Santa Monica City Council
May 10, 2022

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT
The City of Santa Monica Has Denied Me a Fair Process and Has Denied Me My Due Process Rights
The City of Santa Monica (the “City”) has not conducted the appeal process in a fair manner. The City and its employees (“Staff”) have misled me and acted with bias. The City has unfairly favored the Carlthorp School (the “Applicant”) against my interests as the Appellant.

The City did not notify me until weeks after setting the 2/22/2022 hearing date and weeks after notifying the Applicant that that date had been set and more than 10 days after I first began making inquiries that that date had been set based on rumors I had heard. For these reasons, additional reasons specified herein and expressed through emails and phone calls with the City, reasons expressed in my initial appeal statement, various actions and inactions taken by the City, and for reasons that might be buried in documents withheld by the City and yet undiscovered documents and events, I have been denied a fair process and my due process rights. And, I have not been treated fairly by the City, as compared to the Applicant in this matter.

I made clear to the City on several occasions over the past 13 months that I intended to submit a supplement to my appeal statement (my “Supplemental Statement”) and that I needed to be informed as to what would be the deadline for my submitting my Supplemental Statement. And, the City gave me every indication several times over at least the following eight months or more that it would inform me as to what would be the deadline for my submitting my Supplemental Statement. However, the City failed to provide me with any such deadline. The City improperly, therefore, published its Staff Report without my having submitted my Supplemental Statement. The process has not been fair.

The City stonewalled and sandbagged me throughout the process, usually refusing to even respond to my numerous phone messages and emails, all the while attempting to cram down a hearing date upon me without answering my questions regarding fundamental zoning code questions that I have a right to have answered. Even my attempts to reach out to the Planning Director, David Martin, did not elicit responses from Jing Yeo, the Zoning Administrator, or from David Martin. The only way I was able to obtain responses from Jing since May 2021 (and later from David Martin) was for me to contact the City Manager, which I found necessary to do several times beginning in July 2021. Then when Jing did respond, she would not answer my questions and requests for clarifications and confirmation of things she had told me during our telephone conversations on 4/27/2021 and 10/19/2021. She did answer some of my questions but she refused to answer, clarify, and confirm the most important of my questions and issues that I addressed to her in my emails. Her “answers” were generally vague and opaque and also absolutely not on point. And, I told her that she was refusing to answer my Item 6.A
02/22/22
125 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

questions. Jing then insisted that she was not refusing to answer my questions. I responded that she absolutely was refusing to answer my questions. On 2/1/2022, I even simplified two or three crucial questions into yes or no questions with requests for explanations. Her response after nine months of repeatedly asking her these questions on 2/8/2022 was that my questions were not relevant and therefore she would not answer them – obviously admitting finally that she was and had been indeed refusing to answer my questions all along. However, such questions were relevant, which is proven by how she answered similar questions on the phone in April and October of 2021. (See below.) As I responded to her in my 2/1/2022 email, she did “not [answer my] questions and I [found] it to be outrageously disturbing that [she had] chosen to characterize [her] “answers” as having “thoroughly answered” my questions. Her statement was clearly disingenuous, as is the Staff Report’s Staff Response 8B, to “Questions not answered” (see below).

I told the City (Jing, Regina Szilak (“Gina”), David Martin, David White, and others) several times each in multiple emails over several months and on the phone that:

I still am waiting for answers and clarifications to crucial questions that are prerequisites to additional questions that build on such issues. It is completely unrealistic and certainly unreasonable to hold the hearing or even set a date until:

First I need answers and clarifications to my 7/26/2021 and 5/12/2021 emails; Second, I need to then formulate and ask the follow up questions that are now and have been pending; then Third, I’ll need Jing, the Zoning Administrator, to answer those additional follow up questions; then Fourth (assuming there would be no additional iterative rounds of questions), I would need time to prepare my supplement to my appeal; and then Fifth, Staff would need time to consider my supplement and then after that prepare the Staff Report, sufficiently in advance of the hearing.

I made it clear to Jing and Gina, more than a year ago and dozens of times since, that I needed my Supplemental Statement to be incorporated into the Staff Report and that I need to know what the deadline would be for submitting my Supplemental Statement.

Such deadline, of course, could not be determined until a hearing date would be set.

Eventually, after months of being stonewalled and sandbagged regarding getting my very relevant and crucial questions answered and having a hearing date crammed down without allowing me to get my questions answered – questions that I had been assured by David Martin that I have a right to have answered – I then emailed and left a voicemail for David White again on 2/2/2022. David White up until then had given me the clear impression that he would make sure that I would get my questions answered sufficiently in time for me to prepare my Supplemental Statement. (Every time after I emailed, or spoke with, David White Jing would shortly thereafter email me regarding my questions, although much of it was vague, opaque, and off point.) Included in my 2/2/2022 email to David White, I said:

Item 6.A
02/22/22
126 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

“Please intervene and require that the hearing date be postponed and please require that (1) the Zoning Administrator properly answer, confirm, and clarify my questions and requests for confirmations and clarifications regarding the Zoning Code and the Applicant’s proposed project; and (2) require that the Planning Division not contemplate a hearing date until I have fully received the answers and clarifications that I have been requesting and expect to request.” David Martin called me that same day, February 2 – obviously in response to David White telling him to deal with me. I again told David Martin that I needed to get my questions answered before I could begin preparing my Supplemental Statement. David Martin again told me that he wanted to get my questions answered. When I hadn’t heard from Jing again, I emailed David White again on 2/6/2022 with similar requests as I had said in my 2/2/2022 email, and I left a voicemail for him on 2/7/2022. David White replied with an email on 2/8/2022, inviting me for a meeting with him and David Martin and to work with his assistant to schedule the hearing. David White’s assistant told me that the earliest a meeting could be scheduled was for 2/17/2022. Obviously, my purpose in accepting an invitation to such a meeting was to obtain a postponement and to set an agenda for getting my questions and requests for clarifications and confirmations answered, for which I had been requesting for more than 13 months and for which I had been stonewalled for the past more than nine months.

I had every reason to believe that a postponement was forthcoming. David Martin had assured me on 10/5/2021 on the phone that I had a right to have my questions answered.

I had a legal opinion from an attorney who works in this area of the law and who has close ties with the City that I had a right to have my questions answered. All of my emails to Jing and to Gina at least since October had been copied to David White and to David Martin. Every time that I reached out to David White (and John Jalili before him) complaining that I wasn’t getting my questions answered, I would get a quick response from Jing, each time providing some response to my questions and requests for confirmations and clarifications, but inadequate, vague, opaque, unspecific, and off the point of my questions. I had every reason to believe that a postponement was forthcoming.

When David White on 2/8/2022 invited me to meet with him and David Martin, he led me to believe that he would postpone the hearing when we were to meet on 2/17/2022, but he ultimately refused. If he wasn’t going to postpone the hearing, he should have told me when he invited me to the meeting or at least in the ensuing nine days that he would not postpone the hearing. David White also sandbagged me.

No one ever gave me, as had been promised many months before, a deadline for me to submit my Supplemental Statement. The Staff Report was completed at most only a day or two after I met with David White and David Martin when I finally learned that the City was definitely intending to go forth with the hearing on 2/22/2022, many weeks after informing the Applicant that that date had been set for the hearing. I was thus also denied the ability to provide my Supplemental Statement to the City in time for Staff to incorporate my Supplemental Statement into the Staff Report.

Item 6.A
02/22/22
127 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

The City has not just incidentally provided an unfair process for me, but has orchestrated the process in an unfair manner. (See additional facts and discussion, below, relating to my responses to Attachment E, #8A – D.)
Due to the above very unfair circumstances, I have had to focus on this statement and organizing and submitting documents for the hearing at the last minute to protect the record and I have thus not had time to notify and remind most of my neighbors who would be interested in attending the hearing. Therefore, it is likely that the turn out in favor of this appeal and against the proposed project will be substantially diminished, as compared to if I had been treated fairly by the City. And, most or all of the Applicant’s supporters are either students (and parents of students) or employees or consultants who the Applicant has paid to attend the hearing and who do not even live in the neighborhood or in Santa Monica.

Some of the few neighbors who I did speak to in passing who live within the notice radius have told me that they did not receive any notice cards relating to this appeal.

Furthermore, this project impacts neighbors beyond the notice radius due to noise, traffic congestion, and particularly parking. The Applicant impacts on-street parking for a distance of multiple blocks because the Applicant has only approximately 34 parking spaces for a faculty of 80 and the parents of 280 children, many of whom park their cars to drop off and/or pick up their children, and for numerous events.

The Staff Report, the City Council STOA, and the City Council Report are all confusing because they make references to exhibits and other documents that are not posted with these reports and on the Agenda and which are not readily available on the Agenda page.

And, these reports make ambiguous references to different sets of exhibits using the same referenced name but are referring to different exhibits. As such, the item is defective and it is confusing. Staff also failed to post crucial pages of Plans that were sent to me but were not disclosed to the public at large.

Staff members violated the City’s ordinances and its policies and procedures, including violating the City of Santa Monica Code of Ethics.

I also submitted an objection to the public notice of this hearing because it didn’t specify that the City Council is ruling on CEQA exemptions. As such, the public will not have an opportunity to adequately question and challenge such exemptions or prepare for that.

For all of the above, and below, reasons the City should postpone the hearing and/or rule in favor of my appeal.

The Planning Commission Hearing Process
One other thing that I found to be very frustrating regarding the Planning Commission hearing process was that after the Staff, the Applicant, and the public presented and spoke, the Planning Commission then addressed some issues and concerns and began Item 6.A
02/22/22
128 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

“solving problems” while simultaneously shutting out the public, particularly considering that utilizing virtual hearings in the manner that it did, the City was preventing the Planning Commissioners from even feeling the mood of the public in response to the Commissioners’ proposals. Some of these “solutions” had not yet been suggested to the in any public filings and the public had not had any notice that such “solutions” would be introduced. Planning Commissioners proposed but mostly imposed “solutions” some of which would cause more problems than they would solve. (See, for example, my discussion (below) regarding landscape screening in my fourth bullet point, in the section named The City Council Report.) For one, I don’t think it was proper for the Planning Commission to have proposed and voted on alternative “solutions” to concerns in a manner that had not been first vetted by the public and that the public was not permitted to provide any input whatsoever. I ask that the City Council not act with expedience on issues that might seem minor but that are very crucial in the lives of Santa Monica residents.

The Applicant’s and Staff’s Parcel Coverage Calculations of the Proposed Project are Incorrect and Exceed the Allowable Limit Under the Code, Including With the Minor Modification that the Applicant Requests
Parcel Coverage Calculations
The Parcel Coverage Calculations, as performed on Plan pages A121-B and A122-B, as revised approximately in March 2021, are inaccurate and substantially understate the actual parcel coverage of the proposed project. Such calculations have several errors.

One such error is that it treats the “Main Level” as depicted on Plan page A121-C as the First Floor and the “Upper Level” as the Second Floor. (See Plan pgs. A121-B, and A122-B.) The “Lower Level,” as depicted in Plan page A120-C, is actually the First Floor – or First Story – and the “Main Level,” as also depicted in Plan page A121-C, is the Second Story. The “Upper Level,” as depicted in Plan page A122-C, is actually a non-conforming Third Story. The “Lower Level” does not meet the definition of a basement, as defined by the SMMC. (See SMMC 9.52.020.0230.) The First Floor Parcel Coverage Calculation is incorrect and inaccurately excludes, for example, the Storage room, as depicted on Plan page A120-B. The Second Floor Parcel Coverage Calculation is also incorrect and inaccurately excludes, for example, the Classroom in the southeast corner of the building and much of the blue-shaded area, as depicted on Plan page A121- B. (I could not find the Plan pages on the City’s Agenda page or in any documents listed and linked on that page that are referred to in this paragraph and in this section, below.

However, such Plan pages were produced by the Applicant in a 9-page pdf set and submitted to the City. These pages show and help show that the proposed project violates the Zoning Code. It is not clear why Staff failed to include such important pages with the Agenda. However, I am submitting these pages along with other materials.) Prohibited Third Story Addition
Item 6.A
02/22/22
129 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

Furthermore, the Applicant proposes adding to its nonconforming Third Story, which is strictly prohibited under the Zoning Code. The Zoning Code only permits two story structures in the Applicant’s zone. (See SMMC 9.08.030 (Development Standards) (limiting number of stories in the R2 District to 2 stories).) The Applicant’s Building’s Lower Level is Not a Basement, it is the First Story
In response to my questions, on 4/27/2021 and on 10/19/2021 on the phone, Jing, the Zoning Administrator, unequivocally told me that everything in dark green on Plan page A120-C is all on the same level for any and all purposes and applications and interpretations of the zoning code, including for the definition of a basement. On those calls Jing also unequivocally told me that all of the Dark Blue and the Medium Blue areas on Plan page A121-C are all on one level for all purposes, applications, and interpretations of the zoning code, including for the definition of a basement. On those calls Jing also unequivocally told me that all of the Dark Pink area on Plan page A122-C is all on one level for all purposes, applications, and interpretations of the zoning code, including for the definition of a basement.

As noted, above, the Applicant’s plans, calculations, and the proposal assumes that, what the Applicant refers to as the “Lower Level” as a “basement,” however, in fact the existing building does not have a “basement” as defined under the SMMC.

Basement, is defined by the SMMC as:

9.52.020.0230 Basement. The level(s) of a structure located below Average Natural Grade, Segmented Average Natural Grade, or Theoretical Grade, in which no portion of the level directly below Average Natural Grade, Segmented Average Natural Grade, or Theoretical Grade projects more than 3 feet above Average Natural Grade, Segmented Average Natural Grade, or Theoretical Grade.

Up to 4 wall surfaces of the level directly below Average Natural Grade, Segmented Average Natural Grade, or Theoretical Grade may be exposed above Finished Grade, so long as this exposure does not exceed 40% of each of these wall surface areas. Each wall surface area is calculated by multiplying the height by the length of the wall. In addition, the visible wall surface height of these walls shall not exceed 3 feet above Finished Grade, except for an entrance to a garage, which must be designed to the minimum feasible width and not exceed the maximum size requirements set forth in Chapter 9.28, or for any light well or emergency egress as required by the Building Code. A basement shall not be considered a story.
(SMMC 9.52.020.0230.)
Analyzing the First Criterion in the Definition of a Basement First, I’ll analyze the first sentence of Section 9.52.020.0230, which says: “The level(s) of a structure located below Average Natural Grade, Segmented Average Natural Grade, or Theoretical Grade, in which no portion of the level directly below Average Natural Item 6.A
02/22/22
130 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

Grade, Segmented Average Natural Grade, or Theoretical Grade projects more than 3 feet above Average Natural Grade, Segmented Average Natural Grade, or Theoretical Grade.” The Applicant utilizes Average Natural Grade (“ANG”) in all of its plans and in its proposal. According to the City’s Zoning Administrator and the plain text of the ordinance, if any portion of the Lower Level projects more than 3 feet above ANG, then the entire Lower Level is not a basement, and would therefore be the First Story.

As can be seen on Plan page A300-B/C, ANG is at 104 and ½ feet (104’-6”), and 3 feet above ANG is at 107 and ½ feet (107’-6”) (104.5’ + 3’ = 107.5’). ANG on Plan page A300B/C is also depicted as a horizontal broken red line. As can be seen on Plan page A300B/C, the Lower Level projects above ANG. Plan page A120-C shows the floor of the Lower Level at 97 and ¼ feet (97’3”), which is 7 feet below ANG. The Lower Level projects all the way to the surface of the floor above it. (SMMC 9.52.020.2320 defines Story as: “That portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor and the upper surface of the floor next above. . . .”) Looking at Plan pages A120-C and A121-C, it is clearly evident that the Lower Level projects 4 and ¼ feet (or 4’ 3”) above ANG. (See the Dark Blue portion of the Main Level on Plan page A121-C, which displays the floor of the Main Level and upper range of the Lower Level as being 1 and ¼ feet (1’ – 3”) above the Light Blue portion of the Main Level, which has a floor level of 107 and ½ feet (107’ – 6”), which is already 3 feet above ANG (107.5’ + 1.25’ = 108.75’; also, 108.75’ – 104.5’ = 4.25’). Thus, the Kitchen, the Board Room, the Reception Front Office, both of Classroom – 1st Grade and a lot of other space on the Main Level, have their floor at more than 3 feet above ANG and thus, the Lower Level space below it all projects 4 and ¼ feet above ANG, which is more than 3 feet above ANG. Because the Zoning Code’s definition of a basement says that “no portion of the level directly below” ANG may project “more than 3 feet above” ANG, the entire Lower Level is not a basement and is thus the First Story. Jing confirmed this to me on the phone in April 2021.

The Applicant’s plans that were used in their expansion approximately 25 years ago also display the same result. Those plans, Plan page A-5.2.1 (dated May 02, 1997) depicts large portions of the Applicant’s Lower Level as projecting all the way to 108.75’ (108 and ¾ feet), which is 4.25 feet above ANG (108.75’ – 104.5’ = 4.25’). (See also Plan page A-6.2 (dated May 02, 1997.)
Analyzing the Fourth Criterion in the Definition of a Basement The Lower Level, which the Applicant claims is a basement rather than the First Story, is not a basement also because walls of the Lower Level have visible wall surfaces that exceed 3 feet above Finished Grade. The fourth sentence of SMMC Section

9.52.020.0230, defining “Basement,” says:
“In addition, the visible wall surface height of these walls shall not exceed 3 feet above Finished Grade, except for an entrance to a garage, which must be designed to the minimum feasible width and not exceed the maximum size requirements set forth in Chapter 9.28, or for any light well or emergency egress as required by the Building Code.”
Item 6.A
02/22/22
131 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

This means that if even one visible wall surface height of a level exceeds 3 feet above Finished Grade, then the entire level is not a basement. Several of the Applicant’s Lower Level walls have visible wall surfaces that exceed 3 feet above Finished Grade. Plan page A120-C, depicts the Lower Level. Three of the walls of the Storage room in the southeast corner of the building all have visible wall surfaces that exceed 3 feet above Finished Grade. (See photos.) The westerly, southerly, and easterly walls of the Storage room all have visible wall surfaces that exceed 3 feet above Finished Grade. (See photos.) The wall containing the entrance to the Lower Level, which abuts the Break Out Room and the hallway adjacent to the Break Out Room on the Lower Level also have a visible wall surface that exceed 3 feet above Finished Grade. (See photos.) Even without the photos, it is obvious that the Storage room in the southeast corner of the building has a visible wall surface that exceeds 3 feet above Finished Grade. Plan page A300-B/C, on the top portion of the page, “E/W Section Through Elevated Court Level Diagram shows 3 feet of the Storage room on the Lower Level above the broken red line – the line that delineates where ANG is – and additional wall surface below ANG down to the surface of the parking lot. That wall of the Storage room that abuts the Existing Parking, as depicted on Plan page A300-B/C, both the 3-foot portion of the wall above ANG and the portion below ANG that is above the surface of the Existing Parking is a visible wall surface that exceed 3 feet above Finished Grade. (The wall of the Storage room, referred to here, is on the western side of the Storage room, even though it is depicted on the right side of the Storage room. That is because the diagram at the top of Plan page A300-B/C is viewed from the North.) What Plan page A300-B/C doesn’t show is that the walls of the Storage room on the South and on the East of the room also have visible wall surfaces that exceed 3 feet above Finished Grade. This diagram doesn’t show that the Finished Grade on the South side of the building where the Storage room is located is almost exactly the same as the Finished Grade where the surface of the Existing Parking lot abuts the Storage room. (See photos.) While it is more difficult to see and access, much or all of the walls on the east side of the building have visible wall surfaces that exceed 3 feet above Finished Grade. (See photos.) The eastern side of the Storage room, as displayed on Plan page A120-C, which depicts the Lower Level, has already been shown, above, to have a visible wall surface that exceed 3 feet above Finished Grade. The Faculty Lounge on the northeast corner of the Lower Level, as displayed on Plan page A120-C, has its entire eastern wall from approximately the floor to the ceiling (approximately 8 feet) with a visible wall surface that exceed 3 feet above Finished Grade. (The photos of the eastern wall of the Faculty Lounge on the Lower Level, accompanying this Supplement, were taken with bushes and a chain linked fence between the camera and the eastern wall and the surface of the abutting Finished Grade, making it somewhat difficult to see; but, if one looks carefully, it is obvious that the visible wall surface on the eastern wall of the Faculty Lounge has several feet, more than six feet of visible wall surface, above Finished Grade.) The Lower Level is clearly not a basement. A similar perspective can also be seen in the Carlthorp School Plans from approximately 25 years ago, page P-3, dated October 22, 1997, and approved under a previous zoning code, 11/12/1997.

Item 6.A
02/22/22
132 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

The Lower Level also violates other aspects of the definition of a basement. (SMMC

9.52.020.0230.)
No Basement, Three Stories, Incorrect Parcel Coverage Calculations, Minor Modification Application is Insufficient to Build Proposed Project, and Prohibited Third Story Additions
Therefore, the Lower Level is not a basement as the Applicant asserts. (Perhaps the City’s Planning Department failed to actually inspect the property and instead relied only on the plans in determining that the Applicant’s proposed project satisfied the zoning code.) Instead, the Lower Level is the First Story, the Main Level is the Second Story, and the Upper Level is the Third Story. All parcel coverage calculations are based on the wrong information and are incorrect and thus the public disclosures are all incorrect and the public has not been adequately notified and the City has not adequately reviewed the project. The actual parcel coverage exceeds the amounts being asked for in the Applicant’s application. Additions to the Third Story are being proposed, which are strictly prohibited by the Zoning Code. Staff should not have recommended that the proposed project be approved and the City Council should confirm my appeal and deny the Applicant from being granted approval.

The Proposed Multipurpose Room is a Classroom
The Zoning Code requires additional parking to be added if the proposed project adds even a single classroom. (Please see Appeal Form: Attached Sheets for Case No. 20ENT-0275, Appeal by Steven Salsberg of Case Number 19ENT-0250 (CUP); 20ENT0066 (Minor Modification), at 438 San Vicente Boulevard, at 5 –7 (section titled, The Applicant’s Cover-up and Rationalization of the Additional Classroom Space) (describing in more detail how the multipurpose room will serve as a classroom).

The proposed multipurpose room, in Planning Commission Hearing (11/4/2020) Attachment J, says that it will be used for "Orchestra practices" and "Theatrical practice" and an "Indoor climbing wall for PE" and "CPR training for employees" and "Professional development for faculty." These are all instructional activities involving instructors and students. (Regarding training for employees and professional development for faculty, such activity does involve instructing students, except that in such activity, the employees and faculty members are the "students.") As such, by definition, when any of these activities are taking place, the multipurpose room would be serving as a classroom. The Applicant has repeatedly said, dating back to its initial application in 2019, that it would be conducting such instructional classroom activities in the proposed multipurpose room. All three of those applications, clearly state that the Applicant intends to use the Multi-purpose room for teaching classes.

The Applicant admitted that its proposed “subterranean multi-purpose room” would be used for teaching classes and as classroom space when it said that the proposed expansion would be used for “performances and other K-6 educational activities, which Item 6.A
02/22/22
133 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

include music and performing arts classes.” (See City of Santa Monica – City Planning Division, Discretionary Permit Application, for 438 San Vicente Blvd, for a Minor Modification (not dated or signed), attached sheets Project Description (“Minor Mod Project Description”), at 2.) It made such admission three times in three separate applications over the period of almost a year, relating to this proposed project. (Please see Appeal Form: Attached Sheets for Case No. 20ENT-0275, Appeal by Steven Salsberg of Case Number 19ENT-0250 (CUP); 20ENT0066 (Minor Modification), at 438 San Vicente Boulevard, at 5 –7 (section titled, The Applicant’s Cover-up and Rationalization of the Additional Classroom Space) (describing in more detail how the multipurpose room will serve as a classroom).

The Planning Department added Condition 17 to prevent the multipurpose room from being used as a classroom. However, Condition 17 is unenforceable. The proposed Multi-purpose room is subterranean and any teaching activity would be undetectable and the City continues to refuse to enforce ongoing violations of existing CUP Conditions and SMMC violations at the school. All the more so, the City would not likely enforce Condition 17, which is not visible to the naked eye. Also, Condition 17 is selfcontradictory because it says that the “multi-purpose room shall be used in the manner described in Attachment J of the staff report and shall not be used as a classroom.” Attachment J contains multiple uses that are clearly classroom activities, and thus Condition 17 is self-contradictory, and it is unenforceable even if the City’s enforcement agencies had the will to enforce it.

Because the Multipurpose Room is a Classroom, Additional Parking Spaces Are Required
Because the multipurpose room is a classroom, the Applicant must add parking spaces.

Because the proposed project does not call for adding parking spaces, the proposed project does not satisfy the Zoning Code and the Appeal must be accepted and the proposed project must be denied by the City Council.

Parking Issues
From the STOA Conditions that was passed by the Planning Commission in 11/4/2020:

Condition # 6 calls for special planning only for events that are expected to exceed 150 vehicles. That is an absurdly high number for this neighborhood. The School only has approximately 34 parking spaces for its 80 employees. The Condition is all but impossible to enforce.

First, the Condition doesn’t clarify if the expected number of vehicles includes employee vehicles or only additional vehicles. Second, the school can always say that it “expected” fewer vehicles. There is no advance mechanism to assure the neighborhood that reasonable precautions will be made and followed.

Item 6.A
02/22/22
134 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

When the Applicant expanded 25 years ago, it obtained its variance on parking, based on statements and information provided to the City, including that it intended to expand its total faculty from 22 people (15 full time and 7 part time) to 32 people (15 full time and 7 part time), which was a comparable percentage increase to their planned enrollment expansion of slightly less than 50% at that time. (See Letter from Arthur L. Kassan, Consulting Traffic Engineer, to Ronald K. Fuchiwaki, City Parking & Traffic Engineer, dated 6/13/1995, at 1.) The Applicant in 1996 received a variance to allow for their parking configuration, which would have been sufficient to support their “planned” staff of 32 people. However, the Applicant’s staff swelled to 80 people after receiving their CUP and variance in 1996. When the Applicant received its variance and its CUP in 1996, it deceived the Planning Commission and the City. When the parking analysis was conducted, the City relied on the Applicant telling the City that it was only expanding to 32 people (including part time employees), rather than expanding the staff to 80 people.

By no means does the Applicant have sufficient parking spaces available to accommodate its needs, and thus heavily burdens its neighbors, in the surrounding blocks and further.

The Applicant violated its commitments to the City regarding faculty size and should not be permitted to expand further. In fact, the Applicant should be required to reduce its faculty to the level that it committed to the City and its neighbors 25 years ago at approximately 32 people. The granting of any expansion should require such a condition.

The Applicant now says, again, that it won't increase its faculty size. Nonsense.

Empirically, the Applicant has demonstrated that it couldn't be trusted to keep its word then; it should not be trusted to keep its word now.

The school’s deficient parking causes faculty and visitors to the school to park in the surrounding neighborhood, taking away space from local residents.

The Applicant has argued in the past, as it did to the Planning Commission, that it somewhat mitigates these parking concerns because it is friendly with a neighboring landlord who leases residents to some of its faculty. Such argument should be completely disregarded because the Applicant does not have an entitlement to use such parking spaces and it is completely possible that in the future, no such relationship will exist.

