Agenda packet — Santa Monica City Council, June 21, 2022 (part 4 of 4)

8.B.j
Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: Appendix F SSI Table Clean June 2022 (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) F-63 City of Santa Monica 2021-2029 Housing Element
Category Consolidated
Site Address Parcel No. Zoning District
Land
Area Existing Use Building Age ILR Optional Information 1 S 825 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282010013 GC 7,491 Toyota dealership 1951 0.01 pending project 48 units (825 Santa Monica) 1 S 825 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282010014 GC 7,502 Toyota dealership 1951 0.00 pending project 48 units (825 Santa Monica) 1 1211 12TH ST 4282005053 R3 15,008 one story apartment buildings 0.00 approved 13 units 1 1434 14TH ST 4282022027 R3 7,500 1925 0.22 approved 6 unit condos 1 1021 GRANT ST 4284015017 R2 6,491 1928 0.42 approved 2 units 1 1133 OCEAN AVE 4292028001 OT 190,963 Miramar Hotel 1938 0.53 approved Miramar Project - 60 condo units 1 1431 COLORADO AVE 4282034009 MUBL 22,485 one-story marble store 1923 0.01 pending 50 unit project 1 129 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4291014024 BC 30,000 parking lot 1871 0.02 pending Ocean Avenue project - 100 units 1 610 CALIFORNIA AVE 4292005022 R2 5,002 1912 0.21 approved 3 condo units 1 OCEAN FRONT
WALK/BAY STREET 4289025005 OF 23,222 vacant parking lot next to Casa del mar hotel 0.00 approved with 1828 ocean ave; formerly 1921 OFW (22 units) 1 OCEAN FRONT
WALK/PICO BLVD 4290020045 OF 45,314 parking lot 0.00 approved 83 unit project 1 1840 17TH ST 4283032008 R2 7,490 1955 0.25 5 unit condos 1 1121 22ND ST 4276005022 R2 6,114 1924 0.03 approved 3 townhomes 1 SANTA MONICA
BLVD/23RD STREET 4275006026 HMU 6,242 parking lot owned by Saint John's 0.00 pending Providence Saint John's Master Plan - 10 Units 1 1318 LINCOLN BLVD 4291008025 LT 15,003 parking lot 0.00 approved 43 unit project 1 1665 APPIAN WAY 4290018018 R3 4,430 residential 1914 0.37 pending 3 Unit townhome project 1 4268010017 MUC 64,297 one-story light industrial/creative office 0.00 approved 183 unit project - WS project 1 2102 5TH ST 4289010006 OP2 5,661 1911 0.02 3 unit condos 1 1754 10TH ST 4283018002 R2 7,511 1922 0.25 approved 3 apartment units 1 1649 CENTINELA AVE 4268006016 R2 6,313 single family dwelling 1948 0.25 approved 3 condo units 1 436 PIER AVE 4287027065 OP2 7,480 1911 0.25 3 unit condos 1 1900 20TH ST 4274019056 R2 7,575 single family dwelling 0.00 approved 3 condo units 1 4287003017 OP2 7,973 0.00 3 unit condos
1 1707 CLOVERFIELD
BLVD 4268014013 BTV 76,562 parking lot of Extra Space sotrage 1955 0.66 approved 63 units w/ 5 affordable 1 1342 BERKELEY ST 4267012009 R2 7,858 Vacant lot 0.00 100% affordable housing project w/ 8 units 1 1443 18TH ST 4275010016 MUBL 7,500 Vacant lot 1957 0.00 approved 11 condo units 1 711 COLORADO AVE 4291022012 TA 7,500 construction staging site 0.00 approved 100% affordable housing 1 1437 7TH ST 4291021029 NV 14,991 three story office building 1983 1.22 approved 65 unit project 1 1618 STANFORD ST 4268002005 MUC 20,016 one story office building 1950 0.20 approved 47 unit project 1 1238 7TH ST 4291006006 NV 7,500 one-story office 1912 0.00 approved 37 unit project 1 1557 7TH ST 4291022021 TA 7,500 one story brick office building 1959 0.03 approved AA project for 59 unit project 1 1427 5TH ST 4291019019 TA 15,007 one-story vacant retail building 1954 0.00 approved 92 unit project 1 1514 7TH ST 4291023002 TA 7,504 construction staging parking site 0.00 approved 100% affordable housing - 50 units 1 501 BROADWAY 4291019027 TA 15,007 one-story vacant retailer (Black tux) 0.00 approved 94 unit project 1 525 COLORADO AVE 4291024014 TA 7,483 one-story creative office 1960 0.00 approved 40 unit project 1 1437 5TH ST 4291019018 TA 7,484 parking lot 0.00 approved 52 unit project 1 1437 6TH ST 4291020016 NV 7,497 one story residence 0.00 approved 51 unit project 1 1527 17TH ST 4275012020 R2 7,500 single dwelling unit 1923 0.05 approved 3 condo units addition 1 949 10TH ST 4281025014 R2 7,484 1916 0.25 approved 3 condo units

8.B.j
Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: Appendix F SSI Table Clean June 2022 (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Appendix F | Report on Suitable Sites Inventory Analysis F-64 Category Consolidated
Site Address Parcel No. Zoning District
Land
Area Existing Use Building Age ILR Optional Information 1 1432 17TH ST 4282019007 R2 7,504 1959 0.08 approved 6 unit condos 1 918 5TH ST 4292015004 R2 7,520 1910 0.25 approved 3 condo units 1 2714 HIGHLAND AVE 4287019012 OP2 4,708 1912 0.27 approved duplex 1 1902 EUCLID ST 4283028010 R2 7,499 1940 0.23 approved triplex addition 1 2409 28TH ST 4270004017 R2 9,005 1937 0.13 approved duplex 1 1958 20TH ST 4274019001 R2 7,609 0.13 approved addition of 2 units 1 1512 EUCLID ST 4282032003 MUBL 7,500 vacant single family home 0.25 pending 10 unit project 1 2501 2ND ST 4287010011 OP2 6,478 0.08 approved 3 unit condos addition 1 1819 PICO BLVD 4274017019 NC 13,510 parking lot for religious institution 1950 0.38 approved 100% affordable housing 48 units 1 1949 17TH ST 4274015020 R2 7,747 Vacant lot 0.00 approved 5 condo units 1 2425 20TH ST 4273019001 R2 6,746 one story single family unit 1928 0.33 approved 3 condo units 1 817 16TH ST 4281001021 R2 7,481 one story single family dwelling 0.40 approved 3 condo units 1 1413 MICHIGAN AVE 4283013024 NC 17,992 Vacant lot 1905 0.07 approved 100% affordable housing (58 units) 1 1510 FRANKLIN ST 4267027057 R2 8,118 two story single family unit 1924 0.31 approved 3 unit condos 1 734 12TH ST 4280025015 NC 4,802 one story single family dwelling 1926 0.25 approved 3 condo units 1 1514 PRINCETON ST 4267022010 R2 4,999 one story single family dwelling 1940 0.25 approved 2 condo units 1 1319 CENTINELA AVE 4267014026 R2 9,274 two story single family unit 1929 0.49 approved 6 unit condos 1 1448 7TH ST 4291020008 NV 7,498 two story apartment buildings w parking lot 1952 0.07 approved 8 unit project 1 1546 9TH ST 4282028007 R3 7,503 one story single family unit 1909 0.25 pending 9 unit apartments 1 1302 6TH ST 4291010027 NV 18,521 two story office 1978 0.13 SB330 application; 80 units w/ offsite at 1333 7th 1 2537 LINCOLN BLVD 4284008016 GC 19,239 closed car wash 1965 0.17 SB330 application; 49 units w/ 5 affordable 1 2601 LINCOLN BLVD 4285001030 MUBL 203,990 one story Gelsons shopping center; multiple tenants 1956 0.35 SB330 application; 521 units w/ 53 affordable 1 1333 7TH ST 4291008018 NV 7,510 small site; single dental tenant; long standing owner/tenant 1978 1.33 SB330 application; 100% affordable receiver site of 38 units 2 AH 1353 OLYMPIC BLVD 4283008001 MUBL 10,144 Synder Diamond parking lot 0.02 expressed past interest; prominent corner 2 AH 1654 14TH ST 4283008004 MUBL 15,011 Synder Diamond 1975 0.31 expressed past interest; prominent corner 2 AH 1660 14TH ST 4283008018 MUBL 21,369 Synder Diamond 1925 1.17 expressed past interest; prominent corner 2 AN 1311 5TH ST 4291010019 NV 7,498 parking lot for retail building 1939 0.68 low scale old building Downtown; common ownership 2 AN 1313 5TH ST 4291010020 NV 7,510 one-story retail building 0.02 low scale old building Downtown; common ownership 2 BI 1519 COLORADO AVE 4282035010 MUBL 22,498 one-story creative office 1957 0.48 high potential with across st access to expo; adjacent parcel at 1544 16th St is parking lot with common ownership
2 CC 1317 WILSHIRE BLVD 4281012025 MUB 22,535 Rite Aid 1940 0.15 high potential with parking lot; underutilized site; single tenant 2 G 2848 COLORADO AVE 4268002012 MUC 11,927 one-story light industrial 1952 0.13 prior residential project withdrawn due to DA process 2 G 2878 COLORADO AVE 4268002011 MUC 18,020 one-story light industrial 1959 0.24 prior residential project withdrawn due to DA process 2 G 2902 COLORADO AVE 4268002013 MUC 82,310 one-story light industrial 1938 0.23 prior residential project withdrawn due to DA process 2 G 2912 COLORADO AVE 4268002003 MUC 9,597 one-story light industrial 1963 0.86 prior residential project withdrawn due to DA process 2 H 3025 OLYMPIC BLVD 4268010018 MUC 54,556 one-story creative office/light industrial building 0.00 large parcel; adjacent to approved development; owned by known residential developer; prior application for residential
2 1244 7TH ST 4291006007 NV 7,500 Office building with dental tenants 0.83 low scale office Downtown with parking in rear; adjacent to approved residential project on same size lot
2 1301 WILSHIRE BLVD 4281012022 MUB 60,051 Von's 1966 0.15 high potential parking; has expressed interest in past; single tenant 2 1327 5TH ST 4291010017 NV 7,497 one-story retail building 1930 0.62 low scale retail Downtown across 4th/5th Arizona; owned by housing provider; adjacent to approved residential project on same size lot 2 1401 WILSHIRE BLVD 4281011028 MUB 21,271 one-story US Bank Building with rear parking lot 1931 0.45 adjacent parking lot; not on HRI; one story single tenant bank with high potential

