Cities Index.
Annotated agenda

Santa Monica City Council
March 15, 2022

Document
Annotated agenda
Meeting
March 15, 2022
Body
Santa Monica City Council
Original file
289 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santamonicacityca.iqm2.com. That file is the official record.

1 March 15, 2022

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MARCH 15, 2022
A special meeting of the Santa Monica City Council was called to order by Mayor Himmelrich at 5:33p.m., on Tuesday, March 15, 2022, via teleconference pursuant to Assembly Bill No. 361 signed by, Governor Gavin Newsome at City Council Chambers, 1685 Main Street.

Roll Call: Present: Mayor Sue Himmelrich
Mayor Pro Tem Kristin McCowan
Councilmember Phil Brock
Councilmember Gleam Davis
Councilmember Lana Negrete
Councilmember Oscar de la Torre
Councilmember Christine Parra
Also Present: City Manager David White
Interim City Attorney Joseph Lawrence
Assistant City Clerk Nikima Newsome
CONVENE/PLEDGE On order of the Mayor, the City Council convened at 5:33 p.m., with all members present. Councilmember de la Torre led the assemblage in the Pledge of Allegiance.

CLOSED SESSIONS There was no one present for public comment on closed sessions.

On order of the Mayor, the City Council recessed at 5:35 p.m., to consider closed sessions and returned at 7:34 p.m., with all members present, to report the following:

1.A Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation – Litigation has been Initiated Formally Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 54956.9 (d) (1): Jennifer Howard; Amanda Pawlowski v. Edwin Valdez; City of Santa Monica, Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 21STCV42208
The Interim City Attorney advised this matter was heard with no reportable action taken.

1.B Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation – Litigation has been initiated formally pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1): Wolfgang Mountford v. City of Santa Monica, DocuSign Envelope ID: 9868DC5D-E865-4855-A039-88C55BF50BCC 2 March 15, 2022
U.S. District Court Case No. 2:20- CV-07220-MCS (Ex)
The Interim City Attorney advised this matter was heard with no reportable action taken.

1.C Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation – Litigation has been initiated formally pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1): Oscar de la Torre v. City of Santa Monica, Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 21STCV08597
The Interim City Attorney advised this matter was heard with no reportable action taken.

1.D Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation – Litigation has been initiated formally pursuant to Gov. Code Section 54956.9(d)(1): City of Santa Monica v. The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, et al., LASC Case No. 21STCV36027 The Interim City Attorney advised this matter was heard with no reportable action taken.

1.E Public Employee Appointment: Title – City Attorney
The Interim City Attorney advised this matter was heard with no reportable action taken.

REPORT ON COUNCIL
TRAVEL
There was nothing to report on Council travel.

AGENDA MANAGEMENT Motion by Mayor Pro Tem McCowan, seconded by Councilmember Davis, to hear Items 11.A. and 13.A. before Item 4.A. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers de la Torre, Brock, Negrete, Davis, Parra Mayor Pro Tem McCowan, Mayor Himmelrich
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTIONS:

CITY HOLIDAYS

11. Adopt Resolution No. 11406 (CCS) entitled “A RESOLUTION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA

DECLARING CESAR CHAVEZ DAY AND JUNETEENTH AS
CITY HOLIDAYS”, was presented
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution implementing Cesar Chavez Day and Juneteenth as official city holidays.

There was no one present for public comment.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9868DC5D-E865-4855-A039-88C55BF50BCC 3 March 15, 2022
Motion by Councilmember de la Torre, seconded by Councilmember Negrete, to adopt the staff recommendation. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Parra, Davis, Negrete, Brock, de la Torre Mayor Pro Tem McCowan, Mayor Himmelrich
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

COUNCILMEMBER
DISCUSSION ITEMS:

SAMOHI GRAD NITE

13.A Request of Councilmembers Negrete and Brock that the City Council allocate $10,000 of discretionary funds to Samohi Grad Nite, a 501(c)3, to enable over 165 low-income students to attend. This would close the shortfall between previous City funding allocated as part of the annual budget and the organization’s expenses for June 2022. For over 30 years, Grad Nite has provided a safe, secure venue for graduating Santa Monica High School seniors to celebrate their achievements, was presented.

Member of the public Jennifer Smith spoke on the recommended action.

Motion by Councilmember Negrete, seconded by Councilmember Brock, to adopt the staff recommendation. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers de la Torre, Brock, Negrete, Davis, Parra Mayor Pro Tem McCowan, Mayor Himmelrich
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
STUDY SESSION:

SENATE BILL 9

4.A Study Session on California Senate Bill 9: The California Housing Opportunity and More Efficiency ("HOME”) Act, was presented.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Review and comment on the impacts of Senate Bill 9,
the California Housing Opportunity and More
Efficiency (HOME) Act, in Santa Monica;
2) Provide direction to staff regarding concepts to be
considered in an implementation ordinance; and
3) Direct staff to return with an ordinance to codify
regulations for implementation of SB 9 that are within
the City’s discretion.

There was no one present for public comment.

Questions asked and answered of staff including setbacks and how they DocuSign Envelope ID: 9868DC5D-E865-4855-A039-88C55BF50BCC 4 March 15, 2022
differ per neighborhood; how will this effect the Pico Neighborhood; parcel size; what bus lines are running frequently and how will it effect parking requirements; will this do away with the ability to adopt a tree ordinance; how will the City provide enforcement to monitor whether the unit is owner occupied; can anything be done to stop the automatic administrative approval process and protect the 2,000 properties listed as historic resource inventory; can dual projects be completed on one lot (an ADU project and an SB 9 project); is there any data that shows that this would offer more affordable housing for families and therefore bringing more families to the City; will this benefit current residents or new residents more; what does OP1 mean and what will the impact be there; requirements for homes in the earthquake zone; are there special City requirements for the liquefaction zones; can high punitive sanctions be imposed to discourage speculators; will parking in the coastal zone trump the SB9’s parking requirements; why wouldn’t on-site affordable units for SB9 projects be feasible; and would it be possible to incentivize larger ADUs.

Considerable discussion ensued on topics including, but not limited to purchase only units in certain neighborhoods; fines for speculators; concerns raised by the letter issued by the State Attorney General today; how to maximize ADUs in high resource areas to further fair housing; exclusions to those who cannot afford homeownership by only allowing for ownership for ADUs; providing opportunities to residents to create income in order to afford property taxes; parking concerns; the loss of the family dynamic in the City; and restricting SB9 units for ownership in certain areas.

Direction: provide more options for applicability of the ADU law and to seek clarity on the requirement of the three year owner occupancy and the ability to implement penalties.

CONTINUED ITEMS:
438 SAN VICENTE BLVD.

5.A Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of Conditional Use Permit and Minor Modification for Expansion of Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente Blvd, was continued to April 12, 2022.

Motion by Mayor Pro Tem McCowan, seconded by Councilmember Negrete, to continue the appeal of Planning Commission Approval Conditional Use Permit for Carlthorp School to April, 12, 2022. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers de la Torre, Brock, Negrete, Davis, Parra Mayor Pro Tem McCowan, Mayor Himmelrich
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ADJOURNMENT On order of the Mayor, the City Council meeting adjourned at 10:09 p.m.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9868DC5D-E865-4855-A039-88C55BF50BCC 5 March 15, 2022
ATTEST: APPROVED:

Nikima S. Newsome Sue Himmelrich
Assistant City Clerk Mayor
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9868DC5D-E865-4855-A039-88C55BF50BCC

← All documents from this meeting