Noise Concerns
I cannot overstate how much of a burden that the noise that the Applicant generates is upon its neighbors. The noise study that the Applicant presented is misleading. The noise pollution that the Applicant generates disrupts the peace and quiet in the neighborhood in a major way.

Some of the noise concerns are: Children screaming, whistles, P.A. systems and loud speakers, loud noises from vehicles and people congregating in the large open parking lot off the alley (Georgina Place), organized cheering and screaming, outdoor amplified music and rallies. The school also uses “Walkie-Talkies” and whistles, which are particularly grating upon the nerves. Sometimes the Applicant invites musical and other Item 6.A
02/22/22
135 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

groups that bring in their own amplification system. The Applicant should be prohibited from doing any of these.

The Applicant should also be prohibited from bringing in temporary speakers and amplification, such as for an event. The Condition 9 language should be modified to include prohibition of speakers anytime, not to exceed 3 minutes during morning assembly and not at any other time, except for emergencies. Even use of amplified speakers during morning assembly is unnecessary and invasive to the community and should be prohibited.

The noise study that the Applicant submitted cited incorrect decibel limits from the SMMC that were higher than the code actually indicates. The noise study and its analysis and conclusions is flawed and should therefore be disregarded. (See also, discussion relating to Attachment E, #6A – D.) Traffic
Traffic caused from employees and also parents dropping off and picking up children is excessive. Twice a day a line of cars circle the block, double-parked and blocking traffic, creating excessive traffic for vehicles and substantial hazard for vehicles, pedestrians, and animals.

Faculty, parents, and children commonly trespass neighboring properties on their way to and from school.

Sunshine, Sunlight, and Heat
Building the rooftop play court would block sunlight and direct sun from my windows, and reduce sunlight that enters my home. The rooftop play court should not be allowed.

I rely on the sun entering my windows facing the Applicant to grow, ripen, and mature most of the food that I eat. I have a right to that sunshine and sunlight and I need it for my food. The sun in the morning helps to jumpstart the warming of my home, particularly in the late winter, springtime, and the early fall. The sun in the morning also helps to jumpstart me, to ward off Seasonal Affective Disorder, from which I struggle with. The Applicant should not be permitted to build the rooftop play court, or at least not within approximately 40 feet of the western side of the existing building.

Appellant’s Response to Staff’s Attachment E, “Detailed Response to Appeal Statement”
Staff’s Attachment E, “Detailed Response to Appeal Statement” (“Attachment E”), is littered with misleading statements and ignores the actual facts and the law.

Topic 1A) Upper level exceeds parcel coverage: Staff has ignored the fact that the parcel coverage calculations were conducted incorrectly. (See, above, The Applicant’s and Item 6.A
02/22/22
136 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

Staff’s Parcel Coverage Calculations of the Proposed Project are Incorrect and Exceed the Allowable Limit Under the Code, Including With the Minor Modification that the Applicant Requests.)
Topic 2A) Operating detrimental to surrounding properties: Obviously Code Compliance or anyone else failed to inspect or visit the Applicant’s site at night where it would have seen powerful flood lights that shine into neighbor’s windows all night long. I’ve complained to Code Enforcement and to the police numerous times regarding various violations but they never do anything. (See photo.)
Topic 2B) No further permits should be allowed to be issued due to CUP violations: The 95CUP-012, Condition #31 says that if the Applicant “fails to comply with any conditions of the [1996 STOA], no further permits, licenses, approvals or certificates of occupancy shall be issued until such violation has been fully remedied.” Staff admits that there are at least two ongoing violations of conditions of the Applicant’s existing CUP (95-CUP-012). These violations (and others) have existed since prior to this century, without any mitigation. Staff is acting irresponsibly by recommending that the Santa Monica City Council ignore the fact that the Applicant is a serial violator of its CUP conditions. Condition #31 is a standard condition in virtually all of the CUPs that the City grants, and I think is a requirement under the SMMC. The Santa Monica City Council should abide by the City’s own policy of requiring compliance before granting any additional entitlements to the Applicant. If Staff were truly objective – as it should be but for which it is obviously not – Staff would not be recommending that the Santa Monica City Council deny my appeal. (See 2E and 2F, below.) Topic 2C) Existing Landscaping exceeds height limits: The trees on the westerly border of the Applicant’s property are planted excessively close together and, thus, are a de facto hedge and/or wall, and exceed height limits.

Topic 2D) Existing plan for pick-up/drop-off does not work: The neighbors should have been directly solicited regarding this issue, before any additional entitlements are granted.

The chain of vehicles that line up around San Vicente Blvd, onto 4th Street, and onto and way up Georgina Avenue for pick-up and drop-off creates a serious safety hazard for the community and causes serious traffic interference for the neighborhood. Drivers of these vehicles commonly violate the Motor Vehicle Code and block intersections to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. This issue is a very serious matter due to the dangerous and hazardous conditions imposed by the Applicant and because life is so precious. This neighborhood is a very quiet and peaceful residential neighborhood – except for the Carlthorp School.

Topic 2E) Grass surface replaced without approval: In Attachment G (to the 11/4/2020 Planning Commission hearing), the Annotated 1996 STOA, the Applicant admitted that it defied Condition #59 of its existing CUP, essentially disrespecting the City and its neighbors by unilaterally tearing out its grass – that it is required to have and maintain – and replacing it with artificial turf that, instead of emitting fresh oxygen as grass does, emits harmful noxious fumes that adversely affect the health of its neighbors and caused Item 6.A
02/22/22
137 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

my dear sweet mother to suffer and contributed to her demise. The Applicant apparently misled the Planning Commission and the public again, here, by rationalizing and not disclosing the real reason the Applicant replaced the required grass with artificial turf: so that the Applicant could produce noisy outdoor activity all day long instead of only on a limited basis. The Applicant has admitted that it is – and has been for many years – in violation of this condition of the 1996 STOA; Condition #31 prohibits the Applicant from receiving any additional entitlements “until such violation has been fully remedied,” which it has not (with respect to this Condition #59 and other Conditions); and therefore, the Planning Commission should not have approved the Applicant’s proposals. Artificial turf also prevents rainwater from seeping into the soil and down into the water table. (See 2B, above.)
Topic 2F) Obstructed clear view through front fence:

The Applicant is, and has obviously been openly defying its CUP for a number of years on a continuing basis, not in compliance with this Condition. This Condition requires that the front yard fence and landscaping shall be “installed and maintained so as not to obstruct a clear view through the fence.” It is plainly obvious to anyone passing by the Applicant’s parcel in the front on San Vicente Boulevard that the view through the fence is completely obstructed. Photos taken 21 months ago depict that obstructed view. (Please see photos attached to my 5/20/2020 comment letter that were taken on 5/19/2020.) The view today is still obstructed. I have photos taken on the day of the November 4, 2020 Planning Commission hearing, and on 2/20/2022, which prove that the view is completely obstructed. The Applicant is also in open defiance of SMMC Section 9.08.030.F.4., which requires that Applicant’s courtyard “shall be visible and accessible from the sidewalk.” Pursuant to the 1996 STOA, Condition #31, the Santa Monica City Council should not approve the Applicant’s application because the Applicant was not in compliance with its existing CUP. (See 2B, above.) 2H) Inconsistency of prior assertions by applicant regarding student enrollment and number of staff: Staff misunderstands my assertions. I am saying that the Applicant made representations to the City and to the public that it would only increase its employee staff from 22 full and part time employees to 34 full and part time employees and that the City and the public relied on such representations when the process occurred in granting the Applicant its current CUP. The City should require that the Applicant reduce its staff level to approximately the level that it represented to the City and to the public when it was granted its current CUP. If any entitlements are granted to the Applicant, such entitlements should be conditioned upon limiting Applicant’s staff to approximately 34 people. And, certainly any language in any conditions should not prevent the public from asserting these issues in the future. In other words, any entitlements and conditions should not say or imply that the Applicant may have a staff level as high as any specified number above approximately 34 people. 3A) Number of stories: Staff overlooks the fact that the Lower Level of the building does not meet the code requirements to be a basement and is therefore a three-story building. (See section, above, named The Applicant’s and Staff’s Parcel Coverage Calculations of Item 6.A
02/22/22
138 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

the Proposed Project are Incorrect and Exceed the Allowable Limit Under the Code, Including With the Minor Modification that the Applicant Requests.) 3E) Offices within apartment: This conversion occurred for several years earlier this century and through much of the last decade. (I did not say that the conversion was still ongoing. They closed those offices probably in preparation for their current application.) I referred to that conversion to illustrate that the Applicant has disrespected and flouted the Planning Commission and the laws of the City and to suggest that the Applicant is cavalier regarding respecting City ordinances, its CUP conditions, and its neighbors. 3F) School did not engage in neighborhood outreach: There was a public meeting, which I went to, but the meeting was very brief, substantially shorter than had been announced.

I had various questions that I raised after the meeting but still within the scheduled time.

Before I had an opportunity to ask all of my questions, several other members from the public that had remained and I were all asked to leave. I, not the Applicant, reached out by calling Tim Kusserow a few months later to discuss the project, but that was like speaking with a block wall. A few neighbors and I later arranged a conference call with Mr. Kusserow (or possibly someone else at the school), but that experience was also fruitless. Mr. Kusserow left the call after a short while and I was not permitted to even speak during the call. I later reached out to the Applicant’s law firm, who responded by having Melissa Sweeney contact me. But she had no authority to consider actual public concerns. She told me that she would get back to me but she didn’t, even after I subsequently tried to reach her. I am not aware of any other so-called outreach. The only public outreach was a perfunctory effort to present minimal information to the public. It was not true public outreach because there was zero receptivity by the Applicant regarding any and all public input. The Applicant was completely dismissive of any public input. It is disingenuous to describe the Applicant’s contact with the public as actual “outreach.”
4A) Parking requirement for classroom vs multipurpose room: The Staff here has it backwards. The Applicant has provided a description of the multipurpose room, which clearly states that it WILL be used as a classroom. (See section named The Multipurpose Room is a Classroom, above; and see, Appeal Form: Attached Sheets for Case No. 20ENT-0275, Appeal by Steven Salsberg of Case Number 19ENT-0250 (CUP); 20ENT0066 (Minor Modification), at 438 San Vicente Boulevard, at 5 –7 (section titled, The Applicant’s Cover-up and Rationalization of the Additional Classroom Space) (describing in more detail how the multipurpose room will serve as a classroom). ) And, Condition #17, which purportedly is intended to deal with this issue is self-contradictory and unenforceable. (See id.)
6A) Noise and privacy: The mitigation measures that are proposed are inadequate and in some respects aggravate the problem. (See above, Noise Concerns.) 6B) Noise is excessive when windows are open: This is an example how Staff is only concerned with whether the Applicant is in compliance with the “letter” of the existing CUP and its conditions, as opposed to the spirit of not imposing upon its neighbors and Item 6.A
02/22/22
139 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

the community; or if it can artificially justify the bending or actual breaching of the existing CUP and its conditions. Here, double-paned windows were proposed, when the existing CUP was created, for some of the Applicant’s neighbors, to mitigate the outrageous noise created by the Applicant. However, such measure is completely ineffective during warm and hot days when it is necessary for such neighbors to open windows for air circulation. That amounts to more than half of the school year (plus summer school). I’ve been raising this issue throughout the process these past two years, but the Applicant, Staff, and the Planning Commission have ignored this issue. The City Council should not grant any additional entitlements until the Applicant and Staff actually and sincerely reach out to its neighbors and solve this issue. For more than 20 years this has been a major problem. I have complained numerous times to the Applicant and to law enforcement and nothing has ever been done to mitigate this extremely imposing problem. Children at random suddenly scream with high-pitched voices as loud as they can. Adults suddenly blow whistles, lead organized and synchronized cheering, and use walkie-talkies that grate the ears and nerves. The P.A. system suddenly is utilized. Without advance notice, suddenly an event occurs with amplified music, singing, talking, yelling and cheering. All of them randomly and suddenly yell at the top of their lungs. All of this causes enormous stress on the nerves, prevents concentration, and prevents speaking on the phone. And, for the size of the space and the proximity to its neighbors in this otherwise quiet and peaceful neighborhood, the Applicant very unreasonably imposes itself upon its neighbors and the Planning Department and the City has made unfair rationalizations on behalf of the Applicant. 6C) Excessive noise: This is another example how the existing CUP conditions were not well planned. The existing Condition #56, which requires staggering of playtime, is part of the problem. It would be better to have all playtime occur all at once and get it over with, rather than have it be loud throughout almost the entire day, as is the case now.

That way, on warm and hot days, windows could at least be open part of the day, rather than forcing neighbors to swelter and suffocate the entire day. And, this could occur on a set schedule so that neighbors could have control over their day, rather than the school controlling the neighbors’ days. The City should reverse this condition to require the Applicant to have all playtime coordinated during shorter portions of the day on a set schedule.
6D) Excessive noise: The existing Condition #57 requires playgroups to be dispersed.

However, the opposite is occurring during loud organized cheering. Also, I don’t see how the noise could be much worse so probably the Applicant is not adhering to this condition in other ways.
7A) Privacy impacts: See my fourth bullet point under The City Council Report, relating to page 8 of that report. Also, as I’ve said before in another earlier submission: Faculty, parents, and children commonly trespass neighboring properties on their way to and from school.
8A) Documents withheld: I still have not received all of the documents that I have requested from the City pertaining to this appeal
Item 6.A
02/22/22
140 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

8B) Questions not answered:

Staff asserts in its Response to 8B in Attachment E that “Staff has responded to questions during multiple phone and virtual meetings with multiple staff members.” Such statement is grossly misleading. Since I filed the appeal, there were three – and not more than three – phone calls since I filed the appeal when I presented substantive questions.

The first phone call was on 4/14/2021 with Jing Yeo. Most of that call dealt with my asking a threshold question that had to be asked before I could move to the actual questions that I needed to ask. However, Jing was stuck on giving me an answer that defied geometric logic and fundamental rules of geometry, math, and physics. (She was stuck on the notion that a “level” of a structure was based on a single point in such structure and that there were infinite numbers of “levels” related to the corresponding infinite points in a structure. Such notion defies geometric logic and fundamental rules of geometry, math, and physics because a level cannot exist in a single point, or stated another way, in zero dimensional space.) We ran out of time for that call so I asked her to think about it and we’d pick that up on the next call, which we planned for 4/27/2021.

Almost as soon as we began speaking on 4/27/2021, Jing had already come around to my way of thinking.

There was some important progress that I made in asking my questions during those two calls in April and one important question (or group of very similar questions) that was answered on 10/19/2021, which covered only about five minutes of that call in October. (Some of the detail of those answers has been explained above.) But almost everything else about the call on 10/19/2021 was a waste of time, whereby Jing outright refused to answer my questions. There was a trail of thought that I was taking Jing down using diagrams from the Plan pages, in which I was leading her to questions that I was trying to ask and she was finally being receptive. However, David Martin had set that call up with him, Stephanie Reich, and Gina also on the call. I need and needed specific questions answered regarding the zoning code and Jing is the Zoning Administrator, who has the responsibility to explain and clarify the zoning code. My questions were directed at Jing and not Stephanie. However, as I explained to David Martin in my email of 10/29/2021:
“However, my questions are of the nature, which are for the Zoning Administrator, particularly because some of my questions are complicated, and about complicated issues and definitions.… Jing is the Zoning Administrator – not Stephanie. . . . [I]t is her responsibility to make these determinations, and yours I guess as the Director. Multiple times Stephanie disrupted the flow of my questions and descriptions, interrupting because she had difficulty following along, as she indicated. [And, e]ach time Stephanie interrupted, it was just as I was about to get [to where I needed Jing to go in her mind and with the diagrams for me to ask my questions].”
Thus almost all of the 10/29/2021 conference call was a waste of time and I still hadn’t gotten to ask my questions.

Item 6.A
02/22/22
141 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

Staff’s Response to 8B in Attachment E that “Staff has responded to questions during multiple phone and virtual meetings with multiple staff members” is grossly misleading.

Staff’s assertion, in its Response to 8B in Attachment E, “staff has provided written correspondence to comprehensively answer all questions” is absolutely and brazenly FALSE. Staff has stonewalled me and refused to answer my questions, while simultaneously attempting to cram down a hearing down upon me. I began requesting that the Zoning Administrator, Jing Yeo, answer my questions more than 13 months ago in early January 2020. She was very busy for a couple of months and then I had an injury that delayed a couple weeks. In April 2021, Jing and I got off to a good start in phone calls on 4/14/2021 and 4/27/2021, whereby we resolved to continue the process by email.

On 5/12/2021, I sent her an email with various questions and requests for confirmations of what she had told me during April on the phone. She told me that I would receive answers within or shortly after a couple weeks. I followed up with approximately a dozen emails and phone calls when she was not forthcoming. Jing went completely dark on me, failing to respond in any way whatsoever. After that, the only times Jing contacted me was by email and then only after I would explain the circumstances to the City Manager (first John Jalili and then David White) and that I wasn’t getting my questions answered. My first contact with the City Manager, John Jalili, was in early July 2021, and Jing followed up with an email addressing some of my questions. But her answers were vague and opaque and mostly not on point and incomplete. For more than the following seven months, I would promptly reply to her emails regarding my questions, asking her to actually answer my questions. But she would not respond to my email replies, unless and until I contacted the City Manager again, and then and only then would she reply to my emails. I also attempted to reach out to David Martin, the Director of the Planning Department, with numerous emails and phone calls, attempting to get him to motivate Jing to properly answer my emails. The only times David Martin got back to me was shortly after I contacted the City Manager. Additional detail is explained, above, in the section discussing the unfair process. (The email strings with Jing Yeo and David Martin, since 5/12/2021, are being included along with this Supplement.) Staff’s assertion, in its Response to 8B in Attachment E, “staff has provided written correspondence to comprehensively answer all questions” is absolutely and brazenly FALSE.
8C) Premature Planning Commission hearing: “Multiple hearing delays were granted” implies that such delays were granted due to my causing that to be necessary. All delays relating to the Planning Commission hearing were due to the City choosing on its own to delay the hearing date or because the City had failed to follow through on commitments to provide me with information, answers to questions, and documents. Almost all of the delay occurred due to the City’s own choosing for its own reasons. The two delays relating to the City not following through on commitments to me was only one week in May 2020 and approximately two weeks in October 2020, and I still had not received all of the documents that I had asked for when the hearing was held on 11/4/2020.

Item 6.A
02/22/22
142 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

Staff’s assertion, in its Response to 8D in Attachment E, “Multiple hearing delays have been granted” is very misleading. Any and all delays in bringing this matter before the City Council is due to delays caused by the City, except for an approximately two week delay that I needed due to an injury that I suffered in late March 2021. All other delays in this process were due to Jing Yeo, the Zoning Administrator, being too busy to answer my Zoning Code questions during the winter of 2021, and then since 5/12/2021, her refusing to respond to me and her answering my questions and requests for clarifications and confirmations of oral statements in a vague, opaque, unspecific, and off the point manner and also her refusing to answer my questions. (See detailed discussion in response to 8B and in discussions above relating to the unfairness of the process and attached email strings with Jing Yeo, David Martin, Regina Szilak, and David White.) 8D) Requested appellant to confirm February 22, 2022 appeal hearing date on November 29, 2021: The City here makes a false and misleading statement. The City notified me weeks after setting the 2/22/2022 hearing date and weeks after notifying the Applicant that the hearing date had been set for that date. The City’s email on 11/29/2021 did not ask me to confirm the 2/22/2022 date for the hearing; it only mentioned 2/22/2022 as a potential hearing date. I responded on 12/8/2021, rejecting such date by indicating that setting a hearing date at that time was “premature and grossly unfair until I have had the opportunity to have my questions and requests for clarifications properly addressed and fully vetted.” I was not notified that the City wanted to proceed with 2/22/2022 until 2/1/2022, which was weeks after the City had notified the Applicant that that was a set date and more than 10 days after I first started requesting that the City confirm or deny whether that date had been set based on rumors I had heard. (See submitted email strings with Regina Szilak, Jing Yeo, David Martin, and David White.) And, I didn’t really know that 2/22/2022 would be the hearing date until 2/17/2022. (See email strings with David White, and particularly my email to David White, dated 2/18/2022.) The City deceived me and misled me and failed to properly notify me as to the hearing date and gave substantial deference to the Applicant against my interests as the Appellant, and the City has done that throughout this process.

The City Council Report
The City Council Report states in the context of “the impact of loading/unloading and parking on the surrounding neighborhood[, that] [n]o new parking impacts are associated with the current proposal.” (City Council Report, at 7.) That is an absurd finding. The Applicant has said that it intends to hold music and dance performances in the proposed multipurpose room. The multipurpose room will at times serve as an auditorium/theater with a substantial capacity. And the addition of the proposed multipurpose room and the proposed rooftop play court will add substantial space for events that are more intense than are currently held. The Applicant will be able to host larger crowds of visitors, which would require larger numbers of staff to monitor the events. At large events, the Applicant might choose to even hire temporary workers for the event, particularly if valet parking is permitted, which is a very bad idea. The school already commonly hires (or invites) musical bands and other performing arts, and various other services when it Item 6.A
02/22/22
143 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

conducts events. The school will likely hire catering services. All those people have to park somewhere if they drive there. All of these people will impact parking needs that will impact the community and the surrounding neighborhood. There are many other examples that would impact the neighborhood.

The City Council Report describes conditions to “provide concrete direction and guidance to further … dialogue” with the neighborhood. (City Council Report, at 8.) Those conditions are joke:
 A school appointed liaison would not accomplish anything. For decades I have reached out to head administrators at the school and asked them to limit noise and with numerous other problems. They never do anything and only offer excuses.

I’ve complained many times to the police and to Code Enforcement and nothing ever gets solved. A school appointed liaison would work for the Applicant and have no authority that the neighborhood could rely on to represent our interests.  Netting surrounding the upper-level play court would be ugly, as would the 30+ high wall surrounding the play court, and it would exceed the height limit in the zoning code.
 As discussed, above, the Conditions (Condition 17) is self-contradictory and unenforceable and would not ensure that the multipurpose room would not be used as a classroom.
 The landscape screen does not solve privacy concerns; it aggravates privacy concerns. That “solution” is outrageously horrible for residents in the adjacent residential building across from that area of the school and would fail to protect the privacy of such residents. It would only serve to protect the privacy of the school but would do the opposite for those residents. Landscape screens are opaque from a distance but are semi-transparent when someone is up close. Such screens tend to have openings and develop tears (both minor and major) that are completely transparent, and they tend to degrade over time, thus reducing their opacity. Therefore, anyone at the school going up and down the stairwell or anywhere close to the screen could peer and stare into the opposing windows on the east side of the adjacent residential building. And, people inside those residences would not even be able to detect that someone is peeping into their windows, thus creating the constant concern and anxiety that someone (or even a hidden camera) could be watching at any time. Such “solution” is an invasive disruption to the privacy of the people in the adjacent building. The solution is very simple: Don’t allow the rooftop play court to be built. Short of that, don’t allow the stairwell on the western perimeter to be built. Short of that, require the stairwell to be fully enclosed with walls, or at least a wall on the outside side of the stairwell that is at least 7 feet high.
 The Applicant should absolutely not be permitted to have valet service. It would create enormous stress on the neighborhood and only compound the parking and traffic impact on the neighborhood.

Item 6.A
02/22/22
144 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Appeal 20ENT-0275 of 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066 438 San Vicente Blvd.

STATEMENT OF STEVEN SALSBERG, APPELLANT February 22, 2022

The City Council Report when in reviewing my Appeal Statement fails to consider issues brought forth here in this statement and additional issues that I still wish to formulate and present because:

The City refused to answer my zoning code questions after having committed to me that it would answer such questions sufficiently in time for me to provide additional follow up questions that build on such zoning code questions, and sufficiently in advance of scheduling a hearing date. (See above.)
The City also failed to fulfill my information requests, and in a timely manner.

Item 6.A
02/22/22
145 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
146 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 
 













!
"#
$%%& 
%'
$
#()
* 
()
$+$

 
+% $+
,
#
# -.

%' /
)
)
%01 &#+## -
%%
0 &

% 
$  0+% *

$0 - ),.+$+*

$.-
 %
, 
)()-+ % /
')
'
%$2.% *&
#)
' %
- )()-+
,$)%%' &
'()
 .

'
%+%)

'
%
')$ 3%  %

#


'
%$

'
*,#$

+$4+
516
$ 7 

 '! 8#%-%*,$ 
)+
)%+

0%&- 

) %
4


- 

) %
#
+ %
&#+#.
$
#%-%
+
%'0%&- 

) %
4


- 

) %
 #
+ %
.9+


# 6$
0-- 

) %
 4


- 

) %
#
+ %
:
;<=$ '.
$
#%-%$

 
#8&-%: 
#


/4#
>.9+


# 6$
? '
)
-  +#? 0-- 

) %
&)%

#
%-%
#
0 0 

@
3%  &
#()

#8:8
:*
/)
#
') &

0))+

#

#& '.

'()
+)%
0+$)0+ )

%

)0%
-,

#.% A.% ') 
*,#$)
#
+*
#.)%



+,$4+
516 '! 8



#-0%& %%)$ +##
$
#& %%# %%
A+
6$
0-B#

A+.
$ 
+
   &#+#
)
0



#

)
$ 0%&

# 

A+

#
A
)
C()


$
## .
5D$ '%#
&%%
+' ()
0'
# 7)%

:
;<=$ '& %%
 %
#.&#
#
#A
0)%
 

#..
.9+
#  8-0%& %%)$ +##
;
#
=A+
;=6$
0-
B#

:&)%
)+#& %% 

#. + 

#%-%
#
)+#& %%.
 %%' +%
0 0 

.
$ 0 

@
3%  &
#()

#8:8
:*
/)
#
') &

0))+

#

#& '.

'()
+)%
0+$)0+ )

%

)0%
-,

#.% A.% ') 
Item 6.A
02/22/22
147 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 








 







 



   













!"

#




  
#








$
  
#


#


  

 


 
#


$



"%

&'('))')
) $


##

 

$




#







$
 # 
$
 '


$
*+(+)
, 






-$
$.
*)
/




$
  



0
))1+2


3  

0*)-20**-2
0*-2
 


#




'



$

$.
( )
$
 



 



 

 
'!

*+(+)
$


456$/






0*)-20**-2
0*-2

 


 
3 
#

$

#

$
"



 
 



3 




$3















748
#



$
'9
3 


 





0*)-20**-2
0*-2#


$

#

$

 $

#

$



/ (+*+)*
 
 
3 



 


 
##

#:
 ';


#



$
3 
#
 


 






0*)-20**-2
0*-2'<












3 
"

 
3 
 #

 

$




$
$
 
*+*)+)'

$#

$
*+*)+)
$
 
3


$$=+>+)*
$






 3


$$(+*+)*
$
"

,
?



2 #@##

#:
 
#
#






 
$




 


/




A

$0*)-2 


/


$

$



A

$0**-2



/ #
/

A

$0*-2#


$
  

#




 
$


#




#
#

 ##



#

 
B

2

'C


3 


 

 
#





D+=+)*'<


$ 

$
'E
$


 


$



  


#



3  
$

D+=+)*#
 
#

#




#

 '!
%


 %

%


Item 6.A
02/22/22
148 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Savis Zarrabian <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 9:46 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Regina Szilak; Phil Brock
Subject: Appeal 20ENT-0275 (Permit 19ENT-0250 and 20ENT-0066) - 438 San Vicente Blvd.