8.B.j
Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: Appendix F SSI Table Clean June 2022 (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) F-65 City of Santa Monica 2021-2029 Housing Element
Category Consolidated
Site Address Parcel No. Zoning District
Land
Area Existing Use Building Age ILR Optional Information 2 1501 WILSHIRE BLVD 4281005026 MUB 32,561 One story vacant retail formerly Santa Monica Town Car with large rear parking lot 1932 0.35 underutilized parking lot; fronting Wilshire Blvd with access; vacant building 2 2723 LINCOLN BLVD 4285001032 MUBL 20,599 34 Degrees North Fitness and one-story auto repair 1955 0.41 lots of parking; single story
2 625 ARIZONA AVE 4291006027 NV 22,500 one-story office building 1938 0.54 low scale office Downtown; corner lot; prior development inquiry 2 626 WILSHIRE BLVD 4291006001 NV 15,000 711 strip mall 1959 0.09 High; location on corner; with parking lot 2 2225 COLORADO AVE 4275016021 MUBL 35,990 one-story R&D (Kite Pharma) building with parking lot 1972 1.02 one-story R&D underdeveloped; kitepharma looking for new space 2 1407 7TH ST 4291021027 NV 14,993 one-story retail building 1923 0.13 low scale retail strip; multiple tenants; alley access; corner parcel 3 AS 1410 LINCOLN BLVD 4291021002 LT 7,508 parking lot 0.01 common ownership to 720 Santa Monica Blvd; owned by commercial investment company
3 AS 718 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4291021001 LT 7,497 commercial building; balloon place and common ownership 1924 0.52 low scale building at edge of DT; in proximity to other residential development; common ownership; owned by commercial investment firm 3 R 1237 LINCOLN BLVD 4282009027 LT 7,514 Motel 1907 0.13 old motel; tenant does not appear to have longetivity 3 R 1243 LINCOLN BLVD 4282009014 LT 7,502 Motel 1949 0.48 old motel; tenant does not appear to have longetivity 3 718 COLORADO AVE 4290001023 LT 21,881 former Fisher lumber site vacant 1965 0.08 vacant building; site for sale 3 603 ARIZONA AVE 4291006029 NV 7,506 one-story office building 1963 0.00 low scale office - one story; AA for residential applied for back in 2014; owned by housing developr
4 AL

MAIN STREET B/T

OCEAN PARK BLVD

AND ASHLAND AVE
4288009900 R4 12,477 City parking lot on main south of Ashland 0.00 city owned parking lot - no leases with outside parties 4 AL

MAIN STREET B/T

OCEAN PARK BLVD

AND ASHLAND AVE
4288010900 R4 16,469 City parking lot on main 0.00 city owned parking lot - no leases with outside parties 4 AL

MAIN STREET B/T

OCEAN PARK BLVD

AND ASHLAND AVE
4288011900 R3 23,118 City parking lot on main 0.00 city owned parking lot - no leases with outside parties 4 AL

MAIN STREET B/T

OCEAN PARK BLVD

AND ASHLAND AVE
4288012902 R3 26,951 City parking lot on main 0.00 city owned parking lot - no leases with outside parties 4 AL

MAIN STREET B/T

OCEAN PARK BLVD

AND ASHLAND AVE
4288013905 R3 26,348 City parking lot on main 0.00 city owned parking lot - no leases with outside parties 4 AL

MAIN STREET B/T

OCEAN PARK BLVD

AND ASHLAND AVE
4288014901 R3 40,256 City parking lot on main (approximately 11.8 Ksf) rest is affordable housing 1947 0.00 city owned parking lot - no leases with outside parties 4 AL

MAIN STREET B/T

OCEAN PARK BLVD

AND ASHLAND AVE
4288015901 R3 50,158 City parking lot on main 0.00 city owned parking lot - no leases with outside parties 4 AP 1301 4TH ST 4291011909 BC 32,245 Bank of America; Chase bank; parking lot 1959 0.00 4th/Arizona withdrawn project 4 AP 1324 5TH ST 4291011900 NV 8,977 Bank of America; Chase bank; parking lot 1980 0.00 4th/Arizona withdrawn project 4 AP 1324 5TH ST 4291011901 NV 5,989 Bank of America; Chase bank; parking lot 1980 0.00 4th/Arizona withdrawn project 4 AP 1324 5TH ST 4291011902 NV 7,520 Bank of America; Chase bank; parking lot 1980 0.00 4th/Arizona withdrawn project 4 AP 1324 5TH ST 4291011903 NV 7,480 Bank of America; Chase bank; parking lot 1980 0.00 4th/Arizona withdrawn project 4 AP 1324 5TH ST 4291011904 NV 7,520 Bank of America; Chase bank; parking lot 2013 0.00 4th/Arizona withdrawn project 4 AP 1326 5TH ST 4291011905 NV 7,481 Bank of America; Chase bank; parking lot 2013 0.00 4th/Arizona withdrawn project 4 AP 1333 4TH ST 4291011910 BC 20,244 Bank of America; Chase bank; parking lot 1961 0.00 4th/Arizona withdrawn project 4 AP 1334 5TH ST 4291011908 NV 7,508 Bank of America; Chase bank; parking lot 2013 0.00 4th/Arizona withdrawn project 4 AQ 1318 4TH ST 4291012900 BC 22,484 Parking Structure 3 0.00 RFP for affordable housing issued

8.B.j
Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: Appendix F SSI Table Clean June 2022 (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Appendix F | Report on Suitable Sites Inventory Analysis F-66 Category Consolidated
Site Address Parcel No. Zoning District
Land
Area Existing Use Building Age ILR Optional Information 4 AQ 1320 4TH STREET 4291012901 BC 7,504 Parking Structure 3 0.00 RFP for affordable housing issued 4 BQ 1217 14TH ST 4282003901 R3 7,510 public parking lot 12 behind petco 0.00 city owned parking lot - no leases with outside parties 4 BQ 1217 14TH ST 4282003900 R3 7,497 public parking lot 12 behind petco 0.00 city owned parking lot - no leases with outside parties 4 I 26TH STREET/OLYMPIC
BLVD 4268014900 CAC 540 Bergamot Arts Center 0.00 existing Bergamot Arts Center; lease agreement with arts uses; must replace groundfloor arts uses 4 I 26TH STREET/OLYMPIC
BLVD 4268013919 CAC 409,713 Bergamot Arts Center 0.00 existing Bergamot Arts Center; lease agreement with arts uses; must replace groundfloor arts uses 4 1146 16TH STREET 4281005900 R2 7,499 public parking lot 8 behind Café Zella (city owned) 0.00 city owned parking lot - no leases with outside parties 4 1217 EUCLID STREET 4282004900 R3 14,994 public parking lot 7 behind LaMonarca Bakery 0.00 city owned parking lot - no leases with outside parties 5 AB 1421 LINCOLN BLVD 4282027021 LT 7,516 parking lot for CVS pharmacy 0.00 common ownership to adjacent parcel 5 AG 4282035002 MUBL 7,482 parking lot for automotive service center building 1522-1530 Broadway 0.02 common ownership with adjacent parcel
5 AJ 3101 LINCOLN BLVD 4285036002 GC 4,820 parking lot for georges burgers 0.00 single tenant; underutilized parcel with common ownership 5 B 4267007003 MUB 4,394 New Balance store parking lot 0.00 past interest in development; common ownership with adjacent parcels 5 B 2616 WILSHIRE BLVD 4267007002 MUB 4,393 New Balance store parking lot 0.00 past interest in development; common ownership with adjacent parcels 5 BR 907 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282011033 GC 2,494 small private parking lot for auto repair and Tuesday morning 0.00 common ownership- could be developed with Tuesday Morning site 5 CJ 1453 25TH ST 4275001013 MUBL 7,002 parking lot for Helen's cycles 0.00 common ownership see 1457 25th 5 F 1547 26TH ST 4267022018 OC 8,107 parking lot for one story vacant commercial office building 0.00 common ownership - see 2601 Colorado 5 F 2615 COLORADO AVE 4267022015 OC 5,966 parking lot for one story vacant commercial office building 0.02 common ownership to 3 other parcels - see 2601 Colorado 5 K 3125 PICO BLVD 4274034023 NC 5,005 parking for closed Valentinos restaurant 0.00 common ownership with adjacent parcel; vacant building 5 M 2306 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4275005002 MUBL 7,002 parking lot for 2300 santa monica (cynergy) 0.00 common ownership with adjacent parcel; single tenant 5 N 4275009012 MUBL 7,500 parking lot for one-story to two story building with iron gym and creative office tenants 0.01 recently sold building; location on Broadway near other residential uses make it likely it will turn over; common ownership (see 1457 19th street) 5 O 4276022001 MUBL 5,229 parking lot for laundromat 0.01 common ownership with 3 adjacent parcels; corner lot 5 O 4276022004 MUBL 5,196 parking lot for auto repair 0.09 common ownership with 3 adjacent parcels; corner lot 5 U 1348 14TH ST 4282015011 GC 7,515 parking lot for Truxtons restaurant and Bar 0.01 common ownership w/ adjacent parcels (1327-1333 Santa Monica Blvd) 5 Y 1214 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282023022 GC 2,509 parking lot with vacant auto repair 1975 0.05 common ownership w/ adjacent parcel; underutilized; one story autorepair 5 Y 1218 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282023021 GC 7,504 parking lot with vacant auto repair 1925 0.11 common ownership w/ adjacent parcel; underutilized; one story autorepair 5 4268001038 BTV 38,548 Lionsgate parking lot 0.00 SCAG Helpr tool classifies this as a vacant site; owned by separate owner than Lionsgate parcel; used as Lionsgate parking
5 4283010001 MUBL 7,495 parking lot for one story vacant office building 0.00 could be developed with adjacent vacant parcel on corner 5 1541 15TH ST 4282035014 MUBL 7,510 parking lot for SM Conservatory 0.00 property owner expressed interest in 100% affordable 5 1716 BERKELEY ST 4268009019 CCS 11,703 parking lot serving underparked industrial uses 0.05 underutilized lot; medium size could be developed for affordable housing; owned by housing provider
6 AD 12TH STREET AND
BROADWAY 4282032002 MUBL 7,487 Ford auto storage parking lot 0.00 common ownership with adjacent parcel; southwest corner 6 AD 1222 BROADWAY 4282032001 MUBL 7,487 Ford auto storage parking lot 1956 0.02 common ownership with adjacent parcel; southwest corner 6 AE 1544 14TH ST 4282033010 MUBL 7,484 Paint and body shop auto storage (see 1538 14th st) 1957 0.04 common ownership with adjacent parcel used as parking lot; one story service bays 6 AF 12TH STREET AND
BROADWAY 4282033018 MUBL 4,986 Ford auto storage parking lot 0.08 common ownership with adjacent parcel; southeast corner 6 AF 12TH STREET AND
BROADWAY 4282033020 MUBL 4,992 Ford auto storage parking lot 0.06 common ownership with adjacent parcel; southeast corner 6 AF 1310 BROADWAY 4282033019 MUBL 4,987 Ford auto storage parking lot 0.07 common ownership with adjacent parcel; southeast corner

