Agenda — Santa Maria City Council, November 19, 2024 (part 5 of 5)

A St
Betteravia RdBetteravia Rd
Northbound Westbound
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Westbound
Eastbound WestboundNorthbound

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Central Coast Transportation Consulting
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6
www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000010000000000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0001010000010000
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000010000000000
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000001000000000
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000001000000
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0201000000000000
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000000000000
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0010000000110100
T O T A L 0212031001120100
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 2:00 PM - 2:15 PM 0000000002000000
2:15 PM - 2:30 PM 0000000000000200
2:30 PM - 2:45 PM 0000000000000110
2:45 PM - 3:00 PM 0000000010100000
3:00 PM - 3:15 PM 0000001000000000
3:15 PM - 3:30 PM 0000000011000000
3:30 PM - 3:45 PM 0003001000010000
3:45 PM - 4:00 PM 0100000010000100
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000001010000
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000000000010000
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000000010000000
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000001000000000
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000100000000
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000000000000
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000100000010
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000000000000
T O T A L 0103003244130420
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 0201001001000000
3:15 PM - 4:15 PM 0103001022020100
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 41 P M 1003
PM Peak Total 7 5 AM 1001
Peds <>
00 AM PM
20 00
21 01
00 00
PM AM
Peds <>
02 Peds <>
0020 AM
0010 P M
Turning Movement Report
Betteravia Rd @ A St 34.9208
Santa Barbara -120.4641
Tuesday, May 30, 2023 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
A St
Betteravia Rd Betteravia Rd
A St Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Central Coast Transportation Consulting
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6
www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Le ft Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 1 2 2 34 1 5 2 2 11010111 2 1 2
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 2 4 264 2 6 20001052 1 1 1
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 1 1 7 01 1 5 3 6 2300003091
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 2 2 2 22 1 8 4 6 02200183 1 9 2
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 3 2 1 41 1 4 4 1 41002161 1 6 2
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 1 3 32 1 2 2 9 63100145 2 4 4
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 4 1 6 338 1 9 32001020 1 1 2
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 3 1 8 92 1 0 2 0 72301242 1 1 4
T O T A L 1 4 1 5 3 2 6 2 1 9 6 2 3 9 2 5 1 4 6156 3 3 1 4 1 2 2 1 8 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Le ft Thru Right Trucks 2:00 PM - 2:15 PM 1 1 1 109 1 6 34011111 1 6 1
2:15 PM - 2:30 PM 3 1 3 21 2 3 2 4 26205330 1 1 6
2:30 PM - 2:45 PM 1 1 9 44 1 3 1 7 03 1 2 44630 3 0 3
2:45 PM - 3:00 PM 0 1 3 22 1 7 1 5 12 1 1 36120 2 3 4
3:00 PM - 3:15 PM 0 2 2 34 1 6 1 3 01511030 1 9 1
3:15 PM - 3:30 PM 1 1 0 32 2 4 2 1 12210030 2 3 5
3:30 PM - 3:45 PM 1 2 1 52 2 3 2 1 02101020 2 8 3
3:45 PM - 4:00 PM 1 2 3 01 1 9 2 9 07210000 2 4 3
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 3 1 25 2 5 2 7 23102120 2 6 2
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 2 2 0 72 2 9 3 0 04033031 2 7 1
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 1 2 4 82 2 5 3 5 04022061 2 4 2
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0510 1 7 3 0 07000031 2 7 1
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 3 4 109 2 5 03110020 2 8 2
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 1 4 207 1 4 00000020 2 1 2
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0410 1 3 1 6 01001010 1 8 2
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 1 4 015 1 2 02222010 1 5 2
TOTAL 11 278 42 26 274 345 9 51 39 19 28 12 37 4 360 40 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Tru cks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 6 7 3 96 5 9 1 5 2 1 2 93023 2 1 9 6 8 9 3:45 PM - 4:45 PM 4 9 8 1 7 1 0 9 8 1 2 1 2 1 8 3671 1 1 2 1 0 1 8 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.85 7%
PM 2 121 98 0.921
PM 0.92 8%
AM 12 152 59 0.871
PHF 0.667 0.625
AM PM
3 3 68 101
60 92
7 2 21 11
PM AM
PHF

0.742 0.919 PHF

0.786 6 73 9 AM

0.902 4 98 17 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Westbound
Eastbound WestboundNorthbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

A St
McCoy LnDriveway
Northbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Southbound
A St @ McCoy Ln
Santa Barbara
Tuesday, May 30, 2023 Clear
Eastbound

34.9160
-120.4642

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Central Coast Transportation Consulting
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6
www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000000000000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000010000000000
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000010100000100
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000000000
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000000000000
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0100000100000010
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000100000001
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000100000000
T O T A L 0100020400000111
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 2:00 PM - 2:15 PM 0000000000000000
2:15 PM - 2:30 PM 0000000100000000
2:30 PM - 2:45 PM 0000000000000000
2:45 PM - 3:00 PM 0000010101010000
3:00 PM - 3:15 PM 0000000000030000
3:15 PM - 3:30 PM 0000000000000000
3:30 PM - 3:45 PM 0000000000000000
3:45 PM - 4:00 PM 0100000000000000
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000000000000
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0001000000000000
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000000000000000
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000000000001
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000100001000
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000000001000
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000000010000
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000000000000
T O T A L 0101010301052001
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0100010200000110
3:45 PM - 4:45 PM 0101000000000000
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 42 P M 0001
PM Peak Total 1 1 AM 0100
Peds <>
00 AM PM
00 10
00 10
00 00
PM AM
Peds <>
00 Peds <>
2010 AM
0010 P M
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
A St
Driveway McCoy Ln
A St Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
A St @ McCoy Ln 34.9160
Santa Barbara -120.4642
Tuesday, May 30, 2023 Clear

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Central Coast Transportation Consulting
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6
www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Le ft Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 33 111 3 3 23 85 31 7 10 1 20 2 1 5 12 12 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 27 106 3 5 13 118 28 2 6 1 20 1 0 5 16 13 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 3 9 1 2 7 06 2 0 1 5 4 2 6 3 1 2 6 1 8 71062 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 5 3 1 4 4 65 2 9 1 7 2 6 9 4 1 2 3 3 5 50333 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 40 137 4 1 24 150 50 4 30 0 41 4 0 0 17 4 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 2 2 1 0 9 36 1 6 1 6 0 3 7 1 9 4 0 3 2 8 1 7 0281 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 29 117 4 11 13 99 25 11 30 3 28 19 0 2 10 2 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 3 4 1 0 47 1 21 19 82 1 7 2 0 3 1 61 4 1 0 1 4 3 TOTAL 277 955 30 49 149 1036 287 57 160 20 206 69 3 17 86 40 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Le ft Thru Right Trucks 2:00 PM - 2:15 PM 18 95 2 4 10 97 11 7 20 2 21 7 3 2 22 8 2:15 PM - 2:30 PM 11 118 1 5 15 96 16 12 18 3 17 4 3 0 20 3 2:30 PM - 2:45 PM 22 123 1 7 16 103 17 9 53 2 21 3 3 0 20 5 2:45 PM - 3:00 PM 23 98 1 13 17 143 39 10 29 3 26 2 2 6 28 3 3:00 PM - 3:15 PM 19 159 1 8 10 138 12 3 49 3 16 8 2 3 24 3 3:15 PM - 3:30 PM 17 155 1 15 15 115 20 13 23 2 16 2 1 1 19 2 3:30 PM - 3:45 PM 25 186 2 13 12 183 14 11 47 3 27 0 3 3 72 2 3:45 PM - 4:00 PM 20 124 2 6 10 141 24 10 23 2 27 3 6 4 33 1 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 24 220 0 9 7 146 14 6 38 3 40 3 4 2 20 1 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 22 163 1 6 11 114 19 5 25 6 33 5 3 3 21 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 13 146 0 3 13 155 20 10 81 4 37 5 1 4 29 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 14 126 2 8 9 122 18 12 47 4 31 6 1 0 13 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 13 132 1 4 9 175 13 8 80 2 47 5 14 5 41 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 15 130 1 7 5 116 7 5 29 0 26 2 1 0 20 1 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 6 96 1 3 6 88 12 6 23 1 20 2 4 2 11 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 9 8 3 035 1 1 7 2 0 7 2 7 0 1 3 00070 TOTAL 271 2154 17 114 170 2049 276 134 612 40 418 57 51 35 400 30 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Tru cks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 154 517 13 18 89 636 182 30 94 12 122 33 1 5 34 10 3:30 PM - 4:30 PM 91 693 5 34 40 584 71 32 133 14 127 11 16 12 146 4 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.88 5%
PM 71 584 40 0.831
PM 0.84 4%
AM 182 636 89 0.84
PHF 0.846 0.803
AM PM
133 94 34 146
14 12 5 12
127 122 1 16
PM AM
PHF

0.588 0.558 PHF

0.842 154 517 13 AM

0.808 91 693 5 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Westbound
Eastbound WestboundNorthbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Skyway Dr
Fairway DrFairway Dr
Northbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Southbound
Fairway Dr @ Skyway Dr
Santa Barbara
Tuesday, May 30, 2023 Clear
Eastbound

34.9135
-120.4541

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Central Coast Transportation Consulting
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6
www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000000010000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0100000100000000
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0100000001000001
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000000000
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 1000000000010000
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0100000100000000
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000010000000000
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000001000000010
T O T A L 1300011201020011
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 2:00 PM - 2:15 PM 0000000000000000
2:15 PM - 2:30 PM 0000010000010000
2:30 PM - 2:45 PM 0000000000000000
2:45 PM - 3:00 PM 0000000000010000
3:00 PM - 3:15 PM 0000000000000000
3:15 PM - 3:30 PM 0000000000000000
3:30 PM - 3:45 PM 0000000600000100
3:45 PM - 4:00 PM 0000000800000000
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0100000400000000
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000000200000000
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000010000000000
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0100000000000000
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000100000000
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000000100000
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000000000000
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000010100000000
T O T A L 0200030 2 2 00120100
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 1200000101010001
3:30 PM - 4:30 PM 0100000 2 0 00000100
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 43 P M 0000
PM Peak Total 2 20 AM 0000
Peds <>
01 AM PM
00 00
01 01
00 00
PM AM
Peds <>
10 Peds <>
1120 AM
2 0 010 P M
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Skyway Dr
Fairway Dr Fairway Dr
Skyway Dr Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Fairway Dr @ Skyway Dr 34.9135
Santa Barbara -120.4541
Tuesday, May 30, 2023 Clear

A Street at Fairway General Plan Amendment and Rezone
Draft Transportation Impact Study
Central Coast Transportation Consulting September 2 023 Appendix B: Intersection Calculation Sheets
Intersection Analysis Summary
8/10/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 EX AM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 1 EX AMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

B18.90.464NB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedSkyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
B13.10.023WB ThruHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopA St/McCoy Ln2
C26.10.484SB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedBetteravia Road/A Street1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.484Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

26.1Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 1: Betteravia Road/A Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
YesYesYesYesCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

45.0045.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
460.100.250.25.0100.150.100.100.105.100.100.120.Entry Pocket Length [ft] 101101001001No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Betteravia RdBetteravia RdA StA StName
Intersection Setup
2Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0102Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0010v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 1000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NNNNNNNNPresence of On-Street Parking
125141112339Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
371312425992Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Other Adjustment Factor

0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.Peak Hour Factor
125131192338Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Growth Factor

8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Base Volume Adjustment Factor
125131192338Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Be RdBe RdA StA StName
Volumes
3Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 100.100.20.0100.100.20.00.020.020.00.020.020.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall
YesNoYesNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall

3.83.84.43.83.84.40.03.94.10.03.94.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

2.02.02.02.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 15150202000000290Pedestrian Clearance [s]
440440000040Walk [s]

4.04.02.04.04.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 5656275656270362703627Split [s]

1.01.02.01.01.02.00.01.52.00.01.52.0All red [s]

4.84.84.44.84.84.40.04.44.10.04.44.1Amber [s]
5050205050200302003020Maximum Green [s]
1010710107087087Minimum Green [s]
--Lea--Lea--Lea--LeaLead / Lag
Auxiliary Signal Groups
661225047083Signal Group
PerPerProtPerPerProtPerPerProtPerPerProtControl Type
Phasing & Timing

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
145Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
4Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

6.13159.36.962.5243.75.0174.1615.4334.5360.3495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.256.391.482.509.733.006.970.621.382.4195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

3.4188.720.534.7144.41.696.768.5719.1833.5250th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.143.550.821.395.791.673.870.340.771.3450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
BCCBCCCCBCLane Group LOS

18.223.130.819.026.531.428.2932.5719.8230.80d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.030.600.480.300.810.710.850.360.170.62X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.051.771.150.564.512.242.531.360.081.58d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.040.150.150.040.040.040.040.04k, delay calibration

18.221.429.718.422.029.125.7631.2119.7429.22d1, Uniform Delay [s] 39546611642350915731360396146c, Capacity [veh/h]
1511781691481781691610169516171695s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.010.160.030.090.230.070.170.010.040.05(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.260.260.070.290.290.090.190.040.240.09g / C, Green / Cycle 1717519196132166g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.803.804.403.803.804.403.904.103.904.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.805.806.405.805.806.405.906.105.906.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 66666666666666666666C, Cycle Length [s]
RCLRCLCLCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
5Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 30.8 19.8 19.8 32.5 28.2 28.2 31.4 26.5 19.0 30.8 23.1 18.2 Movement LOS C B B C C C C C B C C B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 26.04 28.62 25.90 24.24
Approach LOS C C C C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 26.06
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.484
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 8.0 8.0 30.1 8.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 25.51 25.51 9.78 25.51
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.122 2.122 2.512 2.418 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 911 911 1520 1520 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 9.79 9.78 1.90 1.90
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.822 2.035 2.637 2.135 Bicycle LOS A B B B
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
------------8765Ring 2
------------4321Ring 1
Sequence
6Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.023Volume to Capacity (v/c):

BLevel Of Service:

13.1Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

Two-way stopControl Type:

Intersection 2: A St/McCoy Ln
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesYesCrosswalk

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

35.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

0.000.000.000.000.000.0050.00.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000100000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
100.100.100.100.100.100.100.100.150.85.0100.100.Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001000001100No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
McCoy LnDrivewayA StA StName
Intersection Setup
0002Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
812204116187Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
236101441322Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Other Adjustment Factor

0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.Peak Hour Factor
692203115976Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Growth Factor

7.7.7.7.7.7.7.7.7.7.7.7.Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Base Volume Adjustment Factor
692203115976Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Mc LnDrivewaA StA StName
Volumes
7Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
BIntersection LOS

3.71d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBAAApproach LOS

10.0511.552.000.52d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]

8.648.643.530.820.820.820.000.003.720.000.200.3995th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.350.350.140.030.030.030.000.000.150.000.010.0295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ABBABBAAAAAAMovement LOS

9.1013.011.78.9812.612.80.000.007.590.000.007.70d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]

0.080.020.040.000.000.010.000.000.050.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoNoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
0000Storage Area [veh]
NoNoFlared Lane
StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
8Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.464Volume to Capacity (v/c):

BLevel Of Service:

18.9Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 3: Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
NoNoNoNoCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

40.0040.0055.0055.00Speed [mph]

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
100.100.100.100.100.95.0100.100.145.100.100.130.Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001001001001No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Fairway DrSkyway DrSkyway DrName
Intersection Setup
9Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0102Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0101v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 1010v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0100v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 0001v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NNNNNNNNPresence of On-Street Parking
361111271151Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
110332512414Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Other Adjustment Factor

0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.Peak Hour Factor
351119168151Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Growth Factor

5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Base Volume Adjustment Factor
351119168151Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Fa DrSk DrSk DrName
Volumes
10Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft]

0.0100.100.0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.100.Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall
NoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall
NoNoYesNoYesNoMinimum Recall

0.03.43.40.03.43.40.04.54.80.04.54.8l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 026260262601700190Pedestrian Clearance [s]
077077070070Walk [s]

0.04.04.00.04.04.00.04.02.00.04.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 05656056560573705737Split [s]

0.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.02.00.01.02.0All red [s]

0.04.44.40.04.44.40.05.54.80.05.54.8Amber [s]
05050050500503005030Maximum Green [s]
08808801070107Minimum Green [s]
--Lea--Lea--Lea--LeaLead / Lag
Auxiliary Signal Groups
088044061025Signal Group
PerPerPerPerPerPerPerPerProtPerPerProtControl Type
Phasing & Timing

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
149Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
11Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

20.740.5578.8657.96190.201.51.698.699.491.695th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.830.023.152.327.628.042.073.953.983.6795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

11.520.3043.8132.20106.113.28.654.855.250.950th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.460.011.751.294.244.551.152.192.212.0450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
BCCCBBCBBCLane Group LOS

19.3724.8322.4924.3219.118.825.613.713.726.3d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.150.000.510.360.760.760.590.440.440.79X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.320.011.961.022.842.611.190.630.622.36d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.150.150.150.150.040.150.150.04k, delay calibration

19.0524.8220.5323.3016.216.224.413.013.023.9d1, Uniform Delay [s] 303205297300591640172685692222c, Capacity [veh/h]
1583120315511328168182173180182173s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.030.000.100.080.270.260.060.170.170.10(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.190.190.190.190.350.350.100.380.380.13g / C, Green / Cycle 111111112020621217g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.403.403.403.404.504.504.804.504.504.80l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.405.405.405.406.506.506.806.506.506.80L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 57575757575757575757C, Cycle Length [s]
CLCLCCLCCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
12Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 26.3 13.7 13.7 25.6 18.9 19.1 24.3 22.4 22.4 24.8 19.3 19.3 Movement LOS C B B C B B C C C C B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 16.55 19.63 23.24 19.49
Approach LOS B B C B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 18.94
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.464
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 18.40 18.40 18.40 18.40
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.862 3.105 2.195 1.991 Crosswalk LOS C C B A
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1782 1782 1786 1786 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 0.34 0.34 0.33 0.32
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.201 2.410 1.989 1.636 Bicycle LOS B B A A
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
-------------865Ring 2
-------------421Ring 1
Sequence
13Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
8/10/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 EX AM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 1 EX AMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
1859
Total
Volume
34 Right
5 Thru
1 Left
Westbound
122
Right
12 Thru
94 Left
Eastbound
182
Right
636
Thru
89 Left
Southbound
13 Right
517
Thru
154
Left
Northbound
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
Intersection NameID
414
Total
Volume
68 Right
9 Thru
21 Left
Westbound
2 Right
0 Thru
3 Left
Eastbound
12 Right
152
Thru
59 Left
Southbound
9 Right
73 Thru
6 Left
Northbound
A St/McCoy Ln2
Intersection NameID
1320
Total
Volume
12 Right
255
Thru
51 Left
Westbound
116
Right
377
Thru
102
Left
Eastbound
145
Right
97 Thru
20 Left
Southbound
31 Right
32 Thru
82 Left
Northbound
Betteravia Road/A Street1
Intersection NameID
14Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
A St/McCoy Ln
Betteravia Road/A Street
15Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
A St/McCoy Ln
Betteravia Road/A Street
16Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 1: 1 EX AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Intersection Analysis Summary
8/9/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 EX PM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 2 EX PMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

C22.90.414SB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedSkyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
B13.70.005WB ThruHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopA St/McCoy Ln2
C30.30.583NB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedBetteravia Road/A Street1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 2: 2 EX PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.583Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

30.3Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 1: Betteravia Road/A Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
YesYesYesYesCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

45.0045.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Betteravia RdBetteravia RdA StA StName
Intersection Setup
2Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 2: 2 EX PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0100Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0011v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 1100v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking
283894113959626516944294394121Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 79710351496642117112330Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor

0.9400.9400.9400.9400.9400.9400.9400.9400.9400.9400.9400.940Peak Hour Factor 263663913156024915941274088114Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Growth Factor

8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 263663913156024915941274088114Base Volume Input [veh/h] Betteravia RdBetteravia RdA StA StName
Volumes
3Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 2: 2 EX PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft]

0.020.020.020.020.020.00.020.020.00.020.020.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall
YesNoYesNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall

0.03.84.43.83.84.40.03.94.10.03.94.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.02.02.02.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0150202000000290Pedestrian Clearance [s]
040440000040Walk [s]

0.04.02.04.04.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 056275656270362703627Split [s]

0.01.02.01.01.02.00.01.52.00.01.52.0All red [s]

0.04.84.44.84.84.40.04.44.10.04.44.1Amber [s]
050205050200302003020Maximum Green [s]
010710107087087Minimum Green [s]
--Lea--Lea--Lea--LeaLead / Lag
Auxiliary Signal Groups
061225047083Signal Group
PerPerProtPerPerProtPerPerProtPerPerProtControl Type
Phasing & Timing

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
145Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
4Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 2: 2 EX PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

16.4282.33.368.9368.205.173.3924.1893.13101.9295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.6611.31.332.7614.78.226.940.973.734.0895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

9.16174.18.538.3240.116.96.3313.4351.7456.6250th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.376.970.741.539.644.683.850.542.072.2650th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoNoYesYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
CCDBCCCDCDLane Group LOS

21.933.537.016.527.133.934.8137.6226.7438.08d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.070.850.460.240.870.870.850.410.390.79X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.116.191.330.315.022.973.121.370.263.46d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.040.150.150.040.040.040.040.04k, delay calibration

21.827.335.616.122.130.931.6936.2426.4734.61d1, Uniform Delay [s] 3894599056968430525171352153c, Capacity [veh/h]
1511781691471781691561169516871695s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.020.220.020.090.330.160.140.020.080.07(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.260.260.050.380.380.180.160.040.210.09g / C, Green / Cycle 20204303014123167g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.803.804.403.803.804.403.904.103.904.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.805.806.405.805.806.405.906.105.906.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 78787878787878787878C, Cycle Length [s]
RCLRCLCLCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
5Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 2: 2 EX PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 38.0 26.7 26.7 37.6 34.8 34.8 33.9 27.1 16.5 37.0 33.5 21.9 Movement LOS D C C D C C C C B D C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 32.05 35.15 27.45 33.17
Approach LOS C D C C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 30.35
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.583
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 8.0 8.0 30.1 8.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 4635.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 31.17 31.17 14.50 31.17
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.144 2.208 2.710 2.538 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 777 777 1295 1295 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 14.50 14.50 4.81 4.81
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.985 1.959 3.210 2.315 Bicycle LOS A A C B
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
------------8765Ring 2
------------4321Ring 1
Sequence
6Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 2: 2 EX PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.005Volume to Capacity (v/c):

BLevel Of Service:

13.7Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

Two-way stopControl Type:

Intersection 2: A St/McCoy Ln
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoNoNoCrosswalk

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

35.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
McCoy LnA StA StName
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
1102128732132107181074Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
2713221133275271Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor

0.9200.9200.9200.9200.9200.9200.9200.9200.9200.9200.9200.920Peak Hour Factor 10121176321219817984Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Growth Factor

8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 10121176321219817984Base Volume Input [veh/h]
McCoy LnA StA StName
Volumes
7Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 2: 2 EX PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
BIntersection LOS

4.42d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
ABAAApproach LOS

9.6411.503.440.23d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]

9.999.991.962.432.432.430.000.006.120.000.110.2195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.400.400.080.100.100.100.000.000.240.000.000.0195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ABBABBAAAAAAMovement LOS

9.2213.712.88.9413.513.60.000.007.750.000.007.57d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]

0.110.000.030.010.020.010.000.000.080.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoNoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
0000Storage Area [veh]
NoNoFlared Lane
StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
8Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 2: 2 EX PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.414Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

22.9Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 3: Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
NoNoNoNoCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

40.0040.0055.0055.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Fairway DrSkyway DrSkyway DrName
Intersection Setup
9Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 2: 2 EX PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
1001Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 002020v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 202000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking
17414191511715885695486825108Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 4345384402117412120627Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor

0.8400.8400.8400.8400.8400.8400.8400.8400.8400.8400.8400.840Peak Hour Factor 1461216127141337158440569391Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Growth Factor

4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1461216127141337158440569391Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Fairway DrSkyway DrSkyway DrName
Volumes
10Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 2: 2 EX PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft]

0.0100.100.0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.100.Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall
NoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall
NoNoYesNoYesNoMinimum Recall

0.03.43.40.03.43.40.04.54.80.04.54.8l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 026260262601700190Pedestrian Clearance [s]
077077070070Walk [s]

0.04.04.00.04.04.00.04.02.00.04.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 05656056560573705737Split [s]

0.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.02.00.01.02.0All red [s]

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
149Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
11Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 2: 2 EX PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

87.469.6176.6394.92210.216.30.0212.213.67.595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

3.500.383.073.808.438.651.208.518.522.7095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

48.595.3442.5752.73120.124.16.6122.122.37.550th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

1.940.211.702.114.834.990.674.884.891.5050th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoNoNoYesYesNoNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
BBBCCCCCCCLane Group LOS

17.0219.9216.6324.5724.624.430.322.222.230.2d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.360.050.320.440.760.760.430.720.720.66X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.620.080.501.213.363.230.992.422.411.72d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.150.150.150.150.040.150.150.04k, delay calibration

16.4019.8516.1323.3521.221.229.419.819.728.5d1, Uniform Delay [s] 515378524358504524111577578163c, Capacity [veh/h]
1537118315621163177184175183184175s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.120.020.110.140.220.220.030.230.230.06(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.340.340.340.340.280.280.060.310.310.09g / C, Green / Cycle 222222221818420206g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.403.403.403.404.504.504.804.504.504.80l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

B19.50.479NB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedSkyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
B13.60.025WB ThruHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopA St/McCoy Ln2
C26.70.500SB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedBetteravia Road/A Street1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.500Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

26.7Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 1: Betteravia Road/A Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
YesYesYesYesCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

45.0045.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Betteravia RdBetteravia RdA StA StName
Intersection Setup
2Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0102Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0010v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 1000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NNNNNNNNPresence of On-Street Parking
127141112439Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
371312425192Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Other Adjustment Factor

0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.Peak Hour Factor
127131112338Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
001800030513Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Growth Factor

8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Base Volume Adjustment Factor
125131192338Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Be RdBe RdA StA StName
Volumes
3Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft]

20.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall
YesNoYesNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall

3.83.84.43.83.84.43.93.94.13.93.94.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 151502020000029290Pedestrian Clearance [s]
440440000440Walk [s]

4.04.02.04.04.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 565627565627363627363627Split [s]

1.01.02.01.01.02.01.51.52.01.51.52.0All red [s]

4.84.84.44.84.84.44.44.44.14.44.44.1Amber [s]
505020505020303020303020Maximum Green [s]
1010710107887887Minimum Green [s]
--Lea--Lea--Lea--LeaLead / Lag
Auxiliary Signal Groups
661225447883Signal Group
PerPerProtPerPerProtPerPerProtPerPerProtControl Type
Phasing & Timing

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
145Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
4Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

6.22161.52.570.1250.78.1182.6215.9639.6264.8695th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.256.452.102.8110.03.127.300.641.582.5995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

3.4689.529.238.9150.43.3101.468.8722.0136.0350th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.143.581.171.566.011.744.060.350.881.4450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
BCCBCCCCCCLane Group LOS

18.122.831.619.727.332.629.0933.5020.4531.91d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.030.580.570.320.820.730.860.370.190.64X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.041.531.430.624.612.462.611.390.091.76d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.040.150.150.040.040.040.040.04k, delay calibration

18.121.330.219.122.730.126.4932.1120.3730.14d1, Uniform Delay [s] 41348613442250715431560394145c, Capacity [veh/h]
1511781691481781691612169516071695s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.010.160.050.090.230.070.170.010.050.05(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.270.270.080.280.280.090.190.040.240.09g / C, Green / Cycle 1919519196132176g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.803.804.403.803.804.403.904.103.904.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.805.806.405.805.806.405.906.105.906.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 68686868686868686868C, Cycle Length [s]
RCLRCLCLCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
5Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 31.9 20.4 20.4 33.5 29.0 29.0 32.6 27.3 19.7 31.6 22.8 18.1 Movement LOS C C C C C C C C B C C B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 26.76 29.43 26.66 24.55
Approach LOS C C C C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 26.69
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.500
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 8.0 8.0 30.1 8.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 26.45 26.45 10.55 26.45
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.142 2.125 2.519 2.429 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 886 886 1477 1477 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 10.56 10.55 2.32 2.32
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.838 2.040 2.652 2.170 Bicycle LOS A B B B
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
------------8765Ring 2
------------4321Ring 1
Sequence
6Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.025Volume to Capacity (v/c):

BLevel Of Service:

13.6Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

Two-way stopControl Type:

Intersection 2: A St/McCoy Ln
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesYesCrosswalk

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

35.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

0.000.000.000.000.000.00700.0.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000100000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
100.100.100.100.100.100.100.100.150.85.0100.100.Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100000001100No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
McCoy LnA StA StName
Intersection Setup
0002Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
812204126197Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
237101451322Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Other Adjustment Factor

0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.Peak Hour Factor
692203115186Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
003000030190Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Growth Factor

7.7.7.7.7.7.7.7.7.7.7.7.Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Base Volume Adjustment Factor
692203115976Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Mc LnA StA StName
Volumes
7Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
BIntersection LOS

3.49d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBAAApproach LOS

10.2711.961.770.47d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]

8.848.844.170.870.870.870.000.003.760.000.200.4195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.350.350.170.030.030.030.000.000.150.000.010.0295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ABBABBAAAAAAMovement LOS

9.1513.512.19.0913.113.40.000.007.620.000.007.78d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]

0.080.020.050.000.000.010.000.000.050.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoNoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
0000Storage Area [veh]
NoNoFlared Lane
StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
8Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.479Volume to Capacity (v/c):

BLevel Of Service:

19.5Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 3: Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
NoNoNoNoCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

40.0040.0055.0055.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Fairway DrSkyway DrSkyway DrName
Intersection Setup
9Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0102Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0101v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 1010v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0100v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 0001v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NNNNNNNNPresence of On-Street Parking
361111271151Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
110332512414Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Other Adjustment Factor

0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.Peak Hour Factor
351119168151Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000403800001Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Growth Factor

5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Base Volume Adjustment Factor
351119168151Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Fa DrSk DrSk DrName
Volumes
10Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 100.100.100.0.00.00.00.00.00.0100.100.100.Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall
NoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall
NoNoYesNoYesNoMinimum Recall

3.43.43.43.43.43.44.54.54.84.54.54.8l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 2626262626261717019190Pedestrian Clearance [s]
777777770770Walk [s]

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.02.04.04.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 565656565656575737575737Split [s]

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.02.01.01.02.0All red [s]

4.44.44.44.44.44.45.55.54.85.55.54.8Amber [s]
505050505050505030505030Maximum Green [s]
8888881010710107Minimum Green [s]
--Lea--Lea--Lea--LeaLead / Lag
Auxiliary Signal Groups
888444661225Signal Group
PerPerPerPerPerPerPerPerProtPerPerProtControl Type
Phasing & Timing

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
149Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
11Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

21.630.5784.6962.21200.211.54.2100.101.103.95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.870.023.392.498.008.462.174.024.054.1595th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

12.020.3247.0534.56112.121.30.155.856.257.650th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.480.011.881.384.524.851.212.232.252.3050th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
CCCCBBCBBCLane Group LOS

20.0025.7323.3425.1519.819.526.613.513.526.7d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.150.010.530.370.760.760.600.420.420.80X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.320.012.051.082.952.711.280.570.572.31d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.150.150.150.150.040.150.150.04k, delay calibration

19.6925.7221.2824.0716.816.825.312.912.924.4d1, Uniform Delay [s] 304199298298590641168708715240c, Capacity [veh/h]
1583119915511328168182173180182173s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.030.000.100.080.270.270.060.170.170.11(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.190.190.190.190.350.350.100.390.390.14g / C, Green / Cycle 111111112121623238g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.403.403.403.404.504.504.804.504.504.80l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.405.405.405.406.506.506.806.506.506.80L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 59595959595959595959C, Cycle Length [s]
CLCLCCLCCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
12Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 26.7 13.5 13.5 26.6 19.6 19.8 25.1 23.3 23.3 25.7 20.0 20.0 Movement LOS C B B C B B C C C C C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 16.74 20.36 24.08 20.13
Approach LOS B C C C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 19.48
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.479
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 19.34 19.34 19.34 19.34
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.871 3.115 2.211 1.993 Crosswalk LOS C C B A
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1723 1723 1727 1727 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 0.56 0.56 0.55 0.55
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.215 2.418 2.000 1.636 Bicycle LOS B B B A
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
-------------865Ring 2
-------------421Ring 1
Sequence
13Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
8/10/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 EX +P AM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 3 EX +P AMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
1888
Total
Volume
34 Right
5 Thru
1 Left
Westbound
126
Right
12 Thru
97 Left
Eastbound
190
Right
636
Thru
89 Left
Southbound
13 Right
517
Thru
168
Left
Northbound
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
Intersection NameID
457
Total
Volume
68 Right
9 Thru
24 Left
Westbound
2 Right
0 Thru
3 Left
Eastbound
12 Right
182
Thru
59 Left
Southbound
10 Right
82 Thru
6 Left
Northbound
A St/McCoy Ln2
Intersection NameID
1359
Total
Volume
12 Right
255
Thru
70 Left
Westbound
124
Right
377
Thru
102
Left
Eastbound
145
Right
100
Thru
20 Left
Southbound
36 Right
33 Thru
85 Left
Northbound
Betteravia Road/A Street1
Intersection NameID
14Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
A St/McCoy Ln
Betteravia Road/A Street
15Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
A St/McCoy Ln
Betteravia Road/A Street
16Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
A St/McCoy Ln
Betteravia Road/A Street
17Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 3: 3 EX +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Intersection Analysis Summary
8/10/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 EX +P PM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 4 EX +P PMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

C23.10.425NB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedSkyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
B14.30.005WB ThruHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopA St/McCoy Ln2
C31.20.588SB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedBetteravia Road/A Street1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.588Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