EXTERNAL
To: Santa Monica City Clerk and the Santa Monica City Council Re: Carlthorp School Appeal
As resident neighbors for over 20 years, we are opposed to the granting of any form of Conditional Use Permits to Carlthorp School, located at 438 San Vicente Blvd. Not only does Carlthorp have insufficient parking for its own staff, but for visitors and parents as well. In fact, every day we observe Carlthorp employees, visitors and parents parking their vehicles in the limited street spaces available for the area residents on San Vicente Boulevard, 4th Street and Georgina.

As a result, the area has become unnecessarily congested, with street parking becoming incredibly difficult for residents to find, many of whom are elderly or disabled.  The problem would be greatly reduced if Carlthorp expanded its parking facilities to support its needs, instead of other operations.

Throughout the greater Los Angeles and Santa Monica area, street parking is restricted by permit near schools. One need not look further than the streets adjacent to Santa Monica High School, Santa Monica College and countless other area schools. However, the streets near and around Carlthorp are open to the public, rendering them available for Carlthorp’s business use. This is highly inappropriate as it is.

Simply said, the streets are already congested and now overcrowded due to Carlthorp’s expansion over the last few years. Carlthorp staff, parents and visitors have had a substantively adverse impact on the quality of life for area residents, who, like us, continually weigh their options when considering a short trip out of fear that there will be no parking available upon their return.

Any further expansion of Carlthorp will only compound this existing problem. Therefore, we strongly oppose the current Conditional Use Permit until the school can provide its own private parking for staff, visitors and parents as needed without over burdening the limited street parking that is available to the area residents.

Thank you.

Ebby & Savis Bakhtiar
Item 6.A
02/22/22
149 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
150 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
151 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
152 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
153 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
154 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
155 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
156 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
157 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
158 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
159 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
160 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
161 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
162 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
163 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
164 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
165 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
166 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
167 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
168 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
169 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
170 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
171 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
172 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
173 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
174 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
175 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
176 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
177 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
178 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
179 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

BASEMENT FLOOR
+97'-3"

BASEMENT FLOOR
+97'-3"
PL

LOWER BASEMENT FLOOR
+89'-8"

LOWER BASEMENT FLOOR
+89'-8"4' - 0"
3' - 8"

BASEMENT LEVEL (ABOVE)
+97'-3"
STAGE
+91'-8"

NEW MULTI-PURPOSE RM
NEW

ELEVATOR

TIERED SEATING

STORAGE

CLASSROOM -

BREAK OUT ROOM

CLASSROOM -

SPANISH

EXISTING CLASSROOM/

MULTI-PURPOSE RM

CLASSROOM -
MATH

READING
P.E. OFFICE
PL

STORAGE

FACILITIES
OFFICE

MAIN POWER

SHUT OFF
ELEV

ROOM SERVER
ROOM
STOR
STOR

RESTROOMS

FACULTY
LOUNGE
STOR
+91'-8"
5' - 0"
HVO

EXISTING READING ROOM

TO BE CONVERTED TO

RESTROOMS

NEW STAIR AND

PARTITION

CORRIDOR
1 A300-B/C
1 A300-B/C
2 A300-B/C
2 A300-B/C
SEE FIRST FLOOR / MAIN LEVEL PLAN ON SHEET A121-B
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
11/18/20 5:34:59 PM
3/32" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A120-B

BASEMENT FLOOR

PLAN - PARCEL

COVERAGE

11.16.20 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
* BASEMENT AREAS SHOWN DO NOT

CONTRIBUTE TO THE PARCEL
COVERAGE CALCULATION.

FLOORING ABOVE THESE BASEMENT
AREAS ARE ALL 3 FEET OR LESS
ABOVE AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE.

SEE SECTION DRAWING A300-B/C FOR

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AND

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LEVELS
Item 6.A
02/22/22
180 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

UP UPDN
DNDN
UP

NEW ENCLOSURE

OF EXISTING

LUNCH SEATING

OUTLINE OF MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM

BELOW GRADE

HANDICAPPED PARKING HANDICAPPED PARKING PLANTER

BIKE RACK
HEDGE

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

RECEPTION/

FRONT OFFICE

BOARDROOM

KITCHEN

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN

CL OF ALLEY

NEW BIKE RACKS
10' - 0"
139' - 11" 35' - 11"
1 A300-B/C
1 A300-B/C
2 A300-B/C 2
A300-B/C

EXISTING

PARKING CLASSROOM

CLASSROOM PORCH

CLASSROOM PORCH EXCLUDED FROM PARCEL COVERAGE PER
SMMC 9.04.100 (F)
NEW

ELEVATOR
NEW

ELEVATOR

CLASSROOM PORCH EXCLUDED

FROM PARCEL COVERAGE PER
SMMC 9.04.100 (F)

EXISTING OPENING AT

END OF UNENCLOSED

CORRIDOR TO REMAIN

OPENING IN NEW

WALL AT END OF

EXISTING

UNENCLOSED

CORRIDOR

OPEN/UNENCLOSED
NEW PARCEL COVERAGE:

NEW ENCLOSED LUNCH SEATING = 843 SF
TOTAL NEW MAIN LEVEL PARCEL COVERAGE = 2,462 SF
NEW ELEVATORS = 278 SF

EXISTING MAIN LEVEL
PARCEL COVERAGE:

PARCEL COVERAGE CALCULATIONS
TOTAL PARCEL AREA FROM SURVEY):

FIRST FLOOR (MAIN LEVEL):

EXISTING PARCEL COVERAGE: 18,536 SF
TOTAL MAIN LEVEL PARCEL COVERAGE:

EXISTING = 18,536 SF
TOTAL (EXISTING + NEW) = 20,998 SF
NEW = 2,462 SF

NEW MAIN LEVEL
PARCEL COVERAGE:

TOTAL MAIN LEVEL
PARCEL COVERAGE:
(NEW + EXISTING)
18,536 SF
(39.98 % OF PARCEL AREA)
46,362.50 SF
2,462 SF
(5.31 % OF PARCEL AREA)
20,998 SF
(45.29 % OF PARCEL AREA)

FOR PURPOSES OF CODE COMPLIANCE
NOTE: THE CLASSROOMS ALONG THE REAR ALLEY ARE

TREATED AS THE UPPER LEVEL FOR PURPOSES OF THIS

CALCULATION OF PARCEL COVERAGE PER THE
DEFINITIONS CONTAINED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE.

SEE FLOOR LEVEL DIAGRAMS FOR MORE INFO.

AREA UNDER STRUCTURE = 1,231 SF
NEW STAIR = 110 SF
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
11/18/20 5:35:02 PM
As indicated CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A121-B

FIRST (MAIN)

FLOOR PLAN -

PARCEL COVERAGE

11.16.20 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
SEE SECTION DRAWING A300-B/C FOR

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AND

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LEVELS
Item 6.A
02/22/22
181 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) +119'-6"
NEW
ADMIN

OFFICES
NEW

ELEVATOR
NEW

ELEVATOR
PL

LIBRARY

CLASSROOM -

COMPUTER LAB

OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE

CLASSROOOM -

ART ROOM

CLASSROOM -

READING
ROOM

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE

NEW STAIR
1 A300-B/C
1 SEE FIRST FLOOR/
A300-B/C

MAIN LEVEL PLAN
ON SHEET A121-B
SCIENCE CLASSROOM - 4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
2ND GRADE

OVERHANG OF ROOFTOP

PLAY COURT ABOVE
2 A300-B/C 2
A300-B/C

CLASSROOM
PORCH

CLASSROOM PORCH EXCLUDED

FROM PARCEL COVERAGE PER
SMMC 9.04.100 (G)

SEE FIRST FLOOR /

MAIN LEVEL PLAN ON
SHEET A121-B

THIS PORTION OF STAIR

EXCLUDED FROM PARCEL
COVERAGE PER SMMC 9.04.100 (G)

OPENING AT END

OF EXISTING

UNENCLOSED

CORRIDOR, SEE

FIRST FLOOR/MAIN

LEVEL PLAN

FOR PURPOSES OF CODE COMPLIANCE

PARCEL COVERAGE CALCULATIONS
TOTAL NEW UPPER LEVEL PARCEL COVERAGE = 1,531 SF
NEW ELEVATORS = 290 SF
NEW ADMIN OFFICES = 840 SF
SECOND FLOOR (UPPER LEVEL):

NEW PARCEL COVERAGE:

EXISTING PARCEL COVERAGE: 16,985 SF
TOTAL UPPER LEVEL PARCEL COVERAGE:

EXISTING = 16,985 SF
TOTAL (EXISTING + NEW) =18,516 SF
NEW = 1,531 SF
90% OF MAIN LEVEL PARCEL COVERAGE

ALLOWED BASED ON MINOR
MODIFICATION INCREASE TO 45.29% OF
TOTAL PARCEL AREA:

TOTAL UPPER LEVEL
PARCEL COVERAGE:
(NEW + EXISTING)
18,516 SF
( < 90 % OF MAIN LEVEL

PARCEL COVERAGE)
20,863.13 SF
x .45
MAIN LEVEL PARCEL 46,362.50 SF

COVERAGE
ALLOWED BY CODE:
18,898.2 SF
x .90
20,998 SF
AREA UNDER STRUCTURE = 401 SF

MAIN LEVEL PARCEL

COVERAGE ALLOWED BY
MINOR MODIFICATION (45.29%)
20,998 SF
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
11/30/20 12:40:02 PM
As indicated CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A122-B

SECOND (UPPER)

FLOOR PLAN -

PARCEL COVERAGE

11.16.20 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
SEE SECTION DRAWING A300-B/C FOR

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AND

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LEVELS
Item 6.A
02/22/22
182 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

NEW ROOFTOP

CHILDREN'S PLAY COURT
(OPEN AIR)
+126'-6"

EXISTING ROOF
PL
1 A300-B/C
1 A300-B/C
2 A300-B/C 2
A300-B/C
NEW

ELEVATOR
NEW

ELEVATOR

NEW STAIR
BELOW
NEW

OFFICES
BELOW
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
11/18/20 5:35:06 PM
3/32" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A123-B

ROOF PLAN -

PARCEL COVERAGE

11.16.20 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
* THIS FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT CONTRIBUTE
TO THE LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION.

SEE SECTION DRAWING A300-B/C FOR

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AND

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LEVELS
Item 6.A
02/22/22
183 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) (E) UPPER LEVEL
+119' - 6"
(E) Top of Roof
+134' - 0"
(E) A.N.G.
+104' - 6"
(E) Basement Floor
Upper
+101' - 6"
(E) First Floor Upper
+110' - 0"
Top of Court
+126' - 6"

NEW ELEVATED

OPEN AIR PLAY COURT

EXISTING PARKING

EXISTING

CLASSROOMS
8' - 0"
30' - 0"

PLAY COURT

STORAGE

INTERSTITIAL/ATTIC SPACE -

NOT OCCUPIABLE

CLASSROOM

MAIN LEVEL

UPPER LEVEL

MAIN LEVEL

LOWER LEVEL
3' - 0"

NEW CLASSROOM

CEILING AND BUILDING

ENVELOPE
7' - 6" 7' - 0" 9' - 6" 5' - 6"3' - 0"
5' - 3"
(E) UPPER LEVEL
+119' - 6"
(E) Top of Roof
+134' - 0"
(E) MAIN LEVEL
+107' - 6"
(E) LOWER LEVEL
+97' - 3"
(E) A.N.G.
+104' - 6"
(E) Basement Floor
Upper
+101' - 6"
(E) First Floor Upper
+110' - 0"
Basement Floor Lower
+89' - 8"
(E) Roof
+130' - 3 1/2"
Top of Court
+126' - 6"

NEW ELEVATED

OPEN AIR PLAYCOURT

EXISTING

CLASSROOM

EXISTING

PARKING

EXISTING

MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM
NEW

ADMINISTRATIVE

ADDITION
NEW

ELEVATOR
NEW

ELEVATOR
BEYOND

NEW ENCLOSURE OF

EXISTING LUNCH SEATING
3' - 9"3' - 10" 7' - 0" 9' - 6" 2' - 6"3' - 0"3' - 0"4' - 3" 7' - 7"

EXISTING STRUCTURE

TO BE REMOVED

EXISTING BUILDING
30' - 0"

UPPER LEVEL

MAIN LEVEL

LIBRARY

UPPER LEVEL

CLASSROOM

MAIN LEVEL

LOWER LEVEL

CLASSROOM
PORCH

CLASSROOM
PORCH

NEW CLASSROOM

CEILING AND

BUILDING ENVELOPE
(THIS PORTION OF

CLASSROOM PORCH

IS ON MAIN/FIRST
LEVEL)
(THIS PORTION

OF CLASSROOM

PORCH IS ON

UPPER/SECOND
LEVEL)

CLASSROOM PORCH

EXCLUDED FROM

PARCEL COVERAGE PER
SMMC 9.04.100 (F)

CLASSROOM PORCH

EXCLUDED FROM

PARCEL COVERAGE PER
SMMC 9.04.100 (F)&(G) OPEN
8' - 0"

INTERSTITIAL/ATTIC SPACE -

NOT OCCUPIABLE
5' - 3"
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
11/30/20 12:39:07 PM
1/8" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A300-B/C

SECTION DIAGRAMS

11.16.20 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
1/8" = 1'-0"
1 E/W SECTION THROUGH ELEVATED COURT LEVEL

DIAGRAM
1/8" = 1'-0"
2 N/S SECTION THROUGH MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM &

ELEVATED COURT - LOT COVERAGE
SEE SECTION DRAWING A300-B/C FOR

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AND

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LEVELS
SMMC 9.52.020.0180 Attic. The area less than 7 feet in height, located above the ceiling of the top story and below the roof that is not usable as habitable or commercial space and is not accessible via a permanent access structure. An attic shall not be considered a story.

Item 6.A
02/22/22
184 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) +97'-3"
PL
+89'-8"
+89'-8"

LOWER LEVEL (ABOVE)
+97'-3"
STAGE
+91'-8"

NEW MULTI-PURPOSE RM
NEW

ELEVATOR

TIERED SEATING

STORAGE

BREAK OUT
ROOM

SPANISH

EXISTING

MULTI-PURPOSE RM
MATH

READING
P.E. OFFICE
PL

STORAGE

FACILITIES
OFFICE

MAIN POWER

SHUT OFF
ELEV

ROOM SERVER
ROOM
STOR
STOR

FACULTY
LOUNGE
STOR
+91'-8"

EXISTING READING ROOM

TO BE CONVERTED TO

RESTROOMS & SHOWERS

NEW STAIR AND

PARTITION

CORRIDOR
5' - 0" 5' - 0"
8 (N) STAFF LOCKERS
LOWER LEVEL (+97' - 3")
+0' - 0"
-7' - 7"
-5' - 7"
1 A300-B/C
1 A300-B/C
SEE FIRST FLOOR / MAIN LEVEL PLAN ON SHEET A121-C
2 A300-B/C
2 A300-B/C

BASEMENT FLOOR
+97'-3"
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
11/18/20 5:34:59 PM
3/32" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A120-C

BASEMENT FLOOR

LEVEL DIAGRAM
(LOWER LEVEL)

11.16.20 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
SEE SECTION DRAWING A300-B/C FOR

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AND

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LEVELS
Item 6.A
02/22/22
185 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) UP UP
DNDN
DN
UP

NEW ENCLOSURE

OF EXISTING

LUNCH SEATING

OUTLINE OF MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM

BELOW GRADE

HANDICAPPED PARKING HANDICAPPED PARKING PLANTER

BIKE RACK
HEDGE

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

RECEPTION/

FRONT OFFICE

BOARDROOM

KITCHEN

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN

CL OF ALLEY

PROPOSED BIKE RACKS
1 A300-B/C
1 A300-B/C

MAIN LEVEL
+0' - 0"
MAIN LEVEL (+107' - 6")
+0' - 0"
+1' - 3"
-6' - 0"

CLASSROOM
2 A300-B/C
2 A300-B/C

EXISTING PARKING

CLASSROOM PORCH
NEW

ELEVATOR
NEW

ELEVATOR

CLASSROOM PORCH
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
11/18/20 5:38:02 PM
3/32" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A121-C

FIRST FLOOR LEVEL

DIAGRAM (MAIN
LEVEL)

11.16.20 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
SEE SECTION DRAWING A300-B/C FOR

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AND

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LEVELS
Item 6.A
02/22/22
186 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) +119'-6"
NEW
ADMIN

OFFICES
PL

LIBRARY

CLASSROOM -

COMPUTER LAB

OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE

CLASSROOOM -

ART ROOM

CLASSROOM -

READING
ROOM

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE

NEW STAIR
UPPER LEVEL (+119' - 6")
+0' - 0"
1 A300-B/C
1 SEE FIRST FLOOR / A300-B/C

MAIN LEVEL PLAN
ON SHEET A121-C
-9' - 6"

SCIENCE CLASSROOM -
4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
2ND GRADE
2 A300-B/C 2
A300-B/C
NEW

ELEVATOR
NEW

SEE FIRST FLOOR / ELEVATOR

MAIN LEVEL PLAN ON
SHEET A121-C
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
11/18/20 5:35:05 PM
3/32" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A122-C

SECOND FLOOR

LEVEL DIAGRAM
(UPPER LEVEL)

11.16.20 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
SEE SECTION DRAWING A300-B/C FOR

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AND

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LEVELS
Item 6.A
02/22/22
187 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 1 A300-B/C
1 A300-B/C

EXISTING ROOF

NEW STAIR
BELOW
NEW

OFFICES
BELOW
PL

ROOFTOP PLAY COURT
126' - 6"
2 A300-B/C 2
A300-B/C
NEW

ELEVATOR
NEW

ELEVATOR
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
11/18/20 5:35:08 PM
3/32" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A123-C

ROOF PLAN LEVEL

DIAGRAM

11.16.20 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
SEE SECTION DRAWING A300-B/C FOR

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AND

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LEVELS
Item 6.A
02/22/22
188 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 



  


 

!
"#$%&' ($"#$%&'$)*$!+,-*. /&0 1234534241 6789 :; <-7 =" 0> ;"& 0! (=" 0>+;"&
0!)$"!
"*-!0,"+'- . ?,7 @-A!+@"#0#0)$"!
"*-!0,"+'- (@-A!+@"#0#0)$"!
"*-!0,"+'- .B >" 0>+CA0
)$"!
"*-!0,"+'- (>" 0>+CA0
)$"!
"*-!0,"+'- . DE FGHEIJ KLGMN OPQ RPS OPQS TEUV GMI GWWEWTGMXV GMI EM GSSGMYEMY TLV XPMRVSVMXV XGZZ TLGT [V LGI PM \]^\_^`]`\a GMI RPS OPQS XPUUETUVMT TP UGNV WQSV TLGT b YVT GZZ PR UO cQVWTEPMW GMW[VSVId ePMVTLVZVWWa b GU HVSO IEWGffPEMTVI [ETL LP[ TLGT XPMRVSVMXV XGZZ [VMTd gPWT PR GZZa b GU IEWGffPEMTVI TLGT OPQ ZVRT UV [ETL IPQhT GW TP [LVTLVS TLV iETO [PQZI LPMPS TLV SVcQVWT TLGT b LGHV SVfVGTVIZO UGIV PHVS UPSV TLGM TLV fGWT WEj UPMTLW k GMI [LEXL OPQ TPZI UV [GW HVSO SVGWPMGhZV [LVM [V WfPNV PM lXTPhVS m k TLGT b WLPQZI LGHV GT ZVGWT G RQZZ UPMTL nGMI UPSV ER b MVVI ETo TP fSVfGSV UO WQffZVUVMTGZ WTGTVUVMT RPS UO GffVGZa GRTVS YVTTEMY UO cQVWTEPMW GMW[VSVI GMI XZGSEREVI SVYGSIEMY TLV pPMEMY XPIV GMI TLGT b [PQZI LGHV qEMGrW GMI sTVfLGMEVrW RQSTLVS fSPUfT XPPfVSGTEPM [LEZV brU fSVfGSEMY TLV WQffZVUVMT TP UO GffVGZa WP TLGT b XPQZI WQhUET UO WQffZVUVMTGZ WTGTVUVMT EM GIHGMXV PR sTGRR hVYEMMEMY TP fSVfGSV ETW sTGRR tVfPSTd gO SVcQVWT EW fGSTEXQZGSZO SVGWPMGhZV hVXGQWV b LGHV hVVM GTTVUfTEMY TP PhTGEM GMW[VSW TP MQUVSPQW pPMEMY cQVWTEPMW WEMXV ZGWT uGMQGSOa [ETL PMZO EMTVSUETTVMT GMI ZEUETVI XPPfVSGTEPM RSPU sTGRRa [LEZV b LGHV [GWTVI WQhWTGMTEGZ TEUVa VMVSYO GMI RPXQW XPSSVWfPMIEMY [ETL MQUVSPQW VUGEZW GMI HPEXVUGEZW SVcQVWTEMY SVWfPMWVW GMI XPPfVSGTEPM TLGT LGHV YPMV QMGMW[VSVI RPS UQZTEfZV UPMTLW GT G TEUVd sTGRR EYMPSEMY UO MQUVSPQW fZVGWa RPS XPPfVSGTEPM GMI TP PhTGEM GMW[VSW TP UO cQVWTEPMWa LGW QMRGESZO XGQWVI UV TP WQRRVS TLSPQYL UQXL GMjEVTO GMI [GWTV G ZPT PR UO TEUVd b GU GZWP fGSTEXQZGSZO IEWGffPEMTVI hVXGQWV TLV lXTPhVS \_ XPMRVSVMXV XGZZ IVUPMWTSGTVI G RQSTLVS XPUfVZZEMY VjGUfZV GW TP LP[ TLV GffVGZ fSPXVWW LGW hVVM QMRGES GMI GW TP sTGRRvW PhHEPQW GMI XZVGS hEGW EM RGHPS PR TLV wffZEXGMT GMI ETW fSPfPWGZ GMI GYGEMWT UO EMTVSVWTW GMI UO GffVGZa GW b GZWP TPZI OPQ [LVM [V WfPNV PM lXTPhVS md FQSEMY TLV lXTPhVS \_ XPMRVSVMXV XGZZa uEMY WGEI TLGT WLV LGW TPZI UV WVHVSGZ TEUVW TLGT TLVOvHV SVHEV[VI TLV fZGMW GMI TLGT TLV fZGMW XPUfZO [ETL TLV XPIVd xf QMTEZ OPQ EMTVSHVMVI nTLGMN OPQo GRTVS [V WfPNV PM lXTPhVS ma WP TLGT b XGM LPfVRQZZO MP[ YVT UO cQVWTEPMW GMW[VSVIa TLGT LGW hVVM sTGRRvW fPWETEPM [LVM TLVO UPSV TLGM PMXV GTTVUfTVI TP XSGU IP[M G LVGSEMY IGTV [ETLPQT GRRPSIEMY UV XZVGSa SPhQWTa GMI fSPfVS GMW[VSW TP UO cQVWTEPMWd KLQWa sTGRR fSVyQIYVI UO fPWETEPM [ETLPQT fVSUETTEMY UV TLV PffPSTQMETO k [ETL fSPfVS QMIVSWTGMIEMY PR TLV XPIV GMI LP[ ET WLPQZI hV GffZEVI k TP WLP[ TLVU LP[ TLV fZGMW UEYLT hV HEPZGTEMY TLV XPIVd wMIa TLVO IP MPT MVXVWWGSEZO WVV [LGT b WVV EM TLV fZGMWa EM TLV XPIV [ETL SVWfVXT TP TLV fZGMWa PS SVYGSIEMY TLV fZGMW GMI TLV XPIV [ETL SVWfVXT TP TLV fSPfVSTO GMI TLV WTSQXTQSV GW ET GXTQGZZO fLOWEXGZZO EWd wW WQXLa uEMYvW fPWETEPM LGW hVVMa GMI EWa GMI GW WLV GZWP VjfSVWWVI IQSEMY TLV lXTPhVS \_ XPMRVSVMXV XGZZa TLGT b GU RSVV TP GSYQV TP TLV iETO iPQMXEZ gVUhVSW nEM [SETEMY GMI^PS PSGZZOo TLGT sTGRRvW IVTVSUEMGTEPM TLGT TLV fZGMW XPUfZO [ETL TLV XPIV EW EMXPSSVXTd KLGT EW GM GhWQSIa QMRGESa GMI hEGWVI fPWETEPM RPS sTGRR TP TGNVd iETO iPQMXEZ gVUhVSW VMTSQWT GMI SVZO QfPM sTGRR TP hV VjfVSTW EM SVHEV[EMY fSPyVXT fZGMW GMI GffZOEMY TLV XPIV GMI TLV iPQMXEZ gVUhVSW IP MPT YVMVSGZZO LGHV TLV TEUVa TLV RPXQWa PS TLV VjfVSTEWV TP GXXVfT UO [PSI PM TVXLMEXGZ EWWQVW PHVS sTGRRvWd uEMYvW hEGWVI GffSPGXL GMI fPWETEPM SVMIVSW UV IVRVGTVI hVRPSV b hVYEMa SVYGSIZVWW GW TP [LVTLVS [ETL IEZEYVMT VRRPST b UEYLT EIVMTERO WPUVTLEMY TLGT sTGRR UEYLT LGHV UEWWVI TLGT [PQZI GMI WLPQZI XLGMYV TLV SVWQZTd wMIa TLV RGXT TLGT WPUV PR TLVWV EWWQVW UEYLT GZZP[ sTGRR TP LGHV VZVUVMTW PR IEWXSVTEPMa UO XPMXVSMW TLGT bvHV hVVM TSVGTVI QMRGESZO GMI TLGT sTGRR EW hEGWVI EM RGHPS PR TLV wffZEXGMT GMI GYGEMWT UO EMTVSVWT GSV Item 6.A 02/22/22
189 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 




















!




"

!#

$



# 






%%
&

!



!






%$
%





%


"
'%
%
$
%










%

%$
%





%


"
%


%





%




"




"


"

!%

%



%




%%
%

%


"





%


%%


"

%
!

%
"


!
%





%%
"

%
!







 





"


&






%






%




!
%$
%





%


"
'%
%

()
%


%
&*
%



%

%





%



"



%

$
&

*

 


"

+
$




"












%$

"
'%
%


 $








$





$







%$
%


"
'%
%
 %













%

%$
%


"
%


%




%
!
,
-
%







$






!"

$







 



"

'%%


%$
%

% 

"


%





"




%%

(&

%








%





 



%






&
.



%



%
#%








!
,

&


%

%

$

$









$
!
%








$


&

 



!
%


&

%


"
*






%
"




+
$


"
'%
%







$








/


%








"
!
%
%





"
'%
%







!





%%%


%

0
%


/


%


1 
 


0
%
!



%

!









%
%%%


%



%
%!
"


 
%



%

"

%
&
%%
%


2





-



%


%





$


"
'%
%

%


%



!
%
%





"


$


 
%
%



)

%









"
$%
!
%
&
$%





0 


%



%

$%




3 4 (%






",


&






%



&








'%
(%,


&


%

5









$%
#%
%
&
$%
!










.



%

 





%


$%







(


*%,







"
'%
%






"







!%%











"
.%

&
$







"

$




%



&





"
'%
%




"

%

"
 

%



&*


%









"
%




"



&
$



%



 

"

$






$

$









%%












$"








%%


%

!
%
"


"





%%

6 
% 

%!
789:7;<:=8>?