8.B.j
Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: Appendix F SSI Table Clean June 2022 (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) F-67 City of Santa Monica 2021-2029 Housing Element
Category Consolidated
Site Address Parcel No. Zoning District
Land
Area Existing Use Building Age ILR Optional Information 6 AK 2700 LINCOLN BLVD 4287017043 GC 5,609 parking lot for Big Q's auto repair - common ownership to 3 adjacent parcels 1946 0.00 for sale property; advertised for redevelopment potential; common ownership to adjacent parcel 6 AZ 3204 LINCOLN BLVD 4287032015 GC 2,014 auto repair shop parking lot 0.00 adjacent common ownership (see 3204 lincoln); one story auto with parking lot 6 AZ 3204 LINCOLN BLVD 4287032016 GC 1,521 auto repair shop parking lot 1973 0.00 adjacent common ownership (see 3204 lincoln); one story auto with parking lot 6 BB 1348 18TH ST 4276030010 GC 7,506 Honda auto storage 1977 0.00 common ownership with adjacent 2 parcels used also as parking; comprises one of many surface lots for Honda
6 BF 832 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282027003 GC 7,493 Toyota auto storage 1958 0.02 common ownership with adjacent 888 SM Blvd and R2 parcels (1418-1424 9th); offsite lot - main dealership across the street on Lincoln 6 BK 1411 17TH ST 4275011023 GC 7,500 off-site parking lot for auto storage 1921 0.25 for sale property; no common ownership but adjacent to vacant two story auto showroom building at 1710 Santa Monica
6 CB 1447 18TH ST 4275010015 MUBL 7,500 parking lot for Herman's auto repair 0.26 large site; auto storage; 3 adjacent parcels with common ownership (see 1449 18th)
6 CB 1807 BROADWAY 4275010013 MUBL 7,500 parking lot for Herman's auto repair 0.01 large site; auto storage; 3 adjacent parcels with common ownership (see 1449 18th)
6 T 1201 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282014026 GC 22,473 BMW auto storage 1969 0.08 common ownership with adjacent parcel - large separte inventory lot; main dealership is across alley at 1187 Santa Monica Blvd 6 T 1337 12TH ST 4282014016 GC 14,994 BMW auto storage 1964 0.02 common ownership with adjacent parcel - large separte inventory lot; main dealership is across alley at 1187 Santa Monica Blvd
6 W 1418 16TH ST 4282020004 GC 7,494 Lexus parking lot - used car lot/service lot 1964 0.00 lot is used to sell used cars; Main Lexus dealership is at 1501 Santa Monica Blvd; dealership may consolidate its operations
6 W 1530 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282020001 GC 7,510 Lexus parking lot - used car lot/service lot 1952 0.00 lot is used to sell used cars; Main Lexus dealership is at 1501 Santa Monica Blvd; dealership may consolidate its operations 6 W 1530 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282020002 GC 7,497 Lexus parking lot - used car lot/service lot 1952 0.00 lot is used to sell used cars; Main Lexus dealership is at 1501 Santa Monica Blvd; dealership may consolidate its operations 6 X 1308 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282022024 GC 9,711 offsite auto storage lot for Suburu 1924 0.02 in 2020 was used for Mercedes Benz; currently used for Suburu; main dealership is at 1229 Santa Monica 6 X 1415 EUCLID ST 4282022023 GC 7,499 offsite auto storage lot for Suburu 1921 0.00 in 2020 was used for Mercedes Benz; currently used for Suburu; main dealership is at 1309 Santa Monica
6 Z 1335 LINCOLN BLVD 4282010019 LT 7,482 Toyota service repair lot 0.02 common ownership with adjacent parcel 6 Z 1339 LINCOLN BLVD 4282010018 LT 7,509 Toyota auto storage - service center lot 1913 0.03 common ownership with adjacent parcel 6 1415 12TH ST 4282023025 GC 37,478 offsite overflow Ford service & repair auto storage lot 1965 0.13 off-site overflow service and lot for Ford; large parcel; mostly surface parking with service bays; owned by Real estate developer 7 AI 1901 WILSHIRE BLVD 4276008010 MUB 10,498 one-story vacant House of Billiards building 1938 0.33 vacant space; corner parcel; for sale with 1141 19th St 7 AK 2720 LINCOLN BLVD 4287017044 GC 8,022 one story Big Q's auto repair 1969 0.21 active sales; advertised for redevelopment; Common ownership to 3 adjacent parcels - see 2700 lincoln
7 BC 3307 PICO BLVD 4274036002 NC 5,015 one story retail building 1938 0.48 5000 sf small parcel size; adjacent properties 3311, 3317 Pico also being sold concurrently
7 BC 3311 PICO BLVD 4274036003 NC 2,502 one story retail building 1948 0.58 small parcel size; adjacent sites 3307, 3317 Pico being sold concurrently 7 BC 3317 PICO BLVD 4274036027 NC 6,777 one-story auto repair shop 1974 0.16 small parcel size; adjacent parcels 3307, 3311 Pico being sold concurrently 7 BD 3018 PICO BLVD 4270006041 NC 5,958 one-story retail building 1950 0.68 all 3 adjacent parcels for sale (3018-3030 Pico) 7 BD 3024 PICO BLVD 4270006042 NC 5,775 two-story apartment building 1957 0.89 all 3 adjacent parcels for sale (3018-3030 Pico) 7 BD 3026 PICO BLVD 4270006043 NC 5,579 two story commercial retail building 1955 0.88 all 3 adjacent parcels for sale (3018-3030 Pico) 7 BE 1450 20TH ST 4275009009 MUBL 22,500 Part of Big Jos burgers 0.54 for sale property; with adjacent parcels; large underutilized site 7 BE 1925 BROADWAY 4275009010 MUBL 7,500 parking lot for Big Jos burger 1957 0.42 for sale property; very undertilized site with single story tenant and large lot; advertised for redevleopment opportunity
7 N 1457 19TH ST 4275009011 MUBL 15,000 one story iron gym and creative office with parking lot (common ownership) 1948 0.28 recently sold building; location on Broadway near other residential uses make it likely it will turn over; common ownership (see 1457 19th street) 7 V 1619 1/2 SANTA
MONICA BLVD 4282018010 GC 3,212 vacant car sales lot; recently sold 1960 0.26 common ownership with adjacent parcel; recently sold 7 V 1619 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282018012 GC 4,282 vacant car sales lot; recently sold 1977 0.26 common ownership with adjacent parcel; recently sold

8.B.j
Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: Appendix F SSI Table Clean June 2022 (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Appendix F | Report on Suitable Sites Inventory Analysis F-68
Category Consolidated
Site Address Parcel No. Zoning District
Land
Area Existing Use Building Age ILR Optional Information 7 1634 20TH ST 4275025002 IC 19,662 two-story office building 1925 0.05 older building; In IC north of Olympic Boulevard adjacent to bike path; proximity to existing residential; for sale; with preassessment for affordable housing already done
7 1703 OCEAN PARK
BLVD 4273023032 NC 14,021 one
-story Burger restaurant and laundrymat 1974 0.85 one
-story multitenant retail building with large parking; corner large parcel; recently sold
7 2316 LINCOLN BLVD 4289001007 GC 14,104 one-story retail (recliner sales) building 1953 0.14 on Lincoln Boulevard with high development potential; larger parcel on corner 7 2510 PICO BLVD 4270001023 NC 18,171 car wash 1960 0.28 large parcel with access from side street; new owner indicate future residential development interest
8 AB 1411 LINCOLN BLVD 4282027029 LT 14,994 CVS pharmacy 1948 0.34 in DT; adajcent parcel is parking lot 8 AE 1323 COLORADO AVE 4282033011 MUBL 22,495 Paint and body shop 1952 0.09 location is ideal as it is located across from park; common ownership with adjacent parcels; one story service bays
8 AV 1719 WILSHIRE BLVD 4276010037 MUB 18,769 one story Enterprise car rental 0.13 one story with parking lot; common ownership with adjacent parcel at 1723 wilshire; large site
8 AW 2202 BROADWAY 4275016007 MUBL 35,989 one-story Ferguson plumbing and lighting 1950 0.28 one story single tenant light industrial; common ownership with adjacent parcel 8 AW 2218 BROADWAY 4275016005 MUBL 19,800 one-story Ferguson plumbing and lighting 1947 0.54 proximity to redeveloping residential parcels across; large sized lot 8 BF 888 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282027032 GC 15,005 Toyota auto storage 0.57 common ownership with adjacent parcel 8 CD 2711 WILSHIRE BLVD 4266016100 MUB 28,663 Chase bank building with rear parking 1977 0.32 sheer size of lot may make this property desirable for redevelopment; adjacent rear parking lot see 1135 Princeton
8L 2601 WILSHIRE BLVD 4266016054 MUB 15,365 76 gas station 0.00 large size parcel; corner; access to alley; gas station may make it undesirable to sell; common ownership with Sonny Mclean
8 1020 WILSHIRE BLVD 4282007025 MUB 17,502 one-story Belcampo restaurant building 1960 0.46 single tenant; low scale; next to Apartments.com; large parcel; could be developed with 1018 Wilshire but no common ownership
8 1025 WILSHIRE BLVD 4281027033 MUB 22,517 one-story El Cholo restaurant 1932 0.15 large parcel small restaurant; lots of parking 8 1100 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282024026 GC 14,992 Toyota preowned center 1942 0.26 large parcel; corner 8 1102 BROADWAY 4282031032 MUBL 22,486 small one story office tenants; appears mostly vacant 1975 0.45 large parcel on corner; includes parking 8 1224 5TH ST 4291004016 NV 14,986 one story office building 1962 0.20 doublewide lot 8 1234 WILSHIRE BLVD 4282005001 MUB 14,993 one-story Ulta building 1946 0.37 large lot; low scale; single tenant; corner parcel 8 1420 WILSHIRE BLVD 4282003001 MUB 29,976 one-story Audio and Video center and Bank of America 1953 0.67 corner parcel; two tenants; rear adjacent parking parcel owned by Bank of America 8 1453 14TH ST 4282021013 MUBL 22,518 one
-story building with 3 tenants, Paint lab and
small creative office 1925 0.43 low scale building; new development adjacent to north 8 1624 LINCOLN BLVD 4290001012 LT 22,288 car wash 1972 0.09 next to affordable housing; part of development trends occuring on Lincoln 8 1701 WILSHIRE BLVD 4276010035 MUB 13,497 one-story vacant Mens Warehouse 1961 0.49 single tenant is bankrupt; vacant building; alley access; corner 8 1907 WILSHIRE BLVD 4276008023 MUB 15,009 one-story restaurant (Chandi) 1966 0.31 prospective owners with interest to redevelop; single tenant; one story 8 2020 WILSHIRE BLVD 4276014025 MUB 19,574 one-story restaurant and nightclub (Opaque Restaurant and Senator Jones club) 1955 0.10 rear parcel is R2 parking lot; low scale; few tenants; could be developed in conjunction with 2030 Wilshire but no common ownership 8 2230 BROADWAY 4275016024 MUBL 21,600 one story creative office building 1948 0.41 vacant space; large parcel; single story 8 2308 BROADWAY 4275016028 MUBL 27,773 one story creative office building 1948 0.35 large lot; proximity to redeveloping residentail across 8 2411 PICO BLVD 4274006023 MUBL 17,664 one story auto repair shop 1966 0.14 large one story auto repair with parking; adjacent to residential; large parcel; single tenant
8 2520 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4275001024 MUBL 20,962 one
-story Goodwill building 1962 1.17 large parcel on corner; single tenant 8 2730 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4267020026 MUBL 28,573 one
-story AAA building 1965 0.33 access to side street; large parcel; underutilized with access to transit 8 2802 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4267019028 MUBL 14,451 one
-story office (roque and mark) building 1965 0.43 two frontages with rear parking; doublelot on corner; access to alley; single tenant

