCEMENT SUPERVISOR g 3,059.60 3,212.58 3,373.21 3,541.87 3,718.96 168 CODE ENFORCEMENT TECHNICIAN g 1,872.00 1,965.60 2,063.88 2,167.07 2,275.42 211 COMMUNITY PROGRAMS MANAGER m 4,179.80 4,388.79 4,608.23 4,838.64 5,080.57 340 CONFIDENTIAL OFFICE CLERK I m 1,573.80 1,652.49 1,735.11 1,821.87 1,912.96 341 CONFIDENTIAL OFFICE CLERK II m 1,738.87 1,825.81 1,917.10 2,012.96 2,113.61 311 CONFIDENTIAL SECRETARY m 2,174.87 2,283.61 2,397.79 2,517.68 2,643.56 343 CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICIAN I m 2,174.87 2,283.61 2,397.79 2,517.68 2,643.56 344 CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICIAN II m 2,397.79 2,517.68 2,643.56 2,775.74 2,914.53 346 CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICIAN III m 2,775.75 2,914.54 3,060.27 3,213.28 3,373.94 146 CORPORATE/EXECUTIVE LEADER - NON SAFETY
(Broadband)m 7,864.91 ---12,004.34
150 CORPORATE/EXECUTIVE LEADER - SAFETY
(Broadband)psm 8,319.23 ---12,478.85
265 CREW LEADER/MAINTENACE SPECIALIST g 2,280.46 2,394.48 2,514.20 2,639.91 2,771.91 298 CRIME ANALYST g 2,729.57 2,866.05 3,009.35 3,159.82 3,317.81 421 CRIME LAB AND EVIDENCE SUPV pn 4,157.81 4,365.70 4,583.99 4,813.19 5,053.85 417 CRIMINALISTICS TECHNICIAN I pn 2,594.47 2,724.19 2,860.40 3,003.42 3,153.59 418 CRIMINALISTICS TECHNICIAN II pn 3,363.72 3,531.91 3,708.51 3,893.94 4,088.64 331 CUSTOMER SERVICE CLERK g 1,506.06 1,581.36 1,660.43 1,743.45 1,830.62 389 CUSTOMER SERVICE TECHNICIAN g 2,193.40 2,303.07 2,418.22 2,539.13 2,666.09 439 DEPUTY BUILDING OFFICIAL m 3,894.39 4,089.11 4,293.57 4,508.25 4,733.66 373 DEPUTY CITY CLERK m 2,408.16 2,528.57 2,655.00 2,787.75 2,927.14 009 DEPUTY CITY MANAGER m 5,951.96 6,249.56 6,562.04 6,890.14 7,234.65 176 DEPUTY DIRECTOR - SOLID WASTE (Org Leader
Broadband - Non Safety)m 6,209.15 ---10,348.58
Bi-Weekly Rates
03/19/2024
ATTACHMENT A
City of Santa Maria
Schematic Full-Time Bi-Weekly Rates
Effective 05-21-2024
Grade Description Assoc.Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step F Step G Step H Bi-Weekly Rates
178 DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF (Org Leader Broadband-
Safety)psmf 6,447.41 ---10,607.03
424 DIGITAL FORENSICS EXAMINER pn 3,628.46 3,809.88 4,000.37 4,200.39 4,410.41 146 DIR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (Corp Leader
Broadband - Non Safety)m 7,864.91 ---12,004.34
146 DIR OF PUBLIC WORKS (Corp Leader Broadband -
Non Safety)m 7,864.91 ---12,004.34
146 DIR OF RECREATION & PARKS (Corp Leader
Broadband - Non Safety)m 7,864.91 ---12,004.34
146 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE (Corp Leader Broadband -
Non Safety)m 7,864.91 ---12,004.34
146 DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES (Corp Leader Broadband -
Non Safety)m 7,864.91 ---12,004.34
319 DISPATCHER I pn 2,528.10 2,654.51 2,787.24 2,926.60 3,072.93 320 DISPATCHER II pn 2,932.60 3,079.23 3,233.19 3,394.85 3,564.59 239 ELECTRICIAN I g 2,656.92 2,789.77 2,929.26 3,075.72 3,229.51 227 ELECTRICIAN II g 3,075.72 3,229.51 3,390.99 3,560.54 3,738.57 302 ENGINEER I g 3,060.17 3,213.18 3,373.84 3,542.53 3,719.66 303 ENGINEER II g 3,373.86 3,542.55 3,719.68 3,905.66 4,100.94 317 ENGINEER III g 3,719.70 3,905.69 4,100.97 4,306.02 4,521.32 231 ENGINEERING TECH II g 2,382.31 2,501.43 2,626.50 2,757.83 2,895.72 232 ENGINEERING TECH III g 2,643.52 2,775.70 2,914.49 3,060.21 3,213.22 228 EQUIPMENT MECHANIC I g 2,200.20 2,310.21 2,425.72 2,547.01 2,674.36 225 EQUIPMENT MECHANIC II g 2,371.09 2,489.64 2,614.12 2,744.83 2,882.07 190 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT m 2,954.65 3,102.38 3,257.50 3,420.38 3,591.40 253 FACILITIES SUPERVISOR g 3,208.25 3,368.66 3,537.09 3,713.94 3,899.64 281 FIELD MECHANIC g 2,492.31 2,616.93 2,747.78 2,885.17 3,029.43 332 FINANCE CLERK I g 1,792.86 1,882.50 1,976.63 2,075.46 2,179.23 333 FINANCE CLERK II g 1,977.00 2,075.85 2,179.64 2,288.62 2,403.05 329 FINANCE LEAD CLERK g 2,174.74 2,283.48 2,397.65 2,517.53 2,643.41 449 FIRE BATTALION CHIEF psmf 6,000.81 6,300.85 6,615.89 6,946.68 7,294.01 450 FIRE CAPTAIN f 3,681.37 3,865.44 4,058.71 4,261.65 4,474.73 189 FIRE CHIEF (Corp Leader Broadband - Safety)psmf 8,319.23 ---12,478.85 451 FIRE ENGINEER f 3,233.58 3,395.26 3,565.02 3,743.27 3,930.43 452 FIRE FIGHTER f 2,926.60 3,072.93 3,226.58 3,387.91 3,557.31 453 FIRE FIGHTER IN TRAINING f 2,191.45 2,301.02 2,416.07 2,536.87 2,663.71 443 FIRE INSPECTOR I f 2,553.12 2,680.78 2,814.82 2,955.56 3,103.34 444 FIRE INSPECTOR II f 2,814.83 2,955.57 3,103.35 3,258.52 3,421.45 446 FIRE MARSHAL m 5,861.06 6,154.11 6,461.82 6,784.91 7,124.16 295 FIRE PREVENTION OFFICER I f 2,660.59 2,793.62 2,933.30 3,079.97 3,233.97 296 FIRE PREVENTION OFFICER II f 2,926.60 3,072.93 3,226.58 3,387.91 3,557.31 254 FLEET SERVICES SUPERVISOR g 3,368.69 3,537.12 3,713.98 3,899.68 4,094.66 182 GIS ANALYST g 3,608.37 3,788.79 3,978.23 4,177.14 4,386.00 299 GIS MANAGER m 3,730.32 3,916.84 4,112.68 4,318.31 4,534.23 192 GIS TECHNICIAN I g 2,811.50 2,952.08 3,099.68 3,254.66 3,417.39 193 GIS TECHNICIAN II g 3,099.67 3,254.65 3,417.38 3,588.25 3,767.66 372 GRANTS SPECIALIST I g 2,454.82 2,577.56 2,706.44 2,841.76 2,983.85 378 GRANTS SPECIALIST II g 2,706.46 2,841.78 2,983.87 3,133.06 3,289.71 209 GROUNDSKEEPER g 1,663.99 1,747.19 1,834.55 1,926.28 2,022.59 400 HEAVY EQUIPMENT MECHANIC g 2,692.55 2,827.18 2,968.54 3,116.97 3,272.82 401 HOUSING & COMMUNITY SERVICE TECHNICIAN g 2,386.65 2,505.98 2,631.28 2,762.84 2,900.98 423 INVESTIGATIVE SPECIALIST pn 2,515.88 2,641.67 2,773.75 2,912.44 3,058.06 426 INVESTIGATIVE SPECIALIST I (Flex)pn 2,515.88 2,641.67 2,773.75 2,912.44 3,058.06 427 INVESTIGATIVE SPECIALIST II (Flex)pn 2,773.76 2,912.45 3,058.07 3,210.97 3,371.52 286 LABORATORY COORDINATOR g 2,962.75 3,110.89 3,266.43 3,429.75 3,601.24 275 LANDFILL HEAVY EQUIP LEAD OPR g 2,590.59 2,720.12 2,856.13 2,998.94 3,148.89 274 LANDFILL HEAVY EQUIP OPR g 2,349.69 2,467.17 2,590.53 2,720.06 2,856.06 276 LANDFILL HEAVY EQUIP OPR II g 2,467.17 2,590.53 2,720.06 2,856.06 2,998.86 432 LEAD CUSTOMER SERVICE TECHNICIAN g 2,618.05 2,748.95 2,886.40 3,030.72 3,182.26 282 LEAD MECHANIC g 2,747.81 2,885.20 3,029.46 3,180.93 3,339.98 425 LEAD POLICE SERVICE TECHNICIAN pn 2,629.14 2,760.60 2,898.63 3,043.56 3,195.74 307 LEAD WASTEWATER OPERATOR g 3,090.40 3,244.92 3,407.17 3,577.53 3,756.41 308 LEAD WATER OPERATOR g 3,090.40 3,244.92 3,407.17 3,577.53 3,756.41 428 LEGAL OFFICE SPECIALIST - CONFIDENTIAL m 2,775.75 2,914.54 3,060.27 3,213.28 3,373.94 350 LIBRARIAN I g 2,289.79 2,404.28 2,524.49 2,650.71 2,783.25 248 LIBRARIAN II g 2,529.93 2,656.43 2,789.25 2,928.71 3,075.15 147 LIBRARIAN III m 4,266.77 4,480.11 4,704.12 4,939.33 5,186.30 352 LIBRARY ASSISTANT I g 1,932.62 2,029.25 2,130.71 2,237.25 2,349.11 354 LIBRARY ASSISTANT II g 2,130.99 2,237.54 2,349.42 2,466.89 2,590.23 351 LIBRARY CLERK g 1,506.06 1,581.36 1,660.43 1,743.45 1,830.62 03/19/2024
City of Santa Maria
Schematic Full-Time Bi-Weekly Rates
Effective 05-21-2024
Grade Description Assoc.Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step F Step G Step H Bi-Weekly Rates
146 LIBRARY DIRECTOR (Corp Leader Broadband - Non
Safety)m 7,864.91 ---12,004.34
353 LIBRARY TECHNICIAN g 2,125.23 2,231.49 2,343.06 2,460.21 2,583.22 244 MAINTENANCE WORKER I g 1,794.91 1,884.66 1,978.89 2,077.83 2,181.72 240 MAINTENANCE WORKER II g 1,934.36 2,031.08 2,132.63 2,239.26 2,351.22 330 OFFICE ASSISTANT I g 1,506.06 1,581.36 1,660.43 1,743.45 1,830.62 328 OFFICE ASSISTANT II g 1,663.99 1,747.19 1,834.55 1,926.28 2,022.59 176 ORGANIZATIONAL / ENTERPRISE LEADER - NON
SAFETY (Broadband)m 6,209.15 ---10,348.58
177 ORGANIZATIONAL / ENTERPRISE LEADER -
SAFETY (Broadband)psm 6,447.41 ---10,607.03
382 OUTREACH COORDINATOR g 2,156.35 2,264.17 2,377.38 2,496.25 2,621.06 183 PARK SERVICE OFFICER g 1,841.76 1,933.85 2,030.54 2,132.07 2,238.67 238 PARK SERVICES OFFICER II g 2,234.79 2,346.53 2,463.86 2,587.05 2,716.40 283 PARK SERVICES OFFICER III g 2,726.43 2,862.75 3,005.89 3,156.18 3,313.99 268 PARKS & FOREST SUPERVISOR g 3,181.43 3,340.50 3,507.53 3,682.91 3,867.06 430 PEG PRODUCTION MANAGER m 2,979.48 3,128.45 3,284.87 3,449.11 3,621.57 278 PLAN CHECK ENGINEER m 4,724.94 4,961.19 5,209.25 5,469.71 5,743.20 124 PLANNING DIVISION MANAGER m 5,988.50 6,287.93 6,602.33 6,932.45 7,279.07 216 PLANNING TECHNICIAN g 2,177.92 2,286.82 2,401.16 2,521.22 2,647.28 297 PLANS EXAMINER g 2,910.57 3,056.10 3,208.91 3,369.36 3,537.83 422 POLICE CORPORAL p 3,650.13 3,832.64 4,024.27 4,225.48 4,436.75 177 POLICE DIVISION COMMANDER (Org Leader
Broadband - Safety)psmp 6,447.41 ---10,607.03
416 POLICE LIEUTENANT pmm 5,725.95 6,012.25 6,312.86 6,628.50 6,959.93 413 POLICE OFFICER p 3,386.97 3,556.32 3,734.14 3,920.85 4,116.89 355 POLICE RECORDS SUPERVISOR g 2,685.95 2,820.25 2,961.26 3,109.32 3,264.79 327 POLICE RECORDS TECH-DETECTIVES g 2,205.00 2,315.25 2,431.01 2,552.56 2,680.19 325 POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN I g 2,041.79 2,143.88 2,251.07 2,363.62 2,481.80 326 POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN II g 2,205.00 2,315.25 2,431.01 2,552.56 2,680.19 410 POLICE SERGEANT pmm 4,622.39 4,853.51 5,096.19 5,351.00 5,618.55 256 POLICE SERVICES TECHNICIAN pn 2,384.71 2,503.95 2,629.15 2,760.61 2,898.64 390 POLICE TRAINEE pn 2,842.06 2,984.16 3,133.37 3,290.04 3,454.54 293 PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER m 5,270.93 5,534.48 5,811.20 6,101.76 6,406.85 127 PRINCIPAL PLANNER m 4,701.33 4,936.40 5,183.22 5,442.38 5,714.50 437 PROGRAM LEADER m 4,124.48 4,310.08 4,504.04 4,706.72 4,918.52 5,139.85 5,371.15 5,612.86 362 PROPERTY-EVIDENCE CLERK g 2,382.67 2,501.80 2,626.89 2,758.23 2,896.14 241 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR g 2,430.91 2,552.46 2,680.08 2,814.08 2,954.78 135 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MGR m 4,867.99 5,111.39 5,366.96 5,635.31 5,917.08 169 PUBLIC WORKS TECHNICIAN I g 2,156.35 2,264.17 2,377.38 2,496.25 2,621.06 170 PUBLIC WORKS TECHNICIAN II g 2,386.65 2,505.98 2,631.28 2,762.84 2,900.98 257 RECREATION COORDINATOR g 2,291.84 2,406.43 2,526.75 2,653.09 2,785.74 285 RECREATION SUPERVISOR g 2,652.43 2,785.05 2,924.30 3,070.52 3,224.05 259 RECREATION TECHNICIAN g 2,156.35 2,264.17 2,377.38 2,496.25 2,621.06 316 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MANAGER m 4,867.99 5,111.39 5,366.96 5,635.31 5,917.08 252 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST I g 2,420.65 2,541.68 2,668.76 2,802.20 2,942.31 314 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST II g 2,668.76 2,802.20 2,942.31 3,089.43 3,243.90 431 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SUPERVISOR g 3,059.60 3,212.58 3,373.21 3,541.87 3,718.96 312 SECRETARY g 2,050.37 2,152.89 2,260.53 2,373.56 2,492.24 313 SECRETARY TO THE CITY MANAGER m 2,688.74 2,823.18 2,964.34 3,112.56 3,268.19 176 SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY (Org Leader
Broadband - Non Safety)m 6,209.15 ---10,348.58
349 SENIOR BUILDING PERMIT TECH g 2,547.17 2,674.53 2,808.26 2,948.67 3,096.10 292 SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER g 4,073.98 4,277.68 4,491.56 4,716.14 4,951.95 267 SENIOR CREW LEADER-MAINT SPEC g 2,394.47 2,514.19 2,639.90 2,771.90 2,910.50 321 SENIOR DISPATCHER pn 3,234.64 3,396.37 3,566.19 3,744.50 3,931.73 237 SENIOR PARK SERVICES OFFICER g 3,349.86 3,517.35 3,693.22 3,877.88 4,071.77 205 SENIOR PLANNER g 3,549.61 3,727.09 3,913.44 4,109.11 4,314.57 201 SENIOR PLANS EXAMINER g 3,373.86 3,542.55 3,719.68 3,905.66 4,100.94 337 SENIOR POLICE RECORDS TECH g 2,315.25 2,431.01 2,552.56 2,680.19 2,814.20 163 SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER m 4,472.45 4,696.07 4,930.87 5,177.41 5,436.28 210 SENIOR SYSTEMS ANALYST m 4,812.24 5,052.85 5,305.49 5,570.76 5,849.30 304 SENIOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECH g 2,856.01 2,998.81 3,148.75 3,306.19 3,471.50 184 SHAREPOINT DEVELOPER g 3,680.95 3,865.00 4,058.25 4,261.16 4,474.22 195 SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS SUPV g 3,333.47 3,500.14 3,675.15 3,858.91 4,051.86 196 SOLID WASTE EQUIP CREW LDR g 2,289.03 2,403.48 2,523.65 2,649.83 2,782.32 246 SOLID WASTE EQUIP LEAD OPR g 2,531.50 2,658.08 2,790.98 2,930.53 3,077.06 222 SOLID WASTE EQUIPMENT OPR I g 2,137.26 2,244.12 2,356.33 2,474.15 2,597.86 224 SOLID WASTE EQUIPMENT OPR II g 2,180.00 2,289.00 2,403.45 2,523.62 2,649.80 197 SOLID WASTE LANDFILL SUPV g 3,333.47 3,500.14 3,675.15 3,858.91 4,051.86 03/19/2024
City of Santa Maria
Schematic Full-Time Bi-Weekly Rates
Effective 05-21-2024
Grade Description Assoc.Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step F Step G Step H Bi-Weekly Rates
154 SOLID WASTE MANAGER m 5,270.93 5,534.48 5,811.20 6,101.76 6,406.85 380 SPECIAL DISTRICTS COORDINATOR g 3,181.43 3,340.50 3,507.53 3,682.91 3,867.06 358 SPECIAL DISTRICTS SUPERVISOR g 3,548.99 3,726.44 3,912.76 4,108.40 4,313.82 381 SPECIAL DISTRICTS TECHNICIAN g 2,454.32 2,577.04 2,705.89 2,841.18 2,983.24 271 STREET MAINT SUPERVISOR g 3,208.25 3,368.66 3,537.09 3,713.94 3,899.64 214 SYSTEMS ANALYST I g 3,337.92 3,504.82 3,680.06 3,864.06 4,057.26 215 SYSTEMS ANALYST II g 3,680.95 3,865.00 4,058.25 4,261.16 4,474.22 290 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN g 2,656.76 2,789.60 2,929.08 3,075.53 3,229.31 202 TRANSIT ASSISTANT g 1,663.99 1,747.19 1,834.55 1,926.28 2,022.59 229 TRANSIT COORDINATOR g 2,339.62 2,456.60 2,579.43 2,708.40 2,843.82 185 TRANSIT PLANNER g 3,024.98 3,176.23 3,335.04 3,501.79 3,676.88 288 TRANSIT SERVICES MANAGER m 4,867.99 5,111.39 5,366.96 5,635.31 5,917.08 383 UTILITIES ACCOUNTING TECH I g 2,124.16 2,230.37 2,341.89 2,458.98 2,581.93 384 UTILITIES ACCOUNTING TECH II g 2,342.40 2,459.52 2,582.50 2,711.63 2,847.21 385 UTILITIES ACCOUNTING TECH III g 2,459.51 2,582.49 2,711.61 2,847.19 2,989.55 387 UTILITIES OUTREACH SPECIALIST g 1,928.09 2,024.49 2,125.71 2,232.00 2,343.60 207 UTILITIES TECHNOLOGY ANALYST g 3,337.92 3,504.82 3,680.06 3,864.06 4,057.26 334 UTILITY BILLING LEAD CLERK g 2,174.74 2,283.48 2,397.65 2,517.53 2,643.41 223 UTILITY BILLING SUPERVISOR g 2,283.46 2,397.63 2,517.51 2,643.39 2,775.56 306 WASTEWATER OPERATOR g 2,618.05 2,748.95 2,886.40 3,030.72 3,182.26 405 WASTEWATER OPERATOR I g 2,325.08 2,441.33 2,563.40 2,691.57 2,826.15 406 WASTEWATER OPERATOR II g 2,618.05 2,748.95 2,886.40 3,030.72 3,182.26 407 WASTEWATER OPERATOR III g 2,886.41 3,030.73 3,182.27 3,341.38 3,508.45 305 WASTEWATER OPERATOR TRAINEE g 2,325.08 2,441.33 2,563.40 2,691.57 2,826.15 198 WASTEWATER SUPERVISOR g 3,830.42 4,021.94 4,223.04 4,434.19 4,655.90 247 WATER CONSERVATION SPECIALIST g 1,934.36 2,031.08 2,132.63 2,239.26 2,351.22 309 WATER OPERATOR g 2,618.05 2,748.95 2,886.40 3,030.72 3,182.26 402 WATER OPERATOR I g 2,325.08 2,441.33 2,563.40 2,691.57 2,826.15 403 WATER OPERATOR II g 2,618.05 2,748.95 2,886.40 3,030.72 3,182.26 404 WATER OPERATOR III g 2,886.41 3,030.73 3,182.27 3,341.38 3,508.45 310 WATER OPERATOR TRAINEE g 2,325.08 2,441.33 2,563.40 2,691.57 2,826.15 258 WATER RESOURCES LEAD OPERATOR g 3,140.26 3,297.27 3,462.13 3,635.24 3,817.00 134 WATER RESOURCES MANAGER m 5,270.93 5,534.48 5,811.20 6,101.76 6,406.85 263 WATER RESOURCES OPERATOR g 2,848.27 2,990.68 3,140.21 3,297.22 3,462.08 199 WATER SUPERVISOR g 3,830.42 4,021.94 4,223.04 4,434.19 4,655.90 243 WATER SYSTEM OPERATOR I g 2,268.43 2,381.85 2,500.94 2,625.99 2,757.29 249 WATER SYSTEM OPERATOR II g 2,554.11 2,681.82 2,815.91 2,956.71 3,104.55 03/19/2024
City of Santa Maria
Schematic Hourly Rates
Effective 05/21/2024
Grade Description Assoc.Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E za ACCOUNT CLERK AIDE z 19.96 20.96 22.01 23.11 24.27
ac ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I e 21.07 22.12 23.23 --
ab ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE II e 24.39 25.62 26.89 --
aa ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE III e 28.33 29.75 31.24 --
al ASSIST LIBRARY TECHNICIAN e 16.75 17.59 18.47 --
as ASSISTANT CLERK - OFFICE e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
ap ASST PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR e 29.06 30.51 32.04 --
ae AQUATICS SAFETY & EDUCATIONAL SPEC e 17.90 18.80 19.74 -- bp BUSINESS PROGRAM LEADER I (Broadband)mpt 41.17 ---52.98 cd CERTIFIED DISPATCH AIDE e 31.44 33.01 34.66
zc CLERK II z 17.23 18.09 18.99 19.94 20.94
zx COMMUNITY OUTREACH COORDINATOR z 24.35 25.57 26.85 28.19 29.60 cl CONSULTANT I e 39.92 41.92 44.02 --
cm CONSULTANT II e 46.23 48.53 50.96 --
cn CONSULTANT III e 53.85 56.54 59.36 --
co CONSULTANT IV e 63.04 68.29 73.54 --
cp CUSTOMER SERVICE PHONE OPER*e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
ya EMERGENCY SERVICES SPECIALIST z 33.41 35.08 36.83 38.67 40.60 ec EXECUTIVE CONSULTANT e 112.00 117.60 123.48
zp FACILITY SPECIALIST II z 20.52 21.55 22.63 23.76 24.95 zq FACILITY SPECIALIST III z 22.07 23.17 24.33 25.55 26.83 lo GENERAL LABORER e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
zl GRAPHICS TECHNICIAN z 18.96 19.91 20.91 21.96 23.06
d1 INTERIM DIRECTOR I e 63.04 68.29 73.54 --
d2 INTERIM DIRECTOR II e 78.80 84.05 89.30 --
d3 INTERIM DIRECTOR III e 94.55 99.81 105.06 --
ci INTERN - GENERAL e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
ei INTERN - PROFESSION e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
i1 INVESTIGATIVE OFFICER I e 73.54 0.00 0.00 --
i2 INVESTIGATIVE OFFICER II e 105.06 0.00 0.00 --
zf LABORER III z 18.11 19.02 19.97 20.97 22.02
lp LIBRARY PAGE e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
zg LIBRARY TECHNICAL ASSISTANT z 20.49 21.51 22.59 23.72 24.91 lg LIFEGUARD e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
mt MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
ma MULTIMEDIA ASSISTANT e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
ps PARK SERVICES AIDE e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
zy PARK SERVICES COORDINATOR z 42.48 44.60 46.83 49.17 51.63 pc POLICE CADET e 16.75 17.59 18.47 --
zi POLICE RECORDS CLERK z 18.98 19.93 20.93 21.98 23.08 po PROVISIONAL OFFICER e 39.91 41.91 44.01 46.21 48.52
ra RECREATION ACTIVITY SPECIALIST z 18.30 19.22 20.18 21.19 22.25 re RECREATION LEADER II e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
rc REGULATORY COMPLIANCE CLERK e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
ao RESERVE POLICE OFFICER LEVEL 1 e 21.01 ----
bo RESERVE POLICE OFFICER LEVEL 2 e 17.86 ----
ze SECURITY GUARD z 20.81 21.85 22.94 24.09 25.29
zz SENIOR LIFEGUARD z 20.21 21.22 22.28 23.39 24.56
sl SKILLED LABORER e 22.02 23.12 24.28 --
sa STAFF AIDE - FACILITIES e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
zt STAFF ASSISTANT z 17.60 18.48 19.40 20.37 21.39
si SWIM INSTRUCTOR e 17.90 18.80 19.74 --
sc SWIM POOL CLERK e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
t1 TECHNICAL AIDE I e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
t2 TECHNICAL AIDE II e 16.00 16.80 17.64 --
t3 TECHNICAL AIDE III e 18.20 19.11 20.06 --
tp TEMPORARY PLANNER e 34.84 36.59 38.41 --
zr TRANSIT TECHNICIAN z 20.49 21.51 22.59 23.72 24.91
Part Time Rates
FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 21, 2024
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada
BY: Assistant City Clerk Alexandra Valadez
SUBJECT: Bond Release for Carpenter’s Local 1800, Tract 6016
Description:
The City Council will consider authorizing the bond release for Carpenter’s Local 1800, Tract 6016.
Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.
RECOMMENDATION:
By motion, accept as complete the public improvements associated with Carpenter’s Local 1800, Tract 6016, and authorize the release of Fai thful Performance Bond [#36K000069] in the full amount of $136,910 posted in the form of a Surety to guarantee the construction and installation of public improvements off -site; and order that the Labor and Material Bond in the amount of $68,455 and the Gu arantee and Defective Material bond in the amount of $13,691, and Tree Bond [#36K000070] in the amount of $4,125 be retained for six months, one year, and one year, respectively, from the date of the release of the Faithful Performance Bond for public improvements.
BACKGROUND:
The Parcel Map and Agreement for this subdivision were approved by City Council on April 21, 2020.
DISCUSSION:
At the request of the developer, inquiries were sent to the various departments on April 2, 2024, requesting authorization to release the Faithful Performance bond in the original amount of $136,910. Full releases were granted by each department.
Fiscal Considerations
None.
Impact to the Community
None.
ATTACHMENT A
4/2/2024
DATE
5/2/2024
RETURN DEADLINE
TO:
Finance
Public Works/Engineering
Recreation and Parks
Community Development
Fire
FROM: City Clerk
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR RELEASE/REDUCTION OF BOND
A request has been made by
Western States Carpenters
Scott Zimmerman
regarding
Carpenters Local 1800, Tract 6016
for the release or reduction of a Faithful Performance Bond posted in the form of a Surety # 36K000069
the purpose of guaranteeing the following:
in the amount of $ 136,910.00
as accepted by the City Council for
Construction and installation of public improvements
You are hereby requested to check the appropriate box below and return to the City Clerk's Office at your earliest convenience and, in the event no later than the date indicated above, so that this matter may be completed as soon as possible.
AS FAR AS THIS DEPARTMENT IS CONCERNED:
the release could be made.
this bond could be reduced to $
hold release because the following items have not been completed.
W Ls ,.
Departmen
***Please return original.
By:
'-s-241
Sign Ture Date
4/2/2024
DATE
TO:
Finance
Public Works/Engineering
Recreation and Parks
5/2/2024
RETURN DEADLINE
Community Development
Fire
FROM: City Clerk
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR RELEASE/REDUCTION OF BOND
A request has been made by Scott Zimmerman
Western States Carpenters
regarding
Carpenters Local 1800, Tract 6016
for the release or reduction of a Faithful Performance Bond posted in the form of a Surety # 36K000069
the purpose of guaranteeing the following:
in the amount of $ 136,910.00
as accepted by the City Council for
Construction and installation of public improvements
You are hereby requested to check the appropriate box below and return to the City Clerk's Office at your earliest convenience and, in the event no later than the date indicated above, so that this matter may be completed as soon as possible.
AS FAR AS THIS DEPARTMENT IS CONCERNED:
the release could be made.
this bond could be reduced to $
hold release because the following items have not been completed. (Fitt per,
Department
***Please return original.
By:
Sig ature_ Date
4/2/2024
DATE
5/2/2024
RETURN DEADLINE
TO:
Finance
Public Works/Engineering
Recreation and Parks
Community Development
Fire
FROM: City Clerk
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR RELEASE/REDUCTION OF BOND
A request has been made by
Western States Carpenters
Scott Zimmerman
regarding
Carpenters Local 1800, Tract 6016
for the release or reduction of a Faithful Performance Bond posted in the form of a Surety # 36K000069
the purpose of guaranteeing the following:
in the amount of $ 136,910.00
as accepted by the City Council for
Construction and installation of public improvements
You are hereby requested to check the appropriate box below and return to the City Clerk's Office at your earliest convenience and, in the event no later than the date indicated above, so that this matter may be completed as soon as possible.
AS FAR AS THIS DEPARTMENT IS CONCERNED:
the release could be made.
this bond could be reduced to $
hold release because the following items have not been completed. ***Please return original.
4/2/2024
DATE
5/2/2024
RETURN DEADLINE
TO:
I
11 Finance
Public Works/Engineering
Recreation and Parks
Community Development
Fire
FROM: City Clerk
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR RELEASE/REDUCTION OF BOND
A request has been made by
Western States Carpenters
Scott Zimmerman
regarding
Carpenters Local 1800, Tract 6016
for the release or reduction of a Faithful Performance Bond posted in the form of a Surety # 36K000069
the purpose of guaranteeing the following;
in the amount of $ 136,910.00
as accepted by the City Council for
Construction and installation of public improvements
You are hereby requested to check the appropriate box below and return to the City Clerk's Office at your earliest convenience and, in the event no later than the date indicated above, so that this matter may be completed as soon as possible.
AS FAR AS THIS DEPARTMENT IS CONCERNED:
the release could be made.
this bond could be reduced to $
hold release because the following items have not been completed.
By: Si tore 1 7i • 11)/k,��.
Departm nt g ate
***Please return original.
4/2/2024
DATE
TO:
Finance
Public Works/Engineering
Recreation and Parks
5/2/2024
RETURN DEADLINE
Community Development
Fire
FROM: City Clerk
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR RELEASE/REDUCTION OF BOND
A request has been made by
Western States Carpenters
Scott Zimmerman
regarding
Carpenters Local 1800, Tract 6016
for the release or reduction of a Faithful Performance Bond posted in the form of a Surety # 36K000069
the purpose of guaranteeing the following:
in the amount of $ 136,910.00
as accepted by the City Council for
Construction and installation of public improvements
You are hereby requested to check the appropriate box below and return to the City Clerk's Office at your earliest convenience and, in the event no later than the date indicated above, so that this matter may be completed as soon as possible.
AS FAR AS THIS DEPARTMENT IS CONCERNED:
the release could be made.
this bond could be reduced to $
hold release because the following items have not been completed, nancc.�. By:
Department gnature
***Please return original.
4/3/2-419
Date
FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 21, 2024
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada
BY: Director of Public Works Brett Fulgoni
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Project List For Senate Bill 1
Description:
The City Council will consider approving a Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Project List for Fiscal Year 2024-2025.
Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution approving a Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Project List to be funded by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, Senate Bill 1, and incorporated into the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 budget.
BACKGROUND:
The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, Senate Bill 1 (SB-1), was passed by the State Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017. The purpose of the bill is to help state and local agencies address transportation funding shortfalls. SB-1 has generated revenue through increases in gas tax, vehicle registration fees, and fees on zero-emission vehicles.
One of the major components of SB-1 is the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), which is the revenue stream set aside for the maintenance and rehabilitation of roadways. SB-1 is expected to generate over $5 billion annually at full implementation, $1.5 billion of which will be distributed to local agencies and counties through the RMRA. The City of Santa Maria is projected to receive $2,806,458 in revenues from the RMRA for Fiscal Year 2024 -2025, an increase of $181,016 from the 2023-2024 allocation.
SB-1 includes accountability and transparency provisions to enable residents to remain aware of the projects proposed to be funded by SB -1 in their area. As part of these provisions, it is a requirement for local agencies to adopt project lists before the start of every fiscal year. The project list must include all projects proposed to receive funding
2 from the RMRA. The required list includes a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement. Per the requirements of SB-1, the list must be approved by the City Council through Resolution and sent to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) no later than July 1, 2024, to be eligible for RMRA funding next fiscal year.
The primary focus of the RMRA is the maintenance of the existing infrastructure within the City’s rights-of-way. Other transportation funding sources, such as Gas Tax, Measure A, Local Surface Transportation Program (LSTP), Growth Mitigation, and other grant programs are available for capital expenditures through the normal budget process.
On June 20, 2023, the City Council approved the RMRA project list for the 2023-2024 Fiscal Year, which was then submitted to the CTC as required. The list included one pavement maintenance project. This project was assigned a total of $8,264,991 in the 2023-2024 Fiscal Year budget, which consisted of the gas tax, Measure A, LSTP, general fund, the 2023-2024 RMRA allocation, and the remaining carry-over fund balance from the previous year. Staff recommended including the 2023-2024 Fiscal Year project on the RMRA list due to its eligibility for RMRA funds and based on analysis through the City’s Pavement Management Program (PMP). The previously approved project for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 was:
1. Roadway Rehabilitation Project
Description: This project consisted of dig-outs and restoration of significant pavement failures. The dig-out and replacement of failed areas of pavement on multiple distressed arterials. Additionally, the project also included the installation of new striping and pavement markings. Approximately 400,600 Square Yards of dig-outs.
Project Status: This project is an ongoing project through the 2023-2024 Fiscal Year.
The total amount of SB-1 funds utilized on this project was $2,228,728.
DISCUSSION:
Staff has identified one new pavement rehabilitation project to utilize RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2024-2025. This project is identified as the Roadway Rehabilitation Project.
The project has been identified through the use of the City’s PMP in coordination with staff’s field inspections and recommendations. Staff’s recommendation is to include this project on the RMRA list due to their eligibility for RMRA funds and the ability to be completed within the next fiscal year.
SB-1 RMRA Funded Projects for Fiscal Year 2024-2025:
1. Roadway Rehabilitation Project (Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and prior year remaining funds)
Description: This project will include the surface seal of various roadways in the City of Santa Maria. The surface seal of the roadway will be over previous dig-out
3 areas’ arterials. Additionally, the project also includes the installation of new striping and pavement markings.
Location:
Betteravia Road from E Street to US 101
South Blosser Road from Donovan Road to Betteravia Road Bradley Road from Main Street to Columbia Drive
Carlotti Drive from Nobel Way to Donovan Road
Depot Street from Fesler Street to Main Street
Hidden Pines Way from Blosser Road to Preisker Lane
Main Street from Palisade Drive to Suey Road
Railroad Avenue from Donovan Road to Fesler Street
Suey Road from Donovan Road to Main Street
Bradley Road from Jones Street to Betteravia Road
College Drive from Donovan Road to Main Street
Approval of the Resolution will allow the City to submit the new project to the CTC before the July 1, 2024, deadline and remain eligible for another year of SB -1 funding. The benefit of increased revenue from SB-1 is that it will allow the City to utilize existing budgeted funds to rehabilitate additional roadways this fiscal year that would have been otherwise delayed.
This action does not preclude the City from utilizing these funds for other eligible roadway maintenance projects in Fiscal Year 2024-2025. This action meets the requirements of the RMRA program. During Fiscal Year 2024-2025, if the City decides to utilize these funds for projects not listed, updated reporting at the end of the year to the CTC, as required by the program, will be completed.
Future RMRA project lists to be recommended for approval by the City Council wi ll be selected from the capital improvement program budget plan for roadway maintenance currently being developed by staff as part of its PMP. The anticipated funding projections will support the orderly development, and improvement of other City infrastructure such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities, underground utilities, and drainage.
Alternative(s)
The recommended action is to approve the SB-1 RMRA Project List for Fiscal Year 2024- 2025.
The alternative to the recommended action would be for the City Council to direct staff to revise the project list to include alternate locations. Per the requirements of SB -1, the project list must be approved by the City Council by Resolution and sent to the CTC no later than July 1, 2024. Delaying the approval may jeopardize the City’s eligibility for timely receipt of funds.
4 Fiscal Considerations
Approval of the Resolution will make the City eligible to submit its request to the CTC to receive SB-1 apportionment revenues for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. CTC will review submittals from all agencies in California and adopt project lists at its meeting in August 2024.
Impact to the Community
The community will benefit by receiving transportation revenues that will be used to improve the streets of Santa Maria.
ATTACHMENTS
A. LSR Projected Revenues 23-24 and 24-25
B. LSR Estimates 2023-24, 2024-25
Attachment A
CaliforniaCityFinance.com Updated January 12, 2024
The California Local Government Finance Almanac
Shared Revenue Estimates: State Revenue Allocations to Cities and Counties Local Streets and Roads Estimates: 2023-24, 2024-25
Including Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and
Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
The state of California imposes per-gallon excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel, sales taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel and registration taxes on motor vehicles with allocations dedicated to transportation purposes.1 The local (city and county) portions of these allocations flow through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA), the familiar gasoline tax revenues that have been in place for decades, and the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) which allocates much of the revenue from the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall).
State taxes transferred to and allocated through the state Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) include:
The per gallon “gasoline tax” and “diesel fuel tax” imposed on the use of vehicle fuels. The “use fuel tax,” imposed on vendors and users of motor vehicle fuels that are not taxed under either the gasoline or diesel fuel tax, such as liquefied petroleum gas, ethanol, methanol and natural gas (both liquid and gaseous) for use on state highways. Use Fuel Tax rates vary depending on the type of fuel. Variable rate per gallon gasoline diesel fuel excise taxes imposed in 2010-11 in a complicated arrangement known as the “fuel tax swap.” This rate replaced the previous Proposition 42 sales tax on gasoline.
Transportation taxes allocated to cities and counties through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) established by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) include:
An additional 12 cent per gallon increase to the gasoline excise tax effective November 1, 2017 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020.
An additional 20 cent per gallon increase to the diesel fuel excise tax effective November 1, 2017 with half of the revenues going to the state Trade Corridor Enhancement Account (TCEA) and half to the RMRA. Annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020. An additional vehicle registration tax called the “Transportation Improvement Fee” with rates based on the value of the motor vehicle effective January 1, 2018 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020.
An additional $100 vehicle registration tax on zero emissions vehicles of model year 2020 or later effective July 1, 2020 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2021.
The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) also adopted annual inflationary adjustments beginning July 1, 2020 to all per-gallon motor vehicle fuel excise taxes including the rates allocated through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA).
1 Taxes on aircraft jet fuel are transferred to the state Aeronautics Account. 2217 Isle Royale Lane • Davis, CA • 95616-6616 • Tel 530.758.3952 Attachment B
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA)
Revenue Allocations – Streets & Highways Code Sec 2103-2108 “HUTA” Cities and counties receive revenue from the motor vehicle fuel taxes imposed pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7360(a) and (b) through the Highway User Tax Account under the following formulas outlined in the Streets and Highways code and illustrated in Figure 1.
Section 2104. Section 2104 allocates funds to counties with designated allotments for engineering and administration, snow removal, heavy rainfall / storm damage as well as county streets, roads and public mass transit guideways and facilities.
Section 2105. Section 2105(a) allocates 11.5 percent of the tax revenues in excess of 9 cents per gallon (i.e. the Proposition 111 rate) monthly among counties based on population.
Section 2105(b) allocates 11.5 percent of the tax revenues in excess of 9 cents per gallon (i.e. the Proposition 111 rate) monthly among cities based on population.
Section 2106. Revenues equal to 1.04 cents per gallon are allocated as follows:
a. $7.2 million per year to the State Bicycle Transportation Account. b. $400 per month to each city ($2,308,800 per year among the 481 eligible cities2) c. $800 per month to each county ($556,800 per year among the 58 counties) d. The residual amount to each county and the cities in that county based on registered vehicles. In each county, from this amount, the county receives an allotment based on the share of assessed value of the county which is in the unincorporated area. The remainder is allocated to the cities within the county based on population.
2 The city of Rolling Hills has only private streets and is therefor not eligible to receive these allocations.
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Section 2107. This section provides monthly allocations to cities of 1.315 cents per gallon of gasoline, 1.8 cents per gallon of diesel, and 2.59 cents per liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), as follows. a. Each city with snow removal costs in excess of $5,000 is allocated 50 percent of the cost exceeding $5,000.
b. The remainder is allocated to cities based on population.
Section 2107.5. These funds (about $2.7 million per year) are allocated to cities annually in July based on population as follows:
Section 2107.5 funds must be used for engineering costs and administrative expenses related to city streets. Cities with populations under 10,000 may also expend the moneys for street construction or acquisition of street rights-of-way.
Section 2103 HUTA and the 2010 Gasoline Sales Tax – Excise Tax Swap In March 2010 as a part of a special budget session called by Governor Schwarzenegger, the Legislature enacted a swap of state sales taxes on gasoline for a gasoline excise tax. Intended to be “revenue neutral,” the fuel tax swap provided the Legislature with greater flexibility in the use of funds, in particular relieving the general fund from the cost of state transportation debt service payments. The fuel tax swap:
1. Repealed the state sales tax on gasoline (local rates including the Bradley Burns are NOT affected);
2. Increased the excise tax on gasoline by 17.322 cents and added an annual adjustment mechanism intended to ensure the new excise tax provides, over time, the same amount of revenues expected from the sales tax on gas (no more, no less);
3. Increased the sales tax on diesel by 1.75 percent and allocated 75 percent to local transit agencies and 25 percent to state transit programs. The excise tax on diesel was reduced from 18 cents to 13.6 cents.
Sales tax revenues from diesel must go to transit funding.
4. Provided for a specific allocation of the funds among state and local transportation needs.
Revenues from the new Section 2103 excise tax rate are now allocated as follows:
1. State transportation debt service;
2. Remainder allocated:
a. 44 percent to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); b. 12 percent State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP); c. 44 percent evenly split between cities and counties using current HUTA formulas.
Section 2103 funds are allocated to cities on a per capita basis and to counties 75 percent based on the proportion of registered vehicles and 25 percent based on the proportion of maintained county road miles.
City Population Annual Allocation
over 500,000 $ 20,000
100,000 to 500,000 $ 10,000
50,000 to 99.999 $ 7,500
25,000 to 49,999 $ 6,000
20,000 to 24,999 $ 5,000
15,000 to 19,999 $ 4,000
10,000 to 14,999 $ 3,000
5,000 to 9,999 $ 2,000
less than 5,000 $ 1,000
Streets & Highway Code §2107.5
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
The law included expressed legislative intent to fully replace the local streets and road funds cities and counties would have received under Proposition 42 state sales tax on gasoline with allocations from the new higher motor vehicle excise tax (HUTA) rate.
However, the swap created certain revenue effects related to the timing and receipt of revenues. In particular, the law provided that the new excise tax rate be adjusted annually by the BOE to garner an amount of revenues equal to what Prop42 would have provided in the prior year. Thus, the annual Sec 2103 funds were always “looking backward.” If the Section 2103 amounts generated less than Prop42 would have, the difference was made up until the following year.
In the years following the swap, there were a number of snafus and changes in interpretation of the Section 2103 allocation. In FY2011-12 SCO allocated more money to cities and counties and did not fully backfill state transportation programs for weight fees that were used for debt service and loans that those funds would have otherwise received. This was contrary to the Legislature’s intention, but the statute was not clear. The statute was clarified in the 2013 budget to clarify the original intent of the weight fee swap to fully backfill state transportation funds. [Streets & Highways Code 2103 (a)(1)(D)].
The Section 2103 Local Streets and Roads allocation to cities and counties have varied and declined dramatically and, due to BOE’s failure to enact a rate increase in 2018, fell to $244 million for FY2018-19, about 5 percent down from prior year.
Changes to HUTA Allocated Rates, Including the Variable Rate by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall)
In addition to increasing various fuel and motor vehicle registration taxes, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) removed BOE’s discretionary rate setting role over the Section 2103 variable rate and reset the variable rate at 17.3 cents per gallon on July 1, 2019, up from the current 11.7 cents. This adjustment more than doubled Section 2103 revenue allocations for FY2019-20 over the prior year.
With regard to diesel fuel taxes, SB1 also eliminated the price-based adjustment mechanism applied to the diesel fuel tax rate.
On July 1, 2020, and every July 1 thereafter, the gasoline and diesel fuel excise tax rates including the 18 cent per gallon base rate, the 17.3 percent per gallon rate, the diesel fuel excise tax rate and vehicle registration taxes are increased by the change in the California Consumer Price Index.