Item 6.A
02/22/22
190 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 



  


 

!
"#$%&' ($"#$%&'$)*$!+,-*. /0 123432521 6789 :; <-7 =" >0 ;"& >! (=" >0+;"&
>!)$"!
"*-!>,"+'- . ?@ ABC@DE F BG HI@JJ CKLM NLOHILBIKD DOK IP Q@RSTH LKNOHBJ IP BRHUKL GM VOKHI@PRH BRD IP NOJN@JJ GM LKVOKHIH NPL WJBL@N@WBI@PRHX YZ@JK Q@RS D@D LK[JM IP GM \]^_`^_]_\ KGB@Ja HZK PRJM [BLI@BJJM BRHUKLKD PRJM PRK PN GM VOKHI@PRHa UZ@WZ D@D RPI BDD BRMIZ@RS IP UZBI F BJLKBDM bRKU PL WJBL@NM UZBI F BHbKD ZKL IP WJBL@NMX cNIKL BR KRPLGPOH BGPORI PN I@GK UBHIKD H@RWK IZK G@DDJK PN dBMa KGB@J@RS Q@RS BRD JKBC@RS ZKL CP@WKGB@JHa F BG HI@JJ UB@I@RS IP LKWK@CK BRHUKLH IP GM VOKHI@PRH BRD LKVOKHIH NPL WJBL@N@WBI@PRH IZBI F KGB@JKD IP ZKL PR e^\_^_]_\a f^_g^_]_\a \]^_`^_]_\a BRD RPU BSB@R IPDBMX F BJHP ZBCK BDD@I@PRBJ WLOW@BJ VOKHI@PRH IZBI F Kh[KWI IP [PHK IZBI U@JJ iO@JD PR IZK BRHUKLH IZBI FTCK iKKR HKKb@RS H@RWK GM e^\_^_]_\ BRD f^_g^_]_\ KGB@JHX dKBRUZ@JKa IZK jJBRR@RS A@C@H@PR @H HI@JJ ILM@RS IP WLBG DPUR B ZKBL@RS DBIK UZ@JK WPRI@RO@RS IP RPI BRHUKL GM VOKHI@PRHX kZK [LPWKHH @H [BIKRIJM ORNB@LX cRDa lm nopqra Q@RS @H HI@JJ LKNOH@RS IP BRHUKL GM VOKHI@PRH BRD IP NOJN@JJ GM WJBL@N@WBI@PR LKVOKHIHX sPO IPJD GK IZBI F ZBCK B L@SZI IP ZBCK GM VOKHI@PRH BRHUKLKDX YZKR WBR F BWIOBJJM Kh[KWI IZBI IP ZB[[KRt F UPOJD B[[LKW@BIK @I @N MPO UPOJD LKVO@LK IZBI u\v IZK wPR@RS cDG@R@HILBIPL NOJJM BRD LPiOHIJM BRHUKL GM VOKHI@PRH BRD [LPC@DK GM LKVOKHIKD WJBL@N@WBI@PRH LKSBLD@RS IZK wPR@RS xPDK BRD IZK c[[J@WBRITH [LP[PHKD [LPyKWIz BRD u_v IZK jJBRR@RS A@C@H@PR RPI WPRIKG[JBIK B ZKBL@RS DBIK ORI@J F ZBCK NOJJM LKWK@CKD IZK BRHUKLH BRD WJBL@N@WBI@PRH IZBI F ZBCK iKKR LKVOKHI@RS BRD Kh[KWI IP LKVOKHIX sPO BJHP IPJD GK IZBI GM ZBC@RS B GPRIZ IP [LK[BLK GM B[[KBJ HO[[JKGKRI BNIKL FTCK ZBD GM VOKHI@PRH BRHUKLKD @H B LKBHPRBiJK LKVOKHIX Y@JJ MPO [JKBHK [LKCKRI IZK jJBRR@RS A@C@H@PR NLPG HKII@RS B ZKBL@RS DBIK UZ@JK BJJPU@RS Q@RS IP NL@IIKL BUBM IZK WBJKRDBL iM DKJBM@RS NOJN@JJGKRI PN GM VOKHI@PRH BRD WJBL@N@WBI@PR LKVOKHIHt {KSBLDHa |IKCKR |BJHiKLS }\]~}`e~f\g Item 6.A
02/22/22
191 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 











!"!#$%&'!()*&$%&'!()&+,&#-./,0 1/#23422453522565781 9/6:$";<1$( ;#*:$";<-1$( ;#+&$# $,/#;.$-)/"0 =>?@A>BC DE@FGHIJK LMNANFL@OPQNRS TUVWX?@A>BY@RZF[?@A>BKY@RZF\P@FM@]IF>^@KSIA_ `abcXDEJRPB@HCd^MIQNReCfgfhijkklY mVXLMNANFL@OPQNRS[P@OPQNRSP\]PFK^I]_ noXpIEFp@O>O>[pIEFKp@O>O>\P@FM@]IF>^@KSIA_qr@R]NFsJZNRRNt[r@R]NFKsJZNRRNt\P@FM@]IF>^@KSIA_ `uvwaocXxyjfgyzD{gfei@FBh|yzD{gfig@FBfgyzD{gg}}~kL@F€>^NFMNOABK  =>LMNANF ‚ƒANM@OGNBMIp>FS@QIJMHIJR„JNPZIFP@FB
NME>FGMENQNPM
@HMI@BBRNPPHIJR^IF^NRFP>P†IRJPMIE@AN@ ]NNZFS >MEHIJCp>FSCLMN‡E@F>NCs>F@@FB]NPIME@M
N^@F@OOEN@RHIJR„JNPZIFPC]@GNPJRN
NJFBNRPM@FB @FB@RN@QONMI‡RIA>BNHIJ
>ME^ON@R@FP
NRPKˆN
>OOQN>FMIJ^E
>MEHIJN@ROHFN‰M
NNGMIP^ENBJONMEN ]NNZFSK 
?@A>B TUVWXLMNANFL@OPQNRS[P@OPQNRSP\]PFK^I]_ `abcXˆNBFNPB@HCd^MIQNR}Cfgfh}jg|lY mVX?@A>BY@RZF[?@A>BKY@RZF\P@FM@]IF>^@KSIA_ noXpIEFp@O>O>[pIEFKp@O>O>\P@FM@]IF>^@KSIA_qr@R]NFsJZNRRNt[r@R]NFKsJZNRRNt\P@FM@]IF>^@KSIA_ `uvwaocXxNjfgyzD{gfei@FBh|yzD{gfig@FBfgyzD{gg}}~kL@F€>^NFMNOABK  
=NOOIYRKY@RZFj 
DE@FGHIJANRH]J^E†IRP‡N@G>FS
>ME]NIFMEN‡EIFNHNPMNRB@H@FB†IRHIJR@PP>PM@F^N>FME>P ]@ŠNRK  ?JR>FSMEN^@OOC‚N‰‡O@>FNBMIHIJME@M‚E@ANQNNF@ŠN]‡ZFSMIIQM@>F^O@R>‹^@ZIF@FB@FP NRPMI]H „JNPZIFPRNS@RB>FSMENtIF>FS^IBNP>F^Np@FJ@RH@FBME@M]HN]@>OP@FB‡EIFN^@OOPRNS@RB>FSPJ^E RN„JNPMP†IR@FP NRP@FB^O@R>‹^@ZIFPE@ANQNNF‡R>]@R>OH>SFIRNBIANRMEN‡@PM‹AN]IFMEPC@OOMEN E>ONxNS>F@Lt>O@GŒs>F@C
>MEp>FSŽPPJ‡‡IRMCE@PMR>NBMI^R@]BI
FJ‡IF]N@EN@R>FSB@MN
E>ON ON@A>FS]NO@RSNOH>FMENB@RG@PMI]HtIF>FS^IBN„JNPZIFPK‚E@ANMEJPJF†@>ROHPJNRNBMERIJSE ]J^E@F‰>NMH@FB @PMNB@OIMI†Z]NK‚N‰‡O@>FNBMIHIJME@MŒh‚E@B]@BNPI]N‡RISRNPPBJR>FSM I PN‡@R@MN‡EIFN^@OOP>F‡R>O
>MEp>FSqŒfQJMC
ENF‚†IOOI
NBJ‡
>ME@FN]@>OIFi‘hf‘fgfhC@PG>FS @BB>ZIF@O„JNPZIFP@FB†IRPI]N^O@R>‹^@ZIFCPEN†@>ONBMI†IOOI MERIJSE@’NRPENP@>BME@MPEN
IJOB Item 6.A
02/22/22
192 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))  



 


 

 



  






 

 







! "

 




 !
#



 !
 $%&' 
(!



"

 



#






$%'


)


*
+  !!

 
(!







!!



,



!!





-



"

 

#.




 !
  

  






,

. 

/!


*

 


!01

!!
  2
#34

3
! 4
!


5

6
2

+

!!





"

 
"

 

5

6
 
 

 
#

 

+ 

( !!



.%*
7
+ 



$




!

/
"




!! .' /! 






/! 




!
  








!!





+
. 
!!







8



#


"

 


 8



 











-. 
!!

















8


  "

 !

 
#

 

"
 

-



 






 

 !!


!!.9 

 



!
!

 


!




+


*

:
,+ 





:
,

!


.;
 

 








 

 "

 

"

 


#

  < 



 

  !

!











. 

!!






"

 
%

+!





=
>






!

/

 '


0

 


 

%



'

!! !!




 !!?"

 

#

-






 )
+ :
!
+  
!
!


!



+!!

 !!


 !!



 


 !!





:
,




!!

:
,@!

. 
9 






8



 !




!


 
+



8

 



 
 "-

 

0. 
7 "



(




!
!




"

  !


#


"
.7

 
!




(




 !
!



#

"

 
 
  



 "

 

 ?


















+

!! !!

:
,








 

:
,



 !!

:
,@!

.7




+ !


*





#













A %




'! 



# 



. 
9












(


.

@  :
:
 &0&BC0DE Item 6.A
02/22/22
193 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 







  




!"#$%$&$
'(")()*+,'-.
/#$ $#0&$
0&$
 12330
0 330
0 
 45
$6 $

$75
$6 $

$7
  89:2
;$,)(<=
>()?-
*@<=
>()-(
)(<=
>((AAB'+#C
$$D0

E
F$G

!$
0"GH I$J$I
$$KI$L
!& GL
00F5
$$
0$00I
$
0! $KL$$F 

6$M 0FI
M# #$ $#0&$
0&$
 




!"#$%$&$
'(")()*B,-?,-'.
/







  12330
0 330
0 
 45
$6 $

$75
$6 $

$7
  89:2
;$,)(<=
>()?-
*@<=
>()-(
)(<=
>((AAB'+#C
$$D0


N


,

F! I
$O&F$5 0
L$%$F

!& *('(
**P
Q
M
"
I! R
$00 
0&0$
$J$
!"G 0
%$FL
!$

#$ $#0&$
 '*(>'@->?*+A








  




!"#$%$&$
'(")()*A,'A.
/#$ $#0&$
0&$
 12330
0 330
0 
 45
$6 $

$75
$6 $

$7
  89:2
;$,)(<=
>()?-
*@<=
>()-(
)(<=
>((AAB'+#C
$$D0

N$00

#0&$
" GH%%!%$F! 

 !
$
GH I$J$I
$$KI$L
!%0$$0$$ FLL$! H
$I
$$I
00$
0!$KL$$FGH0F
I
L

%$F
L
! 
%$I 00! 

$
!
$



6$M 0FI
M# #$ $#0&$
0&$
 




!"#$%$&$
'(")()*),)@,B-.

Item 6.A
02/22/22
194 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))  


 




 









!"#$%&'($#)*
+,%&'($#*$
#$%&'($$--./01
23
34
  

5




6 
7
389:3
;
33
3:

9

 
4
<3
=3
1>
?
3@
37@:AA
33
9AA3
31
B9B:


73C33

9

3
33


:
D

B 3:3@
E
AA
F3
9

3 
G
3


33D

H 


G

3

:D

B 3:3 A
3 3I:39C3
C
3A
A3

9
3J3

9A
3A
39:AA
33
 
7

3 9:C3:3GE
AA
F3
9F
G73
:3
:
3?3 

K
 3 
7L

3A
3
3M@7L33
3 C3
3E:


NA
3A
39 :AA
33
9AA3
83
7L3
3
3 9>

 3I:3


:3@
G 
:
7L


333A
A
3A
3
A3


E
K

13A
3 =3
3

 


I:3


:3@:

?3
9
37A
3A
39
:AA
33
 
5@33
G9
3I:33C33

9

3 

3@
3K
G@
L:AA
G
3 
 @
:A
33

 3@
3
3
3

3
9
3 
?9>

 3I:3

7 3::

E

9:O3
3 
::
F39
@3 
E
3

;
33A
A
93(
C
:3
E
3(7L

3:A
3
3
A3



A
3A

3:AA
33
9AA3
G73
3 C3 
=3
G 133
1
C3
 /+$(/,*()+0- 
Item 6.A
02/22/22
195 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 



  


 

!
"#$%&' ($"#$%&'$)*$!+,-*. /-! 0121321310 4567 8/ 9-5 :" ;:+<=; )$"!
"*-!;,"+'- (:" ;:+<=;
)$"!
"*-!;,"+'- . >? @AB CD?EFG HDIJK LMN OFAL PNQD RMA LMNA SDMJF QITT MJ UUVUWVXWXU IJY RMA ZDIE [ I\\NPF ZI\ LMNA RMTTMZ?J] NS IJY I\K?J] ^?J] _FM IJYVMA `IO?Y @IAE?J EM IJ\ZFA PL aNF\E?MJ\ IJY SAMSFATL AF\SMJY EM PL AFaNF\E\ RMA QTIA?R?QIE?MJ\B CD?TF ^?J] Y?Y AFSTL EM PL UWVXbVXWXU FPI?Tc \DF MJTL SIAE?ITTL IJY MSIaNFTL IJ\ZFAFY MJTL MJF MR PL aNF\E?MJ\c ZD?QD [ QANQ?ITTL JFFY IJ\ZFAFY dFRMAF [ QIJ PMOF RMAZIAY Z?ED PL IYY?E?MJIT aNF\E?MJ\ IJY ZD?QD Y?Y JME IYY IJLED?J] EM ZDIE [ ITAFIYL KJFZ MA QTIA?RL ZDIE [ I\KFY DFA EM QTIA?RLB `F\S?EF `IO?Y @IAE?J DIO?J] QMPP?EEFY EM PF EDIE EDF e?EL ZMNTY IJ\ZFA ITT MR PL aNF\E?MJ\c ^?J] \?PSTL AFRN\F\ EM IJ\ZFA PL aNF\E?MJ\ f FOFJ aNF\E?MJ\ EDIE PFFE EDF NJAFI\MJIdTL JIAAMZ SAMR?TF MR ELSF\ MR aNF\E?MJ\ EDIE \DF \IL\ \DFg\ Z?TT?J] EM IJ\ZFAB hJ ?E\ MZJc [ ZMNTY JME P?JY ^?J] YFTIL?J] IJ\ZFA?J] PL aNF\E?MJ\ i?R \DF ZMNTY IE TFI\E ISSA?\F PF EDIE \DF ?\ YFTILFYjB >MZFOFAc EDF kTIJJ?J] `?O?\?MJ \?PNTEIJFMN\TL DI\ dFFJ IEEFPSE?J] EM QAIP YMZJ I DFIA?J] YIEFc ZD?QD QMPd?JFY Z?ED ^?J]g\ AFRN\IT EM IJ\ZFA PL aNF\E?MJ\c \Nd\EIJE?ITTL SAFOFJE\ PF RAMP SNEE?J] RMAZIAY PL ISSFITB lREFA IJ FJMAPMN\ IPMNJE MR E?PF ZI\EFY \?JQF EDF P?YYTF MR @ILc FPI?T?J] ^?J] IJY TFIO?J] DFA OM?QFPI?T\c [ IP \E?TT ZI?E?J] EM AFQF?OF IJ\ZFA\ EM PL aNF\E?MJ\ IJY AFaNF\E\ RMA QTIA?R?QIE?MJ\ EDIE [ FPI?TFY EM DFA MJ mVUXVXWXUc nVXoVXWXUc UWVXbVXWXUc IJY JMZ I]I?J MJ UXVpVXWXUc IJY [ IT\M AFIQDFY MNE EM `IO?Y @IAE?J MJ `FQFPdFA p IJY b dL FPI?T IJY SDMJF EM JM IOI?TB [ IT\M DIOF IYY?E?MJIT QANQ?IT aNF\E?MJ\ EDIE [ FqSFQE EM SM\F EDIE Z?TT dN?TY MJ EDF IJ\ZFA\ EDIE [rOF dFFJ \FFK?J] RMA \FOFAIT PMJED\B @FIJZD?TFc EDF kTIJJ?J] `?O?\?MJ ?\ \E?TT EAL?J] EM QAIP YMZJ I DFIA?J] YIEF ZD?TF QMJE?JN?J] EM JME IJ\ZFA PL aNF\E?MJ\B [rOF AFIQDFY MNE EM ^?J] IJY MEDFA\ Z?ED \FOFAIT YMsFJ FPI?T\ IJY SDMJF QITT\ ITPM\E ITZIL\ Z?EDMNE AFQF?O?J] I AF\SMJ\Fc IEEFPSE?J] EM ]FE PL aNF\E?MJ\ IJ\ZFAFYc IJY EDN\ NJAFI\MJIdTL QM\E?J] PF FJMAPMN\ IPMNJE\ MR E?PFB tMA ITT MR EDF\F AFI\MJ\ IJY PNQD PMAFc EDF SAMQF\\ ?\ SIEFJETL NJRI?AB [ ZMNTY ISSAFQ?IEF ?E ?R LMN ZMNTY AFaN?AF EDIE iUj EDF uMJ?J] lYP?J?\EAIEMA RNTTL IJY AMdN\ETL IJ\ZFA PL aNF\E?MJ\ IJY SAMO?YF PL AFaNF\EFY QTIA?R?QIE?MJ\ AF]IAY?J] EDF uMJ?J] eMYF IJY EDF lSST?QIJEr\ SAMSM\FY SAMvFQEw IJY iXj EDF kTIJJ?J] `?O?\?MJ JME QMJEFPSTIEF I DFIA?J] YIEF NJE?T [ DIOF RNTTL AFQF?OFY EDF IJ\ZFA\ IJY QTIA?R?QIE?MJ\ EDIE [ DIOF dFFJ AFaNF\E?J] IJY FqSFQE EM AFaNF\EB [ Z?TT RMTTMZ NS ED?\ FPI?T Z?ED I QITT EM LMNB xF]IAY\c yEFOFJ yIT\dFA] zUW{zbm{nUpo Item 6.A
02/22/22
196 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))  

 





 

! "#$% &'()(*&+,-.(/01-+,-.(/0-23-*45637 86*9:;:9<99=9>=9?8 @6>A+)BCDEB'(1C+)BC4FEB'(2-+*'+36*B5+406)7 GHIJKLMHNOP QRISRTUVQGSSTTSWXSY QMZ[\]^_`OJ]a_bMc^J]^_JZddHdNZ[bOZ[eZNNO[NH^[N^NMHdaZNNOJK fZ`HeIZJNH[b^[NZbNOeaO^[LOe[OdeZ]gZdNhOO\iM^_JdZcNOJRgZdNb^[NZbNOe]^_ij_Nd^cZJ[^NMH[k MZdbMZ[kOeZ[eRMOZJeNMZNfZ`HeIZJNH[O`O[Z[[^_[bOeZkZH[ZcNOJMOZ[eRdl^\OgZdNLOe[OdeZ] NMZNNMO]hOJOk^H[kZMOZehHNMNMOMOZJH[k^[mnmmnmommKRN^geMHaNMZNRdNHggMZ`O[^NJObOH`Oe Z[dhOJdN^NMOp_OdNH^[dNMZNRq`OjOO[dOO\H[kZ[dhOJdN^c^JNMOlZdNOHkMNa^[NMdZ[eNMZNHNHd[^NcZHJ ^JJOZgHdNHbrO`O[hOJORN^MZ`OJObOH`Oed_bMZ[dhOJdgZdNhOO\rc^JNMOsgZ[[H[kfOlZJNaO[NN^ lJ^bOOehHNMNMOZllOZgMOZJH[k^[mnmmnmommKQMOsgZ[[H[kfOlZJNaO[NbgOZJg]dZ[ejZkkOeaOKQMZNHd ^_NJZkO^_dZ[ebgOZJg]Z[_[cZHJlJ^bOddK t[eRdNHggMZ`Oc^gg^h_lp_OdNH^[dRqgg[OOeN^Zd\Kt[eNMO[ZcNOJJObOH`H[kZ[dhOJdN^NMOc^gg^h_l p_OdNH^[diRqgg[OOeN^eJZcNa]d_llgOaO[NN^a]ZllOZgd_ccHbHO[Ng]H[Ze`Z[bOc^JTNZccN^H[bg_eOa] d_llgOaO[NH[NMOHJTNZccuOl^JNK QMOsgZ[[H[kfOlZJNaO[NZgd^cZHgOeN^[^NHc]aOH[ZNHaOg]aZ[[OJNMZNd_bMMOZJH[keZNOMZejOO[dONK G^hO`OJiHNHdO`HeO[NNMZNNMOsgZ[[H[kfOlZJNaO[N[^NHcHOeNMOtllgHbZ[NhOO\djOc^JONMOXHN]N^geaO NMZNd_bMeZNOMZejOO[dONiZ[eRhZd^[g][^NHcHOeH[JOdl^[dON^a]JOZbMH[k^_NN^]^_KQMOJOZJO dOJH^_dcZHJ[OddZ[ee_OlJ^bOddb^[bOJ[dMOJOK sgOZdOH[NOJ`O[OKt[eilgOZdONOggaON^hMZNOvNO[NRbZ[JOg]^[]^_JH[NOJ`O[NH^[KRNHdZjd^g_NOg][^N JOZgHdNHbc^JNMOMOZJH[kN^NZ\OlgZbO^[mnmmnmommZ[eRdNHggMZ`O[^NJObOH`OeNMOZ[dhOJdN^a] p_OdNH^[dK RZaZgd^[^hdOJH^_dg]b^[dHeOJH[kc^JaZgg]cHgH[kZb^algZH[NZkZH[dNwH[kxO^Z[eZgd^fZ`HeIZJNH[ hHNMNMOXHN]qdG_aZ[uOd^_JbOdeOlZJNaO[NKRZa[^hH[b^[NZbNhHNMy^JHzO[NgOdK sgOZdOMOglaOK QRISRTUVQGSSTTSWXSY QMZ[\]^_c^J]^_JZNNO[NH^[N^NMHdaZNNOJKRhHggc^gg^h_lNMHdOaZHghHNMZbZggN^]^_K uOkZJedi TNO`O[TZgdjOJk {|o}{~}€|‚ Item 6.A
02/22/22
197 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 



 

 






! "
# #$##%&$'() *

+
,-+ 



+



+
,-+ 



+

 ./01
!,&23)435!264447849&#$472:$#;%

<'472:$#%$

#$472:$$==>?@

A+
 B

 
CDEFGHIDJKL MNEONPQRMCOOPPOSTOU MIVWXYZ[\KFY][^I_ZFYZ[FV``D`JVW^KVWaVJJKWJDZWJZJID`]VJJKFG bDWcdKZ^ZWJDW[K`JZFK_[`KJZVW`eKF]Yf[K`JDZW`GPIKK]VDgKa]KZWM[K`aVYhijihkhhGCZeK\KFl IKFmVW`eKF`lneID^I`IKZWgYoVFJDVggYoFZ\DaKaJZV^Z[ogKZ_]Yf[K`JDZW`leKFK\Vc[KlZoVf[Kl DW^Z]ogKJKlVWaVg`ZVp`Zg[JKgYWZJZWoZDWJGqVFJD^[gVFgYZ[JFVcKZ[`D`JIK_V^JJIVJ`IK^IVFV^JKFDrKaIKF \Vc[KVWaDWVooZ`DJKFK`oZW`K`JZVgD]DJKaoZFJDZWZ_]Yf[K`JDZW`V`IV\DWcmJIZFZ[cIgYVW`eKFKan]Y f[K`JDZW`G sWal`IK[`Ka`[^IWZW`KW`D^Vg^IVFV^JKFDrVJDZWV`t[`JD_D^VJDZW_ZFm]Z\uDWcv_ZFeVFaeDJIVTDJY TZ[W^DgIKVFDWcZWRKpF[VFYhhlhkhhGnwWgK``VWa[WJDg]Yf[K`JDZW`uVWaJIK_ZggZe[of[K`JDZW`JIVJ NeDggWKKaJZV`XvIV\KpKKW_[ggYl^gKVFgYl`oK^D_D^VggYlVWa[WKf[D\Z^VggYVW`eKFKaV`NIV\KpKKW FKoKVJKagYV`XDWc_ZF`DW^K]ZFKJIVW`DxVWaKDcIJ]ZWJI`VcZyDJeZ[gapK[W_VDFJZK\KW`^IKa[gKV IKVFDWcGsWalNzgg`JDggWKKaVaaDJDZWVgJD]KV_JKF]Yf[K`JDZW`IV\KpKKWFK`Zg\KaJZoFKoVFK]Y `[oogK]KWJJZ]YVooKVglpV`KaZWJIKVW`eKF`JIVJNcKJG Q\KFJIKoV`JKDcIJ]ZWJI`lJIKqgVWWDWc{KoVFJ]KWJIV`Z[JFVcKZ[`gYVWa[W_VDFgYVJJK]oJKaJZ^FV] aZeWVIKVFDWcaVJKeIDgK`D][gJVWKZ[`gYbDWcIV`pKKWV\ZDaDWcVW`eKFDWc]Yf[K`JDZW`GqVFJD^[gVFgY Z[JFVcKZ[`gY[W_VDFlWZeJIVJJIKqgVWWDWc{KoVFJ]KWJV^J[VggYaDa^FV]aZeWVIKVFDWcaVJK[oZW]K eDJIZ[J]Yf[K`JDZW`IV\DWcpKKWVW`eKFKalJIKY_VDgKaJZJKgg]KJIVJVIKVFDWcaVJKIVapKKW`KJ[WJDg KgK\KWaVY`V_JKFNpKcVW]VXDWcDWf[DFDK`pK^V[`KNIVaIKVFaF[]ZF`VpZ[JVaVJKIV\DWcpKKW`KJG sWaloFZpVpgYJIKYIVa`KJ`[^IaVJKVWaWZJD_DKaJIKsoogD^VWJK\KWpK_ZFKN]VaK]YDWf[DFDK`G qgKV`KDWJKF\KWKVWaFKf[DFKJIVJJIKIKVFDWcaVJKpKoZ`JoZWKaVWaogKV`KFKf[DFKJIVJujvJIK|ZWDWc sa]DWD`JFVJZFoFZoKFgYVW`eKFl^ZW_DF]lVWa^gVFD_Y]Yf[K`JDZW`VWaFKf[K`J`_ZF^ZW_DF]VJDZW`VWa ^gVFD_D^VJDZW`FKcVFaDWcJIK|ZWDWcTZaKVWaJIKsoogD^VWJz`oFZoZ`KaoFZtK^J}VWauhvFKf[DFKJIVJJIK qgVWWDWc{D\D`DZWWZJ^ZWJK]ogVJKVIKVFDWcaVJK[WJDgNIV\K_[ggYFK^KD\KaJIKVW`eKF`VWa ^gVFD_D^VJDZW`JIVJNIV\KpKKWFKf[K`JDWcVWaKxoK^JJZFKf[K`JG MNEONPQRMCOOPPOSTOU MIVWXYZ[_ZFYZ[FVJJKWJDZWJZJID`]VJJKFGNeDgg_ZggZe[oJID`K]VDgeDJIV^VggJZYZ[G ~KcVFa`l PJK\KWPVg`pKFc jk€‚€ƒj„ 




  
)

†

"
?< #$##<$&><() *

+
,-+ 



+



+
,-+ 



+

 ./01
23)435!264447849&#$472:$#;%

<'472:$#%$

#$472:$$==>?@

A+
 B

Item 6.A
02/22/22
198 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 


 






 

 





 
 !
"
#
 

"
 

!