8.B.j
Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: Appendix F SSI Table Clean June 2022 (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) F-69 City of Santa Monica 2021-2029 Housing Element
Category Consolidated
Site Address Parcel No. Zoning District
Land
Area Existing Use Building Age ILR Optional Information 8 2828 WILSHIRE BLVD 4267005009 MUB 29,264 one-story commercial building, Vitamin Store and vacant restaurant space 1949 0.25 big parcel; two frontages 8 2914 WILSHIRE BLVD 4267004015 MUB 25,528 two-story LA mattress store with office 1949 0.66 one story retail with office above; multiple tenants; rear parking; larger parcel 8 2933 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4267011025 MUBL 19,147 one story Wine Expo 1948 0.18 two frontages; single tenant 8 1651 16TH ST 4283010900 MUBL 161,263 vacant SMMUSD headquarters building 1976 0.00 SMMUSD indicated interest in redeveloping for worker housing 9 BA 2800 LINCOLN BLVD 4287017045 GC 21,519 one story car wash 1961 0.19 large parcel decent size; single tenant; common ownership with parcel 4287017018
9 BR 901 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282011034 GC 15,006 one-story Tuesday Morning store 1976 0.17 large parcel; corner parcel; single tenant 9 CX 1832 FRANKLIN ST 4268011006 MUC 17,921 one story creative office 1951 0.12 owner inquiry on site history; demolition of existing building applied for recently; new ownership in LLC
9 CX 3122 NEBRASKA AVE 4268011004 MUC 20,010 one story light industrial 1950 0.32 large parcel; recently acquired with adjacent parcels with LLC 9 1724 STANFORD ST 4268003003 MUC 31,503 one story light industrial 1927 0.01 appears to be Volkswagen off site storage lot and service bays 9 1740 STANFORD ST 4268003002 MUC 29,308 one story creative office 1957 0.22 large parcel; acquired into LLC; ownership by developer 10 AE 1538 14TH ST 4282033009 MUBL 7,485 Paint and body shop 1955 0.00 common ownership with adjacent parcel; one story service bays 10 AG 1520 BROADWAY 4282035001 MUBL 7,510 one-story auto parts building 1976 0.49 common ownership with adjacent parking lot parcel; building seems to be used only for storage; corner parcel with alley access
10 AJ 3101 LINCOLN BLVD 4285036001 GC 4,749 one-story Georges burgers restaurant 1968 0.49 large parcel on corner; single tenant; common ownership with parking lot parcel
10 AV 1723 WILSHIRE BLVD 4276010025 MUB 7,500 parking lot for Enterprise Rental 1976 0.06 recently sold with 1719 Wilshire; enterprise rental 10 AZ 3204 LINCOLN BLVD 4287032014 GC 1,988 one story auto repair shops 1960 0.15 adjacent common ownership (see 3204 lincoln); one story auto with parking lot 10 BB 1719 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4276030011 GC 14,986 Honda dealership with surface inventory 1977 0.07 common ownership with adjacent 2 parcels (1344-1348 18th St); main dealership at 1337 Euclid/1301 Santa Monica Blvd 10 BJ 2624 WILSHIRE BLVD 4267007004 MUB 4,405 one-story restaurant 1932 0.15 common ownership to adjacent 2 parcels 10 BJ 2628 WILSHIRE BLVD 4267007005 MUB 4,404 one-story mathnasium and salon 1959 0.29 common ownership to adjacent 2 parcels 10 BJ 2636 WILSHIRE BLVD 4267007006 MUB 5,481 one-story mathnasium and salon 1949 0.28 common ownership to adjacent 2 parcels 10 BK 1710 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4275011025 GC 10,000 two-story vacant building 1946 0.49 vacant auto showroom with parking lot; recently sold 10 BR 911 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282011015 GC 5,004 part of Tuesday morning site 1963 0.25 common ownership to Tuesday morning parking lot site 10 CB 1449 18TH ST 4275010014 MUBL 7,500 parking lot for Herman's auto repair 0.00 large site; auto storage; 3 adjacent parcels with common ownership (see 1449 18th)
10 CJ 1457 25TH ST 4275001012 MUBL 7,002 one-story Helen's cycle 1963 0.40 one story; single tenant; with rear parking lot 10 D 3011 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4267012003 MUBL 7,187 small one story dentist 1953 0.16 common ownership with adjacent parcel developed with old office 10 D 3017 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4267012004 MUBL 7,214 two story office 1969 0.15 common ownership with adjacent parcel 10 F 2601 COLORADO AVE 4267022017 OC 6,066 one story vacant commercial building 1946 0.33 currently vacant; common ownership to 3 other adjacent parcels (see 2601 Colorado)
10 F 2615 COLORADO AVE 4267022016 OC 5,977 one-story vacant commercial building 0.35 vacant building, for lease; common ownership to 3 other parcels (see 2601 Colorado)
10 J 2008 PICO BLVD 4273003002 NC 2,497 one-story campos taco with lot 0.00 large lot with parking; common ownership; single tenant 10 J 2008 PICO BLVD 4273003001 NC 4,722 one-story campos taco with lot 1948 0.15 large lot with parking; common ownership; single tenant 10 J 2010 PICO BLVD 4273003003 NC 6,491 one-story campos taco with lot 1949 0.13 large lot with parking; common ownership; single tenant 10 K 3115 PICO BLVD 4274034031 NC 7,502 closed Valentino's restaurant 1945 0.32 common ownership with adjacent parcel; vacant building 10 L 2615 WILSHIRE BLVD 4266016055 MUB 5,508 one story bar Sonny Mcleans 1940 0.30 sonny mcleans; common ownership with adjacent 76 station 10 M 2312 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4275005020 MUBL 5,553 one-story retail store - cynergy cycle 1940 0.40 common ownership with adjacent parcel; single tenant

8.B.j
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: Appendix F SSI Table Clean June 2022 (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Appendix F | Report on Suitable Sites Inventory Analysis F-70 Category Consolidated
Site Address Parcel No. Zoning District
Land
Area Existing Use Building Age ILR Optional Information 10 O 2439 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4276022002 MUBL 5,195 one story laundromat 1948 0.32 common ownership with 3 adjacent parcels; corner lot 10 O 2445 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4276022003 MUBL 5,207 one story auto repair 1946 0.28 common ownership with 3 adjacent parcels; corner lot 10 Q 1414 18TH ST 4275011002 GC 7,500 parking for vacant Honda service repair 0.27 formerly the Honda service center at 1726 Santa Monica Blvd which has since left; large site in combination with adjacent parcel
10 Q 1726 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4275011001 GC 15,000 two-story vacant Honda service center 1976 0.28 vacant; common ownership with 3 adjacent parcels 10 U 1323 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282015013 GC 4,998 one-story Truxton restaurant and Bar 1923 0.10 common ownership with rear and adjacent parking parcel; two tenants on-site; corner parcel 10 W 1530 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282020003 GC 7,509 Lexus auto storage 1952 0.00 auto storage for service center 10 Y 1200 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4282023023 GC 4,978 parking lot with vacant auto repair 1962 0.03 common ownership w/ adjacent parcel; underutilized; one story autorepair 10 3232 SANTA MONICA
BLVD 4267015027 MUBL 13,878 one story retail building (keyboard store) 1968 0.42 single tenant; large parcel; corner lot; 11 1140 7TH ST 4292005007 R2 7,497 St Monica Church parking lot DA indicates that affordable housing shall be constructed as priority 11 1257 CENTINELA AVE 4267001016 R2 42,631 Church of Jesus Christ parking lot 1948 large parking lot 11 1343 OCEAN PARK
BLVD 4284025028 R3 25,777 Mt Olive Church with large parking 1962 has express interest; half of site is parking lot 11 3114 3RD ST 4287038027 OP2 22,603 St Clement Church parking 1956 large separate parking 11 801 WASHINGTON AVE 4281033024 R2 15,012 parking lot for Saint Pauls Lutheran Church (blank) 11 BH 925 CALIFORNIA AVE 4281029012 R2 4,993 Vintage Church trinity house parking lot 1967 double lot 11 BH 929 CALIFORNIA AVE 4281029011 R2 5,017 Vintage Church trinity house parking lot 1967 double lot 12 CN 4276012027 R2 22,500 large parking lot for Rite Aid off Pico existing parking lot in rear of retail diagonal across from Rite Aid; large size lot 12 S 4282010011 R3 7,493 parking lot for Toyota A-Lot; parking in rear of 825 SMB project 12 BA 4287017018 OP2 5,659 parking lot for car wash on lincoln 1961 common ownership to vacant car wash fronting Lincoln but zoned OP2 12 CC 1122 14TH ST 4281012024 R2 37,532 Rite aid parking lot off Wilshire common ownership to Rite Aid fronting Wilshire 12 CD 1135 PRINCETON ST 4266016045 R2 21,913 Chase Bank parking lot common ownership to Chase bank; large parcel 12 AI 1143 19TH ST 4276008009 R2 7,192 parking lot for sale; with 1901 Wilshire; common ownership 12 B 1215 26TH ST 4267007030 R2 6,377 parking lot for New balance store A-Lot; parking lot for New balance; common ownership 12 CM 1219 PRINCETON ST 4267006012 R2 6,983 parking lot for multi tenant retail A-Lot; common ownership to front wilshire parcel; Pacific Dining Car vacant restaurant
12 CN 1223 18TH ST 4276012018 R2 7,486 large parking lot for Rite Aid off Pico existing parking in rear of retail; large adjacent common ownership in front but riteaid may not leave
12 Q 1418 18TH ST 4275011003 R2 7,500 parking structure for former Honda service center service center appears to have moved; common ownership with adjacent two parcel
12 BF 1418 9TH ST 4282027004 R3 7,492 Toyota parking lot 1925 A-Lot; common ownership to 2 other parcels 12 1424 9TH ST 4282027005 R3 7,503 CVS parking lot A-Lot 12 1847 16TH ST 4283032024 R2 6,040 vacant lot undeveloped; no structures 12 528 SAN VICENTE BLVD 4293004010 R2 11,074 vacant lot undeveloped; no structures 12 621 PACIFIC ST 4289005013 OP2 5,865 vacant lot undeveloped; no structures

8.B.j
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: Appendix F SSI Table Clean June 2022 (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Clerk Mailbox
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2022 11:26 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: Housing Commission Recommendations to City Council regarding Draft Redline Revisions to the Adopted 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
From: Leonora <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2022 9:07 PM
To: Theresa Marasco <[email protected]>; leslielambert92 <[email protected]>; Council Mailbox <[email protected]>; Clerk Mailbox <[email protected]>; Planning Commission Comments <[email protected]>
Subject: Housing Commission Recommendations to City Council regarding Draft Redline Revisions to the Adopted 6th Cycle Housing Element Update

EXTERNAL
Below please find the recommendations passed by the Housing Commission on 6/16/22. - Ensure affordable housing is not just a paper exercise and obtain revenue sources to make affordable housing a reality, inclusive of increased efficiency in the current budgetary process, and more robust resources for affordable housing.
- Prioritize affordable housing in historically blue and green lined neighborhoods. - Inaction has contributed to the segregation that exists and the City should take meaningful action to physically redistribute affordable housing equitably across the city. Steps are long overdue. There are no neutral actions and the City cannot fail to act.