Streets & Highways Code Section 2103 Variable Gas Tax Allocations to Cities and Counties
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Effective Date Base Rate Sec2103 SB1 Rate Total
July 1, 2015 $ 0.180 $ 0.120 $ 0.300
July 1, 2016 $ 0.180 $ 0.098 $ 0.278
July 1, 2017 $ 0.180 $ 0.117 $ 0.297
Nov 1, 2017* $ 0.180 $ 0.117 $ 0.120 $ 0.417
July 1, 2019 $ 0.180 $ 0.173 $ 0.120 $ 0.473
July 1, 2020 $ 0.192 $ 0.185 $ 0.128 $ 0.505
July 1, 2021 $ 0.194 $ 0.187 $ 0.130 $ 0.511
July 1, 2022 $ 0.205 $ 0.197 $ 0.137 $ 0.539
July 1, 2023 $ 0.220 $ 0.212 $ 0.147 $ 0.579
July 1, 2024 $ 0.228 $ 0.219 $ 0.152 $ 0.599
California Gasoline Excise Tax Rates - Per Gallon
Effective Date Base Rate SB1 Rate Total
July 1, 2017 $ 0.160 $ 0.160
Nov 1, 2017* $ 0.160 $ 0.200 $ 0.360
July 1, 2019 $ 0.160 $ 0.200 $ 0.360
July 1, 2020 $ 0.171 $ 0.214 $ 0.385
July 1, 2021 $ 0.173 $ 0.216 $ 0.389
July 1, 2022 $ 0.182 $ 0.228 $ 0.410
July 1, 2023 $ 0.196 $ 0.245 $ 0.441
July 1, 2024 $ 0.202 $ 0.252 $ 0.454
California Diesel Excise Tax Rates
Wt Fees ~$1.7 billion
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(1)
22%
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(3)(C)
22%
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(3)(C)
56%
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(3)(A-B)
51.2%
Str&Hw ys §2108
22.6% (i)
Str&Hw ys §2104
14.6%(i)
Str&Hw ys §2107
Counties (iv)
Cities (v)
State
Highway
Account
Allocation of Gasoline Excise Tax Revenues
59.9¢
Per Gal11.4¢
§2105
11.4¢
§2104, §2106,
§2107,§2108
77% (iii) Str&Hw ys §2105
11.5% Str&Hw ys §2105b
11.5% Str&Hw ys §2105a
11.5% (i),(ii)
Str&Hw ys §2106
(i) The 4.39¢ local share of diesel fuel tax is allocated 1.8¢ to counties and 2.59¢ to cities. (ii) Str&Hw y Code §2106 funds are distributed based on registered vehicles, assessed property valuation, and population.
(iii) A portion of funds in State Highw ay Account is allocated among counties and cities for Regional Transportation Improvement Programs.
(iv) County apportionments are based on numbers of registered v ehicles and county road mileage.
(v) City apportionments are based on population.
(vi) Beginning July 1, 2020 and annually thereafter, these rates are subject to an annual cost-of-living adjustment.
Cities and
Counties
21.9¢
§2103
Transportation
Debt Service
(State General
Re
m
a
i
n
d
e
r
t
o
.
.
.
Wt Fee Offset ~$1.2 billion
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(1)
15.2¢
§2036
Road
Maint.
and
Rehab.
Account
Rev&Tax §7360(a)
Rev&Tax §7360(b)
Rev&Tax §7360(c)
Highway Users Tax Acount
Rates effective July 1, 2024
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Use of Funds: HUTA
The use of local Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funds is restricted by Article XIX of the California State Constitution and by Streets and Highways Code Section 2101. All Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funds allocated from the Highway Users Tax Account must be expended for the following:
(a) The research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance, and operation of public streets and highways (and their related public facilities for nonmotorized traffic), including the mitigation of their environmental effects, the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes. (b) The research and planning for exclusive public mass transit guideways (and their related fixed facilities), the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes.
(c) The construction and improvement of exclusive public mass transit guideways (and their related fixed facilities), including the mitigation of their environmental effects, the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes, and the maintenance of the structures and the immediate right-of-way for the public mass transit guideways. (d) The payment of principal and interest on voter-approved bonds issued for the purposes specified above.
Three Year State General Fund TCRF Loan Repayment Funds SB1 stipulated the repayment of $706 million by the state General Fund to transportation funds over three fiscal years: 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20. Under SB1, $75 million was allocated to local streets and roads from repayments of Transportation Congestion Relief Funds (TCRF) in each of these three years. These funds were allocated half to cities and half to counties with the city funds allocated among cities on a per capita basis, the county funds allocated among counties based on numbers of registered vehicles and county road mileage.
These TCRF revenues may be deposited in local HUTA funds.3 However, these TCRF funds carry slightly different use requirements than HUTA funds. TCRF funds may be expended only for street and highway maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction or storm damage repair. For these purposes, “Maintenance” means patching and/or overlay and sealing. “Reconstruction” includes any overlay, sealing or widening of the roadway, if the widening is necessary to bring the roadway width to the state minimum standards, but does not include widening for the purpose of traffic capacity.
“Storm damage repair” is repair or reconstruction of local streets and highways and related drainage improvements that have been damaged due to winter storms and flooding, and construction of drainage improvements to mitigate future roadway flooding and damage problems, in those jurisdictions that have been declared disaster areas by the President of the United States.
3 Note that the “loan repayment” is between the state general fund and state transportation funds. From an accounting standpoint this is NOT a debt repayment to local agencies, it is simply revenue.
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
Revenue Allocations – Streets & Highways Code Sec 2031 “RMRA” The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) represented a significant additional investment in California’s transportation systems of over $5 billion per year. The Act increased per gallon fuel excise taxes, diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration taxes, stabilized the problematic price-based fuel tax rates and provided for inflationary adjustments to rates in future years. The Act is more than doubling local streets and road funds allocated through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) which it established.
The RMRA receives funds4 from the following new taxes imposed under the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017:
A 12 cent per gallon increase to the gasoline excise tax effective November 1, 2017. A 20 cent per gallon increase to the diesel fuel excise tax effective November 1, 2017, half of which will be allocated to Trade Corridors Enhancement Account (TCEA) with the remaining half to the RMRA. A new vehicle registration tax called the “transportation improvement fee,” effective January 1, 2018, based on the market value of the vehicle.
An additional new $100 vehicle registration tax on zero emission vehicles model year 2020 and later effective July 1, 2020.
Annual rate increases to these taxes every July 1 (January 1 for the registration fees) for the change in the California Consumer Price Index. The first adjustment made on July 1, 2020 covered CPI change for two years: November 1, 2017 through November 12, 2019.
4 In addition, funds from a 4 percent increase in the diesel sales tax to 5.75 percent from the prior 1.75 percent effective November 1, 2017 are allocated to the Public Transportation Account.
Vehicle Value Jan 2018 Jan 2020 Jan 2021 Jan 2022 Jan 2023 Jan 2024 0 - $4,999 $ 25 $ 27 $ 27 $ 28 $ 29 $ 32
$5,000 - $24,999 $ 52 $ 54 $ 55 $ 56 $ 59 $ 65
$25,000 - $34,999 $ 105 $ 107 $ 110 $ 112 $ 118 $ 129 $35,000 - $59,999 $ 157 $ 161 $ 165 $ 168 $ 177 $ 194 $60,000 & over $ 183 $ 188 $ 192 $ 196 $ 206 $ 227
Jan 2020 Jan 2021 Jan 2022 Jan 2023 Jan 2024
ZEV vehicle* $ 100 $ 101 $ 103 $ 108 $ 118
*2020 or later models
SB1 Transportation Improvement Fee
SB1 Road Improvement Fee (ZEV)
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
The Road Repair and Accountability Act directs the State Controller to allocate, on a monthly basis, fifty percent of the revenues in the RMRA to the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOP) in the State Highway Account and half to cities and counties. But there are a series of specific program allocations, subject to appropriation in the annual state budget, to be taken out first:
1. Administrative costs.
2. $200 million for the State-Local-Partnership Program for existing and aspiring self-help jurisdictions.
3. $100 million annually for the Active Transportation Program for the purpose of encouraging increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking.
4. $400 million for state bridge and culvert maintenance and rehabilitation.
5. $25 million for the state’s Freeway Service Patrol program.
6. $5 million for five years through FY 2021-22 for pre-apprenticeship training programs of the California Workforce Development Board.
7. $25 million for local planning grants to encourage local and regional planning.
8. $7 million for transportation research and transportation-related workforce education, training, and development including $5 million to the University of California and $2 million to the California State University.
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Use of Funds: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Section 2030] The use of RMRA local streets and roads funds is similar but, not identical, to HUTA use rules. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2030, RMRA local streets and roads allocations must be used for projects “that include, but are not limited to,” the following
Road maintenance and rehabilitation
Safety projects
Railroad grade separations
Traffic control devices
Complete street components, “including active transportation purposes, pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, and drainage and storm-water capture projects in conjunction with any other allowable project.”
RMRA funds may also be used to satisfy a match requirement for projects eligible for state or federal funds.
SB1 also contains non-obligatory intent language regarding the use of funds. “To the extent possible and cost effective,” cities and counties are to use a use:
advanced recycling techniques that reduce greenhouse gas emissions; automotive technologies, ZEV fueling, infrastructure-to-vehicle; communications autonomous vehicle systems;
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
resiliency re climate change, fires, floods, sea level rise; and complete street elements, access for bicycles, pedestrians.
If a city or county has an average Pavement Condition Index that meets or exceeds 80, the city or county may spend its RMRA funds on transportation priorities other than these. [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2037] Maintenance of Effort: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2036] The Road Repair and Accountability Act contains a local agency maintenance of effort (MOE) requirement that applies to funds allocated through the RMRA. The Act states that the MOE requirement is to ensure that these new roads funds do not supplant existing levels of city and county general revenue spending on streets and roads. The MOE for the receipt of RMRA funds state that a city or county must maintain general fund spending for street, road, and highway purposes at no less than average of 2009–10, 2010–11, and 2011–12 years. In making this calculation an agency may exclude one-time funds. A city or county that fails to comply in a particular year may make it up with in additional expenditures in the following year.
The Act provides that the State Controller may perform audits to ensure compliance with these MOE rules. If the State Controller determines that a city or county has not met its MOE, the agency will be required to reimburse the state for the funds it received during that fiscal year. However, a city or county that fails to comply in a particular fiscal year may expend during that fiscal year and the following fiscal year a total amount that is sufficient to comply. Any funds withheld or returned as a result of a failure to comply will be reapportioned to the other counties and cities whose expenditures are in compliance.
For further guidance, see the State Controller’s “Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties.”
Spending Plans and Reports: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2034] The Road Repair and Accountability Act stipulates that, prior to receiving RMRA funds in a fiscal year, a city or county must submit to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) a project list pursuant to an adopted budget. The list must include for each project: description, location, schedule, useful life. [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2034(a)]
The Road Repair and Accountability Act also requires that a city or county submit to the CTC an annual report of project completion in order to receive RMRA funds. The report must include descriptions of all projects for which RMRA funds were expended including: description, location, funds expended, completion date, estimated useful life of the project.
There are no additional use or reporting requirements on Highway Users Tax Account funds (Streets and Highways Code Sec 2103-2107) or on the three year transportation loan repayment funds.
Budgeting and Accounting for RMRA Funds: The ~60 Day Delay The allocation of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) revenues to cities and counties takes many weeks. It takes the State Controller’s Office roughly 30 to 60 days from the time of revenue collection by the state, through the various statutory set asides to distribute the funds to cities and counties in monthly allocations. Consequently, the estimates shown in this report are for revenues collected for July through June are not received on a cash basis by local agencies until September through August. That is, for example, the FY2022-23 figure for your agency is revenues collected in and for July 2022 through June 2023 but distributed in
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
monthly allocations September 2022 through August 2023. Cities and counties thus have two choices in the budgeting and accounting of RMRA revenues:
1) apply a 60 day accrual policy to RMRA funds (recommended); or 2) adjust RMRA budgets (especially in FY2017-18) to reflect a distributed cash basis.
Local Streets and Roads (HUTA and RMRA) Revenue Estimates for FY2023-24 and FY2024-25
We have computed revenue estimates for each city and county using a model reflecting the local allocation formulas, latest population figures used by the State Controller for allocations and estimates by the state Department of Finance (DOF) of statewide HUTA and RMRA tax revenues provided with the Governor’s Proposed 2024-25 Budget (released January 10, 2024) and analyses of SB1(Beall), The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.
Fuel consumption was sharply down during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic but has largely recovered to its prior, slightly declining trajectory. Recently, fuel prices have increased steeply but the price of fuel no longer has a direct effect on local streets and roads revenues because all rates are per gallon, regardless of price.
Despite lower fuel consumption, scheduled rate increases stipulated in SB1 have kept local allocations of revenue growing at a modest pace. Total LSR allocations (including HUTA, TCRF, and RMRA) in up 8.3 percent in 2021-22 and 6.7 percent in FY2022-23. The Department of Finance projects total LSR allocations to cities and counties in 2023-24 will be 7.4 percent above the prior year. For the budget year FY2024-25, DOF estimates total statewide local streets and roads allocations will grow 4.1 percent.
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
HUTA (Highway Users Tax Account)
Revenues allocated to cities and counties through HUTA under Sections 2103-2107 of the Streets and Highways Code are derived from per gallon rates. As described above, these rates are adjusted annually on July
1. Revenue changes depend on the combined effects of 1) these rate adjustments, 2) taxable gallonage, and 3) the relative change of statutory transfers including the “weight fee offset” that pays state transportation bond debt.
Statewide fuel consumption (gallons) had been relatively flat in recent years. The COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions caused a steep decline in fuel consumption in the spring of 2020. The effects of this are expected to ease up gradually as restrictions are lifted and travel resumes. Sec2104-2108 HUTA allocations (not including RMRA or the sec2103 variable fuel taxes) dropped 6.5 percent in FY2019-20 from the prior FY2018-19 year. But this drop-off was more than offset by the doubling of the Sec2103 allocations due to the reset of the formerly price-based rate. FY2019-20 contained the most dramatic fiscal and economic effects of the pandemic, those during the months of April through June 2020.
With a recovery in fuel consumption as the COVID effects eased and with additional rate adjustments kicking in each July 1, total HUTA revenue grew 8.3 percent in FY 2021-22 and 8.7 percent in FY2022-23. DOF now estimates 7.4 percent growth in current year FY2023-24 and 1.6 percent growth in budget year FY2024-25.
RMRA (Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account)5
The Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB1) taxes that provide funding to cities and counties through the RMRA began on November 1, 2017 when the new per-gallon fuel excise taxes took effect. On January 1, 2018, the new vehicle registration tax, the “Transportation Improvement Fee,” took effect. Cities, counties and other recipients of these revenues saw the first full year of these revenues in FY2018-19. A $100 zero emission vehicle registration tax (“Road Improvement Fee”) began on July 1, 2020.
DOF estimates FY2023-24 RMRA revenues will be 7.4 percent higher than FY2022-23 actuals and that FY2024- 25 revenues will grow by 6.9 percent over the current year.
Why does city/county RMRA growth differ from city/county HUTA growth? Under SB1, various fixed-amount statutory allocations are made from the new SB1 tax rates prior to the city and county allocations.
Your Mileage Revenues May Vary
An individual city’s allocations will of course also be affected by change in the city’s population relative to the change in state population. Changes for allocations to counties will be affected other factors in the allocation rules including relative numbers of vehicle registrations, assessed values and maintained road miles.
5 Note that RMRA revenues are delayed 60 days from collection to allocation. That is, the revenues for a July 1 to June 30 fiscal year are allocated September 1 through August 31. These are spendable in the fiscal year because your accounting staff “accrues” them back into your fiscal year.
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
California Local Streets and Roads Program - State Funds to Cities and Counties
Looking Ahead: Long Term Estimates of Local Streets and Roads Funding With the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, we can expect stable, modest year over year growth in local streets and roads revenues in future years. While fuel consumption may remain flat or in slight decline, annual cost of living adjustments will help to maintain revenues.
Due to complicated statutory transfers from these revenues before the city and county allocations are made (including the $1.3 billion transfer for state transportation debt service), actual growth in funding allocated to cities and counties varies somewhat among the various categories of local streets and roads allocations and will not exactly mirror total tax collections. Taking all these factors into account, for the purposes of long-term transportation program planning, we estimate transportation allocations to cities and counties will increase in outyears at the following growth rates:
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 FY24-25 FY25-26 M
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
§2103
cities&counties
§2104
counties
§2106
§2107
cities
estimated projected >>>>
Road
Maintenance
&
Rehabilitation
AccountTCRF loan
repayment
H.U.T.A.
§2105
cities&counties
Estimated Annual Revenue Growth Rate
over prior year
2025-26 2026-27 Beyond
HUTA 2103 2.4% 0.8% 1.1%
HUTA 2104 2.4% 0.8% 1.1%
HUTA 2105 2.4% 0.8% 1.1%
HUTA 2106 2.4% 0.8% 1.1%
HUTA 2107 2.4% 0.8% 1.1%
RMRA 2.4% 0.8% 1.1%
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Your Mileage Revenues May Vary
Allocations to each particular city also will be affected by annual changes in the city’s population relative to the change in state population in cities. The current forecast for California population, provided by the Demographics Unit of the California Department of Finance is as follows:6
If you think your city’s population growth will be significantly different from the statewide average in cities, then you should adjust accordingly. For example, the City of Agartha’s planning department estimates the city will see average annual residential population growth of 1.5 percent annually over the next ten years. The city’s estimated HUTA 2105 allocation for FY2023-24 is $381,200. The long term projection of Section 2105 revenue would be:
$381,200 x Sec2105 growth x Agartha Population Growth ÷ Statewide City Population Growth So, for 2024-25, the city would estimate $381,200 x 1.014 x 1.015 ÷ 1.0055 = $390,189 And long term …
Changes for allocations to counties will be affected by other factors in the allocation rules, including relative numbers of vehicle registrations, assessed values and maintained road miles.
mjgc
ATTACHMENTS:
A) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual City Revenues – FY2023-24 B) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual City Revenues – FY2024-25 C) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual County Revenues – FY2023-24 (from CSAC) D) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual County Revenues – FY2024-25 (from CSAC)
6 See http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/projections/ . California population in cities estimated by author based on recent historic trend of proportion of population in cities.
California 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
Population 39,185,605 39,388,838 39,593,125 39,798,472 40,004,883 40,212,365 40,420,923 40,630,563 Population in Cities 32,713,003 32,892,492 33,072,965 33,254,428 33,436,888 33,620,348 33,804,815 33,990,294 percent change 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036
Population 40,825,471 41,011,197 41,197,768 41,385,188 41,573,460 41,762,589 41,952,578 Population in Cities 34,163,552 34,329,226 34,495,703 34,662,987 34,831,083 34,999,994 35,169,724 percent change 0.51% 0.48% 0.48% 0.48% 0.48% 0.48% 0.48% 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 HUTA Sec2015 381,200$
2105 growth 1.4% 1.1% 0.6% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
Agartha pop 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5%
Cities pop 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55%
HUTA Sec2015 390,189$ 398,208$ 404,382$ 412,421$ 420,619$ 428,981$
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct
ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 693,852 479,786 268,833 655,324 7,500 2,105,295 1,886,962 3,992,256 ALBANY 197,376 136,482 79,908 186,416 5,000 605,181 536,772 1,141,953 BERKELEY 1,116,651 772,144 429,723 1,054,646 10,000 3,383,163 3,036,784 6,419,947 DUBLIN 653,320 451,759 253,410 617,043 7,500 1,983,032 1,776,734 3,759,766 EMERYVILLE 111,708 77,244 47,309 105,505 3,000 344,766 303,796 648,562 FREMONT 2,024,139 1,399,655 775,052 1,911,743 10,000 6,120,588 5,504,737 11,625,325 HAYWARD 1,443,474 998,136 554,090 1,363,321 10,000 4,369,021 3,925,594 8,294,614 LIVERMORE 772,018 533,837 298,579 729,150 7,500 2,341,084 2,099,540 4,440,623 NEWARK 417,808 288,906 163,790 394,608 6,000 1,271,111 1,136,247 2,407,358 OAKLAND 3,813,205 2,636,761 1,455,850 3,601,466 10,000 11,517,282 10,370,185 21,887,467 PIEDMONT 99,119 68,539 42,518 93,615 3,000 306,792 269,559 576,351 PLEASANTON 702,004 485,423 271,936 663,023 7,500 2,129,885 1,909,132 4,039,017 SAN LEANDRO 799,820 553,061 309,158 755,408 7,500 2,424,947 2,175,147 4,600,094 UNION CITY 616,574 426,350 239,427 582,337 7,500 1,872,188 1,676,802 3,548,990
ALPINE COUNTY
AMADOR COUNTY
AMADOR 1,761 1,217 5,657 1,663 1,000 11,299 4,788 16,087 IONE 77,911 53,874 42,744 73,585 2,000 250,115 211,884 461,999 JACKSON 44,643 30,870 26,542 42,164 2,000 146,218 121,408 267,626 PLYMOUTH 9,411 6,508 9,383 8,888 1,000 35,190 25,594 60,784 SUTTER CREEK 23,268 16,089 16,132 21,976 1,000 78,465 63,278 141,742
BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS 17,519 12,114 12,177 16,546 1,000 59,357 47,644 107,000 CHICO 945,448 653,760 402,921 892,950 10,000 2,905,080 2,571,190 5,476,270 GRIDLEY 66,449 45,948 32,781 62,759 2,000 209,938 180,712 390,650 OROVILLE 175,464 121,330 78,686 165,720 4,000 545,200 477,181 1,022,381 PARADISE 80,482 55,652 38,690 108,429 2,000 285,253 218,875 504,128
CALAVERAS COUNTY
ANGELS CAMP 32,142 22,225 28,545 30,357 1,000 114,270 87,411 201,681
COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA 56,589 39,130 20,372 53,447 2,000 171,539 153,897 325,436 WILLIAMS 49,018 33,895 18,289 46,296 2,000 149,499 133,307 282,806 TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ANTIOCH 1,016,299 702,752 421,738 959,867 10,000 3,110,656 2,763,873 5,874,529 BRENTWOOD 567,943 392,722 237,799 536,407 7,500 1,742,372 1,544,548 3,286,920 CLAYTON 97,402 67,352 44,759 91,994 3,000 304,508 264,890 569,398 CONCORD 1,105,365 764,340 458,277 1,043,987 10,000 3,381,968 3,006,090 6,388,059 DANVILLE 384,398 265,804 162,500 363,053 6,000 1,181,756 1,045,388 2,227,144 EL CERRITO 228,373 157,916 98,490 215,692 6,000 706,471 621,071 1,327,541 HERCULES 231,507 160,083 99,776 218,652 6,000 716,018 629,594 1,345,611 LAFAYETTE 223,813 154,762 96,619 211,385 6,000 692,579 608,669 1,301,248 MARTINEZ 330,459 228,506 140,371 312,109 6,000 1,017,445 898,698 1,916,143 MORAGA 152,055 105,143 67,181 143,612 4,000 471,990 413,520 885,511 OAKLEY 396,116 273,907 167,307 374,120 6,000 1,217,450 1,077,255 2,294,705 ORINDA 171,845 118,828 75,300 162,303 4,000 532,276 467,341 999,617 PINOLE 166,686 115,261 73,183 157,431 4,000 516,561 453,311 969,872 PITTSBURG 671,200 464,123 280,161 633,930 7,500 2,056,914 1,825,360 3,882,273 PLEASANT HILL 303,811 210,079 129,439 286,941 6,000 936,269 826,227 1,762,496 RICHMOND 1,020,279 705,504 423,370 963,625 10,000 3,122,778 2,774,694 5,897,472 SAN PABLO 283,510 196,042 121,110 267,767 6,000 874,428 771,017 1,645,445 SAN RAMON 744,736 514,971 310,329 703,383 7,500 2,280,919 2,025,344 4,306,264 WALNUT CREEK 618,916 427,969 258,711 584,549 7,500 1,897,645 1,683,170 3,580,815
DEL NORTE COUNTY
CRESCENT CITY 59,406 41,078 24,907 56,108 2,000 183,500 161,558 345,058
EL DORADO COUNTY
PLACERVILLE 95,175 65,812 66,766 89,890 3,000 320,643 258,833 579,477 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 188,616 130,425 127,603 1,223,331 5,000 1,674,974 512,950 2,187,924 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 2 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code
FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS 1,096,244 758,033 384,193 1,035,373 10,000 3,283,843 2,981,287 6,265,129 COALINGA 159,054 109,983 59,846 150,222 4,000 483,104 432,554 915,658 FIREBAUGH 74,786 51,713 30,682 70,633 2,000 229,815 203,384 433,200 FOWLER 63,104 43,635 26,639 59,600 2,000 194,978 171,614 366,592 FRESNO 4,784,095 3,308,114 1,660,499 4,518,446 20,000 14,291,154 13,010,566 27,301,721 HURON 53,975 37,322 23,480 50,977 2,000 167,754 146,786 314,540 KERMAN 149,264 103,213 56,458 140,976 4,000 453,911 405,931 859,842 KINGSBURG 113,258 78,316 43,997 106,969 3,000 345,539 308,009 653,548 MENDOTA 110,810 76,623 43,150 104,657 3,000 338,240 301,354 639,594 ORANGE COVE 84,673 58,550 34,104 79,971 2,000 259,297 230,271 489,568 PARLIER 128,259 88,689 49,188 121,137 3,000 390,273 348,806 739,079 REEDLEY 223,443 154,507 82,130 211,036 6,000 677,115 607,663 1,284,778 SANGER 233,972 161,787 85,774 220,980 6,000 708,513 636,297 1,344,811 SAN JOAQUIN 32,564 22,518 16,070 30,756 1,000 102,908 88,560 191,468 SELMA 217,597 150,465 80,107 205,515 5,000 658,684 591,766 1,250,449
GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND 72,647 50,234 27,013 68,613 2,000 220,507 197,567 418,073 WILLOWS 56,325 38,948 22,022 53,198 2,000 172,493 153,179 325,671
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
ARCATA 164,521 113,763 80,945 155,385 4,000 518,614 447,422 966,036 BLUE LAKE 10,599 7,329 9,706 10,011 1,000 38,645 28,826 67,471 EUREKA 237,493 164,222 114,719 224,306 6,000 746,740 645,874 1,392,614 FERNDALE 12,263 8,480 10,476 11,582 1,000 43,801 33,351 77,152 FORTUNA 110,229 76,222 55,817 104,108 3,000 349,376 299,773 649,150 RIO DELL 29,818 20,618 18,600 28,162 1,000 98,198 81,090 179,289 TRINIDAD 2,703 1,869 6,051 2,553 1,000 14,175 7,350 21,525
IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 242,441 167,643 104,878 228,979 6,000 749,941 659,329 1,409,270 CALEXICO 340,909 235,732 145,524 321,979 6,000 1,050,144 927,117 1,977,261 CALIPATRIA 58,200 40,244 28,825 54,969 2,000 184,238 158,278 342,516 EL CENTRO 394,593 272,854 167,685 372,682 6,000 1,213,813 1,073,113 2,286,926 HOLTVILLE 48,675 33,658 24,893 45,972 2,000 155,197 132,373 287,571 IMPERIAL 189,241 130,857 82,917 178,733 5,000 586,748 514,650 1,101,398 WESTMORLAND 17,783 12,297 12,141 16,796 1,000 60,016 48,362 108,379
INYO COUNTY
BISHOP 34,087 23,571 19,381 32,195 1,000 110,234 92,702 202,936 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 3 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code
KERN COUNTY
ARVIN 173,861 120,222 52,328 164,207 4,000 514,619 472,824 987,442 BAKERSFIELD 3,595,132 2,485,968 987,599 3,395,503 10,000 10,474,201 9,777,126 20,251,327 CALIFORNIA CITY 132,176 91,398 40,933 124,837 4,000 393,344 359,460 752,804 DELANO 455,381 314,888 129,287 430,095 7,500 1,337,151 1,238,430 2,575,581 MARICOPA 9,024 6,240 7,267 8,523 1,000 32,053 24,540 56,593 MCFARLAND 124,817 86,308 38,921 117,886 3,000 370,932 339,445 710,377 RIDGECREST 245,487 169,750 71,909 231,856 6,000 725,001 667,613 1,392,614 SHAFTER 187,674 129,773 56,104 177,253 5,000 555,805 510,388 1,066,193 TAFT 76,564 52,943 25,730 72,313 2,000 229,551 208,221 437,771 TEHACHAPI 114,992 79,515 36,235 108,607 3,000 342,349 312,726 655,075 WASCO 238,717 165,068 70,058 225,462 6,000 705,305 649,202 1,354,507
KINGS COUNTY
AVENAL 120,600 83,393 40,115 113,903 3,000 361,011 327,977 688,987 CORCORAN 190,386 131,648 60,550 179,814 5,000 567,398 517,762 1,085,160 HANFORD 518,467 358,511 156,622 489,678 7,500 1,530,778 1,409,996 2,940,774 LEMOORE 237,969 164,551 74,484 224,755 6,000 707,758 647,167 1,354,925
LAKE COUNTY
CLEARLAKE 148,560 102,726 58,422 140,311 4,000 454,019 404,015 858,034 LAKEPORT 43,727 30,237 20,583 41,299 1,000 136,846 118,918 255,764
LASSEN COUNTY
SUSANVILLE 141,825 98,070 47,745 216,537 4,000 508,176 385,700 893,876
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 178,166 123,199 74,117 168,273 5,000 548,755 484,531 1,033,286 ALHAMBRA 727,314 502,924 287,766 686,928 7,500 2,212,432 1,977,964 4,190,396 ARCADIA 500,869 346,342 199,666 473,057 7,500 1,527,434 1,362,137 2,889,571 ARTESIA 145,153 100,371 61,273 137,093 4,000 447,889 394,750 842,639 AVALON 30,319 20,965 16,596 28,636 1,000 97,517 82,455 179,972 AZUSA 444,236 307,181 177,633 419,569 7,500 1,356,118 1,208,120 2,564,238 BALDWIN PARK 634,357 438,646 251,600 599,133 7,500 1,931,237 1,725,164 3,656,401 BELL 300,588 207,851 121,746 283,897 6,000 920,083 817,464 1,737,547 BELLFLOWER 694,424 480,181 274,970 655,864 7,500 2,112,939 1,888,518 4,001,457 BELL GARDENS 347,001 239,945 139,803 327,733 6,000 1,060,481 943,684 2,004,165 BEVERLY HILLS 287,955 199,116 116,831 271,966 6,000 881,868 783,108 1,664,975 BRADBURY 8,099 5,600 7,951 7,650 1,000 30,300 22,026 52,327 BURBANK 943,758 652,591 371,975 891,353 10,000 2,869,678 2,566,593 5,436,271 CALABASAS 204,524 141,425 84,371 193,167 5,000 628,487 556,213 1,184,700 CARSON 826,284 571,360 326,270 780,402 7,500 2,511,816 2,247,116 4,758,932 CERRITOS 434,684 300,576 173,916 410,547 6,000 1,325,724 1,182,143 2,507,867 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 4 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code CLAREMONT 329,675 227,964 133,062 311,369 6,000 1,008,071 896,567 1,904,638 COMMERCE 108,970 75,351 47,196 102,919 3,000 337,436 296,350 633,786 COMPTON 846,197 585,130 334,018 799,210 7,500 2,572,055 2,301,272 4,873,327 COVINA 451,754 312,380 180,558 426,669 7,500 1,378,861 1,228,566 2,607,427 CUDAHY 200,536 138,667 82,820 189,401 5,000 616,424 545,367 1,161,791 CULVER CITY 356,112 246,245 143,348 336,338 6,000 1,088,043 968,464 2,056,507 DIAMOND BAR 483,940 334,636 193,080 457,068 7,500 1,476,223 1,316,097 2,792,320 DOWNEY 1,003,173 693,676 395,090 947,469 10,000 3,049,409 2,728,176 5,777,585 DUARTE 200,686 138,770 82,878 189,542 5,000 616,876 545,774 1,162,650 EL MONTE 960,758 664,346 378,588 907,409 10,000 2,921,102 2,612,825 5,533,927 EL SEGUNDO 152,284 105,301 64,047 143,828 4,000 469,460 414,143 883,603 GARDENA 536,339 370,868 213,466 506,557 7,500 1,634,730 1,458,598 3,093,327 GLENDALE 1,725,100 1,192,875 675,960 1,629,309 10,000 5,233,243 4,691,487 9,924,730 GLENDORA 462,239 319,630 184,637 436,572 7,500 1,410,578 1,257,081 2,667,659 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 122,810 84,921 52,580 115,990 3,000 379,300 333,986 713,286 HAWTHORNE 774,862 535,803 306,265 731,836 7,500 2,356,265 2,107,273 4,463,538 HERMOSA BEACH 173,571 120,021 72,329 163,933 4,000 533,853 472,034 1,005,887 HIDDEN HILLS 15,239 10,537 10,729 14,393 1,000 51,898 41,443 93,341 HUNTINGTON PARK 481,730 333,108 192,220 454,981 7,500 1,469,539 1,310,087 2,779,626 INDUSTRY 3,794 2,624 6,276 3,584 1,000 17,278 10,319 27,597 INGLEWOOD 955,573 660,761 376,571 902,512 10,000 2,905,416 2,598,723 5,504,139 IRWINDALE 13,214 9,137 9,941 12,480 1,000 45,773 35,936 81,709 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 180,887 125,080 75,175 170,842 5,000 556,984 491,929 1,048,913 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 49,793 34,431 24,172 47,028 2,000 157,424 135,414 292,838 LAKEWOOD 724,682 501,104 286,742 684,442 7,500 2,204,470 1,970,805 4,175,275 LA MIRADA 433,548 299,791 173,475 409,474 6,000 1,322,288 1,179,055 2,501,343 LANCASTER 1,553,818 1,074,436 609,322 1,467,538 10,000 4,715,114 4,225,678 8,940,792 LA PUENTE 334,702 231,440 135,018 316,117 6,000 1,023,277 910,238 1,933,515 LA VERNE 289,566 200,230 117,457 273,487 6,000 886,741 787,489 1,674,230 LAWNDALE 279,847 193,509 113,676 264,308 6,000 857,341 761,057 1,618,398 LOMITA 184,320 127,454 76,511 174,085 5,000 567,370 501,266 1,068,636 LONG BEACH 4,086,397 2,825,668 1,594,637 3,859,488 10,000 12,376,190 11,113,142 23,489,332 LOS ANGELES 34,299,308 23,717,342 13,349,147 32,394,746 20,000 103,780,542 93,278,537 197,059,079 LYNWOOD 603,703 417,450 239,674 570,181 7,500 1,838,509 1,641,799 3,480,308 MALIBU 94,541 65,374 41,582 89,292 3,000 293,788 257,109 550,898 MANHATTAN BEACH 312,280 215,936 126,294 294,939 6,000 955,449 849,258 1,804,707 MAYWOOD 221,277 153,009 90,889 208,990 6,000 680,166 601,774 1,281,939 MONROVIA 333,311 230,479 134,477 314,803 6,000 1,019,070 906,455 1,925,525 MONTEBELLO 551,754 381,528 219,463 521,116 7,500 1,681,360 1,500,519 3,181,880 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 5 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code MONTEREY PARK 537,518 371,684 213,925 507,671 7,500 1,638,298 1,461,806 3,100,104 NORWALK 910,428 629,544 359,007 859,874 10,000 2,768,853 2,475,950 5,244,804 PALMDALE 1,490,705 1,030,795 584,768 1,407,930 10,000 4,524,197 4,054,041 8,578,238 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 117,571 81,298 50,542 111,043 3,000 363,455 319,741 683,195 PARAMOUNT 470,840 325,577 187,983 444,696 7,500 1,436,596 1,280,472 2,717,068 PASADENA 1,230,631 850,958 483,584 1,162,297 10,000 3,737,470 3,346,756 7,084,226 PICO RIVERA 547,141 378,338 217,668 516,759 7,500 1,667,406 1,487,974 3,155,380 POMONA 1,340,332 926,815 526,264 1,265,906 10,000 4,069,316 3,645,093 7,714,410 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 372,637 257,671 149,776 351,945 6,000 1,138,030 1,013,402 2,151,432 REDONDO BEACH 618,379 427,598 245,384 584,042 7,500 1,882,902 1,681,710 3,564,612 ROLLING HILLS (2)
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 74,355 51,415 33,728 70,226 2,000 231,724 202,211 433,935 ROSEMEAD 450,046 311,199 179,893 425,056 7,500 1,373,694 1,223,921 2,597,616 SAN DIMAS 307,614 212,709 124,479 290,533 6,000 941,334 836,569 1,777,904 SAN FERNANDO 208,186 143,957 85,796 196,626 5,000 639,566 566,172 1,205,738 SAN GABRIEL 347,414 240,231 139,964 328,123 6,000 1,061,732 944,810 2,006,542 SAN MARINO 110,493 76,404 47,788 104,358 3,000 342,043 300,492 642,535 SANTA CLARITA 2,030,618 1,404,135 794,824 1,917,862 10,000 6,157,439 5,522,359 11,679,798 SANTA FE SPRINGS 164,538 113,775 68,815 155,402 4,000 506,530 447,470 954,000 SANTA MONICA 821,644 568,152 324,465 776,020 7,500 2,497,781 2,234,499 4,732,280 SIERRA MADRE 98,415 68,052 43,089 92,950 3,000 305,506 267,644 573,150 SIGNAL HILL 103,556 71,607 45,089 97,806 3,000 321,058 281,626 602,684 SOUTH EL MONTE 172,030 118,956 71,729 162,478 4,000 529,193 467,844 997,037 SOUTH GATE 815,455 563,872 322,058 770,175 7,500 2,479,060 2,217,668 4,696,728 SOUTH PASADENA 237,379 164,143 97,154 224,198 6,000 728,874 645,563 1,374,436 TEMPLE CITY 321,602 222,382 129,921 303,745 6,000 983,651 874,613 1,858,263 TORRANCE 1,292,916 894,027 507,816 1,221,123 10,000 3,925,883 3,516,143 7,442,026 VERNON 1,858 1,284 5,523 1,754 1,000 11,419 5,052 16,471 WALNUT 250,355 173,116 102,202 236,454 6,000 768,127 680,853 1,448,980 WEST COVINA 964,931 667,232 380,212 911,350 10,000 2,933,725 2,624,173 5,557,898 WEST HOLLYWOOD 314,260 217,305 127,065 296,810 6,000 961,441 854,645 1,816,086 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 71,723 49,595 32,704 67,740 2,000 223,761 195,053 418,814 WHITTIER 773,990 535,200 305,926 731,013 7,500 2,353,629 2,104,903 4,458,531 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 6 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code
MADERA COUNTY