$ %!
  &!'


 
  
( )
#
 !*
!
* 
! 
 !
+
*!  
!

 !
 *


! 

!  


   
 & 

  



 "
 

!

* 
 
# 


"
 

!&!
#
)!  
!

 , *
 
!  

"
 

!!!
#

 
! 

#

"
"
  - .
& 
$ %!
  &


*
 /0
'0'1'
&!!
#

*  
 

  
!&! 
 
- !
  
*#
&! # )! (




!
#

"
 

! +

 


#

!*


 - !)! ! 
 
( )  
"
 
#

"
!! "
  


! - ! 
!
  
*
  
##

 
##
%!&




*


#

!
 

#
#
*

 
*


! *
 ##

 
##
& !
#
!
 # 

"
 *
 

! %!&

*


 


#
#




#  
 !
!*
  
"
 
*



!&! 


#  "
  
 

! & 

2#
 *!# 

 

   
- 


2!
 
   

&


!
  
 !
*


!
!

+
* )
#

 

! )! 
 
! - !#
 3 
& *



1! & * 
! 


 !
&
  
 *


!


 !
*



#
*

 
  

#
 
 & 
( )
#
  *

  
!
 !
#
  

"
  4& 




! +
*
 !
 *


& 

!*
!
* 
 !!
 

"
 & 



 
!
 
 !
! *


3#
!
#

 !#** 
5 


 
 
! 
%## !

 !


 !
*


&!#




 !


!6
!!   

##
#
 


!*


2#

 & !*
#  
7  


 !
  

 !#




 


$ %!
  ##

&
&!
"
 !
"
 
 ! 
! 
$ 7!
! 
%## ##
!#8
 9!'



 
( ) 

#

 !
 




! 

!  

*


"
  !
2#
  
"
 6 Item 6.A
02/22/22
199 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 





 

 
 


  




  !"#$"% &'
Item 6.A
02/22/22
200 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))  


 





 
!"#$% &'()(*&+,-.(/01-+,-.(/0-23-*45637 89(:;<;:=::>?=@AB 86?C+)DEFGD'(1C+)DE4FGD'(2-+*'+36*D5+406)7 HIJKHJLMNO PQJRSTUVLIKTWVXQYZ[\\KIJXQUV]]U^_Y`JR]MJaUY bIaJKN_c `]ILIR`J\_dIKa efgheijhkflm nopqrstuvwxyvz{|stuvw}xyvz{~t€zt‚€vƒt}„‚u
 †‡ˆ‰rŠ‹{wtŒŽ{‹tŒ‘’“’’”•–—˜™ šprt›{„~€}ƒ‚|t›{„~€}ƒ‚ 
œrstuvw™tž€|stuvw}™tž€~t€zt‚€vƒt}„‚u
Ÿ t€wt t€žt„‚| t€wt} t€žt„‚~t€zt‚€vƒt}„‚u
 †¡¢£‡‰rŠ¤™¥¤ ¦ŽŠ§¥¥  ¥¨©¥ª•’“¥¨Š«“’¬–t€w­—¥¨Š«“’–“t€w’“¥¨Š«““®®¯”‘ t€°vƒ{€z{±›uw}  s{t z{u{€¤ytu{{ƒ{vu{wŒ‚‹u‚vƒ{tv›t€wŒ‚‹{tv›}±Œ{€wv€„zyv{tv›¤tt²v€„ t€wt t€žt„‚ ³‚zy{©vzŒ™t€t„{´¦µƒ{z‚ƒy{w‹›{t”“v€‹z{{{ž€„¶vzyŒ‚‹{t€wstuvw™tž€}¤t··{ƒvtz{Œ‚‹ ¶‚²v€„¶vzy t€wt}Šyt€²Œ‚‹}  
¸¹º»¼½¾»¿À ÁM]T^JRJaIK _JR]JWURMXJYaUL ÂJXIdUUSÃPÄM]]IKÃZR_]JaKJW ÅÆÇÈÉÊ»ÇÀ¿ËÌ»¿ÍËÎŹϿ¹ÐËϻɹÑÒ¹»ÓÔÕ¼¹¿ÀÈ  Item 6.A
02/22/22
201 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))  

 





 

! "#$% &'()(*&+,-.(/01-+,-.(/0-23-*45637 8/9:;<=;:>::<<?@<AB C6?D+)9EFG9'(1E+)9E4HG9'(2-+*'+36*95+406)7 IJKLMN OJPKQRSMLTJUUVLWXQMLWSVYJWMPSQZUQRLQW[Q\LX]SVY^O_QQ``LaQO\JTMQ[QLKQMXVPSMQXRLPQWX JWMX]JXPSXLPQ\JT\JTXQM^bKQRX]QUJTX_Q\PVWX]TcO[VWXJ[XQMSVYXVJTaSVYXVLWXQRKQWQJWM [VPUQ`X]Qd`JWWLWeIQUJRXPQWXJWMLXTfVWLWegMPLWLTXRJXVRXV_LWJ``SJWT\QRPShVWLWe[VMQ iYQTXLVWTcJWMXVWVX[RJPMV\WJ]QJRLWeMJXQYUVWPQYWXL`PSiYQTXLVWT]JMjQQWJWT\QRQM^kJ[] XLPQlLWemQVRQTUVWMQM\LX]TVPQTYjTXJW[QTVPQV_X]QXLPQcjYX[VWXLWYQMXVMJW[QJRVYWMPS iYQTXLVWTc\]L`QX]QnLXS[VWXLWYQMXVJXXQPUXXV[RJPMV\WJ]QJRLWeMJXQ\LX]VYXJWT\QRLWePS iYQTXLVWT^ o`XLPJXQ`ScSVYjQ[JPQJUJRXV_PSJ[XYJ``SjQLWePLT`QM^o`XLPJXQ`ScX]QnLXSMLM[RJPMV\WJ]QJRLWe MJXQYUVWPQc\LX]SVYRLPURLPJXYR^gWMSVY[VWXRLjYXQMXVX]QnLXS[VPU`QXQ`STJWMjJeeLWePQ^ bWpQjRYJRSqJWMrcORQJ[]QMVYXXVSVYJeJLWJ_XQRO_LWJ``S`QJRWQM_RVPX]QnLXSX]JXX]Qqsqqsqtqq MJXQ]JMjQQWTQXcJTaLWeSVYXV uvUw`QJTQLWXQRKQWQJWMRQiYLRQX]JXX]Q]QJRLWeMJXQjQUVTXUVWQMJWMU`QJTQRQiYLRQX]JXxyzX]Q fVWLWegMPLWLTXRJXVRURVUQR`SJWT\QRc[VW_LRPcJWM[`JRL_SPSiYQTXLVWTJWMRQiYQTXT_VR [VW_LRPJXLVWTJWM[`JRL_L[JXLVWTRQeJRMLWeX]QfVWLWenVMQJWMX]QgUU`L[JWX{TURVUVTQMURV|Q[X} JWMxqzRQiYLRQX]JXX]Qd`JWWLWeILKLTLVWWVX[VWXQPU`JXQJ]QJRLWeMJXQYWXL`O]JKQ_Y``S RQ[QLKQMX]QJWT\QRTJWM[`JRL_L[JXLVWTX]JXO]JKQjQQWRQiYQTXLWeJWMQZUQ[XXVRQiYQTX^~ mVYRQTUVWMQMVWpQjRYJRScLWKLXLWePQXVJPQQXLWe\LX]SVYJWMIJKLM€JRXLW^o`XLPJXQ`ScLWTXQJM V_UVTXUVWLWeX]Q]QJRLWec\]L[]JjTV`YXQ`SSVY\VY`M]JKQMVWQL_SVY\QRQXRQJXLWePQ\LX]_JLRWQTTc SVYRQUQJXQMX]Qd`JWWLWeIQUJRXPQWX{TTUQ[LVYTJReYPQWXX]JXX]QnLXSPYTXeV_VRX]\LX]X]Q]QJRLWe jQ[JYTQTVPY[]XLPQ]JMeVWQjSTLW[QO]JM_L`QMPSJUUQJ`^Y[]JReYPQWXLTTUQ[LVYTjQ[JYTQO ]JKQjQQWML`LeQWX`SJXXQPUXLWeXVVjXJLWJWT\QRTXVPSiYQTXLVWT_VRPVRQX]JWX]QUJTXy‚PVWX]T^ƒ]Q nLXS[JYTQMX]QMQ`JS„WVXPQ„SQXOJPjQLWeMLTJMKJWXJeQMJWMXRQJXQMYW_JLR`S^ OXJUUQJRTX]JXSVYJ`TVMQ[QLKQMPQJWMTJWMjJeeQMPQ^g``J`VWeOX]VYe]XSVY]JMjQQW]Q`ULWePQ jSSVYRRQJ[]LWeVYXXVX]Qd`JWWLWeIQUJRXPQWX^OX]VYe]XX]JXSQTXQRMJS{TPQQXLWe\JTXV_LWJ``S RQTV`KQX]Q_J[XX]JXX]QS\QRQWVXRQJ``SjQLWeURVUQR`SRQTUVWTLKQXVSVYRQ__VRXTXVeQXX]QPXVJWT\QR PSiYQTXLVWT^OWTXQJMcX]QTQUJTX_Q\PVWX]TJWMSQTXQRMJS{TPQQXLWeTQRKQMXVTQXPQYUXVjQ [VPU`QXQ`STJWMjJeeQMjSX]QURV[QTT„[RJPPLWeMV\WJ]QJRLWeMJXQ„JWMOTXL``MVWVX]JKQPS iYQTXLVWTJWT\QRQM^ mVYT[]QMY`QMX]QPQQXLWe_VRSQTXQRMJScVW`SX\VjYTLWQTTMJSTjQ_VRQX]Q]QJRLWeMJXQc`QJKLWePQ J`PVTXWVXLPQXVQKQWURVKLMQ[VPPQWXTLWJMKJW[QV_X]QXJ__ QUVRXcJWMURQUJRQLWVX]QR\JST_VR X]Q]QJRLWe^OX]JMXVjQVjKLVYTX]JXPSUYRUVTQLWXJaLWeX]QPQQXLWe\JT_VRX]QnLXSXVUVTXUVWQX]Q ]QJRLWeJWM_VRPQXVeQXPSiYQTXLVWTJWT\QRQM^OWTXQJMcSVYYTQMX]QPQQXLWeXVJTaPQJjVYXX]Q URVUVTQMURV|Q[X^OeJKQSVYJWMIJKLM€JRXLWJ[VPUQ``LWe`QeJ`RQJTVW\]SX]QXJ__ QUVRXT]VY`M RQ[VPPQWMJeJLWTXX]QURVUVTQMURV|Q[X„X]JXX]QPY`XL†UYRUVTQRVVP\L``jQYTQM_VR[`JTTRVVP J[XLKLXLQTc\]QRQjSJMMLXLVWJ`UJRaLWeLTRQiYLRQMYWMQRX]QfVWLWenVMQ^ O_X]Qd`JWWLWeIQUJRXPQWX\QRQXVJ[XLWJ_JLRcVj|Q[XLKQcJWM]VWQTXPJWWQRcLX\VY`MRQ[VPPQWM JeJLWTXX]QURV|Q[X_VRX]JXJWMVX]QRRQJTVWT^‡YXLWTXQJMcOTYTUQ[XX]JXX]JXPQQXLWe\JTYTQMXVQZU`VRQ Item 6.A 02/22/22
202 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 












 



 











 





















 
!











!




 

 




 

 







 

 

!






 

"

 #



 $






 


 %&'(%)*(+&,-
./012345657389:;5<=>:89:;5<=:?@:7ABC@D
EFGH2IJ5:K8LMN5;<J8<LOMPQPPRSQTUV W02X86YKZ[Y45>X86YKAZ[Y45?:8748@C7YB8A=C6D E\]^F_H2`5SIaVba3cNIdbb33befbgSPQbeIhQPTi87KjkbeIhQPiQ87KPQbeIhQQllRmO387nYB5745o96KA  pp
q r
 


st


u




 


 %&'(%)*(+&,-
./012X86YKZ[Y45>X86YKAZ[Y45?:8748@C7YB8A=C6D EFGH2IJ5:K8LMN5;<J8<LOMPQPPmSikUV W02:89:;5<=:?@:7ABC@>:89:;5<=:?@:7ABC@D v_2X86YKV8<w7>X86YKAV8<w7?:8748@C7YB8A=C6Dx387K<8387w8=C>387K<8A387w8=C?:8748@C7YB8A=C6D E\]^F_H2IaVba3cNIdbb33befbgSPQbeIhQPTi87KjkbeIhQPiQ87KPQbeIhQQllRmO387nYB5745o96KA  X58<345657Ma[865<5B5Y65KLCJ<6CYB5@8Y9:87KLCJ<5@8Y9:AoL:57KY7=4[Y:5@8Y9Ma8@8:yY7=387K<8387w8=C z<C@4[5fY4LV878=5<{:c|B54C:B[5KJ958mQ@Y7J45@55w7=}Y4[LCJM@5M87KX86YKV8<w7Aa8~~<5BY845LCJ }C<yY7=}Y4[387K<8AI[87yLCJA  
Item 6.A
02/22/22
203 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 

 

 





!
 "#$%&'$
 () *(+", -(,&./012
% 
Item 6.A
02/22/22
204 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
205 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
206 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) Item 6.A
02/22/22
207 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
208 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
209 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
210 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
211 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
212 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
213 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
214 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
215 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
216 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
217 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
218 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
219 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
220 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
221 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
222 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
223 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
224 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
225 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
226 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
227 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
228 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
229 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
230 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
231 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
232 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
233 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
234 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
235 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
236 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
237 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
238 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
239 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
240 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
241 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
242 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
243 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
244 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
245 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
246 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
247 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
248 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
249 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
250 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
251 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
252 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
253 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
254 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
255 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
256 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
257 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
258 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
259 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
260 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
261 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
262 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
263 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
264 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
265 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
266 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
267 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Item 6.A
02/22/22
268 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission Item 6.A
02/22/22
269 of 269 Item 6.A
02/22/22

6.A.g
Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: Written Comments (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 873 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 874 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 884 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 885 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 887 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 888 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.h
Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 1 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 892 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 908 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 910 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

6.A.i
Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: ADD-TO: Supplement to Appellant's Appeal Statement Received 2/22/22 Part 2 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

FOR PURPOSES OF CODE COMPLIANCE

PARCEL COVERAGE CALCULATIONS
TOTAL NEW UPPER LEVEL PARCEL COVERAGE = 1,531 SF
NEW ELEVATORS = 290 SF
NEW ADMIN OFFICES = 840 SF
SECOND FLOOR (UPPER LEVEL):

NEW PARCEL COVERAGE:

EXISTING PARCEL COVERAGE: 16,985 SF
TOTAL UPPER LEVEL PARCEL COVERAGE:

EXISTING = 16,985 SF
TOTAL (EXISTING + NEW) = 18,516 SF
NEW = 1,531 SF
90% OF MAIN LEVEL PARCEL COVERAGE

ALLOWED BASED ON MINOR
MODIFICATION INCREASE TO 45.29% OF
TOTAL PARCEL AREA:

TOTAL UPPER LEVEL
PARCEL COVERAGE:
(NEW + EXISTING)
18,516 SF
( < 90 % OF MAIN LEVEL

PARCEL COVERAGE)
20,863.13 SF
x .45
MAIN LEVEL PARCEL 46,362.50 SF

COVERAGE
ALLOWED BY CODE:
18,898.2 SF
x .90
20,998 SF
AREA UNDER STRUCTURE = 401 SF

MAIN LEVEL PARCEL

COVERAGE ALLOWED BY
MINOR MODIFICATION (45.29%)
20,998 SF
NEW PARCEL COVERAGE:

NEW ENCLOSED LUNCH SEATING = 843 SF
TOTAL NEW MAIN LEVEL PARCEL COVERAGE = 2,462 SF
NEW ELEVATORS = 278 SF

EXISTING MAIN LEVEL
PARCEL COVERAGE:

PARCEL COVERAGE CALCULATIONS
TOTAL PARCEL AREA FROM SURVEY):

FIRST FLOOR (MAIN LEVEL):

EXISTING PARCEL COVERAGE: 18,536 SF
TOTAL MAIN LEVEL PARCEL COVERAGE:

EXISTING = 18,536 SF
TOTAL (EXISTING + NEW) = 20,998 SF
NEW = 2,462 SF

NEW MAIN LEVEL
PARCEL COVERAGE:

TOTAL MAIN LEVEL
PARCEL COVERAGE:
(NEW + EXISTING)
18,536 SF
(39.98 % OF PARCEL AREA)
46,362.50 SF
2,462 SF
(5.31 % OF PARCEL AREA)
20,998 SF
(45.29 % OF PARCEL AREA)

FOR PURPOSES OF CODE COMPLIANCE
NOTE: THE CLASSROOMS ALONG THE REAR ALLEY ARE

TREATED AS THE UPPER LEVEL FOR PURPOSES OF THIS

CALCULATION OF PARCEL COVERAGE PER THE
DEFINITIONS CONTAINED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE.

SEE FLOOR LEVEL DIAGRAMS FOR MORE INFO.

AREA UNDER STRUCTURE = 1,231 SF
NEW STAIR = 110 SF
PROJECT NAME:

ADDRESS:

OWNER:

CONTACT:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

ZONING:

EXISTING USE:

PROPOSED USE:

EXISTING ENROLLMENT:

PROPOSED ENROLLMENT:

EXISTING HOURS OF
OPERATION:

PROPOSED HOURS OF
OPERATION:

EXISTING HEIGHT:

PROPOSED HEIGHT:

EXISTING # OF
CLASSROOMS:

PROPOSED # OF
CLASSROOMS:

PROJECT INFORMATION

CARLTHORP ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SUPPORT

SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
438 SAN VICENTE BLVD.

SANTA MONICA, CA 90402

CARLTHORP SCHOOL

NOLA-RAE CRONAN, HEAD OF SCHOOL

NEW MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM TO BE ADDED BELOW
GRADE. AN ELEVATED PLAYCOURT TO BE ADDED

ABOVE EXISTING SECOND-FLOOR CLASSROOMS
ALONG REAR ALLEY. NEW SCHOOL

ADMINISTRATION OFFICES TO BE BUILT ALONG

INTERIOR COURTYARD ABOVE EXISTING LUNCH
SEATING AREA TO BE ENCLOSED. NO ADDITIONAL

CLASSROOMS, ENROLLMENT CAPACITY OR
FACULTY.

R2 / SAN VICENTE BOULEVARD COURTYARD

APARTMENTS HISTORIC DISTRICT
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (K-6), GROUP E

NO CHANGE
40 STUDENTS PER GRADE, TYP.

NO CHANGE
8:00am - 3:00pm

NO CHANGE
30' ABOVE AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE

NO CHANGE
22 NO CHANGE
32 SPACES (+2 ACCESSIBLE STALLS)
TANDEM SPACES APPROVED PER VAR95-022

NO CHANGE
21 SHORT TERM (1.5 / 20 STUDENTS)
11 LONG TERM (0.5 / CLASSROOM)
TOTAL: 32 SPACES
BIKE RACK AT FRONT ENTRY (12 SPACES)
BIKE RACK AT REAR PARKING (8 SPACES)
TOTAL: 20 SPACES
11 ADD'L SHORT TERM BIKE SPACES AT ENTRY
11 LONG TERM BIKE LOCKERS
TOTAL: 22 SPACES
FRONT YARD: 20'
SIDE YARD: 8' MIN (10' AVERAGE)
REAR YARD: 15' (TO CENTERLINE OF ALLEY)
FRONT YARD: 21'-1"
SIDE YARD: 16'-2" (WEST)
5'-8" (EAST)
REAR YARD: 16'-4" (TO CENTERLINE OF ALLEY)
FRONT YARD: NO CHANGE
SIDE YARD: 10'-2" (WEST)

NO CHANGE (EAST)
REAR YARD: 15'-0" (TO CENTERLINE OF ALLEY)

FLOOD ZONE X
185.69, 183.77, 190.36, 188.55
748.37 / 4 = 187.09 ANG

ON-SITE URBAN RUNOFF

DETENTION/PERCOLATION SYSTEM TO BE ADDED
AS REQUIRED PER CODE.

EXISTING PARKING:

PROPOSED PARKING:

REQUIRED BIKE PARKING:

EXISTING BIKE PARKING:

PROPOSED BIKE PARKING:

REQUIRED SETBACKS:

EXISTING SETBACKS:

PROPOSED SETBACKS:

FLOOD ZONE:

AVERAGE NATURAL
GRADE::

STORMWATER FILTRATION:

FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS PARCEL COVERAGE CALCULATIONS
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE

CITY COUNCIL

REVIEW SET (BASED

ON PLANNING

COMMISSION

APPROVAL)
2/8/22 12:58:01 PM
As indicated CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A000
COVER

04.20.22 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
**Application to Amend Existing CUP for Existing Elementary School

CARLTHORP ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS

FOR PURPOSES OF CEQA EXEMPTION FOR PURPOSES OF CODE COMPLIANCE

BASEMENT/GROUND FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING
GROUND/2ND FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING 2ND FLOOR/ROOF PLAN - EXISTING ROOF PLAN - EXISTING

BASEMENT/GROUND FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED
GROUND/2ND FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR/ROOF PLAN - PROPOSED ROOF PLAN - PROPOSED

BASEMENT/GROUND FLOOR PLAN - DEMO
GROUND/2ND FLOOR PLAN - DEMO 2ND FLOOR/ROOF PLAN - DEMO ROOF PLAN - DEMO

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) w
a
t
er l i n e
ha
ndi c
a
p
pa
rk in
g
ha
ndi c
a
pp
ark in
g
188 186 184
184
184
1 86
191
192
190
190
185
190
2 34
.0
0 tp
p
2 2
7 .6
2 H
P22
7 .6
8 H
P
22 7
.6
1 H
P
2 34
.
68 H
P 234
.1
0 HP 234
.
52 H
P
2 26
.7
3 A
RM
2 27
.7
8 H
P
222
.21
TPP
2 0
9 .3
3 U
T
2 11
.02
UT
2 07
.8
0 U
T
2 28
.4
3 H
P
2 2
8 .4
6 H
P
2 28
.6
9 H
P
2 0
3 .64
U
T
2 08
.6
2 U
T
2 0
3 .
78 U
T
2 0
7 .
42 2U0T9
.
35 U
T
23 1
.87
H
P2
28 .4
7 H
P
23 1
.59
TPP
2 07
.2
4 U
T
2 08
.12
2U0T3
.9
5 U
T
23 1.81
2H1P3
.69
H2
1P9
.80
H
P
2 28
.4
0 2H2P8
.2
6 H
P
2 13
.76
H
P
2 31
.86
H
P
2 1
9 .75
H
P
2 13
.62
H
P
22 1
.
34 2H2P1
.
54 HP22
1 .
52 HP
22 5
.
22 2H2P5.
3 1
HP
8"
vc
p
sanit
a
ry
se
we
ro
n
cen
te
r line

10.00'
N
4 2
°
3 7'
24 "E
21 3
.0
7'
N42°06'00"E
213.11'

10.00'
N 47° 52' 56" W
293.55'
N
4 2°
37'
24 "E
134

2. 43'
21 3.0
7'
218.55'
N 47° 53' 43" W
291.60'
216.60'
CL

PROPOSED ROOFTOP

CHILDREN'S PLAY COURT
(OPEN AIR)
+126'-6"

PROPOSED

ADDITION

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR

PROPOSED STAIR WITH

LANDSCAPED SCREENING

EXISTING

STRUCTURE

SAN VICENTE BLVD

GEORGINA PL

FUTURE SOLAR
PANELS

PROPERTY LINE
10' - 0"
15' - 0"

TRASH &

RECYCLING
9' - 0" 5' - 0"
18' - 0"
11' - 4" 8' - 1"
**ALLEY UTILITY LINES TO BE RELOCATED

UNDERGROUND
HEDGE
HEIGHT
20'
8' TALL
HEDGE

TREE PROTECTION ZONE
(10' FROM DRIPLINE)
10'
- 0"
21' - 1"
213' - 0"
216' - 4"
10' - 2"

OF ALLEY

PROPOSED BIKE RACKS
(11 ADDITIONAL SPACES)
5' -8"' CL

EXISTING BIKE RACKS
12 SPACES

TO CL OF ALLEY
15' - 0" MIN
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE

CITY COUNCIL

REVIEW SET (BASED

ON PLANNING

COMMISSION

APPROVAL)
2/8/22 12:58:03 PM
3/32" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A001
PLOT PLAN 04.20.22 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 PLOT PLAN
N

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
4/23/20 3:49:19 PM CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A001

SITE SURVEY
200421

SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
N

04.20.22 05.12.20
SW CORNER:
183.77' (SURVEY)
101.15' (PERMIT DOCS)
SE CORNER:
185.81(SURVEY)
103.19' (PERMIT DOCS)
NE CORNER:
190.36'(SURVEY)
107.74' (PERMIT DOCS)
NW CORNER:
188.55' (SURVEY)
105.93' (PERMIT DOCS)

ANG PER SURVEY
(BASED ON SMMC AT TIME OF PREVIOUS

PERMITS)
(188.55' + 190.36' + 185.81' + 183.77') / 4 =
187.12'

ANG PER SURVEY
(BASED ON CURRENT SMMC)
(189.34' + 191.92' + 185.97' + 184.02') / 4 =
187.81’

ANG PER PERMIT DOCS
104.5'
DIFFERENCE FACTOR = 82.62' NE CORNER:
191.92'(SURVEY)
109.3' (PERMIT DOCS)
NW CORNER:
189.34' (SURVEY)
106.72' (PERMIT DOCS)
SW CORNER:
184.02'(SURVEY)
101.4' (PERMIT DOCS)
SE CORNER:
185.97'(SURVEY)
103.35' (PERMIT DOCS)

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:25:49 AM CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A002

SITE CONTEXT

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS

CARLTHORP

05.12.20 04.20.22

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp PARKING - 32 STALLS

STORAGE

BREAK OUT
ROOM

SPANISH

MULTI-PURPOSE RM
MATH

READING
P.E. OFFICE
PL
1 17
2 18
3 19
4 20
5 21
6 22
7 23
8 24
9 25
10 26
11 27
12 28
13 29
14 30
15 31
16 32
(ASSIGNED TANDEM PARKING

TO FACULTY/STAFF)

STORAGE

FACILITIES
OFFICE

MAIN POWER

SHUT OFF
ELEV

ROOM SERVER
ROOM
STOR
STOR

READING
ROOM

FACULTY
LOUNGE
STOR
BIKE STORAGE - 8 SPACES
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:25:50 AM
3/32" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A100