Leonora Camner
Housing Commissioner
On Behalf of Santa Monica Housing Commission
Item 8.B
06/21/22
1 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Item 8.B
06/21/22
2 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Item 8.B
06/21/22
3 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Item 8.B
06/21/22
4 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Item 8.B
06/21/22
5 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Item 8.B
06/21/22
6 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Item 8.B
06/21/22
7 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Item 8.B
06/21/22
8 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Item 8.B
06/21/22
9 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Item 8.B
06/21/22
10 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Item 8.B
06/21/22
11 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) Item 8.B
06/21/22
12 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) REPEAL ARTICLE 34 in the CA state constitution; USE public land for PUBLIC GOOD, end systematic housing violence & displacement. Article 34 of the CA constitution reads; “No low rent housing project shall hereafter be developed, constructed, or acquired in any manner by any state public body until, a majority of the qualified electors of the city, town or county, as the case may be..”
Localities that have been abusing their positions and segregating cities by race & class should not decide what happens to public land. Workers that commute into cities also have the right to decide what happens to public land, retirees, college students, and many others also have that right!
“Heidi Marston resigns from LASHA, citing difficulties in fulfilling LAHSA's mission without"fundamental shifts". In her resignation letter, Marston elaborates:
"Power and funding alone control homelessness. But in our current system, organizations like the one I lead, the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA), are not given control over regulatory or policy decisions, service providers remain underfunded, and dedicated front-line employees of non-profit organizations and government entities are hamstrung by rules, red tape, and bureaucracy. Marston also points to low wages, high rents, restrictive zoning laws, and other "shadow monsters'' we must tackle in order to end homelessness." https://medium.com/@hmarston2/the-homelessness-crisis-a-monster-of-our-own-maki ng-be5975399ce1
1 Item 8.B
06/21/22
13 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) Structural Governance of the Social Housing Authority
The State Housing Authority - HCD will oversee
The Social Housing Authority; Community-led development of PS, affordable, & market-rate housing: Social Housing Agencies in each county in CA (ONE SOCIAL HOUSING AGENCY with selected progressive civil peers (community advocates) assigned to offices in each part of the county (likely NSEW & Mid-City, TBD);a group of progressive housing civil peers that implements & develops new community-owned affordable, market-rate, and PS rental housing on publicly owned land throughout LA County. Communities are well put together, mostly in walkable, pedestrian/bike-friendly built communities. The agency as a collective whole will capture vacancy numbers (parking lots, buildings (privately & publicly owned), to determine ownership/best use for vacant spaces.

The Social Housing Authority will override city councils in localities to partner directly with County BOS, and HCD to collect funding meant for homeless/housing 2 Item 8.B
06/21/22
14 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) spending, money goes into ONE TRUST account that must provide RECEIPTS of where/how much money is spent on specific projects.

Agency works with HUD to implement new guidelines for affordable homeownership for the blue-collar working class. Agency maintains ONE website/database that has a list of AVAILABLE community-owned affordable, market-rate, and PS rental housing. List of AVAILABLE affordable & market-rate homeownership opportunities.

Affordable housing waitlist for rental housing should be no longer than 6 months, 6 months is actually too long but should not exceed that. The social housing agency is focused on public safety, public safety means safety from heavy traffic violence and climate arson. This means the social housing team works to build communities that are walkable, bike, and pedestrian-friendly. Communities that have access to green space.

Communities that aren’t being heavily polluted by LAPD helicopter pilots (noise & fuel pollution linked to dementia, linked to cancer). Cars belong on the outside of multi-family communities, not within. Cars are occupying too much land space! Humans need land to live on, we shouldn’t NEED to drive everywhere. Create when possible 15-20 minute cities/small communities.
3 Item 8.B
06/21/22
15 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) Social Agency is primarily focused on the development of community-owned housing. However, the agency will be divided into 3 primary teams; PSH, affordable & market-rate rentals, affordable & market-rate homeownership; Permanent Supportive Housing- PSH for residents in need of wraparound services. Services could be needed short or long-term depending on the person.

This team is focused on securing housing for residents with low-to-no income, chronically homeless, FOSTER youth (up to age 24), disabilities etc. This team doesn’t provide the services it connects other agencies & non-profits to PS housing.

This team maintains a database of PSH units that are available and works to revamp/remodel the broken shelter housing system to turn them into PSH.

Again, ONE social service housing website for residents with varying needs.

Foster Youth: safe and clean group homes that provide guidance & structure to youth/young adults up to the age of 24.

REVAMP the broken Foster System; guidance comes from social workers that are based out of the revamped DPSS, non-profits, grassroots teams, etc.).

PSH shouldn’t feel carceral (jail-prison like).
4 Item 8.B
06/21/22
16 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) Supportive services are wraparound services in QUALITY family planning, STI/STD prevention/protection, mental, behavioral, & rehabilitation healthcare, etc, etc.

Introduce UBI, money that should come from another trust account will not come from the housing trust fund. UBI for foster youth, and adult residents not working or below the poverty line. UBI up to $1000 a month for completed work/ treatment assignments.

For displaced youth; completed schooling/work/etc. Standard UBI (no work /treatment assignments required) $300-$500.

Repeating; services are provided by A REVAMPED DPSS, by grassroots and non-profit teams, etc. Agency will provide a civil peer court system; will also be for any potential cases of alleged abuse happening from workers but all workers must have ongoing training, schooling, and teachings in proper behavior when interacting with residents in PSH communities, especially foster youth! Service teams should meet every few months to go over what is and what is not working, the social housing agency does not provide the service, they are simply making available the housing needed for the residents in need of PSH, possibly in need of long term care, healing, community.

The PSH Social Housing Team works with the DPSS to secure safe parking/dwelling zones within the county until PSH becomes available. All non-profit groups/service teams need to be an extension of this department (LASHA, DPSS, Grassroot teams, etc., etc.) Service teams should be able to contact PSH social agency team to find PSH, Safe parking/dwelling, and/or to receive money for temporary hotel/room stays (FEMA MONEY should be used as the ONE trust account is mostly for development/maintenance/admin of community-owned housing. ONE TRUST per county social agency/authority).
5 Item 8.B
06/21/22
17 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) Community-Owned affordable & market-rate Housing; residents are self-sufficient, can pass a criminal background check likely just need assistance securing an affordable or market-rate unit. Will work with residents with a prior eviction. Community-owned affordable & market-rate rental housing that is always affordable. Rent shouldn’t take more than 20-30% of a resident's total income after taxes. Establish an affordable rental market-rate price for the blue-collar working class. The affordable price should not be averaged with working-class/high income earners included in the calculation. Most workers, most jobs in LA County pay about $40,000. What is the average wage for the blue-collar worker??? Community-owned, market-rate units will likely be much cheaper than privately owned market-rate.

All local city affordable housing authorities would be moved into the social agency/demolished. There are too many moving parts of the housing programs/processes. We need ONE coordinated system with FUNCTIONING non-profits, social service teams an extension of the one agency. Social workers, field workers, and rehousing specialists should be able to utilize the agency/website to secure at a minimum safe parking/safe dwelling. Should be able to give food vouchers/stamps, etc. to those that need them.

Again, the housing team is likely divided by local cities in the county, likely by NSEW & mid-city, TBD. Each of those divided teams will be divided into the 3 groups of; PSH, affordable & market-rate rentals, affordable & market-rate homeownership) Public Safety- A civil peer board of housing (court) will be established to hear cases about any potential threats to public safety happening in Socially owned housing. The court will also hear about allegations of any abuse happening within the system and 6 Item 8.B
06/21/22
18 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) correct the action. PSA on appropriate behavior will be provided to all residents/staff that are part of the social housing community.

The goal of the Social Housing agency is to prevent displacement but they will support “JUST-CAUSE” eviction for tenants posing a risk/threat to other tenants. No gang activity or violence WILL be tolerated, the community has a right to safety, if that safety is ever threatened, residents in the community have the right to evict! Some PSH will be for residents in transition from jail/prison back into community living. Prevent ROOT CAUSE of problems that we are seeing in our community. Also, consider communities for disabled residents/ residents with special needs that may need long-term wraparound services. Consider partnership with community colleges for affordable housing for students/young adults up to age 24-25. Consider committed behavioral, mental, and rehabilitation health programs for residents with outstanding issues in above mentioned. Any committed programs should still be a place of healing, not further violence and trauma. Dismantle and rebuild existing programs in that area.

Fix the problems at the ROOT, save the next generation and again, ongoing training, and schooling, for workers in this field. HIGHER pay for workers in these fields! 7 Item 8.B
06/21/22
19 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) The private housing market can always exist if it likes but residents shouldn't be forced to rely on it. There are residents whose families have been dealing with generational housing violence as it relates to race & class, they cannot rely on a privately owned market that has no accountability! Rent has gone up by over 65% within the last 10 years in LA County with no rebuttal for the blue-collar working class, retirees, residents of generational housing violence and displacement, college students, foster youth, and many many others. 8 Item 8.B
06/21/22
20 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) 9 Item 8.B
06/21/22
21 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) This social agency will have nothing to do with private housing developments but it can purchase private housing and it can assist with securing housing for residents in privately owned housing. The Social Agency will maintain a website of AVAILABLE community-owned affordable, market-rate, and PS rental housing units. Privately owned units can also be listed. <<< WATCH CYBER FRAUD/SCAMS which is rampant on apartment rental websites.

The social agency is being created to develop and implement new housing developments on vacant publicly owned land and remodels for publicly owned vacant buildings. The agency cannot deny community-owned housing developments in any neighborhood in LA County, they are a county-wide team that implements new developments of community-owned PS, affordable, and market-rate housing in ALL CITIES in the county, this includes SANTA MONICA, BEVERLY HILLS,

WEST HOLLYWOOD, MARINA DEL REY, PASADENA, DOWNEY, LONG
BEACH, etc., etc., etc., ALL CITIES IN LA COUNTY! The intentional segregation as it relates to race & class MUST end, THE NIMBY violence MUST END!
For community-owned affordable & market-rate housing, long-term residents of LA County should get priority with housing placements, focusing on getting workers closer to their jobs. It is imperative for the health of humans, the health of the Earth, and other species that we reduce drive times, and reduce pollution. Preventing displacement is IMPERATIVE. The team can prevent displacement by subsidizing rent for tenants in privately owned units and/or helping move them to community-owned affordable housing.
10 Item 8.B
06/21/22
22 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) Affordable homeownership- full proposal coming soon, introduce co-ops, CLT’s, and resell requirements. The primary focus is blue-collar workers (affordable with resell requirements) and market-rate housing. Use money from market-rate sales to place into the ONE trust account. Insert grassroots team to help with restorative justice aspects of homeownership for residents impacted by systematic racial violence.

How do you think this story is going to end?????????
Short-term rentals- introduce tourism short-term stays, money goes into the ONE trust account.

Trust Account- One trust account that will be audited by city/state controllers. Money comes from HUD, Feds, State, Donations, & HHH. The annual state surplus budget must donate a portion into trust every year. The tourism industry should be donating a portion of total earnings into the trust. The cannabis industry should be donating a portion of money into the trust, should be redirecting money to communities impacted by the “pretend war on drugs” created by the U.S Gov’t. A small portion is for admin/resident manager fees (try to avoid outsourcing resident management to other companies, which could run up costs). The largest portion of the trust is for housing development/property maintenance.) How much are CA taxpayers giving in federal dollars to other states using the money for social services (TBD). 11 Item 8.B
06/21/22
23 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) Community-owned housing cannot be sold to corporations. If TOPA is introduced, keep under CLT (land lease) to allow tenants to purchase their units but prevent corporations from being able to purchase***??? (verify). Also, any money given to nonprofits to build affordable housing should mean that that housing cannot be sold to a corporation. How and why are some non-profits that received Gov’t/Taxpayer money able to sell affordable buildings after a set number of years to private corporations? Housing would go back to the social agency OR TOPA if the non-profit wanted to be released from oversight/responsibility. The Social Agency can buy privately owned property and resell it to private owners/corporations but NOT publicly owned land/housing, not rent nor ownership. Again, community-owned developments are going to be built with the community in mind, with green space, stores, hospitals, etc., sometimes worked/developed within the communities.

Social Housing Plans ready for implementation;
https://htwws.org/santamonicaairport/
(Author notes, not part of the proposal)
-Examine the years that ADOS (American descendants of Survivors paid federal taxes but were not able to utilize public service. Examine displacement and communities that were intentionally burned t the ground by supremacists. Request reimbursement/hold percent of federal/state taxes to heal communities.
-Tenancy in common is a form of co-ownership of property in which each party owns an undivided interest that passes to his or her heirs at death. The interest is undivided 12 Item 8.B
06/21/22
24 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) because each tenant has rights in the whole property. Although ownership is in common, tenants may have equal or unequal shares.
-Joint tenancy is the joint ownership of property by two or more co-owners in which each co-owner owns an undivided portion of the property. On the death of one of the joint tenants, their interest is automatically passed to surviving tenants. -Real property- immovable property, a building, land, plants etc, (though buildings can actually be moved depending on).
-Just cause eviction in CLT - Community members causing violence when corrective action cannot be taken, not working. Racial violence & other forms of discrimination.