CHOWCHILLA 169,856 117,452 47,065 160,424 4,000 498,797 461,930 960,727 MADERA 578,094 399,741 148,647 545,994 7,500 1,679,976 1,572,153 3,252,129
MARIN COUNTY
BELVEDERE 18,690 12,924 12,857 17,652 1,000 63,123 50,828 113,951 CORTE MADERA 89,752 62,062 43,493 84,768 3,000 283,076 244,085 527,161 FAIRFAX 66,819 46,204 33,606 63,109 2,000 211,738 181,717 393,455 LARKSPUR 115,080 79,576 54,412 108,690 3,000 360,758 312,965 673,723 MILL VALLEY 124,315 85,961 58,394 117,412 3,000 389,082 338,080 727,162 NOVATO 467,821 323,489 206,483 441,844 7,500 1,447,137 1,272,260 2,719,396 ROSS 20,556 14,214 13,662 19,415 1,000 68,847 55,904 124,751 SAN ANSELMO 112,474 77,774 53,289 106,229 3,000 352,766 305,879 658,644 SAN RAFAEL 541,436 374,393 238,219 511,371 7,500 1,672,920 1,472,460 3,145,379 SAUSALITO 62,628 43,306 31,800 59,151 2,000 198,886 170,321 369,207 TIBURON 80,350 55,561 39,440 75,888 2,000 253,239 218,515 471,754
MARIPOSA COUNTY
MENDOCINO COUNTY
FORT BRAGG 62,179 42,996 31,767 58,727 2,000 197,670 169,100 366,770 POINT ARENA 4,050 2,800 6,556 3,825 1,000 18,231 11,013 29,244 UKIAH 146,174 101,077 68,196 138,057 4,000 457,505 397,527 855,032 WILLITS 43,551 30,115 23,688 41,133 1,000 139,487 118,439 257,927
MERCED COUNTY
ATWATER 279,522 193,284 90,741 264,000 6,000 833,547 760,172 1,593,718 DOS PALOS 51,008 35,271 20,483 48,175 2,000 156,937 138,718 295,655 GUSTINE 53,508 37,000 21,251 50,537 2,000 164,296 145,517 309,813 LIVINGSTON 125,512 86,789 43,390 118,543 3,000 377,234 341,336 718,570 LOS BANOS 416,822 288,225 132,955 393,677 6,000 1,237,678 1,133,566 2,371,243 MERCED 793,341 548,581 248,719 749,288 7,500 2,347,428 2,157,526 4,504,955
MODOC COUNTY
ALTURAS 23,884 16,515 15,354 24,039 1,000 80,792 64,954 145,746
MONO COUNTY
MAMMOTH LAKES 64,028 44,274 61,284 1,912,491 2,000 2,084,077 174,128 2,258,205 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 7 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code
MONTEREY COUNTY
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 27,846 19,255 13,019 26,299 1,000 87,419 75,727 163,147 DEL REY OAKS 13,883 9,600 8,898 13,112 1,000 46,494 37,756 84,250 GONZALES 75,147 51,963 26,982 70,974 2,000 227,066 204,366 431,432 GREENFIELD 175,340 121,245 56,557 165,604 4,000 522,746 476,846 999,592 KING CITY 121,639 84,111 40,705 114,884 3,000 364,339 330,802 695,141 MARINA 194,277 134,339 62,147 183,489 5,000 579,251 528,344 1,107,596 MONTEREY 250,549 173,250 78,757 236,637 6,000 745,193 681,380 1,426,572 PACIFIC GROVE 131,710 91,075 43,678 124,396 3,000 393,859 358,191 752,050 SALINAS 1,422,451 983,599 424,679 1,343,466 10,000 4,184,195 3,868,421 8,052,616 SAND CITY 3,310 2,289 5,777 3,126 1,000 15,502 9,002 24,505 SEASIDE 287,947 199,110 89,796 271,958 6,000 854,810 783,084 1,637,893 SOLEDAD 242,996 168,027 76,527 229,503 6,000 723,053 660,838 1,383,890
NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 189,664 131,149 65,935 179,132 5,000 570,880 515,799 1,086,679 CALISTOGA 45,937 31,765 19,607 43,386 2,000 142,695 124,928 267,622 NAPA 683,332 472,511 225,060 645,388 7,500 2,033,791 1,858,351 3,892,142 SAINT HELENA 48,015 33,201 20,277 45,348 2,000 148,841 130,578 279,419 YOUNTVILLE 26,314 18,196 13,282 24,853 1,000 83,644 71,562 155,205
NEVADA COUNTY
GRASS VALLEY 119,878 82,893 109,332 113,221 3,000 428,324 326,014 754,338 NEVADA CITY 29,483 20,387 30,509 27,846 1,000 109,225 80,181 189,405 TRUCKEE 147,688 102,124 133,582 1,749,411 4,000 2,136,804 401,645 2,538,450 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 8 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code
ORANGE COUNTY
ALISO VIEJO 456,446 315,624 203,844 431,101 7,500 1,414,516 1,241,327 2,655,843 ANAHEIM 3,044,849 2,105,457 1,332,580 2,875,775 10,000 9,368,660 8,280,605 17,649,265 BREA 424,190 293,320 189,778 400,636 6,000 1,313,924 1,153,605 2,467,529 BUENA PARK 741,831 512,963 328,293 700,639 7,500 2,291,226 2,017,444 4,308,670 COSTA MESA 990,329 684,794 436,657 935,338 10,000 3,057,118 2,693,245 5,750,363 CYPRESS 443,611 306,749 198,247 418,978 7,500 1,375,085 1,206,420 2,581,505 DANA POINT 291,943 201,873 132,109 275,732 6,000 907,658 793,953 1,701,611 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 503,264 347,998 224,260 475,319 7,500 1,558,340 1,368,649 2,926,989 FULLERTON 1,271,083 878,931 559,086 1,200,503 10,000 3,919,602 3,456,768 7,376,371 GARDEN GROVE 1,514,616 1,047,329 665,285 1,430,512 10,000 4,667,741 4,119,066 8,786,808 HUNTINGTON BEACH 1,747,197 1,208,154 766,707 1,650,179 10,000 5,382,237 4,751,581 10,133,818 IRVINE 2,709,513 1,873,578 1,186,348 2,559,060 10,000 8,338,499 7,368,643 15,707,142 LAGUNA BEACH 202,517 140,037 93,112 191,272 5,000 631,937 550,754 1,182,691 LAGUNA HILLS 276,352 191,092 125,310 261,007 6,000 859,762 751,553 1,611,314 LAGUNA NIGUEL 569,607 393,873 253,191 537,978 7,500 1,762,150 1,549,073 3,311,223 LAGUNA WOODS 156,325 108,096 72,969 147,644 4,000 489,034 425,132 914,166 LA HABRA 552,696 382,179 245,816 522,006 7,500 1,710,197 1,503,081 3,213,278 LAKE FOREST 767,027 530,385 339,281 724,436 7,500 2,368,628 2,085,965 4,454,593 LA PALMA 137,195 94,867 64,627 129,576 4,000 430,265 373,107 803,372 LOS ALAMITOS 106,778 73,835 51,363 100,849 3,000 335,826 290,388 626,214 MISSION VIEJO 824,584 570,185 364,380 778,797 7,500 2,545,447 2,242,495 4,787,942 NEWPORT BEACH 749,675 518,387 331,714 708,047 7,500 2,315,323 2,038,776 4,354,099 ORANGE 1,228,932 849,784 540,705 1,160,692 10,000 3,790,112 3,342,136 7,132,248 PLACENTIA 462,248 319,636 206,374 436,580 7,500 1,432,339 1,257,105 2,689,443 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 422,121 291,889 188,876 398,682 6,000 1,307,569 1,147,978 2,455,547 SAN CLEMENTE 564,730 390,501 251,064 533,372 7,500 1,747,167 1,535,809 3,282,976 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 308,908 213,604 139,507 291,755 6,000 959,773 840,089 1,799,862 SANTA ANA 2,732,710 1,889,619 1,196,464 2,580,969 10,000 8,409,761 7,431,730 15,841,491 SEAL BEACH 222,219 153,660 101,704 209,880 6,000 693,464 604,335 1,297,799 STANTON 344,078 237,924 154,843 324,972 6,000 1,067,817 935,736 2,003,553 TUSTIN 707,797 489,428 313,452 668,494 7,500 2,186,671 1,924,885 4,111,556 VILLA PARK 51,615 35,691 27,308 48,749 2,000 165,363 140,370 305,733 WESTMINSTER 801,105 553,950 354,141 756,622 7,500 2,473,318 2,178,643 4,651,961 YORBA LINDA 599,478 414,528 266,217 566,190 7,500 1,853,912 1,630,307 3,484,219 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 9 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code
PLACER COUNTY
AUBURN 121,322 83,892 58,025 114,585 3,000 380,823 329,940 710,763 COLFAX 17,748 12,272 12,586 16,762 1,000 60,369 48,266 108,635 LINCOLN 460,540 318,455 206,843 434,967 7,500 1,428,305 1,252,460 2,680,765 LOOMIS 59,987 41,480 31,117 56,656 2,000 191,241 163,138 354,379 ROCKLIN 627,605 433,977 280,135 592,756 7,500 1,941,974 1,706,801 3,648,774 ROSEVILLE 1,346,309 930,948 595,437 1,271,552 10,000 4,154,246 3,661,350 7,815,596
PLUMAS COUNTY
PORTOLA 18,487 12,784 8,837 131,011 1,000 172,120 50,277 222,397
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BANNING 275,111 190,234 123,264 259,835 6,000 854,444 748,177 1,602,621 BEAUMONT 498,193 344,491 219,325 470,529 7,500 1,540,038 1,354,858 2,894,897 BLYTHE 163,623 113,142 75,257 154,537 4,000 510,559 444,980 955,539 CALIMESA 96,505 66,731 46,355 91,146 3,000 303,737 262,448 566,185 CANYON LAKE 97,446 67,382 46,761 92,036 3,000 306,625 265,010 571,636 CATHEDRAL CITY 452,793 313,098 199,775 427,650 7,500 1,400,817 1,231,391 2,632,208 COACHELLA 373,816 258,487 165,767 353,059 6,000 1,157,130 1,016,611 2,173,741 CORONA 1,382,201 955,767 599,984 1,305,451 10,000 4,253,403 3,758,960 8,012,363 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 287,066 198,501 128,412 271,126 6,000 891,106 780,690 1,671,795 EASTVALE 613,977 424,554 269,182 579,884 7,500 1,895,098 1,669,739 3,564,837 HEMET 791,598 547,375 345,667 747,642 7,500 2,439,781 2,152,786 4,592,567 INDIAN WELLS 42,028 29,062 22,898 39,694 1,000 134,682 114,297 248,979 INDIO 799,688 552,970 349,150 755,283 7,500 2,464,591 2,174,788 4,639,379 JURUPA VALLEY 924,223 639,083 402,776 872,903 10,000 2,848,985 2,513,467 5,362,452 LAKE ELSINORE 633,618 438,135 277,640 598,435 7,500 1,955,327 1,723,153 3,678,480 LA QUINTA 334,350 231,197 148,773 315,784 6,000 1,036,104 909,280 1,945,384 MENIFEE 968,690 669,831 421,923 914,901 10,000 2,985,345 2,634,396 5,619,741 MORENO VALLEY 1,833,683 1,267,958 794,394 1,731,862 10,000 5,637,897 4,986,784 10,624,681 MURRIETA 974,571 673,898 424,456 920,455 10,000 3,003,379 2,650,389 5,653,768 NORCO 234,694 162,286 105,861 221,662 6,000 730,503 638,261 1,368,763 PALM DESERT 446,305 308,612 196,981 421,522 7,500 1,380,920 1,213,746 2,594,666 PALM SPRINGS 389,170 269,104 172,379 367,560 6,000 1,204,212 1,058,365 2,262,577 PERRIS 695,023 480,595 304,081 656,430 7,500 2,143,628 1,890,146 4,033,774 RANCHO MIRAGE 149,766 103,560 69,290 141,450 4,000 468,066 407,295 875,362 RIVERSIDE 2,784,624 1,925,517 1,203,875 2,630,001 10,000 8,554,017 7,572,914 16,126,931 SAN JACINTO 476,298 329,352 209,897 449,851 7,500 1,472,898 1,295,315 2,768,213 TEMECULA 966,806 668,528 421,112 913,121 10,000 2,979,568 2,629,273 5,608,841 WILDOMAR 323,266 223,533 144,000 305,316 6,000 1,002,116 879,138 1,881,253 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 10 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
CITRUS HEIGHTS 772,203 533,964 351,382 729,325 7,500 2,394,375 2,100,042 4,494,417 ELK GROVE 1,558,272 1,077,517 704,188 1,471,745 10,000 4,821,722 4,237,793 9,059,515 FOLSOM 752,686 520,468 342,622 710,891 7,500 2,334,168 2,046,964 4,381,131 GALT 224,992 155,578 105,782 212,499 6,000 704,851 611,877 1,316,728 ISLETON 6,999 4,840 7,941 6,610 1,000 27,390 19,034 46,423 RANCHO CORDOVA 714,118 493,799 325,312 674,464 7,500 2,215,193 1,942,075 4,157,268 SACRAMENTO 4,580,170 3,167,103 2,060,483 4,325,844 20,000 14,153,600 12,455,982 26,609,582
SAN BENITO COUNTY
HOLLISTER 377,593 261,099 158,256 356,626 6,000 1,159,574 1,026,882 2,186,456 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 18,347 12,686 12,256 17,328 1,000 61,617 49,894 111,511
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADELANTO 322,756 223,180 139,810 304,834 6,000 996,579 877,749 1,874,328 APPLE VALLEY 669,140 462,698 284,703 631,984 7,500 2,056,026 1,819,757 3,875,783 BARSTOW 224,781 155,432 98,826 212,299 6,000 697,339 611,302 1,308,641 BIG BEAR LAKE 44,432 30,724 23,386 417,490 2,000 518,031 120,834 638,865 CHINO 819,936 566,971 347,781 774,407 7,500 2,516,596 2,229,854 4,746,450 CHINO HILLS 690,832 477,698 293,777 652,472 7,500 2,122,279 1,878,750 4,001,028 COLTON 473,825 327,641 203,002 447,514 7,500 1,459,482 1,288,588 2,748,070 FONTANA 1,882,648 1,301,816 792,316 1,778,109 10,000 5,764,890 5,119,947 10,884,837 GRAND TERRACE 115,696 80,002 53,196 109,272 3,000 361,166 314,641 675,807 HESPERIA 880,716 608,999 373,206 831,812 10,000 2,704,732 2,395,147 5,099,880 HIGHLAND 501,221 346,585 214,462 473,390 7,500 1,543,158 1,363,094 2,906,253 LOMA LINDA 222,096 153,575 97,703 209,763 6,000 689,138 604,000 1,293,138 MONTCLAIR 335,090 231,708 144,969 316,483 6,000 1,034,249 911,291 1,945,541 NEEDLES 43,402 30,011 22,955 40,992 1,000 138,359 118,032 256,392 ONTARIO 1,590,951 1,100,113 670,299 1,502,609 10,000 4,873,973 4,326,664 9,200,637 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1,535,867 1,062,024 647,257 1,450,584 10,000 4,705,733 4,176,861 8,882,594 REDLANDS 641,453 443,553 273,121 605,835 7,500 1,971,462 1,744,461 3,715,923 RIALTO 916,793 633,945 388,297 865,885 10,000 2,814,921 2,493,260 5,308,181 SAN BERNARDINO 1,967,109 1,360,220 827,647 1,857,880 10,000 6,022,856 5,349,643 11,372,499 TWENTYNINE PALMS 231,762 160,259 101,747 218,893 6,000 718,661 630,288 1,348,949 UPLAND 695,111 480,656 295,567 656,513 7,500 2,135,346 1,890,385 4,025,732 VICTORVILLE 1,207,785 835,161 510,020 1,140,720 10,000 3,703,686 3,284,628 6,988,314 YUCAIPA 482,170 333,412 206,493 455,397 7,500 1,484,972 1,311,285 2,796,257 YUCCA VALLEY 191,856 132,665 85,054 181,202 5,000 595,777 521,761 1,117,537 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 11 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CARLSBAD 1,009,838 698,284 463,403 953,764 10,000 3,135,288 2,746,300 5,881,588 CHULA VISTA 2,419,075 1,672,746 1,103,387 2,284,749 10,000 7,489,956 6,578,784 14,068,741 CORONADO 207,570 143,531 99,065 196,044 5,000 651,210 564,496 1,215,706 DEL MAR 34,695 23,991 20,556 32,768 1,000 113,010 94,354 207,364 EL CAJON 934,682 646,315 429,272 882,781 10,000 2,903,050 2,541,910 5,444,959 ENCINITAS 540,063 373,443 250,061 510,074 7,500 1,681,142 1,468,725 3,149,866 ESCONDIDO 1,328,112 918,365 607,943 1,254,365 10,000 4,118,786 3,611,862 7,730,648 IMPERIAL BEACH 233,364 161,367 110,779 220,406 6,000 731,917 634,645 1,366,563 LA MESA 532,447 368,178 246,603 502,882 7,500 1,657,610 1,448,015 3,105,626 LEMON GROVE 241,393 166,919 114,425 227,989 6,000 756,727 656,480 1,413,207 NATIONAL CITY 539,922 373,346 249,997 509,941 7,500 1,680,706 1,468,342 3,149,048 OCEANSIDE 1,521,526 1,052,108 695,779 1,437,039 10,000 4,716,452 4,137,860 8,854,312 POWAY 428,337 296,187 199,323 404,552 6,000 1,334,399 1,164,881 2,499,280 SAN DIEGO 12,152,843 8,403,468 5,523,834 11,478,023 20,000 37,578,168 33,050,212 70,628,380 SAN MARCOS 832,200 575,451 382,731 785,989 7,500 2,583,871 2,263,205 4,847,076 SANTEE 522,403 361,232 242,041 493,395 7,500 1,626,571 1,420,698 3,047,269 SOLANA BEACH 113,539 78,510 56,362 107,235 3,000 358,647 308,776 667,422 VISTA 878,902 607,745 403,941 830,099 7,500 2,728,187 2,390,215 5,118,402
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO 7,693,994 5,320,256 1,988,423 7,266,765 20,000 22,289,438 20,924,170 43,213,608
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
ESCALON 65,490 45,285 31,226 61,853 2,000 205,854 178,102 383,956 LATHROP 308,829 213,549 129,417 291,680 6,000 949,475 839,873 1,789,348 LODI 583,614 403,558 240,297 551,207 7,500 1,786,176 1,587,164 3,373,340 MANTECA 781,782 540,588 320,261 738,371 7,500 2,388,501 2,126,091 4,514,592 RIPON 140,654 97,260 61,556 132,844 4,000 436,314 382,516 818,830 STOCKTON 2,847,561 1,969,036 1,153,834 2,689,442 10,000 8,669,874 7,744,072 16,413,946 TRACY 841,751 582,056 344,460 795,011 7,500 2,570,778 2,289,181 4,859,959
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 161,413 111,614 85,061 152,450 4,000 514,538 438,970 953,508 ATASCADERO 270,982 187,379 139,543 255,935 6,000 859,839 736,948 1,596,787 EL PASO DE ROBLES 276,097 190,916 142,086 260,766 6,000 875,865 750,858 1,626,723 GROVER BEACH 112,289 77,646 60,634 106,054 3,000 359,624 305,376 665,000 MORRO BAY 92,877 64,223 50,982 87,720 3,000 298,803 252,584 551,387 PISMO BEACH 70,851 48,992 40,030 66,917 2,000 228,790 192,682 421,472 SAN LUIS OBISPO 420,704 290,909 213,990 397,343 6,000 1,328,946 1,144,124 2,473,070 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 12 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code
SAN MATEO COUNTY
ATHERTON 61,458 42,497 31,492 58,045 2,000 195,492 167,137 362,629 BELMONT 247,600 171,211 112,338 233,851 6,000 771,000 673,359 1,444,359 BRISBANE 42,724 29,543 23,356 40,351 1,000 136,973 116,189 253,162 BURLINGAME 275,137 190,252 124,299 259,860 6,000 855,548 748,249 1,603,796 COLMA 12,827 8,869 10,371 12,115 1,000 45,182 34,883 80,065 DALY CITY 923,202 638,377 405,768 871,939 10,000 2,849,286 2,510,690 5,359,975 EAST PALO ALTO 264,485 182,887 119,672 249,799 6,000 822,842 719,279 1,542,122 FOSTER CITY 296,653 205,130 133,643 280,181 6,000 921,608 806,762 1,728,370 HALF MOON BAY 103,486 71,558 49,746 97,739 3,000 325,530 281,434 606,964 HILLSBOROUGH 100,158 69,257 48,301 94,596 3,000 315,313 272,384 587,697 MENLO PARK 300,703 207,931 135,402 284,006 6,000 934,041 817,775 1,751,816 MILLBRAE 205,369 142,009 93,997 193,966 5,000 640,340 558,511 1,198,851 PACIFICA 340,539 235,476 152,704 321,630 6,000 1,056,349 926,111 1,982,460 PORTOLA VALLEY 39,079 27,022 21,773 36,909 1,000 125,783 106,277 232,060 REDWOOD CITY 734,929 508,190 323,997 694,120 7,500 2,268,736 1,998,673 4,267,410 SAN BRUNO 387,488 267,941 173,095 365,972 6,000 1,200,496 1,053,792 2,254,288 SAN CARLOS 270,692 187,178 122,368 255,661 6,000 841,898 736,158 1,578,056 SAN MATEO 930,984 643,758 409,148 879,289 10,000 2,873,180 2,531,854 5,405,034 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 583,490 403,473 258,223 551,091 7,500 1,803,777 1,586,829 3,390,607 WOODSIDE 46,738 32,319 25,099 44,143 2,000 150,299 127,106 277,405
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
BUELLTON 45,338 31,351 20,701 42,821 2,000 142,211 123,300 265,511 CARPINTERIA 115,811 80,081 45,418 109,380 3,000 353,690 314,952 668,642 GOLETA 287,832 199,031 105,751 271,849 6,000 870,463 782,772 1,653,236 GUADALUPE 74,962 51,835 31,091 70,800 2,000 230,688 203,863 434,552 LOMPOC 390,825 270,248 141,874 369,123 6,000 1,178,070 1,062,866 2,240,936 SANTA BARBARA 770,099 532,510 274,897 727,337 7,500 2,312,343 2,094,320 4,406,664 SANTA MARIA 965,397 667,554 343,394 911,791 10,000 2,898,136 2,625,442 5,523,578 SOLVANG 51,237 35,429 22,770 48,392 2,000 159,828 139,340 299,168 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 13 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CAMPBELL 386,353 267,156 161,202 364,899 6,000 1,185,609 1,050,704 2,236,313 CUPERTINO 533,117 368,640 220,614 503,514 7,500 1,633,385 1,449,835 3,083,220 GILROY 528,900 365,724 218,907 499,531 7,500 1,620,562 1,438,367 3,058,929 LOS ALTOS 278,782 192,773 117,655 263,302 6,000 858,512 758,160 1,616,672 LOS ALTOS HILLS 74,857 51,762 35,103 70,700 2,000 234,422 203,576 437,998 LOS GATOS 295,500 204,333 124,423 279,092 6,000 909,347 803,626 1,712,973 MILPITAS 722,014 499,260 297,083 681,923 7,500 2,207,780 1,963,551 4,171,331 MONTE SERENO 30,980 21,422 17,341 29,259 1,000 100,002 84,251 184,253 MORGAN HILL 404,013 279,367 168,351 381,579 6,000 1,239,309 1,098,730 2,338,040 MOUNTAIN VIEW 735,986 508,921 302,739 695,118 7,500 2,250,263 2,001,546 4,251,809 PALO ALTO 603,043 416,993 248,922 569,558 7,500 1,846,016 1,640,003 3,486,019 SAN JOSE 8,942,875 6,183,834 3,625,020 8,446,298 20,000 27,218,026 24,320,557 51,538,583 SANTA CLARA 1,166,259 806,447 476,920 1,101,499 10,000 3,561,126 3,171,695 6,732,820 SARATOGA 274,706 189,954 116,005 259,452 6,000 846,118 747,075 1,593,193 SUNNYVALE 1,376,144 951,579 561,885 1,299,730 10,000 4,199,339 3,742,488 7,941,827
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
CAPITOLA 86,741 59,980 37,732 81,925 2,000 268,378 235,897 504,275 SANTA CRUZ 569,863 394,050 221,151 538,219 7,500 1,730,783 1,549,767 3,280,550 SCOTTS VALLEY 108,178 74,803 45,870 102,171 3,000 334,023 294,195 628,218 WATSONVILLE 455,813 315,186 177,852 430,502 7,500 1,386,853 1,239,603 2,626,456
SHASTA COUNTY
ANDERSON 98,283 67,961 56,201 92,825 3,000 318,270 267,285 585,555 REDDING 826,090 571,226 436,840 780,219 7,500 2,621,875 2,246,589 4,868,464 SHASTA LAKE 90,993 62,920 52,389 85,941 3,000 295,244 247,461 542,705
SIERRA COUNTY
LOYALTON 6,550 4,529 6,350 22,441 1,000 40,870 17,813 58,683
SISKIYOU COUNTY
DORRIS 7,562 5,229 8,653 7,142 1,000 29,586 20,566 50,152 DUNSMUIR 15,010 10,379 12,447 40,035 1,000 78,871 40,821 119,691 ETNA 6,022 4,164 7,868 5,687 1,000 24,741 16,376 41,117 FORT JONES 6,110 4,225 7,913 5,770 1,000 25,017 16,616 41,633 MONTAGUE 10,828 7,488 10,317 10,227 1,000 39,860 29,448 69,308 MOUNT SHASTA 28,559 19,748 19,350 95,409 1,000 164,065 77,667 241,732 TULELAKE 7,932 5,485 8,841 7,492 1,000 30,749 21,571 52,321 WEED 25,548 17,666 17,816 24,129 1,000 86,159 69,479 155,638 YREKA 68,888 47,635 39,896 65,729 2,000 224,147 187,343 411,491 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 14 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code
SOLANO COUNTY
BENICIA 238,462 164,892 107,677 225,221 6,000 742,251 648,508 1,390,759 DIXON 167,426 115,772 77,031 158,129 4,000 522,358 455,322 977,680 FAIRFIELD 1,060,881 733,579 462,485 1,001,972 10,000 3,268,917 2,885,113 6,154,030 RIO VISTA 87,947 60,814 42,742 83,064 2,000 276,568 239,177 515,745 SUISUN CITY 259,353 179,338 116,690 244,951 6,000 806,331 705,321 1,511,652 VACAVILLE 900,550 622,714 393,315 850,545 10,000 2,777,124 2,449,088 5,226,212 VALLEJO 1,107,407 765,752 482,557 1,045,916 10,000 3,411,632 3,011,645 6,423,277
SONOMA COUNTY
CLOVERDALE 79,294 54,830 39,073 74,891 2,000 250,087 215,642 465,730 COTATI 66,731 46,143 33,643 63,025 2,000 211,543 181,478 393,020 HEALDSBURG 99,533 68,825 47,821 94,006 3,000 313,185 270,684 583,869 PETALUMA 526,593 364,129 232,408 497,353 7,500 1,627,983 1,432,094 3,060,077 ROHNERT PARK 387,911 268,233 172,466 366,371 6,000 1,200,981 1,054,941 2,255,922 SANTA ROSA 1,567,208 1,083,696 682,190 1,480,184 10,000 4,823,278 4,262,094 9,085,371 SEBASTOPOL 66,220 45,790 33,422 62,543 2,000 209,976 180,089 390,065 SONOMA 94,797 65,550 45,774 89,533 3,000 298,653 257,804 556,457 WINDSOR 230,750 159,559 104,536 217,937 6,000 718,782 627,535 1,346,317
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CERES 431,356 298,275 177,372 407,404 6,000 1,320,407 1,173,093 2,493,500 HUGHSON 66,599 46,052 31,444 62,901 2,000 208,996 181,119 390,114 MODESTO 1,928,197 1,333,313 776,209 1,821,129 10,000 5,868,849 5,243,821 11,112,670 NEWMAN 108,777 75,217 48,318 102,737 3,000 338,048 295,823 633,871 OAKDALE 204,040 141,090 86,430 192,710 5,000 629,269 554,896 1,184,165 PATTERSON 214,076 148,030 90,445 202,189 5,000 659,739 582,189 1,241,928 RIVERBANK 218,407 151,025 92,178 206,280 5,000 672,889 593,969 1,266,858 TURLOCK 634,604 438,817 258,684 599,366 7,500 1,938,971 1,725,834 3,664,805 WATERFORD 80,103 55,390 36,847 75,656 2,000 249,996 217,845 467,841
SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 83,766 57,922 37,066 79,114 2,000 259,869 227,805 487,674 YUBA CITY 617,842 427,226 242,791 583,535 7,500 1,878,894 1,680,249 3,559,143
TEHAMA COUNTY
CORNING 72,462 50,106 32,440 68,438 2,000 225,447 197,064 422,510 RED BLUFF 130,495 90,235 54,576 123,249 3,000 401,555 354,887 756,442 TEHAMA 3,830 2,648 6,261 3,617 1,000 17,355 10,415 27,770
TRINITY COUNTY
12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 15 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code
TULARE COUNTY
DINUBA 224,218 155,042 88,600 211,767 6,000 685,627 609,770 1,295,397 EXETER 91,152 63,030 38,868 86,090 3,000 282,140 247,892 530,032 FARMERSVILLE 91,416 63,213 38,966 86,340 3,000 282,935 248,610 531,545 LINDSAY 111,779 77,293 46,577 105,572 3,000 344,220 303,987 648,207 PORTERVILLE 551,551 381,388 210,939 520,925 7,500 1,672,303 1,499,969 3,172,272 TULARE 613,405 424,158 234,057 579,344 7,500 1,858,464 1,668,183 3,526,647 VISALIA 1,259,181 870,700 475,412 1,189,261 10,000 3,804,554 3,424,399 7,228,953 WOODLAKE 67,884 46,941 30,171 64,115 2,000 211,111 184,614 395,725
TUOLUMNE COUNTY
SONORA 45,770 31,649 32,010 43,228 2,000 154,656 124,473 279,129
VENTURA COUNTY
CAMARILLO 622,895 430,721 275,766 588,307 7,500 1,925,189 1,693,992 3,619,181 FILLMORE 148,771 102,873 69,517 140,510 4,000 465,671 404,590 870,261 MOORPARK 318,785 220,434 143,475 301,084 6,000 989,778 866,951 1,856,730 OJAI 67,391 46,600 34,116 63,649 2,000 213,756 183,273 397,029 OXNARD 1,775,227 1,227,537 777,043 1,676,653 10,000 5,466,459 4,827,811 10,294,270 PORT HUENEME 195,404 135,118 89,803 184,553 5,000 609,877 531,409 1,141,286 SAN BUENAVENTURA 968,945 670,008 426,301 915,142 10,000 2,990,396 2,635,091 5,625,487 SANTA PAULA 276,634 191,287 125,139 261,273 6,000 860,333 752,319 1,612,652 SIMI VALLEY 1,110,577 767,943 487,913 1,048,909 10,000 3,425,341 3,020,264 6,445,605 THOUSAND OAKS 1,114,688 770,786 489,701 1,052,792 10,000 3,437,967 3,031,445 6,469,412
YOLO COUNTY
DAVIS 569,475 393,782 260,135 537,854 7,500 1,768,746 1,548,714 3,317,460 WEST SACRAMENTO 477,038 329,863 218,689 450,549 7,500 1,483,639 1,297,327 2,780,966 WINTERS 66,326 45,863 34,539 62,643 2,000 211,371 180,376 391,747 WOODLAND 527,165 364,525 241,165 497,893 7,500 1,638,249 1,433,650 3,071,899
YUBA COUNTY
MARYSVILLE 116,110 80,288 43,370 109,663 3,000 352,431 315,767 668,197 WHEATLAND 33,550 23,199 15,945 31,687 1,000 105,382 91,242 196,624 Statewide Total 291,564,500$ 201,611,500$ 119,847,250$ 280,598,500$ 2,709,500$ 896,331,250$ 792,923,000$ 1,689,254,250$ Notes:
1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."
2. Rolling Hills has no public streets and is therefore not eligible for HUTA or RMRA allocations.
3. Str&HwysCode §§ 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107 and RMRA amounts are paid monthly. Includes special payments for snow removal.
4. Str&HwysCode § 2107.5 amounts are typically paid by the State Controller once per year in July.
5. Str&HwysCode § 2103 allocations replace the former Prop42 TCRF revenues. Previously adjusted annually by the BOE until July 2019. 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 16 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct
ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 699,876 489,302 274,171 668,698 7,500 2,139,548 2,017,062 4,156,609 ALBANY 199,089 139,189 81,426 190,220 5,000 614,925 573,781 1,188,705 BERKELEY 1,126,346 787,459 438,313 1,076,170 10,000 3,438,288 3,246,160 6,684,448 DUBLIN 658,993 460,720 258,436 629,636 7,500 2,015,284 1,899,234 3,914,518 EMERYVILLE 112,678 78,776 48,168 107,659 3,000 350,281 324,741 675,022 FREMONT 2,041,713 1,427,417 790,622 1,950,759 10,000 6,220,511 5,884,271 12,104,783 HAYWARD 1,456,007 1,017,934 565,194 1,391,145 10,000 4,440,279 4,196,251 8,636,530 LIVERMORE 778,722 544,425 304,517 744,031 7,500 2,379,195 2,244,296 4,623,491 NEWARK 421,435 294,637 167,004 402,661 6,000 1,291,737 1,214,588 2,506,325 OAKLAND 3,846,313 2,689,062 1,485,184 3,674,967 10,000 11,705,525 11,085,176 22,790,701 PIEDMONT 99,980 69,899 43,281 95,526 3,000 311,685 288,144 599,829 PLEASANTON 708,099 495,051 277,336 676,555 7,500 2,164,541 2,040,760 4,205,301 SAN LEANDRO 806,765 564,031 315,311 770,825 7,500 2,464,431 2,325,117 4,789,548 UNION CITY 621,928 434,806 244,170 594,222 7,500 1,902,626 1,792,412 3,695,038
ALPINE COUNTY
AMADOR COUNTY
AMADOR 1,776 1,242 5,675 1,697 1,000 11,389 5,118 16,508 IONE 78,588 54,943 43,511 75,087 2,000 254,129 226,492 480,621 JACKSON 45,030 31,482 26,981 43,024 2,000 148,518 129,779 278,297 PLYMOUTH 9,493 6,637 9,476 9,070 1,000 35,675 27,358 63,033 SUTTER CREEK 23,470 16,408 16,361 22,424 1,000 79,663 67,641 147,304
BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS 17,671 12,354 12,326 16,884 1,000 60,236 50,929 111,165 CHICO 953,657 666,728 410,969 911,174 10,000 2,952,528 2,748,466 5,700,994 GRIDLEY 67,026 46,860 33,347 64,040 2,000 213,273 193,171 406,444 OROVILLE 176,987 123,736 80,180 169,103 4,000 554,006 510,081 1,064,087 PARADISE 81,181 56,756 39,376 109,980 2,000 289,292 233,965 523,258
CALAVERAS COUNTY
ANGELS CAMP 32,421 22,666 29,025 30,977 1,000 116,089 93,438 209,527
COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA 57,081 39,907 20,687 54,538 2,000 174,212 164,508 338,720 WILLIAMS 49,444 34,567 18,562 47,241 2,000 151,814 142,498 294,312 Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ANTIOCH 1,025,123 716,692 430,167 979,456 10,000 3,161,438 2,954,433 6,115,870 BRENTWOOD 572,875 400,512 242,510 547,354 7,500 1,770,750 1,651,040 3,421,790 CLAYTON 98,248 68,688 45,567 93,871 3,000 309,375 283,154 592,529 CONCORD 1,114,962 779,500 467,444 1,065,293 10,000 3,437,200 3,213,351 6,650,550 DANVILLE 387,736 271,077 165,688 370,463 6,000 1,200,963 1,117,465 2,318,428 EL CERRITO 230,356 161,048 100,384 220,094 6,000 717,882 663,891 1,381,773 HERCULES 233,517 163,258 101,696 223,114 6,000 727,585 673,002 1,400,588 LAFAYETTE 225,756 157,832 98,476 215,699 6,000 703,762 650,634 1,354,397 MARTINEZ 333,328 233,039 143,112 318,479 6,000 1,033,957 960,660 1,994,618 MORAGA 153,375 107,229 68,442 146,543 4,000 479,588 442,031 921,619 OAKLEY 399,555 279,340 170,592 381,756 6,000 1,237,242 1,151,528 2,388,770 ORINDA 173,337 121,185 76,725 165,615 4,000 540,863 499,563 1,040,425 PINOLE 168,134 117,547 74,566 160,644 4,000 524,890 484,566 1,009,455 PITTSBURG 677,028 473,329 285,727 646,868 7,500 2,090,451 1,951,212 4,041,664 PLEASANT HILL 306,448 214,246 131,958 292,797 6,000 951,450 883,192 1,834,642 RICHMOND 1,029,137 719,498 431,832 983,291 10,000 3,173,758 2,966,001 6,139,759 SAN PABLO 285,971 199,930 123,461 273,232 6,000 888,594 824,176 1,712,770 SAN RAMON 751,202 525,186 316,505 717,738 7,500 2,318,132 2,164,985 4,483,117 WALNUT CREEK 624,290 436,458 263,844 596,479 7,500 1,928,570 1,799,219 3,727,790
DEL NORTE COUNTY
CRESCENT CITY 59,922 41,893 25,314 57,253 2,000 186,382 172,697 359,079
EL DORADO COUNTY
PLACERVILLE 96,002 67,117 68,019 91,725 3,000 325,862 276,679 602,541 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 190,254 133,012 130,085 1,226,966 5,000 1,685,317 548,316 2,233,633 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 2 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL
FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS 1,105,763 773,069 391,862 1,056,503 10,000 3,337,196 3,186,837 6,524,033 COALINGA 160,435 112,164 60,959 153,288 4,000 490,845 462,377 953,222 FIREBAUGH 75,435 52,739 31,206 72,075 2,000 233,455 217,407 450,862 FOWLER 63,652 44,501 27,081 60,816 2,000 198,049 183,446 381,495 FRESNO 4,825,633 3,373,731 1,693,970 4,610,661 20,000 14,523,995 13,907,603 28,431,598 HURON 54,443 38,063 23,857 52,018 2,000 170,381 156,907 327,288 KERMAN 150,560 105,261 57,502 143,853 4,000 461,176 433,918 895,095 KINGSBURG 114,241 79,869 44,789 109,152 3,000 351,051 329,246 680,297 MENDOTA 111,772 78,143 43,925 106,793 3,000 343,634 322,131 665,765 ORANGE COVE 85,408 59,711 34,696 81,603 2,000 263,418 246,147 509,565 PARLIER 129,373 90,448 50,086 123,609 3,000 396,515 372,855 769,370 REEDLEY 225,383 157,571 83,693 215,343 6,000 687,990 649,560 1,337,550 SANGER 236,003 164,996 87,411 225,490 6,000 719,901 680,168 1,400,069 SAN JOAQUIN 32,847 22,964 16,298 31,384 1,000 104,493 94,666 199,159 SELMA 219,487 153,449 81,629 209,709 5,000 669,274 632,566 1,301,840
GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND 73,278 51,230 27,462 70,013 2,000 223,983 211,188 435,171 WILLOWS 56,814 39,720 22,370 54,283 2,000 175,188 163,740 338,928
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
ARCATA 165,949 116,020 82,484 158,556 4,000 527,009 478,270 1,005,279 BLUE LAKE 10,692 7,475 9,805 10,215 1,000 39,186 30,813 70,000 EUREKA 239,555 167,480 116,941 228,884 6,000 758,859 690,405 1,449,264 FERNDALE 12,370 8,648 10,591 11,819 1,000 44,427 35,650 80,077 FORTUNA 111,186 77,733 56,849 106,233 3,000 355,001 320,442 675,443 RIO DELL 30,077 21,027 18,879 28,737 1,000 99,720 86,681 186,401 TRINIDAD 2,726 1,906 6,076 2,605 1,000 14,313 7,857 22,170
IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 244,546 170,969 106,901 233,652 6,000 762,067 704,788 1,466,855 CALEXICO 343,869 240,408 148,369 328,550 6,000 1,067,196 991,038 2,058,234 CALIPATRIA 58,706 41,043 29,310 56,090 2,000 187,149 169,191 356,340 EL CENTRO 398,019 278,266 170,977 380,288 6,000 1,233,550 1,147,101 2,380,650 HOLTVILLE 49,097 34,325 25,299 46,910 2,000 157,632 141,500 299,132 IMPERIAL 190,884 133,452 84,496 182,381 5,000 596,214 550,133 1,146,347 WESTMORLAND 17,938 12,541 12,289 17,138 1,000 60,906 51,697 112,602
INYO COUNTY
BISHOP 34,383 24,038 19,676 32,852 1,000 111,949 99,094 211,043 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 3 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL
KERN COUNTY
ARVIN 175,371 122,607 53,289 167,558 4,000 522,825 505,423 1,028,248 BAKERSFIELD 3,626,347 2,535,277 1,007,466 3,464,800 10,000 10,643,890 10,451,228 21,095,118 CALIFORNIA CITY 133,324 93,211 41,663 127,385 4,000 399,583 384,244 783,826 DELANO 459,335 321,134 131,804 438,873 7,500 1,358,645 1,323,816 2,682,461 MARICOPA 9,102 6,363 7,317 8,697 1,000 32,479 26,232 58,711 MCFARLAND 125,900 88,020 39,611 120,292 3,000 376,824 362,848 739,672 RIDGECREST 247,618 173,117 73,265 236,587 6,000 736,588 713,643 1,450,231 SHAFTER 189,304 132,347 57,141 180,870 5,000 564,663 545,578 1,110,241 TAFT 77,229 53,993 26,153 73,789 2,000 233,165 222,577 455,741 TEHACHAPI 115,990 81,092 36,871 110,823 3,000 347,776 334,287 682,064 WASCO 240,790 168,343 71,377 230,063 6,000 716,572 693,962 1,410,535
KINGS COUNTY
AVENAL 121,647 85,047 40,829 116,228 3,000 366,750 350,590 717,340 CORCORAN 192,039 134,259 61,677 183,484 5,000 576,459 553,460 1,129,919 HANFORD 522,969 365,622 159,691 499,672 7,500 1,555,453 1,507,211 3,062,664 LEMOORE 240,035 167,815 75,892 229,342 6,000 719,084 691,787 1,410,871
LAKE COUNTY
CLEARLAKE 149,850 104,764 59,506 143,174 4,000 461,294 431,871 893,165 LAKEPORT 44,107 30,836 20,902 42,142 1,000 138,987 127,117 266,105
LASSEN COUNTY
SUSANVILLE 143,057 100,015 48,613 219,271 4,000 514,955 412,293 927,248
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 179,713 125,642 75,518 171,707 5,000 557,581 517,938 1,075,519 ALHAMBRA 733,629 512,900 293,486 700,947 7,500 2,248,462 2,114,338 4,362,800 ARCADIA 505,218 353,212 203,605 482,711 7,500 1,552,246 1,456,052 3,008,298 ARTESIA 146,413 102,361 62,414 139,891 4,000 455,080 421,967 877,046 AVALON 30,583 21,381 16,834 29,220 1,000 99,019 88,140 187,159 AZUSA 448,093 313,274 181,126 428,131 7,500 1,378,125 1,291,416 2,669,541 BALDWIN PARK 639,865 447,347 256,590 611,360 7,500 1,962,662 1,844,108 3,806,771 BELL 303,198 211,974 124,110 289,691 6,000 934,974 873,825 1,808,799 BELLFLOWER 700,453 489,706 280,431 669,249 7,500 2,147,340 2,018,725 4,166,065 BELL GARDENS 350,014 244,704 142,532 334,421 6,000 1,077,670 1,008,748 2,086,419 BEVERLY HILLS 290,455 203,065 119,095 277,516 6,000 896,132 837,100 1,733,233 BRADBURY 8,170 5,712 8,015 7,806 1,000 30,702 23,545 54,247 BURBANK 951,952 665,536 379,397 909,545 10,000 2,916,430 2,743,552 5,659,982 CALABASAS 206,300 144,230 85,980 197,110 5,000 638,619 594,562 1,233,181 CARSON 833,458 582,693 332,769 796,329 7,500 2,552,749 2,402,047 4,954,796 CERRITOS 438,458 306,538 177,335 418,926 6,000 1,347,257 1,263,648 2,610,905 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 4 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL CLAREMONT 332,538 232,486 135,655 317,724 6,000 1,024,403 958,383 1,982,785 COMMERCE 109,916 76,846 48,053 105,020 3,000 342,835 316,782 659,617 COMPTON 853,544 596,736 340,673 815,521 7,500 2,613,974 2,459,937 5,073,911 COVINA 455,676 318,576 184,111 435,377 7,500 1,401,240 1,313,272 2,714,512 CUDAHY 202,277 141,417 84,397 193,266 5,000 626,358 582,968 1,209,326 CULVER CITY 359,204 251,129 146,148 343,202 6,000 1,105,685 1,035,236 2,140,921 DIAMOND BAR 488,142 341,273 196,886 466,396 7,500 1,500,197 1,406,837 2,907,034 DOWNEY 1,011,883 707,435 402,980 966,806 10,000 3,099,105 2,916,275 6,015,379 DUARTE 202,428 141,523 84,456 193,410 5,000 626,818 583,403 1,210,221 EL MONTE 969,100 677,524 386,145 925,928 10,000 2,968,696 2,792,971 5,761,667 EL SEGUNDO 153,606 107,390 65,245 146,763 4,000 477,004 442,697 919,700 GARDENA 540,995 378,225 217,684 516,895 7,500 1,661,299 1,559,163 3,220,462 GLENDALE 1,740,078 1,216,536 689,528 1,662,561 10,000 5,318,702 5,014,950 10,333,652 GLENDORA 466,253 325,970 188,272 445,482 7,500 1,433,477 1,343,752 2,777,229 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 123,876 86,605 53,546 118,357 3,000 385,384 357,013 742,397 HAWTHORNE 781,590 546,431 312,359 746,771 7,500 2,394,651 2,252,562 4,647,213 HERMOSA BEACH 175,078 122,402 73,694 167,278 4,000 542,452 504,579 1,047,031 HIDDEN HILLS 15,371 10,746 10,849 14,686 1,000 52,653 44,300 96,953 HUNTINGTON PARK 485,913 339,715 196,009 464,266 7,500 1,493,403 1,400,414 2,893,817 INDUSTRY 3,827 2,676 6,306 3,657 1,000 17,466 11,030 28,496 INGLEWOOD 963,869 673,867 384,087 920,931 10,000 2,952,754 2,777,897 5,730,650 IRWINDALE 13,329 9,319 10,045 12,735 1,000 46,427 38,414 84,842 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 182,457 127,561 76,598 174,329 5,000 565,944 525,846 1,091,791 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 50,225 35,114 24,564 47,988 2,000 159,891 144,750 304,641 LAKEWOOD 730,974 511,044 292,441 698,410 7,500 2,240,369 2,106,686 4,347,055 LA MIRADA 437,313 305,737 176,884 417,831 6,000 1,343,765 1,260,347 2,604,112 LANCASTER 1,567,309 1,095,748 621,543 1,497,488 10,000 4,792,087 4,517,025 9,309,113 LA PUENTE 337,608 236,031 137,650 322,568 6,000 1,039,858 972,996 2,012,854 LA VERNE 292,081 204,201 119,735 279,069 6,000 901,086 841,784 1,742,870 LAWNDALE 282,277 197,348 115,877 269,702 6,000 871,204 813,530 1,684,734 LOMITA 185,920 129,982 77,960 177,638 5,000 576,500 535,827 1,112,328 LONG BEACH 4,121,877 2,881,716 1,626,776 3,938,255 10,000 12,578,623 11,879,358 24,457,981 LOS ANGELES 34,597,110 24,187,779 13,618,908 33,055,877 20,000 105,479,674 99,709,793 205,189,467 LYNWOOD 608,945 425,730 244,422 581,818 7,500 1,868,415 1,754,996 3,623,411 MALIBU 95,362 66,670 42,325 91,114 3,000 298,472 274,836 573,308 MANHATTAN BEACH 314,991 220,219 128,750 300,959 6,000 970,918 907,812 1,878,731 MAYWOOD 223,198 156,044 92,630 213,255 6,000 691,127 643,264 1,334,391 MONROVIA 336,205 235,050 137,098 321,228 6,000 1,035,581 968,952 2,004,534 MONTEBELLO 556,544 389,095 223,802 531,751 7,500 1,708,693 1,603,975 3,312,669 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 5 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL MONTEREY PARK 542,185 379,056 218,152 518,032 7,500 1,664,926 1,562,593 3,227,519 NORWALK 918,333 642,031 366,168 877,423 10,000 2,813,954 2,646,659 5,460,614 PALMDALE 1,503,648 1,051,241 596,492 1,436,663 10,000 4,598,045 4,333,554 8,931,598 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 118,592 82,911 51,467 113,309 3,000 369,279 341,786 711,065 PARAMOUNT 474,928 332,035 191,686 453,771 7,500 1,459,921 1,368,756 2,828,677 PASADENA 1,241,316 867,837 493,263 1,186,017 10,000 3,798,433 3,577,504 7,375,937 PICO RIVERA 551,891 385,842 221,971 527,305 7,500 1,694,510 1,590,565 3,285,075 POMONA 1,351,969 945,198 536,805 1,291,741 10,000 4,135,714 3,896,411 8,032,125 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 375,872 262,782 152,707 359,128 6,000 1,156,489 1,083,273 2,239,763 REDONDO BEACH 623,748 436,079 250,247 595,961 7,500 1,913,536 1,797,658 3,711,194 ROLLING HILLS (2)