LOWER LEVEL

FLOOR -EXISTING

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING
N

05.12.20 04.20.22 EXISTING

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp DN

SCIENCE CLASSROOM -
4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
2ND GRADE

CLASSROOM -
2ND GRADE

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

RECEPTION/

FRONT OFFICE

BOARDROOM

KITCHEN

EXISTING ARTIFICIAL
TURF PLAYFIELD6' - 0"
7' - 2"
5' - 8"

HANDICAPPED PARKING HANDICAPPED PARKING PLANTER

BIKE RACK

FLAGPOLE

OUTDOOR

LUNCH AREA

EXISTING

BASKETBALL
COURT

EXISTING

KINDERGARTEN

PLAYCOURT
HEDGE
PL

GATE ENTRANCE
HEDGE

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN
16' - 2"
21' - 1"

CL OF ALLEY
16' - 4"
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:25:50 AM
3/32" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A101

MAIN LEVEL PLAN
- EXISTING

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN - EXISTING
N

05.12.20 04.20.22 EXISTING

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp

LIBRARY

COMPUTER LAB

OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE

ART ROOM

READING ROOM

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
PL
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:25:51 AM
3/32" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A102

UPPER LEVEL

PLAN - EXISTING

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 UPPER LEVEL PLAN - EXISTING
N

05.12.20 04.20.22 EXISTING

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp PL

ROOFTOP MECH EQUIP

ROOFTOP MECH EQUIP
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:25:52 AM
3/32" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A103

ROOF PLAN -

EXISTING

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 ROOF PLAN - EXISTING
N

05.12.20 04.20.22

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp +97'-3"

LOWER LEVEL FLOOR
+97'-3"
+101'-6"

FOOTPRINT OF NEW

CONSTRUCTION ABOVE
PL
1 17
2 18
3 19
4 20
5 21
6 22
7 EVCS
23 8
EVCS
24 9
25 10
26 11
27 12
28 13 14
30 15
31 16
32 +89'-8"
+89'-8"4' - 0"
3' - 8"

LOWER LEVEL (ABOVE)
+97'-3"
STAGE
+91'-8"

PROPOSED

MULTI-PURPOSE RM

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR

TIERED SEATING
26' - 8" 26' - 8" 26' - 8" 26' - 8" 26' - 8"
22' - 10"
PARKING - 32 STALLS

STORAGE

BREAK OUT
ROOM

SPANISH

EXISTING

MULTI-PURPOSE RM
MATH

READING
P.E. OFFICE
PL
(ASSIGNED TANDEM PARKING

TO FACULTY/STAFF)

STORAGE

FACILITIES
OFFICE

MAIN POWER

SHUT OFF
ELEV

ROOM SERVER
ROOM
STOR
STOR

FACULTY
LOUNGE
STOR
+91'-8"
8' - 1"
(E) BIKE STORAGE
65' - 6"
75' - 11" 22' - 9"
130' - 3"

EXISTING READING ROOM

TO BE CONVERTED TO

RESTROOMS & SHOWERS

PROPOSED STAIR

AND PARTITION

CORRIDOR
5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" TYP
PROVIDE 5' x 5' HVO TRIANGLE

CLEAR OF ALL OBSTRUCTIONS
ABOVE 24" IN HEIGHT PER SMMC

9.21.180
8 (N) STAFF LOCKERS
(ELECTRIC

VEHICLE

CHARGING

STATION)

INDICATES NEW CONSTRUCTION
LEGEND
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
4/23/20 3:49:19 PM
As indicated CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A120

LOWER LEVEL

FLOOR PLAN -

PROPOSED
200421

SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED
N
HVO
HVO
HVO

05.12.20 04.20.22 PROPOSED

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 922 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp DN
DN
DN
DN
DN

UP UPDN
DNDN
UP
63' - 0"

NEWENCLOSURE

OFEXISTING

LUNCHSEATING
AND/OR

ADDITIONAL

OFFICESPACE

OUTLINE OF MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM

BELOW GRADE

OUTLINE OF ELEVATED

COURT ABOVE

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR
PL

ARTIFICIAL TURF

PLAYFIELD
5' - 8"
21' - 1"

HANDICAPPED PARKING HANDICAPPED PARKING PLANTER
(E) SHORT TERM BIKE STORAGE
12 SPACES

GATE ENTRANCE

FLAGPOLE
HEDGE
HEDGE

SCIENCE CLASSROOM -
4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
2ND GRADE

CLASSROOM -
2ND GRADE

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

RECEPTION/

FRONT OFFICE

BOARDROOM

KITCHEN

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN
21' - 4" 26' - 8" 26' - 8" 26' - 8" 26' - 8" 26' - 8"
22' - 10"
15' - 0"

CL OF ALLEY
16' - 4"
16' - 2"
10' - 2"

PROPOSED ADDITIONAL SHORT TERM

BIKE STORAGE
12 SPACES
11 (N) LONG TERM BIKE STORAGE LOCKERS
(DERO 300 SERIES OR EQUAL)
(VISIBLE FROM EMPLOYEE WORK AREA PER SMMC 9.28.140(F))
2' - 6"

BETWEEN SPACES
24" TYP

INDICATES NEW CONSTRUCTION
LEGEND
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
5/12/20 6:44:32 PM
As indicated CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A121

MAIN LEVEL PLAN -

PROPOSED

05.12.20 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN - PROPOSED
N

STAIR WITH

LANDSCAPED
SCREEN
DN

04.20.22 PROPOSED

CLASSROOM FLOOR TO

BE DEMOLISHED AND
REBUILT AT +105' - 8" WITH

RAMP FOR ACCESS

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 923 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp DN
1 A300
63' - 0"
133' - 5"
A200 1
13' - 0"
1 A301

PROPOSED ROOFTOP

CHILDREN'S PLAY COURT
(OPEN AIR)
+126'-6"

UPPER LEVEL
+119'-6"
+119'-6"
+126'-6"
A200 2
A201 1
A201 2
A200 3
2 A301
13' - 0" 13' - 0" 13' - 0" 11' - 3"

PROPOSED
ADMIN

OFFICES
PL

LIBRARY

COMPUTER LAB

OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE

ART ROOM

READING
ROOM

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
6' - 8" 74' - 0" 5' - 0"

NEW CONSTUCTION
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:25:53 AM
As indicated CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A122

UPPER LEVEL

PLAN - PROPOSED

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 UPPER LEVEL PLAN - PROPOSED
N

05.12.20 STAIR WITH

LANDSCAPED
SCREEN
32' - 3" 11' - 5" 61' - 9"
+119'-6"

PROPOSED
ADMIN

OFFICES

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR
OOO
DN

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR

TRELLISED

WALKWAY
17' - 2" 13' - 3" 32' - 3"

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR

04.20.22 PROPOSED

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp 1 A300
2 A300
A200 1
1 A301
A200 2
A201 1
A201 2
A200 3
2 A301
138' - 5"
68' - 5"

PROPOSED ROOFTOP

CHILDREN'S PLAY COURT
(OPEN AIR)
+126'-6"

EXISTING ROOF
PL

FUTURE SOLAR PANELS

NEW CONSTUCTION
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:25:54 AM
As indicated CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A123

ROOF PLAN -

PROPOSED

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 ROOF PLAN - PROPOSED
N

05.12.20 STAIR WITH

LANDSCAPED
SCREEN

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR

TRELLISED WALKWAY BELOW

PROPOSED
ELEVATOR 04.20.22

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp (E) Upper Level
+119' - 6"
(E) Top of Roof
+134' - 0"
(E) Main Level
+107' - 6"
(E) A.N.G.
+104' - 6"
(E) Roof
+130' - 3 1/2"
(E) Top of Court
+126' - 6"

PROPOSED

OPEN-AIR COURT (BEHIND)

PROPOSED
STAIR
3' - 0" 12' - 0" 7' - 0" 3' - 10" 3' - 9"

EXISTING

STRUCTURE BEYOND
OPEN
TO
BEYOND
OPEN
TO
BEYOND
OPEN
TO
BEYOND
OPEN
TO
BEYOND
OPEN
TO
BEYOND
OPEN
TO
BEYOND
OPEN
TO
BEYOND

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR BEYOND
(E) Upper Level
+119' - 6"
(E) Top of Roof
+134' - 0"
(E) Main Level
+107' - 6"
(E) A.N.G.
+104' - 6"
(E) Roof
+130' - 3 1/2"
(E) Top of Court
+126' - 6"

PROPOSED

OPEN-AIR COURT
(BEHIND)

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR BEYOND

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR

PROPOSED

ADMINISTRATIVE

OFFICES

PROPOSED ENCLOSURE

OF LUNCH AREA
3' - 9"3' - 10" 7' - 0" 12' - 0" 3' - 0"
OPEN
TO
BEYOND

EXISTING

ROOF BEYOND

EXISTING STRUCTURE ADJACENT BUILDING BEYOND PROPOSED
STAIR
(E) Upper Level
+119' - 6"
(E) Top of Roof
+134' - 0"
(E) Main Level
+107' - 6"
(E) A.N.G.
+104' - 6"
(E) Roof
+130' - 3 1/2"
(E) Top of Court
+126' - 6"
3' - 9"3' - 10" 7' - 0" 12' - 0" 3' - 0"

PROPOSED

OPEN-AIR COURT (BEHIND)

PROPOSED
STAIR

EXISTING STRUCTURE

EXISTING

STRUCTURE
OPEN
TO
BEYOND
OPEN
TO
BEYOND
27' - 6"
27' - 6"

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR BEYOND

NEW CONSTUCTION
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:00 AM
1/8" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A200

ELEVATIONS

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
1/8" = 1'-0"
1 SOUTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"
2 WEST ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"
3 NORTH ELEVATION - FROM SAN VICENTE

05.12.20 PROPOSED OPENAIR PLAY COURT
BEHIND

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR
BEYOND

PROPOSED
STAIR

EXTERIOR PLASTER WITH TEXTURED

FINISH OR MURAL
WITH LANDSCAPED SCREEN WITH LANDSCAPED SCREEN WITH LANDSCAPED SCREEN WITH LANDSCAPED SCREEN WITH LANDSCAPED SCREEN 04.20.22

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp (E) Upper Level
+119' - 6"
(E) Top of Roof
+134' - 0"
(E) Main Level
+107' - 6"
(E) A.N.G.
+104' - 6"
(E) Roof
+130' - 3 1/2"
(E) Top of Court
+126' - 6"

PROPOSED OPEN-AIR

COURT (BEHIND)

PROPOSED
STAIR

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR
3' - 9"3' - 10" 7' - 0" 12' - 0" 3' - 0"
OPEN
TO
BEYOND
OPEN
TO
BEYOND
OPEN
TO
BEYOND

EXISTING

STRUCTURE
(E) Upper Level
+119' - 6"
(E) Top of Roof
+134' - 0"
(E) Main Level
+107' - 6"
(E) A.N.G.
+104' - 6"
(E) Roof
+130' - 3 1/2"
(E) Top of Court
+126' - 6"
3' - 9"3' - 10" 7' - 0" 12' - 0" 3' - 0"

PROPOSED ELEVATED COURT EXISTING STRUCTURE

NEW CONSTUCTION
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:03 AM
1/8" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A201

ELEVATIONS

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
1/8" = 1'-0"
2 NORTH ELEVATION - FROM COURTYARD
1/8" = 1'-0"
1 EAST ELEVATION

05.12.20 WITH LANDSCAPED SCREEN 04.20.22

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 927 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp T ectoni Cp yright 207T ectoni Cp yright 207
(E) Upper Level
+119' - 6"
(E) Top of Roof
+134' - 0"
(E) MAIN LEVEL
+107' - 6"
(E) Lower Level Floor
+97' - 3"
(E) A.N.G.
+104' - 6"
(E) Main Level Upper
+110' - 0"
Lower Level Base
+89' - 8"
(E) Roof
+130' - 3 1/2"
2 A300
16' - 4"
(E) Top of Court
+126' - 6"

PROPOSED

MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM

PROPOSED

ELEVATED COURT
(OPEN TO SKY)

PROPOSED STAIR

EXISTING DANCE

CLASSROOM
3' - 9"3' - 10" 7' - 0" 9' - 6" 2' - 6" 7' - 7" 10' - 3"

EXISTING BUILDING BEYOND
30' - 0"

EXISTING BUILDING BEYOND

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR BEYOND
(E) Upper Level
+119' - 6"
(E) Top of Roof
+134' - 0"
(E) MAIN LEVEL
+107' - 6"
(E) Lower Level Floor
+97' - 3"
(E) A.N.G.
+104' - 6"
(E) Lower Level Floor
Upper
+101' - 6"
(E) Main Level Upper
+110' - 0"
1 A300
Lower Level Base
+89' - 8"
(E) Roof
+130' - 3 1/2"

PROPOSED ELEVATED

OPEN AIR PLAYCOURT
1 A301
(E) Top of Court
+126' - 6"

EXISTING

CLASSROOM

EXISTING

PARKING

PROPOSED

MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM

PROPOSED

ADMINISTRATIVE

ADDITION

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR
BEYOND

PROPOSED ENCLOSURE OF

EXISTING LUNCH SEATING
2 A301
3' - 9"3' - 10" 7' - 0" 9' - 6" 2' - 6"3' - 0"3' - 0"4' - 3" 7' - 7"

EXISTING

STRUCTURE

EXISTING BUILDING
30' - 0"
3' - 9"

NEW CONSTUCTION
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:05 AM
1/8" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A300

SECTIONS

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
1/8" = 1'-0"
1 E/W SECTION THROUGH MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM
1/8" = 1'-0"
2 N/S SECTION THROUGH MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM &

ELEVATED COURT

05.12.20 WITH LANDSCAPED SCREEN 04.20.22

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp 12' - 0"

PROPOSED

ADMINISTRATIVE

ADDITION

PROPOSED

DINING AREA
8' - 6"
(E) Upper Level
+119' - 6"
(E) Top of Roof
+134' - 0"
(E) Main Level
+107' - 6"
(E) Lower Level Floor
+97' - 3"
(E) A.N.G.
(E) Basement Floor +104' - 6"
Upper
+101' - 6"
(E) Main Level Upper
+110' - 0"
(E) Roof
+130' - 3 1/2"
2 A300
(E) Top of Court
+126' - 6"

PROPOSED

ELEVATED COURT

EXISTING PARKING

EXISTING

CLASSROOMS
8' - 0"

NEW CONSTUCTION
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:06 AM
1/8" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A301

SECTIONS

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
1/8" = 1'-0"
1 SECTION THROUGH ADMIN ADDITION
1/8" = 1'-0"
2 E/W SECTION THROUGH ELEVATED COURT

EXTERIOR PLASTER

METAL CHANNEL & SCREEN,

POWDER COATED

PLEXIGLAS PANEL

STRUCTURAL WALL
1/8" = 1'-0"
1 SECTION THROUGH ADMIN ADDITION
3" = 1'-0"

PLAY COURT OPENING DETAIL
5 05.12.20

PROPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE

ADDITION

TRELLISED WALKWAY

MOUNTED TO TOP OR

SIDE OF WALL

04.20.22 6.A.j
Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp

LOWER LEVEL FLOOR
+97'-3"

LOWER LEVEL FLOOR
+101'-6"
PL
PARKING - 32 STALLS

STORAGE

BREAK OUT
ROOM

SPANISH

MULTI-PURPOSE RM
MATH

READING
P.E. OFFICE
PL
(ASSIGNED TANDEM PARKING

TO FACULTY/STAFF)

STORAGE

FACILITIES
OFFICE

MAIN POWER

SHUT OFF
ELEV

ROOM SERVER
ROOM
STOR
STOR

READING
ROOM

FACULTY
LOUNGE
STOR
BIKE STORAGE - 8 SPACES

DEMOLISHED
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:08 AM
As indicated CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
D100

LOWER LEVEL

FLOOR PLAN -
DEMO

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - DEMO
N

05.12.20 04.20.22 DEMO

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp DN
DN
DN

UP UPDN
DNDN
UP
PL

HANDICAPPED PARKING HANDICAPPED PARKING PLANTER

BIKE RACK

GATE ENTRANCE

FLAGPOLE
HEDGE
HEDGE

SCIENCE CLASSROOM -
4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
2ND GRADE

CLASSROOM -
2ND GRADE

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

RECEPTION/

FRONT OFFICE

BOARDROOM

KITCHEN

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN

CL OF ALLEY

DEMOLISHED
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/25/19 2:21:17 PM
As indicated CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
D101

MAIN LEVEL PLAN
- DEMO

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN - DEMO
N

05.12.20 04.20.22 DEMO

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp 63' - 0"
133' - 5"

UPPER LEVEL
+119'-6"39' - 0" 12' - 11" 10' - 5"
PL

LIBRARY

COMPUTER LAB

OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE

ART ROOM

READING ROOM

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE

DEMOLISHED
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:09 AM
As indicated CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
D102

UPPER LEVEL

PLAN - DEMO

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 UPPER LEVEL PLAN - DEMO
N

05.12.20 04.20.22 DEMO

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp PL

DEMOLISHED
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:10 AM
As indicated CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
D103

ROOF PLAN - DEMO

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 ROOF PLAN - DEMO
N

05.12.20 04.20.22

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:06 AM CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
AP.01

RENDERINGS

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
AERIAL VIEW - EXISTING + NEW CONSTRUCTION

05.12.20 04.20.22

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:06 AM CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
AP.02

RENDERINGS

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
VIEW FROM CENTRAL COURTYARD - EXISTING + NEW CONSTRUCTION

05.12.20 04.20.22

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:06 AM CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
AP.03

RENDERINGS

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PLAN - EXISTING + NEW CONSTRUCTION

05.12.20 04.20.22

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:06 AM CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
AP.04

SITE PHOTOS

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS

COURTYARD VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWEST

COURTYARD VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST

COURTYARD VIEW LOOKING NORTHWEST
COURTYARD VIEW LOOKING NORTHWEST TOWARD SAN VICENTE 05.12.20 04.20.22

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:07 AM CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
AP.05

SITE PHOTOS

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS

EAST SIDE OF SITE

EAST SIDE OF SITE

SOUTH SIDE OF SITE - GEORGINA PL N ACCESS TO PARKING

SOUTH SIDE OF SITE - GEORGINA PL N, ACCESS TO PARKING

05.12.20 04.20.22

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:07 AM CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
AP.06

SITE PHOTOS

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS

WEST SIDE OF SITE

VIEW FROM SAN VICENTE

05.12.20 04.20.22
102.67'
(Adjacent grade,
low point)
Existing floor at 107.5' to be
removed
New Floor at 105.67'
ANG 104.5' 3' - 0" 5' - 8"
Less than
40% of wall
surface is
exposed
Extents of wall
below grade
Basement Storage Diagram at Alley (South) Elevation
103.25'
(Adjacent grade,
low point) ANG 104.5'
Extents of wall
below grade
Existing floor at 107.5' to be
removed
New Floor at 105.67'
2' - 5"
Less than
40% of wall
surface is
exposed Basement Storage Diagram at East Elevation

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp SHEET
SHEET
DATE
1625 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
9/11/19 11:26:07 AM CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
AP.07

PRECEDENT

IMAGERY

06.20.19 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS

05.12.20 04.20.22

6.A.j
Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: Carlthorp School Planning Commission plan set 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp Veneklasen Associates
Consultants in Acoustics | Noise | Vibration | AV | IT
1711 Sixteenth Street • Santa Monica California 90404 • tel: 310.450.1733 • fax: 310.396.3424 • www.veneklasen.com May 27, 2020

KFA, LLP
3573 Hayden Avenue
Century City, California 90232
Attention: Wade Killefer
Subject: Carlthorp Support Space Improvements
Santa Monica, CA
Carlthorp Property Line Noise
Veneklasen Project No. 3055-046
Dear Wade:

Veneklasen Associates (Veneklasen) has completed a noise impact assessment of the Support Space Improvements proposed for Carlthorp School located in Santa Monica, California. The purpose of this evaluation was to model potential noise impacts on adjacent residential uses as a result of activity that will occur on the proposed rooftop playground and determine if modifications are needed to reduce noise levels to City Municipal Code Noise Limits. This report sets forth the results of our findings.

History and Project Manager
Founded in 1947, Veneklasen Associates is one of the largest acoustical consulting firms in the United States. Our services encompass architectural acoustics, audio-visual (AV), information technology (IT), environmental noise and vibration mitigation. As a sole source for building sound quality and data management, our technical and professional standards have been developed through the design of literally thousands of buildings worldwide:
• Civic & Government Agencies • Hotels, Resorts & Casinos • Courthouses & Public Safety • Studios & Entertainment Facilities • Education - College & University + K-12 • Condominiums & Apartments • Commercial Buildings & Corporate Interiors • Concert Halls & Performing Arts Complexes • Transportation, including Airports & Rail • Medical Centers & Hospitals • Museums & Cultural Centers • Places of Worship
Our staff is carefully balanced, consisting of professionals with degrees in acoustics, physics, engineering, and architecture. With approximately 60 employees we are large enough to have a wealth of expertise to be shared, and small enough to ensure that each project is directed by a principal or senior associate. We are unique in that we own and maintain a comprehensive complement of scientific measurement and analysis tools including sound level meters, noise monitors, logging devices, field computers, vibration measurement equipment and data analytic software.

Finally, Veneklasen Associates is a State of California (DGS) Certified Small Business and a qualified SBE within GSA guidelines.

John LoVerde is known throughout the country for his work as an acoustical consultant as well as his leadership in testing, research, and reporting methodology, particularly in the fields of building and environmental acoustics. John has lent his expertise to the design of educational buildings, multifamily residential developments, performance venues, hotels and resorts, office campuses and hospitals. He has served as Project Manager for many notable projects and is often called upon to provide expert testimony. On average, John manages the design and construction of approximately 200 projects per year.

After obtaining a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (1989), John went on to earn a Master’s Degree in Acoustics from the University of California, Los Angeles. At UCLA he worked on the link between acoustical energy and listener reaction to sound within auditoria. Since his consultant career began at Veneklasen Associates in 1989, John has published over 100 technical papers. He teaches and lectures internationally, presenting at the last fourteen meetings of the Acoustical Society of America (ASA). In November

6.A.k
Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: Veneklasen Noise Impact Assessment 05.27.2020 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp Veneklasen Associates KFA, LLP; Santa Monica, CA
Carlthorp Property Line Noise; VA Project No.3055-046
May 27, 2020; Page 2 of 7
www.veneklasen.com
2009 he was appointed to ASA’s Technical Committee on Architectural Acoustics, and in 2013 John was further recognized in the field as a full Member of the ASA. In June of 2018, John became a Fellow of the Acoustical Society of America with citing the following: “For contribution to quantification and understanding of building response to sound and impact.”

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This study was conducted to assess the potential acoustical impact of the support space changes proposed to the Carlthorp campus, a private non-profit K-6 school that has been operating in this multifamily neighborhood since 1941. Veneklasen’s scope of work included (A) measuring the exterior noise levels currently occurring at the site, (B) calculating future conditions assuming the proposed outdoor improvements and (C) developing method(s), if any, required to reduce the future exterior sound levels to comport with the applicable Municipal Code requirements for residential districts of the City of Santa Monica.

The Support Space Improvements proposed for Carlthorp campus include the following: relocating the playset and court areas of the current outdoor playground to a new roof above classrooms at the rear of the property, expanding the ground level Playturf area, enclosing the plastic blue-tented unenclosed lunch area (while constructing new administrative offices above), and expanding the subterranean multi-purpose room under a portion of the Playturf along San Vicente Boulevard. Of these, the play court area on the roof has the potential to disturb adjacent residential neighbors due to noise from outdoor exercises, school events and playtime by the supervised elementary students (Grades K-6) who will be using it from 8 am to 5:30 pm, Monday through Friday.

Figure 1: Campus Views Current (left) and Future (right) The school campus is surrounded by residential buildings to the east (3-story condominium), west (2-story apartment building), and south (single family homes along the north side of Georgina Avenue across the 20’- wide alley (Georgina Place) behind the school). The city considers residential uses as noise sensitive receptors. The campus fronts on the 130’ wide San Vicente Boulevard and center median to the north.

2.0 NOISE THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Santa Monica Municipal Code section 4.12.060 states that the allowable noise level in Noise Zone I is 60 dBA for a 15-minute period during the hours of 7 AM to 10 PM Monday through Friday, unless the ambient noise conditions are higher. There is a 5-dBA penalty for noises consisting of speech or music, which would apply here to the elementary play court. For a maximum event, or instantaneous noise, the noise limit increases by 20 dBA above the specified threshold.

6.A.k
Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: Veneklasen Noise Impact Assessment 05.27.2020 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp Veneklasen Associates KFA, LLP; Santa Monica, CA
Carlthorp Property Line Noise
Veneklasen Project No. 3055-046
May 27, 2020; Page 3 of 7
www.veneklasen.com
Therefore, the noise limit for playground noise impacting residential neighbors is 55 dBA for continuous noise and 75 dBA for instantaneous sounds. For this playground, the sound generated is expected to be a combination of verbal communication and balls bouncing off of surfaces. The school also has an outdoor speaker system. Two speakers face one another in the school’s interior courtyard; those speakers are used for a brief morning greeting from the school administrator on school days before classes begin. The remainder of the exterior speakers will be used only in the event of emergencies and are not relevant to this study.

3.0 ACOUSTIC MEASUREMENTS
Veneklasen measured existing outdoor playground conditions, the ambient conditions, and the PA system.

On November 6, 2019, Veneklasen measured existing playground conditions at the outdoor play areas for a continuous period of 40 minutes, which included lunch hour with outdoor playtime, encompassing two playgroups, 5th and 3rd grades followed by 6th and 4th grades. The continuous 15-minutes average for the entire playground was 76 dBA, with loudest events of 90-94 dBA measured directly with no barriers or other attenuation measures.

The noise level on the turf playfield is lower due to the open environment, foliage, and soft artificial turf groundcover, on average 72 dBA and 86-90 dBA events. Any acoustical difference in the surface, between a prior natural grass field and the current artificial turf would be negligible and generally not acoustically detectable. A minimum detectable change for exterior noise is 3 dBA and the difference between these two surfaces would be less than 3 dBA.

On November 1, 2019, Veneklasen measured the ambient conditions in the alley behind the school, which represents the closest property lines to the roof-playground area, was 44 dBA for a 15-minute period during lunchtime. Traffic noise in the alley/Georgina Place is limited, as it only serves parking spaces on the backside of the school and single and multi-family residential buildings. Since the ambient sound measured is currently below the exterior noise level allowed for residential districts of 60 dBA; the reduced 55 dBA threshold for school-related activities remains the criteria per the City Municipal Code.

On May 4, 2020, Veneklasen measured the PA system on the grounds of the school, using a news podcast broadcast over the system. The current system consists of three sets of two small wall-mounted loudspeakers. One set faces west over the current playground and is rarely used (Existing Field Zone), one set is on either side of the current lunch area and will be removed with the enclosure of the lunchroom (Existing Tables Zone), and the third set is on either side of the current basketball court (Existing Court Zone); the latter two are used for morning announcements only, with all in attendance on the court. Figure 2 displays these sound zones. Each set can be activated independently. All three were active during testing.