31.2Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 1: Betteravia Road/A Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
YesYesYesYesCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

45.0045.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Betteravia RdBetteravia RdA StA StName
Intersection Setup
2Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0100Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0030v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 3000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0002v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 2000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NNNNNNNNPresence of On-Street Parking
235152142691Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
791316417123Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Other Adjustment Factor

0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.Peak Hour Factor
234152142591Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
008300010127Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Growth Factor

8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Base Volume Adjustment Factor
233152142481Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Be RdBe RdA StA StName
Volumes
3Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft]

20.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall
YesNoYesNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall

3.83.84.43.83.84.43.93.94.13.93.94.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 151502020000029290Pedestrian Clearance [s]
440440000440Walk [s]

4.04.02.04.04.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 565627565627363627363627Split [s]

1.01.02.01.01.02.01.51.52.01.51.52.0All red [s]

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
145Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
4Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

16.9287.41.874.3382.213.180.1624.99111.98111.7195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.6811.41.672.9815.28.557.211.004.484.4795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

9.43177.23.241.3252.122.100.0913.8862.2162.0650th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.387.110.931.6510.04.914.000.562.492.4850th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoNoYesYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
CCDBCDDDCDLane Group LOS

22.333.637.917.228.235.635.7738.7327.5738.73d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.070.840.500.250.880.870.850.410.440.80X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.115.691.430.335.313.813.151.400.323.35d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.040.150.150.050.040.040.040.04k, delay calibration

22.227.936.416.822.931.832.6237.3327.2535.39d1, Uniform Delay [s] 39346510056568030525171357162c, Capacity [veh/h]
1501781691481781691562169516611695s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.020.220.030.100.330.160.140.020.100.08(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.260.260.060.380.380.180.160.040.210.10g / C, Green / Cycle 21215303014133178g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.803.804.403.803.804.403.904.103.904.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.805.806.405.805.806.405.906.105.906.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 80808080808080808080C, Cycle Length [s]
RCLRCLCLCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
5Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 38.7 27.5 27.5 38.7 35.7 35.7 35.6 28.2 17.2 37.9 33.6 22.3 Movement LOS D C C D D D D C B D C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 32.59 36.12 28.66 33.40
Approach LOS C D C C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 31.23
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.588
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 8.0 8.0 30.1 8.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 3733.67 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 32.28 32.28 15.46 32.28
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.164 2.211 2.716 2.550 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 755 755 1259 1259 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 15.46 15.46 5.48 5.48
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.033 1.961 3.216 2.330 Bicycle LOS B A C B
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
------------8765Ring 2
------------4321Ring 1
Sequence
6Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.005Volume to Capacity (v/c):

BLevel Of Service:

14.3Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

Two-way stopControl Type:

Intersection 2: A St/McCoy Ln
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesYesCrosswalk

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

35.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
McCoy LnA StA StName
Intersection Setup
0010Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
121873211214Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
213221132531Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Other Adjustment Factor

0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.Peak Hour Factor
121763219114Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
001000010220Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Growth Factor

8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Base Volume Adjustment Factor
121763219194Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Mc LnA StA StName
Volumes
7Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
BIntersection LOS

4.14d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
ABAAApproach LOS

9.8511.823.300.19d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]

10.310.32.272.562.562.560.000.006.310.000.110.2295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.410.410.090.100.100.100.000.000.250.000.000.0195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ABBABBAAAAAAMovement LOS

9.3514.213.49.0014.014.10.000.007.830.000.007.60d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]

0.120.000.030.010.020.010.000.000.080.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoNoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
0000Storage Area [veh]
NoNoFlared Lane
StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
8Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.425Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

23.1Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 3: Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
NoNoNoNoCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

40.0040.0055.0055.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Fairway DrSkyway DrSkyway DrName
Intersection Setup
9Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
1001Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 010010v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 010010v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NNNNNNNNPresence of On-Street Parking
111111864681Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
445444211122Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Other Adjustment Factor

0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.Peak Hour Factor
111111754569Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000107300006Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Growth Factor

4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.Base Volume Adjustment Factor
111111754569Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Fa DrSk DrSk DrName
Volumes
10Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

3.43.43.43.43.43.44.54.54.84.54.54.8l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 2626262626261717019190Pedestrian Clearance [s]
777777770770Walk [s]

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.02.04.04.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 565656565656575737575737Split [s]

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.02.01.01.02.0All red [s]

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
149Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
11Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

88.039.8584.83101.79214.220.30.5215.215.73.795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

3.520.393.394.078.598.831.228.618.622.9595th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

48.905.4747.1356.55123.127.16.9123.124.40.950th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

1.960.221.892.264.945.120.684.954.971.6450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoNoNoYesYesNoNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
BCBCCCCCCCLane Group LOS

16.9720.4016.8824.7525.024.930.822.322.331.0d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.360.050.340.460.760.760.440.720.720.70X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.580.080.551.263.463.321.022.392.382.02d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.150.150.150.150.040.150.150.04k, delay calibration

16.4020.3216.3323.4821.521.529.719.919.928.9d1, Uniform Delay [s] 529368528366502523110578580164c, Capacity [veh/h]
1563116915601176176184175183184175s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.120.020.120.140.220.220.030.230.230.07(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.340.340.340.340.280.280.060.310.310.09g / C, Green / Cycle 222222221919421216g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.403.403.403.404.504.504.804.504.504.80l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.405.405.405.406.506.506.806.506.506.80L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 66666666666666666666C, Cycle Length [s]
CLCLCCLCCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
12Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 31.0 22.3 22.3 30.8 24.9 25.0 24.7 16.8 16.8 20.4 16.9 16.9 Movement LOS C C C C C C C B B C B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 23.43 25.32 20.64 17.29
Approach LOS C C C B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 23.14
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.425
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 22.86 22.86 22.86 22.86
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.962 3.268 2.168 2.043 Crosswalk LOS C C B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1533 1533 1536 1536 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 1.80 1.80 1.77 1.77
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.340 2.245 2.135 1.901 Bicycle LOS B B B A
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
-------------865Ring 2
-------------421Ring 1
Sequence
13Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
8/10/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 EX +P PM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 4 EX +P PMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
1960
Total
Volume
146
Right
12 Thru
16 Left
Westbound
139
Right
14 Thru
140
Left
Eastbound
74 Right
584
Thru
40 Left
Southbound
5 Right
693
Thru
97 Left
Northbound
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
Intersection NameID
512
Total
Volume
101
Right
2 Thru
12 Left
Westbound
7 Right
6 Thru
3 Left
Eastbound
2 Right
133
Thru
98 Left
Southbound
19 Right
125
Thru
4 Left
Northbound
A St/McCoy Ln2
Intersection NameID
1879
Total
Volume
26 Right
366
Thru
47 Left
Westbound
134
Right
560
Thru
249
Left
Eastbound
159
Right
42 Thru
27 Left
Southbound
58 Right
90 Thru
121
Left
Northbound
Betteravia Road/A Street1
Intersection NameID
14Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Turning Movement Volume: Detail
8/10/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 EX +P PM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 4 EX +P PMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
1960
0 28
0 -
1932
Total
Volume
146
0 0
0 1.00
146
Right
12 0
0 0

1.00 12
Thru
16 0
0 0

1.00 16
Left
Westbound
139
0 12
0 1.00
127
Right
14 0
0 0

1.00 14
Thru
140
0 7
0 1.00
133
Left
Eastbound
74 0
3 0

1.00 71
Right
584
0 0
0 1.00
584
Thru
40 0
0 0

1.00 40
Left
Southbound
5 0
0 0

1.00 5
Right
693
0 0
0 1.00
693
Thru
97 0
6 0

1.00 91
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Skyway
Dr/Fairway Dr3
Volume TypeIntersection
NameID
512
0 42
0 -
470
Total
Volume
101
0 0
0 1.00
101
Right
2 0
0 0

1.00 2
Thru
12 0
1 0

1.00 11
Left
Westbound
7 0
0 0

1.00 7
Right
6 0
0 0

1.00 6
Thru
3 0
0 0

1.00 3
Left
Eastbound
2 0
0 0

1.00 2
Right
133
0 12
0 1.00
121
Thru
98 0
0 0

1.00 98
Left
Southbound
19 0
2 0

1.00 17
Right
125
0 27
0 1.00
98 Thru
4 0
0 0

1.00 4
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
A St/McCoy Ln2
Volume TypeIntersection
NameID
1879
0 39
0 -
1840
Total
Volume
26 0
0 0

1.00 26
Right
366
0 0
0 1.00
366
Thru
47 0
8 0

1.00 39
Left
Westbound
134
0 3
0 1.00
131
Right
560
0 0
0 1.00
560
Thru
249
0 0
0 1.00
249
Left
Eastbound
159
0 0
0 1.00
159
Right
42 0
1 0

1.00 41
Thru
27 0
0 0

1.00 27
Left
Southbound
58 0
18 0

1.00 40
Right
90 0
2 0

1.00 88
Thru
121
0 7
0 1.00
114
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
Betteravia
Road/A Street1
Volume TypeIntersection
NameID
15Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
A St/McCoy Ln
Betteravia Road/A Street
16Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
A St/McCoy Ln
Betteravia Road/A Street
17Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
A St/McCoy Ln
Betteravia Road/A Street
18Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 4: 4 EX +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Intersection Analysis Summary
8/14/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 CM AM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 5 CM AMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

C21.20.521SB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedSkyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
B13.60.025WB ThruHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopA St/McCoy Ln2
C32.20.594NB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedBetteravia Road/A Street1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.594Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

32.2Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 1: Betteravia Road/A Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
YesYesYesYesCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

45.0045.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Betteravia RdBetteravia RdA StA StName
Intersection Setup
2Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0102Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0010v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 1000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking
2232665152478130207141334343120Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 58216381203352358111130Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Other Adjustment Factor

0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92Peak Hour Factor 2030060140440120190130304040110Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor

8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Base Volume Adjustment Factor 2030060140440120190130304040110Base Volume Input [veh/h] Betteravia RdBetteravia RdA StA StName
Volumes
3Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft]

20.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall
YesNoYesNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall

3.83.84.43.83.84.43.93.94.13.93.94.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 151502020000029290Pedestrian Clearance [s]
440440000440Walk [s]

4.04.02.04.04.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 565627565627363627363627Split [s]

1.01.02.01.01.02.01.51.52.01.51.52.0All red [s]

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
145Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
4Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

13.3230.56.796.0342.115.277.0129.4453.97108.6295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.539.232.273.8413.64.6311.081.182.164.3495th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

7.39135.31.553.3220.64.2170.0716.3629.9860.3550th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.305.421.262.138.822.576.800.651.202.4150th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
CCDCCDDDCDLane Group LOS

21.628.039.322.232.240.035.5939.8522.5140.45d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.050.650.580.330.860.800.900.430.190.79X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.071.991.780.585.533.405.061.410.073.54d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.040.150.150.040.060.040.040.04k, delay calibration

21.526.037.521.726.636.630.5338.4422.4436.92d1, Uniform Delay [s] 42750411246455716338577457151c, Capacity [veh/h]
1511781691481781691611169516151695s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.010.180.040.100.270.080.220.020.050.07(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.280.280.070.310.310.100.240.050.280.09g / C, Green / Cycle 2323526268204237g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.803.804.403.803.804.403.904.103.904.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.805.806.405.805.806.405.906.105.906.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 83838383838383838383C, Cycle Length [s]
RCLRCLCLCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
5Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 40.4 22.5 22.5 39.8 35.5 35.5 40.0 32.2 22.2 39.3 28.0 21.6 Movement LOS D C C D D D D C C D C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 32.96 35.96 31.56 29.46
Approach LOS C D C C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 32.18
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.594
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 8.0 8.0 30.1 8.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 33.64 33.64 16.65 33.64
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.183 2.188 2.618 2.483 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 730 730 1217 1217 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 16.66 16.65 6.33 6.33
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.900 2.188 2.814 2.241 Bicycle LOS A B C B
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
------------8765Ring 2
------------4321Ring 1
Sequence
6Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.025Volume to Capacity (v/c):

BLevel Of Service:

13.6Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

Two-way stopControl Type:

Intersection 2: A St/McCoy Ln
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesYesCrosswalk

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

35.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
McCoy LnA StA StName
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
761133110112218576119811Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
1938303546193243Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Other Adjustment Factor

0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92Peak Hour Factor 701030100102017070109010Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor

7.007.007.007.007.007.007.007.007.007.007.007.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Base Volume Adjustment Factor 701030100102017070109010Base Volume Input [veh/h]
McCoy LnA StA StName
Volumes
7Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
BIntersection LOS

3.99d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBAAApproach LOS

10.4711.362.050.71d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]

8.508.505.142.912.912.910.000.004.160.000.310.6395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.340.340.210.120.120.120.000.000.170.000.010.0395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ABBABBAAAAAAMovement LOS

9.1313.612.59.1713.313.50.000.007.630.000.007.74d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]

0.080.020.060.010.000.030.000.000.050.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoNoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
0000Storage Area [veh]
NoNoFlared Lane
StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
8Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.521Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

21.2Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 3: Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
NoNoNoNoCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

40.0040.0055.0055.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Fairway DrSkyway DrSkyway DrName
Intersection Setup
9Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking
5411111632212022879312022641196Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1433415305719830516049Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Other Adjustment Factor

0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92Peak Hour Factor 5010101502011021073011020590180Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor

5.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Base Volume Adjustment Factor 5010101502011021073011020590180Base Volume Input [veh/h] Fairway DrSkyway DrSkyway DrName
Volumes
10Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

3.43.43.43.43.43.44.54.54.84.54.54.8l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 2626262626261717019190Pedestrian Clearance [s]
777777770770Walk [s]

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.02.04.04.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 565656565656575737575737Split [s]

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.02.01.01.02.0All red [s]

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
149Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
11Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

35.427.23113.4577.83239.252.76.0125.126.122.95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

1.420.294.543.119.5810.13.045.015.074.8895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

19.684.0263.0343.24141.151.42.269.670.467.750th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.790.162.521.735.676.071.692.792.822.7150th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
CCCCCCCBBCLane Group LOS

21.9929.1025.7428.1421.421.130.714.214.229.5d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.200.060.580.420.790.790.720.440.440.80X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.430.192.321.373.192.932.170.590.582.38d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.150.150.150.150.040.150.150.04k, delay calibration

21.5628.9123.4226.7718.218.228.513.713.727.1d1, Uniform Delay [s] 323183321288623674167746755244c, Capacity [veh/h]
1592117015791304168182173180182173s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.040.010.120.090.290.290.070.180.180.11(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.200.200.200.200.370.370.100.410.410.14g / C, Green / Cycle 131313132424627279g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.403.403.403.404.504.504.804.504.504.80l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.405.405.405.406.506.506.806.506.506.80L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 65656565656565656565C, Cycle Length [s]
CLCLCCLCCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
12Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 29.5 14.2 14.2 30.7 21.2 21.4 28.1 25.7 25.7 29.1 21.9 21.9 Movement LOS C B B C C C C C C C C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 17.76 22.30 26.68 23.02
Approach LOS B C C C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 21.25
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.521
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 22.48 22.48 22.48 22.48
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.950 3.188 2.243 2.026 Crosswalk LOS C C B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1551 1551 1554 1554 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 1.64 1.64 1.62 1.62
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.268 2.501 2.063 1.685 Bicycle LOS B B B A
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
-------------865Ring 2
-------------421Ring 1
Sequence
13Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
8/14/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 CM AM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 5 CM AMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
2190
Total
Volume
50 Right
10 Thru
10 Left
Westbound
150
Right
20 Thru
110
Left
Eastbound
210
Right
730
Thru
110
Left
Southbound
20 Right
590
Thru
180
Left
Northbound
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
Intersection NameID
500
Total
Volume
70 Right
10 Thru
30 Left
Westbound
10 Right
0 Thru
10 Left
Eastbound
20 Right
170
Thru
70 Left
Southbound
10 Right
90 Thru
10 Left
Northbound
A St/McCoy Ln2
Intersection NameID
1620
Total
Volume
20 Right
300
Thru
60 Left
Westbound
140
Right
440
Thru
120
Left
Eastbound
190
Right
130
Thru
30 Left
Southbound
40 Right
40 Thru
110
Left
Northbound
Betteravia Road/A Street1
Intersection NameID
14Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
A St/McCoy Ln
Betteravia Road/A Street
15Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 5: 5 CM AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Intersection Analysis Summary
8/14/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 CM PM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 6 CM PMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

C25.20.462NB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedSkyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
C15.40.030EB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopA St/McCoy Ln2
D50.40.717EB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedBetteravia Road/A Street1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.717Volume to Capacity (v/c):

DLevel Of Service:

50.4Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 1: Betteravia Road/A Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
YesYesYesYesCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

45.0045.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Betteravia RdBetteravia RdA StA StName
Intersection Setup
2Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0100Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0011v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 1100v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking
3245753170691309223644353117160Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8114134317377561611132940Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Other Adjustment Factor

0.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.94Peak Hour Factor 3043050160650290210604050110150Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor

8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3043050160650290210604050110150Base Volume Input [veh/h] Betteravia RdBetteravia RdA StA StName
Volumes
3Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft]

20.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall
YesNoYesNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall

3.83.84.43.83.84.43.93.94.13.93.94.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 151502020000029290Pedestrian Clearance [s]
440440000440Walk [s]

4.04.02.04.04.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 565627565627363627363627Split [s]

1.01.02.01.01.02.01.51.52.01.51.52.0All red [s]

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
145Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
4Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

27.3456.65.0125.662.431.328.7753.09162.99196.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

1.0918.22.605.0026.517.213.152.126.527.8495th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

15.1311.36.169.4482.291.209.9529.5090.55110.0050th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.6112.41.452.7819.311.68.401.183.624.4050th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoNoYesYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
CDDCDFDDCDLane Group LOS

28.746.853.521.446.486.754.6053.2933.1251.85d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.070.900.610.280.931.000.910.540.380.85X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.109.122.560.3415.841.811.692.140.204.02d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.170.040.150.360.330.130.040.040.04k, delay calibration

28.637.750.921.030.544.842.9151.1532.9247.84d1, Uniform Delay [s] 4305078761674030931479448189c, Capacity [veh/h]
1511781691481781691565169516871695s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.020.260.030.110.390.180.180.030.100.09(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.280.280.050.420.420.180.200.050.270.11g / C, Green / Cycle 313164646202252912g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.803.804.403.803.804.403.904.103.904.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.805.806.405.805.806.405.906.105.906.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 110110110110110110110110110110C, Cycle Length [s]
RCLRCLCLCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
5Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 51.8 33.1 33.1 53.2 54.6 54.6 86.7 46.4 21.4 53.5 46.8 28.7 Movement LOS D C C D D D F D C D D C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 42.20 54.43 53.43 46.44
Approach LOS D D D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 50.41
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.717
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 8.0 8.0 30.1 8.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 1578.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 47.08 47.08 28.82 47.08
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.219 2.293 2.858 2.629 Crosswalk LOS B B C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 549 549 916 916 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 28.82 28.82 16.09 16.08
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.104 2.104 3.490 2.454 Bicycle LOS B B C B
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
------------8765Ring 2
------------4321Ring 1
Sequence
6Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.030Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

15.4Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

Two-way stopControl Type:

Intersection 2: A St/McCoy Ln
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesYesCrosswalk

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

35.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
McCoy LnA StA StName
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
1201122111111111411202212011Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 3035333335305303Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Other Adjustment Factor

0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92Peak Hour Factor 1101020101010101301102011010Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor

8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1101020101010101301102011010Base Volume Input [veh/h]
McCoy LnA StA StName
Volumes
7Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
CIntersection LOS

5.04d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBAAApproach LOS

10.5913.213.450.55d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]

13.513.54.215.625.625.620.000.007.040.000.300.6095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.540.540.170.220.220.220.000.000.280.000.010.0295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ABBABCAAAAAAMovement LOS

9.5214.914.29.3614.815.40.000.007.820.000.007.62d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]

0.130.030.050.010.030.030.000.000.090.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoNoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
0000Storage Area [veh]
NoNoFlared Lane
StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
8Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.462Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

25.2Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 3: Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
NoNoNoNoCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

40.0040.0055.0055.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Fairway DrSkyway DrSkyway DrName
Intersection Setup
9Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking
239223316322174987285411870120Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6058415432418214321730Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Other Adjustment Factor

0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92Peak Hour Factor 220203015020160906705010800110Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor

4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Base Volume Adjustment Factor 220203015020160906705010800110Base Volume Input [veh/h] Fairway DrSkyway DrSkyway DrName
Volumes
10Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

3.43.43.43.43.43.44.54.54.84.54.54.8l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 2626262626261717019190Pedestrian Clearance [s]
777777770770Walk [s]

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.02.04.04.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 565656565656575737575737Split [s]

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.02.01.01.02.0All red [s]

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
149Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
11Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
138.8118.4792.36124.49244.251.38.2250.251.87.595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

5.550.743.694.989.7710.01.5310.010.03.5095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

77.1210.2651.3169.16145.150.21.2150.150.48.650th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

3.080.412.052.775.826.040.856.016.031.9550th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] YesNoNoNoYesNoNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
BCBCCCCCCCLane Group LOS

18.5921.1217.2529.0527.026.833.524.924.834.9d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.460.080.330.540.780.780.470.760.760.77X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.830.130.471.973.713.561.142.882.872.95d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.150.150.150.150.040.150.150.04k, delay calibration

17.7620.9916.7827.0823.223.232.422.022.031.9d1, Uniform Delay [s] 566391569324517539114581584156c, Capacity [veh/h]
1584117915921100176184175183184175s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.160.030.120.160.230.230.030.240.240.07(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.360.360.360.360.290.290.060.320.320.09g / C, Green / Cycle 262626262121523236g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.403.403.403.404.504.504.804.504.504.80l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.405.405.405.406.506.506.806.506.506.80L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 72727272727272727272C, Cycle Length [s]
CLCLCCLCCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
12Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 34.9 24.8 24.9 33.5 26.9 27.0 29.0 17.2 17.2 21.1 18.5 18.5 Movement LOS C C C C C C C B B C B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 26.09 27.33 22.97 18.88
Approach LOS C C C B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 25.24
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.462
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 25.68 25.68 25.68 25.68
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.022 3.332 2.187 2.093 Crosswalk LOS C C B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1409 1409 1412 1412 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 3.13 3.13 3.10 3.10
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.385 2.286 2.152 2.045 Bicycle LOS B B B B
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
-------------865Ring 2
-------------421Ring 1
Sequence
13Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
8/14/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 CM PM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 6 CM PMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
2330
Total
Volume
220
Right
20 Thru
30 Left
Westbound
150
Right
20 Thru
160
Left
Eastbound
90 Right
670
Thru
50 Left
Southbound
10 Right
800
Thru
110
Left
Northbound
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
Intersection NameID
560
Total
Volume
110
Right
10 Thru
20 Left
Westbound
10 Right
10 Thru
10 Left
Eastbound
10 Right
130
Thru
110
Left
Southbound
20 Right
110
Thru
10 Left
Northbound
A St/McCoy Ln2
Intersection NameID
2230
Total
Volume
30 Right
430
Thru
50 Left
Westbound
160
Right
650
Thru
290
Left
Eastbound
210
Right
60 Thru
40 Left
Southbound
50 Right
110
Thru
150
Left
Northbound
Betteravia Road/A Street1
Intersection NameID
14Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
A St/McCoy Ln
Betteravia Road/A Street
15Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 6: 6 CM PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Intersection Analysis Summary
8/14/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 CM+P AM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 7 CM +P AMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

C21.90.535SB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedSkyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
B14.10.026WB ThruHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopA St/McCoy Ln2
C33.30.610NB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedBetteravia Road/A Street1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.610Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

33.3Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 1: Betteravia Road/A Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
YesYesYesYesCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

45.0045.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Betteravia RdBetteravia RdA StA StName
Intersection Setup
2Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0100Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0011v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 1100v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking
2232686161478130207145335045123Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 58221401203352368131131Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Other Adjustment Factor

0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92Peak Hour Factor 2030079148440120190133304641113Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor

8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Base Volume Adjustment Factor 2030079148440120190133304641113Base Volume Input [veh/h] Betteravia RdBetteravia RdA StA StName
Volumes
3Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft]

20.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall
YesNoYesNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall

3.83.84.43.83.84.43.93.94.13.93.94.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 151502020000029290Pedestrian Clearance [s]
440440000440Walk [s]

4.04.02.04.04.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 565627565627363627363627Split [s]

1.01.02.01.01.02.01.51.52.01.51.52.0All red [s]

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
145Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
4Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

13.6235.79.0106.352.119.292.3130.4561.70114.8895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.559.413.164.2614.14.7811.691.222.474.6095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

7.59138.43.859.1228.66.4181.7616.9134.2863.8250th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.305.541.762.369.152.667.270.681.372.5550th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
CCDCCDDDCDLane Group LOS

21.928.241.423.133.141.137.9341.0423.0541.45d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.050.640.710.350.860.800.910.430.200.80X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.071.862.820.645.643.466.551.450.083.54d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.040.150.150.040.080.040.040.04k, delay calibration

21.826.438.622.527.537.631.3739.5922.9737.91d1, Uniform Delay [s] 43551312246155616238876467154c, Capacity [veh/h]
1511781691471781691613169516291695s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.010.180.050.110.270.080.220.020.060.07(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.290.290.070.310.310.100.240.040.290.09g / C, Green / Cycle 2424626268204248g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.803.804.403.803.804.403.904.103.904.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.805.806.405.805.806.405.906.105.906.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 85858585858585858585C, Cycle Length [s]
RCLRCLCLCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
5Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 41.4 23.0 23.0 41.0 37.9 37.9 41.1 33.1 23.1 41.4 28.2 21.9 Movement LOS D C C D D D D C C D C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 33.43 38.20 32.42 30.56
Approach LOS C D C C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 33.33
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.610
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 8.0 8.0 30.1 8.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 3421.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 34.83 34.83 17.69 34.83
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.204 2.192 2.625 2.495 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 709 709 1182 1182 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 17.69 17.69 7.10 7.10
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.919 2.195 2.828 2.276 Bicycle LOS A B C B
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
------------8765Ring 2
------------4321Ring 1
Sequence
6Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.026Volume to Capacity (v/c):

BLevel Of Service:

14.1Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

Two-way stopControl Type:

Intersection 2: A St/McCoy Ln
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesYesCrosswalk

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

35.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
McCoy LnA StA StName
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
7611361101122217761210811Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
1939303554193273Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Other Adjustment Factor

0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92Peak Hour Factor 701033100102020070119910Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor

7.007.007.007.007.007.007.007.007.007.007.007.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Base Volume Adjustment Factor 701033100102020070119910Base Volume Input [veh/h]
McCoy LnA StA StName
Volumes
7Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
BIntersection LOS

3.80d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBAAApproach LOS

10.7211.711.850.66d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]

8.698.695.923.073.073.070.000.004.210.000.320.6595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.350.350.240.120.120.120.000.000.170.000.010.0395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ABBABBAAAAAAMovement LOS

9.1914.112.99.2913.814.10.000.007.660.000.007.82d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]

0.080.030.070.010.000.030.000.000.050.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoNoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
0000Storage Area [veh]
NoNoFlared Lane
StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
8Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.535Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

21.9Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 3: Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
NoNoNoNoCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

40.0040.0055.0055.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Fairway DrSkyway DrSkyway DrName
Intersection Setup
9Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking
5411111672212323779312022641211Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1433425315919830516053Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Other Adjustment Factor

0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92Peak Hour Factor 5010101542011321873011020590194Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor

5.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Base Volume Adjustment Factor 5010101542011321873011020590194Base Volume Input [veh/h] Fairway DrSkyway DrSkyway DrName
Volumes
10Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

3.43.43.43.43.43.44.54.54.84.54.54.8l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 2626262626261717019190Pedestrian Clearance [s]
777777770770Walk [s]

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.02.04.04.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 565656565656575737575737Split [s]

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.02.01.01.02.0All red [s]

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
149Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
11Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

36.857.52120.9183.00251.265.80.0127.129.136.95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

1.470.304.843.3210.010.63.205.115.175.4795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

20.474.1867.1746.11150.161.44.471.071.875.950th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.820.172.691.846.036.461.782.842.873.0450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
CCCCCCCBBCLane Group LOS

22.6229.9826.5628.9522.322.032.214.214.230.3d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.200.060.580.430.800.790.740.430.430.82X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.420.202.381.423.363.072.470.550.542.48d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.150.150.150.150.040.150.150.04k, delay calibration

22.1929.7824.1827.5318.918.929.713.613.627.8d1, Uniform Delay [s] 326182324289622674162765774257c, Capacity [veh/h]
1592116515791304168182173180182173s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.040.010.120.090.290.290.070.180.180.12(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.210.210.210.210.370.370.090.420.420.15g / C, Green / Cycle 1414141425256292910g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.403.403.403.404.504.504.804.504.504.80l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.405.405.405.406.506.506.806.506.506.80L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 67676767676767676767C, Cycle Length [s]
CLCLCCLCCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
12Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 30.3 14.2 14.2 32.2 22.1 22.3 28.9 26.5 26.5 29.9 22.6 22.6 Movement LOS C B B C C C C C C C C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 18.10 23.21 27.50 23.68
Approach LOS B C C C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 21.93
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.535
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 23.55 23.55 23.55 23.55
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.959 3.198 2.258 2.028 Crosswalk LOS C C B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1500 1500 1503 1503 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 2.10 2.10 2.07 2.07
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.281 2.508 2.074 1.685 Bicycle LOS B B B A
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
-------------865Ring 2
-------------421Ring 1
Sequence
13Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
8/14/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 CM+P AM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 7 CM +P AMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
2219
Total
Volume
50 Right
10 Thru
10 Left
Westbound
154
Right
20 Thru
113
Left
Eastbound
218
Right
730
Thru
110
Left
Southbound
20 Right
590
Thru
194
Left
Northbound
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
Intersection NameID
543
Total
Volume
70 Right
10 Thru
33 Left
Westbound
10 Right
0 Thru
10 Left
Eastbound
20 Right
200
Thru
70 Left
Southbound
11 Right
99 Thru
10 Left
Northbound
A St/McCoy Ln2
Intersection NameID
1660
Total
Volume
20 Right
300
Thru
79 Left
Westbound
148
Right
440
Thru
120
Left
Eastbound
190
Right
133
Thru
30 Left
Southbound
46 Right
41 Thru
113
Left
Northbound
Betteravia Road/A Street1
Intersection NameID
14Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
A St/McCoy Ln
Betteravia Road/A Street
15Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 7: 7 CM +P AMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Intersection Analysis Summary
8/14/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 CM+P PM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 8 CM +P PMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

C25.80.467NB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedSkyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
C16.00.032EB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopA St/McCoy Ln2
D52.00.721EB LeftHCM 6th
EditionSignalizedBetteravia Road/A Street1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.721Volume to Capacity (v/c):

DLevel Of Service:

52.0Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 1: Betteravia Road/A Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
YesYesYesYesCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

45.0045.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Betteravia RdBetteravia RdA StA StName
Intersection Setup
2Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0100Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0011v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 1100v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking
3245762173691309223654371119167Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8114154317377561611183042Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Other Adjustment Factor

0.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.94Peak Hour Factor 3043058163650290210614067112157Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor

8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3043058163650290210614067112157Base Volume Input [veh/h] Betteravia RdBetteravia RdA StA StName
Volumes
3Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft]

20.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall
YesNoYesNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall

3.83.84.43.83.84.43.93.94.13.93.94.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 151502020000029290Pedestrian Clearance [s]
440440000440Walk [s]

4.04.02.04.04.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 565627565627363627363627Split [s]

1.01.02.01.01.02.01.51.52.01.51.52.0All red [s]

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
145Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
4Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

27.7461.78.1130.682.446.336.6054.04186.87205.3295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

1.1118.43.125.2427.317.813.462.167.478.2195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

15.4315.43.472.7499.300.216.0730.02103.81116.7250th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.6212.61.742.9119.912.08.641.204.154.6750th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoNoYesYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
CDECDFEDCDLane Group LOS

29.046.955.022.048.592.556.2254.1733.7452.45d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.070.890.680.280.941.020.920.550.420.85X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.108.863.310.3617.146.812.642.200.234.09d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.180.040.150.360.350.140.040.040.04k, delay calibration

28.938.051.721.631.345.743.5851.9733.5148.36d1, Uniform Delay [s] 4335119161173530431579451195c, Capacity [veh/h]
1511781691481781691566169516701695s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.020.260.040.120.390.180.180.030.110.10(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.290.290.050.410.410.180.200.050.270.12g / C, Green / Cycle 323264646202253013g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.803.804.403.803.804.403.904.103.904.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.805.806.405.805.806.405.906.105.906.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 111111111111111111111111111111C, Cycle Length [s]
RCLRCLCLCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
5Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 52.4 33.7 33.7 54.1 56.2 56.2 92.5 48.5 22.0 55.0 46.9 29.0 Movement LOS D C C D E E F D C E D C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 42.49 55.95 56.22 46.82
Approach LOS D E E D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 52.00
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.721
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 8.0 8.0 30.1 8.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 1422.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 47.91 47.91 29.60 47.91
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.237 2.295 2.863 2.639 Crosswalk LOS B B C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 541 541 902 902 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 29.60 29.60 16.76 16.75
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.149 2.106 3.495 2.469 Bicycle LOS B B C B
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
------------8765Ring 2
------------4321Ring 1
Sequence
6Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.032Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

16.0Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

Two-way stopControl Type:

Intersection 2: A St/McCoy Ln
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesYesCrosswalk

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

35.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
McCoy LnA StA StName
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
1201123111111111541202414811Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 3036333339306373Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Other Adjustment Factor

0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92Peak Hour Factor 1101021101010101421102213610Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor

8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1101021101010101421102213610Base Volume Input [veh/h]
McCoy LnA StA StName
Volumes
7Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
CIntersection LOS

4.82d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBAAApproach LOS

10.8613.653.330.46d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]