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 75,000 52,435 34,313 71,659 2,000 235,407 216,153 451,560 ROSEMEAD 453,954 317,371 183,433 433,731 7,500 1,395,989 1,308,307 2,704,296 SAN DIMAS 310,284 216,928 126,898 296,462 6,000 956,573 894,248 1,850,821 SAN FERNANDO 209,994 146,812 87,433 200,639 5,000 649,879 605,208 1,255,087 SAN GABRIEL 350,431 244,996 142,696 334,820 6,000 1,078,943 1,009,951 2,088,894 SAN MARINO 111,453 77,920 48,657 106,488 3,000 347,517 321,210 668,727 SANTA CLARITA 2,048,249 1,431,986 810,794 1,957,003 10,000 6,258,033 5,903,107 12,161,140 SANTA FE SPRINGS 165,967 116,032 70,109 158,573 4,000 514,681 478,321 993,002 SANTA MONICA 828,778 579,421 330,928 791,858 7,500 2,538,484 2,388,560 4,927,045 SIERRA MADRE 99,269 69,402 43,863 94,847 3,000 310,381 286,097 596,478 SIGNAL HILL 104,455 73,028 45,904 99,802 3,000 326,188 301,043 627,231 SOUTH EL MONTE 173,524 121,315 73,082 165,794 4,000 537,715 500,100 1,037,815 SOUTH GATE 822,535 575,057 328,471 785,893 7,500 2,519,456 2,370,569 4,890,025 SOUTH PASADENA 239,440 167,399 99,021 228,773 6,000 740,633 690,072 1,430,705 TEMPLE CITY 324,395 226,793 132,451 309,944 6,000 999,582 934,914 1,934,497 TORRANCE 1,304,141 911,761 517,985 1,246,044 10,000 3,989,932 3,758,570 7,748,502 VERNON 1,874 1,310 5,537 1,790 1,000 11,511 5,400 16,911 WALNUT 252,529 176,550 104,171 241,279 6,000 780,530 727,795 1,508,325 WEST COVINA 973,309 680,467 387,801 929,950 10,000 2,981,526 2,805,101 5,786,627 WEST HOLLYWOOD 316,989 221,616 129,536 302,868 6,000 977,008 913,570 1,890,579 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 72,345 50,579 33,268 69,122 2,000 227,314 208,501 435,815 WHITTIER 780,711 545,816 312,013 745,931 7,500 2,391,971 2,250,029 4,642,000 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 6 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL
MADERA COUNTY
CHOWCHILLA 171,330 119,782 47,920 163,698 4,000 506,730 493,779 1,000,509 MADERA 583,113 407,670 151,555 557,137 7,500 1,706,975 1,680,548 3,387,523
MARIN COUNTY
BELVEDERE 18,852 13,180 13,020 18,012 1,000 64,065 54,333 118,398 CORTE MADERA 90,531 63,293 44,275 86,498 3,000 287,598 260,914 548,512 FAIRFAX 67,399 47,121 34,189 64,397 2,000 215,105 194,246 409,351 LARKSPUR 116,079 81,154 55,415 110,908 3,000 366,557 334,543 701,100 MILL VALLEY 125,394 87,667 59,477 119,808 3,000 395,346 361,390 756,736 NOVATO 471,882 329,906 210,560 450,861 7,500 1,470,710 1,359,978 2,830,687 ROSS 20,735 14,496 13,841 19,811 1,000 69,883 59,758 129,641 SAN ANSELMO 113,451 79,316 54,269 108,397 3,000 358,433 326,968 685,401 SAN RAFAEL 546,137 381,819 242,938 521,808 7,500 1,700,202 1,573,981 3,274,183 SAUSALITO 63,172 44,165 32,346 60,358 2,000 202,041 182,064 384,105 TIBURON 81,048 56,663 40,140 77,437 2,000 257,287 233,581 490,869
MARIPOSA COUNTY
MENDOCINO COUNTY
FORT BRAGG 62,719 43,849 32,313 59,925 2,000 200,806 180,759 381,565 POINT ARENA 4,085 2,856 6,592 3,903 1,000 18,435 11,772 30,208 UKIAH 147,443 103,082 69,478 140,875 4,000 464,878 424,935 889,813 WILLITS 43,929 30,712 24,070 41,972 1,000 141,684 126,605 268,289
MERCED COUNTY
ATWATER 281,948 197,118 92,478 269,388 6,000 846,933 812,583 1,659,516 DOS PALOS 51,451 35,971 20,800 49,159 2,000 159,380 148,282 307,662 GUSTINE 53,973 37,734 21,584 51,568 2,000 166,858 155,550 322,409 LIVINGSTON 126,602 88,511 44,170 120,962 3,000 383,245 364,870 748,115 LOS BANOS 420,441 293,942 135,546 401,711 6,000 1,257,639 1,211,721 2,469,360 MERCED 800,229 559,462 253,650 764,580 7,500 2,385,420 2,306,281 4,691,701
MODOC COUNTY
ALTURAS 24,091 16,843 15,567 24,499 1,000 82,001 69,432 151,433
MONO COUNTY
MAMMOTH LAKES 64,584 45,153 62,426 1,913,725 2,000 2,087,888 186,133 2,274,021 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 7 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL
MONTEREY COUNTY
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 28,087 19,637 13,186 26,836 1,000 88,746 80,949 169,694 DEL REY OAKS 14,004 9,790 8,981 13,380 1,000 47,155 40,359 87,514 GONZALES 75,800 52,994 27,430 72,423 2,000 230,646 218,456 449,103 GREENFIELD 176,863 123,650 57,603 168,984 4,000 531,099 509,723 1,040,822 KING CITY 122,695 85,779 41,431 117,229 3,000 370,134 353,610 723,744 MARINA 195,964 137,003 63,306 187,234 5,000 588,507 564,772 1,153,279 MONTEREY 252,724 176,686 80,252 241,466 6,000 757,129 728,358 1,485,488 PACIFIC GROVE 132,853 92,881 44,464 126,935 3,000 400,134 382,887 783,021 SALINAS 1,434,802 1,003,109 433,167 1,370,884 10,000 4,251,961 4,135,136 8,387,097 SAND CITY 3,339 2,334 5,797 3,190 1,000 15,660 9,623 25,283 SEASIDE 290,447 203,059 91,514 277,508 6,000 868,528 837,075 1,705,602 SOLEDAD 245,105 171,360 77,977 234,186 6,000 734,629 706,400 1,441,029
NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 191,310 133,750 67,171 182,788 5,000 580,019 551,362 1,131,381 CALISTOGA 46,336 32,395 19,906 44,272 2,000 144,908 133,541 278,449 NAPA 689,265 481,884 229,513 658,559 7,500 2,066,720 1,986,479 4,053,199 SAINT HELENA 48,431 33,860 20,590 46,274 2,000 151,155 139,581 290,735 YOUNTVILLE 26,542 18,556 13,453 25,360 1,000 84,912 76,496 161,407
NEVADA COUNTY
GRASS VALLEY 120,919 84,538 111,445 115,532 3,000 435,433 348,491 783,924 NEVADA CITY 29,739 20,791 31,028 28,414 1,000 110,973 85,709 196,682 TRUCKEE 148,971 104,149 136,185 1,752,257 4,000 2,145,562 429,337 2,574,900 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 8 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL
ORANGE COUNTY
ALISO VIEJO 460,410 321,885 207,868 439,899 7,500 1,437,562 1,326,913 2,764,474 ANAHEIM 3,071,285 2,147,219 1,359,421 2,934,466 10,000 9,522,391 8,851,526 18,373,917 BREA 427,873 299,138 193,518 408,812 6,000 1,335,341 1,233,142 2,568,483 BUENA PARK 748,272 523,137 334,833 714,938 7,500 2,328,680 2,156,540 4,485,220 COSTA MESA 998,927 698,377 445,387 954,427 10,000 3,107,119 2,878,935 5,986,054 CYPRESS 447,463 312,833 202,158 427,529 7,500 1,397,482 1,289,599 2,687,081 DANA POINT 294,478 205,878 134,683 281,360 6,000 922,398 848,694 1,771,092 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 507,633 354,900 228,697 485,019 7,500 1,583,750 1,463,013 3,046,762 FULLERTON 1,282,119 896,364 570,291 1,225,003 10,000 3,983,778 3,695,101 7,678,879 GARDEN GROVE 1,527,766 1,068,103 678,637 1,459,707 10,000 4,744,213 4,403,063 9,147,275 HUNTINGTON BEACH 1,762,366 1,232,118 782,109 1,683,856 10,000 5,470,451 5,079,187 10,549,638 IRVINE 2,733,038 1,910,741 1,210,234 2,611,286 10,000 8,475,299 7,876,688 16,351,986 LAGUNA BEACH 204,275 142,814 94,898 195,175 5,000 642,162 588,727 1,230,889 LAGUNA HILLS 278,752 194,883 127,746 266,334 6,000 873,715 803,370 1,677,084 LAGUNA NIGUEL 574,553 401,686 258,212 548,958 7,500 1,790,908 1,655,877 3,446,785 LAGUNA WOODS 157,682 110,240 74,347 150,657 4,000 496,926 454,443 951,370 LA HABRA 557,494 389,759 250,689 532,659 7,500 1,738,102 1,606,714 3,344,815 LAKE FOREST 773,687 540,905 346,042 739,220 7,500 2,407,354 2,229,785 4,637,140 LA PALMA 138,386 96,749 65,836 132,221 4,000 437,192 398,831 836,024 LOS ALAMITOS 107,705 75,300 52,305 102,907 3,000 341,217 310,410 651,627 MISSION VIEJO 831,744 581,495 371,649 794,691 7,500 2,587,079 2,397,108 4,984,187 NEWPORT BEACH 756,184 528,669 338,323 722,498 7,500 2,353,173 2,179,343 4,532,516 ORANGE 1,239,602 866,639 551,539 1,184,380 10,000 3,852,160 3,572,565 7,424,725 PLACENTIA 466,261 325,976 210,449 445,490 7,500 1,455,677 1,343,778 2,799,455 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 425,786 297,679 192,597 406,819 6,000 1,328,881 1,227,128 2,556,009 SAN CLEMENTE 569,633 398,246 256,043 544,257 7,500 1,775,679 1,641,699 3,417,378 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 311,590 217,841 142,230 297,709 6,000 975,370 898,010 1,873,380 SANTA ANA 2,756,437 1,927,100 1,220,554 2,633,643 10,000 8,547,733 7,944,124 16,491,856 SEAL BEACH 224,149 156,708 103,663 214,163 6,000 704,683 646,002 1,350,685 STANTON 347,065 242,643 157,877 331,604 6,000 1,085,189 1,000,252 2,085,441 TUSTIN 713,942 499,136 319,691 682,137 7,500 2,222,407 2,057,600 4,280,007 VILLA PARK 52,063 36,399 27,763 49,744 2,000 167,969 150,048 318,017 WESTMINSTER 808,061 564,937 361,203 772,063 7,500 2,513,765 2,328,853 4,842,619 YORBA LINDA 604,683 422,750 271,501 577,745 7,500 1,884,179 1,742,712 3,626,891 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 9 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL
PLACER COUNTY
AUBURN 122,375 85,556 59,101 116,924 3,000 386,955 352,688 739,643 COLFAX 17,902 12,516 12,744 17,105 1,000 61,266 51,594 112,860 LINCOLN 464,539 324,772 210,927 443,844 7,500 1,451,582 1,338,813 2,790,395 LOOMIS 60,508 42,303 31,649 57,813 2,000 194,273 174,386 368,659 ROCKLIN 633,054 442,585 285,701 604,853 7,500 1,973,694 1,824,479 3,798,173 ROSEVILLE 1,357,999 949,414 607,377 1,297,502 10,000 4,222,291 3,913,788 8,136,079
PLUMAS COUNTY
PORTOLA 18,648 13,037 8,919 131,367 1,000 172,972 53,744 226,716
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BANNING 277,500 194,007 125,659 265,138 6,000 868,304 799,761 1,668,065 BEAUMONT 502,518 351,324 223,661 480,132 7,500 1,565,136 1,448,271 3,013,408 BLYTHE 165,043 115,386 76,681 157,691 4,000 518,802 475,660 994,462 CALIMESA 97,342 68,055 47,195 93,006 3,000 308,599 280,543 589,142 CANYON LAKE 98,293 68,719 47,609 93,914 3,000 311,535 283,282 594,816 CATHEDRAL CITY 456,724 319,308 203,717 436,378 7,500 1,423,628 1,316,292 2,739,919 COACHELLA 377,062 263,614 169,022 360,265 6,000 1,175,962 1,086,703 2,262,665 CORONA 1,394,202 974,725 612,016 1,332,093 10,000 4,323,036 4,018,128 8,341,164 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 289,559 202,438 130,911 276,659 6,000 905,567 834,516 1,740,083 EASTVALE 619,308 432,975 274,527 591,719 7,500 1,926,029 1,784,862 3,710,891 HEMET 798,471 558,232 352,557 762,900 7,500 2,479,661 2,301,214 4,780,874 INDIAN WELLS 42,393 29,638 23,263 40,505 1,000 136,799 122,178 258,977 INDIO 806,631 563,938 356,111 770,697 7,500 2,504,878 2,324,733 4,829,611 JURUPA VALLEY 932,248 651,760 410,821 890,718 10,000 2,895,546 2,686,762 5,582,308 LAKE ELSINORE 639,119 446,826 283,155 610,648 7,500 1,987,248 1,841,959 3,829,206 LA QUINTA 337,253 235,783 151,684 322,229 6,000 1,052,948 971,972 2,024,920 MENIFEE 977,100 683,117 430,356 933,572 10,000 3,034,146 2,816,029 5,850,175 MORENO VALLEY 1,849,603 1,293,108 810,356 1,767,207 10,000 5,730,275 5,330,606 11,060,881 MURRIETA 983,032 687,265 432,939 939,240 10,000 3,052,476 2,833,125 5,885,601 NORCO 236,732 165,505 107,904 226,186 6,000 742,326 682,267 1,424,593 PALM DESERT 450,180 314,733 200,866 430,125 7,500 1,403,404 1,297,430 2,700,834 PALM SPRINGS 392,549 274,441 175,766 375,061 6,000 1,223,818 1,131,336 2,355,154 PERRIS 701,057 490,128 310,131 669,826 7,500 2,178,643 2,020,465 4,199,108 RANCHO MIRAGE 151,066 105,615 70,594 144,337 4,000 475,611 435,377 910,988 RIVERSIDE 2,808,802 1,963,710 1,228,115 2,683,675 10,000 8,694,302 8,095,042 16,789,343 SAN JACINTO 480,434 335,884 214,043 459,032 7,500 1,496,893 1,384,623 2,881,516 TEMECULA 975,200 681,789 429,528 931,757 10,000 3,028,274 2,810,553 5,838,827 WILDOMAR 326,073 227,967 146,814 311,547 6,000 1,018,401 939,751 1,958,153 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 10 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
CITRUS HEIGHTS 778,908 544,556 358,388 744,209 7,500 2,433,561 2,244,834 4,678,395 ELK GROVE 1,571,802 1,098,889 718,326 1,501,781 10,000 4,900,799 4,529,975 9,430,774 FOLSOM 759,221 530,792 349,452 725,399 7,500 2,372,364 2,188,095 4,560,459 GALT 226,946 158,664 107,823 216,836 6,000 716,269 654,064 1,370,332 ISLETON 7,060 4,936 8,005 6,745 1,000 27,745 20,346 48,091 RANCHO CORDOVA 720,318 503,594 331,791 688,229 7,500 2,251,432 2,075,975 4,327,407 SACRAMENTO 4,619,937 3,229,924 2,102,040 4,414,128 20,000 14,386,028 13,314,782 27,700,810
SAN BENITO COUNTY
HOLLISTER 380,871 266,278 161,359 363,904 6,000 1,178,412 1,097,682 2,276,094 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 18,506 12,938 12,407 17,681 1,000 62,532 53,334 115,867
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADELANTO 325,558 227,606 142,539 311,055 6,000 1,012,758 938,267 1,951,025 APPLE VALLEY 674,950 471,876 290,361 644,882 7,500 2,089,570 1,945,224 4,034,793 BARSTOW 226,733 158,515 100,727 216,632 6,000 708,607 653,450 1,362,057 BIG BEAR LAKE 44,817 31,333 23,762 418,347 2,000 520,259 129,165 649,423 CHINO 827,055 578,217 354,715 790,212 7,500 2,557,699 2,383,595 4,941,294 CHINO HILLS 696,830 487,173 299,619 665,788 7,500 2,156,910 2,008,283 4,165,193 COLTON 477,939 334,140 207,009 456,647 7,500 1,483,235 1,377,432 2,860,667 FONTANA 1,898,994 1,327,638 808,236 1,814,397 10,000 5,859,266 5,472,951 11,332,217 GRAND TERRACE 116,701 81,589 54,174 111,502 3,000 366,966 336,335 703,301 HESPERIA 888,363 621,078 380,653 848,788 10,000 2,748,882 2,560,285 5,309,167 HIGHLAND 505,573 353,460 218,701 483,051 7,500 1,568,284 1,457,075 3,025,360 LOMA LINDA 224,024 156,621 99,581 214,044 6,000 700,272 645,644 1,345,916 MONTCLAIR 337,999 236,304 147,802 322,942 6,000 1,051,047 974,122 2,025,169 NEEDLES 43,778 30,607 23,322 41,828 1,000 140,535 126,170 266,705 ONTARIO 1,604,764 1,121,934 683,752 1,533,275 10,000 4,953,726 4,624,974 9,578,700 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1,549,202 1,083,089 660,245 1,480,188 10,000 4,782,725 4,464,843 9,247,568 REDLANDS 647,022 452,351 278,546 618,199 7,500 2,003,618 1,864,736 3,868,354 RIALTO 924,753 646,520 396,049 883,557 10,000 2,860,879 2,665,162 5,526,041 SAN BERNARDINO 1,984,189 1,387,200 844,281 1,895,797 10,000 6,121,466 5,718,484 11,839,951 TWENTYNINE PALMS 233,775 163,438 103,707 223,360 6,000 730,280 673,744 1,404,024 UPLAND 701,146 490,190 301,445 669,911 7,500 2,170,192 2,020,721 4,190,913 VICTORVILLE 1,218,272 851,727 520,233 1,164,000 10,000 3,764,232 3,511,092 7,275,324 YUCAIPA 486,357 340,025 210,570 464,691 7,500 1,509,143 1,401,693 2,910,837 YUCCA VALLEY 193,522 135,296 86,676 184,901 5,000 605,394 557,734 1,163,129 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 11 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CARLSBAD 1,018,605 712,135 472,674 973,229 10,000 3,186,642 2,935,648 6,122,291 CHULA VISTA 2,440,078 1,705,925 1,125,595 2,331,377 10,000 7,612,976 7,032,370 14,645,346 CORONADO 209,372 146,378 100,971 200,045 5,000 661,766 603,417 1,265,182 DEL MAR 34,996 24,467 20,875 33,437 1,000 114,774 100,859 215,634 EL CAJON 942,797 659,135 437,853 900,797 10,000 2,950,582 2,717,166 5,667,748 ENCINITAS 544,752 380,851 255,020 520,484 7,500 1,708,606 1,569,989 3,278,595 ESCONDIDO 1,339,644 936,581 620,135 1,279,965 10,000 4,186,325 3,860,889 8,047,214 IMPERIAL BEACH 235,391 164,568 112,921 224,904 6,000 743,785 678,402 1,422,187 LA MESA 537,070 375,481 251,491 513,145 7,500 1,684,687 1,547,851 3,232,539 LEMON GROVE 243,489 170,230 116,641 232,642 6,000 769,003 701,742 1,470,745 NATIONAL CITY 544,610 380,751 254,954 520,348 7,500 1,708,163 1,569,579 3,277,743 OCEANSIDE 1,534,737 1,072,976 709,747 1,466,367 10,000 4,793,828 4,423,153 9,216,980 POWAY 432,056 302,062 203,255 412,808 6,000 1,356,181 1,245,196 2,601,377 SAN DIEGO 12,258,359 8,570,152 5,635,404 11,712,273 20,000 38,196,188 35,328,918 73,525,106 SAN MARCOS 839,425 586,865 390,371 802,030 7,500 2,626,192 2,419,245 5,045,437 SANTEE 526,938 368,397 246,837 503,464 7,500 1,653,137 1,518,650 3,171,787 SOLANA BEACH 114,525 80,068 57,405 109,423 3,000 364,421 330,065 694,485 VISTA 886,533 619,800 412,009 847,040 7,500 2,772,882 2,555,013 5,327,895
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO 7,760,797 5,425,784 2,028,523 7,415,069 20,000 22,650,173 22,366,824 45,016,997
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
ESCALON 66,058 46,183 31,760 63,115 2,000 209,117 190,382 399,499 LATHROP 311,510 217,785 131,936 297,633 6,000 964,864 897,780 1,862,644 LODI 588,681 411,563 245,058 562,456 7,500 1,815,258 1,696,594 3,511,852 MANTECA 788,569 551,310 326,638 753,440 7,500 2,427,458 2,272,678 4,700,136 RIPON 141,876 99,189 62,704 135,555 4,000 443,323 408,889 852,212 STOCKTON 2,872,285 2,008,092 1,177,063 2,744,330 10,000 8,811,770 8,278,001 17,089,771 TRACY 849,060 593,601 351,326 811,236 7,500 2,612,723 2,447,013 5,059,736
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 162,815 113,828 86,683 155,561 4,000 522,887 469,236 992,123 ATASCADERO 273,335 191,096 142,266 261,158 6,000 873,855 787,758 1,661,614 EL PASO DE ROBLES 278,494 194,703 144,861 266,088 6,000 890,146 802,627 1,692,773 GROVER BEACH 113,264 79,186 61,763 108,219 3,000 365,432 326,431 691,863 MORRO BAY 93,684 65,497 51,916 89,510 3,000 303,607 269,999 573,606 PISMO BEACH 71,466 49,964 40,742 68,282 2,000 232,454 205,967 438,422 SAN LUIS OBISPO 424,357 296,679 218,219 405,453 6,000 1,350,707 1,223,008 2,573,715 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 12 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL
SAN MATEO COUNTY
ATHERTON 61,991 43,340 32,032 59,230 2,000 198,593 178,660 377,253 BELMONT 249,750 174,607 114,512 238,624 6,000 783,492 719,785 1,503,277 BRISBANE 43,095 30,129 23,731 41,175 1,000 139,129 124,200 263,329 BURLINGAME 277,526 194,026 126,714 265,163 6,000 869,430 799,838 1,669,267 COLMA 12,938 9,045 10,484 12,362 1,000 45,829 37,288 83,117 DALY CITY 931,218 651,039 413,874 889,734 10,000 2,895,864 2,683,794 5,579,658 EAST PALO ALTO 266,781 186,514 121,994 254,897 6,000 836,187 768,871 1,605,058 FOSTER CITY 299,229 209,199 136,248 285,899 6,000 936,575 862,386 1,798,960 HALF MOON BAY 104,384 72,978 50,655 99,734 3,000 330,751 300,838 631,589 HILLSBOROUGH 101,028 70,631 49,180 96,527 3,000 320,366 291,164 611,530 MENLO PARK 303,314 212,055 138,042 289,802 6,000 949,213 874,158 1,823,371 MILLBRAE 207,152 144,826 95,800 197,924 5,000 650,702 597,019 1,247,720 PACIFICA 343,496 240,147 155,694 328,194 6,000 1,073,530 989,964 2,063,494 PORTOLA VALLEY 39,418 27,558 22,116 37,662 1,000 127,755 113,604 241,359 REDWOOD CITY 741,310 518,270 330,449 708,286 7,500 2,305,816 2,136,476 4,442,291 SAN BRUNO 390,853 273,256 176,497 373,441 6,000 1,220,046 1,126,448 2,346,494 SAN CARLOS 273,042 190,891 124,744 260,878 6,000 855,555 786,914 1,642,469 SAN MATEO 939,067 656,528 417,322 897,234 10,000 2,920,151 2,706,417 5,626,568 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 588,557 411,476 263,347 562,338 7,500 1,833,217 1,696,236 3,529,452 WOODSIDE 47,144 32,960 25,510 45,044 2,000 152,657 135,870 288,527
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
BUELLTON 45,732 31,972 21,023 43,695 2,000 144,422 131,801 276,223 CARPINTERIA 116,816 81,669 46,239 111,612 3,000 359,337 336,667 696,005 GOLETA 290,331 202,978 107,792 277,397 6,000 884,499 836,742 1,721,241 GUADALUPE 75,613 52,863 31,623 72,245 2,000 234,344 217,919 452,263 LOMPOC 394,218 275,609 144,645 376,656 6,000 1,197,128 1,136,147 2,333,275 SANTA BARBARA 776,786 543,072 280,357 742,181 7,500 2,349,896 2,238,717 4,588,613 SANTA MARIA 973,779 680,796 350,238 930,399 10,000 2,945,213 2,806,458 5,751,670 SOLVANG 51,682 36,132 23,134 49,379 2,000 162,326 148,948 311,274 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 13 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CAMPBELL 389,707 272,455 164,363 372,346 6,000 1,204,872 1,123,146 2,328,018 CUPERTINO 537,745 375,952 224,977 513,790 7,500 1,659,964 1,549,796 3,209,761 GILROY 533,492 372,979 223,235 509,726 7,500 1,646,932 1,537,538 3,184,469 LOS ALTOS 281,203 196,596 119,937 268,676 6,000 872,411 810,433 1,682,844 LOS ALTOS HILLS 75,507 52,789 35,716 72,143 2,000 238,154 217,612 455,766 LOS GATOS 298,066 208,386 126,841 284,787 6,000 924,080 859,033 1,783,113 MILPITAS 728,283 509,163 302,992 695,840 7,500 2,243,777 2,098,932 4,342,709 MONTE SERENO 31,249 21,847 17,595 29,857 1,000 101,547 90,060 191,606 MORGAN HILL 407,520 284,909 171,657 389,366 6,000 1,259,452 1,174,484 2,433,936 MOUNTAIN VIEW 742,376 519,015 308,762 709,304 7,500 2,286,957 2,139,547 4,426,503 PALO ALTO 608,279 425,264 253,857 581,181 7,500 1,876,081 1,753,076 3,629,158 SAN JOSE 9,020,521 6,306,491 3,698,204 8,618,674 20,000 27,663,890 25,997,382 53,661,272 SANTA CLARA 1,176,385 822,443 486,465 1,123,979 10,000 3,619,272 3,390,373 7,009,645 SARATOGA 277,091 193,722 118,253 264,747 6,000 859,814 798,584 1,658,398 SUNNYVALE 1,388,093 970,453 573,147 1,326,256 10,000 4,267,949 4,000,520 8,268,470
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
CAPITOLA 87,495 61,170 38,398 83,597 2,000 272,659 252,161 524,820 SANTA CRUZ 574,810 401,866 225,525 549,204 7,500 1,758,905 1,656,619 3,415,523 SCOTTS VALLEY 109,117 76,287 46,701 104,256 3,000 339,361 314,479 653,840 WATSONVILLE 459,770 321,438 181,350 439,288 7,500 1,409,346 1,325,070 2,734,416
SHASTA COUNTY
ANDERSON 99,136 69,309 57,240 94,720 3,000 323,405 285,713 609,118 REDDING 833,262 582,556 445,574 796,142 7,500 2,665,035 2,401,484 5,066,519 SHASTA LAKE 91,784 64,168 53,351 87,695 3,000 299,998 264,523 564,520
SIERRA COUNTY
LOYALTON 6,607 4,619 6,382 22,567 1,000 41,175 19,041 60,216
SISKIYOU COUNTY
DORRIS 7,628 5,333 8,731 7,288 1,000 29,980 21,984 51,963 DUNSMUIR 15,140 10,585 12,602 40,324 1,000 79,651 43,635 123,286 ETNA 6,074 4,246 7,930 5,803 1,000 25,054 17,505 42,559 FORT JONES 6,163 4,309 7,976 5,888 1,000 25,335 17,761 43,096 MONTAGUE 10,922 7,636 10,428 10,436 1,000 40,423 31,479 71,901 MOUNT SHASTA 28,807 20,140 19,644 95,959 1,000 165,550 83,022 248,571 TULELAKE 8,001 5,594 8,923 7,644 1,000 31,162 23,059 54,220 WEED 25,770 18,016 18,079 24,622 1,000 87,487 74,269 161,756 YREKA 69,486 48,579 40,606 67,056 2,000 227,727 200,260 427,988 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 14 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL
SOLANO COUNTY
BENICIA 240,532 168,163 109,757 229,817 6,000 754,269 693,220 1,447,489 DIXON 168,880 118,068 78,491 161,356 4,000 530,795 486,715 1,017,511 FAIRFIELD 1,070,092 748,130 471,737 1,022,421 10,000 3,322,380 3,084,033 6,406,412 RIO VISTA 88,711 62,020 43,509 84,759 2,000 281,000 255,668 536,667 SUISUN CITY 261,604 182,895 118,952 249,950 6,000 819,401 753,951 1,573,352 VACAVILLE 908,369 635,066 401,169 867,903 10,000 2,822,507 2,617,945 5,440,452 VALLEJO 1,117,022 780,941 492,215 1,067,261 10,000 3,467,440 3,219,288 6,686,728
SONOMA COUNTY
CLOVERDALE 79,982 55,918 39,766 76,419 2,000 254,084 230,510 484,595 COTATI 67,310 47,058 34,226 64,312 2,000 214,906 193,990 408,897 HEALDSBURG 100,397 70,190 48,691 95,925 3,000 318,203 289,347 607,550 PETALUMA 531,165 371,352 237,009 507,503 7,500 1,654,529 1,530,832 3,185,362 ROHNERT PARK 391,279 273,554 175,855 373,848 6,000 1,220,536 1,127,676 2,348,212 SANTA ROSA 1,580,815 1,105,191 695,884 1,510,393 10,000 4,902,282 4,555,951 9,458,234 SEBASTOPOL 66,795 46,698 34,001 63,820 2,000 213,314 192,506 405,820 SONOMA 95,620 66,850 46,602 91,360 3,000 303,432 275,578 579,011 WINDSOR 232,753 162,724 106,553 222,385 6,000 730,415 670,801 1,401,216
STANISLAUS COUNTY
CERES 435,102 304,191 180,860 415,719 6,000 1,341,872 1,253,974 2,595,846 HUGHSON 67,177 46,965 31,983 64,184 2,000 212,310 193,606 405,916 MODESTO 1,944,939 1,359,760 791,803 1,858,296 10,000 5,964,798 5,605,366 11,570,164 NEWMAN 109,721 76,709 49,198 104,833 3,000 343,461 316,219 659,680 OAKDALE 205,811 143,888 88,080 196,643 5,000 639,423 593,154 1,232,577 PATTERSON 215,935 150,966 92,176 206,315 5,000 670,392 622,329 1,292,721 RIVERBANK 220,304 154,020 93,944 210,489 5,000 683,757 634,921 1,318,678 TURLOCK 640,114 447,521 263,817 611,598 7,500 1,970,549 1,844,825 3,815,374 WATERFORD 80,799 56,489 37,495 77,200 2,000 253,982 232,865 486,847
SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 84,493 59,071 37,719 80,729 2,000 264,012 243,511 507,523 YUBA CITY 623,206 435,700 247,602 595,444 7,500 1,909,452 1,796,097 3,705,550
TEHAMA COUNTY
CORNING 73,091 51,100 32,999 69,835 2,000 229,025 210,651 439,676 RED BLUFF 131,628 92,025 55,582 125,764 3,000 407,999 379,356 787,355 TEHAMA 3,863 2,701 6,290 3,691 1,000 17,544 11,133 28,677
TRINITY COUNTY
12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 15 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2024 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5)Sec2105 (3)Sec2106 (3)Sec2107 (3)Sec2107.5 (4)HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL
TULARE COUNTY
DINUBA 226,164 158,118 90,294 216,089 6,000 696,665 651,812 1,348,477 EXETER 91,943 64,280 39,556 87,847 3,000 286,627 264,983 551,610 FARMERSVILLE 92,210 64,466 39,657 88,102 3,000 287,435 265,751 553,186 LINDSAY 112,749 78,826 47,421 107,726 3,000 349,723 324,946 674,669 PORTERVILLE 556,340 388,952 215,106 531,556 7,500 1,699,455 1,603,387 3,302,842 TULARE 618,731 432,572 238,691 591,168 7,500 1,888,661 1,783,199 3,671,860 VISALIA 1,270,113 887,971 484,925 1,213,532 10,000 3,866,542 3,660,500 7,527,042 WOODLAKE 68,474 47,872 30,684 65,423 2,000 214,453 197,343 411,795
TUOLUMNE COUNTY
SONORA 46,167 32,277 32,560 44,110 2,000 157,114 133,055 290,168
VENTURA COUNTY
CAMARILLO 628,303 439,264 281,244 600,314 7,500 1,956,625 1,810,787 3,767,412 FILLMORE 150,063 104,913 70,825 143,378 4,000 473,179 432,485 905,664 MOORPARK 321,553 224,807 146,278 307,229 6,000 1,005,867 926,725 1,932,592 OJAI 67,976 47,524 34,709 64,948 2,000 217,157 195,909 413,066 OXNARD 1,790,640 1,251,885 792,654 1,710,871 10,000 5,556,050 5,160,673 10,716,723 PORT HUENEME 197,100 137,798 91,521 188,320 5,000 619,739 568,048 1,187,787 SAN BUENAVENTURA 977,358 683,297 434,822 933,819 10,000 3,039,296 2,816,772 5,856,068 SANTA PAULA 279,036 195,082 127,571 266,605 6,000 874,294 804,189 1,678,483 SIMI VALLEY 1,120,219 783,176 497,679 1,070,316 10,000 3,481,389 3,228,501 6,709,891 THOUSAND OAKS 1,124,366 786,075 499,503 1,074,278 10,000 3,494,222 3,240,453 6,734,675
YOLO COUNTY
DAVIS 574,420 401,592 265,297 548,830 7,500 1,797,640 1,655,493 3,453,132 WEST SACRAMENTO 481,180 336,406 223,013 459,744 7,500 1,507,843 1,386,773 2,894,616 WINTERS 66,902 46,773 35,140 63,921 2,000 214,736 192,813 407,549 WOODLAND 531,742 371,756 245,943 508,054 7,500 1,664,996 1,532,496 3,197,492
YUBA COUNTY
MARYSVILLE 117,118 81,880 44,150 111,901 3,000 358,049 337,538 695,587 WHEATLAND 33,842 23,660 16,170 32,334 1,000 107,006 97,532 204,538 Statewide Total 294,096,000$ 205,610,500$ 122,223,336$ 286,218,500$ 2,709,500$ 910,857,836$ 847,592,500$ 1,758,450,336$ Notes:
4. Str&HwysCode § 2107.5 amounts are typically paid by the State Controller once per year in July.
5. Str&HwysCode § 2103 allocations replace the former Prop42 TCRF revenues. Previously adjusted annually by the BOE until July 2019.
3. Str&HwysCode §§ 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107 and RMRA amounts are paid monthly. Includes special payments for snow removal.
1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."
2. Rolling Hills has no public streets and is therefore not eligible for HUTA or RMRA allocations. 12 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 16 of 16
COUNTY HUTA 2103 HUTA 2104 HUTA 2105 HUTA 2106 RMRA TOTAL ALAMEDA $8,611,646 $13,959,339 $6,336,223 $422,066 $23,419,766 $52,749,041 ALPINE $167,164 $289,540 $136,781 $20,914 $454,609 $1,069,009 AMADOR $846,038 $736,432 $539,528 $198,955 $2,300,838 $4,621,790 BUTTE $2,809,146 $2,499,325 $1,791,424 $419,396 $7,639,601 $15,158,893 CALAVERAS $1,281,006 $1,041,899 $816,912 $335,927 $3,483,754 $6,959,498 COLUSA $992,529 $609,447 $632,947 $120,258 $2,699,228 $5,054,410 CONTRA COSTA $7,270,390 $11,334,019 $5,394,535 $910,024 $19,772,157 $44,681,124 DEL NORTE $516,569 $337,377 $329,422 $113,814 $1,404,834 $2,702,015 EL DORADO $2,700,780 $3,689,913 $1,998,300 $845,654 $7,344,895 $16,579,543 FRESNO $9,468,693 $9,862,354 $6,038,294 $1,230,317 $25,750,544 $52,350,203 GLENN $1,209,474 $748,696 $771,295 $142,147 $3,289,220 $6,160,833 HUMBOLDT $2,283,963 $1,722,396 $1,456,509 $392,806 $6,211,341 $12,067,015 IMPERIAL $4,268,998 $2,430,210 $2,722,388 $434,254 $11,609,734 $21,465,585 INYO $1,415,245 $964,362 $902,518 $126,724 $3,848,825 $7,257,674 KERN $8,723,202 $8,821,808 $5,562,886 $1,983,448 $23,723,148 $48,814,492 KINGS $1,803,211 $1,357,525 $1,149,928 $228,616 $4,903,915 $9,443,196 LAKE $1,261,354 $1,011,408 $804,380 $333,393 $3,430,310 $6,840,844 LASSEN $1,215,310 $932,126 $775,017 $126,912 $3,305,090 $6,354,454 LOS ANGELES $52,583,499 $84,556,500 $38,444,270 $2,700,942 $143,003,231 $321,288,442 MADERA $2,672,996 $1,776,060 $1,704,600 $510,593 $7,269,335 $13,933,584 MARIN $1,958,845 $2,602,864 $1,277,091 $295,766 $5,327,167 $11,461,734 MARIPOSA $805,970 $535,655 $513,976 $133,093 $2,191,873 $4,180,568 MENDOCINO $1,862,171 $1,312,784 $1,187,528 $396,375 $5,064,259 $9,823,116 MERCED $3,583,684 $2,819,968 $2,285,356 $593,683 $9,745,993 $19,028,684 MODOC $1,190,615 $866,510 $759,269 $63,103 $3,237,932 $6,117,429 MONO $872,669 $775,292 $556,511 $31,366 $2,373,262 $4,609,100 MONTEREY $3,983,507 $4,472,949 $2,540,328 $902,108 $10,833,329 $22,732,220 NAPA $1,376,434 $1,595,252 $877,767 $311,634 $3,743,274 $7,904,360 NEVADA $1,446,026 $1,706,177 $922,147 $313,063 $3,932,534 $8,319,947 ORANGE $18,644,709 $31,512,242 $14,228,960 $783,408 $50,705,139 $115,874,457 PLACER $4,127,386 $6,267,657 $3,145,804 $872,414 $11,224,616 $25,637,876 PLUMAS $974,908 $1,043,462 $621,710 $152,423 $2,651,308 $5,443,811 RIVERSIDE $16,210,993 $23,805,564 $11,222,236 $1,665,685 $44,086,537 $96,991,016 County HUTA and RMRA Revenue Estimates - FY 2023-24
CSAC Current Year Estimates - Based on January Budget revenue estimates - 1/11/24
COUNTY HUTA 2103 HUTA 2104 HUTA 2105 HUTA 2106 RMRA TOTAL SACRAMENTO $11,289,791 $15,211,674 $7,663,950 $2,183,291 $30,703,103 $67,051,809 SAN BENITO $965,436 $824,686 $615,670 $166,375 $2,625,549 $5,197,716 SAN BERNARDINO $15,223,796 $22,223,441 $10,450,873 $1,497,037 $41,401,809 $90,796,955 SAN DIEGO $21,023,004 $32,611,430 $15,162,849 $1,803,880 $57,173,021 $127,774,184 SAN FRANCISCO*$3,950,747 $5,016,065 $2,519,436 $9,600 $10,744,237 $22,240,084 SAN JOAQUIN $6,455,655 $7,982,734 $4,116,845 $926,869 $17,556,449 $37,038,551 SAN LUIS OBISPO $3,487,962 $3,464,726 $2,224,313 $668,041 $9,485,671 $19,330,713 SAN MATEO $4,668,327 $7,454,773 $3,410,329 $285,693 $12,695,728 $28,514,850 SANTA BARBARA $3,512,842 $4,510,649 $2,353,733 $831,648 $9,553,334 $20,762,206 SANTA CLARA $10,795,896 $17,424,162 $7,811,703 $306,158 $29,359,932 $65,697,850 SANTA CRUZ $2,273,375 $2,853,212 $1,542,606 $648,061 $6,182,547 $13,499,800 SHASTA $2,684,222 $2,555,508 $1,711,759 $415,138 $7,299,864 $14,666,491 SIERRA $477,811 $433,692 $304,706 $35,209 $1,299,430 $2,550,849 SISKIYOU $1,930,018 $1,549,147 $1,230,794 $206,176 $5,248,771 $10,164,905 SOLANO $3,330,603 $4,650,212 $2,137,342 $200,940 $9,057,727 $19,376,825 SONOMA $4,865,940 $5,822,134 $3,103,065 $947,131 $13,233,146 $27,971,415 STANISLAUS $5,008,307 $5,746,363 $3,193,855 $730,768 $13,620,321 $28,299,613 SUTTER $1,534,627 $1,214,782 $978,649 $214,198 $4,173,489 $8,115,745 TEHAMA $1,699,431 $1,013,481 $1,083,747 $264,278 $4,621,681 $8,682,618 TRINITY $894,865 $694,485 $570,666 $92,838 $2,433,626 $4,686,479 TULARE $6,047,509 $4,826,647 $3,856,565 $759,342 $16,446,477 $31,936,541 TUOLUMNE $1,187,427 $1,069,298 $757,236 $330,179 $3,229,263 $6,573,403 VENTURA $5,712,404 $8,879,949 $4,192,319 $635,410 $15,535,144 $34,955,227 YOLO $2,167,334 $2,308,376 $1,382,134 $183,766 $5,894,164 $11,935,773 YUBA $1,238,044 $922,264 $789,515 $302,444 $3,366,918 $6,619,184 TOTALS $291,564,500 $389,261,000 $201,611,500 $32,755,750 $792,923,000 $1,708,115,750 * county share only
C:\Users\mneuburger\OneDrive - California Counties Foundation\Desktop\[HUTA and RMRA 2023-24 Worksheet 1.11.24.xlsx]Allocations 2103-2106 County HUTA and RMRA Revenue Estimates - FY 2023-24
CSAC Current Year Estimates - Based on January Budget revenue estimates - 1/11/24
COUNTY HUTA 2103 HUTA 2104 HUTA 2105 HUTA 2106 RMRA TOTAL ALAMEDA $8,686,417 $14,247,249 $6,464,581 $430,405 $25,034,484 $54,863,136 ALPINE $168,615 $289,691 $136,903 $21,143 $485,953 $1,102,305 AMADOR $853,383 $750,259 $550,047 $202,783 $2,459,473 $4,815,945 BUTTE $2,833,536 $2,548,797 $1,826,351 $427,680 $8,166,327 $15,802,691 CALAVERAS $1,292,128 $1,060,109 $832,839 $342,523 $3,723,947 $7,251,547 COLUSA $1,001,147 $611,312 $645,287 $122,495 $2,885,331 $5,265,572 CONTRA COSTA $7,333,515 $11,566,831 $5,503,286 $928,227 $21,135,384 $46,467,242 DEL NORTE $521,054 $343,843 $335,845 $115,921 $1,501,692 $2,818,356 EL DORADO $2,724,230 $3,743,014 $2,028,463 $862,555 $7,851,302 $17,209,564 FRESNO $9,550,905 $10,061,324 $6,156,020 $1,254,995 $27,525,962 $54,549,205 GLENN $1,219,975 $750,992 $786,333 $144,827 $3,516,001 $6,418,128 HUMBOLDT $2,303,793 $1,755,995 $1,484,906 $400,552 $6,639,594 $12,584,840 IMPERIAL $4,306,063 $2,480,039 $2,775,466 $442,839 $12,410,188 $22,414,595 INYO $1,427,533 $966,119 $920,114 $129,091 $4,114,189 $7,557,047 KERN $8,798,941 $9,000,615 $5,671,343 $2,023,350 $25,358,783 $50,853,032 KINGS $1,818,867 $1,385,177 $1,172,348 $233,044 $5,242,024 $9,851,461 LAKE $1,272,306 $1,031,861 $820,062 $339,938 $3,666,818 $7,130,986 LASSEN $1,225,861 $934,265 $790,127 $129,283 $3,532,965 $6,612,502 LOS ANGELES $53,040,053 $86,298,713 $39,222,703 $2,755,349 $152,862,846 $334,179,664 MADERA $2,696,204 $1,811,801 $1,737,834 $520,721 $7,770,532 $14,537,093 MARIN $1,975,852 $2,655,872 $1,302,558 $301,551 $5,694,458 $11,930,291 MARIPOSA $812,968 $537,303 $523,997 $135,590 $2,342,996 $4,352,854 MENDOCINO $1,878,339 $1,338,678 $1,210,680 $404,193 $5,413,423 $10,245,314 MERCED $3,614,799 $2,877,854 $2,329,913 $605,491 $10,417,948 $19,846,005 MODOC $1,200,953 $867,364 $774,072 $64,185 $3,461,177 $6,367,751 MONO $880,246 $776,336 $567,361 $31,806 $2,536,891 $4,792,640 MONTEREY $4,018,093 $4,564,626 $2,589,855 $920,150 $11,580,252 $23,672,977 NAPA $1,388,384 $1,627,617 $894,881 $317,739 $4,001,361 $8,229,982 NEVADA $1,458,581 $1,735,436 $940,126 $319,197 $4,203,670 $8,657,010 ORANGE $18,806,591 $32,163,306 $14,517,841 $799,051 $54,201,095 $120,487,885 PLACER $4,163,222 $6,372,636 $3,198,670 $889,856 $11,998,517 $26,622,901 PLUMAS $983,373 $1,045,422 $633,831 $155,310 $2,834,107 $5,652,043 RIVERSIDE $16,351,744 $24,295,098 $11,448,834 $1,699,164 $47,126,163 $100,921,004 County HUTA and RMRA Revenue Estimates - FY 2024-25
CSAC Budget Year Estimates - Based on January Budget revenue estimates - 1/11/24
COUNTY HUTA 2103 HUTA 2104 HUTA 2105 HUTA 2106 RMRA TOTAL SACRAMENTO $11,387,814 $15,525,746 $7,819,069 $2,227,233 $32,819,984 $69,779,845 SAN BENITO $973,819 $841,211 $627,673 $169,544 $2,806,572 $5,418,819 SAN BERNARDINO $15,355,976 $22,663,918 $10,654,621 $1,527,106 $44,256,331 $94,457,952 SAN DIEGO $21,205,535 $33,282,842 $15,469,465 $1,840,152 $61,114,917 $132,912,912 SAN FRANCISCO*$3,985,049 $5,119,248 $2,568,557 $9,600 $11,485,017 $23,167,471 SAN JOAQUIN $6,511,706 $8,147,355 $4,197,109 $945,412 $18,766,910 $38,568,492 SAN LUIS OBISPO $3,518,246 $3,535,323 $2,267,679 $681,352 $10,139,678 $20,142,278 SAN MATEO $4,708,859 $7,608,479 $3,479,344 $291,275 $13,571,058 $29,659,015 SANTA BARBARA $3,543,342 $4,602,697 $2,400,806 $848,266 $10,212,006 $21,607,116 SANTA CLARA $10,889,631 $17,783,954 $7,970,195 $312,153 $31,384,205 $68,340,137 SANTA CRUZ $2,293,113 $2,910,528 $1,573,019 $660,968 $6,608,813 $14,046,442 SHASTA $2,707,527 $2,604,226 $1,745,132 $423,336 $7,803,166 $15,283,388 SIERRA $481,960 $434,055 $310,647 $35,727 $1,389,022 $2,651,410 SISKIYOU $1,946,775 $1,552,970 $1,254,790 $210,150 $5,610,657 $10,575,342 SOLANO $3,359,521 $4,745,937 $2,180,491 $204,808 $9,682,229 $20,172,986 SONOMA $4,908,188 $5,941,029 $3,163,564 $966,083 $14,145,529 $29,124,393 STANISLAUS $5,051,792 $5,864,749 $3,256,124 $745,346 $14,559,398 $29,477,410 SUTTER $1,547,951 $1,239,483 $997,730 $218,334 $4,461,237 $8,464,735 TEHAMA $1,714,187 $1,017,933 $1,104,876 $269,427 $4,940,331 $9,046,753 TRINITY $902,635 $695,596 $581,792 $94,520 $2,601,417 $4,875,959 TULARE $6,100,016 $4,924,176 $3,931,755 $774,499 $17,580,409 $33,310,856 TUOLUMNE $1,197,737 $1,087,389 $771,999 $336,659 $3,451,910 $6,845,695 VENTURA $5,762,002 $9,061,833 $4,276,596 $648,061 $16,606,243 $36,354,735 YOLO $2,186,152 $2,355,685 $1,409,080 $187,286 $6,300,548 $12,438,752 YUBA $1,248,793 $940,083 $804,908 $308,364 $3,599,056 $6,901,204 TOTALS $294,096,000 $396,982,000 $205,610,500 $33,406,664 $847,592,500 $1,777,687,664 * county share only
C:\Users\mneuburger\OneDrive - California Counties Foundation\Desktop\[HUTA and RMRA 2023-24 Worksheet 1.11.24.xlsx]Allocations 2103-2106 County HUTA and RMRA Revenue Estimates - FY 2024-25
CSAC Budget Year Estimates - Based on January Budget revenue estimates - 1/11/24
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ROAD
MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT
PROJECT LIST TO BE FUNDED BY THE ROAD REPAIR
AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017, SENATE BILL 1,
AND INCORPORATED INTO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
BUDGET
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB-1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017), was passed by the legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB-1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure residents of the City are made aware of the projects proposed for funding in their community and projects completed each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City must adopt, by Resolution, a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB-1, in the City budget, and must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City is projected to receive $2,806,458 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2024-2025 from SB-1; and
WHEREAS, this is the eighth year the City is receiving SB-1 funding which enables the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB-1; and
WHEREAS, City staff uses the Pavement Management Program to develop the SB- 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the communities priorities for transportation investment; and
WHEREAS, the funding from SB-1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate many roadways throughout the City this year and similar projects into the future; and
WHEREAS, the 2023 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s roads are in an “at-risk” condition and this revenue with other necessary revenues will help the City increase the overall quality of its road system, and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into a “good” condition; and
WHEREAS, the SB-1 project list and overall investment in the local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, and materials and practices will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2. The budget for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 will incorporate funding for the following list of proposed projects to be funded in-part or solely with Fiscal Year 2024- 2025 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:
Roadway Rehabilitation Project.
Description:
This project will include the surface seal of various roadways in the City of Santa Maria. The surface seal of roadways will be over previous dig-out areas’ arterials. Additionally, the project also includes installation of new striping and pavement markings.