6.A.k
Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: Veneklasen Noise Impact Assessment 05.27.2020 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp Veneklasen Associates KFA, LLP; Santa Monica, CA
Carlthorp Property Line Noise
Veneklasen Project No. 3055-046
May 27, 2020; Page 4 of 7
www.veneklasen.com
Figure 2: Sound Zones
The Tables and Court Zones ranged from 50 – 70 dBA on the court during the podcast, depending on the newscaster inflections and distance from the loudspeaker; the levels were communicated to be at a typical volume. The average noise level was 60 dBA and the loudest events were 72 dBA measured directly with no barriers or other attenuation measures.

At the time of the morning announcements, the students are not at play, so the sound level is not elevated above 55 dBA and 75 dBA, which is within the limits of the Municipal Code.

Figure 3: Rooftop Playground Speakers

6.A.k
Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: Veneklasen Noise Impact Assessment 05.27.2020 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp Veneklasen Associates KFA, LLP; Santa Monica, CA
Carlthorp Property Line Noise
Veneklasen Project No. 3055-046
May 27, 2020; Page 5 of 7
www.veneklasen.com

4.0 ENCLOSURE AND SURFACE ANALYSIS
Upper Area
The proposed rooftop play court area will have a continuous 8 foot high perimeter enclosure for safety.

When a plexiglass panel is modeled, not an open fence, it will act as a barrier for noise in addition to its safety function. Based on computer modelling, this barrier, combined with distance from the play court to the nearest residential uses, will provide suitable noise reduction to the nearby receivers including noise from the surface. Our analysis indicates absorptive panels are not required to ensure that the noise limits established by the Municipal Code for residential zones are not exceeded.

Our quantitative analysis is depicted below in Figure 4 along with the proposed plexiglass detail show in Figure 5. Sound level prediction detail is presented in Table 1: calibrated for distance from noise source and difference in elevation. Elevations match the elevations on the drawings provided by KFA Architects as closely as possible.

Figure 4: Analysis Process
Receiver 3 (condo
3 rd floor) @ 133 ft
elevation, distance
from source 45 ft
Source Area @ 126 ft elevation
Receiver 2
(apartment 2nd
floor) @ 123 ft
elevation, distance
from source 30 ft
Receiver 1 (standing person) @ 106 ft
elevation, distance from source 40 ft
Barrier around Play Court
Source Area @ 103 ft elevation
Receiver 4
(apartment 2nd
floor) @ 123 ft
elevation, distance
from source 20 ft

6.A.k
Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: Veneklasen Noise Impact Assessment 05.27.2020 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp Veneklasen Associates KFA, LLP; Santa Monica, CA
Carlthorp Property Line Noise
Veneklasen Project No. 3055-046
May 27, 2020; Page 6 of 7
www.veneklasen.com
Figure 5: Proposed Plexiglass Detail
Table 1: Upper Enclosure Analysis (Typical Activity)
Receiver Barrier Height/Elevation Calculated Level,
dBA
Code Limit,
dBA Compliance?
1 8 ft / 132 ft
34 avg / 51 max
55 avg / 75 max
Yes / Yes
2 40 avg / 57 max Yes / Yes
3 44 avg / 61 max Yes / Yes
With the barrier as shown and including 2 layers of plexiglass, all calculated average and maximum noise levels from activities on the proposed rooftop play court would be well within the noise limits of the Municipal Code under typical activity.

Field Area
For the field, the surrounding conditions remain. In 2000, the surface of the playfield was changed from natural grass to artificial turf, which does not produce a calculable noise effect at the property line.

Therefore, the field conditions did not alter the noise at the property line. The calculation to the property line is shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Field Analysis
Receiver Calculated Level,
dBA
Code Limit,
dBA Compliance?
4 (typical activity) 54 avg / 71 max 55 avg / 75 max Yes / Yes

6.A.k
Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: Veneklasen Noise Impact Assessment 05.27.2020 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp Veneklasen Associates KFA, LLP; Santa Monica, CA
Carlthorp Property Line Noise
Veneklasen Project No. 3055-046
May 27, 2020; Page 7 of 7
www.veneklasen.com

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on our analysis, a minimum solid parapet barrier as shown in Figure 4 of 8 feet around the perimeter of the rooftop play court area is recommended; Veneklasen understands that such a parapet wall is currently planned. The parapet wall can be any solid material 2 pounds per square foot (such as stucco or wood). The proposed detail shown in Figure 5 for intermittent transparency is acoustically acceptable as long as there are 2 layers of plexiglass installed; any openings for water drainage are recommended to flow interior to the campus. The plexiglass panel will be approved in the submittal process.

Based on our analysis, absorptive panels such as https://kineticsnoise.com/knp/perforated-metal-panels.html could be incorporated into the design of the play court walls, but are not required to remain below the noise limits established by the Municipal Code for residential districts such as this location.

6.0 CONCLUSIONS
Veneklasen analyzed the potential noise impact of the proposed play areas on adjacent sensitive receptors.

Analysis included noise from children’s activity and use of loudspeaker (PA) system. The Santa Monica Noise Ordinance was used to assess impact and calculate compliance. Veneklasen measured the existing ambient noise level, the sound level with the presence of children playing outdoors during typical recess and PA system use. This recess activity and PA system use constitutes comparable conditions to the proposed play areas, except that the rooftop location is elevated which establishes greater distance from most of the sensitive receptors. This collected data was then used to construct a computer model assessing the noise level of the proposed play areas at the sensitive receptors on the east, west and south. The field areas comply with the Code requirements, while the rooftop play court should be compliant if surrounded with the 8 foot high barrier of intermittent transparent plexiglass panel having two layers with detailing shown in Figure 5.

Based on study, with such a perimeter wall, the noise levels predicted for the rooftop play court area will not exceed the noise limits of Santa Monica Noise Ordinance at all sensitive receptor residential locations. In Veneklasen’s professional opinion the incorporation of a described barrier that is 8 feet tall will ensure full compliance with the residential limits imposed by the Santa Monica Noise Ordinance.

Please feel free to contact us with any follow up questions or comments.

Respectfully submitted,
John LoVerde, FASA
Principal

6.A.k
Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: Veneklasen Noise Impact Assessment 05.27.2020 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp From: [email protected]
To: Regina Szilak
Subject: Carlthorp School
Date: Sunday, February 27, 2022 9:35:35 AM

EXTERNAL
In regards to the recent notice of expansion, when will the parking garage be restored for parking if ever? The residents were not notified of the change as it appears to be used for parties. I assume the employees park on nearby streets.

Sincerely,
Fred Alexander
[email protected]

6.A.l
Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: Public Correspondence February 22 - March 8 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp From: Vernice Hankins
To: Regina Szilak
Subject: FW: Carlthorp School Appeal 20ENT-0275
Date: Monday, March 7, 2022 3:16:05 PM
-----Original Message-----
From: Paige Segal <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 7, 2022 3:09 PM
To: councilmtgitems <[email protected]>
Subject: Carlthorp School Appeal 20ENT-0275

EXTERNAL
To Whom It May Concern,
I oppose the expansion of the Carlthorp School. This causes a lot of disruption in the lives of the fellows who live here. I live directly across the street from Carlthorp, 425 San Vicente Blvd. For some, the noise alone is a huge issue. For me, it’s the parking. The expansion of the school, means a bigger staff, and less space to fit all our cars. I live with my husband and my child. Circling the block several times to find a spot near my house is a huge issue.

Please spot this plan for moving forward.

Thank you for your time,
Paige Segal
819.970.1487

6.A.l
Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: Public Correspondence February 22 - March 8 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp From: Vernice Hankins
To: Regina Szilak
Subject: FW: Carlthorp School Appeal
Date: Friday, March 4, 2022 10:48:33 AM
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Brecht <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 9:05 PM
To: councilmtgitems <[email protected]>
Subject: Carlthorp School Appeal

EXTERNAL
City Council,
I am writing to urge you to uphold the appeal against Carlthorp School’s expansion. As a ten year resident of San Vicente Blvd., I can attest to the fact that the quality of life in our neighborhood is significantly lower when the school is in session. Given their existing impact on the neighborhood, the idea that the school would expand further is ludicrous. It is troubling to me that city staff would recommend this expansion.

Specific issues which will impact your constituents in this neighborhood:
- A multipurpose room which will be used for events will bring more traffic, less parking, and more noise. - A rooftop basketball court will exacerbate the school’s existing noise pollution. They are installing double pane windows on their school to mitigate the noise they experience in classrooms. - Years of commercial construction will take place in the middle of an R1 Zone The school already presents numerous issues which should be curtailed:
- The school has 30 parking spots and 80 staff. Staff of the school take spots away from residents, forcing us to park far away from our homes.
- The school produces constant noise throughout the day. It can be heard in every room of my home. It is difficult to work from home. It is difficult to have peace in my home. Please come to San Vicente during a school day and hear it for yourselves.
- Student pick-up and drop-off cause dangerous traffic situations and even greater parking issues.

This school has a history of bad-faith expansions. They should not be able to expand further.

This school reduces your constituents’ quality of life. Their impact on the Historic San Vicente district should be investigated by the city.

Thank You,
Jeff Brecht
415 San Vicente Blvd

6.A.l
Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: Public Correspondence February 22 - March 8 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp From: Vernice Hankins
To: Regina Szilak
Subject: FW: Carlthorp School Expansion & Rooftop Playcourt.

Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 3:08:07 PM
From: Jim Robertson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 12:53 PM
To: councilmtgitems <[email protected]>
Subject: Carlthorp School Expansion & Rooftop Playcourt.

EXTERNAL
My name is Jim Robertson and I live next door to the school in unit #306. I oppose expansion of the school in this quiet residential area and in particular oppose the proposed rooftop playcourt.

Almost every day I go to my rooftop community patio for prayer, quiet meditation, and relaxation. A ROOFTOP PLAYCOURT would be very disturbing and a huge overreach.

Thank you for hearing my comment and request,
Jim
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.aboriginalskills.com
Phone: (310)395-0943

6.A.l
Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: Public Correspondence February 22 - March 8 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp From: Jim Robertson <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 6:01 PM
To: councilmtgitems <[email protected]>
Subject: Carlthorp School addition (Carlthorp School Appeal).

EXTERNAL
Dear Council,
This is Jim Robertson, resident of 446 San Vicente Bl, Unit #306, Santa Monica (directly next door to carlthorp school).

I am opposed to the expansion that Carlthorp School proposes (gymnasium on roof, etc.) We already have excessive noise from the school yard and I'm amazed that they still use speaker amplification for some of their outdoor events in such a small area. I find it quite intrusive.

Placing a gymnasium on the roof would certainly magnify this noise and greatly intrude upon the peace, quiet, comfort, and enjoyment of our homes. In other words our homes would become a less healthy place to live.

Thank you for listening to me.

Respectfully.

Jim
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.aboriginalskills.com
Phone: (310)395-0943
From: Jim Robertson <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 9:02 PM
To: councilmtgitems <[email protected]>
Subject: Carlthorp school expansion.

EXTERNAL
Dear Council,
This is Jim Robertson again resident of 446 San Vicente Bl. Here's a little addition to my prior comment.

My parents were the very first tenants of 446 San Vicente (directly next door to Carlthorp School). They moved here in 1961 and lived here until the day they died. I visited them often. Approximately 1985 my mother asked me to move in with her because she needed assistance and I stayed with her until the day she died in 2001and continue to live here.

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente I've been living here in this same unit for thirty seven years and I think it's good for you to know that I'm quite familiar with the unwelcome noise levels coming from Carlthorp school, and am opposed to this expansion plan that would surely increase the disturbing noise (due to basketball court on roof, etc.).

Thank you for listening,
Jim
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.aboriginalskills.com
Phone: (310)395-0943
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2022 8:55 AM
To: councilmtgitems <[email protected]>
Subject: Appeal 20ENT-0275 Carlthorp School-438 San Vicente Blvd.

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
In regards to the above appeal please advise who approved and what authority, without a resident hearing, the blocking off of the existing alley entrance entire parking area for other than parking purposes. It is not that I object however this appears to be a violation of the parking requirement for the school.

Has another area been designated by the city and will accommodate all the employee parking? Sincerely,
Fred Alexander
502 San Vicente Blvd.

[email protected]
From: Jim Robertson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2022 11:58 PM
To: councilmtgitems <[email protected]>
Subject: City Clerk Re: Carlthorp School Appeal

EXTERNAL
This is Jim Robertson, age 82, long time resident (almost forty years) of 446 San Vicente Bl., Unit #306, submitting another comment regarding the Carlthorp School expansion plans.

Please understand that although maintaining a peaceful, quiet, harmonious, healthy place to live for myself and my neighbors is a high priority for me, this does not mean that the welfare of the children isn't also a very high priority for me. After all, this is why for over 20 years I've been volunteering for

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente State Parks, National Parks, and other parks, taking groups of school children of all ages into our mother nature (almost every week), teaching the kids ancient aboriginal, indigenous, ancestral skills.

Of course I care deeply about all children, but this does not mean that they need a gym with a basketball court on the roof of the school that is so very close to its neighbors. The noise would be too much. A gym underneath the ground floor would be a much more reasonable option.

Thank you for listening.

Jim
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.aboriginalskills.com
Phone: (310)395-0943
-----Original Message-----
From: s saez <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2022 8:35 AM
To: councilmtgitems <[email protected]>
Subject: Carlthorp expansion objection

EXTERNAL
Hello I am an owner of a condo on 502 San Vicente Blvd and I object to the expansion of the school They already have traffic lined up daily with cars that disturbs the neighborhood and now they want to expand. They have been in noncompliance with a parking lot classrooms setup that is very noisy Scott Saez.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 1:26 PM
To: Regina Szilak <[email protected]>; councilmtgitems <[email protected]>; Gleam Davis <[email protected]>; Phil Brock <[email protected]>; Christine Parra <[email protected]>; Lana Negrete <[email protected]>; Sue Himmelrich <[email protected]>; Kristin McCowan <[email protected]>; Oscar de la Torre <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Appeal of Carlthorp Expansion--20ENT-0275

EXTERNAL

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente Janeice Schwartz
446 San Vicente Blvd., Unit 105
Santa Monica, California 90402
Dear Council Members,
My name is Janeice Schwartz and I have had the good fortune of living at 446 San Vicente Blvd. #105, since March of 1996.

When I purchased my unit, I had a beautiful panoramic view from my balcony on the first floor of an undeveloped grassy, green field. I was told that the school was planning to make this area a soccer field. Unfortunately, that is not what came to pass. Classrooms were constructed where I was told the soccer field was to be located. I accepted this. I was working at the time as an elementary school teacher, and actually did not have the time to object. As time progressed, very tall trees were planted on the property line. Since I live on the first floor, the trees blocked the sunlight I receive in my front room area. Then, the school placed a storage area beneath my master bedroom window. These school improvements have not enhanced the aesthetic appeal of my home.

I am sure the school is not aware of the resulting negative impact their improvements have generated for their residential neighbors. We have tried to be good neighbors, but this new proposed expansion will effect our quality of life for five summers and further add to the noise we endure every school day. It will make it difficult to get to and from our underground garage, as the alley will be filled with workers and their equipment. It is already difficult with sanitation trucks and contractors working in different buildings.

One of my greatest fears is the resulting rodent problem that will inevitably occur when the digging begins for the proposed multipurpose room. The rats can easily climb on the gigantic trees and gain access to our balconies.

If the expansion were to occur, our daily lives would be further affected by the school. Our building's residents are primarily retired or still working from home, as a residual effect of the pandemic. The noise during the school day is very overwhelming at certain times of the day. I can't imagine what the level of noise will be with an addition of an open-air basketball court! If this expansion results in an increase in enrollment in future years, traffic will be even a greater issue than it is at the present time. Our open area sunroof would be out of commission for five summers, during the construction.

As I mentioned before, the population of our building is primarily older, many with health concerns. I myself have asthma and the dust and pollutants from the proposed project will be detrimental to my health. I do not have central-air in my unit, so I must have open windows during the summer months.

Other residents also do not have central-air. The noise pollution from the project will be a significant deterrent to our enjoyment of our homes, during this project. That could lead to major stress and negatively impact us physically, emotionally and mentally.

Also, a long term consequence of this proposed expansion will most likely result in lower property values for our units. This would be very sad for twenty-two units! Please approve this appeal AN DO NOT approve this expansion.

I definitely support the appeal.

Janeice Schwartz
446 San Vicente Blvd., Unit 105, Santa Monica, California 90402

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 8:07 AM
To: councilmtgitems <[email protected]>
Subject: Carlthorp School

EXTERNAL
Kindly see the attached petition. We do not need 5 years of construction noise, dust, alley/parking congestion, etc. If built a basketball court on the rooftop will be especially noisy for the neighbors.

Sincerely,
Fred Alexander
502 San Vicente Blvd.

From: Eli Lester <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2022 12:15 PM
To: [email protected]; Gleam Davis <[email protected]>; Phil Brock <[email protected]>; Christine Parra <[email protected]>; Lana Negrete <[email protected]>; Sue Himmelrich <[email protected]>; Kristin McCowan <[email protected]>; Oscar de la Torre <[email protected]>
Cc: councilmtgitems <[email protected]>
Subject: Carlthorp School Appeal 20ENT-0275

EXTERNAL
Frank and Jean Lester March 27, 2022 446 San Vicente
Blvd., Unit 201
Santa Monica, California 90402
To the esteemed members of the Santa Monica City Council; We are sending you this letter (in the body of the email and attached as a pdf) in advance of the meeting on 4/12/2022, in which the Carlthorp School planned expansion will be discussed. We oppose this project as proposed, and we wish to support the Appeal 20ENT-0275 properly, following the correct procedures and protocols. To that end, we are also separately sending a copy to the City Clerk Please verify receipt of our letter. Thank you.

Frank and Jean Lester

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente 446 San Vicente Blvd. Unit 201,
Santa Monica, CA 90402
To: City Clerk Re: Carlthorp School Appeal
1685 Main Street, Room102, Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Appeal 20ENT-0275
As resident homeowners who have lived within 10 feet of the Carlthorp School for 27 years, we have reasonable and serious concerns about the proposed expansion of the school. Our issues are based on the actual history of how we have been impacted by previous Conditional Use Permit (CUP) expansion requests, which after approval, resulted in violations of the conditions included in the CUP.

I am 80 years old and my wife is 85. In the past we have been quiet and cooperative with previous expanded use requests without knowing how the actual uses would get modified over time by the school. We are concerned about our wellbeing, our health, and the comfortable use of our home without constant disturbance. We are sure that founders of the Carlthorp School never meant to cause the disruption of peace and harmony in our neighborhood, but at this point, our peace and the quiet enjoyment of our home is at the mercy of Carlthorp School and the City of Santa Monica. This time, the expansion is way too much and much to our detriment.

That which we have personally observed is as follows;
1 Gradually increasing congestion and interrupted traffic flow at, and around the school. Reduced unfettered access to public streets, public alley ways and private driveways on residential streets. Impeding the safe transition of northbound public traffic attempting to turn right onto San Vicente Blvd.
2 Trees planted at the property line which were not to exceed 16 feet in height, have grown way beyond that and now block out the sun to residents adjacent to the trees. 3 Gradually increasing noise levels from the school as enrollments increased over time In addition to the practical experiences of previous expansion work right outside my windows, and seeing first-hand how usage has changed, we have reviewed hundreds of pages of the history of how the school has received approvals for certain conditional expansion exceptions to the zoning laws in this residential area, only to expand beyond those conditions. After examining this latest requesting for yet further conditional expansion, I see no mechanisms for preventing or remedying excessive expanded use, if once again they go beyond initially granted use exceptions. How will it be different this time? This is no ‘minor’ modification. Creating a huge elevated playground within a few feet of residential units is unquestionably bad judgement and without consideration for the neighbors quiet enjoyment of their homes, and will certainly interfere with anyone who works from home or is a writer. 1 While no “technical” increases in the number of “classrooms” are contained in this application, the eventual use of the newly created space and structural modifications for instructional and learning purposes, with minor adjustments, could easily accommodate an increase in enrollment at a future time. By not using the term “classroom”, the request avoids the need for providing additional parking as well as other required conditional use issues.

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente 2 The construction process, not withstanding, both the general and periodic noise levels created by adding second story recreational space only a few feet from our building, is outrageous.

There are no guarantee, even with an audio analysis, that the future sound levels, depending on actual use, will not be disturbing to neighbors to the east, the west, and the south of the school. 3 During the protracted construction time, we and our neighbors will be subjected to; a. Continual exposure to dust, debris and pollutants
b. Repeated excess noise, especially “down wind” of the project c. Disrupted access to and from our parking garage through the alley d. Restricted use of our rooftop lounge areas during work being done e. Inability to safely open windows in the summertime for ventilation f. Older owners are very concerned about their health and wellbeing. g. This project, as planned, could potentially cause mental, physical and spiritual damages. h. Great distress and discomfort to residents near the school.

Some of the fallout of having the expanded school right next to us is; 1 A long term negative impact of the market value of our homes 2 Permanently reduced enjoyment and quiet use of our home 3 Continued and perhaps increased disruptive traffic congestion 4 Anything but harmonious operations
Major question;
If not to eventually increase enrollment, then why spend so much time and money to embark on such a huge three to five year development project in spite of the overt objections of so many residents close to the school?
We are not in favor of this project going forward, and we support the Appeal 100% FRANK LESTER 3/27/2022
JEAN LESTER 3/27/2022
446 SAN VICENTE BLVD., UNIT 201, SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90402 From: Jennifer Kramer <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 8, 2022 3:36 PM
To: Regina Szilak <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Appeal 20ENT-0275 Carlthorp

EXTERNAL
Hi Regina,
I see this bounced back when I sent it to you so not sure if you got it.

Thank you!
Jennifer Kramer

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente ---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Jennifer Kramer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 11:46 AM
Subject: Appeal 20ENT-0275 Carlthorp
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>
Jennifer Kramer April 8, 2022
446 San Vicente Blvd Unit 104
Santa Monica CA 90402
To: City Clerk Re: Carlthorp School Appeal
1685 Main Street, Room 102, Santa Monica, CA 90401
Re: Appeal 20ENT-0275
I have lived next door to Carlthorp Elementary School for the past 12 years and I am against the proposed expansion of the school. I am 48 years old and also own a brick and mortar business on Broadway in Santa Monica. That I own a business AND a condo here in Santa Monica leads me to be extremely invested in and involved with my community.

I’m concerned that my (and my neighbors') well being and overall enjoyment of life here in the Santa Monica area is being constantly challenged due to the disruptions going on next door at Carlthorp. What was once a pride point (how lucky am I to live next to such a quality high-end, exquisite and established education center?!) is now turning into a deflating and overwhelming feeling of unfortunate circumstances.

There is constant traffic and congestion in and around the school on the corner of 4th and San Vicente every morning and every afternoon when school lets out. This traffic and congestion loops way around the corner on the block of Georgina, sometimes all the way down to 7th Street. It’s a mess and I see all of us who live here struggling to access our once peaceful and smooth public city streets. Cars are honking, people are upset, and there is no way to pass along the narrow and quaint 4th street. This congestion is gradually getting worse, as enrollment increases.

If the new proposed open-air roof with basketball court and gym classes happen, this will:
• Devalue my home
• Increase congestion and flow of traffic on our beautiful quaint streets

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente • Elevated amounts of excess outdoor noise, bouncing basketballs, etc • Construction will up to 5 years of peaceful summers away (dust, debris, noise, pollutants, trucks, privacy of our roof deck, etc)
I am in favor of making a community stronger and better. While adding additional parking and tripling the playground of the school next door will be great for the school, I wonder if you might put more thought into what happens to the COMMUNITY around it should that happen. Had the proposition been to move the school to a new location (if they truly needed more space), or keep the enrollment where it is to sustain a cohesive and harmonious operation within itself and the community is resides in, or *at a minimum* (I feel I’m stating the obvious but needs to be mentioned): why would they decide to only do construction in the summer if not to avoid having themselves inconvenienced with the noise, pollutants, traffic, etc and yet all those living around the school, THE COMMUNITY, is at the mercy? That doesn’t feel amicable or peaceful.

The proposed development next door at Carlthorp will directly impact my enjoyment of living in my home and I am NOT in favor of this project being approved. I support the appeal.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Kramer
--

JENNIFER KRAMER

CLINICAL DIRECTOR

EXTERNAL
Janeice Schwartz
446 San Vicente Blvd., Unit 105
Santa Monica, California 90402
Dear Council Members,
My name is Janeice Schwartz and I have had the good fortune of living at 446 San Vicente Blvd. #105, since March of 1996.

When I purchased my unit, I had a beautiful panoramic view from my balcony on the first floor of an undeveloped grassy, green field. I was told that the school was planning to make this area a soccer field. Unfortunately, that is not what came to pass. Classrooms were constructed where I was told the soccer field was to be located. I accepted this. I was working at the time as an elementary school teacher, and actually did not have the time to object. As time progressed, very tall trees were planted on the property line. Since I live on the first floor, the trees blocked the sunlight I receive in my front room

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente area. Then, the school placed a storage area beneath my master bedroom window. These school improvements have not enhanced the aesthetic appeal of my home.

I am sure the school is not aware of the resulting negative impact their improvements have generated for their residential neighbors. We have tried to be good neighbors, but this new proposed expansion will effect our quality of life for five summers and further add to the noise we endure every school day. It will make it difficult to get to and from our underground garage, as the alley will be filled with workers and their equipment. It is already difficult with sanitation trucks and contractors working in different buildings.

One of my greatest fears is the resulting rodent problem that will inevitably occur when the digging begins for the proposed multipurpose room. The rats can easily climb on the gigantic trees and gain access to our balconies.

If the expansion were to occur, our daily lives would be further affected by the school. Our building's residents are primarily retired or still working from home, as a residual effect of the pandemic. The noise during the school day is very overwhelming at certain times of the day. I can't imagine what the level of noise will be with an addition of an open-air basketball court! If this expansion results in an increase in enrollment in future years, traffic will be even a greater issue than it is at the present time. Our open area sunroof would be out of commission for five summers, during the construction.

As I mentioned before, the population of our building is primarily older, many with health concerns. I myself have asthma and the dust and pollutants from the proposed project will be detrimental to my health. I do not have central-air in my unit, so I must have open windows during the summer months.

Other residents also do not have central-air. The noise pollution from the project will be a significant deterrent to our enjoyment of our homes, during this project. That could lead to major stress and negatively impact us physically, emotionally and mentally.

Also, a long term consequence of this proposed expansion will most likely result in lower property values for our units. This would be very sad for twenty-two units! Please approve this appeal AN DO NOT approve this expansion.

I definitely support the appeal.