13.913.94.715.925.925.920.000.007.250.000.300.6195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

0.560.560.190.240.240.240.000.000.290.000.010.0295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ACBACCAAAAAAMovement LOS

9.6615.514.89.4615.416.00.000.007.900.000.007.65d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]

0.130.030.060.010.030.030.000.000.090.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoNoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
0000Storage Area [veh]
NoNoFlared Lane
StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
8Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with

0.467Volume to Capacity (v/c):

CLevel Of Service:

25.8Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:

HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:

SignalizedControl Type:

Intersection 3: Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
NoNoNoNoCurb Present

0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]

40.0040.0055.0055.00Speed [mph]

12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0Lane Width [ft] RighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftRighThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Fairway DrSkyway DrSkyway DrName
Intersection Setup
9Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ped/h] 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h]
000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h]
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking
2392233176221821017285411870126Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6058445452518214321732Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Other Adjustment Factor

0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92Peak Hour Factor 220203016220167936705010800116Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor

4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Base Volume Adjustment Factor 220203016220167936705010800116Base Volume Input [veh/h] Fairway DrSkyway DrSkyway DrName
Volumes
10Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
0Pedestrian Clearance [s]
0Pedestrian Walk [s]
0Pedestrian Signal Group
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

3.43.43.43.43.43.44.54.54.84.54.54.8l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 2626262626261717019190Pedestrian Clearance [s]
777777770770Walk [s]

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.02.04.04.02.0Vehicle Extension [s] 565656565656575737575737Split [s]

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.02.01.01.02.0All red [s]

0.00Lost time [s]
SingleBandPermissive Mode
Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference

0.0Offset [s]
Fully actuatedActuation Type
Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type
149Cycle Length [s]
-Signal Coordination Group
NoLocated in CBD
Intersection Settings
11Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
142.2119.15102.37134.46253.261.39.6256.257.95.295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

5.690.774.095.3810.110.41.5910.210.23.8195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]

79.0010.6456.8774.70151.157.22.0154.155.52.950th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]

3.160.432.272.996.086.320.886.186.212.1250th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoNoNoYesYesNoNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group
BCBCCCCCCDLane Group LOS

18.7421.7517.6229.6627.927.734.525.225.235.8d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh]

0.450.090.340.550.790.790.480.750.750.78X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s]

0.800.140.502.073.873.711.202.772.753.08d2, Incremental Delay [s]

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor

0.150.150.150.150.150.150.040.150.150.04k, delay calibration

17.9421.6217.1227.5924.024.033.322.422.432.7d1, Uniform Delay [s] 575384577329514537112586589162c, Capacity [veh/h]
1584116515901100176184175183184175s, saturation flow rate [veh/h]

0.160.030.120.170.230.230.030.240.240.07(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate

0.360.360.360.360.290.290.060.320.320.09g / C, Green / Cycle 272727272121524247g_i, Effective Green Time [s]

3.403.403.403.404.504.504.804.504.504.80l2, Clearance Lost Time [s]

0.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s]

5.405.405.405.406.506.506.806.506.506.80L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 74747474747474747474C, Cycle Length [s]
CLCLCCLCCLLane Group
Lane Group Calculations
12Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 35.8 25.2 25.2 34.5 27.8 27.9 29.6 17.6 17.6 21.7 18.7 18.7 Movement LOS D C C C C C C B B C B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 26.55 28.26 23.39 19.08
Approach LOS C C C B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 25.82
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.467
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 26.67 26.67 26.67 26.67
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.031 3.348 2.202 2.094 Crosswalk LOS C C B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1370 1370 1373 1373 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 3.65 3.65 3.62 3.62
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.390 2.288 2.187 2.045 Bicycle LOS B B B B
----------------Ring 4
----------------Ring 3
-------------865Ring 2
-------------421Ring 1
Sequence
13Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
8/14/2023Report File: G:\...\2023_08 CM+P PM (updated timings).pdf Scenario 8 CM +P PMVistro File: G:\...\2023_06_Base Scenario.vistro Santa Maria A Street Industrial
2358
Total
Volume
220
Right
20 Thru
30 Left
Westbound
162
Right
20 Thru
167
Left
Eastbound
93 Right
670
Thru
50 Left
Southbound
10 Right
800
Thru
116
Left
Northbound
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr3
Intersection NameID
601
Total
Volume
110
Right
10 Thru
21 Left
Westbound
10 Right
10 Thru
10 Left
Eastbound
10 Right
142
Thru
110
Left
Southbound
22 Right
136
Thru
10 Left
Northbound
A St/McCoy Ln2
Intersection NameID
2268
Total
Volume
30 Right
430
Thru
58 Left
Westbound
163
Right
650
Thru
290
Left
Eastbound
210
Right
61 Thru
40 Left
Southbound
67 Right
112
Thru
157
Left
Northbound
Betteravia Road/A Street1
Intersection NameID
14Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Skyway Dr/Fairway Dr
A St/McCoy Ln
Betteravia Road/A Street
15Central Coast Transportation Consulting
Scenario 8: 8 CM +P PMSanta Maria A Street Industrial
Version 2023 (SP 0-3)
Generated with
A
ugust 7, 2024
C
ody Graybehl Sent Via Email: [email protected] City of Santa Maria
Community Development Department
110 South Pine Street, #101
Santa Maria, California 93458
R
e: Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Comments on the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for A Street and Fairway Drive General Plan Amendment and Rezone, GPZ2023-0001
D
ear Cody Graybehl:

Th
e Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (District) has reviewed the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the referenced project, which consists of the General Plan Land Use Map Amendment and Zone Change to change the land use designation on a 6.95-acre parcel from A-AS (Airport-Airport Service) and OS (Open Space) to LI (Light Industrial) and M-1 (Light Manufacturing). The MND assesses the conceptual development of a 100,000 square foot industrial or manufacturing development. No development project application has been submitted. The subject property is identified in the Assessor Parcel Map Book as APN 111-231-016 and is located at the corner of A Street and Fairway Drive in the City of Santa Maria.

D
istrict Staff have the following comments on the Draft MND:

1. T
rip Generation Rate Discrepancy: The motor vehicle trip emission estimates in Section 3, Air Quality and Section 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions of the MND were calculated using the trip generation rate provided in the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Study and associated CalEEMod analysis (Appendix A). However, the assumptions used in the Air Q
uality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Study are different than the trip generation rate provided in the Draft Transportation Impact Study (Appendix D). The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Study assumes the project would generate 174 vehicle trips per day; w
hile the Transportation Study identifies that the project would generate 579 vehicle trips per day. The trip rate difference appears to be related to the land use type that was assumed in each analysis, with the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Study assuming the project’s l
and use type as an “unrefrigerated warehouse no rail” land use and the Transportation Study assuming the project type as a “manufacturing” land use. Additionally, the Transportation Study is referencing trip generations rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual’s 11th Addition, while the trip generation rates built into CalEEMod refer to the 10th Edition. Note that Section 17, Transportation of the MND utilizes the trip generation rates from the Transportation Impact Study and the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th edition trip rates for manufacturing. We recommend that the air quality and greenhouse gas emission estimates included in the MND be revised based on the more conservative trip rate identified in the Transportation Impact Study.

Appendix E - Public Comments
District Comments on A Street and Fairway Drive General Plan Amendment and Rezone, GPZ2023-0001 August 7, 2024

Page 2 ends

2. Greenhouse Gas Discussion: Page 37 of the MND states that the purpose of the greenhouse gas emissions study is to estimate greenhouse gas emissions from the proposed project and “compare the estimate to the SBCAPCD greenhouse gas regulations.” The regulations discussed in the greenhouse gas study are not the District’s regulations, and as the document discusses, the District does not have a board-adopted greenhouse gas thresholds that would apply to this project type. Therefore, please revise the discussion to reference the accurate significance criteria used for this project which appears to be consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan and SBCAG 2050 RTP/SCS.

If you or the project applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact me at (805) 979-8334 or via email at [email protected].

Sincerely,

Emily Waddington,
Air Quality Specialist
Planning Division

cc: Planning Chron File

RRM Design Group Responses to Comments on the Draft MND Santa Maria Airport Rezoning Project
1 Letter 1
COMMENTER: Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD) DATE: August 7, 2024
Response 1.1
In the comment letter provided on August 7, 2024, the Draft Transportation Impact Study noted that the project would generate 579 vehicle trips per day. However, the MND used trip generation rates from the CalEEMod analysis, which estimated 174 vehicle trips per day.

The trip generation rates and land use category in CalEEMod were adjusted to align with the findings of the Draft Transportation Impact Study, which reported 579 daily vehicle trips and uses the manufacturing land use category. Revisions in the MND are provided below (underline is added text, strikethrough is removed text).

2.1 Revisions to the Draft MND
Section 3 – Air Quality

Page 20 ends

Maximum Daily Emissions (pounds per day)
Emissions Source ROC NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Area 3 <1 4 <1 <1 <1
Energy <1 1<1 1<1 <1 <1 <1
Mobile 21 21 144 <1 31 1<1
Total 54 31 198 <1 31 1<1
Threshold (area +
energy + mobile) 240 240 N/A N/A 80 N/A
Threshold Exceeded? No No N/A N/A No N/A
Threshold (mobile only) 25 25 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Threshold Exceeded? No No N/A N/A N/A N/A
ROC = reactive organic compounds, NOX = nitrogen oxides, CO = carbon monoxide, SO2 = sulfur dioxide, PM10 = particulate matter 10 microns in diameter or less, PM2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter; lbs/day = pounds per day Notes: All emissions modeling was completed using CalEEMod. See Appendix A for modeling results. Some numbers may not add up due to rounding. Emission data is pulled from “mitigated” results, which account for compliance with regulations (including SBCAPCD Rule 323.1) and project design features. Emissions presented are the highest of the winter and summer modeled emissions.

RRM Design Group Responses to Comments on the Draft MND Santa Maria Airport Rezoning Project

2 Section 8 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Page 38 ends

Table 8 summarizes combined annual GHG emissions generated by project construction and operation based on the CalEEMod output files in Appendix A. The combined annual GHG emissions from the project would be approximately 763 365 MT of CO2e per year .

Emission Source Annual Emissions (MT of CO2e per year)
Construction 17
Operational 746 348
Mobile 338 142
Area 1
Energy 337 149
Water 26
Waste 39 29
Refrigerant 4
Total Emissions 763 365
MT = metric tons; CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalents
Notes: Numbers may not add up due to rounding.

See Appendix A for modeling results.

Response 1.2
The commenter points out that page 37 of the MND indicates that the purpose of estimating greenhouse gas emissions is to compare emission estimates to SBCAPCD’s greenhouse gas regulations. However, the significance criteria for the project should be based on consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan and SBCAG 2050 RTP/SCS.

In the MND, the impact of greenhouse gases was assessed based on the project's alignment with the 2022 Scoping Plan and SBCAG 2050 RTP/SCS. The statement "compare the estimate to the SBCAPCD greenhouse gas regulation" in the MND is an error. Revisions to the MND are as follows.

Section 8 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Page 37 ends

“…. The purpose of this analysis is to estimate estimating greenhouse gas emissions is for informational purposes. that would be emitted by the proposed project manufacturing or industrial project (up to 100,000 square feet of development) that would be enabled by the GPZ and compare the estimate to the SBCAPCD greenhouse gas regulations”.

RRM Design Group Responses to Comments on the Draft MND Santa Maria Airport Rezoning Project
3 This page intentionally left blank.

Gavin Newsom, Governor
David Shabazian, Director

State of California Natural Resources Agency | Department of Conservation Northern District
Orcutt Office and Mail: 195 S. Broadway, Suite 101, Orcutt, CA 93455 | T: (805) 937 -7246 | F: (805) 937 -0673 Sacramento Office and Mail: 715 P Street, MS 180 3, Sacramento, CA 95814 | T: (916) 322-1110 | F: (916) 445-3319 Ventura Office: 1000 S. Hill Road, Suite 116, Ventura, CA 93003 | T: (805) 937 -7246 | F: (805) 654-4765 Ventura Mail: 195 S. Broadway, Suite 101, Orcutt, CA 93455 conservation.ca.gov

August 6, 2024

VIA EMAIL

Mr. Cody Grahbehl
Community Development Department
City of Santa Maria
110 South Pine Street, #101
Santa Maria, CA 93458
[email protected]

Dear Mr. Graybehl:

A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONE GPZ2023-001

The California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) appreciates the opportunity to submit comments on the project referenced above (Project).

CalGEM’s authority is set forth in Division 3 of the Public Resources Code (PRC), and of the California Code of Regulations, title 14, (CCR). PRC section 3208.1 establishes well re-abandonment responsibility when a previously plugged and abandoned well may be impacted by planned property development or construction activities. Local permitting agencies, property owners, and/or developers should be aware of, and fully understand, that significant and potentially dangerous issues may be associated with development near oil, gas, or geothermal wells.

CalGEM has reviewed the Project. To assist local permitting agencies, property owners, and developers in making wise land use decisions regarding potential development near oil, gas, or geothermal wells, CalGEM provides the following information.

Our records indicate there are no oil, gas, or geothermal wells located in the proposed land use change area. For comment and well review for future development on parcels where wells are located, please contact CalGEM. Records and locations for oil, gas, and geothermal wells located in California are available online at https://www.conservation.ca.gov/calgem/Pages/WellFinder.aspx

CalGEM categorically advises against building over, or in any way impeding access to oil, gas, or geothermal wells. Access is considered the ability for a well servicing unit and associated necessary equipment to reach a well from a public street or access way, solely over the parcel on which the well is located. A well servicing unit, and any necessary equipment, should be able to pass unimpeded along and over the route, and should be able to access the well without disturbing the integrity of surrounding Docusign Envelope ID: 9298453C-15FA-4928-BA27-5D240971EEA4 Mr. Cody Graybehl
August 6, 2024

Page 2 of 4 ends

infrastructure. Items that can affect well access include, but are not limited to, buildings, housing, fencing, hardscape, landscape, trees, pools, patios, sidewalks, roadways, parking lots, waterways or channels, and decking. Impeding access to a well could result in the need to remove any structure or obstacle that prevents or impedes access.

There are no guarantees a well abandoned in compliance with current CalGEM requirements will not start leaking in the future. It always remains a possibility that any well may start to leak oil, gas, and/or water after abandonment, no matter how thoroughly the well was plugged and abandoned. CalGEM acknowledges wells plugged and abandoned to the most current standards have a lower probability of leaking in the future, however there is no guarantee that such abandonments will not leak.

CalGEM advises that all wells identified on development parcels prior to, or during, development activities be tested for liquid and gas leakage. Surveyed locations should be provided to CalGEM in Latitude and Longitude, NAD 83 decimal format. CalGEM expects any wells found leaking to be reported to it immediately.

PRC section 3208.1 gives CalGEM the authority to order or permit the re-abandonment of any well where it has reason to question the integrity of the previous abandonment, or if the well is not accessible or visible. Failure to plug and re- abandon a well may result in enforcement action, including an order to perform re-abandonment well work, pursuant to PRC section 3208.1, and 3224. Responsibility for re-abandonment costs may be affected by the choices made by the local permitting agency, property owner, and/or developer in considering the general advice set forth in this letter. The PRC continues to define the person or entity responsible for re-abandonment as:

1. The property owner - If the well was plugged and abandoned in conformance with CalGEM requirements at the time of plugging and abandonment, and in its current condition does not pose an immediate danger to life, health, and property, but requires additional work solely because the owner of the property on which the well is located proposes construction on the property that would prevent or impede access to the well for purposes of remedying a currently perceived future problem, then the owner of the property on which the well is located shall obtain all rights necessary to re-abandon the well and be responsible for the re-abandonment.

2. The person or entity causing construction over or near the well - If the well was plugged and abandoned in conformance with CalGEM requirements at the time of plugging and abandonment, and the property owner, developer, or local agency permitting the construction failed either to obtain an opinion from the supervisor or district deputy as to whether the previously abandoned well is required to be re-abandoned, or to follow the advice of the supervisor or district deputy not to undertake the construction, then the person or entity causing the Docusign Envelope ID: 9298453C-15FA-4928-BA27-5D240971EEA4 Mr. Cody Graybehl
August 6, 2024

Page 3 of 4 ends

construction over or near the well shall obtain all rights necessary to re-abandon the well and be responsible for the re-abandonment.

3. The party or parties responsible for disturbing the integrity of the abandonment - If the well was plugged and abandoned in conformance with CalGEM requirements at the time of plugging and abandonment, and after that time someone other than the operator or an affiliate of the operator disturbed the integrity of the abandonment in the course of developing the property, then the party or parties responsible for disturbing the integrity of the abandonment shall be responsible for the re-abandonment.

To view PRC section 3208.1 in its entirety, please visit:
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/index/Documents/CALGEM-SR-1%20Web%20Copy.pdf

No well work may be performed on any oil, gas, or geothermal well without written approval from CalGEM. Well work requiring written approval includes, but is not limited to, mitigating leaking gas or other fluids from abandoned wells, modifications to well casings, and/or any other abandonment or re-abandonment work. CalGEM also regulates the top of a plugged and abandoned well’s minimum and maximum depth below final grade. CCR section 1723.5 states well casings shall be cut off at least 5 feet but no more than 10 feet below grade. If any well needs to be lowered or raised (i.e., casing cut down or casing riser added) to meet this regulation, a permit from CalGEM is required before work can start.

CalGEM makes the following additional recommendations to the local permitting agency, property owner, and developer:

1. To ensure that present and future property owners are aware of (a) the existence of all wells located on the property, and (b) potentially significant issues associated with any improvements near oil or gas wells, CalGEM recommends that information regarding any identified well(s), and any other pertinent information obtained after the issuance of this letter, be communicated to the appropriate county recorder for inclusion in the title information of the subject real property.

2. CalGEM recommends that any soil containing hydrocarbons be disposed of in accordance with local, state, and federal laws. Please notify the appropriate authorities if soil containing significant amounts of hydrocarbons is discovered during development.

As indicated in PRC section 3106, CalGEM has jurisdictional authority over the drilling, operation, maintenance, and abandonment of oil, gas, and geothermal wells, and attendant facilities, to prevent, as far as possible, damage to life, health, property, and natural resources, damage to underground oil, gas, and geothermal deposits, and damage to underground and surface waters suitable for irrigation or domestic purposes. In addition to CalGEM’s authority to order work on wells pursuant to PRC section 3208.1 and 3224, it has authority to issue civil and criminal penalties under PRC Docusign Envelope ID: 9298453C-15FA-4928-BA27-5D240971EEA4 Mr. Cody Graybehl
August 6, 2024

Page 4 of 4 ends

section 3236, 3236.5, and 3359 for violations within the CalGEM’s jurisdictional authority.

CalGEM does not regulate grading, excavations, or other land use issues.

If during development activities any wells are encountered that were not part of a construction site well review, a CalGEM engineer in the Northern District - Orcutt office is to be notified immediately, and an amended site plan with well casing diagrams for CalGEM review shall be filed. After appropriate review, the Orcutt CalGEM office will send a follow-up well evaluation letter to the property owner, applicant, and local permitting agency.

Thank you for considering CalGEM’s comments. If you have any questions, please contact our CalGEM office at (805) 937-7246 or via email at
[email protected]

Sincerely,

Trey Powell
Northern District Deputy

ZN:ji:kv

cc: Chrono
CSWR
[email protected]

Docusign Envelope ID: 9298453C-15FA-4928-BA27-5D240971EEA4

Attachment D
Mitigation Monitoring Program

CITY OF SANTA MARIA

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM

PROJECT NAME: A Street and Fairway Drive_____________________________________

APPROVAL DATE: _____________________________ FILE NUMBERS: GPZ2023-0001

Mitigated Negative Declaration for the A Street and Fairway Project (SCH# 2024070374)

The following environmental mitigation measures were incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this project in order to mitigate identified environmental impacts. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that this mitigation measure has been complied with and implemented and fulfills the City's monitoring requirements with respect to Assembly Bill 3180 (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6).

ADMINISTRATION
The City of Santa Maria (City) is the Lead Agency responsible for the adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP). The applicant, RRM on behalf of the Santa Maria Public Airport District, is responsible for implementation of the MMP, in coordination with the City and other identified entities. According to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15097(a), a public agency may delegate reporting or monitoring responsibilities to another public agency or to a private entity that accepts the delegation. The City may delegate responsibility for verifying and documenting compliance with the MMP to RRM on behalf of the Santa Maria Public Airport District as coordinator of the project and its construction, and RRM will be responsible for compliance.

However, until mit igation measures have been completed, the Lead Agency remains responsible for ensuring that the implementation of the measures occurs in accordance with the program.

MITIGATION MEASURES
The following table is structured to enable quick reference to mitigat ion measures and the associated monitoring program based on the environmental resource. The numbering of mitigation measures correlates with numbering of measures found in Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration.

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROJECT GPZ2023-0001 A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GPZ PROJECT PAGE 2 OF 14
Mitigation Measure/
Condition of Approval
Action
Required
When
Monitoring
to Occur
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments

AIR QUALITY
AQ-1 Construction Emissions Control
Measures. The project applicant shall install the
following air pollutant emissions control measures
throughout the construction period:

Dust Control Measures
During construction, the applicant shall implement all
of the applicable measures from the following list as
standard dust control measures to avoid impacts
associated with fugitive dust emissions:
a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to
keep all areas of vehicle movement damp
enough to prevent dust from leaving the site
and from exceeding the APCD’s limit of 20%
opacity for greater than 3 minutes in any 60-
minute period. At a minimum, this should
include wetting down such areas in the late
morning and after work is completed for the
day. Increased watering frequency should
be required whenever the wind speed
exceeds 15 mph. Reclaimed water should
be used whenever possible. However,
reclaimed water should not be used in or
around crops for human consumption.
b. Minimize amount of disturbed area and
reduce on site vehicle speeds to 15 mph or
less.
c. If importation, exportation and stockpiling of
fill material is involved, soil stockpiled for
more than two days shall be covered, kept
moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent
dust generation. Trucks transporting fill
material to and from the site shall be tarped
from the point of origin.

Implement
and show
dust control
measures on
plans
During
demolition,
ground
disturbance,
and
construction
activities
Regular (bi-
weekly) spot
checks, or
as
determined
necessary
by City
City of Santa
Maria,
Construction
Contractor

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROJECT GPZ2023-0001 A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GPZ PROJECT PAGE 3 OF 14
Mitigation Measure/
Condition of Approval
Action
Required
When
Monitoring
to Occur
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
d. Gravel pads shall be installed at all access
points to prevent tracking of mud onto public
roads.
e. After clearing, grading, earth moving or
excavation is completed, treat the disturbed
area by watering, or revegetating, or by
spreading soil binders until the area is paved
or otherwise developed so that dust
generation will not occur.
f. Schedule clearing, grading, earthmoving,
and excavation activities during periods of
low wind speed to the extent feasible. During
periods of high winds (>25 mph) clearing,
grading, earthmoving, and excavation
operations shall be minimized to prevent
fugitive dust created by onsite operations
from becoming a nuisance or hazard.
g. The contractor or builder shall d esignate a
person or persons to monitor the dust control
program and to order increased watering, as
necessary, to prevent transport of dust
offsite. Their duties shall include holiday and
weekend periods when work may not be in
progress. The name and tele phone number
of such persons shall be provided to the
APCD prior to land use clearance for map
recordation and land use clearance for finish
grading of the structure.

Equipment Emissions Control Measures
During project grading and construction, the
applicant shall adhere to the following measures to
reduce NO X and PM 2.5 emissions from construction
equipment:
a. All portable diesel -powered construction
equipment shall be registered with the
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROJECT GPZ2023-0001 A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GPZ PROJECT PAGE 4 OF 14
Mitigation Measure/
Condition of Approval
Action
Required
When
Monitoring
to Occur
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
state’s portable equipment registration
program OR shall obtain an APCD permit.
b. Fleet owners of mobile construction
equipment are subject to the CARB
Regulation for In -use Off -road Diesel
Vehicles (Title 13 California Code of
Regulations, Chapter 9, § 2449), the
purpose of which is to reduce diesel PM and
criteria poll utant emissions from in -use
(existing) off-road diesel-fueled vehicles. For
more information, please refer to the CARB
website at
www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/ordiesel/ordiesel.ht
m.
c. All commercial diesel vehicles are subject to
Title 13, § 2485 of the California Code of
Regulations, limiting engine idling time.

Idling of heavy -duty diesel construction
equipment and trucks during loading and
unloading shall be limited to five minutes;
electric auxiliary power units should be used
whenever possible.
d. Diesel construc tion equipment meeting the
CARB Tier 3 or higher emission standards
for off-road heavy-duty diesel engines shall
be used to the maximum extent feasible.
e. Diesel powered equipment should be
replaced by electric equipment whenever
feasible.
f. If feasible, dies el construction equipment
shall be equipped with selective catalytic
reduction systems, diesel oxidation catalysts
and diesel particulate filters as certified
and/or verified by EPA or California.
g. Catalytic converters shall be installed on
gasoline-powered equipment, if feasible.

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROJECT GPZ2023-0001 A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GPZ PROJECT PAGE 5 OF 14
Mitigation Measure/
Condition of Approval
Action
Required
When
Monitoring
to Occur
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
h. All construction equipment shall be
maintained in tune per the manufacturer’s
specifications.
i. The engine size of construction equipment
shall be the minimum practical size.
j. The number of construction equipment
operating simultaneously shall be minimized
through efficient management practices to
ensure that the smallest practical number is
operating at any one time.

Fugitive Dust Control
The project applicant shall comply with SBCAPCD’s
Rule 345: Control of Fugitive Dust from Construction
and Demolition Activities including all applicable
standards and measures therein.

Diesel-fired Engine Permits
All portable diesel-fired construction engines rated at 50 brake horsepower (bhp) or greater must have
either statewide Portable Equipme nt Registration
Program (PERP) certificates or SBCAPCD permits
prior to grading/building permit issuance.

Construction engines with PERP certificates are
exempt from SBCAPCD permit, provided they will be
onsite for less than 12 months.

Permit to Operate
If contaminated soils are found at the project site,
SBCAPCD must be contacted to determine if ATC
and/or Permit to Operate permits shall be required.
(SBCAPCD permits are required for all soil vapor
extraction activities. SBCAPCD permits are also
required for the excavation, or “dig -and-haul,” of
more than 1,000 cubic yards of contaminated soils.)

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROJECT GPZ2023-0001 A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GPZ PROJECT PAGE 6 OF 14
Mitigation Measure/
Condition of Approval
Action
Required
When
Monitoring
to Occur
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
Equipment Idling Requirements
At all times, idling of heavy-duty diesel trucks should be minimized; auxiliary power units should be used
whenever possible. State law requires that:
 Drivers of diesel -fueled commercial
vehicles shall not idle the vehicle's
primary diesel engine for greater
than five minutes at any location.
 Drivers of diesel -fueled commercial
vehicles shall not idle a diesel-fueled
auxiliary power system (APS) for
more than five minutes to power a
heater, air conditioner, or any
ancillary equipment on the vehicle.

Trucks with 2007 or newer model
year engines must meet additional
requirements (verified clean APS
label required). See
www.arb.ca.gov/noidle for more
information.

Asphalt Paving Requirements
Asphalt paving activities shall comply with APCD
Rule 329, Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt Paving
Materials.

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
BIO-1: Nesting Birds Impact Avoidance and
Minimization

The following actions are recommended to avoid
potential impacts to nesting birds:
 A nesting bird survey should be conducted
by a qualified biologist no more than two
weeks prior to the onset of construction
activities. The nesting bird survey should be
conducted within any and all suitable habitat
Verify pre-
construction
surveys have
been
conducted,
and if
necessary, no-
disturbance
buffers have
been
demarcated.

Surveys will be
verified no
sooner than
two weeks
prior to
construction
activities. If
nests are
found, City will
verify that a
biologist shall
Once. If nests
are found, as
deemed
necessary by
the City
Community
Development
Department.

City of Santa
Maria
Community
Development
Department

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROJECT GPZ2023-0001 A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GPZ PROJECT PAGE 7 OF 14
Mitigation Measure/
Condition of Approval
Action
Required
When
Monitoring
to Occur
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
that occurs within the project site, within 300
feet of its immediate vicinity for raptors, and
100 feet for all other bird species (as is
feasible). If no active nests are found, no
further mitigation would be required.
 If active bird nests are found, then an
appropriately sized avoidance buffer should
be established by the biologist and all
construction work within the buffer should be
delayed until after the nesting season has
ended or until the biologist has determined
that the adults and young are no longer
reliant on the nest site for survival.
 Limits of construction to avoid the nest shall
be established in the field with flagging and
stakes or construction fencing. Construction
personnel shall be instructed on the
sensitivity of the area.

Plan Requirements and Timing.

The results of the surveys shall be reported to the
City Community Development Department prior to
issuance of grading permits. No disturbance buffers
shall be demarcated in the field (e.g., fencing,
flagging) prior to initiation of construction activities in the vicinity of an active nest.

Monitoring.

The City Community Development Department staff
will verify that a pre-construction nesting bird survey has been conducted, if required based on
construction timing, and shall verify that no
disturbance avoidance buffers have been established
prior to issuance of a grading permit. The approved
biologist shall be responsible for monitoring active
nests, if any occur.

conduct
monitoring
until all young
have fledged.

If required, no-
disturbance
buffers will be
confirmed prior
to issuance of
grading
permits.

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROJECT GPZ2023-0001 A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GPZ PROJECT PAGE 8 OF 14
Mitigation Measure/
Condition of Approval
Action
Required
When
Monitoring
to Occur
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
BIO-2: California Red-legged Frog Impact
Avoidance
The following actions are recommended to avoid
potential impacts to CRLF:
 A pre-construction survey of the
proposed project site for CLRF shall
be conducted by a qualified biologist
within 48 hours prior to the start of
project construction to confirm this
species is not present in the work
area.
 A qualified biological monitor familiar
with CRLF will monitor all initial site
disturbance (clearing, grubbing,
rough grading).
 In the event the pre-construction
survey or the onsite monitor
identifies the presence of individuals
of CRLF prior to or during
construction, then all work shall stop
until the CRLF leave the site of their
own accord. If CRLF do not move off
site on their own, the project
proponent shall comply with all
relevant requirements of a take
authorization under the federal
Endangered Species Act prior to
resuming project activities.

Plan Requirements and Timing.

Measure to be
added to
project plans
prior to
finalization.

Survey to be
conducted 48
hours prior to
construction.

Monitoring
shall be
conducted
during ground
disturbance
and results
shall be
submitted to
the City prior
to construction
activity. In the
event CRLF
are
encountered,
the City shall
coordinate
with the
USFWS on
obtaining take
authorization
or a no-take
concurrence
finding prior to
construction.

Prior to
construction
activity.

Survey
completed 48
hours prior to
construction.

Monitoring to
be performed
during all
initial ground
disturbing
activity.

City of Santa
Maria
Community
Development
Department
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROJECT GPZ2023-0001 A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GPZ PROJECT PAGE 9 OF 14
Mitigation Measure/
Condition of Approval
Action
Required
When
Monitoring
to Occur
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
Monitoring.

The City Community Development Department staff
will verify that a pre-construction survey has been
conducted, if required based on construction timing,
and shall verify that no disturbance avoidance buffers
have been established prior to issuance of a grading
permit. The approved biologist shall be responsible
for monitoring all site disturbances.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 and
BIO-2 would reduce potential impacts to special-
status species to less than significant; therefore,
potential impacts related to special status wildlife
would be less than significant with mitigation.

CULTURAL RESOURCES
CR-1 Inadvertent Discovery of Archaeological
Resources. In the event that any cultural resource
is encountered during subsurface earthwork
activities associated with development of the project
site, all construction activities within a 100-foot
radius of the find shall cease and the City shall be
notified immediately. Work shall not continue until a
qualified archaeologist, in conjunction with locally
affiliated Native American representative(s) as
necessary, determines whether the uncovered
resource requires further study. Any previously
unidentified resources found during construction
shall be recorded on appropriate California
Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523
Series forms and evaluated for significance in terms
of CEQA criteria by a qualified archaeologist.

Potentially significant cultural resources consist of,
but are not limited to, stone, bone, glass, ceramic,
wood, or shell artifacts; fossils; or features including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites.

Notify City if
applicable
During
subsurface
earthwork
activities
N/A City of Santa
Maria,
Construction
contractor

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROJECT GPZ2023-0001 A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GPZ PROJECT PAGE 10 OF 14
Mitigation Measure/
Condition of Approval
Action
Required
When
Monitoring
to Occur
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
If the resource is determined significant under
CEQA, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare and
implement a research design and archaeological
data recovery plan, in conjunction with locally
affiliated Native American representative(s) as
necessary that will capture those categories of data
for which the site is significant. The archaeologist
shall also perform appropriate technical analysis,
prepare a comprehensive report, and file it with the
Central Coast Information Center, located at the
University of California, Santa Barbara, and provide
for the permanent curation of the recovered
materials. These actions would reduce impacts to a
less than significant level.

CR-2 Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains.

In the event that human remains are exposed
during subsurface earthwork activities associated
with development of the project, an immediate halt
work order shall be issued, and the City Community
Development Department shall be notified. State
Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires
that no further disturbance of the site or any nearby
area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent
human remains shall occur until the County Coroner
has made the necessary findings as to origin and
disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. If the
remains are determined to be of Native American
descent, the coroner shall notify the Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24
hours. These protocols shall be detailed on project
grading and construction plans for all development
on-site. These actions would reduce impacts to a
less than significant level.