Peer court will recommend rehabilitation programs when permitted to do so, severe cases could result in immediate evictions.
-Land on Earth belongs to all of humanity.
-Land has not been fairly distributed to residents impacted by systematic housing violence as it relates to race & class.
-The aim of the Surplus Land Act (the "Act"); is to increase the availability of real property in California for affordable housing development by requiring the prioritization of affordable housing when selling or leasing public lands no longer necessary for agency use.
-"Feb. 5, 1866: Thaddeus Stevens Proposes Land Distribution Amendment" https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/tdih/thaddeus-stevens-freedmens-bill/ 13 Item 8.B
06/21/22
25 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) -Foster City- examine the broken foster system, keeping families together whenever possible, family planning services, safe housing & family for youth that are not able to stay with their biological families.

To do;
-Write the state bar and include them on your housing emails. REQUIRE that the state bar authorize civil peers to oversee legal issues related to housing (LLP’s). -BLM the org must redirect funding into one trust that is overseen by a group of Black civil peers. Push money back into Black communities as direct UBI payment, as housing payments, treatment payments, crime & gang prevention, etc., etc. -Email OMBW/Watch for grants (GS)
-Civilian Eminent Domain of Public Land; communities protected from Climate arson; Free market exists for those that want to be part of it. -Establish Public Bank
-A PORTION of public land MUST remain PUBLICLY owned for use by the community.
-Agency divided into NSEW & Mid-City?!?! Civil Peer teams in NSEW & Mid-City ?? -If the BOS goes ROUGE, the social agency will partner with the state housing authority directly and override county BOS should they become non-compliant. 14 Item 8.B
06/21/22
26 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) The Social Housing Authority
(created by Tieira Ryder; 4/25/22 https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/) -representcal.org, why a constitutional convention is necessary, and how the CA constitution allows localities to abuse their position, allows illegal segregation as it relates to race & class.
-Examine pre-built tiny home/ADU placements in well put together communities that are affordable & supportive. Sheds are not tiny homes. Some residents already own tiny homes or they want to, can support themselves but need land. Communities likely could be supported in the valley.
15 Item 8.B
06/21/22
27 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: HowTheWest Was Saved <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 3:43 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: 06/21/22 Santa Monica City council meeting; Comment on item 8B, Housing Element Attachments: SocialHousingAuthority.TieiraRyder.4-25-22.pdf

EXTERNAL
Hello,
We are asking HCD to support a county-led social housing team that is overseen by actual progressive housing advocates. Not much has changed in Santa Monica City's housing element and as a collective, we will NEVER get out of the housing crisis if we do not begin implementing a solid social housing policy across the entire U.S. Build more privately owned market-rate housing but residents cannot rely on a market that has proven unreliable!
The source has already granted us all permission to live on Earth.

Residents of varying "racial" & class backgrounds do not require the permission of another human to live anywhere on Earth. We must build housing in well-built communities that are walkable, bikefriendly, and affordable! The incorrectly zoned Santa Monica airport & penmar golf course MUST close in this housing cycle so that we can begin building housing surrounded by a large park! HCD, local residents are asking for your support in capturing PUBLIC land to be used for PUBLIC good. Localities that have been intentionally segregated by race & class cannot be expected to do the right thing.
https://htwws.org/social-housing-ca/
‐‐
Best,
Item 8.B
06/21/22
28 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) 2 Tieira
https://htwws.org/santamonicaairport/
https://youtu.be/WSFf00y-0uA To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

Walkable, bike-friendly communities that are affordable are the right of every single human being. These communities are great for humanity, other species, and the Earth itself! Everything in the HUE-MANS life does NOT need to be a drive away.

Item 8.B
06/21/22
29 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins))

2021-2022

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Julie Rusk, chair
John Maceri, past chair
Karen Gunn, vice chair
Jody Priselac, vice chair
Natalya Zernitskaya, secretary
Perry Roshan-Zamir, treasurer

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Gary Avrech
Sheila Banani
Tara Baraukas
Claudia Bautista-Nichols
Lindsay Call
Stephanie Cohen
Timothy Conley
Donna Gentry
Ana Maria Jara
Shawn Landres
Ashley London
Janet Gollery McKeithen
Thomas McLaughlin
Jessy Morales
Tara Pomposini
Cynthia Rose
Laura Rosenbaum
Eric Shafer
Cecilia Tovar
Nat Trives
Angel Villaseñor
Michele Wittig
Leila Youssefi
Donald Zelaya

EMERITUS BOARD MEMBERS
Debra Farmer
Misti Kerns
The Human Relations Council of Santa Monica Bay Area is a non-profit organization that promotes a culture of fair treatment, inclusion and equal access to opportunities.

P.O. Box 1307 • Santa Monica, CA 90406 -1307
:hrcsantamonica.org :humanrelationscouncilsantamonicabay June 8, 2022
Re: June 28, 2022 Council Adoption of FY 2022/23 City of Santa Monica Budget Dear Mayor, City Council and City Staff:

The Human Relations Council (HRC) of Santa Monica Bay Area is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of fair treatment, inclusion, and equal access to opportunities. As such, we are deeply committed to equitable, sustained, creative and user-friendly community engagement and public participation. • We appreciate the City Council and staff commitment to greater access for public participation in Council and Board/Commission meetings through your support for “hybrid” meetings and provision of language access services.

This includes call-in and virtual options for public comment and readily available translation and interpretation services, particularly in Spanish and Amharic. We strongly believe that enabling greater public access in these ways is one required step to further the City’s goals of becoming a more equitable and inclusive community.
• We further encourage the City Council to provide the resources needed to support the City staff-created Equity Action Plan designed to ensure increased awareness, action and improved equity outcomes across all City departments.

In summary, we eagerly anticipate implementation progress across all departments on the City’s Equity Action Plan. Genuine and sustained progress on this Plan along with support for those who may not be able to attend in-person meetings and those who may need language support are foundational for a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive Santa Monica for all. When you adopt the FY 2022/23 City budget and department priorities, please adequately fund and restate your priority for this necessary and essential work.

Thank you for your service to the people who live, work and visit Santa Monica.

On Behalf of HRC Board With Kind Regards,
Julie Rusk
Item 8.B
06/21/22
30 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Debra Shepherd <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 11:28 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 8B

EXTERNAL
Good day Councilmembers:

I'm writing to you as a 20 plus year resident of the city of Santa Monica. I am also a person with lived experience of homelessness. I am currently a participant in the housing voucher program.

I know that you have a lot of input about housing, but I don't know how much of it actually comes from people like me. I watch your meetings regularly. Most feedback comes from people, who are insulated by their privilege. They have no lived experience of struggling for basic necessities.

When a person is struggling to pay rent, or they are unhoused, it's like drowning. It's a crisis that requires extraordinary measures. For the last 20 years, I have watched people kill projects with their privilege, that would have provided hundreds of units of affordable housing. The number of required units from the state is the result of that. It's not the state of California unfairly singling out the city of Santa Monica. We earned this number. It's time for us to accept the requirement, and do whatever is necessary to meet it.

Best Regards,
Debra Shepherd
Santa Monica resident
Item 8.B
06/21/22
31 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) 2 Vernice Hankins
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 11:06 AM
To: Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 8.B: Housing Element Draft Redline Revisions

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
As these Staff‐recommended revisions are reviewed, it should be noted that the Council’s actions in complying with the over‐reaching and counter‐productive state legislation will only serve to further undermine any future challenge the City may decide to undertake. Agenda Item 8.B Housing Element Draft Redline Revisions is simply the City’s latest action of acquiescence, dating back to 2019.

This sets the stage to further undermine the community wellbeing, further ration fixed amenities such as parks, and compromise the City’s already challenged long term financial situation.

To be specific, the financial downside is amplified by the simultaneous increase in (unfunded) service and infrastructure requirements and the initiative to convert destination retail space to residential, eliminating city sales tax revenues in the process. This strategy leaves significant tax increases on existing residents as the only option.

The reality of Santa Monica’s housing capacity and history of addition Santa Monica’s has added so much housing that its current stock translated into 1.78 residents per housing unit according to the 2020 census. To place this into context, the City of Los Angeles is 46% higher at 2.61 residents per housing unit. The Statewide average of 2.75 residents per housing unit is 54% higher than Santa Monica. Santa Monica has one of the lowest levels of any city in the state.

How did Santa Monica achieve such housing abundance? Since 1960, Santa Monica has added a net 1.5 housing units for each new resident, children included. This translates into 14,795 net new housing units servicing a net population increase of 9,794.

Item 8.B
06/21/22
32 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) 3 In fact, Santa Monica kept building new housing units even in decades that experienced net declines in city population! During the 1980s and 1990s, Santa Monica had a 4,230 net decline in population. Despite that decline, the city built 1,445 net new housing units during that same period.

To be clear, that 60‐year building trend was not in response any historical overcrowding. In 1960, the average number of people per housing unit in Santa Monica was 2.23. The 2.65 in the City of Los Angeles was 19% higher than Santa Monica. The average over the entire State in 1960 was 2.88, 29% higher than Santa Monica.

Moreover, since 1980s, Santa Monica has added 4,000 affordable housing units, representing about 70% of the housing stock added since 1980 and 10% of the City’s entire current multi‐ family housing stock.

Despite this housing abundance reality, the Council has yet to seriously challenge the arbitrary and onerous state allocations.

The state‐defined shortage in Santa Monica relates to residents, NOT housing.

To be clear, Santa Monica does not have a shortage of housing. According to the arbitrary RHNA process that this item relates to, the State has actually deemed that Santa Monica has a shortage of new residents.

By definition, any “solution” to this misdirected state‐defined “problem” provides no benefit to current residents and will – in fact – be to their detriment. If the Council continues to service this unsupported and unjustified RHNA process, it will be decreasing its ability to defend its residents, which is one of the City Council’s core responsibilities.

How does the State justify the need for increasing residents in Santa Monica? Out of the 8,895 units of housing being required by the State, 1,156 units (13%) are acknowledged as the true future organic growth requirement of the City in the next eight years. The other 7,739 units (87%) are related to hypothetical concepts of “existing need” which are defined as 4,300 units that should be built due to the existence of “high quality Item 8.B
06/21/22
33 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) 4 transit areas” (HQTA) – bus stops – and 2,749 units due to proximity to places of employment.

Then there is a catchall of around 690 more units just for good measure.

How relevant is this “existing need”? The state’s definition of HQTA has been defined as basic bus service. Yet, the BBB’s (and LA Metro) actual transit utility is so low that ridership is at an all‐time low, and remains in a decline that predated the pandemic.

The jobs requirement is related to “workforce” housing. But, as cities such as Santa Monica are within larger metropolitan areas, the traditional (and only logical) concept has been to look at jobs and housing on a broader regional scale to account for the fact that as people change jobs, they do not need to change living location. Under the new state models, it appears that workers are conveniently assumed not to change jobs. But when they actually do, and they no longer work in Santa Monica, will they consequently lose their housing to make way for others who take their place in those Santa Monica jobs? Of course not.