Janeice Schwartz
From: Corin Nelson <[email protected]>
Subject: Appeal 20ENT-0275 in advance of 4/12/22 mtg re: Carlthorp planned expansion Date: April 3, 2022 at 4:03:45 PM PDT
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Cc: Frank Salcedo <[email protected]>, Frank Lester <[email protected]>, Tony Barsocchini <[email protected]>, Carmen Piccini <[email protected]>, Danielle Litak <[email protected]>, John Nockleby <[email protected]>, Tammy Starr <[email protected]>, Sandy Savett <[email protected]>, Venke Blyberg <[email protected]>, Janeice Schwartz <[email protected]>, Corin Nelson <[email protected]>, mary ling <[email protected]>, Jennifer Kramer <[email protected]> Good Afternoon to our esteemed members of the Santa Moncia City CouncilI’m sending you this letter (in the body of the email and attached as a pdf) in advance of the meeting on 4/12/22 in which the Carlthorp School planned expansion will be discussed. I oppose the project of

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente course though I wish to do so properly, following the correct procedures and protocols. So, please just let me know if this is ok or I should send my letter elsewhere? Also can you let us know what time the mtg is on 4/12? We have been told 5:30 and 6:30 by different people Thanks so very muchCorin Nelson
446 San Vicente Blvd. Unit 304,
Santa Monica, CA 90402
To: City Clerk Re: Carlthorp School Appeal
1685 Main Street, Room102, Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Appeal 20ENT-0275
April 3, 2022
My name is Corin Nelson. As a resident homeowner who has lived within 10 feet of the Carlthorp School for 15 years, I have reasonable and serious concerns about the proposed expansion of the school. I bought this condo at 446 San Vicente largely because of the peace and quiet of the neighborhood community which was to be welcome respite from my daily work in television. However, my only objection to living here through the years has been the increasing noise coming from the school, the traffic issues because of it and, also the rats that found their way to our condo from the school when it was tented a few years ago. I certainly never would have bought a condo next to a school that had plans to grow vertically with an open-air roof with basketball games, gym classes which will also likely be the site of school parties for the kids and parents – that will devalue my home and take 3-5 years of my peaceful summers away from me with massive construction for expansion going on.

I can’t imagine why should the City Council approve a plan that so drastically undermines the quality of life of people in the neighborhood? As a neighbor of the school, I have been already impacted by previous Conditional Use Permit (CUP) expansion requests, which after approval, resulted in violations of the conditions included in the CUP. I’m sure that founders of the Carlthorp School never meant to cause the disruption of peace and harmony in my neighborhood, but at this point, my peace and the quiet enjoyment of my home has been left up to Carlthorp School and the City of Santa Monica.

Here are just a few of my concerns with this project:
• Noise, dirt, demolition, building, trucks, construction for 3 - 5 years? That’s insane. Just because they don’t want to inconvenience the school during the school year so they’ll just do it in the summer? They think that 5 summers of us having to live next to a huge construction site is ok? No it is not ok. The dust, debris, noise, pollutants, trucks, privacy of our roof deck, west façade and windows destroyed – unbearable. This project will impact me and my neighbors mentally, physically and spiritually. There is nothing harmonious about the way the school or its desire to grow has been harmonious. They did not even attempt any community outreach to see what their neighbors’ concerns were about the project and try to offer solutions or compromises. It is not ok.

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente • There has already been gradually increasing congestion and interrupted traffic flow at, and around the school. This will only get much worse with the project at hand. Reduced unfettered access to public streets, public alley ways and private driveways on residential streets. Plus, the trucks and disruption will affect the safety of northbound public traffic attempting to turn right onto San Vicente Blvd. As it is, no one can park on this street or even pull up to our building easily during school hours – it was not that way when I moved in here.
• Trees planted at the property line between our condo and Carlthorp which were not to exceed 16 feet in height, have grown way beyond that and now block out the sun to residents adjacent to the trees.
• There has already been increasing noise levels from the school as enrollments have increased over time and with this expansion it will be unbearable. What was the number of students enrolled 5 years ago? What is it today? What do they project it will be in 5 years when they finish construction? • The new project suggests an unregulated and excessive expansion of use. The school does not seemingly currently abide by any rules or consideration of what is appropriate usage of their grounds. It’s like the school dominates this end of San Vicente and we all just live with it.
• The value of our homes will decrease greatly. At 446 SV, I currently own a little condo by the beach but with this expansion, it’s more like I will own an apartment in the center of town. What could have been described as a “peaceful beach community condo” becomes “a busy, bustling, active, noisy condo conveniently located next to one of the wealthiest schools around” – with open-air basketballs games, 2 flights up and 25 feet from our windows. It's comical when I read that previous sentence back to myself because it is so absurd! To be clear – this project will have a long-term negative impact of the market value of my home. • If you see the letter I have attached from Dorothy Menzies (who was the Head of The School until recently)she promised in 1986 “…the enrollment of Carlthorp school will not increase… and due to the size of the playground, there will be positively no increase in the future.” So now they’re tripling the playground and one would assume then that they plan to have many more students (hence their need for the proposed underground parking garage). At what point does the school realize that their ambitions for the school have outgrown the spot they are in. Instead of expanding vertically and adding a new floor beneath and a new floor on the top of the existing building, why don’t they consider moving the school entirely?.

I am 100% not in favor of this project being approved, and I support the Appeal Corin Nelson
446 SAN VICENTE BLVD., UNIT 304, SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90402 446 San Vicente Blvd., Unit 105, Santa Monica, California 90402

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 963 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente Dear Mayor Himmelrich and Distinguished Members of the City Council, My name is Audrey Lohara, and I am a sixth grade student at Carlthorp. I have been a Carlthorp student since 2015 and the school has been integral to my growth and development scholastically, socially, and as a person. I have been so grateful for the opportunity to attend Carlthorp School and hope to share with you what I feel makes Carlthorp such a special place and what it has meant to me.

It has been a privilege to be a part of a warm and intimate school community that provides the best academics, the best teachers, and the best activities to create a well-rounded experience. I started Kindergarten as a shy and curious child and Carlthorp has helped me to find and use my voice confidently. Over the years, I have participated in student council, I was one of the leads in the school’s 'Alice in Wonderland' production, I have played on the girls' volleyball and basketball teams, I have been on the debate team and I am the editor in chief of the literary magazine. Thanks to Carlthorp, I have gained important skills in leadership, a strong work ethic, and responsibility that will help me for the rest of my life. Without a doubt, I can confidently say that Carlthorp has prepared me with the best foundation for future success.

I feel that the proposed enhancements to the campus would update and improve the school for years to come, especially a genuine multipurpose room and a brand new, expanded playing field. Having another multipurpose room at Carlthorp would allow the school to host more theatrical and musical performances and give more space to families and guests who could attend in comfort. Also, a multipurpose room would benefit student assemblies, gatherings, and other significant school capacities. Numerous other public and private schools in Santa Monica have multipurpose rooms or halls, so I think that Carlthorp should have one as well.

Another play space at Carlthorp would greatly help the students and school community. A bigger play space would assist students with pursuing their athletic interests and create plenty of room for multiple sports to be played at once. I know from individual experience how challenging it is when students on the yard want to partake in various sports like volleyball, basketball, and football, yet there simply isn't enough room to accommodate everyone. A bigger playspace would permit all students to participate in their preferred game or movement. Having adequate outdoor space would also help to prevent mishaps and accidents with less crowding. The new play space would also encourage students to get more exercise, take needed breaks outside, and promote lifelong fitness.

As I am getting ready to graduate, I am thankful for all that Carlthorp has provided me - a strong educational foundation and some of my happiest elementary school memories. What I want most is to see the school’s continued success for future years. The proposed improvements to Carlthorp School will enhance a greater feeling of community spirit, provide a more secure climate for all, and permit students to pursue their interests and thrive.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Respectfully,
Audrey Lohara
`
My name is Jason Lee. I am 10 years old and in fourth grade. I love Carlthorp School because of the teachers, classes, and fun time with my friends. My favorite subjects in school are math, reading, and current news

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 964 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente events. I also love playing sports for Carlthorp. I play football, basketball, and soccer.

The teachers at Carlthorp are so kind, encouraging, and helpful. They make it worthwhile to spend my time at Carlthorp. My current teachers are Mr. Burwick and Ms. Schwarts. They are both amazing teachers, and they help me so much.

Carlthorp is an amazing school. The school is special because of the Code of Conduct, which emphasizes kindness, good citizenship, and community service. Our students are growing to be the next leaders in the community.

Sadly, sometimes there are issues because of the limited amount of space we have in the campus. I love playing sports, but the playground that we can play in is sometimes too small for some of these games. I was playing four square the other day, and I bumped into my friend because there wasn’t enough space! It would be most helpful for you to allow us to improve our playground area.

Another reason why allowing Carlthorp to improve their campus is because the multipurpose room is too small for the whole school. I know this because when I performed for the Talent Show in the MPR, the room was so crowded that I couldn't see my parents cheering me on. They were actually in the outside hallway. I got really nervous and didn’t want to perform. My little sister is in the talent show this year. I hope there is enough room for my parents to see her act.

It would also be so helpful if our lunch area was covered so that we could use it even if the weather is not great. Right now, we are eating lunch in the parking lot. Carlthorp has done a good job of trying to make it a good space, but it’s still a parking lot.

Compared to other similar schools, our campus is dramatically smaller. It would be very helpful to the students of Carlthorp for you to let us improve our campus so we can make better use of the space that we have. The impact to the students, larger community, and the future would be huge. So please, please, let us improve our campus to benefit the students and the community!
Sincerely,
Jason Lee

6.A.m
Packet Pg. 965 Attachment: comments post Feburary 2022 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente

PROPOSED ROOFTOP CHILDREN'S
PLAY COURT (OPEN AIR) +126'-6"

GEORGINA PL

TRASH &

RECYCLING
10' - 2"

CENTER LINE OF ALLEY
R1 DISTRICT

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

REAR YARDSETBACK

WIDTH OF ALLEY
20' - 0"
15' - 0" MIN
25' - 0" MIN
BUILDING LINE TO R1 DISTRICT
R2 DISTRICTR2 DISTRICT
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
6/8/20 1:05:18 PM
1/8" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
EX 03

SITE PLAN ALLEY

SETBACKS

05.18.20 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
1/8" = 1'-0"
1 SITE PLAN

ZONING PLAN
NTS
2 6.A.n
Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: Carlthorp School play court 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San 6236 SF

EXISTING FLOOR AREA
2537 SF

EXISTING FLOOR AREA
4728 SF

EXISTING FLOOR AREA
8608 SF

EXISTING FLOOR AREA
770 SF

EXISTING FLOOR AREA
6925 SF

EXISTING FLOOR AREA
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
5/12/2020 4:50:58 PM
1/16" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
EX 01

EXISTING LOWER

LEVEL & MAIN

LEVEL AREA PLAN

05.12.20 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
1/16" = 1'-0"
2 (E) GROUND/SECONDFLOOR AREA PLAN
1/16" = 1'-0"
1 (E) BASEMENT/GROUND FLOOR AREA PLAN

EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR AREA
Level AREA (SF)
(E) LOWER LEVEL 16303
(E) MAIN LEVEL 13501
(E) UPPER LEVEL 8593
GRAND TOTAL 38397

EXISTING FLOOR

AREA PLANS

6.A.o
Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: Carlthorp School FLOOR AREA 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) 8593 SF

EXISTING FLOOR AREA
SHEET
SHEET
DATE
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
5/12/2020 4:50:59 PM
1/16" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
EX 02

EXISTING UPPER

LEVEL AREA PLAN

05.12.20 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
1/16" = 1'-0"
1 (E)SECONDFLOOR/ROOF AREA PLAN

EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR AREA
Level AREA (SF)
(E) LOWER LEVEL 16303
(E) MAIN LEVEL 13501
(E) UPPER LEVEL 8593
GRAND TOTAL 38397

EXISTING FLOOR

AREA PLANS

6.A.o
Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: Carlthorp School FLOOR AREA 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

BASEMENT FLOOR
+97'-3"

BASEMENT FLOOR
+97'-3"

UPPER BASEMENT FLOOR
+101'-6"

FOOTPRINT OF NEW

CONSTRUCTION ABOVE
PL
1 17
2 18
3 19
4 20
5 21
6 22
7 23
8 24
9 25
10 26
11 27
12 28
13 14
30 15
31 16
32 LOWER BASEMENT FLOOR
+89'-8"

LOWER BASEMENT FLOOR
+89'-8"4' - 0"
3' - 8"

BASEMENT LEVEL (ABOVE)
+97'-3"
STAGE
+91'-8"
NEW

MULTI-PURPOSE RM

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR

TIERED SEATING
PARKING - 32 STALLS

STORAGE

CLASSROOM -

BREAK OUT ROOM

CLASSROOM -

SPANISH

EXISTING CLASSROOM/

MULTI-PURPOSE RM

CLASSROOM -
MATH

READING
P.E. OFFICE
PL
(ASSIGNED TANDEM PARKING

TO FACULTY/STAFF)

STORAGE

FACILITIES
OFFICE

MAIN POWER

SHUT OFF
ELEV

ROOM SERVER
ROOM
STOR
STOR

FACULTY
LOUNGE
STOR
+91'-8"
8' - 1"
BIKE STORAGE - 8 SPACES
5' - 0"
HVO
65' - 6"
75' - 11"
22' - 9"
118' - 11"

EXISTING READING ROOM

TO BE CONVERTED TO

RESTROOM/SHOWERS

PROPOSED STAIR

AND PARTITION

CORRIDOR
19 20
21 22
11' - 3"

NEW PROPOSED FLOOR AREA
** FOR PURPOSES OF CEQA EXEMPTION
GROUND FLOOR:

ENCLOSED LUNCH SEATING = 936 SF
NEW GROUND FLOOR CORRIDOR = 706 SF
TOTAL NEW GROUND FLOOR AREA = 1,642 SF
SECOND FLOOR:

NEW ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES = 845 SF
TOTAL NEW PROPOSED FLOOR AREA:
( < 25% OF EXISTING FLOOR AREA)
EXISTING # OF CLASSROOMS = 22
PROPOSED # OF CLASSROOMS = NO CHANGE
TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA: 38,397 SF
13,501 SF
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS:

EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS:

GROUND/SECOND FLOOR:
** COVERED PARKING INCLUDED IN

EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATION
TOTAL NEW PROPOSED FLOOR AREA =

18.95% OF TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA
7,280 SF

EXISTING FLOOR AREA
BASEMENT/GROUND FLOOR: 16,303 SF **
SECOND FLOOR: 8,593 SF
BASEMENT:

NEW SECOND MULTI - PURPOSE ROOM = 3,819 SF
NEW BASEMENT CORRIDOR = 974 SF
TOTAL NEW BASEMENT FLOOR AREA = 4,793 SF
SHEET
NUMBER:

SHEET
TITLE:

DATE
:
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
:
4/20/2022 2:38:58 PM
As indicatedCARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A120-FA

BASEMENT/GROUND

FLOOR PLAN -

FLOOR AREA

04.20.22 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 BASEMENT & GROUND FLOOR PLAN - FLOOR AREA

DIAGRAM
N

6.A.o
Packet Pg. 969 Attachment: Carlthorp School FLOOR AREA 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) DN
DN
DN
DN

UP UP DN
DNDN
UP

NEW ENCLOSURE OF EXISTING

LUNCH SEATING AND/OR

ADDITIONAL OFFICE SPACE

OUTLINE OF MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM

BELOW GRADE

OUTLINE OF ELEVATED

COURT ABOVE

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR
PL

ARTIFICIAL TURF

PLAYFIELD
21' - 1"

HANDICAPPED PARKING HANDICAPPED PARKING PLANTER

BIKE RACK

GATE ENTRANCE

FLAGPOLE
HEDGE
HEDGE

CLASSROOM -

SCIENCE

CLASSROOM -
4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
2ND GRADE

CLASSROOM -
2ND GRADE

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

RECEPTION/

FRONT OFFICE

BOARDROOM

KITCHEN

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN

CL OF ALLEY
1 2 3
4 5
6 13 12 11 10 9 8 7

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR

NEW PROPOSED FLOOR AREA
** FOR PURPOSES OF CEQA EXEMPTION
GROUND FLOOR:

ENCLOSED LUNCH SEATING = 936 SF
NEW GROUND FLOOR CORRIDOR = 706 SF
TOTAL NEW GROUND FLOOR AREA = 1,642 SF
SECOND FLOOR:

NEW ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES = 845 SF
TOTAL NEW PROPOSED FLOOR AREA:
( < 25% OF EXISTING FLOOR AREA)
EXISTING # OF CLASSROOMS = 22
PROPOSED # OF CLASSROOMS = NO CHANGE
TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA: 38,397 SF
13,501 SF
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS:

EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS:

GROUND/SECOND FLOOR:
** COVERED PARKING INCLUDED IN

EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATION
TOTAL NEW PROPOSED FLOOR AREA =

18.95% OF TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA
7,280 SF

EXISTING FLOOR AREA
BASEMENT/GROUND FLOOR: 16,303 SF **
SECOND FLOOR: 8,593 SF
BASEMENT:

NEW SECOND MULTI - PURPOSE ROOM = 3,819 SF
NEW BASEMENT CORRIDOR = 974 SF
TOTAL NEW BASEMENT FLOOR AREA = 4,793 SF
SHEET
NUMBER:

SHEET
TITLE:

DATE
:
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE
:
4/20/2022 2:38:58 PM
As indicatedCARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A121-FA

GROUND/SECOND

FLOOR PLAN -

FLOOR AREA

04.20.22 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 GROUND & 2ND FLOOR PLAN - FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM
N

6.A.o
Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: Carlthorp School FLOOR AREA 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) DN

NEW ROOFTOP

CHILDREN'S PLAY COURT
(OPEN AIR)
+126'-6"

SECOND FLOOR
+119'-6"
+119'-6"
+126'-6"
NEW
ADMIN

OFFICES
NEW

ELEVATOR
PL

LIBRARY

CLASSROOM -

COMPUTER LAB

OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE

CLASSROOM -

ART ROOM

CLASSROOM -

READING
ROOM

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE

NEW STAIR
14 15
16 17
18 LUNCH
AREA
PORCH

TRELLIS
NEW

ELEVATOR

NEW PROPOSED FLOOR AREA
** FOR PURPOSES OF CEQA EXEMPTION
GROUND FLOOR:

ENCLOSED LUNCH SEATING = 936 SF
NEW GROUND FLOOR CORRIDOR = 706 SF
TOTAL NEW GROUND FLOOR AREA = 1,642 SF
SECOND FLOOR:

NEW ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES = 845 SF
TOTAL NEW PROPOSED FLOOR AREA:
( < 25% OF EXISTING FLOOR AREA)
EXISTING # OF CLASSROOMS = 22
PROPOSED # OF CLASSROOMS = NO CHANGE
TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA: 38,397 SF
13,501 SF
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS:

EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS:

GROUND/SECOND FLOOR:
** COVERED PARKING INCLUDED IN

EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATION
TOTAL NEW PROPOSED FLOOR AREA =

18.95% OF TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA
7,280 SF

EXISTING FLOOR AREA
BASEMENT/GROUND FLOOR: 16,303 SF **
SECOND FLOOR: 8,593 SF
BASEMENT:

NEW SECOND MULTI - PURPOSE ROOM = 3,819 SF
NEW BASEMENT CORRIDOR = 974 SF
TOTAL NEW BASEMENT FLOOR AREA = 4,793 SF
SHEET
NUMBER:

SHEET
TITLE:

DATE :
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE :
4/20/2022 2:38:59 PM
As indicatedCARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A122-FA
2ND FLOOR/ROOF

PLAN - FLOOR
AREA

04.20.22 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
3/32" = 1'-0"
1 2ND FLOOR AND ROOF PLAN - FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM
N

6.A.o
Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: Carlthorp School FLOOR AREA 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

BASEMENT FLOOR
+97'-3"

BASEMENT FLOOR
+97'-3"
PL

LOWER BASEMENT FLOOR
+89'-8"

LOWER BASEMENT FLOOR
+89'-8"
3' - 8"

BASEMENT LEVEL (ABOVE)
+97'-3"
STAGE
+91'-8"

NEW MULTI-PURPOSE RM
NEW

ELEVATOR

TIERED SEATING

STORAGE

CLASSROOM -

BREAK OUT ROOM

CLASSROOM -

SPANISH

EXISTING CLASSROOM/

MULTI-PURPOSE RM

CLASSROOM -
MATH

READING
P.E. OFFICE
PL

STORAGE

FACILITIES
OFFICE

MAIN POWER

SHUT OFF
ELEV

ROOM SERVER
ROOM
STOR
STOR

RESTROOMS

FACULTY
LOUNGE
STOR
+91'-8"
5' - 0"
HVO

EXISTING READING ROOM

TO BE CONVERTED TO

RESTROOMS

NEW STAIR AND

PARTITION

CORRIDOR
1 A300-B/C
1 A300-B/C
3 A300-B/C 3
A300-B/C
2 A300-B/C 2
A300-B/C
SHEET
NUMBER:

SHEET
TITLE:

DATE :
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE :
4/20/2022 2:21:47 PM
3/32" = 1'-0" CARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A120-B

BASEMENT PLAN -
PARCEL

COVERAGE

04.20.22 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS
* BASEMENT AREAS DO NOT

CONTRIBUTE TO THE PARCEL
COVERAGE CALCULATION. COLORED

AREAS ARE COUNTED ON GROUND
FLOOR PARCEL COVERAGE.

SEE SECTION DRAWING A300-B/C FOR

AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE AND

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LEVELS

THIS AREA COUNTS TOWARDS FIRST

FLOOR PARCEL COVERAGE

6.A.p
Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: Carlthorp School PARCEL COVERAGE AND FLOOR DIAGRAMS 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) UP
DN
DNDN
UP

NEW ENCLOSURE

OF EXISTING

LUNCH SEATING
AND/OR

ADDITIONAL

OFFICE SPACE

OUTLINE OF MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM

BELOW GRADE

HANDICAPPED PARKING HANDICAPPED PARKING

BIKE RACK
HEDGE

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
6TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -

KINDERGARTEN

CL OF ALLEY
1 A300-B/C
1 A300-B/C
3 A300-B/C 3
A300-B/C
2 A300-B/C 2
A300-B/C

EXISTING

PARKING CLASSROOM

CLASSROOM PORCH
NEW

ELEVATOR
NEW

ELEVATOR

CLASSROOM PORCH EXCLUDED

FROM PARCEL COVERAGE PER
SMMC 9.04.100 (F)

CLASSROOM PORCH EXCLUDED

FROM PARCEL COVERAGE PER
SMMC 9.04.100 (F)

READING
P.E. OFFICE

FACILITIES
OFFICE
ELEV

ROOM SERVER
ROOM

RESTROOMS

FACULTY
LOUNGE

EXISTING
MULTIPURPOSE
ROOM
NEW PARCEL COVERAGE:

NEW ENCLOSED LUNCH SEATING = 936 SF
TOTAL NEW GROUND FLOOR PARCEL COVERAGE = 2,462 SF
NEW ELEVATORS = 278 SF

EXISTING GROUND FLOOR
PARCEL COVERAGE:

PARCEL COVERAGE CALCULATIONS
TOTAL PARCEL AREA FROM SURVEY:

GROUND FLOOR:

EXISTING PARCEL COVERAGE: 18,536 SF
TOTAL GROUND FLOOR PARCEL COVERAGE:

EXISTING = 18,536 SF
TOTAL (EXISTING + NEW) = 20,998 SF
NEW = 2,462 SF

NEW GROUND FLOOR
PARCEL COVERAGE:

TOTAL GROUND FLOOR
PARCEL COVERAGE:
(EXISTING + NEW)
18,536 SF
(39.98 % OF PARCEL AREA)
46,362.50 SF
2,462 SF
(5.31 % OF PARCEL AREA)
20,998 SF
(45.29 % OF PARCEL AREA)

FOR PURPOSES OF CODE COMPLIANCE
AREA UNDER PLAYCOURT = 1,138 SF
NEW STAIR = 110 SF

TOTAL ALLOWABLE (BY CODE)
GROUND FLOOR PARCEL COVERAGE:
20,863.13 SF
(45% OF PARCEL AREA)

TOTAL PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR

PARCEL COVERAGE ALLOWED BASED
ON MINOR MODIFICATION INCREASE:
20,998 SF
(45.29 % OF PARCEL AREA)
SHEET
NUMBER:

SHEET
TITLE:

DATE :
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE :
4/20/2022 2:21:49 PM
As indicatedCARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A121-B

GROUND FLOOR

PLAN - PARCEL

COVERAGE

04.20.22 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS

6.A.p
Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: Carlthorp School PARCEL COVERAGE AND FLOOR DIAGRAMS 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins)) +119'-6"
NEW
ADMIN

OFFICES
NEW

ELEVATOR
NEW

ELEVATOR
PL

LIBRARY

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
5TH GRADE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE

NEW STAIR
1 A300-B/C
1 A300-B/C
3 A300-B/C 3
A300-B/C

SCIENCE CLASSROOM -
4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
4TH GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
3RD GRADE

CLASSROOM -
2ND GRADE

OVERHANG OF ROOFTOP

PLAY COURT ABOVE
2 A300-B/C 2
A300-B/C

SEE FIRST FLOOR /

MAIN LEVEL PLAN ON
SHEET A121-B

THIS PORTION OF STAIR

EXCLUDED FROM PARCEL
COVERAGE PER SMMC 9.04.100 (G)
LUNCH AREA PORCH TRELLIS EXCLUDED FROM PARCEL COVERAGE PER SMMC 9.04.100 (E)

THIS PORTION OF

CORRIDOR WALL IS OPEN

CLASSROOM -
2ND GRADE
(LOWERED

FLOOR IN

THIS AREA)
UP DN

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

CLASSROOM -
1ST GRADE

RECEPTION/

FRONT OFFICE

BOARDROOM

KITCHEN FOR PURPOSES OF CODE COMPLIANCE

PARCEL COVERAGE CALCULATIONS
TOTAL NEW UPPER LEVEL PARCEL COVERAGE = 1,260 SF
NEW ELEVATORS = 290 SF
NEW ADMIN OFFICES = 250 SF
SECOND FLOOR:

NEW PARCEL COVERAGE:

EXISTING PARCEL COVERAGE: 17,631 SF
TOTAL UPPER LEVEL PARCEL COVERAGE:

EXISTING = 17,631 SF
TOTAL (EXISTING + NEW) = 18,891 SF
NEW = 1,260 SF
AREA UNDER PLAYCOURT = 720 SF

TOTAL ALLOWABLE (BY CODE)
GROUND FLOOR PARCEL COVERAGE:
20,863.13 SF
(45% OF PARCEL AREA)
18,898 SF
(90% OF GROUND

FLOOR PARCEL AREA)

TOTAL PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR

PARCEL COVERAGE ALLOWED BASED
ON MINOR MODIFICATION INCREASE:
20,998 SF
(49.29 % OF PARCEL AREA)
TOTAL PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR PARCEL

COVERAGE ALLOWED BASED ON
MINOR MODIFICATION INCREASE:
18,895 SF
( < 90% OF GROUND

FLOOR PARCEL AREA)
TOTAL 2ND FLOOR PARCEL COVERAGE
(EXISTING + NEW):

SHEET
NUMBER:

SHEET
TITLE:

DATE :
3573 HAYDEN AVENUE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
310.399.7975
KFALOSANGELES.COM
SCALE :
4/20/2022 2:21:53 PM
As indicatedCARLTHORP SCHOOL
438 SAN VICENTE BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90402
A122-B

SECOND FLOOR

PLAN - PARCEL

COVERAGE

04.20.22 SUPPORT SPACE IMPROVEMENTS

THIS AREA COUNTS TOWARDS FIRST

FLOOR PARCEL COVERAGE

6.A.p
Packet Pg. 974 Attachment: Carlthorp School PARCEL COVERAGE AND FLOOR DIAGRAMS 5.10.22 (5012 : Appeal Planning Commission CUP and Modification for Carlthorp School, 438 San Vicente (75 mins))

NEW ROOFTOP

CHILDREN'S PLAY COURT
(OPEN AIR)
+126'-6"

EXISTING ROOF
PL
1 A300-B/C
1 A300-B/C
3 A300-B/C 3
A300-B/C
2 A300-B/C 2
A300-B/C
NEW