Notify City if
applicable
During
subsurface
earthwork
activities
N/A City of Santa
Maria,
Construction
contractor

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROJECT GPZ2023-0001 A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GPZ PROJECT PAGE 11 OF 14
Mitigation Measure/
Condition of Approval
Action
Required
When
Monitoring
to Occur
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments

GEOLOGY AND SOILS
GEO-1 Inadvertent Discovery of Paleontological
Resources. Should any vertebrate
fossils or potentially significant finds (e.g., numerous well-preserved invertebrate or plant
fossils) be encountered during work on-site, all
activities in the immediate vicinity of the find
shall cease until a qualified paleontologist evaluates
the find for its scientific value. If deemed
significant, the paleontological resource(s) shall be
salvaged and deposited in an accredited
and permanent scientific institution where they will be properly curated and preserved.

These actions would reduce impacts to a less than
significant level.

Notify City if
applicable
During
subsurface
earthwork
activities
N/A City of Santa
Maria,
Construction
contractor

HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
HAZ-1 Stop Work Procedure. If during
construction of a future project enabled by the GPZ,
visual contamination or chemical odors are detected,
work will be stopped immediately and the Santa
Barbara County Fire Department Hazardous
Materials Unit (HMU) will be contacted. Resumption
of work will require the approval of HMU. In the event
that previously unknown oil or gas wells and/or
associated equipment is discovered, CalGEM shall
be contacted immediately to assess the equipment.

Recommendations of CalGEM to address the
discovered equ ipment shall be implemented. At
minimum CalGEM shall be notified regarding the oil
well identified on the CalGEM GIS website.

Notify City
and HMU if
applicable
During
ground
disturbing
activity and
construction
N/A City of Santa
Maria,
Construction
contractor

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROJECT GPZ2023-0001 A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GPZ PROJECT PAGE 12 OF 14
Mitigation Measure/
Condition of Approval
Action
Required
When
Monitoring
to Occur
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
NOISE
NOI-1 During construction of any future
development within the project parcel, construction
activity shall be limited to the hours between 7:00
a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, and between 8:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays in accordance with
the General Plan Noise Element. No construction
shall occur on Sundays or federal or state holidays.

Construction equipment maintenance shall be limited
to the same hours.

These
measures
shall be shown
on grading and
building plans
and
implemented
prior to issuance
of grading or
building permits,
and during
project
construction
activities
During project
construction
activities.

Once

City of Santa
Maria
Community
Development
Department

NOI-2 The applicant shall implement the following
measures during construction of the project:
 Mufflers. Construction equipment shall be
properly maintained and all internal
combustion engine driven machinery with
intake and exhaust mufflers and engine
shrouds, as applicable, shall be in good
condition and appropriate for the equipment.

During construction, all equipment, fixed or
mobile, shall be operated with closed
engine doors and shall be equipped with
properly operating and maintained mufflers,
consistent with manufacturers’ standards.
 Electrical Power. Electrical power, rather
than diesel equipment, shall be used to run
compressors and similar power tools and to
power any temporary structures, such as
construction trailers or caretaker facilities.
 Equipment Staging. All stationary
equipment shall be staged as far away from
the adjacent offices as feasible.

These
measures
shall be shown
on grading and
building plans
and
implemented
prior to
issuance of
grading or
building
permits, and
during project
construction
activities.

During project
construction
activities.

Once

City of Santa
Maria
Community
Development
Department

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROJECT GPZ2023-0001 A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GPZ PROJECT PAGE 13 OF 14
Mitigation Measure/
Condition of Approval
Action
Required
When
Monitoring
to Occur
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
 Equipment Idling. Construction vehicles and
equipment shall not be left idling for longer
than five minutes when not in use.
 Workers’ Radios. All noise from workers’
radios shall be controlled to a point that they
are not audible at the adjacent offices near
construction activity.
 Smart Back-up Alarms. Mobile construction
equipment shall have smart back-up alarms
that automatically adjust the sound level of
the alarm in response to ambient noise
levels. Alternatively, back-up alarms shall
be disabled and replaced with human
spotters to ensure safety when mobile
construction equipment is moving in the
reverse direction.
 Disturbance Coordinator. The applicant
shall designate a disturbance coordinator
who shall be responsible for responding to
any local complaints about construction
noise. The noise disturbance coordinator
shall determine the cause of the noise
complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad
muffler, etc.) and shall require that
reasonable measures warranted to correct
the problem be implemented. A telephone
number for the disturbance coordinator shall
be conspicuously posted at the construction
site.

TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
TCR-1 Inadvertent Discovery of Tribal Cultural
Resource. In the event that a potentially significant
tribal cultural resource is encountered during
subsurface earthwork activities, all construction
activities within a 100-foot radius of the find shall
Notify City if
applicable
During
subsurface
earthwork
activities
N/A City of Santa
Maria,
Construction
contractor

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROJECT GPZ2023-0001 A STREET AND FAIRWAY DRIVE GPZ PROJECT PAGE 14 OF 14
Mitigation Measure/
Condition of Approval
Action
Required
When
Monitoring
to Occur
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
cease and the City shall be notified immediately.

Work shall not continue until a qualified
archaeologist, in conjunction with locally affiliated
Native American representative(s) as necessary,
determines whether the uncovered resource requires
further study. Any previously unidentified resources
found during construction shall be recorded on
appropriate California Department of Parks and
Recreation (DPR) forms and evaluated for
significance in terms of CEQA criteria by a qualified
archaeologist. Potentially significant cultural
resources consist of, but are not limited to, stone,
bone, glass, ceramic, wood, or shell artifacts; fossils; or features including hearths, structural remains, or
historic dumpsites.

If the resource is determined significant under CEQA,
the qualified archaeologist shall prepare and
implement a research design and archaeological
data recovery plan, in conjunction with locally
affiliated Native American representative(s) as
necessary that will capture those categories of data
for which the site is significant. The archaeologist
shall also perform appropriate technical analysis,
prepare a comprehensive report, and file it with the
CCIC, located at the University of California, Santa
Barbara, and provide for the permanent curation of
the recovered materials.

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA

MARIA, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM

PREPARED FOR THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE POLICY MAP

AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE FOR THE SANTA MARIA PUBLIC
AIRPORT DISTRICT PROJECT, LOCATED AT 1494 FAIRWAY DRIVE

WHEREAS, the applicant, RRM Design Group on behalf of the Santa Maria Public Airport District, initiated a General Plan Land Use Map Amendment and Zone Change (GPZ2023-0001) to amend the General Plan Land Use Policy Map and Zoning Map from A-AS (Airport -Airport Service) and the zone district of OS (Open Space) to LI (Light Industrial) land use designation and PD/M-1 (Planned Development/Light Manufacturing) zone district on a 6.95-acre site, herein referred to as the Project; and

WHEREAS, the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et. seq., as amended, require the evaluation of environmental impacts of said projects; and

WHEREAS, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment C of the City Council Agenda Report for November 19, 2024, incorporated herein by reference) was prepared for said Project; the required notices were published and the Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for public review, sent to every responsible agency with jurisdiction over the project, and placed in a public location; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City held a regularly scheduled public hearing on November 6, 2024, for the purpose of receiving evidence and considering the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration and the proposed Project; and

WHEREAS, after con sidering all evidence, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project; and

WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment C of the City Council Agenda Report dated November 19, 2024), incorporated herein by reference for the Project; and

WHEREAS, there is no sub stantial evidence in the whole record before the City Council supporting a fair argument that the project as described in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration with the incorporated mitigations will have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, at the completion of the public hearing, the City Council duly considered all evidence presented at said hearing; and

2 WHEREAS, the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program reflects the City Council’s independent judgment and analysis.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorp orated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council adopt s the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment C of the City Council Agenda Report dated
November 19, 2024, incorporated herein by reference) for the General Plan Land Use Map Amendment and Zone Change,
located at 1494 Fairway Drive.

Section 3. The City Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment D of the Ci ty Council Agenda Report dated
November 19, 2024, incorporated herein by reference) for the General Plan Land Use Map Amendment and Zone Change,
located at 1494 Fairway Drive.

Section 4. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 19th day of November 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
City Manager

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA

MARIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND

USE POLICY MAP FOR THE SANTA MARIA PUBLIC AIRPORT
DISTRICT (GPZ2023-0001) ON 6.95 ACRES LOCATED AT
1494 FAIRWAY DRIVE FROM A-AS (AIRPORT-AIRPORT

SERVICE) TO LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)

WHEREAS, the applicant, RRM Design Group on behalf of the Santa Maria Public Airport District, initiated a General Plan Land Use amendment and zone change (GPZ2023-0001) to amend the General Plan Land Use Policy Map and Zoning Map on a

6.95-acre property at 1494 Fairway Drive, herein referred to as the Project; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2024, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council authorize the filing of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project , in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq., as amended; and
WHEREAS, on November 6 , 202 4, the Planning Commission made its recommendation in writing that the City Council amend the General Plan Land Use Policy Map of the City of Santa Maria for the Project site; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held on this amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map by the City Council on November 19, 2024; and WHEREAS, the City Council made no substantial modification of the proposed amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map which had not been previously considered by the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered all written and oral testimony; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered and relied on the Planning Commission’s recommendations to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project, in making its decision on the amendment to the Land Use Policy Map of the City’s General Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council finds that:
a) The proposed project is consistent with applicable goals and policies of the General Plan. The purpose of the Light Industrial General Plan Land Use design ation as
described on page LU-19 of the City’s General Plan Land Use section is, “To accommodate industrial uses which
contain the process primarily within the building, do not generate negative environmental impacts, and which are
most compatible with adj acent nonindustrial uses.” The site location and the proposed conceptual industrial or manufacturing development would be consistent with the
Light Industrial Land Use description. The designation is meant to provide for the future development of permitted and/or conditionally permitted industrial or manufacturing uses at the site under the M-1 zone, Chapter 12-15 of the City of Santa Maria Municipal Code.
b) The proposed project would not significantly disrupt any of the various land uses in the vicinity because the Project would extend the industrial land use pattern in the area and facilitate future industrial or manufacturing uses of similar intensity to, and therefore compatible with, the existing adjacent industrial uses. No land use conflicts would be es tablished as identified in the City’s General Plan Land Use Element (Goal L.U.7) because the project
site is adjacent to development and zoning that is either the same Land Use designation as proposed by the
project or is designated for other compatible designations.

The project site is not adjacent to sensitive land uses, and does not have the potential to create conflicts with
sensitive uses; therefore, the project site is an acceptable location for future industrial or manufacturing proposals. c) The proposed PD/M-1 zoning, and LI land use designation would align the property with the existing properties zoned PD/M-1 adjacent to the site that are across A Street to the east of the project site. The project is consistent with the safety and noise po licies in the Airport Land Use
Compatibility Plan. Therefore, the proposed modifications are required for public necessity, convenience , and
general welfare.
d) The proposed project is afforded the appropriate services and facilities in that all infrastructur e is currently available to serve the project site because the project vicinity has been previously developed with infrastructure to
accommodate commercial and industrial projects of a
similar size including hotels in the project vicinity.

Section 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Maria approves an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map for

6.95-acres from A-AS (A irport-Airport Service ) to LI (L ight Industrial) as shown on Attachment B of the Council Agenda Report dated November 19, 202 4, incorporated herein by reference.

Section 4. The Director of Community Development , or designee, is hereby authorized and directed to make corresponding
changes on the Land Use Policy Map of the General Plan in conformity with this resolution.

Section 5. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the C ity Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 19th day of November, 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
City Manager

ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA

MARIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE SANTA MARIA PUBLIC AIRPORT DISTRICT (GPZ2023-0001) ON

6.95 ACRES LOCATED AT 1494 FAIRWAY DRIVE FROM OS (OPEN
SPACE) TO PD/M-1 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT/LIGHT

MANUFACTURING)

6.95-acre property at 1494 Fairway Drive, herein referred to as the Project; and

WHEREAS, on November 6, 2024, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council authorize the filing of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq., as amended; and

WHEREAS, on November 6, 20 24, the Planning Commission made its recommendation in writing that the City Council amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Santa Maria for the Project site from OS (Open Space ) to PD/ M-1 (Planned Development/Light Manufacturing); and

WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held on this amendment to the Official Zoning Map by the City Council on November 19, 2024; and WHEREAS, the City Council made no substantial modification of the proposed amendment to the Official Zoning Map which had not been previously considered by the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered all written and oral testimony; and

WHEREAS, the City Council considered and relied on the Planning Commission’s recommendations to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project in making its decision on the amendment to the Official Zoning Map.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, State of California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. An amendment to the Official Zoning Map of the City of Santa Maria is hereby approved for 6.95-acres from the OS (Open Space) zone district to the PD/M-1 (Planned Development/ Light Manufacturing) zone district for the project as shown on 2 Attachment B of the Council Agenda Report dated November 19, 2024, incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 3. The Director of Community Development, or designee, is hereby authorized and directed to make corresponding
changes on the Official Zoning Map with this Ordinance.

SECTION 4. The City Council finds that the proposal is in accordance with the provisions of the General Plan of the City, that the proposed modifications are required for the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare, and that in the case of the zone change, the area is afforded the services and facilities appropriate for the zone proposed.

SECTION 5. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage. Within 15 days following its passage, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published in a
newspaper of general circulation in accordance with State Law; or when deemed necessary due to the length or
complexity of the Ordinance, cause a summary of the
Ordinance to be prepared and published at least five days prior to the City Council meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted. If a summary is published at least five days prior to the City Council meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted, then within 15 days after adoption of the Ordinance the City Clerk shall publish a summary of the Ordinance with the names of those City
Council Members voting for and against the Ordinance and shall post a certified copy of the full text of such adopted Ordinance along with the names of those City Council
Members voting for and against the Ordinance.

3 INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on this 19th day of November, 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
City Manager

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Acting City Manager Chuen Wu

BY: Interim Community Development Director Dana Eady

SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolutions and Introduction of an Ordinance for Richards Ranch Annexation, Pre -Zoning, and General Plan Amendment

Description:

The City Council will consider the Richards Ranch Annexation, Pre-Zoning, and General Plan Amendment project. The project site is 4 3.75 acres located at the southeast and northeast corners of the intersection of Highway 135 and Union Valley Parkway in the unincorporated Orcutt area of Santa Barbara County.

Environmental Notice: Environmental review for this project was completed through the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2022020194) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) State Guidelines.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. Adopt a Resolution to certify an Environmental Impact Report making California Environmental Quality Act Findings, adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Richards Ranch Annexation, Pre -Zoning, and General Plan Land Use Map Amendment located at the northeast and southeast intersections of Union Valley Parkway and Highway 135; and

2. Adopt a Resolution approving an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map for approximately 43.75 acres located at the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of Highway 135 and Union Valley Parkway; and

3. Introduce an Ordinance pre -zoning approximately 43.75 acres located in the unincorporated area of Santa Barbara County from Retail Commercial (C -2) to Planned Development/ General Commercial (PD/C-2) on 16. 35 acres, and Planned Development/High Density Residential (PD/R-3) on 27.4 acres; and

4. Adopt a Resolution approving an application initiating proceedings for the Richards Ranch Reorganization (AN2021-0001).

2 BACKGROUND:

The project site consists of four parcels totaling 43.75 acres located at the southeast and northeast corners of the intersection of Highway 135 and Union Valley Parkway (Attachment A, Vicinity Map). The property is within the unincorporated area of Santa Barbara County in the Orcutt Community Plan area and is east of the City of Santa Maria’s southeastern city limits and within the City’s Sphere of Influence (SOI). The property is identified in Santa Barbara County’s Orcutt Community Plan as “Key Site 26 (Richards)”.

The Orcutt Community Plan includes policies and development standards for developing the site in the County for future residential, open space, and retail commercial uses.

Surrounding land uses include single-family residential development to the north and south, high-density residential (apartments) to the east, and Highway 135 and residential development to the west.

The property is currently vacant and was most recently developed with a single -family dwelling located in the southwestern corner of the site and accessory structures. These structures were demolished in approximately 2010. Prior to the current property owner, the site was owned by Wal -Mart who had intended to develop the property with a n ew retail store. This development did not move forward as the property owner was not able to secure a source of supplemental water for the project as required by Golden State Water Company under the Santa Maria River Valley Groundwater Basin Stipulation.

Planning Commission Review
The project was presented to the City of Santa Maria Planning Commission at the July 18, 2024, study session. Commissioners discussed the proposed annexation request and directed questions to staff and the applicant regarding how services would be provided should the site be annexed. The public in attendance were provided time to share their comments and have their questions addressed regarding the project.

The Planning Commission then reviewed the project at the October 2, 2024 , public hearing. The public in attendance raised concerns regarding the proposed annexation request, specifically that any future development on the property would be under the City’s jurisdiction and not the County of Santa Barbara. Most commented that t hey did not oppose the future development of the site but some were concerned that future retail and residential development on the site would cause traffic impacts to Highway 135 and Union Valley Parkway, and overcrowding at area schools. After deliberati ons, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve the recommended actions to amend the land use designation and pre-zoning of the property and authorize the submittal of an application for annexation of the property to the Santa Barbara County Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO).

DISCUSSION:

The project applicant, MD3 Investments, is requesting annexation of the 43.75 -acre property from the unincorporated area of Santa Barbara County into the City of Santa Maria city limits. The request also includes an application for a General Plan Amendment

3 and Pre-Zoning of the four parcels to allow for the future development of the southern portion of the property with residential uses (apartments and condos), and the northern portion with a retail commercial shopping center.

Annexation Request
The project site is currently located outside of the Santa Maria city limits but is within the existing SOI, as defined in the City’s General Plan Land Use Element. An SOI is a planning boundary that is outside of an agency’s legal boundary (i.e., the city limit line) and defines the agency’s probable future boundary and service area. For lands to be considered for annexation into a city, the land must be within the City’s designated SOI.

Annexation of the project site into the City is a formal municipal reorganization action that requires approval by LAFCO.

If the City Council certifies the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project and initiates filing an application for annexation to LAFCO, the City as the lead agency would prepare the application. The application to LAFCO would include the purpose of the proposal, land use , and zoning information (existing and proposed), conformity with County and Cit y General Plans and SOI, a plan for providing services including water supply, and any impacts to open space and agriculture that could occur from the proposal.

Before the LAFCO executive officer can issue a certificate of filing and schedule the proposal for LAFCO consideration, the City of Santa Maria, Santa Barbara County, and any affected special districts are required to negotiate the allocation of property tax revenues during a mandatory negotiation period . If an agreement i s not reached, an alternate negotiation, mediation, and arbitration process is required. Once an agreement is reached, the executive officer may issue a certificate of filing which is a pre -condition to LAFCO’s consideration of the application for annexation.

In their review of the application, LAFCO may approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed annexation. The factors that LAFCO must consider in reviewing annexation proposals include, but are not limited to, population density, the need for or ganized community services, the effect of the proposed action on adjacent areas, conformity with LAFCO policies on providing planned, orderly, efficient patterns of urban development, consistency with the General Plan, and the ability to provide services, including water supply.

Proposed Services
The project site is located within the service area of Golden State Water Company (GSWC) and the Laguna County Sanitation District (LSCD). Water and Wastewater services to the site would therefore continue to be provided by GSWC and LCSD, respectively. GSWC and LCSD have provided letters stating that they can and will be able to provide services to the future development of the property, subject to compliance with specified conditions.

4 In order to obtain water from GSWC, the applicant is required to provide a source of supplemental water to offset the increased water demand, pursuant to the Court adopted Stipulation in Santa Maria Valley Water Conservation District v City of Santa Maria, et al. (and related actions)1. The City of Santa Maria is a provider of supplemental water, and applicants may apply to the City to purchase supplemental water through a Supplemental Water Agreement.

The decision to sell supplemental water is at the discretion of the City . In the past, the City has elected to not provide supplemental water to the subject property, most recently in 2006 when Wal-Mart owned the property. While annexation of the project site is not a prerequisite to or a requirement for the applicant’s ability to purchase supplemental water from the City, the City typically would provide supplemental water to the property if it were located within city limits . GSWC, which has existing water lines adjacent to the project site underneath Orcutt Road, would then deliver water to the site. Any improvements to the existing water or sewer lines or construction of new water or sewer lines would be the responsibility of the developer of the property.

Fire protection services would be provided by the City of Santa Mari a from Fire Station No. 6 located at 3339 Terminal Drive (Santa Maria Airport). This station is planned to be equipped with a fire engine and additional staffing to be fully operational to serve areas of the City and county beyond the airport property. The Santa Barbara County Fire Department would remain available to provide fire services to the property under the mutual aid agreement with the City of Santa Maria. Police services would be provided by the City of Santa Maria. Any future students would atten d schools within the local area, including the Orcutt School District or private schools. The developer would be required to pay fees to the public school district to offset the impacts associated with increased students generated by the project.

Pre-Zoning and General Plan Amendment Request
Pre-zoning is a required component of the annexation process. California Government Code Section 65859 allows the City to adopt (i.e., pre-zone) a zoning designation for land outside its city limits in anticipation of annexation and development. Under the code provisions, the zoning designation adopted by the City would not become effective unless the property were to be annexed to the City.

The County currently has the entire 43.75-acre site zoned as C-2 (retail commercial). The request by the applicant includes the pre-zoning designations of General Commercial (C- 2) on 16.35 acres of the site and High Density Residential (R -3) on the remaining 27.4 acres. The sites would also be located within the Planned Development (PD) Overlay District, which is designed and intended to provide for the orderly development of land in conformance with the City’s General Plan.

The proposed pre -zoning designations would accommodate a range of potential land uses, as listed below.

1 Lead Case No. CV 770214, Superior Court of the State California, County of Santa Clara, in January 2008, and Commission Decision No. 13-05-011.
5  General Commercial (C-2): This designation is intended to provide for general commercial and retail outside the central core, particularly along lineal development corridors. Permitted uses include retail uses and service establishments, such as clothing stores, department stores, home improvement centers, furniture sales, secondhand sales, banks and financial institutions, commercial and professional offices, restaurants, physical fitness centers/health clubs, auto repair shops, blueprint shops, dental laboratories, medical clinic s, hotels and motels, light equipment rentals, and beauty shops.  High Density Residential (R-3): This designation is intended to provide for an urban residential environment, preferably close to shopping facilities and existing activity centers, as well as provide an incentive for reinvestment in older established areas.

Permitted uses include single -family dwellings, duplexes, tri plexes, and larger multi-family complexes, small family day care homes, with an overall density not to exceed 22 dwelling units per acre. Senior citizen housing may also be permitted to a maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre.
 Planned Development (PD) Overlay District: This overlay district designation is intended to accommodate various types of development such as neighborhood and district shopping centers, professional and administrative office complexes, multiple housing developments, single -family residential developments, commercial service centers, and light industrial parks or any other use or combination of uses which can be made appropriately a part of a total planned development, in accordance with the City General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

The current County General Plan land use designations for the project site is General Commercial/Office and Professional/Planned Development -3.3, which is intended for mixed-use development with a maximum of 3.3 dwelling units per acre. Since the project site is located within the City’s planning area and SOI, it is also identified for planned development by the City. The City currently provides a land use designation of Commercial/Professional Office for the site, which allows for office de velopment for medical, legal, travel agencies, insurance, and real estate services, as well as a complementary mixed-use including residential and commercial uses.

With the proposed development scenario and proposed pre-zoning, the City would need to also amend the General Plan land use designation for the site. For this reason, the project also includes a General Plan amendment to apply a Community Commercial (CC) land use designation on 16.35 acres of the site and High Density Residential (HDR -22) for the remaining 27.4 acres.

Conceptual Development Plan
A conceptual plan for future development of the project site has been prepared to evaluate potential environmental impacts of the eventual development of the site if the proposed annexation and pre-zoning were to be approved. The plan, included as Attachment B to this report, shows the potential future development that could occur consistent with the project’s proposed pre-zoning designations. This includes a buildout of 106,800 square- 6 feet of commercial uses and a 39,500 -square-foot mini-storage complex on 16.35 acres of the project site and 400 apartments and 95 townhomes on the remaining 27.40 acres.

The commercial uses would be concentrated on the frontages of U nion Valley Parkway (UVP) and SR 135, with site access available via Orcutt Road and U VP. The northern portion of the project site (north of UVP) would support most of the proposed commercial uses, allowing for up to 96,800 square feet of commercial development. This development scenario assumes a drive-through commercial space northeast of the intersection at SR 135 and UVP, as well as a retail center, corner gas station, and mini-storage facility east of Orcutt Road on the northeastern portion of the project site. Additional commercial uses at the southwestern portion of the site are anticipated t o accommodate up to two drive - through commercial sites, totaling a maximum of 10,000 square feet. High -density residential uses would be located in the southeastern portion of the project site (south of UVP and east of Orcutt Road) and would include up to 400 apartments with common park space, and 95 townhomes.

Future project buildout of any of these uses within the project site would require individual Planned Development Permit applications for the development of each of the proposed residential and commercial projects. These applications would be reviewed by the City at the time they are received to ensure they are consistent with the zoning and have been adequately evaluated under CEQA. The applications would be under the discretion of the City of Santa Maria Planning Commission.

Alternative(s)
The City Council may summarily deny the project. This action would cause the subject property to remain as is, located within the City’s SOI boundary, under Santa Barbara County jurisdiction.

Environmental Review
An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the proposed project (State Clearinghouse No. 2022020194). The Draft EIR was circulated for public review from December 22, 2022, to March 7, 2023. The City received over 100 public comments on the Draft EIR including, but not limited to, letters from Santa Barbara County (Planning and Development, Fire Department, Public Works Transportation Division, Air Pollution Control District), LAFCO, CA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, and CalGEM. The EIR is included in this report as Attachment C.

Following the release of the Draft EIR, new information was obtained regarding the monarch butterfly and overwintering habitat for the species. For these reasons, the City determined that the portions of the Draft EIR related to Biological Resources and Project Alternatives should be revised and recirculated for public comment. The partially recirculated EIR was released for a 45 -day public comment period from January 31 to March 15, 2024. At the completion of t he public review period, the City received six additional comment letters. All of the comments received on the Draft and partially recirculated EIR have been reviewed and addressed in the Response to Comments section of the EIR.

7 Mitigation Measures were developed to address potential project impacts in the topic areas of Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Wate r Quality, and Noise. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is provided as Attachment F to this staff report.

The EIR identifies significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts to Biological Resources resulting from the future buildout of the property. This is due to its potential to impact the monarch butterfly through the removal of a stand of eucalyptus trees on the property that is identified by the Xerces Society as an overwintering site for the monarch butterfly. The Statement of Overriding Considerations addressing this impact is provided as Attachment E.

Fiscal Considerations
If the City Council initiates proceedings to file an annexation application to LAFCO, a comprehensive fiscal analysis would be prepared as a part of the application. Additionally, the City of Santa Maria, Santa Barbara County, and any affected special districts are required to negotiate the allocation of property tax revenues , and any other items identified, during a mandatory negotiation period . The full costs of developing the property, including roadway and frontage improvements, and installation of utilities would be the responsibility of the developer.

Impact to the Community
The annexation of the property into the City of Santa Maria would allow the vacant property to be provided with the services needed to develop the site with new retail and residential uses that would serve the region. Future development of the site will be subject to the mitigation measures in the Environmental Impact Report to reduce potential noise, traffic, lighting, and associated impacts to adjacent residential neighborhoods .

Discretionary permits (ex. Planned Development Permits) for future development would be reviewed in public hearings by the City’s Planning Commission.

ATTACHMENTS

A. Vicinity Map
B. Conceptual Development Plan
C. Environmental Impact Report
D. CEQA Findings
E. Statement of Overriding Considerations
F. Mitigation Monitoring Program
G. Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations H. Pre-zoning Designations
I. Legal Descriptions

VICINITY MAP
ATTACHMENT A¯
ANGE
LE
S
HOBBS

TALLYHO

UNION VALLEY
BENJI
FOSTER

PATTERSON

BROOKSIDE
D A
NCER

WELLINGTON

DOVERLEE

AMETHYST

BRADLEY

MEADOWBROOK

HILLVIEW

OLD MILL

HARTNELL
CHE
RRY
EILEEN

UNNAMED
ALLEY

LOS PADRES
LYDIA

WOODMERE
M
ARTIN
DAVID
HUMME
L

MILLSTONE

MOONCREST
LUPIN
COA
CHM
AN
O
RCU
TT
LARCH
PARK
NORTH
WILSON
RITA
POPPY
ODIE
DAHLIA

CLUBHOUSE
BERRY
W
OO
D
CAIN
LOMA

STANSBURY

POPPINGA

FAIRMONT
ROSS

SHIRLEY
HWY 135
SILER

TOWNSEND
PABST
FOXENW
OOD

CALIFORNIA
HARSIN
BLAKE
HWY 135
Esri Community Maps Contributors, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS, Sources:

Esri, Airbus DS, USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS, NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FEMA, Intermap and the GIS user community
0 0.2 0.4 0.60.1
Miles
City Boundary Line
Project Site

ATTACHMENT B - CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

ATTACHMENT C

Environmental Impact Report

The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and accompanying documents are available on the City’s website at the following link:

https://www.cityofsantamaria.org/services/departments/community- development/planning-division/planning-policies-and-
regulations/environmental-impact-reports

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 1 OF 16

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS

RICHARDS RANCH ANNEXATION, GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT,

AND PRE-ZONING

A. Findings that with regard to certain project and cumulative effects, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment.

The following topics were discussed in detail within the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Richards Ranch Annexation (July 2024) and were determined to result in less than significant impacts after implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the EIR.

1. AIR QUALITY (AQ) AND GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) EMISSIONS
a. AQ Impact 2. The project could result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants . These potential impacts will be reduced through Mitigation Measures AQ/mm-2.1 and AQ/mm-2.2. These measures will require construction measures to minimize short -term construction emissions. These include us ing water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site, minimizing the amount of disturbed area and reduc ing onsite veh icle speeds to 15 mph or less, covering soil stockpiles if they are present for more than two days, installing gravel pads at all access points to prevent tracking of mud onto public roads, and several other construction-period control measures. In additio n, to reduce mobile -source emissions, all portable diesel-powered construction equipment shall be registered with the state's portable equipment registration program or shall obtain a Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD) permit.Current regulations for off -road diesel vehicles shall be followed, equipment shall be subject to existing regulations for heavy -duty diesel -fueled vehicle s, diesel equipment meeting CARB Tier 3 or higher emission standards for off-road heavy- duty diesel engines shall be used for construction activities, on -road heavy-duty equipment with model year 2010 engines or newer shall be used, diesel-powered equipment shall be replaced by electric equipment whenever available, and several other measure s to reduce vehic le exhaust. The measures identified in Mitigation Measures AQ/mm-2.1 and AQ/mm-2.2 will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

b. AQ Impact 3. The project could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. These potential impacts will also be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measure s AQ/mm-2.1 and AQ/mm-2.2, described under AQ Impact 2. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

c. AQ Impact 5. The project’s air pollutant emissions could result in a cumulative contribution to air pollution in the region. These potential impacts will also be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measure s

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 2 OF 16
AQ/mm-2.1 and AQ/mm-2.2, described under AQ Impact 2. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

d. GHG Impact 2. The project could conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. These potential impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures EN/mm-1.1, GHG/mm-2.1, and GHG/mm-

2.2. Mitigation Measure EN/mm-1-1 requires meeting or exceeding CalGreen Tier 2 standards at the time of development for building energy efficiency, meeting or exceeding CalGreen building standards at the time of develop ment for water conservation, built -in appliances to be Energy Star certified or equivalent, maximizing natural lighting buildings to minimize daytime lighting demand, and outdoor lighting that minimizes electrical demand. Mitigation Measure GHG/mm -

2.1 requ ires design features to encourage the use of alternate transportation modes and reduce mobile -source emissions. Mitigation Measure GHG/mm -2.2 prohibits the servicing of residential development by natural gas. In addition, natural gas service for commercial development shall only be allowed with significant restrictions, including the preparation and implementation of a GHG- reduction plan to fully offset GHG emissions associated with natural gas service to commercial land uses. Off -site mitigation measures m ay include “Direct Reduction Activities” or the purchase of “Carbon Offset Credits .” The measures identified in Mitigation Measures EN/mm-1.1, GHG/mm-2.1, and GHG/mm-2.2 will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

e. GHG Impact 3 . The project could result in a cumulative contribution to GHG emissions in the region. The measures identified in Mitigation Measures EN/mm-

1.1, GHG/mm-2.1, and GHG/mm-2.2, described under GHG Impact 2, will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

2. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (BIO)
a. BIO Impact 1. The project could directly or indirectly impact special-status wildlife species during project construction. Mitigation Measures BIO/mm -1.1, BIO/mm-

1.2, BIO/mm-1.3, BIO/mm-1.4, and BIO/mm-1.5, provide for several measures to address construction-period impacts including the prohibition of invasive plants, a biological monitor to provide oversight to implementation of all the identified mitigation measures, implementation of a Worker Environmental Training Program, and ensure erosion control is biodegradabl e. As well, additional measures will be required under Mitigation Measures BIO/mm -2.1, BIO/mm-3.1, BIO/mm-4.1, BIO/mm 5.1, and BIO/mm -11.1. The measures identified in Mitigation Measures BIO/mm -1.1 through BIO/mm -1.5 and Mitigation Measures BIO/mm-2.1, BIO /mm-3.1, BIO/mm -4.1, BIO/mm 5.1, and BIO/mm -11.1 will reduce construction-period impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

b. BIO Impact 3. The project could directly and indirectly impact northern California legless lizards during project construction. These potential impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO/mm -

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 3 OF 16

1.1 through BIO/mm-1.5 and Mitigation Measure BIO/mm-3.1, which provides for specific measures to address northern California legless lizards , including pre - construction surveys for northern California legless lizards within suitable habitat areas within the development area. These measures will reduce potential impacts to the California legless lizards during project construction to less than significant.

Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

c. BIO Impact 4. The project could directly and indirectly impact nesting birds during project construction. These potential impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO/mm -1.1 through BIO/mm-1.5 and Mitigation Measure BIO/mm -4.1, which provides for specific measures to address nesting birds, including timing vegetation removal and initial site disturbance between September 1 and January 31 outside of the nesting season for birds and, if vegetation removal and site disturbance must be conducted during this tim e period , to require nesting bird surveys before construction and protect any identified nests. These measures will reduce potential impacts to the nesting birds during project construction to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

d. BIO Impact 5. The project could directly and indirectly impact roosting western red bats during project construction. These potential impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implem entation of Mitigation Measure BIO/mm -5.1, which provides for specific measures to address potential roosting western red bats, including pre-construction surveys and implementing protection measures if roosting western red bats are identified. These measu res will reduce potential impacts during project construction to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

e. BIO Impact 7. The development of the infrastructure improvements beyon d the

43.75-acre project site boundary could directly or indirectly impact special -status wildlife species. These potential impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO/mm-1.2 through BIO/mm-1.5, BIO/mm-3.1, BIO/mm -4.1, and BIO/mm -5.1. These measures will reduce potential impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

f. BIO Impact 11. The project could result in conflicts with City policies and ordinances protecting biological resources, specifically considerations under the City’s Resource Management Element (RME) of the General Plan and the Municipal Code. These potential impacts will be reduced with the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO/mm-1.1 through BIO/mm-1.5, BIO/mm-2.1, BIO/mm-

3.1, BIO/mm-4.1, and BIO/mm-5.1. In addition, Mitigation Measure BIO/mm-11.1 will require specific measures to address the City’s R ME and Municipal Code related to tree protection and replacement and R ME Goal 3 and Policy 3. In combination, these measures will address potential conflicts with City policies and ordinances protecting biological resources. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 4 OF 16

3. CULTURAL (CR) AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES (TCR)
a. CR Impact 2 . The project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an unknown archaeological resource. Mitigation Measure CR/mm-

2.1 provides for measures to address the unlikely discovery of archaeological resources during project implementation , including retaining a qualified archeologist to evaluate the find and recommend protection measures. In addition, if human remains are discovered, State of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 is required to be followed . Mitigation Measure CR/mm-2.1 will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

b. CR Impact 3. The project could disturb previously unidentified human remains if present within the project site. Mitigation Measure CR/mm-2.1, described under CR Impact 2, will reduce impacts to less than significant. The refore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

c. CR Impact 4 . The project will have the potential to result in cumulatively considerable impacts associated with cultural resources. Mitigation Measure CR/mm-2.1, described under CR Impact 2, will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

d. TCR Impact 1. While there are no resources listed in or eligible for listing in th e California Register of Historical Resources ( CRHR) or local register of historic resources, the project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an unknown tribal cultural resource determined by the City to be a significant resourc e to a California Native American Tribe. Mitigation Measure CR/mm-2.1, described under CR Impact 2, will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

4. ENERGY (EN)
a. EN Impact 1. The project could result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction and operation.

These potential impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures EN/mm-1.1, GHG/mm-2.1, and GHG/mm-

2.2. Mitigation Measure EN/mm-1.1 requires meeting or exceeding CalGreen Tier 2 standards at the time of development for building energy efficiency, meeting or exceeding CalGreen building standards at the t ime of development for water conservation, built -in appliances shall be Energy Star certified or equivalent, maximizing natural lighting buildings to minimize daytime lighting demand, and outdoor lighting that minimizes electrical demand. Mitigation Measur e GHG/mm-

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 5 OF 16
to commercial land uses. Off -site miti gation measures may include “Direct Reduction Activities” or the purchase of “Carbon Offset Credits.” The measures identified in Mitigation Measures EN/mm-1.1, GHG/mm-2.1, and GHG/mm-2.2 will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

b. EN Impact 2. The project could conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. The measures identified in Mitigation Measures EN/mm-1.1, GHG/mm-2.1, and GHG/mm-2.2, as described under EN Impact 1, will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

5. GEOLOGY AND SOILS (GEO)
a. GEO Impact 2. The project could cause substantial adverse effects associated with strong seismic ground shaking. These potential impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO/mm-

2.1, GEO/mm-2.2, and GEO /mm-2.3. Thes e measures require a variety of engineering and design measures to be incorporated into the construction plans, to be incorporated prior to the issuance of building permits and verified by the City Building Division. The measures identified in Mitigation M easures GEO/mm-2.1 through GEO/mm-2.3 will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

b. GEO Impact 3. Future development on -site could result in substantial adverse effects associated with liquefaction and seismically induced settlement. These potential impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO/mm-2.1 through GEO /mm-2.3 and GEO/mm -3.1 through GEO/mm-3.3. These measures require a variety of design measures to be incorporated into the construction plans and implemented, to be incorporated prior to the issuance of building permits and verified by the City Building Division.

The measures identified in Mitigation Measures GEO/mm-2.1 through GEO/mm-

2.3 and GEO/mm -3.1 through GEO/mm -3.3 will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

c. GEO Impact 5. The project could result in substantial soil erosion and the loss of topsoil. These potential impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO/mm-5.1. These measures req uire a variety of design measures to be incorporated into the construction plans and implemented to address drainage and potential erosion. The measures identified in Mitigation Measure GEO/mm-5.1 will reduce impacts to less than significant.

Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 6 OF 16
d. GEO Impact 6. The project could result in substantial adverse effects associated with liquefaction, settlement, hydroconsolidation, and seismically induced settlement. These potential impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO/mm -2.1 through GEO/mm -2.3, GEO/mm-3.1 through GEO/mm-3.3, and GEO/mm-6.1. These measures require a variety of design measures to be incorporate d into the construction plans and implemented, to be incorporated prior to the issuance of building permits and verified by the City Building Division. The measures identified in Mitigation Measures GEO/mm-2.1 through GEO/mm -2.3, GEO/mm-3.1 through GEO/mm -

3.3, and GEO/mm-6.1 will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

e. GEO Impact 9. Ground-disturbing activities could damage paleontological resources that may be present below the surface. This potential impact will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO/mm-9.1, which provides for the implementation of a Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) to train the grading personnel/crew and address potential paleontological resource discoveries. In addition, an inadvertent discovery clause will be included in every construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement. Mitigation Measure GEO/mm -9.1 will reduce potential paleontological impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

f. GEO Impact 10. The project will have the potential to result in cumulatively considerable impacts associated with geology and soils. These potential impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO/mm-2.1 through GEO/mm -2.3, GEO/mm-3.1 through GEO/mm -

3.3, GEO/mm-5.1, GEO/mm-6.1, and GEO/mm-9.1. The measures identified will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

6. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (HAZ)
a. HAZ Impact 2. Construction of infrastructure associated with the project could result in the release of aerially deposited lead , a hazardous material, into the environment. No other potentially significant impacts related to ups et or accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials will occur. These potential impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ/mm -2.1 and HAZ/mm -2.2, which will require soil sampling f or the presence of hazardous materials, including aerially deposited lead and hydrocarbons in areas where excavation is required within 30 feet of State Route 135 and appropriate abatement measures, if necessary. As well, a Soil Management Plan and Health and Safety Plan will be required and implemented for the infrastructure improvements that are located beyond the

43.75-acre site . The measures identified will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than signi ficant with incorporation of mitigation.

b. HAZ Impact 5. Future development may have the potential to be inconsistent with safety and/or compatibility policies of the Santa Maria Public Airport land use plan

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 7 OF 16
in effect at the time of building permit applications. This impact will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ/mm -5.1, which will require the demonstration of full compliance with the applicable safety standards and compatibility policies of the airp ort land use plan prior to the issuance of any building permits. This measure will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

c. HAZ Impact 7. While there is some potential for the project to result in cumulative considerable impacts related to safety and/or compatibility policies of the Santa Maria Public Airport land use plan, implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ/mm-5.1, which will require the demonstration of full compliance with the applicable safety standards and compatibility policies of the airport land use plan prior to the issuance of any building permits, will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than si gnificant with incorporation of mitigation.

7. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY (HYD)
a. HYD Impact 1. Construction of the project could violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. This impact will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO/mm -5.1, described under GEO Impact 5, and the implementation of Mitigation Measures HYD/mm -1.1 and HYD/mm-1.2, which require the development of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and implementation of these plans during construction. Specif ic erosion control and grading requirements are provided in Mitigation Measures HYD/mm -

1.2 and will be installed prior to beginning of any construction or grading activities and are subject to review and approval by the City. The measures identified in Mitigation Measures GEO/mm -5.1, HYD/mm -1.1, and HYD/mm -1.2 will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

b. HYD Impact 2. Operation of the project could violate wat er quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. This impact will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures HYD/mm-2.1, HYD/mm-2.2 and HYD/mm-

2.3. These measures provide for the incorporation of low impact development best management practices (BMPs) and maintenance of post-construction stormwater controls. As required by HYD/mm -2.3, these measures will be incorporated into the stormwater quality system depicted in the erosion and sediment control plan.

The measures identified in Mitigation Measures HYD/mm -2.1, HYD/mm-2.2 and HYD/mm-2.3 will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

c. HYD Impact 5. If the proper design measures and BMPs were not implemented, the project could alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or increase surface water runoff in a manner that could result in substantial erosio n, siltation, and/or loss of topsoil. These impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of previously identified and described Mitigation Measures

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 8 OF 16
GEO/mm-5.1, HYD/mm-1.1, HYD/mm-1.2, and HYD/mm -2.1 through HYD/mm -

2.3. The measu res will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

d. HYD Impact 7. Implementation of the project will not conflict with or obstruct implantation of a water quali ty control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. These impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of previously identified and described Mitigation Measures HYD/mm-1.1, HYD/mm -1.2, and HYD/mm -2.1 through HYD/mm -2.3. The measures will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

e. HYD Impact 8. The project could result in cumulatively considerable impacts to hydrology and water quality. These impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of previously identified and described Mitigation Measures GEO/mm-5.1, HYD/mm-1.1, HYD/mm-1.2, and HYD/mm -2.1 through HYD/mm-2.3. The measures will reduce impacts to l ess than significant.

Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

8. NOISE (NOI)
a. NOI Impact 1. The project could generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. This impact will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI/mm-1.1 and NOI/mm -1.2, which provide for the incorporation of control measures during construction, including compliance with the noise ordinance and limit ation on the timing of construction activity, and additional measures to limit long-term exposure to transportation and non-transportation noise. The measures identified in Mitigation Measures NOI/mm-1.1 and NOI/mm -1.2 will reduce impacts to less than sign ificant.

Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

b. NOI Impact 4 . The project will have the potential to result in cumulatively considerable impacts associated with noise. The measures identified in Mitigation Measures NOI/mm-1.1 and NOI/mm-1.2, as described under NOI Impact 1, will reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

9. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS (USS)
a. USS Impact 1. The project will require the construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, and telecommunications facilities. These impacts will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of previously identified and described Mitigation Measures AQ/mm-1.1 and AQ/mm-1.2; BIO/mm-1.1 through BIO/mm-

1.5, BIO/mm -2.1, BIO/mm -3.1, BIO/mm -4.1, BIO/mm -5.1, and BIO/mm -11.1; CR/mm-2.1; GEO/mm -5.1 and GEO/mm -9.1; HAZ/mm -2.1 and HAZ/mm -2.2; HYD/mm-1.1 and HYD/mm -1.2; and NOI/mm -1.1. These measures will reduce

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 9 OF 16
impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact will be Class II, less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

B. Findings that with regard to certain project and cumulative effects, those changes or alterations which mitigate those effects, are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency.

No impacts were identified in the EIR for which mitigation measures were the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency.

C. Findings that with regard to certain project and cumulative effects, specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other consid erations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.

The EIR identified two (2) significant, una voidable a dverse project-specific or cumulative related environmental impacts associated with the proposed project that cannot be mitigated to less than significant levels by the adoption of mitigation measures.

The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find that these impacts will be mitigated to the maximum extent feasible, but will still remain significant and unavoidable, consistent with the following findings.

1. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

a. BIO Impact 2. The future development of the property could directly impact monarch butterflies. This impact would be Class I, significant and unavoidable.

Required mitigation measures will help reduce this impact, but not to a less than significant level. The measures identified in Mitigation Measur es BIO/mm -1.1 through BIO/mm-1.5 will be implemented , as previously described . In addition, Mitigation Measure BIO/mm -2.1 will be required, which provides for a series of measures to reduce direct impacts to the monarch butterfly and compensate for the loss of monarch butterfly habitat. In summary, the measures incorporated into Mitigation Measure BIO/mm-2.1 include:
 If possible, avoiding site disturbance and construction activity that would impact eucalyptus trees onsite during the monarch butterflies' fall and winter migration period (October 15 through February 29).  If tree or vegetation removal or site disturbance is required during th e monarch butterflies’ fall and winter migration period (October 15 through February 29), a City -approved biologist familiar with monarchs and monarch overwintering habitat shall conduct focused surveys for monarch colonies within the identified overwinter ing site and will identify any colonies found within 7 days of proposed vegetation removal or site disturbance or when known monarch overwintering is occurring at other locations within the region. If monarch butterflies are detected,

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 10 OF 16
development shall be postponed until after the overwintering period or until the City-approved biologist determines monarch butterflies are no longer using the trees for overwintering.
 To provide further protection to non -overwintering populations and/or adjacent over -wintering populations, no Asclepias curassavica (tropical milkweed) will be allowed in any planting palettes for the project. To contribute to local monarch butterfly conservation efforts, native nectar - providing plant species will be incorporated into landscaping following construction activities, such as those recommended in the Monarch Butterfly Nectar Plant List for Conservation Plantings, to enhance local nectar sources.
 As a condition of approval for the Planned Development permit(s), the use of neonicotinoids and synthetic pesticides shall be prohibited in the initial project plantings and throughout the life of the project in open space, pocket parks, and other common landscaped areas. This condition shall apply to the common open spaces for the life of the project and shall be included in the CC&Rs which will be recorded against the property prior to the issuance of a first certificate of occupancy. In addition, future residents and occupants shall be encouraged to not used neonicotinoids, synthetic pesticides, and/or plants treated with these materials; residents and occupants will be provided educational materials describing 1) viable alternatives to these products, and 2) the detrimental effects of these products on butterflies and other pollinators.
 Prior to the approval of a Planned Development permit and prior to the removal of any trees within the overwintering site, the developer shall hire a City -approved biologist familiar with monarchs and monarch overwintering habitat to prepare and implement a monarch butterfly habitat enhancement plan. At a minimum, the plan shall identify area(s) on the property appropriate for onsite habitat enhancement to partially address the direct impacts of tree removal. The recommendations in this plan shall be included within the project's future project's landscaping plans for review and approval by the City prior to implementation.
 Prior to the approval of the first building permit for the project, the developer, in consultation with the City of Santa Maria Community Development Department, shall identify and provide a donation to a conservation entity for monarch habitat conservation that can receive financial support to further enhance and/or promote conservation efforts in the region. The developer shall provide a d onation in an amount required by the conservation entity to fund 5 years of conservation research, restoration, site protection, and/or maintenance and management activities to the benefit of overwintering monarch butterfly habitat.

The project site suppo rts stands of trees that have historically supported an aggregation of winter roosting monarch butterflies; this site is located to the south of UVP and is 7.63 acres. The recent counts at this grove have ranged between 0 and 34 butterflies. The recorded count for 2021/2022 was 34. Nevertheless, the Xerces Society and C a. Department of Fish and Wildlife have identified and

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 11 OF 16
mapped this grove as overwintering site #2688. Retaining the 7.63-acre grove at the project site would not be feasible because the grov e would be incompatible with the proposed residential development at the project site . An arborist assessment, which supported the EIR analysis, indicates that the eucalyptus grove that provides the overwintering habitat is an old windrow of trees that has been cut down in the past and allowed to regrow out of the remaining stumps. The trees are growing very close together and the branches of each tree tangle with one another. When eucalyptus grows in very close, like the trees at the project site, the root s fuse between trees, making them one biological entity. It is not possible to remove individual trees selectively. If single trees were to be removed, the sandy soil conditions would increase the possibility of the remaining trees falling over. The trees are essentially supporting each other.

There has been no regular maintenance of the trees on the project site. Due to the health of the trees, the arborist report recommends against protection for any of the trees. Development of the site with any comparab le project of a similar density would require the removal of the monarch overwintering site . Due to the central location of the eucalyptus grove, protection of this resource, and creation of an adequate buffer zone between the project development and the g rove for resource protection and hazard abatement, would require many more acres of the project site to remain in open space than the 7.63 -acre area that delineates the grove. This type of buffer zone and protection of the grove would render a project like Richards Ranch (of a similar size and density) as infeasible to develop.

Removal of this habitat would create a significant and unavoidable impact that cannot be fully mitigated. Impacts cannot not be fully mitigated because there are no known local mitigation banks for monarch butterfly overwintering habitat, there is significant risk that restored off -site habitat would not be used by the monarch for overwintering, and there would be a significant temporal loss of the habitat while potential created or restored overwintering habitat matures. For these reasons, while mitigation is available through supporting existing conservation efforts of established habitats that are actively managed by qualified conservation entities, the City determines that feasible mitigation measures are not available to fully reduce potentially significant impacts to the monarch butterfly from loss of habitat to a less-than-significant level.

Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO/mm -1.1 through BIO/mm -1.5 and Mitigation Measure BIO/mm-2.1 will reduce impacts to the monarch butterfly and monarch butterfly habitat. Residual impacts to monarch butterflies would continue to be significant and unavoidable . This impact would be Class I, significant and unavoidable.

b. BIO Impact 13, Cumulative Impacts to Biological Resources. The project could result in cumulatively considerable impacts to biological resources. These potential impacts will be reduced to with the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO/mm-1.1 through BIO/mm-1.5, BIO/mm-2.1, BIO/mm-3.1, BIO/mm-

4.1, and BIO/mm-5.1. With implementation of the identified mitigation measures, most residual cumulative biological resource impacts would be less than significant. Howev er, development of the site under the Richards Ranch conceptual development plan or any project of a similar density would necessitate

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 12 OF 16
the removal of the 7.63-acre monarch overwintering site that exists on the project site. Removal of this habitat would cr eate a significant and unavoidable impact that cannot be fully mitigated. Impacts cannot be fully mitigated because there is a lack of information regarding the ability to develop off -site mitigation, there are no known local mitigation banks for monarch butterfly overwintering habitat, there is significant risk that restored off -site habitat would not be used by the monarch for overwintering, and there would be a significant temporal loss of the habitat while created overwintering habitat matures.

For these reasons, the City determines that feasible mitigation measures are not available to reduce potentially significant impacts to the monarch butterfly from loss of habitat to a less -than-significant level. Thus, residual cumulative impacts to monarch butterflies would continue to be significant and unavoidable with the build out of the Richards Ranch conceptual development plan. Although the project will incorporate feasible measures, the measures may not reduce impacts to less than significant. Therefore, this impact would remain significant. This impact would be Class I, significant and unavoidable.

D. Findings that with regard to certain project effects, those effects found to be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required.

The EIR identified potential impacts within fifty-two (52) topics that were found to be less than significant or no impact.

1. AESTHETICS (AES)
a. AES Impact 1 . The project will not have a substantial effect on a scenic vista; impacts will be less than significant. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

b. AES Impact 2. The project will not substantially damage scenic resources within a State Scenic Highway. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

c. AES Impact 3 . With adhere nce to the City’s development and landscape standards, the project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings, nor conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality; impacts will be less than significant. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

d. AES Impact 4 . The project will not create a new source of substantial light or glare which will adversely affect day or nighttime views in the ar ea; impacts will be less than significant. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

e. AES Impact 5 . The project will not have potential to result in cumulatively considerable impacts associated with aesthetics; impacts will be less than significant. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

2. AIR QUALITY (AQ) AND GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG)
a. AQ Impact 1 . The project will not conflict with or obstruct implementation of applicable air quality plans. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 13 OF 16

b. AQ Impact 4. The project will not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

c. GHG Impact 1 . The project will not generate greenhouse gas emissions above greenhouse gas significance thresholds. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

3. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (BIO)
a. BIO Impact 6. Project operation will not directly or indirectly impact special-status wildlife species. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

b. BIO Impact 8. There is no riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities located within the project site; no impacts will occur. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

c. BIO Impact 9. There are no jurisdictional wetlands located within the project site; no impacts will occur. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

d. BIO Impact 10 . No impacts will occur to migratory w ildlife corridors or native wildlife nurseries. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

e. BIO Impact 12 . The project will not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

4. CULTURAL (CR) AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES (TCR)
a. CR Impact 1 . The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

5. ENERGY (EN)
a. EN Impact 3 . The project will not result in cumulatively considerable impacts associated with energy. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS (GEO)
a. GEO Impact 1 . The project will not cause substantial adverse effects due to rupture of a known earthquake fault; impacts will be less than significant. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

b. GEO Impact 4 . The project will not cause potential substantial adverse effects involving landslides. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

c. GEO Impact 7 . The project will not result in substantial risks to life or property associated with expansive soils. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

d. GEO Impact 8. The project will not result in impacts associated with soil capability

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 14 OF 16
of supporting the use of wastewater disposal systems. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (HAZ)
a. HAZ Impact 1. The project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials.

This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

b. HAZ Impact 3 . The project will not introduce hazardous materials within 0.25 miles of an existing or proposed school; impacts related to hazardous emissions and handling of hazardous materials near schools will be less than significant.

This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

c. HAZ Impact 4. The project will not be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

d. HAZ Impact 6. The project will not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response or emergency evacuation plan. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY (HYD)
a. HYD Impact 3 . Implementation of the project will not substantially decrease groundwater supplies and impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

b. HYD Impact 4 . The project will not interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

c. HYD Impact 6 . The project site is not in a flood hazard zone, tsunami zone, or seiche zone and, therefore, there will be no risk of release of pollutants due to project inundation by these hazards. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

9. LAND USE AND PLANNING (LUP)
a. LUP Impact 1. The project will not include features that will physically divide an established community. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

b. LUP Impact 2. The project will not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

c. LUP Impact 3 . The project will not result in cumulatively considerable impacts associated with land use and planning. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

10. NOISE (NOI)
a. NOI Impact 2. The project will not generate excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 15 OF 16

b. NOI Impact 3. The project will not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

11. POPULATION AND HOUSING (PH)
a. PH Impact 1 . The project will not result in substantial unplanned population growth; impacts will be less than significant. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

b. PH Impact 2 . The project will not displace substantial numbers of persons or housing; no impact will occur. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

c. PH Impact 3. Cumulative effects of the proposed project will not occur because the project will not displace persons or housing nor will result in unplanned growth; cumulative impacts related to population growth will not occur. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

12. PUBLIC SERVICES AND RECREATION (PS)
a. PS Impact 1. The project will not require the provision of new or physically altered fire protection facilities; therefore, there will be no environmental impacts associated with the provision of fire protection facilities to serve the project site and environmental impacts will be considered less than significant. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

b. PS Impact 2. The project will not require the provision of new or physically altered police protection facilities. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

c. PS Impact 3. Implementation of the project will result in an increased demand on existing Orcutt Union School District ( OUSD) and Santa Maria Joint Union High School District ( SMJUHSD) facilities. However, the project will not require the provision of new or physically altered school facilities. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

d. PS Impact 4. The project will not require the provision of new or physically altered public library facilities. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

e. PS Impact 5. The project will not require the provision of new or physically altered park facilities beyond the 43.75 -acre project site that could result in additional environmental impacts. This impact will be Class IV, of no impact.

f. PS Impact 6 . The project will not result in substantial physical deterioration of existing parks and recreation facilities; the impact will be less than significant. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

g. PS Impact 7. The project will not include the development of recreational facilities that may have an adverse physical effect on the environment. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

h. PS Impact 8 . The project will not result in cumulatively considerable

ATTACHMENT D

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS
PAGE 16 OF 16
environmental impacts related to the provision of public services and recreation.

This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

13. TRANSPORTATION (TR)
a. TR Impact 1. The project will not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

b. TR Impact 2. The project will not conflict or be inconsistent with State California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15064.3(b). This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

c. TR Impact 3 . The project will not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

d. TR Impact 4 . The project will not result in inadequate emergency access. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

e. TR Impact 5 . The project will not have potential to result in cumulatively considerable impacts associated with transportation; impacts will be less than significant. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

14. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS (USS)
a. USS Impact 2. Golden State Water will have sufficient water supply to serve the water demand generated by the proposed project and the existing service area during normal, single dry year, and multiple dry years conditions. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

b. USS Impact 3. The Laguna County Sanitation District will have adequate capacity to serve the increase in wastewater flows generated by the project. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

c. USS Impact 4. The project will not generate solid waste in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure or otherwise impair state or local solid waste reduction goals.

This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

d. USS Impact 5. The project will comply with federal, state, and local solid waste reduction goals. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

e. USS Impact 6. The project will not result in a cumulatively considerable impact to utilities and service systems. This impact will be Class III, less than significant.

STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PAGE 1 OF 3

ATTACHMENT E

RICHARDS RANCH ANNEXATION, GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENT

AND PRE-ZONING PROJECT

Statement of Overriding Considerations

The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Richards Ranch Annexation, General Plan Land Use Amendment and Pre -zoning project (July 2024) identifies significant, unavoidable biological impacts associated with the proposed project. Mitigation measures to reduce these impacts have been applied to the project to the extent feasible but would not reduce the environmental impact s below the identified criteria used to define significant impacts.

The City Council of the City of Santa Maria finds that the benefits of the proposed project outweigh the significant unavoidable impact s as required by Section 21081(b) of the California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council makes the findings that the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations set out below, which may include considerations for the provision of housing and employment opportunities for trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures and alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. In addition to the findings set forth in Attachment D of the Planning Commission staff report dated October 2, 2024, the City Council makes the following findings of overriding considerations that warrant approval of the proposed project, notwithstanding the identified biological impacts that are not fully mitigated:

1. The proposed project site lies within the City of Santa Maria's Sphere of Influence and is contiguous with the city's western border. The site's vacant status and its potential for imminent urban infill development make it a suitable candidate f or annexation. The decision to annex the site to the city is driven by the aim to achieve more efficient long-term growth by leveraging access to municipal services. This is an overriding economic and social consideration in favor of approving the proposed project.

2. The Richards Ranch project would allow for an economically feasible plan that is compatible with the surrounding community and designed to serve the housing and commercial needs of the city and region. As envisioned by the conceptual development plan analyzed in the EIR, the project will provide potential future development of 106,800 -square-feet of commercial uses and a 39,500 -square- foot mini -storage complex on 16.35 acres of the project site, as well as 400 apartments and 95 townhomes on the remaining 27.40 acres . The project would develop this infill property while respecting the surrounding existing neighborhoods and would provide high-density housing to meet the housing needs in the city and surrounding areas. The project would also provide commercial uses that will serve the daily needs of the new residents and the surrounding community including those traveling on Union Valley Parkway . These are overriding economic and social considerations in favor of approving the proposed project.

STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PAGE 2 OF 3

3. The Richards Ranch project would provide for the orderly development of the City of Santa Maria General Plan planning area by providing the effective and efficient development of public facilities, infrastructure, and services appropriate for the planning area while also providing the City with increased sales tax and property tax. The proposed urban infill project in the City of Santa Maria's Sphere of Influence encourages community -centered development by facilitating the establishment of community -serving commercial retail spaces and providing a diverse mix of housing types to meet the City's Regional Housing Needs Allocation targets.

The additional residential development would increase the housing supply within Santa Maria, w hich is consistent with Goal 1 of the General Plan (Housing Element) to “Assure sufficient development potential to accommodate future residential growth and construction”, and Goal LU-9 of the General Plan (Land Use Element), to “Promote Adequ ate Housing Supply – the City will continue to promote an adequate supply of quality residential development within Santa Maria.” The additional residential development on the site would provide needed housing stock in Santa Maria and assist with the curre nt housing shortage in the State of California. This project is also consistent with the General Plan (Land Use Element) Policy L.U.1 to “Establish and maintain a balanced mix of land uses to meet the present and future demands of the community”, and Objective L.U.1a to “Establish residential areas for 1) the provision of a variety of home sites, housing types, and lifestyles; 2) the promotion of neighborhood integrity; and 3) the protection of individual property values by encouraging compatible uses and proper standards for design and development.” This is an overriding economic and social consideration in favor of approving the proposed project.

4. The project would be consistent with Program 1.F of the City’s Housing Element, which acknowledges that annexation can provide an opportunity for the City to add available residential sites. The project site is surrounded by other residential development and would not constitute leapfrog development. Therefore, the project would be consistent with the City of San ta Maria’s Land Use Element Objective L.U. 5d, to locate new development contiguous to existing development.

This is an overriding economic and social consideration in favor of approving the proposed project.

5. A notable factor influencing the annexation request is the region's historical lack of water resources, which has impeded the development of the site for 20 years.

Despite being planned for mixed -use development for an extended period and previous attempts by various owners to develop the site over the past two decades, the lack of water resources within the county has posed a significant challenge. However, the City of Santa Maria possesses the necessary water resources to support the proposed development, making annexation a feasible solution to address the water scarcity challenge and finally bring the long-planned project to fruition. This is an overriding economic and social consideration in favor of approving the proposed project.

STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PAGE 3 OF 3

6. The future development of the property would provide for additio nal employment opportunities in the Santa Maria and Orcutt area. Proposed commercial uses include drive-through commercial spaces, a retail center, corner gas station, and mini storage. Approximately 485 new jobs are expected to be created. This is an overriding economic and social consideration in favor of approving the proposed project.

7. The project site supports stands of trees that have historically supported an aggregation of winter roosting monarch butterflies; this site is located to the south of UVP and is 7.63-acres. The recent counts at this grove have ranged between 0 and 34 butterflies. The recorded count for 2021/2022 was 34. The Xerces Society and Ca. Department of Fish and Wildlife have identified and mapped this grove as overwintering site #2 688. A range of alternatives were examined in the EIR to address the significant and unavoidable impacts to the Western monarch butterfly resulting from buildout of the project site as depicted in the conceptual development plan. Any development of the Ric hards Ranch site of a density lik e that is proposed in the conceptual development plan, regardless of land use type, would require removal of the eucalyptus grove that provides overwintering habitat to the monarch butterfly. The 7.63-acre grove, which provides the overwintering habitat for butterflies at the project site, would be incompatible with the proposed residential development at the project site.

An arborist assessment, which supported the EIR analysis, indicates that the eucalyptus grove is an old windrow of trees that has been cut down at some point and allowed to regrow out of the remaining stumps. The trees are growing very close together and the branches of each tree tangle with one another. When eucalyptus grows in very close, like the trees at the project site, the roots fuse between trees, making them one biological entity. It is not possible to remove individual trees selectively. If single tr ees were to be removed, the sandy soil conditions would increase the possibility of the remaining trees falling over. The trees are essentially supporting each other. There has been no regular maintenance of the trees on the project site. Due to the health of the trees, the arborist report recommends against protection for any of the trees.

Development of the site with any comparable project of a similar density as depicted in the conceptual development plan would require the removal of the monarch overwintering site. Due to the central location of the eucalyptus grove , the protection of this resource and creation of an adequate buffer zone between the project development and the grove for resource protection and hazard abatement would be infeasible. This is an overriding economic and social consideration in favor of approving the proposed project.

1 ATTACHMENT F

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

1.1 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
When a Lead Agency makes findings on significant environmental effects identified in an Environmental Impact Report ( EIR), the agency must also adopt a “reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment” (Public Resources C ode [PRC] Section 21081.6(a) and California Environmental Quality Act [ CEQA] Guidelines Sections 15091(d) and 15097). The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is implemented to ensure that the mitigation measures and project revisions identified in the EIR are implemented.

Therefore, the MMRP must include all changes in the proposed project either adopted by the project proponent or made conditions of approval by the Lead or Responsible Agency.

1.2 ADMINISTRATION OF TH E MITIGATION MONITOR ING

AND REPORTING PROGRAM
The City of Santa Maria (City) is the Lead Agency responsible for the adoption of the MMRP.

Richards Ranch, LLC (Applicant), is responsible for implementation of the MMRP, in coordination with the City and other identified entities. According to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15097(a), a public agency may delegate reporting or monitoring responsibilities to another public agency or to a private entity that accepts the delegation. The City may delegate responsibility for verifying and documenting compliance with the MMRP to the Applicant as coordinator of the project and its construction, and the Applicant will be responsible for compliance. However, until mitigation measures have been completed, the City, as the Lead Agency, remains responsible for ensuring that the implementation of the measures occurs in accordance with the program.

1.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
Table 1-1 is structured to enable quick reference to mitigation measures and the associated monitoring program based on the environmental resource. The numbering of mitigation measures correlates with numbering of measures found in Chapter 4, Environmental Impact Analysis, of the EIR.

Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
2 Table 1-1. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
AQ/mm-2.1 The following construction mitigation measures shall be implemented to minimize short- term construction emissions. All measures shall be shown on grading and building plans. a. During construction, use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this should include wetting down such areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day. Increased watering frequency should be required whenever the wind speed exceeds 15 miles per hour. Reclaimed water should be used whenever reasonably available. However, reclaimed water should not be used in or around crops for human consumption. b. Minimize amount of disturbed area and reduce onsite vehicle speeds to 15 mph or less.
c. If importation, exportation, and stockpiling of fill material is involved, soil stockpiled for more than 2 days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. Trucks transporting fill material to and from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin. d. Gravel pads shall be installed at all access points to prevent tracking of mud onto public roads.
e. After clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation is completed, treat the disturbed area by watering, or revegetating, or by spreading soil binders until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. f. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust offsite. Their duties shall include holiday and weekend periods when work may not be in progress. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the SBCAPCD prior to grading/building permit issuance and/or map clearance.