Location:
Betteravia Road from E Street to US 101
S. Blosser Road from Donovan Road to Betteravia Road
Bradley Road from Main Street to Columbia Drive
Carlotti Drive from Nobel Way to Donovan Road
Depot Street from Fesler Street to Main Street
Hidden Pines Way from Blosser Road to Preisker Lane
Main street from Palisade Drive to Suey Road
Railroad Avenue from Donovan Road to Fesler Street
Suey Road from Donovan Road to Main Street
Bradley Road from Jones Street to Betteravia Road
College Drive from Donovan Road to Main Street
Cost and Funding:
Preliminary Engineer's Estimate: $ 3,100,000
SB-1 (FY 24/25): $ 2,806,458
Gas Tax: $ 293,542
Estimated Start Date: September 2024
Estimated Completion Date: December 2024
Estimated Useful Life: 5-10 years
3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 21st day of May 2024.
ATTEST:
Chief Deputy City Clerk
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
Interim City Manager
FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 21, 2024
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Interim City Manager Alex Posada
BY: Interim Director of Recreation and Parks Angela Oslund
SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolutions Approving the Engineer’s Reports and Intent to Levy and Collect the 2024 – 2025 Landscape Assessments
Description:
The City Council will consider the annual Engineer’s Reports for the City’s Landscape Maintenance Districts and Special Benefit Zones and setting the public hearing to consider the annual Districts’ assessments.
Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Adopt a Resolution approving the engineer’s reports for the 2024-25 landscape maintenance districts and special benefit zones assessment proceedings; and
2. Adopt a Resolution declaring its intention to levy and collect landscape maintenance assessments for fiscal year 2024-25 and setting a time and place for a public hearing for June 4, 2024 to consider the proposed assessments for the landscape maintenance districts and the 19 special benefit zones .
BACKGROUND:
During the 1980’s, the City of Santa Maria established four geographic Landscape Maintenance Districts with Broadway and Stowell serving as the center point. The four “Master Districts” consist of the following: the South Miller Street/South Colle ge Drive Landscape Maintenance District created with Resolution 81 -298 on August 4, 1981; the Northwest Landscape Maintenance District with Resolution 88 -154 on December 20, 1988; the Northeast Landscape Maintenance District with Resolution 89 -51 on May 2, 1989; and the Southwest Landscape Maintenance District with Resolution 89-50 on May 2, 1989. The creation of these districts enables the City of Santa Maria to levy and collect assessments for the purposes of maintaining the public landscaping and parks, and for nuisance abatement within each district.
Within the four “Master Districts,” there are currently 19 Special Benefit Zones (SBZ).
Each SBZ was created at the time when a new development was built, in order to provide
2 for the perpetual maintenance of additional public improvements associated with the development of each project. These public improvements include retention basins, parks, sidewalks, graffiti abatement, pest abatement, street trees, and all public thoroughfare landscaping. The cost of maintaining the public improvements vary, based on the type and extent of public improvements in a given subdivision. This cost is distributed among all assessed properties within the specific SBZ and collected annually through property taxes.
Under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“the Act”), the City is authorized to provide and maintain landscaping, public lighting, appurtenant facilities, and park and recreational improvements. By following the procedures set out in the Act, as well as Proposition 218 and its implementing legislation, the City can assess property owners for the special benefit received as a result of installing and maintaining these improvements.
The process of assessing property for improvements under the Act has several steps. A typical first step is annexing property into a particular part of the City’s system under the Act, and setting of the assessment for the first fiscal year. This is accomplished through the consent of the current property owners and action of the Council pursuant to an Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report correctly apportions the costs to specific property according to the special benefit received. If particular properties receive additional benefits, they are placed into a “zone” which receive s a particularized assessment amount according to the additional special benefit received.
Assessment law, in particular Proposition 218, allows only the special benefit received by properties to be assessed. General benefits received by the public are no t recoverable using assessments. The Engineer’s Report apportions or spreads these special benefit amounts to the properties to be assessed.
Amounts are assessable to property under the Act for one fiscal year. Each year at this time, the City conducts assessment proceedings under the Act. In order to collect assessments going forward, the City must not receive a majority protest. If the City wishes to increase assessments within the meaning of the law (i.e. above the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI), then the City must follow the specialized election proceedings under Proposition 218. In addition, Proposition 218 removes former provisions of statutory law that allowed public entities to be exempt from assessment.
DISCUSSION:
The process of annexation, calculating, and levying assessments in the Landscape Maintenance Districts is outlined in the California Streets and Highways Code, which the City of Santa Maria follows in these proceedings. The City of Santa Maria’s process for annexation, calculating, and levying of assessments has been refined by the City Attorney in compliance with state law and the most recent case law. The recommended action tonight is to meet the statutory requirements by the City Council: 1) adopting a Resolution approving the Engineer’s Reports for assessment proceedings; and 2) declaring the intent to levy and collect the property tax assessments for each of the four Landscape
3 Maintenance Districts and the SBZ’s, and set a public hearing for June 4, 2024, to consider the proposed landscape assessments for approval.
The Interim Director of Finance has determined that the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose by 3.5 percent in calendar year 2023, requiring that the 2024 district and SBZ assessments be increased by 3.5 percent to keep pace with increased costs. In addition to the increase in CPI, state law has required the City to use the Department of Labor Statistics prevailing wage rates for our geographic area for all contracted services. This has had a significant impact on the rates being paid to our contractors. This increase will need to be addressed by future increases in assessment rates in order to keep pace with the prevailing wage requirement.
The proposed assessments are intended to provide adequate funding for district operations over the next fiscal year and are consistent with past City Council action. The action before the City Council not only authorizes the levying and collection of the property tax assessment for the Landscape Maintenance Districts and th e SBZs, but also authorizes the Interim Director of Finance to transfer funds out of appropriated reserves in order to finance operational costs (unanticipated expenses or project overages) in the districts during the next fiscal year.
Fiscal Considerations:
The attached supportive documents present the specific financing related to each of the Landscape Maintenance District Assessments for the “Master Districts” and the SBZs.
To summarize, the Landscape Maintenance Districts and the SBZs generate approximately $5.2 million in revenue to fund direct maintenance services and district operation costs. This revenue is collected from approximately 9,560 residential and 609 commercial properties in the districts. Since everyone who lives in the City of Santa Maria benefits from the well-kept, public easement landscaped areas, the City’s General Fund provides a financial contribution, known as the “City’s General Benefit," in the amount of $898,241. This contribution is made on behalf of the estimated 23,500 (commercial and residential) properties that existed prior to the creation of the Landscape Maintenance Districts. As new development occurs in older parts of the City, those properties are annexed into a Landscape Maintenance District or SBZ, so over time the General Benefit will begin to diminish.
During Fiscal Year 2023-24, the Landscape Maintenance Districts experienced an across the board increase in costs of providing daily operations, renovation, and project management. The most significant cost is irrigation water. In order to control the cost of water, staff is proposing to convert non-recreational turf to low-water use plantings. These conversions will result in long-term savings but require a significant upfront expenditure.
Accordingly, Landscape Maintenance Districts will continue to face increased costs.
In 2024, there will be additional revenue from the new projects at Centennial Gardens, Elements Mixed Use, Skyview Homes, and others, in their respective districts; however, there will also be additional cost associated with the new District Landscape.
4 Impact to the Community:
Landscaping along the City’s major arterials and surrounding residential and commercial developments in the City are a positive indication of the fine quality of life in Santa Maria and its aesthetic appeal. Accordingly, the City’s landscaping provides for the community’s enjoyment, neighborhood cohesiveness, and beauty. The assessments herein provide for perpetual care of these public areas and saf eguard the assets of surrounding property owners.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORTS FOR THE 2024-25 LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS AND SPECIAL BENEFIT ZONES
ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Section 22500, et seq. of the Streets and Highways Code) initiated proceedings and ordered the preparation of an Engineer’s Report for the assessment of certain property annexed to the Northeast, Northwest, Southwest, and South Miller Street/South College Drive Landscape Maintenance Districts, and the associated Special Benefit Zones; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer’s Reports were prepared as directed by City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Engineer’s Reports as presented and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received for the work to be performed, as set forth in the Reports; and
WHEREAS, the City Council accepts these assessments as the basis on which to provide service to the Northeast, Northwest, Sou thwest, and South Miller Street/South College Drive Landscape Maintenance Districts, and the 19 Special Benefit Zones.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitals are true and correct.
2. That the Engineer’s Reports, as presented, are hereby approved on a preliminary basis, and are ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Santa Maria as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.
3. That the necessary adjustments reflected in the Engineer’s Reports shall be made to the City of Santa Maria 2024-25 Budget Allocations for each Landscape Maintenance District and Special Benefit Zone and that the Director of Finance is authorized to make the necessary inter-fund transfers to landscape maintenance district operational budgets.
4. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.
2 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 21st day of May 2024.
ATTEST:
Chief Deputy City Clerk
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Head
_______________________________
Interim City Manager
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA,
CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 4, 2024, TO
CONSIDER THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR THE LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS AND THE 19 SPECIAL BENEFIT ZONES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, at this time proposes to initiate proceedings for the assessment of property annexed to the Northeast, Northwest, Southwest and South Miller Street/South College Drive Landscape Maintenance Districts and the 19 Special Benefit Zones (“Districts”), pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Section 22500, et seq. of the Streets and Highways Code); and
WHEREAS, the properties affected by these proceedings are described in Exhibit “E” and the boundaries of the Districts are shown on the map as Exhibit “F” and incorporated herein by reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitals are true.
2. That it is the intention of this legislative body to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 to pay costs and expenses for the maintenance of retention basins, parks, sidewalks, graffiti abatement, pest abatement, street trees, and all other public landscaping.
3. By the terms of Resolution Numbers 1994-96, 1994-97, 1994-98, and 1994- 99, dated June 7, 1994, the City Council adopted a formula for annual adjustment of assessments based on the Consumer Price Index Figures of the U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for Urban Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County Areas.*
4. The Director of Finance is authorized and directed to receive and appropriate assessments as reported in the Engineer’s Reports on Exhibit A-D. Additionally, the Director of Finance is authorized and directed to reallocate said appropriations and estimated revenues to reflect the final assessments as determined by the County.
5. That the improvements to be funded by the proposed assessment are generally described as follows: maintenance of retention basins, parks, sidewalks and public thoroughfare landscaping, street trees, graf fiti abatement, and pest abatement.
*U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for Urban Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County areas – includes Santa Maria
2 6. That the assessment districts affected by this Resolution of Intention are distinctively designated as follows: South Miller Street/South College Drive, Northeast, Northwest, and Southwest Landscape Maintenance Districts, and the 19 Special Benefit Zones.
7. That the property affected by the proposed assessments are described in Exhibit “E”, and the boundaries of the Districts are shown on the map as Exhibit “F”.
8. That said work will provide a special and direct benefit to the properties as described in the Engineer’s Reports previously approved by this Council.
9. The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to approve the transfer of funds from appropriated reserve accounts for the purpose of covering operational costs when needed.
10. That notice is hereby given that a public hearing on the questions of the proposed assessment is hereby scheduled at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers which is located at 110 East Cook Street in Santa Maria, California, on Tuesday, June 4, 2024.
11. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of the public hearing pursuant to Streets and Highways Code, Sections 22552 and 22553.
12. That the Engineer’s Reports pertaining to the proposed proceedings are on file with the Chief Deputy City Clerk and should be referred to for a full and detailed description of the improvements, Landscape Maintenance District Boundaries, and any Special Benefit Zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Districts.
//
//
//
//
//
3 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 21st day of May 2024.
ATTEST:
Chief Deputy City Clerk
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Head
_______________________________
Interim City Manager
Exhibit A: Engineer Report-Northwest
Exhibit B: Engineer Report-Northeast
Exhibit C: Engineer Report-South Miller Street/South College Drive Exhibit D: Engineer Report-Southwest
Exhibit E: FY 24-25 District Assessment Rolls
Exhibit F: Landscape Maintenance Districts Map
EXHIBIT A
Annual Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025
Northwest Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-9
Incorporating Special Benefit Zones:
Cherry Blossom
North Preisker Ranch
Intent to Levy Meeting: May 21, 2024
Public Hearing: June 4, 2024
City of Santa Maria
110 E. Cook Street
Santa Maria, CA 93454
Prepared by: Scott Christian, Operations Manager
- 2 -
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
This report and the enclosed descriptions, budgets, and diagrams outline the proposed improvements and assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-9 in the City of Santa Maria for Fiscal Year 2024/2025, which includes each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within said District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
- 3 -
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. - 4 - Report Content and Annual Proceedings ................................................................... - 4 - PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ........................................................................... - 8 - Zones of Benefit ......................................................................................................... - 9 - Part II – Method of Apportionment ............................................................................ - 11 - Benefit Analysis ........................................................................................................ - 12 - Assessment Methodology ........................................................................................ - 14 - Part III – Estimate of Costs .......................................................................................... - 16 - Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) ............................... - 18 - Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams................................................................................. - 19 - District Boundary Diagram ....................................................................................... - 20 - District Improvement Diagram (Northern Section) ................................................. - 21 - District Improvement Diagram (Southern Section) ................................................. - 22 - Cherry Blossom Special Benefit Zone ....................................................................... - 23 - North Preisker Ranch Special Benefit Zone ............................................................. - 24 - Part V - Assessment Rolls ............................................................................................ - 25 -
- 4 -
INTRODUCTION
The City of Santa Maria (“City”), under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”) and in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID (“California Constitution”) annually levies and collects special assessments for the City’s maintenance assessment district designated as Northwest Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-9 (hereafter referred to as “District”) to fund in whole or in part the maintenance and operation of landscaping improvements that provide special benefits to properties within the District.
The City Council on December 20, 1988, established the formation of the Northwest Landscape Maintenance District No. DS-9 for the purpose of financing the continued maintenance of the landscaping within the northwest quadrant of the City.
In accordance with the 1972 Act, the District also utilizes special benefit zones (“Zones”) to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements that provide special benefits to specific parcels and developments within the District. Within the boundaries of the District, some parcels may be assigned to a special benefit zone, each of which is associated with specific improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone that are in addition to the improvements pro portionally shared by properties throughout the District.
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025 in addition to the shared District improvements and assessments, parcels within the following Zones may be assessed for local improvements specific to the parcels and devel opments within each respective Zone:
Cherry Blossom Special Benefit Zone,
North Preisker Ranch Special Benefit Zone,
Report Content and Annual Proceedings
This Engineer’s Annual Report (the “Report”) has been prepared pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 4 and Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act, and presented to the City Council for their consideration and approval of the proposed improvements and services to be provided within the District and the levy and collection of annual assessments related thereto for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. This Report outlines the District improvements, the special benefit zones, the method of apportionment, and proposed assessments to be levied in connection with the special benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a source of funding to fund in whole or in part, the continued operation and maintenance of the landscaping improvements and services to be provided by the District for the properties within the District and specified Zones for which the properties receive special benefits.
Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the authorized District improvements and based upon available revenues
- 5 -
including assessment revenues, fund balances, general benefit contributions and any additional City contributions from available sources. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include, but are not limited to the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District; deficits or surpluses from prior years; revenues from other sources; and the collection of funds for operational reserves and/or periodic repairs, replacements and rehabilitation projects as authorized by the 1972 Act. The net annual cost to provide the improvements within the District plus each benefit Zone (if applicable) are allocated to the benefiting properties within the District and respective Zones as applicable, using a weighted method of apportionment (refer to Assessment Methodology in Section II, Method of Apportionment) that calculates the proportional special benefit and assessment for each parcel as compared to other properties that benefit from the District improvements and services. Thus, each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.
The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s Office. The Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the District assessments.
At a noticed annual Public Hearing, the City Council will accept all public comments and written protests regarding the District and the annual levy of assessments. Based on those public comments and written protests, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted.
Following final approval of the Report and confirmation of the assessments, the City Council will by Resolution, order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.
As required by the 1972 Act, this Engineer’s Report describes the improvements to be provided, maintained, and serviced by the District, an estimated budget for the District improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District for fiscal year 2024/2025.
Part I – Plans and Specifications: This section contains a general description of the District, special benefit zones (“Zones”), and the improvements and services that provide special benefits to the parcels within the District. The improvements, appurtenant facilities, and services that provide special benefits to the properties within the District and for which parcels are assessed may include, but not limited to the installation and maintenance of landscaping improvements within the public right-of-way of streets within the District, retention basins, parks, public facilities and related amenities as well as associated operational and incidental expenses, and the collection of fund balances authorized by the 1972 Act. The plans and specifications contained in this Report generally describe the nature and extent of the improvements. In conjunction with these general descriptions, a visual depiction of the improvements may be provided in the District Diagrams contained in Part IV of this Report. More detailed information regarding the specific
- 6 -
plans and specifications associated with the District improvements and Zone improvements are on file in the City Engineer’s Office and by reference are made part of this Report.
Part II – Method of Apportionment: This section includes a discussion of the special and general benefits associated with the improvements to be provided within the District (Benefit Analysis). This section of the Report also outlines the basis upon which the estimated costs to provide such improvements has been apportioned to each parcel of land therein in proportion to the special benefits to be received. (the method of calculating each property’s proportional special benefit assessment). This method of apportionment is consistent with the previously approved and adopted method of apportionment for the District.
Part III – Estimate of Costs: Identifies the estimated annual funding costs (Budgets) required for the maintenance and operation of the improvements in the District and Zones authorized by the 1972 Act and deemed appropriate to support the improvements, including, but not limited to, annual maintenance and service expenses, utility costs, and related incidental expenses. For fiscal year 202 4/2025 annual contract maintenance costs have increased by three percent (3.5%). Those improvements and/or costs determined to be of general benefit shall be funded by a City contribution. In addition to the general benefit costs, the City may provide additional funding to support the maintenance and operation of the improvements considered to be of special benefit, but City staff shall make the determination of which improvements, and the extent of the services and activities that shall be provided based on available revenues.
This section also identifies and outlines an Assessment Range Formula (inflationary adjust) previously approved and adopted for the District assessments that provides for an annual adjustment to the maximum assessment rates, which establishes limits on future assessments, but also provides for reasonable cost adjustments due to inflation.
Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams: This section of the Report contains a series of diagrams showing the boundaries of the District and Zones for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 which incorporate the parcels determined to receive special benefits from the District improvements. These diagrams may also provide a visual depiction of the location of the improvements being maintained. The lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land contained in the District and Zone diagrams are inclusive of the parcels listed in “Part V - Assessment Roll” of this Report and the corresponding County Assessor’s Parcel Maps for said parcels as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and shall incorporate all subsequent subdivisions, lot-line adjustments, or parcel changes therein. Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land within the District and Zones.
Part V – Assessment Roll: The assessment amounts to be levied and collected in fiscal year 2024/2025 for each parcel is based on the parcel’s calculated proportional special benefit as outlined in "Part II - Method
- 7 -
of Apportionment" and the annual assessment rates established by the estimated budgets in "Part III - Estimate of Costs" of this Report. Due to the number of parcels within the District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2024/2025 has been filed electronically with the City Clerk rather than displayed in this Report and by reference the listing of the Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and the corresponding assessment amounts are made part of this Report.
Note: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone of this Engineer’s Report is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Engineer’s Report and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, portions, zones, or subzones might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
- 8 -
PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The purpose of this District is to provide in part through annual assessments, funding for the installation, operation, and maintenance of landscaping improvements in specified parkways, medians, and roundabouts in the public right-of-way including street trees, and landscaping within specified public areas and public facilities including storm water retention basins that control subdivision water runoff, parks, and easements.
As authorized by the 1972 Act, the improvements provided by the District and associated with each Zone therein may incorporate various local landscaping improvements and related amenities that were either installed in direct connection with the development of properties within the District and each respective Zone or were installed for the benefit of those properties resulting from property development or potential development of those properties and are considered necessary elements for the development of such properties to their full and best use and these improvements are maintained and serviced for the special benefit of real property within the District and/or Zones. The work to be performed within the District and each respective Zone may include but is not limited to (as applicable), the personnel, materials, equipment, electricity, water, contract services, repair and rehabilitation of the improvements and incidental expenses required to operate the District and provide the improvements and services.
Improvements provided within the District and/or Zone may include but are not limited to landscaping and related facilities and amenities located within designated street medians, parkway and streetscape side-panels, and entryways within the public right of ways or easements adjacent to public right of ways; and within public places including greenbelt areas, open space s, and local parks within each respective Zone. These improvements may include, but are not limited to:
various landscape materials such as trees, turf, shrubs, vines, ground cover, annual or perineal plantings;
irrigation and drainage systems;
structural amenities such as monuments, specialty or ornamental lighting, block walls, retaining walls, or other fencing associated with the landscape areas; hardscapes including mulch, decomposed granite surfaces, stamped concrete, and pavers; recreational amenities within parks or greenbelts that may include benches, play structures, picnic or other recreational facilities, signage, and related appurtenances.
The maintenance of these improvements may include, but is not limited to the regularly scheduled mowing, trimming, pruning, fertilization, pest control, weed and graffiti abatement; installation, removal, replacement and rehabilitation of the landscaping, repair or replacement of irrigation or landscape drainage systems; and repair or replacement of hardscape improvements including sidewalks and recreational amenities. The Recreation and Parks Office shall authorize and schedule such maintenance and servicing as needed and based on available District and/or Zone funding.
Reference is made to the plans and specifications currently on file at the City Engineer's Office relating to the design, recommended materials, and level of maintenance concerning the facilities to be maintained.
- 9 -
The plans show plant species, size, and their location. Specifications for the impro vements comply with the Standard Specifications of the Public Works Department, the 2019 California Building Code, and the Recreation and Parks Department Landscape and Irrigation Standards. For Fiscal Year 2024/2025 the improvements maintained within the District and for which parcels receive special benefits include but is not limited to the following:
NW LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. DS-9 TOTAL SQFT.
Hidden Pines – easement frontage 400-600 Hidden Pines Way 21,011 Oak Valley – Taylor frontage (does not include school); Rancho Verde, Via Establo to Blosser, North Railroad at the 1900 block between Rancho Verde and Taylor
97,275
Blosser Medians – 100 North Blosser Road and 1100 West Main Street 2,392 Villas de la Sara – West Morrison and Oakley Avenue 6,340 Riverside Estates – frontage on Preisker Lane and Hidden Pines Way 8,412 Parkside – frontage on Preisker, parking lot, and playground 9,912 Parkside Basin— grassy basin at Portland Drive and Preisker 20,776 100 West Main Street – median 1,944
Railroad Median-Paved median 600
Cook Street Annex & Fire Station 1 9,945
Bradley Channel Multi-Purpose Trail – from Railroad to Preisker Park-all paved 14,000 Sanchez School – area from black rod iron fence to 3 feet east of the sidewalk on Depot
12,120
Blosser/Donovan Median – on Blosser south -paved median 1,610 Southeast corner of Depot and Morrison 1,500
Downtown medians – Broadway Medians from Fesler Street going south to the front of the Library; East and West Cook Street Medians; South Pine Street from Main Street to Cook Street; East Main Street Medians; 100 North McClelland Median; South Miller Medians from main Street to Cook Street
21,022
TCW – mall perimeter, some interior, and Ruffoni parking lot including Heritage Walk 88,352 Total Northwest Landscape Maintenance District No. DS-9 317,211
Zones of Benefit
In accordance with the 1972 Act, this District utilizes Zones to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of improvements that provide special benefits to specific parcels and developments within the District. Each Zone is associated with specific improvements and/or types of improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone.
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025 the District includes two (2) designated Zones. The boundaries of each Zone are based on the improvements to be maintained and the relationship and proximity of the developments and properties that derive special benefits from those specific improvements. The following is a brief
- 10 -
description and summary of the improvements associated within each Zone and for which parcels receive special benefits:
Cherry Blossom Special Benefit Zone
Improvements associated with the Cherry Blossom Special Benefit Zone include landscaped medians, landscaped open space, the park site, and specialty lighting associated with the frontages on Railroad and Hidden pines totaling and estimated 51,900 square feet of improvements.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be $503.03 per assessor parcel number. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The Cherry Blossom Special Benefit parcels are also assessed the Northwest Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $172.04 per assessment unit as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
North Preisker Ranch Special Benefit Zone
Improvements associated with the North Preisker Ranch Special Benefit Zone include landscaped roundabouts, landscaped medians, landscaped open space, the park site, and specialty lighting associated with the frontages on Atlantic, Blosser (both sides), Canal (both sides), Railroad (up to wall), Boxcar and Caboose, path on Eagleton, both roundabouts and all entry medians totaling and estimated 243,867 square feet of improvements.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materi als and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The North Preisker Ranch Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be $371.19 per assessor parcel number. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The North Preisker Ranch Special Benefit parcels have both commercial and residential components. These parcels are also assessed either the Northwest Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $172.04 per assessment unit or the commercial assessment of $550.50 per APN or tenant space as detailed in the Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Note: A visual depiction of the general location of the landscape improvement areas for the District and Zone boundaries are provided on the District Diagrams provided in Part IV of this Report.
- 11 -
Part II – Method of Apportionment
Legislative Requirements for Assessments
The estimated costs to provide the proposed improvements for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 have been identified and allocated to properties within the District and the Zones therein based on special benefit, consistent with the requirements of the 1972 Act and the assessment provisions of Proposition 218 (being contained in Article XIII D of the California Constitution). The improvements provided by this District and for which properties are assessed are identified as local landscaping improvements in specified parkways, medians, and roundabouts in the public right-of-way including street trees, and landscaping within specified public areas and public facilities including storm water retention basins, parks, easements, and related amenities. The formulas used for calculating assessments and the designation of Zones herein reflect the composition of parcels within the District and the improvements and activities to be provided and have been designed to fairly apportion the cost of providing the improvements based on a determination of the proportional special benefits to each parcel.
Provisions of the 1972 Act
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, including the acquisition, construction, installation and servicing of landscape improvements and related facilities. The 1972 Act requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
Section 22573 defines the net amount to be assessed as follows:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
Section 22574 provides for zones as follows:
“The diagram and assessment may classify various areas within an assessment district into different zones where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements. A zone shall consist of all territory which will receive substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements.”
Provisions of the California Constitution
In addition to the provisions of the 1972 Act, the Article XIII D of the California Constitution outlines specific requirements regarding assessments including the following:
Article XIII D Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service”;
- 12 -
Article XIII D Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.”Article XIII D Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed.
The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
Benefit Analysis
Special Benefits
The ongoing maintenance of landscaped areas within the District as addressed in this Report, provide aesthetic benefits to the properties and a more pleasant environment to walk, drive, live, and/or work.
The primary function of these landscape improvements and related amenities is to serve as an aesthetically pleasing enhancement and green space for the benefit of the immediately surrounding properties and developments for which the improvements were constructed and installed and/or were facilitated by the development or potential development of properties within the District and each respective Zone. In addition, the District pro vided landscaping improvements are an integral part of the physical environment associated with the parcels in the District and/or respective Zones and the proportional direct effect that trees, shrubs, and groundcover have on real property within the district including localized wind reduction; erosion control; storm water capture; noise attenuation; visual screening; ultraviolet light and glare reduction; and odor reduction are a direct and particular benefit to the properties in proximity to those improvements.
While some of the improvements may in part be visible to properties outside the District or Zone, collectively if these various improvements are not properly maintained, it is the parcels within the District and/or respective Zone (as may be applicable), that would be aesthetically burdened or environmentally impacted. Additionally, much of the landscaping within the street right -of-way serve as both a physical buffer as well as a sound reduction buffer between the roadways and the properties in the District and serve as a pleasant aesthetic amenity that enhances the approach to the parcels.
General Benefit
In reviewing the location and extent of the specific landscaped areas and improvements to be funded by District assessments and the proximity and relationship to properties to be assessed it is evident these improvements were primarily installed in connection with the development of properties therein or are improvements that would otherwise be shared by and required for development of properties in the
- 13 -
District or Zone. It is also evident that the maintenance these improvements and the level of maintenance provided has a direct and particular impact (special benefit) only to those properties in proximity to those improvements and such maintenance beyond that which is required to ensure the safety and protection of the general public and property in general, has no direct quantifiable benefit to the public at large or properties outside the District and/or Zones.
In the absence of a special funding District or Zones, the City would typically be obligated to provide only limited (as needed) tree management, weed abatement, rodent control, and erosion control services for the landscape areas currently maintained within the District. This baseline level of service (general benefit level of service) would most likely provide for periodic servicing of the improvement areas on an as-needed basis to ensure public safety and essential property protection to avoid negati ve impacts on adjacent roadways and vehicles traveling on those roadways, and potential property damage resulting from erosion or fire hazards. However, this baseline level of service would clearly result in a far less visually pleasing environment than is created with the enhanced levels of services associated with the regular landscape maintenance provided in the District and funded by the special benefit assessments In addition to the baseline level of service general benefit, it is recognized that there are indirect or incidental general benefits to properties within the District as well as the general public that are associated with regular landscape maintenance services associated with the districtwide improvements, including minimization of dust and debris, and air pollution reduction.
Although these types of benefits might best be characterized as indirect consequences of the special benefit of the landscape maintenance provided to parcels served by the District, for the purposes of this Report we assume these types of benefits to be general benefits, albeit general benefits that are extremely difficult to quantify. Therefore, on behalf of all parcels not assessed by a landscape maintenance district, yet deriving some level of general benefit from the District’s landscaped improvements, the City has historically and will continue to contribute from the general fund a General Benefit Contribution that equals or exceeds the costs attributable to the baseline general benefit costs and indirect/incide ntal general benefit costs for the districtwide shared improvement areas as shown in the Estimate of Costs (Part III of this Report) as the “City General Benefit Contribution”.
- 14 -
Assessment Methodology
To assess benefits equitably it is necessary to calculate each property’s proportional share of the special benefits conferred by the funded improvements and service. The method utilized to determine assessments is called the “method of apportionment” or formula of cost spread ("spread formula"). Assessment Units (“AU”), often referred to as the Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) method of assessment apportionment is utilized for this District and establishes a basic unit (base value) of benefit and then calculates the benefit derived by each assessed parcel as a multiple (or a fraction) of that basic unit. The AU or EBU method of apportioning special benefits is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of comparable property characteristics which may include but is not limited to land use and property size.
The method of apportionment originally developed for this District was based on an assessment spread formula appropriate for the various land uses, identifiable property characteristics and improvements within the District and utilizes an assigned number of comparative dwelling units for residential, non-residential, and undeveloped properties.
The majority of parcels within the District are residential parcels and the improvements are maintained to provide a uniform benefit within the boundaries of the District. Therefore, each dwelling unit, whether an apartment or single family residence is given a base value of one (1) unit.
Parcels in other land use categories were then evaluated and rated by comparison with the bas ic unit.
The assignment of unit values is based primarily on the intensity of land use and its comparison to the base unit. Two unit values have been assigned: a residential efficiency unit, 500 square feet or less, at 50 percent of the residential unit value and a commercial efficiency unit defined at 1200 square feet per commercial charge.
Land Use Classifications
Every parcel within the District is assigned a land use classification based on available parcel information obtained from the County Assessor’s Office. It has been determined that a parcel use and size are the appropriate factors necessary to identify and calculate the proportional spec ial benefits conveyed to each property within the District for the cost of improvements associated with that property. The following are typical site land uses described in Title 12 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code and their proposed Assessment Units. This list includes the majority of parcel uses within the City of Santa Maria and is applied in the calculation of the 2024 /2025 fiscal year assessments.
A summary of the applied Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) for the various land use classifications within the District is shown in the following table:
- 15 -
LAND USE ASSESSMENT UNITS
Residential
Single Family Residential
Two Family Residential
Condominium/Townhouse
Apartment Residential
Mobile Home Parks
Efficiency Unit
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
.5 Unit per dwelling
Commercial
Small, Single Tenant
Efficiency Unit > 1,200 SF
Vacant > 10,000 SF
Commercial Centers
Major Shopping Centers
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per 1,200 SF
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property
Trade/Services
Commercial/Professional Office
Vacant > 25,000 SF
Mid-Size Office
Major Office Buildings
Hospital/Large Medical Offices
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property
7 Units per property
Industrial
Small Industrial
Vacant > 50,000 SF
Medium Industrial
Major Industrial
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property
Exempt
Open Space/Common Areas, Public Facilities, Parks,
Redevelopment Agency
0 Units per property
- 16 -
Part III – Estimate of Costs
The following budgets outline the estimated costs to maintain and service the various landscaping improvements described in this Report for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.
The budgeted expenses outlined in the following pages for the District and the Zones therein reflect the estimated annual expenses required to support and maintain the improvements to be provided for fiscal year 2024/2025. The estimated annual expenses provided in the budgets are considered to be appropriate full-service level costs. These full-service expenses, minus the general benefit expenses (Expenses not assessed and identified as the City’s financial obligation to support the improvements) result in the amount of funding the property owners should reasonably be assessed to fully fund their proportional special benefit from the improvements to be maintained (“Special Benefit Expenses”).
CITY OF SANTA MARIA
NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. DS-9
ESTIMATED BUDGET
2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $74,850 $74,850
Contract, Supplies, Renovation 125,611 155,355
Administration 242,126 242,126
Total Expenditures
$442,587
$472,331
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Assessment $327,296 $353,005
City General Benefit Contribution $115,291 $119,326
Total Revenues $442,587 $472,331
- 17 -
CHERRY BLOSSOM SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities
$26,697
$26,697
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $28,801 $33,205
Administration $8,510 $8,510
Total Expenditures
$64,008
$68,412
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $64,008 $68,412
Total Revenues $64,008 $68,412
NORTH PREISKER RANCH SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $69,132 $69,132
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $126,744 $149,946
Administration $32,219 $32,219
Total Expenditures
$228,095
$251,297
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $228,095 $251,297
Total Revenues $228,095 $251,297
- 18 -
Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) Pursuant to Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218), any “new or increased assessments” require certain noticing and balloting requirements. However, Government Code Section 54954.6(a) provides that a “new or increased assessment” does not include “an assessment which does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments...previously adopted by the agency or approved by the voters in the area where the assessment is imposed.” This definition of a new or increased assessment is reaffirmed in the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, Government Code Section 53753.5.
As previously adopted and approved by the City Council, each fiscal year the maximum assessment rates established for the improvements in the previous fiscal year for the District and each Zone may be adjusted by the percentage increase of the Local Consumer Price Index (CPI). The Consumer Price Index used for the inflationary adjustment shall be for the Los Angeles- Riverside-Orange County Area for All Urban Consumers, as developed by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The CPI used shall be as determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for a similar period of time.
Each fiscal year the City shall identify the annual percentage change in the CPI, using the difference over a 12-month period between the current year and of the previous year as of January of e ach succeeding year. This percentage difference shall then establish the range of increase to the maximum assessment rates allowed. If the percentage change in the CPI is negative, the maximum assessment rates shall not be adjusted from the previous fiscal year (unchanged). Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the City may use the revised index or comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living.
The percentage change in CPI from December 2022 to December 2023 as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics was 3.5 percent. Therefore, the maximum assessment rates for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be increased by 3.5 percent over the maximum assessment rates for fiscal year 2023/2024.
- 19 -
Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams
The following section contains a series of diagrams showing the boundaries of Santa Maria Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-9 and the Zones therein for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. In addition to depicting the boundaries of the Zones, the diagrams also provide a visual depiction of the general location of the improvement areas being funded and maintained within the Distr ict and Zones. All parcels that will receive a special benefit from the improvements provided within the District and each respective Zone consist of the lots, parcels and subdivisions of land within the boundaries of the District and/or Zones as depicted by these diagrams and the lines and dimensions of those lots, parcels and subdivisions of land shall be those lines and dimensions shown on the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s parcel maps for the current fiscal year and by reference the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s parcel maps are incorporated herein and made part of this Report. These diagrams along with the Assessment Roll incorporated in Part V of this Report constitute the District Assessment Diagram for Fiscal Year 202 4/2025.
- 20 -
District Boundary Diagram
- 21 -
District Improvement Diagram (Northern Section)
- 22 -
District Improvement Diagram (Southern Section)
- 23 -
Cherry Blossom Special Benefit Zone
- 24 -
North Preisker Ranch Special Benefit Zone
- 25 -
Part V - Assessment Rolls
Due to the number of parcels in the District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2024 /2025 (a listing of the parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts) has been filed with the City Clerk in an electronic format and is, by reference, made part of this Report. The proposed Assessment Roll shall be available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during normal office hours.
The Assessment Roll identified the parcels within the District that are assessed for special benefits and their corresponding assessment amount(s) for fiscal year 2024/2025. Each parcel listed on the Assessment Roll is currently shown and illustrated on the County Assessor's Roll and the County Assessor’s Parcel Number Maps (APN maps). These records are, by reference, made part of this Report and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. All assessments presented on the assessment roll are subject to change as a result of parcel changes made by the County including parcel splits, parcel merges or development changes that occur prior to the County Assessor's Offic e securing the final roll and generating tax bills for fiscal year 2024 /2025.
EXHIBIT B
Annual Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025
Northeast Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-10
Incorporating Special Benefit Zones:
Rivergate Roemer
Suey and Donovan
Donovan Estates
La Ventana
Intent to Levy Meeting: May 21, 2024
Public Hearing: June 4, 2024
City of Santa Maria
110 E. Cook Street
Santa Maria, CA 93454
Prepared by: Scott Christian, Operations Manager
- 2 -
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
This report and the enclosed descriptions, budgets, and diagrams outline the proposed improvements and assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-10 in the City of Santa Maria for Fiscal Year 2024/2025, which includes each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within said District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
- 3 -
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. - 4 - Report Content and Annual Proceedings ................................................................... - 4 - PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ........................................................................... - 8 - Zones of Benefit ....................................................................................................... - 10 - Part II – Method of Apportionment ............................................................................ - 13 - Benefit Analysis ........................................................................................................ - 14 - Assessment Methodology ........................................................................................ - 16 - Part III – Estimate of Costs .......................................................................................... - 18 - Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) ............................... - 21 - Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams................................................................................. - 22 - District Boundary Diagram ....................................................................................... - 23 - District Improvement Diagram (Northern Section) ................................................. - 24 - District Improvement Diagram (Southern Section) ................................................. - 25 - Suey and Donovan Special Benefit Zone .................................................................. - 26 - Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit Zone ................................................................... - 27 - Donovan Estates Special Benefit Zone ..................................................................... - 28 - La Ventana Special Benefit Zone .............................................................................. - 29 - Part V - Assessment Rolls ............................................................................................ - 30 -
- 4 -
INTRODUCTION
The City of Santa Maria (“City”), under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”) and in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID (“California Constitution”) annually levies and collects special assessments for the City’s maintenance assessment district designated as Northeast Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-10 (hereafter referred to as “District”) to fund in whole or in part the maintenance and operation of landscaping improvements that provide special benefits to properties within the District.
The City Council on May 2, 1989, established the formation of the Northeast Landscape Maintenance District No. DS-10 for the purpose of financing the continued maintenance of the landscaping within the northeast quadrant of the City.
In accordance with the 1972 Act, the Dist rict also utilizes special benefit zones (“Zones”) to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements that provide special benefits to specific parcels and developments within the District. Within the boundaries of the District, some parcels may be assigned to a special benefit zone, each of which is associated with specific improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone that are in addition to the improvements proportionally shared by properties throughout the District.
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025 in addition to the shared District improvements and assessments, parcels within the following Zones may be assessed for local improvements specific to the parcels and developments within each respective Zone:
Suey and Donovan Special Benefit Zone
Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit Zone
Donovan Estates Special Benefit Zone
La Ventana Special Benefit Zone
Report Content and Annual Proceedings
This Engineer’s Annual Report (the “Report”) has been prepared pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 4 and Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act, and presented to the City Council for their consideration and approval of the proposed improvements and services to be provided within the District and the levy and collection of annual assessments related thereto for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. This Report outlines the District improvements, the special benefit zones, the method of apportionment, and proposed assessments to be levied in connection with the special benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a source of funding to fund in whole or in part, the continued operation and maintenance of the landscaping improvements and services to be provided by the District for the properties within the District and specified Zones for which the properties receive special benefits.
- 5 -
Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the authorized District improvements and based upon available revenues including assessment revenues, fund balances, general benefit contributions and any additional City contributions from available sources. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include, but are not limited to the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District; deficits or surpluses from prior years; revenues from other sources; and the collection of funds for operational reserves and/or periodic repairs, replacements and rehabilitation projects as authorized by the 1972 Act. The net annual cost to provide the improvements within the District plus each benefit Zone (if applicable) are allocated to the benefiting properties within the District and respective Zones as applicable, using a weighted method of apportionment (refer to Assessment Methodology in Section II, Method of Apportionment) that calculates the proportional special benefit and assessment for each parcel as compared to other properties that benefit from the District improvements and services. Thus, each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.
The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s Office. The Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the District assessments.
At a noticed annual Public Hearing, the City Council will accept all public comments and written protests regarding the District and the annual levy of assessments. Based on those public comments and written protests, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted.
Following final approval of the Report and confirmation of the assessments, the City Council will by Resolution, order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of ass essments for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.
As required by the 1972 Act, this Engineer’s Report describes the improvements to be provided, maintained, and serviced by the District, an estimated budget for the District improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District for fiscal year 2024/2025.
Part I – Plans and Specifications: This section contains a general description of the District, special benefit zones (“Zones”), and the improvements and services that provide special benefits to the parcels within the District. The improvements, appurtenant facilities, and services that provide special benefits to the properties within the District and for which parcels are assessed may include, but not limited to the installation and maintenance of landscaping improvements within the public right-of-way of streets within the District, retention basins, parks, public facilities and related amenities as well as associated operational and incidental expenses, and the collection of fund balances authorized by the 1972 Act. The plans and specifications contained in this Report generally describe the nature and extent of the improvements. In
- 6 -
conjunction with these general descriptions, a visual depiction of the improvements may be provided in the District Diagrams contained in Part IV of this Report. More detailed information regarding the specific plans and specifications associated with the District improvements and Zone improvements are on file in the City Engineer’s Office and by reference are made part of this Report.
Part II – Method of Apportionment: This section includes a discussion of the special and general benefits associated with the improvements to be provided within the District (Benefit Analysis). This section of the Report also outlines the basis upon which the estimated costs to provide such improvements has been apportioned to each parcel of land therein in proportion to the special benefits to be received. (the method of calculating each property’s proportional special benefit assessment). This method of apportionment is consistent with the previously approved and adopted method of apportionment for the District.
Part III – Estimate of Costs: Identifies the estimated annual funding costs (Budgets) required for the maintenance and operation of the improvements in the District and Zones authorized by the 1972 Act and deemed appropriate to support the improvements, including, but not limited to, annual maintenance and service expenses, utility costs, and related incidental expenses. For fiscal year 202 4/2025 annual contract maintenance costs have increased by three percent (3.5%). Those improvements and/or costs determined to be of general benefit shall be funded by a City contribution. In addition to the general benefit costs, the City may provide additional funding to support the m aintenance and operation of the improvements considered to be of special benefit, but City staff shall make the determination of which improvements, and the extent of the services and activities that shall be provided based on available revenues.
This section also identifies and outlines an Assessment Range Formula (inlaationary adjust) previously approved and adopted for the District assessments that provides for an annual adjustment to the maximum assessment rates, which establishes limits on future assessments, but also provides for reasonable cost adjustments due to inlaation.
Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams: This section of the Report contains a series of diagrams showing the boundaries of the District and Zones for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 which incorporate the parcels determined to receive special benefits from the District improvements. These diagrams may also provide a visual depiction of the location of the improvements being maintained. The lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land contained in the District and Zone diagrams are inclusive of the parcels listed in “Part V - Assessment Roll” of this Report and the corresponding County Assessor’s Parcel Maps for said parcels as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and shall incorporate all subsequent subdivisions, lot-line adjustments, or parcel changes therein. Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land within the District and Zones.
- 7 -
Part V – Assessment Roll: The assessment amounts to be levied and collected in fiscal year 2024/2025 for each parcel is based on the parcel’s calculated proportional special benefit as outlined in "Part II - Method of Apportionment" and the annual assessment rates established by the estimated budgets in "Part III - Estimate of Costs" of this Report. Due to the number of parcels within the District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2024/2025 has been filed electronically with the City Clerk rather than displayed in this Report and by reference the listing of the Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and the corresponding assessment amounts are made part of this Report.
Note: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone of this Engineer’s Report is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Engineer’s Report and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, portions, zones, or subzones might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
- 8 -
PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The purpose of this District is to provide in part through annual assessments, funding for the installation, operation, and maintenance of landscaping improvements in specified parkways, medians, and roundabouts in the public right-of-way including street trees, and landscaping within specified public areas and public facilities including storm water retention basins that control subdivision water runoff, parks, and easements.
As authorized by the 1972 Act, the improvements provided by the District and associated with each Zone therein may incorporate various local landscaping improvements and related amenities that were either installed in direct connection with the development of properties within the District and each respective Zone or were installed for the benefit of those properties resulting from property development or potential development of those properties and are considered necessary elements for the development of su ch properties to their full and best use and these improvements are maintained and serviced for the special benefit of real property within the District and/or Zones. The work to be performed within the District and each respective Zone may include but is not limited to (as applicable), the personnel, materials, equipment, electricity, water, contract services, repair and rehabilitation of the improvements and incidental expenses required to operate the District and provide the improvements and services.
Improvements provided within the District and/or Zone may include but are not limited to landscaping and related facilities and amenities located within designated street medians, parkway and streetscape side-panels, and entryways within the public right of ways or easements adjacent to public right of ways; and within public places including greenbelt areas, open spaces, and local parks within each respective Zone. These improvements may include, but are not limited to:
various landscape materials such as trees, turf, shrubs, vines, ground cover, annual or perineal plantings;
irrigation and drainage systems;
structural amenities such as monuments, specialty or ornamental lighting, block walls, retaining walls, or other fencing associated with the landscape areas; hardscapes including mulch, decomposed granite surfaces, stamped concrete, and pavers; recreational amenities within parks or greenbelts that may include benches, play structures, picnic or other recreational facilities, signage, and related appurtenances.
The maintenance of these improvements may include, but is not limited to the regularly scheduled mowing, trimming, pruning, fertilization, pest control, weed and graffiti abatement; installation, removal, replacement and rehabilitation of the landscaping, repair or replacement of irrigation or landscape drainage systems; and repair or replacement of hardscape improvements including sidewalks and recreational amenities. The Recreation and Parks Office shall authorize and schedule such maintenance and servicing as needed and based on available District and/or Zone funding.
Reference is made to the plans and specifications currently on file at the City Engineer's Office relating to the design, recommended materials, and level of maintenance concerning the facilities to be maintained.
- 9 -
The plans show plant species, size, and their location. Specifications for the improvements comply with the Standard Specifications of the Public Works Department, the 2019 California Building Code, and the Recreation and Parks Department Landscape and Irrigation Standards. For Fiscal Year 2024/2025 the improvements maintained within the District and for which parcels receive special benefits include but is not limited to the following:
NE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. DS-10 TOTAL SQFT.