This is an opportunity for Council action to defend the residents The prior City Council failed the residents in pushing back against this nonsensical State overreach at its inception.

Each iteration of staff compliance with State demands reduces the City’s ability to defend its residents.

Does the Council want to continue on this path? Many residents feel that there needs to be a significant policy course correction.

Thank you,
Marc L. Verville
Sunset Park
Santa Monica
Item 8.B
06/21/22
34 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) 5 Vernice Hankins
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 10:33 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]; Phil Brock; Gleam Davis; Oscar de la Torre; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Jing Yeo; David Martin; David White Subject: City Council 6/21 agenda item 8-B -- Revised Husing Element

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council members,

Agenda item 8-B staff report:
http://www.acgov.org/board/bos_calendar/documents/DocsAgendaReg_11_18_21/GENERAL%20ADMINISTRATION/Re gular%20Calendar/Housing_Element_RHNA_11_18_21.pdf

1) On page 3 of 8 of the staff report for item 8-A on the City Council's 6/21 agenda, it says that overall housing capacity was increased to over 13,000 units.

Does that mean that Planning staff will then propose zoning changes to accommodate 13,000 additional housing units? Why do this when we're only required to zone for 9,000?

2) This plan includes allowing 300+ housing units at 4th/5th & Arizona, leaving no room for a park.

3) This plan includes allowing 700+ housing units at the Bergamot Arts Center. What will happen to the art galleries?

4) Up zoning even more of the city city than necessary for 9,000 housing units (which was a ridiculous number to begin with) will allow investors from near and far to buy up property for speculation.

This will not benefit residents and, if that much housing is actually built, it will create enormous stress on city infrastructure, especially water.

5) Will outdoor watering restrictions eventually move from 2x per week to 2x per month? Why not just cut down all the trees in the city and be done with it, rather than watch them sicken and die from lack of water?

6) We can also go ahead and replace all the remaining grass with decomposed granite, asphalt, and cement, thus creating a gigantic heat island in Santa Monica.

7) In addition, legislation currently moving through the state legislature will remove all parking requirements for new construction, so imagine thousands of new daily car trips as residents drive around looking for street parking.

What a great way to make a city unlivable.

Zina Josephs (Santa Monica resident since 1970)
Item 8.B
06/21/22
35 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) 6 Vernice Hankins
From: Daniel Galamba <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 9:38 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Sue Himmelrich; Kristin McCowan; Oscar de la Torre; Daniel Galamba
Subject: June 21, 2022 City Council Meeting: Please Oppose Item 8.B. Housing Element Draft Redline Revisions

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
I request that you oppose the draft Housing Element Redline Revisions.

These revisions are based on a ridiculous RHNA assessment of 9,000 units that will result in Santa Monica's population increasing by 20% over 8 years with all the resulting traffic, congestion, gridlock, public services and infrastructure that go along with it. All not paid by the State. California's and Los Angeles County's population has increased by about 2% over the past 10 years. Santa Monica's population has increased by only about 3% over this same 10 year period.

Therefore requiring a 20% increase in Santa Monica's population over 8 years is just simply up zoning so developers can make more money at our expense.

These 9,000 units include 6,000 affordable units that will cost about $3 billion. Again, not paid by the State. We don't have $440 million to pay our unfunded pension obligations let alone $3 billion for 6,000 affordable units. Therefore, over time the requirement that these units be affordable will be dropped and market rate units will then go in there because there will be the money for that. This is just a two‐step process so developers can make more money at our expense. This will destroy our City as developers did in Westwood and West Los Angeles in the 1980's. Now people don't want to live in West Los Angeles anymore or come to Westwood Village or West Los Angeles anymore and both Westwood Village and West Los Angeles are going down hill and I don't want the same thing to happen to us in Santa Monica and it will.

I therefore request that you suspend working with the State on these Housing Element Revisions and join other cities (e.g. Pasadena) in legal action against the State until the State accepts a RHNA that reflects a realistic 2‐3% population growth in Santa Monica over 8 years. Please don't let our City of Santa Monica be looted by greedy developers as they did in Westwood and West Los Angeles in the 1980's. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Dr Daniel Galamba

Item 8.B
06/21/22
36 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) 1 Vernice Hankins
From: Nancy Coleman <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 3:01 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Sue Himmelrich; Gleam Davis; [email protected]; Christine Parra; Phil Brock; Oscar de la Torre; Lana Negrete; Jing Yeo; David Martin Subject: Item 8B

EXTERNAL
To:  Mayor Himmelrich and Council Members
From:  Nancy Coleman
Date:  June 21, 2022
Re Item 8 B, Housing Element
8 B Housing Element
While I understand that the goal of tonight’s effort is to approve a state acceptable Housing Element there are a number of questions still outstanding.  The Council needs to think about where parks will be when all city‐owned property is designated for affordable housing.  Santa Monica is already a park pour community.

The increased height and FAR for Neighborhood Commercial streets is not acceptable. 55 feet is too high. If state bonuses are applied it will be even higher.
1) On page 3 of 8 of the staff report for item 8-A on the City Council's 6/21 agenda, it says that overall housing capacity was increased to over 13,000 units.

Does that mean that Planning staff will then propose zoning changes to accommodate 13,000 additional housing units? Why do this when we're only required to zone for 9,000 and this is too many for the city. 2) This plan includes allowing 300+ housing units at 4th/5th & Arizona, leaving no room for a park. 3) This plan includes allowing 700+ housing units at the Bergamot Arts Center. What will happen to the art galleries? 4) Up zoning even more of the city, including the increased heights of up to 84 feet in a portion of the DCP and Bergamot plus state bonuses will make the City of Santa Monica have the look of downtown Miami. is the than necessary for 9,000 housing units?
Item 8.B
06/21/22
37 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) 2 This will not benefit residents and, if that much housing is actually built, it will create enormous stress on city infrastructure, especially water.

Nancy Coleman
Item 8.B
06/21/22
38 of 38 Item 8.B
06/21/22

8.B.p
Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Response to HCD (120 mins)) City Council
Housing Element Draft Redline Revisions
June 21, 2022

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Purpose
• Review and Direct staff to transmit Housing Element draft redline revisions to HCD comments on adopted Housing Element
• Redlines focus on changes necessary to get to compliant Housing Element • Does not revisit policy decisions previously approved by City Council that were not subject of HCD comments
• General Categories of Comments & Responses to HCD Comments

1. Technical Revisions – Suitable Sites Inventory, Constraints Analysis, ADUs

2. AFFH – Santa Monica’s Fair Housing Approach
• Rezoning - Height/FAR adjustments for housing projects and distribution across the city based on Planning Commission prior direction and AFFH requirements

3. City-owned sites

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Mandated by State Housing Element Law
• Encourage Housing Production
• Government Code 65583.2(c)(3) - zoning must be appropriate to accommodate the RHNA (8,895 units) of which 69% must be for lower income housing • Demonstrate through Suitable Sites Inventory
• Account for financial feasibility
Income Category RHNA Allocation
Very Low Income
(0-50% AMI) 2794
Low Income
(51-80% AMI) 1672
Moderate Income
(81-120% AMI) 1702
Above Moderate
(>120% AMI) 2727

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Key Housing Element Deadlines
• October 15, 2021 – Adopt a compliant
Housing Element
• February 12, 2022 – extra 120 days to
adopt a compliantHousing Element in
order to avoid updating Housing
Element every 4 years
• AB1398 took effect on January 1, 2022
replacing this provision with a requirement
to rezone for the RHNA by October 15, 2022
HCD’s position is that
HCD had to certify the
Housing Element before
Council adoption

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Out of Compliance - Consequences
Immediate short-term consequences
• Approvals
• Must approve any project with 20% on-site units affordable to lowerincome households or 100% moderate units even if the project exceeds zoning or LUCE maximums
• Conditions cannot render the project infeasible
• Loss of funding for affordable housing
• Rezoning for RHNA complete by 10/15/22
• If rezoning not completed
• Must approve any project with at least 49% of housing units affordable to very low, low and moderate income households on SSI that meets the standards listed in the housing programs for rezoning
• State can start enforcement proceedings against City

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Out of Compliance - Consequences
Long-term consequences
• SB35 determination based on building permits issued
relative to pro-rated RHNA
• If Above Moderate RHNA not met – streamlined process for projects with at 10% affordability
• If Lower Income RHNA not met – streamlined process for projects with at least 50% affordability
• Requires ministerial approval process for housing projects that include
State can also seek judicial relief and impose penalties and fines

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Background
• October 12, 2021 – Housing Element adopted
• February 2, 2022 – Planning Commission comments on
height/FAR for housing projects to achieve sufficient capacity for 6th Cycle RHNA
• February 8, 2022 – HCD letter received
• April 26, 2022 – progress update on HCD consultations • June 1 & 15, 2022 – Planning Commission direction on key factors that affect overall capacity + draft redline revisions

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Next Steps
• Focus on completing Housing Element policy document
• June 15 – Planning Commission
• Draft redline revisions to Housing Element
• June 21 – City Council
• Draft redline revisions to Housing Element
• July – Submit draft redline revisions to HCD for 60 day review • If “draft in compliance” letter received will work on zoning through September
• September – adoption of the EIR, adoption of draft redlines We are here

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Technical Revisions
• Suitable Sites Inventory – Appendix F
• Added maps, tables, explanation of how SSI sites improve or exacerbate fair housing conditions
• Reduced the realistic capacity of sites, taking into account 15% commercial probability factor
• Added evidence to justify use of factors, such as improvements to land ratio, age of buildings, vacancy, and tenancy
• Provided evidence that presumed densities have occurred on small sites

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Technical Revisions
• Constraints Analysis
• Emergency Shelters – Revised analysis demonstrating sufficient capacity; revised Program 2.I to include compliance with AB 139
• Permanent Supportive Housing – Clarification added to ensure no discretionary action is required for supportive housing
• Employee Housing – Compliant with State law, no revisions necessary • Land Use Controls – Language added to Programs 1.F and 1.J to clarify intent to modify standards and regulations that are found to be constraints; FAR and Building Height tables added to both programs
• Fees & Exactions – Clarification provided the typical residential project do NOT require a CUP; Clarification regarding how entitlement fees are determined • Local Processing & Permit Procedure – Demonstrate that design approval findings still create predictable process
• Program 2.1 – Revisions provided to include known amendments needed for State law consistency

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Technical Revisions
• ADUs
• Updated number of ADU permits issued per year and included 2021, with assumptions based on these numbers revised throughout the Housing Element
• Projected 47 building permits/year on average
• Difference between Housing Element and Annual Progress Report will be reconciled

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
• Santa Monica’s Fair Housing Strategy leads with housing preservation – added geographic targeting & metrics
• Program 2F
• Program 2G
• Program 2I
• Goal 3 Programs – reflection of all Santa Monica’s actions on antidisplacement and housing preservation • Goal 4 Programs – increase equitable housing access
• *NEW* 4E and 4F
• Goal 6 Program – housing assistance
• Goal 7 Programs – fair housing enforcement

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Adding Housing as Permitted Use in
Areas where it has been prohibited
• Office Campus (OC)
• Industrial Conservation (IC)
• Conservation: Creative Sector
(CCS)
Upzonefor Housing Potential in
Areas that Have Not
Accommodated Housing in the Past
• Main Street
• Montana Ave
• Ocean Park Boulevard
AFFH: Permit Housing Where Housing Has not Occurred