All measures shall
be shown on
grading and
building plans
Prior to issuance of
construction,
grading, and/or
building permits
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
AQ/mm-2.2 The following measures shall be implemented to reduce mobile-source emissions:
a. All portable diesel-powered construction equipment shall be registered with the state’s portable equipment registration program or shall obtain an SBCAPCD permit.
b. Fleet owners of mobile construction equipment are subject to the CARB Regulation for In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicles (Title 13, California Code of Regulations [CCR] §2449), the purpose of which is to reduce NOx, DPM, and other criteria pollutant emissions from in-use off-road diesel-fueled vehicles.

Off-road heavy-duty trucks shall comply with the State Off-Road Regulation. c. Fleet owners of mobile construction equipment are subject to the CARB Regulation for In-Use (On-Road) Heavy-Duty Diesel-Fueled Vehicles (13 CCR 2025), the purpose of which is to reduce DPM, NOx, and other criteria Measures shall be
shown on grading
and building plans
and implemented
during equipment
use on the project
site
Prior to issuance of
construction,
grading, and/or
building permits and
during construction
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
3 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
pollutants from in-use (on-road) diesel-fueled vehicles. On-road heavy-duty trucks shall comply with the State On-Road Regulation.
d. All commercial off-road and on-road diesel vehicles are subject, respectively, to Title 13, CCR §2449(d)(3) and §2485, limiting engine idling time. Idling of heavy-duty diesel construction equipment and trucks during loading and unloading shall be limited to 5 minutes; electric auxiliary power units should be used whenever locally available.
e. Diesel equipment meeting the CARB Tier 3 or higher emission standards for off-road heavy-duty diesel engines shall be used to the extent locally available. f. On-road heavy-duty equipment with model year 2010 engines or newer shall be used to the extent locally available.
g. Diesel-powered equipment shall be replaced by electric equipment whenever available.
h. Equipment/vehicles using alternative fuels, such as compressed natural gas, liquefied natural gas, propane, or biodiesel, shall be used onsite where locally available.
i. Catalytic converters shall be installed on gasoline-powered equipment, if available, and in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations. j. All construction equipment shall be maintained in tune per the manufacturer’s specifications.
k. The engine size of construction equipment shall be the minimum practical size. l. The number of construction equipment operating simultaneously shall be minimized through efficient management practices to ensure that the smallest practical number is operating at any one time.
m. Construction worker trips should be minimized by requiring carpooling and by providing for lunch onsite.

GHG/mm-2.1 The project shall include the following design features to encourage the use of alternate transportation modes and reduce mobile-source emissions:
a. Provide a pedestrian-friendly and interconnected streetscape with good access to/from the development for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users to make alternative transportation more convenient, comfortable, and safe. b. Incorporate traffic calming modifications to project roads to reduce vehicle speeds and increase pedestrian and bicycle usage and safety. c. Provide employee lockers and showers to promote bicycle and pedestrian use.

One shower and five lockers for every 25 new employees is recommended. d. Increase bicycle accessibility and safety in the vicinity of the project; for example: provide interconnected bicycle routes/lanes or construction of bikeways.
e. Exceed Cal Green standards by 25% for providing onsite bicycle parking: both short-term racks and long-term lockers, or a locked room with standard racks and access limited to bicyclists only.

Measures shall be
shown on final
building plans
Prior to issuance of
building permits
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
4 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
f. Meet current CALGreen Tier 2 standards for electric vehicle (EV) parking spaces, except that all EV parking spaces required by the code to be EV capable shall instead be EV ready.

GHG/mm-2.2 The servicing of residential development by natural gas shall be prohibited.

Natural gas service for commercial development shall only be allowed if the following measures are implemented:
a. The electrical systems for commercial land uses shall be designed with sufficient capacity and all prewiring necessary to accommodate the future retrofit to all-electric (e.g., such that electric space heating, water heating, and cooking appliances could be installed).
b. A GHG-reduction plan shall be prepared and implemented. The GHG-reduction plan shall identify additional on-site and/or off-site GHG-reduction measures to be implemented sufficient to fully offset GHG emissions associated with natural gas service to commercial land uses. The GHG-reduction plan shall be submitted to City planning staff for review and approval prior to issuance of building construction permits. Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4, subdivisions (c)(3) and (c)(4), respectively, a project’s GHG emissions can be reduced by off-site measures, including offsets that are not otherwise required and measures that sequester GHGs. If feasible on-site GHG-reduction measures are insufficient to reduce operational GHG emissions to below the GHG threshold of significance, off-site mitigation measures may be included.

Off-site mitigation measures may include “Direct Reduction Activities” or the purchase of “Carbon Offset Credits” as discussed below:

Direct Reduction Activities
Directly undertake or fund activities that will reduce or sequester GHG emissions. GHG reduction credits shall achieve GHG emission reductions that are real, permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, enforceable, in accordance with the criteria set forth in the ARB’s most recent Process for the Review and Approval of Compliance Offset Protocols in Support of the Cap-and-Trade Regulation (2013). GHG reduction credits shall be undertaken for the specific purpose of reduction project-generated GHG emissions and shall not include reductions that would otherwise be required by law. All Direct Reduction Activities and associated reduction credits shall be confirmed by an independent, qualified third-party. The “Direct Reduction Activity” shall be registered with an ARB-approved registry and in compliance with ARB-approved protocols. In accordance with the applicable Registry requirements, the project developer (or its designee) shall retain an independent, qualified third-party to confirm the GHG emissions reduction or sequestration achieved by the Direct GHG Reduction Activities against the applicable Registry protocol or methodology. The project developer (or its designee) will then apply for issuance of carbon credits in accordance with the applicable Registry rules.

Compliance shall
be verified upon
inspection
Prior to building
occupancy
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
5 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
Carbon Offsets
Obtain and retire “Carbon Offsets.” Carbon Offsets shall achieve GHG reductions that are real, permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, and enforceable. Carbon offsets shall be purchased from ARB-approved registries and shall comply with ARB-approved protocols to ensure that offset credits accurately and reliably represent actual emissions reductions. If the purchase of carbon offsets is selected, offsets shall be purchased according to the following order of preference: (1) within the SBAPCD jurisdictional area; (2) within the State of California; then (3) elsewhere in the United States. In the event that a project or program providing offsets to the project developer loses its accreditation, the project developer shall comply with the rules and procedures of retiring offsets specific to the registry involved and shall purchase an equivalent number of credits to recoup the loss.

Biological Resources
BIO/mm-1.1 Prohibition of Invasive Plants. The landscape architect shall provide a signed statement on the landscape plans that the planting plan does not include any plant that occurs on the California Exotic Pest Plant Council and the California Invasive Plant Council Lists 1, 2, and 4. Plants considered to be invasive by the California Exotic Pest Plant Council and the California Invasive Plant Council shall not be used onsite.

Provide a signed
statement on the
landscape plans
that the planting
plan does not
include exotic plant
species
Prior to issuance of
building permits
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
BIO/mm-1.2 Biological Monitor. Prior to grading or building permit issuance for any future development within the project site, the developer shall retain a City-approved project biologist to provide monitoring services for all measures requiring biological mitigation. The biologist shall be responsible for ensuring that compliance with biological resource mitigation measures occurs, conducting construction crew training regarding sensitive species that have the potential to occur, maintaining the authority to stop work, and outlining actions in the event of non-compliance. Biological monitoring shall be conducted full time during the initial disturbances (site clearing) and be reduced to monthly following initial disturbances, or more frequently, if necessary, as determined by the City-approved project biologist.

Retain a City-
approved project
biologist to ensure
compliance with
biological resource
mitigation
measures
Prior to grading or
building permit
issuance for any
future development
within the project
site
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
6 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
BIO/mm-1.3 Worker Environmental Training Program. Prior to implementation of construction activities (including staging and mobilization), the developer shall ensure all personnel associated with project construction attend a training to facilitate Worker Environmental Training. The Worker Environmental Training shall be conducted by a City-approved biologist to help workers recognize special-status plants and animals to be protected in the project site.

The training program shall include identification of relevant sensitive species and habitats, description of the regulatory status and general ecological characteristics of sensitive resources, documentation of each employee's participation in trainings and information presented. Any future contractor and/or subcontractor with employees working at the project site shall set aside time for the City-approved biologist to provide Worker Environmental Training for all employees that will be onsite. Topics will include regulatory framework and best practices to avoid and minimize impacts to protected plants, animals, and their habitats. Each group of new personnel or individuals shall be provided with an environmental briefing by the City-approved project biologist.

Project personnel
shall attend a
Worker
Environmental
Training and
provide
documentation of
participation in
trainings and
information
presented.

Prior to
implementation of
construction
activities (including
staging and
mobilization) on the
project site
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
BIO/mm-1.4 Cover Excavations. During construction, all trenches, holes, and other excavations with sidewalls steeper than a 1:1 (45 degree) slope and 2 or more feet deep shall be covered when workers or equipment are not actively working in the excavation. If any such excavations remain uncovered, they shall have an escape ramp of earth or a non-slip material with a 1:1 (45 degree) slope or flatter. All excavated areas shall be inspected by the City-approved biologist before backfilling.

Cover trenches,
holes, and other
excavations when
workers or
equipment are not
actively working in
the excavation
During construction
activities on the
project site
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
BIO/mm-1.5 Biodegradable Erosion Control. During construction, use erosion control products made of natural fiber (biodegradable) to prevent wildlife from getting ensnared or strangled by monofilament, coir rolls, erosion control mats or blankets, straw or fiber wattles, or similar erosion control products.

Use erosion control
products made of
natural fiber
During construction
activities on the
project site
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
BIO/mm-2.1 The developer shall ensure the following actions are undertaken to minimize potential direct and indirect impacts to western monarch butterflies:
a. If possible, site disturbance and construction activity that would impact eucalyptus trees onsite shall not occur during the monarch butterflies' fall and winter migration period (October 15 through February 29). b. If tree or vegetation removal or site disturbance is required during the monarch butterflies’ fall and winter migration period (October 15 through February 29), a City-approved biologist familiar with monarchs and monarch overwintering habitat shall conduct focused surveys for monarch colonies within the identified overwintering site and will identify any colonies found within 7 days of proposed vegetation removal or site disturbance or when known monarch overwintering is occurring at other locations within the region. If monarch butterflies are detected, development shall be postponed until after the overwintering period or until the City-approved biologist determines monarch butterflies are no longer using the trees for overwintering.

Avoid site
disturbance and
construction activity
that would impact
eucalyptus trees
between October
15 and February

29. If this is not
possible, conduct a
preconstruction
survey for monarch
butterflies.

Implement other
mitigation and
conservation
actions prior to
Conservation
activities shall occur
prior to final
permitting. Site
disturbance and
construction activity
that would impact
eucalyptus trees,
between October 15
and February 29 as
described
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
7 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
c. To provide further protection to non-overwintering populations and/or adjacent over-wintering populations, no Asclepias curassavica (tropical milkweed) will be allowed in any planting palettes for the project. Native milkweed species, such as Asclepias fascicularis (narrowleaf milkweed) are also not recommended by the USFWS to be planted adjacent to existing overwintering sites as this may interfere with normal migrating behavior (USFWS 2023b). To contribute to local monarch butterfly conservation efforts, native nectar-providing plant species will be incorporated into landscaping following construction activities, such as those recommended in the Monarch Butterfly Nectar Plant List for Conservation Plantings, to enhance local nectar sources (Xerces Society 2018).

In addition, as a condition of approval for the Planned Development permit(s), the use of neonicotinoids and synthetic pesticides shall be prohibited in the initial project plantings and throughout the life of the project in open space, pocket parks, and other common landscaped areas. This condition shall apply to the common open spaces for the life of the project and shall be included in the CC&Rs which will be recorded against the property prior to the issuance of a first certificate of occupancy. In addition, future residents and occupants shall be encouraged to not used neonicotinoids, synthetic pesticides, and/or plants treated with these materials; residents and occupants will be provided educational materials describing 1) viable alternatives to these products, and 2) the detrimental effects of these products on butterflies and other pollinators. d. Prior to the approval of a Planned Development permit and prior to the removal of any trees within the overwintering site, the developer shall hire a City- approved biologist familiar with monarchs and monarch overwintering habitat to prepare and implement a monarch butterfly habitat enhancement plan. At a minimum, the plan shall identify area(s) on the property appropriate for onsite habitat enhancement to partially address the direct impacts of tree removal.

The recommendations in this plan shall be included within the project's future project's landscaping plans for review and approval by the City prior to implementation.
e. Prior to the approval of the first building permit for the project, the developer, in consultation with the City of Santa Maria Community Development Department, shall identify and provide a donation to a Qualified and Suitable Conservation Entity for monarch habitat conservation that can receive financial support to further enhance and/or promote conservation efforts in the region. A Qualified and Suitable Conservation Entity is defined as a conservation or government organization that:
i. Has an established preserve in Santa Barbara or San Luis Obispo Counties within the ecological range of overwintering monarch butterfly that is dedicated to conservation purposes and is actively managing lands or resources for conservation in Santa Barbara or San Luis Obispo County;
ii. Has specific experience and/or land holdings with monarch butterfly and their habitats; and
iii. Can specifically identify at least 7.6 acres of habitats within their preserve(s) to be managed or enhanced as regionally significant permits, as
specified.

Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
8 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
monarch overwintering habitat within the Santa Barbara or San Luis Obispo County area.

The developer shall provide a donation in an amount required by the Suitable Conservation Entity to fund 5 years of conservation research, restoration, site protection, and/or maintenance and management activities to the benefit of overwintering monarch butterfly habitat. Examples of funding opportunities would be for use in maintenance of existing grove trees, exotic species control, native grove tree planting and/or replacement of eucalyptus trees with native tree species, planting of understories with native plant communities, general grove habitat maintenance, and/or qualitative and quantitative monitoring efforts over a 5-year period. These efforts may also contribute to improving scientific studies on monarch butterflies and their conservation in the city and/or Santa Barbara or San Luis Obispo County.

A copy of the final executed agreement between the developer and the Qualified and Suitable Conservation Entity shall be submitted to the City prior to the City’s issuance of the first building permit for the Richards Ranch project.

BIO/mm-3.1 Within 30 days prior to and during initial ground disturbance of the coastal scrub and grassland habitat onsite, a City-approved biologist shall conduct surveys for northern California legless lizards within suitable habitat areas within the development footprint and any adjacent staging areas. Prior to initial ground disturbance, the City-approved biologist shall identify an appropriate receptor site with suitable habitat for any northern California legless lizards that may be found during the survey. The biologist shall use hand search or cover board methods in areas of disturbance where legless lizards are expected to be found (e.g., under shrubs, other vegetation, or debris). If cover board methods are used, they shall commence at least 30 days prior to the start of construction.

Hand search surveys shall be completed immediately prior to and during disturbances to the vegetated areas. During vegetation-disturbing activities, the biologist shall walk behind the equipment to capture northern California legless lizards that are unearthed by the equipment. The biologist shall capture and relocate any legless lizards or other reptiles observed during the survey effort. The captured individuals shall be relocated from the construction area and released at the predetermined receptor site.

Conduct surveys
for northern
California legless
lizards and
incorporate
additional
survey/relocation
measures as
required.

Within 30 days prior
to and during initial
ground disturbance
of the coastal scrub
and grassland
habitat
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
BIO/mm-4.1 Vegetation removal and initial site disturbance shall be conducted between September 1 and January 31 outside of the nesting season for birds. If vegetation and/or tree removal is planned for the bird nesting season (February 1 to August 31), then preconstruction nesting bird surveys shall be conducted by a City-approved biologist to determine if any active nests would be impacted by project construction. If no active nests are found, then no further mitigation shall be required. If any active nests are found that would be impacted by construction, then the nest sites shall be avoided with the establishment of a non-disturbance buffer zone around active nests as determined by the City-approved biologist. Nest sites shall be avoided and protected with the non-disturbance buffer zone until the adults and young of the year are no longer reliant on the nest site for survival, as determined by the monitoring biologist.

Conduct vegetation
removal and site
distance between
September 1 and
January 31. If this
is not possible,
conduct
preconstruction
nesting bird
surveys.

During construction
activities on the
project site, between
February 1 and
August 31.

Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
9 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
BIO/mm-5.1 The developer shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct roosting bat surveys prior to any tree removal. Pre-disturbance surveys for bats shall include two daytime and two dusk surveys no more than 30 days prior to the tree removal to determine if bats are roosting in the trees. The biologist(s) conducting the preconstruction surveys shall identify the nature of the bat utilization of the area (i.e., no roosting, night roost, day roost, maternity roost). If bats are found to be roosting in the project area, the developer shall develop the project in such a way that avoids the bat roost. If avoidance of the bat roost is not feasible, tree removal shall be delayed until the bats have left the area.

Conduct roosting
bat surveys and
incorporate
avoidance
measures as
required.

Prior to any tree
removal on the
project site
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
BIO/mm-11.1 Prior to approval of a Planned Development Permit, the developer shall retain a City- approved biologist or arborist to prepare a tree protection, replacement and monitoring program or another mechanism that ensures consistency with RME Goal 3 and Policy 3, and compliance with the City’s Municipal Code.

The tree protection, replacement, and monitoring program shall include a tree survey report identifying the number, size, species, and status (live, dead, diseased, etc.) of trees to be protected in place, trees to be trimmed and/or pruned, and trees to be removed. The program shall demonstrate protection of existing trees with a trunk diameter of 6 inches or greater to the greatest extent feasible, in accordance with Municipal Code Section 12-44.4.

Trees to be protected in place shall have high-visibility exclusion fencing placed around their critical root zone during project site disturbance, grading, and construction activities.

Pavement within the canopy dripline of existing trees to be protected in place should not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the area of the canopy. All trees planted as mitigation shall have an 80% survival rate after 5 years. If the survival rate is not at least 80%, then enough trees shall be replanted to bring the total number of survived specimens to at least 80% of the original number of trees planted, as measured 5 years after the replanting. Annual monitoring reports that evaluate tree survivability, health and vigor shall be prepared by a qualified specialist and submitted to the City by October 15 each year, for 5 years. The project shall comply with City of Santa Maria Municipal Code Chapter 12-44 as it pertains to tree protection. Requirements shall include but not be limited to: construction setbacks to protection retained trees; construction fencing around trees; grading limits around the base of trees as required; and a replacement plan for trees removed.

The final report shall include the final number of replacement trees utilizing the City’s replacement ratio identified above. The developer shall submit a copy of the building and grading plans to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of building or grading permits. Prior to site occupancy trees shall be planted, fenced, and appropriately irrigated.

City Parks Department staff or a City-approved biologist shall verify that the tree protection, replacement, and monitoring program is adequate. The City shall conduct site inspections throughout all phases of development to ensure compliance with and evaluate all tree preservation and replacement measures.

Retain a City-
approved biologist
or arborist to
prepare a tree
protection,
replacement and
monitoring program
Prior to approval of a
Planned
Development Permit
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
10 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
Cultural Resources
CR/mm-2.1 In the unlikely event that archaeological resources are exposed during project implementation, work should stop in the immediate vicinity, and an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards (National Park Service 1983) should be retained to evaluate the find and recommend relevant mitigation measures. If additional measures are deemed necessary, the measures recommended by the qualified archaeologist shall be implemented. In the event that human remains are discovered, State of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 shall be followed.

Immediately cease
work in the vicinity
of an
archaeological
resource find and
retain a qualified
archaeologist to
assess the find.

During ground
disturbing and
construction
activities on the
project site
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
Energy
EN/mm-1.1 The project shall include the following measures:
a. Meet or exceed CalGreen Tier 2 standards at the time of development for building energy efficiency.
b. Meet or exceed CalGreen building standards at the time of development for water conservation (e.g., use of low-flow water fixtures, water-efficient irrigation systems, and drought-tolerant landscaping.
c. All built-in appliances shall be Energy Star certified or equivalent. d. To the extent allowed by the building code at the time of development, incorporate natural lighting in buildings to minimize daytime lighting demand. e. Outdoor lighting shall be designed to minimize electrical demand, such as the use of solar-powered lighting and lighting controlled by motion sensors. f. Proposed residential and non-residential land uses shall elect to receive electricity from Central Coast Community Energy (CCCE) with Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) being responsible for the delivery and installation of electrical lines.

Measures shall be
shown on final
building plans
Prior to issuance of
building permits
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
Geology and Soils
GEO/mm-2.1 Prior to issuance of grading permits for site preparation activities, the following measures shall be incorporated into project site preparation/grading plans, to be verified by the City Building Division:
a. The existing ground surface in the building and surface improvements areas shall be prepared for construction by removing existing improvements, vegetation, large roots, debris, and other deleterious material. Any existing fill soils shall be completely removed and replaced as compacted fill. Any existing utilities that will not remain in service shall be removed or abandoned in a manner approved by a geotechnical engineer.
b. Voids created by the removal of materials or utilities, and extending below the recommended overexcavation depth, shall be immediately called to the attention of the geotechnical engineer. No fill shall be placed unless the geotechnical engineer has observed the underlying soil.

Measures shall be
shown on
preparation/grading
plans, to be verified
by the City Building
Division
Prior to issuance of
grading permits for
site preparation
activities
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Building Division
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
11 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
GEO/mm-2.2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following measures shall be incorporated into the project grading plans, to be verified by the City Building Division:
a. Following site preparation, the soils in the building area for one- and two-story buildings shall be removed to a level plane at a minimum depth of 3 feet below the bottom of the deepest footing or 4 feet below existing grade, whichever is deeper. The soils in the building area for three-story buildings shall be removed to a level plane at a minimum depth of 4 feet below the bottom of the deepest footing or 5 feet below existing grade, whichever is deeper. During construction, locally deeper removals may be recommended. b. All cut or cut/fill transition areas shall be overexcavated such that a minimum of 5 feet of compacted fill is provided within all the one- to two-story building areas and a minimum of 6 feet of compacted fill is provided within all the three-story building areas. Also, the minimum depth of the fill below the building area shall not be less than half of the maximum depth of fill below the building area. For example, if the maximum depth of fill below the building area is 10 feet, then the minimum depth of fill below the same building area grades shall be no less than 5 feet. In no case shall the depth of fill be less than 5 feet on the building areas.
c. Following site preparation, the soils in the surface improvement area shall be removed to a level plane at a minimum depth of 1 foot below the proposed subgrade elevation or 2 feet below the existing ground surface, whichever is deeper. During construction, locally deeper removals may be recommended based on field conditions. The resulting soil surface shall then be scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted prior to placing any fill soil. d. Following site preparation, the soils in fill areas beyond the building and surface improvement areas shall be removed to a depth of 2 feet below existing grade.

During construction, locally deeper removals may be recommended based on field conditions. The resulting soil surface shall then be scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted prior to placing any fill soil. e. Voids created by dislodging cobbles and/or debris during scarification shall be backfilled and compacted, and the dislodged materials shall be removed from the area of work.
f. On-site material and approved import materials may be used as general fill. All imported soil shall be nonexpansive. The proposed imported soils shall be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer before being used, and on an intermittent basis during placement on the site.
g. All materials used as fill shall be cleaned of any debris and rocks larger than 6 inches in diameter. No rocks larger than 3 inches in diameter shall be used within the upper 3 feet of finish grade. When fill material includes rocks, the rocks shall be placed in a sufficient soil matrix to ensure that voids caused by nesting of the rocks will not occur and that the fill can be properly compacted. h. Where fill will be placed on existing slopes that are steeper than 10 percent, the slope shall be cut to level benches into competent material. The benches shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and angled 2 to 3 percent back into the slope.

Measures shall be
shown on grading
plans, to be verified
by the City Building
Division
Prior to issuance of
grading permits
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Building Division
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
12 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
Where fill is planned on existing slopes that are steeper than 20 percent, the toe of the fill shall be keyed into competent material. The keyway shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide or the width shall equal one-half the height of the slope, whichever is greater. The keyway shall be angled 2 to 3 percent back into the slope and shall penetrate 2 feet into the competent material.

The geotechnical engineer shall observe all keyways and benches. i. Backdrains shall be provided in all keyways and on benches at approximately 10-foot vertical intervals, unless otherwise recommended by the geotechnical engineer at the time of construction.
j. Slopes shall be constructed at 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter inclinations.

Slopes subject to inundation shall be constructed at 3:1 or flatter. Cut slopes and fill over cut slopes shall be overexcavated and constructed as compacted fill slopes.
k. Unless otherwise recommended by the landscape architect, completely constructed fill slopes shall be covered with a synthetic vegetation matting and the slopes shall be revegetated, in accordance with the installation requirements of the manufacturer and the CBC.

GEO/mm-2.3 Prior to issuance of building permits for habitable structures on-site, the following design measures shall be incorporated into the project building plans, to be verified by the City Building Division:
a. Conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on soil compacted per the “Grading” section of the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared for the project (Earth Systems Pacific 2021) shall be used to support structures. Grade beams shall also be placed across all large entrances to support structures.

Footings and grade beams shall have a minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent grade; however, footings and grade beams for the two- and three-story building shall have a minimum depth of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. All spread footings shall be a minimum of 2 square feet.

Footing and grade beam dimensions shall also conform to the applicable requirements of Section 1809 (CBC CBSC, 2022 2019). Footing and grade beam reinforcement shall be in accordance with the requirements of the architect/engineer; minimum continuous footing and grade beam reinforcement shall consist of two No. 4 rebar, one near the top and one near the bottom of the footing or grade beam.
b. Footings shall be designed using a maximum allowable bearing capacity of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) dead plus live load. The allowable bearing capacity may be increased by 200 psf for each additional 6 inches of embedment below a depth of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade. The allowable bearing capacity shall not exceed 3,000 psf dead plus live loads.

Using these criteria, maximum total and differential settlement under static conditions are expected to be on the order of 3/4-inch and 1/4-inch in 25 feet, respectively. Footings shall also be designed to withstand total and differential dynamic settlement of 2 inches and 1 inch across the largest building dimension, respectively.

Measures shall be
shown on building
plans, to be verified
by the City Building
Division
Prior to issuance of
building permits for
habitable structures
on-site
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Building Division
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
13 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
c. Lateral loads may be resisted by soil friction and by passive resistance of the soil acting on foundations. Lateral capacity is based on the assumption that backfill adjacent to foundations is properly compacted. A passive equivalent fluid pressure of 375 pound-force per cubic foot (pcf) and a coefficient of friction of 0.39 may be used in design. No factors of safety, load factors, and/or other factors have been applied to any of the values.
d. The allowable bearing capacity may be increased by one-third when transient loads such as wind or seismicity are included if the structural engineer determines they are allowed per Sections 1605.3.1 and 1605.3.2 (CBC 2022).

The following seismic parameters are presented for use in structural design:
2019 Mapped CBC
Values Site Class “D” Adjusted Values Design Values
Seismic
Parameters
Values
(g)
Site
Coefficients
Values
(g)
Seismic
Parameters
Values
(g)
Seismic
Parameters
Values
(g)
SS 1.056 Fa 1.078* SMS 1.138 SDS 0.759*
S1 0.386 FV 1.914 SM1 0.739 SD1 0.493
Peak Mean Ground Acceleration (PGA M) = 0.527g
Seismic Design Criteria = D
*Fa should be taken as 1.4 and SDS as 0.996 if the Simplified Lateral Force Analysis Procedure in Section 12.14.8 of the American Society of Civil Engineers Publications is used in structural design
e. Foundation excavations shall be observed by the geotechnical engineer prior to placement of reinforcing steel or any formwork. Foundation excavations shall be thoroughly moistened prior to PCC placement and no desiccation cracks shall be present.

GEO/mm-3.1 Prior to issuance of building permits, the following measures shall be incorporated into the project utility construction plans, to be verified by the City Building Division:
a. Unless otherwise recommended, utility trenches adjacent to foundations shall not be excavated within the zone of foundation influence, as shown in the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared for the project (Earth Systems Pacific 2021).
b. Utilities that must pass beneath foundations shall be placed with properly compacted utility trench backfill and the foundation shall be designed to span the trench.
c. A select, noncorrosive, granular, easily compacted material shall be used as bedding and shading immediately around utilities. Generally, the soil found at the site may be used for trench backfill above the select material. d. Utility trench backfill shall be moisture conditioned and compacted. The Engineering Design Standards (SBC 2011) requires a minimum compaction of Measures shall be
shown on project
utility construction
plans, to be verified
by the City Building
Division
Prior to issuance of
building permits
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Building Division
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
14 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
95 percent of maximum dry density in trench backfill in existing or future public roadway areas. A minimum of 95 percent of maximum dry density shall also be obtained where trench backfill comprises the upper 1-foot of subgrade beneath HMA or PCC pavement, and in all AB. A minimum of 85 percent of maximum dry density will generally be sufficient where trench backfill is located in landscaped or other unimproved areas, where settlement of trench backfill would not be detrimental.
e. Jetting of trench backfill shall generally not be allowed as a means of backfill densification. However, to aid in encasing utility conduits, particularly corrugated conduits and multiple closely spaced conduits in a single trench, jetting or flooding may be used. Jetting or flooding shall only be attempted with extreme caution, and any jetting or flooding operation shall be subject to review by the geotechnical engineer.
f. The Corrosion Evaluation Report prepared by CERCO Analytical, Inc. and presented in the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared for the project (Earth Systems Pacific 2021) shall be used by the architect/engineer in specifying appropriate corrosion protection measures for the utility improvements.

GEO/mm-3.2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following measures shall be incorporated into the project grading and construction plans, to be verified by the City Building Division:
a. All retaining wall foundations shall be founded in soil compacted as recommended in Mitigation Measure GEO/mm-2.1. Conventional foundations for retaining walls shall have a minimum depth of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade not including the keyway.
b. If retaining walls will retain more than 6 feet of soil, seismic design shall be required by the geotechnical engineer.
c. Retaining wall design shall be based on the following parameters:

Active equivalent fluid pressure
(native soil, imported sand or gravel backfill) ................35 pcf At-rest equivalent fluid pressure
(native soil, imported sand or gravel backfill) ................55 pcf Passive equivalent fluid pressure (compacted fill)............... 375 pcf Maximum toe pressure (compacted fill) ........................... 2,000 psf Coefficient of sliding friction (compacted fill) ........................... 0.39 d. No surcharges are taken into consideration in the above values. The maximum toe pressure is an allowable value to which a factor of safety has been applied.

No factors of safety, load factors, and/or other factors have been applied to any of the remaining values.
e. The above pressures are applicable to a horizontal retained surface behind the wall. Walls having a retained surface that slopes upward from the wall shall be designed for an additional equivalent fluid pressure of 1 pcf for the active case and 1.5 pcf for the at-rest case, for every 2 degrees of slope inclination.

Measures shall be
shown on grading
and construction
plans, to be verified
by the City Building
Division
Prior to issuance of
grading permits
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Building Division
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
15 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
f. The active and at-rest values presented above are for drained conditions.

Consequently, retaining walls shall be drained with rigid perforated pipe encased in a free draining gravel blanket. The pipe shall be placed perforations downward and shall discharge in a nonerosive manner away from foundations and other improvements. The gravel blanket shall have a width of approximately 1 foot and shall extend upward to approximately 1 foot from the top of the wall. The upper foot shall be backfilled with on-site soil except in areas where a slab or pavement will abut the top of the wall. In such cases, the gravel backfill shall extend up to the material that supports the slab or pavement.

To reduce infiltration of the soil into the gravel, a permeable synthetic fabric conforming to the Standard Specifications (Caltrans, 2018) Section 96-1.02B – Class “C,” shall be placed between the two. Manufactured geocomposite wall drains conforming to the Standard Specifications (Caltrans, 2018) Section 96-

1.02C are acceptable alternatives to the use of gravel provided that they are installed in accordance with the requirements of the manufacturer. Where drainage can be properly controlled, weep holes on maximum 4-foot centers may be used in lieu of perforated pipe. A filter fabric as described above shall be placed between the weep holes and the drain gravel.
g. Retaining walls where moisture transmission through the wall would be undesirable shall be thoroughly waterproofed in accordance with the specifications of the architect/engineer.
h. The architect/engineer shall bear in mind that retaining walls by their nature are flexible structures, and that surface treatments on walls often crack. Where walls are to be plastered or otherwise have a finish applied, the flexibility shall be considered in determining the suitability of the surfacing material, spacing of horizontal and vertical control joints, etc. The flexibility shall also be considered where a retaining wall will abut or be connected to a rigid structure, and where the geometry of the wall is such that its flexibility will vary along its length.

GEO/mm-3.3 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following measures shall be incorporated into the project construction plans, to be verified by the City Building Division:
a. Conventional interior light duty PCC slabs-on-grade and exterior flatwork shall have a minimum thickness of 4 full inches; however, the thickness of heavy- duty slabs and flatwork shall be specified by the architect/engineer.

Conventional interior slabs-on-grade shall be doweled to footings and grade beams with dowels.
b. Reinforcement size, placement, and dowels shall be as directed by the architect/engineer. Interior slabs-on-grade and light duty exterior flatwork shall be reinforced, at a minimum, with No. 3 rebar at 18 inches on-center each way.