Emerald Park – Shrubs on College near Donovan 8,893
Emerald Basin – Grassy basin on College near Donovan 11,547 Donovan Medians 9,504
Riverside Terrace – 1800 block of Bayview Drive, open space on Seaward and around Basin on Kathryn 134,777
Riverside Basin – Grassy basin on Kathryn 24,686
Shields/Cochiolo – 1600 block Suey Road - frontage on Suey and Donovan, frontage on Antone and Floyd Court 61,476
Suey Basin – Grassy basin on Suey near Antone 14,774
Sierra Vista – frontage on Panther and Centennial, basin at the corner of Panther and Centennial and the breezeway off Mammoth 40,000
Rowland Estates – Shrubs and playground. 12,332
Rowland Basin – includes weedy basin 4,656
Canyon Homes – 1400 East Donovan Road entrance 3,764
Olive Garden – 1200 South Bradley median 2,900
Hancock College – 800 South Bradley median 3,064
Bradley Easement – south of Main Street to Jones Street 14,718 Transit Center 70,993
Hancock Terrace Bike Path-Miller to College 30,000
800 E Jones median-Paved island 462
Pepper Tree Medians – north of Donovan Road on Broadway 3,456 Stowell Road Easement – east of Miller Street 13,492
Alvin Overpass 59,513
North Bradley Ivy – Fesler Junior High easement area 15,493 Donovan/Miller Median 10,310
Via Rubio – Jewel Street only 4,836
Donovan Overpass 67,751
Pepperwood Median 1,819
East Main Street & 101-weedy shoulders 7,301
Bradley at Elks 22,310
Downtown medians – Broadway Medians from Fesler Street going south to the front of the Library; East and West Cook Street Medians; South Pine Street from Main Street to Cook Street; East Main Street Medians; 100 North McClelland Median; South Miller Medians from Main Street to Cook Street
21,022
- 10 -
TCE - mall perimeter includes bus turnout, theater, Macy's parking lot and pocket park at Main & Broadway 186,393
Fire Station # 5 32,997
Total Northeast Landscape Maintenance District No. DS-10 895,239
Zones of Benefit
In accordance with the 1972 Act, this District utilizes Zones to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of improvements that provide special benefits to specific parcels and developments within the District. Each Zone is associated with specific improvements and/or types of improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone.
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025 the District includes four (4) designated Zones. The boundaries of each Zone are based on the improvements to be maintained and the relationship and proximity of the developments and properties that derive special benefits from those specific improvements. The following is a brief description and summary of the improvements associated within each Zone and for which parcels receive special benefits:
Suey and Donovan Special Benefit Zone
Improvements associated with the Suey and Donovan Special Benefit Zone include the landscaped medians on Donavan between Suey and Suey Crossing totaling an estimated 33,725 square feet of which 40 percent is hardscape (13,490 square feet) and 60 percent is irrigated turf, trees, and shrubs (20,235 square feet).
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The Suey and Donovan Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 202 4/2025 will be $286.40 per dwelling unit. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The Suey and Donovan Special Benefit parcels are also assessed the Northeast Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $296.42 per assessment unit or the commercial assessment of $733.30 per APN or tenant space as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit Zone
The developments in the Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit Zone include College Estates I and II, Princess Estates I, II and III, and River Oaks North. Improvements for the Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit Zone include the landscaped medians, landscaped open space, the park site/basin, and specialty lighting associated with the medians and frontage easements of River Oaks North, College Estates, and Princess
- 11 -
Estates including Seaward, Paden, Carlotti, Borges, the Bradley Channel, and the walled area behind the homes on Mariah totaling an estimated 163,936 square feet of improvement area.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit Zone Assessment will be $259.87 per parcel for fiscal year 2024/2025. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit parcels are also assessed the Northeast Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $296.42 per assessment unit or the commercial assessment of $733.30 per APN or tenant space as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Donovan Estates Special Benefit Zone
The improvements that are associated with the Donovan Estates Special Benefit Zone include the public easement areas along Donovan Road frontage (25,586 square feet), the park site and retardation basin (11,652 square feet) collectively totaling an estimated 37,238 square feet of improvements that includes the maintenance of the tot lot, street trees, and anti-graffiti measures as necessary.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The Donovan Estates Special Benefit Zone Assessment will be $326.47 per parcel for fiscal year 2024/2025. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The Donovan Estates Special Benefit Zone parcels are also assessed the Northeast Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $296.42 per assessment unit as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
La Ventana Special Benefit Zone
The developments in this zone include La Ventana and Legacy. The improvements that are associated with La Ventana Special Benefit Zone include the public easement frontage areas along Main Street and Panther Drive to Willingham, Dressler, interior street enhancements and shrub portion of basin (106,042 square feet) and the weedy portion of the retention basin (45,112 square feet) collectively totaling an estimated 151,154 square feet of improvements that includes the maintenance of specialty lighting, street trees, and anti-graffiti measures as necessary.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The La Ventana Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be $445.71 per assessor parcel number. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
- 12 -
The La Ventana Special Benefit Zone parcels are also assessed the Northeast Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $296.42 per assessment unit or tenant space as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Note: A visual depiction of the general location of the landscape improvement areas for the District and Zone boundaries are provided on the District Diagrams provided in Part IV of this Report.
- 13 -
Part II – Method of Apportionment
Legislative Requirements for Assessments
The estimated costs to provide the proposed improvements for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 have been identified and allocated to properties within the District and the Zones therein based on special benefit, consistent with the requirements of the 1972 Act and the assessment provisions of Proposition 218 (being contained in Article XIII D of the California Constitution). The improvements provided by this District and for which properties are assessed are identified as local landscaping improvements in specified parkways, medians, and roundabouts in the public right-of-way including street trees, and landscaping within specified public areas and public facilities including storm water retention basins, parks, easements, and related amenities. The formulas used for calculating assessments and the designation of Zones herein reflect the composition of parcels within the District and the improvements and activities to be provided and have been designed to fairly apportion the cost of providing the improvements based on a determination of the proportional special benefits to each parcel.
Provisions of the 1972 Act
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, including the acquisition, construction, installation and servicing of landscape improvements and related facilities. The 1972 Act requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
Section 22573 defines the net amount to be assessed as follows:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
Section 22574 provides for zones as follows:
“The diagram and assessment may classify various areas within an assessment district into different zones where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements. A zone shall consist of all territory which will receive substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements.”
Provisions of the California Constitution
In addition to the provisions of the 1972 Act, the Article XIII D of the California Constitution outlines specific requirements regarding assessments including the following:
Article XIII D Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service”;
- 14 -
Article XIII D Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.”Article XIII D Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed.
The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
Benefit Analysis
Special Benefits
The ongoing maintenance of landscaped areas within the District as addressed in this Report, provide aesthetic benefits to the properties and a more pleasant environment to walk, drive, live, and/or work.
The primary function of these landscape improvements and related amenities is to serve as an aesthetically pleasing enhancement and green space for the benefit of the immediately surrounding properties and developments for which the improvements were constructed and installed and/or were facilitated by the development or potential development of properties within the District and each respective Zone. In addition, the District pro vided landscaping improvements are an integral part of the physical environment associated with the parcels in the District and/or respective Zones and the proportional direct effect that trees, shrubs, and groundcover have on real property within the district including localized wind reduction; erosion control; storm water capture; noise attenuation; visual screening; ultraviolet light and glare reduction; and odor reduction are a direct and particular benefit to the properties in proximity to those improvements.
While some of the improvements may in part be visible to properties outside the District or Zone, collectively if these various improvements are not properly maintained, it is the parcels within the District and/or respective Zone (as may be applicable), that would be aesthetically burdened or environmentally impacted. Additionally, much of the landscaping within the street right -of-way serve as both a physical buffer as well as a sound reduction buffer between the roadways and the properties in the District and serve as a pleasant aesthetic amenity that enhances the approach to the parcels.
General Benefit
In reviewing the location and extent of the specific landscaped areas and improvements to be funded by District assessments and the proximity and relationship to properties to be assessed it is evident these improvements were primarily installed in connection with the development of properties therein or are improvements that would otherwise be shared by and required for development of properties in the
- 15 -
District or Zone. It is also evident that the maintenance these improvements and the level of maintenance provided has a direct and particular impact (special benefit) only to those properties in proximity to those improvements and such maintenance beyond that which is required to ensure the safety and protection of the general public and property in general, has no direct quantifiable benefit to the public at large or properties outside the District and/or Zones.
In the absence of a special funding District or Zones, the City would typically be obligated to provide only limited (as needed) tree management, weed abatement, rodent control, and erosion control services for the landscape areas currently maintained within the District. This baseline level of service (general benefit level of service) would most likely provide for periodic servicing of the improvement areas on an as-needed basis to ensure public safety and essential property protection to avoid negative impacts on adjacent roadways and vehicles traveling on those roadways, and potential property damage resulting from erosion or fire hazards. However, this baseline level of service would clearly result in a far less visually pleasing environment than is created with the enhanced levels of services associated with the regular landscape maintenance provided in the District and funded by the special benefit assessments In addition to the baseline level of service general benefit, it is recognized that there are indirect or incidental general benefits to properties within the District as well as the general public that are associated with regular landscape maintenance services associated with the districtwide improvements, including minimization of dust and debris, and air pollution reduction.
Although these types of benefits might best be characterized as indirect consequences of the special benefit of the landscape maintenance provided to parcels served by the District, for the purposes of this Report we assume these types of benefits to be general benefits, albeit general benefits that are extremely difficult to quantify. Therefore, on behalf of all parcels not assessed by a landscape maintenance district, yet deriving some level of general benefit from the District’s landscaped improvements, the City has historically and will continue to contribute from the general fund a General Benefit Contribution that equals or exceeds the costs attributable to the baseline general benefit costs and indirect/incidental general benefit costs for the districtwide shared improvement areas as shown in the Estimate of Costs (Part III of this Report) as the “City General Benefit Contribution”.
- 16 -
Assessment Methodology
To assess benefits equitably it is necessary to calculate each property’s proportional share of the special benefits conferred by the funded improvements and service. The method utilized to determine assessments is called the “method of apportionment” or formula of cost spread ("spread formula"). Assessment Units (“AU”), often referred to as the Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) method of assessment apportionment is utilized for this District and establishes a basic unit (base value) of benefit and then calculates the benefit derived by each assessed parcel as a multiple (or a fraction) of that basic unit. The AU or EBU method of apportioning special benefits is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of comparable property characteristics which may include but is not limited to land use and property size.
The method of apportionment originally developed for this District was based on an assessment spread formula appropriate for the various land uses, identifiable property characteristics and improvements within the District and utilizes an assigned number of comparative dwelling units for residential, non-residential, and undeveloped properties.
The majority of parcels within the District are residential parcels and the improvements are maintained to provide a uniform benefit within the boundaries of the District. Therefore, each dwelling unit, whether an apartment or single family residence is given a base value of one (1) unit.
Parcels in other land use categories were then evaluated and rated by comparison with the basic unit.
The assignment of unit values is based primarily on the intensity of land use and its comparison to the base unit. Two unit values have been assigned: a residential efficiency unit, 500 square feet or less, at 50 percent of the residential unit value and a commercial efficiency unit defined at 1200 square feet per commercial charge.
Land Use Classifications
Every parcel within the District is assigned a land use classification based on available parcel information obtained from the County Assessor’s Office. It has been determined that a parcel use and size are the appropriate factors necessary to identify and calculate the proportional special benefits conveyed to each property within the District for the cost of improvements associated with that property. The following are typical site land uses described in Ti tle 12 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code and their proposed Assessment Units. This list includes the majority of parcel uses within the City of Santa Maria and is applied in the calculation of the 202 4/2025 fiscal year assessments.
A summary of the applied Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) for the various land use classifications within the District is shown in the following table:
- 17 -
LAND USE ASSESSMENT UNITS
Residential
Single Family Residential
Two Family Residential
Condominium/Townhouse
Apartment Residential
Mobile Home Parks
Efficiency Unit
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
.5 Unit per dwelling
Commercial
Small, Single Tenant
Efficiency Unit > 1,200 SF
Vacant > 10,000 SF
Commercial Centers
Major Shopping Centers
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per 1,200 SF
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property
Trade/Services
Commercial/Professional Office
Vacant > 25,000 SF
Mid-Size Office
Major Office Buildings
Hospital/Large Medical Offices
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property
7 Units per property
Industrial
Small Industrial
Vacant > 50,000 SF
Medium Industrial
Major Industrial
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property
Exempt
Open Space/Common Areas, Public Facilities, Parks,
Redevelopment Agency
0 Units per property
- 18 -
Part III – Estimate of Costs
The following budgets outline the estimated costs to maintain and service the various landscaping improvements described in this Report for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.
The budgeted expenses outlined in the following pages for the District and the Zones therein reflect the estimated annual expenses required to support and maintain the improvements to be provided for fiscal year 2024/2025. The estimated annual expenses provided in the budgets are considered to be appropriate full-service level costs. These full-service expenses, minus the general benefit expenses (Expenses not assessed and identified as the City’s financial obligation to support the improvements) result in the amount of funding the property owners should reasonably be assessed to fully fund their proportional special benefit from t he improvements to be maintained (“Special Benefit Expenses”).
CITY OF SANTA MARIA
NORTHEAST LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. DS-10
ESTIMATED BUDGET
2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $113,817 $113,817
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $315,216 $340,440
Administration $291,623 $291,622
Total Expenditures $720,656 $745,879
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Assessment $522,659 $540,952
City General Benefit Contribution $197,997 $204,927
Total Revenues $720,656 $745,879
- 19 -
SUEY AND DONOVAN SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $0 $0
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $6,215 $6,529
Administration $2,764 $2,764
Total Expenditures $8,979 $9,293
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $8,979 $9,293
Total Revenues $8,979 $9,293
RIVERGATE ROEMER SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $29,844 $29,844
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $64,529 $68,150
Administration $16,608 $16,608
Total Expenditures $110,981 $114,602
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $110,981 $114,602
Total Revenues $110,981 $114,602
DONOVAN ESTATES SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $263 $263
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $14,045 $15,294
Administration $2,725 $2,725
Total Expenditures $17,033 $18,282
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $17,033 $18,282
Total Revenues $17,033 $18,282
- 20 -
LA VENTANA SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $11,277 $11,277
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $76,666 $81,686
Administration $15,906 $15,906
Total Expenditures 103,849 $108,869
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $103,849 $108,869
Total Revenues $103,849 $108,869
- 21 -
Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) Pursuant to Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218), any “new or increased assessments” require certain noticing and balloting requirements. However, Government Code Section 54954.6(a) provides that a “new or increased assessment” does not include “an assessment which does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments...previously adopted by the agency or approved by the voters in the area where the assessment is imposed.” This definition of a new or increased assessment is reaffirmed in the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, Government Code Section 53753.5.
As previously adopted and approved by the City Council, each fiscal year the maximum assessment rates established for the improvements in the previous fiscal year for the District and each Zone may be adjusted by the percentage increase of the Local Consumer Price Index (CPI). The Consumer Price Index used for the inflationary adjustment shall be for the Los Angeles- Riverside-Orange County Area for All Urban Consumers, as developed by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The CPI used shall be as determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for a similar period of time.
Each fiscal year the City shall identify the annual percentage change in the CPI, using the difference over a 12-month period between the current year and of the previous year as of January of each succeeding year. This percentage difference shall then establish the range of increase to the maximum assessment rates allowed. If the percentage change in the CPI is negative, the maximum assessment rates shall not be adjusted from the previous fiscal year (unchanged). Should the Bureau of Labor Statist ics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the City may use the revised index or comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living.
The percentage change in CPI from December 2022 to December 2023 as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics was 3.5 percent. Therefore, the maximum assessment rates for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be increased by 3.5 percent over the maximum assessment rates for fiscal year 2023/2024.
- 22 -
Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams
The following section contains a series of diagrams showing the boundaries of Santa Maria Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-10 and the Zones therein for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. In addition to depicting the boundaries of the Zones, the diagrams also provide a visual depiction of the general location of the improvement areas being funded and maintained within the District and Zones. All parcels that will receive a special benefit from the improvements pro vided within the District and each respective Zone consist of the lots, parcels and subdivisions of land within the boundaries of the District and/or Zones as d epicted by these diagrams and the lines and dimensions of those lots, parcels and subdivisions o f land shall be those lines and dimensions shown on the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s parcel maps for the current fiscal year and by reference the Santa Barbara Count y Assessor’s parcel maps are incorporated herein and made part of this Report. These dia grams along with the Assessment Roll incorporated in Part V of this Report constitute the District Assessment Diagram for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.
- 23 -
District Boundary Diagram
- 24 -
District Improvement Diagram (Northern Section)
- 25 -
District Improvement Diagram (Southern Section)
- 26 -
Suey and Donovan Special Benefit Zone
- 27 -
Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit Zone
- 28 -
Donovan Estates Special Benefit Zone
- 29 -
La Ventana Special Benefit Zone
- 30 -
Part V - Assessment Rolls
Due to the number of parcels in the District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 202 4/2025 (a listing of the parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts) has been filed with the City Clerk in an electronic format and is, by reference, made part of this Report. The proposed Assessment Roll shall be available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during normal office hours.
The Assessment Roll identified the parcels within the District that are assessed for special benefits and their corresponding assessment amount(s) for fiscal year 2024/2025. Each parcel listed on the Assessment Roll is currently shown and illustrated on the County Assessor's Roll and the County Assessor’s Parcel Number Maps (APN maps). These records are, by reference, made part of this Report and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. All assessments presented on the assessment roll are subject to change as a result of parcel changes made by the County including parcel splits, parcel merges or development changes that occur prior to the County A ssessor's Office securing the final roll and generating tax bills for fiscal year 2024/2025.
EXHIBIT C
Annual Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025
Southeast South Miller and South College Drive Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-6
Incorporating Special Benefit Zones:
Crossroads Commercial
Crossroads Residential
Bradley Square
Enos Ranch Commercial
Enos Ranch Residential
Intent to Levy Meeting: May 21, 2024
Public Hearing: June 4, 2024
City of Santa Maria
110 E. Cook Street
Santa Maria, CA 93454
Prepared by: Scott Christian, Operations Manager
- 2 -
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
This report and the enclosed descriptions, budgets, and diagrams outline the proposed improvements and assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-6 in the City of Santa Maria for Fiscal Year 2024/2025, which includes each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within said District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
- 3 -
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. - 4 - Report Content and Annual Proceedings ................................................................... - 4 - PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ........................................................................... - 8 - Zones of Benefit ....................................................................................................... - 10 - Part II – Method of Apportionment ............................................................................ - 13 - Benefit Analysis ........................................................................................................ - 14 - Assessment Methodology ........................................................................................ - 16 - Part III – Estimate of Costs .......................................................................................... - 18 - Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) ............................... - 21 - Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams................................................................................. - 22 - District Boundary Diagram ....................................................................................... - 23 - District Improvement Diagram (Northern Section) ................................................. - 24 - District Improvement Diagram (Southern Section) ................................................. - 25 - Crossroads Commercial Special Benefit Zone .......................................................... - 26 - Crossroads Residential Special Benefit Zone ........................................................... - 27 - Bradley Square Special Benefit Zone ....................................................................... - 28 - Enos Ranch Commercial and Residential Special Benefit Zone ............................... - 29 - Part V - Assessment Rolls ............................................................................................ - 30 -
- 4 -
INTRODUCTION
The City of Santa Maria (“City”), under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”) and in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID (“California Constitution”) annually levies and collects special assessments for the City’s maintenance assessment district designated as Southeast South Miller Street and College Drive Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-6 (hereafter referred to as “District”) to fund in whole or in part the maintenance and operation of landscaping improvements that provide special benefits to properties within the District.
The City Council on August 4, 1981, established the formation of the Southeast South Miller Street and South College Drive Landscape Maintenance District No. DS-6 for the purpose of financing the continued maintenance of the landscaping within the southeast quadrant of the City.
In accordance with the 1972 Act, the District also utilizes special benefit zones (“Zones”) to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements that provide special benefits to specific parcels and developments within the District. Within the boundaries of the District, some parcels may be assigned to a special benefit zone, each of which is associated with specific improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone that are in addition to the improvements proportionally shared by properties throughout the District.
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025 in addition to the shared District improvements and assessments, parcels within the following Zones may be assessed for local improvements specific to the parcels and developments within each respective Zone:
Crossroads Commercial Special Benefit Zone,
Crossroads Residential Special Benefit Zone,
Bradley Square Special Benefit Zone,
Enos Ranch Commercial Special Benefit Zone,
Enos Ranch Residential Special Benefit Zone,
Report Content and Annual Proceedings
This Engineer’s Annual Report (the “Report”) has been prepared pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 4 and Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act, and presented to the City Council for their consideration and approval of the proposed improvements and services to be provided within the District and the levy and collection of annual assessments related thereto for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. This Report outlines the District improvements, the special benefit zones, the method of apportionment, and proposed assessments to be levied in connection with the special benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a source of funding to fund in whole or in part, the continued
- 5 -
operation and maintenance of the landscaping improvements and services to be provided by the District for the properties within the District and specified Zones for which the properties receive special benefits.
Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the authorized District improvements and based upon available revenues including assessment revenues, fund balances, general benefit contributions and any additional City contributions from available sources. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include, but are not limited to the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District; deficits or surpluses from prior years; revenues from other sources; and the collection of funds for operational reserves and/or periodic repairs, replacements and rehabilitation projects as authorized by the 1972 Act. The net annual cost to provide the improvements within the District plus each benefit Zone (if applicable) are allocated to the benefiting properties within the District and respective Zones as applicable, using a weighted method of apportionment (refer to Assessment Methodology in Section II, Method of Apportionment) that calculates the proportional special benefit and assessment for each parcel as compared to other properties that benefit from the District improvements and services. Thus, each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.
The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s Office. The Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the District assessments.
At a noticed annual Public Hearing, the City Council will accept all public comments and written protests regarding the District and the annual levy of assessments. Based on those public comments and written protests, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted.
Following final approval of the Report and confirmation of the assessments, the City Council will by Resolution, order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.
As required by the 1972 Act, this Engineer’s Report describes the improvements to be provided, maintained, and serviced by the District, an estimated budget for the District improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District for fiscal year 2024/2025.
Part I – Plans and Specifications: This section contains a general description of the District, special benefit zones (“Zones”), and the improvements and services that provide special benefits to the parcels within the District. The improvements, appurtenant facilities, and ser vices that provide special benefits to the properties within the District and for which parcels are assessed may include, but not limited to the installation and maintenance of landscaping improvements within the public right-of-way of streets within
- 6 -
the District, retention basins, parks, public facilities and related amenities as well as associated operational and incidental expenses, and the collection of fund balances authorized by the 1972 Act. The plans and specifications contained in this Report generally describe the nature and extent of the improvements. In conjunction with these general descriptions, a visual depiction of the improvements may be provided in the District Diagrams contained in Part IV of this Report. More detailed information regardin g the specific plans and specifications associated with the District improvements and Zone improvements are on file in the City Engineer’s Office and by reference are made part of this Report.
Part II – Method of Apportionment: This section includes a discussion of the special and general benefits associated with the improvements to be provided within the District (Benefit Analysis). This section of the Report also outlines the basis upon which the estimated costs to provide such improvements has been apportioned to each parcel of land therein in proportion to the special benefits to be received. (the method of calculating each property’s proportional special benefit assessment). This method of apportionment is consistent with the previously approved and ad opted method of apportionment for the District.
Part III – Estimate of Costs: Identifies the estimated annual funding costs (Budgets) required for the maintenance and operation of the improvements in the District and Zones authorized by the 1972 Act and deemed appropriate to support the improvements, including, but not limited to, annual maintenance and service expenses, utility costs, and related incidental expenses. For fiscal year 202 4/2025 annual contract maintenance costs have increased by three percent (3.5%). Those improvements and/or costs determined to be of general benefit shall be funded by a City contribution. In addition to the general benefit costs, the City may provide additional funding to support the maintenance and operation of the improve ments considered to be of special benefit, but City staff shall make the determination of which improvements, and the extent of the services and activities that shall be provided based on available revenues.
This section also identifies and outlines an Assessment Range Formula (inflationary adjust) previously approved and adopted for the District assessments that provides for an annual adjustment to the maximum assessment rates, which establishes limits on future assessments, but also provides for reasonable cost adjustments due to inflation.
Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams: This section of the Report contains a series of diagrams showing the boundaries of the District and Zones for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 which incorporate the parcels determined to receive special benefits from the District improvements. These diagrams may also provide a visual depiction of the location of the improvements being maintained. The lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land contained in the District and Zone diagrams are inclusive of the parcels listed in “Part V - Assessment Roll” of this Report and the corresponding County Assessor’s Parcel Maps for said parcels as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and shall incorporate all subsequent subdivisions, lot-line adjustments, or parcel changes therein. Reference is hereby made to the Santa
- 7 -
Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land within the District and Zones.
Part V – Assessment Roll: The assessment amounts to be levied and collected in fiscal year 2024/2025 for each parcel is based on the parcel’s calculated proportional special benefit as outlined in "Part II - Method of Apportionment" and the annual assessment rates established by the estimated budgets in "Part III - Estimate of Costs" of this Report. Due to the number of parcels within the District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2024/2025 has been filed electronically with the City Clerk rather than displayed in this Report and by reference the listing of the Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and the corresponding assessment amounts are made part of this Report.
Note: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone of this Engineer’s Report is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Engineer’s Report and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, portions, zones, or subzones might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
- 8 -
PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The purpose of this District is to provide in part through annual assessments, funding for the installation, operation, and maintenance of landscaping improvements in specified parkways, medians, and roundabouts in the public right-of-way including street trees, and landscaping within specified public areas and public facilities including storm water retention basins that control subdivision water runoff, parks, and easements.
As authorized by the 1972 Act, the improvements provided by the District and associated with each Zone therein may incorporate various local landscaping improvements and related amenities that were either installed in direct connection with the development of properties within the District and each r espective Zone or were installed for the benefit of those properties resulting from property development or potential development of those properties and are considered necessary elements for the development of such properties to their full and best use and these improvements are maintained and serviced for the special benefit of real property within the District and/or Zones. The work to be performed within the District and each respective Zone may include but is not limited to (as applicable), the personn el, materials, equipment, electricity, water, contract services, repair and rehabilitation of the improvements and incidental expenses required to operate the District and provide the improvements and services.
Improvements provided within the District and/or Zone may include but are not limited to landscaping and related facilities and amenities located within designated street medians, parkway and streetscape side-panels, and entryways within the public right of ways or easements adjacent to public right of ways; and within public places including greenbelt areas, open spaces, and local parks within each respective Zone. These improvements may include, but are not limited to:
various landscape materials such as trees, turf, shrubs, vines, ground cover, annual or perineal plantings;
irrigation and drainage systems;
structural amenities such as monuments, specialty or ornamental lighting, block walls, retaining walls, or other fencing associated with the landscape areas; hardscapes including mulch, decomposed granite surfaces, stamped concrete, and pavers; recreational amenities within parks or greenbelts that may include benches, play structures, picnic or other recreational facilities, signage, and related appurtenances.
The maintenance of these improvements may include, but is not limited to the regularly scheduled mowing, trimming, pruning, fertilization, pest control, weed and graffiti abatement; installation, removal, replacement and rehabilitation of the landscaping, repair or replacement of irrigati on or landscape drainage systems; and repair or replacement of hardscape improvements including sidewalks and recreational amenities. The Recreation and Parks Office shall authorize and schedule such maintenance and servicing as needed and based on availab le District and/or Zone funding.
Reference is made to the plans and specifications currently on file at the City Engineer's Office relating to the design, recommended materials, and level of maintenance concerning the facilities to be maintained.
- 9 -
The plans show plant species, size, and their location. Specifications for the improvements comply with the Standard Specifications of the Public Works Department, the 2019 California Building Code, and the Recreation and Parks Department Landscape and Irrigation Standards. For Fiscal Year 2024/2025 the improvements maintained within the District and for which parcels receive special benefits include but is not limited to the following:
SE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. DS-6 TOTAL SQFT.
Miller Medians – all medians south of Stowell Road 48,441 Lincoln Oaks – 1400 to 1500 South Miller on west side going south on Miller Street 98,885 Arbor Ridge – 1500 South Miller on west side going south on Miller Street to Battles Road 13,649 Newlove Frontage – South Miller east and west side from Battles to Newlove Lane and behind fence 41,040
Las Palmas – 1800 South Miller on west side going south on Miller Street from south of Newlove to corner of Inger Street 10,821
Driftwood Gardens – 1400 and 1500 South Miller easements and vines on Battles 21,576 Driftwood Gardens Basin—at Enos and Miller 72,071
Driftwood Meadows – 1800 and 1900 South Miller easements from Inger to Daniels on east side of Miller Street and basin on Inger 26,664
Driftwood Meadows Basin—at Inger and Miller 53,800
Celebration—1900 South Miller easements from Inger to Daniels on west side of Miller Street 1,460 First Christian Church – 1500 South College median by cemetery 6,731 Toys R Us & Edwards – 1400 to 1500 South Bradley medians 7,650 East Betteravia Medians – east of Broadway to Miller Street and east of Miller Street to end of Government Buildings, does not include Crossroads 13,989 Food 4 Less/Lucky Medians – 2400 block South Broadway 7,000 Casa Bonita – 2200 South Miller easements and Centerpoint easements (vines on walls) 9,217 Harvest Ranch – San Ysidro and Miller Street frontages, medians on Capistrano and bike path off La Purisima 12,490
Harvest Ranch Basin—at San Ysidro and Miller Streets 6,009 Toby Villas Basin—2500 South Miller 48,889
Toby Ranch – 2300 South Miller easement and East McCoy to end of street 59,454 Los Cabos (Rancho San Ysidro) – 2500 South Miller easements, vines located on San Ysidro from Miller Street going east bound to end of road and on San Ysidro 13,304 Los Cabos Basin—at McCoy and Miller 68,013
Knightbridge – 2500 South Miller easement, west-side of Miller Street 25,096 Santa Maria Way and South Miller Medians – intersection medians 10,252 Rolling Hills – 3100 Santa Maria Way easements and medians, small and large basins on Dauphin Street No mowing/edging 37,914
Rolling Hills Basins-Two basins along Santa Maria Way 11,436 Sunrise Hills – easements on both north and south sides of Sunrise Drive east of Maramonte Park, medians on South College Street south of Sunrise Drive to McCloud Street and easement on both east and west sides of South College Street from Sunrise Drive to McCloud Street 137,203
- 10 -
Battles Bike Path 115,554
New Love Extension 4,520
Arborwalk – frontage on Miller north of McCoy Lane 23,356 Mission Creek median – Santa Maria Way south of Sunrise Drive 2,030 Betteravia Business Plaza – Daniel Street and Betteravia past the commercial 7,581 Oak Creek Condos – frontage on Miller 8,063
South Broadway Medians – south of Stowell to Betteravia 34,387 South College median north of Santa Maria Way—Paved median 3,762 Total Southeast Landscape Maintenance District No. DS-6 1,062,307
Zones of Benefit
In accordance with the 1972 Act, this District utilizes Zones to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of improvements that provide special benefits to specific parcels and developments within the District. Each Zone is associated with specific improvements and/or types of improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone.
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025 the District includes seven (7) designated Zones. The boundaries of each Zone are based on the improvements to be maintained and the relationship and proximity of the developments and properties that derive special benefits from those specific improvements. The following is a brief description and summary of the improvements associated within each Zone and for which parcels receive special benefits:
Crossroads Commercial Special Benefit Zone
Improvements associated with the Crossroads Commercial Special Benefit Zone include the public landscape easements that include medians on East Betteravia (east of government buildings), the medians on College, and the medians on Bradley; the roundabouts on College and Bradley (estimated 115,180 square feet); the Crossroads Bike Path (estimated 43,141 square feet); Crossroads Basin at College and Southside (estimated 366,187 square feet); Parcel 27 basin bottom (estimated 46,154 square feet); and Betteravia Road off-ramps at Highway 101 (estimated 95,105 square feet); collectively totaling an estimated 37,238 square feet of improvements that includes the maintenance of street trees and recreational elements within the drainage basins.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The Crossroads Commercial Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be $237,423 calculated based on the proportionate area each parcel occupies within the special benefit zone. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels within the Zone that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
- 11 -
The Crossroads Commercial parcels are also assessed the South Miller Street/South College Drive (Southeast) Landscape Maintenance District commercial assessment of $550.50 per assessment unit as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Crossroads Residential Special Benefit Zone
The Crossroads Cottages I and II and the Crossroads Estates subdivisions comprise the Crossroads Residential Special Benefit Zone. Improvements associated with the Crossroads Residential Special Benefit Zone include an estimated 94,117 square feet of landscaped easements, landscaped drainage swale, landscaped bike trail, landscaped park sites, and specialty lighting.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be $501.63 per assessment unit or tenant space. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels within the Zone that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
Crossroads Residential parcels are also assessed the South Miller Street/South College Drive (Southeast) Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $135.75 per assessment unit as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Bradley Square Special Benefit Zone
Improvements associated with the Bradley Square Special Benefit Zone include the roundabout at McCoy and College; the roundabout at Bradley and McCoy; the frontage along McCoy Lane up to the proposed on-ramp; the frontage landscaping along Crossroads Lane, Bradley Road, College to Sunrise, San Ysidro, and Lewis Road; the medians on College; Fire Station 4 landscaping; park frontage along Hawkins, Leahy and Forbes, Leo Trujillo area and entire MPT adjacent to 101. Collectively, these improvement area s total an estimated 350,028 square feet.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The Bradley Square Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be $410.65 per assessor parcel number or tenant space. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels within the Zone that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The Bradley Square Special Benefit Zone parcels are also assessed the South Miller Street/South College Drive (Southeast) Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $135.75 per assessment unit as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Enos Ranch Special Benefit Zone (Commercial and Residential)
- 12 -
Collectively the Enos Ranch Commercial Special Benefit Zone and Enos Ranch Residential Special Benefit Zone benefit from the maintenance of improvements which provide special benefits to parcel with the zone(s) which may include but is not limited to the public landscape easements on Betteravia Road medians and north side, Bradley Rd and College from Betteravia to Battles including medians, both sides of Meehan and Shepard, the south side of Battles along the bike path, the pedestrian path from Inger to College and areas along the Southbound Hwy. 101 offramp(estimated 277,197 square feet); Enos Ranch basin and adjacent landscaped slope(estimated 140,804 square feet). Collectively, the Enos Ranch improvements total an estimated 418,001 square feet. Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, and District administration . Enos Ranch Commercial Special Benefit Zone: Many retail businesses, restaurants, and car dealerships comprise this Special Benefit Zone. The Enos Ranch Special Benefit Zone accounts for costs to maintain improvements which provide special benefits to parcels within the zone. The Enos Ranch Commercial Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 202 4/2025 will be $173,373 calculated based on the proportionate area each parcel occupies within the special benefit zone. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels within the Zone th at receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The Enos Ranch parcels are also assessed the South Miller Street/South College Drive (Southeast) Landscape Maintenance District commercial assessment of $550.50 per APN or tenant space as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Enos Ranch Residential Special Benefit Zone: The Easton Apartments comprise this residential Special Benefit Zone. The Enos Ranch Special Benefit Zone accounts for costs to maintain improvements which provide special benefits to parcels within the zone. Improvements associated with this Special Benefit Zone include the signature ten foot landscaped parkways, tree lined roadways, landscaped medians, and the historic Smith-Enos House and park site.
The Enos Ranch Residential Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be $199.41 per assessor parcel number or tenant space. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels within the Zone that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The Enos Ranch parcels are also assessed the South Miller Street/South College Drive (Southeast) Landscape Maintenance District residential tenant space assessment of $135.75 per residential unit as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Note: A visual depiction of the general location of the landscape improvement areas for the District and Zone boundaries are provided on the District Diagrams provided in Part IV of this Report.
- 13 -
Part II – Method of Apportionment
Legislative Requirements for Assessments
The estimated costs to provide the proposed improvements for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 have been identified and allocated to properties within the District and the Zones therein based on special benefit, consistent with the requirements of the 1972 Act and the assessment provisions of Proposition 218 (being contained in Article XIII D of the California Constitution). The improvements provided by this District and for which properties are assessed are identified as local landscaping improvements in specified parkways, medians, and roundabouts in the public right-of-way including street trees, and landscaping within specified public areas and public facilities including storm water retention basins, parks, easements, and related amenities. The formulas used for calculating assessments and the designation of Zones herein reflect the composition of parcels within the District and the improvements and activities to be provided and have been designed to fairly apportion the cost of providing the improvements based on a determination of the proportional special benefits to each parcel.
Provisions of the 1972 Act
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, including the acquisition, construction, installation and servicing of landscape improvements and related facilities. The 1972 Act requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
Section 22573 defines the net amount to be assessed as follows:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
Section 22574 provides for zones as follows:
“The diagram and assessment may classify various areas within an assessment district into different zones where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements. A zone shall consist of all territory which will receive substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements.”
Provisions of the California Constitution
In addition to the provisions of the 1972 Act, the Article XIII D of the California Constitution outlines specific requirements regarding assessments including the following:
Article XIII D Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service”;
- 14 -
Article XIII D Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.”Article XIII D Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed.
The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
Benefit Analysis
Special Benefits
The ongoing maintenance of landscaped areas within the District as addressed in this Report, provide aesthetic benefits to the properties and a more pleasant environment to walk, drive, live, and/or work.
The primary function of these landscape improvements and related amenities is to serve as an aesthetically pleasing enhancement and green space for the benefit of the immediately surrounding properties and developments for which the improvements were constructed and installed and/or were facilitated by the development or potential development of properties within the District and each respective Zone. In addition, the District pro vided landscaping improvements are an integral part of the physical environment associated with the parcels in the District and/or respective Zones and the proportional direct effect that trees, shrubs, and groundcover have on real property within the district including localized wind reduction; erosion control; storm water capture; noise attenuation; visual screening; ultraviolet light and glare reduction; and odor reduction are a direct and particular benefit to the properties in proximity to those improvements.
While some of the improvements may in part be visible to properties outside the District or Zone, collectively if these various improvements are not properly maintained, it is the parcels within the District and/or respective Zone (as may be applicable), that would be aesthetically burdened or environmentally impacted. Additionally, much of the landscaping within the street right -of-way serve as both a physical buffer as well as a sound reduction buffer between the roadways and the properties in the District and serve as a pleasant aesthetic amenity that enhances the approach to the parcels.
General Benefit
In reviewing the location and extent of the specific landscaped areas and improvements to be funded by District assessments and the proximity and relationship to properties to be assessed it is evident these improvements were primarily installed in connection with the development of properties therein or are improvements that would otherwise be shared by and required for development of properties in the
- 15 -
District or Zone. It is also evident that the maintenance these improvements and the level of maintenance provided has a direct and particular impact (special benefit) only to those properties in proximity to those improvements and such maintenance beyond that which is required to ensure the safety and protection of the general public and property in general, has no direct quantifiable benefit to the public at large or properties outside the District and/or Zones.
In the absence of a special funding District or Zones, the City would typically be obligated to provide only limited (as needed) tree management, weed abatement, rodent control, and erosion control services for the landscape areas currently maintained within the District. This baseline level of service (general benefit level of service) would most likely provide for periodic servicing of the improvement areas on an as-needed basis to ensure public safety and essential property protection to avoid negati ve impacts on adjacent roadways and vehicles traveling on those roadways, and potential property damage resulting from erosion or fire hazards. However, this baseline level of service would clearly result in a far less visually pleasing environment than is created with the enhanced levels of services associated with the regular landscape maintenance provided in the District and funded by the special benefit assessments In addition to the baseline level of service general benefit, it is recognized that there are indirect or incidental general benefits to properties within the District as well as the general public that are associated with regular landscape maintenance services associated with the districtwide improvements, including minimization of dust and debris, and air pollution reduction.
Although these types of benefits might best be characterized as indirect consequences of the special benefit of the landscape maintenance provided to parcels served by the District, for the purposes of this Report we assume these types of benefits to be general benefits, albeit general benefits that are extremely difficult to quantify. Therefore, on behalf of all parcels not assessed by a landscape maintenance district, yet deriving some level of general benefit from the District’s landscaped improvements, the City has historically and will continue to contribute from the general fund a General Benefit Contribution that equals or exceeds the costs attributable to the baseline general benefit costs and indirect/incide ntal general benefit costs for the districtwide shared improvement areas as shown in the Estimate of Costs (Part III of this Report) as the “City General Benefit Contribution”.
- 16 -
Assessment Methodology
To assess benefits equitably it is necessary to calculate each property’s proportional share of the special benefits conferred by the funded improvements and service. The method utilized to determine assessments is called the “method of apportionment” or formula of cost spread ("spread formula"). Assessment Units (“AU”), often referred to as the Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) method of assessment apportionment is utilized for this District and establishes a basic unit (base value) of benefit and then calculates the benefit derived by each assessed parcel as a multiple (or a fraction) of that basic unit. The AU or EBU method of apportioning special benefits is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of comparable property characteristics which may include but is not limited to land use and property size.
The method of apportionment originally developed for this District was based on an assessment spread formula appropriate for the various land uses, identifiable property characteristics and improvements within the District and utilizes an assigned number of comparative dwelling units for residential, non-residential, and undeveloped properties.
The majority of parcels within the District are residential parcels and the improvements are maintained to provide a uniform benefit within the boundaries of the District. Therefore, each dwelling unit, whether an apartment or single family residence is given a base value of one (1) unit.
Parcels in other land use categories were then evaluated and rated by comparison with the bas ic unit.
The assignment of unit values is based primarily on the intensity of land use and its comparison to the base unit. Two unit values have been assigned: a residential efficiency unit, 500 square feet or less, at 50 percent of the residential unit value and a commercial efficiency unit defined at 1200 square feet per commercial charge.
Land Use Classifications
Every parcel within the District is assigned a land use classification based on available parcel information obtained from the County Assessor’s Office. It has been determined that a parcel use and size are the appropriate factors necessary to identify and calculate the proportional spec ial benefits conveyed to each property within the District for the cost of improvements associated with that property. The following are typical site land uses described in Title 12 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code and their proposed Assessment Units. This list includes the majority of parcel uses within the City of Santa Maria and is applied in the calculation of the 202 4/2025 fiscal year assessments.
A summary of the applied Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) for the various land use classifications within the District is shown in the following table:
- 17 -
LAND USE ASSESSMENT UNITS
Residential
Single Family Residential
Two Family Residential
Condominium/Townhouse
Apartment Residential
Mobile Home Parks
Efficiency Unit
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
.5 Unit per dwelling
Commercial
Small, Single Tenant
Efficiency Unit > 1,200 SF
Vacant > 10,000 SF
Commercial Centers
Major Shopping Centers
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per 1,200 SF
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property
Trade/Services
Commercial/Professional Office
Vacant > 25,000 SF
Mid-Size Office
Major Office Buildings
Hospital/Large Medical Offices
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property
7 Units per property
Industrial
Small Industrial
Vacant > 50,000 SF
Medium Industrial
Major Industrial
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property
Exempt
Open Space/Common Areas, Public Facilities, Parks,
Redevelopment Agency
0 Units per property
- 18 -
Part III – Estimate of Costs
The following budgets outline the estimated costs to maintain and service the various landscaping improvements described in this Report for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.
The budgeted expenses outlined in the following pages for the District and the Zones therein reflect the estimated annual expenses required to support and maintain the improvements to be provided for fiscal year 2024/2025. The estimated annual expenses provided in the budgets are considered to be appropriate full-service level costs. These full-service expenses, minus the general benefit expenses (Expenses not assessed and identified as the City’s financial obligation to support the improvements) result in the amount of funding the property owners should reasonably be assessed to fully fund their proportional special benefit from the improvements to be maintained (“Special Benefit Expenses”).
CITY OF SANTA MARIA
SOUTHEAST LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. DS-11
ESTIMATED BUDGET
2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $186,512 $186,512
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $171,594 $285,072
Administration $593,386 $593,386
Total Expenditures $951,492 $1,064,970
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Assessment $688,672 $792,951
City General Benefit Contribution $262,820 $272,019
Total Revenues $951,492 $1,064,970
- 19 -
CROSSROADS COMMERCIAL SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $33,883 $33,883
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $167,202 $175,231
Administration $28,309 $28,309
Total Expenditures $229,394 $237,423
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $229,394 $237,423
Total Revenues $229,394 $237,423
CROSSROADS RESIDENTIAL SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $31,869 $31,869
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $35,339 $38,619
Administration $12,281 $12,281
Total Expenditures $79,489 $82,769
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $79,489 $82,769
Total Revenues $79,489 $82,769
BRADLEY SQUARE SBZ 2023/2024* 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $115,401 $115,401
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $89,625 $14,821
Administration $32,807 $32,807
Total Expenditures $237,833 $163,029
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $237,833 $163,029
Total Revenues $237,833 $163,029
*The totals reported in 2023/2024 were inaccurate; correct total should be $157,516
- 20 -
ENOS RANCH COMMERCIAL SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $1,574 $1,574
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $131,226 $137,089
Administration $34,710 $34,710
Total Expenditures $167,510 $173,373
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $167,510 $173,373
Total Revenues $167,510 $173,373
ENOS RANCH RESIDENTIAL SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $0 $0
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $71,552 $74,235
Administration $5,109 $5,109
Total Expenditures $76,661 $79,344
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $76,661 $79,344
Total Revenues $76,661 $79,344
- 21 -
Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) Pursuant to Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218), any “new or increased assessments” require certain noticing and balloting requirements. However, Government Code Section 54954.6(a) provides that a “new or increased assessment” does not include “an assessment which does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments...previously adopted by the agency or approved by the voters in the area where the assessment is imposed.” This definition of a new or increased assessment is reaffirmed in the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, Government Code Section 53753.5.
As previously adopted and approved by the City Council, each fiscal year the maximum assessment rates established for the improvements in the previous fiscal year for the District and each Zone may be adjusted by the percentage increase of the Local Consumer Price Index (CPI). The Consumer Price Index used for the inflationary adjustment shall be for the Los Angeles- Riverside-Orange County Area for All Urban Consumers, as developed by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The CPI used shall be as determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for a similar period of time.
Each fiscal year the City shall identify the annual percentage change in the CPI, using the difference over a 12-month period between the current year and of the previous year as of January of each succeeding year. This percentage difference shall then establish the range of increase to the maximum assessment rates allowed. If the percentage change in the CPI is negative, the maximum assessment rates shall not be adjusted from the previous fiscal year (unchanged). Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the City may use the revised index or comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living.