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Housing Preservation: Location of Rent Control Units
Zoning
Parcels with
Rent Control
Units
% Parcels
with Rent
Control Units
Total Rent
Control
Units
% of all Rent Control
Units
R1 60 0.9% 60 1.5%
R2 2261 53.3% 2463 63.0%
R3 510 66.5% 644 16.5%
R4 16 44.4% 17 0.4%
OPD 10 40.0% 10 0.3%
OP1 13 8.4% 13 0.3%
OP2 480 38.9% 554 14.2%
OP3 13 35.1% 46 1.2%
OP4 10 13.0% 10 0.3%
MUBL 41 9.7% 43 1.1%
MUB 1 0.6% 1 0.0%
GC 12 5.1% 12 0.3%
HMU 11 15.5% 11 0.3%
OF 2 5.0% 2 0.1%
CCS 1 3.8% 1 0.0%
DCP 22 4.5% 22 0.6%
• 25.7% of all residentially zoned parcels contain rent control units
• 97.6% of all rent control units are in residential zones

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
• Influenced distribution of housing capacity (FAR/height) throughout the city
• Informed programs for R1 Zones

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Basis for Height/FAR Recommendation
FAR Used for Calculation Overall Unit Capacity
SSI capacity - adopted
Housing Element (Oct ’21) 11,070
SSI capacity – current
recommendation (June’22) ~est. 13,000
• Basis for Suitable Sites Inventory
• Demonstrate overall housing
capacity for purposes of EIR
project description
• 15% inclusionary
requirement
• Minimum parking
requirement
• Ground floor flexibility
• Distribution based on
spreading housing
throughout city
• More intensive housing
potential north of I-10
• Less intensive housing
potential for Main, Pico,
Montana, Ocean Park
Factor #1
Feasibility
Factor #2
AFFH Calculate Capacity

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Evolution of Height/FAR
Mixed Use/Commercial Zones – No Tiers
• Overall Capacity
• ~13,600 units
• Need to ensure buffer at each
income level to account for
future pending projects
• Overall buffer – 53%
• Lower Income – 60% buffer
• Moderate Income - 12% buffer
Zone Council
Approved
10/12/21
Current
Recommendation
6/21/22
MUBL – N I-10 2.25/50’ 3.25/70’
MUBL – Pico 2.25/50’ 2.00/45’
MUBL – Pico
(West of Lincoln) 2.25/50’ 2.50/55’
MUBL – Main St 2.25/50’ 2.50/55’
MUBL – Lincoln 2.25/50’ 2.50/55’
MUB 2.75/60’ 3.25/70’
GC (SMB) 2.75/60’ 3.25/70’
GC (Lincoln) 2.25/50’ 2.50/55’

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Evolution of Height/FAR
Mixed Use/Commercial Zones – No Tiers
Zone Council
Approved
10/12/21
Current
Recommendation
6/21/22
GC (Pico) 2.75/60’ 2.00/45’
NC 2.75/60’ 2.25/50’
NC (Main) 3.00/65’ 2.50/55’
NC (Ocean Park) 2.75/60’ 2.50/55’
NC (Montana) 2.25/50’ 2.50/55’
IC 3.25/70’ 3.00/65’
OC 2.75/60’ 2.75/60’
HMU 2.75/60’ 2.50/55’
• Overall Capacity
• ~13,600 units
• Need to ensure buffer at each
income level to account for
future pending projects
• Overall buffer – 53%
• Lower Income – 60% buffer
• Moderate Income - 12% buffer

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in HMU

2.5 55’
Equitable Distribution of Housing Capacity
across Santa Monica

2.5 55’

2.0 45’

2.75 60’

3.0 65’

2.75 60’

2.5 55’

2.25 50’

2.5 55’

3.25 70’

2.5 55’

2.0 45’

2.75 60’

3.0 65’

2.75 60’

2.5 55’

2.25 50’

2.5 55’

3.25 70’
HMU

2.5 55’
Map of Recommended FAR/Height

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Evolution of Height/FAR
Bergamot Area Plan – No Tiers
Zone Council
Approved
10/12/21
Current
Recommendation
6/21/22
BTV 2.50/55’ 4.00/84’
MUC -
North of Penn.
and South of Expo
Bike Path

2.50/55’ 3.25/70’
MUC– South of
Nebraska & North
of Expo Bike Path

2.50/55’ 4.00/84’
CCS 2.50/55’ 2.50/55’
CAC 2.50/55’ 2.50/55’

4.0 84’

2.50 55’

4.0 84’

2.50 55’

4.0 84’

3.25 70’

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Evolution of Height/FAR
Downtown Community Plan
Scenario 1
(High Range)
Scenario 1
(Low Range)
Scenario 2
(AFFH)
Scenarios 3, 4, 5
New PC & Staff Recommended
6/15/22
Zone Council
Endorsed
10/12/21
Updated
Feasibility
Feb 2022
Staff
Recommend
Feb 2022
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3
LT (East) 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75/60’ 3.0/65’ -
LT (West) 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75/60’ 3.0/65’ -
NV 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75/60’ 3.50/70’ 4.0/84’
BC (Promenade) 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75/60’ 3.0/65’ -
BC (2nd/4th) 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75/60’ 3.50/70’ -
TA 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75/60’ 3.50/70’ 4.0/84’
OT 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75/60’ 3.0/65’ -
WT 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75/60’ 3.0/65’ -

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Map of Recommended FAR/Height
- Downtown
NV Zone Tier 3

4.0 84’
All DCP Tier 1: 2.75 FAR, 60’
Tier 2

3.5 70’
Tier 2

3.0 65’
Tier 2

3.0 65’
NV Zone Tier 3

4.0 84’
Tier 2

3.5 70’
Tier 2

3.0 65’
Tier 2

3.0 65’

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in AFFH in R1 Zones
• Discussions with HCD clarified that requirements of demonstrating commitment for additional units in R1 (does not need to be deed restricted) • NEW Programs 4E & 4F
• PROGRAM 4.E: PROVIDE NEW HOUSING CHOICES AND AFFORDABILITY IN HIGH OPPORTUNITY AREAS THROUGH INCENTIVES FOR SB9 UNITS IN R1-ZONE NEIGHBORHOODS The City shall adopt a local ordinance implementing SB9, which shall establish an administrative process without any discretionary action and shall include strong incentives to densify larger parcels in R1-Zone neighborhoods by allowing property owners on parcels of at least 10,000 sf to add ADUs as allowed under State Law in addition to SB9 projects. This will open up the possibility for property owners to construct up to 6 units through a multi-step process and create more housing choices and affordability in some of the most affluent areas of the city in accordance with Program 4F. • PROGRAM 4F: ESTABLISH TARGET TO INCREASE HOUSING PRODUCTION IN R1 ZONES AND

INCLUDE MID-CYCLE MONITORING
The City shall aim to issue at least 47 building permits per year for additional housing units and types in R1 zones. Review progress towards targets by December 31, 2025, and if targets are not being met, adjust land use strategies as necessary and appropriate within one year.

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in City Owned Sites
• HCD requires commitment that City-owned sites can
accommodate the 1,880 affordable housing units
Sites Unit Capacity Constraints
Parking Structure 3 (pending project) 104 None
Wilshire Parking Lots (3) 130 None
4th Street and Arizona 362 Bank leases don’t terminate until 2026 Bergamot Arts Center 707 Property management agreement until April 2027.

Annual leases with 30 businesses that renew each
calendar year until redevelopment
Main Street Parking Lots 577 None but replacement parking will be necessary (Coastal Zone)
Total 1,880

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in City Owned Sites & Lower Income Shortfall
• Government Code section 65583.2, subdivisions (h) and (i) states that candidate sites must be rezoned to address the shortfall in lower income units
• Under existing zoning, the lower income shortfall is approximately 1,100 units
• City-owned sites have lower income capacity of 1,880 units to accommodate the shortfall.
• Per State law, these sites must allow 100 percent residential use and require residential use to occupy at least 50 percent of the floor area • Loss of a City-owned site means that there will be a shortfall in lower income capacity = must identify alternate site to make up for the loss

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in City-Owned Sites – Draft Revision Program 2E
The City shall plan for a minimum of 1,884 1,880 affordable housing units across available City-owned sites, which may include, but shall not be limited to, rezoning actions in the LUCE, Specific Plans, and/or Zoning Ordinance amendments. Amendments to maximize affordable housing development potential on City-owned sites, and any subsequent development of those sites will be guided through a public process, including engagement of community stakeholders. At least three RFPs shall be issued for city-owned sites identified on the Suitable Sites Inventory to accommodate at least 1,884 affordable units. The first An RFP for at least one a city-owned site shall be issued by June 30, 2023. Subsequently, the City shall issue an RFP by June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2027 accounting for existing constraints on city-owned sites such as existing leases as shown in Figure F-6, Appendix F. Following the regular process for production of affordable housing on city-owned land, at the conclusion of the RFP process, . Future RFPs shall be staggered based on availability of resources.the City will select a developer partner for each city-owned site with the intent to develop each site for 100% affordable housing. The developer would negotiate a ground lease with the City, process any necessary loans through the City’s local Housing Trust Fund, and concurrently process the Planning entitlements for the project through a ministerial process. The timeframe from selection of a developer to issuance of building permits typically takes approximately 24-30 months.

As has been done in the past, the City will use a variety of tools Tto facilitate 100% affordable housing development including but not limited to:
• Facilitate appropriate zoning and process to support 100% affordable housing • Substantially reduced or free ground rent, the City will • Providing funding through local housing trust fund
• Support applications for other funding sources for affordable housing (e.g. low-income-housing tax credits, grants, State funding, Federal funding) Further, the City will continue to assess appropriate City-owned properties for the development of affordable housing, or in some cases may consider the most appropriate disposition of City properties to nonprofit developers for the development of affordable housing.”

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Additional Redlines (Inadvertent Omissions)
• Program 1D
• Timeframe: by June 30, 2023 October 15, 2022
• Programs 1F and 1J
• “Any changes will promote housing and ensure that overall unit capacity assumed in the site inventory is met, including income category, and will be no lower than the minimum FAR and height shown in the table below.” • Program 1F
• “In addition to FAR and height, the City shall review and modify as appropriate all standards and regulations that may be considered a constraint to housing production including but not limited to development impact fees, unit mix, and design standards…”
• Program 1J
• The off-site affordability requirement will shall be greater than the on-site requirement

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Additional Redlines (Inadvertent Omissions)
• Program 4E
• Delete “In addition, these SB9 units shall be required to be rented or sold.” • Program 6A – Program Background
• Add voucher distribution in 90405
• Chapter 1, Section H – Summary of Housing Programs
• Program 4A
• Timeframe: by October 15, 2022
• Minor numerical adjustments in Chapter 4 due to calculations from approved/pending projects in SSI
• Approved/Pending Projects (Page 110)
• Capacity to Accommodate RHNA by Income Levels (Page 112) • Figure 4-4 (Page 113)

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Recommendation
• Review and Direct staff to transmit draft redline revisions to HCD

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Why Has Overall Capacity Increased?
Addressing HCD Comments means the need to study an
increase in overall number of potential housing units based on two main factors
Overall Number
of Units
(RHNA + Buffer
~13,000 units)
Reduced
number
of parcels
1) Re-categorizing sites on the SSI
from future projects to pending
projects due to applications
received for housing projects
since September 2021
2) 15% reduction in zoned
capacity to account for
possibility that sites develop
into 100% commercial instead
of housing

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in Example Housing Potential by Census Tract

8.B.q
Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation (4856 : Housing Element Draft Revisions in

Santa Monica City CouncilJune 21, 2022

Santa Monica City Council
June 21, 2022