Heavy duty exterior flatwork shall have minimum rebar sizing and spacing that meets the criteria of American Concrete Institute (ACI) 318 (ACI, 2014). A modulus of subgrade reaction (K30) of 100 psi/inch may be used in the design of heavy duty slabs-on-grade founded on compacted native soil. The modulus of subgrade reaction (K30) may be increased to 150 psi/inch if the slab is Measures shall be
shown on project
construction plans
Prior to issuance of
grading permits
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Building Division
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
16 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
underlain with a minimum of 6 inches of compacted Class 2 AB (Caltrans, 2018), and to 200 psi/inch if the slab is underlain with a minimum of 12 inches of compacted Class 2 AB.
c. Due to the current use of impermeable floor coverings, water-soluble flooring adhesives, and the speed at which buildings are now constructed, moisture vapor transmission through slabs is a much more common problem than in past years. Where moisture vapor transmitted from the underlying soil would be undesirable, the slabs shall be protected from subsurface moisture vapor. A number of options for vapor protection are discussed below; however, the means of vapor protection, including the type and thickness of the vapor retarder, if specified, are left to the discretion of the architect/engineer. d. Where specified, vapor retarders shall conform to ASTM E1745-17. This standard specifies properties for three performance classes, Class “A”, “B” and “C”. The appropriate class shall be selected based on the potential for damage to the vapor retarder during placement of slab reinforcement and concrete. e. Several recent studies, including those of ACI Document 302.1R-15 (ACI, 2015), have concluded that excess water above the vapor retarder increases the potential for moisture damage to floor coverings and could increase the potential for mold growth or other microbial contamination. The studies also concluded that it is preferable to eliminate the typical sand layer beneath the slab and place the slab concrete in direct contact with a Class “A” vapor retarder, particularly during wet weather construction. However, placing the concrete directly on the vapor retarder requires special attention to using the proper vapor retarder (see discussion below), a very low water-cement ratio in the concrete mix, and special finishing and curing techniques. f. The next most effective option would be the use of vapor-inhibiting admixtures in the slab concrete mix and/or application of a sealer to the surface of the slab.

This would also require special concrete mixes and placement procedures, depending upon the requirements of the admixture or sealer manufacturer. g. Another option that may be a reasonable compromise between effectiveness and cost considerations is the use of a subslab vapor retarder protected by a sand layer, however this would increase the potential for moisture damage to floor coverings and for mold growth or other microbiological contamination. If a Class “A” vapor retarder (see discussion below) is specified, the retarder can be placed directly on the material at pad grade. The retarder shall be covered with a minimum 2 inches of clean sand. If a less durable vapor retarder is specified (Class “B” or “C”), a minimum of 4 inches of clean sand shall be provided on top of the material at pad grade, and the retarder shall be placed in the center of the clean sand layer. Clean sand is defined as well or poorly graded sand (ASTM D2487-17) of which less than 3 percent passes the No. 200 sieve. The site soils do not fulfill the criteria to be considered “clean” sand. h. Regardless of the underslab vapor retarder selected, proper installation of the retarder is critical for optimum performance. All seams must be properly lapped, and all seams and utility penetrations properly sealed in accordance Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
17 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
with the vapor retarder manufacturer’s requirements. Installation shall conform to ASTM E1643-18a.
i. If sand is used between the vapor retarder and the slab, it shall be moistened only as necessary to promote concrete curing; saturation of the sand shall be avoided, as the excess moisture would be on top of the vapor retarder, potentially resulting in vapor transmission through the slab for months or years. j. In conventional construction, it is common to use 4 to 6 inches of sand beneath exterior flatwork. Another measure that can be taken to reduce the risk of movement of flatwork is to provide thickened edges or grade beams around the perimeters of the flatwork. The thickened edges or grade beams could be up to 12 inches deep, with the deeper edges or grade beams providing better protection. At a minimum, the thickened edge or grade beam shall be reinforced by two No. 4 rebar, one near the top and one near the bottom of the thickened edge or grade beam.
k. Flatwork shall be constructed with frequent joints to allow articulation as flatwork moves in response to seasonal moisture and/or temperature variations causing minor expansion and contraction of the soil, or variable bearing conditions. The soil in the subgrade shall be moistened to at least optimum moisture content and no desiccation cracks shall be present prior to casting the flatwork.
l. Where maintaining the elevation of the flatwork is desired, the flatwork shall be doweled to the perimeter foundation as specified by the architect/engineer. In other areas, the flatwork may be doweled to the foundation or the flatwork may be allowed to “float free,” at the discretion of the architect/engineer. Flatwork that is intended to float free shall be separated from foundations by a felt joint or other means.
m. To reduce shrinkage cracks in PCC, the PCC aggregates shall be of appropriate size and proportion, the water/cement ratio should be low, the PCC shall be properly placed and finished, contraction joints should be installed, and the PCC shall be properly cured. PCC materials, placement, and curing specifications shall be at the direction of the architect/engineer. The Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction (ACI, 2015) is suggested as a resource for the architect/engineer in preparing such specifications.

GEO/mm-5.1 Prior to site preparation, the following measures shall be incorporated into project construction plans:
a. Per Section 1804.4 (CBC 2022) unpaved ground surfaces shall be finish graded to direct surface runoff away from foundations and other improvements at a minimum 5 percent grade for a minimum distance of 10 feet. The site shall be similarly sloped to drain away from foundations, and other improvements during construction. Where this is not practicable due to other improvements, etc., swales with improved surfaces, area drains, or other drainage facilities, shall be used to collect and discharge runoff.
b. The eaves of the buildings shall be fitted with roof gutters. Runoff from flatwork, roof gutters, downspouts, planter drains, area drains, etc., shall discharge in a Measures shall be
shown on project
construction plans
Prior to site
preparation
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Building Division
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
18 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
nonerosive manner away from foundations and other improvements in accordance with the requirements of the governing agencies. Erosion protection shall be placed at all discharge points unless the discharge is to a pavement surface.
c. To reduce the potential for planter drainage gaining access to subslab areas, any raised planter boxes adjacent to foundations shall be installed with drains and sealed sides and bottoms. Drains shall also be provided for areas adjacent to the structure and in landscape areas that would not otherwise freely drain. d. The on-site soils are highly erodible. If soils are disturbed during construction, stabilization of soils by vegetation or other means, during and following construction, is essential to reduce erosion damage. Care shall be taken to establish and maintain vegetation. The landscaping shall be planned and installed to maintain the surface drainage recommended above. Surface drainage shall also be maintained during construction.
e. Maintenance of drainage and other improvements is critical to the long-term stability of the site and the integrity of the structures. Site improvements shall be maintained on a regular basis.
f. Finished flatwork and pavement surfaces shall be sloped to freely drain toward appropriate drainage facilities. Water shall not be allowed to stand or pond on or adjacent to exterior pedestrian flatwork, vehicle pavement, or other improvements as it could infiltrate into the AB and/or subgrade, causing premature deterioration of pavement, flatwork, or other improvements. Any cracks that develop in the pavement shall be promptly sealed. g. All exterior drains and drain outlets shall be maintained to be free-flowing. Care shall be taken to establish and maintain vegetation. Vegetation and erosion matting (if utilized) shall be maintained or augmented as needed. Irrigation systems shall be maintained so that soils around structures are maintained at a relatively uniform year-round moisture content, and are neither over-watered nor allowed to dry and desiccate.
h. The owner or site maintenance personnel shall periodically observe the areas within and around the site for indications of rodent activity and soil instability.

The owner or site maintenance personnel shall also implement an aggressive program for controlling the rodent activity in the general area.

GEO/mm-6.1 Prior to site preparation, the following measures shall be implemented:
a. A Geotechnical Engineer shall be retained to provide consultation during the design phase, to aid in the implementation of the findings of the Geotechnical Engineering Report in future project design, to review final plans once they are available, to interpret this report during construction, and to provide construction monitoring in the form of testing and observation. b. At minimum, the Geotechnical Engineer shall be retained to provide:

1. Review of final grading, utility, and foundation plans;

2. Professional observation during grading, foundation excavations, and trench backfill;
The identified
measures shall be
implemented
Prior to site
preparation
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Building Division
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
19 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties

3. Oversight of compaction testing during grading; and,

4. Oversight of special inspection during grading.
c. Special inspection of grading shall be provided as per Section 1705.6 and California Building Code Table 1705.6. The special inspector shall be under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. Special inspection of the following items shall be provided by the special inspector:

1. Stripping and clearing of vegetation;

2. Overexcavation to the recommended depths;

3. Scarification, moisture conditioning, and compaction of the soil;

4. Fill quality, placement, and compaction;

5. Utility trench backfill;

6. Retaining wall drains and backfill;

7. Foundation excavations; and

8. Subgrade and AB compaction and proof rolling.
d. A program of quality control shall be developed prior to beginning grading. The contractor or project manager shall determine any additional inspection items required by the architect/engineer or the governing jurisdiction. e. Locations and frequency of compaction tests shall be as per the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer at the time of construction. The recommended test location and frequency may be subject to modification by the Geotechnical Engineer, based upon soil and moisture conditions encountered, size and type of equipment used by the contractor, the general trend of the results of compaction tests, or other factors.
f. The Geotechnical Engineer shall be notified at least 48 hours prior to beginning construction operations.

GEO/mm-9.1 Prior to site grading, a Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) to train the grading personnel/crew shall be developed by a qualified paleontologist, meeting the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). The WEAP shall be presented to the grading personnel/crew by the qualified paleontologist.

The qualified paleontologist shall monitor initial grading activities, until it is determined by the qualified paleontologist that monitoring is no longer required because or grading is complete. If a paleontological resource is discovered during construction of the project, excavations within 50 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted or delayed until the discovery is examined by a qualified paleontologist in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards and protection and/or data recovery measures appropriate to the find are identified by the paleontologist and implemented.

The developer shall include a standard inadvertent discovery clause in every construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement.

Prepare and
present a Worker’s
Environmental
Awareness
Program and
provide
paleontological
monitoring during
grading
Prior to and during
grading activities
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
20 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
HAZ/mm-2.1 Prior to issuance of construction permits for infrastructure improvements, soil sampling shall be conducted for the presence of hazardous materials, including aerially deposited lead (ADL) and hydrocarbons in areas where excavation is required within 30 feet of State Route 135. Soil sampling shall be conducted by a licensed geologist or other qualified professional as approved by the City. ADL sampling shall focus on unpaved areas and formerly unpaved areas within the right-of-way and shall be conducted in accordance with current Caltrans guidance documents. Analytes to be targeted should include gasoline-, diesel-, and oil-range hydrocarbons; volatile organic compounds; and fuel oxygenates. If contaminated soil is present, the appropriate abatement actions shall be implemented in accordance with applicable Caltrans Standard Special Provisions and other applicable standards.

Conduct soil
sampling and
incorporate
applicable
abatement actions
as necessary
Prior to issuance of
construction permits
for infrastructure
improvements
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
HAZ/mm-2.2 To ensure contaminated soils excavated during infrastructure improvements are handled, stockpiled, and disposed of in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations, a Soil Management Plan and Health and Safety Plan shall be developed and implemented for the infrastructure improvements that are located beyond the 43.75-acre site. Special handling, treatment, or disposal of ADL in soils during construction activities shall be consistent with the DTSC and Caltrans Soil Management Agreement for Aerially Deposited Lead-Contaminated soils (effective July 1, 2016).

Prepare a Soil
Management Plan
and Health and
Safety Plan
Prior to issuance of
grading or
construction permits
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
HAZ/mm-5.1 At the time of Planned Development Permit approval for new land uses onsite, all development permit applications shall demonstrate full compliance with the applicable safety standards and compatibility policies of the airport land use plan in effect at the time. Consistency with the airport land use plan shall be reviewed and verified by the City of Santa Maria Community Development Department prior to building permit issuance.

Demonstrate full
compliance with
the applicable
safety standards
and compatibility
policies of the
airport land use
plan

At the time of
Planned
Development Permit
approval for new
land uses onsite
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
Hydrology and Water Quality
HYD/mm-1.1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall prepare and submit a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) according to General Permit Order 2009- 0009 or any subsequent order for approval by the City of Santa Maria Public Works Department and the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The SWPPP shall include best management practices (BMPs) to reduce erosive and polluted runoff during all phases of project construction. BMPs shall be approved by the City and the Central Coast RWQCB along with the SWPPP. These measures shall be included on all construction plans. BMPs may include, but are not limited to, erosion and sediment controls and vehicle and equipment monitoring and maintenance, as identified below:
a. Erosion and sediment controls, including silt fences, straw wattles, berms, sediment basins, runoff diversions, or other erosion control measures approved Prepare and submit
a Stormwater
Pollution
Prevention Plan
(SWPPP)
Prior to the issuance
of building permits
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Public Works
Department; RWQCB
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
21 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
by the Central Coast RWQCB shall be installed properly to increase effectiveness and shall be maintained regularly.
b. Vehicle and equipment maintenance and monitoring would require that all equipment and vehicles shall be checked and maintained daily to prevent spills of fuel, oil, and other hazardous materials. A designated staging area shall be established for vehicle/equipment parking and storage of fuel, lubricants, and solvents. The staging area shall be located a minimum of 100-feet from roadside drainages or culverts. All fueling and maintenance activities shall take place in the designated staging area.

Compliance with the SWPPP during project construction shall be monitored by the City’s Public Works Department during all construction phases.

HYD/mm-1.2 As specified in the SWPPP(s) and the City’s stormwater regulations, prior to issuance of a building permit for ground disturbing activities, the developer shall prepare and submit site-specific erosion and sediment control plans for mass grading as well as for development of each development area within the site. The plans shall be designed to minimize erosion and water quality impacts, and shall be consistent with the requirements of the project’s SWPPP(s). The plans shall include the following:
a. Graded areas shall be revegetated with deep-rooted, native, non-invasive drought tolerant species to minimize slope failure and erosion potential.

Geotextile fabrics shall be used as necessary to hold slope soils until vegetation is established;
b. Temporary storage of construction equipment shall be limited to a minimum of 100 feet away from drainages on the project site;
c. Erosion control structures shall be installed in compliance with BIO/mm-1.4; d. Demonstrate peak flows and runoff for each phase of construction; and e. Erosion and sediment control plans shall be submitted for review and approval by City staff and all requirements shall be included on construction plans.

The developer shall ensure installation of erosion control structures prior to beginning of any construction or grading activities subject to review and approval by the City.

Prepare and submit
site-specific
erosion and
sediment control
plans
Prior to issuance of
a building permit for
ground disturbing
activities
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Public Works
Department
HYD/mm-2.1 The developer shall prepare a development maintenance manual for the stormwater quality system and low impact development BMPs. The maintenance manual shall include detailed procedures for maintenance and operations of all stormwater facilities to ensure long-term operation and maintenance of post-construction stormwater controls.

The maintenance manual shall require that stormwater BMP devices be inspected, cleaned, and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s or designer’s maintenance specifications. The manual shall require that devices be cleaned annually prior to the onset of the rainy season (i.e., October 15) and immediately after the end of the rainy season (i.e., May 15). The manual shall also require that all devices be checked after major storm events.

Prepare a
development
maintenance
manual for BMPs.

Prior to issuance of
a building permit for
ground disturbing
activities
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Public Works
Department
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
22 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
HYD/mm-2.2 The property manager(s) or acceptable maintenance organization shall submit to the City Public Works Department a detailed report prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer addressing the condition of all private stormwater facilities, BMPs, and any necessary maintenance activities on a semi-annual basis (October 15 and May 15 of each year).

The requirement for maintenance and report submittal shall be recorded against the property.

Submit a detailed
report addressing
the condition of all
private stormwater
facilities, BMPs,
and any necessary
maintenance
activities on a
semi-annual basis
For the lifetime of
the project
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Public Works
Department
HYD/mm-2.3 BMP devices shall be incorporated into the stormwater quality system depicted in the erosion and sediment control plan (HYD/mm-1.2). BMPs shall include, at a minimum, the BMPs and source control measures and maintenance requirements for permanent and operation source control BMPs for landscaping, waste disposal, outdoor equipment storage, and parking.

Incorporate BMP
devices into the
stormwater quality
system
Prior to occupancy Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Public Works
Department
Noise
NOI/mm-1.1 The following measures shall be implemented to reduce construction-generated noise levels:
a. Construction activity shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, and between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays in accordance with the City’s Noise Element. No noise-generating construction activities are allowed to occur on Sundays or state or federal holidays.

Construction equipment maintenance shall be limited to the same hours. Non- noise-generating construction activities without mechanical equipment are not subject to these restrictions.
b. Control noise at all construction sites through the provision of mufflers and the physical separation of machinery maintenance areas from adjacent residential and noise-sensitive land uses.
c. Construction activities shall comply with the City of Santa Maria noise-control ordinance requirements, including obtaining a permit if deemed necessary.

Implement
identified measures
During construction
activities on the
project site
Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
NOI/mm-1.2 The following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce long-term exposure to transportation and non-transportation noise:
a. A noise wall or attenuating barrier shall be constructed along the western and northern portions of the proposed residential development, which is generally located south of Union Valley Parkway and east of Orcutt Road. The noise wall or barrier shall be constructed to minimum height of 6 to 8 feet above ground level as determined by a final acoustical assessment. Recommended barrier locations based on the conceptual site plan available in August 2022 are depicted in Figure 4.10-6. Noise barriers may consist of walls or a combination of walls and earthen berms. Barrier walls should be constructed of masonry Implement
identified measures
Prior to occupancy Implementation:

Applicant
Verification:

City Community
Development
Department
Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
23 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
block, or material of similar density and usage, with no visible air gaps at the base of the barrier or between construction materials.
b. A noise wall shall be constructed along the northern boundary of the commercial land uses, which are generally located north of Union Valley Parkway and east of Orcutt Road of the project. The wall shall be constructed to a minimum height of 6 to 8 feet above ground level as determined by a final acoustical assessment and shall be constructed of masonry block, or material of similar density and usage, with no visible air gaps at the base of the barrier or between construction materials.
c. Loading docks shall be fitted with door seals and bumpers. The installation of dock seals would reduce loading dock noise levels by approximately 5 dBA, or more. When the loading dock is not in use, loading dock doors shall remain closed.
d. Given the conceptual nature of the site plan considered in the EIR, there is the potential for the exact location of land uses to shift slightly as design plans are finalized. The operations of the final site plan shall be required to adhere to the following limitations to ensure exposure of residential and park land uses to operational noise is reduced. The following uses shall be limited to daytime hours (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.), unless an acoustical assessment is completed to determine that these commercial-uses would not impact nearby noise- sensitive land uses (residential and park uses):

1. Commercial-use loading docks within 300 feet of residential uses

2. Drive-throughs within 90 feet of residential uses

3. Car wash operations located within 1,400 feet of nearby residential land uses
If nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) operations are necessary for the proposed land uses noted above, an acoustical assessment shall be prepared to evaluate potential noise impacts to nearby existing and proposed noise- sensitive land uses for operations proposed to occur during the nighttime hours (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.). All proposed operations during the nighttime hours (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) shall not result in exceedances to the City’s noise standards, as demonstrated by the acoustical assessment. Where the acoustical assessment determines that source noise levels would exceed the City’s applicable noise standards, site-design features/noise-reduction measures shall be incorporated sufficient to reduce operational noise levels to below applicable noise standards.
e. An acoustical assessment shall be prepared for exterior commercial-use air conditioning units 300 feet from a noise-sensitive land use. The acoustical assessment shall evaluate operational noise levels in comparison to the City’s daytime and nighttime noise standards. Where the acoustical assessment determines that operational noise levels would exceed the City’s applicable noise standards, site-design features and/or noise-reduction measures shall be incorporated sufficient to reduce operational noise levels to below the City’s applicable noise standards. Such measures may include locating equipment on Richards Ranch Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
24 Mitigation
Measure Requirements of Measure
Compliance
Method Verification Timing Responsible Parties
rooftop areas, incorporation of additional shielding, selection of low-noise generation equipment, and/or incorporation of rooftop parapets.

City of Santa Maria Maximum Acceptable Noise Levels by Land Use Zones
Range of Intensities (dBA Leq)
Ambient Base 15 Minutes 5 Minutes 1 Minute
Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night
Residential 55 45 60 50 65 55 70 60
Commercial 65 60 70 65 75 70 80 75
Industrial 75 70 80 75 85 80 90 85
Source: City of Santa Maria (2022)
dBA = A-weighted decibels; Leq = Equivalent sound level

LAFCOXXXX
Union Valley Annexation
To the City of Santa Maria
Legal Description
Portions of Sections, 2,3, 10 and 11, all in Township 9 North, Range 34 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of Santa Barbara, State of California as described per Grant Deed recorded as instrument number 2021-0053767 on file in the office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the Northwest corner of the tracts of land deeded to Richards Ranch LLC, as said instrument number 2021-0053767;
1st Thence, South 88 degree 26 minutes 39 seconds East, 1,292.09 feet; 2nd Thence, South 02 degrees 10 minutes 28 seconds West, 654. 76 feet, to a point in Union Valley Parkway;
3rd Thence, South 01 degrees 36 minutes 46 seconds West, 1253. 72 feet to corner common with the Northeast corner of Tract No 10,001, recorded in Book 51, Maps and Surveys, Pages 80 to 82 on file in the office of said County Recorder; 4th Thence, North 88 degrees 38 minutes 09 seconds West, along the Northerly line of said Tract No.10,001, 765.07 feet to the Southeasterly corner of Parcel A of Parcel Map No. 12,864, recorded in Book 23, Page 30 of Parcel Maps;
5th Thence, North 01 degrees 40 minutes 48 seconds East, along the Easterly line of said parcel Map No. 12,864, 416.17 feet;
6th Thence, North 88 degrees 37 minutes 32 seconds West along the Northerly line of said Parcel map No. 12,864 and its Wwesterly prolongation, 753.84 feet to the East line of Lot 169, Tract No. 12,735 - Unit 1, recorded in Book 97, Maps, Pages 29 through J1 on file in the office of said County Recorder;
7th Thence, North 01 degrees 31 minutes 13 seconds East along said East line, 37.37 feet; 8th Thence North 1 degree 35 minutes 19 seconds East along said East line 32.08 feet; 9th Thence North 1 degree 36 minutes 00 seconds East along said East line 343.92 feet; 10th Thence North 5 degrees 20 minutes 02 seconds East along said East line 150.38 feet; 1/2

ATTACHMENT I

L38
L37
_J
_J
L49

SECTION LINE
L29

UNION VALLEY PARKWAY
L25 L24

LINE TABLE
NO. BEARING
L21 S1°36'46"W
L22 N69°04'34"W
L23 N87"43'00"W
L24 S87"51 '28"W
L25 N87"44'08"W
L26 s4a·29•07"w
L27 S10'57'08"W
L28 s22·55•14"w
L29 S33"54'15"W
L3o s40·20·01"w
L31 S43°10'51 "W
L32 544·15• 43"W
L33 s49·33'18"W
L34 S31 ·oa· 44"W
L35 s20·4 7' 42"W
L36 S11 °49'55"W
L37 N1 °42'25"E

DISTANCE

60.54'
102.99'
396.27'

97.38'
249.17'

50.38'
116.69'

60.92'

98.03'

93.62'
109.53'

73.64'

68.92'

82.73'

79.30'
106.75'
245.93'
L23
SEE SHEET 2
SECTION 2
SECTION 11 L22
I
I
I
I
I
PT" "
L21
NO.

L38
L39
L40
l41
L42
L43
L44
L45
L46
L47
L48
L49
L50
..-
II
..-

LINE TABLE

BEARING DISTANCE
N32°30' 45"E 49.11'
N35°21 '40"E 70.38'
N12·25' 55"E 24.29'
N42°59'04"E 28.02'
N65°28'22"E 32.88'
N42°50'02E 89.17'
N37"20'08"E 43.20'
N28°21 '17"E 100.55'
N20°01'33"E 65.96'
N11 ·25• 46"E 109.18'
N43°24'20"W 41.04'
N80°48'38"W 134.35'
N84°26'17"W 122.73'
2624 AIRPARK DRIVE
SANTA MARIA, CA 93455
PHONE: 805-934-5727
FAX: 805-934-3448
DATE: DEC.4, 2023
SHEET 4 OF 4
21128LAFCO.DWG
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA,

CALIFORNIA, TO CERTIFY AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

MAKING CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS,

ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND

ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR

THE RICHARDS RANCH ANNEXATION, PRE-ZONING, AND GENERAL

PLAN LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST

AND SOUTHEAST INTERSECTIONS OF UNION VALLEY PARKWAY AND HIGHWAY 135

WHEREAS, the applicant, MD3 Investments, initiated a n Annexation (AN2021- 0001) and General Plan Land Use Map Amendment and Pre-Zoning (GPZ2024-0001) on approximately 44 acres of property located at the northeast and southeast corner of the intersection of Union Valley Parkway and Highway 135, herein referred to as the Project; and

WHEREAS, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) was prepared for the project on February 8, 2022, and sent to the State Clearinghouse and to all relevant agencies and made available for public comment as required by law; and

WHEREAS, a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH# 2022020194) was prepared for said Project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and the required notices were published and the EIR was circulated for public review for the duration between and including December 22, 2022 through March 7, 2023, sent to every responsible and/or trustee agency with jurisdiction over the project and placed in a public location; and

WHEREAS, following the release of the Draft EIR, new information was obtained regarding the monarch butterfly and overwintering habitat for the species. For these reasons, the City determined that the portions of the Draft EIR related to Biological Resources and Project Alternatives should be revised and recirculated for public comment. The partially recirculated EIR was released for a 45-day public comment period from January 31 to March 15, 2024; and

WHEREAS, at the completion of the public review period s on the EIR for the project, comments were received and responses to those comments were prepared and incorporated into the EIR; and

WHEREAS, the EIR was provided to the Planning Commission, along with all public comments and the responses to those public comments; and

2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Maria held a regularly scheduled public hearing on October 2, 2024, for the purpose of receiving evidence and considering the EIR, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and

WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and

WHEREAS, after considering all evidence, the Planning Commission, in Resolution No. 2832, recommended to the City Council the certification of the EIR, adoption of the Statement of Overriding C onsiderations, and adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project; and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held a regularly scheduled public hearing on November 19, 2024, for the purpose of considering certification of the EIR, adoption of the Statement of Overridi ng C onsiderations, and adoption of the Mitigation M onitoring and Reporting P rogram for the proposed project , incorporated herein by reference; and

WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and

WHEREAS, at the completion of the public hearing, the City Council duly considered all evidence presented at said hearing; and

WHEREAS, the EIR reflects the City Council’s independent judgment and analysis.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. The City Council makes the required CEQA findings for the project included as Attachment D of the Council Agenda Report dated November 19, 2024, incorporated herein by reference.

Section 3. The City Council certifies the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2022020194 ) included as Attachment C of the Council Agenda Report dated November 19, 2024, incorporated herein by reference and finds that it complies with CEQA.

Section 4. The City Council a dopts a Statement of Overriding Considerations included as Attachment E of the Council Agenda Report dated November 19, 2024 , incorporated herein by reference, that balances the benefits of the project against the 3 significant, unavoidable impacts to Biological Resources, which cannot be mitigated to acceptable levels through project redesign and conditions of approval.

Section 5. The City Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program included as Attachment F of the Council Agenda Report dated November 19, 2024, incorporated herein by reference.

Section 6. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make m inor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 19th day of November 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
City Manager

1 RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA

MARIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE POLICY MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY

43.75 ACRES LOCATED AT THE

NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF THE INTERSECTION
OF HIGHWAY 135 AND UNION VALLEY PARKWAY

WHEREAS, the applicant, MD3 Investments , initiated a n Annexation, General Plan Land Use amendment and pre-zoning (GPZ2024-0001) to amend the General Plan Land Use Map , pre-zone, and annex approximately 4 3.75 acres of property at the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of Highway 135 and Union Valley Parkway, herein referred to as the Project; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Maria held a regularly scheduled public hearing on October 2, 2024, for the purpose of considering amendments to the Land Use Policy Map of the City’s General Plan and pre -zoning for the property; and

WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and

WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the Planning Commission heard and considered all evidence, including evidence presented in the staff report and all written and oral testimony; and

WHEREAS, on October 2, 2024, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report , in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq., as amended; and

WHEREAS, on October 2, 2024, the Planning Commission made its recommendation in writing that the City Council amend the General Plan Land Use Policy Map; and

WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held on this amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map by the City Council on November 19, 2024; and

WHEREAS, the City Council made no substantial modification of the proposed amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map which had not been previously considered by the Planning Commission; and

WHEREAS, the City Council considered all written and oral testimony; and

WHEREAS, the City Council considered and relied on the Planning Commission’s recommendations to certify the Environmental Impact Report for the Project, in making its decision on the amendment to the Land Use Policy Map of the City’s General Plan.

2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, that:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council finds that:
a) The proposed project is consistent with applicable goals and policies of the adopted General Plan . The proposed project modifies the existing General Plan land use designation from Commercial Professional Office (CPO) to Community
Commercial (CC) and High Density Residential (HDR-22). The proposed land use designations will allow the site to be developed with a mix of retail commercial and residential uses (apartments and town homes). The additional residential development on the site will provide needed housing stock in Santa Maria and the surrounding Orcutt area and assist with the current housing shortage in California. The project promotes high quality commercial development that would serve to attract commercial and retain enterprises and
employment opportunities; and

b) The proposed project would not significantly disrupt any of the various land uses in the vicinity because the General Plan Land Use Amendment will facilitate the future development of the property with retail commercial and residential uses that will be designed to be compatible with the residential intens ity and land use patterns. Future development of the site will be subject to the mitigation measures in the Environmental Impact Report to reduce potential noise, traffic, lighting, and associated impacts to adjacent residential neighborhoods; and

c) The proposed project is afforded the appropriate services and facilities in that all infrastructure is currently available to serve the project site . The subject General Plan Land Use
Amendment will change the City’s existing General Plan land use designation fro m Commercial Professional Office (CPO) to Community Commercial (CC) and High Density Residential (HDR-22). Future development of the site will require
discretionary permits approved by the Planning Commission.

This development will be subject to the mitigation measures in the Environmental Impact Report to reduce potential noise, traffic, lighting, and associated impacts to adjacent residential neighborhoods. The project vicinity has been previously developed with infrastructure to serve the site. If defici encies in services and facilities are identified during the review of future proposed planned developments, infrastructure
improvements to accommodate the proposals shall be
required.
3 Section 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Maria approves an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map for

43.75 acres FROM CPO (Commercial Professional Office) TO CC (Community Commercial) on 16.35 -acres and HDR -22
(High Density Residential , 22 dwelling units per acre
maximum) on 27.4 -acres as shown on Attachment G of the Council Agenda Report dated November 19, 2024 ,
incorporated herein by reference.

Section 5. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 19th day of November 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
City Manager

ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
MARIA, CALIFORNIA, PRE-ZONING APPROXIMATELY 43.75 ACRES

LOCATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF SANTA BARBARA
COUNTY FROM RETAIL COMMERCIAL (C-2) TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT/GENERAL COMMERCIAL (PD/C-2) ON 16.35 ACRES,

AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(PD/R-3) ON 27.4 ACRES

WHEREAS, the applicant, MD3 Investments, initiated a General Plan Land Use amendment and Pre-zoning (GPZ2024-0001) to amend the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map , Pre -zone, and annex approximately 43.75 acres of property at the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of Highway 135 and Union Valley Parkway, herein referred to as the Project; and

WHEREAS, on October 2, 2024, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq., as amended; and

WHEREAS, on October 2, 2024 , the Planning Commission made its recommendation in writing that the City Council Pre-zone the project site; and

WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held on the proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment and Pre -zoning by the City Council on November 19, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City Council made no substantial modification of the proposed amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map and Pre-zoning which had not been previously considered by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered all written and oral testimony; and

WHEREAS, the City Council considered and relied on the Planning Commission’s recommendations to certify the Environmental Impact Report for the Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, State of California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council approves pre-zoning the 43.75-acre project site FROM Retail Commercial (C -2) TO Planned Development/General commercial (PD/C -2) on 16.4 acres of the project site, and Planned 2 Development/High Density Residential (PD/R -3) on 27.4 acres of the project site as depicted in Attachment H of the Council Agenda Report dated November 19, 2024, incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 3. The Director of Community Development, or designee, is hereby authorized and directed to make corresponding changes on the Land Use Policy Map of the General Plan in conformity with this Ordinance.

SECTION 4. The City Council finds that the proposed pre -zoning modifications are in accordance with the provisions of the General Plan of the City, required for the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare, and the area is afford ed the services and facilities appropriate for the zones proposed. Pre-zoning is a required component of the annexation process. California Government Code Section 65859 allows the City to adopt (i.e., pre-zone) a zoning designation for land outside its ci ty limits in anticipation of annexation and development. Under the code provisions, the zoning designation adopted by the City would not become effective unless the property were to be annexed to the City. The County currently has the entire 43.75-acre site zoned as C-2 (retail commercial). The request by the applicant includes the pre-zoning designations of General Commercial (C - 2) on 16.4 acres of the site, and High Density Residential (R -3) on the remaining 27.4 acres. The sites would also be located wit hin the Planned Development (PD) Overlay District, which is designed and intended to provide for the orderly development of land in conformance with the City’s General Plan.

SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage. Within 15 days following its passage, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with State Law; or when deemed necessary due to the length or complexity of the Ordinance, cause a summary of the Ordinance to be prepared and published at least five days prior to the City Council meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted. If a summa ry is published at least five days prior to the City Council meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted, then within 15 days after adoption of the Ordinance the City Clerk shall publish a summary of the Ordinance with the names of those City Council Members voting for and against the Ordinance and shall post a certified copy of the full text of such adopted Ordinance along with the names of those City Council Members voting for and against the Ordinance.
3 INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on this 19th day of November, 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
City Manager

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN APPLICATION

INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE RICHARDS RANCH
REORGANIZATION (AN2021-0001)

WHEREAS, on August 17, 2021, the property owner, MD3 Investments, filed an application with the City of Santa Maria for the purpose of annexing approximately

43.75 acres located within the unincorporated area of Santa Barbara County at the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of Union Valley Parkway and Highway 135 (property); and
WHEREAS, the application filed by the property owner included a General Plan Map Amendment and pre-zoning of the property; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is uninhabited and wholly located within the City of Santa Maria Sphere of Influence; and
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria was provided consent by 100 percent of the property ownership for the subject reorganization; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on October 2, 2024, for the purpo se of considering the Annexation, General Plan Land Use Map Amendment, and pre-zoning applications; and
WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and
WHEREAS, at the October 2, 2024 , public hearing, the Planning Commission heard and considered all evidence, including evidence presented in the staff report and all written and oral testimony; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a Resolution (No. 2832) recommending that the City Council adop t a Resolution certifying the Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2022020194) making CEQA findings and a statement of overriding considerations, and approving a mitigation monitoring and reporting program in accordance with the California Environmental Quali ty Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. Seq., as amended; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a Resolution (No. 2833) recommending that the City Council adopt a Resolution to approve a General Plan Land Use Map Amendment and Pre-zoning; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission a dopted a Resolution (No. 2834) recommending that the City Council initiate the Richards Ranch Reorganization; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on November 19, 2024 for the purpo se of considering the Annexation, General Plan Land Use Map Amendment, and pre-zoning applications; and
2 WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and
WHEREAS, at the November 19, 2024, public heari ng, the City Council heard and considered all evidence, including evidence presented in the Council Agenda Report and all written and oral testimony; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution certifying the Environmental Impact Report (SCH #20220 20194) making CEQA findings and a statement of overriding considerations, and approving a mitigation monitoring and reporting program in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. Seq., as amended; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution to approve a General Plan Land Use Map Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council introduced an Ordinance to pre-zone 43.75 acres.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, that:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The Santa Maria City Council approve s this resolution of application to annex approximately 43.75 acres to the City of Santa Maria contingent on the adoption of the Ordinance to Pre-zone approximately 43.75-acres.

Section 3. This proposal is made, and it is requested that proceedings be taken, pursuant to the Cortese/Knox/Hertzberg Local
Reorganization Act of 2000, commencing with section 560 00 of the California Government Code.

Section 4. The proposed reorganization consists of the following changes of organization:
 Annexation to the City of Santa Maria
 Detachment from the Santa Barbara County Fire
Protection District
Section 5. A legal description and survey map of the boundaries of the affected territory, set forth in Attachment 9 of the Council Agenda Report dated November 19, 2024, incorporated
herein by reference, are authorized to be submitted by staff to complete the LAFCO application.

Section 6. The proposal is consistent with the Sphere of Influence of the City of Santa Maria.

Section 7. The reasons for the proposal are to provide water resources and other municipal services to the property that will allow for future urban development of the property.
3 Section 8. It is desired that the area to be annexed b e subject to a proportionate share of the City’s existing indebtedness.

Section 9. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 19th day of November 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
City Manager

FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Acting City Manager Chuen Wu

BY: Interim Director of Finance Xenia Bradford

SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution approving a Commercial Building Inspection User Fee

Description:

The City Council will conduct a Public Hearing and consider approving the addition of a Commercial Building Inspection User Fee.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution approving the addition of a Commercial Building Inspection User Fee at 100 percent cost recovery.

BACKGROUND:
"User fee" activities are defined as services the City provides to individuals who receive some material benefit from these services. The user fee philosophy holds that the cost of providing these services sho uld be borne by the group receiving the benefit, not the community as a whole. User fee services are differentiated from general public benefit services, such as police and fire which are largely tax-supported. For the most part, City fees should be set at full cost recovery to avoid subsidizing the activities of specific groups/individuals.

On April 20, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-39 establishing (a) user fees identified in a user fee study and (b) a user fee cost recovery level policy. This included the finding that Citywide user-specific services are provided for the benefit of the public, and that said services should be paid by the user in an amount sufficient to adequately cover the cost to the City. The City contracted with Revenue and Cost Specialists (RCS) to update user fees annually. In the calendar year 2022, and every even year forward, RCS will conduct a review of the City’s user fees, updating the City’s Cost Allocation Plan (CAP), salary, position data, and adopted budget. During the Fiscal Year 2024-26 budget development process, RCS met with City staff to discuss the addition, removal, and/or adjustment of user fees. A comprehensive fee update was adopted by the City Council in 2 June of 2024. Staff recommends updating the Commercial Building Inspection User Fee to 100 percent cost recovery as shown in Attachment A.

DISCUSSION:

The 2024 Long -Range Master Plan; Community Risk Assessment and Standards of Cover Update identified three areas of improvement for commercial properties and target hazards, as follows:
 Section A-1: Identify all commercial properties and target hazards.  Section A-2: Develop a schedule to inspect all commercial occupancies.  Section A-3: Review and adopt fee schedule and implement proposed increases.

The Fire Department has developed a commercial occupancy inspection program and is currently identifying all commercial occupancies within the City of Santa Maria. An inspection schedule has been established. Currently the Fire Department is utilizing a flat fee that does not reflect the size of a building. The proposed inspection fees are based on the square footage of buildings and the estimated time for an inspector to complete the fire and life safety inspection. This methodology is consistent with surr ounding jurisdictions.

The proposed user fee establishes the appropriate mechanism to fulfill these requests from the public. The user fees requested reflect the true cost of providing these services including 100 percent of the cost of personnel, materials, and overhead and are included on Attachment A.

Alternative(s)
If the City Council chooses not to add the new fee at this time, the City will continue to subsidize Commercial Building Inspection services with other revenues. The City Council may:
(1) Elect not to approve the Commercial Building Inspection fee at 100 percent cost recovery. The General Fund will subsidize the user fee collected to cover the full cost of the service.
(2) Direct staff to evaluate alternate fees and return to City Council for consi deration.

However, the user fee study based its findings on a cost-based analysis and since any alternate fees will be based on the same information, they will not differ from that which is currently proposed.

Staff recommends adoption of the Commercial Building Inspection fee at 100 percent cost recovery, as shown on Attachment A, to become effective January 1, 2025.

Fiscal Considerations
The user fee as proposed is calculated to recover the costs of providing this service. Cost- based fees ensure the amount collected is the same as the City’s expense to provide the service, thus eliminating subsidies from other sources.

3 Impact to the Community
Charging appropriate fees lessens subsidies and increases overall resources to provide general services to the public.

ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Proposed Commercial Building Inspection Fee

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ADDITION OF A COMMERCIAL BUILDING INSPECTION FEE AT 100 PERCENT COST RECOVERY

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria’s last comprehensive Citywide User Fee Study was completed in 2021; and

WHEREAS, the City contracted with Revenue and Cost Specialist to complete an Annual User Fee Update and User Fee Schedule 2024 based on the 2020 Comprehensive Fee Study, using updated salary and position data and Fiscal Year 2023- 24 budget; and

WHEREAS, at the June 4, 2024, City Council Meeting a public hearing was held, and at the June 18, 2024 City Council Meeting the City Council adopted Resolution 2024- 84 setting forth the fees in the Annual User Fee Update and User Fee Schedule 2024; and

WHEREAS, the proposed Commercial Building Inspection Fee for the Fire Department’s commercial occupancy inspection program will be set at a level that ensures the amount collected is the same as the City’s expense to provide the service, thereby eliminating subsidies from other sources; and

WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 2-24.105 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, cost and revenue data regarding the proposed new Commercial Building Inspection fee was made publicly available in the City Clerk’s Office at least 10 days prior to the November 19, 2024, public hearing date; and

WHEREAS, after deliberation, the City recommends that the City Council adopt the Commercial Building Inspection fee as proposed (Attachment A of the Council Agenda Report and incorporated herein by reference); and

WHEREAS, the City will continue to update user fees annually using the Consumer Price Index, in accordance with Section 2-24.202 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. The City Council hereby adopts the Commercial Building Inspection fee as shown in Attachment A of the Council Agenda Report related to this matter, and incorporated herein by reference, and dire cts the City Manager, or designee, to coordinate with the Department of Finance to implement the fee effective January 1, 2025; and

2. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Ci ty Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 19th day of November 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
City Manager

S-128ACOMMERCIAL BUIILDING INSPECTION

INSPECTIONFIRE
Commercial Building Inspections (Occupancy type: B, F, M, S) $105 per inspection
$120 - Up to 2,000 sq. ft.
$150 - 2,001 - 5,000 sq. ft.
$180 - 5,001 - 10,000 sq. ft.
$210 - 10,001 - 25,000 sq. ft.
$240 - 25,001 - 50,000 sq. ft.
$300 - 50,001 - 100,000 sq. ft.
$360- 150,001 – 200,000 sq. ft.
$420 - Over 200,001 sq. ft.
100%
$105.00
$247.38
$(142.38)
8 CITY OF SANTA MARIA
FY 2023-24

REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.

PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE

REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:

UNIT COST:

UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

TOTAL UNITS:

TOTAL REVENUE:

TOTAL COST:

TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):

PCT. COST RECOVERY: 42.45%
$(1,139)
$1,979
$840
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:

October 6, 2024

ATTACHMENT A
FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 2024

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: City Council

FROM: Acting City Manager Chuen Wu

BY: Interim Director of Finance Xenia Bradford

SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Approving First Quarter Amendments and Financial Report for the First Quarter Ending September 30, 2024

Description:

The City Council will consider receiving the 2024 -25 First Quarter Financial Report and approving proposed budget amendments.

RECOMMENDATION:
1) Receive and file the Financial Repo rt for the First Quarter ending September 30, 2024.
2) Adopt a Resolution a pproving First Quarter Amendments to the 2024 -25 Budget for personnel and operational changes.

BACKGROUND:

Four times each year, City staff completes a comprehensive analysis of City finances, including projected fund balances, revenues to date, departmental expenditures, encumbrances, and potential adjustments. This financial report summarizes the first quarter financial analysis.

DISCUSSION:

The Quarterly Financial Report for the First Quarter Ending September 30, 2024 (Attachment A) provides an overview of the current economic outlook at the State and National levels; General Fund revenues, expenditures, projected fund balances; Measure U activity ; and activity in the thre e Enterprise Funds. Though this information is not audited and does not contain all the usual year-end adjustments, accruals, or disclosures, the information does pr ovide a general picture of the City’s activity and the developing financial trends.

While the 2024-25 Adopted budget sets forth the budget and approved programs for the fiscal year, from time to time the need to adjust the budget may occur. Through quarterly reports, City departments submit budget requests to Finance and the City Manager for review. The budget amendments shown in Attachment B are recommended by the Acting City Manager for approval. Reasons for the requested budget amendments are provided for each item within the attachment.
2 Fiscal Impact
The proposed budget amendments will result in the following increases and decreases in the financial position by fund.

 Business Equipment Fund: increase appropriations from fund balance in the amount of $1,618,852
 Landscape District Funds: increase appropria tions from fund balance in the amount of $640,000.
 Growth Mitigation Fund: increase project appropriations from fund balance in the amount of $523,688.
 Capital Improvement Fund: decrease project appropriations positively impacting fund balance by $473,688.
 Water Fund: decrease appropriations by $108,710.
 Wastewater Fund: increase appropriations by $108,710.  Solid Waste Disposal Fund: increase appropriations by $234,550.

Impact to the Community
The interim financial statement provides the community with an understanding of the financial activity of the City’s primary funds.

ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Quarterly Financial Report Fourth Quarter Ending September 30, 2024 Attachment B: Proposed Budget Amendments

QUARTERLY

FINANCIAL
REPORT

FIRST QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2024

ATTACHMENT A

1 MAYOR
Alice Patino

MAYOR PRO TEM
Gloria Soto

COUNCIL
Carlos Escobedo
Maribel Aguilera-Hernandez
Mike Cordero

ACTING CITY MANAGER
Chuen Wu

REPORT PREPARED BY
Xenia Bradford
Interim Director of Finance
206 East Cook Street
Santa Maria, CA 93454
(805)925-0951 Ext. 2215
www.cityofsantamaria.org

Q U A R T E R L Y

F I N A N C I A L

R E P O R T

CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CA
V

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ECONOMIC INDICATORS ................................ ........................... 1 GENERAL FUND ................................ ................................ ..... 2 MEASURE U FUND ................................ ................................ . 6 ENTERPRISE FUNDS ................................ ................................ 7

WATER/WASTEWATER FUND

SOLID WASTE FUNDS

PUBLIC TRANSIT FUNDS
FY 2024-26 BIENNIAL BUDGET................................ ................. 8 FUND BALANCE ................................ ................................ ..... 8

GENERAL FUND

MEASURE U FUND
Quarterly Financial Report: First Quarter Ending September 30, 2024

1 ECONOMIC INDICATORS
The U.S. economy grew at a vigorous 3 percent annual pace from April through June, boosted by consumer spending and business investment. A forecasting tool from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta points to slower but still healthy 2.5 percent annual growth in the just-ended July-September quarter.

Economists had long expected that the Federal Reserve’s aggressive campaign to subdue inflation - it jacked up interest rates 11 times in 2022 and 2023 - would cause a recession. It did not. The economy kept growing even in the face of ever- higher borrowing costs for consumers and businesses. Across the economy, though, most indicators look solid, y et consumers are concerned about inflation and rising insurance premiums.

Inflation rose 2.4 percent in September from a year earlier, down from a peak inflation rate of 9.1 percent in June 2022 and now barely above the Federal Reserve’s 2 percent target. With prices coming under control, the Fed cut its benchmark interest rate recently for the first time in four years by a larger -than-usual half point. By year’s end, economists expect two additional Fed rate cuts, of smaller quarter-point increments, which should help ease borrowing costs over time.

Employers added a surprisingly strong 254,000 jobs in September, easing concerns about a weakening labor market and suggesting that the pace of hiring is still solid enough to support a growing economy. That ga in was far more than economists had expected, and it was up sharply from the 159,000 jobs that were added in August. The 10-year median is about 243,000 jobs added each month.

Sales of previously owned homes slowed to their lowest rate in nearly 14 years. Existing home sales retreated 1.0 percent from August to September, reaching an annual rate of 3.84 million, seasonally adjusted, said the National Association of Realtors. In California, sales of existing, single -family home sales totaled 253,010 in Sept ember on a seasonally adjusted annualized rate, down 3.4 percent from 262,050 in August and up 5.1 percent from 240,840 in September 2023. The statewide median home price was $868,150, down 2.3 percent from August and up 2.9 percent from $843,500 in September 2023.

After rising for most of 2024, the unemployment rate dropped for a second straight month, from 4.2 percent in August to

4.1 percent in September. The latest figures suggest that many companies are still confident enough to fill jobs despite the continued pressure of high interest rates.

California’s unemployment rate of 5.3 percent in September was unchanged from August. California’s job market expansion officially entered its 53rd month, according to the State Employment Development Department. S even of California's 11 industry sectors gained jobs in September with the largest increase in Private Education & Health Services (+9,600) led by gains in Health Care and Social Assistance.

Santa Barbara County’s unemployment rate was 4.1 percent in September compared to 3.8 percent a year ago, and Santa Maria was at 5.1 percent compared to 4.3 percent one year ago.

Insurance premiums continue to rise for auto coverage and for health insurance in California. The average annual cost of full car insurance in California was $2,417 as of June, up from $1,666 the year before, according to Insurify.

The cost of employer health insurance rose 7 percent for a second straight year, maintaining a growth rate not seen in more than a decade, according to an annual sur vey by the healthcare nonprofit KFF. The back -to-back years of rapid increases have added more than $3,000 to the average family premium, which reached roughly $25,500 this year.

Employers largely absorbed the added expenses

ECONOMIC INDICATORS (CONTINUED)
and spent about $1,880 more in 2024 than they had in 2023, bringing their average cost for family premiums to $19,276, the study found.

KEY STATISTICS
Quarterly Financial Report: First Quarter Ending September 30, 2024

2 GENERAL FUND
Budget:

The table below presents the budget as adopted and amended along with actual expenditures as of September 30, 2024.

General Fund appropriations adopted on June 18, 2024, were $108.72 million compared to budgeted sources of $100.15 million, inclusive of a $8.34 million draw from the Local Economic Augmentation Fund (LEAF) as a revenue source, and the use of $8.57 million of available General Fund balance.

GENERAL FUND

(in thousands)
Adopted
Budget
Current
Budget
2024-25
Actual
Percent of
Current Budget
Revenues & Transfers In
Sales Tax $ 31,872 $ 31,872 $ 8,051 25.3%
Property Tax 26,498 26,498 - 0.0%
Hotel/Bed Tax 4,274 4,274 762 17.8%
Licenses, Permits & Fees 3,196 3,196 1,354 42.4%
All Other Revenues 34,309 34,321 5,858 17.1%
Total Revenues & Transfers In $ 100,149 $ 100,161 $ 16,025 16.0%

Expenses & Transfers Out
Staffing $ 73,048 $ 73,048 $ 13,788 18.9%
Contracts & Services 10,184 10,184 1,807 17.7%
Materials & Supplies 4,257 4,257 1,173 27.6%
Maintenance & Operations 10,835 10,835 2,522 23.3%
Capital Outlay 1,800 1,800 9 0.5%
Debt Service 267 267 - 0.0%
Transfers 8,328 8,328 - 0.0%
Total Expenses & Transfers Out $ 108,719 $ 108,719 $ 19,299 17.8%

GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED)
Year-Over-Year Comparison:

The chart below compares revenue receipts, expenditures, and transfers for the first quarter ending September 30, 2024, versus the first quarter ending September 30, 2023.

Quarterly Financial Report: First Quarter Ending September 30, 2024

3 Major Revenues:

Through the first quarter, receipts for four major General Fund revenue sources (Sales Tax, Property Tax, Hotel Tax, and Licenses, Permits, & Fees) are at 15.4 percent of projections and account for approximately 63 percent of total General Fund revenues. Revenues are slightly less than the first quarter receipts from the prior year primarily due to sales tax; however, hotel tax and licenses, permits & fees are higher.

Revenue Variances:

The following highlights what is driving the variances in these individual revenue sources received through the first quarter:

GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED)
 Property Tax: The bulk of these payments are received through Santa Barbara County in December, January, April, and May of each year.
 Sales Tax: The chart below, as of the fourth quarter of FY 2023-24, reflects total sales taxes coming in near the same level as those through the fourth quarter of FY 2022-23 for all major business groups ; however, due to

Quarterly Financial Report: First Quarter Ending September 30, 2024

4 concerns about the economy still looming, consumers reduced spending in the Autos and Transportation category.

Receipts for the first quar ter of FY 2024 -25 are 1.5 percent, or $ 118 thousand, more than those for the same quarter last year.

 Hotel/Bed Tax: Through September, Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) receipts are 4.1 percent, or $ 30 thousand, more than last fiscal year but behind estimates by 7.2 percent, or $306 thousand.  Licenses, Permits, & Fees: Revenue of $1.35 million through the first quarter exceeds projections by 17.4 percent, or $555 thousand, and is 28.2 percent, or $298 thousand, more than that through the first quarter of FY 2023-24.

This quarter’s revenue includes the issuance of 663 building permits including 16 new single-family dwellings and 111 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). This is an increase compared to the same quarter of FY 2023-24, which included the issuance of 551 building permits. Permit activity continues to exceed projections due to ADU permit applications and overall development activity in Santa Maria.

Expenditures:

Through the first quarter, operating expenditures, excluding debt service and transfers, are at 19.3 percent of total budget.

Expenditures, as shown above in the Expenditure Categories chart above on t he right, are trending within budget with the exception of Materials & Supplies.

GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED)
Expenditure Variances:

Financial Reporting policies require explanation of variances greater than 5 percent of major categories and departmental variances greater than 10 percent.

Quarterly Financial Report: First Quarter Ending September 30, 2024

5  Staffing: Under budget by 6.1 percent through the first quarter, due to vacancies mostly experienced in the Police Department and overtime savings for the Fire Department, mostly due to the over hire of Firefighter positions in anticipation of staffing new Engine 6 . Recruitments of lateral and entry positions continue to be the Police Department’s focus to fill 26 vacancies.
 Contracts & Services: Under budget by 7.3% through the first quarter due to timing of the payment for contractual services with Santa Barbara County for Animal Control Services.  Transfers Out : Transfers from the General Fund to other funds as approved in the adopted budget will be evaluated in the second quarter.

The chart below presents the percentages of expenditures by department. No departmental variances are greater than 10 percent as of the first quarter.

Quarterly Financial Report: First Quarter Ending September 30, 2024

6 MEASURE U FUND
The table below presents the budget as adopted and amended along with actual expenditures as of September 30, 2024.

Measure U Fund appropriations adopted on June 20, 202 4, were $31.1 million compared to budgeted sources of $26. 7 million and the use of $4.41 million of available Measure U Fund balance.

MEASURE U FUND

(in thousands)
Adopted
Budget
Current
Budget
2024-25
Actual
Percent of
Current Budget
Revenue $ 26,716 $ 26,716 $ 6,876 25.7%

Expenses
Community Development $ 824 $ 824 203 24.6%
City Manager’s Office 1,435 1,435 275 19.1%
Finance 3 3 - 1.5%
Library 1,015 1,015 231 22.8%
Recreation & Parks 3,071 3,071 619 20.2%
Fire 11,946 11,946 2,819 23.6%
Police 12,836 12,836 3,172 24.7%
Total Expenses $ 31,130 $ 31,130 $ 7,319 23.5%

Revenues received through the first quarter are at 25.7 percent of budget, or $ 6.88 million. Expenditures are at 23.5 percent of budget, or $463 thousand under budget, primarily due to capital project activity and a delay in the operation of Regional Dispatch noted below.

The City Manager’s Office budget includes costs of maintaining the City’s mass notification system database , a position for the Public, Education, and Government (PEG), and the Motorola Backhaul Refresh and Refresh of CAD/RMS capital projects. The Finance budget is for the annual independent audit of Measure U financial activity. The Fire Department budget includes the City’s proportional cost of participating in the Regional Dispatch, which is anticipated to begin in early 2025.

Through September, Measure U expended 86.8 percent on Public Safety, 5.4 percent on Youth Services, and 7.8 percent on Quality of Life.

Quarterly Financial Report: First Quarter Ending September 30, 2024

7 ENTERPRISE FUNDS
The Statement of Revenues and Expenses through the first quarter ending September 30, 2024, for the three enterprise funds, are shown in the table below.

ENTERPRISE FUNDS

(in thousands)
Water /
Wastewater
Solid
Waste
Public
Transit
Revenues
Charges for Service $ 16,380 $ 8,604 $ 124
Interest Income 989 485 120
Other Revenue 551 27 1,035
Total Revenues $ 17,920 $ 9,116 $ 1,279

Expenses
Operating $ 3,938 $ 6,773 $ 1,008
Capital 599 1,486 152
State Water Payment 6,177 - -
Debt Service 696 - -
Total Expenses $ 11,410 $ 8,259 $ 1,160
Revenues/Expenses $ 6,510 $ 857 $ 119

Water/Wastewater Funds:

Revenues exceeded expenditures by $ 6.5 million, which is $ 1.0 million more than last year.

Revenues increased 5.8 percent, or $983 thousand, compared to the prior year due to higher revenues generated through sales of metered water. Expenses are $60 thousand less than last.

Through the first quarter, Water and Wastewater operational expenses are under budget by

18.7 percent due to personnel savings from vacant positions and timing of maintenance and contractual agreements.

Solid Waste Funds:

The Solid Waste Fund reports refuse collection and disposal activities. Through the first quarter, Solid Waste revenues exceeded expenditures by $ 857 thousand. Operational costs are under budget by 12.1 percent, or $6.4 million.

Public Transit Funds:

The City operates the Santa Maria Regional Transit (SMRT) and Breeze Transit systems, which are funded by a combination of Federal grants, State transportation funds, and user fares. Fare revenue through the first quarter is approximately $124 thousand, which is about $ 18 thousand less than last year. This difference is attributed to a decrease in ridership. The farebox ratio through September 30, 2024, is 12.3 percent based on fares received and operating expenses recorded to date.

FY 2024-26 BIENNIAL BUDGET

Quarterly Financial Report: First Quarter Ending September 30, 2024

8 The final budget was presented with a public hearing at the City Council meeting held on June 18, 2024. Public engagement occurred during the City Council’s meetings in May and June along with budget presentations and discussion s with department directors. Get the latest information on the public meetings related to the development of the FY 2024 -26 biennial budget by visiting the City’s we bsite at: https://www.cityofsantamaria.org/services/departments/city-clerk- records/agendas-reports-meeting-videos.

GENERAL FUND & MEASURE U FUND BALANCE SUMMARY
General Fund:

The General Fund Fiscal Year 2023-24 year-end audited results will be presented in February with the Quarter 2 Financial Report. The audited financial statements will reflect final results for actual receipts for revenues and will encompass all expenditures including carryovers per Council adopted policies and accounting principles. The table below shows revenues are at 16.0 percent of projections while expenditures are at 17.8 percent of appropriations for the fi rst quarter of the Fiscal Year 2024-25.

GENERAL FUND
(in thousands) Adopted
Budget
1st Quarter Percent
Beg. Fund Bal. $ 8,570
Revenues* 100,149 16,025 16.0%
Expenditures* 108,719 19,299 17.8%
Rev/Exp $ (8,570) $ (3,274)
Measure U Fund:

The table below shows revenues are at 25.7 percent of projections while expenditures are at 23.5 percent of appropriations. Carryover requests are being evaluated at an estimated amount of $6.2 41 million. Majority of the carryover funds will be due to funding allocated toward Capital Improvement Program within the Measure U fund in prior years.

MEASURE U FUND
(in thousands) Adopted
Budget
1st Quarter Percent
Beg. Fund Bal. $ 4,414
Revenues* 26,716 6,876 25.7%
Expenditures* 31,130 7,319 23.5%
Rev/Exp $ (4,414) $ (443)

It is important to note these are only estimates because the City’s annual audit for FY 2023-24 is not finalized.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

MAYOR & COUNCIL

Gloria Soto
Councilmember
District 3

Maribel Aguilera-
Hernandez
Councilmember
District 4

Alice Patino
Mayor
At-Large

Carlos Escobedo
Councilmember
District 1

Mike Cordero
Councilmember
District 2

City of Santa Maria, California
110 E. Cook Street
Santa Maria, CA 93454
cityofsantamaria.org

EXPLORE
the City’s budget online at
www.cityofsantamaria.org/services/departments/city-manager-s-office/city-budget

CITY OF SANTA MARIA DISTRICTS
DISTRICT 2
Mike Cordero
DISTRICT 1
Carlos Escobedo
DISTRICT 3
Gloria Soto
DISTRICT 4
Maribel Aguilera-Hernandez

ATTACHMENT B
PROPOSED BUDGET AMENDMENTS:

CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE/BUSINESS EQUIPMENT FUND

Increase appropriations by $1,210,852 to correct allocations to meet the needs of the fund activities for the current fiscal year. The funds have been previously set aside in this fund for specific purposes.

Increase business equipment annual allocations by $1,210,852 to meet the needs for equipment replacement for the current fiscal year. Funds are set aside in the business equipment fund for future equipment replacement over the life of the asset. Higher appropriations need in the current fiscal year has been identified in the areas of equipment, copy machines, sc anners, printers, networks equipment, and computers. This is a correction based on further analysis and does not represent changes in operations.

Increase appropriations by $48,000 due to an increase in Dell-VMWare software costs.

The City Manager’s Office’s Information Technology Division manages the Business Equipment Fund and requests additional appropriation in the amount of $48,000 due to an unforeseen increase in Dell-VMWare software costs.

Increase appropriations by $ 360,000 for the Police Department’s contracts with AXON and Flock.

The City Manager’s Office’s Information Technology Division manages the Business Equipment Fund and requests additional appropriation in the amount of $ 360,000 for the Police Department’s contracts with AXON and Flock . This allocation will maintain existing services planned for in the business equipment fund. The action corrects annual allocations to meet the ongoing need. Funds have been previously set aside for this purpose in the fund.

CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE/GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND

Increase appropriations by $50,000 for the Motorola Backhaul Refresh Project.

The City Manager’s Office’s Information Technology Division requests an additional appropriation in the amount of $50,000 for the Motorola Backhaul Refresh project due to higher- than-anticipated equipment costs. Funds are available in the Capital Projects fund balance.

RECREATION & PARKS/ LANDSCAPE DISTRICT FUNDS

Increase allocations for two (2) full-time Crew Leader and four (4) full-time Maintenance Worker I positions in the amount of $640,000.

Property owners located within one of the four master Landscape Districts pay a special assessment for lighting and landscaping in their neighborhoods to be adequately maintained and renovated as needed. Due to a shortage of staff assigned to work in the Speci al Districts, the Recreation & Parks Department has not bee n able to keep up with the maintenance needs of these areas. In addition to the shortage of staff to provide landscape maintenance in the neighborhoods, between 2021 and 2025 four new parks within the Special District regions, along with the new Battles Ro ad multi -use path, have gone or will be online. Furthermore, new

developments that fall within these zones would be subject to the same assessment and the requirement for the Recreation & Parks Department to perform necessary maintenance services on any new landscaping. No additional staff have been added to perform ongoing maintenance on these parks. The Recreation & Parks Department requests an increase of allocations for six (6) full-time positions, comprised of two (2) Crew Leader and four (4) Maintenan ce Worker I positions, to serve the special landscaping needs of the community at an appropriate level, ensuring that the City is adequately utilizing associated funds.

PUBLIC WORKS/GROWTH MITIGATION FUND

Reallocate $523,688 for the Betteravia Road/US 101 Interchange Project to be funded by the Growth Mitigation Fund instead of Gax Tax and General Fund Capital Improvement Fund.

The budget adopted for fiscal years 2022-24 for the Betteravia Road/US 101 Interchange Project in the General Fund C apital Projects Fund totaled $750,000 and in the Gas Tax and Transportation Development Act Fund totaled $65,000. It has since been determined that the balance of the portion of this project funded by the General Fund Capital Projects Fund, which is $523,6 88, should be funded by the Growth Mitigation Fund. Therefore, the Public Works Department will not request carryover of the balance remaining for this project in the General Fund Capital Projects Fund. Through this budget amendment, the Public Works Depar tment requests an appropriation in the amount of $523,688 in the Growth Mitigation Fund instead to continue the progress on the Betteravia Road/US 101 Interchange Project.

PUBLIC UTILITIES/WATER FUND & WASTEWATER FUND

Reallocate appropriations from Water Fund by $ 108,710 to the Wastewater Fund for the replacement of a 2015 International Terrastar 4x2 Regular Cab Utility Body truck and authorize a corresponding reduction in the Water Fund.

The replacement of a 2015 International Terrastar 4x2 Regular Cab Utility Body truck is currently budgeted in FY 2024-25 in the Water Fund. It has since been determined that the replacement of this truck should be accounted for in the Wastewater Fund. Therefore, the Utilities Department requests an appro priation in the amount of $108,710 in the Wastewater Fund and a corresponding reduction in the Water Fund to correctly account for the replacement of this vehicle.

PUBLIC UTILITIES/SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FUND

Increase appropriations by $234,550 for postclosure maintenance of the Santa Maria Regional Landfill.

The City of Santa Maria entered into a Pledge of Revenue Agreement with CalRecycle for the postclosure maintenance of the Santa Maria Regional Landfill. The pledged revenue in the operating account wi ll be $665,000 per fiscal year, reflecting the latest cost estimate for monitoring and postclosure maintenance. T he current appropriation is $390,450. The Utilities Department requests an additional appropriation in the amount of $234,550. There is sufficient ongoing funding in the fund.

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FIRST-QUARTER AMENDMENTS TO THE 2024-25 BUDGET FOR

PERSONNEL AND OPERATIONAL CHANGES

WHEREAS, certain personnel and operational issues are brought forward for the City Council’s consideration in conjunction with the quarterly financial report; and

WHEREAS, it is recommended to amend the 2024-25 budget for subsequent appropriations, actions, and costs as determined to be in the public’s best interest.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

1. Increase appropriations by $1,210,8 52 in the Business Equipment Fund to correct allocations to meet the needs fo r the Business Equipment Fund’s activities for the current fiscal year; and

2. Increase appropriations by $48,000 in the Business Equipment Fund to fund the increase in Dell-VMWare software costs; and

3. Increase appropriations by $360,000 in the Business Equipment Fund to fund the Police Department’s contracts with AXON and Flock; and

4. Increase appropriations by $50,000 in the General Fund Capital Projects Fund for the Motorola Backhaul Refresh Project; and

5. Increase allocations by $640,000 for two (2) full -time Crew Leader and four (4) full - time Maintenance Worker I positions in the Landscape Districts Funds; and

6. Increase appropriations in the Growth Mitigation Fund by $523,688 and decrease appropriations in the Capital Improvement Fund for the Betteravia/US 101 project; and

7. Reallocate appropriations from the Water Fund to the Wastewater Fund in the amount of $108,710 for the replacement of a 2015 International Terrastar 4x2 Regular Cab Utility Body truck and authorize a corresponding reduction in the Water Fund; and

8. Increase appropriations by $234,550 in the Solid Waste Disposal Fund for postclosure maintenance of the Santa Maria Regional Landfill.

///

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 19th day of November 2024.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
City Manager

Santa Maria City CouncilNovember 19, 2024

Santa Maria City Council
November 19, 2024