The percentage change in CPI from December 202 2 to December 2023 as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics was 3.5 percent. Therefore, the maximum assessment rates for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be increased by 3.5 percent over the maximum assessment rates for fiscal year 2023/2024.
- 22 -
Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams
The following section contains a series of diagrams showing the boundaries of Santa Maria Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-6 and the Zones therein for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. In addition to depicting the boundaries of the Zones, the diagrams also provide a visual depiction of the general location of the improvement areas being funded and maintained within the District and Zones. All parcels that will receive a special benefit from the improvements provided within the District and each respec tive Zone consist of the lots, parcels and subdivision s of land within the boundaries of the District and/or Zones as depicted by these diagrams and the lines and dimensions of those lots, parcels and subdivisions of land shall be those lines and dimensions sho wn on the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s parcel maps for the current fiscal year and by reference the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s parcel maps are incorporated herein and made part of this Report. These diagrams along with the Assessment Roll incorporated in Part V of this Report constitute the District Assessment Diagram for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.
- 23 -
District Boundary Diagram
- 24 -
District Improvement Diagram (Northern Section)
- 25 -
District Improvement Diagram (Southern Section)
- 26 -
Crossroads Commercial Special Benefit Zone
- 27 -
Crossroads Residential Special Benefit Zone
- 28 -
Bradley Square Special Benefit Zone
- 29 -
Enos Ranch Commercial and Residential Special Benefit Zone
- 30 -
Part V - Assessment Rolls
Due to the number of parcels in the District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2024 /2025 (a listing of the parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts) has been filed with the City Clerk in an electronic format and is, by reference, made part of this Report. The proposed Assessment Roll shall be available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during normal office hours.
The Assessment Roll identified the parcels within the District that are assessed for special benefits and their corresponding assessment amount(s) for fiscal year 2024/2025. Each parcel listed on the Assessment Roll is currently shown and illustrated on the County Assessor's Roll and the County Assessor’s Parcel Number Maps (APN maps). These records are, by reference, made part of this Report and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. All assessments presented on the assessment roll are subject to change as a result of parcel changes made by the County including parcel splits, parcel merges or development changes that occur prior to the County A ssessor's Office securing the final roll and generating tax bills for fiscal year 2024 /2025.
EXHIBIT D
Annual Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025
Southwest Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-11
Incorporating Special Benefit Zones:
Westgate Ranch
Cherrywood
Coyway
Rose Garden Village
Stowell Center Plaza
Acquistapace
Village at Westgate Ranch
C-4 Development
Intent to Levy Meeting: May 21, 2024
Public Hearing: June 4, 2024
City of Santa Maria
110 E. Cook Street
Santa Maria, CA 93454
Prepared by: Scott Christian, Operations Manager
- 2 -
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
This report and the enclosed descriptions, budgets, and diagrams outline the proposed improvements and assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-11 in the City of Santa Maria for Fiscal Year 2024/2025, which includes each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within said District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
- 3 -
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. - 4 - Report Content and Annual Proceedings ................................................................... - 4 - PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ........................................................................... - 8 - Zones of Benefit ....................................................................................................... - 10 - Part II – Method of Apportionment ............................................................................ - 14 - Benefit Analysis ........................................................................................................ - 15 - Assessment Methodology ........................................................................................ - 17 - Part III – Estimate of Costs .......................................................................................... - 19 - Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) ............................... - 23 - Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams................................................................................. - 24 - District Boundary Diagram ....................................................................................... - 25 - District Improvement Diagram (Northern Section) ................................................. - 26 - District Improvement Diagram (Southern Section) ................................................. - 27 - Westgate Ranch Special Benefit Zone...................................................................... - 28 - Cherrywood Special Benefit Zone ............................................................................ - 29 - Coyway Special Benefit Zone ................................................................................... - 30 - Rose Garden Village Special Benefit Zone ............................................................... - 31 - Stowell Center Plaza Special Benefit Zone ............................................................... - 32 - Acquistapace Special Benefit Zone .......................................................................... - 33 - Village at Westgate Ranch Special Benefit Zone ...................................................... - 34 - C-4 Development Special Benefit Zone .................................................................... - 35 - Part V - Assessment Rolls ............................................................................................ - 36 -
- 4 -
INTRODUCTION
The City of Santa Maria (“City”), under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”) and in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID (“California Constitution”) annually levies and collects special assessments for the City’s maintenance assessment district designated as Southwest Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-11 (hereafter referred to as “District”) to fund in whole or in part the maintenance and operation of landscaping improvements that provide special benefits to properties within the District.
The City Council on May 2, 1989, established the formation of the Southwest Landscape Maintenance District No. DS-11 for the purpose of financing the continued maintenance of the landscaping within the southwest quadrant of the City.
In accordance with the 1972 Act, the District also utilizes special benefit zones (“Zones”) to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements that provide special benefits to specific parcels and developments within the District. Within the boundaries of the District, some parcels may be assigned to a special benefit zone, each of which is associated with specifi c improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone that are in addition to the improvements proportionally shared by properties throughout the District.
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025 in addition to the shared District improvements and assessments, parcels within the following Zones may be assessed for local improvements specific to the parcels and developments within each respective Zone:
Westgate Ranch Special Benefit Zone,
Cherrywood Special Benefit Zone,
Coyway Special Benefit Zone,
Rose Garden Village Special Benefit Zone,
Stowell Center Plaza Special Benefit Zone,
Acquistapace Special Benefit Zone,
Village at Westgate Ranch Special Benefit Zone,
C-4 Development Special Benefit Zone,
Report Content and Annual Proceedings
This Engineer’s Annual Report (the “Report”) has been prepared pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 4 and Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act, and presented to the City Council for their consideration and approval of the proposed improvements and services to be provided within the District and the levy and collection of annual assessments related thereto for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. This Report outlines the District improvements, the special benefit zones, the method of apportionment, and proposed assessments to be levied in connection with the special benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and
- 5 -
servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a source of funding to fund in whole or in part, the continued operation and maintenance of the landscaping improvements and services to be provided by the District for the properties within the District and specified Zones for which the properties receive special benefits.
Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the authorized District improvements and based upon available revenues including assessment revenues, fund balances, general benefit contributions and any additional City contributions from available sources. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include, but are not limited to the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District; deficits or surpluses from prior years; revenues from other sources; and the collection of funds for operational reserves and/or periodic repairs, replacements and rehabilitation projects as authorized by the 1972 Act. The net annual cost to provide the improvements within the District plus each benefit Zone (if applicable) are allocated to the benefiting properties within the District and respective Zones as applicable, using a weighted method of apportionment (refer to Assessment Methodology in Section II, Method of Apportionment) that calculates the proportional special benefit and assessment for each parcel as compared to other properties that benefit from the District improvements and services. Thus, each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.
The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s Office. The Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the District assessments.
At a noticed annual Public Hearing, the City Council will accept all public comments and written protests regarding the District and the annual levy of assessments. Based on those public comments and written protests, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted.
Following final approval of the Report and confirmation of the assessments, the City Council will by Resolution, order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.
As required by the 1972 Act, this Engineer’s Report describes the improvements to be provided, maintained, and serviced by the District, an estimated budget for the District improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District for fiscal year 2024/2025.
Part I – Plans and Specifications: This section contains a general description of the District, special benefit zones (“Zones”), and the improvements and services that provide special benefits to the parcels within the District. The improvements, appurtenant facilities, and services that provide special benefits to the
- 6 -
properties within the District and for which parcels are assessed may include, but not limited to the installation and maintenance of landscaping improvements within the public right-of-way of streets within the District, retention basins, parks, public facilities and related amenities as well as associated operational and incidental expenses, and the collection of fund balances authorized by the 1972 Act. The plans and specifications contained in this Report generally describe the nature and extent of the improvements. In conjunction with these general descriptions, a visual depiction of the improvements may be provided in the District Diagrams contained in Part IV of this Report. More detailed information regarding the specific plans and specifications associated with the District improvements and Zone improvements are on file in the City Engineer’s Office and by reference are made part of this Report.
Part II – Method of Apportionment: This section includes a discussion of the special and general benefits associated with the improvements to be provided within the District (Benefit Analysis). This section of the Report also outlines the basis upon which the estimated costs to provide such improvements has been apportioned to each parcel of land therein in proportion to the special benefits to b e received. (the method of calculating each property’s proportional special benefit assessment). This method of apportionment is consistent with the previously approved and adopted method of apportionment for the District.
Part III – Estimate of Costs: Identifies the estimated annual funding costs (Budgets) required for the maintenance and operation of the improvements in the District and Zones authorized by the 1972 Act and deemed appropriate to support the improvements, including, but not limited to, annual maintenance and service expenses, utility costs, and related incidental expenses. For fiscal year 202 4/2025 annual contract maintenance costs have increased by three percent (3.5%). Those improvements and/or costs determined to be of general benefit shall be funded by a City contribution. In addition to the general benefit costs, the City may provide additional funding to support the maintenance and operation of the improvements considered to be of special benefit, but City staff shall make the determin ation of which improvements, and the extent of the services and activities that shall be provided based on available revenues.
This section also identifies and outlines an Assessment Range Formula (inflationary adjust) previously approved and adopted for the District assessments that provides for an annual adjustment to the maximum assessment rates, which establishes limits on future assessments, but also provides for reasonable cost adjustments due to inflation.
Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams: This section of the Report contains a series of diagrams showing the boundaries of the District and Zones for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 which incorporate the parcels determined to receive special benefits from the District improvements. These diagrams may also provide a visual depiction of the location of the improvements being maintained. The lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land contained in the District and Zone diagrams are inclusive of the parcels listed in “Part V - Assessment Roll” of this Report and the corresponding County Assessor’s Parcel Maps for said parcels as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and shall incorporate all subsequent
- 7 -
subdivisions, lot-line adjustments, or parcel changes therein. Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land within the District and Zones.
Part V – Assessment Roll: The assessment amounts to be levied and collected in fiscal year 2024/2025 for each parcel is based on the parcel’s calculated proportional special benefit as outlined in "Part II - Method of Apportionment" and the annual assessment rates established by the estimated budgets in "Part III - Estimate of Costs" of this Report. Due to the number of parcels within the District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2024/2025 has been filed electronically with the City Clerk rather than displayed in this Report and by reference the listing of the Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and the corresponding assessment amounts are made part of this Report.
Note: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone of this Engineer’s Report is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision o f any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Engineer’s Report and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, portions, zones, or subzones might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
- 8 -
PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The purpose of this District is to provide in part through annual assessments, funding for the installation, operation, and maintenance of landscaping improvements in specified parkways, medians, and roundabouts in the public right-of-way including street trees, and landscaping within specified public areas and public facilities including storm water retention basins that control subdivision water runoff, parks, and easements.
As authorized by the 1972 Act, the improvements provided by the District and associated with each Zone therein may incorporate various local landscaping improvements and related amenities that were either installed in direct connection with the development of properties within the District and each respective Zone or were installed for the benefit of those properties resulting from property development or potential development of those properties and are considered necessary elements for the development of such properties to their full and best use and these improvements are maintained and serviced for the special benefit of real property within the District and/or Zones. The work to be performed within the District and each respective Zone may include but is not limited to (as applicable), the personnel, materials, equipment, electricity, water, contract services, repair and rehab ilitation of the improvements and incidental expenses required to operate the District and provide the improvements and services.
Improvements provided within the District and/or Zone may include but are not limited to landscaping and related facilities and amenities located within designated street medians, parkway and streetscape side-panels, and entryways within the public right of ways or easements adjacent to public right of ways; and within public places including greenbelt areas, open spaces, and local parks within each respective Zone. These improvements may include, but are not limited to:
various landscape materials such as trees, turf, shrubs, vines, ground cover, annual or perineal plantings;
irrigation and drainage systems;
structural amenities such as monuments, specialty or ornamental lighting, block walls, retaining walls, or other fencing associated with the landscape areas; hardscapes including mulch, decomposed granite surfaces, stamped concrete, and pavers; recreational amenities within parks or greenbelts that may include benches, play structures, picnic or other recreational facilities, signage, and related appurtenances.
The maintenance of these improvements may include, but is not limited to the regularly scheduled mowing, trimming, pruning, fertilization, pest control, weed and graffiti abatement; installation, removal, replacement and rehabilitation of the landscaping, repair or replacement of irrigation or landscape drainage systems; and repair or replacement of hardscape improvements including sidewalks and recreational amenities. The Recreation and Parks Office shall authorize and schedule such maintenance and servicing as needed and based on available District and/or Zone funding.
Reference is made to the plans and specifications currently on file at the City Engineer's Office relating to the design, recommended materials, and level of maintenance concerning the facilities to be maintained.
- 9 -
The plans show plant species, size, and their location. Specifications for the improvements co mply with the Standard Specifications of the Public Works Department, the 2019 California Building Code, and the Recreation and Parks Department Landscape and Irrigation Standards. For Fiscal Year 2024/2025 the improvements maintained within the District and for which parcels receive special benefits include but is not limited to the following:
SW LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. DS-11 TOTAL SQFT.
Terrace Park – 500 to 600 West Carmen Lane. This includes the frontage on Carmen, both sides of Depot, and the slope at the end of Depot, but not the area that extends behind the homes (it is the responsibility of the HOA).
14,401
Fire Station II – 400 West Carmen Lane frontage and interior, including easement on South Thornburg Street & slope 7,631
West Betteravia Median – 100 block West Betteravia Road 1,200 Country Club Village III – frontage on West McCoy Lane, entry medians, La Costa Basin/Marilyn Stanley Park, La Costa Breezeway – across from the basin/park site - breezeway off Castlerock leading to Hagerman bike trail
135,986
Foxenwoods Country Club Estates – 800 to 1100 West McCoy Lane 47,401 Santa Barbara Research Median – median on South Blosser Road 2,392 Skyway Drive Medians – all medians on Skyway Drive 104,031 Battles Bike Path – west of Broadway 14,000
Santa Maria Police Department 10,750
SMAT Station 32,715
Blending Station – Fairway and Skyway Drive 1,940
Paseo del Sol – frontages on South Westgate, South A, Carmen and West Via Rosa, and medians on Betteravia 56,103
Paseo del Sol Basin—at Carmen and A Street (empty trash cans) 45,572 Hagerman Bike Path - west of Hagerman Complex – paved path 68,800 Westridge – frontages and median on Carmen and basin/playground 44,613 Westridge Basin—along Via Rosa 37,240
Skyway and Foster Road Bike Path-paved path 106,984
Medians on Betteravia east and west of Blosser 9,968
Blosser/Stowell Medians-Paved medians 5,104
South Broadway Medians – south of Stowell to Betteravia 34,387 Parkland Cottages - McCoy frontage 10,943
Union Valley Parkway 512,222
Union Valley open space 40,075
Foxenwoods Estates 30,000
VTC Frontage 11,076
Dal Porto 3,006
Total Southwest Landscape Maintenance District No. DS-11 1,388,540
- 10 -
Zones of Benefit
In accordance with the 1972 Act, this District utilizes Zones to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of improvements that provide special benefits to specific parcels and developments within the District. Each Zone is associated with specific improvements and/or types of improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone.
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025 the District includes eleven (11) designated Zones. The boundaries of each Zone are based on the improvements to be maintained and the relationship and proximity of the developments and properties that derive special benefits from those specific improvements. The following is a brief description and summary of the improvements associated within each Zone and for which parcels receive special benefits:
Westgate Ranch Special Benefit Zone
Improvements associated with the Westgate Ranch Special Benefit Zone include the public landscape easement frontages on Battles, A Street, Westgate, Carmen, Sonya and Blosser, the medians on Carmen and the roundabout by the school and both multi-purpose trails and parkways along Park totaling an estimated 367,536 square feet of improvements.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The Westgate Ranch Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be $407.79 per assessor parcel number or tenant space. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels within the Zone that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The Westgate Ranch Special Benefit parcels are assessed the Southwest Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $264.72 per assessment unit as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Cherrywood Special Benefit Zone
Improvements associated with the Cherrywood Special Benefit Zone include the public landscape easement frontages on Carmen, Depot, Sonya and T hornburg, the pathway on Flora, and the pocket park on Thornburg totaling an estimated 22,151 square feet of improvements.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The Cherrywood Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be $417.47 per assessor parcel number. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels within the Zone that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
- 11 -
The Cherrywood Special Benefit Zone parcels are also assessed the Southwest Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $264.72 per assessment unit as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Coyway Special Benefit Zone
The Coyway subdivision consists of 12 commercial parcels. Improvements associated with the Coyway Special Benefit Zone include the public landscape easement at the corner of W. McCoy and Professional Parkway (an estimated 21,726 square feet) and the landscaped storm water retention basin (an estimated 13,349 square feet) totaling an estimated 35,075 square feet of improvements.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The Coyway Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be $7,365 calculated based on the proportionate area each parcel occupies within the special benefit zone.
This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels within the Zone that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The Coyway Special Benefit Zone parcels are also assessed the Southwest Landscape Maintenance District commercial assessment of $550.50 per parcel as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Rose Garden Village Special Benefit Zone
The improvements that are associated with the Rose Garden Village Special Benefit Zone include the median on Blosser Road, the public easement frontages on Battles, Sonya, Biscayne, Western, Pergola, Provance, the multi-purpose trail, the park site, basin, and the street trees within the Zone totaling an estimated 310,157 square feet of improvements.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The Rose Garden Village Special Benefit Zone Assessment for FY 2024/2025 will be $477.19 per assessor parcel number or tenant space. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels within the Zone that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The Rose Garden Village Special Benefit Zone parcels are also assessed the Southwest Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $264.72 per assessment unit as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Acquistapace Special Benefit Zone
The improvements that are associated with the Acquistapace Special Benefit Zone at build out will include the median on Blosser Road, the public easement frontages on Sonya, Carmen, Western, Pergola, Biscayne,
- 12 -
Blosser, the multi-purpose trail, and the open space (Lot 170) (an estimated 129,217 square feet), as well as the Sonya Basin (grassy park site/basin) located along Sonya (an additional 268,935 square feet), and the street trees within the Zone collectively totaling an estimated 398,152 square feet of improvements.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, renovation, graffiti removal, utility costs, and District administration. The Acquistapace Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be $297.79 per assessor parcel number. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels within the Zone that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The Acquistapace Special Benefit Zone parcels are also assessed the Southwest Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $264.72 per assessment unit or tenant space as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Stowell Center Plaza Special Benefit Zone
The Stowell Center Plaza owners will be assessed $787.58 per typical 2,500 square feet of retail space.
These funds will be used for re-payment of a loan to resurface the parking lot; parking lot maintenance; trash pickup; cleaning public sidewalks, parking lot lighting/other electrical service and landscape maintenance. This assessment is imposed only upon parcels within the Zone that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The Stowell Center Plaza Special Benefit Zone parcels are also assessed the Southwest Landscape Maintenance District commercial assessment of $550.50 per parcel as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Village at Westgate Ranch Special Benefit Zone
The improvements associated with the Village at Westgate Ranch Special Benefit Zone include the public easement areas along the street frontages on Blosser Road, La Brea Avenue, Battles Road, Westgate Road, Marsala Avenue, and Sonya Lane (an estimated 345,107 square feet), as well as the Battles linear basin bottom from Blosser to the county flood control basin (an estimated 92,529 square feet), and the street trees within the Zone collectively totaling an estimated 437,636 square feet of improvements.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The Village at Westgate Ranch Special Benefit Zone assessments for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be $512.16 per assessor parcel number or tenant space. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels within the Zone that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The Village at Westgate Ranch Special Benefit Zone parcels are also assessed the Southwest Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $264.72 per assessment unit as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
- 13 -
C-4 Development Special Benefit Zone
This subdivision currently consists of six (6) professional services parcels including the retention basin. At build out there will be two (2) two-story office buildings, two (2) one-story commercial buildings, and one (1) commercial building for recreational vehicle storage. The improvements associated with the C-4 Development Special Benefit Zone include the landscape storm water retention basin at McCoy totaling an estimated 32,609 square feet.
Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The C-4 Development Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be $21,272 and assessed on percentage of square footage of each assessor parcel number. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels within the Zone that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.
The C-4 Development Special Benefit Zone parcels are also assessed the Southwest Landscape Maintenance District commercial assessment of $550.50 per parcel as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
Note: A visual depiction of the general location of the landscape improvement areas for the District and Zone boundaries are provided on the District Diagrams provided in Part IV of this Report.
- 14 -
Part II – Method of Apportionment
Legislative Requirements for Assessments
The estimated costs to provide the proposed improvements for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 have been identified and allocated to properties within the District and the Zones therein based on special benefit, consistent with the requirements of the 1972 Act and the assessment provisions of Proposition 218 (being contained in Article XIII D of the California Constitution). The improvements provided by this District and for which properties are assessed are identified as local landscaping improvements in specified parkways, medians, and roundabouts in the public right-of-way including street trees, and landscaping within specified public areas and public facilities including storm water retention basins, parks, easements, and related amenities. The formulas used for calculating assessments and the designation of Zones herein reflect the composition of parcels within the District and the improvements and activities to be provided and have been designed to fairly apportion the cost of providing the improvements based on a determination of the proportional special benefits to each parcel.
Provisions of the 1972 Act
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, including the acquisition, construction, installation and servicing of landscape improvements and related facilities. The 1972 Act requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
Section 22573 defines the net amount to be assessed as follows:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
Section 22574 provides for zones as follows:
“The diagram and assessment may classify various areas within an assessment district into different zones where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements. A zone shall consist of all territory which will receive substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements.”
Provisions of the California Constitution
In addition to the provisions of the 1972 Act, the Article XIII D of the California Constitution outlines specific requirements regarding assessments including the following:
Article XIII D Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service”;
- 15 -
Article XIII D Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.” Article XIII D Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed.
The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
Benefit Analysis
Special Benefits
The ongoing maintenance of landscaped areas within the District as addressed in this Report, provide aesthetic benefits to the properties and a more pleasant environment to walk, drive, live, and/or work.
The primary function of these landscape improvements and related amenities is to serve as an aesthetically pleasing enhancement and green space for the benefit of the immediately surrounding properties and developments for which the improvements were constructed and installed and/or were facilitated by the development or potential development of properties within the District and each respective Zone. In addition, the District provided landscaping improvements are an integral part of the physical environment associated with the parcels in the District and/or respective Zones and the proportional direct effect that trees, shrubs, and groundcover have on real property within the district including localized wind reduction; erosion control; storm water capture; noise attenuation; visual screening; ultraviolet light and glare reduction; and odor reduction are a direct and particular benefit to the properties in proximity to those improvements.
While some of the improvements may in part be visible to properties outside the District or Zone, collectively if these various improvements are not properly maintained, it is the parcels within the District and/or respective Zone (as may be applicable), that would be aesthetically burdened or environmentally impacted. Additionally, much of the landscaping within the street right -of-way serve as both a physical buffer as well as a sound reduction buffer between the roadways and the properties in the District and serve as a pleasant aesthetic amenity that enhances the approach to the parcels.
General Benefit
In reviewing the location and extent of the specific landscaped areas and improvements to be funded by District assessments and the proximity and relationship to properties to be assessed it is evident these improvements were primarily installed in connection with the development of properties therein or are improvements that would otherwise be shared by and required for development of properties in the
- 16 -
District or Zone. It is also evident that the maintenance these improvements and the level of maintenance provided has a direct and particular impact (special benefit) only to those properties in proximity to those improvements and such maintenance beyond that which is required to ensure the safety and protection of the general public and property in general, has no direct quantifiable benefit to the public at large or properties outside the District and/or Zones.
In the absence of a special funding District or Zones, the City would typically be obligated to provide only limited (as needed) tree management, weed abatement, rodent control, and erosion control services for the landscape areas currently maintained within the District. This baseline level of service (general benefit level of service) would most likely provide for periodic servicing of the improvement areas on an as-needed basis to ensure public safety and essential property protection to avoid negative impacts on adjacent roadways and vehicles traveling on those roadways, and potential property damage resulting from erosion or fire hazards. However, this baseline level of service would clearly result in a far less visually pleasing environment than is created with the enhanced levels of services associated with the regular landscape maintenance provided in the District and funded by the special benefit assessments In addition to the baseline level of service general benefit, it is recognized that there are indirect or incidental general benefits to properties within the District as well as the general public that are associated with regular landscape maintenance services associated with the districtwide improvements, including minimization of dust and debris, and air pollution reduction.
Although these types of benefits might best be characterized as indirect consequences of the special benefit of the landscape maintenance provided to parcels served by the District, for the purposes of this Report we assume these types of benefits to be general benefits, albeit general benefits that are extremely difficult to quantify. Therefore, on behalf of all parcels not assessed by a landscape maintenance district, yet deriving some level of general benefit from the District’s landscaped improvements, the City has historically and will continue to contribute from the general fund a General Benefit Contribution that equals or exceeds the costs attributable to the baseline general benefit costs and indirect/incidental general benefit costs for the districtwide shared improvement areas as shown in the Estimate of Costs (Part III of this Report) as the “City General Benefit Contribution”.
- 17 -
Assessment Methodology
To assess benefits equitably it is necessary to calculate each property’s proportional share of the special benefits conferred by the funded improvements and service. The method utilized to determine assessments is called the “method of apportionment” or formula of cost spread ("spread formula"). Assessment Units (“AU”), often referred to as the Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) method of assessment apportionment is utilized for this District and establishes a basic unit (base value) of benefit and then calculates the benefit derived by each assessed parcel as a multiple (or a fraction) of that basic unit. The AU or EBU method of apportioning special benefits is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of comparable property characteristics which may include but is not limited to land use and property size.
The method of apportionment originally developed for this District was based on an assessment spread formula appropriate for the various land uses, identifiable property characteristics and improvements within the District and utilizes an assigned number of comparative dwelling units for residential, non-residential, and undeveloped properties.
The majority of parcels within the District are residential parcels and the improvements are maintained to provide a uniform benefit within the boundaries of the District. Therefore, each dwelling unit, whether an apartment or single family residence is given a base value of one (1) unit.
Parcels in other land use categories were then evaluated and rated by comparison with the basic unit.
The assignment of unit values is based primarily on the intensity of land use and its comparison to the base unit. Two unit values have been assigned: a residential efficiency unit, 500 square feet or less, at 50 percent of the residential unit value and a commercial efficiency unit defined at 1200 square feet per commercial charge.
Land Use Classifications
Every parcel within the District is assigned a land use classification based on available parcel information obtained from the County Assessor’s Office. It has been determined that a parcel use and size are the appropriate factors necessary to identify and calculate the proportional special benefits conveyed to each property within the District for the cost of improvements associated with that property. The following are typical site land uses described in Title 12 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code and their proposed Assessment Units. This list includes the majority of parcel uses within the City of Santa Maria and is applied in the calculation of the 202 4/2025 fiscal year assessments.
A summary of the applied Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) for the various land use classifications within the District is shown in the following table:
- 18 -
LAND USE ASSESSMENT UNITS
Residential
Single Family Residential
Two Family Residential
Condominium/Townhouse
Apartment Residential
Mobile Home Parks
Efficiency Unit
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
.5 Unit per dwelling
Commercial
Small, Single Tenant
Efficiency Unit > 1,200 SF
Vacant > 10,000 SF
Commercial Centers
Major Shopping Centers
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per 1,200 SF
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property
Trade/Services
Commercial/Professional Office
Vacant > 25,000 SF
Mid-Size Office
Major Office Buildings
Hospital/Large Medical Offices
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property
7 Units per property
Industrial
Small Industrial
Vacant > 50,000 SF
Medium Industrial
Major Industrial
1 Unit per property
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property
Exempt
Open Space/Common Areas, Public Facilities, Parks,
Redevelopment Agency
0 Units per property
- 19 -
Part III – Estimate of Costs
The following budgets outline the estimated costs to maintain and service the various landscaping improvements described in this Report for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.
The budgeted expenses outlined in the following pages for the District and the Zones therein reflect the estimated annual expenses required to support and maintain the improvements to be provided for fiscal year 2024/2025. The estimated annual expenses provided in the budgets are considered to be appropriate full-service level costs. These full-service expenses, minus the general benefit expenses (Expenses not assessed and identified as the City’s financial obligation to support the improvements) result in the amount of funding the property owners should reasonably be assessed to fully fund their proportional special benefit from the improvements to be maintained (“Special Benefit Expenses”).
CITY OF SANTA MARIA
SOUTHWEST LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. DS-11
ESTIMATED BUDGET
2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $142,874 $142,874
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $553,711 $540,265
Administration $749,072 $749,072
Total Expenditures $1,445,657 $1,432,211
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Assessment $1,153,899 $1,130,241
City General Benefit Contribution $291,758 $301,970
Total Revenues $1,445,657 $1,432,211
- 20 -
WESTGATE RANCH SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $43,849 $43,849
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $231,690 $242,619
Administration $36,706 $36,706
Total Expenditures $312,245 $323,174
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $312,245 $323,174
Total Revenues $312,245 $323,174
CHERRYWOOD SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $15,106 $15,106
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $30,270 $30,044
Administration $14,724 $14,724
Total Expenditures $60,100 $59,874
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $60,100 $59,874
Total Revenues $60,100 $59,874
COYWAY SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities - -
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $4,858 $5,107
Administration $2,258 $2,258
Total Expenditures $7,116 $7,365
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $7,116 $7,365
Total Revenues $7,116 $7,365
- 21 -
ROSE GARDEN VILLAGE SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $29,163 $39,163
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $111,626 $182,148
Administration $26,122 $31,122
Total Expenditures $166,911 $252,433
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $166,911 $252,433
Total Revenues $166,911 $252,433
ACQUISTAPACE SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $23,078 $23,078
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $44,049 $58,924
Administration $19,481 $19,481
Total Expenditures $86,608 $101,483
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $86,608 $101,483
Total Revenues $86,608 $101,483
STOWELL CENTER PLAZA SBZ 2023/2024* 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $5,455 $7,955
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $14,748 $27,656
Administration $1,255 $1,855
Total Expenditures $21,458 $37,466
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $21,458 $37,466
Total Revenues $21,458 $37,466
*Undervalued last cycle should have been $36,199.20
- 22 -
VILLAGE AT WESTGATE RANCH SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $18,882 $18,882
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $231,025 $241,954
Administration $62,338 $62,338
Total Expenditures $312,245 $323,174
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $312,245 $323,174
Total Revenues $312,245 $323,174
C-4 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT SBZ 2023/2024 2024/2025
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $2,938 $2,938
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $14,082 $14,801
Administration $3,533 $3,533
Total Expenditures $20,553 $21,272
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $20,553 $21,272
Total Revenues $20,553 $21,272
- 23 -
Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) Pursuant to Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218), any “new or increased assessments” require certain noticing and balloting requirements. However, Government Code Section 54954.6(a) provides that a “new or increased assessment” does not include “an assessment whi ch does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments...previously adopted by the agency or approved by the voters in the area where the assessment is imposed.” This definition of a new or increased assessment is reaffirmed in the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, Government Code Section 53753.5.
As previously adopted and approved by the City Council, each fiscal year the maximum assessment rates established for the improvements in the previous fiscal year for the District and each Zon e may be adjusted by the percentage increase of the Local Consumer Price Index (CPI). The Consumer Price Index used for the inflationary adjustment shall be for the Los Angeles- Riverside-Orange County Area for All Urban Consumers, as developed by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The CPI used shall be as determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for a similar period of time.
Each fiscal year the City shall identify the annual percentage change in the CPI, using the difference over a 12-month period between the current year and of the previous year as of January of each succeeding year. This percentage difference shall then establish the range of increase to the maximum assessment rates allowed. If the percentage change in the CPI is negative, the maximum assessment rates shall not be adjusted from the previous fiscal year (unchanged). Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the City may use the revised index or comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living.
The percentage change in CPI from December 202 2 to December 2023 as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics was 3.5 percent. Therefore, the maximum assessment rates for fiscal year 2024/2025 will be increased by 3.5 percent over the maximum assessment rates for fiscal year 2023/2024.
- 24 -
Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams
The following section contains a series of diagrams showing the boundaries of Santa Maria Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-11 and the Zones therein for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. In addition to depicting the boundaries of the Zones, the diagrams also provide a visual depiction of the general location of the improvement areas being funded and maintained within the District and Zones. All parcels that will receive a special benefit from the improvements provided within the District and ea ch respective Zone consist of the lots, parcels and subdivisions of land within the boundaries of the Distric t and/or Zones as depicted by these diagrams and the lines and dimensions of those lots, parcels and subdivisions of land shall be those lines and dimen sions shown on the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s parcel maps for the current fiscal year and by reference the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s parcel maps are incorporated herein and made part of this Report. These diagrams along with the Assessment Roll incorporated in Part V of this Report constitute the District Assessment Diagram for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.
- 25 -
District Boundary Diagram
- 26 -
District Improvement Diagram (Northern Section)
- 27 -
District Improvement Diagram (Southern Section)
- 28 -
Westgate Ranch Special Benefit Zone
- 29 -
Cherrywood Special Benefit Zone
- 30 -
Coyway Special Benefit Zone
- 31 -
Rose Garden Village Special Benefit Zone
- 32 -
Stowell Center Plaza Special Benefit Zone
- 33 -
Acquistapace Special Benefit Zone
- 34 -
Village at Westgate Ranch Special Benefit Zone
- 35 -
C-4 Development Special Benefit Zone
- 36 -
Part V - Assessment Rolls
Due to the number of parcels in the District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2024/2025 (a listing of the parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts) has been filed with the City Clerk in an electronic format and is, by reference, made part of this Report. The proposed Assessment Roll shall be available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during normal office hours.
The Assessment Roll identified the parcels within the District that are assessed for special benefits and their corresponding assessment amount(s) for fiscal year 2024/2025. Each parcel listed on the Assessment Roll is currently shown and illustrated on the County Assessor's Roll and the County Assessor’s Parcel Number Maps (APN maps). These records are, by reference, made part of this Report and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. All assessments presented on the assessment roll are subject to change as a result of parcel changes made by the County including parcel splits, parcel merges or development changes that occur prior to the County Assessor's Office securing the final roll and generating tax bills for fiscal year 2024 /2025.
Fund
Number
Parcel
Number District Zone FY24-25
Parcel Count
FY 24-25 District
Assessment
FY24-25 Zone
Assessment
FY24-25 Total
Assessment Situs Owner
3936 117-510-008 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 111 E DONOVAN RD GONZALEZ HENDRICK 3936 117-510-009 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1606 N BROADWAY SOFIJON LLC 3936 117-510-011 NE 1 1,466.61$ -$ 1,466.61$ 1640 N BROADWAY HERRERA MARIA 3936 121-011-005 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1520 N BROADWAY GENESIS KC DEVELOPMENT LLC 3936 121-011-007 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1503 N MCCLELLAND ST POWER OF GOD CHRISTIAN CENTER 3936 121-012-006 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 222 E DONOVAN RD POULOS DIMITRIOS P 3936 121-012-007 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 202 E DONOVAN RD DONOVAN ROAD LLC 3936 121-012-011 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ POBOX 5759 DONOVAN ROAD MU LLC 3936 121-012-012 NE 1 1,326.18$ -$ 1,326.18$ 214 E DONOVAN RD DONOVAN ROAD MU LLC 3936 121-031-024 NE 1 14,650.07$ -$ 14,650.07$ 1324 N BROADWAY PINI DARIO L TRUST 3/2/15 3936 121-032-020 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1208 N BROADWAY ASOL LLC 3936 121-051-004 NE 1 3,557.19$ -$ 3,557.19$ 121 E BUNNY AVE HOLLINGSEAD BLANCHE ROSE REVOCABLE TRUST 10/10/08
3936 121-151-001 NE 1 1,466.61$ -$ 1,466.61$ 500 N BROADWAY SM BROADWAY PROPERTIES LLC 3936 121-152-014 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 123 E FESLER ST GREAT WHITE DENTAL II INC 3936 121-152-017 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 400 N BROADWAY ALWAREETH IBRAHIM A SR 3936 121-193-008 NE 1 1,919.06$ -$ 1,919.06$ 311 N MILLER ST BHATIA SAROJ 3936 121-203-011 NE 1 1,185.73$ -$ 1,185.73$ 625 E MILL ST CHAVEZ DANIEL & ALYSON TRUST 6/11/13 3936 121-203-021 NE 1 889.30$ -$ 889.30$ 305 EAST AVE A HERRERA LUCAS JR 3936 121-203-022 NE 1 1,185.73$ -$ 1,185.73$ 301 EAST AVE HERRERA LUCAS JR 3936 121-224-040 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 120 N BROADWAY CITY OF SANTA MARIA 3936 121-224-041 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 120 N BROADWAY UNION PLAZA 3936 121-225-005 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 323 E CHAPEL ST SADOWSKI/SADOWSKA FAMILY TRUST 3936 121-225-006 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 309 E CHAPEL ST JORDAN 2011 FAMILY TRUST 6/24/11 3936 121-231-014 NE 1 2,667.89$ -$ 2,667.89$ 424 E MILL ST SCHOOL MILL INVESTORS LLC 3936 121-234-034 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 503 E MAIN ST MARQUEZ SERGIO 1 3936 121-234-070 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 510 E CHAPEL ST ROJAS ISMAEL 3936 121-250-016 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1041 E MAIN ST MAIN 101 PARTNERS 3936 121-380-016 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1448 N BRADLEY RD MACIAS JAIME 3936 121-380-017 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1444 N BRADLEY RD CABALITASAN AGNES 3936 121-380-018 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1440 N BRADLEY RD PORCHO BLANCA E 3936 121-380-019 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1436 N BRADLEY RD CHAVEZ ALBERTO G/ELIZABETH H 3936 121-380-020 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1432 N BRADLEY RD MOHR DELMA MARIA LIVING TRUST 08/06/10 3936 121-380-021 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1428 N BRADLEY RD DAZO ANGEL D SR 3936 121-380-022 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1424 N BRADLEY RD RUVALCABA GUADALUPE 3936 121-380-023 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1420 N BRADLEY RD LEON JAQUELINE SANTIAGO 3936 121-380-024 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1416 N BRADLEY RD LOPEZ JORGE PANTOJA 3936 121-380-025 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1412 N BRADLEY RD ZENDEJAS FILIBERTO/EUSTOLIA 3936 121-380-026 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 866 HARPER CT ZEPEDA ALFONSO & YOLANDA REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST 11/1
3936 121-380-027 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 862 HARPER CT CHRISMAN FAMILY TRUST 4/10/02 3936 121-380-028 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 858 HARPER CT RAMIREZ OFELIA 3936 121-380-029 NE 1 592.87$ -$ 592.87$ 854 HARPER CT GARCIA VICTOR AREVALO
3936 121-380-030 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 850 HARPER CT JOHNSON DALE/DEBORAH FAMILY TRUST 5/17/19
3936 121-380-031 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 838 HARPER CT CABANDONG ARMANDO P 3936 121-380-032 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 834 HARPER CT TORRES RAYMOND JAKE CASTILLO 3936 121-380-033 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 830 HARPER CT STEVENS RICHARD J/FRANCES A 3936 121-380-034 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 826 HARPER CT SOLIS JOSE ISABEL ISAAC 3936 121-380-035 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 822 HARPER CT TRUJILLO JOSE AVILA 3936 121-380-036 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 818 HARPER CT VALENZUELA RAYMOND 3936 121-380-037 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 814 HARPER CT PALLAN DELIA C LIVING TRUST 10/30/2002 3936 121-380-038 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 810 HARPER CT TANYAG PAZ V 3936 121-380-039 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 806 HARPER CT HERRERA GLORIA A 3936 121-380-040 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 802 HARPER CT LARA CARLOS 3936 121-380-042 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 817 HARPER CT GORE REVOCABLE 2005 TRUST 3936 121-380-043 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 821 HARPER CT CARBALLO MARIA E 3936 121-380-044 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 825 HARPER CT GARDNER TIMOTHY C 3936 121-380-045 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 829 HARPER CT ORTIZ JOHN G 3936 121-380-046 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 833 HARPER CT LEON FELIPE 3936 121-380-047 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 837 HARPER CT HAAS JOINT LIVING TRUST 1/20/06 3936 121-380-048 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 839 HARPER CT PATTERSON VIVIENNE T TRUST 3/21/13 3936 121-380-049 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 841 HARPER CT MICHAELIS JAMES/DENISE 3936 121-380-050 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 845 HARPER CT SLOAN EDWINA YVONNE 3936 121-380-051 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 847 HARPER CT TESORO CONSUELO 3936 121-380-052 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 849 HARPER CT HURTADO ALFREDO P/MARIA A ESPINOZA 3936 121-380-053 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 853 HARPER CT FREDEEN FAMILY LIVING TRUST 1/16/08 3936 121-380-054 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 855 HARPER CT JUAREZ ELENA ELIZABETH 3936 121-380-055 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 859 HARPER CT REMOLACIO FAMILY TRUST 3936 121-380-056 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 863 HARPER CT CONTRERAS JOSE & MARICELA FAMILY TRUST 3936 121-380-057 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 867 HARPER CT SANCHEZ JOSUE ARIAS 3936 121-380-063 NE 1 2,371.46$ -$ 2,371.46$ 1400 N BRADLEY RD A BRADLEY ROAD APARTMENTS LLC 3936 125-031-026 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 408 E MAIN ST H & R SANTA BARBARA INVESTMENTS LLC 3936 125-035-022 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 700 E MAIN ST OLIVERA PROPERTIES LLC 3936 125-035-024 NE 1 1,466.61$ -$ 1,466.61$ 624 E MAIN ST PORTER CHARLES 3936 125-041-023 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 722 E MAIN ST OLIVERA PROPERTIES LLC 3936 125-044-006 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 120 S COLLEGE DR NAUMESCU ION & DANIELA TRUST 4/7/17 3936 125-051-008 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 940 E MAIN ST VU QUAN ANH 3936 125-101-011 NE 1 7,354.30$ -$ 7,354.30$ 504 S BROADWAY MALHOTRA 2006 TRUST 8/7/06 3936 125-111-002 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 400 E ORANGE ST CLAYTON FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 11/20/20 3936 125-112-010 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 417 E BOONE ST ZAKOUR RAMI 3936 125-112-011 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 417 E BOONE ST ZAKOUR RAMI 3936 125-112-014 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ ZAKOUR RAMI 3936 125-114-015 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 501 E BOONE ST ZAKOUR RAMI E 3936 125-141-015 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 122 E BOONE ST BOONE STREET LLC 3936 125-200-034 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 931 E STOWELL RD DUDLEY MORTUARY 3936 125-200-042 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1210 S BRADLEY RD MORETTI VERA C 3936 125-200-045 NE 1 80,629.71$ -$ 80,629.71$ 530 E BOONE ST HT PARTNERS LP 3936 125-232-005 NE 1 11,857.31$ -$ 11,857.31$ 665 SIERRA MADRE AVE SIERRA MADRE COTTAGES L P 3936 125-232-006 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 624 E CAMINO COLEGIO BETHEL LUTHERAN CHURCH
3936 125-251-038 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1226 S BROADWAY HALLE PROPERTIES LLC 3936 128-002-043 NE 1 993.19$ -$ 993.19$ SANTA MARIA-BONITA SCHOOL DISTRICT 3936 128-002-047 NE 1 993.19$ -$ 993.19$ 1921 CARLOTTI DR SANTA MARIA-BONITA SCHOOL DISTRICT 3936 128-003-008 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ POBOX 7640 ESTRADA GILBERTO 3936 128-003-014 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ ROEMER PERKCO REAL ESTATE 3936 128-003-015 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 307 ROEMER WAY A HADY LLC 3936 128-003-019 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1945 ROEMER PL DL CHAVEZ PROPERTIES LLC 3936 128-003-029 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 210 ROEMER WAY ROBERT & SHARON ROEMER FAMILY LLC 3936 128-003-030 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 240 ROEMER WAY SMOOTH 3936 128-003-034 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1920 PREISKER LN ISTORAGE PO LLC 3936 128-003-036 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1920 PREISKER LN ISTORAGE PO LLC 3936 128-003-042 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ ROEMER ISTORAGE PO LLC 3936 128-003-047 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ ANAND ENTERPRISES LP 3936 128-003-048 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ ANAND ENTERPRISES LP 3936 128-003-052 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 2079 ROEMER CT BAPA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 3936 128-003-053 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 2061 ROEMER CT BAPA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 3936 128-004-003 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 112 E GRANT ST PEREZ YOLANDA 3936 128-004-013 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1760 N BROADWAY CVP - SANTA MARIA DB LLC 3936 128-018-074 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 739 E DONOVAN RD SLO GAS & MART INC 3936 128-019-021 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ G 3 ENTERPRISES INC 3936 128-019-032 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1740 CARLOTTI DR HIGGINS DOUGLAS A 3936 128-027-050 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1230 E DONOVAN RD KUHNLE ADRIANA B 3936 128-033-036 NE Suey and Donovan 1 4,307.35$ 4,279.84$ 8,954.03$ 1220 SUEY RD MG AT SANTA MARIA LP 3936 128-033-039 NE Suey and Donovan 1 4,307.35$ 4,279.84$ 8,954.03$ 1350 SUEY RD MG AT SANTA MARIA LP 3936 128-039-056 NE 1 592.87$ -$ 592.87$ 1465 ASH AVE ASH AVENUE VENTURE LLC 3936 128-039-057 NE 1 592.87$ -$ 592.87$ 1485 ASH AVE ASH AVENUE VENTURE LLC 3936 128-039-058 NE 1 592.87$ -$ 592.87$ 1505 ASH AVE ASH AVENUE VENTURE LLC 3936 128-052-014 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1571 E MAIN ST IBSEN FAM TR 7-1-75 3936 128-052-023 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ IBSEN FAM TR 7/1/74 3936 128-055-040 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1529 MONICA CT MCDOWELL FAMILY TRUST 4/18/95 3936 128-055-041 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1515 MONICA CT MEZA ALEJANDRA 3936 128-055-042 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1509 MONICA CT ROBLEDO ROBERT A 3936 128-055-043 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1508 MONICA CT CASTRO ERICA 3936 128-055-044 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1516 MONICA CT CASTRO ERICA 3936 128-055-045 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1524 MONICA CT JOHNSON ERIC R EXEMPTION TRUST 4/20/06 3936 128-055-046 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1532 MONICA CT BURNS ANN BETTY 3936 128-055-047 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1540 MONICA CT LEE ROBERT R 3936 128-055-048 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 202 BRIAN ST SANCHEZ IRMA 3936 128-055-049 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 210 BRIAN ST LEE ROBERT R 3936 128-055-050 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 218 BRIAN ST HERNANDEZ FELIPE A 3936 128-055-053 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1503 E MAIN ST C & P INVESTMENT COMPANY 3936 128-056-030 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1510 E MAIN ST 101 SLS MAIN LLC 3936 128-056-032 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1550 E MAIN ST SANTA MARIA VA LLC 3936 128-109-001 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1639 PREMIER CT MARTINEZ LOURDES REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST 3/31/2014
3936 128-109-002 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1645 PREMIER CT WILLIAMS VERA M TRUSTEE 3936 128-109-003 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1651 PREMIER CT PATTON JAMES C/SANDRA
3936 128-109-004 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1657 PREMIER CT BECK JAMES C 3936 128-109-005 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1663 PREMIER CT COTA FREDERICK R JR 3936 128-109-006 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1669 PREMIER CT AMBA FAMILY TRUST 7/24/18 3936 128-109-007 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1675 PREMIER CT KILLPACK 2001 LIVING TRUST 7/20/2001 3936 128-109-008 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1695 E ALVIN AVE NODLEW INC 3936 128-109-009 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1699 E ALVIN AVE FABIAN DONALD LEE/PAULINE GAY 3936 128-109-010 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1686 PREMIER CT GARCIA KEITH/NANCY 3936 128-109-011 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1682 PREMIER CT SCOTT ELLEN F H SEPARATE PROPERTY TRUST 2/5/20
3936 128-109-012 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1678 PREMIER CT HIN JOSE L/OLGA L 3936 128-109-013 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1674 PREMIER CT ORTEGA FAMILY TRUST 2/3/04 3936 128-109-014 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1668 PREMIER CT ALCANTARA COSME V JR 3936 128-109-015 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1662 PREMIER CT PEDROCHE THELMA 3936 128-109-016 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1652 PREMIER CT MIZOGUCHI YOSHIO/SANDY K 3936 128-109-017 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1646 PREMIER CT WELDON DICK/MARILYN TRUST 6/30/14 3936 128-109-018 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1640 PREMIER CT PEREZ GUILLERMO/MARIA GUADALUPE 3936 128-109-024 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1602 ROWLAND DR MERIDITH ARACELI 3936 128-109-025 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1610 ROWLAND DR JORDAN 2011 FAMILY TRUST 06/24/2011 3936 128-109-026 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1616 ROWLAND DR BRAUCHER JONATHAN PAUL/AMELIA EARLENE 3936 128-109-027 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1622 ROWLAND DR PLUARD FRED D III/JOYCE G TRUSTEES 3936 128-109-033 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1628 ROWLAND DR THORNHILL ROGER 3936 128-109-034 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1634 ROWLAND DR LOOYSEN CHRIS 3936 128-109-035 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1638 ROWLAND DR GARCIA MIGUEL O 3936 128-109-036 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1644 ROWLAND DR JORDAN 2011 FAMILY TRUST 6/24/11 3936 128-109-037 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1650 ROWLAND DR NICODEMUS RENEA 3936 128-109-038 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1656 ROWLAND DR HOLLOWAY BETTY JUNE 2014 REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 3/25
3936 128-109-039 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1662 ROWLAND DR CUEVAS MACARIO/CHARITA 3936 128-109-040 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1670 ROWLAND DR SALGUERO MORIS HUMBERTO RECINOS 3936 128-109-041 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1676 ROWLAND DR MARIN RITA 3936 128-109-042 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 310 SPRUCE DR CHAVEZ JESUS 3936 128-109-043 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1687 ROWLAND DR REYNANTE LIV REV TR 10-6-93 3936 128-109-044 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1683 ROWLAND DR LIMON MARIO/STACEY 3936 128-109-045 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1677 ROWLAND DR MOXLEY GERALD E 3936 128-109-046 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1671 ROWLAND DR MORRIS MICHAEL D 3936 128-109-047 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1661 ROWLAND DR FARIAS JORGE A 3936 128-109-048 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1651 ROWLAND DR RODRIGUEZ FABIAN JOSEPH 3936 128-109-049 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1643 ROWLAND DR WINTERS ANITA TRUST 10/22/17 3936 128-109-050 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1637 ROWLAND DR YOUNGBLOOD RANDALL W 3936 128-109-051 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1633 ROWLAND DR GOMEZ JACOB 3936 128-109-052 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1625 ROWLAND DR ROBERTS DEAN EDWARD 3936 128-109-055 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1619 ROWLAND DR ESPARZA ELIA 3936 128-110-001 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1803 MAGELLAN DR CLYATT FAMILY TRUST 12/5/13 3936 128-110-002 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1807 MAGELLAN DR SAUCEDO JOSEPH RICHARD 3936 128-110-003 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1811 MAGELLAN DR GARCIA RODOLFO R 3936 128-110-004 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1815 MAGELLAN DR GAMBOA MARIA CARMEN 3936 128-110-005 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1821 MAGELLAN DR MEYERS NANCY J TRUSTEE
3936 128-110-006 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1825 MAGELLAN DR PEREZ MANUEL MORALES 3936 128-110-007 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1831 MAGELLAN DR BARRIOS ROBERT B/KRISTIE I 3936 128-110-008 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1835 MAGELLAN DR CONTRERAS BLANCA D 3936 128-110-009 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1066 SEAWARD DR RAMOS DANIEL SR 3936 128-110-010 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1841 N MAGELLEN DR BOYDSTUN TOM JR/KRISTINA E 3936 128-110-011 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1070 SEAWARD DR KLEIN TODD EMORY 3936 128-110-012 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1106 SEAWARD DR SHAFFER GAROLD/JONI 3936 128-110-013 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1836 MAGELLAN DR CAMPBELL FAMILY TRUST 5/10/02 3936 128-110-014 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1830 MAGELLAN DR OCHOA JORGE A 3936 128-110-015 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1105 RACHEL DR SAINZ ANNA M 3936 128-110-016 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1110 SEAWARD DR CUSHING KERIC J 3936 128-110-017 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1114 SEAWARD DR LOPEZ RAYMOND JR/DIANA 3936 128-110-018 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1118 SEAWARD DR MERINO STEVE ROBERT 3936 128-110-019 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1122 SEAWARD DR BIGGER MARLENE B LIVING TRUST 10/27/05 3936 128-110-020 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1202 SEAWARD DR FAUSTO CESAR SAMUEL RAMOS 3936 128-110-021 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1206 SEAWARD DR ZARAGOZA DAMON/NANCY 3936 128-110-022 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1210 SEAWARD DR DIAZ JOSEPH GILBERT III 3936 128-110-023 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1214 SEAWARD DR DIAZ VICTOR M CEJA 3936 128-110-024 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1220 SEAWARD DR JACKSON MICHAEL PATRICK/MARGARITA 3936 128-110-025 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1205 KATHRYN WAY ZARATE FAMILY TRUST 3/8/19 3936 128-110-026 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1127 RACHEL DR SILVA LOUISE V 3936 128-110-027 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1125 RACHEL DR DUNN RONALD S/COLLEEN J 3936 128-110-028 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1123 RACHEL DR RODRIGUEZ ANGELICA 3936 128-110-029 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1119 RACHEL DR FLORES ALBERT 3936 128-110-030 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1115 RACHEL DR GREER JOHN WILLIAM JR 3936 128-110-031 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1111 RACHEL DR JONES JOSEPH D/ERMA J 3936 128-110-032 NE 1 592.87$ -$ 592.87$ 1106 RACHEL DR MALDONADO ARNULFO 3936 128-110-033 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1112 RACHEL DR ROMAN TERRANCE G 3936 128-110-034 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1118 RACHEL DR GARCIA RAYMOND M 3936 128-110-035 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1124 RACHEL DR VIRGEN OFELIA 3936 128-110-036 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1125 KATHRYN WAY GONZALEZ ALEX 3936 128-110-037 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1119 KATHRYN WAY CARRILLO CHRISTOPHER O 3936 128-110-038 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1115 KATHRYN WAY TOVAAS FAMILY TRUST 6/25/09 3936 128-110-039 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1808 MAGELLAN DR RIVERA JESUS 3936 128-110-040 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1804 MAGELLAN DR MCCLURE SUSAN REVOCABLE TRUST 4/3/15 3936 128-110-041 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1104 KATHRYN WAY WARD CATHERINE R 3936 128-110-042 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1110 KATHRYN WAY MCDOWELL DAVID L 3936 128-110-043 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1116 KATHRYN WAY BORGES CHRISTOPHER SEAN 3936 128-110-044 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1120 KATHRYN WAY RODRIGUEZ JORGE BARAJAS 3936 128-110-045 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1126 KATHRYN WAY FERGUSON DARIN/GINA REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST 1/2/14
3936 128-110-046 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1130 KATHRYN WAY KLEIN TODD 3936 128-110-047 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1204 KATHRYN WAY BROOKS CASSIE L 3936 128-110-048 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1210 KATHRYN WAY SERVIN MARIA CORTEZ 3936 128-110-049 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1214 KATHRYN WAY KOU SHAY MIN 3936 128-110-050 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1220 KATHRYN WAY SHEEHAN JOHN J
3936 128-111-001 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1736 BAYVIEW DR BECERRA WILLIE BONNET SR LIVING TRUST 3/9/00
3936 128-111-002 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1740 BAYVIEW DR MCARDLE GLENN T 3936 128-111-003 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1802 BAYVIEW DR DAILEY MARK C 3936 128-111-004 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1806 BAYVIEW AVE DIAZ JOSEPH G/DONNA A 3936 128-111-005 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1810 BAYVIEW AVE DIAZ MARIA FAMILY TRUST 3936 128-111-006 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1238 SEAWARD DR CRAWFORD LARRY E/REBECCA A CAREY 3936 128-111-007 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1807 TANYA CT IKAHEIMO FAMILY TRUST 3936 128-111-008 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1803 TANYA CT CASON FRANK & OFELIA FAMILY TRUST 10/2/15 3936 128-111-009 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1802 TANYA CT ALEJANDRE CARMEN V 3936 128-111-010 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1806 TANYA CT MARTINEZ AGUSTIN 3936 128-111-011 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1810 TANYA CT FREEDOM CRUSADE A CALIFORNIA NON-
PROFIT CORP
3936 128-111-012 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1310 SEAWARD DR RECCORD CYNTHIA 3936 128-111-013 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1314 SEAWARD DR BRIGHT JOHN CHRISTOPHER 3936 128-111-014 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1320 SEAWARD DR PUSSER AARON B 3936 128-120-012 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1406 E MAIN ST DIGNITY HEALTH 3936 128-120-013 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1410 E MAIN ST DIGNITY HEALTH 3936 128-120-018 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1400 E CHURCH ST DIGNITY HEALTH 3936 128-120-029 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1418 E MAIN ST SHEPARD FAMILY SURVIVORS TRUST 12/7/83 3936 128-120-032 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1325 E CHURCH ST MHCC LLC 3936 128-120-033 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1310 E MAIN ST DIGNITY HEALTH 3936 128-122-001 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1602 SUEY RD ANGULO GILBERTO/ISABEL 3936 128-122-002 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1606 SUEY RD CUELLAR MARICELA LARIZ 3936 128-122-003 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1610 SUEY RD BONGE EDWARD M JR 3936 128-122-004 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1614 SUEY RD PACHECO FLORENTINA REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST 9/11/18
3936 128-122-005 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1618 SUEY RD TOVAR JOSE 3936 128-122-006 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1622 SUEY RD BALL RANDAL G/ELIZABETH E 3936 128-122-007 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1626 SUEY RD SCHNEIDER JAMES C 3936 128-122-008 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1630 SUEY RD GUZMAN JESUS VALLE 3936 128-122-009 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1634 SUEY RD BERNAL ARMANDO 3936 128-122-010 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1638 SUEY RD DEGUZMAN BANAAG & AURORA A REVOCABLE TRUST 12/17/70
3936 128-122-011 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1642 SUEY RD CLABORN ROBERT J 3936 128-122-012 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1639 VENETTE LN ROBLES JESSICA NOEMI 3936 128-122-013 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1635 VENETTE LN ENRIQUEZ ARTURO 3936 128-122-014 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1631 VENETTE LN GUERRERO ANTHONY 3936 128-122-015 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1627 VENETTE LN GARCIA DAVID 3936 128-122-016 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1623 N VENETTA LN ZDUN DONALD T 3936 128-122-017 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1619 VENETTE LN MONDOL ALEJANDRO 3936 128-122-018 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1615 VENETTE LN FRANCE ERIC D 3936 128-122-019 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1611 VENETTE LN PETERS VERN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 6/12/15
3936 128-122-020 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1607 VENETTE LN QUINTANA PATRICK J 3936 128-122-021 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1603 VENETTE LN HIDALGO ANTHONY M 3936 128-122-022 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1604 CAT LN BORGES MARGARIDA R LIVING TRUST 4/20/15
3936 128-122-023 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1608 CAT LN RIVERA MARTIN/CHRISTINE 3936 128-122-024 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1612 CAT LN SALAZAR RICK R 3936 128-122-025 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1616 CAT LN REYES ROSALIA 3936 128-122-026 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1620 CAT LN JOHNSON SUZANNE M TRUSTEE 3936 128-122-027 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1624 CAT LN SILVEIRA JOHN M 3936 128-122-028 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1628 CAT LN YOSHIHARA LORENE C INDIVIDUAL LIVING TRUST
3936 128-122-029 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1630 CAT LN HORNIAK LEONARD J 3936 128-122-030 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1634 CAT LN PURDY JOE 3936 128-122-031 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1638 CAT LN SKINNER BRIAN 3936 128-122-032 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1642 CAT LN HARTMAN GRETCHEN E TRUST 7/1/16 3936 128-122-033 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1646 CAT LN LEGASPI LUIS F & ANA GABRIELA REVOCABLE
FAMILY TRUST
3936 128-122-034 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1636 VENETTE LN PINEDA HECTOR A 3936 128-122-035 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1632 VENETTE LN SUAREZ MIGUEL A 3936 128-122-036 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1626 VENETTE LN BELL CODY LEE 3936 128-122-037 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1622 VENETTE LN SMITH CHRIS 3936 128-122-038 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1618 VENETTE LN MONTOYA TOMAS O 3936 128-122-039 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1614 VENETTE LN CASILLAS ALEJANDRO G 3936 128-122-040 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1610 VENETTE LN HERNANDEZ JOSEFINA MORENO 3936 128-122-041 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1629 CAT LN VASQUEZ JOSE L 3936 128-122-042 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1635 CAT LN PINEDA JORGE PADILLA 3936 128-122-043 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1639 CAT LN SWEETWATER FAMILY TRUST 3936 128-122-044 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1643 CAT LN VAN VORT TERESA 3936 128-122-045 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1647 CAT LN GARIBAY VICKY 3936 128-122-046 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1651 CAT LN DURAN ROBERT 3936 128-122-047 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1627 CHARLIE LN SHIFFER CHARITY H 3936 128-122-048 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1621 CHARLIE LN CASTRO LAWRENCE F FAMILY TRUST 11/28/12 3936 128-122-049 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1619 CHARLIE LN YOUNG FAMILY TRUST 03/06/2012 3936 128-122-050 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1615 CHARLIE LN HERRERA FRANCES E 3936 128-122-051 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1609 CHARLIE LN ACEVEDO JOSE R 3936 128-122-052 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1605 CHARLIE LN FRAIRE RACHELLE M 3936 128-122-053 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1650 FLOYD CT ADAM LACEY S REVOCABLE TRUST 3936 128-122-054 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1654 FLOYD CT HOCHHOLZER MARGIE J REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
3936 128-122-055 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1660 FLOYD CT FUERSTENBERG DALE J 3936 128-122-057 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1667 FLOYD CT CORTEZ FAMILY TRUST 12/17/18 3936 128-122-058 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1665 FLOYD CT SANCHEZ NOE 3936 128-122-059 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1663 FLOYD CT BETZ DAVID W 3936 128-122-060 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1659 FLOYD CT REQUEJO CHRISTOPHER 3936 128-122-061 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1657 FLOYD CT OJEDA RAUL 3936 128-122-062 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1655 FLOYD CT MORGAN RICHARD 3936 128-122-063 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1618 CHARLIE LN GOMEZ JAMES 3936 128-122-064 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1622 CHARLIE LN ZEPEDA DENA 3936 128-122-065 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1626 CHARLIE LN MURRAY TOM & CAMMIE REVOCABLE TRUST 3/25/20
3936 128-127-002 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1430 N MT WHITNEY WAYCARDOZA FRANKLIN BERT II
3936 128-127-003 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1422 N MT WHITNEY WAYHERNANDEZ EVARISTO MACIAS 3936 128-127-004 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1414 N MT WHITNEY WAYWILHITE ALLEN DEWAYNE 3936 128-127-005 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1406 N MT WHITNEY WAYMARSHALL FAMILY TRUST 12/10/07 3936 128-127-006 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1340 N MT WHITNEY WAYGUTIERREZ REGINA A 3936 128-127-007 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1334 N MT WHITNEY WAYCAMPBELL BARBARA A 2008 REVOCABLE
FAMILY TRUST
3936 128-127-008 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1328 N MT WHITNEY WAYJOHNSON MARILYN 3936 128-127-010 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1330 SUTTER ST BONDIETTI WAYNE R/HOLLY D 3936 128-127-011 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1318 SUTTER ST CRONOMIZ VIRGINIA M 3936 128-127-012 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1308 SUTTER ST EAKER SCOTT 3936 128-127-013 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1238 SUTTER ST LOERA GUILLERMO SR 3936 128-127-014 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1230 SUTTER ST RIVERA NICK A/DAISY B 3936 128-127-015 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1225 SUTTER ST VILLAVICENCIO ALEJANDRO 3936 128-127-016 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1233 SUTTER ST SAHAGUN SALVADOR R JR/JULISA 3936 128-127-017 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1239 SUTTER ST DE LA PAZ ERICA 3936 128-127-018 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1307 SUTTER ST RAMOSNORIZ FRANCISCO 3936 128-127-019 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1317 SUTTER ST CORONA JOSE MANUEL 3936 128-127-020 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1327 SUTTER ST RAMIREZ ANGELES 3936 128-127-021 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1415 N MT WHITNEY WAYLLAGAS DANILO R/LENIE R 3936 128-127-022 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1423 N MT WHITNEY WAYTELLO GILBERT 3936 128-127-023 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1431 N MT WHITNEY WAYHERNANDEZ JAIME 3936 128-130-001 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1217 SUTTER ST PAZ GILBERTO TELLO 3936 128-130-002 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1209 SUTTER ST BRANDES PATRICIA H LIVING TRUST 3936 128-130-003 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1139 SUTTER ST SADDI FAMILY TRUST 8/26/09 3936 128-130-004 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1131 SUTTER ST RUVALCABA RAYMUNDO 3936 128-130-005 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1123 SUTTER ST MORRIS GLENN D 3936 128-130-006 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1115 SUTTER ST IVEMEYER GREGG A SEPARATE PROPERTY TRUST 5/23/15
3936 128-130-007 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1107 SUTTER ST HIGUERA SEVIM REVOCABLE TRUST 09/12/2013 3936 128-130-008 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1718 WINCHESTER WAY ALCANTAR JUAN ANSELMO/MERCEDES LORENA 3936 128-130-009 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1720 WINCHESTER WAY ALCANTAR EMMANUEL 3936 128-130-010 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1722 WINCHESTER WAY BARBEY MICHAEL 3936 128-130-011 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1724 WINCHESTER WAY TING PETER YIK-GUANG/ESTHER DUAN-ANG 3936 128-130-012 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1726 WINCHESTER WAY MOGG CHERYL LEIGH 3936 128-130-013 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1725 WINCHESTER WAY KOCH WILLIAM R & BARBARA REVOCABLE
FAMILY TRUST
3936 128-130-014 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1114 SUTTER ST LARA JACK ANTHONY III 3936 128-130-015 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1122 SUTTER ST LEON ADELAIDA JIMENEZ 3936 128-130-016 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1130 SUTTER ST PINEDA JERRY REVOCABLE TRUST 3/25/14 3936 128-130-017 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1138 SUTTER ST FAOUR IHSSAN G 3936 128-130-018 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1208 SUTTER ST VARGAS EDWARD B 3936 128-130-019 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1216 SUTTER ST FERNANDEZ MEDRADO C 3936 128-130-020 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1222 SUTTER ST DOMINGUEZ JAIME A 3936 128-130-021 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1316 N MT WHITNEY WAYYI MYONG/NAM 3936 128-130-022 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1310 N MT WHITNEY WAYLEMMEX STEPHANIE 3936 128-130-023 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1304 N MT WHITNEY WAYLYONS JOSEPH F/JANICE M 3936 128-130-024 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1240 N MT WHITNEY WAYPUENTE PATRICIA
3936 128-130-025 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1234 N MT WHITNEY WAYPERALTA MONCERRATT BERTHA 3936 128-130-026 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1228 N MT WHITNEY WAYGOODNIGHT HARRY T 3936 128-130-027 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1223 N MT WHITNEY WAYVEA EDMUND M/DELAILAH C 3936 128-130-028 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1214 GRASS VALLEY WAYPEREZ HECTOR ARROYO 3936 128-130-029 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1206 GRASS VALLEY WAYBURKET ANGEL 3936 128-130-030 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1136 GRASS VALLEY WAYEBNER FAMILY TRUST 3936 128-130-031 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1128 GRASS VALLEY WAYCAMPOS RAYMOND G 3936 128-130-032 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1124 GRASS VALLEY WAYCHAPARRO JOSEPH 3936 128-130-033 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1116 GRASS VALLEY WAYGG COASTAL INVESTMENTS LLC 3936 128-130-034 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1737 WINCHESTER WAY RIVERA JOSE MANUEL POMPA 3936 128-130-035 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1738 WINCHESTER WAY MILLER ROBERT J 3936 128-130-036 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1736 WINCHESTER WAY CASEY KILEY J 3936 128-130-037 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1734 WINCHESTER WAY CHILDRESS ROSALIE G 3936 128-130-038 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1732 WINCHESTER WAY ALCANTAR ALBERTO 3936 128-130-039 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1730 WINCHESTER WAY NANALIS RACHEL DOMANTAY 3936 128-130-040 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1728 WINCHESTER WAY TOMKINS DANIEL R 3936 128-130-041 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1729 WINCHESTER WAY MALDONADO EMILIO G JR 3936 128-130-042 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1117 GRASS VALLEY WAYVAZQUEZ BLANCA E 3936 128-130-043 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1125 GRASS VALLEY WAYHERRERA HERNAN 3936 128-130-044 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1133 GRASS VALLEY WAYNEGRETE VICTOR M 3936 128-130-045 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1137 GRASS VALLEY WAYHERNANDEZ GARCIA JUAN R 3936 128-130-046 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1207 GRASS VALLEY WAYLUEPKE JACKSON E 3936 128-130-047 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1215 GRASS VALLEY WAYCARLS KEITH V 3936 128-130-048 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1223 GRASS VALLEY WAYYSIP EDUARDO G 3936 128-130-049 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1231 GRASS VALLEY WAYFUHRIMAN JOHN T 3936 128-130-050 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1311 N MT WHITNEY WAYMELCHOR ALFREDO 3936 128-130-051 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1740 WINCHESTER WAY ROSAS MANUEL 3936 128-130-052 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1742 WINCHESTER WAY SOLANO ROGUER 3936 128-130-053 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1744 WINCHESTER WAY STERBONIC VALERIE 3936 128-130-054 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1746 WINCHESTER WAY GARCELLANO CELLY B 3936 128-130-055 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1748 WINCHESTER WAY ARCHULETA STEVEN 3936 128-130-056 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1750 WINCHESTER WAY LABASTIDA RODGS A 3936 128-130-057 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1752 WINCHESTER WAY SALAS-VELASCO DANIEL 3936 128-130-058 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1751 WINCHESTER WAY JARAMILLO JOSE EFRAIN 3936 128-130-059 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1749 WINCHESTER WAY BRICKEY CHARLES J/KRISTINE L 3936 128-130-060 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1747 WINCHESTER WAY CHEN XIN QIANG 3936 128-130-061 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1106 N MT WHITNEY WAYHUITRON JOSE ANGEL A/RITA F REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 8
3936 128-130-062 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1122 N MT WHITNEY WAYSMITH THORA G INDIVIDUAL LIVING TRUST 12/21/15
3936 128-130-065 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1140 N MT WHITNEY WAYSIMONSON JACOB 3936 128-130-066 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1210 N MT WHITNEY WAYTORRES ROSA 2009 REVOCABLE TRUST 4/20/09 3936 128-130-067 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1216 N MT WHITNEY WAYHUTCHESON FAMILY TRUST 3936 128-130-068 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1222 N MT WHITNEY WAYQUESADA MARIA ESTHER 3936 128-130-069 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1205 N MT WHITNEY WAYMCCREERY SHANNON P 3936 128-130-070 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1135 N MT WHITNEY WAYHERNANDEZ REFUGIO 3936 128-130-071 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1129 N MT WHITNEY WAYROSAS GUADALUPE/DEBORAH K
3936 128-130-072 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1121 N MT WHITNEY WAYPITSCHMANN ALEX 3936 128-130-073 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1111 N MT WHITNEY WAYPELLAMOUNTER JAMES & LEANNA LIVING TRUST
3936 128-130-074 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1741 WINCHESTER WAY TRAGA LARISA 3936 128-130-076 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1136 N MT WHITNEY WAYCRUZ JEREMY 3936 128-130-077 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1130 N MT WHITNEY WAYCASTRO ADOLFO JR 3936 128-132-002 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1832 N BROADWAY NB PLAZA LLC 3936 128-132-004 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1822 N BROADWAY NB PLAZA LLC 3936 128-132-005 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1876 N BROADWAY NORTH BROADWAY PLAZA LP 3936 128-132-006 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1864 N BROADWAY WONG FAMILY INCOME TRUST 1/21/03 3936 128-132-007 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1846 N BROADWAY SOFIJON LLC 3936 128-132-008 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1816 N BROADWAY GARNER-SINTON INC 3936 128-132-009 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1870 N BROADWAY NB PLAZA LLC 3936 128-132-010 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ POBOX 847 NB PLAZA LLC 3936 128-132-011 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ 1830 N BROADWAY NEW ALBERTSONS INC 3936 128-132-012 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ POBOX 847 NB PLAZA LLC 3936 128-132-013 NE 1 733.30$ -$ 733.30$ POBOX 847 NB PLAZA LLC 3936 128-133-001 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 915 SENECA ST KROMER CYRIL/VICTORIA WEST 3936 128-133-002 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 921 SENECA ST PALACIOS ARTURO 3936 128-133-003 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 929 SENECA ST LAZARO RACHEL 3936 128-133-004 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1724 MAMMOTH DR MARKSCHEFFEL SUSAN AUF DER HEYDE TRUST DDT 9/23/96
3936 128-133-005 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1720 MAMMOTH DR WARDEN JESSE LEDESMA/REBECCA T 3936 128-133-006 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1716 MAMMOTH DR RODRIGUEZ CLEM 3936 128-133-007 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1712 MAMMOTH DR RODRIGUEZ ALAN M 3936 128-133-008 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1708 MAMMOTH DR FLORES MARC & ESPER FAMILY TRUST 5/8/2012 3936 128-133-009 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1704 MAMMOTH DR BUBECK GREGORY P 3936 128-133-010 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1705 MAMMOTH DR SMITH PHILLIP D/IRENE A 3936 128-133-011 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1711 MAMMOTH DR MENDOZA SYLVIA M 3936 128-133-012 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1717 MAMMOTH DR ROBINSON JAMES F & PEGGY J REVOCABLE
LIVING TRUST
3936 128-133-013 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1008 CENTENNIAL ST HUSETH CRAIG A 2010 REVOCABLE TRUST 10/22/10
3936 128-133-014 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1727 MAMMOTH DR LOPEZ MIRKO 3936 128-133-015 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 936 SENECA ST OANI KEITH CABELIZA 3936 128-133-016 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 930 SENECA ST WAGENER WILLIAM J 3936 128-133-017 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 924 SENECA ST RAMIREZ HECTOR 3936 128-133-018 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 918 SENECA ST HOWZE BOONCHAN L 3936 128-133-019 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 917 HEARST CT COTTON CYNTHIA 3936 128-133-020 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 923 HEARST CT HARRINGTON FAMILY TRUST 5/12/2009 3936 128-133-021 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 929 HEARST CT KRUSE CONNIE L 3936 128-133-022 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 935 HEARST CT PACHECO WILLIAM J & LEOLA M REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 1
3936 128-133-023 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 941 HEARST CT IONATA PAUL A/FRANCISCA N 3936 128-133-024 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 940 HEARST CT ABRIL JOHNNY E 3936 128-133-025 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 934 HEARST CT ALLAIN FAMILY TRUST 8/19/20 3936 128-133-026 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 928 HEARST CT MALTA JOSEPH F & BERNICE T TRUST 7/29/98
3936 128-133-027 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 922 HEARST CT AGUILAR JAVIER 3936 128-133-028 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 916 HEARST CT WOODIN DONALD E/ELAYNE 3936 128-133-029 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 915 DONNER CT COLLINS HAROLD/SHARON S 3936 128-133-030 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 921 DONNER CT HARBOR CARY D 3936 128-133-031 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 929 DONNER CT BLACKSHEAR RICKY A 3936 128-133-032 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 933 DONNER CT GONZALEZ DAVID 3936 128-133-033 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 939 DONNER CT SMITH MICHAEL 3936 128-133-034 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 938 DONNER CT DILLON FAMILY TRUST 9/30/08 3936 128-133-035 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 932 DONNER CT RAMOS ALICE S 3936 128-133-036 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 926 DONNER CT WEEKS BETTY ADELE TRUST 3936 128-133-037 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 920 DONNER CT CLARK FAMILY TRUST 8/7/08 3936 128-133-038 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 914 DONNER CT ORSINI PAMELA 2010 TRUST 3936 128-133-039 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1730 DOMINGUES ST MCCURDY CHARLES FREDERICK & EDITH TTEES
3936 128-133-040 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1734 DOMINGUES ST CASTILLO ALBINO 3936 128-133-041 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1738 DOMINGUES ST PIRKEY TRUST 9/26/18 3936 128-133-042 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1740 DOMINGUES ST GARATE ANTONIO 3936 128-133-043 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1742 DOMINGUES ST DAMATO ROSEMARY FAMILY TRUST 2/15/19 3936 128-133-044 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1746 DOMINGUES ST FERNANDEZ LEELA R 3936 128-133-045 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1750 DOMINGUES ST GUTIERREZ RAFAEL 3936 128-133-046 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1752 DOMINGUES ST GALVAN ADRIAN 3936 128-141-001 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 804 SENECA ST RIOS DANIEL S 3936 128-141-002 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 810 SENECA ST RIOS HAROLD 3936 128-141-003 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 816 SENECA ST MEDINA MANUEL A 3936 128-141-004 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 824 SENECA ST FRIAS ISAAC 3936 128-141-005 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 830 SENECA ST COLLINS JAMES 3936 128-141-006 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 836 SENECA ST SANTORI MARJORIE T TRUSTEE 3936 128-141-007 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 846 SENECA ST GUSS JEFFREY A FAMILY TRUST 3936 128-141-010 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1726 RIOS CT MORENO JOSE ENRIQUE 3936 128-141-011 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1722 RIOS CT AQUINO FIDENCIO 3936 128-141-012 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1718 RIOS CT ROBBINS FAMILY TRUST 1/16/09 3936 128-141-013 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1714 RIOS CT LOPEZ FAMILY TRUST 3936 128-141-014 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1710 RIOS CT ARLP REO IV LLC 3936 128-141-015 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1706 RIOS CT TAPIA DAVID G LIVING TRUST 2/9/96 3936 128-141-016 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1702 RIOS CT MORRISON FAMILY TRUST 10/24/96 3936 128-141-017 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1703 RIOS CT HAGENBUCH LEROY G 3936 128-141-018 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1707 RIOS CT CAMACHO SANTOS 3936 128-141-019 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1711 RIOS CT CUMMINS MARK EDWIN 3936 128-141-020 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1715 RIOS CT BELTRAN SALVADOR M 3936 128-141-021 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1719 RIOS CT LOMELI ERIC 3936 128-141-022 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1723 RIOS CT DIAZ JEFFREY & ANITA FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 4/3/18
3936 128-141-023 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1727 RIOS CT BREWER LOYD NEIL & JUDITH ARLENE 1989 FAMILY TRUST 1
3936 128-141-024 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1736 HORSEMAN CT BUTSON ROBERT H JR 3936 128-141-025 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1734 HORSEMAN CT TUZZIO TRINA L 3936 128-141-026 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1730 HORSEMAN CT ALLEN RENNIE ANNE
3936 128-141-027 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1728 HORSEMAN CT BEURY MICHAEL J 3936 128-141-028 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1724 HORSEMAN CT SPENCER JESSICA MAE 3936 128-141-029 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1720 HORSEMAN CT GAUNA MARIA E 3936 128-141-030 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1716 HORSEMAN CT BISHOP JULIA 3936 128-141-031 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1712 HORSEMAN CT WEIDER REV LIV TR 8-16-95 3936 128-141-032 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1708 HORSEMAN CT BENDELE FAMILY TRUST 7/19/17 3936 128-141-033 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1704 HORSEMAN CT KELLEY FAMILY TRUST 3/2/92 3936 128-141-034 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1702 HORSEMAN CT BRESHEARS FAMILY TRUST 3936 128-141-035 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1703 HORSEMAN CT DE HORTA JAVIER 3936 128-141-036 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1705 HORSEMAN CT RANDOLPH FAMILY TRUST 3936 128-141-037 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1709 HORSEMAN CT BENTLEY ROLAND JUSTIN & CLARISSA MARIE
LIVING TRUST
3936 128-141-038 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1711 HORSEMAN CT PONCE SALVADOR M 3936 128-141-039 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1729 HORSEMAN CT RAMIREZ MIGUEL PEREZ 3936 128-141-040 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 1733 HORSEMAN CT WOJCIECHOSKI FAMILY TRUST 3936 128-141-041 NE 1 296.43$ -$ 296.43$ 905 SENECA ST SANABRIA JUAN 3936 128-142-001 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1834 DUKE DR FUENTES JESUS ENMANUEL 3936 128-142-002 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1830 DUKE DR MURPHY FAMILY TRUST 3936 128-142-003 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1826 DUKE DR FLORES ALBERTO 3936 128-142-004 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1822 DUKE DR LAZARO ALEJANDRO ARELLANO 3936 128-142-005 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1818 DUKE DR SANCHEZ VICTOR ANTHONY 3936 128-142-006 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1814 DUKE DR DELAROSA BENEDICT 3936 128-142-007 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1810 DUKE DR GIRTY DANNY A 3936 128-142-008 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1806 DUKE DR RIOS SANDRA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 1/25/18
3936 128-142-009 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1802 DUKE DR PIPAN EDWARD E/LAURIE A REVOCABLE TRUST 12/15/15
3936 128-142-010 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1803 DUKE DR SUDIK FAMILY TRUST 2/27/16 3936 128-142-011 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1807 DUKE DR GARCIA MARY LOU REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 8/27/12
3936 128-142-012 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1811 DUKE DR ENRIQUEZ IVAN 3936 128-142-013 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1815 DUKE DR CONTRERAS RENTALS LLC 3936 128-142-014 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1819 DUKE DR CORREALE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 10/13/03 3936 128-142-015 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1823 DUKE DR LIGHT WILLIAM H 3936 128-142-016 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1827 DUKE DR MEDEL DENYS A 3936 128-142-017 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1831 DUKE DR DOLORES JUSTIN RAMELB 3936 128-142-018 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1835 DUKE DR RIVERA FELIPE 3936 128-142-019 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1837 DUKE DR DIYORIO JAMES H 3936 128-142-023 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1830 BAYLOR LN ALDAMA JORGE 3936 128-142-024 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1826 BAYLOR LN CAMPOS-TRINIDAD ERIKA PATRICIA 3936 128-142-025 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1822 BAYLOR LN MASTROPIERI FAMILY TRUST 1/21/08 3936 128-142-026 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1818 BAYLOR LN MENDOZA-VARGAS GERARDO 3936 128-142-027 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1814 BAYLOR LN ENRIQUEZ OCTAVIO 3936 128-142-028 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1810 BAYLOR LN LOPEZ SANTINO S & AMBRECHT-LOPEZ
SHERIRAE REVOCABLE
3936 128-142-029 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1806 BAYLOR LN VIVANCO JORGE C
3936 128-142-030 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1803 BERKELEY WAY YSIP DONATO G 3936 128-142-031 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1807 BERKELEY WAY DELGADO JOSE 3936 128-142-032 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1811 BERKELEY WAY BRUNICK MICHAEL F 3936 128-142-033 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1812 BERKELEY WAY AZEVEDO JULIAN GABRIEL 3936 128-142-034 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1808 BERKELEY WAY IRVING JOHNATHAN W 3936 128-142-035 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1817 BAYLOR LN AVELINO RAMIL 3936 128-142-036 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1821 BAYLOR LN FORCE MICHAEL R 3936 128-142-037 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1825 BAYLOR LN ZAVALA LEONEL MEDRANO 3936 128-142-038 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1829 BAYLOR LN ZIGA LUZ MARIA RAMIREZ 3936 128-142-039 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1833 BAYLOR LN GOMEZ VICTOR 3936 128-142-040 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1837 BAYLOR LN AREVALO ISIDRO 3936 128-142-041 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1841 BAYLOR LN NAUGLE GREGORY MARTIN 3936 128-142-042 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1845 BAYLOR LN ROSAS CARLOS 3936 128-142-044 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1842 BAYLOR LN GOMEZ SANDRA L 3936 128-142-047 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1838 BAYLOR LN MARTINEZ MATTHEW E 3936 128-142-048 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1834 BAYLOR LN MEDIANO ROY/YVETTE L 3936 128-143-001 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 592.87$ 478.72$ 1,112.62$ 916 PADEN ST LIMON GERARDO 3936 128-143-002 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1807 DAVID SANCHEZ CT ROBLES CAROL 3936 128-143-003 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1811 DAVID SANCHEZ CT LANGLEY MELODY J 3936 128-143-004 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1815 DAVID SANCHEZ CT RODRIGUEZ OCTAVIO 3936 128-143-005 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1817 DAVID SANCHEZ CT LEON RODRIGO 3936 128-143-006 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1821 DAVID SANCHEZ CT JOHNSON TOBE 3936 128-143-007 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1825 DAVID SANCHEZ CT GOMEZ DE TORRES ANA M 3936 128-143-008 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1829 DAVID SANCHEZ CT HALL JEFFREY G 3936 128-143-009 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1831 DAVID SANCHEZ CT LEAL COSME GUTIERREZ 3936 128-143-010 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1835 DAVID SANCHEZ CT TREINEN JON S 3936 128-143-011 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1832 DAVID SANCHEZ CT VANHEST PETRUS AUGUSTINUS ANTONIUS MARIA
3936 128-143-012 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1828 DAVID SANCHEZ CT AVILA EVA 3936 128-143-013 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1824 DAVID SANCHEZ CT BLASCHKE JAMES A 3936 128-143-014 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1820 DAVID SANCHEZ CT ABAYON VICENTE L JR 3936 128-143-015 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1816 DAVID SANCHEZ CT GOMEZ LAURIE S 3936 128-143-016 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1814 DAVID SANCHEZ CT JALOMA JOSE S 3936 128-143-017 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1810 DAVID SANCHEZ CT MOLINA LENNY E 3936 128-143-018 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1806 DAVID SANCHEZ CT LARA MARIO E 3936 128-143-019 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1802 DAVID SANCHEZ CT LUCERO CAROLYN LOUISE 3936 128-143-020 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1803 DANIJAY WAY CARPENTER DONALD & IRENE FAMILY TRUST 12/29/17
3936 128-143-021 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1807 DANIJAY WAY KELLEY VINCENT & BRENDA FAMILY TRUST 6/9/20
3936 128-143-022 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1811 DANIJAY WAY SARMENTO ELDAR & EMA FAMILY TRUST 3936 128-143-023 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1815 DANIJAY WAY FONSECA JUAN M JR 3936 128-143-024 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1817 DANIJAY WAY MARSALEK ANDREW C 3936 128-143-025 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1821 DANIJAY WAY REYES FIDEL GOMEZ 3936 128-143-026 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1825 DANIJAY WAY FIDEL VIRGIL S 3936 128-143-027 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1829 DANIJAY WAY WILBURN TRUST 11/28/00 3936 128-143-028 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1824 DANIJAY WAY LLAMAS JAIME D
3936 128-143-029 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1820 DANIJAY WAY PEREZ SERGIO MAGANA 3936 128-143-030 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1816 DANIJAY WAY ISHAM DAVID JAMES 3936 128-143-031 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1814 DANIJAY WAY DODD SYLVIA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 3/6/02 3936 128-143-032 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1810 DANIJAY WAY LUCIER 2008 FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 4/29/08
3936 128-143-033 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1806 DANIJAY WAY TOOR MANPREET KAUR 3936 128-143-034 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1802 DANIJAY WAY NELSON DOLORES 3936 128-143-035 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1803 JESSELLE CT RIVERA JOSE MANUEL 3936 128-143-036 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1807 JESSELLE CT WHITE STEVEN A 3936 128-143-037 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1811 JESSELLE CT WILSON G LOUISE 3936 128-143-038 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1815 JESSELLE CT HUTSON PHILIP 3936 128-143-039 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1817 JESSELLE CT MARAVILLA JOSE JESUS P 3936 128-143-040 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1821 JESSELLE CT FISHER DEBRA J REVOCABLE TRUST 6/24/08 3936 128-143-041 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1818 JESSELLE CT VELASCO ROSA 2018 TRUST 7/20/18 3936 128-143-042 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1814 JESSELLE CT WILSON MINDI N 3936 128-143-043 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1810 JESSELLE CT OCONNELL BERNADETTE 3936 128-143-044 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1806 JESSELLE CT BUCKEY MICHAEL R & KATHLEEN A TRUST 5/29/19
3936 128-143-045 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1802 JESSELLE CT CORTEZ JUAN 3936 128-143-046 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1803 SASHA WAY REHKOPF JEFFREY CLINTON 3936 128-143-047 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1807 SASHA WAY HAK HENG CHUN 3936 128-143-048 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1811 SASHA WAY RUSH JULIA RAE 3936 128-143-049 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1815 SASHA WAY GUTIERREZ REBECCA 3936 128-143-050 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1814 SASHA WAY LLAMAS JOSE A MUNOZ 3936 128-143-051 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1810 SASHA WAY GUTIERREZ SALVADOR 3936 128-143-052 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 592.87$ 478.72$ 1,112.62$ 1804 SASHA WAY ZAVALA NAVOR 3936 128-143-053 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1807 LAUREN LN PORTICOS GREGORIO & MILA TRUST 3936 128-143-054 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1806 LAUREN LN DELAVEGA ERIC N 3936 128-143-055 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1802 LAUREN LN MADRIGAL MAYRA 3936 128-146-001 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 852 STANFORD RD MEMBRENO FIDEL ESCOBAR 3936 128-146-002 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 848 STANFORD RD DENNIS PAUL & EVELYN REVOCABLE TRUST 3936 128-146-003 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 844 STANFORD RD WURZER 1987 LIVING TRUST 8/21/87 3936 128-146-004 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 840 STANFORD RD CHASE PATRICK J 3936 128-146-005 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 836 STANFORD RD CORONA CRISPIN 3936 128-146-006 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 832 STANFORD RD RUBALCAVA MELISSA 3936 128-146-007 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1858 BERKELEY WAY BRAR UPKAR 3936 128-146-008 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1852 BERKELEY WAY GILL KULWANT SINGH 3936 128-146-009 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1848 BERKELEY WAY RAMIREZ AURELIANO F 3936 128-146-010 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1846 BERKELEY WAY KNOTTS RYAN PATRICK 3936 128-146-011 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1844 BERKELEY WAY HART JODY L 3936 128-146-012 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 825 CORNELL CT CABRERA NORBERTO VIVAR 3936 128-146-013 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 827 CORNELL CT KIM YONG KUN/OK NYO 2005 REVOCABLE TRUST
3936 128-146-014 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 829 CORNELL CT DELVALLE ARTURO G 3936 128-146-015 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 831 CORNELL CT CONTRERAS GUADALUPE 3936 128-146-016 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 832 CORNELL CT GARCIA LUIS PRADO 3936 128-146-017 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 830 CORNELL CT MONTALBO ANASTACIA CABADIN
3936 128-146-018 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 828 CORNELL CT FLORES STEVEN A 3936 128-146-019 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 826 CORNELL CT MCBRIDE LARRIANE E INDIVIDUAL LIVING TRUST
3936 128-146-020 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1832 BERKELEY WAY BORGES MICHAEL J 3936 128-146-021 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1830 BERKELEY WAY MORGRET JENNIFER 3936 128-146-022 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1824 BERKELEY WAY SUNSERI FRANK T 3936 128-146-023 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1815 BERKELEY WAY VELAZQUEZ PEDRO 3936 128-146-024 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1819 BERKELEY WAY GONZALES JOSE M 3936 128-146-025 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1823 BERKELEY WAY GABRIEL ROBERT 3936 128-146-026 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1827 BERKELEY WAY BUSNELLI ERNESTO A 3936 128-146-027 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1829 BERKELEY WAY COLOMBO KRISTIE 3936 128-146-028 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1831 BERKELEY WAY BREAULT SARAH REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 2/4/20
3936 128-146-029 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1833 BERKELEY WAY DUNCAN PATRICK J 3936 128-146-030 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1835 BERKELEY WAY LEANG JUNNA NAY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 12/7/17
3936 128-146-031 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1837 BERKELEY WAY SANCHEZ DAVID 3936 128-146-032 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1839 BERKELEY WAY TRAN NGOC K 3936 128-146-033 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1841 BERKELEY WAY WELCH JAMES L 3936 128-146-034 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1843 BERKELEY WAY POSPISIL LIVING TRUST 3936 128-146-035 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1845 BERKELEY WAY PEREZ ANNA B 3936 128-146-036 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1847 BERKELEY WAY GONZALEZ MARIA A 3936 128-146-037 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1849 BERKELEY WAY ABD FAMILY TRUST 5/12/07 3936 128-146-038 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1851 BERKELEY WAY GONZALEZ ESTEBAN 3936 128-146-039 NE Rivergate Roemer 1 296.43$ 239.36$ 556.31$ 1853 BERKELEY WAY FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SANTA MARIA